blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ea644a0d52189a41d215a213f5439fabf1208379 | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /hott/init/tactic.hlean | cd53a8dc7e72dc1df77ad258054e5a1a5b983ce1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,171 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
This is just a trick to embed the 'tactic language' as a Lean
expression. We should view 'tactic' as automation that when execute
produces a term. tactic.builtin is just a "dummy" for creating the
definitions that are actually implemented in C++
-/
prelude
import init.datatypes init.reserved_notation init.num
inductive tactic :
Type := builtin : tactic
namespace tactic
-- Remark the following names are not arbitrary, the tactic module
-- uses them when converting Lean expressions into actual tactic objects.
-- The bultin 'by' construct triggers the process of converting a
-- a term of type 'tactic' into a tactic that sythesizes a term
definition and_then (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition or_else (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition append (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition interleave (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition par (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition fixpoint (f : tactic → tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition repeat (t : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition at_most (t : tactic) (k : num) : tactic := builtin
definition discard (t : tactic) (k : num) : tactic := builtin
definition focus_at (t : tactic) (i : num) : tactic := builtin
definition try_for (t : tactic) (ms : num) : tactic := builtin
definition all_goals (t : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition now : tactic := builtin
definition assumption : tactic := builtin
definition eassumption : tactic := builtin
definition state : tactic := builtin
definition fail : tactic := builtin
definition id : tactic := builtin
definition beta : tactic := builtin
definition info : tactic := builtin
definition whnf : tactic := builtin
definition contradiction : tactic := builtin
definition exfalso : tactic := builtin
definition congruence : tactic := builtin
definition rotate_left (k : num) := builtin
definition rotate_right (k : num) := builtin
definition rotate (k : num) := rotate_left k
-- This is just a trick to embed expressions into tactics.
-- The nested expressions are "raw". They tactic should
-- elaborate them when it is executed.
inductive expr : Type :=
builtin : expr
inductive expr_list : Type :=
| nil : expr_list
| cons : expr → expr_list → expr_list
-- auxiliary type used to mark optional list of arguments
definition opt_expr_list := expr_list
-- auxiliary types used to mark that the expression is suppose to be an identifier, optional, or a list.
definition identifier := expr
definition identifier_list := expr_list
definition opt_identifier_list := expr_list
-- Remark: the parser has special support for tactics containing `location` parameters.
-- It will parse the optional `at ...` modifier.
definition location := expr
-- Marker for instructing the parser to parse it as 'with <expr>'
definition with_expr := expr
-- Marker for instructing the parser to parse it as '?(using <expr>)'
definition using_expr := expr
-- Constant used to denote the case were no expression was provided
definition none_expr : expr := expr.builtin
definition apply (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition eapply (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition fapply (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition rename (a b : identifier) : tactic := builtin
definition intro (e : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition generalize_tac (e : expr) (id : identifier) : tactic := builtin
definition clear (e : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition revert (e : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition refine (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition exact (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
-- Relaxed version of exact that does not enforce goal type
definition rexact (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition check_expr (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition trace (s : string) : tactic := builtin
-- rewrite_tac is just a marker for the builtin 'rewrite' notation
-- used to create instances of this tactic.
definition rewrite_tac (e : expr_list) : tactic := builtin
definition xrewrite_tac (e : expr_list) : tactic := builtin
definition krewrite_tac (e : expr_list) : tactic := builtin
definition replace (old : expr) (new : with_expr) (loc : location) : tactic := builtin
-- Arguments:
-- - ls : lemmas to be used (if not provided, then blast will choose them)
-- - ds : definitions that can be unfolded (if not provided, then blast will choose them)
definition blast (ls : opt_identifier_list) (ds : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
-- with_options_tac is just a marker for the builtin 'with_options' notation
definition with_options_tac (o : expr) (t : tactic) : tactic := builtin
-- with_options_tac is just a marker for the builtin 'with_attributes' notation
definition with_attributes_tac (o : expr) (n : identifier_list) (t : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition cases (h : expr) (ids : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition induction (h : expr) (rec : using_expr) (ids : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition intros (ids : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition generalizes (es : expr_list) : tactic := builtin
definition clears (ids : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition reverts (ids : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition change (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition assert_hypothesis (id : identifier) (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition note_tac (id : identifier) (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition constructor (k : option num) : tactic := builtin
definition fconstructor (k : option num) : tactic := builtin
definition existsi (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition split : tactic := builtin
definition left : tactic := builtin
definition right : tactic := builtin
definition injection (e : expr) (ids : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition subst (ids : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition substvars : tactic := builtin
definition reflexivity : tactic := builtin
definition symmetry : tactic := builtin
definition transitivity (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition try (t : tactic) : tactic := or_else t id
definition repeat1 (t : tactic) : tactic := and_then t (repeat t)
definition focus (t : tactic) : tactic := focus_at t 0
definition determ (t : tactic) : tactic := at_most t 1
definition trivial : tactic := or_else (apply eq.refl) assumption
definition do (n : num) (t : tactic) : tactic :=
nat.rec id (λn t', and_then t t') (nat.of_num n)
end tactic
tactic_infixl `;`:15 := tactic.and_then
tactic_notation T1 `:`:15 T2 := tactic.focus (tactic.and_then T1 (tactic.all_goals T2))
tactic_notation `(` h `|` r:(foldl `|` (e r, tactic.or_else r e) h) `)` := r
|
6215ca8577694f65ed6c868657bc39ca93f8352e | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/category_theory/fully_faithful.lean | f8d7d69a8becb132cad15393c8f3185dcd8db13c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,156 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.natural_isomorphism
import data.equiv.basic
universes v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
/--
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is full if for each `X Y : C`, `F.map` is surjective.
In fact, we use a constructive definition, so the `full F` typeclass contains data,
specifying a particular preimage of each `f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y`.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001C.
-/
class full (F : C ⥤ D) :=
(preimage : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : (F.obj X) ⟶ (F.obj Y)), X ⟶ Y)
(witness' : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : (F.obj X) ⟶ (F.obj Y)), F.map (preimage f) = f . obviously)
restate_axiom full.witness'
attribute [simp] full.witness
/--
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is faithful if for each `X Y : C`, `F.map` is injective.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001C.
-/
class faithful (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop :=
(map_injective' [] : ∀ {X Y : C}, function.injective (@functor.map _ _ _ _ F X Y) . obviously)
restate_axiom faithful.map_injective'
namespace functor
lemma map_injective (F : C ⥤ D) [faithful F] {X Y : C} :
function.injective $ @functor.map _ _ _ _ F X Y :=
faithful.map_injective F
/-- The specified preimage of a morphism under a full functor. -/
def preimage (F : C ⥤ D) [full F] {X Y : C} (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) : X ⟶ Y :=
full.preimage.{v₁ v₂} f
@[simp] lemma image_preimage (F : C ⥤ D) [full F] {X Y : C} (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) :
F.map (preimage F f) = f :=
by unfold preimage; obviously
end functor
variables {F : C ⥤ D} [full F] [faithful F] {X Y Z : C}
@[simp] lemma preimage_id : F.preimage (𝟙 (F.obj X)) = 𝟙 X :=
F.map_injective (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_comp (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) (g : F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj Z) :
F.preimage (f ≫ g) = F.preimage f ≫ F.preimage g :=
F.map_injective (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_map (f : X ⟶ Y) :
F.preimage (F.map f) = f :=
F.map_injective (by simp)
/-- If `F : C ⥤ D` is fully faithful, every isomorphism `F.obj X ≅ F.obj Y` has a preimage. -/
def preimage_iso (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) : X ≅ Y :=
{ hom := F.preimage f.hom,
inv := F.preimage f.inv,
hom_inv_id' := F.map_injective (by simp),
inv_hom_id' := F.map_injective (by simp), }
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_hom (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) :
(preimage_iso f).hom = F.preimage f.hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_inv (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) :
(preimage_iso f).inv = F.preimage (f.inv) := rfl
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_map_iso (f : X ≅ Y) : preimage_iso (F.map_iso f) = f :=
by tidy
variables (F)
/--
If the image of a morphism under a fully faithful functor in an isomorphism,
then the original morphisms is also an isomorphism.
-/
def is_iso_of_fully_faithful (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso (F.map f)] : is_iso f :=
{ inv := F.preimage (inv (F.map f)),
hom_inv_id' := F.map_injective (by simp),
inv_hom_id' := F.map_injective (by simp) }
/-- If `F` is fully faithful, we have an equivalence of hom-sets `X ⟶ Y` and `F X ⟶ F Y`. -/
def equiv_of_fully_faithful {X Y} : (X ⟶ Y) ≃ (F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, F.map f,
inv_fun := λ f, F.preimage f,
left_inv := λ f, by simp,
right_inv := λ f, by simp }
@[simp]
lemma equiv_of_fully_faithful_apply {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
equiv_of_fully_faithful F f = F.map f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma equiv_of_fully_faithful_symm_apply {X Y} (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) :
(equiv_of_fully_faithful F).symm f = F.preimage f := rfl
end category_theory
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
instance full.id : full (𝟭 C) :=
{ preimage := λ _ _ f, f }
instance faithful.id : faithful (𝟭 C) := by obviously
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D] {E : Type u₃} [category.{v₃} E]
variables (F F' : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
instance faithful.comp [faithful F] [faithful G] : faithful (F ⋙ G) :=
{ map_injective' := λ _ _ _ _ p, F.map_injective (G.map_injective p) }
lemma faithful.of_comp [faithful $ F ⋙ G] : faithful F :=
{ map_injective' := λ X Y, (F ⋙ G).map_injective.of_comp }
section
variables {F F'}
lemma faithful.of_iso [faithful F] (α : F ≅ F') : faithful F' :=
{ map_injective' := λ X Y f f' h, F.map_injective
(by rw [←nat_iso.naturality_1 α.symm, h, nat_iso.naturality_1 α.symm]) }
end
variables {F G}
lemma faithful.of_comp_iso {H : C ⥤ E} [ℋ : faithful H] (h : F ⋙ G ≅ H) : faithful F :=
@faithful.of_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ F G (faithful.of_iso h.symm)
alias faithful.of_comp_iso ← category_theory.iso.faithful_of_comp
-- We could prove this from `faithful.of_comp_iso` using `eq_to_iso`,
-- but that would introduce a cyclic import.
lemma faithful.of_comp_eq {H : C ⥤ E} [ℋ : faithful H] (h : F ⋙ G = H) : faithful F :=
@faithful.of_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ F G (h.symm ▸ ℋ)
alias faithful.of_comp_eq ← eq.faithful_of_comp
variables (F G)
/-- “Divide” a functor by a faithful functor. -/
protected def faithful.div (F : C ⥤ E) (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
C ⥤ D :=
{ obj := obj,
map := @map,
map_id' :=
begin
assume X,
apply G.map_injective,
apply eq_of_heq,
transitivity F.map (𝟙 X), from h_map,
rw [F.map_id, G.map_id, h_obj X]
end,
map_comp' :=
begin
assume X Y Z f g,
apply G.map_injective,
apply eq_of_heq,
transitivity F.map (f ≫ g), from h_map,
rw [F.map_comp, G.map_comp],
congr' 1;
try { exact (h_obj _).symm };
exact h_map.symm
end }
-- This follows immediately from `functor.hext` (`functor.hext h_obj @h_map`),
-- but importing `category_theory.eq_to_hom` causes an import loop:
-- category_theory.eq_to_hom → category_theory.opposites →
-- category_theory.equivalence → category_theory.fully_faithful
lemma faithful.div_comp (F : C ⥤ E) [faithful F] (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
(faithful.div F G obj @h_obj @map @h_map) ⋙ G = F :=
begin
casesI F with F_obj _ _ _, casesI G with G_obj _ _ _,
unfold faithful.div functor.comp,
unfold_projs at h_obj,
have: F_obj = G_obj ∘ obj := (funext h_obj).symm,
substI this,
congr,
funext,
exact eq_of_heq h_map
end
lemma faithful.div_faithful (F : C ⥤ E) [faithful F] (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
faithful (faithful.div F G obj @h_obj @map @h_map) :=
(faithful.div_comp F G _ h_obj _ @h_map).faithful_of_comp
instance full.comp [full F] [full G] : full (F ⋙ G) :=
{ preimage := λ _ _ f, F.preimage (G.preimage f) }
/--
Given a natural isomorphism between `F ⋙ H` and `G ⋙ H` for a fully faithful functor `H`, we
can 'cancel' it to give a natural iso between `F` and `G`.
-/
def fully_faithful_cancel_right {F G : C ⥤ D} (H : D ⥤ E)
[full H] [faithful H] (comp_iso: F ⋙ H ≅ G ⋙ H) : F ≅ G :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ X, preimage_iso (comp_iso.app X))
(λ X Y f, H.map_injective (by simpa using comp_iso.hom.naturality f))
@[simp]
lemma fully_faithful_cancel_right_hom_app {F G : C ⥤ D} {H : D ⥤ E}
[full H] [faithful H] (comp_iso: F ⋙ H ≅ G ⋙ H) (X : C) :
(fully_faithful_cancel_right H comp_iso).hom.app X = H.preimage (comp_iso.hom.app X) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma fully_faithful_cancel_right_inv_app {F G : C ⥤ D} {H : D ⥤ E}
[full H] [faithful H] (comp_iso: F ⋙ H ≅ G ⋙ H) (X : C) :
(fully_faithful_cancel_right H comp_iso).inv.app X = H.preimage (comp_iso.inv.app X) :=
rfl
end category_theory
|
272095e484b0e9672260e286757fc6a83e673f9b | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/run/root.lean | ffa6be13b53155f7ee527e66d766a01f55bf7e19 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 231 | lean | constant foo : Prop
namespace N1
constant foo : Prop
#check N1.foo
#check _root_.foo
namespace N2
constant foo : Prop
#check N1.foo
#check N1.N2.foo
#print raw foo
#print raw _root_.foo
end N2
end N1
|
6f79ce48497a2d776c1846db390df9fff7243477 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/class_bug2.lean | 7eee3a4c3b4ee20de38c8bb614fd364934facf86 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 877 | lean | import logic
inductive category (ob : Type) (mor : ob → ob → Type) : Type :=
mk : Π (comp : Π⦃A B C : ob⦄, mor B C → mor A B → mor A C)
(id : Π {A : ob}, mor A A),
(Π {A B C D : ob} {f : mor A B} {g : mor B C} {h : mor C D},
comp h (comp g f) = comp (comp h g) f) →
(Π {A B : ob} {f : mor A B}, comp f id = f) →
(Π {A B : ob} {f : mor A B}, comp id f = f) →
category ob mor
attribute category [class]
namespace category
section sec_cat
variable A : Type
inductive foo :=
mk : A → foo
attribute foo [class]
variables {ob : Type} {mor : ob → ob → Type} {Cat : category ob mor}
definition compose := category.rec (λ comp id assoc idr idl, comp) Cat
definition id := category.rec (λ comp id assoc idr idl, id) Cat
infixr ∘ := compose
end sec_cat
end category
|
8387696f79626757d186ed4982911adc7c876892 | 9dd3f3912f7321eb58ee9aa8f21778ad6221f87c | /library/init/meta/quote.lean | 39b3d551ff1c6d6b9c1207876a9d1aaffcc2b6a3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bre7k30/lean | de893411bcfa7b3c5572e61b9e1c52951b310aa4 | 5a924699d076dab1bd5af23a8f910b433e598d7a | refs/heads/master | 1,610,900,145,817 | 1,488,006,845,000 | 1,488,006,845,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,643 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic
open tactic
meta class has_quote (α : Type) :=
(quote : α → pexpr)
@[inline] meta def quote {α : Type} [has_quote α] : α → pexpr :=
has_quote.quote
meta instance : has_quote nat := ⟨pexpr.mk_prenum_macro⟩
@[priority std.priority.default + 1]
meta instance : has_quote string := ⟨pexpr.mk_string_macro⟩
meta instance : has_quote pexpr := ⟨pexpr.mk_quote_macro⟩
meta instance : has_quote char :=
⟨λ ⟨n, pr⟩, ``(char.of_nat %%(quote n))⟩
meta instance : has_quote unsigned :=
⟨λ ⟨n, pr⟩, ``(unsigned.of_nat %%(quote n))⟩
meta def name.quote : name → pexpr
| name.anonymous := ``(name.anonymous)
| (name.mk_string s n) := ``(name.mk_string %%(quote s) %%(name.quote n))
| (name.mk_numeral i n) := ``(name.mk_numeral %%(quote i) %%(name.quote n))
meta instance : has_quote name := ⟨name.quote⟩
private meta def list.quote {α : Type} [has_quote α] : list α → pexpr
| [] := ``([])
| (h::t) := ``(%%(quote h) :: %%(list.quote t))
meta instance {α : Type} [has_quote α] : has_quote (list α) := ⟨list.quote⟩
meta instance {α : Type} [has_quote α] : has_quote (option α) :=
⟨λ opt, match opt with
| some x := ``(option.some %%(quote x))
| none := ``(option.none)
end⟩
meta instance : has_quote unit := ⟨λ _, ``(unit.star)⟩
meta instance {α β : Type} [has_quote α] [has_quote β] : has_quote (α × β) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, y⟩, ``((%%(quote x), %%(quote y)))⟩
|
bad43b81b62137f39719482aa88dc060298db03f | 76ce87faa6bc3c2aa9af5962009e01e04f2a074a | /HOMEWORK/exam1-practice.lean | 2198c7e003c5c2644f5bb637804f177d1f0fdd88 | [] | no_license | Mnormansell/Discrete-Notes | db423dd9206bbe7080aecb84b4c2d275b758af97 | 61f13b98be590269fc4822be7b47924a6ddc1261 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,412,435,424 | 1,540,919,483,000 | 1,540,919,483,000 | 148,684,638 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,675 | lean | /-***************-/
/- ** BASICS ** --/
/-***************-/
/-
#
Write a defintion of x as a value of
type nat having the specific value 0.
Be sure it type-checks.
-/
def x : ℕ := 0
/-
#
Write a definition of f as a function
of type ℕ → ℕ that returns the square of
the value to which it is applied (i.e.,
that it is given as an argument)
-/
def square (n: ℕ) : nat := n^2
#reduce square 3
/-
#
Write a definition of a function, nt, that
takes any proposition, P, and that returns
the proposition, P → false.
-/
def nt (P : Prop) : Prop := P → false
/-
#
What is the type of this function? Hint:
Use #check to check it.
-/
/-****************************************-/
/- ** PROOFS OF EQUALITY PROPOSITIONS ** --/
/-****************************************-/
/-
#1
Write a function that takes any type,
T : Type, and any value, t : T, and that
returns a proof of t = t.
-/
def equality {T : Type} (t : T) : t = t := eq.refl t
/-
#2a
Write a function that takes any type, T; three values,
a, b, and c, of type T; a proof of a = b; and a proof
of b = c; and that returns a proof of c = a. We give
you most of the answer. Replace the sorry with your
answer.
-/
def aBbCCa
{ T : Type }
(a b c : T)
(ab : a = b)
(bc: c = b) :
(c = a)
:= eq.trans bc (eq.symm ab)
def testMyself : ∀(a b c : Type), a = b → c = b → c = a :=
λ a b c ab cb,
eq.trans cb (eq.symm ab)
/-
#2b.
Define aBbCCa' to be the same function, but specify
its type using ∀ and → connectives, and then provide
the function value using a lambda expression (λ). So
you will start with "def", then the name, then a :,
then the proposition, starting with ∀ and ending with
→ (c = a), followed by :=, and finally follwed by a
lambda expression.
-/
def aBbCCa' : ∀(a b c : Type), ((a = b) → (c = b) → (c = a)) :=
λ (a : Type) (b : Type) (c : Type),
λ (ab : a = b) (cb : c = b),
(eq.trans cb (eq.symm ab))
-- λT, λa, λb, λc, λ (ab : a=b), λ (bc : b = c),
-- eq.trans cb (eq.symm ab)
-- this also works
/-*******************************-/
/- ** PROOFS OF CONJUNCTIONS ** --/
/-*******************************-/
/-
We assume P Q and R are propositions using the
following "variables" declaration. That means that
we can use P, Q, R, and S in the following theorems
without having to use ∀ P Q R S : Prop to introduce
them again for each individual proposition.
-/
variables P Q R S : Prop
/-
Prove the following propositions by completing
the definitions (replace sorrys with your answers).
-/
theorem t1 : P → Q → R → P :=
λ (pfP : P) (pfQ : Q) (pfR : R),
pfP
theorem t2 : Q → (Q ∧ Q) :=
λ (pfQ : Q),
(and.intro pfQ pfQ)
theorem t3 : (P ∧ Q) ∧ (Q ∧ R) → (P ∧ R) :=
λ (pfAll : (P ∧ Q) ∧ (Q ∧ R)),
and.intro (and.elim_left(and.elim_left pfAll)) (and.elim_right (and.elim_right pfAll))
/-*******************************-/
/- ** PROOFS OF IMPLICATIONS ** --/
/-*******************************-/
/-
Prove the following theorem. It claims that
implication is transitive (which it is).
-/
theorem t4 : ((P → Q) ∧ P) → Q :=
λ (pfLeft : ((P → Q) ∧ P)),
(and.elim_left pfLeft) (and.elim_right pfLeft)
theorem t5 :
(P → Q) → (Q → R) → (R → S) → (P → S) :=
λ (pfPtoQ : P → Q) (pfQtoR : Q → R) (pfRtoS : R → S) (pfP : P),
pfRtoS (pfQtoR (pfPtoQ (pfP)))
-- or
-- begin
-- assume pq qr rs,
-- assume p,
-- show S,
-- from rs (qr (pq p))
/-******************-/
/- ** Functions ** --/
/-******************-/
/-
Complete the following definition
with a value that makes the definition
type-check. You can answer with a
lambda expression. You can also
use a tactic script if you prefer.
-/
def n2n : ℕ → ℕ :=
λ (n : ℕ),
n
/-
Define a function called double
that takes any natural number, n,
and returns two times n.
-/
def double (g : ℕ) := g*2
/-
Write a test case for double
in the form of a theorem called
d15is30, that asserts that the
double of 15 is 30, and prove it.
-/
def d15is30 : double 15 = 30 := eq.refl 30
--- Your answer here
/-
Write a function, sum3, that takes three
natural numbers, a, b, c, and that returns
the sum of a, b, and c. Use a λ expression
to express the function.
-/
def sum3 : ∀(a b c : ℕ), ℕ :=
λ (a b c : ℕ), a + b + c
#reduce sum3 1 32 4
/-*****************-/
/- ** NEGATION ** --/
/-*****************-/
/-
You already know that double
negation elimination requires
classical reasoning (using the
law of the excluded middle).
Give a proof of the following
proposition, which asserts that
it's valid to introduce double
negatations. Note: You do not
need the law of the excluded
middle to prove it.
-/
def t6 : P → ¬ ¬ P :=
begin
assume pfP : P,
assume np : ¬P,
show false, from np pfP
end
-- applies not p to p implies false
/-
You've learned a few important
proof strategies. Explain in a
few words when might a proof
by negation be attempted, and
how one proceeds to use it.
Know the answer to the same
question about a proof by
contradiction.
-/
-- A proof by negation is attempted by first assuming that a proposition
-- is true, then proving that it cannot be true, therefore showing that the
-- propoisiton is false. For example, if you are trying to prove P → false,
-- you start by assuming P is true, then go through steps to show that it can't
-- be true, thereby showing P → False.
/-
Explain precisely why using a
proof by contradiction relies
on classical reasoning using
the law of the excluded middle.
-/
-- The law of excluded middle is needed because we need the axiom that there
-- are no "in between stages," either its P or its ¬P. Without that we cannot
-- know for certain that ¬¬P is P because ¬¬P could be one of the 'in between'
-- cases, but the law of excluded middle prevents this case.
/-
EXTRA CREDIT: Write a function
that takes a function, f, of type
ℕ → ℕ, and that returns a function
that, for any value, n, returns
one more that what f returns.
-/
def f : ℕ → ℕ :=
λ (n : ℕ),
n*2
def xtra (f : ℕ → ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ :=
λ (n : ℕ),
(f n) + 1
#reduce xtra f 2
/-
That's the end of the practice test.
Here's a partial inventory of inference
rules we've covered. and related concepts.
This is not enough material for a complete
review. Reread all the notes and work any
problems that you're not yet sure you know
how to solve.
-/
/-
Partial inventory of inference rules.
* Equality
-- eq.refl : given a type T and a value t : T, derives a proof of t = t
-- eq.symm : given a type T, values a b : T, and a proof of a = b, derives a proof of b = a
-- eq.trans : given a type T, values a b c : T, and proofs of a = b and b = c, derives a proof of a = c
* Conjunction
-- and.intro : given propositions, P Q : Prop, a proof P : P, and a proof q : Q, derives a proof of P ∧ Q
-- and.elim_right : given propositions, P Q : Prop and a proof pq : P ∧ Q, derives a proof of P
-- and.elim_right : given propositions, P Q : Prop and a proof pq : P ∧ Q, derives a proof of Q
* Implication
-- → introduction: given P Q : Prop and a derivation of a proof Q from a proof of P, conclude P → Q
-- note : a derivation of a proof of Q from a proof of P is given as a function of type P → Q
-- → elimination: given propositions, P and Q, a proof of P → Q, and a proof of P, derive a proof of Q
-- note that → elimination is both a formal version of Aristotle's modus ponens rule and function application
* Negation
-- introduction : given a proposition P and a proof of P → false, conclude ¬ P
-- elimination
---- in constructive logic, showing that a proposition, ¬ P, is false proves only ¬ ¬ P, not that P is true
---- try to derive a proof of P from the assumption of a proof for ¬ ¬ P and you will see the problem
---- you can read ¬ ¬ P as "there's no proof of ¬ P," or as "¬ P is false,"
---- classical logic adds the axiom of the excluded middle (AEM), stating that ∀ P : Prop, P ∨ ¬ P
---- if you accept this axiom and you know that ¬ P is false, then P must be true
---- the AEM enables ¬ elimination
---- given a proposition P and a proof of ¬ P → false (of ¬ ¬ P), derive a proof of P
* Forall
-- introduction : to prove ∀ p : P, Q, where P is a type and Q is a proposition that can involve be written in terms of p, show that Q holds for an any arbitrarily assumed value, p, of type P
-- elimination : given a proof of ∀ p : P, Q, and a specific value x : P, conclude Q
-/ |
3a4243f0fe144c7b1edc140d1f328334f2bf9380 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/analysis/normed_space/continuous_affine_map.lean | 330977e666af58b3631d5ff09e0e30c8ffc0be71 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,577 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import topology.algebra.continuous_affine_map
import analysis.normed_space.add_torsor
import analysis.normed_space.affine_isometry
import analysis.normed_space.operator_norm
/-!
# Continuous affine maps between normed spaces.
This file develops the theory of continuous affine maps between affine spaces modelled on normed
spaces.
In the particular case that the affine spaces are just normed vector spaces `V`, `W`, we define a
norm on the space of continuous affine maps by defining the norm of `f : V →A[𝕜] W` to be
`∥f∥ = max ∥f 0∥ ∥f.cont_linear∥`. This is chosen so that we have a linear isometry:
`(V →A[𝕜] W) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] W × (V →L[𝕜] W)`.
The abstract picture is that for an affine space `P` modelled on a vector space `V`, together with
a vector space `W`, there is an exact sequence of `𝕜`-modules: `0 → C → A → L → 0` where `C`, `A`
are the spaces of constant and affine maps `P → W` and `L` is the space of linear maps `V → W`.
Any choice of a base point in `P` corresponds to a splitting of this sequence so in particular if we
take `P = V`, using `0 : V` as the base point provides a splitting, and we prove this is an
isometric decomposition.
On the other hand, choosing a base point breaks the affine invariance so the norm fails to be
submultiplicative: for a composition of maps, we have only `∥f.comp g∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∥g∥ + ∥f 0∥`.
## Main definitions:
* `continuous_affine_map.cont_linear`
* `continuous_affine_map.has_norm`
* `continuous_affine_map.norm_comp_le`
* `continuous_affine_map.to_const_prod_continuous_linear_map`
-/
namespace continuous_affine_map
variables {𝕜 R V W W₂ P Q Q₂ : Type*}
variables [normed_add_comm_group V] [metric_space P] [normed_add_torsor V P]
variables [normed_add_comm_group W] [metric_space Q] [normed_add_torsor W Q]
variables [normed_add_comm_group W₂] [metric_space Q₂] [normed_add_torsor W₂ Q₂]
variables [normed_field R] [normed_space R V] [normed_space R W] [normed_space R W₂]
variables [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 V] [normed_space 𝕜 W] [normed_space 𝕜 W₂]
include V W
/-- The linear map underlying a continuous affine map is continuous. -/
def cont_linear (f : P →A[R] Q) : V →L[R] W :=
{ to_fun := f.linear,
cont := by { rw affine_map.continuous_linear_iff, exact f.cont, },
.. f.linear, }
@[simp] lemma coe_cont_linear (f : P →A[R] Q) :
(f.cont_linear : V → W) = f.linear :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_cont_linear_eq_linear (f : P →A[R] Q) :
(f.cont_linear : V →ₗ[R] W) = (f : P →ᵃ[R] Q).linear :=
by { ext, refl, }
@[simp] lemma coe_mk_const_linear_eq_linear (f : P →ᵃ[R] Q) (h) :
((⟨f, h⟩ : P →A[R] Q).cont_linear : V → W) = f.linear :=
rfl
lemma coe_linear_eq_coe_cont_linear (f : P →A[R] Q) :
((f : P →ᵃ[R] Q).linear : V → W) = (⇑f.cont_linear : V → W) :=
rfl
include W₂
@[simp] lemma comp_cont_linear (f : P →A[R] Q) (g : Q →A[R] Q₂) :
(g.comp f).cont_linear = g.cont_linear.comp f.cont_linear :=
rfl
omit W₂
@[simp] lemma map_vadd (f : P →A[R] Q) (p : P) (v : V) :
f (v +ᵥ p) = f.cont_linear v +ᵥ f p :=
f.map_vadd' p v
@[simp] lemma cont_linear_map_vsub (f : P →A[R] Q) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
f.cont_linear (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) = f p₁ -ᵥ f p₂ :=
f.to_affine_map.linear_map_vsub p₁ p₂
@[simp] lemma const_cont_linear (q : Q) : (const R P q).cont_linear = 0 := rfl
lemma cont_linear_eq_zero_iff_exists_const (f : P →A[R] Q) :
f.cont_linear = 0 ↔ ∃ q, f = const R P q :=
begin
have h₁ : f.cont_linear = 0 ↔ (f : P →ᵃ[R] Q).linear = 0,
{ refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩;
ext,
{ rw [← coe_cont_linear_eq_linear, h], refl, },
{ rw [← coe_linear_eq_coe_cont_linear, h], refl, }, },
have h₂ : ∀ (q : Q), f = const R P q ↔ (f : P →ᵃ[R] Q) = affine_map.const R P q,
{ intros q,
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩;
ext,
{ rw h, refl, },
{ rw [← coe_to_affine_map, h], refl, }, },
simp_rw [h₁, h₂],
exact (f : P →ᵃ[R] Q).linear_eq_zero_iff_exists_const,
end
@[simp] lemma to_affine_map_cont_linear (f : V →L[R] W) :
f.to_continuous_affine_map.cont_linear = f :=
by { ext, refl, }
@[simp] lemma zero_cont_linear :
(0 : P →A[R] W).cont_linear = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma add_cont_linear (f g : P →A[R] W) :
(f + g).cont_linear = f.cont_linear + g.cont_linear :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_cont_linear (f g : P →A[R] W) :
(f - g).cont_linear = f.cont_linear - g.cont_linear :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_cont_linear (f : P →A[R] W) :
(-f).cont_linear = -f.cont_linear :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_cont_linear (t : R) (f : P →A[R] W) :
(t • f).cont_linear = t • f.cont_linear :=
rfl
lemma decomp (f : V →A[R] W) :
(f : V → W) = f.cont_linear + function.const V (f 0) :=
begin
rcases f with ⟨f, h⟩,
rw [coe_mk_const_linear_eq_linear, coe_mk, f.decomp, pi.add_apply, linear_map.map_zero, zero_add],
end
section normed_space_structure
variables (f : V →A[𝕜] W)
/-- Note that unlike the operator norm for linear maps, this norm is _not_ submultiplicative:
we do _not_ necessarily have `∥f.comp g∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∥g∥`. See `norm_comp_le` for what we can say. -/
noncomputable instance has_norm : has_norm (V →A[𝕜] W) := ⟨λ f, max ∥f 0∥ ∥f.cont_linear∥⟩
lemma norm_def : ∥f∥ = (max ∥f 0∥ ∥f.cont_linear∥) := rfl
lemma norm_cont_linear_le : ∥f.cont_linear∥ ≤ ∥f∥ := le_max_right _ _
lemma norm_image_zero_le : ∥f 0∥ ≤ ∥f∥ := le_max_left _ _
@[simp] lemma norm_eq (h : f 0 = 0) : ∥f∥ = ∥f.cont_linear∥ :=
calc ∥f∥ = (max ∥f 0∥ ∥f.cont_linear∥) : by rw norm_def
... = (max 0 ∥f.cont_linear∥) : by rw [h, norm_zero]
... = ∥f.cont_linear∥ : max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
noncomputable instance : normed_add_comm_group (V →A[𝕜] W) :=
normed_add_comm_group.of_core _
{ norm_eq_zero_iff := λ f,
begin
rw norm_def,
refine ⟨λ h₀, _, by { rintros rfl, simp, }⟩,
rcases max_eq_iff.mp h₀ with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ | ⟨h₁, h₂⟩;
rw h₁ at h₂,
{ rw [norm_le_zero_iff, cont_linear_eq_zero_iff_exists_const] at h₂,
obtain ⟨q, rfl⟩ := h₂,
simp only [function.const_apply, coe_const, norm_eq_zero] at h₁,
rw h₁,
refl, },
{ rw [norm_eq_zero_iff', cont_linear_eq_zero_iff_exists_const] at h₁,
obtain ⟨q, rfl⟩ := h₁,
simp only [function.const_apply, coe_const, norm_le_zero_iff] at h₂,
rw h₂,
refl, },
end,
triangle := λ f g,
begin
simp only [norm_def, pi.add_apply, add_cont_linear, coe_add, max_le_iff],
exact ⟨(norm_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)),
(norm_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _))⟩,
end,
norm_neg := λ f, by simp [norm_def], }
instance : normed_space 𝕜 (V →A[𝕜] W) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ t f, by simp only [norm_def, smul_cont_linear, coe_smul, pi.smul_apply,
norm_smul, ← mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ (norm_nonneg t)], }
lemma norm_comp_le (g : W₂ →A[𝕜] V) :
∥f.comp g∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∥g∥ + ∥f 0∥ :=
begin
rw [norm_def, max_le_iff],
split,
{ calc ∥f.comp g 0∥ = ∥f (g 0)∥ : by simp
... = ∥f.cont_linear (g 0) + f 0∥ : by { rw f.decomp, simp, }
... ≤ ∥f.cont_linear∥ * ∥g 0∥ + ∥f 0∥ :
(norm_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add_right (f.cont_linear.le_op_norm _) _)
... ≤ ∥f∥ * ∥g∥ + ∥f 0∥ :
add_le_add_right (mul_le_mul f.norm_cont_linear_le g.norm_image_zero_le
(norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) _, },
{ calc ∥(f.comp g).cont_linear∥ ≤ ∥f.cont_linear∥ * ∥g.cont_linear∥ :
(g.comp_cont_linear f).symm ▸ f.cont_linear.op_norm_comp_le _
... ≤ ∥f∥ * ∥g∥ :
mul_le_mul f.norm_cont_linear_le g.norm_cont_linear_le
(norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
... ≤ ∥f∥ * ∥g∥ + ∥f 0∥ :
by { rw le_add_iff_nonneg_right, apply norm_nonneg, }, },
end
variables (𝕜 V W)
/-- The space of affine maps between two normed spaces is linearly isometric to the product of the
codomain with the space of linear maps, by taking the value of the affine map at `(0 : V)` and the
linear part. -/
def to_const_prod_continuous_linear_map : (V →A[𝕜] W) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] W × (V →L[𝕜] W) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ⟨f 0, f.cont_linear⟩,
inv_fun := λ p, p.2.to_continuous_affine_map + const 𝕜 V p.1,
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, rw f.decomp, simp, },
right_inv := by { rintros ⟨v, f⟩, ext; simp, },
map_add' := by simp,
map_smul' := by simp,
norm_map' := λ f, by simp [prod.norm_def, norm_def], }
@[simp] lemma to_const_prod_continuous_linear_map_fst (f : V →A[𝕜] W) :
(to_const_prod_continuous_linear_map 𝕜 V W f).fst = f 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_const_prod_continuous_linear_map_snd (f : V →A[𝕜] W) :
(to_const_prod_continuous_linear_map 𝕜 V W f).snd = f.cont_linear :=
rfl
end normed_space_structure
end continuous_affine_map
|
4b46c745bc45a93de83983f416597bbb244f54b4 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/analysis/p_series.lean | 8abfa7279cfee2238a411ef3a04ec28144840362 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,392 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.special_functions.pow
/-!
# Convergence of `p`-series
In this file we prove that the series `∑' k in ℕ, 1 / k ^ p` converges if and only if `p > 1`.
The proof is based on the
[Cauchy condensation test](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_condensation_test): `∑ k, f k`
converges if and only if so does `∑ k, 2 ^ k f (2 ^ k)`. We prove this test in
`nnreal.summable_condensed_iff` and `summable_condensed_iff_of_nonneg`, then use it to prove
`summable_one_div_rpow`. After this transformation, a `p`-series turns into a geometric series.
## TODO
It should be easy to generalize arguments to Schlömilch's generalization of the Cauchy condensation
test once we need it.
## Tags
p-series, Cauchy condensation test
-/
open filter
open_locale big_operators ennreal nnreal topological_space
/-!
### Cauchy condensation test
In this section we prove the Cauchy condensation test: for `f : ℕ → ℝ≥0` or `f : ℕ → ℝ`,
`∑ k, f k` converges if and only if so does `∑ k, 2 ^ k f (2 ^ k)`. Instead of giving a monolithic
proof, we split it into a series of lemmas with explicit estimates of partial sums of each series in
terms of the partial sums of the other series.
-/
namespace finset
variables {M : Type*} [ordered_add_comm_monoid M] {f : ℕ → M}
lemma le_sum_condensed' (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k in Ico 1 (2 ^ n), f k) ≤ ∑ k in range n, (2 ^ k) • f (2 ^ k) :=
begin
induction n with n ihn, { simp },
suffices : (∑ k in Ico (2 ^ n) (2 ^ (n + 1)), f k) ≤ (2 ^ n) • f (2 ^ n),
{ rw [sum_range_succ, ← sum_Ico_consecutive],
exact add_le_add ihn this,
exacts [n.one_le_two_pow, nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right zero_lt_two n.le_succ] },
have : ∀ k ∈ Ico (2 ^ n) (2 ^ (n + 1)), f k ≤ f (2 ^ n) :=
λ k hk, hf (pow_pos zero_lt_two _) (mem_Ico.mp hk).1,
convert sum_le_sum this,
simp [pow_succ, two_mul]
end
lemma le_sum_condensed (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k in range (2 ^ n), f k) ≤ f 0 + ∑ k in range n, (2 ^ k) • f (2 ^ k) :=
begin
convert add_le_add_left (le_sum_condensed' hf n) (f 0),
rw [← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ n.one_le_two_pow, sum_range_succ, sum_range_zero, zero_add]
end
lemma sum_condensed_le' (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 1 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k in range n, (2 ^ k) • f (2 ^ (k + 1))) ≤ ∑ k in Ico 2 (2 ^ n + 1), f k :=
begin
induction n with n ihn, { simp },
suffices : (2 ^ n) • f (2 ^ (n + 1)) ≤ ∑ k in Ico (2 ^ n + 1) (2 ^ (n + 1) + 1), f k,
{ rw [sum_range_succ, ← sum_Ico_consecutive],
exact add_le_add ihn this,
exacts [add_le_add_right n.one_le_two_pow _,
add_le_add_right (nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right zero_lt_two n.le_succ) _] },
have : ∀ k ∈ Ico (2 ^ n + 1) (2 ^ (n + 1) + 1), f (2 ^ (n + 1)) ≤ f k :=
λ k hk, hf (n.one_le_two_pow.trans_lt $ (nat.lt_succ_of_le le_rfl).trans_le (mem_Ico.mp hk).1)
(nat.le_of_lt_succ $ (mem_Ico.mp hk).2),
convert sum_le_sum this,
simp [pow_succ, two_mul]
end
lemma sum_condensed_le (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 1 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k in range (n + 1), (2 ^ k) • f (2 ^ k)) ≤ f 1 + 2 • ∑ k in Ico 2 (2 ^ n + 1), f k :=
begin
convert add_le_add_left (nsmul_le_nsmul_of_le_right (sum_condensed_le' hf n) 2) (f 1),
simp [sum_range_succ', add_comm, pow_succ, mul_nsmul, sum_nsmul]
end
end finset
namespace ennreal
variable {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma le_tsum_condensed (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) :
∑' k, f k ≤ f 0 + ∑' k : ℕ, (2 ^ k) * f (2 ^ k) :=
begin
rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat' (nat.tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt _root_.one_lt_two)],
refine supr_le (λ n, (finset.le_sum_condensed hf n).trans (add_le_add_left _ _)),
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, nat.cast_pow, nat.cast_two],
apply ennreal.sum_le_tsum
end
lemma tsum_condensed_le (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 1 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) :
∑' k : ℕ, (2 ^ k * f (2 ^ k)) ≤ f 1 + 2 * ∑' k, f k :=
begin
rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat' (tendsto_at_top_mono nat.le_succ tendsto_id), two_mul, ← two_nsmul],
refine supr_le (λ n, le_trans _ (add_le_add_left (nsmul_le_nsmul_of_le_right
(ennreal.sum_le_tsum $ finset.Ico 2 (2^n + 1)) _) _)),
simpa using finset.sum_condensed_le hf n
end
end ennreal
namespace nnreal
/-- Cauchy condensation test for a series of `nnreal` version. -/
lemma summable_condensed_iff {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} (hf : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) :
summable (λ k : ℕ, (2 ^ k) * f (2 ^ k)) ↔ summable f :=
begin
simp only [← ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, ne.def, not_iff_not, ennreal.coe_mul,
ennreal.coe_pow, ennreal.coe_two],
split; intro h,
{ replace hf : ∀ m n, 1 < m → m ≤ n → (f n : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ f m :=
λ m n hm hmn, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 (hf (zero_lt_one.trans hm) hmn),
simpa [h, ennreal.add_eq_top] using (ennreal.tsum_condensed_le hf) },
{ replace hf : ∀ m n, 0 < m → m ≤ n → (f n : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ f m :=
λ m n hm hmn, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 (hf hm hmn),
simpa [h, ennreal.add_eq_top] using (ennreal.le_tsum_condensed hf) }
end
end nnreal
/-- Cauchy condensation test for series of nonnegative real numbers. -/
lemma summable_condensed_iff_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (h_nonneg : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n)
(h_mono : ∀ ⦃m n⦄, 0 < m → m ≤ n → f n ≤ f m) :
summable (λ k : ℕ, (2 ^ k) * f (2 ^ k)) ↔ summable f :=
begin
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using h_nonneg,
simp only [nnreal.coe_le_coe] at *,
exact_mod_cast nnreal.summable_condensed_iff h_mono
end
open real
/-!
### Convergence of the `p`-series
In this section we prove that for a real number `p`, the series `∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n ^ p)` converges if
and only if `1 < p`. There are many different proofs of this fact. The proof in this file uses the
Cauchy condensation test we formalized above. This test implies that `∑ n, 1 / (n ^ p)` converges if
and only if `∑ n, 2 ^ n / ((2 ^ n) ^ p)` converges, and the latter series is a geometric series with
common ratio `2 ^ {1 - p}`. -/
/-- Test for convergence of the `p`-series: the real-valued series `∑' n : ℕ, (n ^ p)⁻¹` converges
if and only if `1 < p`. -/
@[simp] lemma real.summable_nat_rpow_inv {p : ℝ} : summable (λ n, (n ^ p)⁻¹ : ℕ → ℝ) ↔ 1 < p :=
begin
cases le_or_lt 0 p with hp hp,
/- Cauchy condensation test applies only to antitone sequences, so we consider the
cases `0 ≤ p` and `p < 0` separately. -/
{ rw ← summable_condensed_iff_of_nonneg,
{ simp_rw [nat.cast_pow, nat.cast_two, ← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul zero_lt_two.le, mul_comm _ p,
rpow_mul zero_lt_two.le, rpow_nat_cast, ← inv_pow₀, ← mul_pow,
summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_1],
nth_rewrite 0 [← rpow_one 2],
rw [← division_def, ← rpow_sub zero_lt_two, norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos zero_lt_two _), rpow_lt_one_iff zero_lt_two.le],
norm_num },
{ intro n,
exact inv_nonneg.2 (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg _) },
{ intros m n hm hmn,
exact inv_le_inv_of_le (rpow_pos_of_pos (nat.cast_pos.2 hm) _)
(rpow_le_rpow m.cast_nonneg (nat.cast_le.2 hmn) hp) } },
/- If `p < 0`, then `1 / n ^ p` tends to infinity, thus the series diverges. -/
{ suffices : ¬summable (λ n, (n ^ p)⁻¹ : ℕ → ℝ),
{ have : ¬(1 < p) := λ hp₁, hp.not_le (zero_le_one.trans hp₁.le),
simpa [this, -one_div] },
{ intro h,
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk₁ : ((k ^ p)⁻¹ : ℝ) < 1, hk₀ : k ≠ 0⟩ :=
((h.tendsto_cofinite_zero.eventually (gt_mem_nhds zero_lt_one)).and
(eventually_cofinite_ne 0)).exists,
apply hk₀,
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero, ← @nat.cast_pos ℝ] at hk₀,
simpa [inv_lt_one_iff_of_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hk₀ _), one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos hk₀, hp,
hp.not_lt, hk₀] using hk₁ } }
end
@[simp] lemma real.summable_nat_rpow {p : ℝ} : summable (λ n, n ^ p : ℕ → ℝ) ↔ p < -1 :=
by { rcases neg_surjective p with ⟨p, rfl⟩, simp [rpow_neg] }
/-- Test for convergence of the `p`-series: the real-valued series `∑' n : ℕ, 1 / n ^ p` converges
if and only if `1 < p`. -/
lemma real.summable_one_div_nat_rpow {p : ℝ} : summable (λ n, 1 / n ^ p : ℕ → ℝ) ↔ 1 < p :=
by simp
/-- Test for convergence of the `p`-series: the real-valued series `∑' n : ℕ, (n ^ p)⁻¹` converges
if and only if `1 < p`. -/
@[simp] lemma real.summable_nat_pow_inv {p : ℕ} : summable (λ n, (n ^ p)⁻¹ : ℕ → ℝ) ↔ 1 < p :=
by simp only [← rpow_nat_cast, real.summable_nat_rpow_inv, nat.one_lt_cast]
/-- Test for convergence of the `p`-series: the real-valued series `∑' n : ℕ, 1 / n ^ p` converges
if and only if `1 < p`. -/
lemma real.summable_one_div_nat_pow {p : ℕ} : summable (λ n, 1 / n ^ p : ℕ → ℝ) ↔ 1 < p :=
by simp
/-- Harmonic series is not unconditionally summable. -/
lemma real.not_summable_nat_cast_inv : ¬summable (λ n, n⁻¹ : ℕ → ℝ) :=
have ¬summable (λ n, (n^1)⁻¹ : ℕ → ℝ), from mt real.summable_nat_pow_inv.1 (lt_irrefl 1),
by simpa
/-- Harmonic series is not unconditionally summable. -/
lemma real.not_summable_one_div_nat_cast : ¬summable (λ n, 1 / n : ℕ → ℝ) :=
by simpa only [inv_eq_one_div] using real.not_summable_nat_cast_inv
/-- **Divergence of the Harmonic Series** -/
lemma real.tendsto_sum_range_one_div_nat_succ_at_top :
tendsto (λ n, ∑ i in finset.range n, (1 / (i + 1) : ℝ)) at_top at_top :=
begin
rw ← not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_at_top_of_nonneg,
{ exact_mod_cast mt (summable_nat_add_iff 1).1 real.not_summable_one_div_nat_cast },
{ exact λ i, div_nonneg zero_le_one i.cast_add_one_pos.le }
end
@[simp] lemma nnreal.summable_rpow_inv {p : ℝ} : summable (λ n, (n ^ p)⁻¹ : ℕ → ℝ≥0) ↔ 1 < p :=
by simp [← nnreal.summable_coe]
@[simp] lemma nnreal.summable_rpow {p : ℝ} : summable (λ n, n ^ p : ℕ → ℝ≥0) ↔ p < -1 :=
by simp [← nnreal.summable_coe]
lemma nnreal.summable_one_div_rpow {p : ℝ} : summable (λ n, 1 / n ^ p : ℕ → ℝ≥0) ↔ 1 < p :=
by simp
|
6bd1a308d07f1a3fdeb2ebbcb4411e5d82a9725b | 5883d9218e6f144e20eee6ca1dab8529fa1a97c0 | /src/aeq/type.lean | 98eff94d631777450867748d0a0a0c162a0b626a | [] | no_license | spl/alpha-conversion-is-easy | 0d035bc570e52a6345d4890e4d0c9e3f9b8126c1 | ed937fe85d8495daffd9412a5524c77b9fcda094 | refs/heads/master | 1,607,649,280,020 | 1,517,380,240,000 | 1,517,380,240,000 | 52,174,747 | 4 | 0 | null | 1,456,052,226,000 | 1,456,001,163,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,118 | lean | /-
This file contains the `aeq` data type.
We put the data type in its own file because it takes a long time to compile and
we want Lean to cache the results.
-/
import exp
import vrel
namespace acie -----------------------------------------------------------------
variables {V : Type} [decidable_eq V] -- Type of variable names
variables {vs : Type → Type} [vset vs V] -- Type of variable name sets
/-
`aeq R e₁ e₂` is an inductive data type that relates `e₁ : exp X` and `e₂ : exp
Y` via their free variables with `R : X ×ν Y`.
-/
inductive aeq : Π {X Y : vs V}, X ×ν Y → exp X → exp Y → Prop
| var : Π {X Y : vs V} {R : X ×ν Y} {x : ν∈ X} {y : ν∈ Y}, ⟪x, y⟫ ∈ν R → aeq R (exp.var x) (exp.var y)
| app : Π {X Y : vs V} {R : X ×ν Y} {fX eX : exp X} {fY eY : exp Y}, aeq R fX fY → aeq R eX eY → aeq R (exp.app fX eX) (exp.app fY eY)
| lam : Π {X Y : vs V} {R : X ×ν Y} {a b : V} {eX : exp (insert a X)} {eY : exp (insert b Y)}, aeq (R ⩁ (a, b)) eX eY → aeq R (exp.lam eX) (exp.lam eY)
-- Notation for `aeq`.
notation e₁ ` ≡α⟨`:50 R `⟩ ` e₂:50 := aeq R e₁ e₂
namespace aeq ------------------------------------------------------------------
variables {X Y : vs V} -- Variable name sets
variables {R : X ×ν Y} -- Variable name set relations
section ------------------------------------------------------------------------
variables {x : ν∈ X} {y : ν∈ Y} -- Variable name set members
protected
def var.prop : aeq R (exp.var x) (exp.var y) → ⟪x, y⟫ ∈ν R
| (var p) := p
end /- section -/ --------------------------------------------------------------
section ------------------------------------------------------------------------
variables {fX eX : exp X} {fY eY : exp Y} -- Expressions
protected
def app.fun : aeq R (exp.app fX eX) (exp.app fY eY) → aeq R fX fY
| (app f e) := f
protected
def app.arg : aeq R (exp.app fX eX) (exp.app fY eY) → aeq R eX eY
| (app f e) := e
end /- section -/ --------------------------------------------------------------
section ------------------------------------------------------------------------
variables {a b : V} -- Variable names
variables {eX : exp (insert a X)} {eY : exp (insert b Y)} -- Expressions
protected
def lam.body : aeq R (exp.lam eX) (exp.lam eY) → aeq (R ⩁ (a, b)) eX eY
| (lam e) := e
end /- section -/ --------------------------------------------------------------
open decidable
instance decidable (R : X ×ν Y) [d : ∀ x y, decidable (⟪x, y⟫ ∈ν R)]
(e₁ : exp X) (e₂ : exp Y)
: decidable (e₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ e₂) :=
begin
induction e₁ with
/- var -/ X x
/- app -/ X f₁ e₁ rf re
/- lam -/ X a e₁ r
generalizing Y R d e₂,
begin /- var -/
cases e₂ with
/- var -/ Y y
/- app -/ Y f₂ e₂
/- lam -/ Y b e₂,
begin /- var -/
cases d x y with not_x_R_y x_R_y,
begin /- not_x_R_y : ¬R x y -/
exact is_false (not_x_R_y ∘ var.prop)
end,
begin /- x_R_y : R x y -/
exact is_true (var x_R_y)
end
end,
begin /- app -/
exact is_false (λ h, by cases h)
end,
begin /- lam -/
exact is_false (λ h, by cases h)
end
end,
begin /- app -/
cases e₂ with
/- var -/ Y y
/- app -/ Y f₂ e₂
/- lam -/ Y b e₂,
begin /- var -/
exact is_false (λ h, by cases h)
end,
begin /- app -/
have hf : decidable (f₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ f₂) := rf R f₂,
cases hf with hf_f hf_t,
begin /- hf_f : ¬f₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ f₂ -/
exact is_false (hf_f ∘ app.fun)
end,
begin /- hf_t : f₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ f₂ -/
have he : decidable (e₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ e₂) := re R e₂,
cases he with he_f he_t,
begin /- he_f : ¬e₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ e₂ -/
exact is_false (he_f ∘ app.arg)
end,
begin /- he_t : e₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ e₂ -/
exact is_true (app hf_t he_t)
end
end
end,
begin /- lam -/
exact is_false (λ h, by cases h)
end
end,
begin /- lam -/
cases e₂ with
/- var -/ Y y
/- app -/ Y f₂ e₂
/- lam -/ Y b e₂,
begin /- var -/
exact is_false (λ h, by cases h)
end,
begin /- app -/
exact is_false (λ h, by cases h)
end,
begin /- lam -/
have he : decidable (e₁ ≡α⟨R ⩁ (a, b)⟩ e₂) := r (R ⩁ (a, b)) e₂,
cases he with he_f he_t,
begin /- he_f : ¬e₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ e₂ -/
exact is_false (he_f ∘ lam.body)
end,
begin /- he_t : e₁ ≡α⟨R⟩ e₂ -/
exact is_true (lam he_t)
end
end
end
end
end /- namespace -/ aeq --------------------------------------------------------
end /- namespace -/ acie -------------------------------------------------------
|
e8f2724b010026a48e5d347f34f814d12c2cd6a5 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/group_power/order.lean | d16d94f5abb1bcd19ffb46be5bcd8ecd8f9b800d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,488 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import algebra.order.ring.abs
import algebra.order.with_zero
import algebra.group_power.ring
import data.set.intervals.basic
/-!
# Lemmas about the interaction of power operations with order
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Note that some lemmas are in `algebra/group_power/lemmas.lean` as they import files which
depend on this file.
-/
open function
variables {β A G M R : Type*}
section monoid
variable [monoid M]
section preorder
variable [preorder M]
section left
variables [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)] {x : M}
@[to_additive nsmul_le_nsmul_of_le_right, mono]
lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_left' [covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (≤)] {a b : M} (hab : a ≤ b) :
∀ i : ℕ, a ^ i ≤ b ^ i
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := by { rw [pow_succ, pow_succ],
exact mul_le_mul' hab (pow_le_pow_of_le_left' k) }
attribute [mono] nsmul_le_nsmul_of_le_right
@[to_additive nsmul_nonneg]
theorem one_le_pow_of_one_le' {a : M} (H : 1 ≤ a) : ∀ n : ℕ, 1 ≤ a ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (k + 1) := by { rw pow_succ, exact one_le_mul H (one_le_pow_of_one_le' k) }
@[to_additive nsmul_nonpos]
lemma pow_le_one' {a : M} (H : a ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n ≤ 1 := @one_le_pow_of_one_le' Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ H n
@[to_additive nsmul_le_nsmul]
theorem pow_le_pow' {a : M} {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := nat.le.dest h in
calc a ^ n ≤ a ^ n * a ^ k : le_mul_of_one_le_right' (one_le_pow_of_one_le' ha _)
... = a ^ m : by rw [← hk, pow_add]
@[to_additive nsmul_le_nsmul_of_nonpos]
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_one' {a : M} {n m : ℕ} (ha : a ≤ 1) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ m ≤ a ^ n :=
@pow_le_pow' Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ ha h
@[to_additive nsmul_pos]
theorem one_lt_pow' {a : M} (ha : 1 < a) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 < a ^ k :=
begin
rcases nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hk with ⟨l, rfl⟩,
clear hk,
induction l with l IH,
{ simpa using ha },
{ rw pow_succ,
exact one_lt_mul'' ha IH }
end
@[to_additive nsmul_neg]
lemma pow_lt_one' {a : M} (ha : a < 1) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : a ^ k < 1 :=
@one_lt_pow' Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ ha k hk
@[to_additive nsmul_lt_nsmul]
theorem pow_lt_pow' [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] {a : M} {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 < a) (h : n < m) :
a ^ n < a ^ m :=
begin
rcases nat.le.dest h with ⟨k, rfl⟩, clear h,
rw [pow_add, pow_succ', mul_assoc, ← pow_succ],
exact lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' _ (one_lt_pow' ha k.succ_ne_zero)
end
@[to_additive nsmul_strict_mono_right]
lemma pow_strict_mono_left [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] {a : M} (ha : 1 < a) :
strict_mono ((^) a : ℕ → M) :=
λ m n, pow_lt_pow' ha
@[to_additive left.pow_nonneg]
lemma left.one_le_pow_of_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 1 ≤ x^n
| 0 := (pow_zero x).ge
| (n + 1) := by { rw pow_succ, exact left.one_le_mul hx left.one_le_pow_of_le }
@[to_additive left.pow_nonpos]
lemma left.pow_le_one_of_le (hx : x ≤ 1) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, x^n ≤ 1
| 0 := (pow_zero _).le
| (n + 1) := by { rw pow_succ, exact left.mul_le_one hx left.pow_le_one_of_le }
end left
section right
variables [covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (≤)] {x : M}
@[to_additive right.pow_nonneg]
lemma right.one_le_pow_of_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 1 ≤ x^n
| 0 := (pow_zero _).ge
| (n + 1) := by { rw pow_succ, exact right.one_le_mul hx right.one_le_pow_of_le }
@[to_additive right.pow_nonpos]
lemma right.pow_le_one_of_le (hx : x ≤ 1) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, x^n ≤ 1
| 0 := (pow_zero _).le
| (n + 1) := by { rw pow_succ, exact right.mul_le_one hx right.pow_le_one_of_le }
end right
section covariant_lt_swap
variables [preorder β] [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] [covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (<)]
{f : β → M}
@[to_additive strict_mono.nsmul_left]
lemma strict_mono.pow_right' (hf : strict_mono f) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → strict_mono (λ a, f a ^ n)
| 0 hn := (hn rfl).elim
| 1 hn := by simpa
| (nat.succ $ nat.succ n) hn :=
by { simp_rw pow_succ _ (n + 1), exact hf.mul' (strict_mono.pow_right' n.succ_ne_zero) }
/-- See also `pow_strict_mono_right` -/
@[nolint to_additive_doc, to_additive nsmul_strict_mono_left]
lemma pow_strict_mono_right' {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : strict_mono (λ a : M, a ^ n) :=
strict_mono_id.pow_right' hn
end covariant_lt_swap
section covariant_le_swap
variables [preorder β] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)] [covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (≤)]
@[to_additive monotone.nsmul_left]
lemma monotone.pow_right {f : β → M} (hf : monotone f) : ∀ n : ℕ, monotone (λ a, f a ^ n)
| 0 := by simpa using monotone_const
| (n + 1) := by { simp_rw pow_succ, exact hf.mul' (monotone.pow_right _) }
@[to_additive nsmul_mono_left]
lemma pow_mono_right (n : ℕ) : monotone (λ a : M, a ^ n) := monotone_id.pow_right _
end covariant_le_swap
@[to_additive left.pow_neg]
lemma left.pow_lt_one_of_lt [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] {n : ℕ} {x : M} (hn : 0 < n) (h : x < 1) :
x^n < 1 :=
nat.le_induction ((pow_one _).trans_lt h) (λ n _ ih, by { rw pow_succ, exact mul_lt_one h ih }) _
(nat.succ_le_iff.2 hn)
@[to_additive right.pow_neg]
lemma right.pow_lt_one_of_lt [covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (<)] {n : ℕ} {x : M}
(hn : 0 < n) (h : x < 1) :
x^n < 1 :=
nat.le_induction ((pow_one _).trans_lt h)
(λ n _ ih, by { rw pow_succ, exact right.mul_lt_one h ih }) _ (nat.succ_le_iff.2 hn)
end preorder
section linear_order
variables [linear_order M]
section covariant_le
variables [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)]
@[to_additive nsmul_nonneg_iff]
lemma one_le_pow_iff {x : M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ n ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt $ λ h, pow_lt_one' h hn, λ h, one_le_pow_of_one_le' h n⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_le_one_iff {x : M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : x ^ n ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 1 :=
@one_le_pow_iff Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ hn
@[to_additive nsmul_pos_iff]
lemma one_lt_pow_iff {x : M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : 1 < x ^ n ↔ 1 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (pow_le_one_iff hn)
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_lt_one_iff {x : M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : x ^ n < 1 ↔ x < 1 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (one_le_pow_iff hn)
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_eq_one_iff {x : M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : x ^ n = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pow_le_one_iff hn, one_le_pow_iff hn]
variables [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] {a : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive nsmul_le_nsmul_iff]
lemma pow_le_pow_iff' (ha : 1 < a) : a ^ m ≤ a ^ n ↔ m ≤ n := (pow_strict_mono_left ha).le_iff_le
@[to_additive nsmul_lt_nsmul_iff]
lemma pow_lt_pow_iff' (ha : 1 < a) : a ^ m < a ^ n ↔ m < n := (pow_strict_mono_left ha).lt_iff_lt
end covariant_le
section covariant_le_swap
variables [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)] [covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (≤)]
@[to_additive lt_of_nsmul_lt_nsmul]
lemma lt_of_pow_lt_pow' {a b : M} (n : ℕ) : a ^ n < b ^ n → a < b := (pow_mono_right _).reflect_lt
@[to_additive]
lemma min_lt_max_of_mul_lt_mul {a b c d : M} (h : a * b < c * d) : min a b < max c d :=
lt_of_pow_lt_pow' 2 $ by { simp_rw pow_two, exact (mul_le_mul' inf_le_left
inf_le_right).trans_lt (h.trans_le $ mul_le_mul' le_sup_left le_sup_right) }
@[to_additive min_lt_of_add_lt_two_nsmul]
lemma min_lt_of_mul_lt_sq {a b c : M} (h : a * b < c ^ 2) : min a b < c :=
by simpa using min_lt_max_of_mul_lt_mul (h.trans_eq $ pow_two _)
@[to_additive lt_max_of_two_nsmul_lt_add]
lemma lt_max_of_sq_lt_mul {a b c : M} (h : a ^ 2 < b * c) : a < max b c :=
by simpa using min_lt_max_of_mul_lt_mul ((pow_two _).symm.trans_lt h)
end covariant_le_swap
section covariant_lt_swap
variables [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] [covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (<)]
@[to_additive le_of_nsmul_le_nsmul]
lemma le_of_pow_le_pow' {a b : M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≤ b ^ n → a ≤ b :=
(pow_strict_mono_right' hn).le_iff_le.1
@[to_additive min_le_of_add_le_two_nsmul]
lemma min_le_of_mul_le_sq {a b c : M} (h : a * b ≤ c ^ 2) : min a b ≤ c :=
by simpa using min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul (h.trans_eq $ pow_two _)
@[to_additive le_max_of_two_nsmul_le_add]
lemma le_max_of_sq_le_mul {a b c : M} (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b * c) : a ≤ max b c :=
by simpa using min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul ((pow_two _).symm.trans_le h)
end covariant_lt_swap
@[to_additive left.nsmul_neg_iff]
lemma left.pow_lt_one_iff [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] {n : ℕ} {x : M} (hn : 0 < n) :
x^n < 1 ↔ x < 1 :=
by { haveI := has_mul.to_covariant_class_left M, exact pow_lt_one_iff hn.ne' }
@[to_additive right.nsmul_neg_iff]
lemma right.pow_lt_one_iff [covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (<)] {n : ℕ} {x : M} (hn : 0 < n) :
x^n < 1 ↔ x < 1 :=
⟨λ H, not_le.mp $ λ k, H.not_le $ by { haveI := has_mul.to_covariant_class_right M,
exact right.one_le_pow_of_le k }, right.pow_lt_one_of_lt hn⟩
end linear_order
end monoid
section div_inv_monoid
variables [div_inv_monoid G] [preorder G] [covariant_class G G (*) (≤)]
@[to_additive zsmul_nonneg]
theorem one_le_zpow {x : G} (H : 1 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 ≤ n) :
1 ≤ x ^ n :=
begin
lift n to ℕ using hn,
rw zpow_coe_nat,
apply one_le_pow_of_one_le' H,
end
end div_inv_monoid
namespace canonically_ordered_comm_semiring
variables [canonically_ordered_comm_semiring R]
theorem pow_pos {a : R} (H : 0 < a) (n : ℕ) : 0 < a ^ n :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ pow_ne_zero _ H.ne'
end canonically_ordered_comm_semiring
section ordered_semiring
variables [ordered_semiring R] {a x y : R} {n m : ℕ}
lemma zero_pow_le_one : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : R) ^ n ≤ 1
| 0 := (pow_zero _).le
| (n + 1) := by { rw [zero_pow n.succ_pos], exact zero_le_one }
theorem pow_add_pow_le (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hn : n ≠ 0) : x ^ n + y ^ n ≤ (x + y) ^ n :=
begin
rcases nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
induction k with k ih, { simp only [pow_one] },
let n := k.succ,
have h1 := add_nonneg (mul_nonneg hx (pow_nonneg hy n)) (mul_nonneg hy (pow_nonneg hx n)),
have h2 := add_nonneg hx hy,
calc x^n.succ + y^n.succ
≤ x*x^n + y*y^n + (x*y^n + y*x^n) :
by { rw [pow_succ _ n, pow_succ _ n], exact le_add_of_nonneg_right h1 }
... = (x+y) * (x^n + y^n) :
by rw [add_mul, mul_add, mul_add, add_comm (y*x^n), ← add_assoc,
← add_assoc, add_assoc (x*x^n) (x*y^n), add_comm (x*y^n) (y*y^n), ← add_assoc]
... ≤ (x+y)^n.succ :
by { rw [pow_succ _ n], exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (ih (nat.succ_ne_zero k)) h2 }
end
lemma pow_le_one : ∀ (n : ℕ) (h₀ : 0 ≤ a) (h₁ : a ≤ 1), a ^ n ≤ 1
| 0 h₀ h₁ := (pow_zero a).le
| (n + 1) h₀ h₁ := (pow_succ' a n).le.trans (mul_le_one (pow_le_one n h₀ h₁) h₀ h₁)
lemma pow_lt_one (h₀ : 0 ≤ a) (h₁ : a < 1) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0), a ^ n < 1
| 0 h := (h rfl).elim
| (n + 1) h :=
by { rw pow_succ, exact mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_left h₀ h₁ (pow_le_one _ h₀ h₁.le) }
theorem one_le_pow_of_one_le (H : 1 ≤ a) : ∀ (n : ℕ), 1 ≤ a ^ n
| 0 := by rw [pow_zero]
| (n+1) := by { rw pow_succ, simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul H (one_le_pow_of_one_le n)
zero_le_one (le_trans zero_le_one H) }
lemma pow_mono (h : 1 ≤ a) : monotone (λ n : ℕ, a ^ n) :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ $ λ n,
by { rw pow_succ, exact le_mul_of_one_le_left (pow_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans h) _) h }
theorem pow_le_pow (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
pow_mono ha h
theorem le_self_pow (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : m ≠ 0) : a ≤ a ^ m :=
(pow_one a).symm.trans_le (pow_le_pow ha $ pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr h)
@[mono] lemma pow_le_pow_of_le_left {a b : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ i : ℕ, a^i ≤ b^i
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := by { rw [pow_succ, pow_succ],
exact mul_le_mul hab (pow_le_pow_of_le_left _) (pow_nonneg ha _) (le_trans ha hab) }
lemma one_lt_pow (ha : 1 < a) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0), 1 < a ^ n
| 0 h := (h rfl).elim
| (n + 1) h :=
by { rw pow_succ, exact one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le ha (one_le_pow_of_one_le ha.le _) }
end ordered_semiring
section strict_ordered_semiring
variables [strict_ordered_semiring R] {a x y : R} {n m : ℕ}
lemma pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left (h : x < y) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → x ^ n < y ^ n
| 0 hn := hn.false.elim
| (n + 1) _ := by simpa only [pow_succ'] using
mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_le' (pow_le_pow_of_le_left hx h.le _) h (pow_pos (hx.trans_lt h) _) hx
lemma strict_mono_on_pow (hn : 0 < n) : strict_mono_on (λ x : R, x ^ n) (set.Ici 0) :=
λ x hx y hy h, pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left h hx hn
lemma pow_strict_mono_right (h : 1 < a) : strict_mono (λ n : ℕ, a ^ n) :=
have 0 < a := zero_le_one.trans_lt h,
strict_mono_nat_of_lt_succ $ λ n, by simpa only [one_mul, pow_succ]
using mul_lt_mul h (le_refl (a ^ n)) (pow_pos this _) this.le
lemma pow_lt_pow (h : 1 < a) (h2 : n < m) : a ^ n < a ^ m :=
pow_strict_mono_right h h2
lemma pow_lt_pow_iff (h : 1 < a) : a ^ n < a ^ m ↔ n < m :=
(pow_strict_mono_right h).lt_iff_lt
lemma pow_le_pow_iff (h : 1 < a) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m ↔ n ≤ m :=
(pow_strict_mono_right h).le_iff_le
lemma strict_anti_pow (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) : strict_anti (λ n : ℕ, a ^ n) :=
strict_anti_nat_of_succ_lt $ λ n,
by simpa only [pow_succ, one_mul] using mul_lt_mul h₁ le_rfl (pow_pos h₀ n) zero_le_one
lemma pow_lt_pow_iff_of_lt_one (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) : a ^ m < a ^ n ↔ n < m :=
(strict_anti_pow h₀ h₁).lt_iff_lt
lemma pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one (h : 0 < a) (ha : a < 1) {i j : ℕ} (hij : i < j) : a ^ j < a ^ i :=
(pow_lt_pow_iff_of_lt_one h ha).2 hij
lemma pow_lt_self_of_lt_one (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) (hn : 1 < n) : a ^ n < a :=
calc a ^ n < a ^ 1 : pow_lt_pow_of_lt_one h₀ h₁ hn
... = a : pow_one _
lemma sq_pos_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ 2 := by { rw sq, exact mul_pos ha ha }
end strict_ordered_semiring
section strict_ordered_ring
variables [strict_ordered_ring R] {a : R}
lemma pow_bit0_pos_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (n : ℕ) : 0 < a ^ bit0 n :=
begin
rw pow_bit0',
exact pow_pos (mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg ha ha) _,
end
lemma pow_bit1_neg (ha : a < 0) (n : ℕ) : a ^ bit1 n < 0 :=
begin
rw [bit1, pow_succ],
exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos ha (pow_bit0_pos_of_neg ha n),
end
lemma sq_pos_of_neg (ha : a < 0) : 0 < a ^ 2 := pow_bit0_pos_of_neg ha _
end strict_ordered_ring
section linear_ordered_semiring
variables [linear_ordered_semiring R] {a b : R}
lemma pow_le_one_iff_of_nonneg {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
begin
refine ⟨_, pow_le_one n ha⟩,
rw [←not_lt, ←not_lt],
exact mt (λ h, one_lt_pow h hn),
end
lemma one_le_pow_iff_of_nonneg {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ a ^ n ↔ 1 ≤ a :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, one_le_pow_of_one_le h n⟩,
rw [←not_lt, ←not_lt],
exact mt (λ h, pow_lt_one ha h hn),
end
lemma one_lt_pow_iff_of_nonneg {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : 1 < a ^ n ↔ 1 < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (pow_le_one_iff_of_nonneg ha hn)
lemma pow_lt_one_iff_of_nonneg {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (one_le_pow_iff_of_nonneg ha hn)
lemma sq_le_one_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : a^2 ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
pow_le_one_iff_of_nonneg ha (nat.succ_ne_zero _)
lemma sq_lt_one_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : a^2 < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
pow_lt_one_iff_of_nonneg ha (nat.succ_ne_zero _)
lemma one_le_sq_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 1 ≤ a^2 ↔ 1 ≤ a :=
one_le_pow_iff_of_nonneg ha (nat.succ_ne_zero _)
lemma one_lt_sq_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 1 < a^2 ↔ 1 < a :=
one_lt_pow_iff_of_nonneg ha (nat.succ_ne_zero _)
@[simp] theorem pow_left_inj {x y : R} {n : ℕ} (Hxpos : 0 ≤ x) (Hypos : 0 ≤ y) (Hnpos : 0 < n) :
x ^ n = y ^ n ↔ x = y :=
(@strict_mono_on_pow R _ _ Hnpos).eq_iff_eq Hxpos Hypos
lemma lt_of_pow_lt_pow {a b : R} (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ^ n < b ^ n) : a < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn, not_lt_of_ge (pow_le_pow_of_le_left hb hn _) h
lemma le_of_pow_le_pow {a b : R} (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) (h : a ^ n ≤ b ^ n) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_not_lt $ λ h1, not_le_of_lt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left h1 hb hn) h
@[simp] lemma sq_eq_sq {a b : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ a = b :=
pow_left_inj ha hb dec_trivial
lemma lt_of_mul_self_lt_mul_self (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a * a < b * b → a < b :=
by { simp_rw ←sq, exact lt_of_pow_lt_pow _ hb }
end linear_ordered_semiring
section linear_ordered_ring
variable [linear_ordered_ring R]
lemma pow_abs (a : R) (n : ℕ) : |a| ^ n = |a ^ n| :=
((abs_hom.to_monoid_hom : R →* R).map_pow a n).symm
lemma abs_neg_one_pow (n : ℕ) : |(-1 : R) ^ n| = 1 :=
by rw [←pow_abs, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
lemma abs_pow_eq_one (a : R) {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) :
|a ^ n| = 1 ↔ |a| = 1 :=
by { convert pow_left_inj (abs_nonneg a) zero_le_one h,
exacts [(pow_abs _ _).symm, (one_pow _).symm] }
theorem pow_bit0_nonneg (a : R) (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ a ^ bit0 n :=
by { rw pow_bit0, exact mul_self_nonneg _ }
theorem sq_nonneg (a : R) : 0 ≤ a ^ 2 :=
pow_bit0_nonneg a 1
alias sq_nonneg ← pow_two_nonneg
theorem pow_bit0_pos {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : 0 < a ^ bit0 n :=
(pow_bit0_nonneg a n).lt_of_ne (pow_ne_zero _ h).symm
theorem sq_pos_of_ne_zero (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ 2 :=
pow_bit0_pos h 1
alias sq_pos_of_ne_zero ← pow_two_pos_of_ne_zero
theorem pow_bit0_pos_iff (a : R) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ bit0 n ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, pow_bit0_pos h n⟩,
rintro rfl,
rw zero_pow (nat.zero_lt_bit0 hn) at h,
exact lt_irrefl _ h,
end
theorem sq_pos_iff (a : R) : 0 < a ^ 2 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pow_bit0_pos_iff a one_ne_zero
variables {x y : R}
theorem sq_abs (x : R) : |x| ^ 2 = x ^ 2 :=
by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_abs_self x
theorem abs_sq (x : R) : |x ^ 2| = x ^ 2 :=
by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_self x
theorem sq_lt_sq : x ^ 2 < y ^ 2 ↔ |x| < |y| :=
by simpa only [sq_abs]
using (@strict_mono_on_pow R _ _ two_pos).lt_iff_lt (abs_nonneg x) (abs_nonneg y)
theorem sq_lt_sq' (h1 : -y < x) (h2 : x < y) : x ^ 2 < y ^ 2 :=
sq_lt_sq.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (abs_lt.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
theorem sq_le_sq : x ^ 2 ≤ y ^ 2 ↔ |x| ≤ |y| :=
by simpa only [sq_abs]
using (@strict_mono_on_pow R _ _ two_pos).le_iff_le (abs_nonneg x) (abs_nonneg y)
theorem sq_le_sq' (h1 : -y ≤ x) (h2 : x ≤ y) : x ^ 2 ≤ y ^ 2 :=
sq_le_sq.2 (le_trans (abs_le.mpr ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
theorem abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq (h : x^2 < y^2) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : |x| < y :=
by rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hy, ← sq_lt_sq]
theorem abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq' (h : x^2 < y^2) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : -y < x ∧ x < y :=
abs_lt.mp $ abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq h hy
theorem abs_le_of_sq_le_sq (h : x^2 ≤ y^2) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : |x| ≤ y :=
by rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hy, ← sq_le_sq]
theorem abs_le_of_sq_le_sq' (h : x^2 ≤ y^2) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : -y ≤ x ∧ x ≤ y :=
abs_le.mp $ abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hy
lemma sq_eq_sq_iff_abs_eq_abs (x y : R) : x^2 = y^2 ↔ |x| = |y| :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, sq_le_sq]
@[simp] lemma sq_le_one_iff_abs_le_one (x : R) : x^2 ≤ 1 ↔ |x| ≤ 1 :=
by simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using @sq_le_sq _ _ x 1
@[simp] lemma sq_lt_one_iff_abs_lt_one (x : R) : x^2 < 1 ↔ |x| < 1 :=
by simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using @sq_lt_sq _ _ x 1
@[simp] lemma one_le_sq_iff_one_le_abs (x : R) : 1 ≤ x^2 ↔ 1 ≤ |x| :=
by simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using @sq_le_sq _ _ 1 x
@[simp] lemma one_lt_sq_iff_one_lt_abs (x : R) : 1 < x^2 ↔ 1 < |x| :=
by simpa only [one_pow, abs_one] using @sq_lt_sq _ _ 1 x
lemma pow_four_le_pow_two_of_pow_two_le {x y : R} (h : x^2 ≤ y) : x^4 ≤ y^2 :=
(pow_mul x 2 2).symm ▸ pow_le_pow_of_le_left (sq_nonneg x) h 2
end linear_ordered_ring
section linear_ordered_comm_ring
variables [linear_ordered_comm_ring R]
/-- Arithmetic mean-geometric mean (AM-GM) inequality for linearly ordered commutative rings. -/
lemma two_mul_le_add_sq (a b : R) : 2 * a * b ≤ a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 :=
sub_nonneg.mp ((sub_add_eq_add_sub _ _ _).subst ((sub_sq a b).subst (sq_nonneg _)))
alias two_mul_le_add_sq ← two_mul_le_add_pow_two
end linear_ordered_comm_ring
section linear_ordered_comm_monoid_with_zero
variables [linear_ordered_comm_monoid_with_zero M] [no_zero_divisors M] {a : M} {n : ℕ}
lemma pow_pos_iff (hn : 0 < n) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ 0 < a := by simp_rw [zero_lt_iff, pow_ne_zero_iff hn]
end linear_ordered_comm_monoid_with_zero
section linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero
variables [linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero M] {a : M} {m n : ℕ}
lemma pow_lt_pow_succ (ha : 1 < a) : a ^ n < a ^ n.succ :=
by { rw [←one_mul (a ^ n), pow_succ],
exact mul_lt_right₀ _ ha (pow_ne_zero _ (zero_lt_one.trans ha).ne') }
lemma pow_lt_pow₀ (ha : 1 < a) (hmn : m < n) : a ^ m < a ^ n :=
by { induction hmn with n hmn ih, exacts [pow_lt_pow_succ ha, lt_trans ih (pow_lt_pow_succ ha)] }
end linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero
namespace monoid_hom
variables [ring R] [monoid M] [linear_order M] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)] (f : R →* M)
lemma map_neg_one : f (-1) = 1 :=
(pow_eq_one_iff (nat.succ_ne_zero 1)).1 $ by rw [←map_pow, neg_one_sq, map_one]
@[simp] lemma map_neg (x : R) : f (-x) = f x :=
by rw [←neg_one_mul, map_mul, map_neg_one, one_mul]
lemma map_sub_swap (x y : R) : f (x - y) = f (y - x) := by rw [←map_neg, neg_sub]
end monoid_hom
|
9cff08f1e2177d9f2b0e9046e3004d4affc253ea | 07c76fbd96ea1786cc6392fa834be62643cea420 | /hott/init/datatypes.hlean | f543894c9b17aeb5b73855c04b242be8df3c06b9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/lean2 | 5a430a153b570bf70dc8526d06f18fc000a60ad9 | 0889cf65b7b3cebfb8831b8731d89c2453dd1e9f | refs/heads/master | 1,592,036,508,364 | 1,545,093,958,000 | 1,545,093,958,000 | 75,436,854 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,480,718,780,000 | 1,480,718,780,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,809 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jakob von Raumer
Basic datatypes
-/
prelude
notation [parsing_only] `Type'` := Type.{_+1}
notation [parsing_only] `Type₊` := Type.{_+1}
notation `Type₀` := Type.{0}
notation `Type₁` := Type.{1}
notation `Type₂` := Type.{2}
notation `Type₃` := Type.{3}
inductive poly_unit.{l} : Type.{l} :=
star : poly_unit
inductive unit : Type₀ :=
star : unit
inductive empty : Type₀
inductive eq.{l} {A : Type.{l}} (a : A) : A → Type.{l} :=
refl : eq a a
structure lift.{l₁ l₂} (A : Type.{l₁}) : Type.{max l₁ l₂} :=
up :: (down : A)
inductive prod (A B : Type) :=
mk : A → B → prod A B
definition prod.pr1 [reducible] [unfold 3] {A B : Type} (p : prod A B) : A :=
prod.rec (λ a b, a) p
definition prod.pr2 [reducible] [unfold 3] {A B : Type} (p : prod A B) : B :=
prod.rec (λ a b, b) p
definition prod.destruct [reducible] := @prod.cases_on
inductive sum (A B : Type) : Type :=
| inl {} : A → sum A B
| inr {} : B → sum A B
definition sum.intro_left [reducible] {A : Type} (B : Type) (a : A) : sum A B :=
sum.inl a
definition sum.intro_right [reducible] (A : Type) {B : Type} (b : B) : sum A B :=
sum.inr b
inductive sigma {A : Type} (B : A → Type) :=
mk : Π (a : A), B a → sigma B
definition sigma.pr1 [reducible] [unfold 3] {A : Type} {B : A → Type} (p : sigma B) : A :=
sigma.rec (λ a b, a) p
definition sigma.pr2 [reducible] [unfold 3] {A : Type} {B : A → Type} (p : sigma B) : B (sigma.pr1 p) :=
sigma.rec (λ a b, b) p
-- pos_num and num are two auxiliary datatypes used when parsing numerals such as 13, 0, 26
-- in an [priority n] flag.
inductive pos_num : Type :=
| one : pos_num
| bit1 : pos_num → pos_num
| bit0 : pos_num → pos_num
namespace pos_num
definition succ (a : pos_num) : pos_num :=
pos_num.rec_on a (bit0 one) (λn r, bit0 r) (λn r, bit1 n)
end pos_num
inductive num : Type :=
| zero : num
| pos : pos_num → num
namespace num
open pos_num
definition succ (a : num) : num :=
num.rec_on a (pos one) (λp, pos (succ p))
end num
inductive bool : Type :=
| ff : bool
| tt : bool
inductive char : Type :=
mk : bool → bool → bool → bool → bool → bool → bool → bool → char
inductive string : Type :=
| empty : string
| str : char → string → string
inductive option (A : Type) : Type :=
| none {} : option A
| some : A → option A
-- Remark: we manually generate the nat.rec_on, nat.induction_on, nat.cases_on and nat.no_confusion.
-- We do that because we want 0 instead of nat.zero in these eliminators.
set_option inductive.rec_on false
set_option inductive.cases_on false
inductive nat :=
| zero : nat
| succ : nat → nat
|
590a2790b18a1e3b3eb9559981b9f1adbedb4a8d | 54f4ad05b219d444b709f56c2f619dd87d14ec29 | /my_project/src/love07_metaprogramming_exercise_sheet.lean | 593917593f10b9933de2fa7e759a7b1eed0688c3 | [] | no_license | yizhou7/learning-lean | 8efcf838c7276e235a81bd291f467fa43ce56e0a | 91fb366c624df6e56e19555b2e482ce767cd8224 | refs/heads/master | 1,675,649,087,737 | 1,609,022,281,000 | 1,609,022,281,000 | 272,072,779 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,100 | lean | import .love07_metaprogramming_demo
/-! # LoVe Exercise 7: Metaprogramming -/
set_option pp.beta true
namespace LoVe
/-! ## ## Question 1: A Term Exploder
In this exercise, we develop a string format for the `expr` metatype. By
default, there is no `has_repr` instance to print a nice string. For example: -/
#eval (expr.app (expr.var 0) (expr.var 1) : expr) -- result: `[external]`
#eval (`(λx : ℕ, x + x) : expr) -- result: `[external]`
/-! 1.1. Define a metafunction `expr.repr` that converts an `expr` into a
`string`. It is acceptable to leave out some fields from the `expr`
constructors, such as the level `l` of a sort, the binder information `bi` of
a `λ` or `∀` binder, and the arguments of the `macro` constructor.
Hint: Use `name.to_string` to convert a name to a string, and `repr` for other
types that belong to the `has_repr` type class. -/
-- enter your definition here
/-! We register `expr.repr` in the `has_repr` type class, so that we can use
`repr` without qualification in the future, and so that it is available to
`#eval`. We need the `meta` keyword in front of the command we enter. -/
meta instance expr.has_repr : has_repr expr :=
{ repr := expr.repr }
/-! 1.2. Test your setup. -/
#eval (expr.app (expr.var 0) (expr.var 1) : expr)
#eval (`(λx : ℕ, x + x) : expr)
/-! 1.3. Compare your answer with `expr.to_raw_fmt`. -/
#check expr.to_raw_fmt
/-! ## Question 2: `destruct_and` on Steroids
Recall from the lecture that `destruct_and` fails on easy goals such as -/
#check abc_ac
/-! We will now address this by developing a new tactic called `destro_and`,
which applies both **des**truction and in**tro**duction rules for conjunction.
It will also go automatically through the hypotheses instead of taking an
argument. We will develop it in three steps.
2.1. Develop a tactic `intro_ands` that replaces all goals of the form
`a ∧ b` with two new goals `a` and `b` systematically, until all top-level
conjunctions are gone.
For this, we can use tactics such as `tactic.repeat` (which repeatedly applies a
tactic on all goals and subgoals until the tactic fails on each of the goal) and
`tactic.applyc` (which can be used to apply a rule, in connection with backtick
quoting). -/
meta def intro_ands : tactic unit :=
sorry
lemma abcd_bd (a b c d : Prop) (h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d) :
b ∧ d :=
begin
intro_ands,
/- The proof state should be as follows:
2 goals
a b c d : Prop,
h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d
⊢ b
a b c d : Prop,
h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d
⊢ d -/
repeat { sorry }
end
lemma abcd_bacb (a b c d : Prop) (h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d) :
b ∧ (a ∧ (c ∧ b)) :=
begin
intro_ands,
/- The proof state should be as follows:
4 goals
a b c d : Prop,
h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d
⊢ b
a b c d : Prop,
h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d
⊢ a
a b c d : Prop,
h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d
⊢ c
a b c d : Prop,
h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d
⊢ b -/
repeat { sorry }
end
/-! 2.2. Develop a tactic `destruct_ands` that replaces hypotheses of the form
`h : a ∧ b` by two new hypotheses `h_left : a` and `h_right : b` systematically,
until all top-level conjunctions are gone.
Here is imperative-style pseudocode that you can follow:
1. Retrieve the list of hypotheses from the context. This is provided by the
metaconstant `local_context`.
2. Find the first hypothesis (= term) with a type (= proposition) of the form
`_ ∧ _`. Here, you can use the `list.mfirst` function, in conjunction with
pattern matching. You can use `infer_type` to query the type of a term.
3. Perform a case split on the first found hypothesis. This can be achieved
using the `cases` metafunction.
4. Repeat.
The above procedure might fail if there exists no hypotheses of the required
form. Make sure to handle this failure gracefully, for example using
`tactic.try` or `<|> pure ()`. -/
meta def destruct_ands : tactic unit :=
sorry
lemma abcd_bd₂ (a b c d : Prop) (h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d) :
b ∧ d :=
begin
destruct_ands,
/- The proof state should be as follows:
a b c d : Prop,
h_left : a,
h_right_right : d,
h_right_left_left : b,
h_right_left_right : c
⊢ b ∧ d -/
sorry
end
/-! 2.3. Combine the two tactics developed above and `tactic.assumption` to
implement the desired `destro_and` tactic. -/
meta def destro_and : tactic unit :=
sorry
lemma abcd_bd₃ (a b c d : Prop) (h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d) :
b ∧ d :=
by destro_and
lemma abcd_bacb₂ (a b c d : Prop) (h : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ∧ d) :
b ∧ (a ∧ (c ∧ b)) :=
by destro_and
lemma abd_bacb (a b c d : Prop) (h : a ∧ b ∧ d) :
b ∧ (a ∧ (c ∧ b)) :=
begin
destro_and,
/- The proof state should be roughly as follows:
a b c d : Prop,
h_left : a,
h_right_left : b,
h_right_right : d
⊢ c -/
sorry -- unprovable
end
/-! 2.4. Provide some more examples for `destro_and` to convince yourself that
it works as expected also on more complicated examples. -/
-- enter your examples here
/-! ## Question 3 (**optional**): A Theorem Finder
We will implement a function that allows us to find theorems by constants
appearing in their statements. So given a list of constant names, the function
will list all theorems in which all these constants appear.
You can use the following metaconstants:
* `declaration` contains all data (name, type, value) associated with a
declaration understood broadly (e.g., axiom, lemma, constant, etc.).
* `tactic.get_env` gives us access to the `environment`, a metatype thats lists
all `declaration`s (including all theorems).
* `environment.fold` allows us to walk through the environment and collect data.
* `expr.fold` allows us to walk through an expression and collect data.
3.1 (**optional**). Write a metafunction that checks whether an expression
contains a specific constant.
You can use `expr.fold` to walk through the expression, `||` and `ff` for
Booleans, and `expr.is_constant_of` to check whether an expression is a
constant. -/
meta def term_contains (e : expr) (nam : name) : bool :=
sorry
/-! 3.2 (**optional**). Write a metafunction that checks whether an expression
contains **all** constants in a list.
You can use `list.band` (Boolean and). -/
meta def term_contains_all (nams : list name) (e : expr) : bool :=
sorry
/-! 3.3 (**optional**). Produce the list of all theorems that contain all
constants `nams` in their statement.
`environment.fold` allows you to walk over the list of declarations. With
`declaration.type`, you get the type of a theorem, and with
`declaration.to_name` you get the name. -/
meta def list_constants (nams : list name) (e : environment) : list name :=
sorry
/-! Finally, we develop a tactic that uses the above metafunctions to log all
found theorems: -/
meta def find_constants (nams : list name) : tactic unit :=
do
env ← tactic.get_env,
list.mmap' tactic.trace (list_constants nams env)
/-! We test the solution. -/
run_cmd find_constants [] -- lists all theorems
run_cmd find_constants [`list.map, `function.comp]
end LoVe
|
75ee5e9e5d49cb8e5675b2337d4d7511b83b4594 | eeee7bfb5e0033ce2c5099a3cf5c87a3c71b1f62 | /src/perfectoid_space.lean | d1eb770c4ee68a4a0c66dae3c04ecb5f486f4787 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jesse-michael-han/lean-perfectoid-spaces | f0c652bc1a0de64de90bb8c98f26d9579b226a9c | 45b42a5302dca28910ae9c6e3847c025e5ba4180 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,646,248,214 | 1,528,569,065,000 | 1,528,569,065,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 686 | lean | -- definitions of adic_space, preadic_space, Huber_pair etc
import adic_space
--notation
postfix `ᵒ` : 66 := power_bounded_subring
open nat.Prime
variable [nat.Prime] -- fix a prime p
/-- A perfectoid ring, following Fontaine Sem Bourb-/
class perfectoid_ring (R : Type) extends Tate_ring R :=
(complete : is_complete R)
(uniform : is_uniform R)
(ramified : ∃ ϖ : Rᵒ, (is_pseudo_uniformizer ϖ) ∧ (ϖ^p ∣ p))
(Frob : ∀ a : Rᵒ, ∃ b : Rᵒ, (p : Rᵒ) ∣ (b^p - a))
class perfectoid_space (X : Type) extends adic_space X :=
(perfectoid_cover : ∀ x : X, ∃ (U : opens X) (A : Huber_pair) [perfectoid_ring A],
(x ∈ U) ∧ is_preadic_space_equiv U (Spa A))
|
28e1d03d8bbde8bd6e6cce4a79a9c74bc158975d | 969dbdfed67fda40a6f5a2b4f8c4a3c7dc01e0fb | /src/ring_theory/algebraic.lean | b87fa3b7bc4680691306f83480d0281bde10612c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SAAluthwela/mathlib | 62044349d72dd63983a8500214736aa7779634d3 | 83a4b8b990907291421de54a78988c024dc8a552 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,433,873,417 | 1,615,998,031,000 | 1,615,998,031,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,057 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import ring_theory.integral_closure
import data.polynomial.integral_normalization
/-!
# Algebraic elements and algebraic extensions
An element of an R-algebra is algebraic over R if it is the root of a nonzero polynomial.
An R-algebra is algebraic over R if and only if all its elements are algebraic over R.
The main result in this file proves transitivity of algebraicity:
a tower of algebraic field extensions is algebraic.
-/
universe variables u v
open_locale classical
open polynomial
section
variables (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [ring A] [algebra R A]
/-- An element of an R-algebra is algebraic over R if it is the root of a nonzero polynomial. -/
def is_algebraic (x : A) : Prop :=
∃ p : polynomial R, p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval x p = 0
/-- An element of an R-algebra is transcendental over R if it is not algebraic over R. -/
def transcendental (x : A) : Prop := ¬ is_algebraic R x
variables {R}
/-- A subalgebra is algebraic if all its elements are algebraic. -/
def subalgebra.is_algebraic (S : subalgebra R A) : Prop := ∀ x ∈ S, is_algebraic R x
variables (R A)
/-- An algebra is algebraic if all its elements are algebraic. -/
def algebra.is_algebraic : Prop := ∀ x : A, is_algebraic R x
variables {R A}
/-- A subalgebra is algebraic if and only if it is algebraic an algebra. -/
lemma subalgebra.is_algebraic_iff (S : subalgebra R A) :
S.is_algebraic ↔ @algebra.is_algebraic R S _ _ (S.algebra) :=
begin
delta algebra.is_algebraic subalgebra.is_algebraic,
rw [subtype.forall'],
apply forall_congr, rintro ⟨x, hx⟩,
apply exists_congr, intro p,
apply and_congr iff.rfl,
have h : function.injective (S.val) := subtype.val_injective,
conv_rhs { rw [← h.eq_iff, alg_hom.map_zero], },
rw [← aeval_alg_hom_apply, S.val_apply]
end
/-- An algebra is algebraic if and only if it is algebraic as a subalgebra. -/
lemma algebra.is_algebraic_iff : algebra.is_algebraic R A ↔ (⊤ : subalgebra R A).is_algebraic :=
begin
delta algebra.is_algebraic subalgebra.is_algebraic,
simp only [algebra.mem_top, forall_prop_of_true, iff_self],
end
end
section zero_ne_one
variables (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [comm_ring R] [nontrivial R] [ring A] [algebra R A]
/-- An integral element of an algebra is algebraic.-/
lemma is_integral.is_algebraic {x : A} (h : is_integral R x) : is_algebraic R x :=
by { rcases h with ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩, exact ⟨p, hp.ne_zero, hpx⟩ }
variables {R}
/-- An element of `R` is algebraic, when viewed as an element of the `R`-algebra `A`. -/
lemma is_algebraic_algebra_map (a : R) : is_algebraic R (algebra_map R A a) :=
⟨X - C a, X_sub_C_ne_zero a, by simp only [aeval_C, aeval_X, alg_hom.map_sub, sub_self]⟩
end zero_ne_one
section field
variables (K : Type u) {A : Type v} [field K] [ring A] [algebra K A]
/-- An element of an algebra over a field is algebraic if and only if it is integral.-/
lemma is_algebraic_iff_is_integral {x : A} :
is_algebraic K x ↔ is_integral K x :=
begin
refine ⟨_, is_integral.is_algebraic K⟩,
rintro ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩,
refine ⟨_, monic_mul_leading_coeff_inv hp, _⟩,
rw [← aeval_def, alg_hom.map_mul, hpx, zero_mul],
end
lemma is_algebraic_iff_is_integral' :
algebra.is_algebraic K A ↔ algebra.is_integral K A :=
⟨λ h x, (is_algebraic_iff_is_integral K).mp (h x),
λ h x, (is_algebraic_iff_is_integral K).mpr (h x)⟩
end field
namespace algebra
variables {K : Type*} {L : Type*} {A : Type*}
variables [field K] [field L] [comm_ring A]
variables [algebra K L] [algebra L A] [algebra K A] [is_scalar_tower K L A]
/-- If L is an algebraic field extension of K and A is an algebraic algebra over L,
then A is algebraic over K. -/
lemma is_algebraic_trans (L_alg : is_algebraic K L) (A_alg : is_algebraic L A) :
is_algebraic K A :=
begin
simp only [is_algebraic, is_algebraic_iff_is_integral] at L_alg A_alg ⊢,
exact is_integral_trans L_alg A_alg,
end
/-- A field extension is algebraic if it is finite. -/
lemma is_algebraic_of_finite [finite : finite_dimensional K L] : is_algebraic K L :=
λ x, (is_algebraic_iff_is_integral _).mpr (is_integral_of_submodule_noetherian ⊤
(is_noetherian_of_submodule_of_noetherian _ _ _ finite) x algebra.mem_top)
end algebra
variables {R S : Type*} [integral_domain R] [comm_ring S]
lemma exists_integral_multiple [algebra R S] {z : S} (hz : is_algebraic R z)
(inj : ∀ x, algebra_map R S x = 0 → x = 0) :
∃ (x : integral_closure R S) (y ≠ (0 : integral_closure R S)),
z * y = x :=
begin
rcases hz with ⟨p, p_ne_zero, px⟩,
set a := p.leading_coeff with a_def,
have a_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 := mt polynomial.leading_coeff_eq_zero.mp p_ne_zero,
have y_integral : is_integral R (algebra_map R S a) := is_integral_algebra_map,
have x_integral : is_integral R (z * algebra_map R S a) :=
⟨ p.integral_normalization,
monic_integral_normalization p_ne_zero,
integral_normalization_aeval_eq_zero px inj ⟩,
refine ⟨⟨_, x_integral⟩, ⟨_, y_integral⟩, _, rfl⟩,
exact λ h, a_ne_zero (inj _ (subtype.ext_iff_val.mp h))
end
section field
variables {K L : Type*} [field K] [field L] [algebra K L] (A : subalgebra K L)
lemma inv_eq_of_aeval_div_X_ne_zero {x : L} {p : polynomial K}
(aeval_ne : aeval x (div_X p) ≠ 0) :
x⁻¹ = aeval x (div_X p) / (aeval x p - algebra_map _ _ (p.coeff 0)) :=
begin
rw [inv_eq_iff, inv_div, div_eq_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_comm],
conv_lhs { rw ← div_X_mul_X_add p },
rw [alg_hom.map_add, alg_hom.map_mul, aeval_X, aeval_C],
exact aeval_ne
end
lemma inv_eq_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero {x : L} {p : polynomial K}
(aeval_eq : aeval x p = 0) (coeff_zero_ne : p.coeff 0 ≠ 0) :
x⁻¹ = - (aeval x (div_X p) / algebra_map _ _ (p.coeff 0)) :=
begin
convert inv_eq_of_aeval_div_X_ne_zero (mt (λ h, (algebra_map K L).injective _) coeff_zero_ne),
{ rw [aeval_eq, zero_sub, div_neg] },
rw ring_hom.map_zero,
convert aeval_eq,
conv_rhs { rw ← div_X_mul_X_add p },
rw [alg_hom.map_add, alg_hom.map_mul, h, zero_mul, zero_add, aeval_C]
end
lemma subalgebra.inv_mem_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero {x : A} {p : polynomial K}
(aeval_eq : aeval x p = 0) (coeff_zero_ne : p.coeff 0 ≠ 0) : (x⁻¹ : L) ∈ A :=
begin
have : (x⁻¹ : L) = aeval x (div_X p) / (aeval x p - algebra_map _ _ (p.coeff 0)),
{ rw [aeval_eq, submodule.coe_zero, zero_sub, div_neg],
convert inv_eq_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero _ coeff_zero_ne,
{ rw subalgebra.aeval_coe },
{ simpa using aeval_eq } },
rw [this, div_eq_mul_inv, aeval_eq, submodule.coe_zero, zero_sub, ← ring_hom.map_neg,
← ring_hom.map_inv],
exact A.mul_mem (aeval x p.div_X).2 (A.algebra_map_mem _),
end
lemma subalgebra.inv_mem_of_algebraic {x : A} (hx : is_algebraic K (x : L)) : (x⁻¹ : L) ∈ A :=
begin
obtain ⟨p, ne_zero, aeval_eq⟩ := hx,
replace aeval_eq : aeval x p = 0,
{ rw ← submodule.coe_eq_zero,
convert aeval_eq,
exact is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_aeval K A L _ _ },
revert ne_zero aeval_eq,
refine p.rec_on_horner _ _ _,
{ intro h,
contradiction },
{ intros p a hp ha ih ne_zero aeval_eq,
refine A.inv_mem_of_root_of_coeff_zero_ne_zero aeval_eq _,
rwa [coeff_add, hp, zero_add, coeff_C, if_pos rfl] },
{ intros p hp ih ne_zero aeval_eq,
rw [alg_hom.map_mul, aeval_X, mul_eq_zero] at aeval_eq,
cases aeval_eq with aeval_eq x_eq,
{ exact ih hp aeval_eq },
{ rw [x_eq, submodule.coe_zero, inv_zero],
exact A.zero_mem } }
end
/-- In an algebraic extension L/K, an intermediate subalgebra is a field. -/
lemma subalgebra.is_field_of_algebraic (hKL : algebra.is_algebraic K L) : is_field A :=
{ mul_inv_cancel := λ a ha, ⟨
⟨a⁻¹, A.inv_mem_of_algebraic (hKL a)⟩,
subtype.ext (mul_inv_cancel (mt submodule.coe_eq_zero.mp ha))⟩,
.. subalgebra.integral_domain A }
end field
|
ec017c2055af7336c0e56119febe054add54f192 | 3863d2564418bccb1859e057bf5a4ef240e75fd7 | /library/data/nat/order.lean | 5b6842cbaa86b6db80ad6a6d6363dcfd1856231d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JacobGross/lean | 118bbb067ff4d4af48a266face2c7eb9868fa91c | eb26087df940c54337cb807b4bc6d345d1fc1085 | refs/heads/master | 1,582,735,011,532 | 1,462,557,826,000 | 1,462,557,826,000 | 46,451,196 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,462,557,826,000 | 1,447,885,161,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,445 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
The order relation on the natural numbers.
-/
import .basic algebra.ordered_ring
open eq.ops
namespace nat
/- lt and le -/
protected theorem le_of_lt_or_eq {m n : ℕ} (H : m < n ∨ m = n) : m ≤ n :=
nat.le_of_eq_or_lt (or.swap H)
protected theorem lt_or_eq_of_le {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : m < n ∨ m = n :=
or.swap (nat.eq_or_lt_of_le H)
protected theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq (m n : ℕ) : m ≤ n ↔ m < n ∨ m = n :=
iff.intro nat.lt_or_eq_of_le nat.le_of_lt_or_eq
protected theorem lt_of_le_and_ne {m n : ℕ} (H1 : m ≤ n) : m ≠ n → m < n :=
or_resolve_right (nat.eq_or_lt_of_le H1)
protected theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne (m n : ℕ) : m < n ↔ m ≤ n ∧ m ≠ n :=
iff.intro
(take H, and.intro (nat.le_of_lt H) (take H1, !nat.lt_irrefl (H1 ▸ H)))
(and.rec nat.lt_of_le_and_ne)
theorem le_add_right (n k : ℕ) : n ≤ n + k :=
nat.rec !nat.le_refl (λ k, le_succ_of_le) k
theorem le_add_left (n m : ℕ): n ≤ m + n :=
!add.comm ▸ !le_add_right
theorem le.intro {n m k : ℕ} (h : n + k = m) : n ≤ m :=
h ▸ !le_add_right
theorem le.elim {n m : ℕ} : n ≤ m → ∃ k, n + k = m :=
le.rec (exists.intro 0 rfl) (λm h, Exists.rec
(λ k H, exists.intro (succ k) (H ▸ rfl)))
protected theorem le_total {m n : ℕ} : m ≤ n ∨ n ≤ m :=
or.imp_left nat.le_of_lt !nat.lt_or_ge
/- addition -/
protected theorem add_le_add_left {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (k : ℕ) : k + n ≤ k + m :=
obtain l Hl, from le.elim H, le.intro (Hl ▸ !add.assoc)
protected theorem add_le_add_right {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (k : ℕ) : n + k ≤ m + k :=
!add.comm ▸ !add.comm ▸ nat.add_le_add_left H k
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_left {k n m : ℕ} (H : k + n ≤ k + m) : n ≤ m :=
obtain l Hl, from le.elim H, le.intro (nat.add_left_cancel (!add.assoc⁻¹ ⬝ Hl))
protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_left {k n m : ℕ} (H : k + n < k + m) : n < m :=
let H' := nat.le_of_lt H in
nat.lt_of_le_and_ne (nat.le_of_add_le_add_left H') (assume Heq, !nat.lt_irrefl (Heq ▸ H))
protected theorem add_lt_add_left {n m : ℕ} (H : n < m) (k : ℕ) : k + n < k + m :=
lt_of_succ_le (!add_succ ▸ nat.add_le_add_left (succ_le_of_lt H) k)
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {n m : ℕ} (H : n < m) (k : ℕ) : n + k < m + k :=
!add.comm ▸ !add.comm ▸ nat.add_lt_add_left H k
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right {n k : ℕ} (H : k > 0) : n < n + k :=
!add_zero ▸ nat.add_lt_add_left H n
/- multiplication -/
theorem mul_le_mul_left {n m : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (H : n ≤ m) : k * n ≤ k * m :=
obtain (l : ℕ) (Hl : n + l = m), from le.elim H,
have k * n + k * l = k * m, by rewrite [-left_distrib, Hl],
le.intro this
theorem mul_le_mul_right {n m : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (H : n ≤ m) : n * k ≤ m * k :=
!mul.comm ▸ !mul.comm ▸ !mul_le_mul_left H
protected theorem mul_le_mul {n m k l : ℕ} (H1 : n ≤ k) (H2 : m ≤ l) : n * m ≤ k * l :=
nat.le_trans (!nat.mul_le_mul_right H1) (!nat.mul_le_mul_left H2)
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {n m k : ℕ} (H : n < m) (Hk : k > 0) : k * n < k * m :=
nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (nat.lt_add_of_pos_right Hk) (!mul_succ ▸ nat.mul_le_mul_left k (succ_le_of_lt H))
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right {n m k : ℕ} (H : n < m) (Hk : k > 0) : n * k < m * k :=
!mul.comm ▸ !mul.comm ▸ nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left H Hk
/- nat is an instance of a linearly ordered semiring and a lattice -/
protected definition decidable_linear_ordered_semiring [trans_instance] :
decidable_linear_ordered_semiring nat :=
⦃ decidable_linear_ordered_semiring, nat.comm_semiring,
add_left_cancel := @nat.add_left_cancel,
add_right_cancel := @nat.add_right_cancel,
lt := nat.lt,
le := nat.le,
le_refl := nat.le_refl,
le_trans := @nat.le_trans,
le_antisymm := @nat.le_antisymm,
le_total := @nat.le_total,
le_iff_lt_or_eq := @nat.le_iff_lt_or_eq,
le_of_lt := @nat.le_of_lt,
lt_irrefl := @nat.lt_irrefl,
lt_of_lt_of_le := @nat.lt_of_lt_of_le,
lt_of_le_of_lt := @nat.lt_of_le_of_lt,
lt_of_add_lt_add_left := @nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_left,
add_lt_add_left := @nat.add_lt_add_left,
add_le_add_left := @nat.add_le_add_left,
le_of_add_le_add_left := @nat.le_of_add_le_add_left,
zero_lt_one := zero_lt_succ 0,
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left := (take a b c H1 H2, nat.mul_le_mul_left c H1),
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right := (take a b c H1 H2, nat.mul_le_mul_right c H1),
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := @nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left,
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := @nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right,
decidable_lt := nat.decidable_lt ⦄
definition nat_has_dvd [instance] [priority nat.prio] : has_dvd nat :=
has_dvd.mk has_dvd.dvd
theorem add_pos_left {a : ℕ} (H : 0 < a) (b : ℕ) : 0 < a + b :=
@add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg _ _ a b H !zero_le
theorem add_pos_right {a : ℕ} (H : 0 < a) (b : ℕ) : 0 < b + a :=
by rewrite add.comm; apply add_pos_left H b
theorem add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_and_eq_zero {a b : ℕ} :
a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
@add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_and_eq_zero_of_nonneg_of_nonneg _ _ a b !zero_le !zero_le
theorem le_add_of_le_left {a b c : ℕ} (H : b ≤ c) : b ≤ a + c :=
@le_add_of_nonneg_of_le _ _ a b c !zero_le H
theorem le_add_of_le_right {a b c : ℕ} (H : b ≤ c) : b ≤ c + a :=
@le_add_of_le_of_nonneg _ _ a b c H !zero_le
theorem lt_add_of_lt_left {b c : ℕ} (H : b < c) (a : ℕ) : b < a + c :=
@lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt _ _ a b c !zero_le H
theorem lt_add_of_lt_right {b c : ℕ} (H : b < c) (a : ℕ) : b < c + a :=
@lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg _ _ a b c H !zero_le
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left {a b c : ℕ} (H : c * a < c * b) : a < b :=
@lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left _ _ a b c H !zero_le
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right {a b c : ℕ} (H : a * c < b * c) : a < b :=
@lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right _ _ a b c H !zero_le
theorem pos_of_mul_pos_left {a b : ℕ} (H : 0 < a * b) : 0 < b :=
@pos_of_mul_pos_left _ _ a b H !zero_le
theorem pos_of_mul_pos_right {a b : ℕ} (H : 0 < a * b) : 0 < a :=
@pos_of_mul_pos_right _ _ a b H !zero_le
theorem zero_le_one : (0:nat) ≤ 1 :=
dec_trivial
/- properties specific to nat -/
theorem lt_intro {n m k : ℕ} (H : succ n + k = m) : n < m :=
lt_of_succ_le (le.intro H)
theorem lt_elim {n m : ℕ} (H : n < m) : ∃k, succ n + k = m :=
le.elim (succ_le_of_lt H)
theorem lt_add_succ (n m : ℕ) : n < n + succ m :=
lt_intro !succ_add_eq_succ_add
theorem eq_zero_of_le_zero {n : ℕ} (H : n ≤ 0) : n = 0 :=
obtain (k : ℕ) (Hk : n + k = 0), from le.elim H,
eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right Hk
/- succ and pred -/
theorem le_of_lt_succ {m n : nat} : m < succ n → m ≤ n :=
le_of_succ_le_succ
theorem lt_iff_succ_le (m n : nat) : m < n ↔ succ m ≤ n :=
iff.rfl
theorem lt_succ_iff_le (m n : nat) : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
iff.intro le_of_lt_succ lt_succ_of_le
theorem self_le_succ (n : ℕ) : n ≤ succ n :=
le.intro !add_one
theorem succ_le_or_eq_of_le {n m : ℕ} : n ≤ m → succ n ≤ m ∨ n = m :=
lt_or_eq_of_le
theorem pred_le_of_le_succ {n m : ℕ} : n ≤ succ m → pred n ≤ m :=
pred_le_pred
theorem succ_le_of_le_pred {n m : ℕ} : succ n ≤ m → n ≤ pred m :=
pred_le_pred
theorem pred_le_pred_of_le {n m : ℕ} : n ≤ m → pred n ≤ pred m :=
pred_le_pred
theorem pre_lt_of_lt {n m : ℕ} : n < m → pred n < m :=
lt_of_le_of_lt !pred_le
theorem lt_of_pred_lt_pred {n m : ℕ} (H : pred n < pred m) : n < m :=
lt_of_not_ge
(suppose m ≤ n,
not_lt_of_ge (pred_le_pred_of_le this) H)
theorem le_or_eq_succ_of_le_succ {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ succ m) : n ≤ m ∨ n = succ m :=
or.imp_left le_of_succ_le_succ (succ_le_or_eq_of_le H)
theorem le_pred_self (n : ℕ) : pred n ≤ n :=
!pred_le
theorem succ_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < succ n :=
!zero_lt_succ
theorem succ_pred_of_pos {n : ℕ} (H : n > 0) : succ (pred n) = n :=
(or_resolve_right (eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred n) (ne.symm (ne_of_lt H)))⁻¹
theorem exists_eq_succ_of_lt {n : ℕ} : Π {m : ℕ}, n < m → ∃k, m = succ k
| 0 H := absurd H !not_lt_zero
| (succ k) H := exists.intro k rfl
theorem lt_succ_self (n : ℕ) : n < succ n :=
lt.base n
lemma lt_succ_of_lt {i j : nat} : i < j → i < succ j :=
assume Plt, lt.trans Plt (self_lt_succ j)
/- increasing and decreasing functions -/
section
variables {A : Type} [strict_order A] {f : ℕ → A}
theorem strictly_increasing_of_forall_lt_succ (H : ∀ i, f i < f (succ i)) : strictly_increasing f :=
take i j,
nat.induction_on j
(suppose i < 0, absurd this !not_lt_zero)
(take j', assume ih, suppose i < succ j',
or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ this))
(suppose i < j', lt.trans (ih this) (H j'))
(suppose i = j', by rewrite this; apply H))
theorem strictly_decreasing_of_forall_gt_succ (H : ∀ i, f i > f (succ i)) : strictly_decreasing f :=
take i j,
nat.induction_on j
(suppose i < 0, absurd this !not_lt_zero)
(take j', assume ih, suppose i < succ j',
or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ this))
(suppose i < j', lt.trans (H j') (ih this))
(suppose i = j', by rewrite this; apply H))
end
section
variables {A : Type} [weak_order A] {f : ℕ → A}
theorem nondecreasing_of_forall_le_succ (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ f (succ i)) : nondecreasing f :=
take i j,
nat.induction_on j
(suppose i ≤ 0, have i = 0, from eq_zero_of_le_zero this, by rewrite this; apply le.refl)
(take j', assume ih, suppose i ≤ succ j',
or.elim (le_or_eq_succ_of_le_succ this)
(suppose i ≤ j', le.trans (ih this) (H j'))
(suppose i = succ j', by rewrite this; apply le.refl))
theorem nonincreasing_of_forall_ge_succ (H : ∀ i, f i ≥ f (succ i)) : nonincreasing f :=
take i j,
nat.induction_on j
(suppose i ≤ 0, have i = 0, from eq_zero_of_le_zero this, by rewrite this; apply le.refl)
(take j', assume ih, suppose i ≤ succ j',
or.elim (le_or_eq_succ_of_le_succ this)
(suppose i ≤ j', le.trans (H j') (ih this))
(suppose i = succ j', by rewrite this; apply le.refl))
end
/- other forms of induction -/
protected definition strong_rec_on {P : nat → Type} (n : ℕ) (H : ∀n, (∀m, m < n → P m) → P n) : P n :=
nat.rec (λm h, absurd h !not_lt_zero)
(λn' (IH : ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n' → P m) m l,
or.by_cases (lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ l))
IH (λ e, eq.rec (H n' @IH) e⁻¹)) (succ n) n !lt_succ_self
protected theorem strong_induction_on {P : nat → Prop} (n : ℕ) (H : ∀n, (∀m, m < n → P m) → P n) :
P n :=
nat.strong_rec_on n H
protected theorem case_strong_induction_on {P : nat → Prop} (a : nat) (H0 : P 0)
(Hind : ∀(n : nat), (∀m, m ≤ n → P m) → P (succ n)) : P a :=
nat.strong_induction_on a
(take n,
show (∀ m, m < n → P m) → P n, from
nat.cases_on n
(suppose (∀ m, m < 0 → P m), show P 0, from H0)
(take n,
suppose (∀ m, m < succ n → P m),
show P (succ n), from
Hind n (take m, assume H1 : m ≤ n, this _ (lt_succ_of_le H1))))
/- pos -/
theorem by_cases_zero_pos {P : ℕ → Prop} (y : ℕ) (H0 : P 0) (H1 : ∀ {y : nat}, y > 0 → P y) :
P y :=
nat.cases_on y H0 (take y, H1 !succ_pos)
theorem eq_zero_or_pos (n : ℕ) : n = 0 ∨ n > 0 :=
or_of_or_of_imp_left
(or.swap (lt_or_eq_of_le !zero_le))
(suppose 0 = n, by subst n)
theorem pos_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (H : n ≠ 0) : n > 0 :=
or.elim !eq_zero_or_pos (take H2 : n = 0, by contradiction) (take H2 : n > 0, H2)
theorem ne_zero_of_pos {n : ℕ} (H : n > 0) : n ≠ 0 :=
ne.symm (ne_of_lt H)
theorem exists_eq_succ_of_pos {n : ℕ} (H : n > 0) : ∃l, n = succ l :=
exists_eq_succ_of_lt H
theorem pos_of_dvd_of_pos {m n : ℕ} (H1 : m ∣ n) (H2 : n > 0) : m > 0 :=
pos_of_ne_zero
(suppose m = 0,
have n = 0, from eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (this ▸ H1),
ne_of_lt H2 (by subst n))
/- multiplication -/
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt {n m k l : ℕ} (Hk : k > 0) (H1 : n ≤ k) (H2 : m < l) :
n * m < k * l :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul_right m H1) (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left H2 Hk)
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le {n m k l : ℕ} (Hl : l > 0) (H1 : n < k) (H2 : m ≤ l) :
n * m < k * l :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul_left n H2) (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right H1 Hl)
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_le {n m k l : ℕ} (H1 : n < k) (H2 : m < l) : n * m < k * l :=
have H3 : n * m ≤ k * m, from mul_le_mul_right m (le_of_lt H1),
have H4 : k * m < k * l, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left H2 (lt_of_le_of_lt !zero_le H1),
lt_of_le_of_lt H3 H4
theorem eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left {m k n : ℕ} (Hn : n > 0) (H : n * m = n * k) : m = k :=
have n * m ≤ n * k, by rewrite H,
have m ≤ k, from le_of_mul_le_mul_left this Hn,
have n * k ≤ n * m, by rewrite H,
have k ≤ m, from le_of_mul_le_mul_left this Hn,
le.antisymm `m ≤ k` this
theorem eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right {n m k : ℕ} (Hm : m > 0) (H : n * m = k * m) : n = k :=
eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left Hm (!mul.comm ▸ !mul.comm ▸ H)
theorem eq_zero_or_eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left {n m k : ℕ} (H : n * m = n * k) : n = 0 ∨ m = k :=
or_of_or_of_imp_right !eq_zero_or_pos
(assume Hn : n > 0, eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left Hn H)
theorem eq_zero_or_eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right {n m k : ℕ} (H : n * m = k * m) : m = 0 ∨ n = k :=
eq_zero_or_eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (!mul.comm ▸ !mul.comm ▸ H)
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right {n m : ℕ} (H : n * m = 1) : n = 1 :=
have H2 : n * m > 0, by rewrite H; apply succ_pos,
or.elim (le_or_gt n 1)
(suppose n ≤ 1,
have n > 0, from pos_of_mul_pos_right H2,
show n = 1, from le.antisymm `n ≤ 1` (succ_le_of_lt this))
(suppose n > 1,
have m > 0, from pos_of_mul_pos_left H2,
have n * m ≥ 2 * 1, from nat.mul_le_mul (succ_le_of_lt `n > 1`) (succ_le_of_lt this),
have 1 ≥ 2, from !mul_one ▸ H ▸ this,
absurd !lt_succ_self (not_lt_of_ge this))
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_left {n m : ℕ} (H : n * m = 1) : m = 1 :=
eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right (!mul.comm ▸ H)
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_self_left {n m : ℕ} (Hpos : n > 0) (H : m * n = n) : m = 1 :=
eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right Hpos (H ⬝ !one_mul⁻¹)
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_self_right {n m : ℕ} (Hpos : m > 0) (H : m * n = m) : n = 1 :=
eq_one_of_mul_eq_self_left Hpos (!mul.comm ▸ H)
theorem eq_one_of_dvd_one {n : ℕ} (H : n ∣ 1) : n = 1 :=
dvd.elim H
(take m, suppose 1 = n * m,
eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right this⁻¹)
/- min and max -/
open decidable
theorem min_zero [simp] (a : ℕ) : min a 0 = 0 :=
by rewrite [min_eq_right !zero_le]
theorem zero_min [simp] (a : ℕ) : min 0 a = 0 :=
by rewrite [min_eq_left !zero_le]
theorem max_zero [simp] (a : ℕ) : max a 0 = a :=
by rewrite [max_eq_left !zero_le]
theorem zero_max [simp] (a : ℕ) : max 0 a = a :=
by rewrite [max_eq_right !zero_le]
theorem min_succ_succ [simp] (a b : ℕ) : min (succ a) (succ b) = succ (min a b) :=
or.elim !lt_or_ge
(suppose a < b, by rewrite [min_eq_left_of_lt this, min_eq_left_of_lt (succ_lt_succ this)])
(suppose a ≥ b, by rewrite [min_eq_right this, min_eq_right (succ_le_succ this)])
theorem max_succ_succ [simp] (a b : ℕ) : max (succ a) (succ b) = succ (max a b) :=
or.elim !lt_or_ge
(suppose a < b, by rewrite [max_eq_right_of_lt this, max_eq_right_of_lt (succ_lt_succ this)])
(suppose a ≥ b, by rewrite [max_eq_left this, max_eq_left (succ_le_succ this)])
/- In algebra.ordered_group, these next four are only proved for additive groups, not additive
semigroups. -/
protected theorem min_add_add_left (a b c : ℕ) : min (a + b) (a + c) = a + min b c :=
decidable.by_cases
(suppose b ≤ c,
have a + b ≤ a + c, from add_le_add_left this _,
by rewrite [min_eq_left `b ≤ c`, min_eq_left this])
(suppose ¬ b ≤ c,
have c ≤ b, from le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge this),
have a + c ≤ a + b, from add_le_add_left this _,
by rewrite [min_eq_right `c ≤ b`, min_eq_right this])
protected theorem min_add_add_right (a b c : ℕ) : min (a + c) (b + c) = min a b + c :=
by rewrite [add.comm a c, add.comm b c, add.comm _ c]; apply nat.min_add_add_left
protected theorem max_add_add_left (a b c : ℕ) : max (a + b) (a + c) = a + max b c :=
decidable.by_cases
(suppose b ≤ c,
have a + b ≤ a + c, from add_le_add_left this _,
by rewrite [max_eq_right `b ≤ c`, max_eq_right this])
(suppose ¬ b ≤ c,
have c ≤ b, from le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge this),
have a + c ≤ a + b, from add_le_add_left this _,
by rewrite [max_eq_left `c ≤ b`, max_eq_left this])
protected theorem max_add_add_right (a b c : ℕ) : max (a + c) (b + c) = max a b + c :=
by rewrite [add.comm a c, add.comm b c, add.comm _ c]; apply nat.max_add_add_left
/- least and greatest -/
section least_and_greatest
variable (P : ℕ → Prop)
variable [decP : ∀ n, decidable (P n)]
include decP
-- returns the least i < n satisfying P, or n if there is none
definition least : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (succ n) := if P (least n) then least n else succ n
theorem least_of_bound {n : ℕ} (H : P n) : P (least P n) :=
begin
induction n with [m, ih],
rewrite ↑least,
apply H,
rewrite ↑least,
cases decidable.em (P (least P m)) with [Hlp, Hlp],
rewrite [if_pos Hlp],
apply Hlp,
rewrite [if_neg Hlp],
apply H
end
theorem least_le (n : ℕ) : least P n ≤ n:=
begin
induction n with [m, ih],
{rewrite ↑least},
rewrite ↑least,
cases decidable.em (P (least P m)) with [Psm, Pnsm],
rewrite [if_pos Psm],
apply le.trans ih !le_succ,
rewrite [if_neg Pnsm]
end
theorem least_of_lt {i n : ℕ} (ltin : i < n) (H : P i) : P (least P n) :=
begin
induction n with [m, ih],
exact absurd ltin !not_lt_zero,
rewrite ↑least,
cases decidable.em (P (least P m)) with [Psm, Pnsm],
rewrite [if_pos Psm],
apply Psm,
rewrite [if_neg Pnsm],
cases (lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ ltin)) with [Hlt, Heq],
exact absurd (ih Hlt) Pnsm,
rewrite Heq at H,
exact absurd (least_of_bound P H) Pnsm
end
theorem ge_least_of_lt {i n : ℕ} (ltin : i < n) (Hi : P i) : i ≥ least P n :=
begin
induction n with [m, ih],
exact absurd ltin !not_lt_zero,
rewrite ↑least,
cases decidable.em (P (least P m)) with [Psm, Pnsm],
rewrite [if_pos Psm],
cases (lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ ltin)) with [Hlt, Heq],
apply ih Hlt,
rewrite Heq,
apply least_le,
rewrite [if_neg Pnsm],
cases (lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ ltin)) with [Hlt, Heq],
apply absurd (least_of_lt P Hlt Hi) Pnsm,
rewrite Heq at Hi,
apply absurd (least_of_bound P Hi) Pnsm
end
theorem least_lt {n i : ℕ} (ltin : i < n) (Hi : P i) : least P n < n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (ge_least_of_lt P ltin Hi) ltin
-- returns the largest i < n satisfying P, or n if there is none.
definition greatest : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (succ n) := if P n then n else greatest n
theorem greatest_of_lt {i n : ℕ} (ltin : i < n) (Hi : P i) : P (greatest P n) :=
begin
induction n with [m, ih],
{exact absurd ltin !not_lt_zero},
{cases (decidable.em (P m)) with [Psm, Pnsm],
{rewrite [↑greatest, if_pos Psm]; exact Psm},
{rewrite [↑greatest, if_neg Pnsm],
have neim : i ≠ m, from assume H : i = m, absurd (H ▸ Hi) Pnsm,
have ltim : i < m, from lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_lt_succ ltin) neim,
apply ih ltim}}
end
theorem le_greatest_of_lt {i n : ℕ} (ltin : i < n) (Hi : P i) : i ≤ greatest P n :=
begin
induction n with [m, ih],
{exact absurd ltin !not_lt_zero},
{cases (decidable.em (P m)) with [Psm, Pnsm],
{rewrite [↑greatest, if_pos Psm], apply le_of_lt_succ ltin},
{rewrite [↑greatest, if_neg Pnsm],
have neim : i ≠ m, from assume H : i = m, absurd (H ▸ Hi) Pnsm,
have ltim : i < m, from lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_lt_succ ltin) neim,
apply ih ltim}}
end
end least_and_greatest
end nat
|
2709ea233cdb0c3d817397b5510ca5fc6dc05c16 | 95dcf8dea2baf2b4b0a60d438f27c35ae3dd3990 | /src/tactic/interactive.lean | e435c5bdfe31c787202aef7bf074c989f0c506c9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | uniformity1/mathlib | 829341bad9dfa6d6be9adaacb8086a8a492e85a4 | dd0e9bd8f2e5ec267f68e72336f6973311909105 | refs/heads/master | 1,588,592,015,670 | 1,554,219,842,000 | 1,554,219,842,000 | 179,110,702 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,554,220,076,000 | 1,554,220,076,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 28,600 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon, Sebastien Gouezel, Scott Morrison
-/
import data.dlist data.dlist.basic data.prod category.basic
tactic.basic tactic.rcases tactic.generalize_proofs
tactic.split_ifs logic.basic tactic.ext tactic.tauto
tactic.replacer tactic.simpa tactic.squeeze tactic.library_search
open lean
open lean.parser
local postfix `?`:9001 := optional
local postfix *:9001 := many
namespace tactic
namespace interactive
open interactive interactive.types expr
/--
The `rcases` tactic is the same as `cases`, but with more flexibility in the
`with` pattern syntax to allow for recursive case splitting. The pattern syntax
uses the following recursive grammar:
```
patt ::= (patt_list "|")* patt_list
patt_list ::= id | "_" | "⟨" (patt ",")* patt "⟩"
```
A pattern like `⟨a, b, c⟩ | ⟨d, e⟩` will do a split over the inductive datatype,
naming the first three parameters of the first constructor as `a,b,c` and the
first two of the second constructor `d,e`. If the list is not as long as the
number of arguments to the constructor or the number of constructors, the
remaining variables will be automatically named. If there are nested brackets
such as `⟨⟨a⟩, b | c⟩ | d` then these will cause more case splits as necessary.
If there are too many arguments, such as `⟨a, b, c⟩` for splitting on
`∃ x, ∃ y, p x`, then it will be treated as `⟨a, ⟨b, c⟩⟩`, splitting the last
parameter as necessary.
`rcases` also has special support for quotient types: quotient induction into Prop works like
matching on the constructor `quot.mk`.
`rcases? e` will perform case splits on `e` in the same way as `rcases e`,
but rather than accepting a pattern, it does a maximal cases and prints the
pattern that would produce this case splitting. The default maximum depth is 5,
but this can be modified with `rcases? e : n`.
-/
meta def rcases : parse rcases_parse → tactic unit
| (p, sum.inl ids) := tactic.rcases p ids
| (p, sum.inr depth) := do
patt ← tactic.rcases_hint p depth,
pe ← pp p,
trace $ ↑"snippet: rcases " ++ pe ++ " with " ++ to_fmt patt
/--
The `rintro` tactic is a combination of the `intros` tactic with `rcases` to
allow for destructuring patterns while introducing variables. See `rcases` for
a description of supported patterns. For example, `rintros (a | ⟨b, c⟩) ⟨d, e⟩`
will introduce two variables, and then do case splits on both of them producing
two subgoals, one with variables `a d e` and the other with `b c d e`.
`rintro?` will introduce and case split on variables in the same way as
`rintro`, but will also print the `rintro` invocation that would have the same
result. Like `rcases?`, `rintro? : n` allows for modifying the
depth of splitting; the default is 5.
-/
meta def rintro : parse rintro_parse → tactic unit
| (sum.inl []) := intros []
| (sum.inl l) := tactic.rintro l
| (sum.inr depth) := do
ps ← tactic.rintro_hint depth,
trace $ ↑"snippet: rintro" ++ format.join (ps.map $ λ p,
format.space ++ format.group (p.format tt))
/-- Alias for `rintro`. -/
meta def rintros := rintro
/-- `try_for n { tac }` executes `tac` for `n` ticks, otherwise uses `sorry` to close the goal.
Never fails. Useful for debugging. -/
meta def try_for (max : parse parser.pexpr) (tac : itactic) : tactic unit :=
do max ← i_to_expr_strict max >>= tactic.eval_expr nat,
λ s, match _root_.try_for max (tac s) with
| some r := r
| none := (tactic.trace "try_for timeout, using sorry" >> admit) s
end
/-- Multiple subst. `substs x y z` is the same as `subst x, subst y, subst z`. -/
meta def substs (l : parse ident*) : tactic unit :=
l.mmap' (λ h, get_local h >>= tactic.subst) >> try (tactic.reflexivity reducible)
/-- Unfold coercion-related definitions -/
meta def unfold_coes (loc : parse location) : tactic unit :=
unfold [
``coe, ``coe_t, ``has_coe_t.coe, ``coe_b,``has_coe.coe,
``lift, ``has_lift.lift, ``lift_t, ``has_lift_t.lift,
``coe_fn, ``has_coe_to_fun.coe, ``coe_sort, ``has_coe_to_sort.coe] loc
/-- Unfold auxiliary definitions associated with the current declaration. -/
meta def unfold_aux : tactic unit :=
do tgt ← target,
name ← decl_name,
let to_unfold := (tgt.list_names_with_prefix name),
guard (¬ to_unfold.empty),
-- should we be using simp_lemmas.mk_default?
simp_lemmas.mk.dsimplify to_unfold.to_list tgt >>= tactic.change
/-- For debugging only. This tactic checks the current state for any
missing dropped goals and restores them. Useful when there are no
goals to solve but "result contains meta-variables". -/
meta def recover : tactic unit :=
metavariables >>= tactic.set_goals
/-- Like `try { tac }`, but in the case of failure it continues
from the failure state instead of reverting to the original state. -/
meta def continue (tac : itactic) : tactic unit :=
λ s, result.cases_on (tac s)
(λ a, result.success ())
(λ e ref, result.success ())
/-- Move goal `n` to the front. -/
meta def swap (n := 2) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs.nth (n-1) with
| (some g) := set_goals (g :: gs.remove_nth (n-1))
| _ := skip
end
/-- Generalize proofs in the goal, naming them with the provided list. -/
meta def generalize_proofs : parse ident_* → tactic unit :=
tactic.generalize_proofs
/-- Clear all hypotheses starting with `_`, like `_match` and `_let_match`. -/
meta def clear_ : tactic unit := tactic.repeat $ do
l ← local_context,
l.reverse.mfirst $ λ h, do
name.mk_string s p ← return $ local_pp_name h,
guard (s.front = '_'),
cl ← infer_type h >>= is_class, guard (¬ cl),
tactic.clear h
meta def apply_iff_congr_core (tgt : expr) : tactic unit :=
do applyc ``iff_of_eq,
(lhs, rhs) ← target >>= match_eq,
guard lhs.is_app,
clemma ← mk_specialized_congr_lemma lhs,
apply_congr_core clemma
meta def congr_core' : tactic unit :=
do tgt ← target,
apply_eq_congr_core tgt
<|> apply_heq_congr_core
<|> apply_iff_congr_core tgt
<|> fail "congr tactic failed"
/--
Same as the `congr` tactic, but takes an optional argument which gives
the depth of recursive applications. This is useful when `congr`
is too aggressive in breaking down the goal. For example, given
`⊢ f (g (x + y)) = f (g (y + x))`, `congr'` produces the goals `⊢ x = y`
and `⊢ y = x`, while `congr' 2` produces the intended `⊢ x + y = y + x`. -/
meta def congr' : parse (with_desc "n" small_nat)? → tactic unit
| (some 0) := failed
| o := focus1 (assumption <|> (congr_core' >>
all_goals (reflexivity <|> `[apply proof_irrel_heq] <|>
`[apply proof_irrel] <|> try (congr' (nat.pred <$> o)))))
/--
Acts like `have`, but removes a hypothesis with the same name as
this one. For example if the state is `h : p ⊢ goal` and `f : p → q`,
then after `replace h := f h` the goal will be `h : q ⊢ goal`,
where `have h := f h` would result in the state `h : p, h : q ⊢ goal`.
This can be used to simulate the `specialize` and `apply at` tactics
of Coq. -/
meta def replace (h : parse ident?) (q₁ : parse (tk ":" *> texpr)?) (q₂ : parse $ (tk ":=" *> texpr)?) : tactic unit :=
do let h := h.get_or_else `this,
old ← try_core (get_local h),
«have» h q₁ q₂,
match old, q₂ with
| none, _ := skip
| some o, some _ := tactic.clear o
| some o, none := swap >> tactic.clear o >> swap
end
/--
`apply_assumption` looks for an assumption of the form `... → ∀ _, ... → head`
where `head` matches the current goal.
alternatively, when encountering an assumption of the form `sg₀ → ¬ sg₁`,
after the main approach failed, the goal is dismissed and `sg₀` and `sg₁`
are made into the new goal.
optional arguments:
- asms: list of rules to consider instead of the local constants
- tac: a tactic to run on each subgoals after applying an assumption; if
this tactic fails, the corresponding assumption will be rejected and
the next one will be attempted.
-/
meta def apply_assumption
(asms : tactic (list expr) := local_context)
(tac : tactic unit := return ()) : tactic unit :=
tactic.apply_assumption asms tac
open nat
meta def mk_assumption_set (no_dflt : bool) (hs : list simp_arg_type) (attr : list name): tactic (list expr) :=
do (hs, gex, hex, all_hyps) ← decode_simp_arg_list hs,
hs ← hs.mmap i_to_expr_for_apply,
l ← attr.mmap $ λ a, attribute.get_instances a,
let l := l.join,
m ← list.mmap mk_const l,
let hs := (hs ++ m).filter $ λ h, expr.const_name h ∉ gex,
hs ← if no_dflt then
return hs
else
do { congr_fun ← mk_const `congr_fun,
congr_arg ← mk_const `congr_arg,
return (congr_fun :: congr_arg :: hs) },
if ¬ no_dflt ∨ all_hyps then do
ctx ← local_context,
return $ hs.append (ctx.filter (λ h, h.local_uniq_name ∉ hex)) -- remove local exceptions
else return hs
/--
`solve_by_elim` calls `apply_assumption` on the main goal to find an assumption whose head matches
and then repeatedly calls `apply_assumption` on the generated subgoals until no subgoals remain,
performing at most `max_rep` recursive steps.
`solve_by_elim` discharges the current goal or fails
`solve_by_elim` performs back-tracking if `apply_assumption` chooses an unproductive assumption
By default, the assumptions passed to apply_assumption are the local context, `congr_fun` and
`congr_arg`.
`solve_by_elim [h₁, h₂, ..., hᵣ]` also applies the named lemmas.
`solve_by_elim with attr₁ ... attrᵣ also applied all lemmas tagged with the specified attributes.
`solve_by_elim only [h₁, h₂, ..., hᵣ]` does not include the local context, `congr_fun`, or `congr_arg`
unless they are explicitly included.
`solve_by_elim [-id]` removes a specified assumption.
`solve_by_elim*` tries to solve all goals together, using backtracking if a solution for one goal
makes other goals impossible.
optional arguments:
- discharger: a subsidiary tactic to try at each step (e.g. `cc` may be helpful)
- max_rep: number of attempts at discharging generated sub-goals
-/
meta def solve_by_elim (all_goals : parse $ (tk "*")?) (no_dflt : parse only_flag) (hs : parse simp_arg_list) (attr_names : parse with_ident_list) (opt : by_elim_opt := { }) : tactic unit :=
do asms ← mk_assumption_set no_dflt hs attr_names,
tactic.solve_by_elim { all_goals := all_goals.is_some, assumptions := return asms, ..opt }
/--
`tautology` breaks down assumptions of the form `_ ∧ _`, `_ ∨ _`, `_ ↔ _` and `∃ _, _`
and splits a goal of the form `_ ∧ _`, `_ ↔ _` or `∃ _, _` until it can be discharged
using `reflexivity` or `solve_by_elim`
-/
meta def tautology (c : parse $ (tk "!")?) := tactic.tautology c.is_some
/-- Shorter name for the tactic `tautology`. -/
meta def tauto (c : parse $ (tk "!")?) := tautology c
/-- Make every propositions in the context decidable -/
meta def classical := tactic.classical
private meta def generalize_arg_p_aux : pexpr → parser (pexpr × name)
| (app (app (macro _ [const `eq _ ]) h) (local_const x _ _ _)) := pure (h, x)
| _ := fail "parse error"
private meta def generalize_arg_p : parser (pexpr × name) :=
with_desc "expr = id" $ parser.pexpr 0 >>= generalize_arg_p_aux
lemma {u} generalize_a_aux {α : Sort u}
(h : ∀ x : Sort u, (α → x) → x) : α := h α id
/--
Like `generalize` but also considers assumptions
specified by the user. The user can also specify to
omit the goal.
-/
meta def generalize_hyp (h : parse ident?) (_ : parse $ tk ":")
(p : parse generalize_arg_p)
(l : parse location) :
tactic unit :=
do h' ← get_unused_name `h,
x' ← get_unused_name `x,
g ← if ¬ l.include_goal then
do refine ``(generalize_a_aux _),
some <$> (prod.mk <$> tactic.intro x' <*> tactic.intro h')
else pure none,
n ← l.get_locals >>= tactic.revert_lst,
generalize h () p,
intron n,
match g with
| some (x',h') :=
do tactic.apply h',
tactic.clear h',
tactic.clear x'
| none := return ()
end
/--
Similar to `refine` but generates equality proof obligations
for every discrepancy between the goal and the type of the rule.
-/
meta def convert (sym : parse (with_desc "←" (tk "<-")?)) (r : parse texpr) (n : parse (tk "using" *> small_nat)?) : tactic unit :=
do v ← mk_mvar,
if sym.is_some
then refine ``(eq.mp %%v %%r)
else refine ``(eq.mpr %%v %%r),
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [v],
congr' n,
gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals $ gs' ++ gs
meta def clean_ids : list name :=
[``id, ``id_rhs, ``id_delta, ``hidden]
/--
Remove identity functions from a term. These are normally
automatically generated with terms like `show t, from p` or
`(p : t)` which translate to some variant on `@id t p` in
order to retain the type. -/
meta def clean (q : parse texpr) : tactic unit :=
do tgt : expr ← target,
e ← i_to_expr_strict ``(%%q : %%tgt),
tactic.exact $ e.replace (λ e n,
match e with
| (app (app (const n _) _) e') :=
if n ∈ clean_ids then some e' else none
| (app (lam _ _ _ (var 0)) e') := some e'
| _ := none
end)
meta def source_fields (missing : list name) (e : pexpr) : tactic (list (name × pexpr)) :=
do e ← to_expr e,
t ← infer_type e,
let struct_n : name := t.get_app_fn.const_name,
fields ← expanded_field_list struct_n,
let exp_fields := fields.filter (λ x, x.2 ∈ missing),
exp_fields.mmap $ λ ⟨p,n⟩,
(prod.mk n ∘ to_pexpr) <$> mk_mapp (n.update_prefix p) [none,some e]
meta def collect_struct' : pexpr → state_t (list $ expr×structure_instance_info) tactic pexpr | e :=
do some str ← pure (e.get_structure_instance_info)
| e.traverse collect_struct',
v ← monad_lift mk_mvar,
modify (list.cons (v,str)),
pure $ to_pexpr v
meta def collect_struct (e : pexpr) : tactic $ pexpr × list (expr×structure_instance_info) :=
prod.map id list.reverse <$> (collect_struct' e).run []
meta def refine_one (str : structure_instance_info) :
tactic $ list (expr×structure_instance_info) :=
do tgt ← target,
let struct_n : name := tgt.get_app_fn.const_name,
exp_fields ← expanded_field_list struct_n,
let missing_f := exp_fields.filter (λ f, (f.2 : name) ∉ str.field_names),
(src_field_names,src_field_vals) ← (@list.unzip name _ ∘ list.join) <$> str.sources.mmap (source_fields $ missing_f.map prod.snd),
let provided := exp_fields.filter (λ f, (f.2 : name) ∈ str.field_names),
let missing_f' := missing_f.filter (λ x, x.2 ∉ src_field_names),
vs ← mk_mvar_list missing_f'.length,
(field_values,new_goals) ← list.unzip <$> (str.field_values.mmap collect_struct : tactic _),
e' ← to_expr $ pexpr.mk_structure_instance
{ struct := some struct_n
, field_names := str.field_names ++ missing_f'.map prod.snd ++ src_field_names
, field_values := field_values ++ vs.map to_pexpr ++ src_field_vals },
tactic.exact e',
gs ← with_enable_tags (
mzip_with (λ (n : name × name) v, do
set_goals [v],
try (interactive.unfold (provided.map $ λ ⟨s,f⟩, f.update_prefix s) (loc.ns [none])),
apply_auto_param
<|> apply_opt_param
<|> (set_main_tag [`_field,n.2,n.1]),
get_goals)
missing_f' vs),
set_goals gs.join,
return new_goals.join
meta def refine_recursively : expr × structure_instance_info → tactic (list expr) | (e,str) :=
do set_goals [e],
rs ← refine_one str,
gs ← get_goals,
gs' ← rs.mmap refine_recursively,
return $ gs'.join ++ gs
/--
`refine_struct { .. }` acts like `refine` but works only with structure instance
literals. It creates a goal for each missing field and tags it with the name of the
field so that `have_field` can be used to generically refer to the field currently
being refined.
As an example, we can use `refine_struct` to automate the construction semigroup
instances:
```
refine_struct ( { .. } : semigroup α ),
-- case semigroup, mul
-- α : Type u,
-- ⊢ α → α → α
-- case semigroup, mul_assoc
-- α : Type u,
-- ⊢ ∀ (a b c : α), a * b * c = a * (b * c)
```
-/
meta def refine_struct : parse texpr → tactic unit | e :=
do (x,xs) ← collect_struct e,
refine x,
gs ← get_goals,
xs' ← xs.mmap refine_recursively,
set_goals (xs'.join ++ gs)
/--
`guard_hyp h := t` fails if the hypothesis `h` does not have type `t`.
We use this tactic for writing tests.
Fixes `guard_hyp` by instantiating meta variables
-/
meta def guard_hyp' (n : parse ident) (p : parse $ tk ":=" *> texpr) : tactic unit :=
do h ← get_local n >>= infer_type >>= instantiate_mvars, guard_expr_eq h p
/--
`guard_expr_strict t := e` fails if the expr `t` is not equal to `e`. By contrast
to `guard_expr`, this tests strict (syntactic) equality.
We use this tactic for writing tests.
-/
meta def guard_expr_strict (t : expr) (p : parse $ tk ":=" *> texpr) : tactic unit :=
do e ← to_expr p, guard (t = e)
/--
`guard_target_strict t` fails if the target of the main goal is not syntactically `t`.
We use this tactic for writing tests.
-/
meta def guard_target_strict (p : parse texpr) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target, guard_expr_strict t p
/--
`guard_hyp_strict h := t` fails if the hypothesis `h` does not have type syntactically equal
to `t`.
We use this tactic for writing tests.
-/
meta def guard_hyp_strict (n : parse ident) (p : parse $ tk ":=" *> texpr) : tactic unit :=
do h ← get_local n >>= infer_type >>= instantiate_mvars, guard_expr_strict h p
meta def guard_hyp_nums (n : ℕ) : tactic unit :=
do k ← local_context,
guard (n = k.length) <|> fail format!"{k.length} hypotheses found"
meta def guard_tags (tags : parse ident*) : tactic unit :=
do (t : list name) ← get_main_tag,
guard (t = tags)
meta def get_current_field : tactic name :=
do [_,field,str] ← get_main_tag,
expr.const_name <$> resolve_name (field.update_prefix str)
meta def field (n : parse ident) (tac : itactic) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
ts ← gs.mmap get_tag,
([g],gs') ← pure $ (list.zip gs ts).partition (λ x, x.snd.nth 1 = some n),
set_goals [g.1],
tac, done,
set_goals $ gs'.map prod.fst
/--
`have_field`, used after `refine_struct _` poses `field` as a local constant
with the type of the field of the current goal:
```
refine_struct ({ .. } : semigroup α),
{ have_field, ... },
{ have_field, ... },
```
behaves like
```
refine_struct ({ .. } : semigroup α),
{ have field := @semigroup.mul, ... },
{ have field := @semigroup.mul_assoc, ... },
```
-/
meta def have_field : tactic unit :=
propagate_tags $
get_current_field
>>= mk_const
>>= note `field none
>> return ()
/-- `apply_field` functions as `have_field, apply field, clear field` -/
meta def apply_field : tactic unit :=
propagate_tags $
get_current_field >>= applyc
/--`apply_rules hs n`: apply the list of rules `hs` (given as pexpr) and `assumption` on the
first goal and the resulting subgoals, iteratively, at most `n` times.
`n` is 50 by default. `hs` can contain user attributes: in this case all theorems with this
attribute are added to the list of rules.
example, with or without user attribute:
```
@[user_attribute]
meta def mono_rules : user_attribute :=
{ name := `mono_rules,
descr := "lemmas usable to prove monotonicity" }
attribute [mono_rules] add_le_add mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
lemma my_test {a b c d e : real} (h1 : a ≤ b) (h2 : c ≤ d) (h3 : 0 ≤ e) :
a + c * e + a + c + 0 ≤ b + d * e + b + d + e :=
by apply_rules mono_rules
-- any of the following lines would also work:
-- add_le_add (add_le_add (add_le_add (add_le_add h1 (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h2 h3)) h1 ) h2) h3
-- by apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right]
-- by apply_rules [mono_rules]
```
-/
meta def apply_rules (hs : parse pexpr_list_or_texpr) (n : nat := 50) : tactic unit :=
tactic.apply_rules hs n
meta def return_cast (f : option expr) (t : option (expr × expr))
(es : list (expr × expr × expr))
(e x x' eq_h : expr) :
tactic (option (expr × expr) × list (expr × expr × expr)) :=
(do guard (¬ e.has_var),
unify x x',
u ← mk_meta_univ,
f ← f <|> mk_mapp ``_root_.id [(expr.sort u : expr)],
t' ← infer_type e,
some (f',t) ← pure t | return (some (f,t'), (e,x',eq_h) :: es),
infer_type e >>= is_def_eq t,
unify f f',
return (some (f,t), (e,x',eq_h) :: es)) <|>
return (t, es)
meta def list_cast_of_aux (x : expr) (t : option (expr × expr))
(es : list (expr × expr × expr)) :
expr → tactic (option (expr × expr) × list (expr × expr × expr))
| e@`(cast %%eq_h %%x') := return_cast none t es e x x' eq_h
| e@`(eq.mp %%eq_h %%x') := return_cast none t es e x x' eq_h
| e@`(eq.mpr %%eq_h %%x') := mk_eq_symm eq_h >>= return_cast none t es e x x'
| e@`(@eq.subst %%α %%p %%a %%b %%eq_h %%x') := return_cast p t es e x x' eq_h
| e@`(@eq.substr %%α %%p %%a %%b %%eq_h %%x') := mk_eq_symm eq_h >>= return_cast p t es e x x'
| e@`(@eq.rec %%α %%a %%f %%x' _ %%eq_h) := return_cast f t es e x x' eq_h
| e@`(@eq.rec_on %%α %%a %%f %%b %%eq_h %%x') := return_cast f t es e x x' eq_h
| e := return (t,es)
meta def list_cast_of (x tgt : expr) : tactic (list (expr × expr × expr)) :=
(list.reverse ∘ prod.snd) <$> tgt.mfold (none, []) (λ e i es, list_cast_of_aux x es.1 es.2 e)
private meta def h_generalize_arg_p_aux : pexpr → parser (pexpr × name)
| (app (app (macro _ [const `heq _ ]) h) (local_const x _ _ _)) := pure (h, x)
| _ := fail "parse error"
private meta def h_generalize_arg_p : parser (pexpr × name) :=
with_desc "expr == id" $ parser.pexpr 0 >>= h_generalize_arg_p_aux
/--
`h_generalize Hx : e == x` matches on `cast _ e` in the goal and replaces it with
`x`. It also adds `Hx : e == x` as an assumption. If `cast _ e` appears multiple
times (not necessarily with the same proof), they are all replaced by `x`. `cast`
`eq.mp`, `eq.mpr`, `eq.subst`, `eq.substr`, `eq.rec` and `eq.rec_on` are all treated
as casts.
`h_generalize Hx : e == x with h` adds hypothesis `α = β` with `e : α, x : β`.
`h_generalize Hx : e == x with _` chooses automatically chooses the name of
assumption `α = β`.
`h_generalize! Hx : e == x` reverts `Hx`.
when `Hx` is omitted, assumption `Hx : e == x` is not added.
-/
meta def h_generalize (rev : parse (tk "!")?)
(h : parse ident_?)
(_ : parse (tk ":"))
(arg : parse h_generalize_arg_p)
(eqs_h : parse ( (tk "with" >> pure <$> ident_) <|> pure [])) :
tactic unit :=
do let (e,n) := arg,
let h' := if h = `_ then none else h,
h' ← (h' : tactic name) <|> get_unused_name ("h" ++ n.to_string : string),
e ← to_expr e,
tgt ← target,
((e,x,eq_h)::es) ← list_cast_of e tgt | fail "no cast found",
interactive.generalize h' () (to_pexpr e, n),
asm ← get_local h',
v ← get_local n,
hs ← es.mmap (λ ⟨e,_⟩, mk_app `eq [e,v]),
(eqs_h.zip [e]).mmap' (λ ⟨h,e⟩, do
h ← if h ≠ `_ then pure h else get_unused_name `h,
() <$ note h none eq_h ),
hs.mmap' (λ h,
do h' ← assert `h h,
tactic.exact asm,
try (rewrite_target h'),
tactic.clear h' ),
when h.is_some (do
(to_expr ``(heq_of_eq_rec_left %%eq_h %%asm)
<|> to_expr ``(heq_of_eq_mp %%eq_h %%asm))
>>= note h' none >> pure ()),
tactic.clear asm,
when rev.is_some (interactive.revert [n])
/-- `choose a b h using hyp` takes an hypothesis `hyp` of the form
`∀ (x : X) (y : Y), ∃ (a : A) (b : B), P x y a b` for some `P : X → Y → A → B → Prop` and outputs
into context a function `a : X → Y → A`, `b : X → Y → B` and a proposition `h` stating
`∀ (x : X) (y : Y), P x y (a x y) (b x y)`. It presumably also works with dependent versions.
Example:
```lean
example (h : ∀n m : ℕ, ∃i j, m = n + i ∨ m + j = n) : true :=
begin
choose i j h using h,
guard_hyp i := ℕ → ℕ → ℕ,
guard_hyp j := ℕ → ℕ → ℕ,
guard_hyp h := ∀ (n m : ℕ), m = n + i n m ∨ m + j n m = n,
trivial
end
```
-/
meta def choose (first : parse ident) (names : parse ident*) (tgt : parse (tk "using" *> texpr)?) :
tactic unit := do
tgt ← match tgt with
| none := get_local `this
| some e := tactic.i_to_expr_strict e
end,
tactic.choose tgt (first :: names),
try (tactic.clear tgt)
meta def guard_expr_eq' (t : expr) (p : parse $ tk ":=" *> texpr) : tactic unit :=
do e ← to_expr p, is_def_eq t e
/--
`guard_target t` fails if the target of the main goal is not `t`.
We use this tactic for writing tests.
-/
meta def guard_target' (p : parse texpr) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target, guard_expr_eq' t p
/--
a weaker version of `trivial` that tries to solve the goal by reflexivity or by reducing it to true,
unfolding only `reducible` constants. -/
meta def triv : tactic unit :=
tactic.triv' <|> tactic.reflexivity reducible <|> tactic.contradiction <|> fail "triv tactic failed"
/--
Similar to `existsi`. `use x` will instantiate the first term of an `∃` or `Σ` goal with `x`.
Unlike `existsi`, `x` is elaborated with respect to the expected type.
`use` will alternatively take a list of terms `[x0, ..., xn]`.
`use` will work with constructors of arbitrary inductive types.
Examples:
example (α : Type) : ∃ S : set α, S = S :=
by use ∅
example : ∃ x : ℤ, x = x :=
by use 42
example : ∃ a b c : ℤ, a + b + c = 6 :=
by use [1, 2, 3]
example : ∃ p : ℤ × ℤ, p.1 = 1 :=
by use ⟨1, 42⟩
example : Σ x y : ℤ, (ℤ × ℤ) × ℤ :=
by use [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
inductive foo
| mk : ℕ → bool × ℕ → ℕ → foo
example : foo :=
by use [100, tt, 4, 3]
-/
meta def use (l : parse pexpr_list_or_texpr) : tactic unit :=
tactic.use l >> try triv
/--
`clear_aux_decl` clears every `aux_decl` in the local context for the current goal.
This includes the induction hypothesis when using the equation compiler and
`_let_match` and `_fun_match`.
It is useful when using a tactic such as `finish`, `simp *` or `subst` that may use these
auxiliary declarations, and produce an error saying the recursion is not well founded.
-/
meta def clear_aux_decl : tactic unit := tactic.clear_aux_decl
meta def loc.get_local_pp_names : loc → tactic (list name)
| loc.wildcard := list.map expr.local_pp_name <$> local_context
| (loc.ns l) := return l.reduce_option
meta def loc.get_local_uniq_names (l : loc) : tactic (list name) :=
list.map expr.local_uniq_name <$> l.get_locals
/--
The logic of `change x with y at l` fails when there are dependencies.
`change'` mimics the behavior of `change`, except in the case of `change x with y at l`.
In this case, it will correctly replace occurences of `x` with `y` at all possible hypotheses in `l`.
As long as `x` and `y` are defeq, it should never fail.
-/
meta def change' (q : parse texpr) : parse (tk "with" *> texpr)? → parse location → tactic unit
| none (loc.ns [none]) := do e ← i_to_expr q, change_core e none
| none (loc.ns [some h]) := do eq ← i_to_expr q, eh ← get_local h, change_core eq (some eh)
| none _ := fail "change-at does not support multiple locations"
| (some w) l :=
do l' ← loc.get_local_pp_names l,
l'.mmap' (λ e, try (change_with_at q w e)),
when l.include_goal $ change q w (loc.ns [none])
private meta def opt_dir_with : parser (option (bool × name)) :=
(do tk "with",
arrow ← (tk "<-")?,
h ← ident,
return (arrow.is_some, h)) <|> return none
/--
`set a := t with h` is a variant of `let a := t`.
It adds the hypothesis `h : a = t` to the local context and replaces `t` with `a` everywhere it can.
`set a := t with ←h` will add `h : t = a` instead.
`set! a := t with h` does not do any replacing.
-/
meta def set (h_simp : parse (tk "!")?) (a : parse ident) (tp : parse ((tk ":") >> texpr)?) (_ : parse (tk ":=")) (pv : parse texpr)
(rev_name : parse opt_dir_with) :=
do let vt := match tp with | some t := t | none := pexpr.mk_placeholder end,
let pv := ``(%%pv : %%vt),
v ← to_expr pv,
tp ← infer_type v,
definev a tp v,
when h_simp.is_none $ change' pv (some (expr.const a [])) loc.wildcard,
match rev_name with
| some (flip, id) :=
do nv ← get_local a,
pf ← to_expr (cond flip ``(%%pv = %%nv) ``(%%nv = %%pv)) >>= assert id,
reflexivity
| none := skip
end
end interactive
end tactic
|
e4f3025bbd27b710cb5b68d3e7c3900d1d0d7396 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/category_theory/isomorphism_classes.lean | 95b89f88ae068fd03106a0013c29330038ee1935 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,629 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import category_theory.category.Cat
import category_theory.groupoid
/-!
# Objects of a category up to an isomorphism
`is_isomorphic X Y := nonempty (X ≅ Y)` is an equivalence relation on the objects of a category.
The quotient with respect to this relation defines a functor from our category to `Type`.
-/
universes v u
namespace category_theory
section category
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
/-- An object `X` is isomorphic to an object `Y`, if `X ≅ Y` is not empty. -/
def is_isomorphic : C → C → Prop := λ X Y, nonempty (X ≅ Y)
variable (C)
/-- `is_isomorphic` defines a setoid. -/
def is_isomorphic_setoid : setoid C :=
{ r := is_isomorphic,
iseqv := ⟨λ X, ⟨iso.refl X⟩, λ X Y ⟨α⟩, ⟨α.symm⟩, λ X Y Z ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩, ⟨α.trans β⟩⟩ }
end category
/--
The functor that sends each category to the quotient space of its objects up to an isomorphism.
-/
def isomorphism_classes : Cat.{v u} ⥤ Type u :=
{ obj := λ C, quotient (is_isomorphic_setoid C.α),
map := λ C D F, quot.map F.obj $ λ X Y ⟨f⟩, ⟨F.map_iso f⟩ }
lemma groupoid.is_isomorphic_iff_nonempty_hom {C : Type u} [groupoid.{v} C] {X Y : C} :
is_isomorphic X Y ↔ nonempty (X ⟶ Y) :=
(groupoid.iso_equiv_hom X Y).nonempty_iff_nonempty
-- PROJECT: define `skeletal`, and show every category is equivalent to a skeletal category,
-- using the axiom of choice to pick a representative of every isomorphism class.
end category_theory
|
d1eb17513cf30aa56b86e7a57be42eb415762205 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/group_theory/divisible.lean | d31c71515a3e6e6f526c4d385fb3977c6addcce3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,624 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang
-/
import group_theory.subgroup.pointwise
import group_theory.quotient_group
import algebra.group.pi
/-!
# Divisible Group and rootable group
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file, we define a divisible add monoid and a rootable monoid with some basic properties.
## Main definition
* `divisible_by A α`: An additive monoid `A` is said to be divisible by `α` iff for all `n ≠ 0 ∈ α`
and `y ∈ A`, there is an `x ∈ A` such that `n • x = y`. In this file, we adopt a constructive
approach, i.e. we ask for an explicit `div : A → α → A` function such that `div a 0 = 0` and
`n • div a n = a` for all `n ≠ 0 ∈ α`.
* `rootable_by A α`: A monoid `A` is said to be rootable by `α` iff for all `n ≠ 0 ∈ α` and `y ∈ A`,
there is an `x ∈ A` such that `x^n = y`. In this file, we adopt a constructive approach, i.e. we
ask for an explicit `root : A → α → A` function such that `root a 0 = 1` and `(root a n)ⁿ = a` for
all `n ≠ 0 ∈ α`.
## Main results
For additive monoids and groups:
* `divisible_by_of_smul_right_surj` : the constructive definition of divisiblity is implied by
the condition that `n • x = a` has solutions for all `n ≠ 0` and `a ∈ A`.
* `smul_right_surj_of_divisible_by` : the constructive definition of divisiblity implies
the condition that `n • x = a` has solutions for all `n ≠ 0` and `a ∈ A`.
* `prod.divisible_by` : `A × B` is divisible for any two divisible additive monoids.
* `pi.divisible_by` : any product of divisble additive monoids is divisible.
* `add_group.divisible_by_int_of_divisible_by_nat` : for additive groups, int divisiblity is implied
by nat divisiblity.
* `add_group.divisible_by_nat_of_divisible_by_int` : for additive groups, nat divisiblity is implied
by int divisiblity.
* `add_comm_group.divisible_by_int_of_smul_top_eq_top`: the constructive definition of divisiblity
is implied by the condition that `n • A = A` for all `n ≠ 0`.
* `add_comm_group.smul_top_eq_top_of_divisible_by_int`: the constructive definition of divisiblity
implies the condition that `n • A = A` for all `n ≠ 0`.
* `divisible_by_int_of_char_zero` : any field of characteristic zero is divisible.
* `quotient_add_group.divisible_by` : quotient group of divisible group is divisible.
* `function.surjective.divisible_by` : if `A` is divisible and `A →+ B` is surjective, then `B`
is divisible.
and their multiplicative counterparts:
* `rootable_by_of_pow_left_surj` : the constructive definition of rootablity is implied by the
condition that `xⁿ = y` has solutions for all `n ≠ 0` and `a ∈ A`.
* `pow_left_surj_of_rootable_by` : the constructive definition of rootablity implies the
condition that `xⁿ = y` has solutions for all `n ≠ 0` and `a ∈ A`.
* `prod.rootable_by` : any product of two rootable monoids is rootable.
* `pi.rootable_by` : any product of rootable monoids is rootable.
* `group.rootable_by_int_of_rootable_by_nat` : in groups, int rootablity is implied by nat
rootablity.
* `group.rootable_by_nat_of_rootable_by_int` : in groups, nat rootablity is implied by int
rootablity.
* `quotient_group.rootable_by` : quotient group of rootable group is rootable.
* `function.surjective.rootable_by` : if `A` is rootable and `A →* B` is surjective, then `B` is
rootable.
TODO: Show that divisibility implies injectivity in the category of `AddCommGroup`.
-/
open_locale pointwise
section add_monoid
variables (A α : Type*) [add_monoid A] [has_smul α A] [has_zero α]
/--
An `add_monoid A` is `α`-divisible iff `n • x = a` has a solution for all `n ≠ 0 ∈ α` and `a ∈ A`.
Here we adopt a constructive approach where we ask an explicit `div : A → α → A` function such that
* `div a 0 = 0` for all `a ∈ A`
* `n • div a n = a` for all `n ≠ 0 ∈ α` and `a ∈ A`.
-/
class divisible_by :=
(div : A → α → A)
(div_zero : ∀ a, div a 0 = 0)
(div_cancel : ∀ {n : α} (a : A), n ≠ 0 → n • (div a n) = a)
end add_monoid
section monoid
variables (A α : Type*) [monoid A] [has_pow A α] [has_zero α]
/--
A `monoid A` is `α`-rootable iff `xⁿ = a` has a solution for all `n ≠ 0 ∈ α` and `a ∈ A`.
Here we adopt a constructive approach where we ask an explicit `root : A → α → A` function such that
* `root a 0 = 1` for all `a ∈ A`
* `(root a n)ⁿ = a` for all `n ≠ 0 ∈ α` and `a ∈ A`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class rootable_by :=
(root : A → α → A)
(root_zero : ∀ a, root a 0 = 1)
(root_cancel : ∀ {n : α} (a : A), n ≠ 0 → (root a n)^n = a)
@[to_additive smul_right_surj_of_divisible_by]
lemma pow_left_surj_of_rootable_by [rootable_by A α] {n : α} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
function.surjective (λ a, pow a n : A → A) :=
λ x, ⟨rootable_by.root x n, rootable_by.root_cancel _ hn⟩
/--
A `monoid A` is `α`-rootable iff the `pow _ n` function is surjective, i.e. the constructive version
implies the textbook approach.
-/
@[to_additive divisible_by_of_smul_right_surj
"An `add_monoid A` is `α`-divisible iff `n • _` is a surjective function, i.e. the constructive
version implies the textbook approach."]
noncomputable def rootable_by_of_pow_left_surj
(H : ∀ {n : α}, n ≠ 0 → function.surjective (λ a, a^n : A → A)) :
rootable_by A α :=
{ root := λ a n, @dite _ (n = 0) (classical.dec _) (λ _, (1 : A)) (λ hn, (H hn a).some),
root_zero := λ _, by classical; exact dif_pos rfl,
root_cancel := λ n a hn, by { classical, rw dif_neg hn, exact (H hn a).some_spec } }
section pi
variables {ι β : Type*} (B : ι → Type*) [Π (i : ι), has_pow (B i) β]
variables [has_zero β] [Π (i : ι), monoid (B i)] [Π i, rootable_by (B i) β]
@[to_additive]
instance pi.rootable_by : rootable_by (Π i, B i) β :=
{ root := λ x n i, rootable_by.root (x i) n,
root_zero := λ x, funext $ λ i, rootable_by.root_zero _,
root_cancel := λ n x hn, funext $ λ i, rootable_by.root_cancel _ hn }
end pi
section prod
variables {β B B' : Type*} [has_pow B β] [has_pow B' β]
variables [has_zero β] [monoid B] [monoid B'] [rootable_by B β] [rootable_by B' β]
@[to_additive]
instance prod.rootable_by : rootable_by (B × B') β :=
{ root := λ p n, (rootable_by.root p.1 n, rootable_by.root p.2 n),
root_zero := λ p, prod.ext (rootable_by.root_zero _) (rootable_by.root_zero _),
root_cancel := λ n p hn, prod.ext (rootable_by.root_cancel _ hn) (rootable_by.root_cancel _ hn) }
end prod
end monoid
namespace add_comm_group
variables (A : Type*) [add_comm_group A]
lemma smul_top_eq_top_of_divisible_by_int [divisible_by A ℤ] {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
n • (⊤ : add_subgroup A) = ⊤ :=
add_subgroup.map_top_of_surjective _ $ λ a, ⟨divisible_by.div a n, divisible_by.div_cancel _ hn⟩
/--
If for all `n ≠ 0 ∈ ℤ`, `n • A = A`, then `A` is divisible.
-/
noncomputable def divisible_by_int_of_smul_top_eq_top
(H : ∀ {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0), n • (⊤ : add_subgroup A) = ⊤) :
divisible_by A ℤ :=
{ div := λ a n, if hn : n = 0 then 0 else
(show a ∈ n • (⊤ : add_subgroup A), by rw [H hn]; trivial).some,
div_zero := λ a, dif_pos rfl,
div_cancel := λ n a hn, begin
rw [dif_neg hn],
generalize_proofs h1,
exact h1.some_spec.2,
end }
end add_comm_group
@[priority 100]
instance divisible_by_int_of_char_zero {𝕜} [division_ring 𝕜] [char_zero 𝕜] : divisible_by 𝕜 ℤ :=
{ div := λ q n, q / n,
div_zero := λ q, by norm_num,
div_cancel := λ n q hn,
by rw [zsmul_eq_mul, (int.cast_commute n _).eq, div_mul_cancel q (int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn)] }
namespace group
variables (A : Type*) [group A]
/--
A group is `ℤ`-rootable if it is `ℕ`-rootable.
-/
@[to_additive add_group.divisible_by_int_of_divisible_by_nat
"An additive group is `ℤ`-divisible if it is `ℕ`-divisible."]
def rootable_by_int_of_rootable_by_nat [rootable_by A ℕ] : rootable_by A ℤ :=
{ root := λ a z, match z with
| (n : ℕ) := rootable_by.root a n
| -[1+n] := (rootable_by.root a (n + 1))⁻¹
end,
root_zero := λ a, rootable_by.root_zero a,
root_cancel := λ n a hn, begin
induction n,
{ change (rootable_by.root a _) ^ _ = a,
norm_num,
rw [rootable_by.root_cancel],
rw [int.of_nat_eq_coe] at hn,
exact_mod_cast hn, },
{ change ((rootable_by.root a _) ⁻¹)^_ = a,
norm_num,
rw [rootable_by.root_cancel],
norm_num, }
end}
/--A group is `ℕ`-rootable if it is `ℤ`-rootable
-/
@[to_additive add_group.divisible_by_nat_of_divisible_by_int
"An additive group is `ℕ`-divisible if it `ℤ`-divisible."]
def rootable_by_nat_of_rootable_by_int [rootable_by A ℤ] : rootable_by A ℕ :=
{ root := λ a n, rootable_by.root a (n : ℤ),
root_zero := λ a, rootable_by.root_zero a,
root_cancel := λ n a hn, begin
have := rootable_by.root_cancel a (show (n : ℤ) ≠ 0, by exact_mod_cast hn),
norm_num at this,
exact this,
end }
end group
section hom
variables {α A B : Type*}
variables [has_zero α] [monoid A] [monoid B] [has_pow A α] [has_pow B α] [rootable_by A α]
variables (f : A → B)
/--
If `f : A → B` is a surjective homomorphism and `A` is `α`-rootable, then `B` is also `α`-rootable.
-/
@[to_additive "If `f : A → B` is a surjective homomorphism and
`A` is `α`-divisible, then `B` is also `α`-divisible."]
noncomputable def function.surjective.rootable_by (hf : function.surjective f)
(hpow : ∀ (a : A) (n : α), f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n) : rootable_by B α :=
rootable_by_of_pow_left_surj _ _ $ λ n hn x,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x in ⟨f $ rootable_by.root y n, (by rw [←hpow (rootable_by.root y n) n,
rootable_by.root_cancel _ hn, hy] : _ ^ _ = x)⟩
@[to_additive divisible_by.surjective_smul]
lemma rootable_by.surjective_pow
(A α : Type*) [monoid A] [has_pow A α] [has_zero α] [rootable_by A α] {n : α} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
function.surjective (λ (a : A), a^n) :=
λ a, ⟨rootable_by.root a n, rootable_by.root_cancel a hn⟩
end hom
section quotient
variables (α : Type*) {A : Type*} [comm_group A] (B : subgroup A)
/-- Any quotient group of a rootable group is rootable. -/
@[to_additive quotient_add_group.divisible_by
"Any quotient group of a divisible group is divisible"]
noncomputable instance quotient_group.rootable_by [rootable_by A ℕ] : rootable_by (A ⧸ B) ℕ :=
quotient_group.mk_surjective.rootable_by _ $ λ _ _, rfl
end quotient
|
6a444eca761bcb09c39d32e8d32fa2f33e9af44d | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/algebra/free_algebra.lean | f29bc6e5d30719a35668b45857641766c43e0b80 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,417 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Adam Topaz
-/
import algebra.algebra.subalgebra.basic
import algebra.monoid_algebra.basic
/-!
# Free Algebras
Given a commutative semiring `R`, and a type `X`, we construct the free unital, associative
`R`-algebra on `X`.
## Notation
1. `free_algebra R X` is the free algebra itself. It is endowed with an `R`-algebra structure.
2. `free_algebra.ι R` is the function `X → free_algebra R X`.
3. Given a function `f : X → A` to an R-algebra `A`, `lift R f` is the lift of `f` to an
`R`-algebra morphism `free_algebra R X → A`.
## Theorems
1. `ι_comp_lift` states that the composition `(lift R f) ∘ (ι R)` is identical to `f`.
2. `lift_unique` states that whenever an R-algebra morphism `g : free_algebra R X → A` is
given whose composition with `ι R` is `f`, then one has `g = lift R f`.
3. `hom_ext` is a variant of `lift_unique` in the form of an extensionality theorem.
4. `lift_comp_ι` is a combination of `ι_comp_lift` and `lift_unique`. It states that the lift
of the composition of an algebra morphism with `ι` is the algebra morphism itself.
5. `equiv_monoid_algebra_free_monoid : free_algebra R X ≃ₐ[R] monoid_algebra R (free_monoid X)`
6. An inductive principle `induction`.
## Implementation details
We construct the free algebra on `X` as a quotient of an inductive type `free_algebra.pre` by an
inductively defined relation `free_algebra.rel`. Explicitly, the construction involves three steps:
1. We construct an inductive type `free_algebra.pre R X`, the terms of which should be thought
of as representatives for the elements of `free_algebra R X`.
It is the free type with maps from `R` and `X`, and with two binary operations `add` and `mul`.
2. We construct an inductive relation `free_algebra.rel R X` on `free_algebra.pre R X`.
This is the smallest relation for which the quotient is an `R`-algebra where addition resp.
multiplication are induced by `add` resp. `mul` from 1., and for which the map from `R` is the
structure map for the algebra.
3. The free algebra `free_algebra R X` is the quotient of `free_algebra.pre R X` by
the relation `free_algebra.rel R X`.
-/
variables (R : Type*) [comm_semiring R]
variables (X : Type*)
namespace free_algebra
/--
This inductive type is used to express representatives of the free algebra.
-/
inductive pre
| of : X → pre
| of_scalar : R → pre
| add : pre → pre → pre
| mul : pre → pre → pre
namespace pre
instance : inhabited (pre R X) := ⟨of_scalar 0⟩
-- Note: These instances are only used to simplify the notation.
/-- Coercion from `X` to `pre R X`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def has_coe_generator : has_coe X (pre R X) := ⟨of⟩
/-- Coercion from `R` to `pre R X`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def has_coe_semiring : has_coe R (pre R X) := ⟨of_scalar⟩
/-- Multiplication in `pre R X` defined as `pre.mul`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def has_mul : has_mul (pre R X) := ⟨mul⟩
/-- Addition in `pre R X` defined as `pre.add`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def has_add : has_add (pre R X) := ⟨add⟩
/-- Zero in `pre R X` defined as the image of `0` from `R`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def has_zero : has_zero (pre R X) := ⟨of_scalar 0⟩
/-- One in `pre R X` defined as the image of `1` from `R`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def has_one : has_one (pre R X) := ⟨of_scalar 1⟩
/--
Scalar multiplication defined as multiplication by the image of elements from `R`.
Note: Used for notation only.
-/
def has_scalar : has_scalar R (pre R X) := ⟨λ r m, mul (of_scalar r) m⟩
end pre
local attribute [instance]
pre.has_coe_generator pre.has_coe_semiring pre.has_mul pre.has_add pre.has_zero
pre.has_one pre.has_scalar
/--
Given a function from `X` to an `R`-algebra `A`, `lift_fun` provides a lift of `f` to a function
from `pre R X` to `A`. This is mainly used in the construction of `free_algebra.lift`.
-/
def lift_fun {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A] (f : X → A) : pre R X → A :=
λ t, pre.rec_on t f (algebra_map _ _) (λ _ _, (+)) (λ _ _, (*))
/--
An inductively defined relation on `pre R X` used to force the initial algebra structure on
the associated quotient.
-/
inductive rel : (pre R X) → (pre R X) → Prop
-- force `of_scalar` to be a central semiring morphism
| add_scalar {r s : R} : rel ↑(r + s) (↑r + ↑s)
| mul_scalar {r s : R} : rel ↑(r * s) (↑r * ↑s)
| central_scalar {r : R} {a : pre R X} : rel (r * a) (a * r)
-- commutative additive semigroup
| add_assoc {a b c : pre R X} : rel (a + b + c) (a + (b + c))
| add_comm {a b : pre R X} : rel (a + b) (b + a)
| zero_add {a : pre R X} : rel (0 + a) a
-- multiplicative monoid
| mul_assoc {a b c : pre R X} : rel (a * b * c) (a * (b * c))
| one_mul {a : pre R X} : rel (1 * a) a
| mul_one {a : pre R X} : rel (a * 1) a
-- distributivity
| left_distrib {a b c : pre R X} : rel (a * (b + c)) (a * b + a * c)
| right_distrib {a b c : pre R X} : rel ((a + b) * c) (a * c + b * c)
-- other relations needed for semiring
| zero_mul {a : pre R X} : rel (0 * a) 0
| mul_zero {a : pre R X} : rel (a * 0) 0
-- compatibility
| add_compat_left {a b c : pre R X} : rel a b → rel (a + c) (b + c)
| add_compat_right {a b c : pre R X} : rel a b → rel (c + a) (c + b)
| mul_compat_left {a b c : pre R X} : rel a b → rel (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_compat_right {a b c : pre R X} : rel a b → rel (c * a) (c * b)
end free_algebra
/--
The free algebra for the type `X` over the commutative semiring `R`.
-/
def free_algebra := quot (free_algebra.rel R X)
namespace free_algebra
local attribute [instance]
pre.has_coe_generator pre.has_coe_semiring pre.has_mul pre.has_add pre.has_zero
pre.has_one pre.has_scalar
instance : semiring (free_algebra R X) :=
{ add := quot.map₂ (+) (λ _ _ _, rel.add_compat_right) (λ _ _ _, rel.add_compat_left),
add_assoc := by { rintros ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.add_assoc },
zero := quot.mk _ 0,
zero_add := by { rintro ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.zero_add },
add_zero := begin
rintros ⟨⟩,
change quot.mk _ _ = _,
rw [quot.sound rel.add_comm, quot.sound rel.zero_add],
end,
add_comm := by { rintros ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.add_comm },
mul := quot.map₂ (*) (λ _ _ _, rel.mul_compat_right) (λ _ _ _, rel.mul_compat_left),
mul_assoc := by { rintros ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.mul_assoc },
one := quot.mk _ 1,
one_mul := by { rintros ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.one_mul },
mul_one := by { rintros ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.mul_one },
left_distrib := by { rintros ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.left_distrib },
right_distrib := by { rintros ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.right_distrib },
zero_mul := by { rintros ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.zero_mul },
mul_zero := by { rintros ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.mul_zero } }
instance : inhabited (free_algebra R X) := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_scalar R (free_algebra R X) :=
{ smul := λ r, quot.map ((*) ↑r) (λ a b, rel.mul_compat_right) }
instance : algebra R (free_algebra R X) :=
{ to_fun := λ r, quot.mk _ r,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ _ _, quot.sound rel.mul_scalar,
map_zero' := rfl,
map_add' := λ _ _, quot.sound rel.add_scalar,
commutes' := λ _, by { rintros ⟨⟩, exact quot.sound rel.central_scalar },
smul_def' := λ _ _, rfl }
instance {S : Type*} [comm_ring S] : ring (free_algebra S X) := algebra.semiring_to_ring S
variables {X}
/--
The canonical function `X → free_algebra R X`.
-/
def ι : X → free_algebra R X := λ m, quot.mk _ m
@[simp] lemma quot_mk_eq_ι (m : X) : quot.mk (free_algebra.rel R X) m = ι R m := rfl
variables {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A]
/-- Internal definition used to define `lift` -/
private def lift_aux (f : X → A) : (free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] A) :=
{ to_fun := λ a, quot.lift_on a (lift_fun _ _ f) $ λ a b h,
begin
induction h,
{ exact (algebra_map R A).map_add h_r h_s, },
{ exact (algebra_map R A).map_mul h_r h_s },
{ apply algebra.commutes },
{ change _ + _ + _ = _ + (_ + _),
rw add_assoc },
{ change _ + _ = _ + _,
rw add_comm, },
{ change (algebra_map _ _ _) + lift_fun R X f _ = lift_fun R X f _,
simp, },
{ change _ * _ * _ = _ * (_ * _),
rw mul_assoc },
{ change (algebra_map _ _ _) * lift_fun R X f _ = lift_fun R X f _,
simp, },
{ change lift_fun R X f _ * (algebra_map _ _ _) = lift_fun R X f _,
simp, },
{ change _ * (_ + _) = _ * _ + _ * _,
rw left_distrib, },
{ change (_ + _) * _ = _ * _ + _ * _,
rw right_distrib, },
{ change (algebra_map _ _ _) * _ = algebra_map _ _ _,
simp },
{ change _ * (algebra_map _ _ _) = algebra_map _ _ _,
simp },
repeat { change lift_fun R X f _ + lift_fun R X f _ = _,
rw h_ih,
refl, },
repeat { change lift_fun R X f _ * lift_fun R X f _ = _,
rw h_ih,
refl, },
end,
map_one' := by { change algebra_map _ _ _ = _, simp },
map_mul' := by { rintros ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩, refl },
map_zero' := by { change algebra_map _ _ _ = _, simp },
map_add' := by { rintros ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩, refl },
commutes' := by tauto }
/--
Given a function `f : X → A` where `A` is an `R`-algebra, `lift R f` is the unique lift
of `f` to a morphism of `R`-algebras `free_algebra R X → A`.
-/
def lift : (X → A) ≃ (free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] A) :=
{ to_fun := lift_aux R,
inv_fun := λ F, F ∘ (ι R),
left_inv := λ f, by {ext, refl},
right_inv := λ F, by
{ ext x,
rcases x,
induction x,
case pre.of :
{ change ((F : free_algebra R X → A) ∘ (ι R)) _ = _,
refl },
case pre.of_scalar :
{ change algebra_map _ _ x = F (algebra_map _ _ x),
rw alg_hom.commutes F x, },
case pre.add : a b ha hb
{ change lift_aux R (F ∘ ι R) (quot.mk _ _ + quot.mk _ _) = F (quot.mk _ _ + quot.mk _ _),
rw [alg_hom.map_add, alg_hom.map_add, ha, hb], },
case pre.mul : a b ha hb
{ change lift_aux R (F ∘ ι R) (quot.mk _ _ * quot.mk _ _) = F (quot.mk _ _ * quot.mk _ _),
rw [alg_hom.map_mul, alg_hom.map_mul, ha, hb], }, }, }
@[simp] lemma lift_aux_eq (f : X → A) : lift_aux R f = lift R f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma lift_symm_apply (F : free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] A) : (lift R).symm F = F ∘ (ι R) := rfl
variables {R X}
@[simp]
theorem ι_comp_lift (f : X → A) :
(lift R f : free_algebra R X → A) ∘ (ι R) = f := by {ext, refl}
@[simp]
theorem lift_ι_apply (f : X → A) (x) :
lift R f (ι R x) = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_unique (f : X → A) (g : free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] A) :
(g : free_algebra R X → A) ∘ (ι R) = f ↔ g = lift R f :=
(lift R).symm_apply_eq
/-!
At this stage we set the basic definitions as `@[irreducible]`, so from this point onwards one
should only use the universal properties of the free algebra, and consider the actual implementation
as a quotient of an inductive type as completely hidden.
Of course, one still has the option to locally make these definitions `semireducible` if so desired,
and Lean is still willing in some circumstances to do unification based on the underlying
definition.
-/
attribute [irreducible] ι lift
-- Marking `free_algebra` irreducible makes `ring` instances inaccessible on quotients.
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/algebra.2Esemiring_to_ring.20breaks.20semimodule.20typeclass.20lookup/near/212580241
-- For now, we avoid this by not marking it irreducible.
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_ι (g : free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] A) :
lift R ((g : free_algebra R X → A) ∘ (ι R)) = g :=
by { rw ←lift_symm_apply, exact (lift R).apply_symm_apply g }
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {f g : free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] A}
(w : ((f : free_algebra R X → A) ∘ (ι R)) = ((g : free_algebra R X → A) ∘ (ι R))) : f = g :=
begin
rw [←lift_symm_apply, ←lift_symm_apply] at w,
exact (lift R).symm.injective w,
end
/--
The free algebra on `X` is "just" the monoid algebra on the free monoid on `X`.
This would be useful when constructing linear maps out of a free algebra,
for example.
-/
noncomputable
def equiv_monoid_algebra_free_monoid : free_algebra R X ≃ₐ[R] monoid_algebra R (free_monoid X) :=
alg_equiv.of_alg_hom
(lift R (λ x, (monoid_algebra.of R (free_monoid X)) (free_monoid.of x)))
((monoid_algebra.lift R (free_monoid X) (free_algebra R X)) (free_monoid.lift (ι R)))
begin
apply monoid_algebra.alg_hom_ext, intro x,
apply free_monoid.rec_on x,
{ simp, refl, },
{ intros x y ih, simp at ih, simp [ih], }
end
(by { ext, simp, })
instance [nontrivial R] : nontrivial (free_algebra R X) :=
equiv_monoid_algebra_free_monoid.surjective.nontrivial
section
open_locale classical
/-- The left-inverse of `algebra_map`. -/
def algebra_map_inv : free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] R :=
lift R (0 : X → R)
lemma algebra_map_left_inverse :
function.left_inverse algebra_map_inv (algebra_map R $ free_algebra R X) :=
λ x, by simp [algebra_map_inv]
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_inj (x y : R) :
algebra_map R (free_algebra R X) x = algebra_map R (free_algebra R X) y ↔ x = y :=
algebra_map_left_inverse.injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_eq_zero_iff (x : R) : algebra_map R (free_algebra R X) x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff (algebra_map _ _) algebra_map_left_inverse.injective
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_eq_one_iff (x : R) : algebra_map R (free_algebra R X) x = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
map_eq_one_iff (algebra_map _ _) algebra_map_left_inverse.injective
-- this proof is copied from the approach in `free_abelian_group.of_injective`
lemma ι_injective [nontrivial R] : function.injective (ι R : X → free_algebra R X) :=
λ x y hoxy, classical.by_contradiction $ assume hxy : x ≠ y,
let f : free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] R := lift R (λ z, if x = z then (1 : R) else 0) in
have hfx1 : f (ι R x) = 1, from (lift_ι_apply _ _).trans $ if_pos rfl,
have hfy1 : f (ι R y) = 1, from hoxy ▸ hfx1,
have hfy0 : f (ι R y) = 0, from (lift_ι_apply _ _).trans $ if_neg hxy,
one_ne_zero $ hfy1.symm.trans hfy0
@[simp] lemma ι_inj [nontrivial R] (x y : X) : ι R x = ι R y ↔ x = y :=
ι_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma ι_ne_algebra_map [nontrivial R] (x : X) (r : R) : ι R x ≠ algebra_map R _ r :=
λ h,
let f0 : free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] R := lift R 0 in
let f1 : free_algebra R X →ₐ[R] R := lift R 1 in
have hf0 : f0 (ι R x) = 0, from lift_ι_apply _ _,
have hf1 : f1 (ι R x) = 1, from lift_ι_apply _ _,
begin
rw [h, f0.commutes, algebra.id.map_eq_self] at hf0,
rw [h, f1.commutes, algebra.id.map_eq_self] at hf1,
exact zero_ne_one (hf0.symm.trans hf1),
end
@[simp] lemma ι_ne_zero [nontrivial R] (x : X) : ι R x ≠ 0 :=
ι_ne_algebra_map x 0
@[simp] lemma ι_ne_one [nontrivial R] (x : X) : ι R x ≠ 1 :=
ι_ne_algebra_map x 1
end
end free_algebra
/- There is something weird in the above namespace that breaks the typeclass resolution of
`has_coe_to_sort` below. Closing it and reopening it fixes it... -/
namespace free_algebra
/-- An induction principle for the free algebra.
If `C` holds for the `algebra_map` of `r : R` into `free_algebra R X`, the `ι` of `x : X`, and is
preserved under addition and muliplication, then it holds for all of `free_algebra R X`.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction {C : free_algebra R X → Prop}
(h_grade0 : ∀ r, C (algebra_map R (free_algebra R X) r))
(h_grade1 : ∀ x, C (ι R x))
(h_mul : ∀ a b, C a → C b → C (a * b))
(h_add : ∀ a b, C a → C b → C (a + b))
(a : free_algebra R X) :
C a :=
begin
-- the arguments are enough to construct a subalgebra, and a mapping into it from X
let s : subalgebra R (free_algebra R X) :=
{ carrier := C,
mul_mem' := h_mul,
add_mem' := h_add,
algebra_map_mem' := h_grade0, },
let of : X → s := subtype.coind (ι R) h_grade1,
-- the mapping through the subalgebra is the identity
have of_id : alg_hom.id R (free_algebra R X) = s.val.comp (lift R of),
{ ext,
simp [of, subtype.coind], },
-- finding a proof is finding an element of the subalgebra
convert subtype.prop (lift R of a),
simp [alg_hom.ext_iff] at of_id,
exact of_id a,
end
end free_algebra
|
f6ecdd2f389a71422547c4aa8b71c6cc3fc12bcf | 737dc4b96c97368cb66b925eeea3ab633ec3d702 | /src/Std/Data/HashMap.lean | 3b804738bfac6a3c34816b28ee25c36ba4b3643d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Bioye97/lean4 | 1ace34638efd9913dc5991443777b01a08983289 | bc3900cbb9adda83eed7e6affeaade7cfd07716d | refs/heads/master | 1,690,589,820,211 | 1,631,051,000,000 | 1,631,067,598,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,530 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Std.Data.AssocList
namespace Std
universe u v w
def HashMapBucket (α : Type u) (β : Type v) :=
{ b : Array (AssocList α β) // b.size > 0 }
def HashMapBucket.update {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (data : HashMapBucket α β) (i : USize) (d : AssocList α β) (h : i.toNat < data.val.size) : HashMapBucket α β :=
⟨ data.val.uset i d h,
by erw [Array.size_set]; exact data.property ⟩
structure HashMapImp (α : Type u) (β : Type v) where
size : Nat
buckets : HashMapBucket α β
private def numBucketsForCapacity (capacity : Nat) : Nat :=
-- a "load factor" of 0.75 is the usual standard for hash maps
capacity * 4 / 3
def mkHashMapImp {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (capacity := 0) : HashMapImp α β :=
let_fun nbuckets := numBucketsForCapacity capacity
let n := if nbuckets = 0 then 8 else nbuckets
{ size := 0,
buckets :=
⟨ mkArray n AssocList.nil,
by simp; cases nbuckets; decide; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ; done ⟩ }
namespace HashMapImp
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
def mkIdx {n : Nat} (h : n > 0) (u : USize) : { u : USize // u.toNat < n } :=
⟨u % n, USize.modn_lt _ h⟩
@[inline] def reinsertAux (hashFn : α → UInt64) (data : HashMapBucket α β) (a : α) (b : β) : HashMapBucket α β :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx data.property (hashFn a |>.toUSize)
data.update i (AssocList.cons a b (data.val.uget i h)) h
@[inline] def foldBucketsM {δ : Type w} {m : Type w → Type w} [Monad m] (data : HashMapBucket α β) (d : δ) (f : δ → α → β → m δ) : m δ :=
data.val.foldlM (init := d) fun d b => b.foldlM f d
@[inline] def foldBuckets {δ : Type w} (data : HashMapBucket α β) (d : δ) (f : δ → α → β → δ) : δ :=
Id.run $ foldBucketsM data d f
@[inline] def foldM {δ : Type w} {m : Type w → Type w} [Monad m] (f : δ → α → β → m δ) (d : δ) (h : HashMapImp α β) : m δ :=
foldBucketsM h.buckets d f
@[inline] def fold {δ : Type w} (f : δ → α → β → δ) (d : δ) (m : HashMapImp α β) : δ :=
foldBuckets m.buckets d f
@[inline] def forBucketsM {m : Type w → Type w} [Monad m] (data : HashMapBucket α β) (f : α → β → m PUnit) : m PUnit :=
data.val.forM fun b => b.forM f
@[inline] def forM {m : Type w → Type w} [Monad m] (f : α → β → m PUnit) (h : HashMapImp α β) : m PUnit :=
forBucketsM h.buckets f
def findEntry? [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : HashMapImp α β) (a : α) : Option (α × β) :=
match m with
| ⟨_, buckets⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.property (hash a |>.toUSize)
(buckets.val.uget i h).findEntry? a
def find? [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : HashMapImp α β) (a : α) : Option β :=
match m with
| ⟨_, buckets⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.property (hash a |>.toUSize)
(buckets.val.uget i h).find? a
def contains [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : HashMapImp α β) (a : α) : Bool :=
match m with
| ⟨_, buckets⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.property (hash a |>.toUSize)
(buckets.val.uget i h).contains a
-- TODO: remove `partial` by using well-founded recursion
partial def moveEntries [Hashable α] (i : Nat) (source : Array (AssocList α β)) (target : HashMapBucket α β) : HashMapBucket α β :=
if h : i < source.size then
let idx : Fin source.size := ⟨i, h⟩
let es : AssocList α β := source.get idx
-- We remove `es` from `source` to make sure we can reuse its memory cells when performing es.foldl
let source := source.set idx AssocList.nil
let target := es.foldl (reinsertAux hash) target
moveEntries (i+1) source target
else target
def expand [Hashable α] (size : Nat) (buckets : HashMapBucket α β) : HashMapImp α β :=
let nbuckets := buckets.val.size * 2
have : nbuckets > 0 := Nat.mul_pos buckets.property (by decide)
let new_buckets : HashMapBucket α β := ⟨mkArray nbuckets AssocList.nil, by simp; assumption⟩
{ size := size,
buckets := moveEntries 0 buckets.val new_buckets }
@[inline] def insert [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : HashMapImp α β) (a : α) (b : β) : HashMapImp α β × Bool :=
match m with
| ⟨size, buckets⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.property (hash a |>.toUSize)
let bkt := buckets.val.uget i h
if bkt.contains a then
(⟨size, buckets.update i (bkt.replace a b) h⟩, true)
else
let size' := size + 1
let buckets' := buckets.update i (AssocList.cons a b bkt) h
if numBucketsForCapacity size' ≤ buckets.val.size then
({ size := size', buckets := buckets' }, false)
else
(expand size' buckets', false)
def erase [BEq α] [Hashable α] (m : HashMapImp α β) (a : α) : HashMapImp α β :=
match m with
| ⟨ size, buckets ⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := mkIdx buckets.property (hash a |>.toUSize)
let bkt := buckets.val.uget i h
if bkt.contains a then ⟨size - 1, buckets.update i (bkt.erase a) h⟩
else m
inductive WellFormed [BEq α] [Hashable α] : HashMapImp α β → Prop where
| mkWff : ∀ n, WellFormed (mkHashMapImp n)
| insertWff : ∀ m a b, WellFormed m → WellFormed (insert m a b |>.1)
| eraseWff : ∀ m a, WellFormed m → WellFormed (erase m a)
end HashMapImp
def HashMap (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [BEq α] [Hashable α] :=
{ m : HashMapImp α β // m.WellFormed }
open Std.HashMapImp
def mkHashMap {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [BEq α] [Hashable α] (capacity := 0) : HashMap α β :=
⟨ mkHashMapImp capacity, WellFormed.mkWff capacity ⟩
namespace HashMap
instance [BEq α] [Hashable α] : Inhabited (HashMap α β) where
default := mkHashMap
instance [BEq α] [Hashable α] : EmptyCollection (HashMap α β) := ⟨mkHashMap⟩
@[inline] def empty [BEq α] [Hashable α] : HashMap α β :=
mkHashMap
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {_ : BEq α} {_ : Hashable α}
def insert (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) (b : β) : HashMap α β :=
match m with
| ⟨ m, hw ⟩ =>
match h:m.insert a b with
| (m', _) => ⟨ m', by have aux := WellFormed.insertWff m a b hw; rw [h] at aux; assumption ⟩
/-- Similar to `insert`, but also returns a Boolean flad indicating whether an existing entry has been replaced with `a -> b`. -/
def insert' (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) (b : β) : HashMap α β × Bool :=
match m with
| ⟨ m, hw ⟩ =>
match h:m.insert a b with
| (m', replaced) => (⟨ m', by have aux := WellFormed.insertWff m a b hw; rw [h] at aux; assumption ⟩, replaced)
@[inline] def erase (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) : HashMap α β :=
match m with
| ⟨ m, hw ⟩ => ⟨ m.erase a, WellFormed.eraseWff m a hw ⟩
@[inline] def findEntry? (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) : Option (α × β) :=
match m with
| ⟨ m, _ ⟩ => m.findEntry? a
@[inline] def find? (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) : Option β :=
match m with
| ⟨ m, _ ⟩ => m.find? a
@[inline] def findD (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) (b₀ : β) : β :=
(m.find? a).getD b₀
@[inline] def find! [Inhabited β] (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) : β :=
match m.find? a with
| some b => b
| none => panic! "key is not in the map"
@[inline] def getOp (self : HashMap α β) (idx : α) : Option β :=
self.find? idx
@[inline] def contains (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) : Bool :=
match m with
| ⟨ m, _ ⟩ => m.contains a
@[inline] def foldM {δ : Type w} {m : Type w → Type w} [Monad m] (f : δ → α → β → m δ) (init : δ) (h : HashMap α β) : m δ :=
match h with
| ⟨ h, _ ⟩ => h.foldM f init
@[inline] def fold {δ : Type w} (f : δ → α → β → δ) (init : δ) (m : HashMap α β) : δ :=
match m with
| ⟨ m, _ ⟩ => m.fold f init
@[inline] def forM {m : Type w → Type w} [Monad m] (f : α → β → m PUnit) (h : HashMap α β) : m PUnit :=
match h with
| ⟨ h, _ ⟩ => h.forM f
@[inline] def size (m : HashMap α β) : Nat :=
match m with
| ⟨ {size := sz, ..}, _ ⟩ => sz
@[inline] def isEmpty (m : HashMap α β) : Bool :=
m.size = 0
def toList (m : HashMap α β) : List (α × β) :=
m.fold (init := []) fun r k v => (k, v)::r
def toArray (m : HashMap α β) : Array (α × β) :=
m.fold (init := #[]) fun r k v => r.push (k, v)
def numBuckets (m : HashMap α β) : Nat :=
m.val.buckets.val.size
end HashMap
end Std
|
30c84381e902534ce6ad0ea3006abb4332415f14 | 43390109ab88557e6090f3245c47479c123ee500 | /src/xenalib/Keji_permutations_for_matrices.lean | fccc36ca50cfe83f336842d355a63170d74395d4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Ja1941/xena-UROP-2018 | 41f0956519f94d56b8bf6834a8d39473f4923200 | b111fb87f343cf79eca3b886f99ee15c1dd9884b | refs/heads/master | 1,662,355,955,139 | 1,590,577,325,000 | 1,590,577,325,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,862 | lean | import data.fintype data.set.finite data.equiv.basic xenalib.Ellen_Arlt_matrix_rings algebra.big_operators data.set.finite group_theory.coset algebra.group
import group_theory.perm
open fintype
instance (n:ℕ) :(group (equiv.perm (fin n))) :=
begin
apply_instance,
end
noncomputable instance bij_fintype {n : ℕ} : fintype {f : fin n→ fin n // function.bijective f} :=
set_fintype _
noncomputable instance equiv_perm_fin_finite {n:ℕ}: fintype (equiv.perm(fin n)):=
fintype.of_surjective (λ (f : {f : fin n → fin n // function.bijective f}), equiv.of_bijective f.2)
begin
unfold function.surjective,
simp,
intro b,
let f:{f : fin n → fin n // function.bijective f}:= ⟨ b.1,b.bijective⟩,
existsi f.1,
existsi f.2,
apply equiv.ext,
intro x,
rw equiv.of_bijective_to_fun,
refl
end
def e {n:ℕ} {R:Type} [comm_ring R] (σ : equiv.perm (fin n)) : R:= ((equiv.perm.sign σ : ℤ ): R)
theorem sig_eq_inv {n:ℕ} (π: equiv.perm (fin n)) : equiv.perm.sign(π ) = equiv.perm.sign(π.symm ) :=
begin
{rw[eq_comm],
show equiv.perm.sign (π⁻¹) = equiv.perm.sign π,
rw[ is_group_hom.inv equiv.perm.sign] ,
swap,
apply_instance,
have h1: ∀ i: units ℤ , i⁻¹ = i,
exact dec_trivial,
rw[h1],}
end
theorem e_eq_inv {n:ℕ} {R:Type} [comm_ring R] (π: equiv.perm (fin n)) : @e n R _ (π ) = @e n R _ (π.symm ) :=
begin
unfold e,
rw sig_eq_inv
end
theorem e_mul {n:ℕ} {R:Type} [comm_ring R] (σ π :equiv.perm (fin n)) : @e n R _ (σ * π )= (@e n R _ σ ) * @e n R _ π :=
begin
unfold e,
rw[← int.cast_mul, ← units.mul_coe, ← is_group_hom.mul equiv.perm.sign],
apply_instance
end
theorem e_swap {n:ℕ} {R:Type} [comm_ring R] {i j : fin n} (h : i ≠ j) : e (equiv.swap i j) = (-1 :R) :=
begin
unfold e,
rw[equiv.perm.sign_swap],
simp,
exact h
end |
bf952111095f5ebdd0982fe979310fc6dcbf697c | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/ind1.lean | bac42f8f8fa32c08cee5d07d2fa318c347e1bb7b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 170 | lean | inductive list (A : Type) : Type :=
| nil : list A
| cons : A → list A → list A
namespace list end list open list
check list.{1}
check cons.{1}
check list.rec.{1 1}
|
29737f349669d145b9dbf17c0b1cf458408b45cc | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /src/Std/Data/RBTree.lean | ef5cfde3d566731f604b304f57e74d70ebb756d1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,355 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Std.Data.RBMap
namespace Std
universe u v w
def RBTree (α : Type u) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : Type u :=
RBMap α Unit cmp
instance : Inhabited (RBTree α p) where
default := RBMap.empty
@[inline] def mkRBTree (α : Type u) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : RBTree α cmp :=
mkRBMap α Unit cmp
instance (α : Type u) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : EmptyCollection (RBTree α cmp) :=
⟨mkRBTree α cmp⟩
namespace RBTree
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {cmp : α → α → Ordering}
@[inline] def empty : RBTree α cmp :=
RBMap.empty
@[inline] def depth (f : Nat → Nat → Nat) (t : RBTree α cmp) : Nat :=
RBMap.depth f t
@[inline] def fold (f : β → α → β) (init : β) (t : RBTree α cmp) : β :=
RBMap.fold (fun r a _ => f r a) init t
@[inline] def revFold (f : β → α → β) (init : β) (t : RBTree α cmp) : β :=
RBMap.revFold (fun r a _ => f r a) init t
@[inline] def foldM {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m] (f : β → α → m β) (init : β) (t : RBTree α cmp) : m β :=
RBMap.foldM (fun r a _ => f r a) init t
@[inline] def forM {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m] (f : α → m PUnit) (t : RBTree α cmp) : m PUnit :=
t.foldM (fun _ a => f a) ⟨⟩
@[inline] protected def forIn [Monad m] (t : RBTree α cmp) (init : σ) (f : α → σ → m (ForInStep σ)) : m σ :=
t.val.forIn init (fun a _ acc => f a acc)
instance : ForIn m (RBTree α cmp) α where
forIn := RBTree.forIn
@[inline] def isEmpty (t : RBTree α cmp) : Bool :=
RBMap.isEmpty t
@[specialize] def toList (t : RBTree α cmp) : List α :=
t.revFold (fun as a => a::as) []
@[inline] protected def min (t : RBTree α cmp) : Option α :=
match RBMap.min t with
| some ⟨a, _⟩ => some a
| none => none
@[inline] protected def max (t : RBTree α cmp) : Option α :=
match RBMap.max t with
| some ⟨a, _⟩ => some a
| none => none
instance [Repr α] : Repr (RBTree α cmp) where
reprPrec t prec := Repr.addAppParen ("Std.rbtreeOf " ++ repr t.toList) prec
@[inline] def insert (t : RBTree α cmp) (a : α) : RBTree α cmp :=
RBMap.insert t a ()
@[inline] def erase (t : RBTree α cmp) (a : α) : RBTree α cmp :=
RBMap.erase t a
@[specialize] def ofList : List α → RBTree α cmp
| [] => mkRBTree ..
| x::xs => (ofList xs).insert x
@[inline] def find? (t : RBTree α cmp) (a : α) : Option α :=
match RBMap.findCore? t a with
| some ⟨a, _⟩ => some a
| none => none
@[inline] def contains (t : RBTree α cmp) (a : α) : Bool :=
(t.find? a).isSome
def fromList (l : List α) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : RBTree α cmp :=
l.foldl insert (mkRBTree α cmp)
@[inline] def all (t : RBTree α cmp) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
RBMap.all t (fun a _ => p a)
@[inline] def any (t : RBTree α cmp) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
RBMap.any t (fun a _ => p a)
def subset (t₁ t₂ : RBTree α cmp) : Bool :=
t₁.all fun a => (t₂.find? a).toBool
def seteq (t₁ t₂ : RBTree α cmp) : Bool :=
subset t₁ t₂ && subset t₂ t₁
end RBTree
def rbtreeOf {α : Type u} (l : List α) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : RBTree α cmp :=
RBTree.fromList l cmp
end Std
|
1de85a9ded0e2895bbeef1bffb8afb383d26a0cc | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/category_theory/monad/monadicity.lean | b96ecf8ae59983ad9a267963250a2e0bf20e5567 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,228 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.limits.preserves.shapes.equalizers
import category_theory.limits.shapes.reflexive
import category_theory.monad.coequalizer
import category_theory.monad.limits
/-!
# Monadicity theorems
We prove monadicity theorems which can establish a given functor is monadic. In particular, we
show three versions of Beck's monadicity theorem, and the reflexive (crude) monadicity theorem:
`G` is a monadic right adjoint if it has a right adjoint, and:
* `D` has, `G` preserves and reflects `G`-split coequalizers, see
`category_theory.monad.monadic_of_has_preserves_reflects_G_split_coequalizers`
* `G` creates `G`-split coequalizers, see
`category_theory.monad.monadic_of_creates_G_split_coequalizers`
(The converse of this is also shown, see
`category_theory.monad.creates_G_split_coequalizers_of_monadic`)
* `D` has and `G` preserves `G`-split coequalizers, and `G` reflects isomorphisms, see
`category_theory.monad.monadic_of_has_preserves_G_split_coequalizers_of_reflects_isomorphisms`
* `D` has and `G` preserves reflexive coequalizers, and `G` reflects isomorphisms, see
`category_theory.monad.monadic_of_has_preserves_reflexive_coequalizers_of_reflects_isomorphisms`
## Tags
Beck, monadicity, descent
## TODO
Dualise to show comonadicity theorems.
-/
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace category_theory
namespace monad
open limits
noncomputable theory
-- Hide the implementation details in this namespace.
namespace monadicity_internal
section
-- We use these parameters and notations to simplify the statements of internal constructions
-- here.
parameters {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂}
parameters [category.{v₁} C] [category.{v₁} D]
parameters {G : D ⥤ C} [is_right_adjoint G]
-- An unfortunate consequence of the local notation is that it is only recognised if there is an
-- extra space after the reference.
local notation `F` := left_adjoint G
local notation `adj` := adjunction.of_right_adjoint G
/--
The "main pair" for an algebra `(A, α)` is the pair of morphisms `(F α, ε_FA)`. It is always a
reflexive pair, and will be used to construct the left adjoint to the comparison functor and show it
is an equivalence.
-/
instance main_pair_reflexive (A : adj .to_monad.algebra) :
is_reflexive_pair (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A)) :=
begin
apply is_reflexive_pair.mk' (F .map (adj .unit.app _)) _ _,
{ rw [← F .map_comp, ← F .map_id],
exact congr_arg (λ _, F .map _) A.unit },
{ rw adj .left_triangle_components,
refl },
end
/--
The "main pair" for an algebra `(A, α)` is the pair of morphisms `(F α, ε_FA)`. It is always a
`G`-split pair, and will be used to construct the left adjoint to the comparison functor and show it
is an equivalence.
-/
instance main_pair_G_split (A : adj .to_monad.algebra) :
G.is_split_pair (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A)) :=
{ splittable := ⟨_, _, ⟨beck_split_coequalizer A⟩⟩ }
/-- The object function for the left adjoint to the comparison functor. -/
def comparison_left_adjoint_obj
(A : adj .to_monad.algebra) [has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app _)] : D :=
coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app _)
/--
We have a bijection of homsets which will be used to construct the left adjoint to the comparison
functor.
-/
@[simps]
def comparison_left_adjoint_hom_equiv (A : adj .to_monad.algebra) (B : D)
[has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))] :
(comparison_left_adjoint_obj A ⟶ B) ≃ (A ⟶ (comparison adj).obj B) :=
calc (comparison_left_adjoint_obj A ⟶ B) ≃ {f : F .obj A.A ⟶ B // _} :
cofork.is_colimit.hom_iso (colimit.is_colimit _) B
... ≃ {g : A.A ⟶ G.obj B // G.map (F .map g) ≫ G.map (adj .counit.app B) = A.a ≫ g} :
begin
refine (adj .hom_equiv _ _).subtype_equiv _,
intro f,
rw [← (adj .hom_equiv _ _).injective.eq_iff, adjunction.hom_equiv_naturality_left,
adj .hom_equiv_unit, adj .hom_equiv_unit, G.map_comp],
dsimp,
rw [adj .right_triangle_components_assoc, ← G.map_comp, F .map_comp, category.assoc,
adj .counit_naturality, adj .left_triangle_components_assoc],
apply eq_comm,
end
... ≃ (A ⟶ (comparison adj).obj B) :
{ to_fun := λ g, { f := _, h' := g.prop },
inv_fun := λ f, ⟨f.f, f.h⟩,
left_inv := λ g, begin ext, refl end,
right_inv := λ f, begin ext, refl end }
/--
Construct the adjunction to the comparison functor.
-/
def left_adjoint_comparison
[∀ (A : adj .to_monad.algebra), has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))] :
adj .to_monad.algebra ⥤ D :=
begin
refine @adjunction.left_adjoint_of_equiv _ _ _ _
(comparison adj) (λ A, comparison_left_adjoint_obj A) (λ A B, _) _,
{ apply comparison_left_adjoint_hom_equiv },
{ intros A B B' g h,
ext1,
dsimp [comparison_left_adjoint_hom_equiv],
rw [← adj .hom_equiv_naturality_right, category.assoc] },
end
/--
Provided we have the appropriate coequalizers, we have an adjunction to the comparison functor.
-/
@[simps counit]
def comparison_adjunction
[∀ (A : adj .to_monad.algebra), has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))] :
left_adjoint_comparison ⊣ comparison adj :=
adjunction.adjunction_of_equiv_left _ _
lemma comparison_adjunction_unit_f_aux
[∀ (A : adj .to_monad.algebra), has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))]
(A : adj .to_monad.algebra) :
(comparison_adjunction.unit.app A).f =
adj .hom_equiv A.A _ (coequalizer.π (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))) :=
congr_arg (adj .hom_equiv _ _) (category.comp_id _)
/--
This is a cofork which is helpful for establishing monadicity: the morphism from the Beck
coequalizer to this cofork is the unit for the adjunction on the comparison functor.
-/
@[simps X]
def unit_cofork (A : adj .to_monad.algebra)
[has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))] :
cofork (G.map (F .map A.a)) (G.map (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))) :=
cofork.of_π (G.map (coequalizer.π (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))))
begin
change _ = G.map _ ≫ _,
rw [← G.map_comp, coequalizer.condition, G.map_comp],
end
@[simp] lemma unit_cofork_π (A : adj .to_monad.algebra)
[has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))] :
(unit_cofork A).π = G.map (coequalizer.π (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))) := rfl
lemma comparison_adjunction_unit_f
[∀ (A : adj .to_monad.algebra), has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))]
(A : adj .to_monad.algebra) :
(comparison_adjunction.unit.app A).f =
(beck_coequalizer A).desc (unit_cofork A) :=
begin
apply limits.cofork.is_colimit.hom_ext (beck_coequalizer A),
rw [cofork.is_colimit.π_comp_desc],
dsimp only [beck_cofork_π, unit_cofork_π],
rw [comparison_adjunction_unit_f_aux, ← adj .hom_equiv_naturality_left A.a, coequalizer.condition,
adj .hom_equiv_naturality_right, adj .hom_equiv_unit, category.assoc],
apply adj .right_triangle_components_assoc,
end
/--
The cofork which describes the counit of the adjunction: the morphism from the coequalizer of
this pair to this morphism is the counit.
-/
@[simps]
def counit_cofork (B : D) :
cofork (F .map (G.map (adj .counit.app B))) (adj .counit.app (F .obj (G.obj B))) :=
cofork.of_π (adj .counit.app B) (adj .counit_naturality _)
/-- The unit cofork is a colimit provided `G` preserves it. -/
def unit_colimit_of_preserves_coequalizer
(A : adj .to_monad.algebra) [has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))]
[preserves_colimit (parallel_pair (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))) G] :
is_colimit (unit_cofork A) :=
is_colimit_of_has_coequalizer_of_preserves_colimit G _ _
/-- The counit cofork is a colimit provided `G` reflects it. -/
def counit_coequalizer_of_reflects_coequalizer (B : D)
[reflects_colimit (parallel_pair
(F .map (G.map (adj .counit.app B)))
(adj .counit.app (F .obj (G.obj B)))) G] :
is_colimit (counit_cofork B) :=
is_colimit_of_is_colimit_cofork_map G _ (beck_coequalizer ((comparison adj).obj B))
lemma comparison_adjunction_counit_app
[∀ (A : adj .to_monad.algebra), has_coequalizer (F .map A.a) (adj .counit.app (F .obj A.A))]
(B : D) :
comparison_adjunction.counit.app B = colimit.desc _ (counit_cofork B) :=
begin
apply coequalizer.hom_ext,
change coequalizer.π _ _ ≫ coequalizer.desc ((adj .hom_equiv _ B).symm (𝟙 _)) _ =
coequalizer.π _ _ ≫ coequalizer.desc _ _,
simp,
end
end
end monadicity_internal
open category_theory.adjunction
open monadicity_internal
variables {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂}
variables [category.{v₁} C] [category.{v₁} D]
variables (G : D ⥤ C)
/--
If `G` is monadic, it creates colimits of `G`-split pairs. This is the "boring" direction of Beck's
monadicity theorem, the converse is given in `monadic_of_creates_G_split_coequalizers`.
-/
def creates_G_split_coequalizers_of_monadic [monadic_right_adjoint G] ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B)
[G.is_split_pair f g] :
creates_colimit (parallel_pair f g) G :=
begin
apply monadic_creates_colimit_of_preserves_colimit _ _,
apply_instance,
{ apply preserves_colimit_of_iso_diagram _ (diagram_iso_parallel_pair.{v₁} _).symm,
dsimp,
apply_instance },
{ apply preserves_colimit_of_iso_diagram _ (diagram_iso_parallel_pair.{v₁} _).symm,
dsimp,
apply_instance }
end
variables [is_right_adjoint G]
section beck_monadicity
/--
To show `G` is a monadic right adjoint, we can show it preserves and reflects `G`-split
coequalizers, and `C` has them.
-/
def monadic_of_has_preserves_reflects_G_split_coequalizers
[∀ ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B) [G.is_split_pair f g], has_coequalizer f g]
[∀ ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B) [G.is_split_pair f g], preserves_colimit (parallel_pair f g) G]
[∀ ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B) [G.is_split_pair f g], reflects_colimit (parallel_pair f g) G] :
monadic_right_adjoint G :=
begin
let L : (adjunction.of_right_adjoint G).to_monad.algebra ⥤ D := left_adjoint_comparison,
letI i : is_right_adjoint (comparison (of_right_adjoint G)) :=
⟨_, comparison_adjunction⟩,
constructor,
let : Π (X : (of_right_adjoint G).to_monad.algebra),
is_iso ((of_right_adjoint (comparison (of_right_adjoint G))).unit.app X),
{ intro X,
apply is_iso_of_reflects_iso _ (monad.forget (of_right_adjoint G).to_monad),
{ change is_iso (comparison_adjunction.unit.app X).f,
rw comparison_adjunction_unit_f,
change
is_iso
(is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso
(beck_coequalizer X)
(unit_colimit_of_preserves_coequalizer X)).hom,
refine is_iso.of_iso (is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso _ _) } },
let : Π (Y : D),
is_iso ((of_right_adjoint (comparison (of_right_adjoint G))).counit.app Y),
{ intro Y,
change is_iso (comparison_adjunction.counit.app Y),
rw comparison_adjunction_counit_app,
change is_iso (is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso _ _).hom,
apply_instance,
apply counit_coequalizer_of_reflects_coequalizer _,
letI : G.is_split_pair
((left_adjoint G).map (G.map ((adjunction.of_right_adjoint G).counit.app Y)))
((adjunction.of_right_adjoint G).counit.app ((left_adjoint G).obj (G.obj Y))) :=
monadicity_internal.main_pair_G_split ((comparison (adjunction.of_right_adjoint G)).obj Y),
apply_instance },
exactI adjunction.is_right_adjoint_to_is_equivalence,
end
/--
Beck's monadicity theorem. If `G` has a right adjoint and creates coequalizers of `G`-split pairs,
then it is monadic.
This is the converse of `creates_G_split_of_monadic`.
-/
def monadic_of_creates_G_split_coequalizers
[∀ ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B) [G.is_split_pair f g], creates_colimit (parallel_pair f g) G] :
monadic_right_adjoint G :=
begin
letI : ∀ ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B) [G.is_split_pair f g], has_colimit (parallel_pair f g ⋙ G),
{ introsI A B f g i,
apply has_colimit_of_iso (diagram_iso_parallel_pair.{v₁} _),
change has_coequalizer (G.map f) (G.map g),
apply_instance },
apply monadic_of_has_preserves_reflects_G_split_coequalizers _,
{ apply_instance },
{ introsI A B f g i,
apply has_colimit_of_created (parallel_pair f g) G },
{ introsI A B f g i,
apply_instance },
{ introsI A B f g i,
apply_instance }
end
/--
An alternate version of Beck's monadicity theorem. If `G` reflects isomorphisms, preserves
coequalizers of `G`-split pairs and `C` has coequalizers of `G`-split pairs, then it is monadic.
-/
def monadic_of_has_preserves_G_split_coequalizers_of_reflects_isomorphisms
[reflects_isomorphisms G]
[∀ ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B) [G.is_split_pair f g], has_coequalizer f g]
[∀ ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B) [G.is_split_pair f g], preserves_colimit (parallel_pair f g) G] :
monadic_right_adjoint G :=
begin
apply monadic_of_has_preserves_reflects_G_split_coequalizers _,
{ apply_instance },
{ assumption },
{ assumption },
{ introsI A B f g i,
apply reflects_colimit_of_reflects_isomorphisms },
end
end beck_monadicity
section reflexive_monadicity
variables [has_reflexive_coequalizers D] [reflects_isomorphisms G]
variables [∀ ⦃A B⦄ (f g : A ⟶ B) [is_reflexive_pair f g], preserves_colimit (parallel_pair f g) G]
/--
Reflexive (crude) monadicity theorem. If `G` has a right adjoint, `D` has and `G` preserves
reflexive coequalizers and `G` reflects isomorphisms, then `G` is monadic.
-/
def monadic_of_has_preserves_reflexive_coequalizers_of_reflects_isomorphisms :
monadic_right_adjoint G :=
begin
let L : (adjunction.of_right_adjoint G).to_monad.algebra ⥤ D := left_adjoint_comparison,
letI i : is_right_adjoint (comparison (adjunction.of_right_adjoint G)) :=
⟨_, comparison_adjunction⟩,
constructor,
let : Π (X : (adjunction.of_right_adjoint G).to_monad.algebra),
is_iso ((adjunction.of_right_adjoint (comparison (adjunction.of_right_adjoint G))).unit.app X),
{ intro X,
apply is_iso_of_reflects_iso _ (monad.forget (adjunction.of_right_adjoint G).to_monad),
{ change is_iso (comparison_adjunction.unit.app X).f,
rw comparison_adjunction_unit_f,
change
is_iso
(is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso
(beck_coequalizer X)
(unit_colimit_of_preserves_coequalizer X)).hom,
apply is_iso.of_iso (is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso _ _) } },
let : Π (Y : D),
is_iso ((of_right_adjoint (comparison (adjunction.of_right_adjoint G))).counit.app Y),
{ intro Y,
change is_iso (comparison_adjunction.counit.app Y),
rw comparison_adjunction_counit_app,
change is_iso (is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso _ _).hom,
apply_instance,
apply counit_coequalizer_of_reflects_coequalizer _,
apply reflects_colimit_of_reflects_isomorphisms },
exactI adjunction.is_right_adjoint_to_is_equivalence,
end
end reflexive_monadicity
end monad
end category_theory
|
7c661d73fecce119d8fda55e316450dddcf769a4 | ee8cdbabf07f77e7be63a449b8483ce308d37218 | /lean/src/test/aime-1983-p3.lean | 427c507284bd7fd1a46f188458246325ae121ecc | [
"MIT",
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | zeta1999/miniF2F | 6d66c75d1c18152e224d07d5eed57624f731d4b7 | c1ba9629559c5273c92ec226894baa0c1ce27861 | refs/heads/main | 1,681,897,460,642 | 1,620,646,361,000 | 1,620,646,361,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 493 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 OpenAI. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kunhao Zheng
-/
import data.real.basic
import data.real.sqrt
import data.finset.basic
import algebra.big_operators.basic
open_locale big_operators
example (f : ℝ → ℝ) (h₀ : ∀ x, f x = ( x ^ 2 + ( 18 * x + 30 ) - 2 * real.sqrt ( x ^ 2 + ( 18 * x + 45 ) ) ) ) (h₁ : fintype (f⁻¹' {0})) : ∏ x in (f⁻¹' {0}).to_finset, x = 20 :=
begin
sorry
end
|
7cb1d54d8725001f57f69fb9ac74b78cb696ad16 | 1437b3495ef9020d5413178aa33c0a625f15f15f | /analysis/measure_theory/lebesgue_measure.lean | 6137b0de3445490a7e07214ad9de79dfa101a8ae | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jean002/mathlib | c66bbb2d9fdc9c03ae07f869acac7ddbfce67a30 | dc6c38a765799c99c4d9c8d5207d9e6c9e0e2cfd | refs/heads/master | 1,587,027,806,375 | 1,547,306,358,000 | 1,547,306,358,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,531 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Lebesgue measure on the real line
-/
import analysis.measure_theory.measure_space analysis.measure_theory.borel_space
noncomputable theory
open classical set lattice filter
open nnreal (of_real)
namespace measure_theory
/-- Length of an interval. This is the largest monotonic function which correctly
measures all intervals. -/
def lebesgue_length (s : set ℝ) : ennreal := ⨅a b (h : s ⊆ Ico a b), of_real (b - a)
@[simp] lemma lebesgue_length_empty : lebesgue_length ∅ = 0 :=
le_zero_iff_eq.1 $ infi_le_of_le 0 $ infi_le_of_le 0 $ by simp
@[simp] lemma lebesgue_length_Ico (a b : ℝ) :
lebesgue_length (Ico a b) = of_real (b - a) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (infi_le_of_le a $ infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ (by refl))
(le_infi $ λ a', le_infi $ λ b', le_infi $ λ h, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 _),
cases le_or_lt b a with ab ab,
{ rw nnreal.of_real_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 ab), simp },
cases (Ico_subset_Ico_iff ab).1 h with h₁ h₂,
exact nnreal.of_real_le_of_real (sub_le_sub h₂ h₁)
end
lemma lebesgue_length_mono {s₁ s₂ : set ℝ} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : lebesgue_length s₁ ≤ lebesgue_length s₂ :=
infi_le_infi $ λ a, infi_le_infi $ λ b, infi_le_infi2 $ λ h', ⟨subset.trans h h', le_refl _⟩
lemma lebesgue_length_eq_infi_Ioo (s) : lebesgue_length s = ⨅a b (h : s ⊆ Ioo a b), of_real (b - a) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm
(infi_le_infi $ λ a, infi_le_infi $ λ b, infi_le_infi2 $ λ h,
⟨subset.trans h Ioo_subset_Ico_self, le_refl _⟩) _,
refine le_infi (λ a, le_infi $ λ b, le_infi $ λ h, _),
refine ennreal.le_of_forall_epsilon_le (λ ε ε0 _, _),
refine infi_le_of_le (a - ε) (infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le_of_le
(subset.trans h $ Ico_subset_Ioo_left $ (sub_lt_self_iff _).2 ε0) _),
rw [← sub_add, ← ennreal.coe_add, ennreal.coe_le_coe],
apply le_trans nnreal.of_real_add_le _,
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma lebesgue_length_Ioo (a b : ℝ) :
lebesgue_length (Ioo a b) = of_real (b - a) :=
begin
rw ← lebesgue_length_Ico,
refine le_antisymm (lebesgue_length_mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self) _,
rw lebesgue_length_eq_infi_Ioo (Ioo a b),
refine (le_infi $ λ a', le_infi $ λ b', le_infi $ λ h, _),
cases le_or_lt b a with ab ab, {simp [ab]},
cases (Ioo_subset_Ioo_iff ab).1 h with h₁ h₂,
rw [lebesgue_length_Ico, ennreal.coe_le_coe],
exact nnreal.of_real_le_of_real (sub_le_sub h₂ h₁)
end
lemma lebesgue_length_eq_infi_Icc (s) : lebesgue_length s = ⨅a b (h : s ⊆ Icc a b), of_real (b - a) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _
(infi_le_infi $ λ a, infi_le_infi $ λ b, infi_le_infi2 $ λ h,
⟨subset.trans h Ico_subset_Icc_self, le_refl _⟩),
refine le_infi (λ a, le_infi $ λ b, le_infi $ λ h, _),
refine ennreal.le_of_forall_epsilon_le (λ ε ε0 _, _),
refine infi_le_of_le a (infi_le_of_le (b + ε) $ infi_le_of_le
(subset.trans h $ Icc_subset_Ico_right $ (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 ε0) _),
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_right_comm, ←ennreal.coe_add, ennreal.coe_le_coe],
apply le_trans nnreal.of_real_add_le,
simp
end
@[simp] lemma lebesgue_length_Icc (a b : ℝ) :
lebesgue_length (Icc a b) = of_real (b - a) :=
begin
rw ← lebesgue_length_Ico,
refine le_antisymm _ (lebesgue_length_mono Ico_subset_Icc_self),
rw lebesgue_length_eq_infi_Icc (Icc a b),
exact infi_le_of_le a (infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le_of_le (by refl) (by simp))
end
/-- The Lebesgue outer measure, as an outer measure of ℝ. -/
def lebesgue_outer : outer_measure ℝ :=
outer_measure.of_function lebesgue_length lebesgue_length_empty
lemma lebesgue_outer_le_length (s : set ℝ) : lebesgue_outer s ≤ lebesgue_length s :=
outer_measure.of_function_le _ _ _
lemma lebesgue_length_subadditive {a b : ℝ} {c d : ℕ → ℝ}
(ss : Icc a b ⊆ ⋃i, Ioo (c i) (d i)) :
(of_real (b - a) : ennreal) ≤ ∑ i, of_real (d i - c i) :=
begin
suffices : ∀ (s:finset ℕ) b
(cv : Icc a b ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s:set ℕ), Ioo (c i) (d i)),
(of_real (b - a) : ennreal) ≤ s.sum (λ i, of_real (d i - c i)),
{ rcases @compact_elim_finite_subcover_image _ _
_ (Icc a b) univ (λ i, Ioo (c i) (d i)) compact_Icc
(λ i _, is_open_Ioo) (by simpa using ss) with ⟨s, su, hf, hs⟩,
have e : (⋃ i ∈ (↑hf.to_finset:set ℕ),
Ioo (c i) (d i)) = (⋃ i ∈ s, Ioo (c i) (d i)), {simp [set.ext_iff]},
rw ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum,
refine le_trans _ (le_supr _ hf.to_finset),
exact this hf.to_finset _ (by simpa [e]) },
clear ss b,
refine λ s, finset.strong_induction_on s (λ s IH b cv, _),
cases le_total b a with ab ab,
{ rw nnreal.of_real_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 ab), simp },
have := cv ⟨ab, le_refl _⟩, simp at this,
rcases this with ⟨i, is, cb, bd⟩,
rw [← finset.insert_erase is] at cv ⊢,
rw [finset.coe_insert, bUnion_insert] at cv,
rw [finset.sum_insert (finset.not_mem_erase _ _)],
refine le_trans _ (add_le_add_left' (IH _ (finset.erase_ssubset is) (c i) _)),
{ rw [← ennreal.coe_add, ennreal.coe_le_coe],
refine le_trans (nnreal.of_real_le_of_real _) nnreal.of_real_add_le,
rw sub_add_sub_cancel,
exact sub_le_sub_right (le_of_lt bd) _ },
{ rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
refine (cv ⟨h₁, le_trans h₂ (le_of_lt cb)⟩).resolve_left
(mt and.left (not_lt_of_le h₂)) }
end
@[simp] lemma lebesgue_outer_Icc (a b : ℝ) :
lebesgue_outer (Icc a b) = of_real (b - a) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (by rw ← lebesgue_length_Icc; apply lebesgue_outer_le_length)
(le_infi $ λ f, le_infi $ λ hf,
ennreal.le_of_forall_epsilon_le $ λ ε ε0 h, _),
rcases ennreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable
(ennreal.zero_lt_coe_iff.2 ε0) ℕ with ⟨ε', ε'0, hε⟩,
refine le_trans _ (add_le_add_left' (le_of_lt hε)),
rw ← ennreal.tsum_add,
choose g hg using show
∀ i, ∃ p:ℝ×ℝ, f i ⊆ Ioo p.1 p.2 ∧ (of_real (p.2 - p.1) : ennreal) < lebesgue_length (f i) + ε' i,
{ intro i,
have := (ennreal.lt_add_right (lt_of_le_of_lt (ennreal.le_tsum i) h)
(ennreal.zero_lt_coe_iff.2 (ε'0 i))),
conv at this {to_lhs, rw lebesgue_length_eq_infi_Ioo},
simpa [infi_lt_iff] },
refine le_trans _ (ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ i, le_of_lt (hg i).2),
exact lebesgue_length_subadditive (subset.trans hf $
Union_subset_Union $ λ i, (hg i).1)
end
@[simp] lemma lebesgue_outer_singleton (a : ℝ) : lebesgue_outer {a} = 0 :=
by simpa using lebesgue_outer_Icc a a
@[simp] lemma lebesgue_outer_Ico (a b : ℝ) :
lebesgue_outer (Ico a b) = of_real (b - a) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (by rw ← lebesgue_length_Ico; apply lebesgue_outer_le_length)
(ennreal.le_of_forall_epsilon_le $ λ ε ε0 h, _),
have := @nnreal.of_real_add_le (b - a - ε) ε,
rw [← ennreal.coe_le_coe, ennreal.coe_add, sub_add_cancel, sub_right_comm,
← lebesgue_outer_Icc a (b-ε), nnreal.of_real_coe] at this,
exact le_trans this (add_le_add_right' $ lebesgue_outer.mono $
Icc_subset_Ico_right $ (sub_lt_self_iff _).2 ε0)
end
@[simp] lemma lebesgue_outer_Ioo (a b : ℝ) :
lebesgue_outer (Ioo a b) = of_real (b - a) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (by rw ← lebesgue_length_Ioo; apply lebesgue_outer_le_length)
(ennreal.le_of_forall_epsilon_le $ λ ε ε0 h, _),
have := @nnreal.of_real_add_le (b - a - ε) ε,
rw [← ennreal.coe_le_coe, ennreal.coe_add, sub_add_cancel, sub_sub,
← lebesgue_outer_Ico (a+ε) b, nnreal.of_real_coe] at this,
exact le_trans this (add_le_add_right' $ lebesgue_outer.mono $
Ico_subset_Ioo_left $ (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 ε0)
end
lemma is_lebesgue_measurable_Iio {c : ℝ} :
lebesgue_outer.caratheodory.is_measurable (Iio c) :=
outer_measure.caratheodory_is_measurable $ λ t,
le_infi $ λ a, le_infi $ λ b, le_infi $ λ h, begin
refine le_trans (add_le_add'
(lebesgue_length_mono $ inter_subset_inter_left _ h)
(lebesgue_length_mono $ diff_subset_diff_left h)) _,
cases le_total a c with hac hca; cases le_total b c with hbc hcb;
simp [*, -sub_eq_add_neg, sub_add_sub_cancel'];
rw [← ennreal.coe_add, ennreal.coe_le_coe],
{ simp [*, -nnreal.of_real_add, nnreal.of_real_add_of_real,
-sub_eq_add_neg, sub_add_sub_cancel'] },
{ rw nnreal.of_real_of_nonpos,
{ simp },
exact sub_nonpos.2 (le_trans hbc hca) }
end
theorem lebesgue_outer_trim : lebesgue_outer.trim = lebesgue_outer :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (λ s, _) (outer_measure.trim_ge _),
rw outer_measure.trim_eq_infi,
refine le_infi (λ f, le_infi $ λ hf,
ennreal.le_of_forall_epsilon_le $ λ ε ε0 h, _),
rcases ennreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable
(ennreal.zero_lt_coe_iff.2 ε0) ℕ with ⟨ε', ε'0, hε⟩,
refine le_trans _ (add_le_add_left' (le_of_lt hε)),
rw ← ennreal.tsum_add,
choose g hg using show
∀ i, ∃ s, f i ⊆ s ∧ is_measurable s ∧ lebesgue_outer s ≤ lebesgue_length (f i) + of_real (ε' i),
{ intro i,
have := (ennreal.lt_add_right (lt_of_le_of_lt (ennreal.le_tsum i) h)
(ennreal.zero_lt_coe_iff.2 (ε'0 i))),
conv at this {to_lhs, rw lebesgue_length},
simp only [infi_lt_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨a, b, h₁, h₂⟩,
rw ← lebesgue_outer_Ico at h₂,
exact ⟨_, h₁, is_measurable_Ico, le_of_lt $ by simpa using h₂⟩ },
simp at hg,
apply infi_le_of_le (Union g) _,
apply infi_le_of_le (subset.trans hf $ Union_subset_Union (λ i, (hg i).1)) _,
apply infi_le_of_le (is_measurable.Union (λ i, (hg i).2.1)) _,
exact le_trans (lebesgue_outer.Union _) (ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ i, (hg i).2.2)
end
/-- Lebesgue measure on the Borel sets
The outer Lebesgue measure is the completion of this measure. (TODO: proof this)
-/
instance : measure_space ℝ :=
⟨{to_outer_measure := lebesgue_outer,
m_Union :=
have borel ℝ ≤ lebesgue_outer.caratheodory,
by rw real.borel_eq_generate_from_Iio_rat;
refine measurable_space.generate_from_le _;
simp [is_lebesgue_measurable_Iio] {contextual := tt},
λ f hf, lebesgue_outer.Union_eq_of_caratheodory (λ i, this _ (hf i)),
trimmed := lebesgue_outer_trim }⟩
@[simp] theorem lebesgue_to_outer_measure :
(measure_space.μ : measure ℝ).to_outer_measure = lebesgue_outer := rfl
theorem real.volume_val (s) : volume s = lebesgue_outer s := rfl
local attribute [simp] real.volume_val
@[simp] lemma real.volume_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ico a b) = of_real (b - a) := by simp
@[simp] lemma real.volume_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = of_real (b - a) := by simp
@[simp] lemma real.volume_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioo a b) = of_real (b - a) := by simp
@[simp] lemma real.volume_singleton {a : ℝ} : volume ({a} : set ℝ) = 0 := by simp
/-
section vitali
def vitali_aux_h (x : ℝ) (h : x ∈ Icc (0:ℝ) 1) :
∃ y ∈ Icc (0:ℝ) 1, ∃ q:ℚ, ↑q = x - y :=
⟨x, h, 0, by simp⟩
def vitali_aux (x : ℝ) (h : x ∈ Icc (0:ℝ) 1) : ℝ :=
classical.some (vitali_aux_h x h)
theorem vitali_aux_mem (x : ℝ) (h : x ∈ Icc (0:ℝ) 1) : vitali_aux x h ∈ Icc (0:ℝ) 1 :=
Exists.fst (classical.some_spec (vitali_aux_h x h):_)
theorem vitali_aux_rel (x : ℝ) (h : x ∈ Icc (0:ℝ) 1) :
∃ q:ℚ, ↑q = x - vitali_aux x h :=
Exists.snd (classical.some_spec (vitali_aux_h x h):_)
def vitali : set ℝ := {x | ∃ h, x = vitali_aux x h}
theorem vitali_nonmeasurable : ¬ is_null_measurable measure_space.μ vitali :=
sorry
end vitali
-/
end measure_theory
|
81493b4186a1da7f54eed534d40528a60fc81ba0 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/tools/debugger/cli_auto.lean | c4727f16a68185d118c69f43b441f40ff695ab40 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 731 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
Simple command line interface for debugging Lean programs and tactics.
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.tools.debugger.util
universes l
namespace Mathlib
namespace debugger
inductive mode where
| init : mode
| step : mode
| run : mode
| done : mode
structure state where
md : mode
csz : ℕ
fn_bps : List name
active_bps : List (ℕ × name)
def init_state : state := state.mk mode.init 0 [] []
def prune_active_bps_core (csz : ℕ) : List (ℕ × name) → List (ℕ × name) := sorry
end Mathlib |
b1ad6752d1fd6df8d5fb34545b7309b06520f5da | 958488bc7f3c2044206e0358e56d7690b6ae696c | /lean/implicit.lean | c5ab095b8fedfded8e6f0ed0b6839cc92966d4ec | [] | no_license | possientis/Prog | a08eec1c1b121c2fd6c70a8ae89e2fbef952adb4 | d4b3debc37610a88e0dac3ac5914903604fd1d1f | refs/heads/master | 1,692,263,717,723 | 1,691,757,179,000 | 1,691,757,179,000 | 40,361,602 | 3 | 0 | null | 1,679,896,438,000 | 1,438,953,859,000 | Coq | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 693 | lean | namespace hidden
variables {α : Type} (r : α → α → Prop)
definition reflexive : Prop := ∀ (a:α), r a a
--#check @reflexive
--#print reflexive
definition symmetric : Prop := ∀ {a b : α}, r a b → r b a
--#check @symmetric
--#print symmetric
definition transitive : Prop := ∀ {a b c : α}, r a b → r b c → r a c
--#check @transitive
--#print transitive
definition euclidean : Prop := ∀ {a b c : α}, r a b → r a c → r b c
--#check @euclidean
--#print euclidean
theorem T1 : reflexive r → euclidean r → symmetric r :=
assume R E a b, assume : r a b,
begin
apply E,
assumption,
begin apply R end,
end
--#check T1
end hidden
|
3e76b09c1cb58fc0b838606cd83a5102add470c1 | 271e26e338b0c14544a889c31c30b39c989f2e0f | /src/Init/Data/Int/Basic.lean | bd7677c6edeb99d82ecf5cca8b96a687f224279b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dgorokho/lean4 | 805f99b0b60c545b64ac34ab8237a8504f89d7d4 | e949a052bad59b1c7b54a82d24d516a656487d8a | refs/heads/master | 1,607,061,363,851 | 1,578,006,086,000 | 1,578,006,086,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,425 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
The integers, with addition, multiplication, and subtraction.
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.List
import Init.Coe
import Init.Data.Repr
import Init.Data.ToString
open Nat
/- the Type, coercions, and notation -/
inductive Int : Type
| ofNat : Nat → Int
| negSucc : Nat → Int
attribute [extern "lean_nat_to_int"] Int.ofNat
attribute [extern "lean_int_neg_succ_of_nat"] Int.negSucc
instance : HasCoe Nat Int := ⟨Int.ofNat⟩
namespace Int
protected def zero : Int := ofNat 0
protected def one : Int := ofNat 1
instance : HasZero Int := ⟨Int.zero⟩
instance : HasOne Int := ⟨Int.one⟩
def negOfNat : Nat → Int
| 0 => 0
| succ m => negSucc m
@[extern "lean_int_neg"]
protected def neg (n : @& Int) : Int :=
match n with
| ofNat n => negOfNat n
| negSucc n => succ n
def subNatNat (m n : Nat) : Int :=
match (n - m : Nat) with
| 0 => ofNat (m - n) -- m ≥ n
| (succ k) => negSucc k
@[extern "lean_int_add"]
protected def add (m n : @& Int) : Int :=
match m, n with
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m + n)
| ofNat m, negSucc n => subNatNat m (succ n)
| negSucc m, ofNat n => subNatNat n (succ m)
| negSucc m, negSucc n => negSucc (m + n)
@[extern "lean_int_mul"]
protected def mul (m n : @& Int) : Int :=
match m, n with
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m * n)
| ofNat m, negSucc n => negOfNat (m * succ n)
| negSucc m, ofNat n => negOfNat (succ m * n)
| negSucc m, negSucc n => ofNat (succ m * succ n)
instance : HasNeg Int := ⟨Int.neg⟩
instance : HasAdd Int := ⟨Int.add⟩
instance : HasMul Int := ⟨Int.mul⟩
@[extern "lean_int_sub"]
protected def sub (m n : @& Int) : Int :=
m + -n
instance : HasSub Int := ⟨Int.sub⟩
inductive NonNeg : Int → Prop
| mk (n : Nat) : NonNeg (ofNat n)
protected def LessEq (a b : Int) : Prop := NonNeg (b - a)
instance : HasLessEq Int := ⟨Int.LessEq⟩
protected def Less (a b : Int) : Prop := (a + 1) ≤ b
instance : HasLess Int := ⟨Int.Less⟩
@[extern "lean_int_dec_eq"]
protected def decEq (a b : @& Int) : Decidable (a = b) :=
match a, b with
| ofNat a, ofNat b => match decEq a b with
| isTrue h => isTrue $ h ▸ rfl
| isFalse h => isFalse $ fun h' => Int.noConfusion h' (fun h' => absurd h' h)
| negSucc a, negSucc b => match decEq a b with
| isTrue h => isTrue $ h ▸ rfl
| isFalse h => isFalse $ fun h' => Int.noConfusion h' (fun h' => absurd h' h)
| ofNat a, negSucc b => isFalse $ fun h => Int.noConfusion h
| negSucc a, ofNat b => isFalse $ fun h => Int.noConfusion h
instance Int.DecidableEq : DecidableEq Int :=
Int.decEq
@[extern "lean_int_dec_nonneg"]
private def decNonneg (m : @& Int) : Decidable (NonNeg m) :=
match m with
| ofNat m => isTrue $ NonNeg.mk m
| negSucc m => isFalse $ fun h => nomatch h
@[extern "lean_int_dec_le"]
instance decLe (a b : @& Int) : Decidable (a ≤ b) :=
decNonneg _
@[extern "lean_int_dec_lt"]
instance decLt (a b : @& Int) : Decidable (a < b) :=
decNonneg _
@[extern "lean_nat_abs"]
def natAbs (m : @& Int) : Nat :=
match m with
| ofNat m => m
| negSucc m => m.succ
protected def repr : Int → String
| ofNat m => Nat.repr m
| negSucc m => "-" ++ Nat.repr (succ m)
instance : HasRepr Int :=
⟨Int.repr⟩
instance : HasToString Int :=
⟨Int.repr⟩
instance : HasOfNat Int :=
⟨Int.ofNat⟩
@[extern "lean_int_div"]
def div : (@& Int) → (@& Int) → Int
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m / n)
| ofNat m, negSucc n => -ofNat (m / succ n)
| negSucc m, ofNat n => -ofNat (succ m / n)
| negSucc m, negSucc n => ofNat (succ m / succ n)
@[extern "lean_int_mod"]
def mod : (@& Int) → (@& Int) → Int
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m % n)
| ofNat m, negSucc n => ofNat (m % succ n)
| negSucc m, ofNat n => -ofNat (succ m % n)
| negSucc m, negSucc n => -ofNat (succ m % succ n)
instance : HasDiv Int := ⟨Int.div⟩
instance : HasMod Int := ⟨Int.mod⟩
def toNat : Int → Nat
| ofNat n => n
| negSucc n => 0
def natMod (m n : Int) : Nat := (m % n).toNat
end Int
namespace String
def toInt (s : String) : Int :=
if s.get 0 = '-' then
- Int.ofNat (s.toSubstring.drop 1).toNat
else
Int.ofNat s.toNat
def isInt (s : String) : Bool :=
if s.get 0 = '-' then
(s.toSubstring.drop 1).isNat
else
s.isNat
end String
|
2d84e2a1a96eb98a7f0bdb368e2778afa7809480 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/topology/algebra/affine.lean | 1ca07360d19ea848355b7c953f1e0bd2c8ef7c93 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,412 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import topology.algebra.continuous_functions
import linear_algebra.affine_space.affine_map
/-!
# Topological properties of affine spaces and maps
For now, this contains only a few facts regarding the continuity of affine maps in the special
case when the point space and vector space are the same.
-/
variables {R E F : Type*}
[ring R]
[add_comm_group E] [semimodule R E] [topological_space E]
[add_comm_group F] [semimodule R F] [topological_space F] [topological_add_group F]
namespace affine_map
/-
TODO: Deal with the case where the point spaces are different from the vector spaces.
-/
/-- An affine map is continuous iff its underlying linear map is continuous. -/
lemma continuous_iff {f : E →ᵃ[R] F} :
continuous f ↔ continuous f.linear :=
begin
split,
{ intro hc,
rw decomp' f,
have := hc.sub continuous_const,
exact this, },
{ intro hc,
rw decomp f,
have := hc.add continuous_const,
exact this }
end
/-- The line map is continuous. -/
lemma line_map_continuous [topological_space R] [topological_semimodule R F] {p v : F} :
continuous ⇑(line_map p v : R →ᵃ[R] F) :=
continuous_iff.mpr $ (continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add $
@continuous_const _ _ _ _ (0 : F)
end affine_map
|
0d191eff71dfd084eed1ec9d8da8855da8be0167 | ad0c7d243dc1bd563419e2767ed42fb323d7beea | /tactic/tidy.lean | 9fc0856279900e2a91e29cc5e90249d5b398373a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sebzim4500/mathlib | e0b5a63b1655f910dee30badf09bd7e191d3cf30 | 6997cafbd3a7325af5cb318561768c316ceb7757 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,549,958,618 | 1,538,221,723,000 | 1,538,221,723,000 | 150,869,076 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,538,229,323,000 | 1,538,229,323,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,812 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Scott Morrison
import tactic
import tactic.auto_cases
import tactic.chain
import tactic.interactive
namespace tactic
namespace tidy
meta def tidy_attribute : user_attribute := {
name := `tidy,
descr := "A tactic that should be called by `tidy`."
}
run_cmd attribute.register ``tidy_attribute
meta def name_to_tactic (n : name) : tactic (tactic string) :=
do d ← get_decl n,
e ← mk_const n,
let t := d.type,
if (t =ₐ `(tactic unit)) then
(eval_expr (tactic unit) e) >>= (λ t, pure (t >> pure n.to_string))
else if (t =ₐ `(tactic string)) then
(eval_expr (tactic string) e)
else fail "invalid type for @[tidy] tactic"
meta def run_tactics : tactic string :=
do names ← attribute.get_instances `tidy,
tactics ← names.mmap name_to_tactic,
first tactics <|> fail "no @[tidy] tactics succeeded"
meta def default_tactics : list (tactic string) :=
[ reflexivity >> pure "refl",
`[exact dec_trivial] >> pure "exact dec_trivial",
propositional_goal >> assumption >> pure "assumption",
`[ext1] >> pure "ext1",
intros1 >>= λ ns, pure ("intros " ++ (" ".intercalate (ns.map (λ e, e.to_string)))),
auto_cases,
`[apply_auto_param] >> pure "apply_auto_param",
`[dsimp at *] >> pure "dsimp at *",
`[simp at *] >> pure "simp at *",
fsplit >> pure "fsplit",
injections_and_clear >> pure "injections_and_clear",
propositional_goal >> (`[solve_by_elim]) >> pure "solve_by_elim",
`[unfold_aux] >> pure "unfold_aux",
tidy.run_tactics ]
meta structure cfg :=
(trace_result : bool := ff)
(trace_result_prefix : string := "/- `tidy` says -/ ")
(tactics : list (tactic string) := default_tactics)
declare_trace tidy
meta def core (cfg : cfg := {}) : tactic (list string) :=
do
results ← chain cfg.tactics,
when (cfg.trace_result ∨ is_trace_enabled_for `tidy) $
trace (cfg.trace_result_prefix ++ (", ".intercalate results)),
return results
end tidy
meta def tidy (cfg : tidy.cfg := {}) := tactic.tidy.core cfg >> skip
namespace interactive
meta def tidy (cfg : tidy.cfg := {}) := tactic.tidy cfg
end interactive
@[hole_command] meta def tidy_hole_cmd : hole_command :=
{ name := "tidy",
descr := "Use `tidy` to complete the goal.",
action := λ _, do script ← tidy.core, return [("begin " ++ (", ".intercalate script) ++ " end", "by tidy")] }
end tactic |
21c7fef352fead21324e34b12a4b10547f75e034 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/tactic/derive_inhabited.lean | c42dc5d3eff178076da8becb4d9ec6d14c1c45f0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,328 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-/
import logic.basic
/-!
# Derive handler for `inhabited` instances
This file introduces a derive handle to automatically generate `inhabited`
instances for structures and inductives. We also add various `inhabited`
instances for types in the core library.
-/
namespace tactic
/--
Tries to derive an `inhabited` instance for inductives and structures.
For example:
```
@[derive inhabited]
structure foo :=
(a : ℕ := 42)
(b : list ℕ)
```
Here, `@[derive inhabited]` adds the instance `foo.inhabited`, which is defined as
`⟨⟨42, default (list ℕ)⟩⟩`. For inductives, the default value is the first constructor.
If the structure/inductive has a type parameter `α`, then the generated instance will have an
argument `inhabited α`, even if it is not used. (This is due to the implementation using
`instance_derive_handler`.)
-/
@[derive_handler] meta def inhabited_instance : derive_handler :=
instance_derive_handler ``inhabited $ do
applyc ``inhabited.mk,
`[refine {..}] <|> (constructor >> skip),
all_goals' $ do
applyc ``default <|> (do s ← read,
fail $ to_fmt "could not find inhabited instance for:\n" ++ to_fmt s)
end tactic
attribute [derive inhabited]
vm_decl_kind vm_obj_kind
tactic.new_goals tactic.transparency tactic.apply_cfg
smt_pre_config ematch_config cc_config smt_config
rsimp.config
tactic.dunfold_config tactic.dsimp_config tactic.unfold_proj_config
tactic.simp_intros_config tactic.delta_config tactic.simp_config
tactic.rewrite_cfg
interactive.loc
tactic.unfold_config
param_info subsingleton_info fun_info
format.color
pos
environment.projection_info
reducibility_hints
congr_arg_kind
ulift
plift
string_imp string.iterator_imp
rbnode.color
ordering
unification_constraint pprod unification_hint
doc_category
tactic_doc_entry
instance {α} : inhabited (bin_tree α) := ⟨bin_tree.empty⟩
instance : inhabited unsigned := ⟨0⟩
instance : inhabited string.iterator := string.iterator_imp.inhabited
instance {α} : inhabited (rbnode α) := ⟨rbnode.leaf⟩
instance {α lt} : inhabited (rbtree α lt) := ⟨mk_rbtree _ _⟩
instance {α β lt} : inhabited (rbmap α β lt) := ⟨mk_rbmap _ _ _⟩
|
e51c5abb185e093d0abc3627f8e8388ef8f9b3a7 | e21db629d2e37a833531fdcb0b37ce4d71825408 | /src/mcl/lemmas.lean | 43b8b35b699ded8f1acce53d4eeec7747739d756 | [] | no_license | fischerman/GPU-transformation-verifier | 614a28cb4606a05a0eb27e8d4eab999f4f5ea60c | 75a5016f05382738ff93ce5859c4cfa47ccb63c1 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,985,789,300 | 1,579,290,514,000 | 1,579,290,514,000 | 165,031,073 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,197 | lean | import mcl.defs
import mcl.rhl
open parlang
open mcl
open mcl.rhl
open parlang.thread_state
@[simp]
lemma store_stores {sig : signature} {dim} {idx : vector (expression sig type.int) dim} {var t} {h₁ : type_of (sig.val var) = t} {h₂}
{ts : thread_state (memory $ parlang_mcl_tlocal sig) (parlang_mcl_shared sig)} {i : mcl_address sig} :
i ∉ (thread_state.tlocal_to_shared var idx h₁ h₂ ts).stores → i ∉ ts.stores := by simp [thread_state.tlocal_to_shared, store, not_or_distrib]
@[simp]
lemma store_loads {sig : signature} {dim} {idx : vector (expression sig type.int) dim} {var t} {h₁ : type_of (sig.val var) = t} {h₂}
{ts : thread_state (memory $ parlang_mcl_tlocal sig) (parlang_mcl_shared sig)} {i : mcl_address sig} :
i ∉ (thread_state.tlocal_to_shared var idx h₁ h₂ ts).loads → i ∉ ts.loads := by simp [thread_state.tlocal_to_shared, store, not_or_distrib]
@[simp]
lemma array_hole_name_neq {sig : signature} (var₁ var₂ : string) (h : var₁ ≠ var₂) (idx : vector ℕ (((sig.val var₁).type).dim)) :
(⟨var₁, idx⟩ : mcl_address sig) ∉ @array_address_range sig var₂ := begin
unfold array_address_range,
intro,
contradiction,
end |
76b52f359489f710415b0eef29034f415463b467 | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /tests/lean/defeq1.lean | 06b0fd634c95f3413f8acda367b36bb016d1be1b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 363 | lean | open nat tactic
universe variables u variables {A : Type u}
attribute [simp]
lemma succ_eq_add (n : nat) : succ n = n + 1 :=
rfl
example (n m : nat) (H : succ (succ n) = succ m) : true :=
by do H ← get_local `H,
t ← infer_type H,
s ← simp_lemmas.mk_default,
t' ← s^.dsimplify t,
trace t',
exact (expr.const `trivial [])
|
bf0a8eaa08827a5e0da2dee7eff3d9bad385729e | 6305b69bc7636a761e1a1947508bb5ebad93cb7e | /library/init/data/int/basic.lean | 839b8d5e47421f86563d4cf6b8a61fce56a74d75 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | HGldJ1966/lean | e7f0068f8a69fde3593b77d8a44609ae446d7738 | 049d940167c419cd5935d12b459c0695d8615ae9 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,340,395,700 | 1,503,103,829,000 | 1,503,103,829,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,956 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
The integers, with addition, multiplication, and subtraction.
-/
prelude
import init.data.nat.lemmas init.data.nat.gcd init.meta.transfer init.data.list
open nat
/- the type, coercions, and notation -/
inductive int : Type
| of_nat : nat → int
| neg_succ_of_nat : nat → int
notation `ℤ` := int
instance : has_coe nat int := ⟨int.of_nat⟩
notation `-[1+ ` n `]` := int.neg_succ_of_nat n
instance : decidable_eq int :=
by tactic.mk_dec_eq_instance
protected def int.repr : int → string
| (int.of_nat n) := repr n
| (int.neg_succ_of_nat n) := "-" ++ repr (succ n)
instance : has_repr int :=
⟨int.repr⟩
instance : has_to_string int :=
⟨int.repr⟩
namespace int
protected lemma coe_nat_eq (n : ℕ) : ↑n = int.of_nat n := rfl
protected def zero : ℤ := of_nat 0
protected def one : ℤ := of_nat 1
instance : has_zero ℤ := ⟨int.zero⟩
instance : has_one ℤ := ⟨int.one⟩
lemma of_nat_zero : of_nat (0 : nat) = (0 : int) := rfl
lemma of_nat_one : of_nat (1 : nat) = (1 : int) := rfl
/- definitions of basic functions -/
def neg_of_nat : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 := 0
| (succ m) := -[1+ m]
def sub_nat_nat (m n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
match (n - m : nat) with
| 0 := of_nat (m - n) -- m ≥ n
| (succ k) := -[1+ k] -- m < n, and n - m = succ k
end
protected def neg : ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat n) := neg_of_nat n
| -[1+ n] := succ n
protected def add : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := of_nat (m + n)
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := sub_nat_nat m (succ n)
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := sub_nat_nat n (succ m)
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := -[1+ succ (m + n)]
protected def mul : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := of_nat (m * n)
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := neg_of_nat (m * succ n)
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := neg_of_nat (succ m * n)
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := of_nat (succ m * succ n)
instance : has_neg ℤ := ⟨int.neg⟩
instance : has_add ℤ := ⟨int.add⟩
instance : has_mul ℤ := ⟨int.mul⟩
lemma of_nat_add (n m : ℕ) : of_nat (n + m) = of_nat n + of_nat m := rfl
lemma of_nat_mul (n m : ℕ) : of_nat (n * m) = of_nat n * of_nat m := rfl
lemma of_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : of_nat (succ n) = of_nat n + 1 := rfl
lemma neg_of_nat_zero : -(of_nat 0) = 0 := rfl
lemma neg_of_nat_of_succ (n : ℕ) : -(of_nat (succ n)) = -[1+ n] := rfl
lemma neg_neg_of_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : -(-[1+ n]) = of_nat (succ n) := rfl
lemma of_nat_eq_coe (n : ℕ) : of_nat n = ↑n := rfl
lemma neg_succ_of_nat_coe (n : ℕ) : -[1+ n] = -↑(n + 1) := rfl
protected lemma coe_nat_add (m n : ℕ) : (↑(m + n) : ℤ) = ↑m + ↑n := rfl
protected lemma coe_nat_mul (m n : ℕ) : (↑(m * n) : ℤ) = ↑m * ↑n := rfl
protected lemma coe_nat_zero : ↑(0 : ℕ) = (0 : ℤ) := rfl
protected lemma coe_nat_one : ↑(1 : ℕ) = (1 : ℤ) := rfl
protected lemma coe_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (↑(succ n) : ℤ) = ↑n + 1 := rfl
protected lemma coe_nat_add_out (m n : ℕ) : ↑m + ↑n = (m + n : ℤ) := rfl
protected lemma coe_nat_mul_out (m n : ℕ) : ↑m * ↑n = (↑(m * n) : ℤ) := rfl
protected lemma coe_nat_add_one_out (n : ℕ) : ↑n + (1 : ℤ) = ↑(succ n) := rfl
/- injectivity of the constructor functions -/
protected lemma of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} (h : of_nat m = of_nat n) : m = n :=
int.no_confusion h id
protected lemma coe_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} (h : (↑m : ℤ) = ↑n) : m = n :=
int.of_nat_inj h
lemma of_nat_eq_of_nat_iff (m n : ℕ) : of_nat m = of_nat n ↔ m = n :=
iff.intro int.of_nat_inj (congr_arg _)
protected lemma coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff (m n : ℕ) : (↑m : ℤ) = ↑n ↔ m = n :=
of_nat_eq_of_nat_iff m n
lemma neg_succ_of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} (h : neg_succ_of_nat m = neg_succ_of_nat n) : m = n :=
int.no_confusion h id
lemma neg_succ_of_nat_inj_iff {m n : ℕ} : neg_succ_of_nat m = neg_succ_of_nat n ↔ m = n :=
⟨neg_succ_of_nat_inj, assume H, by simp [H]⟩
lemma neg_succ_of_nat_eq (n : ℕ) : -[1+ n] = -(n + 1) := rfl
/- basic properties of sub_nat_nat -/
lemma sub_nat_nat_elim (m n : ℕ) (P : ℕ → ℕ → ℤ → Prop)
(hp : ∀i n, P (n + i) n (of_nat i))
(hn : ∀i m, P m (m + i + 1) (-[1+ i])) :
P m n (sub_nat_nat m n) :=
begin
have H : ∀k, n - m = k → P m n (nat.cases_on k (of_nat (m - n)) (λa, -[1+ a])),
{ intro k, cases k,
{ intro e,
cases (nat.le.dest (nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero e)) with k h,
rw [h.symm, nat.add_sub_cancel_left],
apply hp },
{ intro heq,
have h : m ≤ n,
{ exact nat.le_of_lt (nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ heq) },
rw [nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add h] at heq,
rw [heq, add_comm],
apply hn } },
exact H _ rfl
end
private lemma sub_nat_nat_add_left {m n : ℕ} :
sub_nat_nat (m + n) m = of_nat n :=
begin
dunfold sub_nat_nat,
rw [nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le],
dunfold sub_nat_nat._match_1,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
private lemma sub_nat_nat_add_right {m n : ℕ} :
sub_nat_nat m (m + n + 1) = neg_succ_of_nat n :=
calc sub_nat_nat._match_1 m (m + n + 1) (m + n + 1 - m) =
sub_nat_nat._match_1 m (m + n + 1) (m + (n + 1) - m) : by simp
... = sub_nat_nat._match_1 m (m + n + 1) (n + 1) : by rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
... = neg_succ_of_nat n : rfl
private lemma sub_nat_nat_add_add (m n k : ℕ) : sub_nat_nat (m + k) (n + k) = sub_nat_nat m n :=
sub_nat_nat_elim m n (λm n i, sub_nat_nat (m + k) (n + k) = i)
(assume i n, have n + i + k = (n + k) + i, by simp,
begin rw [this], exact sub_nat_nat_add_left end)
(assume i m, have m + i + 1 + k = (m + k) + i + 1, by simp,
begin rw [this], exact sub_nat_nat_add_right end)
/- nat_abs -/
def nat_abs : ℤ → ℕ
| (of_nat m) := m
| -[1+ m] := succ m
attribute [simp] nat_abs
lemma nat_abs_of_nat (n : ℕ) : nat_abs ↑n = n := rfl
lemma eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero : Π {a : ℤ}, nat_abs a = 0 → a = 0
| (of_nat m) H := congr_arg of_nat H
| -[1+ m'] H := absurd H (succ_ne_zero _)
lemma nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero {a : ℤ} (h : a ≠ 0) : nat_abs a > 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_left $ mt eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero h
lemma nat_abs_zero : nat_abs (0 : int) = (0 : nat) := rfl
lemma nat_abs_one : nat_abs (1 : int) = (1 : nat) := rfl
lemma nat_abs_mul_self : Π {a : ℤ}, ↑(nat_abs a * nat_abs a) = a * a
| (of_nat m) := rfl
| -[1+ m'] := rfl
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_neg (a : ℤ) : nat_abs (-a) = nat_abs a :=
by {cases a with n n, cases n; refl, refl}
lemma nat_abs_eq : Π (a : ℤ), a = nat_abs a ∨ a = -(nat_abs a)
| (of_nat m) := or.inl rfl
| -[1+ m'] := or.inr rfl
lemma eq_coe_or_neg (a : ℤ) : ∃n : ℕ, a = n ∨ a = -n := ⟨_, nat_abs_eq a⟩
/- sign -/
def sign : ℤ → ℤ
| (n+1:ℕ) := 1
| 0 := 0
| -[1+ n] := -1
@[simp] theorem sign_zero : sign 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_one : sign 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_neg_one : sign (-1) = -1 := rfl
/- Quotient and remainder -/
-- There are three main conventions for integer division,
-- referred here as the E, F, T rounding conventions.
-- All three pairs satisfy the identity x % y + (x / y) * y = x
-- unconditionally.
-- E-rounding: This pair satisfies 0 ≤ mod x y < nat_abs y for y ≠ 0
protected def div : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) := of_nat (m / n)
| (m : ℕ) -[1+ n] := -of_nat (m / succ n)
| -[1+ m] 0 := 0
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := -[1+ m / succ n]
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := of_nat (succ (m / succ n))
protected def mod : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (m : ℕ) n := (m % nat_abs n : ℕ)
| -[1+ m] n := sub_nat_nat (nat_abs n) (succ (m % nat_abs n))
-- F-rounding: This pair satisfies fdiv x y = floor (x / y)
def fdiv : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| 0 _ := 0
| (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) := of_nat (m / n)
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := -[1+ m / succ n]
| -[1+ m] 0 := 0
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := -[1+ m / succ n]
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := of_nat (succ m / succ n)
def fmod : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| 0 _ := 0
| (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) := of_nat (m % n)
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := sub_nat_nat (m % succ n) n
| -[1+ m] (n : ℕ) := sub_nat_nat n (succ (m % n))
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := -of_nat (succ m % succ n)
-- T-rounding: This pair satisfies quot x y = round_to_zero (x / y)
def quot : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := of_nat (m / n)
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := -of_nat (m / succ n)
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := -of_nat (succ m / n)
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := of_nat (succ m / succ n)
def rem : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := of_nat (m % n)
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := of_nat (m % succ n)
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := -of_nat (succ m % n)
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := -of_nat (succ m % succ n)
instance : has_div ℤ := ⟨int.div⟩
instance : has_mod ℤ := ⟨int.mod⟩
/- gcd -/
def gcd (m n : ℤ) : ℕ := gcd (nat_abs m) (nat_abs n)
/-- Relator between integers and pairs of natural numbers -/
inductive rel_int_nat_nat : ℤ → ℕ × ℕ → Prop
| pos : ∀{m p}, rel_int_nat_nat (of_nat p) (m + p, m)
| neg : ∀{m n}, rel_int_nat_nat (neg_succ_of_nat n) (m, m + n + 1)
protected lemma rel_sub_nat_nat {a b : ℕ} : rel_int_nat_nat (sub_nat_nat a b) (a, b) :=
sub_nat_nat_elim a b (λa b i, rel_int_nat_nat i (a, b))
(assume i n, rel_int_nat_nat.pos) (assume i n, rel_int_nat_nat.neg)
instance right_total_rel_int_nat_nat : relator.right_total rel_int_nat_nat
| (n, m) := ⟨_, int.rel_sub_nat_nat⟩
instance left_total_rel_int_nat_nat : relator.left_total rel_int_nat_nat
| (of_nat n) := ⟨(0 + n, 0), rel_int_nat_nat.pos⟩
| (neg_succ_of_nat n) := ⟨(0, 0 + n + 1), rel_int_nat_nat.neg⟩
instance bi_total_rel_int_nat_nat : relator.bi_total rel_int_nat_nat :=
⟨int.left_total_rel_int_nat_nat, int.right_total_rel_int_nat_nat⟩
protected lemma rel_neg_of_nat {m} : ∀{n}, rel_int_nat_nat (neg_of_nat n) (m, m + n)
| 0 := rel_int_nat_nat.pos
| (nat.succ n) := rel_int_nat_nat.neg
protected lemma rel_eq : (rel_int_nat_nat ⇒ (rel_int_nat_nat ⇒ iff))
eq (λa b, a.1 + b.2 = b.1 + a.2)
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m p) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m' p') :=
calc of_nat p = of_nat p'
↔ (m + m') + p = (m + m') + p' : by rw [of_nat_eq_of_nat_iff, add_left_cancel_iff]
... ↔ (m + p) + m' = (m' + p') + m : by simp
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m p) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m' n') :=
calc of_nat p = -[1+ n'] ↔ (m' + m) + (n' + p + 1) = (m' + m) + 0 :
begin rw [add_left_cancel_iff], apply iff.intro, repeat {intro, contradiction} end
... ↔ (m + p) + (m' + n' + 1) = m' + m : by simp
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m n) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m' p') :=
calc -[1+ n] = of_nat p' ↔ (m + m') + 0 = (m + m') + (n + p' + 1) :
begin rw [add_left_cancel_iff], apply iff.intro, repeat {intro, contradiction} end
... ↔ m + m' = m' + p' + (m + n + 1) : by simp
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m n) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m' n') :=
calc -[1+ n] = -[1+ n'] ↔ (m + m' + 1) + n' = (m + m' + 1) + n :
by rw [neg_succ_of_nat_inj_iff, add_left_cancel_iff, eq_comm]
... ↔ m + (m' + n' + 1) = m' + (m + n + 1) : by simp
/- should this be more general, i.e. ∀{n}, rel_int_nat_nat 0 (n, n) ? -/
protected lemma rel_zero : rel_int_nat_nat 0 (0, 0) :=
rel_int_nat_nat.pos
protected lemma rel_one : rel_int_nat_nat 1 (1, 0) :=
rel_int_nat_nat.pos
protected lemma rel_neg : (rel_int_nat_nat ⇒ rel_int_nat_nat) has_neg.neg (λa, (a.2, a.1))
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m p) := int.rel_neg_of_nat
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m n) := rel_int_nat_nat.pos
protected lemma rel_add : (rel_int_nat_nat ⇒ (rel_int_nat_nat ⇒ rel_int_nat_nat))
has_add.add (λa b, (a.1 + b.1, a.2 + b.2))
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m p) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m' p') :=
have eq : m + p + (m' + p') = m + m' + (p + p'),
by simp,
show rel_int_nat_nat (of_nat (p + p')) (m + p + (m' + p'), m + m'),
begin rw [eq], apply rel_int_nat_nat.pos end
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m p) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m' n') :=
have eq1 : m + p + m' = p + (m + m'),
by simp,
have eq2 : m + (m' + n' + 1) = (n' + 1) + (m + m'),
by simp,
show rel_int_nat_nat (sub_nat_nat p (n' + 1)) (m + p + m', m + (m' + n' + 1)),
begin
rw [eq1, eq2, (sub_nat_nat_add_add _ _ (m + m')).symm],
apply int.rel_sub_nat_nat
end
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m n) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m' p') :=
have eq1 : m + (m' + p') = p' + (m + m'),
by simp,
have eq2 : (m + n + 1) + m' = (n + 1) + (m + m'),
by simp,
show rel_int_nat_nat (sub_nat_nat p' (n + 1)) (m + (m' + p'), (m + n + 1) + m'),
begin
rw [eq1, eq2, (sub_nat_nat_add_add _ _ (m + m')).symm],
apply int.rel_sub_nat_nat
end
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m n) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m' n') :=
have eq : (m + n + 1) + (m' + n' + 1) = (m + m') + (n + n' + 1) + 1,
by simp,
show rel_int_nat_nat -[1+ (n + n' + 1)] (m + m', (m + n + 1) + (m' + n' + 1)),
begin rw [eq], apply rel_int_nat_nat.neg end
protected lemma rel_mul : (rel_int_nat_nat ⇒ (rel_int_nat_nat ⇒ rel_int_nat_nat))
has_mul.mul (λa b, (a.1 * b.1 + a.2 * b.2, a.1 * b.2 + a.2 * b.1))
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m p) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m' p') :=
have e : (m + p) * (m' + p') + m * m' = (m + p) * m' + m * (m' + p') + p * p',
by simp [mul_add, add_mul],
show rel_int_nat_nat (of_nat (p * p'))
((m + p) * (m' + p') + m * m', (m + p) * m' + m * (m' + p')),
begin rw [e], exact rel_int_nat_nat.pos end
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m p) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m' n') :=
have e : (m + p) * (m' + n' + 1) + m * m' = (m + p) * m' + m * (m' + n' + 1) + (p * (n' + 1)),
by simp [mul_add, add_mul],
show rel_int_nat_nat (of_nat p * -[1+ n'])
((m + p) * m' + m * (m' + n' + 1), (m + p) * (m' + n' + 1) + m * m'),
begin rw [e], exact int.rel_neg_of_nat end
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m n) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.pos m' p') :=
have e : m * m' + (m + n + 1) * (m' + p') = m * (m' + p') + (m + n + 1) * m' + ((n + 1) * p'),
by simp [mul_add, add_mul],
show rel_int_nat_nat (-[1+ n] * of_nat p')
(m * (m' + p') + (m + n + 1) * m', m * m' + (m + n + 1) * (m' + p')),
begin rw [e], exact int.rel_neg_of_nat end
| ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m n) ._ ._ (@rel_int_nat_nat.neg m' n') :=
have e : m * m' + (m + n + 1) * (m' + n' + 1) =
m * (m' + n' + 1) + (m + n + 1) * m' + ((n + 1) * (n' + 1)),
by simp [mul_add, add_mul],
show rel_int_nat_nat (-[1+ n] * -[1+ n'])
(m * m' + (m + n + 1) * (m' + n' + 1), m * (m' + n' + 1) + (m + n + 1) * m'),
begin rw [e], exact rel_int_nat_nat.pos end
/-
int is a ring
-/
protected meta def transfer_core : tactic unit := do
transfer.transfer [`relator.rel_forall_of_total, `relator.rel_not,
`int.rel_eq, `int.rel_zero, `int.rel_one,
`int.rel_add, `int.rel_neg, `int.rel_mul]
protected meta def transfer (distrib := tt) : tactic unit :=
if distrib then `[int.transfer_core, simp [add_mul, mul_add]]
else `[int.transfer_core, simp]
instance : comm_ring int :=
{ add := int.add,
add_assoc := by int.transfer,
zero := int.zero,
zero_add := by int.transfer,
add_zero := by int.transfer,
neg := int.neg,
add_left_neg := by int.transfer,
add_comm := by int.transfer,
mul := int.mul,
mul_assoc := by int.transfer tt,
one := int.one,
one_mul := by int.transfer,
mul_one := by int.transfer,
left_distrib := by int.transfer tt,
right_distrib := by int.transfer tt,
mul_comm := by int.transfer}
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance : has_sub int := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : add_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : add_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semiring int := by apply_instance
instance : semiring int := by apply_instance
instance : ring int := by apply_instance
instance : distrib int := by apply_instance
instance : zero_ne_one_class ℤ :=
{ zero := 0, one := 1, zero_ne_one := by int.transfer }
lemma of_nat_sub {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : of_nat (n - m) = of_nat n - of_nat m :=
show of_nat (n - m) = of_nat n + neg_of_nat m, from match m, h with
| 0, h := rfl
| succ m, h := show of_nat (n - succ m) = sub_nat_nat n (succ m),
by delta sub_nat_nat; rw sub_eq_zero_of_le h; refl
end
lemma neg_succ_of_nat_coe' (n : ℕ) : -[1+ n] = -↑n - 1 :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_add]; refl
protected lemma coe_nat_sub {n m : ℕ} : n ≤ m → (↑(m - n) : ℤ) = ↑m - ↑n := of_nat_sub
protected lemma sub_nat_nat_eq_coe {m n : ℕ} : sub_nat_nat m n = ↑m - ↑n :=
sub_nat_nat_elim m n (λm n i, i = ↑m - ↑n)
(λi n, by simp [int.coe_nat_add]; refl)
(λi n, by simp [int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_one, int.neg_succ_of_nat_eq];
apply congr_arg; rw[add_left_comm]; simp)
def to_nat : ℤ → ℕ
| (n : ℕ) := n
| -[1+ n] := 0
theorem to_nat_sub (m n : ℕ) : to_nat (m - n) = m - n :=
by rw [← int.sub_nat_nat_eq_coe]; exact sub_nat_nat_elim m n
(λm n i, to_nat i = m - n)
(λi n, by rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left]; refl)
(λi n, by rw [add_assoc, nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le (nat.le_add_right _ _)]; refl)
-- Since mod x y is always nonnegative when y ≠ 0, we can make a nat version of it
def nat_mod (m n : ℤ) : ℕ := (m % n).to_nat
theorem sign_mul_nat_abs : ∀ (a : ℤ), sign a * nat_abs a = a
| (n+1:ℕ) := one_mul _
| 0 := rfl
| -[1+ n] := (neg_eq_neg_one_mul _).symm
end int
|
7909b1618462cc19347e5c5171eb9ebb651dd5d8 | 302c785c90d40ad3d6be43d33bc6a558354cc2cf | /src/ring_theory/jacobson.lean | ef61effd14618f183d4fc9cba0566220ce5a2c5c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ilitzroth/mathlib | ea647e67f1fdfd19a0f7bdc5504e8acec6180011 | 5254ef14e3465f6504306132fe3ba9cec9ffff16 | refs/heads/master | 1,680,086,661,182 | 1,617,715,647,000 | 1,617,715,647,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 33,165 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Devon Tuma
-/
import data.mv_polynomial
import ring_theory.ideal.over
import ring_theory.jacobson_ideal
import ring_theory.localization
/-!
# Jacobson Rings
The following conditions are equivalent for a ring `R`:
1. Every radical ideal `I` is equal to its Jacobson radical
2. Every radical ideal `I` can be written as an intersection of maximal ideals
3. Every prime ideal `I` is equal to its Jacobson radical
Any ring satisfying any of these equivalent conditions is said to be Jacobson.
Some particular examples of Jacobson rings are also proven.
`is_jacobson_quotient` says that the quotient of a Jacobson ring is Jacobson.
`is_jacobson_localization` says the localization of a Jacobson ring to a single element is Jacobson.
`is_jacobson_polynomial_iff_is_jacobson` says polynomials over a Jacobson ring form a Jacobson ring.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring. Jacobson Rings are defined using the first of the above conditions
* `is_jacobson R` is the proposition that `R` is a Jacobson ring. It is a class,
implemented as the predicate that for any ideal, `I.radical = I` implies `I.jacobson = I`.
## Main statements
* `is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq` is the equivalence between conditions 1 and 3 above.
* `is_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal` is the equivalence between conditions 1 and 2 above.
* `is_jacobson_of_surjective` says that if `R` is a Jacobson ring and `f : R →+* S` is surjective,
then `S` is also a Jacobson ring
* `is_jacobson_mv_polynomial` says that multi-variate polynomials over a Jacobson ring are Jacobson.
## Tags
Jacobson, Jacobson Ring
-/
namespace ideal
open polynomial
section is_jacobson
variables {R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] {I : ideal R}
/-- A ring is a Jacobson ring if for every radical ideal `I`,
the Jacobson radical of `I` is equal to `I`.
See `is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq` and `is_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal` for equivalent definitions. -/
class is_jacobson (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] : Prop :=
(out' : ∀ (I : ideal R), I.radical = I → I.jacobson = I)
theorem is_jacobson_iff {R} [comm_ring R] :
is_jacobson R ↔ ∀ (I : ideal R), I.radical = I → I.jacobson = I :=
⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem is_jacobson.out {R} [comm_ring R] :
is_jacobson R → ∀ {I : ideal R}, I.radical = I → I.jacobson = I := is_jacobson_iff.1
/-- A ring is a Jacobson ring if and only if for all prime ideals `P`,
the Jacobson radical of `P` is equal to `P`. -/
lemma is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq : is_jacobson R ↔ ∀ P : ideal R, is_prime P → P.jacobson = P :=
begin
refine is_jacobson_iff.trans ⟨λ h I hI, h I (is_prime.radical hI), _⟩,
refine λ h I hI, le_antisymm (λ x hx, _) (λ x hx, mem_Inf.mpr (λ _ hJ, hJ.left hx)),
rw [← hI, radical_eq_Inf I, mem_Inf],
intros P hP,
rw set.mem_set_of_eq at hP,
erw mem_Inf at hx,
erw [← h P hP.right, mem_Inf],
exact λ J hJ, hx ⟨le_trans hP.left hJ.left, hJ.right⟩
end
/-- A ring `R` is Jacobson if and only if for every prime ideal `I`,
`I` can be written as the infimum of some collection of maximal ideals.
Allowing ⊤ in the set `M` of maximal ideals is equivalent, but makes some proofs cleaner. -/
lemma is_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal : is_jacobson R ↔
∀ {I : ideal R}, I.is_prime → ∃ M : set (ideal R), (∀ J ∈ M, is_maximal J ∨ J = ⊤) ∧ I = Inf M :=
⟨λ H I h, eq_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal.1 (H.out (is_prime.radical h)),
λ H, is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq.2 (λ P hP, eq_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal.2 (H hP))⟩
lemma is_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal' : is_jacobson R ↔
∀ {I : ideal R}, I.is_prime → ∃ M : set (ideal R),
(∀ (J ∈ M) (K : ideal R), J < K → K = ⊤) ∧ I = Inf M :=
⟨λ H I h, eq_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal'.1 (H.out (is_prime.radical h)),
λ H, is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq.2 (λ P hP, eq_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal'.2 (H hP))⟩
lemma radical_eq_jacobson [H : is_jacobson R] (I : ideal R) : I.radical = I.jacobson :=
le_antisymm (le_Inf (λ J ⟨hJ, hJ_max⟩, (is_prime.radical_le_iff hJ_max.is_prime).mpr hJ))
((H.out (radical_idem I)) ▸ (jacobson_mono le_radical))
/-- Fields have only two ideals, and the condition holds for both of them. -/
@[priority 100]
instance is_jacobson_field {K : Type*} [field K] : is_jacobson K :=
⟨λ I hI, or.rec_on (eq_bot_or_top I)
(λ h, le_antisymm
(Inf_le ⟨le_of_eq rfl, (eq.symm h) ▸ bot_is_maximal⟩)
((eq.symm h) ▸ bot_le))
(λ h, by rw [h, jacobson_eq_top_iff])⟩
theorem is_jacobson_of_surjective [H : is_jacobson R] :
(∃ (f : R →+* S), function.surjective f) → is_jacobson S :=
begin
rintros ⟨f, hf⟩,
rw is_jacobson_iff_Inf_maximal,
intros p hp,
use map f '' {J : ideal R | comap f p ≤ J ∧ J.is_maximal },
use λ j ⟨J, hJ, hmap⟩, hmap ▸ or.symm (map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective f hf hJ.right),
have : p = map f ((comap f p).jacobson),
from (is_jacobson.out' (comap f p) (by rw [← comap_radical, is_prime.radical hp])).symm
▸ (map_comap_of_surjective f hf p).symm,
exact eq.trans this (map_Inf hf (λ J ⟨hJ, _⟩, le_trans (ideal.ker_le_comap f) hJ)),
end
@[priority 100]
instance is_jacobson_quotient [is_jacobson R] : is_jacobson (quotient I) :=
is_jacobson_of_surjective ⟨quotient.mk I, (by rintro ⟨x⟩; use x; refl)⟩
lemma is_jacobson_iso (e : R ≃+* S) : is_jacobson R ↔ is_jacobson S :=
⟨λ h, @is_jacobson_of_surjective _ _ _ _ h ⟨(e : R →+* S), e.surjective⟩,
λ h, @is_jacobson_of_surjective _ _ _ _ h ⟨(e.symm : S →+* R), e.symm.surjective⟩⟩
lemma is_jacobson_of_is_integral [algebra R S] (hRS : algebra.is_integral R S)
(hR : is_jacobson R) : is_jacobson S :=
begin
rw is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq,
introsI P hP,
by_cases hP_top : comap (algebra_map R S) P = ⊤,
{ simp [comap_eq_top_iff.1 hP_top] },
{ haveI : nontrivial (comap (algebra_map R S) P).quotient := quotient.nontrivial hP_top,
rw jacobson_eq_iff_jacobson_quotient_eq_bot,
refine eq_bot_of_comap_eq_bot (is_integral_quotient_of_is_integral hRS) _,
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← jacobson_eq_iff_jacobson_quotient_eq_bot.1 ((is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq.1 hR)
(comap (algebra_map R S) P) (comap_is_prime _ _)), comap_jacobson],
refine Inf_le_Inf (λ J hJ, _),
simp only [true_and, set.mem_image, bot_le, set.mem_set_of_eq],
haveI : J.is_maximal := by simpa using hJ,
exact exists_ideal_over_maximal_of_is_integral (is_integral_quotient_of_is_integral hRS) J
(comap_bot_le_of_injective _ algebra_map_quotient_injective) }
end
lemma is_jacobson_of_is_integral' (f : R →+* S) (hf : f.is_integral)
(hR : is_jacobson R) : is_jacobson S :=
@is_jacobson_of_is_integral _ _ _ _ f.to_algebra hf hR
end is_jacobson
section localization
open localization_map submonoid
variables {R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] {I : ideal R}
variables {y : R} (f : away_map y S)
lemma disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem (hI : I.radical = I) :
disjoint ((submonoid.powers y) : set R) ↑I ↔ y ∉ I.1 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, set.disjoint_left.1 h (mem_powers _), λ h, (disjoint_iff).mpr (eq_bot_iff.mpr _)⟩,
rintros x ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, hx'⟩,
rw [← hI] at hx',
exact absurd (hI ▸ mem_radical_of_pow_mem hx' : y ∈ I.carrier) h
end
/-- If `R` is a Jacobson ring, then maximal ideals in the localization at `y`
correspond to maximal ideals in the original ring `R` that don't contain `y`.
This lemma gives the correspondence in the particular case of an ideal and its comap.
See `le_rel_iso_of_maximal` for the more general relation isomorphism -/
lemma is_maximal_iff_is_maximal_disjoint [H : is_jacobson R] (J : ideal S) :
J.is_maximal ↔ (comap f.to_map J).is_maximal ∧ y ∉ ideal.comap f.to_map J :=
begin
split,
{ refine λ h, ⟨_, λ hy, h.ne_top (ideal.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem _ hy
(map_units f ⟨y, submonoid.mem_powers _⟩))⟩,
have hJ : J.is_prime := is_maximal.is_prime h,
rw is_prime_iff_is_prime_disjoint f at hJ,
have : y ∉ (comap f.to_map J).1 :=
set.disjoint_left.1 hJ.right (submonoid.mem_powers _),
erw [← H.out (is_prime.radical hJ.left), mem_Inf] at this,
push_neg at this,
rcases this with ⟨I, hI, hI'⟩,
convert hI.right,
by_cases hJ : J = map f.to_map I,
{ rw [hJ, comap_map_of_is_prime_disjoint f I (is_maximal.is_prime hI.right)],
rwa disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem (is_maximal.is_prime hI.right).radical},
{ have hI_p : (map f.to_map I).is_prime,
{ refine is_prime_of_is_prime_disjoint f I hI.right.is_prime _,
rwa disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem (is_maximal.is_prime hI.right).radical },
have : J ≤ map f.to_map I := (map_comap f J) ▸ (map_mono hI.left),
exact absurd (h.1.2 _ (lt_of_le_of_ne this hJ)) hI_p.1 } },
{ refine λ h, ⟨⟨λ hJ, h.1.ne_top (eq_top_iff.2 _), λ I hI, _⟩⟩,
{ rwa [eq_top_iff, ← f.order_embedding.le_iff_le] at hJ },
{ have := congr_arg (map f.to_map) (h.1.1.2 _ ⟨comap_mono (le_of_lt hI), _⟩),
rwa [map_comap f I, map_top f.to_map] at this,
refine λ hI', hI.right _,
rw [← map_comap f I, ← map_comap f J],
exact map_mono hI' } }
end
/-- If `R` is a Jacobson ring, then maximal ideals in the localization at `y`
correspond to maximal ideals in the original ring `R` that don't contain `y`.
This lemma gives the correspondence in the particular case of an ideal and its map.
See `le_rel_iso_of_maximal` for the more general statement, and the reverse of this implication -/
lemma is_maximal_of_is_maximal_disjoint [is_jacobson R] (I : ideal R) (hI : I.is_maximal)
(hy : y ∉ I) : (map f.to_map I).is_maximal :=
begin
rw [is_maximal_iff_is_maximal_disjoint f,
comap_map_of_is_prime_disjoint f I (is_maximal.is_prime hI)
((disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem (is_maximal.is_prime hI).radical).2 hy)],
exact ⟨hI, hy⟩
end
/-- If `R` is a Jacobson ring, then maximal ideals in the localization at `y`
correspond to maximal ideals in the original ring `R` that don't contain `y` -/
def order_iso_of_maximal [is_jacobson R] :
{p : ideal S // p.is_maximal} ≃o {p : ideal R // p.is_maximal ∧ y ∉ p} :=
{ to_fun := λ p, ⟨ideal.comap f.to_map p.1, (is_maximal_iff_is_maximal_disjoint f p.1).1 p.2⟩,
inv_fun := λ p, ⟨ideal.map f.to_map p.1, is_maximal_of_is_maximal_disjoint f p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2⟩,
left_inv := λ J, subtype.eq (map_comap f J),
right_inv := λ I, subtype.eq (comap_map_of_is_prime_disjoint f I.1 (is_maximal.is_prime I.2.1)
((disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem I.2.1.is_prime.radical).2 I.2.2)),
map_rel_iff' := λ I I', ⟨λ h, (show I.val ≤ I'.val,
from (map_comap f I.val) ▸ (map_comap f I'.val) ▸ (ideal.map_mono h)), λ h x hx, h hx⟩ }
/-- If `S` is the localization of the Jacobson ring `R` at the submonoid generated by `y : R`, then
`S` is Jacobson. -/
lemma is_jacobson_localization [H : is_jacobson R]
(f : away_map y S) : is_jacobson S :=
begin
rw is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq,
refine λ P' hP', le_antisymm _ le_jacobson,
obtain ⟨hP', hPM⟩ := (localization_map.is_prime_iff_is_prime_disjoint f P').mp hP',
have hP := H.out (is_prime.radical hP'),
refine le_trans (le_trans (le_of_eq (localization_map.map_comap f P'.jacobson).symm) (map_mono _))
(le_of_eq (localization_map.map_comap f P')),
have : Inf { I : ideal R | comap f.to_map P' ≤ I ∧ I.is_maximal ∧ y ∉ I } ≤ comap f.to_map P',
{ intros x hx,
have hxy : x * y ∈ (comap f.to_map P').jacobson,
{ rw [ideal.jacobson, mem_Inf],
intros J hJ,
by_cases y ∈ J,
{ exact J.smul_mem x h },
{ exact (mul_comm y x) ▸ J.smul_mem y ((mem_Inf.1 hx) ⟨hJ.left, ⟨hJ.right, h⟩⟩) } },
rw hP at hxy,
cases hP'.mem_or_mem hxy with hxy hxy,
{ exact hxy },
{ exact (hPM ⟨submonoid.mem_powers _, hxy⟩).elim } },
refine le_trans _ this,
rw [ideal.jacobson, comap_Inf', Inf_eq_infi],
refine infi_le_infi_of_subset (λ I hI, ⟨map f.to_map I, ⟨_, _⟩⟩),
{ exact ⟨le_trans (le_of_eq ((localization_map.map_comap f P').symm)) (map_mono hI.1),
is_maximal_of_is_maximal_disjoint f _ hI.2.1 hI.2.2⟩ },
{ exact localization_map.comap_map_of_is_prime_disjoint f I (is_maximal.is_prime hI.2.1)
((disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem hI.2.1.is_prime.radical).2 hI.2.2) }
end
end localization
namespace polynomial
open polynomial
section comm_ring
variables {R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [integral_domain S]
variables {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [comm_ring Rₘ] [comm_ring Sₘ]
/-- If `I` is a prime ideal of `polynomial R` and `pX ∈ I` is a non-constant polynomial,
then the map `R →+* R[x]/I` descends to an integral map when localizing at `pX.leading_coeff`.
In particular `X` is integral because it satisfies `pX`, and constants are trivially integral,
so integrality of the entire extension follows by closure under addition and multiplication. -/
lemma is_integral_localization_map_polynomial_quotient
(P : ideal (polynomial R)) [P.is_prime] (pX : polynomial R) (hpX : pX ∈ P)
(ϕ : localization_map (submonoid.powers (pX.map (quotient.mk (P.comap C))).leading_coeff) Rₘ)
(ϕ' : localization_map ((submonoid.powers (pX.map (quotient.mk (P.comap C))).leading_coeff).map
(quotient_map P C le_rfl) : submonoid P.quotient) Sₘ) :
(ϕ.map ((submonoid.powers (pX.map (quotient.mk (P.comap C))).leading_coeff).mem_map_of_mem
(quotient_map P C le_rfl : (P.comap C : ideal R).quotient →* P.quotient)) ϕ').is_integral :=
begin
let P' : ideal R := P.comap C,
let M : submonoid P'.quotient :=
submonoid.powers (pX.map (quotient.mk (P.comap C))).leading_coeff,
let φ : P'.quotient →+* P.quotient := quotient_map P C le_rfl,
let φ' := (ϕ.map (M.mem_map_of_mem (φ : P'.quotient →* P.quotient)) ϕ'),
have hφ' : φ.comp (quotient.mk P') = (quotient.mk P).comp C := rfl,
intro p,
obtain ⟨⟨p', ⟨q, hq⟩⟩, hp⟩ := ϕ'.surj p,
suffices : φ'.is_integral_elem (ϕ'.to_map p'),
{ obtain ⟨q', hq', rfl⟩ := hq,
obtain ⟨q'', hq''⟩ := is_unit_iff_exists_inv'.1 (ϕ.map_units ⟨q', hq'⟩),
refine φ'.is_integral_of_is_integral_mul_unit p (ϕ'.to_map (φ q')) q'' _ (hp.symm ▸ this),
convert trans (trans (φ'.map_mul _ _).symm (congr_arg φ' hq'')) φ'.map_one using 2,
rw [← φ'.comp_apply, localization_map.map_comp, ϕ'.to_map.comp_apply, subtype.coe_mk] },
refine is_integral_of_mem_closure''
((ϕ'.to_map.comp (quotient.mk P)) '' (insert X {p | p.degree ≤ 0})) _ _ _,
{ rintros x ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩,
refine hp.rec_on (λ hy, _) (λ hy, _),
{ refine hy.symm ▸ (φ.is_integral_elem_localization_at_leading_coeff ((quotient.mk P) X)
(pX.map (quotient.mk P')) _ M ⟨1, pow_one _⟩ _ _),
rwa [eval₂_map, hφ', ← hom_eval₂, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, eval₂_C_X] },
{ rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, degree_le_zero_iff] at hy,
refine hy.symm ▸ ⟨X - C (ϕ.to_map ((quotient.mk P') (p.coeff 0))), monic_X_sub_C _, _⟩,
simp only [eval₂_sub, eval₂_C, eval₂_X],
rw [sub_eq_zero, ← φ'.comp_apply, localization_map.map_comp, ring_hom.comp_apply],
refl } },
{ obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective p',
refine polynomial.induction_on p
(λ r, subring.subset_closure $ set.mem_image_of_mem _ (or.inr degree_C_le))
(λ _ _ h1 h2, _) (λ n _ hr, _),
{ convert subring.add_mem _ h1 h2,
rw [ring_hom.map_add, ring_hom.map_add] },
{ rw [pow_succ X n, mul_comm X, ← mul_assoc, ring_hom.map_mul, ϕ'.to_map.map_mul],
exact subring.mul_mem _ hr (subring.subset_closure (set.mem_image_of_mem _ (or.inl rfl))) } },
end
/-- If `f : R → S` descends to an integral map in the localization at `x`,
and `R` is a Jacobson ring, then the intersection of all maximal ideals in `S` is trivial -/
lemma jacobson_bot_of_integral_localization {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] [is_jacobson R]
(φ : R →+* S) (hφ : function.injective φ) (x : R) (hx : x ≠ 0)
(ϕ : localization_map (submonoid.powers x) Rₘ)
(ϕ' : localization_map ((submonoid.powers x).map φ : submonoid S) Sₘ)
(hφ' : (ϕ.map ((submonoid.powers x).mem_map_of_mem (φ : R →* S)) ϕ').is_integral) :
(⊥ : ideal S).jacobson = ⊥ :=
begin
have hM : ((submonoid.powers x).map φ : submonoid S) ≤ non_zero_divisors S :=
map_le_non_zero_divisors_of_injective hφ (powers_le_non_zero_divisors_of_domain hx),
letI : integral_domain Sₘ := localization_map.integral_domain_of_le_non_zero_divisors ϕ' hM,
let φ' : Rₘ →+* Sₘ := ϕ.map ((submonoid.powers x).mem_map_of_mem (φ : R →* S)) ϕ',
suffices : ∀ I : ideal Sₘ, I.is_maximal → (I.comap ϕ'.to_map).is_maximal,
{ have hϕ' : comap ϕ'.to_map ⊥ = ⊥,
{ simpa [ring_hom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot, ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot] using ϕ'.injective hM },
refine eq_bot_iff.2 (le_trans _ (le_of_eq hϕ')),
have hSₘ : is_jacobson Sₘ := is_jacobson_of_is_integral' φ' hφ' (is_jacobson_localization ϕ),
rw [← hSₘ.out radical_bot_of_integral_domain, comap_jacobson],
exact Inf_le_Inf (λ j hj, ⟨bot_le, let ⟨J, hJ⟩ := hj in hJ.2 ▸ this J hJ.1.2⟩) },
introsI I hI,
-- Remainder of the proof is pulling and pushing ideals around the square and the quotient square
haveI : (I.comap ϕ'.to_map).is_prime := comap_is_prime ϕ'.to_map I,
haveI : (I.comap φ').is_prime := comap_is_prime φ' I,
haveI : (⊥ : ideal (I.comap ϕ'.to_map).quotient).is_prime := bot_prime,
have hcomm: φ'.comp ϕ.to_map = ϕ'.to_map.comp φ := ϕ.map_comp _,
let f := quotient_map (I.comap ϕ'.to_map) φ le_rfl,
let g := quotient_map I ϕ'.to_map le_rfl,
have := is_maximal_comap_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal' φ' hφ' I
(by convert hI; casesI _inst_4; refl),
have := ((is_maximal_iff_is_maximal_disjoint ϕ _).1 this).left,
have : ((I.comap ϕ'.to_map).comap φ).is_maximal,
{ rwa [comap_comap, hcomm, ← comap_comap] at this },
rw ← bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff at this ⊢,
refine is_maximal_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal_comap' f _ ⊥
((eq_bot_iff.2 (comap_bot_le_of_injective f quotient_map_injective)).symm ▸ this),
exact f.is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral g quotient_map_injective
((comp_quotient_map_eq_of_comp_eq hcomm I).symm ▸
(ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ _ (ring_hom.is_integral_of_surjective _
(localization_map.surjective_quotient_map_of_maximal_of_localization
(by rwa [comap_comap, hcomm, ← bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff])))
(ring_hom.is_integral_quotient_of_is_integral _ hφ'))),
end
/-- Used to bootstrap the proof of `is_jacobson_polynomial_iff_is_jacobson`.
That theorem is more general and should be used instead of this one. -/
private lemma is_jacobson_polynomial_of_domain (R : Type*) [integral_domain R] [hR : is_jacobson R]
(P : ideal (polynomial R)) [is_prime P] (hP : ∀ (x : R), C x ∈ P → x = 0) :
P.jacobson = P :=
begin
by_cases Pb : (P = ⊥),
{ exact Pb.symm ▸ jacobson_bot_polynomial_of_jacobson_bot
(hR.out radical_bot_of_integral_domain) },
{ refine jacobson_eq_iff_jacobson_quotient_eq_bot.mpr _,
haveI : (P.comap (C : R →+* polynomial R)).is_prime := comap_is_prime C P,
obtain ⟨p, pP, p0⟩ := exists_nonzero_mem_of_ne_bot Pb hP,
refine jacobson_bot_of_integral_localization (quotient_map P C le_rfl) quotient_map_injective
_ _ (localization.of (submonoid.powers (p.map (quotient.mk (P.comap C))).leading_coeff))
(localization.of _) (is_integral_localization_map_polynomial_quotient P _ pP _ _),
rwa [ne.def, leading_coeff_eq_zero] }
end
lemma is_jacobson_polynomial_of_is_jacobson (hR : is_jacobson R) :
is_jacobson (polynomial R) :=
begin
refine is_jacobson_iff_prime_eq.mpr (λ I, _),
introI hI,
let R' : subring I.quotient := ((quotient.mk I).comp C).range,
let i : R →+* R' := ((quotient.mk I).comp C).range_restrict,
have hi : function.surjective (i : R → R') := ((quotient.mk I).comp C).range_restrict_surjective,
have hi' : (polynomial.map_ring_hom i : polynomial R →+* polynomial R').ker ≤ I,
{ refine λ f hf, polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal I f (λ n, _),
replace hf := congr_arg (λ (g : polynomial (((quotient.mk I).comp C).range)), g.coeff n) hf,
change (polynomial.map ((quotient.mk I).comp C).range_restrict f).coeff n = 0 at hf,
rw [coeff_map, subtype.ext_iff] at hf,
rwa [mem_comap, ← quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ← ring_hom.comp_apply] },
haveI : (ideal.map (map_ring_hom i) I).is_prime :=
map_is_prime_of_surjective (map_surjective i hi) hi',
suffices : (I.map (polynomial.map_ring_hom i)).jacobson = (I.map (polynomial.map_ring_hom i)),
{ replace this := congr_arg (comap (polynomial.map_ring_hom i)) this,
rw [← map_jacobson_of_surjective _ hi',
comap_map_of_surjective _ _, comap_map_of_surjective _ _] at this,
refine le_antisymm (le_trans (le_sup_left_of_le le_rfl)
(le_trans (le_of_eq this) (sup_le le_rfl hi'))) le_jacobson,
all_goals {exact polynomial.map_surjective i hi} },
exact @is_jacobson_polynomial_of_domain R' _ (is_jacobson_of_surjective ⟨i, hi⟩)
(map (map_ring_hom i) I) _ (eq_zero_of_polynomial_mem_map_range I),
end
theorem is_jacobson_polynomial_iff_is_jacobson :
is_jacobson (polynomial R) ↔ is_jacobson R :=
begin
refine ⟨_, is_jacobson_polynomial_of_is_jacobson⟩,
introI H,
exact is_jacobson_of_surjective ⟨eval₂_ring_hom (ring_hom.id _) 1, λ x,
⟨C x, by simp only [coe_eval₂_ring_hom, ring_hom.id_apply, eval₂_C]⟩⟩,
end
instance [is_jacobson R] : is_jacobson (polynomial R) :=
is_jacobson_polynomial_iff_is_jacobson.mpr ‹is_jacobson R›
end comm_ring
section integral_domain
variables {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] [is_jacobson R]
variables (P : ideal (polynomial R)) [hP : P.is_maximal]
include P hP
lemma is_maximal_comap_C_of_is_maximal (hP' : ∀ (x : R), C x ∈ P → x = 0) :
is_maximal (comap C P : ideal R) :=
begin
haveI hp'_prime : (P.comap C : ideal R).is_prime := comap_is_prime C P,
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt (bot_lt_of_maximal P polynomial_not_is_field),
have : (m : polynomial R) ≠ 0, rwa [ne.def, submodule.coe_eq_zero],
let φ : (P.comap C : ideal R).quotient →+* P.quotient := quotient_map P C le_rfl,
let M : submonoid (P.comap C : ideal R).quotient :=
submonoid.powers ((m : polynomial R).map (quotient.mk (P.comap C : ideal R))).leading_coeff,
rw ← bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff at hP ⊢,
have hp0 : ((m : polynomial R).map (quotient.mk (P.comap C : ideal R))).leading_coeff ≠ 0 :=
λ hp0', this $ map_injective (quotient.mk (P.comap C : ideal R))
((quotient.mk (P.comap C : ideal R)).injective_iff.2 (λ x hx,
by rwa [quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, (by rwa eq_bot_iff : (P.comap C : ideal R) = ⊥)] at hx))
(by simpa only [leading_coeff_eq_zero, map_zero] using hp0'),
let ϕ : localization_map M (localization M) := localization.of M,
have hM : (0 : ((P.comap C : ideal R)).quotient) ∉ M := λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hp0 (pow_eq_zero hn),
suffices : (⊥ : ideal (localization M)).is_maximal,
{ rw ← ϕ.comap_map_of_is_prime_disjoint ⊥ bot_prime (λ x hx, hM (hx.2 ▸ hx.1)),
refine ((is_maximal_iff_is_maximal_disjoint ϕ _).mp _).1,
rwa map_bot },
let M' : submonoid P.quotient := M.map φ,
have hM' : (0 : P.quotient) ∉ M' :=
λ ⟨z, hz⟩, hM (quotient_map_injective (trans hz.2 φ.map_zero.symm) ▸ hz.1),
letI : integral_domain (localization M') :=
localization_map.integral_domain_localization (le_non_zero_divisors_of_domain hM'),
let ϕ' : localization_map (M.map ↑φ) (localization (M.map ↑φ)) := localization.of (M.map ↑φ),
suffices : (⊥ : ideal (localization M')).is_maximal,
{ rw le_antisymm bot_le (comap_bot_le_of_injective _ (map_injective_of_injective _
quotient_map_injective M ϕ ϕ' (le_non_zero_divisors_of_domain hM'))),
refine is_maximal_comap_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal' _ _ ⊥ this,
refine is_integral_localization_map_polynomial_quotient P _ (submodule.coe_mem m) ϕ ϕ', },
rw (map_bot.symm : (⊥ : ideal (localization M')) = map ϕ'.to_map ⊥),
refine map.is_maximal ϕ'.to_map (localization_map_bijective_of_field hM' _ ϕ') hP,
rwa [← quotient.maximal_ideal_iff_is_field_quotient, ← bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff],
end
/-- Used to bootstrap the more general `quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson` -/
private lemma quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson' (hR : is_jacobson R)
(hP' : ∀ (x : R), C x ∈ P → x = 0) :
((quotient.mk P).comp C : R →+* P.quotient).is_integral :=
begin
refine (is_integral_quotient_map_iff _).mp _,
let P' : ideal R := P.comap C,
obtain ⟨pX, hpX, hp0⟩ :=
exists_nonzero_mem_of_ne_bot (ne_of_lt (bot_lt_of_maximal P polynomial_not_is_field)).symm hP',
let M : submonoid P'.quotient := submonoid.powers (pX.map (quotient.mk P')).leading_coeff,
let φ : P'.quotient →+* P.quotient := quotient_map P C le_rfl,
let ϕ' : localization_map (M.map ↑φ) (localization (M.map ↑φ)) := localization.of (M.map ↑φ),
haveI hp'_prime : P'.is_prime := comap_is_prime C P,
have hM : (0 : P'.quotient) ∉ M := λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hp0 $ leading_coeff_eq_zero.mp (pow_eq_zero hn),
refine ((quotient_map P C le_rfl).is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral
(localization.of (M.map ↑(quotient_map P C le_rfl))).to_map _ _),
{ refine ϕ'.injective (le_non_zero_divisors_of_domain (λ hM', hM _)),
exact (let ⟨z, zM, z0⟩ := hM' in (quotient_map_injective (trans z0 φ.map_zero.symm)) ▸ zM) },
{ let ϕ : localization_map M (localization M) := localization.of M,
rw ← (ϕ.map_comp _),
refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans ϕ.to_map
(ϕ.map (M.mem_map_of_mem (φ : P'.quotient →* P.quotient)) ϕ') _ _,
{ exact ϕ.to_map.is_integral_of_surjective (localization_map_bijective_of_field hM
((quotient.maximal_ideal_iff_is_field_quotient _).mp
(is_maximal_comap_C_of_is_maximal P hP')) _).2 },
{ exact is_integral_localization_map_polynomial_quotient P pX hpX _ _ } }
end
/-- If `R` is a Jacobson ring, and `P` is a maximal ideal of `polynomial R`,
then `R → (polynomial R)/P` is an integral map. -/
lemma quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson :
((quotient.mk P).comp C : R →+* P.quotient).is_integral :=
begin
let P' : ideal R := P.comap C,
haveI : P'.is_prime := comap_is_prime C P,
let f : polynomial R →+* polynomial P'.quotient := polynomial.map_ring_hom (quotient.mk P'),
have hf : function.surjective f := map_surjective (quotient.mk P') quotient.mk_surjective,
have hPJ : P = (P.map f).comap f,
{ rw comap_map_of_surjective _ hf,
refine le_antisymm (le_sup_left_of_le le_rfl) (sup_le le_rfl _),
refine λ p hp, polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal P p (λ n, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mp _),
simpa only [coeff_map, coe_map_ring_hom] using (polynomial.ext_iff.mp hp) n },
refine ring_hom.is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral _ _ (injective_quotient_le_comap_map P) _,
rw ← quotient_mk_maps_eq,
refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ _
((quotient.mk P').is_integral_of_surjective quotient.mk_surjective) _,
apply quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson' _ _ (λ x hx, _),
any_goals { exact ideal.is_jacobson_quotient },
{ exact or.rec_on (map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective f hf hP)
(λ h, absurd (trans (h ▸ hPJ : P = comap f ⊤) comap_top : P = ⊤) hP.ne_top) id },
{ obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective x,
rwa [quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, mem_comap, hPJ, mem_comap, coe_map_ring_hom, map_C] }
end
lemma is_maximal_comap_C_of_is_jacobson : (P.comap (C : R →+* polynomial R)).is_maximal :=
begin
rw [← @mk_ker _ _ P, ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot, comap_comap],
exact is_maximal_comap_of_is_integral_of_is_maximal' _
(quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson P) ⊥ ((bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff _).mpr hP),
end
omit P hP
lemma comp_C_integral_of_surjective_of_jacobson
{S : Type*} [field S] (f : (polynomial R) →+* S) (hf : function.surjective f) :
(f.comp C).is_integral :=
begin
haveI : (f.ker).is_maximal := @comap_is_maximal_of_surjective _ _ _ _ f ⊥ hf bot_is_maximal,
let g : f.ker.quotient →+* S := ideal.quotient.lift f.ker f (λ _ h, h),
have hfg : (g.comp (quotient.mk f.ker)) = f := ring_hom_ext' rfl rfl,
rw [← hfg, ring_hom.comp_assoc],
refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ g (quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson f.ker)
(g.is_integral_of_surjective _), --(quotient.lift_surjective f.ker f _ hf)),
rw [← hfg] at hf,
exact function.surjective.of_comp hf,
end
end integral_domain
end polynomial
namespace mv_polynomial
open mv_polynomial ring_hom
lemma is_jacobson_mv_polynomial_fin {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [H : is_jacobson R] :
∀ (n : ℕ), is_jacobson (mv_polynomial (fin n) R)
| 0 := ((is_jacobson_iso ((rename_equiv R
(equiv.equiv_pempty $ fin.elim0)).to_ring_equiv.trans (pempty_ring_equiv R))).mpr H)
| (n+1) := (is_jacobson_iso (fin_succ_equiv R n).to_ring_equiv).2
(polynomial.is_jacobson_polynomial_iff_is_jacobson.2 (is_jacobson_mv_polynomial_fin n))
/-- General form of the nullstellensatz for Jacobson rings, since in a Jacobson ring we have
`Inf {P maximal | P ≥ I} = Inf {P prime | P ≥ I} = I.radical`. Fields are always Jacobson,
and in that special case this is (most of) the classical Nullstellensatz,
since `I(V(I))` is the intersection of maximal ideals containing `I`, which is then `I.radical` -/
instance {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] [is_jacobson R] :
is_jacobson (mv_polynomial ι R) :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq ι,
obtain ⟨e⟩ := fintype.equiv_fin ι,
rw is_jacobson_iso (rename_equiv R e).to_ring_equiv,
exact is_jacobson_mv_polynomial_fin _
end
variables {n : ℕ}
lemma quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] [is_jacobson R]
(P : ideal (mv_polynomial (fin n) R)) [P.is_maximal] :
((quotient.mk P).comp mv_polynomial.C : R →+* P.quotient).is_integral :=
begin
unfreezingI {induction n with n IH},
{ refine ring_hom.is_integral_of_surjective _ (function.surjective.comp quotient.mk_surjective _),
exact C_surjective_fin_0 },
{ rw [← fin_succ_equiv_comp_C_eq_C, ← ring_hom.comp_assoc, ← ring_hom.comp_assoc,
← quotient_map_comp_mk le_rfl, ring_hom.comp_assoc (polynomial.C),
← quotient_map_comp_mk le_rfl, ring_hom.comp_assoc, ring_hom.comp_assoc,
← quotient_map_comp_mk le_rfl, ← ring_hom.comp_assoc (quotient.mk _)],
refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ _ _ _,
{ refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ _ (is_integral_of_surjective _ quotient.mk_surjective) _,
refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ _ _ _,
{ apply (is_integral_quotient_map_iff _).mpr (IH _),
apply polynomial.is_maximal_comap_C_of_is_jacobson _,
{ exact mv_polynomial.is_jacobson_mv_polynomial_fin n },
{ apply comap_is_maximal_of_surjective,
exact (fin_succ_equiv R n).symm.surjective } },
{ refine (is_integral_quotient_map_iff _).mpr _,
rw ← quotient_map_comp_mk le_rfl,
refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ _ _ ((is_integral_quotient_map_iff _).mpr _),
{ exact ring_hom.is_integral_of_surjective _ quotient.mk_surjective },
{ apply polynomial.quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson _,
{ exact mv_polynomial.is_jacobson_mv_polynomial_fin n },
{ exact comap_is_maximal_of_surjective _ (fin_succ_equiv R n).symm.surjective } } } },
{ refine (is_integral_quotient_map_iff _).mpr _,
refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ _ _ (is_integral_of_surjective _ quotient.mk_surjective),
exact ring_hom.is_integral_of_surjective _ (fin_succ_equiv R n).symm.surjective } }
end
lemma comp_C_integral_of_surjective_of_jacobson {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] [is_jacobson R]
{σ : Type*} [fintype σ] {S : Type*} [field S] (f : mv_polynomial σ R →+* S)
(hf : function.surjective f) : (f.comp C).is_integral :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq σ,
obtain ⟨e⟩ := fintype.equiv_fin σ,
let f' : mv_polynomial (fin _) R →+* S :=
f.comp (rename_equiv R e.symm).to_ring_equiv.to_ring_hom,
have hf' : function.surjective f' :=
((function.surjective.comp hf (rename_equiv R e.symm).surjective)),
have : (f'.comp C).is_integral,
{ haveI : (f'.ker).is_maximal := @comap_is_maximal_of_surjective _ _ _ _ f' ⊥ hf' bot_is_maximal,
let g : f'.ker.quotient →+* S := ideal.quotient.lift f'.ker f' (λ _ h, h),
have hfg : (g.comp (quotient.mk f'.ker)) = f' := ring_hom_ext (λ r, rfl) (λ i, rfl),
rw [← hfg, ring_hom.comp_assoc],
refine ring_hom.is_integral_trans _ g (quotient_mk_comp_C_is_integral_of_jacobson f'.ker)
(g.is_integral_of_surjective _),
rw ← hfg at hf',
exact function.surjective.of_comp hf' },
rw ring_hom.comp_assoc at this,
convert this,
refine ring_hom.ext (λ x, _),
exact ((rename_equiv R e.symm).commutes' x).symm,
end
end mv_polynomial
end ideal
|
061f2e55c363ea4c564b9330fd8a7824698adf22 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /test/expand_exists.lean | 852e8fd132dfd47b5eef45144eb1623258aa8ee5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,750 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Ian Wood. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ian Wood
-/
import tactic.basic
import tactic.expand_exists
@[expand_exists nat_greater nat_greater_spec]
lemma nat_greater_exists (n : ℕ) : ∃ m : ℕ, n < m := ⟨n + 1, by fconstructor⟩
noncomputable def nat_greater_res : ℕ → ℕ := nat_greater
lemma nat_greater_spec_res : ∀ (n : ℕ), n < nat_greater n := nat_greater_spec
@[expand_exists dependent_type dependent_type_val dependent_type_spec]
lemma dependent_type_exists {α : Type*} (a : α) : ∃ {β : Type} (b : β), (a, b) = (a, b) :=
⟨unit, (), rfl⟩
def dependent_type_res {α : Type*} (a : α) : Type := dependent_type a
noncomputable def dependent_type_val_res {α : Type*} (a : α) : dependent_type a :=
dependent_type_val a
lemma dependent_type_spec_res
{α : Type*} (a : α) : (a, dependent_type_val a) = (a, dependent_type_val a) := dependent_type_spec a
@[expand_exists nat_greater_nosplit nat_greater_nosplit_spec,
expand_exists nat_greater_split nat_greater_split_lt nat_greater_split_neq]
lemma nat_greater_exists₂ (n : ℕ) : ∃ m : ℕ, n < m ∧ m ≠ 0 := begin
use n + 1,
split,
fconstructor,
finish,
end
noncomputable def nat_greater_nosplit_res : ℕ → ℕ := nat_greater_nosplit
noncomputable def nat_greater_split_res : ℕ → ℕ := nat_greater_split
lemma nat_greater_nosplit_spec_res :
∀ (n : ℕ), n < nat_greater_nosplit n ∧ nat_greater_nosplit n ≠ 0 := nat_greater_nosplit_spec
lemma nat_greater_split_spec_lt_res : ∀ (n : ℕ), n < nat_greater_nosplit n := nat_greater_split_lt
lemma nat_greater_split_spec_neq_res : ∀ (n : ℕ), nat_greater_nosplit n ≠ 0 := nat_greater_split_neq
|
47715f674d4371fda1c82b2767fc9ace662d1546 | 5756a081670ba9c1d1d3fca7bd47cb4e31beae66 | /lakefile.lean | 81fecbca984a5d970515d0c108e0218287257b0a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathport | 2c9bdc8292168febf59799efdc5451dbf0450d4a | 13051f68064f7638970d39a8fecaede68ffbf9e1 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,841,364,079 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 379,357,010 | 27 | 10 | Apache-2.0 | 1,691,309,132,000 | 1,624,384,521,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 859 | lean | import Lake
open Lake DSL
package mathport
-- Please ensure that `lean-toolchain` points to the same release of Lean 4
-- as this commit of mathlib4 uses.
require mathlib from git "https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4"@"master"
target ffi.o pkg : FilePath := do
let oFile := pkg.buildDir / "c" / "ffi.o"
let srcJob ← inputFile <| pkg.dir / "Mathport" / "FFI.cpp"
let flags := #["-I", (← getLeanIncludeDir).toString, "-fPIC"]
buildO "FFI.c" oFile srcJob flags "c++"
extern_lib libleanffi (pkg : NPackage `mathport) := do
let name := nameToStaticLib "leanffi"
let ffiO ← fetch <| pkg.target ``ffi.o
buildStaticLib (pkg.nativeLibDir / name) #[ffiO]
lean_lib Mathport
@[default_target]
lean_exe mathport where
root := `MathportApp
supportInterpreter := true
@[default_target]
lean_exe printast where
root := `PrintAST
|
804c262b58c34c05564809af14ca107c9cd3b6bf | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /stage0/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Simp.lean | f6f0d9e938654e53af8f0a870f9083e2113e82be | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 787 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.SimpLemmas
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.CongrLemmas
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.Types
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.Main
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.Rewrite
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.SimpAll
namespace Lean
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Meta.Tactic.simp
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Meta.Tactic.simp.congr
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Meta.Tactic.simp.discharge
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Meta.Tactic.simp.rewrite
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Meta.Tactic.simp.unify
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Debug.Meta.Tactic.simp
end Lean
|
2f6de13badf56aea02767f65e171ad4a11972439 | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/category_theory/essentially_small.lean | 13d203e467a162a9a18c82b6e3fdd2b514673ec5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,157 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import logic.small
import category_theory.skeletal
/-!
# Essentially small categories.
A category given by `(C : Type u) [category.{v} C]` is `w`-essentially small
if there exists a `small_model C : Type w` equipped with `[small_category (small_model C)]`.
A category is `w`-locally small if every hom type is `w`-small.
The main theorem here is that a category is `w`-essentially small iff
the type `skeleton C` is `w`-small, and `C` is `w`-locally small.
-/
universes w v v' u u'
open category_theory
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
namespace category_theory
/-- A category is `essentially_small.{w}` if there exists
an equivalence to some `S : Type w` with `[small_category S]`. -/
class essentially_small (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] : Prop :=
(equiv_small_category : ∃ (S : Type w) [small_category S], by exactI nonempty (C ≌ S))
/-- Constructor for `essentially_small C` from an explicit small category witness. -/
lemma essentially_small.mk' {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] {S : Type w} [small_category S]
(e : C ≌ S) : essentially_small.{w} C :=
⟨⟨S, _, ⟨e⟩⟩⟩
/--
An arbitrarily chosen small model for an essentially small category.
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
def small_model (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] [essentially_small.{w} C] : Type w :=
classical.some (@essentially_small.equiv_small_category C _ _)
noncomputable
instance small_category_small_model
(C : Type u) [category.{v} C] [essentially_small.{w} C] : small_category (small_model C) :=
classical.some (classical.some_spec (@essentially_small.equiv_small_category C _ _))
/--
The (noncomputable) categorical equivalence between
an essentially small category and its small model.
-/
noncomputable
def equiv_small_model (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] [essentially_small.{w} C] : C ≌ small_model C :=
nonempty.some (classical.some_spec (classical.some_spec
(@essentially_small.equiv_small_category C _ _)))
lemma essentially_small_congr {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] {D : Type u'} [category.{v'} D]
(e : C ≌ D) : essentially_small.{w} C ↔ essentially_small.{w} D :=
begin
fsplit,
{ rintro ⟨S, 𝒮, ⟨f⟩⟩,
resetI,
exact essentially_small.mk' (e.symm.trans f), },
{ rintro ⟨S, 𝒮, ⟨f⟩⟩,
resetI,
exact essentially_small.mk' (e.trans f), },
end
/--
A category is `w`-locally small if every hom set is `w`-small.
See `shrink_homs C` for a category instance where every hom set has been replaced by a small model.
-/
class locally_small (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] : Prop :=
(hom_small : ∀ X Y : C, small.{w} (X ⟶ Y) . tactic.apply_instance)
instance (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] [locally_small.{w} C] (X Y : C) :
small (X ⟶ Y) :=
locally_small.hom_small X Y
lemma locally_small_congr {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] {D : Type u'} [category.{v'} D]
(e : C ≌ D) : locally_small.{w} C ↔ locally_small.{w} D :=
begin
fsplit,
{ rintro ⟨L⟩,
fsplit,
intros X Y,
specialize L (e.inverse.obj X) (e.inverse.obj Y),
refine (small_congr _).mpr L,
exact equiv_of_fully_faithful e.inverse, },
{ rintro ⟨L⟩,
fsplit,
intros X Y,
specialize L (e.functor.obj X) (e.functor.obj Y),
refine (small_congr _).mpr L,
exact equiv_of_fully_faithful e.functor, },
end
@[priority 100]
instance locally_small_self (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] : locally_small.{v} C := {}
@[priority 100]
instance locally_small_of_essentially_small
(C : Type u) [category.{v} C] [essentially_small.{w} C] : locally_small.{w} C :=
(locally_small_congr (equiv_small_model C)).mpr (category_theory.locally_small_self _)
/--
We define a type alias `shrink_homs C` for `C`. When we have `locally_small.{w} C`,
we'll put a `category.{w}` instance on `shrink_homs C`.
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
def shrink_homs (C : Type u) := C
namespace shrink_homs
section
variables {C' : Type*} -- a fresh variable with no category instance attached
/-- Help the typechecker by explicitly translating from `C` to `shrink_homs C`. -/
def to_shrink_homs {C' : Type*} (X : C') : shrink_homs C' := X
/-- Help the typechecker by explicitly translating from `shrink_homs C` to `C`. -/
def from_shrink_homs {C' : Type*} (X : shrink_homs C') : C' := X
@[simp] lemma to_from (X : C') : from_shrink_homs (to_shrink_homs X) = X := rfl
@[simp] lemma from_to (X : shrink_homs C') : to_shrink_homs (from_shrink_homs X) = X := rfl
end
variables (C) [locally_small.{w} C]
@[simps]
noncomputable
instance : category.{w} (shrink_homs C) :=
{ hom := λ X Y, shrink (from_shrink_homs X ⟶ from_shrink_homs Y),
id := λ X, equiv_shrink _ (𝟙 (from_shrink_homs X)),
comp := λ X Y Z f g,
equiv_shrink _ (((equiv_shrink _).symm f) ≫ ((equiv_shrink _).symm g)), }.
/-- Implementation of `shrink_homs.equivalence`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable
def functor : C ⥤ shrink_homs C :=
{ obj := λ X, to_shrink_homs X,
map := λ X Y f, equiv_shrink (X ⟶ Y) f, }
/-- Implementation of `shrink_homs.equivalence`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable
def inverse : shrink_homs C ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ X, from_shrink_homs X,
map := λ X Y f, (equiv_shrink (from_shrink_homs X ⟶ from_shrink_homs Y)).symm f, }
/--
The categorical equivalence between `C` and `shrink_homs C`, when `C` is locally small.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable
def equivalence : C ≌ shrink_homs C :=
equivalence.mk (functor C) (inverse C)
(nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl X) (by tidy))
(nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl X) (by tidy))
end shrink_homs
/--
A category is essentially small if and only if
the underlying type of its skeleton (i.e. the "set" of isomorphism classes) is small,
and it is locally small.
-/
theorem essentially_small_iff (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] :
essentially_small.{w} C ↔ small.{w} (skeleton C) ∧ locally_small.{w} C :=
begin
-- This theorem is the only bit of real work in this file.
fsplit,
{ intro h,
fsplit,
{ rcases h with ⟨S, 𝒮, ⟨e⟩⟩,
resetI,
refine ⟨⟨skeleton S, ⟨_⟩⟩⟩,
exact e.skeleton_equiv, },
{ resetI, apply_instance, }, },
{ rintro ⟨⟨S, ⟨e⟩⟩, L⟩,
resetI,
let e' := (shrink_homs.equivalence C).skeleton_equiv.symm,
refine ⟨⟨S, _, ⟨_⟩⟩⟩,
apply induced_category.category (e'.trans e).symm,
refine (shrink_homs.equivalence C).trans
((skeleton_equivalence _).symm.trans
((induced_functor (e'.trans e).symm).as_equivalence.symm)), },
end
/--
Any thin category is locally small.
-/
@[priority 100]
instance locally_small_of_thin {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [∀ X Y : C, subsingleton (X ⟶ Y)] :
locally_small.{w} C := {}
/--
A thin category is essentially small if and only if the underlying type of its skeleton is small.
-/
theorem essentially_small_iff_of_thin
{C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [∀ X Y : C, subsingleton (X ⟶ Y)] :
essentially_small.{w} C ↔ small.{w} (skeleton C) :=
by simp [essentially_small_iff, category_theory.locally_small_of_thin]
end category_theory
|
e6f80b0617a9f210736aa1d02c75225127c74c2a | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/structure_result_type_may_be_zero.lean | b7a43268187213c5ebc85033d768b25043bf7668 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 95 | lean | structure {uA uB} Fun (A : Sort uA) (B : Sort uB) : Sort (imax uA uB) := (item : Π(a : A), B)
|
3516dba04143a955da7b52e632bc79e3851ad504 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/hom/group_instances.lean | ba5ff959d7466fd8d98f7fc87e7ae91cca8ba23e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,046 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kevin Buzzard, Scott Morrison, Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes,
Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.group_power.basic
import algebra.ring.basic
/-!
# Instances on spaces of monoid and group morphisms
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
We endow the space of monoid morphisms `M →* N` with a `comm_monoid` structure when the target is
commutative, through pointwise multiplication, and with a `comm_group` structure when the target
is a commutative group. We also prove the same instances for additive situations.
Since these structures permit morphisms of morphisms, we also provide some composition-like
operations.
Finally, we provide the `ring` structure on `add_monoid.End`.
-/
universes uM uN uP uQ
variables {M : Type uM} {N : Type uN} {P : Type uP} {Q : Type uQ}
/-- `(M →* N)` is a `comm_monoid` if `N` is commutative. -/
@[to_additive "`(M →+ N)` is an `add_comm_monoid` if `N` is commutative."]
instance [mul_one_class M] [comm_monoid N] : comm_monoid (M →* N) :=
{ mul := (*),
mul_assoc := by intros; ext; apply mul_assoc,
one := 1,
one_mul := by intros; ext; apply one_mul,
mul_one := by intros; ext; apply mul_one,
mul_comm := by intros; ext; apply mul_comm,
npow := λ n f,
{ to_fun := λ x, (f x) ^ n,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := λ x y, by simp [mul_pow] },
npow_zero' := λ f, by { ext x, simp },
npow_succ' := λ n f, by { ext x, simp [pow_succ] } }
/-- If `G` is a commutative group, then `M →* G` is a commutative group too. -/
@[to_additive "If `G` is an additive commutative group, then `M →+ G` is an additive commutative
group too."]
instance {M G} [mul_one_class M] [comm_group G] : comm_group (M →* G) :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
div := has_div.div,
div_eq_mul_inv := by { intros, ext, apply div_eq_mul_inv },
mul_left_inv := by intros; ext; apply mul_left_inv,
zpow := λ n f, { to_fun := λ x, (f x) ^ n,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := λ x y, by simp [mul_zpow] },
zpow_zero' := λ f, by { ext x, simp },
zpow_succ' := λ n f, by { ext x, simp [zpow_of_nat, pow_succ] },
zpow_neg' := λ n f, by { ext x, simp },
..monoid_hom.comm_monoid }
instance [add_comm_monoid M] : add_comm_monoid (add_monoid.End M) :=
add_monoid_hom.add_comm_monoid
instance [add_comm_monoid M] : semiring (add_monoid.End M) :=
{ zero_mul := λ x, add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ i, rfl,
mul_zero := λ x, add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ i, add_monoid_hom.map_zero _,
left_distrib := λ x y z, add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ i, add_monoid_hom.map_add _ _ _,
right_distrib := λ x y z, add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ i, rfl,
nat_cast := λ n, n • 1,
nat_cast_zero := add_monoid.nsmul_zero' _,
nat_cast_succ := λ n, (add_monoid.nsmul_succ' n 1).trans (add_comm _ _),
.. add_monoid.End.monoid M,
.. add_monoid_hom.add_comm_monoid }
/-- See also `add_monoid.End.nat_cast_def`. -/
@[simp] lemma add_monoid.End.nat_cast_apply [add_comm_monoid M] (n : ℕ) (m : M) :
(↑n : add_monoid.End M) m = n • m := rfl
instance [add_comm_group M] : add_comm_group (add_monoid.End M) :=
add_monoid_hom.add_comm_group
instance [add_comm_group M] : ring (add_monoid.End M) :=
{ int_cast := λ z, z • 1,
int_cast_of_nat := of_nat_zsmul _,
int_cast_neg_succ_of_nat := zsmul_neg_succ_of_nat _,
.. add_monoid.End.semiring,
.. add_monoid_hom.add_comm_group }
/-- See also `add_monoid.End.int_cast_def`. -/
@[simp] lemma add_monoid.End.int_cast_apply [add_comm_group M] (z : ℤ) (m : M) :
(↑z : add_monoid.End M) m = z • m := rfl
/-!
### Morphisms of morphisms
The structures above permit morphisms that themselves produce morphisms, provided the codomain
is commutative.
-/
namespace monoid_hom
@[to_additive]
lemma ext_iff₂ {mM : mul_one_class M} {mN : mul_one_class N} {mP : comm_monoid P}
{f g : M →* N →* P} :
f = g ↔ (∀ x y, f x y = g x y) :=
monoid_hom.ext_iff.trans $ forall_congr $ λ _, monoid_hom.ext_iff
/-- `flip` arguments of `f : M →* N →* P` -/
@[to_additive "`flip` arguments of `f : M →+ N →+ P`"]
def flip {mM : mul_one_class M} {mN : mul_one_class N} {mP : comm_monoid P} (f : M →* N →* P) :
N →* M →* P :=
{ to_fun := λ y, ⟨λ x, f x y, by rw [f.map_one, one_apply], λ x₁ x₂, by rw [f.map_mul, mul_apply]⟩,
map_one' := ext $ λ x, (f x).map_one,
map_mul' := λ y₁ y₂, ext $ λ x, (f x).map_mul y₁ y₂ }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma flip_apply
{mM : mul_one_class M} {mN : mul_one_class N} {mP : comm_monoid P}
(f : M →* N →* P) (x : M) (y : N) :
f.flip y x = f x y :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma map_one₂ {mM : mul_one_class M} {mN : mul_one_class N} {mP : comm_monoid P}
(f : M →* N →* P) (n : N) : f 1 n = 1 :=
(flip f n).map_one
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul₂ {mM : mul_one_class M} {mN : mul_one_class N} {mP : comm_monoid P}
(f : M →* N →* P) (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : f (m₁ * m₂) n = f m₁ n * f m₂ n :=
(flip f n).map_mul _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma map_inv₂ {mM : group M} {mN : mul_one_class N} {mP : comm_group P}
(f : M →* N →* P) (m : M) (n : N) : f m⁻¹ n = (f m n)⁻¹ :=
(flip f n).map_inv _
@[to_additive]
lemma map_div₂ {mM : group M} {mN : mul_one_class N} {mP : comm_group P}
(f : M →* N →* P) (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : f (m₁ / m₂) n = f m₁ n / f m₂ n :=
(flip f n).map_div _ _
/-- Evaluation of a `monoid_hom` at a point as a monoid homomorphism. See also `monoid_hom.apply`
for the evaluation of any function at a point. -/
@[to_additive "Evaluation of an `add_monoid_hom` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See also `add_monoid_hom.apply` for the evaluation of any function at a point.", simps]
def eval [mul_one_class M] [comm_monoid N] : M →* (M →* N) →* N := (monoid_hom.id (M →* N)).flip
/-- The expression `λ g m, g (f m)` as a `monoid_hom`.
Equivalently, `(λ g, monoid_hom.comp g f)` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[to_additive "The expression `λ g m, g (f m)` as a `add_monoid_hom`.
Equivalently, `(λ g, monoid_hom.comp g f)` as a `add_monoid_hom`.
This also exists in a `linear_map` version, `linear_map.lcomp`.", simps]
def comp_hom' [mul_one_class M] [mul_one_class N] [comm_monoid P] (f : M →* N) :
(N →* P) →* M →* P :=
flip $ eval.comp f
/-- Composition of monoid morphisms (`monoid_hom.comp`) as a monoid morphism.
Note that unlike `monoid_hom.comp_hom'` this requires commutativity of `N`. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of additive monoid morphisms (`add_monoid_hom.comp`) as an additive
monoid morphism.
Note that unlike `add_monoid_hom.comp_hom'` this requires commutativity of `N`.
This also exists in a `linear_map` version, `linear_map.llcomp`.", simps]
def comp_hom [mul_one_class M] [comm_monoid N] [comm_monoid P] :
(N →* P) →* (M →* N) →* (M →* P) :=
{ to_fun := λ g, { to_fun := g.comp, map_one' := comp_one g, map_mul' := comp_mul g },
map_one' := by { ext1 f, exact one_comp f },
map_mul' := λ g₁ g₂, by { ext1 f, exact mul_comp g₁ g₂ f } }
/-- Flipping arguments of monoid morphisms (`monoid_hom.flip`) as a monoid morphism. -/
@[to_additive "Flipping arguments of additive monoid morphisms (`add_monoid_hom.flip`)
as an additive monoid morphism.", simps]
def flip_hom {mM : mul_one_class M} {mN : mul_one_class N} {mP : comm_monoid P}
: (M →* N →* P) →* (N →* M →* P) :=
{ to_fun := monoid_hom.flip, map_one' := rfl, map_mul' := λ f g, rfl }
/-- The expression `λ m q, f m (g q)` as a `monoid_hom`.
Note that the expression `λ q n, f (g q) n` is simply `monoid_hom.comp`. -/
@[to_additive "The expression `λ m q, f m (g q)` as an `add_monoid_hom`.
Note that the expression `λ q n, f (g q) n` is simply `add_monoid_hom.comp`.
This also exists as a `linear_map` version, `linear_map.compl₂`"]
def compl₂ [mul_one_class M] [mul_one_class N] [comm_monoid P] [mul_one_class Q]
(f : M →* N →* P) (g : Q →* N) : M →* Q →* P :=
(comp_hom' g).comp f
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma compl₂_apply [mul_one_class M] [mul_one_class N] [comm_monoid P] [mul_one_class Q]
(f : M →* N →* P) (g : Q →* N) (m : M) (q : Q) :
(compl₂ f g) m q = f m (g q) := rfl
/-- The expression `λ m n, g (f m n)` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[to_additive "The expression `λ m n, g (f m n)` as an `add_monoid_hom`.
This also exists as a linear_map version, `linear_map.compr₂`"]
def compr₂ [mul_one_class M] [mul_one_class N] [comm_monoid P] [comm_monoid Q]
(f : M →* N →* P) (g : P →* Q) : M →* N →* Q :=
(comp_hom g).comp f
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma compr₂_apply [mul_one_class M] [mul_one_class N] [comm_monoid P] [comm_monoid Q]
(f : M →* N →* P) (g : P →* Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
(compr₂ f g) m n = g (f m n) := rfl
end monoid_hom
/-!
### Miscellaneous definitions
Due to the fact this file imports `algebra.group_power.basic`, it is not possible to import it in
some of the lower-level files like `algebra.ring.basic`. The following lemmas should be rehomed
if the import structure permits them to be.
-/
section semiring
variables {R S : Type*} [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring R] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring S]
/-- Multiplication of an element of a (semi)ring is an `add_monoid_hom` in both arguments.
This is a more-strongly bundled version of `add_monoid_hom.mul_left` and `add_monoid_hom.mul_right`.
Stronger versions of this exists for algebras as `linear_map.mul`, `non_unital_alg_hom.mul`
and `algebra.lmul`.
-/
def add_monoid_hom.mul : R →+ R →+ R :=
{ to_fun := add_monoid_hom.mul_left,
map_zero' := add_monoid_hom.ext $ zero_mul,
map_add' := λ a b, add_monoid_hom.ext $ add_mul a b }
lemma add_monoid_hom.mul_apply (x y : R) : add_monoid_hom.mul x y = x * y := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_monoid_hom.coe_mul :
⇑(add_monoid_hom.mul : R →+ R →+ R) = add_monoid_hom.mul_left := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_monoid_hom.coe_flip_mul :
⇑(add_monoid_hom.mul : R →+ R →+ R).flip = add_monoid_hom.mul_right := rfl
/-- An `add_monoid_hom` preserves multiplication if pre- and post- composition with
`add_monoid_hom.mul` are equivalent. By converting the statement into an equality of
`add_monoid_hom`s, this lemma allows various specialized `ext` lemmas about `→+` to then be applied.
-/
lemma add_monoid_hom.map_mul_iff (f : R →+ S) :
(∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) ↔
(add_monoid_hom.mul : R →+ R →+ R).compr₂ f = (add_monoid_hom.mul.comp f).compl₂ f :=
iff.symm add_monoid_hom.ext_iff₂
/-- The left multiplication map: `(a, b) ↦ a * b`. See also `add_monoid_hom.mul_left`. -/
@[simps] def add_monoid.End.mul_left : R →+ add_monoid.End R := add_monoid_hom.mul
/-- The right multiplication map: `(a, b) ↦ b * a`. See also `add_monoid_hom.mul_right`. -/
@[simps] def add_monoid.End.mul_right : R →+ add_monoid.End R :=
(add_monoid_hom.mul : R →+ add_monoid.End R).flip
end semiring
|
55d5bec34344acda78f080ee956ddab1ec3d9beb | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/control/traversable/equiv.lean | 205a4a8d4d7aa50ba819ba634755c92f9476db4c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,340 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import control.traversable.lemmas
import logic.equiv.defs
/-!
# Transferring `traversable` instances along isomorphisms
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file allows to transfer `traversable` instances along isomorphisms.
## Main declarations
* `equiv.map`: Turns functorially a function `α → β` into a function `t' α → t' β` using the functor
`t` and the equivalence `Π α, t α ≃ t' α`.
* `equiv.functor`: `equiv.map` as a functor.
* `equiv.traverse`: Turns traversably a function `α → m β` into a function `t' α → m (t' β)` using
the traversable functor `t` and the equivalence `Π α, t α ≃ t' α`.
* `equiv.traversable`: `equiv.traverse` as a traversable functor.
* `equiv.is_lawful_traversable`: `equiv.traverse` as a lawful traversable functor.
-/
universes u
namespace equiv
section functor
parameters {t t' : Type u → Type u}
parameters (eqv : Π α, t α ≃ t' α)
variables [functor t]
open functor
/-- Given a functor `t`, a function `t' : Type u → Type u`, and
equivalences `t α ≃ t' α` for all `α`, then every function `α → β` can
be mapped to a function `t' α → t' β` functorially (see
`equiv.functor`). -/
protected def map {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (x : t' α) : t' β :=
eqv β $ map f ((eqv α).symm x)
/-- The function `equiv.map` transfers the functoriality of `t` to
`t'` using the equivalences `eqv`. -/
protected def functor : functor t' :=
{ map := @equiv.map _ }
variables [is_lawful_functor t]
protected lemma id_map {α : Type u} (x : t' α) : equiv.map id x = x :=
by simp [equiv.map, id_map]
protected lemma comp_map {α β γ : Type u} (g : α → β) (h : β → γ) (x : t' α) :
equiv.map (h ∘ g) x = equiv.map h (equiv.map g x) :=
by simp [equiv.map]; apply comp_map
protected lemma is_lawful_functor : @is_lawful_functor _ equiv.functor :=
{ id_map := @equiv.id_map _ _,
comp_map := @equiv.comp_map _ _ }
protected lemma is_lawful_functor' [F : _root_.functor t']
(h₀ : ∀ {α β} (f : α → β), _root_.functor.map f = equiv.map f)
(h₁ : ∀ {α β} (f : β), _root_.functor.map_const f = (equiv.map ∘ function.const α) f) :
_root_.is_lawful_functor t' :=
begin
have : F = equiv.functor,
{ casesI F, dsimp [equiv.functor],
congr; ext; [rw ← h₀, rw ← h₁] },
substI this,
exact equiv.is_lawful_functor
end
end functor
section traversable
parameters {t t' : Type u → Type u}
parameters (eqv : Π α, t α ≃ t' α)
variables [traversable t]
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [applicative m]
variables {α β : Type u}
/-- Like `equiv.map`, a function `t' : Type u → Type u` can be given
the structure of a traversable functor using a traversable functor
`t'` and equivalences `t α ≃ t' α` for all α. See `equiv.traversable`. -/
protected def traverse (f : α → m β) (x : t' α) : m (t' β) :=
eqv β <$> traverse f ((eqv α).symm x)
/-- The function `equiv.traverse` transfers a traversable functor
instance across the equivalences `eqv`. -/
protected def traversable : traversable t' :=
{ to_functor := equiv.functor eqv,
traverse := @equiv.traverse _ }
end traversable
section equiv
parameters {t t' : Type u → Type u}
parameters (eqv : Π α, t α ≃ t' α)
variables [traversable t] [is_lawful_traversable t]
variables {F G : Type u → Type u} [applicative F] [applicative G]
variables [is_lawful_applicative F] [is_lawful_applicative G]
variables (η : applicative_transformation F G)
variables {α β γ : Type u}
open is_lawful_traversable functor
protected lemma id_traverse (x : t' α) :
equiv.traverse eqv id.mk x = x :=
by simp! [equiv.traverse,id_bind,id_traverse,functor.map] with functor_norm
protected lemma traverse_eq_map_id (f : α → β) (x : t' α) :
equiv.traverse eqv (id.mk ∘ f) x = id.mk (equiv.map eqv f x) :=
by simp [equiv.traverse, traverse_eq_map_id] with functor_norm; refl
protected lemma comp_traverse (f : β → F γ) (g : α → G β) (x : t' α) :
equiv.traverse eqv (comp.mk ∘ functor.map f ∘ g) x =
comp.mk (equiv.traverse eqv f <$> equiv.traverse eqv g x) :=
by simp [equiv.traverse,comp_traverse] with functor_norm; congr; ext; simp
protected lemma naturality (f : α → F β) (x : t' α) :
η (equiv.traverse eqv f x) = equiv.traverse eqv (@η _ ∘ f) x :=
by simp only [equiv.traverse] with functor_norm
/-- The fact that `t` is a lawful traversable functor carries over the
equivalences to `t'`, with the traversable functor structure given by
`equiv.traversable`. -/
protected def is_lawful_traversable : @is_lawful_traversable t' (equiv.traversable eqv) :=
{ to_is_lawful_functor := @equiv.is_lawful_functor _ _ eqv _ _,
id_traverse := @equiv.id_traverse _ _,
comp_traverse := @equiv.comp_traverse _ _,
traverse_eq_map_id := @equiv.traverse_eq_map_id _ _,
naturality := @equiv.naturality _ _ }
/-- If the `traversable t'` instance has the properties that `map`,
`map_const`, and `traverse` are equal to the ones that come from
carrying the traversable functor structure from `t` over the
equivalences, then the fact that `t` is a lawful traversable functor
carries over as well. -/
protected def is_lawful_traversable' [_i : traversable t']
(h₀ : ∀ {α β} (f : α → β),
map f = equiv.map eqv f)
(h₁ : ∀ {α β} (f : β),
map_const f = (equiv.map eqv ∘ function.const α) f)
(h₂ : ∀ {F : Type u → Type u} [applicative F],
by exactI ∀ [is_lawful_applicative F]
{α β} (f : α → F β),
traverse f = equiv.traverse eqv f) :
_root_.is_lawful_traversable t' :=
begin
-- we can't use the same approach as for `is_lawful_functor'` because
-- h₂ needs a `is_lawful_applicative` assumption
refine {to_is_lawful_functor :=
equiv.is_lawful_functor' eqv @h₀ @h₁, ..}; introsI,
{ rw [h₂, equiv.id_traverse], apply_instance },
{ rw [h₂, equiv.comp_traverse f g x, h₂], congr,
rw [h₂], all_goals { apply_instance } },
{ rw [h₂, equiv.traverse_eq_map_id, h₀]; apply_instance },
{ rw [h₂, equiv.naturality, h₂]; apply_instance }
end
end equiv
end equiv
|
b3eea4434cd706b0e3bac5c2bfff14f388dec0dc | 206422fb9edabf63def0ed2aa3f489150fb09ccb | /src/data/int/basic.lean | 73582ab76bcc4e555e73b0af696bc463227291ef | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hamdysalah1/mathlib | b915f86b2503feeae268de369f1b16932321f097 | 95454452f6b3569bf967d35aab8d852b1ddf8017 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,154,116,545 | 1,611,797,994,000 | 1,611,797,994,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 52,085 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
The integers, with addition, multiplication, and subtraction.
-/
import data.nat.basic
import algebra.order_functions
open nat
namespace int
instance : inhabited ℤ := ⟨int.zero⟩
instance : nontrivial ℤ :=
⟨⟨0, 1, int.zero_ne_one⟩⟩
instance : comm_ring int :=
{ add := int.add,
add_assoc := int.add_assoc,
zero := int.zero,
zero_add := int.zero_add,
add_zero := int.add_zero,
neg := int.neg,
add_left_neg := int.add_left_neg,
add_comm := int.add_comm,
mul := int.mul,
mul_assoc := int.mul_assoc,
one := int.one,
one_mul := int.one_mul,
mul_one := int.mul_one,
sub := int.sub,
left_distrib := int.distrib_left,
right_distrib := int.distrib_right,
mul_comm := int.mul_comm }
/-! ### Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
-- instance : has_sub int := by apply_instance -- This is in core
instance : add_comm_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : add_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : add_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semiring int := by apply_instance
instance : semiring int := by apply_instance
instance : ring int := by apply_instance
instance : distrib int := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_comm_ring int :=
{ add_le_add_left := @int.add_le_add_left,
mul_pos := @int.mul_pos,
zero_le_one := le_of_lt int.zero_lt_one,
.. int.comm_ring, .. int.linear_order, .. int.nontrivial }
instance : linear_ordered_add_comm_group int :=
by apply_instance
theorem abs_eq_nat_abs : ∀ a : ℤ, abs a = nat_abs a
| (n : ℕ) := abs_of_nonneg $ coe_zero_le _
| -[1+ n] := abs_of_nonpos $ le_of_lt $ neg_succ_lt_zero _
theorem nat_abs_abs (a : ℤ) : nat_abs (abs a) = nat_abs a :=
by rw [abs_eq_nat_abs]; refl
theorem sign_mul_abs (a : ℤ) : sign a * abs a = a :=
by rw [abs_eq_nat_abs, sign_mul_nat_abs]
@[simp] lemma default_eq_zero : default ℤ = 0 := rfl
meta instance : has_to_format ℤ := ⟨λ z, to_string z⟩
meta instance : has_reflect ℤ := by tactic.mk_has_reflect_instance
attribute [simp] int.coe_nat_add int.coe_nat_mul int.coe_nat_zero int.coe_nat_one int.coe_nat_succ
attribute [simp] int.of_nat_eq_coe int.bodd
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b : ℤ} : int.add a b = a + b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b : ℤ} : int.mul a b = a * b := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_nat_mul_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : (m : ℤ) * -[1+ n] = -(m * succ n) := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_succ_mul_coe_nat (m n : ℕ) : -[1+ m] * n = -(succ m * n) := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_succ_mul_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : -[1+ m] * -[1+ n] = succ m * succ n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nat_le {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) ≤ ↑n ↔ m ≤ n := coe_nat_le_coe_nat_iff m n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nat_lt {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) < ↑n ↔ m < n := coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_iff m n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nat_inj' {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) = ↑n ↔ m = n := int.coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff m n
@[simp] theorem coe_nat_pos {n : ℕ} : (0 : ℤ) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw [← int.coe_nat_zero, coe_nat_lt]
@[simp] theorem coe_nat_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ℤ) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by rw [← int.coe_nat_zero, coe_nat_inj']
theorem coe_nat_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ℤ) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr coe_nat_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma coe_nat_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ (n : ℤ) := coe_nat_le.2 (nat.zero_le _)
lemma coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos {n : ℕ} : (n : ℤ) ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < n :=
⟨λ h, nat.pos_of_ne_zero (coe_nat_ne_zero.1 h),
λ h, (ne_of_lt (coe_nat_lt.2 h)).symm⟩
lemma coe_nat_succ_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n.succ : ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (succ_pos n)
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_abs (n : ℕ) : abs (n : ℤ) = n :=
abs_of_nonneg (coe_nat_nonneg n)
/-! ### succ and pred -/
/-- Immediate successor of an integer: `succ n = n + 1` -/
def succ (a : ℤ) := a + 1
/-- Immediate predecessor of an integer: `pred n = n - 1` -/
def pred (a : ℤ) := a - 1
theorem nat_succ_eq_int_succ (n : ℕ) : (nat.succ n : ℤ) = int.succ n := rfl
theorem pred_succ (a : ℤ) : pred (succ a) = a := add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem succ_pred (a : ℤ) : succ (pred a) = a := sub_add_cancel _ _
theorem neg_succ (a : ℤ) : -succ a = pred (-a) := neg_add _ _
theorem succ_neg_succ (a : ℤ) : succ (-succ a) = -a :=
by rw [neg_succ, succ_pred]
theorem neg_pred (a : ℤ) : -pred a = succ (-a) :=
by rw [eq_neg_of_eq_neg (neg_succ (-a)).symm, neg_neg]
theorem pred_neg_pred (a : ℤ) : pred (-pred a) = -a :=
by rw [neg_pred, pred_succ]
theorem pred_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : pred (nat.succ n) = n := pred_succ n
theorem neg_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : -(nat.succ n : ℤ) = pred (-n) := neg_succ n
theorem succ_neg_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : succ (-nat.succ n) = -n := succ_neg_succ n
theorem lt_succ_self (a : ℤ) : a < succ a :=
lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one
theorem pred_self_lt (a : ℤ) : pred a < a :=
sub_lt_self _ zero_lt_one
theorem add_one_le_iff {a b : ℤ} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b := iff.rfl
theorem lt_add_one_iff {a b : ℤ} : a < b + 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
@add_le_add_iff_right _ _ a b 1
lemma le_add_one {a b : ℤ} (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b + 1 :=
le_of_lt (int.lt_add_one_iff.mpr h)
theorem sub_one_lt_iff {a b : ℤ} : a - 1 < b ↔ a ≤ b :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.trans lt_add_one_iff
theorem le_sub_one_iff {a b : ℤ} : a ≤ b - 1 ↔ a < b :=
le_sub_iff_add_le
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma induction_on {p : ℤ → Prop}
(i : ℤ) (hz : p 0) (hp : ∀i : ℕ, p i → p (i + 1)) (hn : ∀i : ℕ, p (-i) → p (-i - 1)) : p i :=
begin
induction i,
{ induction i,
{ exact hz },
{ exact hp _ i_ih } },
{ have : ∀n:ℕ, p (- n),
{ intro n, induction n,
{ simp [hz] },
{ convert hn _ n_ih using 1, simp [sub_eq_neg_add] } },
exact this (i + 1) }
end
/-- Inductively define a function on `ℤ` by defining it at `b`, for the `succ` of a number greater
than `b`, and the `pred` of a number less than `b`. -/
protected def induction_on' {C : ℤ → Sort*} (z : ℤ) (b : ℤ) :
C b → (∀ k, b ≤ k → C k → C (k + 1)) → (∀ k ≤ b, C k → C (k - 1)) → C z :=
λ H0 Hs Hp,
begin
rw ←sub_add_cancel z b,
induction (z - b) with n n,
{ induction n with n ih, { rwa [of_nat_zero, zero_add] },
rw [of_nat_succ, add_assoc, add_comm 1 b, ←add_assoc],
exact Hs _ (le_add_of_nonneg_left (of_nat_nonneg _)) ih },
{ induction n with n ih,
{ rw [neg_succ_of_nat_eq, ←of_nat_eq_coe, of_nat_zero, zero_add, neg_add_eq_sub],
exact Hp _ (le_refl _) H0 },
{ rw [neg_succ_of_nat_coe', nat.succ_eq_add_one, ←neg_succ_of_nat_coe, sub_add_eq_add_sub],
exact Hp _ (le_of_lt (add_lt_of_neg_of_le (neg_succ_lt_zero _) (le_refl _))) ih } }
end
/-! ### nat abs -/
attribute [simp] nat_abs nat_abs_of_nat nat_abs_zero nat_abs_one
theorem nat_abs_add_le (a b : ℤ) : nat_abs (a + b) ≤ nat_abs a + nat_abs b :=
begin
have : ∀ (a b : ℕ), nat_abs (sub_nat_nat a (nat.succ b)) ≤ nat.succ (a + b),
{ refine (λ a b : ℕ, sub_nat_nat_elim a b.succ
(λ m n i, n = b.succ → nat_abs i ≤ (m + b).succ) _ _ rfl);
intros i n e,
{ subst e, rw [add_comm _ i, add_assoc],
exact nat.le_add_right i (b.succ + b).succ },
{ apply succ_le_succ,
rw [← succ.inj e, ← add_assoc, add_comm],
apply nat.le_add_right } },
cases a; cases b with b b; simp [nat_abs, nat.succ_add];
try {refl}; [skip, rw add_comm a b]; apply this
end
theorem nat_abs_neg_of_nat (n : ℕ) : nat_abs (neg_of_nat n) = n :=
by cases n; refl
theorem nat_abs_mul (a b : ℤ) : nat_abs (a * b) = (nat_abs a) * (nat_abs b) :=
by cases a; cases b;
simp only [← int.mul_def, int.mul, nat_abs_neg_of_nat, eq_self_iff_true, int.nat_abs]
lemma nat_abs_mul_nat_abs_eq {a b : ℤ} {c : ℕ} (h : a * b = (c : ℤ)) :
a.nat_abs * b.nat_abs = c :=
by rw [← nat_abs_mul, h, nat_abs_of_nat]
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_mul_self' (a : ℤ) : (nat_abs a * nat_abs a : ℤ) = a * a :=
by rw [← int.coe_nat_mul, nat_abs_mul_self]
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_eq' (m : ℕ) : -[1+ m] = -m - 1 :=
by simp [neg_succ_of_nat_eq, sub_eq_neg_add]
lemma nat_abs_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : z.nat_abs ≠ 0 :=
λ h, hz $ int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero h
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_eq_zero {a : ℤ} : a.nat_abs = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma nat_abs_lt_nat_abs_of_nonneg_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (w₁ : 0 ≤ a) (w₂ : a < b) :
a.nat_abs < b.nat_abs :=
begin
lift b to ℕ using le_trans w₁ (le_of_lt w₂),
lift a to ℕ using w₁,
simpa using w₂,
end
lemma nat_abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs = b.nat_abs ↔ a * a = b * b :=
begin
rw [← abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
exact int.coe_nat_inj'.symm
end
lemma nat_abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs < b.nat_abs ↔ a * a < b * b :=
begin
rw [← abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
exact int.coe_nat_lt.symm
end
lemma nat_abs_le_iff_mul_self_le {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs ≤ b.nat_abs ↔ a * a ≤ b * b :=
begin
rw [← abs_le_iff_mul_self_le, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
exact int.coe_nat_le.symm
end
lemma nat_abs_eq_iff_sq_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs = b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [pow_two, pow_two], exact nat_abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq }
lemma nat_abs_lt_iff_sq_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs < b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [pow_two, pow_two], exact nat_abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt }
lemma nat_abs_le_iff_sq_le {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs ≤ b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [pow_two, pow_two], exact nat_abs_le_iff_mul_self_le }
/-! ### `/` -/
@[simp] theorem of_nat_div (m n : ℕ) : of_nat (m / n) = (of_nat m) / (of_nat n) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : ℤ) = m / n := rfl
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_div (m : ℕ) {b : ℤ} (H : 0 < b) :
-[1+m] / b = -(m / b + 1) :=
match b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H with ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := rfl end
@[simp] protected theorem div_neg : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a / -b = -(a / b)
| (m : ℕ) 0 := show of_nat (m / 0) = -(m / 0 : ℕ), by rw nat.div_zero; refl
| (m : ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| 0 -[1+ n] := rfl
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := (neg_neg _).symm
| -[1+ m] 0 := rfl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := rfl
theorem div_of_neg_of_pos {a b : ℤ} (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : 0 < b) : a / b = -((-a - 1) / b + 1) :=
match a, b, eq_neg_succ_of_lt_zero Ha, eq_succ_of_zero_lt Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ :=
by change (- -[1+ m] : ℤ) with (m+1 : ℤ); rw add_sub_cancel; refl
end
protected theorem div_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a / b :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le Ha, eq_coe_of_zero_le Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := coe_zero_le _
end
protected theorem div_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : b ≤ 0) : a / b ≤ 0 :=
nonpos_of_neg_nonneg $ by rw [← int.div_neg]; exact int.div_nonneg Ha (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos Hb)
theorem div_neg' {a b : ℤ} (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 0 :=
match a, b, eq_neg_succ_of_lt_zero Ha, eq_succ_of_zero_lt Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := neg_succ_lt_zero _
end
-- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
protected theorem zero_div : ∀ (b : ℤ), 0 / b = 0
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ n] := rfl
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
protected theorem div_zero : ∀ (a : ℤ), a / 0 = 0
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ n] := rfl
@[simp] protected theorem div_one : ∀ (a : ℤ), a / 1 = a
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.div_one _)
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat (nat.div_one _)
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < b) : a / b = 0 :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le H1, eq_succ_of_zero_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt H1 H2), H2 with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H2 :=
congr_arg of_nat $ nat.div_eq_of_lt $ lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat H2
end
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt_abs {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < abs b) : a / b = 0 :=
match b, abs b, abs_eq_nat_abs b, H2 with
| (n : ℕ), ._, rfl, H2 := div_eq_zero_of_lt H1 H2
| -[1+ n], ._, rfl, H2 := neg_injective $ by rw [← int.div_neg]; exact div_eq_zero_of_lt H1 H2
end
protected theorem add_mul_div_right (a b : ℤ) {c : ℤ} (H : c ≠ 0) :
(a + b * c) / c = a / c + b :=
have ∀ {k n : ℕ} {a : ℤ}, (a + n * k.succ) / k.succ = a / k.succ + n, from
λ k n a, match a with
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ k.succ_pos
| -[1+ m] := show ((n * k.succ:ℕ) - m.succ : ℤ) / k.succ =
n - (m / k.succ + 1 : ℕ), begin
cases lt_or_ge m (n*k.succ) with h h,
{ rw [← int.coe_nat_sub h,
← int.coe_nat_sub ((nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ k.succ_pos).2 h)],
apply congr_arg of_nat,
rw [mul_comm, nat.mul_sub_div], rwa mul_comm },
{ change (↑(n * nat.succ k) - (m + 1) : ℤ) / ↑(nat.succ k) =
↑n - ((m / nat.succ k : ℕ) + 1),
rw [← sub_sub, ← sub_sub, ← neg_sub (m:ℤ), ← neg_sub _ (n:ℤ),
← int.coe_nat_sub h,
← int.coe_nat_sub ((nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ k.succ_pos).2 h),
← neg_succ_of_nat_coe', ← neg_succ_of_nat_coe'],
{ apply congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat,
rw [mul_comm, nat.sub_mul_div], rwa mul_comm } }
end
end,
have ∀ {a b c : ℤ}, 0 < c → (a + b * c) / c = a / c + b, from
λ a b c H, match c, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H, b with
| ._, ⟨k, rfl⟩, (n : ℕ) := this
| ._, ⟨k, rfl⟩, -[1+ n] :=
show (a - n.succ * k.succ) / k.succ = (a / k.succ) - n.succ, from
eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by rw [← this, sub_add_cancel]
end,
match lt_trichotomy c 0 with
| or.inl hlt := neg_inj.1 $ by rw [← int.div_neg, neg_add, ← int.div_neg, ← neg_mul_neg];
apply this (neg_pos_of_neg hlt)
| or.inr (or.inl heq) := absurd heq H
| or.inr (or.inr hgt) := this hgt
end
protected theorem add_mul_div_left (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (H : b ≠ 0) :
(a + b * c) / b = a / b + c :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ H]
protected theorem add_div_of_dvd_right {a b c : ℤ} (H : c ∣ b) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
begin
by_cases h1 : c = 0,
{ simp [h1] },
cases H with k hk,
rw hk,
change c ≠ 0 at h1,
rw [mul_comm c k, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ h1, ←zero_add (k * c), int.add_mul_div_right _ _ h1,
int.zero_div, zero_add]
end
protected theorem add_div_of_dvd_left {a b c : ℤ} (H : c ∣ a) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
by rw [add_comm, int.add_div_of_dvd_right H, add_comm]
@[simp] protected theorem mul_div_cancel (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a * b / b = a :=
by have := int.add_mul_div_right 0 a H;
rwa [zero_add, int.zero_div, zero_add] at this
@[simp] protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left {a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (H : a ≠ 0) : a * b / a = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.mul_div_cancel _ H]
@[simp] protected theorem div_self {a : ℤ} (H : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 :=
by have := int.mul_div_cancel 1 H; rwa one_mul at this
/-! ### mod -/
theorem of_nat_mod (m n : nat) : (m % n : ℤ) = of_nat (m % n) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_mod (m n : ℕ) : (↑(m % n) : ℤ) = ↑m % ↑n := rfl
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_mod (m : ℕ) {b : ℤ} (bpos : 0 < b) :
-[1+m] % b = b - 1 - m % b :=
by rw [sub_sub, add_comm]; exact
match b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt bpos with ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := rfl end
@[simp] theorem mod_neg : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a % -b = a % b
| (m : ℕ) n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λ i, ↑(m % i)) (nat_abs_neg _)
| -[1+ m] n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λ i, sub_nat_nat i (nat.succ (m % i))) (nat_abs_neg _)
@[simp] theorem mod_abs (a b : ℤ) : a % (abs b) = a % b :=
abs_by_cases (λ i, a % i = a % b) rfl (mod_neg _ _)
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
theorem zero_mod (b : ℤ) : 0 % b = 0 :=
congr_arg of_nat $ nat.zero_mod _
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
theorem mod_zero : ∀ (a : ℤ), a % 0 = a
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_zero _
| -[1+ m] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $ nat.mod_zero _
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
theorem mod_one : ∀ (a : ℤ), a % 1 = 0
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_one _
| -[1+ m] := show (1 - (m % 1).succ : ℤ) = 0, by rw nat.mod_one; refl
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < b) : a % b = a :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le H1, eq_coe_of_zero_le (le_trans H1 (le_of_lt H2)), H2 with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H2 :=
congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat H2)
end
theorem mod_nonneg : ∀ (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ}, b ≠ 0 → 0 ≤ a % b
| (m : ℕ) n H := coe_zero_le _
| -[1+ m] n H :=
sub_nonneg_of_le $ coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le $ nat.mod_lt _ (nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero H)
theorem mod_lt_of_pos (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : 0 < b) : a % b < b :=
match a, b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H with
| (m : ℕ), ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt (nat.mod_lt _ (nat.succ_pos _))
| -[1+ m], ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := sub_lt_self _ (coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt $ nat.succ_pos _)
end
theorem mod_lt (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a % b < abs b :=
by rw [← mod_abs]; exact mod_lt_of_pos _ (abs_pos.2 H)
theorem mod_add_div_aux (m n : ℕ) : (n - (m % n + 1) - (n * (m / n) + n) : ℤ) = -[1+ m] :=
begin
rw [← sub_sub, neg_succ_of_nat_coe, sub_sub (n:ℤ)],
apply eq_neg_of_eq_neg,
rw [neg_sub, sub_sub_self, add_right_comm],
exact @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λi, (i + 1 : ℤ)) (nat.mod_add_div _ _).symm
end
theorem mod_add_div : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a % b + b * (a / b) = a
| (m : ℕ) 0 := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| (m : ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| 0 -[1+ n] := rfl
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := show (_ + -(n+1) * -((m + 1) / (n + 1) : ℕ) : ℤ) = _,
by rw [neg_mul_neg]; exact congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| -[1+ m] 0 := by rw [mod_zero, int.div_zero]; refl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := mod_add_div_aux m n.succ
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := mod_add_div_aux m n.succ
theorem div_add_mod (a b : ℤ) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (mod_add_div _ _)
theorem mod_def (a b : ℤ) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq (mod_add_div _ _)
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self {a b c : ℤ} : (a + b * c) % c = a % c :=
if cz : c = 0 then by rw [cz, mul_zero, add_zero] else
by rw [mod_def, mod_def, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ cz,
mul_add, mul_comm, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self_left (a b c : ℤ) : (a + b * c) % b = a % b :=
by rw [mul_comm, add_mul_mod_self]
@[simp] theorem add_mod_self {a b : ℤ} : (a + b) % b = a % b :=
by have := add_mul_mod_self_left a b 1; rwa mul_one at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_self_left {a b : ℤ} : (a + b) % a = b % a :=
by rw [add_comm, add_mod_self]
@[simp] theorem mod_add_mod (m n k : ℤ) : (m % n + k) % n = (m + k) % n :=
by have := (add_mul_mod_self_left (m % n + k) n (m / n)).symm;
rwa [add_right_comm, mod_add_div] at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_mod (m n k : ℤ) : (m + n % k) % k = (m + n) % k :=
by rw [add_comm, mod_add_mod, add_comm]
lemma add_mod (a b n : ℤ) : (a + b) % n = ((a % n) + (b % n)) % n :=
by rw [add_mod_mod, mod_add_mod]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_right {m n k : ℤ} (i : ℤ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(m + i) % n = (k + i) % n :=
by rw [← mod_add_mod, ← mod_add_mod k, H]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_left {m n k : ℤ} (i : ℤ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _ H, add_comm]
theorem mod_add_cancel_right {m n k : ℤ} (i) : (m + i) % n = (k + i) % n ↔
m % n = k % n :=
⟨λ H, by have := add_mod_eq_add_mod_right (-i) H;
rwa [add_neg_cancel_right, add_neg_cancel_right] at this,
add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _⟩
theorem mod_add_cancel_left {m n k i : ℤ} :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n ↔ m % n = k % n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_comm i, mod_add_cancel_right]
theorem mod_sub_cancel_right {m n k : ℤ} (i) : (m - i) % n = (k - i) % n ↔
m % n = k % n :=
mod_add_cancel_right _
theorem mod_eq_mod_iff_mod_sub_eq_zero {m n k : ℤ} : m % n = k % n ↔ (m - k) % n = 0 :=
(mod_sub_cancel_right k).symm.trans $ by simp
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_left (a b : ℤ) : (a * b) % b = 0 :=
by rw [← zero_add (a * b), add_mul_mod_self, zero_mod]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_right (a b : ℤ) : (a * b) % a = 0 :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_mod_left]
lemma mul_mod (a b n : ℤ) : (a * b) % n = ((a % n) * (b % n)) % n :=
begin
conv_lhs {
rw [←mod_add_div a n, ←mod_add_div b n, right_distrib, left_distrib, left_distrib,
mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ←left_distrib n _ _, add_mul_mod_self_left,
mul_comm _ (n * (b / n)), mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left] }
end
@[simp] lemma neg_mod_two (i : ℤ) : (-i) % 2 = i % 2 :=
begin
apply int.mod_eq_mod_iff_mod_sub_eq_zero.mpr,
convert int.mul_mod_right 2 (-i),
simp only [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
end
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
theorem mod_self {a : ℤ} : a % a = 0 :=
by have := mul_mod_left 1 a; rwa one_mul at this
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (n : int) {m k : int} (h : m ∣ k) : n % k % m = n % m :=
begin
conv { to_rhs, rw ←mod_add_div n k },
rcases h with ⟨t, rfl⟩, rw [mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
end
@[simp] theorem mod_mod (a b : ℤ) : a % b % b = a % b :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← mod_add_div a b, add_mul_mod_self_left]}
lemma sub_mod (a b n : ℤ) : (a - b) % n = ((a % n) - (b % n)) % n :=
begin
apply (mod_add_cancel_right b).mp,
rw [sub_add_cancel, ← add_mod_mod, sub_add_cancel, mod_mod]
end
/-! ### properties of `/` and `%` -/
@[simp] theorem mul_div_mul_of_pos {a : ℤ} (b c : ℤ) (H : 0 < a) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c :=
suffices ∀ (m k : ℕ) (b : ℤ), (m.succ * b / (m.succ * k) : ℤ) = b / k, from
match a, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H, c, eq_coe_or_neg c with
| ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ._, ⟨k, or.inl rfl⟩ := this _ _ _
| ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ._, ⟨k, or.inr rfl⟩ :=
by rw [← neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, int.div_neg, int.div_neg];
apply congr_arg has_neg.neg; apply this
end,
λ m k b, match b, k with
| (n : ℕ), k := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mul_div_mul _ _ m.succ_pos)
| -[1+ n], 0 := by rw [int.coe_nat_zero, mul_zero, int.div_zero, int.div_zero]
| -[1+ n], k+1 := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
show (m.succ * n + m) / (m.succ * k.succ) = n / k.succ, begin
apply nat.div_eq_of_lt_le,
{ refine le_trans _ (nat.le_add_right _ _),
rw [← nat.mul_div_mul _ _ m.succ_pos],
apply nat.div_mul_le_self },
{ change m.succ * n.succ ≤ _,
rw [mul_left_comm],
apply nat.mul_le_mul_left,
apply (nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ k.succ_pos).1,
apply nat.lt_succ_self }
end
end
@[simp] theorem mul_div_mul_of_pos_left (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (H : 0 < b) :
a * b / (c * b) = a / c :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_comm c, mul_div_mul_of_pos _ _ H]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_mul_of_pos {a : ℤ} (b c : ℤ) (H : 0 < a) : a * b % (a * c) = a * (b % c) :=
by rw [mod_def, mod_def, mul_div_mul_of_pos _ _ H, mul_sub_left_distrib, mul_assoc]
theorem lt_div_add_one_mul_self (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : 0 < b) : a < (a / b + 1) * b :=
by { rw [add_mul, one_mul, mul_comm, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← mod_def],
exact mod_lt_of_pos _ H }
theorem abs_div_le_abs : ∀ (a b : ℤ), abs (a / b) ≤ abs a :=
suffices ∀ (a : ℤ) (n : ℕ), abs (a / n) ≤ abs a, from
λ a b, match b, eq_coe_or_neg b with
| ._, ⟨n, or.inl rfl⟩ := this _ _
| ._, ⟨n, or.inr rfl⟩ := by rw [int.div_neg, abs_neg]; apply this
end,
λ a n, by rw [abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs]; exact
coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le (match a, n with
| (m : ℕ), n := nat.div_le_self _ _
| -[1+ m], 0 := nat.zero_le _
| -[1+ m], n+1 := nat.succ_le_succ (nat.div_le_self _ _)
end)
theorem div_le_self {a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (Ha : 0 ≤ a) : a / b ≤ a :=
by have := le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_div_le_abs a b);
rwa [abs_of_nonneg Ha] at this
theorem mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : a % b = 0) : b * (a / b) = a :=
by have := mod_add_div a b; rwa [H, zero_add] at this
theorem div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : a % b = 0) : a / b * b = a :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero H]
lemma mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (n : ℤ) : n % 2 = 0 ∨ n % 2 = 1 :=
have h : n % 2 < 2 := abs_of_nonneg (show 0 ≤ (2 : ℤ), from dec_trivial) ▸ int.mod_lt _ dec_trivial,
have h₁ : 0 ≤ n % 2 := int.mod_nonneg _ dec_trivial,
match (n % 2), h, h₁ with
| (0 : ℕ) := λ _ _, or.inl rfl
| (1 : ℕ) := λ _ _, or.inr rfl
| (k + 2 : ℕ) := λ h _, absurd h dec_trivial
| -[1+ a] := λ _ h₁, absurd h₁ dec_trivial
end
/-! ### dvd -/
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_dvd {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) ∣ ↑n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨λ ⟨a, ae⟩, m.eq_zero_or_pos.elim
(λm0, by simp [m0] at ae; simp [ae, m0])
(λm0l, by {
cases eq_coe_of_zero_le (@nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left ℤ _ m a
(by simp [ae.symm]) (by simpa using m0l)) with k e,
subst a, exact ⟨k, int.coe_nat_inj ae⟩ }),
λ ⟨k, e⟩, dvd.intro k $ by rw [e, int.coe_nat_mul]⟩
theorem coe_nat_dvd_left {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ} : (↑n : ℤ) ∣ z ↔ n ∣ z.nat_abs :=
by rcases nat_abs_eq z with eq | eq; rw eq; simp [coe_nat_dvd]
theorem coe_nat_dvd_right {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ} : z ∣ (↑n : ℤ) ↔ z.nat_abs ∣ n :=
by rcases nat_abs_eq z with eq | eq; rw eq; simp [coe_nat_dvd]
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : 0 ≤ b) : a ∣ b → b ∣ a → a = b :=
begin
rw [← abs_of_nonneg H1, ← abs_of_nonneg H2, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
rw [coe_nat_dvd, coe_nat_dvd, coe_nat_inj'],
apply nat.dvd_antisymm
end
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : b % a = 0) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b / a, (mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero H).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ℤ}, a ∣ b → b % a = 0
| a ._ ⟨c, rfl⟩ := mul_mod_right _ _
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero (a b : ℤ) : a ∣ b ↔ b % a = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
/-- If `a % b = c` then `b` divides `a - c`. -/
lemma dvd_sub_of_mod_eq {a b c : ℤ} (h : a % b = c) : b ∣ a - c :=
begin
have hx : a % b % b = c % b, { rw h },
rw [mod_mod, ←mod_sub_cancel_right c, sub_self, zero_mod] at hx,
exact dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hx
end
theorem nat_abs_dvd {a b : ℤ} : (a.nat_abs : ℤ) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
(nat_abs_eq a).elim (λ e, by rw ← e) (λ e, by rw [← neg_dvd_iff_dvd, ← e])
theorem dvd_nat_abs {a b : ℤ} : a ∣ b.nat_abs ↔ a ∣ b :=
(nat_abs_eq b).elim (λ e, by rw ← e) (λ e, by rw [← dvd_neg_iff_dvd, ← e])
instance decidable_dvd : @decidable_rel ℤ (∣) :=
assume a n, decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by apply_instance) (dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).symm
protected theorem div_mul_cancel {a b : ℤ} (H : b ∣ a) : a / b * b = a :=
div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero (mod_eq_zero_of_dvd H)
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {a b : ℤ} (H : a ∣ b) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.div_mul_cancel H]
protected theorem mul_div_assoc (a : ℤ) : ∀ {b c : ℤ}, c ∣ b → (a * b) / c = a * (b / c)
| ._ c ⟨d, rfl⟩ := if cz : c = 0 then by simp [cz] else
by rw [mul_left_comm, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ cz, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ cz]
protected theorem mul_div_assoc' (b : ℤ) {a c : ℤ} (h : c ∣ a) : a * b / c = a / c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.mul_div_assoc _ h, mul_comm]
theorem div_dvd_div : ∀ {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : a ∣ b) (H2 : b ∣ c), b / a ∣ c / a
| a ._ ._ ⟨b, rfl⟩ ⟨c, rfl⟩ := if az : a = 0 then by simp [az] else
by rw [int.mul_div_cancel_left _ az, mul_assoc, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ az];
apply dvd_mul_right
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c :=
by rw [← H2, int.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ≠ 0) (H2 : a = b * c) :
a / b = c :=
by rw [H2, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
protected theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : a ≠ 0) (H2 : a * b = c) :
b = c / a :=
eq.symm $ int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H1 H2.symm
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
⟨int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = c * b :=
by rw mul_comm; exact int.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_left {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H1 H2]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ≠ 0) (H2 : a = c * b) :
a / b = c :=
int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H1 (by rw [mul_comm, H2])
theorem neg_div_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ℤ} (H : b ∣ a), -a / b = -(a / b)
| ._ b ⟨c, rfl⟩ := if bz : b = 0 then by simp [bz] else
by rw [neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ bz, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ bz]
lemma sub_div_of_dvd {a b c : ℤ} (hcb : c ∣ b) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
begin
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, int.add_div_of_dvd_right ((dvd_neg c b).mpr hcb)],
congr,
exact neg_div_of_dvd hcb,
end
lemma sub_div_of_dvd_sub {a b c : ℤ} (hcab : c ∣ (a - b)) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
by rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← int.add_div_of_dvd_left hcab, sub_add_cancel]
theorem div_sign : ∀ a b, a / sign b = a * sign b
| a (n+1:ℕ) := by unfold sign; simp
| a 0 := by simp [sign]
| a -[1+ n] := by simp [sign]
@[simp] theorem sign_mul : ∀ a b, sign (a * b) = sign a * sign b
| a 0 := by simp
| 0 b := by simp
| (m+1:ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := rfl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := rfl
protected theorem sign_eq_div_abs (a : ℤ) : sign a = a / (abs a) :=
if az : a = 0 then by simp [az] else
(int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (mt abs_eq_zero.1 az)
(sign_mul_abs _).symm).symm
theorem mul_sign : ∀ (i : ℤ), i * sign i = nat_abs i
| (n+1:ℕ) := mul_one _
| 0 := mul_zero _
| -[1+ n] := mul_neg_one _
theorem le_of_dvd {a b : ℤ} (bpos : 0 < b) (H : a ∣ b) : a ≤ b :=
match a, b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt bpos, H with
| (m : ℕ), ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H := coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le $
nat.le_of_dvd n.succ_pos $ coe_nat_dvd.1 H
| -[1+ m], ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, _ :=
le_trans (le_of_lt $ neg_succ_lt_zero _) (coe_zero_le _)
end
theorem eq_one_of_dvd_one {a : ℤ} (H : 0 ≤ a) (H' : a ∣ 1) : a = 1 :=
match a, eq_coe_of_zero_le H, H' with
| ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H' := congr_arg coe $
nat.eq_one_of_dvd_one $ coe_nat_dvd.1 H'
end
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right {a b : ℤ} (H : 0 ≤ a) (H' : a * b = 1) : a = 1 :=
eq_one_of_dvd_one H ⟨b, H'.symm⟩
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_left {a b : ℤ} (H : 0 ≤ b) (H' : a * b = 1) : b = 1 :=
eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right H (by rw [mul_comm, H'])
lemma of_nat_dvd_of_dvd_nat_abs {a : ℕ} : ∀ {z : ℤ} (haz : a ∣ z.nat_abs), ↑a ∣ z
| (int.of_nat _) haz := int.coe_nat_dvd.2 haz
| -[1+k] haz :=
begin
change ↑a ∣ -(k+1 : ℤ),
apply dvd_neg_of_dvd,
apply int.coe_nat_dvd.2,
exact haz
end
lemma dvd_nat_abs_of_of_nat_dvd {a : ℕ} : ∀ {z : ℤ} (haz : ↑a ∣ z), a ∣ z.nat_abs
| (int.of_nat _) haz := int.coe_nat_dvd.1 (int.dvd_nat_abs.2 haz)
| -[1+k] haz :=
have haz' : (↑a:ℤ) ∣ (↑(k+1):ℤ), from dvd_of_dvd_neg haz,
int.coe_nat_dvd.1 haz'
lemma pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd {p m n : ℕ} {k : ℤ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hdiv : ↑(p ^ n) ∣ k) :
↑(p ^ m) ∣ k :=
begin
induction k,
{ apply int.coe_nat_dvd.2,
apply pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hmn,
apply int.coe_nat_dvd.1 hdiv },
{ change -[1+k] with -(↑(k+1) : ℤ),
apply dvd_neg_of_dvd,
apply int.coe_nat_dvd.2,
apply pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hmn,
apply int.coe_nat_dvd.1,
apply dvd_of_dvd_neg,
exact hdiv }
end
lemma dvd_of_pow_dvd {p k : ℕ} {m : ℤ} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hpk : ↑(p^k) ∣ m) : ↑p ∣ m :=
by rw ←pow_one p; exact pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hk hpk
/-- If `n > 0` then `m` is not divisible by `n` iff it is between `n * k` and `n * (k + 1)`
for some `k`. -/
lemma exists_lt_and_lt_iff_not_dvd (m : ℤ) {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(∃ k, n * k < m ∧ m < n * (k + 1)) ↔ ¬ n ∣ m :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨k, h1k, h2k⟩ ⟨l, rfl⟩, rw [mul_lt_mul_left hn] at h1k h2k,
rw [lt_add_one_iff, ← not_lt] at h2k, exact h2k h1k },
{ intro h, rw [dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, ← ne.def] at h,
have := (mod_nonneg m hn.ne.symm).lt_of_ne h.symm,
simp only [← mod_add_div m n] {single_pass := tt},
refine ⟨m / n, lt_add_of_pos_left _ this, _⟩,
rw [add_comm _ (1 : ℤ), left_distrib, mul_one], exact add_lt_add_right (mod_lt_of_pos _ hn) _ }
end
/-! ### `/` and ordering -/
protected theorem div_mul_le (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a / b * b ≤ a :=
le_of_sub_nonneg $ by rw [mul_comm, ← mod_def]; apply mod_nonneg _ H
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) (H' : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right (le_trans (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H)) H') H
protected theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) (H3 : a < b / c) : a * c < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.div_le_of_le_mul H) (not_le_of_gt H3)
protected theorem mul_le_of_le_div {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 < c) (H2 : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H2 (le_of_lt H1)) (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H1))
protected theorem le_div_of_mul_le {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 < c) (H2 : a * c ≤ b) : a ≤ b / c :=
le_of_lt_add_one $ lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right
(lt_of_le_of_lt H2 (lt_div_add_one_mul_self _ H1)) (le_of_lt H1)
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) : a ≤ b / c ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨int.mul_le_of_le_div H, int.le_div_of_mul_le H⟩
protected theorem div_le_div {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) (H' : a ≤ b) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
int.le_div_of_mul_le H (le_trans (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H)) H')
protected theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) (H' : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.mul_le_of_le_div H) (not_le_of_gt H')
protected theorem lt_mul_of_div_lt {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 < c) (H2 : a / c < b) : a < b * c :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.le_div_of_mul_le H1) (not_le_of_gt H2)
protected theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) : a / c < b ↔ a < b * c :=
⟨int.lt_mul_of_div_lt H, int.div_lt_of_lt_mul H⟩
protected theorem le_mul_of_div_le {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ b) (H2 : b ∣ a) (H3 : a / b ≤ c) :
a ≤ c * b :=
by rw [← int.div_mul_cancel H2]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H3 H1
protected theorem lt_div_of_mul_lt {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ b) (H2 : b ∣ c) (H3 : a * b < c) :
a < c / b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.le_mul_of_div_le H1 H2) (not_le_of_gt H3)
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt {a b : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (H : 0 < c) (H' : c ∣ b) :
a < b / c ↔ a * c < b :=
⟨int.mul_lt_of_lt_div H, int.lt_div_of_mul_lt (le_of_lt H) H'⟩
theorem div_pos_of_pos_of_dvd {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 < a) (H2 : 0 ≤ b) (H3 : b ∣ a) : 0 < a / b :=
int.lt_div_of_mul_lt H2 H3 (by rwa zero_mul)
theorem div_eq_div_of_mul_eq_mul {a b c d : ℤ} (H2 : d ∣ c) (H3 : b ≠ 0)
(H4 : d ≠ 0) (H5 : a * d = b * c) :
a / b = c / d :=
int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H3 $
by rw [← int.mul_div_assoc _ H2]; exact
(int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left H4 H5.symm).symm
theorem eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left {a b c d : ℤ} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hbc : b ∣ c)
(h : b * a = c * d) : a = c / b * d :=
begin
cases hbc with k hk,
subst hk,
rw [int.mul_div_cancel_left _ hb],
rw mul_assoc at h,
apply mul_left_cancel' hb h
end
/-- If an integer with larger absolute value divides an integer, it is
zero. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nat_abs_lt_nat_abs {a b : ℤ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : nat_abs b < nat_abs a) :
b = 0 :=
begin
rw [←nat_abs_dvd, ←dvd_nat_abs, coe_nat_dvd] at w,
rw ←nat_abs_eq_zero,
exact eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt w h
end
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nonneg_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (w₁ : 0 ≤ a) (w₂ : a < b) (h : b ∣ a) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nat_abs_lt_nat_abs h (nat_abs_lt_nat_abs_of_nonneg_of_lt w₁ w₂)
/-- If two integers are congruent to a sufficiently large modulus,
they are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_mod_eq_of_nat_abs_sub_lt_nat_abs {a b c : ℤ} (h1 : a % b = c)
(h2 : nat_abs (a - c) < nat_abs b) :
a = c :=
eq_of_sub_eq_zero (eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nat_abs_lt_nat_abs (dvd_sub_of_mod_eq h1) h2)
theorem of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_lt {m n : ℕ}
(h : m < n.succ) : of_nat m + -[1+n] = -[1+ n - m] :=
begin
change sub_nat_nat _ _ = _,
have h' : n.succ - m = (n - m).succ,
apply succ_sub,
apply le_of_lt_succ h,
simp [*, sub_nat_nat]
end
theorem of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_ge {m n : ℕ}
(h : n.succ ≤ m) : of_nat m + -[1+n] = of_nat (m - n.succ) :=
begin
change sub_nat_nat _ _ = _,
have h' : n.succ - m = 0,
apply sub_eq_zero_of_le h,
simp [*, sub_nat_nat]
end
@[simp] theorem neg_add_neg (m n : ℕ) : -[1+m] + -[1+n] = -[1+nat.succ(m+n)] := rfl
/-! ### to_nat -/
theorem to_nat_eq_max : ∀ (a : ℤ), (to_nat a : ℤ) = max a 0
| (n : ℕ) := (max_eq_left (coe_zero_le n)).symm
| -[1+ n] := (max_eq_right (le_of_lt (neg_succ_lt_zero n))).symm
@[simp] lemma to_nat_zero : (0 : ℤ).to_nat = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_nat_one : (1 : ℤ).to_nat = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem to_nat_of_nonneg {a : ℤ} (h : 0 ≤ a) : (to_nat a : ℤ) = a :=
by rw [to_nat_eq_max, max_eq_left h]
@[simp] lemma to_nat_sub_of_le (a b : ℤ) (h : b ≤ a) : (to_nat (a + -b) : ℤ) = a + - b :=
int.to_nat_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le h)
@[simp] theorem to_nat_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : to_nat ↑n = n := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_nat_coe_nat_add_one {n : ℕ} : ((n : ℤ) + 1).to_nat = n + 1 := rfl
theorem le_to_nat (a : ℤ) : a ≤ to_nat a :=
by rw [to_nat_eq_max]; apply le_max_left
@[simp] theorem to_nat_le {a : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : to_nat a ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n :=
by rw [(coe_nat_le_coe_nat_iff _ _).symm, to_nat_eq_max, max_le_iff];
exact and_iff_left (coe_zero_le _)
@[simp] theorem lt_to_nat {n : ℕ} {a : ℤ} : n < to_nat a ↔ (n : ℤ) < a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 to_nat_le
theorem to_nat_le_to_nat {a b : ℤ} (h : a ≤ b) : to_nat a ≤ to_nat b :=
by rw to_nat_le; exact le_trans h (le_to_nat b)
theorem to_nat_lt_to_nat {a b : ℤ} (hb : 0 < b) : to_nat a < to_nat b ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ h, begin cases a, exact lt_to_nat.1 h, exact lt_trans (neg_succ_of_nat_lt_zero a) hb, end,
λ h, begin rw lt_to_nat, cases a, exact h, exact hb end⟩
theorem lt_of_to_nat_lt {a b : ℤ} (h : to_nat a < to_nat b) : a < b :=
(to_nat_lt_to_nat $ lt_to_nat.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h).1 h
lemma to_nat_add {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(a + b).to_nat = a.to_nat + b.to_nat :=
begin
lift a to ℕ using ha,
lift b to ℕ using hb,
norm_cast,
end
lemma to_nat_add_one {a : ℤ} (h : 0 ≤ a) : (a + 1).to_nat = a.to_nat + 1 :=
to_nat_add h (zero_le_one)
/-- If `n : ℕ`, then `int.to_nat' n = some n`, if `n : ℤ` is negative, then `int.to_nat' n = none`.
-/
def to_nat' : ℤ → option ℕ
| (n : ℕ) := some n
| -[1+ n] := none
theorem mem_to_nat' : ∀ (a : ℤ) (n : ℕ), n ∈ to_nat' a ↔ a = n
| (m : ℕ) n := option.some_inj.trans coe_nat_inj'.symm
| -[1+ m] n := by split; intro h; cases h
lemma to_nat_zero_of_neg : ∀ {z : ℤ}, z < 0 → z.to_nat = 0
| (-[1+n]) _ := rfl
| (int.of_nat n) h := (not_le_of_gt h $ int.of_nat_nonneg n).elim
/-! ### units -/
@[simp] theorem units_nat_abs (u : units ℤ) : nat_abs u = 1 :=
units.ext_iff.1 $ nat.units_eq_one ⟨nat_abs u, nat_abs ↑u⁻¹,
by rw [← nat_abs_mul, units.mul_inv]; refl,
by rw [← nat_abs_mul, units.inv_mul]; refl⟩
theorem units_eq_one_or (u : units ℤ) : u = 1 ∨ u = -1 :=
by simpa only [units.ext_iff, units_nat_abs] using nat_abs_eq u
lemma units_inv_eq_self (u : units ℤ) : u⁻¹ = u :=
(units_eq_one_or u).elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl) (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl)
@[simp] lemma units_mul_self (u : units ℤ) : u * u = 1 :=
(units_eq_one_or u).elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl) (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl)
-- `units.coe_mul` is a "wrong turn" for the simplifier, this undoes it and simplifies further
@[simp] lemma units_coe_mul_self (u : units ℤ) : (u * u : ℤ) = 1 :=
by rw [←units.coe_mul, units_mul_self, units.coe_one]
/-! ### bitwise ops -/
@[simp] lemma bodd_zero : bodd 0 = ff := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_one : bodd 1 = tt := rfl
lemma bodd_two : bodd 2 = ff := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma bodd_coe (n : ℕ) : int.bodd n = nat.bodd n := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_sub_nat_nat (m n : ℕ) : bodd (sub_nat_nat m n) = bxor m.bodd n.bodd :=
by apply sub_nat_nat_elim m n (λ m n i, bodd i = bxor m.bodd n.bodd); intros;
simp; cases i.bodd; simp
@[simp] lemma bodd_neg_of_nat (n : ℕ) : bodd (neg_of_nat n) = n.bodd :=
by cases n; simp; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_neg (n : ℤ) : bodd (-n) = bodd n :=
by cases n; simp [has_neg.neg, int.coe_nat_eq, int.neg, bodd, -of_nat_eq_coe]
@[simp] lemma bodd_add (m n : ℤ) : bodd (m + n) = bxor (bodd m) (bodd n) :=
by cases m with m m; cases n with n n; unfold has_add.add;
simp [int.add, -of_nat_eq_coe, bool.bxor_comm]
@[simp] lemma bodd_mul (m n : ℤ) : bodd (m * n) = bodd m && bodd n :=
by cases m with m m; cases n with n n;
simp [← int.mul_def, int.mul, -of_nat_eq_coe, bool.bxor_comm]
theorem bodd_add_div2 : ∀ n, cond (bodd n) 1 0 + 2 * div2 n = n
| (n : ℕ) :=
by rw [show (cond (bodd n) 1 0 : ℤ) = (cond (bodd n) 1 0 : ℕ),
by cases bodd n; refl]; exact congr_arg of_nat n.bodd_add_div2
| -[1+ n] := begin
refine eq.trans _ (congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat n.bodd_add_div2),
dsimp [bodd], cases nat.bodd n; dsimp [cond, bnot, div2, int.mul],
{ change -[1+ 2 * nat.div2 n] = _, rw zero_add },
{ rw [zero_add, add_comm], refl }
end
theorem div2_val : ∀ n, div2 n = n / 2
| (n : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat n.div2_val
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat n.div2_val
lemma bit0_val (n : ℤ) : bit0 n = 2 * n := (two_mul _).symm
lemma bit1_val (n : ℤ) : bit1 n = 2 * n + 1 := congr_arg (+(1:ℤ)) (bit0_val _)
lemma bit_val (b n) : bit b n = 2 * n + cond b 1 0 :=
by { cases b, apply (bit0_val n).trans (add_zero _).symm, apply bit1_val }
lemma bit_decomp (n : ℤ) : bit (bodd n) (div2 n) = n :=
(bit_val _ _).trans $ (add_comm _ _).trans $ bodd_add_div2 _
/-- Defines a function from `ℤ` conditionally, if it is defined for odd and even integers separately
using `bit`. -/
def {u} bit_cases_on {C : ℤ → Sort u} (n) (h : ∀ b n, C (bit b n)) : C n :=
by rw [← bit_decomp n]; apply h
@[simp] lemma bit_zero : bit ff 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma bit_coe_nat (b) (n : ℕ) : bit b n = nat.bit b n :=
by rw [bit_val, nat.bit_val]; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma bit_neg_succ (b) (n : ℕ) : bit b -[1+ n] = -[1+ nat.bit (bnot b) n] :=
by rw [bit_val, nat.bit_val]; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit (b n) : bodd (bit b n) = b :=
by rw bit_val; simp; cases b; cases bodd n; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit0 (n : ℤ) : bodd (bit0 n) = ff := bodd_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit1 (n : ℤ) : bodd (bit1 n) = tt := bodd_bit tt n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit (b n) : div2 (bit b n) = n :=
begin
rw [bit_val, div2_val, add_comm, int.add_mul_div_left, (_ : (_/2:ℤ) = 0), zero_add],
cases b, all_goals {exact dec_trivial}
end
lemma bit0_ne_bit1 (m n : ℤ) : bit0 m ≠ bit1 n :=
mt (congr_arg bodd) $ by simp
lemma bit1_ne_bit0 (m n : ℤ) : bit1 m ≠ bit0 n :=
(bit0_ne_bit1 _ _).symm
lemma bit1_ne_zero (m : ℤ) : bit1 m ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [bit0_zero] using bit1_ne_bit0 m 0
@[simp] lemma test_bit_zero (b) : ∀ n, test_bit (bit b n) 0 = b
| (n : ℕ) := by rw [bit_coe_nat]; apply nat.test_bit_zero
| -[1+ n] := by rw [bit_neg_succ]; dsimp [test_bit]; rw [nat.test_bit_zero];
clear test_bit_zero; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma test_bit_succ (m b) : ∀ n, test_bit (bit b n) (nat.succ m) = test_bit n m
| (n : ℕ) := by rw [bit_coe_nat]; apply nat.test_bit_succ
| -[1+ n] := by rw [bit_neg_succ]; dsimp [test_bit]; rw [nat.test_bit_succ]
private meta def bitwise_tac : tactic unit := `[
funext m,
funext n,
cases m with m m; cases n with n n; try {refl},
all_goals {
apply congr_arg of_nat <|> apply congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat,
try {dsimp [nat.land, nat.ldiff, nat.lor]},
try {rw [
show nat.bitwise (λ a b, a && bnot b) n m =
nat.bitwise (λ a b, b && bnot a) m n, from
congr_fun (congr_fun (@nat.bitwise_swap (λ a b, b && bnot a) rfl) n) m]},
apply congr_arg (λ f, nat.bitwise f m n),
funext a,
funext b,
cases a; cases b; refl
},
all_goals {unfold nat.land nat.ldiff nat.lor}
]
theorem bitwise_or : bitwise bor = lor := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_and : bitwise band = land := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_diff : bitwise (λ a b, a && bnot b) = ldiff := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_xor : bitwise bxor = lxor := by bitwise_tac
@[simp] lemma bitwise_bit (f : bool → bool → bool) (a m b n) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) :=
begin
cases m with m m; cases n with n n;
repeat { rw [← int.coe_nat_eq] <|> rw bit_coe_nat <|> rw bit_neg_succ };
unfold bitwise nat_bitwise bnot;
[ induction h : f ff ff,
induction h : f ff tt,
induction h : f tt ff,
induction h : f tt tt ],
all_goals {
unfold cond, rw nat.bitwise_bit,
repeat { rw bit_coe_nat <|> rw bit_neg_succ <|> rw bnot_bnot } },
all_goals { unfold bnot {fail_if_unchanged := ff}; rw h; refl }
end
@[simp] lemma lor_bit (a m b n) : lor (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a || b) (lor m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_or, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma land_bit (a m b n) : land (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && b) (land m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_and, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma ldiff_bit (a m b n) : ldiff (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && bnot b) (ldiff m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_diff, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma lxor_bit (a m b n) : lxor (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (bxor a b) (lxor m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_xor, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma lnot_bit (b) : ∀ n, lnot (bit b n) = bit (bnot b) (lnot n)
| (n : ℕ) := by simp [lnot]
| -[1+ n] := by simp [lnot]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_bitwise (f : bool → bool → bool) (m n k) :
test_bit (bitwise f m n) k = f (test_bit m k) (test_bit n k) :=
begin
induction k with k IH generalizing m n;
apply bit_cases_on m; intros a m';
apply bit_cases_on n; intros b n';
rw bitwise_bit,
{ simp [test_bit_zero] },
{ simp [test_bit_succ, IH] }
end
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lor (m n k) : test_bit (lor m n) k = test_bit m k || test_bit n k :=
by rw [← bitwise_or, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_land (m n k) : test_bit (land m n) k = test_bit m k && test_bit n k :=
by rw [← bitwise_and, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp]
lemma test_bit_ldiff (m n k) : test_bit (ldiff m n) k = test_bit m k && bnot (test_bit n k) :=
by rw [← bitwise_diff, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lxor (m n k) : test_bit (lxor m n) k = bxor (test_bit m k) (test_bit n k) :=
by rw [← bitwise_xor, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lnot : ∀ n k, test_bit (lnot n) k = bnot (test_bit n k)
| (n : ℕ) k := by simp [lnot, test_bit]
| -[1+ n] k := by simp [lnot, test_bit]
lemma shiftl_add : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ), shiftl m (n + k) = shiftl (shiftl m n) k
| (m : ℕ) n (k:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.shiftl_add _ _ _)
| -[1+ m] n (k:ℕ) := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat (nat.shiftl'_add _ _ _ _)
| (m : ℕ) n -[1+k] := sub_nat_nat_elim n k.succ
(λ n k i, shiftl ↑m i = nat.shiftr (nat.shiftl m n) k)
(λ i n, congr_arg coe $
by rw [← nat.shiftl_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]; apply nat.le_add_right)
(λ i n, congr_arg coe $
by rw [add_assoc, nat.shiftr_add, ← nat.shiftl_sub, nat.sub_self]; refl)
| -[1+ m] n -[1+k] := sub_nat_nat_elim n k.succ
(λ n k i, shiftl -[1+ m] i = -[1+ nat.shiftr (nat.shiftl' tt m n) k])
(λ i n, congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
by rw [← nat.shiftl'_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]; apply nat.le_add_right)
(λ i n, congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
by rw [add_assoc, nat.shiftr_add, ← nat.shiftl'_sub, nat.sub_self]; refl)
lemma shiftl_sub (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ) : shiftl m (n - k) = shiftr (shiftl m n) k :=
shiftl_add _ _ _
@[simp] lemma shiftl_neg (m n : ℤ) : shiftl m (-n) = shiftr m n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftr_neg (m n : ℤ) : shiftr m (-n) = shiftl m n := by rw [← shiftl_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma shiftl_coe_nat (m n : ℕ) : shiftl m n = nat.shiftl m n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftr_coe_nat (m n : ℕ) : shiftr m n = nat.shiftr m n := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma shiftl_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : shiftl -[1+ m] n = -[1+ nat.shiftl' tt m n] := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftr_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : shiftr -[1+ m] n = -[1+ nat.shiftr m n] := by cases n; refl
lemma shiftr_add : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n k : ℕ), shiftr m (n + k) = shiftr (shiftr m n) k
| (m : ℕ) n k := by rw [shiftr_coe_nat, shiftr_coe_nat,
← int.coe_nat_add, shiftr_coe_nat, nat.shiftr_add]
| -[1+ m] n k := by rw [shiftr_neg_succ, shiftr_neg_succ,
← int.coe_nat_add, shiftr_neg_succ, nat.shiftr_add]
lemma shiftl_eq_mul_pow : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ), shiftl m n = m * ↑(2 ^ n)
| (m : ℕ) n := congr_arg coe (nat.shiftl_eq_mul_pow _ _)
| -[1+ m] n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λi, -i) (nat.shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow _ _)
lemma shiftr_eq_div_pow : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ), shiftr m n = m / ↑(2 ^ n)
| (m : ℕ) n := by rw shiftr_coe_nat; exact congr_arg coe (nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow _ _)
| -[1+ m] n := begin
rw [shiftr_neg_succ, neg_succ_of_nat_div, nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow], refl,
exact coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt (pow_pos dec_trivial _)
end
lemma one_shiftl (n : ℕ) : shiftl 1 n = (2 ^ n : ℕ) :=
congr_arg coe (nat.one_shiftl _)
@[simp] lemma zero_shiftl : ∀ n : ℤ, shiftl 0 n = 0
| (n : ℕ) := congr_arg coe (nat.zero_shiftl _)
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg coe (nat.zero_shiftr _)
@[simp] lemma zero_shiftr (n) : shiftr 0 n = 0 := zero_shiftl _
/-! ### Least upper bound property for integers -/
section classical
open_locale classical
theorem exists_least_of_bdd {P : ℤ → Prop}
(Hbdd : ∃ b : ℤ, ∀ z : ℤ, P z → b ≤ z)
(Hinh : ∃ z : ℤ, P z) : ∃ lb : ℤ, P lb ∧ (∀ z : ℤ, P z → lb ≤ z) :=
let ⟨b, Hb⟩ := Hbdd in
have EX : ∃ n : ℕ, P (b + n), from
let ⟨elt, Helt⟩ := Hinh in
match elt, le.dest (Hb _ Helt), Helt with
| ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, Hn := ⟨n, Hn⟩
end,
⟨b + (nat.find EX : ℤ), nat.find_spec EX, λ z h,
match z, le.dest (Hb _ h), h with
| ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h := add_le_add_left
(int.coe_nat_le.2 $ nat.find_min' _ h) _
end⟩
theorem exists_greatest_of_bdd {P : ℤ → Prop}
(Hbdd : ∃ b : ℤ, ∀ z : ℤ, P z → z ≤ b)
(Hinh : ∃ z : ℤ, P z) : ∃ ub : ℤ, P ub ∧ (∀ z : ℤ, P z → z ≤ ub) :=
have Hbdd' : ∃ (b : ℤ), ∀ (z : ℤ), P (-z) → b ≤ z, from
let ⟨b, Hb⟩ := Hbdd in ⟨-b, λ z h, neg_le.1 (Hb _ h)⟩,
have Hinh' : ∃ z : ℤ, P (-z), from
let ⟨elt, Helt⟩ := Hinh in ⟨-elt, by rw [neg_neg]; exact Helt⟩,
let ⟨lb, Plb, al⟩ := exists_least_of_bdd Hbdd' Hinh' in
⟨-lb, Plb, λ z h, le_neg.1 $ al _ $ by rwa neg_neg⟩
end classical
end int
attribute [irreducible] int.nonneg
|
96e4b91decf5b787169b70df4b4f89fb55077a5a | e09201d437062e1f95e6e5360aab0c9f947901aa | /src/automata/dfa.lean | ad6353567a0765dedc5353e8948d07f88d5f1ffd | [] | no_license | VArtem/lean-regular-languages | 34f4b093f28ef2f09ba7e684e642a0f97c901560 | e877243188253d0ac17ccf0ae2da7bf608686ff0 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,590,111,306 | 1,622,307,234,000 | 1,622,307,234,000 | 284,232,653 | 7 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,810 | lean | import data.set.basic
import data.fintype.basic
import data.finset.basic
import tactic
open set list
variables {S Q : Type} [fintype S] [fintype Q] [decidable_eq Q]
structure DFA (S : Type) (Q : Type) [fintype S] [fintype Q] [decidable_eq Q] :=
(start : Q) -- starting state
(term : set Q) -- terminal states
(next : Q → S → Q) -- transitions
namespace DFA
def go (dfa : DFA S Q) : Q → list S → Q
| q [] := q
| q (head :: tail) := go (dfa.next q head) tail
@[simp] lemma go_finish (dfa : DFA S Q) (q : Q) : go dfa q [] = q := rfl
@[simp] lemma go_step (dfa : DFA S Q) (head : S) (tail : list S) (q : Q) :
go dfa q (head :: tail) = go dfa (dfa.next q head) tail := rfl
@[simp] def dfa_accepts_word (dfa : DFA S Q) (w : list S) : Prop :=
go dfa dfa.start w ∈ dfa.term
@[simp] def lang_of_dfa (dfa : DFA S Q) := {w | dfa_accepts_word dfa w}
def dfa_lang (lang : set (list S)) :=
∃ (Q : Type) [fintype Q] [decidable_eq Q], by exactI ∃ {dfa : DFA S Q}, lang = lang_of_dfa dfa
lemma dfa_go_append {dfa : DFA S Q} {a b c : Q} {left right : list S}:
go dfa a left = b → go dfa b right = c → go dfa a (left ++ right) = c :=
begin
induction left with head tail ih generalizing a, {
rintro ⟨_⟩ hbc,
exact hbc,
}, {
rintro ⟨_⟩ hbc,
specialize @ih (dfa.next a head) rfl hbc,
rwa [cons_append, go_step],
}
end
lemma dfa_go_append' {dfa : DFA S Q} {a : Q} {left right : list S}:
go dfa a (left ++ right) = go dfa (go dfa a left) right :=
begin
induction left with head tail ih generalizing a, {
rw [go_finish, nil_append],
}, {
rw [cons_append, go_step, go_step],
exact @ih (dfa.next a head),
}
end
lemma dfa_go_append_iff {dfa : DFA S Q} {a c : Q} {left right : list S}:
(∃ b, go dfa a left = b ∧ go dfa b right = c) ↔ go dfa a (left ++ right) = c :=
begin
induction left with head tail ih generalizing a, {
split; simp,
}, {
specialize @ih (dfa.next a head),
refine ih,
}
end
lemma eq_next_goes_to_iff {q : Q}
(d1 d2 : DFA S Q) (h : d1.next = d2.next) (w : list S)
: go d1 q w = go d2 q w :=
begin
induction w with head tail ih generalizing q, {
simp only [go_finish],
}, {
specialize @ih (d1.next q head),
rwa [go_step, go_step, ih, h],
},
end
@[simp] lemma mem_lang_iff_dfa_accepts
{L : set (list S)} {dfa : DFA S Q} {w : list S} (autl : L = lang_of_dfa dfa)
: w ∈ L ↔ dfa_accepts_word dfa w :=
begin
subst autl,
refl,
end
def compl_dfa (dfa : DFA S Q) : DFA S Q := {
start := dfa.start,
term := dfa.termᶜ,
next := dfa.next,
}
lemma lang_of_compl_dfa_is_compl_of_lang (dfa : DFA S Q) :
(lang_of_dfa dfa)ᶜ = lang_of_dfa (compl_dfa dfa) :=
begin
ext,
dsimp,
rw eq_next_goes_to_iff (compl_dfa dfa) dfa rfl,
simp [compl_dfa],
end
theorem compl_is_dfa {L : set (list S)} : dfa_lang L → dfa_lang Lᶜ :=
begin
rintro ⟨Q, fQ, dQ, dfa, rfl⟩,
resetI,
use [Q, fQ, dQ, compl_dfa dfa],
exact lang_of_compl_dfa_is_compl_of_lang _,
end
section inter_dfa
variables {Ql Qm : Type} [fintype Ql] [fintype Qm] [decidable_eq Ql] [decidable_eq Qm]
def inter_dfa (l : DFA S Ql) (m : DFA S Qm) : DFA S (Ql × Qm) := {
start := (l.start, m.start),
term := l.term.prod m.term,
next := λ (st : Ql × Qm) (c : S), (l.next st.1 c, m.next st.2 c)
}
@[simp] lemma inter_dfa_start (l : DFA S Ql) (m : DFA S Qm) :
(inter_dfa l m).start = (l.start, m.start) := rfl
lemma inter_dfa_go (l : DFA S Ql) (m : DFA S Qm) {ql qm}
: ∀ {w : list S}, go (inter_dfa l m) (ql, qm) w = (go l ql w, go m qm w) :=
begin
intro w,
induction w with head tail ih generalizing ql qm, {
simp only [go_finish],
}, {
specialize @ih (l.next ql head) (m.next qm head),
simpa only,
},
end
theorem inter_is_dfa {L M : set (list S)}
(hl : dfa_lang L) (hm : dfa_lang M) : dfa_lang (L ∩ M) :=
begin
rcases hl with ⟨Ql, fQl, dQl, dl, rfl⟩,
rcases hm with ⟨Qm, fQm, dQm, dm, rfl⟩,
letI := fQl,
letI := fQm,
existsi [Ql × Qm, _, _, inter_dfa dl dm],
ext word,
split, {
rintro ⟨xl, xm⟩,
dsimp [lang_of_dfa, dfa_accepts_word] at *,
rw [inter_dfa_go, inter_dfa],
use [xl, xm],
}, {
rintro x_inter,
dsimp at x_inter,
rwa [inter_dfa_go, inter_dfa] at x_inter,
},
end
theorem union_is_dfa {L M : set (list S)}
(hl : dfa_lang L) (hm : dfa_lang M) : dfa_lang (L ∪ M) :=
begin
rw union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl,
apply compl_is_dfa,
apply inter_is_dfa,
exact compl_is_dfa hl,
exact compl_is_dfa hm,
end
end inter_dfa
end DFA |
af0e73505a78ff0f3cc6958ab65b9e9da4eef39c | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/data/multiset/powerset_auto.lean | 058bc988214e66e6b463e2f88087318142386815 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,111 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.multiset.basic
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# The powerset of a multiset
-/
namespace multiset
/-! ### powerset -/
/-- A helper function for the powerset of a multiset. Given a list `l`, returns a list
of sublists of `l` (using `sublists_aux`), as multisets. -/
def powerset_aux {α : Type u_1} (l : List α) : List (multiset α) :=
0 :: list.sublists_aux l fun (x : List α) (y : List (multiset α)) => ↑x :: y
theorem powerset_aux_eq_map_coe {α : Type u_1} {l : List α} :
powerset_aux l = list.map coe (list.sublists l) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset_aux {α : Type u_1} {l : List α} {s : multiset α} :
s ∈ powerset_aux l ↔ s ≤ ↑l :=
sorry
/-- Helper function for the powerset of a multiset. Given a list `l`, returns a list
of sublists of `l` (using `sublists'`), as multisets. -/
def powerset_aux' {α : Type u_1} (l : List α) : List (multiset α) := list.map coe (list.sublists' l)
theorem powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux' {α : Type u_1} {l : List α} :
powerset_aux l ~ powerset_aux' l :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (powerset_aux l ~ powerset_aux' l)) powerset_aux_eq_map_coe))
(list.perm.map coe (list.sublists_perm_sublists' l))
@[simp] theorem powerset_aux'_nil {α : Type u_1} : powerset_aux' [] = [0] := rfl
@[simp] theorem powerset_aux'_cons {α : Type u_1} (a : α) (l : List α) :
powerset_aux' (a :: l) = powerset_aux' l ++ list.map (cons a) (powerset_aux' l) :=
sorry
theorem powerset_aux'_perm {α : Type u_1} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
powerset_aux' l₁ ~ powerset_aux' l₂ :=
sorry
theorem powerset_aux_perm {α : Type u_1} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
powerset_aux l₁ ~ powerset_aux l₂ :=
list.perm.trans powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux'
(list.perm.trans (powerset_aux'_perm p) (list.perm.symm powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux'))
/-- The power set of a multiset. -/
def powerset {α : Type u_1} (s : multiset α) : multiset (multiset α) :=
quot.lift_on s (fun (l : List α) => ↑(powerset_aux l)) sorry
theorem powerset_coe {α : Type u_1} (l : List α) :
powerset ↑l = ↑(list.map coe (list.sublists l)) :=
congr_arg coe powerset_aux_eq_map_coe
@[simp] theorem powerset_coe' {α : Type u_1} (l : List α) :
powerset ↑l = ↑(list.map coe (list.sublists' l)) :=
quot.sound powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux'
@[simp] theorem powerset_zero {α : Type u_1} : powerset 0 = 0 ::ₘ 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem powerset_cons {α : Type u_1} (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
powerset (a ::ₘ s) = powerset s + map (cons a) (powerset s) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset {α : Type u_1} {s : multiset α} {t : multiset α} :
s ∈ powerset t ↔ s ≤ t :=
sorry
theorem map_single_le_powerset {α : Type u_1} (s : multiset α) :
map (fun (a : α) => a ::ₘ 0) s ≤ powerset s :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem card_powerset {α : Type u_1} (s : multiset α) :
coe_fn card (powerset s) = bit0 1 ^ coe_fn card s :=
sorry
theorem revzip_powerset_aux {α : Type u_1} {l : List α} {x : multiset α × multiset α}
(h : x ∈ list.revzip (powerset_aux l)) : prod.fst x + prod.snd x = ↑l :=
sorry
theorem revzip_powerset_aux' {α : Type u_1} {l : List α} {x : multiset α × multiset α}
(h : x ∈ list.revzip (powerset_aux' l)) : prod.fst x + prod.snd x = ↑l :=
sorry
theorem revzip_powerset_aux_lemma {α : Type u_1} [DecidableEq α] (l : List α)
{l' : List (multiset α)}
(H : ∀ {x : multiset α × multiset α}, x ∈ list.revzip l' → prod.fst x + prod.snd x = ↑l) :
list.revzip l' = list.map (fun (x : multiset α) => (x, ↑l - x)) l' :=
sorry
theorem revzip_powerset_aux_perm_aux' {α : Type u_1} {l : List α} :
list.revzip (powerset_aux l) ~ list.revzip (powerset_aux' l) :=
sorry
theorem revzip_powerset_aux_perm {α : Type u_1} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
list.revzip (powerset_aux l₁) ~ list.revzip (powerset_aux l₂) :=
sorry
/-! ### powerset_len -/
/-- Helper function for `powerset_len`. Given a list `l`, `powerset_len_aux n l` is the list
of sublists of length `n`, as multisets. -/
def powerset_len_aux {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : List (multiset α) :=
list.sublists_len_aux n l coe []
theorem powerset_len_aux_eq_map_coe {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} {l : List α} :
powerset_len_aux n l = list.map coe (list.sublists_len n l) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset_len_aux {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} {l : List α} {s : multiset α} :
s ∈ powerset_len_aux n l ↔ s ≤ ↑l ∧ coe_fn card s = n :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem powerset_len_aux_zero {α : Type u_1} (l : List α) : powerset_len_aux 0 l = [0] :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem powerset_len_aux_nil {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) : powerset_len_aux (n + 1) [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem powerset_len_aux_cons {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) (a : α) (l : List α) :
powerset_len_aux (n + 1) (a :: l) =
powerset_len_aux (n + 1) l ++ list.map (cons a) (powerset_len_aux n l) :=
sorry
theorem powerset_len_aux_perm {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
powerset_len_aux n l₁ ~ powerset_len_aux n l₂ :=
sorry
/-- `powerset_len n s` is the multiset of all submultisets of `s` of length `n`. -/
def powerset_len {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) (s : multiset α) : multiset (multiset α) :=
quot.lift_on s (fun (l : List α) => ↑(powerset_len_aux n l)) sorry
theorem powerset_len_coe' {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) (l : List α) :
powerset_len n ↑l = ↑(powerset_len_aux n l) :=
rfl
theorem powerset_len_coe {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) (l : List α) :
powerset_len n ↑l = ↑(list.map coe (list.sublists_len n l)) :=
congr_arg coe powerset_len_aux_eq_map_coe
@[simp] theorem powerset_len_zero_left {α : Type u_1} (s : multiset α) :
powerset_len 0 s = 0 ::ₘ 0 :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem powerset_len_zero_right {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) : powerset_len (n + 1) 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem powerset_len_cons {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
powerset_len (n + 1) (a ::ₘ s) = powerset_len (n + 1) s + map (cons a) (powerset_len n s) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset_len {α : Type u_1} {n : ℕ} {s : multiset α} {t : multiset α} :
s ∈ powerset_len n t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ coe_fn card s = n :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem card_powerset_len {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) (s : multiset α) :
coe_fn card (powerset_len n s) = nat.choose (coe_fn card s) n :=
sorry
theorem powerset_len_le_powerset {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) (s : multiset α) :
powerset_len n s ≤ powerset s :=
sorry
theorem powerset_len_mono {α : Type u_1} (n : ℕ) {s : multiset α} {t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) :
powerset_len n s ≤ powerset_len n t :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
5ab1ce63d045191789f0eb713187e9aade901302 | 22e97a5d648fc451e25a06c668dc03ac7ed7bc25 | /src/computability/turing_machine.lean | eee14d30217f01112e732a8d61f0a80fe48b8fb9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | keeferrowan/mathlib | f2818da875dbc7780830d09bd4c526b0764a4e50 | aad2dfc40e8e6a7e258287a7c1580318e865817e | refs/heads/master | 1,661,736,426,952 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 266,892,663 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,445,835,000 | 1,590,445,835,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 109,083 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.order
import data.fintype.basic
import data.pfun
import tactic.apply_fun
/-!
# Turing machines
This file defines a sequence of simple machine languages, starting with Turing machines and working
up to more complex languages based on Wang B-machines.
## Naming conventions
Each model of computation in this file shares a naming convention for the elements of a model of
computation. These are the parameters for the language:
* `Γ` is the alphabet on the tape.
* `Λ` is the set of labels, or internal machine states.
* `σ` is the type of internal memory, not on the tape. This does not exist in the TM0 model, and
later models achieve this by mixing it into `Λ`.
* `K` is used in the TM2 model, which has multiple stacks, and denotes the number of such stacks.
All of these variables denote "essentially finite" types, but for technical reasons it is
convenient to allow them to be infinite anyway. When using an infinite type, we will be interested
to prove that only finitely many values of the type are ever interacted with.
Given these parameters, there are a few common structures for the model that arise:
* `stmt` is the set of all actions that can be performed in one step. For the TM0 model this set is
finite, and for later models it is an infinite inductive type representing "possible program
texts".
* `cfg` is the set of instantaneous configurations, that is, the state of the machine together with
its environment.
* `machine` is the set of all machines in the model. Usually this is approximately a function
`Λ → stmt`, although different models have different ways of halting and other actions.
* `step : cfg → option cfg` is the function that describes how the state evolves over one step.
If `step c = none`, then `c` is a terminal state, and the result of the computation is read off
from `c`. Because of the type of `step`, these models are all deterministic by construction.
* `init : input → cfg` sets up the initial state. The type `input` depends on the model;
in most cases it is `list Γ`.
* `eval : machine → input → roption output`, given a machine `M` and input `i`, starts from
`init i`, runs `step` until it reaches an output, and then applies a function `cfg → output` to
the final state to obtain the result. The type `output` depends on the model.
* `supports : machine → finset Λ → Prop` asserts that a machine `M` starts in `S : finset Λ`, and
can only ever jump to other states inside `S`. This implies that the behavior of `M` on any input
cannot depend on its values outside `S`. We use this to allow `Λ` to be an infinite set when
convenient, and prove that only finitely many of these states are actually accessible. This
formalizes "essentially finite" mentioned above.
-/
open relation
open function (update)
namespace turing
/-- The `blank_extends` partial order holds of `l₁` and `l₂` if `l₂` is obtained by adding
blanks (`default Γ`) to the end of `l₁`. -/
def blank_extends {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : list Γ) : Prop :=
∃ n, l₂ = l₁ ++ list.repeat (default Γ) n
@[refl] theorem blank_extends.refl {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list Γ) : blank_extends l l := ⟨0, by simp⟩
@[trans] theorem blank_extends.trans {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list Γ} :
blank_extends l₁ l₂ → blank_extends l₂ l₃ → blank_extends l₁ l₃ :=
by rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, rfl⟩; exact ⟨i+j, by simp [list.repeat_add]⟩
theorem blank_extends.below_of_le {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : list Γ} :
blank_extends l l₁ → blank_extends l l₂ →
l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → blank_extends l₁ l₂ :=
begin
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, rfl⟩ h, use j - i,
simp only [list.length_append, add_le_add_iff_left, list.length_repeat] at h,
simp only [← list.repeat_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' h, list.append_assoc],
end
/-- Any two extensions by blank `l₁,l₂` of `l` have a common join (which can be taken to be the
longer of `l₁` and `l₂`). -/
def blank_extends.above {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : list Γ}
(h₁ : blank_extends l l₁) (h₂ : blank_extends l l₂) :
{l' // blank_extends l₁ l' ∧ blank_extends l₂ l'} :=
if h : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length then
⟨l₂, h₁.below_of_le h₂ h, blank_extends.refl _⟩
else
⟨l₁, blank_extends.refl _, h₂.below_of_le h₁ (le_of_not_ge h)⟩
theorem blank_extends.above_of_le {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {l l₁ l₂ : list Γ} :
blank_extends l₁ l → blank_extends l₂ l →
l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → blank_extends l₁ l₂ :=
begin
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, e⟩ h, use i - j,
refine list.append_right_cancel (e.symm.trans _),
rw [list.append_assoc, ← list.repeat_add, nat.sub_add_cancel],
apply_fun list.length at e,
simp only [list.length_append, list.length_repeat] at e,
rwa [ge, ← add_le_add_iff_left, e, add_le_add_iff_right]
end
/-- `blank_rel` is the symmetric closure of `blank_extends`, turning it into an equivalence
relation. Two lists are related by `blank_rel` if one extends the other by blanks. -/
def blank_rel {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : list Γ) : Prop :=
blank_extends l₁ l₂ ∨ blank_extends l₂ l₁
@[refl] theorem blank_rel.refl {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list Γ) : blank_rel l l :=
or.inl (blank_extends.refl _)
@[symm] theorem blank_rel.symm {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : list Γ} :
blank_rel l₁ l₂ → blank_rel l₂ l₁ := or.symm
@[trans] theorem blank_rel.trans {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list Γ} :
blank_rel l₁ l₂ → blank_rel l₂ l₃ → blank_rel l₁ l₃ :=
begin
rintro (h₁|h₁) (h₂|h₂),
{ exact or.inl (h₁.trans h₂) },
{ cases le_total l₁.length l₃.length with h h,
{ exact or.inl (h₁.above_of_le h₂ h) },
{ exact or.inr (h₂.above_of_le h₁ h) } },
{ cases le_total l₁.length l₃.length with h h,
{ exact or.inl (h₁.below_of_le h₂ h) },
{ exact or.inr (h₂.below_of_le h₁ h) } },
{ exact or.inr (h₂.trans h₁) },
end
/-- Given two `blank_rel` lists, there exists (constructively) a common join. -/
def blank_rel.above {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : list Γ} (h : blank_rel l₁ l₂) :
{l // blank_extends l₁ l ∧ blank_extends l₂ l} :=
begin
refine if hl : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length
then ⟨l₂, or.elim h id (λ h', _), blank_extends.refl _⟩
else ⟨l₁, blank_extends.refl _, or.elim h (λ h', _) id⟩,
exact (blank_extends.refl _).above_of_le h' hl,
exact (blank_extends.refl _).above_of_le h' (le_of_not_ge hl)
end
/-- Given two `blank_rel` lists, there exists (constructively) a common meet. -/
def blank_rel.below {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {l₁ l₂ : list Γ} (h : blank_rel l₁ l₂) :
{l // blank_extends l l₁ ∧ blank_extends l l₂} :=
begin
refine if hl : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length
then ⟨l₁, blank_extends.refl _, or.elim h id (λ h', _)⟩
else ⟨l₂, or.elim h (λ h', _) id, blank_extends.refl _⟩,
exact (blank_extends.refl _).above_of_le h' hl,
exact (blank_extends.refl _).above_of_le h' (le_of_not_ge hl)
end
theorem blank_rel.equivalence (Γ) [inhabited Γ] : equivalence (@blank_rel Γ _) :=
⟨blank_rel.refl, @blank_rel.symm _ _, @blank_rel.trans _ _⟩
/-- Construct a setoid instance for `blank_rel`. -/
def blank_rel.setoid (Γ) [inhabited Γ] : setoid (list Γ) := ⟨_, blank_rel.equivalence _⟩
/-- A `list_blank Γ` is a quotient of `list Γ` by extension by blanks at the end. This is used to
represent half-tapes of a Turing machine, so that we can pretend that the list continues
infinitely with blanks. -/
def list_blank (Γ) [inhabited Γ] := quotient (blank_rel.setoid Γ)
instance list_blank.inhabited {Γ} [inhabited Γ] : inhabited (list_blank Γ) := ⟨quotient.mk' []⟩
instance list_blank.has_emptyc {Γ} [inhabited Γ] : has_emptyc (list_blank Γ) := ⟨quotient.mk' []⟩
/-- A modified version of `quotient.lift_on'` specialized for `list_blank`, with the stronger
precondition `blank_extends` instead of `blank_rel`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator, reducible]
protected def list_blank.lift_on {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {α} (l : list_blank Γ) (f : list Γ → α)
(H : ∀ a b, blank_extends a b → f a = f b) : α :=
l.lift_on' f $ by rintro a b (h|h); [exact H _ _ h, exact (H _ _ h).symm]
/-- The quotient map turning a `list` into a `list_blank`. -/
def list_blank.mk {Γ} [inhabited Γ] : list Γ → list_blank Γ := quotient.mk'
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected lemma list_blank.induction_on {Γ} [inhabited Γ]
{p : list_blank Γ → Prop} (q : list_blank Γ)
(h : ∀ a, p (list_blank.mk a)) : p q := quotient.induction_on' q h
/-- The head of a `list_blank` is well defined. -/
def list_blank.head {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list_blank Γ) : Γ :=
l.lift_on list.head begin
rintro _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩,
cases a, {cases i; refl}, refl
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.head_mk {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list Γ) :
list_blank.head (list_blank.mk l) = l.head := rfl
/-- The tail of a `list_blank` is well defined (up to the tail of blanks). -/
def list_blank.tail {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list_blank Γ) : list_blank Γ :=
l.lift_on (λ l, list_blank.mk l.tail) begin
rintro _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩,
refine quotient.sound' (or.inl _),
cases a; [{cases i; [exact ⟨0, rfl⟩, exact ⟨i, rfl⟩]}, exact ⟨i, rfl⟩]
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.tail_mk {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list Γ) :
list_blank.tail (list_blank.mk l) = list_blank.mk l.tail := rfl
/-- We can cons an element onto a `list_blank`. -/
def list_blank.cons {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) (l : list_blank Γ) : list_blank Γ :=
l.lift_on (λ l, list_blank.mk (list.cons a l)) begin
rintro _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩,
exact quotient.sound' (or.inl ⟨i, rfl⟩),
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.cons_mk {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) (l : list Γ) :
list_blank.cons a (list_blank.mk l) = list_blank.mk (a :: l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem list_blank.head_cons {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) :
∀ (l : list_blank Γ), (l.cons a).head = a :=
quotient.ind' $ by exact λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem list_blank.tail_cons {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (a : Γ) :
∀ (l : list_blank Γ), (l.cons a).tail = l :=
quotient.ind' $ by exact λ l, rfl
/-- The `cons` and `head`/`tail` functions are mutually inverse, unlike in the case of `list` where
this only holds for nonempty lists. -/
@[simp] theorem list_blank.cons_head_tail {Γ} [inhabited Γ] :
∀ (l : list_blank Γ), l.tail.cons l.head = l :=
quotient.ind' begin
refine (λ l, quotient.sound' (or.inr _)),
cases l, {exact ⟨1, rfl⟩}, {refl},
end
/-- The `cons` and `head`/`tail` functions are mutually inverse, unlike in the case of `list` where
this only holds for nonempty lists. -/
theorem list_blank.exists_cons {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list_blank Γ) :
∃ a l', l = list_blank.cons a l' :=
⟨_, _, (list_blank.cons_head_tail _).symm⟩
/-- The n-th element of a `list_blank` is well defined for all `n : ℕ`, unlike in a `list`. -/
def list_blank.nth {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list_blank Γ) (n : ℕ) : Γ :=
l.lift_on (λ l, list.inth l n) begin
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩,
simp only [list.inth],
cases lt_or_le _ _ with h h, {rw list.nth_append h},
rw list.nth_len_le h,
cases le_or_lt _ _ with h₂ h₂, {rw list.nth_len_le h₂},
rw [list.nth_le_nth h₂, list.nth_le_append_right h, list.nth_le_repeat]
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.nth_mk {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list Γ) (n : ℕ) :
(list_blank.mk l).nth n = l.inth n := rfl
@[simp] theorem list_blank.nth_zero {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list_blank Γ) : l.nth 0 = l.head :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← list_blank.cons_head_tail l]},
exact quotient.induction_on' l.tail (λ l, rfl)
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.nth_succ {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list_blank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
l.nth (n + 1) = l.tail.nth n :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← list_blank.cons_head_tail l]},
exact quotient.induction_on' l.tail (λ l, rfl)
end
@[ext] theorem list_blank.ext {Γ} [inhabited Γ] {L₁ L₂ : list_blank Γ} :
(∀ i, L₁.nth i = L₂.nth i) → L₁ = L₂ :=
list_blank.induction_on L₁ $ λ l₁, list_blank.induction_on L₂ $ λ l₂ H,
begin
wlog h : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length using l₁ l₂,
swap, { exact (this $ λ i, (H i).symm).symm },
refine quotient.sound' (or.inl ⟨l₂.length - l₁.length, _⟩),
refine list.ext_le _ (λ i h h₂, eq.symm _),
{ simp only [nat.add_sub_of_le h, list.length_append, list.length_repeat] },
simp at H,
cases lt_or_le i l₁.length with h' h',
{ simpa only [list.nth_le_append _ h',
list.nth_le_nth h, list.nth_le_nth h', option.iget] using H i },
{ simpa only [list.nth_le_append_right h', list.nth_le_repeat,
list.nth_le_nth h, list.nth_len_le h', option.iget] using H i },
end
/-- Apply a function to a value stored at the nth position of the list. -/
@[simp] def list_blank.modify_nth {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) : ℕ → list_blank Γ → list_blank Γ
| 0 L := L.tail.cons (f L.head)
| (n+1) L := (L.tail.modify_nth n).cons L.head
theorem list_blank.nth_modify_nth {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) (n i) (L : list_blank Γ) :
(L.modify_nth f n).nth i = if i = n then f (L.nth i) else L.nth i :=
begin
induction n with n IH generalizing i L,
{ cases i; simp only [list_blank.nth_zero, if_true,
list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.modify_nth, eq_self_iff_true,
list_blank.nth_succ, if_false, list_blank.tail_cons] },
{ cases i,
{ rw if_neg (nat.succ_ne_zero _).symm,
simp only [list_blank.nth_zero, list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.modify_nth] },
{ simp only [IH, list_blank.modify_nth, list_blank.nth_succ, list_blank.tail_cons],
congr } }
end
/-- A pointed map of `inhabited` types is a map that sends one default value to the other. -/
structure {u v} pointed_map (Γ : Type u) (Γ' : Type v)
[inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ'] : Type (max u v) :=
(f : Γ → Γ') (map_pt' : f (default _) = default _)
instance {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ'] : inhabited (pointed_map Γ Γ') :=
⟨⟨λ _, default _, rfl⟩⟩
instance {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ'] : has_coe_to_fun (pointed_map Γ Γ') :=
⟨_, pointed_map.f⟩
@[simp] theorem pointed_map.mk_val {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : Γ → Γ') (pt) : (pointed_map.mk f pt : Γ → Γ') = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem pointed_map.map_pt {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') : f (default _) = default _ := pointed_map.map_pt' _
@[simp] theorem pointed_map.head_map {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (l : list Γ) : (l.map f).head = f l.head :=
by cases l; [exact (pointed_map.map_pt f).symm, refl]
/-- The `map` function on lists is well defined on `list_blank`s provided that the map is
pointed. -/
def list_blank.map {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (l : list_blank Γ) : list_blank Γ' :=
l.lift_on (λ l, list_blank.mk (list.map f l)) begin
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩, refine quotient.sound' (or.inl ⟨i, _⟩),
simp only [pointed_map.map_pt, list.map_append, list.map_repeat],
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.map_mk {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (l : list Γ) : (list_blank.mk l).map f = list_blank.mk (l.map f) := rfl
@[simp] theorem list_blank.head_map {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (l : list_blank Γ) : (l.map f).head = f l.head :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← list_blank.cons_head_tail l]},
exact quotient.induction_on' l (λ a, rfl)
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.tail_map {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (l : list_blank Γ) : (l.map f).tail = l.tail.map f :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← list_blank.cons_head_tail l]},
exact quotient.induction_on' l (λ a, rfl)
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.map_cons {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (l : list_blank Γ) (a : Γ) : (l.cons a).map f = (l.map f).cons (f a) :=
begin
refine (list_blank.cons_head_tail _).symm.trans _,
simp only [list_blank.head_map, list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.tail_map, list_blank.tail_cons]
end
@[simp] theorem list_blank.nth_map {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (l : list_blank Γ) (n : ℕ) : (l.map f).nth n = f (l.nth n) :=
l.induction_on begin
intro l, simp only [list.nth_map, list_blank.map_mk, list_blank.nth_mk, list.inth],
cases l.nth n, {exact f.2.symm}, {refl}
end
/-- The `i`-th projection as a pointed map. -/
def proj {ι : Type*} {Γ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, inhabited (Γ i)] (i : ι) :
pointed_map (∀ i, Γ i) (Γ i) := ⟨λ a, a i, rfl⟩
theorem proj_map_nth {ι : Type*} {Γ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, inhabited (Γ i)] (i : ι)
(L n) : (list_blank.map (@proj ι Γ _ i) L).nth n = L.nth n i :=
by rw list_blank.nth_map; refl
theorem list_blank.map_modify_nth {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(F : pointed_map Γ Γ') (f : Γ → Γ) (f' : Γ' → Γ')
(H : ∀ x, F (f x) = f' (F x)) (n) (L : list_blank Γ) :
(L.modify_nth f n).map F = (L.map F).modify_nth f' n :=
by induction n with n IH generalizing L; simp only [*,
list_blank.head_map, list_blank.modify_nth, list_blank.map_cons, list_blank.tail_map]
/-- Append a list on the left side of a list_blank. -/
@[simp] def list_blank.append {Γ} [inhabited Γ] : list Γ → list_blank Γ → list_blank Γ
| [] L := L
| (a :: l) L := list_blank.cons a (list_blank.append l L)
@[simp] theorem list_blank.append_mk {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : list Γ) :
list_blank.append l₁ (list_blank.mk l₂) = list_blank.mk (l₁ ++ l₂) :=
by induction l₁; simp only [*,
list_blank.append, list.nil_append, list.cons_append, list_blank.cons_mk]
theorem list_blank.append_assoc {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l₁ l₂ : list Γ) (l₃ : list_blank Γ) :
list_blank.append (l₁ ++ l₂) l₃ = list_blank.append l₁ (list_blank.append l₂ l₃) :=
l₃.induction_on $ by intro; simp only [list_blank.append_mk, list.append_assoc]
/-- The `bind` function on lists is well defined on `list_blank`s provided that the default element
is sent to a sequence of default elements. -/
def list_blank.bind {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(l : list_blank Γ) (f : Γ → list Γ')
(hf : ∃ n, f (default _) = list.repeat (default _) n) : list_blank Γ' :=
l.lift_on (λ l, list_blank.mk (list.bind l f)) begin
rintro l _ ⟨i, rfl⟩, cases hf with n e, refine quotient.sound' (or.inl ⟨i * n, _⟩),
rw [list.bind_append, mul_comm], congr,
induction i with i IH, refl,
simp only [IH, e, list.repeat_add, nat.mul_succ, add_comm, list.repeat_succ, list.cons_bind],
end
@[simp] lemma list_blank.bind_mk {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(l : list Γ) (f : Γ → list Γ') (hf) :
(list_blank.mk l).bind f hf = list_blank.mk (l.bind f) := rfl
@[simp] lemma list_blank.cons_bind {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(a : Γ) (l : list_blank Γ) (f : Γ → list Γ') (hf) :
(l.cons a).bind f hf = (l.bind f hf).append (f a) :=
l.induction_on $ by intro; simp only [list_blank.append_mk,
list_blank.bind_mk, list_blank.cons_mk, list.cons_bind]
/-- The tape of a Turing machine is composed of a head element (which we imagine to be the
current position of the head), together with two `list_blank`s denoting the portions of the tape
going off to the left and right. When the Turing machine moves right, an element is pulled from the
right side and becomes the new head, while the head element is consed onto the left side. -/
structure tape (Γ : Type*) [inhabited Γ] :=
(head : Γ)
(left : list_blank Γ)
(right : list_blank Γ)
instance tape.inhabited {Γ} [inhabited Γ] : inhabited (tape Γ) :=
⟨by constructor; apply default⟩
/-- A direction for the turing machine `move` command, either
left or right. -/
@[derive decidable_eq, derive inhabited]
inductive dir | left | right
/-- The "inclusive" left side of the tape, including both `left` and `head`. -/
def tape.left₀ {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) : list_blank Γ := T.left.cons T.head
/-- The "inclusive" right side of the tape, including both `right` and `head`. -/
def tape.right₀ {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) : list_blank Γ := T.right.cons T.head
/-- Move the tape in response to a motion of the Turing machine. Note that `T.move dir.left` makes
`T.left` smaller; the Turing machine is moving left and the tape is moving right. -/
def tape.move {Γ} [inhabited Γ] : dir → tape Γ → tape Γ
| dir.left ⟨a, L, R⟩ := ⟨L.head, L.tail, R.cons a⟩
| dir.right ⟨a, L, R⟩ := ⟨R.head, L.cons a, R.tail⟩
@[simp] theorem tape.move_left_right {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) :
(T.move dir.left).move dir.right = T :=
by cases T; simp [tape.move]
@[simp] theorem tape.move_right_left {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) :
(T.move dir.right).move dir.left = T :=
by cases T; simp [tape.move]
/-- Construct a tape from a left side and an inclusive right side. -/
def tape.mk' {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list_blank Γ) : tape Γ := ⟨R.head, L, R.tail⟩
@[simp] theorem tape.mk'_left {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list_blank Γ) :
(tape.mk' L R).left = L := rfl
@[simp] theorem tape.mk'_head {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list_blank Γ) :
(tape.mk' L R).head = R.head := rfl
@[simp] theorem tape.mk'_right {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list_blank Γ) :
(tape.mk' L R).right = R.tail := rfl
@[simp] theorem tape.mk'_right₀ {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list_blank Γ) :
(tape.mk' L R).right₀ = R := list_blank.cons_head_tail _
@[simp] theorem tape.mk'_left_right₀ {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) :
tape.mk' T.left T.right₀ = T :=
by cases T; simp only [tape.right₀, tape.mk',
list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.tail_cons, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
theorem tape.exists_mk' {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) :
∃ L R, T = tape.mk' L R := ⟨_, _, (tape.mk'_left_right₀ _).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem tape.move_left_mk' {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list_blank Γ) :
(tape.mk' L R).move dir.left = tape.mk' L.tail (R.cons L.head) :=
by simp only [tape.move, tape.mk', list_blank.head_cons, eq_self_iff_true,
list_blank.cons_head_tail, and_self, list_blank.tail_cons]
@[simp] theorem tape.move_right_mk' {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list_blank Γ) :
(tape.mk' L R).move dir.right = tape.mk' (L.cons R.head) R.tail :=
by simp only [tape.move, tape.mk', list_blank.head_cons, eq_self_iff_true,
list_blank.cons_head_tail, and_self, list_blank.tail_cons]
/-- Construct a tape from a left side and an inclusive right side. -/
def tape.mk₂ {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list Γ) : tape Γ :=
tape.mk' (list_blank.mk L) (list_blank.mk R)
/-- Construct a tape from a list, with the head of the list at the TM head and the rest going
to the right. -/
def tape.mk₁ {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (l : list Γ) : tape Γ :=
tape.mk₂ [] l
/-- The `nth` function of a tape is integer-valued, with index `0` being the head, negative indexes
on the left and positive indexes on the right. (Picture a number line.) -/
def tape.nth {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) : ℤ → Γ
| 0 := T.head
| (n+1:ℕ) := T.right.nth n
| -[1+ n] := T.left.nth n
@[simp] theorem tape.nth_zero {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) : T.nth 0 = T.1 := rfl
theorem tape.right₀_nth {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) (n : ℕ) : T.right₀.nth n = T.nth n :=
by cases n; simp only [tape.nth, tape.right₀, int.coe_nat_zero,
list_blank.nth_zero, list_blank.nth_succ, list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.tail_cons]
@[simp] theorem tape.mk'_nth_nat {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (L R : list_blank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
(tape.mk' L R).nth n = R.nth n :=
by rw [← tape.right₀_nth, tape.mk'_right₀]
@[simp] theorem tape.move_left_nth {Γ} [inhabited Γ] :
∀ (T : tape Γ) (i : ℤ), (T.move dir.left).nth i = T.nth (i-1)
| ⟨a, L, R⟩ -[1+ n] := (list_blank.nth_succ _ _).symm
| ⟨a, L, R⟩ 0 := (list_blank.nth_zero _).symm
| ⟨a, L, R⟩ 1 := (list_blank.nth_zero _).trans (list_blank.head_cons _ _)
| ⟨a, L, R⟩ ((n+1:ℕ)+1) := begin
rw add_sub_cancel,
change (R.cons a).nth (n+1) = R.nth n,
rw [list_blank.nth_succ, list_blank.tail_cons]
end
@[simp] theorem tape.move_right_nth {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) (i : ℤ) :
(T.move dir.right).nth i = T.nth (i+1) :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw ← T.move_right_left}; rw [tape.move_left_nth, add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] theorem tape.move_right_n_head {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (T : tape Γ) (i : ℕ) :
((tape.move dir.right)^[i] T).head = T.nth i :=
by induction i generalizing T; [refl, simp only [*,
tape.move_right_nth, int.coe_nat_succ, nat.iterate_succ]]
/-- Replace the current value of the head on the tape. -/
def tape.write {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (b : Γ) (T : tape Γ) : tape Γ := {head := b, ..T}
@[simp] theorem tape.write_self {Γ} [inhabited Γ] : ∀ (T : tape Γ), T.write T.1 = T :=
by rintro ⟨⟩; refl
@[simp] theorem tape.write_nth {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (b : Γ) :
∀ (T : tape Γ) {i : ℤ}, (T.write b).nth i = if i = 0 then b else T.nth i
| ⟨a, L, R⟩ 0 := rfl
| ⟨a, L, R⟩ (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| ⟨a, L, R⟩ -[1+ n] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tape.write_mk' {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (a b : Γ) (L R : list_blank Γ) :
(tape.mk' L (R.cons a)).write b = tape.mk' L (R.cons b) :=
by simp only [tape.write, tape.mk', list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.tail_cons,
eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
/-- Apply a pointed map to a tape to change the alphabet. -/
def tape.map {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ'] (f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (T : tape Γ) : tape Γ' :=
⟨f T.1, T.2.map f, T.3.map f⟩
@[simp] theorem tape.map_fst {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') : ∀ (T : tape Γ), (T.map f).1 = f T.1 :=
by rintro ⟨⟩; refl
@[simp] theorem tape.map_write {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ'] (f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (b : Γ) :
∀ (T : tape Γ), (T.write b).map f = (T.map f).write (f b) :=
by rintro ⟨⟩; refl
@[simp] theorem tape.write_move_right_n {Γ} [inhabited Γ] (f : Γ → Γ) (L R : list_blank Γ) (n : ℕ) :
((tape.move dir.right)^[n] (tape.mk' L R)).write (f (R.nth n)) =
((tape.move dir.right)^[n] (tape.mk' L (R.modify_nth f n))) :=
begin
induction n with n IH generalizing L R,
{ simp only [list_blank.nth_zero, list_blank.modify_nth, nat.iterate_zero_apply],
rw [← tape.write_mk', list_blank.cons_head_tail] },
simp only [list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.nth_succ, list_blank.modify_nth,
tape.move_right_mk', list_blank.tail_cons, nat.iterate_succ_apply, IH]
end
theorem tape.map_move {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ']
(f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (T : tape Γ) (d) : (T.move d).map f = (T.map f).move d :=
by cases T; cases d; simp only [tape.move, tape.map,
list_blank.head_map, eq_self_iff_true, list_blank.map_cons, and_self, list_blank.tail_map]
theorem tape.map_mk' {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ'] (f : pointed_map Γ Γ')
(L R : list_blank Γ) : (tape.mk' L R).map f = tape.mk' (L.map f) (R.map f) :=
by simp only [tape.mk', tape.map, list_blank.head_map,
eq_self_iff_true, and_self, list_blank.tail_map]
theorem tape.map_mk₂ {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ'] (f : pointed_map Γ Γ')
(L R : list Γ) : (tape.mk₂ L R).map f = tape.mk₂ (L.map f) (R.map f) :=
by simp only [tape.mk₂, tape.map_mk', list_blank.map_mk]
theorem tape.map_mk₁ {Γ Γ'} [inhabited Γ] [inhabited Γ'] (f : pointed_map Γ Γ')
(l : list Γ) : (tape.mk₁ l).map f = tape.mk₁ (l.map f) := tape.map_mk₂ _ _ _
/-- Run a state transition function `σ → option σ` "to completion". The return value is the last
state returned before a `none` result. If the state transition function always returns `some`,
then the computation diverges, returning `roption.none`. -/
def eval {σ} (f : σ → option σ) : σ → roption σ :=
pfun.fix (λ s, roption.some $
match f s with none := sum.inl s | some s' := sum.inr s' end)
/-- The reflexive transitive closure of a state transition function. `reaches f a b` means
there is a finite sequence of steps `f a = some a₁`, `f a₁ = some a₂`, ... such that `aₙ = b`.
This relation permits zero steps of the state transition function. -/
def reaches {σ} (f : σ → option σ) : σ → σ → Prop :=
refl_trans_gen (λ a b, b ∈ f a)
/-- The transitive closure of a state transition function. `reaches₁ f a b` means there is a
nonempty finite sequence of steps `f a = some a₁`, `f a₁ = some a₂`, ... such that `aₙ = b`.
This relation does not permit zero steps of the state transition function. -/
def reaches₁ {σ} (f : σ → option σ) : σ → σ → Prop :=
trans_gen (λ a b, b ∈ f a)
theorem reaches₁_eq {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b c}
(h : f a = f b) : reaches₁ f a c ↔ reaches₁ f b c :=
trans_gen.head'_iff.trans (trans_gen.head'_iff.trans $ by rw h).symm
theorem reaches_total {σ} {f : σ → option σ}
{a b c} : reaches f a b → reaches f a c →
reaches f b c ∨ reaches f c b :=
refl_trans_gen.total_of_right_unique $ λ _ _ _, option.mem_unique
theorem reaches₁_fwd {σ} {f : σ → option σ}
{a b c} (h₁ : reaches₁ f a c) (h₂ : b ∈ f a) : reaches f b c :=
begin
rcases trans_gen.head'_iff.1 h₁ with ⟨b', hab, hbc⟩,
cases option.mem_unique hab h₂, exact hbc
end
/-- A variation on `reaches`. `reaches₀ f a b` holds if whenever `reaches₁ f b c` then
`reaches₁ f a c`. This is a weaker property than `reaches` and is useful for replacing states with
equivalent states without taking a step. -/
def reaches₀ {σ} (f : σ → option σ) (a b : σ) : Prop :=
∀ c, reaches₁ f b c → reaches₁ f a c
theorem reaches₀.trans {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b c : σ}
(h₁ : reaches₀ f a b) (h₂ : reaches₀ f b c) : reaches₀ f a c
| d h₃ := h₁ _ (h₂ _ h₃)
@[refl] theorem reaches₀.refl {σ} {f : σ → option σ} (a : σ) : reaches₀ f a a
| b h := h
theorem reaches₀.single {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b : σ}
(h : b ∈ f a) : reaches₀ f a b
| c h₂ := h₂.head h
theorem reaches₀.head {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b c : σ}
(h : b ∈ f a) (h₂ : reaches₀ f b c) : reaches₀ f a c :=
(reaches₀.single h).trans h₂
theorem reaches₀.tail {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b c : σ}
(h₁ : reaches₀ f a b) (h : c ∈ f b) : reaches₀ f a c :=
h₁.trans (reaches₀.single h)
theorem reaches₀_eq {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b}
(e : f a = f b) : reaches₀ f a b
| d h := (reaches₁_eq e).2 h
theorem reaches₁.to₀ {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b : σ}
(h : reaches₁ f a b) : reaches₀ f a b
| c h₂ := h.trans h₂
theorem reaches.to₀ {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b : σ}
(h : reaches f a b) : reaches₀ f a b
| c h₂ := h₂.trans_right h
theorem reaches₀.tail' {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b c : σ}
(h : reaches₀ f a b) (h₂ : c ∈ f b) : reaches₁ f a c :=
h _ (trans_gen.single h₂)
theorem mem_eval {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b} :
b ∈ eval f a ↔ reaches f a b ∧ f b = none :=
⟨λ h, begin
refine pfun.fix_induction h (λ a h IH, _),
cases e : f a with a',
{ rw roption.mem_unique h (pfun.mem_fix_iff.2 $ or.inl $
roption.mem_some_iff.2 $ by rw e; refl),
exact ⟨refl_trans_gen.refl, e⟩ },
{ rcases pfun.mem_fix_iff.1 h with h | ⟨_, h, h'⟩;
rw e at h; cases roption.mem_some_iff.1 h,
cases IH a' h' (by rwa e) with h₁ h₂,
exact ⟨refl_trans_gen.head e h₁, h₂⟩ }
end, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, begin
refine refl_trans_gen.head_induction_on h₁ _ (λ a a' h _ IH, _),
{ refine pfun.mem_fix_iff.2 (or.inl _),
rw h₂, apply roption.mem_some },
{ refine pfun.mem_fix_iff.2 (or.inr ⟨_, _, IH⟩),
rw show f a = _, from h,
apply roption.mem_some }
end⟩
theorem eval_maximal₁ {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b}
(h : b ∈ eval f a) (c) : ¬ reaches₁ f b c | bc :=
let ⟨ab, b0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h, ⟨b', h', _⟩ := trans_gen.head'_iff.1 bc in
by cases b0.symm.trans h'
theorem eval_maximal {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b}
(h : b ∈ eval f a) {c} : reaches f b c ↔ c = b :=
let ⟨ab, b0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h in
refl_trans_gen_iff_eq $ λ b' h', by cases b0.symm.trans h'
theorem reaches_eval {σ} {f : σ → option σ} {a b}
(ab : reaches f a b) : eval f a = eval f b :=
roption.ext $ λ c,
⟨λ h, let ⟨ac, c0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h in
mem_eval.2 ⟨(or_iff_left_of_imp $ by exact
λ cb, (eval_maximal h).1 cb ▸ refl_trans_gen.refl).1
(reaches_total ab ac), c0⟩,
λ h, let ⟨bc, c0⟩ := mem_eval.1 h in mem_eval.2 ⟨ab.trans bc, c0⟩,⟩
/-- Given a relation `tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop` between state spaces, and state transition functions
`f₁ : σ₁ → option σ₁` and `f₂ : σ₂ → option σ₂`, `respects f₁ f₂ tr` means that if `tr a₁ a₂` holds
initially and `f₁` takes a step to `a₂` then `f₂` will take one or more steps before reaching a
state `b₂` satisfying `tr a₂ b₂`, and if `f₁ a₁` terminates then `f₂ a₂` also terminates.
Such a relation `tr` is also known as a refinement. -/
def respects {σ₁ σ₂}
(f₁ : σ₁ → option σ₁) (f₂ : σ₂ → option σ₂) (tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop) :=
∀ ⦃a₁ a₂⦄, tr a₁ a₂ → (match f₁ a₁ with
| some b₁ := ∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ reaches₁ f₂ a₂ b₂
| none := f₂ a₂ = none
end : Prop)
theorem tr_reaches₁ {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop}
(H : respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂} (aa : tr a₁ a₂) {b₁} (ab : reaches₁ f₁ a₁ b₁) :
∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ reaches₁ f₂ a₂ b₂ :=
begin
induction ab with c₁ ac c₁ d₁ ac cd IH,
{ have := H aa,
rwa (show f₁ a₁ = _, from ac) at this },
{ rcases IH with ⟨c₂, cc, ac₂⟩,
have := H cc,
rw (show f₁ c₁ = _, from cd) at this,
rcases this with ⟨d₂, dd, cd₂⟩,
exact ⟨_, dd, ac₂.trans cd₂⟩ }
end
theorem tr_reaches {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop}
(H : respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂} (aa : tr a₁ a₂) {b₁} (ab : reaches f₁ a₁ b₁) :
∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ reaches f₂ a₂ b₂ :=
begin
rcases refl_trans_gen_iff_eq_or_trans_gen.1 ab with rfl | ab,
{ exact ⟨_, aa, refl_trans_gen.refl⟩ },
{ exact let ⟨b₂, bb, h⟩ := tr_reaches₁ H aa ab in
⟨b₂, bb, h.to_refl⟩ }
end
theorem tr_reaches_rev {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop}
(H : respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂} (aa : tr a₁ a₂) {b₂} (ab : reaches f₂ a₂ b₂) :
∃ c₁ c₂, reaches f₂ b₂ c₂ ∧ tr c₁ c₂ ∧ reaches f₁ a₁ c₁ :=
begin
induction ab with c₂ d₂ ac cd IH,
{ exact ⟨_, _, refl_trans_gen.refl, aa, refl_trans_gen.refl⟩ },
{ rcases IH with ⟨e₁, e₂, ce, ee, ae⟩,
rcases refl_trans_gen.cases_head ce with rfl | ⟨d', cd', de⟩,
{ have := H ee, revert this,
cases eg : f₁ e₁ with g₁; simp only [respects, and_imp, exists_imp_distrib],
{ intro c0, cases cd.symm.trans c0 },
{ intros g₂ gg cg,
rcases trans_gen.head'_iff.1 cg with ⟨d', cd', dg⟩,
cases option.mem_unique cd cd',
exact ⟨_, _, dg, gg, ae.tail eg⟩ } },
{ cases option.mem_unique cd cd',
exact ⟨_, _, de, ee, ae⟩ } }
end
theorem tr_eval {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop}
(H : respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ b₁ a₂} (aa : tr a₁ a₂)
(ab : b₁ ∈ eval f₁ a₁) : ∃ b₂, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ b₂ ∈ eval f₂ a₂ :=
begin
cases mem_eval.1 ab with ab b0,
rcases tr_reaches H aa ab with ⟨b₂, bb, ab⟩,
refine ⟨_, bb, mem_eval.2 ⟨ab, _⟩⟩,
have := H bb, rwa b0 at this
end
theorem tr_eval_rev {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop}
(H : respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ b₂ a₂} (aa : tr a₁ a₂)
(ab : b₂ ∈ eval f₂ a₂) : ∃ b₁, tr b₁ b₂ ∧ b₁ ∈ eval f₁ a₁ :=
begin
cases mem_eval.1 ab with ab b0,
rcases tr_reaches_rev H aa ab with ⟨c₁, c₂, bc, cc, ac⟩,
cases (refl_trans_gen_iff_eq
(by exact option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.1 b0)).1 bc,
refine ⟨_, cc, mem_eval.2 ⟨ac, _⟩⟩,
have := H cc, cases f₁ c₁ with d₁, {refl},
rcases this with ⟨d₂, dd, bd⟩,
rcases trans_gen.head'_iff.1 bd with ⟨e, h, _⟩,
cases b0.symm.trans h
end
theorem tr_eval_dom {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop}
(H : respects f₁ f₂ tr) {a₁ a₂} (aa : tr a₁ a₂) :
(eval f₂ a₂).dom ↔ (eval f₁ a₁).dom :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨b₂, tr, h, _⟩ := tr_eval_rev H aa ⟨h, rfl⟩ in h,
λ h, let ⟨b₂, tr, h, _⟩ := tr_eval H aa ⟨h, rfl⟩ in h⟩
/-- A simpler version of `respects` when the state transition relation `tr` is a function. -/
def frespects {σ₁ σ₂} (f₂ : σ₂ → option σ₂) (tr : σ₁ → σ₂) (a₂ : σ₂) : option σ₁ → Prop
| (some b₁) := reaches₁ f₂ a₂ (tr b₁)
| none := f₂ a₂ = none
theorem frespects_eq {σ₁ σ₂} {f₂ : σ₂ → option σ₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂} {a₂ b₂}
(h : f₂ a₂ = f₂ b₂) : ∀ {b₁}, frespects f₂ tr a₂ b₁ ↔ frespects f₂ tr b₂ b₁
| (some b₁) := reaches₁_eq h
| none := by unfold frespects; rw h
theorem fun_respects {σ₁ σ₂ f₁ f₂} {tr : σ₁ → σ₂} :
respects f₁ f₂ (λ a b, tr a = b) ↔ ∀ ⦃a₁⦄, frespects f₂ tr (tr a₁) (f₁ a₁) :=
forall_congr $ λ a₁, by cases f₁ a₁; simp only [frespects, respects, exists_eq_left', forall_eq']
theorem tr_eval' {σ₁ σ₂}
(f₁ : σ₁ → option σ₁) (f₂ : σ₂ → option σ₂) (tr : σ₁ → σ₂)
(H : respects f₁ f₂ (λ a b, tr a = b))
(a₁) : eval f₂ (tr a₁) = tr <$> eval f₁ a₁ :=
roption.ext $ λ b₂,
⟨λ h, let ⟨b₁, bb, hb⟩ := tr_eval_rev H rfl h in
(roption.mem_map_iff _).2 ⟨b₁, hb, bb⟩,
λ h, begin
rcases (roption.mem_map_iff _).1 h with ⟨b₁, ab, bb⟩,
rcases tr_eval H rfl ab with ⟨_, rfl, h⟩,
rwa bb at h
end⟩
/-!
## The TM0 model
A TM0 turing machine is essentially a Post-Turing machine, adapted for type theory.
A Post-Turing machine with symbol type `Γ` and label type `Λ` is a function
`Λ → Γ → option (Λ × stmt)`, where a `stmt` can be either `move left`, `move right` or `write a`
for `a : Γ`. The machine works over a "tape", a doubly-infinite sequence of elements of `Γ`, and
an instantaneous configuration, `cfg`, is a label `q : Λ` indicating the current internal state of
the machine, and a `tape Γ` (which is essentially `ℤ →₀ Γ`). The evolution is described by the
`step` function:
* If `M q T.head = none`, then the machine halts.
* If `M q T.head = some (q', s)`, then the machine performs action `s : stmt` and then transitions
to state `q'`.
The initial state takes a `list Γ` and produces a `tape Γ` where the head of the list is the head
of the tape and the rest of the list extends to the right, with the left side all blank. The final
state takes the entire right side of the tape right or equal to the current position of the
machine. (This is actually a `list_blank Γ`, not a `list Γ`, because we don't know, at this level
of generality, where the output ends. If equality to `default Γ` is decidable we can trim the list
to remove the infinite tail of blanks.)
-/
namespace TM0
section
parameters (Γ : Type*) [inhabited Γ] -- type of tape symbols
parameters (Λ : Type*) [inhabited Λ] -- type of "labels" or TM states
/-- A Turing machine "statement" is just a command to either move
left or right, or write a symbol on the tape. -/
inductive stmt
| move : dir → stmt
| write : Γ → stmt
instance stmt.inhabited : inhabited stmt := ⟨stmt.write (default _)⟩
/-- A Post-Turing machine with symbol type `Γ` and label type `Λ`
is a function which, given the current state `q : Λ` and
the tape head `a : Γ`, either halts (returns `none`) or returns
a new state `q' : Λ` and a `stmt` describing what to do,
either a move left or right, or a write command.
Both `Λ` and `Γ` are required to be inhabited; the default value
for `Γ` is the "blank" tape value, and the default value of `Λ` is
the initial state. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments] -- [inhabited Λ]: this is a deliberate addition, see comment
def machine := Λ → Γ → option (Λ × stmt)
instance machine.inhabited : inhabited machine := by unfold machine; apply_instance
/-- The configuration state of a Turing machine during operation
consists of a label (machine state), and a tape, represented in
the form `(a, L, R)` meaning the tape looks like `L.rev ++ [a] ++ R`
with the machine currently reading the `a`. The lists are
automatically extended with blanks as the machine moves around. -/
structure cfg :=
(q : Λ)
(tape : tape Γ)
instance cfg.inhabited : inhabited cfg := ⟨⟨default _, default _⟩⟩
parameters {Γ Λ}
/-- Execution semantics of the Turing machine. -/
def step (M : machine) : cfg → option cfg
| ⟨q, T⟩ := (M q T.1).map (λ ⟨q', a⟩, ⟨q',
match a with
| stmt.move d := T.move d
| stmt.write a := T.write a
end⟩)
/-- The statement `reaches M s₁ s₂` means that `s₂` is obtained
starting from `s₁` after a finite number of steps from `s₂`. -/
def reaches (M : machine) : cfg → cfg → Prop :=
refl_trans_gen (λ a b, b ∈ step M a)
/-- The initial configuration. -/
def init (l : list Γ) : cfg :=
⟨default Λ, tape.mk₁ l⟩
/-- Evaluate a Turing machine on initial input to a final state,
if it terminates. -/
def eval (M : machine) (l : list Γ) : roption (list_blank Γ) :=
(eval (step M) (init l)).map (λ c, c.tape.right₀)
/-- The raw definition of a Turing machine does not require that
`Γ` and `Λ` are finite, and in practice we will be interested
in the infinite `Λ` case. We recover instead a notion of
"effectively finite" Turing machines, which only make use of a
finite subset of their states. We say that a set `S ⊆ Λ`
supports a Turing machine `M` if `S` is closed under the
transition function and contains the initial state. -/
def supports (M : machine) (S : set Λ) :=
default Λ ∈ S ∧ ∀ {q a q' s}, (q', s) ∈ M q a → q ∈ S → q' ∈ S
theorem step_supports (M : machine) {S}
(ss : supports M S) : ∀ {c c' : cfg},
c' ∈ step M c → c.q ∈ S → c'.q ∈ S
| ⟨q, T⟩ c' h₁ h₂ := begin
rcases option.map_eq_some'.1 h₁ with ⟨⟨q', a⟩, h, rfl⟩,
exact ss.2 h h₂,
end
theorem univ_supports (M : machine) : supports M set.univ :=
⟨trivial, λ q a q' s h₁ h₂, trivial⟩
end
section
variables {Γ : Type*} [inhabited Γ]
variables {Γ' : Type*} [inhabited Γ']
variables {Λ : Type*} [inhabited Λ]
variables {Λ' : Type*} [inhabited Λ']
/-- Map a TM statement across a function. This does nothing to move statements and maps the write
values. -/
def stmt.map (f : pointed_map Γ Γ') : stmt Γ → stmt Γ'
| (stmt.move d) := stmt.move d
| (stmt.write a) := stmt.write (f a)
/-- Map a configuration across a function, given `f : Γ → Γ'` a map of the alphabets and
`g : Λ → Λ'` a map of the machine states. -/
def cfg.map (f : pointed_map Γ Γ') (g : Λ → Λ') : cfg Γ Λ → cfg Γ' Λ'
| ⟨q, T⟩ := ⟨g q, T.map f⟩
variables (M : machine Γ Λ)
(f₁ : pointed_map Γ Γ') (f₂ : pointed_map Γ' Γ) (g₁ : Λ → Λ') (g₂ : Λ' → Λ)
/-- Because the state transition function uses the alphabet and machine states in both the input
and output, to map a machine from one alphabet and machine state space to another we need functions
in both directions, essentially an `equiv` without the laws. -/
def machine.map : machine Γ' Λ'
| q l := (M (g₂ q) (f₂ l)).map (prod.map g₁ (stmt.map f₁))
theorem machine.map_step {S : set Λ}
(f₂₁ : function.right_inverse f₁ f₂)
(g₂₁ : ∀ q ∈ S, g₂ (g₁ q) = q) :
∀ c : cfg Γ Λ, c.q ∈ S →
(step M c).map (cfg.map f₁ g₁) =
step (M.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂) (cfg.map f₁ g₁ c)
| ⟨q, T⟩ h := begin
unfold step machine.map cfg.map,
simp only [turing.tape.map_fst, g₂₁ q h, f₂₁ _],
rcases M q T.1 with _|⟨q', d|a⟩, {refl},
{ simp only [step, cfg.map, option.map_some', tape.map_move f₁], refl },
{ simp only [step, cfg.map, option.map_some', tape.map_write], refl }
end
theorem map_init (g₁ : pointed_map Λ Λ') (l : list Γ) :
(init l).map f₁ g₁ = init (l.map f₁) :=
congr (congr_arg cfg.mk g₁.map_pt) (tape.map_mk₁ _ _)
theorem machine.map_respects
(g₁ : pointed_map Λ Λ') (g₂ : Λ' → Λ)
{S} (ss : supports M S)
(f₂₁ : function.right_inverse f₁ f₂)
(g₂₁ : ∀ q ∈ S, g₂ (g₁ q) = q) :
respects (step M) (step (M.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂))
(λ a b, a.q ∈ S ∧ cfg.map f₁ g₁ a = b)
| c _ ⟨cs, rfl⟩ := begin
cases e : step M c with c'; unfold respects,
{ rw [← M.map_step f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ f₂₁ g₂₁ _ cs, e], refl },
{ refine ⟨_, ⟨step_supports M ss e cs, rfl⟩, trans_gen.single _⟩,
rw [← M.map_step f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ f₂₁ g₂₁ _ cs, e], exact rfl }
end
end
end TM0
/-!
## The TM1 model
The TM1 model is a simplification and extension of TM0 (Post-Turing model) in the direction of
Wang B-machines. The machine's internal state is extended with a (finite) store `σ` of variables
that may be accessed and updated at any time.
A machine is given by a `Λ` indexed set of procedures or functions. Each function has a body which
is a `stmt`. Most of the regular commands are allowed to use the current value `a` of the local
variables and the value `T.head` on the tape to calculate what to write or how to change local
state, but the statements themselves have a fixed structure. The `stmt`s can be as follows:
* `move d q`: move left or right, and then do `q`
* `write (f : Γ → σ → Γ) q`: write `f a T.head` to the tape, then do `q`
* `load (f : Γ → σ → σ) q`: change the internal state to `f a T.head`
* `branch (f : Γ → σ → bool) qtrue qfalse`: If `f a T.head` is true, do `qtrue`, else `qfalse`
* `goto (f : Γ → σ → Λ)`: Go to label `f a T.head`
* `halt`: Transition to the halting state, which halts on the following step
Note that here most statements do not have labels; `goto` commands can only go to a new function.
Only the `goto` and `halt` statements actually take a step; the rest is done by recursion on
statements and so take 0 steps. (There is a uniform bound on many statements can be executed before
the next `goto`, so this is an `O(1)` speedup with the constant depending on the machine.)
The `halt` command has a one step stutter before actually halting so that any changes made before
the halt have a chance to be "committed", since the `eval` relation uses the final configuration
before the halt as the output, and `move` and `write` etc. take 0 steps in this model.
-/
namespace TM1
section
parameters (Γ : Type*) [inhabited Γ] -- Type of tape symbols
parameters (Λ : Type*) -- Type of function labels
parameters (σ : Type*) -- Type of variable settings
/-- The TM1 model is a simplification and extension of TM0
(Post-Turing model) in the direction of Wang B-machines. The machine's
internal state is extended with a (finite) store `σ` of variables
that may be accessed and updated at any time.
A machine is given by a `Λ` indexed set of procedures or functions.
Each function has a body which is a `stmt`, which can either be a
`move` or `write` command, a `branch` (if statement based on the
current tape value), a `load` (set the variable value),
a `goto` (call another function), or `halt`. Note that here
most statements do not have labels; `goto` commands can only
go to a new function. All commands have access to the variable value
and current tape value. -/
inductive stmt
| move : dir → stmt → stmt
| write : (Γ → σ → Γ) → stmt → stmt
| load : (Γ → σ → σ) → stmt → stmt
| branch : (Γ → σ → bool) → stmt → stmt → stmt
| goto : (Γ → σ → Λ) → stmt
| halt : stmt
open stmt
instance stmt.inhabited : inhabited stmt := ⟨halt⟩
/-- The configuration of a TM1 machine is given by the currently
evaluating statement, the variable store value, and the tape. -/
structure cfg :=
(l : option Λ)
(var : σ)
(tape : tape Γ)
instance cfg.inhabited [inhabited σ] : inhabited cfg := ⟨⟨default _, default _, default _⟩⟩
parameters {Γ Λ σ}
/-- The semantics of TM1 evaluation. -/
def step_aux : stmt → σ → tape Γ → cfg
| (move d q) v T := step_aux q v (T.move d)
| (write a q) v T := step_aux q v (T.write (a T.1 v))
| (load s q) v T := step_aux q (s T.1 v) T
| (branch p q₁ q₂) v T := cond (p T.1 v) (step_aux q₁ v T) (step_aux q₂ v T)
| (goto l) v T := ⟨some (l T.1 v), v, T⟩
| halt v T := ⟨none, v, T⟩
/-- The state transition function. -/
def step (M : Λ → stmt) : cfg → option cfg
| ⟨none, v, T⟩ := none
| ⟨some l, v, T⟩ := some (step_aux (M l) v T)
/-- A set `S` of labels supports the statement `q` if all the `goto`
statements in `q` refer only to other functions in `S`. -/
def supports_stmt (S : finset Λ) : stmt → Prop
| (move d q) := supports_stmt q
| (write a q) := supports_stmt q
| (load s q) := supports_stmt q
| (branch p q₁ q₂) := supports_stmt q₁ ∧ supports_stmt q₂
| (goto l) := ∀ a v, l a v ∈ S
| halt := true
open_locale classical
/-- The subterm closure of a statement. -/
noncomputable def stmts₁ : stmt → finset stmt
| Q@(move d q) := insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(write a q) := insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(load s q) := insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(branch p q₁ q₂) := insert Q (stmts₁ q₁ ∪ stmts₁ q₂)
| Q := {Q}
theorem stmts₁_self {q} : q ∈ stmts₁ q :=
by cases q; apply_rules [finset.mem_insert_self, finset.mem_singleton_self]
theorem stmts₁_trans {q₁ q₂} :
q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂ → stmts₁ q₁ ⊆ stmts₁ q₂ :=
begin
intros h₁₂ q₀ h₀₁,
induction q₂ with _ q IH _ q IH _ q IH;
simp only [stmts₁] at h₁₂ ⊢;
simp only [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_union, finset.mem_singleton] at h₁₂,
iterate 3 {
rcases h₁₂ with rfl | h₁₂,
{ unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁, exact h₀₁ },
{ exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem (IH h₁₂) } },
case TM1.stmt.branch : p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ {
rcases h₁₂ with rfl | h₁₂ | h₁₂,
{ unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁, exact h₀₁ },
{ exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_union_left _ $ IH₁ h₁₂) },
{ exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_union_right _ $ IH₂ h₁₂) } },
case TM1.stmt.goto : l {
subst h₁₂, exact h₀₁ },
case TM1.stmt.halt {
subst h₁₂, exact h₀₁ }
end
theorem stmts₁_supports_stmt_mono {S q₁ q₂}
(h : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂) (hs : supports_stmt S q₂) : supports_stmt S q₁ :=
begin
induction q₂ with _ q IH _ q IH _ q IH;
simp only [stmts₁, supports_stmt, finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_union,
finset.mem_singleton] at h hs,
iterate 3 { rcases h with rfl | h; [exact hs, exact IH h hs] },
case TM1.stmt.branch : p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ {
rcases h with rfl | h | h, exacts [hs, IH₁ h hs.1, IH₂ h hs.2] },
case TM1.stmt.goto : l { subst h, exact hs },
case TM1.stmt.halt { subst h, trivial }
end
/-- The set of all statements in a turing machine, plus one extra value `none` representing the
halt state. This is used in the TM1 to TM0 reduction. -/
noncomputable def stmts (M : Λ → stmt) (S : finset Λ) : finset (option stmt) :=
(S.bind (λ q, stmts₁ (M q))).insert_none
theorem stmts_trans {M : Λ → stmt} {S q₁ q₂}
(h₁ : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂) : some q₂ ∈ stmts M S → some q₁ ∈ stmts M S :=
by simp only [stmts, finset.mem_insert_none, finset.mem_bind,
option.mem_def, forall_eq', exists_imp_distrib];
exact λ l ls h₂, ⟨_, ls, stmts₁_trans h₂ h₁⟩
variable [inhabited Λ]
/-- A set `S` of labels supports machine `M` if all the `goto`
statements in the functions in `S` refer only to other functions
in `S`. -/
def supports (M : Λ → stmt) (S : finset Λ) :=
default Λ ∈ S ∧ ∀ q ∈ S, supports_stmt S (M q)
theorem stmts_supports_stmt {M : Λ → stmt} {S q}
(ss : supports M S) : some q ∈ stmts M S → supports_stmt S q :=
by simp only [stmts, finset.mem_insert_none, finset.mem_bind,
option.mem_def, forall_eq', exists_imp_distrib];
exact λ l ls h, stmts₁_supports_stmt_mono h (ss.2 _ ls)
theorem step_supports (M : Λ → stmt) {S}
(ss : supports M S) : ∀ {c c' : cfg},
c' ∈ step M c → c.l ∈ S.insert_none → c'.l ∈ S.insert_none
| ⟨some l₁, v, T⟩ c' h₁ h₂ := begin
replace h₂ := ss.2 _ (finset.some_mem_insert_none.1 h₂),
simp only [step, option.mem_def] at h₁, subst c',
revert h₂, induction M l₁ with _ q IH _ q IH _ q IH generalizing v T;
intro hs,
iterate 3 { exact IH _ _ hs },
case TM1.stmt.branch : p q₁' q₂' IH₁ IH₂ {
unfold step_aux, cases p T.1 v,
{ exact IH₂ _ _ hs.2 },
{ exact IH₁ _ _ hs.1 } },
case TM1.stmt.goto { exact finset.some_mem_insert_none.2 (hs _ _) },
case TM1.stmt.halt { apply multiset.mem_cons_self }
end
variable [inhabited σ]
/-- The initial state, given a finite input that is placed on the tape starting at the TM head and
going to the right. -/
def init (l : list Γ) : cfg :=
⟨some (default _), default _, tape.mk₁ l⟩
/-- Evaluate a TM to completion, resulting in an output list on the tape (with an indeterminate
number of blanks on the end). -/
def eval (M : Λ → stmt) (l : list Γ) : roption (list_blank Γ) :=
(eval (step M) (init l)).map (λ c, c.tape.right₀)
end
end TM1
/-!
## TM1 emulator in TM0
To prove that TM1 computable functions are TM0 computable, we need to reduce each TM1 program to a
TM0 program. So suppose a TM1 program is given. We take the following:
* The alphabet `Γ` is the same for both TM1 and TM0
* The set of states `Λ'` is defined to be `option stmt₁ × σ`, that is, a TM1 statement or `none`
representing halt, and the possible settings of the internal variables.
Note that this is an infinite set, because `stmt₁` is infinite. This is okay because we assume
that from the initial TM1 state, only finitely many other labels are reachable, and there are
only finitely many statements that appear in all of these functions.
Even though `stmt₁` contains a statement called `halt`, we must separate it from `none`
(`some halt` steps to `none` and `none` actually halts) because there is a one step stutter in the
TM1 semantics.
-/
namespace TM1to0
section
parameters {Γ : Type*} [inhabited Γ]
parameters {Λ : Type*} [inhabited Λ]
parameters {σ : Type*} [inhabited σ]
local notation `stmt₁` := TM1.stmt Γ Λ σ
local notation `cfg₁` := TM1.cfg Γ Λ σ
local notation `stmt₀` := TM0.stmt Γ
parameters (M : Λ → stmt₁)
include M
/-- The base machine state space is a pair of an `option stmt₁` representing the current program
to be executed, or `none` for the halt state, and a `σ` which is the local state (stored in the TM,
not the tape). Because there are an infinite number of programs, this state space is infinite, but
for a finitely supported TM1 machine and a finite type `σ`, only finitely many of these states are
reachable. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments] -- [inhabited Λ] [inhabited σ] (M : Λ → stmt₁): We need the M assumption
-- because of the inhabited instance, but we could avoid the inhabited instances on Λ and σ here.
-- But they are parameters so we cannot easily skip them for just this definition.
def Λ' := option stmt₁ × σ
instance : inhabited Λ' := ⟨(some (M (default _)), default _)⟩
open TM0.stmt
/-- The core TM1 → TM0 translation function. Here `s` is the current value on the tape, and the
`stmt₁` is the TM1 statement to translate, with local state `v : σ`. We evaluate all regular
instructions recursively until we reach either a `move` or `write` command, or a `goto`; in the
latter case we emit a dummy `write s` step and transition to the new target location. -/
def tr_aux (s : Γ) : stmt₁ → σ → Λ' × stmt₀
| (TM1.stmt.move d q) v := ((some q, v), move d)
| (TM1.stmt.write a q) v := ((some q, v), write (a s v))
| (TM1.stmt.load a q) v := tr_aux q (a s v)
| (TM1.stmt.branch p q₁ q₂) v := cond (p s v) (tr_aux q₁ v) (tr_aux q₂ v)
| (TM1.stmt.goto l) v := ((some (M (l s v)), v), write s)
| TM1.stmt.halt v := ((none, v), write s)
local notation `cfg₀` := TM0.cfg Γ Λ'
/-- The translated TM0 machine (given the TM1 machine input). -/
def tr : TM0.machine Γ Λ'
| (none, v) s := none
| (some q, v) s := some (tr_aux s q v)
/-- Translate configurations from TM1 to TM0. -/
def tr_cfg : cfg₁ → cfg₀
| ⟨l, v, T⟩ := ⟨(l.map M, v), T⟩
theorem tr_respects : respects (TM1.step M) (TM0.step tr)
(λ c₁ c₂, tr_cfg c₁ = c₂) :=
fun_respects.2 $ λ ⟨l₁, v, T⟩, begin
cases l₁ with l₁, {exact rfl},
unfold tr_cfg TM1.step frespects option.map function.comp option.bind,
induction M l₁ with _ q IH _ q IH _ q IH generalizing v T,
case TM1.stmt.move : d q IH { exact trans_gen.head rfl (IH _ _) },
case TM1.stmt.write : a q IH { exact trans_gen.head rfl (IH _ _) },
case TM1.stmt.load : a q IH { exact (reaches₁_eq (by refl)).2 (IH _ _) },
case TM1.stmt.branch : p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ {
unfold TM1.step_aux, cases e : p T.1 v,
{ exact (reaches₁_eq (by simp only [TM0.step, tr, tr_aux, e]; refl)).2 (IH₂ _ _) },
{ exact (reaches₁_eq (by simp only [TM0.step, tr, tr_aux, e]; refl)).2 (IH₁ _ _) } },
iterate 2 {
exact trans_gen.single (congr_arg some
(congr (congr_arg TM0.cfg.mk rfl) (tape.write_self T))) }
end
theorem tr_eval (l : list Γ) : TM0.eval tr l = TM1.eval M l :=
(congr_arg _ (tr_eval' _ _ _ tr_respects ⟨some _, _, _⟩)).trans begin
rw [roption.map_eq_map, roption.map_map, TM1.eval],
congr', ext ⟨⟩, refl
end
variables [fintype σ]
/-- Given a finite set of accessible `Λ` machine states, there is a finite set of accessible
machine states in the target (even though the type `Λ'` is infinite). -/
noncomputable def tr_stmts (S : finset Λ) : finset Λ' :=
(TM1.stmts M S).product finset.univ
open_locale classical
local attribute [simp] TM1.stmts₁_self
theorem tr_supports {S : finset Λ} (ss : TM1.supports M S) :
TM0.supports tr (↑(tr_stmts S)) :=
⟨finset.mem_product.2 ⟨finset.some_mem_insert_none.2
(finset.mem_bind.2 ⟨_, ss.1, TM1.stmts₁_self⟩),
finset.mem_univ _⟩,
λ q a q' s h₁ h₂, begin
rcases q with ⟨_|q, v⟩, {cases h₁},
cases q' with q' v', simp only [tr_stmts, finset.mem_coe,
finset.mem_product, finset.mem_univ, and_true] at h₂ ⊢,
cases q', {exact multiset.mem_cons_self _ _},
simp only [tr, option.mem_def] at h₁,
have := TM1.stmts_supports_stmt ss h₂,
revert this, induction q generalizing v; intro hs,
case TM1.stmt.move : d q {
cases h₁, refine TM1.stmts_trans _ h₂,
unfold TM1.stmts₁,
exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem TM1.stmts₁_self },
case TM1.stmt.write : b q {
cases h₁, refine TM1.stmts_trans _ h₂,
unfold TM1.stmts₁,
exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem TM1.stmts₁_self },
case TM1.stmt.load : b q IH {
refine IH (TM1.stmts_trans _ h₂) _ h₁ hs,
unfold TM1.stmts₁,
exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem TM1.stmts₁_self },
case TM1.stmt.branch : p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ {
change cond (p a v) _ _ = ((some q', v'), s) at h₁,
cases p a v,
{ refine IH₂ (TM1.stmts_trans _ h₂) _ h₁ hs.2,
unfold TM1.stmts₁,
exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_union_right _ TM1.stmts₁_self) },
{ refine IH₁ (TM1.stmts_trans _ h₂) _ h₁ hs.1,
unfold TM1.stmts₁,
exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_union_left _ TM1.stmts₁_self) } },
case TM1.stmt.goto : l {
cases h₁, exact finset.some_mem_insert_none.2
(finset.mem_bind.2 ⟨_, hs _ _, TM1.stmts₁_self⟩) },
case TM1.stmt.halt { cases h₁ }
end⟩
end
end TM1to0
/-!
## TM1(Γ) emulator in TM1(bool)
The most parsimonious Turing machine model that is still Turing complete is `TM0` with `Γ = bool`.
Because our construction in the previous section reducing `TM1` to `TM0` doesn't change the
alphabet, we can do the alphabet reduction on `TM1` instead of `TM0` directly.
The basic idea is to use a bijection between `Γ` and a subset of `vector bool n`, where `n` is a
fixed constant. Each tape element is represented as a block of `n` bools. Whenever the machine
wants to read a symbol from the tape, it traverses over the block, performing `n` `branch`
instructions to each any of the `2^n` results.
For the `write` instruction, we have to use a `goto` because we need to follow a different code
path depending on the local state, which is not available in the TM1 model, so instead we jump to
a label computed using the read value and the local state, which performs the writing and returns
to normal execution.
Emulation overhead is `O(1)`. If not for the above `write` behavior it would be 1-1 because we are
exploiting the 0-step behavior of regular commands to avoid taking steps, but there are
nevertheless a bounded number of `write` calls between `goto` statements because TM1 statements are
finitely long.
-/
namespace TM1to1
open TM1
section
parameters {Γ : Type*} [inhabited Γ]
theorem exists_enc_dec [fintype Γ] :
∃ n (enc : Γ → vector bool n) (dec : vector bool n → Γ),
enc (default _) = vector.repeat ff n ∧ ∀ a, dec (enc a) = a :=
begin
rcases fintype.exists_equiv_fin Γ with ⟨n, ⟨F⟩⟩,
let G : fin n ↪ fin n → bool := ⟨λ a b, a = b,
λ a b h, of_to_bool_true $ (congr_fun h b).trans $ to_bool_tt rfl⟩,
let H := (F.to_embedding.trans G).trans
(equiv.vector_equiv_fin _ _).symm.to_embedding,
classical,
let enc := H.set_value (default _) (vector.repeat ff n),
exact ⟨_, enc, function.inv_fun enc,
H.set_value_eq _ _, function.left_inverse_inv_fun enc.2⟩
end
parameters {Λ : Type*} [inhabited Λ]
parameters {σ : Type*} [inhabited σ]
local notation `stmt₁` := stmt Γ Λ σ
local notation `cfg₁` := cfg Γ Λ σ
/-- The configuration state of the TM. -/
inductive Λ' : Type (max u_1 u_2 u_3)
| normal : Λ → Λ'
| write : Γ → stmt₁ → Λ'
instance : inhabited Λ' := ⟨Λ'.normal (default _)⟩
local notation `stmt'` := stmt bool Λ' σ
local notation `cfg'` := cfg bool Λ' σ
/-- Read a vector of length `n` from the tape. -/
def read_aux : ∀ n, (vector bool n → stmt') → stmt'
| 0 f := f vector.nil
| (i+1) f := stmt.branch (λ a s, a)
(stmt.move dir.right $ read_aux i (λ v, f (tt :: v)))
(stmt.move dir.right $ read_aux i (λ v, f (ff :: v)))
parameters {n : ℕ} (enc : Γ → vector bool n) (dec : vector bool n → Γ)
/-- A move left or right corresponds to `n` moves across the super-cell. -/
def move (d : dir) (q : stmt') : stmt' := (stmt.move d)^[n] q
/-- To read a symbol from the tape, we use `read_aux` to traverse the symbol,
then return to the original position with `n` moves to the left. -/
def read (f : Γ → stmt') : stmt' :=
read_aux n (λ v, move dir.left $ f (dec v))
/-- Write a list of bools on the tape. -/
def write : list bool → stmt' → stmt'
| [] q := q
| (a :: l) q := stmt.write (λ _ _, a) $ stmt.move dir.right $ write l q
/-- Translate a normal instruction. For the `write` command, we use a `goto` indirection so that
we can access the current value of the tape. -/
def tr_normal : stmt₁ → stmt'
| (stmt.move d q) := move d $ tr_normal q
| (stmt.write f q) := read $ λ a, stmt.goto $ λ _ s, Λ'.write (f a s) q
| (stmt.load f q) := read $ λ a, stmt.load (λ _ s, f a s) $ tr_normal q
| (stmt.branch p q₁ q₂) := read $ λ a, stmt.branch (λ _ s, p a s) (tr_normal q₁) (tr_normal q₂)
| (stmt.goto l) := read $ λ a, stmt.goto $ λ _ s, Λ'.normal (l a s)
| stmt.halt := stmt.halt
theorem step_aux_move (d q v T) :
step_aux (move d q) v T =
step_aux q v ((tape.move d)^[n] T) :=
begin
suffices : ∀ i,
step_aux (stmt.move d^[i] q) v T =
step_aux q v (tape.move d^[i] T), from this n,
intro, induction i with i IH generalizing T, {refl},
rw [nat.iterate_succ', step_aux, IH, nat.iterate_succ]
end
theorem supports_stmt_move {S d q} :
supports_stmt S (move d q) = supports_stmt S q :=
suffices ∀ {i}, supports_stmt S (stmt.move d^[i] q) = _, from this,
by intro; induction i generalizing q; simp only [*, nat.iterate]; refl
theorem supports_stmt_write {S l q} :
supports_stmt S (write l q) = supports_stmt S q :=
by induction l with a l IH; simp only [write, supports_stmt, *]
theorem supports_stmt_read {S} : ∀ {f : Γ → stmt'},
(∀ a, supports_stmt S (f a)) → supports_stmt S (read f) :=
suffices ∀ i (f : vector bool i → stmt'),
(∀ v, supports_stmt S (f v)) → supports_stmt S (read_aux i f),
from λ f hf, this n _ (by intro; simp only [supports_stmt_move, hf]),
λ i f hf, begin
induction i with i IH, {exact hf _},
split; apply IH; intro; apply hf,
end
parameter (enc0 : enc (default _) = vector.repeat ff n)
section
parameter {enc}
include enc0
/-- The low level tape corresponding to the given tape over alphabet `Γ`. -/
def tr_tape' (L R : list_blank Γ) : tape bool :=
begin
refine tape.mk'
(L.bind (λ x, (enc x).to_list.reverse) ⟨n, _⟩)
(R.bind (λ x, (enc x).to_list) ⟨n, _⟩);
simp only [enc0, vector.repeat,
list.reverse_repeat, bool.default_bool, vector.to_list_mk]
end
/-- The low level tape corresponding to the given tape over alphabet `Γ`. -/
def tr_tape (T : tape Γ) : tape bool := tr_tape' T.left T.right₀
theorem tr_tape_mk' (L R : list_blank Γ) : tr_tape (tape.mk' L R) = tr_tape' L R :=
by simp only [tr_tape, tape.mk'_left, tape.mk'_right₀]
end
parameters (M : Λ → stmt₁)
/-- The top level program. -/
def tr : Λ' → stmt'
| (Λ'.normal l) := tr_normal (M l)
| (Λ'.write a q) := write (enc a).to_list $ move dir.left $ tr_normal q
/-- The machine configuration translation. -/
def tr_cfg : cfg₁ → cfg'
| ⟨l, v, T⟩ := ⟨l.map Λ'.normal, v, tr_tape T⟩
parameter {enc}
include enc0
theorem tr_tape'_move_left (L R) :
(tape.move dir.left)^[n] (tr_tape' L R) =
(tr_tape' L.tail (R.cons L.head)) :=
begin
obtain ⟨a, L, rfl⟩ := L.exists_cons,
simp only [tr_tape', list_blank.cons_bind, list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.tail_cons],
suffices : ∀ {L' R' l₁ l₂}
(e : vector.to_list (enc a) = list.reverse_core l₁ l₂),
tape.move dir.left^[l₁.length]
(tape.mk' (list_blank.append l₁ L') (list_blank.append l₂ R')) =
tape.mk' L' (list_blank.append (vector.to_list (enc a)) R'),
{ simpa only [list.length_reverse, vector.to_list_length]
using this (list.reverse_reverse _).symm },
intros, induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l₂,
{ cases e, refl },
simp only [list.length, list.cons_append, nat.iterate_succ_apply],
convert IH e,
simp only [list_blank.tail_cons, list_blank.append, tape.move_left_mk', list_blank.head_cons]
end
theorem tr_tape'_move_right (L R) :
(tape.move dir.right)^[n] (tr_tape' L R) =
(tr_tape' (L.cons R.head) R.tail) :=
begin
suffices : ∀ i L, (tape.move dir.right)^[i] ((tape.move dir.left)^[i] L) = L,
{ refine (eq.symm _).trans (this n _),
simp only [tr_tape'_move_left, list_blank.cons_head_tail,
list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.tail_cons] },
intros, induction i with i IH, {refl},
rw [nat.iterate_succ_apply, nat.iterate_succ_apply', tape.move_left_right, IH]
end
theorem step_aux_write (q v a b L R) :
step_aux (write (enc a).to_list q) v (tr_tape' L (list_blank.cons b R)) =
step_aux q v (tr_tape' (list_blank.cons a L) R) :=
begin
simp only [tr_tape', list.cons_bind, list.append_assoc],
suffices : ∀ {L' R'} (l₁ l₂ l₂' : list bool)
(e : l₂'.length = l₂.length),
step_aux (write l₂ q) v (tape.mk' (list_blank.append l₁ L') (list_blank.append l₂' R')) =
step_aux q v (tape.mk' (L'.append (list.reverse_core l₂ l₁)) R'),
{ convert this [] _ _ ((enc b).2.trans (enc a).2.symm);
rw list_blank.cons_bind; refl },
clear a b L R, intros,
induction l₂ with a l₂ IH generalizing l₁ l₂',
{ cases list.length_eq_zero.1 e, refl },
cases l₂' with b l₂'; injection e with e,
dunfold write step_aux,
convert IH _ _ e, simp only [list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.tail_cons,
list_blank.append, tape.move_right_mk', tape.write_mk']
end
parameters (encdec : ∀ a, dec (enc a) = a)
include encdec
theorem step_aux_read (f v L R) :
step_aux (read f) v (tr_tape' L R) =
step_aux (f R.head) v (tr_tape' L R) :=
begin
suffices : ∀ f,
step_aux (read_aux n f) v (tr_tape' enc0 L R) =
step_aux (f (enc R.head)) v
(tr_tape' enc0 (L.cons R.head) R.tail),
{ rw [read, this, step_aux_move, encdec, tr_tape'_move_left enc0],
simp only [list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.cons_head_tail, list_blank.tail_cons] },
obtain ⟨a, R, rfl⟩ := R.exists_cons,
simp only [list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.tail_cons,
tr_tape', list_blank.cons_bind, list_blank.append_assoc],
suffices : ∀ i f L' R' l₁ l₂ h,
step_aux (read_aux i f) v
(tape.mk' (list_blank.append l₁ L') (list_blank.append l₂ R')) =
step_aux (f ⟨l₂, h⟩) v
(tape.mk' (list_blank.append (l₂.reverse_core l₁) L') R'),
{ intro f, convert this n f _ _ _ _ (enc a).2; simp },
clear f L a R, intros, subst i,
induction l₂ with a l₂ IH generalizing l₁, {refl},
transitivity step_aux
(read_aux l₂.length (λ v, f (a :: v))) v
(tape.mk' ((L'.append l₁).cons a) (R'.append l₂)),
{ dsimp [read_aux, step_aux], simp, cases a; refl },
rw [← list_blank.append, IH], refl
end
theorem tr_respects : respects (step M) (step tr)
(λ c₁ c₂, tr_cfg c₁ = c₂) :=
fun_respects.2 $ λ ⟨l₁, v, T⟩, begin
obtain ⟨L, R, rfl⟩ := T.exists_mk',
cases l₁ with l₁, {exact rfl},
suffices : ∀ q R, reaches (step (tr enc dec M))
(step_aux (tr_normal dec q) v (tr_tape' enc0 L R))
(tr_cfg enc0 (step_aux q v (tape.mk' L R))),
{ refine trans_gen.head' rfl _, rw tr_tape_mk', exact this _ R },
clear R l₁, intros,
induction q with _ q IH _ q IH _ q IH generalizing v L R,
case TM1.stmt.move : d q IH {
cases d; simp only [tr_normal, nat.iterate, step_aux_move, step_aux,
list_blank.head_cons, tape.move_left_mk',
list_blank.cons_head_tail, list_blank.tail_cons,
tr_tape'_move_left enc0, tr_tape'_move_right enc0];
apply IH },
case TM1.stmt.write : f q IH {
simp only [tr_normal, step_aux_read dec enc0 encdec, step_aux],
refine refl_trans_gen.head rfl _,
obtain ⟨a, R, rfl⟩ := R.exists_cons,
rw [tr, tape.mk'_head, step_aux_write, list_blank.head_cons,
step_aux_move, tr_tape'_move_left enc0, list_blank.head_cons,
list_blank.tail_cons, tape.write_mk'],
apply IH },
case TM1.stmt.load : a q IH {
simp only [tr_normal, step_aux_read dec enc0 encdec],
apply IH },
case TM1.stmt.branch : p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ {
simp only [tr_normal, step_aux_read dec enc0 encdec, step_aux],
cases p R.head v; [apply IH₂, apply IH₁] },
case TM1.stmt.goto : l {
simp only [tr_normal, step_aux_read dec enc0 encdec, step_aux, tr_cfg, tr_tape_mk'],
apply refl_trans_gen.refl },
case TM1.stmt.halt {
simp only [tr_normal, step_aux, tr_cfg, step_aux_move,
tr_tape'_move_left enc0, tr_tape'_move_right enc0, tr_tape_mk'],
apply refl_trans_gen.refl }
end
omit enc0 encdec
open_locale classical
parameters [fintype Γ]
/-- The set of accessible `Λ'.write` machine states. -/
noncomputable def writes : stmt₁ → finset Λ'
| (stmt.move d q) := writes q
| (stmt.write f q) := finset.univ.image (λ a, Λ'.write a q) ∪ writes q
| (stmt.load f q) := writes q
| (stmt.branch p q₁ q₂) := writes q₁ ∪ writes q₂
| (stmt.goto l) := ∅
| stmt.halt := ∅
/-- The set of accessible machine states, assuming that the input machine is supported on `S`,
are the normal states embedded from `S`, plus all write states accessible from these states. -/
noncomputable def tr_supp (S : finset Λ) : finset Λ' :=
S.bind (λ l, insert (Λ'.normal l) (writes (M l)))
theorem tr_supports {S} (ss : supports M S) :
supports tr (tr_supp S) :=
⟨finset.mem_bind.2 ⟨_, ss.1, finset.mem_insert_self _ _⟩,
λ q h, begin
suffices : ∀ q, supports_stmt S q →
(∀ q' ∈ writes q, q' ∈ tr_supp M S) →
supports_stmt (tr_supp M S) (tr_normal dec q) ∧
∀ q' ∈ writes q, supports_stmt (tr_supp M S) (tr enc dec M q'),
{ rcases finset.mem_bind.1 h with ⟨l, hl, h⟩,
have := this _ (ss.2 _ hl) (λ q' hq,
finset.mem_bind.2 ⟨_, hl, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hq⟩),
rcases finset.mem_insert.1 h with rfl | h,
exacts [this.1, this.2 _ h] },
intros q hs hw, induction q,
case TM1.stmt.move : d q IH {
unfold writes at hw ⊢,
replace IH := IH hs hw, refine ⟨_, IH.2⟩,
cases d; simp only [tr_normal, nat.iterate, supports_stmt_move, IH] },
case TM1.stmt.write : f q IH {
unfold writes at hw ⊢,
simp only [finset.mem_image, finset.mem_union, finset.mem_univ,
exists_prop, true_and] at hw ⊢,
replace IH := IH hs (λ q hq, hw q (or.inr hq)),
refine ⟨supports_stmt_read _ $ λ a _ s,
hw _ (or.inl ⟨_, rfl⟩), λ q' hq, _⟩,
rcases hq with ⟨a, q₂, rfl⟩ | hq,
{ simp only [tr, supports_stmt_write, supports_stmt_move, IH.1] },
{ exact IH.2 _ hq } },
case TM1.stmt.load : a q IH {
unfold writes at hw ⊢,
replace IH := IH hs hw,
refine ⟨supports_stmt_read _ (λ a, IH.1), IH.2⟩ },
case TM1.stmt.branch : p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ {
unfold writes at hw ⊢,
simp only [finset.mem_union] at hw ⊢,
replace IH₁ := IH₁ hs.1 (λ q hq, hw q (or.inl hq)),
replace IH₂ := IH₂ hs.2 (λ q hq, hw q (or.inr hq)),
exact ⟨supports_stmt_read _ (λ a, ⟨IH₁.1, IH₂.1⟩),
λ q, or.rec (IH₁.2 _) (IH₂.2 _)⟩ },
case TM1.stmt.goto : l {
refine ⟨_, λ _, false.elim⟩,
refine supports_stmt_read _ (λ a _ s, _),
exact finset.mem_bind.2 ⟨_, hs _ _, finset.mem_insert_self _ _⟩ },
case TM1.stmt.halt {
refine ⟨_, λ _, false.elim⟩,
simp only [supports_stmt, supports_stmt_move, tr_normal] }
end⟩
end
end TM1to1
/-!
## TM0 emulator in TM1
To establish that TM0 and TM1 are equivalent computational models, we must also have a TM0 emulator
in TM1. The main complication here is that TM0 allows an action to depend on the value at the head
and local state, while TM1 doesn't (in order to have more programming language-like semantics).
So we use a computed `goto` to go to a state that performes the desired action and then returns to
normal execution.
One issue with this is that the `halt` instruction is supposed to halt immediately, not take a step
to a halting state. To resolve this we do a check for `halt` first, then `goto` (with an
unreachable branch).
-/
namespace TM0to1
section
parameters {Γ : Type*} [inhabited Γ]
parameters {Λ : Type*} [inhabited Λ]
/-- The machine states for a TM1 emulating a TM0 machine. States of the TM0 machine are embedded
as `normal q` states, but the actual operation is split into two parts, a jump to `act s q`
followed by the action and a jump to the next `normal` state. -/
inductive Λ'
| normal : Λ → Λ'
| act : TM0.stmt Γ → Λ → Λ'
instance : inhabited Λ' := ⟨Λ'.normal (default _)⟩
local notation `cfg₀` := TM0.cfg Γ Λ
local notation `stmt₁` := TM1.stmt Γ Λ' unit
local notation `cfg₁` := TM1.cfg Γ Λ' unit
parameters (M : TM0.machine Γ Λ)
open TM1.stmt
/-- The program. -/
def tr : Λ' → stmt₁
| (Λ'.normal q) :=
branch (λ a _, (M q a).is_none) halt $
goto (λ a _, match M q a with
| none := default _ -- unreachable
| some (q', s) := Λ'.act s q'
end)
| (Λ'.act (TM0.stmt.move d) q) := move d $ goto (λ _ _, Λ'.normal q)
| (Λ'.act (TM0.stmt.write a) q) := write (λ _ _, a) $ goto (λ _ _, Λ'.normal q)
/-- The configuration translation. -/
def tr_cfg : cfg₀ → cfg₁
| ⟨q, T⟩ := ⟨cond (M q T.1).is_some (some (Λ'.normal q)) none, (), T⟩
theorem tr_respects : respects (TM0.step M) (TM1.step tr)
(λ a b, tr_cfg a = b) :=
fun_respects.2 $ λ ⟨q, T⟩, begin
cases e : M q T.1,
{ simp only [TM0.step, tr_cfg, e]; exact eq.refl none },
cases val with q' s,
simp only [frespects, TM0.step, tr_cfg, e, option.is_some, cond, option.map_some'],
have : TM1.step (tr M) ⟨some (Λ'.act s q'), (), T⟩ =
some ⟨some (Λ'.normal q'), (), TM0.step._match_1 T s⟩,
{ cases s with d a; refl },
refine trans_gen.head _ (trans_gen.head' this _),
{ unfold TM1.step TM1.step_aux tr has_mem.mem,
rw e, refl },
cases e' : M q' _,
{ apply refl_trans_gen.single,
unfold TM1.step TM1.step_aux tr has_mem.mem,
rw e', refl },
{ refl }
end
end
end TM0to1
/-!
## The TM2 model
The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model, replacing it with an arbitrary (finite)
collection of stacks, each with elements of different types (the alphabet of stack `k : K` is
`Γ k`). The statements are:
* `push k (f : σ → Γ k) q` puts `f a` on the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `pop k (f : σ → option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, and removes this element from the stack, then does `q`.
* `peek k (f : σ → option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `load (f : σ → σ) q` reads nothing but applies `f` to the internal state, then does `q`.
* `branch (f : σ → bool) qtrue qfalse` does `qtrue` or `qfalse` according to `f a`.
* `goto (f : σ → Λ)` jumps to label `f a`.
* `halt` halts on the next step.
The configuration is a tuple `(l, var, stk)` where `l : option Λ` is the current label to run or
`none` for the halting state, `var : σ` is the (finite) internal state, and `stk : ∀ k, list (Γ k)`
is the collection of stacks. (Note that unlike the `TM0` and `TM1` models, these are not
`list_blank`s, they have definite ends that can be detected by the `pop` command.)
Given a designated stack `k` and a value `L : list (Γ k)`, the initial configuration has all the
stacks empty except the designated "input" stack; in `eval` this designated stack also functions
as the output stack.
-/
namespace TM2
section
parameters {K : Type*} [decidable_eq K] -- Index type of stacks
parameters (Γ : K → Type*) -- Type of stack elements
parameters (Λ : Type*) -- Type of function labels
parameters (σ : Type*) -- Type of variable settings
/-- The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model,
replacing it with an arbitrary (finite) collection of stacks.
The operation `push` puts an element on one of the stacks,
and `pop` removes an element from a stack (and modifying the
internal state based on the result). `peek` modifies the
internal state but does not remove an element. -/
inductive stmt
| push : ∀ k, (σ → Γ k) → stmt → stmt
| peek : ∀ k, (σ → option (Γ k) → σ) → stmt → stmt
| pop : ∀ k, (σ → option (Γ k) → σ) → stmt → stmt
| load : (σ → σ) → stmt → stmt
| branch : (σ → bool) → stmt → stmt → stmt
| goto : (σ → Λ) → stmt
| halt : stmt
open stmt
instance stmt.inhabited : inhabited stmt := ⟨halt⟩
/-- A configuration in the TM2 model is a label (or `none` for the halt state), the state of
local variables, and the stacks. (Note that the stacks are not `list_blank`s, they have a definite
size.) -/
structure cfg :=
(l : option Λ)
(var : σ)
(stk : ∀ k, list (Γ k))
instance cfg.inhabited [inhabited σ] : inhabited cfg := ⟨⟨default _, default _, default _⟩⟩
parameters {Γ Λ σ K}
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def step_aux : stmt → σ → (∀ k, list (Γ k)) → cfg
| (push k f q) v S := step_aux q v (update S k (f v :: S k))
| (peek k f q) v S := step_aux q (f v (S k).head') S
| (pop k f q) v S := step_aux q (f v (S k).head') (update S k (S k).tail)
| (load a q) v S := step_aux q (a v) S
| (branch f q₁ q₂) v S :=
cond (f v) (step_aux q₁ v S) (step_aux q₂ v S)
| (goto f) v S := ⟨some (f v), v, S⟩
| halt v S := ⟨none, v, S⟩
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def step (M : Λ → stmt) : cfg → option cfg
| ⟨none, v, S⟩ := none
| ⟨some l, v, S⟩ := some (step_aux (M l) v S)
/-- The (reflexive) reachability relation for the TM2 model. -/
def reaches (M : Λ → stmt) : cfg → cfg → Prop :=
refl_trans_gen (λ a b, b ∈ step M a)
/-- Given a set `S` of states, `support_stmt S q` means that `q` only jumps to states in `S`. -/
def supports_stmt (S : finset Λ) : stmt → Prop
| (push k f q) := supports_stmt q
| (peek k f q) := supports_stmt q
| (pop k f q) := supports_stmt q
| (load a q) := supports_stmt q
| (branch f q₁ q₂) := supports_stmt q₁ ∧ supports_stmt q₂
| (goto l) := ∀ v, l v ∈ S
| halt := true
open_locale classical
/-- The set of subtree statements in a statement. -/
noncomputable def stmts₁ : stmt → finset stmt
| Q@(push k f q) := insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(peek k f q) := insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(pop k f q) := insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(load a q) := insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(branch f q₁ q₂) := insert Q (stmts₁ q₁ ∪ stmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(goto l) := {Q}
| Q@halt := {Q}
theorem stmts₁_self {q} : q ∈ stmts₁ q :=
by cases q; apply_rules [finset.mem_insert_self, finset.mem_singleton_self]
theorem stmts₁_trans {q₁ q₂} :
q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂ → stmts₁ q₁ ⊆ stmts₁ q₂ :=
begin
intros h₁₂ q₀ h₀₁,
induction q₂ with _ _ q IH _ _ q IH _ _ q IH _ q IH;
simp only [stmts₁] at h₁₂ ⊢;
simp only [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton, finset.mem_union] at h₁₂,
iterate 4 {
rcases h₁₂ with rfl | h₁₂,
{ unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁, exact h₀₁ },
{ exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem (IH h₁₂) } },
case TM2.stmt.branch : f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ {
rcases h₁₂ with rfl | h₁₂ | h₁₂,
{ unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁, exact h₀₁ },
{ exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_union_left _ (IH₁ h₁₂)) },
{ exact finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_union_right _ (IH₂ h₁₂)) } },
case TM2.stmt.goto : l {
subst h₁₂, exact h₀₁ },
case TM2.stmt.halt {
subst h₁₂, exact h₀₁ }
end
theorem stmts₁_supports_stmt_mono {S q₁ q₂}
(h : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂) (hs : supports_stmt S q₂) : supports_stmt S q₁ :=
begin
induction q₂ with _ _ q IH _ _ q IH _ _ q IH _ q IH;
simp only [stmts₁, supports_stmt, finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_union,
finset.mem_singleton] at h hs,
iterate 4 { rcases h with rfl | h; [exact hs, exact IH h hs] },
case TM2.stmt.branch : f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ {
rcases h with rfl | h | h, exacts [hs, IH₁ h hs.1, IH₂ h hs.2] },
case TM2.stmt.goto : l { subst h, exact hs },
case TM2.stmt.halt { subst h, trivial }
end
/-- The set of statements accessible from initial set `S` of labels. -/
noncomputable def stmts (M : Λ → stmt) (S : finset Λ) : finset (option stmt) :=
(S.bind (λ q, stmts₁ (M q))).insert_none
theorem stmts_trans {M : Λ → stmt} {S q₁ q₂}
(h₁ : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂) : some q₂ ∈ stmts M S → some q₁ ∈ stmts M S :=
by simp only [stmts, finset.mem_insert_none, finset.mem_bind,
option.mem_def, forall_eq', exists_imp_distrib];
exact λ l ls h₂, ⟨_, ls, stmts₁_trans h₂ h₁⟩
variable [inhabited Λ]
/-- Given a TM2 machine `M` and a set `S` of states, `supports M S` means that all states in
`S` jump only to other states in `S`. -/
def supports (M : Λ → stmt) (S : finset Λ) :=
default Λ ∈ S ∧ ∀ q ∈ S, supports_stmt S (M q)
theorem stmts_supports_stmt {M : Λ → stmt} {S q}
(ss : supports M S) : some q ∈ stmts M S → supports_stmt S q :=
by simp only [stmts, finset.mem_insert_none, finset.mem_bind,
option.mem_def, forall_eq', exists_imp_distrib];
exact λ l ls h, stmts₁_supports_stmt_mono h (ss.2 _ ls)
theorem step_supports (M : Λ → stmt) {S}
(ss : supports M S) : ∀ {c c' : cfg},
c' ∈ step M c → c.l ∈ S.insert_none → c'.l ∈ S.insert_none
| ⟨some l₁, v, T⟩ c' h₁ h₂ := begin
replace h₂ := ss.2 _ (finset.some_mem_insert_none.1 h₂),
simp only [step, option.mem_def] at h₁, subst c',
revert h₂, induction M l₁ with _ _ q IH _ _ q IH _ _ q IH _ q IH generalizing v T;
intro hs,
iterate 4 { exact IH _ _ hs },
case TM2.stmt.branch : p q₁' q₂' IH₁ IH₂ {
unfold step_aux, cases p v,
{ exact IH₂ _ _ hs.2 },
{ exact IH₁ _ _ hs.1 } },
case TM2.stmt.goto { exact finset.some_mem_insert_none.2 (hs _) },
case TM2.stmt.halt { apply multiset.mem_cons_self }
end
variable [inhabited σ]
/-- The initial state of the TM2 model. The input is provided on a designated stack. -/
def init (k) (L : list (Γ k)) : cfg :=
⟨some (default _), default _, update (λ _, []) k L⟩
/-- Evaluates a TM2 program to completion, with the output on the same stack as the input. -/
def eval (M : Λ → stmt) (k) (L : list (Γ k)) : roption (list (Γ k)) :=
(eval (step M) (init k L)).map $ λ c, c.stk k
end
end TM2
/-!
## TM2 emulator in TM1
To prove that TM2 computable functions are TM1 computable, we need to reduce each TM2 program to a
TM1 program. So suppose a TM2 program is given. This program has to maintain a whole collection of
stacks, but we have only one tape, so we must "multiplex" them all together. Pictorially, if stack
1 contains `[a, b]` and stack 2 contains `[c, d, e, f]` then the tape looks like this:
```
bottom: ... | _ | T | _ | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 1: ... | _ | b | a | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 2: ... | _ | f | e | d | c | _ | ...
```
where a tape element is a vertical slice through the diagram. Here the alphabet is
`Γ' := bool × ∀ k, option (Γ k)`, where:
* `bottom : bool` is marked only in one place, the initial position of the TM, and represents the
tail of all stacks. It is never modified.
* `stk k : option (Γ k)` is the value of the `k`-th stack, if in range, otherwise `none` (which is
the blank value). Note that the head of the stack is at the far end; this is so that push and pop
don't have to do any shifting.
In "resting" position, the TM is sitting at the position marked `bottom`. For non-stack actions,
it operates in place, but for the stack actions `push`, `peek`, and `pop`, it must shuttle to the
end of the appropriate stack, make its changes, and then return to the bottom. So the states are:
* `normal (l : Λ)`: waiting at `bottom` to execute function `l`
* `go k (s : st_act k) (q : stmt₂)`: travelling to the right to get to the end of stack `k` in
order to perform stack action `s`, and later continue with executing `q`
* `ret (q : stmt₂)`: travelling to the left after having performed a stack action, and executing
`q` once we arrive
Because of the shuttling, emulation overhead is `O(n)`, where `n` is the current maximum of the
length of all stacks. Therefore a program that takes `k` steps to run in TM2 takes `O((m+k)k)`
steps to run when emulated in TM1, where `m` is the length of the input.
-/
namespace TM2to1
-- A displaced lemma proved in unnecessary generality
theorem stk_nth_val {K : Type*} {Γ : K → Type*} {L : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))} {k S} (n)
(hL : list_blank.map (proj k) L = list_blank.mk (list.map some S).reverse) :
L.nth n k = S.reverse.nth n :=
begin
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ← list.map_reverse, list_blank.nth_mk, list.inth, list.nth_map],
cases S.reverse.nth n; refl
end
section
parameters {K : Type*} [decidable_eq K]
parameters {Γ : K → Type*}
parameters {Λ : Type*} [inhabited Λ]
parameters {σ : Type*} [inhabited σ]
local notation `stmt₂` := TM2.stmt Γ Λ σ
local notation `cfg₂` := TM2.cfg Γ Λ σ
/-- The alphabet of the TM2 simulator on TM1 is a marker for the stack bottom,
plus a vector of stack elements for each stack, or none if the stack does not extend this far. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments] -- [decidable_eq K]: Because K is a parameter, we cannot easily skip
-- the decidable_eq assumption, and this is a local definition anyway so it's not important.
def Γ' := bool × ∀ k, option (Γ k)
instance Γ'.inhabited : inhabited Γ' := ⟨⟨ff, λ _, none⟩⟩
instance Γ'.fintype [fintype K] [∀ k, fintype (Γ k)] : fintype Γ' :=
prod.fintype _ _
/-- The bottom marker is fixed throughout the calculation, so we use the `add_bottom` function
to express the program state in terms of a tape with only the stacks themselves. -/
def add_bottom (L : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))) : list_blank Γ' :=
list_blank.cons (tt, L.head) (L.tail.map ⟨prod.mk ff, rfl⟩)
theorem add_bottom_map (L) : (add_bottom L).map ⟨prod.snd, rfl⟩ = L :=
begin
simp only [add_bottom, list_blank.map_cons]; convert list_blank.cons_head_tail _,
generalize : list_blank.tail L = L',
refine L'.induction_on _, intro l, simp,
rw (_ : _ ∘ _ = id), {simp},
funext a, refl
end
theorem add_bottom_modify_nth (f : (∀ k, option (Γ k)) → (∀ k, option (Γ k))) (L n) :
(add_bottom L).modify_nth (λ a, (a.1, f a.2)) n = add_bottom (L.modify_nth f n) :=
begin
cases n; simp only [add_bottom,
list_blank.head_cons, list_blank.modify_nth, list_blank.tail_cons],
congr, symmetry, apply list_blank.map_modify_nth, intro, refl
end
theorem add_bottom_nth_snd (L n) : ((add_bottom L).nth n).2 = L.nth n :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← add_bottom_map L, list_blank.nth_map]}; refl
theorem add_bottom_nth_succ_fst (L n) : ((add_bottom L).nth (n+1)).1 = ff :=
by rw [list_blank.nth_succ, add_bottom, list_blank.tail_cons, list_blank.nth_map]; refl
theorem add_bottom_head_fst (L) : (add_bottom L).head.1 = tt :=
by rw [add_bottom, list_blank.head_cons]; refl
/-- A stack action is a command that interacts with the top of a stack. Our default position
is at the bottom of all the stacks, so we have to hold on to this action while going to the end
to modify the stack. -/
inductive st_act (k : K)
| push : (σ → Γ k) → st_act
| peek : (σ → option (Γ k) → σ) → st_act
| pop : (σ → option (Γ k) → σ) → st_act
instance st_act.inhabited {k} : inhabited (st_act k) := ⟨st_act.peek (λ s _, s)⟩
section
open st_act
/-- The TM2 statement corresponding to a stack action. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments] -- [inhabited Λ]: as this is a local definition it is more trouble than
-- it is worth to omit the typeclass assumption without breaking the parameters
def st_run {k : K} : st_act k → stmt₂ → stmt₂
| (push f) := TM2.stmt.push k f
| (peek f) := TM2.stmt.peek k f
| (pop f) := TM2.stmt.pop k f
/-- The effect of a stack action on the local variables, given the value of the stack. -/
def st_var {k : K} (v : σ) (l : list (Γ k)) : st_act k → σ
| (push f) := v
| (peek f) := f v l.head'
| (pop f) := f v l.head'
/-- The effect of a stack action on the stack. -/
def st_write {k : K} (v : σ) (l : list (Γ k)) : st_act k → list (Γ k)
| (push f) := f v :: l
| (peek f) := l
| (pop f) := l.tail
/-- We have partitioned the TM2 statements into "stack actions", which require going to the end
of the stack, and all other actions, which do not. This is a modified recursor which lumps the
stack actions into one. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def {l} stmt_st_rec
{C : stmt₂ → Sort l}
(H₁ : Π k (s : st_act k) q (IH : C q), C (st_run s q))
(H₂ : Π a q (IH : C q), C (TM2.stmt.load a q))
(H₃ : Π p q₁ q₂ (IH₁ : C q₁) (IH₂ : C q₂), C (TM2.stmt.branch p q₁ q₂))
(H₄ : Π l, C (TM2.stmt.goto l))
(H₅ : C TM2.stmt.halt) : ∀ n, C n
| (TM2.stmt.push k f q) := H₁ _ (push f) _ (stmt_st_rec q)
| (TM2.stmt.peek k f q) := H₁ _ (peek f) _ (stmt_st_rec q)
| (TM2.stmt.pop k f q) := H₁ _ (pop f) _ (stmt_st_rec q)
| (TM2.stmt.load a q) := H₂ _ _ (stmt_st_rec q)
| (TM2.stmt.branch a q₁ q₂) := H₃ _ _ _ (stmt_st_rec q₁) (stmt_st_rec q₂)
| (TM2.stmt.goto l) := H₄ _
| TM2.stmt.halt := H₅
theorem supports_run (S : finset Λ) {k} (s : st_act k) (q) :
TM2.supports_stmt S (st_run s q) ↔ TM2.supports_stmt S q :=
by rcases s with _|_|_; refl
end
/-- The machine states of the TM2 emulator. We can either be in a normal state when waiting for the
next TM2 action, or we can be in the "go" and "return" states to go to the top of the stack and
return to the bottom, respectively. -/
inductive Λ' : Type (max u_1 u_2 u_3 u_4)
| normal : Λ → Λ'
| go (k) : st_act k → stmt₂ → Λ'
| ret : stmt₂ → Λ'
open Λ'
instance Λ'.inhabited : inhabited Λ' := ⟨normal (default _)⟩
local notation `stmt₁` := TM1.stmt Γ' Λ' σ
local notation `cfg₁` := TM1.cfg Γ' Λ' σ
open TM1.stmt
/-- The program corresponding to state transitions at the end of a stack. Here we start out just
after the top of the stack, and should end just after the new top of the stack. -/
def tr_st_act {k} (q : stmt₁) : st_act k → stmt₁
| (st_act.push f) := write (λ a s, (a.1, update a.2 k $ some $ f s)) $ move dir.right q
| (st_act.peek f) := move dir.left $ load (λ a s, f s (a.2 k)) $ move dir.right q
| (st_act.pop f) :=
branch (λ a _, a.1)
( load (λ a s, f s none) q )
( move dir.left $
load (λ a s, f s (a.2 k)) $
write (λ a s, (a.1, update a.2 k none)) q )
/-- The initial state for the TM2 emulator, given an initial TM2 state. All stacks start out empty
except for the input stack, and the stack bottom mark is set at the head. -/
def tr_init (k) (L : list (Γ k)) : list Γ' :=
let L' : list Γ' := L.reverse.map (λ a, (ff, update (λ _, none) k a)) in
(tt, L'.head.2) :: L'.tail
theorem step_run {k : K} (q v S) : ∀ s : st_act k,
TM2.step_aux (st_run s q) v S =
TM2.step_aux q (st_var v (S k) s) (update S k (st_write v (S k) s))
| (st_act.push f) := rfl
| (st_act.peek f) := by unfold st_write; rw function.update_eq_self; refl
| (st_act.pop f) := rfl
/-- The translation of TM2 statements to TM1 statements. regular actions have direct equivalents,
but stack actions are deferred by going to the corresponding `go` state, so that we can find the
appropriate stack top. -/
def tr_normal : stmt₂ → stmt₁
| (TM2.stmt.push k f q) := goto (λ _ _, go k (st_act.push f) q)
| (TM2.stmt.peek k f q) := goto (λ _ _, go k (st_act.peek f) q)
| (TM2.stmt.pop k f q) := goto (λ _ _, go k (st_act.pop f) q)
| (TM2.stmt.load a q) := load (λ _, a) (tr_normal q)
| (TM2.stmt.branch f q₁ q₂) := branch (λ a, f) (tr_normal q₁) (tr_normal q₂)
| (TM2.stmt.goto l) := goto (λ a s, normal (l s))
| TM2.stmt.halt := halt
theorem tr_normal_run {k} (s q) : tr_normal (st_run s q) = goto (λ _ _, go k s q) :=
by rcases s with _|_|_; refl
open_locale classical
/-- The set of machine states accessible from an initial TM2 statement. -/
noncomputable def tr_stmts₁ : stmt₂ → finset Λ'
| Q@(TM2.stmt.push k f q) := {go k (st_act.push f) q, ret q} ∪ tr_stmts₁ q
| Q@(TM2.stmt.peek k f q) := {go k (st_act.peek f) q, ret q} ∪ tr_stmts₁ q
| Q@(TM2.stmt.pop k f q) := {go k (st_act.pop f) q, ret q} ∪ tr_stmts₁ q
| Q@(TM2.stmt.load a q) := tr_stmts₁ q
| Q@(TM2.stmt.branch f q₁ q₂) := tr_stmts₁ q₁ ∪ tr_stmts₁ q₂
| _ := ∅
theorem tr_stmts₁_run {k s q} : tr_stmts₁ (st_run s q) = {go k s q, ret q} ∪ tr_stmts₁ q :=
by rcases s with _|_|_; unfold tr_stmts₁ st_run
theorem tr_respects_aux₂
{k q v} {S : Π k, list (Γ k)} {L : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))}
(hL : ∀ k, L.map (proj k) = list_blank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) (o) :
let v' := st_var v (S k) o,
Sk' := st_write v (S k) o,
S' := update S k Sk' in
∃ (L' : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))),
(∀ k, L'.map (proj k) = list_blank.mk ((S' k).map some).reverse) ∧
TM1.step_aux (tr_st_act q o) v
((tape.move dir.right)^[(S k).length] (tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom L))) =
TM1.step_aux q v'
((tape.move dir.right)^[(S' k).length] (tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom L'))) :=
begin
dsimp only, simp, cases o;
simp only [st_write, st_var, tr_st_act, TM1.step_aux],
case TM2to1.st_act.push : f {
have := tape.write_move_right_n (λ a : Γ', (a.1, update a.2 k (some (f v)))),
dsimp only at this,
refine ⟨_, λ k', _, by rw [
tape.move_right_n_head, list.length, tape.mk'_nth_nat, this,
add_bottom_modify_nth (λ a, update a k (some (f v))),
nat.add_one, nat.iterate_succ']⟩,
refine list_blank.ext (λ i, _),
rw [list_blank.nth_map, list_blank.nth_modify_nth, proj, pointed_map.mk_val],
by_cases h' : k' = k,
{ subst k', split_ifs; simp only [list.reverse_cons,
function.update_same, list_blank.nth_mk, list.inth, list.map],
{ rw [list.nth_le_nth, list.nth_le_append_right];
simp only [h, list.nth_le_singleton, list.length_map, list.length_reverse, nat.succ_pos',
list.length_append, lt_add_iff_pos_right, list.length] },
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, list_blank.nth_mk, list.inth],
cases decidable.lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h h,
{ rw list.nth_append, simpa only [list.length_map, list.length_reverse] using h },
{ rw [list.nth_len_le, list.nth_len_le];
simp only [nat.add_one_le_iff, h, list.length, le_of_lt,
list.length_reverse, list.length_append, list.length_map] } },
{ split_ifs; rw [function.update_noteq h', ← proj_map_nth, hL],
rw function.update_noteq h' } },
case TM2to1.st_act.peek : f {
rw function.update_eq_self,
use [L, hL], rw [tape.move_left_right], congr,
cases e : S k, {refl},
rw [list.length_cons, nat.iterate_succ', tape.move_right_left, tape.move_right_n_head,
tape.mk'_nth_nat, add_bottom_nth_snd, stk_nth_val _ (hL k), e,
list.reverse_cons, ← list.length_reverse, list.nth_concat_length], refl },
case TM2to1.st_act.pop : f {
cases e : S k,
{ simp only [tape.mk'_head, list_blank.head_cons, tape.move_left_mk',
list.length, tape.write_mk', list.head', nat.iterate_zero_apply, list.tail_nil],
rw [← e, function.update_eq_self], exact ⟨L, hL, by rw [add_bottom_head_fst, cond]⟩ },
{ refine ⟨_, λ k', _, by rw [
list.length_cons, tape.move_right_n_head, tape.mk'_nth_nat, add_bottom_nth_succ_fst,
cond, nat.iterate_succ', tape.move_right_left, tape.move_right_n_head, tape.mk'_nth_nat,
tape.write_move_right_n (λ a:Γ', (a.1, update a.2 k none)),
add_bottom_modify_nth (λ a, update a k none),
add_bottom_nth_snd, stk_nth_val _ (hL k), e,
show (list.cons hd tl).reverse.nth tl.length = some hd,
by rw [list.reverse_cons, ← list.length_reverse, list.nth_concat_length]; refl,
list.head', list.tail]⟩,
refine list_blank.ext (λ i, _),
rw [list_blank.nth_map, list_blank.nth_modify_nth, proj, pointed_map.mk_val],
by_cases h' : k' = k,
{ subst k', split_ifs; simp only [
function.update_same, list_blank.nth_mk, list.tail, list.inth],
{ rw [list.nth_len_le], {refl}, rw [h, list.length_reverse, list.length_map] },
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, list_blank.nth_mk, list.inth, e, list.map, list.reverse_cons],
cases decidable.lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h h,
{ rw list.nth_append, simpa only [list.length_map, list.length_reverse] using h },
{ rw [list.nth_len_le, list.nth_len_le];
simp only [nat.add_one_le_iff, h, list.length, le_of_lt,
list.length_reverse, list.length_append, list.length_map] } },
{ split_ifs; rw [function.update_noteq h', ← proj_map_nth, hL],
rw function.update_noteq h' } } },
end
parameters (M : Λ → stmt₂)
include M
/-- The TM2 emulator machine states written as a TM1 program.
This handles the `go` and `ret` states, which shuttle to and from a stack top. -/
def tr : Λ' → stmt₁
| (normal q) := tr_normal (M q)
| (go k s q) :=
branch (λ a s, (a.2 k).is_none) (tr_st_act (goto (λ _ _, ret q)) s)
(move dir.right $ goto (λ _ _, go k s q))
| (ret q) :=
branch (λ a s, a.1) (tr_normal q)
(move dir.left $ goto (λ _ _, ret q))
local attribute [pp_using_anonymous_constructor] turing.TM1.cfg
/-- The relation between TM2 configurations and TM1 configurations of the TM2 emulator. -/
inductive tr_cfg : cfg₂ → cfg₁ → Prop
| mk {q v} {S : ∀ k, list (Γ k)} (L : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))) :
(∀ k, L.map (proj k) = list_blank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) →
tr_cfg ⟨q, v, S⟩ ⟨q.map normal, v, tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom L)⟩
theorem tr_respects_aux₁ {k} (o q v) {S : list (Γ k)} {L : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))}
(hL : L.map (proj k) = list_blank.mk (S.map some).reverse) (n ≤ S.length) :
reaches₀ (TM1.step tr)
⟨some (go k o q), v, (tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom L))⟩
⟨some (go k o q), v, (tape.move dir.right)^[n] (tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom L))⟩ :=
begin
induction n with n IH, {refl},
apply (IH (le_of_lt H)).tail,
rw nat.iterate_succ', simp only [TM1.step, TM1.step_aux, tr,
tape.mk'_nth_nat, tape.move_right_n_head, add_bottom_nth_snd,
option.mem_def],
rw [stk_nth_val _ hL, list.nth_le_nth], refl, rwa list.length_reverse
end
theorem tr_respects_aux₃ {q v} {L : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))} (n) :
reaches₀ (TM1.step tr)
⟨some (ret q), v, (tape.move dir.right)^[n] (tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom L))⟩
⟨some (ret q), v, (tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom L))⟩ :=
begin
induction n with n IH, {refl},
refine reaches₀.head _ IH,
rw [option.mem_def, TM1.step, tr, TM1.step_aux, tape.move_right_n_head, tape.mk'_nth_nat,
add_bottom_nth_succ_fst, TM1.step_aux, nat.iterate_succ', tape.move_right_left], refl,
end
theorem tr_respects_aux {q v T k} {S : Π k, list (Γ k)}
(hT : ∀ k, list_blank.map (proj k) T = list_blank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse)
(o : st_act k)
(IH : ∀ {v : σ} {S : Π (k : K), list (Γ k)} {T : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))},
(∀ k, list_blank.map (proj k) T = list_blank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) →
(∃ b, tr_cfg (TM2.step_aux q v S) b ∧
reaches (TM1.step tr) (TM1.step_aux (tr_normal q) v (tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom T))) b)) :
∃ b, tr_cfg (TM2.step_aux (st_run o q) v S) b ∧
reaches (TM1.step tr) (TM1.step_aux (tr_normal (st_run o q))
v (tape.mk' ∅ (add_bottom T))) b :=
begin
simp only [tr_normal_run, step_run],
have hgo := tr_respects_aux₁ M o q v (hT k) _ (le_refl _),
obtain ⟨T', hT', hrun⟩ := tr_respects_aux₂ hT o,
have hret := tr_respects_aux₃ M _,
have := hgo.tail' rfl,
rw [tr, TM1.step_aux, tape.move_right_n_head, tape.mk'_nth_nat, add_bottom_nth_snd,
stk_nth_val _ (hT k), list.nth_len_le (le_of_eq (list.length_reverse _)),
option.is_none, cond, hrun, TM1.step_aux] at this,
obtain ⟨c, gc, rc⟩ := IH hT',
refine ⟨c, gc, (this.to₀.trans hret c (trans_gen.head' rfl _)).to_refl⟩,
rw [tr, TM1.step_aux, tape.mk'_head, add_bottom_head_fst],
exact rc,
end
local attribute [simp] respects TM2.step TM2.step_aux tr_normal
theorem tr_respects : respects (TM2.step M) (TM1.step tr) tr_cfg :=
λ c₁ c₂ h, begin
cases h with l v S L hT, clear h,
cases l, {constructor},
simp only [TM2.step, respects, option.map_some'],
suffices : ∃ b, _ ∧ reaches (TM1.step (tr M)) _ _,
from let ⟨b, c, r⟩ := this in ⟨b, c, trans_gen.head' rfl r⟩,
rw [tr],
revert v S L hT, refine stmt_st_rec _ _ _ _ _ (M l); intros,
{ exact tr_respects_aux M hT s @IH },
{ exact IH _ hT },
{ unfold TM2.step_aux tr_normal TM1.step_aux,
cases p v; [exact IH₂ _ hT, exact IH₁ _ hT] },
{ exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hT⟩, refl_trans_gen.refl⟩ },
{ exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hT⟩, refl_trans_gen.refl⟩ }
end
theorem tr_cfg_init (k) (L : list (Γ k)) :
tr_cfg (TM2.init k L) (TM1.init (tr_init k L)) :=
begin
rw (_ : TM1.init _ = _),
{ refine ⟨list_blank.mk (L.reverse.map $ λ a, update (default _) k (some a)), λ k', _⟩,
refine list_blank.ext (λ i, _),
rw [list_blank.map_mk, list_blank.nth_mk, list.inth, list.map_map, (∘),
list.nth_map, proj, pointed_map.mk_val],
by_cases k' = k,
{ subst k', simp only [function.update_same],
rw [list_blank.nth_mk, list.inth, ← list.map_reverse, list.nth_map] },
{ simp only [function.update_noteq h],
rw [list_blank.nth_mk, list.inth, list.map, list.reverse_nil, list.nth],
cases L.reverse.nth i; refl } },
{ rw [tr_init, TM1.init], dsimp only, congr; cases L.reverse; try {refl},
simp only [list.map_map, list.tail_cons, list.map], refl }
end
theorem tr_eval_dom (k) (L : list (Γ k)) :
(TM1.eval tr (tr_init k L)).dom ↔ (TM2.eval M k L).dom :=
tr_eval_dom tr_respects (tr_cfg_init _ _)
theorem tr_eval (k) (L : list (Γ k)) {L₁ L₂}
(H₁ : L₁ ∈ TM1.eval tr (tr_init k L))
(H₂ : L₂ ∈ TM2.eval M k L) :
∃ (S : ∀ k, list (Γ k)) (L' : list_blank (∀ k, option (Γ k))),
add_bottom L' = L₁ ∧
(∀ k, L'.map (proj k) = list_blank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) ∧
S k = L₂ :=
begin
obtain ⟨c₁, h₁, rfl⟩ := (roption.mem_map_iff _).1 H₁,
obtain ⟨c₂, h₂, rfl⟩ := (roption.mem_map_iff _).1 H₂,
obtain ⟨_, ⟨q, v, S, L', hT⟩, h₃⟩ := tr_eval (tr_respects M) (tr_cfg_init M k L) h₂,
cases roption.mem_unique h₁ h₃,
exact ⟨S, L', by simp only [tape.mk'_right₀], hT, rfl⟩
end
/-- The support of a set of TM2 states in the TM2 emulator. -/
noncomputable def tr_supp (S : finset Λ) : finset Λ' :=
S.bind (λ l, insert (normal l) (tr_stmts₁ (M l)))
theorem tr_supports {S} (ss : TM2.supports M S) :
TM1.supports tr (tr_supp S) :=
⟨finset.mem_bind.2 ⟨_, ss.1, finset.mem_insert.2 $ or.inl rfl⟩,
λ l' h, begin
suffices : ∀ q (ss' : TM2.supports_stmt S q)
(sub : ∀ x ∈ tr_stmts₁ q, x ∈ tr_supp M S),
TM1.supports_stmt (tr_supp M S) (tr_normal q) ∧
(∀ l' ∈ tr_stmts₁ q, TM1.supports_stmt (tr_supp M S) (tr M l')),
{ rcases finset.mem_bind.1 h with ⟨l, lS, h⟩,
have := this _ (ss.2 l lS) (λ x hx,
finset.mem_bind.2 ⟨_, lS, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hx⟩),
rcases finset.mem_insert.1 h with rfl | h;
[exact this.1, exact this.2 _ h] },
clear h l', refine stmt_st_rec _ _ _ _ _; intros,
{ -- stack op
rw TM2to1.supports_run at ss',
simp only [TM2to1.tr_stmts₁_run, finset.mem_union,
finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton] at sub,
have hgo := sub _ (or.inl $ or.inl rfl),
have hret := sub _ (or.inl $ or.inr rfl),
cases IH ss' (λ x hx, sub x $ or.inr hx) with IH₁ IH₂,
refine ⟨by simp only [tr_normal_run, TM1.supports_stmt]; intros; exact hgo, λ l h, _⟩,
rw [tr_stmts₁_run] at h,
simp only [TM2to1.tr_stmts₁_run, finset.mem_union,
finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton] at h,
rcases h with ⟨rfl | rfl⟩ | h,
{ unfold TM1.supports_stmt TM2to1.tr,
rcases s with _|_|_,
{ exact ⟨λ _ _, hret, λ _ _, hgo⟩ },
{ exact ⟨λ _ _, hret, λ _ _, hgo⟩ },
{ exact ⟨⟨λ _ _, hret, λ _ _, hret⟩, λ _ _, hgo⟩ } },
{ unfold TM1.supports_stmt TM2to1.tr,
exact ⟨IH₁, λ _ _, hret⟩ },
{ exact IH₂ _ h } },
{ -- load
unfold TM2to1.tr_stmts₁ at ss' sub ⊢,
exact IH ss' sub },
{ -- branch
unfold TM2to1.tr_stmts₁ at sub,
cases IH₁ ss'.1 (λ x hx, sub x $ finset.mem_union_left _ hx) with IH₁₁ IH₁₂,
cases IH₂ ss'.2 (λ x hx, sub x $ finset.mem_union_right _ hx) with IH₂₁ IH₂₂,
refine ⟨⟨IH₁₁, IH₂₁⟩, λ l h, _⟩,
rw [tr_stmts₁] at h,
rcases finset.mem_union.1 h with h | h;
[exact IH₁₂ _ h, exact IH₂₂ _ h] },
{ -- goto
rw tr_stmts₁, unfold TM2to1.tr_normal TM1.supports_stmt,
unfold TM2.supports_stmt at ss',
exact ⟨λ _ v, finset.mem_bind.2 ⟨_, ss' v, finset.mem_insert_self _ _⟩, λ _, false.elim⟩ },
{ exact ⟨trivial, λ _, false.elim⟩ } -- halt
end⟩
end
end TM2to1
end turing
|
c00e13caa9cd0aaeb81c448db94d9fbb7b1cbb76 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /src/Lean/Parser/Module.lean | 031e14f58ae9d3c40629316f5901985d84b185fa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,726 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Message
import Lean.Parser.Command
namespace Lean
namespace Parser
namespace Module
def «prelude» := parser! "prelude"
def «import» := parser! "import " >> optional "runtime" >> ident
def header := parser! optional («prelude» >> ppLine) >> many («import» >> ppLine) >> ppLine
/--
Parser for a Lean module. We never actually run this parser but instead use the imperative definitions below that
return the same syntax tree structure, but add error recovery. Still, it is helpful to have a `Parser` definition
for it in order to auto-generate helpers such as the pretty printer. -/
@[runBuiltinParserAttributeHooks]
def module := parser! header >> many (commandParser >> ppLine >> ppLine)
def updateTokens (c : ParserContext) : ParserContext :=
{ c with
tokens := match addParserTokens c.tokens header.info with
| Except.ok tables => tables
| Except.error _ => unreachable! }
end Module
structure ModuleParserState where
pos : String.Pos := 0
recovering : Bool := false
deriving Inhabited
private def mkErrorMessage (c : ParserContext) (pos : String.Pos) (errorMsg : String) : Message :=
let pos := c.fileMap.toPosition pos
{ fileName := c.fileName, pos := pos, data := errorMsg }
def parseHeader (inputCtx : InputContext) : IO (Syntax × ModuleParserState × MessageLog) := do
let dummyEnv ← mkEmptyEnvironment
let ctx := mkParserContext inputCtx { env := dummyEnv, options := {} }
let ctx := Module.updateTokens ctx
let s := mkParserState ctx.input
let s := whitespace ctx s
let s := Module.header.fn ctx s
let stx := s.stxStack.back
match s.errorMsg with
| some errorMsg =>
let msg := mkErrorMessage ctx s.pos (toString errorMsg)
pure (stx, { pos := s.pos, recovering := true }, { : MessageLog }.add msg)
| none =>
pure (stx, { pos := s.pos }, {})
private def mkEOI (pos : String.Pos) : Syntax :=
let atom := mkAtom (SourceInfo.original "".toSubstring pos "".toSubstring) ""
Syntax.node `Lean.Parser.Module.eoi #[atom]
def isEOI (s : Syntax) : Bool :=
s.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Module.eoi
def isExitCommand (s : Syntax) : Bool :=
s.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Command.exit
private def consumeInput (c : ParserContext) (pos : String.Pos) : String.Pos :=
let s : ParserState := { cache := initCacheForInput c.input, pos := pos }
let s := tokenFn c s
match s.errorMsg with
| some _ => pos + 1
| none => s.pos
def topLevelCommandParserFn : ParserFn :=
orelseFnCore
commandParser.fn
(andthenFn (lookaheadFn termParser.fn) (errorFn "expected command, but found term; this error may be due to parsing precedence levels, consider parenthesizing the term"))
false /- do not merge errors -/
partial def parseCommand (inputCtx : InputContext) (pmctx : ParserModuleContext) (s : ModuleParserState) (messages : MessageLog) : Syntax × ModuleParserState × MessageLog :=
let rec parse (s : ModuleParserState) (messages : MessageLog) :=
let { pos := pos, recovering := recovering } := s
if inputCtx.input.atEnd pos then
(mkEOI pos, s, messages)
else
let c := mkParserContext inputCtx pmctx
let s := { cache := initCacheForInput c.input, pos := pos : ParserState }
let s := whitespace c s
let s := topLevelCommandParserFn c s
let stx := s.stxStack.back
match s.errorMsg with
| none => (stx, { pos := s.pos }, messages)
| some errorMsg =>
-- advance at least one token to prevent infinite loops
let pos := if s.pos == pos then consumeInput c s.pos else s.pos
if recovering then
parse { pos := pos, recovering := true } messages
else
let msg := mkErrorMessage c s.pos (toString errorMsg)
let messages := messages.add msg
-- We should replace the following line with commented one if we want to elaborate commands containing Syntax errors.
-- This is useful for implementing features such as autocompletion.
-- Right now, it is disabled since `match_syntax` fails on "partial" `Syntax` objects.
parse { pos := pos, recovering := true } messages
-- (stx, { pos := pos, recovering := true }, messages)
parse s messages
-- only useful for testing since most Lean files cannot be parsed without elaboration
partial def testParseModuleAux (env : Environment) (inputCtx : InputContext) (s : ModuleParserState) (msgs : MessageLog) (stxs : Array Syntax) : IO (Array Syntax) :=
let rec parse (state : ModuleParserState) (msgs : MessageLog) (stxs : Array Syntax) :=
match parseCommand inputCtx { env := env, options := {} } state msgs with
| (stx, state, msgs) =>
if isEOI stx then
if msgs.isEmpty then
pure stxs
else do
msgs.forM fun msg => msg.toString >>= IO.println
throw (IO.userError "failed to parse file")
else
parse state msgs (stxs.push stx)
parse s msgs stxs
def testParseModule (env : Environment) (fname contents : String) : IO Syntax := do
let fname ← IO.realPath fname
let inputCtx := mkInputContext contents fname
let (header, state, messages) ← parseHeader inputCtx
let cmds ← testParseModuleAux env inputCtx state messages #[]
let stx := Syntax.node `Lean.Parser.Module.module #[header, mkListNode cmds]
pure stx.updateLeading
def testParseFile (env : Environment) (fname : String) : IO Syntax := do
let contents ← IO.FS.readFile fname
testParseModule env fname contents
end Parser
end Lean
|
e15cd365957d6fa2581f61c028e4aa46af043407 | e38e95b38a38a99ecfa1255822e78e4b26f65bb0 | /src/certigrad/program.lean | 08e3f797c1c7eadbcf88d1e5bc574986fc5aa9ce | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ColaDrill/certigrad | fefb1be3670adccd3bed2f3faf57507f156fd501 | fe288251f623ac7152e5ce555f1cd9d3a20203c2 | refs/heads/master | 1,593,297,324,250 | 1,499,903,753,000 | 1,499,903,753,000 | 97,075,797 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,499,916,210,000 | 1,499,916,210,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,252 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Daniel Selsam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Daniel Selsam
A term language for conveniently constructing stochastic computation graphs.
-/
import .tensor .graph .tactics .ops data.hash_map
#print "compiling program..."
namespace certigrad
namespace program
open list
inductive unary_op : Type
| neg : unary_op, exp, log, sqrt, softplus, sigmoid
inductive binary_op : Type
| add, sub, mul, div
inductive term : Type
| unary : unary_op → term → term
| binary : binary_op → term → term → term
| sum : term → term
| scale : ℝ → term → term
| gemm : term → term → term
| mvn_iso_kl : term → term → term
| mvn_iso_empirical_kl : term → term → term → term
| bernoulli_neglogpdf : term → term → term
| id : label → term
instance : has_neg term := ⟨term.unary unary_op.neg⟩
instance : has_smul ℝ term := ⟨term.scale⟩
instance : has_add term := ⟨term.binary binary_op.add⟩
instance : has_sub term := ⟨term.binary binary_op.sub⟩
instance : has_mul term := ⟨term.binary binary_op.mul⟩
instance : has_div term := ⟨term.binary binary_op.div⟩
instance coe_id : has_coe label term := ⟨term.id⟩
def exp : term → term := term.unary unary_op.exp
def log : term → term := term.unary unary_op.log
def sqrt : term → term := term.unary unary_op.sqrt
def softplus : term → term := term.unary unary_op.softplus
def sigmoid : term → term := term.unary unary_op.sigmoid
inductive rterm : Type
| mvn_iso : term → term → rterm
| mvn_iso_std : S → rterm
inductive statement : Type
| param : label → S → statement
| input : label → S → statement
| cost : label → statement
| assign : label → term → statement
| sample : label → rterm → statement
structure state : Type :=
(next_id : ℕ) (shapes : hash_map label (λ x, S))
(nodes : list node) (costs : list ID) (targets inputs : list reference)
def empty_state : state := ⟨0, mk_hash_map (λ (x : label), x^.to_nat), [], [], [], []⟩
def unary_to_op (shape : S) : unary_op → det.op [shape] shape
| unary_op.neg := ops.neg shape
| unary_op.exp := ops.exp shape
| unary_op.log := ops.log shape
| unary_op.sqrt := ops.sqrt shape
| unary_op.softplus := ops.softplus shape
| unary_op.sigmoid := ops.sigmoid shape
def binary_to_op (shape : S) : binary_op → det.op [shape, shape] shape
| binary_op.add := ops.add shape
| binary_op.mul := ops.mul shape
| binary_op.sub := ops.sub shape
| binary_op.div := ops.div shape
def get_id (next_id : ℕ) : option ID → ID
| none := ID.nat next_id
| (some ident) := ident
def process_term : term → state → option ID → reference × state
| (term.unary f t) st ident :=
match process_term t st none with
| ((p₁, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
((ID.nat $ next_id, shape),
⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, shape), [(p₁, shape)], operator.det (unary_to_op shape f)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
| (term.binary f t₁ t₂) st ident :=
match process_term t₁ st none with
| ((p₁, shape'), st') :=
match process_term t₂ st' none with
| ((p₂, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
((get_id next_id ident, shape),
⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, shape), [(p₁, shape), (p₂, shape)], operator.det (binary_to_op shape f)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
end
| (term.sum t) st ident :=
match process_term t st none with
| ((p₁, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
((get_id next_id ident, []),
⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, []), [(p₁, shape)], operator.det (ops.sum shape)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
| (term.scale α t) st ident :=
match process_term t st none with
| ((p₁, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
((get_id next_id ident, shape),
⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, shape), [(p₁, shape)], operator.det (ops.scale α shape)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
| (term.gemm t₁ t₂) st ident :=
match process_term t₁ st none with
| ((p₁, shape₁), st') :=
match process_term t₂ st' none with
| ((p₂, shape₂), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
let m := shape₁.head, n := shape₂.head, p := shape₂.tail.head in
((get_id next_id ident, [m, p]),
⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, [m, p]), [(p₁, [m, n]), (p₂, [n, p])], operator.det (ops.gemm _ _ _)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
end
| (term.mvn_iso_kl t₁ t₂) st ident :=
match process_term t₁ st none with
| ((p₁, shape'), st') :=
match process_term t₂ st' none with
| ((p₂, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
((get_id next_id ident, []), ⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, []), [(p₁, shape), (p₂, shape)], operator.det (ops.mvn_iso_kl shape)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
end
| (term.mvn_iso_empirical_kl t₁ t₂ t₃) st ident :=
match process_term t₁ st none with
| ((p₁, shape''), st') :=
match process_term t₂ st' none with
| ((p₂, shape'), st'') :=
match process_term t₃ st'' none with
| ((p₃, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
((get_id next_id ident, []), ⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, []), [(p₁, shape), (p₂, shape), (p₃, shape)], operator.det (det.op.mvn_iso_empirical_kl shape)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
end
end
| (term.bernoulli_neglogpdf t₁ t₂) st ident :=
match process_term t₁ st none with
| ((p₁, shape'), st') :=
match process_term t₂ st' none with
| ((p₂, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
((get_id next_id ident, []),
⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, []), [(p₁, shape), (p₂, shape)], operator.det (ops.bernoulli_neglogpdf shape)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
end
| (term.id s) ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩ ident :=
match shapes^.find s with
| (some shape) := ((ID.str s, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩)
| none := (default _, empty_state)
end
def process_rterm : rterm → state → option ID → reference × state
| (rterm.mvn_iso t₁ t₂) st ident :=
match process_term t₁ st none with
| ((p₁, shape'), st') :=
match process_term t₂ st' none with
| ((p₂, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
((get_id next_id ident, shape),
⟨next_id+1, shapes,
concat nodes ⟨(get_id next_id ident, shape), [(p₁, shape), (p₂, shape)], operator.rand (rand.op.mvn_iso shape)⟩,
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
end
end
| (rterm.mvn_iso_std shape) ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩ ident :=
((get_id next_id ident, shape),
⟨next_id+1, shapes,
nodes ++ [⟨(get_id next_id ident, shape), [], operator.rand (rand.op.mvn_iso_std shape)⟩],
costs, targets, inputs⟩)
def program_to_graph_core : list statement → state → state
| [] st := st
| (statement.assign s t::statements) st :=
match process_term t st (some (ID.str s)) with
| ((_, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
program_to_graph_core statements ⟨next_id, shapes^.insert s shape, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩
end
| (statement.sample s t::statements) st :=
match process_rterm t st (some (ID.str s)) with
| ((_, shape), ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩) :=
program_to_graph_core statements ⟨next_id, shapes^.insert s shape, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩
end
| (statement.param s shape::statements) ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩ :=
program_to_graph_core statements ⟨next_id, shapes^.insert s shape, nodes, costs, concat targets (ID.str s, shape), concat inputs (ID.str s, shape)⟩
| (statement.input s shape::statements) ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩ :=
program_to_graph_core statements ⟨next_id, shapes^.insert s shape, nodes, costs, targets, concat inputs (ID.str s, shape)⟩
| (statement.cost s::statements) ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩ :=
program_to_graph_core statements ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, concat costs (ID.str s), targets, inputs⟩
end program
def program := list program.statement
def program_to_graph : program → graph
| prog := match program.program_to_graph_core prog program.empty_state with
| ⟨next_id, shapes, nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩ := ⟨nodes, costs, targets, inputs⟩
end
def mk_inputs : Π (g : graph), dvec T g^.inputs^.p2 → env
| g ws := env.insert_all g^.inputs ws
end certigrad
|
8ceeae44d5e612d31f039ed941c4ef91a257632f | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/computability/language.lean | 0357b29e888eaa984dc3580234aa4da42a3390a7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,075 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson.
-/
import data.finset.basic
/-!
# Languages
This file contains the definition and operations on formal languages over an alphabet. Note strings
are implemented as lists over the alphabet.
The operations in this file define a [Kleene algebra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleene_algebra)
over the languages.
-/
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} [dec : decidable_eq α]
/-- A language is a set of strings over an alphabet. -/
@[derive [has_mem (list α), has_singleton (list α), has_insert (list α), complete_lattice]]
def language (α) := set (list α)
namespace language
local attribute [reducible] language
instance : has_zero (language α) := ⟨(∅ : set _)⟩
instance : has_one (language α) := ⟨{[]}⟩
instance : inhabited (language α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_add (language α) := ⟨set.union⟩
instance : has_mul (language α) := ⟨λ l m, (l.prod m).image (λ p, p.1 ++ p.2)⟩
lemma zero_def : (0 : language α) = (∅ : set _) := rfl
lemma one_def : (1 : language α) = {[]} := rfl
lemma add_def (l m : language α) : l + m = l ∪ m := rfl
lemma mul_def (l m : language α) : l * m = (l.prod m).image (λ p, p.1 ++ p.2) := rfl
/-- The star of a language `L` is the set of all strings which can be written by concatenating
strings from `L`. -/
def star (l : language α) : language α :=
{ x | ∃ S : list (list α), x = S.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l}
lemma star_def (l : language α) :
l.star = { x | ∃ S : list (list α), x = S.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l} := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_one (x : list α) : x ∈ (1 : language α) ↔ x = [] := by refl
@[simp] lemma mem_add (l m : language α) (x : list α) : x ∈ l + m ↔ x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ m :=
by simp [add_def]
lemma mem_mul (l m : language α) (x : list α) : x ∈ l * m ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ l ∧ b ∈ m ∧ a ++ b = x :=
by simp [mul_def]
lemma mem_star (l : language α) (x : list α) :
x ∈ l.star ↔ ∃ S : list (list α), x = S.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l :=
by refl
private lemma mul_assoc_lang (l m n : language α) : (l * m) * n = l * (m * n) :=
by { ext x, simp [mul_def], tauto {closer := `[subst_vars, simp *] } }
private lemma one_mul_lang (l : language α) : 1 * l = l :=
by { ext x, simp [mul_def, one_def], tauto {closer := `[subst_vars, simp [*]] } }
private lemma mul_one_lang (l : language α) : l * 1 = l :=
by { ext x, simp [mul_def, one_def], tauto {closer := `[subst_vars, simp *] } }
private lemma left_distrib_lang (l m n : language α) : l * (m + n) = (l * m) + (l * n) :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mul_def, add_def, exists_and_distrib_left, set.mem_image2, set.image_prod,
set.mem_image, set.mem_prod, set.mem_union_eq, set.prod_union, prod.exists],
split,
{ rintro ⟨ y, z, (⟨ hy, hz ⟩ | ⟨ hy, hz ⟩), hx ⟩,
{ left,
exact ⟨ y, hy, z, hz, hx ⟩ },
{ right,
exact ⟨ y, hy, z, hz, hx ⟩ } },
{ rintro (⟨ y, hy, z, hz, hx ⟩ | ⟨ y, hy, z, hz, hx ⟩);
refine ⟨ y, z, _, hx ⟩,
{ left,
exact ⟨ hy, hz ⟩ },
{ right,
exact ⟨ hy, hz ⟩ } }
end
private lemma right_distrib_lang (l m n : language α) : (l + m) * n = (l * n) + (m * n) :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mul_def, set.mem_image, add_def, set.mem_prod, exists_and_distrib_left, set.mem_image2,
set.image_prod, set.mem_union_eq, set.prod_union, prod.exists],
split,
{ rintro ⟨ y, (hy | hy), z, hz, hx ⟩,
{ left,
exact ⟨ y, hy, z, hz, hx ⟩ },
{ right,
exact ⟨ y, hy, z, hz, hx ⟩ } },
{ rintro (⟨ y, hy, z, hz, hx ⟩ | ⟨ y, hy, z, hz, hx ⟩);
refine ⟨ y, _, z, hz, hx ⟩,
{ left,
exact hy },
{ right,
exact hy } }
end
instance : semiring (language α) :=
{ add := (+),
add_assoc := by simp [add_def, set.union_assoc],
zero := 0,
zero_add := by simp [zero_def, add_def],
add_zero := by simp [zero_def, add_def],
add_comm := by simp [add_def, set.union_comm],
mul := (*),
mul_assoc := mul_assoc_lang,
zero_mul := by simp [zero_def, mul_def],
mul_zero := by simp [zero_def, mul_def],
one := 1,
one_mul := one_mul_lang,
mul_one := mul_one_lang,
left_distrib := left_distrib_lang,
right_distrib := right_distrib_lang }
@[simp] lemma add_self (l : language α) : l + l = l := sup_idem
lemma star_def_nonempty (l : language α) :
l.star = { x | ∃ S : list (list α), x = S.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l ∧ y ≠ []} :=
begin
ext x,
rw star_def,
split,
{ rintro ⟨ S, hx, h ⟩,
refine ⟨ S.filter (λ l, ¬list.empty l), _, _ ⟩,
{ rw hx,
induction S with y S ih generalizing x,
{ refl },
{ rw list.filter,
cases y with a y,
{ apply ih,
{ intros y hy,
apply h,
rw list.mem_cons_iff,
right,
assumption },
{ refl } },
{ simp only [true_and, list.join, eq_ff_eq_not_eq_tt, if_true, list.cons_append,
list.empty, eq_self_iff_true],
rw list.append_right_inj,
simp only [eq_ff_eq_not_eq_tt, forall_eq] at ih,
apply ih,
intros y hy,
apply h,
rw list.mem_cons_iff,
right,
assumption } } },
{ intros y hy,
simp only [eq_ff_eq_not_eq_tt, list.mem_filter] at hy,
finish } },
{ rintro ⟨ S, hx, h ⟩,
refine ⟨ S, hx, _ ⟩,
finish }
end
lemma le_iff (l m : language α) : l ≤ m ↔ l + m = m := sup_eq_right.symm
lemma le_mul_congr {l₁ l₂ m₁ m₂ : language α} : l₁ ≤ m₁ → l₂ ≤ m₂ → l₁ * l₂ ≤ m₁ * m₂ :=
begin
intros h₁ h₂ x hx,
simp only [mul_def, exists_and_distrib_left, set.mem_image2, set.image_prod] at hx ⊢,
tauto
end
lemma le_add_congr {l₁ l₂ m₁ m₂ : language α} : l₁ ≤ m₁ → l₂ ≤ m₂ → l₁ + l₂ ≤ m₁ + m₂ := sup_le_sup
lemma supr_mul {ι : Sort v} (l : ι → language α) (m : language α) :
(⨆ i, l i) * m = ⨆ i, l i * m :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_mul, set.mem_Union, exists_and_distrib_left],
tauto
end
lemma mul_supr {ι : Sort v} (l : ι → language α) (m : language α) :
m * (⨆ i, l i) = ⨆ i, m * l i :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_mul, set.mem_Union, exists_and_distrib_left],
tauto
end
lemma supr_add {ι : Sort v} [nonempty ι] (l : ι → language α) (m : language α) :
(⨆ i, l i) + m = ⨆ i, l i + m := supr_sup
lemma add_supr {ι : Sort v} [nonempty ι] (l : ι → language α) (m : language α) :
m + (⨆ i, l i) = ⨆ i, m + l i := sup_supr
lemma star_eq_supr_pow (l : language α) : l.star = ⨆ i : ℕ, l ^ i :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [star_def, set.mem_Union, set.mem_set_of_eq],
split,
{ revert x,
rintros _ ⟨ S, rfl, hS ⟩,
induction S with x S ih,
{ use 0,
tauto },
{ specialize ih _,
{ exact λ y hy, hS _ (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ hy) },
{ cases ih with i ih,
use i.succ,
rw [pow_succ, mem_mul],
exact ⟨ x, S.join, hS x (list.mem_cons_self _ _), ih, rfl ⟩ } } },
{ rintro ⟨ i, hx ⟩,
induction i with i ih generalizing x,
{ rw [pow_zero, mem_one] at hx,
subst hx,
use [[]],
tauto },
{ rw [pow_succ, mem_mul] at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨ a, b, ha, hb, hx ⟩,
rcases ih b hb with ⟨ S, hb, hS ⟩,
use a :: S,
rw list.join,
refine ⟨hb ▸ hx.symm, λ y, or.rec (λ hy, _) (hS _)⟩,
exact hy.symm ▸ ha } }
end
lemma mul_self_star_comm (l : language α) : l.star * l = l * l.star :=
by simp [star_eq_supr_pow, mul_supr, supr_mul, ← pow_succ, ← pow_succ']
@[simp] lemma one_add_self_mul_star_eq_star (l : language α) : 1 + l * l.star = l.star :=
begin
rw [star_eq_supr_pow, mul_supr, add_def, supr_split_single (λ i, l ^ i) 0],
have h : (⨆ (i : ℕ), l * l ^ i) = ⨆ (i : ℕ) (h : i ≠ 0), (λ (i : ℕ), l ^ i) i,
{ ext x,
simp only [exists_prop, set.mem_Union, ne.def],
split,
{ rintro ⟨ i, hi ⟩,
use [i.succ, nat.succ_ne_zero i],
rwa pow_succ },
{ rintro ⟨ (_ | i), h0, hi ⟩,
{ contradiction },
use i,
rwa ←pow_succ } },
rw h,
refl
end
@[simp] lemma one_add_star_mul_self_eq_star (l : language α) : 1 + l.star * l = l.star :=
by rw [mul_self_star_comm, one_add_self_mul_star_eq_star]
lemma star_mul_le_right_of_mul_le_right (l m : language α) : l * m ≤ m → l.star * m ≤ m :=
begin
intro h,
rw [star_eq_supr_pow, supr_mul],
refine supr_le _,
intro n,
induction n with n ih,
{ simp },
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc (l^n) l m],
exact le_trans (le_mul_congr (le_refl _) h) ih,
end
lemma star_mul_le_left_of_mul_le_left (l m : language α) : m * l ≤ m → m * l.star ≤ m :=
begin
intro h,
rw [star_eq_supr_pow, mul_supr],
refine supr_le _,
intro n,
induction n with n ih,
{ simp },
rw [pow_succ, ←mul_assoc m l (l^n)],
exact le_trans (le_mul_congr h (le_refl _)) ih
end
end language
|
205f142bfa5f21811679f0a5b1964d627bfc4d0d | ee8cdbabf07f77e7be63a449b8483ce308d37218 | /lean/src/valid/mathd-algebra-126.lean | 7fa11055d4f40bf01b9aca916eda4b3cb0f6ab12 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"MIT"
] | permissive | zeta1999/miniF2F | 6d66c75d1c18152e224d07d5eed57624f731d4b7 | c1ba9629559c5273c92ec226894baa0c1ce27861 | refs/heads/main | 1,681,897,460,642 | 1,620,646,361,000 | 1,620,646,361,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 290 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 OpenAI. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kunhao Zheng
-/
import data.real.basic
example (x y : ℝ) (h₀ : 2 * 3 = x - 9) (h₁ : 2 * (-5) = y + 1) : x = 15 ∧ y = -11 :=
begin
split; linarith,
end
|
e5c73c243040b013a9776fc833d7828eaa9d6db3 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/algebra/category/FinVect.lean | f573389dabe8b12659133f2ad69382d2d1afa90e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,828 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
-/
import category_theory.monoidal.rigid
import linear_algebra.tensor_product_basis
import linear_algebra.coevaluation
import algebra.category.Module.monoidal
/-!
# The category of finite dimensional vector spaces
This introduces `FinVect K`, the category of finite dimensional vector spaces on a field `K`.
It is implemented as a full subcategory on a subtype of `Module K`.
We first create the instance as a category, then as a monoidal category and then as a rigid monoidal
category.
## Future work
* Show that `FinVect K` is a symmetric monoidal category.
-/
noncomputable theory
open category_theory Module.monoidal_category
open_locale classical big_operators
universes u
variables (K : Type u) [field K]
/-- Define `FinVect` as the subtype of `Module.{u} K` of finite dimensional vector spaces. -/
@[derive [category, λ α, has_coe_to_sort α (Sort*)]]
def FinVect := { V : Module.{u} K // finite_dimensional K V }
namespace FinVect
instance finite_dimensional (V : FinVect K): finite_dimensional K V := V.prop
instance : inhabited (FinVect K) := ⟨⟨Module.of K K, finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_self K⟩⟩
instance : has_coe (FinVect.{u} K) (Module.{u} K) := { coe := λ V, V.1, }
protected lemma coe_comp {U V W : FinVect K} (f : U ⟶ V) (g : V ⟶ W) :
((f ≫ g) : U → W) = (g : V → W) ∘ (f : U → V) := rfl
instance monoidal_category : monoidal_category (FinVect K) :=
monoidal_category.full_monoidal_subcategory
(λ V, finite_dimensional K V)
(finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_self K)
(λ X Y hX hY, by exactI finite_dimensional_tensor_product X Y)
variables (V : FinVect K)
/-- The dual module is the dual in the rigid monoidal category `FinVect K`. -/
def FinVect_dual : FinVect K :=
⟨Module.of K (module.dual K V), subspace.module.dual.finite_dimensional⟩
instance : has_coe_to_fun (FinVect_dual K V) (λ _, V → K) :=
{ coe := λ v, by { change V →ₗ[K] K at v, exact v, } }
open category_theory.monoidal_category
/-- The coevaluation map is defined in `linear_algebra.coevaluation`. -/
def FinVect_coevaluation : 𝟙_ (FinVect K) ⟶ V ⊗ (FinVect_dual K V) :=
by apply coevaluation K V
lemma FinVect_coevaluation_apply_one : FinVect_coevaluation K V (1 : K) =
∑ (i : basis.of_vector_space_index K V),
(basis.of_vector_space K V) i ⊗ₜ[K] (basis.of_vector_space K V).coord i :=
by apply coevaluation_apply_one K V
/-- The evaluation morphism is given by the contraction map. -/
def FinVect_evaluation : (FinVect_dual K V) ⊗ V ⟶ 𝟙_ (FinVect K) :=
by apply contract_left K V
@[simp]
lemma FinVect_evaluation_apply (f : (FinVect_dual K V)) (x : V) :
(FinVect_evaluation K V) (f ⊗ₜ x) = f x :=
by apply contract_left_apply f x
private theorem coevaluation_evaluation :
let V' : FinVect K := FinVect_dual K V in
(𝟙 V' ⊗ (FinVect_coevaluation K V)) ≫ (α_ V' V V').inv ≫ (FinVect_evaluation K V ⊗ 𝟙 V')
= (ρ_ V').hom ≫ (λ_ V').inv :=
by apply contract_left_assoc_coevaluation K V
private theorem evaluation_coevaluation :
(FinVect_coevaluation K V ⊗ 𝟙 V)
≫ (α_ V (FinVect_dual K V) V).hom ≫ (𝟙 V ⊗ FinVect_evaluation K V)
= (λ_ V).hom ≫ (ρ_ V).inv :=
by apply contract_left_assoc_coevaluation' K V
instance exact_pairing : exact_pairing V (FinVect_dual K V) :=
{ coevaluation := FinVect_coevaluation K V,
evaluation := FinVect_evaluation K V,
coevaluation_evaluation' := coevaluation_evaluation K V,
evaluation_coevaluation' := evaluation_coevaluation K V }
instance right_dual : has_right_dual V := ⟨FinVect_dual K V⟩
instance right_rigid_category : right_rigid_category (FinVect K) := { }
end FinVect
|
2843ae189751c5f7775e95d3073f3231906a294f | 1dd482be3f611941db7801003235dc84147ec60a | /src/data/set/basic.lean | a65d834b0cd2bed34863821f64046b12f667ebeb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sanderdahmen/mathlib | 479039302bd66434bb5672c2a4cecf8d69981458 | 8f0eae75cd2d8b7a083cf935666fcce4565df076 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,491,322,775 | 1,549,672,060,000 | 1,549,672,060,000 | 169,748,224 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,549,636,694,000 | 1,549,636,694,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 48,060 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import tactic.ext tactic.finish data.subtype tactic.interactive
open function
/- set coercion to a type -/
namespace set
instance {α : Type*} : has_coe_to_sort (set α) := ⟨_, λ s, {x // x ∈ s}⟩
end set
section set_coe
universe u
variables {α : Type u}
theorem set.set_coe_eq_subtype (s : set α) :
coe_sort.{(u+1) (u+2)} s = {x // x ∈ s} := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_coe.forall {s : set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ (∀ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩) :=
subtype.forall
@[simp] theorem set_coe.exists {s : set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ (∃ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩) :=
subtype.exists
@[simp] theorem set_coe_cast : ∀ {s t : set α} (H' : s = t) (H : @eq (Type u) s t) (x : s),
cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| s _ rfl _ ⟨x, h⟩ := rfl
theorem set_coe.ext {s : set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b → a = b :=
subtype.eq
theorem set_coe.ext_iff {s : set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro set_coe.ext (assume h, h ▸ rfl)
end set_coe
lemma subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s := p.property
namespace set
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {a : α} {s t : set α}
instance : inhabited (set α) := ⟨∅⟩
@[extensionality]
theorem ext {a b : set α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b) : a = b :=
funext (assume x, propext (h x))
theorem ext_iff (s t : set α) : s = t ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h, ext⟩
@[trans] theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {α : Type u} {x : α} {s t : set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
/- mem and set_of -/
@[simp] theorem mem_set_of_eq {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ {a | p a} = p a := rfl
@[simp] theorem nmem_set_of_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} : a ∉ {a : α | P a} = ¬ P a := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_of_mem_eq {s : set α} : {x | x ∈ s} = s := rfl
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a := iff.rfl
instance decidable_mem (s : set α) [H : decidable_pred s] : ∀ a, decidable (a ∈ s) := H
instance decidable_set_of (p : α → Prop) [H : decidable_pred p] : decidable_pred {a | p a} := H
@[simp] theorem set_of_subset_set_of {p q : α → Prop} : {a | p a} ⊆ {a | q a} ↔ (∀a, p a → q a) := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma sep_set_of {α} {p q : α → Prop} : {a ∈ {a | p a } | q a} = {a | p a ∧ q a} :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma set_of_mem {α} {s : set α} : {a | a ∈ s} = s := rfl
/- subset -/
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def {s t : set α} : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := rfl
@[refl] theorem subset.refl (a : set α) : a ⊆ a := assume x, id
@[trans] theorem subset.trans {a b c : set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c :=
assume x h, bc (ab h)
@[trans] theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {α : Type u} {x y : α} {s : set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
theorem subset.antisymm {a b : set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
ext (λ x, iff.intro (λ ina, h₁ ina) (λ inb, h₂ inb))
theorem subset.antisymm_iff {a b : set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨λ e, e ▸ ⟨subset.refl _, subset.refl _⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
-- an alterantive name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
subset.antisymm h₁ h₂
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : set α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
assume h₁ h₂, h₁ h₂
theorem not_subset : (¬ s ⊆ t) ↔ ∃a, a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t :=
by simp [subset_def, classical.not_forall]
/- strict subset -/
/-- `s ⊂ t` means that `s` is a strict subset of `t`, that is, `s ⊆ t` but `s ≠ t`. -/
def strict_subset (s t : set α) := s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t
instance : has_ssubset (set α) := ⟨strict_subset⟩
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t) := rfl
lemma exists_of_ssubset {α : Type u} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : (∃x∈t, x ∉ s) :=
classical.by_contradiction $ assume hn,
have t ⊆ s, from assume a hat, classical.by_contradiction $ assume has, hn ⟨a, hat, has⟩,
h.2 $ subset.antisymm h.1 this
lemma ssubset_iff_subset_not_subset {s t : set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ¬ t ⊆ s :=
by split; simp [set.ssubset_def, ne.def, set.subset.antisymm_iff] {contextual := tt}
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬ (x ∈ (∅ : set α)) :=
assume h : x ∈ ∅, h
@[simp] theorem not_not_mem [decidable (a ∈ s)] : ¬ (a ∉ s) ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
/- empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : set α) = {x | false} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_empty_eq (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : set α) = false := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_of_false : {a : α | false} = ∅ := rfl
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
by simp [ext_iff]
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ :=
by { intro hs, rw hs at h, apply not_mem_empty _ h }
@[simp] theorem empty_subset (s : set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
assume x, assume h, false.elim h
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
by simp [subset.antisymm_iff]
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
theorem ne_empty_iff_exists_mem {s : set α} : s ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable;
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_empty {s : set α} : s ≠ ∅ → ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1
theorem coe_nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : set α} : nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
nonempty_subtype.trans ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.symm
-- TODO: remove when simplifier stops rewriting `a ≠ b` to `¬ a = b`
theorem not_eq_empty_iff_exists {s : set α} : ¬ (s = ∅) ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
ne_empty_iff_exists_mem
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 $ e ▸ h
theorem subset_ne_empty {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : t ≠ ∅ → s ≠ ∅ :=
mt (subset_eq_empty h)
theorem ball_empty_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ (∅ : set α), p x) ↔ true :=
by simp [iff_def]
/- universal set -/
theorem univ_def : @univ α = {x | true} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_univ (x : α) : x ∈ @univ α := trivial
theorem empty_ne_univ [h : inhabited α] : (∅ : set α) ≠ univ :=
by simp [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem subset_univ (s : set α) : s ⊆ univ := λ x H, trivial
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
by simp [subset.antisymm_iff]
theorem eq_univ_of_univ_subset {s : set α} : univ ⊆ s → s = univ :=
univ_subset_iff.1
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
by simp [ext_iff]
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ := eq_univ_iff_forall.2
@[simp] lemma univ_eq_empty_iff {α : Type*} : (univ : set α) = ∅ ↔ ¬ nonempty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans ⟨λ H ⟨x⟩, H x trivial, λ H x _, H ⟨x⟩⟩
lemma nonempty_iff_univ_ne_empty {α : Type*} : nonempty α ↔ (univ : set α) ≠ ∅ :=
by classical; exact iff_not_comm.1 univ_eq_empty_iff
lemma exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [nonempty α], ∃x:α, x ∈ (univ : set α)
| ⟨x⟩ := ⟨x, trivial⟩
@[simp] lemma univ_ne_empty {α} [h : nonempty α] : (univ : set α) ≠ ∅ :=
λ e, univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e h
instance univ_decidable : decidable_pred (@set.univ α) :=
λ x, is_true trivial
/- union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : set α} (b : set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b := or.inl
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : set α} (a : set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b := or.inr
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := H
theorem mem_union.elim {x : α} {a b : set α} {P : Prop}
(H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P) (H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union_eq (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b = (x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem union_self (a : set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext (assume x, or_self _)
@[simp] theorem union_empty (a : set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext (assume x, or_false _)
@[simp] theorem empty_union (a : set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext (assume x, false_or _)
theorem union_comm (a b : set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext (assume x, or.comm)
theorem union_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∪ b) ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext (assume x, or.assoc)
instance union_is_assoc : is_associative (set α) (∪) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
instance union_is_comm : is_commutative (set α) (∪) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
by finish
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
by finish
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
by finish [subset_def, ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
by finish [subset_def, ext_iff, iff_def]
@[simp] theorem subset_union_left (s t : set α) : s ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x, or.inl
@[simp] theorem subset_union_right (s t : set α) : t ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x, or.inr
theorem union_subset {s t r : set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r :=
by finish [subset_def, union_def]
@[simp] theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
by finish [iff_def, subset_def]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h (by refl)
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union (by refl) h
@[simp] theorem union_empty_iff {s t : set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ :=
⟨by finish [ext_iff], by finish [ext_iff]⟩
/- intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_eq (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b = (x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b) := rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
@[simp] theorem inter_self (a : set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext (assume x, and_self _)
@[simp] theorem inter_empty (a : set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext (assume x, and_false _)
@[simp] theorem empty_inter (a : set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext (assume x, false_and _)
theorem inter_comm (a b : set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext (assume x, and.comm)
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∩ b) ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext (assume x, and.assoc)
instance inter_is_assoc : is_associative (set α) (∩) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
instance inter_is_comm : is_commutative (set α) (∩) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
by finish
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
by finish
@[simp] theorem inter_subset_left (s t : set α) : s ∩ t ⊆ s := λ x H, and.left H
@[simp] theorem inter_subset_right (s t : set α) : s ∩ t ⊆ t := λ x H, and.right H
theorem subset_inter {s t r : set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t :=
by finish [subset_def, inter_def]
@[simp] theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨subset.trans h (inter_subset_left _ _), subset.trans h (inter_subset_right _ _)⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, subset_inter h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp] theorem inter_univ (a : set α) : a ∩ univ = a :=
ext (assume x, and_true _)
@[simp] theorem univ_inter (a : set α) : univ ∩ a = a :=
ext (assume x, true_and _)
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : set α} (u : set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : set α} (u : set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ t = s :=
by finish [subset_def, ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∩ t = t :=
by finish [subset_def, ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
-- TODO(Mario): remove?
theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_right {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : t ≠ ∅ :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_left {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : s ≠ ∅ :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
/- distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
ext (assume x, and_or_distrib_left)
theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
ext (assume x, or_and_distrib_right)
theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
ext (assume x, or_and_distrib_left)
theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
ext (assume x, and_or_distrib_right)
/- insert -/
theorem insert_def (x : α) (s : set α) : insert x s = { y | y = x ∨ y ∈ s } := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_of_has_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : has_insert.insert x s = insert x s := rfl
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : s ⊆ insert x s :=
assume y ys, or.inr ys
theorem mem_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : x ∈ insert x s :=
or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : α} {s : set α} (y : α) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s := or.inr
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s := id
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne {x a : α} {s : set α} (xin : x ∈ insert a s) : x ≠ a → x ∈ s :=
by finish [insert_def]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s ↔ (x = a ∨ x ∈ s) := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem insert_subset : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ (a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t) :=
by simp [subset_def, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem insert_subset_insert (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
assume a', or.imp_right (@h a')
theorem ssubset_insert {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
by finish [ssubset_def, ext_iff]
theorem insert_comm (a b : α) (s : set α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext $ by simp [or.left_comm]
theorem insert_union : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext $ assume a, by simp [or.comm, or.left_comm]
@[simp] theorem union_insert : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext $ assume a, by simp [or.comm, or.left_comm]
-- TODO(Jeremy): make this automatic
theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : set α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
by safe [ext_iff, iff_def]; have h' := a_1 a; finish
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x) :
∀ x, x ∈ s → P x :=
by finish
theorem forall_insert_of_forall {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s → P x) (ha : P a) :
∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x :=
by finish
theorem ball_insert_iff {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} :
(∀ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ (∀x ∈ s, P x) :=
by finish [iff_def]
/- singletons -/
theorem singleton_def (a : α) : ({a} : set α) = insert a ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton_iff {a b : α} : a ∈ ({b} : set α) ↔ a = b :=
by finish [singleton_def]
-- TODO: again, annotation needed
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : set α) := by finish
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : set α)) : x = y :=
by finish
@[simp] theorem singleton_eq_singleton_iff {x y : α} : {x} = ({y} : set α) ↔ x = y :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : α} (H : x = y) : x ∈ ({y} : set α) :=
by finish
theorem insert_eq (x : α) (s : set α) : insert x s = ({x} : set α) ∪ s :=
by finish [ext_iff, or_comm]
@[simp] theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : set α) = {a} :=
by finish
@[simp] theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : set α) ≠ ∅ := insert_ne_empty _ _
@[simp] theorem singleton_subset_iff {a : α} {s : set α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨λh, h (by simp), λh b e, by simp at e; simp [*]⟩
theorem set_compr_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : {b | b = a} = {a} :=
ext $ by simp
@[simp] theorem union_singleton : s ∪ {a} = insert a s :=
by simp [singleton_def]
@[simp] theorem singleton_union : {a} ∪ s = insert a s :=
by rw [union_comm, union_singleton]
theorem singleton_inter_eq_empty : {a} ∩ s = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
theorem inter_singleton_eq_empty : s ∩ {a} = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_eq_empty]
/- separation -/
theorem mem_sep {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} :=
⟨xs, px⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sep_eq {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} = (x ∈ s ∧ p x) := rfl
theorem mem_sep_iff {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
iff.rfl
theorem eq_sep_of_subset {s t : set α} (ssubt : s ⊆ t) : s = {x ∈ t | x ∈ s} :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def, subset_def]
theorem sep_subset (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) : {x ∈ s | p x} ⊆ s :=
assume x, and.left
theorem forall_not_of_sep_empty {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : {x ∈ s | p x} = ∅) :
∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x :=
by finish [ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma sep_univ {α} {p : α → Prop} : {a ∈ (univ : set α) | p a} = {a | p a} :=
set.ext $ by simp
/- complement -/
theorem mem_compl {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ -s := h
lemma compl_set_of {α} (p : α → Prop) : - {a | p a} = { a | ¬ p a } := rfl
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ -s) : x ∉ s := h
@[simp] theorem mem_compl_eq (s : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ -s = (x ∉ s) := rfl
theorem mem_compl_iff (s : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ -s ↔ x ∉ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_compl_self (s : set α) : s ∩ -s = ∅ :=
by finish [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem compl_inter_self (s : set α) : -s ∩ s = ∅ :=
by finish [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem compl_empty : -(∅ : set α) = univ :=
by finish [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem compl_union (s t : set α) : -(s ∪ t) = -s ∩ -t :=
by finish [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem compl_compl (s : set α) : -(-s) = s :=
by finish [ext_iff]
-- ditto
theorem compl_inter (s t : set α) : -(s ∩ t) = -s ∪ -t :=
by finish [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem compl_univ : -(univ : set α) = ∅ :=
by finish [ext_iff]
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : set α) : s ∪ t = -(-s ∩ -t) :=
by simp [compl_inter, compl_compl]
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : set α) : s ∩ t = -(-s ∪ -t) :=
by simp [compl_compl]
@[simp] theorem union_compl_self (s : set α) : s ∪ -s = univ :=
by finish [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem compl_union_self (s : set α) : -s ∪ s = univ :=
by finish [ext_iff]
theorem compl_comp_compl : compl ∘ compl = @id (set α) :=
funext compl_compl
theorem compl_subset_comm {s t : set α} : -s ⊆ t ↔ -t ⊆ s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
forall_congr (λ a, not_imp_comm)
lemma compl_subset_compl {s t : set α} : -s ⊆ -t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
by rw [compl_subset_comm, compl_compl]
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : set α} : -s ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
iff.symm $ eq_univ_iff_forall.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a,
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem subset_compl_comm {s t : set α} : s ⊆ -t ↔ t ⊆ -s :=
forall_congr $ λ a, imp_not_comm
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint {s t : set α} : s ⊆ -t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ a, and_imp.symm) subset_empty_iff
theorem inter_subset (a b c : set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ -b ∪ c :=
begin
haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
split,
{ intros h x xa, by_cases h' : x ∈ b, simp [h ⟨xa, h'⟩], simp [h'] },
intros h x, rintro ⟨xa, xb⟩, cases h xa, contradiction, assumption
end
/- set difference -/
theorem diff_eq (s t : set α) : s \ t = s ∩ -t := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_diff {s t : set α} (x : α) : x ∈ s \ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := iff.rfl
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {s t : set α} {x : α} (h1 : x ∈ s) (h2 : x ∉ t) : x ∈ s \ t :=
⟨h1, h2⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ (t \ s) = t :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def, subset_def]
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def, subset_def]
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def, subset_def]
theorem union_diff_left {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem union_diff_right {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
inter_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem inter_diff_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) :=
inter_assoc _ _ _
theorem inter_diff_self (a b : set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
by finish [ext_iff]
theorem inter_union_diff (s t : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ (s \ t) = s :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem diff_subset (s t : set α) : s \ t ⊆ s :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
by finish [subset_def]
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
diff_subset_diff h (by refl)
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
diff_subset_diff (subset.refl s) h
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : set α) : -s = univ \ s :=
by finish [ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma empty_diff {α : Type*} (s : set α) : (∅ \ s : set α) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨hx, _⟩, hx
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h x hx, classical.by_contradiction $ assume : x ∉ t, show x ∈ (∅ : set α), from h ▸ ⟨hx, this⟩,
assume h, eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨hx, hnx⟩, hnx $ h hx⟩
@[simp] theorem diff_empty {s : set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
ext $ assume x, ⟨assume ⟨hx, _⟩, hx, assume h, ⟨h, not_false⟩⟩
theorem diff_diff {u : set α} : s \ t \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
ext $ by simp [not_or_distrib, and.comm, and.left_comm]
lemma diff_subset_iff {s t u : set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
⟨assume h x xs, classical.by_cases or.inl (assume nxt, or.inr (h ⟨xs, nxt⟩)),
assume h x ⟨xs, nxt⟩, or.resolve_left (h xs) nxt⟩
lemma diff_subset_comm {s t u : set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
by rw [diff_subset_iff, diff_subset_iff, union_comm]
@[simp] theorem insert_diff (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s \ t = s \ t :=
ext $ by intro; constructor; simp [or_imp_distrib, h] {contextual := tt}
theorem union_diff_self {s t : set α} : s ∪ (t \ s) = s ∪ t :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem diff_union_self {s t : set α} : (s \ t) ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
by rw [union_comm, union_diff_self, union_comm]
theorem diff_inter_self {a b : set α} : (b \ a) ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext $ by simp [iff_def] {contextual:=tt}
theorem diff_eq_self {s t : set α} : s \ t = s ↔ t ∩ s ⊆ ∅ :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def, subset_def]
@[simp] theorem diff_singleton_eq_self {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∉ s) : s \ {a} = s :=
diff_eq_self.2 $ by simp [singleton_inter_eq_empty.2 h]
@[simp] theorem insert_diff_singleton {a : α} {s : set α} :
insert a (s \ {a}) = insert a s :=
by simp [insert_eq, union_diff_self, -union_singleton, -singleton_union]
@[simp] lemma diff_self {s : set α} : s \ s = ∅ := ext $ by simp
/- powerset -/
theorem mem_powerset {x s : set α} (h : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ powerset s := h
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : set α} (h : x ∈ powerset s) : x ⊆ s := h
theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : set α) : x ∈ powerset s ↔ x ⊆ s := iff.rfl
/- inverse image -/
/-- The preimage of `s : set β` by `f : α → β`, written `f ⁻¹' s`,
is the set of `x : α` such that `f x ∈ s`. -/
def preimage {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β) : set α := {x | f x ∈ s}
infix ` ⁻¹' `:80 := preimage
section preimage
variables {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp] theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_preimage_eq {s : set β} {a : α} : (a ∈ f ⁻¹' s) = (f a ∈ s) := rfl
theorem preimage_mono {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
assume x hx, h hx
@[simp] theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_inter {s t : set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_union {s t : set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_compl {s : set β} : f ⁻¹' (- s) = - (f ⁻¹' s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : set β) :
f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_set_of_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' {a | p a} = {a | p (f a)} :=
rfl
theorem preimage_id {s : set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s := rfl
theorem preimage_comp {s : set γ} : (g ∘ f) ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) := rfl
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : set (subtype p)} {t : set α} :
s = subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ (∀x (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) :=
⟨assume s_eq x h, by rw [s_eq]; simp,
assume h, ext $ assume ⟨x, hx⟩, by simp [h]⟩
end preimage
/- function image -/
section image
infix ` '' `:80 := image
/-- Two functions `f₁ f₂ : α → β` are equal on `s`
if `f₁ x = f₂ x` for all `x ∈ a`. -/
@[reducible] def eq_on (f1 f2 : α → β) (a : set α) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ a, f1 x = f2 x
-- TODO(Jeremy): use bounded exists in image
theorem mem_image_iff_bex {f : α → β} {s : set α} {y : β} :
y ∈ f '' s ↔ ∃ x (_ : x ∈ s), f x = y := bex_def.symm
theorem mem_image_eq (f : α → β) (s : set α) (y: β) : y ∈ f '' s = ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ f x = y := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_image (f : α → β) (s : set α) (y : β) : y ∈ f '' s ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ f x = y := iff.rfl
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {x : α} {a : set α} (h : x ∈ a) : f x ∈ f '' a :=
⟨_, h, rfl⟩
theorem mem_image_of_injective {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} (hf : injective f) :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨b, hb, eq⟩, (hf eq) ▸ hb)
(assume h, mem_image_of_mem _ h)
theorem ball_image_of_ball {f : α → β} {s : set α} {p : β → Prop}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) : ∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y :=
by finish [mem_image_eq]
@[simp] theorem ball_image_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
iff.intro
(assume h a ha, h _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
(assume h b ⟨a, ha, eq⟩, eq ▸ h a ha)
theorem mono_image {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t :=
assume x ⟨y, hy, y_eq⟩, y_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem _ $ h hy
theorem mem_image_elim {f : α → β} {s : set α} {C : β → Prop} (h : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s → C (f x)) :
∀{y : β}, y ∈ f '' s → C y
| ._ ⟨a, a_in, rfl⟩ := h a a_in
theorem mem_image_elim_on {f : α → β} {s : set α} {C : β → Prop} {y : β} (h_y : y ∈ f '' s)
(h : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s → C (f x)) : C y :=
mem_image_elim h h_y
@[congr] lemma image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : set α}
(h : ∀a∈s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s :=
by safe [ext_iff, iff_def]
theorem image_eq_image_of_eq_on {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {s : set α} (heq : eq_on f₁ f₂ s) :
f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : set α) : (f ∘ g) '' a = f '' (g '' a) :=
subset.antisymm
(ball_image_of_ball $ assume a ha, mem_image_of_mem _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
(ball_image_of_ball $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume a ha, mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
/- Proof is removed as it uses generated names
TODO(Jeremy): make automatic,
begin
safe [ext_iff, iff_def, mem_image, (∘)],
have h' := h_2 (g a_2),
finish
end -/
theorem image_subset {a b : set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b :=
by finish [subset_def, mem_image_eq]
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : set α) :
f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
by finish [ext_iff, iff_def, mem_image_eq]
@[simp] theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := ext $ by simp
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (h : ∀x∈t, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' s ∩ f '' t = f '' (s ∩ t) :=
subset.antisymm
(assume b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩,
have a₂ = a₁, from h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp *),
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩)
(subset_inter (mono_image $ inter_subset_left _ _) (mono_image $ inter_subset_right _ _))
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (H : injective f) :
f '' s ∩ f '' t = f '' (s ∩ t) :=
image_inter_on (assume x _ y _ h, H h)
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall $ by simp [image]; exact H
@[simp] theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} :=
ext $ λ x, by simp [image]; rw eq_comm
@[simp] lemma image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
by simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]; exact
⟨λ H a ha, H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, λ H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩, H _ ha⟩
lemma inter_singleton_ne_empty {α : Type*} {s : set α} {a : α} : s ∩ {a} ≠ ∅ ↔ a ∈ s :=
by finish [set.inter_singleton_eq_empty]
theorem fix_set_compl (t : set α) : compl t = - t := rfl
-- TODO(Jeremy): there is an issue with - t unfolding to compl t
theorem mem_compl_image (t : set α) (S : set (set α)) :
t ∈ compl '' S ↔ -t ∈ S :=
begin
suffices : ∀ x, -x = t ↔ -t = x, {simp [fix_set_compl, this]},
intro x, split; { intro e, subst e, simp }
end
@[simp] theorem image_id (s : set α) : id '' s = s := ext $ by simp
theorem compl_compl_image (S : set (set α)) :
compl '' (compl '' S) = S :=
by rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} :
f '' (insert a s) = insert (f a) (f '' s) :=
ext $ by simp [and_or_distrib_left, exists_or_distrib, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(I : left_inverse g f) (s : set α) : f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s :=
λ b ⟨a, h, e⟩, e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(I : left_inverse g f) (s : set β) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s :=
λ b h, ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) :
image f = preimage g :=
funext $ λ s, subset.antisymm
(image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s)
(preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : set α}
(h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) :
b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s :=
by rw image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂; refl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : injective f) : f '' -s ⊆ -(f '' s) :=
subset_compl_iff_disjoint.2 $ by simp [image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : surjective f) : -(f '' s) ⊆ f '' -s :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 $
by rw ← image_union; simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : bijective f) : f '' -s = -(f '' s) :=
subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
/- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
theorem image_subset_iff {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} :
f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
ball_image_iff
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 (subset.refl _)
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : set α) :
s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) :=
λ x, mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : set α) (h : injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
subset.antisymm
(λ x ⟨y, hy, e⟩, h e ▸ hy)
(subset_preimage_image f s)
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} {s : set β} (h : surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
subset.antisymm
(image_preimage_subset f s)
(λ x hx, let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x in ⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩)
lemma preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = preimage f t ↔ s = t :=
iff.intro
(assume eq, by rw [← @image_preimage_eq β α f s hf, ← @image_preimage_eq β α f t hf, eq])
(assume eq, eq ▸ rfl)
lemma surjective_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : surjective f) : injective (preimage f) :=
assume s t, (preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
theorem compl_image : image (@compl α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {α : Type u} {p : set α → Prop} :
compl '' {x | p x} = {x | p (- x)} :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : set α) (t : set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) :=
λ x h, ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : set α) (t : set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) :=
λ x h, or.elim h (λ l, or.inl $ mem_image_of_mem _ l) (λ r, or.inr r)
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
lemma preimage_subset_iff {A : set α} {B : set β} {f : α → β} :
f⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ (∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A) := iff.rfl
lemma image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
iff.symm $ iff.intro (assume eq, eq ▸ rfl) $ assume eq,
by rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
lemma image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
begin
refine (iff.symm $ iff.intro (image_subset f) $ assume h, _),
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf],
exact preimage_mono h
end
lemma injective_image {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) : injective (('') f) :=
assume s t, (image_eq_image hf).1
lemma prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : setoid α] (g : quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ quotient.mk) (r : set (β × β)) :
{x : quotient s × quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r} =
(λ a : α × α, (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((λ a : α × α, (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸ set.ext (λ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩, ⟨quotient.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂
(λ a₁ a₂ h, ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩),
λ ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩, show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r, from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := prod.ext_iff.1 h₂,
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩)
def image_factorization (f : α → β) (s : set α) : s → f '' s :=
λ p, ⟨f p.1, mem_image_of_mem f p.2⟩
lemma image_factorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
subtype.val ∘ image_factorization f s = f ∘ subtype.val :=
funext $ λ p, rfl
lemma surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
surjective (image_factorization f s) :=
λ ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
end image
theorem univ_eq_true_false : univ = ({true, false} : set Prop) :=
eq.symm $ eq_univ_of_forall $ classical.cases (by simp) (by simp)
section range
variables {f : ι → α}
open function
/-- Range of a function.
This function is more flexible than `f '' univ`, as the image requires that the domain is in Type
and not an arbitrary Sort. -/
def range (f : ι → α) : set α := {x | ∃y, f y = x}
@[simp] theorem mem_range {x : α} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x := iff.rfl
theorem mem_range_self (i : ι) : f i ∈ range f := ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem forall_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ (∀ i, p (f i)) :=
⟨assume h i, h (f i) (mem_range_self _), assume h a ⟨i, (hi : f i = a)⟩, hi ▸ h i⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ (∃ i, p (f i)) :=
⟨assume ⟨a, ⟨i, eq⟩, h⟩, ⟨i, eq.symm ▸ h⟩, assume ⟨i, h⟩, ⟨f i, mem_range_self _, h⟩⟩
theorem range_iff_surjective : range f = univ ↔ surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[simp] theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ := range_iff_surjective.2 surjective_id
@[simp] theorem image_univ {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} : f '' univ = range f :=
ext $ by simp [image, range]
theorem image_subset_range {ι : Type*} (f : ι → β) (s : set ι) : f '' s ⊆ range f :=
by rw ← image_univ; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem range_comp {g : α → β} : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f :=
subset.antisymm
(forall_range_iff.mpr $ assume i, mem_image_of_mem g (mem_range_self _))
(ball_image_iff.mpr $ forall_range_iff.mpr mem_range_self)
theorem range_subset_iff {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} {s : set β} : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_range_iff
lemma nonempty_of_nonempty_range {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {f : α → β} (H : ¬range f = ∅) : nonempty α :=
begin
cases exists_mem_of_ne_empty H with x h,
cases mem_range.1 h with y _,
exact ⟨y⟩
end
@[simp] lemma range_eq_empty {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} : range f = ∅ ↔ ¬ nonempty α :=
by rw ← set.image_univ; simp [-set.image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : set β} :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f :=
ext $ assume x, ⟨assume ⟨x, hx, heq⟩, heq ▸ ⟨hx, mem_range_self _⟩,
assume ⟨hx, ⟨y, h_eq⟩⟩, h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f $
show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t, by simp [preimage, h_eq, hx]⟩
lemma image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
by rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hs]
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
set.ext $ λ x, and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set β} :
f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s :=
by rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, preimage_inter_range]
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_range_eq [setoid α] : range (λx : α, ⟦x⟧) = univ :=
range_iff_surjective.2 quot.exists_rep
lemma range_const_subset {c : β} : range (λx:α, c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 $ λ x, or.inl rfl
@[simp] lemma range_const [h : nonempty α] {c : β} : range (λx:α, c) = {c} :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm range_const_subset (λy hy, _),
rw set.mem_singleton_iff.1 hy,
rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty α with ⟨x, _⟩,
exact mem_range_self x
end
def range_factorization (f : ι → β) : ι → range f :=
λ i, ⟨f i, mem_range_self i⟩
lemma range_factorization_eq {f : ι → β} :
subtype.val ∘ range_factorization f = f :=
funext $ λ i, rfl
lemma surjective_onto_range : surjective (range_factorization f) :=
λ ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩, ⟨i, rfl⟩
end range
/-- The set `s` is pairwise `r` if `r x y` for all *distinct* `x y ∈ s`. -/
def pairwise_on (s : set α) (r : α → α → Prop) := ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → r x y
theorem pairwise_on.mono {s t : set α} {r}
(h : t ⊆ s) (hp : pairwise_on s r) : pairwise_on t r :=
λ x xt y yt, hp x (h xt) y (h yt)
theorem pairwise_on.mono' {s : set α} {r r' : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, r a b → r' a b) (hp : pairwise_on s r) : pairwise_on s r' :=
λ x xs y ys h, H _ _ (hp x xs y ys h)
end set
/- image and preimage on subtypes -/
namespace subtype
variable {α : Type*}
lemma val_image {p : α → Prop} {s : set (subtype p)} :
subtype.val '' s = {x | ∃h : p x, (⟨x, h⟩ : subtype p) ∈ s} :=
set.ext $ assume a,
⟨assume ⟨⟨a', ha'⟩, in_s, h_eq⟩, h_eq ▸ ⟨ha', in_s⟩,
assume ⟨ha, in_s⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, in_s, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma val_range {p : α → Prop} :
set.range (@subtype.val _ p) = {x | p x} :=
by rw ← set.image_univ; simp [-set.image_univ, val_image]
theorem val_image_subset (s : set α) (t : set (subtype s)) : t.image val ⊆ s :=
λ x ⟨y, yt, yvaleq⟩, by rw ←yvaleq; exact y.property
theorem val_image_univ (s : set α) : @val _ s '' set.univ = s :=
set.eq_of_subset_of_subset (val_image_subset _ _) (λ x xs, ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, ⟨set.mem_univ _, rfl⟩⟩)
theorem image_preimage_val (s t : set α) :
(@subtype.val _ s) '' ((@subtype.val _ s) ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ s :=
begin
ext x, simp, split,
{ rintros ⟨y, ys, yt, yx⟩, rw ←yx, exact ⟨yt, ys⟩ },
rintros ⟨xt, xs⟩, exact ⟨x, xs, xt, rfl⟩
end
theorem preimage_val_eq_preimage_val_iff (s t u : set α) :
((@subtype.val _ s) ⁻¹' t = (@subtype.val _ s) ⁻¹' u) ↔ (t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :=
begin
rw [←image_preimage_val, ←image_preimage_val],
split, { intro h, rw h },
intro h, exact set.injective_image (val_injective) h
end
end subtype
namespace set
section range
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp] lemma subtype.val_range {p : α → Prop} :
range (@subtype.val _ p) = {x | p x} :=
by rw ← image_univ; simp [-image_univ, subtype.val_image]
@[simp] lemma range_coe_subtype (s : set α): range (coe : s → α) = s :=
subtype.val_range
end range
section prod
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables {s s₁ s₂ : set α} {t t₁ t₂ : set β}
/-- The cartesian product `prod s t` is the set of `(a, b)`
such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def prod (s : set α) (t : set β) : set (α × β) :=
{p | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t}
lemma prod_eq (s : set α) (t : set β) : set.prod s t = prod.fst ⁻¹' s ∩ prod.snd ⁻¹' t := rfl
theorem mem_prod_eq {p : α × β} : p ∈ set.prod s t = (p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_prod {p : α × β} : p ∈ set.prod s t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t := iff.rfl
lemma mk_mem_prod {a : α} {b : β} (a_in : a ∈ s) (b_in : b ∈ t) : (a, b) ∈ set.prod s t := ⟨a_in, b_in⟩
@[simp] theorem prod_empty {s : set α} : set.prod s ∅ = (∅ : set (α × β)) :=
ext $ by simp [set.prod]
@[simp] theorem empty_prod {t : set β} : set.prod ∅ t = (∅ : set (α × β)) :=
ext $ by simp [set.prod]
theorem insert_prod {a : α} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
set.prod (insert a s) t = (prod.mk a '' t) ∪ set.prod s t :=
ext begin simp [set.prod, image, iff_def, or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt}; cc end
theorem prod_insert {b : β} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
set.prod s (insert b t) = ((λa, (a, b)) '' s) ∪ set.prod s t :=
ext begin simp [set.prod, image, iff_def, or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt}; cc end
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
set.prod (preimage f s) (preimage g t) = preimage (λp, (f p.1, g p.2)) (set.prod s t) := rfl
theorem prod_mono {s₁ s₂ : set α} {t₁ t₂ : set β} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
set.prod s₁ t₁ ⊆ set.prod s₂ t₂ :=
assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
theorem prod_inter_prod : set.prod s₁ t₁ ∩ set.prod s₂ t₂ = set.prod (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
subset.antisymm
(assume ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨⟨ha₁, hb₁⟩, ⟨ha₂, hb₂⟩⟩, ⟨⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, ⟨hb₁, hb₂⟩⟩)
(subset_inter
(prod_mono (inter_subset_left _ _) (inter_subset_left _ _))
(prod_mono (inter_subset_right _ _) (inter_subset_right _ _)))
theorem image_swap_prod : (λp:β×α, (p.2, p.1)) '' set.prod t s = set.prod s t :=
ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp [mem_image_eq, set.prod, and_comm]; exact
⟨ assume ⟨b', a', ⟨h_a, h_b⟩, h⟩, by subst a'; subst b'; assumption,
assume h, ⟨b, a, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@prod.swap α β) = preimage prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse prod.swap_left_inverse prod.swap_right_inverse
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
set.prod (image m₁ s) (image m₂ t) = image (λp:α×β, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (set.prod s t) :=
ext $ by simp [-exists_and_distrib_right, exists_and_distrib_right.symm, and.left_comm, and.assoc, and.comm]
theorem prod_range_range_eq {α β γ δ} {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
set.prod (range m₁) (range m₂) = range (λp:α×β, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) :=
ext $ by simp [range]
@[simp] theorem prod_singleton_singleton {a : α} {b : β} :
set.prod {a} {b} = ({(a, b)} : set (α×β)) :=
ext $ by simp [set.prod]
theorem prod_neq_empty_iff {s : set α} {t : set β} :
set.prod s t ≠ ∅ ↔ (s ≠ ∅ ∧ t ≠ ∅) :=
by simp [not_eq_empty_iff_exists]
@[simp] theorem prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq {a : α} {b : β} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
(a, b) ∈ set.prod s t = (a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t) := rfl
@[simp] theorem univ_prod_univ : set.prod (@univ α) (@univ β) = univ :=
ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp
lemma prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
set.prod s t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W :=
by simp [subset_def]
end prod
section pi
variables {α : Type*} {π : α → Type*}
def pi (i : set α) (s : Πa, set (π a)) : set (Πa, π a) := { f | ∀a∈i, f a ∈ s a }
@[simp] lemma pi_empty_index (s : Πa, set (π a)) : pi ∅ s = univ := by ext; simp [pi]
@[simp] lemma pi_insert_index (a : α) (i : set α) (s : Πa, set (π a)) :
pi (insert a i) s = ((λf, f a) ⁻¹' s a) ∩ pi i s :=
by ext; simp [pi, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] lemma pi_singleton_index (a : α) (s : Πa, set (π a)) :
pi {a} s = ((λf:(Πa, π a), f a) ⁻¹' s a) :=
by ext; simp [pi]
lemma pi_if {p : α → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] (i : set α) (s t : Πa, set (π a)) :
pi i (λa, if p a then s a else t a) = pi {a ∈ i | p a} s ∩ pi {a ∈ i | ¬ p a} t :=
begin
ext f,
split,
{ assume h, split; { rintros a ⟨hai, hpa⟩, simpa [*] using h a } },
{ rintros ⟨hs, ht⟩ a hai,
by_cases p a; simp [*, pi] at * }
end
end pi
end set
|
8da37d77fd265e8ea3170e596f0053ed5b9c693b | 83c8119e3298c0bfc53fc195c41a6afb63d01513 | /library/init/logic.lean | 5eebe24fe52bf93084896d3d87f3222c5e318b88 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anfelor/lean | 584b91c4e87a6d95f7630c2a93fb082a87319ed0 | 31cfc2b6bf7d674f3d0f73848b842c9c9869c9f1 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,067,141,310 | 1,585,992,232,000 | 1,585,992,232,000 | 251,683,543 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,585,676,570,000 | 1,585,676,569,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 38,231 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Floris van Doorn
-/
prelude
import init.core
universes u v w
@[simp] lemma opt_param_eq (α : Sort u) (default : α) : opt_param α default = α :=
rfl
@[inline] def id {α : Sort u} (a : α) : α := a
def flip {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {φ : Sort w} (f : α → β → φ) : β → α → φ :=
λ b a, f a b
/- implication -/
def implies (a b : Prop) := a → b
@[trans] lemma implies.trans {p q r : Prop} (h₁ : implies p q) (h₂ : implies q r) : implies p r :=
assume hp, h₂ (h₁ hp)
def trivial : true := ⟨⟩
/-- We can't have `a` and `¬a`, that would be absurd!-/
@[inline] def absurd {a : Prop} {b : Sort v} (h₁ : a) (h₂ : ¬a) : b :=
false.rec b (h₂ h₁)
lemma not.intro {a : Prop} (h : a → false) : ¬ a :=
h
/-- Modus tollens.-/
lemma mt {a b : Prop} (h₁ : a → b) (h₂ : ¬b) : ¬a := assume ha : a, h₂ (h₁ ha)
/- not -/
lemma not_false : ¬false := id
def non_contradictory (a : Prop) : Prop := ¬¬a
lemma non_contradictory_intro {a : Prop} (ha : a) : ¬¬a :=
assume hna : ¬a, absurd ha hna
/- false -/
@[inline] def false.elim {C : Sort u} (h : false) : C :=
false.rec C h
/- eq -/
-- proof irrelevance is built in
lemma proof_irrel {a : Prop} (h₁ h₂ : a) : h₁ = h₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma id.def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
@[inline] def eq.mp {α β : Sort u} : (α = β) → α → β :=
eq.rec_on
@[inline] def eq.mpr {α β : Sort u} : (α = β) → β → α :=
λ h₁ h₂, eq.rec_on (eq.symm h₁) h₂
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma eq.substr {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {a b : α} (h₁ : b = a) : p a → p b :=
eq.subst (eq.symm h₁)
lemma congr {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : a₁ = a₂) : f₁ a₁ = f₂ a₂ :=
eq.subst h₁ (eq.subst h₂ rfl)
lemma congr_fun {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {f g : Π x, β x} (h : f = g) (a : α) : f a = g a :=
eq.subst h (eq.refl (f a))
lemma congr_arg {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {a₁ a₂ : α} (f : α → β) : a₁ = a₂ → f a₁ = f a₂ :=
congr rfl
lemma trans_rel_left {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (r : α → α → Prop) (h₁ : r a b) (h₂ : b = c) : r a c :=
h₂ ▸ h₁
lemma trans_rel_right {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (r : α → α → Prop) (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : r b c) : r a c :=
h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma of_eq_true {p : Prop} (h : p = true) : p :=
h.symm ▸ trivial
lemma not_of_eq_false {p : Prop} (h : p = false) : ¬p :=
assume hp, h ▸ hp
@[inline] def cast {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (a : α) : β :=
eq.rec a h
lemma cast_proof_irrel {α β : Sort u} (h₁ h₂ : α = β) (a : α) : cast h₁ a = cast h₂ a := rfl
lemma cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a := rfl
/- ne -/
@[reducible] def ne {α : Sort u} (a b : α) := ¬(a = b)
notation a ≠ b := ne a b
@[simp] lemma ne.def {α : Sort u} (a b : α) : a ≠ b = ¬ (a = b) := rfl
namespace ne
variable {α : Sort u}
variables {a b : α}
lemma intro (h : a = b → false) : a ≠ b := h
lemma elim (h : a ≠ b) : a = b → false := h
lemma irrefl (h : a ≠ a) : false := h rfl
lemma symm (h : a ≠ b) : b ≠ a :=
assume (h₁ : b = a), h (h₁.symm)
end ne
lemma false_of_ne {α : Sort u} {a : α} : a ≠ a → false := ne.irrefl
section
variables {p : Prop}
lemma ne_false_of_self : p → p ≠ false :=
assume (hp : p) (heq : p = false), heq ▸ hp
lemma ne_true_of_not : ¬p → p ≠ true :=
assume (hnp : ¬p) (heq : p = true), (heq ▸ hnp) trivial
lemma true_ne_false : ¬true = false :=
ne_false_of_self trivial
end
attribute [refl] heq.refl
section
variables {α β φ : Sort u} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : φ}
lemma heq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α → Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : a == b)
: p a → p b := eq.rec_on (eq_of_heq h₁)
lemma heq.subst {p : ∀ T : Sort u, T → Prop} : a == b → p α a → p β b :=
heq.rec_on
@[symm] lemma heq.symm (h : a == b) : b == a :=
heq.rec_on h (heq.refl a)
lemma heq_of_eq (h : a = a') : a == a' :=
eq.subst h (heq.refl a)
@[trans] lemma heq.trans (h₁ : a == b) (h₂ : b == c) : a == c :=
heq.subst h₂ h₁
@[trans] lemma heq_of_heq_of_eq (h₁ : a == b) (h₂ : b = b') : a == b' :=
heq.trans h₁ (heq_of_eq h₂)
@[trans] lemma heq_of_eq_of_heq (h₁ : a = a') (h₂ : a' == b) : a == b :=
heq.trans (heq_of_eq h₁) h₂
def type_eq_of_heq (h : a == b) : α = β :=
heq.rec_on h (eq.refl α)
end
lemma eq_rec_heq {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} (h : a = a') (p : φ a), (eq.rec_on h p : φ a') == p
| a _ rfl p := heq.refl p
lemma heq_of_eq_rec_left {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} {p₁ : φ a} {p₂ : φ a'} (e : a = a') (h₂ : (eq.rec_on e p₁ : φ a') = p₂), p₁ == p₂
| a _ p₁ p₂ rfl h := eq.rec_on h (heq.refl p₁)
lemma heq_of_eq_rec_right {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} {p₁ : φ a} {p₂ : φ a'} (e : a' = a) (h₂ : p₁ = eq.rec_on e p₂), p₁ == p₂
| a _ p₁ p₂ rfl h :=
have p₁ = p₂, from h,
this ▸ heq.refl p₁
lemma of_heq_true {a : Prop} (h : a == true) : a :=
of_eq_true (eq_of_heq h)
lemma eq_rec_compose : ∀ {α β φ : Sort u} (p₁ : β = φ) (p₂ : α = β) (a : α), (eq.rec_on p₁ (eq.rec_on p₂ a : β) : φ) = eq.rec_on (eq.trans p₂ p₁) a
| α _ _ rfl rfl a := rfl
lemma cast_heq : ∀ {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (a : α), cast h a == a
| α _ rfl a := heq.refl a
/- and -/
notation a /\ b := and a b
notation a ∧ b := and a b
variables {a b c d : Prop}
lemma and.elim (h₁ : a ∧ b) (h₂ : a → b → c) : c :=
and.rec h₂ h₁
lemma and.swap : a ∧ b → b ∧ a :=
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨hb, ha⟩
def and.symm := @and.swap
/- or -/
notation a \/ b := or a b
notation a ∨ b := or a b
namespace or
lemma elim (h₁ : a ∨ b) (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → c) : c :=
or.rec h₂ h₃ h₁
end or
lemma non_contradictory_em (a : Prop) : ¬¬(a ∨ ¬a) :=
assume not_em : ¬(a ∨ ¬a),
have neg_a : ¬a, from
assume pos_a : a, absurd (or.inl pos_a) not_em,
absurd (or.inr neg_a) not_em
def not_not_em := non_contradictory_em
lemma or.swap : a ∨ b → b ∨ a := or.rec or.inr or.inl
def or.symm := @or.swap
/- xor -/
def xor (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬ b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬ a)
/- iff -/
structure iff (a b : Prop) : Prop :=
intro :: (mp : a → b) (mpr : b → a)
notation a <-> b := iff a b
notation a ↔ b := iff a b
lemma iff.elim : ((a → b) → (b → a) → c) → (a ↔ b) → c := iff.rec
attribute [recursor 5] iff.elim
lemma iff.elim_left : (a ↔ b) → a → b := iff.mp
lemma iff.elim_right : (a ↔ b) → b → a := iff.mpr
lemma iff_iff_implies_and_implies (a b : Prop) : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (b → a) :=
iff.intro (λ h, and.intro h.mp h.mpr) (λ h, iff.intro h.left h.right)
@[refl]
lemma iff.refl (a : Prop) : a ↔ a :=
iff.intro (assume h, h) (assume h, h)
lemma iff.rfl {a : Prop} : a ↔ a :=
iff.refl a
@[trans]
lemma iff.trans (h₁ : a ↔ b) (h₂ : b ↔ c) : a ↔ c :=
iff.intro
(assume ha, iff.mp h₂ (iff.mp h₁ ha))
(assume hc, iff.mpr h₁ (iff.mpr h₂ hc))
@[symm]
lemma iff.symm (h : a ↔ b) : b ↔ a :=
iff.intro (iff.elim_right h) (iff.elim_left h)
lemma iff.comm : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b ↔ a) :=
iff.intro iff.symm iff.symm
lemma eq.to_iff {a b : Prop} (h : a = b) : a ↔ b :=
eq.rec_on h iff.rfl
lemma neq_of_not_iff {a b : Prop} : ¬(a ↔ b) → a ≠ b :=
λ h₁ h₂,
have a ↔ b, from eq.subst h₂ (iff.refl a),
absurd this h₁
lemma not_iff_not_of_iff (h₁ : a ↔ b) : ¬a ↔ ¬b :=
iff.intro
(assume (hna : ¬ a) (hb : b), hna (iff.elim_right h₁ hb))
(assume (hnb : ¬ b) (ha : a), hnb (iff.elim_left h₁ ha))
lemma of_iff_true (h : a ↔ true) : a :=
iff.mp (iff.symm h) trivial
lemma not_of_iff_false : (a ↔ false) → ¬a := iff.mp
lemma iff_true_intro (h : a) : a ↔ true :=
iff.intro
(λ hl, trivial)
(λ hr, h)
lemma iff_false_intro (h : ¬a) : a ↔ false :=
iff.intro h (false.rec a)
lemma not_non_contradictory_iff_absurd (a : Prop) : ¬¬¬a ↔ ¬a :=
iff.intro
(λ (hl : ¬¬¬a) (ha : a), hl (non_contradictory_intro ha))
absurd
def not_not_not_iff := not_non_contradictory_iff_absurd
lemma imp_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a → b) ↔ (c → d) :=
iff.intro
(λ hab hc, iff.mp h₂ (hab (iff.mpr h₁ hc)))
(λ hcd ha, iff.mpr h₂ (hcd (iff.mp h₁ ha)))
lemma imp_congr_ctx (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : c → (b ↔ d)) : (a → b) ↔ (c → d) :=
iff.intro
(λ hab hc, have ha : a, from iff.mpr h₁ hc,
have hb : b, from hab ha,
iff.mp (h₂ hc) hb)
(λ hcd ha, have hc : c, from iff.mp h₁ ha,
have hd : d, from hcd hc,
iff.mpr (h₂ hc) hd)
lemma imp_congr_right (h : a → (b ↔ c)) : (a → b) ↔ (a → c) :=
iff.intro
(assume hab ha, iff.elim_left (h ha) (hab ha))
(assume hab ha, iff.elim_right (h ha) (hab ha))
lemma not_not_intro (ha : a) : ¬¬a :=
assume hna : ¬a, hna ha
lemma not_of_not_not_not (h : ¬¬¬a) : ¬a :=
λ ha, absurd (not_not_intro ha) h
@[simp] lemma not_true : (¬ true) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (not_not_intro trivial)
def not_true_iff := not_true
@[simp] lemma not_false_iff : (¬ false) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro not_false
@[congr] lemma not_congr (h : a ↔ b) : ¬a ↔ ¬b :=
iff.intro (λ h₁ h₂, h₁ (iff.mpr h h₂)) (λ h₁ h₂, h₁ (iff.mp h h₂))
@[simp] lemma ne_self_iff_false {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (not (a = a)) ↔ false :=
iff.intro false_of_ne false.elim
@[simp] lemma eq_self_iff_true {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (a = a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro rfl
@[simp] lemma heq_self_iff_true {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (a == a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (heq.refl a)
@[simp] lemma iff_not_self (a : Prop) : (a ↔ ¬a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h,
have h' : ¬a, from (λ ha, (iff.mp h ha) ha),
h' (iff.mpr h h'))
@[simp] lemma not_iff_self (a : Prop) : (¬a ↔ a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h,
have h' : ¬a, from (λ ha, (iff.mpr h ha) ha),
h' (iff.mp h h'))
@[simp] lemma true_iff_false : (true ↔ false) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, iff.mp h trivial)
@[simp] lemma false_iff_true : (false ↔ true) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, iff.mpr h trivial)
lemma false_of_true_iff_false : (true ↔ false) → false :=
assume h, iff.mp h trivial
lemma false_of_true_eq_false : (true = false) → false :=
assume h, h ▸ trivial
lemma true_eq_false_of_false : false → (true = false) :=
false.elim
lemma eq_comm {α : Sort u} {a b : α} : a = b ↔ b = a :=
⟨eq.symm, eq.symm⟩
/- and simp rules -/
lemma and.imp (hac : a → c) (hbd : b → d) : a ∧ b → c ∧ d :=
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨hac ha, hbd hb⟩
def and_implies := @and.imp
@[congr] lemma and_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ∧ b) ↔ (c ∧ d) :=
iff.intro (and.imp (iff.mp h₁) (iff.mp h₂)) (and.imp (iff.mpr h₁) (iff.mpr h₂))
lemma and_congr_right (h : a → (b ↔ c)) : (a ∧ b) ↔ (a ∧ c) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨ha, iff.elim_left (h ha) hb⟩)
(assume ⟨ha, hc⟩, ⟨ha, iff.elim_right (h ha) hc⟩)
lemma and.comm : a ∧ b ↔ b ∧ a :=
iff.intro and.swap and.swap
lemma and_comm (a b : Prop) : a ∧ b ↔ b ∧ a := and.comm
lemma and.assoc : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ a ∧ (b ∧ c) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨⟨ha, hb⟩, hc⟩, ⟨ha, ⟨hb, hc⟩⟩)
(assume ⟨ha, ⟨hb, hc⟩⟩, ⟨⟨ha, hb⟩, hc⟩)
lemma and_assoc (a b : Prop) : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ a ∧ (b ∧ c) := and.assoc
lemma and.left_comm : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ↔ b ∧ (a ∧ c) :=
iff.trans (iff.symm and.assoc) (iff.trans (and_congr and.comm (iff.refl c)) and.assoc)
lemma and_iff_left {a b : Prop} (hb : b) : (a ∧ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (λ ha, ⟨ha, hb⟩)
lemma and_iff_right {a b : Prop} (ha : a) : (a ∧ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro and.right (and.intro ha)
@[simp] lemma and_true (a : Prop) : a ∧ true ↔ a :=
and_iff_left trivial
@[simp] lemma true_and (a : Prop) : true ∧ a ↔ a :=
and_iff_right trivial
@[simp] lemma and_false (a : Prop) : a ∧ false ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro and.right
@[simp] lemma false_and (a : Prop) : false ∧ a ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro and.left
@[simp] lemma not_and_self (a : Prop) : (¬a ∧ a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, and.elim h (λ h₁ h₂, absurd h₂ h₁))
@[simp] lemma and_not_self (a : Prop) : (a ∧ ¬a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, absurd h₁ h₂)
@[simp] lemma and_self (a : Prop) : a ∧ a ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (assume h, ⟨h, h⟩)
/- or simp rules -/
lemma or.imp (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → d) : a ∨ b → c ∨ d :=
or.rec (λ h, or.inl (h₂ h)) (λ h, or.inr (h₃ h))
lemma or.imp_left (h : a → b) : a ∨ c → b ∨ c :=
or.imp h id
lemma or.imp_right (h : a → b) : c ∨ a → c ∨ b :=
or.imp id h
@[congr] lemma or_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ∨ b) ↔ (c ∨ d) :=
iff.intro (or.imp (iff.mp h₁) (iff.mp h₂)) (or.imp (iff.mpr h₁) (iff.mpr h₂))
lemma or.comm : a ∨ b ↔ b ∨ a := iff.intro or.swap or.swap
lemma or_comm (a b : Prop) : a ∨ b ↔ b ∨ a := or.comm
lemma or.assoc : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ a ∨ (b ∨ c) :=
iff.intro
(or.rec (or.imp_right or.inl) (λ h, or.inr (or.inr h)))
(or.rec (λ h, or.inl (or.inl h)) (or.imp_left or.inr))
lemma or_assoc (a b : Prop) : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ a ∨ (b ∨ c) :=
or.assoc
lemma or.left_comm : a ∨ (b ∨ c) ↔ b ∨ (a ∨ c) :=
iff.trans (iff.symm or.assoc) (iff.trans (or_congr or.comm (iff.refl c)) or.assoc)
theorem or_iff_right_of_imp (ha : a → b) : (a ∨ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro (or.rec ha id) or.inr
theorem or_iff_left_of_imp (hb : b → a) : (a ∨ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro (or.rec id hb) or.inl
@[simp] lemma or_true (a : Prop) : a ∨ true ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (or.inr trivial)
@[simp] lemma true_or (a : Prop) : true ∨ a ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (or.inl trivial)
@[simp] lemma or_false (a : Prop) : a ∨ false ↔ a :=
iff.intro (or.rec id false.elim) or.inl
@[simp] lemma false_or (a : Prop) : false ∨ a ↔ a :=
iff.trans or.comm (or_false a)
@[simp] lemma or_self (a : Prop) : a ∨ a ↔ a :=
iff.intro (or.rec id id) or.inl
lemma not_or {a b : Prop} : ¬ a → ¬ b → ¬ (a ∨ b)
| hna hnb (or.inl ha) := absurd ha hna
| hna hnb (or.inr hb) := absurd hb hnb
/- or resolution rulse -/
def or.resolve_left {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ b) (na : ¬ a) : b :=
or.elim h (λ ha, absurd ha na) id
def or.neg_resolve_left {a b : Prop} (h : ¬ a ∨ b) (ha : a) : b :=
or.elim h (λ na, absurd ha na) id
def or.resolve_right {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ b) (nb : ¬ b) : a :=
or.elim h id (λ hb, absurd hb nb)
def or.neg_resolve_right {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ ¬ b) (hb : b) : a :=
or.elim h id (λ nb, absurd hb nb)
/- iff simp rules -/
@[simp] lemma iff_true (a : Prop) : (a ↔ true) ↔ a :=
iff.intro (assume h, iff.mpr h trivial) iff_true_intro
@[simp] lemma true_iff (a : Prop) : (true ↔ a) ↔ a :=
iff.trans iff.comm (iff_true a)
@[simp] lemma iff_false (a : Prop) : (a ↔ false) ↔ ¬ a :=
iff.intro iff.mp iff_false_intro
@[simp] lemma false_iff (a : Prop) : (false ↔ a) ↔ ¬ a :=
iff.trans iff.comm (iff_false a)
@[simp] lemma iff_self (a : Prop) : (a ↔ a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro iff.rfl
@[congr] lemma iff_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ↔ b) ↔ (c ↔ d) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies a b).trans
((and_congr (imp_congr h₁ h₂) (imp_congr h₂ h₁)).trans
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies c d).symm)
/- implies simp rule -/
@[simp] lemma implies_true_iff (α : Sort u) : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ ha h, trivial)
@[simp] lemma false_implies_iff (a : Prop) : (false → a) ↔ true :=
iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ ha h, false.elim h)
@[simp] theorem true_implies_iff (α : Prop) : (true → α) ↔ α :=
iff.intro (λ h, h trivial) (λ h h', h)
/- exists -/
inductive Exists {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) : Prop
| intro (w : α) (h : p w) : Exists
attribute [intro] Exists.intro
@[pattern]
def exists.intro := @Exists.intro
notation `exists` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, Exists P) := r
notation `∃` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, Exists P) := r
lemma exists.elim {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
(h₁ : ∃ x, p x) (h₂ : ∀ (a : α), p a → b) : b :=
Exists.rec h₂ h₁
/- exists unique -/
def exists_unique {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) :=
∃ x, p x ∧ ∀ y, p y → y = x
notation `∃!` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, exists_unique P) := r
@[intro]
lemma exists_unique.intro {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} (w : α) (h₁ : p w) (h₂ : ∀ y, p y → y = w) :
∃! x, p x :=
exists.intro w ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
attribute [recursor 4]
lemma exists_unique.elim {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
(h₂ : ∃! x, p x) (h₁ : ∀ x, p x → (∀ y, p y → y = x) → b) : b :=
exists.elim h₂ (λ w hw, h₁ w (and.left hw) (and.right hw))
lemma exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop}
(hex : ∃ x, p x) (hunique : ∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ → p y₂ → y₁ = y₂) : ∃! x, p x :=
exists.elim hex (λ x px, exists_unique.intro x px (assume y, assume : p y, hunique y x this px))
lemma exists_of_exists_unique {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃! x, p x) : ∃ x, p x :=
exists.elim h (λ x hx, ⟨x, and.left hx⟩)
lemma unique_of_exists_unique {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∃! x, p x) {y₁ y₂ : α} (py₁ : p y₁) (py₂ : p y₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
exists_unique.elim h
(assume x, assume : p x,
assume unique : ∀ y, p y → y = x,
show y₁ = y₂, from eq.trans (unique _ py₁) (eq.symm (unique _ py₂)))
/- exists, forall, exists unique congruences -/
@[congr] lemma forall_congr {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a ↔ q a)) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, q a :=
iff.intro (λ p a, iff.mp (h a) (p a)) (λ q a, iff.mpr (h a) (q a))
lemma exists_imp_exists {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a → q a)) (p : ∃ a, p a) : ∃ a, q a :=
exists.elim p (λ a hp, ⟨a, h a hp⟩)
@[congr] lemma exists_congr {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a ↔ q a)) : (Exists p) ↔ ∃ a, q a :=
iff.intro
(exists_imp_exists (λ a, iff.mp (h a)))
(exists_imp_exists (λ a, iff.mpr (h a)))
@[congr] lemma exists_unique_congr {α : Sort u} {p₁ p₂ : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p₁ x ↔ p₂ x) : (exists_unique p₁) ↔ (∃! x, p₂ x) := --
exists_congr (λ x, and_congr (h x) (forall_congr (λ y, imp_congr (h y) iff.rfl)))
lemma forall_not_of_not_exists {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : ¬(∃ x, p x) → (∀ x, ¬p x) :=
λ hne x hp, hne ⟨x, hp⟩
/- decidable -/
def decidable.to_bool (p : Prop) [h : decidable p] : bool :=
decidable.cases_on h (λ h₁, bool.ff) (λ h₂, bool.tt)
export decidable (is_true is_false to_bool)
@[simp] lemma to_bool_true_eq_tt (h : decidable true) : @to_bool true h = tt :=
decidable.cases_on h (λ h, false.elim (iff.mp not_true h)) (λ _, rfl)
@[simp] lemma to_bool_false_eq_ff (h : decidable false) : @to_bool false h = ff :=
decidable.cases_on h (λ h, rfl) (λ h, false.elim h)
instance decidable.true : decidable true :=
is_true trivial
instance decidable.false : decidable false :=
is_false not_false
-- We use "dependent" if-then-else to be able to communicate the if-then-else condition
-- to the branches
@[inline] def dite (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} : (c → α) → (¬ c → α) → α :=
λ t e, decidable.rec_on h e t
/- if-then-else -/
@[inline] def ite (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t e : α) : α :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ hnc, e) (λ hc, t)
namespace decidable
variables {p q : Prop}
def rec_on_true [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u} (h₃ : p) (h₄ : h₁ h₃)
: decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁ :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ h, false.rec _ (h h₃)) (λ h, h₄)
def rec_on_false [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u} (h₃ : ¬p) (h₄ : h₂ h₃)
: decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁ :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ h, h₄) (λ h, false.rec _ (h₃ h))
def by_cases {q : Sort u} [φ : decidable p] : (p → q) → (¬p → q) → q := dite _
/-- Law of Excluded Middle. -/
lemma em (p : Prop) [decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p := by_cases or.inl or.inr
lemma by_contradiction [decidable p] (h : ¬p → false) : p :=
if h₁ : p then h₁ else false.rec _ (h h₁)
lemma of_not_not [decidable p] : ¬ ¬ p → p :=
λ hnn, by_contradiction (λ hn, absurd hn hnn)
lemma not_not_iff (p) [decidable p] : (¬ ¬ p) ↔ p :=
iff.intro of_not_not not_not_intro
lemma not_and_iff_or_not (p q : Prop) [d₁ : decidable p] [d₂ : decidable q] : ¬ (p ∧ q) ↔ ¬ p ∨ ¬ q :=
iff.intro
(λ h, match d₁ with
| is_true h₁ :=
match d₂ with
| is_true h₂ := absurd (and.intro h₁ h₂) h
| is_false h₂ := or.inr h₂
end
| is_false h₁ := or.inl h₁
end)
(λ h ⟨hp, hq⟩, or.elim h (λ h, h hp) (λ h, h hq))
lemma not_or_iff_and_not (p q) [d₁ : decidable p] [d₂ : decidable q] : ¬ (p ∨ q) ↔ ¬ p ∧ ¬ q :=
iff.intro
(λ h, match d₁ with
| is_true h₁ := false.elim $ h (or.inl h₁)
| is_false h₁ :=
match d₂ with
| is_true h₂ := false.elim $ h (or.inr h₂)
| is_false h₂ := ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
end
end)
(λ ⟨np, nq⟩ h, or.elim h np nq)
end decidable
section
variables {p q : Prop}
def decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (hp : decidable p) (h : p ↔ q) : decidable q :=
if hp : p then is_true (iff.mp h hp)
else is_false (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h) hp)
def decidable_of_decidable_of_eq (hp : decidable p) (h : p = q) : decidable q :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff hp h.to_iff
protected def or.by_cases [decidable p] [decidable q] {α : Sort u}
(h : p ∨ q) (h₁ : p → α) (h₂ : q → α) : α :=
if hp : p then h₁ hp else
if hq : q then h₂ hq else
false.rec _ (or.elim h hp hq)
end
section
variables {p q : Prop}
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ∧ q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_true ⟨hp, hq⟩
else is_false (assume h : p ∧ q, hq (and.right h))
else is_false (assume h : p ∧ q, hp (and.left h))
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ∨ q) :=
if hp : p then is_true (or.inl hp) else
if hq : q then is_true (or.inr hq) else
is_false (or.rec hp hq)
instance [decidable p] : decidable (¬p) :=
if hp : p then is_false (absurd hp) else is_true hp
instance implies.decidable [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p → q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_true (assume h, hq)
else is_false (assume h : p → q, absurd (h hp) hq)
else is_true (assume h, absurd h hp)
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ↔ q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_true ⟨λ_, hq, λ_, hp⟩
else is_false $ λh, hq (h.1 hp)
else
if hq : q then is_false $ λh, hp (h.2 hq)
else is_true $ ⟨λh, absurd h hp, λh, absurd h hq⟩
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (xor p q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_false (or.rec (λ ⟨_, h⟩, h hq : ¬(p ∧ ¬ q)) (λ ⟨_, h⟩, h hp : ¬(q ∧ ¬ p)))
else is_true $ or.inl ⟨hp, hq⟩
else
if hq : q then is_true $ or.inr ⟨hq, hp⟩
else is_false (or.rec (λ ⟨h, _⟩, hp h : ¬(p ∧ ¬ q)) (λ ⟨h, _⟩, hq h : ¬(q ∧ ¬ p)))
instance exists_prop_decidable {p} (P : p → Prop)
[Dp : decidable p] [DP : ∀ h, decidable (P h)] : decidable (∃ h, P h) :=
if h : p then decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (DP h)
⟨λ h2, ⟨h, h2⟩, λ⟨h', h2⟩, h2⟩ else is_false (mt (λ⟨h, _⟩, h) h)
instance forall_prop_decidable {p} (P : p → Prop)
[Dp : decidable p] [DP : ∀ h, decidable (P h)] : decidable (∀ h, P h) :=
if h : p then decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (DP h)
⟨λ h2 _, h2, λal, al h⟩ else is_true (λ h2, absurd h2 h)
end
instance {α : Sort u} [decidable_eq α] (a b : α) : decidable (a ≠ b) :=
implies.decidable
lemma bool.ff_ne_tt : ff = tt → false
.
def is_dec_eq {α : Sort u} (p : α → α → bool) : Prop := ∀ ⦃x y : α⦄, p x y = tt → x = y
def is_dec_refl {α : Sort u} (p : α → α → bool) : Prop := ∀ x, p x x = tt
open decidable
instance : decidable_eq bool
| ff ff := is_true rfl
| ff tt := is_false bool.ff_ne_tt
| tt ff := is_false (ne.symm bool.ff_ne_tt)
| tt tt := is_true rfl
def decidable_eq_of_bool_pred {α : Sort u} {p : α → α → bool} (h₁ : is_dec_eq p) (h₂ : is_dec_refl p) : decidable_eq α :=
assume x y : α,
if hp : p x y = tt then is_true (h₁ hp)
else is_false (assume hxy : x = y, absurd (h₂ y) (@eq.rec_on _ _ (λ z, ¬p z y = tt) _ hxy hp))
lemma decidable_eq_inl_refl {α : Sort u} [h : decidable_eq α] (a : α) : h a a = is_true (eq.refl a) :=
match (h a a) with
| (is_true e) := rfl
| (is_false n) := absurd rfl n
end
lemma decidable_eq_inr_neg {α : Sort u} [h : decidable_eq α] {a b : α} : Π n : a ≠ b, h a b = is_false n :=
assume n,
match (h a b) with
| (is_true e) := absurd e n
| (is_false n₁) := proof_irrel n n₁ ▸ eq.refl (is_false n)
end
/- inhabited -/
class inhabited (α : Sort u) :=
(default : α)
export inhabited (default)
@[inline, irreducible] def arbitrary (α : Sort u) [inhabited α] : α :=
default α
instance prop.inhabited : inhabited Prop :=
⟨true⟩
instance pi.inhabited (α : Sort u) {β : α → Sort v} [Π x, inhabited (β x)] : inhabited (Π x, β x) :=
⟨λ a, default (β a)⟩
instance : inhabited bool := ⟨ff⟩
instance : inhabited true := ⟨trivial⟩
class inductive nonempty (α : Sort u) : Prop
| intro (val : α) : nonempty
protected def nonempty.elim {α : Sort u} {p : Prop} (h₁ : nonempty α) (h₂ : α → p) : p :=
nonempty.rec h₂ h₁
instance nonempty_of_inhabited {α : Sort u} [inhabited α] : nonempty α :=
⟨default α⟩
lemma nonempty_of_exists {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) → nonempty α
| ⟨w, h⟩ := ⟨w⟩
/- subsingleton -/
class inductive subsingleton (α : Sort u) : Prop
| intro (h : ∀ a b : α, a = b) : subsingleton
protected def subsingleton.elim {α : Sort u} [h : subsingleton α] : ∀ (a b : α), a = b :=
subsingleton.rec (λ p, p) h
protected def subsingleton.helim {α β : Sort u} [h : subsingleton α] (h : α = β) : ∀ (a : α) (b : β), a == b :=
eq.rec_on h (λ a b : α, heq_of_eq (subsingleton.elim a b))
instance subsingleton_prop (p : Prop) : subsingleton p :=
⟨λ a b, proof_irrel a b⟩
instance (p : Prop) : subsingleton (decidable p) :=
subsingleton.intro (λ d₁,
match d₁ with
| (is_true t₁) := (λ d₂,
match d₂ with
| (is_true t₂) := eq.rec_on (proof_irrel t₁ t₂) rfl
| (is_false f₂) := absurd t₁ f₂
end)
| (is_false f₁) := (λ d₂,
match d₂ with
| (is_true t₂) := absurd t₂ f₁
| (is_false f₂) := eq.rec_on (proof_irrel f₁ f₂) rfl
end)
end)
protected lemma rec_subsingleton {p : Prop} [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u}
[h₃ : Π (h : p), subsingleton (h₁ h)] [h₄ : Π (h : ¬p), subsingleton (h₂ h)]
: subsingleton (decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁) :=
match h with
| (is_true h) := h₃ h
| (is_false h) := h₄ h
end
lemma if_pos {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hc : c) {α : Sort u} {t e : α} : (ite c t e) = t :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := absurd hc hnc
end
lemma if_neg {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hnc : ¬c) {α : Sort u} {t e : α} : (ite c t e) = e :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := absurd hc hnc
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
@[simp]
lemma if_t_t (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t : α) : (ite c t t) = t :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
lemma implies_of_if_pos {c t e : Prop} [decidable c] (h : ite c t e) : c → t :=
assume hc, eq.rec_on (if_pos hc : ite c t e = t) h
lemma implies_of_if_neg {c t e : Prop} [decidable c] (h : ite c t e) : ¬c → e :=
assume hnc, eq.rec_on (if_neg hnc : ite c t e = e) h
lemma if_ctx_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → x = u) (h_e : ¬c → y = v) :
ite b x y = ite c u v :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
@[congr]
lemma if_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x = u) (h_e : y = v) :
ite b x y = ite c u v :=
@if_ctx_congr α b c dec_b dec_c x y u v h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
@[simp]
lemma if_true {α : Sort u} {h : decidable true} (t e : α) : (@ite true h α t e) = t :=
if_pos trivial
@[simp]
lemma if_false {α : Sort u} {h : decidable false} (t e : α) : (@ite false h α t e) = e :=
if_neg not_false
lemma if_ctx_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → (x ↔ u)) (h_e : ¬c → (y ↔ v)) :
ite b x y ↔ ite c u v :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
@[congr]
lemma if_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x ↔ u) (h_e : y ↔ v) :
ite b x y ↔ ite c u v :=
if_ctx_congr_prop h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
lemma if_ctx_simp_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → (x ↔ u)) (h_e : ¬c → (y ↔ v)) :
ite b x y ↔ (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) Prop u v) :=
@if_ctx_congr_prop b c x y u v dec_b (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) h_c h_t h_e
@[congr]
lemma if_simp_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x ↔ u) (h_e : y ↔ v) :
ite b x y ↔ (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) Prop u v) :=
@if_ctx_simp_congr_prop b c x y u v dec_b h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
@[simp] lemma dif_pos {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hc : c) {α : Sort u} {t : c → α} {e : ¬ c → α} : dite c t e = t hc :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := absurd hc hnc
end
@[simp] lemma dif_neg {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hnc : ¬c) {α : Sort u} {t : c → α} {e : ¬ c → α} : dite c t e = e hnc :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := absurd hc hnc
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
lemma dif_ctx_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x : b → α} {u : c → α} {y : ¬b → α} {v : ¬c → α}
(h_c : b ↔ c)
(h_t : ∀ (h : c), x (iff.mpr h_c h) = u h)
(h_e : ∀ (h : ¬c), y (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h) = v h) :
(@dite b dec_b α x y) = (@dite c dec_c α u v) :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
lemma dif_ctx_simp_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
{x : b → α} {u : c → α} {y : ¬b → α} {v : ¬c → α}
(h_c : b ↔ c)
(h_t : ∀ (h : c), x (iff.mpr h_c h) = u h)
(h_e : ∀ (h : ¬c), y (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h) = v h) :
(@dite b dec_b α x y) = (@dite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) α u v) :=
@dif_ctx_congr α b c dec_b (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) x u y v h_c h_t h_e
-- Remark: dite and ite are "defally equal" when we ignore the proofs.
lemma dif_eq_if (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t : α) (e : α) : dite c (λ h, t) (λ h, e) = ite c t e :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
instance {c t e : Prop} [d_c : decidable c] [d_t : decidable t] [d_e : decidable e] : decidable (if c then t else e) :=
match d_c with
| (is_true hc) := d_t
| (is_false hc) := d_e
end
instance {c : Prop} {t : c → Prop} {e : ¬c → Prop} [d_c : decidable c] [d_t : ∀ h, decidable (t h)] [d_e : ∀ h, decidable (e h)] : decidable (if h : c then t h else e h) :=
match d_c with
| (is_true hc) := d_t hc
| (is_false hc) := d_e hc
end
def as_true (c : Prop) [decidable c] : Prop :=
if c then true else false
def as_false (c : Prop) [decidable c] : Prop :=
if c then false else true
def of_as_true {c : Prop} [h₁ : decidable c] (h₂ : as_true c) : c :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| (is_true h_c), h₂ := h_c
| (is_false h_c), h₂ := false.elim h₂
end
/-- Universe lifting operation -/
structure {r s} ulift (α : Type s) : Type (max s r) :=
up :: (down : α)
namespace ulift
/- Bijection between α and ulift.{v} α -/
lemma up_down {α : Type u} : ∀ (b : ulift.{v} α), up (down b) = b
| (up a) := rfl
lemma down_up {α : Type u} (a : α) : down (up.{v} a) = a := rfl
end ulift
/-- Universe lifting operation from Sort to Type -/
structure plift (α : Sort u) : Type u :=
up :: (down : α)
namespace plift
/- Bijection between α and plift α -/
lemma up_down {α : Sort u} : ∀ (b : plift α), up (down b) = b
| (up a) := rfl
lemma down_up {α : Sort u} (a : α) : down (up a) = a := rfl
end plift
/- Equalities for rewriting let-expressions -/
lemma let_value_eq {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : α → β) :
a₁ = a₂ → (let x : α := a₁ in b x) = (let x : α := a₂ in b x) :=
λ h, eq.rec_on h rfl
lemma let_value_heq {α : Sort v} {β : α → Sort u} {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : Π x : α, β x) :
a₁ = a₂ → (let x : α := a₁ in b x) == (let x : α := a₂ in b x) :=
λ h, eq.rec_on h (heq.refl (b a₁))
lemma let_body_eq {α : Sort v} {β : α → Sort u} (a : α) {b₁ b₂ : Π x : α, β x} :
(∀ x, b₁ x = b₂ x) → (let x : α := a in b₁ x) = (let x : α := a in b₂ x) :=
λ h, h a
lemma let_eq {α : Sort v} {β : Sort u} {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : α → β} :
a₁ = a₂ → (∀ x, b₁ x = b₂ x) → (let x : α := a₁ in b₁ x) = (let x : α := a₂ in b₂ x) :=
λ h₁ h₂, eq.rec_on h₁ (h₂ a₁)
section relation
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (r : β → β → Prop)
local infix `≺`:50 := r
def reflexive := ∀ x, x ≺ x
def symmetric := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ x
def transitive := ∀ ⦃x y z⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ z → x ≺ z
def equivalence := reflexive r ∧ symmetric r ∧ transitive r
def total := ∀ x y, x ≺ y ∨ y ≺ x
def mk_equivalence (rfl : reflexive r) (symm : symmetric r) (trans : transitive r) : equivalence r :=
⟨rfl, symm, trans⟩
def irreflexive := ∀ x, ¬ x ≺ x
def anti_symmetric := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ x → x = y
def empty_relation := λ a₁ a₂ : α, false
def subrelation (q r : β → β → Prop) := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, q x y → r x y
def inv_image (f : α → β) : α → α → Prop :=
λ a₁ a₂, f a₁ ≺ f a₂
lemma inv_image.trans (f : α → β) (h : transitive r) : transitive (inv_image r f) :=
λ (a₁ a₂ a₃ : α) (h₁ : inv_image r f a₁ a₂) (h₂ : inv_image r f a₂ a₃), h h₁ h₂
lemma inv_image.irreflexive (f : α → β) (h : irreflexive r) : irreflexive (inv_image r f) :=
λ (a : α) (h₁ : inv_image r f a a), h (f a) h₁
inductive tc {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : α → α → Prop
| base : ∀ a b, r a b → tc a b
| trans : ∀ a b c, tc a b → tc b c → tc a c
end relation
section binary
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
variable f : α → α → α
variable inv : α → α
variable one : α
local notation a * b := f a b
local notation a ⁻¹ := inv a
variable g : α → α → α
local notation a + b := g a b
def commutative := ∀ a b, a * b = b * a
def associative := ∀ a b c, (a * b) * c = a * (b * c)
def left_identity := ∀ a, one * a = a
def right_identity := ∀ a, a * one = a
def right_inverse := ∀ a, a * a⁻¹ = one
def left_cancelative := ∀ a b c, a * b = a * c → b = c
def right_cancelative := ∀ a b c, a * b = c * b → a = c
def left_distributive := ∀ a b c, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
def right_distributive := ∀ a b c, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
def right_commutative (h : β → α → β) := ∀ b a₁ a₂, h (h b a₁) a₂ = h (h b a₂) a₁
def left_commutative (h : α → β → β) := ∀ a₁ a₂ b, h a₁ (h a₂ b) = h a₂ (h a₁ b)
lemma left_comm : commutative f → associative f → left_commutative f :=
assume hcomm hassoc, assume a b c, calc
a*(b*c) = (a*b)*c : eq.symm (hassoc a b c)
... = (b*a)*c : hcomm a b ▸ rfl
... = b*(a*c) : hassoc b a c
lemma right_comm : commutative f → associative f → right_commutative f :=
assume hcomm hassoc, assume a b c, calc
(a*b)*c = a*(b*c) : hassoc a b c
... = a*(c*b) : hcomm b c ▸ rfl
... = (a*c)*b : eq.symm (hassoc a c b)
end binary
|
d22571b9af18bfa92fe4e96904b12f62ab8ff703 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/analysis/normed_space/inner_product.lean | 7a484a01db282bfdf77148e11db5e3af68e69879 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 128,827 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import linear_algebra.bilinear_form
import linear_algebra.sesquilinear_form
import topology.metric_space.pi_Lp
import data.complex.is_R_or_C
import analysis.special_functions.sqrt
/-!
# Inner Product Space
This file defines inner product spaces and proves its basic properties.
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an inner product. It generalizes the notion of
dot product in `ℝ^n` and provides the means of defining the length of a vector and the angle between
two vectors. In particular vectors `x` and `y` are orthogonal if their inner product equals zero.
We define both the real and complex cases at the same time using the `is_R_or_C` typeclass.
## Main results
- We define the class `inner_product_space 𝕜 E` extending `normed_space 𝕜 E` with a number of basic
properties, most notably the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Here `𝕜` is understood to be either `ℝ`
or `ℂ`, through the `is_R_or_C` typeclass.
- We show that if `f i` is an inner product space for each `i`, then so is `Π i, f i`
- We define `euclidean_space 𝕜 n` to be `n → 𝕜` for any `fintype n`, and show that
this an inner product space.
- Existence of orthogonal projection onto nonempty complete subspace:
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a unique `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
The point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
- We define `orthonormal`, a predicate on a function `v : ι → E`. We prove the existence of a
maximal orthonormal set, `exists_maximal_orthonormal`, and also prove that a maximal orthonormal
set is a basis (`maximal_orthonormal_iff_basis_of_finite_dimensional`), if `E` is finite-
dimensional, or in general (`maximal_orthonormal_iff_dense_span`) a set whose span is dense
(i.e., a Hilbert basis, although we do not make that definition).
## Notation
We globally denote the real and complex inner products by `⟪·, ·⟫_ℝ` and `⟪·, ·⟫_ℂ` respectively.
We also provide two notation namespaces: `real_inner_product_space`, `complex_inner_product_space`,
which respectively introduce the plain notation `⟪·, ·⟫` for the the real and complex inner product.
The orthogonal complement of a submodule `K` is denoted by `Kᗮ`.
## Implementation notes
We choose the convention that inner products are conjugate linear in the first argument and linear
in the second.
## TODO
- Fix the section on the existence of minimizers and orthogonal projections to make sure that it
also applies in the complex case.
## Tags
inner product space, norm
## References
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable theory
open is_R_or_C real filter
open_locale big_operators classical topological_space
variables {𝕜 E F : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜]
/-- Syntactic typeclass for types endowed with an inner product -/
class has_inner (𝕜 E : Type*) := (inner : E → E → 𝕜)
export has_inner (inner)
notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫_ℝ` := @inner ℝ _ _ x y
notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫_ℂ` := @inner ℂ _ _ x y
section notations
localized "notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner ℝ _ _ x y" in real_inner_product_space
localized "notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner ℂ _ _ x y" in complex_inner_product_space
end notations
/--
An inner product space is a vector space with an additional operation called inner product.
The norm could be derived from the inner product, instead we require the existence of a norm and
the fact that `∥x∥^2 = re ⟪x, x⟫` to be able to put instances on `𝕂` or product
spaces.
To construct a norm from an inner product, see `inner_product_space.of_core`.
-/
class inner_product_space (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [is_R_or_C 𝕜]
extends normed_group E, normed_space 𝕜 E, has_inner 𝕜 E :=
(norm_sq_eq_inner : ∀ (x : E), ∥x∥^2 = re (inner x x))
(conj_sym : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y)
(add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z)
(smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = (conj r) * inner x y)
attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] inner_product_space.to_normed_group
-- note [is_R_or_C instance]
/-!
### Constructing a normed space structure from an inner product
In the definition of an inner product space, we require the existence of a norm, which is equal
(but maybe not defeq) to the square root of the scalar product. This makes it possible to put
an inner product space structure on spaces with a preexisting norm (for instance `ℝ`), with good
properties. However, sometimes, one would like to define the norm starting only from a well-behaved
scalar product. This is what we implement in this paragraph, starting from a structure
`inner_product_space.core` stating that we have a nice scalar product.
Our goal here is not to develop a whole theory with all the supporting API, as this will be done
below for `inner_product_space`. Instead, we implement the bare minimum to go as directly as
possible to the construction of the norm and the proof of the triangular inequality.
Warning: Do not use this `core` structure if the space you are interested in already has a norm
instance defined on it, otherwise this will create a second non-defeq norm instance!
-/
/-- A structure requiring that a scalar product is positive definite and symmetric, from which one
can construct an `inner_product_space` instance in `inner_product_space.of_core`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure inner_product_space.core
(𝕜 : Type*) (F : Type*)
[is_R_or_C 𝕜] [add_comm_group F] [module 𝕜 F] :=
(inner : F → F → 𝕜)
(conj_sym : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y)
(nonneg_re : ∀ x, 0 ≤ re (inner x x))
(definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0)
(add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z)
(smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = (conj r) * inner x y)
/- We set `inner_product_space.core` to be a class as we will use it as such in the construction
of the normed space structure that it produces. However, all the instances we will use will be
local to this proof. -/
attribute [class] inner_product_space.core
namespace inner_product_space.of_core
variables [add_comm_group F] [module 𝕜 F] [c : inner_product_space.core 𝕜 F]
include c
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner 𝕜 F _ x y
local notation `norm_sqK` := @is_R_or_C.norm_sq 𝕜 _
local notation `reK` := @is_R_or_C.re 𝕜 _
local notation `absK` := @is_R_or_C.abs 𝕜 _
local notation `ext_iff` := @is_R_or_C.ext_iff 𝕜 _
local postfix `†`:90 := @is_R_or_C.conj 𝕜 _
/-- Inner product defined by the `inner_product_space.core` structure. -/
def to_has_inner : has_inner 𝕜 F := { inner := c.inner }
local attribute [instance] to_has_inner
/-- The norm squared function for `inner_product_space.core` structure. -/
def norm_sq (x : F) := reK ⟪x, x⟫
local notation `norm_sqF` := @norm_sq 𝕜 F _ _ _ _
lemma inner_conj_sym (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ := c.conj_sym x y
lemma inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ := c.nonneg_re _
lemma inner_self_nonneg_im {x : F} : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [← @of_real_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp [inner_conj_sym]
lemma inner_self_im_zero {x : F} : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 :=
inner_self_nonneg_im
lemma inner_add_left {x y z : F} : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
c.add_left _ _ _
lemma inner_add_right {x y z : F} : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_add_left, ring_hom.map_add]; simp only [inner_conj_sym]
lemma inner_norm_sq_eq_inner_self (x : F) : (norm_sqF x : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
begin
rw ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp only [of_real_re]; refl, by simp only [inner_self_nonneg_im, of_real_im]⟩
end
lemma inner_re_symm {x y : F} : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_re]
lemma inner_im_symm {x y : F} : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_im]
lemma inner_smul_left {x y : F} {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.smul_left _ _ _
lemma inner_smul_right {x y : F} {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_smul_left]; simp only [conj_conj, inner_conj_sym, ring_hom.map_mul]
lemma inner_zero_left {x : F} : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [←zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : F), inner_smul_left]; simp only [zero_mul, ring_hom.map_zero]
lemma inner_zero_right {x : F} : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_zero_left]; simp only [ring_hom.map_zero]
lemma inner_self_eq_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
iff.intro (c.definite _) (by { rintro rfl, exact inner_zero_left })
lemma inner_self_re_to_K {x : F} : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by norm_num [ext_iff, inner_self_nonneg_im]
lemma inner_abs_conj_sym {x y : F} : abs ⟪x, y⟫ = abs ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, abs_conj]
lemma inner_neg_left {x y : F} : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ :=
by { rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left], simp }
lemma inner_neg_right {x y : F} : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_neg_left]; simp only [ring_hom.map_neg, inner_conj_sym]
lemma inner_sub_left {x y z : F} : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left, inner_neg_left] }
lemma inner_sub_right {x y z : F} : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right, inner_neg_right] }
lemma inner_mul_conj_re_abs {x y : F} : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = abs (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) :=
by { rw[←inner_conj_sym, mul_comm], exact re_eq_abs_of_mul_conj (inner y x), }
/-- Expand `inner (x + y) (x + y)` -/
lemma inner_add_add_self {x y : F} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/- Expand `inner (x - y) (x - y)` -/
lemma inner_sub_sub_self {x y : F} : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/--
Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. This proof follows "Proof 2" on Wikipedia.
We need this for the `core` structure to prove the triangle inequality below when
showing the core is a normed group.
-/
lemma inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
begin
by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ rw [hy], simp only [is_R_or_C.abs_zero, inner_zero_left, mul_zero, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] },
{ change y ≠ 0 at hy,
have hy' : ⟪y, y⟫ ≠ 0 := λ h, by rw [inner_self_eq_zero] at h; exact hy h,
set T := ⟪y, x⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫ with hT,
have h₁ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = re ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_re_symm,
have h₂ : im ⟪y, x⟫ = -im ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_im_symm,
have h₃ : ⟪y, x⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ / (⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫) = ⟪y, x⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫,
{ rw [mul_div_assoc],
have : ⟪y, y⟫ / (⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫) = 1 / ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_self hy', one_mul],
rw [this, div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, ←div_eq_mul_inv] },
have h₄ : ⟪y, y⟫ = re ⟪y, y⟫ := by simp only [inner_self_re_to_K],
have h₅ : re ⟪y, y⟫ > 0,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne inner_self_nonneg _,
intro H,
apply hy',
rw ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp [H],by simp [inner_self_nonneg_im]⟩ },
have h₆ : re ⟪y, y⟫ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt h₅,
have hmain := calc
0 ≤ re ⟪x - T • y, x - T • y⟫
: inner_self_nonneg
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re ⟪T • y, x⟫ - re ⟪x, T • y⟫ + re ⟪T • y, T • y⟫
: by simp [inner_sub_sub_self, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, h₁, h₂]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (T† * ⟪y, x⟫) - re (T * ⟪x, y⟫) + re (T * T† * ⟪y, y⟫)
: by simp [inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, mul_assoc]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫)
: by field_simp [-mul_re, inner_conj_sym, hT, conj_div, h₁, h₃]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫)
: by rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div_comm, ←mul_div_assoc]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫)
: by conv_lhs { rw [h₄] }
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw [div_re_of_real]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - abs (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw [inner_mul_conj_re_abs]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw is_R_or_C.abs_mul,
have hmain' : abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ := by linarith,
have := (mul_le_mul_right h₅).mpr hmain',
rwa [div_mul_cancel (abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫) h₆] at this }
end
/-- Norm constructed from a `inner_product_space.core` structure, defined to be the square root
of the scalar product. -/
def to_has_norm : has_norm F :=
{ norm := λ x, sqrt (re ⟪x, x⟫) }
local attribute [instance] to_has_norm
lemma norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : F) : ∥x∥ = sqrt (re ⟪x, x⟫) := rfl
lemma inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ :=
by rw[norm_eq_sqrt_inner, ←sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
lemma sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm {x : F} : sqrt (norm_sqF x) = ∥x∥ := rfl
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
lemma abs_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : abs ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (mul_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _))
begin
have H : ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ * (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = re ⟪y, y⟫ * re ⟪x, x⟫,
{ simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_sq], ring, },
rw H,
conv
begin
to_lhs, congr, rw[inner_abs_conj_sym],
end,
exact inner_mul_inner_self_le y x,
end
/-- Normed group structure constructed from an `inner_product_space.core` structure -/
def to_normed_group : normed_group F :=
normed_group.of_core F
{ norm_eq_zero_iff := assume x,
begin
split,
{ intro H,
change sqrt (re ⟪x, x⟫) = 0 at H,
rw [sqrt_eq_zero inner_self_nonneg] at H,
apply (inner_self_eq_zero : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0).mp,
rw ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp [H], by simp [inner_self_im_zero]⟩ },
{ rintro rfl,
change sqrt (re ⟪0, 0⟫) = 0,
simp only [sqrt_zero, inner_zero_right, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] }
end,
triangle := assume x y,
begin
have h₁ : abs ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ := abs_inner_le_norm _ _,
have h₂ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ abs ⟪x, y⟫ := re_le_abs _,
have h₃ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ := by linarith,
have h₄ : re ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ := by rwa [←inner_conj_sym, conj_re],
have : ∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ ≤ (∥x∥ + ∥y∥) * (∥x∥ + ∥y∥),
{ simp [←inner_self_eq_norm_sq, inner_add_add_self, add_mul, mul_add, mul_comm],
linarith },
exact nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (add_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) this
end,
norm_neg := λ x, by simp only [norm, inner_neg_left, neg_neg, inner_neg_right] }
local attribute [instance] to_normed_group
/-- Normed space structure constructed from a `inner_product_space.core` structure -/
def to_normed_space : normed_space 𝕜 F :=
{ norm_smul_le := assume r x,
begin
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, ←mul_assoc],
rw [conj_mul_eq_norm_sq_left, of_real_mul_re, sqrt_mul, ←inner_norm_sq_eq_inner_self,
of_real_re],
{ simp [sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm, is_R_or_C.sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm] },
{ exact norm_sq_nonneg r }
end }
end inner_product_space.of_core
/-- Given a `inner_product_space.core` structure on a space, one can use it to turn
the space into an inner product space, constructing the norm out of the inner product -/
def inner_product_space.of_core [add_comm_group F] [module 𝕜 F]
(c : inner_product_space.core 𝕜 F) : inner_product_space 𝕜 F :=
begin
letI : normed_group F := @inner_product_space.of_core.to_normed_group 𝕜 F _ _ _ c,
letI : normed_space 𝕜 F := @inner_product_space.of_core.to_normed_space 𝕜 F _ _ _ c,
exact { norm_sq_eq_inner := λ x,
begin
have h₁ : ∥x∥^2 = (sqrt (re (c.inner x x))) ^ 2 := rfl,
have h₂ : 0 ≤ re (c.inner x x) := inner_product_space.of_core.inner_self_nonneg,
simp [h₁, sq_sqrt, h₂],
end,
..c }
end
/-! ### Properties of inner product spaces -/
variables [inner_product_space 𝕜 E] [inner_product_space ℝ F]
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation `IK` := @is_R_or_C.I 𝕜 _
local notation `absR` := _root_.abs
local notation `absK` := @is_R_or_C.abs 𝕜 _
local postfix `†`:90 := @is_R_or_C.conj 𝕜 _
local postfix `⋆`:90 := complex.conj
export inner_product_space (norm_sq_eq_inner)
section basic_properties
@[simp] lemma inner_conj_sym (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_product_space.conj_sym _ _
lemma real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := inner_conj_sym x y
lemma inner_eq_zero_sym {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 :=
⟨λ h, by simp [←inner_conj_sym, h], λ h, by simp [←inner_conj_sym, h]⟩
@[simp] lemma inner_self_nonneg_im {x : E} : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [← @of_real_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
lemma inner_self_im_zero {x : E} : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := inner_self_nonneg_im
lemma inner_add_left {x y z : E} : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
inner_product_space.add_left _ _ _
lemma inner_add_right {x y z : E} : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ :=
by { rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_add_left, ring_hom.map_add], simp only [inner_conj_sym] }
lemma inner_re_symm {x y : E} : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_re]
lemma inner_im_symm {x y : E} : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_im]
lemma inner_smul_left {x y : E} {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_product_space.smul_left _ _ _
lemma real_inner_smul_left {x y : F} {r : ℝ} : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := inner_smul_left
lemma inner_smul_real_left {x y : E} {r : ℝ} : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ :=
by { rw [inner_smul_left, conj_of_real, algebra.smul_def], refl }
lemma inner_smul_right {x y : E} {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_smul_left, ring_hom.map_mul, conj_conj, inner_conj_sym]
lemma real_inner_smul_right {x y : F} {r : ℝ} : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := inner_smul_right
lemma inner_smul_real_right {x y : E} {r : ℝ} : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ :=
by { rw [inner_smul_right, algebra.smul_def], refl }
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form. -/
@[simps]
def sesq_form_of_inner : sesq_form 𝕜 E (conj_to_ring_equiv 𝕜) :=
{ sesq := λ x y, ⟪y, x⟫, -- Note that sesquilinear forms are linear in the first argument
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, inner_add_right,
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, inner_add_left,
sesq_smul_left := λ r x y, inner_smul_right,
sesq_smul_right := λ r x y, inner_smul_left }
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form. -/
@[simps]
def bilin_form_of_real_inner : bilin_form ℝ F :=
{ bilin := inner,
bilin_add_left := λ x y z, inner_add_left,
bilin_smul_left := λ a x y, inner_smul_left,
bilin_add_right := λ x y z, inner_add_right,
bilin_smul_right := λ a x y, inner_smul_right }
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
lemma sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i in s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i in s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
sesq_form.sum_right (sesq_form_of_inner) _ _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
lemma inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i in s, f i⟫ = ∑ i in s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
sesq_form.sum_left (sesq_form_of_inner) _ _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `finsupp` version. -/
lemma finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum (λ (i : ι) (a : 𝕜), a • v i), x⟫
= l.sum (λ (i : ι) (a : 𝕜), (is_R_or_C.conj a) • ⟪v i, x⟫) :=
by { convert sum_inner l.support (λ a, l a • v a) x, simp [inner_smul_left, finsupp.sum] }
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `finsupp` version. -/
lemma finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum (λ (i : ι) (a : 𝕜), a • v i)⟫ = l.sum (λ (i : ι) (a : 𝕜), a • ⟪x, v i⟫) :=
by { convert inner_sum l.support (λ a, l a • v a) x, simp [inner_smul_right, finsupp.sum] }
@[simp] lemma inner_zero_left {x : E} : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0:E), inner_smul_left, ring_hom.map_zero, zero_mul]
lemma inner_re_zero_left {x : E} : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 :=
by simp only [inner_zero_left, add_monoid_hom.map_zero]
@[simp] lemma inner_zero_right {x : E} : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_zero_left, ring_hom.map_zero]
lemma inner_re_zero_right {x : E} : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 :=
by simp only [inner_zero_right, add_monoid_hom.map_zero]
lemma inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by rw [←norm_sq_eq_inner]; exact pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) 2
lemma real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ := @inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ x
@[simp] lemma inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have h₁ : re ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw is_R_or_C.ext_iff at h; simp [h.1],
rw [←norm_sq_eq_inner x] at h₁,
rw [←norm_eq_zero],
exact pow_eq_zero h₁ },
{ rintro rfl,
exact inner_zero_left }
end
@[simp] lemma inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
rw ←inner_self_eq_zero,
have H₁ : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≥ 0, exact inner_self_nonneg,
have H₂ : re ⟪x, x⟫ = 0, exact le_antisymm h H₁,
rw is_R_or_C.ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp [H₂], by simp [inner_self_nonneg_im]⟩ },
{ rintro rfl,
simp only [inner_zero_left, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] }
end
lemma real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
by { have h := @inner_self_nonpos ℝ F _ _ x, simpa using h }
@[simp] lemma inner_self_re_to_K {x : E} : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by rw is_R_or_C.ext_iff; exact ⟨by simp, by simp [inner_self_nonneg_im]⟩
lemma inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (∥x∥ ^ 2 : 𝕜) :=
begin
suffices : (is_R_or_C.re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ∥x∥ ^ 2,
{ simpa [inner_self_re_to_K] using this },
exact_mod_cast (norm_sq_eq_inner x).symm
end
lemma inner_self_re_abs {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ = abs ⟪x, x⟫ :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw [←inner_self_re_to_K] },
symmetry,
exact is_R_or_C.abs_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg,
end
lemma inner_self_abs_to_K {x : E} : (absK ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by { rw[←inner_self_re_abs], exact inner_self_re_to_K }
lemma real_inner_self_abs {x : F} : absR ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
by { have h := @inner_self_abs_to_K ℝ F _ _ x, simpa using h }
lemma inner_abs_conj_sym {x y : E} : abs ⟪x, y⟫ = abs ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, abs_conj]
@[simp] lemma inner_neg_left {x y : E} : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ :=
by { rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left], simp }
@[simp] lemma inner_neg_right {x y : E} : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_neg_left]; simp only [ring_hom.map_neg, inner_conj_sym]
lemma inner_neg_neg {x y : E} : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
@[simp] lemma inner_self_conj {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by rw [is_R_or_C.ext_iff]; exact ⟨by rw [conj_re], by rw [conj_im, inner_self_im_zero, neg_zero]⟩
lemma inner_sub_left {x y z : E} : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left] }
lemma inner_sub_right {x y z : E} : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right] }
lemma inner_mul_conj_re_abs {x y : E} : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = abs (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) :=
by { rw[←inner_conj_sym, mul_comm], exact re_eq_abs_of_mul_conj (inner y x), }
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
lemma inner_add_add_self {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
lemma real_inner_add_add_self {x y : F} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
begin
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [←inner_conj_sym]; refl,
simp [inner_add_add_self, this],
ring,
end
/- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫` -/
lemma inner_sub_sub_self {x y : E} : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
lemma real_inner_sub_sub_self {x y : F} : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
begin
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [←inner_conj_sym]; refl,
simp [inner_sub_sub_self, this],
ring,
end
/-- Parallelogram law -/
lemma parallelogram_law {x y : E} :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) :=
by simp [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self, two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. This proof follows "Proof 2" on Wikipedia. -/
lemma inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
begin
by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ rw [hy], simp only [is_R_or_C.abs_zero, inner_zero_left, mul_zero, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] },
{ change y ≠ 0 at hy,
have hy' : ⟪y, y⟫ ≠ 0 := λ h, by rw [inner_self_eq_zero] at h; exact hy h,
set T := ⟪y, x⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫ with hT,
have h₁ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = re ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_re_symm,
have h₂ : im ⟪y, x⟫ = -im ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_im_symm,
have h₃ : ⟪y, x⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ / (⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫) = ⟪y, x⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫,
{ rw [mul_div_assoc],
have : ⟪y, y⟫ / (⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫) = 1 / ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_self hy', one_mul],
rw [this, div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, ←div_eq_mul_inv] },
have h₄ : ⟪y, y⟫ = re ⟪y, y⟫ := by simp,
have h₅ : re ⟪y, y⟫ > 0,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne inner_self_nonneg _,
intro H,
apply hy',
rw is_R_or_C.ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp [H],by simp [inner_self_nonneg_im]⟩ },
have h₆ : re ⟪y, y⟫ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt h₅,
have hmain := calc
0 ≤ re ⟪x - T • y, x - T • y⟫
: inner_self_nonneg
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re ⟪T • y, x⟫ - re ⟪x, T • y⟫ + re ⟪T • y, T • y⟫
: by simp [inner_sub_sub_self, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, h₁, h₂]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (T† * ⟪y, x⟫) - re (T * ⟪x, y⟫) + re (T * T† * ⟪y, y⟫)
: by simp [inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, mul_assoc]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫)
: by field_simp [-mul_re, hT, conj_div, h₁, h₃, inner_conj_sym]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫)
: by rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div_comm, ←mul_div_assoc]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫)
: by conv_lhs { rw [h₄] }
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw [div_re_of_real]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - abs (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw [inner_mul_conj_re_abs]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw is_R_or_C.abs_mul,
have hmain' : abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ := by linarith,
have := (mul_le_mul_right h₅).mpr hmain',
rwa [div_mul_cancel (abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫) h₆] at this }
end
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
lemma real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
begin
have h₁ : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [←inner_conj_sym]; refl,
have h₂ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ F _ _ x y,
dsimp at h₂,
have h₃ := abs_mul_abs_self ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ,
rw [h₁] at h₂,
simpa [h₃] using h₂,
end
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
lemma linear_independent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E}
(hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0) (ho : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : linear_independent 𝕜 v :=
begin
rw linear_independent_iff',
intros s g hg i hi,
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j in s, g j • v j),
{ rw inner_sum,
symmetry,
convert finset.sum_eq_single i _ _,
{ rw inner_smul_right },
{ intros j hj hji,
rw [inner_smul_right, ho i j hji.symm, mul_zero] },
{ exact λ h, false.elim (h hi) } },
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end
end basic_properties
section orthonormal_sets
variables {ι : Type*} (𝕜)
include 𝕜
/-- An orthonormal set of vectors in an `inner_product_space` -/
def orthonormal (v : ι → E) : Prop :=
(∀ i, ∥v i∥ = 1) ∧ (∀ {i j}, i ≠ j → ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0)
omit 𝕜
variables {𝕜}
/-- `if ... then ... else` characterization of an indexed set of vectors being orthonormal. (Inner
product equals Kronecker delta.) -/
lemma orthonormal_iff_ite {v : ι → E} :
orthonormal 𝕜 v ↔ ∀ i j, ⟪v i, v j⟫ = if i = j then (1:𝕜) else (0:𝕜) :=
begin
split,
{ intros hv i j,
split_ifs,
{ simp [h, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, hv.1] },
{ exact hv.2 h } },
{ intros h,
split,
{ intros i,
have h' : ∥v i∥ ^ 2 = 1 ^ 2 := by simp [norm_sq_eq_inner, h i i],
have h₁ : 0 ≤ ∥v i∥ := norm_nonneg _,
have h₂ : (0:ℝ) ≤ 1 := by norm_num,
rwa eq_of_sq_eq_sq h₁ h₂ at h' },
{ intros i j hij,
simpa [hij] using h i j } }
end
/-- `if ... then ... else` characterization of a set of vectors being orthonormal. (Inner product
equals Kronecker delta.) -/
theorem orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite {s : set E} :
orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : s → E) ↔
(∀ v ∈ s, ∀ w ∈ s, ⟪v, w⟫ = if v = w then 1 else 0) :=
begin
rw orthonormal_iff_ite,
split,
{ intros h v hv w hw,
convert h ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ using 1,
simp },
{ rintros h ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩,
convert h v hv w hw using 1,
simp }
end
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
lemma orthonormal.inner_right_finsupp {v : ι → E} (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (i : ι) :
⟪v i, finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l⟫ = l i :=
by simp [finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.inner_sum, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv]
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
lemma orthonormal.inner_right_fintype [fintype ι]
{v : ι → E} (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜) (i : ι) :
⟪v i, ∑ i : ι, (l i) • (v i)⟫ = l i :=
by simp [inner_sum, inner_smul_right, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv]
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
lemma orthonormal.inner_left_finsupp {v : ι → E} (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (i : ι) :
⟪finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l, v i⟫ = conj (l i) :=
by rw [← inner_conj_sym, hv.inner_right_finsupp]
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
lemma orthonormal.inner_left_fintype [fintype ι]
{v : ι → E} (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜) (i : ι) :
⟪∑ i : ι, (l i) • (v i), v i⟫ = conj (l i) :=
by simp [sum_inner, inner_smul_left, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv]
/-- An orthonormal set is linearly independent. -/
lemma orthonormal.linear_independent {v : ι → E} (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
linear_independent 𝕜 v :=
begin
rw linear_independent_iff,
intros l hl,
ext i,
have key : ⟪v i, finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l⟫ = ⟪v i, 0⟫ := by rw hl,
simpa [hv.inner_right_finsupp] using key
end
/-- A subfamily of an orthonormal family (i.e., a composition with an injective map) is an
orthonormal family. -/
lemma orthonormal.comp
{ι' : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) (f : ι' → ι) (hf : function.injective f) :
orthonormal 𝕜 (v ∘ f) :=
begin
rw orthonormal_iff_ite at ⊢ hv,
intros i j,
convert hv (f i) (f j) using 1,
simp [hf.eq_iff]
end
/-- A linear combination of some subset of an orthonormal set is orthogonal to other members of the
set. -/
lemma orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_zero
{v : ι → E} (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) {s : set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∉ s) {l : ι →₀ 𝕜}
(hl : l ∈ finsupp.supported 𝕜 𝕜 s) :
⟪finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l, v i⟫ = 0 :=
begin
rw finsupp.mem_supported' at hl,
simp [hv.inner_left_finsupp, hl i hi],
end
/- The material that follows, culminating in the existence of a maximal orthonormal subset, is
adapted from the corresponding development of the theory of linearly independents sets. See
`exists_linear_independent` in particular. -/
variables (𝕜 E)
lemma orthonormal_empty : orthonormal 𝕜 (λ x, x : (∅ : set E) → E) :=
by simp [orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite]
variables {𝕜 E}
lemma orthonormal_Union_of_directed
{η : Type*} {s : η → set E} (hs : directed (⊆) s) (h : ∀ i, orthonormal 𝕜 (λ x, x : s i → E)) :
orthonormal 𝕜 (λ x, x : (⋃ i, s i) → E) :=
begin
rw orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite,
rintros x ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hxi⟩ y ⟨_, ⟨j, rfl⟩, hyj⟩,
obtain ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := hs i j,
have h_orth : orthonormal 𝕜 (λ x, x : (s k) → E) := h k,
rw orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite at h_orth,
exact h_orth x (hik hxi) y (hjk hyj)
end
lemma orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed
{s : set (set E)} (hs : directed_on (⊆) s)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, orthonormal 𝕜 (λ x, x : (a : set E) → E)) :
orthonormal 𝕜 (λ x, x : (⋃₀ s) → E) :=
by rw set.sUnion_eq_Union; exact orthonormal_Union_of_directed hs.directed_coe (by simpa using h)
/-- Given an orthonormal set `v` of vectors in `E`, there exists a maximal orthonormal set
containing it. -/
lemma exists_maximal_orthonormal {s : set E} (hs : orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : s → E)) :
∃ w ⊇ s, orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : w → E) ∧ ∀ u ⊇ w, orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : u → E) → u = w :=
begin
rcases zorn.zorn_subset_nonempty {b | orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : b → E)} _ _ hs with ⟨b, bi, sb, h⟩,
{ refine ⟨b, sb, bi, _⟩,
exact λ u hus hu, h u hu hus },
{ refine λ c hc cc c0, ⟨⋃₀ c, _, _⟩,
{ exact orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed cc.directed_on (λ x xc, hc xc) },
{ exact λ _, set.subset_sUnion_of_mem } }
end
lemma orthonormal.ne_zero {v : ι → E} (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) (i : ι) : v i ≠ 0 :=
begin
have : ∥v i∥ ≠ 0,
{ rw hv.1 i,
norm_num },
simpa using this
end
open finite_dimensional
/-- A family of orthonormal vectors with the correct cardinality forms a basis. -/
def basis_of_orthonormal_of_card_eq_finrank [fintype ι] [nonempty ι] {v : ι → E}
(hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) (card_eq : fintype.card ι = finrank 𝕜 E) :
basis ι 𝕜 E :=
basis_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_finrank hv.linear_independent card_eq
@[simp] lemma coe_basis_of_orthonormal_of_card_eq_finrank [fintype ι] [nonempty ι] {v : ι → E}
(hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) (card_eq : fintype.card ι = finrank 𝕜 E) :
(basis_of_orthonormal_of_card_eq_finrank hv card_eq : ι → E) = v :=
coe_basis_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_finrank _ _
end orthonormal_sets
section norm
lemma norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : E) : ∥x∥ = sqrt (re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
begin
have h₁ : ∥x∥^2 = re ⟪x, x⟫ := norm_sq_eq_inner x,
have h₂ := congr_arg sqrt h₁,
simpa using h₂,
end
lemma norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ∥x∥ = sqrt ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
by { have h := @norm_eq_sqrt_inner ℝ F _ _ x, simpa using h }
lemma inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ :=
by rw[norm_eq_sqrt_inner, ←sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
lemma real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ :=
by { have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_sq ℝ F _ _ x, simpa using h }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_sq {x y : E} : ∥x + y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 + 2 * (re ⟪x, y⟫) + ∥y∥^2 :=
begin
repeat {rw [sq, ←inner_self_eq_norm_sq]},
rw[inner_add_add_self, two_mul],
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, add_monoid_hom.map_add],
rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_re],
end
alias norm_add_sq ← norm_add_pow_two
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_sq_real {x y : F} : ∥x + y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ∥y∥^2 :=
by { have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ F _ _, simpa using h }
alias norm_add_sq_real ← norm_add_pow_two_real
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_mul_self {x y : E} : ∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + 2 * (re ⟪x, y⟫) + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { repeat {rw [← sq]}, exact norm_add_sq }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_mul_self_real {x y : F} : ∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ F _ _, simpa using h }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_sq {x y : E} : ∥x - y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 - 2 * (re ⟪x, y⟫) + ∥y∥^2 :=
begin
repeat {rw [sq, ←inner_self_eq_norm_sq]},
rw[inner_sub_sub_self],
calc
re (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫)
= re ⟪x, x⟫ - re ⟪x, y⟫ - re ⟪y, x⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by simp
... = -re ⟪y, x⟫ - re ⟪x, y⟫ + re ⟪x, x⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by ring
... = -re (⟪x, y⟫†) - re ⟪x, y⟫ + re ⟪x, x⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by rw[inner_conj_sym]
... = -re ⟪x, y⟫ - re ⟪x, y⟫ + re ⟪x, x⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by rw[conj_re]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - 2*re ⟪x, y⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by ring
end
alias norm_sub_sq ← norm_sub_pow_two
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_sq_real {x y : F} : ∥x - y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ∥y∥^2 :=
norm_sub_sq
alias norm_sub_sq_real ← norm_sub_pow_two_real
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_mul_self {x y : E} : ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { repeat {rw [← sq]}, exact norm_sub_sq }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_mul_self_real {x y : F} : ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ F _ _, simpa using h }
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
lemma abs_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : abs ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _))
begin
have : ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ * (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = (re ⟪x, x⟫) * (re ⟪y, y⟫),
simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_sq], ring,
rw this,
conv_lhs { congr, skip, rw [inner_abs_conj_sym] },
exact inner_mul_inner_self_le _ _
end
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
lemma abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : absR ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { have h := @abs_inner_le_norm ℝ F _ _ x y, simpa using h }
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
lemma real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
include 𝕜
lemma parallelogram_law_with_norm {x y : E} :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ + ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = 2 * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥) :=
begin
simp only [← inner_self_eq_norm_sq],
rw[← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul],
simp only [re.map_add],
end
omit 𝕜
lemma parallelogram_law_with_norm_real {x y : F} :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ + ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = 2 * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥) :=
by { have h := @parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ F _ _ x y, simpa using h }
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ - ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ - ∥y∥ * ∥y∥) / 2 :=
by { rw norm_add_mul_self, ring }
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ - ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥) / 2 :=
by { rw [norm_sub_mul_self], ring }
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ - ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥) / 4 :=
by { rw [norm_add_mul_self, norm_sub_mul_self], ring }
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma im_inner_eq_norm_sub_I_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_I_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (∥x - IK • y∥ * ∥x - IK • y∥ - ∥x + IK • y∥ * ∥x + IK • y∥) / 4 :=
by { simp only [norm_add_mul_self, norm_sub_mul_self, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re], ring }
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (∥x + y∥ ^ 2 - ∥x - y∥ ^ 2 + (∥x - IK • y∥ ^ 2 - ∥x + IK • y∥ ^ 2) * IK) / 4 :=
begin
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_I_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_I_smul_mul_self_div_four],
push_cast,
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
end
section
variables {E' : Type*} [inner_product_space 𝕜 E']
/-- A linear isometry preserves the inner product. -/
@[simp] lemma linear_isometry.inner_map_map (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (x y : E) : ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
by simp [inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four, ← f.norm_map]
/-- A linear isometric equivalence preserves the inner product. -/
@[simp] lemma linear_isometry_equiv.inner_map_map (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (x y : E) :
⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
f.to_linear_isometry.inner_map_map x y
/-- A linear map that preserves the inner product is a linear isometry. -/
def linear_map.isometry_of_inner (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h : ∀ x y, ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫) : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
⟨f, λ x, by simp only [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, h]⟩
@[simp] lemma linear_map.coe_isometry_of_inner (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) :
⇑(f.isometry_of_inner h) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_map.isometry_of_inner_to_linear_map (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) :
(f.isometry_of_inner h).to_linear_map = f := rfl
/-- A linear equivalence that preserves the inner product is a linear isometric equivalence. -/
def linear_equiv.isometry_of_inner (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h : ∀ x y, ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫) :
E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
⟨f, ((f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E').isometry_of_inner h).norm_map⟩
@[simp] lemma linear_equiv.coe_isometry_of_inner (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) :
⇑(f.isometry_of_inner h) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_equiv.isometry_of_inner_to_linear_equiv (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) :
(f.isometry_of_inner h).to_linear_equiv = f := rfl
end
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ - ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ - ∥y∥ * ∥y∥) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans $
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ - ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans $
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
lemma norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
begin
rw [norm_add_mul_self, add_right_cancel_iff, add_right_eq_self, mul_eq_zero],
norm_num
end
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
lemma norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
begin
rw [norm_add_mul_self, add_right_cancel_iff, add_right_eq_self, mul_eq_zero],
apply or.inr,
simp only [h, zero_re'],
end
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
lemma norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
lemma norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
begin
rw [norm_sub_mul_self, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_right_eq_self, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero],
norm_num
end
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
lemma norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
lemma real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ∥x∥ = ∥y∥ :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw ←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _) },
simp only [←inner_self_eq_norm_sq, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right,
real_inner_comm y x, sub_eq_zero, re_to_real],
split,
{ intro h,
rw [add_comm] at h,
linarith },
{ intro h,
linarith }
end
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
lemma abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : absR (⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥)) ≤ 1 :=
begin
rw _root_.abs_div,
by_cases h : 0 = absR (∥x∥ * ∥y∥),
{ rw [←h, div_zero],
norm_num },
{ change 0 ≠ absR (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) at h,
rw div_le_iff' (lt_of_le_of_ne (ge_iff_le.mp (_root_.abs_nonneg (∥x∥ * ∥y∥))) h),
convert abs_real_inner_le_norm x y using 1,
rw [_root_.abs_mul, _root_.abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg x), _root_.abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg y),
mul_one] }
end
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
lemma real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥) :=
by rw [real_inner_smul_left, ←real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
lemma real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥) :=
by rw [inner_smul_right, ←real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq]
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
lemma abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul
{x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : abs ⟪x, r • x⟫ / (∥x∥ * ∥r • x∥) = 1 :=
begin
have hx' : ∥x∥ ≠ 0 := by simp [norm_eq_zero, hx],
have hr' : abs r ≠ 0 := by simp [is_R_or_C.abs_eq_zero, hr],
rw [inner_smul_right, is_R_or_C.abs_mul, ←inner_self_re_abs, inner_self_eq_norm_sq,
norm_smul],
rw [is_R_or_C.norm_eq_abs, ←mul_assoc, ←div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_div_cancel _ hx',
←div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel _ hr', div_self hx'],
end
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
lemma abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul
{x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : absR ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥r • x∥) = 1 :=
begin
rw ← abs_to_real,
exact abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
end
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
lemma real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul
{x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥r • x∥) = 1 :=
begin
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, ←mul_assoc ∥x∥, mul_comm _ (absR r),
mul_assoc, _root_.abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hr), div_self],
exact mul_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hr)
(λ h, hx (norm_eq_zero.1 (eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero h)))
end
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
lemma real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul
{x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥r • x∥) = -1 :=
begin
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, ←mul_assoc ∥x∥, mul_comm _ (absR r),
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, ←neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self],
exact mul_ne_zero (ne_of_lt hr)
(λ h, hx (norm_eq_zero.1 (eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero h)))
end
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
lemma abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
abs (⟪x, y⟫ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥)) = 1 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ (r : 𝕜), r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have hx0 : x ≠ 0,
{ intro hx0,
rw [hx0, inner_zero_left, zero_div] at h,
norm_num at h, },
refine and.intro hx0 _,
set r := ⟪x, y⟫ / (∥x∥ * ∥x∥) with hr,
use r,
set t := y - r • x with ht,
have ht0 : ⟪x, t⟫ = 0,
{ rw [ht, inner_sub_right, inner_smul_right, hr],
norm_cast,
rw [←inner_self_eq_norm_sq, inner_self_re_to_K,
div_mul_cancel _ (λ h, hx0 (inner_self_eq_zero.1 h)), sub_self] },
replace h : ∥r • x∥ / ∥t + r • x∥ = 1,
{ rw [←sub_add_cancel y (r • x), ←ht, inner_add_right, ht0, zero_add, inner_smul_right,
is_R_or_C.abs_div, is_R_or_C.abs_mul, ←inner_self_re_abs,
inner_self_eq_norm_sq] at h,
norm_cast at h,
rwa [_root_.abs_mul, abs_norm_eq_norm, abs_norm_eq_norm, ←mul_assoc, mul_comm,
mul_div_mul_left _ _ (λ h, hx0 (norm_eq_zero.1 h)), ←is_R_or_C.norm_eq_abs,
←norm_smul] at h },
have hr0 : r ≠ 0,
{ intro hr0,
rw [hr0, zero_smul, norm_zero, zero_div] at h,
norm_num at h },
refine and.intro hr0 _,
have h2 : ∥r • x∥ ^ 2 = ∥t + r • x∥ ^ 2,
{ rw [eq_of_div_eq_one h] },
replace h2 : ⟪r • x, r • x⟫ = ⟪t, t⟫ + ⟪t, r • x⟫ + ⟪r • x, t⟫ + ⟪r • x, r • x⟫,
{ rw [sq, sq, ←inner_self_eq_norm_sq, ←inner_self_eq_norm_sq ] at h2,
have h2' := congr_arg (λ z : ℝ, (z : 𝕜)) h2,
simp_rw [inner_self_re_to_K, inner_add_add_self] at h2',
exact h2' },
conv at h2 in ⟪r • x, t⟫ { rw [inner_smul_left, ht0, mul_zero] },
symmetry' at h2,
have h₁ : ⟪t, r • x⟫ = 0 := by { rw [inner_smul_right, ←inner_conj_sym, ht0], simp },
rw [add_zero, h₁, add_left_eq_self, add_zero, inner_self_eq_zero] at h2,
rw h2 at ht,
exact eq_of_sub_eq_zero ht.symm },
{ intro h,
rcases h with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
rw [hy, is_R_or_C.abs_div],
norm_cast,
rw [_root_.abs_mul, abs_norm_eq_norm, abs_norm_eq_norm],
exact abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr }
end
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
lemma abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
absR (⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥)) = 1 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ (r : ℝ), r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x) :=
begin
have := @abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ x y,
simpa [coe_real_eq_id] using this,
end
/--
If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥`. -/
lemma abs_inner_eq_norm_iff (x y : E) (hx0 : x ≠ 0) (hy0 : y ≠ 0):
abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ ∃ (r : 𝕜), r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
begin
have hx0' : ∥x∥ ≠ 0 := by simp [norm_eq_zero, hx0],
have hy0' : ∥y∥ ≠ 0 := by simp [norm_eq_zero, hy0],
have hxy0 : ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx0', hy0'],
have h₁ : abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ abs (⟪x, y⟫ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥)) = 1,
{ refine ⟨_ ,_⟩,
{ intro h,
norm_cast,
rw [is_R_or_C.abs_div, h, abs_of_real, _root_.abs_mul, abs_norm_eq_norm, abs_norm_eq_norm],
exact div_self hxy0 },
{ intro h,
norm_cast at h,
rwa [is_R_or_C.abs_div, abs_of_real, _root_.abs_mul, abs_norm_eq_norm, abs_norm_eq_norm,
div_eq_one_iff_eq hxy0] at h } },
rw [h₁, abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff x y],
have : x ≠ 0 := λ h, (hx0' $ norm_eq_zero.mpr h),
simp [this]
end
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
lemma real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = 1 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ y = r • x) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have ha := h,
apply_fun absR at ha,
norm_num at ha,
rcases (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff x y).1 ha with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
use [hx, r],
refine and.intro _ hy,
by_contradiction hrneg,
rw hy at h,
rw real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul hx
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hrneg) hr) at h,
norm_num at h },
{ intro h,
rcases h with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
rw hy,
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr }
end
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
lemma real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = -1 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ (r : ℝ), r < 0 ∧ y = r • x) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have ha := h,
apply_fun absR at ha,
norm_num at ha,
rcases (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff x y).1 ha with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
use [hx, r],
refine and.intro _ hy,
by_contradiction hrpos,
rw hy at h,
rw real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hrpos) hr.symm) at h,
norm_num at h },
{ intro h,
rcases h with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
rw hy,
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul hx hr }
end
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `abs_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥`. -/
lemma inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (∥x∥ : 𝕜) * ∥y∥ ↔ (∥y∥ : 𝕜) • x = (∥x∥ : 𝕜) • y :=
begin
by_cases h : (x = 0 ∨ y = 0), -- WLOG `x` and `y` are nonzero
{ cases h; simp [h] },
calc ⟪x, y⟫ = (∥x∥ : 𝕜) * ∥y∥ ↔ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ = re ⟪x, y⟫ :
begin
norm_cast,
split,
{ intros h',
simp [h'] },
{ have cauchy_schwarz := abs_inner_le_norm x y,
intros h',
rw h' at ⊢ cauchy_schwarz,
rwa re_eq_self_of_le }
end
... ↔ 2 * ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ * (∥x∥ * ∥y∥ - re ⟪x, y⟫) = 0 :
by simp [h, show (2:ℝ) ≠ 0, by norm_num, sub_eq_zero]
... ↔ ∥(∥y∥:𝕜) • x - (∥x∥:𝕜) • y∥ * ∥(∥y∥:𝕜) • x - (∥x∥:𝕜) • y∥ = 0 :
begin
simp only [norm_sub_mul_self, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, norm_smul, conj_of_real,
is_R_or_C.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_real, of_real_im, of_real_re, mul_re, abs_norm_eq_norm],
refine eq.congr _ rfl,
ring
end
... ↔ (∥y∥ : 𝕜) • x = (∥x∥ : 𝕜) • y : by simp [norm_sub_eq_zero_iff]
end
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `abs_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥`. -/
lemma inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ ∥y∥ • x = ∥x∥ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
lemma inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ∥x∥ = 1) (hy : ∥y∥ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y :=
by { convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff using 2; simp [hx, hy] }
lemma inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ ∥y∥ • x ≠ ∥x∥ • y :=
calc ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ∥x∥ * ∥y∥
↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ : ⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
... ↔ ∥y∥ • x ≠ ∥x∥ • y : not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
lemma inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ∥x∥ = 1) (hy : ∥y∥ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y :=
by { convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real; simp [hx, hy] }
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
lemma inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i in s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i in s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪(∑ i₁ in s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁), (∑ i₂ in s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂)⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ in s₁, ∑ i₂ in s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (∥v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂∥ * ∥v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂∥)) / 2 :=
by simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two,
←div_sub_div_same, ←div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib,
finset.sum_sub_distrib, finset.sum_add_distrib, ←finset.mul_sum, ←finset.sum_mul,
h₁, h₂, zero_mul, mul_zero, finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, finset.mul_sum,
neg_div, finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
/-- The inner product with a fixed left element, as a continuous linear map. This can be upgraded
to a continuous map which is jointly conjugate-linear in the left argument and linear in the right
argument, once (TODO) conjugate-linear maps have been defined. -/
def inner_right (v : E) : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ w, ⟪v, w⟫,
map_add' := λ x y, inner_add_right,
map_smul' := λ c x, inner_smul_right }
∥v∥
(by simpa [is_R_or_C.norm_eq_abs] using abs_inner_le_norm v)
@[simp] lemma inner_right_coe (v : E) : (inner_right v : E → 𝕜) = λ w, ⟪v, w⟫ := rfl
@[simp] lemma inner_right_apply (v w : E) : inner_right v w = ⟪v, w⟫ := rfl
end norm
/-! ### Inner product space structure on product spaces -/
/-
If `ι` is a finite type and each space `f i`, `i : ι`, is an inner product space,
then `Π i, f i` is an inner product space as well. Since `Π i, f i` is endowed with the sup norm,
we use instead `pi_Lp 2 one_le_two f` for the product space, which is endowed with the `L^2` norm.
-/
instance pi_Lp.inner_product_space {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] (f : ι → Type*)
[Π i, inner_product_space 𝕜 (f i)] : inner_product_space 𝕜 (pi_Lp 2 one_le_two f) :=
{ inner := λ x y, ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i),
norm_sq_eq_inner :=
begin
intro x,
have h₁ : ∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ (2 : ℕ) = ∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ (2 : ℝ),
{ apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
intros j hj,
simp [←rpow_nat_cast] },
have h₂ : 0 ≤ ∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ (2 : ℝ),
{ rw [←h₁],
exact finset.sum_nonneg (λ j (hj : j ∈ finset.univ), pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg (x j)) 2) },
simp [norm, add_monoid_hom.map_sum, ←norm_sq_eq_inner],
rw [←rpow_nat_cast ((∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ (2 : ℝ)) ^ (2 : ℝ)⁻¹) 2],
rw [←rpow_mul h₂],
norm_num [h₁],
end,
conj_sym :=
begin
intros x y,
unfold inner,
rw [←finset.sum_hom finset.univ conj],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
rintros z -,
apply inner_conj_sym,
apply_instance
end,
add_left := λ x y z,
show ∑ i, inner (x i + y i) (z i) = ∑ i, inner (x i) (z i) + ∑ i, inner (y i) (z i),
by simp only [inner_add_left, finset.sum_add_distrib],
smul_left := λ x y r,
show ∑ (i : ι), inner (r • x i) (y i) = (conj r) * ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i),
by simp only [finset.mul_sum, inner_smul_left]
}
@[simp] lemma pi_Lp.inner_apply {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {f : ι → Type*}
[Π i, inner_product_space 𝕜 (f i)] (x y : pi_Lp 2 one_le_two f) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ∑ i, ⟪x i, y i⟫ :=
rfl
lemma pi_Lp.norm_eq_of_L2 {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {f : ι → Type*}
[Π i, inner_product_space 𝕜 (f i)] (x : pi_Lp 2 one_le_two f) :
∥x∥ = sqrt (∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ 2) :=
by { rw [pi_Lp.norm_eq_of_nat 2]; simp [sqrt_eq_rpow] }
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `is_R_or_C` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance is_R_or_C.inner_product_space : inner_product_space 𝕜 𝕜 :=
{ inner := (λ x y, (conj x) * y),
norm_sq_eq_inner := λ x,
by { unfold inner, rw [mul_comm, mul_conj, of_real_re, norm_sq_eq_def'] },
conj_sym := λ x y, by simp [mul_comm],
add_left := λ x y z, by simp [inner, add_mul],
smul_left := λ x y z, by simp [inner, mul_assoc] }
@[simp] lemma is_R_or_C.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = (conj x) * y := rfl
/-- The standard real/complex Euclidean space, functions on a finite type. For an `n`-dimensional
space use `euclidean_space 𝕜 (fin n)`. -/
@[reducible, nolint unused_arguments]
def euclidean_space (𝕜 : Type*) [is_R_or_C 𝕜]
(n : Type*) [fintype n] : Type* := pi_Lp 2 one_le_two (λ (i : n), 𝕜)
lemma euclidean_space.norm_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] {n : Type*} [fintype n]
(x : euclidean_space 𝕜 n) : ∥x∥ = real.sqrt (∑ (i : n), ∥x i∥ ^ 2) :=
pi_Lp.norm_eq_of_L2 x
/-! ### Inner product space structure on subspaces -/
/-- Induced inner product on a submodule. -/
instance submodule.inner_product_space (W : submodule 𝕜 E) : inner_product_space 𝕜 W :=
{ inner := λ x y, ⟪(x:E), (y:E)⟫,
conj_sym := λ _ _, inner_conj_sym _ _ ,
norm_sq_eq_inner := λ _, norm_sq_eq_inner _,
add_left := λ _ _ _ , inner_add_left,
smul_left := λ _ _ _, inner_smul_left,
..submodule.normed_space W }
/-- The inner product on submodules is the same as on the ambient space. -/
@[simp] lemma submodule.coe_inner (W : submodule 𝕜 E) (x y : W) : ⟪x, y⟫ = ⟪(x:E), ↑y⟫ := rfl
section is_R_or_C_to_real
variables {G : Type*}
variables (𝕜 E)
include 𝕜
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since it creates problems with the case `𝕜 = ℝ`. -/
def has_inner.is_R_or_C_to_real : has_inner ℝ E :=
{ inner := λ x y, re ⟪x, y⟫ }
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure. This is not
registered as an instance since it creates problems with the case `𝕜 = ℝ`, but in can be used in a
proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given `𝕜`-inner product space
structure. -/
def inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real : inner_product_space ℝ E :=
{ norm_sq_eq_inner := norm_sq_eq_inner,
conj_sym := λ x y, inner_re_symm,
add_left := λ x y z, by {
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫,
simp [inner_add_left] },
smul_left := λ x y r, by {
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫,
simp [inner_smul_left] },
..has_inner.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜 E,
..normed_space.restrict_scalars ℝ 𝕜 E }
variable {E}
lemma real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@has_inner.inner ℝ E (has_inner.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ := rfl
omit 𝕜
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product -/
instance inner_product_space.complex_to_real [inner_product_space ℂ G] : inner_product_space ℝ G :=
inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real ℂ G
end is_R_or_C_to_real
section deriv
/-!
### Derivative of the inner product
In this section we prove that the inner product and square of the norm in an inner space are
infinitely `ℝ`-smooth. In order to state these results, we need a `normed_space ℝ E`
instance. Though we can deduce this structure from `inner_product_space 𝕜 E`, this instance may be
not definitionally equal to some other “natural” instance. So, we assume `[normed_space ℝ E]` and
`[is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E]`. In both interesting cases `𝕜 = ℝ` and `𝕜 = ℂ` we have these instances.
-/
variables [normed_space ℝ E] [is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E]
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map_inner : is_bounded_bilinear_map ℝ (λ p : E × E, ⟪p.1, p.2⟫) :=
{ add_left := λ _ _ _, inner_add_left,
smul_left := λ r x y,
by simp only [← algebra_map_smul 𝕜 r x, algebra_map_eq_of_real, inner_smul_real_left],
add_right := λ _ _ _, inner_add_right,
smul_right := λ r x y,
by simp only [← algebra_map_smul 𝕜 r y, algebra_map_eq_of_real, inner_smul_real_right],
bound := ⟨1, zero_lt_one, λ x y,
by { rw [one_mul, is_R_or_C.norm_eq_abs], exact abs_inner_le_norm x y, }⟩ }
/-- Derivative of the inner product. -/
def fderiv_inner_clm (p : E × E) : E × E →L[ℝ] 𝕜 := is_bounded_bilinear_map_inner.deriv p
@[simp] lemma fderiv_inner_clm_apply (p x : E × E) :
fderiv_inner_clm p x = ⟪p.1, x.2⟫ + ⟪x.1, p.2⟫ := rfl
lemma times_cont_diff_inner {n} : times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ p : E × E, ⟪p.1, p.2⟫) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_inner.times_cont_diff
lemma times_cont_diff_at_inner {p : E × E} {n} :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ p : E × E, ⟪p.1, p.2⟫) p :=
times_cont_diff_inner.times_cont_diff_at
lemma differentiable_inner : differentiable ℝ (λ p : E × E, ⟪p.1, p.2⟫) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_inner.differentiable_at
variables {G : Type*} [normed_group G] [normed_space ℝ G]
{f g : G → E} {f' g' : G →L[ℝ] E} {s : set G} {x : G} {n : with_top ℕ}
include 𝕜
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.inner (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x)
(hg : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n g s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) s x :=
times_cont_diff_at_inner.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x (hf.prod hg)
lemma times_cont_diff_at.inner (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n f x)
(hg : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n g x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) x :=
hf.inner hg
lemma times_cont_diff_on.inner (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n f s) (hg : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n g s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).inner (hg x hx)
lemma times_cont_diff.inner (hf : times_cont_diff ℝ n f) (hg : times_cont_diff ℝ n g) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) :=
times_cont_diff_inner.comp (hf.prod hg)
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.inner (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x)
(hg : has_fderiv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderiv_inner_clm (f x, g x)).comp $ f'.prod g') s x :=
(is_bounded_bilinear_map_inner.has_fderiv_at (f x, g x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x (hf.prod hg)
lemma has_fderiv_at.inner (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hg : has_fderiv_at g g' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderiv_inner_clm (f x, g x)).comp $ f'.prod g') x :=
(is_bounded_bilinear_map_inner.has_fderiv_at (f x, g x)).comp x (hf.prod hg)
lemma has_deriv_within_at.inner {f g : ℝ → E} {f' g' : E} {s : set ℝ} {x : ℝ}
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_deriv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) (⟪f x, g'⟫ + ⟪f', g x⟫) s x :=
by simpa using (hf.has_fderiv_within_at.inner hg.has_fderiv_within_at).has_deriv_within_at
lemma has_deriv_at.inner {f g : ℝ → E} {f' g' : E} {x : ℝ} :
has_deriv_at f f' x → has_deriv_at g g' x →
has_deriv_at (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) (⟪f x, g'⟫ + ⟪f', g x⟫) x :=
by simpa only [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] using has_deriv_within_at.inner
lemma differentiable_within_at.inner (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hg : differentiable_within_at ℝ g s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) s x :=
((differentiable_inner _).has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x
(hf.prod hg).has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.inner (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hg : differentiable_at ℝ g x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) x :=
(differentiable_inner _).comp x (hf.prod hg)
lemma differentiable_on.inner (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hg : differentiable_on ℝ g s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).inner (hg x hx)
lemma differentiable.inner (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hg : differentiable ℝ g) :
differentiable ℝ (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) :=
λ x, (hf x).inner (hg x)
lemma fderiv_inner_apply (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hg : differentiable_at ℝ g x) (y : G) :
fderiv ℝ (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) x y = ⟪f x, fderiv ℝ g x y⟫ + ⟪fderiv ℝ f x y, g x⟫ :=
by { rw [(hf.has_fderiv_at.inner hg.has_fderiv_at).fderiv], refl }
lemma deriv_inner_apply {f g : ℝ → E} {x : ℝ} (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x)
(hg : differentiable_at ℝ g x) :
deriv (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) x = ⟪f x, deriv g x⟫ + ⟪deriv f x, g x⟫ :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.inner hg.has_deriv_at).deriv
lemma times_cont_diff_norm_sq : times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ x : E, ∥x∥ ^ 2) :=
begin
simp only [sq, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq],
exact (re_clm : 𝕜 →L[ℝ] ℝ).times_cont_diff.comp (times_cont_diff_id.inner times_cont_diff_id)
end
lemma times_cont_diff.norm_sq (hf : times_cont_diff ℝ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ x, ∥f x∥ ^ 2) :=
times_cont_diff_norm_sq.comp hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.norm_sq (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ y, ∥f y∥ ^ 2) s x :=
times_cont_diff_norm_sq.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_at.norm_sq (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ y, ∥f y∥ ^ 2) x :=
hf.norm_sq
lemma times_cont_diff_at_norm {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n norm x :=
have ∥id x∥ ^ 2 ≠ 0, from pow_ne_zero _ (norm_pos_iff.2 hx).ne',
by simpa only [id, sqrt_sq, norm_nonneg] using times_cont_diff_at_id.norm_sq.sqrt this
lemma times_cont_diff_at.norm (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n f x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ y, ∥f y∥) x :=
(times_cont_diff_at_norm h0).comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_at.dist (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n f x) (hg : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n g x)
(hne : f x ≠ g x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ y, dist (f y) (g y)) x :=
by { simp only [dist_eq_norm], exact (hf.sub hg).norm (sub_ne_zero.2 hne) }
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.norm (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ y, ∥f y∥) s x :=
(times_cont_diff_at_norm h0).comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.dist (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x)
(hg : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n g s x) (hne : f x ≠ g x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ y, dist (f y) (g y)) s x :=
by { simp only [dist_eq_norm], exact (hf.sub hg).norm (sub_ne_zero.2 hne) }
lemma times_cont_diff_on.norm_sq (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ y, ∥f y∥ ^ 2) s :=
(λ x hx, (hf x hx).norm_sq)
lemma times_cont_diff_on.norm (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
times_cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ y, ∥f y∥) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).norm (h0 x hx)
lemma times_cont_diff_on.dist (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n f s)
(hg : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n g s) (hne : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ g x) :
times_cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ y, dist (f y) (g y)) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).dist (hg x hx) (hne x hx)
lemma times_cont_diff.norm (hf : times_cont_diff ℝ n f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ y, ∥f y∥) :=
times_cont_diff_iff_times_cont_diff_at.2 $ λ x, hf.times_cont_diff_at.norm (h0 x)
lemma times_cont_diff.dist (hf : times_cont_diff ℝ n f) (hg : times_cont_diff ℝ n g)
(hne : ∀ x, f x ≠ g x) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ y, dist (f y) (g y)) :=
times_cont_diff_iff_times_cont_diff_at.2 $
λ x, hf.times_cont_diff_at.dist hg.times_cont_diff_at (hne x)
lemma differentiable_at.norm_sq (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λ y, ∥f y∥ ^ 2) x :=
(times_cont_diff_at_id.norm_sq.differentiable_at le_rfl).comp x hf
lemma differentiable_at.norm (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λ y, ∥f y∥) x :=
((times_cont_diff_at_norm h0).differentiable_at le_rfl).comp x hf
lemma differentiable_at.dist (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hg : differentiable_at ℝ g x)
(hne : f x ≠ g x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λ y, dist (f y) (g y)) x :=
by { simp only [dist_eq_norm], exact (hf.sub hg).norm (sub_ne_zero.2 hne) }
lemma differentiable.norm_sq (hf : differentiable ℝ f) : differentiable ℝ (λ y, ∥f y∥ ^ 2) :=
λ x, (hf x).norm_sq
lemma differentiable.norm (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable ℝ (λ y, ∥f y∥) :=
λ x, (hf x).norm (h0 x)
lemma differentiable.dist (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hg : differentiable ℝ g)
(hne : ∀ x, f x ≠ g x) :
differentiable ℝ (λ y, dist (f y) (g y)) :=
λ x, (hf x).dist (hg x) (hne x)
lemma differentiable_within_at.norm_sq (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ y, ∥f y∥ ^ 2) s x :=
(times_cont_diff_at_id.norm_sq.differentiable_at le_rfl).comp_differentiable_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.norm (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ y, ∥f y∥) s x :=
((times_cont_diff_at_id.norm h0).differentiable_at le_rfl).comp_differentiable_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.dist (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hg : differentiable_within_at ℝ g s x) (hne : f x ≠ g x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ y, dist (f y) (g y)) s x :=
by { simp only [dist_eq_norm], exact (hf.sub hg).norm (sub_ne_zero.2 hne) }
lemma differentiable_on.norm_sq (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λ y, ∥f y∥ ^ 2) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).norm_sq
lemma differentiable_on.norm (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λ y, ∥f y∥) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).norm (h0 x hx)
lemma differentiable_on.dist (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hg : differentiable_on ℝ g s)
(hne : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ g x) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λ y, dist (f y) (g y)) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).dist (hg x hx) (hne x hx)
end deriv
section continuous
/-!
### Continuity and measurability of the inner product
Since the inner product is `ℝ`-smooth, it is continuous. We do not need a `[normed_space ℝ E]`
structure to *state* this fact and its corollaries, so we introduce them in the proof instead.
-/
lemma continuous_inner : continuous (λ p : E × E, ⟪p.1, p.2⟫) :=
begin
letI : inner_product_space ℝ E := inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜 E,
letI : is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E := restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower _ _ _,
exact differentiable_inner.continuous
end
variables {α : Type*}
lemma filter.tendsto.inner {f g : α → E} {l : filter α} {x y : E} (hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 x))
(hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
tendsto (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) l (𝓝 ⟪x, y⟫) :=
(continuous_inner.tendsto _).comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
lemma measurable.inner [measurable_space α] [measurable_space E] [opens_measurable_space E]
[topological_space.second_countable_topology E] [measurable_space 𝕜] [borel_space 𝕜]
{f g : α → E} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) :=
continuous.measurable2 continuous_inner hf hg
lemma ae_measurable.inner [measurable_space α] [measurable_space E] [opens_measurable_space E]
[topological_space.second_countable_topology E] [measurable_space 𝕜] [borel_space 𝕜]
{μ : measure_theory.measure α} {f g : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) μ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x, ⟪hf.mk f x, hg.mk g x⟫, hf.measurable_mk.inner hg.measurable_mk, _⟩,
refine hf.ae_eq_mk.mp (hg.ae_eq_mk.mono (λ x hxg hxf, _)),
dsimp only,
congr,
{ exact hxf, },
{ exact hxg, },
end
variables [topological_space α] {f g : α → E} {x : α} {s : set α}
include 𝕜
lemma continuous_within_at.inner (hf : continuous_within_at f s x)
(hg : continuous_within_at g s x) :
continuous_within_at (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) s x :=
hf.inner hg
lemma continuous_at.inner (hf : continuous_at f x) (hg : continuous_at g x) :
continuous_at (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) x :=
hf.inner hg
lemma continuous_on.inner (hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) :
continuous_on (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).inner (hg x hx)
lemma continuous.inner (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, hf.continuous_at.inner hg.continuous_at
end continuous
section pi_Lp
local attribute [reducible] pi_Lp
variables {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
instance : finite_dimensional 𝕜 (euclidean_space 𝕜 ι) := by apply_instance
instance : inner_product_space 𝕜 (euclidean_space 𝕜 ι) := by apply_instance
@[simp] lemma finrank_euclidean_space :
finite_dimensional.finrank 𝕜 (euclidean_space 𝕜 ι) = fintype.card ι := by simp
lemma finrank_euclidean_space_fin {n : ℕ} :
finite_dimensional.finrank 𝕜 (euclidean_space 𝕜 (fin n)) = n := by simp
/-- An orthonormal basis on a fintype `ι` for an inner product space induces an isometry with
`euclidean_space 𝕜 ι`. -/
def basis.isometry_euclidean_of_orthonormal
(v : basis ι 𝕜 E) (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (euclidean_space 𝕜 ι) :=
v.equiv_fun.isometry_of_inner
begin
intros x y,
let p : euclidean_space 𝕜 ι := v.equiv_fun x,
let q : euclidean_space 𝕜 ι := v.equiv_fun y,
have key : ⟪p, q⟫ = ⟪∑ i, p i • v i, ∑ i, q i • v i⟫,
{ simp [sum_inner, inner_smul_left, hv.inner_right_fintype] },
convert key,
{ rw [← v.equiv_fun.symm_apply_apply x, v.equiv_fun_symm_apply] },
{ rw [← v.equiv_fun.symm_apply_apply y, v.equiv_fun_symm_apply] }
end
/-- `ℂ` is isometric to ℝ² with the Euclidean inner product. -/
def complex.isometry_euclidean : ℂ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] (euclidean_space ℝ (fin 2)) :=
complex.basis_one_I.isometry_euclidean_of_orthonormal
begin
rw orthonormal_iff_ite,
intros i, fin_cases i;
intros j; fin_cases j;
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner]
end
@[simp] lemma complex.isometry_euclidean_symm_apply (x : euclidean_space ℝ (fin 2)) :
complex.isometry_euclidean.symm x = (x 0) + (x 1) * I :=
begin
convert complex.basis_one_I.equiv_fun_symm_apply x,
{ simpa },
{ simp },
end
lemma complex.isometry_euclidean_proj_eq_self (z : ℂ) :
↑(complex.isometry_euclidean z 0) + ↑(complex.isometry_euclidean z 1) * (I : ℂ) = z :=
by rw [← complex.isometry_euclidean_symm_apply (complex.isometry_euclidean z),
complex.isometry_euclidean.symm_apply_apply z]
@[simp] lemma complex.isometry_euclidean_apply_zero (z : ℂ) :
complex.isometry_euclidean z 0 = z.re :=
by { conv_rhs { rw ← complex.isometry_euclidean_proj_eq_self z }, simp }
@[simp] lemma complex.isometry_euclidean_apply_one (z : ℂ) :
complex.isometry_euclidean z 1 = z.im :=
by { conv_rhs { rw ← complex.isometry_euclidean_proj_eq_self z }, simp }
end pi_Lp
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
section orthogonal
open filter
/--
Existence of minimizers
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
-/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
theorem exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex {K : set F} (ne : K.nonempty) (h₁ : is_complete K)
(h₂ : convex K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ∥u - v∥ = ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥ := assume u,
begin
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥,
letI : nonempty K := ne.to_subtype,
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_cinfi (λ _, norm_nonneg _),
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥,
from cinfi_le ⟨0, set.forall_range_iff.2 $ λ _, norm_nonneg _⟩,
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥ := assume w hw, δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩,
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `∥u - w n∥ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `∥u - w n∥ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ∥u - w n∥ < δ + 1 / (n + 1),
{ have hδ : ∀n:ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1), from
λ n, lt_add_of_le_of_pos (le_refl _) nat.one_div_pos_of_nat,
have h := λ n, exists_lt_of_cinfi_lt (hδ n),
let w : ℕ → K := λ n, classical.some (h n),
exact ⟨w, λ n, classical.some_spec (h n)⟩ },
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩,
have norm_tendsto : tendsto (λ n, ∥u - w n∥) at_top (nhds δ),
{ have h : tendsto (λ n:ℕ, δ) at_top (nhds δ) := tendsto_const_nhds,
have h' : tendsto (λ n:ℕ, δ + 1 / (n + 1)) at_top (nhds δ),
{ convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat, simp only [add_zero] },
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h'
(λ x, δ_le _) (λ x, le_of_lt (hw _)) },
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : cauchy_seq (λ n, ((w n):F)),
{ rw cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0, -- splits into three goals
let b := λ n:ℕ, (8 * δ * (1/(n+1)) + 4 * (1/(n+1)) * (1/(n+1))),
use (λn, sqrt (b n)),
split,
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ sqrt (b n)`
assume n, exact sqrt_nonneg _,
split,
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ sqrt (b N)`
assume p q N hp hq,
let wp := ((w p):F), let wq := ((w q):F),
let a := u - wq, let b := u - wp,
let half := 1 / (2:ℝ), let div := 1 / ((N:ℝ) + 1),
have : 4 * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ + ∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥ =
2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) :=
calc
4 * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥ + ∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥
= (2*∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) * (2 * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) + ∥wp-wq∥*∥wp-wq∥ : by ring
... = (absR ((2:ℝ)) * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) * (absR ((2:ℝ)) * ∥u - half•(wq+wp)∥) +
∥wp-wq∥*∥wp-wq∥ :
by { rw _root_.abs_of_nonneg, exact zero_le_two }
... = ∥(2:ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))∥ * ∥(2:ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))∥ +
∥wp-wq∥ * ∥wp-wq∥ :
by simp [norm_smul]
... = ∥a + b∥ * ∥a + b∥ + ∥a - b∥ * ∥a - b∥ :
begin
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0),
← one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul],
simp only [one_smul],
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b, from (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm,
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b, show u + u - (wq + wp) = (u - wq) + (u - wp), abel,
rw [eq₁, eq₂],
end
... = 2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) : parallelogram_law_with_norm,
have eq : δ ≤ ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥,
{ rw smul_add,
apply δ_le', apply h₂,
repeat {exact subtype.mem _},
repeat {exact le_of_lt one_half_pos},
exact add_halves 1 },
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥,
{ mono, mono, norm_num, apply mul_nonneg, norm_num, exact norm_nonneg _ },
have eq₂ : ∥a∥ * ∥a∥ ≤ (δ + div) * (δ + div) :=
mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
(le_trans (le_of_lt $ hw q) (add_le_add_left (nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)),
have eq₂' : ∥b∥ * ∥b∥ ≤ (δ + div) * (δ + div) :=
mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
(le_trans (le_of_lt $ hw p) (add_le_add_left (nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)),
rw dist_eq_norm,
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq, { exact sqrt_nonneg _ },
rw mul_self_sqrt,
exact calc
∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥ = 2 * (∥a∥*∥a∥ + ∥b∥*∥b∥) -
4 * ∥u - half • (wq+wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq+wp)∥ : by { rw ← this, simp }
... ≤ 2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) - 4 * δ * δ : sub_le_sub_left eq₁ _
... ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ :
sub_le_sub_right (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (add_le_add eq₂ eq₂') (by norm_num)) _
... = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div : by ring,
exact add_nonneg
(mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) zero_le_δ) (le_of_lt nat.one_div_pos_of_nat))
(mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) nat.one_div_pos_of_nat.le) nat.one_div_pos_of_nat.le),
-- third goal : `tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), sqrt (b n)) at_top (𝓝 0)`
apply tendsto.comp,
{ convert continuous_sqrt.continuous_at, exact sqrt_zero.symm },
have eq₁ : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (nhds (0:ℝ)),
{ convert (@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ (8 * δ) _).mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), (4:ℝ) * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (nhds (0:ℝ)),
{ convert (@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ (4:ℝ) _).mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
have eq₂ : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), (4:ℝ) * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (nhds (0:ℝ)),
{ convert this.mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
convert eq₁.add eq₂, simp only [add_zero] },
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_is_complete h₁ (λ n, _) seq_is_cauchy with ⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩,
use v, use hv,
have h_cont : continuous (λ v, ∥u - v∥) :=
continuous.comp continuous_norm (continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id),
have : tendsto (λ n, ∥u - w n∥) at_top (nhds ∥u - v∥),
convert (tendsto.comp h_cont.continuous_at w_tendsto),
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto,
exact subtype.mem _
end
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : set F} (h : convex K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : ∥u - v∥ = (⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 :=
iff.intro
begin
assume eq w hw,
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥, let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ, let q := ∥w - v∥^2,
letI : nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩,
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ,
apply le_cinfi, intro, exact norm_nonneg _,
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥,
assume w, apply cinfi_le, use (0:ℝ), rintros _ ⟨_, rfl⟩, exact norm_nonneg _,
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥ := assume w hw, δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩,
have : ∀θ:ℝ, 0 < θ → θ ≤ 1 → 2 * p ≤ θ * q,
assume θ hθ₁ hθ₂,
have : ∥u - v∥^2 ≤ ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ*θ*∥w - v∥^2 :=
calc
∥u - v∥^2 ≤ ∥u - (θ•w + (1-θ)•v)∥^2 :
begin
simp only [sq], apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _),
rw [eq], apply δ_le',
apply h hw hv,
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel'_right _ _],
end
... = ∥(u - v) - θ • (w - v)∥^2 :
begin
have : u - (θ•w + (1-θ)•v) = (u - v) - θ • (w - v),
{ rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul],
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev] },
rw this
end
... = ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ*θ*∥w - v∥^2 :
begin
rw [norm_sub_sq, inner_smul_right, norm_smul],
simp only [sq],
show ∥u-v∥*∥u-v∥-2*(θ*inner(u-v)(w-v))+absR (θ)*∥w-v∥*(absR (θ)*∥w-v∥)=
∥u-v∥*∥u-v∥-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)+θ*θ*(∥w-v∥*∥w-v∥),
rw abs_of_pos hθ₁, ring
end,
have eq₁ : ∥u-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)+θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2=∥u-v∥^2+(θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)),
by abel,
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this,
have eq₂ : θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)=θ*(θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*inner(u-v)(w-v)), ring,
rw eq₂ at this,
have := le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left this hθ₁),
exact this,
by_cases hq : q = 0,
{ rw hq at this,
have : p ≤ 0,
have := this (1:ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num),
linarith,
exact this },
{ have q_pos : 0 < q,
apply lt_of_le_of_ne, exact sq_nonneg _, intro h, exact hq h.symm,
by_contradiction hp, rw not_le at hp,
let θ := min (1:ℝ) (p / q),
have eq₁ : θ*q ≤ p := calc
θ*q ≤ (p/q) * q : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
... = p : div_mul_cancel _ hq,
have : 2 * p ≤ p := calc
2 * p ≤ θ*q : by { refine this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num) }
... ≤ p : eq₁,
linarith }
end
begin
assume h,
letI : nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩,
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply le_cinfi, assume w,
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _),
have := h w w.2,
exact calc
∥u - v∥ * ∥u - v∥ ≤ ∥u - v∥ * ∥u - v∥ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w:F) - v) : by linarith
... ≤ ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w:F) - v) + ∥(w:F) - v∥^2 :
by { rw sq, refine le_add_of_nonneg_right _, exact sq_nonneg _ }
... = ∥(u - v) - (w - v)∥^2 : norm_sub_sq.symm
... = ∥u - w∥ * ∥u - w∥ :
by { have : (u - v) - (w - v) = u - w, abel, rw [this, sq] } },
{ show (⨅ (w : K), ∥u - w∥) ≤ (λw:K, ∥u - w∥) ⟨v, hv⟩,
apply cinfi_le, use 0, rintros y ⟨z, rfl⟩, exact norm_nonneg _ }
end
variables (K : submodule 𝕜 E)
/--
Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace
(h : is_complete (↑K : set E)) : ∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ∥u - v∥ = ⨅ w : (K : set E), ∥u - w∥ :=
begin
letI : inner_product_space ℝ E := inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜 E,
letI : module ℝ E := restrict_scalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E,
letI : is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E := restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower _ _ _,
let K' : submodule ℝ E := submodule.restrict_scalars ℝ K,
exact exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
end
/--
Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superceded by `norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `is_R_or_C` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : ∥u - v∥ = (⨅ w : (↑K : set F), ∥u - w∥) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
iff.intro
begin
assume h,
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0,
{ rwa [norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h, exacts [K.convex, hv] },
assume w hw,
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0,
let w' := w + v,
have : w' ∈ K := submodule.add_mem _ hw hv,
have h₁ := h w' this,
have h₂ : w' - v = w, simp only [add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg],
rw h₂ at h₁, exact h₁,
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0,
let w'' := -w + v,
have : w'' ∈ K := submodule.add_mem _ (submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv,
have h₁ := h w'' this,
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w, simp only [neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg],
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁,
linarith,
exact le_antisymm le ge
end
begin
assume h,
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0,
assume w hw,
let w' := w - v,
have : w' ∈ K := submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv,
have h₁ := h w' this,
exact le_of_eq h₁,
rwa norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero,
exacts [submodule.convex _, hv]
end
/--
Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) : ∥u - v∥ = (⨅ w : (↑K : set E), ∥u - w∥) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 :=
begin
letI : inner_product_space ℝ E := inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜 E,
letI : module ℝ E := restrict_scalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E,
letI : is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E := restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower _ _ _,
let K' : submodule ℝ E := K.restrict_scalars ℝ,
split,
{ assume H,
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).1 H,
assume w hw,
apply ext,
{ simp [A w hw] },
{ symmetry, calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 : im.map_zero
... = re ⟪u - v, (-I) • w⟫ : (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
... = re ((-I) * ⟪u - v, w⟫) : by rw inner_smul_right
... = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ : by simp } },
{ assume H,
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0,
{ assume w hw,
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw],
exact zero_re' },
exact (norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).2 this }
end
section orthogonal_projection
variables [complete_space K]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonal_projection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonal_projection_fn (v : E) :=
(exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace K (complete_space_coe_iff_is_complete.mp ‹_›) v).some
variables {K}
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_mem (v : E) : orthogonal_projection_fn K v ∈ K :=
(exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace K
(complete_space_coe_iff_is_complete.mp ‹_›) v).some_spec.some
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonal_projection_fn K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
begin
rw ←norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero K (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem v),
exact (exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace K
(complete_space_coe_iff_is_complete.mp ‹_›) v).some_spec.some_spec
end
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
lemma eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
{u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K) (hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) :
orthogonal_projection_fn K u = v :=
begin
rw [←sub_eq_zero, ←inner_self_eq_zero],
have hvs : orthogonal_projection_fn K u - v ∈ K :=
submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem u) hvm,
have huo : ⟪u - orthogonal_projection_fn K u, orthogonal_projection_fn K u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs,
have huv : ⟪u - v, orthogonal_projection_fn K u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs,
have houv : ⟪(u - v) - (u - orthogonal_projection_fn K u), orthogonal_projection_fn K u - v⟫ = 0,
{ rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero] },
rwa sub_sub_sub_cancel_left at houv
end
variables (K)
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_norm_sq (v : E) :
∥v∥ * ∥v∥ = ∥v - (orthogonal_projection_fn K v)∥ * ∥v - (orthogonal_projection_fn K v)∥
+ ∥orthogonal_projection_fn K v∥ * ∥orthogonal_projection_fn K v∥ :=
begin
set p := orthogonal_projection_fn K v,
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0,
{ exact orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem v) },
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2;
simp,
end
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. -/
def orthogonal_projection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ v, ⟨orthogonal_projection_fn K v, orthogonal_projection_fn_mem v⟩,
map_add' := λ x y, begin
have hm : orthogonal_projection_fn K x + orthogonal_projection_fn K y ∈ K :=
submodule.add_mem K (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem x) (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem y),
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (orthogonal_projection_fn K x + orthogonal_projection_fn K y), w⟫ = 0,
{ intros w hw,
rw [add_sub_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero] },
ext,
simp [eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
end,
map_smul' := λ c x, begin
have hm : c • orthogonal_projection_fn K x ∈ K :=
submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem x),
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • orthogonal_projection_fn K x, w⟫ = 0,
{ intros w hw,
rw [←smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, mul_zero] },
ext,
simp [eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
end }
1
(λ x, begin
simp only [one_mul, linear_map.coe_mk],
refine le_of_pow_le_pow 2 (norm_nonneg _) (by norm_num) _,
change ∥orthogonal_projection_fn K x∥ ^ 2 ≤ ∥x∥ ^ 2,
nlinarith [orthogonal_projection_fn_norm_sq K x]
end)
variables {K}
@[simp]
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_eq (v : E) :
orthogonal_projection_fn K v = (orthogonal_projection K v : E) :=
rfl
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
lemma orthogonal_projection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonal_projection K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero v
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
lemma eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
{u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K) (hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) :
(orthogonal_projection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
/-- The orthogonal projections onto equal subspaces are coerced back to the same point in `E`. -/
lemma eq_orthogonal_projection_of_eq_submodule
{K' : submodule 𝕜 E} [complete_space K'] (h : K = K') (u : E) :
(orthogonal_projection K u : E) = (orthogonal_projection K' u : E) :=
begin
change orthogonal_projection_fn K u = orthogonal_projection_fn K' u,
congr,
exact h
end
/-- The orthogonal projection sends elements of `K` to themselves. -/
@[simp] lemma orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : orthogonal_projection K v = v :=
by { ext, apply eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero; simp }
local attribute [instance] finite_dimensional_bot
/-- The orthogonal projection onto the trivial submodule is the zero map. -/
@[simp] lemma orthogonal_projection_bot : orthogonal_projection (⊥ : submodule 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
begin
ext u,
apply eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero,
{ simp },
{ intros w hw,
simp [(submodule.mem_bot 𝕜).mp hw] }
end
variables (K)
/-- The orthogonal projection has norm `≤ 1`. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_norm_le : ∥orthogonal_projection K∥ ≤ 1 :=
linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (by norm_num) _
variables (𝕜)
lemma smul_orthogonal_projection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
(∥v∥ ^ 2 : 𝕜) • (orthogonal_projection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v :=
begin
suffices : ↑(orthogonal_projection (𝕜 ∙ v) ((∥v∥ ^ 2 : 𝕜) • w)) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v,
{ simpa using this },
apply eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero,
{ rw submodule.mem_span_singleton,
use ⟪v, w⟫ },
{ intros x hx,
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hx,
have hv : ↑∥v∥ ^ 2 = ⟪v, v⟫ := by { norm_cast, simp [norm_sq_eq_inner] },
simp [inner_sub_left, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, is_R_or_C.conj_div, mul_comm, hv,
inner_product_space.conj_sym, hv] }
end
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single vector. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
(orthogonal_projection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = (⟪v, w⟫ / ∥v∥ ^ 2) • v :=
begin
by_cases hv : v = 0,
{ rw [hv, eq_orthogonal_projection_of_eq_submodule submodule.span_zero_singleton],
{ simp },
{ apply_instance } },
have hv' : ∥v∥ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.mpr hv),
have key : ((∥v∥ ^ 2 : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ∥v∥ ^ 2) • ↑(orthogonal_projection (𝕜 ∙ v) w)
= ((∥v∥ ^ 2 : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ⟪v, w⟫) • v,
{ simp [mul_smul, smul_orthogonal_projection_singleton 𝕜 w] },
convert key;
field_simp [hv']
end
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single unit vector. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_unit_singleton {v : E} (hv : ∥v∥ = 1) (w : E) :
(orthogonal_projection (𝕜 ∙ v) w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v :=
by { rw ← smul_orthogonal_projection_singleton 𝕜 w, simp [hv] }
end orthogonal_projection
/-- The subspace of vectors orthogonal to a given subspace. -/
def submodule.orthogonal : submodule 𝕜 E :=
{ carrier := {v | ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪u, v⟫ = 0},
zero_mem' := λ _ _, inner_zero_right,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy u hu, by rw [inner_add_right, hx u hu, hy u hu, add_zero],
smul_mem' := λ c x hx u hu, by rw [inner_smul_right, hx u hu, mul_zero] }
notation K`ᗮ`:1200 := submodule.orthogonal K
/-- When a vector is in `Kᗮ`. -/
lemma submodule.mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v ∈ Kᗮ ↔ ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 := iff.rfl
/-- When a vector is in `Kᗮ`, with the inner product the
other way round. -/
lemma submodule.mem_orthogonal' (v : E) : v ∈ Kᗮ ↔ ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 :=
by simp_rw [submodule.mem_orthogonal, inner_eq_zero_sym]
variables {K}
/-- A vector in `K` is orthogonal to one in `Kᗮ`. -/
lemma submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hu : u ∈ K) (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal v).1 hv u hu
/-- A vector in `Kᗮ` is orthogonal to one in `K`. -/
lemma submodule.inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hu : u ∈ K) (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [inner_eq_zero_sym]; exact submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal hu hv
/-- A vector in `(𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ` is orthogonal to `u`. -/
lemma inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal_singleton (u : E) {v : E} (hv : v ∈ (𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ) : ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 :=
submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal (submodule.mem_span_singleton_self u) hv
/-- A vector in `(𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ` is orthogonal to `u`. -/
lemma inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal_singleton (u : E) {v : E} (hv : v ∈ (𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ) : ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 :=
submodule.inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal (submodule.mem_span_singleton_self u) hv
variables (K)
/-- `K` and `Kᗮ` have trivial intersection. -/
lemma submodule.inf_orthogonal_eq_bot : K ⊓ Kᗮ = ⊥ :=
begin
rw submodule.eq_bot_iff,
intros x,
rw submodule.mem_inf,
exact λ ⟨hx, ho⟩, inner_self_eq_zero.1 (ho x hx)
end
/-- `K` and `Kᗮ` have trivial intersection. -/
lemma submodule.orthogonal_disjoint : disjoint K Kᗮ :=
by simp [disjoint_iff, K.inf_orthogonal_eq_bot]
/-- `Kᗮ` can be characterized as the intersection of the kernels of the operations of
inner product with each of the elements of `K`. -/
lemma orthogonal_eq_inter : Kᗮ = ⨅ v : K, (inner_right (v:E)).ker :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw le_infi_iff,
rintros ⟨v, hv⟩ w hw,
simpa using hw _ hv },
{ intros v hv w hw,
simp only [submodule.mem_infi] at hv,
exact hv ⟨w, hw⟩ }
end
/-- The orthogonal complement of any submodule `K` is closed. -/
lemma submodule.is_closed_orthogonal : is_closed (Kᗮ : set E) :=
begin
rw orthogonal_eq_inter K,
convert is_closed_Inter (λ v : K, (inner_right (v:E)).is_closed_ker),
simp
end
/-- In a complete space, the orthogonal complement of any submodule `K` is complete. -/
instance [complete_space E] : complete_space Kᗮ := K.is_closed_orthogonal.complete_space_coe
variables (𝕜 E)
/-- `submodule.orthogonal` gives a `galois_connection` between
`submodule 𝕜 E` and its `order_dual`. -/
lemma submodule.orthogonal_gc :
@galois_connection (submodule 𝕜 E) (order_dual $ submodule 𝕜 E) _ _
submodule.orthogonal submodule.orthogonal :=
λ K₁ K₂, ⟨λ h v hv u hu, submodule.inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal hv (h hu),
λ h v hv u hu, submodule.inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal hv (h hu)⟩
variables {𝕜 E}
/-- `submodule.orthogonal` reverses the `≤` ordering of two
subspaces. -/
lemma submodule.orthogonal_le {K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) : K₂ᗮ ≤ K₁ᗮ :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).monotone_l h
/-- `submodule.orthogonal.orthogonal` preserves the `≤` ordering of two
subspaces. -/
lemma submodule.orthogonal_orthogonal_monotone {K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) :
K₁ᗮᗮ ≤ K₂ᗮᗮ :=
submodule.orthogonal_le (submodule.orthogonal_le h)
/-- `K` is contained in `Kᗮᗮ`. -/
lemma submodule.le_orthogonal_orthogonal : K ≤ Kᗮᗮ := (submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).le_u_l _
/-- The inf of two orthogonal subspaces equals the subspace orthogonal
to the sup. -/
lemma submodule.inf_orthogonal (K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E) : K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ᗮ = (K₁ ⊔ K₂)ᗮ :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).l_sup.symm
/-- The inf of an indexed family of orthogonal subspaces equals the
subspace orthogonal to the sup. -/
lemma submodule.infi_orthogonal {ι : Type*} (K : ι → submodule 𝕜 E) : (⨅ i, (K i)ᗮ) = (supr K)ᗮ :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).l_supr.symm
/-- The inf of a set of orthogonal subspaces equals the subspace orthogonal to the sup. -/
lemma submodule.Inf_orthogonal (s : set $ submodule 𝕜 E) : (⨅ K ∈ s, Kᗮ) = (Sup s)ᗮ :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).l_Sup.symm
/-- If `K₁` is complete and contained in `K₂`, `K₁` and `K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂` span `K₂`. -/
lemma submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_is_complete {K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂)
(hc : is_complete (K₁ : set E)) : K₁ ⊔ (K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂) = K₂ :=
begin
ext x,
rw submodule.mem_sup,
rcases exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace K₁ hc x with ⟨v, hv, hvm⟩,
rw norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero K₁ hv at hvm,
split,
{ rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩,
exact K₂.add_mem (h hy) hz.2 },
{ exact λ hx, ⟨v, hv, x - v, ⟨(K₁.mem_orthogonal' _).2 hvm, K₂.sub_mem hx (h hv)⟩,
add_sub_cancel'_right _ _⟩ }
end
variables {K}
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `Kᗮ` span the whole space. -/
lemma submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_is_complete (h : is_complete (K : set E)) : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ :=
begin
convert submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_is_complete (le_top : K ≤ ⊤) h,
simp
end
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `Kᗮ` span the whole space. Version using `complete_space`. -/
lemma submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_complete_space [complete_space K] : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ :=
submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_is_complete (complete_space_coe_iff_is_complete.mp ‹_›)
variables (K)
/-- If `K` is complete, any `v` in `E` can be expressed as a sum of elements of `K` and `Kᗮ`. -/
lemma submodule.exists_sum_mem_mem_orthogonal [complete_space K] (v : E) :
∃ (y ∈ K) (z ∈ Kᗮ), v = y + z :=
begin
have h_mem : v ∈ K ⊔ Kᗮ := by simp [submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_complete_space],
obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, hyz⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.mp h_mem,
exact ⟨y, hy, z, hz, hyz.symm⟩
end
/-- If `K` is complete, then the orthogonal complement of its orthogonal complement is itself. -/
@[simp] lemma submodule.orthogonal_orthogonal [complete_space K] : Kᗮᗮ = K :=
begin
ext v,
split,
{ obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := K.exists_sum_mem_mem_orthogonal v,
intros hv,
have hz' : z = 0,
{ have hyz : ⟪z, y⟫ = 0 := by simp [hz y hy, inner_eq_zero_sym],
simpa [inner_add_right, hyz] using hv z hz },
simp [hy, hz'] },
{ intros hv w hw,
rw inner_eq_zero_sym,
exact hw v hv }
end
lemma submodule.orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure [complete_space E] :
Kᗮᗮ = K.topological_closure :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ convert submodule.orthogonal_orthogonal_monotone K.submodule_topological_closure,
haveI : complete_space K.topological_closure :=
K.is_closed_topological_closure.complete_space_coe,
rw K.topological_closure.orthogonal_orthogonal },
{ exact K.topological_closure_minimal K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal Kᗮ.is_closed_orthogonal }
end
variables {K}
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `Kᗮ` are complements of each other. -/
lemma submodule.is_compl_orthogonal_of_is_complete (h : is_complete (K : set E)) : is_compl K Kᗮ :=
⟨K.orthogonal_disjoint, le_of_eq (submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_is_complete h).symm⟩
@[simp] lemma submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot : (⊤ : submodule 𝕜 E)ᗮ = ⊥ :=
begin
ext,
rw [submodule.mem_bot, submodule.mem_orthogonal],
exact ⟨λ h, inner_self_eq_zero.mp (h x submodule.mem_top), by { rintro rfl, simp }⟩
end
@[simp] lemma submodule.bot_orthogonal_eq_top : (⊥ : submodule 𝕜 E)ᗮ = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot, eq_top_iff],
exact submodule.le_orthogonal_orthogonal ⊤
end
@[simp] lemma submodule.orthogonal_eq_bot_iff (hK : is_complete (K : set E)) :
Kᗮ = ⊥ ↔ K = ⊤ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, by { rintro rfl, exact submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot }⟩,
intro h,
have : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ := submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_is_complete hK,
rwa [h, sup_comm, bot_sup_eq] at this,
end
@[simp] lemma submodule.orthogonal_eq_top_iff : Kᗮ = ⊤ ↔ K = ⊥ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, by { rintro rfl, exact submodule.bot_orthogonal_eq_top }⟩,
intro h,
have : K ⊓ Kᗮ = ⊥ := K.orthogonal_disjoint.eq_bot,
rwa [h, inf_comm, top_inf_eq] at this
end
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
lemma eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal
[complete_space K] {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) (hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) :
(orthogonal_projection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv (λ w, inner_eq_zero_sym.mp ∘ (hvo w))
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
lemma eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal'
[complete_space K] {u v z : E} (hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) :
(orthogonal_projection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu])
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `K` of an element of `Kᗮ` is zero. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_complement_eq_zero
[complete_space K] {v : E} (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) :
orthogonal_projection K v = 0 :=
by { ext, convert eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal _ _; simp [hv] }
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `Kᗮ` of an element of `K` is zero. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_zero
[complete_space E] {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
orthogonal_projection Kᗮ v = 0 :=
orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_complement_eq_zero (K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hv)
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `(𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ` of `v` is zero. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_orthogonal_complement_singleton_eq_zero [complete_space E] (v : E) :
orthogonal_projection (𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ v = 0 :=
orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_zero
(submodule.mem_span_singleton_self v)
variables (K)
/-- In a complete space `E`, a vector splits as the sum of its orthogonal projections onto a
complete submodule `K` and onto the orthogonal complement of `K`.-/
lemma eq_sum_orthogonal_projection_self_orthogonal_complement
[complete_space E] [complete_space K] (w : E) :
w = (orthogonal_projection K w : E) + (orthogonal_projection Kᗮ w : E) :=
begin
obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, hwyz⟩ := K.exists_sum_mem_mem_orthogonal w,
convert hwyz,
{ exact eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal' hy hz hwyz },
{ rw add_comm at hwyz,
refine eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal' hz _ hwyz,
simp [hy] }
end
/-- In a complete space `E`, the projection maps onto a complete subspace `K` and its orthogonal
complement sum to the identity. -/
lemma id_eq_sum_orthogonal_projection_self_orthogonal_complement
[complete_space E] [complete_space K] :
continuous_linear_map.id 𝕜 E
= K.subtypeL.comp (orthogonal_projection K)
+ Kᗮ.subtypeL.comp (orthogonal_projection Kᗮ) :=
by { ext w, exact eq_sum_orthogonal_projection_self_orthogonal_complement K w }
open finite_dimensional
/-- Given a finite-dimensional subspace `K₂`, and a subspace `K₁`
containined in it, the dimensions of `K₁` and the intersection of its
orthogonal subspace with `K₂` add to that of `K₂`. -/
lemma submodule.finrank_add_inf_finrank_orthogonal {K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E}
[finite_dimensional 𝕜 K₂] (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) :
finrank 𝕜 K₁ + finrank 𝕜 (K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E) = finrank 𝕜 K₂ :=
begin
haveI := submodule.finite_dimensional_of_le h,
have hd := submodule.dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq K₁ (K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂),
rw [←inf_assoc, (submodule.orthogonal_disjoint K₁).eq_bot, bot_inf_eq, finrank_bot,
submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_is_complete h
(submodule.complete_of_finite_dimensional _)] at hd,
rw add_zero at hd,
exact hd.symm
end
/-- Given a finite-dimensional subspace `K₂`, and a subspace `K₁`
containined in it, the dimensions of `K₁` and the intersection of its
orthogonal subspace with `K₂` add to that of `K₂`. -/
lemma submodule.finrank_add_inf_finrank_orthogonal' {K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E}
[finite_dimensional 𝕜 K₂] (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) {n : ℕ} (h_dim : finrank 𝕜 K₁ + n = finrank 𝕜 K₂) :
finrank 𝕜 (K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E) = n :=
by { rw ← add_right_inj (finrank 𝕜 K₁),
simp [submodule.finrank_add_inf_finrank_orthogonal h, h_dim] }
/-- Given a finite-dimensional space `E` and subspace `K`, the dimensions of `K` and `Kᗮ` add to
that of `E`. -/
lemma submodule.finrank_add_finrank_orthogonal [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] {K : submodule 𝕜 E} :
finrank 𝕜 K + finrank 𝕜 Kᗮ = finrank 𝕜 E :=
begin
convert submodule.finrank_add_inf_finrank_orthogonal (le_top : K ≤ ⊤) using 1,
{ rw inf_top_eq },
{ simp }
end
/-- Given a finite-dimensional space `E` and subspace `K`, the dimensions of `K` and `Kᗮ` add to
that of `E`. -/
lemma submodule.finrank_add_finrank_orthogonal' [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] {K : submodule 𝕜 E} {n : ℕ}
(h_dim : finrank 𝕜 K + n = finrank 𝕜 E) :
finrank 𝕜 Kᗮ = n :=
by { rw ← add_right_inj (finrank 𝕜 K), simp [submodule.finrank_add_finrank_orthogonal, h_dim] }
local attribute [instance] finite_dimensional_of_finrank_eq_succ
/-- In a finite-dimensional inner product space, the dimension of the orthogonal complement of the
span of a nonzero vector is one less than the dimension of the space. -/
lemma finrank_orthogonal_span_singleton {n : ℕ} [_i : fact (finrank 𝕜 E = n + 1)]
{v : E} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
finrank 𝕜 (𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ = n :=
submodule.finrank_add_finrank_orthogonal' $ by simp [finrank_span_singleton hv, _i.elim, add_comm]
end orthogonal
section orthonormal_basis
/-! ### Existence of Hilbert basis, orthonormal basis, etc. -/
variables {𝕜 E} {v : set E}
open finite_dimensional submodule set
/-- An orthonormal set in an `inner_product_space` is maximal, if and only if the orthogonal
complement of its span is empty. -/
lemma maximal_orthonormal_iff_orthogonal_complement_eq_bot (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : v → E)) :
(∀ u ⊇ v, orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : u → E) → u = v) ↔ (span 𝕜 v)ᗮ = ⊥ :=
begin
rw submodule.eq_bot_iff,
split,
{ contrapose!,
-- ** direction 1: nonempty orthogonal complement implies nonmaximal
rintros ⟨x, hx', hx⟩,
-- take a nonzero vector and normalize it
let e := (∥x∥⁻¹ : 𝕜) • x,
have he : ∥e∥ = 1 := by simp [e, norm_smul_inv_norm hx],
have he' : e ∈ (span 𝕜 v)ᗮ := smul_mem' _ _ hx',
have he'' : e ∉ v,
{ intros hev,
have : e = 0,
{ have : e ∈ (span 𝕜 v) ⊓ (span 𝕜 v)ᗮ := ⟨subset_span hev, he'⟩,
simpa [(span 𝕜 v).inf_orthogonal_eq_bot] using this },
have : e ≠ 0 := hv.ne_zero ⟨e, hev⟩,
contradiction },
-- put this together with `v` to provide a candidate orthonormal basis for the whole space
refine ⟨v.insert e, v.subset_insert e, ⟨_, _⟩, (v.ne_insert_of_not_mem he'').symm⟩,
{ -- show that the elements of `v.insert e` have unit length
rintros ⟨a, ha'⟩,
cases eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert ha' with ha ha,
{ simp [ha, he] },
{ exact hv.1 ⟨a, ha⟩ } },
{ -- show that the elements of `v.insert e` are orthogonal
have h_end : ∀ a ∈ v, ⟪a, e⟫ = 0,
{ intros a ha,
exact he' a (submodule.subset_span ha) },
rintros ⟨a, ha'⟩,
cases eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert ha' with ha ha,
{ rintros ⟨b, hb'⟩ hab',
have hb : b ∈ v,
{ refine mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne hb' _,
intros hbe',
apply hab',
simp [ha, hbe'] },
rw inner_eq_zero_sym,
simpa [ha] using h_end b hb },
rintros ⟨b, hb'⟩ hab',
cases eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert hb' with hb hb,
{ simpa [hb] using h_end a ha },
have : (⟨a, ha⟩ : v) ≠ ⟨b, hb⟩,
{ intros hab'',
apply hab',
simpa using hab'' },
exact hv.2 this } },
{ -- ** direction 2: empty orthogonal complement implies maximal
simp only [subset.antisymm_iff],
rintros h u (huv : v ⊆ u) hu,
refine ⟨_, huv⟩,
intros x hxu,
refine ((mt (h x)) (hu.ne_zero ⟨x, hxu⟩)).imp_symm _,
intros hxv y hy,
have hxv' : (⟨x, hxu⟩ : u) ∉ (coe ⁻¹' v : set u) := by simp [huv, hxv],
obtain ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩ :
∃ l ∈ finsupp.supported 𝕜 𝕜 (coe ⁻¹' v : set u), (finsupp.total ↥u E 𝕜 coe) l = y,
{ rw ← finsupp.mem_span_iff_total,
simp [huv, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left, hy] },
exact hu.inner_finsupp_eq_zero hxv' hl }
end
/-- An orthonormal set in an `inner_product_space` is maximal, if and only if the closure of its
span is the whole space. -/
lemma maximal_orthonormal_iff_dense_span [complete_space E] (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : v → E)) :
(∀ u ⊇ v, orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : u → E) → u = v) ↔ (span 𝕜 v).topological_closure = ⊤ :=
by rw [maximal_orthonormal_iff_orthogonal_complement_eq_bot hv, ← submodule.orthogonal_eq_top_iff,
(span 𝕜 v).orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure]
/-- Any orthonormal subset can be extended to an orthonormal set whose span is dense. -/
lemma exists_subset_is_orthonormal_dense_span
[complete_space E] (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : v → E)) :
∃ u ⊇ v, orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : u → E) ∧ (span 𝕜 u).topological_closure = ⊤ :=
begin
obtain ⟨u, hus, hu, hu_max⟩ := exists_maximal_orthonormal hv,
rw maximal_orthonormal_iff_dense_span hu at hu_max,
exact ⟨u, hus, hu, hu_max⟩
end
variables (𝕜 E)
/-- An inner product space admits an orthonormal set whose span is dense. -/
lemma exists_is_orthonormal_dense_span [complete_space E] :
∃ u : set E, orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : u → E) ∧ (span 𝕜 u).topological_closure = ⊤ :=
let ⟨u, hus, hu, hu_max⟩ := exists_subset_is_orthonormal_dense_span (orthonormal_empty 𝕜 E) in
⟨u, hu, hu_max⟩
variables {𝕜 E}
/-- An orthonormal set in a finite-dimensional `inner_product_space` is maximal, if and only if it
is a basis. -/
lemma maximal_orthonormal_iff_basis_of_finite_dimensional
[finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : v → E)) :
(∀ u ⊇ v, orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : u → E) → u = v) ↔ ∃ b : basis v 𝕜 E, ⇑b = coe :=
begin
rw maximal_orthonormal_iff_orthogonal_complement_eq_bot hv,
have hv_compl : is_complete (span 𝕜 v : set E) := (span 𝕜 v).complete_of_finite_dimensional,
rw submodule.orthogonal_eq_bot_iff hv_compl,
have hv_coe : range (coe : v → E) = v := by simp,
split,
{ refine λ h, ⟨basis.mk hv.linear_independent _, basis.coe_mk _ _⟩,
convert h },
{ rintros ⟨h, coe_h⟩,
rw [← h.span_eq, coe_h, hv_coe] }
end
/-- In a finite-dimensional `inner_product_space`, any orthonormal subset can be extended to an
orthonormal basis. -/
lemma exists_subset_is_orthonormal_basis
[finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] (hv : orthonormal 𝕜 (coe : v → E)) :
∃ (u ⊇ v) (b : basis u 𝕜 E), orthonormal 𝕜 b ∧ ⇑b = coe :=
begin
obtain ⟨u, hus, hu, hu_max⟩ := exists_maximal_orthonormal hv,
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := (maximal_orthonormal_iff_basis_of_finite_dimensional hu).mp hu_max,
exact ⟨u, hus, b, by rwa hb, hb⟩
end
variables (𝕜 E)
/-- Index for an arbitrary orthonormal basis on a finite-dimensional `inner_product_space`. -/
def orthonormal_basis_index [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] : set E :=
classical.some (exists_subset_is_orthonormal_basis (orthonormal_empty 𝕜 E))
/-- A finite-dimensional `inner_product_space` has an orthonormal basis. -/
def orthonormal_basis [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] :
basis (orthonormal_basis_index 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E :=
(exists_subset_is_orthonormal_basis (orthonormal_empty 𝕜 E)).some_spec.some_spec.some
lemma orthonormal_basis_orthonormal [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] :
orthonormal 𝕜 (orthonormal_basis 𝕜 E) :=
(exists_subset_is_orthonormal_basis (orthonormal_empty 𝕜 E)).some_spec.some_spec.some_spec.1
@[simp] lemma coe_orthonormal_basis [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] :
⇑(orthonormal_basis 𝕜 E) = coe :=
(exists_subset_is_orthonormal_basis (orthonormal_empty 𝕜 E)).some_spec.some_spec.some_spec.2
instance [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] : fintype (orthonormal_basis_index 𝕜 E) :=
is_noetherian.fintype_basis_index (orthonormal_basis 𝕜 E)
variables {𝕜 E}
/-- An `n`-dimensional `inner_product_space` has an orthonormal basis indexed by `fin n`. -/
def fin_orthonormal_basis [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] {n : ℕ} (hn : finrank 𝕜 E = n) :
basis (fin n) 𝕜 E :=
have h : fintype.card (orthonormal_basis_index 𝕜 E) = n,
by rw [← finrank_eq_card_basis (orthonormal_basis 𝕜 E), hn],
(orthonormal_basis 𝕜 E).reindex (fintype.equiv_fin_of_card_eq h)
lemma fin_orthonormal_basis_orthonormal [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] {n : ℕ} (hn : finrank 𝕜 E = n) :
orthonormal 𝕜 (fin_orthonormal_basis hn) :=
suffices orthonormal 𝕜 (orthonormal_basis _ _ ∘ equiv.symm _),
by { simp only [fin_orthonormal_basis, basis.coe_reindex], assumption }, -- why doesn't simpa work?
(orthonormal_basis_orthonormal 𝕜 E).comp _ (equiv.injective _)
/-- Given a natural number `n` equal to the `finrank` of a finite-dimensional inner product space,
there exists an isometry from the space to `euclidean_space 𝕜 (fin n)`. -/
def linear_isometry_equiv.of_inner_product_space
[finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] {n : ℕ} (hn : finrank 𝕜 E = n) :
E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (euclidean_space 𝕜 (fin n)) :=
(fin_orthonormal_basis hn).isometry_euclidean_of_orthonormal (fin_orthonormal_basis_orthonormal hn)
local attribute [instance] finite_dimensional_of_finrank_eq_succ
/-- Given a natural number `n` one less than the `finrank` of a finite-dimensional inner product
space, there exists an isometry from the orthogonal complement of a nonzero singleton to
`euclidean_space 𝕜 (fin n)`. -/
def linear_isometry_equiv.from_orthogonal_span_singleton
(n : ℕ) [fact (finrank 𝕜 E = n + 1)] {v : E} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
(𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (euclidean_space 𝕜 (fin n)) :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_inner_product_space (finrank_orthogonal_span_singleton hv)
end orthonormal_basis
|
45a01891f1b5ca3a91c927a8573dea1358ee96b0 | bf532e3e865883a676110e756f800e0ddeb465be | /data/set/lattice.lean | 99e4f57043b6874cb27f759d1add609fca9bc843 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | aqjune/mathlib | da42a97d9e6670d2efaa7d2aa53ed3585dafc289 | f7977ff5a6bcf7e5c54eec908364ceb40dafc795 | refs/heads/master | 1,631,213,225,595 | 1,521,089,840,000 | 1,521,089,840,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,958 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-- QUESTION: can make the first argument in ∀ x ∈ a, ... implicit?
-/
import logic.basic data.set.basic tactic
import order.complete_boolean_algebra category.basic
import tactic.finish
open function tactic set lattice auto
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
namespace set
instance lattice_set : complete_lattice (set α) :=
{ lattice.complete_lattice .
le := (⊆),
le_refl := subset.refl,
le_trans := assume a b c, subset.trans,
le_antisymm := assume a b, subset.antisymm,
lt := λ x y, x ⊆ y ∧ ¬ y ⊆ x,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ x y, iff.refl _,
sup := (∪),
le_sup_left := subset_union_left,
le_sup_right := subset_union_right,
sup_le := assume a b c, union_subset,
inf := (∩),
inf_le_left := inter_subset_left,
inf_le_right := inter_subset_right,
le_inf := assume a b c, subset_inter,
top := {a | true },
le_top := assume s a h, trivial,
bot := ∅,
bot_le := assume s a, false.elim,
Sup := λs, {a | ∃ t ∈ s, a ∈ t },
le_Sup := assume s t t_in a a_in, ⟨t, ⟨t_in, a_in⟩⟩,
Sup_le := assume s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩, h t' t'_in a_in,
Inf := λs, {a | ∀ t ∈ s, a ∈ t },
le_Inf := assume s t h a a_in t' t'_in, h t' t'_in a_in,
Inf_le := assume s t t_in a h, h _ t_in }
instance : distrib_lattice (set α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := λ s t u x, or_and_distrib_left.2, ..set.lattice_set }
lemma subset.antisymm_iff {α : Type*} {s t : set α} : s = t ↔ (s ⊆ t ∧ t ⊆ s) :=
le_antisymm_iff
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : monotone (image f) :=
assume s t, assume h : s ⊆ t, image_subset _ h
/- union and intersection over a family of sets indexed by a type -/
/-- Indexed union of a family of sets -/
@[reducible] def Union (s : ι → set β) : set β := supr s
/-- Indexed intersection of a family of sets -/
@[reducible] def Inter (s : ι → set β) : set β := infi s
notation `⋃` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, Union f) := r
notation `⋂` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, Inter f) := r
@[simp] theorem mem_Union_eq (x : β) (s : ι → set β) : (x ∈ ⋃ i, s i) = (∃ i, x ∈ s i) :=
propext
⟨assume ⟨t, ⟨⟨a, (t_eq : t = s a)⟩, (h : x ∈ t)⟩⟩, ⟨a, t_eq ▸ h⟩,
assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨s a, ⟨⟨a, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩⟩
/- alternative proof: dsimp [Union, supr, Sup]; simp -/
-- TODO: more rewrite rules wrt forall / existentials and logical connectives
-- TODO: also eliminate ∃i, ... ∧ i = t ∧ ...
@[simp] theorem mem_Inter_eq (x : β) (s : ι → set β) : (x ∈ ⋂ i, s i) = (∀ i, x ∈ s i) :=
propext
⟨assume (h : ∀a ∈ {a : set β | ∃i, a = s i}, x ∈ a) a, h (s a) ⟨a, rfl⟩,
assume h t ⟨a, (eq : t = s a)⟩, eq.symm ▸ h a⟩
theorem Union_subset {s : ι → set β} {t : set β} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : (⋃ i, s i) ⊆ t :=
-- TODO: should be simpler when sets' order is based on lattices
@supr_le (set β) _ set.lattice_set _ _ h
theorem Union_subset_iff {α : Sort u} {s : α → set β} {t : set β} : (⋃ i, s i) ⊆ t ↔ (∀ i, s i ⊆ t):=
⟨assume h i, subset.trans (le_supr s _) h, Union_subset⟩
theorem mem_Inter {α : Sort u} {x : β} {s : α → set β} : (∀ i, x ∈ s i) → (x ∈ ⋂ i, s i) :=
assume h t ⟨a, (eq : t = s a)⟩, eq.symm ▸ h a
theorem subset_Inter {t : set β} {s : α → set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
-- TODO: should be simpler when sets' order is based on lattices
@le_infi (set β) _ set.lattice_set _ _ h
@[simp] -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem compl_Union (s : α → set β) : - (⋃ i, s i) = (⋂ i, - s i) :=
ext (λ x, by simp)
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem compl_Inter (s : α → set β) : -(⋂ i, s i) = (⋃ i, - s i) :=
ext (λ x, by simp [classical.not_forall])
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem Union_eq_comp_Inter_comp (s : α → set β) : (⋃ i, s i) = - (⋂ i, - s i) :=
by simp [compl_Inter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem Inter_eq_comp_Union_comp (s : α → set β) : (⋂ i, s i) = - (⋃ i, -s i) :=
by simp [compl_compl]
theorem inter_distrib_Union_left (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∩ (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
set.ext (by simp)
theorem inter_distrib_Union_right (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
set.ext (by simp)
-- classical
theorem union_distrib_Inter_left (s : set β) (t : α → set β) :
s ∪ (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
set.ext $ assume x, by simp [classical.forall_or_distrib_left]
/- bounded unions and intersections -/
theorem mem_bUnion {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
by simp; exact ⟨x, ⟨xs, ytx⟩⟩
theorem mem_bInter {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
by simp; assumption
theorem bUnion_subset {s : set α} {t : set β} {u : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, u x ⊆ t) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ⊆ t :=
show (⨆ x ∈ s, u x) ≤ t, -- TODO: should not be necessary when sets' order is based on lattices
from supr_le $ assume x, supr_le (h x)
theorem subset_bInter {s : set α} {t : set β} {u : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t ⊆ u x) :
t ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) :=
show t ≤ (⨅ x ∈ s, u x), -- TODO: should not be necessary when sets' order is based on lattices
from le_infi $ assume x, le_infi (h x)
theorem subset_Union {ι : Sort*} (u : ι → set α) (i : ι) : u i ⊆ (⋃i, u i) :=
show u i ≤ (⨆i, u i), from le_supr u i
theorem subset_bUnion_of_mem {s : set α} {u : α → set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) :=
show u x ≤ (⨆ x ∈ s, u x),
from le_supr_of_le x $ le_supr _ xs
theorem bInter_subset_of_mem {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
(⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ t x :=
show (⨅x ∈ s, t x) ≤ t x,
from infi_le_of_le x $ infi_le _ xs
theorem bUnion_subset_bUnion_left {s s' : set α} {t : α → set β}
(h : s ⊆ s') : (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s', t x) :=
bUnion_subset (λ x xs, subset_bUnion_of_mem (h xs))
theorem bInter_subset_bInter_left {s s' : set α} {t : α → set β}
(h : s' ⊆ s) : (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s', t x) :=
subset_bInter (λ x xs, bInter_subset_of_mem (h xs))
@[simp] theorem bInter_empty (u : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ (∅ : set α), u x) = univ :=
show (⨅x ∈ (∅ : set α), u x) = ⊤, -- simplifier should be able to rewrite x ∈ ∅ to false.
from infi_emptyset
@[simp] theorem bInter_univ (u : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x) = ⋂ x, u x :=
infi_univ
-- TODO(Jeremy): here is an artifact of the the encoding of bounded intersection:
-- without dsimp, the next theorem fails to type check, because there is a lambda
-- in a type that needs to be contracted. Using simp [eq_of_mem_singleton xa] also works.
@[simp] theorem bInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ ({a} : set α), s x) = s a :=
show (⨅ x ∈ ({a} : set α), s x) = s a, by simp
theorem bInter_union (s t : set α) (u : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x) = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ (⋂ x ∈ t, u x) :=
show (⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x) = (⨅ x ∈ s, u x) ⊓ (⨅ x ∈ t, u x),
from infi_union
-- TODO(Jeremy): simp [insert_eq, bInter_union] doesn't work
@[simp] theorem bInter_insert (a : α) (s : set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x) = t a ∩ (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) :=
begin rw insert_eq, simp [bInter_union] end
-- TODO(Jeremy): another example of where an annotation is needed
theorem bInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : set α), s x) = s a ∩ s b :=
by rw insert_of_has_insert; simp [inter_comm]
@[simp] theorem bUnion_empty (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ (∅ : set α), s x) = ∅ :=
supr_emptyset
@[simp] theorem bUnion_univ (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x) = ⋃ x, s x :=
supr_univ
@[simp] theorem bUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ ({a} : set α), s x) = s a :=
supr_singleton
theorem bUnion_union (s t : set α) (u : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x) = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ (⋃ x ∈ t, u x) :=
supr_union
-- TODO(Jeremy): once again, simp doesn't do it alone.
@[simp] theorem bUnion_insert (a : α) (s : set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x) = t a ∪ (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
begin rw [insert_eq], simp [bUnion_union] end
theorem bUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : set α), s x) = s a ∪ s b :=
by rw insert_of_has_insert; simp [union_comm]
/-- Intersection of a set of sets. -/
@[reducible] def sInter (S : set (set α)) : set α := Inf S
prefix `⋂₀`:110 := sInter
theorem mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : set α} {S : set (set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ⟨ht, hx⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sUnion_eq {x : α} {S : set (set α)} : x ∈ ⋃₀ S = (∃t ∈ S, x ∈ t) := rfl
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : set α} {S : set (set α)}
(hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∉ t :=
assume : x ∈ t,
have x ∈ ⋃₀ S, from mem_sUnion this ht,
show false, from hx this
theorem mem_sInter {x : α} {t : set α} {S : set (set α)} (h : ∀ t ∈ S, x ∈ t) : x ∈ ⋂₀ S := h
@[simp] theorem mem_sInter_eq {x : α} {S : set (set α)} : x ∈ ⋂₀ S = (∀ t ∈ S, x ∈ t) := rfl
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : (⋂₀ S) ⊆ t :=
Inf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ (⋃₀ S) :=
le_Sup tS
theorem sUnion_subset {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (h : ∀t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : (⋃₀ S) ⊆ t :=
Sup_le h
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : set (set α)} {t : set α} : (⋃₀ s) ⊆ t ↔ ∀t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h t' ht', subset.trans (subset_sUnion_of_mem ht') h, sUnion_subset⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (h : ∀t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ (⋂₀ S) :=
le_Inf h
@[simp] theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : set α) := Sup_empty
@[simp] theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : set α) := Inf_empty
@[simp] theorem sUnion_singleton (s : set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s := Sup_singleton
@[simp] theorem sInter_singleton (s : set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s := Inf_singleton
theorem sUnion_union (S T : set (set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T := Sup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : set (set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T := Inf_union
@[simp] theorem sUnion_insert (s : set α) (T : set (set α)) : ⋃₀ (insert s T) = s ∪ ⋃₀ T := Sup_insert
@[simp] theorem sInter_insert (s : set α) (T : set (set α)) : ⋂₀ (insert s T) = s ∩ ⋂₀ T := Inf_insert
@[simp] theorem sUnion_image (f : α → set β) (s : set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x := Sup_image
@[simp] theorem sInter_image (f : α → set β) (s : set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x := Inf_image
theorem compl_sUnion (S : set (set α)) :
- ⋃₀ S = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
set.ext $ assume x,
⟨assume : ¬ (∃s∈S, x ∈ s), assume s h,
match s, h with
._, ⟨t, hs, rfl⟩ := assume h, this ⟨t, hs, h⟩
end,
assume : ∀s, s ∈ compl '' S → x ∈ s,
assume ⟨t, tS, xt⟩, this (compl t) (mem_image_of_mem _ tS) xt⟩
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : set (set α)) :
⋃₀ S = - ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
by rw [←compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : set (set α)) :
- ⋂₀ S = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) :=
by rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_comp_sUnion_compl (S : set (set α)) :
⋂₀ S = -(⋃₀ (compl '' S)) :=
by rw [←compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : set α} {S : set (set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) :
s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty
begin rw ←h, apply inter_subset_inter_left, apply subset_sUnion_of_mem hs end
theorem Union_eq_sUnion_image (s : α → set β) : (⋃ i, s i) = ⋃₀ (range s) :=
by rw [← image_univ, sUnion_image]; simp
theorem Inter_eq_sInter_image {α I : Type} (s : I → set α) : (⋂ i, s i) = ⋂₀ (range s) :=
by rw [← image_univ, sInter_image]; simp
lemma sUnion_mono {s t : set (set α)} (h : s ⊆ t) : (⋃₀ s) ⊆ (⋃₀ t) :=
sUnion_subset $ assume t' ht', subset_sUnion_of_mem $ h ht'
lemma Union_subset_Union {s t : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, s i ⊆ t i) : (⋃i, s i) ⊆ (⋃i, t i) :=
@supr_le_supr (set α) ι _ s t h
lemma Union_subset_Union2 {ι₂ : Sort*} {s : ι → set α} {t : ι₂ → set α} (h : ∀i, ∃j, s i ⊆ t j) :
(⋃i, s i) ⊆ (⋃i, t i) :=
@supr_le_supr2 (set α) ι ι₂ _ s t h
lemma Union_subset_Union_const {ι₂ : Sort x} {s : set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : (⋃ i:ι, s) ⊆ (⋃ j:ι₂, s) :=
@supr_le_supr_const (set α) ι ι₂ _ s h
lemma sUnion_eq_Union {s : set (set α)} : (⋃₀ s) = (⋃ (i : set α) (h : i ∈ s), i) :=
set.ext $ by simp
lemma sUnion_eq_Union' {s : set (set α)} : (⋃₀ s) = (⋃ (i : s), i) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp; unfold_coes; simp
instance : complete_boolean_algebra (set α) :=
{ neg := compl,
sub := (\),
inf_neg_eq_bot := assume s, ext $ assume x, ⟨assume ⟨h, nh⟩, nh h, false.elim⟩,
sup_neg_eq_top := assume s, ext $ assume x, ⟨assume h, trivial, assume _, classical.em $ x ∈ s⟩,
le_sup_inf := distrib_lattice.le_sup_inf,
sub_eq := assume x y, rfl,
infi_sup_le_sup_Inf := assume s t x, show x ∈ (⋂ b ∈ t, s ∪ b) → x ∈ s ∪ (⋂₀ t),
by simp; exact assume h,
or.imp_right
(assume hn : x ∉ s, assume i hi, or.resolve_left (h i hi) hn)
(classical.em $ x ∈ s),
inf_Sup_le_supr_inf := assume s t x, show x ∈ s ∩ (⋃₀ t) → x ∈ (⋃ b ∈ t, s ∩ b),
by simp [-and_imp, and.left_comm],
..set.lattice_set }
theorem union_sdiff_same {a b : set α} : a ∪ (b \ a) = a ∪ b :=
lattice.sup_sub_same
theorem sdiff_union_same {a b : set α} : (b \ a) ∪ a = a ∪ b :=
by rw [union_comm, union_sdiff_same]
theorem sdiff_inter_same {a b : set α} : (b \ a) ∩ a = ∅ :=
set.ext $ by simp [iff_def] {contextual:=tt}
theorem sdiff_subset_sdiff {a b c d : set α} : a ⊆ c → d ⊆ b → a \ b ⊆ c \ d :=
@lattice.sub_le_sub (set α) _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem union_same_compl {a : set α} : a ∪ (-a) = univ :=
sup_neg_eq_top
@[simp] theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_same {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∉ s) : s \ {a} = s :=
sub_eq_left $ eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ assume x ⟨ht, ha⟩,
begin simp at ha, simp [ha] at ht, exact h ht end
@[simp] theorem insert_sdiff_singleton {a : α} {s : set α} :
insert a (s \ {a}) = insert a s :=
by simp [insert_eq, union_sdiff_same]
lemma compl_subset_compl_iff_subset {α : Type u} {x y : set α} : - y ⊆ - x ↔ x ⊆ y :=
@neg_le_neg_iff_le (set α) _ _ _
lemma union_of_subset_right {a b : set α} (h : a ⊆ b) : a ∪ b = b :=
sup_of_le_right h
section sdiff
variables {s s₁ s₂ : set α}
@[simp] lemma sdiff_empty : s \ ∅ = s :=
set.ext $ by simp
lemma sdiff_eq: s₁ \ s₂ = s₁ ∩ -s₂ := rfl
lemma union_sdiff_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \ s₂ = s₁ \ s₂ :=
set.ext $ by simp [or_and_distrib_right]
lemma union_sdiff_right : (s₂ ∪ s₁) \ s₂ = s₁ \ s₂ :=
set.ext $ by simp [or_and_distrib_right]
end sdiff
section
variables {p : Prop} {μ : p → set α}
@[simp] lemma Inter_pos (hp : p) : (⋂h:p, μ h) = μ hp := infi_pos hp
@[simp] lemma Inter_neg (hp : ¬ p) : (⋂h:p, μ h) = univ := infi_neg hp
@[simp] lemma Union_pos (hp : p) : (⋃h:p, μ h) = μ hp := supr_pos hp
@[simp] lemma Union_neg (hp : ¬ p) : (⋃h:p, μ h) = ∅ := supr_neg hp
@[simp] lemma Union_empty {ι : Sort*} : (⋃i:ι, ∅:set α) = ∅ := supr_bot
@[simp] lemma Inter_univ {ι : Sort*} : (⋂i:ι, univ:set α) = univ := infi_top
end
section image
@[congr]
lemma image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : set α} (h : ∀a∈s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s :=
set.ext $ assume x, ⟨
assume ⟨a, ha, eq⟩, ⟨a, ha, eq ▸ (h _ ha).symm⟩,
assume ⟨a, ha, eq⟩, ⟨a, ha, eq ▸ h _ ha⟩⟩
lemma image_Union {f : α → β} {s : ι → set α} : f '' (⋃ i, s i) = (⋃i, f '' s i) :=
begin
apply set.ext, intro x,
simp [image, exists_and_distrib_right.symm, -exists_and_distrib_right],
exact exists_swap
end
lemma univ_subtype {p : α → Prop} : (univ : set (subtype p)) = (⋃x (h : p x), {⟨x, h⟩}) :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨x, h⟩, by simp [h]
lemma subtype_val_image {p : α → Prop} {s : set (subtype p)} :
subtype.val '' s = {x | ∃h : p x, (⟨x, h⟩ : subtype p) ∈ s} :=
set.ext $ assume a,
⟨assume ⟨⟨a', ha'⟩, in_s, h_eq⟩, h_eq ▸ ⟨ha', in_s⟩,
assume ⟨ha, in_s⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, in_s, rfl⟩⟩
end image
section range
lemma subtype_val_range {p : α → Prop} :
range (@subtype.val _ p) = {x | p x} :=
by rw ← image_univ; simp [-image_univ, subtype_val_image]
end range
section preimage
theorem monotone_preimage {f : α → β} : monotone (preimage f) := assume a b h, preimage_mono h
@[simp] theorem preimage_Union {ι : Sort w} {f : α → β} {s : ι → set β} :
preimage f (⋃i, s i) = (⋃i, preimage f (s i)) :=
set.ext $ by simp [preimage]
@[simp] theorem preimage_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : set (set β)} :
preimage f (⋃₀ s) = (⋃t ∈ s, preimage f t) :=
set.ext $ by simp [preimage]
end preimage
theorem monotone_prod [preorder α] {f : α → set β} {g : α → set γ}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λx, set.prod (f x) (g x)) :=
assume a b h, prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
instance : monad set :=
{ monad .
pure := λ(α : Type u) a, {a},
bind := λ(α β : Type u) s f, ⋃i∈s, f i,
map := λ(α β : Type u), set.image,
pure_bind := assume α β x f, by simp,
bind_assoc := assume α β γ s f g, set.ext $ assume a,
by simp [exists_and_distrib_right.symm, -exists_and_distrib_right,
exists_and_distrib_left.symm, -exists_and_distrib_left, and_assoc];
exact exists_swap,
id_map := assume α, functor.id_map,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := assume α β f s, set.ext $ by simp [set.image, eq_comm] }
section monad
variables {α' β' : Type u} {s : set α'} {f : α' → set β'} {g : set (α' → β')}
@[simp] lemma bind_def : s >>= f = ⋃i∈s, f i := rfl
lemma fmap_eq_image : f <$> s = f '' s := rfl
lemma mem_seq_iff {b : β'} : b ∈ (g <*> s) ↔ (∃(f' : α' → β'), ∃a∈s, f' ∈ g ∧ b = f' a) :=
begin
simp [seq_eq_bind_map],
apply exists_congr,
intro f',
exact ⟨assume ⟨hf', a, ha, h_eq⟩, ⟨a, ha, hf', h_eq.symm⟩,
assume ⟨a, ha, hf', h_eq⟩, ⟨hf', a, ha, h_eq.symm⟩⟩
end
end monad
end set
/- disjoint sets -/
section disjoint
variable [semilattice_inf_bot α]
/-- Two elements of a lattice are disjoint if their inf is the bottom element.
(This generalizes disjoint sets, viewed as members of the subset lattice.) -/
def disjoint (a b : α) : Prop := a ⊓ b = ⊥
theorem disjoint_symm {a b : α} : disjoint a b → disjoint b a :=
assume : a ⊓ b = ⊥, show b ⊓ a = ⊥, from this ▸ inf_comm
theorem disjoint_bot_left {a : α} : disjoint ⊥ a := bot_inf_eq
theorem disjoint_bot_right {a : α} : disjoint a ⊥ := inf_bot_eq
end disjoint
|
867d3e85f6a890b43307a2f1473374bf557ffc20 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/geometry/manifold/bump_function.lean | 28569c76bf5079e24ae644d28f0e32d56faa0f40 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,448 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.calculus.specific_functions
import geometry.manifold.times_cont_mdiff
/-!
# Smooth bump functions on a smooth manifold
In this file we define `smooth_bump_function I c` to be a bundled smooth "bump" function centered at
`c`. It is a structure that consists of two real numbers `0 < r < R` with small enough `R`. We
define a coercion to function for this type, and for `f : smooth_bump_function I c`, the function
`⇑f` written in the extended chart at `c` has the following properties:
* `f x = 1` in the closed euclidean ball of radius `f.r` centered at `c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the euclidean ball of radius `f.R` centered at `c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The actual statements involve (pre)images under `ext_chart_at I f` and are given as lemmas in the
`smooth_bump_function` namespace.
## Tags
manifold, smooth bump function
-/
universes uE uF uH uM
variables
{E : Type uE} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [finite_dimensional ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [topological_space H] (I : model_with_corners ℝ E H)
{M : Type uM} [topological_space M] [charted_space H M] [smooth_manifold_with_corners I M]
open function filter finite_dimensional set
open_locale topological_space manifold classical filter big_operators
noncomputable theory
/-!
### Smooth bump function
In this section we define a structure for a bundled smooth bump function and prove its properties.
-/
/-- Given a smooth manifold modelled on a finite dimensional space `E`,
`f : smooth_bump_function I M` is a smooth function on `M` such that in the extended chart `e` at
`f.c`:
* `f x = 1` in the closed euclidean ball of radius `f.r` centered at `f.c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the euclidean ball of radius `f.R` centered at `f.c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The structure contains data required to construct a function with these properties. The function is
available as `⇑f` or `f x`. Formal statements of the properties listed above involve some
(pre)images under `ext_chart_at I f.c` and are given as lemmas in the `smooth_bump_function`
namespace. -/
structure smooth_bump_function (c : M) extends times_cont_diff_bump (ext_chart_at I c c) :=
(closed_ball_subset :
(euclidean.closed_ball (ext_chart_at I c c) R) ∩ range I ⊆ (ext_chart_at I c).target)
variable {M}
namespace smooth_bump_function
open euclidean (renaming dist -> eudist)
variables {c : M} (f : smooth_bump_function I c) {x : M} {I}
/-- The function defined by `f : smooth_bump_function c`. Use automatic coercion to function
instead. -/
def to_fun : M → ℝ :=
indicator (chart_at H c).source (f.to_times_cont_diff_bump ∘ ext_chart_at I c)
instance : has_coe_to_fun (smooth_bump_function I c) (λ _, M → ℝ) := ⟨to_fun⟩
lemma coe_def :
⇑f = indicator (chart_at H c).source (f.to_times_cont_diff_bump ∘ ext_chart_at I c) :=
rfl
lemma R_pos : 0 < f.R := f.to_times_cont_diff_bump.R_pos
lemma ball_subset :
ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I ⊆ (ext_chart_at I c).target :=
subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closed_ball) f.closed_ball_subset
lemma eq_on_source :
eq_on f (f.to_times_cont_diff_bump ∘ ext_chart_at I c) (chart_at H c).source :=
eq_on_indicator
lemma eventually_eq_of_mem_source (hx : x ∈ (chart_at H c).source) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f.to_times_cont_diff_bump ∘ ext_chart_at I c :=
f.eq_on_source.eventually_eq_of_mem $ is_open.mem_nhds (chart_at H c).open_source hx
lemma one_of_dist_le (hs : x ∈ (chart_at H c).source)
(hd : eudist (ext_chart_at I c x) (ext_chart_at I c c) ≤ f.r) :
f x = 1 :=
by simp only [f.eq_on_source hs, (∘), f.to_times_cont_diff_bump.one_of_mem_closed_ball hd]
lemma support_eq_inter_preimage :
support f =
(chart_at H c).source ∩ (ext_chart_at I c ⁻¹' ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R) :=
by rw [coe_def, support_indicator, (∘), support_comp_eq_preimage, ← ext_chart_at_source I,
← (ext_chart_at I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq',
← (ext_chart_at I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', f.to_times_cont_diff_bump.support_eq]
lemma open_support : is_open (support f) :=
by { rw support_eq_inter_preimage, exact ext_chart_preimage_open_of_open I c is_open_ball }
lemma support_eq_symm_image :
support f = (ext_chart_at I c).symm '' (ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I) :=
begin
rw [f.support_eq_inter_preimage, ← ext_chart_at_source I,
← (ext_chart_at I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', inter_comm],
congr' 1 with y,
exact and.congr_right_iff.2
(λ hy, ⟨λ h, ext_chart_at_target_subset_range _ _ h, λ h, f.ball_subset ⟨hy, h⟩⟩)
end
lemma support_subset_source : support f ⊆ (chart_at H c).source :=
by { rw [f.support_eq_inter_preimage, ← ext_chart_at_source I], exact inter_subset_left _ _ }
lemma image_eq_inter_preimage_of_subset_support {s : set M} (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
ext_chart_at I c '' s =
closed_ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I ∩ (ext_chart_at I c).symm ⁻¹' s :=
begin
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← ext_chart_at_source I,
← image_subset_iff] at hs,
cases hs with hse hsf,
apply subset.antisymm,
{ refine subset_inter (subset_inter (subset.trans hsf ball_subset_closed_ball) _) _,
{ rintro _ ⟨x, -, rfl⟩, exact mem_range_self _ },
{ rw [(ext_chart_at I c).image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hse],
exact inter_subset_right _ _ } },
{ refine subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ f.closed_ball_subset) _,
rw [(ext_chart_at I c).image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hse] }
end
lemma mem_Icc : f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
begin
have : f x = 0 ∨ f x = _, from indicator_eq_zero_or_self _ _ _,
cases this; rw this,
exacts [left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one,
⟨f.to_times_cont_diff_bump.nonneg, f.to_times_cont_diff_bump.le_one⟩]
end
lemma nonneg : 0 ≤ f x := f.mem_Icc.1
lemma le_one : f x ≤ 1 := f.mem_Icc.2
lemma eventually_eq_one_of_dist_lt (hs : x ∈ (chart_at H c).source)
(hd : eudist (ext_chart_at I c x) (ext_chart_at I c c) < f.r) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 :=
begin
filter_upwards [is_open.mem_nhds (ext_chart_preimage_open_of_open I c is_open_ball) ⟨hs, hd⟩],
rintro z ⟨hzs, hzd : _ < _⟩,
exact f.one_of_dist_le hzs hzd.le
end
lemma eventually_eq_one : f =ᶠ[𝓝 c] 1 :=
f.eventually_eq_one_of_dist_lt (mem_chart_source _ _) $
by { rw [euclidean.dist, dist_self], exact f.r_pos }
@[simp] lemma eq_one : f c = 1 := f.eventually_eq_one.eq_of_nhds
lemma support_mem_nhds : support f ∈ 𝓝 c :=
f.eventually_eq_one.mono $ λ x hx, by { rw hx, exact one_ne_zero }
lemma closure_support_mem_nhds : closure (support f) ∈ 𝓝 c :=
mem_of_superset f.support_mem_nhds subset_closure
lemma c_mem_support : c ∈ support f := mem_of_mem_nhds f.support_mem_nhds
lemma nonempty_support : (support f).nonempty := ⟨c, f.c_mem_support⟩
lemma compact_symm_image_closed_ball :
is_compact ((ext_chart_at I c).symm '' (closed_ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I)) :=
(euclidean.is_compact_closed_ball.inter_right I.closed_range).image_of_continuous_on $
(ext_chart_at_continuous_on_symm _ _).mono f.closed_ball_subset
/-- Given a smooth bump function `f : smooth_bump_function I c`, the closed ball of radius `f.R` is
known to include the support of `f`. These closed balls (in the model normed space `E`) intersected
with `set.range I` form a basis of `𝓝[range I] (ext_chart_at I c c)`. -/
lemma nhds_within_range_basis :
(𝓝[range I] (ext_chart_at I c c)).has_basis (λ f : smooth_bump_function I c, true)
(λ f, closed_ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I) :=
begin
refine ((nhds_within_has_basis euclidean.nhds_basis_closed_ball _).restrict_subset
(ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within _ _)).to_has_basis' _ _,
{ rintro R ⟨hR0, hsub⟩,
exact ⟨⟨⟨⟨R / 2, R, half_pos hR0, half_lt_self hR0⟩⟩, hsub⟩, trivial, subset.rfl⟩ },
{ exact λ f _, inter_mem (mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds $ closed_ball_mem_nhds f.R_pos)
self_mem_nhds_within }
end
lemma closed_image_of_closed {s : set M} (hsc : is_closed s) (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
is_closed (ext_chart_at I c '' s) :=
begin
rw f.image_eq_inter_preimage_of_subset_support hs,
refine continuous_on.preimage_closed_of_closed
((ext_chart_continuous_on_symm _ _).mono f.closed_ball_subset) _ hsc,
exact is_closed.inter is_closed_closed_ball I.closed_range
end
/-- If `f` is a smooth bump function and `s` closed subset of the support of `f` (i.e., of the open
ball of radius `f.R`), then there exists `0 < r < f.R` such that `s` is a subset of the open ball of
radius `r`. Formally, `s ⊆ e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (ball (e c) r)`, where `e = ext_chart_at I c`. -/
lemma exists_r_pos_lt_subset_ball {s : set M} (hsc : is_closed s) (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
∃ r (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.R), s ⊆
(chart_at H c).source ∩ ext_chart_at I c ⁻¹' (ball (ext_chart_at I c c) r) :=
begin
set e := ext_chart_at I c,
have : is_closed (e '' s) := f.closed_image_of_closed hsc hs,
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← image_subset_iff] at hs,
rcases euclidean.exists_pos_lt_subset_ball f.R_pos this hs.2 with ⟨r, hrR, hr⟩,
exact ⟨r, hrR, subset_inter hs.1 (image_subset_iff.1 hr)⟩
end
/-- Replace `r` with another value in the interval `(0, f.R)`. -/
def update_r (r : ℝ) (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.R) : smooth_bump_function I c :=
⟨⟨⟨r, f.R, hr.1, hr.2⟩⟩, f.closed_ball_subset⟩
@[simp] lemma update_r_R {r : ℝ} (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.R) : (f.update_r r hr).R = f.R := rfl
@[simp] lemma update_r_r {r : ℝ} (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.R) : (f.update_r r hr).r = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma support_update_r {r : ℝ} (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.R) :
support (f.update_r r hr) = support f :=
by simp only [support_eq_inter_preimage, update_r_R]
instance : inhabited (smooth_bump_function I c) :=
classical.inhabited_of_nonempty nhds_within_range_basis.nonempty
variables [t2_space M]
lemma closed_symm_image_closed_ball :
is_closed ((ext_chart_at I c).symm '' (closed_ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I)) :=
f.compact_symm_image_closed_ball.is_closed
lemma closure_support_subset_symm_image_closed_ball :
closure (support f) ⊆
(ext_chart_at I c).symm '' (closed_ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I) :=
begin
rw support_eq_symm_image,
exact closure_minimal (image_subset _ $ inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closed_ball)
f.closed_symm_image_closed_ball
end
lemma closure_support_subset_ext_chart_at_source :
closure (support f) ⊆ (ext_chart_at I c).source :=
calc closure (support f)
⊆ (ext_chart_at I c).symm '' (closed_ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I) :
f.closure_support_subset_symm_image_closed_ball
... ⊆ (ext_chart_at I c).symm '' (ext_chart_at I c).target :
image_subset _ f.closed_ball_subset
... = (ext_chart_at I c).source :
(ext_chart_at I c).symm_image_target_eq_source
lemma closure_support_subset_chart_at_source :
closure (support f) ⊆ (chart_at H c).source :=
by simpa only [ext_chart_at_source] using f.closure_support_subset_ext_chart_at_source
lemma compact_closure_support : is_compact (closure $ support f) :=
compact_of_is_closed_subset f.compact_symm_image_closed_ball is_closed_closure
f.closure_support_subset_symm_image_closed_ball
variables (I c)
/-- The closures of supports of smooth bump functions centered at `c` form a basis of `𝓝 c`.
In other words, each of these closures is a neighborhood of `c` and each neighborhood of `c`
includes `closure (support f)` for some `f : smooth_bump_function I c`. -/
lemma nhds_basis_closure_support :
(𝓝 c).has_basis (λ f : smooth_bump_function I c, true) (λ f, closure $ support f) :=
begin
have : (𝓝 c).has_basis (λ f : smooth_bump_function I c, true)
(λ f, (ext_chart_at I c).symm '' (closed_ball (ext_chart_at I c c) f.R ∩ range I)),
{ rw [← ext_chart_at_symm_map_nhds_within_range I c],
exact nhds_within_range_basis.map _ },
refine this.to_has_basis' (λ f hf, ⟨f, trivial, f.closure_support_subset_symm_image_closed_ball⟩)
(λ f _, f.closure_support_mem_nhds),
end
variable {c}
/-- Given `s ∈ 𝓝 c`, the supports of smooth bump functions `f : smooth_bump_function I c` such that
`closure (support f) ⊆ s` form a basis of `𝓝 c`. In other words, each of these supports is a
neighborhood of `c` and each neighborhood of `c` includes `support f` for some `f :
smooth_bump_function I c` such that `closure (support f) ⊆ s`. -/
lemma nhds_basis_support {s : set M} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 c) :
(𝓝 c).has_basis (λ f : smooth_bump_function I c, closure (support f) ⊆ s) (λ f, support f) :=
((nhds_basis_closure_support I c).restrict_subset hs).to_has_basis'
(λ f hf, ⟨f, hf.2, subset_closure⟩) (λ f hf, f.support_mem_nhds)
variables [smooth_manifold_with_corners I M] {I}
/-- A smooth bump function is infinitely smooth. -/
protected lemma smooth : smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) f :=
begin
refine times_cont_mdiff_of_support (λ x hx, _),
have : x ∈ (chart_at H c).source := f.closure_support_subset_chart_at_source hx,
refine times_cont_mdiff_at.congr_of_eventually_eq _
(f.eq_on_source.eventually_eq_of_mem $ is_open.mem_nhds (chart_at _ _).open_source this),
exact f.to_times_cont_diff_bump.times_cont_diff_at.times_cont_mdiff_at.comp _
(times_cont_mdiff_at_ext_chart_at' this)
end
protected lemma smooth_at {x} : smooth_at I 𝓘(ℝ) f x := f.smooth.smooth_at
protected lemma continuous : continuous f := f.smooth.continuous
/-- If `f : smooth_bump_function I c` is a smooth bump function and `g : M → G` is a function smooth
on the source of the chart at `c`, then `f • g` is smooth on the whole manifold. -/
lemma smooth_smul {G} [normed_group G] [normed_space ℝ G]
{g : M → G} (hg : smooth_on I 𝓘(ℝ, G) g (chart_at H c).source) :
smooth I 𝓘(ℝ, G) (λ x, f x • g x) :=
begin
apply times_cont_mdiff_of_support (λ x hx, _),
have : x ∈ (chart_at H c).source,
calc x ∈ closure (support (λ x, f x • g x)) : hx
... ⊆ closure (support f) : closure_mono (support_smul_subset_left _ _)
... ⊆ (chart_at _ c).source : f.closure_support_subset_chart_at_source,
exact f.smooth_at.smul ((hg _ this).times_cont_mdiff_at $
is_open.mem_nhds (chart_at _ _).open_source this)
end
end smooth_bump_function
|
b07cdb33b038bf044bb45d4dd13acabf8d069b11 | b00eb947a9c4141624aa8919e94ce6dcd249ed70 | /tests/lean/run/inductive1.lean | 8b6dbcf8ba08514eadb80e4e503d210fcc6802fa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/lean4-old | a4129a041af2d4d12afb3a8d4deedabde727719b | ee51cdfaf63ee313c914d83264f91f414a0e3b6e | refs/heads/master | 1,683,628,606,745 | 1,622,651,300,000 | 1,622,654,405,000 | 142,608,821 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,629 | lean | inductive L1.{u} (α : Type u)
| nil
| cons : α → L1 α → L1 α
#check L1
#check @L1.cons
inductive L2.{u} (α : Type u)
| nil
| cons (head : α) (tail : L2 α)
#check @L2.cons
universes u v
variable (α : Type u)
inductive A (β : Type v)
| nil {}
| protected cons : α → β → A β → A β
#check @A.cons
#check A.nil Nat Bool
mutual
inductive isEven : Nat → Prop
| z : isEven 0
| s (n : Nat) : isOdd n → isEven (n+1)
inductive isOdd : Nat → Prop
| s (n : Nat) : isEven n → isOdd (n+1)
end
#check isEven
#check isOdd.s
#check @isEven.rec
inductive V (α : Type _) : Nat → Type _
| nil : V α 0
| cons {n : Nat} : α → V α n → V α (n+1)
#check @V.nil
#check @V.cons
#check @V.rec
#check @V.noConfusion
#check @V.brecOn
#check @V.binductionOn
#check @V.casesOn
#check @V.recOn
#check @V.below
class inductive Dec (p : Prop) : Type
| isTrue (h : p)
| isFalse (h : Not p)
instance tst : Dec True :=
Dec.isTrue True.intro
#check tst
variable (β : Type _)
inductive T1
| mk : β → β → T1
#check @T1.mk
inductive MyEq {α : Type} (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : MyEq a a
#check @MyEq.refl
inductive ListLast {α : Type u} : List α → Type u
| empty : ListLast []
| nonEmpty : (as : List α) → (a : α) → ListLast (as ++ [a])
-- make sure to instantiate mvars in constructors
inductive Test : Nat → Type
| mk : Test ((fun n => n.succ) Nat.zero)
inductive SortedMap {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [LT α] : List (α × β) → Prop
| nil : SortedMap []
| cons : ∀ (k : α) (v : β) (l : List (α × β)),
SortedMap l →
SortedMap ((k,v)::l)
|
8837044659a7a5eaab1817e33d107fc0843145d9 | 07c6143268cfb72beccd1cc35735d424ebcb187b | /src/topology/metric_space/gromov_hausdorff.lean | ed0a2413ca9643b98934aac83e39e555dc76baee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | khoek/mathlib | bc49a842910af13a3c372748310e86467d1dc766 | aa55f8b50354b3e11ba64792dcb06cccb2d8ee28 | refs/heads/master | 1,588,232,063,837 | 1,587,304,803,000 | 1,587,304,803,000 | 176,688,517 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,553,070,585,000 | 1,553,070,585,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 55,777 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.metric_space.closeds set_theory.cardinal topology.metric_space.gromov_hausdorff_realized
topology.metric_space.completion
/-!
# Gromov-Hausdorff distance
This file defines the Gromov-Hausdorff distance on the space of nonempty compact metric spaces
up to isometry.
We introduce the space of all nonempty compact metric spaces, up to isometry,
called `GH_space`, and endow it with a metric space structure. The distance,
known as the Gromov-Hausdorff distance, is defined as follows: given two
nonempty compact spaces `X` and `Y`, their distance is the minimum Hausdorff distance
between all possible isometric embeddings of `X` and `Y` in all metric spaces.
To define properly the Gromov-Hausdorff space, we consider the non-empty
compact subsets of `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` up to isometry, which is a well-defined type,
and define the distance as the infimum of the Hausdorff distance over all
embeddings in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`. We prove that this coincides with the previous description,
as all separable metric spaces embed isometrically into `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, through an
embedding called the Kuratowski embedding.
To prove that we have a distance, we should show that if spaces can be coupled
to be arbitrarily close, then they are isometric. More generally, the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance is realized, i.e., there is a coupling for which the Hausdorff distance
is exactly the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. This follows from a compactness
argument, essentially following from Arzela-Ascoli.
## Main results
We prove the most important properties of the Gromov-Hausdorff space: it is a polish space,
i.e., it is complete and second countable. We also prove the Gromov compactness criterion.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space
universes u v w
open classical set function topological_space filter metric quotient
open bounded_continuous_function nat Kuratowski_embedding
open sum (inl inr)
set_option class.instance_max_depth 50
local attribute [instance] metric_space_sum
namespace Gromov_Hausdorff
section GH_space
/- In this section, we define the Gromov-Hausdorff space, denoted `GH_space` as the quotient
of nonempty compact subsets of `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` by identifying isometric sets.
Using the Kuratwoski embedding, we get a canonical map `to_GH_space` mapping any nonempty
compact type to `GH_space`. -/
/-- Equivalence relation identifying two nonempty compact sets which are isometric -/
private definition isometry_rel : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ → nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ → Prop :=
λx y, nonempty (x.val ≃ᵢ y.val)
/-- This is indeed an equivalence relation -/
private lemma is_equivalence_isometry_rel : equivalence isometry_rel :=
⟨λx, ⟨isometric.refl _⟩, λx y ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.symm⟩, λ x y z ⟨e⟩ ⟨f⟩, ⟨e.trans f⟩⟩
/-- setoid instance identifying two isometric nonempty compact subspaces of ℓ^∞(ℝ) -/
instance isometry_rel.setoid : setoid (nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ) :=
setoid.mk isometry_rel is_equivalence_isometry_rel
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff space -/
definition GH_space : Type := quotient (isometry_rel.setoid)
/-- Map any nonempty compact type to `GH_space` -/
definition to_GH_space (α : Type u) [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α] : GH_space :=
⟦nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding α⟧
instance : inhabited GH_space := ⟨quot.mk _ ⟨{0}, by simp⟩⟩
/-- A metric space representative of any abstract point in `GH_space` -/
definition GH_space.rep (p : GH_space) : Type := (quot.out p).val
lemma eq_to_GH_space_iff {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α] {p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ} :
⟦p⟧ = to_GH_space α ↔ ∃Ψ : α → ℓ_infty_ℝ, isometry Ψ ∧ range Ψ = p.val :=
begin
simp only [to_GH_space, quotient.eq],
split,
{ assume h,
rcases setoid.symm h with ⟨e⟩,
have f := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry α).isometric_on_range.trans e,
use λx, f x,
split,
{ apply isometry_subtype_val.comp f.isometry },
{ rw [range_comp, f.range_coe, set.image_univ, set.range_coe_subtype] } },
{ rintros ⟨Ψ, ⟨isomΨ, rangeΨ⟩⟩,
have f := ((Kuratowski_embedding.isometry α).isometric_on_range.symm.trans
isomΨ.isometric_on_range).symm,
have E : (range Ψ ≃ᵢ (nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding α).val) = (p.val ≃ᵢ range (Kuratowski_embedding α)),
by { dunfold nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding, rw [rangeΨ]; refl },
have g := cast E f,
exact ⟨g⟩ }
end
lemma eq_to_GH_space {p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ} : ⟦p⟧ = to_GH_space p.val :=
begin
refine eq_to_GH_space_iff.2 ⟨((λx, x) : p.val → ℓ_infty_ℝ), _, subtype.val_range⟩,
apply isometry_subtype_val
end
section
local attribute [reducible] GH_space.rep
instance rep_GH_space_metric_space {p : GH_space} : metric_space (p.rep) :=
by apply_instance
instance rep_GH_space_compact_space {p : GH_space} : compact_space (p.rep) :=
by apply_instance
instance rep_GH_space_nonempty {p : GH_space} : nonempty (p.rep) :=
by apply_instance
end
lemma GH_space.to_GH_space_rep (p : GH_space) : to_GH_space (p.rep) = p :=
begin
change to_GH_space (quot.out p).val = p,
rw ← eq_to_GH_space,
exact quot.out_eq p
end
/-- Two nonempty compact spaces have the same image in `GH_space` if and only if they are isometric -/
lemma to_GH_space_eq_to_GH_space_iff_isometric {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α]
{β : Type u} [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [nonempty β] :
to_GH_space α = to_GH_space β ↔ nonempty (α ≃ᵢ β) :=
⟨begin
simp only [to_GH_space, quotient.eq],
assume h,
rcases h with e,
have I : ((nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding α).val ≃ᵢ (nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding β).val)
= ((range (Kuratowski_embedding α)) ≃ᵢ (range (Kuratowski_embedding β))),
by { dunfold nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding, refl },
have e' := cast I e,
have f := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry α).isometric_on_range,
have g := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry β).isometric_on_range.symm,
have h := (f.trans e').trans g,
exact ⟨h⟩
end,
begin
rintros ⟨e⟩,
simp only [to_GH_space, quotient.eq],
have f := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry α).isometric_on_range.symm,
have g := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry β).isometric_on_range,
have h := (f.trans e).trans g,
have I : ((range (Kuratowski_embedding α)) ≃ᵢ (range (Kuratowski_embedding β))) =
((nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding α).val ≃ᵢ (nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding β).val),
by { dunfold nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding, refl },
have h' := cast I h,
exact ⟨h'⟩
end⟩
/-- Distance on `GH_space`: the distance between two nonempty compact spaces is the infimum
Hausdorff distance between isometric copies of the two spaces in a metric space. For the definition,
we only consider embeddings in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, but we will prove below that it works for all spaces. -/
instance : has_dist (GH_space) :=
{ dist := λx y, Inf ((λp : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ, Hausdorff_dist p.1.val p.2.val) ''
(set.prod {a | ⟦a⟧ = x} {b | ⟦b⟧ = y})) }
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two nonempty compact metric spaces, equal by definition to
the distance of the equivalence classes of these spaces in the Gromov-Hausdorff space. -/
def GH_dist (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [metric_space α] [nonempty α] [compact_space α]
[metric_space β] [nonempty β] [compact_space β] : ℝ := dist (to_GH_space α) (to_GH_space β)
lemma dist_GH_dist (p q : GH_space) : dist p q = GH_dist (p.rep) (q.rep) :=
by rw [GH_dist, p.to_GH_space_rep, q.to_GH_space_rep]
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two spaces is bounded by the Hausdorff distance
of isometric copies of the spaces, in any metric space. -/
theorem GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α]
{β : Type v} [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [nonempty β]
{γ : Type w} [metric_space γ] {Φ : α → γ} {Ψ : β → γ} (ha : isometry Φ) (hb : isometry Ψ) :
GH_dist α β ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range Φ) (range Ψ) :=
begin
/- For the proof, we want to embed `γ` in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, to say that the Hausdorff distance is realized
in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` and therefore bounded below by the Gromov-Hausdorff-distance. However, `γ` is not
separable in general. We restrict to the union of the images of `α` and `β` in `γ`, which is
separable and therefore embeddable in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`. -/
rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty α with ⟨xα, _⟩,
letI : inhabited α := ⟨xα⟩,
letI : inhabited β := classical.inhabited_of_nonempty (by assumption),
let s : set γ := (range Φ) ∪ (range Ψ),
let Φ' : α → subtype s := λy, ⟨Φ y, mem_union_left _ (mem_range_self _)⟩,
let Ψ' : β → subtype s := λy, ⟨Ψ y, mem_union_right _ (mem_range_self _)⟩,
have IΦ' : isometry Φ' := λx y, ha x y,
have IΨ' : isometry Ψ' := λx y, hb x y,
have : compact s, from (compact_range ha.continuous).union (compact_range hb.continuous),
letI : metric_space (subtype s) := by apply_instance,
haveI : compact_space (subtype s) := ⟨compact_iff_compact_univ.1 ‹compact s›⟩,
haveI : nonempty (subtype s) := ⟨Φ' xα⟩,
have ΦΦ' : Φ = subtype.val ∘ Φ', by { funext, refl },
have ΨΨ' : Ψ = subtype.val ∘ Ψ', by { funext, refl },
have : Hausdorff_dist (range Φ) (range Ψ) = Hausdorff_dist (range Φ') (range Ψ'),
{ rw [ΦΦ', ΨΨ', range_comp, range_comp],
exact Hausdorff_dist_image (isometry_subtype_val) },
rw this,
-- Embed `s` in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` through its Kuratowski embedding
let F := Kuratowski_embedding (subtype s),
have : Hausdorff_dist (F '' (range Φ')) (F '' (range Ψ')) = Hausdorff_dist (range Φ') (range Ψ') :=
Hausdorff_dist_image (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _),
rw ← this,
-- Let `A` and `B` be the images of `α` and `β` under this embedding. They are in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, and
-- their Hausdorff distance is the same as in the original space.
let A : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ := ⟨F '' (range Φ'), ⟨(range_nonempty _).image _,
(compact_range IΦ'.continuous).image (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).continuous⟩⟩,
let B : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ := ⟨F '' (range Ψ'), ⟨(range_nonempty _).image _,
(compact_range IΨ'.continuous).image (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).continuous⟩⟩,
have Aα : ⟦A⟧ = to_GH_space α,
{ rw eq_to_GH_space_iff,
exact ⟨λx, F (Φ' x), ⟨(Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).comp IΦ', by rw range_comp⟩⟩ },
have Bβ : ⟦B⟧ = to_GH_space β,
{ rw eq_to_GH_space_iff,
exact ⟨λx, F (Ψ' x), ⟨(Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).comp IΨ', by rw range_comp⟩⟩ },
refine cInf_le ⟨0,
begin simp [lower_bounds], assume t _ _ _ _ ht, rw ← ht, exact Hausdorff_dist_nonneg end⟩ _,
apply (mem_image _ _ _).2,
existsi (⟨A, B⟩ : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ),
simp [Aα, Bβ]
end
/-- The optimal coupling constructed above realizes exactly the Gromov-Hausdorff distance,
essentially by design. -/
lemma Hausdorff_dist_optimal {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α]
{β : Type v} [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [nonempty β] :
Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl α β)) (range (optimal_GH_injr α β)) = GH_dist α β :=
begin
inhabit α, inhabit β,
/- we only need to check the inequality `≤`, as the other one follows from the previous lemma.
As the Gromov-Hausdorff distance is an infimum, we need to check that the Hausdorff distance
in the optimal coupling is smaller than the Hausdorff distance of any coupling.
First, we check this for couplings which already have small Hausdorff distance: in this
case, the induced "distance" on `α ⊕ β` belongs to the candidates family introduced in the
definition of the optimal coupling, and the conclusion follows from the optimality
of the optimal coupling within this family.
-/
have A : ∀p q : nonempty_compacts (ℓ_infty_ℝ), ⟦p⟧ = to_GH_space α → ⟦q⟧ = to_GH_space β →
Hausdorff_dist (p.val) (q.val) < diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β) →
Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl α β)) (range (optimal_GH_injr α β)) ≤ Hausdorff_dist (p.val) (q.val),
{ assume p q hp hq bound,
rcases eq_to_GH_space_iff.1 hp with ⟨Φ, ⟨Φisom, Φrange⟩⟩,
rcases eq_to_GH_space_iff.1 hq with ⟨Ψ, ⟨Ψisom, Ψrange⟩⟩,
have I : diam (range Φ ∪ range Ψ) ≤ 2 * diam (univ : set α) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set β),
{ rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty α with ⟨xα, _⟩,
have : ∃y ∈ range Ψ, dist (Φ xα) y < diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β),
{ rw Ψrange,
have : Φ xα ∈ p.val := Φrange ▸ mem_range_self _,
exact exists_dist_lt_of_Hausdorff_dist_lt this bound
(Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded p.2.1 q.2.1 p.2.2.bounded q.2.2.bounded) },
rcases this with ⟨y, hy, dy⟩,
rcases mem_range.1 hy with ⟨z, hzy⟩,
rw ← hzy at dy,
have DΦ : diam (range Φ) = diam (univ : set α) := Φisom.diam_range,
have DΨ : diam (range Ψ) = diam (univ : set β) := Ψisom.diam_range,
calc
diam (range Φ ∪ range Ψ) ≤ diam (range Φ) + dist (Φ xα) (Ψ z) + diam (range Ψ) :
diam_union (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _)
... ≤ diam (univ : set α) + (diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β)) + diam (univ : set β) :
by { rw [DΦ, DΨ], apply add_le_add (add_le_add (le_refl _) (le_of_lt dy)) (le_refl _) }
... = 2 * diam (univ : set α) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set β) : by ring },
let f : α ⊕ β → ℓ_infty_ℝ := λx, match x with | inl y := Φ y | inr z := Ψ z end,
let F : (α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β) → ℝ := λp, dist (f p.1) (f p.2),
-- check that the induced "distance" is a candidate
have Fgood : F ∈ candidates α β,
{ simp only [candidates, forall_const, and_true, add_comm, eq_self_iff_true, dist_eq_zero,
and_self, set.mem_set_of_eq],
repeat {split},
{ exact λx y, calc
F (inl x, inl y) = dist (Φ x) (Φ y) : rfl
... = dist x y : Φisom.dist_eq },
{ exact λx y, calc
F (inr x, inr y) = dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y) : rfl
... = dist x y : Ψisom.dist_eq },
{ exact λx y, dist_comm _ _ },
{ exact λx y z, dist_triangle _ _ _ },
{ exact λx y, calc
F (x, y) ≤ diam (range Φ ∪ range Ψ) :
begin
have A : ∀z : α ⊕ β, f z ∈ range Φ ∪ range Ψ,
{ assume z,
cases z,
{ apply mem_union_left, apply mem_range_self },
{ apply mem_union_right, apply mem_range_self } },
refine dist_le_diam_of_mem _ (A _) (A _),
rw [Φrange, Ψrange],
exact (p.2.2.union q.2.2).bounded,
end
... ≤ 2 * diam (univ : set α) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set β) : I } },
let Fb := candidates_b_of_candidates F Fgood,
have : Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl α β)) (range (optimal_GH_injr α β)) ≤ HD Fb :=
Hausdorff_dist_optimal_le_HD _ _ (candidates_b_of_candidates_mem F Fgood),
refine le_trans this (le_of_forall_le_of_dense (λr hr, _)),
have I1 : ∀x : α, infi (λy:β, Fb (inl x, inr y)) ≤ r,
{ assume x,
have : f (inl x) ∈ p.val, by { rw [← Φrange], apply mem_range_self },
rcases exists_dist_lt_of_Hausdorff_dist_lt this hr
(Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded p.2.1 q.2.1 p.2.2.bounded q.2.2.bounded)
with ⟨z, zq, hz⟩,
have : z ∈ range Ψ, by rwa [← Ψrange] at zq,
rcases mem_range.1 this with ⟨y, hy⟩,
calc infi (λy:β, Fb (inl x, inr y)) ≤ Fb (inl x, inr y) :
cinfi_le (by simpa using HD_below_aux1 0)
... = dist (Φ x) (Ψ y) : rfl
... = dist (f (inl x)) z : by rw hy
... ≤ r : le_of_lt hz },
have I2 : ∀y : β, infi (λx:α, Fb (inl x, inr y)) ≤ r,
{ assume y,
have : f (inr y) ∈ q.val, by { rw [← Ψrange], apply mem_range_self },
rcases exists_dist_lt_of_Hausdorff_dist_lt' this hr
(Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded p.2.1 q.2.1 p.2.2.bounded q.2.2.bounded)
with ⟨z, zq, hz⟩,
have : z ∈ range Φ, by rwa [← Φrange] at zq,
rcases mem_range.1 this with ⟨x, hx⟩,
calc infi (λx:α, Fb (inl x, inr y)) ≤ Fb (inl x, inr y) :
cinfi_le (by simpa using HD_below_aux2 0)
... = dist (Φ x) (Ψ y) : rfl
... = dist z (f (inr y)) : by rw hx
... ≤ r : le_of_lt hz },
simp [HD, csupr_le I1, csupr_le I2] },
/- Get the same inequality for any coupling. If the coupling is quite good, the desired
inequality has been proved above. If it is bad, then the inequality is obvious. -/
have B : ∀p q : nonempty_compacts (ℓ_infty_ℝ), ⟦p⟧ = to_GH_space α → ⟦q⟧ = to_GH_space β →
Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl α β)) (range (optimal_GH_injr α β)) ≤ Hausdorff_dist (p.val) (q.val),
{ assume p q hp hq,
by_cases h : Hausdorff_dist (p.val) (q.val) < diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β),
{ exact A p q hp hq h },
{ calc Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl α β)) (range (optimal_GH_injr α β)) ≤ HD (candidates_b_dist α β) :
Hausdorff_dist_optimal_le_HD _ _ (candidates_b_dist_mem_candidates_b)
... ≤ diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β) : HD_candidates_b_dist_le
... ≤ Hausdorff_dist (p.val) (q.val) : not_lt.1 h } },
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ apply le_cInf,
{ refine (set.nonempty.prod _ _).image _; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro b ⟨⟨p, q⟩, ⟨hp, hq⟩, rfl⟩,
exact B p q hp hq } },
{ exact GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist (isometry_optimal_GH_injl α β) (isometry_optimal_GH_injr α β) }
end
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance can also be realized by a coupling in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, by embedding
the optimal coupling through its Kuratowski embedding. -/
theorem GH_dist_eq_Hausdorff_dist (α : Type u) [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α]
(β : Type v) [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [nonempty β] :
∃Φ : α → ℓ_infty_ℝ, ∃Ψ : β → ℓ_infty_ℝ, isometry Φ ∧ isometry Ψ ∧
GH_dist α β = Hausdorff_dist (range Φ) (range Ψ) :=
begin
let F := Kuratowski_embedding (optimal_GH_coupling α β),
let Φ := F ∘ optimal_GH_injl α β,
let Ψ := F ∘ optimal_GH_injr α β,
refine ⟨Φ, Ψ, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injl α β) },
{ exact (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injr α β) },
{ rw [← image_univ, ← image_univ, image_comp F, image_univ, image_comp F (optimal_GH_injr α β),
image_univ, ← Hausdorff_dist_optimal],
exact (Hausdorff_dist_image (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _)).symm },
end
-- without the next two lines, `{ exact closed_of_compact (range Φ) hΦ }` in the next
-- proof is very slow, as the `t2_space` instance is very hard to find
local attribute [instance, priority 10] order_topology.t2_space
local attribute [instance, priority 10] order_closed_topology.to_t2_space
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance defines a genuine distance on the Gromov-Hausdorff space. -/
instance GH_space_metric_space : metric_space GH_space :=
{ dist_self := λx, begin
rcases exists_rep x with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ apply cInf_le,
{ exact ⟨0, by { rintro b ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨hu, hv⟩, rfl⟩, exact Hausdorff_dist_nonneg } ⟩},
{ simp, existsi [y, y], simpa } },
{ apply le_cInf,
{ exact (nonempty.prod ⟨y, hy⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩).image _ },
{ rintro b ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨hu, hv⟩, rfl⟩, exact Hausdorff_dist_nonneg } },
end,
dist_comm := λx y, begin
have A : (λ (p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ),
Hausdorff_dist ((p.fst).val) ((p.snd).val)) '' (set.prod {a | ⟦a⟧ = x} {b | ⟦b⟧ = y})
= ((λ (p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ),
Hausdorff_dist ((p.fst).val) ((p.snd).val)) ∘ prod.swap) '' (set.prod {a | ⟦a⟧ = x} {b | ⟦b⟧ = y}) :=
by { congr, funext, simp, rw Hausdorff_dist_comm },
simp only [dist, A, image_comp, prod.swap, image_swap_prod],
end,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λx y hxy, begin
/- To show that two spaces at zero distance are isometric, we argue that the distance
is realized by some coupling. In this coupling, the two spaces are at zero Hausdorff distance,
i.e., they coincide. Therefore, the original spaces are isometric. -/
rcases GH_dist_eq_Hausdorff_dist x.rep y.rep with ⟨Φ, Ψ, Φisom, Ψisom, DΦΨ⟩,
rw [← dist_GH_dist, hxy] at DΦΨ,
have : range Φ = range Ψ,
{ have hΦ : compact (range Φ) := compact_range Φisom.continuous,
have hΨ : compact (range Ψ) := compact_range Ψisom.continuous,
apply (Hausdorff_dist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed _ _ _).1 (DΦΨ.symm),
{ exact closed_of_compact (range Φ) hΦ },
{ exact closed_of_compact (range Ψ) hΨ },
{ exact Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded (range_nonempty _)
(range_nonempty _) hΦ.bounded hΨ.bounded } },
have T : ((range Ψ) ≃ᵢ y.rep) = ((range Φ) ≃ᵢ y.rep), by rw this,
have eΨ := cast T Ψisom.isometric_on_range.symm,
have e := Φisom.isometric_on_range.trans eΨ,
rw [← x.to_GH_space_rep, ← y.to_GH_space_rep, to_GH_space_eq_to_GH_space_iff_isometric],
exact ⟨e⟩
end,
dist_triangle := λx y z, begin
/- To show the triangular inequality between `X`, `Y` and `Z`, realize an optimal coupling
between `X` and `Y` in a space `γ1`, and an optimal coupling between `Y`and `Z` in a space `γ2`.
Then, glue these metric spaces along `Y`. We get a new space `γ` in which `X` and `Y` are
optimally coupled, as well as `Y` and `Z`. Apply the triangle inequality for the Hausdorff
distance in `γ` to conclude. -/
let X := x.rep,
let Y := y.rep,
let Z := z.rep,
let γ1 := optimal_GH_coupling X Y,
let γ2 := optimal_GH_coupling Y Z,
let Φ : Y → γ1 := optimal_GH_injr X Y,
have hΦ : isometry Φ := isometry_optimal_GH_injr X Y,
let Ψ : Y → γ2 := optimal_GH_injl Y Z,
have hΨ : isometry Ψ := isometry_optimal_GH_injl Y Z,
let γ := glue_space hΦ hΨ,
letI : metric_space γ := metric.metric_space_glue_space hΦ hΨ,
have Comm : (to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr X Y) = (to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injl Y Z) :=
to_glue_commute hΦ hΨ,
calc dist x z = dist (to_GH_space X) (to_GH_space Z) :
by rw [x.to_GH_space_rep, z.to_GH_space_rep]
... ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injl X Y)))
(range ((to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr Y Z))) :
GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist
((to_glue_l_isometry hΦ hΨ).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injl X Y))
((to_glue_r_isometry hΦ hΨ).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injr Y Z))
... ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injl X Y)))
(range ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr X Y)))
+ Hausdorff_dist (range ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr X Y)))
(range ((to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr Y Z))) :
begin
refine Hausdorff_dist_triangle (Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded
(range_nonempty _) (range_nonempty _) _ _),
{ exact (compact_range (isometry.continuous ((to_glue_l_isometry hΦ hΨ).comp
(isometry_optimal_GH_injl X Y)))).bounded },
{ exact (compact_range (isometry.continuous ((to_glue_l_isometry hΦ hΨ).comp
(isometry_optimal_GH_injr X Y)))).bounded }
end
... = Hausdorff_dist ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) '' (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y)))
((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) '' (range (optimal_GH_injr X Y)))
+ Hausdorff_dist ((to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) '' (range (optimal_GH_injl Y Z)))
((to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) '' (range (optimal_GH_injr Y Z))) :
by simp only [eq.symm range_comp, Comm, eq_self_iff_true, add_right_inj]
... = Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y))
(range (optimal_GH_injr X Y))
+ Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl Y Z))
(range (optimal_GH_injr Y Z)) :
by rw [Hausdorff_dist_image (to_glue_l_isometry hΦ hΨ),
Hausdorff_dist_image (to_glue_r_isometry hΦ hΨ)]
... = dist (to_GH_space X) (to_GH_space Y) + dist (to_GH_space Y) (to_GH_space Z) :
by rw [Hausdorff_dist_optimal, Hausdorff_dist_optimal, GH_dist, GH_dist]
... = dist x y + dist y z:
by rw [x.to_GH_space_rep, y.to_GH_space_rep, z.to_GH_space_rep]
end }
end GH_space --section
end Gromov_Hausdorff
/-- In particular, nonempty compacts of a metric space map to `GH_space`. We register this
in the topological_space namespace to take advantage of the notation `p.to_GH_space`. -/
definition topological_space.nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space {α : Type u} [metric_space α]
(p : nonempty_compacts α) : Gromov_Hausdorff.GH_space := Gromov_Hausdorff.to_GH_space p.val
open topological_space
namespace Gromov_Hausdorff
section nonempty_compacts
variables {α : Type u} [metric_space α]
theorem GH_dist_le_nonempty_compacts_dist (p q : nonempty_compacts α) :
dist p.to_GH_space q.to_GH_space ≤ dist p q :=
begin
have ha : isometry (subtype.val : p.val → α) := isometry_subtype_val,
have hb : isometry (subtype.val : q.val → α) := isometry_subtype_val,
have A : dist p q = Hausdorff_dist p.val q.val := rfl,
have I : p.val = range (subtype.val : p.val → α), by simp,
have J : q.val = range (subtype.val : q.val → α), by simp,
rw [I, J] at A,
rw A,
exact GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist ha hb
end
lemma to_GH_space_lipschitz :
lipschitz_with 1 (nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space : nonempty_compacts α → GH_space) :=
lipschitz_with.mk_one GH_dist_le_nonempty_compacts_dist
lemma to_GH_space_continuous :
continuous (nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space : nonempty_compacts α → GH_space) :=
to_GH_space_lipschitz.continuous
end nonempty_compacts
section
/- In this section, we show that if two metric spaces are isometric up to `ε₂`, then their
Gromov-Hausdorff distance is bounded by `ε₂ / 2`. More generally, if there are subsets which are
`ε₁`-dense and `ε₃`-dense in two spaces, and isometric up to `ε₂`, then the Gromov-Hausdorff distance
between the spaces is bounded by `ε₁ + ε₂/2 + ε₃`. For this, we construct a suitable coupling between
the two spaces, by gluing them (approximately) along the two matching subsets. -/
variables {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α]
{β : Type v} [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [nonempty β]
-- we want to ignore these instances in the following theorem
local attribute [instance, priority 10] sum.topological_space sum.uniform_space
/-- If there are subsets which are `ε₁`-dense and `ε₃`-dense in two spaces, and
isometric up to `ε₂`, then the Gromov-Hausdorff distance between the spaces is bounded by
`ε₁ + ε₂/2 + ε₃`. -/
theorem GH_dist_le_of_approx_subsets {s : set α} (Φ : s → β) {ε₁ ε₂ ε₃ : ℝ}
(hs : ∀x : α, ∃y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ ε₁) (hs' : ∀x : β, ∃y : s, dist x (Φ y) ≤ ε₃)
(H : ∀x y : s, abs (dist x y - dist (Φ x) (Φ y)) ≤ ε₂) :
GH_dist α β ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ / 2 + ε₃ :=
begin
refine real.le_of_forall_epsilon_le (λδ δ0, _),
rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty α with ⟨xα, _⟩,
rcases hs xα with ⟨xs, hxs, Dxs⟩,
have sne : s.nonempty := ⟨xs, hxs⟩,
letI : nonempty s := sne.to_subtype,
have : 0 ≤ ε₂ := le_trans (abs_nonneg _) (H ⟨xs, hxs⟩ ⟨xs, hxs⟩),
have : ∀ p q : s, abs (dist p q - dist (Φ p) (Φ q)) ≤ 2 * (ε₂/2 + δ) := λp q, calc
abs (dist p q - dist (Φ p) (Φ q)) ≤ ε₂ : H p q
... ≤ 2 * (ε₂/2 + δ) : by linarith,
-- glue `α` and `β` along the almost matching subsets
letI : metric_space (α ⊕ β) := glue_metric_approx (λ x:s, (x:α)) (λx, Φ x) (ε₂/2 + δ) (by linarith) this,
let Fl := @sum.inl α β,
let Fr := @sum.inr α β,
have Il : isometry Fl := isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 (λx y, rfl),
have Ir : isometry Fr := isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 (λx y, rfl),
/- The proof goes as follows : the `GH_dist` is bounded by the Hausdorff distance of the images in the
coupling, which is bounded (using the triangular inequality) by the sum of the Hausdorff distances
of `α` and `s` (in the coupling or, equivalently in the original space), of `s` and `Φ s`, and of
`Φ s` and `β` (in the coupling or, equivalently, in the original space). The first term is bounded
by `ε₁`, by `ε₁`-density. The third one is bounded by `ε₃`. And the middle one is bounded by `ε₂/2`
as in the coupling the points `x` and `Φ x` are at distance `ε₂/2` by construction of the coupling
(in fact `ε₂/2 + δ` where `δ` is an arbitrarily small positive constant where positivity is used
to ensure that the coupling is really a metric space and not a premetric space on `α ⊕ β`). -/
have : GH_dist α β ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range Fl) (range Fr) :=
GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist Il Ir,
have : Hausdorff_dist (range Fl) (range Fr) ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range Fl) (Fl '' s)
+ Hausdorff_dist (Fl '' s) (range Fr),
{ have B : bounded (range Fl) := (compact_range Il.continuous).bounded,
exact Hausdorff_dist_triangle (Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded
(range_nonempty _) (sne.image _) B (B.subset (image_subset_range _ _))) },
have : Hausdorff_dist (Fl '' s) (range Fr) ≤ Hausdorff_dist (Fl '' s) (Fr '' (range Φ))
+ Hausdorff_dist (Fr '' (range Φ)) (range Fr),
{ have B : bounded (range Fr) := (compact_range Ir.continuous).bounded,
exact Hausdorff_dist_triangle' (Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded
((range_nonempty _).image _) (range_nonempty _)
(bounded.subset (image_subset_range _ _) B) B) },
have : Hausdorff_dist (range Fl) (Fl '' s) ≤ ε₁,
{ rw [← image_univ, Hausdorff_dist_image Il],
have : 0 ≤ ε₁ := le_trans dist_nonneg Dxs,
refine Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist this (λx hx, hs x)
(λx hx, ⟨x, mem_univ _, by simpa⟩) },
have : Hausdorff_dist (Fl '' s) (Fr '' (range Φ)) ≤ ε₂/2 + δ,
{ refine Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist (by linarith) _ _,
{ assume x' hx',
rcases (set.mem_image _ _ _).1 hx' with ⟨x, ⟨x_in_s, xx'⟩⟩,
rw ← xx',
use [Fr (Φ ⟨x, x_in_s⟩), mem_image_of_mem Fr (mem_range_self _)],
exact le_of_eq (glue_dist_glued_points (λ x:s, (x:α)) Φ (ε₂/2 + δ) ⟨x, x_in_s⟩) },
{ assume x' hx',
rcases (set.mem_image _ _ _).1 hx' with ⟨y, ⟨y_in_s', yx'⟩⟩,
rcases mem_range.1 y_in_s' with ⟨x, xy⟩,
use [Fl x, mem_image_of_mem _ x.2],
rw [← yx', ← xy, dist_comm],
exact le_of_eq (glue_dist_glued_points (@subtype.val α s) Φ (ε₂/2 + δ) x) } },
have : Hausdorff_dist (Fr '' (range Φ)) (range Fr) ≤ ε₃,
{ rw [← @image_univ _ _ Fr, Hausdorff_dist_image Ir],
rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty β with ⟨xβ, _⟩,
rcases hs' xβ with ⟨xs', Dxs'⟩,
have : 0 ≤ ε₃ := le_trans dist_nonneg Dxs',
refine Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist this (λx hx, ⟨x, mem_univ _, by simpa⟩) (λx _, _),
rcases hs' x with ⟨y, Dy⟩,
exact ⟨Φ y, mem_range_self _, Dy⟩ },
linarith
end
end --section
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff space is second countable. -/
instance second_countable : second_countable_topology GH_space :=
begin
refine second_countable_of_countable_discretization (λδ δpos, _),
let ε := (2/5) * δ,
have εpos : 0 < ε := mul_pos (by norm_num) δpos,
have : ∀p:GH_space, ∃s : set (p.rep), finite s ∧ (univ ⊆ (⋃x∈s, ball x ε)) :=
λp, by simpa using finite_cover_balls_of_compact (@compact_univ p.rep _ _) εpos,
-- for each `p`, `s p` is a finite `ε`-dense subset of `p` (or rather the metric space
-- `p.rep` representing `p`)
choose s hs using this,
have : ∀p:GH_space, ∀t:set (p.rep), finite t → ∃n:ℕ, ∃e:equiv t (fin n), true,
{ assume p t ht,
letI : fintype t := finite.fintype ht,
rcases fintype.exists_equiv_fin t with ⟨n, hn⟩,
rcases hn with e,
exact ⟨n, e, trivial⟩ },
choose N e hne using this,
-- cardinality of the nice finite subset `s p` of `p.rep`, called `N p`
let N := λp:GH_space, N p (s p) (hs p).1,
-- equiv from `s p`, a nice finite subset of `p.rep`, to `fin (N p)`, called `E p`
let E := λp:GH_space, e p (s p) (hs p).1,
-- A function `F` associating to `p : GH_space` the data of all distances between points
-- in the `ε`-dense set `s p`.
let F : GH_space → Σn:ℕ, (fin n → fin n → ℤ) :=
λp, ⟨N p, λa b, floor (ε⁻¹ * dist ((E p).symm a) ((E p).symm b))⟩,
refine ⟨_, by apply_instance, F, λp q hpq, _⟩,
/- As the target space of F is countable, it suffices to show that two points
`p` and `q` with `F p = F q` are at distance `≤ δ`.
For this, we construct a map `Φ` from `s p ⊆ p.rep` (representing `p`)
to `q.rep` (representing `q`) which is almost an isometry on `s p`, and
with image `s q`. For this, we compose the identification of `s p` with `fin (N p)`
and the inverse of the identification of `s q` with `fin (N q)`. Together with
the fact that `N p = N q`, this constructs `Ψ` between `s p` and `s q`, and then
composing with the canonical inclusion we get `Φ`. -/
have Npq : N p = N q := (sigma.mk.inj_iff.1 hpq).1,
let Ψ : s p → s q := λx, (E q).symm (fin.cast Npq ((E p) x)),
let Φ : s p → q.rep := λx, Ψ x,
-- Use the almost isometry `Φ` to show that `p.rep` and `q.rep`
-- are within controlled Gromov-Hausdorff distance.
have main : GH_dist p.rep q.rep ≤ ε + ε/2 + ε,
{ refine GH_dist_le_of_approx_subsets Φ _ _ _,
show ∀x : p.rep, ∃ (y : p.rep) (H : y ∈ s p), dist x y ≤ ε,
{ -- by construction, `s p` is `ε`-dense
assume x,
have : x ∈ ⋃y∈(s p), ball y ε := (hs p).2 (mem_univ _),
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 this with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
exact ⟨y, ys, le_of_lt hy⟩ },
show ∀x : q.rep, ∃ (z : s p), dist x (Φ z) ≤ ε,
{ -- by construction, `s q` is `ε`-dense, and it is the range of `Φ`
assume x,
have : x ∈ ⋃y∈(s q), ball y ε := (hs q).2 (mem_univ _),
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 this with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
let i := ((E q) ⟨y, ys⟩).1,
let hi := ((E q) ⟨y, ys⟩).2,
have ihi_eq : (⟨i, hi⟩ : fin (N q)) = (E q) ⟨y, ys⟩, by rw fin.ext_iff,
have hiq : i < N q := hi,
have hip : i < N p, { rwa Npq.symm at hiq },
let z := (E p).symm ⟨i, hip⟩,
use z,
have C1 : (E p) z = ⟨i, hip⟩ := (E p).apply_symm_apply ⟨i, hip⟩,
have C2 : fin.cast Npq ⟨i, hip⟩ = ⟨i, hi⟩ := rfl,
have C3 : (E q).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ = ⟨y, ys⟩, by { rw ihi_eq, exact (E q).symm_apply_apply ⟨y, ys⟩ },
have : Φ z = y :=
by { simp only [Φ, Ψ], rw [C1, C2, C3], refl },
rw this,
exact le_of_lt hy },
show ∀x y : s p, abs (dist x y - dist (Φ x) (Φ y)) ≤ ε,
{ /- the distance between `x` and `y` is encoded in `F p`, and the distance between
`Φ x` and `Φ y` (two points of `s q`) is encoded in `F q`, all this up to `ε`.
As `F p = F q`, the distances are almost equal. -/
assume x y,
have : dist (Φ x) (Φ y) = dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y) := rfl,
rw this,
-- introduce `i`, that codes both `x` and `Φ x` in `fin (N p) = fin (N q)`
let i := ((E p) x).1,
have hip : i < N p := ((E p) x).2,
have hiq : i < N q, by rwa Npq at hip,
have i' : i = ((E q) (Ψ x)).1, by { simp [Ψ] },
-- introduce `j`, that codes both `y` and `Φ y` in `fin (N p) = fin (N q)`
let j := ((E p) y).1,
have hjp : j < N p := ((E p) y).2,
have hjq : j < N q, by rwa Npq at hjp,
have j' : j = ((E q) (Ψ y)).1, by { simp [Ψ] },
-- Express `dist x y` in terms of `F p`
have : (F p).2 ((E p) x) ((E p) y) = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y),
by simp only [F, (E p).symm_apply_apply],
have Ap : (F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩ = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y),
by { rw ← this, congr; apply (fin.ext_iff _ _).2; refl },
-- Express `dist (Φ x) (Φ y)` in terms of `F q`
have : (F q).2 ((E q) (Ψ x)) ((E q) (Ψ y)) = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)),
by simp only [F, (E q).symm_apply_apply],
have Aq : (F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩ = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)),
by { rw ← this, congr; apply (fin.ext_iff _ _).2; [exact i', exact j'] },
-- use the equality between `F p` and `F q` to deduce that the distances have equal
-- integer parts
have : (F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩ = (F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩,
{ -- we want to `subst hpq` where `hpq : F p = F q`, except that `subst` only works
-- with a constant, so replace `F q` (and everything that depends on it) by a constant `f`
-- then `subst`
revert hiq hjq,
change N q with (F q).1,
generalize_hyp : F q = f at hpq ⊢,
subst hpq,
intros,
refl },
rw [Ap, Aq] at this,
-- deduce that the distances coincide up to `ε`, by a straightforward computation
-- that should be automated
have I := calc
abs (ε⁻¹) * abs (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)) =
abs (ε⁻¹ * (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))) : (abs_mul _ _).symm
... = abs ((ε⁻¹ * dist x y) - (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))) : by { congr, ring }
... ≤ 1 : le_of_lt (abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor this),
calc
abs (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)) = (ε * ε⁻¹) * abs (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)) :
by rw [mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt εpos), one_mul]
... = ε * (abs (ε⁻¹) * abs (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))) :
by rw [abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)), mul_assoc]
... ≤ ε * 1 : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left I (le_of_lt εpos)
... = ε : mul_one _ } },
calc dist p q = GH_dist (p.rep) (q.rep) : dist_GH_dist p q
... ≤ ε + ε/2 + ε : main
... = δ : by { simp [ε], ring }
end
/-- Compactness criterion: a closed set of compact metric spaces is compact if the spaces have
a uniformly bounded diameter, and for all `ε` the number of balls of radius `ε` required
to cover the spaces is uniformly bounded. This is an equivalence, but we only prove the
interesting direction that these conditions imply compactness. -/
lemma totally_bounded {t : set GH_space} {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → ℝ} {K : ℕ → ℕ}
(ulim : tendsto u at_top (𝓝 0))
(hdiam : ∀p ∈ t, diam (univ : set (GH_space.rep p)) ≤ C)
(hcov : ∀p ∈ t, ∀n:ℕ, ∃s : set (GH_space.rep p), cardinal.mk s ≤ K n ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃x∈s, ball x (u n)) :
totally_bounded t :=
begin
/- Let `δ>0`, and `ε = δ/5`. For each `p`, we construct a finite subset `s p` of `p`, which
is `ε`-dense and has cardinality at most `K n`. Encoding the mutual distances of points in `s p`,
up to `ε`, we will get a map `F` associating to `p` finitely many data, and making it possible to
reconstruct `p` up to `ε`. This is enough to prove total boundedness. -/
refine metric.totally_bounded_of_finite_discretization (λδ δpos, _),
let ε := (1/5) * δ,
have εpos : 0 < ε := mul_pos (by norm_num) δpos,
-- choose `n` for which `u n < ε`
rcases metric.tendsto_at_top.1 ulim ε εpos with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have u_le_ε : u n ≤ ε,
{ have := hn n (le_refl _),
simp only [real.dist_eq, add_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_zero] at this,
exact le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _) this) },
-- construct a finite subset `s p` of `p` which is `ε`-dense and has cardinal `≤ K n`
have : ∀p:GH_space, ∃s : set (p.rep), ∃N ≤ K n, ∃E : equiv s (fin N),
p ∈ t → univ ⊆ ⋃x∈s, ball x (u n),
{ assume p,
by_cases hp : p ∉ t,
{ have : nonempty (equiv (∅ : set (p.rep)) (fin 0)),
{ rw ← fintype.card_eq, simp },
use [∅, 0, bot_le, choice (this)] },
{ rcases hcov _ (set.not_not_mem.1 hp) n with ⟨s, ⟨scard, scover⟩⟩,
rcases cardinal.lt_omega.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt scard (cardinal.nat_lt_omega _)) with ⟨N, hN⟩,
rw [hN, cardinal.nat_cast_le] at scard,
have : cardinal.mk s = cardinal.mk (fin N), by rw [hN, cardinal.mk_fin],
cases quotient.exact this with E,
use [s, N, scard, E],
simp [hp, scover] } },
choose s N hN E hs using this,
-- Define a function `F` taking values in a finite type and associating to `p` enough data
-- to reconstruct it up to `ε`, namely the (discretized) distances between elements of `s p`.
let M := (floor (ε⁻¹ * max C 0)).to_nat,
let F : GH_space → (Σk:fin ((K n).succ), (fin k → fin k → fin (M.succ))) :=
λp, ⟨⟨N p, lt_of_le_of_lt (hN p) (nat.lt_succ_self _)⟩,
λa b, ⟨min M (floor (ε⁻¹ * dist ((E p).symm a) ((E p).symm b))).to_nat,
lt_of_le_of_lt ( min_le_left _ _) (nat.lt_succ_self _) ⟩ ⟩,
refine ⟨_, by apply_instance, (λp, F p), _⟩,
-- It remains to show that if `F p = F q`, then `p` and `q` are `ε`-close
rintros ⟨p, pt⟩ ⟨q, qt⟩ hpq,
have Npq : N p = N q := (fin.ext_iff _ _).1 (sigma.mk.inj_iff.1 hpq).1,
let Ψ : s p → s q := λx, (E q).symm (fin.cast Npq ((E p) x)),
let Φ : s p → q.rep := λx, Ψ x,
have main : GH_dist (p.rep) (q.rep) ≤ ε + ε/2 + ε,
{ -- to prove the main inequality, argue that `s p` is `ε`-dense in `p`, and `s q` is `ε`-dense
-- in `q`, and `s p` and `s q` are almost isometric. Then closeness follows
-- from `GH_dist_le_of_approx_subsets`
refine GH_dist_le_of_approx_subsets Φ _ _ _,
show ∀x : p.rep, ∃ (y : p.rep) (H : y ∈ s p), dist x y ≤ ε,
{ -- by construction, `s p` is `ε`-dense
assume x,
have : x ∈ ⋃y∈(s p), ball y (u n) := (hs p pt) (mem_univ _),
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 this with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
exact ⟨y, ys, le_trans (le_of_lt hy) u_le_ε⟩ },
show ∀x : q.rep, ∃ (z : s p), dist x (Φ z) ≤ ε,
{ -- by construction, `s q` is `ε`-dense, and it is the range of `Φ`
assume x,
have : x ∈ ⋃y∈(s q), ball y (u n) := (hs q qt) (mem_univ _),
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 this with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
let i := ((E q) ⟨y, ys⟩).1,
let hi := ((E q) ⟨y, ys⟩).2,
have ihi_eq : (⟨i, hi⟩ : fin (N q)) = (E q) ⟨y, ys⟩, by rw fin.ext_iff,
have hiq : i < N q := hi,
have hip : i < N p, { rwa Npq.symm at hiq },
let z := (E p).symm ⟨i, hip⟩,
use z,
have C1 : (E p) z = ⟨i, hip⟩ := (E p).apply_symm_apply ⟨i, hip⟩,
have C2 : fin.cast Npq ⟨i, hip⟩ = ⟨i, hi⟩ := rfl,
have C3 : (E q).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ = ⟨y, ys⟩, by { rw ihi_eq, exact (E q).symm_apply_apply ⟨y, ys⟩ },
have : Φ z = y :=
by { simp only [Φ, Ψ], rw [C1, C2, C3], refl },
rw this,
exact le_trans (le_of_lt hy) u_le_ε },
show ∀x y : s p, abs (dist x y - dist (Φ x) (Φ y)) ≤ ε,
{ /- the distance between `x` and `y` is encoded in `F p`, and the distance between
`Φ x` and `Φ y` (two points of `s q`) is encoded in `F q`, all this up to `ε`.
As `F p = F q`, the distances are almost equal. -/
assume x y,
have : dist (Φ x) (Φ y) = dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y) := rfl,
rw this,
-- introduce `i`, that codes both `x` and `Φ x` in `fin (N p) = fin (N q)`
let i := ((E p) x).1,
have hip : i < N p := ((E p) x).2,
have hiq : i < N q, by rwa Npq at hip,
have i' : i = ((E q) (Ψ x)).1, by { simp [Ψ] },
-- introduce `j`, that codes both `y` and `Φ y` in `fin (N p) = fin (N q)`
let j := ((E p) y).1,
have hjp : j < N p := ((E p) y).2,
have hjq : j < N q, by rwa Npq at hjp,
have j' : j = ((E q) (Ψ y)).1, by { simp [Ψ] },
-- Express `dist x y` in terms of `F p`
have Ap : ((F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩).1 = (floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y)).to_nat := calc
((F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩).1 = ((F p).2 ((E p) x) ((E p) y)).1 :
by { congr; apply (fin.ext_iff _ _).2; refl }
... = min M (floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y)).to_nat :
by simp only [F, (E p).symm_apply_apply]
... = (floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y)).to_nat :
begin
refine min_eq_right (int.to_nat_le_to_nat (floor_mono _)),
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)) (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)),
change dist (x : p.rep) y ≤ C,
refine le_trans (dist_le_diam_of_mem compact_univ.bounded (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)) _,
exact hdiam p pt
end,
-- Express `dist (Φ x) (Φ y)` in terms of `F q`
have Aq : ((F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩).1 = (floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))).to_nat := calc
((F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩).1 = ((F q).2 ((E q) (Ψ x)) ((E q) (Ψ y))).1 :
by { congr; apply (fin.ext_iff _ _).2; [exact i', exact j'] }
... = min M (floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))).to_nat :
by simp only [F, (E q).symm_apply_apply]
... = (floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))).to_nat :
begin
refine min_eq_right (int.to_nat_le_to_nat (floor_mono _)),
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)) (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)),
change dist (Ψ x : q.rep) (Ψ y) ≤ C,
refine le_trans (dist_le_diam_of_mem compact_univ.bounded (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)) _,
exact hdiam q qt
end,
-- use the equality between `F p` and `F q` to deduce that the distances have equal
-- integer parts
have : ((F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩).1 = ((F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩).1,
{ -- we want to `subst hpq` where `hpq : F p = F q`, except that `subst` only works
-- with a constant, so replace `F q` (and everything that depends on it) by a constant `f`
-- then `subst`
revert hiq hjq,
change N q with (F q).1,
generalize_hyp : F q = f at hpq ⊢,
subst hpq,
intros,
refl },
have : floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y) = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)),
{ rw [Ap, Aq] at this,
have D : 0 ≤ floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y) :=
floor_nonneg.2 (mul_nonneg (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)) dist_nonneg),
have D' : floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)) ≥ 0 :=
floor_nonneg.2 (mul_nonneg (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)) dist_nonneg),
rw [← int.to_nat_of_nonneg D, ← int.to_nat_of_nonneg D', this] },
-- deduce that the distances coincide up to `ε`, by a straightforward computation
-- that should be automated
have I := calc
abs (ε⁻¹) * abs (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)) =
abs (ε⁻¹ * (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))) : (abs_mul _ _).symm
... = abs ((ε⁻¹ * dist x y) - (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))) : by { congr, ring }
... ≤ 1 : le_of_lt (abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor this),
calc
abs (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)) = (ε * ε⁻¹) * abs (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)) :
by rw [mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt εpos), one_mul]
... = ε * (abs (ε⁻¹) * abs (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))) :
by rw [abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)), mul_assoc]
... ≤ ε * 1 : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left I (le_of_lt εpos)
... = ε : mul_one _ } },
calc dist p q = GH_dist (p.rep) (q.rep) : dist_GH_dist p q
... ≤ ε + ε/2 + ε : main
... = δ/2 : by { simp [ε], ring }
... < δ : half_lt_self δpos
end
section complete
/- We will show that a sequence `u n` of compact metric spaces satisfying
`dist (u n) (u (n+1)) < 1/2^n` converges, which implies completeness of the Gromov-Hausdorff space.
We need to exhibit the limiting compact metric space. For this, start from
a sequence `X n` of representatives of `u n`, and glue in an optimal way `X n` to `X (n+1)`
for all `n`, in a common metric space. Formally, this is done as follows.
Start from `Y 0 = X 0`. Then, glue `X 0` to `X 1` in an optimal way, yielding a space
`Y 1` (with an embedding of `X 1`). Then, consider an optimal gluing of `X 1` and `X 2`, and
glue it to `Y 1` along their common subspace `X 1`. This gives a new space `Y 2`, with an
embedding of `X 2`. Go on, to obtain a sequence of spaces `Y n`. Let `Z0` be the inductive
limit of the `Y n`, and finally let `Z` be the completion of `Z0`.
The images `X2 n` of `X n` in `Z` are at Hausdorff distance `< 1/2^n` by construction, hence they
form a Cauchy sequence for the Hausdorff distance. By completeness (of `Z`, and therefore of its
set of nonempty compact subsets), they converge to a limit `L`. This is the nonempty
compact metric space we are looking for. -/
variables (X : ℕ → Type) [∀n, metric_space (X n)] [∀n, compact_space (X n)] [∀n, nonempty (X n)]
/-- Auxiliary structure used to glue metric spaces below, recording an isometric embedding
of a type `A` in another metric space. -/
structure aux_gluing_struct (A : Type) [metric_space A] : Type 1 :=
(space : Type)
(metric : metric_space space)
(embed : A → space)
(isom : isometry embed)
/-- Auxiliary sequence of metric spaces, containing copies of `X 0`, ..., `X n`, where each
`X i` is glued to `X (i+1)` in an optimal way. The space at step `n+1` is obtained from the space
at step `n` by adding `X (n+1)`, glued in an optimal way to the `X n` already sitting there. -/
def aux_gluing (n : ℕ) : aux_gluing_struct (X n) := nat.rec_on n
{ space := X 0,
metric := by apply_instance,
embed := id,
isom := λx y, rfl }
(λn a, by letI : metric_space a.space := a.metric; exact
{ space := glue_space a.isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ)),
metric := metric.metric_space_glue_space a.isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ)),
embed := (to_glue_r a.isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ)))
∘ (optimal_GH_injr (X n) (X n.succ)),
isom := (to_glue_r_isometry _ _).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injr (X n) (X n.succ)) })
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff space is complete. -/
instance : complete_space (GH_space) :=
begin
have : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 < ((1:ℝ) / 2) ^ n, by { apply _root_.pow_pos, norm_num },
-- start from a sequence of nonempty compact metric spaces within distance `1/2^n` of each other
refine metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (λn, (1/2)^n) this (λu hu, _),
-- `X n` is a representative of `u n`
let X := λn, (u n).rep,
-- glue them together successively in an optimal way, getting a sequence of metric spaces `Y n`
let Y := aux_gluing X,
letI : ∀n, metric_space (Y n).space := λn, (Y n).metric,
have E : ∀n:ℕ, glue_space (Y n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ)) = (Y n.succ).space :=
λn, by { simp [Y, aux_gluing], refl },
let c := λn, cast (E n),
have ic : ∀n, isometry (c n) := λn x y, rfl,
-- there is a canonical embedding of `Y n` in `Y (n+1)`, by construction
let f : Πn, (Y n).space → (Y n.succ).space :=
λn, (c n) ∘ (to_glue_l (aux_gluing X n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))),
have I : ∀n, isometry (f n),
{ assume n,
apply isometry.comp,
{ assume x y, refl },
{ apply to_glue_l_isometry } },
-- consider the inductive limit `Z0` of the `Y n`, and then its completion `Z`
let Z0 := metric.inductive_limit I,
let Z := uniform_space.completion Z0,
let Φ := to_inductive_limit I,
let coeZ := (coe : Z0 → Z),
-- let `X2 n` be the image of `X n` in the space `Z`
let X2 := λn, range (coeZ ∘ (Φ n) ∘ (Y n).embed),
have isom : ∀n, isometry (coeZ ∘ (Φ n) ∘ (Y n).embed),
{ assume n,
apply isometry.comp completion.coe_isometry _,
apply isometry.comp _ (Y n).isom,
apply to_inductive_limit_isometry },
-- The Hausdorff distance of `X2 n` and `X2 (n+1)` is by construction the distance between
-- `u n` and `u (n+1)`, therefore bounded by `1/2^n`
have D2 : ∀n, Hausdorff_dist (X2 n) (X2 n.succ) < (1/2)^n,
{ assume n,
have X2n : X2 n = range ((coeZ ∘ (Φ n.succ) ∘ (c n)
∘ (to_glue_r (Y n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))))
∘ (optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))),
{ change X2 n = range (coeZ ∘ (Φ n.succ) ∘ (c n)
∘ (to_glue_r (Y n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ)))
∘ (optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))),
simp only [X2, Φ],
rw [← to_inductive_limit_commute I],
simp only [f],
rw ← to_glue_commute },
rw range_comp at X2n,
have X2nsucc : X2 n.succ = range ((coeZ ∘ (Φ n.succ) ∘ (c n)
∘ (to_glue_r (Y n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))))
∘ (optimal_GH_injr (X n) (X n.succ))), by refl,
rw range_comp at X2nsucc,
rw [X2n, X2nsucc, Hausdorff_dist_image, Hausdorff_dist_optimal, ← dist_GH_dist],
{ exact hu n n n.succ (le_refl n) (le_succ n) },
{ apply isometry.comp completion.coe_isometry _,
apply isometry.comp _ ((ic n).comp (to_glue_r_isometry _ _)),
apply to_inductive_limit_isometry } },
-- consider `X2 n` as a member `X3 n` of the type of nonempty compact subsets of `Z`, which
-- is a metric space
let X3 : ℕ → nonempty_compacts Z := λn, ⟨X2 n,
⟨range_nonempty _, compact_range (isom n).continuous ⟩⟩,
-- `X3 n` is a Cauchy sequence by construction, as the successive distances are
-- bounded by `(1/2)^n`
have : cauchy_seq X3,
{ refine cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric (1/2) 1 (by norm_num) (λn, _),
rw one_mul,
exact le_of_lt (D2 n) },
-- therefore, it converges to a limit `L`
rcases cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete this with ⟨L, hL⟩,
-- the images of `X3 n` in the Gromov-Hausdorff space converge to the image of `L`
have M : tendsto (λn, (X3 n).to_GH_space) at_top (𝓝 L.to_GH_space) :=
tendsto.comp (to_GH_space_continuous.tendsto _) hL,
-- By construction, the image of `X3 n` in the Gromov-Hausdorff space is `u n`.
have : ∀n, (X3 n).to_GH_space = u n,
{ assume n,
rw [nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space, ← (u n).to_GH_space_rep,
to_GH_space_eq_to_GH_space_iff_isometric],
constructor,
convert (isom n).isometric_on_range.symm,
},
-- Finally, we have proved the convergence of `u n`
exact ⟨L.to_GH_space, by simpa [this] using M⟩
end
end complete--section
end Gromov_Hausdorff --namespace
|
fd224e8401388da5ec82e305436720d1e72ca104 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/analysis/special_functions/exp_deriv.lean | 828a3c2d1437372ca4f5821f76a2507ac795915c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,092 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import analysis.complex.real_deriv
/-!
# Complex and real exponential
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we prove that `complex.exp` and `real.exp` are infinitely smooth functions.
## Tags
exp, derivative
-/
noncomputable theory
open filter asymptotics set function
open_locale classical topology
namespace complex
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_algebra 𝕜 ℂ]
/-- The complex exponential is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `exp x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_exp (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at exp (exp x) x :=
begin
rw has_deriv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero,
have : (1 : ℕ) < 2 := by norm_num,
refine (is_O.of_bound (‖exp x‖) _).trans_is_o (is_o_pow_id this),
filter_upwards [metric.ball_mem_nhds (0 : ℂ) zero_lt_one],
simp only [metric.mem_ball, dist_zero_right, norm_pow],
exact λ z hz, exp_bound_sq x z hz.le,
end
lemma differentiable_exp : differentiable 𝕜 exp :=
λ x, (has_deriv_at_exp x).differentiable_at.restrict_scalars 𝕜
lemma differentiable_at_exp {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at 𝕜 exp x :=
differentiable_exp x
@[simp] lemma deriv_exp : deriv exp = exp :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_exp x).deriv
@[simp] lemma iter_deriv_exp : ∀ n : ℕ, (deriv^[n] exp) = exp
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [iterate_succ_apply, deriv_exp, iter_deriv_exp n]
lemma cont_diff_exp : ∀ {n}, cont_diff 𝕜 n exp :=
begin
refine cont_diff_all_iff_nat.2 (λ n, _),
have : cont_diff ℂ ↑n exp,
{ induction n with n ihn,
{ exact cont_diff_zero.2 continuous_exp },
{ rw cont_diff_succ_iff_deriv,
use differentiable_exp,
rwa deriv_exp }, },
exact this.restrict_scalars 𝕜
end
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_exp (x : ℂ) : has_strict_deriv_at exp (exp x) x :=
cont_diff_exp.cont_diff_at.has_strict_deriv_at' (has_deriv_at_exp x) le_rfl
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_real (x : ℂ) :
has_strict_fderiv_at exp (exp x • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_exp x).complex_to_real_fderiv
end complex
section
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_algebra 𝕜 ℂ]
{f : 𝕜 → ℂ} {f' : ℂ} {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜}
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.cexp (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) (complex.exp (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.cexp (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) (complex.exp (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cexp (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) (complex.exp (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_cexp (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) s x = complex.exp (f x) * deriv_within f s x :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cexp.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_cexp (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) x = complex.exp (f x) * deriv f x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cexp.deriv
end
section
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_algebra 𝕜 ℂ]
{E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] {f : E → ℂ} {f' : E →L[𝕜] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : set E}
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.cexp (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) (complex.exp (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.cexp (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) (complex.exp (f x) • f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.cexp (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) (complex.exp (f x) • f') x :=
has_fderiv_within_at_univ.1 $ hf.has_fderiv_within_at.cexp
lemma differentiable_within_at.cexp (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.cexp.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.cexp (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.cexp.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.cexp (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) s :=
λ x h, (hc x h).cexp
@[simp] lemma differentiable.cexp (hc : differentiable 𝕜 f) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) :=
λ x, (hc x).cexp
lemma cont_diff.cexp {n} (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) :=
complex.cont_diff_exp.comp h
lemma cont_diff_at.cexp {n} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) x :=
complex.cont_diff_exp.cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma cont_diff_on.cexp {n} (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) s :=
complex.cont_diff_exp.comp_cont_diff_on hf
lemma cont_diff_within_at.cexp {n} (hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) s x :=
complex.cont_diff_exp.cont_diff_at.comp_cont_diff_within_at x hf
end
namespace real
variables {x y z : ℝ}
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_exp (x : ℝ) : has_strict_deriv_at exp (exp x) x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_exp x).real_of_complex
lemma has_deriv_at_exp (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at exp (exp x) x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_exp x).real_of_complex
lemma cont_diff_exp {n} : cont_diff ℝ n exp :=
complex.cont_diff_exp.real_of_complex
lemma differentiable_exp : differentiable ℝ exp :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_exp x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_exp : differentiable_at ℝ exp x :=
differentiable_exp x
@[simp] lemma deriv_exp : deriv exp = exp :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_exp x).deriv
@[simp] lemma iter_deriv_exp : ∀ n : ℕ, (deriv^[n] exp) = exp
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [iterate_succ_apply, deriv_exp, iter_deriv_exp n]
end real
section
/-! Register lemmas for the derivatives of the composition of `real.exp` with a differentiable
function, for standalone use and use with `simp`. -/
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' x : ℝ} {s : set ℝ}
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.exp (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, real.exp (f x)) (real.exp (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.exp (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.exp (f x)) (real.exp (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.exp (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.exp (f x)) (real.exp (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_exp (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.exp (f x)) s x = real.exp (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.exp.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_exp (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.exp (f x)) x = real.exp (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.exp.deriv
end
section
/-! Register lemmas for the derivatives of the composition of `real.exp` with a differentiable
function, for standalone use and use with `simp`. -/
variables {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] {f : E → ℝ} {f' : E →L[ℝ] ℝ}
{x : E} {s : set E}
lemma cont_diff.exp {n} (hf : cont_diff ℝ n f) :
cont_diff ℝ n (λ x, real.exp (f x)) :=
real.cont_diff_exp.comp hf
lemma cont_diff_at.exp {n} (hf : cont_diff_at ℝ n f x) :
cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ x, real.exp (f x)) x :=
real.cont_diff_exp.cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma cont_diff_on.exp {n} (hf : cont_diff_on ℝ n f s) :
cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ x, real.exp (f x)) s :=
real.cont_diff_exp.comp_cont_diff_on hf
lemma cont_diff_within_at.exp {n} (hf : cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x) :
cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ x, real.exp (f x)) s x :=
real.cont_diff_exp.cont_diff_at.comp_cont_diff_within_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.exp (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, real.exp (f x)) (real.exp (f x) • f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.exp (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, real.exp (f x)) (real.exp (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.exp (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, real.exp (f x)) (real.exp (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_exp (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.exp (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.exp (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.exp.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.exp (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.exp (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.exp.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.exp (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.exp (f x)) s :=
λ x h, (hc x h).exp
@[simp] lemma differentiable.exp (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.exp (f x)) :=
λ x, (hc x).exp
lemma fderiv_within_exp (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
fderiv_within ℝ (λx, real.exp (f x)) s x = real.exp (f x) • (fderiv_within ℝ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.exp.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_exp (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
fderiv ℝ (λx, real.exp (f x)) x = real.exp (f x) • (fderiv ℝ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.exp.fderiv
end
|
5edc973e086bf28f8e96ee9c916f61913317ae60 | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /tests/lean/run/section5.lean | fa6873b9ec5e928e0351127e166f90e88e37ef62 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 268 | lean | section foo
parameter A : Type
variable a : A
definition foo := a
#check foo
structure [class] point :=
(x : A) (y : A)
end foo
#check foo
attribute [instance]
definition point_nat : point nat :=
point.mk nat.zero nat.zero
#print classes
#check point
|
4399b10b8d351ffb6fbe20ec877189daf14e41bf | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/foldConsts.lean | 52fcc1e880a15220d7da34f8e8c225b19ed9069b | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 283 | lean | import Lean
open Lean
partial def mkTerm : Nat → Expr
| 0 => mkApp (mkConst `a) (mkConst `b)
| n+1 => mkApp (mkTerm n) (mkTerm n)
def collectConsts (e : Expr) : List Name :=
e.foldConsts [] List.cons
def tst1 : IO Unit :=
IO.println $ collectConsts (mkTerm 1000)
#eval tst1
|
5cfb4230101c1dd63e0ce05fb4c211039360c822 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/ring_theory/power_series/well_known.lean | 855650e55f89d0751f6c0a2bbf7ff5cd8bc76b2a | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,155 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.ring_theory.power_series.basic
import Mathlib.data.nat.parity
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Definition of well-known power series
In this file we define the following power series:
* `power_series.inv_units_sub`: given `u : units R`, this is the series for `1 / (u - x)`.
It is given by `∑ n, x ^ n /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)`.
* `power_series.sin`, `power_series.cos`, `power_series.exp` : power series for sin, cosine, and
exponential functions.
-/
namespace power_series
/-- The power series for `1 / (u - x)`. -/
def inv_units_sub {R : Type u_1} [ring R] (u : units R) : power_series R :=
mk fun (n : ℕ) => 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)
@[simp] theorem coeff_inv_units_sub {R : Type u_1} [ring R] (u : units R) (n : ℕ) : coe_fn (coeff R n) (inv_units_sub u) = 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1) :=
coeff_mk n fun (n : ℕ) => 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)
@[simp] theorem constant_coeff_inv_units_sub {R : Type u_1} [ring R] (u : units R) : coe_fn (constant_coeff R) (inv_units_sub u) = 1 /ₚ u := sorry
@[simp] theorem inv_units_sub_mul_X {R : Type u_1} [ring R] (u : units R) : inv_units_sub u * X = inv_units_sub u * coe_fn (C R) ↑u - 1 := sorry
@[simp] theorem inv_units_sub_mul_sub {R : Type u_1} [ring R] (u : units R) : inv_units_sub u * (coe_fn (C R) ↑u - X) = 1 := sorry
theorem map_inv_units_sub {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [ring R] [ring S] (f : R →+* S) (u : units R) : coe_fn (map f) (inv_units_sub u) = inv_units_sub (coe_fn (units.map ↑f) u) := sorry
/-- Power series for the exponential function at zero. -/
def exp (A : Type u_1) [ring A] [algebra ℚ A] : power_series A :=
mk fun (n : ℕ) => coe_fn (algebra_map ℚ A) (1 / ↑(nat.factorial n))
/-- Power series for the sine function at zero. -/
def sin (A : Type u_1) [ring A] [algebra ℚ A] : power_series A :=
mk fun (n : ℕ) => ite (even n) 0 (coe_fn (algebra_map ℚ A) ((-1) ^ (n / bit0 1) / ↑(nat.factorial n)))
/-- Power series for the cosine function at zero. -/
def cos (A : Type u_1) [ring A] [algebra ℚ A] : power_series A :=
mk fun (n : ℕ) => ite (even n) (coe_fn (algebra_map ℚ A) ((-1) ^ (n / bit0 1) / ↑(nat.factorial n))) 0
@[simp] theorem coeff_exp {A : Type u_1} [ring A] [algebra ℚ A] (n : ℕ) : coe_fn (coeff A n) (exp A) = coe_fn (algebra_map ℚ A) (1 / ↑(nat.factorial n)) :=
coeff_mk n fun (n : ℕ) => coe_fn (algebra_map ℚ A) (1 / ↑(nat.factorial n))
@[simp] theorem map_exp {A : Type u_1} {A' : Type u_2} [ring A] [ring A'] [algebra ℚ A] [algebra ℚ A'] (f : A →+* A') : coe_fn (map f) (exp A) = exp A' := sorry
@[simp] theorem map_sin {A : Type u_1} {A' : Type u_2} [ring A] [ring A'] [algebra ℚ A] [algebra ℚ A'] (f : A →+* A') : coe_fn (map f) (sin A) = sin A' := sorry
@[simp] theorem map_cos {A : Type u_1} {A' : Type u_2} [ring A] [ring A'] [algebra ℚ A] [algebra ℚ A'] (f : A →+* A') : coe_fn (map f) (cos A) = cos A' := sorry
|
6e6cef1682f10bbfa4f302778d642136de12bd05 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/linear_algebra/direct_sum/finsupp_auto.lean | 5947e6fb17d0f8bce4c8c34d87f048e40f60880d | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,802 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.linear_algebra.finsupp
import Mathlib.linear_algebra.direct_sum.tensor_product
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u u_1 v u_2 u_3 u_4 u_5
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Results on direct sums and finitely supported functions.
1. The linear equivalence between finitely supported functions `ι →₀ M` and
the direct sum of copies of `M` indexed by `ι`.
2. The tensor product of ι →₀ M and κ →₀ N is linearly equivalent to (ι × κ) →₀ (M ⊗ N).
-/
/-- The finitely supported functions ι →₀ M are in linear equivalence with the direct sum of
copies of M indexed by ι. -/
def finsupp_lequiv_direct_sum (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
(ι : Type u_1) [DecidableEq ι] : linear_equiv R (ι →₀ M) (direct_sum ι fun (i : ι) => M) :=
linear_equiv.of_linear
(coe_fn finsupp.lsum
((fun (this : ι → linear_map R M (direct_sum ι fun (i : ι) => M)) => this)
(direct_sum.lof R ι fun (i : ι) => M)))
(direct_sum.to_module R ι (ι →₀ M) finsupp.lsingle) sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem finsupp_lequiv_direct_sum_single (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [ring R]
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] (ι : Type u_1) [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (m : M) :
coe_fn (finsupp_lequiv_direct_sum R M ι) (finsupp.single i m) =
coe_fn (direct_sum.lof R ι (fun (i : ι) => M) i) m :=
finsupp.sum_single_index
(linear_map.map_zero
((fun (this : ι → linear_map R M (direct_sum ι fun (i : ι) => M)) => this)
(direct_sum.lof R ι fun (i : ι) => M) i))
@[simp] theorem finsupp_lequiv_direct_sum_symm_lof (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [ring R]
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] (ι : Type u_1) [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (m : M) :
coe_fn (linear_equiv.symm (finsupp_lequiv_direct_sum R M ι))
(coe_fn (direct_sum.lof R ι (fun (i : ι) => M) i) m) =
finsupp.single i m :=
direct_sum.to_module_lof R i m
/-- The tensor product of ι →₀ M and κ →₀ N is linearly equivalent to (ι × κ) →₀ (M ⊗ N). -/
def finsupp_tensor_finsupp (R : Type u_1) (M : Type u_2) (N : Type u_3) (ι : Type u_4)
(κ : Type u_5) [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [add_comm_group N] [module R N] :
linear_equiv R (tensor_product R (ι →₀ M) (κ →₀ N)) (ι × κ →₀ tensor_product R M N) :=
linear_equiv.trans
(tensor_product.congr (finsupp_lequiv_direct_sum R M ι) (finsupp_lequiv_direct_sum R N κ))
(linear_equiv.trans (tensor_product.direct_sum R ι κ (fun (i : ι) => M) fun (i : κ) => N)
(linear_equiv.symm (finsupp_lequiv_direct_sum R (tensor_product R M N) (ι × κ))))
@[simp] theorem finsupp_tensor_finsupp_single (R : Type u_1) (M : Type u_2) (N : Type u_3)
(ι : Type u_4) (κ : Type u_5) [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [add_comm_group N]
[module R N] (i : ι) (m : M) (k : κ) (n : N) :
coe_fn (finsupp_tensor_finsupp R M N ι κ)
(tensor_product.tmul R (finsupp.single i m) (finsupp.single k n)) =
finsupp.single (i, k) (tensor_product.tmul R m n) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem finsupp_tensor_finsupp_symm_single (R : Type u_1) (M : Type u_2) (N : Type u_3)
(ι : Type u_4) (κ : Type u_5) [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [add_comm_group N]
[module R N] (i : ι × κ) (m : M) (n : N) :
coe_fn (linear_equiv.symm (finsupp_tensor_finsupp R M N ι κ))
(finsupp.single i (tensor_product.tmul R m n)) =
tensor_product.tmul R (finsupp.single (prod.fst i) m) (finsupp.single (prod.snd i) n) :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
b84b3ba65a04340d1d97332b28fd496ed3c5a264 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/geometry/manifold/partition_of_unity.lean | 95571523195fef607b76ebff4f1e647ca37a3fec | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,907 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import topology.paracompact
import topology.shrinking_lemma
import geometry.manifold.bump_function
import topology.partition_of_unity
/-!
# Smooth partition of unity
In this file we define two structures, `smooth_bump_covering` and `smooth_partition_of_unity`. Both
structures describe coverings of a set by a locally finite family of supports of smooth functions
with some additional properties. The former structure is mostly useful as an intermediate step in
the construction of a smooth partition of unity but some proofs that traditionally deal with a
partition of unity can use a `smooth_bump_covering` as well.
Given a real manifold `M` and its subset `s`, a `smooth_bump_covering ι I M s` is a collection of
`smooth_bump_function`s `f i` indexed by `i : ι` such that
* the center of each `f i` belongs to `s`;
* the family of sets `support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each `x ∈ s`, there exists `i : ι` such that `f i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`.
In the same settings, a `smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s` is a collection of smooth nonnegative
functions `f i : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯`, `i : ι`, such that
* the family of sets `support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each `x ∈ s`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` equals one;
* for each `x`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` is less than or equal to one.
We say that `f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s` is *subordinate* to a map `U : M → set M` if for each
index `i`, we have `closure (support (f i)) ⊆ U (f i).c`. This notion is a bit more general than
being subordinate to an open covering of `M`, because we make no assumption about the way `U x`
depends on `x`.
We prove that on a smooth finitely dimensional real manifold with `σ`-compact Hausdorff topology,
for any `U : M → set M` such that `∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x` there exists a `smooth_bump_covering ι I M s`
subordinate to `U`. Then we use this fact to prove a similar statement about smooth partitions of
unity.
## Implementation notes
## TODO
* Build a framework for to transfer local definitions to global using partition of unity and use it
to define, e.g., the integral of a differential form over a manifold.
## Tags
smooth bump function, partition of unity
-/
universes uι uE uH uM
open function filter finite_dimensional set
open_locale topological_space manifold classical filter big_operators
noncomputable theory
variables {ι : Type uι}
{E : Type uE} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [finite_dimensional ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [topological_space H] (I : model_with_corners ℝ E H)
{M : Type uM} [topological_space M] [charted_space H M] [smooth_manifold_with_corners I M]
/-!
### Covering by supports of smooth bump functions
In this section we define `smooth_bump_covering ι I M s` to be a collection of
`smooth_bump_function`s such that their supports is a locally finite family of sets and for each `x
∈ s` some function `f i` from the collection is equal to `1` in a neighborhood of `x`. A covering of
this type is useful to construct a smooth partition of unity and can be used instead of a partition
of unity in some proofs.
We prove that on a smooth finite dimensional real manifold with `σ`-compact Hausdorff topology, for
any `U : M → set M` such that `∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x` there exists a `smooth_bump_covering ι I M s`
subordinate to `U`. Then we use this fact to prove a version of the Whitney embedding theorem: any
compact real manifold can be embedded into `ℝ^n` for large enough `n`. -/
variables (ι M)
/-- We say that a collection of `smooth_bump_function`s is a `smooth_bump_covering` of a set `s` if
* `(f i).c ∈ s` for all `i`;
* the family `λ i, support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each point `x ∈ s` there exists `i` such that `f i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`;
in other words, `x` belongs to the interior of `{y | f i y = 1}`;
If `M` is a finite dimensional real manifold which is a sigma-compact Hausdorff topological space,
then for every covering `U : M → set M`, `∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x`, there exists a `smooth_bump_covering`
subordinate to `U`, see `smooth_bump_covering.exists_is_subordinate`.
This covering can be used, e.g., to construct a partition of unity and to prove the weak
Whitney embedding theorem. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure smooth_bump_covering (s : set M := univ) :=
(c : ι → M)
(to_fun : Π i, smooth_bump_function I (c i))
(c_mem' : ∀ i, c i ∈ s)
(locally_finite' : locally_finite (λ i, support (to_fun i)))
(eventually_eq_one' : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, to_fun i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1)
/-- We say that that a collection of functions form a smooth partition of unity on a set `s` if
* all functions are infinitely smooth and nonnegative;
* the family `λ i, support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for all `x ∈ s` the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` equals one;
* for all `x`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` is less than or equal to one. -/
structure smooth_partition_of_unity (s : set M := univ) :=
(to_fun : ι → C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯)
(locally_finite' : locally_finite (λ i, support (to_fun i)))
(nonneg' : ∀ i x, 0 ≤ to_fun i x)
(sum_eq_one' : ∀ x ∈ s, ∑ᶠ i, to_fun i x = 1)
(sum_le_one' : ∀ x, ∑ᶠ i, to_fun i x ≤ 1)
variables {ι I M}
namespace smooth_partition_of_unity
variables {s : set M} (f : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s)
instance {s : set M} : has_coe_to_fun (smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s) :=
⟨λ _, ι → C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯, smooth_partition_of_unity.to_fun⟩
protected lemma locally_finite : locally_finite (λ i, support (f i)) :=
f.locally_finite'
lemma nonneg (i : ι) (x : M) : 0 ≤ f i x := f.nonneg' i x
lemma sum_eq_one {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x = 1 := f.sum_eq_one' x hx
lemma sum_le_one (x : M) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x ≤ 1 := f.sum_le_one' x
/-- Reinterpret a smooth partition of unity as a continuous partition of unity. -/
def to_partition_of_unity : partition_of_unity ι M s :=
{ to_fun := λ i, f i, .. f }
lemma smooth_sum : smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (λ x, ∑ᶠ i, f i x) :=
smooth_finsum (λ i, (f i).smooth) f.locally_finite
lemma le_one (i : ι) (x : M) : f i x ≤ 1 := f.to_partition_of_unity.le_one i x
lemma sum_nonneg (x : M) : 0 ≤ ∑ᶠ i, f i x := f.to_partition_of_unity.sum_nonneg x
/-- A smooth partition of unity `f i` is subordinate to a family of sets `U i` indexed by the same
type if for each `i` the closure of the support of `f i` is a subset of `U i`. -/
def is_subordinate (f : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s) (U : ι → set M) :=
∀ i, closure (support (f i)) ⊆ U i
@[simp] lemma is_subordinate_to_partition_of_unity {f : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s}
{U : ι → set M} :
f.to_partition_of_unity.is_subordinate U ↔ f.is_subordinate U :=
iff.rfl
alias is_subordinate_to_partition_of_unity ↔
_ smooth_partition_of_unity.is_subordinate.to_partition_of_unity
end smooth_partition_of_unity
namespace bump_covering
-- Repeat variables to drop [finite_dimensional ℝ E] and [smooth_manifold_with_corners I M]
lemma smooth_to_partition_of_unity {E : Type uE} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [topological_space H] {I : model_with_corners ℝ E H}
{M : Type uM} [topological_space M] [charted_space H M] {s : set M}
(f : bump_covering ι M s) (hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) (i : ι) :
smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f.to_partition_of_unity i) :=
(hf i).mul $ smooth_finprod_cond (λ j _, smooth_const.sub (hf j)) $
by { simp only [mul_support_one_sub], exact f.locally_finite }
variables {s : set M}
/-- A `bump_covering` such that all functions in this covering are smooth generates a smooth
partition of unity.
In our formalization, not every `f : bump_covering ι M s` with smooth functions `f i` is a
`smooth_bump_covering`; instead, a `smooth_bump_covering` is a covering by supports of
`smooth_bump_function`s. So, we define `bump_covering.to_smooth_partition_of_unity`, then reuse it
in `smooth_bump_covering.to_smooth_partition_of_unity`. -/
def to_smooth_partition_of_unity (f : bump_covering ι M s) (hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) :
smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s :=
{ to_fun := λ i, ⟨f.to_partition_of_unity i, f.smooth_to_partition_of_unity hf i⟩,
.. f.to_partition_of_unity }
@[simp] lemma to_smooth_partition_of_unity_to_partition_of_unity (f : bump_covering ι M s)
(hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) :
(f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf).to_partition_of_unity = f.to_partition_of_unity :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_smooth_partition_of_unity (f : bump_covering ι M s)
(hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) (i : ι) :
⇑(f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf i) = f.to_partition_of_unity i :=
rfl
lemma is_subordinate.to_smooth_partition_of_unity {f : bump_covering ι M s}
{U : ι → set M} (h : f.is_subordinate U) (hf : ∀ i, smooth I 𝓘(ℝ) (f i)) :
(f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf).is_subordinate U :=
h.to_partition_of_unity
end bump_covering
namespace smooth_bump_covering
variables {s : set M} {U : M → set M} (fs : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s) {I}
instance : has_coe_to_fun (smooth_bump_covering ι I M s) := ⟨_, to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (c : ι → M) (to_fun : Π i, smooth_bump_function I (c i))
(h₁ h₂ h₃) : ⇑(mk c to_fun h₁ h₂ h₃ : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s) = to_fun :=
rfl
/--
We say that `f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s` is *subordinate* to a map `U : M → set M` if for each
index `i`, we have `closure (support (f i)) ⊆ U (f i).c`. This notion is a bit more general than
being subordinate to an open covering of `M`, because we make no assumption about the way `U x`
depends on `x`.
-/
def is_subordinate {s : set M} (f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s) (U : M → set M) :=
∀ i, closure (support $ f i) ⊆ U (f.c i)
lemma is_subordinate.support_subset {fs : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s} {U : M → set M}
(h : fs.is_subordinate U) (i : ι) :
support (fs i) ⊆ U (fs.c i) :=
subset.trans subset_closure (h i)
variable (I)
/-- Let `M` be a smooth manifold with corners modelled on a finite dimensional real vector space.
Suppose also that `M` is a Hausdorff `σ`-compact topological space. Let `s` be a closed set
in `M` and `U : M → set M` be a collection of sets such that `U x ∈ 𝓝 x` for every `x ∈ s`.
Then there exists a smooth bump covering of `s` that is subordinate to `U`. -/
lemma exists_is_subordinate [t2_space M] [sigma_compact_space M] (hs : is_closed s)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ (ι : Type uM) (f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s), f.is_subordinate U :=
begin
-- First we deduce some missing instances
haveI : locally_compact_space H := I.locally_compact,
haveI : locally_compact_space M := charted_space.locally_compact H,
haveI : normal_space M := normal_of_paracompact_t2,
-- Next we choose a covering by supports of smooth bump functions
have hB := λ x hx, smooth_bump_function.nhds_basis_support I (hU x hx),
rcases refinement_of_locally_compact_sigma_compact_of_nhds_basis_set hs hB
with ⟨ι, c, f, hf, hsub', hfin⟩, choose hcs hfU using hf,
/- Then we use the shrinking lemma to get a covering by smaller open -/
rcases exists_subset_Union_closed_subset hs (λ i, (f i).open_support)
(λ x hx, hfin.point_finite x) hsub' with ⟨V, hsV, hVc, hVf⟩,
choose r hrR hr using λ i, (f i).exists_r_pos_lt_subset_ball (hVc i) (hVf i),
refine ⟨ι, ⟨c, λ i, (f i).update_r (r i) (hrR i), hcs, _, λ x hx, _⟩, λ i, _⟩,
{ simpa only [smooth_bump_function.support_update_r] },
{ refine (mem_Union.1 $ hsV hx).imp (λ i hi, _),
exact ((f i).update_r _ _).eventually_eq_one_of_dist_lt
((f i).support_subset_source $ hVf _ hi) (hr i hi).2 },
{ simpa only [coe_mk, smooth_bump_function.support_update_r] using hfU i }
end
variables {I M}
protected lemma locally_finite : locally_finite (λ i, support (fs i)) := fs.locally_finite'
protected lemma point_finite (x : M) : {i | fs i x ≠ 0}.finite :=
fs.locally_finite.point_finite x
lemma mem_chart_at_source_of_eq_one {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 1) :
x ∈ (chart_at H (fs.c i)).source :=
(fs i).support_subset_source $ by simp [h]
lemma mem_ext_chart_at_source_of_eq_one {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 1) :
x ∈ (ext_chart_at I (fs.c i)).source :=
by { rw ext_chart_at_source, exact fs.mem_chart_at_source_of_eq_one h }
/-- Index of a bump function such that `fs i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`. -/
def ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : ι := (fs.eventually_eq_one' x hx).some
lemma eventually_eq_one (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : fs (fs.ind x hx) =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 :=
(fs.eventually_eq_one' x hx).some_spec
lemma apply_ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : fs (fs.ind x hx) x = 1 :=
(fs.eventually_eq_one x hx).eq_of_nhds
lemma mem_support_ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : x ∈ support (fs $ fs.ind x hx) :=
by simp [fs.apply_ind x hx]
lemma mem_chart_at_ind_source (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) :
x ∈ (chart_at H (fs.c (fs.ind x hx))).source :=
fs.mem_chart_at_source_of_eq_one (fs.apply_ind x hx)
lemma mem_ext_chart_at_ind_source (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) :
x ∈ (ext_chart_at I (fs.c (fs.ind x hx))).source :=
fs.mem_ext_chart_at_source_of_eq_one (fs.apply_ind x hx)
/-- The index type of a `smooth_bump_covering` of a compact manifold is finite. -/
protected def fintype [compact_space M] : fintype ι :=
fs.locally_finite.fintype_of_compact $ λ i, (fs i).nonempty_support
variable [t2_space M]
/-- Reinterpret a `smooth_bump_covering` as a continuous `bump_covering`. Note that not every
`f : bump_covering ι M s` with smooth functions `f i` is a `smooth_bump_covering`. -/
def to_bump_covering : bump_covering ι M s :=
{ to_fun := λ i, ⟨fs i, (fs i).continuous⟩,
locally_finite' := fs.locally_finite,
nonneg' := λ i x, (fs i).nonneg,
le_one' := λ i x, (fs i).le_one,
eventually_eq_one' := fs.eventually_eq_one' }
@[simp] lemma is_subordinate_to_bump_covering {f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s} {U : M → set M} :
f.to_bump_covering.is_subordinate (λ i, U (f.c i)) ↔ f.is_subordinate U :=
iff.rfl
alias is_subordinate_to_bump_covering ↔
_ smooth_bump_covering.is_subordinate.to_bump_covering
/-- Every `smooth_bump_covering` defines a smooth partition of unity. -/
def to_smooth_partition_of_unity : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s :=
fs.to_bump_covering.to_smooth_partition_of_unity (λ i, (fs i).smooth)
lemma to_smooth_partition_of_unity_apply (i : ι) (x : M) :
fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i x = fs i x * ∏ᶠ j (hj : well_ordering_rel j i), (1 - fs j x) :=
rfl
lemma to_smooth_partition_of_unity_eq_mul_prod (i : ι) (x : M) (t : finset ι)
(ht : ∀ j, well_ordering_rel j i → fs j x ≠ 0 → j ∈ t) :
fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i x =
fs i x * ∏ j in t.filter (λ j, well_ordering_rel j i), (1 - fs j x) :=
fs.to_bump_covering.to_partition_of_unity_eq_mul_prod i x t ht
lemma exists_finset_to_smooth_partition_of_unity_eventually_eq (i : ι) (x : M) :
∃ t : finset ι, fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i =ᶠ[𝓝 x]
fs i * ∏ j in t.filter (λ j, well_ordering_rel j i), (1 - fs j) :=
fs.to_bump_covering.exists_finset_to_partition_of_unity_eventually_eq i x
lemma to_smooth_partition_of_unity_zero_of_zero {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 0) :
fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i x = 0 :=
fs.to_bump_covering.to_partition_of_unity_zero_of_zero h
lemma support_to_smooth_partition_of_unity_subset (i : ι) :
support (fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i) ⊆ support (fs i) :=
fs.to_bump_covering.support_to_partition_of_unity_subset i
lemma is_subordinate.to_smooth_partition_of_unity {f : smooth_bump_covering ι I M s} {U : M → set M}
(h : f.is_subordinate U) :
f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity.is_subordinate (λ i, U (f.c i)) :=
h.to_bump_covering.to_partition_of_unity
lemma sum_to_smooth_partition_of_unity_eq (x : M) :
∑ᶠ i, fs.to_smooth_partition_of_unity i x = 1 - ∏ᶠ i, (1 - fs i x) :=
fs.to_bump_covering.sum_to_partition_of_unity_eq x
end smooth_bump_covering
variable (I)
/-- Given two disjoint closed sets in a Hausdorff σ-compact finite dimensional manifold, there
exists an infinitely smooth function that is equal to `0` on one of them and is equal to one on the
other. -/
lemma exists_smooth_zero_one_of_closed [t2_space M] [sigma_compact_space M] {s t : set M}
(hs : is_closed s) (ht : is_closed t) (hd : disjoint s t) :
∃ f : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯, eq_on f 0 s ∧ eq_on f 1 t ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
begin
have : ∀ x ∈ t, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x, from λ x hx, hs.is_open_compl.mem_nhds (disjoint_right.1 hd hx),
rcases smooth_bump_covering.exists_is_subordinate I ht this with ⟨ι, f, hf⟩,
set g := f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity,
refine ⟨⟨_, g.smooth_sum⟩, λ x hx, _, λ x, g.sum_eq_one, λ x, ⟨g.sum_nonneg x, g.sum_le_one x⟩⟩,
suffices : ∀ i, g i x = 0,
by simp only [this, times_cont_mdiff_map.coe_fn_mk, finsum_zero, pi.zero_apply],
refine λ i, f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity_zero_of_zero _,
exact nmem_support.1 (subset_compl_comm.1 (hf.support_subset i) hx)
end
variable {I}
namespace smooth_partition_of_unity
/-- A `smooth_partition_of_unity` that consists of a single function, uniformly equal to one,
defined as an example for `inhabited` instance. -/
def single (i : ι) (s : set M) : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s :=
(bump_covering.single i s).to_smooth_partition_of_unity $ λ j,
begin
rcases eq_or_ne j i with rfl|h,
{ simp only [smooth_one, continuous_map.coe_one, bump_covering.coe_single, pi.single_eq_same] },
{ simp only [smooth_zero, bump_covering.coe_single, pi.single_eq_of_ne h,
continuous_map.coe_zero] }
end
instance [inhabited ι] (s : set M) : inhabited (smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s) :=
⟨single (default ι) s⟩
variables [t2_space M] [sigma_compact_space M]
/-- If `X` is a paracompact normal topological space and `U` is an open covering of a closed set
`s`, then there exists a `bump_covering ι X s` that is subordinate to `U`. -/
lemma exists_is_subordinate {s : set M} (hs : is_closed s) (U : ι → set M) (ho : ∀ i, is_open (U i))
(hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : smooth_partition_of_unity ι I M s, f.is_subordinate U :=
begin
haveI : locally_compact_space H := I.locally_compact,
haveI : locally_compact_space M := charted_space.locally_compact H,
haveI : normal_space M := normal_of_paracompact_t2,
rcases bump_covering.exists_is_subordinate_of_prop (smooth I 𝓘(ℝ)) _ hs U ho hU
with ⟨f, hf, hfU⟩,
{ exact ⟨f.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf, hfU.to_smooth_partition_of_unity hf⟩ },
{ intros s t hs ht hd,
rcases exists_smooth_zero_one_of_closed I hs ht hd with ⟨f, hf⟩,
exact ⟨f, f.smooth, hf⟩ }
end
end smooth_partition_of_unity
|
9041d6a4f420ef75aeff5706de105aa2fcfcbdca | 3dd1b66af77106badae6edb1c4dea91a146ead30 | /tests/lean/run/n4.lean | 50093aae5fa5807a515d77b7ee3bcab3c321d15f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | silky/lean | 79c20c15c93feef47bb659a2cc139b26f3614642 | df8b88dca2f8da1a422cb618cd476ef5be730546 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,737,587,697 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 22,362,176 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 422 | lean | definition Prop [inline] : Type.{1} := Type.{0}
section
variable N : Type.{1}
variables a b c : N
variable and : Prop → Prop → Prop
infixr `∧`:35 := and
variable le : N → N → Prop
variable lt : N → N → Prop
precedence `≤`:50
precedence `<`:50
infixl ≤ := le
infixl < := lt
check a ≤ b
definition T : Prop := a ≤ b
check T
end
check T
(*
print(get_env():find("T"):value())
*) |
811e33b8316b0241598965ad61fb7b7f5d769a1d | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/data/equiv/mul_add_aut.lean | c0fca75c7b47780dfc51d33ebeabebfd791d4079 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,655 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Callum Sutton, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.equiv.mul_add
import group_theory.perm.basic
/-!
# Multiplicative and additive group automorphisms
This file defines the automorphism group structure on `add_aut R := add_equiv R R` and
`mul_aut R := mul_equiv R R`.
## Implementation notes
The definition of multiplication in the automorphism groups agrees with function composition,
multiplication in `equiv.perm`, and multiplication in `category_theory.End`, but not with
`category_theory.comp`.
This file is kept separate from `data/equiv/mul_add` so that `group_theory.perm` is free to use
equivalences (and other files that use them) before the group structure is defined.
## Tags
mul_aut, add_aut
-/
variables {A : Type*} {M : Type*} {G : Type*}
/-- The group of multiplicative automorphisms. -/
@[to_additive "The group of additive automorphisms."]
def mul_aut (M : Type*) [has_mul M] := M ≃* M
attribute [reducible] mul_aut add_aut
namespace mul_aut
variables (M) [has_mul M]
/--
The group operation on multiplicative automorphisms is defined by
`λ g h, mul_equiv.trans h g`.
This means that multiplication agrees with composition, `(g*h)(x) = g (h x)`.
-/
instance : group (mul_aut M) :=
by refine_struct
{ mul := λ g h, mul_equiv.trans h g,
one := mul_equiv.refl M,
inv := mul_equiv.symm,
div := _ };
intros; ext; try { refl }; apply equiv.left_inv
instance : inhabited (mul_aut M) := ⟨1⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (e₁ e₂ : mul_aut M) : ⇑(e₁ * e₂) = e₁ ∘ e₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ⇑(1 : mul_aut M) = id := rfl
lemma mul_def (e₁ e₂ : mul_aut M) : e₁ * e₂ = e₂.trans e₁ := rfl
lemma one_def : (1 : mul_aut M) = mul_equiv.refl _ := rfl
lemma inv_def (e₁ : mul_aut M) : e₁⁻¹ = e₁.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_apply (e₁ e₂ : mul_aut M) (m : M) : (e₁ * e₂) m = e₁ (e₂ m) := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_apply (m : M) : (1 : mul_aut M) m = m := rfl
@[simp] lemma apply_inv_self (e : mul_aut M) (m : M) : e (e⁻¹ m) = m :=
mul_equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _
@[simp] lemma inv_apply_self (e : mul_aut M) (m : M) : e⁻¹ (e m) = m :=
mul_equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _
/-- Monoid hom from the group of multiplicative automorphisms to the group of permutations. -/
def to_perm : mul_aut M →* equiv.perm M :=
by refine_struct { to_fun := mul_equiv.to_equiv }; intros; refl
/-- group conjugation as a group homomorphism into the automorphism group.
`conj g h = g * h * g⁻¹` -/
def conj [group G] : G →* mul_aut G :=
{ to_fun := λ g,
{ to_fun := λ h, g * h * g⁻¹,
inv_fun := λ h, g⁻¹ * h * g,
left_inv := λ _, by simp [mul_assoc],
right_inv := λ _, by simp [mul_assoc],
map_mul' := by simp [mul_assoc] },
map_mul' := λ _ _, by ext; simp [mul_assoc],
map_one' := by ext; simp [mul_assoc] }
@[simp] lemma conj_apply [group G] (g h : G) : conj g h = g * h * g⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_symm_apply [group G] (g h : G) : (conj g).symm h = g⁻¹ * h * g := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_inv_apply {G : Type*} [group G] (g h : G) : (conj g)⁻¹ h = g⁻¹ * h * g := rfl
end mul_aut
namespace add_aut
variables (A) [has_add A]
/--
The group operation on additive automorphisms is defined by
`λ g h, add_equiv.trans h g`.
This means that multiplication agrees with composition, `(g*h)(x) = g (h x)`.
-/
instance group : group (add_aut A) :=
by refine_struct
{ mul := λ g h, add_equiv.trans h g,
one := add_equiv.refl A,
inv := add_equiv.symm,
div := _ };
intros; ext; try { refl }; apply equiv.left_inv
instance : inhabited (add_aut A) := ⟨1⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (e₁ e₂ : add_aut A) : ⇑(e₁ * e₂) = e₁ ∘ e₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ⇑(1 : add_aut A) = id := rfl
lemma mul_def (e₁ e₂ : add_aut A) : e₁ * e₂ = e₂.trans e₁ := rfl
lemma one_def : (1 : add_aut A) = add_equiv.refl _ := rfl
lemma inv_def (e₁ : add_aut A) : e₁⁻¹ = e₁.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_apply (e₁ e₂ : add_aut A) (a : A) : (e₁ * e₂) a = e₁ (e₂ a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_apply (a : A) : (1 : add_aut A) a = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma apply_inv_self (e : add_aut A) (a : A) : e⁻¹ (e a) = a :=
add_equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _
@[simp] lemma inv_apply_self (e : add_aut A) (a : A) : e (e⁻¹ a) = a :=
add_equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _
/-- Monoid hom from the group of multiplicative automorphisms to the group of permutations. -/
def to_perm : add_aut A →* equiv.perm A :=
by refine_struct { to_fun := add_equiv.to_equiv }; intros; refl
end add_aut
|
5ea36564c9e28d1cf96271f913b0af16c5149f7a | 9cba98daa30c0804090f963f9024147a50292fa0 | /old/src/classical_geometry.lean | fafdb1e18ed2bb87bbf5a53ed0706f315d57499b | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/phys | dcb192f7b3033797541b980f0b4a7e75d84cea1a | ebc2df3779d3605ff7a9b47eeda25c2a551e011f | refs/heads/master | 1,637,490,575,500 | 1,629,899,064,000 | 1,629,899,064,000 | 168,012,884 | 0 | 3 | null | 1,629,644,436,000 | 1,548,699,832,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,908 | lean | import
.....math.affine.affine_coordinate_framed_space_lib
.....math.affine.affine_coordinate_transform
.....math.affine.affine_euclidean_space
.....math.affine.affine_euclidean_space_lib
import ..metrology.dimensions
import ..metrology.measurement
import ..metrology.axis_orientation
import data.real.basic
noncomputable theory
--open real_lib
open measurementSystem
open orientation
open aff_fr
open aff_lib
open aff_trans
open eucl_lib
structure euclideanGeometry3 : Type :=
mk ::
--(sp : aff_lib.affine_coord_space.standard_space ℝ 3)
(sp : eucl_lib.affine_euclidean_space.standard_space ℝ 3)
(id : ℕ) -- id serves as unique ID for a given geometric space
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3.build (id : ℕ) : euclideanGeometry3 :=
⟨affine_euclidean_space.mk_with_standard ℝ 3, id⟩
noncomputable def euclideanGeometry3.algebra : euclideanGeometry3 →
affine_euclidean_space.standard_space ℝ 3
| (euclideanGeometry3.mk sp n) := sp
structure euclideanGeometry3Scalar :=
mk ::
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(val : ℝ)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Scalar.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(val : vector ℝ 1) :=
euclideanGeometry3Scalar.mk sp (val.nth 1)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Scalar.algebra
(s : euclideanGeometry3Scalar)
:=
s.val
structure euclideanGeometry3Vector :=
mk ::
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(coords : vector ℝ 3)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Vector.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(coords : vector ℝ 3) :=
euclideanGeometry3Vector.mk
sp
--⟨[coord], by refl⟩
coords
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Vector.algebra
(v : euclideanGeometry3Vector)
:=
(aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_coord_vec
(euclideanGeometry3.algebra v.sp).1
v.coords)
structure euclideanGeometry3Point :=
mk ::
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(coords : vector ℝ 3)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Point.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(coords : vector ℝ 3) :=
euclideanGeometry3Point.mk
sp
--⟨[coord], by refl⟩
coords
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Point.algebra
(v : euclideanGeometry3Point)
:=
(aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_coord_point
(euclideanGeometry3.algebra v.sp).1
v.coords)
abbreviation euclideanGeometry3Basis :=
(fin 3) → euclideanGeometry3Vector
inductive euclideanGeometry3Frame : Type
| std
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
: euclideanGeometry3Frame
| derived
(sp : euclideanGeometry3) --ALERT : WEAK TYPING
(fr : euclideanGeometry3Frame) --ALERT : WEAK TYPING
(origin : euclideanGeometry3Point)
(basis : euclideanGeometry3Basis)
(m : MeasurementSystem)
(or : AxisOrientation 3)
: euclideanGeometry3Frame
| interpret
(fr : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(m : MeasurementSystem)
(or : AxisOrientation 3)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Frame.space : euclideanGeometry3Frame → euclideanGeometry3
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.std sp) := sp
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.derived s f o b m or) := s
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.interpret f m o) := euclideanGeometry3Frame.space f
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Basis.build : euclideanGeometry3Vector → euclideanGeometry3Vector → euclideanGeometry3Vector → euclideanGeometry3Basis
| v1 v2 v3 := λi, if i = 1 then v1 else (if i = 2 then v2 else v3)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Frame.build_derived
: euclideanGeometry3Frame → euclideanGeometry3Point → euclideanGeometry3Basis → MeasurementSystem → AxisOrientation 3 → euclideanGeometry3Frame
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.std sp) p v m or := euclideanGeometry3Frame.derived sp (euclideanGeometry3Frame.std sp) p v m or
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.derived s f o b m or) p v ms or_ := euclideanGeometry3Frame.derived s (euclideanGeometry3Frame.derived s f o b m or) p v ms or
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.interpret f m o) p v ms or := euclideanGeometry3Frame.derived (euclideanGeometry3Frame.space f) (euclideanGeometry3Frame.interpret f m o) p v ms or
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Frame.build_derived_from_coords
: euclideanGeometry3Frame → vector ℝ 3 → vector ℝ 3 → vector ℝ 3 → vector ℝ 3 →
MeasurementSystem → AxisOrientation 3 → euclideanGeometry3Frame
| f or v1 v2 v3 m ax :=
let s := euclideanGeometry3Frame.space f in
(euclideanGeometry3Frame.build_derived f (euclideanGeometry3Point.build s or)
(euclideanGeometry3Basis.build (euclideanGeometry3Vector.build s v1)
(euclideanGeometry3Vector.build s v1)
(euclideanGeometry3Vector.build s v1)) m ax)
attribute [reducible]
noncomputable def euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra :
euclideanGeometry3Frame → aff_fr.affine_coord_frame ℝ 3
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.std sp) :=
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.frame
(euclideanGeometry3.algebra sp).1
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.derived s f o b m or) :=
let base_fr := (euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra f) in
let base_sp :=
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_from_frame base_fr in
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_frame
base_sp
(aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_coord_point base_sp o.coords)
(aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_basis base_sp
⟨[aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_coord_vec base_sp ((b 1)).coords,
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_coord_vec base_sp ((b 2)).coords,
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_coord_vec base_sp ((b 3)).coords], by refl⟩)
base_fr
| (euclideanGeometry3Frame.interpret f m o) := euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra f
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3.stdFrame (sp : euclideanGeometry3)
:= euclideanGeometry3Frame.std sp
structure euclideanGeometry3CoordinateVector
extends euclideanGeometry3Vector :=
mk ::
(frame : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3CoordinateVector.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(fr : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(coords : vector ℝ 3) :
euclideanGeometry3CoordinateVector :=
{
frame := fr,
..(euclideanGeometry3Vector.build sp coords)
}
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3CoordinateVector.fromalgebra
{f : affine_coord_frame ℝ 3}
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(fr : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(vec : aff_coord_vec ℝ 3 f)
--(vec : aff_coord_vec ℝ 1 (euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra fr))
: euclideanGeometry3CoordinateVector
:=
euclideanGeometry3CoordinateVector.build sp fr (affine_coord_vec.get_coords vec)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3CoordinateVector.algebra
(v : euclideanGeometry3CoordinateVector)
:=
let base_fr := (euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra v.frame) in
let base_sp :=
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_from_frame base_fr in
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_coord_vec
base_sp
v.coords
structure euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint
extends euclideanGeometry3Point :=
mk ::
(frame : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(fr : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(coords : vector ℝ 3) :
euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint :=
{
frame := fr,
..(euclideanGeometry3Point.build sp coords)
}
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint.fromalgebra
{f : affine_coord_frame ℝ 3}
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(fr : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(pt : aff_coord_pt ℝ 3 f)
: euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint
:=
euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint.build sp fr (affine_coord_pt.get_coords pt)
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint.algebra
(v : euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint)
:=
let base_fr := (euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra v.frame) in
let base_sp :=
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_from_frame base_fr in
aff_lib.affine_coord_space.mk_coord_point
base_sp
v.coords
--attribute [reducible]
structure euclideanGeometry3Transform :=
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(from_ : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(to_ : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
def euclideanGeometry3Transform.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(from_ : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(to_ : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
:=
euclideanGeometry3Transform.mk sp from_ to_
def euclideanGeometry3Transform.fromalgebra
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(from_ : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(to_ : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(tr : affine_coord_frame_transform ℝ 3 (euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra from_) (euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra to_))
:=
euclideanGeometry3Transform.mk sp from_ to_
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Transform.algebra
(tr : euclideanGeometry3Transform)
:=
affine_coord_space.build_transform ℝ 3 ((euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra tr.from_)) ((euclideanGeometry3Frame.algebra tr.to_))
(⟨⟨⟩⟩ : affine_coord_space ℝ 3
_)
(⟨⟨⟩⟩ : affine_coord_space ℝ 3
_)
--attribute [reducible]
structure euclideanGeometry3Angle :=
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(val : vector ℝ 1)
def euclideanGeometry3Angle.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(val : vector ℝ 1)
:=
euclideanGeometry3Angle.mk sp val
def euclideanGeometry3Angle.fromalgebra
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(a: euclidean.affine_euclidean_space.angle)
:=
euclideanGeometry3Angle.mk sp ⟨[a.val],rfl⟩
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Angle.algebra
(a : euclideanGeometry3Angle)
: euclidean.affine_euclidean_space.angle
:=
⟨a.val.nth 0⟩
--attribute [reducible]
structure euclideanGeometry3Orientation :=
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(o : eucl_lib.affine_euclidean_orientation 3)
-- (val : vector ℝ 1)
def euclideanGeometry3Orientation.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
--(o : eucl_lib.affine_euclidean_orientation 3)
:=
euclideanGeometry3Orientation.mk sp NWU.or
def euclideanGeometry3Orientation.fromalgebra
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(or: eucl_lib.affine_euclidean_orientation 3)
:=
euclideanGeometry3Orientation.mk sp or
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Orientation.algebra
(a : euclideanGeometry3Orientation)
: eucl_lib.affine_euclidean_orientation 3
:=
a.o
structure euclideanGeometry3Rotation :=
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(r : eucl_lib.affine_euclidean_rotation 3)
-- (val : vector ℝ 1)
def euclideanGeometry3Rotation.build
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
-- (val : vector ℝ 1)
:=
let or := NWU.or in
euclideanGeometry3Rotation.mk sp ⟨or.1,or.2,or.3⟩
def euclideanGeometry3Rotation.fromalgebra
(sp : euclideanGeometry3)
(r : eucl_lib.affine_euclidean_rotation 3)
:=
euclideanGeometry3Rotation.mk sp r
attribute [reducible]
def euclideanGeometry3Rotation.algebra
(a : euclideanGeometry3Rotation)
: eucl_lib.affine_euclidean_rotation 3
:=
a.r
/-
( (euclideanGeometry3Transform.algebra (
let sp:= (euclideanGeometry3Eval (lang.euclideanGeometry3.spaceExpr.var ⟨⟨8⟩⟩) env382) in
let domain_:= (euclideanGeometry3FrameEval (lang.euclideanGeometry3.frameExpr.var ⟨⟨20⟩⟩) env382) in
let codomain_:= (euclideanGeometry3FrameEval (lang.euclideanGeometry3.frameExpr.var ⟨⟨16⟩⟩) env382) in
(euclideanGeometry3Transform.build sp domain_ codomain_ )
))
) ( (euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint.algebra (
(euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePointEval (lang.euclideanGeometry3.CoordinatePointExpr.var ⟨⟨4⟩⟩) env382)
))
)
-/
variables
(sp1 : euclideanGeometry3)
(fr1 : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(fr2 : euclideanGeometry3Frame)
(pt : euclideanGeometry3Point)
(tr : euclideanGeometry3Transform)
#check
(euclideanGeometry3Transform.algebra tr)
#check
( (euclideanGeometry3Transform.algebra (
let sp:= (euclideanGeometry3Eval (lang.euclideanGeometry3.spaceExpr.var ⟨⟨8⟩⟩) env382) in
let domain_:= (euclideanGeometry3FrameEval (lang.euclideanGeometry3.frameExpr.var ⟨⟨20⟩⟩) env382) in
let codomain_:= (euclideanGeometry3FrameEval (lang.euclideanGeometry3.frameExpr.var ⟨⟨16⟩⟩) env382) in
(euclideanGeometry3Transform.build sp domain_ codomain_ )
))
) ( (euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePoint.algebra (
(euclideanGeometry3CoordinatePointEval (lang.euclideanGeometry3.CoordinatePointExpr.var ⟨⟨4⟩⟩) env382)
))
)
variables (x : ) |
7bdf751c44055299d45ddcdd45c2688406481f54 | 34c1747a946aa0941114ffca77a3b7c1e4cfb686 | /src/sheaves/sheaf_of_rings_on_standard_basis.lean | 2a0d718a766114f147175d7decffd599053e7e7d | [] | no_license | martrik/lean-scheme | 2b9edd63550c4579a451f793ab289af9fc79a16d | 033dc47192ba4c61e4e771701f5e29f8007e6332 | refs/heads/master | 1,588,866,287,405 | 1,554,922,682,000 | 1,554,922,682,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,817 | lean | /-
Extension of a sheaf of rings on the basis to a sheaf of rings on the whole space.
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/009M
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/009N
TODO : Clean this up and split it in smaller files.
-/
import topology.opens
import sheaves.stalk_of_rings
import sheaves.stalk_of_rings_on_standard_basis
import sheaves.presheaf_of_rings_on_basis
import sheaves.presheaf_of_rings_extension
import sheaves.sheaf_on_standard_basis
import sheaves.sheaf_of_rings
open topological_space classical
noncomputable theory
universe u
section presheaf_of_rings_extension
variables {α : Type u} [T : topological_space α]
variables {B : set (opens α)} {HB : opens.is_basis B}
variables (Bstd : opens.univ ∈ B ∧ ∀ {U V}, U ∈ B → V ∈ B → U ∩ V ∈ B)
include Bstd
theorem extension_is_sheaf_of_rings
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
: is_sheaf_of_rings (F ᵣₑₓₜ Bstd) :=
begin
show is_sheaf (F ᵣₑₓₜ Bstd).to_presheaf,
constructor,
{ intros U OC s t Hres,
apply subtype.eq,
apply funext,
intros x,
apply funext,
intros HxU,
rw OC.Hcov.symm at HxU,
rcases HxU with ⟨Uj1, ⟨⟨⟨Uj2, OUj⟩, ⟨⟨j, HUj⟩, Heq⟩⟩, HxUj⟩⟩,
rcases Heq, rcases Heq,
have Hstj := congr_fun (subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 (Hres j)),
have HxUj1 : x ∈ OC.Uis j := HUj.symm ▸ HxUj,
have Hstjx := congr_fun (Hstj x) HxUj1,
exact Hstjx, },
{ intros U OC s Hsec,
existsi (global_section (F.to_presheaf_on_basis) U OC s Hsec),
intros i,
apply subtype.eq,
apply funext,
intros x,
apply funext,
intros HxUi,
have HxU : x ∈ U := OC.Hcov ▸ (opens_supr_subset OC.Uis i) HxUi,
let HyUi := λ t, ∃ (H : t ∈ set.range OC.Uis), x ∈ t,
dunfold presheaf_of_rings_on_basis_to_presheaf_of_rings; dsimp,
dunfold global_section; dsimp,
-- Same process of dealing with subtype.rec.
let HyUi := λ t, ∃ (H : t ∈ subtype.val '' set.range OC.Uis), x ∈ t,
rcases (classical.indefinite_description HyUi _) with ⟨S, HS⟩; dsimp,
let HyS := λ H : S ∈ subtype.val '' set.range OC.Uis, x ∈ S,
rcases (classical.indefinite_description HyS HS) with ⟨HSUiR, HySUiR⟩; dsimp,
let HOUksub := λ t : subtype is_open, t ∈ set.range (OC.Uis) ∧ t.val = S,
rcases (classical.indefinite_description HOUksub _) with ⟨OUl, ⟨HOUl, HOUleq⟩⟩; dsimp,
let HSUi := λ i, OC.Uis i = OUl,
cases (classical.indefinite_description HSUi _) with l HSUil; dsimp,
-- Now we just need to apply Hsec in the right way.
dunfold presheaf_of_rings_on_basis_to_presheaf_of_rings at Hsec,
dunfold res_to_inter_left at Hsec,
dunfold res_to_inter_right at Hsec,
dsimp at Hsec,
replace Hsec := Hsec i l,
rw subtype.ext at Hsec,
dsimp at Hsec,
replace Hsec := congr_fun Hsec x,
dsimp at Hsec,
replace Hsec := congr_fun Hsec,
have HxOUk : x ∈ OUl.val := HOUleq.symm ▸ HySUiR,
have HxUl : x ∈ OC.Uis l := HSUil.symm ▸ HxOUk,
exact (Hsec ⟨HxUi, HxUl⟩).symm, },
end
section extension_coincides
-- The extension is done in a way that F(U) ≅ Fext(U).
-- The map ψ : F(U) → Π x ∈ U, Fx
def to_stalk_product (F : presheaf_on_basis α HB) {U : opens α} (BU : U ∈ B)
: F.F BU → Π (x ∈ U), stalk_on_basis F x :=
λ s x Hx, ⟦{U := U, BU := BU, Hx := Hx, s := s}⟧
lemma to_stalk_product.injective
(F : presheaf_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F)
{U : opens α} (BU : U ∈ B)
: function.injective (to_stalk_product Bstd F BU) :=
begin
intros s₁ s₂ Hs,
have Hsx := λ (HxU : U), congr_fun (congr_fun Hs HxU.1) HxU.2,
let OC : covering_standard_basis B U :=
{ γ := U,
Uis := λ HxU, some (quotient.eq.1 (Hsx HxU)),
BUis := λ HxU, some (some_spec (quotient.eq.1 (Hsx HxU))),
Hcov :=
begin
ext z,
split,
{ rintros ⟨Ui, ⟨⟨OUi, ⟨⟨i, HUi⟩, HUival⟩⟩, HzUi⟩⟩,
rw [←HUival, ←HUi] at HzUi,
exact some (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (quotient.eq.1 (Hsx i))))) HzUi, },
{ intros Hz,
use [(some (quotient.eq.1 (Hsx ⟨z, Hz⟩))).val],
have Hin : (some (quotient.eq.1 (Hsx ⟨z, Hz⟩))).val
∈ subtype.val '' set.range (λ (HxU : U), some ((quotient.eq.1 (Hsx HxU)))),
use [classical.some ((quotient.eq.1 (Hsx ⟨z, Hz⟩)))],
split,
{ use ⟨z, Hz⟩, },
{ refl, },
use Hin,
exact some (some_spec (some_spec (quotient.eq.1 (Hsx ⟨z, Hz⟩)))), },
end, },
apply (HF BU OC).1,
intros i,
replace Hs := congr_fun (congr_fun Hs i.1) i.2,
exact some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (quotient.eq.1 (Hsx i)))))),
end
-- The map φ : F(U) → im(ψ).
def to_presheaf_of_rings_extension (F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB) {U : opens α} (BU : U ∈ B)
: F.F BU → (F ᵣₑₓₜ Bstd).F U :=
λ s,
⟨to_stalk_product Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis BU s,
λ x Hx, ⟨U, BU, Hx, s, λ y Hy, funext $ λ Hy',
quotient.sound $ ⟨U, BU, Hy', set.subset.refl U, set.subset.refl U, rfl⟩⟩⟩
lemma to_presheaf_of_rings_extension.injective
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
{U : opens α} (BU : U ∈ B)
: function.injective (to_presheaf_of_rings_extension Bstd F BU) :=
begin
intros s₁ s₂ Hs,
erw subtype.mk_eq_mk at Hs,
have Hinj := to_stalk_product.injective Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis (λ V BV OC, HF BV OC) BU,
exact Hinj Hs,
end
lemma to_presheaf_of_rings_extension.surjective
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
{U : opens α} (BU : U ∈ B)
: function.surjective (to_presheaf_of_rings_extension Bstd F BU) :=
begin
intros s,
let V := λ (HxU : U), some (s.2 HxU.1 HxU.2),
let BV := λ (HxU : U), some (some_spec (s.2 HxU.1 HxU.2)),
let HxV := λ (HxU : U), some (some_spec (some_spec (s.2 HxU.1 HxU.2))),
let σ := λ (HxU : U), some (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (s.2 HxU.1 HxU.2)))),
let Hσ := λ (HxU : U), some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (s.2 HxU.1 HxU.2)))),
let OC : covering_standard_basis B U :=
{ γ := U,
Uis := λ HxU, (V HxU) ∩ U,
BUis := λ HxU, Bstd.2 (BV HxU) BU,
Hcov :=
begin
ext z,
split,
{ rintros ⟨Ui, ⟨⟨OUi, ⟨⟨i, HUi⟩, HUival⟩⟩, HzUi⟩⟩,
rw [←HUival, ←HUi] at HzUi,
exact HzUi.2, },
{ intros Hz,
use [(some (s.2 z Hz) ∩ U).val],
have Hin : (some (s.2 z Hz) ∩ U).val
∈ subtype.val '' set.range (λ (HxU : U), ((some (s.2 HxU.1 HxU.2) ∩ U : opens α))),
use [(some (s.2 z Hz) ∩ U : opens α)],
split,
{ use ⟨z, Hz⟩, },
{ refl, },
use Hin,
exact ⟨some (some_spec (some_spec (s.2 z Hz))), Hz⟩, },
end, },
-- Now let's try to apply sheaf condition.
let res := λ (HxU : OC.γ), F.res (BV HxU) (Bstd.2 (BV HxU) BU) (set.inter_subset_left _ _),
let sx := λ (HxU : OC.γ), res HxU (σ HxU),
have Hglue := (HF BU OC).2 sx,
have Hsx : ∀ j k,
sheaf_on_standard_basis.res_to_inter_left Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis (OC.BUis j) (OC.BUis k) (sx j) =
sheaf_on_standard_basis.res_to_inter_right Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis (OC.BUis j) (OC.BUis k) (sx k),
intros j k,
dsimp only [sheaf_on_standard_basis.res_to_inter_left],
dsimp only [sheaf_on_standard_basis.res_to_inter_right],
dsimp only [sx, res],
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp', },
show (F.to_presheaf_on_basis).res (BV j) (Bstd.2 (OC.BUis j) (OC.BUis k)) _ (σ j)
= (F.to_presheaf_on_basis).res (BV k) (Bstd.2 (OC.BUis j) (OC.BUis k)) _ (σ k),
-- We can cover the U ∩ Vj ∩ Vk and use locality.
-- But first let's check that all the stalks coincide in the intersectons.
have Hstalks : ∀ {y} (Hy : y ∈ (OC.Uis j) ∩ (OC.Uis k)),
(⟦{U := V j, BU := BV j, Hx := Hy.1.1, s := σ j}⟧ : stalk_on_basis F.to_presheaf_on_basis y)
= ⟦{U := V k, BU := BV k, Hx := Hy.2.1, s := σ k}⟧,
intros y Hy,
have Hj := congr_fun (Hσ j y ⟨Hy.1.2, Hy.1.1⟩) Hy.1.2; dsimp at Hj,
have Hk := congr_fun (Hσ k y ⟨Hy.2.2, Hy.2.1⟩) Hy.2.2; dsimp at Hk,
erw [←Hj, ←Hk],
-- Therefore there exists Wjk where σj|Wjk = σk|Wjk. We will use these as a cover.
let Ujk : opens α := (OC.Uis j) ∩ (OC.Uis k),
let BUjk := Bstd.2 (OC.BUis j) (OC.BUis k),
--
let Hjk := λ (HxUjk : Ujk), quotient.eq.1 (Hstalks HxUjk.2),
let Wjk := λ (HxUjk : Ujk), some (Hjk HxUjk) ∩ U,
let BWjk := λ (HxUjk : Ujk), Bstd.2 (some (some_spec (Hjk HxUjk))) BU,
let HxWjk := λ (HxUjk : Ujk), some (some_spec (some_spec (Hjk HxUjk))),
let HWjkUj := λ (HxUjk : Ujk), some (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (Hjk HxUjk)))),
let HWjkUk := λ (HxUjk : Ujk), some (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (Hjk HxUjk))))),
let HWjk := λ (HxUjk : Ujk), some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (some_spec (Hjk HxUjk))))),
let OCjk : covering_standard_basis B ((OC.Uis j) ∩ (OC.Uis k)) :=
{ γ := Ujk,
Uis := Wjk,
BUis := BWjk,
Hcov :=
begin
ext z,
split,
{ rintros ⟨W, ⟨⟨OW, ⟨⟨i, HWi⟩, HWival⟩⟩, HzW⟩⟩,
rw [←HWival, ←HWi] at HzW,
have HzUj := (HWjkUj i) HzW.1,
have HzUk := (HWjkUk i) HzW.1,
exact ⟨⟨HzUj, HzW.2⟩, ⟨HzUk, HzW.2⟩⟩, },
{ intros Hz,
use [(some (Hjk ⟨z, Hz⟩) ∩ U).val],
have Hin : (some (Hjk ⟨z, Hz⟩) ∩ U).val
∈ subtype.val '' set.range (λ (HxUjk : Ujk), ((some (Hjk HxUjk) ∩ U : opens α))),
use [(some (Hjk ⟨z, Hz⟩) ∩ U : opens α)],
split,
{ use ⟨z, Hz⟩, },
{ refl, },
use Hin,
have HzWjk := HxWjk ⟨z, Hz⟩,
have HzU := Hz.1.2,
exact ⟨HzWjk, HzU⟩, }
end, },
apply (HF BUjk OCjk).1,
intros i,
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
have Hres :
F.res (some (some_spec (Hjk i))) (BWjk i) (set.inter_subset_left _ _)
(F.res (BV j) (some (some_spec (Hjk i))) (HWjkUj i) (σ j))
= F.res (some (some_spec (Hjk i))) (BWjk i) (set.inter_subset_left _ _)
(F.res (BV k) (some (some_spec (Hjk i))) (HWjkUk i) (σ k)),
rw (HWjk i),
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres,
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres,
use Hres,
-- Ready...
rcases (Hglue Hsx) with ⟨S, HS⟩,
existsi S,
apply subtype.eq,
dsimp [to_presheaf_of_rings_extension],
apply funext,
intros x,
dsimp [to_stalk_product],
apply funext,
intros Hx,
replace HS := HS ⟨x, Hx⟩,
dsimp [sx, res] at HS,
rw Hσ ⟨x, Hx⟩,
swap,
{ exact ⟨Hx, HxV ⟨x, Hx⟩⟩, },
dsimp,
apply quotient.sound,
use [(V ⟨x, Hx⟩) ∩ U],
use [Bstd.2 (BV ⟨x, Hx⟩) BU],
use [⟨HxV ⟨x, Hx⟩, Hx⟩],
use [set.inter_subset_right _ _],
use [set.inter_subset_left _ _],
dsimp,
erw HS,
end
lemma to_presheaf_of_rings_extension.bijective
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
{U : opens α} (BU : U ∈ B)
: function.bijective (to_presheaf_of_rings_extension Bstd F BU) :=
⟨to_presheaf_of_rings_extension.injective Bstd F (λ U BU OC, HF BU OC) BU,
to_presheaf_of_rings_extension.surjective Bstd F (λ U BU OC, HF BU OC) BU ⟩
lemma to_presheaf_of_rings_extension.equiv
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
{U : opens α} (BU : U ∈ B)
: F.F BU ≃ (F ᵣₑₓₜ Bstd).F U :=
equiv.of_bijective (to_presheaf_of_rings_extension.bijective Bstd F (λ U BU OC, HF BU OC) BU)
-- We now that they are equivalent as sets.
-- Now we to assert that they're isomorphic as rings.
-- It suffices to show that it is a ring homomorphism.
lemma to_presheaf_of_rings_extension.is_ring_hom
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
{U : opens α} (BU : U ∈ B)
: is_ring_hom (to_presheaf_of_rings_extension Bstd F BU) :=
{ map_one :=
begin
apply subtype.eq,
funext x Hx,
apply quotient.sound,
use [U, BU, Hx, set.subset.refl _, set.subset_univ _],
iterate 2 { erw (F.res_is_ring_hom _ _ _).map_one, },
end,
map_mul :=
begin
intros x y,
apply subtype.eq,
funext z Hz,
apply quotient.sound,
use [U, BU, Hz],
use [set.subset.refl _, set.subset_inter (set.subset.refl _) (set.subset.refl _)],
erw ←(F.res_is_ring_hom _ _ _).map_mul,
erw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
end,
map_add :=
begin
intros x y,
apply subtype.eq,
funext z Hz,
apply quotient.sound,
use [U, BU, Hz],
use [set.subset.refl _, set.subset_inter (set.subset.refl _) (set.subset.refl _)],
erw ←(F.res_is_ring_hom _ _ _).map_add,
erw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
end, }
-- Moreover, for all x, Fₓ ≅ Fextₓ. This is crucial for
open stalk_of_rings_on_standard_basis
lemma to_stalk_extension
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
(x : α)
: stalk_of_rings_on_standard_basis Bstd F x → stalk_of_rings (F ᵣₑₓₜ Bstd) x :=
begin
intros BUs,
let Us := quotient.out BUs,
exact ⟦{U := Us.U,
HxU := Us.Hx,
s := (to_presheaf_of_rings_extension Bstd F Us.BU) Us.s}⟧,
end
lemma to_stalk_extension.injective
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
(x : α)
: function.injective (to_stalk_extension Bstd F @HF x) :=
begin
intros Us₁' Us₂',
apply quotient.induction_on₂ Us₁' Us₂',
rintros Us₁ Us₂ HUs,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Us₁) with ⟨W₁, BW₁, HxW₁, HW₁Us₁, HW₁U₁, Hres₁⟩,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Us₂) with ⟨W₂, BW₂, HxW₂, HW₂Us₂, HW₂U₂, Hres₂⟩,
dunfold to_stalk_extension at HUs,
rw quotient.eq at HUs,
rcases HUs with ⟨W, HxW, HWU₁, HWU₂, Hres⟩,
dsimp at HWU₁,
dsimp at HWU₂,
dunfold to_presheaf_of_rings_extension at Hres,
dunfold to_stalk_product at Hres,
erw subtype.mk.inj_eq at Hres,
replace Hres := congr_fun (congr_fun Hres x) HxW,
dsimp at Hres,
rw quotient.eq at Hres,
rcases Hres with ⟨W₃, BW₃, HxW₃, HW₃U₁, HW₃U₂, Hres₃⟩,
dsimp at HW₃U₁,
dsimp at HW₃U₂,
dsimp at Hres₃,
apply quotient.sound,
have BW₁₂₃ : W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃ ∈ B := Bstd.2 (Bstd.2 BW₁ BW₂) BW₃,
have HW₁₂₃U₁ : W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃ ⊆ Us₁.U := λ x Hx, HW₁U₁ Hx.1.1,
have HW₁₂₃U₂ : W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃ ⊆ Us₂.U := λ x Hx, HW₂U₂ Hx.1.2,
use [W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃, BW₁₂₃, ⟨⟨HxW₁, HxW₂⟩, HxW₃⟩, HW₁₂₃U₁, HW₁₂₃U₂],
have HW₁W₁₂₃ : W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃ ⊆ W₁ := λ x Hx, Hx.1.1,
have HW₂W₁₂₃ : W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃ ⊆ W₂ := λ x Hx, Hx.1.2,
have HW₃W₁₂₃ : W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃ ⊆ W₃ := λ x Hx, Hx.2,
replace Hres₁ := congr_arg (F.res BW₁ BW₁₂₃ HW₁W₁₂₃) Hres₁,
replace Hres₂ := congr_arg (F.res BW₂ BW₁₂₃ HW₂W₁₂₃) Hres₂,
replace Hres₃ := congr_arg (F.res BW₃ BW₁₂₃ HW₃W₁₂₃) Hres₃,
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₁, },
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₂, },
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₃, },
erw [←Hres₁, ←Hres₂],
exact Hres₃,
end
lemma to_stalk_extension.surjective
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
(x : α)
: function.surjective (to_stalk_extension Bstd F @HF x) :=
begin
intros Us',
apply quotient.induction_on Us',
rintros ⟨U, HxU, s⟩,
rcases (s.2 x HxU) with ⟨V, BV, HxV, t, Ht⟩,
let Vt : stalk_on_basis.elem (F.to_presheaf_on_basis) x
:= {U := V, BU := BV, Hx := HxV, s := t},
use ⟦Vt⟧,
dunfold to_stalk_extension,
apply quotient.sound,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Vt) with ⟨W, BW, HxW, HWVtV, HWV, Hres⟩,
have HUVWV : U ∩ V ∩ W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Vt⟧).U := λ x Hx, HWVtV Hx.2,
have HUVWU : U ∩ V ∩ W ⊆ U := λ x Hx, Hx.1.1,
use [U ∩ V ∩ W, ⟨⟨HxU, HxV⟩, HxW⟩, HUVWV, HUVWU],
apply subtype.eq,
dsimp only [presheaf_of_rings_on_basis_to_presheaf_of_rings],
dsimp only [to_presheaf_of_rings_extension],
dsimp only [to_stalk_product],
funext y Hy,
rw (Ht y Hy.1),
apply quotient.sound,
have BVW : V ∩ W ∈ B := Bstd.2 BV BW,
have HVWVtV : V ∩ W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Vt⟧).U := λ x Hx, HWVtV Hx.2,
have HVWV : V ∩ W ⊆ V := λ x Hx, Hx.1,
use [V ∩ W, BVW, ⟨Hy.1.2,Hy.2⟩, HVWVtV, HVWV],
have HVWW : V ∩ W ⊆ W := λ x Hx, Hx.2,
replace Hres := congr_arg (F.res BW BVW HVWW) Hres,
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres, },
exact Hres,
end
lemma to_stalk_extension.bijective
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
(x : α)
: function.bijective (to_stalk_extension Bstd F @HF x) :=
⟨to_stalk_extension.injective Bstd F @HF x,
to_stalk_extension.surjective Bstd F @HF x⟩
lemma to_stalk_extension.is_ring_hom
(F : presheaf_of_rings_on_basis α HB)
(HF : sheaf_on_standard_basis.is_sheaf_on_standard_basis Bstd F.to_presheaf_on_basis)
(x : α)
: is_ring_hom (to_stalk_extension Bstd F @HF x) :=
{ map_one :=
begin
dunfold to_stalk_extension,
let one.elem : stalk_on_basis.elem F.to_presheaf_on_basis x
:= {U := opens.univ, BU := Bstd.1, Hx := trivial, s:= 1},
let one.stalk : stalk_of_rings_on_standard_basis Bstd F x := ⟦one.elem⟧,
let one := quotient.out one.stalk,
apply quotient.sound,
rcases (quotient.mk_out one.elem) with ⟨W₁, BW₁, HxW₁, HW₁Uout, HW₁U, Hres₁⟩,
have BUW₁ : one.U ∩ W₁ ∈ B := Bstd.2 one.BU BW₁,
have HUUW₁ : one.U ∩ W₁ ⊆ one.U := set.inter_subset_left _ _,
use [one.U ∩ W₁, ⟨one.Hx, HxW₁⟩, HUUW₁, set.subset_univ _],
apply subtype.eq,
dsimp only [presheaf_of_rings_on_basis_to_presheaf_of_rings],
dsimp only [to_presheaf_of_rings_extension],
dsimp only [to_stalk_product],
funext z Hz,
apply quotient.sound,
use [one.U ∩ W₁, BUW₁, Hz, set.inter_subset_left _ _, set.subset_univ _],
dsimp,
have HUW₁W₁ : one.U ∩ W₁ ⊆ W₁ := set.inter_subset_right _ _,
replace Hres₁ := congr_arg (F.res BW₁ BUW₁ HUW₁W₁) Hres₁,
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₁, },
exact Hres₁,
end,
map_mul :=
begin
intros y z,
apply quotient.induction_on₂ y z,
intros Us₁ Us₂,
simp,
let Us₃ : stalk_on_basis.elem F.to_presheaf_on_basis x :=
{ U := Us₁.U ∩ Us₂.U,
BU := Bstd.2 Us₁.BU Us₂.BU,
Hx := ⟨Us₁.Hx, Us₂.Hx⟩,
s := F.res Us₁.BU _ (set.inter_subset_left _ _) Us₁.s *
F.res Us₂.BU _ (set.inter_subset_right _ _) Us₂.s },
dunfold to_stalk_extension,
apply quotient.sound,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Us₁) with ⟨W₁, BW₁, HxW₁, HW₁U₁out, HW₁U₁, Hres₁⟩,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Us₂) with ⟨W₂, BW₂, HxW₂, HW₂U₂out, HW₂U₂, Hres₂⟩,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Us₃) with ⟨W₃, BW₃, HxW₃, HW₃U₃out, HW₃U₃, Hres₃⟩,
let W := W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃,
have HxW : x ∈ W := ⟨⟨HxW₁, HxW₂⟩, HxW₃⟩,
have HWW₁ : W ⊆ W₁ := λ x Hx, Hx.1.1,
have HWW₂ : W ⊆ W₂ := λ x Hx, Hx.1.2,
have HWW₃ : W ⊆ W₃ := λ x Hx, Hx.2,
have HWU₁out : W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Us₁⟧).U := set.subset.trans HWW₁ HW₁U₁out,
have HWU₂out : W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Us₂⟧).U := set.subset.trans HWW₂ HW₂U₂out,
have HWU₃out : W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Us₃⟧).U := set.subset.trans HWW₃ HW₃U₃out,
have HWU₁₂out : W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Us₁⟧).U ∩ (quotient.out ⟦Us₂⟧).U
:= set.subset_inter HWU₁out HWU₂out,
use [W, HxW, HWU₃out, HWU₁₂out],
apply subtype.eq,
dsimp only [presheaf_of_rings_on_basis_to_presheaf_of_rings],
dsimp only [to_presheaf_of_rings_extension],
dsimp only [to_stalk_product],
funext z HzW,
apply quotient.sound,
have BW : W ∈ B := Bstd.2 (Bstd.2 BW₁ BW₂) BW₃,
use [W, BW, HzW, HWU₃out, HWU₁₂out],
rw (presheaf_of_rings_on_basis.res_is_ring_hom _ _ _ _).map_mul,
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
replace Hres₁ := congr_arg (F.res BW₁ BW HWW₁) Hres₁,
replace Hres₂ := congr_arg (F.res BW₂ BW HWW₂) Hres₂,
replace Hres₃ := congr_arg (F.res BW₃ BW HWW₃) Hres₃,
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₁, },
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₂, },
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₃, },
erw [Hres₁, Hres₂, Hres₃],
rw (presheaf_of_rings_on_basis.res_is_ring_hom _ _ _ _).map_mul,
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
end,
map_add :=
begin
intros y z,
apply quotient.induction_on₂ y z,
intros Us₁ Us₂,
simp,
let Us₃ : stalk_on_basis.elem F.to_presheaf_on_basis x :=
{ U := Us₁.U ∩ Us₂.U,
BU := Bstd.2 Us₁.BU Us₂.BU,
Hx := ⟨Us₁.Hx, Us₂.Hx⟩,
s := F.res Us₁.BU _ (set.inter_subset_left _ _) Us₁.s +
F.res Us₂.BU _ (set.inter_subset_right _ _) Us₂.s },
dunfold to_stalk_extension,
apply quotient.sound,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Us₁) with ⟨W₁, BW₁, HxW₁, HW₁U₁out, HW₁U₁, Hres₁⟩,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Us₂) with ⟨W₂, BW₂, HxW₂, HW₂U₂out, HW₂U₂, Hres₂⟩,
rcases (quotient.mk_out Us₃) with ⟨W₃, BW₃, HxW₃, HW₃U₃out, HW₃U₃, Hres₃⟩,
let W := W₁ ∩ W₂ ∩ W₃,
have HxW : x ∈ W := ⟨⟨HxW₁, HxW₂⟩, HxW₃⟩,
have HWW₁ : W ⊆ W₁ := λ x Hx, Hx.1.1,
have HWW₂ : W ⊆ W₂ := λ x Hx, Hx.1.2,
have HWW₃ : W ⊆ W₃ := λ x Hx, Hx.2,
have HWU₁out : W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Us₁⟧).U := set.subset.trans HWW₁ HW₁U₁out,
have HWU₂out : W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Us₂⟧).U := set.subset.trans HWW₂ HW₂U₂out,
have HWU₃out : W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Us₃⟧).U := set.subset.trans HWW₃ HW₃U₃out,
have HWU₁₂out : W ⊆ (quotient.out ⟦Us₁⟧).U ∩ (quotient.out ⟦Us₂⟧).U
:= set.subset_inter HWU₁out HWU₂out,
use [W, HxW, HWU₃out, HWU₁₂out],
apply subtype.eq,
dsimp only [presheaf_of_rings_on_basis_to_presheaf_of_rings],
dsimp only [to_presheaf_of_rings_extension],
dsimp only [to_stalk_product],
funext z HzW,
apply quotient.sound,
have BW : W ∈ B := Bstd.2 (Bstd.2 BW₁ BW₂) BW₃,
use [W, BW, HzW, HWU₃out, HWU₁₂out],
rw (presheaf_of_rings_on_basis.res_is_ring_hom _ _ _ _).map_add,
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
replace Hres₁ := congr_arg (F.res BW₁ BW HWW₁) Hres₁,
replace Hres₂ := congr_arg (F.res BW₂ BW HWW₂) Hres₂,
replace Hres₃ := congr_arg (F.res BW₃ BW HWW₃) Hres₃,
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₁, },
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₂, },
iterate 2 { rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp' at Hres₃, },
erw [Hres₁, Hres₂, Hres₃],
rw (presheaf_of_rings_on_basis.res_is_ring_hom _ _ _ _).map_add,
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
rw ←presheaf_on_basis.Hcomp',
end, }
end extension_coincides
end presheaf_of_rings_extension
|
696746a972cf1c4a2bedf2d44ca648ba33d79e98 | bf532e3e865883a676110e756f800e0ddeb465be | /data/fin.lean | e8374219e8cad73d4ebb416a3e4b6d8ad762487d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | aqjune/mathlib | da42a97d9e6670d2efaa7d2aa53ed3585dafc289 | f7977ff5a6bcf7e5c54eec908364ceb40dafc795 | refs/heads/master | 1,631,213,225,595 | 1,521,089,840,000 | 1,521,089,840,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 704 | lean | import data.nat.basic
open fin nat
/-- Embedding of `fin n` in `fin (n+1)` -/
def raise_fin {n : ℕ} (k : fin n) : fin (n + 1) := ⟨val k, lt_succ_of_lt (is_lt k)⟩
theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt {a b : ℕ} (h1 : a < b + 1) (h2 : ¬ a < b) : a = b :=
have h3 : a ≤ b, from le_of_lt_succ h1,
or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_not_lt h2) (λ h, h) (λ h, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge h3))
instance fin_to_nat (n : ℕ) : has_coe (fin n) nat := ⟨fin.val⟩
instance fin_to_int (n : ℕ) : has_coe (fin n) int := ⟨λ k, ↑(fin.val k)⟩
variables {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n}
protected theorem fin.succ.inj (p : fin.succ a = fin.succ b) : a = b :=
by cases a; cases b; exact eq_of_veq (nat.succ.inj (veq_of_eq p))
|
ce27a004704705e896f8ce977506ab33bc395ea4 | 74caf7451c921a8d5ab9c6e2b828c9d0a35aae95 | /library/init/data/nat/basic.lean | 5fa5020d861a9f5727f49ce31d9e9813bed49f35 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sakas--/lean | f37b6fad4fd4206f2891b89f0f8135f57921fc3f | 570d9052820be1d6442a5cc58ece37397f8a9e4c | refs/heads/master | 1,586,127,145,194 | 1,480,960,018,000 | 1,480,960,635,000 | 40,137,176 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,438,621,351,000 | 1,438,621,351,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,145 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.logic init.data.num.basic
notation `ℕ` := nat
namespace nat
inductive less_than (a : ℕ) : ℕ → Prop
| refl : less_than a
| step : Π {b}, less_than b → less_than (succ b)
instance : has_le ℕ :=
⟨nat.less_than⟩
@[reducible] protected def le (n m : ℕ) := n ≤ m
@[reducible] protected def lt (n m : ℕ) := succ n ≤ m
instance : has_lt ℕ :=
⟨nat.lt⟩
def pred : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (a+1) := a
protected def sub : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| a 0 := a
| a (b+1) := pred (sub a b)
protected def mul : nat → nat → nat
| a 0 := 0
| a (b+1) := (mul a b) + a
instance : has_sub ℕ :=
⟨nat.sub⟩
instance : has_mul ℕ :=
⟨nat.mul⟩
instance : decidable_eq ℕ
| zero zero := is_true rfl
| (succ x) zero := is_false (λ h, nat.no_confusion h)
| zero (succ y) := is_false (λ h, nat.no_confusion h)
| (succ x) (succ y) :=
match decidable_eq x y with
| is_true xeqy := is_true (xeqy ▸ eq.refl (succ x))
| is_false xney := is_false (λ h, nat.no_confusion h (λ xeqy, absurd xeqy xney))
end
def {u} repeat {α : Type u} (f : ℕ → α → α) : ℕ → α → α
| 0 a := a
| (succ n) a := f n (repeat n a)
instance : inhabited ℕ :=
⟨nat.zero⟩
@[simp] lemma nat_zero_eq_zero : nat.zero = 0 :=
rfl
/- properties of inequality -/
@[refl] protected def le_refl : ∀ a : ℕ, a ≤ a :=
less_than.refl
lemma le_succ (n : ℕ) : n ≤ succ n :=
less_than.step (nat.le_refl n)
lemma succ_le_succ {n m : ℕ} : n ≤ m → succ n ≤ succ m :=
λ h, less_than.rec (nat.le_refl (succ n)) (λ a b, less_than.step) h
lemma zero_le : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ n
| 0 := nat.le_refl 0
| (n+1) := less_than.step (zero_le n)
lemma zero_lt_succ (n : ℕ) : 0 < succ n :=
succ_le_succ (zero_le n)
lemma not_succ_le_zero : ∀ (n : ℕ), succ n ≤ 0 → false
.
lemma not_lt_zero (a : ℕ) : ¬ a < 0 := not_succ_le_zero a
lemma pred_le_pred {n m : ℕ} : n ≤ m → pred n ≤ pred m :=
λ h, less_than.rec_on h
(nat.le_refl (pred n))
(λ n, nat.rec (λ a b, b) (λ a b c, less_than.step) n)
lemma le_of_succ_le_succ {n m : ℕ} : succ n ≤ succ m → n ≤ m :=
pred_le_pred
instance decidable_le : ∀ a b : ℕ, decidable (a ≤ b)
| 0 b := is_true (zero_le b)
| (a+1) 0 := is_false (not_succ_le_zero a)
| (a+1) (b+1) :=
match decidable_le a b with
| is_true h := is_true (succ_le_succ h)
| is_false h := is_false (λ a, h (le_of_succ_le_succ a))
end
instance decidable_lt : ∀ a b : ℕ, decidable (a < b) :=
λ a b, nat.decidable_le (succ a) b
protected lemma eq_or_lt_of_le {a b : ℕ} (h : a ≤ b) : a = b ∨ a < b :=
less_than.cases_on h (or.inl rfl) (λ n h, or.inr (succ_le_succ h))
lemma lt_succ_of_le {a b : ℕ} : a ≤ b → a < succ b :=
succ_le_succ
@[simp] lemma succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (a b : ℕ) : succ a - succ b = a - b :=
nat.rec_on b
(show succ a - succ zero = a - zero, from (eq.refl (succ a - succ zero)))
(λ b, congr_arg pred)
lemma not_succ_le_self : ∀ n : ℕ, ¬succ n ≤ n :=
λ n, nat.rec (not_succ_le_zero 0) (λ a b c, b (le_of_succ_le_succ c)) n
protected lemma lt_irrefl (n : ℕ) : ¬n < n :=
not_succ_le_self n
protected lemma le_trans {n m k : ℕ} (h1 : n ≤ m) : m ≤ k → n ≤ k :=
less_than.rec h1 (λ p h2, less_than.step)
lemma pred_le : ∀ (n : ℕ), pred n ≤ n
| 0 := less_than.refl 0
| (succ a) := less_than.step (less_than.refl a)
lemma sub_le (a b : ℕ) : a - b ≤ a :=
nat.rec_on b (nat.le_refl (a - 0)) (λ b₁, nat.le_trans (pred_le (a - b₁)))
lemma sub_lt : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 0 < a → 0 < b → a - b < a
| 0 b h1 h2 := absurd h1 (nat.lt_irrefl 0)
| (a+1) 0 h1 h2 := absurd h2 (nat.lt_irrefl 0)
| (a+1) (b+1) h1 h2 :=
eq.symm (succ_sub_succ_eq_sub a b) ▸
show a - b < succ a, from
lt_succ_of_le (sub_le a b)
protected lemma lt_of_lt_of_le {n m k : ℕ} : n < m → m ≤ k → n < k :=
nat.le_trans
end nat
|
33917b270fd3862e891850b1f1cb8dc5350cbb0c | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/measure_theory/content.lean | 251483202331ea8a5bbd3780f6ed1b6eeb7bd347 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,918 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import measure_theory.measure_space
import measure_theory.regular
import topology.opens
import topology.compacts
/-!
# Contents
In this file we work with *contents*. A content `λ` is a function from a certain class of subsets
(such as the the compact subsets) to `ℝ≥0` that is
* additive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are disjoint sets in the domain of `λ`,
then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) = λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* subadditive: If `K₁` and `K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁ ∪ K₂) ≤ λ(K₁) + λ(K₂)`;
* monotone: If `K₁ ⊆ K₂` are in the domain of `λ`, then `λ(K₁) ≤ λ(K₂)`.
We show that:
* Given a content `λ` on compact sets, let us define a function `λ*` on open sets, by letting
`λ* U` be the supremum of `λ K` for `K` included in `U`. This is a countably subadditive map that
vanishes at `∅`. In Halmos (1950) this is called the *inner content* `λ*` of `λ`, and formalized
as `inner_content`.
* Given an inner content, we define an outer measure `μ*`, by letting `μ* E` be the infimum of
`λ* U` over the open sets `U` containing `E`. This is indeed an outer measure. It is formalized
as `outer_measure`.
* Restricting this outer measure to Borel sets gives a regular measure `μ`.
We define bundled contents as `content`.
In this file we only work on contents on compact sets, and inner contents on open sets, and both
contents and inner contents map into the extended nonnegative reals. However, in other applications
other choices can be made, and it is not a priori clear what the best interface should be.
## Main definitions
For `μ : content G`, we define
* `μ.inner_content` : the inner content associated to `μ`.
* `μ.outer_measure` : the outer measure associated to `μ`.
* `μ.measure` : the Borel measure associated to `μ`.
We prove that, on a locally compact space, the measure `μ.measure` is regular.
## References
* Paul Halmos (1950), Measure Theory, §53
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_(measure_theory)>
-/
universe variables u v w
noncomputable theory
open set topological_space
open_locale nnreal ennreal
namespace measure_theory
variables {G : Type w} [topological_space G]
/-- A content is an additive function on compact sets taking values in `ℝ≥0`. It is a device
from which one can define a measure. -/
structure content (G : Type w) [topological_space G] :=
(to_fun : compacts G → ℝ≥0)
(mono' : ∀ (K₁ K₂ : compacts G), K₁.1 ⊆ K₂.1 → to_fun K₁ ≤ to_fun K₂)
(sup_disjoint' : ∀ (K₁ K₂ : compacts G), disjoint K₁.1 K₂.1 →
to_fun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = to_fun K₁ + to_fun K₂)
(sup_le' : ∀ (K₁ K₂ : compacts G), to_fun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ to_fun K₁ + to_fun K₂)
instance : inhabited (content G) :=
⟨{ to_fun := λ K, 0,
mono' := by simp,
sup_disjoint' := by simp,
sup_le' := by simp }⟩
/-- Although the `to_fun` field of a content takes values in `ℝ≥0`, we register a coercion to
functions taking values in `ℝ≥0∞` as most constructions below rely on taking suprs and infs, which
is more convenient in a complete lattice, and aim at constructing a measure. -/
instance : has_coe_to_fun (content G) := ⟨_, λ μ s, (μ.to_fun s : ℝ≥0∞)⟩
namespace content
variable (μ : content G)
lemma apply_eq_coe_to_fun (K : compacts G) : μ K = μ.to_fun K := rfl
lemma mono (K₁ K₂ : compacts G) (h : K₁.1 ⊆ K₂.1) : μ K₁ ≤ μ K₂ :=
by simp [apply_eq_coe_to_fun, μ.mono' _ _ h]
lemma sup_disjoint (K₁ K₂ : compacts G) (h : disjoint K₁.1 K₂.1) : μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = μ K₁ + μ K₂ :=
by simp [apply_eq_coe_to_fun, μ.sup_disjoint' _ _ h]
lemma sup_le (K₁ K₂ : compacts G) : μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ μ K₁ + μ K₂ :=
by { simp only [apply_eq_coe_to_fun], norm_cast, exact μ.sup_le' _ _ }
lemma lt_top (K : compacts G) : μ K < ∞ :=
ennreal.coe_lt_top
lemma empty : μ ⊥ = 0 :=
begin
have := μ.sup_disjoint' ⊥ ⊥,
simpa [apply_eq_coe_to_fun] using this,
end
/-- Constructing the inner content of a content. From a content defined on the compact sets, we
obtain a function defined on all open sets, by taking the supremum of the content of all compact
subsets. -/
def inner_content (U : opens G) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (K : compacts G) (h : K.1 ⊆ U), μ K
lemma le_inner_content (K : compacts G) (U : opens G)
(h2 : K.1 ⊆ U) : μ K ≤ μ.inner_content U :=
le_supr_of_le K $ le_supr _ h2
lemma inner_content_le (U : opens G) (K : compacts G) (h2 : (U : set G) ⊆ K.1) :
μ.inner_content U ≤ μ K :=
bsupr_le $ λ K' hK', μ.mono _ _ (subset.trans hK' h2)
lemma inner_content_of_is_compact {K : set G} (h1K : is_compact K) (h2K : is_open K) :
μ.inner_content ⟨K, h2K⟩ = μ ⟨K, h1K⟩ :=
le_antisymm (bsupr_le $ λ K' hK', μ.mono _ ⟨K, h1K⟩ hK')
(μ.le_inner_content _ _ subset.rfl)
lemma inner_content_empty :
μ.inner_content ∅ = 0 :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (zero_le _), rw ←μ.empty,
refine bsupr_le (λ K hK, _),
have : K = ⊥, { ext1, rw [subset_empty_iff.mp hK, compacts.bot_val] }, rw this, refl'
end
/-- This is "unbundled", because that it required for the API of `induced_outer_measure`. -/
lemma inner_content_mono ⦃U V : set G⦄ (hU : is_open U) (hV : is_open V)
(h2 : U ⊆ V) : μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.inner_content ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
supr_le_supr $ λ K, supr_le_supr_const $ λ hK, subset.trans hK h2
lemma inner_content_exists_compact {U : opens G}
(hU : μ.inner_content U < ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ K : compacts G, K.1 ⊆ U ∧ μ.inner_content U ≤ μ K + ε :=
begin
have h'ε := ennreal.zero_lt_coe_iff.2 hε,
cases le_or_lt (μ.inner_content U) ε,
{ exact ⟨⊥, empty_subset _, le_trans h (le_add_of_nonneg_left (zero_le _))⟩ },
have := ennreal.sub_lt_self (ne_of_lt hU) (ne_of_gt $ lt_trans h'ε h) h'ε,
conv at this {to_rhs, rw inner_content }, simp only [lt_supr_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨U, h1U, h2U⟩, refine ⟨U, h1U, _⟩,
rw [← ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add], exact le_of_lt h2U
end
/-- The inner content of a supremum of opens is at most the sum of the individual inner
contents. -/
lemma inner_content_Sup_nat [t2_space G] (U : ℕ → opens G) :
μ.inner_content (⨆ (i : ℕ), U i) ≤ ∑' (i : ℕ), μ.inner_content (U i) :=
begin
have h3 : ∀ (t : finset ℕ) (K : ℕ → compacts G), μ (t.sup K) ≤ t.sum (λ i, μ (K i)),
{ intros t K, refine finset.induction_on t _ _,
{ simp only [μ.empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, finset.sum_empty, finset.sup_empty], },
{ intros n s hn ih, rw [finset.sup_insert, finset.sum_insert hn],
exact le_trans (μ.sup_le _ _) (add_le_add_left ih _) }},
refine bsupr_le (λ K hK, _),
rcases is_compact.elim_finite_subcover K.2 _ (λ i, (U i).prop) _ with ⟨t, ht⟩, swap,
{ convert hK, rw [opens.supr_def, subtype.coe_mk] },
rcases K.2.finite_compact_cover t (coe ∘ U) (λ i _, (U _).prop) (by simp only [ht])
with ⟨K', h1K', h2K', h3K'⟩,
let L : ℕ → compacts G := λ n, ⟨K' n, h1K' n⟩,
convert le_trans (h3 t L) _,
{ ext1, simp only [h3K', compacts.finset_sup_val, finset.sup_eq_supr, set.supr_eq_Union] },
refine le_trans (finset.sum_le_sum _) (ennreal.sum_le_tsum t),
intros i hi, refine le_trans _ (le_supr _ (L i)),
refine le_trans _ (le_supr _ (h2K' i)), refl'
end
/-- The inner content of a union of sets is at most the sum of the individual inner contents.
This is the "unbundled" version of `inner_content_Sup_nat`.
It required for the API of `induced_outer_measure`. -/
lemma inner_content_Union_nat [t2_space G] ⦃U : ℕ → set G⦄ (hU : ∀ (i : ℕ), is_open (U i)) :
μ.inner_content ⟨⋃ (i : ℕ), U i, is_open_Union hU⟩ ≤ ∑' (i : ℕ), μ.inner_content ⟨U i, hU i⟩ :=
by { have := μ.inner_content_Sup_nat (λ i, ⟨U i, hU i⟩), rwa [opens.supr_def] at this }
lemma inner_content_comap (f : G ≃ₜ G)
(h : ∀ ⦃K : compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K) (U : opens G) :
μ.inner_content (U.comap f.continuous) = μ.inner_content U :=
begin
refine supr_congr _ ((compacts.equiv f).surjective) _,
intro K, refine supr_congr_Prop image_subset_iff _,
intro hK, simp only [equiv.coe_fn_mk, subtype.mk_eq_mk, ennreal.coe_eq_coe, compacts.equiv],
apply h,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma is_mul_left_invariant_inner_content [group G] [topological_group G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : compacts G}, μ (K.map _ $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(U : opens G) : μ.inner_content (U.comap $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ.inner_content U :=
by convert μ.inner_content_comap (homeomorph.mul_left g) (λ K, h g) U
@[to_additive]
lemma inner_content_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [t2_space G] [group G] [topological_group G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : compacts G}, μ (K.map _ $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ K)
(K : compacts G) (hK : 0 < μ K) (U : opens G) (hU : (U : set G).nonempty) :
0 < μ.inner_content U :=
begin
have : (interior (U : set G)).nonempty, rwa [U.prop.interior_eq],
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates K.2 this with ⟨s, hs⟩,
suffices : μ K ≤ s.card * μ.inner_content U,
{ exact (ennreal.mul_pos.mp $ lt_of_lt_of_le hK this).2 },
have : K.1 ⊆ ↑⨆ (g ∈ s), U.comap $ continuous_mul_left g,
{ simpa only [opens.supr_def, opens.coe_comap, subtype.coe_mk] },
refine (μ.le_inner_content _ _ this).trans _,
refine (rel_supr_sum (μ.inner_content) (μ.inner_content_empty) (≤)
(μ.inner_content_Sup_nat) _ _).trans _,
simp only [μ.is_mul_left_invariant_inner_content h3, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, le_refl]
end
lemma inner_content_mono' ⦃U V : set G⦄
(hU : is_open U) (hV : is_open V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.inner_content ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
supr_le_supr $ λ K, supr_le_supr_const $ λ hK, subset.trans hK h2
/-- Extending a content on compact sets to an outer measure on all sets. -/
protected def outer_measure : outer_measure G :=
induced_outer_measure (λ U hU, μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩) is_open_empty μ.inner_content_empty
variables [t2_space G]
lemma outer_measure_opens (U : opens G) : μ.outer_measure U = μ.inner_content U :=
induced_outer_measure_eq' (λ _, is_open_Union) μ.inner_content_Union_nat μ.inner_content_mono U.2
lemma outer_measure_of_is_open (U : set G) (hU : is_open U) :
μ.outer_measure U = μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
μ.outer_measure_opens ⟨U, hU⟩
lemma outer_measure_le
(U : opens G) (K : compacts G) (hUK : (U : set G) ⊆ K.1) : μ.outer_measure U ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outer_measure_opens U).le.trans $ μ.inner_content_le U K hUK
lemma le_outer_measure_compacts (K : compacts G) : μ K ≤ μ.outer_measure K.1 :=
begin
rw [content.outer_measure, induced_outer_measure_eq_infi],
{ exact le_infi (λ U, le_infi $ λ hU, le_infi $ μ.le_inner_content K ⟨U, hU⟩) },
{ exact μ.inner_content_Union_nat },
{ exact μ.inner_content_mono }
end
lemma outer_measure_eq_infi (A : set G) :
μ.outer_measure A = ⨅ (U : set G) (hU : is_open U) (h : A ⊆ U), μ.inner_content ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
induced_outer_measure_eq_infi _ μ.inner_content_Union_nat μ.inner_content_mono A
lemma outer_measure_interior_compacts (K : compacts G) : μ.outer_measure (interior K.1) ≤ μ K :=
le_trans (le_of_eq $ μ.outer_measure_opens (opens.interior K.1))
(μ.inner_content_le _ _ interior_subset)
lemma outer_measure_exists_compact {U : opens G} (hU : μ.outer_measure U < ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ K : compacts G, K.1 ⊆ U ∧ μ.outer_measure U ≤ μ.outer_measure K.1 + ε :=
begin
rw [μ.outer_measure_opens] at hU ⊢,
rcases μ.inner_content_exists_compact hU hε with ⟨K, h1K, h2K⟩,
exact ⟨K, h1K, le_trans h2K $ add_le_add_right (μ.le_outer_measure_compacts K) _⟩,
end
lemma outer_measure_exists_open {A : set G} (hA : μ.outer_measure A < ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ U : opens G, A ⊆ U ∧ μ.outer_measure U ≤ μ.outer_measure A + ε :=
begin
rcases induced_outer_measure_exists_set _ _ μ.inner_content_mono hA hε with ⟨U, hU, h2U, h3U⟩,
exact ⟨⟨U, hU⟩, h2U, h3U⟩, swap, exact μ.inner_content_Union_nat
end
lemma outer_measure_preimage (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(A : set G) : μ.outer_measure (f ⁻¹' A) = μ.outer_measure A :=
begin
refine induced_outer_measure_preimage _ μ.inner_content_Union_nat μ.inner_content_mono _
(λ s, f.is_open_preimage) _,
intros s hs, convert μ.inner_content_comap f h ⟨s, hs⟩
end
lemma outer_measure_lt_top_of_is_compact [locally_compact_space G]
{K : set G} (hK : is_compact K) : μ.outer_measure K < ∞ :=
begin
rcases exists_compact_superset hK with ⟨F, h1F, h2F⟩,
calc
μ.outer_measure K ≤ μ.outer_measure (interior F) : outer_measure.mono' _ h2F
... ≤ μ ⟨F, h1F⟩ :
by apply μ.outer_measure_le ⟨interior F, is_open_interior⟩ ⟨F, h1F⟩ interior_subset
... < ⊤ : μ.lt_top _
end
@[to_additive]
lemma is_mul_left_invariant_outer_measure [group G] [topological_group G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : compacts G}, μ (K.map _ $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(A : set G) : μ.outer_measure ((λ h, g * h) ⁻¹' A) = μ.outer_measure A :=
by convert μ.outer_measure_preimage (homeomorph.mul_left g) (λ K, h g) A
lemma outer_measure_caratheodory (A : set G) :
μ.outer_measure.caratheodory.measurable_set' A ↔ ∀ (U : opens G),
μ.outer_measure (U ∩ A) + μ.outer_measure (U \ A) ≤ μ.outer_measure U :=
begin
dsimp [opens], rw subtype.forall,
apply induced_outer_measure_caratheodory,
apply inner_content_Union_nat,
apply inner_content_mono'
end
@[to_additive]
lemma outer_measure_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [group G] [topological_group G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : compacts G}, μ (K.map _ $ continuous_mul_left g) = μ K)
(K : compacts G) (hK : 0 < μ K) {U : set G} (h1U : is_open U) (h2U : U.nonempty) :
0 < μ.outer_measure U :=
by { convert μ.inner_content_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant h3 K hK ⟨U, h1U⟩ h2U,
exact μ.outer_measure_opens ⟨U, h1U⟩ }
variables [S : measurable_space G] [borel_space G]
include S
/-- For the outer measure coming from a content, all Borel sets are measurable. -/
lemma borel_le_caratheodory : S ≤ μ.outer_measure.caratheodory :=
begin
rw [@borel_space.measurable_eq G _ _],
refine measurable_space.generate_from_le _,
intros U hU,
rw μ.outer_measure_caratheodory,
intro U',
rw μ.outer_measure_of_is_open ((U' : set G) ∩ U) (is_open.inter U'.prop hU),
simp only [inner_content, supr_subtype'], rw [opens.coe_mk],
haveI : nonempty {L : compacts G // L.1 ⊆ U' ∩ U} := ⟨⟨⊥, empty_subset _⟩⟩,
rw [ennreal.supr_add],
refine supr_le _, rintro ⟨L, hL⟩, simp only [subset_inter_iff] at hL,
have : ↑U' \ U ⊆ U' \ L.1 := diff_subset_diff_right hL.2,
refine le_trans (add_le_add_left (μ.outer_measure.mono' this) _) _,
rw μ.outer_measure_of_is_open (↑U' \ L.1) (is_open.sdiff U'.2 L.2.is_closed),
simp only [inner_content, supr_subtype'], rw [opens.coe_mk],
haveI : nonempty {M : compacts G // M.1 ⊆ ↑U' \ L.1} := ⟨⟨⊥, empty_subset _⟩⟩,
rw [ennreal.add_supr], refine supr_le _, rintro ⟨M, hM⟩, simp only [subset_diff] at hM,
have : (L ⊔ M).1 ⊆ U',
{ simp only [union_subset_iff, compacts.sup_val, hM, hL, and_self] },
rw μ.outer_measure_of_is_open ↑U' U'.2,
refine le_trans (ge_of_eq _) (μ.le_inner_content _ _ this),
exact μ.sup_disjoint _ _ hM.2.symm,
end
/-- The measure induced by the outer measure coming from a content, on the Borel sigma-algebra. -/
def measure : measure G := μ.outer_measure.to_measure μ.borel_le_caratheodory
lemma measure_apply {s : set G} (hs : measurable_set s) : μ.measure s = μ.outer_measure s :=
to_measure_apply _ _ hs
/-- In a locally compact space, any measure constructed from a content is regular. -/
instance regular [locally_compact_space G] : μ.measure.regular :=
begin
split,
{ intros K hK,
rw [measure_apply _ hK.measurable_set],
exact μ.outer_measure_lt_top_of_is_compact hK },
{ intros A hA,
rw [measure_apply _ hA, outer_measure_eq_infi],
refine binfi_le_binfi _,
intros U hU,
refine infi_le_infi _,
intro h2U,
rw [measure_apply _ hU.measurable_set, μ.outer_measure_of_is_open U hU],
refl' },
{ intros U hU,
rw [measure_apply _ hU.measurable_set, μ.outer_measure_of_is_open U hU],
dsimp only [inner_content], refine bsupr_le (λ K hK, _),
refine le_supr_of_le K.1 _, refine le_supr_of_le K.2 _, refine le_supr_of_le hK _,
rw [measure_apply _ K.2.measurable_set],
apply le_outer_measure_compacts },
end
end content
end measure_theory
|
0f5262c889ab3e30d24aac13fa81846893eff974 | 1e561612e7479c100cd9302e3fe08cbd2914aa25 | /mathlib4_experiments/Data/List/Basic.lean | c9854d053b58c3ef1f213628c478e3ed0567cc33 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib4_experiments | 8de8ed7193f70748a7529e05d831203a7c64eedb | 87cb879b4d602c8ecfd9283b7c0b06015abdbab1 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,971,389,316 | 1,620,336,942,000 | 1,620,336,942,000 | 353,994,588 | 7 | 4 | Apache-2.0 | 1,622,410,748,000 | 1,617,361,732,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 196,651 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
--import algebra.order_functions
--import control.monad.basic
--import data.nat.choose.basic
--import order.rel_classes
import mathlib4_experiments.CoreExt
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
open Function Nat
namespace List
#check Nat
#exit
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
by
induction l with b l ih, {cases h}, rcases h with rfl | h,
{ exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end List
/-
TO BE PORTED
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
instance : is_left_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ nil_append ⟩
instance : is_right_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ append_nil ⟩
instance : is_associative (list α) has_append.append :=
⟨ append_assoc ⟩
theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem cons_ne_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ l :=
mt (congr_arg length) (nat.succ_ne_self _)
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
theorem cons_inj (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
cons_injective.eq_iff
theorem exists_cons_of_ne_nil {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) : ∃ b L, l = b :: L :=
by { induction l with c l', contradiction, use [c,l'], }
/-! ### mem -/
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, or.inl⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
classical.by_cases or.inl $ assume : a ≠ b, h.elim or.inl $ assume h, or.inr ⟨this, h⟩
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
-- kmb ported mem_split
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{cases h},
{rcases h with rfl | h,
{exact or.inl rfl},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) :
∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{cases h},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{exact ⟨c, mem_cons_self _ _, h.symm⟩},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, mem_cons_of_mem _ ha₁, ha₂⟩ }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
lemma forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ l.map f, P i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ l, P (f j) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H j hj,
exact H (f j) (mem_map_of_mem f hj) },
{ assume H i hi,
rcases mem_map.1 hi with ⟨j, hj, ji⟩,
rw ← ji,
exact H j hj }
end
@[simp] lemma map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} : list.map f l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨by cases l; simp only [forall_prop_of_true, map, forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff],
λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp only [join, mem_append, @mem_join L, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right,
exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} :
b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [cons_bind, map_append, bind_map l]
/-! ### length -/
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_singleton (a : α) : length [a] = 1 := rfl
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_length_pos {l : list α} : 0 < length l → l ≠ [] :=
λ h1 h2, lt_irrefl 0 ((length_eq_zero.2 h2).subst h1)
theorem length_pos_of_ne_nil {l : list α} : l ≠ [] → 0 < length l :=
λ h, pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ λ h0, h $ length_eq_zero.1 h0
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
lemma exists_mem_of_ne_nil (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []) : ∃ x, x ∈ l :=
exists_mem_of_length_pos (length_pos_of_ne_nil h)
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma exists_of_length_succ {n} :
∀ l : list α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [] H := absurd H.symm $ succ_ne_zero n
| (h :: t) H := ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : injective (list.length : list α → ℕ) ↔ subsingleton α :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, refine ⟨λ x y, _⟩, suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, refl },
{ intros hα l1 l2 hl, induction l1 generalizing l2; cases l2,
{ refl }, { cases hl }, { cases hl },
congr, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _, apply l1_ih, simpa using hl }
end
@[simp] lemma length_injective [subsingleton α] : injective (length : list α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr $ by apply_instance
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
lemma empty_eq : (∅ : list α) = [] := by refl
lemma singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : list α) = [x] := rfl
lemma insert_neg [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∉ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
if_neg h
lemma insert_pos [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∈ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = l :=
if_pos h
lemma doubleton_eq [decidable_eq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : list α) = [x, y] :=
by { rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq], rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton] }
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem forall_mem_cons : ∀ {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α},
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
ball_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (mem_cons_self _ _) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (mem_cons_of_mem _ xl) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, left, exact px end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp only [subset_def, mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
@[simp] theorem append_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, simp only [subset_def] at *, split; intros; simp* },
{ rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩, apply append_subset_of_subset_of_subset h1 h2 }
end
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp only [mem_map, not_and, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (h : injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_subset f⟩, intros h2 x hx,
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩,
cases h hxx', exact hx'
end
/-! ### append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma singleton_append {x : α} {l : list α} : [x] ++ l = x :: l := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp only [nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, false_and]
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp only [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c, nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true,
true_and, false_and, exists_false, false_or, or_false, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left']
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { rw nil_append, split,
{ rintro rfl, left, exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨a', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', H, rfl⟩), {refl}, {rw [← append_assoc, ← H], refl} } },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp only [cons_append, nil_append, false_and, exists_false, false_or, exists_eq_left'],
exact eq_comm },
{ simp only [cons_append, @eq_comm _ a, ih, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left,
exists_and_distrib_left] } }
end
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp only [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs, take, drop]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := congr_arg (cons x) $ take_append_drop n xs
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj :
∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) :
s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp only [length_append] at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_right h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_left' h rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : list α) : function.injective (λ t, s ++ t) :=
λ t₁ t₂, append_left_cancel
theorem append_right_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_right_injective s).eq_iff
theorem append_left_injective (t : list α) : function.injective (λ s, s ++ t) :=
λ s₁ s₂, append_right_cancel
theorem append_left_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_left_injective t).eq_iff
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
/-! ### repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ b = a
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := by simp [mem_repeat]
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} {n} (h : b ∈ repeat a n) : b = a :=
(mem_repeat.1 h).2
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H := by cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂;
unfold length repeat; congr; [exact H₁, exact eq_repeat_of_mem H₂]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp only [*, zero_add, succ_add, repeat]; split; refl
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem join_repeat_nil (n : ℕ) : join (repeat [] n) = @nil α :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, join, append_nil]]
lemma repeat_left_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
function.injective (λ a : α, repeat a n) :=
λ a b h, (eq_repeat.1 h).2 _ $ mem_repeat.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
lemma repeat_left_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
repeat a n = repeat b n ↔ a = b :=
(repeat_left_injective hn).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma repeat_left_inj' {a b : α} :
∀ {n}, repeat a n = repeat b n ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := (repeat_left_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans $ by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
lemma repeat_right_injective (a : α) : function.injective (repeat a) :=
function.left_inverse.injective (length_repeat a)
@[simp] lemma repeat_right_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} :
repeat a n = repeat a m ↔ n = m :=
(repeat_right_injective a).eq_iff
/-! ### pure -/
@[simp] theorem mem_pure {α} (x y : α) :
x ∈ (pure y : list α) ↔ x = y := by simp! [pure,list.ret]
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
-- TODO: duplicate of a lemma in core
theorem bind_append (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
append_bind _ _ _
@[simp] theorem bind_singleton (f : α → list β) (x : α) : [x].bind f = f x :=
append_nil (f x)
/-! ### concat -/
theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp only [*, concat]; split; refl
theorem init_eq_of_concat_eq {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : concat l₁ a = concat l₂ a → l₁ = l₂ :=
begin
intro h,
rw [concat_eq_append, concat_eq_append] at h,
exact append_right_cancel h
end
theorem last_eq_of_concat_eq {a b : α} {l : list α} : concat l a = concat l b → a = b :=
begin
intro h,
rw [concat_eq_append, concat_eq_append] at h,
exact head_eq_of_cons_eq (append_left_cancel h)
end
theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by simp
theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by simp
theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, length_append, length]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by simp
/-! ### reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, cons_append]],
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, reverse_cons, append_assoc]];
refl
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; [rw [nil_append, reverse_nil, append_nil],
simp only [*, cons_append, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]
theorem reverse_concat (l : list α) (a : α) : reverse (concat l a) = a :: reverse l :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, reverse_append, reverse_singleton, singleton_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, reverse_append]]; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_involutive : involutive (@reverse α) :=
λ l, reverse_reverse l
@[simp] theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
lemma reverse_eq_iff {l l' : list α} :
l.reverse = l' ↔ l = l'.reverse :=
reverse_involutive.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, length_append, length]]
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map, reverse_cons, map_append]]
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [reverse_core_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, mem_cons_iff,
not_mem_nil, false_or, or_false, or_comm]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp only [length_reverse, length_repeat],
λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
/-! ### empty -/
attribute [simp] list.empty
lemma empty_iff_eq_nil {l : list α} : l.empty ↔ l = [] :=
list.cases_on l (by simp) (by simp)
/-! ### init -/
@[simp] theorem length_init : ∀ (l : list α), length (init l) = length l - 1
| [] := rfl
| [a] := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) :=
begin
rw init,
simp only [add_left_inj, length, succ_add_sub_one],
exact length_init (b :: l)
end
/-! ### last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l;
[refl, simp only [cons_append, last_cons _ (λ H, cons_ne_nil _ _ (append_eq_nil.1 H).2), *]]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, last_append]
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem init_append_last : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), init l ++ [last l h] = l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := rfl
| (a::b::l) h :=
begin
rw [init, cons_append, last_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _) (cons_ne_nil _ _)],
congr,
exact init_append_last (cons_ne_nil b l)
end
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
theorem last_mem : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), last l h ∈ l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := or.inl rfl
| (a::b::l) h := or.inr $ by { rw [last_cons_cons], exact last_mem (cons_ne_nil b l) }
lemma last_repeat_succ (a m : ℕ) :
(repeat a m.succ).last (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ
(show (repeat a m.succ).length = m.succ, by rw length_repeat)) = a :=
begin
induction m with k IH,
{ simp },
{ simpa only [repeat_succ, last] }
end
/-! ### last' -/
@[simp] theorem last'_is_none :
∀ {l : list α}, (last' l).is_none ↔ l = []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_none (b::l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_is_some : ∀ {l : list α}, l.last'.is_some ↔ l ≠ []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_some (b::l)]
theorem mem_last'_eq_last : ∀ {l : list α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.last' → ∃ h, x = last l h
| [] x hx := false.elim $ by simpa using hx
| [a] x hx := have a = x, by simpa using hx, this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| (a::b::l) x hx :=
begin
rw last' at hx,
rcases mem_last'_eq_last hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
use cons_ne_nil _ _,
rwa [last_cons]
end
theorem mem_of_mem_last' {l : list α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.last') : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_last'_eq_last ha in h₂.symm ▸ last_mem _
theorem init_append_last' : ∀ {l : list α} (a ∈ l.last'), init l ++ [a] = l
| [] a ha := (option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a] _ rfl := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) c hc := by { rw [last'] at hc, rw [init, cons_append, init_append_last' _ hc] }
theorem ilast_eq_last' [inhabited α] : ∀ l : list α, l.ilast = l.last'.iget
| [] := by simp [ilast, arbitrary]
| [a] := rfl
| [a, b] := rfl
| [a, b, c] := rfl
| (a :: b :: c :: l) := by simp [ilast, ilast_eq_last' (c :: l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_append_cons : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (a : α) (l₂ : list α),
last' (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = last' (a :: l₂)
| [] a l₂ := rfl
| [b] a l₂ := rfl
| (b::c::l₁) a l₂ := by rw [cons_append, cons_append, last', ← cons_append, last'_append_cons]
theorem last'_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : list α) : ∀ {l₂ : list α} (hl₂ : l₂ ≠ []),
last' (l₁ ++ l₂) = last' l₂
| [] hl₂ := by contradiction
| (b::l₂) _ := last'_append_cons l₁ b l₂
/-! ### head(') and tail -/
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
theorem mem_of_mem_head' {x : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, x ∈ l.head' → x ∈ l
| [] h := (option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| (a::l) h := by { simp only [head', option.mem_def] at h, exact h ▸ or.inl rfl }
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, refl}
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] :=
by { induction l, contradiction, rw [tail,cons_append,tail], }
theorem cons_head'_tail : ∀ {l : list α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ head' l), a :: tail l = l
| [] a h := by contradiction
| (b::l) a h := by { simp at h, simp [h] }
theorem head_mem_head' [inhabited α] : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), head l ∈ head' l
| [] h := by contradiction
| (a::l) h := rfl
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
cons_head'_tail (head_mem_head' h)
lemma head_mem_self [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head ∈ l :=
begin
have h' := mem_cons_self l.head l.tail,
rwa cons_head_tail h at h',
end
@[simp] theorem head'_map (f : α → β) (l) : head' (map f l) = (head' l).map f := by cases l; refl
lemma tail_append_of_ne_nil (l l' : list α) (h : l ≠ []) :
(l ++ l').tail = l.tail ++ l' :=
begin
cases l,
{ contradiction },
{ simp }
end
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ rw reverse_cons, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
def bidirectional_rec {C : list α → Sort*}
(H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ (a : α), C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : ∀ l, C l
| [] := H0
| [a] := H1 a
| (a :: b :: l) :=
let l' := init (b :: l), b' := last (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) in
have length l' < length (a :: b :: l), by { change _ < length l + 2, simp },
begin
rw ←init_append_last (cons_ne_nil b l),
have : C l', from bidirectional_rec l',
exact Hn a l' b' ‹C l'›
end
using_well_founded { rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf list.length⟩] }
/-- Like `bidirectional_rec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def bidirectional_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ (a : α), C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectional_rec H0 H1 Hn l
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem sublist.append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) :
l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h, { left, exact ‹l <+ l₂› }, { right, apply mem_cons_self } },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem sublist.reverse {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih, {refl},
{ rw reverse_cons, exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left ih },
{ rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons], exact ih.append_right [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist_iff]
using h.reverse,
λ h, h.append_right l⟩
theorem sublist.append {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α}
(hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem sublist.subset : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ s.subset
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_repeat] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/-! ### index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _) },
simp only [length, mem_cons_iff, index_of_cons], split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) (λ H, H $ or.inl h) },
{ simp only [h, false_or], rw ← ih, exact succ_inj' }
end
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {refl},
simp only [length, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b, {rw if_pos h, exact nat.zero_le _},
rw if_neg h, exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, decidable.by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/-! ### nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_len_le : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, length l ≤ n → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_len_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_len_le hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
@[simp]
theorem nth_eq_none_iff : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, nth l n = none ↔ length l ≤ n :=
begin
intros, split,
{ intro h, by_contradiction h',
have h₂ : ∃ h, l.nth_le n h = l.nth_le n (lt_of_not_ge h') := ⟨lt_of_not_ge h', rfl⟩,
rw [← nth_eq_some, h] at h₂, cases h₂ },
{ solve_by_elim [nth_len_le] },
end
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
lemma nth_zero (l : list α) : l.nth 0 = l.head' := by cases l; refl
lemma nth_injective {α : Type u} {xs : list α} {i j : ℕ}
(h₀ : i < xs.length)
(h₁ : nodup xs)
(h₂ : xs.nth i = xs.nth j) : i = j :=
begin
induction xs with x xs generalizing i j,
{ cases h₀ },
{ cases i; cases j,
case nat.zero nat.zero
{ refl },
case nat.succ nat.succ
{ congr, cases h₁,
apply xs_ih;
solve_by_elim [lt_of_succ_lt_succ] },
iterate 2
{ dsimp at h₂,
cases h₁ with _ _ h h',
cases h x _ rfl,
rw mem_iff_nth,
exact ⟨_, h₂.symm⟩ <|>
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩ } },
end
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
/-- A version of `nth_le_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem nth_le_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nth_le l n H) = nth_le (map f l) n ((length_map f l).symm ▸ H) :=
(nth_le_map f _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
/-- If one has `nth_le L i hi` in a formula and `h : L = L'`, one can not `rw h` in the formula as
`hi` gives `i < L.length` and not `i < L'.length`. The lemma `nth_le_of_eq` can be used to make
such a rewrite, with `rw (nth_le_of_eq h)`. -/
lemma nth_le_of_eq {L L' : list α} (h : L = L') {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le L' i (h ▸ hi) :=
by { congr, exact h}
@[simp] lemma nth_le_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) :
nth_le [a] n hn = a :=
have hn0 : n = 0 := le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_lt_succ hn),
by subst hn0; refl
lemma nth_le_zero [inhabited α] {L : list α} (h : 0 < L.length) :
L.nth_le 0 h = L.head :=
by { cases L, cases h, simp, }
lemma nth_le_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn₁) (hn₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n hn₁ = l₁.nth_le n hn₂
| [] _ n hn₁ hn₂ := (not_lt_zero _ hn₂).elim
| (a::l) _ 0 hn₁ hn₂ := rfl
| (a::l) _ (n+1) hn₁ hn₂ := by simp only [nth_le, cons_append];
exact nth_le_append _ _
lemma nth_le_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}
(h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂ : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length) : n - l₁.length < l₂.length :=
begin
rw list.length_append at h₂,
convert (nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff h₁).mpr h₂,
simp,
end
lemma nth_le_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n h₂ = l₂.nth_le (n - l₁.length) (nth_le_append_right_aux h₁ h₂)
| [] _ n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) _ (n+1) h₁ h₂ :=
begin
dsimp,
conv { to_rhs, congr, skip, rw [←nat.sub_sub, nat.sub.right_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel], },
rw nth_le_append_right (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₁),
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_repeat (a : α) {n m : ℕ} (h : m < (list.repeat a n).length) :
(list.repeat a n).nth_le m h = a :=
eq_of_mem_repeat (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma nth_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₁.nth n :=
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := lt_of_lt_of_le hn
(by rw length_append; exact le_add_right _ _),
by rw [nth_le_nth hn, nth_le_nth hn', nth_le_append]
lemma nth_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : l₁.length ≤ n) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₂.nth (n - l₁.length) :=
begin
by_cases hl : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length,
{ rw [nth_le_nth hl, nth_le_nth, nth_le_append_right hn] },
{ rw [nth_len_le (le_of_not_lt hl), nth_len_le],
rw [not_lt, length_append] at hl,
exact nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le hl }
end
lemma last_eq_nth_le : ∀ (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []),
last l h = l.nth_le (l.length - 1) (sub_lt (length_pos_of_ne_nil h) one_pos)
| [] h := rfl
| [a] h := by rw [last_singleton, nth_le_singleton]
| (a :: b :: l) h := by { rw [last_cons, last_eq_nth_le (b :: l)],
refl, exact cons_ne_nil b l }
@[simp] lemma nth_concat_length : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).nth l.length = some a
| [] a := rfl
| (b::l) a := by rw [cons_append, length_cons, nth, nth_concat_length]
lemma nth_le_cons_length (x : α) (xs : list α) (n : ℕ) (h : n = xs.length) :
(x :: xs).nth_le n (by simp [h]) = (x :: xs).last (cons_ne_nil x xs) :=
begin
rw last_eq_nth_le,
congr,
simp [h]
end
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa;
simp only [aa, ext (λn, h (n+1))]; split; refl
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by { rw [nth_len_le h₁, nth_len_le], rwa [←hl], }
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} :
∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b;
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, index_of_cons, nth_le, @index_of_nth_le l]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 :
∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i :=
by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, from add_right_comm i (length l) 1);
exact λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
lemma index_of_inj [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) : index_of x l = index_of y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, have nth_le l (index_of x l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hx) =
nth_le l (index_of y l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hy),
by simp only [h],
by simpa only [index_of_nth_le],
λ h, by subst h⟩
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
lemma nth_le_reverse' (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.reverse.length) (hn') :
l.reverse.nth_le n hn = l.nth_le (l.length - 1 - n) hn' :=
begin
rw eq_comm,
convert nth_le_reverse l.reverse _ _ _ using 1,
{ simp },
{ simpa }
end
lemma eq_cons_of_length_one {l : list α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nth_le 0 (h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)] :=
begin
refine ext_le (by convert h) (λ n h₁ h₂, _),
simp only [nth_le_singleton],
congr,
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₂)
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail {f g : list α → list α} (m : ℕ) :
∀n (l:list α), (l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g (m + n) =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g m) n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail n l)
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le
{f g : list α → list α} (m n : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g m =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g (m - n)) n :=
begin
rcases le_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail]
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same {f g : list α → list α} (n : ℕ) (l:list α) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g n = l.modify_nth_tail (g ∘ f) n :=
by rw [modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le n n l (le_refl n), nat.sub_self]; refl
lemma modify_nth_tail_id :
∀n (l:list α), l.modify_nth_tail id n = l
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_id n l)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m;
simp only [h, if_pos, if_true, if_false, option.map_none, option.map_some, mt succ.inj,
not_false_iff]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_length]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_eq]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_ne _ _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_nil (n : ℕ) (a : α) : [].update_nth n a = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma update_nth_succ (x : α) (xs : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(x :: xs).update_nth n.succ a = x :: xs.update_nth n a := rfl
lemma update_nth_comm (a b : α) : Π {n m : ℕ} (l : list α) (h : n ≠ m),
(l.update_nth n a).update_nth m b = (l.update_nth m b).update_nth n a
| _ _ [] _ := by simp
| 0 0 (x :: t) h := absurd rfl h
| (n + 1) 0 (x :: t) h := by simp [list.update_nth]
| 0 (m + 1) (x :: t) h := by simp [list.update_nth]
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (x :: t) h := by { simp only [update_nth, true_and, eq_self_iff_true],
exact update_nth_comm t (λ h', h $ nat.succ_inj'.mpr h'), }
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_eq (l : list α) (i : ℕ) (a : α)
(h : i < (l.update_nth i a).length) : (l.update_nth i a).nth_le i h = a :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← nth_le_nth, nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth]; simp * at *
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_of_ne {l : list α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.update_nth i a).length) :
(l.update_nth i a).nth_le j hj = l.nth_le j (by simpa using hj) :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, list.nth_update_nth_ne _ _ h, list.nth_le_nth]
lemma mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ l.update_nth n b), a ∈ l ∨ a = b
| [] n a b h := false.elim h
| (c::l) 0 a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
or.inr (or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _)
| (c::l) (n+1) a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
(λ h, h ▸ or.inl (mem_cons_self _ _))
(λ h, (mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth h).elim
(or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _) or.inr)
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_nil (a : α) : insert_nth 0 a [] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_succ_nil (n : ℕ) (a : α) : insert_nth (n + 1) a [] = [] := rfl
lemma length_insert_nth : ∀n as, n ≤ length as → length (insert_nth n a as) = length as + 1
| 0 as h := rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := congr_arg nat.succ $ length_insert_nth n as (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth (n:ℕ) (l : list α) : (l.insert_nth n a).remove_nth n = l :=
by rw [remove_nth_eq_nth_tail, insert_nth, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same];
from modify_nth_tail_id _ _
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge : ∀n m as, n < length as → n ≤ m →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth (m + 1) a).remove_nth n
| 0 0 [] has _ := (lt_irrefl _ has).elim
| 0 0 (a::as) has hmn := by simp [remove_nth, insert_nth]
| 0 (m+1) (a::as) has hmn := rfl
| (n+1) (m+1) (a::as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≤ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth m a).remove_nth (n + 1)
| n 0 (a :: as) has hmn := rfl
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (a :: as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) :
∀(i j : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≤ length l),
(l.insert_nth i a).insert_nth (j + 1) b = (l.insert_nth j b).insert_nth i a
| 0 j l := by simp [insert_nth]
| (i + 1) 0 l := assume h, (nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
| (i + 1) (j+1) [] := by simp
| (i + 1) (j+1) (c::l) :=
assume h₀ h₁,
by simp [insert_nth];
exact insert_nth_comm i j l (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₁)
lemma mem_insert_nth {a b : α} : ∀ {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (hi : n ≤ l.length),
a ∈ l.insert_nth n b ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l
| 0 as h := iff.rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := begin
dsimp [list.insert_nth],
erw [list.mem_cons_iff, mem_insert_nth (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h), list.mem_cons_iff,
← or.assoc, or_comm (a = a'), or.assoc]
end
end insert_nth
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] lemma map_nil (f : α → β) : map f [] = [] := rfl
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
map f l = foldr (λ a bs, f a :: bs) [] l :=
by induction l; simp *
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h in
by rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
lemma map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : list α} : map f l = map g l ↔ (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_congr⟩, intros h x hx,
rw [mem_iff_nth_le] at hx, rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩,
rw [nth_le_map_rev f, nth_le_map_rev g], congr, exact h
end
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]; split; refl
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero $ by rw [← length_map f l, h]; refl
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by unfold list.bind; induction l; simp only [map, join, list.ret, cons_append, nil_append, *];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) : f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : injective (map f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
split; intros h x y hxy,
{ suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, simp [hxy] },
{ induction y generalizing x, simpa using hxy,
cases x, simpa using hxy, simp at hxy, simp [y_ih hxy.2, h hxy.1] }
end
/--
A single `list.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `list.map` with another `list.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `list.map_map`.
-/
lemma comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : list α) :
map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) := (map_map _ _ _).symm
/--
Composing a `list.map` with another `list.map` is equal to
a single `list.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp] lemma map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) :
map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) :=
by { ext l, rw comp_map }
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (as : list α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (λ a bs, if p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as :=
by { induction as, { refl }, { simp! [*, apply_ite (map f)] } }
lemma last_map (f : α → β) {l : list α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).last (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.last hl) :=
begin
induction l with l_ih l_tl l_ih,
{ apply (hl rfl).elim },
{ cases l_tl,
{ simp },
{ simpa using l_ih } }
end
/-! ### map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_flip (f : α → β → γ) :
∀ as bs, map₂ (flip f) bs as = map₂ f as bs
| [] [] := rfl
| [] (b :: bs) := rfl
| (a :: as) [] := rfl
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) := by { simp! [map₂_flip], refl }
/-! ### take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero (l : list α) : take 0 l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_length : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_length end
theorem take_all_of_le : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, length l ≤ n → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by rw [zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp only [take_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp only [take, min_succ_succ, take_take n m l]; split; refl
theorem take_repeat (a : α) : ∀ (n m : ℕ), take n (repeat a m) = repeat a (min n m)
| n 0 := by simp
| 0 m := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_repeat]
lemma map_take {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).map f = (L.map f).take i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_take], }
lemma take_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ},
n ≤ l₁.length → (l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [list.take, list.cons_append, list.take, take_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Taking the first `l₁.length + i` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first
`i` elements of `l₂` to `l₁`. -/
lemma take_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
take (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ (take i l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, take_cons, l₁_ih, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
end
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_take (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le (L.take j) i (by { rw length_take, exact lt_min hj hi }) :=
by { rw nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm hi, exact nth_le_append _ _ }
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_take' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < (L.take j).length) :
nth_le (L.take j) i hi = nth_le L i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi (by simp [le_refl])) :=
by { simp at hi, rw nth_le_take L _ hi.1 }
lemma nth_take {l : list α} {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) :
(l.take n).nth m = l.nth m :=
begin
induction n with n hn generalizing l m,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero] at h,
exact absurd h (not_lt_of_le m.zero_le) },
{ cases l with hd tl,
{ simp only [take_nil] },
{ cases m,
{ simp only [nth, take] },
{ simpa only using hn (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) } } },
end
@[simp] lemma nth_take_of_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
(l.take (n + 1)).nth n = l.nth n :=
nth_take (nat.lt_succ_self n)
lemma take_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
l.take (n + 1) = l.take n ++ (l.nth n).to_list :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp only [option.to_list, nth, take_nil, append_nil]},
{ cases n,
{ simp only [option.to_list, nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, take, nil_append] },
{ simp only [hl, cons_append, nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, take] } }
end
@[simp] lemma take_eq_nil_iff {l : list α} {k : ℕ} :
l.take k = [] ↔ l = [] ∨ k = 0 :=
by { cases l; cases k; simp [nat.succ_ne_zero] }
lemma init_eq_take (l : list α) : l.init = l.take l.length.pred :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ simp [init] },
{ induction l with hd tl hl generalizing x,
{ simp [init], },
{ simp [init, hl] } }
end
lemma init_take {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.take n).init = l.take n.pred :=
by simp [init_eq_take, min_eq_left_of_lt h, take_take, pred_le]
@[simp] lemma drop_eq_nil_of_le {l : list α} {k : ℕ} (h : l.length ≤ k) :
l.drop k = [] :=
by simpa [←length_eq_zero] using nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h
lemma drop_eq_nil_iff_le {l : list α} {k : ℕ} :
l.drop k = [] ↔ l.length ≤ k :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, drop_eq_nil_of_le⟩,
induction k with k hk generalizing l,
{ simp only [drop] at h,
simp [h] },
{ cases l,
{ simp },
{ simp only [drop] at h,
simpa [nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using hk h } }
end
lemma tail_drop (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simp [hl] } }
end
lemma cons_nth_le_drop_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l.length) :
l.nth_le n hn :: l.drop (n + 1) = l.drop n :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ exact absurd n.zero_le (not_le_of_lt (by simpa using hn)) },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simp only [nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, list.length] at hn,
simpa [list.nth_le, list.drop] using hl hn } }
end
theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α) :=
λ _, drop_eq_nil_of_le (nat.zero_le _)
lemma mem_of_mem_drop {α} {n : ℕ} {l : list α} {x : α}
(h : x ∈ l.drop n) :
x ∈ l :=
begin
induction l generalizing n,
case list.nil : n h
{ simpa using h },
case list.cons : l_hd l_tl l_ih n h
{ cases n; simp only [mem_cons_iff, drop] at h ⊢,
{ exact h },
right, apply l_ih h },
end
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
@[simp] lemma drop_length (l : list α) : l.drop l.length = [] :=
calc l.drop l.length = (l ++ []).drop l.length : by simp
... = [] : drop_left _ _
lemma drop_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l₁.length →
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [drop, cons_append, drop, drop_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Dropping the elements up to `l₁.length + i` in `l₁ + l₂` is the same as dropping the elements
up to `i` in `l₂`. -/
lemma drop_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
drop (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop i l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, drop, l₁_ih]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : i + j < L.length) :
nth_le L (i + j) h = nth_le (L.drop i) j
begin
have A : i < L.length := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h,
rw (take_append_drop i L).symm at h,
simpa only [le_of_lt A, min_eq_left, add_lt_add_iff_left, length_take, length_append] using h
end :=
begin
have A : length (take i L) = i, by simp [le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h)],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, nth_le_append_right];
simp [A]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : j < (L.drop i).length) :
nth_le (L.drop i) j h = nth_le L (i + j) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left ((length_drop i L) ▸ h)) :=
by rw nth_le_drop
lemma nth_drop (L : list α) (i j : ℕ) :
nth (L.drop i) j = nth L (i + j) :=
begin
ext,
simp only [nth_eq_some, nth_le_drop', option.mem_def],
split;
exact λ ⟨h, ha⟩, ⟨by simpa [nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt] using h, ha⟩
end
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : ℕ) : ∀ (m) (l : list α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m [] := by simp
| 0 l := by simp
| (m+1) (a::l) :=
calc drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) : rfl
... = drop (n + m) l : drop_drop m l
... = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) : rfl
theorem drop_take : ∀ (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list α),
drop m (take (m + n) l) = take n (drop m l)
| 0 n _ := by simp
| (m+1) n nil := by simp
| (m+1) n (_::l) :=
have h: m + 1 + n = (m+n) + 1, by ac_refl,
by simpa [take_cons, h] using drop_take m n l
lemma map_drop {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.drop i).map f = (L.map f).drop i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_drop], }
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
lemma reverse_take {α} {xs : list α} (n : ℕ)
(h : n ≤ xs.length) :
xs.reverse.take n = (xs.drop (xs.length - n)).reverse :=
begin
induction xs generalizing n;
simp only [reverse_cons, drop, reverse_nil, nat.zero_sub, length, take_nil],
cases decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le h with h' h',
{ replace h' := le_of_succ_le_succ h',
rwa [take_append_of_le_length, xs_ih _ h'],
rw [show xs_tl.length + 1 - n = succ (xs_tl.length - n), from _, drop],
{ rwa [succ_eq_add_one, nat.sub_add_comm] },
{ rwa length_reverse } },
{ subst h', rw [length, nat.sub_self, drop],
suffices : xs_tl.length + 1 = (xs_tl.reverse ++ [xs_hd]).length,
by rw [this, take_length, reverse_cons],
rw [length_append, length_reverse], refl }
end
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp only [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih generalizing a, {refl},
unfold foldl,
rw [ih (λ a b bin, H a b $ mem_cons_of_mem _ bin), H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
end
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih, {refl},
simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at H,
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
end
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldl_append (f a b) l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldr_cons, foldr_append b l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join (foldl f a l) L]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join a L, foldr_cons]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, foldr]]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp only [foldr_cons, foldr_eta l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_foldl {l : list α} : reverse (foldl (λ t h, h :: t) [] l) = l :=
by rw ←foldr_reverse; simp
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldl]]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldr]]
theorem foldl_map' {α β: Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β)
(a : α) (l : list α) (h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
list.foldl f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (list.foldl f a l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ simp }, { simp [l_ih, h] }
end
theorem foldr_map' {α β: Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β)
(a : α) (l : list α) (h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
list.foldr f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (list.foldr f a l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ simp }, { simp [l_ih, h] }
end
theorem foldl_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : α → γ → α) (op' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (op a x) = op' (f a) x) : foldl op' (f a) l = f (foldl op a l) :=
eq.symm $ by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldl]] }
theorem foldr_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : γ → α → α) (op' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (op x a) = op' x (f a)) : foldr op' (f a) l = f (foldr op a l) :=
by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldr]] }
lemma injective_foldl_comp {α : Type*} {l : list (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, function.injective f) (hf : function.injective f):
function.injective (@list.foldl (α → α) (α → α) function.comp f l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing f,
{ exact hf },
{ apply l_ih (λ _ h, hl _ (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)),
apply function.injective.comp hf,
apply hl _ (list.mem_cons_self _ _) }
end
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldr`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : α → β → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldr_rec_on {C : β → Sort*} (l : list α) (op : α → β → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ (b : β) (hb : C b) (a : α) (ha : a ∈ l), C (op a b)) :
C (foldr op b l) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl IH,
{ exact hb },
{ refine hl _ _ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl),
refine IH _,
intros y hy x hx,
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx) }
end
/-- Induction principle for values produced by a `foldl`: if a property holds
for the seed element `b : β` and for all incremental `op : β → α → β`
performed on the elements `(a : α) ∈ l`. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
def foldl_rec_on {C : β → Sort*} (l : list α) (op : β → α → β) (b : β) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ (b : β) (hb : C b) (a : α) (ha : a ∈ l), C (op b a)) :
C (foldl op b l) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl IH generalizing b,
{ exact hb },
{ refine IH _ _ _,
{ intros y hy x hx,
exact hl y hy x (mem_cons_of_mem hd hx) },
{ exact hl b hb hd (mem_cons_self hd tl) } }
end
@[simp] lemma foldr_rec_on_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldr_rec_on [] op b hb hl = hb := rfl
@[simp] lemma foldr_rec_on_cons {C : β → Sort*} (x : α) (l : list α)
(op : α → β → β) (b) (hb : C b)
(hl : ∀ (b : β) (hb : C b) (a : α) (ha : a ∈ (x :: l)), C (op a b)) :
foldr_rec_on (x :: l) op b hb hl = hl _ (foldr_rec_on l op b hb
(λ b hb a ha, hl b hb a (mem_cons_of_mem _ ha))) x (mem_cons_self _ _) := rfl
@[simp] lemma foldl_rec_on_nil {C : β → Sort*} (op : β → α → β) (b) (hb : C b) (hl) :
foldl_rec_on [] op b hb hl = hb := rfl
/- scanl -/
section scanl
variables {f : β → α → β} {b : β} {a : α} {l : list α}
lemma length_scanl :
∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a [] := rfl
| a (x :: l) := by erw [length_cons, length_cons, length_scanl]
@[simp] lemma scanl_nil (b : β) : scanl f b nil = [b] := rfl
@[simp] lemma scanl_cons :
scanl f b (a :: l) = [b] ++ scanl f (f b a) l :=
by simp only [scanl, eq_self_iff_true, singleton_append, and_self]
@[simp] lemma nth_zero_scanl : (scanl f b l).nth 0 = some b :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp only [nth, scanl_nil] },
{ simp only [nth, scanl_cons, singleton_append] }
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nth_le 0 h = b :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp only [nth_le, scanl_nil] },
{ simp only [nth_le, scanl_cons, singleton_append] }
end
lemma nth_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} :
(scanl f b l).nth (i + 1) = ((scanl f b l).nth i).bind (λ x, (l.nth i).map (λ y, f x y)) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing b i,
{ symmetry,
simp only [option.bind_eq_none', nth, forall_2_true_iff, not_false_iff, option.map_none',
scanl_nil, option.not_mem_none, forall_true_iff] },
{ simp only [nth, scanl_cons, singleton_append],
cases i,
{ simp only [option.map_some', nth_zero_scanl, nth, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [hl, nth] } }
end
lemma nth_le_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nth_le (i + 1) h =
f ((scanl f b l).nth_le i (nat.lt_of_succ_lt h))
(l.nth_le i (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l))))) :=
begin
induction i with i hi generalizing b l,
{ cases l,
{ simp only [length, zero_add, scanl_nil] at h,
exact absurd h (lt_irrefl 1) },
{ simp only [scanl_cons, singleton_append, nth_le_zero_scanl, nth_le] } },
{ cases l,
{ simp only [length, add_lt_iff_neg_right, scanl_nil] at h,
exact absurd h (not_lt_of_lt nat.succ_pos') },
{ simp_rw scanl_cons,
rw nth_le_append_right _,
{ simpa only [hi, length, succ_add_sub_one] },
{ simp only [length, nat.zero_le, le_add_iff_nonneg_left] } } }
end
end scanl
/- scanr -/
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux, t, foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux_cons, foldr_cons]; split; refl
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) :=
by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp only [foldl_cons];
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; refl
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → α}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldl,foldl,foldl,← foldl_eq_of_comm',foldl,hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a [] := rfl
| a (b :: l) := by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf,foldr,foldl_eq_foldr']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → β}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)
include hf
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b::l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldr,foldr,foldr,hf,← foldr_eq_of_comm']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc];
rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### mfoldl, mfoldr, mmap -/
section mfoldl_mfoldr
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_nil (f : β → α → m β) {b} : mfoldl f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_nil (f : α → β → m β) {b} : mfoldr f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_cons {f : β → α → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldl f b (a :: l) = f b a >>= λ b', mfoldl f b' l := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_cons {f : α → β → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldr f b (a :: l) = mfoldr f b l >>= f a := rfl
theorem mfoldr_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
mfoldr f b l = foldr (λ a mb, mb >>= f a) (pure b) l :=
by induction l; simp *
attribute [simp] mmap mmap'
variables [is_lawful_monad m]
theorem mfoldl_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
mfoldl f b l = foldl (λ mb a, mb >>= λ b, f b a) (pure b) l :=
begin
suffices h : ∀ (mb : m β),
(mb >>= λ b, mfoldl f b l) = foldl (λ mb a, mb >>= λ b, f b a) mb l,
by simp [←h (pure b)],
induction l; intro,
{ simp },
{ simp only [mfoldl, foldl, ←l_ih] with monad_norm }
end
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_append {f : β → α → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldl f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldl f b l₁ >>= λ x, mfoldl f x l₂
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldl_nil, pure_bind]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [cons_append, mfoldl_cons, mfoldl_append, bind_assoc]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_append {f : α → β → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldr f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldr f b l₂ >>= λ x, mfoldr f x l₁
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldr_nil, bind_pure]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [mfoldr_cons, cons_append, mfoldr_append, bind_assoc]
end mfoldl_mfoldr
/-! ### prod and sum -/
-- list.sum was already defined in defs.lean, but we couldn't tag it with `to_additive` yet.
attribute [to_additive] list.prod
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton : [a].prod = a := one_mul a
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
/-- If zero is an element of a list `L`, then `list.prod L = 0`. If the domain is a nontrivial
monoid with zero with no divisors, then this implication becomes an `iff`, see
`list.prod_eq_zero_iff`. -/
theorem prod_eq_zero {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] {L : list M₀} (h : (0 : M₀) ∈ L) :
L.prod = 0 :=
begin
induction L with a L ihL,
{ exact absurd h (not_mem_nil _) },
{ rw prod_cons,
cases (mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h with ha hL,
exacts [mul_eq_zero_of_left ha.symm _, mul_eq_zero_of_right _ (ihL hL)] }
end
/-- Product of elements of a list `L` equals zero if and only if `0 ∈ L`. See also
`list.prod_eq_zero` for an implication that needs weaker typeclass assumptions. -/
@[simp] theorem prod_eq_zero_iff {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] [nontrivial M₀]
[no_zero_divisors M₀] {L : list M₀} :
L.prod = 0 ↔ (0 : M₀) ∈ L :=
begin
induction L with a L ihL,
{ simp },
{ rw [prod_cons, mul_eq_zero, ihL, mem_cons_iff, eq_comm] }
end
theorem prod_ne_zero {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] [nontrivial M₀] [no_zero_divisors M₀]
{L : list M₀} (hL : (0 : M₀) ∉ L) : L.prod ≠ 0 :=
mt prod_eq_zero_iff.1 hL
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr : l.prod = foldr (*) 1 l :=
list.rec_on l rfl $ λ a l ihl, by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, ihl]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (l : list α) {r : β → γ → Prop}
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀⦃a b c⦄, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ a l hl, by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl])
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom [monoid β] (l : list α) (f : α →* β) :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod :=
by { simp only [prod, foldl_map, f.map_one.symm],
exact l.foldl_hom _ _ _ 1 f.map_mul }
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_is_unit [monoid β] : Π {L : list β} (u : ∀ m ∈ L, is_unit m), is_unit L.prod
| [] _ := by simp
| (h :: t) u :=
begin
simp only [list.prod_cons],
exact is_unit.mul (u h (mem_cons_self h t)) (prod_is_unit (λ m mt, u m (mem_cons_of_mem h mt)))
end
-- `to_additive` chokes on the next few lemmas, so we do them by hand below
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_mul_prod_drop :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ, mul_assoc], }
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : list α) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
lemma prod_update_nth : ∀ (L : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α),
(L.update_nth n a).prod =
(L.take n).prod * (if n < L.length then a else 1) * (L.drop (n + 1)).prod
| (x::xs) 0 a := by simp [update_nth]
| (x::xs) (i+1) a := by simp [update_nth, prod_update_nth xs i a, mul_assoc]
| [] _ _ := by simp [update_nth, (nat.zero_le _).not_lt]
end monoid
section group
variables [group α]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv_rev` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg_rev`"]
lemma prod_inv_reverse : ∀ (L : list α), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).reverse.prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [prod_inv_reverse xs]
/-- A non-commutative variant of `list.prod_reverse` -/
@[to_additive "A non-commutative variant of `list.sum_reverse`"]
lemma prod_reverse_noncomm : ∀ (L : list α), L.reverse.prod = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod⁻¹ :=
by simp [prod_inv_reverse]
end group
section comm_group
variables [comm_group α]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg`"]
lemma prod_inv : ∀ (L : list α), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [mul_comm, prod_inv xs]
end comm_group
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_add_sum_drop [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).sum + (L.drop i).sum = L.sum
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, add_assoc, sum_take_add_sum_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_succ [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L.take i).sum + L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, sum_take_succ, add_assoc], }
lemma eq_of_sum_take_eq [add_left_cancel_monoid α] {L L' : list α} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).sum = (L'.take i).sum) : L = L' :=
begin
apply ext_le h (λ i h₁ h₂, _),
have : (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L'.take (i + 1)).sum := h' _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁),
rw [sum_take_succ L i h₁, sum_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this,
exact add_left_cancel this
end
lemma monotone_sum_take [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (L : list α) :
monotone (λ i, (L.take i).sum) :=
begin
apply monotone_of_monotone_nat (λ n, _),
by_cases h : n < L.length,
{ rw sum_take_succ _ _ h,
exact le_add_right (le_refl _) },
{ push_neg at h,
simp [take_all_of_le h, take_all_of_le (le_trans h (nat.le_succ _))] }
end
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le [ordered_comm_monoid α] {l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) :
1 ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih,
{ simp },
rw prod_cons,
exact one_le_mul (hl₁ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)) (ih (λ x h, hl₁ x (mem_cons_of_mem hd h))),
end
@[to_additive]
lemma single_le_prod [ordered_comm_monoid α] {l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) :
∀ x ∈ l, x ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
simp_rw [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at ⊢ hl₁,
split,
{ exact le_mul_of_one_le_right' (one_le_prod_of_one_le hl₁.2) },
{ exact λ x H, le_mul_of_one_le_of_le hl₁.1 (l_ih hl₁.right x H) },
end
@[to_additive all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero]
lemma all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one [ordered_comm_monoid α]
{l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) (hl₂ : l.prod = 1) :
∀ x ∈ l, x = (1 : α) :=
λ x hx, le_antisymm (hl₂ ▸ single_le_prod hl₁ _ hx) (hl₁ x hx)
lemma sum_eq_zero_iff [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (l : list α) :
l.sum = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, x = (0 : α) :=
⟨all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero (λ _ _, zero_le _),
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
{ intro h,
rw [sum_cons, add_eq_zero_iff],
rw forall_mem_cons at h,
exact ⟨h.1, l_ih h.2⟩ },
end⟩
/-- A list with sum not zero must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero [add_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : L.sum ≠ 0) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
/-- If all elements in a list are bounded below by `1`, then the length of the list is bounded
by the sum of the elements. -/
lemma length_le_sum_of_one_le (L : list ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ L, 1 ≤ i) : L.length ≤ L.sum :=
begin
induction L with j L IH h, { simp },
rw [sum_cons, length, add_comm],
exact add_le_add (h _ (set.mem_insert _ _)) (IH (λ i hi, h i (set.mem_union_right _ hi)))
end
-- Now we tie those lemmas back to their multiplicative versions.
attribute [to_additive] prod_take_mul_prod_drop prod_take_succ length_pos_of_prod_ne_one
/-- A list with positive sum must have positive length. -/
-- This is an easy consequence of `length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero`, but often useful in applications.
lemma length_pos_of_sum_pos [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : 0 < L.sum) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero L (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_erase [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] {a} :
Π {l : list α}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b::l) h :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h with rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
lemma dvd_prod [comm_monoid α] {a} {l : list α} (ha : a ∈ l) : a ∣ l.prod :=
let ⟨s, t, h⟩ := mem_split ha in
by rw [h, prod_append, prod_cons, mul_left_comm]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, a ∣ x) : a ∣ l.sum :=
begin
induction l with x l ih,
{ exact dvd_zero _ },
{ rw [list.sum_cons],
exact dvd_add (h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih (λ x hx, h x (mem_cons_of_mem _ hx))) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
lemma exists_lt_of_sum_lt [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum < (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x < g x :=
begin
induction l with x l,
{ exfalso, exact lt_irrefl _ h },
{ by_cases h' : f x < g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases l_ih _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩, refine ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_lt_of_le h $ add_le_add_right (le_of_not_gt h') _) }
end
lemma exists_le_of_sum_le [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(hl : l ≠ []) (f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum ≤ (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ contradiction },
{ by_cases h' : f x ≤ g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases exists_lt_of_sum_lt f g _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩,
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, le_of_lt h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_le_of_lt h $ add_lt_add_right (lt_of_not_ge h') _) }
end
-- Several lemmas about sum/head/tail for `list ℕ`.
-- These are hard to generalize well, as they rely on the fact that `default ℕ = 0`.
-- We'd like to state this as `L.head * L.tail.prod = L.prod`,
-- but because `L.head` relies on an inhabited instances and
-- returns a garbage value for the empty list, this is not possible.
-- Instead we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1`,
-- and below, restate the lemma just for `ℕ`.
@[to_additive]
lemma head_mul_tail_prod' [monoid α] (L : list α) :
(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1 * L.tail.prod = L.prod :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_add_tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_le_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head ≤ L.sum :=
nat.le.intro (head_add_tail_sum L)
lemma tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.tail.sum = L.sum - L.head :=
by rw [← head_add_tail_sum L, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel]
section
variables {G : Type*} [comm_group G]
attribute [to_additive] alternating_prod
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_nil :
alternating_prod ([] : list G) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_singleton (g : G) :
alternating_prod [g] = g := rfl
@[simp, to_additive alternating_sum_cons_cons']
lemma alternating_prod_cons_cons (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_prod (g :: h :: l) = g * h⁻¹ * alternating_prod l := rfl
lemma alternating_sum_cons_cons {G : Type*} [add_comm_group G] (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_sum (g :: h :: l) = g - h + alternating_sum l :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, alternating_sum]
end
/-! ### join -/
attribute [simp] join
@[simp] theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l::L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
@[simp] theorem join_filter_empty_eq_ff [decidable_pred (λ l : list α, l.empty = ff)] :
∀ {L : list (list α)}, join (L.filter (λ l, l.empty = ff)) = L.join
| [] := rfl
| ([]::L) := by simp [@join_filter_empty_eq_ff L]
| ((a::l)::L) := by simp [@join_filter_empty_eq_ff L]
@[simp] theorem join_filter_ne_nil [decidable_pred (λ l : list α, l ≠ [])] {L : list (list α)} :
join (L.filter (λ l, l ≠ [])) = L.join :=
by simp [join_filter_empty_eq_ff, ← empty_iff_eq_nil]
lemma join_join (l : list (list (list α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join :=
by { induction l, simp, simp [l_ih] }
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma take_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.take i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [take_append, L_ih]
end
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma drop_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.drop i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [drop_append, L_ih],
end
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le (L : list α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i+1)).drop i = [nth_le L i hi] :=
begin
induction L generalizing i,
{ simp only [length] at hi, exact (nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim },
cases i, { simp },
have : i < L_tl.length,
{ simp at hi,
exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi },
simp [L_ih this],
refl
end
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lenghts of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le (L : list (list α)) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.join.take ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum).drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = nth_le L i hi :=
begin
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i+1)).map length).take i, by simp [map_take, take_take],
simp [take_sum_join, this, drop_sum_join, drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le _ hi]
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt1 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum :=
by simp [hi, sum_take_succ, hj]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt2 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < L.join.length :=
begin
convert lt_of_lt_of_le (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj) (monotone_sum_take _ hi),
have : L.length = (L.map length).length, by simp,
simp [this, -length_map]
end
/-- The `n`-th element in a join of sublists is the `j`-th element of the `i`th sublist,
where `n` can be obtained in terms of `i` and `j` by adding the lengths of all the sublists
of index `< i`, and adding `j`. -/
lemma nth_le_join (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
nth_le L.join (((L.map length).take i).sum + j) (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) =
nth_le (nth_le L i hi) j hj :=
by rw [nth_le_take L.join (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj),
nth_le_drop, nth_le_of_eq (drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le L hi)]
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : list (list α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by simp [H], _⟩,
rintros ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩,
apply ext_le,
{ have : length (map length L) = length (map length L'), by rw length_eq,
simpa using this },
{ assume n h₁ h₂,
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, join_eq, length_eq] }
end
/-! ### lexicographic ordering -/
/-- Given a strict order `<` on `α`, the lexicographic strict order on `list α`, for which
`[a0, ..., an] < [b0, ..., b_k]` if `a0 < b0` or `a0 = b0` and `[a1, ..., an] < [b1, ..., bk]`.
The definition is given for any relation `r`, not only strict orders. -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
@[simp] theorem not_nil_right (r : α → α → Prop) (l : list α) : ¬ lex r l [].
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
/-! ### all & any -/
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
simp only [all_cons, band_coe_iff, ih, forall_mem_cons]
end
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [all_iff_forall, bool.of_to_bool_iff]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_false bool.not_ff (not_exists_mem_nil _) },
simp only [any_cons, bor_coe_iff, ih, exists_mem_cons_iff]
end
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
@[priority 500] instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem [has_sizeof α] {x : α} {l : list α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
sizeof x < sizeof l :=
begin
induction l with h t ih; cases hx,
{ rw hx, exact lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg (lt_one_add _) (nat.zero_le _) },
{ exact lt_add_of_pos_of_le (zero_lt_one_add _) (le_of_lt (ih hx)) }
end
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl, rw [pmap, pmap, h, ih]]
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (g : ∀ b, p b → γ) (f : α → β)
(l H) : pmap g (map f l) H = pmap (λ a h, g (f a) h) l (λ a h, H _ (mem_map_of_mem _ h)) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, subtype.exists]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, length]]
@[simp] lemma length_attach (L : list α) : L.attach.length = L.length := length_pmap
@[simp] lemma pmap_eq_nil {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : pmap f l H = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by rw [← length_eq_zero, length_pmap, length_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma attach_eq_nil (l : list α) : l.attach = [] ↔ l = [] := pmap_eq_nil
lemma last_pmap {α β : Type*} (p : α → Prop) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l : list α) (hl₁ : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (hl₂ : l ≠ []) :
(l.pmap f hl₁).last (mt list.pmap_eq_nil.1 hl₂) = f (l.last hl₂) (hl₁ _ (list.last_mem hl₂)) :=
begin
induction l with l_hd l_tl l_ih,
{ apply (hl₂ rfl).elim },
{ cases l_tl,
{ simp },
{ apply l_ih } }
end
lemma nth_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) {l : list α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (n : ℕ) :
nth (pmap f l h) n = option.pmap f (nth l n) (λ x H, h x (nth_mem H)) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp },
{ cases n; simp [hl] }
end
lemma nth_le_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) {l : list α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
nth_le (pmap f l h) n hn = f (nth_le l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))
(h _ (nth_le_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp only [length, pmap] at hn,
exact absurd hn (not_lt_of_le n.zero_le) },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simpa [hl] } }
end
/-! ### find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases h : p a,
{ simp only [find_cons_of_pos _ h, h, not_true, false_and] },
{ rwa [find_cons_of_neg _ h, iff_true_intro h, true_and] }
end
theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, exact h },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, apply mem_cons_self },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-! ### lookmap -/
section lookmap
variables (f : α → option α)
@[simp] theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := rfl
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap (λ _, none) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → option α} :
∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [] H := rfl
| (a::l) H := begin
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
cases h : g a with b,
{ simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)] }
end
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), g a = g b) :
∀ l : list α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin
cases h' : f a with b,
{ simp [h', lookmap_map_eq] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h'] }
end
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), a = b) (l : list α) : l.lookmap f = l :=
by rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
theorem length_lookmap (l : list α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l :=
by rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ (λ _, ()), length_map]; simp
end lookmap
/-! ### filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]; split; refl
lemma filter_map_append {α β : Type*} (l l' : list α) (f : α → option β) :
filter_map f (l ++ l') = filter_map f l ++ filter_map f l' :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ rw [cons_append, filter_map, filter_map],
cases f hd;
simp only [filter_map, hl, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, and_self] }
end
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
simp only [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH, map_cons], split; refl
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
by_cases pa : p a,
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_pos pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ pa], split; refl },
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_neg pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ pa] }
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp only [h, option.none_bind'] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp only [h, h', option.some_bind']
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases h : p x,
{ simp only [option.guard, if_pos h, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [option.guard, if_neg h, option.none_bind'] }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ split, { intro H, cases H }, { rintro ⟨_, H, _⟩, cases H } },
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp only [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left, this, false_or] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp only [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this, exists_eq_left] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp only [map_filter_map, H, filter_map_some]
theorem sublist.filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp only [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp only [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_map f ▸ s.filter_map _
/-! ### reduce_option -/
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_cons_of_some (x : α) (l : list (option α)) :
reduce_option (some x :: l) = x :: l.reduce_option :=
by simp only [reduce_option, filter_map, id.def, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_cons_of_none (l : list (option α)) :
reduce_option (none :: l) = l.reduce_option :=
by simp only [reduce_option, filter_map, id.def]
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_nil : @reduce_option α [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_map {l : list (option α)} {f : α → β} :
reduce_option (map (option.map f) l) = map f (reduce_option l) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [reduce_option_nil, map_nil] },
{ cases hd;
simpa only [true_and, option.map_some', map, eq_self_iff_true,
reduce_option_cons_of_some] using hl },
end
lemma reduce_option_append (l l' : list (option α)) :
(l ++ l').reduce_option = l.reduce_option ++ l'.reduce_option :=
filter_map_append l l' id
lemma reduce_option_length_le (l : list (option α)) :
l.reduce_option.length ≤ l.length :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [reduce_option_nil, length] },
{ cases hd,
{ exact nat.le_succ_of_le hl },
{ simpa only [length, add_le_add_iff_right, reduce_option_cons_of_some] using hl} }
end
lemma reduce_option_length_eq_iff {l : list (option α)} :
l.reduce_option.length = l.length ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, option.is_some x :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [forall_const, reduce_option_nil, not_mem_nil,
forall_prop_of_false, eq_self_iff_true, length, not_false_iff] },
{ cases hd,
{ simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, bool.coe_sort_ff, false_and,
reduce_option_cons_of_none, length, option.is_some_none, iff_false],
intro H,
have := reduce_option_length_le tl,
rw H at this,
exact absurd (nat.lt_succ_self _) (not_lt_of_le this) },
{ simp only [hl, true_and, mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, add_left_inj,
bool.coe_sort_tt, length, option.is_some_some, reduce_option_cons_of_some] } }
end
lemma reduce_option_length_lt_iff {l : list (option α)} :
l.reduce_option.length < l.length ↔ none ∈ l :=
begin
convert not_iff_not.mpr reduce_option_length_eq_iff;
simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, reduce_option_length_le l, option.is_none_iff_eq_none]
end
lemma reduce_option_singleton (x : option α) :
[x].reduce_option = x.to_list :=
by cases x; refl
lemma reduce_option_concat (l : list (option α)) (x : option α) :
(l.concat x).reduce_option = l.reduce_option ++ x.to_list :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing x,
{ cases x;
simp [option.to_list] },
{ simp only [concat_eq_append, reduce_option_append] at hl,
cases hd;
simp [hl, reduce_option_append] }
end
lemma reduce_option_concat_of_some (l : list (option α)) (x : α) :
(l.concat (some x)).reduce_option = l.reduce_option.concat x :=
by simp only [reduce_option_nil, concat_eq_append, reduce_option_append, reduce_option_cons_of_some]
lemma reduce_option_mem_iff {l : list (option α)} {x : α} :
x ∈ l.reduce_option ↔ (some x) ∈ l :=
by simp only [reduce_option, id.def, mem_filter_map, exists_eq_right]
lemma reduce_option_nth_iff {l : list (option α)} {x : α} :
(∃ i, l.nth i = some (some x)) ↔ ∃ i, l.reduce_option.nth i = some x :=
by rw [←mem_iff_nth, ←mem_iff_nth, reduce_option_mem_iff]
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p l = foldr (λ a out, if p a then a :: out else out) [] l :=
by induction l; simp [*, filter]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw forall_mem_cons at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h.1.1 pa), filter_congr h.2],
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ (mt h.1.2 pa), filter_congr h.2]];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
(filter_sublist l).subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, by simpa only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb] using ain,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| (_::l) (or.inl rfl) pa := by rw filter_cons_of_pos _ pa; apply mem_cons_self
| (b::l) (or.inr ain) pa := if pb : p b
then by rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; apply mem_cons_of_mem; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
else by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb]; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_inj, ih, and_iff_right h] },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
refine iff_of_false _ (mt and.left h), intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _) }
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
variable (p)
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_filter p ▸ s.filter_map _
theorem map_filter (f : β → α) (l : list β) :
filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_filter (q) [decidable_pred q] : ∀ l,
filter p (filter q l) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := by by_cases hp : p a; by_cases hq : q a; simp only [hp, hq, filter, if_true, if_false,
true_and, false_and, filter_filter l, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma filter_true {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, true)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, true) h l = l :=
by convert filter_eq_self.2 (λ _ _, trivial)
@[simp] lemma filter_false {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, false)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, false) h l = [] :=
by convert filter_eq_nil.2 (λ _ _, id)
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop : ∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) :=
if pa : p a then by simp only [span, if_pos pa, span_eq_take_drop l, take_while, drop_while]
else by simp only [span, take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop : ∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_pos pa, if_pos pa, cons_append,
take_while_append_drop l]
else by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa, if_neg pa, nil_append]
@[simp] theorem countp_nil : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l ih; [refl, by_cases (p x)];
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, countp, ih, if_pos h],
simp only [countp_cons_of_neg _ _ h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg _ h]]; refl
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa only [countp_eq_length_filter] using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter p s)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (l : list α) :
countp p (filter q l) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
end filter
/-! ### count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_tail : Π (l : list α) (a : α) (h : 0 < l.length),
l.tail.count a = l.count a - ite (a = list.nth_le l 0 h) 1 0
| (_ :: _) a h := by { rw [count_cons], split_ifs; simp }
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist _
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append _
theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by simp [-add_comm]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp only [count, countp_pos, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
decidable.by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp only [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa only [count_repeat] using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
theorem repeat_count_eq_of_count_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = length l) :
repeat a (count a l) = l :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq (le_count_iff_repeat_sublist.mp (le_refl (count a l)))
(eq.trans (length_repeat a (count a l)) h)
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {l : list α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p l) = count a l :=
by simp only [count, countp_filter]; congr; exact
set.ext (λ b, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ e, e ▸ h))
end count
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) :=
by rw ← list.append_assoc; apply infix_append
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp only [h, append_nil]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp only [reverse_reverse]
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_infix_nil {l : list α} : l <:+: [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_infix_nil, λ h, h ▸ infix_refl _⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_prefix_nil {l : list α} : l <+: [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_prefix_nil, λ h, h ▸ prefix_refl _⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_suffix_nil {l : list α} : l <:+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_suffix_nil, λ h, h ▸ suffix_refl _⟩
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem suffix_cons_iff {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <:+ x :: l₂ ↔ l₁ = x :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, hl₃⟩,
{ exact or.inl hl₃ },
{ simp only [cons_append] at hl₃,
exact or.inr ⟨_, hl₃.2⟩ } },
{ rintro (rfl | hl₁),
{ exact (x :: l₂).suffix_refl },
{ exact hl₁.trans (l₂.suffix_cons _) } }
end
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_right_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem tail_suffix (l : list α) : tail l <:+ l := by rw ← drop_one; apply drop_suffix
lemma tail_sublist (l : list α) : l.tail <+ l := sublist_of_suffix (tail_suffix l)
theorem tail_subset (l : list α) : tail l ⊆ l := (tail_sublist l).subset
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; rw drop_left, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp only [length_append, nat.add_sub_cancel, take_left], λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
lemma prefix_take_le_iff {L : list (list (option α))} {m n : ℕ} (hm : m < L.length) :
(take m L) <+: (take n L) ↔ m ≤ n :=
begin
simp only [prefix_iff_eq_take, length_take],
induction m with m IH generalizing L n,
{ simp only [min_eq_left, eq_self_iff_true, nat.zero_le, take] },
{ cases n,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, take, take_nil],
split,
{ cases L,
{ exact absurd hm (not_lt_of_le m.succ.zero_le) },
{ simp only [forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff, take] } },
{ intro h,
contradiction } },
{ cases L with l ls,
{ exact absurd hm (not_lt_of_le m.succ.zero_le) },
{ simp only [length] at hm,
specialize @IH ls n (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm),
simp only [le_of_lt (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm), min_eq_left] at IH,
simp only [le_of_lt hm, IH, true_and, min_eq_left, eq_self_iff_true, length, take],
exact ⟨nat.succ_le_succ, nat.le_of_succ_le_succ⟩ } } },
end
lemma cons_prefix_iff {l l' : list α} {x y : α} :
x :: l <+: y :: l' ↔ x = y ∧ l <+: l' :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨L, hL⟩,
simp only [cons_append] at hL,
exact ⟨hL.left, ⟨L, hL.right⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨rfl, h⟩,
rwa [prefix_cons_inj] },
end
lemma map_prefix {l l' : list α} (f : α → β) (h : l <+: l') :
l.map f <+: l'.map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp only [nil_prefix, map_nil] },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simpa only using eq_nil_of_prefix_nil h },
{ rw cons_prefix_iff at h,
simp only [h, prefix_cons_inj, hl, map] } },
end
lemma is_prefix.filter_map {l l' : list α} (h : l <+: l') (f : α → option β) :
l.filter_map f <+: l'.filter_map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp only [nil_prefix, filter_map_nil] },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simpa only using eq_nil_of_prefix_nil h },
{ rw cons_prefix_iff at h,
rw [←@singleton_append _ hd _, ←@singleton_append _ hd' _, filter_map_append,
filter_map_append, h.left, prefix_append_right_inj],
exact hl h.right } },
end
lemma is_prefix.reduce_option {l l' : list (option α)} (h : l <+: l') :
l.reduce_option <+: l'.reduce_option :=
h.filter_map id
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa only [inits, mem_singleton],
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp only [tails, mem_singleton];
exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp only [tails, mem_cons_iff, mem_tails s t];
exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
lemma inits_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : inits (a :: l) = [] :: l.inits.map (λ t, a :: t) :=
by simp
lemma tails_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tails (a :: l) = (a :: l) :: l.tails :=
by simp
@[simp]
lemma inits_append : ∀ (s t : list α), inits (s ++ t) = s.inits ++ t.inits.tail.map (λ l, s ++ l)
| [] [] := by simp
| [] (a::t) := by simp
| (a::s) t := by simp [inits_append s t]
@[simp]
lemma tails_append : ∀ (s t : list α), tails (s ++ t) = s.tails.map (λ l, l ++ t) ++ t.tails.tail
| [] [] := by simp
| [] (a::t) := by simp
| (a::s) t := by simp [tails_append s t]
-- the lemma names `inits_eq_tails` and `tails_eq_inits` are like `sublists_eq_sublists'`
lemma inits_eq_tails :
∀ (l : list α), l.inits = (reverse $ map reverse $ tails $ reverse l)
| [] := by simp
| (a :: l) := by simp [inits_eq_tails l, map_eq_map_iff]
lemma tails_eq_inits :
∀ (l : list α), l.tails = (reverse $ map reverse $ inits $ reverse l)
| [] := by simp
| (a :: l) := by simp [tails_eq_inits l, append_left_inj]
lemma inits_reverse (l : list α) : inits (reverse l) = reverse (map reverse l.tails) :=
by { rw tails_eq_inits l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma tails_reverse (l : list α) : tails (reverse l) = reverse (map reverse l.inits) :=
by { rw inits_eq_tails l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma map_reverse_inits (l : list α) : map reverse l.inits = (reverse $ tails $ reverse l) :=
by { rw inits_eq_tails l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma map_reverse_tails (l : list α) : map reverse l.tails = (reverse $ inits $ reverse l) :=
by { rw tails_eq_inits l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp only [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists', map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s,
{ simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map],
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ h },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl h },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l, length_map,
length, pow_succ', mul_succ, mul_zero, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp only [*, append_assoc]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp only [sublists_aux, foldr_cons], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr' 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih, {refl},
simp only [ih, foldr_cons]
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, nil_append, append_nil]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, cons_append, sublists_aux₁_append l₁, append_assoc];
refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp only [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁, append_assoc, append_nil]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := rfl
| (a::l) f g := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, bind_append, sublists_aux₁_bind l]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp only [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux₁_append, bind_eq_bind,
sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, apply congr_arg _,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], exact (append_nil _).symm
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp only [map, sublists, sublists_aux_cons_append, map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind,
cons_bind, map_id', append_nil, cons_append, map_id' (λ _, rfl)]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_bind, cons_bind, cons_bind, nil_bind,
map_eq_map, map_eq_map, map_id' (append_nil), append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [refl,
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind, map_map, cons_bind, append_nil, nil_bind, (∘)]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id' (reverse_reverse)]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro, {rwa foldr},
simp only [foldr, mem_cons_iff, false_or, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_injective reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2 $ singleton_sublist.2 $
mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by refl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
/-! ### sublists_len -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
of `f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublists_len_aux {α β : Type*} : ℕ → list α → (list α → β) → list β → list β
| 0 l f r := f [] :: r
| (n+1) [] f r := r
| (n+1) (a::l) f r := sublists_len_aux (n + 1) l f
(sublists_len_aux n l (f ∘ list.cons a) r)
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
`l = [0, 1, 2, 3]` and `n = 2`, one gets
`[[2, 3], [1, 3], [1, 2], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1]]`. -/
def sublists_len {α : Type*} (n : ℕ) (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists_len_aux n l id []
lemma sublists_len_aux_append {α β γ : Type*} :
∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (g : β → γ) (r : list β) (s : list γ),
sublists_len_aux n l (g ∘ f) (r.map g ++ s) =
(sublists_len_aux n l f r).map g ++ s
| 0 l f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) [] f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) f g r s := begin
unfold sublists_len_aux,
rw [show ((g ∘ f) ∘ list.cons a) = (g ∘ f ∘ list.cons a), by refl,
sublists_len_aux_append, sublists_len_aux_append]
end
lemma sublists_len_aux_eq {α β : Type*} (l : list α) (n) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux n l f r = (sublists_len n l).map f ++ r :=
by rw [sublists_len, ← sublists_len_aux_append]; refl
lemma sublists_len_aux_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux 0 l f r = f [] :: r := by cases l; refl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) :
sublists_len 0 l = [[]] := sublists_len_aux_zero _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_nil {α : Type*} (n) :
sublists_len (n+1) (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_cons {α : Type*} (n) (a : α) (l) :
sublists_len (n + 1) (a::l) =
sublists_len (n + 1) l ++ (sublists_len n l).map (cons a) :=
by rw [sublists_len, sublists_len_aux, sublists_len_aux_eq,
sublists_len_aux_eq, map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] lemma length_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
length (sublists_len n l) = nat.choose (length l) n
| 0 l := by simp
| (n+1) [] := by simp
| (n+1) (a::l) := by simp [-add_comm, nat.choose, *]; apply add_comm
lemma sublists_len_sublist_sublists' {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
sublists_len n l <+ sublists' l
| 0 l := singleton_sublist.2 (mem_sublists'.2 (nil_sublist _))
| (n+1) [] := nil_sublist _
| (n+1) (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, sublists'_cons],
exact (sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).append
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).map _)
end
lemma sublists_len_sublist_of_sublist
{α : Type*} (n) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : sublists_len n l₁ <+ sublists_len n l₂ :=
begin
induction n with n IHn generalizing l₁ l₂, {simp},
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH, {refl},
{ refine IH.trans _,
rw sublists_len_succ_cons,
apply sublist_append_left },
{ simp [sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact IH.append ((IHn s).map _) }
end
lemma length_of_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ {n} {l l' : list α},
l' ∈ sublists_len n l → length l' = n
| 0 l l' (or.inl rfl) := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) l' h := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, mem_append, mem_map] at h,
rcases h with h | ⟨l', h, rfl⟩,
{ exact length_of_sublists_len h },
{ exact congr_arg (+1) (length_of_sublists_len h) },
end
lemma mem_sublists_len_self {α : Type*} {l l' : list α}
(h : l' <+ l) : l' ∈ sublists_len (length l') l :=
begin
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ cases l₁ with b l₁,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_left _ IH } },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_right _ (mem_map.2 ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩) }
end
@[simp] lemma mem_sublists_len {α : Type*} {n} {l l' : list α} :
l' ∈ sublists_len n l ↔ l' <+ l ∧ length l' = n :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_sublists'.1
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).subset h),
length_of_sublists_len h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_sublists_len_self h₁⟩
/-! ### permutations -/
section permutations
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]; refl
end permutations
/-! ### insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_pos h]
@[simp, priority 970]
theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_neg h]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l,
{ simp only [insert_of_mem h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h' },
simp only [insert_of_not_mem h', mem_cons_iff]
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; [simp only [insert_of_mem h], simp only [insert_of_not_mem h, suffix_cons]]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by rw insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by rw insert_of_not_mem h; refl
end insert
/-! ### erasep -/
section erasep
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem erasep_nil : [].erasep p = [] := rfl
theorem erasep_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
(a :: l).erasep p = if p a then l else a :: l.erasep p := rfl
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : p a) : (a :: l).erasep p = l :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ p a) :
(a::l).erasep p = a :: l.erasep p :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
theorem erasep_of_forall_not {l : list α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) : l.erasep p = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [h _ (or.inl rfl), ih (forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_of_erasep {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {cases al},
by_cases pb : p b,
{ exact ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩ },
{ rcases al with rfl | al, {exact pb.elim pa},
rcases IH al with ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
exact ⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw h₃; refl, by simp [pb, h₄]⟩ }
end
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
l.erasep p = l ∨ ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, ha, pa⟩,
exact or.inr (exists_of_erasep ha pa) },
{ simp at h, exact or.inl (erasep_of_forall_not h) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_erasep_of_mem {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.erasep p) = pred (length l) :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep al pa with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩;
rw e₂; simp [-add_comm, e₁]; refl
theorem erasep_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁.erasep p ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : p x; simp [h'],
rw erasep_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (mt _ h') h),
rintro rfl, exact pa
end
theorem erasep_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂.erasep p
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1,
erasep_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem erasep_sublist (l : list α) : l.erasep p <+ l :=
by rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩;
[rw h, {rw [h₄, h₃], simp}]
theorem erasep_subset (l : list α) : l.erasep p ⊆ l :=
(erasep_sublist l).subset
theorem sublist.erasep {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erasep p <+ l₂.erasep p :=
begin
induction s,
case list.sublist.slnil { refl },
case list.sublist.cons : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [IH.trans (erasep_sublist _), IH.cons _ _ _] },
case list.sublist.cons2 : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [s, IH.cons2 _ _ _] }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_erasep {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erasep p → a ∈ l :=
@erasep_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erasep_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (pa : ¬ p a) : a ∈ l.erasep p ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erasep, λ al, begin
rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
{ rwa h },
{ rw h₄, rw h₃ at al,
have : a ≠ c, {rintro rfl, exact pa.elim h₂},
simpa [this] using al }
end⟩
theorem erasep_map (f : β → α) :
∀ (l : list β), (map f l).erasep p = map f (l.erasep (p ∘ f))
| [] := rfl
| (b::l) := by by_cases p (f b); simp [h, erasep_map l]
@[simp] theorem extractp_eq_find_erasep :
∀ l : list α, extractp p l = (find p l, erasep p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [extractp, pa, extractp_eq_find_erasep l]
end erasep
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
(b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]; split; refl
theorem erase_eq_erasep (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a = l.erasep (eq a) :=
by { induction l with b l, {refl},
by_cases a = b; [simp [h], simp [h, ne.symm h, *]] }
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erasep_of_forall_not]; rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep h rfl with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, rfl, h₂, h₃⟩;
rw erase_eq_erasep; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, λ h, h₁ _ h rfl, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact length_erasep_of_mem h rfl
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_append_left (by refl) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_append_right];
rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; apply erasep_sublist
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
(erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact sublist.erasep h
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact mem_erasep_of_neg ab.symm
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by rw ab else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α}
(l : list α) : map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_map]; congr;
ext b; simp [finj.eq_iff]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; [refl,
simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s a) = pred (count a s)
| [] := by simp
| (h :: t) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
by_cases p : h = a,
{ rw [if_pos p, count_cons', if_pos p.symm], simp },
{ rw [if_neg p, count_cons', count_cons', if_neg (λ x : a = h, p x.symm), count_erase_self],
simp, }
end
@[simp] theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s b) = count a s
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [count_cons', h, if_neg ab], simp },
{ rw [count_cons', count_cons', count_erase_of_ne] }
end
end erase
/-! ### diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp only [list.diff, if_pos h]
else by simp only [list.diff, if_neg h, erase_of_not_mem h]
lemma diff_cons_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.diff l₂).erase a :=
begin
induction l₂ with b l₂ ih generalizing l₁ a,
{ simp_rw [diff_cons, diff_nil] },
{ rw [diff_cons, diff_cons, erase_comm, ← diff_cons, ih, ← diff_cons] }
end
lemma diff_erase (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : (l₁.diff l₂).erase a = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
by rw [← diff_cons_right, diff_cons]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : list α) : [].diff l = [] :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, diff_cons, erase_of_not_mem (not_mem_nil _)]]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| l₁ [] := sublist.refl _
| l₁ (a::l₂) := calc l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ : diff_cons _ _ _
... <+ l₁.erase a : diff_sublist _ _
... <+ l₁ : list.erase_sublist _ _
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
(diff_sublist _ _).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] h₁ h₂ := h₁
| l₁ (b::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by rw diff_cons; exact
mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne (ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂)).2 h₁) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h₂)
theorem sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃: list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| l₁ l₂ [] h := h
| l₁ l₂ (a::l₃) h := by simp only
[diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α},
l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [] l₂ h := erase_sublist _ _
| (b::l₁) l₂ h := if heq : b = a then by simp only [heq, erase_cons_head, diff_cons]
else by simpa only [erase_cons_head, erase_cons_tail _ heq, diff_cons,
erase_comm a b l₂]
using erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist (h.erase b)
end diff
/-! ### enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_nth, zero_add]; intros; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
theorem mem_enum_from {x : α} {i : ℕ} :
∀ {j : ℕ} (xs : list α), (i, x) ∈ xs.enum_from j → j ≤ i ∧ i < j + xs.length ∧ x ∈ xs
| j [] := by simp [enum_from]
| j (y :: ys) :=
suffices i = j ∧ x = y ∨ (i, x) ∈ enum_from (j + 1) ys →
j ≤ i ∧ i < j + (length ys + 1) ∧ (x = y ∨ x ∈ ys),
by simpa [enum_from, mem_enum_from ys],
begin
rintro (h|h),
{ refine ⟨le_of_eq h.1.symm,h.1 ▸ _,or.inl h.2⟩,
apply nat.lt_add_of_pos_right; simp },
{ obtain ⟨hji, hijlen, hmem⟩ := mem_enum_from _ h,
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (nat.le_succ _) hji },
{ convert hijlen using 1, ac_refl },
{ simp [hmem] } }
end
/-! ### product -/
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp only [product, mem_bind, mem_map, prod.ext_iff, exists_prop,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [exact (zero_mul _).symm,
simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH,
right_distrib, one_mul, length_map, add_comm]]
/-! ### sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp only [list.sigma, mem_bind, mem_map, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left,
and.left_comm, exists_eq_left, heq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [refl,
simp only [map, sigma_cons, length_append, length_map, IH, sum_cons]]
end
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : list α) : disjoint l [] :=
by rw disjoint_comm; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_singleton, forall_eq]; refl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_take_drop {l : list α} {m n : ℕ} (hl : l.nodup) (h : m ≤ n) :
disjoint (l.take m) (l.drop n) :=
begin
induction l generalizing m n,
case list.nil : m n
{ simp },
case list.cons : x xs xs_ih m n
{ cases m; cases n; simp only [disjoint_cons_left, mem_cons_iff, disjoint_cons_right, drop,
true_or, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and,
disjoint_nil_left, take],
{ cases h },
cases hl with _ _ h₀ h₁, split,
{ intro h, exact h₀ _ (mem_of_mem_drop h) rfl, },
solve_by_elim [le_of_succ_le_succ] { max_depth := 4 } },
end
end disjoint
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [nil_union, not_mem_nil, false_or, cons_union, mem_insert_iff,
mem_cons_iff, or_assoc, *]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂
then ⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else ⟨a::t, cons_sublist_cons _ s, by simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h];
split; refl⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/-! ### inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter, not_and]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
@[simp] lemma inter_reverse {xs ys : list α} :
xs.inter ys.reverse = xs.inter ys :=
by simp only [list.inter, mem_reverse]; congr
end inter
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
/-! ### map₂_left' -/
section map₂_left'
-- The definitional equalities for `map₂_left'` can already be used by the
-- simplifie because `map₂_left'` is marked `@[simp]`.
@[simp] theorem map₂_left'_nil_right (f : α → option β → γ) (as) :
map₂_left' f as [] = (as.map (λ a, f a none), []) :=
by cases as; refl
end map₂_left'
/-! ### map₂_right' -/
section map₂_right'
variables (f : option α → β → γ) (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_left :
map₂_right' f [] bs = (bs.map (f none), []) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_right :
map₂_right' f as [] = ([], as) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_cons :
map₂_right' f [] (b :: bs) = (f none b :: bs.map (f none), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_cons_cons :
map₂_right' f (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := map₂_right' f as bs in
(f (some a) b :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end map₂_right'
/-! ### zip_left' -/
section zip_left'
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_nil_right :
zip_left' as ([] : list β) = (as.map (λ a, (a, none)), []) :=
by cases as; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_nil_left :
zip_left' ([] : list α) bs = ([], bs) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_cons_nil :
zip_left' (a :: as) ([] : list β) = ((a, none) :: as.map (λ a, (a, none)), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_cons_cons :
zip_left' (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := zip_left' as bs in
((a, some b) :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end zip_left'
/-! ### zip_right' -/
section zip_right'
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_left :
zip_right' ([] : list α) bs = (bs.map (λ b, (none, b)), []) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_right :
zip_right' as ([] : list β) = ([], as) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_cons :
zip_right' ([] : list α) (b :: bs) = ((none, b) :: bs.map (λ b, (none, b)), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_cons_cons :
zip_right' (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := zip_right' as bs in
((some a, b) :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end zip_right'
/-! ### map₂_left -/
section map₂_left
variables (f : α → option β → γ) (as : list α)
-- The definitional equalities for `map₂_left` can already be used by the
-- simplifier because `map₂_left` is marked `@[simp]`.
@[simp] theorem map₂_left_nil_right :
map₂_left f as [] = as.map (λ a, f a none) :=
by cases as; refl
theorem map₂_left_eq_map₂_left' : ∀ as bs,
map₂_left f as bs = (map₂_left' f as bs).fst
| [] bs := by simp!
| (a :: as) [] := by simp!
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) := by simp! [*]
theorem map₂_left_eq_map₂ : ∀ as bs,
length as ≤ length bs →
map₂_left f as bs = map₂ (λ a b, f a (some b)) as bs
| [] [] h := by simp!
| [] (b :: bs) h := by simp!
| (a :: as) [] h := by { simp at h, contradiction }
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) h := by { simp at h, simp! [*] }
end map₂_left
/-! ### map₂_right -/
section map₂_right
variables (f : option α → β → γ) (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_left :
map₂_right f [] bs = bs.map (f none) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_right :
map₂_right f as [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_cons :
map₂_right f [] (b :: bs) = f none b :: bs.map (f none) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_cons_cons :
map₂_right f (a :: as) (b :: bs) = f (some a) b :: map₂_right f as bs :=
rfl
theorem map₂_right_eq_map₂_right' :
map₂_right f as bs = (map₂_right' f as bs).fst :=
by simp only [map₂_right, map₂_right', map₂_left_eq_map₂_left']
theorem map₂_right_eq_map₂ (h : length bs ≤ length as) :
map₂_right f as bs = map₂ (λ a b, f (some a) b) as bs :=
begin
have : (λ a b, flip f a (some b)) = (flip (λ a b, f (some a) b)) := rfl,
simp only [map₂_right, map₂_left_eq_map₂, map₂_flip, *]
end
end map₂_right
/-! ### zip_left -/
section zip_left
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_left_nil_right :
zip_left as ([] : list β) = as.map (λ a, (a, none)) :=
by cases as; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_nil_left :
zip_left ([] : list α) bs = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_cons_nil :
zip_left (a :: as) ([] : list β) = (a, none) :: as.map (λ a, (a, none)) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_cons_cons :
zip_left (a :: as) (b :: bs) = (a, some b) :: zip_left as bs :=
rfl
theorem zip_left_eq_zip_left' :
zip_left as bs = (zip_left' as bs).fst :=
by simp only [zip_left, zip_left', map₂_left_eq_map₂_left']
end zip_left
/-! ### zip_right -/
section zip_right
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_left :
zip_right ([] : list α) bs = bs.map (λ b, (none, b)) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_right :
zip_right as ([] : list β) = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_cons :
zip_right ([] : list α) (b :: bs) = (none, b) :: bs.map (λ b, (none, b)) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_cons_cons :
zip_right (a :: as) (b :: bs) = (some a, b) :: zip_right as bs :=
rfl
theorem zip_right_eq_zip_right' :
zip_right as bs = (zip_right' as bs).fst :=
by simp only [zip_right, zip_right', map₂_right_eq_map₂_right']
end zip_right
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem ilast'_mem : ∀ a l, @ilast' α a l ∈ a :: l
| a [] := or.inl rfl
| a (b::l) := or.inr (ilast'_mem b l)
@[simp] lemma nth_le_attach (L : list α) (i) (H : i < L.attach.length) :
(L.attach.nth_le i H).1 = L.nth_le i (length_attach L ▸ H) :=
calc (L.attach.nth_le i H).1
= (L.attach.map subtype.val).nth_le i (by simpa using H) : by rw nth_le_map'
... = L.nth_le i _ : by congr; apply attach_map_val
end list
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.map_list_prod {α β : Type*} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β) (l : list α) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
(l.prod_hom f).symm
namespace list
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_hom {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (L : list α) (f : α → β) (g : β →* γ) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g ((L.map f).prod) :=
by {rw g.map_list_prod, exact congr_arg _ (map_map _ _ _).symm}
theorem sum_map_mul_left {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, r * f b)).sum = r * (L.map f).sum :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_left r
theorem sum_map_mul_right {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, f b * r)).sum = (L.map f).sum * r :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_right r
universes u v
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_swap {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (x : α) (y : β) (xs : list (α × β)) :
(y, x) ∈ map prod.swap xs ↔ (x, y) ∈ xs :=
begin
induction xs with x xs,
{ simp only [not_mem_nil, map_nil] },
{ cases x with a b,
simp only [mem_cons_iff, prod.mk.inj_iff, map, prod.swap_prod_mk, prod.exists, xs_ih],
tauto! },
end
lemma slice_eq {α} (xs : list α) (n m : ℕ) :
slice n m xs = xs.take n ++ xs.drop (n+m) :=
begin
induction n generalizing xs,
{ simp [slice] },
{ cases xs; simp [slice, *, nat.succ_add], }
end
lemma sizeof_slice_lt {α} [has_sizeof α] (i j : ℕ) (hj : 0 < j) (xs : list α) (hi : i < xs.length) :
sizeof (list.slice i j xs) < sizeof xs :=
begin
induction xs generalizing i j,
case list.nil : i j h
{ cases hi },
case list.cons : x xs xs_ih i j h
{ cases i; simp only [-slice_eq, list.slice],
{ cases j, cases h,
dsimp only [drop], unfold_wf,
apply @lt_of_le_of_lt _ _ _ xs.sizeof,
{ clear_except,
induction xs generalizing j; unfold_wf,
case list.nil : j
{ refl },
case list.cons : xs_hd xs_tl xs_ih j
{ cases j; unfold_wf, refl,
transitivity, apply xs_ih,
simp }, },
unfold_wf, apply zero_lt_one_add, },
{ unfold_wf, apply xs_ih _ _ h,
apply lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi, } },
end
end list
-/ |
4f53ce3e470c145ed9dfa5dd5c746af26d7e25ad | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/data/rat/basic.lean | 520e4e6214389c4a525ff62b57405094ccb86e4e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 31,819 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.euclidean_domain
import data.int.cast
import data.nat.gcd
import logic.encodable.basic
/-!
# Basics for the Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define a rational number `q` as a structure `{ num, denom, pos, cop }`, where
- `num` is the numerator of `q`,
- `denom` is the denominator of `q`,
- `pos` is a proof that `denom > 0`, and
- `cop` is a proof `num` and `denom` are coprime.
We then define the expected (discrete) field structure on `ℚ` and prove basic lemmas about it.
Moreoever, we provide the expected casts from `ℕ` and `ℤ` into `ℚ`, i.e. `(↑n : ℚ) = n / 1`.
## Main Definitions
- `rat` is the structure encoding `ℚ`.
- `rat.mk n d` constructs a rational number `q = n / d` from `n d : ℤ`.
## Notations
- `/.` is infix notation for `rat.mk`.
## Tags
rat, rationals, field, ℚ, numerator, denominator, num, denom
-/
/-- `rat`, or `ℚ`, is the type of rational numbers. It is defined
as the set of pairs ⟨n, d⟩ of integers such that `d` is positive and `n` and
`d` are coprime. This representation is preferred to the quotient
because without periodic reduction, the numerator and denominator can grow
exponentially (for example, adding 1/2 to itself repeatedly). -/
structure rat := mk' ::
(num : ℤ)
(denom : ℕ)
(pos : 0 < denom)
(cop : num.nat_abs.coprime denom)
notation `ℚ` := rat
namespace rat
/-- String representation of a rational numbers, used in `has_repr`, `has_to_string`, and
`has_to_format` instances. -/
protected def repr : ℚ → string
| ⟨n, d, _, _⟩ := if d = 1 then _root_.repr n else
_root_.repr n ++ "/" ++ _root_.repr d
instance : has_repr ℚ := ⟨rat.repr⟩
instance : has_to_string ℚ := ⟨rat.repr⟩
meta instance : has_to_format ℚ := ⟨coe ∘ rat.repr⟩
instance : encodable ℚ := encodable.of_equiv (Σ n : ℤ, {d : ℕ // 0 < d ∧ n.nat_abs.coprime d})
⟨λ ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, λ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, ⟨a, b, c, d⟩,
λ ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, rfl, λ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, rfl⟩
/-- Embed an integer as a rational number -/
def of_int (n : ℤ) : ℚ :=
⟨n, 1, nat.one_pos, nat.coprime_one_right _⟩
instance : has_zero ℚ := ⟨of_int 0⟩
instance : has_one ℚ := ⟨of_int 1⟩
instance : inhabited ℚ := ⟨0⟩
lemma ext_iff {p q : ℚ} : p = q ↔ p.num = q.num ∧ p.denom = q.denom :=
by { cases p, cases q, simp }
@[ext] lemma ext {p q : ℚ} (hn : p.num = q.num) (hd : p.denom = q.denom) : p = q :=
rat.ext_iff.mpr ⟨hn, hd⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n:ℤ` and `d:ℕ+` (not necessarily coprime) -/
def mk_pnat (n : ℤ) : ℕ+ → ℚ | ⟨d, dpos⟩ :=
let n' := n.nat_abs, g := n'.gcd d in
⟨n / g, d / g, begin
apply (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ (nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ dpos)).2,
rw one_mul, exact nat.le_of_dvd dpos (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
end, begin
have : int.nat_abs (n / ↑g) = n' / g,
{ cases int.nat_abs_eq n with e e; rw e, { refl },
rw [int.neg_div_of_dvd, int.nat_abs_neg], { refl },
exact int.coe_nat_dvd.2 (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) },
rw this,
exact nat.coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd (nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ dpos)
end⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n:ℤ` and `d:ℕ`. In the case `d = 0`, we
define `n / 0 = 0` by convention. -/
def mk_nat (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ) : ℚ :=
if d0 : d = 0 then 0 else mk_pnat n ⟨d, nat.pos_of_ne_zero d0⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n d : ℤ`. -/
def mk : ℤ → ℤ → ℚ
| n (d : ℕ) := mk_nat n d
| n -[1+ d] := mk_pnat (-n) d.succ_pnat
localized "infix ` /. `:70 := rat.mk" in rat
theorem mk_pnat_eq (n d h) : mk_pnat n ⟨d, h⟩ = n /. d :=
by change n /. d with dite _ _ _; simp [ne_of_gt h]
theorem mk_nat_eq (n d) : mk_nat n d = n /. d := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_zero (n) : n /. 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_mk_pnat (n) : mk_pnat 0 n = 0 :=
begin
cases n with n npos,
simp only [mk_pnat, int.nat_abs_zero, nat.div_self npos, nat.gcd_zero_left, int.zero_div],
refl
end
@[simp] theorem zero_mk_nat (n) : mk_nat 0 n = 0 :=
by by_cases n = 0; simp [*, mk_nat]
@[simp] theorem zero_mk (n) : 0 /. n = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [mk]
private lemma gcd_abs_dvd_left {a b} : (nat.gcd (int.nat_abs a) b : ℤ) ∣ a :=
int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $ nat.gcd_dvd_left (int.nat_abs a) b
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a /. b = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, by { rintro rfl, simp }⟩,
have : ∀ {a b}, mk_pnat a b = 0 → a = 0,
{ rintro a ⟨b, h⟩ e,
injection e with e,
apply int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right gcd_abs_dvd_left e },
cases b with b; simp only [mk, mk_nat, int.of_nat_eq_coe, dite_eq_left_iff] at h,
{ simp only [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) b0, not_false_iff, forall_true_left] at h,
exact this h },
{ apply neg_injective, simp [this h] }
end
theorem mk_ne_zero {a b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a /. b ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(mk_eq_zero b0).not
theorem mk_eq : ∀ {a b c d : ℤ} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0),
a /. b = c /. d ↔ a * d = c * b :=
suffices ∀ a b c d hb hd, mk_pnat a ⟨b, hb⟩ = mk_pnat c ⟨d, hd⟩ ↔ a * d = c * b,
begin
intros, cases b with b b; simp [mk, mk_nat, nat.succ_pnat],
simp [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) hb],
all_goals
{ cases d with d d; simp [mk, mk_nat, nat.succ_pnat],
simp [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) hd],
all_goals { rw this, try {refl} } },
{ change a * ↑(d.succ) = -c * ↑b ↔ a * -(d.succ) = c * b,
constructor; intro h; apply neg_injective; simpa [left_distrib, neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero] using h },
{ change -a * ↑d = c * b.succ ↔ a * d = c * -b.succ,
constructor; intro h; apply neg_injective; simpa [left_distrib, eq_comm] using h },
{ change -a * d.succ = -c * b.succ ↔ a * -d.succ = c * -b.succ,
simp [left_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg], cc }
end,
begin
intros, simp [mk_pnat], constructor; intro h,
{ cases h with ha hb,
have ha,
{ have dv := @gcd_abs_dvd_left,
have := int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right dv ha,
rw ← int.mul_div_assoc _ dv at this,
exact int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left (dv.mul_left _) this.symm },
have hb,
{ have dv := λ {a b}, nat.gcd_dvd_right (int.nat_abs a) b,
have := nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right dv hb,
rw ← nat.mul_div_assoc _ dv at this,
exact nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left (dv.mul_left _) this.symm },
have m0 : (a.nat_abs.gcd b * c.nat_abs.gcd d : ℤ) ≠ 0,
{ refine int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt _),
apply mul_pos; apply nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right; assumption },
apply mul_right_cancel₀ m0,
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using
congr (congr_arg (*) ha.symm) (congr_arg coe hb) },
{ suffices : ∀ a c, a * d = c * b →
a / a.gcd b = c / c.gcd d ∧ b / a.gcd b = d / c.gcd d,
{ cases this a.nat_abs c.nat_abs
(by simpa [int.nat_abs_mul] using congr_arg int.nat_abs h) with h₁ h₂,
have hs := congr_arg int.sign h,
simp [int.sign_eq_one_of_pos (int.coe_nat_lt.2 hb),
int.sign_eq_one_of_pos (int.coe_nat_lt.2 hd)] at hs,
conv in a { rw ← int.sign_mul_nat_abs a },
conv in c { rw ← int.sign_mul_nat_abs c },
rw [int.mul_div_assoc, int.mul_div_assoc],
exact ⟨congr (congr_arg (*) hs) (congr_arg coe h₁), h₂⟩,
all_goals { exact int.coe_nat_dvd.2 (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) } },
intros a c h,
suffices bd : b / a.gcd b = d / c.gcd d,
{ refine ⟨_, bd⟩,
apply nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left hb,
rw [← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _), mul_comm,
nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), bd,
← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), h, mul_comm,
nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _)] },
suffices : ∀ {a c : ℕ} (b>0) (d>0),
a * d = c * b → b / a.gcd b ≤ d / c.gcd d,
{ exact le_antisymm (this _ hb _ hd h) (this _ hd _ hb h.symm) },
intros a c b hb d hd h,
have gb0 := nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right a hb,
have gd0 := nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right c hd,
apply nat.le_of_dvd,
apply (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ gd0).2,
simp, apply nat.le_of_dvd hd (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _),
apply (nat.coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd gb0).symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left,
refine ⟨c / c.gcd d, _⟩,
rw [← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _),
← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)],
apply congr_arg (/ c.gcd d),
rw [mul_comm, ← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _),
mul_comm, h, nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), mul_comm] }
end
@[simp] theorem div_mk_div_cancel_left {a b c : ℤ} (c0 : c ≠ 0) :
(a * c) /. (b * c) = a /. b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp },
apply (mk_eq (mul_ne_zero b0 c0) b0).2, simp [mul_comm, mul_assoc]
end
@[simp] theorem num_denom : ∀ {a : ℚ}, a.num /. a.denom = a
| ⟨n, d, h, (c:_=1)⟩ := show mk_nat n d = _,
by simp [mk_nat, ne_of_gt h, mk_pnat, c]
theorem num_denom' {n d h c} : (⟨n, d, h, c⟩ : ℚ) = n /. d := num_denom.symm
theorem of_int_eq_mk (z : ℤ) : of_int z = z /. 1 := num_denom'
/-- Define a (dependent) function or prove `∀ r : ℚ, p r` by dealing with rational
numbers of the form `n /. d` with `0 < d` and coprime `n`, `d`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def {u} num_denom_cases_on {C : ℚ → Sort u}
: ∀ (a : ℚ) (H : ∀ n d, 0 < d → (int.nat_abs n).coprime d → C (n /. d)), C a
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ H := by rw num_denom'; exact H n d h c
/-- Define a (dependent) function or prove `∀ r : ℚ, p r` by dealing with rational
numbers of the form `n /. d` with `d ≠ 0`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def {u} num_denom_cases_on' {C : ℚ → Sort u}
(a : ℚ) (H : ∀ (n:ℤ) (d:ℕ), d ≠ 0 → C (n /. d)) : C a :=
num_denom_cases_on a $ λ n d h c, H n d h.ne'
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a :=
begin
cases e : a /. b with n d h c,
rw [rat.num_denom', rat.mk_eq b0
(ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_pos.2 h))] at e,
refine (int.nat_abs_dvd.1 $ int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right _),
have := congr_arg int.nat_abs e,
simp only [int.nat_abs_mul, int.nat_abs_of_nat] at this, simp [this]
end
theorem denom_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).denom : ℤ) ∣ b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp [b0]},
cases e : a /. b with n d h c,
rw [num_denom', mk_eq b0 (ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_pos.2 h))] at e,
refine (int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $ c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left _),
rw [← int.nat_abs_mul, ← int.coe_nat_dvd, int.dvd_nat_abs, ← e], simp
end
/-- Addition of rational numbers. Use `(+)` instead. -/
protected def add : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ := mk_pnat (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) ⟨d₁ * d₂, mul_pos h₁ h₂⟩
instance : has_add ℚ := ⟨rat.add⟩
theorem lift_binop_eq (f : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ) (f₁ : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ) (f₂ : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ)
(fv : ∀ {n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁ n₂ d₂ h₂ c₂},
f ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ = f₁ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ /. f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂)
(f0 : ∀ {n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂} (d₁0 : d₁ ≠ 0) (d₂0 : d₂ ≠ 0), f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ ≠ 0)
(a b c d : ℤ) (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0)
(H : ∀ {n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂} (h₁ : a * d₁ = n₁ * b) (h₂ : c * d₂ = n₂ * d),
f₁ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ * f₂ a b c d = f₁ a b c d * f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂) :
f (a /. b) (c /. d) = f₁ a b c d /. f₂ a b c d :=
begin
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁, rw num_denom' at ha,
generalize hc : c /. d = x, cases x with n₂ d₂ h₂ c₂, rw num_denom' at hc,
rw fv,
have d₁0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₁),
have d₂0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₂),
exact (mk_eq (f0 d₁0 d₂0) (f0 b0 d0)).2 (H ((mk_eq b0 d₁0).1 ha) ((mk_eq d0 d₂0).1 hc))
end
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
a /. b + c /. d = (a * d + c * b) /. (b * d) :=
begin
apply lift_binop_eq rat.add; intros; try {assumption},
{ apply mk_pnat_eq },
{ apply mul_ne_zero d₁0 d₂0 },
calc (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) * (b * d) =
(n₁ * b) * d₂ * d + (n₂ * d) * (d₁ * b) : by simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
... = (a * d₁) * d₂ * d + (c * d₂) * (d₁ * b) : by rw [h₁, h₂]
... = (a * d + c * b) * (d₁ * d₂) : by simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
end
/-- Negation of rational numbers. Use `-r` instead. -/
protected def neg (r : ℚ) : ℚ :=
⟨-r.num, r.denom, r.pos, by simp [r.cop]⟩
instance : has_neg ℚ := ⟨rat.neg⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_def {a b : ℤ} : -(a /. b) = -a /. b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp, refl },
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁, rw num_denom' at ha,
show rat.mk' _ _ _ _ = _, rw num_denom',
have d0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₁),
apply (mk_eq d0 b0).2, have h₁ := (mk_eq b0 d0).1 ha,
simp only [neg_mul, congr_arg has_neg.neg h₁]
end
@[simp] lemma mk_neg_denom (n d : ℤ) : n /. -d = -n /. d :=
begin
by_cases hd : d = 0;
simp [rat.mk_eq, hd]
end
/-- Multiplication of rational numbers. Use `(*)` instead. -/
protected def mul : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ := mk_pnat (n₁ * n₂) ⟨d₁ * d₂, mul_pos h₁ h₂⟩
instance : has_mul ℚ := ⟨rat.mul⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
(a /. b) * (c /. d) = (a * c) /. (b * d) :=
begin
apply lift_binop_eq rat.mul; intros; try {assumption},
{ apply mk_pnat_eq },
{ apply mul_ne_zero d₁0 d₂0 },
cc
end
/-- Inverse rational number. Use `r⁻¹` instead. -/
protected def inv : ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨(n+1:ℕ), d, h, c⟩ := ⟨d, n+1, n.succ_pos, c.symm⟩
| ⟨0, d, h, c⟩ := 0
| ⟨-[1+ n], d, h, c⟩ := ⟨-d, n+1, n.succ_pos, nat.coprime.symm $ by simp; exact c⟩
instance : has_inv ℚ := ⟨rat.inv⟩
@[simp] theorem inv_def {a b : ℤ} : (a /. b)⁻¹ = b /. a :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0, { subst a0, simp, refl },
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp, refl },
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n d h c, rw num_denom' at ha,
refine eq.trans (_ : rat.inv ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ = d /. n) _,
{ cases n with n; [cases n with n, skip],
{ refl },
{ change int.of_nat n.succ with (n+1:ℕ),
unfold rat.inv, rw num_denom' },
{ unfold rat.inv, rw num_denom', refl } },
have n0 : n ≠ 0,
{ rintro rfl,
rw [rat.zero_mk, mk_eq_zero b0] at ha,
exact a0 ha },
have d0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h),
have ha := (mk_eq b0 d0).1 ha,
apply (mk_eq n0 a0).2,
cc
end
variables (a b c : ℚ)
protected theorem add_zero : a + 0 = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by rw [← zero_mk d]; simp [h, -zero_mk]
protected theorem zero_add : 0 + a = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by rw [← zero_mk d]; simp [h, -zero_mk]
protected theorem add_comm : a + b = b + a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
by simp [h₁, h₂]; cc
protected theorem add_assoc : a + b + c = a + (b + c) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
protected theorem add_left_neg : -a + a = 0 :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by simp [h]
@[simp] lemma mk_zero_one : 0 /. 1 = 0 :=
show mk_pnat _ _ = _, by { rw mk_pnat, simp, refl }
@[simp] lemma mk_one_one : 1 /. 1 = 1 :=
show mk_pnat _ _ = _, by { rw mk_pnat, simp, refl }
@[simp] lemma mk_neg_one_one : (-1) /. 1 = -1 :=
show mk_pnat _ _ = _, by { rw mk_pnat, simp, refl }
protected theorem mul_one : a * 1 = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by { rw ← mk_one_one, simp [h, -mk_one_one] }
protected theorem one_mul : 1 * a = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by { rw ← mk_one_one, simp [h, -mk_one_one] }
protected theorem mul_comm : a * b = b * a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
by simp [h₁, h₂, mul_comm]
protected theorem mul_assoc : a * b * c = a * (b * c) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem add_mul : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero];
refine (div_mk_div_cancel_left (int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 h₃)).symm.trans _;
simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem mul_add : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
by rw [rat.mul_comm, rat.add_mul, rat.mul_comm, rat.mul_comm c a]
protected theorem zero_ne_one : 0 ≠ (1:ℚ) :=
by { rw [ne_comm, ← mk_one_one, mk_ne_zero one_ne_zero], exact one_ne_zero }
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel : a ≠ 0 → a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h a0,
have n0 : n ≠ 0, from mt (by { rintro rfl, simp }) a0,
by simpa [h, n0, mul_comm] using @div_mk_div_cancel_left 1 1 _ n0
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
eq.trans (rat.mul_comm _ _) (rat.mul_inv_cancel _ h)
instance : decidable_eq ℚ := by tactic.mk_dec_eq_instance
instance : field ℚ :=
{ zero := 0,
add := rat.add,
neg := rat.neg,
one := 1,
mul := rat.mul,
inv := rat.inv,
zero_add := rat.zero_add,
add_zero := rat.add_zero,
add_comm := rat.add_comm,
add_assoc := rat.add_assoc,
add_left_neg := rat.add_left_neg,
mul_one := rat.mul_one,
one_mul := rat.one_mul,
mul_comm := rat.mul_comm,
mul_assoc := rat.mul_assoc,
left_distrib := rat.mul_add,
right_distrib := rat.add_mul,
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, rat.zero_ne_one⟩,
mul_inv_cancel := rat.mul_inv_cancel,
inv_zero := rfl }
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance : division_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : is_domain ℚ := by apply_instance
-- TODO(Mario): this instance slows down data.real.basic
instance : nontrivial ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
--instance : ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_left_cancel_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_right_cancel_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
theorem sub_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
a /. b - c /. d = (a * d - c * b) /. (b * d) :=
by simp [b0, d0, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma denom_neg_eq_denom (q : ℚ) : (-q).denom = q.denom := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_neg_eq_neg_num (q : ℚ) : (-q).num = -(q.num) := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_zero : rat.num 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma denom_zero : rat.denom 0 = 1 := rfl
lemma zero_of_num_zero {q : ℚ} (hq : q.num = 0) : q = 0 :=
have q = q.num /. q.denom, from num_denom.symm,
by simpa [hq]
lemma zero_iff_num_zero {q : ℚ} : q = 0 ↔ q.num = 0 :=
⟨λ _, by simp *, zero_of_num_zero⟩
lemma num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} (h : q ≠ 0) : q.num ≠ 0 :=
assume : q.num = 0,
h $ zero_of_num_zero this
@[simp] lemma num_one : (1 : ℚ).num = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma denom_one : (1 : ℚ).denom = 1 := rfl
lemma denom_ne_zero (q : ℚ) : q.denom ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt q.pos
lemma eq_iff_mul_eq_mul {p q : ℚ} : p = q ↔ p.num * q.denom = q.num * p.denom :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [←(@num_denom p), ←(@num_denom q)] },
apply rat.mk_eq,
{ exact_mod_cast p.denom_ne_zero },
{ exact_mod_cast q.denom_ne_zero }
end
lemma mk_num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hqnd : q = n /. d) : n ≠ 0 :=
assume : n = 0,
hq $ by simpa [this] using hqnd
lemma mk_denom_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hqnd : q = n /. d) : d ≠ 0 :=
assume : d = 0,
hq $ by simpa [this] using hqnd
lemma mk_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {n d : ℤ} (h : n ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) : n /. d ≠ 0 :=
(mk_ne_zero hd).mpr h
lemma mul_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q * r = (q.num * r.num) /. ↑(q.denom * r.denom) :=
have hq' : (↑q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, by have := denom_ne_zero q; simpa,
have hr' : (↑r.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, by have := denom_ne_zero r; simpa,
suffices (q.num /. ↑q.denom) * (r.num /. ↑r.denom) = (q.num * r.num) /. ↑(q.denom * r.denom),
by simpa using this,
by simp [mul_def hq' hr', -num_denom]
lemma div_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q / r = (q.num * r.denom) /. (q.denom * r.num) :=
if hr : r.num = 0 then
have hr' : r = 0, from zero_of_num_zero hr,
by simp *
else
calc q / r = q * r⁻¹ : div_eq_mul_inv q r
... = (q.num /. q.denom) * (r.num /. r.denom)⁻¹ : by simp
... = (q.num /. q.denom) * (r.denom /. r.num) : by rw inv_def
... = (q.num * r.denom) /. (q.denom * r.num) : mul_def (by simpa using denom_ne_zero q) hr
lemma num_denom_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.denom :=
begin
obtain rfl|hn := eq_or_ne n 0,
{ simp [qdf] },
have : q.num * d = n * ↑(q.denom),
{ refine (rat.mk_eq _ hd).mp _,
{ exact int.coe_nat_ne_zero.mpr (rat.denom_ne_zero _) },
{ rwa [num_denom] } },
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n,
{ rw qdf, exact rat.num_dvd _ hd },
refine ⟨n / q.num, _, _⟩,
{ rw int.div_mul_cancel hqdn },
{ refine int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left _ hqdn this,
rw qdf,
exact rat.num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero ((mk_ne_zero hd).mpr hn) }
end
theorem mk_pnat_num (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ+) :
(mk_pnat n d).num = n / nat.gcd n.nat_abs d :=
by cases d; refl
theorem mk_pnat_denom (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ+) :
(mk_pnat n d).denom = d / nat.gcd n.nat_abs d :=
by cases d; refl
lemma num_mk (n d : ℤ) :
(n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d :=
begin
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _),
{ simp },
{ simpa [←int.coe_nat_succ, int.sign_coe_nat_of_nonzero] },
{ rw rat.mk,
simpa [rat.mk_pnat_num, int.neg_succ_of_nat_eq, ←int.coe_nat_succ,
int.sign_coe_nat_of_nonzero] }
end
lemma denom_mk (n d : ℤ) :
(n /. d).denom = if d = 0 then 1 else d.nat_abs / n.gcd d :=
begin
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _),
{ simp },
{ simpa [←int.coe_nat_succ, int.sign_coe_nat_of_nonzero] },
{ rw rat.mk,
simpa [rat.mk_pnat_denom, int.neg_succ_of_nat_eq, ←int.coe_nat_succ,
int.sign_coe_nat_of_nonzero] }
end
theorem mk_pnat_denom_dvd (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ+) :
(mk_pnat n d).denom ∣ d.1 :=
begin
rw mk_pnat_denom,
apply nat.div_dvd_of_dvd,
apply nat.gcd_dvd_right
end
theorem add_denom_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).denom ∣ q₁.denom * q₂.denom :=
by { cases q₁, cases q₂, apply mk_pnat_denom_dvd }
theorem mul_denom_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).denom ∣ q₁.denom * q₂.denom :=
by { cases q₁, cases q₂, apply mk_pnat_denom_dvd }
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).num =
(q₁.num * q₂.num) / nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).nat_abs (q₁.denom * q₂.denom) :=
by cases q₁; cases q₂; refl
theorem mul_denom (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).denom =
(q₁.denom * q₂.denom) / nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).nat_abs (q₁.denom * q₂.denom) :=
by cases q₁; cases q₂; refl
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num :=
by rw [mul_num, int.nat_abs_mul, nat.coprime.gcd_eq_one, int.coe_nat_one, int.div_one];
exact (q.cop.mul_right q.cop).mul (q.cop.mul_right q.cop)
theorem mul_self_denom (q : ℚ) : (q * q).denom = q.denom * q.denom :=
by rw [rat.mul_denom, int.nat_abs_mul, nat.coprime.gcd_eq_one, nat.div_one];
exact (q.cop.mul_right q.cop).mul (q.cop.mul_right q.cop)
lemma add_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q + r =
((q.num * r.denom + q.denom * r.num : ℤ)) /. (↑q.denom * ↑r.denom : ℤ) :=
have hqd : (q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.3,
have hrd : (r.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.3,
by conv_lhs { rw [←@num_denom q, ←@num_denom r, rat.add_def hqd hrd] };
simp [mul_comm]
section casts
protected lemma add_mk (a b c : ℤ) : (a + b) /. c = a /. c + b /. c :=
if h : c = 0 then by simp [h] else
by { rw [add_def h h, mk_eq h (mul_ne_zero h h)], simp [add_mul, mul_assoc] }
theorem coe_int_eq_mk : ∀ (z : ℤ), ↑z = z /. 1
| (n : ℕ) := show (n:ℚ) = n /. 1,
by induction n with n IH n; simp [*, rat.add_mk]
| -[1+ n] := show (-(n + 1) : ℚ) = -[1+ n] /. 1, begin
induction n with n IH, { rw ← of_int_eq_mk, simp, refl },
show -(n + 1 + 1 : ℚ) = -[1+ n.succ] /. 1,
rw [neg_add, IH, ← mk_neg_one_one],
simp [-mk_neg_one_one]
end
theorem mk_eq_div (n d : ℤ) : n /. d = ((n : ℚ) / d) :=
begin
by_cases d0 : d = 0, {simp [d0, div_zero]},
simp [division_def, coe_int_eq_mk, mul_def one_ne_zero d0]
end
@[simp]
theorem num_div_denom (r : ℚ) : (r.num / r.denom : ℚ) = r :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, ← mk_eq_div, num_denom]
lemma exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_denom (n : ℤ) {d : ℤ} (d_ne_zero : d ≠ 0) :
∃ (c : ℤ), n = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).num ∧ (d : ℤ) = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).denom :=
begin
have : ((n : ℚ) / d) = rat.mk n d, by rw [←rat.mk_eq_div],
exact rat.num_denom_mk d_ne_zero this
end
theorem coe_int_eq_of_int (z : ℤ) : ↑z = of_int z :=
(coe_int_eq_mk z).trans (of_int_eq_mk z).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_int_num (n : ℤ) : (n : ℚ).num = n :=
by rw coe_int_eq_of_int; refl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_int_denom (n : ℤ) : (n : ℚ).denom = 1 :=
by rw coe_int_eq_of_int; refl
lemma coe_int_num_of_denom_eq_one {q : ℚ} (hq : q.denom = 1) : ↑(q.num) = q :=
by { conv_rhs { rw [←(@num_denom q), hq] }, rw [coe_int_eq_mk], refl }
lemma denom_eq_one_iff (r : ℚ) : r.denom = 1 ↔ ↑r.num = r :=
⟨rat.coe_int_num_of_denom_eq_one, λ h, h ▸ rat.coe_int_denom r.num⟩
instance : can_lift ℚ ℤ :=
⟨coe, λ q, q.denom = 1, λ q hq, ⟨q.num, coe_int_num_of_denom_eq_one hq⟩⟩
theorem coe_nat_eq_mk (n : ℕ) : ↑n = n /. 1 :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_eq_mk]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_num (n : ℕ) : (n : ℚ).num = n :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_num]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_denom (n : ℕ) : (n : ℚ).denom = 1 :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_denom]
-- Will be subsumed by `int.coe_inj` after we have defined
-- `linear_ordered_field ℚ` (which implies characteristic zero).
lemma coe_int_inj (m n : ℤ) : (m : ℚ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using congr_arg num h, congr_arg _⟩
end casts
lemma inv_def' {q : ℚ} : q⁻¹ = (q.denom : ℚ) / q.num :=
by { conv_lhs { rw ←(@num_denom q) }, cases q, simp [div_num_denom] }
@[simp] lemma mul_denom_eq_num {q : ℚ} : q * q.denom = q.num :=
begin
suffices : mk (q.num) ↑(q.denom) * mk ↑(q.denom) 1 = mk (q.num) 1, by
{ conv { for q [1] { rw ←(@num_denom q) }}, rwa [coe_int_eq_mk, coe_nat_eq_mk] },
have : (q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from ne_of_gt (by exact_mod_cast q.pos),
rw [(rat.mul_def this one_ne_zero), (mul_comm (q.denom : ℤ) 1), (div_mk_div_cancel_left this)]
end
lemma denom_div_cast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℤ) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
((m : ℚ) / n).denom = 1 ↔ n ∣ m :=
begin
replace hn : (n:ℚ) ≠ 0, by rwa [ne.def, ← int.cast_zero, coe_int_inj],
split,
{ intro h,
lift ((m : ℚ) / n) to ℤ using h with k hk,
use k,
rwa [eq_div_iff_mul_eq hn, ← int.cast_mul, mul_comm, eq_comm, coe_int_inj] at hk },
{ rintros ⟨d, rfl⟩,
rw [int.cast_mul, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel _ hn, rat.coe_int_denom] }
end
lemma num_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : nat.coprime a.nat_abs b.nat_abs) :
(a / b : ℚ).num = a :=
begin
lift b to ℕ using le_of_lt hb0,
norm_cast at hb0 h,
rw [← rat.mk_eq_div, ← rat.mk_pnat_eq a b hb0, rat.mk_pnat_num, pnat.mk_coe, h.gcd_eq_one,
int.coe_nat_one, int.div_one]
end
lemma denom_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : nat.coprime a.nat_abs b.nat_abs) :
((a / b : ℚ).denom : ℤ) = b :=
begin
lift b to ℕ using le_of_lt hb0,
norm_cast at hb0 h,
rw [← rat.mk_eq_div, ← rat.mk_pnat_eq a b hb0, rat.mk_pnat_denom, pnat.mk_coe, h.gcd_eq_one,
nat.div_one]
end
lemma div_int_inj {a b c d : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (hd0 : 0 < d)
(h1 : nat.coprime a.nat_abs b.nat_abs) (h2 : nat.coprime c.nat_abs d.nat_abs)
(h : (a : ℚ) / b = (c : ℚ) / d) : a = c ∧ b = d :=
begin
apply and.intro,
{ rw [← (num_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1), h, num_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2] },
{ rw [← (denom_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1), h, denom_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2] }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_int_div_self (n : ℤ) : ((n / n : ℤ) : ℚ) = n / n :=
begin
by_cases hn : n = 0,
{ subst hn, simp only [int.cast_zero, euclidean_domain.zero_div] },
{ have : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0, { rwa ← coe_int_inj at hn },
simp only [int.div_self hn, int.cast_one, ne.def, not_false_iff, div_self this] }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_div_self (n : ℕ) : ((n / n : ℕ) : ℚ) = n / n :=
coe_int_div_self n
lemma coe_int_div (a b : ℤ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℤ) : ℚ) = a / b :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨c, rfl⟩,
simp only [mul_comm b, int.mul_div_assoc c (dvd_refl b), int.cast_mul, mul_div_assoc,
coe_int_div_self]
end
lemma coe_nat_div (a b : ℕ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℕ) : ℚ) = a / b :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨c, rfl⟩,
simp only [mul_comm b, nat.mul_div_assoc c (dvd_refl b), nat.cast_mul, mul_div_assoc,
coe_nat_div_self]
end
lemma inv_coe_int_num {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
begin
rw [rat.inv_def', rat.coe_int_num, rat.coe_int_denom, nat.cast_one, ←int.cast_one],
apply num_div_eq_of_coprime ha0,
rw int.nat_abs_one,
exact nat.coprime_one_left _,
end
lemma inv_coe_nat_num {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
inv_coe_int_num (by exact_mod_cast ha0 : 0 < (a : ℤ))
lemma inv_coe_int_denom {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : ((a : ℚ)⁻¹.denom : ℤ) = a :=
begin
rw [rat.inv_def', rat.coe_int_num, rat.coe_int_denom, nat.cast_one, ←int.cast_one],
apply denom_div_eq_of_coprime ha0,
rw int.nat_abs_one,
exact nat.coprime_one_left _,
end
lemma inv_coe_nat_denom {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.denom = a :=
by exact_mod_cast inv_coe_int_denom (by exact_mod_cast ha0 : 0 < (a : ℤ))
protected lemma «forall» {p : ℚ → Prop} : (∀ r, p r) ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, p (a / b) :=
⟨λ h _ _, h _,
λ h q, (show q = q.num / q.denom, from by simp [rat.div_num_denom]).symm ▸ (h q.1 q.2)⟩
protected lemma «exists» {p : ℚ → Prop} : (∃ r, p r) ↔ ∃ a b : ℤ, p (a / b) :=
⟨λ ⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨r.num, r.denom, by rwa [← mk_eq_div, num_denom]⟩, λ ⟨a, b, h⟩, ⟨_, h⟩⟩
end rat
|
bba92ab5f69eeb3435cd198f6df7cd55e0a231fe | 37583bc2df4ea4f4e29b43ee1302f004c24cfa59 | /tut4.lean | 0af8b288ed199c16246a4f7fbd604f41404b9d43 | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | Vtec234/tpil-solutions | 9cd8576953eb7ea34e5959878bf00f73b035ba4e | 70c1b5c5e33a9c26296edb17cf828327d7f69842 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,389,330,863 | 1,540,413,754,000 | 1,540,413,754,000 | 148,069,811 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,809 | lean | -- use mathlib stuff
import tactic.find
import logic.basic
section notes
universe u
variables (α: Type) (p q: α → Prop) (r: α → α → Prop)
variables (a b c d e: ℤ)
example: (∀ x: α, p x ∧ q x) → ∀ y: α, p y :=
assume h: ∀ x: α, p x ∧ q x,
assume y: α,
show p y, from (h y).left
variable refl_r : ∀ x, r x x
variable symm_r : ∀ {x y}, r x y → r y x
variable trans_r : ∀ {x y z}, r x y → r y z → r x z
-- double transitivity + one symmetry
example (a b c d : α) (hab : r a b) (hcb : r c b) (hcd : r c d) : r a d :=
trans_r (trans_r hab (symm_r hcb)) hcd
example (a b c d: α) (hab: a=b) (hcb: c=b) (hcd: c=d): a=d :=
eq.trans (eq.trans hab (eq.symm hcb)) hcd
-- cool!
example: 2+5 = 7 := rfl
example (α: Type u) (a b: α) (p: α → Prop) (h1: a = b) (h2: p a): p b :=
h1 ▸ h2
example: a+0 = a := add_zero a
example: a*(b+c) = a*b + a*c := mul_add a b c
example (x y: ℤ): (x+y)*(x+y) = x*x + y*x + x*y + y*y :=
have h1: (x+y)*(x+y) = (x+y)*x + (x+y)*y, from mul_add (x+y) x y,
have h2: (x+y)*(x+y) = x*x + y*x + (x*y + y*y),
from (add_mul x y x) ▸ (add_mul x y y) ▸ h1,
h2.trans (add_assoc (x*x + y*x) (x*y) (y*y)).symm
theorem T (h1: a=b) (h2: b=c+1) (h3: c=d) (h4: e=1+d): a=e :=
calc
a = b : by rw h1
... = c+1 : by rw h2
... = d+1 : by rw h3
... = 1+d : by rw add_comm
... = e : by rw h4
theorem T' (h1: a=b) (h2: b=c+1) (h3: c=d) (h4: e=1+d): a=e :=
-- black magic
by simp [h1, h2, h3, h4]
example (x y: ℤ): (x+y)*(x+y) = x*x + y*y + x*y + y*x :=
by simp [mul_add, add_mul]
example (x y z: ℤ) (hxy: x < y) (hyz: y < z):
∃ w, x < w ∧ w < z :=
exists.intro y (and.intro hxy hyz)
#check @exists.intro
variable g : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
variable hg : g 0 0 = 0
theorem gex1 : ∃ x, g x x = x := ⟨0, hg⟩
theorem gex2 : ∃ x, g x 0 = x := ⟨0, hg⟩
theorem gex3 : ∃ x, g 0 0 = x := ⟨0, hg⟩
theorem gex4 : ∃ x, g x x = 0 := ⟨0, hg⟩
set_option pp.implicit true -- display implicit arguments
#print gex1
#print gex2
#print gex3
#print gex4
example (h : ∃ x, p x ∧ q x) : ∃ x, q x ∧ p x :=
match h with ⟨w, hw⟩ :=
⟨w, hw.right, hw.left⟩
end
def is_even (a: ℕ) := ∃ b, a = 2*b
theorem even_plus_even {a b: ℕ}
(h1: is_even a) (h2: is_even b): is_even (a+b) :=
match h1, h2 with
⟨w1, hw1⟩, ⟨w2, hw2⟩ := ⟨w1 + w2, by rw [hw1, hw2, mul_add]⟩
end
-- requires LEM
example (h: ¬ ∀ x, ¬ p x): ∃ x, p x :=
classical.by_contradiction
(assume h1: ¬ ∃ x, p x,
have h2: ∀ x, ¬ p x, from
assume x: α,
assume h3: p x,
-- ‹› <> ⟨⟩: thanks, Leo
have h4: ∃ x, p x, from ⟨x, ‹p x›⟩,
show false, from h1 h4,
show false, from h h2)
end notes
section ex1
variables (α : Type) (p q : α → Prop)
example : (∀ x, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ (∀ x, q x) :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ∀ x, p x ∧ q x,
and.intro
(assume x, show p x, from (h x).left)
(assume x, show q x, from (h x).right))
(assume h: (∀ x, p x) ∧ (∀ x, q x),
assume x,
show p x ∧ q x, from
and.intro (h.left x) (h.right x))
example : (∀ x, p x → q x) → (∀ x, p x) → (∀ x, q x) :=
assume h : (∀ x, p x → q x),
assume h' : (∀ x, p x),
(assume x,
have p x → q x, from h x,
show q x, from this (h' x))
example : (∀ x, p x) ∨ (∀ x, q x) → ∀ x, p x ∨ q x :=
assume h : (∀ x, p x) ∨ (∀ x, q x),
assume x,
or.elim h
(assume : (∀ x, p x), or.inl (this x))
(assume : (∀ x, q x), or.inr (this x))
end ex1
section ex2
variables (α : Type) (p q : α → Prop)
variable r : Prop
example : α → ((∀ x : α, r) ↔ r) :=
assume x: α,
iff.intro
(assume h: (∀ x: α, r), h x)
(assume h: r, assume _: α, h)
example : (∀ x, p x ∨ r) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ r :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ∀ x, p x ∨ r,
classical.by_contradiction
(assume : ¬((∀ x, p x) ∨ r),
have h1: ¬(∀ x, p x) ∧ ¬r, from not_or_distrib.mp this,
have ¬∀ x, p x, from h1.left,
have ¬r, from h1.right,
have ∃ x, ¬p x, from classical.not_forall.mp ‹¬∀ x, p x›,
match this with ⟨x, hpx⟩ :=
show false, from or.elim (h x)
(assume : p x, ‹¬p x› ‹p x›)
(assume : r, ‹¬r› ‹r›)
end))
(assume h: (∀ x, p x) ∨ r,
show (∀ x, p x ∨ r), from or.elim h
(assume hpx: ∀ x, p x, assume x, or.inl (hpx x))
(assume hr: r, assume x, or.inr hr))
example : (∀ x, r → p x) ↔ (r → ∀ x, p x) :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ∀ x, r → p x,
assume hr: r,
assume x,
show p x, from (h x) hr)
(assume h: r → ∀ x, p x,
assume x,
assume hr: r,
show p x, from (h hr) x)
end ex2
section ex3
variables (men : Type) (barber : men)
variable (shaves : men → men → Prop)
example (h : ∀ x : men, shaves barber x ↔ ¬ shaves x x) :
false :=
have h: shaves barber barber ↔ ¬ shaves barber barber, from h barber,
show false, from (iff_not_self _).mp h
end ex3
namespace ex4
def divides (m n : ℕ) : Prop := ∃ k, m * k = n
instance : has_dvd nat := ⟨divides⟩
def even (n : ℕ) : Prop := 2 ∣ n
section
variables m n : ℕ
#check m ∣ n
#check m^n
#check even (m^n +3)
end
def prime (n : ℕ) : Prop := ∀ m, (m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n) →
¬ (m ∣ n)
def infinitely_many_primes : Prop := ∀ p, (prime p) →
(∃ p₂, p < p₂ ∧ prime p₂)
def Fermat_prime (n : ℕ) : Prop := prime n ∧ (∃ k: ℕ, k ≠ 0 ∧ 2^k + 1 = n)
def infinitely_many_Fermat_primes : Prop := ∀ p, (Fermat_prime p) →
(∃ p₂, p < p₂ ∧ Fermat_prime p₂)
def goldbach_conjecture : Prop := ∀ n, (2 ∣ n ∧ n > 2) →
-- TODO prove
(∃ p₁ p₂, prime p₁ ∧ prime p₂ ∧ n = p₁ + p₂)
def Goldbach's_weak_conjecture : Prop := ∀ n, (¬ (2 ∣ n) ∧ n > 5) →
(∃ p₁ p₂ p₃, prime p₁ ∧ prime p₂ ∧ prime p₃ ∧ n = p₁ + p₂ + p₃)
def Fermat's_last_theorem : Prop := ¬ (∃ (a b c n: ℕ),
a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ∧ c > 0 ∧ n > 2 ∧ (a^n + b^n = c^n))
end ex4
section ex5
variables (α : Type) (p q : α → Prop)
-- assume that at α has at least one element
variable a : α
variable r : Prop
-- exists elimination
example : (∃ x : α, r) → r :=
assume h: ∃ x: α, r,
match h with ⟨_, hw⟩ :=
hw
end
-- exists introduction
example : r → (∃ x : α, r) :=
assume hr: r,
-- using assumption about non-emptiness of α here
exists.intro a hr
example : (∃ x, p x ∧ r) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∧ r :=
iff.intro
(assume h: (∃ x, p x ∧ r),
match h with ⟨x, hpr⟩ :=
⟨⟨x, hpr.left⟩, hpr.right⟩
end)
(assume h: (∃ x, p x) ∧ r,
match h.left with ⟨x, hp⟩ :=
⟨x, hp, h.right⟩
end)
example : (∃ x, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∨ (∃ x, q x) :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ∃ x, p x ∨ q x,
match h with ⟨x, hpq⟩ :=
or.elim hpq
(assume hp: p x,
or.inl ⟨x, hp⟩)
(assume hq: q x,
or.inr ⟨x, hq⟩)
end)
(assume h: (∃ x, p x) ∨ (∃ x, q x),
or.elim h
(assume hxp: ∃ x, p x,
match hxp with ⟨x, hp⟩ :=
⟨x, or.inl hp⟩
end)
(assume hxq: ∃ x, q x,
match hxq with ⟨x, hq⟩ :=
⟨x, or.inr hq⟩
end))
-- classical reasoning generally needed to show that something exists
-- but not needed to show "doesn't exist", i.e. ¬(∃ x, blah x)
-- i guess that's because "doesn't exist" doesn't require constructing an example
theorem dne {a: Prop} (h: ¬¬a): a :=
classical.by_cases
(assume ha: a, ha)
(assume hna: ¬a, absurd hna h)
example : (∀ x, p x) ↔ ¬ (∃ x, ¬ p x) :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ∀ x, p x,
assume : ∃ x, ¬p x,
match this with ⟨x, hnp⟩ :=
show false, from hnp (h x)
end)
(assume h: ¬(∃ x, ¬p x),
-- forall_not_of_not_exists proven below
have h1: ∀ x, ¬¬p x, from forall_not_of_not_exists h,
show ∀ x, p x, from assume x,
show p x, from dne (h1 x))
example : (∃ x, p x) ↔ ¬ (∀ x, ¬ p x) :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ∃ x, p x,
match h with ⟨x, hp⟩ :=
assume hno: ∀ x, ¬p x,
show false, from hno x hp
end)
(assume h: ¬(∀ x, ¬p x),
classical.by_contradiction
(assume : ¬(∃ x, p x),
have ∀ x, ¬p x, from forall_not_of_not_exists this,
show false, from h this))
example : (¬ ∃ x, p x) ↔ (∀ x, ¬ p x) :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ¬∃ x, p x,
assume x, assume hp: p x,
have ∃ x, p x, from ⟨x, hp⟩,
h this)
(assume h: ∀ x, ¬p x,
assume : ∃ x, p x,
match this with ⟨x, hp⟩ :=
h x hp
end)
example : (¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ (∃ x, ¬ p x) :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ¬∀ x, p x,
classical.by_contradiction
(assume : ¬(∃ x, ¬p x),
have ∀ x, ¬¬p x, from forall_not_of_not_exists this,
have ∀ x, p x, from assume x, dne (this x),
show false, from h this))
(assume h: ∃ x, ¬p x,
match h with ⟨x, _⟩ :=
assume hno: ∀ x, p x,
have p x, from hno x,
‹¬p x› this
end)
example : (∀ x, p x → r) ↔ (∃ x, p x) → r :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ∀ x, p x → r,
assume : ∃ x, p x,
match this with ⟨x, hp⟩ :=
h x hp
end)
(assume h: (∃ x, p x) → r,
assume x,
assume : p x,
h ⟨x, this⟩)
-- assume decidability of propositions from now on
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable
example : (∃ x, p x → r) ↔ (∀ x, p x) → r :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨x, hpr⟩,
assume : ∀ x, p x,
have p x, from this x,
show r, from hpr this)
(assume h: (∀ x, p x) → r,
classical.by_contradiction
(assume : ¬(∃ x, p x → r),
have ∀ x, ¬(p x → r), from forall_not_of_not_exists this,
have ∀ x, p x ∧ ¬r, from assume x, not_imp.mp (this x),
have (∀ x, p x) ∧ ¬r, from and.intro
(assume x, (this x).left)
-- need non-emptiness of α
(this a).right,
show false, from this.right (h this.left)))
example : (∃ x, r → p x) ↔ (r → ∃ x, p x) :=
iff.intro
(assume h: ∃ x, r → p x,
match h with ⟨x, hrp⟩ :=
assume hr: r,
⟨x, hrp hr⟩
end)
(assume h: r → ∃ x, p x,
classical.by_contradiction
(assume : ¬(∃ x, r → p x),
have ∀ x, ¬(r → p x), from forall_not_of_not_exists this,
have h1: ∀ x, r ∧ ¬p x, from assume x, not_imp.mp (this x),
-- need non-emptiness of α
have ∃ x, p x, from h (h1 a).left,
have h2: ¬(∀ x, ¬p x), from not_forall_not.mpr this,
have h3: ∀ x, ¬p x, from assume x, (h1 x).right,
show false, from h2 h3))
end ex5
section ex6
variables (real : Type) [ordered_ring real]
variables (log exp : real → real)
variable log_exp_eq : ∀ x, log (exp x) = x
variable exp_log_eq : ∀ {x}, x > 0 → exp (log x) = x
variable exp_pos : ∀ x, exp x > 0
variable exp_add : ∀ x y, exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y
-- this ensures the assumptions are available in tactic proofs
include log_exp_eq exp_log_eq exp_pos exp_add
example (x y z : real) :
exp (x + y + z) = exp x * exp y * exp z :=
by rw [exp_add, exp_add]
example (y : real) (h : y > 0) : exp (log y) = y :=
exp_log_eq h
theorem log_mul {x y : real} (hx : x > 0) (hy : y > 0) :
log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
calc
log (x * y) = log (exp (log x) * y) : by rw exp_log_eq hx
... = log (exp (log x) * exp (log y)) : by rw exp_log_eq hy
... = log (exp (log x + log y)) : by rw exp_add
... = log x + log y : by rw log_exp_eq
end ex6
section ex7
#check sub_self
example (x : ℤ) : x * 0 = 0 :=
calc
x * 0 = x * (x - x) : by rw sub_self
... = x * x - x * x : by rw mul_sub
... = 0 : by rw sub_self
end ex7
|
cc51f759238b0406e71a2fe91642fa0e361c9e74 | 947fa6c38e48771ae886239b4edce6db6e18d0fb | /src/data/seq/computation.lean | 819eb5174e804b6f410d6133a65bba466f7cd885 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ramonfmir/mathlib | c5dc8b33155473fab97c38bd3aa6723dc289beaa | 14c52e990c17f5a00c0cc9e09847af16fabbed25 | refs/heads/master | 1,661,979,343,526 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 182,072,989 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,585,876,000 | 1,555,585,876,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,995 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
-/
import tactic.basic
import data.stream.init
import logic.relator
open function
universes u v w
/-
coinductive computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| return : α → computation α
| think : computation α → computation α
-/
/-- `computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `computation α` is an infinite sequence of `option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{f : stream (option α) // ∀ {n a}, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a}
namespace computation
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `return a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
def return (a : α) : computation α := ⟨stream.const (some a), λ n a', id⟩
instance : has_coe_t α (computation α) := ⟨return⟩ -- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : computation α) : computation α :=
⟨none :: c.1, λ n a h, by {cases n with n, contradiction, exact c.2 h}⟩
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : computation α) : ℕ → computation α
| 0 := c
| (n+1) := think (thinkN n)
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = return a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : computation α) : option α := c.1.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = return a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : computation α) : computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, λ n a, let t := c.2 in t⟩
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : computation α := ⟨stream.const none, λ n a', id⟩
instance : inhabited (computation α) := ⟨empty _⟩
/-- `run_for c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def run_for : computation α → ℕ → option α := subtype.val
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = return a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : computation α) : α ⊕ computation α :=
match c.1 0 with
| none := sum.inr (tail c)
| some a := sum.inl a
end
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
meta def run : computation α → α | c :=
match destruct c with
| sum.inl a := a
| sum.inr ca := run ca
end
theorem destruct_eq_ret {s : computation α} {a : α} :
destruct s = sum.inl a → s = return a :=
begin
dsimp [destruct],
induction f0 : s.1 0; intro h,
{ contradiction },
{ apply subtype.eq, funext n,
induction n with n IH,
{ injection h with h', rwa h' at f0 },
{ exact s.2 IH } }
end
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : computation α} {s'} :
destruct s = sum.inr s' → s = think s' :=
begin
dsimp [destruct],
induction f0 : s.1 0 with a'; intro h,
{ injection h with h', rw ←h',
cases s with f al,
apply subtype.eq, dsimp [think, tail],
rw ←f0, exact (stream.eta f).symm },
{ contradiction }
end
@[simp] theorem destruct_ret (a : α) : destruct (return a) = sum.inl a := rfl
@[simp] theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : computation α, destruct (think s) = sum.inr s
| ⟨f, al⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = sum.inr (empty α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_ret (a : α) : head (return a) = some a := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_think (s : computation α) : head (think s) = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_ret (a : α) : tail (return a) = return a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_think (s : computation α) : tail (think s) = s :=
by cases s with f al; apply subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]; rw [stream.tail_cons]
@[simp] theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α := rfl
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
def cases_on {C : computation α → Sort v} (s : computation α)
(h1 : ∀ a, C (return a)) (h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s := begin
induction H : destruct s with v v,
{ rw destruct_eq_ret H, apply h1 },
{ cases v with a s', rw destruct_eq_think H, apply h2 }
end
def corec.F (f : β → α ⊕ β) : α ⊕ β → option α × (α ⊕ β)
| (sum.inl a) := (some a, sum.inl a)
| (sum.inr b) := (match f b with
| sum.inl a := some a
| sum.inr b' := none
end, f b)
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = return a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : computation α :=
begin
refine ⟨stream.corec' (corec.F f) (sum.inr b), λ n a' h, _⟩,
rw stream.corec'_eq,
change stream.corec' (corec.F f) (corec.F f (sum.inr b)).2 n = some a',
revert h, generalize : sum.inr b = o, revert o,
induction n with n IH; intro o,
{ change (corec.F f o).1 = some a' → (corec.F f (corec.F f o).2).1 = some a',
cases o with a b; intro h, { exact h },
dsimp [corec.F] at h, dsimp [corec.F],
cases f b with a b', { exact h },
{ contradiction } },
{ rw [stream.corec'_eq (corec.F f) (corec.F f o).2,
stream.corec'_eq (corec.F f) o],
exact IH (corec.F f o).2 }
end
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : α ⊕ γ → β ⊕ γ
| (sum.inl a) := sum.inl (f a)
| (sum.inr b) := sum.inr b
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ γ
| (sum.inl a) := sum.inl a
| (sum.inr b) := sum.inr (f b)
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
@[simp] lemma corec_eq (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) :
destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) :=
begin
dsimp [corec, destruct],
change stream.corec' (corec.F f) (sum.inr b) 0 with corec.F._match_1 (f b),
induction h : f b with a b', { refl },
dsimp [corec.F, destruct],
apply congr_arg, apply subtype.eq,
dsimp [corec, tail],
rw [stream.corec'_eq, stream.tail_cons],
dsimp [corec.F], rw h
end
section bisim
variable (R : computation α → computation α → Prop)
local infix ` ~ `:50 := R
def bisim_o : α ⊕ computation α → α ⊕ computation α → Prop
| (sum.inl a) (sum.inl a') := a = a'
| (sum.inr s) (sum.inr s') := R s s'
| _ _ := false
attribute [simp] bisim_o
def is_bisimulation := ∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → bisim_o R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : is_bisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
begin
apply subtype.eq,
apply stream.eq_of_bisim (λ x y, ∃ s s' : computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'),
dsimp [stream.is_bisimulation],
intros t₁ t₂ e,
exact match t₁, t₂, e with ._, ._, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ :=
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s'), from
and.imp id (λ r, ⟨tail s, tail s',
by cases s; refl, by cases s'; refl, r⟩) this,
begin
have := bisim r, revert r this,
apply cases_on s _ _; intros; apply cases_on s' _ _; intros; intros r this,
{ constructor, dsimp at this, rw this, assumption },
{ rw [destruct_ret, destruct_think] at this,
exact false.elim this },
{ rw [destruct_ret, destruct_think] at this,
exact false.elim this },
{ simp at this, simp [*] }
end
end,
exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end
end bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
protected def mem (a : α) (s : computation α) := some a ∈ s.1
instance : has_mem α (computation α) := ⟨computation.mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a :=
by {cases s with f al, induction h with n h IH, exacts [id, λ h2, al (IH h2)]}
theorem mem_unique {s : computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩ ⟨n, hb⟩ := by injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans
(le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
theorem mem.left_unique : relator.left_unique ((∈) : α → computation α → Prop) :=
λ a s b, mem_unique
/-- `terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class terminates (s : computation α) : Prop := (term : ∃ a, a ∈ s)
theorem terminates_iff (s : computation α) : terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, h.1, terminates.mk⟩
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
theorem terminates_def (s : computation α) : terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).is_some :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩, ⟨n, by {dsimp [stream.nth] at h, rw ←h, exact rfl}⟩,
λ ⟨n, h⟩, ⟨⟨option.get h, n, (option.eq_some_of_is_some h).symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ return a :=
exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem eq_of_ret_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ return a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : terminates (return a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
theorem think_mem {s : computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ := ⟨n+1, h⟩
instance think_terminates (s : computation α) :
∀ [terminates s], terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ := ⟨⟨a, n+1, h⟩⟩
theorem of_think_mem {s : computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ := by {cases n with n', contradiction, exact ⟨n', h⟩}
theorem of_think_terminates {s : computation α} :
terminates (think s) → terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ := ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α :=
λ ⟨n, h⟩, by clear _fun_match; contradiction
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬ terminates (empty α) :=
λ ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, not_mem_empty a h
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬ terminates s) : s = empty α :=
begin
apply subtype.eq, funext n,
induction h : s.val n, {refl},
refine absurd _ H, exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
end
theorem thinkN_mem {s : computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 := iff.rfl
| (n+1) := iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
instance thinkN_terminates (s : computation α) :
∀ [terminates s] n, terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ n := ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : computation α) (n) :
terminates (thinkN s n) → terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ := ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
/-- `promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def promises (s : computation α) (a : α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
infix ` ~> `:50 := promises
theorem mem_promises {s : computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a :=
λ h a', mem_unique h
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a :=
λ a' h, absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
section get
variables (s : computation α) [h : terminates s]
include s h
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ := nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α := option.get (nat.find_spec $ (terminates_def _).1 h)
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
exists.intro (length s) (option.eq_some_of_is_some _).symm
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s :=
by intro h; rw ←h; apply get_mem
@[simp] theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ $ let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s in ⟨n+1, h⟩
@[simp] theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ $ (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := λ a, get_eq_of_mem _
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s :=
by { casesI h, cases h with a' h, rw p h, exact h }
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
end get
/-- `results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def results (s : computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ (h : a ∈ s), @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
theorem results_of_terminates (s : computation α) [T : terminates s] :
results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : computation α) [T : terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
results s a (length s) :=
by rw ←get_eq_of_mem _ h; apply results_of_terminates
theorem results.mem {s : computation α} {a n} : results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ := m
theorem results.terminates {s : computation α} {a n} (h : results s a n) : terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
theorem results.length {s : computation α} {a n} [T : terminates s] :
results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ := h
theorem results.val_unique {s : computation α} {a b m n}
(h1 : results s a m) (h2 : results s b n) : a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
theorem results.len_unique {s : computation α} {a b m n}
(h1 : results s a m) (h2 : results s b n) : m = n :=
by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [←h1.length, h2.length]
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, results s a n :=
by haveI := terminates_of_mem h; exact ⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
@[simp] theorem get_ret (a : α) : get (return a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem length_ret (a : α) : length (return a) = 0 :=
let h := computation.ret_terminates a in
nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $ nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (return a)).1 h) rfl
theorem results_ret (a : α) : results (return a) a 0 :=
⟨_, length_ret _⟩
@[simp] theorem length_think (s : computation α) [h : terminates s] :
length (think s) = length s + 1 :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ exact nat.find_min' _ (nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h)) },
{ have : (option.is_some ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates),
cases length (think s) with n,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nat.succ_le_succ, apply nat.find_min', apply this } }
end
theorem results_think {s : computation α} {a n}
(h : results s a n) : results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
by haveI := h.terminates; exact ⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
theorem of_results_think {s : computation α} {a n}
(h : results (think s) a n) : ∃ m, results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 :=
begin
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates,
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem),
exact ⟨_, this, results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩,
end
@[simp] theorem results_think_iff {s : computation α} {a n} :
results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ results s a n :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h in by injection e with h'; rwa h',
results_think⟩
theorem results_thinkN {s : computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, results s a m → results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0 h := h
| (n+1) h := results_think (results_thinkN n h)
theorem results_thinkN_ret (a : α) (n) : results (thinkN (return a) n) a n :=
by have := results_thinkN n (results_ret a); rwa nat.zero_add at this
@[simp] theorem length_thinkN (s : computation α) [h : terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
theorem eq_thinkN {s : computation α} {a n} (h : results s a n) :
s = thinkN (return a) n :=
begin
revert s,
induction n with n IH; intro s;
apply cases_on s (λ a', _) (λ s, _); intro h,
{ rw ←eq_of_ret_mem h.mem, refl },
{ cases of_results_think h with n h, cases h, contradiction },
{ have := h.len_unique (results_ret _), contradiction },
{ rw IH (results_think_iff.1 h), refl }
end
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : computation α) [h : terminates s] :
s = thinkN (return (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
def mem_rec_on {C : computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s)
(h1 : C (return a)) (h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
begin
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M,
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M],
generalize : length s = n,
induction n with n IH, exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
end
def terminates_rec_on {C : computation α → Sort v} (s) [terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (return a)) (h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
mem_rec_on (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : computation α → computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ := ⟨s.map (λ o, option.cases_on o none (some ∘ f)),
λ n b, begin
dsimp [stream.map, stream.nth],
induction e : s n with a; intro h,
{ contradiction }, { rw [al e, ←h] }
end⟩
def bind.G : β ⊕ computation β → β ⊕ computation α ⊕ computation β
| (sum.inl b) := sum.inl b
| (sum.inr cb') := sum.inr $ sum.inr cb'
def bind.F (f : α → computation β) :
computation α ⊕ computation β → β ⊕ computation α ⊕ computation β
| (sum.inl ca) :=
match destruct ca with
| sum.inl a := bind.G $ destruct (f a)
| sum.inr ca' := sum.inr $ sum.inl ca'
end
| (sum.inr cb) := bind.G $ destruct cb
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : computation α) (f : α → computation β) : computation β :=
corec (bind.F f) (sum.inl c)
instance : has_bind computation := ⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : computation α) (f : α → computation β) :
c >>= f = bind c f := rfl
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : computation (computation α)) : computation α := c >>= id
@[simp] theorem map_ret (f : α → β) (a) : map f (return a) = return (f a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_think (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (think s) = think (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ := by apply subtype.eq; dsimp [think, map]; rw stream.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s) : destruct (map f s) = lmap f (rmap (map f) (destruct s)) :=
by apply s.cases_on; intro; simp
@[simp] theorem map_id : ∀ (s : computation α), map id s = s
| ⟨f, al⟩ := begin
apply subtype.eq; simp [map, function.comp],
have e : (@option.rec α (λ _, option α) none some) = id,
{ ext ⟨⟩; refl },
simp [e, stream.map_id]
end
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
∀ (s : computation α), map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ := begin
apply subtype.eq; dsimp [map],
rw stream.map_map,
apply congr_arg (λ f : _ → option γ, stream.map f s),
ext ⟨⟩; refl
end
@[simp] theorem ret_bind (a) (f : α → computation β) :
bind (return a) f = f a :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λ c₁ c₂,
c₁ = bind (return a) f ∧ c₂ = f a ∨
c₁ = corec (bind.F f) (sum.inr c₂)),
{ intros c₁ c₂ h,
exact match c₁, c₂, h with
| ._, ._, or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
simp [bind, bind.F],
cases destruct (f a) with b cb; simp [bind.G]
end
| ._, c, or.inr rfl := begin
simp [bind.F],
cases destruct c with b cb; simp [bind.G]
end end },
{ simp }
end
@[simp] theorem think_bind (c) (f : α → computation β) :
bind (think c) f = think (bind c f) :=
destruct_eq_think $ by simp [bind, bind.F]
@[simp] theorem bind_ret (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (return ∘ f) = map f s :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λ c₁ c₂, c₁ = c₂ ∨
∃ s, c₁ = bind s (return ∘ f) ∧ c₂ = map f s),
{ intros c₁ c₂ h,
exact match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, or.inl (eq.refl c) := begin cases destruct c with b cb; simp end
| _, _, or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
apply cases_on s; intros s; simp,
exact or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
end end },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] theorem bind_ret' (s : computation α) : bind s return = s :=
by rw bind_ret; change (λ x : α, x) with @id α; rw map_id
@[simp] theorem bind_assoc (s : computation α) (f : α → computation β) (g : β → computation γ) :
bind (bind s f) g = bind s (λ (x : α), bind (f x) g) :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λ c₁ c₂, c₁ = c₂ ∨
∃ s, c₁ = bind (bind s f) g ∧ c₂ = bind s (λ (x : α), bind (f x) g)),
{ intros c₁ c₂ h,
exact match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, or.inl (eq.refl c) := by cases destruct c with b cb; simp
| ._, ._, or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ := begin
apply cases_on s; intros s; simp,
{ generalize : f s = fs,
apply cases_on fs; intros t; simp,
{ cases destruct (g t) with b cb; simp } },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end end },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem results_bind {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {a b m n}
(h1 : results s a m) (h2 : results (f a) b n) : results (bind s f) b (n + m) :=
begin
have := h1.mem, revert m,
apply mem_rec_on this _ (λ s IH, _); intros m h1,
{ rw [ret_bind], rw h1.len_unique (results_ret _), exact h2 },
{ rw [think_bind], cases of_results_think h1 with m' h, cases h with h1 e,
rw e, exact results_think (IH h1) }
end
theorem mem_bind {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {a b}
(h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ f a) : b ∈ bind s f :=
let ⟨m, h1⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h1,
⟨n, h2⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h2 in (results_bind h1 h2).mem
instance terminates_bind (s : computation α) (f : α → computation β)
[terminates s] [terminates (f (get s))] :
terminates (bind s f) :=
terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp] theorem get_bind (s : computation α) (f : α → computation β)
[terminates s] [terminates (f (get s))] :
get (bind s f) = get (f (get s)) :=
get_eq_of_mem _ (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp] theorem length_bind (s : computation α) (f : α → computation β)
[T1 : terminates s] [T2 : terminates (f (get s))] :
length (bind s f) = length (f (get s)) + length s :=
(results_of_terminates _).len_unique $
results_bind (results_of_terminates _) (results_of_terminates _)
theorem of_results_bind {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {b k} :
results (bind s f) b k →
∃ a m n, results s a m ∧ results (f a) b n ∧ k = n + m :=
begin
induction k with n IH generalizing s;
apply cases_on s (λ a, _) (λ s', _); intro e,
{ simp [thinkN] at e, refine ⟨a, _, _, results_ret _, e, rfl⟩ },
{ have := congr_arg head (eq_thinkN e), contradiction },
{ simp at e, refine ⟨a, _, n+1, results_ret _, e, rfl⟩ },
{ simp at e, exact let ⟨a, m, n', h1, h2, e'⟩ := IH e in
by rw e'; exact ⟨a, m.succ, n', results_think h1, h2, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {b}
(h : b ∈ bind s f) : ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨k, h⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h,
⟨a, m, n, h1, h2, e⟩ := of_results_bind h in ⟨a, h1.mem, h2.mem⟩
theorem bind_promises {s : computation α} {f : α → computation β} {a b}
(h1 : s ~> a) (h2 : f a ~> b) : bind s f ~> b :=
λ b' bB, begin
rcases exists_of_mem_bind bB with ⟨a', a's, ba'⟩,
rw ←h1 a's at ba', exact h2 ba'
end
instance : monad computation :=
{ map := @map,
pure := @return,
bind := @bind }
instance : is_lawful_monad computation :=
{ id_map := @map_id,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := @bind_ret,
pure_bind := @ret_bind,
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc }
theorem has_map_eq_map {β} (f : α → β) (c : computation α) : f <$> c = map f c := rfl
@[simp] theorem return_def (a) : (_root_.return a : computation α) = return a := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_ret' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (a), f <$> return a = return (f a) := map_ret
@[simp] theorem map_think' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) s, f <$> think s = think (f <$> s) := map_think
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a} {s : computation α} (m : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s :=
by rw ←bind_ret; apply mem_bind m; apply ret_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : computation α} (h : b ∈ map f s) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
by rw ←bind_ret at h; exact
let ⟨a, as, fb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h in ⟨a, as, mem_unique (ret_mem _) fb⟩
instance terminates_map (f : α → β) (s : computation α) [terminates s] : terminates (map f s) :=
by rw ←bind_ret; apply_instance
theorem terminates_map_iff (f : α → β) (s : computation α) :
terminates (map f s) ↔ terminates s :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, let ⟨b, h1, _⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h in ⟨⟨_, h1⟩⟩,
@computation.terminates_map _ _ _ _⟩
-- Parallel computation
/-- `c₁ <|> c₂` calculates `c₁` and `c₂` simultaneously, returning
the first one that gives a result. -/
def orelse (c₁ c₂ : computation α) : computation α :=
@computation.corec α (computation α × computation α)
(λ ⟨c₁, c₂⟩, match destruct c₁ with
| sum.inl a := sum.inl a
| sum.inr c₁' := match destruct c₂ with
| sum.inl a := sum.inl a
| sum.inr c₂' := sum.inr (c₁', c₂')
end
end) (c₁, c₂)
instance : alternative computation :=
{ orelse := @orelse, failure := @empty, ..computation.monad }
@[simp] theorem ret_orelse (a : α) (c₂ : computation α) :
(return a <|> c₂) = return a :=
destruct_eq_ret $ by unfold has_orelse.orelse; simp [orelse]
@[simp] theorem orelse_ret (c₁ : computation α) (a : α) :
(think c₁ <|> return a) = return a :=
destruct_eq_ret $ by unfold has_orelse.orelse; simp [orelse]
@[simp] theorem orelse_think (c₁ c₂ : computation α) :
(think c₁ <|> think c₂) = think (c₁ <|> c₂) :=
destruct_eq_think $ by unfold has_orelse.orelse; simp [orelse]
@[simp] theorem empty_orelse (c) : (empty α <|> c) = c :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λ c₁ c₂, (empty α <|> c₂) = c₁) _ rfl,
intros s' s h, rw ←h,
apply cases_on s; intros s; rw think_empty; simp,
rw ←think_empty,
end
@[simp] theorem orelse_empty (c : computation α) : (c <|> empty α) = c :=
begin
apply eq_of_bisim (λ c₁ c₂, (c₂ <|> empty α) = c₁) _ rfl,
intros s' s h, rw ←h,
apply cases_on s; intros s; rw think_empty; simp,
rw←think_empty,
end
/-- `c₁ ~ c₂` asserts that `c₁` and `c₂` either both terminate with the same result,
or both loop forever. -/
def equiv (c₁ c₂ : computation α) : Prop := ∀ a, a ∈ c₁ ↔ a ∈ c₂
infix ` ~ `:50 := equiv
@[refl] theorem equiv.refl (s : computation α) : s ~ s := λ _, iff.rfl
@[symm] theorem equiv.symm {s t : computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ s :=
λ h a, (h a).symm
@[trans] theorem equiv.trans {s t u : computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ u → s ~ u :=
λ h1 h2 a, (h1 a).trans (h2 a)
theorem equiv.equivalence : equivalence (@equiv α) :=
⟨@equiv.refl _, @equiv.symm _, @equiv.trans _⟩
theorem equiv_of_mem {s t : computation α} {a} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : a ∈ t) : s ~ t :=
λ a', ⟨λ ma, by rw mem_unique ma h1; exact h2,
λ ma, by rw mem_unique ma h2; exact h1⟩
theorem terminates_congr {c₁ c₂ : computation α}
(h : c₁ ~ c₂) : terminates c₁ ↔ terminates c₂ :=
by simp only [terminates_iff, exists_congr h]
theorem promises_congr {c₁ c₂ : computation α}
(h : c₁ ~ c₂) (a) : c₁ ~> a ↔ c₂ ~> a :=
forall_congr (λ a', imp_congr (h a') iff.rfl)
theorem get_equiv {c₁ c₂ : computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂)
[terminates c₁] [terminates c₂] : get c₁ = get c₂ :=
get_eq_of_mem _ $ (h _).2 $ get_mem _
theorem think_equiv (s : computation α) : think s ~ s :=
λ a, ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩
theorem thinkN_equiv (s : computation α) (n) : thinkN s n ~ s :=
λ a, thinkN_mem n
theorem bind_congr {s1 s2 : computation α} {f1 f2 : α → computation β}
(h1 : s1 ~ s2) (h2 : ∀ a, f1 a ~ f2 a) : bind s1 f1 ~ bind s2 f2 :=
λ b, ⟨λ h, let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h in
mem_bind ((h1 a).1 ha) ((h2 a b).1 hb),
λ h, let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h in
mem_bind ((h1 a).2 ha) ((h2 a b).2 hb)⟩
theorem equiv_ret_of_mem {s : computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : s ~ return a :=
equiv_of_mem h (ret_mem _)
/-- `lift_rel R ca cb` is a generalization of `equiv` to relations other than
equality. It asserts that if `ca` terminates with `a`, then `cb` terminates with
some `b` such that `R a b`, and if `cb` terminates with `b` then `ca` terminates
with some `a` such that `R a b`. -/
def lift_rel (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (cb : computation β) : Prop :=
(∀ {a}, a ∈ ca → ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b) ∧
∀ {b}, b ∈ cb → ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
theorem lift_rel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (cb : computation β) :
lift_rel (swap R) cb ca ↔ lift_rel R ca cb :=
and_comm _ _
theorem lift_eq_iff_equiv (c₁ c₂ : computation α) : lift_rel (=) c₁ c₂ ↔ c₁ ~ c₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨h1, h2⟩ a,
⟨λ a1, let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := h1 a1 in by rwa ab,
λ a2, let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := h2 a2 in by rwa ←ab⟩,
λ e, ⟨λ a a1, ⟨a, (e _).1 a1, rfl⟩, λ a a2, ⟨a, (e _).2 a2, rfl⟩⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : reflexive R) : reflexive (lift_rel R) :=
λ s, ⟨λ a as, ⟨a, as, H a⟩, λ b bs, ⟨b, bs, H b⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : symmetric R) : symmetric (lift_rel R) :=
λ s1 s2 ⟨l, r⟩,
⟨λ a a2, let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := r a2 in ⟨b, b1, H ab⟩,
λ a a1, let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l a1 in ⟨b, b2, H ab⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : transitive R) : transitive (lift_rel R) :=
λ s1 s2 s3 ⟨l1, r1⟩ ⟨l2, r2⟩,
⟨λ a a1, let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1, ⟨c, c3, bc⟩ := l2 b2 in ⟨c, c3, H ab bc⟩,
λ c c3, let ⟨b, b2, bc⟩ := r2 c3, ⟨a, a1, ab⟩ := r1 b2 in ⟨a, a1, H ab bc⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : equivalence R → equivalence (lift_rel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ :=
⟨lift_rel.refl R refl, lift_rel.symm R symm, lift_rel.trans R trans⟩
theorem lift_rel.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) (s t) :
lift_rel R s t → lift_rel S s t | ⟨l, r⟩ :=
⟨λ a as, let ⟨b, bt, ab⟩ := l as in ⟨b, bt, H ab⟩,
λ b bt, let ⟨a, as, ab⟩ := r bt in ⟨a, as, H ab⟩⟩
theorem terminates_of_lift_rel {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} :
lift_rel R s t → (terminates s ↔ terminates t) | ⟨l, r⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, as⟩⟩, let ⟨b, bt, ab⟩ := l as in ⟨⟨b, bt⟩⟩,
λ ⟨⟨b, bt⟩⟩, let ⟨a, as, ab⟩ := r bt in ⟨⟨a, as⟩⟩⟩
theorem rel_of_lift_rel {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} :
lift_rel R ca cb → ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b
| ⟨l, r⟩ a b ma mb :=
let ⟨b', mb', ab'⟩ := l ma in by rw mem_unique mb mb'; exact ab'
theorem lift_rel_of_mem {R : α → β → Prop} {a b ca cb}
(ma : a ∈ ca) (mb : b ∈ cb) (ab : R a b) : lift_rel R ca cb :=
⟨λ a' ma', by rw mem_unique ma' ma; exact ⟨b, mb, ab⟩,
λ b' mb', by rw mem_unique mb' mb; exact ⟨a, ma, ab⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_lift_rel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb}
(H : lift_rel R ca cb) {a} (h : a ∈ ca) : ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
H.left h
theorem exists_of_lift_rel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb}
(H : lift_rel R ca cb) {b} (h : b ∈ cb) : ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
H.right h
theorem lift_rel_def {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} : lift_rel R ca cb ↔
(terminates ca ↔ terminates cb) ∧ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨terminates_of_lift_rel h, λ a b ma mb,
let ⟨b', mb', ab⟩ := h.left ma in by rwa mem_unique mb mb'⟩,
λ ⟨l, r⟩,
⟨λ a ma, let ⟨⟨b, mb⟩⟩ := l.1 ⟨⟨_, ma⟩⟩ in ⟨b, mb, r ma mb⟩,
λ b mb, let ⟨⟨a, ma⟩⟩ := l.2 ⟨⟨_, mb⟩⟩ in ⟨a, ma, r ma mb⟩⟩⟩
theorem lift_rel_bind {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop)
{s1 : computation α} {s2 : computation β}
{f1 : α → computation γ} {f2 : β → computation δ}
(h1 : lift_rel R s1 s2) (h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → lift_rel S (f1 a) (f2 b))
: lift_rel S (bind s1 f1) (bind s2 f2) :=
let ⟨l1, r1⟩ := h1 in
⟨λ c cB,
let ⟨a, a1, c₁⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind cB,
⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1,
⟨l2, r2⟩ := h2 ab,
⟨d, d2, cd⟩ := l2 c₁ in
⟨_, mem_bind b2 d2, cd⟩,
λ d dB,
let ⟨b, b1, d1⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind dB,
⟨a, a2, ab⟩ := r1 b1,
⟨l2, r2⟩ := h2 ab,
⟨c, c₂, cd⟩ := r2 d1 in
⟨_, mem_bind a2 c₂, cd⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_return_left (R : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (cb : computation β) :
lift_rel R (return a) cb ↔ ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
⟨λ ⟨l, r⟩, l (ret_mem _),
λ ⟨b, mb, ab⟩,
⟨λ a' ma', by rw eq_of_ret_mem ma'; exact ⟨b, mb, ab⟩,
λ b' mb', ⟨_, ret_mem _, by rw mem_unique mb' mb; exact ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_return_right (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (b : β) :
lift_rel R ca (return b) ↔ ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
by rw [lift_rel.swap, lift_rel_return_left]
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_return (R : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (b : β) :
lift_rel R (return a) (return b) ↔ R a b :=
by rw [lift_rel_return_left]; exact
⟨λ ⟨b', mb', ab'⟩, by rwa eq_of_ret_mem mb' at ab',
λ ab, ⟨_, ret_mem _, ab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (cb : computation β) :
lift_rel R (think ca) cb ↔ lift_rel R ca cb :=
and_congr (forall_congr $ λ b, imp_congr ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ iff.rfl)
(forall_congr $ λ b, imp_congr iff.rfl $
exists_congr $ λ b, and_congr ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ iff.rfl)
@[simp] theorem lift_rel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : computation α) (cb : computation β) :
lift_rel R ca (think cb) ↔ lift_rel R ca cb :=
by rw [←lift_rel.swap R, ←lift_rel.swap R]; apply lift_rel_think_left
theorem lift_rel_mem_cases {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb}
(Ha : ∀ a ∈ ca, lift_rel R ca cb)
(Hb : ∀ b ∈ cb, lift_rel R ca cb) : lift_rel R ca cb :=
⟨λ a ma, (Ha _ ma).left ma, λ b mb, (Hb _ mb).right mb⟩
theorem lift_rel_congr {R : α → β → Prop} {ca ca' : computation α} {cb cb' : computation β}
(ha : ca ~ ca') (hb : cb ~ cb') : lift_rel R ca cb ↔ lift_rel R ca' cb' :=
and_congr
(forall_congr $ λ a, imp_congr (ha _) $ exists_congr $ λ b, and_congr (hb _) iff.rfl)
(forall_congr $ λ b, imp_congr (hb _) $ exists_congr $ λ a, and_congr (ha _) iff.rfl)
theorem lift_rel_map {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop)
{s1 : computation α} {s2 : computation β}
{f1 : α → γ} {f2 : β → δ}
(h1 : lift_rel R s1 s2) (h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S (f1 a) (f2 b))
: lift_rel S (map f1 s1) (map f2 s2) :=
by rw [←bind_ret, ←bind_ret]; apply lift_rel_bind _ _ h1; simp; exact @h2
theorem map_congr (R : α → α → Prop) (S : β → β → Prop)
{s1 s2 : computation α} {f : α → β}
(h1 : s1 ~ s2) : map f s1 ~ map f s2 :=
by rw [←lift_eq_iff_equiv];
exact lift_rel_map eq _ ((lift_eq_iff_equiv _ _).2 h1) (λ a b, congr_arg _)
def lift_rel_aux (R : α → β → Prop)
(C : computation α → computation β → Prop) :
α ⊕ computation α → β ⊕ computation β → Prop
| (sum.inl a) (sum.inl b) := R a b
| (sum.inl a) (sum.inr cb) := ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b
| (sum.inr ca) (sum.inl b) := ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
| (sum.inr ca) (sum.inr cb) := C ca cb
attribute [simp] lift_rel_aux
@[simp] lemma lift_rel_aux.ret_left (R : α → β → Prop)
(C : computation α → computation β → Prop) (a cb) :
lift_rel_aux R C (sum.inl a) (destruct cb) ↔ ∃ {b}, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
begin
apply cb.cases_on (λ b, _) (λ cb, _),
{ exact ⟨λ h, ⟨_, ret_mem _, h⟩, λ ⟨b', mb, h⟩,
by rw [mem_unique (ret_mem _) mb]; exact h⟩ },
{ rw [destruct_think],
exact ⟨λ ⟨b, h, r⟩, ⟨b, think_mem h, r⟩,
λ ⟨b, h, r⟩, ⟨b, of_think_mem h, r⟩⟩ }
end
theorem lift_rel_aux.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) (a b) :
lift_rel_aux (swap R) (swap C) b a = lift_rel_aux R C a b :=
by cases a with a ca; cases b with b cb; simp only [lift_rel_aux]
@[simp] lemma lift_rel_aux.ret_right (R : α → β → Prop)
(C : computation α → computation β → Prop) (b ca) :
lift_rel_aux R C (destruct ca) (sum.inl b) ↔ ∃ {a}, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
by rw [←lift_rel_aux.swap, lift_rel_aux.ret_left]
theorem lift_rel_rec.lem {R : α → β → Prop} (C : computation α → computation β → Prop)
(H : ∀ {ca cb}, C ca cb → lift_rel_aux R C (destruct ca) (destruct cb))
(ca cb) (Hc : C ca cb) (a) (ha : a ∈ ca) : lift_rel R ca cb :=
begin
revert cb, refine mem_rec_on ha _ (λ ca' IH, _);
intros cb Hc; have h := H Hc,
{ simp at h, simp [h] },
{ have h := H Hc, simp, revert h, apply cb.cases_on (λ b, _) (λ cb', _);
intro h; simp at h; simp [h], exact IH _ h }
end
theorem lift_rel_rec {R : α → β → Prop} (C : computation α → computation β → Prop)
(H : ∀ {ca cb}, C ca cb → lift_rel_aux R C (destruct ca) (destruct cb))
(ca cb) (Hc : C ca cb) : lift_rel R ca cb :=
lift_rel_mem_cases (lift_rel_rec.lem C @H ca cb Hc) (λ b hb,
(lift_rel.swap _ _ _).2 $
lift_rel_rec.lem (swap C)
(λ cb ca h, cast (lift_rel_aux.swap _ _ _ _).symm $ H h)
cb ca Hc b hb)
end computation
|
5381557b105bcc3471f21349c1a42ad6e6d5b02e | 6b2a480f27775cba4f3ae191b1c1387a29de586e | /group_rep1/programmation/apply_fun.lean | f8d7a1705e48115dfddf89f067665ed97740e1e0 | [] | no_license | Or7ando/group_representation | a681de2e19d1930a1e1be573d6735a2f0b8356cb | 9b576984f17764ebf26c8caa2a542d248f1b50d2 | refs/heads/master | 1,662,413,107,324 | 1,590,302,389,000 | 1,590,302,389,000 | 258,130,829 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,540 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import tactic.monotonicity
import order.basic
open tactic interactive (parse) interactive (loc.ns)
interactive.types (texpr location) lean.parser (tk)
local postfix `?`:9001 := optional
/--
But : change _ = _ `name` `at` h
c'est en deux temps :
1. change _ = _ motif at
2. rw name
même syntaxe que bidule tk parse `using` appliquer change avant
-/
meta def apply_fun_name (e : pexpr) (h : name) (M : option pexpr) : tactic unit :=
do {
H ← get_local h,
t ← infer_type H,
match t with
| `(%%l = %%r) := do
ltp ← infer_type l,
mv ← mk_mvar,
to_expr ``(congr_arg (%%e : %%ltp → %%mv) %%H) >>= note h,
clear H
| _ := skip
end,
-- let's try to force β-reduction at `h`
try (tactic.interactive.dsimp tt [] [] (loc.ns [h])
{eta := false, beta := true})
} <|> fail ("failed to apply " ++ to_string e ++ " at " ++ to_string h)
namespace tactic.interactive
/--
Apply a function to some local assumptions which are either equalities
or inequalities. For instance, if the context contains `h : a = b` and
some function `f` then `apply_fun f at h` turns `h` into
`h : f a = f b`. When the assumption is an inequality `h : a ≤ b`, a side
goal `monotone f` is created, unless this condition is provided using
`apply_fun f at h using P` where `P : monotone f`, or the `mono` tactic
can prove it.
Typical usage is:
```lean
open function
example (X Y Z : Type) (f : X → Y) (g : Y → Z) (H : injective $ g ∘ f) :
injective f :=
begin
intros x x' h,
apply_fun g at h,
exact H h
end
```
-/
meta def apply_fun (q : parse texpr) (locs : parse location)
(lem : parse (tk "using" *> texpr)?) : tactic unit :=
--do e ← tactic.i_to_expr q,
match locs with
| (loc.ns l) := do
l.mmap' (λ l, match l with
| some h := apply_fun_name q h lem
| none := skip
end)
| wildcard := do ctx ← local_context,
ctx.mmap' (λ h, apply_fun_name q h.local_pp_name lem)
end
end tactic.interactive
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "apply_fun",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.apply_fun],
tags := ["context management"] }
open function
example (X Y Z : Type) (f : X → Y) (g : Y → Z) (H : injective $ g ∘ f) :
injective f :=
begin
intros x x' h,
apply_fun g at h,
exact H h
end |
db16ccd1a460a218fe0b822b945c605631c4446c | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/724.lean | c5f7495f51e6f3ba8b170bd83794973ea1dba4a2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 539 | lean | import data.list
open list bool nat
definition filter {A} : list A → (A → bool) → list A
| filter [] p := []
| filter (a :: l) p :=
match p a with
| tt := a :: filter l p
| ff := filter l p
end
example : list ℕ := filter [0, 3, 7, 2, 4, 6, 3, 4]
(λ(n : ℕ), begin induction n, exact tt, induction v_0, exact tt, exact ff end)
definition foo : list ℕ := filter [0, 3, 7, 2, 4, 6, 3, 4]
(λ(n : ℕ), begin induction n, exact tt, induction v_0, exact tt, exact ff end)
example : foo = [0, 2, 4, 6, 4] := rfl
|
fb8194fe8d0b1358715d8d1b0d89b83ca1553929 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/apply_class_issue0.lean | 48cb99c4b3ab5361f53336f4b266d972bb96ff94 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 179 | lean | structure is_trunc [class] (A : Type) : Type
theorem foo (A : Type) [H : is_trunc A] (B : Type) : B := sorry
theorem bar [H : is_trunc false] : false :=
by apply (@foo false _)
|
a3d2620d3872e5c4b7939a077d371caa1da6e172 | 4034f8da6f54c838133a7ab6a8c0c61086c9c949 | /src/bundles_old.lean | 4d3aee152e0d6e4644b3e8cc68fb8a40eba1c440 | [] | no_license | mguaypaq/lean-topology | f9e6c69e2b85cca1377ee89d75c65bd384225170 | 57b15b3862d441095e254e65009856fa922758cc | refs/heads/main | 1,691,451,271,943 | 1,631,647,691,000 | 1,631,647,691,000 | 398,682,545 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,950 | lean | import tactic
import .topology
import .gluing
import .fiber_product
section fiber_space
variables {E E' B : Type} (π' : E' → B) (φ : E → E')
def res_base (U : set B) :
φ ⁻¹' (π' ⁻¹' U) → π' ⁻¹' U :=
subtype.map φ (by simp)
@[simp]
lemma res_base_def (U : set B)
(a : E) (ha : a ∈ φ ⁻¹' (π' ⁻¹' U)) :
res_base _ _ U ⟨a, ha⟩ = ⟨φ a, ha⟩ := rfl
lemma from_sub_res_image_of_to_sub
(U : set B) (V : set E) :
from_sub _ ((res_base π' φ U) '' (to_sub _ V)) =
(π' ⁻¹' U) ∩ (φ '' V) :=
begin
ext e', simp, split,
rintro ⟨e'', he'', ⟨e, he⟩, he12⟩, rw he12 at *,
exact ⟨he'', ⟨e, he.1, he.2.2⟩⟩,
rintro ⟨he', e, he1, he2⟩, use e', split, exact he', use e,
simp [he2], exact ⟨he1, he'⟩,
end
lemma from_sub_res_preimage_of_to_sub
(U : set B) (V : set E') :
from_sub _ ((res_base π' φ U) ⁻¹' (to_sub _ V)) =
φ ⁻¹' ((π' ⁻¹' U) ∩ V) :=
begin
unfold from_sub, unfold to_sub, unfold res_base,
ext e, simp, split,
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩, rw ← hx.2.2, exact ⟨hx.1, hx.2.1⟩,
intro h, use e, simp, exact h,
end
lemma res_base_inj_of_inj
(hφ_inj : function.injective φ) (U : set B) :
function.injective (res_base π' φ U) :=
begin
apply subtype.map_injective, exact hφ_inj,
end
lemma res_base_surj_of_surj
(hφ_surj : function.surjective φ) (U : set B) :
function.surjective (res_base π' φ U) :=
begin
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩, obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hφ_surj x,
use y, simp, rwa hy,
simp, exact hy,
end
lemma res_base_bij_of_bij
(hφ_bij : function.bijective φ) (U : set B) :
function.bijective (res_base π' φ U) :=
begin
split,
apply res_base_inj_of_inj _ _ hφ_bij.1,
apply res_base_surj_of_surj _ _ hφ_bij.2,
end
variables {I : Type} (U : cover I B)
lemma fiber_map_inj_iff_cover_inj :
function.injective φ ↔
∀ i, function.injective (res_base π' φ (U i)) :=
begin
split,
intros hφ_inj i, apply res_base_inj_of_inj, exact hφ_inj,
intros hφ_inj_cover e1 e2 he,
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := U.hx (π' (φ e1)),
specialize @hφ_inj_cover i ⟨e1, hi⟩ ⟨e2, by rwa he at hi⟩,
simp at hφ_inj_cover, exact hφ_inj_cover he,
end
lemma fiber_map_surj_iff_cover_surj :
function.surjective φ ↔
∀ i, function.surjective (res_base π' φ (U i)) :=
begin
split,
intros hφ_surj i, apply res_base_surj_of_surj, exact hφ_surj,
intro hφ_surj_cover, intro e',
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := U.hx (π' e'),
obtain ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ha'⟩ := hφ_surj_cover i ⟨e', hi⟩,
use a, simp at ha', exact ha',
end
lemma fiber_map_bij_iff_cover_bij :
function.bijective φ ↔
∀ i, function.bijective (res_base π' φ (U i)) :=
begin
unfold function.bijective,
rw forall_and_distrib,
rw ← fiber_map_inj_iff_cover_inj,
rw ← fiber_map_surj_iff_cover_surj,
end
section fiber_bundle
open topology
variables [topology B] [topology E] [topology E']
{J : Type} (V : open_cover J B)
lemma res_base_cts_of_cts
(hπ'_cts : cts π') (hφ_cts : cts φ) (U ∈ opens B) :
cts (res_base π' φ U) :=
subtype_map_cts hφ_cts
lemma fiber_map_cts_iff_cover_cts
(hπ_cts : cts (π' ∘ φ)) (hπ'_cts : cts π') :
cts φ ↔
∀ j, cts (res_base π' φ (V j)) :=
begin
split,
intros hφ_cts j,
apply res_base_cts_of_cts _ _ hπ'_cts hφ_cts _ (V.hopen j),
intros hφ_cts_cover,
rw cts_iff_ptwise_cts, intros e W hW heW, simp,
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := V.hx (π' (φ e)),
use φ ⁻¹' (π' ⁻¹' (V j) ∩ W),
split, -- proof of openness
specialize hφ_cts_cover j (to_sub _ W),
rw to_sub_open_iff at hφ_cts_cover,
specialize hφ_cts_cover ⟨W, hW, rfl⟩,
rw from_sub_open_iff at hφ_cts_cover,
rwa ← from_sub_res_preimage_of_to_sub,
rw ←set.preimage_comp,
apply hπ_cts, exact V.hopen j,
split, simp, simp, exact ⟨hj, heW⟩,
end
lemma res_base_open_map_of_open_map
(hπ_cts : cts (π' ∘ φ)) (hπ'_cts : cts π')
(hφ_open : open_map φ)
(U ∈ opens B) :
open_map (res_base π' φ U) :=
begin
apply subtype_map_open, exact hφ_open,
change ((π' ∘ φ) ⁻¹' U ∈ opens E), apply hπ_cts, exact ‹U ∈ opens B›,
end
lemma fiber_map_open_map_iff_res_open_map
(hπ_cts : cts (π' ∘ φ)) (hπ'_cts : cts π') :
open_map φ ↔
∀ j, open_map (res_base π' φ (V j)) :=
begin
split,
intros hφ_open j,
apply res_base_open_map_of_open_map _ _ hπ_cts hπ'_cts hφ_open _ (V.hopen j),
intros hφ_open_map W hW,
rw subset_open_iff_open_cover (pullback_open_cover π' hπ'_cts V),
intro j, change π' ⁻¹' (V j) ∩ φ '' W ∈ opens E',
specialize hφ_open_map j (to_sub _ W),
rw to_sub_open_iff at hφ_open_map,
specialize hφ_open_map ⟨W, hW, rfl⟩,
rw from_sub_open_iff at hφ_open_map,
rwa ← from_sub_res_image_of_to_sub,
apply hπ'_cts, exact V.hopen j,
end
lemma res_base_homeo_of_homeo
(hπ_cts : cts (π' ∘ φ)) (hπ'_cts : cts π')
(hφ_homeo : homeo φ)
(U ∈ opens B) :
homeo (res_base π' φ U) :=
begin
rw homeo_iff at *,
split,
exact res_base_cts_of_cts _ _ hπ'_cts hφ_homeo.1 U ‹U ∈ opens B›,
split,
exact res_base_bij_of_bij _ _ hφ_homeo.2.1 U,
exact res_base_open_map_of_open_map _ _ hπ_cts hπ'_cts hφ_homeo.2.2 U ‹U ∈ opens B›,
end
lemma fiber_map_homeo_iff_res_homeo
(hπ_cts : cts (π' ∘ φ)) (hπ'_cts : cts π') :
homeo φ ↔
∀ j, homeo (res_base π' φ (V j)) :=
begin
split, intros hφ_homeo j,
exact res_base_homeo_of_homeo _ _ hπ_cts hπ'_cts hφ_homeo (V j) (V.hopen j),
intro hφ_homeo,
rw [homeo_iff,
fiber_map_cts_iff_cover_cts _ _ V hπ_cts hπ'_cts,
fiber_map_bij_iff_cover_bij _ _ V.to_cover,
fiber_map_open_map_iff_res_open_map _ _ V hπ_cts hπ'_cts,
← forall_and_distrib, ← forall_and_distrib],
intro j, specialize hφ_homeo j, rwa homeo_iff at hφ_homeo,
end
end fiber_bundle
end fiber_space |
0a0751f6c69d4a32ca8202a595da2bbd41a88de6 | 8cb37a089cdb4af3af9d8bf1002b417e407a8e9e | /library/init/meta/lean/parser.lean | 6dcf52c8befba15125977830941077051efb044f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/lean | ae3c3db4bb462d750dbf7419b28bafb3ec983ef7 | ed1788fd674bb8991acffc8fca585ec746711928 | refs/heads/master | 1,620,983,366,617 | 1,618,937,600,000 | 1,618,937,600,000 | 359,886,396 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,936,987,000 | 1,618,936,987,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,261 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic init.meta.has_reflect init.control.alternative
namespace lean
-- TODO: make inspectable (and pure)
meta constant parser_state : Type
meta constant parser_state.env : parser_state → environment
meta constant parser_state.options : parser_state → options
meta constant parser_state.cur_pos : parser_state → pos
@[reducible] meta def parser := interaction_monad parser_state
@[reducible] meta def parser_result := interaction_monad.result parser_state
open interaction_monad
open interaction_monad.result
namespace parser
variable {α : Type}
meta def val (p : lean.parser (reflected_value α)) : lean.parser α :=
reflected_value.val <$> p
protected meta class reflectable (p : parser α) :=
(full : parser (reflected_value α))
namespace reflectable
meta def expr {p : parser α} (r : reflectable p) : parser expr :=
reflected_value.expr <$> r.full
meta def to_parser {p : parser α} (r : reflectable p) : parser α :=
val r.full
end reflectable
meta def get_env : parser environment :=
λ s, success s.env s
meta constant set_env : environment → parser unit
/-- Make sure the next token is an identifier, consume it, and
produce the quoted name `t, where t is the identifier. -/
meta constant ident : parser name
/-- Make sure the next token is a small nat, consume it, and produce it -/
meta constant small_nat : parser nat
/-- Check that the next token is `tk` and consume it. `tk` must be a registered token. -/
meta constant tk (tk : string) : parser unit
/-- Parse an unelaborated expression using the given right-binding power.
When `pat := tt`, the expression is parsed as a pattern, i.e. local
constants are not checked. -/
protected meta constant pexpr (rbp := std.prec.max) (pat := ff) : parser pexpr
/-- a variable to local scope -/
meta constant add_local (v: expr) : parser unit
meta constant add_local_level (v: name) : parser unit
meta constant list_include_var_names : parser (list name)
meta constant list_available_include_vars : parser (list expr)
meta constant include_var : name → parser unit
meta constant omit_var : name → parser unit
meta constant push_local_scope : parser unit
meta constant pop_local_scope : parser unit
/--
Run the parser in a local declaration scope.
Local declarations added via `add_local` do not propagate outside of this scope.
-/
@[inline]
meta def with_local_scope {α} (p : parser α) : parser α :=
interaction_monad.bracket push_local_scope p pop_local_scope
protected meta constant itactic_reflected : parser (reflected_value (tactic unit))
/-- Parse an interactive tactic block: `begin` .. `end` -/
@[reducible] protected meta def itactic : parser (tactic unit) := val parser.itactic_reflected
/-- Do not report info from content parsed by `p`. -/
meta constant skip_info (p : parser α) : parser α
/-- Set goal info position of content parsed by `p` to current position. Nested calls take precedence. -/
meta constant set_goal_info_pos (p : parser α) : parser α
/-- Return the current parser position without consuming any input. -/
meta def cur_pos : parser pos := λ s, success (parser_state.cur_pos s) s
/-- Temporarily replace input of the parser state, run `p`, and return remaining input. -/
meta constant with_input (p : parser α) (input : string) : parser (α × string)
/-- Parse a top-level command. -/
meta constant command_like : parser unit
meta def parser_orelse (p₁ p₂ : parser α) : parser α :=
λ s,
let pos₁ := parser_state.cur_pos s in
result.cases_on (p₁ s)
success
(λ e₁ ref₁ s',
let pos₂ := parser_state.cur_pos s' in
if pos₁ ≠ pos₂ then
exception e₁ ref₁ s'
else result.cases_on (p₂ s)
success
exception)
meta instance : alternative parser :=
{ failure := @interaction_monad.failed _,
orelse := @parser_orelse,
..interaction_monad.monad }
-- TODO: move
meta def {u v} many {f : Type u → Type v} [monad f] [alternative f] {a : Type u} : f a → f (list a)
| x := (do y ← x,
ys ← many x,
return $ y::ys) <|> pure list.nil
local postfix `?`:100 := optional
local postfix `*`:100 := many
meta def sep_by : parser unit → parser α → parser (list α)
| s p := (list.cons <$> p <*> (s *> p)*) <|> return []
meta constant of_tactic : tactic α → parser α
meta instance : has_coe (tactic α) (parser α) :=
⟨of_tactic⟩
namespace reflectable
meta instance cast (p : lean.parser (reflected_value α)) : reflectable (val p) :=
{full := p}
meta instance has_reflect [r : has_reflect α] (p : lean.parser α) : reflectable p :=
{full := do rp ← p, return ⟨rp⟩}
meta instance optional {α : Type} [reflected α] (p : parser α)
[r : reflectable p] : reflectable (optional p) :=
{full := reflected_value.subst some <$> r.full <|> return ⟨none⟩}
end reflectable
meta def reflect (p : parser α) [r : reflectable p] : parser expr :=
r.expr
meta constant run {α} : parser α → tactic α
meta def run_with_input {α} : parser α → string → tactic α := λ p s,
prod.fst <$> run (with_input p s)
end parser
end lean
|
0551324bd8e0553d664928c21523c24b6f214db2 | 022547453607c6244552158ff25ab3bf17361760 | /src/data/sym2.lean | 22fb434b9f49f99cebb2741cbeb91f66bddf72c5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 1293045656/mathlib | 5f81741a7c1ff1873440ec680b3680bfb6b7b048 | 4709e61525a60189733e72a50e564c58d534bed8 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,010,200,553 | 1,626,245,646,000 | 1,626,245,646,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,748 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import tactic.linarith
import data.sym
/-!
# The symmetric square
This file defines the symmetric square, which is `α × α` modulo
swapping. This is also known as the type of unordered pairs.
More generally, the symmetric square is the second symmetric power
(see `data.sym`). The equivalence is `sym2.equiv_sym`.
From the point of view that an unordered pair is equivalent to a
multiset of cardinality two (see `sym2.equiv_multiset`), there is a
`has_mem` instance `sym2.mem`, which is a `Prop`-valued membership
test. Given `h : a ∈ z` for `z : sym2 α`, then `h.other` is the other
element of the pair, defined using `classical.choice`. If `α` has
decidable equality, then `h.other'` computably gives the other element.
Recall that an undirected graph (allowing self loops, but no multiple
edges) is equivalent to a symmetric relation on the vertex type `α`.
Given a symmetric relation on `α`, the corresponding edge set is
constructed by `sym2.from_rel`.
## Notation
The symmetric square has a setoid instance, so `⟦(a, b)⟧` denotes a
term of the symmetric square.
## Tags
symmetric square, unordered pairs, symmetric powers
-/
open function
open sym
universe u
variables {α : Type u}
namespace sym2
/--
This is the relation capturing the notion of pairs equivalent up to permutations.
-/
inductive rel (α : Type u) : (α × α) → (α × α) → Prop
| refl (x y : α) : rel (x, y) (x, y)
| swap (x y : α) : rel (x, y) (y, x)
attribute [refl] rel.refl
@[symm] lemma rel.symm {x y : α × α} : rel α x y → rel α y x :=
by rintro ⟨_, _⟩; constructor
@[trans] lemma rel.trans {x y z : α × α} : rel α x y → rel α y z → rel α x z :=
by { intros a b, cases_matching* rel _ _ _; apply rel.refl <|> apply rel.swap }
lemma rel.is_equivalence : equivalence (rel α) := by tidy; apply rel.trans; assumption
instance rel.setoid (α : Type u) : setoid (α × α) := ⟨rel α, rel.is_equivalence⟩
end sym2
/--
`sym2 α` is the symmetric square of `α`, which, in other words, is the
type of unordered pairs.
It is equivalent in a natural way to multisets of cardinality 2 (see
`sym2.equiv_multiset`).
-/
@[reducible]
def sym2 (α : Type u) := quotient (sym2.rel.setoid α)
namespace sym2
lemma eq_swap {a b : α} : ⟦(a, b)⟧ = ⟦(b, a)⟧ :=
by { rw quotient.eq, apply rel.swap }
lemma congr_right {a b c : α} : ⟦(a, b)⟧ = ⟦(a, c)⟧ ↔ b = c :=
by { split; intro h, { rw quotient.eq at h, cases h; refl }, rw h }
lemma congr_left {a b c : α} : ⟦(b, a)⟧ = ⟦(c, a)⟧ ↔ b = c :=
by { split; intro h, { rw quotient.eq at h, cases h; refl }, rw h }
/--
The functor `sym2` is functorial, and this function constructs the induced maps.
-/
def map {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : sym2 α → sym2 β :=
quotient.map (prod.map f f)
(by { rintros _ _ h, cases h, { refl }, apply rel.swap })
@[simp]
lemma map_id : sym2.map (@id α) = id := by tidy
lemma map_comp {α β γ : Type*} {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} :
sym2.map (g ∘ f) = sym2.map g ∘ sym2.map f := by tidy
@[simp]
lemma map_pair_eq {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (x y : α) : map f ⟦(x, y)⟧ = ⟦(f x, f y)⟧ :=
by simp [map]
section membership
/-! ### Declarations about membership -/
/--
This is a predicate that determines whether a given term is a member of a term of the
symmetric square. From this point of view, the symmetric square is the subtype of
cardinality-two multisets on `α`.
-/
def mem (x : α) (z : sym2 α) : Prop :=
∃ (y : α), z = ⟦(x, y)⟧
instance : has_mem α (sym2 α) := ⟨mem⟩
lemma mk_has_mem (x y : α) : x ∈ ⟦(x, y)⟧ := ⟨y, rfl⟩
lemma mk_has_mem_right (x y : α) : y ∈ ⟦(x, y)⟧ := by { rw eq_swap, apply mk_has_mem }
/--
Given an element of the unordered pair, give the other element using `classical.some`.
See also `mem.other'` for the computable version.
-/
noncomputable def mem.other {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : α :=
classical.some h
@[simp]
lemma mem_other_spec {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : ⟦(a, h.other)⟧ = z :=
by erw ← classical.some_spec h
lemma eq_iff {x y z w : α} :
⟦(x, y)⟧ = ⟦(z, w)⟧ ↔ (x = z ∧ y = w) ∨ (x = w ∧ y = z) :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw quotient.eq at h, cases h; tidy },
{ cases h; rw [h.1, h.2], rw eq_swap }
end
@[simp] lemma mem_iff {a b c : α} : a ∈ ⟦(b, c)⟧ ↔ a = b ∨ a = c :=
{ mp := by { rintro ⟨_, h⟩, rw eq_iff at h, tidy },
mpr := by { rintro ⟨_⟩; subst a, { apply mk_has_mem }, apply mk_has_mem_right } }
lemma mem_other_mem {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) :
h.other ∈ z :=
by { convert mk_has_mem_right a h.other, rw mem_other_spec h }
lemma elems_iff_eq {x y : α} {z : sym2 α} (hne : x ≠ y) :
x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z ↔ z = ⟦(x, y)⟧ :=
begin
split,
{ refine quotient.rec_on_subsingleton z _,
rintros ⟨z₁, z₂⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩,
rw eq_iff,
cases mem_iff.mp hx with hx hx; cases mem_iff.mp hy with hy hy; cc },
{ rintro rfl, simp },
end
@[ext]
lemma sym2_ext (z z' : sym2 α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ z ↔ x ∈ z') : z = z' :=
begin
refine quotient.rec_on_subsingleton z (λ w, _) h,
refine quotient.rec_on_subsingleton z' (λ w', _),
intro h,
cases w with x y, cases w' with x' y',
simp only [mem_iff] at h,
apply eq_iff.mpr,
have hx := h x, have hy := h y, have hx' := h x', have hy' := h y',
simp only [true_iff, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, iff_true, or_true] at hx hy hx' hy',
cases hx; subst x; cases hy; subst y; cases hx'; try { subst x' }; cases hy'; try { subst y' };
cc,
end
instance mem.decidable [decidable_eq α] (x : α) (z : sym2 α) : decidable (x ∈ z) :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton z (λ ⟨y₁, y₂⟩, decidable_of_iff' _ mem_iff)
end membership
/--
A type `α` is naturally included in the diagonal of `α × α`, and this function gives the image
of this diagonal in `sym2 α`.
-/
def diag (x : α) : sym2 α := ⟦(x, x)⟧
/--
A predicate for testing whether an element of `sym2 α` is on the diagonal.
-/
def is_diag (z : sym2 α) : Prop := z ∈ set.range (@diag α)
@[simp]
lemma diag_is_diag (a : α) : is_diag (diag a) :=
by use a
@[simp]
lemma is_diag_iff_proj_eq (z : α × α) : is_diag ⟦z⟧ ↔ z.1 = z.2 :=
begin
cases z with a, split,
{ rintro ⟨_, h⟩, dsimp only, erw eq_iff at h, rcases h; cc },
{ rintro ⟨⟩, use a, refl },
end
instance is_diag.decidable_pred (α : Type u) [decidable_eq α] : decidable_pred (@is_diag α) :=
by { refine λ z, quotient.rec_on_subsingleton z (λ a, _), erw is_diag_iff_proj_eq, apply_instance }
lemma mem_other_ne {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (hd : ¬is_diag z) (h : a ∈ z) : h.other ≠ a :=
begin
intro hn, apply hd,
have h' := sym2.mem_other_spec h,
rw hn at h',
rw ←h',
simp,
end
section relations
/-! ### Declarations about symmetric relations -/
variables {r : α → α → Prop}
/--
Symmetric relations define a set on `sym2 α` by taking all those pairs
of elements that are related.
-/
def from_rel (sym : symmetric r) : set (sym2 α) :=
quotient.lift (uncurry r) (by { rintros _ _ ⟨_, _⟩, tidy })
@[simp]
lemma from_rel_proj_prop {sym : symmetric r} {z : α × α} :
⟦z⟧ ∈ from_rel sym ↔ r z.1 z.2 := iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma from_rel_prop {sym : symmetric r} {a b : α} :
⟦(a, b)⟧ ∈ from_rel sym ↔ r a b := by simp only [from_rel_proj_prop]
lemma from_rel_irreflexive {sym : symmetric r} :
irreflexive r ↔ ∀ {z}, z ∈ from_rel sym → ¬is_diag z :=
{ mp := by { intros h z hr hd, induction z,
erw is_diag_iff_proj_eq at hd, erw from_rel_proj_prop at hr, tidy },
mpr := by { intros h x hr, rw ← @from_rel_prop _ _ sym at hr, exact h hr ⟨x, rfl⟩ }}
lemma mem_from_rel_irrefl_other_ne {sym : symmetric r} (irrefl : irreflexive r)
{a : α} {z : sym2 α} (hz : z ∈ from_rel sym) (h : a ∈ z) : h.other ≠ a :=
mem_other_ne (from_rel_irreflexive.mp irrefl hz) h
instance from_rel.decidable_pred (sym : symmetric r) [h : decidable_rel r] :
decidable_pred (∈ sym2.from_rel sym) :=
λ z, quotient.rec_on_subsingleton z (λ x, h _ _)
end relations
section sym_equiv
/-! ### Equivalence to the second symmetric power -/
local attribute [instance] vector.perm.is_setoid
private def from_vector {α : Type*} : vector α 2 → α × α
| ⟨[a, b], h⟩ := (a, b)
private lemma perm_card_two_iff {α : Type*} {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} :
[a₁, b₁].perm [a₂, b₂] ↔ (a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂) ∨ (a₁ = b₂ ∧ b₁ = a₂) :=
{ mp := by { simp [← multiset.coe_eq_coe, ← multiset.cons_coe, multiset.cons_eq_cons]; tidy },
mpr := by { intro h, cases h; rw [h.1, h.2], apply list.perm.swap', refl } }
/--
The symmetric square is equivalent to length-2 vectors up to permutations.
-/
def sym2_equiv_sym' {α : Type*} : equiv (sym2 α) (sym' α 2) :=
{ to_fun := quotient.map
(λ (x : α × α), ⟨[x.1, x.2], rfl⟩)
(by { rintros _ _ ⟨_⟩, { refl }, apply list.perm.swap', refl }),
inv_fun := quotient.map from_vector (begin
rintros ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h,
cases x with _ x, { simpa using hx, },
cases x with _ x, { simpa using hx, },
cases x with _ x, swap, { exfalso, simp at hx, linarith [hx] },
cases y with _ y, { simpa using hy, },
cases y with _ y, { simpa using hy, },
cases y with _ y, swap, { exfalso, simp at hy, linarith [hy] },
rcases perm_card_two_iff.mp h with ⟨rfl,rfl⟩|⟨rfl,rfl⟩, { refl },
apply sym2.rel.swap,
end),
left_inv := by tidy,
right_inv := λ x, begin
refine quotient.rec_on_subsingleton x (λ x, _),
{ cases x with x hx,
cases x with _ x, { simpa using hx, },
cases x with _ x, { simpa using hx, },
cases x with _ x, swap, { exfalso, simp at hx, linarith [hx] },
refl },
end }
/--
The symmetric square is equivalent to the second symmetric power.
-/
def equiv_sym (α : Type*) : sym2 α ≃ sym α 2 :=
equiv.trans sym2_equiv_sym' sym_equiv_sym'.symm
/--
The symmetric square is equivalent to multisets of cardinality
two. (This is currently a synonym for `equiv_sym`, but it's provided
in case the definition for `sym` changes.)
-/
def equiv_multiset (α : Type*) : sym2 α ≃ {s : multiset α // s.card = 2} :=
equiv_sym α
end sym_equiv
section decidable
/--
An algorithm for computing `sym2.rel`.
-/
def rel_bool [decidable_eq α] (x y : α × α) : bool :=
if x.1 = y.1 then x.2 = y.2 else
if x.1 = y.2 then x.2 = y.1 else ff
lemma rel_bool_spec [decidable_eq α] (x y : α × α) :
↥(rel_bool x y) ↔ rel α x y :=
begin
cases x with x₁ x₂, cases y with y₁ y₂,
dsimp [rel_bool], split_ifs;
simp only [false_iff, bool.coe_sort_ff, bool.of_to_bool_iff],
rotate 2, { contrapose! h, cases h; cc },
all_goals { subst x₁, split; intro h1,
{ subst h1; apply sym2.rel.swap },
{ cases h1; cc } }
end
/--
Given `[decidable_eq α]` and `[fintype α]`, the following instance gives `fintype (sym2 α)`.
-/
instance (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] : decidable_rel (sym2.rel α) :=
λ x y, decidable_of_bool (rel_bool x y) (rel_bool_spec x y)
/--
A function that gives the other element of a pair given one of the elements. Used in `mem.other'`.
-/
private def pair_other [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (z : α × α) : α := if a = z.1 then z.2 else z.1
/--
Get the other element of the unordered pair using the decidable equality.
This is the computable version of `mem.other`.
-/
def mem.other' [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : α :=
quot.rec (λ x h', pair_other a x) (begin
clear h z,
intros x y h,
ext hy,
convert_to pair_other a x = _,
{ have h' : ∀ {c e h}, @eq.rec _ ⟦x⟧ (λ s, a ∈ s → α)
(λ _, pair_other a x) c e h = pair_other a x,
{ intros _ e _, subst e },
apply h', },
have h' := (rel_bool_spec x y).mpr h,
cases x with x₁ x₂, cases y with y₁ y₂,
cases mem_iff.mp hy with hy'; subst a; dsimp [rel_bool] at h';
split_ifs at h'; try { rw bool.of_to_bool_iff at h', subst x₁, subst x₂ }; dsimp [pair_other],
simp only [ne.symm h_1, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, if_false],
exfalso, exact bool.not_ff h',
simp only [h_1, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, if_false],
exfalso, exact bool.not_ff h',
end) z h
@[simp]
lemma mem_other_spec' [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) :
⟦(a, h.other')⟧ = z :=
begin
induction z, cases z with x y,
have h' := mem_iff.mp h,
dsimp [mem.other', quot.rec, pair_other],
cases h'; subst a,
{ simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true], refl, },
{ split_ifs, subst h_1, refl, rw eq_swap, refl, },
refl,
end
@[simp]
lemma other_eq_other' [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : h.other = h.other' :=
by rw [←congr_right, mem_other_spec' h, mem_other_spec]
lemma mem_other_mem' [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) :
h.other' ∈ z :=
by { rw ←other_eq_other', exact mem_other_mem h }
lemma other_invol' [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (ha : a ∈ z) (hb : ha.other' ∈ z):
hb.other' = a :=
begin
induction z, cases z with x y,
dsimp [mem.other', quot.rec, pair_other] at hb,
split_ifs at hb; dsimp [mem.other', quot.rec, pair_other],
simp only [h, if_true, eq_self_iff_true],
split_ifs, assumption, refl,
simp only [h, if_false, if_true, eq_self_iff_true],
cases mem_iff.mp ha; cc,
refl,
end
lemma other_invol {a : α} {z : sym2 α} (ha : a ∈ z) (hb : ha.other ∈ z):
hb.other = a :=
begin
classical,
rw other_eq_other' at hb ⊢,
convert other_invol' ha hb,
rw other_eq_other',
end
end decidable
end sym2
|
fc6988cbbe2442feaacb467d9efd872e878dbc97 | 1ff31b5610d384e194b838b2b59e9fb19ee6d857 | /examples/modus.lean | 7e82f26966060efb55d1c9b187d5dd8b19ba08df | [] | no_license | ratmice/lumpy-leandoc | fd8b530669937edda2c47504f8a2c496c9ad5cb1 | 2585ad6598112388aa23d670df970b388fee49c7 | refs/heads/master | 1,591,201,432,332 | 1,573,437,628,000 | 1,573,437,628,000 | 191,647,423 | 4 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,255 | lean | /-! Documentation header for lumpy-leandoc modus example.
This file requires fixes present in the lean community edition.
-/
variables {P Q : Prop}
/-- Modus Tollens
```latex
\begin{centering}
\begin{prooftree}
\AxiomC{P → Q}
\AxiomC{¬Q}
\BinaryInfC{¬P}
\end{prooftree}
\end{centering}
```
Example usage:
```lean
def impl_double_neg_intro {P Q : Prop} (_ : P → Q) : ¬¬P → ¬¬Q :=
λ (_ : ¬¬P) (_ : ¬Q),
have ¬Q → ¬P, from (modus_tollens ‹P → Q›),
have ¬P, from ‹¬Q → ¬P› ‹¬Q›,
show false, from ‹¬¬P› ‹¬P›
```
-/
def modus_tollens (_: P → Q) (_: ¬Q) : ¬P
:= assume _ : P,
show false, from ‹Q → false› (‹P → Q› ‹P›)
/-- Modus Ponens
```latex
\centering
\begin{prooftree}
\AxiomC{P → Q}
\AxiomC{P}
\BinaryInfC{Q}
\end{prooftree}
```-/
def modus_ponens (_ : P → Q) (_ : P) : Q
:= ‹P → Q› ‹P›
/-- Given a function from `P → Q` return a function from `¬¬P → ¬¬Q` -/
def impl_double_neg_intro {P Q : Prop} (_ : P → Q) : ¬¬P → ¬¬Q :=
λ (_ : ¬¬P) (_ : ¬Q),
have ¬Q → ¬P, from (modus_tollens ‹P → Q›),
have ¬P, from ‹¬Q → ¬P› ‹¬Q›,
‹¬¬P› ‹¬P›
|
564ed8ec1dac562b47dba6f4f3e395ed9da3bf58 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/category/Module/basic.lean | cddc4d34bed3eedcce4db1c86754c0bc9ab4509d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,417 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Robert A. Spencer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert A. Spencer, Markus Himmel
-/
import algebra.category.Group.basic
import category_theory.concrete_category
import category_theory.limits.shapes.kernels
import category_theory.linear
import linear_algebra.basic
/-!
# The category of `R`-modules
`Module.{v} R` is the category of bundled `R`-modules with carrier in the universe `v`. We show
that it is preadditive and show that being an isomorphism, monomorphism and epimorphism is
equivalent to being a linear equivalence, an injective linear map and a surjective linear map,
respectively.
## Implementation details
To construct an object in the category of `R`-modules from a type `M` with an instance of the
`module` typeclass, write `of R M`. There is a coercion in the other direction.
Similarly, there is a coercion from morphisms in `Module R` to linear maps.
Unfortunately, Lean is not smart enough to see that, given an object `M : Module R`, the expression
`of R M`, where we coerce `M` to the carrier type, is definitionally equal to `M` itself.
This means that to go the other direction, i.e., from linear maps/equivalences to (iso)morphisms
in the category of `R`-modules, we have to take care not to inadvertently end up with an
`of R M` where `M` is already an object. Hence, given `f : M →ₗ[R] N`,
* if `M N : Module R`, simply use `f`;
* if `M : Module R` and `N` is an unbundled `R`-module, use `↿f` or `as_hom_left f`;
* if `M` is an unbundled `R`-module and `N : Module R`, use `↾f` or `as_hom_right f`;
* if `M` and `N` are unbundled `R`-modules, use `↟f` or `as_hom f`.
Similarly, given `f : M ≃ₗ[R] N`, use `to_Module_iso`, `to_Module_iso'_left`, `to_Module_iso'_right`
or `to_Module_iso'`, respectively.
The arrow notations are localized, so you may have to `open_locale Module` to use them. Note that
the notation for `as_hom_left` clashes with the notation used to promote functions between types to
morphisms in the category `Type`, so to avoid confusion, it is probably a good idea to avoid having
the locales `Module` and `category_theory.Type` open at the same time.
If you get an error when trying to apply a theorem and the `convert` tactic produces goals of the
form `M = of R M`, then you probably used an incorrect variant of `as_hom` or `to_Module_iso`.
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
open category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair
universes v u
variables (R : Type u) [ring R]
/-- The category of R-modules and their morphisms.
Note that in the case of `R = ℤ`, we can not
impose here that the `ℤ`-multiplication field from the module structure is defeq to the one coming
from the `is_add_comm_group` structure (contrary to what we do for all module structures in
mathlib), which creates some difficulties down the road. -/
structure Module :=
(carrier : Type v)
[is_add_comm_group : add_comm_group carrier]
[is_module : module R carrier]
attribute [instance] Module.is_add_comm_group Module.is_module
namespace Module
instance : has_coe_to_sort (Module.{v} R) :=
{ S := Type v, coe := Module.carrier }
instance Module_category : category (Module.{v} R) :=
{ hom := λ M N, M →ₗ[R] N,
id := λ M, 1,
comp := λ A B C f g, g.comp f }
instance Module_concrete_category : concrete_category.{v} (Module.{v} R) :=
{ forget := { obj := λ R, R, map := λ R S f, (f : R → S) },
forget_faithful := { } }
instance has_forget_to_AddCommGroup : has_forget₂ (Module R) AddCommGroup :=
{ forget₂ :=
{ obj := λ M, AddCommGroup.of M,
map := λ M₁ M₂ f, linear_map.to_add_monoid_hom f } }
/-- The object in the category of R-modules associated to an R-module -/
def of (X : Type v) [add_comm_group X] [module R X] : Module R := ⟨X⟩
instance : has_zero (Module R) := ⟨of R punit⟩
instance : inhabited (Module R) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp]
lemma coe_of (X : Type u) [add_comm_group X] [module R X] : (of R X : Type u) = X := rfl
variables {R}
/-- Forgetting to the underlying type and then building the bundled object returns the original
module. -/
@[simps]
def of_self_iso (M : Module R) : Module.of R M ≅ M :=
{ hom := 𝟙 M, inv := 𝟙 M }
instance : subsingleton (of R punit) :=
by { rw coe_of R punit, apply_instance }
instance : has_zero_object (Module.{v} R) :=
{ zero := 0,
unique_to := λ X,
{ default := (0 : punit →ₗ[R] X),
uniq := λ _, linear_map.ext $ λ x,
have h : x = 0, from dec_trivial,
by simp only [h, linear_map.map_zero]},
unique_from := λ X,
{ default := (0 : X →ₗ[R] punit),
uniq := λ _, linear_map.ext $ λ x, dec_trivial } }
variables {R} {M N U : Module.{v} R}
@[simp] lemma id_apply (m : M) : (𝟙 M : M → M) m = m := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ U) :
((f ≫ g) : M → U) = g ∘ f := rfl
lemma comp_def (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ U) : f ≫ g = g.comp f := rfl
end Module
variables {R}
variables {X₁ X₂ : Type v}
/-- Reinterpreting a linear map in the category of `R`-modules. -/
def Module.as_hom [add_comm_group X₁] [module R X₁] [add_comm_group X₂] [module R X₂] :
(X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂) → (Module.of R X₁ ⟶ Module.of R X₂) := id
localized "notation `↟` f : 1024 := Module.as_hom f" in Module
/-- Reinterpreting a linear map in the category of `R`-modules. -/
def Module.as_hom_right [add_comm_group X₁] [module R X₁] {X₂ : Module.{v} R} :
(X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂) → (Module.of R X₁ ⟶ X₂) := id
localized "notation `↾` f : 1024 := Module.as_hom_right f" in Module
/-- Reinterpreting a linear map in the category of `R`-modules. -/
def Module.as_hom_left {X₁ : Module.{v} R} [add_comm_group X₂] [module R X₂] :
(X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂) → (X₁ ⟶ Module.of R X₂) := id
localized "notation `↿` f : 1024 := Module.as_hom_left f" in Module
/-- Build an isomorphism in the category `Module R` from a `linear_equiv` between `module`s. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.to_Module_iso
{g₁ : add_comm_group X₁} {g₂ : add_comm_group X₂} {m₁ : module R X₁} {m₂ : module R X₂}
(e : X₁ ≃ₗ[R] X₂) :
Module.of R X₁ ≅ Module.of R X₂ :=
{ hom := (e : X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂),
inv := (e.symm : X₂ →ₗ[R] X₁),
hom_inv_id' := begin ext, exact e.left_inv x, end,
inv_hom_id' := begin ext, exact e.right_inv x, end, }
/--
Build an isomorphism in the category `Module R` from a `linear_equiv` between `module`s.
This version is better than `linear_equiv_to_Module_iso` when applicable, because Lean can't see
`Module.of R M` is defeq to `M` when `M : Module R`. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.to_Module_iso' {M N : Module.{v} R} (i : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : M ≅ N :=
{ hom := i,
inv := i.symm,
hom_inv_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp,
inv_hom_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp }
/--
Build an isomorphism in the category `Module R` from a `linear_equiv` between `module`s.
This version is better than `linear_equiv_to_Module_iso` when applicable, because Lean can't see
`Module.of R M` is defeq to `M` when `M : Module R`. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.to_Module_iso'_left {X₁ : Module.{v} R} {g₂ : add_comm_group X₂} {m₂ : module R X₂}
(e : X₁ ≃ₗ[R] X₂) : X₁ ≅ Module.of R X₂ :=
{ hom := (e : X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂),
inv := (e.symm : X₂ →ₗ[R] X₁),
hom_inv_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp,
inv_hom_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp }
/--
Build an isomorphism in the category `Module R` from a `linear_equiv` between `module`s.
This version is better than `linear_equiv_to_Module_iso` when applicable, because Lean can't see
`Module.of R M` is defeq to `M` when `M : Module R`. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.to_Module_iso'_right {g₁ : add_comm_group X₁} {m₁ : module R X₁}
{X₂ : Module.{v} R} (e : X₁ ≃ₗ[R] X₂) : Module.of R X₁ ≅ X₂ :=
{ hom := (e : X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂),
inv := (e.symm : X₂ →ₗ[R] X₁),
hom_inv_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp,
inv_hom_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp }
namespace category_theory.iso
/-- Build a `linear_equiv` from an isomorphism in the category `Module R`. -/
@[simps]
def to_linear_equiv {X Y : Module R} (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃ₗ[R] Y :=
{ to_fun := i.hom,
inv_fun := i.inv,
left_inv := by tidy,
right_inv := by tidy,
map_add' := by tidy,
map_smul' := by tidy, }.
end category_theory.iso
/-- linear equivalences between `module`s are the same as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms
in `Module` -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv_iso_Module_iso {X Y : Type u} [add_comm_group X] [add_comm_group Y] [module R X]
[module R Y] :
(X ≃ₗ[R] Y) ≅ (Module.of R X ≅ Module.of R Y) :=
{ hom := λ e, e.to_Module_iso,
inv := λ i, i.to_linear_equiv, }
namespace Module
instance : preadditive (Module.{v} R) :=
{ add_comp' := λ P Q R f f' g,
show (f + f') ≫ g = f ≫ g + f' ≫ g, by { ext, simp },
comp_add' := λ P Q R f g g',
show f ≫ (g + g') = f ≫ g + f ≫ g', by { ext, simp } }
section
variables {S : Type u} [comm_ring S]
instance : linear S (Module.{v} S) :=
{ hom_module := λ X Y, linear_map.module,
smul_comp' := by { intros, ext, simp },
comp_smul' := by { intros, ext, simp }, }
end
end Module
instance (M : Type u) [add_comm_group M] [module R M] : has_coe (submodule R M) (Module R) :=
⟨ λ N, Module.of R N ⟩
|
1f90f2e1f6a9aa79a62b39d05da27b4dcc996eed | 2c096fdfecf64e46ea7bc6ce5521f142b5926864 | /tests/lean/levelNGen.lean | 46153e2075b2522d9bf012d570a831d4fd2ff0c8 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | Kha/lean4 | 1005785d2c8797ae266a303968848e5f6ce2fe87 | b99e11346948023cd6c29d248cd8f3e3fb3474cf | refs/heads/master | 1,693,355,498,027 | 1,669,080,461,000 | 1,669,113,138,000 | 184,748,176 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,665,995,520,000 | 1,556,884,930,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 203 | lean | opaque test1 {α : Sort _} : α → Sort u_1
#check @test1
def test2 {α : Sort _} : α → Sort u_1 := sorry
#check @test2
variable {α : Sort _} in theorem test3 : α → Sort _ := sorry
#check @test3
|
367376cea48c12e7a524a0241547b426500d5a41 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /test/transport/basic.lean | f25577c592bb63a4fff01660be01fed6b93d9a06 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,907 | lean | import tactic.transport
import order.bounded_lattice
import algebra.lie.basic
-- We verify that `transport` can move a `semiring` across an equivalence.
-- Note that we've never even mentioned the idea of addition or multiplication to `transport`.
def semiring.map {α : Type} [semiring α] {β : Type} (e : α ≃ β) : semiring β :=
by transport using e
-- Indeed, it can equally well move a `semilattice_sup_top`.
def sup_top.map {α : Type} [semilattice_sup_top α] {β : Type} (e : α ≃ β) : semilattice_sup_top β :=
by transport using e
-- Verify definitional equality of the new structure data.
example {α : Type} [semilattice_sup_top α] {β : Type} (e : α ≃ β) (x y : β) :
begin
haveI := sup_top.map e,
exact (x ≤ y) = (e.symm x ≤ e.symm y),
end :=
rfl
-- And why not Lie rings while we're at it?
def lie_ring.map {α : Type} [lie_ring α] {β : Type} (e : α ≃ β) : lie_ring β :=
by transport using e
-- Verify definitional equality of the new structure data.
example {α : Type} [lie_ring α] {β : Type} (e : α ≃ β) (x y : β) :
begin
haveI := lie_ring.map e,
exact ⁅x, y⁆ = e ⁅e.symm x, e.symm y⁆
end :=
rfl
-- Below we verify in more detail that the transported structure for `semiring`
-- is definitionally what you would hope for.
inductive mynat : Type
| zero : mynat
| succ : mynat → mynat
def mynat_equiv : ℕ ≃ mynat :=
{ to_fun := λ n, nat.rec_on n mynat.zero (λ n, mynat.succ),
inv_fun := λ n, mynat.rec_on n nat.zero (λ n, nat.succ),
left_inv := λ n, begin induction n, refl, exact congr_arg nat.succ n_ih, end,
right_inv := λ n, begin induction n, refl, exact congr_arg mynat.succ n_ih, end }
@[simp] lemma mynat_equiv_apply_zero : mynat_equiv 0 = mynat.zero := rfl
@[simp] lemma mynat_equiv_apply_succ (n : ℕ) :
mynat_equiv (n + 1) = mynat.succ (mynat_equiv n) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mynat_equiv_symm_apply_zero : mynat_equiv.symm mynat.zero = 0:= rfl
@[simp] lemma mynat_equiv_symm_apply_succ (n : mynat) :
mynat_equiv.symm (mynat.succ n) = (mynat_equiv.symm n) + 1 := rfl
instance semiring_mynat : semiring mynat :=
by transport (by apply_instance : semiring ℕ) using mynat_equiv
lemma mynat_add_def (a b : mynat) : a + b = mynat_equiv (mynat_equiv.symm a + mynat_equiv.symm b) :=
rfl
-- Verify that we can do computations with the transported structure.
example :
(mynat.succ (mynat.succ mynat.zero)) + (mynat.succ mynat.zero) =
(mynat.succ (mynat.succ (mynat.succ mynat.zero))) :=
rfl
lemma mynat_zero_def : (0 : mynat) = mynat_equiv 0 :=
rfl
lemma mynat_one_def : (1 : mynat) = mynat_equiv 1 :=
rfl
lemma mynat_mul_def (a b : mynat) : a * b = mynat_equiv (mynat_equiv.symm a * mynat_equiv.symm b) :=
rfl
example : (3 : mynat) + (7 : mynat) = (10 : mynat) :=
rfl
example : (2 : mynat) * (2 : mynat) = (4 : mynat) :=
rfl
example : (3 : mynat) + (7 : mynat) * (2 : mynat) = (17 : mynat) :=
rfl
|
e755c2fa0853aecd4f9d8d0d63f39ebe10e05b51 | d9d511f37a523cd7659d6f573f990e2a0af93c6f | /src/algebra/category/Module/basic.lean | 84871e1925330d142d486f6a2f43263e511ad657 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hikari0108/mathlib | b7ea2b7350497ab1a0b87a09d093ecc025a50dfa | a9e7d333b0cfd45f13a20f7b96b7d52e19fa2901 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,483,608,260 | 1,631,541,580,000 | 1,631,541,580,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,568 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Robert A. Spencer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert A. Spencer, Markus Himmel
-/
import algebra.category.Group.basic
import category_theory.concrete_category
import category_theory.limits.shapes.kernels
import category_theory.linear
import linear_algebra.basic
/-!
# The category of `R`-modules
`Module.{v} R` is the category of bundled `R`-modules with carrier in the universe `v`. We show
that it is preadditive and show that being an isomorphism, monomorphism and epimorphism is
equivalent to being a linear equivalence, an injective linear map and a surjective linear map,
respectively.
## Implementation details
To construct an object in the category of `R`-modules from a type `M` with an instance of the
`module` typeclass, write `of R M`. There is a coercion in the other direction.
Similarly, there is a coercion from morphisms in `Module R` to linear maps.
Unfortunately, Lean is not smart enough to see that, given an object `M : Module R`, the expression
`of R M`, where we coerce `M` to the carrier type, is definitionally equal to `M` itself.
This means that to go the other direction, i.e., from linear maps/equivalences to (iso)morphisms
in the category of `R`-modules, we have to take care not to inadvertently end up with an
`of R M` where `M` is already an object. Hence, given `f : M →ₗ[R] N`,
* if `M N : Module R`, simply use `f`;
* if `M : Module R` and `N` is an unbundled `R`-module, use `↿f` or `as_hom_left f`;
* if `M` is an unbundled `R`-module and `N : Module R`, use `↾f` or `as_hom_right f`;
* if `M` and `N` are unbundled `R`-modules, use `↟f` or `as_hom f`.
Similarly, given `f : M ≃ₗ[R] N`, use `to_Module_iso`, `to_Module_iso'_left`, `to_Module_iso'_right`
or `to_Module_iso'`, respectively.
The arrow notations are localized, so you may have to `open_locale Module` to use them. Note that
the notation for `as_hom_left` clashes with the notation used to promote functions between types to
morphisms in the category `Type`, so to avoid confusion, it is probably a good idea to avoid having
the locales `Module` and `category_theory.Type` open at the same time.
If you get an error when trying to apply a theorem and the `convert` tactic produces goals of the
form `M = of R M`, then you probably used an incorrect variant of `as_hom` or `to_Module_iso`.
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
open category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair
universes v u
variables (R : Type u) [ring R]
/-- The category of R-modules and their morphisms.
Note that in the case of `R = ℤ`, we can not
impose here that the `ℤ`-multiplication field from the module structure is defeq to the one coming
from the `is_add_comm_group` structure (contrary to what we do for all module structures in
mathlib), which creates some difficulties down the road. -/
structure Module :=
(carrier : Type v)
[is_add_comm_group : add_comm_group carrier]
[is_module : module R carrier]
attribute [instance] Module.is_add_comm_group Module.is_module
namespace Module
instance : has_coe_to_sort (Module.{v} R) :=
{ S := Type v, coe := Module.carrier }
instance Module_category : category (Module.{v} R) :=
{ hom := λ M N, M →ₗ[R] N,
id := λ M, 1,
comp := λ A B C f g, g.comp f,
id_comp' := λ X Y f, linear_map.id_comp _,
comp_id' := λ X Y f, linear_map.comp_id _,
assoc' := λ W X Y Z f g h, linear_map.comp_assoc _ _ _ }
instance Module_concrete_category : concrete_category.{v} (Module.{v} R) :=
{ forget := { obj := λ R, R, map := λ R S f, (f : R → S) },
forget_faithful := { } }
instance has_forget_to_AddCommGroup : has_forget₂ (Module R) AddCommGroup :=
{ forget₂ :=
{ obj := λ M, AddCommGroup.of M,
map := λ M₁ M₂ f, linear_map.to_add_monoid_hom f } }
/-- The object in the category of R-modules associated to an R-module -/
def of (X : Type v) [add_comm_group X] [module R X] : Module R := ⟨X⟩
instance : has_zero (Module R) := ⟨of R punit⟩
instance : inhabited (Module R) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp]
lemma coe_of (X : Type u) [add_comm_group X] [module R X] : (of R X : Type u) = X := rfl
variables {R}
/-- Forgetting to the underlying type and then building the bundled object returns the original
module. -/
@[simps]
def of_self_iso (M : Module R) : Module.of R M ≅ M :=
{ hom := 𝟙 M, inv := 𝟙 M }
instance : subsingleton (of R punit) :=
by { rw coe_of R punit, apply_instance }
instance : has_zero_object (Module.{v} R) :=
{ zero := 0,
unique_to := λ X,
{ default := (0 : punit →ₗ[R] X),
uniq := λ _, linear_map.ext $ λ x,
have h : x = 0, from dec_trivial,
by simp only [h, linear_map.map_zero]},
unique_from := λ X,
{ default := (0 : X →ₗ[R] punit),
uniq := λ _, linear_map.ext $ λ x, dec_trivial } }
variables {R} {M N U : Module.{v} R}
@[simp] lemma id_apply (m : M) : (𝟙 M : M → M) m = m := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_comp (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ U) :
((f ≫ g) : M → U) = g ∘ f := rfl
lemma comp_def (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ U) : f ≫ g = g.comp f := rfl
end Module
variables {R}
variables {X₁ X₂ : Type v}
/-- Reinterpreting a linear map in the category of `R`-modules. -/
def Module.as_hom [add_comm_group X₁] [module R X₁] [add_comm_group X₂] [module R X₂] :
(X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂) → (Module.of R X₁ ⟶ Module.of R X₂) := id
localized "notation `↟` f : 1024 := Module.as_hom f" in Module
/-- Reinterpreting a linear map in the category of `R`-modules. -/
def Module.as_hom_right [add_comm_group X₁] [module R X₁] {X₂ : Module.{v} R} :
(X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂) → (Module.of R X₁ ⟶ X₂) := id
localized "notation `↾` f : 1024 := Module.as_hom_right f" in Module
/-- Reinterpreting a linear map in the category of `R`-modules. -/
def Module.as_hom_left {X₁ : Module.{v} R} [add_comm_group X₂] [module R X₂] :
(X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂) → (X₁ ⟶ Module.of R X₂) := id
localized "notation `↿` f : 1024 := Module.as_hom_left f" in Module
/-- Build an isomorphism in the category `Module R` from a `linear_equiv` between `module`s. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.to_Module_iso
{g₁ : add_comm_group X₁} {g₂ : add_comm_group X₂} {m₁ : module R X₁} {m₂ : module R X₂}
(e : X₁ ≃ₗ[R] X₂) :
Module.of R X₁ ≅ Module.of R X₂ :=
{ hom := (e : X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂),
inv := (e.symm : X₂ →ₗ[R] X₁),
hom_inv_id' := begin ext, exact e.left_inv x, end,
inv_hom_id' := begin ext, exact e.right_inv x, end, }
/--
Build an isomorphism in the category `Module R` from a `linear_equiv` between `module`s.
This version is better than `linear_equiv_to_Module_iso` when applicable, because Lean can't see
`Module.of R M` is defeq to `M` when `M : Module R`. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.to_Module_iso' {M N : Module.{v} R} (i : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : M ≅ N :=
{ hom := i,
inv := i.symm,
hom_inv_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp,
inv_hom_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp }
/--
Build an isomorphism in the category `Module R` from a `linear_equiv` between `module`s.
This version is better than `linear_equiv_to_Module_iso` when applicable, because Lean can't see
`Module.of R M` is defeq to `M` when `M : Module R`. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.to_Module_iso'_left {X₁ : Module.{v} R} {g₂ : add_comm_group X₂} {m₂ : module R X₂}
(e : X₁ ≃ₗ[R] X₂) : X₁ ≅ Module.of R X₂ :=
{ hom := (e : X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂),
inv := (e.symm : X₂ →ₗ[R] X₁),
hom_inv_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp,
inv_hom_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp }
/--
Build an isomorphism in the category `Module R` from a `linear_equiv` between `module`s.
This version is better than `linear_equiv_to_Module_iso` when applicable, because Lean can't see
`Module.of R M` is defeq to `M` when `M : Module R`. -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv.to_Module_iso'_right {g₁ : add_comm_group X₁} {m₁ : module R X₁}
{X₂ : Module.{v} R} (e : X₁ ≃ₗ[R] X₂) : Module.of R X₁ ≅ X₂ :=
{ hom := (e : X₁ →ₗ[R] X₂),
inv := (e.symm : X₂ →ₗ[R] X₁),
hom_inv_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp,
inv_hom_id' := linear_map.ext $ λ x, by simp }
namespace category_theory.iso
/-- Build a `linear_equiv` from an isomorphism in the category `Module R`. -/
@[simps]
def to_linear_equiv {X Y : Module R} (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃ₗ[R] Y :=
{ to_fun := i.hom,
inv_fun := i.inv,
left_inv := by tidy,
right_inv := by tidy,
map_add' := by tidy,
map_smul' := by tidy, }.
end category_theory.iso
/-- linear equivalences between `module`s are the same as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms
in `Module` -/
@[simps]
def linear_equiv_iso_Module_iso {X Y : Type u} [add_comm_group X] [add_comm_group Y] [module R X]
[module R Y] :
(X ≃ₗ[R] Y) ≅ (Module.of R X ≅ Module.of R Y) :=
{ hom := λ e, e.to_Module_iso,
inv := λ i, i.to_linear_equiv, }
namespace Module
instance : preadditive (Module.{v} R) :=
{ add_comp' := λ P Q R f f' g,
show (f + f') ≫ g = f ≫ g + f' ≫ g, by { ext, simp },
comp_add' := λ P Q R f g g',
show f ≫ (g + g') = f ≫ g + f ≫ g', by { ext, simp } }
section
variables {S : Type u} [comm_ring S]
instance : linear S (Module.{v} S) :=
{ hom_module := λ X Y, linear_map.module,
smul_comp' := by { intros, ext, simp },
comp_smul' := by { intros, ext, simp }, }
end
end Module
instance (M : Type u) [add_comm_group M] [module R M] : has_coe (submodule R M) (Module R) :=
⟨ λ N, Module.of R N ⟩
|
fb53b4b6a5df3f98212a714ec1a545e2aaf04385 | 4efff1f47634ff19e2f786deadd394270a59ecd2 | /src/field_theory/normal.lean | 2b1b6a2cd98aa7f52a68960f7de6c739089dd28c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | agjftucker/mathlib | d634cd0d5256b6325e3c55bb7fb2403548371707 | 87fe50de17b00af533f72a102d0adefe4a2285e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,378,131,941 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 160,748,509 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,141,789,000 | 1,544,141,789,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,964 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import field_theory.minimal_polynomial
import field_theory.splitting_field
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
/-!
# Normal field extensions
In this file we define normal field extensions and prove that for a finite extension, being normal
is the same as being a splitting field (TODO).
## Main Definitions
- `normal F K` where `K` is a field extension of `F`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open polynomial
universes u v
variables (F : Type u) (K : Type v) [field F] [field K] [algebra F K]
/-- Typeclass for normal field extension: `K` is a normal extension of `F` iff the minimal
polynomial of every element `x` in `K` splits in `K`, i.e. every conjugate of `x` is in `K`. -/
@[class] def normal : Prop :=
∀ x : K, ∃ H : is_integral F x, splits (algebra_map F K) (minimal_polynomial H)
theorem normal.is_integral [h : normal F K] (x : K) : is_integral F x := (h x).fst
theorem normal.splits [h : normal F K] (x : K) :
splits (algebra_map F K) (minimal_polynomial $ normal.is_integral F K x) := (h x).snd
theorem normal.exists_is_splitting_field [normal F K] [finite_dimensional F K] :
∃ p : polynomial F, is_splitting_field F K p :=
begin
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := finite_dimensional.exists_is_basis_finset F K,
refine ⟨s.prod $ λ x, minimal_polynomial $ normal.is_integral F K x,
splits_prod _ $ λ x hx, normal.splits F K x,
subalgebra.to_submodule_injective _⟩,
rw [algebra.coe_top, eq_top_iff, ← hs.2, submodule.span_le, set.range_subset_iff],
refine λ x, algebra.subset_adjoin ((mem_roots $ mt (map_eq_zero $ algebra_map F K).1 $
finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.2 $ λ x hx, _).2 _),
{ exact minimal_polynomial.ne_zero _ },
rw [is_root.def, eval_map, ← aeval_def, alg_hom.map_prod],
exact finset.prod_eq_zero x.2 (minimal_polynomial.aeval _)
end
|
431f71f8460ebfd3f0fcc6e6a68caa1158af4c0f | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/1679.lean | 9dfa352584328445a92982e396a1f1bad01c83f6 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 275 | lean | @[elab_as_elim] theorem Eq.subst' {α} {motive : α → Prop} {a b : α} :
a = b → motive a → motive b := Eq.subst
example (P : α → Prop) {a b} (e : a = b) (h : P a) : P b :=
Eq.subst' e h
example (P : α → Prop) {a b} (e : a = b) (h : P a) : P b :=
e ▸ h
|
ef112d703a17bae2bd468c6bb65fa8974340edf3 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/set_theory/schroeder_bernstein_auto.lean | eaa474b075d1336c0b20f0c29fca0d2494a6efb4 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,004 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
The Schröder-Bernstein theorem, and well ordering of cardinals.
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.order.fixed_points
import Mathlib.order.zorn
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u v
namespace Mathlib
namespace function
namespace embedding
theorem schroeder_bernstein {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (hf : injective f)
(hg : injective g) : ∃ (h : α → β), bijective h :=
sorry
theorem antisymm {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : (α ↪ β) → (β ↪ α) → Nonempty (α ≃ β) := sorry
theorem min_injective {ι : Type u} {β : ι → Type v} (I : Nonempty ι) :
∃ (i : ι), Nonempty ((j : ι) → β i ↪ β j) :=
sorry
theorem total {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : Nonempty (α ↪ β) ∨ Nonempty (β ↪ α) := sorry
end Mathlib |
5236734497f87b72f2cfb3dc4a616377f5b8f551 | 0179bcdbf094a112437450a02dc2bdc8b2f921d4 | /fabstract/Wiles_A_and_Taylor_R_FermatLast/fabstract.lean | 3403cf3f649120465d10cbe57ff051816e56153e | [
"CC-BY-4.0"
] | permissive | haselwarter/formalabstracts | cf0c129fc086526cef1bd65d95c6f95a9a7ec5c8 | eab6d94850308df9f09d23f3a9a2f7b5ac5c6c7a | refs/heads/master | 1,609,515,992,248 | 1,500,418,815,000 | 1,500,418,815,000 | 97,696,544 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,500,455,350,000 | 1,500,455,350,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 637 | lean | import meta_data
namespace Wiles_A_and_Taylor_R_FermatLast
-- the statement of Fermat's Last Theorem
axiom fermat_last_theorem :
∀ (x y z n : nat), x > 0 → y > 0 → n > 2 → x ^ n + y ^ n ≠ z ^ n
definition fabstract : meta_data :=
{ authors := ["Andrew Wiles", "Richard Tylor"],
description := "A result in number theory conjectured by Pierre de Fermat and proved by Andrew Wiles and Richard Taylor. Coloquially referred to as Fermat Last Theorem.",
primary := cite.DOI "10.2307/2118559",
secondary := [cite.DOI "10.2307/2118560"],
results := [result.Proof fermat_last_theorem] }
end Wiles_A_and_Taylor_R_FermatLast
|
7d126636035e79114780127e4990bd234c3799ea | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/order/fixed_points.lean | 01262f26730d5ed076dc766e00c9ff7ee3c7d3ae | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,698 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau
-/
import order.complete_lattice
import dynamics.fixed_points.basic
/-!
# Fixed point construction on complete lattices
This file sets up the basic theory of fixed points of a monotone function in a complete lattice
## Main definitions
* `lfp`: The least fixed point of a monotone function.
* `gfp`: The greatest fixed point of a monotone function.
* `prev_fixed`: The least fixed point of a monotone function greater than a given element.
* `next_fixed`: The greatest fixed point of a monotone function smaller than a given element.
* `fixed_points.complete_lattice`: The Knaster-Tarski theorem: fixed points form themselves a
complete lattice.
## Tags
fixed point, complete lattice, monotone function
-/
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open function (fixed_points)
section fixedpoint
variables [complete_lattice α] {f : α → α}
/-- Least fixed point of a monotone function -/
def lfp (f : α → α) : α := Inf {a | f a ≤ a}
/-- Greatest fixed point of a monotone function -/
def gfp (f : α → α) : α := Sup {a | a ≤ f a}
lemma lfp_le {a : α} (h : f a ≤ a) : lfp f ≤ a :=
Inf_le h
lemma le_lfp {a : α} (h : ∀ b, f b ≤ b → a ≤ b) : a ≤ lfp f :=
le_Inf h
lemma lfp_fixed_point (hf : monotone f) : f (lfp f) = lfp f :=
have h : f (lfp f) ≤ lfp f,
from le_lfp (λ b hb, (hf (lfp_le hb)).trans hb),
h.antisymm (lfp_le (hf h))
lemma lfp_induction {p : α → Prop} (hf : monotone f) (step : ∀ a, p a → a ≤ lfp f → p (f a))
(hSup : ∀ s, (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → p (Sup s)) :
p (lfp f) :=
begin
let s := {a | a ≤ lfp f ∧ p a},
have hpSup := hSup s (λ a ha, ha.2),
have h : Sup s ≤ lfp f := le_lfp (λ a ha, Sup_le (λ b hb, hb.1.trans (lfp_le ha))),
rw ←h.antisymm (lfp_le (le_Sup ⟨(hf h).trans (lfp_fixed_point hf).le, step _ hpSup h⟩)),
exact hpSup,
end
lemma monotone_lfp : monotone (@lfp α _) :=
λ f g h, le_lfp $ λ a ha, lfp_le $ (h a).trans ha
lemma le_gfp {a : α} (h : a ≤ f a) : a ≤ gfp f :=
le_Sup h
lemma gfp_le {a : α} (h : ∀ b, b ≤ f b → b ≤ a) : gfp f ≤ a :=
Sup_le h
lemma gfp_fixed_point (hf : monotone f) : f (gfp f) = gfp f :=
have h : gfp f ≤ f (gfp f),
from gfp_le $ λ a ha, ha.trans (hf (le_gfp ha)),
(le_gfp (hf h)).antisymm h
lemma gfp_induction {p : α → Prop} (hf : monotone f)
(step : ∀ a, p a → gfp f ≤ a → p (f a)) (hInf : ∀ s, (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → p (Inf s)) :
p (gfp f) :=
begin
let s := {a | gfp f ≤ a ∧ p a},
have hpInf := hInf s (λ a ha, ha.2),
have h : gfp f ≤ Inf s := gfp_le (λ a ha, le_Inf (λ b hb, (le_gfp ha).trans hb.1)),
rw h.antisymm (le_gfp (Inf_le ⟨(gfp_fixed_point hf).ge.trans (hf h), step _ hpInf h⟩)),
exact hpInf,
end
lemma monotone_gfp : monotone (@gfp α _) :=
λ f g h, gfp_le $ λ a ha, le_gfp $ ha.trans (h a)
end fixedpoint
section fixedpoint_eqn
variables [complete_lattice α] [complete_lattice β] {f : β → α} {g : α → β}
-- Rolling rule
lemma lfp_comp (hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : lfp (f ∘ g) = f (lfp (g ∘ f)) :=
le_antisymm (lfp_le $ hf (lfp_fixed_point (hg.comp hf)).le)
(le_lfp $ λ a ha, (hf $ lfp_le $ show (g ∘ f) (g a) ≤ g a, from hg ha).trans ha)
lemma gfp_comp (hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : gfp (f ∘ g) = f (gfp (g ∘ f)) :=
(gfp_le $ λ a ha, ha.trans $ hf $ le_gfp $ show g a ≤ (g ∘ f) (g a), from hg ha).antisymm
(le_gfp $ hf (gfp_fixed_point (hg.comp hf)).ge)
-- Diagonal rule
lemma lfp_lfp {h : α → α → α} (m : ∀ ⦃a b c d⦄, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → h a c ≤ h b d) :
lfp (lfp ∘ h) = lfp (λ x, h x x) :=
begin
let a := lfp (lfp ∘ h),
refine (lfp_le _).antisymm (lfp_le (eq.le _)),
{ exact lfp_le (lfp_fixed_point (λ a b hab, m hab hab)).le },
have ha : (lfp ∘ h) a = a := lfp_fixed_point
((monotone_lfp : monotone (_ : _ → α)).comp (λ b c hbc x, m hbc le_rfl)),
calc h a a = h a (lfp (h a)) : congr_arg (h a) ha.symm
... = (lfp ∘ h) a : lfp_fixed_point $ λ b c hbc, m le_rfl hbc
... = a : ha,
end
lemma gfp_gfp {h : α → α → α} (m : ∀ ⦃a b c d⦄, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → h a c ≤ h b d) :
gfp (gfp ∘ h) = gfp (λ x, h x x) :=
begin
let a := gfp (gfp ∘ h),
refine (le_gfp (eq.ge _)).antisymm (le_gfp (le_gfp (gfp_fixed_point (λ a b hab, m hab hab)).ge)),
have ha : (gfp ∘ h) a = a := gfp_fixed_point
((monotone_gfp : monotone (_ : _ → α)).comp (λ b c hbc x, m hbc le_rfl)),
calc h a a = h a (gfp (h a)) : congr_arg (h a) ha.symm
... = (gfp ∘ h) a : gfp_fixed_point $ λ b c hbc, m le_rfl hbc
... = a : ha,
end
end fixedpoint_eqn
/- The complete lattice of fixed points of a function f -/
namespace fixed_points
variables [complete_lattice α] (f : α → α) (hf : monotone f)
def prev (x : α) : α := gfp (λ z, x ⊓ f z)
def next (x : α) : α := lfp (λ z, x ⊔ f z)
variable {f}
lemma prev_le {x : α} : prev f x ≤ x := gfp_le $ λ z hz, hz.trans inf_le_left
lemma prev_eq (hf : monotone f) {a : α} (h : f a ≤ a) : f (prev f a) = prev f a :=
calc f (prev f a) = a ⊓ f (prev f a) : (inf_of_le_right $ (hf prev_le).trans h).symm
... = prev f a : gfp_fixed_point $ λ x y h, inf_le_inf_left _ (hf h)
def prev_fixed (hf : monotone f) (a : α) (h : f a ≤ a) : fixed_points f :=
⟨prev f a, prev_eq hf h⟩
lemma le_next {x : α} : x ≤ next f x := le_lfp $ λ z hz, le_sup_left.trans hz
lemma next_eq (hf : monotone f) {a : α} (h : a ≤ f a) : f (next f a) = next f a :=
calc f (next f a) = a ⊔ f (next f a) : (sup_of_le_right $ h.trans (hf le_next)).symm
... = next f a : lfp_fixed_point $ λ x y h, sup_le_sup_left (hf h) _
def next_fixed (hf : monotone f) (a : α) (h : a ≤ f a) : fixed_points f :=
⟨next f a, next_eq hf h⟩
variable f
lemma sup_le_f_of_fixed_points (x y : fixed_points f) : x.1 ⊔ y.1 ≤ f (x.1 ⊔ y.1) :=
sup_le (x.2.ge.trans (hf le_sup_left)) (y.2.ge.trans (hf le_sup_right))
lemma f_le_inf_of_fixed_points (x y : fixed_points f) : f (x.1 ⊓ y.1) ≤ x.1 ⊓ y.1 :=
le_inf ((hf inf_le_left).trans x.2.le) ((hf inf_le_right).trans y.2.le)
lemma Sup_le_f_of_fixed_points (A : set α) (hA : A ⊆ fixed_points f) : Sup A ≤ f (Sup A) :=
Sup_le $ λ x hx, (hA hx) ▸ (hf $ le_Sup hx)
lemma f_le_Inf_of_fixed_points (A : set α) (hA : A ⊆ fixed_points f) : f (Inf A) ≤ Inf A :=
le_Inf $ λ x hx, (hA hx) ▸ (hf $ Inf_le hx)
/-- **Knaster-Tarski Theorem**: The fixed points of `f` form a complete lattice.
This cannot be an instance, since it depends on the monotonicity of `f`. -/
protected def complete_lattice : complete_lattice (fixed_points f) :=
{ le := (≤),
le_refl := le_refl,
le_trans := λ x y z, le_trans,
le_antisymm := λ x y, le_antisymm,
sup := λ x y, next_fixed hf (x.1 ⊔ y.1) (sup_le_f_of_fixed_points f hf x y),
le_sup_left := λ x y, (le_sup_left.trans le_next : x.1 ≤ _),
le_sup_right := λ x y, (le_sup_right.trans le_next : y.1 ≤ _),
sup_le := λ x y z hxz hyz, lfp_le $ sup_le (sup_le hxz hyz) (z.2.symm ▸ le_refl z.1),
inf := λ x y, prev_fixed hf (x.1 ⊓ y.1) (f_le_inf_of_fixed_points f hf x y),
inf_le_left := λ x y, (prev_le.trans inf_le_left : _ ≤ x.1),
inf_le_right := λ x y, (prev_le.trans inf_le_right : _ ≤ y.1),
le_inf := λ x y z hxy hxz, le_gfp $ le_inf (le_inf hxy hxz) (x.2.symm ▸ le_refl x),
top := prev_fixed hf ⊤ le_top,
le_top := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, le_gfp $ le_inf le_top (hx.symm ▸ le_rfl),
bot := next_fixed hf ⊥ bot_le,
bot_le := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, lfp_le $ sup_le bot_le (hx.symm ▸ le_rfl),
Sup := λ A, next_fixed hf (Sup $ subtype.val '' A)
(Sup_le_f_of_fixed_points f hf (subtype.val '' A) (λ z ⟨x, hx⟩, hx.2 ▸ x.2)),
le_Sup := λ A x hx, (le_Sup $ show x.1 ∈ subtype.val '' A, from ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩).trans le_next,
Sup_le := λ A x hx, lfp_le $ sup_le (Sup_le $ λ z ⟨y, hyA, hyz⟩, hyz ▸ hx y hyA)
(x.2.symm ▸ le_rfl),
Inf := λ A, prev_fixed hf (Inf $ subtype.val '' A)
(f_le_Inf_of_fixed_points f hf (subtype.val '' A) (λ z ⟨x, hx⟩, hx.2 ▸ x.2)),
le_Inf := λ A x hx, le_gfp $ le_inf (le_Inf $ λ z ⟨y, hyA, hyz⟩, hyz ▸ hx y hyA)
(x.2.symm ▸ le_rfl),
Inf_le := λ A x hx, prev_le.trans (Inf_le $ show x.1 ∈ subtype.val '' A, from ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩)}
end fixed_points
|
8c2e2f52a0861103af4ded704426bf27d8bc83eb | 9a0b1b3a653ea926b03d1495fef64da1d14b3174 | /tidy/lib/table.lean | ed9f04a1603c1d0cb0175ba3d130215ea08d1c17 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | khoek/mathlib-tidy | 8623b27b4e04e7d598164e7eaf248610d58f768b | 866afa6ab597c47f1b72e8fe2b82b97fff5b980f | refs/heads/master | 1,585,598,975,772 | 1,538,659,544,000 | 1,538,659,544,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,905 | lean | import data.list
import .array
universes u v w z
def table_ref : Type := ℕ
def table_ref.from_nat (r : ℕ) : table_ref := r
def table_ref.to_nat (r : table_ref) : ℕ := r
def table_ref.to_string (r : table_ref) : string := to_string r.to_nat
def table_ref.next (r : table_ref) : table_ref := table_ref.from_nat (r + 1)
def table_ref.null : table_ref := table_ref.from_nat 0x8FFFFFFF
def table_ref.first : table_ref := table_ref.from_nat 0
instance : has_to_string table_ref := ⟨λ t, t.to_string⟩
class indexed (α : Type u) :=
(index : α → table_ref)
class keyed (α : Type u) (κ : Type v) [decidable_eq κ] :=
(key : α → κ)
structure table (α : Type u) :=
(next_id : table_ref)
(buff_len : ℕ)
(entries : array buff_len (option α))
namespace table
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {κ : Type w} [decidable_eq κ] (t : table α)
-- TODO use push_back and pop_back builtins to avoid array preallocation
-- TODO several recusion-induced-meta can be removed from the file (given proofs)
def DEFAULT_BUFF_LEN := 10
def create (buff_len : ℕ := DEFAULT_BUFF_LEN) : table α :=
⟨ table_ref.first, buff_len, mk_array buff_len none ⟩
meta def from_list (l : list α) : table α :=
let n := l.length in
let buff : array n (option α) := mk_array n none in
⟨ table_ref.from_nat n, n, buff.list_map_copy (λ a, some a) l⟩
meta def from_map_array {dim : ℕ} (x : array dim α) (f : α → β) : table β :=
let buff : array dim (option β) := mk_array dim none in
⟨table_ref.from_nat dim, dim, x.map_copy buff (λ a, some $ f a)⟩
meta def from_array {dim : ℕ} (x : array dim α) : table α :=
from_map_array x $ λ a, a
def is_full : bool := t.next_id.to_nat = t.buff_len
private def try_fin (r : table_ref) : option (fin t.buff_len) :=
begin
let r := r.to_nat,
by_cases h : r < t.buff_len,
exact fin.mk r h,
exact none
end
meta def grow : table α :=
let new_len := t.buff_len * 2 in
let new_buff : array new_len (option α) := mk_array new_len none in
{t with buff_len := new_len, entries := array.copy t.entries new_buff}
def at_ref (r : table_ref) : option α :=
match try_fin t r with
| none := none
| some r := t.entries.read r
end
meta def get (r : table_ref) : tactic α := t.at_ref r
def iget [inhabited α] (r : table_ref) : α :=
match t.at_ref r with
| none := default α
| some a := a
end
def set (r : table_ref) (a : α) : table α :=
match try_fin t r with
| none := t
| some r := {t with entries := t.entries.write r a}
end
meta def alloc (a : α) : table α :=
let t : table α := if t.is_full then t.grow else t in
let t := t.set t.next_id a in
{ t with next_id := t.next_id.next }
meta def alloc_list : table α → list α → table α
| t [] := t
| t (a :: rest) := alloc_list (t.alloc a) rest
def update [indexed α] (a : α) : table α := t.set (indexed.index a) a
def length : ℕ := t.next_id.to_nat
meta def find_from (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : table_ref → option α
| ref := match t.at_ref ref with
| none := none
| some a := if p a then some a else find_from ref.next
end
meta def find (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : option α := t.find_from p table_ref.first
meta def find_key [decidable_eq κ] [keyed α κ] (key : κ) : option α := t.find (λ a, key = @keyed.key _ _ _ _ a)
meta def foldl (f : β → α → β) (b : β) (t : table α) : β :=
t.entries.foldl b (λ a : option α, λ b : β, match a with
| none := b
| some a := f b a
end)
meta def map (f : α → β) : table β :=
let new_buff : array t.buff_len (option β) := mk_array t.buff_len none in
⟨t.next_id, t.buff_len, t.entries.map_copy new_buff (λ a : option α, match a with
| none := none
| some a := f a
end)⟩
meta def mmap {m : Type v → Type z} [monad m] (f : α → m β) : m (table β) := do
let new_buff : array t.buff_len (option β) := mk_array t.buff_len none,
new_buff ← t.entries.mmap_copy new_buff (λ a : option α, match a with
| none := pure none
| some a := do v ← f a, pure $ some v
end),
return ⟨t.next_id, t.buff_len, new_buff⟩
def is_after_last (r : table_ref) : bool := t.next_id.to_nat <= r.to_nat
meta def to_list : list α := t.foldl (λ l : list α, λ a : α, l.concat a) []
meta instance [has_to_string α] : has_to_string (table α) := ⟨λ t, to_string t.to_list⟩
end table |
2a512bd86fa0f89dca430cae755c668d160e4c7d | 9ad8d18fbe5f120c22b5e035bc240f711d2cbd7e | /src/undergraduate/MAS114/Semester 1/exercises_1.lean | 96e3c482ab3c966cd943bfc3572211248f0b707c | [] | no_license | agusakov/lean_lib | c0e9cc29fc7d2518004e224376adeb5e69b5cc1a | f88d162da2f990b87c4d34f5f46bbca2bbc5948e | refs/heads/master | 1,642,141,461,087 | 1,557,395,798,000 | 1,557,395,798,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 45,763 | lean | import data.real.basic data.fintype algebra.big_operators data.nat.modeq
import tactic.find tactic.squeeze
import MAS114.fiber
namespace MAS114
namespace exercises_1
namespace Q2
/- part (i)
We are asked about the following definition:
f : ℕ → ℝ is given by f n = sqrt n.
There are two wrinkles when formalising this in Lean.
Firstly, like most things with reals, we need to mark the
definition as noncomputable. In Lean, "computation" means
"exact computation", and we do not have algorithms for
exact computation with real numbers.
Secondly, the Lean library defines a function
real.sqrt : ℝ → ℝ, which is the ordinary square root for
nonnegative arguments, but is zero for negative arguments,
so it does not satisfy (real.sqrt x) ^ 2 = x in general.
Because of this, we feel obliged to provide a proof that
our function f has the expected property (f n) ^ 2 = n.
Note here that the right hand side of this equation involves
an implicit cast from ℕ to ℝ. We will have to do quite a
lot of messing around with casts like this.
-/
noncomputable def f : ℕ → ℝ := λ n, real.sqrt n
lemma f_spec : ∀ n : ℕ, (f n) ^ 2 = n :=
begin
intro n,
have h0 : (0 : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ) := nat.cast_le.mpr (nat.zero_le n),
have h1 : max (0 : ℝ) (n : ℝ) = n := max_eq_right h0,
exact (pow_two (f n)).trans ((real.sqrt_prop n).right.trans h1),
end
/- f is injective -/
lemma f_inj : function.injective f :=
begin
intros n₀ n₁ e,
let n_R₀ := (n₀ : ℝ),
let n_R₁ := (n₁ : ℝ),
have e₁ : n_R₀ = n_R₁ := calc
n_R₀ = (f n₀) ^ 2 : (f_spec n₀).symm
... = (f n₁) ^ 2 : by rw[e]
... = n_R₁ : (f_spec n₁),
exact nat.cast_inj.mp e₁,
end
/- f is not surjective -/
lemma f_not_surj : ¬ (function.surjective f) :=
begin
intro f_surj,
rcases (f_surj (1/2)) with ⟨n,e0⟩,
let n_R := (n : ℝ),
have e1 : 4 * n_R = (((4 * n) : ℕ) : ℝ) := by
{ dsimp[n_R],rw[nat.cast_mul,nat.cast_bit0,nat.cast_bit0,nat.cast_one] },
let e2 := calc
4 * n_R = 4 * ((f n) ^ 2) : by rw[f_spec n]
... = 4 * ((1 / 2) ^ 2) : by rw[e0]
... = 1 : by ring
... = ((1 : ℕ) : ℝ) : by rw[nat.cast_one],
let e3 : 4 * n = 1 := nat.cast_inj.mp (e1.symm.trans e2),
let e4 := calc
0 = (4 * n) % 4 : (nat.mul_mod_right 4 n).symm
... = 1 % 4 : by rw[e3]
... = 1 : rfl,
injection e4,
end
/- part (ii) -/
/-
We are asked to pass judgement on the following "definition" :
g : ℤ → ℝ is given by g n = sqrt n.
We do this by proving that there is no map g : ℤ → ℝ such that
(g n) ^ 2 = n for all n.
-/
lemma square_nonneg {α : Type*} [linear_ordered_ring α] (x : α) : 0 ≤ x * x :=
begin
rcases (le_or_gt 0 x) with x_nonneg | x_neg,
{exact mul_nonneg x_nonneg x_nonneg,},
{have x_nonpos : x ≤ 0 := le_of_lt x_neg,
exact mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos x_nonpos x_nonpos
}
end
/-
I am surprised that this does not seem to be in the library.
Perhaps I did not look in the right way.
-/
lemma neg_one_not_square {α : Type*} [linear_ordered_ring α] (x : α) :
x * x ≠ -1 :=
begin
intro e0,
have e1 : (0 : α) ≤ -1 := e0.subst (square_nonneg x),
have e2 : (-1 : α) < 0 := neg_neg_of_pos zero_lt_one,
exact not_le_of_gt e2 e1,
end
lemma g_does_not_exist : ¬ ∃ (g : ℤ → ℝ), (∀ n : ℤ, (g n) ^ 2 = n) :=
begin
rintro ⟨g,g_spec⟩,
let x := g ( -1 ),
have e0 : -1 = (( -1 : ℤ ) : ℝ) := by simp,
have e1 : x * x = -1 :=
by { rw[← pow_two], dsimp[x], rw[e0], exact g_spec ( -1 )},
exact neg_one_not_square x e1,
end
/- part (iii) -/
/-
We are asked about the following definition:
h : ℤ → ℕ is given by h(n) = |n|.
There is no problem with formalising the definition. Note,
however, that the Lean library defines both
int.abs : ℤ → ℤ and int.nat_abs : ℤ → ℕ; we need the
latter here.
-/
def h : ℤ → ℕ := int.nat_abs
/- h is not injective -/
lemma h_not_inj : ¬ (function.injective h) :=
begin
intro h_inj,
let e : (1 : ℤ) = (-1 : ℤ) := @h_inj (1 : ℤ) (-1 : ℤ) rfl,
injection e,
end
/- h is surjective -/
lemma h_surj : function.surjective h :=
begin
intro n,use n,refl,
end
/- part (iv) -/
/-
We are asked to pass judgement on the following "definition" :
i : ℕ → ℕ is given by i n = 100 - n.
We do this by proving that there is no map i : ℕ → ℕ such that
(i n) + n = 100 for all n.
Note, however, that Lean would happily accept the definition
def i (n : ℕ) : ℕ := 100 - n, but it would interpret the
minus sign as truncated subtraction, so that i n = 0 for n ≥ 100.
-/
lemma i_does_not_exist : ¬ ∃ (i : ℕ → ℕ), (∀ n : ℕ, (i n) + n = 100) :=
begin
rintro ⟨i,i_spec⟩,
have e0 : 101 ≤ 100 := (i_spec 101).subst (nat.le_add_left 101 (i 101)),
let e1 : 100 < 101 := nat.lt_succ_self 100,
exact not_le_of_gt e1 e0,
end
/- part (v) -/
/-
We are asked about the following definition:
j : ℤ → ℤ is given by j(n) = - n.
There is no problem with formalising the definition. We
then prove that j j = 1, so j is self-inverse. We use
theorems from the library to deduce from this that j is
injective, surjective and bijective, rather than working
directly from the definitions.
-/
def j : ℤ → ℤ := λ n, - n
lemma jj (n : ℤ) : j (j n) = n := by simp[j]
lemma j_inj : function.injective j :=
function.injective_of_left_inverse jj
lemma j_surj : function.surjective j :=
function.surjective_of_has_right_inverse ⟨j,jj⟩
lemma j_bij : function.bijective j := ⟨j_inj,j_surj⟩
/- part (vi) -/
/-
We are asked to pass judgement on the following "definition" :
k : ℝ → ℤ sends x ∈ ℝ to the closest integer.
We define precisely what it means for n to be the closest
integer to x : we should have | x - m | > | x - n | for any
integer m ≠ n. We then show that if m ∈ ℤ, there is no
closest integer to m + 1/2. From this we deduce that there
is no function k with the expected properties.
This is much harder work than you might think. A lot of the
problem is caused by the cast maps ℤ → ℚ → ℝ
-/
def is_closest_integer (n : ℤ) (x : ℝ) :=
∀ m : ℤ, m ≠ n → abs ( x - m ) > abs ( x - n )
/-
Even basic identities like 1/2 - 1 = -1/2 cannot easily be
proved directly in ℝ, because there are no general algorithms
for exact calculation in ℝ. We need to work in ℚ and then
apply the cast map.
-/
def half_Q : ℚ := 1 / 2
def neg_half_Q : ℚ := - half_Q
noncomputable def half_R : ℝ := half_Q
noncomputable def neg_half_R : ℝ := neg_half_Q
/-
Here is a small identity that could in principle be proved
by a long string of applications of the commutative ring axioms.
The "ring" tactic automates the process of finding this string.
For reasons that I do not fully understand, the ring tactic
seems to work more reliably if we do it in a separate lemma
so that the terms are just free variables. We can then
substitute values for this variables as an extra step. In
particular, we will substitute h = 1/2, and then give a
separate argument that the final term 2 * h - 1 is zero.
-/
lemma misc_identity (m n h : ℝ) :
(m + h) - (2 * m + 1 - n) = - ((m + h) - n) + (2 * h - 1) :=
by ring
/-
We now prove that there is no closest integer to m + 1/2.
The obvious approach would be to focus attention on the
candidates n = m and n = m + 1, but it turns out that that
creates more work than necessary. It is more efficient to
prove that for all n, the integer k = 2 m + 1 - n is different
from n and lies at the same distance from m + 1/2, so
n does not have the required property.
-/
lemma no_closest_integer (n m : ℤ) :
¬ (is_closest_integer n ((m : ℝ) + half_R)) :=
begin
intro h0,
let x_Q : ℚ := (m : ℚ) + half_Q,
let x_R : ℝ := (m : ℝ) + half_R,
let k := 2 * m + 1 - n,
by_cases e0 : k = n,
{-- In this block we consider the possibility that k = n, and
-- show that it is impossible.
exfalso,
dsimp[k] at e0,
let e1 := calc
(1 : ℤ) = (2 * m + 1 + -n) + n - 2 * m : by ring
... = n + n - 2 * m : by rw[e0]
... = 2 * (n - m) : by ring,
have e2 := calc
(1 : ℤ) = int.mod 1 2 : rfl
... = int.mod (2 * (n - m)) 2 : congr_arg (λ x, int.mod x 2) e1
... = 0 : int.mul_mod_right 2 (n - m),
exact (dec_trivial : (1 : ℤ) ≠ 0) e2,
},{
let h1 := ne_of_gt (h0 k e0),
let u_R := x_R - n,
let v_R := x_R - k,
have h2 : v_R = - u_R + (2 * half_R - 1) := begin
dsimp[u_R,v_R,x_R,k],
rw[int.cast_add,int.cast_add,int.cast_mul,int.cast_bit0],
rw[int.cast_one,int.cast_neg],
exact misc_identity (↑ m) (↑ n) half_R,
end,
have h3 : 2 * half_Q - 1 = 0 := dec_trivial,
have h4 : 2 * half_R - 1 = (((2 * half_Q - 1) : ℚ) : ℝ) :=
begin
dsimp[half_R],
rw[rat.cast_add,rat.cast_mul,rat.cast_bit0,rat.cast_neg,rat.cast_one],
end,
have h5 : 2 * half_R - 1 = 0 := by rw[h4,h3,rat.cast_zero],
rw[h5,add_zero] at h2,
have h6 : abs v_R = abs u_R := by rw[h2,abs_neg],
exact h1 h6,
}
end
lemma k_does_not_exist : ¬ ∃ (k : ℝ → ℤ), (∀ x : ℝ, is_closest_integer (k x) x) :=
begin
rintro ⟨k,k_spec⟩,
let x : ℝ := (0 : ℤ) + half_R,
exact no_closest_integer (k x) 0 (k_spec x)
end
end Q2
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q3
/-
Here we ask various questions about functions between the
sets A = {1,2,..,10} and B = {1,2,...,100}.
Everything would be a bit easier if we modified the question
and used the sets {0,...,9} and {0,...,99} instead, because
Lean starts things at zero by default. However, we have
decided to bite the bullet and deal with the extra complexity.
-/
def A0 : finset ℕ := (finset.range 11).erase 0
def B0 : finset ℕ := (finset.range 101).erase 0
def A := {n // n ∈ A0}
def B := {n // n ∈ B0}
instance A_fintype : fintype A := by {dsimp[A],apply_instance}
instance B_fintype : fintype B := by {dsimp[B],apply_instance}
lemma A_card : fintype.card A = 10 :=
fintype.subtype_card A0 (by {intro H,refl})
lemma B_card : fintype.card B = 100 :=
fintype.subtype_card B0 (by {intro H,refl})
lemma A_in_B {i : ℕ} (i_in_A : i ∈ A0) : i ∈ B0 :=
begin
rcases (finset.mem_erase.mp i_in_A) with ⟨i_ne_0,i_in_range_11⟩,
have i_lt_11 := finset.mem_range.mp i_in_range_11,
have : 11 < 101 := dec_trivial,
have i_lt_101 : i < 101 := lt_trans i_lt_11 this,
have i_in_range_101 := finset.mem_range.mpr i_lt_101,
exact finset.mem_erase.mpr ⟨i_ne_0,i_in_range_101⟩
end
/-
We want to define f : A → B to be the inclusion.
In Lean, the proof that A is contained in B has to be
wrapped in to the definition of f.
-/
def f : A → B := λ ⟨i,i_in_A⟩, ⟨i,A_in_B i_in_A⟩
/- f is injective -/
lemma f_inj : function.injective f :=
begin
rintros ⟨i,i_in_A⟩ ⟨j,j_in_A⟩ e,
dsimp[f] at e,
have e1 : i = j := congr_arg subtype.val e,
exact subtype.eq e1
end
/-
We now want to define g : B → A by g n = n for n ≤ 10,
and g n = 10 for n > 10. We first define this as a
map g0 : B → ℕ, then give the proof that g0 B ⊆ A,
then use this to construct g as a map B → A.
-/
def g0 : B → ℕ := λ ⟨j,j_in_B⟩, if j < 11 then j else 10
lemma g0_in_A : ∀ b : B, (g0 b ∈ A0)
| ⟨j,j_in_B⟩ := begin
rcases (finset.mem_erase.mp j_in_B) with ⟨j_ne_0,j_in_range_101⟩,
have j_lt_101 := finset.mem_range.mp j_in_range_101,
by_cases h : j < 11,
{have : g0 ⟨j,j_in_B⟩ = j := by {dsimp[g0],rw[if_pos h]},
rw[this],
let j_in_range_11 := finset.mem_range.mpr h,
exact finset.mem_erase.mpr ⟨j_ne_0,j_in_range_11⟩,
},{
have : g0 ⟨j,j_in_B⟩ = 10 := by {dsimp[g0],rw[if_neg h]},
rw[this],
exact finset.mem_erase.mpr ⟨dec_trivial,finset.mem_range.mpr dec_trivial⟩,
}
end
def g (b : B) : A := ⟨g0 b,g0_in_A b⟩
/- We have g f a = a for all a ∈ A, so g is a left inverse for f -/
lemma gf : function.left_inverse g f
| ⟨i,i_in_A⟩ := begin
rcases (finset.mem_erase.mp i_in_A) with ⟨i_ne_0,i_in_range_11⟩,
have i_lt_11 := finset.mem_range.mp i_in_range_11,
apply subtype.eq,
dsimp[f,g,g0],
rw[if_pos i_lt_11],
end
/- g is surjective (because it has a right inverse) -/
lemma g_surj : function.surjective g :=
function.surjective_of_has_right_inverse ⟨f,gf⟩
/- There is no injective map j : B → A, because |B| > |A|.
We use the library theorem fintype.card_le_of_injective
for this.
-/
lemma no_injection : ¬ ∃ j : B → A, function.injective j :=
begin
rintro ⟨j,j_inj⟩,
let h := fintype.card_le_of_injective j j_inj,
rw[A_card,B_card] at h,
exact not_lt_of_ge h dec_trivial,
end
/- There is no surjective map p : A → B, because |B| > |A|.
We use the theorem card_le_of_projective for this.
Surprisingly, this does not seem to be in the standard
library. It is proved in the separate file fiber.lean
distributed alongside this one.
-/
lemma no_surjection : ¬ ∃ p : A → B, function.surjective p :=
begin
rintro ⟨p,p_surj⟩,
let h := card_le_of_surjective p_surj,
rw[A_card,B_card] at h,
exact not_lt_of_ge h dec_trivial,
end
end Q3
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q4
/-
This question is about "gappy sets", ie subsets s in
fin n = {0,...,n-1} such that s contains no adjacent pairs
{i,i+1}.
-/
/- We find it convenient to introduce a new notation for
the zero element in fin m. Notice that this only exists
when m > 0, or equivalently, when m has the form
n.succ = n + 1 for some n.
-/
def fin.z {n : ℕ} : fin (n.succ) := 0
lemma fin.z_val {n : ℕ} : (@fin.z n).val = 0 := rfl
lemma fin.succ_ne_z {n : ℕ} (a : fin n) : a.succ ≠ fin.z :=
begin
intro e,
replace e := fin.veq_of_eq e,
rw[fin.succ_val,fin.z_val] at e,
injection e,
end
lemma fin.succ_inj {n : ℕ} {a b : fin n} (e : a.succ = b.succ) :
a = b :=
begin
apply fin.eq_of_veq,
replace e := congr_arg fin.val e,
rw[fin.succ_val,fin.succ_val] at e,
exact nat.succ_inj e,
end
def is_gappy : ∀ {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n)), Prop
| 0 _ := true
| (nat.succ n) s := ∀ a : fin n, ¬ (a.cast_succ ∈ s ∧ a.succ ∈ s)
instance is_gappy_decidable :
forall {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n)), decidable (is_gappy s)
| 0 _ := by {dsimp[is_gappy],apply_instance}
| (nat.succ n) s := by {dsimp[is_gappy],apply_instance}
def gappy' (n : ℕ) : finset (finset (fin n)) :=
finset.univ.filter is_gappy
def gappy (n : ℕ) : Type :=
{ s : finset (fin n) // is_gappy s }
instance {n : ℕ} : fintype (gappy n) :=
by { dsimp[gappy], apply_instance }
instance {n : ℕ} : decidable_eq (gappy n) :=
by { dsimp[gappy], apply_instance }
instance {n : ℕ} : has_repr (gappy n) :=
⟨λ (s : gappy n), repr s.val⟩
def shift {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n)) : finset (fin n.succ) :=
s.image fin.succ
def unshift {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n.succ)) : finset (fin n) :=
finset.univ.filter (λ a, a.succ ∈ s)
lemma mem_shift {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n)) (a : fin n.succ) :
a ∈ shift s ↔ ∃ b : fin n, b ∈ s ∧ b.succ = a :=
begin
rw[shift],split,
{intro a_in_shift,
rcases finset.mem_image.mp a_in_shift with ⟨b,⟨b_in_s,e⟩⟩,
use b,
exact ⟨b_in_s,e⟩,
},{
rintro ⟨b,⟨b_in_s,e⟩⟩,
exact finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨b,⟨b_in_s,e⟩⟩,
}
end
lemma zero_not_in_shift {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n)) :
fin.z ∉ shift s :=
begin
intro h0,
rcases ((mem_shift s) 0).mp h0 with ⟨b,⟨b_in_s,e⟩⟩,
let h1 := congr_arg fin.val e,
rw[fin.succ_val] at h1,
injection h1,
end
lemma succ_mem_shift_iff {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n)) (a : fin n) :
a.succ ∈ shift s ↔ a ∈ s :=
begin
rw[mem_shift s a.succ],
split,{
rintro ⟨b,⟨b_in_s,u⟩⟩,
rw[(fin.succ_inj u).symm],
exact b_in_s,
},{
intro a_in_s,use a,exact ⟨a_in_s,rfl⟩,
}
end
lemma mem_unshift {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n.succ)) (a : fin n) :
a ∈ unshift s ↔ a.succ ∈ s :=
begin
rw[unshift,finset.mem_filter],
split,
{intro h,exact h.right},
{intro h,exact ⟨finset.mem_univ a,h⟩ }
end
lemma unshift_shift {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n)) :
unshift (shift s) = s :=
begin
ext,rw[mem_unshift (shift s) a],rw[succ_mem_shift_iff],
end
lemma unshift_insert {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n.succ)) :
unshift (insert fin.z s) = unshift s :=
begin
ext,rw[mem_unshift,mem_unshift,finset.mem_insert],
split,
{intro h,rcases h with h0 | h1,
{exfalso,exact fin.succ_ne_z a h0},
{exact h1}
},
{exact λ h,or.inr h}
end
lemma shift_unshift0 {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n.succ)) (h : fin.z ∉ s) :
shift (unshift s) = s :=
begin
ext,
rcases a with ⟨_ | b_val,a_is_lt⟩,
{have e : @fin.z n = ⟨0,a_is_lt⟩ := fin.eq_of_veq rfl,
rw[← e],simp only[zero_not_in_shift,h],
},{
let b : fin n := ⟨b_val,nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ a_is_lt⟩,
have e : b.succ = ⟨b_val.succ,a_is_lt⟩ :=
by { apply fin.eq_of_veq,rw[fin.succ_val], },
rw[← e,succ_mem_shift_iff (unshift s) b,mem_unshift s b],
}
end
lemma shift_unshift1 {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n.succ)) (h : fin.z ∈ s) :
insert fin.z (shift (unshift s)) = s :=
begin
ext,
rw[finset.mem_insert],
rcases a with ⟨_ | b_val,a_is_lt⟩,
{have e : @fin.z n = ⟨0,a_is_lt⟩ := fin.eq_of_veq rfl,
rw[← e],simp only[h,eq_self_iff_true,true_or],
},{
let b : fin n := ⟨b_val,nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ a_is_lt⟩,
have e : b.succ = ⟨b_val.succ,a_is_lt⟩ :=
by { apply fin.eq_of_veq,rw[fin.succ_val], },
rw[← e,succ_mem_shift_iff (unshift s) b,mem_unshift s b],
split,
{rintro (u0 | u1),
{exfalso,exact fin.succ_ne_z b u0,},
{exact u1}
},
{intro h,right,exact h,}
}
end
lemma shift_gappy : ∀ {n : ℕ} {s : finset (fin n)},
is_gappy s → is_gappy (shift s)
| 0 _ _ := λ a, fin.elim0 a
| (nat.succ n) s s_gappy := begin
rintros a ⟨a_in_shift,a_succ_in_shift⟩,
let a_in_s : a ∈ s := (succ_mem_shift_iff s a).mp a_succ_in_shift,
rcases (mem_shift s a.cast_succ).mp a_in_shift with ⟨b,⟨b_in_s,eb⟩⟩,
replace eb := congr_arg fin.val eb,
rw[fin.succ_val,fin.cast_succ_val] at eb,
let c_is_lt : b.val < n :=
nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (eb.symm ▸ a.is_lt),
let c : fin n := ⟨b.val,c_is_lt⟩,
have ebc : b = fin.cast_succ c := fin.eq_of_veq (by rw[fin.cast_succ_val]),
have eac : a = fin.succ c := fin.eq_of_veq (nat.succ_inj (by rw[← eb,fin.succ_val])),
rw[ebc] at b_in_s,
rw[eac] at a_in_s,
exact s_gappy c ⟨b_in_s,a_in_s⟩,
end
lemma unshift_gappy : ∀ {n : ℕ} {s : finset (fin n.succ)},
is_gappy s → is_gappy (unshift s)
| 0 _ _ := trivial
| (nat.succ n) s s_gappy := begin
rintros a ⟨a_in_unshift,a_succ_in_unshift⟩,
let a_succ_in_s := (mem_unshift s a.cast_succ).mp a_in_unshift,
let a_succ_succ_in_s := (mem_unshift s a.succ).mp a_succ_in_unshift,
have e : a.cast_succ.succ = a.succ.cast_succ :=
fin.eq_of_veq
(by {rw[fin.succ_val,fin.cast_succ_val,fin.cast_succ_val,fin.succ_val]}),
rw[e] at a_succ_in_s,
exact s_gappy a.succ ⟨a_succ_in_s,a_succ_succ_in_s⟩,
end
lemma insert_gappy : ∀ {n : ℕ} {s : finset (fin n.succ.succ)},
is_gappy s → (∀ (a : fin n.succ.succ), a ∈ s → a.val ≥ 2) →
is_gappy (insert fin.z s) :=
begin
rintros n s s_gappy s_big a ⟨a_in_t,a_succ_in_t⟩,
rcases finset.mem_insert.mp a_succ_in_t with a_succ_zero | a_succ_in_s,
{exact fin.succ_ne_z a a_succ_zero},
let a_pos : 0 < a.val :=
nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ ((fin.succ_val a) ▸ (s_big a.succ a_succ_in_s)),
rcases finset.mem_insert.mp a_in_t with a_zero | a_in_s,
{replace a_zero : a.val = 0 :=
(fin.cast_succ_val a).symm.trans (congr_arg fin.val a_zero),
rw[a_zero] at a_pos,
exact lt_irrefl 0 a_pos,
},{
exact s_gappy a ⟨a_in_s,a_succ_in_s⟩,
}
end
def i {n : ℕ} (s : gappy n) : gappy n.succ :=
⟨shift s.val,shift_gappy s.property⟩
lemma i_val {n : ℕ} (s : gappy n) : (i s).val = shift s.val := rfl
lemma zero_not_in_i {n : ℕ} (s : gappy n) : fin.z ∉ (i s).val :=
zero_not_in_shift s.val
lemma shift_big {n : ℕ} (s : finset (fin n)) :
∀ (a : fin n.succ.succ), a ∈ shift (shift s) → a.val ≥ 2 :=
begin
intros a ma,
rcases (mem_shift (shift s) a).mp ma with ⟨b,⟨mb,eb⟩⟩,
rcases (mem_shift s b).mp mb with ⟨c,⟨mc,ec⟩⟩,
rw[← eb,← ec,fin.succ_val,fin.succ_val],
apply nat.succ_le_succ,
apply nat.succ_le_succ,
exact nat.zero_le c.val,
end
def j {n : ℕ} (s : gappy n) : gappy n.succ.succ :=
⟨insert fin.z (shift (shift s.val)),
begin
let h := insert_gappy (shift_gappy (shift_gappy s.property)) (shift_big s.val),
exact h,
end⟩
lemma j_val {n : ℕ} (s : gappy n) :
(j s).val = insert fin.z (shift (shift s.val)) := rfl
lemma zero_in_j {n : ℕ} (s : gappy n) : fin.z ∈ (j s).val :=
finset.mem_insert_self _ _
def p {n : ℕ} : (gappy n) ⊕ (gappy n.succ) → gappy n.succ.succ
| (sum.inl s) := j s
| (sum.inr s) := i s
def q {n : ℕ} (s : gappy n.succ.succ) : (gappy n) ⊕ (gappy n.succ) :=
if fin.z ∈ s.val then
sum.inl ⟨unshift (unshift s.val),unshift_gappy (unshift_gappy s.property)⟩
else
sum.inr ⟨unshift s.val,unshift_gappy s.property⟩
lemma qp {n : ℕ} (s : (gappy n) ⊕ (gappy n.succ)) : q (p s) = s :=
begin
rcases s with s | s; dsimp[p,q],
{rw[if_pos (zero_in_j s)],congr,apply subtype.eq,
change unshift (unshift (j s).val) = s.val,
rw[j_val,unshift_insert,unshift_shift,unshift_shift],
},
{rw[if_neg (zero_not_in_i s)],congr,apply subtype.eq,
change unshift (i s).val = s.val,
rw[i_val,unshift_shift],
}
end
lemma pq {n : ℕ} (s : gappy n.succ.succ) : p (q s) = s :=
begin
dsimp[q],split_ifs; dsimp[p]; apply subtype.eq,
{rw[j_val],
change insert fin.z (shift (shift (unshift (unshift s.val )))) = s.val,
have z_not_in_us : fin.z ∉ unshift s.val := begin
intro z_in_us,
let z_succ_in_s := (mem_unshift s.val fin.z).mp z_in_us,
exact s.property fin.z ⟨h,z_succ_in_s⟩,
end,
rw[shift_unshift0 (unshift s.val) z_not_in_us],
rw[shift_unshift1 s.val h],
},{
rw[i_val],
change shift (unshift s.val) = s.val,
exact shift_unshift0 s.val h,
}
end
def gappy_equiv {n : ℕ} :
((gappy n) ⊕ (gappy n.succ)) ≃ (gappy n.succ.succ) := {
to_fun := p,
inv_fun := q,
left_inv := qp,
right_inv := pq
}
lemma gappy_card_step (n : ℕ) :
fintype.card (gappy n.succ.succ) =
fintype.card (gappy n) + fintype.card (gappy n.succ) :=
begin
let e0 := fintype.card_congr (@gappy_equiv n),
let e1 := fintype.card_sum (gappy n) (gappy n.succ),
exact e0.symm.trans e1,
end
def fibonacci : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| 1 := 1
| (nat.succ (nat.succ n)) := (fibonacci n) + (fibonacci n.succ)
lemma gappy_card : ∀ (n : ℕ), fintype.card (gappy n) = fibonacci n.succ.succ
| 0 := rfl
| 1 := rfl
| (nat.succ (nat.succ n)) := begin
rw[gappy_card_step n,gappy_card n,gappy_card n.succ],
dsimp[fibonacci],refl,
end
end Q4
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q5
def A : finset ℕ := [0,1,2].to_finset
def B : finset ℕ := [0,1,2,3].to_finset
def C : finset ℤ := [-2,-1,0,1,2].to_finset
def D : finset ℤ := [-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3].to_finset
lemma int.lt_succ_iff {n m : ℤ} : n < m + 1 ↔ n ≤ m :=
⟨int.le_of_lt_add_one,int.lt_add_one_of_le⟩
lemma nat.square_le {n m : ℕ} : m ^ 2 ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n.sqrt :=
⟨λ h0, le_of_not_gt (λ h1, not_le_of_gt ((nat.pow_two m).symm.subst (nat.sqrt_lt.mp h1)) h0),
λ h0, le_of_not_gt (λ h1,not_le_of_gt (nat.sqrt_lt.mpr ((nat.pow_two m).subst h1)) h0)⟩
lemma nat.square_lt {n m : ℕ} : m ^ 2 < n.succ ↔ m ≤ n.sqrt :=
(@nat.lt_succ_iff (m ^ 2) n).trans (@nat.square_le n m)
lemma int.abs_le {n m : ℤ} : abs m ≤ n ↔ (- n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n) :=
begin
by_cases hm : 0 ≤ m,
{ rw[abs_of_nonneg hm],
exact ⟨
λ hmn, ⟨le_trans (neg_nonpos_of_nonneg (le_trans hm hmn)) hm,hmn⟩,
λ hmn, hmn.right
⟩
},{
let hma := le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge hm),
let hmb := neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hma,
rw[abs_of_nonpos hma],
exact ⟨
λ hmn, ⟨(neg_neg m) ▸ (neg_le_neg hmn),le_trans (le_trans hma hmb) hmn⟩,
λ hmn, (neg_neg n) ▸ (neg_le_neg hmn.left),
⟩
}
end
lemma int.abs_le' {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} : m.nat_abs ≤ n ↔ (- (n : ℤ) ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n) :=
begin
let h := @int.abs_le n m,
rw[int.abs_eq_nat_abs,int.coe_nat_le] at h,
exact h,
end
lemma int.abs_square (n : ℤ) : n ^ 2 = (abs n) ^ 2 := begin
by_cases h0 : n ≥ 0,
{rw[abs_of_nonneg h0]},
{rw[abs_of_neg (lt_of_not_ge h0),pow_two,pow_two,neg_mul_neg],}
end
lemma int.abs_square' (n : ℤ) : n ^ 2 = ((int.nat_abs n) ^ 2 : ℕ) :=
calc
n ^ 2 = n * n : pow_two n
... = ↑ (n.nat_abs * n.nat_abs) : int.nat_abs_mul_self.symm
... = ↑ (n.nat_abs ^ 2 : ℕ) : by rw[(nat.pow_two n.nat_abs).symm]
lemma int.square_le {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} :
m ^ 2 ≤ n ↔ - (n.sqrt : ℤ) ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n.sqrt :=
begin
rw[int.abs_square',int.coe_nat_le,nat.square_le,int.abs_le'],
end
lemma int.square_lt {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} :
m ^ 2 < n.succ ↔ - (n.sqrt : ℤ) ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n.sqrt :=
begin
rw[int.abs_square',int.coe_nat_lt,nat.square_lt,int.abs_le'],
end
lemma A_spec (n : ℕ) : n ∈ A ↔ n ^ 2 < 9 := begin
have sqrt_8 : 2 = nat.sqrt 8 := nat.eq_sqrt.mpr ⟨dec_trivial,dec_trivial⟩,
exact calc
n ∈ A ↔ n ∈ finset.range 3 : by rw[(dec_trivial : A = finset.range 3)]
... ↔ n < 3 : finset.mem_range
... ↔ n ≤ 2 : by rw[nat.lt_succ_iff]
... ↔ n ≤ nat.sqrt 8 : by rw[← sqrt_8]
... ↔ n ^ 2 < 9 : by rw[nat.square_lt]
end
lemma B_spec (n : ℕ) : n ∈ B ↔ n ^ 2 ≤ 9 := begin
have sqrt_9 : 3 = nat.sqrt 9 := nat.eq_sqrt.mpr ⟨dec_trivial,dec_trivial⟩,
exact calc
n ∈ B ↔ n ∈ finset.range 4 : by rw[(dec_trivial : B = finset.range 4)]
... ↔ n < 4 : finset.mem_range
... ↔ n ≤ 3 : by rw[nat.lt_succ_iff]
... ↔ n ≤ nat.sqrt 9 : by rw[← sqrt_9]
... ↔ n ^ 2 ≤ 9 : by rw[nat.square_le]
end
lemma C_spec (n : ℤ) : n ∈ C ↔ n ^ 2 < 9 := begin
have sqrt_8 : 2 = nat.sqrt 8 := nat.eq_sqrt.mpr ⟨dec_trivial,dec_trivial⟩,
have e0 : (3 : ℤ) = ((2 : ℕ) : ℤ) + (1 : ℤ) := rfl,
have e1 : (-2 : ℤ) = - ((2 : ℕ) : ℤ) := rfl,
have e2 : ((nat.succ 8) : ℤ) = 9 := rfl,
let e3 := @int.square_lt 8 n,
exact calc
n ∈ C ↔ n ∈ (int.range (-2) 3).to_finset :
by rw[(dec_trivial : C = (int.range (-2) 3).to_finset)]
... ↔ n ∈ int.range (-2) 3 : by rw[list.mem_to_finset]
... ↔ -2 ≤ n ∧ n < 3 : int.mem_range_iff
... ↔ - ((2 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ n ∧ n < (2 : ℕ) + 1 : by rw[e0,e1]
... ↔ - ((2 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ n ∧ n ≤ (2 : ℕ) : by rw[int.lt_succ_iff]
... ↔ - (nat.sqrt 8 : ℤ) ≤ n ∧ n ≤ nat.sqrt 8 : by rw[← sqrt_8]
... ↔ n ^ 2 < nat.succ 8 : by rw[e3]
... ↔ n ^ 2 < 9 : by rw[e2],
end
lemma D_spec (n : ℤ) : n ∈ D ↔ n ^ 2 ≤ 9 := begin
have sqrt_9 : 3 = nat.sqrt 9 := nat.eq_sqrt.mpr ⟨dec_trivial,dec_trivial⟩,
have e0 : (4 : ℤ) = ((3 : ℕ) : ℤ) + (1 : ℤ) := rfl,
have e1 : (-3 : ℤ) = - ((3 : ℕ) : ℤ) := rfl,
have e2 : ((9 : ℕ) : ℤ) = 9 := rfl,
let e3 := @int.square_le 9 n,
exact calc
n ∈ D ↔ n ∈ (int.range (-3) 4).to_finset :
by rw[(dec_trivial : D = (int.range (-3) 4).to_finset)]
... ↔ n ∈ int.range (-3) 4 : by rw[list.mem_to_finset]
... ↔ -3 ≤ n ∧ n < 4 : int.mem_range_iff
... ↔ - ((3 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ n ∧ n < (3 : ℕ) + 1 : by rw[e0,e1]
... ↔ - ((3 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ n ∧ n ≤ (3 : ℕ) : by rw[int.lt_succ_iff]
... ↔ - (nat.sqrt 9 : ℤ) ≤ n ∧ n ≤ nat.sqrt 9 : by rw[← sqrt_9]
... ↔ n ^ 2 ≤ (9 : ℕ) : by rw[e3]
... ↔ n ^ 2 ≤ 9 : by rw[e2]
end
end Q5
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q6
def A : finset ℕ := [1,2,4].to_finset
def B : finset ℕ := [2,3,5].to_finset
def C : finset ℕ := [1,2,3,4,5].to_finset
def D : finset ℕ := [2].to_finset
def E : finset ℕ := [3,4].to_finset
lemma L1 : A ∪ B = C := dec_trivial
lemma L2 : A ∩ B = D := dec_trivial
lemma L3 : D ∩ E = ∅ := dec_trivial
end Q6
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q7
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable
lemma L1 (U : Type) (A B : set U) : - (A ∪ B) = (- A) ∩ (- B) :=
by { simp }
lemma L2 (U : Type) (A B : set U) : - (A ∩ B) = (- A) ∪ (- B) :=
begin
ext x,
rw[set.mem_union,set.mem_compl_iff,set.mem_compl_iff,set.mem_compl_iff],
by_cases hA : (x ∈ A); by_cases hB : (x ∈ B); simp[hA,hB],
end
end Q7
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q8
end Q8
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q9
def even (n : ℤ) := ∃ k : ℤ, n = 2 * k
def odd (n : ℤ) := ∃ k : ℤ, n = 2 * k + 1
lemma L1 (n : ℤ) : even n → even (n ^ 2) :=
begin
rintro ⟨k,e⟩,
use n * k,
rw[e,pow_two],ring,
end
lemma L2 (n m : ℤ) : even n → even m → even (n + m) :=
begin
rintros ⟨k,ek⟩ ⟨l,el⟩,
use k + l,
rw[ek,el],
ring,
end
lemma L3 (n m : ℤ) : odd n → odd m → odd (n * m) :=
begin
rintros ⟨k,ek⟩ ⟨l,el⟩,
use k + l + 2 * k * l,
rw[ek,el],
ring,
end
/- Do the converses -/
end Q9
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q10
def f : ℝ → ℝ := λ x, x ^ 2 - 7 * x + 10
def f_alt : ℝ → ℝ := λ x, (x - 2) * (x - 5)
lemma f_eq (x : ℝ) : f x = f_alt x := by {dsimp[f,f_alt],ring}
lemma f_two : f 2 = 0 := by {dsimp[f],ring}
lemma f_five : f 5 = 0 := by {dsimp[f],ring}
lemma two_ne_five : (2 : ℝ) ≠ (5 : ℝ) :=
begin
intro e,
have h2 : (2 : ℝ) = ((2 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by {simp},
have h5 : (5 : ℝ) = ((5 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by {simp},
rw[h5,h2] at e,
exact (dec_trivial : 2 ≠ 5) (nat.cast_inj.mp e),
end
def P1 (x : ℝ) : Prop := f x = 0 → x = 2 ∧ x = 5
def P2 (x : ℝ) : Prop := f x = 0 → x = 2 ∨ x = 5
lemma L1 : ¬ (∀ x : ℝ, P1 x) :=
begin
intro h_P1,
exact two_ne_five (h_P1 2 f_two).right,
end
lemma L2 : ∀ x : ℝ, P2 x :=
begin
intros x fx,
rw[f_eq x] at fx,
dsimp[f_alt] at fx,
rcases eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero fx with x_eq_2 | x_eq_5,
{rw[← sub_eq_add_neg] at x_eq_2,
exact or.inl (sub_eq_zero.mp x_eq_2),
},{
rw[← sub_eq_add_neg] at x_eq_5,
exact or.inr (sub_eq_zero.mp x_eq_5),
}
end
end Q10
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q11
end Q11
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q12
def f : ℚ → ℚ := λ x, x * (x + 1) * (2 * x + 1) / 6
lemma f_step (x : ℚ) : f (x + 1) = (x + 1) ^ 2 + f x :=
begin
dsimp[f],
apply sub_eq_zero.mp,
rw[pow_two],
ring,
end
lemma sum_of_squares : ∀ (n : ℕ),
(((finset.range n.succ).sum (λ i, i ^ 2)) : ℚ) = f n
| 0 := rfl
| (n + 1) := begin
rw[finset.sum_range_succ,sum_of_squares n],
have : (((n + 1) : ℕ) : ℚ) = ((n + 1) : ℚ ) := by simp,
rw[this,f_step n]
end
end Q12
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q13
end Q13
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q14
def f : ℚ → ℚ := λ x, (x + 1) / (2 * x)
lemma f_step (x : ℚ) : x > 1 → (1 - 1 / (x ^ 2)) * f (x - 1) = f x :=
begin
intro x_big,
let d := 2 * (x - 1) * (x ^ 2) ,
/- Prove that all relevant denominators are nonzero -/
let nz_x : x ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt (by linarith using [x_big])).symm,
let nz_2x : 2 * x ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero dec_trivial nz_x,
let nz_x2 : x ^ 2 ≠ 0 := by {rw[pow_two], exact mul_ne_zero nz_x nz_x},
let nz_y : x - 1 ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt (by linarith using [x_big])).symm,
let nz_2y : 2 * (x - 1) ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero dec_trivial nz_y,
let nz_d : d ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero nz_2y nz_x2,
let e0 := calc
(x ^ 2) * (1 - 1 / (x ^ 2)) = (x ^ 2) * 1 - (x ^ 2) * (1 / (x ^ 2)) :
by rw[mul_sub]
... = x ^ 2 - 1 : by rw[mul_one,mul_div_cancel' 1 nz_x2],
let e1 := calc
d * (1 - 1 / (x ^ 2)) = (2 * (x - 1)) * ((x ^ 2) * (1 - 1 / (x ^ 2))) :
by rw[mul_assoc]
... = (2 * (x - 1)) * (x ^ 2 - 1) : by rw[e0]
... = (x ^ 2 - 1) * (2 * (x - 1)) : by rw[mul_comm],
let e2 : (x - 1) + 1 = x := by ring,
let e3 := calc
(2 * (x - 1)) * f (x - 1) = (2 * (x - 1)) * (((x - 1) + 1) / (2 * (x - 1))) : rfl
... = (2 * (x - 1)) * (x / (2 * (x - 1))) : by rw[e2]
... = x * (2 * (x - 1) / (2 * (x - 1))) : mul_div_comm (2 * (x - 1)) x (2 * (x - 1))
... = x : by rw[div_self nz_2y,mul_one],
let e4 := calc
d * ((1 - 1 / (x ^ 2)) * f (x - 1)) = (d * (1 - 1 / (x ^ 2))) * f (x - 1) :
by rw[← mul_assoc]
... = (x ^ 2 - 1) * (2 * (x - 1)) * f (x - 1) : by rw[e1]
... = (x ^ 2 - 1) * x : by rw[mul_assoc,e3]
... = (x ^ 2) * x - 1 * x : by rw[sub_mul]
... = x ^ 3 - x : by rw[← pow_succ',one_mul],
let e5 : d = (x * x - x) * (2 * x) := by {dsimp[d],ring},
let e6 := calc
d * f x = d * ((x + 1) / (2 * x)) : rfl
... = ((x * x - x) * (2 * x)) * ((x + 1) / (2 * x)) : by rw[e5]
... = (x * x - x) * ((2 * x) * ((x + 1) / (2 * x))) : by rw[mul_assoc]
... = (x * x - x) * (x + 1) : by rw[mul_div_comm,div_self nz_2x,mul_one]
... = x ^ 3 - x : by ring,
exact eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left nz_d (e4.trans e6.symm),
end
lemma product_formula : ∀ (n : ℕ),
(finset.range n).prod (λ k, ((1 - 1 / ((k + 2) ^ 2)) : ℚ)) = f (n + 1)
| 0 := rfl
| (n + 1) := begin
have e0 : 1 < n + 2 := by linarith,
have e1 : (1 : ℚ) < ((n + 2) : ℕ) := nat.cast_lt.mpr e0,
rw[nat.cast_add,nat.cast_bit0,nat.cast_one] at e1,
rw[finset.prod_range_succ,product_formula n],
let e2 := f_step (n + 2) e1,
have e3 : (n : ℚ) + 2 - 1 = n + 1 := by ring,
have e4 : (((n + 1) : ℕ) : ℚ) + 1 = (n : ℚ) + 2 :=
by { rw[nat.cast_add,nat.cast_one],ring},
rw[e3] at e2,
rw[e2,e4],
end
end Q14
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q15
end Q15
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q16
lemma nat.bodd_even (n : ℕ) : (2 * n).bodd = ff :=
by {rw[nat.bodd_mul,nat.bodd_two,band],}
lemma nat.bodd_odd (n : ℕ) : (2 * n + 1).bodd = tt :=
by {rw[nat.bodd_add,nat.bodd_even],refl}
lemma nat.div2_even : ∀ (n : ℕ), (2 * n).div2 = n
| 0 := rfl
| (n + 1) := begin
have : 2 * (n + 1) = (2 * n + 1).succ := by ring,
rw[this,nat.div2_succ,nat.bodd_odd,bool.cond_tt],
rw[nat.div2_succ,nat.bodd_even,bool.cond_ff],
rw[nat.div2_even n],
end
lemma nat.div2_odd (n : ℕ) : (2 * n + 1).div2 = n :=
by {rw[nat.div2_succ,nat.bodd_even,bool.cond_ff,nat.div2_even]}
lemma wf_lemma : ∀ (m : ℕ), m.succ.div2 < m.succ
| 0 := dec_trivial
| (nat.succ m) := begin
rw[nat.div2_succ],
cases m.succ.bodd; simp only[bool.cond_tt,bool.cond_ff],
exact lt_trans (wf_lemma m) m.succ.lt_succ_self,
exact nat.succ_lt_succ (wf_lemma m)
end
lemma wf_lemma' (m : ℕ) :
cond (nat.bodd m) (nat.succ (nat.div2 m)) (nat.div2 m) < nat.succ m :=
begin
cases m,
{exact dec_trivial,},
let u := wf_lemma m,
cases m.succ.bodd; simp only[bool.cond_tt,bool.cond_ff],
exact lt_trans u m.succ.lt_succ_self,
exact nat.succ_lt_succ u,
end
def f : bool → ℕ → ℕ
| ff u := 4 * u + 1
| tt u := 9 * u + 2
def a : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (nat.succ m) :=
have cond (nat.bodd m) (nat.succ (nat.div2 m)) (nat.div2 m) < nat.succ m := wf_lemma' m,
f m.succ.bodd (a m.succ.div2)
lemma a_even (n : ℕ) : n > 0 → a (2 * n) = 4 * (a n) + 1 :=
begin
intro n_pos,
let k := n.pred,
have e0 : n = k + 1 := (nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n_pos).symm,
let m := 2 * k + 1,
have e1 : 2 * n = m.succ := calc
2 * n = 2 * (k + 1) : by rw[e0]
... = 2 * k + 2 : by rw[mul_add,mul_one]
... = m.succ : rfl,
rw[e1,a,← e1,nat.bodd_even,nat.div2_even,f],
end
lemma a_odd (n : ℕ) : a (2 * n + 1) = 9 * (a n) + 2 :=
begin
change a (2 * n).succ = 9 * (a n) + 2,
rw[a,nat.bodd_odd,nat.div2_odd,f],
end
lemma a_even_step (n : ℕ) : n > 0 → n ^ 2 ≤ a n → (2 * n) ^ 2 ≤ a (2 * n) :=
begin
intros n_pos ih,
rw[a_even n n_pos],
exact calc
(2 * n) ^ 2 = 4 * n ^ 2 : by ring
... ≤ 4 * a n : nat.mul_le_mul_left 4 ih
... ≤ 4 * a n + 1 : nat.le_succ _
end
lemma a_odd_step (n : ℕ) : n ^ 2 ≤ a n → (2 * n + 1) ^ 2 ≤ a (2 * n + 1) :=
begin
intro ih,
rw[a_odd n],
exact calc
(2 * n + 1) ^ 2 = 4 * n + (4 * n ^ 2 + 1) : by ring
... ≤ 4 * n ^ 2 + (4 * n ^ 2 + 1) :
by {apply (nat.add_le_add_iff_le_right _ _ _).mpr,
rw[nat.pow_two],
exact nat.mul_le_mul_left 4 (nat.le_mul_self n),}
... = 8 * n ^ 2 + 1 : by ring
... ≤ 9 * n ^ 2 + 2 : by linarith
... ≤ 9 * a n + 2 :
by {apply (nat.add_le_add_iff_le_right _ _ _).mpr,
exact nat.mul_le_mul_left 9 ih,}
end
lemma square_le : ∀ n, n ^ 2 ≤ a n
| 0 := le_refl 0
| (nat.succ m) :=
have cond (nat.bodd m) (nat.succ (nat.div2 m)) (nat.div2 m) < nat.succ m := wf_lemma' m,
begin
let e := nat.bodd_add_div2 m.succ,
rw[nat.bodd_succ] at e,
rw[← e],
rcases m.bodd;
simp only[bnot,bool.cond_ff,bool.cond_tt,zero_add],
{intros u0 u1,
rw[nat.add_comm 1],
exact a_odd_step m.succ.div2 (square_le m.succ.div2),
},{
intros u0 u1,
by_cases h : m.succ.div2 = 0,
{exfalso,rw[h,mul_zero] at u0,exact nat.succ_ne_zero m u0.symm},
exact a_even_step m.succ.div2 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h) (square_le m.succ.div2),
}
end
end Q16
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
/- --------------------------------------------------------- -/
namespace Q17
/- This is the basic definition of fibonacci numbers. It
is not good for efficient evaluation.
-/
def fibonacci : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| 1 := 1
| (n + 2) := (fibonacci n) + (fibonacci (n + 1))
/- We now do a more efficient version, and prove that it is
consistent with the original one.
-/
def fibonacci_step : ℕ × ℕ → ℕ × ℕ :=
λ ⟨a,b⟩, ⟨b, a + b⟩
def fibonacci_pair : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ
| 0 := ⟨0,1⟩
| (n + 1) := fibonacci_step (fibonacci_pair n)
lemma fibonacci_pair_spec : ∀ n ,
fibonacci_pair n = ⟨fibonacci n,fibonacci n.succ⟩
| 0 := rfl
| (nat.succ n) := begin
rw[fibonacci_pair,fibonacci_pair_spec n,fibonacci_step,fibonacci],
ext,refl,refl,
end
lemma fibonacci_from_pair (n : ℕ) :
fibonacci n = (fibonacci_pair n).fst :=
by rw[fibonacci_pair_spec n].
/- We now prove a fact about the fibonacci numbers mod 2.
Later we will generalise this for an arbitrary modulus.
-/
lemma fibonacci_bodd_step (n : ℕ) :
(fibonacci (n + 3)).bodd = (fibonacci n).bodd :=
begin
rw[fibonacci,fibonacci,nat.bodd_add,nat.bodd_add],
cases (fibonacci (n + 1)).bodd;
cases (fibonacci n).bodd;
refl,
end
lemma fibonacci_bodd : ∀ n, (fibonacci n).bodd = bnot (n % 3 = 0)
| 0 := rfl
| 1 := rfl
| 2 := rfl
| (n + 3) := begin
rw[fibonacci_bodd_step n,fibonacci_bodd n],congr,
end
lemma F2013_even : (fibonacci 2013).bodd = ff := calc
(fibonacci 2013).bodd = bnot (2013 % 3 = 0) : fibonacci_bodd _
... = ff : by norm_num
/-
We now do a more general theory of modular periodicity
of fibonacci numbers. For computational efficiency, we
give an inductive definition of modular fibonacci numbers
that does not require us to calculate the non-modular ones.
We then prove that it is consistent with the original
definition.
-/
def pair_mod (p : ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ → ℕ × ℕ :=
λ ⟨a,b⟩, ⟨a % p,b % p⟩
lemma pair_mod_mod (p : ℕ) : ∀ (c : ℕ × ℕ),
pair_mod p (pair_mod p c) = pair_mod p c :=
λ ⟨a,b⟩, by {simp[pair_mod,nat.mod_mod],}
def fibonacci_pair_mod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ
| 0 := pair_mod p ⟨0,1⟩
| (n + 1) := pair_mod p (fibonacci_step (fibonacci_pair_mod n))
lemma fibonacci_pair_mod_mod (p : ℕ) : ∀ n,
pair_mod p (fibonacci_pair_mod p n) = fibonacci_pair_mod p n
| 0 := by {rw[fibonacci_pair_mod,pair_mod_mod],}
| (n + 1) := by {rw[fibonacci_pair_mod,pair_mod_mod],}
lemma mod_step_mod (p : ℕ) : ∀ (c : ℕ × ℕ),
pair_mod p (fibonacci_step c) =
pair_mod p (fibonacci_step (pair_mod p c)) :=
λ ⟨a,b⟩, begin
change (⟨b % p,(a + b) % p⟩ : ℕ × ℕ) =
⟨b % p % p,(a % p + b % p) % p⟩,
have e0 : b % p % p = b % p := nat.mod_mod b p,
have e1 : (a % p + b % p) % p = (a + b) % p :=
nat.modeq.modeq_add (nat.mod_mod a p) (nat.mod_mod b p),
rw[e0,e1],
end
lemma fibonacci_pair_mod_spec (p : ℕ) : ∀ n,
fibonacci_pair_mod p n = pair_mod p (fibonacci_pair n)
| 0 := rfl
| (n + 1) := begin
rw[fibonacci_pair_mod,fibonacci_pair,fibonacci_pair_mod_spec n],
rw[← mod_step_mod],
end
lemma fibonacci_mod_spec (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
(fibonacci_pair_mod p n).fst = (fibonacci n) % p :=
begin
rw[fibonacci_pair_mod_spec,fibonacci_pair_spec,pair_mod],
refl,
end
lemma fibonacci_pair_period₀ {p : ℕ} {d : ℕ}
(h : fibonacci_pair_mod p d = pair_mod p ⟨0,1⟩) :
∀ n, fibonacci_pair_mod p (n + d) = fibonacci_pair_mod p n
| 0 := by {rw[zero_add,h,fibonacci_pair_mod],}
| (n + 1) := by {
rw[add_assoc,add_comm 1 d,← add_assoc],
rw[fibonacci_pair_mod,fibonacci_pair_mod],
rw[fibonacci_pair_period₀ n],
}
lemma fibonacci_pair_period₁ {p : ℕ} {d : ℕ}
(h : fibonacci_pair_mod p d = pair_mod p ⟨0,1⟩) (m : ℕ) :
∀ n, fibonacci_pair_mod p (m + d * n) = fibonacci_pair_mod p m
| 0 := by {rw[mul_zero,add_zero]}
| (n + 1) := by {
have : m + d * (n + 1) = (m + d * n) + d := by ring,
rw[this,fibonacci_pair_period₀ h,fibonacci_pair_period₁],
}
lemma fibonacci_pair_period {p : ℕ} {d : ℕ}
(h : fibonacci_pair_mod p d = pair_mod p ⟨0,1⟩) (n : ℕ) :
fibonacci_pair_mod p n = fibonacci_pair_mod p (n % d) :=
calc
fibonacci_pair_mod p n = fibonacci_pair_mod p (n % d + d * (n / d)) :
congr_arg (fibonacci_pair_mod p) (nat.mod_add_div n d).symm
... = fibonacci_pair_mod p (n % d) : fibonacci_pair_period₁ h (n % d) (n / d)
lemma fibonacci_period {p : ℕ} {d : ℕ}
(h : fibonacci_pair_mod p d = pair_mod p ⟨0,1⟩) (n : ℕ) :
(fibonacci n) ≡ (fibonacci (n % d)) [MOD p] :=
begin
rw[nat.modeq,← fibonacci_mod_spec,← fibonacci_mod_spec],
rw[fibonacci_pair_period],
exact h,
end
lemma prime_89 : nat.prime 89 := by { norm_num, }
lemma L89_dvd_F2013 : 89 ∣ (fibonacci 2013) :=
begin
apply (nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).mpr,
have h0 : fibonacci_pair_mod 89 44 = ⟨0,1⟩ :=
by {unfold fibonacci_pair_mod fibonacci_step pair_mod; norm_num},
have h1 : fibonacci_pair_mod 89 33 = ⟨0,34⟩ :=
by {unfold fibonacci_pair_mod fibonacci_step pair_mod; norm_num},
have h2 : 2013 % 44 = 33 := by {norm_num},
let h3 := (fibonacci_mod_spec 89 2013).symm,
let h4 := congr_arg prod.fst (fibonacci_pair_period h0 2013),
let h5 := congr_arg prod.fst (congr_arg (fibonacci_pair_mod 89) h2),
let h6 := congr_arg prod.fst h1,
exact ((h3.trans h4).trans h5).trans h6,
end
end Q17
namespace Q18
end Q18
end exercises_1
end MAS114 |
6bdbcbacfd29d33d3f770429d924963a18cb8f36 | bab2ace2b909818f20ac125499a8dd88ce812721 | /src/2020/relations/partition_challenge_solution.lean | f8d2999cc25afbd17ea65ed85a0268cfefadde11 | [] | no_license | LaplaceKorea/M40001_lean | 8a3cd411fb821a7665132c09e436f02f674cc666 | 116e9ed1fadf59dc2e78376fca92026859a03bf2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,347,195,820 | 1,635,517,507,000 | 1,635,517,507,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,393 | lean | import data.equiv.basic
structure partition (X : Type) :=
(C : set (set X))
(Hnonempty : ∀ c ∈ C, c ≠ ∅)
(Hcover : ∀ x, ∃ c ∈ C, x ∈ c)
(Hunique : ∀ c d ∈ C, c ∩ d ≠ ∅ → c = d)
def partition.ext {X : Type} (P Q : partition X) (H : P.C = Q.C) : P = Q :=
begin
cases P, cases Q,
simpa using H,
end
def equivalence_class {X : Type} (R : X → X → Prop) (x : X) := {y : X | R y x}
lemma mem_class {X : Type} {R : X → X → Prop} (HR : equivalence R) (x : X) : x ∈ equivalence_class R x :=
begin
cases HR with HRR HR,
exact HRR x,
end
-- here is the bijection between equivalence relations and partitions
example (X : Type) : {R : X → X → Prop // equivalence R} ≃ partition X :=
{ to_fun := λ R, {
C := { S : set X | ∃ x : X, S = equivalence_class R x},
Hnonempty := begin
intro c,
intro hc,
cases hc with x hx,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
use x,
rw hx,
exact mem_class R.2 x,
end,
Hcover := begin
intro x,
use equivalence_class R x,
existsi _,
{ exact mem_class R.2 x },
use x,
end,
Hunique := begin
intros c d hc hd hcd,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty at hcd,
cases hcd with x hx,
cases hc with a ha,
cases hd with b hb,
cases R with R HR,
cases hx with hxc hxd,
rw ha at *,
rw hb at *,
change R x a at hxc,
change R x b at hxd,
rcases HR with ⟨HRR, HRS, HRT⟩,
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ intros y hy,
change R y a at hy,
change R y b,
refine HRT _ hxd,
refine HRT hy _,
apply HRS,
assumption
},
{ intros y hy,
change R y a,
change R y b at hy,
refine HRT _ hxc,
refine HRT hy _,
apply HRS,
assumption,
}
end },
inv_fun := λ P, ⟨λ x y, ∃ c ∈ P.C, x ∈ c ∧ y ∈ c, begin
split,
{ intro x,
cases P.Hcover x with c hc,
cases hc with hc hxc,
use c,
use hc,
split; assumption,
},
split,
{ intros x y hxy,
cases hxy with c hc,
cases hc with hc1 hc2,
use c,
use hc1,
cases hc2 with hx hy,
split; assumption
},
{ rintros x y z ⟨c, hc, hxc, hyc⟩ ⟨d, hd, hyd, hzd⟩,
use c,
use hc,
split,
exact hxc,
have hcd : c = d,
{ apply P.Hunique c d,
use hc,
use hd,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
use y,
split,
use hyc,
use hyd,
},
rw hcd,
use hzd,
}
end⟩,
left_inv := begin
rintro ⟨R, HRR, HRS, HRT⟩,
ext x y,
suffices : (∃ (c : set X), (∃ (x : X), c = equivalence_class R x) ∧ x ∈ c ∧ y ∈ c) ↔ R x y,
simpa,
split,
{ rintro ⟨c, ⟨z, rfl⟩, ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩,
refine HRT hx _,
apply HRS,
exact hy,
},
{ intro H,
use equivalence_class R x,
use x,
split,
exact HRR x,
exact HRS H,
}
end,
right_inv := begin
intro P,
dsimp,
cases P with C _ _ _,
dsimp,
apply partition.ext,
dsimp, -- dsimps everywhere
ext c,
split,
{ intro h,
dsimp at h,
cases h with x hx,
rw hx, clear hx,
rcases P_Hcover x with ⟨d, hd, hxd⟩,
convert hd, -- not taught in NNG
clear c,
ext y,
split,
{ intro hy,
unfold equivalence_class at hy,
dsimp at hy,
rcases hy with ⟨e, he, hye, hxe⟩,
convert hye, -- not taught
refine P_Hunique d e hd he _,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
use x,
split;assumption
},
{ intro hyd,
unfold equivalence_class, dsimp,
use d,
use hd,
split;assumption
},
},
{ intro hc,
dsimp,
have h := P_Hnonempty c hc,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty at h,
cases h with x hxc,
use x,
unfold equivalence_class,
ext y,
split,
{ intro hyc,
dsimp,
use c,
use hc,
split;assumption,
},
{ intro h,
dsimp at h,
rcases h with ⟨d, hd, hyd, hxd⟩,
convert hyd,
apply P_Hunique c d hc hd,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
use x,
split;assumption
}
}
end }
|
f4a1bca79d3f152429d4b74395404de89037efe8 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/ring_theory/ideal/operations.lean | f8bc703f08f1b1dd9e3a40c6275a821ed2087425 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 76,520 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.algebra.operations
import algebra.algebra.tower
import data.equiv.ring
import data.nat.choose.sum
import ring_theory.ideal.basic
import ring_theory.non_zero_divisors
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
universes u v w x
open_locale big_operators pointwise
namespace submodule
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
open_locale pointwise
instance has_scalar' : has_scalar (ideal R) (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ I N, ⨆ r : I, (r : R) • N⟩
/-- `N.annihilator` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • N = 0`. -/
def annihilator (N : submodule R M) : ideal R :=
(linear_map.lsmul R N).ker
variables {I J : ideal R} {N P : submodule R M}
theorem mem_annihilator {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0:M) :=
⟨λ hr n hn, congr_arg subtype.val (linear_map.ext_iff.1 (linear_map.mem_ker.1 hr) ⟨n, hn⟩),
λ h, linear_map.mem_ker.2 $ linear_map.ext $ λ n, subtype.eq $ h n.1 n.2⟩
theorem mem_annihilator' {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ N ≤ comap (r • linear_map.id) ⊥ :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨λ H n hn, (mem_bot R).2 $ H n hn, λ H n hn, (mem_bot R).1 $ H hn⟩
theorem annihilator_bot : (⊥ : submodule R M).annihilator = ⊤ :=
(ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ mem_annihilator'.2 bot_le
theorem annihilator_eq_top_iff : N.annihilator = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊥ :=
⟨λ H, eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ (n:M) hn, (mem_bot R).2 $
one_smul R n ▸ mem_annihilator.1 ((ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).1 H) n hn,
λ H, H.symm ▸ annihilator_bot⟩
theorem annihilator_mono (h : N ≤ P) : P.annihilator ≤ N.annihilator :=
λ r hrp, mem_annihilator.2 $ λ n hn, mem_annihilator.1 hrp n $ h hn
theorem annihilator_supr (ι : Sort w) (f : ι → submodule R M) :
(annihilator ⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, annihilator (f i) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, annihilator_mono $ le_supr _ _)
(λ r H, mem_annihilator'.2 $ supr_le $ λ i,
have _ := (mem_infi _).1 H i, mem_annihilator'.1 this)
theorem smul_mem_smul {r} {n} (hr : r ∈ I) (hn : n ∈ N) : r • n ∈ I • N :=
(le_supr _ ⟨r, hr⟩ : _ ≤ I • N) ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
theorem smul_le {P : submodule R M} : I • N ≤ P ↔ ∀ (r ∈ I) (n ∈ N), r • n ∈ P :=
⟨λ H r hr n hn, H $ smul_mem_smul hr hn,
λ H, supr_le $ λ r, map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ n hn, H r.1 r.2 n hn⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem smul_induction_on {p : M → Prop} {x} (H : x ∈ I • N)
(Hb : ∀ (r ∈ I) (n ∈ N), p (r • n)) (H0 : p 0)
(H1 : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(H2 : ∀ (c:R) n, p n → p (c • n)) : p x :=
(@smul_le _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ⟨p, H0, H1, H2⟩).2 Hb H
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨λ hx, smul_induction_on hx
(λ r hri n hnm,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm in ⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
⟨0, I.zero_mem, by rw [zero_smul]⟩
(λ m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩,
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩)
(λ c r ⟨y, hyi, hy⟩, ⟨c * y, I.mul_mem_left _ hyi, by rw [mul_smul, hy]⟩),
λ ⟨y, hyi, hy⟩, hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span $ set.mem_singleton m)⟩
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n, N.smul_mem r
theorem smul_mono (hij : I ≤ J) (hnp : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ J • P :=
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, smul_mem_smul (hij hr) (hnp hn)
theorem smul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I • N ≤ J • N :=
smul_mono h (le_refl N)
theorem smul_mono_right (h : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ I • P :=
smul_mono (le_refl I) h
@[simp] theorem annihilator_smul (N : submodule R M) : annihilator N • N = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 (smul_le.2 (λ r, mem_annihilator.1))
@[simp] theorem annihilator_mul (I : ideal R) : annihilator I * I = ⊥ :=
annihilator_smul I
@[simp] theorem mul_annihilator (I : ideal R) : I * annihilator I = ⊥ :=
by rw [mul_comm, annihilator_mul]
variables (I J N P)
@[simp] theorem smul_bot : I • (⊥ : submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsb,
(submodule.mem_bot R).2 $ ((submodule.mem_bot R).1 hsb).symm ▸ smul_zero r
@[simp] theorem bot_smul : (⊥ : ideal R) • N = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hrb s hsi,
(submodule.mem_bot R).2 $ ((submodule.mem_bot R).1 hrb).symm ▸ zero_smul _ s
@[simp] theorem top_smul : (⊤ : ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right $ λ r hri, one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
theorem smul_sup : I • (N ⊔ P) = I • N ⊔ I • P :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hri m hmnp, let ⟨n, hn, p, hp, hnpm⟩ := mem_sup.1 hmnp in
mem_sup.2 ⟨_, smul_mem_smul hri hn, _, smul_mem_smul hri hp, hnpm ▸ (smul_add _ _ _).symm⟩)
(sup_le (smul_mono_right le_sup_left)
(smul_mono_right le_sup_right))
theorem sup_smul : (I ⊔ J) • N = I • N ⊔ J • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hrij n hn, let ⟨ri, hri, rj, hrj, hrijr⟩ := mem_sup.1 hrij in
mem_sup.2 ⟨_, smul_mem_smul hri hn, _, smul_mem_smul hrj hn, hrijr ▸ (add_smul _ _ _).symm⟩)
(sup_le (smul_mono_left le_sup_left)
(smul_mono_left le_sup_right))
protected theorem smul_assoc : (I • J) • N = I • (J • N) :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ rs hrsij t htn,
smul_induction_on hrsij
(λ r hr s hs,
(@smul_eq_mul R _ r s).symm ▸ smul_smul r s t ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (smul_mem_smul hs htn))
((zero_smul R t).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ x y, (add_smul x y t).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ r s h, (@smul_eq_mul R _ r s).symm ▸ smul_smul r s t ▸ submodule.smul_mem _ _ h))
(smul_le.2 $ λ r hr sn hsn, suffices J • N ≤ submodule.comap (r • linear_map.id) ((I • J) • N),
from this hsn,
smul_le.2 $ λ s hs n hn, show r • (s • n) ∈ (I • J) • N,
from mul_smul r s n ▸ smul_mem_smul (smul_mem_smul hr hs) hn)
variables (S : set R) (T : set M)
theorem span_smul_span : (ideal.span S) • (span R T) =
span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.2 $ λ r hrS n hnT, span_induction hrS
(λ r hrS, span_induction hnT
(λ n hnT, subset_span $ set.mem_bUnion hrS $
set.mem_bUnion hnT $ set.mem_singleton _)
((smul_zero r : r • 0 = (0:M)).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ x y, (smul_add r x y).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ c m, by rw [smul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul]; exact submodule.smul_mem _ _))
((zero_smul R n).symm ▸ submodule.zero_mem _)
(λ r s, (add_smul r s n).symm ▸ submodule.add_mem _)
(λ c r, by rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_smul]; exact submodule.smul_mem _ _)) $
span_le.2 $ set.bUnion_subset $ λ r hrS, set.bUnion_subset $ λ n hnT, set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $
smul_mem_smul (subset_span hrS) (subset_span hnT)
variables {M' : Type w} [add_comm_monoid M'] [module R M']
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f,
from (f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) $
smul_le.2 $ λ r hr n hn, let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn in
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
end comm_semiring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {N N₁ N₂ P P₁ P₂ : submodule R M}
/-- `N.colon P` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • P ⊆ N`. -/
def colon (N P : submodule R M) : ideal R :=
annihilator (P.map N.mkq)
theorem mem_colon {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ ∀ p ∈ P, r • p ∈ N :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨λ H p hp, (quotient.mk_eq_zero N).1 (H (quotient.mk p) (mem_map_of_mem hp)),
λ H m ⟨p, hp, hpm⟩, hpm ▸ (N.mkq).map_smul r p ▸ (quotient.mk_eq_zero N).2 $ H p hp⟩
theorem mem_colon' {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ P ≤ comap (r • linear_map.id) N :=
mem_colon
theorem colon_mono (hn : N₁ ≤ N₂) (hp : P₁ ≤ P₂) : N₁.colon P₂ ≤ N₂.colon P₁ :=
λ r hrnp, mem_colon.2 $ λ p₁ hp₁, hn $ mem_colon.1 hrnp p₁ $ hp hp₁
theorem infi_colon_supr (ι₁ : Sort w) (f : ι₁ → submodule R M)
(ι₂ : Sort x) (g : ι₂ → submodule R M) :
(⨅ i, f i).colon (⨆ j, g j) = ⨅ i j, (f i).colon (g j) :=
le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, le_infi $ λ j, colon_mono (infi_le _ _) (le_supr _ _))
(λ r H, mem_colon'.2 $ supr_le $ λ j, map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ le_infi $ λ i,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ mem_colon'.1 $ have _ := ((mem_infi _).1 H i),
have _ := ((mem_infi _).1 this j), this)
end comm_ring
end submodule
namespace ideal
section chinese_remainder
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {ι : Type v}
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_mem (s : finset ι) {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) (i : ι) (his : i ∈ s) :
∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ f i ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → r ∈ f j :=
begin
have : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → ∃ r : R, ∃ H : r - 1 ∈ f i, r ∈ f j,
{ intros j hjs hji, specialize hf i his j hjs hji.symm,
rw [eq_top_iff_one, submodule.mem_sup] at hf,
rcases hf with ⟨r, hri, s, hsj, hrs⟩, refine ⟨1 - r, _, _⟩,
{ rw [sub_right_comm, sub_self, zero_sub], exact (f i).neg_mem hri },
{ rw [← hrs, add_sub_cancel'], exact hsj } },
classical,
have : ∃ g : ι → R, (∀ j, g j - 1 ∈ f i) ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → g j ∈ f j,
{ choose g hg1 hg2,
refine ⟨λ j, if H : j ∈ s ∧ j ≠ i then g j H.1 H.2 else 1, λ j, _, λ j, _⟩,
{ split_ifs with h, { apply hg1 }, rw sub_self, exact (f i).zero_mem },
{ intros hjs hji, rw dif_pos, { apply hg2 }, exact ⟨hjs, hji⟩ } },
rcases this with ⟨g, hgi, hgj⟩, use (∏ x in s.erase i, g x), split,
{ rw [← quotient.eq, ring_hom.map_one, ring_hom.map_prod],
apply finset.prod_eq_one, intros, rw [← ring_hom.map_one, quotient.eq], apply hgi },
intros j hjs hji, rw [← quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ring_hom.map_prod],
refine finset.prod_eq_zero (finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hji hjs) _,
rw quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, exact hgj j hjs hji
end
theorem exists_sub_mem [fintype ι] {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) (g : ι → R) :
∃ r : R, ∀ i, r - g i ∈ f i :=
begin
have : ∃ φ : ι → R, (∀ i, φ i - 1 ∈ f i) ∧ (∀ i j, i ≠ j → φ i ∈ f j),
{ have := exists_sub_one_mem_and_mem (finset.univ : finset ι) (λ i _ j _ hij, hf i j hij),
choose φ hφ,
existsi λ i, φ i (finset.mem_univ i),
exact ⟨λ i, (hφ i _).1, λ i j hij, (hφ i _).2 j (finset.mem_univ j) hij.symm⟩ },
rcases this with ⟨φ, hφ1, hφ2⟩,
use ∑ i, g i * φ i,
intros i,
rw [← quotient.eq, ring_hom.map_sum],
refine eq.trans (finset.sum_eq_single i _ _) _,
{ intros j _ hji, rw quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, exact (f i).mul_mem_left _ (hφ2 j i hji) },
{ intros hi, exact (hi $ finset.mem_univ i).elim },
specialize hφ1 i, rw [← quotient.eq, ring_hom.map_one] at hφ1,
rw [ring_hom.map_mul, hφ1, mul_one]
end
/-- The homomorphism from `R/(⋂ i, f i)` to `∏ i, (R / f i)` featured in the Chinese
Remainder Theorem. It is bijective if the ideals `f i` are comaximal. -/
def quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient (f : ι → ideal R) :
(⨅ i, f i).quotient →+* Π i, (f i).quotient :=
quotient.lift (⨅ i, f i)
(pi.ring_hom (λ i : ι, (quotient.mk (f i) : _))) $
λ r hr, begin
rw submodule.mem_infi at hr,
ext i,
exact quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 (hr i)
end
theorem quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient_bijective [fintype ι] {f : ι → ideal R}
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) :
function.bijective (quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f) :=
⟨λ x y, quotient.induction_on₂' x y $ λ r s hrs, quotient.eq.2 $
(submodule.mem_infi _).2 $ λ i, quotient.eq.1 $
show quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f (quotient.mk' r) i = _, by rw hrs; refl,
λ g, let ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_sub_mem hf (λ i, quotient.out' (g i)) in
⟨quotient.mk _ r, funext $ λ i, quotient.out_eq' (g i) ▸ quotient.eq.2 (hr i)⟩⟩
/-- Chinese Remainder Theorem. Eisenbud Ex.2.6. Similar to Atiyah-Macdonald 1.10 and Stacks 00DT -/
noncomputable def quotient_inf_ring_equiv_pi_quotient [fintype ι] (f : ι → ideal R)
(hf : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → f i ⊔ f j = ⊤) :
(⨅ i, f i).quotient ≃+* Π i, (f i).quotient :=
{ .. equiv.of_bijective _ (quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient_bijective hf),
.. quotient_inf_to_pi_quotient f }
end chinese_remainder
section mul_and_radical
variables {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
variables {I J K L : ideal R}
instance : has_mul (ideal R) := ⟨(•)⟩
@[simp] lemma add_eq_sup : I + J = I ⊔ J := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_bot : (0 : ideal R) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_eq_top : (1 : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
by erw [submodule.one_eq_range, linear_map.range_id]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
lemma pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
begin
induction n with n ih, { simp only [pow_zero, ideal.one_eq_top], },
simpa only [pow_succ] using mul_mem_mul hx ih,
end
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ (r ∈ I) (s ∈ J), r * s ∈ K :=
submodule.smul_le
lemma mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
ideal.mul_le.2 (λ r hr s, J.mul_mem_left _)
lemma mul_le_right : I * J ≤ I :=
ideal.mul_le.2 (λ r hr s hs, I.mul_mem_right _ hr)
@[simp] lemma sup_mul_right_self : I ⊔ (I * J) = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 ideal.mul_le_right
@[simp] lemma sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ (J * I) = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 ideal.mul_le_left
@[simp] lemma mul_right_self_sup : (I * J) ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 ideal.mul_le_right
@[simp] lemma mul_left_self_sup : (J * I) ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 ideal.mul_le_left
variables (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 $ λ r hrI s hsJ, mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 $ λ r hrJ s hsI, mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
protected theorem mul_assoc : (I * J) * K = I * (J * K) :=
submodule.smul_assoc I J K
theorem span_mul_span (S T : set R) : span S * span T =
span ⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t} :=
submodule.span_smul_span S T
variables {I J K}
lemma span_mul_span' (S T : set R) : span S * span T = span (S*T) :=
by { unfold span, rw submodule.span_mul_span, }
lemma span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : ideal R) :=
by { unfold span, rw [submodule.span_mul_span, set.singleton_mul_singleton], }
lemma span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ):
span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : ideal R) :=
begin
induction n with n ih, { simp [set.singleton_one], },
simp only [pow_succ, ih, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton],
end
lemma mem_mul_span_singleton {x y : R} {I : ideal R} :
x ∈ I * span {y} ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, z * y = x :=
submodule.mem_smul_span_singleton
lemma mem_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I : ideal R} :
x ∈ span {y} * I ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, y * z = x :=
by simp only [mul_comm, mem_mul_span_singleton]
lemma le_span_singleton_mul_iff {x : R} {I J : ideal R} :
I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (hzI : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ span {x} * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI,
by simp only [mem_span_singleton_mul]
lemma span_singleton_mul_le_iff {x : R} {I J : ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J :=
begin
simp only [mul_le, mem_span_singleton_mul, mem_span_singleton],
split,
{ intros h zI hzI,
exact h x (dvd_refl x) zI hzI },
{ rintros h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩ zI hzI,
rw [mul_comm x z, mul_assoc],
exact J.mul_mem_left _ (h zI hzI) },
end
lemma span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I J : ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ span {y} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ :=
by simp only [span_singleton_mul_le_iff, mem_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
lemma eq_span_singleton_mul {x : R} (I J : ideal R) :
I = span {x} * J ↔ ((∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI) ∧ (∀ z ∈ J, x * z ∈ I)) :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_mul_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_iff]
lemma span_singleton_mul_eq_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} (I J : ideal R) :
span {x} * I = span {y} * J ↔
((∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ) ∧
(∀ zJ ∈ J, ∃ zI ∈ I, x * zI = y * zJ)) :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsj, ⟨I.mul_mem_right s hri, J.mul_mem_left r hsj⟩
theorem multiset_prod_le_inf {s : multiset (ideal R)} :
s.prod ≤ s.inf :=
begin
classical, refine s.induction_on _ _,
{ rw [multiset.inf_zero], exact le_top },
intros a s ih,
rw [multiset.prod_cons, multiset.inf_cons],
exact le_trans mul_le_inf (inf_le_inf (le_refl _) ih)
end
theorem prod_le_inf {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} : s.prod f ≤ s.inf f :=
multiset_prod_le_inf
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf $ λ r ⟨hri, hrj⟩,
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h) in
mul_one r ▸ hst ▸ (mul_add r s t).symm ▸ ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj)
(mul_mem_mul hri htj)
variables (I)
@[simp] theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
submodule.smul_bot I
@[simp] theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ :=
submodule.bot_smul I
@[simp] theorem mul_top : I * ⊤ = I :=
ideal.mul_comm ⊤ I ▸ submodule.top_smul I
@[simp] theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
submodule.top_smul I
variables {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
submodule.smul_mono_right h
variables (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
submodule.sup_smul I J K
variables {I J K}
lemma pow_le_pow {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
I^n ≤ I^m :=
begin
cases nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with k hk,
rw [hk, pow_add],
exact le_trans (mul_le_inf) (inf_le_left)
end
lemma mul_eq_bot {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [integral_domain R] {I J : ideal R} :
I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨λ hij, or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr (λ I_ne_bot, J.eq_bot_iff.mpr (λ j hj,
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot in
or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0)),
λ h, by cases h; rw [← ideal.mul_bot, h, ideal.mul_comm]⟩
instance {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [integral_domain R] : no_zero_divisors (ideal R) :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ I J, mul_eq_bot.1 }
/-- A product of ideals in an integral domain is zero if and only if one of the terms is zero. -/
lemma prod_eq_bot {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [integral_domain R]
{s : multiset (ideal R)} : s.prod = ⊥ ↔ ∃ I ∈ s, I = ⊥ :=
prod_zero_iff_exists_zero
/-- The radical of an ideal `I` consists of the elements `r` such that `r^n ∈ I` for some `n`. -/
def radical (I : ideal R) : ideal R :=
{ carrier := { r | ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I },
zero_mem' := ⟨1, (pow_one (0:R)).symm ▸ I.zero_mem⟩,
add_mem' := λ x y ⟨m, hxmi⟩ ⟨n, hyni⟩, ⟨m + n,
(add_pow x y (m + n)).symm ▸ I.sum_mem $
show ∀ c ∈ finset.range (nat.succ (m + n)),
x ^ c * y ^ (m + n - c) * (nat.choose (m + n) c) ∈ I,
from λ c hc, or.cases_on (le_total c m)
(λ hcm, I.mul_mem_right _ $ I.mul_mem_left _ $ nat.add_comm n m ▸
(nat.add_sub_assoc hcm n).symm ▸
(pow_add y n (m-c)).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hyni)
(λ hmc, I.mul_mem_right _ $ I.mul_mem_right _ $ add_sub_cancel_of_le hmc ▸
(pow_add x m (c-m)).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hxmi)⟩,
smul_mem' := λ r s ⟨n, hsni⟩, ⟨n, (mul_pow r s n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_left (r^n) hsni⟩ }
theorem le_radical : I ≤ radical I :=
λ r hri, ⟨1, (pow_one r).symm ▸ hri⟩
variables (R)
theorem radical_top : (radical ⊤ : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 ⟨0, submodule.mem_top⟩
variables {R}
theorem radical_mono (H : I ≤ J) : radical I ≤ radical J :=
λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, ⟨n, H hrni⟩
variables (I)
@[simp] theorem radical_idem : radical (radical I) = radical I :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, k, hrnki⟩, ⟨n * k, (pow_mul r n k).symm ▸ hrnki⟩) le_radical
variables {I}
theorem radical_le_radical_iff : radical I ≤ radical J ↔ I ≤ radical J :=
⟨λ h, le_trans le_radical h, λ h, radical_idem J ▸ radical_mono h⟩
theorem radical_eq_top : radical I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨λ h, (eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (eq_top_iff_one _).1 h in
@one_pow R _ n ▸ hn, λ h, h.symm ▸ radical_top R⟩
theorem is_prime.radical (H : is_prime I) : radical I = I :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, H.mem_of_pow_mem n hrni) le_radical
variables (I J)
theorem radical_sup : radical (I ⊔ J) = radical (radical I ⊔ radical J) :=
le_antisymm (radical_mono $ sup_le_sup le_radical le_radical) $
λ r ⟨n, hrnij⟩, let ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrnij in
@radical_idem _ _ (I ⊔ J) ▸ ⟨n, hst ▸ ideal.add_mem _
(radical_mono le_sup_left hs) (radical_mono le_sup_right ht)⟩
theorem radical_inf : radical (I ⊓ J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (radical_mono inf_le_left) (radical_mono inf_le_right))
(λ r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩, ⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hrm,
(pow_add r m n).symm ▸ J.mul_mem_left _ hrn⟩)
theorem radical_mul : radical (I * J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (radical_inf I J ▸ radical_mono $ @mul_le_inf _ _ I J)
(λ r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩, ⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ mul_mem_mul hrm hrn⟩)
variables {I J}
theorem is_prime.radical_le_iff (hj : is_prime J) :
radical I ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨le_trans le_radical, λ hij r ⟨n, hrni⟩, hj.mem_of_pow_mem n $ hij hrni⟩
theorem radical_eq_Inf (I : ideal R) :
radical I = Inf { J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_prime J } :=
le_antisymm (le_Inf $ λ J hJ, hJ.2.radical_le_iff.2 hJ.1) $
λ r hr, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hri,
let ⟨m, (hrm : r ∉ radical m), him, hm⟩ := zorn.zorn_nonempty_partial_order₀
{K : ideal R | r ∉ radical K}
(λ c hc hcc y hyc, ⟨Sup c, λ ⟨n, hrnc⟩, let ⟨y, hyc, hrny⟩ :=
(submodule.mem_Sup_of_directed ⟨y, hyc⟩ hcc.directed_on).1 hrnc in hc hyc ⟨n, hrny⟩,
λ z, le_Sup⟩) I hri in
have ∀ x ∉ m, r ∈ radical (m ⊔ span {x}) := λ x hxm, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hrmx, hxm $
hm (m ⊔ span {x}) hrmx le_sup_left ▸ (le_sup_right : _ ≤ m ⊔ span {x})
(subset_span $ set.mem_singleton _),
have is_prime m, from ⟨by rintro rfl; rw radical_top at hrm; exact hrm trivial,
λ x y hxym, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hxm, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hym,
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := this _ hxm,
⟨p, hpm, q, hq, hpqrn⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrn,
⟨c, hcxq⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hq in
let ⟨k, hrk⟩ := this _ hym,
⟨f, hfm, g, hg, hfgrk⟩ := submodule.mem_sup.1 hrk,
⟨d, hdyg⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hg in
hrm ⟨n + k, by rw [pow_add, ← hpqrn, ← hcxq, ← hfgrk, ← hdyg, add_mul, mul_add (c*x),
mul_assoc c x (d*y), mul_left_comm x, ← mul_assoc];
refine m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_right _ hpm) (m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_left _ hfm)
(m.mul_mem_left _ hxym))⟩⟩,
hrm $ this.radical.symm ▸ (Inf_le ⟨him, this⟩ : Inf {J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ is_prime J} ≤ m) hr
@[simp] lemma radical_bot_of_integral_domain {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] [integral_domain R] :
radical (⊥ : ideal R) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 (λ x hx, hx.rec_on (λ n hn, pow_eq_zero hn))
instance : comm_semiring (ideal R) := submodule.comm_semiring
variables (R)
theorem top_pow (n : ℕ) : (⊤ ^ n : ideal R) = ⊤ :=
nat.rec_on n one_eq_top $ λ n ih, by rw [pow_succ, ih, top_mul]
variables {R}
variables (I)
theorem radical_pow (n : ℕ) (H : n > 0) : radical (I^n) = radical I :=
nat.rec_on n (not.elim dec_trivial) (λ n ih H,
or.cases_on (lt_or_eq_of_le $ nat.le_of_lt_succ H)
(λ H, calc radical (I^(n+1))
= radical I ⊓ radical (I^n) : by { rw pow_succ, exact radical_mul _ _ }
... = radical I ⊓ radical I : by rw ih H
... = radical I : inf_idem)
(λ H, H ▸ (pow_one I).symm ▸ rfl)) H
theorem is_prime.mul_le {I J P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P) :
I * J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hip j hj, let ⟨i, hi, hip⟩ := set.not_subset.1 hip in
(hp.mem_or_mem $ h $ mul_mem_mul hi hj).resolve_left hip,
λ h, or.cases_on h (le_trans $ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_left)
(le_trans $ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_right)⟩
theorem is_prime.inf_le {I J P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P) :
I ⊓ J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, hp.mul_le.1 $ le_trans mul_le_inf h,
λ h, or.cases_on h (le_trans inf_le_left) (le_trans inf_le_right)⟩
theorem is_prime.multiset_prod_le {s : multiset (ideal R)} {P : ideal R}
(hp : is_prime P) (hne : s ≠ 0) :
s.prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ I ∈ s, I ≤ P :=
suffices s.prod ≤ P → ∃ I ∈ s, I ≤ P,
from ⟨this, λ ⟨i, his, hip⟩, le_trans multiset_prod_le_inf $
le_trans (multiset.inf_le his) hip⟩,
begin
classical,
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b, b ∈ s := multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero hne,
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, s = b ::ₘ t,
from ⟨s.erase b, (multiset.cons_erase hb).symm⟩,
refine t.induction_on _ _,
{ simp only [exists_prop, ←multiset.singleton_eq_cons, multiset.prod_singleton,
multiset.mem_singleton, exists_eq_left, imp_self] },
intros a s ih h,
rw [multiset.cons_swap, multiset.prod_cons, hp.mul_le] at h,
rw multiset.cons_swap,
cases h,
{ exact ⟨a, multiset.mem_cons_self a _, h⟩ },
obtain ⟨I, hI, ih⟩ : ∃ I ∈ b ::ₘ s, I ≤ P := ih h,
exact ⟨I, multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hI, ih⟩
end
theorem is_prime.multiset_prod_map_le {s : multiset ι} (f : ι → ideal R) {P : ideal R}
(hp : is_prime P) (hne : s ≠ 0) :
(s.map f).prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
begin
rw hp.multiset_prod_le (mt multiset.map_eq_zero.mp hne),
simp_rw [exists_prop, multiset.mem_map, exists_exists_and_eq_and],
end
theorem is_prime.prod_le {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {P : ideal R}
(hp : is_prime P) (hne : s.nonempty) :
s.prod f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
hp.multiset_prod_map_le f (mt finset.val_eq_zero.mp hne.ne_empty)
theorem is_prime.inf_le' {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {P : ideal R} (hp : is_prime P)
(hsne: s.nonempty) :
s.inf f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
⟨λ h, (hp.prod_le hsne).1 $ le_trans prod_le_inf h,
λ ⟨i, his, hip⟩, le_trans (finset.inf_le his) hip⟩
theorem subset_union {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {I J K : ideal R} :
(I : set R) ⊆ J ∪ K ↔ I ≤ J ∨ I ≤ K :=
⟨λ h, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hij s hsi,
let ⟨r, hri, hrj⟩ := set.not_subset.1 hij in classical.by_contradiction $ λ hsk,
or.cases_on (h $ I.add_mem hri hsi)
(λ hj, hrj $ add_sub_cancel r s ▸ J.sub_mem hj ((h hsi).resolve_right hsk))
(λ hk, hsk $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ K.sub_mem hk ((h hri).resolve_left hrj)),
λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset_union_left J K)
(λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset_union_right J K)⟩
theorem subset_union_prime' {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} {a b : ι}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, is_prime (f i)) {I : ideal R} :
(I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) ↔ I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i :=
suffices (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) →
I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i,
from ⟨this, λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset.trans
(set.subset_union_left _ _) (set.subset_union_left _ _)) $
λ h, or.cases_on h (λ h, set.subset.trans h $ set.subset.trans
(set.subset_union_right _ _) (set.subset_union_left _ _)) $
λ ⟨i, his, hi⟩, by refine (set.subset.trans hi $ set.subset.trans _ $
set.subset_union_right _ _);
exact set.subset_bUnion_of_mem (finset.mem_coe.2 his)⟩,
begin
generalize hn : s.card = n, intros h,
unfreezingI { induction n with n ih generalizing a b s },
{ clear hp,
rw finset.card_eq_zero at hn, subst hn,
rw [finset.coe_empty, set.bUnion_empty, set.union_empty, subset_union] at h,
simpa only [exists_prop, finset.not_mem_empty, false_and, exists_false, or_false] },
classical,
replace hn : ∃ (i : ι) (t : finset ι), i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s ∧ t.card = n :=
finset.card_eq_succ.1 hn,
unfreezingI { rcases hn with ⟨i, t, hit, rfl, hn⟩ },
replace hp : is_prime (f i) ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, is_prime (f x) := (t.forall_mem_insert _ _).1 hp,
by_cases Ht : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i,
{ obtain ⟨j, hjt, hfji⟩ : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i := Ht,
obtain ⟨u, hju, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, j ∉ u ∧ insert j u = t,
{ exact ⟨t.erase j, t.not_mem_erase j, finset.insert_erase hjt⟩ },
have hp' : ∀ k ∈ insert i u, is_prime (f k),
{ rw finset.forall_mem_insert at hp ⊢, exact ⟨hp.1, hp.2.2⟩ },
have hiu : i ∉ u := mt finset.mem_insert_of_mem hit,
have hn' : (insert i u).card = n,
{ rwa finset.card_insert_of_not_mem at hn ⊢, exacts [hiu, hju] },
have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ k ∈ (↑(insert i u) : set ι), f k),
{ rw finset.coe_insert at h ⊢, rw finset.coe_insert at h,
simp only [set.bUnion_insert] at h ⊢,
rw [← set.union_assoc ↑(f i)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right hfji] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih a b (insert i u) hp' hn' h',
refine ih.imp id (or.imp id (exists_imp_exists $ λ k, _)), simp only [exists_prop],
exact and.imp (λ hk, finset.insert_subset_insert i (finset.subset_insert j u) hk) id },
by_cases Ha : f a ≤ f i,
{ have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f i ∪ f b ∪ (⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j),
{ rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_assoc,
set.union_right_comm ↑(f a)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Ha] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih i b t hp.2 hn h', right,
rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩ },
{ exact or.inl ih },
{ exact or.inr ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩ } },
by_cases Hb : f b ≤ f i,
{ have h' : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f i ∪ (⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j),
{ rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_assoc, set.union_assoc ↑(f a)] at h,
erw [set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Hb] at h,
exact h },
specialize @ih a i t hp.2 hn h',
rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ exact or.inl ih },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩) } },
by_cases Hi : I ≤ f i,
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_insert_self i t, Hi⟩) },
have : ¬I ⊓ f a ⊓ f b ⊓ t.inf f ≤ f i,
{ rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hsne),
{ rw [finset.inf_empty, inf_top_eq, hp.1.inf_le, hp.1.inf_le, not_or_distrib, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨⟨Hi, Ha⟩, Hb⟩ },
simp only [hp.1.inf_le, hp.1.inf_le' hsne, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨⟨⟨Hi, Ha⟩, Hb⟩, Ht⟩ },
rcases set.not_subset.1 this with ⟨r, ⟨⟨⟨hrI, hra⟩, hrb⟩, hr⟩, hri⟩,
by_cases HI : (I : set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : set ι), f j,
{ specialize ih hp.2 hn HI, rcases ih with ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩,
{ left, exact ih }, { right, left, exact ih },
{ right, right, exact ⟨k, finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩ } },
exfalso, rcases set.not_subset.1 HI with ⟨s, hsI, hs⟩,
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert] at h,
have hsi : s ∈ f i := ((h hsI).resolve_left (mt or.inl hs)).resolve_right (mt or.inr hs),
rcases h (I.add_mem hrI hsI) with ⟨ha | hb⟩ | hi | ht,
{ exact hs (or.inl $ or.inl $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f a).sub_mem ha hra) },
{ exact hs (or.inl $ or.inr $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f b).sub_mem hb hrb) },
{ exact hri (add_sub_cancel r s ▸ (f i).sub_mem hi hsi) },
{ rw set.mem_bUnion_iff at ht, rcases ht with ⟨j, hjt, hj⟩,
simp only [finset.inf_eq_infi, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_infi] at hr,
exact hs (or.inr $ set.mem_bUnion hjt $ add_sub_cancel' r s ▸ (f j).sub_mem hj $ hr j hjt) }
end
/-- Prime avoidance. Atiyah-Macdonald 1.11, Eisenbud 3.3, Stacks 00DS, Matsumura Ex.1.6. -/
theorem subset_union_prime {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ideal R} (a b : ι)
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ a → i ≠ b → is_prime (f i)) {I : ideal R} :
(I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i :=
suffices (I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i) → ∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ I ≤ f i,
from ⟨λ h, bex_def.2 $ this h, λ ⟨i, his, hi⟩, set.subset.trans hi $ set.subset_bUnion_of_mem $
show i ∈ (↑s : set ι), from his⟩,
assume h : (I : set R) ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (↑s : set ι), f i),
begin
classical, tactic.unfreeze_local_instances,
by_cases has : a ∈ s,
{ obtain ⟨t, hat, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s :=
⟨s.erase a, finset.not_mem_erase a s, finset.insert_erase has⟩,
by_cases hbt : b ∈ t,
{ obtain ⟨u, hbu, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, b ∉ u ∧ insert b u = t :=
⟨t.erase b, finset.not_mem_erase b t, finset.insert_erase hbt⟩,
have hp' : ∀ i ∈ u, is_prime (f i),
{ intros i hiu, refine hp i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hiu)) _ _;
rintro rfl; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, set.bUnion_insert,
← set.union_assoc, subset_union_prime' hp', bex_def] at h,
rwa [finset.exists_mem_insert, finset.exists_mem_insert] },
{ have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
rintro rfl; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f a : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert } },
{ by_cases hbs : b ∈ s,
{ obtain ⟨t, hbt, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, b ∉ t ∧ insert b t = s :=
⟨s.erase b, finset.not_mem_erase b s, finset.insert_erase hbs⟩,
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
rintro rfl; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f b : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert },
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hse hsne,
{ subst hse, rw [finset.coe_empty, set.bUnion_empty, set.subset_empty_iff] at h,
have : (I : set R) ≠ ∅ := set.nonempty.ne_empty (set.nonempty_of_mem I.zero_mem),
exact absurd h this },
{ cases hsne.bex with i his,
obtain ⟨t, hit, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s :=
⟨s.erase i, finset.not_mem_erase i s, finset.insert_erase his⟩,
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, is_prime (f j),
{ intros j hj, refine hp j (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) _ _;
rintro rfl; solve_by_elim only [finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *], },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.bUnion_insert, ← set.union_self (f i : set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self, bex_def] at h,
rwa finset.exists_mem_insert } }
end
section dvd
/-- If `I` divides `J`, then `I` contains `J`.
In a Dedekind domain, to divide and contain are equivalent, see `ideal.dvd_iff_le`.
-/
lemma le_of_dvd {I J : ideal R} : I ∣ J → J ≤ I
| ⟨K, h⟩ := h.symm ▸ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_left
lemma is_unit_iff {I : ideal R} :
is_unit I ↔ I = ⊤ :=
is_unit_iff_dvd_one.trans ((@one_eq_top R _).symm ▸
⟨λ h, eq_top_iff.mpr (ideal.le_of_dvd h), λ h, ⟨⊤, by rw [mul_top, h]⟩⟩)
instance unique_units : unique (units (ideal R)) :=
{ default := 1,
uniq := λ u, units.ext
(show (u : ideal R) = 1, by rw [is_unit_iff.mp u.is_unit, one_eq_top]) }
end dvd
end mul_and_radical
section map_and_comap
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] [semiring S]
variables (f : R →+* S)
variables {I J : ideal R} {K L : ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : ideal R) : ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap (I : ideal S) : ideal R :=
{ carrier := f ⁻¹' I,
smul_mem' := λ c x hx, show f (c * x) ∈ I, by { rw f.map_mul, exact I.mul_mem_left _ hx },
.. I.to_add_submonoid.comap (f : R →+ S) }
variables {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono $ set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : R →+* S) {I : ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
lemma apply_coe_mem_map (f : R →+* S) (I : ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap :
map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans set.image_subset_iff
@[simp] theorem mem_comap {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K := iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
set.preimage_mono (λ x hx, h hx)
variables (f)
theorem comap_ne_top (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 $ by rw [mem_comap, f.map_one];
exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
instance is_prime.comap [hK : K.is_prime] : (comap f K).is_prime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, λ x y,
by simp only [mem_comap, f.map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variables (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ subset_span ⟨1, trivial, f.map_one⟩
variable (f)
lemma gc_map_comap : galois_connection (ideal.map f) (ideal.comap f) :=
λ I J, ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp] lemma comap_id : I.comap (ring_hom.id R) = I :=
ideal.ext $ λ _, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma map_id : I.map (ring_hom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (ring_hom.id R)).l_unique galois_connection.id comap_id
lemma comap_comap {T : Type*} [ring T] {I : ideal T} (f : R →+* S)
(g : S →+*T) : (I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) := rfl
lemma map_map {T : Type*} [ring T] {I : ideal R} (f : R →+* S)
(g : S →+*T) : (I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose _ _ _ _ (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique
(gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) (λ _, comap_comap _ _)
lemma map_span (f : R →+* S) (s : set R) :
map f (span s) = span (f '' s) :=
symm $ submodule.span_eq_of_le _
(λ y ⟨x, hy, x_eq⟩, x_eq ▸ mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hy))
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ span_le.2 $ set.image_subset_iff.1 subset_span)
variables {f I J K L}
lemma map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
lemma le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
lemma le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
lemma map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp] lemma comap_top : (⊤ : ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp] lemma comap_eq_top_iff {I : ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨ λ h, I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (f.map_one ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
λ h, by rw [h, comap_top] ⟩
@[simp] lemma map_bot : (⊥ : ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
variables (f I J K L)
@[simp] lemma map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
congr_fun (gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp] lemma comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
congr_fun (gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
lemma map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L := rfl
variables {ι : Sort*}
lemma map_supr (K : ι → ideal R) : (supr K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_supr
lemma comap_infi (K : ι → ideal S) : (infi K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_infi
lemma map_Sup (s : set (ideal R)): (Sup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_Sup
lemma comap_Inf (s : set (ideal S)): (Inf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_Inf
lemma comap_Inf' (s : set (ideal S)) : (Inf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ (comap f '' s), I :=
trans (comap_Inf f s) (by rw infi_image)
theorem comap_is_prime [H : is_prime K] : is_prime (comap f K) :=
⟨comap_ne_top f H.ne_top,
λ x y h, H.mem_or_mem $ by rwa [mem_comap, ring_hom.map_mul] at h⟩
variables {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
section surjective
variables (hf : function.surjective f)
include hf
open function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : ideal S) :
map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (le_refl _))
(λ s hsi, let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s in
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f $ show f r ∈ I, from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi))
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def gi_map_comap : galois_insertion (map f) (comap f) :=
galois_insertion.monotone_intro
((gc_map_comap f).monotone_u)
((gc_map_comap f).monotone_l)
(λ _, le_comap_map)
(map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
lemma map_surjective_of_surjective : surjective (map f) :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_surjective
lemma comap_injective_of_surjective : injective (comap f) :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).u_injective
lemma map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
lemma map_supr_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → ideal S) : (⨆i, (K i).comap f).map f = supr K :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_supr_u _
lemma map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
lemma map_infi_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → ideal S) : (⨅i, (K i).comap f).map f = infi K :=
(gi_map_comap f hf).l_infi_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : ideal R} {y}
(H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
submodule.span_induction H (λ _, id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, f.map_zero⟩
(λ y1 y2 ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩,
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ f.map_add _ _⟩)
(λ c y ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩, let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c in ⟨d • x, I.smul_mem _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ f.map_mul _ _⟩)
lemma mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : ideal R} {y} :
y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨λ h, (set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h),
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, hx.right ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f hx.left)⟩
lemma le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I :=
λ h, (map_comap_of_surjective f hf K) ▸ map_mono h
end surjective
section injective
variables (hf : function.injective f)
include hf
lemma comap_bot_le_of_injective : comap f ⊥ ≤ I :=
begin
refine le_trans (λ x hx, _) bot_le,
rw [mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot, ← ring_hom.map_zero f] at hx,
exact eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ (submodule.zero_mem ⊥)
end
end injective
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] [ring S] (f : R →+* S) {I : ideal R}
section surjective
variables (hf : function.surjective f)
include hf
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (I : ideal R) : comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm (assume r h, let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h in
submodule.mem_sup.2 ⟨s, hsi, r - s, (submodule.mem_bot S).2 $ by rw [f.map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel'_right s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 (le_refl _)) (comap_mono bot_le))
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def rel_iso_of_surjective : ideal S ≃o { p : ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } :=
{ to_fun := λ J, ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩,
inv_fun := λ I, map f I.1,
left_inv := λ J, map_comap_of_surjective f hf J,
right_inv := λ I, subtype.eq $ show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1,
from (comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm
(sup_le (le_refl _) I.2) le_sup_left,
map_rel_iff' := λ I1 I2, ⟨λ H, map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸
map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H, comap_mono⟩ }
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def order_embedding_of_surjective : ideal S ↪o ideal R :=
(rel_iso_of_surjective f hf).to_rel_embedding.trans (subtype.rel_embedding _ _)
theorem map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective {I : ideal R} (H : is_maximal I) :
(map f I) = ⊤ ∨ is_maximal (map f I) :=
begin
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (λ ne_top, ⟨⟨λ h, ne_top h, λ J hJ, _⟩⟩),
{ refine (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf).injective
(subtype.ext_iff.2 (eq.trans (H.1.2 (comap f J) (lt_of_le_of_ne _ _)) comap_top.symm)),
{ exact (map_le_iff_le_comap).1 (le_of_lt hJ) },
{ exact λ h, hJ.right (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf (le_of_eq h.symm)) } }
end
theorem comap_is_maximal_of_surjective {K : ideal S} [H : is_maximal K] : is_maximal (comap f K) :=
begin
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, λ J hJ, _⟩⟩,
suffices : map f J = ⊤,
{ replace this := congr_arg (comap f) this,
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this,
rw eq_top_iff,
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono (bot_le)) (le_of_lt hJ))) },
refine H.1.2 (map f J) (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ))
(λ h, ne_of_lt hJ (trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) _))),
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left],
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
end
end surjective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `map f (map f.symm) = I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma map_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : (I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I :=
by simp [← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, map_map]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `comap f.symm (comap f) = I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma comap_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I :=
by simp [← ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, comap_comap]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
lemma map_comap_of_equiv (I : ideal R) (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (le_comap_of_map_le (map_of_equiv I f).le)
(le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ f.surjective (comap_of_equiv I f).le)
section bijective
variables (hf : function.bijective f)
include hf
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def rel_iso_of_bijective : ideal S ≃o ideal R :=
{ to_fun := comap f,
inv_fun := map f,
left_inv := (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).left_inv,
right_inv := λ J, subtype.ext_iff.1
((rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).right_inv ⟨J, comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf.left⟩),
map_rel_iff' := (rel_iso_of_surjective f hf.right).map_rel_iff' }
lemma comap_le_iff_le_map {I : ideal R} {K : ideal S} : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨λ h, le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h,
λ h, ((rel_iso_of_bijective f hf).right_inv I) ▸ comap_mono h⟩
theorem map.is_maximal {I : ideal R} (H : is_maximal I) : is_maximal (map f I) :=
by refine or_iff_not_imp_left.1
(map_eq_top_or_is_maximal_of_surjective f hf.right H) (λ h, H.1.1 _);
calc I = comap f (map f I) : ((rel_iso_of_bijective f hf).right_inv I).symm
... = comap f ⊤ : by rw h
... = ⊤ : by rw comap_top
end bijective
lemma ring_equiv.bot_maximal_iff (e : R ≃+* S) :
(⊥ : ideal R).is_maximal ↔ (⊥ : ideal S).is_maximal :=
⟨λ h, (@map_bot _ _ _ _ e.to_ring_hom) ▸ map.is_maximal e.to_ring_hom e.bijective h,
λ h, (@map_bot _ _ _ _ e.symm.to_ring_hom) ▸ map.is_maximal e.symm.to_ring_hom e.symm.bijective h⟩
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
variables (f : R →+* S)
variables {I J : ideal R} {K L : ideal S}
lemma mem_quotient_iff_mem (hIJ : I ≤ J) {x : R} :
quotient.mk I x ∈ J.map (quotient.mk I) ↔ x ∈ J :=
begin
refine iff.trans (mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ quotient.mk_surjective) _,
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, x_mem, x_eq⟩,
simpa using J.add_mem (hIJ (quotient.eq.mp x_eq.symm)) x_mem },
{ intro x_mem,
exact ⟨x, x_mem, rfl⟩ }
end
variables (I J K L)
theorem map_mul : map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ mul_le.2 $ λ r hri s hsj,
show f (r * s) ∈ _, by rw f.map_mul;
exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(trans_rel_right _ (span_mul_span _ _) $ span_le.2 $
set.bUnion_subset $ λ i ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩,
set.bUnion_subset $ λ j ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩,
set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $ hfri ▸ hfsj ▸
by rw [← f.map_mul];
exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj))
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) :=
le_antisymm (λ r ⟨n, hfrnk⟩, ⟨n, show f (r ^ n) ∈ K,
from (f.map_pow r n).symm ▸ hfrnk⟩)
(λ r ⟨n, hfrnk⟩, ⟨n, f.map_pow r n ▸ hfrnk⟩)
@[simp] lemma map_quotient_self :
map (quotient.mk I) I = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ x hx,
(submodule.mem_bot I.quotient).2 $ ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 hx
variables {I J K L}
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ λ r ⟨n, hrni⟩, ⟨n, f.map_pow r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ (map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_refl _) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_refl _)
end comm_ring
end map_and_comap
section is_primary
variables {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R]
/-- A proper ideal `I` is primary iff `xy ∈ I` implies `x ∈ I` or `y ∈ radical I`. -/
def is_primary (I : ideal R) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ {x y : R}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ radical I
theorem is_primary.to_is_prime (I : ideal R) (hi : is_prime I) : is_primary I :=
⟨hi.1, λ x y hxy, (hi.mem_or_mem hxy).imp id $ λ hyi, le_radical hyi⟩
theorem mem_radical_of_pow_mem {I : ideal R} {x : R} {m : ℕ} (hx : x ^ m ∈ radical I) :
x ∈ radical I :=
radical_idem I ▸ ⟨m, hx⟩
theorem is_prime_radical {I : ideal R} (hi : is_primary I) : is_prime (radical I) :=
⟨mt radical_eq_top.1 hi.1, λ x y ⟨m, hxy⟩, begin
rw mul_pow at hxy, cases hi.2 hxy,
{ exact or.inl ⟨m, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inr (mem_radical_of_pow_mem h) }
end⟩
theorem is_primary_inf {I J : ideal R} (hi : is_primary I) (hj : is_primary J)
(hij : radical I = radical J) : is_primary (I ⊓ J) :=
⟨ne_of_lt $ lt_of_le_of_lt inf_le_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hi.1), λ x y ⟨hxyi, hxyj⟩,
begin
rw [radical_inf, hij, inf_idem],
cases hi.2 hxyi with hxi hyi, cases hj.2 hxyj with hxj hyj,
{ exact or.inl ⟨hxi, hxj⟩ },
{ exact or.inr hyj },
{ rw hij at hyi, exact or.inr hyi }
end⟩
end is_primary
end ideal
namespace ring_hom
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] [semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : ideal R := ideal.comap f ⊥
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero.-/
lemma mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 :=
by rw [ker, ideal.mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot]
lemma ker_eq : ((ker f) : set R) = set.preimage f {0} := rfl
lemma ker_eq_comap_bot (f : R →+* S) : f.ker = ideal.comap f ⊥ := rfl
/-- If the target is not the zero ring, then one is not in the kernel.-/
lemma not_one_mem_ker [nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) : (1:R) ∉ ker f :=
by { rw [mem_ker, f.map_one], exact one_ne_zero }
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] [semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
lemma injective_iff_ker_eq_bot : function.injective f ↔ ker f = ⊥ :=
by { rw [set_like.ext'_iff, ker_eq, set.ext_iff], exact f.injective_iff' }
lemma ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero : ker f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 → x = 0 :=
by { rw [← f.injective_iff, injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] }
@[simp] lemma ker_coe_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) : ker (f : R →+* S) = ⊥ :=
by simpa only [←injective_iff_ker_eq_bot] using f.injective
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse`) /
is surjective (`quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective`).
-/
def ker_lift (f : R →+* S) : f.ker.quotient →+* S :=
ideal.quotient.lift _ f $ λ r, f.mem_ker.mp
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_mk (f : R →+* S) (r : R) : ker_lift f (ideal.quotient.mk f.ker r) = f r :=
ideal.quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
/-- The induced map from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
lemma ker_lift_injective (f : R →+* S) : function.injective (ker_lift f) :=
assume a b, quotient.induction_on₂' a b $
assume a b (h : f a = f b), quotient.sound' $
show a - b ∈ ker f, by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, h, sub_self]
variable {f}
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings, computable version. -/
def quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse
{g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f) :
f.ker.quotient ≃+* S :=
{ to_fun := ker_lift f,
inv_fun := (ideal.quotient.mk f.ker) ∘ g,
left_inv := begin
rintro ⟨x⟩,
apply ker_lift_injective,
simp [hf (f x)],
end,
right_inv := hf,
..ker_lift f}
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply {g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f)
(x : f.ker.quotient) : quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse hf x = ker_lift f x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse.symm.apply {g : S → R} (hf : function.right_inverse g f)
(x : S) : (quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse hf).symm x = ideal.quotient.mk f.ker (g x) := rfl
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for commutative rings. -/
noncomputable def quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective (hf : function.surjective f) :
f.ker.quotient ≃+* S :=
quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse (classical.some_spec hf.has_right_inverse)
end comm_ring
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to an integral domain is a prime ideal. -/
lemma ker_is_prime [ring R] [comm_ring S] [integral_domain S] (f : R →+* S) :
(ker f).is_prime :=
⟨by { rw [ne.def, ideal.eq_top_iff_one], exact not_one_mem_ker f },
λ x y, by simpa only [mem_ker, f.map_mul] using @eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero S _ _ _ _ _⟩
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a field is a maximal ideal. -/
lemma ker_is_maximal_of_surjective {R K : Type*} [ring R] [field K]
(f : R →+* K) (hf : function.surjective f) :
f.ker.is_maximal :=
begin
refine ideal.is_maximal_iff.mpr
⟨λ h1, @one_ne_zero K _ _ $ f.map_one ▸ f.mem_ker.mp h1,
λ J x hJ hxf hxJ, _⟩,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf (f x)⁻¹,
have H : 1 = y * x - (y * x - 1) := (sub_sub_cancel _ _).symm,
rw H,
refine J.sub_mem (J.mul_mem_left _ hxJ) (hJ _),
rw f.mem_ker,
simp only [hy, ring_hom.map_sub, ring_hom.map_one, ring_hom.map_mul,
inv_mul_cancel (mt f.mem_ker.mpr hxf), sub_self],
end
end ring_hom
namespace ideal
variables {R : Type*} {S : Type*}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] [semiring S]
lemma map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker {I : ideal R} (f : R →+* S) : I.map f = ⊥ ↔ I ≤ f.ker :=
by rw [ring_hom.ker, eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap]
lemma ker_le_comap {K : ideal S} (f : R →+* S) : f.ker ≤ comap f K :=
λ x hx, mem_comap.2 (((ring_hom.mem_ker f).1 hx).symm ▸ K.zero_mem)
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] [ring S]
lemma map_Inf {A : set (ideal R)} {f : R →+* S} (hf : function.surjective f) :
(∀ J ∈ A, ring_hom.ker f ≤ J) → map f (Inf A) = Inf (map f '' A) :=
begin
refine λ h, le_antisymm (le_Inf _) _,
{ intros j hj y hy,
cases (mem_map_iff_of_surjective f hf).1 hy with x hx,
cases (set.mem_image _ _ _).mp hj with J hJ,
rw [← hJ.right, ← hx.right],
exact mem_map_of_mem f (Inf_le_of_le hJ.left (le_of_eq rfl) hx.left) },
{ intros y hy,
cases hf y with x hx,
refine hx ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f _),
have : ∀ I ∈ A, y ∈ map f I, by simpa using hy,
rw [submodule.mem_Inf],
intros J hJ,
rcases (mem_map_iff_of_surjective f hf).1 (this J hJ) with ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩,
have : x - x' ∈ J,
{ apply h J hJ,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ring_hom.map_sub, hx, sub_self] },
simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using J.add_mem this hx' }
end
theorem map_is_prime_of_surjective {f : R →+* S} (hf : function.surjective f) {I : ideal R}
[H : is_prime I] (hk : ring_hom.ker f ≤ I) : is_prime (map f I) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, H.ne_top (eq_top_iff.2 _), λ x y, _⟩,
{ replace h := congr_arg (comap f) h,
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, comap_top] at h,
exact h ▸ sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) hk },
{ refine λ hxy, (hf x).rec_on (λ a ha, (hf y).rec_on (λ b hb, _)),
rw [← ha, ← hb, ← ring_hom.map_mul, mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ hf] at hxy,
rcases hxy with ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← ring_hom.map_sub] at hc',
have : a * b ∈ I,
{ convert I.sub_mem hc (hk (hc' : c - a * b ∈ f.ker)),
abel },
exact (H.mem_or_mem this).imp (λ h, ha ▸ mem_map_of_mem f h) (λ h, hb ▸ mem_map_of_mem f h) }
end
theorem map_is_prime_of_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) {I : ideal R} [is_prime I] :
is_prime (map (f : R →+* S) I) :=
map_is_prime_of_surjective f.surjective $ by simp
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
@[simp] lemma mk_ker {I : ideal R} : (quotient.mk I).ker = I :=
by ext; rw [ring_hom.ker, mem_comap, submodule.mem_bot, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
lemma map_mk_eq_bot_of_le {I J : ideal R} (h : I ≤ J) : I.map (J^.quotient.mk) = ⊥ :=
by { rw [map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker, mk_ker], exact h }
lemma ker_quotient_lift {S : Type v} [comm_ring S] {I : ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (H : I ≤ f.ker) :
(ideal.quotient.lift I f H).ker = (f.ker).map I^.quotient.mk :=
begin
ext x,
split,
{ intro hx,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective x,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ← hy, ideal.quotient.lift_mk, ← ring_hom.mem_ker] at hx,
rw [← hy, mem_map_iff_of_surjective I^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective],
exact ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩ },
{ intro hx,
rw mem_map_iff_of_surjective I^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective at hx,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ← hy.right, ideal.quotient.lift_mk, ← (ring_hom.mem_ker f)],
exact hy.left },
end
theorem map_eq_iff_sup_ker_eq_of_surjective {I J : ideal R} (f : R →+* S)
(hf : function.surjective f) : map f I = map f J ↔ I ⊔ f.ker = J ⊔ f.ker :=
by rw [← (comap_injective_of_surjective f hf).eq_iff, comap_map_of_surjective f hf,
comap_map_of_surjective f hf, ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
theorem map_radical_of_surjective {f : R →+* S} (hf : function.surjective f) {I : ideal R}
(h : ring_hom.ker f ≤ I) : map f (I.radical) = (map f I).radical :=
begin
rw [radical_eq_Inf, radical_eq_Inf],
have : ∀ J ∈ {J : ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ J.is_prime}, f.ker ≤ J := λ J hJ, le_trans h hJ.left,
convert map_Inf hf this,
refine funext (λ j, propext ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintros ⟨hj, hj'⟩,
haveI : j.is_prime := hj',
exact ⟨comap f j, ⟨⟨map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hj, comap_is_prime f j⟩,
map_comap_of_surjective f hf j⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨J, ⟨hJ, hJ'⟩⟩,
haveI : J.is_prime := hJ.right,
refine ⟨hJ' ▸ map_mono hJ.left, hJ' ▸ map_is_prime_of_surjective hf (le_trans h hJ.left)⟩ },
end
@[simp] lemma bot_quotient_is_maximal_iff (I : ideal R) :
(⊥ : ideal I.quotient).is_maximal ↔ I.is_maximal :=
⟨λ hI, (@mk_ker _ _ I) ▸
@comap_is_maximal_of_surjective _ _ _ _ (quotient.mk I) quotient.mk_surjective ⊥ hI,
λ hI, @bot_is_maximal _ (@field.to_division_ring _ (@quotient.field _ _ I hI)) ⟩
section quotient_algebra
variables (R) {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [algebra R A]
/-- The `R`-algebra structure on `A/I` for an `R`-algebra `A` -/
instance {I : ideal A} : algebra R (ideal.quotient I) :=
(ring_hom.comp (ideal.quotient.mk I) (algebra_map R A)).to_algebra
/-- The canonical morphism `A →ₐ[R] I.quotient` as morphism of `R`-algebras, for `I` an ideal of
`A`, where `A` is an `R`-algebra. -/
def quotient.mkₐ (I : ideal A) : A →ₐ[R] I.quotient :=
⟨λ a, submodule.quotient.mk a, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, λ _, rfl⟩
lemma quotient.alg_map_eq (I : ideal A) :
algebra_map R I.quotient = (algebra_map A I.quotient).comp (algebra_map R A) :=
by simp only [ring_hom.algebra_map_to_algebra, ring_hom.comp_id]
instance [algebra S A] [algebra S R] [is_scalar_tower S R A]
{I : ideal A} : is_scalar_tower S R (ideal.quotient I) :=
is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq' $ by
rw [quotient.alg_map_eq R, quotient.alg_map_eq S, ring_hom.comp_assoc,
is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq S R A]
lemma quotient.mkₐ_to_ring_hom (I : ideal A) :
(quotient.mkₐ R I).to_ring_hom = ideal.quotient.mk I := rfl
@[simp] lemma quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk (I : ideal A) :
⇑(quotient.mkₐ R I) = ideal.quotient.mk I := rfl
/-- The canonical morphism `A →ₐ[R] I.quotient` is surjective. -/
lemma quotient.mkₐ_surjective (I : ideal A) : function.surjective (quotient.mkₐ R I) :=
surjective_quot_mk _
/-- The kernel of `A →ₐ[R] I.quotient` is `I`. -/
@[simp]
lemma quotient.mkₐ_ker (I : ideal A) : (quotient.mkₐ R I : A →+* I.quotient).ker = I :=
ideal.mk_ker
variables {R} {B : Type*} [comm_ring B] [algebra R B]
lemma ker_lift.map_smul (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (r : R) (x : f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient) :
f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift (r • x) = r • f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift x :=
begin
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := quotient.mkₐ_surjective R _ x,
rw [← alg_hom.map_smul, quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk, ring_hom.ker_lift_mk],
exact f.map_smul _ _
end
/-- The induced algebras morphism from the quotient by the kernel to the codomain.
This is an isomorphism if `f` has a right inverse (`quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse`) /
is surjective (`quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_surjective`).
-/
def ker_lift_alg (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient →ₐ[R] B :=
alg_hom.mk' f.to_ring_hom.ker_lift (λ _ _, ker_lift.map_smul f _ _)
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_alg_mk (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (a : A) :
ker_lift_alg f (quotient.mk f.to_ring_hom.ker a) = f a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ker_lift_alg_to_ring_hom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) :
(ker_lift_alg f).to_ring_hom = ring_hom.ker_lift f := rfl
/-- The induced algebra morphism from the quotient by the kernel is injective. -/
lemma ker_lift_alg_injective (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : function.injective (ker_lift_alg f) :=
ring_hom.ker_lift_injective f
/-- The **first isomorphism** theorem for algebras, computable version. -/
def quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse
{f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B → A} (hf : function.right_inverse g f) :
f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient ≃ₐ[R] B :=
{ ..ring_hom.quotient_ker_equiv_of_right_inverse (λ x, show f.to_ring_hom (g x) = x, from hf x),
..ker_lift_alg f}
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse.apply {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B → A}
(hf : function.right_inverse g f) (x : f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient) :
quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse hf x = ker_lift_alg f x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse_symm.apply {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B → A}
(hf : function.right_inverse g f) (x : B) :
(quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse hf).symm x = quotient.mkₐ R f.to_ring_hom.ker (g x) :=
rfl
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem** for algebras. -/
noncomputable def quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_surjective
{f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hf : function.surjective f) : f.to_ring_hom.ker.quotient ≃ₐ[R] B :=
quotient_ker_alg_equiv_of_right_inverse (classical.some_spec hf.has_right_inverse)
/-- The ring hom `R/I →+* S/J` induced by a ring hom `f : R →+* S` with `I ≤ f⁻¹(J)` -/
def quotient_map {I : ideal R} (J : ideal S) (f : R →+* S) (hIJ : I ≤ J.comap f) :
I.quotient →+* J.quotient :=
(quotient.lift I ((quotient.mk J).comp f) (λ _ ha,
by simpa [function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] using hIJ ha))
@[simp]
lemma quotient_map_mk {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
{x : R} : quotient_map I f H (quotient.mk J x) = quotient.mk I (f x) :=
quotient.lift_mk J _ _
lemma quotient_map_comp_mk {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} (H : J ≤ I.comap f) :
(quotient_map I f H).comp (quotient.mk J) = (quotient.mk I).comp f :=
ring_hom.ext (λ x, by simp only [function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, ideal.quotient_map_mk])
/-- The ring equiv `R/I ≃+* S/J` induced by a ring equiv `f : R ≃+** S`, where `J = f(I)`. -/
@[simps]
def quotient_equiv (I : ideal R) (J : ideal S) (f : R ≃+* S) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : R →+* S)) :
I.quotient ≃+* J.quotient :=
{ inv_fun := quotient_map I ↑f.symm (by {rw hIJ, exact le_of_eq (map_comap_of_equiv I f)}),
left_inv := by {rintro ⟨r⟩, simp },
right_inv := by {rintro ⟨s⟩, simp },
..quotient_map J ↑f (by {rw hIJ, exact @le_comap_map _ S _ _ _ _}) }
/-- `H` and `h` are kept as separate hypothesis since H is used in constructing the quotient map. -/
lemma quotient_map_injective' {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
(h : I.comap f ≤ J) : function.injective (quotient_map I f H) :=
begin
refine (quotient_map I f H).injective_iff.2 (λ a ha, _),
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective a,
rw [quotient_map_mk, quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] at ha,
exact (quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem).mpr (h ha),
end
/-- If we take `J = I.comap f` then `quotient_map` is injective automatically. -/
lemma quotient_map_injective {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} :
function.injective (quotient_map I f le_rfl) :=
quotient_map_injective' le_rfl
lemma quotient_map_surjective {J : ideal R} {I : ideal S} {f : R →+* S} {H : J ≤ I.comap f}
(hf : function.surjective f) : function.surjective (quotient_map I f H) :=
λ x, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective x in
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x in ⟨(quotient.mk J) y, by simp [hx, hy]⟩
/-- Commutativity of a square is preserved when taking quotients by an ideal. -/
lemma comp_quotient_map_eq_of_comp_eq {R' S' : Type*} [comm_ring R'] [comm_ring S']
{f : R →+* S} {f' : R' →+* S'} {g : R →+* R'} {g' : S →+* S'} (hfg : f'.comp g = g'.comp f)
(I : ideal S') : (quotient_map I g' le_rfl).comp (quotient_map (I.comap g') f le_rfl) =
(quotient_map I f' le_rfl).comp (quotient_map (I.comap f') g
(le_of_eq (trans (comap_comap f g') (hfg ▸ (comap_comap g f'))))) :=
begin
refine ring_hom.ext (λ a, _),
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := quotient.mk_surjective a,
simp only [ring_hom.comp_apply, quotient_map_mk],
exact congr_arg (quotient.mk I) (trans (g'.comp_apply f r).symm (hfg ▸ (f'.comp_apply g r))),
end
variables {I : ideal R} {J : ideal S} [algebra R S]
/-- The algebra hom `A/I →+* S/J` induced by an algebra hom `f : A →ₐ[R] S` with `I ≤ f⁻¹(J)`. -/
def quotient_mapₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal S) (f : A →ₐ[R] S) (hIJ : I ≤ J.comap f) :
I.quotient →ₐ[R] J.quotient :=
{ commutes' := λ r,
begin
have h : (algebra_map R I.quotient) r = (quotient.mk I) (algebra_map R A r) := rfl,
simpa [h]
end
..quotient_map J ↑f hIJ }
@[simp]
lemma quotient_map_mkₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal S) (f : A →ₐ[R] S) (H : I ≤ J.comap f)
{x : A} : quotient_mapₐ J f H (quotient.mk I x) = quotient.mkₐ R J (f x) := rfl
lemma quotient_map_comp_mkₐ {I : ideal A} (J : ideal S) (f : A →ₐ[R] S) (H : I ≤ J.comap f) :
(quotient_mapₐ J f H).comp (quotient.mkₐ R I) = (quotient.mkₐ R J).comp f :=
alg_hom.ext (λ x, by simp only [quotient_map_mkₐ, quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk, alg_hom.comp_apply])
/-- The algebra equiv `A/I ≃ₐ[R] S/J` induced by an algebra equiv `f : A ≃ₐ[R] S`,
where`J = f(I)`. -/
def quotient_equiv_alg (I : ideal A) (J : ideal S) (f : A ≃ₐ[R] S) (hIJ : J = I.map (f : A →+* S)) :
I.quotient ≃ₐ[R] J.quotient :=
{ commutes' := λ r,
begin
have h : (algebra_map R I.quotient) r = (quotient.mk I) (algebra_map R A r) := rfl,
simpa [h]
end,
..quotient_equiv I J (f : A ≃+* S) hIJ }
@[priority 100]
instance quotient_algebra : algebra (J.comap (algebra_map R S)).quotient J.quotient :=
(quotient_map J (algebra_map R S) (le_of_eq rfl)).to_algebra
lemma algebra_map_quotient_injective :
function.injective (algebra_map (J.comap (algebra_map R S)).quotient J.quotient) :=
begin
rintros ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ hab,
replace hab := quotient.eq.mp hab,
rw ← ring_hom.map_sub at hab,
exact quotient.eq.mpr hab
end
end quotient_algebra
end comm_ring
end ideal
namespace submodule
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
variables [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
-- TODO: show `[algebra R A] : algebra (ideal R) A` too
instance module_submodule : module (ideal R) (submodule R M) :=
{ smul_add := smul_sup,
add_smul := sup_smul,
mul_smul := submodule.smul_assoc,
one_smul := by simp,
zero_smul := bot_smul,
smul_zero := smul_bot }
end submodule
namespace ring_hom
variables {A B C : Type*} [ring A] [ring B] [ring C]
variables (f : A →+* B) (f_inv : B → A)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `lift_of_right_inverse` -/
def lift_of_right_inverse_aux
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
B →+* C :=
{ to_fun := λ b, g (f_inv b),
map_one' :=
begin
rw [← g.map_one, ← sub_eq_zero, ← g.map_sub, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, f.map_one],
exact hf 1
end,
map_mul' :=
begin
intros x y,
rw [← g.map_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← g.map_sub, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, f.map_mul],
simp only [hf _],
end,
.. add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse f.to_add_monoid_hom f_inv hf ⟨g.to_add_monoid_hom, hg⟩ }
@[simp] lemma lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (a : A) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux f_inv hf g hg) (f a) = g a :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply f_inv hf ⟨g.to_add_monoid_hom, hg⟩ a
/-- `lift_of_right_inverse f hf g hg` is the unique ring homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp`),
* where `f : A →+* B` is has a right_inverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : B →+* C` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `ring_hom.eq_lift_of_right_inverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
A .
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
B ----> C
∃!φ
```
-/
def lift_of_right_inverse
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker} ≃ (B →+* C) :=
{ to_fun := λ g, f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux f_inv hf g.1 g.2,
inv_fun := λ φ, ⟨φ.comp f, λ x hx, (mem_ker _).mpr $ by simp [(mem_ker _).mp hx]⟩,
left_inv := λ g, by {
ext,
simp only [comp_apply, lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply, subtype.coe_mk,
subtype.val_eq_coe], },
right_inv := λ φ, by {
ext b,
simp [lift_of_right_inverse_aux, hf b], } }
/-- A non-computable version of `ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `function.surj_inv`. -/
@[simp]
noncomputable abbreviation lift_of_surjective
(hf : function.surjective f) : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker} ≃ (B →+* C) :=
f.lift_of_right_inverse (function.surj_inv hf) (function.right_inverse_surj_inv hf)
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply
(hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker}) (x : A) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g x :=
f.lift_of_right_inverse_aux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
lemma lift_of_right_inverse_comp (hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f)
(g : {g : A →+* C // f.ker ≤ g.ker}) :
(f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
ring_hom.ext $ f.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
lemma eq_lift_of_right_inverse (hf : function.right_inverse f_inv f) (g : A →+* C)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : B →+* C) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = (f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩) :=
begin
simp_rw ←hh,
exact ((f.lift_of_right_inverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm,
end
end ring_hom
namespace double_quot
open ideal
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] (I J : ideal R)
/-- The obvious ring hom `R/I → R/(I ⊔ J)` -/
def quot_left_to_quot_sup : I.quotient →+* (I ⊔ J).quotient :=
ideal.quotient.factor I (I ⊔ J) le_sup_left
/-- The kernel of `quot_left_to_quot_sup` -/
lemma ker_quot_left_to_quot_sup :
(quot_left_to_quot_sup I J).ker = J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I) :=
by simp only [mk_ker, sup_idem, sup_comm, quot_left_to_quot_sup, quotient.factor, ker_quotient_lift,
map_eq_iff_sup_ker_eq_of_surjective I^.quotient.mk quotient.mk_surjective, ← sup_assoc]
/-- The ring homomorphism `(R/I)/J' -> R/(I ⊔ J)` induced by `quot_left_to_quot_sup` where `J'`
is the image of `J` in `R/I`-/
def quot_quot_to_quot_sup : (J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I)).quotient →+* (I ⊔ J).quotient :=
ideal.quotient.lift (ideal.map (ideal.quotient.mk I) J) (quot_left_to_quot_sup I J)
(ker_quot_left_to_quot_sup I J).symm.le
/-- The composite of the maps `R → (R/I)` and `(R/I) → (R/I)/J'` -/
def quot_quot_mk : R →+* (J.map I^.quotient.mk).quotient :=
((J.map I^.quotient.mk)^.quotient.mk).comp I^.quotient.mk
/-- The kernel of `quot_quot_mk` -/
lemma ker_quot_quot_mk : (quot_quot_mk I J).ker = I ⊔ J :=
by rw [ring_hom.ker_eq_comap_bot, quot_quot_mk, ← comap_comap, ← ring_hom.ker, mk_ker,
comap_map_of_surjective (ideal.quotient.mk I) (quotient.mk_surjective), ← ring_hom.ker, mk_ker,
sup_comm]
/-- The ring homomorphism `R/(I ⊔ J) → (R/I)/J' `induced by `quot_quot_mk` -/
def lift_sup_quot_quot_mk (I J : ideal R) : (I ⊔ J).quotient →+*
(J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I)).quotient :=
ideal.quotient.lift (I ⊔ J) (quot_quot_mk I J) (ker_quot_quot_mk I J).symm.le
/-- `quot_quot_to_quot_add` and `lift_sup_double_qot_mk` are inverse isomorphisms -/
def quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup : (J.map (ideal.quotient.mk I)).quotient ≃+* (I ⊔ J).quotient :=
ring_equiv.of_hom_inv (quot_quot_to_quot_sup I J) (lift_sup_quot_quot_mk I J)
(by { ext z, refl }) (by { ext z, refl })
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup_quot_quot_mk (x : R) :
quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup I J (quot_quot_mk I J x) = ideal.quotient.mk (I ⊔ J) x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup_symm_quot_quot_mk (x : R) :
(quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup I J).symm (ideal.quotient.mk (I ⊔ J) x) = quot_quot_mk I J x :=
rfl
/-- The obvious isomorphism `(R/I)/J' → (R/J)/I' ` -/
def quot_quot_equiv_comm : (J.map I^.quotient.mk).quotient ≃+* (I.map J^.quotient.mk).quotient :=
((quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup I J).trans (quot_equiv_of_eq sup_comm)).trans
(quot_quot_equiv_quot_sup J I).symm
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_comm_quot_quot_mk (x : R) :
quot_quot_equiv_comm I J (quot_quot_mk I J x) = quot_quot_mk J I x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_comm_comp_quot_quot_mk :
ring_hom.comp ↑(quot_quot_equiv_comm I J) (quot_quot_mk I J) = quot_quot_mk J I :=
ring_hom.ext $ quot_quot_equiv_comm_quot_quot_mk I J
@[simp]
lemma quot_quot_equiv_comm_symm :
(quot_quot_equiv_comm I J).symm = quot_quot_equiv_comm J I :=
rfl
end double_quot
|
22cf89c412ad324b13781e48f634d62860e2cf32 | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /tests/lean/tst2.lean | f35c213c93b9740c1f61ef767e83f4d03c657f97 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 202 | lean | print options
variable a : Bool
variable b : Bool
print a/\b
set_option lean::pp::notation false
print options
print a/\b
print environment 2
set_option lean::pp::notation true
print options
print a/\b
|
d352e80d6c7a7b727e0a50faea9b95f9e68729e5 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/match1.lean | 1251ba682db3f4ac713a4f179fd5a3e506094f33 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,788 | lean | import Lean
def checkWithMkMatcherInput (matcher : Lean.Name) : Lean.MetaM Unit :=
Lean.Meta.Match.withMkMatcherInput matcher fun input => do
let res ← Lean.Meta.Match.mkMatcher input
let origMatcher ← Lean.getConstInfo matcher
if not <| input.matcherName == matcher then
throwError "matcher name not reconstructed correctly: {matcher} ≟ {input.matcherName}"
let lCtx ← Lean.getLCtx
let fvars := Lean.collectFVars {} res.matcher
let closure := Lean.Meta.Closure.mkLambda (fvars.fvarSet.toList.toArray.map lCtx.get!) res.matcher
let origTy := origMatcher.value!
let newTy := closure
if not <| ←Lean.Meta.isDefEq origTy newTy then
throwError "matcher {matcher} does not round-trip correctly:\n{origTy} ≟ {newTy}"
set_option smartUnfolding false
def f (xs : List Nat) : List Bool :=
xs.map fun
| 0 => true
| _ => false
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``f.match_1
#eval f [1, 2, 0, 2]
theorem ex1 : f [1, 0, 2] = [false, true, false] :=
rfl
#check f
set_option pp.raw true
set_option pp.raw.maxDepth 10
set_option trace.Elab.step true in
def g (xs : List Nat) : List Bool :=
xs.map <| by {
intro
| 0 => exact true
| _ => exact false
}
theorem ex2 : g [1, 0, 2] = [false, true, false] :=
rfl
theorem ex3 {p q r : Prop} : p ∨ q → r → (q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
by intro
| Or.inl hp, h => { apply Or.inr; apply And.intro; assumption; assumption }
| Or.inr hq, h => { apply Or.inl; exact ⟨hq, h⟩ }
inductive C
| mk₁ : Nat → C
| mk₂ : Nat → Nat → C
def C.x : C → Nat
| C.mk₁ x => x
| C.mk₂ x _ => x
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``C.x.match_1
def head : {α : Type} → List α → Option α
| _, a::as => some a
| _, _ => none
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``head.match_1
theorem ex4 : head [1, 2] = some 1 :=
rfl
def head2 : {α : Type} → List α → Option α :=
@fun
| _, a::as => some a
| _, _ => none
theorem ex5 : head2 [1, 2] = some 1 :=
rfl
def head3 {α : Type} (xs : List α) : Option α :=
let rec aux {α : Type} : List α → Option α
| a::_ => some a
| _ => none;
aux xs
theorem ex6 : head3 [1, 2] = some 1 :=
rfl
inductive Vec.{u} (α : Type u) : Nat → Type u
| nil : Vec α 0
| cons {n} (head : α) (tail : Vec α n) : Vec α (n+1)
def Vec.mapHead1 {α β δ} : {n : Nat} → Vec α n → Vec β n → (α → β → δ) → Option δ
| _, nil, nil, f => none
| _, cons a as, cons b bs, f => some (f a b)
def Vec.mapHead2 {α β δ} : {n : Nat} → Vec α n → Vec β n → (α → β → δ) → Option δ
| _, nil, nil, f => none
| _, @cons _ n a as, cons b bs, f => some (f a b)
set_option pp.match false in
#print Vec.mapHead2 -- reused Vec.mapHead1.match_1
def Vec.mapHead3 {α β δ} : {n : Nat} → Vec α n → Vec β n → (α → β → δ) → Option δ
| _, nil, nil, f => none
| _, cons (tail := as) (head := a), cons b bs, f => some (f a b)
inductive Foo
| mk₁ (x y z w : Nat)
| mk₂ (x y z w : Nat)
def Foo.z : Foo → Nat
| mk₁ (z := z) .. => z
| mk₂ (z := z) .. => z
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``Foo.z.match_1
#eval (Foo.mk₁ 10 20 30 40).z
theorem ex7 : (Foo.mk₁ 10 20 30 40).z = 30 :=
rfl
def Foo.addY? : Foo × Foo → Option Nat
| (mk₁ (y := y₁) .., mk₁ (y := y₂) ..) => some (y₁ + y₂)
| _ => none
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``Foo.addY?.match_1
#eval Foo.addY? (Foo.mk₁ 1 2 3 4, Foo.mk₁ 10 20 30 40)
theorem ex8 : Foo.addY? (Foo.mk₁ 1 2 3 4, Foo.mk₁ 10 20 30 40) = some 22 :=
rfl
instance {α} : Inhabited (Sigma fun m => Vec α m) :=
⟨⟨0, Vec.nil⟩⟩
partial def filter {α} (p : α → Bool) : {n : Nat} → Vec α n → Sigma fun m => Vec α m
| _, Vec.nil => ⟨0, Vec.nil⟩
| _, Vec.cons x xs => match p x, filter p xs with
| true, ⟨_, ys⟩ => ⟨_, Vec.cons x ys⟩
| false, ys => ys
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``filter.match_1
inductive Bla
| ofNat (x : Nat)
| ofBool (x : Bool)
def Bla.optional? : Bla → Option Nat
| ofNat x => some x
| ofBool _ => none
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``Bla.optional?.match_1
def Bla.isNat? (b : Bla) : Option { x : Nat // optional? b = some x } :=
match b.optional? with
| some y => some ⟨y, rfl⟩
| none => none
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``Bla.isNat?.match_1
def foo (b : Bla) : Option Nat := b.optional?
theorem fooEq (b : Bla) : foo b = b.optional? :=
rfl
def Bla.isNat2? (b : Bla) : Option { x : Nat // optional? b = some x } :=
match h : foo b with
| some y => some ⟨y, Eq.trans (fooEq b).symm h⟩
| none => none
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``Bla.isNat2?.match_1
def foo2 (x : Nat) : Nat :=
match (motive := (y : Nat) → x = y → Nat) x, rfl with
| 0, h => 0
| x+1, h => 1
#eval checkWithMkMatcherInput ``foo2.match_1
|
969bdfe5ced5706301319ff8c4380c8d9bb61101 | e151e9053bfd6d71740066474fc500a087837323 | /src/hott/types/2_adj/prelim.lean | 10373982f7424310d89513c6af0b0d5217836e3d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | daniel-carranza/hott3 | 15bac2d90589dbb952ef15e74b2837722491963d | 913811e8a1371d3a5751d7d32ff9dec8aa6815d9 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,091,349,670 | 1,596,222,336,000 | 1,596,222,336,000 | 241,957,822 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,582,222,839,000 | 1,582,222,838,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,485 | lean | /-
Authors: Daniel Carranza, Jonathon Chang, Ryan Sandford
Under the supervision of Chris Kapulkin
Some auxiliary lemmas used in adj.lean and two_adj.lean
Last updated: 2020-07-31
-/
import hott.init hott.types.equiv
universes u v
hott_theory
namespace hott
open hott
namespace pi
variable {A : Type u}
variable {B : Type v}
variable {C : Type _}
@[hott] def precompose (f : A → B) : (B → C) → (A → C) :=
λg, g ∘ f
@[hott] def precompose_equiv_is_equiv (f : A → B) [H: is_equiv f]
: is_equiv (@precompose A B C f) :=
is_equiv.adjointify (precompose f)
(λg: A → C, g ∘ f⁻¹ᶠ)
(λg, eq_of_homotopy (λx, ap g (is_equiv.left_inv f x) ))
(λg, eq_of_homotopy (λx, ap g (is_equiv.right_inv f x)))
@[hott] def precompose_equiv (f : A → B) [H : is_equiv f]
: (B → C) ≃ (A → C) :=
equiv.mk (precompose f) (precompose_equiv_is_equiv f)
@[hott] def postcompose (f : B → C) : (A → B) → (A → C) :=
λg, f ∘ g
@[hott] def postcompose_equiv_is_equiv (f : B → C) [H : is_equiv f]
: is_equiv (@postcompose A B C f) :=
is_equiv.adjointify (postcompose f)
(λg : A → C, f⁻¹ᶠ ∘ g)
(λg, eq_of_homotopy (λx, is_equiv.right_inv f _))
(λg, eq_of_homotopy (λx, is_equiv.left_inv f _))
@[hott] def postcompose_equiv (f : B → C) [H : is_equiv f]
: (A → B) ≃ (A → C) :=
equiv.mk (postcompose f) (postcompose_equiv_is_equiv f)
end pi
namespace eq
@[hott] def inv_inv_htpy {A : Type u} {P : A → Type _} {f g : Π(x : A), P x}
(H : f ~ g) : (H⁻¹ʰᵗʸ)⁻¹ʰᵗʸ = H :=
eq_of_homotopy (λx, inv_inv (H x))
end eq
namespace is_trunc
variable {A : Type u}
variable {B : A → Type _}
@[hott, instance] def sigma_hty_is_contr (f : Π(x : A), B x) : is_contr (Σ(g : Π(x : A), B x), f ~ g) :=
is_trunc.is_contr.mk ⟨f, λx, rfl⟩ (λu, by induction u;
apply eq.homotopy.rec_idp (λg H, @hott.eq (Σ(g : Π(x : A), B x), f ~ g) ⟨f, λx, rfl⟩ ⟨g, H⟩) rfl u_snd)
@[hott, instance] def sigma_hty_is_contr_right (f : Π(x : A), B x) : is_contr (Σ(g : Π(x : A), B x), g ~ f) :=
@is_trunc.is_trunc_equiv_closed (Σ(g : Π(x : A), B x), f ~ g) (Σ(g : Π(x : A), B x), g ~ f) -2
(sigma.sigma_equiv_sigma_right (λg, pi.pi_equiv_pi_right (λx, eq_equiv_eq_symm (f x) (g x))))
(sigma_hty_is_contr f)
end is_trunc
end hott |
0470ad7da7d48a80bd1ee8b3a73c6434b60d8237 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/group_theory/group_action/default.lean | f48046112e6c502d5525226f659ff010b79e5de7 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 151 | lean | import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.group_theory.group_action.basic
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.