blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2c2cb87c22c01367f6f2d95a1a30bc35673e961b | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/WFRelSearch.lean | 11bea88a1de33874aead64b8f13da8ee6ddaaddd | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 390 | lean | mutual
def f (n : Nat) (α₁ α₂ α₃ α₄ α₅ α₆ α₇ α₈ : Type) (m : Nat) : Type :=
match m with
| 0 => α₁
| m+1 => g n α₂ α₃ α₄ α₅ α₆ α₇ α₈ α₁ m
def g (n : Nat) (α₁ α₂ α₃ α₄ α₅ α₆ α₇ α₈ : Type) (m : Nat) : Type :=
match m with
| 0 => α₁
| m+1 => f n α₂ α₃ α₄ α₅ α₆ α₇ α₈ α₁ m
end
|
0cb4600af5cd160e9c520b25dd81e775bcb91cbc | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/category_theory/category/default.lean | 8aab83868edeb8c2ee520ea97b996ee1495cdd85 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,187 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Reid Barton
-/
import combinatorics.quiver
import tactic.basic
/-!
# Categories
Defines a category, as a type class parametrised by the type of objects.
## Notations
Introduces notations
* `X ⟶ Y` for the morphism spaces,
* `f ≫ g` for composition in the 'arrows' convention.
Users may like to add `f ⊚ g` for composition in the standard convention, using
```lean
local notation f ` ⊚ `:80 g:80 := category.comp g f -- type as \oo
```
-/
/--
The typeclass `category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C : Type u`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are independent, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `category.{v} C`.
Typically any concrete example will either be a `small_category`, where `v = u`,
which can be introduced as
```
universes u
variables {C : Type u} [small_category C]
```
or a `large_category`, where `u = v+1`, which can be introduced as
```
universes u
variables {C : Type (u+1)} [large_category C]
```
In order for the library to handle these cases uniformly,
we generally work with the unconstrained `category.{v u}`,
for which objects live in `Type u` and morphisms live in `Type v`.
Because the universe parameter `u` for the objects can be inferred from `C`
when we write `category C`, while the universe parameter `v` for the morphisms
can not be automatically inferred, through the category theory library
we introduce universe parameters with morphism levels listed first,
as in
```
universes v u
```
or
```
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
```
when multiple independent universes are needed.
This has the effect that we can simply write `category.{v} C`
(that is, only specifying a single parameter) while `u` will be inferred.
Often, however, it's not even necessary to include the `.{v}`.
(Although it was in earlier versions of Lean.)
If it is omitted a "free" universe will be used.
-/
library_note "category_theory universes"
universes v u
namespace category_theory
/-- A preliminary structure on the way to defining a category,
containing the data, but none of the axioms. -/
class category_struct (obj : Type u)
extends quiver.{v+1} obj : Type (max u (v+1)) :=
(id : Π X : obj, hom X X)
(comp : Π {X Y Z : obj}, (X ⟶ Y) → (Y ⟶ Z) → (X ⟶ Z))
notation `𝟙` := category_struct.id -- type as \b1
infixr ` ≫ `:80 := category_struct.comp -- type as \gg
/--
The typeclass `category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are unconstrained, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `category.{v} C`. (See also `large_category` and `small_category`.)
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0014.
-/
class category (obj : Type u)
extends category_struct.{v} obj : Type (max u (v+1)) :=
(id_comp' : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : hom X Y), 𝟙 X ≫ f = f . obviously)
(comp_id' : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : hom X Y), f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f . obviously)
(assoc' : ∀ {W X Y Z : obj} (f : hom W X) (g : hom X Y) (h : hom Y Z),
(f ≫ g) ≫ h = f ≫ (g ≫ h) . obviously)
-- `restate_axiom` is a command that creates a lemma from a structure field,
-- discarding any auto_param wrappers from the type.
-- (It removes a backtick from the name, if it finds one, and otherwise adds "_lemma".)
restate_axiom category.id_comp'
restate_axiom category.comp_id'
restate_axiom category.assoc'
attribute [simp] category.id_comp category.comp_id category.assoc
attribute [trans] category_struct.comp
/--
A `large_category` has objects in one universe level higher than the universe level of
the morphisms. It is useful for examples such as the category of types, or the category
of groups, etc.
-/
abbreviation large_category (C : Type (u+1)) : Type (u+1) := category.{u} C
/--
A `small_category` has objects and morphisms in the same universe level.
-/
abbreviation small_category (C : Type u) : Type (u+1) := category.{u} C
section
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
/-- postcompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
lemma eq_whisker {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : f = g) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ≫ h = g ≫ h :=
by rw w
/-- precompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
lemma whisker_eq (f : X ⟶ Y) {g h : Y ⟶ Z} (w : g = h) : f ≫ g = f ≫ h :=
by rw w
infixr ` =≫ `:80 := eq_whisker
infixr ` ≫= `:80 := whisker_eq
lemma eq_of_comp_left_eq {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z), f ≫ h = g ≫ h) : f = g :=
by { convert w (𝟙 Y), tidy }
lemma eq_of_comp_right_eq {f g : Y ⟶ Z} (w : ∀ {X : C} (h : X ⟶ Y), h ≫ f = h ≫ g) : f = g :=
by { convert w (𝟙 Y), tidy }
lemma eq_of_comp_left_eq' (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : (λ {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z), f ≫ h) = (λ {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z), g ≫ h)) : f = g :=
eq_of_comp_left_eq (λ Z h, by convert congr_fun (congr_fun w Z) h)
lemma eq_of_comp_right_eq' (f g : Y ⟶ Z)
(w : (λ {X : C} (h : X ⟶ Y), h ≫ f) = (λ {X : C} (h : X ⟶ Y), h ≫ g)) : f = g :=
eq_of_comp_right_eq (λ X h, by convert congr_fun (congr_fun w X) h)
lemma id_of_comp_left_id (f : X ⟶ X) (w : ∀ {Y : C} (g : X ⟶ Y), f ≫ g = g) : f = 𝟙 X :=
by { convert w (𝟙 X), tidy }
lemma id_of_comp_right_id (f : X ⟶ X) (w : ∀ {Y : C} (g : Y ⟶ X), g ≫ f = g) : f = 𝟙 X :=
by { convert w (𝟙 X), tidy }
lemma comp_dite {P : Prop} [decidable P]
{X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
(f ≫ if h : P then g h else g' h) = (if h : P then f ≫ g h else f ≫ g' h) :=
by { split_ifs; refl }
lemma dite_comp {P : Prop} [decidable P]
{X Y Z : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ≫ g = (if h : P then f h ≫ g else f' h ≫ g) :=
by { split_ifs; refl }
/--
A morphism `f` is an epimorphism if it can be "cancelled" when precomposed:
`f ≫ g = f ≫ h` implies `g = h`.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/003B.
-/
class epi (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
(left_cancellation : Π {Z : C} (g h : Y ⟶ Z) (w : f ≫ g = f ≫ h), g = h)
/--
A morphism `f` is a monomorphism if it can be "cancelled" when postcomposed:
`g ≫ f = h ≫ f` implies `g = h`.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/003B.
-/
class mono (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
(right_cancellation : Π {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ X) (w : g ≫ f = h ≫ f), g = h)
instance (X : C) : epi (𝟙 X) :=
⟨λ Z g h w, by simpa using w⟩
instance (X : C) : mono (𝟙 X) :=
⟨λ Z g h w, by simpa using w⟩
lemma cancel_epi (f : X ⟶ Y) [epi f] {g h : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g = f ≫ h) ↔ g = h :=
⟨ λ p, epi.left_cancellation g h p, begin intro a, subst a end ⟩
lemma cancel_mono (f : X ⟶ Y) [mono f] {g h : Z ⟶ X} : (g ≫ f = h ≫ f) ↔ g = h :=
⟨ λ p, mono.right_cancellation g h p, begin intro a, subst a end ⟩
lemma cancel_epi_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [epi f] {h : Y ⟶ Y} : (f ≫ h = f) ↔ h = 𝟙 Y :=
by { convert cancel_epi f, simp, }
lemma cancel_mono_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [mono f] {g : X ⟶ X} : (g ≫ f = f) ↔ g = 𝟙 X :=
by { convert cancel_mono f, simp, }
lemma epi_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [epi f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [epi g] : epi (f ≫ g) :=
begin
split, intros Z a b w,
apply (cancel_epi g).1,
apply (cancel_epi f).1,
simpa using w,
end
lemma mono_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [mono f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [mono g] : mono (f ≫ g) :=
begin
split, intros Z a b w,
apply (cancel_mono f).1,
apply (cancel_mono g).1,
simpa using w,
end
lemma mono_of_mono {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [mono (f ≫ g)] : mono f :=
begin
split, intros Z a b w,
replace w := congr_arg (λ k, k ≫ g) w,
dsimp at w,
rw [category.assoc, category.assoc] at w,
exact (cancel_mono _).1 w,
end
lemma mono_of_mono_fac {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : X ⟶ Z} [mono h] (w : f ≫ g = h) :
mono f :=
by { substI h, exact mono_of_mono f g, }
lemma epi_of_epi {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [epi (f ≫ g)] : epi g :=
begin
split, intros Z a b w,
replace w := congr_arg (λ k, f ≫ k) w,
dsimp at w,
rw [←category.assoc, ←category.assoc] at w,
exact (cancel_epi _).1 w,
end
lemma epi_of_epi_fac {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : X ⟶ Z} [epi h] (w : f ≫ g = h) :
epi g :=
by substI h; exact epi_of_epi f g
end
section
variable (C : Type u)
variable [category.{v} C]
universe u'
instance ulift_category : category.{v} (ulift.{u'} C) :=
{ hom := λ X Y, (X.down ⟶ Y.down),
id := λ X, 𝟙 X.down,
comp := λ _ _ _ f g, f ≫ g }
-- We verify that this previous instance can lift small categories to large categories.
example (D : Type u) [small_category D] : large_category (ulift.{u+1} D) := by apply_instance
end
end category_theory
open category_theory
/-!
We now put a category instance on any preorder.
Because we do not allow the morphisms of a category to live in `Prop`,
unfortunately we need to use `plift` and `ulift` when defining the morphisms.
As convenience functions, we provide `hom_of_le` and `le_of_hom` to wrap and unwrap inequalities.
-/
namespace preorder
variables (α : Type u)
/--
The category structure coming from a preorder. There is a morphism `X ⟶ Y` if and only if `X ≤ Y`.
Because we don't allow morphisms to live in `Prop`,
we have to define `X ⟶ Y` as `ulift (plift (X ≤ Y))`.
See `category_theory.hom_of_le` and `category_theory.le_of_hom`.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00D3.
-/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance small_category [preorder α] : small_category α :=
{ hom := λ U V, ulift (plift (U ≤ V)),
id := λ X, ⟨ ⟨ le_refl X ⟩ ⟩,
comp := λ X Y Z f g, ⟨ ⟨ le_trans _ _ _ f.down.down g.down.down ⟩ ⟩ }
end preorder
namespace category_theory
variables {α : Type u} [preorder α]
/--
Express an inequality as a morphism in the corresponding preorder category.
-/
def hom_of_le {U V : α} (h : U ≤ V) : U ⟶ V := ulift.up (plift.up h)
@[simp] lemma hom_of_le_refl {U : α} : hom_of_le (le_refl U) = 𝟙 U := rfl
@[simp] lemma hom_of_le_comp {U V W : α} (h : U ≤ V) (k : V ≤ W) :
hom_of_le h ≫ hom_of_le k = hom_of_le (h.trans k) := rfl
/--
Extract the underlying inequality from a morphism in a preorder category.
-/
lemma le_of_hom {U V : α} (h : U ⟶ V) : U ≤ V := h.down.down
@[simp] lemma le_of_hom_hom_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
le_of_hom (hom_of_le h) = h := rfl
@[simp] lemma hom_of_le_le_of_hom {a b : α} (h : a ⟶ b) :
hom_of_le (le_of_hom h) = h :=
by { cases h, cases h, refl, }
end category_theory
/--
Many proofs in the category theory library use the `dsimp, simp` pattern,
which typically isn't necessary elsewhere.
One would usually hope that the same effect could be achieved simply with `simp`.
The essential issue is that composition of morphisms involves dependent types.
When you have a chain of morphisms being composed, say `f : X ⟶ Y` and `g : Y ⟶ Z`,
then `simp` can operate succesfully on the morphisms
(e.g. if `f` is the identity it can strip that off).
However if we have an equality of objects, say `Y = Y'`,
then `simp` can't operate because it would break the typing of the composition operations.
We rarely have interesting equalities of objects
(because that would be "evil" --- anything interesting should be expressed as an isomorphism
and tracked explicitly),
except of course that we have plenty of definitional equalities of objects.
`dsimp` can apply these safely, even inside a composition.
After `dsimp` has cleared up the object level, `simp` can resume work on the morphism level ---
but without the `dsimp` step, because `simp` looks at expressions syntactically,
the relevant lemmas might not fire.
There's no bound on how many times you potentially could have to switch back and forth,
if the `simp` introduced new objects we again need to `dsimp`.
In practice this does occur, but only rarely, because `simp` tends to shorten chains of compositions
(i.e. not introduce new objects at all).
-/
library_note "dsimp, simp"
|
52119d39252531ed5f6ab01261610816f4aaacff | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/group_theory/perm/subgroup.lean | 4296932e6699b1c9c38687aad92fbfc9da39ea05 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,159 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import group_theory.perm.basic
import data.fintype.basic
import group_theory.subgroup.basic
/-!
# Lemmas about subgroups within the permutations (self-equivalences) of a type `α`
This file provides extra lemmas about some `subgroup`s that exist within `equiv.perm α`.
`group_theory.subgroup` depends on `group_theory.perm.basic`, so these need to be in a separate
file.
It also provides decidable instances on membership in these subgroups, since
`monoid_hom.decidable_mem_range` cannot be inferred without the help of a lambda.
The presence of these instances induces a `fintype` instance on the `quotient_group.quotient` of
these subgroups.
-/
namespace equiv
namespace perm
universes u
instance sum_congr_hom.decidable_mem_range {α β : Type*}
[decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] [fintype α] [fintype β] :
decidable_pred (∈ (sum_congr_hom α β).range) :=
λ x, infer_instance
@[simp]
lemma sum_congr_hom.card_range {α β : Type*}
[fintype (sum_congr_hom α β).range] [fintype (perm α × perm β)] :
fintype.card (sum_congr_hom α β).range = fintype.card (perm α × perm β) :=
fintype.card_eq.mpr ⟨(of_injective (sum_congr_hom α β) sum_congr_hom_injective).symm⟩
instance sigma_congr_right_hom.decidable_mem_range {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
[decidable_eq α] [∀ a, decidable_eq (β a)] [fintype α] [∀ a, fintype (β a)] :
decidable_pred (∈ (sigma_congr_right_hom β).range) :=
λ x, infer_instance
@[simp]
lemma sigma_congr_right_hom.card_range {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
[fintype (sigma_congr_right_hom β).range] [fintype (Π a, perm (β a))] :
fintype.card (sigma_congr_right_hom β).range = fintype.card (Π a, perm (β a)) :=
fintype.card_eq.mpr ⟨(of_injective (sigma_congr_right_hom β) sigma_congr_right_hom_injective).symm⟩
instance subtype_congr_hom.decidable_mem_range {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
[fintype (perm {a // p a} × perm {a // ¬ p a})] [decidable_eq (perm α)] :
decidable_pred (∈ (subtype_congr_hom p).range) :=
λ x, infer_instance
@[simp]
lemma subtype_congr_hom.card_range {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
[fintype (subtype_congr_hom p).range] [fintype (perm {a // p a} × perm {a // ¬ p a})] :
fintype.card (subtype_congr_hom p).range = fintype.card (perm {a // p a} × perm {a // ¬ p a}) :=
fintype.card_eq.mpr ⟨(of_injective (subtype_congr_hom p) (subtype_congr_hom_injective p)).symm⟩
/-- **Cayley's theorem**: Every group G is isomorphic to a subgroup of the symmetric group acting on
`G`. Note that we generalize this to an arbitrary "faithful" group action by `G`. Setting `H = G`
recovers the usual statement of Cayley's theorem via `right_cancel_monoid.to_has_faithful_smul` -/
noncomputable def subgroup_of_mul_action (G H : Type*) [group G] [mul_action G H]
[has_faithful_smul G H] : G ≃* (mul_action.to_perm_hom G H).range :=
mul_equiv.of_left_inverse' _ (classical.some_spec mul_action.to_perm_injective.has_left_inverse)
end perm
end equiv
|
ce864c66b034143ff63b1c219ed7ce5d06225b4b | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/openInScopeBug.lean | 901068fdef5a8bb690dca8d20095cae70efaadf0 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 929 | lean | opaque f : Nat → Nat
opaque g : Nat → Nat
namespace Foo
@[scoped simp] axiom ax1 (x : Nat) : f (g x) = x
@[scoped simp] axiom ax2 (x : Nat) : g (g x) = g x
end Foo
theorem ex1 : f (g (g (g x))) = x := by
fail_if_success simp -- does not use ax1 and ax2
simp [Foo.ax1, Foo.ax2]
theorem ex2 : f (g (g (g x))) = x :=
have h₁ : f (g (g (g x))) = f (g x) := by
fail_if_success simp
/- try again with `Foo` scoped lemmas -/
open Foo in simp
have h₂ : f (g x) = x := by
fail_if_success simp
open Foo in simp
Eq.trans h₁ h₂
-- open Foo in simp -- works
theorem ex3 : f (g (g (g x))) = x := by
fail_if_success simp
simp [Foo.ax1, Foo.ax2]
open Foo in
theorem ex4 : f (g (g (g x))) = x := by
simp
theorem ex5 : f (g (g (g x))) = x ∧ f (g x) = x := by
apply And.intro
{ fail_if_success simp
open Foo in simp }
{ fail_if_success simp
open Foo in simp }
|
7e0eef99008627655c510cd82d398edb291632a9 | e4a7c8ab8b68ca0e53d2c21397320ea590fa01c6 | /src/data/polya/default.lean | bb67d8335ec1f4d372665551e6fa01d1fe48a4ba | [] | no_license | lean-forward/field | 3ff5dc5f43de40f35481b375f8c871cd0a07c766 | 7e2127ad485aec25e58a1b9c82a6bb74a599467a | refs/heads/master | 1,590,947,010,909 | 1,563,811,881,000 | 1,563,811,881,000 | 190,415,651 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,563,643,371,000 | 1,559,746,688,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13 | lean | import .field |
29b4ade31162d4fda2ff2d79afd35afec75bb463 | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /archive/imo/imo1962_q4.lean | 6754c025f6a9bce066a183efa4d02ee38ff67716 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,372 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Lacker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Lacker
-/
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric
/-!
# IMO 1962 Q4
Solve the equation `cos x ^ 2 + cos (2 * x) ^ 2 + cos (3 * x) ^ 2 = 1`.
Since Lean does not have a concept of "simplest form", we just express what is
in fact the simplest form of the set of solutions, and then prove it equals the set of solutions.
-/
open real
open_locale real
noncomputable theory
def problem_equation (x : ℝ) : Prop := cos x ^ 2 + cos (2 * x) ^ 2 + cos (3 * x) ^ 2 = 1
def solution_set : set ℝ :=
{ x : ℝ | ∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * ↑k + 1) * π / 4 ∨ x = (2 * ↑k + 1) * π / 6 }
/-
The key to solving this problem simply is that we can rewrite the equation as
a product of terms, shown in `alt_formula`, being equal to zero.
-/
def alt_formula (x : ℝ) : ℝ := cos x * (cos x ^ 2 - 1/2) * cos (3 * x)
lemma cos_sum_equiv {x : ℝ} :
(cos x ^ 2 + cos (2 * x) ^ 2 + cos (3 * x) ^ 2 - 1) / 4 = alt_formula x :=
begin
simp only [real.cos_two_mul, cos_three_mul, alt_formula],
ring
end
lemma alt_equiv {x : ℝ} : problem_equation x ↔ alt_formula x = 0 :=
begin
rw [ problem_equation, ← cos_sum_equiv, div_eq_zero_iff, sub_eq_zero],
norm_num,
end
lemma finding_zeros {x : ℝ} :
alt_formula x = 0 ↔ cos x ^ 2 = 1/2 ∨ cos (3 * x) = 0 :=
begin
simp only [alt_formula, mul_assoc, mul_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero],
split,
{ rintro (h1|h2),
{ right,
rw [cos_three_mul, h1],
ring },
{ exact h2 } },
{ exact or.inr }
end
/-
Now we can solve for `x` using basic-ish trigonometry.
-/
lemma solve_cos2_half {x : ℝ} : cos x ^ 2 = 1/2 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * ↑k + 1) * π / 4 :=
begin
rw cos_square,
simp only [add_right_eq_self, div_eq_zero_iff],
norm_num,
rw cos_eq_zero_iff,
split;
{ rintro ⟨k, h⟩,
use k,
linarith },
end
lemma solve_cos3x_0 {x : ℝ} : cos (3 * x) = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * ↑k + 1) * π / 6 :=
begin
rw cos_eq_zero_iff,
apply exists_congr,
intro k,
split; intro; linarith
end
/-
The final theorem is now just gluing together our lemmas.
-/
theorem imo1962_q4 {x : ℝ} : problem_equation x ↔ x ∈ solution_set :=
begin
rw [alt_equiv, finding_zeros, solve_cos3x_0, solve_cos2_half],
exact exists_or_distrib.symm
end
|
d22875a9e37aa1fbea442f78b1ceb752e8f53fb4 | 1fbca480c1574e809ae95a3eda58188ff42a5e41 | /src/util/data/foldable.lean | 97932c8687e4658dad9468985513ae3d17d02430 | [] | no_license | unitb/lean-lib | 560eea0acf02b1fd4bcaac9986d3d7f1a4290e7e | 439b80e606b4ebe4909a08b1d77f4f5c0ee3dee9 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,706,025,400 | 1,570,144,245,000 | 1,570,144,245,000 | 99,579,229 | 5 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,517 | lean |
import data.lazy_list
universes u v w
namespace lazy_list
variables {α : Type u}
variables {r : Type v}
open nat
def length : lazy_list α → ℕ
| nil := 0
| (cons x xs) := succ $ length (xs ())
@[simp] def nth_le : Π (l : lazy_list α) (n), n < l.length → α
| nil n h := absurd h (not_lt_zero n)
| (cons a l) 0 h := a
| (cons a l) (n+1) h := nth_le (l ()) n (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
def foldr (f : α → r → r) : lazy_list α → r → r
| nil r := r
| (cons x xs) r := f x (foldr (xs ()) r)
def foldl (f : α → r → r) : lazy_list α → r → r
| nil r := r
| (cons x xs) r := foldl (xs ()) (f x r)
end lazy_list
class foldable (f : Type u → Type v) extends functor f :=
(size : ∀ {α}, f α → ℕ)
(fold : ∀ {α} (x : f α), fin (size x) → α)
(idx : ∀ {α} (x : f α), f (ulift $ fin (size x)))
(correct_fold : ∀ {α} (x : f α), map (λ i, (fold x) (ulift.down i)) (idx x) = x)
(to_lazy_list : ∀ {α}, f α → lazy_list α)
(size_eq_length : ∀ {α} (x : f α), size x = (to_lazy_list x).length)
(to_lazy_list_eq_fold : ∀ {α} (x : f α) i
(h : i < (to_lazy_list x).length),
fold x ⟨i,eq.mp (by rw size_eq_length) h⟩ = (to_lazy_list x).nth_le i h)
export foldable (size fold idx correct_fold to_lazy_list)
namespace foldable
def foldr' {f : Type u → Type v} [i : foldable f] {r : Type w} {α : Type u} (g : α → r → r)
: f α → r → r :=
lazy_list.foldr g ∘ to_lazy_list
def foldr {f : Type u → Type v} [i : foldable f] {r : Type w} {α : Type u} (g : α → r → r)
: r → f α → r :=
flip (foldr' g)
def foldl {f : Type u → Type v} [i : foldable f] {r : Type w} {α : Type u} (g : α → r → r)
: f α → r → r :=
lazy_list.foldl g ∘ to_lazy_list
def to_list {f : Type u → Type v} [i : foldable f] {α : Type u} : f α → list α :=
@foldr f i _ _ list.cons []
def to_set' {f : Type u → Type v} [i : foldable f] {α : Type u} {r : Type u}
[has_insert α r]
[has_emptyc r]
: f α → r :=
@foldr f i _ _ insert ∅
def to_set {f : Type u → Type v} [i : foldable f] {α : Type u}
: f α → set α :=
@to_set' f i _ _ _ _
def fold_map {f : Type u → Type v} [i : foldable f] {m : Type w} [monoid m] {α : Type u}
(g : α → m)
: f α → m :=
@foldr f i _ _ (has_mul.mul ∘ g) 1
def fold_map_add {f : Type u → Type v} [i : foldable f] {m : Type w} [add_monoid m] {α : Type u}
(g : α → m)
: f α → m :=
@foldr f i _ _ (has_add.add ∘ g) 0
end foldable
|
16194053e1996c5b6d52a2aab951211c83f1dbf4 | b00eb947a9c4141624aa8919e94ce6dcd249ed70 | /tests/lean/run/inductive_pred.lean | e26857252512d4aaec109ead2e66f4e3a92b14f6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/lean4-old | a4129a041af2d4d12afb3a8d4deedabde727719b | ee51cdfaf63ee313c914d83264f91f414a0e3b6e | refs/heads/master | 1,683,628,606,745 | 1,622,651,300,000 | 1,622,654,405,000 | 142,608,821 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,006 | lean | import Lean
open Lean
def checkGetBelowIndices (ctorName : Name) (indices : Array Nat) : MetaM Unit := do
let actualIndices ← Meta.IndPredBelow.getBelowIndices ctorName
if actualIndices != indices then
throwError "wrong indices for {ctorName}: {actualIndices} ≟ {indices}"
namespace Ex
inductive LE : Nat → Nat → Prop
| refl : LE n n
| succ : LE n m → LE n m.succ
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``LE.refl #[1]
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``LE.succ #[1, 2, 3]
def typeOf {α : Sort u} (a : α) := α
theorem LE_brecOn : typeOf @LE.brecOn =
∀ {motive : (a a_1 : Nat) → LE a a_1 → Prop} {a a_1 : Nat} (x : LE a a_1),
(∀ (a a_2 : Nat) (x : LE a a_2), @LE.below motive a a_2 x → motive a a_2 x) → motive a a_1 x := rfl
theorem LE.trans : LE m n → LE n o → LE m o := by
intro h1 h2
induction h2 with
| refl => assumption
| succ h2 ih => exact succ (ih h1)
theorem LE.trans' : LE m n → LE n o → LE m o
| h1, refl => h1
| h1, succ h2 => succ (trans' h1 h2) -- the structural recursion in being performed on the implicit `Nat` parameter
inductive Even : Nat → Prop
| zero : Even 0
| ss : Even n → Even n.succ.succ
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``Even.zero #[]
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``Even.ss #[1, 2]
theorem Even_brecOn : typeOf @Even.brecOn = ∀ {motive : (a : Nat) → Even a → Prop} {a : Nat} (x : Even a),
(∀ (a : Nat) (x : Even a), @Even.below motive a x → motive a x) → motive a x := rfl
theorem Even.add : Even n → Even m → Even (n+m) := by
intro h1 h2
induction h2 with
| zero => exact h1
| ss h2 ih => exact ss ih
theorem Even.add' : Even n → Even m → Even (n+m)
| h1, zero => h1
| h1, ss h2 => ss (add' h1 h2) -- the structural recursion in being performed on the implicit `Nat` parameter
theorem mul_left_comm (n m o : Nat) : n * (m * o) = m * (n * o) := by
rw [← Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n m, Nat.mul_assoc]
inductive Power2 : Nat → Prop
| base : Power2 1
| ind : Power2 n → Power2 (2*n) -- Note that index here is not a constructor
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``Power2.base #[]
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``Power2.ind #[1, 2]
theorem Power2_brecOn : typeOf @Power2.brecOn = ∀ {motive : (a : Nat) → Power2 a → Prop} {a : Nat} (x : Power2 a),
(∀ (a : Nat) (x : Power2 a), @Power2.below motive a x → motive a x) → motive a x := rfl
theorem Power2.mul : Power2 n → Power2 m → Power2 (n*m) := by
intro h1 h2
induction h2 with
| base => simp_all
| ind h2 ih => exact mul_left_comm .. ▸ ind ih
/- The following example fails because the structural recursion cannot be performed on the `Nat`s and
the `brecOn` construction doesn't work for inductive predicates -/
-- theorem Power2.mul' : Power2 n → Power2 m → Power2 (n*m)
-- | h1, base => by simp_all
-- | h1, ind h2 => mul_left_comm .. ▸ ind (mul' h1 h2)
inductive tm : Type :=
| C : Nat → tm
| P : tm → tm → tm
open tm
set_option hygiene false in
infixl:40 " ==> " => step
inductive step : tm → tm → Prop :=
| ST_PlusConstConst : ∀ n1 n2,
P (C n1) (C n2) ==> C (n1 + n2)
| ST_Plus1 : ∀ t1 t1' t2,
t1 ==> t1' →
P t1 t2 ==> P t1' t2
| ST_Plus2 : ∀ n1 t2 t2',
t2 ==> t2' →
P (C n1) t2 ==> P (C n1) t2'
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``step.ST_PlusConstConst #[1, 2]
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``step.ST_Plus1 #[1, 2, 3, 4]
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``step.ST_Plus2 #[1, 2, 3, 4]
def deterministic {X : Type} (R : X → X → Prop) :=
∀ x y1 y2 : X, R x y1 → R x y2 → y1 = y2
theorem step_deterministic' : deterministic step := λ x y₁ y₂ hy₁ hy₂ =>
@step.brecOn (λ s t st => ∀ y₂, s ==> y₂ → t = y₂) _ _ hy₁ (λ s t st hy₁ y₂ hy₂ =>
match hy₁, hy₂ with
| step.below.ST_PlusConstConst _ _, step.ST_PlusConstConst _ _ => rfl
| step.below.ST_Plus1 _ _ _ hy₁ ih, step.ST_Plus1 _ t₁' _ _ => by rw [←ih t₁']; assumption
| step.below.ST_Plus1 _ _ _ hy₁ ih, step.ST_Plus2 _ _ _ _ => by cases hy₁
| step.below.ST_Plus2 _ _ _ _ ih, step.ST_Plus2 _ _ t₂ _ => by rw [←ih t₂]; assumption
| step.below.ST_Plus2 _ _ _ hy₁ _, step.ST_PlusConstConst _ _ => by cases hy₁
) y₂ hy₂
section NestedRecursion
axiom f : Nat → Nat
inductive is_nat : Nat -> Prop
| Z : is_nat 0
| S {n} : is_nat n → is_nat (f n)
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``is_nat.Z #[]
#eval checkGetBelowIndices ``is_nat.S #[1, 2]
axiom P : Nat → Prop
axiom F0 : P 0
axiom F1 : P (f 0)
axiom FS {n : Nat} : P n → P (f (f n))
-- we would like to write this
-- theorem foo : ∀ {n}, is_nat n → P n
-- | _, is_nat.Z => F0
-- | _, is_nat.S is_nat.Z => F1
-- | _, is_nat.S (is_nat.S h) => FS (foo h)
theorem foo' : ∀ {n}, is_nat n → P n := fun h =>
@is_nat.brecOn (fun n hn => P n) _ h fun n h ih =>
match ih with
| is_nat.below.Z => F0
| is_nat.below.S is_nat.below.Z _ => F1
| is_nat.below.S (is_nat.below.S b hx) h₂ => FS hx
end NestedRecursion
end Ex
|
142f3435f52e60058813645b33993ce026180949 | b70031c8e2c5337b91d7e70f1e0c5f528f7b0e77 | /src/linear_algebra/multilinear.lean | 1a54ff62d0390a1d4883fff292fefcb499941cec | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | molodiuc/mathlib | cae2ba3ef1601c1f42ca0b625c79b061b63fef5b | 98ebe5a6739fbe254f9ee9d401882d4388f91035 | refs/heads/master | 1,674,237,127,059 | 1,606,353,533,000 | 1,606,353,533,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 38,668 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import linear_algebra.basic
import algebra.algebra.basic
import tactic.omega
import data.fintype.sort
/-!
# Multilinear maps
We define multilinear maps as maps from `Π(i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂` which are linear in each
coordinate. Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type
(although some statements will require it to be a fintype). This space, denoted by
`multilinear_map R M₁ M₂`, inherits a module structure by pointwise addition and multiplication.
## Main definitions
* `multilinear_map R M₁ M₂` is the space of multilinear maps from `Π(i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂`.
* `f.map_smul` is the multiplicativity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_add` is the additivity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_smul_univ` expresses the multiplicativity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (λi, c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`.
* `f.map_add_univ` expresses the additivity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time, writing
`f (m + m')` as the sum over all subsets `s` of `ι` of `f (s.piecewise m m')`.
* `f.map_sum` expresses `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` as the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all possible functions.
We also register isomorphisms corresponding to currying or uncurrying variables, transforming a
multilinear function `f` on `n+1` variables into a linear function taking values in multilinear
functions in `n` variables, and into a multilinear function in `n` variables taking values in linear
functions. These operations are called `f.curry_left` and `f.curry_right` respectively
(with inverses `f.uncurry_left` and `f.uncurry_right`). These operations induce linear equivalences
between spaces of multilinear functions in `n+1` variables and spaces of linear functions into
multilinear functions in `n` variables (resp. multilinear functions in `n` variables taking values
in linear functions), called respectively `multilinear_curry_left_equiv` and
`multilinear_curry_right_equiv`.
## Implementation notes
Expressing that a map is linear along the `i`-th coordinate when all other coordinates are fixed
can be done in two (equivalent) different ways:
* fixing a vector `m : Π(j : ι - i), M₁ j.val`, and then choosing separately the `i`-th coordinate
* fixing a vector `m : Πj, M₁ j`, and then modifying its `i`-th coordinate
The second way is more artificial as the value of `m` at `i` is not relevant, but it has the
advantage of avoiding subtype inclusion issues. This is the definition we use, based on
`function.update` that allows to change the value of `m` at `i`.
-/
open function fin set
open_locale big_operators
universes u v v' v₁ v₂ v₃ w u'
variables {R : Type u} {ι : Type u'} {n : ℕ}
{M : fin n.succ → Type v} {M₁ : ι → Type v₁} {M₂ : Type v₂} {M₃ : Type v₃} {M' : Type v'}
[decidable_eq ι]
/-- Multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `Πi, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules
over `R`. -/
structure multilinear_map (R : Type u) {ι : Type u'} (M₁ : ι → Type v) (M₂ : Type w)
[decidable_eq ι] [semiring R] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)]
[semimodule R M₂] :=
(to_fun : (Πi, M₁ i) → M₂)
(map_add' : ∀(m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
to_fun (update m i (x + y)) = to_fun (update m i x) + to_fun (update m i y))
(map_smul' : ∀(m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
to_fun (update m i (c • x)) = c • to_fun (update m i x))
namespace multilinear_map
section semiring
variables [semiring R]
[∀i, add_comm_monoid (M i)] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
[add_comm_monoid M']
[∀i, semimodule R (M i)] [∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] [semimodule R M']
(f f' : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
instance : has_coe_to_fun (multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) := ⟨_, to_fun⟩
initialize_simps_projections multilinear_map (to_fun → apply)
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe : f.to_fun = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : (Π i, M₁ i) → M₂) (h₁ h₂ ) :
⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) = f := rfl
theorem congr_fun {f g : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂} (h : f = g) (x : Π i, M₁ i) : f x = g x :=
congr_arg (λ h : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂, h x) h
theorem congr_arg (f : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) {x y : Π i, M₁ i} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg (λ x : Π i, M₁ i, f x) h
theorem coe_inj ⦃f g : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂⦄ (h : ⇑f = g) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; cases h; refl
@[ext] theorem ext {f f' : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
coe_inj (funext H)
theorem ext_iff {f g : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, λ h, ext h⟩
@[simp] lemma map_add (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.map_add' m i x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.map_smul' m i c x
lemma map_coord_zero {m : Πi, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 :=
begin
have : (0 : R) • (0 : M₁ i) = 0, by simp,
rw [← update_eq_self i m, h, ← this, f.map_smul, zero_smul]
end
@[simp] lemma map_zero [nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 :=
begin
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ : ∃i:ι, i ∈ set.univ := set.exists_mem_of_nonempty ι,
exact map_coord_zero f i rfl
end
instance : has_add (multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λf f', ⟨λx, f x + f' x, λm i x y, by simp [add_left_comm, add_assoc], λm i c x, by simp [smul_add]⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m := rfl
instance : has_zero (multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨⟨λ _, 0, λm i x y, by simp, λm i c x, by simp⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (0 : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) m = 0 := rfl
instance : add_comm_monoid (multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), ..};
intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp] lemma sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
(m : Πi, M₁ i) : ∀ {s : finset α}, (∑ a in s, f a) m = ∑ a in s, f a m :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction,
{ rw finset.sum_empty, simp },
{ assume a s has H, rw finset.sum_insert has, simp [H, has] }
end
/-- If `f` is a multilinear map, then `f.to_linear_map m i` is the linear map obtained by fixing all
coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the `i`-th coordinate. -/
def to_linear_map (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := λx, f (update m i x),
map_add' := λx y, by simp,
map_smul' := λc x, by simp }
/-- The cartesian product of two multilinear maps, as a multilinear map. -/
def prod (f : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) (g : multilinear_map R M₁ M₃) :
multilinear_map R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ to_fun := λ m, (f m, g m),
map_add' := λ m i x y, by simp,
map_smul' := λ m i c x, by simp }
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `fin n`) and a subset `s` of `k`
of these variables, one gets a new multilinear map on `fin k` by varying these variables, and fixing
the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by `f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a
proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit identification between `fin k` and `s` that
we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
noncomputable def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : multilinear_map R (λ i : fin n, M') M₂) (s : finset (fin n))
(hk : s.card = k) (z : M') :
multilinear_map R (λ i : fin k, M') M₂ :=
{ to_fun := λ v, f (λ j, if h : j ∈ s then v ((s.mono_equiv_of_fin hk).symm ⟨j, h⟩) else z),
map_add' := λ v i x y,
by { erw [dite_comp_equiv_update, dite_comp_equiv_update, dite_comp_equiv_update], simp },
map_smul' := λ v i c x, by { erw [dite_comp_equiv_update, dite_comp_equiv_update], simp } }
variable {R}
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
lemma cons_add (f : multilinear_map R M M₂) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x+y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) :=
by rw [← update_cons_zero x m (x+y), f.map_add, update_cons_zero, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
lemma cons_smul (f : multilinear_map R M M₂) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.succ) (c : R) (x : M 0) :
f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) :=
by rw [← update_cons_zero x m (c • x), f.map_smul, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` using `snoc`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
lemma snoc_add (f : multilinear_map R M M₂) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.cast_succ) (x y : M (last n)) :
f (snoc m (x+y)) = f (snoc m x) + f (snoc m y) :=
by rw [← update_snoc_last x m (x+y), f.map_add, update_snoc_last, update_snoc_last]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
lemma snoc_smul (f : multilinear_map R M M₂)
(m : Π(i : fin n), M i.cast_succ) (c : R) (x : M (last n)) :
f (snoc m (c • x)) = c • f (snoc m x) :=
by rw [← update_snoc_last x m (c • x), f.map_smul, update_snoc_last]
section
variables {M₁' : ι → Type*} [Π i, add_comm_monoid (M₁' i)] [Π i, semimodule R (M₁' i)]
/-- If `g` is a multilinear map and `f` is a collection of linear maps,
then `g (f₁ m₁, ..., fₙ mₙ)` is again a multilinear map, that we call
`g.comp_linear_map f`. -/
def comp_linear_map (g : multilinear_map R M₁' M₂) (f : Π i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
multilinear_map R M₁ M₂ :=
{ to_fun := λ m, g $ λ i, f i (m i),
map_add' := λ m i x y,
have ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (λ k, f k (m k)) i (f i z) j :=
λ j z, function.apply_update (λ k, f k) _ _ _ _,
by simp [this],
map_smul' := λ m i c x,
have ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (λ k, f k (m k)) i (f i z) j :=
λ j z, function.apply_update (λ k, f k) _ _ _ _,
by simp [this] }
@[simp] lemma comp_linear_map_apply (g : multilinear_map R M₁' M₂) (f : Π i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
(m : Π i, M₁ i) :
g.comp_linear_map f m = g (λ i, f i (m i)) :=
rfl
end
/-- If one adds to a vector `m'` another vector `m`, but only for coordinates in a finset `t`, then
the image under a multilinear map `f` is the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` along all subsets `s` of
`t`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when `t = univ`, given in
`map_add_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not require the index set `ι`
to be finite.-/
lemma map_piecewise_add (m m' : Πi, M₁ i) (t : finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = ∑ s in t.powerset, f (s.piecewise m m') :=
begin
revert m',
refine finset.induction_on t (by simp) _,
assume i t hit Hrec m',
have A : (insert i t).piecewise (m + m') m' = update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i + m' i) :=
t.piecewise_insert _ _ _,
have B : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m' i) = t.piecewise (m + m') m',
{ ext j,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp [hit] },
{ simp [h] } },
let m'' := update m' i (m i),
have C : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i) = t.piecewise (m + m'') m'',
{ ext j,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp [m'', hit] },
{ by_cases h' : j ∈ t; simp [h, hit, m'', h'] } },
rw [A, f.map_add, B, C, finset.sum_powerset_insert hit, Hrec, Hrec, add_comm],
congr' 1,
apply finset.sum_congr rfl (λs hs, _),
have : (insert i s).piecewise m m' = s.piecewise m m'',
{ ext j,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp [m'', finset.not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem hs hit] },
{ by_cases h' : j ∈ s; simp [h, m'', h'] } },
rw this
end
/-- Additivity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
lemma map_add_univ [fintype ι] (m m' : Πi, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = ∑ s : finset ι, f (s.piecewise m m') :=
by simpa using f.map_piecewise_add m m' finset.univ
section apply_sum
variables {α : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] (g : Π i, α i → M₁ i) (A : Π i, finset (α i))
open_locale classical
open fintype finset
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. Here, we give an auxiliary statement tailored for an inductive proof. Use instead
`map_sum_finset`. -/
lemma map_sum_finset_aux {n : ℕ} (h : ∑ i, (A i).card = n) :
f (λ i, ∑ j in A i, g i j) = ∑ r in pi_finset A, f (λ i, g i (r i)) :=
begin
induction n using nat.strong_induction_on with n IH generalizing A,
-- If one of the sets is empty, then all the sums are zero
by_cases Ai_empty : ∃ i, A i = ∅,
{ rcases Ai_empty with ⟨i, hi⟩,
have : ∑ j in A i, g i j = 0, by convert sum_empty,
rw f.map_coord_zero i this,
have : pi_finset A = ∅,
{ apply finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (λ r hr, _),
have : r i ∈ A i := mem_pi_finset.mp hr i,
rwa hi at this },
convert sum_empty.symm },
push_neg at Ai_empty,
-- Otherwise, if all sets are at most singletons, then they are exactly singletons and the result
-- is again straightforward
by_cases Ai_singleton : ∀ i, (A i).card ≤ 1,
{ have Ai_card : ∀ i, (A i).card = 1,
{ assume i,
have : finset.card (A i) ≠ 0, by simp [finset.card_eq_zero, Ai_empty i],
have : finset.card (A i) ≤ 1 := Ai_singleton i,
omega },
have : ∀ (r : Π i, α i), r ∈ pi_finset A → f (λ i, g i (r i)) = f (λ i, ∑ j in A i, g i j),
{ assume r hr,
unfold_coes,
congr' with i,
have : ∀ j ∈ A i, g i j = g i (r i),
{ assume j hj,
congr,
apply finset.card_le_one_iff.1 (Ai_singleton i) hj,
exact mem_pi_finset.mp hr i },
simp only [finset.sum_congr rfl this, finset.mem_univ, finset.sum_const, Ai_card i,
one_nsmul] },
simp only [sum_congr rfl this, Ai_card, card_pi_finset, prod_const_one, one_nsmul,
sum_const] },
-- Remains the interesting case where one of the `A i`, say `A i₀`, has cardinality at least 2.
-- We will split into two parts `B i₀` and `C i₀` of smaller cardinality, let `B i = C i = A i`
-- for `i ≠ i₀`, apply the inductive assumption to `B` and `C`, and add up the corresponding
-- parts to get the sum for `A`.
push_neg at Ai_singleton,
obtain ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ : ∃ i, 1 < (A i).card := Ai_singleton,
obtain ⟨j₁, j₂, hj₁, hj₂, j₁_ne_j₂⟩ : ∃ j₁ j₂, (j₁ ∈ A i₀) ∧ (j₂ ∈ A i₀) ∧ j₁ ≠ j₂ :=
finset.one_lt_card_iff.1 hi₀,
let B := function.update A i₀ (A i₀ \ {j₂}),
let C := function.update A i₀ {j₂},
have B_subset_A : ∀ i, B i ⊆ A i,
{ assume i,
by_cases hi : i = i₀,
{ rw hi, simp only [B, sdiff_subset, update_same]},
{ simp only [hi, B, update_noteq, ne.def, not_false_iff, finset.subset.refl] } },
have C_subset_A : ∀ i, C i ⊆ A i,
{ assume i,
by_cases hi : i = i₀,
{ rw hi, simp only [C, hj₂, finset.singleton_subset_iff, update_same] },
{ simp only [hi, C, update_noteq, ne.def, not_false_iff, finset.subset.refl] } },
-- split the sum at `i₀` as the sum over `B i₀` plus the sum over `C i₀`, to use additivity.
have A_eq_BC : (λ i, ∑ j in A i, g i j) =
function.update (λ i, ∑ j in A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j in B i₀, g i₀ j + ∑ j in C i₀, g i₀ j),
{ ext i,
by_cases hi : i = i₀,
{ rw [hi],
simp only [function.update_same],
have : A i₀ = B i₀ ∪ C i₀,
{ simp only [B, C, function.update_same, finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union],
symmetry,
simp only [hj₂, finset.singleton_subset_iff, union_eq_left_iff_subset] },
rw this,
apply finset.sum_union,
apply finset.disjoint_right.2 (λ j hj, _),
have : j = j₂, by { dsimp [C] at hj, simpa using hj },
rw this,
dsimp [B],
simp only [mem_sdiff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, not_false_iff, finset.mem_singleton,
update_same, and_false] },
{ simp [hi] } },
have Beq : function.update (λ i, ∑ j in A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j in B i₀, g i₀ j) =
(λ i, ∑ j in B i, g i j),
{ ext i,
by_cases hi : i = i₀,
{ rw hi, simp only [update_same] },
{ simp only [hi, B, update_noteq, ne.def, not_false_iff] } },
have Ceq : function.update (λ i, ∑ j in A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j in C i₀, g i₀ j) =
(λ i, ∑ j in C i, g i j),
{ ext i,
by_cases hi : i = i₀,
{ rw hi, simp only [update_same] },
{ simp only [hi, C, update_noteq, ne.def, not_false_iff] } },
-- Express the inductive assumption for `B`
have Brec : f (λ i, ∑ j in B i, g i j) = ∑ r in pi_finset B, f (λ i, g i (r i)),
{ have : ∑ i, finset.card (B i) < ∑ i, finset.card (A i),
{ refine finset.sum_lt_sum (λ i hi, finset.card_le_of_subset (B_subset_A i))
⟨i₀, finset.mem_univ _, _⟩,
have : {j₂} ⊆ A i₀, by simp [hj₂],
simp only [B, finset.card_sdiff this, function.update_same, finset.card_singleton],
exact nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt (lt_trans nat.zero_lt_one hi₀)) },
rw h at this,
exact IH _ this B rfl },
-- Express the inductive assumption for `C`
have Crec : f (λ i, ∑ j in C i, g i j) = ∑ r in pi_finset C, f (λ i, g i (r i)),
{ have : ∑ i, finset.card (C i) < ∑ i, finset.card (A i) :=
finset.sum_lt_sum (λ i hi, finset.card_le_of_subset (C_subset_A i))
⟨i₀, finset.mem_univ _, by simp [C, hi₀]⟩,
rw h at this,
exact IH _ this C rfl },
have D : disjoint (pi_finset B) (pi_finset C),
{ have : disjoint (B i₀) (C i₀), by simp [B, C],
exact pi_finset_disjoint_of_disjoint B C this },
have pi_BC : pi_finset A = pi_finset B ∪ pi_finset C,
{ apply finset.subset.antisymm,
{ assume r hr,
by_cases hri₀ : r i₀ = j₂,
{ apply finset.mem_union_right,
apply mem_pi_finset.2 (λ i, _),
by_cases hi : i = i₀,
{ have : r i₀ ∈ C i₀, by simp [C, hri₀],
convert this },
{ simp [C, hi, mem_pi_finset.1 hr i] } },
{ apply finset.mem_union_left,
apply mem_pi_finset.2 (λ i, _),
by_cases hi : i = i₀,
{ have : r i₀ ∈ B i₀,
by simp [B, hri₀, mem_pi_finset.1 hr i₀],
convert this },
{ simp [B, hi, mem_pi_finset.1 hr i] } } },
{ exact finset.union_subset (pi_finset_subset _ _ (λ i, B_subset_A i))
(pi_finset_subset _ _ (λ i, C_subset_A i)) } },
rw A_eq_BC,
simp only [multilinear_map.map_add, Beq, Ceq, Brec, Crec, pi_BC],
rw ← finset.sum_union D,
end
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
lemma map_sum_finset :
f (λ i, ∑ j in A i, g i j) = ∑ r in pi_finset A, f (λ i, g i (r i)) :=
f.map_sum_finset_aux _ _ rfl
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
lemma map_sum [∀ i, fintype (α i)] :
f (λ i, ∑ j, g i j) = ∑ r : Π i, α i, f (λ i, g i (r i)) :=
f.map_sum_finset g (λ i, finset.univ)
end apply_sum
section restrict_scalar
variables (R) {A : Type*} [semiring A] [has_scalar R A] [Π (i : ι), semimodule A (M₁ i)]
[semimodule A M₂] [∀ i, is_scalar_tower R A (M₁ i)] [is_scalar_tower R A M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an `A`-multilinear map as an `R`-multilinear map, if `A` is an algebra over `R`
and their actions on all involved semimodules agree with the action of `R` on `A`. -/
def restrict_scalars (f : multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_add' := f.map_add,
map_smul' := λ m i, (f.to_linear_map m i).map_smul_of_tower }
@[simp] lemma coe_restrict_scalars (f : multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :
⇑(f.restrict_scalars R) = f := rfl
end restrict_scalar
end semiring
end multilinear_map
namespace linear_map
variables [semiring R] [Πi, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
[∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear map gives again a multilinear map. -/
def comp_multilinear_map (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :
multilinear_map R M₁ M₃ :=
{ to_fun := g ∘ f,
map_add' := λ m i x y, by simp,
map_smul' := λ m i c x, by simp }
@[simp] lemma coe_comp_multilinear_map (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :
⇑(g.comp_multilinear_map f) = g ∘ f := rfl
lemma comp_multilinear_map_apply (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) (m : Π i, M₁ i) :
g.comp_multilinear_map f m = g (f m) := rfl
end linear_map
namespace multilinear_map
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (M i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[∀i, semimodule R (M i)] [∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂]
(f f' : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
/-- If one multiplies by `c i` the coordinates in a finset `s`, then the image under a multilinear
map is multiplied by `∏ i in s, c i`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when
`s = univ`, given in `map_smul_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not
require the index set `ι` to be finite. -/
lemma map_piecewise_smul (c : ι → R) (m : Πi, M₁ i) (s : finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (λi, c i • m i) m) = (∏ i in s, c i) • f m :=
begin
refine s.induction_on (by simp) _,
assume j s j_not_mem_s Hrec,
have A : function.update (s.piecewise (λi, c i • m i) m) j (m j) =
s.piecewise (λi, c i • m i) m,
{ ext i,
by_cases h : i = j,
{ rw h, simp [j_not_mem_s] },
{ simp [h] } },
rw [s.piecewise_insert, f.map_smul, A, Hrec],
simp [j_not_mem_s, mul_smul]
end
/-- Multiplicativity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (λi, c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`. -/
lemma map_smul_univ [fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : Πi, M₁ i) :
f (λi, c i • m i) = (∏ i, c i) • f m :=
by simpa using map_piecewise_smul f c m finset.univ
section semimodule
variables {R' A : Type*} [comm_semiring R'] [semiring A] [algebra R' A]
[Π i, semimodule A (M₁ i)] [semimodule R' M₂] [semimodule A M₂] [is_scalar_tower R' A M₂]
instance : has_scalar R' (multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) := ⟨λ c f,
⟨λ m, c • f m, λm i x y, by simp [smul_add], λl i x d, by simp [smul_comm c x] ⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (f : multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) (c : R') (m : Πi, M₁ i) :
(c • f) m = c • f m := rfl
/-- The space of multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the pointwise
addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : semimodule R' (multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :=
{ one_smul := λ f, ext $ λ x, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ c₁ c₂ f, ext $ λ x, mul_smul _ _ _,
smul_zero := λ r, ext $ λ x, smul_zero _,
smul_add := λ r f₁ f₂, ext $ λ x, smul_add _ _ _,
add_smul := λ r₁ r₂ f, ext $ λ x, add_smul _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ f, ext $ λ x, zero_smul _ _ }
end semimodule
section
variables (R ι) (A : Type*) [comm_semiring A] [algebra R A] [fintype ι]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mk_pi_algebra` is the multilinear map on `A^ι` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin` for a version that works with a non-commutative
algebra `A` but requires `ι = fin n`. -/
protected def mk_pi_algebra : multilinear_map R (λ i : ι, A) A :=
{ to_fun := λ m, ∏ i, m i,
map_add' := λ m i x y, by simp [finset.prod_update_of_mem, add_mul],
map_smul' := λ m i c x, by simp [finset.prod_update_of_mem] }
variables {R A ι}
@[simp] lemma mk_pi_algebra_apply (m : ι → A) :
multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra R ι A m = ∏ i, m i :=
rfl
end
section
variables (R n) (A : Type*) [semiring A] [algebra R A]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mk_pi_algebra_fin` is the multilinear map on `A^n` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra` for a version that assumes `[comm_semiring A]` but works
for `A^ι` with any finite type `ι`. -/
protected def mk_pi_algebra_fin : multilinear_map R (λ i : fin n, A) A :=
{ to_fun := λ m, (list.of_fn m).prod,
map_add' :=
begin
intros m i x y,
have : (list.fin_range n).index_of i < n,
by simpa using list.index_of_lt_length.2 (list.mem_fin_range i),
simp [list.of_fn_eq_map, (list.nodup_fin_range n).map_update, list.prod_update_nth, add_mul,
this, mul_add, add_mul]
end,
map_smul' :=
begin
intros m i c x,
have : (list.fin_range n).index_of i < n,
by simpa using list.index_of_lt_length.2 (list.mem_fin_range i),
simp [list.of_fn_eq_map, (list.nodup_fin_range n).map_update, list.prod_update_nth, this]
end }
variables {R A n}
@[simp] lemma mk_pi_algebra_fin_apply (m : fin n → A) :
multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin R n A m = (list.of_fn m).prod :=
rfl
lemma mk_pi_algebra_fin_apply_const (a : A) :
multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin R n A (λ _, a) = a ^ n :=
by simp
end
/-- Given an `R`-multilinear map `f` taking values in `R`, `f.smul_right z` is the map
sending `m` to `f m • z`. -/
def smul_right (f : multilinear_map R M₁ R) (z : M₂) : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂ :=
(linear_map.smul_right linear_map.id z).comp_multilinear_map f
@[simp] lemma smul_right_apply (f : multilinear_map R M₁ R) (z : M₂) (m : Π i, M₁ i) :
f.smul_right z m = f m • z :=
rfl
variables (R ι)
/-- The canonical multilinear map on `R^ι` when `ι` is finite, associating to `m` the product of
all the `m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module). See also
`mk_pi_algebra` for a more general version. -/
protected def mk_pi_ring [fintype ι] (z : M₂) : multilinear_map R (λ(i : ι), R) M₂ :=
(multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra R ι R).smul_right z
variables {R ι}
@[simp] lemma mk_pi_ring_apply [fintype ι] (z : M₂) (m : ι → R) :
(multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring R ι z : (ι → R) → M₂) m = (∏ i, m i) • z := rfl
lemma mk_pi_ring_apply_one_eq_self [fintype ι] (f : multilinear_map R (λ(i : ι), R) M₂) :
multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring R ι (f (λi, 1)) = f :=
begin
ext m,
have : m = (λi, m i • 1), by { ext j, simp },
conv_rhs { rw [this, f.map_smul_univ] },
refl
end
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] [∀i, add_comm_group (M₁ i)] [add_comm_group M₂]
[∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂]
(f : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
@[simp] lemma map_sub (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) :=
by { simp only [map_add, add_left_inj, sub_eq_add_neg, (neg_one_smul R y).symm, map_smul], simp }
instance : has_neg (multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨λ m, - f m, λm i x y, by simp [add_comm], λm i c x, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (-f) m = - (f m) := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, ..};
intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
end ring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [∀i, add_comm_group (M₁ i)] [add_comm_group M₂]
[∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂]
/-- When `ι` is finite, multilinear maps on `R^ι` with values in `M₂` are in bijection with `M₂`,
as such a multilinear map is completely determined by its value on the constant vector made of ones.
We register this bijection as a linear equivalence in `multilinear_map.pi_ring_equiv`. -/
protected def pi_ring_equiv [fintype ι] : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R (λ(i : ι), R) M₂) :=
{ to_fun := λ z, multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring R ι z,
inv_fun := λ f, f (λi, 1),
map_add' := λ z z', by { ext m, simp [smul_add] },
map_smul' := λ c z, by { ext m, simp [smul_smul, mul_comm] },
left_inv := λ z, by simp,
right_inv := λ f, f.mk_pi_ring_apply_one_eq_self }
end comm_semiring
end multilinear_map
section currying
/-!
### Currying
We associate to a multilinear map in `n+1` variables (i.e., based on `fin n.succ`) two
curried functions, named `f.curry_left` (which is a linear map on `E 0` taking values
in multilinear maps in `n` variables) and `f.curry_right` (wich is a multilinear map in `n`
variables taking values in linear maps on `E 0`). In both constructions, the variable that is
singled out is `0`, to take advantage of the operations `cons` and `tail` on `fin n`.
The inverse operations are called `uncurry_left` and `uncurry_right`.
We also register linear equiv versions of these correspondences, in
`multilinear_curry_left_equiv` and `multilinear_curry_right_equiv`.
-/
open multilinear_map
variables {R M M₂}
[comm_ring R] [∀i, add_comm_group (M i)] [add_comm_group M'] [add_comm_group M₂]
[∀i, module R (M i)] [module R M'] [module R M₂]
/-! #### Left currying -/
/-- Given a linear map `f` from `M 0` to multilinear maps on `n` variables,
construct the corresponding multilinear map on `n+1` variables obtained by concatenating
the variables, given by `m ↦ f (m 0) (tail m)`-/
def linear_map.uncurry_left
(f : M 0 →ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.succ) M₂)) :
multilinear_map R M M₂ :=
{ to_fun := λm, f (m 0) (tail m),
map_add' := λm i x y, begin
by_cases h : i = 0,
{ revert x y,
rw h,
assume x y,
rw [update_same, update_same, update_same, f.map_add, add_apply,
tail_update_zero, tail_update_zero, tail_update_zero] },
{ rw [update_noteq (ne.symm h), update_noteq (ne.symm h), update_noteq (ne.symm h)],
revert x y,
rw ← succ_pred i h,
assume x y,
rw [tail_update_succ, map_add, tail_update_succ, tail_update_succ] }
end,
map_smul' := λm i c x, begin
by_cases h : i = 0,
{ revert x,
rw h,
assume x,
rw [update_same, update_same, tail_update_zero, tail_update_zero,
← smul_apply, f.map_smul] },
{ rw [update_noteq (ne.symm h), update_noteq (ne.symm h)],
revert x,
rw ← succ_pred i h,
assume x,
rw [tail_update_succ, tail_update_succ, map_smul] }
end }
@[simp] lemma linear_map.uncurry_left_apply
(f : M 0 →ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.succ) M₂)) (m : Πi, M i) :
f.uncurry_left m = f (m 0) (tail m) := rfl
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` in `n+1` variables, split the first variable to obtain
a linear map into multilinear maps in `n` variables, given by `x ↦ (m ↦ f (cons x m))`. -/
def multilinear_map.curry_left
(f : multilinear_map R M M₂) :
M 0 →ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.succ) M₂) :=
{ to_fun := λx,
{ to_fun := λm, f (cons x m),
map_add' := λm i y y', by simp,
map_smul' := λm i y c, by simp },
map_add' := λx y, by { ext m, exact cons_add f m x y },
map_smul' := λc x, by { ext m, exact cons_smul f m c x } }
@[simp] lemma multilinear_map.curry_left_apply
(f : multilinear_map R M M₂) (x : M 0) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.succ) :
f.curry_left x m = f (cons x m) := rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_map.curry_uncurry_left
(f : M 0 →ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.succ) M₂)) :
f.uncurry_left.curry_left = f :=
begin
ext m x,
simp only [tail_cons, linear_map.uncurry_left_apply, multilinear_map.curry_left_apply],
rw cons_zero
end
@[simp] lemma multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left
(f : multilinear_map R M M₂) :
f.curry_left.uncurry_left = f :=
by { ext m, simp }
variables (R M M₂)
/-- The space of multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of linear maps from `M 0` to the space of multilinear maps on
`Π(i : fin n), M i.succ `, by separating the first variable. We register this isomorphism as a
linear isomorphism in `multilinear_curry_left_equiv R M M₂`.
The direct and inverse maps are given by `f.uncurry_left` and `f.curry_left`. Use these
unless you need the full framework of linear equivs. -/
def multilinear_curry_left_equiv :
(M 0 →ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.succ) M₂)) ≃ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R M M₂) :=
{ to_fun := linear_map.uncurry_left,
map_add' := λf₁ f₂, by { ext m, refl },
map_smul' := λc f, by { ext m, refl },
inv_fun := multilinear_map.curry_left,
left_inv := linear_map.curry_uncurry_left,
right_inv := multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left }
variables {R M M₂}
/-! #### Right currying -/
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` in `n` variables to the space of linear maps from `M (last n)` to
`M₂`, construct the corresponding multilinear map on `n+1` variables obtained by concatenating
the variables, given by `m ↦ f (init m) (m (last n))`-/
def multilinear_map.uncurry_right
(f : (multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.cast_succ) (M (last n) →ₗ[R] M₂))) :
multilinear_map R M M₂ :=
{ to_fun := λm, f (init m) (m (last n)),
map_add' := λm i x y, begin
by_cases h : i.val < n,
{ have : last n ≠ i := ne.symm (ne_of_lt h),
rw [update_noteq this, update_noteq this, update_noteq this],
revert x y,
rw [(cast_succ_cast_lt i h).symm],
assume x y,
rw [init_update_cast_succ, map_add, init_update_cast_succ, init_update_cast_succ,
linear_map.add_apply] },
{ revert x y,
rw eq_last_of_not_lt h,
assume x y,
rw [init_update_last, init_update_last, init_update_last,
update_same, update_same, update_same, linear_map.map_add] }
end,
map_smul' := λm i c x, begin
by_cases h : i.val < n,
{ have : last n ≠ i := ne.symm (ne_of_lt h),
rw [update_noteq this, update_noteq this],
revert x,
rw [(cast_succ_cast_lt i h).symm],
assume x,
rw [init_update_cast_succ, init_update_cast_succ, map_smul, linear_map.smul_apply] },
{ revert x,
rw eq_last_of_not_lt h,
assume x,
rw [update_same, update_same, init_update_last, init_update_last,
linear_map.map_smul] }
end }
@[simp] lemma multilinear_map.uncurry_right_apply
(f : (multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.cast_succ) ((M (last n)) →ₗ[R] M₂))) (m : Πi, M i) :
f.uncurry_right m = f (init m) (m (last n)) := rfl
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` in `n+1` variables, split the last variable to obtain
a multilinear map in `n` variables taking values in linear maps from `M (last n)` to `M₂`, given by
`m ↦ (x ↦ f (snoc m x))`. -/
def multilinear_map.curry_right (f : multilinear_map R M M₂) :
multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M (fin.cast_succ i)) ((M (last n)) →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
{ to_fun := λm,
{ to_fun := λx, f (snoc m x),
map_add' := λx y, by rw f.snoc_add,
map_smul' := λc x, by rw f.snoc_smul },
map_add' := λm i x y, begin
ext z,
change f (snoc (update m i (x + y)) z)
= f (snoc (update m i x) z) + f (snoc (update m i y) z),
rw [snoc_update, snoc_update, snoc_update, f.map_add]
end,
map_smul' := λm i c x, begin
ext z,
change f (snoc (update m i (c • x)) z) = c • f (snoc (update m i x) z),
rw [snoc_update, snoc_update, f.map_smul]
end }
@[simp] lemma multilinear_map.curry_right_apply
(f : multilinear_map R M M₂) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.cast_succ) (x : M (last n)) :
f.curry_right m x = f (snoc m x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma multilinear_map.curry_uncurry_right
(f : (multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.cast_succ) ((M (last n)) →ₗ[R] M₂))) :
f.uncurry_right.curry_right = f :=
begin
ext m x,
simp only [snoc_last, multilinear_map.curry_right_apply, multilinear_map.uncurry_right_apply],
rw init_snoc
end
@[simp] lemma multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_right
(f : multilinear_map R M M₂) : f.curry_right.uncurry_right = f :=
by { ext m, simp }
variables (R M M₂)
/-- The space of multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of linear maps from the space of multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin n), M i.cast_succ` to the
space of linear maps on `M (last n)`, by separating the last variable. We register this isomorphism
as a linear isomorphism in `multilinear_curry_right_equiv R M M₂`.
The direct and inverse maps are given by `f.uncurry_right` and `f.curry_right`. Use these
unless you need the full framework of linear equivs. -/
def multilinear_curry_right_equiv :
(multilinear_map R (λ(i : fin n), M i.cast_succ) ((M (last n)) →ₗ[R] M₂))
≃ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R M M₂) :=
{ to_fun := multilinear_map.uncurry_right,
map_add' := λf₁ f₂, by { ext m, refl },
map_smul' := λc f, by { ext m, rw [smul_apply], refl },
inv_fun := multilinear_map.curry_right,
left_inv := multilinear_map.curry_uncurry_right,
right_inv := multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_right }
end currying
|
53a1f013cdbc678aad0f40cc2bc06931f2f05cd0 | aa3f8992ef7806974bc1ffd468baa0c79f4d6643 | /tests/lean/run/n3.lean | 576d1dbd1b8f25d2edb1c7210fcac6f70e4046e5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean | 7f8dff750722c5382bdd0a9a9275dc4bb2c58dd3 | 0cca265db19f7296531e339192e9b9bae4a31f8b | refs/heads/master | 1,610,909,964,159 | 1,407,084,399,000 | 1,416,857,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 607 | lean | definition Prop : Type.{1} := Type.{0}
constant N : Type.{1}
constant and : Prop → Prop → Prop
infixr `∧`:35 := and
constant le : N → N → Prop
constant lt : N → N → Prop
constant f : N → N
constant add : N → N → N
infixl `+`:65 := add
precedence `≤`:50
precedence `<`:50
infixl ≤ := le
infixl < := lt
notation A ≤ B:prev ≤ C:prev := A ≤ B ∧ B ≤ C
notation A ≤ B:prev < C:prev := A ≤ B ∧ B < C
notation A < B:prev ≤ C:prev := A < B ∧ B ≤ C
constants a b c d e : N
check a ≤ b ≤ f c + b ∧ a < b
check a ≤ d
check a < b ≤ c
check a ≤ b < c
check a < b
|
39fd5a557169ce4b43665e3e7af302f73879816f | 2cf781335f4a6706b7452ab07ce323201e2e101f | /lean/deps/galois_stdlib/src/galois/data/nat/basic.lean | 6e2b9ed5654a37f1a96e2621dd1cb0f08f31ad94 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | simonjwinwood/reopt-vcg | 697cdd5e68366b5aa3298845eebc34fc97ccfbe2 | 6aca24e759bff4f2230bb58270bac6746c13665e | refs/heads/master | 1,586,353,878,347 | 1,549,667,148,000 | 1,549,667,148,000 | 159,409,828 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,543,358,444,000 | 1,543,358,444,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,366 | lean | import data.nat.basic
-- This file contains basic lemmas for nat
namespace nat
/-- pred _ + _ rewrite rule. -/
theorem pred_add (m n : ℕ) : pred m + n = if m = 0 then n else pred (m + n) :=
begin
cases m,
case zero {
simp,
},
case succ : m {
have p : ¬(succ m = 0) := by trivial,
simp [pred, p],
},
end
/-- _ + pred _ rewrite rule. -/
theorem add_pred (m n : ℕ) : m + pred n = if n = 0 then m else pred (m + n) :=
begin
cases n,
case zero {
simp,
},
case succ : n {
have p : ¬(succ n = 0) := by trivial,
simp [pred, p],
},
end
-- Reduce x < y to theorem with addition
protected theorem lt_is_succ_le (x y : ℕ) : x < y ↔ x + 1 ≤ y := by trivial
-- Reduce succ x < succ y
protected lemma succ_lt_succ_iff : ∀{m n : ℕ}, succ n < succ m ↔ n < m :=
begin
intros m n,
simp [nat.lt_is_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff],
end
-- This rewrites a subtraction on left-hand-side of inequality into a predicate
-- involving addition.
protected lemma sub_lt_to_add (a m n : ℕ) : a - n < m ↔ (a < m + n ∧ (n ≤ a ∨ 0 < m)) :=
begin
revert a m,
induction n,
case zero {
intros a m,
simp [zero_le],
},
case succ : n ind {
intros a m,
cases a,
case zero {
simp [zero_sub, zero_lt_succ, not_succ_le_zero],
},
case succ {
simp [add_succ, nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_le_succ_iff, ind],
},
},
end
-- This rewrites a subtraction on right-hand side of inequality into an addition.
protected lemma lt_sub_iff (a m n : ℕ) : a < m - n ↔ a + n < m :=
begin
revert n,
induction m with m ind,
{ simp [nat.lt_is_succ_le, add_succ, not_succ_le_zero, zero_sub],
},
{ intro n,
cases n with n,
{ simp, },
{ simp [nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, ind],
},
},
end
lemma lt_one_is_zero (x:ℕ) : x < 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
begin
constructor,
{ intros x_lt_1,
apply eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_lt_succ x_lt_1),
},
{ intros, simp [a], exact (of_as_true trivial),
}
end
lemma mul_pow_add_lt_pow {x y n m:ℕ} (Hx: x < 2^m) (Hy: y < 2^n) : x * 2^n + y < 2^(m + n) :=
calc
x*2^n + y < x*2^n + 2^n : nat.add_lt_add_left Hy (x*2^n)
... = (x + 1) * 2^n : begin rw right_distrib, simp end
... ≤ 2^m * 2^n : nat.mul_le_mul_right (2^n) (succ_le_of_lt Hx)
... = 2^(m + n) : eq.symm (nat.pow_add _ _ _)
end nat
|
c0148a8cf05a93d3b595bfffdbea9c9ae7147bfa | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/ring_theory/witt_vector/structure_polynomial.lean | 522b51afd6e7f91ff9a97650e93946da2227919c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,487 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import field_theory.finite.polynomial
import number_theory.basic
import ring_theory.witt_vector.witt_polynomial
/-!
# Witt structure polynomials
In this file we prove the main theorem that makes the whole theory of Witt vectors work.
Briefly, consider a polynomial `Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ` over the integers,
with polynomials variables indexed by an arbitrary type `idx`.
Then there exists a unique family of polynomials `φ : ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) Φ`
such that for all `n : ℕ` we have (`witt_structure_int_exists_unique`)
```
bind₁ φ (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) = bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n))) Φ
```
In other words: evaluating the `n`-th Witt polynomial on the family `φ`
is the same as evaluating `Φ` on the (appropriately renamed) `n`-th Witt polynomials.
N.b.: As far as we know, these polynomials do not have a name in the literature,
so we have decided to call them the “Witt structure polynomials”. See `witt_structure_int`.
## Special cases
With the main result of this file in place, we apply it to certain special polynomials.
For example, by taking `Φ = X tt + X ff` resp. `Φ = X tt * X ff`
we obtain families of polynomials `witt_add` resp. `witt_mul`
(with type `ℕ → mv_polynomial (bool × ℕ) ℤ`) that will be used in later files to define the
addition and multiplication on the ring of Witt vectors.
## Outline of the proof
The proof of `witt_structure_int_exists_unique` is rather technical, and takes up most of this file.
We start by proving the analogous version for polynomials with rational coefficients,
instead of integer coefficients.
In this case, the solution is rather easy,
since the Witt polynomials form a faithful change of coordinates
in the polynomial ring `mv_polynomial ℕ ℚ`.
We therefore obtain a family of polynomials `witt_structure_rat Φ`
for every `Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ`.
If `Φ` has integer coefficients, then the polynomials `witt_structure_rat Φ n` do so as well.
Proving this claim is the essential core of this file, and culminates in
`map_witt_structure_int`, which proves that upon mapping the coefficients
of `witt_structure_int Φ n` from the integers to the rationals,
one obtains `witt_structure_rat Φ n`.
Ultimately, the proof of `map_witt_structure_int` relies on
```
dvd_sub_pow_of_dvd_sub {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {p : ℕ} {a b : R} :
(p : R) ∣ a - b → ∀ (k : ℕ), (p : R) ^ (k + 1) ∣ a ^ p ^ k - b ^ p ^ k
```
## Main results
* `witt_structure_rat Φ`: the family of polynomials `ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ`
associated with `Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ` and satisfying the property explained above.
* `witt_structure_rat_prop`: the proof that `witt_structure_rat` indeed satisfies the property.
* `witt_structure_int Φ`: the family of polynomials `ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ`
associated with `Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ` and satisfying the property explained above.
* `map_witt_structure_int`: the proof that the integral polynomials `with_structure_int Φ`
are equal to `witt_structure_rat Φ` when mapped to polynomials with rational coefficients.
* `witt_structure_int_prop`: the proof that `witt_structure_int` indeed satisfies the property.
* Five families of polynomials that will be used to define the ring structure
on the ring of Witt vectors:
- `witt_vector.witt_zero`
- `witt_vector.witt_one`
- `witt_vector.witt_add`
- `witt_vector.witt_mul`
- `witt_vector.witt_neg`
(We also define `witt_vector.witt_sub`, and later we will prove that it describes subtraction,
which is defined as `λ a b, a + -b`. See `witt_vector.sub_coeff` for this proof.)
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open mv_polynomial
open set
open finset (range)
open finsupp (single)
-- This lemma reduces a bundled morphism to a "mere" function,
-- and consequently the simplifier cannot use a lot of powerful simp-lemmas.
-- We disable this locally, and probably it should be disabled globally in mathlib.
local attribute [-simp] coe_eval₂_hom
variables {p : ℕ} {R : Type*} {idx : Type*} [comm_ring R]
open_locale witt
open_locale big_operators
section p_prime
variables (p) [hp : fact p.prime]
include hp
/-- `witt_structure_rat Φ` is a family of polynomials `ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ`
that are uniquely characterised by the property that
```
bind₁ (witt_structure_rat p Φ) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n) =
bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n))) Φ
```
In other words: evaluating the `n`-th Witt polynomial on the family `witt_structure_rat Φ`
is the same as evaluating `Φ` on the (appropriately renamed) `n`-th Witt polynomials.
See `witt_structure_rat_prop` for this property,
and `witt_structure_rat_exists_unique` for the fact that `witt_structure_rat`
gives the unique family of polynomials with this property.
These polynomials turn out to have integral coefficients,
but it requires some effort to show this.
See `witt_structure_int` for the version with integral coefficients,
and `map_witt_structure_int` for the fact that it is equal to `witt_structure_rat`
when mapped to polynomials over the rationals. -/
noncomputable def witt_structure_rat (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ :=
bind₁ (λ k, bind₁ (λ i, rename (prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ) (X_in_terms_of_W p ℚ n)
theorem witt_structure_rat_prop (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (witt_structure_rat p Φ) (W_ ℚ n) =
bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n))) Φ :=
calc bind₁ (witt_structure_rat p Φ) (W_ ℚ n)
= bind₁ (λ k, bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i)) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ)
(bind₁ (X_in_terms_of_W p ℚ) (W_ ℚ n)) :
by { rw bind₁_bind₁, exact eval₂_hom_congr (ring_hom.ext_rat _ _) rfl rfl }
... = bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n))) Φ :
by rw [bind₁_X_in_terms_of_W_witt_polynomial p _ n, bind₁_X_right]
theorem witt_structure_rat_exists_unique (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) :
∃! (φ : ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ),
∀ (n : ℕ), bind₁ φ (W_ ℚ n) = bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n))) Φ :=
begin
refine ⟨witt_structure_rat p Φ, _, _⟩,
{ intro n, apply witt_structure_rat_prop },
{ intros φ H,
funext n,
rw show φ n = bind₁ φ (bind₁ (W_ ℚ) (X_in_terms_of_W p ℚ n)),
{ rw [bind₁_witt_polynomial_X_in_terms_of_W p, bind₁_X_right] },
rw [bind₁_bind₁],
exact eval₂_hom_congr (ring_hom.ext_rat _ _) (funext H) rfl },
end
lemma witt_structure_rat_rec_aux (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
witt_structure_rat p Φ n * C (p ^ n : ℚ) =
bind₁ (λ b, rename (λ i, (b, i)) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ -
∑ i in range n, C (p ^ i : ℚ) * (witt_structure_rat p Φ i) ^ p ^ (n - i) :=
begin
have := X_in_terms_of_W_aux p ℚ n,
replace := congr_arg (bind₁ (λ k : ℕ, bind₁ (λ i, rename (prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ)) this,
rw [alg_hom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right] at this,
rw [witt_structure_rat, this], clear this,
conv_lhs { simp only [alg_hom.map_sub, bind₁_X_right] },
rw sub_right_inj,
simp only [alg_hom.map_sum, alg_hom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right, alg_hom.map_pow],
refl
end
/-- Write `witt_structure_rat p φ n` in terms of `witt_structure_rat p φ i` for `i < n`. -/
lemma witt_structure_rat_rec (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
(witt_structure_rat p Φ n) = C (1 / p ^ n : ℚ) *
(bind₁ (λ b, (rename (λ i, (b, i)) (W_ ℚ n))) Φ -
∑ i in range n, C (p ^ i : ℚ) * (witt_structure_rat p Φ i) ^ p ^ (n - i)) :=
begin
calc witt_structure_rat p Φ n
= C (1 / p ^ n : ℚ) * (witt_structure_rat p Φ n * C (p ^ n : ℚ)) : _
... = _ : by rw witt_structure_rat_rec_aux,
rw [mul_left_comm, ← C_mul, div_mul_cancel, C_1, mul_one],
exact pow_ne_zero _ (nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hp.1.ne_zero),
end
/-- `witt_structure_int Φ` is a family of polynomials `ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ`
that are uniquely characterised by the property that
```
bind₁ (witt_structure_int p Φ) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) =
bind₁ (λ i, (rename (prod.mk i) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n))) Φ
```
In other words: evaluating the `n`-th Witt polynomial on the family `witt_structure_int Φ`
is the same as evaluating `Φ` on the (appropriately renamed) `n`-th Witt polynomials.
See `witt_structure_int_prop` for this property,
and `witt_structure_int_exists_unique` for the fact that `witt_structure_int`
gives the unique family of polynomials with this property. -/
noncomputable def witt_structure_int (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) :
mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ :=
finsupp.map_range rat.num (rat.coe_int_num 0)
(witt_structure_rat p (map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) Φ) n)
variable {p}
lemma bind₁_rename_expand_witt_polynomial (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ)
(IH : ∀ m : ℕ, m < (n + 1) →
map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) (witt_structure_int p Φ m) =
witt_structure_rat p (map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) Φ) m) :
bind₁ (λ b, rename (λ i, (b, i)) (expand p (W_ ℤ n))) Φ =
bind₁ (λ i, expand p (witt_structure_int p Φ i)) (W_ ℤ n) :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.map_injective (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) int.cast_injective,
simp only [map_bind₁, map_rename, map_expand, rename_expand, map_witt_polynomial],
have key := (witt_structure_rat_prop p (map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) Φ) n).symm,
apply_fun expand p at key,
simp only [expand_bind₁] at key,
rw key, clear key,
apply eval₂_hom_congr' rfl _ rfl,
rintro i hi -,
rw [witt_polynomial_vars, finset.mem_range] at hi,
simp only [IH i hi],
end
lemma C_p_pow_dvd_bind₁_rename_witt_polynomial_sub_sum (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ)
(IH : ∀ m : ℕ, m < n →
map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) (witt_structure_int p Φ m) =
witt_structure_rat p (map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) Φ) m) :
C ↑(p ^ n) ∣
(bind₁ (λ (b : idx), rename (λ i, (b, i)) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n)) Φ -
∑ i in range n, C (↑p ^ i) * witt_structure_int p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i)) :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp only [is_unit_one, int.coe_nat_zero, int.coe_nat_succ,
zero_add, pow_zero, C_1, is_unit.dvd] },
-- prepare a useful equation for rewriting
have key := bind₁_rename_expand_witt_polynomial Φ n IH,
apply_fun (map (int.cast_ring_hom (zmod (p ^ (n + 1))))) at key,
conv_lhs at key { simp only [map_bind₁, map_rename, map_expand, map_witt_polynomial] },
-- clean up and massage
rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, C_dvd_iff_zmod, ring_hom.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_bind₁],
simp only [map_rename, map_witt_polynomial, witt_polynomial_zmod_self],
rw key, clear key IH,
rw [bind₁, aeval_witt_polynomial, ring_hom.map_sum, ring_hom.map_sum, finset.sum_congr rfl],
intros k hk,
rw [finset.mem_range, nat.lt_succ_iff] at hk,
simp only [← sub_eq_zero, ← ring_hom.map_sub, ← C_dvd_iff_zmod, C_eq_coe_nat, ← mul_sub,
← nat.cast_pow],
rw show p ^ (n + 1) = p ^ k * p ^ (n - k + 1),
{ rw [← pow_add, ←add_assoc], congr' 2, rw [add_comm, ←tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hk] },
rw [nat.cast_mul, nat.cast_pow, nat.cast_pow],
apply mul_dvd_mul_left,
rw show p ^ (n + 1 - k) = p * p ^ (n - k),
{ rw [← pow_succ, ← tsub_add_eq_add_tsub hk] },
rw [pow_mul],
-- the machine!
apply dvd_sub_pow_of_dvd_sub,
rw [← C_eq_coe_nat, C_dvd_iff_zmod, ring_hom.map_sub,
sub_eq_zero, map_expand, ring_hom.map_pow, mv_polynomial.expand_zmod],
end
variables (p)
@[simp] lemma map_witt_structure_int (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) :
map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) (witt_structure_int p Φ n) =
witt_structure_rat p (map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) Φ) n :=
begin
apply nat.strong_induction_on n, clear n,
intros n IH,
rw [witt_structure_int, map_map_range_eq_iff, int.coe_cast_ring_hom],
intro c,
rw [witt_structure_rat_rec, coeff_C_mul, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc', mul_one],
have sum_induction_steps : map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ)
(∑ i in range n, C (p ^ i : ℤ) *
(witt_structure_int p Φ i) ^ p ^ (n - i)) =
∑ i in range n, C (p ^ i : ℚ) *
(witt_structure_rat p (map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) Φ) i) ^ p ^ (n - i),
{ rw [ring_hom.map_sum],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
intros i hi,
rw finset.mem_range at hi,
simp only [IH i hi, ring_hom.map_mul, ring_hom.map_pow, map_C],
refl },
simp only [← sum_induction_steps, ← map_witt_polynomial p (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ),
← map_rename, ← map_bind₁, ← ring_hom.map_sub, coeff_map],
rw show (p : ℚ)^n = ((p^n : ℕ) : ℤ), by norm_cast,
rw [← rat.denom_eq_one_iff, eq_int_cast, rat.denom_div_cast_eq_one_iff],
swap, { exact_mod_cast pow_ne_zero n hp.1.ne_zero },
revert c, rw [← C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff],
exact C_p_pow_dvd_bind₁_rename_witt_polynomial_sub_sum Φ n IH,
end
variables (p)
theorem witt_structure_int_prop (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n) :
bind₁ (witt_structure_int p Φ) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) =
bind₁ (λ i, rename (prod.mk i) (W_ ℤ n)) Φ :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.map_injective (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) int.cast_injective,
have := witt_structure_rat_prop p (map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) Φ) n,
simpa only [map_bind₁, ← eval₂_hom_map_hom, eval₂_hom_C_left, map_rename,
map_witt_polynomial, alg_hom.coe_to_ring_hom, map_witt_structure_int],
end
lemma eq_witt_structure_int (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (φ : ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ)
(h : ∀ n, bind₁ φ (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) = bind₁ (λ i, rename (prod.mk i) (W_ ℤ n)) Φ) :
φ = witt_structure_int p Φ :=
begin
funext k,
apply mv_polynomial.map_injective (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) int.cast_injective,
rw map_witt_structure_int,
refine congr_fun _ k,
apply unique_of_exists_unique (witt_structure_rat_exists_unique p (map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) Φ)),
{ intro n,
specialize h n,
apply_fun map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) at h,
simpa only [map_bind₁, ← eval₂_hom_map_hom, eval₂_hom_C_left, map_rename,
map_witt_polynomial, alg_hom.coe_to_ring_hom] using h, },
{ intro n, apply witt_structure_rat_prop }
end
theorem witt_structure_int_exists_unique (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) :
∃! (φ : ℕ → mv_polynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ),
∀ (n : ℕ), bind₁ φ (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) = bind₁ (λ i : idx, (rename (prod.mk i) (W_ ℤ n))) Φ :=
⟨witt_structure_int p Φ, witt_structure_int_prop _ _, eq_witt_structure_int _ _⟩
theorem witt_structure_prop (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n) :
aeval (λ i, map (int.cast_ring_hom R) (witt_structure_int p Φ i)) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) =
aeval (λ i, rename (prod.mk i) (W n)) Φ :=
begin
convert congr_arg (map (int.cast_ring_hom R)) (witt_structure_int_prop p Φ n) using 1;
rw hom_bind₁; apply eval₂_hom_congr (ring_hom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl,
{ refl },
{ simp only [map_rename, map_witt_polynomial] }
end
lemma witt_structure_int_rename {σ : Type*} (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (f : idx → σ) (n : ℕ) :
witt_structure_int p (rename f Φ) n = rename (prod.map f id) (witt_structure_int p Φ n) :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.map_injective (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) int.cast_injective,
simp only [map_rename, map_witt_structure_int, witt_structure_rat, rename_bind₁, rename_rename,
bind₁_rename],
refl
end
@[simp]
lemma constant_coeff_witt_structure_rat_zero (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) :
constant_coeff (witt_structure_rat p Φ 0) = constant_coeff Φ :=
by simp only [witt_structure_rat, bind₁, map_aeval, X_in_terms_of_W_zero, constant_coeff_rename,
constant_coeff_witt_polynomial, aeval_X, constant_coeff_comp_algebra_map,
eval₂_hom_zero'_apply, ring_hom.id_apply]
lemma constant_coeff_witt_structure_rat (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ)
(h : constant_coeff Φ = 0) (n : ℕ) :
constant_coeff (witt_structure_rat p Φ n) = 0 :=
by simp only [witt_structure_rat, eval₂_hom_zero'_apply, h, bind₁, map_aeval, constant_coeff_rename,
constant_coeff_witt_polynomial, constant_coeff_comp_algebra_map, ring_hom.id_apply,
constant_coeff_X_in_terms_of_W]
@[simp]
lemma constant_coeff_witt_structure_int_zero (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) :
constant_coeff (witt_structure_int p Φ 0) = constant_coeff Φ :=
begin
have inj : function.injective (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ),
{ intros m n, exact int.cast_inj.mp, },
apply inj,
rw [← constant_coeff_map, map_witt_structure_int,
constant_coeff_witt_structure_rat_zero, constant_coeff_map],
end
lemma constant_coeff_witt_structure_int (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ)
(h : constant_coeff Φ = 0) (n : ℕ) :
constant_coeff (witt_structure_int p Φ n) = 0 :=
begin
have inj : function.injective (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ),
{ intros m n, exact int.cast_inj.mp, },
apply inj,
rw [← constant_coeff_map, map_witt_structure_int,
constant_coeff_witt_structure_rat, ring_hom.map_zero],
rw [constant_coeff_map, h, ring_hom.map_zero],
end
variable (R)
-- we could relax the fintype on `idx`, but then we need to cast from finset to set.
-- for our applications `idx` is always finite.
lemma witt_structure_rat_vars [fintype idx] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
(witt_structure_rat p Φ n).vars ⊆ finset.univ ×ˢ finset.range (n + 1) :=
begin
rw witt_structure_rat,
intros x hx,
simp only [finset.mem_product, true_and, finset.mem_univ, finset.mem_range],
obtain ⟨k, hk, hx'⟩ := mem_vars_bind₁ _ _ hx,
obtain ⟨i, -, hx''⟩ := mem_vars_bind₁ _ _ hx',
obtain ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ := mem_vars_rename _ _ hx'',
rw [witt_polynomial_vars, finset.mem_range] at hj,
replace hk := X_in_terms_of_W_vars_subset p _ hk,
rw finset.mem_range at hk,
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hj hk,
end
-- we could relax the fintype on `idx`, but then we need to cast from finset to set.
-- for our applications `idx` is always finite.
lemma witt_structure_int_vars [fintype idx] (Φ : mv_polynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) :
(witt_structure_int p Φ n).vars ⊆ finset.univ ×ˢ finset.range (n + 1) :=
begin
have : function.injective (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) := int.cast_injective,
rw [← vars_map_of_injective _ this, map_witt_structure_int],
apply witt_structure_rat_vars,
end
end p_prime
|
b260532170bf05e9ad23371c5ec9c5a624e8be79 | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/set_theory/ordinal_arithmetic.lean | 027cb61177c142d3ad24aa68afe3c533671bb946 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 70,407 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import set_theory.ordinal
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limit_rec_on`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We also define the power function and the logarithm function on ordinals, and discuss the properties
of casts of natural numbers of and of `omega` with respect to these operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `is_limit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limit_rec_on` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `is_normal`: a function `f : ordinal → ordinal` satisfies `is_normal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
* `nfp f a`: the next fixed point of a function `f` on ordinals, above `a`. It behaves well
for normal functions.
* `CNF b o` is the Cantor normal form of the ordinal `o` in base `b`.
* `sup`: the supremum of an indexed family of ordinals in `Type u`, as an ordinal in `Type u`.
* `bsup`: the supremum of a set of ordinals indexed by ordinals less than a given ordinal `o`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open function cardinal set equiv
open_locale classical cardinal
universes u v w
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
namespace ordinal
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp] theorem lift_add (a b) : lift (a + b) = lift a + lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨(rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
(rel_iso.sum_lex_congr (rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)
(rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_succ (a) : lift (succ a) = succ (lift a) :=
by unfold succ; simp only [lift_add, lift_one]
theorem add_le_add_iff_left (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b ≤ a + c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨induction_on a $ λ α r hr, induction_on b $ λ β₁ s₁ hs₁, induction_on c $ λ β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩, ⟨
have fl : ∀ a, f (sum.inl a) = sum.inl a := λ a,
by simpa only [initial_seg.trans_apply, initial_seg.le_add_apply]
using @initial_seg.eq _ _ _ _ (@sum.lex.is_well_order _ _ _ _ hr hs₂)
((initial_seg.le_add r s₁).trans f) (initial_seg.le_add r s₂) a,
have ∀ b, {b' // f (sum.inr b) = sum.inr b'}, begin
intro b, cases e : f (sum.inr b),
{ rw ← fl at e, have := f.inj' e, contradiction },
{ exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ }
end,
let g (b) := (this b).1 in
have fr : ∀ b, f (sum.inr b) = sum.inr (g b), from λ b, (this b).2,
⟨⟨⟨g, λ x y h, by injection f.inj'
(by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (sum.inr x) = f (sum.inr y))⟩,
λ a b, by simpa only [sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, rel_embedding.coe_fn_to_embedding,
initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding, function.embedding.coe_fn_mk]
using @rel_embedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.to_rel_embedding (sum.inr a) (sum.inr b)⟩,
λ a b H, begin
rcases f.init' (by rw fr; exact sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a'|a', h⟩,
{ rw fl at h, cases h },
{ rw fr at h, exact ⟨a', sum.inr.inj h⟩ }
end⟩⟩,
λ h, add_le_add_left h _⟩
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem succ_zero : succ 0 = 1 := zero_add _
theorem one_le_iff_pos {o : ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ 0 < o :=
by rw [← succ_zero, succ_le]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
by rw [one_le_iff_pos, ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem succ_pos (o : ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (ordinal.zero_le _) (lt_succ_self _)
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt $ succ_pos o
@[simp] theorem card_succ (o : ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 :=
by simp only [succ, card_add, card_one]
theorem nat_cast_succ (n : ℕ) : (succ n : ordinal) = n.succ := rfl
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem lt_succ {a b : ordinal} : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, succ_le, not_lt]
theorem add_lt_add_iff_left (a) {b c : ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c :=
by rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_right {a b c : ordinal} : a + b < c + b → a < c :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h, add_le_add_right h _)
@[simp] theorem succ_lt_succ {a b : ordinal} : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b :=
by rw [lt_succ, succ_le]
@[simp] theorem succ_le_succ {a b : ordinal} : succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 succ_lt_succ
theorem succ_inj {a b : ordinal} : succ a = succ b ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, succ_le_succ]
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b :=
by induction n with n ih; [rw [nat.cast_zero, add_zero, add_zero],
rw [← nat_cast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ, ih]]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
/-! ### The zero ordinal -/
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero {o} : card o = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
⟨induction_on o $ λ α r _ h, begin
refine le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt $
λ hn, ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 _ h) (ordinal.zero_le _),
rw [← succ_le, succ_zero] at hn, cases hn with f,
exact ⟨f punit.star⟩
end, λ e, by simp only [e, card_zero]⟩
@[simp] theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty [is_well_order α r] [is_empty α] : type r = 0 :=
card_eq_zero.symm.mpr eq_zero_of_is_empty
@[simp] theorem type_eq_zero_iff_is_empty [is_well_order α r] : type r = 0 ↔ is_empty α :=
(@card_eq_zero (type r)).symm.trans eq_zero_iff_is_empty
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [is_well_order α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ nonempty α :=
(not_congr (@card_eq_zero (type r))).symm.trans ne_zero_iff_nonempty
protected lemma one_ne_zero : (1 : ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 ⟨punit.star⟩
instance : nontrivial ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ordinal) < 1 :=
lt_iff_le_and_ne.2 ⟨ordinal.zero_le _, ne.symm $ ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then classical.some h else o
@[simp] theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o :=
by have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_inj.1 $ classical.some_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then let ⟨a, e⟩ := h in
by rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨λ e ⟨a, e'⟩, by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact ne_of_lt (lt_succ_self _) e,
λ h, dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨λ e, ⟨_, e.symm⟩, λ ⟨a, e⟩, by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o} (h : ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a) {b} : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨lt_trans (lt_succ_self _), λ l,
lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le.2 l) (λ e, h ⟨_, e.symm⟩)⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then let ⟨c, e⟩ := h in
by rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp] theorem lift_is_succ {o} : (∃ a, lift o = succ a) ↔ (∃ a, o = succ a) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, h⟩,
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down $ show a ≤ lift o, from le_of_lt $
h.symm ▸ lt_succ_self _ in
⟨b, lift_inj.1 $ by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨lift a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_pred (o) : lift (pred o) = pred (lift o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then
by cases h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h,
pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor. -/
def is_limit (o : ordinal) : Prop := o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
theorem not_zero_is_limit : ¬ is_limit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ := h rfl
theorem not_succ_is_limit (o) : ¬ is_limit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ := lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ_self _))
theorem not_succ_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ¬ ∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ := not_succ_is_limit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨lt_trans (lt_succ_self _), h.2 _⟩
theorem le_succ_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ succ_lt_of_is_limit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨λ h x l, le_trans (le_of_lt l) h,
λ H, (le_succ_of_is_limit h).1 $ le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ_self _)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x :=
by simpa only [not_ball, not_le] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp] theorem lift_is_limit (o) : is_limit (lift o) ↔ is_limit o :=
and_congr (not_congr $ by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨λ H a h, lift_lt.1 $ by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h),
λ H a h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h) in
by rw [← e, ← lift_succ, lift_lt];
rw [← e, lift_lt] at h; exact H a' h⟩
theorem is_limit.pos {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
theorem is_limit.one_lt {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : 1 < o :=
by simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
theorem is_limit.nat_lt {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) < o
| 0 := h.pos
| (n+1) := h.2 _ (is_limit.nat_lt n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : ordinal) :
o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ is_limit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then or.inl o0 else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then or.inr (or.inl h) else
or.inr $ or.inr ⟨o0, λ a, (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def limit_rec_on {C : ordinal → Sort*}
(o : ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, is_limit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
wf.fix (λ o IH,
if o0 : o = 0 then by rw o0; exact H₁ else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then
by rw ← succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h; exact
H₂ _ (IH _ $ pred_lt_iff_is_succ.2 h)
else H₃ _ ⟨o0, λ a, (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩ IH) o
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limit_rec_on C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
by rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq, dif_pos rfl]; refl
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limit_rec_on C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limit_rec_on C o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
begin
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩,
rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq,
dif_neg (succ_ne_zero o), dif_pos h],
generalize : limit_rec_on._proof_2 (succ o) h = h₂,
generalize : limit_rec_on._proof_3 (succ o) h = h₃,
revert h₂ h₃, generalize e : pred (succ o) = o', intros,
rw pred_succ at e, subst o', refl
end
@[simp] theorem limit_rec_on_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limit_rec_on C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h (λ x h, @limit_rec_on C x H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
by rw [limit_rec_on, well_founded.fix_eq,
dif_neg h.1, dif_neg (not_succ_of_is_limit h)]; refl
lemma has_succ_of_is_limit {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : is_well_order α r]
(h : (type r).is_limit) (x : α) : ∃y, r x y :=
begin
use enum r (typein r x).succ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)),
convert (enum_lt (typein_lt_type r x) _).mpr (lt_succ_self _), rw [enum_typein]
end
lemma type_subrel_lt (o : ordinal.{u}) :
type (subrel (<) {o' : ordinal | o' < o}) = ordinal.lift.{u u+1} o :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on o _,
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩, resetI, apply quotient.sound,
constructor, symmetry, refine (rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift r).trans (typein_iso r)
end
lemma mk_initial_seg (o : ordinal.{u}) :
#{o' : ordinal | o' < o} = cardinal.lift.{u u+1} o.card :=
by rw [lift_card, ←type_subrel_lt, card_type]
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def is_normal (f : ordinal → ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, is_limit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem is_normal.limit_le {f} (H : is_normal f) : ∀ {o}, is_limit o →
∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a := H.2
theorem is_normal.limit_lt {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} (h : is_limit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 $ by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem is_normal.lt_iff {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt $ λ a b,
limit_rec_on b (not.elim (not_lt_of_le $ ordinal.zero_le _))
(λ b IH h, (lt_or_eq_of_le (lt_succ.1 h)).elim
(λ h, lt_trans (IH h) (H.1 _))
(λ e, e ▸ H.1 _))
(λ b l IH h, lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a)
((H.2 _ l _).1 (le_refl _) _ (l.2 _ h)))
theorem is_normal.le_iff {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem is_normal.inj {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem is_normal.le_self {f} (H : is_normal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
limit_rec_on a (ordinal.zero_le _)
(λ a IH, succ_le.2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt IH (H.1 _))
(λ a l IH, (limit_le l).2 $ λ b h,
le_trans (IH b h) $ H.le_iff.2 $ le_of_lt h)
theorem is_normal.le_set {f} (H : is_normal f) (p : ordinal → Prop)
(p0 : ∃ x, p x) (S)
(H₂ : ∀ o, S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → a ≤ o) {o} :
f S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → f a ≤ o :=
⟨λ h a pa, le_trans (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 (le_refl _) _ pa)) h,
λ h, begin
revert H₂, apply limit_rec_on S,
{ intro H₂,
cases p0 with x px,
have := ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (ordinal.zero_le _) _ px),
rw this at px, exact h _ px },
{ intros S _ H₂,
rcases not_ball.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 $ not_le_of_lt $ lt_succ_self _) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact le_trans (H.le_iff.2 $ succ_le.2 $ not_le.1 h₂) (h _ h₁) },
{ intros S L _ H₂, apply (H.2 _ L _).2, intros a h',
rcases not_ball.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 (not_le.2 h')) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact le_trans (H.le_iff.2 $ le_of_lt $ not_le.1 h₂) (h _ h₁) }
end⟩
theorem is_normal.le_set' {f} (H : is_normal f) (p : α → Prop) (g : α → ordinal)
(p0 : ∃ x, p x) (S)
(H₂ : ∀ o, S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → g a ≤ o) {o} :
f S ≤ o ↔ ∀ a, p a → f (g a) ≤ o :=
(H.le_set (λ x, ∃ y, p y ∧ x = g y)
(let ⟨x, px⟩ := p0 in ⟨_, _, px, rfl⟩) _
(λ o, (H₂ o).trans ⟨λ H a ⟨y, h1, h2⟩, h2.symm ▸ H y h1,
λ H a h1, H (g a) ⟨a, h1, rfl⟩⟩)).trans
⟨λ H a h, H (g a) ⟨a, h, rfl⟩, λ H a ⟨y, h1, h2⟩, h2.symm ▸ H y h1⟩
theorem is_normal.refl : is_normal id :=
⟨λ x, lt_succ_self _, λ o l a, limit_le l⟩
theorem is_normal.trans {f g} (H₁ : is_normal f) (H₂ : is_normal g) :
is_normal (λ x, f (g x)) :=
⟨λ x, H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _),
λ o l a, H₁.le_set' (< o) g ⟨_, l.pos⟩ _ (λ c, H₂.2 _ l _)⟩
theorem is_normal.is_limit {f} (H : is_normal f) {o} (l : is_limit o) :
is_limit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt $ lt_of_le_of_lt (ordinal.zero_le _) $ H.lt_iff.2 l.pos,
λ a h, let ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h in
lt_of_le_of_lt (succ_le.2 h₂) (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h b' l, le_trans (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt l) _) h,
λ H, le_of_not_lt $
induction_on a (λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _ h H l, begin
resetI,
suffices : ∀ x : β, sum.lex r s (sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l),
{ cases enum _ _ l with x x,
{ cases this (enum s 0 h.pos) },
{ exact irrefl _ (this _) } },
intros x,
rw [← typein_lt_typein (sum.lex r s), typein_enum],
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x)),
rw [add_succ, succ_le] at this,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (type_le'.2
⟨rel_embedding.of_monotone (λ a, _) (λ a b, _)⟩) this,
{ rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩,
{ exact sum.inl a },
{ exact sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩ } },
{ rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩; rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩; cases h₁; cases h₂;
rintro ⟨⟩; constructor; assumption }
end) h H⟩
theorem add_is_normal (a : ordinal) : is_normal ((+) a) :=
⟨λ b, (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ_self _),
λ b l c, add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem add_is_limit (a) {b} : is_limit b → is_limit (a + b) :=
(add_is_normal a).is_limit
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals-/
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying
`b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
def sub (a b : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
omin {o | a ≤ b+o} ⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
instance : has_sub ordinal := ⟨sub⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
omin_mem {o | a ≤ b+o} _
theorem sub_le {a b c : ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨λ h, le_trans (le_add_sub a b) (add_le_add_left h _),
λ h, omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 $ le_refl _)
((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 $ le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 $ le_add_left _ _
theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
le_antisymm begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a-b) with e|⟨c,e⟩|l,
{ simp only [e, add_zero, h] },
{ rw [e, add_succ, succ_le, ← lt_sub, e], apply lt_succ_self },
{ exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 (λ c l, le_of_lt (lt_sub.1 l)) }
end (le_add_sub _ _)
@[simp] theorem sub_zero (a : ordinal) : a - 0 = a :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp] theorem zero_sub (a : ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 :=
by rw ← ordinal.le_zero; apply sub_le_self
@[simp] theorem sub_self (a : ordinal) : a - a = 0 :=
by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b,
λ h, by rwa [← ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
theorem sub_sub (a b c : ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d, by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c :=
by rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem sub_is_limit {a b} (l : is_limit a) (h : b < a) : is_limit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt $ lt_sub.2 $ by rwa add_zero,
λ c h, by rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
@[simp] theorem one_add_omega : 1 + omega.{u} = omega :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_add_left _ _),
rw [omega, one_eq_lift_type_unit, ← lift_add, lift_le, type_add],
have : is_well_order unit empty_relation := by apply_instance,
refine ⟨rel_embedding.collapse (rel_embedding.of_monotone _ _)⟩,
{ apply sum.rec, exact λ _, 0, exact nat.succ },
{ intros a b, cases a; cases b; intro H; cases H with _ _ H _ _ H;
[cases H, exact nat.succ_pos _, exact nat.succ_lt_succ H] }
end
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : omega ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
by rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals-/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance : monoid ordinal.{u} :=
{ mul := λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂ a b
(λ ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩, ⟦⟨β × α, prod.lex s r, by exactI prod.lex.is_well_order⟩⟧
: Well_order → Well_order → ordinal) $
λ ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩,
quot.sound ⟨rel_iso.prod_lex_congr g f⟩,
one := 1,
mul_assoc := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩,
eq.symm $ quotient.sound ⟨⟨prod_assoc _ _ _, λ a b, begin
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩,
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩,
simp [prod.lex_def, and_or_distrib_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]
end⟩⟩,
mul_one := λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _, quotient.sound
⟨⟨punit_prod _, λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩;
simp only [prod.lex_def, empty_relation, false_or];
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]; refl⟩⟩,
one_mul := λ a, induction_on a $ λ α r _, quotient.sound
⟨⟨prod_punit _, λ a b, by rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩;
simp only [prod.lex_def, empty_relation, and_false, or_false]; refl⟩⟩ }
@[simp] theorem type_mul {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
[is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s] : type r * type s = type (prod.lex s r) := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_mul (a b) : lift (a * b) = lift a * lift b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨(rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _).trans
(rel_iso.prod_lex_congr (rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)
(rel_iso.preimage equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
quotient.induction_on₂ a b $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩,
mul_comm (mk β) (mk α)
@[simp] theorem mul_zero (a : ordinal) : a * 0 = 0 :=
induction_on a $ λ α _ _, by exactI type_eq_zero_of_empty
@[simp] theorem zero_mul (a : ordinal) : 0 * a = 0 :=
induction_on a $ λ α _ _, by exactI type_eq_zero_of_empty
theorem mul_add (a b c : ordinal) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨⟨sum_prod_distrib _ _ _, begin
rintro ⟨a₁|a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁|b₁, b₂⟩; simp only [prod.lex_def,
sum.lex_inl_inl, sum.lex.sep, sum.lex_inr_inl, sum.lex_inr_inr,
sum_prod_distrib_apply_left, sum_prod_distrib_apply_right];
simp only [sum.inl.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]
end⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_add_one (a b : ordinal) : a * (b + 1) = a * b + a :=
by simp only [mul_add, mul_one]
@[simp] theorem mul_succ (a b : ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a := mul_add_one _ _
theorem mul_le_mul_left {a b} (c : ordinal) : a ≤ b → c * a ≤ c * b :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩, begin
resetI,
refine type_le'.2 ⟨rel_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (f a.1, a.2))
(λ a b h, _)⟩, clear_,
cases h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h',
{ exact prod.lex.left _ _ (f.to_rel_embedding.map_rel_iff.2 h') },
{ exact prod.lex.right _ h' }
end
theorem mul_le_mul_right {a b} (c : ordinal) : a ≤ b → a * c ≤ b * c :=
quotient.induction_on₃ a b c $ λ ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩, begin
resetI,
refine type_le'.2 ⟨rel_embedding.of_monotone
(λ a, (a.1, f a.2))
(λ a b h, _)⟩,
cases h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h',
{ exact prod.lex.left _ _ h' },
{ exact prod.lex.right _ (f.to_rel_embedding.map_rel_iff.2 h') }
end
theorem mul_le_mul {a b c d : ordinal} (h₁ : a ≤ c) (h₂ : b ≤ d) : a * b ≤ c * d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ h₂) (mul_le_mul_right _ h₁)
private lemma mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [is_well_order α r] [is_well_order β s]
{c} (h : is_limit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c)
(l : c < type r * type s) : false :=
begin
suffices : ∀ a b, prod.lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l),
{ cases enum _ _ l with b a, exact irrefl _ (this _ _) },
intros a b,
rw [← typein_lt_typein (prod.lex s r), typein_enum],
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b)),
rw [mul_succ] at this,
have := lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2
(typein_lt_type _ a)) this,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ this,
refine (type_le'.2 _),
constructor,
refine rel_embedding.of_monotone (λ a, _) (λ a b, _),
{ rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩,
by_cases e : b = b',
{ refine sum.inr ⟨a', _⟩,
subst e, cases h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact (irrefl _ h).elim },
{ exact h } },
{ refine sum.inl (⟨b', _⟩, a'),
cases h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact h }, { exact (e rfl).elim } } },
{ rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩,
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩,
intro h, by_cases e₁ : b = b₁; by_cases e₂ : b = b₂,
{ substs b₁ b₂,
simpa only [subrel_val, prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or, eq_self_iff_true,
dif_pos, sum.lex_inr_inr] using h },
{ subst b₁,
simp only [subrel_val, prod.lex_def, e₂, prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢,
cases h₂; [exact asymm h h₂_h, exact e₂ rfl] },
{ simp only [e₂, dif_pos, eq_self_iff_true, dif_neg e₁, not_false_iff, sum.lex.sep] },
{ simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, prod.lex_def, subrel_val, subtype.mk_eq_mk,
sum.lex_inl_inl] using h } }
end
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨λ h b' l, le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ (le_of_lt l)) h,
λ H, le_of_not_lt $ induction_on a (λ α r _, induction_on b $ λ β s _,
by exactI mul_le_of_limit_aux) h H⟩
theorem mul_is_normal {a : ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : is_normal ((*) a) :=
⟨λ b, by rw mul_succ; simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a*b)).2 h,
λ b l c, mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : ordinal.{u}}
(h : is_limit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' :=
by simpa only [not_ball, not_le] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : ordinal}
(h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b :=
by simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : ordinal}
(h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (λ h', mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_is_normal a0).inj
theorem mul_is_limit {a b : ordinal}
(a0 : 0 < a) : is_limit b → is_limit (a * b) :=
(mul_is_normal a0).is_limit
theorem mul_is_limit_left {a b : ordinal}
(l : is_limit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : is_limit (a * b) :=
begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with rfl|⟨b,rfl⟩|lb,
{ exact (lt_irrefl _).elim b0 },
{ rw mul_succ, exact add_is_limit _ l },
{ exact mul_is_limit l.pos lb }
end
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
protected lemma div_aux (a b : ordinal.{u}) (h : b ≠ 0) : set.nonempty {o | a < b * succ o} :=
⟨a, succ_le.1 $
by simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul]
using mul_le_mul_right (succ a) (succ_le.2 (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h))⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
protected def div (a b : ordinal.{u}) : ordinal.{u} :=
if h : b = 0 then 0 else omin {o | a < b * succ o} (ordinal.div_aux a b h)
instance : has_div ordinal := ⟨ordinal.div⟩
@[simp] theorem div_zero (a : ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 := dif_pos rfl
lemma div_def (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) :
a / b = omin {o | a < b * succ o} (ordinal.div_aux a b h) := dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) :=
by rw div_def a h; exact omin_mem {o | a < b * succ o} _
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b :=
by simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_mul_succ_div a b0) (mul_le_mul_left _ $ succ_le_succ.2 h),
λ h, by rw div_def a b0; exact omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, div_le c0, not_lt]
theorem le_div {a b c : ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) :
a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on a,
{ simp only [mul_zero, ordinal.zero_le] },
{ intros, rw [succ_le, lt_div c0] },
{ simp only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt} }
end
theorem div_lt {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) :
a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, ordinal.zero_le] else
(div_le b0).2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt h $
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ_self _) (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp] theorem zero_div (a : ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
ordinal.le_zero.1 $ div_le_of_le_mul $ ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 (le_refl _)
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply (div_le b0).2,
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left],
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0 },
{ rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left],
apply mul_div_le }
end
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 :=
begin
rw [← ordinal.le_zero, div_le $ ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt (ordinal.zero_le _) h],
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
end
@[simp] theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a :=
by simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
@[simp] theorem div_one (a : ordinal) : a / 1 = a :=
by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp] theorem div_self {a : ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 :=
by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self] else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ d,
by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem is_limit_add_iff {a b} : is_limit (a + b) ↔ is_limit b ∨ (b = 0 ∧ is_limit a) :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ by_cases h' : b = 0,
{ rw [h', add_zero] at h, right, exact ⟨h', h⟩ },
left, rw [←add_sub_cancel a b], apply sub_is_limit h,
suffices : a + 0 < a + b, simpa only [add_zero],
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] },
rcases h with h|⟨rfl, h⟩, exact add_is_limit a h, simpa only [add_zero]
end
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a _ c ⟨b, rfl⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨d, e⟩, ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩,
λ ⟨d, e⟩, by { rw [e, ← mul_add], apply dvd_mul_right }⟩
theorem dvd_add {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) : a ∣ c → a ∣ b + c :=
(dvd_add_iff h₁).2
theorem dvd_zero (a : ordinal) : a ∣ 0 := ⟨_, (mul_zero _).symm⟩
theorem zero_dvd {a : ordinal} : 0 ∣ a ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨λ ⟨h, e⟩, by simp only [e, zero_mul], λ e, e.symm ▸ dvd_zero _⟩
theorem one_dvd (a : ordinal) : 1 ∣ a := ⟨a, (one_mul _).symm⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a _ a0 ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a _ b0 ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_left a
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 (λ h : b = 0, by simpa only [h, mul_zero] using b0))
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (zero_dvd.1 h₁).symm else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact zero_dvd.1 h₂ else
le_antisymm (le_of_dvd b0 h₁) (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance : has_mod ordinal := ⟨λ a b, a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mod_zero (a : ordinal) : a % 0 = a :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp] theorem zero_mod (b : ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 :=
by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
add_sub_cancel_of_le $ mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 $
by rw div_add_mod; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp] theorem mod_self (a : ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod] else
by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp] theorem mod_one (a : ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 :=
by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
/-! ### Supremum of a family of ordinals -/
/-- The supremum of a family of ordinals -/
def sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ordinal :=
omin {c | ∀ i, f i ≤ c}
⟨(sup (cardinal.succ ∘ card ∘ f)).ord, λ i, le_of_lt $
cardinal.lt_ord.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (cardinal.lt_succ_self _) (le_sup _ _))⟩
theorem le_sup {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : ∀ i, f i ≤ sup f :=
omin_mem {c | ∀ i, f i ≤ c} _
theorem sup_le {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans (le_sup _ _) h, λ h, omin_le h⟩
theorem lt_sup {ι} {f : ι → ordinal} {a} : a < sup f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i :=
by simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@sup_le _ f a)
theorem is_normal.sup {f} (H : is_normal f)
{ι} {g : ι → ordinal} (h : nonempty ι) : f (sup g) = sup (f ∘ g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ a,
by rw [sup_le, comp, H.le_set' (λ_:ι, true) g (let ⟨i⟩ := h in ⟨i, ⟨⟩⟩)];
intros; simp only [sup_le, true_implies_iff]
theorem sup_ord {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : sup (λ i, (f i).ord) = (cardinal.sup f).ord :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ a, by simp only [sup_le, cardinal.ord_le, cardinal.sup_le]
lemma sup_succ {ι} (f : ι → ordinal) : sup (λ i, succ (f i)) ≤ succ (sup f) :=
by { rw [ordinal.sup_le], intro i, rw ordinal.succ_le_succ, apply ordinal.le_sup }
lemma unbounded_range_of_sup_ge {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f : β → α)
(h : type r ≤ sup.{u u} (typein r ∘ f)) : unbounded r (range f) :=
begin
apply (not_bounded_iff _).mp, rintro ⟨x, hx⟩, apply not_lt_of_ge h,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ (typein_lt_type r x), rw [sup_le], intro y,
apply le_of_lt, rw typein_lt_typein, apply hx, apply mem_range_self
end
/-- The supremum of a family of ordinals indexed by the set
of ordinals less than some `o : ordinal.{u}`.
(This is not a special case of `sup` over the subtype,
because `{a // a < o} : Type (u+1)` and `sup` only works over
families in `Type u`.) -/
def bsup (o : ordinal.{u}) : (Π a < o, ordinal.{max u v}) → ordinal.{max u v} :=
match o, o.out, o.out_eq with
| _, ⟨α, r, _⟩, rfl, f := by exactI sup (λ a, f (typein r a) (typein_lt_type _ _))
end
theorem bsup_le {o f a} : bsup.{u v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a :=
match o, o.out, o.out_eq, f :
∀ o w (e : ⟦w⟧ = o) (f : Π (a : ordinal.{u}), a < o → ordinal.{(max u v)}),
bsup._match_1 o w e f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a with
| _, ⟨α, r, _⟩, rfl, f := by rw [bsup._match_1, sup_le]; exactI
⟨λ H i h, by simpa only [typein_enum] using H (enum r i h), λ H b, H _ _⟩
end
theorem bsup_type (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] (f) :
bsup (type r) f = sup (λ a, f (typein r a) (typein_lt_type _ _)) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ o,
by rw [bsup_le, sup_le]; exact
⟨λ H b, H _ _, λ H i h, by simpa only [typein_enum] using H (enum r i h)⟩
theorem le_bsup {o} (f : Π a < o, ordinal) (i h) : f i h ≤ bsup o f :=
bsup_le.1 (le_refl _) _ _
theorem lt_bsup {o : ordinal} {f : Π a < o, ordinal}
(hf : ∀{a a'} (ha : a < o) (ha' : a' < o), a < a' → f a ha < f a' ha')
(ho : o.is_limit) (i h) : f i h < bsup o f :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (hf _ _ $ lt_succ_self i) (le_bsup f i.succ $ ho.2 _ h)
theorem bsup_id {o} (ho : is_limit o) : bsup.{u u} o (λ x _, x) = o :=
begin
apply le_antisymm, rw [bsup_le], intro i, apply le_of_lt,
rw [←not_lt], intro h, apply lt_irrefl (bsup.{u u} o (λ x _, x)),
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (lt_bsup _ ho _ h), refl, intros, assumption
end
theorem is_normal.bsup {f} (H : is_normal f)
{o : ordinal} : ∀ (g : Π a < o, ordinal) (h : o ≠ 0),
f (bsup o g) = bsup o (λ a h, f (g a h)) :=
induction_on o $ λ α r _ g h,
by resetI; rw [bsup_type,
H.sup (type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 h), bsup_type]
theorem is_normal.bsup_eq {f} (H : is_normal f) {o : ordinal} (h : is_limit o) :
bsup.{u} o (λx _, f x) = f o :=
by { rw [←is_normal.bsup.{u u} H (λ x _, x) h.1, bsup_id h] }
/-! ### Ordinal exponential -/
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion. -/
def power (a b : ordinal) : ordinal :=
if a = 0 then 1 - b else
limit_rec_on b 1 (λ _ IH, IH * a) (λ b _, bsup.{u u} b)
instance : has_pow ordinal ordinal := ⟨power⟩
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem zero_power' (a : ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a :=
by simp only [pow, power, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem zero_power {a : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^ a = 0 :=
by rwa [zero_power', sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp] theorem power_zero (a : ordinal) : a ^ 0 = 1 :=
by by_cases a = 0; [simp only [pow, power, if_pos h, sub_zero],
simp only [pow, power, if_neg h, limit_rec_on_zero]]
@[simp] theorem power_succ (a b : ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a :=
if h : a = 0 then by subst a; simp only [zero_power (succ_ne_zero _), mul_zero]
else by simp only [pow, power, limit_rec_on_succ, if_neg h]
theorem power_limit {a b : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : is_limit b) :
a ^ b = bsup.{u u} b (λ c _, a ^ c) :=
by simp only [pow, power, if_neg a0]; rw limit_rec_on_limit _ _ _ _ h; refl
theorem power_le_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : is_limit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c :=
by rw [power_limit a0 h, bsup_le]
theorem lt_power_of_limit {a b c : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : is_limit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' :=
by rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]; simp only [not_lt, power_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
@[simp] theorem power_one (a : ordinal) : a ^ 1 = a :=
by rw [← succ_zero, power_succ]; simp only [power_zero, one_mul]
@[simp] theorem one_power (a : ordinal) : 1 ^ a = 1 :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on a,
{ simp only [power_zero] },
{ intros _ ih, simp only [power_succ, ih, mul_one] },
refine λ b l IH, eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ c, _),
rw [power_le_of_limit ordinal.one_ne_zero l],
exact ⟨λ H, by simpa only [power_zero] using H 0 l.pos,
λ H b' h, by rwa IH _ h⟩,
end
theorem power_pos {a : ordinal} (b)
(a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b :=
begin
have h0 : 0 < a ^ 0, {simp only [power_zero, zero_lt_one]},
apply limit_rec_on b,
{ exact h0 },
{ intros b IH, rw [power_succ],
exact mul_pos IH a0 },
{ exact λ b l _, (lt_power_of_limit (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2
⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩ },
end
theorem power_ne_zero {a : ordinal} (b)
(a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 $ power_pos b $ ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
theorem power_is_normal {a : ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : is_normal ((^) a) :=
have a0 : 0 < a, from lt_trans zero_lt_one h,
⟨λ b, by simpa only [mul_one, power_succ] using
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left (power_pos b a0)).2 h,
λ b l c, power_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
theorem power_lt_power_iff_right {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(power_is_normal a1).lt_iff
theorem power_le_power_iff_right {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(power_is_normal a1).le_iff
theorem power_right_inj {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(power_is_normal a1).inj
theorem power_is_limit {a b : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : is_limit b → is_limit (a ^ b) :=
(power_is_normal a1).is_limit
theorem power_is_limit_left {a b : ordinal}
(l : is_limit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : is_limit (a ^ b) :=
begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with e|⟨b,rfl⟩|l',
{ exact absurd e hb },
{ rw power_succ,
exact mul_is_limit (power_pos _ l.pos) l },
{ exact power_is_limit l.one_lt l' }
end
theorem power_le_power_right {a b c : ordinal}
(h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ h₁,
{ exact (power_le_power_iff_right h₁).2 h₂ },
{ subst a, simp only [one_power] }
end
theorem power_le_power_left {a b : ordinal} (c)
(ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a, by_cases c0 : c = 0,
{ subst c, simp only [power_zero] },
{ simp only [zero_power c0, ordinal.zero_le] } },
{ apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [power_zero] },
{ intros c IH, simpa only [power_succ] using mul_le_mul IH ab },
{ exact λ c l IH, (power_le_of_limit a0 l).2
(λ b' h, le_trans (IH _ h) (power_le_power_right
(lt_of_lt_of_le (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) ab) (le_of_lt h))) } }
end
theorem le_power_self {a : ordinal} (b) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(power_is_normal a1).le_self _
theorem power_lt_power_left_of_succ {a b c : ordinal}
(ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c :=
by rw [power_succ, power_succ]; exact
lt_of_le_of_lt
(mul_le_mul_right _ $ power_le_power_left _ $ le_of_lt ab)
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (power_pos _ (lt_of_le_of_lt (ordinal.zero_le _) ab)))
theorem power_add (a b c : ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a,
by_cases c0 : c = 0, {simp only [c0, add_zero, power_zero, mul_one]},
have : b+c ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le
(ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0) (le_add_left _ _)),
simp only [zero_power c0, zero_power this, mul_zero] },
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1,
{ subst a1, simp only [one_power, mul_one] },
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [add_zero, power_zero, mul_one] },
{ intros c IH,
rw [add_succ, power_succ, IH, power_succ, mul_assoc] },
{ intros c l IH,
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ d, (((power_is_normal a1).trans
(add_is_normal b)).limit_le l).trans _),
simp only [IH] {contextual := tt},
exact (((mul_is_normal $ power_pos b (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(power_is_normal a1)).limit_le l).symm }
end
theorem power_dvd_power (a) {b c : ordinal}
(h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
by { rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h, power_add], apply dvd_mul_right }
theorem power_dvd_power_iff {a b c : ordinal}
(a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_le_of_lt ((power_lt_power_iff_right a1).2 hn) $
le_of_dvd (power_ne_zero _ $ one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 $ le_of_lt a1) h,
power_dvd_power _⟩
theorem power_mul (a b c : ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp only [b0, zero_mul, power_zero, one_power]},
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ subst a,
by_cases c0 : c = 0, {simp only [c0, mul_zero, power_zero]},
simp only [zero_power b0, zero_power c0, zero_power (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)] },
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1,
{ subst a1, simp only [one_power] },
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [mul_zero, power_zero] },
{ intros c IH,
rw [mul_succ, power_add, IH, power_succ] },
{ intros c l IH,
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ d, (((power_is_normal a1).trans
(mul_is_normal (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le l).trans _),
simp only [IH] {contextual := tt},
exact (power_le_of_limit (power_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm }
end
/-! ### Ordinal logarithm -/
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation
`x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and `w < b`. -/
def log (b : ordinal) (x : ordinal) : ordinal :=
if h : 1 < b then pred $
omin {o | x < b^o} ⟨succ x, succ_le.1 (le_power_self _ h)⟩
else 0
@[simp] theorem log_not_one_lt {b : ordinal} (b1 : ¬ 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b x = 0 :=
by simp only [log, dif_neg b1]
theorem log_def {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) : log b x =
pred (omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1)) :=
by simp only [log, dif_pos b1]
@[simp] theorem log_zero (b : ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 :=
if b1 : 1 < b then
by rw [log_def b1, ← ordinal.le_zero, pred_le];
apply omin_le; change 0<b^succ 0;
rw [succ_zero, power_one];
exact lt_trans zero_lt_one b1
else by simp only [log_not_one_lt b1]
theorem succ_log_def {b x : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) : succ (log b x) =
omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1) :=
begin
let t := omin {o | x < b^o} (log._proof_1 b x b1),
have : x < b ^ t := omin_mem {o | x < b^o} _,
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with h|h|h,
{ refine (not_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 x0) _).elim,
simpa only [h, power_zero] },
{ rw [show log b x = pred t, from log_def b1 x,
succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h] },
{ rcases (lt_power_of_limit (ne_of_gt $ lt_trans zero_lt_one b1) h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact (not_le_of_lt h₁).elim (le_omin.1 (le_refl t) a h₂) }
end
theorem lt_power_succ_log {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x : ordinal) :
x < b ^ succ (log b x) :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (ordinal.zero_le x) with x0 x0,
{ rw [succ_log_def b1 x0], exact omin_mem {o | x < b^o} _ },
{ subst x, apply power_pos _ (lt_trans zero_lt_one b1) }
end
theorem power_log_le (b) {x : ordinal} (x0 : 0 < x) :
b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0,
{ rw [b0, zero_power'],
refine le_trans (sub_le_self _ _) (one_le_iff_pos.2 x0) },
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with b1 b1,
{ refine le_of_not_lt (λ h, not_le_of_lt (lt_succ_self (log b x)) _),
have := @omin_le {o | x < b^o} _ _ h,
rwa ← succ_log_def b1 x0 at this },
{ rw [← b1, one_power], exact one_le_iff_pos.2 x0 }
end
theorem le_log {b x c : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) :
c ≤ log b x ↔ b ^ c ≤ x :=
⟨λ h, le_trans ((power_le_power_iff_right b1).2 h) (power_log_le b x0),
λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn,
not_le_of_lt (lt_power_succ_log b1 x) $
le_trans ((power_le_power_iff_right b1).2 (succ_le.2 hn)) h⟩
theorem log_lt {b x c : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (x0 : 0 < x) :
log b x < c ↔ x < b ^ c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_log b1 x0)
theorem log_le_log (b) {x y : ordinal} (xy : x ≤ y) :
log b x ≤ log b y :=
if x0 : x = 0 then by simp only [x0, log_zero, ordinal.zero_le] else
have x0 : 0 < x, from ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 x0,
if b1 : 1 < b then
(le_log b1 (lt_of_lt_of_le x0 xy)).2 $ le_trans (power_log_le _ x0) xy
else by simp only [log_not_one_lt b1, ordinal.zero_le]
theorem log_le_self (b x : ordinal) : log b x ≤ x :=
if x0 : x = 0 then by simp only [x0, log_zero, ordinal.zero_le] else
if b1 : 1 < b then
le_trans (le_power_self _ b1) (power_log_le b (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 x0))
else by simp only [log_not_one_lt b1, ordinal.zero_le]
/-! ### The Cantor normal form -/
theorem CNF_aux {b o : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
o % b ^ log b o < o :=
lt_of_lt_of_le
(mod_lt _ $ power_ne_zero _ b0)
(power_log_le _ $ ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 o0)
/-- Proving properties of ordinals by induction over their Cantor normal form. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] noncomputable def CNF_rec {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0)
{C : ordinal → Sort*}
(H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → o % b ^ log b o < o → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o)
: ∀ o, C o
| o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then by rw o0; exact H0 else
have _, from CNF_aux b0 o0,
H o o0 this (CNF_rec (o % b ^ log b o))
using_well_founded {dec_tac := `[assumption]}
@[simp] theorem CNF_rec_zero {b} (b0) {C H0 H} : @CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H 0 = H0 :=
by rw [CNF_rec, dif_pos rfl]; refl
@[simp] theorem CNF_rec_ne_zero {b} (b0) {C H0 H o} (o0) :
@CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H o = H o o0 (CNF_aux b0 o0) (@CNF_rec b b0 C H0 H _) :=
by rw [CNF_rec, dif_neg o0]
/-- The Cantor normal form of an ordinal is the list of coefficients
in the base-`b` expansion of `o`.
CNF b (b ^ u₁ * v₁ + b ^ u₂ * v₂) = [(u₁, v₁), (u₂, v₂)] -/
noncomputable def CNF (b := omega) (o : ordinal) : list (ordinal × ordinal) :=
if b0 : b = 0 then [] else
CNF_rec b0 [] (λ o o0 h IH, (log b o, o / b ^ log b o) :: IH) o
@[simp] theorem zero_CNF (o) : CNF 0 o = [] :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem CNF_zero (b) : CNF b 0 = [] :=
if b0 : b = 0 then dif_pos b0 else
(dif_neg b0).trans $ CNF_rec_zero _
theorem CNF_ne_zero {b o : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
CNF b o = (log b o, o / b ^ log b o) :: CNF b (o % b ^ log b o) :=
by unfold CNF; rw [dif_neg b0, dif_neg b0, CNF_rec_ne_zero b0 o0]
theorem one_CNF {o : ordinal} (o0 : o ≠ 0) :
CNF 1 o = [(0, o)] :=
by rw [CNF_ne_zero ordinal.one_ne_zero o0, log_not_one_lt (lt_irrefl _), power_zero, mod_one,
CNF_zero, div_one]
theorem CNF_foldr {b : ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (o) :
(CNF b o).foldr (λ p r, b ^ p.1 * p.2 + r) 0 = o :=
CNF_rec b0 (by rw CNF_zero; refl)
(λ o o0 h IH, by rw [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, list.foldr_cons, IH, div_add_mod]) o
theorem CNF_pairwise_aux (b := omega) (o) :
(∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.fst p ≤ log b o) ∧
(CNF b o).pairwise (λ p q, q.1 < p.1) :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0,
{ simp only [b0, zero_CNF, list.pairwise.nil, and_true], exact λ _, false.elim },
cases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with b1 b1,
{ refine CNF_rec b0 _ _ o,
{ simp only [CNF_zero, list.pairwise.nil, and_true], exact λ _, false.elim },
intros o o0 H IH, cases IH with IH₁ IH₂,
simp only [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, list.forall_mem_cons, list.pairwise_cons, IH₂, and_true],
refine ⟨⟨le_refl _, λ p m, _⟩, λ p m, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (IH₁ p m) (log_le_log _ $ le_of_lt H) },
{ refine lt_of_le_of_lt (IH₁ p m) ((log_lt b1 _).2 _),
{ rw ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero, intro e,
rw e at m, simpa only [CNF_zero] using m },
{ exact mod_lt _ (power_ne_zero _ b0) } } },
{ by_cases o0 : o = 0,
{ simp only [o0, CNF_zero, list.pairwise.nil, and_true], exact λ _, false.elim },
rw [← b1, one_CNF o0],
simp only [list.mem_singleton, log_not_one_lt (lt_irrefl _), forall_eq, le_refl, true_and,
list.pairwise_singleton] }
end
theorem CNF_pairwise (b := omega) (o) :
(CNF b o).pairwise (λ p q, prod.fst q < p.1) :=
(CNF_pairwise_aux _ _).2
theorem CNF_fst_le_log (b := omega) (o) :
∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.fst p ≤ log b o :=
(CNF_pairwise_aux _ _).1
theorem CNF_fst_le (b := omega) (o) (p ∈ CNF b o) : prod.fst p ≤ o :=
le_trans (CNF_fst_le_log _ _ p H) (log_le_self _ _)
theorem CNF_snd_lt {b : ordinal} (b1 : 1 < b) (o) :
∀ p ∈ CNF b o, prod.snd p < b :=
begin
have b0 := ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one b1),
refine CNF_rec b0 (λ _, by rw [CNF_zero]; exact false.elim) _ o,
intros o o0 H IH,
simp only [CNF_ne_zero b0 o0, list.mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, iff_true_intro IH, and_true],
rw [div_lt (power_ne_zero _ b0), ← power_succ],
exact lt_power_succ_log b1 _,
end
theorem CNF_sorted (b := omega) (o) :
((CNF b o).map prod.fst).sorted (>) :=
by rw [list.sorted, list.pairwise_map]; exact CNF_pairwise b o
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_mul {m n : ℕ} : ((m * n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m * n :=
by induction n with n IH; [simp only [nat.cast_zero, nat.mul_zero, mul_zero],
rw [nat.mul_succ, nat.cast_add, IH, nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_power {m n : ℕ} : ((pow m n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m ^ n :=
by induction n with n IH; [simp only [pow_zero, nat.cast_zero, power_zero, nat.cast_one],
rw [pow_succ', nat_cast_mul, IH, nat.cast_succ, ← succ_eq_add_one, power_succ]]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_le {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw [← cardinal.ord_nat, ← cardinal.ord_nat,
cardinal.ord_le_ord, cardinal.nat_cast_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_lt {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
by simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, nat_cast_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : ordinal) = n ↔ m = n :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, nat_cast_le]
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ordinal) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
@nat_cast_inj n 0
theorem nat_cast_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ordinal) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr nat_cast_eq_zero
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_pos {n : ℕ} : (0 : ordinal) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
@nat_cast_lt 0 n
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_sub {m n : ℕ} : ((m - n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m - n :=
(_root_.le_total m n).elim
(λ h, by rw [nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (nat_cast_le.2 h)]; refl)
(λ h, (add_left_cancel n).1 $ by rw [← nat.cast_add,
nat.add_sub_cancel' h, add_sub_cancel_of_le (nat_cast_le.2 h)])
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_div {m n : ℕ} : ((m / n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m / n :=
if n0 : n = 0 then by simp only [n0, nat.div_zero, nat.cast_zero, div_zero] else
have n0':_, from nat_cast_ne_zero.2 n0,
le_antisymm
(by rw [le_div n0', ← nat_cast_mul, nat_cast_le, mul_comm];
apply nat.div_mul_le_self)
(by rw [div_le n0', succ, ← nat.cast_succ, ← nat_cast_mul,
nat_cast_lt, mul_comm, ← nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0)];
apply nat.lt_succ_self)
@[simp] theorem nat_cast_mod {m n : ℕ} : ((m % n : ℕ) : ordinal) = m % n :=
by rw [← add_left_cancel (n*(m/n)), div_add_mod, ← nat_cast_div, ← nat_cast_mul, ← nat.cast_add,
nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp] theorem nat_le_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : cardinal) ≤ card o ↔ (n : ordinal) ≤ o :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [← cardinal.ord_le, cardinal.ord_nat] at h,
λ h, card_nat n ▸ card_le_card h⟩
@[simp] theorem nat_lt_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : cardinal) < card o ↔ (n : ordinal) < o :=
by rw [← succ_le, ← cardinal.succ_le, ← cardinal.nat_succ, nat_le_card]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_lt_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o < n ↔ o < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le nat_le_card
@[simp] theorem card_le_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o ≤ n ↔ o ≤ n :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 nat_lt_card
@[simp] theorem card_eq_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o = n ↔ o = n :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, card_le_nat, nat_le_card]
@[simp] theorem type_fin (n : ℕ) : @type (fin n) (<) _ = n :=
by rw [← card_eq_nat, card_type, mk_fin]
@[simp] theorem lift_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : lift n = n :=
by induction n with n ih; [simp only [nat.cast_zero, lift_zero],
simp only [nat.cast_succ, lift_add, ih, lift_one]]
theorem lift_type_fin (n : ℕ) : lift (@type (fin n) (<) _) = n :=
by simp only [type_fin, lift_nat_cast]
theorem fintype_card (r : α → α → Prop) [is_well_order α r] [fintype α] : type r = fintype.card α :=
by rw [← card_eq_nat, card_type, fintype_card]
end ordinal
/-! ### Properties of `omega` -/
namespace cardinal
open ordinal
@[simp] theorem ord_omega : ord.{u} omega = ordinal.omega :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 $ le_refl _) $
le_of_forall_lt $ λ o h, begin
rcases ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨o, rfl, h'⟩,
rw [lt_ord, ← lift_card, ← lift_omega.{0 u},
lift_lt, ← typein_enum (<) h'],
exact lt_omega_iff_fintype.2 ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
end
@[simp] theorem add_one_of_omega_le {c} (h : omega ≤ c) : c + 1 = c :=
by rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one,
← card_add, one_add_of_omega_le];
rwa [← ord_omega, ord_le_ord]
end cardinal
namespace ordinal
theorem lt_omega {o : ordinal.{u}} : o < omega ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n :=
by rw [← cardinal.ord_omega, cardinal.lt_ord, lt_omega]; simp only [card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega (n : ℕ) : (n : ordinal) < omega :=
lt_omega.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem omega_pos : 0 < omega := nat_lt_omega 0
theorem omega_ne_zero : omega ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt omega_pos
theorem one_lt_omega : 1 < omega := by simpa only [nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega 1
theorem omega_is_limit : is_limit omega :=
⟨omega_ne_zero, λ o h,
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega.1 h in
by rw [e]; exact nat_lt_omega (n+1)⟩
theorem omega_le {o : ordinal.{u}} : omega ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) ≤ o :=
⟨λ h n, le_trans (le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) h,
λ H, le_of_forall_lt $ λ a h,
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega.1 h in
by rw [e, ← succ_le]; exact H (n+1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ordinal) < o
| 0 := lt_of_le_of_ne (ordinal.zero_le o) h.1.symm
| (n+1) := h.2 _ (nat_lt_limit n)
theorem omega_le_of_is_limit {o} (h : is_limit o) : omega ≤ o :=
omega_le.2 $ λ n, le_of_lt $ nat_lt_limit h n
theorem add_omega {a : ordinal} (h : a < omega) : a + omega = omega :=
begin
rcases lt_omega.1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
clear h, induction n with n IH,
{ rw [nat.cast_zero, zero_add] },
{ rw [nat.cast_succ, add_assoc, one_add_of_omega_le (le_refl _), IH] }
end
theorem add_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a + b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem mul_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a * b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat_cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem is_limit_iff_omega_dvd {a : ordinal} : is_limit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ omega ∣ a :=
begin
refine ⟨λ l, ⟨l.1, ⟨a / omega, le_antisymm _ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, λ h, _⟩,
{ refine (limit_le l).2 (λ x hx, le_of_lt _),
rw [← div_lt omega_ne_zero, ← succ_le, le_div omega_ne_zero,
mul_succ, add_le_of_limit omega_is_limit],
intros b hb,
rcases lt_omega.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact le_trans (add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _)
(le_of_lt $ lt_sub.1 $ nat_lt_limit (sub_is_limit l hx) _) },
{ rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩,
refine mul_is_limit_left omega_is_limit
(ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ mt _ a0),
intro e, simp only [e, mul_zero] }
end
local infixr ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem power_lt_omega {a b : ordinal} (ha : a < omega) (hb : b < omega) : a ^ b < omega :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat_cast_power]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
theorem add_omega_power {a b : ordinal} (h : a < omega ^ b) : a + omega ^ b = omega ^ b :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_add_left _ _),
revert h, apply limit_rec_on b,
{ intro h, rw [power_zero, ← succ_zero, lt_succ, ordinal.le_zero] at h,
rw [h, zero_add] },
{ intros b _ h, rw [power_succ] at h,
rcases (lt_mul_of_limit omega_is_limit).1 h with ⟨x, xo, ax⟩,
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right (le_of_lt ax) _) _,
rw [power_succ, ← mul_add, add_omega xo] },
{ intros b l IH h, rcases (lt_power_of_limit omega_ne_zero l).1 h with ⟨x, xb, ax⟩,
refine (((add_is_normal a).trans (power_is_normal one_lt_omega))
.limit_le l).2 (λ y yb, _),
let z := max x y,
have := IH z (max_lt xb yb)
(lt_of_lt_of_le ax $ power_le_power_right omega_pos (le_max_left _ _)),
exact le_trans (add_le_add_left (power_le_power_right omega_pos (le_max_right _ _)) _)
(le_trans this (power_le_power_right omega_pos $ le_of_lt $ max_lt xb yb)) }
end
theorem add_lt_omega_power {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a < omega ^ c) (h₂ : b < omega ^ c) :
a + b < omega ^ c :=
by rwa [← add_omega_power h₁, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem add_absorp {a b c : ordinal} (h₁ : a < omega ^ b) (h₂ : omega ^ b ≤ c) : a + c = c :=
by rw [← add_sub_cancel_of_le h₂, ← add_assoc, add_omega_power h₁]
theorem add_absorp_iff {o : ordinal} (o0 : 0 < o) : (∀ a < o, a + o = o) ↔ ∃ a, o = omega ^ a :=
⟨λ H, ⟨log omega o, begin
refine ((lt_or_eq_of_le (power_log_le _ o0))
.resolve_left $ λ h, _).symm,
have := H _ h,
have := lt_power_succ_log one_lt_omega o,
rw [power_succ, lt_mul_of_limit omega_is_limit] at this,
rcases this with ⟨a, ao, h'⟩,
rcases lt_omega.1 ao with ⟨n, rfl⟩, clear ao,
revert h', apply not_lt_of_le,
suffices e : omega ^ log omega o * ↑n + o = o,
{ simpa only [e] using le_add_right (omega ^ log omega o * ↑n) o },
induction n with n IH, {simp only [nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_add]},
simp only [nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one, add_assoc, this, IH]
end⟩,
λ ⟨b, e⟩, e.symm ▸ λ a, add_omega_power⟩
theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : ordinal} (ba : b + a = a)
(l : is_limit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) :
(a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 $ λ c' h, begin
apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ (le_of_lt $ lt_succ_self _)),
rw IH _ h,
apply le_trans (add_le_add_left _ _),
{ rw ← mul_succ, exact mul_le_mul_left _ (succ_le.2 $ l.2 _ h) },
{ rw ← ba, exact le_add_right _ _ }
end)
(mul_le_mul_right _ (le_add_right _ _))
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) :
(a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on c,
{ simp only [succ_zero, mul_one] },
{ intros c IH,
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ] },
{ intros c l IH,
have := add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH,
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc] }
end
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : ordinal} (ba : b + a = a)
(l : is_limit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l (λ c' _, add_mul_succ c' ba)
theorem mul_omega {a : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) (ha : a < omega) : a * omega = omega :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit omega_is_limit).2 $ λ b hb, le_of_lt (mul_lt_omega ha hb))
(by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_le_mul_right omega (one_le_iff_pos.2 a0))
theorem mul_lt_omega_power {a b c : ordinal}
(c0 : 0 < c) (ha : a < omega ^ c) (hb : b < omega) : a * b < omega ^ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, mul_zero, power_pos _ omega_pos] else begin
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit c with rfl|⟨c,rfl⟩|l,
{ exact (lt_irrefl _).elim c0 },
{ rw power_succ at ha,
rcases ((mul_is_normal $ power_pos _ omega_pos).limit_lt
omega_is_limit).1 ha with ⟨n, hn, an⟩,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_lt an)) _,
rw [power_succ, mul_assoc, mul_lt_mul_iff_left (power_pos _ omega_pos)],
exact mul_lt_omega hn hb },
{ rcases ((power_is_normal one_lt_omega).limit_lt l).1 ha with ⟨x, hx, ax⟩,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul (le_of_lt ax) (le_of_lt hb)) _,
rw [← power_succ, power_lt_power_iff_right one_lt_omega],
exact l.2 _ hx }
end
theorem mul_omega_dvd {a : ordinal}
(a0 : 0 < a) (ha : a < omega) : ∀ {b}, omega ∣ b → a * b = b
| _ ⟨b, rfl⟩ := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_omega a0 ha]
theorem mul_omega_power_power {a b : ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) (h : a < omega ^ omega ^ b) :
a * omega ^ omega ^ b = omega ^ omega ^ b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {rw [b0, power_zero, power_one] at h ⊢, exact mul_omega a0 h},
refine le_antisymm _
(by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_le_mul_right (omega^omega^b) (one_le_iff_pos.2 a0)),
rcases (lt_power_of_limit omega_ne_zero (power_is_limit_left omega_is_limit b0)).1 h
with ⟨x, xb, ax⟩,
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_lt ax)) _,
rw [← power_add, add_omega_power xb]
end
theorem power_omega {a : ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) (h : a < omega) : a ^ omega = omega :=
le_antisymm
((power_le_of_limit (one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 $ le_of_lt a1) omega_is_limit).2
(λ b hb, le_of_lt (power_lt_omega h hb)))
(le_power_self _ a1)
/-! ### Fixed points of normal functions -/
/-- The next fixed point function, the least fixed point of the
normal function `f` above `a`. -/
def nfp (f : ordinal → ordinal) (a : ordinal) :=
sup (λ n : ℕ, f^[n] a)
theorem iterate_le_nfp (f a n) : f^[n] a ≤ nfp f a :=
le_sup _ n
theorem le_nfp_self (f a) : a ≤ nfp f a :=
iterate_le_nfp f a 0
theorem is_normal.lt_nfp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
f b < nfp f a ↔ b < nfp f a :=
lt_sup.trans $ iff.trans
(by exact
⟨λ ⟨n, h⟩, ⟨n, lt_of_le_of_lt (H.le_self _) h⟩,
λ ⟨n, h⟩, ⟨n+1, by rw iterate_succ'; exact H.lt_iff.2 h⟩⟩)
lt_sup.symm
theorem is_normal.nfp_le {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
nfp f a ≤ f b ↔ nfp f a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_nfp
theorem is_normal.nfp_le_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b}
(ab : a ≤ b) (h : f b ≤ b) : nfp f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.2 $ λ i, begin
induction i with i IH generalizing a, {exact ab},
exact IH (le_trans (H.le_iff.2 ab) h),
end
theorem is_normal.nfp_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) (a) : f (nfp f a) = nfp f a :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (H.le_self _),
cases le_or_lt (f a) a with aa aa,
{ rwa le_antisymm (H.nfp_le_fp (le_refl _) aa) (le_nfp_self _ _) },
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (nfp f a) with e|⟨b, e⟩|l,
{ refine @le_trans _ _ _ (f a) _ (H.le_iff.2 _) (iterate_le_nfp f a 1),
simp only [e, ordinal.zero_le] },
{ have : f b < nfp f a := H.lt_nfp.2 (by simp only [e, lt_succ_self]),
rw [e, lt_succ] at this,
have ab : a ≤ b,
{ rw [← lt_succ, ← e],
exact lt_of_lt_of_le aa (iterate_le_nfp f a 1) },
refine le_trans (H.le_iff.2 (H.nfp_le_fp ab this))
(le_trans this (le_of_lt _)),
simp only [e, lt_succ_self] },
{ exact (H.2 _ l _).2 (λ b h, le_of_lt (H.lt_nfp.2 h)) }
end
theorem is_normal.le_nfp {f} (H : is_normal f) {a b} :
f b ≤ nfp f a ↔ b ≤ nfp f a :=
⟨le_trans (H.le_self _), λ h,
by simpa only [H.nfp_fp] using H.le_iff.2 h⟩
theorem nfp_eq_self {f : ordinal → ordinal} {a} (h : f a = a) : nfp f a = a :=
le_antisymm (sup_le.mpr $ λ i, by rw [iterate_fixed h]) (le_nfp_self f a)
/-- The derivative of a normal function `f` is
the sequence of fixed points of `f`. -/
def deriv (f : ordinal → ordinal) (o : ordinal) : ordinal :=
limit_rec_on o (nfp f 0)
(λ a IH, nfp f (succ IH))
(λ a l, bsup.{u u} a)
@[simp] theorem deriv_zero (f) : deriv f 0 = nfp f 0 := limit_rec_on_zero _ _ _
@[simp] theorem deriv_succ (f o) : deriv f (succ o) = nfp f (succ (deriv f o)) :=
limit_rec_on_succ _ _ _ _
theorem deriv_limit (f) {o} : is_limit o →
deriv f o = bsup.{u u} o (λ a _, deriv f a) :=
limit_rec_on_limit _ _ _ _
theorem deriv_is_normal (f) : is_normal (deriv f) :=
⟨λ o, by rw [deriv_succ, ← succ_le]; apply le_nfp_self,
λ o l a, by rw [deriv_limit _ l, bsup_le]⟩
theorem is_normal.deriv_fp {f} (H : is_normal f) (o) : f (deriv.{u} f o) = deriv f o :=
begin
apply limit_rec_on o,
{ rw [deriv_zero, H.nfp_fp] },
{ intros o ih, rw [deriv_succ, H.nfp_fp] },
intros o l IH,
rw [deriv_limit _ l, is_normal.bsup.{u u u} H _ l.1],
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff (λ c, _),
simp only [bsup_le, IH] {contextual:=tt}
end
theorem is_normal.fp_iff_deriv {f} (H : is_normal f)
{a} : f a ≤ a ↔ ∃ o, a = deriv f o :=
⟨λ ha, begin
suffices : ∀ o (_:a ≤ deriv f o), ∃ o, a = deriv f o,
from this a ((deriv_is_normal _).le_self _),
intro o, apply limit_rec_on o,
{ intros h₁,
refine ⟨0, le_antisymm h₁ _⟩,
rw deriv_zero,
exact H.nfp_le_fp (ordinal.zero_le _) ha },
{ intros o IH h₁,
cases le_or_lt a (deriv f o), {exact IH h},
refine ⟨succ o, le_antisymm h₁ _⟩,
rw deriv_succ,
exact H.nfp_le_fp (succ_le.2 h) ha },
{ intros o l IH h₁,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁, {exact ⟨_, h⟩},
rw [deriv_limit _ l, ← not_le, bsup_le, not_ball] at h,
exact let ⟨o', h, hl⟩ := h in IH o' h (le_of_not_le hl) }
end, λ ⟨o, e⟩, e.symm ▸ le_of_eq (H.deriv_fp _)⟩
end ordinal
|
2038587dd7d3dc92ecc91221f129c67bc6acd933 | 0d2e44896897eda703992595d71a0b19ed30b8a1 | /uexp/src/uexp/rules/pullAggregateThroughUnion.lean | c5eb9e078a4f2158727c06906e4aa094e38f4e47 | [
"BSD-2-Clause"
] | permissive | wwombat/Cosette | a87312aabefdb53ea8b67c37731bd58c7485afb6 | 4c5dc6172e24d3546c9818ac1fad06f72fe1c991 | refs/heads/master | 1,619,479,568,051 | 1,520,292,502,000 | 1,520,292,502,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,942 | lean | import ..sql
import ..tactics
import ..u_semiring
import ..extra_constants
open Expr
open Proj
open Pred
open SQL
open tree
notation `int` := datatypes.int
theorem rule:
forall ( Γ scm_t scm_account scm_bonus scm_dept scm_emp: Schema) (rel_t: relation scm_t) (rel_account: relation scm_account) (rel_bonus: relation scm_bonus) (rel_dept: relation scm_dept) (rel_emp: relation scm_emp) (t_k0 : Column int scm_t) (t_c1 : Column int scm_t) (t_f1_a0 : Column int scm_t) (t_f2_a0 : Column int scm_t) (t_f0_c0 : Column int scm_t) (t_f1_c0 : Column int scm_t) (t_f0_c1 : Column int scm_t) (t_f1_c2 : Column int scm_t) (t_f2_c3 : Column int scm_t) (account_acctno : Column int scm_account) (account_type : Column int scm_account) (account_balance : Column int scm_account) (bonus_ename : Column int scm_bonus) (bonus_job : Column int scm_bonus) (bonus_sal : Column int scm_bonus) (bonus_comm : Column int scm_bonus) (dept_deptno : Column int scm_dept) (dept_name : Column int scm_dept) (emp_empno : Column int scm_emp) (emp_ename : Column int scm_emp) (emp_job : Column int scm_emp) (emp_mgr : Column int scm_emp) (emp_hiredate : Column int scm_emp) (emp_comm : Column int scm_emp) (emp_sal : Column int scm_emp) (emp_deptno : Column int scm_emp) (emp_slacker : Column int scm_emp),
denoteSQL (DISTINCT (SELECT1 (combine (right⋅left) (right⋅right)) FROM1 ((DISTINCT (SELECT1 (combine (right⋅emp_deptno) (right⋅emp_job)) FROM1 (table rel_emp) )) UNION ALL (DISTINCT (SELECT1 (combine (right⋅emp_deptno) (right⋅emp_job)) FROM1 (table rel_emp) ))) ) :SQL Γ _ ) =
denoteSQL (DISTINCT (SELECT1 (combine (right⋅left) (right⋅right)) FROM1 (((SELECT1 (combine (right⋅emp_deptno) (right⋅emp_job)) FROM1 (table rel_emp) )) UNION ALL ((SELECT1 (combine (right⋅emp_deptno) (right⋅emp_job)) FROM1 (table rel_emp) ))) ) : SQL Γ _ ) :=
begin
intros,
unfold_all_denotations,
funext,
simp,
sorry
end |
3c1cc885c8616b40ee32ef85611e9f029b9a779e | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/data/nat/choose/default.lean | c8003fa521f644a15fce5abcec9613106167978c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 82 | lean | import data.nat.choose.dvd
import data.nat.choose.cast
import data.nat.choose.sum
|
3ded3a3c579ed78182dcfe8be45c96deaf57a100 | 46125763b4dbf50619e8846a1371029346f4c3db | /src/topology/instances/ennreal.lean | 04b9c8fed2eb50c97628dc57418eaa8dbcd23b18 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | thjread/mathlib | a9d97612cedc2c3101060737233df15abcdb9eb1 | 7cffe2520a5518bba19227a107078d83fa725ddc | refs/heads/master | 1,615,637,696,376 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 246,680,271 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,583,960,875,000 | 1,583,960,875,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,900 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl
Extended non-negative reals
-/
import topology.instances.nnreal data.real.ennreal
noncomputable theory
open classical set lattice filter metric
open_locale classical
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
open_locale ennreal
namespace ennreal
variables {a b c d : ennreal} {r p q : nnreal}
variables {x y z : ennreal} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ennreal} {s : set ennreal}
section topological_space
open topological_space
/-- Topology on `ennreal`.
Note: this is different from the `emetric_space` topology. The `emetric_space` topology has
`is_open {⊤}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : topological_space ennreal :=
topological_space.generate_from {s | ∃a, s = {b | a < b} ∨ s = {b | b < a}}
instance : order_topology ennreal := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : t2_space ennreal := by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance : second_countable_topology ennreal :=
⟨⟨⋃q ≥ (0:ℚ), {{a : ennreal | a < nnreal.of_real q}, {a : ennreal | ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < a}},
countable_bUnion (countable_encodable _) $ assume a ha, countable_insert (countable_singleton _),
le_antisymm
(le_generate_from $ by simp [or_imp_distrib, is_open_lt', is_open_gt'] {contextual := tt})
(le_generate_from $ λ s h, begin
rcases h with ⟨a, hs | hs⟩;
[ rw show s = ⋃q∈{q:ℚ | 0 ≤ q ∧ a < nnreal.of_real q}, {b | ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < b},
from set.ext (assume b, by simp [hs, @ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn a b, and_assoc]),
rw show s = ⋃q∈{q:ℚ | 0 ≤ q ∧ ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < a}, {b | b < ↑(nnreal.of_real q)},
from set.ext (assume b, by simp [hs, @ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn b a, and_comm, and_assoc])];
{ apply is_open_Union, intro q,
apply is_open_Union, intro hq,
exact generate_open.basic _ (mem_bUnion hq.1 $ by simp) }
end)⟩⟩
lemma embedding_coe : embedding (coe : nnreal → ennreal) :=
⟨⟨begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ rw [order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals ennreal,
← coinduced_le_iff_le_induced],
refine le_generate_from (assume s ha, _),
rcases ha with ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩,
show is_open {b : nnreal | a < ↑b},
{ cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, is_open_lt'] },
show is_open {b : nnreal | ↑b < a},
{ cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, is_open_gt', is_open_const] } },
{ rw [order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals nnreal],
refine le_generate_from (assume s ha, _),
rcases ha with ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩,
exact ⟨Ioi a, is_open_Ioi, by simp [Ioi]⟩,
exact ⟨Iio a, is_open_Iio, by simp [Iio]⟩ }
end⟩,
assume a b, coe_eq_coe.1⟩
lemma is_open_ne_top : is_open {a : ennreal | a ≠ ⊤} :=
is_open_neg (is_closed_eq continuous_id continuous_const)
lemma is_open_Ico_zero : is_open (Ico 0 b) := by { rw ennreal.Ico_eq_Iio, exact is_open_Iio}
lemma coe_range_mem_nhds : range (coe : nnreal → ennreal) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ennreal) :=
have {a : ennreal | a ≠ ⊤} = range (coe : nnreal → ennreal),
from set.ext $ assume a, by cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe],
this ▸ mem_nhds_sets is_open_ne_top coe_ne_top
@[elim_cast] lemma tendsto_coe {f : filter α} {m : α → nnreal} {a : nnreal} :
tendsto (λa, (m a : ennreal)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
lemma continuous_coe {α} [topological_space α] {f : α → nnreal} :
continuous (λa, (f a : ennreal)) ↔ continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
lemma nhds_coe {r : nnreal} : 𝓝 (r : ennreal) = (𝓝 r).map coe :=
by rw [embedding_coe.induced, map_nhds_induced_eq coe_range_mem_nhds]
lemma nhds_coe_coe {r p : nnreal} : 𝓝 ((r : ennreal), (p : ennreal)) =
(𝓝 (r, p)).map (λp:nnreal×nnreal, (p.1, p.2)) :=
begin
rw [(embedding_coe.prod_mk embedding_coe).map_nhds_eq],
rw [← prod_range_range_eq],
exact prod_mem_nhds_sets coe_range_mem_nhds coe_range_mem_nhds
end
lemma continuous_of_real : continuous ennreal.of_real :=
(continuous_coe.2 continuous_id).comp nnreal.continuous_of_real
lemma tendsto_of_real {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λa, ennreal.of_real (m a)) f (𝓝 (ennreal.of_real a)) :=
tendsto.comp (continuous.tendsto continuous_of_real _) h
lemma tendsto_to_nnreal {a : ennreal} : a ≠ ⊤ →
tendsto (ennreal.to_nnreal) (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.to_nnreal) :=
begin
cases a; simp [some_eq_coe, none_eq_top, nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
exact tendsto_id
end
lemma tendsto_to_real {a : ennreal} : a ≠ ⊤ → tendsto (ennreal.to_real) (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.to_real) :=
λ ha, tendsto.comp ((@nnreal.tendsto_coe _ (𝓝 a.to_nnreal) id (a.to_nnreal)).2 tendsto_id)
(tendsto_to_nnreal ha)
lemma tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ennreal} {f : filter α}
(h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) : tendsto m f (𝓝 ⊤) :=
tendsto_nhds_generate_from $ assume s hs,
match s, hs with
| _, ⟨none, or.inl rfl⟩, hr := (lt_irrefl ⊤ hr).elim
| _, ⟨some r, or.inl rfl⟩, hr :=
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := exists_nat_gt r in
mem_sets_of_superset (h n) $ assume a hnma, show ↑r < m a, from
lt_trans (show (r : ennreal) < n, from (coe_nat n) ▸ coe_lt_coe.2 hrn) hnma
| _, ⟨a, or.inr rfl⟩, hr := (not_top_lt $ show ⊤ < a, from hr).elim
end
lemma tendsto_nat_nhds_top : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, ↑n) at_top (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top $ λ n, mem_at_top_sets.2
⟨n+1, λ m hm, ennreal.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.2 $ nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
lemma nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅a ≠ ∞, principal (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans $ by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
lemma nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ennreal) = ⨅a ≠ 0, principal (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans $ by simp [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Iio]
-- using Icc because
-- • don't have 'Ioo (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x' unless x > 0
-- • (x - y ≤ ε ↔ x ≤ ε + y) is true, while (x - y < ε ↔ x < ε + y) is not
lemma Icc_mem_nhds : x ≠ ⊤ → ε > 0 → Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
begin
assume xt ε0, rw mem_nhds_sets_iff,
by_cases x0 : x = 0,
{ use Iio (x + ε),
have : Iio (x + ε) ⊆ Icc (x - ε) (x + ε), assume a, rw x0, simpa using le_of_lt,
use this, exact ⟨is_open_Iio, mem_Iio_self_add xt ε0⟩ },
{ use Ioo (x - ε) (x + ε), use Ioo_subset_Icc_self,
exact ⟨is_open_Ioo, mem_Ioo_self_sub_add xt x0 ε0 ε0 ⟩ }
end
lemma nhds_of_ne_top : x ≠ ⊤ → 𝓝 x = ⨅ε > 0, principal (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
begin
assume xt, refine le_antisymm _ _,
-- first direction
simp only [le_infi_iff, le_principal_iff], assume ε ε0, exact Icc_mem_nhds xt ε0,
-- second direction
rw nhds_generate_from, refine le_infi (assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, _),
simp only [mem_set_of_eq] at hs, rcases hs with ⟨xs, ⟨a, ha⟩⟩,
cases ha,
{ rw ha at *,
rcases dense xs with ⟨b, ⟨ab, bx⟩⟩,
have xb_pos : x - b > 0 := zero_lt_sub_iff_lt.2 bx,
have xxb : x - (x - b) = b := sub_sub_cancel (by rwa lt_top_iff_ne_top) (le_of_lt bx),
refine infi_le_of_le (x - b) (infi_le_of_le xb_pos _),
simp only [mem_principal_sets, le_principal_iff],
assume y, rintros ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rw xxb at h₁, calc a < b : ab ... ≤ y : h₁ },
{ rw ha at *,
rcases dense xs with ⟨b, ⟨xb, ba⟩⟩,
have bx_pos : b - x > 0 := zero_lt_sub_iff_lt.2 xb,
have xbx : x + (b - x) = b := add_sub_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt xb),
refine infi_le_of_le (b - x) (infi_le_of_le bx_pos _),
simp only [mem_principal_sets, le_principal_iff],
assume y, rintros ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rw xbx at h₂, calc y ≤ b : h₂ ... < a : ba },
end
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ennreal` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : filter α} {u : α → ennreal} {a : ennreal} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, (u x) ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
by simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_infi, tendsto_principal, mem_Icc]
protected lemma tendsto_at_top [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → ennreal} {a : ennreal}
(ha : a ≠ ⊤) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀n≥N, (f n) ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
by simp only [ennreal.tendsto_nhds ha, mem_at_top_sets, mem_set_of_eq, filter.eventually]
lemma tendsto_coe_nnreal_nhds_top {α} {l : filter α} {f : α → nnreal} (h : tendsto f l at_top) :
tendsto (λa, (f a : ennreal)) l (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n,
have ∀ᶠ a in l, ↑(n+1) ≤ f a := h $ mem_at_top _,
mem_sets_of_superset this $ assume a (ha : ↑(n+1) ≤ f a),
begin
rw [← coe_nat],
dsimp,
exact coe_lt_coe.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat.cast_lt.2 (nat.lt_succ_self _)) ha)
end
instance : topological_add_monoid ennreal :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $
have hl : ∀a:ennreal, tendsto (λ (p : ennreal × ennreal), p.fst + p.snd) (𝓝 (⊤, a)) (𝓝 ⊤), from
assume a, tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n,
have set.prod {a | ↑n < a } univ ∈ 𝓝 ((⊤:ennreal), a), from
prod_mem_nhds_sets (lt_mem_nhds $ coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_top) univ_mem_sets,
show {a : ennreal × ennreal | ↑n < a.fst + a.snd} ∈ 𝓝 (⊤, a),
begin filter_upwards [this] assume ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ (le_add_right $ le_refl _) end,
begin
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩,
cases a₁, { simp [continuous_at, none_eq_top, hl a₂], },
cases a₂, { simp [continuous_at, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, nhds_swap (a₁ : ennreal) ⊤,
tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)], convert hl a₁, simp [add_comm] },
simp [continuous_at, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
simp only [coe_add.symm, tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
end ⟩
protected lemma tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto (λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
have ht : ∀b:ennreal, b ≠ 0 → tendsto (λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 ((⊤:ennreal), b)) (𝓝 ⊤),
begin
refine assume b hb, tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n, _,
rcases dense (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε', hε', hεb'⟩,
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hεb' with ⟨ε, rfl, h⟩,
rcases exists_nat_gt (↑n / ε) with ⟨m, hm⟩,
have hε : ε > 0, from coe_lt_coe.1 hε',
refine mem_sets_of_superset (prod_mem_nhds_sets (lt_mem_nhds $ @coe_lt_top m) (lt_mem_nhds $ h)) _,
rintros ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
dsimp at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
calc (n:ennreal) = ↑(((n:nnreal) / ε) * ε) :
begin
simp [nnreal.div_def],
rw [mul_assoc, ← coe_mul, nnreal.inv_mul_cancel, coe_one, ← coe_nat, mul_one],
exact zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.1 hε
end
... < (↑m * ε : nnreal) : coe_lt_coe.2 $ mul_lt_mul hm (le_refl _) hε (nat.cast_nonneg _)
... ≤ a₁ * a₂ : by rw [coe_mul]; exact canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul
(le_of_lt h₁)
(le_of_lt h₂)
end,
begin
cases a, {simp [none_eq_top] at hb, simp [none_eq_top, ht b hb, top_mul, hb] },
cases b, {
simp [none_eq_top] at ha,
have ha' : a ≠ 0, from mt coe_eq_coe.2 ha,
simp [*, nhds_swap (a : ennreal) ⊤, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, top_mul, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘), mul_comm] },
simp [some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
simp only [coe_mul.symm, tendsto_coe, tendsto_mul]
end
protected lemma tendsto.mul {f : filter α} {ma : α → ennreal} {mb : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hma : tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) (hmb : tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto (λa, ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show tendsto ((λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) ∘ (λa, (ma a, mb a))) f (𝓝 (a * b)), from
tendsto.comp (ennreal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
protected lemma tendsto.const_mul {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hm : tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) : tendsto (λb, a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases
(assume : a = 0, by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds])
(assume ha : a ≠ 0, ennreal.tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (or.inl ha) hm hb)
protected lemma tendsto.mul_const {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hm : tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) : tendsto (λx, m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using ennreal.tendsto.const_mul hm ha
protected lemma continuous_const_mul {a : ennreal} (ha : a < ⊤) : continuous ((*) a) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id $ or.inr $ ne_of_lt ha
protected lemma continuous_mul_const {a : ennreal} (ha : a < ⊤) : continuous (λ x, x * a) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using ennreal.continuous_const_mul ha
protected lemma continuous_inv : continuous (has_inv.inv : ennreal → ennreal) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ a, tendsto_order.2
⟨begin
assume b hb,
simp only [@ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv b],
exact gt_mem_nhds (ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv.1 hb),
end,
begin
assume b hb,
simp only [gt_iff_lt, @ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt _ b],
exact lt_mem_nhds (ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt.1 hb)
end⟩
@[simp] protected lemma tendsto_inv_iff {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a : ennreal} :
tendsto (λ x, (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [function.comp, ennreal.inv_inv]
using (ennreal.continuous_inv.tendsto a⁻¹).comp h,
(ennreal.continuous_inv.tendsto a).comp⟩
protected lemma tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : ennreal)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
ennreal.inv_top ▸ ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
lemma Sup_add {s : set ennreal} (hs : s.nonempty) : Sup s + a = ⨆b∈s, b + a :=
have Sup ((λb, b + a) '' s) = Sup s + a,
from is_lub.Sup_eq (is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _ h, add_le_add' h (le_refl _))
(is_lub_Sup s)
hs
(tendsto.add (tendsto_id' inf_le_left) tendsto_const_nhds)),
by simp [Sup_image, -add_comm] at this; exact this.symm
lemma supr_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ennreal} [h : nonempty ι] : supr s + a = ⨆b, s b + a :=
let ⟨x⟩ := h in
calc supr s + a = Sup (range s) + a : by simp [Sup_range]
... = (⨆b∈range s, b + a) : Sup_add ⟨s x, x, rfl⟩
... = _ : supr_range
lemma add_supr {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ennreal} [h : nonempty ι] : a + supr s = ⨆b, a + s b :=
by rw [add_comm, supr_add]; simp [add_comm]
lemma supr_add_supr {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ennreal} (h : ∀i j, ∃k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
supr f + supr g = (⨆ a, f a + g a) :=
begin
by_cases hι : nonempty ι,
{ letI := hι,
refine le_antisymm _ (supr_le $ λ a, add_le_add' (le_supr _ _) (le_supr _ _)),
simpa [add_supr, supr_add] using
λ i j:ι, show f i + g j ≤ ⨆ a, f a + g a, from
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h i j in le_supr_of_le k hk },
{ have : ∀f:ι → ennreal, (⨆i, f i) = 0 := assume f, bot_unique (supr_le $ assume i, (hι ⟨i⟩).elim),
rw [this, this, this, zero_add] }
end
lemma supr_add_supr_of_monotone {ι : Sort*} [semilattice_sup ι]
{f g : ι → ennreal} (hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) :
supr f + supr g = (⨆ a, f a + g a) :=
supr_add_supr $ assume i j, ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add' (hf $ le_sup_left) (hg $ le_sup_right)⟩
lemma finset_sum_supr_nat {α} {ι} [semilattice_sup ι] {s : finset α} {f : α → ι → ennreal}
(hf : ∀a, monotone (f a)) :
s.sum (λa, supr (f a)) = (⨆ n, s.sum (λa, f a n)) :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on s _ _,
{ simp,
exact (bot_unique $ supr_le $ assume i, le_refl ⊥).symm },
{ assume a s has ih,
simp only [finset.sum_insert has],
rw [ih, supr_add_supr_of_monotone (hf a)],
assume i j h,
exact (finset.sum_le_sum $ assume a ha, hf a h) }
end
section priority
-- for some reason the next proof fails without changing the priority of this instance
local attribute [instance, priority 1000] classical.prop_decidable
lemma mul_Sup {s : set ennreal} {a : ennreal} : a * Sup s = ⨆i∈s, a * i :=
begin
by_cases hs : ∀x∈s, x = (0:ennreal),
{ have h₁ : Sup s = 0 := (bot_unique $ Sup_le $ assume a ha, (hs a ha).symm ▸ le_refl 0),
have h₂ : (⨆i ∈ s, a * i) = 0 :=
(bot_unique $ supr_le $ assume a, supr_le $ assume ha, by simp [hs a ha]),
rw [h₁, h₂, mul_zero] },
{ simp only [not_forall] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx, hx0⟩,
have s₁ : Sup s ≠ 0 :=
zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 hx0) (le_Sup hx)),
have : Sup ((λb, a * b) '' s) = a * Sup s :=
is_lub.Sup_eq (is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _ h, canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) h)
(is_lub_Sup _)
⟨x, hx⟩
(ennreal.tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_id' inf_le_left) (or.inl s₁))),
rw [this.symm, Sup_image] }
end
end priority
lemma mul_supr {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ennreal} {a : ennreal} : a * supr f = ⨆i, a * f i :=
by rw [← Sup_range, mul_Sup, supr_range]
lemma supr_mul {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ennreal} {a : ennreal} : supr f * a = ⨆i, f i * a :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_supr]; congr; funext; rw [mul_comm]
protected lemma tendsto_coe_sub : ∀{b:ennreal}, tendsto (λb:ennreal, ↑r - b) (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (↑r - b)) :=
begin
refine (forall_ennreal.2 $ and.intro (assume a, _) _),
{ simp [@nhds_coe a, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘), tendsto_coe, coe_sub.symm],
exact nnreal.tendsto.sub tendsto_const_nhds tendsto_id },
simp,
exact (tendsto.congr' (mem_sets_of_superset (lt_mem_nhds $ @coe_lt_top r) $
by simp [le_of_lt] {contextual := tt})) tendsto_const_nhds
end
lemma sub_supr {ι : Sort*} [hι : nonempty ι] {b : ι → ennreal} (hr : a < ⊤) :
a - (⨆i, b i) = (⨅i, a - b i) :=
let ⟨i⟩ := hι in
let ⟨r, eq, _⟩ := lt_iff_exists_coe.mp hr in
have Inf ((λb, ↑r - b) '' range b) = ↑r - (⨆i, b i),
from is_glb.Inf_eq $ is_glb_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _, sub_le_sub (le_refl _))
is_lub_supr
⟨_, i, rfl⟩
(tendsto.comp ennreal.tendsto_coe_sub (tendsto_id' inf_le_left)),
by rw [eq, ←this]; simp [Inf_image, infi_range, -mem_range]; exact le_refl _
end topological_space
section tsum
variables {f g : α → ennreal}
@[elim_cast] protected lemma has_sum_coe {f : α → nnreal} {r : nnreal} :
has_sum (λa, (f a : ennreal)) ↑r ↔ has_sum f r :=
have (λs:finset α, s.sum (coe ∘ f)) = (coe : nnreal → ennreal) ∘ (λs:finset α, s.sum f),
from funext $ assume s, ennreal.coe_finset_sum.symm,
by unfold has_sum; rw [this, tendsto_coe]
protected lemma tsum_coe_eq {f : α → nnreal} (h : has_sum f r) : (∑a, (f a : ennreal)) = r :=
tsum_eq_has_sum $ ennreal.has_sum_coe.2 $ h
protected lemma coe_tsum {f : α → nnreal} : summable f → ↑(tsum f) = (∑a, (f a : ennreal))
| ⟨r, hr⟩ := by rw [tsum_eq_has_sum hr, ennreal.tsum_coe_eq hr]
protected lemma has_sum : has_sum f (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) :=
tendsto_order.2
⟨assume a' ha',
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := lt_supr_iff.mp ha' in
mem_at_top_sets.mpr ⟨s, assume t ht, lt_of_lt_of_le hs $ finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset ht⟩,
assume a' ha',
univ_mem_sets' $ assume s,
have s.sum f ≤ ⨆(s : finset α), s.sum f,
from le_supr (λ(s : finset α), s.sum f) s,
lt_of_le_of_lt this ha'⟩
@[simp] protected lemma summable : summable f := ⟨_, ennreal.has_sum⟩
lemma tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable {f : β → nnreal} :
(∑ b, (f b:ennreal)) ≠ ∞ ↔ summable f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, ennreal.coe_tsum h ▸ ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩,
lift (∑ b, (f b:ennreal)) to nnreal using h with a ha,
refine ⟨a, ennreal.has_sum_coe.1 _⟩,
rw ha,
exact has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable
end
protected lemma tsum_eq_supr_sum : (∑a, f a) = (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) :=
tsum_eq_has_sum ennreal.has_sum
protected lemma tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top : (∃ a, f a = ∞) → (∑ a, f a) = ∞
| ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
begin
rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum],
apply le_antisymm le_top,
convert le_supr (λ s:finset α, s.sum f) (finset.singleton a),
rw [finset.sum_singleton, ha]
end
protected lemma ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (h : (∑ a, f a) ≠ ∞) (a : α) : f a ≠ ∞ :=
λ ha, h $ ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, ha⟩
protected lemma tsum_sigma {β : α → Type*} (f : Πa, β a → ennreal) :
(∑p:Σa, β a, f p.1 p.2) = (∑a b, f a b) :=
tsum_sigma (assume b, ennreal.summable) ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_prod {f : α → β → ennreal} : (∑p:α×β, f p.1 p.2) = (∑a, ∑b, f a b) :=
let j : α × β → (Σa:α, β) := λp, sigma.mk p.1 p.2 in
let i : (Σa:α, β) → α × β := λp, (p.1, p.2) in
let f' : (Σa:α, β) → ennreal := λp, f p.1 p.2 in
calc (∑p:α×β, f' (j p)) = (∑p:Σa:α, β, f p.1 p.2) :
tsum_eq_tsum_of_iso j i (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl)
... = (∑a, ∑b, f a b) : ennreal.tsum_sigma f
protected lemma tsum_comm {f : α → β → ennreal} : (∑a, ∑b, f a b) = (∑b, ∑a, f a b) :=
let f' : α×β → ennreal := λp, f p.1 p.2 in
calc (∑a, ∑b, f a b) = (∑p:α×β, f' p) : ennreal.tsum_prod.symm
... = (∑p:β×α, f' (prod.swap p)) :
(tsum_eq_tsum_of_iso prod.swap (@prod.swap α β) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl)).symm
... = (∑b, ∑a, f' (prod.swap (b, a))) : @ennreal.tsum_prod β α (λb a, f' (prod.swap (b, a)))
protected lemma tsum_add : (∑a, f a + g a) = (∑a, f a) + (∑a, g a) :=
tsum_add ennreal.summable ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀a, f a ≤ g a) : (∑a, f a) ≤ (∑a, g a) :=
tsum_le_tsum h ennreal.summable ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_eq_supr_nat {f : ℕ → ennreal} :
(∑i:ℕ, f i) = (⨆i:ℕ, (finset.range i).sum f) :=
calc _ = (⨆s:finset ℕ, s.sum f) : ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum
... = (⨆i:ℕ, (finset.range i).sum f) : le_antisymm
(supr_le_supr2 $ assume s,
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := finset.exists_nat_subset_range s in
⟨n, finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset hn⟩)
(supr_le_supr2 $ assume i, ⟨finset.range i, le_refl _⟩)
protected lemma le_tsum (a : α) : f a ≤ (∑a, f a) :=
calc f a = ({a} : finset α).sum f : by simp
... ≤ (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) : le_supr (λs:finset α, s.sum f) _
... = (∑a, f a) : by rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum]
protected lemma mul_tsum : (∑i, a * f i) = a * (∑i, f i) :=
if h : ∀i, f i = 0 then by simp [h] else
let ⟨i, (hi : f i ≠ 0)⟩ := classical.not_forall.mp h in
have sum_ne_0 : (∑i, f i) ≠ 0, from ne_of_gt $
calc 0 < f i : lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) hi.symm
... ≤ (∑i, f i) : ennreal.le_tsum _,
have tendsto (λs:finset α, s.sum ((*) a ∘ f)) at_top (𝓝 (a * (∑i, f i))),
by rw [← show (*) a ∘ (λs:finset α, s.sum f) = λs, s.sum ((*) a ∘ f),
from funext $ λ s, finset.mul_sum];
exact ennreal.tendsto.const_mul (has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable) (or.inl sum_ne_0),
tsum_eq_has_sum this
protected lemma tsum_mul : (∑i, f i * a) = (∑i, f i) * a :=
by simp [mul_comm, ennreal.mul_tsum]
@[simp] lemma tsum_supr_eq {α : Type*} (a : α) {f : α → ennreal} :
(∑b:α, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) = f a :=
le_antisymm
(by rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum]; exact supr_le (assume s,
calc s.sum (λb, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) ≤ (finset.singleton a).sum (λb, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) :
finset.sum_le_sum_of_ne_zero $ assume b _ hb,
suffices a = b, by simpa using this.symm,
classical.by_contradiction $ assume h,
by simpa [h] using hb
... = f a : by simp))
(calc f a ≤ (⨆ (h : a = a), f a) : le_supr (λh:a=a, f a) rfl
... ≤ (∑b:α, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) : ennreal.le_tsum _)
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ennreal} (r : ennreal) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
begin
refine ⟨tendsto_sum_nat_of_has_sum, assume h, _⟩,
rw [← supr_eq_of_tendsto _ h, ← ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat],
{ exact has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable },
{ exact assume s t hst, finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset (finset.range_subset.2 hst) }
end
end tsum
end ennreal
namespace nnreal
lemma exists_le_has_sum_of_le {f g : β → nnreal} {r : nnreal}
(hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) (hfr : has_sum f r) : ∃p≤r, has_sum g p :=
have (∑b, (g b : ennreal)) ≤ r,
begin
refine has_sum_le (assume b, _) (has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable) (ennreal.has_sum_coe.2 hfr),
exact ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 (hgf _)
end,
let ⟨p, eq, hpr⟩ := ennreal.le_coe_iff.1 this in
⟨p, hpr, ennreal.has_sum_coe.1 $ eq ▸ has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable⟩
lemma summable_of_le {f g : β → nnreal} (hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) : summable f → summable g
| ⟨r, hfr⟩ := let ⟨p, _, hp⟩ := exists_le_has_sum_of_le hgf hfr in summable_spec hp
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → nnreal} (r : nnreal) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.has_sum_coe, ennreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat],
simp only [ennreal.coe_finset_sum.symm],
exact ennreal.tendsto_coe
end
end nnreal
lemma summable_of_nonneg_of_le {f g : β → ℝ}
(hg : ∀b, 0 ≤ g b) (hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) (hf : summable f) : summable g :=
let f' (b : β) : nnreal := ⟨f b, le_trans (hg b) (hgf b)⟩ in
let g' (b : β) : nnreal := ⟨g b, hg b⟩ in
have summable f', from nnreal.summable_coe.1 hf,
have summable g', from
nnreal.summable_of_le (assume b, (@nnreal.coe_le (g' b) (f' b)).2 $ hgf b) this,
show summable (λb, g' b : β → ℝ), from nnreal.summable_coe.2 this
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀i, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
⟨tendsto_sum_nat_of_has_sum,
assume hfr,
have 0 ≤ r := ge_of_tendsto at_top_ne_bot hfr $ univ_mem_sets' $ assume i,
show 0 ≤ (finset.range i).sum f, from finset.sum_nonneg $ assume i _, hf i,
let f' (n : ℕ) : nnreal := ⟨f n, hf n⟩, r' : nnreal := ⟨r, this⟩ in
have f_eq : f = (λi:ℕ, (f' i : ℝ)) := rfl,
have r_eq : r = r' := rfl,
begin
rw [f_eq, r_eq, nnreal.has_sum_coe, nnreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat, ← nnreal.tendsto_coe],
simp only [nnreal.coe_sum],
exact hfr
end⟩
lemma infi_real_pos_eq_infi_nnreal_pos {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ → α} :
(⨅(n:ℝ) (h : n > 0), f n) = (⨅(n:nnreal) (h : n > 0), f n) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume n, le_infi $ assume hn, infi_le_of_le n $ infi_le _ (nnreal.coe_pos.2 hn))
(le_infi $ assume r, le_infi $ assume hr, infi_le_of_le ⟨r, le_of_lt hr⟩ $ infi_le _ hr)
section
variables [emetric_space β]
open lattice ennreal filter emetric
/-- In an emetric ball, the distance between points is everywhere finite -/
lemma edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball {a : β} {r : ennreal} (x y : ball a r) : edist x.1 y.1 ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 $
calc edist x y ≤ edist a x + edist a y : edist_triangle_left x.1 y.1 a
... < r + r : by rw [edist_comm a x, edist_comm a y]; exact add_lt_add x.2 y.2
... ≤ ⊤ : le_top
/-- Each ball in an extended metric space gives us a metric space, as the edist
is everywhere finite. -/
def metric_space_emetric_ball (a : β) (r : ennreal) : metric_space (ball a r) :=
emetric_space.to_metric_space edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball
local attribute [instance] metric_space_emetric_ball
lemma nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball (a x : β) (r : ennreal) (h : x ∈ ball a r) :
𝓝 x = map (coe : ball a r → β) (𝓝 ⟨x, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val_eq _ $ mem_nhds_sets emetric.is_open_ball h).symm
end
section
variable [emetric_space α]
open emetric
/-- Yet another metric characterization of Cauchy sequences on integers. This one is often the
most efficient. -/
lemma emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0 [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {s : β → α} :
cauchy_seq s ↔ (∃ (b: β → ennreal), (∀ n m N : β, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N)
∧ (tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0))) :=
⟨begin
assume hs,
rw emetric.cauchy_seq_iff at hs,
/- `s` is Cauchy sequence. The sequence `b` will be constructed by taking
the supremum of the distances between `s n` and `s m` for `n m ≥ N`-/
let b := λN, Sup ((λ(p : β × β), edist (s p.1) (s p.2))''{p | p.1 ≥ N ∧ p.2 ≥ N}),
--Prove that it bounds the distances of points in the Cauchy sequence
have C : ∀ n m N, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N,
{ refine λm n N hm hn, le_Sup _,
use (prod.mk m n),
simp only [and_true, eq_self_iff_true, set.mem_set_of_eq],
exact ⟨hm, hn⟩ },
--Prove that it tends to `0`, by using the Cauchy property of `s`
have D : tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0),
{ refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨λa ha, absurd ha (ennreal.not_lt_zero), λε εpos, _⟩,
rcases dense εpos with ⟨δ, δpos, δlt⟩,
rcases hs δ δpos with ⟨N, hN⟩,
refine filter.mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨N, λn hn, _⟩,
have : b n ≤ δ := Sup_le begin
simp only [and_imp, set.mem_image, set.mem_set_of_eq, exists_imp_distrib, prod.exists],
intros d p q hp hq hd,
rw ← hd,
exact le_of_lt (hN p q (le_trans hn hp) (le_trans hn hq))
end,
simpa using lt_of_le_of_lt this δlt },
-- Conclude
exact ⟨b, ⟨C, D⟩⟩
end,
begin
rintros ⟨b, ⟨b_bound, b_lim⟩⟩,
/-b : ℕ → ℝ, b_bound : ∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N,
b_lim : tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0)-/
refine emetric.cauchy_seq_iff.2 (λε εpos, _),
have : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, b n < ε := (tendsto_order.1 b_lim ).2 _ εpos,
rcases filter.mem_at_top_sets.1 this with ⟨N, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, λm n hm hn, calc
edist (s m) (s n) ≤ b N : b_bound m n N hm hn
... < ε : (hN _ (le_refl N)) ⟩
end⟩
lemma continuous_of_le_add_edist {f : α → ennreal} (C : ennreal)
(hC : C ≠ ⊤) (h : ∀x y, f x ≤ f y + C * edist x y) : continuous f :=
begin
refine continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 (λx, tendsto_order.2 ⟨_, _⟩),
show ∀e, e < f x → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, e < f y,
{ assume e he,
let ε := min (f x - e) 1,
have : ε < ⊤ := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]),
have : 0 < ε := by simp [ε, hC, he, ennreal.zero_lt_one],
have : 0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2) := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 (by simp [hC, (ne_of_lt this).symm, ennreal.mul_eq_zero]),
have I : C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) < ε,
{ by_cases C_zero : C = 0,
{ simp [C_zero, ‹0 < ε›] },
{ calc C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) = (C * C⁻¹) * (ε/2) : by simp [mul_assoc]
... = ε/2 : by simp [ennreal.mul_inv_cancel C_zero hC]
... < ε : ennreal.half_lt_self (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.1 ‹0 < ε›) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ‹ε < ⊤›) }},
have : ball x (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) ⊆ {y : α | e < f y},
{ rintros y hy,
by_cases htop : f y = ⊤,
{ simp [htop, lt_top_iff_ne_top, ne_top_of_lt he] },
{ simp at hy,
have : e + ε < f y + ε := calc
e + ε ≤ e + (f x - e) : add_le_add_left' (min_le_left _ _)
... = f x : by simp [le_of_lt he]
... ≤ f y + C * edist x y : h x y
... = f y + C * edist y x : by simp [edist_comm]
... ≤ f y + C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) :
add_le_add_left' $ canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (le_of_lt hy)
... < f y + ε : (ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 htop)).2 I,
show e < f y, from
(ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_right ‹ε < ⊤›).1 this }},
apply filter.mem_sets_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ (‹0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2)›)) this },
show ∀e, f x < e → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f y < e,
{ assume e he,
let ε := min (e - f x) 1,
have : ε < ⊤ := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]),
have : 0 < ε := by simp [ε, he, ennreal.zero_lt_one],
have : 0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2) := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 (by simp [hC, (ne_of_lt this).symm, ennreal.mul_eq_zero]),
have I : C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) < ε,
{ by_cases C_zero : C = 0,
simp [C_zero, ‹0 < ε›],
calc C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) = (C * C⁻¹) * (ε/2) : by simp [mul_assoc]
... = ε/2 : by simp [ennreal.mul_inv_cancel C_zero hC]
... < ε : ennreal.half_lt_self (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.1 ‹0 < ε›) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ‹ε < ⊤›) },
have : ball x (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) ⊆ {y : α | f y < e},
{ rintros y hy,
have htop : f x ≠ ⊤ := ne_top_of_lt he,
show f y < e, from calc
f y ≤ f x + C * edist y x : h y x
... ≤ f x + C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) :
add_le_add_left' $ canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (le_of_lt hy)
... < f x + ε : (ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 htop)).2 I
... ≤ f x + (e - f x) : add_le_add_left' (min_le_left _ _)
... = e : by simp [le_of_lt he] },
apply filter.mem_sets_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ (‹0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2)›)) this },
end
theorem continuous_edist' : continuous (λp:α×α, edist p.1 p.2) :=
begin
apply continuous_of_le_add_edist 2 (by simp),
rintros ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩,
calc edist x y ≤ edist x x' + edist x' y' + edist y' y : edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
... = edist x' y' + (edist x x' + edist y y') : by simp [edist_comm]; cc
... ≤ edist x' y' + (edist (x, y) (x', y') + edist (x, y) (x', y')) :
add_le_add_left' (add_le_add' (by simp [edist, le_refl]) (by simp [edist, le_refl]))
... = edist x' y' + 2 * edist (x, y) (x', y') : by rw [← mul_two, mul_comm]
end
theorem continuous_edist [topological_space β] {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, edist (f b) (g b)) :=
continuous_edist'.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
theorem tendsto_edist {f g : β → α} {x : filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
tendsto (λx, edist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (edist a b)) :=
have tendsto (λp:α×α, edist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (edist a b)),
from continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp continuous_edist' (a, b),
tendsto.comp (by rw [nhds_prod_eq] at this; exact this) (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : tsum d ≠ ∞) :
cauchy_seq f :=
begin
lift d to (ℕ → nnreal) using (λ i, ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hd i),
rw ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable at hd,
exact cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_summable d hf hd
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded above by a function `d : ℕ → ennreal`,
then the distance from `f n` to the limit is bounded by `∑_{k=n}^∞ d k`. -/
lemma edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
{a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ ∑ m, d (n + m) :=
begin
refine le_of_tendsto at_top_ne_bot (tendsto_edist tendsto_const_nhds ha)
(mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨n, λ m hnm, _⟩),
refine le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le hnm (λ k _ _, hf k)) _,
rw [finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range],
exact sum_le_tsum _ (λ _ _, zero_le _) ennreal.summable
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded above by a function `d : ℕ → ennreal`,
then the distance from `f 0` to the limit is bounded by `∑_{k=0}^∞ d k`. -/
lemma edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto₀ {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
{a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ ∑ m, d m :=
by simpa using edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto d hf ha 0
end --section
|
fb01cbc61115b6c8a13eaa2b721222f807e27a69 | fecda8e6b848337561d6467a1e30cf23176d6ad0 | /src/data/multiset/basic.lean | 24dc8e9b2517ba0985146f6c12bca0b00fd7452b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | spolu/mathlib | bacf18c3d2a561d00ecdc9413187729dd1f705ed | 480c92cdfe1cf3c2d083abded87e82162e8814f4 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,684,094,325 | 1,600,736,045,000 | 1,600,736,045,000 | 297,564,749 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,600,758,368,000 | 1,600,758,367,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 84,551 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.list.perm
import algebra.group_power
/-!
# Multisets
These are implemented as the quotient of a list by permutations.
-/
open list subtype nat
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `multiset α` is the quotient of `list α` by list permutation. The result
is a type of finite sets with duplicates allowed. -/
def {u} multiset (α : Type u) : Type u :=
quotient (list.is_setoid α)
namespace multiset
instance : has_coe (list α) (multiset α) := ⟨quot.mk _⟩
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_to_coe (l : list α) : @eq (multiset α) ⟦l⟧ l := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_to_coe' (l : list α) : @eq (multiset α) (quot.mk (≈) l) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_to_coe'' (l : list α) : @eq (multiset α) (quot.mk setoid.r l) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (l₁ : multiset α) = l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ := quotient.eq
instance has_decidable_eq [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (multiset α)
| s₁ s₂ := quotient.rec_on_subsingleton₂ s₁ s₂ $ λ l₁ l₂,
decidable_of_iff' _ quotient.eq
/-- defines a size for a multiset by referring to the size of the underlying list -/
protected def sizeof [has_sizeof α] (s : multiset α) : ℕ :=
quot.lift_on s sizeof $ λ l₁ l₂, perm.sizeof_eq_sizeof
instance has_sizeof [has_sizeof α] : has_sizeof (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.sizeof⟩
/- empty multiset -/
/-- `0 : multiset α` is the empty set -/
protected def zero : multiset α := @nil α
instance : has_zero (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.zero⟩
instance : has_emptyc (multiset α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : inhabited (multiset α) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_nil_eq_zero : (@nil α : multiset α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_eq_zero : (∅ : multiset α) = 0 := rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero (l : list α) : (l : multiset α) = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
iff.trans coe_eq_coe perm_nil
/- cons -/
/-- `cons a s` is the multiset which contains `s` plus one more
instance of `a`. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (a :: l : multiset α))
(λ l₁ l₂ p, quot.sound (p.cons a))
notation a :: b := cons a b
instance : has_insert α (multiset α) := ⟨cons⟩
@[simp] theorem insert_eq_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
insert a s = a::s := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_coe (a : α) (l : list α) :
(a::l : multiset α) = (a::l : list α) := rfl
theorem singleton_coe (a : α) : (a::0 : multiset α) = ([a] : list α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_inj_left {a b : α} (s : multiset α) :
a::s = b::s ↔ a = b :=
⟨quot.induction_on s $ λ l e,
have [a] ++ l ~ [b] ++ l, from quotient.exact e,
singleton_perm_singleton.1 $ (perm_append_right_iff _).1 this, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp] theorem cons_inj_right (a : α) : ∀{s t : multiset α}, a::s = a::t ↔ s = t :=
by rintros ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩; simp
@[recursor 5] protected theorem induction {p : multiset α → Prop}
(h₁ : p 0) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : multiset α}, p s → p (a :: s)) : ∀s, p s :=
by rintros ⟨l⟩; induction l with _ _ ih; [exact h₁, exact h₂ ih]
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected theorem induction_on {p : multiset α → Prop}
(s : multiset α) (h₁ : p 0) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : multiset α}, p s → p (a :: s)) : p s :=
multiset.induction h₁ h₂ s
theorem cons_swap (a b : α) (s : multiset α) : a :: b :: s = b :: a :: s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, quotient.sound $ perm.swap _ _ _
section rec
variables {C : multiset α → Sort*}
/-- Dependent recursor on multisets.
TODO: should be @[recursor 6], but then the definition of `multiset.pi` fails with a stack
overflow in `whnf`.
-/
protected def rec
(C_0 : C 0)
(C_cons : Πa m, C m → C (a::m))
(C_cons_heq : ∀a a' m b, C_cons a (a'::m) (C_cons a' m b) == C_cons a' (a::m) (C_cons a m b))
(m : multiset α) : C m :=
quotient.hrec_on m (@list.rec α (λl, C ⟦l⟧) C_0 (λa l b, C_cons a ⟦l⟧ b)) $
assume l l' h,
h.rec_heq
(assume a l l' b b' hl, have ⟦l⟧ = ⟦l'⟧, from quot.sound hl, by cc)
(assume a a' l, C_cons_heq a a' ⟦l⟧)
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected def rec_on (m : multiset α)
(C_0 : C 0)
(C_cons : Πa m, C m → C (a::m))
(C_cons_heq : ∀a a' m b, C_cons a (a'::m) (C_cons a' m b) == C_cons a' (a::m) (C_cons a m b)) :
C m :=
multiset.rec C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq m
variables {C_0 : C 0} {C_cons : Πa m, C m → C (a::m)}
{C_cons_heq : ∀a a' m b, C_cons a (a'::m) (C_cons a' m b) == C_cons a' (a::m) (C_cons a m b)}
@[simp] lemma rec_on_0 : @multiset.rec_on α C (0:multiset α) C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma rec_on_cons (a : α) (m : multiset α) :
(a :: m).rec_on C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_cons a m (m.rec_on C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq) :=
quotient.induction_on m $ assume l, rfl
end rec
section mem
/-- `a ∈ s` means that `a` has nonzero multiplicity in `s`. -/
def mem (a : α) (s : multiset α) : Prop :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, a ∈ l) (λ l₁ l₂ (e : l₁ ~ l₂), propext $ e.mem_iff)
instance : has_mem α (multiset α) := ⟨mem⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_coe {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ (l : multiset α) ↔ a ∈ l := iff.rfl
instance decidable_mem [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : multiset α) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
quot.rec_on_subsingleton s $ list.decidable_mem a
@[simp] theorem mem_cons {a b : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ b :: s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, iff.rfl
lemma mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ b :: s :=
mem_cons.2 $ or.inr h
@[simp] theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : multiset α) : a ∈ a :: s :=
mem_cons.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : multiset α} :
(∀ x ∈ (a :: s), p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
quotient.induction_on' s $ λ L, list.forall_mem_cons
theorem exists_cons_of_mem {s : multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → ∃ t, s = a :: t :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l (h : a ∈ l),
let ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩ := mem_split h in
e.symm ▸ ⟨(l₁++l₂ : list α), quot.sound perm_middle⟩
@[simp] theorem not_mem_zero (a : α) : a ∉ (0 : multiset α) := id
theorem eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem {s : multiset α} : (∀x, x ∉ s) → s = 0 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, by rw eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr H; refl
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem {s : multiset α} : s = 0 ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ s :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ _, not_false, eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem⟩
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_zero {s : multiset α} : s ≠ 0 → ∃ a : α, a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ assume l hl,
match l, hl with
| [] := assume h, false.elim $ h rfl
| (a :: l) := assume _, ⟨a, by simp⟩
end
@[simp] lemma zero_ne_cons {a : α} {m : multiset α} : 0 ≠ a :: m :=
assume h, have a ∈ (0:multiset α), from h.symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _, not_mem_zero _ this
@[simp] lemma cons_ne_zero {a : α} {m : multiset α} : a :: m ≠ 0 := zero_ne_cons.symm
lemma cons_eq_cons {a b : α} {as bs : multiset α} :
a :: as = b :: bs ↔ ((a = b ∧ as = bs) ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ ∃cs, as = b :: cs ∧ bs = a :: cs)) :=
begin
haveI : decidable_eq α := classical.dec_eq α,
split,
{ assume eq,
by_cases a = b,
{ subst h, simp * at * },
{ have : a ∈ b :: bs, from eq ▸ mem_cons_self _ _,
have : a ∈ bs, by simpa [h],
rcases exists_cons_of_mem this with ⟨cs, hcs⟩,
simp [h, hcs],
have : a :: as = b :: a :: cs, by simp [eq, hcs],
have : a :: as = a :: b :: cs, by rwa [cons_swap],
simpa using this } },
{ assume h,
rcases h with ⟨eq₁, eq₂⟩ | ⟨h, cs, eq₁, eq₂⟩,
{ simp * },
{ simp [*, cons_swap a b] } }
end
end mem
/- subset -/
section subset
/-- `s ⊆ t` is the lift of the list subset relation. It means that any
element with nonzero multiplicity in `s` has nonzero multiplicity in `t`,
but it does not imply that the multiplicity of `a` in `s` is less or equal than in `t`;
see `s ≤ t` for this relation. -/
protected def subset (s t : multiset α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t
instance : has_subset (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.subset⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (l₁ : multiset α) ⊆ l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem subset.refl (s : multiset α) : s ⊆ s := λ a h, h
theorem subset.trans {s t u : multiset α} : s ⊆ t → t ⊆ u → s ⊆ u :=
λ h₁ h₂ a m, h₂ (h₁ m)
theorem subset_iff {s t : multiset α} : s ⊆ t ↔ (∀⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ t) := iff.rfl
theorem mem_of_subset {s t : multiset α} {a : α} (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t := @h _
@[simp] theorem zero_subset (s : multiset α) : 0 ⊆ s :=
λ a, (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {s t : multiset α} : (a :: s) ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
by simp [subset_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem eq_zero_of_subset_zero {s : multiset α} (h : s ⊆ 0) : s = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem h
theorem subset_zero {s : multiset α} : s ⊆ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_subset_zero, λ xeq, xeq.symm ▸ subset.refl 0⟩
end subset
section to_list
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
@[reducible] noncomputable def to_list {α : Type*} (s : multiset α) :=
classical.some (quotient.exists_rep s)
@[simp] lemma to_list_zero {α : Type*} : (multiset.to_list 0 : list α) = [] :=
(multiset.coe_eq_zero _).1 (classical.some_spec (quotient.exists_rep multiset.zero))
lemma coe_to_list {α : Type*} (s : multiset α) : (s.to_list : multiset α) = s :=
classical.some_spec (quotient.exists_rep _)
lemma mem_to_list {α : Type*} (a : α) (s : multiset α) : a ∈ s.to_list ↔ a ∈ s :=
by rw [←multiset.mem_coe, multiset.coe_to_list]
end to_list
/- multiset order -/
/-- `s ≤ t` means that `s` is a sublist of `t` (up to permutation).
Equivalently, `s ≤ t` means that `count a s ≤ count a t` for all `a`. -/
protected def le (s t : multiset α) : Prop :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s t (<+~) $ λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂,
propext (p₂.subperm_left.trans p₁.subperm_right)
instance : partial_order (multiset α) :=
{ le := multiset.le,
le_refl := by rintros ⟨l⟩; exact subperm.refl _,
le_trans := by rintros ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩ ⟨l₃⟩; exact @subperm.trans _ _ _ _,
le_antisymm := by rintros ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩ h₁ h₂; exact quot.sound (subperm.antisymm h₁ h₂) }
theorem subset_of_le {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ t → s ⊆ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, subperm.subset
theorem mem_of_le {s t : multiset α} {a : α} (h : s ≤ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
mem_of_subset (subset_of_le h)
@[simp] theorem coe_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (l₁ : multiset α) ≤ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ := iff.rfl
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem le_induction_on {C : multiset α → multiset α → Prop}
{s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t)
(H : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → C l₁ l₂) : C s t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t (λ l₁ l₂ ⟨l, p, s⟩,
(show ⟦l⟧ = ⟦l₁⟧, from quot.sound p) ▸ H s) h
theorem zero_le (s : multiset α) : 0 ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, (nil_sublist l).subperm
theorem le_zero {s : multiset α} : s ≤ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨λ h, le_antisymm h (zero_le _), le_of_eq⟩
theorem lt_cons_self (s : multiset α) (a : α) : s < a :: s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l,
suffices l <+~ a :: l ∧ (¬l ~ a :: l),
by simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne],
⟨(sublist_cons _ _).subperm,
λ p, ne_of_lt (lt_succ_self (length l)) p.length_eq⟩
theorem le_cons_self (s : multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a :: s :=
le_of_lt $ lt_cons_self _ _
theorem cons_le_cons_iff (a : α) {s t : multiset α} : a :: s ≤ a :: t ↔ s ≤ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, subperm_cons a
theorem cons_le_cons (a : α) {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ t → a :: s ≤ a :: t :=
(cons_le_cons_iff a).2
theorem le_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {s t : multiset α} (m : a ∉ s) : s ≤ a :: t ↔ s ≤ t :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, le_trans h $ le_cons_self _ _⟩,
suffices : ∀ {t'} (_ : s ≤ t') (_ : a ∈ t'), a :: s ≤ t',
{ exact λ h, (cons_le_cons_iff a).1 (this h (mem_cons_self _ _)) },
introv h, revert m, refine le_induction_on h _,
introv s m₁ m₂,
rcases mem_split m₂ with ⟨r₁, r₂, rfl⟩,
exact perm_middle.subperm_left.2 ((subperm_cons _).2 $
((sublist_or_mem_of_sublist s).resolve_right m₁).subperm)
end
/- cardinality -/
/-- The cardinality of a multiset is the sum of the multiplicities
of all its elements, or simply the length of the underlying list. -/
def card (s : multiset α) : ℕ :=
quot.lift_on s length $ λ l₁ l₂, perm.length_eq
@[simp] theorem coe_card (l : list α) : card (l : multiset α) = length l := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_zero : @card α 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) : card (a :: s) = card s + 1 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card (a::0) = 1 := by simp
theorem card_le_of_le {s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card s ≤ card t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂, length_le_of_sublist
theorem eq_of_le_of_card_le {s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card t ≤ card s → s = t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ s h₂, congr_arg coe $ eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s h₂
theorem card_lt_of_lt {s t : multiset α} (h : s < t) : card s < card t :=
lt_of_not_ge $ λ h₂, ne_of_lt h $ eq_of_le_of_card_le (le_of_lt h) h₂
theorem lt_iff_cons_le {s t : multiset α} : s < t ↔ ∃ a, a :: s ≤ t :=
⟨quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h,
subperm.exists_of_length_lt (le_of_lt h) (card_lt_of_lt h),
λ ⟨a, h⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_cons_self _ _) h⟩
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero {s : multiset α} : card s = 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨λ h, (eq_of_le_of_card_le (zero_le _) (le_of_eq h)).symm, λ e, by simp [e]⟩
theorem card_pos {s : multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ s ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans $ not_congr card_eq_zero
theorem card_pos_iff_exists_mem {s : multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, length_pos_iff_exists_mem
@[elab_as_eliminator] def strong_induction_on {p : multiset α → Sort*} :
∀ (s : multiset α), (∀ s, (∀t < s, p t) → p s) → p s
| s := λ ih, ih s $ λ t h,
have card t < card s, from card_lt_of_lt h,
strong_induction_on t ih
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf card⟩]}
theorem strong_induction_eq {p : multiset α → Sort*}
(s : multiset α) (H) : @strong_induction_on _ p s H =
H s (λ t h, @strong_induction_on _ p t H) :=
by rw [strong_induction_on]
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma case_strong_induction_on {p : multiset α → Prop}
(s : multiset α) (h₀ : p 0) (h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀t ≤ s, p t) → p (a :: s)) : p s :=
multiset.strong_induction_on s $ assume s,
multiset.induction_on s (λ _, h₀) $ λ a s _ ih, h₁ _ _ $
λ t h, ih _ $ lt_of_le_of_lt h $ lt_cons_self _ _
/- singleton -/
instance : has_singleton α (multiset α) := ⟨λ a, a::0⟩
instance : is_lawful_singleton α (multiset α) := ⟨λ a, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem singleton_eq_singleton (a : α) : singleton a = a::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ a::0 ↔ b = a := by simp
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ (a::0 : multiset α) := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : a::0 = b::0 ↔ a = b := cons_inj_left _
@[simp] theorem singleton_ne_zero (a : α) : a::0 ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (lt_cons_self _ _)
@[simp] theorem singleton_le {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a::0 ≤ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, mem_of_le h (mem_singleton_self _),
λ h, let ⟨t, e⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem h in e.symm ▸ cons_le_cons _ (zero_le _)⟩
theorem card_eq_one {s : multiset α} : card s = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = a::0 :=
⟨quot.induction_on s $ λ l h,
(list.length_eq_one.1 h).imp $ λ a, congr_arg coe,
λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
/- add -/
/-- The sum of two multisets is the lift of the list append operation.
This adds the multiplicities of each element,
i.e. `count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t`. -/
protected def add (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂, ((l₁ ++ l₂ : list α) : multiset α)) $
λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂, quot.sound $ p₁.append p₂
instance : has_add (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.add⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_add (s t : list α) : (s + t : multiset α) = (s ++ t : list α) := rfl
protected theorem add_comm (s t : multiset α) : s + t = t + s :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, quot.sound perm_append_comm
protected theorem zero_add (s : multiset α) : 0 + s = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
theorem singleton_add (a : α) (s : multiset α) : ↑[a] + s = a::s := rfl
protected theorem add_le_add_left (s) {t u : multiset α} : s + t ≤ s + u ↔ t ≤ u :=
quotient.induction_on₃ s t u $ λ l₁ l₂ l₃, subperm_append_left _
protected theorem add_left_cancel (s) {t u : multiset α} (h : s + t = s + u) : t = u :=
le_antisymm ((multiset.add_le_add_left _).1 (le_of_eq h))
((multiset.add_le_add_left _).1 (le_of_eq h.symm))
instance : ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid (multiset α) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
add_comm := multiset.add_comm,
add_assoc := λ s₁ s₂ s₃, quotient.induction_on₃ s₁ s₂ s₃ $ λ l₁ l₂ l₃,
congr_arg coe $ append_assoc l₁ l₂ l₃,
zero_add := multiset.zero_add,
add_zero := λ s, by rw [multiset.add_comm, multiset.zero_add],
add_left_cancel := multiset.add_left_cancel,
add_right_cancel := λ s₁ s₂ s₃ h, multiset.add_left_cancel s₂ $
by simpa [multiset.add_comm] using h,
add_le_add_left := λ s₁ s₂ h s₃, (multiset.add_le_add_left _).2 h,
le_of_add_le_add_left := λ s₁ s₂ s₃, (multiset.add_le_add_left _).1,
..@multiset.partial_order α }
@[simp] theorem cons_add (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : a :: s + t = a :: (s + t) :=
by rw [← singleton_add, ← singleton_add, add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem add_cons (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : s + a :: t = a :: (s + t) :=
by rw [add_comm, cons_add, add_comm]
theorem le_add_right (s t : multiset α) : s ≤ s + t :=
by simpa using add_le_add_left (zero_le t) s
theorem le_add_left (s t : multiset α) : s ≤ t + s :=
by simpa using add_le_add_right (zero_le t) s
@[simp] theorem card_add (s t : multiset α) : card (s + t) = card s + card t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t length_append
lemma card_smul (s : multiset α) (n : ℕ) :
(n •ℕ s).card = n * s.card :=
by induction n; simp [succ_nsmul, *, nat.succ_mul]; cc
@[simp] theorem mem_add {a : α} {s t : multiset α} : a ∈ s + t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, mem_append
theorem le_iff_exists_add {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∃ u, t = s + u :=
⟨λ h, le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ s,
let ⟨l, p⟩ := s.exists_perm_append in ⟨l, quot.sound p⟩,
λ⟨u, e⟩, e.symm ▸ le_add_right s u⟩
instance : canonically_ordered_add_monoid (multiset α) :=
{ lt_of_add_lt_add_left := @lt_of_add_lt_add_left _ _,
le_iff_exists_add := @le_iff_exists_add _,
bot := 0,
bot_le := multiset.zero_le,
..multiset.ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid }
/- repeat -/
/-- `repeat a n` is the multiset containing only `a` with multiplicity `n`. -/
def repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : multiset α := repeat a n
@[simp] lemma repeat_zero (a : α) : repeat a 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n+1) = a :: repeat a n := by simp [repeat]
@[simp] lemma repeat_one (a : α) : repeat a 1 = a :: 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma card_repeat : ∀ (a : α) n, card (repeat a n) = n := length_repeat
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} {n} : b ∈ repeat a n → b = a := eq_of_mem_repeat
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {s : multiset α} : s = repeat a s.card ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, iff.trans ⟨λ h,
(perm_repeat.1 $ (quotient.exact h)), congr_arg coe⟩ eq_repeat'
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : (∀ b ∈ s, b = a) → s = repeat a s.card :=
eq_repeat'.2
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {s : multiset α} : s = repeat a n ↔ card s = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨card_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_subset_singleton : ∀ (a : α) n, repeat a n ⊆ a::0 := repeat_subset_singleton
theorem repeat_le_coe {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : repeat a n ≤ l ↔ list.repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ ⟨l', p, s⟩, (perm_repeat.1 p) ▸ s, sublist.subperm⟩
/- erase -/
section erase
variables [decidable_eq α] {s t : multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `erase s a` is the multiset that subtracts 1 from the
multiplicity of `a`. -/
def erase (s : multiset α) (a : α) : multiset α :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (l.erase a : multiset α))
(λ l₁ l₂ p, quot.sound (p.erase a))
@[simp] theorem coe_erase (l : list α) (a : α) :
erase (l : multiset α) a = l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_zero (a : α) : (0 : multiset α).erase a = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (s : multiset α) : (a :: s).erase a = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ erase_cons_head a l
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (s : multiset α) (h : b ≠ a) : (b::s).erase a = b :: s.erase a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ erase_cons_tail l h
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∉ s → s.erase a = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ erase_of_not_mem h
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem cons_erase {s : multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → a :: s.erase a = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, quot.sound (perm_cons_erase h).symm
theorem le_cons_erase (s : multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a :: s.erase a :=
if h : a ∈ s then le_of_eq (cons_erase h).symm
else by rw erase_of_not_mem h; apply le_cons_self
theorem erase_add_left_pos {a : α} {s : multiset α} (t) : a ∈ s → (s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h, congr_arg coe $ erase_append_left l₂ h
theorem erase_add_right_pos {a : α} (s) {t : multiset α} (h : a ∈ t) :
(s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a :=
by rw [add_comm, erase_add_left_pos s h, add_comm]
theorem erase_add_right_neg {a : α} {s : multiset α} (t) :
a ∉ s → (s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h, congr_arg coe $ erase_append_right l₂ h
theorem erase_add_left_neg {a : α} (s) {t : multiset α} (h : a ∉ t) :
(s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t :=
by rw [add_comm, erase_add_right_neg s h, add_comm]
theorem erase_le (a : α) (s : multiset α) : s.erase a ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, (erase_sublist a l).subperm
@[simp] theorem erase_lt {a : α} {s : multiset α} : s.erase a < s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, not_imp_comm.1 erase_of_not_mem (ne_of_lt h),
λ h, by simpa [h] using lt_cons_self (s.erase a) a⟩
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : multiset α) : s.erase a ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le (erase_le a s)
theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {s : multiset α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ s.erase b ↔ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, list.mem_erase_of_ne ab
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s.erase b → a ∈ s :=
mem_of_subset (erase_subset _ _)
theorem erase_comm (s : multiset α) (a b : α) : (s.erase a).erase b = (s.erase b).erase a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ l.erase_comm a b
theorem erase_le_erase {s t : multiset α} (a : α) (h : s ≤ t) : s.erase a ≤ t.erase a :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, (h.erase _).subperm
theorem erase_le_iff_le_cons {s t : multiset α} {a : α} : s.erase a ≤ t ↔ s ≤ a :: t :=
⟨λ h, le_trans (le_cons_erase _ _) (cons_le_cons _ h),
λ h, if m : a ∈ s
then by rw ← cons_erase m at h; exact (cons_le_cons_iff _).1 h
else le_trans (erase_le _ _) ((le_cons_of_not_mem m).1 h)⟩
@[simp] theorem card_erase_of_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} :
a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) = pred (card s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, length_erase_of_mem
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) < card s :=
λ h, card_lt_of_lt (erase_lt.mpr h)
theorem card_erase_le {a : α} {s : multiset α} : card (s.erase a) ≤ card s :=
card_le_of_le (erase_le a s)
end erase
@[simp] theorem coe_reverse (l : list α) : (reverse l : multiset α) = l :=
quot.sound $ reverse_perm _
/- map -/
/-- `map f s` is the lift of the list `map` operation. The multiplicity
of `b` in `map f s` is the number of `a ∈ s` (counting multiplicity)
such that `f a = b`. -/
def map (f : α → β) (s : multiset α) : multiset β :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l : list α, (l.map f : multiset β))
(λ l₁ l₂ p, quot.sound (p.map f))
theorem forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} {s : multiset α} :
(∀ y ∈ s.map f, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
quotient.induction_on' s $ λ L, list.forall_mem_map_iff
@[simp] theorem coe_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f ↑l = l.map f := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : map f 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (a::s) = f a :: map f s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
lemma map_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ({a} : multiset α).map f = {f a} := rfl
theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (k : ℕ) : (repeat a k).map f = repeat (f a) k := by
{ induction k, simp, simpa }
@[simp] theorem map_add (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (s + t) = map f s + map f t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, congr_arg coe $ map_append _ _ _
instance (f : α → β) : is_add_monoid_hom (map f) :=
{ map_add := map_add _, map_zero := map_zero _ }
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : multiset α} :
b ∈ map f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_map
@[simp] theorem card_map (f : α → β) (s) : card (map f s) = card s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, length_map _ _
@[simp] theorem map_eq_zero {s : multiset α} {f : α → β} : s.map f = 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
by rw [← multiset.card_eq_zero, multiset.card_map, multiset.card_eq_zero]
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s :=
mem_map.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : function.injective f) {a : α} {s : multiset α} :
f a ∈ map f s ↔ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_map_of_injective H
@[simp] theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : multiset α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ list.map_map _ _ _
theorem map_id (s : multiset α) : map id s = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ map_id _
@[simp] lemma map_id' (s : multiset α) : map (λx, x) s = s := map_id s
@[simp] theorem map_const (s : multiset α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) s = repeat b s.card :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ map_const _ _
@[congr] theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} {s : multiset α} : (∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) → map f s = map g s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, congr_arg coe $ map_congr H
lemma map_hcongr {β' : Type*} {m : multiset α} {f : α → β} {f' : α → β'}
(h : β = β') (hf : ∀a∈m, f a == f' a) : map f m == map f' m :=
begin subst h, simp at hf, simp [map_congr hf] end
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) : b₁ = b₂ :=
eq_of_mem_repeat $ by rwa map_const at h
@[simp] theorem map_le_map {f : α → β} {s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : map f s ≤ map f t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, (h.map f).subperm
@[simp] theorem map_subset_map {f : α → β} {s t : multiset α} (H : s ⊆ t) : map f s ⊆ map f t :=
λ b m, let ⟨a, h, e⟩ := mem_map.1 m in mem_map.2 ⟨a, H h, e⟩
/- fold -/
/-- `foldl f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldl f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is right-commutative,
that is, `f (f b a₁) a₂ = f (f b a₂) a₁`. -/
def foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : right_commutative f) (b : β) (s : multiset α) : β :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, foldl f b l)
(λ l₁ l₂ p, p.foldl_eq H b)
@[simp] theorem foldl_zero (f : β → α → β) (H b) : foldl f H b 0 = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : β → α → β) (H b a s) : foldl f H b (a :: s) = foldl f H (f b a) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_add (f : β → α → β) (H b s t) : foldl f H b (s + t) = foldl f H (foldl f H b s) t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, foldl_append _ _ _ _
/-- `foldr f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldr f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is left-commutative,
that is, `f a₁ (f a₂ b) = f a₂ (f a₁ b)`. -/
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : left_commutative f) (b : β) (s : multiset α) : β :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, foldr f b l)
(λ l₁ l₂ p, p.foldr_eq H b)
@[simp] theorem foldr_zero (f : α → β → β) (H b) : foldr f H b 0 = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (H b a s) : foldr f H b (a :: s) = f a (foldr f H b s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_add (f : α → β → β) (H b s t) : foldr f H b (s + t) = foldr f H (foldr f H b t) s :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, foldr_append _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem coe_foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : left_commutative f) (b : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldr f b := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : right_commutative f) (b : β) (l : list α) :
foldl f H b l = l.foldl f b := rfl
theorem coe_foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : left_commutative f) (b : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldl (λ x y, f y x) b :=
(congr_arg (foldr f H b) (coe_reverse l)).symm.trans $ foldr_reverse _ _ _
theorem foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : left_commutative f) (b : β) (s : multiset α) :
foldr f H b s = foldl (λ x y, f y x) (λ x y z, (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, coe_foldr_swap _ _ _ _
theorem foldl_swap (f : β → α → β) (H : right_commutative f) (b : β) (s : multiset α) :
foldl f H b s = foldr (λ x y, f y x) (λ x y z, (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).symm
/-- Product of a multiset given a commutative monoid structure on `α`.
`prod {a, b, c} = a * b * c` -/
@[to_additive]
def prod [comm_monoid α] : multiset α → α :=
foldr (*) (λ x y z, by simp [mul_left_comm]) 1
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr [comm_monoid α] (s : multiset α) :
prod s = foldr (*) (λ x y z, by simp [mul_left_comm]) 1 s := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldl [comm_monoid α] (s : multiset α) :
prod s = foldl (*) (λ x y z, by simp [mul_right_comm]) 1 s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).trans (by simp [mul_comm])
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem coe_prod [comm_monoid α] (l : list α) : prod ↑l = l.prod :=
prod_eq_foldl _
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_zero [comm_monoid α] : @prod α _ 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_cons [comm_monoid α] (a : α) (s) : prod (a :: s) = a * prod s :=
foldr_cons _ _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton [comm_monoid α] (a : α) : prod (a :: 0) = a := by simp
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_add [comm_monoid α] (s t : multiset α) : prod (s + t) = prod s * prod t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, by simp
instance sum.is_add_monoid_hom [add_comm_monoid α] : is_add_monoid_hom (sum : multiset α → α) :=
{ map_add := sum_add, map_zero := sum_zero }
lemma prod_smul {α : Type*} [comm_monoid α] (m : multiset α) :
∀n, (n •ℕ m).prod = m.prod ^ n
| 0 := rfl
| (n + 1) :=
by rw [add_nsmul, one_nsmul, _root_.pow_add, _root_.pow_one, prod_add, prod_smul n]
@[simp] theorem prod_repeat [comm_monoid α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) : prod (multiset.repeat a n) = a ^ n :=
by simp [repeat, list.prod_repeat]
@[simp] theorem sum_repeat [add_comm_monoid α] :
∀ (a : α) (n : ℕ), sum (multiset.repeat a n) = n •ℕ a :=
@prod_repeat (multiplicative α) _
attribute [to_additive] prod_repeat
lemma prod_map_one [comm_monoid γ] {m : multiset α} :
prod (m.map (λa, (1 : γ))) = (1 : γ) :=
by simp
lemma sum_map_zero [add_comm_monoid γ] {m : multiset α} :
sum (m.map (λa, (0 : γ))) = (0 : γ) :=
by simp
attribute [to_additive] prod_map_one
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_map_mul [comm_monoid γ] {m : multiset α} {f g : α → γ} :
prod (m.map $ λa, f a * g a) = prod (m.map f) * prod (m.map g) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (assume a m ih, by simp [ih]; cc)
lemma prod_map_prod_map [comm_monoid γ] (m : multiset α) (n : multiset β) {f : α → β → γ} :
prod (m.map $ λa, prod $ n.map $ λb, f a b) = prod (n.map $ λb, prod $ m.map $ λa, f a b) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (assume a m ih, by simp [ih])
lemma sum_map_sum_map [add_comm_monoid γ] : ∀ (m : multiset α) (n : multiset β) {f : α → β → γ},
sum (m.map $ λa, sum $ n.map $ λb, f a b) = sum (n.map $ λb, sum $ m.map $ λa, f a b) :=
@prod_map_prod_map _ _ (multiplicative γ) _
attribute [to_additive] prod_map_prod_map
lemma sum_map_mul_left [semiring β] {b : β} {s : multiset α} {f : α → β} :
sum (s.map (λa, b * f a)) = b * sum (s.map f) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (assume a s ih, by simp [ih, mul_add])
lemma sum_map_mul_right [semiring β] {b : β} {s : multiset α} {f : α → β} :
sum (s.map (λa, f a * b)) = sum (s.map f) * b :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (assume a s ih, by simp [ih, add_mul])
theorem prod_ne_zero {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] {m : multiset R} :
(∀ x ∈ m, (x : _) ≠ 0) → m.prod ≠ 0 :=
multiset.induction_on m (λ _, one_ne_zero) $ λ hd tl ih H,
by { rw forall_mem_cons at H, rw prod_cons, exact mul_ne_zero H.1 (ih H.2) }
lemma prod_eq_zero {α : Type*} [comm_semiring α] {s : multiset α} (h : (0 : α) ∈ s) :
multiset.prod s = 0 :=
begin
rcases multiset.exists_cons_of_mem h with ⟨s', hs'⟩,
simp [hs', multiset.prod_cons]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_hom [comm_monoid α] [comm_monoid β] (s : multiset α) (f : α →* β) :
(s.map f).prod = f s.prod :=
quotient.induction_on s $ λ l, by simp only [l.prod_hom f, quot_mk_to_coe, coe_map, coe_prod]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel [comm_monoid β] [comm_monoid γ] (s : multiset α) {r : β → γ → Prop}
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀⦃a b c⦄, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (s.map f).prod (s.map g).prod :=
quotient.induction_on s $ λ l,
by simp only [l.prod_hom_rel h₁ h₂, quot_mk_to_coe, coe_map, coe_prod]
lemma dvd_prod [comm_monoid α] {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s → a ∣ s.prod :=
quotient.induction_on s (λ l a h, by simpa using list.dvd_prod h) a
lemma le_sum_of_subadditive [add_comm_monoid α] [ordered_add_comm_monoid β]
(f : α → β) (h_zero : f 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (s : multiset α) :
f s.sum ≤ (s.map f).sum :=
multiset.induction_on s (le_of_eq h_zero) $
assume a s ih, by rw [sum_cons, map_cons, sum_cons];
from le_trans (h_add a s.sum) (add_le_add_left ih _)
lemma abs_sum_le_sum_abs [discrete_linear_ordered_field α] {s : multiset α} :
abs s.sum ≤ (s.map abs).sum :=
le_sum_of_subadditive _ abs_zero abs_add s
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a : α} {s : multiset α} : (∀ x ∈ s, a ∣ x) → a ∣ s.sum :=
multiset.induction_on s (λ _, dvd_zero _)
(λ x s ih h, by rw sum_cons; exact dvd_add
(h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih (λ y hy, h _ (mem_cons.2 (or.inr hy)))))
/- join -/
/-- `join S`, where `S` is a multiset of multisets, is the lift of the list join
operation, that is, the union of all the sets.
join {{1, 2}, {1, 2}, {0, 1}} = {0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2} -/
def join : multiset (multiset α) → multiset α := sum
theorem coe_join : ∀ L : list (list α),
join (L.map (@coe _ (multiset α) _) : multiset (multiset α)) = L.join
| [] := rfl
| (l :: L) := congr_arg (λ s : multiset α, ↑l + s) (coe_join L)
@[simp] theorem join_zero : @join α 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem join_cons (s S) : @join α (s :: S) = s + join S :=
sum_cons _ _
@[simp] theorem join_add (S T) : @join α (S + T) = join S + join T :=
sum_add _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a S} : a ∈ @join α S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
multiset.induction_on S (by simp) $
by simp [or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib] {contextual := tt}
@[simp] theorem card_join (S) : card (@join α S) = sum (map card S) :=
multiset.induction_on S (by simp) (by simp)
/- bind -/
/-- `bind s f` is the monad bind operation, defined as `join (map f s)`.
It is the union of `f a` as `a` ranges over `s`. -/
def bind (s : multiset α) (f : α → multiset β) : multiset β :=
join (map f s)
@[simp] theorem coe_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
@bind α β l (λ a, f a) = l.bind f :=
by rw [list.bind, ← coe_join, list.map_map]; refl
@[simp] theorem zero_bind (f : α → multiset β) : bind 0 f = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_bind (a s) (f : α → multiset β) : bind (a::s) f = f a + bind s f :=
by simp [bind]
@[simp] theorem add_bind (s t) (f : α → multiset β) : bind (s + t) f = bind s f + bind t f :=
by simp [bind]
@[simp] theorem bind_zero (s : multiset α) : bind s (λa, 0 : α → multiset β) = 0 :=
by simp [bind, join]
@[simp] theorem bind_add (s : multiset α) (f g : α → multiset β) :
bind s (λa, f a + g a) = bind s f + bind s g :=
by simp [bind, join]
@[simp] theorem bind_cons (s : multiset α) (f : α → β) (g : α → multiset β) :
bind s (λa, f a :: g a) = map f s + bind s g :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm] {contextual := tt})
@[simp] theorem mem_bind {b s} {f : α → multiset β} : b ∈ bind s f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
by simp [bind]; simp [-exists_and_distrib_right, exists_and_distrib_right.symm];
rw exists_swap; simp [and_assoc]
@[simp] theorem card_bind (s) (f : α → multiset β) : card (bind s f) = sum (map (card ∘ f) s) :=
by simp [bind]
lemma bind_congr {f g : α → multiset β} {m : multiset α} : (∀a∈m, f a = g a) → bind m f = bind m g :=
by simp [bind] {contextual := tt}
lemma bind_hcongr {β' : Type*} {m : multiset α} {f : α → multiset β} {f' : α → multiset β'}
(h : β = β') (hf : ∀a∈m, f a == f' a) : bind m f == bind m f' :=
begin subst h, simp at hf, simp [bind_congr hf] end
lemma map_bind (m : multiset α) (n : α → multiset β) (f : β → γ) :
map f (bind m n) = bind m (λa, map f (n a)) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma bind_map (m : multiset α) (n : β → multiset γ) (f : α → β) :
bind (map f m) n = bind m (λa, n (f a)) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma bind_assoc {s : multiset α} {f : α → multiset β} {g : β → multiset γ} :
(s.bind f).bind g = s.bind (λa, (f a).bind g) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma bind_bind (m : multiset α) (n : multiset β) {f : α → β → multiset γ} :
(bind m $ λa, bind n $ λb, f a b) = (bind n $ λb, bind m $ λa, f a b) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma bind_map_comm (m : multiset α) (n : multiset β) {f : α → β → γ} :
(bind m $ λa, n.map $ λb, f a b) = (bind n $ λb, m.map $ λa, f a b) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_bind [comm_monoid β] (s : multiset α) (t : α → multiset β) :
prod (bind s t) = prod (s.map $ λa, prod (t a)) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (assume a s ih, by simp [ih, cons_bind])
/- product -/
/-- The multiplicity of `(a, b)` in `product s t` is
the product of the multiplicity of `a` in `s` and `b` in `t`. -/
def product (s : multiset α) (t : multiset β) : multiset (α × β) :=
s.bind $ λ a, t.map $ prod.mk a
@[simp] theorem coe_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
@product α β l₁ l₂ = l₁.product l₂ :=
by rw [product, list.product, ← coe_bind]; simp
@[simp] theorem zero_product (t) : @product α β 0 t = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_product (a : α) (s : multiset α) (t : multiset β) :
product (a :: s) t = map (prod.mk a) t + product s t :=
by simp [product]
@[simp] theorem product_singleton (a : α) (b : β) : product (a::0) (b::0) = (a,b)::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_product (s t : multiset α) (u : multiset β) :
product (s + t) u = product s u + product t u :=
by simp [product]
@[simp] theorem product_add (s : multiset α) : ∀ t u : multiset β,
product s (t + u) = product s t + product s u :=
multiset.induction_on s (λ t u, rfl) $ λ a s IH t u,
by rw [cons_product, IH]; simp; cc
@[simp] theorem mem_product {s t} : ∀ {p : α × β}, p ∈ @product α β s t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t
| (a, b) := by simp [product, and.left_comm]
@[simp] theorem card_product (s : multiset α) (t : multiset β) : card (product s t) = card s * card t :=
by simp [product, repeat, (∘), mul_comm]
/- sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
/-- `sigma s t` is the dependent version of `product`. It is the sum of
`(a, b)` as `a` ranges over `s` and `b` ranges over `t a`. -/
protected def sigma (s : multiset α) (t : Π a, multiset (σ a)) : multiset (Σ a, σ a) :=
s.bind $ λ a, (t a).map $ sigma.mk a
@[simp] theorem coe_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
@multiset.sigma α σ l₁ (λ a, l₂ a) = l₁.sigma l₂ :=
by rw [multiset.sigma, list.sigma, ← coe_bind]; simp
@[simp] theorem zero_sigma (t) : @multiset.sigma α σ 0 t = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_sigma (a : α) (s : multiset α) (t : Π a, multiset (σ a)) :
(a :: s).sigma t = map (sigma.mk a) (t a) + s.sigma t :=
by simp [multiset.sigma]
@[simp] theorem sigma_singleton (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(a::0).sigma (λ a, b a::0) = ⟨a, b a⟩::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_sigma (s t : multiset α) (u : Π a, multiset (σ a)) :
(s + t).sigma u = s.sigma u + t.sigma u :=
by simp [multiset.sigma]
@[simp] theorem sigma_add (s : multiset α) : ∀ t u : Π a, multiset (σ a),
s.sigma (λ a, t a + u a) = s.sigma t + s.sigma u :=
multiset.induction_on s (λ t u, rfl) $ λ a s IH t u,
by rw [cons_sigma, IH]; simp; cc
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {s t} : ∀ {p : Σ a, σ a},
p ∈ @multiset.sigma α σ s t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1
| ⟨a, b⟩ := by simp [multiset.sigma, and_assoc, and.left_comm]
@[simp] theorem card_sigma (s : multiset α) (t : Π a, multiset (σ a)) :
card (s.sigma t) = sum (map (λ a, card (t a)) s) :=
by simp [multiset.sigma, (∘)]
end
/- map for partial functions -/
/-- Lift of the list `pmap` operation. Map a partial function `f` over a multiset
`s` whose elements are all in the domain of `f`. -/
def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) (s : multiset α) : (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → multiset β :=
quot.rec_on s (λ l H, ↑(pmap f l H)) $ λ l₁ l₂ (pp : l₁ ~ l₂),
funext $ λ (H₂ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, p a),
have H₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a, from λ a h, H₂ a (pp.subset h),
have ∀ {s₂ e H}, @eq.rec (multiset α) l₁
(λ s, (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → multiset β) (λ _, ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁))
s₂ e H = ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁), by intros s₂ e _; subst e,
this.trans $ quot.sound $ pp.pmap f
@[simp] theorem coe_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l : list α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) : pmap f l H = l.pmap f H := rfl
@[simp] lemma pmap_zero {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) (h : ∀a∈(0:multiset α), p a) :
pmap f 0 h = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) (a : α) (m : multiset α) :
∀(h : ∀b∈a::m, p b), pmap f (a :: m) h =
f a (h a (mem_cons_self a m)) :: pmap f m (λa ha, h a $ mem_cons_of_mem ha) :=
quotient.induction_on m $ assume l h, rfl
/-- "Attach" a proof that `a ∈ s` to each element `a` in `s` to produce
a multiset on `{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : multiset α) : multiset {x // x ∈ s} := pmap subtype.mk s (λ a, id)
@[simp] theorem coe_attach (l : list α) :
@eq (multiset {x // x ∈ l}) (@attach α l) l.attach := rfl
theorem sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem [has_sizeof α] {x : α} {s : multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
sizeof x < sizeof s := by
{ induction s with l a b, exact list.sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem hx, refl }
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (s : multiset α) :
∀ H, @pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) s H = map f s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, congr_arg coe $ pmap_eq_map p f l H
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(s : multiset α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f s H₁ = pmap g s H₂ :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H₁ H₂, congr_arg coe $ pmap_congr l h) H₁ H₂
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(s) : ∀ H, map g (pmap f s H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) s H :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, congr_arg coe $ map_pmap g f l H
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(s) : ∀ H, pmap f s H = s.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, congr_arg coe $ pmap_eq_map_attach f l H
theorem attach_map_val (s : multiset α) : s.attach.map subtype.val = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ attach_map_val l
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (s : multiset α) : ∀ x, x ∈ s.attach :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_attach _
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{s H b} : b ∈ pmap f s H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ s), f a (H a h) = b :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H, mem_pmap) H
@[simp] theorem card_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(s H) : card (pmap f s H) = card s :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H, length_pmap) H
@[simp] theorem card_attach {m : multiset α} : card (attach m) = card m := card_pmap _ _ _
@[simp] lemma attach_zero : (0 : multiset α).attach = 0 := rfl
lemma attach_cons (a : α) (m : multiset α) :
(a :: m).attach = ⟨a, mem_cons_self a m⟩ :: (m.attach.map $ λp, ⟨p.1, mem_cons_of_mem p.2⟩) :=
quotient.induction_on m $ assume l, congr_arg coe $ congr_arg (list.cons _) $
by rw [list.map_pmap]; exact list.pmap_congr _ (assume a' h₁ h₂, subtype.eq rfl)
section decidable_pi_exists
variables {m : multiset α}
protected def decidable_forall_multiset {p : α → Prop} [hp : ∀a, decidable (p a)] :
decidable (∀a∈m, p a) :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton m (λl, decidable_of_iff (∀a∈l, p a) $ by simp)
instance decidable_dforall_multiset {p : Πa∈m, Prop} [hp : ∀a (h : a ∈ m), decidable (p a h)] :
decidable (∀a (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff
(@multiset.decidable_forall_multiset {a // a ∈ m} m.attach (λa, p a.1 a.2) _)
(iff.intro (assume h a ha, h ⟨a, ha⟩ (mem_attach _ _)) (assume h ⟨a, ha⟩ _, h _ _))
/-- decidable equality for functions whose domain is bounded by multisets -/
instance decidable_eq_pi_multiset {β : α → Type*} [h : ∀a, decidable_eq (β a)] :
decidable_eq (Πa∈m, β a) :=
assume f g, decidable_of_iff (∀a (h : a ∈ m), f a h = g a h) (by simp [function.funext_iff])
def decidable_exists_multiset {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
decidable (∃ x ∈ m, p x) :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton m list.decidable_exists_mem
instance decidable_dexists_multiset {p : Πa∈m, Prop} [hp : ∀a (h : a ∈ m), decidable (p a h)] :
decidable (∃a (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff
(@multiset.decidable_exists_multiset {a // a ∈ m} m.attach (λa, p a.1 a.2) _)
(iff.intro (λ ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, _, ha₂⟩, ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩)
(λ ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, mem_attach _ _, ha₂⟩))
end decidable_pi_exists
/- subtraction -/
section
variables [decidable_eq α] {s t u : multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s - t` is the multiset such that
`count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t` for all `a`. -/
protected def sub (s t : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s t (λ l₁ l₂, (l₁.diff l₂ : multiset α)) $ λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂,
quot.sound $ p₁.diff p₂
instance : has_sub (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.sub⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_sub (s t : list α) : (s - t : multiset α) = (s.diff t : list α) := rfl
theorem sub_eq_fold_erase (s t : multiset α) : s - t = foldl erase erase_comm s t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂,
show ↑(l₁.diff l₂) = foldl erase erase_comm ↑l₁ ↑l₂,
by { rw diff_eq_foldl l₁ l₂, symmetry, exact foldl_hom _ _ _ _ _ (λ x y, rfl) }
@[simp] theorem sub_zero (s : multiset α) : s - 0 = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_cons (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : s - a::t = s.erase a - t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, congr_arg coe $ diff_cons _ _ _
theorem add_sub_of_le (h : s ≤ t) : s + (t - s) = t :=
begin
revert t,
refine multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (λ a s IH t h, _),
have := cons_erase (mem_of_le h (mem_cons_self _ _)),
rw [cons_add, sub_cons, IH, this],
exact (cons_le_cons_iff a).1 (this.symm ▸ h)
end
theorem sub_add' : s - (t + u) = s - t - u :=
quotient.induction_on₃ s t u $
λ l₁ l₂ l₃, congr_arg coe $ diff_append _ _ _
theorem sub_add_cancel (h : t ≤ s) : s - t + t = s :=
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_of_le h]
@[simp] theorem add_sub_cancel_left (s : multiset α) : ∀ t, s + t - s = t :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(λ a s IH t, by rw [cons_add, sub_cons, erase_cons_head, IH])
@[simp] theorem add_sub_cancel (s t : multiset α) : s + t - t = s :=
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_cancel_left]
theorem sub_le_sub_right (h : s ≤ t) (u) : s - u ≤ t - u :=
by revert s t h; exact
multiset.induction_on u (by simp {contextual := tt})
(λ a u IH s t h, by simp [IH, erase_le_erase a h])
theorem sub_le_sub_left (h : s ≤ t) : ∀ u, u - t ≤ u - s :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, begin
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH; intro u,
{ refl },
{ rw [← cons_coe, sub_cons],
exact le_trans (sub_le_sub_right (erase_le _ _) _) (IH u) },
{ rw [← cons_coe, sub_cons, ← cons_coe, sub_cons],
exact IH _ }
end
theorem sub_le_iff_le_add : s - t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u + t :=
by revert s; exact
multiset.induction_on t (by simp)
(λ a t IH s, by simp [IH, erase_le_iff_le_cons])
theorem le_sub_add (s t : multiset α) : s ≤ s - t + t :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.1 (le_refl _)
theorem sub_le_self (s t : multiset α) : s - t ≤ s :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_add_right _ _)
@[simp] theorem card_sub {s t : multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) : card (s - t) = card s - card t :=
(nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add $ by rw [add_comm, ← card_add, sub_add_cancel h]).symm
/- union -/
/-- `s ∪ t` is the lattice join operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∪ t` is the maximum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def union (s t : multiset α) : multiset α := s - t + t
instance : has_union (multiset α) := ⟨union⟩
theorem union_def (s t : multiset α) : s ∪ t = s - t + t := rfl
theorem le_union_left (s t : multiset α) : s ≤ s ∪ t := le_sub_add _ _
theorem le_union_right (s t : multiset α) : t ≤ s ∪ t := le_add_left _ _
theorem eq_union_left : t ≤ s → s ∪ t = s := sub_add_cancel
theorem union_le_union_right (h : s ≤ t) (u) : s ∪ u ≤ t ∪ u :=
add_le_add_right (sub_le_sub_right h _) u
theorem union_le (h₁ : s ≤ u) (h₂ : t ≤ u) : s ∪ t ≤ u :=
by rw ← eq_union_left h₂; exact union_le_union_right h₁ t
@[simp] theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
⟨λ h, (mem_add.1 h).imp_left (mem_of_le $ sub_le_self _ _),
or.rec (mem_of_le $ le_union_left _ _) (mem_of_le $ le_union_right _ _)⟩
@[simp] theorem map_union [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : function.injective f) {s t : multiset α} :
map f (s ∪ t) = map f s ∪ map f t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂,
congr_arg coe (by rw [list.map_append f, list.map_diff finj])
/- inter -/
/-- `s ∩ t` is the lattice meet operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∩ t` is the minimum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def inter (s t : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s t (λ l₁ l₂, (l₁.bag_inter l₂ : multiset α)) $ λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂,
quot.sound $ p₁.bag_inter p₂
instance : has_inter (multiset α) := ⟨inter⟩
@[simp] theorem inter_zero (s : multiset α) : s ∩ 0 = 0 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe l.bag_inter_nil
@[simp] theorem zero_inter (s : multiset α) : 0 ∩ s = 0 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe l.nil_bag_inter
@[simp] theorem cons_inter_of_pos {a} (s : multiset α) {t} :
a ∈ t → (a :: s) ∩ t = a :: s ∩ t.erase a :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h,
congr_arg coe $ cons_bag_inter_of_pos _ h
@[simp] theorem cons_inter_of_neg {a} (s : multiset α) {t} :
a ∉ t → (a :: s) ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h,
congr_arg coe $ cons_bag_inter_of_neg _ h
theorem inter_le_left (s t : multiset α) : s ∩ t ≤ s :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂,
(bag_inter_sublist_left _ _).subperm
theorem inter_le_right (s : multiset α) : ∀ t, s ∩ t ≤ t :=
multiset.induction_on s (λ t, (zero_inter t).symm ▸ zero_le _) $
λ a s IH t, if h : a ∈ t
then by simpa [h] using cons_le_cons a (IH (t.erase a))
else by simp [h, IH]
theorem le_inter (h₁ : s ≤ t) (h₂ : s ≤ u) : s ≤ t ∩ u :=
begin
revert s u, refine multiset.induction_on t _ (λ a t IH, _); intros,
{ simp [h₁] },
by_cases a ∈ u,
{ rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, ← erase_le_iff_le_cons],
exact IH (erase_le_iff_le_cons.2 h₁) (erase_le_erase _ h₂) },
{ rw cons_inter_of_neg _ h,
exact IH ((le_cons_of_not_mem $ mt (mem_of_le h₂) h).1 h₁) h₂ }
end
@[simp] theorem mem_inter : a ∈ s ∩ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h, mem_of_le (inter_le_right _ _) h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, by rw [← cons_erase h₁, cons_inter_of_pos _ h₂]; apply mem_cons_self⟩
instance : lattice (multiset α) :=
{ sup := (∪),
sup_le := @union_le _ _,
le_sup_left := le_union_left,
le_sup_right := le_union_right,
inf := (∩),
le_inf := @le_inter _ _,
inf_le_left := inter_le_left,
inf_le_right := inter_le_right,
..@multiset.partial_order α }
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_union (s t : multiset α) : s ⊔ t = s ∪ t := rfl
@[simp] theorem inf_eq_inter (s t : multiset α) : s ⊓ t = s ∩ t := rfl
@[simp] theorem le_inter_iff : s ≤ t ∩ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u := le_inf_iff
@[simp] theorem union_le_iff : s ∪ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u := sup_le_iff
instance : semilattice_inf_bot (multiset α) :=
{ bot := 0, bot_le := zero_le, ..multiset.lattice }
theorem union_comm (s t : multiset α) : s ∪ t = t ∪ s := sup_comm
theorem inter_comm (s t : multiset α) : s ∩ t = t ∩ s := inf_comm
theorem eq_union_right (h : s ≤ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
by rw [union_comm, eq_union_left h]
theorem union_le_union_left (h : s ≤ t) (u) : u ∪ s ≤ u ∪ t :=
sup_le_sup_left h _
theorem union_le_add (s t : multiset α) : s ∪ t ≤ s + t :=
union_le (le_add_right _ _) (le_add_left _ _)
theorem union_add_distrib (s t u : multiset α) : (s ∪ t) + u = (s + u) ∪ (t + u) :=
by simpa [(∪), union, eq_comm, add_assoc] using show s + u - (t + u) = s - t,
by rw [add_comm t, sub_add', add_sub_cancel]
theorem add_union_distrib (s t u : multiset α) : s + (t ∪ u) = (s + t) ∪ (s + u) :=
by rw [add_comm, union_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
theorem cons_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : a :: (s ∪ t) = (a :: s) ∪ (a :: t) :=
by simpa using add_union_distrib (a::0) s t
theorem inter_add_distrib (s t u : multiset α) : (s ∩ t) + u = (s + u) ∩ (t + u) :=
begin
by_contra h,
cases lt_iff_cons_le.1 (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_inter
(add_le_add_right (inter_le_left s t) u)
(add_le_add_right (inter_le_right s t) u)) h) with a hl,
rw ← cons_add at hl,
exact not_le_of_lt (lt_cons_self (s ∩ t) a) (le_inter
(le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_left _ _)))
(le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_right _ _))))
end
theorem add_inter_distrib (s t u : multiset α) : s + (t ∩ u) = (s + t) ∩ (s + u) :=
by rw [add_comm, inter_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
theorem cons_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : a :: (s ∩ t) = (a :: s) ∩ (a :: t) :=
by simp
theorem union_add_inter (s t : multiset α) : s ∪ t + s ∩ t = s + t :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw union_add_distrib,
refine union_le (add_le_add_left (inter_le_right _ _) _) _,
rw add_comm, exact add_le_add_right (inter_le_left _ _) _ },
{ rw [add_comm, add_inter_distrib],
refine le_inter (add_le_add_right (le_union_right _ _) _) _,
rw add_comm, exact add_le_add_right (le_union_left _ _) _ }
end
theorem sub_add_inter (s t : multiset α) : s - t + s ∩ t = s :=
begin
rw [inter_comm],
revert s, refine multiset.induction_on t (by simp) (λ a t IH s, _),
by_cases a ∈ s,
{ rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, sub_cons, add_cons, IH, cons_erase h] },
{ rw [cons_inter_of_neg _ h, sub_cons, erase_of_not_mem h, IH] }
end
theorem sub_inter (s t : multiset α) : s - (s ∩ t) = s - t :=
add_right_cancel $
by rw [sub_add_inter s t, sub_add_cancel (inter_le_left _ _)]
end
/- filter -/
section
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
/-- `filter p s` returns the elements in `s` (with the same multiplicities)
which satisfy `p`, and removes the rest. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] (s : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (filter p l : multiset α))
(λ l₁ l₂ h, quot.sound $ h.filter p)
@[simp] theorem coe_filter (p : α → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p]
(l : list α) : filter p (↑l) = l.filter p := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_zero (p : α → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] : filter p 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → filter p (a::s) = a :: filter p s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ filter_cons_of_pos l h
@[simp] theorem filter_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬ p a → filter p (a::s) = filter p s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, @congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ filter_cons_of_neg l h
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
{s : multiset α} : (∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x) → filter p s = filter q s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ filter_congr h
@[simp] theorem filter_add (s t : multiset α) :
filter p (s + t) = filter p s + filter p t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, congr_arg coe $ filter_append _ _
@[simp] theorem filter_le (s : multiset α) : filter p s ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, (filter_sublist _).subperm
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (s : multiset α) : filter p s ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le $ filter_le _
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {s} : a ∈ filter p s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ p a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_filter
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : p a :=
(mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : a ∈ s :=
(mem_filter.1 h).1
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (m : a ∈ l) (h : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨m, h⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {s} : filter p s = s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, iff.trans ⟨λ h,
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq (filter_sublist _) (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h),
congr_arg coe⟩ filter_eq_self
theorem filter_eq_nil {s} : filter p s = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ¬p a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, iff.trans ⟨λ h,
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h),
congr_arg coe⟩ filter_eq_nil
theorem filter_le_filter {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : filter p s ≤ filter p t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, (filter_sublist_filter h).subperm
theorem le_filter {s t} : s ≤ filter p t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨le_trans h (filter_le _), λ a m, of_mem_filter (mem_of_le h m)⟩,
λ ⟨h, al⟩, filter_eq_self.2 al ▸ filter_le_filter h⟩
@[simp] theorem filter_sub [decidable_eq α] (s t : multiset α) :
filter p (s - t) = filter p s - filter p t :=
begin
revert s, refine multiset.induction_on t (by simp) (λ a t IH s, _),
rw [sub_cons, IH],
by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, sub_cons], congr,
by_cases m : a ∈ s,
{ rw [← cons_inj_right a, ← filter_cons_of_pos _ h,
cons_erase (mem_filter_of_mem m h), cons_erase m] },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem m, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_filter m)] } },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
by_cases m : a ∈ s,
{ rw [(by rw filter_cons_of_neg _ h : filter p (erase s a) = filter p (a :: erase s a)),
cons_erase m] },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem m] } }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_union [decidable_eq α] (s t : multiset α) :
filter p (s ∪ t) = filter p s ∪ filter p t :=
by simp [(∪), union]
@[simp] theorem filter_inter [decidable_eq α] (s t : multiset α) :
filter p (s ∩ t) = filter p s ∩ filter p t :=
le_antisymm (le_inter
(filter_le_filter $ inter_le_left _ _)
(filter_le_filter $ inter_le_right _ _)) $ le_filter.2
⟨inf_le_inf (filter_le _) (filter_le _),
λ a h, of_mem_filter (mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h)⟩
@[simp] theorem filter_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (s : multiset α) :
filter p (filter q s) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_filter l
theorem filter_add_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (s : multiset α) :
filter p s + filter q s = filter (λ a, p a ∨ q a) s + filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) s :=
multiset.induction_on s rfl $ λ a s IH,
by by_cases p a; by_cases q a; simp *
theorem filter_add_not (s : multiset α) :
filter p s + filter (λ a, ¬ p a) s = s :=
by rw [filter_add_filter, filter_eq_self.2, filter_eq_nil.2]; simp [decidable.em]
/- filter_map -/
/-- `filter_map f s` is a combination filter/map operation on `s`.
The function `f : α → option β` is applied to each element of `s`;
if `f a` is `some b` then `b` is added to the result, otherwise
`a` is removed from the resulting multiset. -/
def filter_map (f : α → option β) (s : multiset α) : multiset β :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (filter_map f l : multiset β))
(λ l₁ l₂ h, quot.sound $ h.filter_map f)
@[simp] theorem coe_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f l = l.filter_map f := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_zero (f : α → option β) : filter_map f 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (s : multiset α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: s) = filter_map f s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, @congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ filter_map_cons_none a l h
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (s : multiset α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: s) = b :: filter_map f s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, @congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ filter_map_cons_some f a l h
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
funext $ λ s, quot.induction_on s $ λ l,
@congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ congr_fun (filter_map_eq_map f) l
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
funext $ λ s, quot.induction_on s $ λ l,
@congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ congr_fun (filter_map_eq_filter p) l
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (s : multiset α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f s) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_map_filter_map f g l
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (s : multiset α) :
map g (filter_map f s) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ map_filter_map f g l
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (s : multiset α) :
filter_map g (map f s) = filter_map (g ∘ f) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_map_map f g l
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : multiset α) :
filter p (filter_map f s) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_filter_map f p l
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (s : multiset α) :
filter_map f (filter p s) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_map_filter p f l
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (s : multiset α) : filter_map some s = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_map_some l
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (s : multiset α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = some b :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_filter_map f l
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (s : multiset α) :
map g (filter_map f s) = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ map_filter_map_of_inv f g H l
theorem filter_map_le_filter_map (f : α → option β) {s t : multiset α}
(h : s ≤ t) : filter_map f s ≤ filter_map f t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, (h.filter_map _).subperm
/-! ### countp -/
/-- `countp p s` counts the number of elements of `s` (with multiplicity) that
satisfy `p`. -/
def countp (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : multiset α) : ℕ :=
quot.lift_on s (countp p) (λ l₁ l₂, perm.countp_eq p)
@[simp] theorem coe_countp (l : list α) : countp p l = l.countp p := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_zero (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : countp p 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → countp p (a::s) = countp p s + 1 :=
quot.induction_on s countp_cons_of_pos
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬ p a → countp p (a::s) = countp p s :=
quot.induction_on s countp_cons_of_neg
theorem countp_eq_card_filter (s) : countp p s = card (filter p s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, countp_eq_length_filter _
@[simp] theorem countp_add (s t) : countp p (s + t) = countp p s + countp p t :=
by simp [countp_eq_card_filter]
instance countp.is_add_monoid_hom : is_add_monoid_hom (countp p : multiset α → ℕ) :=
{ map_add := countp_add, map_zero := countp_zero _ }
theorem countp_pos {s} : 0 < countp p s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p a :=
by simp [countp_eq_card_filter, card_pos_iff_exists_mem]
@[simp] theorem countp_sub [decidable_eq α] {s t : multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) :
countp p (s - t) = countp p s - countp p t :=
by simp [countp_eq_card_filter, h, filter_le_filter]
theorem countp_pos_of_mem {s a} (h : a ∈ s) (pa : p a) : 0 < countp p s :=
countp_pos.2 ⟨_, h, pa⟩
theorem countp_le_of_le {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : countp p s ≤ countp p t :=
by simpa [countp_eq_card_filter] using card_le_of_le (filter_le_filter h)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (s : multiset α) :
countp p (filter q s) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) s :=
by simp [countp_eq_card_filter]
end
/- count -/
section
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `count a s` is the multiplicity of `a` in `s`. -/
def count (a : α) : multiset α → ℕ := countp (eq a)
@[simp] theorem coe_count (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (↑l) = l.count a := coe_countp _
@[simp] theorem count_zero (a : α) : count a 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (s : multiset α) : count a (a::s) = succ (count a s) :=
countp_cons_of_pos _ rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (s : multiset α) : count a (b::s) = count a s :=
countp_cons_of_neg _ h
theorem count_le_of_le (a : α) {s t} : s ≤ t → count a s ≤ count a t :=
countp_le_of_le
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (s : multiset α) : count a s ≤ count a (b :: s) :=
count_le_of_le _ (le_cons_self _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a (a::0) = 1 :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem count_add (a : α) : ∀ s t, count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t :=
countp_add
instance count.is_add_monoid_hom (a : α) : is_add_monoid_hom (count a : multiset α → ℕ) :=
countp.is_add_monoid_hom
@[simp] theorem count_smul (a : α) (n s) : count a (n •ℕ s) = n * count a s :=
by induction n; simp [*, succ_nsmul', succ_mul]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {s : multiset α} : 0 < count a s ↔ a ∈ s :=
by simp [count, countp_pos]
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} (h : a ∉ s) : count a s = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem count_eq_zero {a : α} {s : multiset α} : count a s = 0 ↔ a ∉ s :=
iff_not_comm.1 $ count_pos.symm.trans pos_iff_ne_zero
theorem count_ne_zero {a : α} {s : multiset α} : count a s ≠ 0 ↔ a ∈ s :=
by simp [ne.def, count_eq_zero]
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by simp [repeat]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) (s : multiset α) : count a (erase s a) = pred (count a s) :=
begin
by_cases a ∈ s,
{ rw [(by rw cons_erase h : count a s = count a (a::erase s a)),
count_cons_self]; refl },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem h, count_eq_zero.2 h]; refl }
end
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) (s : multiset α) : count a (erase s b) = count a s :=
begin
by_cases b ∈ s,
{ rw [← count_cons_of_ne ab, cons_erase h] },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem h] }
end
@[simp] theorem count_sub (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t :=
begin
revert s, refine multiset.induction_on t (by simp) (λ b t IH s, _),
rw [sub_cons, IH],
by_cases ab : a = b,
{ subst b, rw [count_erase_self, count_cons_self, sub_succ, pred_sub] },
{ rw [count_erase_of_ne ab, count_cons_of_ne ab] }
end
@[simp] theorem count_union (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : count a (s ∪ t) = max (count a s) (count a t) :=
by simp [(∪), union, sub_add_eq_max, -add_comm]
@[simp] theorem count_inter (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : count a (s ∩ t) = min (count a s) (count a t) :=
begin
apply @nat.add_left_cancel (count a (s - t)),
rw [← count_add, sub_add_inter, count_sub, sub_add_min],
end
lemma count_sum {m : multiset β} {f : β → multiset α} {a : α} :
count a (map f m).sum = sum (m.map $ λb, count a $ f b) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) ( by simp)
lemma count_bind {m : multiset β} {f : β → multiset α} {a : α} :
count a (bind m f) = sum (m.map $ λb, count a $ f b) := count_sum
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_le {a : α} {s : multiset α} {n : ℕ} : n ≤ count a s ↔ repeat a n ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, le_count_iff_repeat_sublist.trans repeat_le_coe.symm
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {s : multiset α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p s) = count a s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, count_filter h
theorem ext {s t : multiset α} : s = t ↔ ∀ a, count a s = count a t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, quotient.eq.trans perm_iff_count
@[ext]
theorem ext' {s t : multiset α} : (∀ a, count a s = count a t) → s = t :=
ext.2
@[simp] theorem coe_inter (s t : list α) : (s ∩ t : multiset α) = (s.bag_inter t : list α) :=
by ext; simp
theorem le_iff_count {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∀ a, count a s ≤ count a t :=
⟨λ h a, count_le_of_le a h, λ al,
by rw ← (ext.2 (λ a, by simp [max_eq_right (al a)]) : s ∪ t = t);
apply le_union_left⟩
instance : distrib_lattice (multiset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := λ s t u, le_of_eq $ eq.symm $
ext.2 $ λ a, by simp only [max_min_distrib_left,
multiset.count_inter, multiset.sup_eq_union, multiset.count_union, multiset.inf_eq_inter],
..multiset.lattice }
instance : semilattice_sup_bot (multiset α) :=
{ bot := 0,
bot_le := zero_le,
..multiset.lattice }
end
/- relator -/
section rel
/-- `rel r s t` -- lift the relation `r` between two elements to a relation between `s` and `t`,
s.t. there is a one-to-one mapping betweem elements in `s` and `t` following `r`. -/
inductive rel (r : α → β → Prop) : multiset α → multiset β → Prop
| zero : rel 0 0
| cons {a b as bs} : r a b → rel as bs → rel (a :: as) (b :: bs)
mk_iff_of_inductive_prop multiset.rel multiset.rel_iff
variables {δ : Type*} {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop}
private lemma rel_flip_aux {s t} (h : rel r s t) : rel (flip r) t s :=
rel.rec_on h rel.zero (assume _ _ _ _ h₀ h₁ ih, rel.cons h₀ ih)
lemma rel_flip {s t} : rel (flip r) s t ↔ rel r t s :=
⟨rel_flip_aux, rel_flip_aux⟩
lemma rel_eq_refl {s : multiset α} : rel (=) s s :=
multiset.induction_on s rel.zero (assume a s, rel.cons rfl)
lemma rel_eq {s t : multiset α} : rel (=) s t ↔ s = t :=
begin
split,
{ assume h, induction h; simp * },
{ assume h, subst h, exact rel_eq_refl }
end
lemma rel.mono {p : α → β → Prop} {s t} (h : ∀a b, r a b → p a b) (hst : rel r s t) : rel p s t :=
begin
induction hst,
case rel.zero { exact rel.zero },
case rel.cons : a b s t hab hst ih { exact ih.cons (h a b hab) }
end
lemma rel.add {s t u v} (hst : rel r s t) (huv : rel r u v) : rel r (s + u) (t + v) :=
begin
induction hst,
case rel.zero { simpa using huv },
case rel.cons : a b s t hab hst ih { simpa using ih.cons hab }
end
lemma rel_flip_eq {s t : multiset α} : rel (λa b, b = a) s t ↔ s = t :=
show rel (flip (=)) s t ↔ s = t, by rw [rel_flip, rel_eq, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma rel_zero_left {b : multiset β} : rel r 0 b ↔ b = 0 :=
by rw [rel_iff]; simp
@[simp] lemma rel_zero_right {a : multiset α} : rel r a 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by rw [rel_iff]; simp
lemma rel_cons_left {a as bs} :
rel r (a :: as) bs ↔ (∃b bs', r a b ∧ rel r as bs' ∧ bs = b :: bs') :=
begin
split,
{ generalize hm : a :: as = m,
assume h,
induction h generalizing as,
case rel.zero { simp at hm, contradiction },
case rel.cons : a' b as' bs ha'b h ih {
rcases cons_eq_cons.1 hm with ⟨eq₁, eq₂⟩ | ⟨h, cs, eq₁, eq₂⟩,
{ subst eq₁, subst eq₂, exact ⟨b, bs, ha'b, h, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih eq₂.symm with ⟨b', bs', h₁, h₂, eq⟩,
exact ⟨b', b::bs', h₁, eq₁.symm ▸ rel.cons ha'b h₂, eq.symm ▸ cons_swap _ _ _⟩ }
} },
{ exact assume ⟨b, bs', hab, h, eq⟩, eq.symm ▸ rel.cons hab h }
end
lemma rel_cons_right {as b bs} :
rel r as (b :: bs) ↔ (∃a as', r a b ∧ rel r as' bs ∧ as = a :: as') :=
begin
rw [← rel_flip, rel_cons_left],
apply exists_congr, assume a,
apply exists_congr, assume as',
rw [rel_flip, flip]
end
lemma rel_add_left {as₀ as₁} :
∀{bs}, rel r (as₀ + as₁) bs ↔ (∃bs₀ bs₁, rel r as₀ bs₀ ∧ rel r as₁ bs₁ ∧ bs = bs₀ + bs₁) :=
multiset.induction_on as₀ (by simp)
begin
assume a s ih bs,
simp only [ih, cons_add, rel_cons_left],
split,
{ assume h,
rcases h with ⟨b, bs', hab, h, rfl⟩,
rcases h with ⟨bs₀, bs₁, h₀, h₁, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b :: bs₀, bs₁, ⟨b, bs₀, hab, h₀, rfl⟩, h₁, by simp⟩ },
{ assume h,
rcases h with ⟨bs₀, bs₁, h, h₁, rfl⟩,
rcases h with ⟨b, bs, hab, h₀, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b, bs + bs₁, hab, ⟨bs, bs₁, h₀, h₁, rfl⟩, by simp⟩ }
end
lemma rel_add_right {as bs₀ bs₁} :
rel r as (bs₀ + bs₁) ↔ (∃as₀ as₁, rel r as₀ bs₀ ∧ rel r as₁ bs₁ ∧ as = as₀ + as₁) :=
by rw [← rel_flip, rel_add_left]; simp [rel_flip]
lemma rel_map_left {s : multiset γ} {f : γ → α} :
∀{t}, rel r (s.map f) t ↔ rel (λa b, r (f a) b) s t :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [rel_cons_left] {contextual := tt})
lemma rel_map_right {s : multiset α} {t : multiset γ} {f : γ → β} :
rel r s (t.map f) ↔ rel (λa b, r a (f b)) s t :=
by rw [← rel_flip, rel_map_left, ← rel_flip]; refl
lemma rel_join {s t} (h : rel (rel r) s t) : rel r s.join t.join :=
begin
induction h,
case rel.zero { simp },
case rel.cons : a b s t hab hst ih { simpa using hab.add ih }
end
lemma rel_map {p : γ → δ → Prop} {s t} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} (h : (r ⇒ p) f g) (hst : rel r s t) :
rel p (s.map f) (t.map g) :=
by rw [rel_map_left, rel_map_right]; exact hst.mono h
lemma rel_bind {p : γ → δ → Prop} {s t} {f : α → multiset γ} {g : β → multiset δ}
(h : (r ⇒ rel p) f g) (hst : rel r s t) :
rel p (s.bind f) (t.bind g) :=
by apply rel_join; apply rel_map; assumption
lemma card_eq_card_of_rel {r : α → β → Prop} {s : multiset α} {t : multiset β} (h : rel r s t) :
card s = card t :=
by induction h; simp [*]
lemma exists_mem_of_rel_of_mem {r : α → β → Prop} {s : multiset α} {t : multiset β} (h : rel r s t) :
∀ {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s), ∃ b ∈ t, r a b :=
begin
induction h with x y s t hxy hst ih,
{ simp },
{ assume a ha,
cases mem_cons.1 ha with ha ha,
{ exact ⟨y, mem_cons_self _ _, ha.symm ▸ hxy⟩ },
{ rcases ih ha with ⟨b, hbt, hab⟩,
exact ⟨b, mem_cons.2 (or.inr hbt), hab⟩ } }
end
end rel
section map
theorem map_eq_map {f : α → β} (hf : function.injective f) {s t : multiset α} :
s.map f = t.map f ↔ s = t :=
by rw [← rel_eq, ← rel_eq, rel_map_left, rel_map_right]; simp [hf.eq_iff]
theorem map_injective {f : α → β} (hf : function.injective f) :
function.injective (multiset.map f) :=
assume x y, (map_eq_map hf).1
end map
section quot
theorem map_mk_eq_map_mk_of_rel {r : α → α → Prop} {s t : multiset α} (hst : s.rel r t) :
s.map (quot.mk r) = t.map (quot.mk r) :=
rel.rec_on hst rfl $ assume a b s t hab hst ih, by simp [ih, quot.sound hab]
theorem exists_multiset_eq_map_quot_mk {r : α → α → Prop} (s : multiset (quot r)) :
∃t:multiset α, s = t.map (quot.mk r) :=
multiset.induction_on s ⟨0, rfl⟩ $
assume a s ⟨t, ht⟩, quot.induction_on a $ assume a, ht.symm ▸ ⟨a::t, (map_cons _ _ _).symm⟩
theorem induction_on_multiset_quot
{r : α → α → Prop} {p : multiset (quot r) → Prop} (s : multiset (quot r)) :
(∀s:multiset α, p (s.map (quot.mk r))) → p s :=
match s, exists_multiset_eq_map_quot_mk s with _, ⟨t, rfl⟩ := assume h, h _ end
end quot
/- disjoint -/
/-- `disjoint s t` means that `s` and `t` have no elements in common. -/
def disjoint (s t : multiset α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t → false
@[simp] theorem coe_disjoint (l₁ l₂ : list α) : @disjoint α l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁.disjoint l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint.symm {s t : multiset α} (d : disjoint s t) : disjoint t s
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm {s t : multiset α} : disjoint s t ↔ disjoint t s :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {s t : multiset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ s → a ∉ t := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {s t : multiset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ t → a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {s t : multiset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b :=
by simp [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {s t u : multiset α} (h : s ⊆ u) (d : disjoint u t) : disjoint s t
| x m₁ := d (h m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {s t u : multiset α} (h : t ⊆ u) (d : disjoint s u) : disjoint s t
| x m m₁ := d m (h m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_le_left {s t u : multiset α} (h : s ≤ u) : disjoint u t → disjoint s t :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (subset_of_le h)
theorem disjoint_of_le_right {s t u : multiset α} (h : t ≤ u) : disjoint s u → disjoint s t :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (subset_of_le h)
@[simp] theorem zero_disjoint (l : multiset α) : disjoint 0 l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp, priority 1100]
theorem singleton_disjoint {l : multiset α} {a : α} : disjoint (a::0) l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp [disjoint]; refl
@[simp, priority 1100]
theorem disjoint_singleton {l : multiset α} {a : α} : disjoint l (a::0) ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp
@[simp] theorem disjoint_add_left {s t u : multiset α} :
disjoint (s + t) u ↔ disjoint s u ∧ disjoint t u :=
by simp [disjoint, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_add_right {s t u : multiset α} :
disjoint s (t + u) ↔ disjoint s t ∧ disjoint s u :=
by rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_add_left]; tauto
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {s t : multiset α} :
disjoint (a::s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ disjoint s t :=
(@disjoint_add_left _ (a::0) s t).trans $ by simp
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {s t : multiset α} :
disjoint s (a::t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ disjoint s t :=
by rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]; tauto
theorem inter_eq_zero_iff_disjoint [decidable_eq α] {s t : multiset α} : s ∩ t = 0 ↔ disjoint s t :=
by rw ← subset_zero; simp [subset_iff, disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_left [decidable_eq α] {s t u : multiset α} :
disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ disjoint s u ∧ disjoint t u :=
by simp [disjoint, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_right [decidable_eq α] {s t u : multiset α} :
disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ disjoint s t ∧ disjoint s u :=
by simp [disjoint, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
lemma disjoint_map_map {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {s : multiset α} {t : multiset β} :
disjoint (s.map f) (t.map g) ↔ (∀a∈s, ∀b∈t, f a ≠ g b) :=
begin
simp [disjoint],
split,
from assume h a ha b hb eq, h _ ha rfl _ hb eq.symm,
from assume h c a ha eq₁ b hb eq₂, h _ ha _ hb (eq₂.symm ▸ eq₁)
end
/-- `pairwise r m` states that there exists a list of the elements s.t. `r` holds pairwise on this list. -/
def pairwise (r : α → α → Prop) (m : multiset α) : Prop :=
∃l:list α, m = l ∧ l.pairwise r
lemma pairwise_coe_iff_pairwise {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : symmetric r) {l : list α} :
multiset.pairwise r l ↔ l.pairwise r :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨l', eq, h⟩, ((quotient.exact eq).pairwise_iff hr).2 h)
(assume h, ⟨l, rfl, h⟩)
end multiset
namespace multiset
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose_x : Π hp : (∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a), { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
quotient.rec_on l (λ l' ex_unique, list.choose_x p l' (exists_of_exists_unique ex_unique)) begin
intros,
funext hp,
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y,
{ apply all_equal },
{ rintros ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩,
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨z_mem_l, pz⟩, z_unique⟩,
congr,
calc x = z : z_unique x px
... = y : (z_unique y py).symm }
end
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α := choose_x p l hp
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
variable (α)
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingleton_equiv [subsingleton α] : list α ≃ multiset α :=
{ to_fun := coe,
inv_fun := quot.lift id $ λ (a b : list α) (h : a ~ b),
list.ext_le h.length_eq $ λ n h₁ h₂, subsingleton.elim _ _,
left_inv := λ l, rfl,
right_inv := λ m, quot.induction_on m $ λ l, rfl }
end multiset
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.map_multiset_prod [comm_monoid α] [comm_monoid β] (f : α →* β) (s : multiset α) :
f s.prod = (s.map f).prod :=
(s.prod_hom f).symm
|
ca1ce9c64563881832e8711bee78f54c330e4ed9 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/category_theory/epi_mono.lean | 323fd5115033fafd3ebff681a34518d02b53aa82 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,864 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Scott Morrison
Facts about epimorphisms and monomorphisms.
The definitions of `epi` and `mono` are in `category_theory.category`,
since they are used by some lemmas for `iso`, which is used everywhere.
-/
import category_theory.adjunction.basic
import category_theory.opposites
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
section
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
lemma left_adjoint_preserves_epi {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G)
{X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : epi f) : epi (F.map f) :=
begin
constructor,
intros Z g h H,
replace H := congr_arg (adj.hom_equiv X Z) H,
rwa [adj.hom_equiv_naturality_left, adj.hom_equiv_naturality_left,
cancel_epi, equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq] at H
end
lemma right_adjoint_preserves_mono {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G)
{X Y : D} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : mono f) : mono (G.map f) :=
begin
constructor,
intros Z g h H,
replace H := congr_arg (adj.hom_equiv Z Y).symm H,
rwa [adj.hom_equiv_naturality_right_symm, adj.hom_equiv_naturality_right_symm,
cancel_mono, equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq] at H
end
lemma faithful_reflects_epi (F : C ⥤ D) [faithful F] {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(hf : epi (F.map f)) : epi f :=
⟨λ Z g h H, F.injectivity $
by rw [←cancel_epi (F.map f), ←F.map_comp, ←F.map_comp, H]⟩
lemma faithful_reflects_mono (F : C ⥤ D) [faithful F] {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(hf : mono (F.map f)) : mono f :=
⟨λ Z g h H, F.injectivity $
by rw [←cancel_mono (F.map f), ←F.map_comp, ←F.map_comp, H]⟩
end
/--
A split monomorphism is a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` admitting a retraction `retraction f : Y ⟶ X`
such that `f ≫ retraction f = 𝟙 X`.
Every split monomorphism is a monomorphism.
-/
class split_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(retraction : Y ⟶ X)
(id' : f ≫ retraction = 𝟙 X . obviously)
/--
A split epimorphism is a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` admitting a section `section_ f : Y ⟶ X`
such that `section_ f ≫ f = 𝟙 Y`.
(Note that `section` is a reserved keyword, so we append an underscore.)
Every split epimorphism is an epimorphism.
-/
class split_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(section_ : Y ⟶ X)
(id' : section_ ≫ f = 𝟙 Y . obviously)
/-- The chosen retraction of a split monomorphism. -/
def retraction {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_mono f] : Y ⟶ X := split_mono.retraction.{v₁} f
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma split_mono.id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_mono f] : f ≫ retraction f = 𝟙 X :=
split_mono.id'
/-- The retraction of a split monomorphism is itself a split epimorphism. -/
instance retraction_split_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_mono f] : split_epi (retraction f) :=
{ section_ := f }
/--
The chosen section of a split epimorphism.
(Note that `section` is a reserved keyword, so we append an underscore.)
-/
def section_ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_epi f] : Y ⟶ X := split_epi.section_.{v₁} f
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma split_epi.id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_epi f] : section_ f ≫ f = 𝟙 Y :=
split_epi.id'
/-- The section of a split epimorphism is itself a split monomorphism. -/
instance section_split_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_epi f] : split_mono (section_ f) :=
{ retraction := f }
/-- Every iso is a split mono. -/
@[priority 100]
instance split_mono.of_iso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : split_mono f :=
{ retraction := inv f }
/-- Every iso is a split epi. -/
@[priority 100]
instance split_epi.of_iso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : split_epi f :=
{ section_ := inv f }
/-- Every split mono is a mono. -/
@[priority 100]
instance split_mono.mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_mono f] : mono f :=
{ right_cancellation := λ Z g h w, begin replace w := w =≫ retraction f, simpa using w, end }
/-- Every split epi is an epi. -/
@[priority 100]
instance split_epi.epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_epi f] : epi f :=
{ left_cancellation := λ Z g h w, begin replace w := section_ f ≫= w, simpa using w, end }
/-- Every split mono whose retraction is mono is an iso. -/
def is_iso.of_mono_retraction {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [split_mono f] [mono $ retraction f]
: is_iso f :=
{ inv := retraction f,
inv_hom_id' := (cancel_mono_id $ retraction f).mp (by simp) }
/-- Every split epi whose section is epi is an iso. -/
def is_iso.of_epi_section {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [split_epi f] [epi $ section_ f]
: is_iso f :=
{ inv := section_ f,
hom_inv_id' := (cancel_epi_id $ section_ f).mp (by simp) }
instance unop_mono_of_epi {A B : Cᵒᵖ} (f : A ⟶ B) [epi f] : mono f.unop :=
⟨λ Z g h eq, has_hom.hom.op_inj ((cancel_epi f).1 (has_hom.hom.unop_inj eq))⟩
instance unop_epi_of_mono {A B : Cᵒᵖ} (f : A ⟶ B) [mono f] : epi f.unop :=
⟨λ Z g h eq, has_hom.hom.op_inj ((cancel_mono f).1 (has_hom.hom.unop_inj eq))⟩
instance op_mono_of_epi {A B : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [epi f] : mono f.op :=
⟨λ Z g h eq, has_hom.hom.unop_inj ((cancel_epi f).1 (has_hom.hom.op_inj eq))⟩
instance op_epi_of_mono {A B : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [mono f] : epi f.op :=
⟨λ Z g h eq, has_hom.hom.unop_inj ((cancel_mono f).1 (has_hom.hom.op_inj eq))⟩
section
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
/-- Split monomorphisms are also absolute monomorphisms. -/
instance {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_mono f] (F : C ⥤ D) : split_mono (F.map f) :=
{ retraction := F.map (retraction f),
id' := by { rw [←functor.map_comp, split_mono.id, functor.map_id], } }
/-- Split epimorphisms are also absolute epimorphisms. -/
instance {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [split_epi f] (F : C ⥤ D) : split_epi (F.map f) :=
{ section_ := F.map (section_ f),
id' := by { rw [←functor.map_comp, split_epi.id, functor.map_id], } }
end
end category_theory
|
1b2f3b78446df62ed12accad08647c002688e340 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/category_theory/yoneda.lean | 48ac392cbace45cd3d5efce1040afc95523b1436 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,639 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.hom_functor
/-!
# The Yoneda embedding
The Yoneda embedding as a functor `yoneda : C ⥤ (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁)`,
along with an instance that it is `fully_faithful`.
Also the Yoneda lemma, `yoneda_lemma : (yoneda_pairing C) ≅ (yoneda_evaluation C)`.
## References
* [Stacks: Opposite Categories and the Yoneda Lemma](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001L)
-/
namespace category_theory
open opposite
universes v₁ u₁ u₂ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
/--
The Yoneda embedding, as a functor from `C` into presheaves on `C`.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001O.
-/
@[simps]
def yoneda : C ⥤ (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ obj := λ Y, unop Y ⟶ X,
map := λ Y Y' f g, f.unop ≫ g,
map_comp' := λ _ _ _ f g, begin ext, dsimp, erw [category.assoc] end,
map_id' := λ Y, begin ext, dsimp, erw [category.id_comp] end },
map := λ X X' f, { app := λ Y g, g ≫ f } }
/--
The co-Yoneda embedding, as a functor from `Cᵒᵖ` into co-presheaves on `C`.
-/
@[simps] def coyoneda : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ (C ⥤ Type v₁) :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ obj := λ Y, unop X ⟶ Y,
map := λ Y Y' f g, g ≫ f,
map_comp' := λ _ _ _ f g, begin ext1, dsimp, erw [category.assoc] end,
map_id' := λ Y, begin ext1, dsimp, erw [category.comp_id] end },
map := λ X X' f, { app := λ Y g, f.unop ≫ g },
map_comp' := λ _ _ _ f g, begin ext, dsimp, erw [category.assoc] end,
map_id' := λ X, begin ext, dsimp, erw [category.id_comp] end }
namespace yoneda
lemma obj_map_id {X Y : C} (f : op X ⟶ op Y) :
((@yoneda C _).obj X).map f (𝟙 X) = ((@yoneda C _).map f.unop).app (op Y) (𝟙 Y) :=
by obviously
@[simp] lemma naturality {X Y : C} (α : yoneda.obj X ⟶ yoneda.obj Y)
{Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') (h : Z' ⟶ X) : f ≫ α.app (op Z') h = α.app (op Z) (f ≫ h) :=
(functor_to_types.naturality _ _ α f.op h).symm
/--
The Yoneda embedding is full.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001P.
-/
instance yoneda_full : full (@yoneda C _) :=
{ preimage := λ X Y f, (f.app (op X)) (𝟙 X) }
/--
The Yoneda embedding is faithful.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001P.
-/
instance yoneda_faithful : faithful (@yoneda C _) :=
{ map_injective' := λ X Y f g p,
begin
injection p with h,
convert (congr_fun (congr_fun h (op X)) (𝟙 X)); dsimp; simp,
end }
/-- Extensionality via Yoneda. The typical usage would be
```
-- Goal is `X ≅ Y`
apply yoneda.ext,
-- Goals are now functions `(Z ⟶ X) → (Z ⟶ Y)`, `(Z ⟶ Y) → (Z ⟶ X)`, and the fact that these
functions are inverses and natural in `Z`.
```
-/
def ext (X Y : C)
(p : Π {Z : C}, (Z ⟶ X) → (Z ⟶ Y)) (q : Π {Z : C}, (Z ⟶ Y) → (Z ⟶ X))
(h₁ : Π {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X), q (p f) = f) (h₂ : Π {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ Y), p (q f) = f)
(n : Π {Z Z' : C} (f : Z' ⟶ Z) (g : Z ⟶ X), p (f ≫ g) = f ≫ p g) : X ≅ Y :=
@preimage_iso _ _ _ _ yoneda _ _ _ _
(nat_iso.of_components (λ Z, { hom := p, inv := q, }) (by tidy))
/--
If `yoneda.map f` is an isomorphism, so was `f`.
-/
def is_iso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso (yoneda.map f)] : is_iso f :=
is_iso_of_fully_faithful yoneda f
end yoneda
namespace coyoneda
@[simp] lemma naturality {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (α : coyoneda.obj X ⟶ coyoneda.obj Y)
{Z Z' : C} (f : Z' ⟶ Z) (h : unop X ⟶ Z') : (α.app Z' h) ≫ f = α.app Z (h ≫ f) :=
begin erw [functor_to_types.naturality], refl end
instance coyoneda_full : full (@coyoneda C _) :=
{ preimage := λ X Y f, ((f.app (unop X)) (𝟙 _)).op }
instance coyoneda_faithful : faithful (@coyoneda C _) :=
{ map_injective' := λ X Y f g p,
begin
injection p with h,
have t := (congr_fun (congr_fun h (unop X)) (𝟙 _)),
simpa using congr_arg has_hom.hom.op t,
end }
/--
If `coyoneda.map f` is an isomorphism, so was `f`.
-/
def is_iso {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso (coyoneda.map f)] : is_iso f :=
is_iso_of_fully_faithful coyoneda f
end coyoneda
/--
A presheaf `F` is representable if there is object `X` so `F ≅ yoneda.obj X`.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001Q.
-/
-- TODO should we make this a Prop, merely asserting existence of such an object?
class representable (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) :=
(X : C)
(w : yoneda.obj X ≅ F)
end category_theory
namespace category_theory
-- For the rest of the file, we are using product categories,
-- so need to restrict to the case morphisms are in 'Type', not 'Sort'.
universes v₁ u₁ u₂ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
open opposite
variables (C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C]
-- We need to help typeclass inference with some awkward universe levels here.
instance prod_category_instance_1 : category ((Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) × Cᵒᵖ) :=
category_theory.prod.{(max u₁ v₁) v₁} (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) Cᵒᵖ
instance prod_category_instance_2 : category (Cᵒᵖ × (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁)) :=
category_theory.prod.{v₁ (max u₁ v₁)} Cᵒᵖ (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁)
open yoneda
/--
The "Yoneda evaluation" functor, which sends `X : Cᵒᵖ` and `F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type`
to `F.obj X`, functorially in both `X` and `F`.
-/
def yoneda_evaluation : Cᵒᵖ × (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) ⥤ Type (max u₁ v₁) :=
evaluation_uncurried Cᵒᵖ (Type v₁) ⋙ ulift_functor.{u₁}
@[simp] lemma yoneda_evaluation_map_down
(P Q : Cᵒᵖ × (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁)) (α : P ⟶ Q) (x : (yoneda_evaluation C).obj P) :
((yoneda_evaluation C).map α x).down = α.2.app Q.1 (P.2.map α.1 x.down) := rfl
/--
The "Yoneda pairing" functor, which sends `X : Cᵒᵖ` and `F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type`
to `yoneda.op.obj X ⟶ F`, functorially in both `X` and `F`.
-/
def yoneda_pairing : Cᵒᵖ × (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) ⥤ Type (max u₁ v₁) :=
functor.prod yoneda.op (𝟭 (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁)) ⋙ functor.hom (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁)
@[simp] lemma yoneda_pairing_map
(P Q : Cᵒᵖ × (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁)) (α : P ⟶ Q) (β : (yoneda_pairing C).obj P) :
(yoneda_pairing C).map α β = yoneda.map α.1.unop ≫ β ≫ α.2 := rfl
/--
The Yoneda lemma asserts that that the Yoneda pairing
`(X : Cᵒᵖ, F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type) ↦ (yoneda.obj (unop X) ⟶ F)`
is naturally isomorphic to the evaluation `(X, F) ↦ F.obj X`.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001P.
-/
def yoneda_lemma : yoneda_pairing C ≅ yoneda_evaluation C :=
{ hom :=
{ app := λ F x, ulift.up ((x.app F.1) (𝟙 (unop F.1))),
naturality' :=
begin
intros X Y f, ext, dsimp,
erw [category.id_comp, ←functor_to_types.naturality],
simp only [category.comp_id, yoneda_obj_map],
end },
inv :=
{ app := λ F x,
{ app := λ X a, (F.2.map a.op) x.down,
naturality' :=
begin
intros X Y f, ext, dsimp,
rw [functor_to_types.map_comp_apply]
end },
naturality' :=
begin
intros X Y f, ext, dsimp,
rw [←functor_to_types.naturality, functor_to_types.map_comp_apply]
end },
hom_inv_id' :=
begin
ext, dsimp,
erw [←functor_to_types.naturality,
obj_map_id],
simp only [yoneda_map_app, has_hom.hom.unop_op],
erw [category.id_comp],
end,
inv_hom_id' :=
begin
ext, dsimp,
rw [functor_to_types.map_id_apply]
end }.
variables {C}
/--
The isomorphism between `yoneda.obj X ⟶ F` and `F.obj (op X)`
(we need to insert a `ulift` to get the universes right!)
given by the Yoneda lemma.
-/
@[simp] def yoneda_sections (X : C) (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) :
(yoneda.obj X ⟶ F) ≅ ulift.{u₁} (F.obj (op X)) :=
(yoneda_lemma C).app (op X, F)
/--
When `C` is a small category, we can restate the isomorphism from `yoneda_sections`
without having to change universes.
-/
def yoneda_sections_small {C : Type u₁} [small_category C] (X : C)
(F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) :
(yoneda.obj X ⟶ F) ≅ F.obj (op X) :=
yoneda_sections X F ≪≫ ulift_trivial _
@[simp]
lemma yoneda_sections_small_hom {C : Type u₁} [small_category C] (X : C)
(F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) (f : yoneda.obj X ⟶ F) :
(yoneda_sections_small X F).hom f = f.app _ (𝟙 _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma yoneda_sections_small_inv_app_apply {C : Type u₁} [small_category C] (X : C)
(F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) (t : F.obj (op X)) (Y : Cᵒᵖ) (f : Y.unop ⟶ X) :
((yoneda_sections_small X F).inv t).app Y f = F.map f.op t :=
rfl
end category_theory
|
30734fcbb485a94b52a22ea2220388fc6c307945 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /stage0/src/Lean/PrettyPrinter/Formatter.lean | a15741c6942764c256b12c2da11cd25895fbc6bf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,278 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sebastian Ullrich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
/-!
The formatter turns a `Syntax` tree into a `Format` object, inserting both mandatory whitespace (to separate adjacent
tokens) as well as "pretty" optional whitespace.
The basic approach works much like the parenthesizer: A right-to-left traversal over the syntax tree, driven by
parser-specific handlers registered via attributes. The traversal is right-to-left so that when emitting a token, we
already know the text following it and can decide whether or not whitespace between the two is necessary.
-/
import Lean.CoreM
import Lean.Parser.Extension
import Lean.KeyedDeclsAttribute
import Lean.ParserCompiler.Attribute
import Lean.PrettyPrinter.Basic
namespace Lean
namespace PrettyPrinter
namespace Formatter
structure Context where
options : Options
table : Parser.TokenTable
structure State where
stxTrav : Syntax.Traverser
-- Textual content of `stack` up to the first whitespace (not enclosed in an escaped ident). We assume that the textual
-- content of `stack` is modified only by `pushText` and `pushLine`, so `leadWord` is adjusted there accordingly.
leadWord : String := ""
-- Stack of generated Format objects, analogous to the Syntax stack in the parser.
-- Note, however, that the stack is reversed because of the right-to-left traversal.
stack : Array Format := #[]
end Formatter
abbrev FormatterM := ReaderT Formatter.Context $ StateRefT Formatter.State CoreM
@[inline] def FormatterM.orelse {α} (p₁ p₂ : FormatterM α) : FormatterM α := do
let s ← get
catchInternalId backtrackExceptionId
p₁
(fun _ => do set s; p₂)
instance {α} : OrElse (FormatterM α) := ⟨FormatterM.orelse⟩
abbrev Formatter := FormatterM Unit
unsafe def mkFormatterAttribute : IO (KeyedDeclsAttribute Formatter) :=
KeyedDeclsAttribute.init {
builtinName := `builtinFormatter,
name := `formatter,
descr := "Register a formatter for a parser.
[formatter k] registers a declaration of type `Lean.PrettyPrinter.Formatter` for the `SyntaxNodeKind` `k`.",
valueTypeName := `Lean.PrettyPrinter.Formatter,
evalKey := fun builtin stx => do
let env ← getEnv
let id ← Attribute.Builtin.getId stx
-- `isValidSyntaxNodeKind` is updated only in the next stage for new `[builtin*Parser]`s, but we try to
-- synthesize a formatter for it immediately, so we just check for a declaration in this case
if (builtin && (env.find? id).isSome) || Parser.isValidSyntaxNodeKind env id then pure id
else throwError "invalid [formatter] argument, unknown syntax kind '{id}'"
} `Lean.PrettyPrinter.formatterAttribute
@[builtinInit mkFormatterAttribute] constant formatterAttribute : KeyedDeclsAttribute Formatter
unsafe def mkCombinatorFormatterAttribute : IO ParserCompiler.CombinatorAttribute :=
ParserCompiler.registerCombinatorAttribute
`combinatorFormatter
"Register a formatter for a parser combinator.
[combinatorFormatter c] registers a declaration of type `Lean.PrettyPrinter.Formatter` for the `Parser` declaration `c`.
Note that, unlike with [formatter], this is not a node kind since combinators usually do not introduce their own node kinds.
The tagged declaration may optionally accept parameters corresponding to (a prefix of) those of `c`, where `Parser` is replaced
with `Formatter` in the parameter types."
@[builtinInit mkCombinatorFormatterAttribute] constant combinatorFormatterAttribute : ParserCompiler.CombinatorAttribute
namespace Formatter
open Lean.Core
open Lean.Parser
def throwBacktrack {α} : FormatterM α :=
throw $ Exception.internal backtrackExceptionId
instance : Syntax.MonadTraverser FormatterM := ⟨{
get := State.stxTrav <$> get,
set := fun t => modify (fun st => { st with stxTrav := t }),
modifyGet := fun f => modifyGet (fun st => let (a, t) := f st.stxTrav; (a, { st with stxTrav := t }))
}⟩
open Syntax.MonadTraverser
def getStack : FormatterM (Array Format) := do
let st ← get
pure st.stack
def getStackSize : FormatterM Nat := do
let stack ← getStack;
pure stack.size
def setStack (stack : Array Format) : FormatterM Unit :=
modify fun st => { st with stack := stack }
def push (f : Format) : FormatterM Unit :=
modify fun st => { st with stack := st.stack.push f }
def pushLine : FormatterM Unit := do
push Format.line;
modify fun st => { st with leadWord := "" }
/-- Execute `x` at the right-most child of the current node, if any, then advance to the left. -/
def visitArgs (x : FormatterM Unit) : FormatterM Unit := do
let stx ← getCur
if stx.getArgs.size > 0 then
goDown (stx.getArgs.size - 1) *> x <* goUp
goLeft
/-- Execute `x`, pass array of generated Format objects to `fn`, and push result. -/
def fold (fn : Array Format → Format) (x : FormatterM Unit) : FormatterM Unit := do
let sp ← getStackSize
x
let stack ← getStack
let f := fn $ stack.extract sp stack.size
setStack $ (stack.shrink sp).push f
/-- Execute `x` and concatenate generated Format objects. -/
def concat (x : FormatterM Unit) : FormatterM Unit := do
fold (Array.foldl (fun acc f => if acc.isNil then f else f ++ acc) Format.nil) x
def indent (x : Formatter) (indent : Option Int := none) : Formatter := do
concat x
let ctx ← read
let indent := indent.getD $ Std.Format.getIndent ctx.options
modify fun st => { st with stack := st.stack.pop.push (Format.nest indent st.stack.back) }
def group (x : Formatter) : Formatter := do
concat x
modify fun st => { st with stack := st.stack.pop.push (Format.fill st.stack.back) }
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.orelse] def orelse.formatter (p1 p2 : Formatter) : Formatter :=
-- HACK: We have no (immediate) information on which side of the orelse could have produced the current node, so try
-- them in turn. Uses the syntax traverser non-linearly!
p1 <|> p2
-- `mkAntiquot` is quite complex, so we'd rather have its formatter synthesized below the actual parser definition.
-- Note that there is a mutual recursion
-- `categoryParser -> mkAntiquot -> termParser -> categoryParser`, so we need to introduce an indirection somewhere
-- anyway.
@[extern "lean_mk_antiquot_formatter"]
constant mkAntiquot.formatter' (name : String) (kind : Option SyntaxNodeKind) (anonymous := true) : Formatter
-- break up big mutual recursion
@[extern "lean_pretty_printer_formatter_interpret_parser_descr"]
constant interpretParserDescr' : ParserDescr → CoreM Formatter
unsafe def formatterForKindUnsafe (k : SyntaxNodeKind) : Formatter := do
if k == `missing then
push "<missing>"
goLeft
else
let f ← runForNodeKind formatterAttribute k interpretParserDescr'
f
@[implementedBy formatterForKindUnsafe]
constant formatterForKind (k : SyntaxNodeKind) : Formatter
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.withAntiquot]
def withAntiquot.formatter (antiP p : Formatter) : Formatter :=
-- TODO: could be optimized using `isAntiquot` (which would have to be moved), but I'd rather
-- fix the backtracking hack outright.
orelse.formatter antiP p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.withAntiquotSuffixSplice]
def withAntiquotSuffixSplice.formatter (k : SyntaxNodeKind) (p suffix : Formatter) : Formatter := do
if (← getCur).isAntiquotSuffixSplice then
visitArgs <| suffix *> p
else
p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.tokenWithAntiquot]
def tokenWithAntiquot.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := do
if (← getCur).isTokenAntiquot then
visitArgs p
else
p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.categoryParser]
def categoryParser.formatter (cat : Name) : Formatter := group $ indent do
let stx ← getCur
trace[PrettyPrinter.format] "formatting {indentD (fmt stx)}"
if stx.getKind == `choice then
visitArgs do
-- format only last choice
-- TODO: We could use elaborator data here to format the chosen child when available
formatterForKind (← getCur).getKind
else
withAntiquot.formatter (mkAntiquot.formatter' cat.toString none) (formatterForKind stx.getKind)
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.categoryParserOfStack]
def categoryParserOfStack.formatter (offset : Nat) : Formatter := do
let st ← get
let stx := st.stxTrav.parents.back.getArg (st.stxTrav.idxs.back - offset)
categoryParser.formatter stx.getId
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.parserOfStack]
def parserOfStack.formatter (offset : Nat) (prec : Nat := 0) : Formatter := do
let st ← get
let stx := st.stxTrav.parents.back.getArg (st.stxTrav.idxs.back - offset)
formatterForKind stx.getKind
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.error]
def error.formatter (msg : String) : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.errorAtSavedPos]
def errorAtSavedPos.formatter (msg : String) (delta : Bool) : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.atomic]
def atomic.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.lookahead]
def lookahead.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.notFollowedBy]
def notFollowedBy.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.andthen]
def andthen.formatter (p1 p2 : Formatter) : Formatter := p2 *> p1
def checkKind (k : SyntaxNodeKind) : FormatterM Unit := do
let stx ← getCur
if k != stx.getKind then
trace[PrettyPrinter.format.backtrack] "unexpected node kind '{stx.getKind}', expected '{k}'"
throwBacktrack
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.node]
def node.formatter (k : SyntaxNodeKind) (p : Formatter) : Formatter := do
checkKind k;
visitArgs p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.trailingNode]
def trailingNode.formatter (k : SyntaxNodeKind) (_ _ : Nat) (p : Formatter) : Formatter := do
checkKind k
visitArgs do
p;
-- leading term, not actually produced by `p`
categoryParser.formatter `foo
def parseToken (s : String) : FormatterM ParserState := do
Parser.tokenFn [] {
input := s,
fileName := "",
fileMap := FileMap.ofString "",
prec := 0,
env := ← getEnv,
options := ← getOptions,
tokens := (← read).table } (Parser.mkParserState s)
def pushTokenCore (tk : String) : FormatterM Unit := do
if tk.toSubstring.dropRightWhile (fun s => s == ' ') == tk.toSubstring then
push tk
else
pushLine
push tk.trimRight
def pushToken (info : SourceInfo) (tk : String) : FormatterM Unit := do
match info with
| SourceInfo.original _ _ ss _ =>
-- preserve non-whitespace content (i.e. comments)
let ss' := ss.trim
if !ss'.isEmpty then
let ws := { ss with startPos := ss'.stopPos }
if ws.contains '\n' then
push s!"\n{ss'}"
else
push s!" {ss'}"
modify fun st => { st with leadWord := "" }
| _ => pure ()
let st ← get
-- If there is no space between `tk` and the next word, see if we would parse more than `tk` as a single token
if st.leadWord != "" && tk.trimRight == tk then
let tk' := tk.trimLeft
let t ← parseToken $ tk' ++ st.leadWord
if t.pos <= tk'.bsize then
-- stopped within `tk` => use it as is, extend `leadWord` if not prefixed by whitespace
pushTokenCore tk
modify fun st => { st with leadWord := if tk.trimLeft == tk then tk ++ st.leadWord else "" }
else
-- stopped after `tk` => add space
pushTokenCore $ tk ++ " "
modify fun st => { st with leadWord := if tk.trimLeft == tk then tk else "" }
else
-- already separated => use `tk` as is
pushTokenCore tk
modify fun st => { st with leadWord := if tk.trimLeft == tk then tk else "" }
match info with
| SourceInfo.original ss _ _ _ =>
-- preserve non-whitespace content (i.e. comments)
let ss' := ss.trim
if !ss'.isEmpty then
let ws := { ss with startPos := ss'.stopPos }
if ws.contains '\n' then do
-- Indentation is automatically increased when entering a category, but comments should be aligned
-- with the actual token, so dedent
indent (push s!"{ss'}\n") (some ((0:Int) - Std.Format.getIndent (← getOptions)))
else
push s!"{ss'} "
modify fun st => { st with leadWord := "" }
| _ => pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.symbolNoAntiquot]
def symbolNoAntiquot.formatter (sym : String) : Formatter := do
let stx ← getCur
if stx.isToken sym then do
let (Syntax.atom info _) ← pure stx | unreachable!
pushToken info sym
goLeft
else do
trace[PrettyPrinter.format.backtrack] "unexpected syntax '{fmt stx}', expected symbol '{sym}'"
throwBacktrack
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.nonReservedSymbolNoAntiquot] def nonReservedSymbolNoAntiquot.formatter := symbolNoAntiquot.formatter
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.unicodeSymbolNoAntiquot]
def unicodeSymbolNoAntiquot.formatter (sym asciiSym : String) : Formatter := do
let Syntax.atom info val ← getCur
| throwError m!"not an atom: {← getCur}"
if val == sym.trim then
pushToken info sym
else
pushToken info asciiSym;
goLeft
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.identNoAntiquot]
def identNoAntiquot.formatter : Formatter := do
checkKind identKind
let Syntax.ident info _ id _ ← getCur
| throwError m!"not an ident: {← getCur}"
let id := id.simpMacroScopes
pushToken info id.toString
goLeft
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.rawIdentNoAntiquot] def rawIdentNoAntiquot.formatter : Formatter := do
checkKind identKind
let Syntax.ident info _ id _ ← getCur
| throwError m!"not an ident: {← getCur}"
pushToken info id.toString
goLeft
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.identEq] def identEq.formatter (id : Name) := rawIdentNoAntiquot.formatter
def visitAtom (k : SyntaxNodeKind) : Formatter := do
let stx ← getCur
if k != Name.anonymous then
checkKind k
let Syntax.atom info val ← pure $ stx.ifNode (fun n => n.getArg 0) (fun _ => stx)
| throwError m!"not an atom: {stx}"
pushToken info val
goLeft
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.charLitNoAntiquot] def charLitNoAntiquot.formatter := visitAtom charLitKind
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.strLitNoAntiquot] def strLitNoAntiquot.formatter := visitAtom strLitKind
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.nameLitNoAntiquot] def nameLitNoAntiquot.formatter := visitAtom nameLitKind
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.numLitNoAntiquot] def numLitNoAntiquot.formatter := visitAtom numLitKind
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.scientificLitNoAntiquot] def scientificLitNoAntiquot.formatter := visitAtom scientificLitKind
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.fieldIdx] def fieldIdx.formatter := visitAtom fieldIdxKind
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.manyNoAntiquot]
def manyNoAntiquot.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := do
let stx ← getCur
visitArgs $ stx.getArgs.size.forM fun _ => p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.many1NoAntiquot] def many1NoAntiquot.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := manyNoAntiquot.formatter p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.optionalNoAntiquot]
def optionalNoAntiquot.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := visitArgs p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.many1Unbox]
def many1Unbox.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := do
let stx ← getCur
if stx.getKind == nullKind then do
manyNoAntiquot.formatter p
else
p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.sepByNoAntiquot]
def sepByNoAntiquot.formatter (p pSep : Formatter) : Formatter := do
let stx ← getCur
visitArgs $ (List.range stx.getArgs.size).reverse.forM $ fun i => if i % 2 == 0 then p else pSep
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.sepBy1NoAntiquot] def sepBy1NoAntiquot.formatter := sepByNoAntiquot.formatter
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.withPosition] def withPosition.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.withoutPosition] def withoutPosition.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.withForbidden] def withForbidden.formatter (tk : Token) (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.withoutForbidden] def withoutForbidden.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.withoutInfo] def withoutInfo.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.setExpected]
def setExpected.formatter (expected : List String) (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.incQuotDepth] def incQuotDepth.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.decQuotDepth] def decQuotDepth.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.suppressInsideQuot] def suppressInsideQuot.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.evalInsideQuot] def evalInsideQuot.formatter (declName : Name) (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkWsBefore] def checkWsBefore.formatter : Formatter := do
let st ← get
if st.leadWord != "" then
pushLine
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkPrec] def checkPrec.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkLhsPrec] def checkLhsPrec.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.setLhsPrec] def setLhsPrec.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkStackTop] def checkStackTop.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkNoWsBefore] def checkNoWsBefore.formatter : Formatter :=
-- prevent automatic whitespace insertion
modify fun st => { st with leadWord := "" }
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkLinebreakBefore] def checkLinebreakBefore.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkTailWs] def checkTailWs.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkColGe] def checkColGe.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkColGt] def checkColGt.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkLineEq] def checkLineEq.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.eoi] def eoi.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.notFollowedByCategoryToken] def notFollowedByCategoryToken.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkNoImmediateColon] def checkNoImmediateColon.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkInsideQuot] def checkInsideQuot.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.checkOutsideQuot] def checkOutsideQuot.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.skip] def skip.formatter : Formatter := pure ()
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.pushNone] def pushNone.formatter : Formatter := goLeft
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.interpolatedStr]
def interpolatedStr.formatter (p : Formatter) : Formatter := do
visitArgs $ (← getCur).getArgs.reverse.forM fun chunk =>
match chunk.isLit? interpolatedStrLitKind with
| some str => push str *> goLeft
| none => p
@[combinatorFormatter Lean.Parser.dbgTraceState] def dbgTraceState.formatter (label : String) (p : Formatter) : Formatter := p
@[combinatorFormatter ite, macroInline] def ite {α : Type} (c : Prop) [h : Decidable c] (t e : Formatter) : Formatter :=
if c then t else e
abbrev FormatterAliasValue := AliasValue Formatter
builtin_initialize formatterAliasesRef : IO.Ref (NameMap FormatterAliasValue) ← IO.mkRef {}
def registerAlias (aliasName : Name) (v : FormatterAliasValue) : IO Unit := do
Parser.registerAliasCore formatterAliasesRef aliasName v
instance : Coe Formatter FormatterAliasValue := { coe := AliasValue.const }
instance : Coe (Formatter → Formatter) FormatterAliasValue := { coe := AliasValue.unary }
instance : Coe (Formatter → Formatter → Formatter) FormatterAliasValue := { coe := AliasValue.binary }
builtin_initialize
registerAlias "ws" checkWsBefore.formatter
registerAlias "noWs" checkNoWsBefore.formatter
registerAlias "linebreak" checkLinebreakBefore.formatter
registerAlias "colGt" checkColGt.formatter
registerAlias "colGe" checkColGe.formatter
registerAlias "lookahead" lookahead.formatter
registerAlias "atomic" atomic.formatter
registerAlias "notFollowedBy" notFollowedBy.formatter
registerAlias "withPosition" withPosition.formatter
registerAlias "interpolatedStr" interpolatedStr.formatter
registerAlias "orelse" orelse.formatter
registerAlias "andthen" andthen.formatter
end Formatter
open Formatter
def format (formatter : Formatter) (stx : Syntax) : CoreM Format := do
trace[PrettyPrinter.format.input] "{fmt stx}"
let options ← getOptions
let table ← Parser.builtinTokenTable.get
catchInternalId backtrackExceptionId
(do
let (_, st) ← (concat formatter { table := table, options := options }).run { stxTrav := Syntax.Traverser.fromSyntax stx };
pure $ Format.fill $ st.stack.get! 0)
(fun _ => throwError "format: uncaught backtrack exception")
def formatTerm := format $ categoryParser.formatter `term
def formatCommand := format $ categoryParser.formatter `command
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `PrettyPrinter.format;
end PrettyPrinter
end Lean
|
3f0782f151cfad62510436eca0270d58b87f4b8f | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/analysis/convex/extreme.lean | e50db75834b152d6b25cb11a53391dce728e094e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,662 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import linear_algebra.affine_space.independent
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import analysis.convex.topology
/-!
# Extreme sets
This file defines extreme sets and extreme points for sets in a real vector space.
## References
See chapter 8 of [Convexity][simon2011]
TODO:
- add exposed sets to this file.
- define convex independence and prove lemmas related to extreme points.
-/
open_locale classical affine
open set
variables {E : Type*} [add_comm_group E] [module ℝ E] {x : E} {A B C : set E}
/-- A set B is extreme to a set A if B ⊆ A and all points of B only belong to open segments whose
ends are in B. -/
def is_extreme (A B : set E) : Prop :=
B ⊆ A ∧ ∀ x₁ x₂ ∈ A, ∀ x ∈ B, x ∈ open_segment x₁ x₂ → x₁ ∈ B ∧ x₂ ∈ B
namespace is_extreme
@[refl] lemma refl (A : set E) :
is_extreme A A :=
⟨subset.refl _, λ x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x hxA hx, ⟨hx₁A, hx₂A⟩⟩
@[trans] lemma trans (hAB : is_extreme A B) (hBC : is_extreme B C) :
is_extreme A C :=
begin
use subset.trans hBC.1 hAB.1,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x hxC hx,
obtain ⟨hx₁B, hx₂B⟩ := hAB.2 x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x (hBC.1 hxC) hx,
exact hBC.2 x₁ x₂ hx₁B hx₂B x hxC hx,
end
lemma antisymm :
anti_symmetric (is_extreme : set E → set E → Prop) :=
λ A B hAB hBA, subset.antisymm hBA.1 hAB.1
instance : is_partial_order (set E) is_extreme :=
{ refl := refl,
trans := λ A B C, trans,
antisymm := antisymm }
lemma convex_diff (hA : convex A) (hAB : is_extreme A B) :
convex (A \ B) :=
convex_iff_open_segment_subset.2 (λ x₁ x₂ ⟨hx₁A, hx₁B⟩ ⟨hx₂A, hx₂B⟩ x hx,
⟨hA.open_segment_subset hx₁A hx₂A hx, λ hxB, hx₁B (hAB.2 x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x hxB hx).1⟩)
lemma inter (hAB : is_extreme A B) (hAC : is_extreme A C) :
is_extreme A (B ∩ C) :=
begin
use subset.trans (inter_subset_left _ _) hAB.1,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x ⟨hxB, hxC⟩ hx,
obtain ⟨hx₁B, hx₂B⟩ := hAB.2 x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x hxB hx,
obtain ⟨hx₁C, hx₂C⟩ := hAC.2 x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x hxC hx,
exact ⟨⟨hx₁B, hx₁C⟩, hx₂B, hx₂C⟩,
end
lemma Inter {ι : Type*} [nonempty ι] {F : ι → set E}
(hAF : ∀ i : ι, is_extreme A (F i)) :
is_extreme A (⋂ i : ι, F i) :=
begin
obtain i := classical.arbitrary ι,
use Inter_subset_of_subset i (hAF i).1,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x hxF hx,
simp_rw mem_Inter at ⊢ hxF,
have h := λ i, (hAF i).2 x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x (hxF i) hx,
exact ⟨λ i, (h i).1, λ i, (h i).2⟩,
end
lemma bInter {F : set (set E)} (hF : F.nonempty)
(hAF : ∀ B ∈ F, is_extreme A B) :
is_extreme A (⋂ B ∈ F, B) :=
begin
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := hF,
use subset.trans (bInter_subset_of_mem hB) (hAF B hB).1,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x hxF hx,
rw mem_bInter_iff at ⊢ hxF,
rw mem_bInter_iff,
have h := λ B hB, (hAF B hB).2 x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x (hxF B hB) hx,
exact ⟨λ B hB, (h B hB).1, λ B hB, (h B hB).2⟩,
end
lemma sInter {F : set (set E)} (hF : F.nonempty)
(hAF : ∀ B ∈ F, is_extreme A B) :
is_extreme A (⋂₀ F) :=
begin
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := hF,
use subset.trans (sInter_subset_of_mem hB) (hAF B hB).1,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x hxF hx,
simp_rw mem_sInter at ⊢ hxF,
have h := λ B hB, (hAF B hB).2 x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A x (hxF B hB) hx,
exact ⟨λ B hB, (h B hB).1, λ B hB, (h B hB).2⟩,
end
lemma mono (hAC : is_extreme A C) (hBA : B ⊆ A) (hCB : C ⊆ B) :
is_extreme B C :=
⟨hCB, λ x₁ x₂ hx₁B hx₂B x hxC hx, hAC.2 x₁ x₂ (hBA hx₁B) (hBA hx₂B) x hxC hx⟩
end is_extreme
/-- A point x is an extreme point of a set A if x belongs to no open segment with ends in A, except
for the obvious `open_segment x x`. -/
def set.extreme_points (A : set E) : set E :=
{x ∈ A | ∀ (x₁ x₂ ∈ A), x ∈ open_segment x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x ∧ x₂ = x}
lemma extreme_points_def :
x ∈ A.extreme_points ↔ x ∈ A ∧ ∀ (x₁ x₂ ∈ A), x ∈ open_segment x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x ∧ x₂ = x :=
iff.rfl
lemma mem_extreme_points_iff_forall_segment :
x ∈ A.extreme_points ↔ x ∈ A ∧ ∀ (x₁ x₂ ∈ A), x ∈ segment x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x ∨ x₂ = x :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨hxA, hAx⟩,
use hxA,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ hx,
by_contra,
push_neg at h,
exact h.1 (hAx _ _ hx₁ hx₂ (mem_open_segment_of_ne_left_right h.1 h.2 hx)).1 },
rintro ⟨hxA, hAx⟩,
use hxA,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ hx,
obtain rfl | rfl := hAx x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ (open_segment_subset_segment _ _ hx),
{ exact ⟨rfl, (left_mem_open_segment_iff.1 hx).symm⟩ },
exact ⟨right_mem_open_segment_iff.1 hx, rfl⟩,
end
/-- x is an extreme point to A iff {x} is an extreme set of A. -/
lemma mem_extreme_points_iff_extreme_singleton :
x ∈ A.extreme_points ↔ is_extreme A {x} :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨hxA, hAx⟩,
use singleton_subset_iff.2 hxA,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A y (rfl : y = x) hxs,
exact hAx x₁ x₂ hx₁A hx₂A hxs },
rintro hx,
use singleton_subset_iff.1 hx.1,
rintro x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ hxs,
exact hx.2 x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ x rfl hxs
end
lemma extreme_points_subset : A.extreme_points ⊆ A := λ x hx, hx.1
@[simp] lemma extreme_points_empty :
(∅ : set E).extreme_points = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 extreme_points_subset
@[simp] lemma extreme_points_singleton :
({x} : set E).extreme_points = {x} :=
subset.antisymm extreme_points_subset $ singleton_subset_iff.2
⟨mem_singleton x, λ x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ _, ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩⟩
lemma convex.mem_extreme_points_iff_convex_remove (hA : convex A) :
x ∈ A.extreme_points ↔ x ∈ A ∧ convex (A \ {x}) :=
begin
use λ hx, ⟨hx.1, (mem_extreme_points_iff_extreme_singleton.1 hx).convex_diff hA⟩,
rintro ⟨hxA, hAx⟩,
refine mem_extreme_points_iff_forall_segment.2 ⟨hxA, λ x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ hx, _⟩,
rw convex_iff_segment_subset at hAx,
by_contra,
push_neg at h,
exact (hAx ⟨hx₁, λ hx₁, h.1 (mem_singleton_iff.2 hx₁)⟩
⟨hx₂, λ hx₂, h.2 (mem_singleton_iff.2 hx₂)⟩ hx).2 rfl,
end
lemma convex.mem_extreme_points_iff_mem_diff_convex_hull_remove (hA : convex A) :
x ∈ A.extreme_points ↔ x ∈ A \ convex_hull (A \ {x}) :=
by rw [hA.mem_extreme_points_iff_convex_remove, hA.convex_remove_iff_not_mem_convex_hull_remove,
mem_diff]
lemma inter_extreme_points_subset_extreme_points_of_subset (hBA : B ⊆ A) :
B ∩ A.extreme_points ⊆ B.extreme_points :=
λ x ⟨hxB, hxA⟩, ⟨hxB, λ x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ hx, hxA.2 x₁ x₂ (hBA hx₁) (hBA hx₂) hx⟩
namespace is_extreme
lemma extreme_points_subset_extreme_points (hAB : is_extreme A B) :
B.extreme_points ⊆ A.extreme_points :=
λ x hx, mem_extreme_points_iff_extreme_singleton.2 (hAB.trans
(mem_extreme_points_iff_extreme_singleton.1 hx))
lemma extreme_points_eq (hAB : is_extreme A B) :
B.extreme_points = B ∩ A.extreme_points :=
subset.antisymm (λ x hx, ⟨hx.1, hAB.extreme_points_subset_extreme_points hx⟩)
(inter_extreme_points_subset_extreme_points_of_subset hAB.1)
end is_extreme
lemma extreme_points_convex_hull_subset :
(convex_hull A).extreme_points ⊆ A :=
begin
rintro x hx,
rw (convex_convex_hull _).mem_extreme_points_iff_convex_remove at hx,
by_contra,
exact (convex_hull_min (subset_diff.2 ⟨subset_convex_hull _, disjoint_singleton_right.2 h⟩) hx.2
hx.1).2 rfl,
end
|
ec1b15ca94b1c73f83bcd79e94c8fc4fcd0f9c2c | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /hott/homotopy/sphere.hlean | 7c2f6699b9237c6d63b96815a1b8b689654fb434 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,046 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
Declaration of the n-spheres
-/
import .susp types.trunc
open eq nat susp bool is_trunc unit pointed algebra
/-
We can define spheres with the following possible indices:
- trunc_index (defining S^-2 = S^-1 = empty)
- nat (forgetting that S^-1 = empty)
- nat, but counting wrong (S^0 = empty, S^1 = bool, ...)
- some new type "integers >= -1"
We choose the last option here.
-/
/- Sphere levels -/
inductive sphere_index : Type₀ :=
| minus_one : sphere_index
| succ : sphere_index → sphere_index
notation `ℕ₋₁` := sphere_index
namespace trunc_index
definition sub_one [reducible] (n : ℕ₋₁) : ℕ₋₂ :=
sphere_index.rec_on n -2 (λ n k, k.+1)
postfix `..-1`:(max+1) := sub_one
definition of_sphere_index [reducible] (n : ℕ₋₁) : ℕ₋₂ :=
n..-1.+1
-- we use a double dot to distinguish with the notation .-1 in trunc_index (of type ℕ → ℕ₋₂)
end trunc_index
namespace sphere_index
/-
notation for sphere_index is -1, 0, 1, ...
from 0 and up this comes from a coercion from num to sphere_index (via nat)
-/
postfix `.+1`:(max+1) := sphere_index.succ
postfix `.+2`:(max+1) := λ(n : sphere_index), (n .+1 .+1)
notation `-1` := minus_one
definition has_zero_sphere_index [instance] : has_zero ℕ₋₁ :=
has_zero.mk (succ minus_one)
definition has_one_sphere_index [instance] : has_one ℕ₋₁ :=
has_one.mk (succ (succ minus_one))
definition add_plus_one (n m : ℕ₋₁) : ℕ₋₁ :=
sphere_index.rec_on m n (λ k l, l .+1)
-- addition of sphere_indices, where (-1 + -1) is defined to be -1.
protected definition add (n m : ℕ₋₁) : ℕ₋₁ :=
sphere_index.cases_on m
(sphere_index.cases_on n -1 id)
(sphere_index.rec n (λn' r, succ r))
inductive le (a : ℕ₋₁) : ℕ₋₁ → Type :=
| sp_refl : le a a
| step : Π {b}, le a b → le a (b.+1)
infix ` +1+ `:65 := sphere_index.add_plus_one
definition has_add_sphere_index [instance] [priority 2000] [reducible] : has_add ℕ₋₁ :=
has_add.mk sphere_index.add
definition has_le_sphere_index [instance] : has_le ℕ₋₁ :=
has_le.mk sphere_index.le
definition sub_one [reducible] (n : ℕ) : ℕ₋₁ :=
nat.rec_on n -1 (λ n k, k.+1)
postfix `..-1`:(max+1) := sub_one
definition of_nat [coercion] [reducible] (n : ℕ) : ℕ₋₁ :=
n..-1.+1
-- we use a double dot to distinguish with the notation .-1 in trunc_index (of type ℕ → ℕ₋₂)
definition add_one [reducible] (n : ℕ₋₁) : ℕ :=
sphere_index.rec_on n 0 (λ n k, nat.succ k)
definition add_plus_one_of_nat (n m : ℕ) : (n +1+ m) = sphere_index.of_nat (n + m + 1) :=
begin
induction m with m IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact ap succ IH}
end
definition succ_sub_one (n : ℕ) : (nat.succ n)..-1 = n :> ℕ₋₁ :=
idp
definition add_sub_one (n m : ℕ) : (n + m)..-1 = n..-1 +1+ m..-1 :> ℕ₋₁ :=
begin
induction m with m IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact ap succ IH }
end
definition succ_le_succ {n m : ℕ₋₁} (H : n ≤ m) : n.+1 ≤[ℕ₋₁] m.+1 :=
by induction H with m H IH; apply le.sp_refl; exact le.step IH
definition minus_one_le (n : ℕ₋₁) : -1 ≤[ℕ₋₁] n :=
by induction n with n IH; apply le.sp_refl; exact le.step IH
open decidable
protected definition has_decidable_eq [instance] : Π(n m : ℕ₋₁), decidable (n = m)
| has_decidable_eq -1 -1 := inl rfl
| has_decidable_eq (n.+1) -1 := inr (by contradiction)
| has_decidable_eq -1 (m.+1) := inr (by contradiction)
| has_decidable_eq (n.+1) (m.+1) :=
match has_decidable_eq n m with
| inl xeqy := inl (by rewrite xeqy)
| inr xney := inr (λ h : succ n = succ m, by injection h with xeqy; exact absurd xeqy xney)
end
definition not_succ_le_minus_two {n : sphere_index} (H : n .+1 ≤[ℕ₋₁] -1) : empty :=
by cases H
protected definition le_trans {n m k : ℕ₋₁} (H1 : n ≤[ℕ₋₁] m) (H2 : m ≤[ℕ₋₁] k) : n ≤[ℕ₋₁] k :=
begin
induction H2 with k H2 IH,
{ exact H1},
{ exact le.step IH}
end
definition le_of_succ_le_succ {n m : ℕ₋₁} (H : n.+1 ≤[ℕ₋₁] m.+1) : n ≤[ℕ₋₁] m :=
begin
cases H with m H',
{ apply le.sp_refl},
{ exact sphere_index.le_trans (le.step !le.sp_refl) H'}
end
theorem not_succ_le_self {n : ℕ₋₁} : ¬n.+1 ≤[ℕ₋₁] n :=
begin
induction n with n IH: intro H,
{ exact not_succ_le_minus_two H},
{ exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H)}
end
protected definition le_antisymm {n m : ℕ₋₁} (H1 : n ≤[ℕ₋₁] m) (H2 : m ≤[ℕ₋₁] n) : n = m :=
begin
induction H2 with n H2 IH,
{ reflexivity},
{ exfalso, apply @not_succ_le_self n, exact sphere_index.le_trans H1 H2}
end
protected definition le_succ {n m : ℕ₋₁} (H1 : n ≤[ℕ₋₁] m): n ≤[ℕ₋₁] m.+1 :=
le.step H1
definition add_plus_one_minus_one (n : ℕ₋₁) : n +1+ -1 = n := idp
definition add_plus_one_succ (n m : ℕ₋₁) : n +1+ (m.+1) = (n +1+ m).+1 := idp
definition minus_one_add_plus_one (n : ℕ₋₁) : -1 +1+ n = n :=
begin induction n with n IH, reflexivity, exact ap succ IH end
definition succ_add_plus_one (n m : ℕ₋₁) : (n.+1) +1+ m = (n +1+ m).+1 :=
begin induction m with m IH, reflexivity, exact ap succ IH end
definition sphere_index_of_nat_add_one (n : ℕ₋₁) : sphere_index.of_nat (add_one n) = n.+1 :=
begin induction n with n IH, reflexivity, exact ap succ IH end
definition add_one_succ (n : ℕ₋₁) : add_one (n.+1) = succ (add_one n) :=
by reflexivity
definition add_one_sub_one (n : ℕ) : add_one (n..-1) = n :=
begin induction n with n IH, reflexivity, exact ap nat.succ IH end
definition add_one_of_nat (n : ℕ) : add_one n = nat.succ n :=
ap nat.succ (add_one_sub_one n)
definition sphere_index.of_nat_succ (n : ℕ)
: sphere_index.of_nat (nat.succ n) = (sphere_index.of_nat n).+1 :=
begin induction n with n IH, reflexivity, exact ap succ IH end
/-
warning: if this coercion is available, the coercion ℕ → ℕ₋₂ is the composition of the coercions
ℕ → ℕ₋₁ → ℕ₋₂. We don't want this composition as coercion, because it has worse computational
properties. You can rewrite it with trans_to_of_sphere_index_eq defined below.
-/
attribute trunc_index.of_sphere_index [coercion]
end sphere_index open sphere_index
definition weak_order_sphere_index [trans_instance] [reducible] : weak_order sphere_index :=
weak_order.mk le sphere_index.le.sp_refl @sphere_index.le_trans @sphere_index.le_antisymm
namespace trunc_index
definition sub_two_eq_sub_one_sub_one (n : ℕ) : n.-2 = n..-1..-1 :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ reflexivity},
{ exact ap trunc_index.succ IH}
end
definition of_nat_sub_one (n : ℕ)
: (sphere_index.of_nat n)..-1 = (trunc_index.sub_two n).+1 :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ reflexivity},
{ exact ap trunc_index.succ IH}
end
definition sub_one_of_sphere_index (n : ℕ)
: of_sphere_index n..-1 = (trunc_index.sub_two n).+1 :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ reflexivity},
{ exact ap trunc_index.succ IH}
end
definition succ_sub_one (n : ℕ₋₁) : n.+1..-1 = n :> ℕ₋₂ :=
idp
definition of_sphere_index_of_nat (n : ℕ)
: of_sphere_index (sphere_index.of_nat n) = of_nat n :> ℕ₋₂ :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ reflexivity},
{ exact ap trunc_index.succ IH}
end
definition trans_to_of_sphere_index_eq (n : ℕ)
: trunc_index._trans_to_of_sphere_index n = of_nat n :> ℕ₋₂ :=
of_sphere_index_of_nat n
definition trunc_index_of_nat_add_one (n : ℕ₋₁)
: trunc_index.of_nat (add_one n) = (of_sphere_index n).+1 :=
begin induction n with n IH, reflexivity, exact ap succ IH end
definition of_sphere_index_succ (n : ℕ₋₁) : of_sphere_index (n.+1) = (of_sphere_index n).+1 :=
begin induction n with n IH, reflexivity, exact ap succ IH end
end trunc_index
open sphere_index equiv
definition sphere (n : ℕ₋₁) : Type₀ := iterate_susp (add_one n) empty
namespace sphere
export [notation] sphere_index
definition base {n : ℕ} : sphere n := north
definition pointed_sphere [instance] [constructor] (n : ℕ) : pointed (sphere n) :=
pointed.mk base
definition psphere [constructor] (n : ℕ) : Type* := pointed.mk' (sphere n)
namespace ops
abbreviation S := sphere
notation `S*` := psphere
end ops
open sphere.ops
definition sphere_minus_one : S -1 = empty := idp
definition sphere_succ [unfold_full] (n : ℕ₋₁) : S n.+1 = susp (S n) := idp
definition psphere_succ [unfold_full] (n : ℕ) : S* (n + 1) = psusp (S* n) := idp
definition psphere_eq_iterate_susp (n : ℕ)
: S* n = pointed.MK (iterate_susp (succ n) empty) !north :=
begin
esimp,
apply ap (λx, pointed.MK (susp x) (@north x)); apply ap (λx, iterate_susp x empty),
apply add_one_sub_one
end
definition equator [constructor] (n : ℕ) : S* n →* Ω (S* (succ n)) :=
loop_susp_unit (S* n)
definition surf {n : ℕ} : Ω[n] (S* n) :=
begin
induction n with n s,
{ exact @base 0},
{ exact (loopn_succ_in (S* (succ n)) n)⁻¹ᵉ* (apn n (equator n) s), }
end
definition bool_of_sphere [unfold 1] : S 0 → bool :=
proof susp.rec ff tt (λx, empty.elim x) qed
definition sphere_of_bool [unfold 1] : bool → S 0
| ff := proof north qed
| tt := proof south qed
definition sphere_equiv_bool : S 0 ≃ bool :=
equiv.MK bool_of_sphere
sphere_of_bool
(λb, match b with | tt := idp | ff := idp end)
(λx, proof susp.rec_on x idp idp (empty.rec _) qed)
definition psphere_pequiv_pbool : S* 0 ≃* pbool :=
pequiv_of_equiv sphere_equiv_bool idp
definition sphere_eq_bool : S 0 = bool :=
ua sphere_equiv_bool
definition sphere_eq_pbool : S* 0 = pbool :=
pType_eq sphere_equiv_bool idp
-- TODO1: the commented-out part makes the forward function below "apn _ surf" (the next def also)
-- TODO2: we could make this a pointed equivalence
definition psphere_pmap_equiv (A : Type*) (n : ℕ) : (S* n →* A) ≃ Ω[n] A :=
begin
-- fapply equiv_change_fun,
-- {
revert A, induction n with n IH: intro A,
{ refine _ ⬝e !pmap_bool_equiv, exact pequiv_ppcompose_right psphere_pequiv_pbool⁻¹ᵉ*},
{ refine susp_adjoint_loop (S* n) A ⬝e !IH ⬝e !loopn_succ_in⁻¹ᵉ* }
-- },
-- { intro f, exact apn n f surf},
-- { revert A, induction n with n IH: intro A f,
-- { exact sorry},
-- { exact sorry}}
end
-- definition psphere_pmap_equiv' (A : Type*) (n : ℕ) : (S* n →* A) ≃ Ω[n] A :=
-- begin
-- fapply equiv.MK,
-- { intro f, exact apn n f surf },
-- { revert A, induction n with n IH: intro A p,
-- { exact !pmap_bool_equiv⁻¹ᵉ p ∘* psphere_pequiv_pbool },
-- { refine (susp_adjoint_loop (S* n) A)⁻¹ᵉ (IH (Ω A) _),
-- exact loopn_succ_in A n p }},
-- { exact sorry},
-- { exact sorry}
-- end
protected definition elim {n : ℕ} {P : Type*} (p : Ω[n] P) : S* n →* P :=
to_inv !psphere_pmap_equiv p
-- definition elim_surf {n : ℕ} {P : Type*} (p : Ω[n] P) : apn n (sphere.elim p) surf = p :=
-- begin
-- induction n with n IH,
-- { esimp [apn,surf,sphere.elim,psphere_pmap_equiv], apply sorry},
-- { apply sorry}
-- end
end sphere
namespace sphere
open is_conn trunc_index sphere_index sphere.ops
-- Corollary 8.2.2
theorem is_conn_sphere [instance] (n : ℕ₋₁) : is_conn (n..-1) (S n) :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ apply is_conn_minus_two },
{ rewrite [trunc_index.succ_sub_one n, sphere.sphere_succ],
apply is_conn_susp }
end
theorem is_conn_psphere [instance] (n : ℕ) : is_conn (n.-1) (S* n) :=
transport (λx, is_conn x (sphere n)) (of_nat_sub_one n) (is_conn_sphere n)
end sphere
open sphere sphere.ops
namespace is_trunc
open trunc_index
variables {n : ℕ} {A : Type}
definition is_trunc_of_psphere_pmap_equiv_constant
(H : Π(a : A) (f : S* n →* pointed.Mk a) (x : S n), f x = f base) : is_trunc (n.-2.+1) A :=
begin
apply iff.elim_right !is_trunc_iff_is_contr_loop,
intro a,
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed, apply psphere_pmap_equiv,
fapply is_contr.mk,
{ exact pmap.mk (λx, a) idp},
{ intro f, fapply pmap_eq,
{ intro x, esimp, refine !respect_pt⁻¹ ⬝ (!H ⬝ !H⁻¹)},
{ rewrite [▸*,con.right_inv,▸*,con.left_inv]}}
end
definition is_trunc_iff_map_sphere_constant
(H : Π(f : S n → A) (x : S n), f x = f base) : is_trunc (n.-2.+1) A :=
begin
apply is_trunc_of_psphere_pmap_equiv_constant,
intros, cases f with f p, esimp at *, apply H
end
definition psphere_pmap_equiv_constant_of_is_trunc' [H : is_trunc (n.-2.+1) A]
(a : A) (f : S* n →* pointed.Mk a) (x : S n) : f x = f base :=
begin
let H' := iff.elim_left (is_trunc_iff_is_contr_loop n A) H a,
note H'' := @is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev _ _ _ !psphere_pmap_equiv H',
have p : (f = pmap.mk (λx, f base) (respect_pt f)),
by apply is_prop.elim,
exact ap10 (ap pmap.to_fun p) x
end
definition psphere_pmap_equiv_constant_of_is_trunc [H : is_trunc (n.-2.+1) A]
(a : A) (f : S* n →* pointed.Mk a) (x y : S n) : f x = f y :=
let H := psphere_pmap_equiv_constant_of_is_trunc' a f in !H ⬝ !H⁻¹
definition map_sphere_constant_of_is_trunc [H : is_trunc (n.-2.+1) A]
(f : S n → A) (x y : S n) : f x = f y :=
psphere_pmap_equiv_constant_of_is_trunc (f base) (pmap.mk f idp) x y
definition map_sphere_constant_of_is_trunc_self [H : is_trunc (n.-2.+1) A]
(f : S n → A) (x : S n) : map_sphere_constant_of_is_trunc f x x = idp :=
!con.right_inv
end is_trunc
|
9d2bde88ee6aa8da2438ff181769415724bd63f3 | 3dd1b66af77106badae6edb1c4dea91a146ead30 | /tests/lean/run/e2.lean | 0b606100f58bb28044909ff638b756f46b7b171d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | silky/lean | 79c20c15c93feef47bb659a2cc139b26f3614642 | df8b88dca2f8da1a422cb618cd476ef5be730546 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,737,587,697 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 22,362,176 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 48 | lean | definition Prop [inline] := Type.{0}
check Prop
|
3ee99cf95c4a1d5e85a3a5e7656341927afc793f | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/order/category/Lat.lean | 5fe82c5f481fe142b89b9b3da4c7042802f44aa0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,500 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import order.category.PartOrd
import order.hom.lattice
/-!
# The category of lattices
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This defines `Lat`, the category of lattices.
Note that `Lat` doesn't correspond to the literature definition of [`Lat`]
(https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Lat) as we don't require bottom or top elements. Instead, `Lat`
corresponds to `BddLat`.
## TODO
The free functor from `Lat` to `BddLat` is `X → with_top (with_bot X)`.
-/
universes u
open category_theory
/-- The category of lattices. -/
def Lat := bundled lattice
namespace Lat
instance : has_coe_to_sort Lat Type* := bundled.has_coe_to_sort
instance (X : Lat) : lattice X := X.str
/-- Construct a bundled `Lat` from a `lattice`. -/
def of (α : Type*) [lattice α] : Lat := bundled.of α
@[simp] lemma coe_of (α : Type*) [lattice α] : ↥(of α) = α := rfl
instance : inhabited Lat := ⟨of bool⟩
instance : bundled_hom @lattice_hom :=
{ to_fun := λ _ _ _ _, coe_fn,
id := @lattice_hom.id,
comp := @lattice_hom.comp,
hom_ext := λ X Y _ _, by exactI fun_like.coe_injective }
instance : large_category.{u} Lat := bundled_hom.category lattice_hom
instance : concrete_category Lat := bundled_hom.concrete_category lattice_hom
instance has_forget_to_PartOrd : has_forget₂ Lat PartOrd :=
{ forget₂ := { obj := λ X, ⟨X⟩, map := λ X Y f, f },
forget_comp := rfl }
/-- Constructs an isomorphism of lattices from an order isomorphism between them. -/
@[simps] def iso.mk {α β : Lat.{u}} (e : α ≃o β) : α ≅ β :=
{ hom := e,
inv := e.symm,
hom_inv_id' := by { ext, exact e.symm_apply_apply _ },
inv_hom_id' := by { ext, exact e.apply_symm_apply _ } }
/-- `order_dual` as a functor. -/
@[simps] def dual : Lat ⥤ Lat := { obj := λ X, of Xᵒᵈ, map := λ X Y, lattice_hom.dual }
/-- The equivalence between `Lat` and itself induced by `order_dual` both ways. -/
@[simps functor inverse] def dual_equiv : Lat ≌ Lat :=
equivalence.mk dual dual
(nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.mk $ order_iso.dual_dual X) $ λ X Y f, rfl)
(nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.mk $ order_iso.dual_dual X) $ λ X Y f, rfl)
end Lat
lemma Lat_dual_comp_forget_to_PartOrd :
Lat.dual ⋙ forget₂ Lat PartOrd =
forget₂ Lat PartOrd ⋙ PartOrd.dual := rfl
|
495539c434521580fd637c9f1476ec0b36544bd2 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/category_theory/category/preorder.lean | 46f3bcc89b8134b8aa277e0748572d435feb5033 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,586 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Reid Barton
-/
import category_theory.equivalence
import order.hom.basic
/-!
# Preorders as categories
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
We install a category instance on any preorder. This is not to be confused with the category _of_
preorders, defined in `order/category/Preorder`.
We show that monotone functions between preorders correspond to functors of the associated
categories.
## Main definitions
* `hom_of_le` and `le_of_hom` provide translations between inequalities in the preorder, and
morphisms in the associated category.
* `monotone.functor` is the functor associated to a monotone function.
-/
universes u v
namespace preorder
open category_theory
/--
The category structure coming from a preorder. There is a morphism `X ⟶ Y` if and only if `X ≤ Y`.
Because we don't allow morphisms to live in `Prop`,
we have to define `X ⟶ Y` as `ulift (plift (X ≤ Y))`.
See `category_theory.hom_of_le` and `category_theory.le_of_hom`.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00D3>.
-/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance small_category (α : Type u) [preorder α] : small_category α :=
{ hom := λ U V, ulift (plift (U ≤ V)),
id := λ X, ⟨ ⟨ le_refl X ⟩ ⟩,
comp := λ X Y Z f g, ⟨ ⟨ le_trans _ _ _ f.down.down g.down.down ⟩ ⟩ }
end preorder
namespace category_theory
open opposite
variables {X : Type u} [preorder X]
/--
Express an inequality as a morphism in the corresponding preorder category.
-/
def hom_of_le {x y : X} (h : x ≤ y) : x ⟶ y := ulift.up (plift.up h)
alias hom_of_le ← _root_.has_le.le.hom
@[simp] lemma hom_of_le_refl {x : X} : (le_refl x).hom = 𝟙 x := rfl
@[simp] lemma hom_of_le_comp {x y z : X} (h : x ≤ y) (k : y ≤ z) :
h.hom ≫ k.hom = (h.trans k).hom := rfl
/--
Extract the underlying inequality from a morphism in a preorder category.
-/
lemma le_of_hom {x y : X} (h : x ⟶ y) : x ≤ y := h.down.down
alias le_of_hom ← _root_.quiver.hom.le
@[simp] lemma le_of_hom_hom_of_le {x y : X} (h : x ≤ y) : h.hom.le = h := rfl
@[simp] lemma hom_of_le_le_of_hom {x y : X} (h : x ⟶ y) : h.le.hom = h :=
by { cases h, cases h, refl, }
/-- Construct a morphism in the opposite of a preorder category from an inequality. -/
def op_hom_of_le {x y : Xᵒᵖ} (h : unop x ≤ unop y) : y ⟶ x := h.hom.op
lemma le_of_op_hom {x y : Xᵒᵖ} (h : x ⟶ y) : unop y ≤ unop x := h.unop.le
instance unique_to_top [order_top X] {x : X} : unique (x ⟶ ⊤) := by tidy
instance unique_from_bot [order_bot X] {x : X} : unique (⊥ ⟶ x) := by tidy
end category_theory
section
variables {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} [preorder X] [preorder Y]
/--
A monotone function between preorders induces a functor between the associated categories.
-/
def monotone.functor {f : X → Y} (h : monotone f) : X ⥤ Y :=
{ obj := f,
map := λ x₁ x₂ g, (h g.le).hom }
@[simp] lemma monotone.functor_obj {f : X → Y} (h : monotone f) : h.functor.obj = f := rfl
end
namespace category_theory
section preorder
variables {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} [preorder X] [preorder Y]
/--
A functor between preorder categories is monotone.
-/
@[mono] lemma functor.monotone (f : X ⥤ Y) : monotone f.obj :=
λ x y hxy, (f.map hxy.hom).le
end preorder
section partial_order
variables {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} [partial_order X] [partial_order Y]
lemma iso.to_eq {x y : X} (f : x ≅ y) : x = y := le_antisymm f.hom.le f.inv.le
/--
A categorical equivalence between partial orders is just an order isomorphism.
-/
def equivalence.to_order_iso (e : X ≌ Y) : X ≃o Y :=
{ to_fun := e.functor.obj,
inv_fun := e.inverse.obj,
left_inv := λ a, (e.unit_iso.app a).to_eq.symm,
right_inv := λ b, (e.counit_iso.app b).to_eq,
map_rel_iff' := λ a a',
⟨λ h, ((equivalence.unit e).app a ≫ e.inverse.map h.hom ≫ (equivalence.unit_inv e).app a').le,
λ (h : a ≤ a'), (e.functor.map h.hom).le⟩, }
-- `@[simps]` on `equivalence.to_order_iso` produces lemmas that fail the `simp_nf` linter,
-- so we provide them by hand:
@[simp]
lemma equivalence.to_order_iso_apply (e : X ≌ Y) (x : X) :
e.to_order_iso x = e.functor.obj x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma equivalence.to_order_iso_symm_apply (e : X ≌ Y) (y : Y) :
e.to_order_iso.symm y = e.inverse.obj y := rfl
end partial_order
end category_theory
|
4d412c7b088d617369263b8382ea09d0551c67c7 | 4bcaca5dc83d49803f72b7b5920b75b6e7d9de2d | /tests/lean/interactive/hover.lean | 8f248e70af686108adf1b720ededfcf1a468b09c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | subfish-zhou/leanprover-zh_CN.github.io | 30b9fba9bd790720bd95764e61ae796697d2f603 | 8b2985d4a3d458ceda9361ac454c28168d920d3f | refs/heads/master | 1,689,709,967,820 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 409,962,097 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,007 | lean | import Lean
example : True := by
apply True.intro
--^ textDocument/hover
example : True := by
simp [True.intro]
--^ textDocument/hover
example (n : Nat) : True := by
match n with
| Nat.zero => _
--^ textDocument/hover
| n + 1 => _
/-- My tactic -/
macro "mytac" o:"only"? e:term : tactic => `(exact $e)
example : True := by
mytac only True.intro
--^ textDocument/hover
--^ textDocument/hover
--^ textDocument/hover
/-- My way better tactic -/
macro_rules
| `(tactic| mytac $[only]? $e) => `(apply $e)
example : True := by
mytac only True.intro
--^ textDocument/hover
/-- My ultimate tactic -/
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| mytac $[only]? $e) => `(tactic| refine $e) >>= Lean.Elab.Tactic.evalTactic
example : True := by
mytac only True.intro
--^ textDocument/hover
/-- My notation -/
macro "mynota" e:term : term => e
#check mynota 1
--^ textDocument/hover
/-- My way better notation -/
macro_rules
| `(mynota $e) => `(2 * $e)
#check mynota 1
--^ textDocument/hover
-- macro_rules take precedence over elab_rules for term/command, so use new syntax
syntax "mynota'" term : term
/-- My ultimate notation -/
elab_rules : term
| `(mynota' $e) => `($e * $e) >>= (Lean.Elab.Term.elabTerm · none)
#check mynota' 1
--^ textDocument/hover
/-- My command -/
macro "mycmd" e:term : command => `(def hi := $e)
mycmd 1
--^ textDocument/hover
/-- My way better command -/
macro_rules
| `(mycmd $e) => `(@[inline] def hi := $e)
mycmd 1
--^ textDocument/hover
syntax "mycmd'" term : command
/-- My ultimate command -/
elab_rules : command
| `(mycmd' $e) => `(/-- hi -/ @[inline] def hi := $e) >>= Lean.Elab.Command.elabCommand
mycmd' 1
--^ textDocument/hover
#check ({ a := }) -- should not show `sorry`
--^ textDocument/hover
example : True := by
simp [id True.intro]
--^ textDocument/hover
--^ textDocument/hover
example : Id Nat := do
let mut n := 1
n := 2
--^ textDocument/hover
n
|
67c9252cdfb98ef68b957850ba4dc9589c726969 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/group/type_tags.lean | 681f0413fbe03987bff875304124a84f66403322 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,137 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.group.hom
import data.equiv.basic
/-!
# Type tags that turn additive structures into multiplicative, and vice versa
We define two type tags:
* `additive α`: turns any multiplicative structure on `α` into the corresponding
additive structure on `additive α`;
* `multiplicative α`: turns any additive structure on `α` into the corresponding
multiplicative structure on `multiplicative α`.
We also define instances `additive.*` and `multiplicative.*` that actually transfer the structures.
-/
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- If `α` carries some multiplicative structure, then `additive α` carries the corresponding
additive structure. -/
def additive (α : Type*) := α
/-- If `α` carries some additive structure, then `multiplicative α` carries the corresponding
multiplicative structure. -/
def multiplicative (α : Type*) := α
namespace additive
/-- Reinterpret `x : α` as an element of `additive α`. -/
def of_mul : α ≃ additive α := ⟨λ x, x, λ x, x, λ x, rfl, λ x, rfl⟩
/-- Reinterpret `x : additive α` as an element of `α`. -/
def to_mul : additive α ≃ α := of_mul.symm
@[simp] lemma of_mul_symm_eq : (@of_mul α).symm = to_mul := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_mul_symm_eq : (@to_mul α).symm = of_mul := rfl
end additive
namespace multiplicative
/-- Reinterpret `x : α` as an element of `multiplicative α`. -/
def of_add : α ≃ multiplicative α := ⟨λ x, x, λ x, x, λ x, rfl, λ x, rfl⟩
/-- Reinterpret `x : multiplicative α` as an element of `α`. -/
def to_add : multiplicative α ≃ α := of_add.symm
@[simp] lemma of_add_symm_eq : (@of_add α).symm = to_add := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_add_symm_eq : (@to_add α).symm = of_add := rfl
end multiplicative
@[simp] lemma to_add_of_add (x : α) : (multiplicative.of_add x).to_add = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_add_to_add (x : multiplicative α) : multiplicative.of_add x.to_add = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_mul_of_mul (x : α) : (additive.of_mul x).to_mul = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_mul_to_mul (x : additive α) : additive.of_mul x.to_mul = x := rfl
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (additive α) := ⟨additive.of_mul (default α)⟩
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (multiplicative α) := ⟨multiplicative.of_add (default α)⟩
instance [nontrivial α] : nontrivial (additive α) :=
additive.of_mul.injective.nontrivial
instance [nontrivial α] : nontrivial (multiplicative α) :=
multiplicative.of_add.injective.nontrivial
instance additive.has_add [has_mul α] : has_add (additive α) :=
{ add := λ x y, additive.of_mul (x.to_mul * y.to_mul) }
instance [has_add α] : has_mul (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul := λ x y, multiplicative.of_add (x.to_add + y.to_add) }
@[simp] lemma of_add_add [has_add α] (x y : α) :
multiplicative.of_add (x + y) = multiplicative.of_add x * multiplicative.of_add y :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_add_mul [has_add α] (x y : multiplicative α) :
(x * y).to_add = x.to_add + y.to_add :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma of_mul_mul [has_mul α] (x y : α) :
additive.of_mul (x * y) = additive.of_mul x + additive.of_mul y :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_mul_add [has_mul α] (x y : additive α) :
(x + y).to_mul = x.to_mul * y.to_mul :=
rfl
instance [semigroup α] : add_semigroup (additive α) :=
{ add_assoc := @mul_assoc α _,
..additive.has_add }
instance [add_semigroup α] : semigroup (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_assoc := @add_assoc α _,
..multiplicative.has_mul }
instance [comm_semigroup α] : add_comm_semigroup (additive α) :=
{ add_comm := @mul_comm _ _,
..additive.add_semigroup }
instance [add_comm_semigroup α] : comm_semigroup (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_comm := @add_comm _ _,
..multiplicative.semigroup }
instance [left_cancel_semigroup α] : add_left_cancel_semigroup (additive α) :=
{ add_left_cancel := @mul_left_cancel _ _,
..additive.add_semigroup }
instance [add_left_cancel_semigroup α] : left_cancel_semigroup (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_left_cancel := @add_left_cancel _ _,
..multiplicative.semigroup }
instance [right_cancel_semigroup α] : add_right_cancel_semigroup (additive α) :=
{ add_right_cancel := @mul_right_cancel _ _,
..additive.add_semigroup }
instance [add_right_cancel_semigroup α] : right_cancel_semigroup (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_right_cancel := @add_right_cancel _ _,
..multiplicative.semigroup }
instance [has_one α] : has_zero (additive α) := ⟨additive.of_mul 1⟩
@[simp] lemma of_mul_one [has_one α] : @additive.of_mul α 1 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_mul_eq_zero {A : Type*} [has_one A] {x : A} :
additive.of_mul x = 0 ↔ x = 1 := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma to_mul_zero [has_one α] : (0 : additive α).to_mul = 1 := rfl
instance [has_zero α] : has_one (multiplicative α) := ⟨multiplicative.of_add 0⟩
@[simp] lemma of_add_zero [has_zero α] : @multiplicative.of_add α 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_add_eq_one {A : Type*} [has_zero A] {x : A} :
multiplicative.of_add x = 1 ↔ x = 0 := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma to_add_one [has_zero α] : (1 : multiplicative α).to_add = 0 := rfl
instance [mul_one_class α] : add_zero_class (additive α) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
zero_add := one_mul,
add_zero := mul_one }
instance [add_zero_class α] : mul_one_class (multiplicative α) :=
{ one := 1,
mul := (*),
one_mul := zero_add,
mul_one := add_zero }
instance [h : monoid α] : add_monoid (additive α) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
nsmul := @npow α h,
nsmul_zero' := monoid.npow_zero',
nsmul_succ' := monoid.npow_succ',
..additive.add_zero_class,
..additive.add_semigroup }
instance [h : add_monoid α] : monoid (multiplicative α) :=
{ one := 1,
mul := (*),
npow := @nsmul α h,
npow_zero' := add_monoid.nsmul_zero',
npow_succ' := add_monoid.nsmul_succ',
..multiplicative.mul_one_class,
..multiplicative.semigroup }
instance [left_cancel_monoid α] : add_left_cancel_monoid (additive α) :=
{ .. additive.add_monoid, .. additive.add_left_cancel_semigroup }
instance [add_left_cancel_monoid α] : left_cancel_monoid (multiplicative α) :=
{ .. multiplicative.monoid, .. multiplicative.left_cancel_semigroup }
instance [right_cancel_monoid α] : add_right_cancel_monoid (additive α) :=
{ .. additive.add_monoid, .. additive.add_right_cancel_semigroup }
instance [add_right_cancel_monoid α] : right_cancel_monoid (multiplicative α) :=
{ .. multiplicative.monoid, .. multiplicative.right_cancel_semigroup }
instance [comm_monoid α] : add_comm_monoid (additive α) :=
{ .. additive.add_monoid, .. additive.add_comm_semigroup }
instance [add_comm_monoid α] : comm_monoid (multiplicative α) :=
{ ..multiplicative.monoid, .. multiplicative.comm_semigroup }
instance [has_inv α] : has_neg (additive α) := ⟨λ x, multiplicative.of_add x.to_mul⁻¹⟩
@[simp] lemma of_mul_inv [has_inv α] (x : α) : additive.of_mul x⁻¹ = -(additive.of_mul x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_mul_neg [has_inv α] (x : additive α) : (-x).to_mul = x.to_mul⁻¹ := rfl
instance [has_neg α] : has_inv (multiplicative α) := ⟨λ x, additive.of_mul (-x.to_add)⟩
@[simp] lemma of_add_neg [has_neg α] (x : α) :
multiplicative.of_add (-x) = (multiplicative.of_add x)⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_add_inv [has_neg α] (x : multiplicative α) :
(x⁻¹).to_add = -x.to_add := rfl
instance additive.has_sub [has_div α] : has_sub (additive α) :=
{ sub := λ x y, additive.of_mul (x.to_mul / y.to_mul) }
instance multiplicative.has_div [has_sub α] : has_div (multiplicative α) :=
{ div := λ x y, multiplicative.of_add (x.to_add - y.to_add) }
@[simp] lemma of_add_sub [has_sub α] (x y : α) :
multiplicative.of_add (x - y) = multiplicative.of_add x / multiplicative.of_add y :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_add_div [has_sub α] (x y : multiplicative α) :
(x / y).to_add = x.to_add - y.to_add :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma of_mul_div [has_div α] (x y : α) :
additive.of_mul (x / y) = additive.of_mul x - additive.of_mul y :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_mul_sub [has_div α] (x y : additive α) :
(x - y).to_mul = x.to_mul / y.to_mul :=
rfl
instance [div_inv_monoid α] : sub_neg_monoid (additive α) :=
{ sub_eq_add_neg := @div_eq_mul_inv α _,
gsmul := @gpow α _,
gsmul_zero' := div_inv_monoid.gpow_zero',
gsmul_succ' := div_inv_monoid.gpow_succ',
gsmul_neg' := div_inv_monoid.gpow_neg',
.. additive.has_neg, .. additive.has_sub, .. additive.add_monoid }
instance [sub_neg_monoid α] : div_inv_monoid (multiplicative α) :=
{ div_eq_mul_inv := @sub_eq_add_neg α _,
gpow := @gsmul α _,
gpow_zero' := sub_neg_monoid.gsmul_zero',
gpow_succ' := sub_neg_monoid.gsmul_succ',
gpow_neg' := sub_neg_monoid.gsmul_neg',
.. multiplicative.has_inv, .. multiplicative.has_div, .. multiplicative.monoid }
instance [group α] : add_group (additive α) :=
{ add_left_neg := @mul_left_inv α _,
.. additive.sub_neg_monoid }
instance [add_group α] : group (multiplicative α) :=
{ mul_left_inv := @add_left_neg α _,
.. multiplicative.div_inv_monoid }
instance [comm_group α] : add_comm_group (additive α) :=
{ .. additive.add_group, .. additive.add_comm_monoid }
instance [add_comm_group α] : comm_group (multiplicative α) :=
{ .. multiplicative.group, .. multiplicative.comm_monoid }
/-- Reinterpret `α →+ β` as `multiplicative α →* multiplicative β`. -/
def add_monoid_hom.to_multiplicative [add_zero_class α] [add_zero_class β] :
(α →+ β) ≃ (multiplicative α →* multiplicative β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2, f.3⟩, λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2, f.3⟩, λ x, by { ext, refl, }, λ x, by { ext, refl, }⟩
/-- Reinterpret `α →* β` as `additive α →+ additive β`. -/
def monoid_hom.to_additive [mul_one_class α] [mul_one_class β] :
(α →* β) ≃ (additive α →+ additive β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2, f.3⟩, λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2, f.3⟩, λ x, by { ext, refl, }, λ x, by { ext, refl, }⟩
/-- Reinterpret `additive α →+ β` as `α →* multiplicative β`. -/
def add_monoid_hom.to_multiplicative' [mul_one_class α] [add_zero_class β] :
(additive α →+ β) ≃ (α →* multiplicative β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2, f.3⟩, λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2, f.3⟩, λ x, by { ext, refl, }, λ x, by { ext, refl, }⟩
/-- Reinterpret `α →* multiplicative β` as `additive α →+ β`. -/
def monoid_hom.to_additive' [mul_one_class α] [add_zero_class β] :
(α →* multiplicative β) ≃ (additive α →+ β) :=
add_monoid_hom.to_multiplicative'.symm
/-- Reinterpret `α →+ additive β` as `multiplicative α →* β`. -/
def add_monoid_hom.to_multiplicative'' [add_zero_class α] [mul_one_class β] :
(α →+ additive β) ≃ (multiplicative α →* β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2, f.3⟩, λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2, f.3⟩, λ x, by { ext, refl, }, λ x, by { ext, refl, }⟩
/-- Reinterpret `multiplicative α →* β` as `α →+ additive β`. -/
def monoid_hom.to_additive'' [add_zero_class α] [mul_one_class β] :
(multiplicative α →* β) ≃ (α →+ additive β) :=
add_monoid_hom.to_multiplicative''.symm
/-- If `α` has some multiplicative structure and coerces to a function,
then `additive α` should also coerce to the same function.
This allows `additive` to be used on bundled function types with a multiplicative structure, which
is often used for composition, without affecting the behavior of the function itself.
-/
instance additive.has_coe_to_fun {α : Type*} [has_coe_to_fun α] :
has_coe_to_fun (additive α) :=
⟨λ a, has_coe_to_fun.F a.to_mul, λ a, coe_fn a.to_mul⟩
/-- If `α` has some additive structure and coerces to a function,
then `multiplicative α` should also coerce to the same function.
This allows `multiplicative` to be used on bundled function types with an additive structure, which
is often used for composition, without affecting the behavior of the function itself.
-/
instance multiplicative.has_coe_to_fun {α : Type*} [has_coe_to_fun α] :
has_coe_to_fun (multiplicative α) :=
⟨λ a, has_coe_to_fun.F a.to_add, λ a, coe_fn a.to_add⟩
|
d9d10fb828e4fde56dc61ebe0dd59e024339097b | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/order/filter/partial.lean | 9d143e075a32700b4d376beb91e9a4fda427731c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,446 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
Extends `tendsto` to relations and partial functions.
-/
import order.filter.basic
universes u v w
namespace filter
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open_locale filter
/-
Relations.
-/
def rmap (r : rel α β) (f : filter α) : filter β :=
{ sets := {s | r.core s ∈ f},
univ_sets := by { simp [rel.core], apply univ_mem_sets },
sets_of_superset := assume s t hs st, mem_sets_of_superset hs $ rel.core_mono _ st,
inter_sets := by { simp [set.preimage, rel.core_inter], exact λ s t, inter_mem_sets } }
theorem rmap_sets (r : rel α β) (f : filter α) : (rmap r f).sets = r.core ⁻¹' f.sets := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_rmap (r : rel α β) (l : filter α) (s : set β) :
s ∈ l.rmap r ↔ r.core s ∈ l :=
iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem rmap_rmap (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) (l : filter α) :
rmap s (rmap r l) = rmap (r.comp s) l :=
filter_eq $
by simp [rmap_sets, set.preimage, rel.core_comp]
@[simp]
lemma rmap_compose (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) : rmap s ∘ rmap r = rmap (r.comp s) :=
funext $ rmap_rmap _ _
def rtendsto (r : rel α β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) := l₁.rmap r ≤ l₂
theorem rtendsto_def (r : rel α β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) :
rtendsto r l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, r.core s ∈ l₁ :=
iff.rfl
def rcomap (r : rel α β) (f : filter β) : filter α :=
{ sets := rel.image (λ s t, r.core s ⊆ t) f.sets,
univ_sets := ⟨set.univ, univ_mem_sets, set.subset_univ _⟩,
sets_of_superset := assume a b ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab, ⟨a', ha', set.subset.trans ma'a ab⟩,
inter_sets := assume a b ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩,
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem_sets ha₁ hb₁,
set.subset.trans (by rw rel.core_inter)
(set.inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂)⟩ }
theorem rcomap_sets (r : rel α β) (f : filter β) :
(rcomap r f).sets = rel.image (λ s t, r.core s ⊆ t) f.sets := rfl
@[simp]
theorem rcomap_rcomap (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) (l : filter γ) :
rcomap r (rcomap s l) = rcomap (r.comp s) l :=
filter_eq $
begin
ext t, simp [rcomap_sets, rel.image, rel.core_comp], split,
{ rintros ⟨u, ⟨v, vsets, hv⟩, h⟩,
exact ⟨v, vsets, set.subset.trans (rel.core_mono _ hv) h⟩ },
rintros ⟨t, tsets, ht⟩,
exact ⟨rel.core s t, ⟨t, tsets, set.subset.refl _⟩, ht⟩
end
@[simp]
lemma rcomap_compose (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) : rcomap r ∘ rcomap s = rcomap (r.comp s) :=
funext $ rcomap_rcomap _ _
theorem rtendsto_iff_le_comap (r : rel α β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) :
rtendsto r l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂.rcomap r :=
begin
rw rtendsto_def,
change (∀ (s : set β), s ∈ l₂.sets → rel.core r s ∈ l₁) ↔ l₁ ≤ rcomap r l₂,
simp [filter.le_def, rcomap, rel.mem_image], split,
intros h s t tl₂ h',
{ exact mem_sets_of_superset (h t tl₂) h' },
intros h t tl₂,
apply h _ t tl₂ (set.subset.refl _),
end
-- Interestingly, there does not seem to be a way to express this relation using a forward map.
-- Given a filter `f` on `α`, we want a filter `f'` on `β` such that `r.preimage s ∈ f` if
-- and only if `s ∈ f'`. But the intersection of two sets satsifying the lhs may be empty.
def rcomap' (r : rel α β) (f : filter β) : filter α :=
{ sets := rel.image (λ s t, r.preimage s ⊆ t) f.sets,
univ_sets := ⟨set.univ, univ_mem_sets, set.subset_univ _⟩,
sets_of_superset := assume a b ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab, ⟨a', ha', set.subset.trans ma'a ab⟩,
inter_sets := assume a b ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩,
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem_sets ha₁ hb₁,
set.subset.trans (@rel.preimage_inter _ _ r _ _)
(set.inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂)⟩ }
@[simp]
lemma mem_rcomap' (r : rel α β) (l : filter β) (s : set α) :
s ∈ l.rcomap' r ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, rel.preimage r t ⊆ s :=
iff.rfl
theorem rcomap'_sets (r : rel α β) (f : filter β) :
(rcomap' r f).sets = rel.image (λ s t, r.preimage s ⊆ t) f.sets := rfl
@[simp]
theorem rcomap'_rcomap' (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) (l : filter γ) :
rcomap' r (rcomap' s l) = rcomap' (r.comp s) l :=
filter_eq $
begin
ext t, simp [rcomap'_sets, rel.image, rel.preimage_comp], split,
{ rintros ⟨u, ⟨v, vsets, hv⟩, h⟩,
exact ⟨v, vsets, set.subset.trans (rel.preimage_mono _ hv) h⟩ },
rintros ⟨t, tsets, ht⟩,
exact ⟨rel.preimage s t, ⟨t, tsets, set.subset.refl _⟩, ht⟩
end
@[simp]
lemma rcomap'_compose (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) : rcomap' r ∘ rcomap' s = rcomap' (r.comp s) :=
funext $ rcomap'_rcomap' _ _
def rtendsto' (r : rel α β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) := l₁ ≤ l₂.rcomap' r
theorem rtendsto'_def (r : rel α β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) :
rtendsto' r l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, r.preimage s ∈ l₁ :=
begin
unfold rtendsto', unfold rcomap', simp [le_def, rel.mem_image], split,
{ intros h s hs, apply (h _ _ hs (set.subset.refl _)) },
intros h s t ht h', apply mem_sets_of_superset (h t ht) h'
end
theorem tendsto_iff_rtendsto (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) (f : α → β) :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ rtendsto (function.graph f) l₁ l₂ :=
by { simp [tendsto_def, function.graph, rtendsto_def, rel.core, set.preimage] }
theorem tendsto_iff_rtendsto' (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) (f : α → β) :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ rtendsto' (function.graph f) l₁ l₂ :=
by { simp [tendsto_def, function.graph, rtendsto'_def, rel.preimage_def, set.preimage] }
/-
Partial functions.
-/
def pmap (f : α →. β) (l : filter α) : filter β :=
filter.rmap f.graph' l
@[simp]
lemma mem_pmap (f : α →. β) (l : filter α) (s : set β) : s ∈ l.pmap f ↔ f.core s ∈ l :=
iff.rfl
def ptendsto (f : α →. β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) := l₁.pmap f ≤ l₂
theorem ptendsto_def (f : α →. β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) :
ptendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, f.core s ∈ l₁ :=
iff.rfl
theorem ptendsto_iff_rtendsto (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) (f : α →. β) :
ptendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ rtendsto f.graph' l₁ l₂ :=
iff.rfl
theorem pmap_res (l : filter α) (s : set α) (f : α → β) :
pmap (pfun.res f s) l = map f (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
filter_eq $
begin
apply set.ext, intro t, simp [pfun.core_res], split,
{ intro h, constructor, split, { exact h },
constructor, split, { reflexivity },
simp [set.inter_distrib_right], apply set.inter_subset_left },
rintro ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, h₃⟩, apply mem_sets_of_superset h₁, rw ← set.inter_subset,
exact set.subset.trans (set.inter_subset_inter_right _ h₂) h₃
end
theorem tendsto_iff_ptendsto (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) (s : set α) (f : α → β) :
tendsto f (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 s) l₂ ↔ ptendsto (pfun.res f s) l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [tendsto, ptendsto, pmap_res]
theorem tendsto_iff_ptendsto_univ (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) (f : α → β) :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ptendsto (pfun.res f set.univ) l₁ l₂ :=
by { rw ← tendsto_iff_ptendsto, simp [principal_univ] }
def pcomap' (f : α →. β) (l : filter β) : filter α :=
filter.rcomap' f.graph' l
def ptendsto' (f : α →. β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) := l₁ ≤ l₂.rcomap' f.graph'
theorem ptendsto'_def (f : α →. β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) :
ptendsto' f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, f.preimage s ∈ l₁ :=
rtendsto'_def _ _ _
theorem ptendsto_of_ptendsto' {f : α →. β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} :
ptendsto' f l₁ l₂ → ptendsto f l₁ l₂ :=
begin
rw [ptendsto_def, ptendsto'_def],
assume h s sl₂,
exacts mem_sets_of_superset (h s sl₂) (pfun.preimage_subset_core _ _),
end
theorem ptendsto'_of_ptendsto {f : α →. β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} (h : f.dom ∈ l₁) :
ptendsto f l₁ l₂ → ptendsto' f l₁ l₂ :=
begin
rw [ptendsto_def, ptendsto'_def],
assume h' s sl₂,
rw pfun.preimage_eq,
show pfun.core f s ∩ pfun.dom f ∈ l₁,
exact inter_mem_sets (h' s sl₂) h
end
end filter
|
7d9fc81085041368381abc073729c5247681d6a2 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/lake/Lake/Config/Glob.lean | 0346873edcf5bf1464b8c8637e177f49ddc53d2e | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,727 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Mac Malone
-/
import Lean.Util.Path
import Lake.Util.Name
open Lean (Name)
open System (FilePath)
namespace Lake
/-- A specification of a set of module names. -/
inductive Glob
/-- Selects just the specified module name. -/
| one : Name → Glob
/-- Selects all submodules of the specified module, but not the module itself. -/
| submodules : Name → Glob
/-- Selects the specified module and all submodules. -/
| andSubmodules : Name → Glob
deriving Inhabited, Repr
instance : Coe Name Glob := ⟨Glob.one⟩
partial def forEachModuleIn [Monad m] [MonadLiftT IO m]
(dir : FilePath) (f : Name → m PUnit) (ext := "lean") : m PUnit := do
for entry in (← dir.readDir) do
if (← liftM (m := IO) <| entry.path.isDir) then
let n := Name.mkSimple entry.fileName
let r := FilePath.withExtension entry.fileName ext
if (← liftM (m := IO) r.pathExists) then f n
forEachModuleIn entry.path (f <| n ++ ·)
else if entry.path.extension == some ext then
f <| Name.mkSimple <| FilePath.withExtension entry.fileName "" |>.toString
namespace Glob
def «matches» (m : Name) : (self : Glob) → Bool
| one n => n == m
| submodules n => n.isPrefixOf m && n != m
| andSubmodules n => n.isPrefixOf m
@[inline] nonrec def forEachModuleIn [Monad m] [MonadLiftT IO m]
(dir : FilePath) (f : Name → m PUnit) : (self : Glob) → m PUnit
| one n => f n
| submodules n =>
forEachModuleIn (Lean.modToFilePath dir n "") (f <| n ++ ·)
| andSubmodules n =>
f n *> forEachModuleIn (Lean.modToFilePath dir n "") (f <| n ++ ·)
|
b7166c87bfb61e65353ac4363d3dc0c5067113d4 | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /library/init/category/applicative.lean | 78b659dc1e49168617e585b2328232229baf4d4f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,993 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import init.category.functor
open function
universes u v
class has_pure (f : Type u → Type v) :=
(pure : Π {α : Type u}, α → f α)
-- make `f` implicit, like in Haskell
@[reducible, inline] def pure {f : Type u → Type v} [has_pure f] {α : Type u} : α → f α :=
has_pure.pure f
class has_seq (f : Type u → Type v) : Type (max u+1 v) :=
(seq : Π {α β : Type u}, f (α → β) → f α → f β)
infixl ` <*> `:60 := has_seq.seq
class has_seq_left (f : Type u → Type v) : Type (max u+1 v) :=
(seq_left : Π {α β : Type u}, f α → f β → f α)
infixl ` <* `:60 := has_seq_left.seq_left
class has_seq_right (f : Type u → Type v) : Type (max u+1 v) :=
(seq_right : Π {α β : Type u}, f α → f β → f β)
infixl ` *> `:60 := has_seq_right.seq_right
section
set_option auto_param.check_exists false
class applicative (f : Type u → Type v) extends functor f, has_pure f, has_seq f, has_seq_left f, has_seq_right f :=
(map := λ _ _ x y, pure x <*> y)
(seq_left := λ α β a b, const β <$> a <*> b)
(seq_right := λ α β a b, const α id <$> a <*> b)
(seq_left_eq : ∀ {α β : Type u} (a : f α) (b : f β), a <* b = const β <$> a <*> b . control_laws_tac)
(seq_right_eq : ∀ {α β : Type u} (a : f α) (b : f β), a *> b = const α id <$> a <*> b . control_laws_tac)
-- applicative laws
(pure_seq_eq_map : ∀ {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (x : f α), pure g <*> x = g <$> x) -- . control_laws_tac)
(map_pure : ∀ {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (x : α), g <$> pure x = pure (g x))
(seq_pure : ∀ {α β : Type u} (g : f (α → β)) (x : α), g <*> pure x = (λ g : α → β, g x) <$> g)
(seq_assoc : ∀ {α β γ : Type u} (x : f α) (g : f (α → β)) (h : f (β → γ)), h <*> (g <*> x) = (@comp α β γ <$> h) <*> g <*> x)
-- defaulted functor law
(map_comp :=
λ α β γ g h x, calc
(h ∘ g) <$> x = pure (h ∘ g) <*> x : eq.symm $ pure_seq_eq_map _ _
... = (comp h <$> pure g) <*> x : eq.rec rfl $ map_pure (comp h) g
... = pure (@comp α β γ h) <*> pure g <*> x : eq.rec rfl $ eq.symm $ pure_seq_eq_map (comp h) (pure g)
... = (@comp α β γ <$> pure h) <*> pure g <*> x : eq.rec rfl $ map_pure (@comp α β γ) h
... = pure h <*> (pure g <*> x) : eq.symm $ seq_assoc _ _ _
... = h <$> (pure g <*> x) : pure_seq_eq_map _ _
... = h <$> g <$> x : congr_arg _ $ pure_seq_eq_map _ _)
end
-- applicative "law" derivable from other laws
theorem applicative.pure_id_seq {α β : Type u} {f : Type u → Type v} [applicative f] (x : f α) : pure id <*> x = x :=
eq.trans (applicative.pure_seq_eq_map _ _) (functor.id_map _)
|
213751aaed359d5a74396d03227a9e7e1bc284a6 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /archive/imo/imo2001_q2.lean | c3548c9849ebb97c136c4868caa529256605419d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,663 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen
-/
import analysis.special_functions.pow
/-!
# IMO 2001 Q2
Let $a$, $b$, $c$ be positive reals. Prove that
$$
\frac{a}{\sqrt{a^2 + 8bc}} +
\frac{b}{\sqrt{b^2 + 8ca}} +
\frac{c}{\sqrt{c^2 + 8ab}} ≥ 1.
$$
## Solution
This proof is based on the bound
$$
\frac{a}{\sqrt{a^2 + 8bc}} ≥
\frac{a^{\frac43}}{a^{\frac43} + b^{\frac43} + c^{\frac43}}.
$$
-/
open real
variables {a b c : ℝ}
lemma denom_pos (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) :
0 < a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 + c ^ 4 :=
add_pos (add_pos (pow_pos ha 4) (pow_pos hb 4)) (pow_pos hc 4)
lemma bound (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) :
a ^ 4 / (a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 + c ^ 4) ≤
a ^ 3 / sqrt ((a ^ 3) ^ 2 + 8 * b ^ 3 * c ^ 3) :=
begin
have hsqrt := add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (sq_nonneg (a ^ 3))
(mul_pos (mul_pos (bit0_pos zero_lt_four) (pow_pos hb 3)) (pow_pos hc 3)),
have hdenom := denom_pos ha hb hc,
rw div_le_div_iff hdenom (sqrt_pos.mpr hsqrt),
conv_lhs { rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc] },
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (pow_pos ha 3).le,
apply le_of_pow_le_pow _ hdenom.le zero_lt_two,
rw [mul_pow, sq_sqrt hsqrt.le, ← sub_nonneg],
calc (a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 + c ^ 4) ^ 2 - a ^ 2 * ((a ^ 3) ^ 2 + 8 * b ^ 3 * c ^ 3)
= 2 * (a ^ 2 * (b ^ 2 - c ^ 2)) ^ 2 + (b ^ 4 - c ^ 4) ^ 2 +
(2 * (a ^ 2 * b * c - b ^ 2 * c ^ 2)) ^ 2 : by ring
... ≥ 0 : add_nonneg (add_nonneg (mul_nonneg zero_le_two (sq_nonneg _))
(sq_nonneg _)) (sq_nonneg _)
end
theorem imo2001_q2' (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) :
1 ≤ a ^ 3 / sqrt ((a ^ 3) ^ 2 + 8 * b ^ 3 * c ^ 3) +
b ^ 3 / sqrt ((b ^ 3) ^ 2 + 8 * c ^ 3 * a ^ 3) +
c ^ 3 / sqrt ((c ^ 3) ^ 2 + 8 * a ^ 3 * b ^ 3) :=
have h₁ : b ^ 4 + c ^ 4 + a ^ 4 = a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 + c ^ 4,
by rw [add_comm, ← add_assoc],
have h₂ : c ^ 4 + a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 + c ^ 4,
by rw [add_assoc, add_comm],
calc _ ≥ _ : add_le_add (add_le_add (bound ha hb hc) (bound hb hc ha)) (bound hc ha hb)
... = 1 : by rw [h₁, h₂, ← add_div, ← add_div, div_self $ ne_of_gt $ denom_pos ha hb hc]
theorem imo2001_q2 (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) :
1 ≤ a / sqrt (a ^ 2 + 8 * b * c) +
b / sqrt (b ^ 2 + 8 * c * a) +
c / sqrt (c ^ 2 + 8 * a * b) :=
have h3 : ∀ {x : ℝ}, 0 < x → (x ^ (3 : ℝ)⁻¹) ^ 3 = x :=
λ x hx, show ↑3 = (3 : ℝ), by norm_num ▸ rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat hx.le zero_lt_three,
calc 1 ≤ _ : imo2001_q2' (rpow_pos_of_pos ha _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hb _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hc _)
... = _ : by rw [h3 ha, h3 hb, h3 hc]
|
a3eb73e73778e5e38755531c234d07d2131e3b8c | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /src/Lean/ProjFns.lean | bfa35654ab17d74056eb8d5f94b9b5b8452c97cf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,258 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Environment
namespace Lean
/- Given a structure `S`, Lean automatically creates an auxiliary definition (projection function)
for each field. This structure caches information about these auxiliary definitions. -/
structure ProjectionFunctionInfo :=
(ctorName : Name) -- Constructor associated with the auxiliary projection function.
(nparams : Nat) -- Number of parameters in the structure
(i : Nat) -- The field index associated with the auxiliary projection function.
(fromClass : Bool) -- `true` if the structure is a class
@[export lean_mk_projection_info]
def mkProjectionInfoEx (ctorName : Name) (nparams : Nat) (i : Nat) (fromClass : Bool) : ProjectionFunctionInfo :=
{ctorName := ctorName, nparams := nparams, i := i, fromClass := fromClass }
@[export lean_projection_info_from_class]
def ProjectionFunctionInfo.fromClassEx (info : ProjectionFunctionInfo) : Bool := info.fromClass
instance ProjectionFunctionInfo.inhabited : Inhabited ProjectionFunctionInfo :=
⟨{ ctorName := arbitrary _, nparams := arbitrary _, i := 0, fromClass := false }⟩
def mkProjectionFnInfoExtension : IO (SimplePersistentEnvExtension (Name × ProjectionFunctionInfo) (NameMap ProjectionFunctionInfo)) :=
registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
name := `projinfo,
addImportedFn := fun as => {},
addEntryFn := fun s p => s.insert p.1 p.2,
toArrayFn := fun es => es.toArray.qsort (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1)
}
@[init mkProjectionFnInfoExtension]
constant projectionFnInfoExt : SimplePersistentEnvExtension (Name × ProjectionFunctionInfo) (NameMap ProjectionFunctionInfo) := arbitrary _
@[export lean_add_projection_info]
def addProjectionFnInfo (env : Environment) (projName : Name) (ctorName : Name) (nparams : Nat) (i : Nat) (fromClass : Bool) : Environment :=
projectionFnInfoExt.addEntry env (projName, { ctorName := ctorName, nparams := nparams, i := i, fromClass := fromClass })
namespace Environment
@[export lean_get_projection_info]
def getProjectionFnInfo? (env : Environment) (projName : Name) : Option ProjectionFunctionInfo :=
match env.getModuleIdxFor? projName with
| some modIdx =>
match (projectionFnInfoExt.getModuleEntries env modIdx).binSearch (projName, arbitrary _) (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1) with
| some e => some e.2
| none => none
| none => (projectionFnInfoExt.getState env).find? projName
def isProjectionFn (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Bool :=
match env.getModuleIdxFor? n with
| some modIdx => (projectionFnInfoExt.getModuleEntries env modIdx).binSearchContains (n, arbitrary _) (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1)
| none => (projectionFnInfoExt.getState env).contains n
/-- If `projName` is the name of a projection function, return the associated structure name -/
def getProjectionStructureName? (env : Environment) (projName : Name) : Option Name :=
match env.getProjectionFnInfo? projName with
| none => none
| some projInfo =>
match env.find? projInfo.ctorName with
| some (ConstantInfo.ctorInfo val) => some val.induct
| _ => none
end Environment
end Lean
|
488bc8de99de0e40c545ba4cff8fce76e9dfe0b1 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/order/complete_boolean_algebra.lean | dd590f754bc040acd11be8e9cc4944cab29e302b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,417 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import order.complete_lattice
import order.directed
import logic.equiv.set
/-!
# Frames, completely distributive lattices and Boolean algebras
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we define and provide API for frames, completely distributive lattices and completely
distributive Boolean algebras.
## Typeclasses
* `order.frame`: Frame: A complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`.
* `order.coframe`: Coframe: A complete lattice whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`.
* `complete_distrib_lattice`: Completely distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose `⊓` and `⊔`
distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `complete_boolean_algebra`: Completely distributive Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
A set of opens gives rise to a topological space precisely if it forms a frame. Such a frame is also
completely distributive, but not all frames are. `filter` is a coframe but not a completely
distributive lattice.
## TODO
Add instances for `prod`
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Complete Heyting algebra*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_Heyting_algebra)
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
-/
set_option old_structure_cmd true
open function set
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-- A frame, aka complete Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
class order.frame (α : Type*) extends complete_lattice α :=
(inf_Sup_le_supr_inf (a : α) (s : set α) : a ⊓ Sup s ≤ ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b)
/-- A coframe, aka complete Brouwer algebra or complete co-Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice
whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
class order.coframe (α : Type*) extends complete_lattice α :=
(infi_sup_le_sup_Inf (a : α) (s : set α) : (⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b) ≤ a ⊔ Inf s)
open order
/-- A completely distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⊔` and `⊓` respectively
distribute over `⨅` and `⨆`. -/
class complete_distrib_lattice (α : Type*) extends frame α :=
(infi_sup_le_sup_Inf : ∀ a s, (⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b) ≤ a ⊔ Inf s)
@[priority 100] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance complete_distrib_lattice.to_coframe [complete_distrib_lattice α] : coframe α :=
{ .. ‹complete_distrib_lattice α› }
section frame
variables [frame α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
instance order_dual.coframe : coframe αᵒᵈ :=
{ infi_sup_le_sup_Inf := frame.inf_Sup_le_supr_inf, ..order_dual.complete_lattice α }
lemma inf_Sup_eq : a ⊓ Sup s = ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b :=
(frame.inf_Sup_le_supr_inf _ _).antisymm supr_inf_le_inf_Sup
lemma Sup_inf_eq : Sup s ⊓ b = ⨆ a ∈ s, a ⊓ b :=
by simpa only [inf_comm] using @inf_Sup_eq α _ s b
lemma supr_inf_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ a = ⨆ i, f i ⊓ a :=
by rw [supr, Sup_inf_eq, supr_range]
lemma inf_supr_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : a ⊓ (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i :=
by simpa only [inf_comm] using supr_inf_eq f a
lemma bsupr_inf_eq {f : Π i, κ i → α} (a : α) : (⨆ i j, f i j) ⊓ a = ⨆ i j, f i j ⊓ a :=
by simp only [supr_inf_eq]
lemma inf_bsupr_eq {f : Π i, κ i → α} (a : α) : a ⊓ (⨆ i j, f i j) = ⨆ i j, a ⊓ f i j :=
by simp only [inf_supr_eq]
lemma supr_inf_supr {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α} :
(⨆ i, f i) ⊓ (⨆ j, g j) = ⨆ i : ι × ι', f i.1 ⊓ g i.2 :=
by simp only [inf_supr_eq, supr_inf_eq, supr_prod]
lemma bsupr_inf_bsupr {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α} {s : set ι} {t : set ι'} :
(⨆ i ∈ s, f i) ⊓ (⨆ j ∈ t, g j) = ⨆ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, f (p : ι × ι').1 ⊓ g p.2 :=
begin
simp only [supr_subtype', supr_inf_supr],
exact (equiv.surjective _).supr_congr (equiv.set.prod s t).symm (λ x, rfl)
end
lemma Sup_inf_Sup : Sup s ⊓ Sup t = ⨆ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : α × α).1 ⊓ p.2 :=
by simp only [Sup_eq_supr, bsupr_inf_bsupr]
lemma supr_disjoint_iff {f : ι → α} : disjoint (⨆ i, f i) a ↔ ∀ i, disjoint (f i) a :=
by simp only [disjoint_iff, supr_inf_eq, supr_eq_bot]
lemma disjoint_supr_iff {f : ι → α} : disjoint a (⨆ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, disjoint a (f i) :=
by simpa only [disjoint.comm] using supr_disjoint_iff
lemma supr₂_disjoint_iff {f : Π i, κ i → α} :
disjoint (⨆ i j, f i j) a ↔ ∀ i j, disjoint (f i j) a :=
by simp_rw supr_disjoint_iff
lemma disjoint_supr₂_iff {f : Π i, κ i → α} :
disjoint a (⨆ i j, f i j) ↔ ∀ i j, disjoint a (f i j) :=
by simp_rw disjoint_supr_iff
lemma Sup_disjoint_iff {s : set α} : disjoint (Sup s) a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, disjoint b a :=
by simp only [disjoint_iff, Sup_inf_eq, supr_eq_bot]
lemma disjoint_Sup_iff {s : set α} : disjoint a (Sup s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, disjoint a b :=
by simpa only [disjoint.comm] using Sup_disjoint_iff
lemma supr_inf_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [preorder ι] [is_directed ι (≤)] {f g : ι → α}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) :
(⨆ i, f i ⊓ g i) = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ (⨆ i, g i) :=
begin
refine (le_supr_inf_supr f g).antisymm _,
rw [supr_inf_supr],
refine supr_mono' (λ i, _),
rcases directed_of (≤) i.1 i.2 with ⟨j, h₁, h₂⟩,
exact ⟨j, inf_le_inf (hf h₁) (hg h₂)⟩
end
lemma supr_inf_of_antitone {ι : Type*} [preorder ι] [is_directed ι (swap (≤))] {f g : ι → α}
(hf : antitone f) (hg : antitone g) :
(⨆ i, f i ⊓ g i) = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ (⨆ i, g i) :=
@supr_inf_of_monotone α _ ιᵒᵈ _ _ f g hf.dual_left hg.dual_left
instance pi.frame {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [Π i, frame (π i)] : frame (Π i, π i) :=
{ inf_Sup_le_supr_inf := λ a s i,
by simp only [complete_lattice.Sup, Sup_apply, supr_apply, pi.inf_apply, inf_supr_eq,
← supr_subtype''],
..pi.complete_lattice }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance frame.to_distrib_lattice : distrib_lattice α :=
distrib_lattice.of_inf_sup_le $ λ a b c,
by rw [←Sup_pair, ←Sup_pair, inf_Sup_eq, ←Sup_image, image_pair]
end frame
section coframe
variables [coframe α] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
instance order_dual.frame : frame αᵒᵈ :=
{ inf_Sup_le_supr_inf := coframe.infi_sup_le_sup_Inf, ..order_dual.complete_lattice α }
lemma sup_Inf_eq : a ⊔ Inf s = ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b := @inf_Sup_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma Inf_sup_eq : Inf s ⊔ b = ⨅ a ∈ s, a ⊔ b := @Sup_inf_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma infi_sup_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨅ i, f i) ⊔ a = ⨅ i, f i ⊔ a := @supr_inf_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
lemma sup_infi_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : a ⊔ (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, a ⊔ f i := @inf_supr_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
lemma binfi_sup_eq {f : Π i, κ i → α} (a : α) : (⨅ i j, f i j) ⊔ a = ⨅ i j, f i j ⊔ a :=
@bsupr_inf_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
lemma sup_binfi_eq {f : Π i, κ i → α} (a : α) : a ⊔ (⨅ i j, f i j) = ⨅ i j, a ⊔ f i j :=
@inf_bsupr_eq αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
lemma infi_sup_infi {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α} :
(⨅ i, f i) ⊔ (⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i : ι × ι', f i.1 ⊔ g i.2 :=
@supr_inf_supr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
lemma binfi_sup_binfi {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α} {s : set ι} {t : set ι'} :
(⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ⊔ (⨅ j ∈ t, g j) = ⨅ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, f (p : ι × ι').1 ⊔ g p.2 :=
@bsupr_inf_bsupr αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
theorem Inf_sup_Inf : Inf s ⊔ Inf t = (⨅ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : α × α).1 ⊔ p.2) :=
@Sup_inf_Sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma infi_sup_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [preorder ι] [is_directed ι (swap (≤))] {f g : ι → α}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) :
(⨅ i, f i ⊔ g i) = (⨅ i, f i) ⊔ (⨅ i, g i) :=
supr_inf_of_antitone hf.dual_right hg.dual_right
lemma infi_sup_of_antitone {ι : Type*} [preorder ι] [is_directed ι (≤)] {f g : ι → α}
(hf : antitone f) (hg : antitone g) :
(⨅ i, f i ⊔ g i) = (⨅ i, f i) ⊔ (⨅ i, g i) :=
supr_inf_of_monotone hf.dual_right hg.dual_right
instance pi.coframe {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [Π i, coframe (π i)] : coframe (Π i, π i) :=
{ Inf := Inf,
infi_sup_le_sup_Inf := λ a s i,
by simp only [←sup_infi_eq, Inf_apply, ←infi_subtype'', infi_apply, pi.sup_apply],
..pi.complete_lattice }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance coframe.to_distrib_lattice : distrib_lattice α :=
{ le_sup_inf := λ a b c, by rw [←Inf_pair, ←Inf_pair, sup_Inf_eq, ←Inf_image, image_pair],
..‹coframe α› }
end coframe
section complete_distrib_lattice
variables [complete_distrib_lattice α] {a b : α} {s t : set α}
instance : complete_distrib_lattice αᵒᵈ := { ..order_dual.frame, ..order_dual.coframe }
instance pi.complete_distrib_lattice {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
[Π i, complete_distrib_lattice (π i)] : complete_distrib_lattice (Π i, π i) :=
{ ..pi.frame, ..pi.coframe }
end complete_distrib_lattice
/-- A complete Boolean algebra is a completely distributive Boolean algebra. -/
class complete_boolean_algebra α extends boolean_algebra α, complete_distrib_lattice α
instance pi.complete_boolean_algebra {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, complete_boolean_algebra (π i)] : complete_boolean_algebra (Π i, π i) :=
{ .. pi.boolean_algebra, .. pi.complete_distrib_lattice }
instance Prop.complete_boolean_algebra : complete_boolean_algebra Prop :=
{ infi_sup_le_sup_Inf := λ p s, iff.mp $
by simp only [forall_or_distrib_left, complete_lattice.Inf, infi_Prop_eq, sup_Prop_eq],
inf_Sup_le_supr_inf := λ p s, iff.mp $
by simp only [complete_lattice.Sup, exists_and_distrib_left, inf_Prop_eq, supr_Prop_eq],
.. Prop.boolean_algebra, .. Prop.complete_lattice }
section complete_boolean_algebra
variables [complete_boolean_algebra α] {a b : α} {s : set α} {f : ι → α}
theorem compl_infi : (infi f)ᶜ = (⨆ i, (f i)ᶜ) :=
le_antisymm
(compl_le_of_compl_le $ le_infi $ λ i, compl_le_of_compl_le $ le_supr (compl ∘ f) i)
(supr_le $ λ i, compl_le_compl $ infi_le _ _)
theorem compl_supr : (supr f)ᶜ = (⨅ i, (f i)ᶜ) :=
compl_injective (by simp [compl_infi])
lemma compl_Inf : (Inf s)ᶜ = (⨆ i ∈ s, iᶜ) := by simp only [Inf_eq_infi, compl_infi]
lemma compl_Sup : (Sup s)ᶜ = (⨅ i ∈ s, iᶜ) := by simp only [Sup_eq_supr, compl_supr]
lemma compl_Inf' : (Inf s)ᶜ = Sup (compl '' s) := compl_Inf.trans Sup_image.symm
lemma compl_Sup' : (Sup s)ᶜ = Inf (compl '' s) := compl_Sup.trans Inf_image.symm
end complete_boolean_algebra
section lift
/-- Pullback an `order.frame` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.frame [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_Sup α] [has_Inf α] [has_top α]
[has_bot α] [frame β] (f : α → β) (hf : injective f) (map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b)
(map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b) (map_Sup : ∀ s, f (Sup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a)
(map_Inf : ∀ s, f (Inf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
frame α :=
{ inf_Sup_le_supr_inf := λ a s, begin
change f (a ⊓ Sup s) ≤ f _,
rw [←Sup_image, map_inf, map_Sup s, inf_bsupr_eq],
simp_rw ←map_inf,
exact ((map_Sup _).trans supr_image).ge,
end,
..hf.complete_lattice f map_sup map_inf map_Sup map_Inf map_top map_bot }
/-- Pullback an `order.coframe` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.coframe [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_Sup α] [has_Inf α] [has_top α]
[has_bot α] [coframe β] (f : α → β) (hf : injective f) (map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b)
(map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b) (map_Sup : ∀ s, f (Sup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a)
(map_Inf : ∀ s, f (Inf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
coframe α :=
{ infi_sup_le_sup_Inf := λ a s, begin
change f _ ≤ f (a ⊔ Inf s),
rw [←Inf_image, map_sup, map_Inf s, sup_binfi_eq],
simp_rw ←map_sup,
exact ((map_Inf _).trans infi_image).le,
end,
..hf.complete_lattice f map_sup map_inf map_Sup map_Inf map_top map_bot }
/-- Pullback a `complete_distrib_lattice` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.complete_distrib_lattice [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_Sup α]
[has_Inf α] [has_top α] [has_bot α] [complete_distrib_lattice β]
(f : α → β) (hf : function.injective f) (map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b)
(map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b) (map_Sup : ∀ s, f (Sup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a)
(map_Inf : ∀ s, f (Inf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
complete_distrib_lattice α :=
{ ..hf.frame f map_sup map_inf map_Sup map_Inf map_top map_bot,
..hf.coframe f map_sup map_inf map_Sup map_Inf map_top map_bot }
/-- Pullback a `complete_boolean_algebra` along an injection. -/
@[reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def function.injective.complete_boolean_algebra [has_sup α] [has_inf α] [has_Sup α]
[has_Inf α] [has_top α] [has_bot α] [has_compl α] [has_sdiff α] [complete_boolean_algebra β]
(f : α → β) (hf : function.injective f) (map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b)
(map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b) (map_Sup : ∀ s, f (Sup s) = ⨆ a ∈ s, f a)
(map_Inf : ∀ s, f (Inf s) = ⨅ a ∈ s, f a) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥)
(map_compl : ∀ a, f aᶜ = (f a)ᶜ) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
complete_boolean_algebra α :=
{ ..hf.complete_distrib_lattice f map_sup map_inf map_Sup map_Inf map_top map_bot,
..hf.boolean_algebra f map_sup map_inf map_top map_bot map_compl map_sdiff }
end lift
namespace punit
variables (s : set punit.{u+1}) (x y : punit.{u+1})
instance : complete_boolean_algebra punit :=
by refine_struct
{ Sup := λ _, star,
Inf := λ _, star,
..punit.boolean_algebra };
intros; trivial <|> simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, not_true, and_false]
@[simp] lemma Sup_eq : Sup s = star := rfl
@[simp] lemma Inf_eq : Inf s = star := rfl
end punit
|
963b67b402f5c9e3d54a475bb009f8c88c715b4b | 1abd1ed12aa68b375cdef28959f39531c6e95b84 | /src/linear_algebra/matrix/to_lin.lean | 1395bdd864373e1a5827943357a0948d3ca41728 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jumpy4/mathlib | d3829e75173012833e9f15ac16e481e17596de0f | af36f1a35f279f0e5b3c2a77647c6bf2cfd51a13 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,508,842,818 | 1,636,203,271,000 | 1,636,203,271,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 28,745 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import data.matrix.block
import linear_algebra.matrix.finite_dimensional
import linear_algebra.std_basis
import ring_theory.algebra_tower
/-!
# Linear maps and matrices
This file defines the maps to send matrices to a linear map,
and to send linear maps between modules with a finite bases
to matrices. This defines a linear equivalence between linear maps
between finite-dimensional vector spaces and matrices indexed by
the respective bases.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `linear_map.to_matrix`: given bases `v₁ : ι → M₁` and `v₂ : κ → M₂`,
the `R`-linear equivalence from `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` to `matrix κ ι R`
* `matrix.to_lin`: the inverse of `linear_map.to_matrix`
* `linear_map.to_matrix'`: the `R`-linear equivalence from `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)`
to `matrix n m R` (with the standard basis on `n → R` and `m → R`)
* `matrix.to_lin'`: the inverse of `linear_map.to_matrix'`
* `alg_equiv_matrix`: given a basis indexed by `n`, the `R`-algebra equivalence between
`R`-endomorphisms of `M` and `matrix n n R`
## Tags
linear_map, matrix, linear_equiv, diagonal, det, trace
-/
noncomputable theory
open linear_map matrix set submodule
open_locale big_operators
open_locale matrix
universes u v w
section to_matrix'
instance {n m} [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] (R) [fintype R] :
fintype (matrix m n R) := by unfold matrix; apply_instance
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {l m n : Type*}
/-- `matrix.mul_vec M` is a linear map. -/
def matrix.mul_vec_lin [fintype n] (M : matrix m n R) : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) :=
{ to_fun := M.mul_vec,
map_add' := λ v w, funext (λ i, dot_product_add _ _ _),
map_smul' := λ c v, funext (λ i, dot_product_smul _ _ _) }
@[simp] lemma matrix.mul_vec_lin_apply [fintype n] (M : matrix m n R) (v : n → R) :
matrix.mul_vec_lin M v = M.mul_vec v := rfl
variables [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
@[simp] lemma matrix.mul_vec_std_basis (M : matrix m n R) (i j) :
M.mul_vec (std_basis R (λ _, R) j 1) i = M i j :=
begin
have : (∑ j', M i j' * if j = j' then 1 else 0) = M i j,
{ simp_rw [mul_boole, finset.sum_ite_eq, finset.mem_univ, if_true] },
convert this,
ext,
split_ifs with h; simp only [std_basis_apply],
{ rw [h, function.update_same] },
{ rw [function.update_noteq (ne.symm h), pi.zero_apply] }
end
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)` are linearly equivalent to `matrix m n R`. -/
def linear_map.to_matrix' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) ≃ₗ[R] matrix m n R :=
{ to_fun := λ f i j, f (std_basis R (λ _, R) j 1) i,
inv_fun := matrix.mul_vec_lin,
right_inv := λ M, by { ext i j, simp only [matrix.mul_vec_std_basis, matrix.mul_vec_lin_apply] },
left_inv := λ f, begin
apply (pi.basis_fun R n).ext,
intro j, ext i,
simp only [pi.basis_fun_apply, matrix.mul_vec_std_basis, matrix.mul_vec_lin_apply]
end,
map_add' := λ f g, by { ext i j, simp only [pi.add_apply, linear_map.add_apply] },
map_smul' := λ c f, by { ext i j, simp only [pi.smul_apply, linear_map.smul_apply,
ring_hom.id_apply] } }
/-- A `matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)`. -/
def matrix.to_lin' : matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) :=
linear_map.to_matrix'.symm
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_symm :
(linear_map.to_matrix'.symm : matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] _) = matrix.to_lin' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_symm :
(matrix.to_lin'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) ≃ₗ[R] _) = linear_map.to_matrix' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_to_lin' (M : matrix m n R) :
linear_map.to_matrix' (matrix.to_lin' M) = M :=
linear_map.to_matrix'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_to_matrix' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) :
matrix.to_lin' (linear_map.to_matrix' f) = f :=
matrix.to_lin'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) (i j) :
linear_map.to_matrix' f i j = f (λ j', if j' = j then 1 else 0) i :=
begin
simp only [linear_map.to_matrix', linear_equiv.coe_mk],
congr,
ext j',
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [h, std_basis_same] },
apply std_basis_ne _ _ _ _ h
end
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_apply (M : matrix m n R) (v : n → R) :
matrix.to_lin' M v = M.mul_vec v := rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_one :
matrix.to_lin' (1 : matrix n n R) = id :=
by { ext, simp [linear_map.one_apply, std_basis_apply] }
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_id :
(linear_map.to_matrix' (linear_map.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R))) = 1 :=
by { ext, rw [matrix.one_apply, linear_map.to_matrix'_apply, id_apply] }
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin'_mul [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (M : matrix l m R)
(N : matrix m n R) : matrix.to_lin' (M ⬝ N) = (matrix.to_lin' M).comp (matrix.to_lin' N) :=
by { ext, simp }
/-- Shortcut lemma for `matrix.to_lin'_mul` and `linear_map.comp_apply` -/
lemma matrix.to_lin'_mul_apply [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (M : matrix l m R)
(N : matrix m n R) (x) : matrix.to_lin' (M ⬝ N) x = (matrix.to_lin' M (matrix.to_lin' N x)) :=
by rw [matrix.to_lin'_mul, linear_map.comp_apply]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_comp [fintype l] [decidable_eq l]
(f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) (g : (l → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :
(f.comp g).to_matrix' = f.to_matrix' ⬝ g.to_matrix' :=
suffices (f.comp g) = (f.to_matrix' ⬝ g.to_matrix').to_lin',
by rw [this, linear_map.to_matrix'_to_lin'],
by rw [matrix.to_lin'_mul, matrix.to_lin'_to_matrix', matrix.to_lin'_to_matrix']
lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_mul [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
(f g : (m → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)) :
(f * g).to_matrix' = f.to_matrix' ⬝ g.to_matrix' :=
linear_map.to_matrix'_comp f g
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix'_algebra_map (x : R) :
linear_map.to_matrix' (algebra_map R (module.End R (n → R)) x) = scalar n x :=
by simp [module.algebra_map_End_eq_smul_id]
lemma matrix.ker_to_lin'_eq_bot_iff {M : matrix n n R} :
M.to_lin'.ker = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M.mul_vec v = 0 → v = 0 :=
by simp only [submodule.eq_bot_iff, linear_map.mem_ker, matrix.to_lin'_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `m → A`
and `n → A` corresponding to `M.mul_vec` and `M'.mul_vec`. -/
@[simps]
def matrix.to_lin'_of_inv [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
{M : matrix m n R} {M' : matrix n m R}
(hMM' : M ⬝ M' = 1) (hM'M : M' ⬝ M = 1) :
(m → R) ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) :=
{ to_fun := matrix.to_lin' M',
inv_fun := M.to_lin',
left_inv := λ x, by rw [← matrix.to_lin'_mul_apply, hMM', matrix.to_lin'_one, id_apply],
right_inv := λ x, by rw [← matrix.to_lin'_mul_apply, hM'M, matrix.to_lin'_one, id_apply],
.. matrix.to_lin' M' }
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are algebra equivalent to `matrix n n R`. -/
def linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
alg_equiv.of_linear_equiv linear_map.to_matrix' linear_map.to_matrix'_mul
linear_map.to_matrix'_algebra_map
/-- A `matrix n n R` is algebra equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`. -/
def matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' : matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'.symm
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_symm :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'.symm : matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] _) = matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_symm :
(matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) ≃ₐ[R] _) =
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_to_lin_alg_equiv' (M : matrix n n R) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' M) = M :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_to_matrix_alg_equiv' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' (linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' f) = f :=
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) (i j) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' f i j = f (λ j', if j' = j then 1 else 0) i :=
by simp [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv']
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_apply (M : matrix n n R) (v : n → R) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' M v = M.mul_vec v := rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_one :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' (1 : matrix n n R) = id :=
by { ext, simp [matrix.one_apply, std_basis_apply] }
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_id :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv' (linear_map.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R))) = 1 :=
by { ext, rw [matrix.one_apply, linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_apply, id_apply] }
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_mul (M N : matrix n n R) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' (M ⬝ N) =
(matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' M).comp (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' N) :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_comp (f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :
(f.comp g).to_matrix_alg_equiv' = f.to_matrix_alg_equiv' ⬝ g.to_matrix_alg_equiv' :=
suffices (f.comp g) = (f.to_matrix_alg_equiv' ⬝ g.to_matrix_alg_equiv').to_lin_alg_equiv',
by rw [this, linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_to_lin_alg_equiv'],
by rw [matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_mul, matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_to_matrix_alg_equiv',
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_to_matrix_alg_equiv']
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_mul
(f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)) :
(f * g).to_matrix_alg_equiv' = f.to_matrix_alg_equiv' ⬝ g.to_matrix_alg_equiv' :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv'_comp f g
lemma matrix.rank_vec_mul_vec {K m n : Type u} [field K] [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
(w : m → K) (v : n → K) :
rank (vec_mul_vec w v).to_lin' ≤ 1 :=
begin
rw [vec_mul_vec_eq, matrix.to_lin'_mul],
refine le_trans (rank_comp_le1 _ _) _,
refine le_trans (rank_le_domain _) _,
rw [dim_fun', ← cardinal.lift_eq_nat_iff.mpr (cardinal.fintype_card unit), cardinal.mk_unit],
exact le_of_eq (cardinal.lift_one)
end
end to_matrix'
section to_matrix
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {l m n : Type*} [fintype n] [fintype m] [decidable_eq n]
variables {M₁ M₂ : Type*} [add_comm_group M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₁] [module R M₂]
variables (v₁ : basis n R M₁) (v₂ : basis m R M₂)
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂` and matrices over `R` indexed by the bases. -/
def linear_map.to_matrix : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) ≃ₗ[R] matrix m n R :=
linear_equiv.trans (linear_equiv.arrow_congr v₁.equiv_fun v₂.equiv_fun) linear_map.to_matrix'
/-- `linear_map.to_matrix'` is a particular case of `linear_map.to_matrix`, for the standard basis
`pi.basis_fun R n`. -/
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_eq_to_matrix' :
linear_map.to_matrix (pi.basis_fun R n) (pi.basis_fun R n) = linear_map.to_matrix' :=
rfl
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between matrices over `R` indexed by the bases and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂`. -/
def matrix.to_lin : matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
(linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂).symm
/-- `matrix.to_lin'` is a particular case of `matrix.to_lin`, for the standard basis
`pi.basis_fun R n`. -/
lemma matrix.to_lin_eq_to_lin' :
matrix.to_lin (pi.basis_fun R n) (pi.basis_fun R n) = matrix.to_lin' :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_symm :
(linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂).symm = matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_symm :
(matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂).symm = linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_to_matrix (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ (linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ f) = f :=
by rw [← matrix.to_lin_symm, linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_to_lin (M : matrix m n R) :
linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ (matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ M) = M :=
by rw [← matrix.to_lin_symm, linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ f i j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
begin
rw [linear_map.to_matrix, linear_equiv.trans_apply, linear_map.to_matrix'_apply,
linear_equiv.arrow_congr_apply, basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply, finset.sum_eq_single j,
if_pos rfl, one_smul, basis.equiv_fun_apply],
{ intros j' _ hj',
rw [if_neg hj', zero_smul] },
{ intro hj,
have := finset.mem_univ j,
contradiction }
end
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ f)ᵀ j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext $ λ i, f.to_matrix_apply _ _ i j
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ f i j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
linear_map.to_matrix_apply v₁ v₂ f i j
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ f)ᵀ j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
linear_map.to_matrix_transpose_apply v₁ v₂ f j
lemma matrix.to_lin_apply (M : matrix m n R) (v : M₁) :
matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ M v = ∑ j, M.mul_vec (v₁.repr v) j • v₂ j :=
show v₂.equiv_fun.symm (matrix.to_lin' M (v₁.repr v)) = _,
by rw [matrix.to_lin'_apply, v₂.equiv_fun_symm_apply]
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_self (M : matrix m n R) (i : n) :
matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ M (v₁ i) = ∑ j, M j i • v₂ j :=
begin
rw [matrix.to_lin_apply, finset.sum_congr rfl (λ j hj, _)],
rw [basis.repr_self, matrix.mul_vec, dot_product, finset.sum_eq_single i,
finsupp.single_eq_same, mul_one],
{ intros i' _ i'_ne, rw [finsupp.single_eq_of_ne i'_ne.symm, mul_zero] },
{ intros,
have := finset.mem_univ i,
contradiction },
end
/-- This will be a special case of `linear_map.to_matrix_id_eq_basis_to_matrix`. -/
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_id : linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₁ id = 1 :=
begin
ext i j,
simp [linear_map.to_matrix_apply, matrix.one_apply, finsupp.single, eq_comm]
end
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_one : linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₁ 1 = 1 :=
linear_map.to_matrix_id v₁
@[simp]
lemma matrix.to_lin_one : matrix.to_lin v₁ v₁ 1 = id :=
by rw [← linear_map.to_matrix_id v₁, matrix.to_lin_to_matrix]
theorem linear_map.to_matrix_reindex_range [decidable_eq M₁] [decidable_eq M₂]
(f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (k : m) (i : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix v₁.reindex_range v₂.reindex_range f
⟨v₂ k, mem_range_self k⟩ ⟨v₁ i, mem_range_self i⟩ =
linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ f k i :=
by simp_rw [linear_map.to_matrix_apply, basis.reindex_range_self, basis.reindex_range_repr]
variables {M₃ : Type*} [add_comm_group M₃] [module R M₃] (v₃ : basis l R M₃)
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_comp [fintype l] [decidable_eq m] (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₃ (f.comp g) =
linear_map.to_matrix v₂ v₃ f ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ g :=
by simp_rw [linear_map.to_matrix, linear_equiv.trans_apply,
linear_equiv.arrow_congr_comp _ v₂.equiv_fun, linear_map.to_matrix'_comp]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_mul (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₁ (f * g) =
linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₁ f ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₁ g :=
by { rw [show (@has_mul.mul (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) _) = linear_map.comp, from rfl,
linear_map.to_matrix_comp v₁ v₁ v₁ f g] }
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_algebra_map (x : R) :
linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₁ (algebra_map R (module.End R M₁) x) = scalar n x :=
by simp [module.algebra_map_End_eq_smul_id, linear_map.to_matrix_id]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_mul_vec_repr (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (x : M₁) :
(linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₂ f).mul_vec (v₁.repr x) = v₂.repr (f x) :=
by { ext i,
rw [← matrix.to_lin'_apply, linear_map.to_matrix, linear_equiv.trans_apply,
matrix.to_lin'_to_matrix', linear_equiv.arrow_congr_apply, v₂.equiv_fun_apply],
congr,
exact v₁.equiv_fun.symm_apply_apply x }
lemma matrix.to_lin_mul [fintype l] [decidable_eq m] (A : matrix l m R) (B : matrix m n R) :
matrix.to_lin v₁ v₃ (A ⬝ B) =
(matrix.to_lin v₂ v₃ A).comp (matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ B) :=
begin
apply (linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₃).injective,
haveI : decidable_eq l := λ _ _, classical.prop_decidable _,
rw linear_map.to_matrix_comp v₁ v₂ v₃,
repeat { rw linear_map.to_matrix_to_lin },
end
/-- Shortcut lemma for `matrix.to_lin_mul` and `linear_map.comp_apply`. -/
lemma matrix.to_lin_mul_apply [fintype l] [decidable_eq m]
(A : matrix l m R) (B : matrix m n R) (x) :
matrix.to_lin v₁ v₃ (A ⬝ B) x =
(matrix.to_lin v₂ v₃ A) (matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ B x) :=
by rw [matrix.to_lin_mul v₁ v₂, linear_map.comp_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M` are each other's inverse matrices, `matrix.to_lin M` and `matrix.to_lin M'`
form a linear equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def matrix.to_lin_of_inv [decidable_eq m]
{M : matrix m n R} {M' : matrix n m R}
(hMM' : M ⬝ M' = 1) (hM'M : M' ⬝ M = 1) :
M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ M,
inv_fun := matrix.to_lin v₂ v₁ M',
left_inv := λ x, by rw [← matrix.to_lin_mul_apply, hM'M, matrix.to_lin_one, id_apply],
right_inv := λ x, by rw [← matrix.to_lin_mul_apply, hMM', matrix.to_lin_one, id_apply],
.. matrix.to_lin v₁ v₂ M }
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁` and square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis. -/
def linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv :
(M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
alg_equiv.of_linear_equiv (linear_map.to_matrix v₁ v₁) (linear_map.to_matrix_mul v₁)
(linear_map.to_matrix_algebra_map v₁)
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁`. -/
def matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv : matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :=
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁).symm
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_symm :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁).symm = matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_symm :
(matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁).symm = linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_to_matrix_alg_equiv (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ (linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ f) = f :=
by rw [← matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_symm, alg_equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp] lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_to_lin_alg_equiv (M : matrix n n R) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ M) = M :=
by rw [← matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_symm, alg_equiv.symm_apply_apply]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (i j : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ f i j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
by simp [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv, linear_map.to_matrix_apply]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (j : n) :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ f)ᵀ j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext $ λ i, f.to_matrix_apply _ _ i j
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (i j : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ f i j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_apply v₁ f i j
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (j : n) :
(linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ f)ᵀ j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_transpose_apply v₁ f j
lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_apply (M : matrix n n R) (v : M₁) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ M v = ∑ j, M.mul_vec (v₁.repr v) j • v₁ j :=
show v₁.equiv_fun.symm (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv' M (v₁.repr v)) = _,
by rw [matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv'_apply, v₁.equiv_fun_symm_apply]
@[simp] lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_self (M : matrix n n R) (i : n) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ M (v₁ i) = ∑ j, M j i • v₁ j :=
matrix.to_lin_self _ _ _ _
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_id : linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ id = 1 :=
by simp_rw [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv, alg_equiv.of_linear_equiv_apply,
linear_map.to_matrix_id]
@[simp]
lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_one : matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ 1 = id :=
by rw [← linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_id v₁, matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_to_matrix_alg_equiv]
theorem linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_reindex_range [decidable_eq M₁]
(f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (k i : n) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁.reindex_range f
⟨v₁ k, mem_range_self k⟩ ⟨v₁ i, mem_range_self i⟩ =
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ f k i :=
by simp_rw [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_apply,
basis.reindex_range_self, basis.reindex_range_repr]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_comp (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ (f.comp g) =
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ f ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ g :=
by simp [linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv, linear_map.to_matrix_comp v₁ v₁ v₁ f g]
lemma linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_mul (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ (f * g) =
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ f ⬝ linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv v₁ g :=
by { rw [show (@has_mul.mul (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) _) = linear_map.comp, from rfl,
linear_map.to_matrix_alg_equiv_comp v₁ f g] }
lemma matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv_mul (A B : matrix n n R) :
matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ (A ⬝ B) =
(matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ A).comp (matrix.to_lin_alg_equiv v₁ B) :=
by convert matrix.to_lin_mul v₁ v₁ v₁ A B
end to_matrix
namespace algebra
section lmul
variables {R S T : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] [comm_ring T]
variables [algebra R S] [algebra S T] [algebra R T] [is_scalar_tower R S T]
variables {m n : Type*} [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq n]
variables (b : basis m R S) (c : basis n S T)
open algebra
lemma to_matrix_lmul' (x : S) (i j) :
linear_map.to_matrix b b (lmul R S x) i j = b.repr (x * b j) i :=
by rw [linear_map.to_matrix_apply', lmul_apply]
@[simp] lemma to_matrix_lsmul (x : R) (i j) :
linear_map.to_matrix b b (algebra.lsmul R S x) i j = if i = j then x else 0 :=
by { rw [linear_map.to_matrix_apply', algebra.lsmul_coe, linear_equiv.map_smul, finsupp.smul_apply,
b.repr_self_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_boole],
congr' 1; simp only [eq_comm] }
/-- `left_mul_matrix b x` is the matrix corresponding to the linear map `λ y, x * y`.
`left_mul_matrix_eq_repr_mul` gives a formula for the entries of `left_mul_matrix`.
This definition is useful for doing (more) explicit computations with `algebra.lmul`,
such as the trace form or norm map for algebras.
-/
noncomputable def left_mul_matrix : S →ₐ[R] matrix m m R :=
{ to_fun := λ x, linear_map.to_matrix b b (algebra.lmul R S x),
map_zero' := by rw [alg_hom.map_zero, linear_equiv.map_zero],
map_one' := by rw [alg_hom.map_one, linear_map.to_matrix_one],
map_add' := λ x y, by rw [alg_hom.map_add, linear_equiv.map_add],
map_mul' := λ x y, by rw [alg_hom.map_mul, linear_map.to_matrix_mul, matrix.mul_eq_mul],
commutes' := λ r, by { ext, rw [lmul_algebra_map, to_matrix_lsmul,
algebra_map_matrix_apply, id.map_eq_self] } }
lemma left_mul_matrix_apply (x : S) :
left_mul_matrix b x = linear_map.to_matrix b b (lmul R S x) := rfl
lemma left_mul_matrix_eq_repr_mul (x : S) (i j) :
left_mul_matrix b x i j = b.repr (x * b j) i :=
-- This is defeq to just `to_matrix_lmul' b x i j`,
-- but the unfolding goes a lot faster with this explicit `rw`.
by rw [left_mul_matrix_apply, to_matrix_lmul' b x i j]
lemma left_mul_matrix_mul_vec_repr (x y : S) :
(left_mul_matrix b x).mul_vec (b.repr y) = b.repr (x * y) :=
linear_map.to_matrix_mul_vec_repr b b (algebra.lmul R S x) y
@[simp] lemma to_matrix_lmul_eq (x : S) :
linear_map.to_matrix b b (lmul R S x) = left_mul_matrix b x :=
rfl
lemma left_mul_matrix_injective : function.injective (left_mul_matrix b) :=
λ x x' h, calc x = algebra.lmul R S x 1 : (mul_one x).symm
... = algebra.lmul R S x' 1 : by rw (linear_map.to_matrix b b).injective h
... = x' : mul_one x'
variable [fintype n]
lemma smul_left_mul_matrix (x) (ik jk) :
left_mul_matrix (b.smul c) x ik jk =
left_mul_matrix b (left_mul_matrix c x ik.2 jk.2) ik.1 jk.1 :=
by simp only [left_mul_matrix_apply, linear_map.to_matrix_apply, mul_comm, basis.smul_apply,
basis.smul_repr, finsupp.smul_apply, algebra.lmul_apply, id.smul_eq_mul,
linear_equiv.map_smul, mul_smul_comm]
lemma smul_left_mul_matrix_algebra_map (x : S) :
left_mul_matrix (b.smul c) (algebra_map _ _ x) = block_diagonal (λ k, left_mul_matrix b x) :=
begin
ext ⟨i, k⟩ ⟨j, k'⟩,
rw [smul_left_mul_matrix, alg_hom.commutes, block_diagonal_apply, algebra_map_matrix_apply],
split_ifs with h; simp [h],
end
lemma smul_left_mul_matrix_algebra_map_eq (x : S) (i j k) :
left_mul_matrix (b.smul c) (algebra_map _ _ x) (i, k) (j, k) = left_mul_matrix b x i j :=
by rw [smul_left_mul_matrix_algebra_map, block_diagonal_apply_eq]
lemma smul_left_mul_matrix_algebra_map_ne (x : S) (i j) {k k'}
(h : k ≠ k') : left_mul_matrix (b.smul c) (algebra_map _ _ x) (i, k) (j, k') = 0 :=
by rw [smul_left_mul_matrix_algebra_map, block_diagonal_apply_ne _ _ _ h]
end lmul
end algebra
namespace linear_map
section finite_dimensional
open_locale classical
variables {K : Type*} [field K]
variables {V : Type*} [add_comm_group V] [module K V] [finite_dimensional K V]
variables {W : Type*} [add_comm_group W] [module K W] [finite_dimensional K W]
instance : finite_dimensional K (V →ₗ[K] W) :=
linear_equiv.finite_dimensional
(linear_map.to_matrix (basis.of_vector_space K V) (basis.of_vector_space K W)).symm
/--
The dimension of the space of linear transformations is the product of the dimensions of the
domain and codomain.
-/
@[simp] lemma finrank_linear_map :
finite_dimensional.finrank K (V →ₗ[K] W) =
(finite_dimensional.finrank K V) * (finite_dimensional.finrank K W) :=
begin
let hbV := basis.of_vector_space K V,
let hbW := basis.of_vector_space K W,
rw [linear_equiv.finrank_eq (linear_map.to_matrix hbV hbW), matrix.finrank_matrix,
finite_dimensional.finrank_eq_card_basis hbV, finite_dimensional.finrank_eq_card_basis hbW,
mul_comm],
end
end finite_dimensional
end linear_map
section
variables {R : Type v} [comm_ring R] {n : Type*} [decidable_eq n]
variables {M M₁ M₂ : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables [add_comm_group M₁] [module R M₁] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂]
/-- The natural equivalence between linear endomorphisms of finite free modules and square matrices
is compatible with the algebra structures. -/
def alg_equiv_matrix' [fintype n] : module.End R (n → R) ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
{ map_mul' := linear_map.to_matrix'_comp,
map_add' := linear_map.to_matrix'.map_add,
commutes' := λ r, by { change (r • (linear_map.id : module.End R _)).to_matrix' = r • 1,
rw ←linear_map.to_matrix'_id, refl, apply_instance },
..linear_map.to_matrix' }
/-- A linear equivalence of two modules induces an equivalence of algebras of their
endomorphisms. -/
def linear_equiv.alg_conj (e : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) :
module.End R M₁ ≃ₐ[R] module.End R M₂ :=
{ map_mul' := λ f g, by apply e.arrow_congr_comp,
map_add' := e.conj.map_add,
commutes' := λ r, by { change e.conj (r • linear_map.id) = r • linear_map.id,
rw [linear_equiv.map_smul, linear_equiv.conj_id], },
..e.conj }
/-- A basis of a module induces an equivalence of algebras from the endomorphisms of the module to
square matrices. -/
def alg_equiv_matrix [fintype n] (h : basis n R M) : module.End R M ≃ₐ[R] matrix n n R :=
h.equiv_fun.alg_conj.trans alg_equiv_matrix'
end
|
32b1f8be7aa331ba99e132a1158de8e0baac5ac8 | d3aa99b88d7159fbbb8ab10d699374ab7be89e03 | /src/measure_theory/measure_space.lean | bea609b148f8df549c702974ad78f686f81f3bd6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mzinkevi/mathlib | 62e0920edaf743f7fc53aaf42a08e372954af298 | c718a22925872db4cb5f64c36ed6e6a07bdf647c | refs/heads/master | 1,599,359,590,404 | 1,573,098,221,000 | 1,573,098,221,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,069 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Measure spaces -- measures
Measures are restricted to a measurable space (associated by the type class `measurable_space`).
This allows us to prove equalities between measures by restricting to a generating set of the
measurable space.
On the other hand, the `μ.measure s` projection (i.e. the measure of `s` on the measure space `μ`)
is the _outer_ measure generated by `μ`. This gives us a unrestricted monotonicity rule and it is
somehow well-behaved on non-measurable sets.
This allows us for the `lebesgue` measure space to have the `borel` measurable space, but still be
a complete measure.
-/
import data.set.lattice data.set.finite
import topology.instances.ennreal
measure_theory.outer_measure
noncomputable theory
open classical set lattice filter finset function
open_locale classical
universes u v w x
namespace measure_theory
section of_measurable
parameters {α : Type*} [measurable_space α]
parameters (m : Π (s : set α), is_measurable s → ennreal)
parameters (m0 : m ∅ is_measurable.empty = 0)
include m0
/-- Measure projection which is ∞ for non-measurable sets.
`measure'` is mainly used to derive the outer measure, for the main `measure` projection. -/
def measure' (s : set α) : ennreal := ⨅ h : is_measurable s, m s h
lemma measure'_eq {s} (h : is_measurable s) : measure' s = m s h :=
by simp [measure', h]
lemma measure'_empty : measure' ∅ = 0 :=
(measure'_eq is_measurable.empty).trans m0
lemma measure'_Union_nat
{f : ℕ → set α}
(hm : ∀i, is_measurable (f i))
(mU : m (⋃i, f i) (is_measurable.Union hm) = (∑i, m (f i) (hm i))) :
measure' (⋃i, f i) = (∑i, measure' (f i)) :=
(measure'_eq _).trans $ mU.trans $
by congr; funext i; rw measure'_eq
/-- outer measure of a measure -/
def outer_measure' : outer_measure α :=
outer_measure.of_function measure' measure'_empty
lemma measure'_Union_le_tsum_nat'
(mU : ∀ {f : ℕ → set α} (hm : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)),
m (⋃i, f i) (is_measurable.Union hm) ≤ (∑i, m (f i) (hm i)))
(s : ℕ → set α) :
measure' (⋃i, s i) ≤ (∑i, measure' (s i)) :=
begin
by_cases h : ∀i, is_measurable (s i),
{ rw [measure'_eq _ _ (is_measurable.Union h),
congr_arg tsum _], {apply mU h},
funext i, apply measure'_eq _ _ (h i) },
{ cases not_forall.1 h with i hi,
exact le_trans (le_infi $ λ h, hi.elim h) (ennreal.le_tsum i) }
end
parameter (mU : ∀ {f : ℕ → set α} (hm : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)),
pairwise (disjoint on f) →
m (⋃i, f i) (is_measurable.Union hm) = (∑i, m (f i) (hm i)))
include mU
lemma measure'_Union
{β} [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hd : pairwise (disjoint on f)) (hm : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)) :
measure' (⋃i, f i) = (∑i, measure' (f i)) :=
begin
rw [encodable.Union_decode2, outer_measure.Union_aux],
{ exact measure'_Union_nat _ _
(λ n, encodable.Union_decode2_cases is_measurable.empty hm)
(mU _ (measurable_space.Union_decode2_disjoint_on hd)) },
{ apply measure'_empty },
end
lemma measure'_union {s₁ s₂ : set α}
(hd : disjoint s₁ s₂) (h₁ : is_measurable s₁) (h₂ : is_measurable s₂) :
measure' (s₁ ∪ s₂) = measure' s₁ + measure' s₂ :=
begin
rw [union_eq_Union, measure'_Union _ _ @mU
(pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 hd) (bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩),
tsum_fintype],
change _+_ = _, simp
end
lemma measure'_mono {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h₁ : is_measurable s₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
measure' s₁ ≤ measure' s₂ :=
le_infi $ λ h₂, begin
have := measure'_union _ _ @mU disjoint_diff h₁ (h₂.diff h₁),
rw union_diff_cancel hs at this,
rw ← measure'_eq m m0 _,
exact le_iff_exists_add.2 ⟨_, this⟩
end
lemma measure'_Union_le_tsum_nat : ∀ (s : ℕ → set α),
measure' (⋃i, s i) ≤ (∑i, measure' (s i)) :=
measure'_Union_le_tsum_nat' $ λ f h, begin
simp [Union_disjointed.symm] {single_pass := tt},
rw [mU (is_measurable.disjointed h) disjoint_disjointed],
refine ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ i, _),
rw [← measure'_eq m m0, ← measure'_eq m m0],
exact measure'_mono _ _ @mU (is_measurable.disjointed h _) (inter_subset_left _ _)
end
lemma outer_measure'_eq {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
outer_measure' s = m s hs :=
by rw ← measure'_eq m m0 hs; exact
(le_antisymm (outer_measure.of_function_le _ _ _) $
le_infi $ λ f, le_infi $ λ hf,
le_trans (measure'_mono _ _ @mU hs hf) $
measure'_Union_le_tsum_nat _ _ @mU _)
lemma outer_measure'_eq_measure' {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
outer_measure' s = measure' s :=
by rw [measure'_eq m m0 hs, outer_measure'_eq m m0 @mU hs]
end of_measurable
namespace outer_measure
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] (m : outer_measure α)
def trim : outer_measure α :=
outer_measure' (λ s _, m s) m.empty
theorem trim_ge : m ≤ m.trim :=
λ s, le_infi $ λ f, le_infi $ λ hs,
le_trans (m.mono hs) $ le_trans (m.Union_nat f) $
ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ i, le_infi $ λ hf, le_refl _
theorem trim_eq {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) : m.trim s = m s :=
le_antisymm (le_trans (of_function_le _ _ _) (infi_le _ hs)) (trim_ge _ _)
theorem trim_congr {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α}
(H : ∀ {s : set α}, is_measurable s → m₁ s = m₂ s) :
m₁.trim = m₂.trim :=
by unfold trim; congr; funext s hs; exact H hs
theorem trim_le_trim {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α} (H : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.trim ≤ m₂.trim :=
λ s, infi_le_infi $ λ f, infi_le_infi $ λ hs,
ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ b, infi_le_infi $ λ hf, H _
theorem le_trim_iff {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α} : m₁ ≤ m₂.trim ↔
∀ s, is_measurable s → m₁ s ≤ m₂ s :=
le_of_function.trans $ forall_congr $ λ s, le_infi_iff
theorem trim_eq_infi (s : set α) : m.trim s = ⨅ t (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : is_measurable t), m t :=
begin
refine le_antisymm
(le_infi $ λ t, le_infi $ λ st, le_infi $ λ ht, _)
(le_infi $ λ f, le_infi $ λ hf, _),
{ rw ← trim_eq m ht, exact (trim m).mono st },
{ by_cases h : ∀i, is_measurable (f i),
{ refine infi_le_of_le _ (infi_le_of_le hf $
infi_le_of_le (is_measurable.Union h) _),
rw congr_arg tsum _, {exact m.Union_nat _},
funext i, exact measure'_eq _ _ (h i) },
{ cases not_forall.1 h with i hi,
exact le_trans (le_infi $ λ h, hi.elim h) (ennreal.le_tsum i) } }
end
theorem trim_eq_infi' (s : set α) : m.trim s = ⨅ t : {t // s ⊆ t ∧ is_measurable t}, m t.1 :=
by simp [infi_subtype, infi_and, trim_eq_infi]
theorem trim_trim (m : outer_measure α) : m.trim.trim = m.trim :=
le_antisymm (le_trim_iff.2 $ λ s hs, by simp [trim_eq _ hs, le_refl]) (trim_ge _)
theorem trim_zero : (0 : outer_measure α).trim = 0 :=
ext $ λ s, le_antisymm
(le_trans ((trim 0).mono (subset_univ s)) $
le_of_eq $ trim_eq _ is_measurable.univ)
(zero_le _)
theorem trim_add (m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α) : (m₁ + m₂).trim = m₁.trim + m₂.trim :=
ext $ λ s, begin
simp [trim_eq_infi'],
rw ennreal.infi_add_infi,
rintro ⟨t₁, st₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, st₂, ht₂⟩,
exact ⟨⟨_, subset_inter_iff.2 ⟨st₁, st₂⟩, ht₁.inter ht₂⟩,
add_le_add'
(m₁.mono' (inter_subset_left _ _))
(m₂.mono' (inter_subset_right _ _))⟩,
end
theorem trim_sum_ge {ι} (m : ι → outer_measure α) : sum (λ i, (m i).trim) ≤ (sum m).trim :=
λ s, by simp [trim_eq_infi]; exact
λ t st ht, ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ i,
infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le_of_le st $ infi_le _ ht)
end outer_measure
structure measure (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] extends outer_measure α :=
(m_Union {f : ℕ → set α} :
(∀i, is_measurable (f i)) → pairwise (disjoint on f) →
measure_of (⋃i, f i) = (∑i, measure_of (f i)))
(trimmed : to_outer_measure.trim = to_outer_measure)
/-- Measure projections for a measure space.
For measurable sets this returns the measure assigned by the `measure_of` field in `measure`.
But we can extend this to _all_ sets, but using the outer measure. This gives us monotonicity and
subadditivity for all sets.
-/
instance measure.has_coe_to_fun {α} [measurable_space α] : has_coe_to_fun (measure α) :=
⟨λ _, set α → ennreal, λ m, m.to_outer_measure⟩
namespace measure
def of_measurable {α} [measurable_space α]
(m : Π (s : set α), is_measurable s → ennreal)
(m0 : m ∅ is_measurable.empty = 0)
(mU : ∀ {f : ℕ → set α} (h : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)),
pairwise (disjoint on f) →
m (⋃i, f i) (is_measurable.Union h) = (∑i, m (f i) (h i))) :
measure α :=
{ m_Union := λ f hf hd,
show outer_measure' m m0 (Union f) =
∑ i, outer_measure' m m0 (f i), begin
rw [outer_measure'_eq m m0 @mU, mU hf hd],
congr, funext n, rw outer_measure'_eq m m0 @mU
end,
trimmed :=
show (outer_measure' m m0).trim = outer_measure' m m0, begin
unfold outer_measure.trim,
congr, funext s hs,
exact outer_measure'_eq m m0 @mU hs
end,
..outer_measure' m m0 }
lemma of_measurable_apply {α} [measurable_space α]
{m : Π (s : set α), is_measurable s → ennreal}
{m0 : m ∅ is_measurable.empty = 0}
{mU : ∀ {f : ℕ → set α} (h : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)),
pairwise (disjoint on f) →
m (⋃i, f i) (is_measurable.Union h) = (∑i, m (f i) (h i))}
(s : set α) (hs : is_measurable s) :
of_measurable m m0 @mU s = m s hs :=
outer_measure'_eq m m0 @mU hs
@[ext] lemma ext {α} [measurable_space α] :
∀ {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α}, (∀s, is_measurable s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) → μ₁ = μ₂
| ⟨m₁, u₁, h₁⟩ ⟨m₂, u₂, h₂⟩ h := by congr; rw [← h₁, ← h₂];
exact outer_measure.trim_congr h
end measure
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [measurable_space α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} {s s₁ s₂ : set α}
@[simp] lemma to_outer_measure_apply (s) : μ.to_outer_measure s = μ s := rfl
lemma measure_eq_trim (s) : μ s = μ.to_outer_measure.trim s :=
by rw μ.trimmed; refl
lemma measure_eq_infi (s) : μ s = ⨅ t (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : is_measurable t), μ t :=
by rw [measure_eq_trim, outer_measure.trim_eq_infi]; refl
lemma measure_eq_outer_measure' :
μ s = outer_measure' (λ s _, μ s) μ.empty s :=
measure_eq_trim _
lemma to_outer_measure_eq_outer_measure' :
μ.to_outer_measure = outer_measure' (λ s _, μ s) μ.empty :=
μ.trimmed.symm
lemma measure_eq_measure' (hs : is_measurable s) :
μ s = measure' (λ s _, μ s) μ.empty s :=
by rw [measure_eq_outer_measure',
outer_measure'_eq_measure' (λ s _, μ s) _ μ.m_Union hs]
@[simp] lemma measure_empty : μ ∅ = 0 := μ.empty
lemma measure_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := μ.mono h
lemma measure_mono_null (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : μ s₂ = 0) : μ s₁ = 0 :=
by rw [← le_zero_iff_eq, ← h₂]; exact measure_mono h
lemma exists_is_measurable_superset_of_measure_eq_zero {s : set α} (h : μ s = 0) :
∃t, s ⊆ t ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ t = 0 :=
begin
rw [measure_eq_infi] at h,
have h := (infi_eq_bot _).1 h,
choose t ht using show ∀n:ℕ, ∃t, s ⊆ t ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ t < n⁻¹,
{ assume n,
have : (0 : ennreal) < n⁻¹ :=
(zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 $ ennreal.inv_ne_zero.2 $ ennreal.nat_ne_top _),
rcases h _ this with ⟨t, ht⟩,
use [t],
simpa [(>), infi_lt_iff, -add_comm] using ht },
refine ⟨⋂n, t n, subset_Inter (λn, (ht n).1), is_measurable.Inter (λn, (ht n).2.1), _⟩,
refine eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense bot_le (assume r hr, _),
rcases ennreal.exists_inv_nat_lt (ne_of_gt hr) with ⟨n, hn⟩,
calc μ (⋂n, t n) ≤ μ (t n) : measure_mono (Inter_subset _ _)
... ≤ n⁻¹ : le_of_lt (ht n).2.2
... ≤ r : le_of_lt hn
end
theorem measure_Union_le {β} [encodable β] (s : β → set α) : μ (⋃i, s i) ≤ (∑i, μ (s i)) :=
μ.to_outer_measure.Union _
lemma measure_Union_null {β} [encodable β] {s : β → set α} :
(∀ i, μ (s i) = 0) → μ (⋃i, s i) = 0 :=
μ.to_outer_measure.Union_null
theorem measure_union_le (s₁ s₂ : set α) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ≤ μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
μ.to_outer_measure.union _ _
lemma measure_union_null {s₁ s₂ : set α} : μ s₁ = 0 → μ s₂ = 0 → μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = 0 :=
μ.to_outer_measure.union_null
lemma measure_Union {β} [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hn : pairwise (disjoint on f)) (h : ∀i, is_measurable (f i)) :
μ (⋃i, f i) = (∑i, μ (f i)) :=
by rw [measure_eq_measure' (is_measurable.Union h),
measure'_Union (λ s _, μ s) _ μ.m_Union hn h];
simp [measure_eq_measure', h]
lemma measure_union (hd : disjoint s₁ s₂) (h₁ : is_measurable s₁) (h₂ : is_measurable s₂) :
μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
by rw [measure_eq_measure' (h₁.union h₂),
measure'_union (λ s _, μ s) _ μ.m_Union hd h₁ h₂];
simp [measure_eq_measure', h₁, h₂]
lemma measure_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : countable s)
(hd : pairwise_on s (disjoint on f)) (h : ∀b∈s, is_measurable (f b)) :
μ (⋃b∈s, f b) = ∑p:s, μ (f p.1) :=
begin
haveI := hs.to_encodable,
rw [← measure_Union, bUnion_eq_Union],
{ rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ ij x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
exact hd i hi j hj (mt subtype.eq' ij:_) ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ simpa }
end
lemma measure_sUnion {S : set (set α)} (hs : countable S)
(hd : pairwise_on S disjoint) (h : ∀s∈S, is_measurable s) :
μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑s:S, μ s.1 :=
by rw [sUnion_eq_bUnion, measure_bUnion hs hd h]
lemma measure_diff {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁)
(h₁ : is_measurable s₁) (h₂ : is_measurable s₂)
(h_fin : μ s₂ < ⊤) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ :=
begin
refine (ennreal.add_sub_self' h_fin).symm.trans _,
rw [← measure_union disjoint_diff h₂ (h₁.diff h₂), union_diff_cancel h]
end
lemma measure_Union_eq_supr_nat {s : ℕ → set α} (h : ∀i, is_measurable (s i)) (hs : monotone s) :
μ (⋃i, s i) = (⨆i, μ (s i)) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (supr_le $ λ i, measure_mono $ subset_Union _ _),
rw [← Union_disjointed,
measure_Union disjoint_disjointed (is_measurable.disjointed h),
ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat],
refine supr_le (λ n, _),
cases n, {apply zero_le _},
suffices : sum (finset.range n.succ) (λ i, μ (disjointed s i)) = μ (s n),
{ rw this, exact le_supr _ n },
rw [← Union_disjointed_of_mono hs, measure_Union, tsum_eq_sum],
{ apply sum_congr rfl, intros i hi,
simp [finset.mem_range.1 hi] },
{ intros i hi, simp [mt finset.mem_range.2 hi] },
{ rintro i j ij x ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, h₁⟩, ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, h₂⟩⟩,
exact disjoint_disjointed i j ij ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ intro i,
by_cases h' : i < n.succ; simp [h', is_measurable.empty],
apply is_measurable.disjointed h }
end
lemma measure_Inter_eq_infi_nat {s : ℕ → set α}
(h : ∀i, is_measurable (s i)) (hs : ∀i j, i ≤ j → s j ⊆ s i)
(hfin : ∃i, μ (s i) < ⊤) :
μ (⋂i, s i) = (⨅i, μ (s i)) :=
begin
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩,
rw [← ennreal.sub_sub_cancel (by exact hk) (infi_le _ k),
ennreal.sub_infi,
← ennreal.sub_sub_cancel (by exact hk) (measure_mono (Inter_subset _ k)),
← measure_diff (Inter_subset _ k) (h k) (is_measurable.Inter h)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (Inter_subset _ k)) hk),
diff_Inter, measure_Union_eq_supr_nat],
{ congr, funext i,
cases le_total k i with ik ik,
{ exact measure_diff (hs _ _ ik) (h k) (h i)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (hs _ _ ik)) hk) },
{ rw [diff_eq_empty.2 (hs _ _ ik), measure_empty,
ennreal.sub_eq_zero_of_le (measure_mono (hs _ _ ik))] } },
{ exact λ i, (h k).diff (h i) },
{ exact λ i j ij, diff_subset_diff_right (hs _ _ ij) }
end
lemma measure_eq_inter_diff {μ : measure α} {s t : set α}
(hs : is_measurable s) (ht : is_measurable t) :
μ s = μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) :=
have hd : disjoint (s ∩ t) (s \ t) := assume a ⟨⟨_, hs⟩, _, hns⟩, hns hs ,
by rw [← measure_union hd (hs.inter ht) (hs.diff ht), inter_union_diff s t]
lemma tendsto_measure_Union {μ : measure α} {s : ℕ → set α}
(hs : ∀n, is_measurable (s n)) (hm : monotone s) :
tendsto (μ ∘ s) at_top (nhds (μ (⋃n, s n))) :=
begin
rw measure_Union_eq_supr_nat hs hm,
exact tendsto_at_top_supr_nat (μ ∘ s) (assume n m hnm, measure_mono $ hm $ hnm)
end
lemma tendsto_measure_Inter {μ : measure α} {s : ℕ → set α}
(hs : ∀n, is_measurable (s n)) (hm : ∀n m, n ≤ m → s m ⊆ s n) (hf : ∃i, μ (s i) < ⊤) :
tendsto (μ ∘ s) at_top (nhds (μ (⋂n, s n))) :=
begin
rw measure_Inter_eq_infi_nat hs hm hf,
exact tendsto_at_top_infi_nat (μ ∘ s) (assume n m hnm, measure_mono $ hm _ _ $ hnm),
end
end
def outer_measure.to_measure {α} (m : outer_measure α)
[ms : measurable_space α] (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
measure α :=
measure.of_measurable (λ s _, m s) m.empty
(λ f hf hd, m.Union_eq_of_caratheodory (λ i, h _ (hf i)) hd)
lemma le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory {α} [ms : measurable_space α]
(μ : measure α) : ms ≤ μ.to_outer_measure.caratheodory :=
begin
assume s hs,
rw to_outer_measure_eq_outer_measure',
refine outer_measure.caratheodory_is_measurable (λ t, le_infi $ λ ht, _),
rw [← measure_eq_measure' (ht.inter hs),
← measure_eq_measure' (ht.diff hs),
← measure_union _ (ht.inter hs) (ht.diff hs),
inter_union_diff],
exact le_refl _,
exact λ x ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, _, h₂⟩, h₂ h₁
end
lemma to_measure_to_outer_measure {α} (m : outer_measure α)
[ms : measurable_space α] (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.to_measure h).to_outer_measure = m.trim := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_measure_apply {α} (m : outer_measure α)
[ms : measurable_space α] (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory)
{s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
m.to_measure h s = m s := m.trim_eq hs
lemma to_outer_measure_to_measure {α : Type*} [ms : measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} :
μ.to_outer_measure.to_measure (le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
measure.ext $ λ s, μ.to_outer_measure.trim_eq
namespace measure
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
[measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
instance : has_zero (measure α) :=
⟨{ to_outer_measure := 0,
m_Union := λ f hf hd, tsum_zero.symm,
trimmed := outer_measure.trim_zero }⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_to_outer_measure :
(0 : measure α).to_outer_measure = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_apply (s : set α) : (0 : measure α) s = 0 := rfl
instance : inhabited (measure α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_add (measure α) :=
⟨λμ₁ μ₂, {
to_outer_measure := μ₁.to_outer_measure + μ₂.to_outer_measure,
m_Union := λs hs hd,
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑ i, μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i),
by rw [ennreal.tsum_add, measure_Union hd hs, measure_Union hd hs],
trimmed := by rw [outer_measure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp] theorem add_to_outer_measure (μ₁ μ₂ : measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).to_outer_measure = μ₁.to_outer_measure + μ₂.to_outer_measure := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_apply (μ₁ μ₂ : measure α) (s : set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s := rfl
instance : add_comm_monoid (measure α) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
add_assoc := assume a b c, ext $ assume s hs, add_assoc _ _ _,
add_comm := assume a b, ext $ assume s hs, add_comm _ _,
zero_add := assume a, ext $ assume s hs, zero_add _,
add_zero := assume a, ext $ assume s hs, add_zero _ }
instance : partial_order (measure α) :=
{ le := λm₁ m₂, ∀ s, is_measurable s → m₁ s ≤ m₂ s,
le_refl := assume m s hs, le_refl _,
le_trans := assume m₁ m₂ m₃ h₁ h₂ s hs, le_trans (h₁ s hs) (h₂ s hs),
le_antisymm := assume m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂, ext $
assume s hs, le_antisymm (h₁ s hs) (h₂ s hs) }
theorem le_iff {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} :
μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, is_measurable s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := iff.rfl
theorem to_outer_measure_le {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} :
μ₁.to_outer_measure ≤ μ₂.to_outer_measure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
by rw [← μ₂.trimmed, outer_measure.le_trim_iff]; refl
theorem le_iff' {μ₁ μ₂ : measure α} :
μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s :=
to_outer_measure_le.symm
section
variables {m : set (measure α)} {μ : measure α}
lemma Inf_caratheodory (s : set α) (hs : is_measurable s) :
(Inf (measure.to_outer_measure '' m)).caratheodory.is_measurable s :=
begin
rw [outer_measure.Inf_eq_of_function_Inf_gen],
refine outer_measure.caratheodory_is_measurable (assume t, _),
by_cases ht : t = ∅, { simp [ht] },
simp only [outer_measure.Inf_gen_nonempty1 _ _ ht, le_infi_iff, ball_image_iff,
to_outer_measure_apply, measure_eq_infi t],
assume μ hμ u htu hu,
have hm : ∀{s t}, s ⊆ t → outer_measure.Inf_gen (to_outer_measure '' m) s ≤ μ t,
{ assume s t hst,
rw [outer_measure.Inf_gen_nonempty2 _ _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hμ)],
refine infi_le_of_le (μ.to_outer_measure) (infi_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hμ) _),
rw [to_outer_measure_apply],
refine measure_mono hst },
rw [measure_eq_inter_diff hu hs],
refine add_le_add' (hm $ inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm $ diff_subset_diff_left htu)
end
instance : has_Inf (measure α) :=
⟨λm, (Inf (to_outer_measure '' m)).to_measure $ Inf_caratheodory⟩
lemma Inf_apply {m : set (measure α)} {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
Inf m s = Inf (to_outer_measure '' m) s :=
to_measure_apply _ _ hs
private lemma Inf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : Inf m ≤ μ :=
have Inf (to_outer_measure '' m) ≤ μ.to_outer_measure := Inf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h),
assume s hs, by rw [Inf_apply hs, ← to_outer_measure_apply]; exact this s
private lemma le_Inf (h : ∀μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ Inf m :=
have μ.to_outer_measure ≤ Inf (to_outer_measure '' m) :=
le_Inf $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume μ hμ, to_outer_measure_le.2 $ h _ hμ,
assume s hs, by rw [Inf_apply hs, ← to_outer_measure_apply]; exact this s
instance : has_Sup (measure α) := ⟨λs, Inf {μ' | ∀μ∈s, μ ≤ μ' }⟩
private lemma le_Sup (h : μ ∈ m) : μ ≤ Sup m := le_Inf $ assume μ' h', h' _ h
private lemma Sup_le (h : ∀μ' ∈ m, μ' ≤ μ) : Sup m ≤ μ := Inf_le h
instance : order_bot (measure α) :=
{ bot := 0, bot_le := assume a s hs, bot_le, .. measure.partial_order }
instance : order_top (measure α) :=
{ top := (⊤ : outer_measure α).to_measure (by rw [outer_measure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top),
le_top := assume a s hs,
by by_cases s = ∅; simp [h, to_measure_apply ⊤ _ hs, outer_measure.top_apply],
.. measure.partial_order }
instance : complete_lattice (measure α) :=
{ Inf := Inf,
Sup := Sup,
inf := λa b, Inf {a, b},
sup := λa b, Sup {a, b},
le_Sup := assume s μ h, le_Sup h,
Sup_le := assume s μ h, Sup_le h,
Inf_le := assume s μ h, Inf_le h,
le_Inf := assume s μ h, le_Inf h,
le_sup_left := assume a b, le_Sup $ by simp,
le_sup_right := assume a b, le_Sup $ by simp,
sup_le := assume a b c hac hbc, Sup_le $ by simp [*, or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt},
inf_le_left := assume a b, Inf_le $ by simp,
inf_le_right := assume a b, Inf_le $ by simp,
le_inf := assume a b c hac hbc, le_Inf $ by simp [*, or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt},
.. measure.partial_order, .. measure.lattice.order_top, .. measure.lattice.order_bot }
end
def map (f : α → β) (μ : measure α) : measure β :=
if hf : measurable f then
(μ.to_outer_measure.map f).to_measure $ λ s hs t,
le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory μ _ (hf _ hs) (f ⁻¹' t)
else 0
variables {μ ν : measure α}
@[simp] theorem map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f)
{s : set β} (hs : is_measurable s) :
(map f μ : measure β) s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) :=
by rw [map, dif_pos hf, to_measure_apply _ _ hs]; refl
@[simp] lemma map_id : map id μ = μ :=
ext $ λ s, map_apply measurable_id
lemma map_map {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : measurable g) (hf : measurable f) :
map g (map f μ) = map (g ∘ f) μ :=
ext $ λ s hs,
by simp [hf, hg, hs, hg.preimage hs, hg.comp hf];
rw ← preimage_comp
/-- The dirac measure. -/
def dirac (a : α) : measure α :=
(outer_measure.dirac a).to_measure (by simp)
@[simp] lemma dirac_apply (a : α) {s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) :
(dirac a : measure α) s = ⨆ h : a ∈ s, 1 :=
to_measure_apply _ _ hs
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
def sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → measure α) : measure α :=
(outer_measure.sum (λ i, (f i).to_outer_measure)).to_measure $
le_trans
(by exact le_infi (λ i, le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory _))
(outer_measure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
/-- Counting measure on any measurable space. -/
def count : measure α := sum dirac
@[class] def is_complete {α} {_:measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) : Prop :=
∀ s, μ s = 0 → is_measurable s
/-- The "almost everywhere" filter of co-null sets. -/
def a_e (μ : measure α) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | μ (-s) = 0},
univ_sets := by simp [measure_empty],
inter_sets := λ s t hs ht, by simp [compl_inter]; exact measure_union_null hs ht,
sets_of_superset := λ s t hs hst, measure_mono_null (set.compl_subset_compl.2 hst) hs }
lemma mem_a_e_iff (s : set α) : s ∈ μ.a_e.sets ↔ μ (- s) = 0 := iff.refl _
end measure
end measure_theory
section is_complete
open measure_theory
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α)
def is_null_measurable (s : set α) : Prop :=
∃ t z, s = t ∪ z ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ z = 0
theorem is_null_measurable_iff {μ : measure α} {s : set α} :
is_null_measurable μ s ↔
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ (s \ t) = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨t, z, rfl, ht, hz⟩,
refine ⟨t, set.subset_union_left _ _, ht, measure_mono_null _ hz⟩,
simp [union_diff_left, diff_subset] },
{ rintro ⟨t, st, ht, hz⟩,
exact ⟨t, _, (union_diff_cancel st).symm, ht, hz⟩ }
end
theorem is_null_measurable_measure_eq {μ : measure α} {s t : set α}
(st : t ⊆ s) (hz : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ s = μ t :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (measure_mono st),
have := measure_union_le t (s \ t),
rw [union_diff_cancel st, hz] at this, simpa
end
theorem is_measurable.is_null_measurable
{s : set α} (hs : is_measurable s) : is_null_measurable μ s :=
⟨s, ∅, by simp, hs, μ.empty⟩
theorem is_null_measurable_of_complete [c : μ.is_complete]
{s : set α} : is_null_measurable μ s ↔ is_measurable s :=
⟨by rintro ⟨t, z, rfl, ht, hz⟩; exact
is_measurable.union ht (c _ hz),
λ h, h.is_null_measurable _⟩
variables {μ}
theorem is_null_measurable.union_null {s z : set α}
(hs : is_null_measurable μ s) (hz : μ z = 0) :
is_null_measurable μ (s ∪ z) :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨t, z', rfl, ht, hz'⟩,
exact ⟨t, z' ∪ z, set.union_assoc _ _ _, ht, le_zero_iff_eq.1
(le_trans (measure_union_le _ _) $ by simp [hz, hz'])⟩
end
theorem null_is_null_measurable {z : set α}
(hz : μ z = 0) : is_null_measurable μ z :=
by simpa using (is_measurable.empty.is_null_measurable _).union_null hz
theorem is_null_measurable.Union_nat {s : ℕ → set α}
(hs : ∀ i, is_null_measurable μ (s i)) :
is_null_measurable μ (Union s) :=
begin
choose t ht using assume i, is_null_measurable_iff.1 (hs i),
simp [forall_and_distrib] at ht,
rcases ht with ⟨st, ht, hz⟩,
refine is_null_measurable_iff.2
⟨Union t, Union_subset_Union st, is_measurable.Union ht,
measure_mono_null _ (measure_Union_null hz)⟩,
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← Union_union_distrib],
exact Union_subset_Union (λ i, by rw ← diff_subset_iff)
end
theorem is_measurable.diff_null {s z : set α}
(hs : is_measurable s) (hz : μ z = 0) :
is_null_measurable μ (s \ z) :=
begin
rw measure_eq_infi at hz,
choose f hf using show ∀ q : {q:ℚ//q>0}, ∃ t:set α,
z ⊆ t ∧ is_measurable t ∧ μ t < (nnreal.of_real q.1 : ennreal),
{ rintro ⟨ε, ε0⟩,
have : 0 < (nnreal.of_real ε : ennreal), { simpa using ε0 },
rw ← hz at this, simpa [infi_lt_iff] },
refine is_null_measurable_iff.2 ⟨s \ Inter f,
diff_subset_diff_right (subset_Inter (λ i, (hf i).1)),
hs.diff (is_measurable.Inter (λ i, (hf i).2.1)),
measure_mono_null _ (le_zero_iff_eq.1 $ le_of_not_lt $ λ h, _)⟩,
{ exact Inter f },
{ rw [diff_subset_iff, diff_union_self],
exact subset.trans (diff_subset _ _) (subset_union_left _ _) },
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h with ⟨ε, ε0', ε0, h⟩,
simp at ε0,
apply not_le_of_lt (lt_trans (hf ⟨ε, ε0⟩).2.2 h),
exact measure_mono (Inter_subset _ _)
end
theorem is_null_measurable.diff_null {s z : set α}
(hs : is_null_measurable μ s) (hz : μ z = 0) :
is_null_measurable μ (s \ z) :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨t, z', rfl, ht, hz'⟩,
rw [set.union_diff_distrib],
exact (ht.diff_null hz).union_null (measure_mono_null (diff_subset _ _) hz')
end
theorem is_null_measurable.compl {s : set α}
(hs : is_null_measurable μ s) :
is_null_measurable μ (-s) :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨t, z, rfl, ht, hz⟩,
rw compl_union,
exact ht.compl.diff_null hz
end
def null_measurable {α : Type u} [measurable_space α]
(μ : measure α) : measurable_space α :=
{ is_measurable := is_null_measurable μ,
is_measurable_empty := is_measurable.empty.is_null_measurable _,
is_measurable_compl := λ s hs, hs.compl,
is_measurable_Union := λ f, is_null_measurable.Union_nat }
def completion {α : Type u} [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α) :
@measure_theory.measure α (null_measurable μ) :=
{ to_outer_measure := μ.to_outer_measure,
m_Union := λ s hs hd, show μ (Union s) = ∑ i, μ (s i), begin
choose t ht using assume i, is_null_measurable_iff.1 (hs i),
simp [forall_and_distrib] at ht, rcases ht with ⟨st, ht, hz⟩,
rw is_null_measurable_measure_eq (Union_subset_Union st),
{ rw measure_Union _ ht,
{ congr, funext i,
exact (is_null_measurable_measure_eq (st i) (hz i)).symm },
{ rintro i j ij x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
exact hd i j ij ⟨st i h₁, st j h₂⟩ } },
{ refine measure_mono_null _ (measure_Union_null hz),
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← Union_union_distrib],
exact Union_subset_Union (λ i, by rw ← diff_subset_iff) }
end,
trimmed := begin
letI := null_measurable μ,
refine le_antisymm (λ s, _) (outer_measure.trim_ge _),
rw outer_measure.trim_eq_infi,
dsimp, clear _inst,
rw measure_eq_infi s,
exact infi_le_infi (λ t, infi_le_infi $ λ st,
infi_le_infi2 $ λ ht, ⟨ht.is_null_measurable _, le_refl _⟩)
end }
instance completion.is_complete {α : Type u} [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α) :
(completion μ).is_complete :=
λ z hz, null_is_null_measurable hz
end is_complete
namespace measure_theory
/-- A measure space is a measurable space equipped with a
measure, referred to as `volume`. -/
class measure_space (α : Type*) extends measurable_space α :=
(μ {} : measure α)
section measure_space
variables {α : Type*} [measure_space α] {s₁ s₂ : set α}
open measure_space
def volume : set α → ennreal := @μ α _
@[simp] lemma volume_empty : volume (∅ : set α) = 0 := μ.empty
lemma volume_mono : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → volume s₁ ≤ volume s₂ := measure_mono
lemma volume_mono_null : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → volume s₂ = 0 → volume s₁ = 0 :=
measure_mono_null
theorem volume_Union_le {β} [encodable β] :
∀ (s : β → set α), volume (⋃i, s i) ≤ (∑i, volume (s i)) :=
measure_Union_le
lemma volume_Union_null {β} [encodable β] {s : β → set α} :
(∀ i, volume (s i) = 0) → volume (⋃i, s i) = 0 :=
measure_Union_null
theorem volume_union_le : ∀ (s₁ s₂ : set α), volume (s₁ ∪ s₂) ≤ volume s₁ + volume s₂ :=
measure_union_le
lemma volume_union_null : volume s₁ = 0 → volume s₂ = 0 → volume (s₁ ∪ s₂) = 0 :=
measure_union_null
lemma volume_Union {β} [encodable β] {f : β → set α} :
pairwise (disjoint on f) → (∀i, is_measurable (f i)) →
volume (⋃i, f i) = (∑i, volume (f i)) :=
measure_Union
lemma volume_union : disjoint s₁ s₂ → is_measurable s₁ → is_measurable s₂ →
volume (s₁ ∪ s₂) = volume s₁ + volume s₂ :=
measure_union
lemma volume_bUnion {β} {s : set β} {f : β → set α} : countable s →
pairwise_on s (disjoint on f) → (∀b∈s, is_measurable (f b)) →
volume (⋃b∈s, f b) = ∑p:s, volume (f p.1) :=
measure_bUnion
lemma volume_sUnion {S : set (set α)} : countable S →
pairwise_on S disjoint → (∀s∈S, is_measurable s) →
volume (⋃₀ S) = ∑s:S, volume s.1 :=
measure_sUnion
lemma volume_bUnion_finset {β} {s : finset β} {f : β → set α}
(hd : pairwise_on ↑s (disjoint on f)) (hm : ∀b∈s, is_measurable (f b)) :
volume (⋃b∈s, f b) = s.sum (λp, volume (f p)) :=
show volume (⋃b∈(↑s : set β), f b) = s.sum (λp, volume (f p)),
begin
rw [volume_bUnion (countable_finite (finset.finite_to_set s)) hd hm, tsum_eq_sum],
{ show s.attach.sum (λb:(↑s : set β), volume (f b)) = s.sum (λb, volume (f b)),
exact @finset.sum_attach _ _ s _ (λb, volume (f b)) },
simp
end
lemma volume_diff : s₂ ⊆ s₁ → is_measurable s₁ → is_measurable s₂ →
volume s₂ < ⊤ → volume (s₁ \ s₂) = volume s₁ - volume s₂ :=
measure_diff
/-- `∀ₘ a:α, p a` states that the property `p` is almost everywhere true in the measure space
associated with `α`. This means that the measure of the complementary of `p` is `0`.
In a probability measure, the measure of `p` is `1`, when `p` is measurable.
-/
def all_ae (p : α → Prop) : Prop := { a | p a } ∈ (@measure_space.μ α _).a_e
notation `∀ₘ` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, all_ae P) := r
lemma all_ae_congr {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ₘ a, p a ↔ q a) : (∀ₘ a, p a) ↔ (∀ₘ a, q a) :=
iff.intro
(assume h', by filter_upwards [h, h'] assume a hpq hp, hpq.1 hp)
(assume h', by filter_upwards [h, h'] assume a hpq hq, hpq.2 hq)
lemma all_ae_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ₘ a, p a) ↔ volume { a | ¬ p a } = 0 := iff.refl _
lemma all_ae_of_all {p : α → Prop} : (∀a, p a) → ∀ₘ a, p a := assume h,
by {rw all_ae_iff, convert volume_empty, simp only [h, not_true], reflexivity}
lemma all_ae_all_iff {ι : Type*} [encodable ι] {p : α → ι → Prop} :
(∀ₘ a, ∀i, p a i) ↔ (∀i, ∀ₘ a, p a i) :=
begin
refine iff.intro (assume h i, _) (assume h, _),
{ filter_upwards [h] assume a ha, ha i },
{ have h := measure_Union_null h,
rw [← compl_Inter] at h,
filter_upwards [h] assume a, mem_Inter.1 }
end
end measure_space
end measure_theory
|
85dbb6baedfa01f2ab3dd77b97c41a697e699d01 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /stage0/src/Init/Control/ExceptCps.lean | 0fab865ead7405f4634b38d1f577a44208f55798 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,935 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful
/-
The Exception monad transformer using CPS style.
-/
def ExceptCpsT (ε : Type u) (m : Type u → Type v) (α : Type u) := (β : Type u) → (α → m β) → (ε → m β) → m β
namespace ExceptCpsT
@[inline] def run {ε α : Type u} [Monad m] (x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) : m (Except ε α) :=
x _ (fun a => pure (Except.ok a)) (fun e => pure (Except.error e))
@[inline] def runK {ε α : Type u} (x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) (s : ε) (ok : α → m β) (error : ε → m β) : m β :=
x _ ok error
@[inline] def runCatch [Monad m] (x : ExceptCpsT α m α) : m α :=
x _ pure pure
instance : Monad (ExceptCpsT ε m) where
map f x := fun _ k₁ k₂ => x _ (fun a => k₁ (f a)) k₂
pure a := fun _ k _ => k a
bind x f := fun _ k₁ k₂ => x _ (fun a => f a _ k₁ k₂) k₂
instance : LawfulMonad (ExceptCpsT σ m) := by
refine! { .. } <;> intros <;> rfl
instance : MonadExceptOf ε (ExceptCpsT ε m) where
throw e := fun _ _ k => k e
tryCatch x handle := fun _ k₁ k₂ => x _ k₁ (fun e => handle e _ k₁ k₂)
@[inline] def lift [Monad m] (x : m α) : ExceptCpsT ε m α :=
fun _ k _ => x >>= k
instance [Monad m] : MonadLift m (ExceptCpsT σ m) where
monadLift := ExceptCpsT.lift
instance [Inhabited ε] : Inhabited (ExceptCpsT ε m α) where
default := fun _ k₁ k₂ => k₂ arbitrary
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] : run (pure x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) = pure (Except.ok x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_lift {α ε : Type u} [Monad m] (x : m α) : run (ExceptCpsT.lift x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) = x >>= fun a => pure (Except.ok a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptCpsT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] (x : m α) (f : α → ExceptCpsT ε m β) : run (ExceptCpsT.lift x >>= f : ExceptCpsT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_throw [Monad m] (e : ε) (f : α → ExceptCpsT ε m β) : run (throw e >>= f : ExceptCpsT ε m β) = run (throw e) := rfl
@[simp] theorem runCatch_pure [Monad m] : runCatch (pure x : ExceptCpsT α m α) = pure x := rfl
@[simp] theorem runCatch_lift {α : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : runCatch (ExceptCpsT.lift x : ExceptCpsT α m α) = x := by
simp [runCatch, lift]
@[simp] theorem runCatch_throw [Monad m] : runCatch (throw a : ExceptCpsT α m α) = pure a := rfl
@[simp] theorem runCatch_bind_lift [Monad m] (x : m α) (f : α → ExceptCpsT β m β) : runCatch (ExceptCpsT.lift x >>= f : ExceptCpsT β m β) = x >>= fun a => runCatch (f a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem runCatch_bind_throw [Monad m] (e : β) (f : α → ExceptCpsT β m β) : runCatch (throw e >>= f : ExceptCpsT β m β) = pure e := rfl
end ExceptCpsT
|
d7441d178b0fee7e7839d81adf6254473af1463e | 5ee26964f602030578ef0159d46145dd2e357ba5 | /src/Huber_ring/basic.lean | a43bd58e6cd1847ba1e73e0c06a4e4e04b87ba9a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/lean-perfectoid-spaces | 569b4006fdfe491ca8b58dd817bb56138ada761f | 06cec51438b168837fc6e9268945735037fd1db6 | refs/heads/master | 1,590,154,571,918 | 1,557,685,392,000 | 1,557,685,392,000 | 186,363,547 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,557,730,933,000 | 1,557,730,933,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,726 | lean | import topology.algebra.ring
import ring_theory.algebra_operations
import group_theory.subgroup
import power_bounded
import for_mathlib.submodule
-- f-adic rings are called Huber rings by Scholze. A Huber ring is a topological
-- ring A which contains an open subring A0 such that the subspace topology on A0 is
-- I-adic, where I is a finitely generated ideal of A0. The pair (A0, I) is called
-- a pair of definition (pod) and is not part of the data.
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.prop_decidable
universes u v
section
open set
structure Huber_ring.ring_of_definition
(A₀ : Type*) (A : Type*)
[comm_ring A₀] [topological_space A₀] [topological_ring A₀]
[comm_ring A] [topological_space A] [topological_ring A]
extends algebra A₀ A :=
(emb : embedding to_fun)
(hf : is_open (range to_fun))
(J : ideal A₀)
(fin : J.fg)
(top : is_ideal_adic J)
class Huber_ring (A : Type u) extends comm_ring A, topological_space A, topological_ring A :=
(pod : ∃ (A₀ : Type u) [comm_ring A₀] [topological_space A₀] [topological_ring A₀],
by exactI nonempty (Huber_ring.ring_of_definition A₀ A))
end
namespace Huber_ring
open topological_add_group
variables {A : Type u} [Huber_ring A]
protected lemma nonarchimedean : nonarchimedean A :=
begin
rcases Huber_ring.pod A with ⟨A₀, H₁, H₂, H₃, H₄, emb, hf, J, Hfin, Htop⟩,
resetI,
apply nonarchimedean_of_nonarchimedean_open_embedding (algebra_map A) emb hf,
exact Htop.nonarchimedean,
end
instance power_bounded_subring.is_subring : is_subring (power_bounded_subring A) :=
power_bounded_subring.is_subring Huber_ring.nonarchimedean
lemma exists_pod_subset (U : set A) (hU : U ∈ nhds (0:A)) :
∃ (A₀ : Type u) [comm_ring A₀] [topological_space A₀],
by exactI ∃ [topological_ring A₀],
by exactI ∃ (rod : ring_of_definition A₀ A),
by letI := ring_of_definition.to_algebra rod;
exact (algebra_map A : A₀ → A) '' (rod.J) ⊆ U :=
begin
unfreezeI,
rcases ‹Huber_ring A› with ⟨_, _, _, ⟨A₀, _, _, _, ⟨⟨alg, emb, hf, J, fin, top⟩⟩⟩⟩,
resetI,
rw is_ideal_adic_iff at top,
cases top with H₁ H₂,
cases H₂ (algebra_map A ⁻¹' U) _ with n hn,
refine ⟨A₀, ‹_›, ‹_›, ‹_›, ⟨⟨alg, emb, hf, _, _, _⟩, _⟩⟩,
{ exact J^(n+1) },
{ exact submodule.fg_pow J fin _, },
{ apply is_ideal_adic_pow top, apply nat.succ_pos },
{ change algebra_map A '' ↑(J ^ (n + 1)) ⊆ U,
rw set.image_subset_iff,
exact set.subset.trans (J.pow_le_pow $ nat.le_succ n) hn },
{ apply emb.continuous.tendsto,
rw show algebra.to_fun A (0:A₀) = 0,
{ apply is_ring_hom.map_zero },
exact hU }
end
end Huber_ring
|
ef2cb737410ecff2b59bd3e8122276105349f024 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/linear_algebra/matrix/spectrum.lean | dcb3368c8c7b43b0dc846b5eb5287e81980b6a15 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,721 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import analysis.inner_product_space.spectrum
import linear_algebra.matrix.hermitian
/-! # Spectral theory of hermitian matrices
This file proves the spectral theorem for matrices. The proof of the spectral theorem is based on
the spectral theorem for linear maps (`diagonalization_basis_apply_self_apply`).
## Tags
spectral theorem, diagonalization theorem
-/
namespace matrix
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] [decidable_eq 𝕜] {n : Type*} [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
variables {A : matrix n n 𝕜}
open_locale matrix
open_locale big_operators
namespace is_hermitian
variables (hA : A.is_hermitian)
/-- The eigenvalues of a hermitian matrix, indexed by `fin (fintype.card n)` where `n` is the index
type of the matrix. -/
noncomputable def eigenvalues₀ : fin (fintype.card n) → ℝ :=
(is_hermitian_iff_is_symmetric.1 hA).eigenvalues finrank_euclidean_space
/-- The eigenvalues of a hermitian matrix, reusing the index `n` of the matrix entries. -/
noncomputable def eigenvalues : n → ℝ :=
λ i, hA.eigenvalues₀ $ (fintype.equiv_of_card_eq (fintype.card_fin _)).symm i
/-- A choice of an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of a hermitian matrix. -/
noncomputable def eigenvector_basis : orthonormal_basis n 𝕜 (euclidean_space 𝕜 n) :=
((is_hermitian_iff_is_symmetric.1 hA).eigenvector_basis finrank_euclidean_space).reindex
(fintype.equiv_of_card_eq (fintype.card_fin _))
/-- A matrix whose columns are an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of a hermitian matrix. -/
noncomputable def eigenvector_matrix : matrix n n 𝕜 :=
(pi_Lp.basis_fun _ 𝕜 n).to_matrix (eigenvector_basis hA).to_basis
/-- The inverse of `eigenvector_matrix` -/
noncomputable def eigenvector_matrix_inv : matrix n n 𝕜 :=
(eigenvector_basis hA).to_basis.to_matrix (pi_Lp.basis_fun _ 𝕜 n)
lemma eigenvector_matrix_mul_inv :
hA.eigenvector_matrix ⬝ hA.eigenvector_matrix_inv = 1 :=
by apply basis.to_matrix_mul_to_matrix_flip
noncomputable instance : invertible hA.eigenvector_matrix_inv :=
invertible_of_left_inverse _ _ hA.eigenvector_matrix_mul_inv
noncomputable instance : invertible hA.eigenvector_matrix :=
invertible_of_right_inverse _ _ hA.eigenvector_matrix_mul_inv
lemma eigenvector_matrix_apply (i j : n) : hA.eigenvector_matrix i j = hA.eigenvector_basis j i :=
by simp_rw [eigenvector_matrix, basis.to_matrix_apply, orthonormal_basis.coe_to_basis,
pi_Lp.basis_fun_repr]
lemma eigenvector_matrix_inv_apply (i j : n) :
hA.eigenvector_matrix_inv i j = star (hA.eigenvector_basis i j) :=
begin
rw [eigenvector_matrix_inv, basis.to_matrix_apply, orthonormal_basis.coe_to_basis_repr_apply,
orthonormal_basis.repr_apply_apply, pi_Lp.basis_fun_apply, pi_Lp.equiv_symm_single,
euclidean_space.inner_single_right, one_mul, is_R_or_C.star_def],
end
lemma conj_transpose_eigenvector_matrix_inv : hA.eigenvector_matrix_invᴴ = hA.eigenvector_matrix :=
by { ext i j,
rw [conj_transpose_apply, eigenvector_matrix_inv_apply, eigenvector_matrix_apply, star_star] }
lemma conj_transpose_eigenvector_matrix : hA.eigenvector_matrixᴴ = hA.eigenvector_matrix_inv :=
by rw [← conj_transpose_eigenvector_matrix_inv, conj_transpose_conj_transpose]
/-- *Diagonalization theorem*, *spectral theorem* for matrices; A hermitian matrix can be
diagonalized by a change of basis.
For the spectral theorem on linear maps, see `diagonalization_basis_apply_self_apply`. -/
theorem spectral_theorem :
hA.eigenvector_matrix_inv ⬝ A =
diagonal (coe ∘ hA.eigenvalues) ⬝ hA.eigenvector_matrix_inv :=
begin
rw [eigenvector_matrix_inv, pi_Lp.basis_to_matrix_basis_fun_mul],
ext i j,
have : linear_map.is_symmetric _ := is_hermitian_iff_is_symmetric.1 hA,
convert this.diagonalization_basis_apply_self_apply finrank_euclidean_space
(euclidean_space.single j 1)
((fintype.equiv_of_card_eq (fintype.card_fin _)).symm i),
{ dsimp only [linear_equiv.conj_apply_apply, pi_Lp.linear_equiv_apply,
pi_Lp.linear_equiv_symm_apply, pi_Lp.equiv_single, linear_map.std_basis,
linear_map.coe_single, pi_Lp.equiv_symm_single, linear_equiv.symm_symm,
eigenvector_basis, to_lin'_apply],
simp only [basis.to_matrix, basis.coe_to_orthonormal_basis_repr, basis.equiv_fun_apply],
simp_rw [orthonormal_basis.coe_to_basis_repr_apply, orthonormal_basis.reindex_repr,
linear_equiv.symm_symm, pi_Lp.linear_equiv_apply, pi_Lp.equiv_single, mul_vec_single,
mul_one],
refl },
{ simp only [diagonal_mul, (∘), eigenvalues, eigenvector_basis],
rw [basis.to_matrix_apply,
orthonormal_basis.coe_to_basis_repr_apply, orthonormal_basis.reindex_repr,
eigenvalues₀, pi_Lp.basis_fun_apply, pi_Lp.equiv_symm_single] }
end
lemma eigenvalues_eq (i : n) :
hA.eigenvalues i =
is_R_or_C.re ((star (hA.eigenvector_matrixᵀ i) ⬝ᵥ (A.mul_vec (hA.eigenvector_matrixᵀ i)))) :=
begin
have := hA.spectral_theorem,
rw [←matrix.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible] at this,
have := congr_arg is_R_or_C.re (congr_fun (congr_fun this i) i),
rw [diagonal_apply_eq, is_R_or_C.of_real_re, inv_eq_left_inv hA.eigenvector_matrix_mul_inv,
← conj_transpose_eigenvector_matrix, mul_mul_apply] at this,
exact this.symm,
end
/-- The determinant of a hermitian matrix is the product of its eigenvalues. -/
lemma det_eq_prod_eigenvalues : det A = ∏ i, hA.eigenvalues i :=
begin
apply mul_left_cancel₀ (det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse (eigenvector_matrix_mul_inv hA)),
rw [←det_mul, spectral_theorem, det_mul, mul_comm, det_diagonal]
end
end is_hermitian
end matrix
|
28b87a672f71e63cfcabb7fecfd70bd066b10694 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/geometry/manifold/charted_space.lean | 3d5cdb0cf3102638da7f39fb337db314ae7fd639 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 44,719 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.local_homeomorph
/-!
# Charted spaces
A smooth manifold is a topological space `M` locally modelled on a euclidean space (or a euclidean
half-space for manifolds with boundaries, or an infinite dimensional vector space for more general
notions of manifolds), i.e., the manifold is covered by open subsets on which there are local
homeomorphisms (the charts) going to a model space `H`, and the changes of charts should be smooth
maps.
In this file, we introduce a general framework describing these notions, where the model space is an
arbitrary topological space. We avoid the word *manifold*, which should be reserved for the
situation where the model space is a (subset of a) vector space, and use the terminology
*charted space* instead.
If the changes of charts satisfy some additional property (for instance if they are smooth), then
`M` inherits additional structure (it makes sense to talk about smooth manifolds). There are
therefore two different ingredients in a charted space:
* the set of charts, which is data
* the fact that changes of charts belong to some group (in fact groupoid), which is additional Prop.
We separate these two parts in the definition: the charted space structure is just the set of
charts, and then the different smoothness requirements (smooth manifold, orientable manifold,
contact manifold, and so on) are additional properties of these charts. These properties are
formalized through the notion of structure groupoid, i.e., a set of local homeomorphisms stable
under composition and inverse, to which the change of coordinates should belong.
## Main definitions
* `structure_groupoid H` : a subset of local homeomorphisms of `H` stable under composition,
inverse and restriction (ex: local diffeos).
* `continuous_groupoid H` : the groupoid of all local homeomorphisms of `H`
* `charted_space H M` : charted space structure on `M` modelled on `H`, given by an atlas of
local homeomorphisms from `M` to `H` whose sources cover `M`. This is a type class.
* `has_groupoid M G` : when `G` is a structure groupoid on `H` and `M` is a charted space
modelled on `H`, require that all coordinate changes belong to `G`. This is a type class.
* `atlas H M` : when `M` is a charted space modelled on `H`, the atlas of this charted
space structure, i.e., the set of charts.
* `G.maximal_atlas M` : when `M` is a charted space modelled on `H` and admitting `G` as a
structure groupoid, one can consider all the local homeomorphisms from `M` to `H` such that
changing coordinate from any chart to them belongs to `G`. This is a larger atlas, called the
maximal atlas (for the groupoid `G`).
* `structomorph G M M'` : the type of diffeomorphisms between the charted spaces `M` and `M'` for
the groupoid `G`. We avoid the word diffeomorphism, keeping it for the smooth category.
As a basic example, we give the instance
`instance charted_space_model_space (H : Type*) [topological_space H] : charted_space H H`
saying that a topological space is a charted space over itself, with the identity as unique chart.
This charted space structure is compatible with any groupoid.
Additional useful definitions:
* `pregroupoid H` : a subset of local mas of `H` stable under composition and
restriction, but not inverse (ex: smooth maps)
* `groupoid_of_pregroupoid` : construct a groupoid from a pregroupoid, by requiring that a map and
its inverse both belong to the pregroupoid (ex: construct diffeos from smooth maps)
* `chart_at H x` is a preferred chart at `x : M` when `M` has a charted space structure modelled on
`H`.
* `G.compatible he he'` states that, for any two charts `e` and `e'` in the atlas, the composition
of `e.symm` and `e'` belongs to the groupoid `G` when `M` admits `G` as a structure groupoid.
* `G.compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas he he'` states that, for any two charts `e` and `e'` in the
maximal atlas associated to the groupoid `G`, the composition of `e.symm` and `e'` belongs to the
`G` if `M` admits `G` as a structure groupoid.
* `charted_space_core.to_charted_space`: consider a space without a topology, but endowed with a set
of charts (which are local equivs) for which the change of coordinates are local homeos. Then
one can construct a topology on the space for which the charts become local homeos, defining
a genuine charted space structure.
## Implementation notes
The atlas in a charted space is *not* a maximal atlas in general: the notion of maximality depends
on the groupoid one considers, and changing groupoids changes the maximal atlas. With the current
formalization, it makes sense first to choose the atlas, and then to ask whether this precise atlas
defines a smooth manifold, an orientable manifold, and so on. A consequence is that structomorphisms
between `M` and `M'` do *not* induce a bijection between the atlases of `M` and `M'`: the
definition is only that, read in charts, the structomorphism locally belongs to the groupoid under
consideration. (This is equivalent to inducing a bijection between elements of the maximal atlas).
A consequence is that the invariance under structomorphisms of properties defined in terms of the
atlas is not obvious in general, and could require some work in theory (amounting to the fact
that these properties only depend on the maximal atlas, for instance). In practice, this does not
create any real difficulty.
We use the letter `H` for the model space thinking of the case of manifolds with boundary, where the
model space is a half space.
Manifolds are sometimes defined as topological spaces with an atlas of local diffeomorphisms, and
sometimes as spaces with an atlas from which a topology is deduced. We use the former approach:
otherwise, there would be an instance from manifolds to topological spaces, which means that any
instance search for topological spaces would try to find manifold structures involving a yet
unknown model space, leading to problems. However, we also introduce the latter approach,
through a structure `charted_space_core` making it possible to construct a topology out of a set of
local equivs with compatibility conditions (but we do not register it as an instance).
In the definition of a charted space, the model space is written as an explicit parameter as there
can be several model spaces for a given topological space. For instance, a complex manifold
(modelled over `ℂ^n`) will also be seen sometimes as a real manifold modelled over `ℝ^(2n)`.
## Notations
In the locale `manifold`, we denote the composition of local homeomorphisms with `≫ₕ`, and the
composition of local equivs with `≫`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space
open filter
universes u
variables {H : Type u} {H' : Type*} {M : Type*} {M' : Type*} {M'' : Type*}
/- Notational shortcut for the composition of local homeomorphisms and local equivs, i.e.,
`local_homeomorph.trans` and `local_equiv.trans`.
Note that, as is usual for equivs, the composition is from left to right, hence the direction of
the arrow. -/
localized "infixr ` ≫ₕ `:100 := local_homeomorph.trans" in manifold
localized "infixr ` ≫ `:100 := local_equiv.trans" in manifold
/- `simp` looks for subsingleton instances at every call. This turns out to be very
inefficient, especially in `simp`-heavy parts of the library such as the manifold code.
Disable two such instances to speed up things.
NB: this is just a hack. TODO: fix `simp` properly. -/
localized "attribute [-instance] unique.subsingleton pi.subsingleton" in manifold
open set local_homeomorph
/-! ### Structure groupoids-/
section groupoid
/-! One could add to the definition of a structure groupoid the fact that the restriction of an
element of the groupoid to any open set still belongs to the groupoid.
(This is in Kobayashi-Nomizu.)
I am not sure I want this, for instance on `H × E` where `E` is a vector space, and the groupoid is
made of functions respecting the fibers and linear in the fibers (so that a charted space over this
groupoid is naturally a vector bundle) I prefer that the members of the groupoid are always
defined on sets of the form `s × E`. There is a typeclass `closed_under_restriction` for groupoids
which have the restriction property.
The only nontrivial requirement is locality: if a local homeomorphism belongs to the groupoid
around each point in its domain of definition, then it belongs to the groupoid. Without this
requirement, the composition of structomorphisms does not have to be a structomorphism. Note that
this implies that a local homeomorphism with empty source belongs to any structure groupoid, as
it trivially satisfies this condition.
There is also a technical point, related to the fact that a local homeomorphism is by definition a
global map which is a homeomorphism when restricted to its source subset (and its values outside
of the source are not relevant). Therefore, we also require that being a member of the groupoid only
depends on the values on the source.
We use primes in the structure names as we will reformulate them below (without primes) using a
`has_mem` instance, writing `e ∈ G` instead of `e ∈ G.members`.
-/
/-- A structure groupoid is a set of local homeomorphisms of a topological space stable under
composition and inverse. They appear in the definition of the smoothness class of a manifold. -/
structure structure_groupoid (H : Type u) [topological_space H] :=
(members : set (local_homeomorph H H))
(trans' : ∀e e' : local_homeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ∈ members → e ≫ₕ e' ∈ members)
(symm' : ∀e : local_homeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e.symm ∈ members)
(id_mem' : local_homeomorph.refl H ∈ members)
(locality' : ∀e : local_homeomorph H H, (∀x ∈ e.source, ∃s, is_open s ∧
x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ members) → e ∈ members)
(eq_on_source' : ∀ e e' : local_homeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ≈ e → e' ∈ members)
variable [topological_space H]
instance : has_mem (local_homeomorph H H) (structure_groupoid H) :=
⟨λ(e : local_homeomorph H H) (G : structure_groupoid H), e ∈ G.members⟩
lemma structure_groupoid.trans (G : structure_groupoid H) {e e' : local_homeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (he' : e' ∈ G) : e ≫ₕ e' ∈ G :=
G.trans' e e' he he'
lemma structure_groupoid.symm (G : structure_groupoid H) {e : local_homeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G) :
e.symm ∈ G :=
G.symm' e he
lemma structure_groupoid.id_mem (G : structure_groupoid H) :
local_homeomorph.refl H ∈ G :=
G.id_mem'
lemma structure_groupoid.locality (G : structure_groupoid H) {e : local_homeomorph H H}
(h : ∀x ∈ e.source, ∃s, is_open s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ G) :
e ∈ G :=
G.locality' e h
lemma structure_groupoid.eq_on_source (G : structure_groupoid H) {e e' : local_homeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (h : e' ≈ e) : e' ∈ G :=
G.eq_on_source' e e' he h
/-- Partial order on the set of groupoids, given by inclusion of the members of the groupoid -/
instance structure_groupoid.partial_order : partial_order (structure_groupoid H) :=
partial_order.lift structure_groupoid.members
(λa b h, by { cases a, cases b, dsimp at h, induction h, refl })
lemma structure_groupoid.le_iff {G₁ G₂ : structure_groupoid H} :
G₁ ≤ G₂ ↔ ∀ e, e ∈ G₁ → e ∈ G₂ :=
iff.rfl
/-- The trivial groupoid, containing only the identity (and maps with empty source, as this is
necessary from the definition) -/
def id_groupoid (H : Type u) [topological_space H] : structure_groupoid H :=
{ members := {local_homeomorph.refl H} ∪ {e : local_homeomorph H H | e.source = ∅},
trans' := λe e' he he', begin
cases he; simp at he he',
{ simpa only [he, refl_trans]},
{ have : (e ≫ₕ e').source ⊆ e.source := sep_subset _ _,
rw he at this,
have : (e ≫ₕ e') ∈ {e : local_homeomorph H H | e.source = ∅} := disjoint_iff.1 this,
exact (mem_union _ _ _).2 (or.inr this) },
end,
symm' := λe he, begin
cases (mem_union _ _ _).1 he with E E,
{ finish },
{ right,
simpa only [e.to_local_equiv.image_source_eq_target.symm] with mfld_simps using E},
end,
id_mem' := mem_union_left _ rfl,
locality' := λe he, begin
cases e.source.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ right, exact h },
{ left,
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
rcases he x hx with ⟨s, open_s, xs, hs⟩,
have x's : x ∈ (e.restr s).source,
{ rw [restr_source, open_s.interior_eq],
exact ⟨hx, xs⟩ },
cases hs,
{ replace hs : local_homeomorph.restr e s = local_homeomorph.refl H,
by simpa only using hs,
have : (e.restr s).source = univ, by { rw hs, simp },
change (e.to_local_equiv).source ∩ interior s = univ at this,
have : univ ⊆ interior s, by { rw ← this, exact inter_subset_right _ _ },
have : s = univ, by rwa [open_s.interior_eq, univ_subset_iff] at this,
simpa only [this, restr_univ] using hs },
{ exfalso,
rw mem_set_of_eq at hs,
rwa hs at x's } },
end,
eq_on_source' := λe e' he he'e, begin
cases he,
{ left,
have : e = e',
{ refine eq_of_eq_on_source_univ (setoid.symm he'e) _ _;
rw set.mem_singleton_iff.1 he ; refl },
rwa ← this },
{ right,
change (e.to_local_equiv).source = ∅ at he,
rwa [set.mem_set_of_eq, he'e.source_eq] }
end }
/-- Every structure groupoid contains the identity groupoid -/
instance : order_bot (structure_groupoid H) :=
{ bot := id_groupoid H,
bot_le := begin
assume u f hf,
change f ∈ {local_homeomorph.refl H} ∪ {e : local_homeomorph H H | e.source = ∅} at hf,
simp only [singleton_union, mem_set_of_eq, mem_insert_iff] at hf,
cases hf,
{ rw hf,
apply u.id_mem },
{ apply u.locality,
assume x hx,
rw [hf, mem_empty_eq] at hx,
exact hx.elim }
end,
..structure_groupoid.partial_order }
instance (H : Type u) [topological_space H] : inhabited (structure_groupoid H) :=
⟨id_groupoid H⟩
/-- To construct a groupoid, one may consider classes of local homeos such that both the function
and its inverse have some property. If this property is stable under composition,
one gets a groupoid. `pregroupoid` bundles the properties needed for this construction, with the
groupoid of smooth functions with smooth inverses as an application. -/
structure pregroupoid (H : Type*) [topological_space H] :=
(property : (H → H) → (set H) → Prop)
(comp : ∀{f g u v}, property f u → property g v → is_open u → is_open v → is_open (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
→ property (g ∘ f) (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v))
(id_mem : property id univ)
(locality : ∀{f u}, is_open u → (∀x∈u, ∃v, is_open v ∧ x ∈ v ∧ property f (u ∩ v)) → property f u)
(congr : ∀{f g : H → H} {u}, is_open u → (∀x∈u, g x = f x) → property f u → property g u)
/-- Construct a groupoid of local homeos for which the map and its inverse have some property,
from a pregroupoid asserting that this property is stable under composition. -/
def pregroupoid.groupoid (PG : pregroupoid H) : structure_groupoid H :=
{ members := {e : local_homeomorph H H | PG.property e e.source ∧ PG.property e.symm e.target},
trans' := λe e' he he', begin
split,
{ apply PG.comp he.1 he'.1 e.open_source e'.open_source,
apply e.continuous_to_fun.preimage_open_of_open e.open_source e'.open_source },
{ apply PG.comp he'.2 he.2 e'.open_target e.open_target,
apply e'.continuous_inv_fun.preimage_open_of_open e'.open_target e.open_target }
end,
symm' := λe he, ⟨he.2, he.1⟩,
id_mem' := ⟨PG.id_mem, PG.id_mem⟩,
locality' := λe he, begin
split,
{ apply PG.locality e.open_source (λx xu, _),
rcases he x xu with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩,
refine ⟨s, s_open, xs, _⟩,
convert hs.1 using 1,
dsimp [local_homeomorph.restr], rw s_open.interior_eq },
{ apply PG.locality e.open_target (λx xu, _),
rcases he (e.symm x) (e.map_target xu) with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩,
refine ⟨e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s, _, ⟨xu, xs⟩, _⟩,
{ exact continuous_on.preimage_open_of_open e.continuous_inv_fun e.open_target s_open },
{ rw [← inter_assoc, inter_self],
convert hs.2 using 1,
dsimp [local_homeomorph.restr], rw s_open.interior_eq } },
end,
eq_on_source' := λe e' he ee', begin
split,
{ apply PG.congr e'.open_source ee'.2,
simp only [ee'.1, he.1] },
{ have A := ee'.symm',
apply PG.congr e'.symm.open_source A.2,
convert he.2,
rw A.1,
refl }
end }
lemma mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid {PG : pregroupoid H} {e : local_homeomorph H H} :
e ∈ PG.groupoid ↔ PG.property e e.source ∧ PG.property e.symm e.target :=
iff.rfl
lemma groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le (PG₁ PG₂ : pregroupoid H)
(h : ∀f s, PG₁.property f s → PG₂.property f s) : PG₁.groupoid ≤ PG₂.groupoid :=
begin
refine structure_groupoid.le_iff.2 (λ e he, _),
rw mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid at he ⊢,
exact ⟨h _ _ he.1, h _ _ he.2⟩
end
lemma mem_pregroupoid_of_eq_on_source (PG : pregroupoid H) {e e' : local_homeomorph H H}
(he' : e ≈ e') (he : PG.property e e.source) : PG.property e' e'.source :=
begin
rw ← he'.1,
exact PG.congr e.open_source he'.eq_on.symm he,
end
/-- The pregroupoid of all local maps on a topological space `H` -/
@[reducible] def continuous_pregroupoid (H : Type*) [topological_space H] : pregroupoid H :=
{ property := λf s, true,
comp := λf g u v hf hg hu hv huv, trivial,
id_mem := trivial,
locality := λf u u_open h, trivial,
congr := λf g u u_open hcongr hf, trivial }
instance (H : Type*) [topological_space H] : inhabited (pregroupoid H) :=
⟨continuous_pregroupoid H⟩
/-- The groupoid of all local homeomorphisms on a topological space `H` -/
def continuous_groupoid (H : Type*) [topological_space H] : structure_groupoid H :=
pregroupoid.groupoid (continuous_pregroupoid H)
/-- Every structure groupoid is contained in the groupoid of all local homeomorphisms -/
instance : order_top (structure_groupoid H) :=
{ top := continuous_groupoid H,
le_top := λ u f hf, by { split; exact dec_trivial },
..structure_groupoid.partial_order }
/-- A groupoid is closed under restriction if it contains all restrictions of its element local
homeomorphisms to open subsets of the source. -/
class closed_under_restriction (G : structure_groupoid H) : Prop :=
(closed_under_restriction : ∀ {e : local_homeomorph H H}, e ∈ G → ∀ (s : set H), is_open s →
e.restr s ∈ G)
lemma closed_under_restriction' {G : structure_groupoid H} [closed_under_restriction G]
{e : local_homeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G) {s : set H} (hs : is_open s) :
e.restr s ∈ G :=
closed_under_restriction.closed_under_restriction he s hs
/-- The trivial restriction-closed groupoid, containing only local homeomorphisms equivalent to the
restriction of the identity to the various open subsets. -/
def id_restr_groupoid : structure_groupoid H :=
{ members := {e | ∃ {s : set H} (h : is_open s), e ≈ local_homeomorph.of_set s h},
trans' := begin
rintros e e' ⟨s, hs, hse⟩ ⟨s', hs', hse'⟩,
refine ⟨s ∩ s', is_open_inter hs hs', _⟩,
have := local_homeomorph.eq_on_source.trans' hse hse',
rwa local_homeomorph.of_set_trans_of_set at this,
end,
symm' := begin
rintros e ⟨s, hs, hse⟩,
refine ⟨s, hs, _⟩,
rw [← of_set_symm],
exact local_homeomorph.eq_on_source.symm' hse,
end,
id_mem' := ⟨univ, is_open_univ, by simp only with mfld_simps⟩,
locality' := begin
intros e h,
refine ⟨e.source, e.open_source, by simp only with mfld_simps, _⟩,
intros x hx,
rcases h x hx with ⟨s, hs, hxs, s', hs', hes'⟩,
have hes : x ∈ (e.restr s).source,
{ rw e.restr_source, refine ⟨hx, _⟩,
rw hs.interior_eq, exact hxs },
simpa only with mfld_simps using local_homeomorph.eq_on_source.eq_on hes' hes,
end,
eq_on_source' := begin
rintros e e' ⟨s, hs, hse⟩ hee',
exact ⟨s, hs, setoid.trans hee' hse⟩,
end
}
lemma id_restr_groupoid_mem {s : set H} (hs : is_open s) :
of_set s hs ∈ @id_restr_groupoid H _ := ⟨s, hs, by refl⟩
/-- The trivial restriction-closed groupoid is indeed `closed_under_restriction`. -/
instance closed_under_restriction_id_restr_groupoid :
closed_under_restriction (@id_restr_groupoid H _) :=
⟨ begin
rintros e ⟨s', hs', he⟩ s hs,
use [s' ∩ s, is_open_inter hs' hs],
refine setoid.trans (local_homeomorph.eq_on_source.restr he s) _,
exact ⟨by simp only [hs.interior_eq] with mfld_simps, by simp only with mfld_simps⟩,
end ⟩
/-- A groupoid is closed under restriction if and only if it contains the trivial restriction-closed
groupoid. -/
lemma closed_under_restriction_iff_id_le (G : structure_groupoid H) :
closed_under_restriction G ↔ id_restr_groupoid ≤ G :=
begin
split,
{ introsI _i,
apply structure_groupoid.le_iff.mpr,
rintros e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩,
refine G.eq_on_source _ hes,
convert closed_under_restriction' G.id_mem hs,
rw hs.interior_eq,
simp only with mfld_simps },
{ intros h,
split,
intros e he s hs,
rw ← of_set_trans (e : local_homeomorph H H) hs,
refine G.trans _ he,
apply structure_groupoid.le_iff.mp h,
exact id_restr_groupoid_mem hs },
end
/-- The groupoid of all local homeomorphisms on a topological space `H` is closed under restriction.
-/
instance : closed_under_restriction (continuous_groupoid H) :=
(closed_under_restriction_iff_id_le _).mpr (by convert le_top)
end groupoid
/-! ### Charted spaces -/
/-- A charted space is a topological space endowed with an atlas, i.e., a set of local
homeomorphisms taking value in a model space `H`, called charts, such that the domains of the charts
cover the whole space. We express the covering property by chosing for each `x` a member
`chart_at H x` of the atlas containing `x` in its source: in the smooth case, this is convenient to
construct the tangent bundle in an efficient way.
The model space is written as an explicit parameter as there can be several model spaces for a
given topological space. For instance, a complex manifold (modelled over `ℂ^n`) will also be seen
sometimes as a real manifold over `ℝ^(2n)`.
-/
class charted_space (H : Type*) [topological_space H] (M : Type*) [topological_space M] :=
(atlas [] : set (local_homeomorph M H))
(chart_at [] : M → local_homeomorph M H)
(mem_chart_source [] : ∀x, x ∈ (chart_at x).source)
(chart_mem_atlas [] : ∀x, chart_at x ∈ atlas)
export charted_space
attribute [simp, mfld_simps] mem_chart_source chart_mem_atlas
section charted_space
/-- Any space is a charted_space modelled over itself, by just using the identity chart -/
instance charted_space_self (H : Type*) [topological_space H] : charted_space H H :=
{ atlas := {local_homeomorph.refl H},
chart_at := λx, local_homeomorph.refl H,
mem_chart_source := λx, mem_univ x,
chart_mem_atlas := λx, mem_singleton _ }
/-- In the trivial charted_space structure of a space modelled over itself through the identity, the
atlas members are just the identity -/
@[simp, mfld_simps] lemma charted_space_self_atlas
{H : Type*} [topological_space H] {e : local_homeomorph H H} :
e ∈ atlas H H ↔ e = local_homeomorph.refl H :=
by simp [atlas, charted_space.atlas]
/-- In the model space, chart_at is always the identity -/
@[simp, mfld_simps] lemma chart_at_self_eq {H : Type*} [topological_space H] {x : H} :
chart_at H x = local_homeomorph.refl H :=
by simpa using chart_mem_atlas H x
section
variables (H) [topological_space H] [topological_space M] [charted_space H M]
lemma mem_chart_target (x : M) : chart_at H x x ∈ (chart_at H x).target :=
(chart_at H x).map_source (mem_chart_source _ _)
/-- If a topological space admits an atlas with locally compact charts, then the space itself
is locally compact. -/
lemma charted_space.locally_compact [locally_compact_space H] : locally_compact_space M :=
begin
have : ∀ (x : M), (𝓝 x).has_basis
(λ s, s ∈ 𝓝 (chart_at H x x) ∧ is_compact s ∧ s ⊆ (chart_at H x).target)
(λ s, (chart_at H x).symm '' s),
{ intro x,
rw [← (chart_at H x).symm_map_nhds_eq (mem_chart_source H x)],
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (chart_at H x x)).has_basis_self_subset
(mem_nhds_sets (chart_at H x).open_target (mem_chart_target H x))).map _ },
refine locally_compact_space_of_has_basis this _,
rintro x s ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩,
exact h₂.image_of_continuous_on ((chart_at H x).continuous_on_symm.mono h₃)
end
end
/-- Same thing as `H × H'`. We introduce it for technical reasons: a charted space `M` with model `H`
is a set of local charts from `M` to `H` covering the space. Every space is registered as a charted
space over itself, using the only chart `id`, in `manifold_model_space`. You can also define a product
of charted space `M` and `M'` (with model space `H × H'`) by taking the products of the charts. Now,
on `H × H'`, there are two charted space structures with model space `H × H'` itself, the one coming
from `manifold_model_space`, and the one coming from the product of the two `manifold_model_space` on
each component. They are equal, but not defeq (because the product of `id` and `id` is not defeq to
`id`), which is bad as we know. This expedient of renaming `H × H'` solves this problem. -/
def model_prod (H : Type*) (H' : Type*) := H × H'
section
local attribute [reducible] model_prod
instance model_prod_inhabited {α β : Type*} [inhabited α] [inhabited β] :
inhabited (model_prod α β) :=
⟨(default α, default β)⟩
instance (H : Type*) [topological_space H] (H' : Type*) [topological_space H'] :
topological_space (model_prod H H') :=
by apply_instance
/- Next lemma shows up often when dealing with derivatives, register it as simp. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps] lemma model_prod_range_prod_id
{H : Type*} {H' : Type*} {α : Type*} (f : H → α) :
range (λ (p : model_prod H H'), (f p.1, p.2)) = set.prod (range f) univ :=
by rw prod_range_univ_eq
end
/-- The product of two charted spaces is naturally a charted space, with the canonical
construction of the atlas of product maps. -/
instance prod_charted_space (H : Type*) [topological_space H]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [charted_space H M]
(H' : Type*) [topological_space H']
(M' : Type*) [topological_space M'] [charted_space H' M'] :
charted_space (model_prod H H') (M × M') :=
{ atlas :=
{f : (local_homeomorph (M×M') (model_prod H H')) |
∃ g ∈ charted_space.atlas H M, ∃ h ∈ (charted_space.atlas H' M'),
f = local_homeomorph.prod g h},
chart_at := λ x: (M × M'),
(charted_space.chart_at H x.1).prod (charted_space.chart_at H' x.2),
mem_chart_source :=
begin
intro x,
simp only with mfld_simps,
end,
chart_mem_atlas :=
begin
intro x,
use (charted_space.chart_at H x.1),
split,
{ apply chart_mem_atlas _, },
{ use (charted_space.chart_at H' x.2), simp only [chart_mem_atlas, eq_self_iff_true, and_self], }
end }
section prod_charted_space
variables [topological_space H] [topological_space M] [charted_space H M]
[topological_space H'] [topological_space M'] [charted_space H' M'] {x : M×M'}
@[simp, mfld_simps] lemma prod_charted_space_chart_at :
(chart_at (model_prod H H') x) = (chart_at H x.fst).prod (chart_at H' x.snd) := rfl
end prod_charted_space
end charted_space
/-! ### Constructing a topology from an atlas -/
/-- Sometimes, one may want to construct a charted space structure on a space which does not yet
have a topological structure, where the topology would come from the charts. For this, one needs
charts that are only local equivs, and continuity properties for their composition.
This is formalised in `charted_space_core`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure charted_space_core (H : Type*) [topological_space H] (M : Type*) :=
(atlas : set (local_equiv M H))
(chart_at : M → local_equiv M H)
(mem_chart_source : ∀x, x ∈ (chart_at x).source)
(chart_mem_atlas : ∀x, chart_at x ∈ atlas)
(open_source : ∀e e' : local_equiv M H, e ∈ atlas → e' ∈ atlas → is_open (e.symm.trans e').source)
(continuous_to_fun : ∀e e' : local_equiv M H, e ∈ atlas → e' ∈ atlas →
continuous_on (e.symm.trans e') (e.symm.trans e').source)
namespace charted_space_core
variables [topological_space H] (c : charted_space_core H M) {e : local_equiv M H}
/-- Topology generated by a set of charts on a Type. -/
protected def to_topological_space : topological_space M :=
topological_space.generate_from $ ⋃ (e : local_equiv M H) (he : e ∈ c.atlas)
(s : set H) (s_open : is_open s), {e ⁻¹' s ∩ e.source}
lemma open_source' (he : e ∈ c.atlas) : @is_open M c.to_topological_space e.source :=
begin
apply topological_space.generate_open.basic,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
refine ⟨e, he, univ, is_open_univ, _⟩,
simp only [set.univ_inter, set.preimage_univ]
end
lemma open_target (he : e ∈ c.atlas) : is_open e.target :=
begin
have E : e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' e.source = e.target :=
subset.antisymm (inter_subset_left _ _) (λx hx, ⟨hx,
local_equiv.target_subset_preimage_source _ hx⟩),
simpa [local_equiv.trans_source, E] using c.open_source e e he he
end
/-- An element of the atlas in a charted space without topology becomes a local homeomorphism
for the topology constructed from this atlas. The `local_homeomorph` version is given in this
definition. -/
protected def local_homeomorph (e : local_equiv M H) (he : e ∈ c.atlas) :
@local_homeomorph M H c.to_topological_space _ :=
{ open_source := by convert c.open_source' he,
open_target := by convert c.open_target he,
continuous_to_fun := begin
letI : topological_space M := c.to_topological_space,
rw continuous_on_open_iff (c.open_source' he),
assume s s_open,
rw inter_comm,
apply topological_space.generate_open.basic,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
exact ⟨e, he, ⟨s, s_open, rfl⟩⟩
end,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
letI : topological_space M := c.to_topological_space,
apply continuous_on_open_of_generate_from (c.open_target he),
assume t ht,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff] at ht,
rcases ht with ⟨e', e'_atlas, s, s_open, ts⟩,
rw ts,
let f := e.symm.trans e',
have : is_open (f ⁻¹' s ∩ f.source),
by simpa [inter_comm] using (continuous_on_open_iff (c.open_source e e' he e'_atlas)).1
(c.continuous_to_fun e e' he e'_atlas) s s_open,
have A : e' ∘ e.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' e'.source) =
e.target ∩ (e' ∘ e.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' e'.source),
by { rw [← inter_assoc, ← inter_assoc], congr' 1, exact inter_comm _ _ },
simpa [local_equiv.trans_source, preimage_inter, preimage_comp.symm, A] using this
end,
..e }
/-- Given a charted space without topology, endow it with a genuine charted space structure with
respect to the topology constructed from the atlas. -/
def to_charted_space : @charted_space H _ M c.to_topological_space :=
{ atlas := ⋃ (e : local_equiv M H) (he : e ∈ c.atlas), {c.local_homeomorph e he},
chart_at := λx, c.local_homeomorph (c.chart_at x) (c.chart_mem_atlas x),
mem_chart_source := λx, c.mem_chart_source x,
chart_mem_atlas := λx, begin
simp only [mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
exact ⟨c.chart_at x, c.chart_mem_atlas x, rfl⟩,
end }
end charted_space_core
/-! ### Charted space with a given structure groupoid -/
section has_groupoid
variables [topological_space H] [topological_space M] [charted_space H M]
section
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A charted space has an atlas in a groupoid `G` if the change of coordinates belong to the
groupoid -/
class has_groupoid {H : Type*} [topological_space H] (M : Type*) [topological_space M]
[charted_space H M] (G : structure_groupoid H) : Prop :=
(compatible [] : ∀{e e' : local_homeomorph M H}, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M → e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G)
end
/-- Reformulate in the `structure_groupoid` namespace the compatibility condition of charts in a
charted space admitting a structure groupoid, to make it more easily accessible with dot
notation. -/
lemma structure_groupoid.compatible {H : Type*} [topological_space H] (G : structure_groupoid H)
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [charted_space H M] [has_groupoid M G]
{e e' : local_homeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ atlas H M) (he' : e' ∈ atlas H M) :
e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G :=
has_groupoid.compatible G he he'
lemma has_groupoid_of_le {G₁ G₂ : structure_groupoid H} (h : has_groupoid M G₁) (hle : G₁ ≤ G₂) :
has_groupoid M G₂ :=
⟨ λ e e' he he', hle ((h.compatible : _) he he') ⟩
lemma has_groupoid_of_pregroupoid (PG : pregroupoid H)
(h : ∀{e e' : local_homeomorph M H}, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M
→ PG.property (e.symm ≫ₕ e') (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source) :
has_groupoid M (PG.groupoid) :=
⟨assume e e' he he', mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr ⟨h he he', h he' he⟩⟩
/-- The trivial charted space structure on the model space is compatible with any groupoid -/
instance has_groupoid_model_space (H : Type*) [topological_space H] (G : structure_groupoid H) :
has_groupoid H G :=
{ compatible := λe e' he he', begin
replace he : e ∈ atlas H H := he,
replace he' : e' ∈ atlas H H := he',
rw charted_space_self_atlas at he he',
simp [he, he', structure_groupoid.id_mem]
end }
/-- Any charted space structure is compatible with the groupoid of all local homeomorphisms -/
instance has_groupoid_continuous_groupoid : has_groupoid M (continuous_groupoid H) :=
⟨begin
assume e e' he he',
rw [continuous_groupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid],
simp only [and_self]
end⟩
section maximal_atlas
variables (M) (G : structure_groupoid H)
/-- Given a charted space admitting a structure groupoid, the maximal atlas associated to this
structure groupoid is the set of all local charts that are compatible with the atlas, i.e., such
that changing coordinates with an atlas member gives an element of the groupoid. -/
def structure_groupoid.maximal_atlas : set (local_homeomorph M H) :=
{e | ∀ e' ∈ atlas H M, e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G ∧ e'.symm ≫ₕ e ∈ G}
variable {M}
/-- The elements of the atlas belong to the maximal atlas for any structure groupoid -/
lemma structure_groupoid.mem_maximal_atlas_of_mem_atlas [has_groupoid M G]
{e : local_homeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ atlas H M) : e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M :=
λ e' he', ⟨G.compatible he he', G.compatible he' he⟩
lemma structure_groupoid.chart_mem_maximal_atlas [has_groupoid M G]
(x : M) : chart_at H x ∈ G.maximal_atlas M :=
G.mem_maximal_atlas_of_mem_atlas (chart_mem_atlas H x)
variable {G}
lemma mem_maximal_atlas_iff {e : local_homeomorph M H} :
e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M ↔ ∀ e' ∈ atlas H M, e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G ∧ e'.symm ≫ₕ e ∈ G :=
iff.rfl
/-- Changing coordinates between two elements of the maximal atlas gives rise to an element
of the structure groupoid. -/
lemma structure_groupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas {e e' : local_homeomorph M H}
(he : e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (he' : e' ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) : e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G :=
begin
apply G.locality (λ x hx, _),
set f := chart_at H (e.symm x) with hf,
let s := e.target ∩ (e.symm ⁻¹' f.source),
have hs : is_open s,
{ apply e.symm.continuous_to_fun.preimage_open_of_open; apply open_source },
have xs : x ∈ s, by { dsimp at hx, simp [s, hx] },
refine ⟨s, hs, xs, _⟩,
have A : e.symm ≫ₕ f ∈ G := (mem_maximal_atlas_iff.1 he f (chart_mem_atlas _ _)).1,
have B : f.symm ≫ₕ e' ∈ G := (mem_maximal_atlas_iff.1 he' f (chart_mem_atlas _ _)).2,
have C : (e.symm ≫ₕ f) ≫ₕ (f.symm ≫ₕ e') ∈ G := G.trans A B,
have D : (e.symm ≫ₕ f) ≫ₕ (f.symm ≫ₕ e') ≈ (e.symm ≫ₕ e').restr s := calc
(e.symm ≫ₕ f) ≫ₕ (f.symm ≫ₕ e') = e.symm ≫ₕ (f ≫ₕ f.symm) ≫ₕ e' : by simp [trans_assoc]
... ≈ e.symm ≫ₕ (of_set f.source f.open_source) ≫ₕ e' :
by simp [eq_on_source.trans', trans_self_symm]
... ≈ (e.symm ≫ₕ (of_set f.source f.open_source)) ≫ₕ e' : by simp [trans_assoc]
... ≈ (e.symm.restr s) ≫ₕ e' : by simp [s, trans_of_set']
... ≈ (e.symm ≫ₕ e').restr s : by simp [restr_trans],
exact G.eq_on_source C (setoid.symm D),
end
variable (G)
/-- In the model space, the identity is in any maximal atlas. -/
lemma structure_groupoid.id_mem_maximal_atlas : local_homeomorph.refl H ∈ G.maximal_atlas H :=
G.mem_maximal_atlas_of_mem_atlas (by simp)
end maximal_atlas
section singleton
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α]
variables (e : local_homeomorph α H)
/-- If a single local homeomorphism `e` from a space `α` into `H` has source covering the whole
space `α`, then that local homeomorphism induces an `H`-charted space structure on `α`.
(This condition is equivalent to `e` being an open embedding of `α` into `H`; see
`local_homeomorph.to_open_embedding` and `open_embedding.to_local_homeomorph`.) -/
def singleton_charted_space (h : e.source = set.univ) : charted_space H α :=
{ atlas := {e},
chart_at := λ _, e,
mem_chart_source := λ _, by simp only [h] with mfld_simps,
chart_mem_atlas := λ _, by tauto }
lemma singleton_charted_space_one_chart (h : e.source = set.univ) (e' : local_homeomorph α H)
(h' : e' ∈ (singleton_charted_space e h).atlas) : e' = e := h'
/-- Given a local homeomorphism `e` from a space `α` into `H`, if its source covers the whole
space `α`, then the induced charted space structure on `α` is `has_groupoid G` for any structure
groupoid `G` which is closed under restrictions. -/
lemma singleton_has_groupoid (h : e.source = set.univ) (G : structure_groupoid H)
[closed_under_restriction G] : @has_groupoid _ _ _ _ (singleton_charted_space e h) G :=
{ compatible := begin
intros e' e'' he' he'',
rw singleton_charted_space_one_chart e h e' he',
rw singleton_charted_space_one_chart e h e'' he'',
refine G.eq_on_source _ e.trans_symm_self,
have hle : id_restr_groupoid ≤ G := (closed_under_restriction_iff_id_le G).mp (by assumption),
exact structure_groupoid.le_iff.mp hle _ (id_restr_groupoid_mem _),
end }
end singleton
namespace topological_space.opens
open topological_space
variables (G : structure_groupoid H) [has_groupoid M G]
variables (s : opens M)
/-- An open subset of a charted space is naturally a charted space. -/
instance : charted_space H s :=
{ atlas := ⋃ (x : s), {@local_homeomorph.subtype_restr _ _ _ _ (chart_at H x.1) s ⟨x⟩},
chart_at := λ x, @local_homeomorph.subtype_restr _ _ _ _ (chart_at H x.1) s ⟨x⟩,
mem_chart_source := λ x, by { simp only with mfld_simps, exact (mem_chart_source H x.1) },
chart_mem_atlas := λ x, by { simp only [mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff], use x } }
/-- If a groupoid `G` is `closed_under_restriction`, then an open subset of a space which is
`has_groupoid G` is naturally `has_groupoid G`. -/
instance [closed_under_restriction G] : has_groupoid s G :=
{ compatible := begin
rintros e e' ⟨_, ⟨x, hc⟩, he⟩ ⟨_, ⟨x', hc'⟩, he'⟩,
haveI : nonempty s := ⟨x⟩,
simp only [hc.symm, mem_singleton_iff, subtype.val_eq_coe] at he,
simp only [hc'.symm, mem_singleton_iff, subtype.val_eq_coe] at he',
rw [he, he'],
convert G.eq_on_source _ (subtype_restr_symm_trans_subtype_restr s (chart_at H x) (chart_at H x')),
apply closed_under_restriction',
{ exact G.compatible (chart_mem_atlas H x) (chart_mem_atlas H x') },
{ exact preimage_open_of_open_symm (chart_at H x) s.2 },
end }
end topological_space.opens
/-! ### Structomorphisms -/
/-- A `G`-diffeomorphism between two charted spaces is a homeomorphism which, when read in the
charts, belongs to `G`. We avoid the word diffeomorph as it is too related to the smooth category,
and use structomorph instead. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure structomorph (G : structure_groupoid H) (M : Type*) (M' : Type*)
[topological_space M] [topological_space M'] [charted_space H M] [charted_space H M']
extends homeomorph M M' :=
(mem_groupoid : ∀c : local_homeomorph M H, ∀c' : local_homeomorph M' H,
c ∈ atlas H M → c' ∈ atlas H M' → c.symm ≫ₕ to_homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph ≫ₕ c' ∈ G)
variables [topological_space M'] [topological_space M'']
{G : structure_groupoid H} [charted_space H M'] [charted_space H M'']
/-- The identity is a diffeomorphism of any charted space, for any groupoid. -/
def structomorph.refl (M : Type*) [topological_space M] [charted_space H M]
[has_groupoid M G] : structomorph G M M :=
{ mem_groupoid := λc c' hc hc', begin
change (local_homeomorph.symm c) ≫ₕ (local_homeomorph.refl M) ≫ₕ c' ∈ G,
rw local_homeomorph.refl_trans,
exact has_groupoid.compatible G hc hc'
end,
..homeomorph.refl M }
/-- The inverse of a structomorphism is a structomorphism -/
def structomorph.symm (e : structomorph G M M') : structomorph G M' M :=
{ mem_groupoid := begin
assume c c' hc hc',
have : (c'.symm ≫ₕ e.to_homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph ≫ₕ c).symm ∈ G :=
G.symm (e.mem_groupoid c' c hc' hc),
rwa [trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm, trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm, symm_symm, trans_assoc]
at this,
end,
..e.to_homeomorph.symm}
/-- The composition of structomorphisms is a structomorphism -/
def structomorph.trans (e : structomorph G M M') (e' : structomorph G M' M'') : structomorph G M M'' :=
{ mem_groupoid := begin
/- Let c and c' be two charts in M and M''. We want to show that e' ∘ e is smooth in these
charts, around any point x. For this, let y = e (c⁻¹ x), and consider a chart g around y.
Then g ∘ e ∘ c⁻¹ and c' ∘ e' ∘ g⁻¹ are both smooth as e and e' are structomorphisms, so
their composition is smooth, and it coincides with c' ∘ e' ∘ e ∘ c⁻¹ around x. -/
assume c c' hc hc',
refine G.locality (λx hx, _),
let f₁ := e.to_homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph,
let f₂ := e'.to_homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph,
let f := (e.to_homeomorph.trans e'.to_homeomorph).to_local_homeomorph,
have feq : f = f₁ ≫ₕ f₂ := homeomorph.trans_to_local_homeomorph _ _,
-- define the atlas g around y
let y := (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁) x,
let g := chart_at H y,
have hg₁ := chart_mem_atlas H y,
have hg₂ := mem_chart_source H y,
let s := (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁).source ∩ (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁) ⁻¹' g.source,
have open_s : is_open s,
by apply (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁).continuous_to_fun.preimage_open_of_open; apply open_source,
have : x ∈ s,
{ split,
{ simp only [trans_source, preimage_univ, inter_univ, homeomorph.to_local_homeomorph_source],
rw trans_source at hx,
exact hx.1 },
{ exact hg₂ } },
refine ⟨s, open_s, this, _⟩,
let F₁ := (c.symm ≫ₕ f₁ ≫ₕ g) ≫ₕ (g.symm ≫ₕ f₂ ≫ₕ c'),
have A : F₁ ∈ G := G.trans (e.mem_groupoid c g hc hg₁) (e'.mem_groupoid g c' hg₁ hc'),
let F₂ := (c.symm ≫ₕ f ≫ₕ c').restr s,
have : F₁ ≈ F₂ := calc
F₁ ≈ c.symm ≫ₕ f₁ ≫ₕ (g ≫ₕ g.symm) ≫ₕ f₂ ≫ₕ c' : by simp [F₁, trans_assoc]
... ≈ c.symm ≫ₕ f₁ ≫ₕ (of_set g.source g.open_source) ≫ₕ f₂ ≫ₕ c' :
by simp [eq_on_source.trans', trans_self_symm g]
... ≈ ((c.symm ≫ₕ f₁) ≫ₕ (of_set g.source g.open_source)) ≫ₕ (f₂ ≫ₕ c') :
by simp [trans_assoc]
... ≈ ((c.symm ≫ₕ f₁).restr s) ≫ₕ (f₂ ≫ₕ c') : by simp [s, trans_of_set']
... ≈ ((c.symm ≫ₕ f₁) ≫ₕ (f₂ ≫ₕ c')).restr s : by simp [restr_trans]
... ≈ (c.symm ≫ₕ (f₁ ≫ₕ f₂) ≫ₕ c').restr s : by simp [eq_on_source.restr, trans_assoc]
... ≈ F₂ : by simp [F₂, feq],
have : F₂ ∈ G := G.eq_on_source A (setoid.symm this),
exact this
end,
..homeomorph.trans e.to_homeomorph e'.to_homeomorph }
end has_groupoid
|
967a6d7915ec29ec5f169ef81d19690e82ac41ee | d450724ba99f5b50b57d244eb41fef9f6789db81 | /src/homework/hw6.lean | 839b629a1694a9a01109412da25c1d06635ee477 | [] | no_license | jakekauff/CS2120F21 | 4f009adeb4ce4a148442b562196d66cc6c04530c | e69529ec6f5d47a554291c4241a3d8ec4fe8f5ad | refs/heads/main | 1,693,841,880,030 | 1,637,604,848,000 | 1,637,604,848,000 | 399,946,698 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,173 | lean | import data.set
/-
Exercise: Prove that for any set, L, L ∩ L = L.
-/
/-
Exercise: Give a formal statement and proof, then an
English language proof, that the union operator on
sets is commutative.
-/
/-
Exercise: Prove that ⊆ is reflexive and transitive.
Give a formal statement, a formal proof, and an English
language (informal) proof of this fact.
-/
/-
Exercise: Prove that ∪ and ∩ are associative.
Give a formal statement, a formal proof, and an
English language (informal) proof of this fact.
-/
/-
Assignment: read (at least skim) the Sections 1 and
2 of the Wikipedia page on set identities:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_set_identities_and_relations
There, , among *many* other facts, you will find definitions
of left and right distributivity. To complete the remainder
of this assignment, you need to understand what it means for
one operator to be left- (or right-) distributive over another.
-/
/-
Exercise: Formally state, and prove both formally and
informally, that ∩ is left-distributive over ∩.
-/
/-
Exercise: Formally state and prove both formally
and informally that ∪ is left-distributive over ∩.
-/
|
1bbb042eaf55d40b098aebccc613ae35a814547c | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/category_theory/over.lean | 43be2fd9d3b2d2cbc96a44fcee9f4d5779fe2651 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,146 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.comma
import category_theory.punit
import category_theory.reflects_isomorphisms
import category_theory.epi_mono
/-!
# Over and under categories
Over (and under) categories are special cases of comma categories.
* If `L` is the identity functor and `R` is a constant functor, then `comma L R` is the "slice" or
"over" category over the object `R` maps to.
* Conversely, if `L` is a constant functor and `R` is the identity functor, then `comma L R` is the
"coslice" or "under" category under the object `L` maps to.
## Tags
comma, slice, coslice, over, under
-/
namespace category_theory
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
variables {T : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} T]
/--
The over category has as objects arrows in `T` with codomain `X` and as morphisms commutative
triangles.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001G.
-/
@[derive category]
def over (X : T) := comma.{v₁ v₁ v₁} (𝟭 T) (functor.from_punit X)
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter
instance over.inhabited [inhabited T] : inhabited (over (default T)) :=
{ default :=
{ left := default T,
hom := 𝟙 _ } }
namespace over
variables {X : T}
@[ext] lemma over_morphism.ext {X : T} {U V : over X} {f g : U ⟶ V}
(h : f.left = g.left) : f = g :=
by tidy
@[simp] lemma over_right (U : over X) : U.right = punit.star := by tidy
@[simp] lemma id_left (U : over X) : comma_morphism.left (𝟙 U) = 𝟙 U.left := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_left (a b c : over X) (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(f ≫ g).left = f.left ≫ g.left := rfl
@[simp, reassoc] lemma w {A B : over X} (f : A ⟶ B) : f.left ≫ B.hom = A.hom :=
by have := f.w; tidy
/-- To give an object in the over category, it suffices to give a morphism with codomain `X`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {X Y : T} (f : Y ⟶ X) : over X :=
{ left := Y, hom := f }
/-- We can set up a coercion from arrows with codomain `X` to `over X`. This most likely should not
be a global instance, but it is sometimes useful. -/
def coe_from_hom {X Y : T} : has_coe (Y ⟶ X) (over X) :=
{ coe := mk }
section
local attribute [instance] coe_from_hom
@[simp] lemma coe_hom {X Y : T} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (f : over X).hom = f := rfl
end
/-- To give a morphism in the over category, it suffices to give an arrow fitting in a commutative
triangle. -/
@[simps]
def hom_mk {U V : over X} (f : U.left ⟶ V.left) (w : f ≫ V.hom = U.hom . obviously) :
U ⟶ V :=
{ left := f }
/--
Construct an isomorphism in the over category given isomorphisms of the objects whose forward
direction gives a commutative triangle.
-/
@[simps]
def iso_mk {f g : over X} (hl : f.left ≅ g.left) (hw : hl.hom ≫ g.hom = f.hom . obviously) :
f ≅ g :=
comma.iso_mk hl (eq_to_iso (subsingleton.elim _ _)) (by simp [hw])
section
variable (X)
/--
The forgetful functor mapping an arrow to its domain.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001G.
-/
def forget : over X ⥤ T := comma.fst _ _
end
@[simp] lemma forget_obj {U : over X} : (forget X).obj U = U.left := rfl
@[simp] lemma forget_map {U V : over X} {f : U ⟶ V} : (forget X).map f = f.left := rfl
/--
A morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `over X ⥤ over Y` in the obvious way.
See https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001G.
-/
def map {Y : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) : over X ⥤ over Y := comma.map_right _ $ discrete.nat_trans (λ _, f)
section
variables {Y : T} {f : X ⟶ Y} {U V : over X} {g : U ⟶ V}
@[simp] lemma map_obj_left : ((map f).obj U).left = U.left := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_obj_hom : ((map f).obj U).hom = U.hom ≫ f := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_map_left : ((map f).map g).left = g.left := rfl
/-- Mapping by the identity morphism is just the identity functor. -/
def map_id : map (𝟙 Y) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by tidy)) (by tidy)
/-- Mapping by the composite morphism `f ≫ g` is the same as mapping by `f` then by `g`. -/
def map_comp {Y Z : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : map (f ≫ g) ≅ map f ⋙ map g :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by tidy)) (by tidy)
end
instance forget_reflects_iso : reflects_isomorphisms (forget X) :=
{ reflects := λ Y Z f t, by exactI
{ inv := over.hom_mk t.inv ((as_iso ((forget X).map f)).inv_comp_eq.2 (over.w f).symm) } }
instance forget_faithful : faithful (forget X) := {}.
/--
If `k.left` is an epimorphism, then `k` is an epimorphism. In other words, `over.forget X` reflects
epimorphisms.
The converse does not hold without additional assumptions on the underlying category.
-/
-- TODO: Show the converse holds if `T` has binary products or pushouts.
lemma epi_of_epi_left {f g : over X} (k : f ⟶ g) [hk : epi k.left] : epi k :=
faithful_reflects_epi (forget X) hk
/--
If `k.left` is a monomorphism, then `k` is a monomorphism. In other words, `over.forget X` reflects
monomorphisms.
The converse of `category_theory.over.mono_left_of_mono`.
This lemma is not an instance, to avoid loops in type class inference.
-/
lemma mono_of_mono_left {f g : over X} (k : f ⟶ g) [hk : mono k.left] : mono k :=
faithful_reflects_mono (forget X) hk
/--
If `k` is a monomorphism, then `k.left` is a monomorphism. In other words, `over.forget X` preserves
monomorphisms.
The converse of `category_theory.over.mono_of_mono_left`.
-/
instance mono_left_of_mono {f g : over X} (k : f ⟶ g) [mono k] : mono k.left :=
begin
refine ⟨λ (Y : T) l m a, _⟩,
let l' : mk (m ≫ f.hom) ⟶ f := hom_mk l (by { dsimp, rw [←over.w k, reassoc_of a] }),
suffices : l' = hom_mk m,
{ apply congr_arg comma_morphism.left this },
rw ← cancel_mono k,
ext,
apply a,
end
section iterated_slice
variables (f : over X)
/-- Given f : Y ⟶ X, this is the obvious functor from (T/X)/f to T/Y -/
@[simps]
def iterated_slice_forward : over f ⥤ over f.left :=
{ obj := λ α, over.mk α.hom.left,
map := λ α β κ, over.hom_mk κ.left.left (by { rw auto_param_eq, rw ← over.w κ, refl }) }
/-- Given f : Y ⟶ X, this is the obvious functor from T/Y to (T/X)/f -/
@[simps]
def iterated_slice_backward : over f.left ⥤ over f :=
{ obj := λ g, mk (hom_mk g.hom : mk (g.hom ≫ f.hom) ⟶ f),
map := λ g h α, hom_mk (hom_mk α.left (w_assoc α f.hom)) (over_morphism.ext (w α)) }
/-- Given f : Y ⟶ X, we have an equivalence between (T/X)/f and T/Y -/
@[simps]
def iterated_slice_equiv : over f ≌ over f.left :=
{ functor := iterated_slice_forward f,
inverse := iterated_slice_backward f,
unit_iso :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ g, over.iso_mk (over.iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by tidy)) (by tidy))
(λ X Y g, by { ext, dsimp, simp }),
counit_iso :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ g, over.iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by tidy))
(λ X Y g, by { ext, dsimp, simp }) }
lemma iterated_slice_forward_forget :
iterated_slice_forward f ⋙ forget f.left = forget f ⋙ forget X :=
rfl
lemma iterated_slice_backward_forget_forget :
iterated_slice_backward f ⋙ forget f ⋙ forget X = forget f.left :=
rfl
end iterated_slice
section
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
/-- A functor `F : T ⥤ D` induces a functor `over X ⥤ over (F.obj X)` in the obvious way. -/
@[simps]
def post (F : T ⥤ D) : over X ⥤ over (F.obj X) :=
{ obj := λ Y, mk $ F.map Y.hom,
map := λ Y₁ Y₂ f,
{ left := F.map f.left,
w' := by tidy; erw [← F.map_comp, w] } }
end
end over
/-- The under category has as objects arrows with domain `X` and as morphisms commutative
triangles. -/
@[derive category]
def under (X : T) := comma.{v₁ v₁ v₁} (functor.from_punit X) (𝟭 T)
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter
instance under.inhabited [inhabited T] : inhabited (under (default T)) :=
{ default :=
{ right := default T,
hom := 𝟙 _ } }
namespace under
variables {X : T}
@[ext] lemma under_morphism.ext {X : T} {U V : under X} {f g : U ⟶ V}
(h : f.right = g.right) : f = g :=
by tidy
@[simp] lemma under_left (U : under X) : U.left = punit.star := by tidy
@[simp] lemma id_right (U : under X) : comma_morphism.right (𝟙 U) = 𝟙 U.right := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_right (a b c : under X) (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(f ≫ g).right = f.right ≫ g.right := rfl
@[simp, reassoc] lemma w {A B : under X} (f : A ⟶ B) : A.hom ≫ f.right = B.hom :=
by have := f.w; tidy
/-- To give an object in the under category, it suffices to give an arrow with domain `X`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {X Y : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) : under X :=
{ right := Y, hom := f }
/-- To give a morphism in the under category, it suffices to give a morphism fitting in a
commutative triangle. -/
@[simps]
def hom_mk {U V : under X} (f : U.right ⟶ V.right) (w : U.hom ≫ f = V.hom . obviously) :
U ⟶ V :=
{ right := f }
/--
Construct an isomorphism in the over category given isomorphisms of the objects whose forward
direction gives a commutative triangle.
-/
def iso_mk {f g : under X} (hr : f.right ≅ g.right) (hw : f.hom ≫ hr.hom = g.hom) : f ≅ g :=
comma.iso_mk (eq_to_iso (subsingleton.elim _ _)) hr (by simp [hw])
@[simp]
lemma iso_mk_hom_right {f g : under X} (hr : f.right ≅ g.right) (hw : f.hom ≫ hr.hom = g.hom) :
(iso_mk hr hw).hom.right = hr.hom := rfl
@[simp]
lemma iso_mk_inv_right {f g : under X} (hr : f.right ≅ g.right) (hw : f.hom ≫ hr.hom = g.hom) :
(iso_mk hr hw).inv.right = hr.inv := rfl
section
variables (X)
/-- The forgetful functor mapping an arrow to its domain. -/
def forget : under X ⥤ T := comma.snd _ _
end
@[simp] lemma forget_obj {U : under X} : (forget X).obj U = U.right := rfl
@[simp] lemma forget_map {U V : under X} {f : U ⟶ V} : (forget X).map f = f.right := rfl
/-- A morphism `X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `under Y ⥤ under X` in the obvious way. -/
def map {Y : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) : under Y ⥤ under X := comma.map_left _ $ discrete.nat_trans (λ _, f)
section
variables {Y : T} {f : X ⟶ Y} {U V : under Y} {g : U ⟶ V}
@[simp] lemma map_obj_right : ((map f).obj U).right = U.right := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_obj_hom : ((map f).obj U).hom = f ≫ U.hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_map_right : ((map f).map g).right = g.right := rfl
/-- Mapping by the identity morphism is just the identity functor. -/
def map_id : map (𝟙 Y) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by tidy)) (by tidy)
/-- Mapping by the composite morphism `f ≫ g` is the same as mapping by `f` then by `g`. -/
def map_comp {Y Z : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : map (f ≫ g) ≅ map g ⋙ map f :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso_mk (iso.refl _) (by tidy)) (by tidy)
end
section
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
/-- A functor `F : T ⥤ D` induces a functor `under X ⥤ under (F.obj X)` in the obvious way. -/
@[simps]
def post {X : T} (F : T ⥤ D) : under X ⥤ under (F.obj X) :=
{ obj := λ Y, mk $ F.map Y.hom,
map := λ Y₁ Y₂ f,
{ right := F.map f.right,
w' := by tidy; erw [← F.map_comp, w] } }
end
end under
end category_theory
|
fcdb7ea7d481d380069feb8540e24b44a0bb0879 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/data/multiset/fintype.lean | 70830824d1bb2a86ea67c676e538696c7a74f888 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,202 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import data.fintype.card
import algebra.big_operators
/-!
# Multiset coercion to type
This module defines a `has_coe_to_sort` instance for multisets and gives it a `fintype` instance.
It also defines `multiset.to_enum_finset`, which is another way to enumerate the elements of
a multiset. These coercions and definitions make it easier to sum over multisets using existing
`finset` theory.
## Main definitions
* A coercion from `m : multiset α` to a `Type*`. For `x : m`, then there is a coercion `↑x : α`,
and `x.2` is a term of `fin (m.count x)`. The second component is what ensures each term appears
with the correct multiplicity. Note that this coercion requires `decidable_eq α` due to
`multiset.count`.
* `multiset.to_enum_finset` is a `finset` version of this.
* `multiset.coe_embedding` is the embedding `m ↪ α × ℕ`, whose first component is the coercion
and whose second component enumerates elements with multiplicity.
* `multiset.coe_equiv` is the equivalence `m ≃ m.to_enum_finset`.
## Tags
multiset enumeration
-/
open_locale big_operators
variables {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] {m : multiset α}
/-- Auxiliary definition for the `has_coe_to_sort` instance. This prevents the `has_coe m α`
instance from inadverently applying to other sigma types. One should not use this definition
directly. -/
@[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def multiset.to_type (m : multiset α) : Type* := Σ (x : α), fin (m.count x)
/-- Create a type that has the same number of elements as the multiset.
Terms of this type are triples `⟨x, ⟨i, h⟩⟩` where `x : α`, `i : ℕ`, and `h : i < m.count x`.
This way repeated elements of a multiset appear multiple times with different values of `i`. -/
instance : has_coe_to_sort (multiset α) Type* := ⟨multiset.to_type⟩
@[simp] lemma multiset.coe_sort_eq : m.to_type = m := rfl
/-- Constructor for terms of the coercion of `m` to a type.
This helps Lean pick up the correct instances. -/
@[reducible, pattern] def multiset.mk_to_type (m : multiset α) (x : α) (i : fin (m.count x)) : m :=
⟨x, i⟩
/-- As a convenience, there is a coercion from `m : Type*` to `α` by projecting onto the first
component. -/
instance multiset.has_coe_to_sort.has_coe : has_coe m α := ⟨λ x, x.1⟩
@[simp] lemma multiset.fst_coe_eq_coe {x : m} : x.1 = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma multiset.coe_eq {x y : m} : (x : α) = (y : α) ↔ x.1 = y.1 :=
by { cases x, cases y, refl }
@[simp] lemma multiset.coe_mk {x : α} {i : fin (m.count x)} : ↑(m.mk_to_type x i) = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma multiset.coe_mem {x : m} : ↑x ∈ m := multiset.count_pos.mp (pos_of_gt x.2.2)
@[simp] protected lemma multiset.forall_coe (p : m → Prop) :
(∀ (x : m), p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (i : fin (m.count x)), p ⟨x, i⟩ := sigma.forall
@[simp] protected lemma multiset.exists_coe (p : m → Prop) :
(∃ (x : m), p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (i : fin (m.count x)), p ⟨x, i⟩ := sigma.exists
instance : fintype {p : α × ℕ | p.2 < m.count p.1} :=
fintype.of_finset
(m.to_finset.bUnion (λ x, (finset.range (m.count x)).map ⟨prod.mk x, prod.mk.inj_left x⟩))
begin
rintro ⟨x, i⟩,
simp only [finset.mem_bUnion, multiset.mem_to_finset, finset.mem_map, finset.mem_range,
function.embedding.coe_fn_mk, prod.mk.inj_iff, exists_prop, exists_eq_right_right,
set.mem_set_of_eq, and_iff_right_iff_imp],
exact λ h, multiset.count_pos.mp (pos_of_gt h),
end
/-- Construct a finset whose elements enumerate the elements of the multiset `m`.
The `ℕ` component is used to differentiate between equal elements: if `x` appears `n` times
then `(x, 0)`, ..., and `(x, n-1)` appear in the `finset`. -/
def multiset.to_enum_finset (m : multiset α) : finset (α × ℕ) :=
{p : α × ℕ | p.2 < m.count p.1}.to_finset
@[simp] lemma multiset.mem_to_enum_finset (m : multiset α) (p : α × ℕ) :
p ∈ m.to_enum_finset ↔ p.2 < m.count p.1 :=
set.mem_to_finset
lemma multiset.mem_of_mem_to_enum_finset {p : α × ℕ} (h : p ∈ m.to_enum_finset) : p.1 ∈ m :=
multiset.count_pos.mp $ pos_of_gt $ (m.mem_to_enum_finset p).mp h
@[mono]
lemma multiset.to_enum_finset_mono {m₁ m₂ : multiset α}
(h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.to_enum_finset ⊆ m₂.to_enum_finset :=
begin
intro p,
simp only [multiset.mem_to_enum_finset],
exact gt_of_ge_of_gt (multiset.le_iff_count.mp h p.1),
end
@[simp] lemma multiset.to_enum_finset_subset_iff {m₁ m₂ : multiset α} :
m₁.to_enum_finset ⊆ m₂.to_enum_finset ↔ m₁ ≤ m₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, multiset.to_enum_finset_mono⟩,
rw multiset.le_iff_count,
intro x,
by_cases hx : x ∈ m₁,
{ apply nat.le_of_pred_lt,
have : (x, m₁.count x - 1) ∈ m₁.to_enum_finset,
{ rw multiset.mem_to_enum_finset,
exact nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt (multiset.count_pos.mpr hx)), },
simpa only [multiset.mem_to_enum_finset] using h this, },
{ simp [hx] },
end
/-- The embedding from a multiset into `α × ℕ` where the second coordinate enumerates repeats.
If you are looking for the function `m → α`, that would be plain `coe`. -/
@[simps]
def multiset.coe_embedding (m : multiset α) :
m ↪ α × ℕ :=
{ to_fun := λ x, (x, x.2),
inj' := begin
rintro ⟨x, i, hi⟩ ⟨y, j, hj⟩,
simp only [prod.mk.inj_iff, sigma.mk.inj_iff, and_imp, multiset.coe_eq, fin.coe_mk],
rintro rfl rfl,
exact ⟨rfl, heq.rfl⟩
end }
/-- Another way to coerce a `multiset` to a type is to go through `m.to_enum_finset` and coerce
that `finset` to a type. -/
@[simps]
def multiset.coe_equiv (m : multiset α) :
m ≃ m.to_enum_finset :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨m.coe_embedding x, by { rw multiset.mem_to_enum_finset, exact x.2.2 }⟩,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, by { rw ← multiset.mem_to_enum_finset, exact x.2 }⟩,
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨x, i, h⟩, refl },
right_inv := by {rintro ⟨⟨x, i⟩, h⟩, refl } }
@[simp] lemma multiset.to_embedding_coe_equiv_trans (m : multiset α) :
m.coe_equiv.to_embedding.trans (function.embedding.subtype _) = m.coe_embedding :=
by ext; simp
instance multiset.fintype_coe : fintype m :=
fintype.of_equiv m.to_enum_finset m.coe_equiv.symm
lemma multiset.map_univ_coe_embedding (m : multiset α) :
(finset.univ : finset m).map m.coe_embedding = m.to_enum_finset :=
by { ext ⟨x, i⟩, simp only [fin.exists_iff, finset.mem_map, finset.mem_univ,
multiset.coe_embedding_apply, prod.mk.inj_iff, exists_true_left, multiset.exists_coe,
multiset.coe_mk, fin.coe_mk, exists_prop, exists_eq_right_right, exists_eq_right,
multiset.mem_to_enum_finset, iff_self, true_and] }
lemma multiset.to_enum_finset_filter_eq (m : multiset α) (x : α) :
m.to_enum_finset.filter (λ p, x = p.1) =
(finset.range (m.count x)).map ⟨prod.mk x, prod.mk.inj_left x⟩ :=
begin
ext ⟨y, i⟩,
simp only [eq_comm, finset.mem_filter, multiset.mem_to_enum_finset, finset.mem_map,
finset.mem_range, function.embedding.coe_fn_mk, prod.mk.inj_iff, exists_prop,
exists_eq_right_right', and.congr_left_iff],
rintro rfl,
refl,
end
@[simp] lemma multiset.map_to_enum_finset_fst (m : multiset α) :
m.to_enum_finset.val.map prod.fst = m :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [multiset.count_map, ← finset.filter_val, multiset.to_enum_finset_filter_eq,
finset.map_val, finset.range_coe, multiset.card_map, multiset.card_range],
end
@[simp] lemma multiset.image_to_enum_finset_fst (m : multiset α) :
m.to_enum_finset.image prod.fst = m.to_finset :=
by rw [finset.image, multiset.map_to_enum_finset_fst]
@[simp] lemma multiset.map_univ_coe (m : multiset α) :
(finset.univ : finset m).val.map coe = m :=
begin
have := m.map_to_enum_finset_fst,
rw ← m.map_univ_coe_embedding at this,
simpa only [finset.map_val, multiset.coe_embedding_apply, multiset.map_map, function.comp_app]
using this,
end
@[simp] lemma multiset.map_univ {β : Type*} (m : multiset α) (f : α → β) :
(finset.univ : finset m).val.map (λ x, f x) = m.map f :=
by rw [← multiset.map_map, multiset.map_univ_coe]
@[simp] lemma multiset.card_to_enum_finset (m : multiset α) : m.to_enum_finset.card = m.card :=
begin
change multiset.card _ = _,
convert_to (m.to_enum_finset.val.map prod.fst).card = _,
{ rw multiset.card_map },
{ rw m.map_to_enum_finset_fst }
end
@[simp] lemma multiset.card_coe (m : multiset α) : fintype.card m = m.card :=
by { rw fintype.card_congr m.coe_equiv, simp }
@[to_additive]
lemma multiset.prod_eq_prod_coe [comm_monoid α] (m : multiset α) : m.prod = ∏ (x : m), x :=
by { congr, simp }
@[to_additive]
lemma multiset.prod_eq_prod_to_enum_finset [comm_monoid α] (m : multiset α) :
m.prod = ∏ x in m.to_enum_finset, x.1 :=
by { congr, simp }
@[to_additive]
lemma multiset.prod_to_enum_finset {β : Type*} [comm_monoid β] (m : multiset α) (f : α → ℕ → β) :
∏ x in m.to_enum_finset, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ (x : m), f x x.2 :=
begin
rw fintype.prod_equiv m.coe_equiv (λ x, f x x.2) (λ x, f x.1.1 x.1.2),
{ rw ← m.to_enum_finset.prod_coe_sort (λ x, f x.1 x.2),
simp, },
{ simp }
end
|
b5bcb7390d84ab6899d68d43f62b368dd48dda07 | 4bcaca5dc83d49803f72b7b5920b75b6e7d9de2d | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/App.lean | 77bd4346dbc6f7adb04339afc5f670dd654f7f25 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | subfish-zhou/leanprover-zh_CN.github.io | 30b9fba9bd790720bd95764e61ae796697d2f603 | 8b2985d4a3d458ceda9361ac454c28168d920d3f | refs/heads/master | 1,689,709,967,820 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 409,962,097 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 43,965 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Util.FindMVar
import Lean.Parser.Term
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.Binders
import Lean.Elab.SyntheticMVars
import Lean.Elab.Arg
namespace Lean.Elab.Term
open Meta
builtin_initialize elabWithoutExpectedTypeAttr : TagAttribute ←
registerTagAttribute `elabWithoutExpectedType "mark that applications of the given declaration should be elaborated without the expected type"
def hasElabWithoutExpectedType (env : Environment) (declName : Name) : Bool :=
elabWithoutExpectedTypeAttr.hasTag env declName
instance : ToString Arg := ⟨fun
| Arg.stx val => toString val
| Arg.expr val => toString val⟩
instance : ToString NamedArg where
toString s := "(" ++ toString s.name ++ " := " ++ toString s.val ++ ")"
def throwInvalidNamedArg {α} (namedArg : NamedArg) (fn? : Option Name) : TermElabM α :=
withRef namedArg.ref <| match fn? with
| some fn => throwError "invalid argument name '{namedArg.name}' for function '{fn}'"
| none => throwError "invalid argument name '{namedArg.name}' for function"
private def ensureArgType (f : Expr) (arg : Expr) (expectedType : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let argType ← inferType arg
ensureHasTypeAux expectedType argType arg f
/-
Relevant definitions:
```
class CoeFun (α : Sort u) (γ : α → outParam (Sort v))
abbrev coeFun {α : Sort u} {γ : α → Sort v} (a : α) [CoeFun α γ] : γ a
```
-/
private def tryCoeFun? (α : Expr) (a : Expr) : TermElabM (Option Expr) := do
let v ← mkFreshLevelMVar
let type ← mkArrow α (mkSort v)
let γ ← mkFreshExprMVar type
let u ← getLevel α
let coeFunInstType := mkAppN (Lean.mkConst ``CoeFun [u, v]) #[α, γ]
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar coeFunInstType MetavarKind.synthetic
let mvarId := mvar.mvarId!
try
if (← synthesizeCoeInstMVarCore mvarId) then
expandCoe <| mkAppN (Lean.mkConst ``coeFun [u, v]) #[α, γ, a, mvar]
else
return none
catch _ =>
return none
def synthesizeAppInstMVars (instMVars : Array MVarId) (app : Expr) : TermElabM Unit :=
for mvarId in instMVars do
unless (← synthesizeInstMVarCore mvarId) do
registerSyntheticMVarWithCurrRef mvarId SyntheticMVarKind.typeClass
registerMVarErrorImplicitArgInfo mvarId (← getRef) app
namespace ElabAppArgs
/- Auxiliary structure for elaborating the application `f args namedArgs`. -/
structure State where
explicit : Bool -- true if `@` modifier was used
f : Expr
fType : Expr
args : List Arg -- remaining regular arguments
namedArgs : List NamedArg -- remaining named arguments to be processed
ellipsis : Bool := false
expectedType? : Option Expr
etaArgs : Array Expr := #[]
toSetErrorCtx : Array MVarId := #[] -- metavariables that we need the set the error context using the application being built
instMVars : Array MVarId := #[] -- metavariables for the instance implicit arguments that have already been processed
-- The following field is used to implement the `propagateExpectedType` heuristic.
propagateExpected : Bool -- true when expectedType has not been propagated yet
abbrev M := StateRefT State TermElabM
/- Add the given metavariable to the collection of metavariables associated with instance-implicit arguments. -/
private def addInstMVar (mvarId : MVarId) : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with instMVars := s.instMVars.push mvarId }
/-
Try to synthesize metavariables are `instMVars` using type class resolution.
The ones that cannot be synthesized yet are registered.
Remark: we use this method before trying to apply coercions to function. -/
def synthesizeAppInstMVars : M Unit := do
let s ← get
let instMVars := s.instMVars
modify fun s => { s with instMVars := #[] }
Lean.Elab.Term.synthesizeAppInstMVars instMVars s.f
/- fType may become a forallE after we synthesize pending metavariables. -/
private def synthesizePendingAndNormalizeFunType : M Unit := do
synthesizeAppInstMVars
synthesizeSyntheticMVars
let s ← get
let fType ← whnfForall s.fType
if fType.isForall then
modify fun s => { s with fType := fType }
else
match (← tryCoeFun? fType s.f) with
| some f =>
let fType ← inferType f
modify fun s => { s with f := f, fType := fType }
| none =>
for namedArg in s.namedArgs do
let f := s.f.getAppFn
if f.isConst then
throwInvalidNamedArg namedArg f.constName!
else
throwInvalidNamedArg namedArg none
throwError "function expected at{indentExpr s.f}\nterm has type{indentExpr fType}"
/- Normalize and return the function type. -/
private def normalizeFunType : M Expr := do
let s ← get
let fType ← whnfForall s.fType
modify fun s => { s with fType := fType }
pure fType
/- Return the binder name at `fType`. This method assumes `fType` is a function type. -/
private def getBindingName : M Name := return (← get).fType.bindingName!
/- Return the next argument expected type. This method assumes `fType` is a function type. -/
private def getArgExpectedType : M Expr := return (← get).fType.bindingDomain!
def eraseNamedArgCore (namedArgs : List NamedArg) (binderName : Name) : List NamedArg :=
namedArgs.filter (·.name != binderName)
/- Remove named argument with name `binderName` from `namedArgs`. -/
def eraseNamedArg (binderName : Name) : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with namedArgs := eraseNamedArgCore s.namedArgs binderName }
/-
Add a new argument to the result. That is, `f := f arg`, update `fType`.
This method assumes `fType` is a function type. -/
private def addNewArg (arg : Expr) : M Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with f := mkApp s.f arg, fType := s.fType.bindingBody!.instantiate1 arg }
/-
Elaborate the given `Arg` and add it to the result. See `addNewArg`.
Recall that, `Arg` may be wrapping an already elaborated `Expr`. -/
private def elabAndAddNewArg (arg : Arg) : M Unit := do
let s ← get
let expectedType ← getArgExpectedType
match arg with
| Arg.expr val =>
let arg ← ensureArgType s.f val expectedType
addNewArg arg
| Arg.stx val =>
let val ← elabTerm val expectedType
let arg ← ensureArgType s.f val expectedType
addNewArg arg
/- Return true if the given type contains `OptParam` or `AutoParams` -/
private def hasOptAutoParams (type : Expr) : M Bool := do
forallTelescopeReducing type fun xs type =>
xs.anyM fun x => do
let xType ← inferType x
return xType.getOptParamDefault?.isSome || xType.getAutoParamTactic?.isSome
/- Return true if `fType` contains `OptParam` or `AutoParams` -/
private def fTypeHasOptAutoParams : M Bool := do
hasOptAutoParams (← get).fType
/- Auxiliary function for retrieving the resulting type of a function application.
See `propagateExpectedType`.
Remark: `(explicit : Bool) == true` when `@` modifier is used. -/
private partial def getForallBody (explicit : Bool) : Nat → List NamedArg → Expr → Option Expr
| i, namedArgs, type@(Expr.forallE n d b c) =>
match namedArgs.find? fun (namedArg : NamedArg) => namedArg.name == n with
| some _ => getForallBody explicit i (eraseNamedArgCore namedArgs n) b
| none =>
if !explicit && !c.binderInfo.isExplicit then
getForallBody explicit i namedArgs b
else if i > 0 then
getForallBody explicit (i-1) namedArgs b
else if d.isAutoParam || d.isOptParam then
getForallBody explicit i namedArgs b
else
some type
| 0, [], type => some type
| _, _, _ => none
private def shouldPropagateExpectedTypeFor (nextArg : Arg) : Bool :=
match nextArg with
| Arg.expr _ => false -- it has already been elaborated
| Arg.stx stx =>
-- TODO: make this configurable?
stx.getKind != ``Lean.Parser.Term.hole &&
stx.getKind != ``Lean.Parser.Term.syntheticHole &&
stx.getKind != ``Lean.Parser.Term.byTactic
/-
Auxiliary method for propagating the expected type. We call it as soon as we find the first explict
argument. The goal is to propagate the expected type in applications of functions such as
```lean
Add.add {α : Type u} : α → α → α
List.cons {α : Type u} : α → List α → List α
```
This is particularly useful when there applicable coercions. For example,
assume we have a coercion from `Nat` to `Int`, and we have
`(x : Nat)` and the expected type is `List Int`. Then, if we don't use this function,
the elaborator will fail to elaborate
```
List.cons x []
```
First, the elaborator creates a new metavariable `?α` for the implicit argument `{α : Type u}`.
Then, when it processes `x`, it assigns `?α := Nat`, and then obtain the
resultant type `List Nat` which is **not** definitionally equal to `List Int`.
We solve the problem by executing this method before we elaborate the first explicit argument (`x` in this example).
This method infers that the resultant type is `List ?α` and unifies it with `List Int`.
Then, when we elaborate `x`, the elaborate realizes the coercion from `Nat` to `Int` must be used, and the
term
```
@List.cons Int (coe x) (@List.nil Int)
```
is produced.
The method will do nothing if
1- The resultant type depends on the remaining arguments (i.e., `!eTypeBody.hasLooseBVars`).
2- The resultant type contains optional/auto params.
We have considered adding the following extra conditions
a) The resultant type does not contain any type metavariable.
b) The resultant type contains a nontype metavariable.
These two conditions would restrict the method to simple functions that are "morally" in
the Hindley&Milner fragment.
If users need to disable expected type propagation, we can add an attribute `[elabWithoutExpectedType]`.
-/
private def propagateExpectedType (arg : Arg) : M Unit := do
if shouldPropagateExpectedTypeFor arg then
let s ← get
-- TODO: handle s.etaArgs.size > 0
unless !s.etaArgs.isEmpty || !s.propagateExpected do
match s.expectedType? with
| none => pure ()
| some expectedType =>
/- We don't propagate `Prop` because we often use `Prop` as a more general "Bool" (e.g., `if-then-else`).
If we propagate `expectedType == Prop` in the following examples, the elaborator would fail
```
def f1 (s : Nat × Bool) : Bool := if s.2 then false else true
def f2 (s : List Bool) : Bool := if s.head! then false else true
def f3 (s : List Bool) : Bool := if List.head! (s.map not) then false else true
```
They would all fail for the same reason. So, let's focus on the first one.
We would elaborate `s.2` with `expectedType == Prop`.
Before we elaborate `s`, this method would be invoked, and `s.fType` is `?α × ?β → ?β` and after
propagation we would have `?α × Prop → Prop`. Then, when we would try to elaborate `s`, and
get a type error because `?α × Prop` cannot be unified with `Nat × Bool`
Most users would have a hard time trying to understand why these examples failed.
Here is a possible alternative workarounds. We give up the idea of using `Prop` at `if-then-else`.
Drawback: users use `if-then-else` with conditions that are not Decidable.
So, users would have to embrace `propDecidable` and `choice`.
This may not be that bad since the developers and users don't seem to care about constructivism.
We currently use a different workaround, we just don't propagate the expected type when it is `Prop`. -/
if expectedType.isProp then
modify fun s => { s with propagateExpected := false }
else
let numRemainingArgs := s.args.length
trace[Elab.app.propagateExpectedType] "etaArgs.size: {s.etaArgs.size}, numRemainingArgs: {numRemainingArgs}, fType: {s.fType}"
match getForallBody s.explicit numRemainingArgs s.namedArgs s.fType with
| none => pure ()
| some fTypeBody =>
unless fTypeBody.hasLooseBVars do
unless (← hasOptAutoParams fTypeBody) do
trace[Elab.app.propagateExpectedType] "{expectedType} =?= {fTypeBody}"
if (← isDefEq expectedType fTypeBody) then
/- Note that we only set `propagateExpected := false` when propagation has succeeded. -/
modify fun s => { s with propagateExpected := false }
/- This method execute after all application arguments have been processed. -/
private def finalize : M Expr := do
let s ← get
let mut e := s.f
-- all user explicit arguments have been consumed
trace[Elab.app.finalize] e
let ref ← getRef
-- Register the error context of implicits
for mvarId in s.toSetErrorCtx do
registerMVarErrorImplicitArgInfo mvarId ref e
if !s.etaArgs.isEmpty then
e ← mkLambdaFVars s.etaArgs e
/-
Remark: we should not use `s.fType` as `eType` even when
`s.etaArgs.isEmpty`. Reason: it may have been unfolded.
-/
let eType ← inferType e
trace[Elab.app.finalize] "after etaArgs, {e} : {eType}"
match s.expectedType? with
| none => pure ()
| some expectedType =>
trace[Elab.app.finalize] "expected type: {expectedType}"
-- Try to propagate expected type. Ignore if types are not definitionally equal, caller must handle it.
discard <| isDefEq expectedType eType
synthesizeAppInstMVars
pure e
/- Return true if there is a named argument that depends on the next argument. -/
private def anyNamedArgDependsOnCurrent : M Bool := do
let s ← get
if s.namedArgs.isEmpty then
return false
else
forallTelescopeReducing s.fType fun xs _ => do
let curr := xs[0]
for i in [1:xs.size] do
let xDecl ← getLocalDecl xs[i].fvarId!
if s.namedArgs.any fun arg => arg.name == xDecl.userName then
if (← getMCtx).localDeclDependsOn xDecl curr.fvarId! then
return true
return false
/- Return true if there are regular or named arguments to be processed. -/
private def hasArgsToProcess : M Bool := do
let s ← get
return !s.args.isEmpty || !s.namedArgs.isEmpty
/- Return true if the next argument at `args` is of the form `_` -/
private def isNextArgHole : M Bool := do
match (← get).args with
| Arg.stx (Syntax.node ``Lean.Parser.Term.hole _) :: _ => pure true
| _ => pure false
mutual
/-
Create a fresh local variable with the current binder name and argument type, add it to `etaArgs` and `f`,
and then execute the main loop.-/
private partial def addEtaArg : M Expr := do
let n ← getBindingName
let type ← getArgExpectedType
withLocalDeclD n type fun x => do
modify fun s => { s with etaArgs := s.etaArgs.push x }
addNewArg x
main
private partial def addImplicitArg : M Expr := do
let argType ← getArgExpectedType
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar argType
modify fun s => { s with toSetErrorCtx := s.toSetErrorCtx.push arg.mvarId! }
addNewArg arg
main
/-
Process a `fType` of the form `(x : A) → B x`.
This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
private partial def processExplictArg : M Expr := do
let s ← get
match s.args with
| arg::args =>
propagateExpectedType arg
modify fun s => { s with args := args }
elabAndAddNewArg arg
main
| _ =>
let argType ← getArgExpectedType
match s.explicit, argType.getOptParamDefault?, argType.getAutoParamTactic? with
| false, some defVal, _ => addNewArg defVal; main
| false, _, some (Expr.const tacticDecl _ _) =>
let env ← getEnv
let opts ← getOptions
match evalSyntaxConstant env opts tacticDecl with
| Except.error err => throwError err
| Except.ok tacticSyntax =>
-- TODO(Leo): does this work correctly for tactic sequences?
let tacticBlock ← `(by $tacticSyntax)
let argType := argType.getArg! 0 -- `autoParam type := by tactic` ==> `type`
let argNew := Arg.stx tacticBlock
propagateExpectedType argNew
elabAndAddNewArg argNew
main
| false, _, some _ =>
throwError "invalid autoParam, argument must be a constant"
| _, _, _ =>
if !s.namedArgs.isEmpty then
if (← anyNamedArgDependsOnCurrent) then
addImplicitArg
else
addEtaArg
else if !s.explicit then
if (← fTypeHasOptAutoParams) then
addEtaArg
else if (← get).ellipsis then
addImplicitArg
else
finalize
else
finalize
/-
Process a `fType` of the form `{x : A} → B x`.
This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
private partial def processImplicitArg : M Expr := do
if (← get).explicit then
processExplictArg
else
addImplicitArg
/-
Process a `fType` of the form `{{x : A}} → B x`.
This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
private partial def processStrictImplicitArg : M Expr := do
if (← get).explicit then
processExplictArg
else if (← hasArgsToProcess) then
addImplicitArg
else
finalize
/-
Process a `fType` of the form `[x : A] → B x`.
This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
private partial def processInstImplicitArg : M Expr := do
if (← get).explicit then
if (← isNextArgHole) then
/- Recall that if '@' has been used, and the argument is '_', then we still use type class resolution -/
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType) MetavarKind.synthetic
modify fun s => { s with args := s.args.tail! }
addInstMVar arg.mvarId!
addNewArg arg
main
else
processExplictArg
else
let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType) MetavarKind.synthetic
addInstMVar arg.mvarId!
addNewArg arg
main
/- Elaborate function application arguments. -/
partial def main : M Expr := do
let s ← get
let fType ← normalizeFunType
if fType.isForall then
let binderName := fType.bindingName!
let binfo := fType.bindingInfo!
let s ← get
match s.namedArgs.find? fun (namedArg : NamedArg) => namedArg.name == binderName with
| some namedArg =>
propagateExpectedType namedArg.val
eraseNamedArg binderName
elabAndAddNewArg namedArg.val
main
| none =>
match binfo with
| BinderInfo.implicit => processImplicitArg
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => processInstImplicitArg
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => processStrictImplicitArg
| _ => processExplictArg
else if (← hasArgsToProcess) then
synthesizePendingAndNormalizeFunType
main
else
finalize
end
end ElabAppArgs
private def propagateExpectedTypeFor (f : Expr) : TermElabM Bool :=
match f.getAppFn.constName? with
| some declName => return !hasElabWithoutExpectedType (← getEnv) declName
| _ => return true
def elabAppArgs (f : Expr) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg)
(expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis : Bool) : TermElabM Expr := do
let fType ← inferType f
let fType ← instantiateMVars fType
trace[Elab.app.args] "explicit: {explicit}, {f} : {fType}"
unless namedArgs.isEmpty && args.isEmpty do
tryPostponeIfMVar fType
ElabAppArgs.main.run' {
args := args.toList,
expectedType? := expectedType?,
explicit := explicit,
ellipsis := ellipsis,
namedArgs := namedArgs.toList,
f := f,
fType := fType
propagateExpected := (← propagateExpectedTypeFor f)
}
/-- Auxiliary inductive datatype that represents the resolution of an `LVal`. -/
inductive LValResolution where
| projFn (baseStructName : Name) (structName : Name) (fieldName : Name)
| projIdx (structName : Name) (idx : Nat)
| const (baseStructName : Name) (structName : Name) (constName : Name)
| localRec (baseName : Name) (fullName : Name) (fvar : Expr)
| getOp (fullName : Name) (idx : Syntax)
private def throwLValError {α} (e : Expr) (eType : Expr) (msg : MessageData) : TermElabM α :=
throwError "{msg}{indentExpr e}\nhas type{indentExpr eType}"
/-- `findMethod? env S fName`.
1- If `env` contains `S ++ fName`, return `(S, S++fName)`
2- Otherwise if `env` contains private name `prv` for `S ++ fName`, return `(S, prv)`, o
3- Otherwise for each parent structure `S'` of `S`, we try `findMethod? env S' fname` -/
private partial def findMethod? (env : Environment) (structName fieldName : Name) : Option (Name × Name) :=
let fullName := structName ++ fieldName
match env.find? fullName with
| some _ => some (structName, fullName)
| none =>
let fullNamePrv := mkPrivateName env fullName
match env.find? fullNamePrv with
| some _ => some (structName, fullNamePrv)
| none =>
if isStructure env structName then
(getParentStructures env structName).findSome? fun parentStructName => findMethod? env parentStructName fieldName
else
none
private def resolveLValAux (e : Expr) (eType : Expr) (lval : LVal) : TermElabM LValResolution := do
match eType.getAppFn.constName?, lval with
| some structName, LVal.fieldIdx _ idx =>
if idx == 0 then
throwError "invalid projection, index must be greater than 0"
let env ← getEnv
unless isStructureLike env structName do
throwLValError e eType "invalid projection, structure expected"
let numFields := getStructureLikeNumFields env structName
if idx - 1 < numFields then
if isStructure env structName then
let fieldNames := getStructureFields env structName
return LValResolution.projFn structName structName fieldNames[idx - 1]
else
/- `structName` was declared using `inductive` command.
So, we don't projection functions for it. Thus, we use `Expr.proj` -/
return LValResolution.projIdx structName (idx - 1)
else
throwLValError e eType m!"invalid projection, structure has only {numFields} field(s)"
| some structName, LVal.fieldName _ fieldName _ _ =>
let env ← getEnv
let searchEnv : Unit → TermElabM LValResolution := fun _ => do
match findMethod? env structName (Name.mkSimple fieldName) with
| some (baseStructName, fullName) => pure $ LValResolution.const baseStructName structName fullName
| none =>
throwLValError e eType
m!"invalid field '{fieldName}', the environment does not contain '{Name.mkStr structName fieldName}'"
-- search local context first, then environment
let searchCtx : Unit → TermElabM LValResolution := fun _ => do
let fullName := Name.mkStr structName fieldName
let currNamespace ← getCurrNamespace
let localName := fullName.replacePrefix currNamespace Name.anonymous
let lctx ← getLCtx
match lctx.findFromUserName? localName with
| some localDecl =>
if localDecl.binderInfo == BinderInfo.auxDecl then
/- LVal notation is being used to make a "local" recursive call. -/
pure $ LValResolution.localRec structName fullName localDecl.toExpr
else
searchEnv ()
| none => searchEnv ()
if isStructure env structName then
match findField? env structName (Name.mkSimple fieldName) with
| some baseStructName => pure $ LValResolution.projFn baseStructName structName (Name.mkSimple fieldName)
| none => searchCtx ()
else
searchCtx ()
| some structName, LVal.getOp _ idx =>
let env ← getEnv
let fullName := Name.mkStr structName "getOp"
match env.find? fullName with
| some _ => pure $ LValResolution.getOp fullName idx
| none => throwLValError e eType m!"invalid [..] notation because environment does not contain '{fullName}'"
| none, LVal.fieldName _ _ (some suffix) _ =>
if e.isConst then
throwUnknownConstant (e.constName! ++ suffix)
else
throwLValError e eType "invalid field notation, type is not of the form (C ...) where C is a constant"
| _, LVal.getOp _ idx =>
throwLValError e eType "invalid [..] notation, type is not of the form (C ...) where C is a constant"
| _, _ =>
throwLValError e eType "invalid field notation, type is not of the form (C ...) where C is a constant"
/- whnfCore + implicit consumption.
Example: given `e` with `eType := {α : Type} → (fun β => List β) α `, it produces `(e ?m, List ?m)` where `?m` is fresh metavariable. -/
private partial def consumeImplicits (stx : Syntax) (e eType : Expr) (hasArgs : Bool) : TermElabM (Expr × Expr) := do
let eType ← whnfCore eType
match eType with
| Expr.forallE n d b c =>
if c.binderInfo.isImplicit || (hasArgs && c.binderInfo.isStrictImplicit) then
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar d
registerMVarErrorHoleInfo mvar.mvarId! stx
consumeImplicits stx (mkApp e mvar) (b.instantiate1 mvar) hasArgs
else if c.binderInfo.isInstImplicit then
let mvar ← mkInstMVar d
let r := mkApp e mvar
registerMVarErrorImplicitArgInfo mvar.mvarId! stx r
consumeImplicits stx r (b.instantiate1 mvar) hasArgs
else match d.getOptParamDefault? with
| some defVal => consumeImplicits stx (mkApp e defVal) (b.instantiate1 defVal) hasArgs
-- TODO: we do not handle autoParams here.
| _ => pure (e, eType)
| _ => pure (e, eType)
private partial def resolveLValLoop (lval : LVal) (e eType : Expr) (previousExceptions : Array Exception) (hasArgs : Bool) : TermElabM (Expr × LValResolution) := do
let (e, eType) ← consumeImplicits lval.getRef e eType hasArgs
tryPostponeIfMVar eType
try
let lvalRes ← resolveLValAux e eType lval
pure (e, lvalRes)
catch
| ex@(Exception.error _ _) =>
let eType? ← unfoldDefinition? eType
match eType? with
| some eType => resolveLValLoop lval e eType (previousExceptions.push ex) hasArgs
| none =>
previousExceptions.forM fun ex => logException ex
throw ex
| ex@(Exception.internal _ _) => throw ex
private def resolveLVal (e : Expr) (lval : LVal) (hasArgs : Bool) : TermElabM (Expr × LValResolution) := do
let eType ← inferType e
resolveLValLoop lval e eType #[] hasArgs
private partial def mkBaseProjections (baseStructName : Name) (structName : Name) (e : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let env ← getEnv
match getPathToBaseStructure? env baseStructName structName with
| none => throwError "failed to access field in parent structure"
| some path =>
let mut e := e
for projFunName in path do
let projFn ← mkConst projFunName
e ← elabAppArgs projFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr e }] (args := #[]) (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
return e
/- Auxiliary method for field notation. It tries to add `e` as a new argument to `args` or `namedArgs`.
This method first finds the parameter with a type of the form `(baseName ...)`.
When the parameter is found, if it an explicit one and `args` is big enough, we add `e` to `args`.
Otherwise, if there isn't another parameter with the same name, we add `e` to `namedArgs`.
Remark: `fullName` is the name of the resolved "field" access function. It is used for reporting errors -/
private def addLValArg (baseName : Name) (fullName : Name) (e : Expr) (args : Array Arg) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (fType : Expr)
: TermElabM (Array Arg × Array NamedArg) :=
forallTelescopeReducing fType fun xs _ => do
let mut argIdx := 0 -- position of the next explicit argument
let mut remainingNamedArgs := namedArgs
for i in [:xs.size] do
let x := xs[i]
let xDecl ← getLocalDecl x.fvarId!
/- If there is named argument with name `xDecl.userName`, then we skip it. -/
match remainingNamedArgs.findIdx? (fun namedArg => namedArg.name == xDecl.userName) with
| some idx =>
remainingNamedArgs := remainingNamedArgs.eraseIdx idx
| none =>
let mut foundIt := false
let type := xDecl.type
if type.consumeMData.isAppOf baseName then
foundIt := true
if !foundIt then
/- Normalize type and try again -/
let type ← withReducible $ whnf type
if type.consumeMData.isAppOf baseName then
foundIt := true
if foundIt then
/- We found a type of the form (baseName ...).
First, we check if the current argument is an explicit one,
and the current explicit position "fits" at `args` (i.e., it must be ≤ arg.size) -/
if argIdx ≤ args.size && xDecl.binderInfo.isExplicit then
/- We insert `e` as an explicit argument -/
return (args.insertAt argIdx (Arg.expr e), namedArgs)
/- If we can't add `e` to `args`, we try to add it using a named argument, but this is only possible
if there isn't an argument with the same name occurring before it. -/
for j in [:i] do
let prev := xs[j]
let prevDecl ← getLocalDecl prev.fvarId!
if prevDecl.userName == xDecl.userName then
throwError "invalid field notation, function '{fullName}' has argument with the expected type{indentExpr type}\nbut it cannot be used"
return (args, namedArgs.push { name := xDecl.userName, val := Arg.expr e })
if xDecl.binderInfo.isExplicit then
-- advance explicit argument position
argIdx := argIdx + 1
throwError "invalid field notation, function '{fullName}' does not have argument with type ({baseName} ...) that can be used, it must be explicit or implicit with an unique name"
private def elabAppLValsAux (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis : Bool)
(f : Expr) (lvals : List LVal) : TermElabM Expr :=
let rec loop : Expr → List LVal → TermElabM Expr
| f, [] => elabAppArgs f namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
| f, lval::lvals => do
if let LVal.fieldName (ref := fieldStx) (targetStx := targetStx) .. := lval then
addDotCompletionInfo targetStx f expectedType? fieldStx
let hasArgs := !namedArgs.isEmpty || !args.isEmpty
let (f, lvalRes) ← resolveLVal f lval hasArgs
match lvalRes with
| LValResolution.projIdx structName idx =>
let f := mkProj structName idx f
addTermInfo lval.getRef f
loop f lvals
| LValResolution.projFn baseStructName structName fieldName =>
let f ← mkBaseProjections baseStructName structName f
if let some info := getFieldInfo? (← getEnv) baseStructName fieldName then
if isPrivateNameFromImportedModule (← getEnv) info.projFn then
throwError "field '{fieldName}' from structure '{structName}' is private"
let projFn ← mkConst info.projFn
addTermInfo lval.getRef projFn
if lvals.isEmpty then
let namedArgs ← addNamedArg namedArgs { name := `self, val := Arg.expr f }
elabAppArgs projFn namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
else
let f ← elabAppArgs projFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr f }] #[] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
loop f lvals
else
unreachable!
| LValResolution.const baseStructName structName constName =>
let f ← if baseStructName != structName then mkBaseProjections baseStructName structName f else pure f
let projFn ← mkConst constName
addTermInfo lval.getRef projFn
if lvals.isEmpty then
let projFnType ← inferType projFn
let (args, namedArgs) ← addLValArg baseStructName constName f args namedArgs projFnType
elabAppArgs projFn namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
else
let f ← elabAppArgs projFn #[] #[Arg.expr f] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
loop f lvals
| LValResolution.localRec baseName fullName fvar =>
addTermInfo lval.getRef fvar
if lvals.isEmpty then
let fvarType ← inferType fvar
let (args, namedArgs) ← addLValArg baseName fullName f args namedArgs fvarType
elabAppArgs fvar namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
else
let f ← elabAppArgs fvar #[] #[Arg.expr f] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
loop f lvals
| LValResolution.getOp fullName idx =>
let getOpFn ← mkConst fullName
addTermInfo lval.getRef getOpFn
if lvals.isEmpty then
let namedArgs ← addNamedArg namedArgs { name := `self, val := Arg.expr f }
let namedArgs ← addNamedArg namedArgs { name := `idx, val := Arg.stx idx }
elabAppArgs getOpFn namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
else
let f ← elabAppArgs getOpFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr f }, { name := `idx, val := Arg.stx idx }]
#[] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
loop f lvals
loop f lvals
private def elabAppLVals (f : Expr) (lvals : List LVal) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg)
(expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis : Bool) : TermElabM Expr := do
if !lvals.isEmpty && explicit then
throwError "invalid use of field notation with `@` modifier"
elabAppLValsAux namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis f lvals
def elabExplicitUnivs (lvls : Array Syntax) : TermElabM (List Level) := do
lvls.foldrM (fun stx lvls => do pure ((← elabLevel stx)::lvls)) []
/-
Interaction between `errToSorry` and `observing`.
- The method `elabTerm` catches exceptions, log them, and returns a synthetic sorry (IF `ctx.errToSorry` == true).
- When we elaborate choice nodes (and overloaded identifiers), we track multiple results using the `observing x` combinator.
The `observing x` executes `x` and returns a `TermElabResult`.
`observing `x does not check for synthetic sorry's, just an exception. Thus, it may think `x` worked when it didn't
if a synthetic sorry was introduced. We decided that checking for synthetic sorrys at `observing` is not a good solution
because it would not be clear to decide what the "main" error message for the alternative is. When the result contains
a synthetic `sorry`, it is not clear which error message corresponds to the `sorry`. Moreover, while executing `x`, many
error messages may have been logged. Recall that we need an error per alternative at `mergeFailures`.
Thus, we decided to set `errToSorry` to `false` whenever processing choice nodes and overloaded symbols.
Important: we rely on the property that after `errToSorry` is set to
false, no elaboration function executed by `x` will reset it to
`true`.
-/
private partial def elabAppFnId (fIdent : Syntax) (fExplicitUnivs : List Level) (lvals : List LVal)
(namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis overloaded : Bool) (acc : Array (TermElabResult Expr))
: TermElabM (Array (TermElabResult Expr)) := do
let funLVals ← withRef fIdent <| resolveName' fIdent fExplicitUnivs expectedType?
let overloaded := overloaded || funLVals.length > 1
-- Set `errToSorry` to `false` if `funLVals` > 1. See comment above about the interaction between `errToSorry` and `observing`.
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with errToSorry := funLVals.length == 1 && ctx.errToSorry }) do
funLVals.foldlM (init := acc) fun acc (f, fIdent, fields) => do
let lvals' := toLVals fields (first := true)
let s ← observing do
addTermInfo fIdent f expectedType?
let e ← elabAppLVals f (lvals' ++ lvals) namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
if overloaded then ensureHasType expectedType? e else pure e
return acc.push s
where
toName : List Syntax → Name
| [] => Name.anonymous
| field :: fields => Name.mkStr (toName fields) field.getId.toString
toLVals : List Syntax → (first : Bool) → List LVal
| [], _ => []
| field::fields, true => LVal.fieldName field field.getId.toString (toName (field::fields)) fIdent :: toLVals fields false
| field::fields, false => LVal.fieldName field field.getId.toString none fIdent :: toLVals fields false
private partial def elabAppFn (f : Syntax) (lvals : List LVal) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg)
(expectedType? : Option Expr) (explicit ellipsis overloaded : Bool) (acc : Array (TermElabResult Expr)) : TermElabM (Array (TermElabResult Expr)) :=
if f.getKind == choiceKind then
-- Set `errToSorry` to `false` when processing choice nodes. See comment above about the interaction between `errToSorry` and `observing`.
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with errToSorry := false }) do
f.getArgs.foldlM (fun acc f => elabAppFn f lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis true acc) acc
else
let elabFieldName (e field : Syntax) := do
let newLVals := field.identComponents.map fun comp =>
-- We use `none` in `suffix?` since `field` can't be part of a composite name
LVal.fieldName comp (toString comp.getId) none e
elabAppFn e (newLVals ++ lvals) namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
let elabFieldIdx (e idxStx : Syntax) := do
let idx := idxStx.isFieldIdx?.get!
elabAppFn e (LVal.fieldIdx idxStx idx :: lvals) namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
match f with
| `($(e).$idx:fieldIdx) => elabFieldIdx e idx
| `($e |>.$idx:fieldIdx) => elabFieldIdx e idx
| `($(e).$field:ident) => elabFieldName e field
| `($e |>.$field:ident) => elabFieldName e field
| `($e[%$bracket $idx]) => elabAppFn e (LVal.getOp bracket idx :: lvals) namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
| `($id:ident@$t:term) =>
throwError "unexpected occurrence of named pattern"
| `($id:ident) => do
elabAppFnId id [] lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
| `($id:ident.{$us,*}) => do
let us ← elabExplicitUnivs us
elabAppFnId id us lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis overloaded acc
| `(@$id:ident) =>
elabAppFn id lvals namedArgs args expectedType? (explicit := true) ellipsis overloaded acc
| `(@$id:ident.{$us,*}) =>
elabAppFn (f.getArg 1) lvals namedArgs args expectedType? (explicit := true) ellipsis overloaded acc
| `(@$t) => throwUnsupportedSyntax -- invalid occurrence of `@`
| `(_) => throwError "placeholders '_' cannot be used where a function is expected"
| _ => do
let catchPostpone := !overloaded
/- If we are processing a choice node, then we should use `catchPostpone == false` when elaborating terms.
Recall that `observing` does not catch `postponeExceptionId`. -/
if lvals.isEmpty && namedArgs.isEmpty && args.isEmpty then
/- Recall that elabAppFn is used for elaborating atomics terms **and** choice nodes that may contain
arbitrary terms. If they are not being used as a function, we should elaborate using the expectedType. -/
let s ←
if overloaded then
observing <| elabTermEnsuringType f expectedType? catchPostpone
else
observing <| elabTerm f expectedType?
return acc.push s
else
let s ← observing do
let f ← elabTerm f none catchPostpone
let e ← elabAppLVals f lvals namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
if overloaded then ensureHasType expectedType? e else pure e
return acc.push s
private def isSuccess (candidate : TermElabResult Expr) : Bool :=
match candidate with
| EStateM.Result.ok _ _ => true
| _ => false
private def getSuccess (candidates : Array (TermElabResult Expr)) : Array (TermElabResult Expr) :=
candidates.filter isSuccess
private def toMessageData (ex : Exception) : TermElabM MessageData := do
let pos ← getRefPos
match ex.getRef.getPos? with
| none => return ex.toMessageData
| some exPos =>
if pos == exPos then
return ex.toMessageData
else
let exPosition := (← getFileMap).toPosition exPos
return m!"{exPosition.line}:{exPosition.column} {ex.toMessageData}"
private def toMessageList (msgs : Array MessageData) : MessageData :=
indentD (MessageData.joinSep msgs.toList m!"\n\n")
private def mergeFailures {α} (failures : Array (TermElabResult Expr)) : TermElabM α := do
let msgs ← failures.mapM fun failure =>
match failure with
| EStateM.Result.ok _ _ => unreachable!
| EStateM.Result.error ex _ => toMessageData ex
throwError "overloaded, errors {toMessageList msgs}"
private def elabAppAux (f : Syntax) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg) (ellipsis : Bool) (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let candidates ← elabAppFn f [] namedArgs args expectedType? (explicit := false) (ellipsis := ellipsis) (overloaded := false) #[]
if candidates.size == 1 then
applyResult candidates[0]
else
let successes := getSuccess candidates
if successes.size == 1 then
applyResult successes[0]
else if successes.size > 1 then
let lctx ← getLCtx
let opts ← getOptions
let msgs : Array MessageData := successes.map fun success => match success with
| EStateM.Result.ok e s => MessageData.withContext { env := s.meta.core.env, mctx := s.meta.meta.mctx, lctx := lctx, opts := opts } e
| _ => unreachable!
throwErrorAt f "ambiguous, possible interpretations {toMessageList msgs}"
else
withRef f <| mergeFailures candidates
@[builtinTermElab app] def elabApp : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
withoutPostponingUniverseConstraints do
let (f, namedArgs, args, ellipsis) ← expandApp stx
elabAppAux f namedArgs args (ellipsis := ellipsis) expectedType?
private def elabAtom : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
elabAppAux stx #[] #[] (ellipsis := false) expectedType?
@[builtinTermElab ident] def elabIdent : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab namedPattern] def elabNamedPattern : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab explicitUniv] def elabExplicitUniv : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab pipeProj] def elabPipeProj : TermElab
| `($e |>.$f $args*), expectedType? =>
withoutPostponingUniverseConstraints do
let (namedArgs, args, ellipsis) ← expandArgs args
elabAppAux (← `($e |>.$f)) namedArgs args (ellipsis := ellipsis) expectedType?
| _, _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab explicit] def elabExplicit : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
match stx with
| `(@$id:ident) => elabAtom stx expectedType? -- Recall that `elabApp` also has support for `@`
| `(@$id:ident.{$us,*}) => elabAtom stx expectedType?
| `(@($t)) => elabTerm t expectedType? (implicitLambda := false) -- `@` is being used just to disable implicit lambdas
| `(@$t) => elabTerm t expectedType? (implicitLambda := false) -- `@` is being used just to disable implicit lambdas
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab choice] def elabChoice : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab proj] def elabProj : TermElab := elabAtom
@[builtinTermElab arrayRef] def elabArrayRef : TermElab := elabAtom
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Elab.app
end Lean.Elab.Term
|
fdd8554285079f9a121a23c0495d00e1e4a19c6a | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/measure_theory/measurable_space.lean | b240ba194da85139e1da2d7997a3c84f1e40ff6f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 66,009 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.prod.tprod
import group_theory.coset
import logic.equiv.fin
import measure_theory.measurable_space_def
import order.filter.small_sets
import order.liminf_limsup
import measure_theory.tactic
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file provides properties of measurable spaces and the functions and isomorphisms
between them. The definition of a measurable space is in `measure_theory.measurable_space_def`.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of
subsets closed under complementation and countable union. A function
between measurable spaces is measurable if the preimage of each
measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order
σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂` if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is
also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`). In particular, any
collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which
contains all of them. A function `f : α → β` induces a Galois connection
between the lattices of σ-algebras on `α` and `β`.
A measurable equivalence between measurable spaces is an equivalence
which respects the σ-algebras, that is, for which both directions of
the equivalence are measurable functions.
We say that a filter `f` is measurably generated if every set `s ∈ f` includes a measurable
set `t ∈ f`. This property is useful, e.g., to extract a measurable witness of `filter.eventually`.
## Notation
* We write `α ≃ᵐ β` for measurable equivalences between the measurable spaces `α` and `β`.
This should not be confused with `≃ₘ` which is used for diffeomorphisms between manifolds.
## Implementation notes
Measurability of a function `f : α → β` between measurable spaces is
defined in terms of the Galois connection induced by f.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function, measurable equivalence, dynkin system,
π-λ theorem, π-system
-/
open set encodable function equiv
open_locale filter measure_theory
variables {α β γ δ δ' : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {s t u : set α}
namespace measurable_space
section functors
variables {m m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} {m' : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
/-- The forward image of a measurable space under a function. `map f m` contains the sets
`s : set β` whose preimage under `f` is measurable. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (m : measurable_space α) : measurable_space β :=
{ measurable_set' := λ s, measurable_set[m] $ f ⁻¹' s,
measurable_set_empty := m.measurable_set_empty,
measurable_set_compl := assume s hs, m.measurable_set_compl _ hs,
measurable_set_Union := assume f hf, by { rw preimage_Union, exact m.measurable_set_Union _ hf }}
@[simp] lemma map_id : m.map id = m :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (m.map f).map g = m.map (g ∘ f) :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, iff.rfl
/-- The reverse image of a measurable space under a function. `comap f m` contains the sets
`s : set α` such that `s` is the `f`-preimage of a measurable set in `β`. -/
protected def comap (f : α → β) (m : measurable_space β) : measurable_space α :=
{ measurable_set' := λ s, ∃s', measurable_set[m] s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s,
measurable_set_empty := ⟨∅, m.measurable_set_empty, rfl⟩,
measurable_set_compl := assume s ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨s'ᶜ, m.measurable_set_compl _ h₁, h₂ ▸ rfl⟩,
measurable_set_Union := assume s hs,
let ⟨s', hs'⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice hs in
⟨⋃ i, s' i, m.measurable_set_Union _ (λ i, (hs' i).left), by simp [hs'] ⟩ }
lemma comap_eq_generate_from (m : measurable_space β) (f : α → β) :
m.comap f = generate_from {t | ∃ s, measurable_set s ∧ f ⁻¹' s = t} :=
by convert generate_from_measurable_set.symm
@[simp] lemma comap_id : m.comap id = m :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, ⟨assume ⟨s', hs', h⟩, h ▸ hs', assume h, ⟨s, h, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_comp {f : β → α} {g : γ → β} : (m.comap f).comap g = m.comap (f ∘ g) :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s,
⟨assume ⟨t, ⟨u, h, hu⟩, ht⟩, ⟨u, h, ht ▸ hu ▸ rfl⟩, assume ⟨t, h, ht⟩, ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, ht⟩⟩
lemma comap_le_iff_le_map {f : α → β} : m'.comap f ≤ m ↔ m' ≤ m.map f :=
⟨assume h s hs, h _ ⟨_, hs, rfl⟩, assume h s ⟨t, ht, heq⟩, heq ▸ h _ ht⟩
lemma gc_comap_map (f : α → β) :
galois_connection (measurable_space.comap f) (measurable_space.map f) :=
assume f g, comap_le_iff_le_map
lemma map_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.map f ≤ m₂.map f := (gc_comap_map f).monotone_u h
lemma monotone_map : monotone (measurable_space.map f) := assume a b h, map_mono h
lemma comap_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.comap g ≤ m₂.comap g := (gc_comap_map g).monotone_l h
lemma monotone_comap : monotone (measurable_space.comap g) := assume a b h, comap_mono h
@[simp] lemma comap_bot : (⊥ : measurable_space α).comap g = ⊥ := (gc_comap_map g).l_bot
@[simp] lemma comap_sup : (m₁ ⊔ m₂).comap g = m₁.comap g ⊔ m₂.comap g := (gc_comap_map g).l_sup
@[simp] lemma comap_supr {m : ι → measurable_space α} : (⨆i, m i).comap g = (⨆i, (m i).comap g) :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_supr
@[simp] lemma map_top : (⊤ : measurable_space α).map f = ⊤ := (gc_comap_map f).u_top
@[simp] lemma map_inf : (m₁ ⊓ m₂).map f = m₁.map f ⊓ m₂.map f := (gc_comap_map f).u_inf
@[simp] lemma map_infi {m : ι → measurable_space α} : (⨅i, m i).map f = (⨅i, (m i).map f) :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_infi
lemma comap_map_le : (m.map f).comap f ≤ m := (gc_comap_map f).l_u_le _
lemma le_map_comap : m ≤ (m.comap g).map g := (gc_comap_map g).le_u_l _
end functors
lemma comap_generate_from {f : α → β} {s : set (set β)} :
(generate_from s).comap f = generate_from (preimage f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ generate_from_le $ assume t hts,
generate_measurable.basic _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ $ hts)
(generate_from_le $ assume t ⟨u, hu, eq⟩, eq ▸ ⟨u, generate_measurable.basic _ hu, rfl⟩)
end measurable_space
section measurable_functions
open measurable_space
lemma measurable_iff_le_map {m₁ : measurable_space α} {m₂ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} :
measurable f ↔ m₂ ≤ m₁.map f :=
iff.rfl
alias measurable_iff_le_map ↔ measurable.le_map measurable.of_le_map
lemma measurable_iff_comap_le {m₁ : measurable_space α} {m₂ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} :
measurable f ↔ m₂.comap f ≤ m₁ :=
comap_le_iff_le_map.symm
alias measurable_iff_comap_le ↔ measurable.comap_le measurable.of_comap_le
lemma comap_measurable {m : measurable_space β} (f : α → β) :
measurable[m.comap f] f :=
λ s hs, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
lemma measurable.mono {ma ma' : measurable_space α} {mb mb' : measurable_space β} {f : α → β}
(hf : @measurable α β ma mb f) (ha : ma ≤ ma') (hb : mb' ≤ mb) :
@measurable α β ma' mb' f :=
λ t ht, ha _ $ hf $ hb _ ht
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_from_top [measurable_space β] {f : α → β} : measurable[⊤] f :=
λ s hs, trivial
lemma measurable_generate_from [measurable_space α] {s : set (set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' t)) : @measurable _ _ _ (generate_from s) f :=
measurable.of_le_map $ generate_from_le h
variables {f g : α → β}
section typeclass_measurable_space
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
@[nontriviality, measurability]
lemma subsingleton.measurable [subsingleton α] : measurable f :=
λ s hs, @subsingleton.measurable_set α _ _ _
@[nontriviality, measurability]
lemma measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [subsingleton β] (f : α → β) :
measurable f :=
λ s hs, subsingleton.set_cases measurable_set.empty measurable_set.univ s
@[to_additive]
lemma measurable_one [has_one α] : measurable (1 : β → α) := @measurable_const _ _ _ _ 1
lemma measurable_of_empty [is_empty α] (f : α → β) : measurable f :=
subsingleton.measurable
lemma measurable_of_empty_codomain [is_empty β] (f : α → β) : measurable f :=
by { haveI := function.is_empty f, exact measurable_of_empty f }
/-- A version of `measurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`. This version works
for functions between empty types. -/
lemma measurable_const' {f : β → α} (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : measurable f :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty β,
{ exact measurable_of_empty f },
{ convert measurable_const, exact funext (λ x, hf x h.some) }
end
lemma measurable_of_finite [finite α] [measurable_singleton_class α] (f : α → β) : measurable f :=
λ s hs, (f ⁻¹' s).to_finite.measurable_set
lemma measurable_of_countable [countable α] [measurable_singleton_class α] (f : α → β) :
measurable f :=
λ s hs, (f ⁻¹' s).to_countable.measurable_set
end typeclass_measurable_space
variables {m : measurable_space α}
include m
@[measurability] lemma measurable.iterate {f : α → α} (hf : measurable f) : ∀ n, measurable (f^[n])
| 0 := measurable_id
| (n+1) := (measurable.iterate n).comp hf
variables {mβ : measurable_space β}
include mβ
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_preimage {t : set β} (hf : measurable f) (ht : measurable_set t) :
measurable_set (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.piecewise {_ : decidable_pred (∈ s)} (hs : measurable_set s)
(hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (piecewise s f g) :=
begin
intros t ht,
rw piecewise_preimage,
exact hs.ite (hf ht) (hg ht)
end
/-- this is slightly different from `measurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`measurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact measurable.ite (measurable_set_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const`,
but replacing `measurable.ite` by `measurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
lemma measurable.ite {p : α → Prop} {_ : decidable_pred p}
(hp : measurable_set {a : α | p a}) (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ x, ite (p x) (f x) (g x)) :=
measurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.indicator [has_zero β] (hf : measurable f) (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs measurable_const
@[measurability, to_additive] lemma measurable_set_mul_support [has_one β]
[measurable_singleton_class β] (hf : measurable f) :
measurable_set (mul_support f) :=
hf (measurable_set_singleton 1).compl
/-- If a function coincides with a measurable function outside of a countable set, it is
measurable. -/
lemma measurable.measurable_of_countable_ne [measurable_singleton_class α]
(hf : measurable f) (h : set.countable {x | f x ≠ g x}) : measurable g :=
begin
assume t ht,
have : g ⁻¹' t = (g ⁻¹' t ∩ {x | f x = g x}ᶜ) ∪ (g ⁻¹' t ∩ {x | f x = g x}),
by simp [← inter_union_distrib_left],
rw this,
apply measurable_set.union (h.mono (inter_subset_right _ _)).measurable_set,
have : g ⁻¹' t ∩ {x : α | f x = g x} = f ⁻¹' t ∩ {x : α | f x = g x},
by { ext x, simp {contextual := tt} },
rw this,
exact (hf ht).inter h.measurable_set.of_compl,
end
end measurable_functions
section constructions
instance : measurable_space empty := ⊤
instance : measurable_space punit := ⊤ -- this also works for `unit`
instance : measurable_space bool := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℕ := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℤ := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℚ := ⊤
instance : measurable_singleton_class empty := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class punit := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class bool := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class ℕ := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class ℤ := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class ℚ := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
lemma measurable_to_countable [measurable_space α] [countable α] [measurable_space β] {f : β → α}
(h : ∀ y, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' {f y})) :
measurable f :=
begin
assume s hs,
rw [← bUnion_preimage_singleton],
refine measurable_set.Union (λ y, measurable_set.Union $ λ hy, _),
by_cases hyf : y ∈ range f,
{ rcases hyf with ⟨y, rfl⟩,
apply h },
{ simp only [preimage_singleton_eq_empty.2 hyf, measurable_set.empty] }
end
@[measurability] lemma measurable_unit [measurable_space α] (f : unit → α) : measurable f :=
measurable_from_top
section nat
variables [measurable_space α]
@[measurability] lemma measurable_from_nat {f : ℕ → α} : measurable f :=
measurable_from_top
lemma measurable_to_nat {f : α → ℕ} : (∀ y, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' {f y})) → measurable f :=
measurable_to_countable
lemma measurable_find_greatest' {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (p x)]
{N : ℕ} (hN : ∀ k ≤ N, measurable_set {x | nat.find_greatest (p x) N = k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find_greatest (p x) N) :=
measurable_to_nat $ λ x, hN _ N.find_greatest_le
lemma measurable_find_greatest {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (p x)]
{N} (hN : ∀ k ≤ N, measurable_set {x | p x k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find_greatest (p x) N) :=
begin
refine measurable_find_greatest' (λ k hk, _),
simp only [nat.find_greatest_eq_iff, set_of_and, set_of_forall, ← compl_set_of],
repeat { apply_rules [measurable_set.inter, measurable_set.const, measurable_set.Inter,
measurable_set.compl, hN]; try { intros } }
end
lemma measurable_find {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (p x)]
(hp : ∀ x, ∃ N, p x N) (hm : ∀ k, measurable_set {x | p x k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find (hp x)) :=
begin
refine measurable_to_nat (λ x, _),
rw [preimage_find_eq_disjointed],
exact measurable_set.disjointed hm _
end
end nat
section quotient
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β]
instance {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [m : measurable_space α] : measurable_space (quot r) :=
m.map (quot.mk r)
instance {α} {s : setoid α} [m : measurable_space α] : measurable_space (quotient s) :=
m.map quotient.mk'
@[to_additive]
instance _root_.quotient_group.measurable_space {G} [group G] [measurable_space G]
(S : subgroup G) : measurable_space (G ⧸ S) :=
quotient.measurable_space
lemma measurable_set_quotient {s : setoid α} {t : set (quotient s)} :
measurable_set t ↔ measurable_set (quotient.mk' ⁻¹' t) :=
iff.rfl
lemma measurable_from_quotient {s : setoid α} {f : quotient s → β} :
measurable f ↔ measurable (f ∘ quotient.mk') :=
iff.rfl
@[measurability] lemma measurable_quotient_mk [s : setoid α] :
measurable (quotient.mk : α → quotient s) :=
λ s, id
@[measurability] lemma measurable_quotient_mk' {s : setoid α} :
measurable (quotient.mk' : α → quotient s) :=
λ s, id
@[measurability] lemma measurable_quot_mk {r : α → α → Prop} :
measurable (quot.mk r) :=
λ s, id
@[to_additive] lemma quotient_group.measurable_coe {G} [group G] [measurable_space G]
{S : subgroup G} : measurable (coe : G → G ⧸ S) :=
measurable_quotient_mk'
attribute [measurability] quotient_group.measurable_coe quotient_add_group.measurable_coe
@[to_additive] lemma quotient_group.measurable_from_quotient {G} [group G] [measurable_space G]
{S : subgroup G} {f : G ⧸ S → α} :
measurable f ↔ measurable (f ∘ (coe : G → G ⧸ S)) :=
measurable_from_quotient
end quotient
section subtype
instance {α} {p : α → Prop} [m : measurable_space α] : measurable_space (subtype p) :=
m.comap (coe : _ → α)
section
variables [measurable_space α]
@[measurability] lemma measurable_subtype_coe {p : α → Prop} : measurable (coe : subtype p → α) :=
measurable_space.le_map_comap
instance {p : α → Prop} [measurable_singleton_class α] : measurable_singleton_class (subtype p) :=
{ measurable_set_singleton := λ x,
begin
have : measurable_set {(x : α)} := measurable_set_singleton _,
convert @measurable_subtype_coe α _ p _ this,
ext y,
simp [subtype.ext_iff],
end }
end
variables {m : measurable_space α} {mβ : measurable_space β}
include m
lemma measurable_set.subtype_image {s : set α} {t : set s}
(hs : measurable_set s) : measurable_set t → measurable_set ((coe : s → α) '' t)
| ⟨u, (hu : measurable_set u), (eq : coe ⁻¹' u = t)⟩ :=
begin
rw [← eq, subtype.image_preimage_coe],
exact hu.inter hs
end
include mβ
@[measurability] lemma measurable.subtype_coe {p : β → Prop} {f : α → subtype p}
(hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a : β)) :=
measurable_subtype_coe.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.subtype_mk {p : β → Prop} {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f) {h : ∀ x, p (f x)} :
measurable (λ x, (⟨f x, h x⟩ : subtype p)) :=
λ t ⟨s, hs⟩, hs.2 ▸ by simp only [← preimage_comp, (∘), subtype.coe_mk, hf hs.1]
lemma measurable_of_measurable_union_cover
{f : α → β} (s t : set α) (hs : measurable_set s) (ht : measurable_set t) (h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t)
(hc : measurable (λ a : s, f a)) (hd : measurable (λ a : t, f a)) :
measurable f :=
begin
intros u hu,
convert (hs.subtype_image (hc hu)).union (ht.subtype_image (hd hu)),
change f ⁻¹' u = coe '' (coe ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' u) : set s) ∪ coe '' (coe ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' u) : set t),
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, subtype.range_coe,
subtype.range_coe, ← inter_distrib_left, univ_subset_iff.1 h, inter_univ],
end
lemma measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(hs : measurable_set s) (h₁ : measurable (s.restrict f)) (h₂ : measurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_union_cover s sᶜ hs hs.compl (union_compl_self s).ge h₁ h₂
lemma measurable.dite [∀ x, decidable (x ∈ s)] {f : s → β} (hf : measurable f)
{g : sᶜ → β} (hg : measurable g) (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable (λ x, if hx : x ∈ s then f ⟨x, hx⟩ else g ⟨x, hx⟩) :=
measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs (by simpa) (by simpa)
lemma measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite [measurable_singleton_class α]
{f : α → β} (s : set α) (hs : s.finite) (hf : measurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
measurable f :=
begin
letI : fintype s := finite.fintype hs,
exact measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs.measurable_set
(measurable_of_finite _) hf
end
lemma measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton [measurable_singleton_class α]
{f : α → β} (a : α) (hf : measurable ({x | x ≠ a}.restrict f)) :
measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite {a} (finite_singleton a) hf
end subtype
section prod
/-- A `measurable_space` structure on the product of two measurable spaces. -/
def measurable_space.prod {α β} (m₁ : measurable_space α) (m₂ : measurable_space β) :
measurable_space (α × β) :=
m₁.comap prod.fst ⊔ m₂.comap prod.snd
instance {α β} [m₁ : measurable_space α] [m₂ : measurable_space β] : measurable_space (α × β) :=
m₁.prod m₂
@[measurability] lemma measurable_fst {ma : measurable_space α} {mb : measurable_space β} :
measurable (prod.fst : α × β → α) :=
measurable.of_comap_le le_sup_left
@[measurability] lemma measurable_snd {ma : measurable_space α} {mb : measurable_space β} :
measurable (prod.snd : α × β → β) :=
measurable.of_comap_le le_sup_right
variables {m : measurable_space α} {mβ : measurable_space β} {mγ : measurable_space γ}
include m mβ mγ
lemma measurable.fst {f : α → β × γ} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a).1) :=
measurable_fst.comp hf
lemma measurable.snd {f : α → β × γ} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a).2) :=
measurable_snd.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.prod {f : α → β × γ}
(hf₁ : measurable (λ a, (f a).1)) (hf₂ : measurable (λ a, (f a).2)) : measurable f :=
measurable.of_le_map $ sup_le
(by { rw [measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map, measurable_space.map_comp], exact hf₁ })
(by { rw [measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map, measurable_space.map_comp], exact hf₂ })
lemma measurable.prod_mk {β γ} {mβ : measurable_space β}
{mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a, g a)) :=
measurable.prod hf hg
lemma measurable.prod_map [measurable_space δ] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ} (hf : measurable f)
(hg : measurable g) : measurable (prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk (hg.comp measurable_snd)
omit mγ
lemma measurable_prod_mk_left {x : α} : measurable (@prod.mk _ β x) :=
measurable_const.prod_mk measurable_id
lemma measurable_prod_mk_right {y : β} : measurable (λ x : α, (x, y)) :=
measurable_id.prod_mk measurable_const
include mγ
lemma measurable.of_uncurry_left {f : α → β → γ} (hf : measurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} :
measurable (f x) :=
hf.comp measurable_prod_mk_left
lemma measurable.of_uncurry_right {f : α → β → γ} (hf : measurable (uncurry f)) {y : β} :
measurable (λ x, f x y) :=
hf.comp measurable_prod_mk_right
lemma measurable_prod {f : α → β × γ} : measurable f ↔
measurable (λ a, (f a).1) ∧ measurable (λ a, (f a).2) :=
⟨λ hf, ⟨measurable_fst.comp hf, measurable_snd.comp hf⟩, λ h, measurable.prod h.1 h.2⟩
omit mγ
@[measurability] lemma measurable_swap :
measurable (prod.swap : α × β → β × α) :=
measurable.prod measurable_snd measurable_fst
lemma measurable_swap_iff {mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
measurable (f ∘ prod.swap) ↔ measurable f :=
⟨λ hf, by { convert hf.comp measurable_swap, ext ⟨x, y⟩, refl }, λ hf, hf.comp measurable_swap⟩
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set.prod {s : set α} {t : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) (ht : measurable_set t) :
measurable_set (s ×ˢ t) :=
measurable_set.inter (measurable_fst hs) (measurable_snd ht)
lemma measurable_set_prod_of_nonempty {s : set α} {t : set β} (h : (s ×ˢ t).nonempty) :
measurable_set (s ×ˢ t) ↔ measurable_set s ∧ measurable_set t :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hx, hy⟩,
refine ⟨λ hst, _, λ h, h.1.prod h.2⟩,
have : measurable_set ((λ x, (x, y)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t) := measurable_prod_mk_right hst,
have : measurable_set (prod.mk x ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t) := measurable_prod_mk_left hst,
simp * at *
end
lemma measurable_set_prod {s : set α} {t : set β} :
measurable_set (s ×ˢ t) ↔ (measurable_set s ∧ measurable_set t) ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
begin
cases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h] },
{ simp [←not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, prod_nonempty_iff.mp h, measurable_set_prod_of_nonempty h] }
end
lemma measurable_set_swap_iff {s : set (α × β)} :
measurable_set (prod.swap ⁻¹' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨λ hs, by { convert measurable_swap hs, ext ⟨x, y⟩, refl }, λ hs, measurable_swap hs⟩
instance [measurable_singleton_class α] [measurable_singleton_class β] :
measurable_singleton_class (α × β) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, @singleton_prod_singleton _ _ a b ▸
(measurable_set_singleton a).prod (measurable_set_singleton b)⟩
lemma measurable_from_prod_countable [countable β] [measurable_singleton_class β]
{mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α × β → γ} (hf : ∀ y, measurable (λ x, f (x, y))) :
measurable f :=
begin
intros s hs,
have : f ⁻¹' s = ⋃ y, ((λ x, f (x, y)) ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ ({y} : set β),
{ ext1 ⟨x, y⟩,
simp [and_assoc, and.left_comm] },
rw this,
exact measurable_set.Union (λ y, (hf y hs).prod (measurable_set_singleton y))
end
/-- A piecewise function on countably many pieces is measurable if all the data is measurable. -/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.find {m : measurable_space α}
{f : ℕ → α → β} {p : ℕ → α → Prop} [∀ n, decidable_pred (p n)]
(hf : ∀ n, measurable (f n)) (hp : ∀ n, measurable_set {x | p n x}) (h : ∀ x, ∃ n, p n x) :
measurable (λ x, f (nat.find (h x)) x) :=
begin
have : measurable (λ (p : α × ℕ), f p.2 p.1) := measurable_from_prod_countable (λ n, hf n),
exact this.comp (measurable.prod_mk measurable_id (measurable_find h hp)),
end
/-- Given countably many disjoint measurable sets `t n` and countably many measurable
functions `g n`, one can construct a measurable function that coincides with `g n` on `t n`. -/
lemma exists_measurable_piecewise_nat {m : measurable_space α} (t : ℕ → set β)
(t_meas : ∀ n, measurable_set (t n)) (t_disj : pairwise (disjoint on t))
(g : ℕ → β → α) (hg : ∀ n, measurable (g n)) :
∃ f : β → α, measurable f ∧ (∀ n x, x ∈ t n → f x = g n x) :=
begin
classical,
let p : ℕ → β → Prop := λ n x, x ∈ t n ∪ (⋃ k, t k)ᶜ,
have M : ∀ n, measurable_set {x | p n x} :=
λ n, (t_meas n).union (measurable_set.compl (measurable_set.Union t_meas)),
have P : ∀ x, ∃ n, p n x,
{ assume x,
by_cases H : ∀ (i : ℕ), x ∉ t i,
{ exact ⟨0, or.inr (by simpa only [mem_Inter, compl_Union] using H)⟩ },
{ simp only [not_forall, not_not_mem] at H,
rcases H with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact ⟨n, or.inl hn⟩ } },
refine ⟨λ x, g (nat.find (P x)) x, measurable.find hg M P, _⟩,
assume n x hx,
have : x ∈ t (nat.find (P x)),
{ have B : x ∈ t (nat.find (P x)) ∪ (⋃ k, t k)ᶜ := nat.find_spec (P x),
have B' : (∀ (i : ℕ), x ∉ t i) ↔ false,
{ simp only [iff_false, not_forall, not_not_mem], exact ⟨n, hx⟩ },
simpa only [B', mem_union, mem_Inter, or_false, compl_Union, mem_compl_iff] using B },
congr,
by_contra h,
exact (t_disj (ne.symm h)).le_bot ⟨hx, this⟩
end
end prod
section pi
variables {π : δ → Type*} [measurable_space α]
instance measurable_space.pi [m : Π a, measurable_space (π a)] : measurable_space (Π a, π a) :=
⨆ a, (m a).comap (λ b, b a)
variables [Π a, measurable_space (π a)] [measurable_space γ]
lemma measurable_pi_iff {g : α → Π a, π a} :
measurable g ↔ ∀ a, measurable (λ x, g x a) :=
by simp_rw [measurable_iff_comap_le, measurable_space.pi, measurable_space.comap_supr,
measurable_space.comap_comp, function.comp, supr_le_iff]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_pi_apply (a : δ) : measurable (λ f : Π a, π a, f a) :=
measurable.of_comap_le $ le_supr _ a
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.eval {a : δ} {g : α → Π a, π a}
(hg : measurable g) : measurable (λ x, g x a) :=
(measurable_pi_apply a).comp hg
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_pi_lambda (f : α → Π a, π a) (hf : ∀ a, measurable (λ c, f c a)) :
measurable f :=
measurable_pi_iff.mpr hf
/-- The function `update f a : π a → Π a, π a` is always measurable.
This doesn't require `f` to be measurable.
This should not be confused with the statement that `update f a x` is measurable. -/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_update (f : Π (a : δ), π a) {a : δ} [decidable_eq δ] : measurable (update f a) :=
begin
apply measurable_pi_lambda,
intro x, by_cases hx : x = a,
{ cases hx, convert measurable_id, ext, simp },
simp_rw [update_noteq hx], apply measurable_const,
end
/- Even though we cannot use projection notation, we still keep a dot to be consistent with similar
lemmas, like `measurable_set.prod`. -/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set.pi {s : set δ} {t : Π i : δ, set (π i)} (hs : s.countable)
(ht : ∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i)) :
measurable_set (s.pi t) :=
by { rw [pi_def], exact measurable_set.bInter hs (λ i hi, measurable_pi_apply _ (ht i hi)) }
lemma measurable_set.univ_pi [countable δ] {t : Π i : δ, set (π i)}
(ht : ∀ i, measurable_set (t i)) : measurable_set (pi univ t) :=
measurable_set.pi (to_countable _) (λ i _, ht i)
lemma measurable_set_pi_of_nonempty
{s : set δ} {t : Π i, set (π i)} (hs : s.countable)
(h : (pi s t).nonempty) : measurable_set (pi s t) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i) :=
begin
classical,
rcases h with ⟨f, hf⟩, refine ⟨λ hst i hi, _, measurable_set.pi hs⟩,
convert measurable_update f hst, rw [update_preimage_pi hi], exact λ j hj _, hf j hj
end
lemma measurable_set_pi {s : set δ} {t : Π i, set (π i)} (hs : s.countable) :
measurable_set (pi s t) ↔ (∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i)) ∨ pi s t = ∅ :=
begin
cases (pi s t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h] },
{ simp [measurable_set_pi_of_nonempty hs, h, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] }
end
instance [countable δ] [Π a, measurable_singleton_class (π a)] :
measurable_singleton_class (Π a, π a) :=
⟨λ f, univ_pi_singleton f ▸ measurable_set.univ_pi (λ t, measurable_set_singleton (f t))⟩
variable (π)
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm (p : δ → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
measurable (equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod p π).symm :=
begin
apply measurable_pi_iff.2 (λ j, _),
by_cases hj : p j,
{ simp only [hj, dif_pos, equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm_apply],
have : measurable (λ (f : (Π (i : {x // p x}), π ↑i)), f ⟨j, hj⟩) :=
measurable_pi_apply ⟨j, hj⟩,
exact measurable.comp this measurable_fst },
{ simp only [hj, equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm_apply, dif_neg, not_false_iff],
have : measurable (λ (f : (Π (i : {x // ¬ p x}), π ↑i)), f ⟨j, hj⟩) :=
measurable_pi_apply ⟨j, hj⟩,
exact measurable.comp this measurable_snd }
end
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod (p : δ → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
measurable (equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod p π) :=
begin
refine measurable_prod.2 _,
split;
{ apply measurable_pi_iff.2 (λ j, _),
simp only [pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_apply, measurable_pi_apply] }
end
end pi
instance tprod.measurable_space (π : δ → Type*) [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)] :
∀ (l : list δ), measurable_space (list.tprod π l)
| [] := punit.measurable_space
| (i :: is) := @prod.measurable_space _ _ _ (tprod.measurable_space is)
section tprod
open list
variables {π : δ → Type*} [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)]
lemma measurable_tprod_mk (l : list δ) : measurable (@tprod.mk δ π l) :=
begin
induction l with i l ih,
{ exact measurable_const },
{ exact (measurable_pi_apply i).prod_mk ih }
end
lemma measurable_tprod_elim [decidable_eq δ] : ∀ {l : list δ} {i : δ} (hi : i ∈ l),
measurable (λ (v : tprod π l), v.elim hi)
| (i :: is) j hj := begin
by_cases hji : j = i,
{ subst hji, simp [measurable_fst] },
{ rw [funext $ tprod.elim_of_ne _ hji],
exact (measurable_tprod_elim (hj.resolve_left hji)).comp measurable_snd }
end
lemma measurable_tprod_elim' [decidable_eq δ] {l : list δ} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ l) :
measurable (tprod.elim' h : tprod π l → Π i, π i) :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, measurable_tprod_elim (h i))
lemma measurable_set.tprod (l : list δ) {s : ∀ i, set (π i)} (hs : ∀ i, measurable_set (s i)) :
measurable_set (set.tprod l s) :=
by { induction l with i l ih, exact measurable_set.univ, exact (hs i).prod ih }
end tprod
instance {α β} [m₁ : measurable_space α] [m₂ : measurable_space β] : measurable_space (α ⊕ β) :=
m₁.map sum.inl ⊓ m₂.map sum.inr
section sum
@[measurability] lemma measurable_inl [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] :
measurable (@sum.inl α β) :=
measurable.of_le_map inf_le_left
@[measurability] lemma measurable_inr [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] :
measurable (@sum.inr α β) :=
measurable.of_le_map inf_le_right
variables {m : measurable_space α} {mβ : measurable_space β}
include m mβ
lemma measurable_sum {mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α ⊕ β → γ}
(hl : measurable (f ∘ sum.inl)) (hr : measurable (f ∘ sum.inr)) : measurable f :=
measurable.of_comap_le $ le_inf
(measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ hl)
(measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ hr)
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.sum_elim {mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (sum.elim f g) :=
measurable_sum hf hg
lemma measurable_set.inl_image {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable_set (sum.inl '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
⟨show measurable_set (sum.inl ⁻¹' _), by { rwa [preimage_image_eq], exact (λ a b, sum.inl.inj) },
have sum.inr ⁻¹' (sum.inl '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨y, hy, eq⟩, by contradiction,
show measurable_set (sum.inr ⁻¹' _), by { rw [this], exact measurable_set.empty }⟩
lemma measurable_set_inr_image {s : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable_set (sum.inr '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
⟨ have sum.inl ⁻¹' (sum.inr '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨y, hy, eq⟩, by contradiction,
show measurable_set (sum.inl ⁻¹' _), by { rw [this], exact measurable_set.empty },
show measurable_set (sum.inr ⁻¹' _), by { rwa [preimage_image_eq], exact λ a b, sum.inr.inj }⟩
omit m
lemma measurable_set_range_inl [measurable_space α] :
measurable_set (range sum.inl : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
by { rw [← image_univ], exact measurable_set.univ.inl_image }
lemma measurable_set_range_inr [measurable_space α] :
measurable_set (range sum.inr : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
by { rw [← image_univ], exact measurable_set_inr_image measurable_set.univ }
end sum
instance {α} {β : α → Type*} [m : Πa, measurable_space (β a)] : measurable_space (sigma β) :=
⨅a, (m a).map (sigma.mk a)
end constructions
/-- A map `f : α → β` is called a *measurable embedding* if it is injective, measurable, and sends
measurable sets to measurable sets. The latter assumption can be replaced with “`f` has measurable
inverse `g : range f → α`”, see `measurable_embedding.measurable_range_splitting`,
`measurable_embedding.of_measurable_inverse_range`, and
`measurable_embedding.of_measurable_inverse`.
One more interpretation: `f` is a measurable embedding if it defines a measurable equivalence to its
range and the range is a measurable set. One implication is formalized as
`measurable_embedding.equiv_range`; the other one follows from
`measurable_equiv.measurable_embedding`, `measurable_embedding.subtype_coe`, and
`measurable_embedding.comp`. -/
@[protect_proj]
structure measurable_embedding {α β : Type*} [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] (f : α → β) :
Prop :=
(injective : injective f)
(measurable : measurable f)
(measurable_set_image' : ∀ ⦃s⦄, measurable_set s → measurable_set (f '' s))
namespace measurable_embedding
variables {mα : measurable_space α} [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
{f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
include mα
lemma measurable_set_image (hf : measurable_embedding f) {s : set α} :
measurable_set (f '' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [hf.injective.preimage_image] using hf.measurable h,
λ h, hf.measurable_set_image' h⟩
lemma id : measurable_embedding (id : α → α) :=
⟨injective_id, measurable_id, λ s hs, by rwa image_id⟩
lemma comp (hg : measurable_embedding g) (hf : measurable_embedding f) :
measurable_embedding (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hg.injective.comp hf.injective, hg.measurable.comp hf.measurable,
λ s hs, by rwa [← image_image, hg.measurable_set_image, hf.measurable_set_image]⟩
lemma subtype_coe {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) : measurable_embedding (coe : s → α) :=
{ injective := subtype.coe_injective,
measurable := measurable_subtype_coe,
measurable_set_image' := λ _, measurable_set.subtype_image hs }
lemma measurable_set_range (hf : measurable_embedding f) : measurable_set (range f) :=
by { rw ← image_univ, exact hf.measurable_set_image' measurable_set.univ }
lemma measurable_set_preimage (hf : measurable_embedding f) {s : set β} :
measurable_set (f ⁻¹' s) ↔ measurable_set (s ∩ range f) :=
by rw [← image_preimage_eq_inter_range, hf.measurable_set_image]
lemma measurable_range_splitting (hf : measurable_embedding f) :
measurable (range_splitting f) :=
λ s hs, by rwa [preimage_range_splitting hf.injective,
← (subtype_coe hf.measurable_set_range).measurable_set_image, ← image_comp,
coe_comp_range_factorization, hf.measurable_set_image]
lemma measurable_extend (hf : measurable_embedding f) {g : α → γ} {g' : β → γ}
(hg : measurable g) (hg' : measurable g') :
measurable (extend f g g') :=
begin
refine measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hf.measurable_set_range _ _,
{ rw restrict_extend_range,
simpa only [range_splitting] using hg.comp hf.measurable_range_splitting },
{ rw restrict_extend_compl_range, exact hg'.comp measurable_subtype_coe }
end
lemma exists_measurable_extend (hf : measurable_embedding f) {g : α → γ} (hg : measurable g)
(hne : β → nonempty γ) :
∃ g' : β → γ, measurable g' ∧ g' ∘ f = g :=
⟨extend f g (λ x, classical.choice (hne x)),
hf.measurable_extend hg (measurable_const' $ λ _ _, rfl),
funext $ λ x, hf.injective.extend_apply _ _ _⟩
lemma measurable_comp_iff (hg : measurable_embedding g) : measurable (g ∘ f) ↔ measurable f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, _, hg.measurable.comp⟩,
suffices : measurable ((range_splitting g ∘ range_factorization g) ∘ f),
by rwa [(right_inverse_range_splitting hg.injective).comp_eq_id] at this,
exact hg.measurable_range_splitting.comp H.subtype_mk
end
end measurable_embedding
lemma measurable_set.exists_measurable_proj {m : measurable_space α} {s : set α}
(hs : measurable_set s) (hne : s.nonempty) : ∃ f : α → s, measurable f ∧ ∀ x : s, f x = x :=
let ⟨f, hfm, hf⟩ := (measurable_embedding.subtype_coe hs).exists_measurable_extend
measurable_id (λ _, hne.to_subtype)
in ⟨f, hfm, congr_fun hf⟩
/-- Equivalences between measurable spaces. Main application is the simplification of measurability
statements along measurable equivalences. -/
structure measurable_equiv (α β : Type*) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] extends α ≃ β :=
(measurable_to_fun : measurable to_equiv)
(measurable_inv_fun : measurable to_equiv.symm)
infix ` ≃ᵐ `:25 := measurable_equiv
namespace measurable_equiv
variables (α β) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] [measurable_space δ]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (α ≃ᵐ β) (λ _, α → β) := ⟨λ e, e.to_fun⟩
variables {α β}
@[simp] lemma coe_to_equiv (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : (e.to_equiv : α → β) = e := rfl
@[measurability]
protected lemma measurable (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : measurable (e : α → β) :=
e.measurable_to_fun
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h1 : measurable e) (h2 : measurable e.symm) :
((⟨e, h1, h2⟩ : α ≃ᵐ β) : α → β) = e := rfl
/-- Any measurable space is equivalent to itself. -/
def refl (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : α ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.refl α,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id, measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id }
instance : inhabited (α ≃ᵐ α) := ⟨refl α⟩
/-- The composition of equivalences between measurable spaces. -/
def trans (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (bc : β ≃ᵐ γ) :
α ≃ᵐ γ :=
{ to_equiv := ab.to_equiv.trans bc.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun := bc.measurable_to_fun.comp ab.measurable_to_fun,
measurable_inv_fun := ab.measurable_inv_fun.comp bc.measurable_inv_fun }
/-- The inverse of an equivalence between measurable spaces. -/
def symm (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) : β ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := ab.to_equiv.symm,
measurable_to_fun := ab.measurable_inv_fun,
measurable_inv_fun := ab.measurable_to_fun }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : (e.to_equiv.symm : β → α) = e.symm := rfl
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def simps.apply (h : α ≃ᵐ β) : α → β := h
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵐ β) : β → α := h.symm
initialize_simps_projections measurable_equiv
(to_equiv_to_fun → apply, to_equiv_inv_fun → symm_apply)
lemma to_equiv_injective : injective (to_equiv : (α ≃ᵐ β) → (α ≃ β)) :=
by { rintro ⟨e₁, _, _⟩ ⟨e₂, _, _⟩ (rfl : e₁ = e₂), refl }
@[ext] lemma ext {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵐ β} (h : (e₁ : α → β) = e₂) : e₁ = e₂ :=
to_equiv_injective $ equiv.coe_fn_injective h
@[simp] lemma symm_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h1 : measurable e) (h2 : measurable e.symm) :
(⟨e, h1, h2⟩ : α ≃ᵐ β).symm = ⟨e.symm, h2, h1⟩ := rfl
attribute [simps apply to_equiv] trans refl
@[simp] lemma symm_refl (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : (refl α).symm = refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_comp_self (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e.symm ∘ e = id := funext e.left_inv
@[simp] theorem self_comp_symm (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e ∘ e.symm = id := funext e.right_inv
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (y : β) : e (e.symm y) = y := e.right_inv y
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (x : α) : e.symm (e x) = x := e.left_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_self (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e.symm.trans e = refl β :=
ext e.self_comp_symm
@[simp] theorem self_trans_symm (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e.trans e.symm = refl α :=
ext e.symm_comp_self
protected theorem surjective (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : surjective e := e.to_equiv.surjective
protected theorem bijective (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : bijective e := e.to_equiv.bijective
protected theorem injective (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : injective e := e.to_equiv.injective
@[simp] theorem symm_preimage_preimage (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (s : set β) : e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.to_equiv.symm_preimage_preimage s
theorem image_eq_preimage (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (s : set α) : e '' s = e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
e.to_equiv.image_eq_preimage s
@[simp] theorem measurable_set_preimage (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {s : set β} :
measurable_set (e ⁻¹' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [symm_preimage_preimage] using e.symm.measurable h, λ h, e.measurable h⟩
@[simp] theorem measurable_set_image (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {s : set α} :
measurable_set (e '' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
by rw [image_eq_preimage, measurable_set_preimage]
/-- A measurable equivalence is a measurable embedding. -/
protected lemma measurable_embedding (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : measurable_embedding e :=
{ injective := e.injective,
measurable := e.measurable,
measurable_set_image' := λ s, e.measurable_set_image.2 }
/-- Equal measurable spaces are equivalent. -/
protected def cast {α β} [i₁ : measurable_space α] [i₂ : measurable_space β]
(h : α = β) (hi : i₁ == i₂) : α ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.cast h,
measurable_to_fun := by { substI h, substI hi, exact measurable_id },
measurable_inv_fun := by { substI h, substI hi, exact measurable_id }}
protected lemma measurable_comp_iff {f : β → γ} (e : α ≃ᵐ β) :
measurable (f ∘ e) ↔ measurable f :=
iff.intro
(assume hfe,
have measurable (f ∘ (e.symm.trans e).to_equiv) := hfe.comp e.symm.measurable,
by rwa [coe_to_equiv, symm_trans_self] at this)
(λ h, h.comp e.measurable)
/-- Any two types with unique elements are measurably equivalent. -/
def of_unique_of_unique (α β : Type*) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β]
[unique α] [unique β] : α ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_equiv := equiv_of_unique α β,
measurable_to_fun := subsingleton.measurable,
measurable_inv_fun := subsingleton.measurable }
/-- Products of equivalent measurable spaces are equivalent. -/
def prod_congr (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (cd : γ ≃ᵐ δ) : α × γ ≃ᵐ β × δ :=
{ to_equiv := prod_congr ab.to_equiv cd.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun := (ab.measurable_to_fun.comp measurable_id.fst).prod_mk
(cd.measurable_to_fun.comp measurable_id.snd),
measurable_inv_fun := (ab.measurable_inv_fun.comp measurable_id.fst).prod_mk
(cd.measurable_inv_fun.comp measurable_id.snd) }
/-- Products of measurable spaces are symmetric. -/
def prod_comm : α × β ≃ᵐ β × α :=
{ to_equiv := prod_comm α β,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.snd.prod_mk measurable_id.fst,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id.snd.prod_mk measurable_id.fst }
/-- Products of measurable spaces are associative. -/
def prod_assoc : (α × β) × γ ≃ᵐ α × (β × γ) :=
{ to_equiv := prod_assoc α β γ,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_fst.fst.prod_mk $ measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd,
measurable_inv_fun := (measurable_fst.prod_mk measurable_snd.fst).prod_mk measurable_snd.snd }
/-- Sums of measurable spaces are symmetric. -/
def sum_congr (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (cd : γ ≃ᵐ δ) : α ⊕ γ ≃ᵐ β ⊕ δ :=
{ to_equiv := sum_congr ab.to_equiv cd.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun :=
begin
cases ab with ab' abm, cases ab', cases cd with cd' cdm, cases cd',
refine measurable_sum (measurable_inl.comp abm) (measurable_inr.comp cdm)
end,
measurable_inv_fun :=
begin
cases ab with ab' _ abm, cases ab', cases cd with cd' _ cdm, cases cd',
refine measurable_sum (measurable_inl.comp abm) (measurable_inr.comp cdm)
end }
/-- `s ×ˢ t ≃ (s × t)` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.prod (s : set α) (t : set β) : ↥(s ×ˢ t) ≃ᵐ s × t :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.prod s t,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.subtype_coe.fst.subtype_mk.prod_mk
measurable_id.subtype_coe.snd.subtype_mk,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk $ measurable_id.fst.subtype_coe.prod_mk
measurable_id.snd.subtype_coe }
/-- `univ α ≃ α` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.univ (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : (univ : set α) ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.univ α,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.subtype_coe,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id.subtype_mk }
/-- `{a} ≃ unit` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.singleton (a : α) : ({a} : set α) ≃ᵐ unit :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.singleton a,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_const,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_const }
/-- `α` is equivalent to its image in `α ⊕ β` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.range_inl : (range sum.inl : set (α ⊕ β)) ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, match ab with
| ⟨sum.inl a, _⟩ := a
| ⟨sum.inr b, p⟩ := have false, by { cases p, contradiction }, this.elim
end,
inv_fun := λ a, ⟨sum.inl a, a, rfl⟩,
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨ab, a, rfl⟩, refl },
right_inv := assume a, rfl,
measurable_to_fun := assume s (hs : measurable_set s),
begin
refine ⟨_, hs.inl_image, set.ext _⟩,
rintros ⟨ab, a, rfl⟩,
simp [set.range_inl._match_1]
end,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk measurable_inl }
/-- `β` is equivalent to its image in `α ⊕ β` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.range_inr : (range sum.inr : set (α ⊕ β)) ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, match ab with
| ⟨sum.inr b, _⟩ := b
| ⟨sum.inl a, p⟩ := have false, by { cases p, contradiction }, this.elim
end,
inv_fun := λ b, ⟨sum.inr b, b, rfl⟩,
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨ab, b, rfl⟩, refl },
right_inv := assume b, rfl,
measurable_to_fun := assume s (hs : measurable_set s),
begin
refine ⟨_, measurable_set_inr_image hs, set.ext _⟩,
rintros ⟨ab, b, rfl⟩,
simp [set.range_inr._match_1]
end,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk measurable_inr }
/-- Products distribute over sums (on the right) as measurable spaces. -/
def sum_prod_distrib (α β γ) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] :
(α ⊕ β) × γ ≃ᵐ (α × γ) ⊕ (β × γ) :=
{ to_equiv := sum_prod_distrib α β γ,
measurable_to_fun :=
begin
refine measurable_of_measurable_union_cover
(range sum.inl ×ˢ (univ : set γ))
(range sum.inr ×ˢ (univ : set γ))
(measurable_set_range_inl.prod measurable_set.univ)
(measurable_set_range_inr.prod measurable_set.univ)
(by { rintro ⟨a|b, c⟩; simp [set.prod_eq] })
_
_,
{ refine (set.prod (range sum.inl) univ).symm.measurable_comp_iff.1 _,
refine (prod_congr set.range_inl (set.univ _)).symm.measurable_comp_iff.1 _,
dsimp [(∘)],
convert measurable_inl,
ext ⟨a, c⟩, refl },
{ refine (set.prod (range sum.inr) univ).symm.measurable_comp_iff.1 _,
refine (prod_congr set.range_inr (set.univ _)).symm.measurable_comp_iff.1 _,
dsimp [(∘)],
convert measurable_inr,
ext ⟨b, c⟩, refl }
end,
measurable_inv_fun :=
measurable_sum
((measurable_inl.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_snd)
((measurable_inr.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_snd) }
/-- Products distribute over sums (on the left) as measurable spaces. -/
def prod_sum_distrib (α β γ) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] :
α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ᵐ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ) :=
prod_comm.trans $ (sum_prod_distrib _ _ _).trans $ sum_congr prod_comm prod_comm
/-- Products distribute over sums as measurable spaces. -/
def sum_prod_sum (α β γ δ)
[measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] [measurable_space δ] :
(α ⊕ β) × (γ ⊕ δ) ≃ᵐ ((α × γ) ⊕ (α × δ)) ⊕ ((β × γ) ⊕ (β × δ)) :=
(sum_prod_distrib _ _ _).trans $ sum_congr (prod_sum_distrib _ _ _) (prod_sum_distrib _ _ _)
variables {π π' : δ' → Type*} [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)] [∀ x, measurable_space (π' x)]
/-- A family of measurable equivalences `Π a, β₁ a ≃ᵐ β₂ a` generates a measurable equivalence
between `Π a, β₁ a` and `Π a, β₂ a`. -/
def Pi_congr_right (e : Π a, π a ≃ᵐ π' a) : (Π a, π a) ≃ᵐ (Π a, π' a) :=
{ to_equiv := Pi_congr_right (λ a, (e a).to_equiv),
measurable_to_fun :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, (e i).measurable_to_fun.comp (measurable_pi_apply i)),
measurable_inv_fun :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, (e i).measurable_inv_fun.comp (measurable_pi_apply i)) }
/-- Pi-types are measurably equivalent to iterated products. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def pi_measurable_equiv_tprod [decidable_eq δ']
{l : list δ'} (hnd : l.nodup) (h : ∀ i, i ∈ l) :
(Π i, π i) ≃ᵐ list.tprod π l :=
{ to_equiv := list.tprod.pi_equiv_tprod hnd h,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_tprod_mk l,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_tprod_elim' h }
/-- If `α` has a unique term, then the type of function `α → β` is measurably equivalent to `β`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}] def fun_unique (α β : Type*) [unique α] [measurable_space β] :
(α → β) ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.fun_unique α β,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_pi_apply _,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_pi_iff.2 $ λ b, measurable_id }
/-- The space `Π i : fin 2, α i` is measurably equivalent to `α 0 × α 1`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}] def pi_fin_two (α : fin 2 → Type*) [∀ i, measurable_space (α i)] :
(Π i, α i) ≃ᵐ α 0 × α 1 :=
{ to_equiv := pi_fin_two_equiv α,
measurable_to_fun := measurable.prod (measurable_pi_apply _) (measurable_pi_apply _),
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_pi_iff.2 $
fin.forall_fin_two.2 ⟨measurable_fst, measurable_snd⟩ }
/-- The space `fin 2 → α` is measurably equivalent to `α × α`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}] def fin_two_arrow : (fin 2 → α) ≃ᵐ α × α := pi_fin_two (λ _, α)
/-- Measurable equivalence between `Π j : fin (n + 1), α j` and
`α i × Π j : fin n, α (fin.succ_above i j)`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def pi_fin_succ_above_equiv {n : ℕ} (α : fin (n + 1) → Type*) [Π i, measurable_space (α i)]
(i : fin (n + 1)) :
(Π j, α j) ≃ᵐ α i × (Π j, α (i.succ_above j)) :=
{ to_equiv := pi_fin_succ_above_equiv α i,
measurable_to_fun := (measurable_pi_apply i).prod_mk $ measurable_pi_iff.2 $
λ j, measurable_pi_apply _,
measurable_inv_fun := by simp [measurable_pi_iff, i.forall_iff_succ_above, measurable_fst,
(measurable_pi_apply _).comp measurable_snd] }
variable (π)
/-- Measurable equivalence between (dependent) functions on a type and pairs of functions on
`{i // p i}` and `{i // ¬p i}`. See also `equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod (p : δ' → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
(Π i, π i) ≃ᵐ ((Π i : subtype p, π i) × (Π i : {i // ¬p i}, π i)) :=
{ to_equiv := pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod p π,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod π p,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm π p }
/-- If `s` is a measurable set in a measurable space, that space is equivalent
to the sum of `s` and `sᶜ`.-/
def sum_compl {s : set α} [decidable_pred s] (hs : measurable_set s) : s ⊕ (sᶜ : set α) ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := sum_compl s,
measurable_to_fun := by {apply measurable.sum_elim; exact measurable_subtype_coe},
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.dite measurable_inl measurable_inr hs }
end measurable_equiv
namespace measurable_embedding
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
/-- A set is equivalent to its image under a function `f` as measurable spaces,
if `f` is a measurable embedding -/
noncomputable def equiv_image (s : set α) (hf : measurable_embedding f) :
s ≃ᵐ (f '' s) :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.image f s hf.injective,
measurable_to_fun := (hf.measurable.comp measurable_id.subtype_coe).subtype_mk,
measurable_inv_fun :=
begin
rintro t ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩, simp [preimage_preimage, set.image_symm_preimage hf.injective],
exact measurable_subtype_coe (hf.measurable_set_image' hu)
end }
/-- The domain of `f` is equivalent to its range as measurable spaces,
if `f` is a measurable embedding -/
noncomputable def equiv_range (hf : measurable_embedding f) : α ≃ᵐ (range f) :=
(measurable_equiv.set.univ _).symm.trans $
(hf.equiv_image univ).trans $
measurable_equiv.cast (by rw image_univ) (by rw image_univ)
lemma of_measurable_inverse_on_range {g : range f → α} (hf₁ : measurable f)
(hf₂ : measurable_set (range f)) (hg : measurable g)
(H : left_inverse g (range_factorization f)) : measurable_embedding f :=
begin
set e : α ≃ᵐ range f :=
⟨⟨range_factorization f, g, H, H.right_inverse_of_surjective surjective_onto_range⟩,
hf₁.subtype_mk, hg⟩,
exact (measurable_embedding.subtype_coe hf₂).comp e.measurable_embedding
end
lemma of_measurable_inverse (hf₁ : measurable f)
(hf₂ : measurable_set (range f)) (hg : measurable g)
(H : left_inverse g f) : measurable_embedding f :=
of_measurable_inverse_on_range hf₁ hf₂ (hg.comp measurable_subtype_coe) H
open_locale classical
/-- The **`measurable Schröder-Bernstein Theorem**: Given measurable embeddings
`α → β` and `β → α`, we can find a measurable equivalence `α ≃ᵐ β`.-/
noncomputable
def schroeder_bernstein {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(hf : measurable_embedding f)(hg : measurable_embedding g) : α ≃ᵐ β :=
begin
let F : set α → set α := λ A, (g '' (f '' A)ᶜ)ᶜ,
-- We follow the proof of the usual SB theorem in mathlib,
-- the crux of which is finding a fixed point of this F.
-- However, we must find this fixed point manually instead of invoking Knaster-Tarski
-- in order to make sure it is measurable.
suffices : Σ' A : set α, measurable_set A ∧ F A = A,
{ rcases this with ⟨A, Ameas, Afp⟩,
let B := f '' A,
have Bmeas : measurable_set B := hf.measurable_set_image' Ameas,
refine (measurable_equiv.sum_compl Ameas).symm.trans
(measurable_equiv.trans _ (measurable_equiv.sum_compl Bmeas)),
apply measurable_equiv.sum_congr (hf.equiv_image _),
have : Aᶜ = g '' Bᶜ,
{ apply compl_injective,
rw ← Afp,
simp, },
rw this,
exact (hg.equiv_image _).symm, },
have Fmono : ∀ {A B}, A ⊆ B → F A ⊆ F B := λ A B hAB,
compl_subset_compl.mpr $ set.image_subset _ $
compl_subset_compl.mpr $ set.image_subset _ hAB,
let X : ℕ → set α := λ n, F^[n] univ,
refine ⟨Inter X, _, _⟩,
{ apply measurable_set.Inter,
intros n,
induction n with n ih,
{ exact measurable_set.univ },
rw [function.iterate_succ', function.comp_apply],
exact (hg.measurable_set_image' (hf.measurable_set_image' ih).compl).compl, },
apply subset_antisymm,
{ apply subset_Inter,
intros n,
cases n,
{ exact subset_univ _ },
rw [function.iterate_succ', function.comp_apply],
exact Fmono (Inter_subset _ _ ), },
rintros x hx ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩,
rw mem_Inter at hx,
apply hy,
rw (inj_on_of_injective hf.injective _).image_Inter_eq,
swap, { apply_instance },
rw mem_Inter,
intro n,
specialize hx n.succ,
rw [function.iterate_succ', function.comp_apply] at hx,
by_contradiction h,
apply hx,
exact ⟨y, h, rfl⟩,
end
end measurable_embedding
namespace filter
variables [measurable_space α]
/-- A filter `f` is measurably generates if each `s ∈ f` includes a measurable `t ∈ f`. -/
class is_measurably_generated (f : filter α) : Prop :=
(exists_measurable_subset : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∃ t ∈ f, measurable_set t ∧ t ⊆ s)
instance is_measurably_generated_bot : is_measurably_generated (⊥ : filter α) :=
⟨λ _ _, ⟨∅, mem_bot, measurable_set.empty, empty_subset _⟩⟩
instance is_measurably_generated_top : is_measurably_generated (⊤ : filter α) :=
⟨λ s hs, ⟨univ, univ_mem, measurable_set.univ, λ x _, hs x⟩⟩
lemma eventually.exists_measurable_mem {f : filter α} [is_measurably_generated f]
{p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ s ∈ f, measurable_set s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset h
lemma eventually.exists_measurable_mem_of_small_sets {f : filter α} [is_measurably_generated f]
{p : set α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ s in f.small_sets, p s) :
∃ s ∈ f, measurable_set s ∧ p s :=
let ⟨s, hsf, hs⟩ := eventually_small_sets.1 h,
⟨t, htf, htm, hts⟩ := is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsf
in ⟨t, htf, htm, hs t hts⟩
instance inf_is_measurably_generated (f g : filter α) [is_measurably_generated f]
[is_measurably_generated g] :
is_measurably_generated (f ⊓ g) :=
begin
refine ⟨_⟩,
rintros t ⟨sf, hsf, sg, hsg, rfl⟩,
rcases is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsf with ⟨s'f, hs'f, hmf, hs'sf⟩,
rcases is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsg with ⟨s'g, hs'g, hmg, hs'sg⟩,
refine ⟨s'f ∩ s'g, inter_mem_inf hs'f hs'g, hmf.inter hmg, _⟩,
exact inter_subset_inter hs'sf hs'sg
end
lemma principal_is_measurably_generated_iff {s : set α} :
is_measurably_generated (𝓟 s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ hs, ⟨λ t ht, ⟨s, mem_principal_self s, hs, ht⟩⟩⟩,
rintros ⟨hs⟩,
rcases hs (mem_principal_self s) with ⟨t, ht, htm, hts⟩,
have : t = s := subset.antisymm hts ht,
rwa ← this
end
alias principal_is_measurably_generated_iff ↔
_ _root_.measurable_set.principal_is_measurably_generated
instance infi_is_measurably_generated {f : ι → filter α} [∀ i, is_measurably_generated (f i)] :
is_measurably_generated (⨅ i, f i) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ s hs, _⟩,
rw [← equiv.plift.surjective.infi_comp, mem_infi] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨t, ht, ⟨V, hVf, rfl⟩⟩,
choose U hUf hU using λ i, is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset (hVf i),
refine ⟨⋂ i : t, U i, _, _, _⟩,
{ rw [← equiv.plift.surjective.infi_comp, mem_infi],
refine ⟨t, ht, U, hUf, rfl⟩ },
{ haveI := ht.countable.to_encodable,
exact measurable_set.Inter (λ i, (hU i).1) },
{ exact Inter_mono (λ i, (hU i).2) }
end
end filter
/-- We say that a collection of sets is countably spanning if a countable subset spans the
whole type. This is a useful condition in various parts of measure theory. For example, it is
a needed condition to show that the product of two collections generate the product sigma algebra,
see `generate_from_prod_eq`. -/
def is_countably_spanning (C : set (set α)) : Prop :=
∃ (s : ℕ → set α), (∀ n, s n ∈ C) ∧ (⋃ n, s n) = univ
lemma is_countably_spanning_measurable_set [measurable_space α] :
is_countably_spanning {s : set α | measurable_set s} :=
⟨λ _, univ, λ _, measurable_set.univ, Union_const _⟩
namespace measurable_set
/-!
### Typeclasses on `subtype measurable_set`
-/
variables [measurable_space α]
instance : has_mem α (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ a s, a ∈ (s : set α)⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_coe (a : α) (s : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
a ∈ (s : set α) ↔ a ∈ s := iff.rfl
instance : has_emptyc (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨⟨∅, measurable_set.empty⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_empty : ↑(∅ : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) = (∅ : set α) := rfl
instance [measurable_singleton_class α] : has_insert α (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ a s, ⟨has_insert.insert a s, s.prop.insert a⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_insert [measurable_singleton_class α] (a : α)
(s : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
↑(has_insert.insert a s) = (has_insert.insert a s : set α) := rfl
instance : has_compl (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ x, ⟨xᶜ, x.prop.compl⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_compl (s : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) : ↑(sᶜ) = (sᶜ : set α) := rfl
instance : has_union (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ x y, ⟨x ∪ y, x.prop.union y.prop⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_union (s t : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
↑(s ∪ t) = (s ∪ t : set α) := rfl
instance : has_inter (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ x y, ⟨x ∩ y, x.prop.inter y.prop⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_inter (s t : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
↑(s ∩ t) = (s ∩ t : set α) := rfl
instance : has_sdiff (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ x y, ⟨x \ y, x.prop.diff y.prop⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_sdiff (s t : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
↑(s \ t) = (s \ t : set α) := rfl
instance : has_bot (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨⟨⊥, measurable_set.empty⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_bot : ↑(⊥ : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) = (⊥ : set α) := rfl
instance : has_top (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨⟨⊤, measurable_set.univ⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_top : ↑(⊤ : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) = (⊤ : set α) := rfl
instance : partial_order (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
partial_order.lift _ subtype.coe_injective
instance : distrib_lattice (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
{ sup := (∪),
le_sup_left := λ a b, show (a : set α) ≤ a ⊔ b, from le_sup_left,
le_sup_right := λ a b, show (b : set α) ≤ a ⊔ b, from le_sup_right,
sup_le := λ a b c ha hb, show (a ⊔ b : set α) ≤ c, from sup_le ha hb,
inf := (∩),
inf_le_left := λ a b, show (a ⊓ b : set α) ≤ a, from inf_le_left,
inf_le_right := λ a b, show (a ⊓ b : set α) ≤ b, from inf_le_right,
le_inf := λ a b c ha hb, show (a : set α) ≤ b ⊓ c, from le_inf ha hb,
le_sup_inf := λ x y z, show ((x ⊔ y) ⊓ (x ⊔ z) : set α) ≤ x ⊔ y ⊓ z, from le_sup_inf,
.. measurable_set.subtype.partial_order }
instance : bounded_order (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
{ top := ⊤,
le_top := λ a, show (a : set α) ≤ ⊤, from le_top,
bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ a, show (⊥ : set α) ≤ a, from bot_le }
instance : boolean_algebra (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
{ sdiff := (\),
compl := has_compl.compl,
inf_compl_le_bot := λ a, boolean_algebra.inf_compl_le_bot (a : set α),
top_le_sup_compl := λ a, boolean_algebra.top_le_sup_compl (a : set α),
sdiff_eq := λ a b, subtype.eq $ sdiff_eq,
.. measurable_set.subtype.bounded_order,
.. measurable_set.subtype.distrib_lattice }
@[measurability] lemma measurable_set_blimsup {s : ℕ → set α} {p : ℕ → Prop}
(h : ∀ n, p n → measurable_set (s n)) :
measurable_set $ filter.blimsup s filter.at_top p :=
begin
simp only [filter.blimsup_eq_infi_bsupr_of_nat, supr_eq_Union, infi_eq_Inter],
exact measurable_set.Inter
(λ n, measurable_set.Union (λ m, measurable_set.Union $ λ hm, h m hm.1)),
end
@[measurability] lemma measurable_set_bliminf {s : ℕ → set α} {p : ℕ → Prop}
(h : ∀ n, p n → measurable_set (s n)) :
measurable_set $ filter.bliminf s filter.at_top p :=
begin
simp only [filter.bliminf_eq_supr_binfi_of_nat, infi_eq_Inter, supr_eq_Union],
exact measurable_set.Union
(λ n, measurable_set.Inter (λ m, measurable_set.Inter $ λ hm, h m hm.1)),
end
@[measurability] lemma measurable_set_limsup {s : ℕ → set α} (hs : ∀ n, measurable_set $ s n) :
measurable_set $ filter.limsup s filter.at_top :=
begin
convert measurable_set_blimsup (λ n h, hs n : ∀ n, true → measurable_set (s n)),
simp,
end
@[measurability] lemma measurable_set_liminf {s : ℕ → set α} (hs : ∀ n, measurable_set $ s n) :
measurable_set $ filter.liminf s filter.at_top :=
begin
convert measurable_set_bliminf (λ n h, hs n : ∀ n, true → measurable_set (s n)),
simp,
end
end measurable_set
|
6d056385e3159da507cabae5d8288ffc06ed94dc | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/data/dfinsupp.lean | a2a72ccd91e4fec26c30ea5431ac1681c2ac8d12 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 55,077 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.module.pi
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import data.set.finite
import group_theory.submonoid.membership
/-!
# Dependent functions with finite support
For a non-dependent version see `data/finsupp.lean`.
-/
universes u u₁ u₂ v v₁ v₂ v₃ w x y l
open_locale big_operators
variables (ι : Type u) (β : ι → Type v) {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
namespace dfinsupp
variable [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
/-- An auxiliary structure used in the definition of of `dfinsupp`,
the type used to make infinite direct sum of modules over a ring. -/
structure pre : Type (max u v) :=
(to_fun : Π i, β i)
(pre_support : multiset ι)
(zero : ∀ i, i ∈ pre_support ∨ to_fun i = 0)
instance inhabited_pre : inhabited (pre ι β) :=
⟨⟨λ i, 0, ∅, λ i, or.inr rfl⟩⟩
instance : setoid (pre ι β) :=
{ r := λ x y, ∀ i, x.to_fun i = y.to_fun i,
iseqv := ⟨λ f i, rfl, λ f g H i, (H i).symm,
λ f g h H1 H2 i, (H1 i).trans (H2 i)⟩ }
end dfinsupp
variable {ι}
/-- A dependent function `Π i, β i` with finite support. -/
@[reducible]
def dfinsupp [Π i, has_zero (β i)] : Type* :=
quotient (dfinsupp.pre.setoid ι β)
variable {β}
notation `Π₀` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, dfinsupp f) := r
infix ` →ₚ `:25 := dfinsupp
namespace dfinsupp
section basic
variables [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i, has_zero (β₁ i)] [Π i, has_zero (β₂ i)]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨λ _, Π i, β i, λ f, quotient.lift_on f pre.to_fun $ λ _ _, funext⟩
instance : has_zero (Π₀ i, β i) := ⟨⟦⟨0, ∅, λ i, or.inr rfl⟩⟧⟩
instance : inhabited (Π₀ i, β i) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp]
lemma coe_pre_mk (f : Π i, β i) (s : multiset ι) (hf) :
⇑(⟦⟨f, s, hf⟩⟧ : Π₀ i, β i) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 := rfl
lemma zero_apply (i : ι) : (0 : Π₀ i, β i) i = 0 := rfl
lemma coe_fn_injective : @function.injective (Π₀ i, β i) (Π i, β i) coe_fn :=
λ f g H, quotient.induction_on₂ f g (λ _ _ H, quotient.sound H) (congr_fun H)
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : Π₀ i, β i} (H : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
coe_fn_injective (funext H)
lemma ext_iff {f g : Π₀ i, β i} : f = g ↔ ∀ i, f i = g i :=
coe_fn_injective.eq_iff.symm.trans function.funext_iff
/-- The composition of `f : β₁ → β₂` and `g : Π₀ i, β₁ i` is
`map_range f hf g : Π₀ i, β₂ i`, well defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled:
* `dfinsupp.map_range.add_monoid_hom`
* `dfinsupp.map_range.add_equiv`
* `dfinsupp.map_range.linear_map`
* `dfinsupp.map_range.linear_equiv`
-/
def map_range (f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i, β₁ i) : Π₀ i, β₂ i :=
quotient.lift_on g (λ x, ⟦(⟨λ i, f i (x.1 i), x.2,
λ i, or.cases_on (x.3 i) or.inl $ λ H, or.inr $ by rw [H, hf]⟩ : pre ι β₂)⟧) $ λ x y H,
quotient.sound $ λ i, by simp only [H i]
@[simp] lemma map_range_apply
(f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (i : ι) :
map_range f hf g i = f i (g i) :=
quotient.induction_on g $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma map_range_id (h : ∀ i, id (0 : β₁ i) = 0 := λ i, rfl) (g : Π₀ (i : ι), β₁ i) :
map_range (λ i, (id : β₁ i → β₁ i)) h g = g :=
by { ext, simp only [map_range_apply, id.def] }
lemma map_range_comp (f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (f₂ : Π i, β i → β₁ i)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (hf₂ : ∀ i, f₂ i 0 = 0) (h : ∀ i, (f i ∘ f₂ i) 0 = 0)
(g : Π₀ (i : ι), β i) :
map_range (λ i, f i ∘ f₂ i) h g = map_range f hf (map_range f₂ hf₂ g) :=
by { ext, simp only [map_range_apply] }
@[simp] lemma map_range_zero (f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) :
map_range f hf (0 : Π₀ i, β₁ i) = 0 :=
by { ext, simp only [map_range_apply, coe_zero, pi.zero_apply, hf] }
/-- Let `f i` be a binary operation `β₁ i → β₂ i → β i` such that `f i 0 0 = 0`.
Then `zip_with f hf` is a binary operation `Π₀ i, β₁ i → Π₀ i, β₂ i → Π₀ i, β i`. -/
def zip_with (f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0)
(g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i) : (Π₀ i, β i) :=
begin
refine quotient.lift_on₂ g₁ g₂ (λ x y, ⟦(⟨λ i, f i (x.1 i) (y.1 i), x.2 + y.2,
λ i, _⟩ : pre ι β)⟧) _,
{ cases x.3 i with h1 h1,
{ left, rw multiset.mem_add, left, exact h1 },
cases y.3 i with h2 h2,
{ left, rw multiset.mem_add, right, exact h2 },
right, rw [h1, h2, hf] },
exact λ x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ H1 H2, quotient.sound $ λ i, by simp only [H1 i, H2 i]
end
@[simp] lemma zip_with_apply
(f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i) (i : ι) :
zip_with f hf g₁ g₂ i = f i (g₁ i) (g₂ i) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ g₁ g₂ $ λ _ _, rfl
end basic
section algebra
instance [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] : has_add (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨zip_with (λ _, (+)) (λ _, add_zero 0)⟩
lemma add_apply [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) :
(g₁ + g₂) i = g₁ i + g₂ i :=
zip_with_apply _ _ g₁ g₂ i
@[simp] lemma coe_add [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) :
⇑(g₁ + g₂) = g₁ + g₂ :=
funext $ add_apply g₁ g₂
instance [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] : add_zero_class (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
zero_add := λ f, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, zero_apply, zero_add],
add_zero := λ f, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, zero_apply, add_zero] }
instance [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] : add_monoid (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ add_monoid .
zero := 0,
add := (+),
add_assoc := λ f g h, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, add_assoc],
.. dfinsupp.add_zero_class }
/-- Coercion from a `dfinsupp` to a pi type is an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
def coe_fn_add_monoid_hom [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ (Π i, β i) :=
{ to_fun := coe_fn, map_zero' := coe_zero, map_add' := coe_add }
/-- Evaluation at a point is an `add_monoid_hom`. This is the finitely-supported version of
`pi.eval_add_monoid_hom`. -/
def eval_add_monoid_hom [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] (i : ι) : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ β i :=
(pi.eval_add_monoid_hom β i).comp coe_fn_add_monoid_hom
instance [Π i, add_group (β i)] : has_neg (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨λ f, f.map_range (λ _, has_neg.neg) (λ _, neg_zero)⟩
instance [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] : add_comm_monoid (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ add_comm := λ f g, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, add_comm],
.. dfinsupp.add_monoid }
@[simp] lemma coe_finset_sum {α} [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] (s : finset α) (g : α → Π₀ i, β i) :
⇑(∑ a in s, g a) = ∑ a in s, g a :=
(coe_fn_add_monoid_hom : _ →+ (Π i, β i)).map_sum g s
@[simp] lemma finset_sum_apply {α} [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] (s : finset α) (g : α → Π₀ i, β i)
(i : ι) :
(∑ a in s, g a) i = ∑ a in s, g a i :=
(eval_add_monoid_hom i : _ →+ β i).map_sum g s
lemma neg_apply [Π i, add_group (β i)] (g : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) : (- g) i = - g i :=
map_range_apply _ _ g i
@[simp] lemma coe_neg [Π i, add_group (β i)] (g : Π₀ i, β i) : ⇑(- g) = - g :=
funext $ neg_apply g
instance [Π i, add_group (β i)] : add_group (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ add_left_neg := λ f, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, neg_apply, zero_apply, add_left_neg],
.. dfinsupp.add_monoid,
.. (infer_instance : has_neg (Π₀ i, β i)) }
lemma sub_apply [Π i, add_group (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) :
(g₁ - g₂) i = g₁ i - g₂ i :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma coe_sub [Π i, add_group (β i)] (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i) :
⇑(g₁ - g₂) = g₁ - g₂ :=
funext $ sub_apply g₁ g₂
instance [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)] : add_comm_group (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ add_comm := λ f g, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, add_comm],
..dfinsupp.add_group }
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a semiring action from an action on each
coordinate. -/
instance {γ : Type w} [monoid γ] [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] [Π i, distrib_mul_action γ (β i)] :
has_scalar γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨λc v, v.map_range (λ _, (•) c) (λ _, smul_zero _)⟩
lemma smul_apply {γ : Type w} [monoid γ] [Π i, add_monoid (β i)]
[Π i, distrib_mul_action γ (β i)] (b : γ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) (i : ι) :
(b • v) i = b • (v i) :=
map_range_apply _ _ v i
@[simp] lemma coe_smul {γ : Type w} [monoid γ] [Π i, add_monoid (β i)]
[Π i, distrib_mul_action γ (β i)] (b : γ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) :
⇑(b • v) = b • v :=
funext $ smul_apply b v
instance {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} [monoid γ] [monoid δ]
[Π i, add_monoid (β i)] [Π i, distrib_mul_action γ (β i)] [Π i, distrib_mul_action δ (β i)]
[Π i, smul_comm_class γ δ (β i)] :
smul_comm_class γ δ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ smul_comm := λ r s m, ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, smul_comm r s (m i)] }
instance {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} [monoid γ] [monoid δ]
[Π i, add_monoid (β i)] [Π i, distrib_mul_action γ (β i)] [Π i, distrib_mul_action δ (β i)]
[has_scalar γ δ] [Π i, is_scalar_tower γ δ (β i)] :
is_scalar_tower γ δ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ smul_assoc := λ r s m, ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, smul_assoc r s (m i)] }
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a `distrib_mul_action` structure from such a
structure on each coordinate. -/
instance {γ : Type w} [monoid γ] [Π i, add_monoid (β i)] [Π i, distrib_mul_action γ (β i)] :
distrib_mul_action γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ smul_zero := λ c, ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, smul_zero, zero_apply],
smul_add := λ c x y, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, smul_add],
one_smul := λ x, ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, one_smul],
mul_smul := λ r s x, ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, smul_smul],
..dfinsupp.has_scalar }
/-- Dependent functions with finite support inherit a module structure from such a structure on
each coordinate. -/
instance {γ : Type w} [semiring γ] [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i, module γ (β i)] :
module γ (Π₀ i, β i) :=
{ zero_smul := λ c, ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, zero_smul, zero_apply],
add_smul := λ c x y, ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, add_smul],
..dfinsupp.distrib_mul_action }
end algebra
section filter_and_subtype_domain
/-- `filter p f` is the function which is `f i` if `p i` is true and 0 otherwise. -/
def filter [Π i, has_zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
quotient.lift_on f (λ x, ⟦(⟨λ i, if p i then x.1 i else 0, x.2,
λ i, or.cases_on (x.3 i) or.inl $ λ H, or.inr $ by rw [H, if_t_t]⟩ : pre ι β)⟧) $ λ x y H,
quotient.sound $ λ i, by simp only [H i]
@[simp] lemma filter_apply [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
(p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.filter p i = if p i then f i else 0 :=
quotient.induction_on f $ λ x, rfl
lemma filter_apply_pos [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) {i : ι} (h : p i) :
f.filter p i = f i :=
by simp only [filter_apply, if_pos h]
lemma filter_apply_neg [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (f : Π₀ i, β i) {i : ι} (h : ¬ p i) :
f.filter p i = 0 :=
by simp only [filter_apply, if_neg h]
lemma filter_pos_add_filter_neg [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] (f : Π₀ i, β i)
(p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
f.filter p + f.filter (λi, ¬ p i) = f :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, filter_apply]; split_ifs; simp only [add_zero, zero_add]
/-- `subtype_domain p f` is the restriction of the finitely supported function
`f` to the subtype `p`. -/
def subtype_domain [Π i, has_zero (β i)] (p : ι → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) : Π₀ i : subtype p, β i :=
begin
fapply quotient.lift_on f,
{ intro x,
refine ⟦⟨λ i, x.1 (i : ι),
(x.2.filter p).attach.map $ λ j, ⟨j, (multiset.mem_filter.1 j.2).2⟩, _⟩⟧,
refine λ i, or.cases_on (x.3 i) (λ H, _) or.inr,
left, rw multiset.mem_map, refine ⟨⟨i, multiset.mem_filter.2 ⟨H, i.2⟩⟩, _, subtype.eta _ _⟩,
apply multiset.mem_attach },
intros x y H,
exact quotient.sound (λ i, H i)
end
@[simp] lemma subtype_domain_zero [Π i, has_zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
subtype_domain p (0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_domain_apply [Π i, has_zero (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{i : subtype p} {v : Π₀ i, β i} :
(subtype_domain p v) i = v i :=
quotient.induction_on v $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_domain_add [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{v v' : Π₀ i, β i} :
(v + v').subtype_domain p = v.subtype_domain p + v'.subtype_domain p :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, subtype_domain_apply]
/-- `subtype_domain` but as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps] def subtype_domain_add_monoid_hom [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] : (Π₀ i : ι, β i) →+ Π₀ i : subtype p, β i :=
{ to_fun := subtype_domain p,
map_zero' := subtype_domain_zero,
map_add' := λ _ _, subtype_domain_add }
@[simp]
lemma subtype_domain_neg [Π i, add_group (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {v : Π₀ i, β i} :
(- v).subtype_domain p = - v.subtype_domain p :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [neg_apply, subtype_domain_apply]
@[simp] lemma subtype_domain_sub [Π i, add_group (β i)] {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{v v' : Π₀ i, β i} :
(v - v').subtype_domain p = v.subtype_domain p - v'.subtype_domain p :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [sub_apply, subtype_domain_apply]
end filter_and_subtype_domain
variable [dec : decidable_eq ι]
include dec
section basic
variable [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
omit dec
lemma finite_support (f : Π₀ i, β i) : set.finite {i | f i ≠ 0} :=
begin
classical,
exact quotient.induction_on f (λ x, x.2.to_finset.finite_to_set.subset (λ i H,
multiset.mem_to_finset.2 ((x.3 i).resolve_right H)))
end
include dec
/-- Create an element of `Π₀ i, β i` from a finset `s` and a function `x`
defined on this `finset`. -/
def mk (s : finset ι) (x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β (i : ι)) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟦⟨λ i, if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0, s.1,
λ i, if H : i ∈ s then or.inl H else or.inr $ dif_neg H⟩⟧
@[simp] lemma mk_apply {s : finset ι} {x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i} {i : ι} :
(mk s x : Π i, β i) i = if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0 :=
rfl
theorem mk_injective (s : finset ι) : function.injective (@mk ι β _ _ s) :=
begin
intros x y H,
ext i,
have h1 : (mk s x : Π i, β i) i = (mk s y : Π i, β i) i, {rw H},
cases i with i hi,
change i ∈ s at hi,
dsimp only [mk_apply, subtype.coe_mk] at h1,
simpa only [dif_pos hi] using h1
end
/-- The function `single i b : Π₀ i, β i` sends `i` to `b`
and all other points to `0`. -/
def single (i : ι) (b : β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
mk {i} $ λ j, eq.rec_on (finset.mem_singleton.1 j.prop).symm b
@[simp] lemma single_apply {i i' b} :
(single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = (if h : i = i' then eq.rec_on h b else 0) :=
begin
dsimp only [single],
by_cases h : i = i',
{ have h1 : i' ∈ ({i} : finset ι) := finset.mem_singleton.2 h.symm,
simp only [mk_apply, dif_pos h, dif_pos h1], refl },
{ have h1 : i' ∉ ({i} : finset ι) := finset.not_mem_singleton.2 (ne.symm h),
simp only [mk_apply, dif_neg h, dif_neg h1] }
end
@[simp] lemma single_zero (i) : (single i 0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
quotient.sound $ λ j, if H : j ∈ ({i} : finset _)
then by dsimp only; rw [dif_pos H]; cases finset.mem_singleton.1 H; refl
else dif_neg H
@[simp] lemma single_eq_same {i b} : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i = b :=
by simp only [single_apply, dif_pos rfl]
lemma single_eq_of_ne {i i' b} (h : i ≠ i') : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = 0 :=
by simp only [single_apply, dif_neg h]
lemma single_injective {i} : function.injective (single i : β i → Π₀ i, β i) :=
λ x y H, congr_fun (mk_injective _ H) ⟨i, by simp⟩
/-- Like `finsupp.single_eq_single_iff`, but with a `heq` due to dependent types -/
lemma single_eq_single_iff (i j : ι) (xi : β i) (xj : β j) :
dfinsupp.single i xi = dfinsupp.single j xj ↔ i = j ∧ xi == xj ∨ xi = 0 ∧ xj = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
by_cases hij : i = j,
{ subst hij,
exact or.inl ⟨rfl, heq_of_eq (dfinsupp.single_injective h)⟩, },
{ have h_coe : ⇑(dfinsupp.single i xi) = dfinsupp.single j xj := congr_arg coe_fn h,
have hci := congr_fun h_coe i,
have hcj := congr_fun h_coe j,
rw dfinsupp.single_eq_same at hci hcj,
rw dfinsupp.single_eq_of_ne (ne.symm hij) at hci,
rw dfinsupp.single_eq_of_ne (hij) at hcj,
exact or.inr ⟨hci, hcj.symm⟩, }, },
{ rintros (⟨hi, hxi⟩ | ⟨hi, hj⟩),
{ subst hi,
rw eq_of_heq hxi, },
{ rw [hi, hj, dfinsupp.single_zero, dfinsupp.single_zero], }, },
end
@[simp] lemma single_eq_zero {i : ι} {xi : β i} : single i xi = 0 ↔ xi = 0 :=
begin
rw [←single_zero i, single_eq_single_iff],
simp,
end
/-- Equality of sigma types is sufficient (but not necessary) to show equality of `dfinsupp`s. -/
lemma single_eq_of_sigma_eq
{i j} {xi : β i} {xj : β j} (h : (⟨i, xi⟩ : sigma β) = ⟨j, xj⟩) :
dfinsupp.single i xi = dfinsupp.single j xj :=
by { cases h, refl }
/-- Redefine `f i` to be `0`. -/
def erase (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
quotient.lift_on f (λ x, ⟦(⟨λ j, if j = i then 0 else x.1 j, x.2,
λ j, or.cases_on (x.3 j) or.inl $ λ H, or.inr $ by simp only [H, if_t_t]⟩ : pre ι β)⟧) $ λ x y H,
quotient.sound $ λ j, if h : j = i then by simp only [if_pos h]
else by simp only [if_neg h, H j]
@[simp] lemma erase_apply {i j : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
(f.erase i) j = if j = i then 0 else f j :=
quotient.induction_on f $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma erase_same {i : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} : (f.erase i) i = 0 :=
by simp
lemma erase_ne {i i' : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} (h : i' ≠ i) : (f.erase i) i' = f i' :=
by simp [h]
end basic
section add_monoid
variable [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)]
@[simp] lemma single_add (i : ι) (b₁ b₂ : β i) : single i (b₁ + b₂) = single i b₁ + single i b₂ :=
ext $ assume i',
begin
by_cases h : i = i',
{ subst h, simp only [add_apply, single_eq_same] },
{ simp only [add_apply, single_eq_of_ne h, zero_add] }
end
variables (β)
/-- `dfinsupp.single` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps] def single_add_hom (i : ι) : β i →+ Π₀ i, β i :=
{ to_fun := single i, map_zero' := single_zero i, map_add' := single_add i }
variables {β}
lemma single_add_erase {i : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} : single i (f i) + f.erase i = f :=
ext $ λ i',
if h : i = i'
then by subst h; simp only [add_apply, single_apply, erase_apply, dif_pos rfl, if_pos, add_zero]
else by simp only [add_apply, single_apply, erase_apply, dif_neg h, if_neg (ne.symm h), zero_add]
lemma erase_add_single {i : ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} : f.erase i + single i (f i) = f :=
ext $ λ i',
if h : i = i'
then by subst h; simp only [add_apply, single_apply, erase_apply, dif_pos rfl, if_pos, zero_add]
else by simp only [add_apply, single_apply, erase_apply, dif_neg h, if_neg (ne.symm h), add_zero]
protected theorem induction {p : (Π₀ i, β i) → Prop} (f : Π₀ i, β i)
(h0 : p 0) (ha : ∀i b (f : Π₀ i, β i), f i = 0 → b ≠ 0 → p f → p (single i b + f)) :
p f :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on f (λ x, _),
cases x with f s H, revert f H,
apply multiset.induction_on s,
{ intros f H, convert h0, ext i, exact (H i).resolve_left id },
intros i s ih f H,
by_cases H1 : i ∈ s,
{ have H2 : ∀ j, j ∈ s ∨ f j = 0,
{ intro j, cases H j with H2 H2,
{ cases multiset.mem_cons.1 H2 with H3 H3,
{ left, rw H3, exact H1 },
{ left, exact H3 } },
right, exact H2 },
have H3 : (⟦{to_fun := f, pre_support := i ::ₘ s, zero := H}⟧ : Π₀ i, β i)
= ⟦{to_fun := f, pre_support := s, zero := H2}⟧,
{ exact quotient.sound (λ i, rfl) },
rw H3, apply ih },
have H2 : p (erase i ⟦{to_fun := f, pre_support := i ::ₘ s, zero := H}⟧),
{ dsimp only [erase, quotient.lift_on_mk],
have H2 : ∀ j, j ∈ s ∨ ite (j = i) 0 (f j) = 0,
{ intro j, cases H j with H2 H2,
{ cases multiset.mem_cons.1 H2 with H3 H3,
{ right, exact if_pos H3 },
{ left, exact H3 } },
right, split_ifs; [refl, exact H2] },
have H3 : (⟦{to_fun := λ (j : ι), ite (j = i) 0 (f j),
pre_support := i ::ₘ s, zero := _}⟧ : Π₀ i, β i)
= ⟦{to_fun := λ (j : ι), ite (j = i) 0 (f j), pre_support := s, zero := H2}⟧ :=
quotient.sound (λ i, rfl),
rw H3, apply ih },
have H3 : single i _ + _ = (⟦{to_fun := f, pre_support := i ::ₘ s, zero := H}⟧ : Π₀ i, β i) :=
single_add_erase,
rw ← H3,
change p (single i (f i) + _),
cases classical.em (f i = 0) with h h,
{ rw [h, single_zero, zero_add], exact H2 },
refine ha _ _ _ _ h H2,
rw erase_same
end
lemma induction₂ {p : (Π₀ i, β i) → Prop} (f : Π₀ i, β i)
(h0 : p 0) (ha : ∀i b (f : Π₀ i, β i), f i = 0 → b ≠ 0 → p f → p (f + single i b)) :
p f :=
dfinsupp.induction f h0 $ λ i b f h1 h2 h3,
have h4 : f + single i b = single i b + f,
{ ext j, by_cases H : i = j,
{ subst H, simp [h1] },
{ simp [H] } },
eq.rec_on h4 $ ha i b f h1 h2 h3
@[simp] lemma add_closure_Union_range_single :
add_submonoid.closure (⋃ i : ι, set.range (single i : β i → (Π₀ i, β i))) = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ λ x hx, (begin
apply dfinsupp.induction x,
exact add_submonoid.zero_mem _,
exact λ a b f ha hb hf, add_submonoid.add_mem _
(add_submonoid.subset_closure $ set.mem_Union.2 ⟨a, set.mem_range_self _⟩) hf
end)
/-- If two additive homomorphisms from `Π₀ i, β i` are equal on each `single a b`, then
they are equal. -/
lemma add_hom_ext {γ : Type w} [add_zero_class γ] ⦃f g : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ γ⦄
(H : ∀ (i : ι) (y : β i), f (single i y) = g (single i y)) :
f = g :=
begin
refine add_monoid_hom.eq_of_eq_on_mdense add_closure_Union_range_single (λ f hf, _),
simp only [set.mem_Union, set.mem_range] at hf,
rcases hf with ⟨x, y, rfl⟩,
apply H
end
/-- If two additive homomorphisms from `Π₀ i, β i` are equal on each `single a b`, then
they are equal.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext] lemma add_hom_ext' {γ : Type w} [add_zero_class γ] ⦃f g : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ γ⦄
(H : ∀ x, f.comp (single_add_hom β x) = g.comp (single_add_hom β x)) :
f = g :=
add_hom_ext $ λ x, add_monoid_hom.congr_fun (H x)
end add_monoid
@[simp] lemma mk_add [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] {s : finset ι} {x y : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i} :
mk s (x + y) = mk s x + mk s y :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [add_apply, mk_apply]; split_ifs; [refl, rw zero_add]
@[simp] lemma mk_zero [Π i, has_zero (β i)] {s : finset ι} :
mk s (0 : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1) = 0 :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [mk_apply]; split_ifs; refl
@[simp] lemma mk_neg [Π i, add_group (β i)] {s : finset ι} {x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1} :
mk s (-x) = -mk s x :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [neg_apply, mk_apply]; split_ifs; [refl, rw neg_zero]
@[simp] lemma mk_sub [Π i, add_group (β i)] {s : finset ι} {x y : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1} :
mk s (x - y) = mk s x - mk s y :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [sub_apply, mk_apply]; split_ifs; [refl, rw sub_zero]
/-- If `s` is a subset of `ι` then `mk_add_group_hom s` is the canonical additive
group homomorphism from $\prod_{i\in s}\beta_i$ to $\prod_{\mathtt{i : \iota}}\beta_i.$-/
def mk_add_group_hom [Π i, add_group (β i)] (s : finset ι) :
(Π (i : (s : set ι)), β ↑i) →+ (Π₀ (i : ι), β i) :=
{ to_fun := mk s,
map_zero' := mk_zero,
map_add' := λ _ _, mk_add }
section
variables (γ : Type w) [semiring γ] [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i, module γ (β i)]
include γ
@[simp] lemma mk_smul {s : finset ι} {c : γ} (x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1) :
mk s (c • x) = c • mk s x :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, mk_apply]; split_ifs; [refl, rw smul_zero]
@[simp] lemma single_smul {i : ι} {c : γ} {x : β i} :
single i (c • x) = c • single i x :=
ext $ λ i, by simp only [smul_apply, single_apply]; split_ifs; [cases h, rw smul_zero]; refl
end
section support_basic
variables [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
/-- Set `{i | f x ≠ 0}` as a `finset`. -/
def support (f : Π₀ i, β i) : finset ι :=
quotient.lift_on f (λ x, x.2.to_finset.filter $ λ i, x.1 i ≠ 0) $
begin
intros x y Hxy,
ext i, split,
{ intro H,
rcases finset.mem_filter.1 H with ⟨h1, h2⟩,
rw Hxy i at h2,
exact finset.mem_filter.2 ⟨multiset.mem_to_finset.2 $ (y.3 i).resolve_right h2, h2⟩ },
{ intro H,
rcases finset.mem_filter.1 H with ⟨h1, h2⟩,
rw ← Hxy i at h2,
exact finset.mem_filter.2 ⟨multiset.mem_to_finset.2 $ (x.3 i).resolve_right h2, h2⟩ },
end
@[simp] theorem support_mk_subset {s : finset ι} {x : Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1} :
(mk s x).support ⊆ s :=
λ i H, multiset.mem_to_finset.1 (finset.mem_filter.1 H).1
@[simp] theorem mem_support_to_fun (f : Π₀ i, β i) (i) : i ∈ f.support ↔ f i ≠ 0 :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on f (λ x, _),
dsimp only [support, quotient.lift_on_mk],
rw [finset.mem_filter, multiset.mem_to_finset],
exact and_iff_right_of_imp (x.3 i).resolve_right
end
theorem eq_mk_support (f : Π₀ i, β i) : f = mk f.support (λ i, f i) :=
begin
change f = mk f.support (λ i, f i.1),
ext i,
by_cases h : f i ≠ 0; [skip, rw [not_not] at h];
simp [h]
end
@[simp] lemma support_zero : (0 : Π₀ i, β i).support = ∅ := rfl
lemma mem_support_iff (f : Π₀ i, β i) : ∀i:ι, i ∈ f.support ↔ f i ≠ 0 :=
f.mem_support_to_fun
@[simp] lemma support_eq_empty {f : Π₀ i, β i} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
⟨λ H, ext $ by simpa [finset.ext_iff] using H, by simp {contextual:=tt}⟩
instance decidable_zero : decidable_pred (eq (0 : Π₀ i, β i)) :=
λ f, decidable_of_iff _ $ support_eq_empty.trans eq_comm
lemma support_subset_iff {s : set ι} {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ (∀i∉s, f i = 0) :=
by simp [set.subset_def];
exact forall_congr (assume i, not_imp_comm)
lemma support_single_ne_zero {i : ι} {b : β i} (hb : b ≠ 0) : (single i b).support = {i} :=
begin
ext j, by_cases h : i = j,
{ subst h, simp [hb] },
simp [ne.symm h, h]
end
lemma support_single_subset {i : ι} {b : β i} : (single i b).support ⊆ {i} :=
support_mk_subset
section map_range_and_zip_with
variables [Π i, has_zero (β₁ i)] [Π i, has_zero (β₂ i)]
lemma map_range_def [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {g : Π₀ i, β₁ i} :
map_range f hf g = mk g.support (λ i, f i.1 (g i.1)) :=
begin
ext i,
by_cases h : g i ≠ 0; simp at h; simp [h, hf]
end
@[simp] lemma map_range_single {f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {i : ι} {b : β₁ i} :
map_range f hf (single i b) = single i (f i b) :=
dfinsupp.ext $ λ i', by by_cases i = i'; [{subst i', simp}, simp [h, hf]]
variables [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [Π i (x : β₂ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
lemma support_map_range {f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {g : Π₀ i, β₁ i} :
(map_range f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
by simp [map_range_def]
lemma zip_with_def {ι : Type u} {β : ι → Type v} {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
[dec : decidable_eq ι] [Π (i : ι), has_zero (β i)] [Π (i : ι), has_zero (β₁ i)]
[Π (i : ι), has_zero (β₂ i)] [Π (i : ι) (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π (i : ι) (x : β₂ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0}
{g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i} {g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i} :
zip_with f hf g₁ g₂ = mk (g₁.support ∪ g₂.support) (λ i, f i.1 (g₁ i.1) (g₂ i.1)) :=
begin
ext i,
by_cases h1 : g₁ i ≠ 0; by_cases h2 : g₂ i ≠ 0;
simp only [not_not, ne.def] at h1 h2; simp [h1, h2, hf]
end
lemma support_zip_with {f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0}
{g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i} {g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i} :
(zip_with f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
by simp [zip_with_def]
end map_range_and_zip_with
lemma erase_def (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.erase i = mk (f.support.erase i) (λ j, f j.1) :=
by { ext j, by_cases h1 : j = i; by_cases h2 : f j ≠ 0; simp at h2; simp [h1, h2] }
@[simp] lemma support_erase (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
(f.erase i).support = f.support.erase i :=
by { ext j, by_cases h1 : j = i; by_cases h2 : f j ≠ 0; simp at h2; simp [h1, h2] }
section filter_and_subtype_domain
variables {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
lemma filter_def (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.filter p = mk (f.support.filter p) (λ i, f i.1) :=
by ext i; by_cases h1 : p i; by_cases h2 : f i ≠ 0;
simp at h2; simp [h1, h2]
@[simp] lemma support_filter (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
(f.filter p).support = f.support.filter p :=
by ext i; by_cases h : p i; simp [h]
lemma subtype_domain_def (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
f.subtype_domain p = mk (f.support.subtype p) (λ i, f i) :=
by ext i; by_cases h1 : p i; by_cases h2 : f i ≠ 0;
try {simp at h2}; dsimp; simp [h1, h2, ← subtype.val_eq_coe]
@[simp] lemma support_subtype_domain {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
(subtype_domain p f).support = f.support.subtype p :=
by ext i; by_cases h1 : p i; by_cases h2 : f i ≠ 0;
try {simp at h2}; dsimp; simp [h1, h2]
end filter_and_subtype_domain
end support_basic
lemma support_add [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β i} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zip_with
@[simp] lemma support_neg [Π i, add_group (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{f : Π₀ i, β i} :
support (-f) = support f :=
by ext i; simp
lemma support_smul {γ : Type w} [semiring γ] [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i, module γ (β i)]
[Π ( i : ι) (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
(b : γ) (v : Π₀ i, β i) : (b • v).support ⊆ v.support :=
support_map_range
instance [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i, decidable_eq (β i)] : decidable_eq (Π₀ i, β i) :=
assume f g, decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ (∀i∈f.support, f i = g i))
⟨assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ext $ assume i,
if h : i ∈ f.support then h₂ i h else
have hf : f i = 0, by rwa [f.mem_support_iff, not_not] at h,
have hg : g i = 0, by rwa [h₁, g.mem_support_iff, not_not] at h,
by rw [hf, hg],
by intro h; subst h; simp⟩
section prod_and_sum
variables {γ : Type w}
-- [to_additive sum] for dfinsupp.prod doesn't work, the equation lemmas are not generated
/-- `sum f g` is the sum of `g i (f i)` over the support of `f`. -/
def sum [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → γ) : γ :=
∑ i in f.support, g i (f i)
/-- `prod f g` is the product of `g i (f i)` over the support of `f`. -/
@[to_additive]
def prod [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → γ) : γ :=
∏ i in f.support, g i (f i)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_range_index {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
[Π i, has_zero (β₁ i)] [Π i, has_zero (β₂ i)]
[Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [Π i (x : β₂ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
{f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i} {hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0} {g : Π₀ i, β₁ i} {h : Π i, β₂ i → γ}
(h0 : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) :
(map_range f hf g).prod h = g.prod (λi b, h i (f i b)) :=
begin
rw [map_range_def],
refine (finset.prod_subset support_mk_subset _).trans _,
{ intros i h1 h2,
dsimp, simp [h1] at h2, dsimp at h2,
simp [h1, h2, h0] },
{ refine finset.prod_congr rfl _,
intros i h1,
simp [h1] }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_zero_index [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] {h : Π i, β i → γ} : (0 : Π₀ i, β i).prod h = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_single_index [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
{i : ι} {b : β i} {h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_zero : h i 0 = 1) :
(single i b).prod h = h i b :=
begin
by_cases h : b ≠ 0,
{ simp [dfinsupp.prod, support_single_ne_zero h] },
{ rw [not_not] at h, simp [h, prod_zero_index, h_zero], refl }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_neg_index [Π i, add_group (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
{g : Π₀ i, β i} {h : Π i, β i → γ} (h0 : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) :
(-g).prod h = g.prod (λi b, h i (- b)) :=
prod_map_range_index h0
omit dec
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_comm {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {β₁ : ι₁ → Type*} {β₂ : ι₂ → Type*}
[decidable_eq ι₁] [decidable_eq ι₂] [Π i, has_zero (β₁ i)] [Π i, has_zero (β₂ i)]
[Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [Π i (x : β₂ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] [comm_monoid γ]
(f₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (f₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i) (h : Π i, β₁ i → Π i, β₂ i → γ) :
f₁.prod (λ i₁ x₁, f₂.prod $ λ i₂ x₂, h i₁ x₁ i₂ x₂) =
f₂.prod (λ i₂ x₂, f₁.prod $ λ i₁ x₁, h i₁ x₁ i₂ x₂) := finset.prod_comm
@[simp] lemma sum_apply {ι₁ : Type u₁} [decidable_eq ι₁] {β₁ : ι₁ → Type v₁}
[Π i₁, has_zero (β₁ i₁)] [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)]
{f : Π₀ i₁, β₁ i₁} {g : Π i₁, β₁ i₁ → Π₀ i, β i} {i₂ : ι} :
(f.sum g) i₂ = f.sum (λi₁ b, g i₁ b i₂) :=
(eval_add_monoid_hom i₂ : (Π₀ i, β i) →+ β i₂).map_sum _ f.support
include dec
lemma support_sum {ι₁ : Type u₁} [decidable_eq ι₁] {β₁ : ι₁ → Type v₁}
[Π i₁, has_zero (β₁ i₁)] [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
{f : Π₀ i₁, β₁ i₁} {g : Π i₁, β₁ i₁ → Π₀ i, β i} :
(f.sum g).support ⊆ f.support.bUnion (λi, (g i (f i)).support) :=
have ∀i₁ : ι, f.sum (λ (i : ι₁) (b : β₁ i), (g i b) i₁) ≠ 0 →
(∃ (i : ι₁), f i ≠ 0 ∧ ¬ (g i (f i)) i₁ = 0),
from assume i₁ h,
let ⟨i, hi, ne⟩ := finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero h in
⟨i, (f.mem_support_iff i).mp hi, ne⟩,
by simpa [finset.subset_iff, mem_support_iff, finset.mem_bUnion, sum_apply] using this
@[simp, to_additive] lemma prod_one [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
f.prod (λi b, (1 : γ)) = 1 :=
finset.prod_const_one
@[simp, to_additive] lemma prod_mul [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] {f : Π₀ i, β i} {h₁ h₂ : Π i, β i → γ} :
f.prod (λi b, h₁ i b * h₂ i b) = f.prod h₁ * f.prod h₂ :=
finset.prod_mul_distrib
@[simp, to_additive] lemma prod_inv [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_group γ] {f : Π₀ i, β i} {h : Π i, β i → γ} :
f.prod (λi b, (h i b)⁻¹) = (f.prod h)⁻¹ :=
((comm_group.inv_monoid_hom : γ →* γ).map_prod _ f.support).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_add_index [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] {f g : Π₀ i, β i}
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_zero : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ + b₂) = h i b₁ * h i b₂) :
(f + g).prod h = f.prod h * g.prod h :=
have f_eq : ∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i (f i) = f.prod h,
from (finset.prod_subset (finset.subset_union_left _ _) $
by simp [mem_support_iff, h_zero] {contextual := tt}).symm,
have g_eq : ∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i (g i) = g.prod h,
from (finset.prod_subset (finset.subset_union_right _ _) $
by simp [mem_support_iff, h_zero] {contextual := tt}).symm,
calc ∏ i in (f + g).support, h i ((f + g) i) =
∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i ((f + g) i) :
finset.prod_subset support_add $
by simp [mem_support_iff, h_zero] {contextual := tt}
... = (∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i (f i)) *
(∏ i in f.support ∪ g.support, h i (g i)) :
by simp [h_add, finset.prod_mul_distrib]
... = _ : by rw [f_eq, g_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.submonoid.dfinsupp_prod_mem [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] (S : submonoid γ)
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → γ) (h : ∀ c, f c ≠ 0 → g c (f c) ∈ S) : f.prod g ∈ S :=
S.prod_mem $ λ i hi, h _ $ (f.mem_support_iff _).mp hi
/--
When summing over an `add_monoid_hom`, the decidability assumption is not needed, and the result is
also an `add_monoid_hom`.
-/
def sum_add_hom [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ] (φ : Π i, β i →+ γ) :
(Π₀ i, β i) →+ γ :=
{ to_fun := (λ f,
quotient.lift_on f (λ x, ∑ i in x.2.to_finset, φ i (x.1 i)) $ λ x y H,
begin
have H1 : x.2.to_finset ∩ y.2.to_finset ⊆ x.2.to_finset, from finset.inter_subset_left _ _,
have H2 : x.2.to_finset ∩ y.2.to_finset ⊆ y.2.to_finset, from finset.inter_subset_right _ _,
refine (finset.sum_subset H1 _).symm.trans
((finset.sum_congr rfl _).trans (finset.sum_subset H2 _)),
{ intros i H1 H2, rw finset.mem_inter at H2, rw H i,
simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset] at H1 H2,
rw [(y.3 i).resolve_left (mt (and.intro H1) H2), add_monoid_hom.map_zero] },
{ intros i H1, rw H i },
{ intros i H1 H2, rw finset.mem_inter at H2, rw ← H i,
simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset] at H1 H2,
rw [(x.3 i).resolve_left (mt (λ H3, and.intro H3 H1) H2), add_monoid_hom.map_zero] }
end),
map_add' := assume f g,
begin
refine quotient.induction_on f (λ x, _),
refine quotient.induction_on g (λ y, _),
change ∑ i in _, _ = (∑ i in _, _) + (∑ i in _, _),
simp only, conv { to_lhs, congr, skip, funext, rw add_monoid_hom.map_add },
simp only [finset.sum_add_distrib],
congr' 1,
{ refine (finset.sum_subset _ _).symm,
{ intro i, simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.mem_add], exact or.inl },
{ intros i H1 H2, simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.mem_add] at H2,
rw [(x.3 i).resolve_left H2, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] } },
{ refine (finset.sum_subset _ _).symm,
{ intro i, simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.mem_add], exact or.inr },
{ intros i H1 H2, simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.mem_add] at H2,
rw [(y.3 i).resolve_left H2, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] } }
end,
map_zero' := rfl }
@[simp] lemma sum_add_hom_single [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
(φ : Π i, β i →+ γ) (i) (x : β i) : sum_add_hom φ (single i x) = φ i x :=
(add_zero _).trans $ congr_arg (φ i) $ show (if H : i ∈ ({i} : finset _) then x else 0) = x,
from dif_pos $ finset.mem_singleton_self i
@[simp] lemma sum_add_hom_comp_single [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
(f : Π i, β i →+ γ) (i : ι) :
(sum_add_hom f).comp (single_add_hom β i) = f i :=
add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ x, sum_add_hom_single f i x
/-- While we didn't need decidable instances to define it, we do to reduce it to a sum -/
lemma sum_add_hom_apply [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[add_comm_monoid γ] (φ : Π i, β i →+ γ) (f : Π₀ i, β i) :
sum_add_hom φ f = f.sum (λ x, φ x) :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on f (λ x, _),
change ∑ i in _, _ = (∑ i in finset.filter _ _, _),
rw [finset.sum_filter, finset.sum_congr rfl],
intros i _,
dsimp only,
split_ifs,
refl,
rw [(not_not.mp h), add_monoid_hom.map_zero],
end
lemma _root_.add_submonoid.dfinsupp_sum_add_hom_mem [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
(S : add_submonoid γ) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i →+ γ) (h : ∀ c, f c ≠ 0 → g c (f c) ∈ S) :
dfinsupp.sum_add_hom g f ∈ S :=
begin
classical,
rw dfinsupp.sum_add_hom_apply,
convert S.dfinsupp_sum_mem _ _ _,
exact h
end
/-- The supremum of a family of commutative additive submonoids is equal to the range of
`finsupp.sum_add_hom`; that is, every element in the `supr` can be produced from taking a finite
number of non-zero elements of `p i`, coercing them to `γ`, and summing them. -/
lemma _root_.add_submonoid.supr_eq_mrange_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom [add_comm_monoid γ]
(p : ι → add_submonoid γ) : supr p = (dfinsupp.sum_add_hom (λ i, (p i).subtype)).mrange :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply supr_le _,
intros i y hy,
exact ⟨dfinsupp.single i ⟨y, hy⟩, dfinsupp.sum_add_hom_single _ _ _⟩, },
{ rintros x ⟨v, rfl⟩,
exact add_submonoid.dfinsupp_sum_add_hom_mem _ v _ (λ i _, (le_supr p i : p i ≤ _) (v i).prop) }
end
lemma _root_.add_submonoid.mem_supr_iff_exists_dfinsupp [add_comm_monoid γ]
(p : ι → add_submonoid γ) (x : γ) :
x ∈ supr p ↔ ∃ f : Π₀ i, p i, dfinsupp.sum_add_hom (λ i, (p i).subtype) f = x :=
set_like.ext_iff.mp (add_submonoid.supr_eq_mrange_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom p) x
/-- A variant of `add_submonoid.mem_supr_iff_exists_dfinsupp` with the RHS fully unfolded. -/
lemma _root_.add_submonoid.mem_supr_iff_exists_dfinsupp' [add_comm_monoid γ]
(p : ι → add_submonoid γ) [Π i (x : p i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] (x : γ) :
x ∈ supr p ↔ ∃ f : Π₀ i, p i, f.sum (λ i xi, ↑xi) = x :=
begin
rw add_submonoid.mem_supr_iff_exists_dfinsupp,
simp_rw sum_add_hom_apply,
congr',
end
omit dec
lemma sum_add_hom_comm {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {β₁ : ι₁ → Type*} {β₂ : ι₂ → Type*} {γ : Type*}
[decidable_eq ι₁] [decidable_eq ι₂] [Π i, add_zero_class (β₁ i)] [Π i, add_zero_class (β₂ i)]
[add_comm_monoid γ]
(f₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (f₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i) (h : Π i j, β₁ i →+ β₂ j →+ γ) :
sum_add_hom (λ i₂, sum_add_hom (λ i₁, h i₁ i₂) f₁) f₂ =
sum_add_hom (λ i₁, sum_add_hom (λ i₂, (h i₁ i₂).flip) f₂) f₁ :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on₂ f₁ f₂ (λ x₁ x₂, _),
simp only [sum_add_hom, add_monoid_hom.finset_sum_apply, quotient.lift_on_mk,
add_monoid_hom.coe_mk, add_monoid_hom.flip_apply],
exact finset.sum_comm,
end
include dec
/-- The `dfinsupp` version of `finsupp.lift_add_hom`,-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def lift_add_hom [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ] :
(Π i, β i →+ γ) ≃+ ((Π₀ i, β i) →+ γ) :=
{ to_fun := sum_add_hom,
inv_fun := λ F i, F.comp (single_add_hom β i),
left_inv := λ x, by { ext, simp },
right_inv := λ ψ, by { ext, simp },
map_add' := λ F G, by { ext, simp } }
/-- The `dfinsupp` version of `finsupp.lift_add_hom_single_add_hom`,-/
@[simp] lemma lift_add_hom_single_add_hom [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] :
lift_add_hom (single_add_hom β) = add_monoid_hom.id (Π₀ i, β i) :=
lift_add_hom.to_equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.2 rfl
/-- The `dfinsupp` version of `finsupp.lift_add_hom_apply_single`,-/
lemma lift_add_hom_apply_single [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
(f : Π i, β i →+ γ) (i : ι) (x : β i) :
lift_add_hom f (single i x) = f i x :=
by simp
/-- The `dfinsupp` version of `finsupp.lift_add_hom_comp_single`,-/
lemma lift_add_hom_comp_single [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
(f : Π i, β i →+ γ) (i : ι) :
(lift_add_hom f).comp (single_add_hom β i) = f i :=
by simp
/-- The `dfinsupp` version of `finsupp.comp_lift_add_hom`,-/
lemma comp_lift_add_hom {δ : Type*} [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
[add_comm_monoid δ] (g : γ →+ δ) (f : Π i, β i →+ γ) :
g.comp (lift_add_hom f) = lift_add_hom (λ a, g.comp (f a)) :=
lift_add_hom.symm_apply_eq.1 $ funext $ λ a,
by rw [lift_add_hom_symm_apply, add_monoid_hom.comp_assoc, lift_add_hom_comp_single]
@[simp]
lemma sum_add_hom_zero [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ] :
sum_add_hom (λ i, (0 : β i →+ γ)) = 0 :=
(lift_add_hom : (Π i, β i →+ γ) ≃+ _).map_zero
@[simp]
lemma sum_add_hom_add [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
(g : Π i, β i →+ γ) (h : Π i, β i →+ γ) :
sum_add_hom (λ i, g i + h i) = sum_add_hom g + sum_add_hom h :=
lift_add_hom.map_add _ _
@[simp]
lemma sum_add_hom_single_add_hom [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] :
sum_add_hom (single_add_hom β) = add_monoid_hom.id _ :=
lift_add_hom_single_add_hom
lemma comp_sum_add_hom {δ : Type*} [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [add_comm_monoid γ]
[add_comm_monoid δ] (g : γ →+ δ) (f : Π i, β i →+ γ) :
g.comp (sum_add_hom f) = sum_add_hom (λ a, g.comp (f a)) :=
comp_lift_add_hom _ _
lemma sum_sub_index [Π i, add_group (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[add_comm_group γ] {f g : Π₀ i, β i}
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_sub : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ - b₂) = h i b₁ - h i b₂) :
(f - g).sum h = f.sum h - g.sum h :=
begin
have := (lift_add_hom (λ a, add_monoid_hom.of_map_sub (h a) (h_sub a))).map_sub f g,
rw [lift_add_hom_apply, sum_add_hom_apply, sum_add_hom_apply, sum_add_hom_apply] at this,
exact this,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_finset_sum_index {γ : Type w} {α : Type x}
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ]
{s : finset α} {g : α → Π₀ i, β i}
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_zero : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ + b₂) = h i b₁ * h i b₂) :
∏ i in s, (g i).prod h = (∑ i in s, g i).prod h :=
begin
classical,
exact finset.induction_on s
(by simp [prod_zero_index])
(by simp [prod_add_index, h_zero, h_add] {contextual := tt})
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sum_index {ι₁ : Type u₁} [decidable_eq ι₁] {β₁ : ι₁ → Type v₁}
[Π i₁, has_zero (β₁ i₁)] [Π i (x : β₁ i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ]
{f : Π₀ i₁, β₁ i₁} {g : Π i₁, β₁ i₁ → Π₀ i, β i}
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (h_zero : ∀i, h i 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀i b₁ b₂, h i (b₁ + b₂) = h i b₁ * h i b₂) :
(f.sum g).prod h = f.prod (λi b, (g i b).prod h) :=
(prod_finset_sum_index h_zero h_add).symm
@[simp] lemma sum_single [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)]
[Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)] {f : Π₀ i, β i} :
f.sum single = f :=
begin
have := add_monoid_hom.congr_fun lift_add_hom_single_add_hom f,
rw [lift_add_hom_apply, sum_add_hom_apply] at this,
exact this,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_subtype_domain_index [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[comm_monoid γ] {v : Π₀ i, β i} {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{h : Π i, β i → γ} (hp : ∀ x ∈ v.support, p x) :
(v.subtype_domain p).prod (λi b, h i b) = v.prod h :=
finset.prod_bij (λp _, p)
(by simp) (by simp)
(assume ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩ ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩, by simp)
(λ i hi, ⟨⟨i, hp i hi⟩, by simpa using hi, rfl⟩)
omit dec
lemma subtype_domain_sum [Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)]
{s : finset γ} {h : γ → Π₀ i, β i} {p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
(∑ c in s, h c).subtype_domain p = ∑ c in s, (h c).subtype_domain p :=
(subtype_domain_add_monoid_hom : (Π₀ (i : ι), β i) →+ Π₀ (i : subtype p), β i).map_sum _ s
lemma subtype_domain_finsupp_sum {δ : γ → Type x} [decidable_eq γ]
[Π c, has_zero (δ c)] [Π c (x : δ c), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
[Π i, add_comm_monoid (β i)]
{p : ι → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{s : Π₀ c, δ c} {h : Π c, δ c → Π₀ i, β i} :
(s.sum h).subtype_domain p = s.sum (λc d, (h c d).subtype_domain p) :=
subtype_domain_sum
end prod_and_sum
/-! ### Bundled versions of `dfinsupp.map_range`
The names should match the equivalent bundled `finsupp.map_range` definitions.
-/
section map_range
omit dec
variables [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] [Π i, add_zero_class (β₁ i)] [Π i, add_zero_class (β₂ i)]
lemma map_range_add (f : Π i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0)
(hf' : ∀ i x y, f i (x + y) = f i x + f i y) (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ i, β₁ i):
map_range f hf (g₁ + g₂) = map_range f hf g₁ + map_range f hf g₂ :=
begin
ext,
simp only [map_range_apply f, coe_add, pi.add_apply, hf']
end
/-- `dfinsupp.map_range` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps apply]
def map_range.add_monoid_hom (f : Π i, β₁ i →+ β₂ i) : (Π₀ i, β₁ i) →+ (Π₀ i, β₂ i) :=
{ to_fun := map_range (λ i x, f i x) (λ i, (f i).map_zero),
map_zero' := map_range_zero _ _,
map_add' := map_range_add _ _ (λ i, (f i).map_add) }
@[simp]
lemma map_range.add_monoid_hom_id :
map_range.add_monoid_hom (λ i, add_monoid_hom.id (β₂ i)) = add_monoid_hom.id _ :=
add_monoid_hom.ext map_range_id
lemma map_range.add_monoid_hom_comp (f : Π i, β₁ i →+ β₂ i) (f₂ : Π i, β i →+ β₁ i):
map_range.add_monoid_hom (λ i, (f i).comp (f₂ i)) =
(map_range.add_monoid_hom f).comp (map_range.add_monoid_hom f₂) :=
add_monoid_hom.ext $ map_range_comp (λ i x, f i x) (λ i x, f₂ i x) _ _ _
/-- `dfinsupp.map_range.add_monoid_hom` as an `add_equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def map_range.add_equiv (e : Π i, β₁ i ≃+ β₂ i) : (Π₀ i, β₁ i) ≃+ (Π₀ i, β₂ i) :=
{ to_fun := map_range (λ i x, e i x) (λ i, (e i).map_zero),
inv_fun := map_range (λ i x, (e i).symm x) (λ i, (e i).symm.map_zero),
left_inv := λ x, by rw ←map_range_comp; { simp_rw add_equiv.symm_comp_self, simp },
right_inv := λ x, by rw ←map_range_comp; { simp_rw add_equiv.self_comp_symm, simp },
.. map_range.add_monoid_hom (λ i, (e i).to_add_monoid_hom) }
@[simp]
lemma map_range.add_equiv_refl :
(map_range.add_equiv $ λ i, add_equiv.refl (β₁ i)) = add_equiv.refl _ :=
add_equiv.ext map_range_id
lemma map_range.add_equiv_trans (f : Π i, β i ≃+ β₁ i) (f₂ : Π i, β₁ i ≃+ β₂ i):
map_range.add_equiv (λ i, (f i).trans (f₂ i)) =
(map_range.add_equiv f).trans (map_range.add_equiv f₂) :=
add_equiv.ext $ map_range_comp (λ i x, f₂ i x) (λ i x, f i x) _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma map_range.add_equiv_symm (e : Π i, β₁ i ≃+ β₂ i) :
(map_range.add_equiv e).symm = map_range.add_equiv (λ i, (e i).symm) := rfl
end map_range
end dfinsupp
/-! ### Product and sum lemmas for bundled morphisms.
In this section, we provide analogues of `add_monoid_hom.map_sum`, `add_monoid_hom.coe_sum`, and
`add_monoid_hom.sum_apply` for `dfinsupp.sum` and `dfinsupp.sum_add_hom` instead of `finset.sum`.
We provide these for `add_monoid_hom`, `monoid_hom`, `ring_hom`, `add_equiv`, and `mul_equiv`.
Lemmas for `linear_map` and `linear_equiv` are in another file.
-/
section
variables [decidable_eq ι]
namespace monoid_hom
variables {R S : Type*}
variables [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_dfinsupp_prod [comm_monoid R] [comm_monoid S]
(h : R →* S) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → R) :
h (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ a b, h (g a b)) := h.map_prod _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_dfinsupp_prod [monoid R] [comm_monoid S]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → R →* S) :
⇑(f.prod g) = f.prod (λ a b, (g a b)) := coe_prod _ _
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma dfinsupp_prod_apply [monoid R] [comm_monoid S]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → R →* S) (r : R) :
(f.prod g) r = f.prod (λ a b, (g a b) r) := finset_prod_apply _ _ _
end monoid_hom
namespace ring_hom
variables {R S : Type*}
variables [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
@[simp]
lemma map_dfinsupp_prod [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
(h : R →+* S) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → R) :
h (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ a b, h (g a b)) := h.map_prod _ _
@[simp]
lemma map_dfinsupp_sum [non_assoc_semiring R] [non_assoc_semiring S]
(h : R →+* S) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → R) :
h (f.sum g) = f.sum (λ a b, h (g a b)) := h.map_sum _ _
end ring_hom
namespace mul_equiv
variables {R S : Type*}
variables [Π i, has_zero (β i)] [Π i (x : β i), decidable (x ≠ 0)]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_dfinsupp_prod [comm_monoid R] [comm_monoid S]
(h : R ≃* S) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i → R) :
h (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ a b, h (g a b)) := h.map_prod _ _
end mul_equiv
/-! The above lemmas, repeated for `dfinsupp.sum_add_hom`. -/
namespace add_monoid_hom
variables {R S : Type*}
open dfinsupp
@[simp]
lemma map_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom [add_comm_monoid R] [add_comm_monoid S] [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)]
(h : R →+ S) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i →+ R) :
h (sum_add_hom g f) = sum_add_hom (λ i, h.comp (g i)) f :=
congr_fun (comp_lift_add_hom h g) f
@[simp]
lemma dfinsupp_sum_add_hom_apply [add_zero_class R] [add_comm_monoid S] [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i →+ R →+ S) (r : R) :
(sum_add_hom g f) r = sum_add_hom (λ i, (eval r).comp (g i)) f :=
map_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom (eval r) f g
lemma coe_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom [add_zero_class R] [add_comm_monoid S] [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)]
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i →+ R →+ S) :
⇑(sum_add_hom g f) = sum_add_hom (λ i, (coe_fn R S).comp (g i)) f :=
map_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom (coe_fn R S) f g
end add_monoid_hom
namespace ring_hom
variables {R S : Type*}
open dfinsupp
@[simp]
lemma map_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom [non_assoc_semiring R] [non_assoc_semiring S]
[Π i, add_zero_class (β i)] (h : R →+* S) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i →+ R) :
h (sum_add_hom g f) = sum_add_hom (λ i, h.to_add_monoid_hom.comp (g i)) f :=
add_monoid_hom.congr_fun (comp_lift_add_hom h.to_add_monoid_hom g) f
end ring_hom
namespace add_equiv
variables {R S : Type*}
open dfinsupp
@[simp]
lemma map_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom [add_comm_monoid R] [add_comm_monoid S] [Π i, add_zero_class (β i)]
(h : R ≃+ S) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : Π i, β i →+ R) :
h (sum_add_hom g f) = sum_add_hom (λ i, h.to_add_monoid_hom.comp (g i)) f :=
add_monoid_hom.congr_fun (comp_lift_add_hom h.to_add_monoid_hom g) f
end add_equiv
end
|
0229896724cb28129406e484c7db9132cbeb0f9b | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/633.lean | 0b357195ddd073d5bd15a844a7dc9370c7da1a40 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,410 | lean | abbrev semantics (α:Type) := StateM (List Nat) α
inductive expression : Nat → Type
| const : (n : Nat) → expression n
def uext {w:Nat} (x: expression w) (o:Nat) : expression w := expression.const _
def eval {n : Nat} (v:expression n) : semantics (expression n) := pure (expression.const _)
def set_overflow {w : Nat} (e : expression w) : semantics Unit := pure ()
structure instruction :=
(mnemonic:String)
(patterns:List Nat)
def definst (mnem:String) (body: expression 8 -> semantics Unit) : instruction :=
{ mnemonic := mnem
, patterns := ((body (expression.const _)).run []).snd.reverse
}
def mul : instruction := Id.run <| do -- this is a "pure" do block (as in it is the Id monad)
definst "mul" $ fun (src : expression 8) =>
let action : semantics Unit := do -- this is not "pure" do block
let tmp <- eval $ uext src 16
set_overflow $ tmp
action
def mul' : instruction := Id.run <| do -- this is a "pure" do block (as in it is the Id monad)
definst "mul" $ fun (src : expression 8) =>
let rec action : semantics Unit := do -- this is not "pure" do block
let tmp <- eval $ uext src 16
set_overflow $ tmp
action
def mul'' : instruction := Id.run <| do -- this is a "pure" do block (as in it is the Id monad)
definst "mul" $ fun (src : expression 8) =>
let action : semantics (expression 8) :=
return (<- eval $ uext src 16)
pure ()
|
5724fb0c8be86c0342a19a7a2dfb5c98cce75174 | e38e95b38a38a99ecfa1255822e78e4b26f65bb0 | /src/certigrad/reparam.lean | bb4b4d69b41931a864d264535a274bb48fd9b8fb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ColaDrill/certigrad | fefb1be3670adccd3bed2f3faf57507f156fd501 | fe288251f623ac7152e5ce555f1cd9d3a20203c2 | refs/heads/master | 1,593,297,324,250 | 1,499,903,753,000 | 1,499,903,753,000 | 97,075,797 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,499,916,210,000 | 1,499,916,210,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,176 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Daniel Selsam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Daniel Selsam
Certified graph transformation that "reparameterizes" a specific occurrence of a stochastic choice.
-/
import .util .tensor .tfacts .compute_grad .graph .tactics .ops .predicates .lemmas .env
namespace certigrad
open list
section algebra
open T
lemma mvn_iso_transform {shape : S} (μ σ x : T shape) (H_σ : σ > 0) :
mvn_iso_pdf μ σ x = (prod σ⁻¹) * mvn_iso_pdf 0 1 ((x - μ) / σ) :=
calc mvn_iso_pdf μ σ x
= prod ((sqrt ((2 * pi shape) * square σ))⁻¹ * exp ((- 2⁻¹) * (square $ (x - μ) / σ))) : rfl
... = prod ((sqrt (2 * pi shape) * σ)⁻¹ * exp ((- 2⁻¹) * (square $ (x - μ) / σ))) : by rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_square]
... = prod (((sqrt (2 * pi shape))⁻¹ * σ⁻¹) * exp ((- 2⁻¹) * (square $ (x - μ) / σ))) : by rw [T.mul_inv_pos (sqrt_pos two_pi_pos) H_σ]
... = (prod σ⁻¹) * prod ((sqrt (2 * pi shape))⁻¹ * exp ((- 2⁻¹) * (square $ (x - μ) / σ))) : by simp [prod_mul]
... = (prod σ⁻¹) * prod ((sqrt ((2 * pi shape) * square 1))⁻¹ * exp ((- 2⁻¹) * (square ((((x - μ) / σ) - 0) / 1)))) : by simp [T.div_one, square]
... = (prod σ⁻¹) * mvn_iso_pdf 0 1 ((x - μ) / σ) : rfl
end algebra
open sprog
lemma mvn_reparam_same {shape oshape : S} {μ σ : T shape} (f : dvec T [shape] → T oshape) : σ > 0 →
E (prim (rand.op.mvn_iso shape) ⟦μ, σ⟧) f
=
E (bind (prim (rand.op.mvn_iso_std shape) ⟦⟧) (λ (x : dvec T [shape]), ret ⟦(x^.head * σ) + μ⟧)) f :=
assume (H_σ_pos : σ > 0),
begin
simp only [E.E_bind, E.E_ret],
dunfold E rand.op.mvn_iso rand.op.pdf T.dintegral dvec.head rand.pdf.mvn_iso rand.pdf.mvn_iso_std,
simp only [λ x, mvn_iso_transform μ σ x H_σ_pos],
assert H : ∀ (x : T shape), ((σ * x + μ + -μ) / σ) = x,
{ intro x, simp only [add_assoc, add_neg_self, add_zero], rw mul_comm, rw -T.mul_div_mul_alt, rw T.div_self H_σ_pos, rw mul_one},
definev g : T shape → T oshape := λ (x : T shape), T.mvn_iso_pdf 0 1 ((x - μ) / σ) ⬝ f ⟦x⟧,
assert H_rhs : ∀ (x : T shape), T.mvn_iso_pdf 0 1 x ⬝ f ⟦x * σ + μ⟧ = g (σ * x + μ),
{ intro x, dsimp, rw H, simp },
rw funext H_rhs,
rw T.integral_scale_shift_var g,
dsimp,
simp [T.smul_group]
end
def reparameterize_pre (eshape : S) : list node → env → Prop
| [] inputs := true
| (⟨⟨ref, shape⟩, [⟨μ, .(shape)⟩, ⟨σ, .(shape)⟩], operator.rand (rand.op.mvn_iso .(shape))⟩::nodes) inputs :=
eshape = shape ∧ σ ≠ μ ∧ 0 < env.get (σ, shape) inputs
| (⟨ref, parents, operator.det op⟩::nodes) inputs := reparameterize_pre nodes (env.insert ref (op^.f (env.get_ks parents inputs)) inputs)
| (⟨ref, parents, operator.rand op⟩::nodes) inputs := ∀ x, reparameterize_pre nodes (env.insert ref x inputs)
def reparameterize (fname : ID) : list node → list node
| [] := []
| (⟨⟨ident, shape⟩, [⟨μ, .(shape)⟩, ⟨σ, .(shape)⟩], operator.rand (rand.op.mvn_iso .(shape))⟩::nodes) :=
(⟨(fname, shape), [], operator.rand (rand.op.mvn_iso_std shape)⟩
::⟨(ident, shape), [(fname, shape), (σ, shape), (μ, shape)], operator.det (ops.mul_add shape)⟩
::nodes)
| (n::nodes) := n :: reparameterize nodes
theorem reparameterize_correct (costs : list ID) :
∀ (nodes : list node) (inputs : env) (fref : reference),
reparameterize_pre fref.2 nodes inputs →
uniq_ids nodes inputs →
all_parents_in_env inputs nodes →
(¬ env.has_key fref inputs) → fref ∉ map node.ref nodes →
(fref.1 ∉ costs) →
E (graph.to_dist (λ env₀, ⟦sum_costs env₀ costs⟧) inputs (reparameterize fref.1 nodes)) dvec.head
=
E (graph.to_dist (λ env₀, ⟦sum_costs env₀ costs⟧) inputs nodes) dvec.head
| [] _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ := rfl
| (⟨⟨ident, shape⟩, [⟨μ, .(shape)⟩, ⟨σ, .(shape)⟩], operator.rand (rand.op.mvn_iso .(shape))⟩::nodes) inputs fref H_pre H_uids H_ps_in_env H_fresh₁ H_fresh₂ H_not_cost :=
begin
dunfold reparameterize,
assertv H_eshape : fref.2 = shape := H_pre^.left,
assert H_fref : fref = (fref.1, shape),
{ clear reparameterize_correct, cases fref with fref₁ fref₂, dsimp at H_eshape, rw H_eshape },
assertv H_σ_μ : σ ≠ μ := H_pre^.right^.left,
dunfold graph.to_dist operator.to_dist,
dsimp,
simp [E.E_bind],
erw (mvn_reparam_same _ H_pre^.right^.right),
simp [E.E_bind, E.E_ret],
dunfold dvec.head,
dsimp,
apply congr_arg, apply funext, intro x,
assertv H_μ_in : env.has_key (μ, shape) inputs := H_ps_in_env^.left (μ, shape) (mem_cons_self _ _),
assertv H_σ_in : env.has_key (σ, shape) inputs := H_ps_in_env^.left (σ, shape) (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_cons_self _ _)),
assertv H_ident_nin : ¬ env.has_key (ident, shape) inputs := H_uids^.left,
assertv H_μ_neq_ident : (μ, shape) ≠ (ident, shape) := env_in_nin_ne H_μ_in H_ident_nin,
assertv H_σ_neq_ident : (σ, shape) ≠ (ident, shape) := env_in_nin_ne H_σ_in H_ident_nin,
assertv H_μ_neq_fref : (μ, shape) ≠ (fref.1, shape) := eq.rec_on H_fref (env_in_nin_ne H_μ_in H_fresh₁),
assertv H_σ_neq_fref : (σ, shape) ≠ (fref.1, shape) := eq.rec_on H_fref (env_in_nin_ne H_σ_in H_fresh₁),
assertv H_ident_neq_fref : (ident, shape) ≠ (fref.1, shape) := eq.rec_on H_fref (mem_not_mem_neq mem_of_cons_same H_fresh₂),
dunfold env.get_ks,
tactic.dget_dinsert,
rw (env.insert_insert_flip _ _ _ H_ident_neq_fref),
dsimp,
definev fval : T shape := dvec.head x,
definev fval_inputs : env := env.insert (ident, shape)
(det.op.f (ops.mul_add shape)
⟦dvec.head x, (env.get (σ, shape) inputs : T shape), (env.get (μ, shape) inputs : T shape)⟧)
inputs,
assertv H_ps_in_env_next : all_parents_in_env fval_inputs nodes := H_ps_in_env^. right _,
assertv H_fresh₁_next : ¬ env.has_key (fref.1, shape) fval_inputs :=
eq.rec_on H_fref (env_not_has_key_insert (eq.rec_on (eq.symm H_fref) $ ne.symm H_ident_neq_fref) H_fresh₁),
assertv H_fresh₂_next : (fref.1, shape) ∉ map node.ref nodes := eq.rec_on H_fref (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂),
erw (@to_dist_congr_insert costs nodes fval_inputs (fref.1, shape) fval H_ps_in_env_next H_fresh₁_next H_fresh₂_next H_not_cost),
dsimp,
dunfold det.op.f,
rw [add_comm, mul_comm],
reflexivity
end
| (⟨(ref, shape), [], operator.det op⟩::nodes) inputs fref H_pre H_uids H_ps_in_env H_fresh₁ H_fresh₂ H_not_cost :=
begin
dunfold reparameterize graph.to_dist operator.to_dist,
simp [E.E_bind, E.E_ret],
definev x : T shape := op^.f (env.get_ks [] inputs),
assertv H_pre_next : reparameterize_pre fref.2 nodes (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) := by apply H_pre,
assertv H_ps_in_env_next : all_parents_in_env (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) nodes := H_ps_in_env^.right _,
assertv H_fresh₁_next : ¬ env.has_key fref (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) := env_not_has_key_insert (ne_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂) H_fresh₁,
assertv H_fresh₂_next : fref ∉ map node.ref nodes := not_mem_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂,
apply (reparameterize_correct _ _ fref H_pre_next (H_uids^.right _) H_ps_in_env_next H_fresh₁_next H_fresh₂_next H_not_cost)
end
| (⟨(ref, shape), [], operator.rand op⟩::nodes) inputs fref H_pre H_uids H_ps_in_env H_fresh₁ H_fresh₂ H_not_cost :=
begin
dunfold reparameterize graph.to_dist,
simp [E.E_bind],
apply congr_arg, apply funext, intro x,
assertv H_pre_next : reparameterize_pre fref.2 nodes (env.insert (ref, shape) (dvec.head x) inputs) := by apply H_pre,
assertv H_ps_in_env_next : all_parents_in_env (env.insert (ref, shape) (dvec.head x) inputs) nodes := H_ps_in_env^.right x^.head,
assertv H_fresh₁_next : ¬ env.has_key fref (env.insert (ref, shape) x^.head inputs) := env_not_has_key_insert (ne_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂) H_fresh₁,
assertv H_fresh₂_next : fref ∉ map node.ref nodes := not_mem_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂,
apply (reparameterize_correct _ _ fref H_pre_next (H_uids^.right _) H_ps_in_env_next H_fresh₁_next H_fresh₂_next H_not_cost)
end
| (⟨(ref, shape), [(parent₁, shape₁)], operator.det op⟩::nodes) inputs fref H_pre H_uids H_ps_in_env H_fresh₁ H_fresh₂ H_not_cost :=
begin
dunfold reparameterize graph.to_dist operator.to_dist,
simp [E.E_bind, E.E_ret],
definev x : T shape := det.op.f op (env.get_ks [(parent₁, shape₁)] inputs),
assertv H_pre_next : reparameterize_pre fref.2 nodes (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) := by apply H_pre,
assertv H_ps_in_env_next : all_parents_in_env (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) nodes := H_ps_in_env^.right x,
assertv H_fresh₁_next : ¬ env.has_key fref (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) := env_not_has_key_insert (ne_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂) H_fresh₁,
assertv H_fresh₂_next : fref ∉ map node.ref nodes := not_mem_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂,
apply (reparameterize_correct _ _ fref H_pre_next (H_uids^.right _) H_ps_in_env_next H_fresh₁_next H_fresh₂_next H_not_cost)
end
| (⟨(ref, shape), [(parent₁, shape₁), (parent₂, shape₂)], operator.det op⟩::nodes) inputs fref H_pre H_uids H_ps_in_env H_fresh₁ H_fresh₂ H_not_cost :=
begin
dunfold reparameterize graph.to_dist operator.to_dist,
simp [E.E_bind, E.E_ret],
definev x : T shape := det.op.f op (env.get_ks [(parent₁, shape₁), (parent₂, shape₂)] inputs),
assertv H_pre_next : reparameterize_pre fref.2 nodes (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) := by apply H_pre,
assertv H_ps_in_env_next : all_parents_in_env (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) nodes := H_ps_in_env^.right x,
assertv H_fresh₁_next : ¬ env.has_key fref (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) := env_not_has_key_insert (ne_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂) H_fresh₁,
assertv H_fresh₂_next : fref ∉ map node.ref nodes := not_mem_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂,
apply (reparameterize_correct _ _ fref H_pre_next (H_uids^.right _) H_ps_in_env_next H_fresh₁_next H_fresh₂_next H_not_cost)
end
| (⟨(ref, shape), (parent₁, shape₁) :: (parent₂, shape₂) :: (parent₃, shape₃) :: parents, operator.det op⟩::nodes) inputs fref H_pre H_uids H_ps_in_env H_fresh₁ H_fresh₂ H_not_cost :=
begin
dunfold reparameterize graph.to_dist operator.to_dist,
simp [E.E_bind, E.E_ret],
definev x : T shape := det.op.f op (env.get_ks ((parent₁, shape₁) :: (parent₂, shape₂) :: (parent₃, shape₃) :: parents) inputs),
assertv H_pre_next : reparameterize_pre fref.2 nodes (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) := by apply H_pre,
assertv H_ps_in_env_next : all_parents_in_env (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) nodes := H_ps_in_env^.right x,
assertv H_fresh₁_next : ¬ env.has_key fref (env.insert (ref, shape) x inputs) := env_not_has_key_insert (ne_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂) H_fresh₁,
assertv H_fresh₂_next : fref ∉ map node.ref nodes := not_mem_of_not_mem_cons H_fresh₂,
apply (reparameterize_correct _ _ fref H_pre_next (H_uids^.right _) H_ps_in_env_next H_fresh₁_next H_fresh₂_next H_not_cost)
end
def reparam : graph → graph
| g := ⟨reparameterize (ID.str label.ε) g^.nodes, g^.costs, g^.targets, g^.inputs⟩
end certigrad
|
2c46b3a7e0022a4b5220175c51334fc324c99d73 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /tests/lean/run/recInfo1.lean | b2e5a52c6ff5a96da037850ee1e5f1b08dcd6ff4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 527 | lean | import Init.Lean.Meta
open Lean
open Lean.Meta
def print (msg : MessageData) : MetaM Unit :=
trace! `Meta.debug msg
def showRecInfo (declName : Name) (majorPos? : Option Nat := none) : MetaM Unit := do
info ← mkRecursorInfo declName majorPos?;
print (toString info)
set_option trace.Meta true
set_option trace.Meta.isDefEq false
#eval showRecInfo `Acc.recOn
#eval showRecInfo `Prod.casesOn
#eval showRecInfo `List.recOn
#eval showRecInfo `List.casesOn
#eval showRecInfo `List.brecOn
#eval showRecInfo `Iff.elim (some 4)
|
3fdb3195081902360c25439ad606694f41b37f86 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/analysis/complex/conformal.lean | bc434f9a0eb91c277b5b12cff1dac64c4a6f1082 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,866 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yourong Zang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yourong Zang
-/
import analysis.complex.isometry
import analysis.normed_space.conformal_linear_map
/-!
# Conformal maps between complex vector spaces
We prove the sufficient and necessary conditions for a real-linear map between complex vector spaces
to be conformal.
## Main results
* `is_conformal_map_complex_linear`: a nonzero complex linear map into an arbitrary complex
normed space is conformal.
* `is_conformal_map_complex_linear_conj`: the composition of a nonzero complex linear map with
`conj` is complex linear.
* `is_conformal_map_iff_is_complex_or_conj_linear`: a real linear map between the complex
plane is conformal iff it's complex
linear or the composition of
some complex linear map and `conj`.
## Warning
Antiholomorphic functions such as the complex conjugate are considered as conformal functions in
this file.
-/
noncomputable theory
open complex continuous_linear_map
open_locale complex_conjugate
lemma is_conformal_map_conj : is_conformal_map (conj_lie : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ) :=
conj_lie.to_linear_isometry.is_conformal_map
section conformal_into_complex_normed
variables {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [normed_space ℂ E]
{z : ℂ} {g : ℂ →L[ℝ] E} {f : ℂ → E}
lemma is_conformal_map_complex_linear {map : ℂ →L[ℂ] E} (nonzero : map ≠ 0) :
is_conformal_map (map.restrict_scalars ℝ) :=
begin
have minor₁ : ∥map 1∥ ≠ 0,
{ simpa [ext_ring_iff] using nonzero },
refine ⟨∥map 1∥, minor₁, ⟨∥map 1∥⁻¹ • map, _⟩, _⟩,
{ intros x,
simp only [linear_map.smul_apply],
have : x = x • 1 := by rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_one],
nth_rewrite 0 [this],
rw [_root_.coe_coe map, linear_map.coe_coe_is_scalar_tower],
simp only [map.coe_coe, map.map_smul, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_norm],
field_simp [minor₁], },
{ ext1,
simp [minor₁] },
end
lemma is_conformal_map_complex_linear_conj
{map : ℂ →L[ℂ] E} (nonzero : map ≠ 0) :
is_conformal_map ((map.restrict_scalars ℝ).comp (conj_cle : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ)) :=
(is_conformal_map_complex_linear nonzero).comp is_conformal_map_conj
end conformal_into_complex_normed
section conformal_into_complex_plane
open continuous_linear_map
variables {f : ℂ → ℂ} {z : ℂ} {g : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ}
lemma is_conformal_map.is_complex_or_conj_linear (h : is_conformal_map g) :
(∃ (map : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ), map.restrict_scalars ℝ = g) ∨
(∃ (map : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ), map.restrict_scalars ℝ = g ∘L ↑conj_cle) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨c, hc, li, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨li, rfl⟩ : ∃ li' : ℂ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ, li'.to_linear_isometry = li,
from ⟨li.to_linear_isometry_equiv rfl, by { ext1, refl }⟩,
rcases linear_isometry_complex li with ⟨a, rfl|rfl⟩,
-- let rot := c • (a : ℂ) • continuous_linear_map.id ℂ ℂ,
{ refine or.inl ⟨c • (a : ℂ) • continuous_linear_map.id ℂ ℂ, _⟩,
ext1,
simp only [coe_restrict_scalars', smul_apply, linear_isometry.coe_to_continuous_linear_map,
linear_isometry_equiv.coe_to_linear_isometry, rotation_apply, id_apply, smul_eq_mul] },
{ refine or.inr ⟨c • (a : ℂ) • continuous_linear_map.id ℂ ℂ, _⟩,
ext1,
simp only [coe_restrict_scalars', smul_apply, linear_isometry.coe_to_continuous_linear_map,
linear_isometry_equiv.coe_to_linear_isometry, rotation_apply, id_apply, smul_eq_mul,
comp_apply, linear_isometry_equiv.trans_apply, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_coe,
conj_cle_apply, conj_lie_apply, conj_conj] },
end
/-- A real continuous linear map on the complex plane is conformal if and only if the map or its
conjugate is complex linear, and the map is nonvanishing. -/
lemma is_conformal_map_iff_is_complex_or_conj_linear:
is_conformal_map g ↔
((∃ (map : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ), map.restrict_scalars ℝ = g) ∨
(∃ (map : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ), map.restrict_scalars ℝ = g ∘L ↑conj_cle)) ∧ g ≠ 0 :=
begin
split,
{ exact λ h, ⟨h.is_complex_or_conj_linear, h.ne_zero⟩, },
{ rintros ⟨⟨map, rfl⟩ | ⟨map, hmap⟩, h₂⟩,
{ refine is_conformal_map_complex_linear _,
contrapose! h₂ with w,
simp [w] },
{ have minor₁ : g = (map.restrict_scalars ℝ) ∘L ↑conj_cle,
{ ext1,
simp [hmap] },
rw minor₁ at ⊢ h₂,
refine is_conformal_map_complex_linear_conj _,
contrapose! h₂ with w,
simp [w] } }
end
end conformal_into_complex_plane
|
6af622c7954c76aae060f1a0dda2933ad60bc55a | e94d3f31e48d06d252ee7307fe71efe1d500f274 | /hott/types/equiv.hlean | 354deef335432806482caab7513112d9fe421ec4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GallagherCommaJack/lean | e4471240a069d82f97cb361d2bf1a029de3f4256 | 226f8bafeb9baaa5a2ac58000c83d6beb29991e2 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,725,100,482 | 1,459,194,829,000 | 1,459,195,377,000 | 55,377,224 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,459,731,701,000 | 1,459,731,700,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,288 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Ported from Coq HoTT
Theorems about the types equiv and is_equiv
-/
import .fiber .arrow arity ..prop_trunc cubical.square
open eq is_trunc sigma sigma.ops pi fiber function equiv
namespace is_equiv
variables {A B : Type} (f : A → B) [H : is_equiv f]
include H
/- is_equiv f is a mere proposition -/
definition is_contr_fiber_of_is_equiv [instance] (b : B) : is_contr (fiber f b) :=
is_contr.mk
(fiber.mk (f⁻¹ b) (right_inv f b))
(λz, fiber.rec_on z (λa p,
fiber_eq ((ap f⁻¹ p)⁻¹ ⬝ left_inv f a) (calc
right_inv f b = (ap (f ∘ f⁻¹) p)⁻¹ ⬝ ((ap (f ∘ f⁻¹) p) ⬝ right_inv f b)
: by rewrite inv_con_cancel_left
... = (ap (f ∘ f⁻¹) p)⁻¹ ⬝ (right_inv f (f a) ⬝ p) : by rewrite ap_con_eq_con
... = (ap (f ∘ f⁻¹) p)⁻¹ ⬝ (ap f (left_inv f a) ⬝ p) : by rewrite [adj f]
... = (ap (f ∘ f⁻¹) p)⁻¹ ⬝ ap f (left_inv f a) ⬝ p : by rewrite con.assoc
... = (ap f (ap f⁻¹ p))⁻¹ ⬝ ap f (left_inv f a) ⬝ p : by rewrite ap_compose
... = ap f (ap f⁻¹ p)⁻¹ ⬝ ap f (left_inv f a) ⬝ p : by rewrite ap_inv
... = ap f ((ap f⁻¹ p)⁻¹ ⬝ left_inv f a) ⬝ p : by rewrite ap_con)))
definition is_contr_right_inverse : is_contr (Σ(g : B → A), f ∘ g ~ id) :=
begin
fapply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
{apply sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro g, apply eq_equiv_homotopy},
fapply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
{apply fiber.sigma_char},
fapply is_contr_fiber_of_is_equiv,
apply (to_is_equiv (arrow_equiv_arrow_right B (equiv.mk f H))),
end
definition is_contr_right_coherence (u : Σ(g : B → A), f ∘ g ~ id)
: is_contr (Σ(η : u.1 ∘ f ~ id), Π(a : A), u.2 (f a) = ap f (η a)) :=
begin
fapply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
{apply equiv.symm, apply sigma_pi_equiv_pi_sigma},
fapply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
{apply pi_equiv_pi_right, intro a,
apply (fiber_eq_equiv (fiber.mk (u.1 (f a)) (u.2 (f a))) (fiber.mk a idp))},
end
omit H
protected definition sigma_char : (is_equiv f) ≃
(Σ(g : B → A) (ε : f ∘ g ~ id) (η : g ∘ f ~ id), Π(a : A), ε (f a) = ap f (η a)) :=
equiv.MK (λH, ⟨inv f, right_inv f, left_inv f, adj f⟩)
(λp, is_equiv.mk f p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2.1 p.2.2.2)
(λp, begin
induction p with p1 p2,
induction p2 with p21 p22,
induction p22 with p221 p222,
reflexivity
end)
(λH, by induction H; reflexivity)
protected definition sigma_char' : (is_equiv f) ≃
(Σ(u : Σ(g : B → A), f ∘ g ~ id), Σ(η : u.1 ∘ f ~ id), Π(a : A), u.2 (f a) = ap f (η a)) :=
calc
(is_equiv f) ≃
(Σ(g : B → A) (ε : f ∘ g ~ id) (η : g ∘ f ~ id), Π(a : A), ε (f a) = ap f (η a))
: is_equiv.sigma_char
... ≃ (Σ(u : Σ(g : B → A), f ∘ g ~ id), Σ(η : u.1 ∘ f ~ id), Π(a : A), u.2 (f a) = ap f (η a))
: {sigma_assoc_equiv (λu, Σ(η : u.1 ∘ f ~ id), Π(a : A), u.2 (f a) = ap f (η a))}
local attribute is_contr_right_inverse [instance] [priority 1600]
local attribute is_contr_right_coherence [instance] [priority 1600]
theorem is_prop_is_equiv [instance] : is_prop (is_equiv f) :=
is_prop_of_imp_is_contr
(λ(H : is_equiv f), is_trunc_equiv_closed -2 (equiv.symm !is_equiv.sigma_char'))
definition inv_eq_inv {A B : Type} {f f' : A → B} {Hf : is_equiv f} {Hf' : is_equiv f'}
(p : f = f') : f⁻¹ = f'⁻¹ :=
apd011 inv p !is_prop.elim
/- contractible fibers -/
definition is_contr_fun_of_is_equiv [H : is_equiv f] : is_contr_fun f :=
is_contr_fiber_of_is_equiv f
definition is_prop_is_contr_fun (f : A → B) : is_prop (is_contr_fun f) := _
definition is_equiv_of_is_contr_fun [H : is_contr_fun f] : is_equiv f :=
adjointify _ (λb, point (center (fiber f b)))
(λb, point_eq (center (fiber f b)))
(λa, ap point (center_eq (fiber.mk a idp)))
definition is_equiv_of_imp_is_equiv (H : B → is_equiv f) : is_equiv f :=
@is_equiv_of_is_contr_fun _ _ f (λb, @is_contr_fiber_of_is_equiv _ _ _ (H b) _)
definition is_equiv_equiv_is_contr_fun : is_equiv f ≃ is_contr_fun f :=
equiv_of_is_prop _ (λH, !is_equiv_of_is_contr_fun)
end is_equiv
/- Moving equivalences around in homotopies -/
namespace is_equiv
variables {A B C : Type} (f : A → B) [Hf : is_equiv f]
include Hf
section pre_compose
variables (α : A → C) (β : B → C)
-- homotopy_inv_of_homotopy_pre is in init.equiv
protected definition inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_pre.is_equiv
: is_equiv (inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_pre f α β) :=
adjointify _ (homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_pre f α β)
abstract begin
intro q, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
unfold inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_pre,
unfold homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_pre,
apply inverse, apply eq_bot_of_square,
apply eq_hconcat (ap02 α (adj_inv f b)),
apply eq_hconcat (ap_compose α f⁻¹ (right_inv f b))⁻¹,
apply natural_square_tr q (right_inv f b)
end end
abstract begin
intro p, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a,
unfold inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_pre,
unfold homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_pre,
apply trans (con.assoc
(ap α (left_inv f a))⁻¹
(p (f⁻¹ (f a)))
(ap β (right_inv f (f a))))⁻¹,
apply inverse, apply eq_bot_of_square,
refine hconcat_eq _ (ap02 β (adj f a))⁻¹,
refine hconcat_eq _ (ap_compose β f (left_inv f a)),
apply natural_square_tr p (left_inv f a)
end end
end pre_compose
section post_compose
variables (α : C → A) (β : C → B)
-- homotopy_inv_of_homotopy_post is in init.equiv
protected definition inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_post.is_equiv
: is_equiv (inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_post f α β) :=
adjointify _ (homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_post f α β)
abstract begin
intro q, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro c,
unfold inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_post,
unfold homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_post,
apply trans (whisker_right
(ap_con f⁻¹ (right_inv f (β c))⁻¹ (ap f (q c))
⬝ whisker_right (ap_inv f⁻¹ (right_inv f (β c)))
(ap f⁻¹ (ap f (q c)))) (left_inv f (α c))),
apply inverse, apply eq_bot_of_square,
apply eq_hconcat (adj_inv f (β c))⁻¹,
apply eq_vconcat (ap_compose f⁻¹ f (q c))⁻¹,
refine vconcat_eq _ (ap_id (q c)),
apply natural_square (left_inv f) (q c)
end end
abstract begin
intro p, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro c,
unfold inv_homotopy_of_homotopy_post,
unfold homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_post,
apply trans (whisker_left (right_inv f (β c))⁻¹
(ap_con f (ap f⁻¹ (p c)) (left_inv f (α c)))),
apply trans (con.assoc (right_inv f (β c))⁻¹ (ap f (ap f⁻¹ (p c)))
(ap f (left_inv f (α c))))⁻¹,
apply inverse, apply eq_bot_of_square,
refine hconcat_eq _ (adj f (α c)),
apply eq_vconcat (ap_compose f f⁻¹ (p c))⁻¹,
refine vconcat_eq _ (ap_id (p c)),
apply natural_square (right_inv f) (p c)
end end
end post_compose
end is_equiv
namespace is_equiv
/- Theorem 4.7.7 -/
variables {A : Type} {P Q : A → Type}
variable (f : Πa, P a → Q a)
definition is_fiberwise_equiv [reducible] := Πa, is_equiv (f a)
definition is_equiv_total_of_is_fiberwise_equiv [H : is_fiberwise_equiv f] : is_equiv (total f) :=
is_equiv_sigma_functor id f
definition is_fiberwise_equiv_of_is_equiv_total [H : is_equiv (total f)]
: is_fiberwise_equiv f :=
begin
intro a,
apply is_equiv_of_is_contr_fun, intro q,
apply @is_contr_equiv_closed _ _ (fiber_total_equiv f q)
end
end is_equiv
namespace equiv
open is_equiv
variables {A B C : Type}
definition equiv_mk_eq {f f' : A → B} [H : is_equiv f] [H' : is_equiv f'] (p : f = f')
: equiv.mk f H = equiv.mk f' H' :=
apd011 equiv.mk p !is_prop.elim
definition equiv_eq {f f' : A ≃ B} (p : to_fun f = to_fun f') : f = f' :=
by (cases f; cases f'; apply (equiv_mk_eq p))
definition equiv_eq' {f f' : A ≃ B} (p : to_fun f ~ to_fun f') : f = f' :=
by apply equiv_eq;apply eq_of_homotopy p
definition trans_symm (f : A ≃ B) (g : B ≃ C) : (f ⬝e g)⁻¹ᵉ = g⁻¹ᵉ ⬝e f⁻¹ᵉ :> (C ≃ A) :=
equiv_eq idp
definition symm_symm (f : A ≃ B) : f⁻¹ᵉ⁻¹ᵉ = f :> (A ≃ B) :=
equiv_eq idp
protected definition equiv.sigma_char [constructor]
(A B : Type) : (A ≃ B) ≃ Σ(f : A → B), is_equiv f :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{intro F, exact ⟨to_fun F, to_is_equiv F⟩},
{intro p, cases p with f H, exact (equiv.mk f H)},
{intro p, cases p, exact idp},
{intro F, cases F, exact idp},
end
definition equiv_eq_char (f f' : A ≃ B) : (f = f') ≃ (to_fun f = to_fun f') :=
calc
(f = f') ≃ (to_fun !equiv.sigma_char f = to_fun !equiv.sigma_char f')
: eq_equiv_fn_eq (to_fun !equiv.sigma_char)
... ≃ ((to_fun !equiv.sigma_char f).1 = (to_fun !equiv.sigma_char f').1 ) : equiv_subtype
... ≃ (to_fun f = to_fun f') : equiv.refl
definition is_equiv_ap_to_fun (f f' : A ≃ B)
: is_equiv (ap to_fun : f = f' → to_fun f = to_fun f') :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{intro p, cases f with f H, cases f' with f' H', cases p, apply ap (mk f'), apply is_prop.elim},
{intro p, cases f with f H, cases f' with f' H', cases p,
apply @concat _ _ (ap to_fun (ap (equiv.mk f') (is_prop.elim H H'))), {apply idp},
generalize is_prop.elim H H', intro q, cases q, apply idp},
{intro p, cases p, cases f with f H, apply ap (ap (equiv.mk f)), apply is_set.elim}
end
definition equiv_pathover {A : Type} {a a' : A} (p : a = a')
{B : A → Type} {C : A → Type} (f : B a ≃ C a) (g : B a' ≃ C a')
(r : Π(b : B a) (b' : B a') (q : b =[p] b'), f b =[p] g b') : f =[p] g :=
begin
fapply pathover_of_fn_pathover_fn,
{ intro a, apply equiv.sigma_char},
{ fapply sigma_pathover,
esimp, apply arrow_pathover, exact r,
apply is_prop.elimo}
end
definition is_contr_equiv (A B : Type) [HA : is_contr A] [HB : is_contr B] : is_contr (A ≃ B) :=
begin
apply @is_contr_of_inhabited_prop, apply is_prop.mk,
intro x y, cases x with fx Hx, cases y with fy Hy, generalize Hy,
apply (eq_of_homotopy (λ a, !eq_of_is_contr)) ▸ (λ Hy, !is_prop.elim ▸ rfl),
apply equiv_of_is_contr_of_is_contr
end
definition is_trunc_succ_equiv (n : trunc_index) (A B : Type)
[HA : is_trunc n.+1 A] [HB : is_trunc n.+1 B] : is_trunc n.+1 (A ≃ B) :=
@is_trunc_equiv_closed _ _ n.+1 (equiv.symm !equiv.sigma_char)
(@is_trunc_sigma _ _ _ _ (λ f, !is_trunc_succ_of_is_prop))
definition is_trunc_equiv (n : trunc_index) (A B : Type)
[HA : is_trunc n A] [HB : is_trunc n B] : is_trunc n (A ≃ B) :=
by cases n; apply !is_contr_equiv; apply !is_trunc_succ_equiv
end equiv
|
9b560c8fd8f909a3f626caab5dd7480f1bde9aa8 | 38ee9024fb5974f555fb578fcf5a5a7b71e669b5 | /Mathlib/Data/String/Defs.lean | 678fba5272def22387dae575f567ab45706c6cd2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | denayd/mathlib4 | 750e0dcd106554640a1ac701e51517501a574715 | 7f40a5c514066801ab3c6d431e9f405baa9b9c58 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,743,991,894 | 1,636,618,048,000 | 1,636,618,048,000 | 373,926,241 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 533 | lean | import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
namespace String
/-- pad `s : String` with repeated occurrences of `c : Char` until it's of length `n`.
If `s` is initially larger than `n`, just return `s`. -/
def leftpad (n : Nat) (c : Char) (s : String) : String :=
⟨List.leftpad n c s.data⟩
def repeat (c : Char) (n : Nat) : String := ⟨List.repeat c n⟩
def isPrefix : String -> String -> Prop
| ⟨d1⟩, ⟨d2⟩ => List.isPrefix d1 d2
def isSuffix : String -> String -> Prop
| ⟨d1⟩, ⟨d2⟩ => List.isSuffix d1 d2
end String
|
3466ec8881c5151a3dc2c1b3283b3d293e9d02a7 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/analysis/normed_space/dual.lean | 929ece5d46b86a331b152ca534f0f57200db8ce5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,369 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import analysis.normed_space.hahn_banach
/-!
# The topological dual of a normed space
In this file we define the topological dual of a normed space, and the bounded linear map from
a normed space into its double dual.
We also prove that, for base field such as the real or the complex numbers, this map is an isometry.
More generically, this is proved for any field in the class `has_exists_extension_norm_eq`, i.e.,
satisfying the Hahn-Banach theorem.
-/
noncomputable theory
universes u v
namespace normed_space
section general
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
variables (E : Type*) [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
/-- The topological dual of a normed space `E`. -/
@[derive [has_coe_to_fun, normed_group, normed_space 𝕜]] def dual := E →L[𝕜] 𝕜
instance : inhabited (dual 𝕜 E) := ⟨0⟩
/-- The inclusion of a normed space in its double (topological) dual. -/
def inclusion_in_double_dual' (x : E) : (dual 𝕜 (dual 𝕜 E)) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ f, f x,
map_add' := by simp,
map_smul' := by simp }
∥x∥
(λ f, by { rw mul_comm, exact f.le_op_norm x } )
@[simp] lemma dual_def (x : E) (f : dual 𝕜 E) :
((inclusion_in_double_dual' 𝕜 E) x) f = f x := rfl
lemma double_dual_bound (x : E) : ∥(inclusion_in_double_dual' 𝕜 E) x∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
begin
apply continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_bound,
{ simp },
{ intros f, rw mul_comm, exact f.le_op_norm x, }
end
/-- The inclusion of a normed space in its double (topological) dual, considered
as a bounded linear map. -/
def inclusion_in_double_dual : E →L[𝕜] (dual 𝕜 (dual 𝕜 E)) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ (x : E), (inclusion_in_double_dual' 𝕜 E) x,
map_add' := λ x y, by { ext, simp },
map_smul' := λ (c : 𝕜) x, by { ext, simp } }
1
(λ x, by { convert double_dual_bound _ _ _, simp } )
end general
section bidual_isometry
variables {𝕜 : Type v} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_algebra ℝ 𝕜]
[has_exists_extension_norm_eq.{u} 𝕜]
{E : Type u} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
/-- If one controls the norm of every `f x`, then one controls the norm of `x`.
Compare `continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_bound`. -/
lemma norm_le_dual_bound (x : E) {M : ℝ} (hMp: 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ (f : dual 𝕜 E), ∥f x∥ ≤ M * ∥f∥) :
∥x∥ ≤ M :=
begin
classical,
by_cases h : x = 0,
{ simp only [h, hMp, norm_zero] },
{ obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ : ∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, _ := exists_dual_vector x h,
calc ∥x∥ = ∥norm' 𝕜 x∥ : (norm_norm' _ _ _).symm
... = ∥f x∥ : by rw hf.2
... ≤ M * ∥f∥ : hM f
... = M : by rw [hf.1, mul_one] }
end
/-- The inclusion of a real normed space in its double dual is an isometry onto its image.-/
lemma inclusion_in_double_dual_isometry (x : E) : ∥inclusion_in_double_dual 𝕜 E x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ exact double_dual_bound 𝕜 E x },
{ rw continuous_linear_map.norm_def,
apply real.lb_le_Inf _ continuous_linear_map.bounds_nonempty,
rintros c ⟨hc1, hc2⟩,
exact norm_le_dual_bound x hc1 hc2 },
end
end bidual_isometry
end normed_space
|
01bcefb92588d760f7804c7cad5b8281995faf72 | 1abd1ed12aa68b375cdef28959f39531c6e95b84 | /src/measure_theory/measure/outer_measure.lean | f3fe71156e5e6b9213574bda7617b220303c03ab | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jumpy4/mathlib | d3829e75173012833e9f15ac16e481e17596de0f | af36f1a35f279f0e5b3c2a77647c6bf2cfd51a13 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,508,842,818 | 1,636,203,271,000 | 1,636,203,271,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 61,741 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import analysis.specific_limits
import measure_theory.pi_system
import data.matrix.notation
import topology.algebra.infinite_sum
/-!
# Outer Measures
An outer measure is a function `μ : set α → ℝ≥0∞`, from the powerset of a type to the extended
nonnegative real numbers that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is monotone;
3. `μ` is countably subadditive. This means that the outer measure of a countable union is at most
the sum of the outer measure on the individual sets.
Note that we do not need `α` to be measurable to define an outer measure.
The outer measures on a type `α` form a complete lattice.
Given an arbitrary function `m : set α → ℝ≥0∞` that sends `∅` to `0` we can define an outer
measure on `α` that on `s` is defined to be the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (sᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`sᵢ` that cover `s`. This is the unique maximal outer measure that is at most the given function.
We also define this for functions `m` defined on a subset of `set α`, by treating the function as
having value `∞` outside its domain.
Given an outer measure `m`, the Carathéodory-measurable sets are the sets `s` such that
for all sets `t` we have `m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)`. This forms a measurable space.
## Main definitions and statements
* `outer_measure.bounded_by` is the greatest outer measure that is at most the given function.
If you know that the given functions sends `∅` to `0`, then `outer_measure.of_function` is a
special case.
* `caratheodory` is the Carathéodory-measurable space of an outer measure.
* `Inf_eq_of_function_Inf_gen` is a characterization of the infimum of outer measures.
* `induced_outer_measure` is the measure induced by a function on a subset of `set α`
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carath%C3%A9odory%27s_criterion>
## Tags
outer measure, Carathéodory-measurable, Carathéodory's criterion
-/
noncomputable theory
open set finset function filter encodable
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal topological_space ennreal
namespace measure_theory
/-- An outer measure is a countably subadditive monotone function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
structure outer_measure (α : Type*) :=
(measure_of : set α → ℝ≥0∞)
(empty : measure_of ∅ = 0)
(mono : ∀{s₁ s₂}, s₁ ⊆ s₂ → measure_of s₁ ≤ measure_of s₂)
(Union_nat : ∀(s:ℕ → set α), measure_of (⋃i, s i) ≤ ∑'i, measure_of (s i))
namespace outer_measure
section basic
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ms : set (outer_measure α)} {m : outer_measure α}
instance : has_coe_to_fun (outer_measure α) (λ _, set α → ℝ≥0∞) := ⟨λ m, m.measure_of⟩
@[simp] lemma measure_of_eq_coe (m : outer_measure α) : m.measure_of = m := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty' (m : outer_measure α) : m ∅ = 0 := m.empty
theorem mono' (m : outer_measure α) {s₁ s₂}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : m s₁ ≤ m s₂ := m.mono h
protected theorem Union (m : outer_measure α)
{β} [encodable β] (s : β → set α) :
m (⋃i, s i) ≤ ∑'i, m (s i) :=
rel_supr_tsum m m.empty (≤) m.Union_nat s
lemma Union_null (m : outer_measure α)
{β} [encodable β] {s : β → set α} (h : ∀ i, m (s i) = 0) : m (⋃i, s i) = 0 :=
by simpa [h] using m.Union s
protected lemma Union_finset (m : outer_measure α) (s : β → set α) (t : finset β) :
m (⋃i ∈ t, s i) ≤ ∑ i in t, m (s i) :=
rel_supr_sum m m.empty (≤) m.Union_nat s t
protected lemma union (m : outer_measure α) (s₁ s₂ : set α) :
m (s₁ ∪ s₂) ≤ m s₁ + m s₂ :=
rel_sup_add m m.empty (≤) m.Union_nat s₁ s₂
/-- If `s : ι → set α` is a sequence of sets, `S = ⋃ n, s n`, and `m (S \ s n)` tends to zero along
some nontrivial filter (usually `at_top` on `α = ℕ`), then `m S = ⨆ n, m (s n)`. -/
lemma Union_of_tendsto_zero {ι} (m : outer_measure α) {s : ι → set α}
(l : filter ι) [ne_bot l] (h0 : tendsto (λ k, m ((⋃ n, s n) \ s k)) l (𝓝 0)) :
m (⋃ n, s n) = ⨆ n, m (s n) :=
begin
set S := ⋃ n, s n,
set M := ⨆ n, m (s n),
have hsS : ∀ {k}, s k ⊆ S, from λ k, subset_Union _ _,
refine le_antisymm _ (supr_le $ λ n, m.mono hsS),
have A : ∀ k, m S ≤ M + m (S \ s k), from λ k,
calc m S = m (s k ∪ S \ s k) : by rw [union_diff_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_left hsS]
... ≤ m (s k) + m (S \ s k) : m.union _ _
... ≤ M + m (S \ s k) : add_le_add_right (le_supr _ k) _,
have B : tendsto (λ k, M + m (S \ s k)) l (𝓝 (M + 0)), from tendsto_const_nhds.add h0,
rw add_zero at B,
exact ge_of_tendsto' B A
end
/-- If `s : ℕ → set α` is a monotone sequence of sets such that `∑' k, m (s (k + 1) \ s k) ≠ ∞`,
then `m (⋃ n, s n) = ⨆ n, m (s n)`. -/
lemma Union_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top (m : outer_measure α) {s : ℕ → set α}
(h_mono : ∀ n, s n ⊆ s (n + 1)) (h0 : ∑' k, m (s (k + 1) \ s k) ≠ ∞) :
m (⋃ n, s n) = ⨆ n, m (s n) :=
begin
refine m.Union_of_tendsto_zero at_top _,
refine tendsto_nhds_bot_mono' (ennreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add _ h0) (λ n, _),
refine (m.mono _).trans (m.Union _),
/- Current goal: `(⋃ k, s k) \ s n ⊆ ⋃ k, s (k + n + 1) \ s (k + n)` -/
have h' : monotone s := @monotone_nat_of_le_succ (set α) _ _ h_mono,
simp only [diff_subset_iff, Union_subset_iff],
intros i x hx,
rcases nat.find_x ⟨i, hx⟩ with ⟨j, hj, hlt⟩, clear hx i,
cases le_or_lt j n with hjn hnj, { exact or.inl (h' hjn hj) },
have : j - (n + 1) + n + 1 = j,
by rw [add_assoc, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hnj.nat_succ_le],
refine or.inr (mem_Union.2 ⟨j - (n + 1), _, hlt _ _⟩),
{ rwa this },
{ rw [← nat.succ_le_iff, nat.succ_eq_add_one, this] }
end
lemma le_inter_add_diff {m : outer_measure α} {t : set α} (s : set α) :
m t ≤ m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s) :=
by { convert m.union _ _, rw inter_union_diff t s }
lemma diff_null (m : outer_measure α) (s : set α) {t : set α} (ht : m t = 0) :
m (s \ t) = m s :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (m.mono $ diff_subset _ _) _,
calc m s ≤ m (s ∩ t) + m (s \ t) : le_inter_add_diff _
... ≤ m t + m (s \ t) : add_le_add_right (m.mono $ inter_subset_right _ _) _
... = m (s \ t) : by rw [ht, zero_add]
end
lemma union_null (m : outer_measure α) {s₁ s₂ : set α}
(h₁ : m s₁ = 0) (h₂ : m s₂ = 0) : m (s₁ ∪ s₂) = 0 :=
by simpa [h₁, h₂] using m.union s₁ s₂
lemma coe_fn_injective : injective (λ (μ : outer_measure α) (s : set α), μ s) :=
λ μ₁ μ₂ h, by { cases μ₁, cases μ₂, congr, exact h }
@[ext] lemma ext {μ₁ μ₂ : outer_measure α} (h : ∀ s, μ₁ s = μ₂ s) : μ₁ = μ₂ :=
coe_fn_injective $ funext h
/-- A version of `measure_theory.outer_measure.ext` that assumes `μ₁ s = μ₂ s` on all *nonempty*
sets `s`, and gets `μ₁ ∅ = μ₂ ∅` from `measure_theory.outer_measure.empty'`. -/
lemma ext_nonempty {μ₁ μ₂ : outer_measure α} (h : ∀ s : set α, s.nonempty → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) :
μ₁ = μ₂ :=
ext $ λ s, s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ he, by rw [he, empty', empty']) (h s)
instance : has_zero (outer_measure α) :=
⟨{ measure_of := λ_, 0,
empty := rfl,
mono := assume _ _ _, le_refl 0,
Union_nat := assume s, zero_le _ }⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : outer_measure α) = 0 := rfl
instance : inhabited (outer_measure α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_add (outer_measure α) :=
⟨λm₁ m₂,
{ measure_of := λs, m₁ s + m₂ s,
empty := show m₁ ∅ + m₂ ∅ = 0, by simp [outer_measure.empty],
mono := assume s₁ s₂ h, add_le_add (m₁.mono h) (m₂.mono h),
Union_nat := assume s,
calc m₁ (⋃i, s i) + m₂ (⋃i, s i) ≤
(∑'i, m₁ (s i)) + (∑'i, m₂ (s i)) :
add_le_add (m₁.Union_nat s) (m₂.Union_nat s)
... = _ : ennreal.tsum_add.symm}⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_add (m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α) : ⇑(m₁ + m₂) = m₁ + m₂ := rfl
theorem add_apply (m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α) (s : set α) : (m₁ + m₂) s = m₁ s + m₂ s := rfl
instance add_comm_monoid : add_comm_monoid (outer_measure α) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
.. injective.add_comm_monoid (show outer_measure α → set α → ℝ≥0∞, from coe_fn)
coe_fn_injective rfl (λ _ _, rfl) }
instance : has_scalar ℝ≥0∞ (outer_measure α) :=
⟨λ c m,
{ measure_of := λ s, c * m s,
empty := by simp,
mono := λ s t h, ennreal.mul_left_mono $ m.mono h,
Union_nat := λ s, by { rw [ennreal.tsum_mul_left], exact ennreal.mul_left_mono (m.Union _) } }⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) (m : outer_measure α) : ⇑(c • m) = c • m := rfl
lemma smul_apply (c : ℝ≥0∞) (m : outer_measure α) (s : set α) : (c • m) s = c * m s := rfl
instance : module ℝ≥0∞ (outer_measure α) :=
{ smul := (•),
.. injective.module ℝ≥0∞ ⟨show outer_measure α → set α → ℝ≥0∞, from coe_fn, coe_zero,
coe_add⟩ coe_fn_injective coe_smul }
instance : has_bot (outer_measure α) := ⟨0⟩
instance outer_measure.order_bot : order_bot (outer_measure α) :=
{ le := λm₁ m₂, ∀s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s,
bot := 0,
le_refl := assume a s, le_refl _,
le_trans := assume a b c hab hbc s, le_trans (hab s) (hbc s),
le_antisymm := assume a b hab hba, ext $ assume s, le_antisymm (hab s) (hba s),
bot_le := assume a s, zero_le _ }
section supremum
instance : has_Sup (outer_measure α) :=
⟨λms, {
measure_of := λs, ⨆ m ∈ ms, (m : outer_measure α) s,
empty := nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 $ bsupr_le $ λ m h, le_of_eq m.empty,
mono := assume s₁ s₂ hs, bsupr_le_bsupr $ assume m hm, m.mono hs,
Union_nat := assume f, bsupr_le $ assume m hm,
calc m (⋃i, f i) ≤ ∑' (i : ℕ), m (f i) : m.Union_nat _
... ≤ ∑'i, (⨆ m ∈ ms, (m : outer_measure α) (f i)) :
ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ assume i, le_bsupr m hm }⟩
instance : complete_lattice (outer_measure α) :=
{ .. outer_measure.order_bot, .. complete_lattice_of_Sup (outer_measure α)
(λ ms, ⟨λ m hm s, le_bsupr m hm, λ m hm s, bsupr_le (λ m' hm', hm hm' s)⟩) }
@[simp] theorem Sup_apply (ms : set (outer_measure α)) (s : set α) :
(Sup ms) s = ⨆ m ∈ ms, (m : outer_measure α) s := rfl
@[simp] theorem supr_apply {ι} (f : ι → outer_measure α) (s : set α) :
(⨆ i : ι, f i) s = ⨆ i, f i s :=
by rw [supr, Sup_apply, supr_range, supr]
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_supr {ι} (f : ι → outer_measure α) :
⇑(⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, f i :=
funext $ λ s, by rw [supr_apply, _root_.supr_apply]
@[simp] theorem sup_apply (m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α) (s : set α) :
(m₁ ⊔ m₂) s = m₁ s ⊔ m₂ s :=
by have := supr_apply (λ b, cond b m₁ m₂) s;
rwa [supr_bool_eq, supr_bool_eq] at this
theorem smul_supr {ι} (f : ι → outer_measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
c • (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, c • f i :=
ext $ λ s, by simp only [smul_apply, supr_apply, ennreal.mul_supr]
end supremum
@[mono] lemma mono'' {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α} {s₁ s₂ : set α} (hm : m₁ ≤ m₂) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
m₁ s₁ ≤ m₂ s₂ :=
(hm s₁).trans (m₂.mono hs)
/-- The pushforward of `m` along `f`. The outer measure on `s` is defined to be `m (f ⁻¹' s)`. -/
def map {β} (f : α → β) : outer_measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] outer_measure β :=
{ to_fun := λ m,
{ measure_of := λs, m (f ⁻¹' s),
empty := m.empty,
mono := λ s t h, m.mono (preimage_mono h),
Union_nat := λ s, by rw [preimage_Union]; exact
m.Union_nat (λ i, f ⁻¹' s i) },
map_add' := λ m₁ m₂, coe_fn_injective rfl,
map_smul' := λ c m, coe_fn_injective rfl }
@[simp] theorem map_apply {β} (f : α → β)
(m : outer_measure α) (s : set β) : map f m s = m (f ⁻¹' s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_id (m : outer_measure α) : map id m = m :=
ext $ λ s, rfl
@[simp] theorem map_map {β γ} (f : α → β) (g : β → γ)
(m : outer_measure α) : map g (map f m) = map (g ∘ f) m :=
ext $ λ s, rfl
@[mono] theorem map_mono {β} (f : α → β) : monotone (map f) :=
λ m m' h s, h _
@[simp] theorem map_sup {β} (f : α → β) (m m' : outer_measure α) :
map f (m ⊔ m') = map f m ⊔ map f m' :=
ext $ λ s, by simp only [map_apply, sup_apply]
@[simp] theorem map_supr {β ι} (f : α → β) (m : ι → outer_measure α) :
map f (⨆ i, m i) = ⨆ i, map f (m i) :=
ext $ λ s, by simp only [map_apply, supr_apply]
instance : functor outer_measure := {map := λ α β f, map f}
instance : is_lawful_functor outer_measure :=
{ id_map := λ α, map_id,
comp_map := λ α β γ f g m, (map_map f g m).symm }
/-- The dirac outer measure. -/
def dirac (a : α) : outer_measure α :=
{ measure_of := λs, indicator s (λ _, 1) a,
empty := by simp,
mono := λ s t h, indicator_le_indicator_of_subset h (λ _, zero_le _) a,
Union_nat := λ s,
if hs : a ∈ ⋃ n, s n then let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_Union.1 hs in
calc indicator (⋃ n, s n) (λ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) a = 1 : indicator_of_mem hs _
... = indicator (s i) (λ _, 1) a : (indicator_of_mem hi _).symm
... ≤ ∑' n, indicator (s n) (λ _, 1) a : ennreal.le_tsum _
else by simp only [indicator_of_not_mem hs, zero_le]}
@[simp] theorem dirac_apply (a : α) (s : set α) :
dirac a s = indicator s (λ _, 1) a := rfl
/-- The sum of an (arbitrary) collection of outer measures. -/
def sum {ι} (f : ι → outer_measure α) : outer_measure α :=
{ measure_of := λs, ∑' i, f i s,
empty := by simp,
mono := λ s t h, ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ i, (f i).mono' h),
Union_nat := λ s, by rw ennreal.tsum_comm; exact
ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ i, (f i).Union_nat _) }
@[simp] theorem sum_apply {ι} (f : ι → outer_measure α) (s : set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := rfl
theorem smul_dirac_apply (a : ℝ≥0∞) (b : α) (s : set α) :
(a • dirac b) s = indicator s (λ _, a) b :=
by simp only [smul_apply, dirac_apply, ← indicator_mul_right _ (λ _, a), mul_one]
/-- Pullback of an `outer_measure`: `comap f μ s = μ (f '' s)`. -/
def comap {β} (f : α → β) : outer_measure β →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] outer_measure α :=
{ to_fun := λ m,
{ measure_of := λ s, m (f '' s),
empty := by simp,
mono := λ s t h, m.mono $ image_subset f h,
Union_nat := λ s, by { rw [image_Union], apply m.Union_nat } },
map_add' := λ m₁ m₂, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c m, rfl }
@[simp] lemma comap_apply {β} (f : α → β) (m : outer_measure β) (s : set α) :
comap f m s = m (f '' s) :=
rfl
@[mono] lemma comap_mono {β} (f : α → β) :
monotone (comap f) :=
λ m m' h s, h _
@[simp] theorem comap_supr {β ι} (f : α → β) (m : ι → outer_measure β) :
comap f (⨆ i, m i) = ⨆ i, comap f (m i) :=
ext $ λ s, by simp only [comap_apply, supr_apply]
/-- Restrict an `outer_measure` to a set. -/
def restrict (s : set α) : outer_measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] outer_measure α :=
(map coe).comp (comap (coe : s → α))
@[simp] lemma restrict_apply (s t : set α) (m : outer_measure α) :
restrict s m t = m (t ∩ s) :=
by simp [restrict]
@[mono] lemma restrict_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) {m m' : outer_measure α} (hm : m ≤ m') :
restrict s m ≤ restrict t m' :=
λ u, by { simp only [restrict_apply], exact (hm _).trans (m'.mono $ inter_subset_inter_right _ h) }
@[simp] lemma restrict_univ (m : outer_measure α) : restrict univ m = m := ext $ λ s, by simp
@[simp] lemma restrict_empty (m : outer_measure α) : restrict ∅ m = 0 := ext $ λ s, by simp
@[simp] lemma restrict_supr {ι} (s : set α) (m : ι → outer_measure α) :
restrict s (⨆ i, m i) = ⨆ i, restrict s (m i) :=
by simp [restrict]
lemma map_comap {β} (f : α → β) (m : outer_measure β) :
map f (comap f m) = restrict (range f) m :=
ext $ λ s, congr_arg m $ by simp only [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, subtype.range_coe]
lemma map_comap_le {β} (f : α → β) (m : outer_measure β) :
map f (comap f m) ≤ m :=
λ s, m.mono $ image_preimage_subset _ _
lemma restrict_le_self (m : outer_measure α) (s : set α) :
restrict s m ≤ m :=
map_comap_le _ _
@[simp] lemma map_le_restrict_range {β} {ma : outer_measure α} {mb : outer_measure β} {f : α → β} :
map f ma ≤ restrict (range f) mb ↔ map f ma ≤ mb :=
⟨λ h, h.trans (restrict_le_self _ _), λ h s, by simpa using h (s ∩ range f)⟩
lemma map_comap_of_surjective {β} {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) (m : outer_measure β) :
map f (comap f m) = m :=
ext $ λ s, by rw [map_apply, comap_apply, hf.image_preimage]
lemma le_comap_map {β} (f : α → β) (m : outer_measure α) :
m ≤ comap f (map f m) :=
λ s, m.mono $ subset_preimage_image _ _
lemma comap_map {β} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) (m : outer_measure α) :
comap f (map f m) = m :=
ext $ λ s, by rw [comap_apply, map_apply, hf.preimage_image]
@[simp] theorem top_apply {s : set α} (h : s.nonempty) : (⊤ : outer_measure α) s = ∞ :=
let ⟨a, as⟩ := h in
top_unique $ le_trans (by simp [smul_dirac_apply, as]) (le_bsupr (∞ • dirac a) trivial)
theorem top_apply' (s : set α) : (⊤ : outer_measure α) s = ⨅ (h : s = ∅), 0 :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ h, by simp [h]) (λ h, by simp [h, h.ne_empty])
@[simp] theorem comap_top (f : α → β) : comap f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
ext_nonempty $ λ s hs, by rw [comap_apply, top_apply hs, top_apply (hs.image _)]
theorem map_top (f : α → β) : map f ⊤ = restrict (range f) ⊤ :=
ext $ λ s, by rw [map_apply, restrict_apply, ← image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
top_apply', top_apply', set.image_eq_empty]
theorem map_top_of_surjective (f : α → β) (hf : surjective f) : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
by rw [map_top, hf.range_eq, restrict_univ]
end basic
section of_function
set_option eqn_compiler.zeta true
variables {α : Type*} (m : set α → ℝ≥0∞) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0)
include m_empty
/-- Given any function `m` assigning measures to sets satisying `m ∅ = 0`, there is
a unique maximal outer measure `μ` satisfying `μ s ≤ m s` for all `s : set α`. -/
protected def of_function : outer_measure α :=
let μ := λs, ⨅{f : ℕ → set α} (h : s ⊆ ⋃i, f i), ∑'i, m (f i) in
{ measure_of := μ,
empty := le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le (λ_, ∅) $ infi_le_of_le (empty_subset _) $ by simp [m_empty])
(zero_le _),
mono := assume s₁ s₂ hs, infi_le_infi $ assume f,
infi_le_infi2 $ assume hb, ⟨subset.trans hs hb, le_refl _⟩,
Union_nat := assume s, ennreal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add $ begin
assume ε hε (hb : ∑'i, μ (s i) < ∞),
rcases ennreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable (ennreal.coe_pos.2 hε).ne' ℕ with ⟨ε', hε', hl⟩,
refine le_trans _ (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt hl) _),
rw ← ennreal.tsum_add,
choose f hf using show
∀i, ∃f:ℕ → set α, s i ⊆ (⋃i, f i) ∧ ∑'i, m (f i) < μ (s i) + ε' i,
{ intro,
have : μ (s i) < μ (s i) + ε' i :=
ennreal.lt_add_right
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb.ne $ ennreal.le_tsum _)
(by simpa using (hε' i).ne'),
simpa [μ, infi_lt_iff] },
refine le_trans _ (ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ i, le_of_lt (hf i).2),
rw [← ennreal.tsum_prod, ← equiv.nat_prod_nat_equiv_nat.symm.tsum_eq],
swap, {apply_instance},
refine infi_le_of_le _ (infi_le _ _),
exact Union_subset (λ i, subset.trans (hf i).1 $
Union_subset $ λ j, subset.trans (by simp) $
subset_Union _ $ equiv.nat_prod_nat_equiv_nat (i, j)),
end }
lemma of_function_apply (s : set α) :
outer_measure.of_function m m_empty s =
(⨅ (t : ℕ → set α) (h : s ⊆ Union t), ∑' n, m (t n)) := rfl
variables {m m_empty}
theorem of_function_le (s : set α) : outer_measure.of_function m m_empty s ≤ m s :=
let f : ℕ → set α := λi, nat.cases_on i s (λ _, ∅) in
infi_le_of_le f $ infi_le_of_le (subset_Union f 0) $ le_of_eq $
tsum_eq_single 0 $ by rintro (_|i); simp [f, m_empty]
theorem of_function_eq (s : set α) (m_mono : ∀ ⦃t : set α⦄, s ⊆ t → m s ≤ m t)
(m_subadd : ∀ (s : ℕ → set α), m (⋃i, s i) ≤ ∑'i, m (s i)) :
outer_measure.of_function m m_empty s = m s :=
le_antisymm (of_function_le s) $ le_infi $ λ f, le_infi $ λ hf, le_trans (m_mono hf) (m_subadd f)
theorem le_of_function {μ : outer_measure α} :
μ ≤ outer_measure.of_function m m_empty ↔ ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s :=
⟨λ H s, le_trans (H s) (of_function_le s),
λ H s, le_infi $ λ f, le_infi $ λ hs,
le_trans (μ.mono hs) $ le_trans (μ.Union f) $
ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ i, H _⟩
lemma is_greatest_of_function :
is_greatest {μ : outer_measure α | ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s} (outer_measure.of_function m m_empty) :=
⟨λ s, of_function_le _, λ μ, le_of_function.2⟩
lemma of_function_eq_Sup : outer_measure.of_function m m_empty = Sup {μ | ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s} :=
(@is_greatest_of_function α m m_empty).is_lub.Sup_eq.symm
/-- If `m u = ∞` for any set `u` that has nonempty intersection both with `s` and `t`, then
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`, where `μ = measure_theory.outer_measure.of_function m m_empty`.
E.g., if `α` is an (e)metric space and `m u = ∞` on any set of diameter `≥ r`, then this lemma
implies that `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` on any two sets such that `r ≤ edist x y` for all `x ∈ s`
and `y ∈ t`. -/
lemma of_function_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter {s t : set α}
(h : ∀ u, (s ∩ u).nonempty → (t ∩ u).nonempty → m u = ∞) :
outer_measure.of_function m m_empty (s ∪ t) =
outer_measure.of_function m m_empty s + outer_measure.of_function m m_empty t :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (outer_measure.union _ _ _) (le_infi $ λ f, le_infi $ λ hf, _),
set μ := outer_measure.of_function m m_empty,
rcases em (∃ i, (s ∩ f i).nonempty ∧ (t ∩ f i).nonempty) with ⟨i, hs, ht⟩|he,
{ calc μ s + μ t ≤ ∞ : le_top
... = m (f i) : (h (f i) hs ht).symm
... ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) : ennreal.le_tsum i },
set I := λ s, {i : ℕ | (s ∩ f i).nonempty},
have hd : disjoint (I s) (I t), from λ i hi, he ⟨i, hi⟩,
have hI : ∀ u ⊆ s ∪ t, μ u ≤ ∑' i : I u, μ (f i), from λ u hu,
calc μ u ≤ μ (⋃ i : I u, f i) :
μ.mono (λ x hx, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_Union.1 (hf (hu hx)) in mem_Union.2 ⟨⟨i, ⟨x, hx, hi⟩⟩, hi⟩)
... ≤ ∑' i : I u, μ (f i) : μ.Union _,
calc μ s + μ t ≤ (∑' i : I s, μ (f i)) + (∑' i : I t, μ (f i)) :
add_le_add (hI _ $ subset_union_left _ _) (hI _ $ subset_union_right _ _)
... = ∑' i : I s ∪ I t, μ (f i) :
(@tsum_union_disjoint _ _ _ _ _ (λ i, μ (f i)) _ _ _ hd ennreal.summable ennreal.summable).symm
... ≤ ∑' i, μ (f i) :
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj coe subtype.coe_injective (λ _ _, zero_le _) (λ _, le_rfl)
ennreal.summable ennreal.summable
... ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) : ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ i, of_function_le _)
end
lemma comap_of_function {β} (f : β → α) (h : monotone m ∨ surjective f) :
comap f (outer_measure.of_function m m_empty) =
outer_measure.of_function (λ s, m (f '' s)) (by rwa set.image_empty) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_of_function.2 $ λ s, _) (λ s, _),
{ rw comap_apply, apply of_function_le },
{ rw [comap_apply, of_function_apply, of_function_apply],
refine infi_le_infi2 (λ t, ⟨λ k, f ⁻¹' (t k), _⟩),
refine infi_le_infi2 (λ ht, _),
rw [set.image_subset_iff, preimage_Union] at ht,
refine ⟨ht, ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ n, _⟩,
cases h,
exacts [h (image_preimage_subset _ _), (congr_arg m (h.image_preimage (t n))).le] }
end
lemma map_of_function_le {β} (f : α → β) :
map f (outer_measure.of_function m m_empty) ≤
outer_measure.of_function (λ s, m (f ⁻¹' s)) m_empty :=
le_of_function.2 $ λ s, by { rw map_apply, apply of_function_le }
lemma map_of_function {β} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) :
map f (outer_measure.of_function m m_empty) =
outer_measure.of_function (λ s, m (f ⁻¹' s)) m_empty :=
begin
refine (map_of_function_le _).antisymm (λ s, _),
simp only [of_function_apply, map_apply, le_infi_iff],
intros t ht,
refine infi_le_of_le (λ n, (range f)ᶜ ∪ f '' (t n)) (infi_le_of_le _ _),
{ rw [← union_Union, ← inter_subset, ← image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_Union],
exact image_subset _ ht },
{ refine ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ n, le_of_eq _),
simp [hf.preimage_image] }
end
lemma restrict_of_function (s : set α) (hm : monotone m) :
restrict s (outer_measure.of_function m m_empty) =
outer_measure.of_function (λ t, m (t ∩ s)) (by rwa set.empty_inter) :=
by simp only [restrict, linear_map.comp_apply, comap_of_function _ (or.inl hm),
map_of_function subtype.coe_injective, subtype.image_preimage_coe]
lemma smul_of_function {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
c • outer_measure.of_function m m_empty = outer_measure.of_function (c • m) (by simp [m_empty]) :=
begin
ext1 s,
haveI : nonempty {t : ℕ → set α // s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i} := ⟨⟨λ _, s, subset_Union (λ _, s) 0⟩⟩,
simp only [smul_apply, of_function_apply, ennreal.tsum_mul_left, pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul,
infi_subtype', ennreal.infi_mul_left (λ h, (hc h).elim)],
end
end of_function
section bounded_by
variables {α : Type*} (m : set α → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- Given any function `m` assigning measures to sets, there is a unique maximal outer measure `μ`
satisfying `μ s ≤ m s` for all `s : set α`. This is the same as `outer_measure.of_function`,
except that it doesn't require `m ∅ = 0`. -/
def bounded_by : outer_measure α :=
outer_measure.of_function (λ s, ⨆ (h : s.nonempty), m s) (by simp [empty_not_nonempty])
variables {m}
theorem bounded_by_le (s : set α) : bounded_by m s ≤ m s :=
(of_function_le _).trans supr_const_le
theorem bounded_by_eq_of_function (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) (s : set α) :
bounded_by m s = outer_measure.of_function m m_empty s :=
begin
have : (λ s : set α, ⨆ (h : s.nonempty), m s) = m,
{ ext1 t, cases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h; simp [h, empty_not_nonempty, m_empty] },
simp [bounded_by, this]
end
theorem bounded_by_apply (s : set α) :
bounded_by m s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → set α) (h : s ⊆ Union t), ∑' n, ⨆ (h : (t n).nonempty), m (t n) :=
by simp [bounded_by, of_function_apply]
theorem bounded_by_eq (s : set α) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) (m_mono : ∀ ⦃t : set α⦄, s ⊆ t → m s ≤ m t)
(m_subadd : ∀ (s : ℕ → set α), m (⋃i, s i) ≤ ∑'i, m (s i)) : bounded_by m s = m s :=
by rw [bounded_by_eq_of_function m_empty, of_function_eq s m_mono m_subadd]
@[simp] theorem bounded_by_eq_self (m : outer_measure α) : bounded_by m = m :=
ext $ λ s, bounded_by_eq _ m.empty' (λ t ht, m.mono' ht) m.Union
theorem le_bounded_by {μ : outer_measure α} : μ ≤ bounded_by m ↔ ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s :=
begin
rw [bounded_by, le_of_function, forall_congr], intro s,
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h; simp [h, empty_not_nonempty]
end
theorem le_bounded_by' {μ : outer_measure α} :
μ ≤ bounded_by m ↔ ∀ s : set α, s.nonempty → μ s ≤ m s :=
by { rw [le_bounded_by, forall_congr], intro s, cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h; simp [h] }
lemma smul_bounded_by {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : c • bounded_by m = bounded_by (c • m) :=
begin
simp only [bounded_by, smul_of_function hc],
congr' 1 with s : 1,
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|hs; simp *
end
lemma comap_bounded_by {β} (f : β → α)
(h : monotone (λ s : {s : set α // s.nonempty}, m s) ∨ surjective f) :
comap f (bounded_by m) = bounded_by (λ s, m (f '' s)) :=
begin
refine (comap_of_function _ _).trans _,
{ refine h.imp (λ H s t hst, supr_le $ λ hs, _) id,
have ht : t.nonempty := hs.mono hst,
exact (@H ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨t, ht⟩ hst).trans (le_supr (λ h : t.nonempty, m t) ht) },
{ dunfold bounded_by,
congr' with s : 1,
rw nonempty_image_iff }
end
/-- If `m u = ∞` for any set `u` that has nonempty intersection both with `s` and `t`, then
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`, where `μ = measure_theory.outer_measure.bounded_by m`.
E.g., if `α` is an (e)metric space and `m u = ∞` on any set of diameter `≥ r`, then this lemma
implies that `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` on any two sets such that `r ≤ edist x y` for all `x ∈ s`
and `y ∈ t`. -/
lemma bounded_by_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter {s t : set α}
(h : ∀ u, (s ∩ u).nonempty → (t ∩ u).nonempty → m u = ∞) :
bounded_by m (s ∪ t) = bounded_by m s + bounded_by m t :=
of_function_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter $ λ u hs ht,
top_unique $ (h u hs ht).ge.trans $ le_supr (λ h, m u) (hs.mono $ inter_subset_right s u)
end bounded_by
section caratheodory_measurable
universe u
parameters {α : Type u} (m : outer_measure α)
include m
local attribute [simp] set.inter_comm set.inter_left_comm set.inter_assoc
variables {s s₁ s₂ : set α}
/-- A set `s` is Carathéodory-measurable for an outer measure `m` if for all sets `t` we have
`m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)`. -/
def is_caratheodory (s : set α) : Prop := ∀t, m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)
lemma is_caratheodory_iff_le' {s : set α} : is_caratheodory s ↔ ∀t, m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s) ≤ m t :=
forall_congr $ λ t, le_antisymm_iff.trans $ and_iff_right $ le_inter_add_diff _
@[simp] lemma is_caratheodory_empty : is_caratheodory ∅ :=
by simp [is_caratheodory, m.empty, diff_empty]
lemma is_caratheodory_compl : is_caratheodory s₁ → is_caratheodory s₁ᶜ :=
by simp [is_caratheodory, diff_eq, add_comm]
@[simp] lemma is_caratheodory_compl_iff : is_caratheodory sᶜ ↔ is_caratheodory s :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using is_caratheodory_compl m h, is_caratheodory_compl⟩
lemma is_caratheodory_union (h₁ : is_caratheodory s₁) (h₂ : is_caratheodory s₂) :
is_caratheodory (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
λ t, begin
rw [h₁ t, h₂ (t ∩ s₁), h₂ (t \ s₁), h₁ (t ∩ (s₁ ∪ s₂)),
inter_diff_assoc _ _ s₁, set.inter_assoc _ _ s₁,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right (set.subset_union_left _ _),
union_diff_left, h₂ (t ∩ s₁)],
simp [diff_eq, add_assoc]
end
lemma measure_inter_union (h : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ ∅) (h₁ : is_caratheodory s₁) {t : set α} :
m (t ∩ (s₁ ∪ s₂)) = m (t ∩ s₁) + m (t ∩ s₂) :=
by rw [h₁, set.inter_assoc, set.union_inter_cancel_left,
inter_diff_assoc, union_diff_cancel_left h]
lemma is_caratheodory_Union_lt {s : ℕ → set α} :
∀{n:ℕ}, (∀i<n, is_caratheodory (s i)) → is_caratheodory (⋃i<n, s i)
| 0 h := by simp [nat.not_lt_zero]
| (n + 1) h := by rw bUnion_lt_succ; exact is_caratheodory_union m
(is_caratheodory_Union_lt $ assume i hi, h i $ lt_of_lt_of_le hi $ nat.le_succ _)
(h n (le_refl (n + 1)))
lemma is_caratheodory_inter (h₁ : is_caratheodory s₁) (h₂ : is_caratheodory s₂) :
is_caratheodory (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by { rw [← is_caratheodory_compl_iff, compl_inter],
exact is_caratheodory_union _ (is_caratheodory_compl _ h₁) (is_caratheodory_compl _ h₂) }
lemma is_caratheodory_sum {s : ℕ → set α} (h : ∀i, is_caratheodory (s i))
(hd : pairwise (disjoint on s)) {t : set α} :
∀ {n}, ∑ i in finset.range n, m (t ∩ s i) = m (t ∩ ⋃i<n, s i)
| 0 := by simp [nat.not_lt_zero, m.empty]
| (nat.succ n) := begin
rw [bUnion_lt_succ, finset.sum_range_succ, set.union_comm, is_caratheodory_sum,
m.measure_inter_union _ (h n), add_comm],
intro a,
simpa using λ (h₁ : a ∈ s n) i (hi : i < n) h₂, hd _ _ (ne_of_gt hi) ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
end
lemma is_caratheodory_Union_nat {s : ℕ → set α} (h : ∀i, is_caratheodory (s i))
(hd : pairwise (disjoint on s)) : is_caratheodory (⋃i, s i) :=
is_caratheodory_iff_le'.2 $ λ t, begin
have hp : m (t ∩ ⋃i, s i) ≤ (⨆n, m (t ∩ ⋃i<n, s i)),
{ convert m.Union (λ i, t ∩ s i),
{ rw inter_Union },
{ simp [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat, is_caratheodory_sum m h hd] } },
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right hp _) _,
rw ennreal.supr_add,
refine supr_le (λ n, le_trans (add_le_add_left _ _)
(ge_of_eq (is_caratheodory_Union_lt m (λ i _, h i) _))),
refine m.mono (diff_subset_diff_right _),
exact bUnion_subset (λ i _, subset_Union _ i),
end
lemma f_Union {s : ℕ → set α} (h : ∀i, is_caratheodory (s i))
(hd : pairwise (disjoint on s)) : m (⋃i, s i) = ∑'i, m (s i) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (m.Union_nat s) _,
rw ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat,
refine supr_le (λ n, _),
have := @is_caratheodory_sum _ m _ h hd univ n,
simp at this, simp [this],
exact m.mono (bUnion_subset (λ i _, subset_Union _ i)),
end
/-- The Carathéodory-measurable sets for an outer measure `m` form a Dynkin system. -/
def caratheodory_dynkin : measurable_space.dynkin_system α :=
{ has := is_caratheodory,
has_empty := is_caratheodory_empty,
has_compl := assume s, is_caratheodory_compl,
has_Union_nat := assume f hf hn, is_caratheodory_Union_nat hn hf }
/-- Given an outer measure `μ`, the Carathéodory-measurable space is
defined such that `s` is measurable if `∀t, μ t = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s)`. -/
protected def caratheodory : measurable_space α :=
caratheodory_dynkin.to_measurable_space $ assume s₁ s₂, is_caratheodory_inter
lemma is_caratheodory_iff {s : set α} :
caratheodory.measurable_set' s ↔ ∀t, m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s) :=
iff.rfl
lemma is_caratheodory_iff_le {s : set α} :
caratheodory.measurable_set' s ↔ ∀t, m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s) ≤ m t :=
is_caratheodory_iff_le'
protected lemma Union_eq_of_caratheodory {s : ℕ → set α}
(h : ∀i, caratheodory.measurable_set' (s i)) (hd : pairwise (disjoint on s)) :
m (⋃i, s i) = ∑'i, m (s i) :=
f_Union h hd
end caratheodory_measurable
variables {α : Type*}
lemma of_function_caratheodory {m : set α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : set α}
{h₀ : m ∅ = 0} (hs : ∀t, m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s) ≤ m t) :
(outer_measure.of_function m h₀).caratheodory.measurable_set' s :=
begin
apply (is_caratheodory_iff_le _).mpr,
refine λ t, le_infi (λ f, le_infi $ λ hf, _),
refine le_trans (add_le_add
(infi_le_of_le (λi, f i ∩ s) $ infi_le _ _)
(infi_le_of_le (λi, f i \ s) $ infi_le _ _)) _,
{ rw ← Union_inter, exact inter_subset_inter_left _ hf },
{ rw ← Union_diff, exact diff_subset_diff_left hf },
{ rw ← ennreal.tsum_add, exact ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ i, hs _) }
end
lemma bounded_by_caratheodory {m : set α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : set α}
(hs : ∀t, m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s) ≤ m t) : (bounded_by m).caratheodory.measurable_set' s :=
begin
apply of_function_caratheodory, intro t,
cases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h, empty_not_nonempty] },
{ convert le_trans _ (hs t), { simp [h] }, exact add_le_add supr_const_le supr_const_le }
end
@[simp] theorem zero_caratheodory : (0 : outer_measure α).caratheodory = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ λ s _ t, (add_zero _).symm
theorem top_caratheodory : (⊤ : outer_measure α).caratheodory = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ assume s hs, (is_caratheodory_iff_le _).2 $ assume t,
t.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ ht, by simp [ht])
(λ ht, by simp only [ht, top_apply, le_top])
theorem le_add_caratheodory (m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α) :
m₁.caratheodory ⊓ m₂.caratheodory ≤ (m₁ + m₂ : outer_measure α).caratheodory :=
λ s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t, by simp [hs₁ t, hs₂ t, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem le_sum_caratheodory {ι} (m : ι → outer_measure α) :
(⨅ i, (m i).caratheodory) ≤ (sum m).caratheodory :=
λ s h t, by simp [λ i,
measurable_space.measurable_set_infi.1 h i t, ennreal.tsum_add]
theorem le_smul_caratheodory (a : ℝ≥0∞) (m : outer_measure α) :
m.caratheodory ≤ (a • m).caratheodory :=
λ s h t, by simp [h t, mul_add]
@[simp] theorem dirac_caratheodory (a : α) : (dirac a).caratheodory = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ λ s _ t, begin
by_cases ht : a ∈ t, swap, by simp [ht],
by_cases hs : a ∈ s; simp*
end
section Inf_gen
/-- Given a set of outer measures, we define a new function that on a set `s` is defined to be the
infimum of `μ(s)` for the outer measures `μ` in the collection. We ensure that this
function is defined to be `0` on `∅`, even if the collection of outer measures is empty.
The outer measure generated by this function is the infimum of the given outer measures. -/
def Inf_gen (m : set (outer_measure α)) (s : set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (μ : outer_measure α) (h : μ ∈ m), μ s
lemma Inf_gen_def (m : set (outer_measure α)) (t : set α) :
Inf_gen m t = (⨅ (μ : outer_measure α) (h : μ ∈ m), μ t) :=
rfl
lemma Inf_eq_bounded_by_Inf_gen (m : set (outer_measure α)) :
Inf m = outer_measure.bounded_by (Inf_gen m) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ refine (le_bounded_by.2 $ λ s, _), refine le_binfi _,
intros μ hμ, refine (show Inf m ≤ μ, from Inf_le hμ) s },
{ refine le_Inf _, intros μ hμ t, refine le_trans (bounded_by_le t) (binfi_le μ hμ) }
end
lemma supr_Inf_gen_nonempty {m : set (outer_measure α)} (h : m.nonempty) (t : set α) :
(⨆ (h : t.nonempty), Inf_gen m t) = (⨅ (μ : outer_measure α) (h : μ ∈ m), μ t) :=
begin
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|ht,
{ rcases h with ⟨μ, hμ⟩,
rw [eq_false_intro empty_not_nonempty, supr_false, eq_comm],
simp_rw [empty'],
apply bot_unique,
refine infi_le_of_le μ (infi_le _ hμ) },
{ simp [ht, Inf_gen_def] }
end
/-- The value of the Infimum of a nonempty set of outer measures on a set is not simply
the minimum value of a measure on that set: it is the infimum sum of measures of countable set of
sets that covers that set, where a different measure can be used for each set in the cover. -/
lemma Inf_apply {m : set (outer_measure α)} {s : set α} (h : m.nonempty) :
Inf m s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → set α) (h2 : s ⊆ Union t),
∑' n, ⨅ (μ : outer_measure α) (h3 : μ ∈ m), μ (t n) :=
by simp_rw [Inf_eq_bounded_by_Inf_gen, bounded_by_apply, supr_Inf_gen_nonempty h]
/-- The value of the Infimum of a set of outer measures on a nonempty set is not simply
the minimum value of a measure on that set: it is the infimum sum of measures of countable set of
sets that covers that set, where a different measure can be used for each set in the cover. -/
lemma Inf_apply' {m : set (outer_measure α)} {s : set α} (h : s.nonempty) :
Inf m s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → set α) (h2 : s ⊆ Union t),
∑' n, ⨅ (μ : outer_measure α) (h3 : μ ∈ m), μ (t n) :=
m.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ hm, by simp [hm, h]) Inf_apply
/-- The value of the Infimum of a nonempty family of outer measures on a set is not simply
the minimum value of a measure on that set: it is the infimum sum of measures of countable set of
sets that covers that set, where a different measure can be used for each set in the cover. -/
lemma infi_apply {ι} [nonempty ι] (m : ι → outer_measure α) (s : set α) :
(⨅ i, m i) s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → set α) (h2 : s ⊆ Union t), ∑' n, ⨅ i, m i (t n) :=
by { rw [infi, Inf_apply (range_nonempty m)], simp only [infi_range] }
/-- The value of the Infimum of a family of outer measures on a nonempty set is not simply
the minimum value of a measure on that set: it is the infimum sum of measures of countable set of
sets that covers that set, where a different measure can be used for each set in the cover. -/
lemma infi_apply' {ι} (m : ι → outer_measure α) {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) :
(⨅ i, m i) s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → set α) (h2 : s ⊆ Union t), ∑' n, ⨅ i, m i (t n) :=
by { rw [infi, Inf_apply' hs], simp only [infi_range] }
/-- The value of the Infimum of a nonempty family of outer measures on a set is not simply
the minimum value of a measure on that set: it is the infimum sum of measures of countable set of
sets that covers that set, where a different measure can be used for each set in the cover. -/
lemma binfi_apply {ι} {I : set ι} (hI : I.nonempty) (m : ι → outer_measure α) (s : set α) :
(⨅ i ∈ I, m i) s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → set α) (h2 : s ⊆ Union t), ∑' n, ⨅ i ∈ I, m i (t n) :=
by { haveI := hI.to_subtype, simp only [← infi_subtype'', infi_apply] }
/-- The value of the Infimum of a nonempty family of outer measures on a set is not simply
the minimum value of a measure on that set: it is the infimum sum of measures of countable set of
sets that covers that set, where a different measure can be used for each set in the cover. -/
lemma binfi_apply' {ι} (I : set ι) (m : ι → outer_measure α) {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) :
(⨅ i ∈ I, m i) s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → set α) (h2 : s ⊆ Union t), ∑' n, ⨅ i ∈ I, m i (t n) :=
by { simp only [← infi_subtype'', infi_apply' _ hs] }
lemma map_infi_le {ι β} (f : α → β) (m : ι → outer_measure α) :
map f (⨅ i, m i) ≤ ⨅ i, map f (m i) :=
(map_mono f).map_infi_le
lemma comap_infi {ι β} (f : α → β) (m : ι → outer_measure β) :
comap f (⨅ i, m i) = ⨅ i, comap f (m i) :=
begin
refine ext_nonempty (λ s hs, _),
refine ((comap_mono f).map_infi_le s).antisymm _,
simp only [comap_apply, infi_apply' _ hs, infi_apply' _ (hs.image _),
le_infi_iff, set.image_subset_iff, preimage_Union],
refine λ t ht, infi_le_of_le _ (infi_le_of_le ht $ ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ k, _),
exact infi_le_infi (λ i, (m i).mono (image_preimage_subset _ _))
end
lemma map_infi {ι β} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) (m : ι → outer_measure α) :
map f (⨅ i, m i) = restrict (range f) (⨅ i, map f (m i)) :=
begin
refine eq.trans _ (map_comap _ _),
simp only [comap_infi, comap_map hf]
end
lemma map_infi_comap {ι β} [nonempty ι] {f : α → β} (m : ι → outer_measure β) :
map f (⨅ i, comap f (m i)) = ⨅ i, map f (comap f (m i)) :=
begin
refine (map_infi_le _ _).antisymm (λ s, _),
simp only [map_apply, comap_apply, infi_apply, le_infi_iff],
refine λ t ht, infi_le_of_le (λ n, f '' (t n) ∪ (range f)ᶜ) (infi_le_of_le _ _),
{ rw [← Union_union, set.union_comm, ← inter_subset, ← image_Union,
← image_preimage_eq_inter_range],
exact image_subset _ ht },
{ refine ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ n, infi_le_infi (λ i, (m i).mono _)),
simp }
end
lemma map_binfi_comap {ι β} {I : set ι} (hI : I.nonempty) {f : α → β} (m : ι → outer_measure β) :
map f (⨅ i ∈ I, comap f (m i)) = ⨅ i ∈ I, map f (comap f (m i)) :=
by { haveI := hI.to_subtype, rw [← infi_subtype'', ← infi_subtype''], exact map_infi_comap _ }
lemma restrict_infi_restrict {ι} (s : set α) (m : ι → outer_measure α) :
restrict s (⨅ i, restrict s (m i)) = restrict s (⨅ i, m i) :=
calc restrict s (⨅ i, restrict s (m i)) = restrict (range (coe : s → α)) (⨅ i, restrict s (m i)) :
by rw [subtype.range_coe]
... = map (coe : s → α) (⨅ i, comap coe (m i)) : (map_infi subtype.coe_injective _).symm
... = restrict s (⨅ i, m i) : congr_arg (map coe) (comap_infi _ _).symm
lemma restrict_infi {ι} [nonempty ι] (s : set α) (m : ι → outer_measure α) :
restrict s (⨅ i, m i) = ⨅ i, restrict s (m i) :=
(congr_arg (map coe) (comap_infi _ _)).trans (map_infi_comap _)
lemma restrict_binfi {ι} {I : set ι} (hI : I.nonempty) (s : set α) (m : ι → outer_measure α) :
restrict s (⨅ i ∈ I, m i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, restrict s (m i) :=
by { haveI := hI.to_subtype, rw [← infi_subtype'', ← infi_subtype''], exact restrict_infi _ _ }
/-- This proves that Inf and restrict commute for outer measures, so long as the set of
outer measures is nonempty. -/
lemma restrict_Inf_eq_Inf_restrict
(m : set (outer_measure α)) {s : set α} (hm : m.nonempty) :
restrict s (Inf m) = Inf ((restrict s) '' m) :=
by simp only [Inf_eq_infi, restrict_binfi, hm, infi_image]
end Inf_gen
end outer_measure
open outer_measure
/-! ### Induced Outer Measure
We can extend a function defined on a subset of `set α` to an outer measure.
The underlying function is called `extend`, and the measure it induces is called
`induced_outer_measure`.
Some lemmas below are proven twice, once in the general case, and one where the function `m`
is only defined on measurable sets (i.e. when `P = measurable_set`). In the latter cases, we can
remove some hypotheses in the statement. The general version has the same name, but with a prime
at the end. -/
section extend
variables {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop}
variables (m : Π (s : α), P s → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- We can trivially extend a function defined on a subclass of objects (with codomain `ℝ≥0∞`)
to all objects by defining it to be `∞` on the objects not in the class. -/
def extend (s : α) : ℝ≥0∞ := ⨅ h : P s, m s h
lemma extend_eq {s : α} (h : P s) : extend m s = m s h :=
by simp [extend, h]
lemma extend_eq_top {s : α} (h : ¬P s) : extend m s = ∞ :=
by simp [extend, h]
lemma le_extend {s : α} (h : P s) : m s h ≤ extend m s :=
by { simp only [extend, le_infi_iff], intro, refl' }
-- TODO: why this is a bad `congr` lemma?
lemma extend_congr {β : Type*} {Pb : β → Prop} {mb : Π s : β, Pb s → ℝ≥0∞}
{sa : α} {sb : β} (hP : P sa ↔ Pb sb) (hm : ∀ (ha : P sa) (hb : Pb sb), m sa ha = mb sb hb) :
extend m sa = extend mb sb :=
infi_congr_Prop hP (λ h, hm _ _)
end extend
section extend_set
variables {α : Type*} {P : set α → Prop}
variables {m : Π (s : set α), P s → ℝ≥0∞}
variables (P0 : P ∅) (m0 : m ∅ P0 = 0)
variables (PU : ∀{{f : ℕ → set α}} (hm : ∀i, P (f i)), P (⋃i, f i))
variables (mU : ∀ {{f : ℕ → set α}} (hm : ∀i, P (f i)), pairwise (disjoint on f) →
m (⋃i, f i) (PU hm) = ∑'i, m (f i) (hm i))
variables (msU : ∀ {{f : ℕ → set α}} (hm : ∀i, P (f i)),
m (⋃i, f i) (PU hm) ≤ ∑'i, m (f i) (hm i))
variables (m_mono : ∀⦃s₁ s₂ : set α⦄ (hs₁ : P s₁) (hs₂ : P s₂), s₁ ⊆ s₂ → m s₁ hs₁ ≤ m s₂ hs₂)
lemma extend_empty : extend m ∅ = 0 :=
(extend_eq _ P0).trans m0
lemma extend_Union_nat
{f : ℕ → set α} (hm : ∀i, P (f i))
(mU : m (⋃i, f i) (PU hm) = ∑'i, m (f i) (hm i)) :
extend m (⋃i, f i) = ∑'i, extend m (f i) :=
(extend_eq _ _).trans $ mU.trans $ by { congr' with i, rw extend_eq }
section subadditive
include PU msU
lemma extend_Union_le_tsum_nat'
(s : ℕ → set α) : extend m (⋃i, s i) ≤ ∑'i, extend m (s i) :=
begin
by_cases h : ∀i, P (s i),
{ rw [extend_eq _ (PU h), congr_arg tsum _],
{ apply msU h },
funext i, apply extend_eq _ (h i) },
{ cases not_forall.1 h with i hi,
exact le_trans (le_infi $ λ h, hi.elim h) (ennreal.le_tsum i) }
end
end subadditive
section mono
include m_mono
lemma extend_mono'
⦃s₁ s₂ : set α⦄ (h₁ : P s₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : extend m s₁ ≤ extend m s₂ :=
by { refine le_infi _, intro h₂, rw [extend_eq m h₁], exact m_mono h₁ h₂ hs }
end mono
section unions
include P0 m0 PU mU
lemma extend_Union {β} [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hd : pairwise (disjoint on f)) (hm : ∀i, P (f i)) :
extend m (⋃i, f i) = ∑'i, extend m (f i) :=
begin
rw [← encodable.Union_decode₂, ← tsum_Union_decode₂],
{ exact extend_Union_nat PU
(λ n, encodable.Union_decode₂_cases P0 hm)
(mU _ (encodable.Union_decode₂_disjoint_on hd)) },
{ exact extend_empty P0 m0 }
end
lemma extend_union {s₁ s₂ : set α} (hd : disjoint s₁ s₂) (h₁ : P s₁) (h₂ : P s₂) :
extend m (s₁ ∪ s₂) = extend m s₁ + extend m s₂ :=
begin
rw [union_eq_Union, extend_Union P0 m0 PU mU
(pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 hd) (bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩), tsum_fintype],
simp
end
end unions
variable (m)
/-- Given an arbitrary function on a subset of sets, we can define the outer measure corresponding
to it (this is the unique maximal outer measure that is at most `m` on the domain of `m`). -/
def induced_outer_measure : outer_measure α :=
outer_measure.of_function (extend m) (extend_empty P0 m0)
variables {m P0 m0}
lemma le_induced_outer_measure {μ : outer_measure α} :
μ ≤ induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 ↔ ∀ s (hs : P s), μ s ≤ m s hs :=
le_of_function.trans $ forall_congr $ λ s, le_infi_iff
/-- If `P u` is `false` for any set `u` that has nonempty intersection both with `s` and `t`, then
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`, where `μ = induced_outer_measure m P0 m0`.
E.g., if `α` is an (e)metric space and `P u = diam u < r`, then this lemma implies that
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` on any two sets such that `r ≤ edist x y` for all `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`. -/
lemma induced_outer_measure_union_of_false_of_nonempty_inter {s t : set α}
(h : ∀ u, (s ∩ u).nonempty → (t ∩ u).nonempty → ¬P u) :
induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 (s ∪ t) =
induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 s + induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 t :=
of_function_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter $ λ u hsu htu, @infi_of_empty _ _ _ ⟨h u hsu htu⟩ _
include msU m_mono
lemma induced_outer_measure_eq_extend' {s : set α} (hs : P s) :
induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 s = extend m s :=
of_function_eq s (λ t, extend_mono' m_mono hs) (extend_Union_le_tsum_nat' PU msU)
lemma induced_outer_measure_eq' {s : set α} (hs : P s) :
induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 s = m s hs :=
(induced_outer_measure_eq_extend' PU msU m_mono hs).trans $ extend_eq _ _
lemma induced_outer_measure_eq_infi (s : set α) :
induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 s = ⨅ (t : set α) (ht : P t) (h : s ⊆ t), m t ht :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ simp only [le_infi_iff], intros t ht, simp only [le_infi_iff], intro hs,
refine le_trans (mono' _ hs) _,
exact le_of_eq (induced_outer_measure_eq' _ msU m_mono _) },
{ refine le_infi _, intro f, refine le_infi _, intro hf,
refine le_trans _ (extend_Union_le_tsum_nat' _ msU _),
refine le_infi _, intro h2f,
refine infi_le_of_le _ (infi_le_of_le h2f $ infi_le _ hf) }
end
lemma induced_outer_measure_preimage (f : α ≃ α) (Pm : ∀ (s : set α), P (f ⁻¹' s) ↔ P s)
(mm : ∀ (s : set α) (hs : P s), m (f ⁻¹' s) ((Pm _).mpr hs) = m s hs)
{A : set α} : induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 (f ⁻¹' A) = induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 A :=
begin
simp only [induced_outer_measure_eq_infi _ msU m_mono], symmetry,
refine infi_congr (preimage f) f.injective.preimage_surjective _, intro s,
refine infi_congr_Prop (Pm s) _, intro hs,
refine infi_congr_Prop f.surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff _,
intro h2s, exact mm s hs
end
lemma induced_outer_measure_exists_set {s : set α}
(hs : induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ (t : set α) (ht : P t), s ⊆ t ∧
induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 t ≤ induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 s + ε :=
begin
have := ennreal.lt_add_right hs hε,
conv at this {to_lhs, rw induced_outer_measure_eq_infi _ msU m_mono },
simp only [infi_lt_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨t, h1t, h2t, h3t⟩,
exact ⟨t, h1t, h2t,
le_trans (le_of_eq $ induced_outer_measure_eq' _ msU m_mono h1t) (le_of_lt h3t)⟩
end
/-- To test whether `s` is Carathéodory-measurable we only need to check the sets `t` for which
`P t` holds. See `of_function_caratheodory` for another way to show the Carathéodory-measurability
of `s`.
-/
lemma induced_outer_measure_caratheodory (s : set α) :
(induced_outer_measure m P0 m0).caratheodory.measurable_set' s ↔ ∀ (t : set α), P t →
induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 (t ∩ s) + induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 (t \ s) ≤
induced_outer_measure m P0 m0 t :=
begin
rw is_caratheodory_iff_le,
split,
{ intros h t ht, exact h t },
{ intros h u, conv_rhs { rw induced_outer_measure_eq_infi _ msU m_mono },
refine le_infi _, intro t, refine le_infi _, intro ht, refine le_infi _, intro h2t,
refine le_trans _ (le_trans (h t ht) $ le_of_eq $ induced_outer_measure_eq' _ msU m_mono ht),
refine add_le_add (mono' _ $ set.inter_subset_inter_left _ h2t)
(mono' _ $ diff_subset_diff_left h2t) }
end
end extend_set
/-! If `P` is `measurable_set` for some measurable space, then we can remove some hypotheses of the
above lemmas. -/
section measurable_space
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α]
variables {m : Π (s : set α), measurable_set s → ℝ≥0∞}
variables (m0 : m ∅ measurable_set.empty = 0)
variable (mU : ∀ {{f : ℕ → set α}} (hm : ∀i, measurable_set (f i)), pairwise (disjoint on f) →
m (⋃i, f i) (measurable_set.Union hm) = ∑'i, m (f i) (hm i))
include m0 mU
lemma extend_mono {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h₁ : measurable_set s₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
extend m s₁ ≤ extend m s₂ :=
begin
refine le_infi _, intro h₂,
have := extend_union measurable_set.empty m0 measurable_set.Union mU disjoint_diff
h₁ (h₂.diff h₁),
rw union_diff_cancel hs at this,
rw ← extend_eq m,
exact le_iff_exists_add.2 ⟨_, this⟩,
end
lemma extend_Union_le_tsum_nat : ∀ (s : ℕ → set α), extend m (⋃i, s i) ≤ ∑'i, extend m (s i) :=
begin
refine extend_Union_le_tsum_nat' measurable_set.Union _, intros f h,
simp [Union_disjointed.symm] {single_pass := tt},
rw [mU (measurable_set.disjointed h) (disjoint_disjointed _)],
refine ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ i, _),
rw [← extend_eq m, ← extend_eq m],
exact extend_mono m0 mU (measurable_set.disjointed h _) (disjointed_le f _),
end
lemma induced_outer_measure_eq_extend {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
induced_outer_measure m measurable_set.empty m0 s = extend m s :=
of_function_eq s (λ t, extend_mono m0 mU hs) (extend_Union_le_tsum_nat m0 mU)
lemma induced_outer_measure_eq {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
induced_outer_measure m measurable_set.empty m0 s = m s hs :=
(induced_outer_measure_eq_extend m0 mU hs).trans $ extend_eq _ _
end measurable_space
namespace outer_measure
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] (m : outer_measure α)
/-- Given an outer measure `m` we can forget its value on non-measurable sets, and then consider
`m.trim`, the unique maximal outer measure less than that function. -/
def trim : outer_measure α :=
induced_outer_measure (λ s _, m s) measurable_set.empty m.empty
theorem le_trim : m ≤ m.trim :=
le_of_function.mpr $ λ s, le_infi $ λ _, le_refl _
theorem trim_eq {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) : m.trim s = m s :=
induced_outer_measure_eq' measurable_set.Union (λ f hf, m.Union_nat f) (λ _ _ _ _ h, m.mono h) hs
theorem trim_congr {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α}
(H : ∀ {s : set α}, measurable_set s → m₁ s = m₂ s) :
m₁.trim = m₂.trim :=
by { unfold trim, congr, funext s hs, exact H hs }
@[mono] theorem trim_mono : monotone (trim : outer_measure α → outer_measure α) :=
λ m₁ m₂ H s, binfi_le_binfi $ λ f hs, ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ b, infi_le_infi $ λ hf, H _
theorem le_trim_iff {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α} :
m₁ ≤ m₂.trim ↔ ∀ s, measurable_set s → m₁ s ≤ m₂ s :=
le_of_function.trans $ forall_congr $ λ s, le_infi_iff
theorem trim_le_trim_iff {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α} :
m₁.trim ≤ m₂.trim ↔ ∀ s, measurable_set s → m₁ s ≤ m₂ s :=
le_trim_iff.trans $ forall_congr $ λ s, forall_congr $ λ hs, by rw [trim_eq _ hs]
theorem trim_eq_trim_iff {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α} :
m₁.trim = m₂.trim ↔ ∀ s, measurable_set s → m₁ s = m₂ s :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, trim_le_trim_iff, forall_and_distrib]
theorem trim_eq_infi (s : set α) : m.trim s = ⨅ t (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : measurable_set t), m t :=
by { simp only [infi_comm] {single_pass := tt}, exact induced_outer_measure_eq_infi
measurable_set.Union (λ f _, m.Union_nat f) (λ _ _ _ _ h, m.mono h) s }
theorem trim_eq_infi' (s : set α) : m.trim s = ⨅ t : {t // s ⊆ t ∧ measurable_set t}, m t :=
by simp [infi_subtype, infi_and, trim_eq_infi]
theorem trim_trim (m : outer_measure α) : m.trim.trim = m.trim :=
trim_eq_trim_iff.2 $ λ s, m.trim_eq
@[simp] theorem trim_zero : (0 : outer_measure α).trim = 0 :=
ext $ λ s, le_antisymm
(le_trans ((trim 0).mono (subset_univ s)) $
le_of_eq $ trim_eq _ measurable_set.univ)
(zero_le _)
theorem trim_sum_ge {ι} (m : ι → outer_measure α) : sum (λ i, (m i).trim) ≤ (sum m).trim :=
λ s, by simp [trim_eq_infi]; exact
λ t st ht, ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ i,
infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le_of_le st $ infi_le _ ht)
lemma exists_measurable_superset_eq_trim (m : outer_measure α) (s : set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ measurable_set t ∧ m t = m.trim s :=
begin
simp only [trim_eq_infi], set ms := ⨅ (t : set α) (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : measurable_set t), m t,
by_cases hs : ms = ∞,
{ simp only [hs],
simp only [infi_eq_top] at hs,
exact ⟨univ, subset_univ s, measurable_set.univ, hs _ (subset_univ s) measurable_set.univ⟩ },
{ have : ∀ r > ms, ∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ measurable_set t ∧ m t < r,
{ intros r hs,
simpa [infi_lt_iff] using hs },
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ measurable_set t ∧ m t < ms + n⁻¹,
{ assume n,
refine this _ (ennreal.lt_add_right hs _),
simp },
choose t hsub hm hm',
refine ⟨⋂ n, t n, subset_Inter hsub, measurable_set.Inter hm, _⟩,
have : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, ms + n⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 (ms + 0)),
from tendsto_const_nhds.add ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero,
rw add_zero at this,
refine le_antisymm (ge_of_tendsto' this $ λ n, _) _,
{ exact le_trans (m.mono' $ Inter_subset t n) (hm' n).le },
{ refine infi_le_of_le (⋂ n, t n) _,
refine infi_le_of_le (subset_Inter hsub) _,
refine infi_le _ (measurable_set.Inter hm) } }
end
lemma exists_measurable_superset_of_trim_eq_zero
{m : outer_measure α} {s : set α} (h : m.trim s = 0) :
∃t, s ⊆ t ∧ measurable_set t ∧ m t = 0 :=
begin
rcases exists_measurable_superset_eq_trim m s with ⟨t, hst, ht, hm⟩,
exact ⟨t, hst, ht, h ▸ hm⟩
end
/-- If `μ i` is a countable family of outer measures, then for every set `s` there exists
a measurable set `t ⊇ s` such that `μ i t = (μ i).trim s` for all `i`. -/
lemma exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq_trim {ι} [encodable ι] (μ : ι → outer_measure α)
(s : set α) : ∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ measurable_set t ∧ ∀ i, μ i t = (μ i).trim s :=
begin
choose t hst ht hμt using λ i, (μ i).exists_measurable_superset_eq_trim s,
replace hst := subset_Inter hst,
replace ht := measurable_set.Inter ht,
refine ⟨⋂ i, t i, hst, ht, λ i, le_antisymm _ _⟩,
exacts [hμt i ▸ (μ i).mono (Inter_subset _ _),
(mono' _ hst).trans_eq ((μ i).trim_eq ht)]
end
/-- If `m₁ s = op (m₂ s) (m₃ s)` for all `s`, then the same is true for `m₁.trim`, `m₂.trim`,
and `m₃ s`. -/
theorem trim_binop {m₁ m₂ m₃ : outer_measure α} {op : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ s, m₁ s = op (m₂ s) (m₃ s)) (s : set α) :
m₁.trim s = op (m₂.trim s) (m₃.trim s) :=
begin
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq_trim (![m₁, m₂, m₃]) s
with ⟨t, hst, ht, htm⟩,
simp only [fin.forall_fin_succ, matrix.cons_val_zero, matrix.cons_val_succ] at htm,
rw [← htm.1, ← htm.2.1, ← htm.2.2.1, h]
end
/-- If `m₁ s = op (m₂ s)` for all `s`, then the same is true for `m₁.trim` and `m₂.trim`. -/
theorem trim_op {m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α} {op : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ s, m₁ s = op (m₂ s)) (s : set α) :
m₁.trim s = op (m₂.trim s) :=
@trim_binop α _ m₁ m₂ 0 (λ a b, op a) h s
/-- `trim` is additive. -/
theorem trim_add (m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α) : (m₁ + m₂).trim = m₁.trim + m₂.trim :=
ext $ trim_binop (add_apply m₁ m₂)
/-- `trim` respects scalar multiplication. -/
theorem trim_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) (m : outer_measure α) :
(c • m).trim = c • m.trim :=
ext $ trim_op (smul_apply c m)
/-- `trim` sends the supremum of two outer measures to the supremum of the trimmed measures. -/
theorem trim_sup (m₁ m₂ : outer_measure α) : (m₁ ⊔ m₂).trim = m₁.trim ⊔ m₂.trim :=
ext $ λ s, (trim_binop (sup_apply m₁ m₂) s).trans (sup_apply _ _ _).symm
/-- `trim` sends the supremum of a countable family of outer measures to the supremum
of the trimmed measures. -/
lemma trim_supr {ι} [encodable ι] (μ : ι → outer_measure α) :
trim (⨆ i, μ i) = ⨆ i, trim (μ i) :=
begin
ext1 s,
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq_trim (λ o, option.elim o (supr μ) μ) s
with ⟨t, hst, ht, hμt⟩,
simp only [option.forall, option.elim] at hμt,
simp only [supr_apply, ← hμt.1, ← hμt.2]
end
/-- The trimmed property of a measure μ states that `μ.to_outer_measure.trim = μ.to_outer_measure`.
This theorem shows that a restricted trimmed outer measure is a trimmed outer measure. -/
lemma restrict_trim {μ : outer_measure α} {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
(restrict s μ).trim = restrict s μ.trim :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (λ t, _) (le_trim_iff.2 $ λ t ht, _),
{ rw restrict_apply,
rcases μ.exists_measurable_superset_eq_trim (t ∩ s) with ⟨t', htt', ht', hμt'⟩,
rw [← hμt'], rw inter_subset at htt',
refine (mono' _ htt').trans _,
rw [trim_eq _ (hs.compl.union ht'), restrict_apply, union_inter_distrib_right,
compl_inter_self, set.empty_union],
exact μ.mono' (inter_subset_left _ _) },
{ rw [restrict_apply, trim_eq _ (ht.inter hs), restrict_apply],
exact le_rfl }
end
end outer_measure
end measure_theory
|
5d2534d0cec56dd0a38646020dce7ceee8cfedf8 | 097294e9b80f0d9893ac160b9c7219aa135b51b9 | /instructor/propositional_logic/propositional_logic_test.lean | c8f414161211e5bc45d663958f5fdaf2f2af871f | [] | no_license | AbigailCastro17/CS2102-Discrete-Math | cf296251be9418ce90206f5e66bde9163e21abf9 | d741e4d2d6a9b2e0c8380e51706218b8f608cee4 | refs/heads/main | 1,682,891,087,358 | 1,621,401,341,000 | 1,621,401,341,000 | 368,749,959 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,227 | lean | import .propositional_logic_syntax_and_semantics
open pExp
-- some "variables" (of type var)
def P_var := var.mk 0
def Q_var := var.mk 1
def R_var := var.mk 2
#check P_var
-- some variable expressions (of type pExp)
def P := pVar P_var
def Q := pVar Q_var
def R := pVar R_var
-- confirming that we can build larger expresions
#check P
#check pAnd P Q -- P ∧ Q
#check pOr Q (pNot R) -- Q ∨ (¬ P)
-- confirming we can use our traditional notation!
#check P ∧ Q
#check P ∨ Q
#check ¬ P
#check P > Q
#check P ↔ Q
#check P ⊕ Q
-- all four possible interpretations for two variables
def interp_all_false : var → bool
| _ := ff
def interp_all_true : var → bool
| _ := tt
def tt_ff_interp : var → bool
| (var.mk 0) := tt -- P_var
| (var.mk 1) := ff -- Q_var
| _ := ff
def ff_tt_interp : var → bool
| (var.mk 0) := ff -- P_var
| (var.mk 1) := tt -- Q_var
| _ := ff
-- evaluating expressions written as abstract syntax trees
#eval pEval P interp_all_false
#eval pEval P interp_all_true
#eval pEval (pOr (pAnd P Q) R) -- (P ∧ Q) ∨ R
-- but now we can write them using standard notation
#eval pEval ((P ∧ Q) ∨ R) interp_all_false
#eval pEval ((P ∧ Q) ∨ R) interp_all_true
#eval pEval ((P ∧ Q) ∨ R) interp_all_false
-- An expression from last class
#eval pEval (pAnd
(pOr
P
Q
)
(pAnd
P
Q
)
)
interp_all_true
-- rewritting using standard logical notation
#check ((P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∧ Q))
-- Evaluated under all for possible interpretations
#eval pEval ((P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∧ Q)) interp_all_true
#eval pEval ((P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∧ Q)) tt_ff_interp
#eval pEval ((P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∧ Q)) ff_tt_interp
#eval pEval ((P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∧ Q)) interp_all_false
-- Yielding a truth table for this expression!
-- P Q (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∧ Q)
-- tt tt tt
-- tt ff ff
-- ff tt ff
-- ff ff ff
/-
Each row of the truth table corresponds to an
interpretation, and the value in the last column
of each row is the meaning of the given expression
under the interpretation specified by that row.
-/
/-
The best algorithms that we have today have to
compute and search the entire truth table before
determining whether an expression is satisfiable
or not. If there are N variables, the number of
interpretations (rows in the corresponding truth
table) is 2^N.
It's easy to compute the value of an expression
under any particular interpretation, but in the
worst case, it's exponentially hard to *search*
for such a satisfying solution -- at least today.
The biggest open question in computer science is
whether there exists an algorithm with better
than worst-case exponential time complexity for
deciding whether an arbitrary propositional logic
formula is satisfiable or not.
The question is usually posed by asking whether
two classes of problems, P and NP, are equal or
not. The question is thus usually phrased, does
P = NP? If you want to go down in history, solve
this problem. Many brilliant minds have tried to
no avail.
-/
|
30556e24c7e3e8d48a99f71b27d072648074fb7a | 1e561612e7479c100cd9302e3fe08cbd2914aa25 | /mathlib4_experiments/Tactic/Exacts.lean | a076fa425e70b9066318267ec7ab2e4d9a5a8cee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib4_experiments | 8de8ed7193f70748a7529e05d831203a7c64eedb | 87cb879b4d602c8ecfd9283b7c0b06015abdbab1 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,971,389,316 | 1,620,336,942,000 | 1,620,336,942,000 | 353,994,588 | 7 | 4 | Apache-2.0 | 1,622,410,748,000 | 1,617,361,732,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 293 | lean | macro "exacts" "[" ts:term,* "]" : tactic => do
let mut s <- `(tactic| done)
for t in ts.getElems.reverse do
s <- `(tactic| exact $t; $s)
s
def foo : Nat := by
exacts [0]
def bar : Nat × Nat := by
skip
apply Prod.mk
exacts [0,1]
--#print foo -- (0)
--#print bar -- (0, 1) |
f7b1319561094bd4dbfcd7756f8c49058b894cc6 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/setStructInstNotation.lean | 70cb188fb74d2fe9a506719711703c830e86bc10 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,283 | lean | structure Foo where
a : Nat
b : Nat
def bla (x : Foo) : IO Unit := do
let { a, b } := x
def Set (α : Type u) := α → Prop
def setOf {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) : Set α :=
p
namespace Set
protected def mem (a : α) (s : Set α) :=
s a
instance : Membership α (Set α) :=
⟨Set.mem⟩
protected def subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :=
∀ {a}, a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂
instance : EmptyCollection (Set α) :=
⟨λ a => false⟩
protected def insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : Set α :=
fun b => b = a ∨ b ∈ s
protected def singleton (a : α) : Set α :=
fun b => b = a
syntax "{" term,+ "}" : term
macro_rules
| `({$x:term}) => `(Set.singleton $x)
| `({$x:term, $xs:term,*}) => `(Set.insert $x {$xs:term,*})
#check { 1, 2 } -- Set Nat
end Set
def f1 (a b : Nat) : Set Nat :=
{ a, b }
def f2 (a b : Nat) : Foo :=
{ a, b }
def f3 (a b : Nat) :=
{ a, b }
#check f3 -- Nat → Nat → Set Nat
def f4 (a b : α) :=
{ a, b }
#check @f4 -- {α : Type u_1} → α → α → Set α
def f5 (a b : Nat) :=
{ a, b : Foo }
def boo1 (x : Foo) : IO Unit :=
let { a, b } := x
pure ()
def boo2 (x : Foo) : IO Unit := do
let { a, b } := x
pure ()
def boo3 (x : Nat → IO Foo) : IO Nat := do
let { a, b } ← x 0
return a + b
|
d63fbbcd2368d2f3662c7aab5ee2bf8953543262 | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /tests/lean/mp_forallelim.lean | 029c50efa80763e4622c2ed8b219e1615beffd67 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 243 | lean | variable p : Nat -> Nat -> Bool
check fun (a b c : Bool) (p : Nat -> Nat -> Bool) (n m : Nat)
(H : a → b → (forall x y, c → p (x + n) (x + m)))
(Ha : a)
(Hb : b)
(Hc : c),
H Ha Hb 0 1 Hc
|
46c06b6fe7961fa6a57bd4febebd67e571ead82e | 32317185abf7e7c963f4c67c190aec61af6b3628 | /hott/algebra/category/limits/functor_preserve.hlean | fd42ebc35417f95ef44e542772a59756eabb577d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Andrew-Zipperer-unorganized/lean | 198a2317f21198cd8d26e7085e484b86277f17f7 | dcb35008e1474a0abebe632b1dced120e5f8c009 | refs/heads/master | 1,622,526,520,945 | 1,453,576,559,000 | 1,454,612,842,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,458 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
Functors preserving limits
-/
import .colimits ..functor.yoneda ..functor.adjoint
open eq functor yoneda is_trunc nat_trans
namespace category
variables {I C D : Precategory} {F : I ⇒ C} {G : C ⇒ D}
/- notions of preservation of limits -/
definition preserves_limits_of_shape [class] (G : C ⇒ D) (I : Precategory)
[H : has_limits_of_shape C I] :=
Π(F : I ⇒ C), is_terminal (cone_obj_compose G (limit_cone F))
definition preserves_existing_limits_of_shape [class] (G : C ⇒ D) (I : Precategory) :=
Π(F : I ⇒ C) [H : has_terminal_object (cone F)],
is_terminal (cone_obj_compose G (terminal_object (cone F)))
definition preserves_existing_limits [class] (G : C ⇒ D) :=
Π(I : Precategory) (F : I ⇒ C) [H : has_terminal_object (cone F)],
is_terminal (cone_obj_compose G (terminal_object (cone F)))
definition preserves_limits [class] (G : C ⇒ D) [H : is_complete C] :=
Π(I : Precategory) [H : has_limits_of_shape C I] (F : I ⇒ C),
is_terminal (cone_obj_compose G (limit_cone F))
definition preserves_chosen_limits_of_shape [class] (G : C ⇒ D) (I : Precategory)
[H : has_limits_of_shape C I] [H : has_limits_of_shape D I] :=
Π(F : I ⇒ C), cone_obj_compose G (limit_cone F) = limit_cone (G ∘f F)
definition preserves_chosen_limits [class] (G : C ⇒ D)
[H : is_complete C] [H : is_complete D] :=
Π(I : Precategory) (F : I ⇒ C), cone_obj_compose G (limit_cone F) = limit_cone (G ∘f F)
/- basic instances -/
definition preserves_limits_of_shape_of_preserves_limits [instance] (G : C ⇒ D)
(I : Precategory) [H : is_complete C] [H : preserves_limits G]
: preserves_limits_of_shape G I := H I
definition preserves_chosen_limits_of_shape_of_preserves_chosen_limits [instance] (G : C ⇒ D)
(I : Precategory) [H : is_complete C] [H : is_complete D] [K : preserves_chosen_limits G]
: preserves_chosen_limits_of_shape G I := K I
/- yoneda preserves existing limits -/
local attribute Category.to.precategory category.to_precategory [constructor]
definition preserves_existing_limits_yoneda_embedding_lemma [constructor] (y : cone_obj F)
[H : is_terminal y] {G : Cᵒᵖ ⇒ cset} (η : constant_functor I G ⟹ ɏ ∘f F) :
G ⟹ hom_functor_left (cone_to_obj y) :=
begin
fapply nat_trans.mk: esimp,
{ intro c x, fapply to_hom_limit,
{ intro i, exact η i c x},
{ exact abstract begin
intro i j k,
exact !id_right⁻¹ ⬝ !assoc⁻¹ ⬝ ap0100 natural_map (naturality η k) c x end end
}},
-- [BUG] abstracting here creates multiple lemmas proving this fact
{ intro c c' f, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x,
rewrite [id_left], apply to_eq_hom_limit, intro i,
refine !assoc ⬝ _, rewrite to_hom_limit_commute,
refine _ ⬝ ap10 (naturality (η i) f) x, rewrite [▸*, id_left]}
-- abstracting here fails
end
-- print preserves_existing_limits_yoneda_embedding_lemma_11
theorem preserves_existing_limits_yoneda_embedding (C : Precategory)
: preserves_existing_limits (yoneda_embedding C) :=
begin
intro I F H Gη, induction H with y H, induction Gη with G η, esimp at *,
assert lem : Π (i : carrier I),
nat_trans_hom_functor_left (natural_map (cone_to_nat y) i)
∘n preserves_existing_limits_yoneda_embedding_lemma y η = natural_map η i,
{ intro i, apply nat_trans_eq, intro c, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x,
esimp, refine !assoc ⬝ !id_right ⬝ !to_hom_limit_commute},
fapply is_contr.mk,
{ fapply cone_hom.mk,
{ exact preserves_existing_limits_yoneda_embedding_lemma y η},
{ exact lem}},
{ intro v, apply cone_hom_eq, esimp, apply nat_trans_eq, esimp, intro c,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x, refine (to_eq_hom_limit _ _)⁻¹,
intro i, refine !id_right⁻¹ ⬝ !assoc⁻¹ ⬝ _,
exact ap0100 natural_map (cone_to_eq v i) c x}
end
/- left adjoint functors preserve limits -/
/- definition preserves_existing_limits_left_adjoint_lemma {C D : Precategory} (F : C ⇒ D)
[H : is_left_adjoint F] {I : Precategory} {G : I ⇒ C} (y : cone_obj G) [K : is_terminal y]
{d : carrier D} (η : constant_functor I d ⟹ F ∘f G) : d ⟶ to_fun_ob F (cone_to_obj y) :=
begin
let η := unit F, let θ := counit F, exact sorry
end
theorem preserves_existing_limits_left_adjoint {C D : Precategory} (F : C ⇒ D)
[H : is_left_adjoint F] : preserves_existing_limits F :=
begin
intro I G K dη, induction K with y K, induction dη with d η, esimp at *,
-- assert lem : Π (i : carrier I),
-- nat_trans_hom_functor_left (natural_map (cone_to_nat y) i)
-- ∘n preserves_existing_limits_yoneda_embedding_lemma y η = natural_map η i,
-- { intro i, apply nat_trans_eq, intro c, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x,
-- esimp, refine !assoc ⬝ !id_right ⬝ !to_hom_limit_commute},
fapply is_contr.mk,
{ fapply cone_hom.mk,
{ esimp, exact sorry},
{ exact lem}},
{ intro v, apply cone_hom_eq, esimp, apply nat_trans_eq, esimp, intro c,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x, refine (to_eq_hom_limit _ _)⁻¹,
intro i, refine !id_right⁻¹ ⬝ !assoc⁻¹ ⬝ _,
exact ap0100 natural_map (cone_to_eq v i) c x}
end-/
end category
|
45182a0c33b9b828db076119b1718d282cdb0faa | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/analysis/normed/group/pointwise.lean | 2b71c2037ff921ab4a53017e5cf4bf1cfcacaf9d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,537 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.normed.group.add_torsor
import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance
/-!
# Properties of pointwise addition of sets in normed groups
We explore the relationships between pointwise addition of sets in normed groups, and the norm.
Notably, we show that the sum of bounded sets remain bounded.
-/
open metric set
open_locale pointwise topological_space
section seminormed_add_comm_group
variables {E : Type*} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] {ε δ : ℝ} {s t : set E} {x y : E}
lemma bounded_iff_exists_norm_le : bounded s ↔ ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ s, ∥x∥ ≤ R :=
by simp [subset_def, bounded_iff_subset_ball (0 : E)]
alias bounded_iff_exists_norm_le ↔ metric.bounded.exists_norm_le _
lemma metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le (hs : metric.bounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∥x∥ ≤ R :=
begin
obtain ⟨R₀, hR₀⟩ := hs.exists_norm_le,
refine ⟨max R₀ 1, _, _⟩,
{ exact (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 1).trans_le (le_max_right R₀ 1) },
intros x hx,
exact (hR₀ x hx).trans (le_max_left _ _),
end
lemma metric.bounded.add (hs : bounded s) (ht : bounded t) : bounded (s + t) :=
begin
obtain ⟨Rs, hRs⟩ : ∃ (R : ℝ), ∀ x ∈ s, ∥x∥ ≤ R := hs.exists_norm_le,
obtain ⟨Rt, hRt⟩ : ∃ (R : ℝ), ∀ x ∈ t, ∥x∥ ≤ R := ht.exists_norm_le,
refine (bounded_iff_exists_norm_le).2 ⟨Rs + Rt, _⟩,
rintros z ⟨x, y, hx, hy, rfl⟩,
calc ∥x + y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... ≤ Rs + Rt : add_le_add (hRs x hx) (hRt y hy)
end
lemma metric.bounded.neg : bounded s → bounded (-s) :=
by { simp_rw [bounded_iff_exists_norm_le, ←image_neg, ball_image_iff, norm_neg], exact id }
lemma metric.bounded.sub (hs : bounded s) (ht : bounded t) : bounded (s - t) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg _ _).symm.subst $ hs.add ht.neg
section emetric
open emetric
lemma inf_edist_neg (x : E) (s : set E) : inf_edist (-x) s = inf_edist x (-s) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ r, by simp_rw [le_inf_edist, ←image_neg, ball_image_iff, edist_neg]
@[simp] lemma inf_edist_neg_neg (x : E) (s : set E) : inf_edist (-x) (-s) = inf_edist x s :=
by rw [inf_edist_neg, neg_neg]
end emetric
variables (ε δ s t x y)
@[simp] lemma neg_thickening : -thickening δ s = thickening δ (-s) :=
by { unfold thickening, simp_rw ←inf_edist_neg, refl }
@[simp] lemma neg_cthickening : -cthickening δ s = cthickening δ (-s) :=
by { unfold cthickening, simp_rw ←inf_edist_neg, refl }
@[simp] lemma neg_ball : -ball x δ = ball (-x) δ :=
by { unfold metric.ball, simp_rw ←dist_neg, refl }
@[simp] lemma neg_closed_ball : -closed_ball x δ = closed_ball (-x) δ :=
by { unfold metric.closed_ball, simp_rw ←dist_neg, refl }
lemma singleton_add_ball : {x} + ball y δ = ball (x + y) δ :=
by simp only [preimage_add_ball, image_add_left, singleton_add, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm y x]
lemma singleton_sub_ball : {x} - ball y δ = ball (x - y) δ :=
by simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_ball, singleton_add_ball]
lemma ball_add_singleton : ball x δ + {y} = ball (x + y) δ :=
by rw [add_comm, singleton_add_ball, add_comm y]
lemma ball_sub_singleton : ball x δ - {y} = ball (x - y) δ :=
by simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_singleton, ball_add_singleton]
lemma singleton_add_ball_zero : {x} + ball 0 δ = ball x δ := by simp
lemma singleton_sub_ball_zero : {x} - ball 0 δ = ball x δ := by simp [singleton_sub_ball]
lemma ball_zero_add_singleton : ball 0 δ + {x} = ball x δ := by simp [ball_add_singleton]
lemma ball_zero_sub_singleton : ball 0 δ - {x} = ball (-x) δ := by simp [ball_sub_singleton]
lemma vadd_ball_zero : x +ᵥ ball 0 δ = ball x δ := by simp
@[simp] lemma singleton_add_closed_ball : {x} + closed_ball y δ = closed_ball (x + y) δ :=
by simp only [add_comm y x, preimage_add_closed_ball, image_add_left, singleton_add, sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp] lemma singleton_sub_closed_ball : {x} - closed_ball y δ = closed_ball (x - y) δ :=
by simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_closed_ball, singleton_add_closed_ball]
@[simp] lemma closed_ball_add_singleton : closed_ball x δ + {y} = closed_ball (x + y) δ :=
by simp [add_comm _ {y}, add_comm y]
@[simp] lemma closed_ball_sub_singleton : closed_ball x δ - {y} = closed_ball (x - y) δ :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma singleton_add_closed_ball_zero : {x} + closed_ball 0 δ = closed_ball x δ := by simp
lemma singleton_sub_closed_ball_zero : {x} - closed_ball 0 δ = closed_ball x δ := by simp
lemma closed_ball_zero_add_singleton : closed_ball 0 δ + {x} = closed_ball x δ := by simp
lemma closed_ball_zero_sub_singleton : closed_ball 0 δ - {x} = closed_ball (-x) δ := by simp
@[simp] lemma vadd_closed_ball_zero : x +ᵥ closed_ball 0 δ = closed_ball x δ := by simp
lemma add_ball_zero : s + ball 0 δ = thickening δ s :=
begin
rw thickening_eq_bUnion_ball,
convert Union₂_add (λ x (_ : x ∈ s), {x}) (ball (0 : E) δ),
exact s.bUnion_of_singleton.symm,
ext x y,
simp_rw [singleton_add_ball, add_zero],
end
lemma sub_ball_zero : s - ball 0 δ = thickening δ s := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_ball_zero]
lemma ball_add_zero : ball 0 δ + s = thickening δ s := by rw [add_comm, add_ball_zero]
lemma ball_sub_zero : ball 0 δ - s = thickening δ (-s) := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, ball_add_zero]
@[simp] lemma add_ball : s + ball x δ = x +ᵥ thickening δ s :=
by rw [←vadd_ball_zero, add_vadd_comm, add_ball_zero]
@[simp] lemma sub_ball : s - ball x δ = -x +ᵥ thickening δ s := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma ball_add : ball x δ + s = x +ᵥ thickening δ s := by rw [add_comm, add_ball]
@[simp] lemma ball_sub : ball x δ - s = x +ᵥ thickening δ (-s) := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
variables {ε δ s t x y}
lemma is_compact.add_closed_ball_zero (hs : is_compact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
s + closed_ball 0 δ = cthickening δ s :=
begin
rw hs.cthickening_eq_bUnion_closed_ball hδ,
ext x,
simp only [mem_add, dist_eq_norm, exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_closed_ball,
exists_and_distrib_left, mem_closed_ball_zero_iff, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', exists_eq_right],
end
lemma is_compact.sub_closed_ball_zero (hs : is_compact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
s - closed_ball 0 δ = cthickening δ s :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, hs.add_closed_ball_zero hδ]
lemma is_compact.closed_ball_zero_add (hs : is_compact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
closed_ball 0 δ + s = cthickening δ s :=
by rw [add_comm, hs.add_closed_ball_zero hδ]
lemma is_compact.closed_ball_zero_sub (hs : is_compact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
closed_ball 0 δ - s = cthickening δ (-s) :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, hs.neg.add_closed_ball_zero hδ]
lemma is_compact.add_closed_ball (hs : is_compact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (x : E) :
s + closed_ball x δ = x +ᵥ cthickening δ s :=
by rw [←vadd_closed_ball_zero, add_vadd_comm, hs.add_closed_ball_zero hδ]
lemma is_compact.sub_closed_ball (hs : is_compact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (x : E) :
s - closed_ball x δ = -x +ᵥ cthickening δ s :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, hs.add_closed_ball hδ]
lemma is_compact.closed_ball_add (hs : is_compact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (x : E) :
closed_ball x δ + s = x +ᵥ cthickening δ s :=
by rw [add_comm, hs.add_closed_ball hδ]
lemma is_compact.closed_ball_sub (hs : is_compact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (x : E) :
closed_ball x δ + s = x +ᵥ cthickening δ s :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, hs.closed_ball_add hδ]
end seminormed_add_comm_group
|
cc35effd5dc6196a0b12d777786c702c03d601fb | 9a0b1b3a653ea926b03d1495fef64da1d14b3174 | /tidy/lib/parser.lean | 44a6461e47b856c9c85298f3356dabb2e62909ba | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | khoek/mathlib-tidy | 8623b27b4e04e7d598164e7eaf248610d58f768b | 866afa6ab597c47f1b72e8fe2b82b97fff5b980f | refs/heads/master | 1,585,598,975,772 | 1,538,659,544,000 | 1,538,659,544,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,600 | lean | import .interaction_monad
namespace lean.parser
open lean interactive.types
meta def opt_single_or_list {α : Type} (ps : lean.parser α) : lean.parser (list α) :=
list_of ps <|> ((λ h, list.cons h []) <$> ps) <|> return []
meta def cur_options : lean.parser options := λ s, interaction_monad.result.success (parser_state.options s) s
meta def emit_command_here (str : string) : lean.parser string := do
(_, left) ← with_input command_like str,
return left
meta def emit_code_here (str : string) : lean.parser unit := do
left ← emit_command_here str,
if left.length = 0 then return ()
else tactic.fail "did not parse all of passed code"
-- TODO polish up the `mk_*` family to be more robust, to the point where we take
-- the same arguments as environment.add
meta def var_string (v : name × expr) : string :=
"(" ++ to_string v.1 ++ " : " ++ to_string v.2 ++ ")"
-- FIXME at the moment attribute errors cause a red line at the top of the window
-- TODO support more compicated annotation syntax.
meta def mk_definition_here_raw (n : name) (vars : list (name × expr)) (type : option expr) (value : string) (is_meta : bool := ff) (annotations : list string := []) : lean.parser unit :=
emit_code_here $
(if annotations.length = 0 then "" else "@" ++ annotations.to_string ++ " ")
++ (if is_meta then "meta " else "") ++ "def " ++ to_string n
++ string.intercalate " " (vars.map var_string)
++ match type with | none := "" | some type := " : " ++ to_string type end
++ " := " ++ to_string value
meta def mk_definition_here (n : name) (vars : list (name × expr)) (type : option expr) (value : expr) (is_meta : bool := ff) (annotations : list name := []) : lean.parser unit :=
mk_definition_here_raw n vars type (to_string value) is_meta (annotations.map to_string)
-- TODO implement `mk_attribute_here`/`mk_attribute_here_raw`
open name
meta def chop_reserved_name (new_top_level : name := anonymous) : name → name
| anonymous := anonymous
| (mk_numeral n anonymous) := mk_string ("n" ++ to_string n) new_top_level
| (mk_string s anonymous) := mk_string s.to_list.tail.as_string new_top_level
| (mk_numeral n pfx) := mk_string ("n" ++ to_string n) $ chop_reserved_name pfx
| (mk_string s pfx) := mk_string s $ chop_reserved_name pfx
meta def mk_user_fresh_name (pfx : string := "") (sfx : string := "") : tactic name := do
let pfx_name := if pfx.length = 0 then anonymous else mk_string pfx anonymous,
chopped ← chop_reserved_name pfx_name <$> tactic.mk_fresh_name,
return $ if sfx.length = 0 then chopped else mk_string sfx chopped
meta inductive boxed_result (α : Type)
| success : α → boxed_result
| failure : format → boxed_result
meta def of_tactic_safe {α : Type} (t : tactic α) : lean.parser α := do
let tac : tactic (boxed_result α) := interaction_monad_orelse_intercept_safe (do
r ← t,
return $ boxed_result.success r
)
(λ e ref, return $ boxed_result.failure _ $ match e with
| some e := e ()
| none := "tactic failed"
end
)
(boxed_result.failure _ "tactic failed while handling tactic failed!"),
ret ← of_tactic tac,
match ret with
| boxed_result.success ret := return ret
| boxed_result.failure _ reason := interaction_monad.fail reason
end
meta def get_current_namespace : lean.parser name := do
n ← mk_user_fresh_name "secret" "ns___",
mk_definition_here_raw n [] `(unit) "()",
n ← tactic.resolve_constant n,
return $ (list.range 5).foldl (λ nn : name, λ _, nn.get_prefix) n
end lean.parser |
40a184cb46a90f503f8058cdc2bc9824384da3b6 | 5756a081670ba9c1d1d3fca7bd47cb4e31beae66 | /Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Tactic/Mathlib/Finish.lean | 210ce4ca6706be5904e67147436d99bc0697374b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathport | 2c9bdc8292168febf59799efdc5451dbf0450d4a | 13051f68064f7638970d39a8fecaede68ffbf9e1 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,841,364,079 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 379,357,010 | 27 | 10 | Apache-2.0 | 1,691,309,132,000 | 1,624,384,521,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,562 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Basic
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Lean3
open Lean
namespace Mathport.Translate.Tactic
open Parser
-- # tactic.finish
def trUsingList (args : Array (Spanned AST3.Expr)) : M Syntax :=
@mkNullNode <$> match args with
| #[] => pure #[]
| args => return #[mkAtom "using", (mkAtom ",").mkSep $ ← args.mapM trExpr]
@[tr_tactic clarify] def trClarify : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let hs := (← trSimpArgs (← parse simpArgList)).asNonempty
let ps := (← (← parse (tk "using" *> pExprListOrTExpr)?).getD #[] |>.mapM (trExpr ·)).asNonempty
let cfg ← liftM $ (← expr?).mapM trExpr
`(tactic| clarify $[(config := $cfg)]? $[[$hs,*]]? $[using $ps,*]?)
@[tr_tactic safe] def trSafe : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let hs := (← trSimpArgs (← parse simpArgList)).asNonempty
let ps := (← (← parse (tk "using" *> pExprListOrTExpr)?).getD #[] |>.mapM (trExpr ·)).asNonempty
let cfg ← liftM $ (← expr?).mapM trExpr
`(tactic| safe $[(config := $cfg)]? $[[$hs,*]]? $[using $ps,*]?)
@[tr_tactic finish] def trFinish : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let hs := (← trSimpArgs (← parse simpArgList)).asNonempty
let ps := (← (← parse (tk "using" *> pExprListOrTExpr)?).getD #[] |>.mapM (trExpr ·)).asNonempty
let cfg ← liftM $ (← expr?).mapM trExpr
`(tactic| finish $[(config := $cfg)]? $[[$hs,*]]? $[using $ps,*]?)
|
473aa0eadb819872c6a3b7f0394dfad52b0c4e3c | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /tests/leanpkg/b/B/Baz.lean | 4823066822f7a63ac154dbcbf0fbf6bc8ab1c511 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 31 | lean | import B.Foo
def baz := "baz"
|
d3fe891ed6e2783073f87ee3ca9b03ff16b2e508 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /test/split_ifs.lean | 4528cc3cd0dbfca9c3c32d8f01fe1be5b76ca7e3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 602 | lean | import tactic.split_ifs
example (p : Prop) [decidable p] (h : (if p then 1 else 2) > 3) : false :=
by split_ifs at h; repeat {cases h with h h}
example (p : Prop) [decidable p] (x : ℕ) (h : (if p then 1 else 2) > x) :
x < (if ¬p then 1 else 0) + 1 :=
by split_ifs at *; assumption
example (p : Prop) [decidable p] : if if ¬p then p else true then p else ¬p :=
by split_ifs; assumption
example (p q : Prop) [decidable p] [decidable q] :
if if if p then ¬p else q then p else q then q else ¬p ∨ ¬q :=
by split_ifs; simp *
example : true :=
by success_if_fail { split_ifs }; trivial |
c8819af428c47bcdbc6a0a75350d5b24731e90dd | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/topology/metric_space/gromov_hausdorff.lean | 80d6d2b3311bc08ec0d1c45f9c475c175c12b197 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 55,235 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import set_theory.cardinal.basic
import topology.metric_space.closeds
import topology.metric_space.completion
import topology.metric_space.gromov_hausdorff_realized
import topology.metric_space.kuratowski
/-!
# Gromov-Hausdorff distance
This file defines the Gromov-Hausdorff distance on the space of nonempty compact metric spaces
up to isometry.
We introduce the space of all nonempty compact metric spaces, up to isometry,
called `GH_space`, and endow it with a metric space structure. The distance,
known as the Gromov-Hausdorff distance, is defined as follows: given two
nonempty compact spaces `X` and `Y`, their distance is the minimum Hausdorff distance
between all possible isometric embeddings of `X` and `Y` in all metric spaces.
To define properly the Gromov-Hausdorff space, we consider the non-empty
compact subsets of `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` up to isometry, which is a well-defined type,
and define the distance as the infimum of the Hausdorff distance over all
embeddings in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`. We prove that this coincides with the previous description,
as all separable metric spaces embed isometrically into `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, through an
embedding called the Kuratowski embedding.
To prove that we have a distance, we should show that if spaces can be coupled
to be arbitrarily close, then they are isometric. More generally, the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance is realized, i.e., there is a coupling for which the Hausdorff distance
is exactly the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. This follows from a compactness
argument, essentially following from Arzela-Ascoli.
## Main results
We prove the most important properties of the Gromov-Hausdorff space: it is a polish space,
i.e., it is complete and second countable. We also prove the Gromov compactness criterion.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space ennreal
local notation `ℓ_infty_ℝ`:= lp (λ n : ℕ, ℝ) ∞
universes u v w
open classical set function topological_space filter metric quotient
open bounded_continuous_function nat int Kuratowski_embedding
open sum (inl inr)
local attribute [instance] metric_space_sum
namespace Gromov_Hausdorff
section GH_space
/- In this section, we define the Gromov-Hausdorff space, denoted `GH_space` as the quotient
of nonempty compact subsets of `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` by identifying isometric sets.
Using the Kuratwoski embedding, we get a canonical map `to_GH_space` mapping any nonempty
compact type to `GH_space`. -/
/-- Equivalence relation identifying two nonempty compact sets which are isometric -/
private def isometry_rel : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ → nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ → Prop :=
λ x y, nonempty (x ≃ᵢ y)
/-- This is indeed an equivalence relation -/
private lemma is_equivalence_isometry_rel : equivalence isometry_rel :=
⟨λ x, ⟨isometric.refl _⟩, λ x y ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.symm⟩, λ x y z ⟨e⟩ ⟨f⟩, ⟨e.trans f⟩⟩
/-- setoid instance identifying two isometric nonempty compact subspaces of ℓ^∞(ℝ) -/
instance isometry_rel.setoid : setoid (nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ) :=
setoid.mk isometry_rel is_equivalence_isometry_rel
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff space -/
definition GH_space : Type := quotient (isometry_rel.setoid)
/-- Map any nonempty compact type to `GH_space` -/
definition to_GH_space (X : Type u) [metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X] : GH_space :=
⟦nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding X⟧
instance : inhabited GH_space := ⟨quot.mk _ ⟨⟨{0}, is_compact_singleton⟩, singleton_nonempty _⟩⟩
/-- A metric space representative of any abstract point in `GH_space` -/
@[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def GH_space.rep (p : GH_space) : Type := (quotient.out p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ)
lemma eq_to_GH_space_iff {X : Type u} [metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X]
{p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ} :
⟦p⟧ = to_GH_space X ↔ ∃ Ψ : X → ℓ_infty_ℝ, isometry Ψ ∧ range Ψ = p :=
begin
simp only [to_GH_space, quotient.eq],
refine ⟨λ h, _, _⟩,
{ rcases setoid.symm h with ⟨e⟩,
have f := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry X).isometric_on_range.trans e,
use [λ x, f x, isometry_subtype_coe.comp f.isometry],
rw [range_comp, f.range_eq_univ, set.image_univ, subtype.range_coe],
refl },
{ rintros ⟨Ψ, ⟨isomΨ, rangeΨ⟩⟩,
have f := ((Kuratowski_embedding.isometry X).isometric_on_range.symm.trans
isomΨ.isometric_on_range).symm,
have E : (range Ψ ≃ᵢ nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding X) =
(p ≃ᵢ range (Kuratowski_embedding X)),
by { dunfold nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding, rw [rangeΨ]; refl },
exact ⟨cast E f⟩ }
end
lemma eq_to_GH_space {p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ} : ⟦p⟧ = to_GH_space p :=
eq_to_GH_space_iff.2 ⟨λ x, x, isometry_subtype_coe, subtype.range_coe⟩
section
local attribute [reducible] GH_space.rep
instance rep_GH_space_metric_space {p : GH_space} : metric_space p.rep := by apply_instance
instance rep_GH_space_compact_space {p : GH_space} : compact_space p.rep := by apply_instance
instance rep_GH_space_nonempty {p : GH_space} : nonempty p.rep := by apply_instance
end
lemma GH_space.to_GH_space_rep (p : GH_space) : to_GH_space p.rep = p :=
begin
change to_GH_space (quot.out p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ) = p,
rw ← eq_to_GH_space,
exact quot.out_eq p
end
/-- Two nonempty compact spaces have the same image in `GH_space` if and only if they are
isometric. -/
lemma to_GH_space_eq_to_GH_space_iff_isometric {X : Type u} [metric_space X] [compact_space X]
[nonempty X] {Y : Type v} [metric_space Y] [compact_space Y] [nonempty Y] :
to_GH_space X = to_GH_space Y ↔ nonempty (X ≃ᵢ Y) :=
⟨begin
simp only [to_GH_space, quotient.eq],
rintro ⟨e⟩,
have I : ((nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding X) ≃ᵢ
(nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding Y))
= ((range (Kuratowski_embedding X)) ≃ᵢ (range (Kuratowski_embedding Y))),
by { dunfold nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding, refl },
have f := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry X).isometric_on_range,
have g := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry Y).isometric_on_range.symm,
exact ⟨f.trans $ (cast I e).trans g⟩
end,
begin
rintro ⟨e⟩,
simp only [to_GH_space, quotient.eq],
have f := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry X).isometric_on_range.symm,
have g := (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry Y).isometric_on_range,
have I : ((range (Kuratowski_embedding X)) ≃ᵢ (range (Kuratowski_embedding Y))) =
((nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding X) ≃ᵢ
(nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding Y)),
by { dunfold nonempty_compacts.Kuratowski_embedding, refl },
exact ⟨cast I ((f.trans e).trans g)⟩
end⟩
/-- Distance on `GH_space`: the distance between two nonempty compact spaces is the infimum
Hausdorff distance between isometric copies of the two spaces in a metric space. For the definition,
we only consider embeddings in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, but we will prove below that it works for all spaces. -/
instance : has_dist (GH_space) :=
{ dist := λ x y, Inf $
(λ p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ,
Hausdorff_dist (p.1 : set ℓ_infty_ℝ) p.2) '' ({a | ⟦a⟧ = x} ×ˢ {b | ⟦b⟧ = y}) }
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two nonempty compact metric spaces, equal by definition to
the distance of the equivalence classes of these spaces in the Gromov-Hausdorff space. -/
def GH_dist (X : Type u) (Y : Type v) [metric_space X] [nonempty X] [compact_space X]
[metric_space Y] [nonempty Y] [compact_space Y] : ℝ := dist (to_GH_space X) (to_GH_space Y)
lemma dist_GH_dist (p q : GH_space) : dist p q = GH_dist p.rep (q.rep) :=
by rw [GH_dist, p.to_GH_space_rep, q.to_GH_space_rep]
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two spaces is bounded by the Hausdorff distance
of isometric copies of the spaces, in any metric space. -/
theorem GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist {X : Type u} [metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X]
{Y : Type v} [metric_space Y] [compact_space Y] [nonempty Y]
{γ : Type w} [metric_space γ] {Φ : X → γ} {Ψ : Y → γ} (ha : isometry Φ) (hb : isometry Ψ) :
GH_dist X Y ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range Φ) (range Ψ) :=
begin
/- For the proof, we want to embed `γ` in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, to say that the Hausdorff distance is realized
in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` and therefore bounded below by the Gromov-Hausdorff-distance. However, `γ` is not
separable in general. We restrict to the union of the images of `X` and `Y` in `γ`, which is
separable and therefore embeddable in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`. -/
rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty X with ⟨xX, _⟩,
let s : set γ := (range Φ) ∪ (range Ψ),
let Φ' : X → subtype s := λ y, ⟨Φ y, mem_union_left _ (mem_range_self _)⟩,
let Ψ' : Y → subtype s := λ y, ⟨Ψ y, mem_union_right _ (mem_range_self _)⟩,
have IΦ' : isometry Φ' := λ x y, ha x y,
have IΨ' : isometry Ψ' := λ x y, hb x y,
have : is_compact s, from (is_compact_range ha.continuous).union (is_compact_range hb.continuous),
letI : metric_space (subtype s) := by apply_instance,
haveI : compact_space (subtype s) := ⟨is_compact_iff_is_compact_univ.1 ‹is_compact s›⟩,
haveI : nonempty (subtype s) := ⟨Φ' xX⟩,
have ΦΦ' : Φ = subtype.val ∘ Φ', by { funext, refl },
have ΨΨ' : Ψ = subtype.val ∘ Ψ', by { funext, refl },
have : Hausdorff_dist (range Φ) (range Ψ) = Hausdorff_dist (range Φ') (range Ψ'),
{ rw [ΦΦ', ΨΨ', range_comp, range_comp],
exact Hausdorff_dist_image (isometry_subtype_coe) },
rw this,
-- Embed `s` in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)` through its Kuratowski embedding
let F := Kuratowski_embedding (subtype s),
have : Hausdorff_dist (F '' (range Φ')) (F '' (range Ψ')) =
Hausdorff_dist (range Φ') (range Ψ') := Hausdorff_dist_image (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _),
rw ← this,
-- Let `A` and `B` be the images of `X` and `Y` under this embedding. They are in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, and
-- their Hausdorff distance is the same as in the original space.
let A : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ := ⟨⟨F '' (range Φ'), (is_compact_range IΦ'.continuous).image
(Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).continuous⟩, (range_nonempty _).image _⟩,
let B : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ := ⟨⟨F '' (range Ψ'), (is_compact_range IΨ'.continuous).image
(Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).continuous⟩, (range_nonempty _).image _⟩,
have AX : ⟦A⟧ = to_GH_space X,
{ rw eq_to_GH_space_iff,
exact ⟨λ x, F (Φ' x), (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).comp IΦ', range_comp _ _⟩ },
have BY : ⟦B⟧ = to_GH_space Y,
{ rw eq_to_GH_space_iff,
exact ⟨λ x, F (Ψ' x), (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).comp IΨ', range_comp _ _⟩ },
refine cInf_le ⟨0,
begin simp [lower_bounds], assume t _ _ _ _ ht, rw ← ht, exact Hausdorff_dist_nonneg end⟩ _,
apply (mem_image _ _ _).2,
existsi (⟨A, B⟩ : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ),
simp [AX, BY],
end
/-- The optimal coupling constructed above realizes exactly the Gromov-Hausdorff distance,
essentially by design. -/
lemma Hausdorff_dist_optimal {X : Type u} [metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X]
{Y : Type v} [metric_space Y] [compact_space Y] [nonempty Y] :
Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y)) (range (optimal_GH_injr X Y)) = GH_dist X Y :=
begin
inhabit X, inhabit Y,
/- we only need to check the inequality `≤`, as the other one follows from the previous lemma.
As the Gromov-Hausdorff distance is an infimum, we need to check that the Hausdorff distance
in the optimal coupling is smaller than the Hausdorff distance of any coupling.
First, we check this for couplings which already have small Hausdorff distance: in this
case, the induced "distance" on `X ⊕ Y` belongs to the candidates family introduced in the
definition of the optimal coupling, and the conclusion follows from the optimality
of the optimal coupling within this family.
-/
have A : ∀ p q : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ, ⟦p⟧ = to_GH_space X → ⟦q⟧ = to_GH_space Y →
Hausdorff_dist (p : set ℓ_infty_ℝ) q < diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y) →
Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y)) (range (optimal_GH_injr X Y)) ≤
Hausdorff_dist (p : set ℓ_infty_ℝ) q,
{ assume p q hp hq bound,
rcases eq_to_GH_space_iff.1 hp with ⟨Φ, ⟨Φisom, Φrange⟩⟩,
rcases eq_to_GH_space_iff.1 hq with ⟨Ψ, ⟨Ψisom, Ψrange⟩⟩,
have I : diam (range Φ ∪ range Ψ) ≤ 2 * diam (univ : set X) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set Y),
{ rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty X with ⟨xX, _⟩,
have : ∃ y ∈ range Ψ, dist (Φ xX) y < diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y),
{ rw Ψrange,
have : Φ xX ∈ ↑p := Φrange.subst (mem_range_self _),
exact exists_dist_lt_of_Hausdorff_dist_lt this bound
(Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded p.nonempty q.nonempty
p.compact.bounded q.compact.bounded) },
rcases this with ⟨y, hy, dy⟩,
rcases mem_range.1 hy with ⟨z, hzy⟩,
rw ← hzy at dy,
have DΦ : diam (range Φ) = diam (univ : set X) := Φisom.diam_range,
have DΨ : diam (range Ψ) = diam (univ : set Y) := Ψisom.diam_range,
calc
diam (range Φ ∪ range Ψ) ≤ diam (range Φ) + dist (Φ xX) (Ψ z) + diam (range Ψ) :
diam_union (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _)
... ≤ diam (univ : set X) + (diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y)) +
diam (univ : set Y) :
by { rw [DΦ, DΨ], apply add_le_add (add_le_add le_rfl (le_of_lt dy)) le_rfl }
... = 2 * diam (univ : set X) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set Y) : by ring },
let f : X ⊕ Y → ℓ_infty_ℝ := λ x, match x with | inl y := Φ y | inr z := Ψ z end,
let F : (X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y) → ℝ := λ p, dist (f p.1) (f p.2),
-- check that the induced "distance" is a candidate
have Fgood : F ∈ candidates X Y,
{ simp only [candidates, forall_const, and_true, add_comm, eq_self_iff_true, dist_eq_zero,
and_self, set.mem_set_of_eq],
repeat {split},
{ exact λ x y, calc
F (inl x, inl y) = dist (Φ x) (Φ y) : rfl
... = dist x y : Φisom.dist_eq x y },
{ exact λ x y, calc
F (inr x, inr y) = dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y) : rfl
... = dist x y : Ψisom.dist_eq x y },
{ exact λ x y, dist_comm _ _ },
{ exact λ x y z, dist_triangle _ _ _ },
{ exact λ x y, calc
F (x, y) ≤ diam (range Φ ∪ range Ψ) :
begin
have A : ∀ z : X ⊕ Y, f z ∈ range Φ ∪ range Ψ,
{ assume z,
cases z,
{ apply mem_union_left, apply mem_range_self },
{ apply mem_union_right, apply mem_range_self } },
refine dist_le_diam_of_mem _ (A _) (A _),
rw [Φrange, Ψrange],
exact (p ⊔ q).compact.bounded,
end
... ≤ 2 * diam (univ : set X) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set Y) : I } },
let Fb := candidates_b_of_candidates F Fgood,
have : Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y)) (range (optimal_GH_injr X Y)) ≤ HD Fb :=
Hausdorff_dist_optimal_le_HD _ _ (candidates_b_of_candidates_mem F Fgood),
refine le_trans this (le_of_forall_le_of_dense (λ r hr, _)),
have I1 : ∀ x : X, (⨅ y, Fb (inl x, inr y)) ≤ r,
{ assume x,
have : f (inl x) ∈ ↑p := Φrange.subst (mem_range_self _),
rcases exists_dist_lt_of_Hausdorff_dist_lt this hr
(Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded p.nonempty q.nonempty
p.compact.bounded q.compact.bounded)
with ⟨z, zq, hz⟩,
have : z ∈ range Ψ, by rwa [← Ψrange] at zq,
rcases mem_range.1 this with ⟨y, hy⟩,
calc (⨅ y, Fb (inl x, inr y)) ≤ Fb (inl x, inr y) :
cinfi_le (by simpa using HD_below_aux1 0) y
... = dist (Φ x) (Ψ y) : rfl
... = dist (f (inl x)) z : by rw hy
... ≤ r : le_of_lt hz },
have I2 : ∀ y : Y, (⨅ x, Fb (inl x, inr y)) ≤ r,
{ assume y,
have : f (inr y) ∈ ↑q := Ψrange.subst (mem_range_self _),
rcases exists_dist_lt_of_Hausdorff_dist_lt' this hr
(Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded p.nonempty q.nonempty
p.compact.bounded q.compact.bounded)
with ⟨z, zq, hz⟩,
have : z ∈ range Φ, by rwa [← Φrange] at zq,
rcases mem_range.1 this with ⟨x, hx⟩,
calc (⨅ x, Fb (inl x, inr y)) ≤ Fb (inl x, inr y) :
cinfi_le (by simpa using HD_below_aux2 0) x
... = dist (Φ x) (Ψ y) : rfl
... = dist z (f (inr y)) : by rw hx
... ≤ r : le_of_lt hz },
simp [HD, csupr_le I1, csupr_le I2] },
/- Get the same inequality for any coupling. If the coupling is quite good, the desired
inequality has been proved above. If it is bad, then the inequality is obvious. -/
have B : ∀ p q : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ, ⟦p⟧ = to_GH_space X → ⟦q⟧ = to_GH_space Y →
Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y)) (range (optimal_GH_injr X Y)) ≤
Hausdorff_dist (p : set ℓ_infty_ℝ) q,
{ assume p q hp hq,
by_cases h :
Hausdorff_dist (p : set ℓ_infty_ℝ) q < diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y),
{ exact A p q hp hq h },
{ calc Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y)) (range (optimal_GH_injr X Y))
≤ HD (candidates_b_dist X Y) :
Hausdorff_dist_optimal_le_HD _ _ (candidates_b_dist_mem_candidates_b)
... ≤ diam (univ : set X) + 1 + diam (univ : set Y) : HD_candidates_b_dist_le
... ≤ Hausdorff_dist (p : set ℓ_infty_ℝ) q : not_lt.1 h } },
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ apply le_cInf,
{ refine (set.nonempty.prod _ _).image _; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro b ⟨⟨p, q⟩, ⟨hp, hq⟩, rfl⟩,
exact B p q hp hq } },
{ exact GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist (isometry_optimal_GH_injl X Y) (isometry_optimal_GH_injr X Y) }
end
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance can also be realized by a coupling in `ℓ^∞(ℝ)`, by embedding
the optimal coupling through its Kuratowski embedding. -/
theorem GH_dist_eq_Hausdorff_dist (X : Type u) [metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X]
(Y : Type v) [metric_space Y] [compact_space Y] [nonempty Y] :
∃ Φ : X → ℓ_infty_ℝ, ∃ Ψ : Y → ℓ_infty_ℝ, isometry Φ ∧ isometry Ψ ∧
GH_dist X Y = Hausdorff_dist (range Φ) (range Ψ) :=
begin
let F := Kuratowski_embedding (optimal_GH_coupling X Y),
let Φ := F ∘ optimal_GH_injl X Y,
let Ψ := F ∘ optimal_GH_injr X Y,
refine ⟨Φ, Ψ, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injl X Y) },
{ exact (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injr X Y) },
{ rw [← image_univ, ← image_univ, image_comp F, image_univ, image_comp F (optimal_GH_injr X Y),
image_univ, ← Hausdorff_dist_optimal],
exact (Hausdorff_dist_image (Kuratowski_embedding.isometry _)).symm },
end
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff distance defines a genuine distance on the Gromov-Hausdorff space. -/
instance : metric_space GH_space :=
{ dist := dist,
dist_self := λ x, begin
rcases exists_rep x with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ apply cInf_le,
{ exact ⟨0, by { rintro b ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨hu, hv⟩, rfl⟩, exact Hausdorff_dist_nonneg } ⟩},
{ simp, existsi [y, y], simpa } },
{ apply le_cInf,
{ exact (nonempty.prod ⟨y, hy⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩).image _ },
{ rintro b ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨hu, hv⟩, rfl⟩, exact Hausdorff_dist_nonneg } },
end,
dist_comm := λ x y, begin
have A : (λ (p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ),
Hausdorff_dist (p.1 : set ℓ_infty_ℝ) p.2) ''
({a | ⟦a⟧ = x} ×ˢ {b | ⟦b⟧ = y})
= ((λ (p : nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ × nonempty_compacts ℓ_infty_ℝ),
Hausdorff_dist (p.1 : set ℓ_infty_ℝ) p.2) ∘ prod.swap) ''
({a | ⟦a⟧ = x} ×ˢ {b | ⟦b⟧ = y}) :=
by { congr, funext, simp, rw Hausdorff_dist_comm },
simp only [dist, A, image_comp, image_swap_prod],
end,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y hxy, begin
/- To show that two spaces at zero distance are isometric, we argue that the distance
is realized by some coupling. In this coupling, the two spaces are at zero Hausdorff distance,
i.e., they coincide. Therefore, the original spaces are isometric. -/
rcases GH_dist_eq_Hausdorff_dist x.rep y.rep with ⟨Φ, Ψ, Φisom, Ψisom, DΦΨ⟩,
rw [← dist_GH_dist, hxy] at DΦΨ,
have : range Φ = range Ψ,
{ have hΦ : is_compact (range Φ) := is_compact_range Φisom.continuous,
have hΨ : is_compact (range Ψ) := is_compact_range Ψisom.continuous,
apply (is_closed.Hausdorff_dist_zero_iff_eq _ _ _).1 (DΦΨ.symm),
{ exact hΦ.is_closed },
{ exact hΨ.is_closed },
{ exact Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded (range_nonempty _)
(range_nonempty _) hΦ.bounded hΨ.bounded } },
have T : ((range Ψ) ≃ᵢ y.rep) = ((range Φ) ≃ᵢ y.rep), by rw this,
have eΨ := cast T Ψisom.isometric_on_range.symm,
have e := Φisom.isometric_on_range.trans eΨ,
rw [← x.to_GH_space_rep, ← y.to_GH_space_rep, to_GH_space_eq_to_GH_space_iff_isometric],
exact ⟨e⟩
end,
dist_triangle := λ x y z, begin
/- To show the triangular inequality between `X`, `Y` and `Z`, realize an optimal coupling
between `X` and `Y` in a space `γ1`, and an optimal coupling between `Y` and `Z` in a space
`γ2`. Then, glue these metric spaces along `Y`. We get a new space `γ` in which `X` and `Y` are
optimally coupled, as well as `Y` and `Z`. Apply the triangle inequality for the Hausdorff
distance in `γ` to conclude. -/
let X := x.rep,
let Y := y.rep,
let Z := z.rep,
let γ1 := optimal_GH_coupling X Y,
let γ2 := optimal_GH_coupling Y Z,
let Φ : Y → γ1 := optimal_GH_injr X Y,
have hΦ : isometry Φ := isometry_optimal_GH_injr X Y,
let Ψ : Y → γ2 := optimal_GH_injl Y Z,
have hΨ : isometry Ψ := isometry_optimal_GH_injl Y Z,
let γ := glue_space hΦ hΨ,
letI : metric_space γ := metric.metric_space_glue_space hΦ hΨ,
have Comm : (to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr X Y) =
(to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injl Y Z) := to_glue_commute hΦ hΨ,
calc dist x z = dist (to_GH_space X) (to_GH_space Z) :
by rw [x.to_GH_space_rep, z.to_GH_space_rep]
... ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injl X Y)))
(range ((to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr Y Z))) :
GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist
((to_glue_l_isometry hΦ hΨ).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injl X Y))
((to_glue_r_isometry hΦ hΨ).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injr Y Z))
... ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injl X Y)))
(range ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr X Y)))
+ Hausdorff_dist (range ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr X Y)))
(range ((to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) ∘ (optimal_GH_injr Y Z))) :
begin
refine Hausdorff_dist_triangle (Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded
(range_nonempty _) (range_nonempty _) _ _),
{ exact (is_compact_range (isometry.continuous ((to_glue_l_isometry hΦ hΨ).comp
(isometry_optimal_GH_injl X Y)))).bounded },
{ exact (is_compact_range (isometry.continuous ((to_glue_l_isometry hΦ hΨ).comp
(isometry_optimal_GH_injr X Y)))).bounded }
end
... = Hausdorff_dist ((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) '' (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y)))
((to_glue_l hΦ hΨ) '' (range (optimal_GH_injr X Y)))
+ Hausdorff_dist ((to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) '' (range (optimal_GH_injl Y Z)))
((to_glue_r hΦ hΨ) '' (range (optimal_GH_injr Y Z))) :
by simp only [← range_comp, Comm, eq_self_iff_true, add_right_inj]
... = Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl X Y))
(range (optimal_GH_injr X Y))
+ Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl Y Z))
(range (optimal_GH_injr Y Z)) :
by rw [Hausdorff_dist_image (to_glue_l_isometry hΦ hΨ),
Hausdorff_dist_image (to_glue_r_isometry hΦ hΨ)]
... = dist (to_GH_space X) (to_GH_space Y) + dist (to_GH_space Y) (to_GH_space Z) :
by rw [Hausdorff_dist_optimal, Hausdorff_dist_optimal, GH_dist, GH_dist]
... = dist x y + dist y z:
by rw [x.to_GH_space_rep, y.to_GH_space_rep, z.to_GH_space_rep]
end }
end GH_space --section
end Gromov_Hausdorff
/-- In particular, nonempty compacts of a metric space map to `GH_space`. We register this
in the topological_space namespace to take advantage of the notation `p.to_GH_space`. -/
definition topological_space.nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space {X : Type u} [metric_space X]
(p : nonempty_compacts X) : Gromov_Hausdorff.GH_space := Gromov_Hausdorff.to_GH_space p
open topological_space
namespace Gromov_Hausdorff
section nonempty_compacts
variables {X : Type u} [metric_space X]
theorem GH_dist_le_nonempty_compacts_dist (p q : nonempty_compacts X) :
dist p.to_GH_space q.to_GH_space ≤ dist p q :=
begin
have ha : isometry (coe : p → X) := isometry_subtype_coe,
have hb : isometry (coe : q → X) := isometry_subtype_coe,
have A : dist p q = Hausdorff_dist (p : set X) q := rfl,
have I : ↑p = range (coe : p → X) := subtype.range_coe_subtype.symm,
have J : ↑q = range (coe : q → X) := subtype.range_coe_subtype.symm,
rw [A, I, J],
exact GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist ha hb
end
lemma to_GH_space_lipschitz :
lipschitz_with 1 (nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space : nonempty_compacts X → GH_space) :=
lipschitz_with.mk_one GH_dist_le_nonempty_compacts_dist
lemma to_GH_space_continuous :
continuous (nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space : nonempty_compacts X → GH_space) :=
to_GH_space_lipschitz.continuous
end nonempty_compacts
section
/- In this section, we show that if two metric spaces are isometric up to `ε₂`, then their
Gromov-Hausdorff distance is bounded by `ε₂ / 2`. More generally, if there are subsets which are
`ε₁`-dense and `ε₃`-dense in two spaces, and isometric up to `ε₂`, then the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance between the spaces is bounded by `ε₁ + ε₂/2 + ε₃`. For this, we construct a suitable
coupling between the two spaces, by gluing them (approximately) along the two matching subsets. -/
variables {X : Type u} [metric_space X] [compact_space X] [nonempty X]
{Y : Type v} [metric_space Y] [compact_space Y] [nonempty Y]
-- we want to ignore these instances in the following theorem
local attribute [instance, priority 10] sum.topological_space sum.uniform_space
/-- If there are subsets which are `ε₁`-dense and `ε₃`-dense in two spaces, and
isometric up to `ε₂`, then the Gromov-Hausdorff distance between the spaces is bounded by
`ε₁ + ε₂/2 + ε₃`. -/
theorem GH_dist_le_of_approx_subsets {s : set X} (Φ : s → Y) {ε₁ ε₂ ε₃ : ℝ}
(hs : ∀ x : X, ∃ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ ε₁) (hs' : ∀ x : Y, ∃ y : s, dist x (Φ y) ≤ ε₃)
(H : ∀ x y : s, |dist x y - dist (Φ x) (Φ y)| ≤ ε₂) :
GH_dist X Y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ / 2 + ε₃ :=
begin
refine le_of_forall_pos_le_add (λ δ δ0, _),
rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty X with ⟨xX, _⟩,
rcases hs xX with ⟨xs, hxs, Dxs⟩,
have sne : s.nonempty := ⟨xs, hxs⟩,
letI : nonempty s := sne.to_subtype,
have : 0 ≤ ε₂ := le_trans (abs_nonneg _) (H ⟨xs, hxs⟩ ⟨xs, hxs⟩),
have : ∀ p q : s, |dist p q - dist (Φ p) (Φ q)| ≤ 2 * (ε₂/2 + δ) := λ p q, calc
|dist p q - dist (Φ p) (Φ q)| ≤ ε₂ : H p q
... ≤ 2 * (ε₂/2 + δ) : by linarith,
-- glue `X` and `Y` along the almost matching subsets
letI : metric_space (X ⊕ Y) :=
glue_metric_approx (λ x:s, (x:X)) (λ x, Φ x) (ε₂/2 + δ) (by linarith) this,
let Fl := @sum.inl X Y,
let Fr := @sum.inr X Y,
have Il : isometry Fl := isometry.of_dist_eq (λ x y, rfl),
have Ir : isometry Fr := isometry.of_dist_eq (λ x y, rfl),
/- The proof goes as follows : the `GH_dist` is bounded by the Hausdorff distance of the images
in the coupling, which is bounded (using the triangular inequality) by the sum of the Hausdorff
distances of `X` and `s` (in the coupling or, equivalently in the original space), of `s` and
`Φ s`, and of `Φ s` and `Y` (in the coupling or, equivalently, in the original space). The first
term is bounded by `ε₁`, by `ε₁`-density. The third one is bounded by `ε₃`. And the middle one is
bounded by `ε₂/2` as in the coupling the points `x` and `Φ x` are at distance `ε₂/2` by
construction of the coupling (in fact `ε₂/2 + δ` where `δ` is an arbitrarily small positive
constant where positivity is used to ensure that the coupling is really a metric space and not a
premetric space on `X ⊕ Y`). -/
have : GH_dist X Y ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range Fl) (range Fr) :=
GH_dist_le_Hausdorff_dist Il Ir,
have : Hausdorff_dist (range Fl) (range Fr) ≤ Hausdorff_dist (range Fl) (Fl '' s)
+ Hausdorff_dist (Fl '' s) (range Fr),
{ have B : bounded (range Fl) := (is_compact_range Il.continuous).bounded,
exact Hausdorff_dist_triangle (Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded
(range_nonempty _) (sne.image _) B (B.mono (image_subset_range _ _))) },
have : Hausdorff_dist (Fl '' s) (range Fr) ≤ Hausdorff_dist (Fl '' s) (Fr '' (range Φ))
+ Hausdorff_dist (Fr '' (range Φ)) (range Fr),
{ have B : bounded (range Fr) := (is_compact_range Ir.continuous).bounded,
exact Hausdorff_dist_triangle' (Hausdorff_edist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded
((range_nonempty _).image _) (range_nonempty _)
(bounded.mono (image_subset_range _ _) B) B) },
have : Hausdorff_dist (range Fl) (Fl '' s) ≤ ε₁,
{ rw [← image_univ, Hausdorff_dist_image Il],
have : 0 ≤ ε₁ := le_trans dist_nonneg Dxs,
refine Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist this (λ x hx, hs x)
(λ x hx, ⟨x, mem_univ _, by simpa⟩) },
have : Hausdorff_dist (Fl '' s) (Fr '' (range Φ)) ≤ ε₂/2 + δ,
{ refine Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist (by linarith) _ _,
{ assume x' hx',
rcases (set.mem_image _ _ _).1 hx' with ⟨x, ⟨x_in_s, xx'⟩⟩,
rw ← xx',
use [Fr (Φ ⟨x, x_in_s⟩), mem_image_of_mem Fr (mem_range_self _)],
exact le_of_eq (glue_dist_glued_points (λ x:s, (x:X)) Φ (ε₂/2 + δ) ⟨x, x_in_s⟩) },
{ assume x' hx',
rcases (set.mem_image _ _ _).1 hx' with ⟨y, ⟨y_in_s', yx'⟩⟩,
rcases mem_range.1 y_in_s' with ⟨x, xy⟩,
use [Fl x, mem_image_of_mem _ x.2],
rw [← yx', ← xy, dist_comm],
exact le_of_eq (glue_dist_glued_points (@subtype.val X s) Φ (ε₂/2 + δ) x) } },
have : Hausdorff_dist (Fr '' (range Φ)) (range Fr) ≤ ε₃,
{ rw [← @image_univ _ _ Fr, Hausdorff_dist_image Ir],
rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty Y with ⟨xY, _⟩,
rcases hs' xY with ⟨xs', Dxs'⟩,
have : 0 ≤ ε₃ := le_trans dist_nonneg Dxs',
refine Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist this (λ x hx, ⟨x, mem_univ _, by simpa⟩) (λ x _, _),
rcases hs' x with ⟨y, Dy⟩,
exact ⟨Φ y, mem_range_self _, Dy⟩ },
linarith
end
end --section
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff space is second countable. -/
instance : second_countable_topology GH_space :=
begin
refine second_countable_of_countable_discretization (λ δ δpos, _),
let ε := (2/5) * δ,
have εpos : 0 < ε := mul_pos (by norm_num) δpos,
have : ∀ p:GH_space, ∃ s : set p.rep, s.finite ∧ (univ ⊆ (⋃x∈s, ball x ε)) :=
λ p, by simpa using finite_cover_balls_of_compact (@compact_univ p.rep _ _) εpos,
-- for each `p`, `s p` is a finite `ε`-dense subset of `p` (or rather the metric space
-- `p.rep` representing `p`)
choose s hs using this,
have : ∀ p:GH_space, ∀ t:set p.rep, t.finite → ∃ n:ℕ, ∃ e:equiv t (fin n), true,
{ assume p t ht,
letI : fintype t := finite.fintype ht,
exact ⟨fintype.card t, fintype.equiv_fin t, trivial⟩ },
choose N e hne using this,
-- cardinality of the nice finite subset `s p` of `p.rep`, called `N p`
let N := λ p:GH_space, N p (s p) (hs p).1,
-- equiv from `s p`, a nice finite subset of `p.rep`, to `fin (N p)`, called `E p`
let E := λ p:GH_space, e p (s p) (hs p).1,
-- A function `F` associating to `p : GH_space` the data of all distances between points
-- in the `ε`-dense set `s p`.
let F : GH_space → Σn:ℕ, (fin n → fin n → ℤ) :=
λp, ⟨N p, λa b, ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist ((E p).symm a) ((E p).symm b)⌋⟩,
refine ⟨Σ n, fin n → fin n → ℤ, by apply_instance, F, λp q hpq, _⟩,
/- As the target space of F is countable, it suffices to show that two points
`p` and `q` with `F p = F q` are at distance `≤ δ`.
For this, we construct a map `Φ` from `s p ⊆ p.rep` (representing `p`)
to `q.rep` (representing `q`) which is almost an isometry on `s p`, and
with image `s q`. For this, we compose the identification of `s p` with `fin (N p)`
and the inverse of the identification of `s q` with `fin (N q)`. Together with
the fact that `N p = N q`, this constructs `Ψ` between `s p` and `s q`, and then
composing with the canonical inclusion we get `Φ`. -/
have Npq : N p = N q := (sigma.mk.inj_iff.1 hpq).1,
let Ψ : s p → s q := λ x, (E q).symm (fin.cast Npq ((E p) x)),
let Φ : s p → q.rep := λ x, Ψ x,
-- Use the almost isometry `Φ` to show that `p.rep` and `q.rep`
-- are within controlled Gromov-Hausdorff distance.
have main : GH_dist p.rep q.rep ≤ ε + ε/2 + ε,
{ refine GH_dist_le_of_approx_subsets Φ _ _ _,
show ∀ x : p.rep, ∃ (y : p.rep) (H : y ∈ s p), dist x y ≤ ε,
{ -- by construction, `s p` is `ε`-dense
assume x,
have : x ∈ ⋃y∈(s p), ball y ε := (hs p).2 (mem_univ _),
rcases mem_Union₂.1 this with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
exact ⟨y, ys, le_of_lt hy⟩ },
show ∀ x : q.rep, ∃ (z : s p), dist x (Φ z) ≤ ε,
{ -- by construction, `s q` is `ε`-dense, and it is the range of `Φ`
assume x,
have : x ∈ ⋃y∈(s q), ball y ε := (hs q).2 (mem_univ _),
rcases mem_Union₂.1 this with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
let i : ℕ := E q ⟨y, ys⟩,
let hi := ((E q) ⟨y, ys⟩).is_lt,
have ihi_eq : (⟨i, hi⟩ : fin (N q)) = (E q) ⟨y, ys⟩, by rw [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_mk],
have hiq : i < N q := hi,
have hip : i < N p, { rwa Npq.symm at hiq },
let z := (E p).symm ⟨i, hip⟩,
use z,
have C1 : (E p) z = ⟨i, hip⟩ := (E p).apply_symm_apply ⟨i, hip⟩,
have C2 : fin.cast Npq ⟨i, hip⟩ = ⟨i, hi⟩ := rfl,
have C3 : (E q).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ = ⟨y, ys⟩,
by { rw ihi_eq, exact (E q).symm_apply_apply ⟨y, ys⟩ },
have : Φ z = y :=
by { simp only [Φ, Ψ], rw [C1, C2, C3], refl },
rw this,
exact le_of_lt hy },
show ∀ x y : s p, |dist x y - dist (Φ x) (Φ y)| ≤ ε,
{ /- the distance between `x` and `y` is encoded in `F p`, and the distance between
`Φ x` and `Φ y` (two points of `s q`) is encoded in `F q`, all this up to `ε`.
As `F p = F q`, the distances are almost equal. -/
assume x y,
have : dist (Φ x) (Φ y) = dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y) := rfl,
rw this,
-- introduce `i`, that codes both `x` and `Φ x` in `fin (N p) = fin (N q)`
let i : ℕ := E p x,
have hip : i < N p := ((E p) x).2,
have hiq : i < N q, by rwa Npq at hip,
have i' : i = ((E q) (Ψ x)), by { simp [Ψ] },
-- introduce `j`, that codes both `y` and `Φ y` in `fin (N p) = fin (N q)`
let j : ℕ := E p y,
have hjp : j < N p := ((E p) y).2,
have hjq : j < N q, by rwa Npq at hjp,
have j' : j = ((E q) (Ψ y)).1, by { simp [Ψ] },
-- Express `dist x y` in terms of `F p`
have : (F p).2 ((E p) x) ((E p) y) = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y),
by simp only [F, (E p).symm_apply_apply],
have Ap : (F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩ = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist x y),
by { rw ← this, congr; apply fin.ext_iff.2; refl },
-- Express `dist (Φ x) (Φ y)` in terms of `F q`
have : (F q).2 ((E q) (Ψ x)) ((E q) (Ψ y)) = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)),
by simp only [F, (E q).symm_apply_apply],
have Aq : (F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩ = floor (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)),
by { rw ← this, congr; apply fin.ext_iff.2; [exact i', exact j'] },
-- use the equality between `F p` and `F q` to deduce that the distances have equal
-- integer parts
have : (F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩ = (F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩,
{ -- we want to `subst hpq` where `hpq : F p = F q`, except that `subst` only works
-- with a constant, so replace `F q` (and everything that depends on it) by a constant `f`
-- then `subst`
revert hiq hjq,
change N q with (F q).1,
generalize_hyp : F q = f at hpq ⊢,
subst hpq,
intros,
refl },
rw [Ap, Aq] at this,
-- deduce that the distances coincide up to `ε`, by a straightforward computation
-- that should be automated
have I := calc
|ε⁻¹| * |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)| =
|ε⁻¹ * (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))| : (abs_mul _ _).symm
... = |(ε⁻¹ * dist x y) - (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))| : by { congr, ring }
... ≤ 1 : le_of_lt (abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor this),
calc
|dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)| = (ε * ε⁻¹) * |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)| :
by rw [mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt εpos), one_mul]
... = ε * (|ε⁻¹| * |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)|) :
by rw [abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)), mul_assoc]
... ≤ ε * 1 : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left I (le_of_lt εpos)
... = ε : mul_one _ } },
calc dist p q = GH_dist p.rep (q.rep) : dist_GH_dist p q
... ≤ ε + ε/2 + ε : main
... = δ : by { simp [ε], ring }
end
/-- Compactness criterion: a closed set of compact metric spaces is compact if the spaces have
a uniformly bounded diameter, and for all `ε` the number of balls of radius `ε` required
to cover the spaces is uniformly bounded. This is an equivalence, but we only prove the
interesting direction that these conditions imply compactness. -/
lemma totally_bounded {t : set GH_space} {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → ℝ} {K : ℕ → ℕ}
(ulim : tendsto u at_top (𝓝 0))
(hdiam : ∀ p ∈ t, diam (univ : set (GH_space.rep p)) ≤ C)
(hcov : ∀ p ∈ t, ∀ n:ℕ, ∃ s : set (GH_space.rep p),
cardinal.mk s ≤ K n ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃x∈s, ball x (u n)) :
totally_bounded t :=
begin
/- Let `δ>0`, and `ε = δ/5`. For each `p`, we construct a finite subset `s p` of `p`, which
is `ε`-dense and has cardinality at most `K n`. Encoding the mutual distances of points in `s p`,
up to `ε`, we will get a map `F` associating to `p` finitely many data, and making it possible to
reconstruct `p` up to `ε`. This is enough to prove total boundedness. -/
refine metric.totally_bounded_of_finite_discretization (λ δ δpos, _),
let ε := (1/5) * δ,
have εpos : 0 < ε := mul_pos (by norm_num) δpos,
-- choose `n` for which `u n < ε`
rcases metric.tendsto_at_top.1 ulim ε εpos with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have u_le_ε : u n ≤ ε,
{ have := hn n le_rfl,
simp only [real.dist_eq, add_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_zero] at this,
exact le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _) this) },
-- construct a finite subset `s p` of `p` which is `ε`-dense and has cardinal `≤ K n`
have : ∀ p:GH_space, ∃ s : set p.rep, ∃ N ≤ K n, ∃ E : equiv s (fin N),
p ∈ t → univ ⊆ ⋃x∈s, ball x (u n),
{ assume p,
by_cases hp : p ∉ t,
{ have : nonempty (equiv (∅ : set p.rep) (fin 0)),
{ rw ← fintype.card_eq, simp },
use [∅, 0, bot_le, choice (this)] },
{ rcases hcov _ (set.not_not_mem.1 hp) n with ⟨s, ⟨scard, scover⟩⟩,
rcases cardinal.lt_aleph_0.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt scard (cardinal.nat_lt_aleph_0 _)) with ⟨N, hN⟩,
rw [hN, cardinal.nat_cast_le] at scard,
have : cardinal.mk s = cardinal.mk (fin N), by rw [hN, cardinal.mk_fin],
cases quotient.exact this with E,
use [s, N, scard, E],
simp [hp, scover] } },
choose s N hN E hs using this,
-- Define a function `F` taking values in a finite type and associating to `p` enough data
-- to reconstruct it up to `ε`, namely the (discretized) distances between elements of `s p`.
let M := ⌊ε⁻¹ * max C 0⌋₊,
let F : GH_space → (Σk:fin ((K n).succ), (fin k → fin k → fin (M.succ))) :=
λ p, ⟨⟨N p, lt_of_le_of_lt (hN p) (nat.lt_succ_self _)⟩,
λ a b, ⟨min M ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist ((E p).symm a) ((E p).symm b)⌋₊,
( min_le_left _ _).trans_lt (nat.lt_succ_self _) ⟩ ⟩,
refine ⟨_, _, (λ p, F p), _⟩, apply_instance,
-- It remains to show that if `F p = F q`, then `p` and `q` are `ε`-close
rintros ⟨p, pt⟩ ⟨q, qt⟩ hpq,
have Npq : N p = N q := fin.ext_iff.1 (sigma.mk.inj_iff.1 hpq).1,
let Ψ : s p → s q := λ x, (E q).symm (fin.cast Npq ((E p) x)),
let Φ : s p → q.rep := λ x, Ψ x,
have main : GH_dist p.rep (q.rep) ≤ ε + ε/2 + ε,
{ -- to prove the main inequality, argue that `s p` is `ε`-dense in `p`, and `s q` is `ε`-dense
-- in `q`, and `s p` and `s q` are almost isometric. Then closeness follows
-- from `GH_dist_le_of_approx_subsets`
refine GH_dist_le_of_approx_subsets Φ _ _ _,
show ∀ x : p.rep, ∃ (y : p.rep) (H : y ∈ s p), dist x y ≤ ε,
{ -- by construction, `s p` is `ε`-dense
assume x,
have : x ∈ ⋃y∈(s p), ball y (u n) := (hs p pt) (mem_univ _),
rcases mem_Union₂.1 this with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
exact ⟨y, ys, le_trans (le_of_lt hy) u_le_ε⟩ },
show ∀ x : q.rep, ∃ (z : s p), dist x (Φ z) ≤ ε,
{ -- by construction, `s q` is `ε`-dense, and it is the range of `Φ`
assume x,
have : x ∈ ⋃y∈(s q), ball y (u n) := (hs q qt) (mem_univ _),
rcases mem_Union₂.1 this with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
let i : ℕ := E q ⟨y, ys⟩,
let hi := ((E q) ⟨y, ys⟩).2,
have ihi_eq : (⟨i, hi⟩ : fin (N q)) = (E q) ⟨y, ys⟩, by rw [fin.ext_iff, fin.coe_mk],
have hiq : i < N q := hi,
have hip : i < N p, { rwa Npq.symm at hiq },
let z := (E p).symm ⟨i, hip⟩,
use z,
have C1 : (E p) z = ⟨i, hip⟩ := (E p).apply_symm_apply ⟨i, hip⟩,
have C2 : fin.cast Npq ⟨i, hip⟩ = ⟨i, hi⟩ := rfl,
have C3 : (E q).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ = ⟨y, ys⟩,
by { rw ihi_eq, exact (E q).symm_apply_apply ⟨y, ys⟩ },
have : Φ z = y :=
by { simp only [Φ, Ψ], rw [C1, C2, C3], refl },
rw this,
exact le_trans (le_of_lt hy) u_le_ε },
show ∀ x y : s p, |dist x y - dist (Φ x) (Φ y)| ≤ ε,
{ /- the distance between `x` and `y` is encoded in `F p`, and the distance between
`Φ x` and `Φ y` (two points of `s q`) is encoded in `F q`, all this up to `ε`.
As `F p = F q`, the distances are almost equal. -/
assume x y,
have : dist (Φ x) (Φ y) = dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y) := rfl,
rw this,
-- introduce `i`, that codes both `x` and `Φ x` in `fin (N p) = fin (N q)`
let i : ℕ := E p x,
have hip : i < N p := ((E p) x).2,
have hiq : i < N q, by rwa Npq at hip,
have i' : i = ((E q) (Ψ x)), by { simp [Ψ] },
-- introduce `j`, that codes both `y` and `Φ y` in `fin (N p) = fin (N q)`
let j : ℕ := E p y,
have hjp : j < N p := ((E p) y).2,
have hjq : j < N q, by rwa Npq at hjp,
have j' : j = ((E q) (Ψ y)), by { simp [Ψ] },
-- Express `dist x y` in terms of `F p`
have Ap : ((F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩).1 = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist x y⌋₊ := calc
((F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩).1 = ((F p).2 ((E p) x) ((E p) y)).1 :
by { congr; apply fin.ext_iff.2; refl }
... = min M ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist x y⌋₊ :
by simp only [F, (E p).symm_apply_apply]
... = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist x y⌋₊ :
begin
refine min_eq_right (nat.floor_mono _),
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)) ((inv_pos.2 εpos).le),
change dist (x : p.rep) y ≤ C,
refine le_trans (dist_le_diam_of_mem compact_univ.bounded (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)) _,
exact hdiam p pt
end,
-- Express `dist (Φ x) (Φ y)` in terms of `F q`
have Aq : ((F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩).1 = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)⌋₊ := calc
((F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩).1 = ((F q).2 ((E q) (Ψ x)) ((E q) (Ψ y))).1 :
by { congr; apply fin.ext_iff.2; [exact i', exact j'] }
... = min M ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)⌋₊ :
by simp only [F, (E q).symm_apply_apply]
... = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)⌋₊ :
begin
refine min_eq_right (nat.floor_mono _),
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)) ((inv_pos.2 εpos).le),
change dist (Ψ x : q.rep) (Ψ y) ≤ C,
refine le_trans (dist_le_diam_of_mem compact_univ.bounded (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)) _,
exact hdiam q qt
end,
-- use the equality between `F p` and `F q` to deduce that the distances have equal
-- integer parts
have : ((F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩).1 = ((F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩).1,
{ -- we want to `subst hpq` where `hpq : F p = F q`, except that `subst` only works
-- with a constant, so replace `F q` (and everything that depends on it) by a constant `f`
-- then `subst`
revert hiq hjq,
change N q with (F q).1,
generalize_hyp : F q = f at hpq ⊢,
subst hpq,
intros,
refl },
have : ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist x y⌋ = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)⌋,
{ rw [Ap, Aq] at this,
have D : 0 ≤ ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist x y⌋ :=
floor_nonneg.2 (mul_nonneg (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)) dist_nonneg),
have D' : 0 ≤ ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)⌋ :=
floor_nonneg.2 (mul_nonneg (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)) dist_nonneg),
rw [← int.to_nat_of_nonneg D, ← int.to_nat_of_nonneg D', int.floor_to_nat,int.floor_to_nat,
this] },
-- deduce that the distances coincide up to `ε`, by a straightforward computation
-- that should be automated
have I := calc
|ε⁻¹| * |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)| =
|ε⁻¹ * (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))| : (abs_mul _ _).symm
... = |(ε⁻¹ * dist x y) - (ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))| : by { congr, ring }
... ≤ 1 : le_of_lt (abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor this),
calc
|dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)| = (ε * ε⁻¹) * |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)| :
by rw [mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt εpos), one_mul]
... = ε * (|ε⁻¹| * |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)|) :
by rw [abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (inv_pos.2 εpos)), mul_assoc]
... ≤ ε * 1 : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left I (le_of_lt εpos)
... = ε : mul_one _ } },
calc dist p q = GH_dist p.rep (q.rep) : dist_GH_dist p q
... ≤ ε + ε/2 + ε : main
... = δ/2 : by { simp [ε], ring }
... < δ : half_lt_self δpos
end
section complete
/- We will show that a sequence `u n` of compact metric spaces satisfying
`dist (u n) (u (n+1)) < 1/2^n` converges, which implies completeness of the Gromov-Hausdorff space.
We need to exhibit the limiting compact metric space. For this, start from
a sequence `X n` of representatives of `u n`, and glue in an optimal way `X n` to `X (n+1)`
for all `n`, in a common metric space. Formally, this is done as follows.
Start from `Y 0 = X 0`. Then, glue `X 0` to `X 1` in an optimal way, yielding a space
`Y 1` (with an embedding of `X 1`). Then, consider an optimal gluing of `X 1` and `X 2`, and
glue it to `Y 1` along their common subspace `X 1`. This gives a new space `Y 2`, with an
embedding of `X 2`. Go on, to obtain a sequence of spaces `Y n`. Let `Z0` be the inductive
limit of the `Y n`, and finally let `Z` be the completion of `Z0`.
The images `X2 n` of `X n` in `Z` are at Hausdorff distance `< 1/2^n` by construction, hence they
form a Cauchy sequence for the Hausdorff distance. By completeness (of `Z`, and therefore of its
set of nonempty compact subsets), they converge to a limit `L`. This is the nonempty
compact metric space we are looking for. -/
variables (X : ℕ → Type) [∀ n, metric_space (X n)] [∀ n, compact_space (X n)] [∀ n, nonempty (X n)]
/-- Auxiliary structure used to glue metric spaces below, recording an isometric embedding
of a type `A` in another metric space. -/
structure aux_gluing_struct (A : Type) [metric_space A] : Type 1 :=
(space : Type)
(metric : metric_space space)
(embed : A → space)
(isom : isometry embed)
instance (A : Type) [metric_space A] : inhabited (aux_gluing_struct A) :=
⟨{ space := A,
metric := by apply_instance,
embed := id,
isom := λ x y, rfl }⟩
/-- Auxiliary sequence of metric spaces, containing copies of `X 0`, ..., `X n`, where each
`X i` is glued to `X (i+1)` in an optimal way. The space at step `n+1` is obtained from the space
at step `n` by adding `X (n+1)`, glued in an optimal way to the `X n` already sitting there. -/
def aux_gluing (n : ℕ) : aux_gluing_struct (X n) := nat.rec_on n
{ space := X 0,
metric := by apply_instance,
embed := id,
isom := λ x y, rfl }
(λ n Y, by letI : metric_space Y.space := Y.metric; exact
{ space := glue_space Y.isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X (n+1))),
metric := by apply_instance,
embed := (to_glue_r Y.isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X (n+1))))
∘ (optimal_GH_injr (X n) (X (n+1))),
isom := (to_glue_r_isometry _ _).comp (isometry_optimal_GH_injr (X n) (X (n+1))) })
/-- The Gromov-Hausdorff space is complete. -/
instance : complete_space GH_space :=
begin
have : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 < ((1:ℝ) / 2) ^ n, by { apply pow_pos, norm_num },
-- start from a sequence of nonempty compact metric spaces within distance `1/2^n` of each other
refine metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (λ n, (1/2)^n) this (λ u hu, _),
-- `X n` is a representative of `u n`
let X := λ n, (u n).rep,
-- glue them together successively in an optimal way, getting a sequence of metric spaces `Y n`
let Y := aux_gluing X,
letI : ∀ n, metric_space (Y n).space := λ n, (Y n).metric,
have E : ∀ n : ℕ,
glue_space (Y n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ)) = (Y n.succ).space :=
λ n, by { simp [Y, aux_gluing], refl },
let c := λ n, cast (E n),
have ic : ∀ n, isometry (c n) := λ n x y, rfl,
-- there is a canonical embedding of `Y n` in `Y (n+1)`, by construction
let f : Πn, (Y n).space → (Y n.succ).space :=
λ n, (c n) ∘ (to_glue_l (aux_gluing X n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))),
have I : ∀ n, isometry (f n),
{ assume n,
apply isometry.comp,
{ assume x y, refl },
{ apply to_glue_l_isometry } },
-- consider the inductive limit `Z0` of the `Y n`, and then its completion `Z`
let Z0 := metric.inductive_limit I,
let Z := uniform_space.completion Z0,
let Φ := to_inductive_limit I,
let coeZ := (coe : Z0 → Z),
-- let `X2 n` be the image of `X n` in the space `Z`
let X2 := λ n, range (coeZ ∘ (Φ n) ∘ (Y n).embed),
have isom : ∀ n, isometry (coeZ ∘ (Φ n) ∘ (Y n).embed),
{ assume n,
refine uniform_space.completion.coe_isometry.comp _,
exact (to_inductive_limit_isometry _ _).comp (Y n).isom },
-- The Hausdorff distance of `X2 n` and `X2 (n+1)` is by construction the distance between
-- `u n` and `u (n+1)`, therefore bounded by `1/2^n`
have D2 : ∀ n, Hausdorff_dist (X2 n) (X2 n.succ) < (1/2)^n,
{ assume n,
have X2n : X2 n = range ((coeZ ∘ (Φ n.succ) ∘ (c n)
∘ (to_glue_r (Y n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))))
∘ (optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))),
{ change X2 n = range (coeZ ∘ (Φ n.succ) ∘ (c n)
∘ (to_glue_r (Y n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ)))
∘ (optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))),
simp only [X2, Φ],
rw [← to_inductive_limit_commute I],
simp only [f],
rw ← to_glue_commute },
rw range_comp at X2n,
have X2nsucc : X2 n.succ = range ((coeZ ∘ (Φ n.succ) ∘ (c n)
∘ (to_glue_r (Y n).isom (isometry_optimal_GH_injl (X n) (X n.succ))))
∘ (optimal_GH_injr (X n) (X n.succ))), by refl,
rw range_comp at X2nsucc,
rw [X2n, X2nsucc, Hausdorff_dist_image, Hausdorff_dist_optimal, ← dist_GH_dist],
{ exact hu n n n.succ (le_refl n) (le_succ n) },
{ apply uniform_space.completion.coe_isometry.comp _,
exact (to_inductive_limit_isometry _ _).comp ((ic n).comp (to_glue_r_isometry _ _)) } },
-- consider `X2 n` as a member `X3 n` of the type of nonempty compact subsets of `Z`, which
-- is a metric space
let X3 : ℕ → nonempty_compacts Z := λ n,
⟨⟨X2 n, is_compact_range (isom n).continuous⟩, range_nonempty _⟩,
-- `X3 n` is a Cauchy sequence by construction, as the successive distances are
-- bounded by `(1/2)^n`
have : cauchy_seq X3,
{ refine cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric (1/2) 1 (by norm_num) (λ n, _),
rw one_mul,
exact le_of_lt (D2 n) },
-- therefore, it converges to a limit `L`
rcases cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete this with ⟨L, hL⟩,
-- the images of `X3 n` in the Gromov-Hausdorff space converge to the image of `L`
have M : tendsto (λ n, (X3 n).to_GH_space) at_top (𝓝 L.to_GH_space) :=
tendsto.comp (to_GH_space_continuous.tendsto _) hL,
-- By construction, the image of `X3 n` in the Gromov-Hausdorff space is `u n`.
have : ∀ n, (X3 n).to_GH_space = u n,
{ assume n,
rw [nonempty_compacts.to_GH_space, ← (u n).to_GH_space_rep,
to_GH_space_eq_to_GH_space_iff_isometric],
constructor,
convert (isom n).isometric_on_range.symm, },
-- Finally, we have proved the convergence of `u n`
exact ⟨L.to_GH_space, by simpa [this] using M⟩
end
end complete--section
end Gromov_Hausdorff --namespace
|
a5252c4f5efd8ab7fa1f777a213ab2e548421f8e | fe208a542cea7b2d6d7ff79f94d535f6d11d814a | /src/Logic/rohan_enrico_success.lean | 7bb3b372e92205ea9eec1f9579ff99d0d9b87e23 | [] | no_license | ImperialCollegeLondon/M1F_room_342_questions | c4b98b14113fe900a7f388762269305faff73e63 | 63de9a6ab9c27a433039dd5530bc9b10b1d227f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,807,312,561 | 1,545,232,972,000 | 1,545,232,972,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,816 | lean | --Rohan and Enrico
import data.set
namespace prop_logic
inductive fml
| atom (i : ℕ)
| imp (a b : fml)
| not (a : fml)
open fml
infixr ` →' `:50 := imp
local notation ` ¬' ` := fml.not
--CAN I MAKE THIS A FUNCTION INTO PROP INSTEAD OF TYPE????
inductive thm : fml → Prop
| axk (p q) : thm (p →' q →' p)
| axs (p q r) : thm $ (p →' q →' r) →' (p →' q) →' (p →' r)
| axn (p q) : thm $ (¬'q →' ¬'p) →' p →' q
| mp (p q) : thm p → thm (p →' q) → thm q
lemma p_of_p_of_p_of_p_of_p (p : fml) : thm ((p →' (p →' p)) →' (p →' p)) :=
thm.mp (p →' ((p →' p) →' p)) ((p →' (p →' p)) →' (p →' p)) (thm.axk p (p →' p)) (thm.axs p (p →' p) p)
lemma p_of_p (p : fml) : thm (p →' p) :=
thm.mp (p →' p →' p) (p →' p) (thm.axk p p) (p_of_p_of_p_of_p_of_p p)
lemma p_of_p' (p : fml) : thm (p →' p) :=
begin
have lemma1 := p_of_p_of_p_of_p_of_p p,
have lemma2 := thm.axk p p,
exact thm.mp _ _ lemma2 lemma1,
end
inductive consequence (G : set fml) : fml → Prop
| axk (p q) : consequence (p →' q →' p)
| axs (p q r) : consequence $ (p →' q →' r) →' (p →' q) →' (p →' r)
| axn (p q) : consequence $ (¬'q →' ¬'p) →' p →' q
| mp (p q) : consequence p → consequence (p →' q) → consequence q
| of_G (g ∈ G) : consequence g
lemma consequence_of_thm (f : fml) (H : thm f) (G : set fml) : consequence G f :=
begin
induction H,
exact consequence.axk G H_p H_q,
exact consequence.axs G H_p H_q H_r,
exact consequence.axn G H_p H_q,
exact consequence.mp H_p H_q H_ih_a H_ih_a_1,
end
lemma thm_of_consequence_null (f : fml) (H : consequence ∅ f) : thm f :=
begin
induction H,
exact thm.axk H_p H_q,
exact thm.axs H_p H_q H_r,
exact thm.axn H_p H_q,
exact thm.mp H_p H_q H_ih_a H_ih_a_1,
rw set.mem_empty_eq at H_H,
contradiction,
end
theorem deduction (G : set fml) (p q : fml) (H : consequence (G ∪ {p}) q) : consequence G (p →' q) :=
begin
induction H,
have H1 := consequence.axk G H_p H_q,
have H2 := consequence.axk G (H_p →' H_q →' H_p) p,
exact consequence.mp _ _ H1 H2,
have H6 := consequence.axs G H_p H_q H_r,
have H7 := consequence.axk G ((H_p →' H_q →' H_r) →' (H_p →' H_q) →' H_p →' H_r) p,
exact consequence.mp _ _ H6 H7,
have H8 := consequence.axn G H_p H_q,
have H9 := consequence.axk G ((¬' H_q →' ¬' H_p) →' H_p →' H_q) p,
exact consequence.mp _ _ H8 H9,
have H3 := consequence.axs G p H_p H_q,
have H4 := consequence.mp _ _ H_ih_a_1 H3,
exact consequence.mp _ _ H_ih_a H4,
rw set.mem_union at H_H,
cases H_H,
have H51 := consequence.of_G H_g H_H,
have H52 := consequence.axk G H_g p,
exact consequence.mp _ _ H51 H52,
rw set.mem_singleton_iff at H_H,
rw H_H,
exact consequence_of_thm _ (p_of_p p) G,
end
lemma part1 (p : fml) : consequence {¬' (¬' p)} p :=
begin
have H1 := consequence.axk {¬' (¬' p)} p p,
have H2 := consequence.axk {¬' (¬' p)} (¬' (¬' p)) (¬' (¬' (p →' p →' p))),
have H3 := consequence.of_G (¬' (¬' p))(set.mem_singleton (¬' (¬' p))),
have H4 := consequence.mp _ _ H3 H2,
have H5 := consequence.axn {¬' (¬' p)} (¬' p) (¬' (p →' p →' p)),
have H6 := consequence.mp _ _ H4 H5,
have H7 := consequence.axn {¬' (¬' p)} (p →' p →' p) p,
have H8 := consequence.mp _ _ H6 H7,
exact consequence.mp _ _ H1 H8,
end
lemma p_of_not_not_p (p : fml) : thm ((¬' (¬' p)) →' p) :=
begin
have H1 := deduction ∅ (¬' (¬' p)) p,
rw set.empty_union at H1,
have H2 := H1 (part1 p),
exact thm_of_consequence_null (¬' (¬' p) →' p) H2,
end
theorem not_not_p_of_p (p : fml) : thm (p →' (¬' (¬' p))) :=
begin
have H1 := thm.axn p (¬' (¬' p)),
have H2 := p_of_not_not_p (¬' p),
exact thm.mp _ _ H2 H1,
end
end prop_logic |
910d914c516a541c7df39bddfbe159f9523de3ac | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/ring_theory/witt_vector/compare.lean | e6e4ad3ef3fca9eb50cad385021c58b7a1244615 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,288 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import ring_theory.witt_vector.truncated
import ring_theory.witt_vector.identities
import number_theory.padics.ring_homs
/-!
# Comparison isomorphism between `witt_vector p (zmod p)` and `ℤ_[p]`
We construct a ring isomorphism between `witt_vector p (zmod p)` and `ℤ_[p]`.
This isomorphism follows from the fact that both satisfy the universal property
of the inverse limit of `zmod (p^n)`.
## Main declarations
* `witt_vector.to_zmod_pow`: a family of compatible ring homs `𝕎 (zmod p) → zmod (p^k)`
* `witt_vector.equiv`: the isomorphism
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
noncomputable theory
variables {p : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime]
local notation `𝕎` := witt_vector p
include hp
namespace truncated_witt_vector
variables (p) (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [comm_ring R]
lemma eq_of_le_of_cast_pow_eq_zero [char_p R p] (i : ℕ) (hin : i ≤ n)
(hpi : (p ^ i : truncated_witt_vector p n R) = 0) :
i = n :=
begin
contrapose! hpi,
replace hin := lt_of_le_of_ne hin hpi, clear hpi,
have : (↑p ^ i : truncated_witt_vector p n R) = witt_vector.truncate n (↑p ^ i),
{ rw [ring_hom.map_pow, map_nat_cast] },
rw [this, ext_iff, not_forall], clear this,
use ⟨i, hin⟩,
rw [witt_vector.coeff_truncate, coeff_zero, fin.coe_mk, witt_vector.coeff_p_pow],
haveI : nontrivial R := char_p.nontrivial_of_char_ne_one hp.1.ne_one,
exact one_ne_zero
end
section iso
variables (p n) {R}
lemma card_zmod : fintype.card (truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p)) = p ^ n :=
by rw [card, zmod.card]
lemma char_p_zmod : char_p (truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p)) (p ^ n) :=
char_p_of_prime_pow_injective _ _ _ (card_zmod _ _)
(eq_of_le_of_cast_pow_eq_zero p n (zmod p))
local attribute [instance] char_p_zmod
/--
The unique isomorphism between `zmod p^n` and `truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p)`.
This isomorphism exists, because `truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p)` is a finite ring
with characteristic and cardinality `p^n`.
-/
def zmod_equiv_trunc : zmod (p^n) ≃+* truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p) :=
zmod.ring_equiv (truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p)) (card_zmod _ _)
lemma zmod_equiv_trunc_apply {x : zmod (p^n)} :
zmod_equiv_trunc p n x = zmod.cast_hom (by refl) (truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p)) x :=
rfl
/--
The following diagram commutes:
```text
zmod (p^n) ----------------------------> zmod (p^m)
| |
| |
v v
truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p) ----> truncated_witt_vector p m (zmod p)
```
Here the vertical arrows are `truncated_witt_vector.zmod_equiv_trunc`,
the horizontal arrow at the top is `zmod.cast_hom`,
and the horizontal arrow at the bottom is `truncated_witt_vector.truncate`.
-/
lemma commutes {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) :
(truncate hm).comp (zmod_equiv_trunc p m).to_ring_hom =
(zmod_equiv_trunc p n).to_ring_hom.comp (zmod.cast_hom (pow_dvd_pow p hm) _) :=
ring_hom.ext_zmod _ _
lemma commutes' {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) (x : zmod (p^m)) :
truncate hm (zmod_equiv_trunc p m x) =
zmod_equiv_trunc p n (zmod.cast_hom (pow_dvd_pow p hm) _ x) :=
show (truncate hm).comp (zmod_equiv_trunc p m).to_ring_hom x = _,
by rw commutes _ _ hm; refl
lemma commutes_symm' {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) (x : truncated_witt_vector p m (zmod p)) :
(zmod_equiv_trunc p n).symm (truncate hm x) =
zmod.cast_hom (pow_dvd_pow p hm) _ ((zmod_equiv_trunc p m).symm x) :=
begin
apply (zmod_equiv_trunc p n).injective,
rw ← commutes',
simp
end
/--
The following diagram commutes:
```text
truncated_witt_vector p n (zmod p) ----> truncated_witt_vector p m (zmod p)
| |
| |
v v
zmod (p^n) ----------------------------> zmod (p^m)
```
Here the vertical arrows are `(truncated_witt_vector.zmod_equiv_trunc p _).symm`,
the horizontal arrow at the top is `zmod.cast_hom`,
and the horizontal arrow at the bottom is `truncated_witt_vector.truncate`.
-/
lemma commutes_symm {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) :
(zmod_equiv_trunc p n).symm.to_ring_hom.comp (truncate hm) =
(zmod.cast_hom (pow_dvd_pow p hm) _).comp (zmod_equiv_trunc p m).symm.to_ring_hom :=
by ext; apply commutes_symm'
end iso
end truncated_witt_vector
namespace witt_vector
open truncated_witt_vector
variables (p)
/--
`to_zmod_pow` is a family of compatible ring homs. We get this family by composing
`truncated_witt_vector.zmod_equiv_trunc` (in right-to-left direction)
with `witt_vector.truncate`.
-/
def to_zmod_pow (k : ℕ) : 𝕎 (zmod p) →+* zmod (p ^ k) :=
(zmod_equiv_trunc p k).symm.to_ring_hom.comp (truncate k)
lemma to_zmod_pow_compat (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) :
(zmod.cast_hom (pow_dvd_pow p h) (zmod (p ^ m))).comp (to_zmod_pow p n) = to_zmod_pow p m :=
calc (zmod.cast_hom _ (zmod (p ^ m))).comp
((zmod_equiv_trunc p n).symm.to_ring_hom.comp (truncate n)) =
((zmod_equiv_trunc p m).symm.to_ring_hom.comp
(truncated_witt_vector.truncate h)).comp (truncate n) :
by rw [commutes_symm, ring_hom.comp_assoc]
... = (zmod_equiv_trunc p m).symm.to_ring_hom.comp (truncate m) :
by rw [ring_hom.comp_assoc, truncate_comp_witt_vector_truncate]
/--
`to_padic_int` lifts `to_zmod_pow : 𝕎 (zmod p) →+* zmod (p ^ k)` to a ring hom to `ℤ_[p]`
using `padic_int.lift`, the universal property of `ℤ_[p]`.
-/
def to_padic_int : 𝕎 (zmod p) →+* ℤ_[p] := padic_int.lift $ to_zmod_pow_compat p
lemma zmod_equiv_trunc_compat (k₁ k₂ : ℕ) (hk : k₁ ≤ k₂) :
(truncated_witt_vector.truncate hk).comp
((zmod_equiv_trunc p k₂).to_ring_hom.comp
(padic_int.to_zmod_pow k₂)) =
(zmod_equiv_trunc p k₁).to_ring_hom.comp (padic_int.to_zmod_pow k₁) :=
by rw [← ring_hom.comp_assoc, commutes, ring_hom.comp_assoc, padic_int.zmod_cast_comp_to_zmod_pow]
/--
`from_padic_int` uses `witt_vector.lift` to lift `truncated_witt_vector.zmod_equiv_trunc`
composed with `padic_int.to_zmod_pow` to a ring hom `ℤ_[p] →+* 𝕎 (zmod p)`.
-/
def from_padic_int : ℤ_[p] →+* 𝕎 (zmod p) :=
witt_vector.lift (λ k, (zmod_equiv_trunc p k).to_ring_hom.comp (padic_int.to_zmod_pow k)) $
zmod_equiv_trunc_compat _
lemma to_padic_int_comp_from_padic_int :
(to_padic_int p).comp (from_padic_int p) = ring_hom.id ℤ_[p] :=
begin
rw ← padic_int.to_zmod_pow_eq_iff_ext,
intro n,
rw [← ring_hom.comp_assoc, to_padic_int, padic_int.lift_spec],
simp only [from_padic_int, to_zmod_pow, ring_hom.comp_id],
rw [ring_hom.comp_assoc, truncate_comp_lift, ← ring_hom.comp_assoc],
simp only [ring_equiv.symm_to_ring_hom_comp_to_ring_hom, ring_hom.id_comp]
end
lemma to_padic_int_comp_from_padic_int_ext (x) :
(to_padic_int p).comp (from_padic_int p) x = ring_hom.id ℤ_[p] x :=
by rw to_padic_int_comp_from_padic_int
lemma from_padic_int_comp_to_padic_int :
(from_padic_int p).comp (to_padic_int p) = ring_hom.id (𝕎 (zmod p)) :=
begin
apply witt_vector.hom_ext,
intro n,
rw [from_padic_int, ← ring_hom.comp_assoc, truncate_comp_lift, ring_hom.comp_assoc],
simp only [to_padic_int, to_zmod_pow, ring_hom.comp_id, padic_int.lift_spec, ring_hom.id_comp,
← ring_hom.comp_assoc, ring_equiv.to_ring_hom_comp_symm_to_ring_hom]
end
lemma from_padic_int_comp_to_padic_int_ext (x) :
(from_padic_int p).comp (to_padic_int p) x = ring_hom.id (𝕎 (zmod p)) x :=
by rw from_padic_int_comp_to_padic_int
/--
The ring of Witt vectors over `zmod p` is isomorphic to the ring of `p`-adic integers. This
equivalence is witnessed by `witt_vector.to_padic_int` with inverse `witt_vector.from_padic_int`.
-/
def equiv : 𝕎 (zmod p) ≃+* ℤ_[p] :=
{ to_fun := to_padic_int p,
inv_fun := from_padic_int p,
left_inv := from_padic_int_comp_to_padic_int_ext _,
right_inv := to_padic_int_comp_from_padic_int_ext _,
map_mul' := ring_hom.map_mul _,
map_add' := ring_hom.map_add _ }
end witt_vector
|
d152f7a3581a0b58dd3ede13dd9f003f7fa9fe65 | 08bd4ba4ca87dba1f09d2c96a26f5d65da81f4b4 | /src/Lean/Widget/InteractiveGoal.lean | aa6fabe948fbfdcc99c35ecb82644b8e9c047a9e | [
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"Apache-2.0",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | gebner/lean4 | d51c4922640a52a6f7426536ea669ef18a1d9af5 | 8cd9ce06843c9d42d6d6dc43d3e81e3b49dfc20f | refs/heads/master | 1,685,732,780,391 | 1,672,962,627,000 | 1,673,459,398,000 | 373,307,283 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,691,316,730,000 | 1,622,669,271,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,594 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wojciech Nawrocki
-/
import Lean.Meta.PPGoal
import Lean.Widget.InteractiveCode
import Lean.Data.Lsp.Extra
/-! RPC procedures for retrieving tactic and term goals with embedded `CodeWithInfos`. -/
namespace Lean.Widget
open Server
/-- In the infoview, if multiple hypotheses `h₁`, `h₂` have the same type `α`, they are rendered as `h₁ h₂ : α`.
We call this a 'hypothesis bundle'. -/
structure InteractiveHypothesisBundle where
/-- The user-friendly name for each hypothesis.
If anonymous then the name is inaccessible and hidden. -/
names : Array Name
/-- The ids for each variable. Should have the same length as `names`. -/
fvarIds : Array FVarId
type : CodeWithInfos
/-- The value, in the case the hypothesis is a `let`-binder. -/
val? : Option CodeWithInfos := none
/-- The hypothesis is a typeclass instance. -/
isInstance : Bool
/-- The hypothesis is a type. -/
isType : Bool
/-- If true, the hypothesis was not present on the previous tactic state.
Uses `none` instead of `some false` to save space in the json encoding. -/
isInserted? : Option Bool := none
/-- If true, the hypothesis will be removed in the next tactic state.
Uses `none` instead of `some false` to save space in the json encoding. -/
isRemoved? : Option Bool := none
deriving Inhabited, RpcEncodable
structure InteractiveGoal where
hyps : Array InteractiveHypothesisBundle
type : CodeWithInfos
userName? : Option String
goalPrefix : String
/-- Identifies the goal (ie with the unique
name of the MVar that it is a goal for.)
This is none when we are showing a term goal. -/
mvarId? : Option MVarId := none
/-- If true, the goal was not present on the previous tactic state.
Uses `none` instead of `some false` to save space in the json encoding. -/
isInserted?: Option Bool := none
/-- If true, the goal will be removed on the next tactic state.
Uses `none` instead of `some false` to save space in the json encoding. -/
isRemoved? : Option Bool := none
deriving Inhabited, RpcEncodable
namespace InteractiveGoal
private def addLine (fmt : Format) : Format :=
if fmt.isNil then fmt else fmt ++ Format.line
def pretty (g : InteractiveGoal) : Format := Id.run do
let indent := 2 -- Use option
let mut ret := match g.userName? with
| some userName => f!"case {userName}"
| none => Format.nil
for hyp in g.hyps do
ret := addLine ret
let names := hyp.names
|>.toList
|>.filter (not ∘ Name.isAnonymous)
|>.map toString
|> " ".intercalate
match names with
| "" =>
ret := ret ++ Format.group f!":{Format.nest indent (Format.line ++ hyp.type.stripTags)}"
| _ =>
match hyp.val? with
| some val =>
ret := ret ++ Format.group f!"{names} : {hyp.type.stripTags} :={Format.nest indent (Format.line ++ val.stripTags)}"
| none =>
ret := ret ++ Format.group f!"{names} :{Format.nest indent (Format.line ++ hyp.type.stripTags)}"
ret := addLine ret
ret ++ f!"{g.goalPrefix}{Format.nest indent g.type.stripTags}"
end InteractiveGoal
/-- This is everything needed to render an interactive term goal in the infoview. -/
structure InteractiveTermGoal where
hyps : Array InteractiveHypothesisBundle
type : CodeWithInfos
range : Lsp.Range
deriving Inhabited, RpcEncodable
namespace InteractiveTermGoal
def toInteractiveGoal (g : InteractiveTermGoal) : InteractiveGoal :=
{ g with userName? := none, goalPrefix := "⊢ " }
end InteractiveTermGoal
structure InteractiveGoals where
goals : Array InteractiveGoal
deriving RpcEncodable
def InteractiveGoals.append (l r : InteractiveGoals) : InteractiveGoals where
goals := l.goals ++ r.goals
instance : Append InteractiveGoals := ⟨InteractiveGoals.append⟩
instance : EmptyCollection InteractiveGoals := ⟨{goals := #[]}⟩
open Meta in
def addInteractiveHypothesisBundle (hyps : Array InteractiveHypothesisBundle) (ids : Array (Name × FVarId)) (type : Expr) (value? : Option Expr := none) : MetaM (Array InteractiveHypothesisBundle) := do
if ids.size == 0 then
throwError "Can only add a nonzero number of ids as an InteractiveHypothesisBundle."
let fvarIds := ids.map Prod.snd
let names := ids.map Prod.fst
return hyps.push {
names := names
fvarIds := fvarIds
type := (← ppExprTagged type)
val? := (← value?.mapM ppExprTagged)
isInstance := (← isClass? type).isSome
isType := (← instantiateMVars type).isSort
}
open Meta in
variable [MonadControlT MetaM n] [Monad n] [MonadError n] [MonadOptions n] [MonadMCtx n] in
def withGoalCtx (goal : MVarId) (action : LocalContext → MetavarDecl → n α) : n α := do
let mctx ← getMCtx
let some mvarDecl := mctx.findDecl? goal
| throwError "unknown goal {goal.name}"
let lctx := mvarDecl.lctx |>.sanitizeNames.run' {options := (← getOptions)}
withLCtx lctx mvarDecl.localInstances (action lctx mvarDecl)
open Meta in
/-- A variant of `Meta.ppGoal` which preserves subexpression information for interactivity. -/
def goalToInteractive (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM InteractiveGoal := do
let ppAuxDecls := pp.auxDecls.get (← getOptions)
let ppImplDetailHyps := pp.implementationDetailHyps.get (← getOptions)
let showLetValues := pp.showLetValues.get (← getOptions)
withGoalCtx mvarId fun lctx mvarDecl => do
let pushPending (ids : Array (Name × FVarId)) (type? : Option Expr) (hyps : Array InteractiveHypothesisBundle)
: MetaM (Array InteractiveHypothesisBundle) :=
if ids.isEmpty then
pure hyps
else
match type? with
| none => pure hyps
| some type => addInteractiveHypothesisBundle hyps ids type
let mut varNames : Array (Name × FVarId) := #[]
let mut prevType? : Option Expr := none
let mut hyps : Array InteractiveHypothesisBundle := #[]
for localDecl in lctx do
if !ppAuxDecls && localDecl.isAuxDecl || !ppImplDetailHyps && localDecl.isImplementationDetail then
continue
else
match localDecl with
| LocalDecl.cdecl _index fvarId varName type _ _ =>
let varName := varName.simpMacroScopes
let type ← instantiateMVars type
if prevType? == none || prevType? == some type then
varNames := varNames.push (varName, fvarId)
else
hyps ← pushPending varNames prevType? hyps
varNames := #[(varName, fvarId)]
prevType? := some type
| LocalDecl.ldecl _index fvarId varName type val _ _ => do
let varName := varName.simpMacroScopes
hyps ← pushPending varNames prevType? hyps
let type ← instantiateMVars type
let val? ← if showLetValues then pure (some (← instantiateMVars val)) else pure none
hyps ← addInteractiveHypothesisBundle hyps #[(varName, fvarId)] type val?
varNames := #[]
prevType? := none
hyps ← pushPending varNames prevType? hyps
let goalTp ← instantiateMVars mvarDecl.type
let goalFmt ← ppExprTagged goalTp
let userName? := match mvarDecl.userName with
| Name.anonymous => none
| name => some <| toString name.eraseMacroScopes
return {
hyps,
type := goalFmt,
userName?,
goalPrefix := getGoalPrefix mvarDecl,
mvarId? := some mvarId
}
end Lean.Widget
|
78fb7877befd298599a8af5b1355f934afc03aab | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Compiler/Specialize.lean | b026c9eb67136c3136e98868978e02284d699408 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,479 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Attributes
import Init.Lean.Compiler.Util
namespace Lean
namespace Compiler
inductive SpecializeAttributeKind
| specialize | nospecialize
namespace SpecializeAttributeKind
instance : Inhabited SpecializeAttributeKind := ⟨SpecializeAttributeKind.specialize⟩
protected def beq : SpecializeAttributeKind → SpecializeAttributeKind → Bool
| specialize, specialize => true
| nospecialize, nospecialize => true
| _, _ => false
instance : HasBeq SpecializeAttributeKind := ⟨SpecializeAttributeKind.beq⟩
end SpecializeAttributeKind
def mkSpecializeAttrs : IO (EnumAttributes SpecializeAttributeKind) :=
registerEnumAttributes `specializeAttrs
[(`specialize, "mark definition to always be inlined", SpecializeAttributeKind.specialize),
(`nospecialize, "mark definition to never be inlined", SpecializeAttributeKind.nospecialize) ]
/- TODO: fix the following hack.
We need to use the following hack because the equation compiler generates auxiliary
definitions that are compiled before we even finish the elaboration of the current command.
So, if the current command is a `@[specialize] def foo ...`, we must set the attribute `[specialize]`
before we start elaboration, otherwise when we compile the auxiliary definitions we will not be
able to test whether `@[specialize]` has been set or not.
In the new equation compiler we should pass all attributes and allow it to apply them to auxiliary definitions.
In the current implementation, we workaround this issue by using functions such as `hasSpecializeAttrAux`.
-/
(fun env declName _ => Except.ok ())
AttributeApplicationTime.beforeElaboration
@[init mkSpecializeAttrs]
constant specializeAttrs : EnumAttributes SpecializeAttributeKind := arbitrary _
private partial def hasSpecializeAttrAux (env : Environment) (kind : SpecializeAttributeKind) : Name → Bool
| n => match specializeAttrs.getValue env n with
| some k => kind == k
| none => if n.isInternal then hasSpecializeAttrAux n.getPrefix else false
@[export lean_has_specialize_attribute]
def hasSpecializeAttribute (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Bool :=
hasSpecializeAttrAux env SpecializeAttributeKind.specialize n
@[export lean_has_nospecialize_attribute]
def hasNospecializeAttribute (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Bool :=
hasSpecializeAttrAux env SpecializeAttributeKind.nospecialize n
inductive SpecArgKind
| fixed
| fixedNeutral -- computationally neutral
| fixedHO -- higher order
| fixedInst -- type class instance
| other
structure SpecInfo :=
(mutualDecls : List Name) (argKinds : SpecArgKind)
structure SpecState :=
(specInfo : SMap Name SpecInfo := {})
(cache : SMap Expr Name := {})
inductive SpecEntry
| info (name : Name) (info : SpecInfo)
| cache (key : Expr) (fn : Name)
namespace SpecState
instance : Inhabited SpecState := ⟨{}⟩
def addEntry (s : SpecState) (e : SpecEntry) : SpecState :=
match e with
| SpecEntry.info name info => { specInfo := s.specInfo.insert name info, .. s }
| SpecEntry.cache key fn => { cache := s.cache.insert key fn, .. s }
def switch : SpecState → SpecState
| ⟨m₁, m₂⟩ => ⟨m₁.switch, m₂.switch⟩
end SpecState
def mkSpecExtension : IO (SimplePersistentEnvExtension SpecEntry SpecState) :=
registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
name := `specialize,
addEntryFn := SpecState.addEntry,
addImportedFn := fun es => (mkStateFromImportedEntries SpecState.addEntry {} es).switch
}
@[init mkSpecExtension]
constant specExtension : SimplePersistentEnvExtension SpecEntry SpecState := arbitrary _
@[export lean_add_specialization_info]
def addSpecializationInfo (env : Environment) (fn : Name) (info : SpecInfo) : Environment :=
specExtension.addEntry env (SpecEntry.info fn info)
@[export lean_get_specialization_info]
def getSpecializationInfo (env : Environment) (fn : Name) : Option SpecInfo :=
(specExtension.getState env).specInfo.find? fn
@[export lean_cache_specialization]
def cacheSpecialization (env : Environment) (e : Expr) (fn : Name) : Environment :=
specExtension.addEntry env (SpecEntry.cache e fn)
@[export lean_get_cached_specialization]
def getCachedSpecialization (env : Environment) (e : Expr) : Option Name :=
(specExtension.getState env).cache.find? e
end Compiler
end Lean
|
39cb09e9e3a113730795dc1e244f4ac8fe78bba2 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/data/rel.lean | 83caaf8936308400aa285588adddfdbe9e1b7e70 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,423 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
Operations on set-valued functions, aka partial multifunctions, aka relations.
-/
import data.set.lattice
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction --/
@[derive complete_lattice, derive inhabited]
def rel (α : Type*) (β : Type*) := α → β → Prop
namespace rel
variables {δ : Type*} (r : rel α β)
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : rel β α := flip r
lemma inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y := iff.rfl
lemma inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by { ext x y, reflexivity }
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := {x | ∃ y, r x y}
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation-/
def codom := {y | ∃ x, r x y}
lemma codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by { ext x y, reflexivity }
lemma dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by { ext x y, reflexivity}
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `category_theory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) : rel α γ :=
λ x z, ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
local infixr ` ∘ ` :=rel.comp
lemma comp_assoc (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) (t : rel γ δ) :
(r ∘ s) ∘ t = r ∘ s ∘ t :=
begin
unfold comp, ext x w, split,
{ rintros ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩, exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩ },
rintros ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩, exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
end
@[simp]
lemma comp_right_id (r : rel α β) : r ∘ @eq β = r :=
by { unfold comp, ext y, simp }
@[simp]
lemma comp_left_id (r : rel α β) : @eq α ∘ r = r :=
by { unfold comp, ext x, simp }
lemma inv_id : inv (@eq α) = @eq α :=
by { ext x y, split; apply eq.symm }
lemma inv_comp (r : rel α β) (s : rel β γ) : inv (r ∘ s) = inv s ∘ inv r :=
by { ext x z, simp [comp, inv, flip, and.comm] }
/-- Image of a set under a relation -/
def image (s : set α) : set β := {y | ∃ x ∈ s, r x y}
lemma mem_image (y : β) (s : set α) : y ∈ image r s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, r x y :=
iff.rfl
lemma image_subset : ((⊆) ⇒ (⊆)) r.image r.image :=
assume s t h y ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩, ⟨x, h xs, rxy⟩
lemma image_mono : monotone r.image := r.image_subset
lemma image_inter (s t : set α) : r.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.image s ∩ r.image t :=
r.image_mono.map_inf_le s t
lemma image_union (s t : set α) : r.image (s ∪ t) = r.image s ∪ r.image t :=
le_antisymm
(λ y ⟨x, xst, rxy⟩, xst.elim (λ xs, or.inl ⟨x, ⟨xs, rxy⟩⟩) (λ xt, or.inr ⟨x, ⟨xt, rxy⟩⟩))
(r.image_mono.le_map_sup s t)
@[simp]
lemma image_id (s : set α) : image (@eq α) s = s :=
by { ext x, simp [mem_image] }
lemma image_comp (s : rel β γ) (t : set α) : image (r ∘ s) t = image s (image r t) :=
begin
ext z, simp only [mem_image, comp], split,
{ rintros ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩, exact ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩ },
rintros ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩, exact ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩
end
lemma image_univ : r.image set.univ = r.codom := by { ext y, simp [mem_image, codom] }
/-- Preimage of a set under a relation `r`. Same as the image of `s` under `r.inv` -/
def preimage (s : set β) : set α := image (inv r) s
lemma mem_preimage (x : α) (s : set β) : x ∈ preimage r s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, r x y :=
iff.rfl
lemma preimage_def (s : set β) : preimage r s = {x | ∃ y ∈ s, r x y} :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_preimage _ _ _
lemma preimage_mono {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : r.preimage s ⊆ r.preimage t :=
image_mono _ h
lemma preimage_inter (s t : set β) : r.preimage (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.preimage s ∩ r.preimage t :=
image_inter _ s t
lemma preimage_union (s t : set β) : r.preimage (s ∪ t) = r.preimage s ∪ r.preimage t :=
image_union _ s t
lemma preimage_id (s : set α) : preimage (@eq α) s = s :=
by simp only [preimage, inv_id, image_id]
lemma preimage_comp (s : rel β γ) (t : set γ) :
preimage (r ∘ s) t = preimage r (preimage s t) :=
by simp only [preimage, inv_comp, image_comp]
lemma preimage_univ : r.preimage set.univ = r.dom :=
by { rw [preimage, image_univ, codom_inv] }
/-- Core of a set `s : set β` w.r.t `r : rel α β` is the set of `x : α` that are related *only*
to elements of `s`. -/
def core (s : set β) := {x | ∀ y, r x y → y ∈ s}
lemma mem_core (x : α) (s : set β) : x ∈ core r s ↔ ∀ y, r x y → y ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
lemma core_subset : ((⊆) ⇒ (⊆)) r.core r.core :=
assume s t h x h' y rxy, h (h' y rxy)
lemma core_mono : monotone r.core := r.core_subset
lemma core_inter (s t : set β) : r.core (s ∩ t) = r.core s ∩ r.core t :=
set.ext (by simp [mem_core, imp_and_distrib, forall_and_distrib])
lemma core_union (s t : set β) : r.core s ∪ r.core t ⊆ r.core (s ∪ t) :=
r.core_mono.le_map_sup s t
lemma core_univ : r.core set.univ = set.univ := set.ext (by simp [mem_core])
lemma core_id (s : set α) : core (@eq α) s = s :=
by simp [core]
lemma core_comp (s : rel β γ) (t : set γ) :
core (r ∘ s) t = core r (core s t) :=
begin
ext x, simp [core, comp], split,
{ intros h y rxy z syz, exact h z y rxy syz },
intros h z y rzy syz, exact h y rzy z syz
end
/-- Restrict the domain of a relation to a subtype. -/
def restrict_domain (s : set α) : rel {x // x ∈ s} β :=
λ x y, r x.val y
theorem image_subset_iff (s : set α) (t : set β) : image r s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ core r t :=
iff.intro
(λ h x xs y rxy, h ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩)
(λ h y ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩, h xs y rxy)
theorem core_preimage_gc : galois_connection (image r) (core r) :=
image_subset_iff _
end rel
namespace function
/-- The graph of a function as a relation. -/
def graph (f : α → β) : rel α β := λ x y, f x = y
end function
namespace set
-- TODO: if image were defined with bounded quantification in corelib, the next two would
-- be definitional
lemma image_eq (f : α → β) (s : set α) : f '' s = (function.graph f).image s :=
by simp [set.image, function.graph, rel.image]
lemma preimage_eq (f : α → β) (s : set β) :
f ⁻¹' s = (function.graph f).preimage s :=
by simp [set.preimage, function.graph, rel.preimage, rel.inv, flip, rel.image]
lemma preimage_eq_core (f : α → β) (s : set β) :
f ⁻¹' s = (function.graph f).core s :=
by simp [set.preimage, function.graph, rel.core]
end set
|
2f0a7d8d9dd61f9568fe18f17bade88acbaced63 | 78269ad0b3c342b20786f60690708b6e328132b0 | /src/library_dev/data/list/basic.lean | ba9fadd5c76ee80bb83a102b4d9212f45d232339 | [] | no_license | dselsam/library_dev | e74f46010fee9c7b66eaa704654cad0fcd2eefca | 1b4e34e7fb067ea5211714d6d3ecef5132fc8218 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,372,841,675 | 1,497,014,421,000 | 1,497,014,421,000 | 86,526,137 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,490,752,133,000 | 1,490,752,132,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,590 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn
Basic properties of lists.
-/
import library_dev.logic.basic ..nat.basic
open function nat
namespace list
universe variable uu
variable {α : Type uu}
/- theorems -/
@[simp]
lemma cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [] :=
begin intro, contradiction end
lemma head_eq_of_cons_eq {α : Type} {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
lemma tail_eq_of_cons_eq {α : Type} {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
lemma cons_inj {α : Type} {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
take l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
/- append -/
-- TODO(Jeremy): append_nil in the lean library should be nil_append
attribute [simp] cons_append nil_append
@[simp]
theorem append.assoc (s t u : list α) : s ++ t ++ u = s ++ (t ++ u) :=
begin induction s with a s ih, reflexivity, simp [ih] end
/- length -/
attribute [simp] length_cons
attribute [simp] length_append
/- concat -/
@[simp]
theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a::l) b = a::(concat l b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
begin induction l, repeat { intro h, contradiction } end
attribute [simp] length_concat
@[simp]
theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
begin induction l₁ with b l₁ ih, simp, simp [ih] end
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
begin induction l₂ with b l₂ ih, repeat { simp } end
/- last -/
@[simp]
lemma last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
/- head and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head_cons [h : inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l :=
rfl
/- list membership -/
attribute [simp] mem_nil_iff mem_cons_self mem_cons_iff
/- index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp]
theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 :=
rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem index_of_cons_of_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp]
theorem index_of_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
@[simp]
theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : ¬a ∈ l → index_of a l = length l :=
list.rec_on l
(suppose ¬a ∈ [], rfl)
(take b l,
assume ih : ¬a ∈ l → index_of a l = length l,
suppose ¬a ∈ b::l,
have ¬a = b ∧ ¬a ∈ l, begin rw [mem_cons_iff, not_or_iff] at this, exact this end,
show index_of a (b::l) = length (b::l),
begin rw [index_of_cons, if_neg this^.left, ih this^.right], reflexivity end)
lemma index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
list.rec_on l
(by simp)
(take b l, assume ih : index_of a l ≤ length l,
show index_of a (b::l) ≤ length (b::l), from
decidable.by_cases
(suppose a = b, begin simp [this, index_of_cons_of_eq l (eq.refl b)], apply zero_le end)
(suppose a ≠ b, begin rw [index_of_cons_of_ne l this], apply succ_le_succ ih end))
lemma not_mem_of_index_of_eq_length : ∀ {a : α} {l : list α}, index_of a l = length l → a ∉ l
| a [] := by simp
| a (b::l) :=
begin
note h := decidable.em (a = b),
cases h with aeqb aneb,
{ rw [index_of_cons_of_eq l aeqb, length_cons], intros, contradiction },
rw [index_of_cons_of_ne l aneb, length_cons, mem_cons_iff, not_or_iff],
intro h, split, assumption,
exact not_mem_of_index_of_eq_length (nat.succ_inj h)
end
lemma index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} (al : a ∈ l) : index_of a l < length l :=
begin
apply lt_of_le_of_ne,
apply index_of_le_length,
apply not.intro, intro Peq,
exact absurd al (not_mem_of_index_of_eq_length Peq)
end
end index_of
/- nth element -/
section nth
attribute [simp] nth_succ
theorem nth_eq_some : ∀ {l : list α} {n : nat}, n < length l → { a : α // nth l n = some a}
| ([] : list α) n h := absurd h (not_lt_zero _)
| (a::l) 0 h := ⟨a, rfl⟩
| (a::l) (succ n) h :=
have n < length l, from lt_of_succ_lt_succ h,
subtype.rec_on (nth_eq_some this)
(take b : α, take hb : nth l n = some b,
show { b : α // nth (a::l) (succ n) = some b },
from ⟨b, by rw [nth_succ, hb]⟩)
theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → nth l (index_of a l) = some a
| [] ain := absurd ain (not_mem_nil _)
| (b::l) ainbl := decidable.by_cases
(λ aeqb : a = b, by rw [index_of_cons_of_eq _ aeqb]; simp [nth, aeqb])
(λ aneb : a ≠ b, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(λ aeqb : a = b, absurd aeqb aneb)
(λ ainl : a ∈ l, by rewrite [index_of_cons_of_ne _ aneb, nth_succ, index_of_nth ainl]))
definition inth [h : inhabited α] (l : list α) (n : nat) : α :=
match (nth l n) with
| (some a) := a
| none := arbitrary α
end
theorem inth_zero [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : inth (a :: l) 0 = a :=
rfl
theorem inth_succ [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) (n : nat) : inth (a::l) (n+1) = inth l n :=
rfl
end nth
section ith
definition ith : Π (l : list α) (i : nat), i < length l → α
| nil i h := absurd h (not_lt_zero i)
| (a::ains) 0 h := a
| (a::ains) (succ i) h := ith ains i (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
@[simp]
lemma ith_zero (a : α) (l : list α) (h : 0 < length (a::l)) : ith (a::l) 0 h = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma ith_succ (a : α) (l : list α) (i : nat) (h : succ i < length (a::l))
: ith (a::l) (succ i) h = ith l i (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) :=
rfl
end ith
section taken
@[simp]
lemma taken_zero : ∀ (l : list α), taken 0 l = [] :=
begin intros, reflexivity end
@[simp]
lemma taken_nil : ∀ n, taken n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
lemma taken_cons : ∀ n (a : α) (l : list α), taken (succ n) (a::l) = a :: taken n l :=
begin intros, reflexivity end
lemma taken_all : ∀ (l : list α), taken (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (taken (length l) l) = a :: l, rw taken_all end
lemma taken_all_of_ge : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, n ≥ length l → taken n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: taken n l = a :: l,
rw [taken_all_of_ge (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
-- TODO(Jeremy): restore when we have min
/-
lemma taken_taken : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), taken n (taken m l) = taken (min n m) l
| n 0 l := sorry -- by rewrite [min_zero, taken_zero, taken_nil]
| 0 m l := sorry -- by rewrite [zero_min]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := sorry -- by rewrite [*taken_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := sorry -- by rewrite [*taken_cons, taken_taken, min_succ_succ]
-/
lemma length_taken_le : ∀ (n) (l : list α), length (taken n l) ≤ n
| 0 l := begin rw [taken_zero], reflexivity end
| (succ n) (a::l) := begin
rw [taken_cons, length_cons], apply succ_le_succ,
apply length_taken_le
end
| (succ n) [] := begin simp [taken, length], apply zero_le end
-- TODO(Jeremy): restore when we have min
/-
lemma length_taken_eq : ∀ (n) (l : list α), length (taken n l) = min n (length l)
| 0 l := sorry -- by rewrite [taken_zero, zero_min]
| (succ n) (a::l) := sorry -- by rewrite [taken_cons, *length_cons, *add_one, min_succ_succ,
length_taken_eq]
| (succ n) [] := sorry -- by rewrite [taken_nil]
-/
end taken
-- TODO(Jeremy): restore when we have nat.sub
/-
section dropn
-- 'dropn n l' drops the first 'n' elements of 'l'
theorem length_dropn
: ∀ (i : ℕ) (l : list α), length (dropn i l) = length l - i
| 0 l := rfl
| (succ i) [] := calc
length (dropn (succ i) []) = 0 - succ i : sorry -- by rewrite (nat.zero_sub (succ i))
| (succ i) (x::l) := calc
length (dropn (succ i) (x::l))
= length (dropn i l) : by reflexivity
... = length l - i : length_dropn i l
... = succ (length l) - succ i : sorry -- by rewrite (succ_sub_succ (length l) i)
end dropn
-/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
definition count (a : α) : list α → nat
| [] := 0
| (x::xs) := if a = x then succ (count xs) else count xs
@[simp]
lemma count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 :=
rfl
lemma count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l :=
rfl
lemma count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
decidable.by_cases
(suppose a = b, begin rw [count_cons, if_pos this, if_pos this] end)
(suppose a ≠ b, begin rw [count_cons, if_neg this, if_neg this], reflexivity end)
@[simp]
lemma count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp]
lemma count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
lemma count_cons_ge_count (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a (b :: l) ≥ count a l :=
decidable.by_cases
(suppose a = b, begin subst b, rewrite count_cons_self, apply le_succ end)
(suppose a ≠ b, begin rw (count_cons_of_ne this), apply le_refl end)
-- TODO(Jeremy): without the reflexivity, this yields the goal "1 = 1". the first is from has_one,
-- the second is succ 0. Make sure the simplifier can eventually handle this.
lemma count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 :=
by simp
@[simp]
lemma count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂
| [] l₂ := begin rw [nil_append, count_nil, zero_add] end
| (b::l₁) l₂ := decidable.by_cases
(suppose a = b, by rw [-this, cons_append, count_cons_self, count_cons_self, succ_add,
count_append])
(suppose a ≠ b, by rw [cons_append, count_cons_of_ne this, count_cons_of_ne this, count_append])
@[simp]
lemma count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, count_append, count_singleton]
lemma mem_of_count_pos : ∀ {a : α} {l : list α}, count a l > 0 → a ∈ l
| a [] h := absurd h (lt_irrefl _)
| a (b::l) h := decidable.by_cases
(suppose a = b, begin subst b, apply mem_cons_self end)
(suppose a ≠ b,
have count a l > 0, begin rw [count_cons_of_ne this] at h, exact h end,
have a ∈ l, from mem_of_count_pos this,
show a ∈ b::l, from mem_cons_of_mem _ this)
lemma count_pos_of_mem : ∀ {a : α} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → count a l > 0
| a [] h := absurd h (not_mem_nil _)
| a (b::l) h := or.elim h
(suppose a = b, begin subst b, rw count_cons_self, apply zero_lt_succ end)
(suppose a ∈ l, calc
count a (b::l) ≥ count a l : count_cons_ge_count _ _ _
... > 0 : count_pos_of_mem this)
lemma mem_iff_count_pos (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ l ↔ count a l > 0 :=
iff.intro count_pos_of_mem mem_of_count_pos
@[simp]
lemma count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
have ∀ n, count a l = n → count a l = 0,
begin
intro n, cases n,
{ intro this, exact this },
intro this, exact absurd (mem_of_count_pos (begin rw this, exact dec_trivial end)) h
end,
this (count a l) rfl
lemma not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
suppose a ∈ l,
have count a l > 0, from count_pos_of_mem this,
show false, begin rw h at this, exact nat.not_lt_zero _ this end
end count
end list
|
96cd4f9ca06ee809176ef84e98286722c66fd345 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/number_theory/liouville/measure.lean | 1b8f44c5241fc6d49d84f2e62eb760e749bd5470 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,169 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue
import number_theory.liouville.residual
import number_theory.liouville.liouville_with
import analysis.p_series
/-!
# Volume of the set of Liouville numbers
In this file we prove that the set of Liouville numbers with exponent (irrationality measure)
strictly greater than two is a set of Lebesuge measure zero, see
`volume_Union_set_of_liouville_with`.
Since this set is a residual set, we show that the filters `residual` and `volume.ae` are disjoint.
These filters correspond to two common notions of genericity on `ℝ`: residual sets and sets of full
measure. The fact that the filters are disjoint means that two mutually exclusive properties can be
“generic” at the same time (in the sense of different “genericity” filters).
## Tags
Liouville number, Lebesgue measure, residual, generic property
-/
open_locale filter big_operators ennreal topological_space nnreal
open filter set metric measure_theory real
lemma set_of_liouville_with_subset_aux :
{x : ℝ | ∃ p > 2, liouville_with p x} ⊆
⋃ m : ℤ, (λ x : ℝ, x + m) ⁻¹' (⋃ n > (0 : ℕ),
{x : ℝ | ∃ᶠ b : ℕ in at_top, ∃ a ∈ finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b,
|x - (a : ℤ) / b| < 1 / b ^ (2 + 1 / n : ℝ)}) :=
begin
rintro x ⟨p, hp, hxp⟩,
rcases exists_nat_one_div_lt (sub_pos.2 hp) with ⟨n, hn⟩,
rw lt_sub_iff_add_lt' at hn,
suffices : ∀ y : ℝ, liouville_with p y → y ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 →
∃ᶠ b : ℕ in at_top, ∃ a ∈ finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b, |y - a / b| < 1 / b ^ (2 + 1 / (n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ),
{ simp only [mem_Union, mem_preimage],
have hx : x + ↑(-⌊x⌋) ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1,
{ simp only [int.floor_le, int.lt_floor_add_one, add_neg_lt_iff_le_add', zero_add, and_self,
mem_Ico, int.cast_neg, le_add_neg_iff_add_le] },
refine ⟨-⌊x⌋, n + 1, n.succ_pos, this _ (hxp.add_int _) hx⟩ },
clear hxp x, intros x hxp hx01,
refine ((hxp.frequently_lt_rpow_neg hn).and_eventually (eventually_ge_at_top 1)).mono _,
rintro b ⟨⟨a, hne, hlt⟩, hb⟩,
rw [rpow_neg b.cast_nonneg, ← one_div, ← nat.cast_succ] at hlt,
refine ⟨a, _, hlt⟩,
replace hb : (1 : ℝ) ≤ b, from nat.one_le_cast.2 hb,
have hb0 : (0 : ℝ) < b := zero_lt_one.trans_le hb,
replace hlt : |x - a / b| < 1 / b,
{ refine hlt.trans_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_le hb0 _),
calc (b : ℝ) = b ^ (1 : ℝ) : (rpow_one _).symm
... ≤ b ^ (2 + 1 / (n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) : rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hb (one_le_two.trans _),
simpa using n.cast_add_one_pos.le },
rw [sub_div' _ _ _ hb0.ne', abs_div, abs_of_pos hb0, div_lt_div_right hb0,
abs_sub_lt_iff, sub_lt_iff_lt_add, sub_lt_iff_lt_add, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add'] at hlt,
rw [finset.mem_Icc, ← int.lt_add_one_iff, ← int.lt_add_one_iff, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add, add_comm,
← @int.cast_lt ℝ, ← @int.cast_lt ℝ], push_cast,
refine ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt _ hlt.1, hlt.2.trans_le _⟩,
{ simp only [mul_nonneg hx01.left b.cast_nonneg, neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, le_add_iff_nonneg_left] },
{ rw [add_le_add_iff_left],
calc x * b ≤ 1 * b : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hx01.2.le hb0.le
... = b : one_mul b }
end
/-- The set of numbers satisfying the Liouville condition with some exponent `p > 2` has Lebesgue
measure zero. -/
@[simp] lemma volume_Union_set_of_liouville_with :
volume (⋃ (p : ℝ) (hp : 2 < p), {x : ℝ | liouville_with p x}) = 0 :=
begin
simp only [← set_of_exists],
refine measure_mono_null set_of_liouville_with_subset_aux _,
rw measure_Union_null_iff, intro m, rw measure_preimage_add_right, clear m,
refine (measure_bUnion_null_iff $ to_countable _).2 (λ n (hn : 1 ≤ n), _),
generalize hr : (2 + 1 / n : ℝ) = r,
replace hr : 2 < r, by simp [← hr, zero_lt_one.trans_le hn], clear hn n,
refine measure_set_of_frequently_eq_zero _,
simp only [set_of_exists, ← real.dist_eq, ← mem_ball, set_of_mem_eq],
set B : ℤ → ℕ → set ℝ := λ a b, ball (a / b) (1 / b ^ r),
have hB : ∀ a b, volume (B a b) = ↑(2 / b ^ r : ℝ≥0),
{ intros a b,
rw [real.volume_ball, mul_one_div, ← nnreal.coe_two, ← nnreal.coe_nat_cast, ← nnreal.coe_rpow,
← nnreal.coe_div, ennreal.of_real_coe_nnreal] },
have : ∀ b : ℕ, volume (⋃ a ∈ finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b, B a b) ≤ (2 * (b ^ (1 - r) + b ^ (-r)) : ℝ≥0),
{ intro b,
calc volume (⋃ a ∈ finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b, B a b)
≤ ∑ a in finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b, volume (B a b) : measure_bUnion_finset_le _ _
... = ((b + 1) * (2 / b ^ r) : ℝ≥0) :
by simp only [hB, int.card_Icc, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, sub_zero,
← int.coe_nat_succ, int.to_nat_coe_nat, ← nat.cast_succ, ennreal.coe_mul, ennreal.coe_nat]
... = _ : _,
have : 1 - r ≠ 0, by linarith,
rw [ennreal.coe_eq_coe],
simp [add_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, nnreal.rpow_neg, nnreal.rpow_sub' _ this, mul_add,
mul_left_comm] },
refine ne_top_of_le_ne_top (ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.2 _)
(ennreal.tsum_le_tsum this),
refine (summable.add _ _).mul_left _; simp only [nnreal.summable_rpow]; linarith
end
lemma ae_not_liouville_with : ∀ᵐ x, ∀ p > (2 : ℝ), ¬liouville_with p x :=
by simpa only [ae_iff, not_forall, not_not, set_of_exists]
using volume_Union_set_of_liouville_with
lemma ae_not_liouville : ∀ᵐ x, ¬liouville x :=
ae_not_liouville_with.mono $ λ x h₁ h₂, h₁ 3 (by norm_num) (h₂.liouville_with 3)
/-- The set of Liouville numbers has Lebesgue measure zero. -/
@[simp] lemma volume_set_of_liouville : volume {x : ℝ | liouville x} = 0 :=
by simpa only [ae_iff, not_not] using ae_not_liouville
/-- The filters `residual ℝ` and `volume.ae` are disjoint. This means that there exists a residual
set of Lebesgue measure zero (e.g., the set of Liouville numbers). -/
lemma real.disjoint_residual_ae : disjoint (residual ℝ) volume.ae :=
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_right eventually_residual_liouville ae_not_liouville
|
0cad5606c8bd2cb1f902f51f3f518d059beafdca | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /test/apply.lean | a7e6e0cfb0bd4d518a9a725f4d53f1d24011ffa1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,069 | lean |
import tactic.apply
import topology.instances.real
-- algebra.pi_instances
example : ∀ n m : ℕ, n + m = m + n :=
begin
apply' nat.rec,
-- refine nat.rec _ _,
{ intros n h m,
ring, },
{ intro m, ring }
end
instance : partial_order unit :=
{ le := λ _ _, ∀ (x : ℕ), x = x,
lt := λ _ _, false,
le_refl := λ _ _, rfl,
le_trans := λ _ _ _ _ _ _, rfl,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ _ _, by simp,
le_antisymm := λ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _ _, rfl }
example : unit.star ≤ unit.star :=
begin
apply' le_trans,
-- refine le_trans _ _,
-- exact unit.star,
refl', refl'
-- refine le_refl _, refine le_refl _,
end
example {α β : Type*} [partial_order β] (x y z : α → β) (h₀ : x ≤ y) (h₁ : y ≤ z) : x ≤ z :=
begin
transitivity'; assumption
end
example : continuous (λ (x : ℝ), x + x) :=
begin
apply' continuous.add,
guard_target' continuous (λ (x : ℝ), x), apply @continuous_id ℝ _,
guard_target' continuous (λ (x : ℝ), x), apply @continuous_id ℝ _,
-- guard_target' has_continuous_add ℝ, admit,
end
|
02c384caab10ae4f88ea2bd0a15e530a5853330d | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/logic/basic.lean | 043d20e39c8dafea50fd0ab0a6f9735e13ace168 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 58,744 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import tactic.doc_commands
import tactic.reserved_notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace "decidable".
Classical versions are in the namespace "classical".
In the presence of automation, this whole file may be unnecessary. On the other hand,
maybe it is useful for writing automation.
-/
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
section miscellany
/- We add the `inline` attribute to optimize VM computation using these declarations. For example,
`if p ∧ q then ... else ...` will not evaluate the decidability of `q` if `p` is false. -/
attribute [inline] and.decidable or.decidable decidable.false xor.decidable iff.decidable
decidable.true implies.decidable not.decidable ne.decidable
bool.decidable_eq decidable.to_bool
attribute [simp] cast_eq cast_heq
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
@[reducible] def hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
/-- Ex falso, the nondependent eliminator for the `empty` type. -/
def empty.elim {C : Sort*} : empty → C.
instance : subsingleton empty := ⟨λa, a.elim⟩
instance subsingleton.prod {α β : Type*} [subsingleton α] [subsingleton β] : subsingleton (α × β) :=
⟨by { intros a b, cases a, cases b, congr, }⟩
instance : decidable_eq empty := λa, a.elim
instance sort.inhabited : inhabited (Sort*) := ⟨punit⟩
instance sort.inhabited' : inhabited (default (Sort*)) := ⟨punit.star⟩
instance psum.inhabited_left {α β} [inhabited α] : inhabited (psum α β) := ⟨psum.inl (default _)⟩
instance psum.inhabited_right {α β} [inhabited β] : inhabited (psum α β) := ⟨psum.inr (default _)⟩
@[priority 10] instance decidable_eq_of_subsingleton
{α} [subsingleton α] : decidable_eq α
| a b := is_true (subsingleton.elim a b)
@[simp] lemma eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton {α : Sort*} [subsingleton α] (x y : α) :
x = y ↔ true :=
by cc
/-- If all points are equal to a given point `x`, then `α` is a subsingleton. -/
lemma subsingleton_of_forall_eq {α : Sort*} (x : α) (h : ∀ y, y = x) : subsingleton α :=
⟨λ a b, (h a).symm ▸ (h b).symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma subsingleton_iff_forall_eq {α : Sort*} (x : α) : subsingleton α ↔ ∀ y, y = x :=
⟨λ h y, @subsingleton.elim _ h y x, subsingleton_of_forall_eq x⟩
-- TODO[gh-6025]: make this an instance once safe to do so
lemma subtype.subsingleton (α : Sort*) [subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : subsingleton (subtype p) :=
⟨λ ⟨x,_⟩ ⟨y,_⟩, have x = y, from subsingleton.elim _ _, by { cases this, refl }⟩
/-- Add an instance to "undo" coercion transitivity into a chain of coercions, because
most simp lemmas are stated with respect to simple coercions and will not match when
part of a chain. -/
@[simp] theorem coe_coe {α β γ} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_t β γ]
(a : α) : (a : γ) = (a : β) := rfl
theorem coe_fn_coe_trans
{α β γ} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_t_aux β γ] [has_coe_to_fun γ]
(x : α) : @coe_fn α _ x = @coe_fn β _ x := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_coe_base
{α β} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_to_fun β]
(x : α) : @coe_fn α _ x = @coe_fn β _ x := rfl
theorem coe_sort_coe_trans
{α β γ} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_t_aux β γ] [has_coe_to_sort γ]
(x : α) : @coe_sort α _ x = @coe_sort β _ x := rfl
/--
Many structures such as bundled morphisms coerce to functions so that you can
transparently apply them to arguments. For example, if `e : α ≃ β` and `a : α`
then you can write `e a` and this is elaborated as `⇑e a`. This type of
coercion is implemented using the `has_coe_to_fun` type class. There is one
important consideration:
If a type coerces to another type which in turn coerces to a function,
then it **must** implement `has_coe_to_fun` directly:
```lean
structure sparkling_equiv (α β) extends α ≃ β
-- if we add a `has_coe` instance,
instance {α β} : has_coe (sparkling_equiv α β) (α ≃ β) :=
⟨sparkling_equiv.to_equiv⟩
-- then a `has_coe_to_fun` instance **must** be added as well:
instance {α β} : has_coe_to_fun (sparkling_equiv α β) :=
⟨λ _, α → β, λ f, f.to_equiv.to_fun⟩
```
(Rationale: if we do not declare the direct coercion, then `⇑e a` is not in
simp-normal form. The lemma `coe_fn_coe_base` will unfold it to `⇑↑e a`. This
often causes loops in the simplifier.)
-/
library_note "function coercion"
@[simp] theorem coe_sort_coe_base
{α β} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_to_sort β]
(x : α) : @coe_sort α _ x = @coe_sort β _ x := rfl
/-- `pempty` is the universe-polymorphic analogue of `empty`. -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive {u} pempty : Sort u
/-- Ex falso, the nondependent eliminator for the `pempty` type. -/
def pempty.elim {C : Sort*} : pempty → C.
instance subsingleton_pempty : subsingleton pempty := ⟨λa, a.elim⟩
@[simp] lemma not_nonempty_pempty : ¬ nonempty pempty :=
assume ⟨h⟩, h.elim
@[simp] theorem forall_pempty {P : pempty → Prop} : (∀ x : pempty, P x) ↔ true :=
⟨λ h, trivial, λ h x, by cases x⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_pempty {P : pempty → Prop} : (∃ x : pempty, P x) ↔ false :=
⟨λ h, by { cases h with w, cases w }, false.elim⟩
lemma congr_arg_heq {α} {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) : ∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → f a₁ == f a₂
| a _ rfl := heq.rfl
lemma plift.down_inj {α : Sort*} : ∀ (a b : plift α), a.down = b.down → a = b
| ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ rfl := rfl
-- missing [symm] attribute for ne in core.
attribute [symm] ne.symm
lemma ne_comm {α} {a b : α} : a ≠ b ↔ b ≠ a := ⟨ne.symm, ne.symm⟩
@[simp] lemma eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} :
(∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ (b = c) :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← h], λ h a, by rw h⟩
@[simp] lemma eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} :
(∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ (a = b) :=
⟨λ h, by rw h, λ h a, by rw h⟩
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `zmod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[fact p.prime]` to `zmod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class fact (p : Prop) : Prop := (out [] : p)
lemma fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : fact p) : p := h.1
lemma fact_iff {p : Prop} : fact p ↔ p := ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
end miscellany
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
theorem false_ne_true : false ≠ true
| h := h.symm ▸ trivial
section propositional
variables {a b c d : Prop}
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
instance : is_refl Prop iff := ⟨iff.refl⟩
instance : is_trans Prop iff := ⟨λ _ _ _, iff.trans⟩
theorem iff_of_eq (e : a = b) : a ↔ b := e ▸ iff.rfl
theorem iff_iff_eq : (a ↔ b) ↔ a = b := ⟨propext, iff_of_eq⟩
@[simp] lemma eq_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : (p = q) ↔ (p ↔ q) := iff_iff_eq.symm
@[simp] theorem imp_self : (a → a) ↔ true := iff_true_intro id
theorem imp_intro {α β : Prop} (h : α) : β → α := λ _, h
theorem imp_false : (a → false) ↔ ¬ a := iff.rfl
theorem imp_and_distrib {α} : (α → b ∧ c) ↔ (α → b) ∧ (α → c) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ ha, (h ha).left, λ ha, (h ha).right⟩,
λ h ha, ⟨h.left ha, h.right ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem and_imp : (a ∧ b → c) ↔ (a → b → c) :=
iff.intro (λ h ha hb, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) (λ h ⟨ha, hb⟩, h ha hb)
theorem iff_def : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (b → a) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _
theorem iff_def' : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b → a) ∧ (a → b) :=
iff_def.trans and.comm
theorem imp_true_iff {α : Sort*} : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ_, trivial
theorem imp_iff_right (ha : a) : (a → b) ↔ b :=
⟨λf, f ha, imp_intro⟩
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
/-- Ex falso for negation. From `¬ a` and `a` anything follows. This is the same as `absurd` with
the arguments flipped, but it is in the `not` namespace so that projection notation can be used. -/
def not.elim {α : Sort*} (H1 : ¬a) (H2 : a) : α := absurd H2 H1
@[reducible] theorem not.imp {a b : Prop} (H2 : ¬b) (H1 : a → b) : ¬a := mt H1 H2
theorem not_not_of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → ¬¬a :=
mt not.elim
theorem not_of_not_imp {a : Prop} : ¬(a → b) → ¬b :=
mt imp_intro
theorem dec_em (p : Prop) [decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p := decidable.em p
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).swap
theorem em (p : Prop) : p ∨ ¬p := classical.em _
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).swap
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
section eq_or_ne
variables {α : Sort*} (x y : α)
theorem decidable.eq_or_ne [decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := dec_em $ x = y
theorem decidable.ne_or_eq [decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := dec_em' $ x = y
theorem eq_or_ne : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em $ x = y
theorem ne_or_eq : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' $ x = y
end eq_or_ne
theorem by_contradiction {p} : (¬p → false) → p := decidable.by_contradiction
-- alias by_contradiction ← by_contra
theorem by_contra {p} : (¬p → false) → p := decidable.by_contradiction
/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable namespace"
/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_not [decidable a] : ¬¬a ↔ a :=
iff.intro decidable.by_contradiction not_not_intro
/-- The Double Negation Theorem: `¬ ¬ P` is equivalent to `P`.
The left-to-right direction, double negation elimination (DNE),
is classically true but not constructively. -/
@[simp] theorem not_not : ¬¬a ↔ a := decidable.not_not
theorem of_not_not : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.of_not_imp [decidable a] (h : ¬ (a → b)) : a :=
decidable.by_contradiction (not_not_of_not_imp h)
theorem of_not_imp : ¬ (a → b) → a := decidable.of_not_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_imp_symm [decidable a] (h : ¬a → b) (hb : ¬b) : a :=
decidable.by_contradiction $ hb ∘ h
theorem not.decidable_imp_symm [decidable a] : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := not.decidable_imp_symm
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_imp_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬a → b) ↔ (¬b → a) :=
⟨not.decidable_imp_symm, not.decidable_imp_symm⟩
theorem not_imp_comm : (¬a → b) ↔ (¬b → a) := decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem imp_not_self : (a → ¬a) ↔ ¬a := ⟨λ h ha, h ha ha, λ h _, h⟩
theorem decidable.not_imp_self [decidable a] : (¬a → a) ↔ a :=
by { have := @imp_not_self (¬a), rwa decidable.not_not at this }
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : (¬a → a) ↔ a := decidable.not_imp_self
theorem imp.swap : (a → b → c) ↔ (b → a → c) :=
⟨function.swap, function.swap⟩
theorem imp_not_comm : (a → ¬b) ↔ (b → ¬a) :=
imp.swap
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
theorem and_congr_left (h : c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c :=
and.comm.trans $ (and_congr_right h).trans and.comm
theorem and_congr_left' (h : a ↔ b) : a ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c := and_congr h iff.rfl
theorem and_congr_right' (h : b ↔ c) : a ∧ b ↔ a ∧ c := and_congr iff.rfl h
theorem not_and_of_not_left (b : Prop) : ¬a → ¬(a ∧ b) :=
mt and.left
theorem not_and_of_not_right (a : Prop) {b : Prop} : ¬b → ¬(a ∧ b) :=
mt and.right
theorem and.imp_left (h : a → b) : a ∧ c → b ∧ c :=
and.imp h id
theorem and.imp_right (h : a → b) : c ∧ a → c ∧ b :=
and.imp id h
lemma and.right_comm : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∧ b :=
by simp only [and.left_comm, and.comm]
lemma and.rotate : a ∧ b ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c ∧ a :=
by simp only [and.left_comm, and.comm]
theorem and_not_self_iff (a : Prop) : a ∧ ¬ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume h, (h.right) (h.left)) (assume h, h.elim)
theorem not_and_self_iff (a : Prop) : ¬ a ∧ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨hna, ha⟩, hna ha) false.elim
theorem and_iff_left_of_imp {a b : Prop} (h : a → b) : (a ∧ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (λ ha, ⟨ha, h ha⟩)
theorem and_iff_right_of_imp {a b : Prop} (h : b → a) : (a ∧ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro and.right (λ hb, ⟨h hb, hb⟩)
@[simp] theorem and_iff_left_iff_imp {a b : Prop} : ((a ∧ b) ↔ a) ↔ (a → b) :=
⟨λ h ha, (h.2 ha).2, and_iff_left_of_imp⟩
@[simp] theorem and_iff_right_iff_imp {a b : Prop} : ((a ∧ b) ↔ b) ↔ (b → a) :=
⟨λ h ha, (h.2 ha).1, and_iff_right_of_imp⟩
@[simp] lemma iff_self_and {p q : Prop} : (p ↔ p ∧ q) ↔ (p → q) :=
by rw [@iff.comm p, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
@[simp] lemma iff_and_self {p q : Prop} : (p ↔ q ∧ p) ↔ (p → q) :=
by rw [and_comm, iff_self_and]
@[simp] lemma and.congr_right_iff : (a ∧ b ↔ a ∧ c) ↔ (a → (b ↔ c)) :=
⟨λ h ha, by simp [ha] at h; exact h, and_congr_right⟩
@[simp] lemma and.congr_left_iff : (a ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c) ↔ c → (a ↔ b) :=
by simp only [and.comm, ← and.congr_right_iff]
@[simp] lemma and_self_left : a ∧ a ∧ b ↔ a ∧ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.1, h.2.2⟩, λ h, ⟨h.1, h.1, h.2⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma and_self_right : (a ∧ b) ∧ b ↔ a ∧ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.1.1, h.2⟩, λ h, ⟨⟨h.1, h.2⟩, h.2⟩⟩
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
theorem or_congr_left (h : a ↔ b) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c := or_congr h iff.rfl
theorem or_congr_right (h : b ↔ c) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c := or_congr iff.rfl h
theorem or.right_comm : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ (a ∨ c) ∨ b := by rw [or_assoc, or_assoc, or_comm b]
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_of_imp (h₁ : a ∨ b) (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → d) : c ∨ d :=
or.imp h₂ h₃ h₁
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_left (h₁ : a ∨ c) (h : a → b) : b ∨ c :=
or.imp_left h h₁
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_right (h₁ : c ∨ a) (h : a → b) : c ∨ b :=
or.imp_right h h₁
theorem or.elim3 (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
or.elim h ha (assume h₂, or.elim h₂ hb hc)
theorem or_imp_distrib : (a ∨ b → c) ↔ (a → c) ∧ (b → c) :=
⟨assume h, ⟨assume ha, h (or.inl ha), assume hb, h (or.inr hb)⟩,
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, or.rec ha hb⟩
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.or_iff_not_imp_left [decidable a] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ a → b) :=
⟨or.resolve_left, λ h, dite _ or.inl (or.inr ∘ h)⟩
theorem or_iff_not_imp_left : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ a → b) := decidable.or_iff_not_imp_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.or_iff_not_imp_right [decidable b] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ b → a) :=
or.comm.trans decidable.or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem or_iff_not_imp_right : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ b → a) := decidable.or_iff_not_imp_right
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_imp_not [decidable a] : (¬ a → ¬ b) ↔ (b → a) :=
⟨assume h hb, decidable.by_contradiction $ assume na, h na hb, mt⟩
theorem not_imp_not : (¬ a → ¬ b) ↔ (b → a) := decidable.not_imp_not
@[simp] theorem or_iff_left_iff_imp : (a ∨ b ↔ a) ↔ (b → a) :=
⟨λ h hb, h.1 (or.inr hb), or_iff_left_of_imp⟩
@[simp] theorem or_iff_right_iff_imp : (a ∨ b ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) :=
by rw [or_comm, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-- `∧` distributes over `∨` (on the left). -/
theorem and_or_distrib_left : a ∧ (b ∨ c) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (a ∧ c) :=
⟨λ ⟨ha, hbc⟩, hbc.imp (and.intro ha) (and.intro ha),
or.rec (and.imp_right or.inl) (and.imp_right or.inr)⟩
/-- `∧` distributes over `∨` (on the right). -/
theorem or_and_distrib_right : (a ∨ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∨ (b ∧ c) :=
(and.comm.trans and_or_distrib_left).trans (or_congr and.comm and.comm)
/-- `∨` distributes over `∧` (on the left). -/
theorem or_and_distrib_left : a ∨ (b ∧ c) ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ c) :=
⟨or.rec (λha, and.intro (or.inl ha) (or.inl ha)) (and.imp or.inr or.inr),
and.rec $ or.rec (imp_intro ∘ or.inl) (or.imp_right ∘ and.intro)⟩
/-- `∨` distributes over `∧` (on the right). -/
theorem and_or_distrib_right : (a ∧ b) ∨ c ↔ (a ∨ c) ∧ (b ∨ c) :=
(or.comm.trans or_and_distrib_left).trans (and_congr or.comm or.comm)
@[simp] lemma or_self_left : a ∨ a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ b :=
⟨λ h, h.elim or.inl id, λ h, h.elim or.inl (or.inr ∘ or.inr)⟩
@[simp] lemma or_self_right : (a ∨ b) ∨ b ↔ a ∨ b :=
⟨λ h, h.elim id or.inr, λ h, h.elim (or.inl ∘ or.inl) or.inr⟩
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
theorem iff_of_true (ha : a) (hb : b) : a ↔ b :=
⟨λ_, hb, λ _, ha⟩
theorem iff_of_false (ha : ¬a) (hb : ¬b) : a ↔ b :=
⟨ha.elim, hb.elim⟩
theorem iff_true_left (ha : a) : (a ↔ b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ h, h.1 ha, iff_of_true ha⟩
theorem iff_true_right (ha : a) : (b ↔ a) ↔ b :=
iff.comm.trans (iff_true_left ha)
theorem iff_false_left (ha : ¬a) : (a ↔ b) ↔ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, mt h.2 ha, iff_of_false ha⟩
theorem iff_false_right (ha : ¬a) : (b ↔ a) ↔ ¬b :=
iff.comm.trans (iff_false_left ha)
@[simp]
lemma iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) true.intro = h := rfl
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_or_of_imp [decidable a] (h : a → b) : ¬ a ∨ b :=
if ha : a then or.inr (h ha) else or.inl ha
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬ a ∨ b := decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.imp_iff_not_or [decidable a] : (a → b) ↔ (¬ a ∨ b) :=
⟨decidable.not_or_of_imp, or.neg_resolve_left⟩
theorem imp_iff_not_or : (a → b) ↔ (¬ a ∨ b) := decidable.imp_iff_not_or
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.imp_or_distrib [decidable a] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
by simp [decidable.imp_iff_not_or, or.comm, or.left_comm]
theorem imp_or_distrib : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) := decidable.imp_or_distrib
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.imp_or_distrib' [decidable b] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
by by_cases b; simp [h, or_iff_right_of_imp ((∘) false.elim)]
theorem imp_or_distrib' : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) := decidable.imp_or_distrib'
theorem not_imp_of_and_not : a ∧ ¬ b → ¬ (a → b)
| ⟨ha, hb⟩ h := hb $ h ha
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_imp [decidable a] : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨decidable.of_not_imp h, not_of_not_imp h⟩, not_imp_of_and_not⟩
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := decidable.not_imp
-- for monotonicity
lemma imp_imp_imp (h₀ : c → a) (h₁ : b → d) : (a → b) → (c → d) :=
assume (h₂ : a → b), h₁ ∘ h₂ ∘ h₀
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.peirce (a b : Prop) [decidable a] : ((a → b) → a) → a :=
if ha : a then λ h, ha else λ h, h ha.elim
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := decidable.peirce _ _
theorem peirce' {a : Prop} (H : ∀ b : Prop, (a → b) → a) : a := H _ id
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_iff_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬ a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (a ↔ b) :=
by rw [@iff_def (¬ a), @iff_def' a]; exact and_congr decidable.not_imp_not decidable.not_imp_not
theorem not_iff_not : (¬ a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := decidable.not_iff_not
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_iff_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬ a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ b ↔ a) :=
by rw [@iff_def (¬ a), @iff_def (¬ b)]; exact and_congr decidable.not_imp_comm imp_not_comm
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬ a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ b ↔ a) := decidable.not_iff_comm
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_iff : ∀ [decidable b], ¬ (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ a ↔ b) :=
by intro h; cases h; simp only [h, iff_true, iff_false]
theorem not_iff : ¬ (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ a ↔ b) := decidable.not_iff
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.iff_not_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬ a) :=
by rw [@iff_def a, @iff_def b]; exact and_congr imp_not_comm decidable.not_imp_comm
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬ a) := decidable.iff_not_comm
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not [decidable b] :
(a ↔ b) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (¬ a ∧ ¬ b) :=
by { split; intro h,
{ rw h; by_cases b; [left,right]; split; assumption },
{ cases h with h h; cases h; split; intro; { contradiction <|> assumption } } }
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (¬ a ∧ ¬ b) :=
decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
lemma decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not [decidable a] [decidable b] :
(a ↔ b) ↔ ((¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b)) :=
begin
rw [iff_iff_implies_and_implies a b],
simp only [decidable.imp_iff_not_or, or.comm]
end
lemma iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ ((¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b)) :=
decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_and_not_right [decidable b] : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ (a → b) :=
⟨λ h ha, h.decidable_imp_symm $ and.intro ha, λ h ⟨ha, hb⟩, hb $ h ha⟩
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ (a → b) := decidable.not_and_not_right
/-- Transfer decidability of `a` to decidability of `b`, if the propositions are equivalent.
**Important**: this function should be used instead of `rw` on `decidable b`, because the
kernel will get stuck reducing the usage of `propext` otherwise,
and `dec_trivial` will not work. -/
@[inline] def decidable_of_iff (a : Prop) (h : a ↔ b) [D : decidable a] : decidable b :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff D h
/-- Transfer decidability of `b` to decidability of `a`, if the propositions are equivalent.
This is the same as `decidable_of_iff` but the iff is flipped. -/
@[inline] def decidable_of_iff' (b : Prop) (h : a ↔ b) [D : decidable b] : decidable a :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff D h.symm
/-- Prove that `a` is decidable by constructing a boolean `b` and a proof that `b ↔ a`.
(This is sometimes taken as an alternate definition of decidability.) -/
def decidable_of_bool : ∀ (b : bool) (h : b ↔ a), decidable a
| tt h := is_true (h.1 rfl)
| ff h := is_false (mt h.2 bool.ff_ne_tt)
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
theorem not_and_of_not_or_not (h : ¬ a ∨ ¬ b) : ¬ (a ∧ b)
| ⟨ha, hb⟩ := or.elim h (absurd ha) (absurd hb)
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_and_distrib [decidable a] : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, if ha : a then or.inr (λ hb, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) else or.inl ha, not_and_of_not_or_not⟩
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_and_distrib' [decidable b] : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, if hb : b then or.inl (λ ha, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) else or.inr hb, not_and_of_not_or_not⟩
/-- One of de Morgan's laws: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_distrib : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := decidable.not_and_distrib
@[simp] theorem not_and : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ (a → ¬ b) := and_imp
theorem not_and' : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ b → ¬a :=
not_and.trans imp_not_comm
/-- One of de Morgan's laws: the negation of a disjunction is logically equivalent to the
conjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_or_distrib : ¬ (a ∨ b) ↔ ¬ a ∧ ¬ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ ha, h (or.inl ha), λ hb, h (or.inr hb)⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h, or.elim h h₁ h₂⟩
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.or_iff_not_and_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : a ∨ b ↔ ¬ (¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
by rw [← not_or_distrib, decidable.not_not]
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬ (¬a ∧ ¬b) := decidable.or_iff_not_and_not
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.and_iff_not_or_not [decidable a] [decidable b] :
a ∧ b ↔ ¬ (¬ a ∨ ¬ b) :=
by rw [← decidable.not_and_distrib, decidable.not_not]
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬ (¬ a ∨ ¬ b) := decidable.and_iff_not_or_not
end propositional
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
section equality
variables {α : Sort*} {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem heq_iff_eq : a == b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_heq, heq_of_eq⟩
theorem proof_irrel_heq {p q : Prop} (hp : p) (hq : q) : hp == hq :=
have p = q, from propext ⟨λ _, hq, λ _, hp⟩,
by subst q; refl
theorem ne_of_mem_of_not_mem {α β} [has_mem α β] {s : β} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ s) : b ∉ s → a ≠ b :=
mt $ λ e, e ▸ h
lemma ne_of_apply_ne {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {x y : α} (h : f x ≠ f y) : x ≠ y :=
λ (w : x = y), h (congr_arg f w)
theorem eq_equivalence : equivalence (@eq α) :=
⟨eq.refl, @eq.symm _, @eq.trans _⟩
/-- Transport through trivial families is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma eq_rec_constant {α : Sort*} {a a' : α} {β : Sort*} (y : β) (h : a = a') :
(@eq.rec α a (λ a, β) y a' h) = y :=
by { cases h, refl, }
@[simp]
lemma eq_mp_eq_cast {α β : Sort*} (h : α = β) : eq.mp h = cast h := rfl
@[simp]
lemma eq_mpr_eq_cast {α β : Sort*} (h : α = β) : eq.mpr h = cast h.symm := rfl
@[simp]
lemma cast_cast : ∀ {α β γ : Sort*} (ha : α = β) (hb : β = γ) (a : α),
cast hb (cast ha a) = cast (ha.trans hb) a
| _ _ _ rfl rfl a := rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (eq.refl a) = eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_fun (eq.refl f) a = eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (λ a, f a b) p :=
rfl
lemma heq_of_cast_eq :
∀ {α β : Sort*} {a : α} {a' : β} (e : α = β) (h₂ : cast e a = a'), a == a'
| α ._ a a' rfl h := eq.rec_on h (heq.refl _)
lemma cast_eq_iff_heq {α β : Sort*} {a : α} {a' : β} {e : α = β} : cast e a = a' ↔ a == a' :=
⟨heq_of_cast_eq _, λ h, by cases h; refl⟩
lemma rec_heq_of_heq {β} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} (eq : a = b) (h : x == y) :
@eq.rec α a C x b eq == y :=
by subst eq; exact h
protected lemma eq.congr {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : α} (h₁ : x₁ = y₁) (h₂ : x₂ = y₂) :
(x₁ = x₂) ↔ (y₁ = y₂) :=
by { subst h₁, subst h₂ }
lemma eq.congr_left {x y z : α} (h : x = y) : x = z ↔ y = z := by rw [h]
lemma eq.congr_right {x y z : α} (h : x = y) : z = x ↔ z = y := by rw [h]
lemma congr_arg2 {α β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) {x x' : α} {y y' : β}
(hx : x = x') (hy : y = y') : f x y = f x' y' :=
by { subst hx, subst hy }
end equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section quantifiers
variables {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} {p q : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
lemma forall_imp (h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : (∀ a, p a) → ∀ a, q a :=
λ h' a, h a (h' a)
lemma forall₂_congr {p q : α → β → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b ↔ q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) ↔ (∀ a b, q a b) :=
forall_congr (λ a, forall_congr (h a))
lemma forall₃_congr {γ : Sort*} {p q : α → β → γ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b c, p a b c ↔ q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) ↔ (∀ a b c, q a b c) :=
forall_congr (λ a, forall₂_congr (h a))
lemma forall₄_congr {γ δ : Sort*} {p q : α → β → γ → δ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b c d, p a b c d ↔ q a b c d) :
(∀ a b c d, p a b c d) ↔ (∀ a b c d, q a b c d) :=
forall_congr (λ a, forall₃_congr (h a))
lemma Exists.imp (h : ∀ a, (p a → q a)) (p : ∃ a, p a) : ∃ a, q a := exists_imp_exists h p
lemma exists_imp_exists' {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (hpq : ∀ a, p a → q (f a))
(hp : ∃ a, p a) : ∃ b, q b :=
exists.elim hp (λ a hp', ⟨_, hpq _ hp'⟩)
lemma exists₂_congr {p q : α → β → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b ↔ q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) ↔ (∃ a b, q a b) :=
exists_congr (λ a, exists_congr (h a))
lemma exists₃_congr {γ : Sort*} {p q : α → β → γ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b c, p a b c ↔ q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) ↔ (∃ a b c, q a b c) :=
exists_congr (λ a, exists₂_congr (h a))
lemma exists₄_congr {γ δ : Sort*} {p q : α → β → γ → δ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b c d, p a b c d ↔ q a b c d) :
(∃ a b c d, p a b c d) ↔ (∃ a b c d, q a b c d) :=
exists_congr (λ a, exists₃_congr (h a))
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨function.swap, function.swap⟩
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨λ ⟨x, y, h⟩, ⟨y, x, h⟩, λ ⟨y, x, h⟩, ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_imp_distrib : ((∃ x, p x) → b) ↔ ∀ x, p x → b :=
⟨λ h x hpx, h ⟨x, hpx⟩, λ h ⟨x, hpx⟩, h x hpx⟩
/--
Extract an element from a existential statement, using `classical.some`.
-/
-- This enables projection notation.
@[reducible] noncomputable def Exists.some {p : α → Prop} (P : ∃ a, p a) : α := classical.some P
/--
Show that an element extracted from `P : ∃ a, p a` using `P.some` satisfies `p`.
-/
lemma Exists.some_spec {p : α → Prop} (P : ∃ a, p a) : p (P.some) := classical.some_spec P
--theorem forall_not_of_not_exists (h : ¬ ∃ x, p x) : ∀ x, ¬ p x :=
--forall_imp_of_exists_imp h
theorem not_exists_of_forall_not (h : ∀ x, ¬ p x) : ¬ ∃ x, p x :=
exists_imp_distrib.2 h
@[simp] theorem not_exists : (¬ ∃ x, p x) ↔ ∀ x, ¬ p x :=
exists_imp_distrib
theorem not_forall_of_exists_not : (∃ x, ¬ p x) → ¬ ∀ x, p x
| ⟨x, hn⟩ h := hn (h x)
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_forall {p : α → Prop}
[decidable (∃ x, ¬ p x)] [∀ x, decidable (p x)] : (¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬ p x :=
⟨not.decidable_imp_symm $ λ nx x, nx.decidable_imp_symm $ λ h, ⟨x, h⟩,
not_forall_of_exists_not⟩
@[simp] theorem not_forall {p : α → Prop} : (¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬ p x := decidable.not_forall
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_forall_not [decidable (∃ x, p x)] :
(¬ ∀ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
(@decidable.not_iff_comm _ _ _ (decidable_of_iff (¬ ∃ x, p x) not_exists)).1 not_exists
theorem not_forall_not : (¬ ∀ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := decidable.not_forall_not
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_exists_not [∀ x, decidable (p x)] : (¬ ∃ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
by simp [decidable.not_not]
@[simp] theorem not_exists_not : (¬ ∃ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x := decidable.not_exists_not
-- TODO: duplicate of a lemma in core
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → true) ↔ true :=
implies_true_iff α
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ true) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ _, of_iff_true (h _))
@[simp] theorem forall_2_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → true) ↔ true :=
forall_true_iff' $ λ _, forall_true_iff
@[simp] theorem forall_3_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : Π a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ a (b : β a), γ a b → true) ↔ true :=
forall_true_iff' $ λ _, forall_2_true_iff
lemma exists_unique.exists {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃! x, p x) : ∃ x, p x :=
exists.elim h (λ x hx, ⟨x, and.left hx⟩)
@[simp] lemma exists_unique_iff_exists {α : Sort*} [subsingleton α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃! x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
⟨λ h, h.exists, Exists.imp $ λ x hx, ⟨hx, λ y _, subsingleton.elim y x⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_const (α : Sort*) [i : nonempty α] : (α → b) ↔ b :=
⟨i.elim, λ hb x, hb⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_const (α : Sort*) [i : nonempty α] : (∃ x : α, b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ ⟨x, h⟩, h, i.elim exists.intro⟩
theorem exists_unique_const (α : Sort*) [i : nonempty α] [subsingleton α] :
(∃! x : α, b) ↔ b :=
by simp
theorem forall_and_distrib : (∀ x, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ (∀ x, q x) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ x, (h x).left, λ x, (h x).right⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ x, ⟨h₁ x, h₂ x⟩⟩
theorem exists_or_distrib : (∃ x, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∨ (∃ x, q x) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hpq⟩, hpq.elim (λ hpx, or.inl ⟨x, hpx⟩) (λ hqx, or.inr ⟨x, hqx⟩),
λ hepq, hepq.elim (λ ⟨x, hpx⟩, ⟨x, or.inl hpx⟩) (λ ⟨x, hqx⟩, ⟨x, or.inr hqx⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_and_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃x, q ∧ p x) ↔ q ∧ (∃x, p x) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hq, hp⟩, ⟨hq, x, hp⟩, λ ⟨hq, x, hp⟩, ⟨x, hq, hp⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_and_distrib_right {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃x, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃x, p x) ∧ q :=
by simp [and_comm]
@[simp] theorem forall_eq {a' : α} : (∀a, a = a' → p a) ↔ p a' :=
⟨λ h, h a' rfl, λ h a e, e.symm ▸ h⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_eq' {a' : α} : (∀a, a' = a → p a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
-- this lemma is needed to simplify the output of `list.mem_cons_iff`
@[simp] theorem forall_eq_or_imp {a' : α} : (∀ a, a = a' ∨ q a → p a) ↔ p a' ∧ ∀ a, q a → p a :=
by simp only [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem exists_eq {a' : α} : ∃ a, a = a' := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq' {a' : α} : ∃ a, a' = a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left {a' : α} : (∃ a, a = a' ∧ p a) ↔ p a' :=
⟨λ ⟨a, e, h⟩, e ▸ h, λ h, ⟨_, rfl, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right {a' : α} : (∃ a, p a ∧ a = a') ↔ p a' :=
(exists_congr $ by exact λ a, and.comm).trans exists_eq_left
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right_right {a' : α} :
(∃ (a : α), p a ∧ b ∧ a = a') ↔ p a' ∧ b :=
⟨λ ⟨_, hp, hq, rfl⟩, ⟨hp, hq⟩, λ ⟨hp, hq⟩, ⟨a', hp, hq, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right_right' {a' : α} :
(∃ (a : α), p a ∧ b ∧ a' = a) ↔ p a' ∧ b :=
⟨λ ⟨_, hp, hq, rfl⟩, ⟨hp, hq⟩, λ ⟨hp, hq⟩, ⟨a', hp, hq, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_apply_eq_apply {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a = f a' :=
⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a :=
⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨λ ⟨b, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩, ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, λ ⟨a, hp, hq⟩, ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨λ ⟨b, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩, ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, λ ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma exists_or_eq_left (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ (x : α), x = y ∨ p x :=
⟨y, or.inl rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma exists_or_eq_right (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ (x : α), p x ∨ x = y :=
⟨y, or.inr rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma exists_or_eq_left' (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ (x : α), y = x ∨ p x :=
⟨y, or.inl rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma exists_or_eq_right' (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ (x : α), p x ∨ y = x :=
⟨y, or.inr rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a, ∀ b, f a = b → p b) ↔ (∀ a, p (f a)) :=
⟨λ h a, h a (f a) rfl, λ h a b hab, hab ▸ h a⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ b, ∀ a, f a = b → p b) ↔ (∀ a, p (f a)) :=
by { rw forall_swap, simp }
@[simp] theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a, ∀ b, b = f a → p b) ↔ (∀ a, p (f a)) :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ _ (f _)]
@[simp] theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ b, ∀ a, b = f a → p b) ↔ (∀ a, p (f a)) :=
by { rw forall_swap, simp }
@[simp] theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂ {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∀ b, ∀ a, p a → f a = b → q b) ↔ ∀ a, p a → q (f a) :=
⟨λ h a ha, h (f a) a ha rfl, λ h b a ha hb, hb ▸ h a ha⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left' {a' : α} : (∃ a, a' = a ∧ p a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right' {a' : α} : (∃ a, p a ∧ a' = a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
theorem exists_comm {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ a b, p a b) ↔ ∃ b a, p a b :=
⟨λ ⟨a, b, h⟩, ⟨b, a, h⟩, λ ⟨b, a, h⟩, ⟨a, b, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall (h : b ∨ ∀x, p x) (x) : b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right $ λ h₂, h₂ x
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.forall_or_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [decidable q] :
(∀x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ (∀x, p x) :=
⟨λ h, if hq : q then or.inl hq else or.inr $ λ x, (h x).resolve_left hq,
forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
theorem forall_or_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ (∀x, p x) := decidable.forall_or_distrib_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.forall_or_distrib_right {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [decidable q] :
(∀x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀x, p x) ∨ q :=
by simp [or_comm, decidable.forall_or_distrib_left]
theorem forall_or_distrib_right {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀x, p x) ∨ q := decidable.forall_or_distrib_right
/-- A predicate holds everywhere on the image of a surjective functions iff
it holds everywhere. -/
theorem forall_iff_forall_surj
{α β : Type*} {f : α → β} (h : function.surjective f) {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ a, P (f a)) ↔ ∀ b, P b :=
⟨λ ha b, by cases h b with a hab; rw ←hab; exact ha a, λ hb a, hb $ f a⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_prop {p q : Prop} : (∃ h : p, q) ↔ p ∧ q :=
⟨λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
theorem exists_unique_prop {p q : Prop} : (∃! h : p, q) ↔ p ∧ q :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem exists_false : ¬ (∃a:α, false) := assume ⟨a, h⟩, h
@[simp] lemma exists_unique_false : ¬ (∃! (a : α), false) := assume ⟨a, h, h'⟩, h
theorem Exists.fst {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ := h
theorem Exists.snd {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ := h
theorem forall_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∀ h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@forall_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩
theorem exists_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∃ h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@exists_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩
theorem exists_unique_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∃! h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@exists_unique_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩ _
theorem forall_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (hn : ¬ p) :
(∀ h' : p, q h') ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ h, hn.elim h
theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬ p → ¬ (∃ h' : p, q h') :=
mt Exists.fst
@[congr] lemma exists_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop}
(hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') : Exists q ↔ ∃ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨λ ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨hp.1 ‹_›, (hq _).1 ‹_›⟩, λ ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, (hq _).2 ‹_›⟩⟩
@[congr] lemma exists_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop}
(hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') : Exists q = ∃ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (exists_prop_congr hq _)
@[simp] lemma exists_true_left (p : true → Prop) : (∃ x, p x) ↔ p true.intro :=
exists_prop_of_true _
@[simp] lemma exists_false_left (p : false → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x, p x :=
exists_prop_of_false not_false
lemma exists_unique.unique {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃! x, p x)
{y₁ y₂ : α} (py₁ : p y₁) (py₂ : p y₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
unique_of_exists_unique h py₁ py₂
@[congr] lemma forall_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop}
(hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') : (∀ h, q h) ↔ ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨λ h1 h2, (hq _).1 (h1 (hp.2 _)), λ h1 h2, (hq _).2 (h1 (hp.1 h2))⟩
@[congr] lemma forall_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop}
(hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') : (∀ h, q h) = ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (forall_prop_congr hq _)
@[simp] lemma forall_true_left (p : true → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p true.intro :=
forall_prop_of_true _
@[simp] lemma forall_false_left (p : false → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ true :=
forall_prop_of_false not_false
lemma exists_unique.elim2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Sort*} [∀ x, subsingleton (p x)]
{q : Π x (h : p x), Prop} {b : Prop} (h₂ : ∃! x (h : p x), q x h)
(h₁ : ∀ x (h : p x), q x h → (∀ y (hy : p y), q y hy → y = x) → b) : b :=
begin
simp only [exists_unique_iff_exists] at h₂,
apply h₂.elim,
exact λ x ⟨hxp, hxq⟩ H, h₁ x hxp hxq (λ y hyp hyq, H y ⟨hyp, hyq⟩)
end
lemma exists_unique.intro2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Sort*} [∀ x, subsingleton (p x)]
{q : Π (x : α) (h : p x), Prop} (w : α) (hp : p w) (hq : q w hp)
(H : ∀ y (hy : p y), q y hy → y = w) :
∃! x (hx : p x), q x hx :=
begin
simp only [exists_unique_iff_exists],
exact exists_unique.intro w ⟨hp, hq⟩ (λ y ⟨hyp, hyq⟩, H y hyp hyq)
end
lemma exists_unique.exists2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Sort*} {q : Π (x : α) (h : p x), Prop}
(h : ∃! x (hx : p x), q x hx) :
∃ x (hx : p x), q x hx :=
h.exists.imp (λ x hx, hx.exists)
lemma exists_unique.unique2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Sort*} [∀ x, subsingleton (p x)]
{q : Π (x : α) (hx : p x), Prop} (h : ∃! x (hx : p x), q x hx)
{y₁ y₂ : α} (hpy₁ : p y₁) (hqy₁ : q y₁ hpy₁)
(hpy₂ : p y₂) (hqy₂ : q y₂ hpy₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
begin
simp only [exists_unique_iff_exists] at h,
exact h.unique ⟨hpy₁, hqy₁⟩ ⟨hpy₂, hqy₂⟩
end
end quantifiers
/-! ### Classical lemmas -/
namespace classical
variables {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
theorem cases {p : Prop → Prop} (h1 : p true) (h2 : p false) : ∀a, p a :=
assume a, cases_on a h1 h2
/- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open. -/
noncomputable lemma dec (p : Prop) : decidable p := -- see Note [classical lemma]
by apply_instance
noncomputable lemma dec_pred (p : α → Prop) : decidable_pred p := -- see Note [classical lemma]
by apply_instance
noncomputable lemma dec_rel (p : α → α → Prop) : decidable_rel p := -- see Note [classical lemma]
by apply_instance
noncomputable lemma dec_eq (α : Sort*) : decidable_eq α := -- see Note [classical lemma]
by apply_instance
/--
We make decidability results that depends on `classical.choice` noncomputable lemmas.
* We have to mark them as noncomputable, because otherwise Lean will try to generate bytecode
for them, and fail because it depends on `classical.choice`.
* We make them lemmas, and not definitions, because otherwise later definitions will raise
\"failed to generate bytecode\" errors when writing something like
`letI := classical.dec_eq _`.
Cf. <https://leanprover-community.github.io/archive/stream/113488-general/topic/noncomputable.20theorem.html>
-/
library_note "classical lemma"
/-- Construct a function from a default value `H0`, and a function to use if there exists a value
satisfying the predicate. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
noncomputable def {u} exists_cases {C : Sort u} (H0 : C) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
if h : ∃ a, p a then H (classical.some h) (classical.some_spec h) else H0
lemma some_spec2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {h : ∃a, p a}
(q : α → Prop) (hpq : ∀a, p a → q a) : q (some h) :=
hpq _ $ some_spec _
/-- A version of classical.indefinite_description which is definitionally equal to a pair -/
noncomputable def subtype_of_exists {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop} (h : ∃ x, P x) : {x // P x} :=
⟨classical.some h, classical.some_spec h⟩
end classical
/-- This function has the same type as `exists.rec_on`, and can be used to case on an equality,
but `exists.rec_on` can only eliminate into Prop, while this version eliminates into any universe
using the axiom of choice. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
noncomputable def {u} exists.classical_rec_on
{α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ a, p a) {C : Sort u} (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
H (classical.some h) (classical.some_spec h)
/-! ### Declarations about bounded quantifiers -/
section bounded_quantifiers
variables {α : Sort*} {r p q : α → Prop} {P Q : ∀ x, p x → Prop} {b : Prop}
theorem bex_def : (∃ x (h : p x), q x) ↔ ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨λ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, ⟨x, px, qx⟩, λ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, ⟨x, px, qx⟩⟩
theorem bex.elim {b : Prop} : (∃ x h, P x h) → (∀ a h, P a h → b) → b
| ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩ h' := h' a h₁ h₂
theorem bex.intro (a : α) (h₁ : p a) (h₂ : P a h₁) : ∃ x (h : p x), P x h :=
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ball_congr (H : ∀ x h, P x h ↔ Q x h) :
(∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∀ x h, Q x h) :=
forall_congr $ λ x, forall_congr (H x)
theorem bex_congr (H : ∀ x h, P x h ↔ Q x h) :
(∃ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, Q x h) :=
exists_congr $ λ x, exists_congr (H x)
theorem bex_eq_left {a : α} : (∃ x (_ : x = a), p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [exists_prop, exists_eq_left]
theorem ball.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, (P x h → Q x h))
(h₁ : ∀ x h, P x h) (x h) : Q x h :=
H _ _ $ h₁ _ _
theorem bex.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, (P x h → Q x h)) :
(∃ x h, P x h) → ∃ x h, Q x h
| ⟨x, h, h'⟩ := ⟨_, _, H _ _ h'⟩
theorem ball.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x)
(h₁ : ∀ x, q x → r x) (x) (h : p x) : r x :=
h₁ _ $ H _ h
theorem bex.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(∃ x (_ : p x), r x) → ∃ x (_ : q x), r x
| ⟨x, hp, hr⟩ := ⟨x, H _ hp, hr⟩
theorem ball_of_forall (h : ∀ x, p x) (x) : p x :=
h x
theorem forall_of_ball (H : ∀ x, p x) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) (x) : q x :=
h x $ H x
theorem bex_of_exists (H : ∀ x, p x) : (∃ x, q x) → ∃ x (_ : p x), q x
| ⟨x, hq⟩ := ⟨x, H x, hq⟩
theorem exists_of_bex : (∃ x (_ : p x), q x) → ∃ x, q x
| ⟨x, _, hq⟩ := ⟨x, hq⟩
@[simp] theorem bex_imp_distrib : ((∃ x h, P x h) → b) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h → b) :=
by simp
theorem not_bex : (¬ ∃ x h, P x h) ↔ ∀ x h, ¬ P x h :=
bex_imp_distrib
theorem not_ball_of_bex_not : (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) → ¬ ∀ x h, P x h
| ⟨x, h, hp⟩ al := hp $ al x h
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_ball [decidable (∃ x h, ¬ P x h)] [∀ x h, decidable (P x h)] :
(¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) :=
⟨not.decidable_imp_symm $ λ nx x h, nx.decidable_imp_symm $ λ h', ⟨x, h, h'⟩,
not_ball_of_bex_not⟩
theorem not_ball : (¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) := decidable.not_ball
theorem ball_true_iff (p : α → Prop) : (∀ x, p x → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ h hrx, trivial)
theorem ball_and_distrib : (∀ x h, P x h ∧ Q x h) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h) ∧ (∀ x h, Q x h) :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ x, forall_and_distrib) forall_and_distrib
theorem bex_or_distrib : (∃ x h, P x h ∨ Q x h) ↔ (∃ x h, P x h) ∨ (∃ x h, Q x h) :=
iff.trans (exists_congr $ λ x, exists_or_distrib) exists_or_distrib
theorem ball_or_left_distrib : (∀ x, p x ∨ q x → r x) ↔ (∀ x, p x → r x) ∧ (∀ x, q x → r x) :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ x, or_imp_distrib) forall_and_distrib
theorem bex_or_left_distrib :
(∃ x (_ : p x ∨ q x), r x) ↔ (∃ x (_ : p x), r x) ∨ (∃ x (_ : q x), r x) :=
by simp only [exists_prop]; exact
iff.trans (exists_congr $ λ x, or_and_distrib_right) exists_or_distrib
end bounded_quantifiers
namespace classical
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
theorem not_ball {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {P : Π (x : α), p x → Prop} :
(¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) := _root_.not_ball
end classical
lemma ite_eq_iff {α} {p : Prop} [decidable p] {a b c : α} :
(if p then a else b) = c ↔ p ∧ a = c ∨ ¬p ∧ b = c :=
by by_cases p; simp *
@[simp] lemma ite_eq_left_iff {α} {p : Prop} [decidable p] {a b : α} :
(if p then a else b) = a ↔ (¬p → b = a) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
@[simp] lemma ite_eq_right_iff {α} {p : Prop} [decidable p] {a b : α} :
(if p then a else b) = b ↔ (p → a = b) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
/-! ### Declarations about `nonempty` -/
section nonempty
universe variables u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : α → Type w}
attribute [simp] nonempty_of_inhabited
@[priority 20]
instance has_zero.nonempty [has_zero α] : nonempty α := ⟨0⟩
@[priority 20]
instance has_one.nonempty [has_one α] : nonempty α := ⟨1⟩
lemma exists_true_iff_nonempty {α : Sort*} : (∃a:α, true) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (λ⟨a, _⟩, ⟨a⟩) (λ⟨a⟩, ⟨a, trivial⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Prop {p : Prop} : nonempty p ↔ p :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨h⟩, h) (assume h, ⟨h⟩)
lemma not_nonempty_iff_imp_false {α : Sort*} : ¬ nonempty α ↔ α → false :=
⟨λ h a, h ⟨a⟩, λ h ⟨a⟩, h a⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_sigma : nonempty (Σa:α, γ a) ↔ (∃a:α, nonempty (γ a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩) (assume ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_subtype {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : nonempty (subtype p) ↔ (∃a:α, p a) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, ⟨a, h⟩) (assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_prod : nonempty (α × β) ↔ (nonempty α ∧ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩) (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_pprod {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} :
nonempty (pprod α β) ↔ (nonempty α ∧ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩) (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_sum : nonempty (α ⊕ β) ↔ (nonempty α ∨ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨h⟩, match h with sum.inl a := or.inl ⟨a⟩ | sum.inr b := or.inr ⟨b⟩ end)
(assume h, match h with or.inl ⟨a⟩ := ⟨sum.inl a⟩ | or.inr ⟨b⟩ := ⟨sum.inr b⟩ end)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_psum {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} :
nonempty (psum α β) ↔ (nonempty α ∨ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨h⟩, match h with psum.inl a := or.inl ⟨a⟩ | psum.inr b := or.inr ⟨b⟩ end)
(assume h, match h with or.inl ⟨a⟩ := ⟨psum.inl a⟩ | or.inr ⟨b⟩ := ⟨psum.inr b⟩ end)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_psigma {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} :
nonempty (psigma β) ↔ (∃a:α, nonempty (β a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩) (assume ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_empty : ¬ nonempty empty :=
assume ⟨h⟩, h.elim
@[simp] lemma nonempty_ulift : nonempty (ulift α) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, ⟨a⟩) (assume ⟨a⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_plift {α : Sort u} : nonempty (plift α) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, ⟨a⟩) (assume ⟨a⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty.forall {α : Sort u} {p : nonempty α → Prop} :
(∀h:nonempty α, p h) ↔ (∀a, p ⟨a⟩) :=
iff.intro (assume h a, h _) (assume h ⟨a⟩, h _)
@[simp] lemma nonempty.exists {α : Sort u} {p : nonempty α → Prop} :
(∃h:nonempty α, p h) ↔ (∃a, p ⟨a⟩) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩, ⟨a, h⟩) (assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩)
lemma classical.nonempty_pi {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} :
nonempty (Πa:α, β a) ↔ (∀a:α, nonempty (β a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨f⟩ a, ⟨f a⟩) (assume f, ⟨assume a, classical.choice $ f a⟩)
/-- Using `classical.choice`, lifts a (`Prop`-valued) `nonempty` instance to a (`Type`-valued)
`inhabited` instance. `classical.inhabited_of_nonempty` already exists, in
`core/init/classical.lean`, but the assumption is not a type class argument,
which makes it unsuitable for some applications. -/
noncomputable def classical.inhabited_of_nonempty' {α : Sort u} [h : nonempty α] : inhabited α :=
⟨classical.choice h⟩
/-- Using `classical.choice`, extracts a term from a `nonempty` type. -/
@[reducible] protected noncomputable def nonempty.some {α : Sort u} (h : nonempty α) : α :=
classical.choice h
/-- Using `classical.choice`, extracts a term from a `nonempty` type. -/
@[reducible] protected noncomputable def classical.arbitrary (α : Sort u) [h : nonempty α] : α :=
classical.choice h
/-- Given `f : α → β`, if `α` is nonempty then `β` is also nonempty.
`nonempty` cannot be a `functor`, because `functor` is restricted to `Type`. -/
lemma nonempty.map {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (f : α → β) : nonempty α → nonempty β
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨f h⟩
protected lemma nonempty.map2 {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) : nonempty α → nonempty β → nonempty γ
| ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ := ⟨f x y⟩
protected lemma nonempty.congr {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :
nonempty α ↔ nonempty β :=
⟨nonempty.map f, nonempty.map g⟩
lemma nonempty.elim_to_inhabited {α : Sort*} [h : nonempty α] {p : Prop}
(f : inhabited α → p) : p :=
h.elim $ f ∘ inhabited.mk
instance {α β} [h : nonempty α] [h2 : nonempty β] : nonempty (α × β) :=
h.elim $ λ g, h2.elim $ λ g2, ⟨⟨g, g2⟩⟩
end nonempty
lemma subsingleton_of_not_nonempty {α : Sort*} (h : ¬ nonempty α) : subsingleton α :=
⟨λ x, false.elim $ not_nonempty_iff_imp_false.mp h x⟩
section ite
/-- A `dite` whose results do not actually depend on the condition may be reduced to an `ite`. -/
@[simp]
lemma dite_eq_ite (P : Prop) [decidable P] {α : Sort*} (x y : α) :
dite P (λ h, x) (λ h, y) = ite P x y := rfl
/-- A function applied to a `dite` is a `dite` of that function applied to each of the branches. -/
lemma apply_dite {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : P → α) (y : ¬P → α) :
f (dite P x y) = dite P (λ h, f (x h)) (λ h, f (y h)) :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h] }
/-- A function applied to a `ite` is a `ite` of that function applied to each of the branches. -/
lemma apply_ite {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x y : α) :
f (ite P x y) = ite P (f x) (f y) :=
apply_dite f P (λ _, x) (λ _, y)
/-- A two-argument function applied to two `dite`s is a `dite` of that two-argument function
applied to each of the branches. -/
lemma apply_dite2 {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a : P → α)
(b : ¬P → α) (c : P → β) (d : ¬P → β) :
f (dite P a b) (dite P c d) = dite P (λ h, f (a h) (c h)) (λ h, f (b h) (d h)) :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h] }
/-- A two-argument function applied to two `ite`s is a `ite` of that two-argument function
applied to each of the branches. -/
lemma apply_ite2 {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a b : α) (c d : β) :
f (ite P a b) (ite P c d) = ite P (f a c) (f b d) :=
apply_dite2 f P (λ _, a) (λ _, b) (λ _, c) (λ _, d)
/-- A 'dite' producing a `Pi` type `Π a, β a`, applied to a value `x : α`
is a `dite` that applies either branch to `x`. -/
lemma dite_apply {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} (P : Prop) [decidable P]
(f : P → Π a, β a) (g : ¬ P → Π a, β a) (x : α) :
(dite P f g) x = dite P (λ h, f h x) (λ h, g h x) :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h] }
/-- A 'ite' producing a `Pi` type `Π a, β a`, applied to a value `x : α`
is a `ite` that applies either branch to `x` -/
lemma ite_apply {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} (P : Prop) [decidable P]
(f g : Π a, β a) (x : α) :
(ite P f g) x = ite P (f x) (g x) :=
dite_apply P (λ _, f) (λ _, g) x
/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `dite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
@[simp] lemma dite_not {α : Sort*} (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : ¬ P → α) (y : ¬¬ P → α) :
dite (¬ P) x y = dite P (λ h, y (not_not_intro h)) x :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h] }
/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `ite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
@[simp] lemma ite_not {α : Sort*} (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x y : α) :
ite (¬ P) x y = ite P y x :=
dite_not P (λ _, x) (λ _, y)
lemma ite_and {α} {p q : Prop} [decidable p] [decidable q] {x y : α} :
ite (p ∧ q) x y = ite p (ite q x y) y :=
by { by_cases hp : p; by_cases hq : q; simp [hp, hq] }
end ite
|
af8a72f878d3a4962f5c04cc1e7063e8b6ce8da8 | 453dcd7c0d1ef170b0843a81d7d8caedc9741dce | /logic/basic.lean | a9dc17eef41891d9a9312a0cf210be205038fe2a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | amswerdlow/mathlib | 9af77a1f08486d8fa059448ae2d97795bd12ec0c | 27f96e30b9c9bf518341705c99d641c38638dfd0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,200,953,598 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 144,564,700 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,534,156,197,000 | 1,534,156,197,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,601 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace "decidable".
Classical versions are in the namespace "classical".
Note: in the presence of automation, this whole file may be unnecessary. On the other hand,
maybe it is useful for writing automation.
-/
import data.prod tactic.cache
/-
miscellany
TODO: move elsewhere
-/
section miscellany
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
def empty.elim {C : Sort*} : empty → C.
instance : subsingleton empty := ⟨λa, a.elim⟩
instance : decidable_eq empty := λa, a.elim
@[priority 0] instance decidable_eq_of_subsingleton
{α} [subsingleton α] : decidable_eq α
| a b := is_true (subsingleton.elim a b)
/- Add an instance to "undo" coercion transitivity into a chain of coercions, because
most simp lemmas are stated with respect to simple coercions and will not match when
part of a chain. -/
@[simp] theorem coe_coe {α β γ} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_t β γ]
(a : α) : (a : γ) = (a : β) := rfl
end miscellany
/-
propositional connectives
-/
@[simp] theorem false_ne_true : false ≠ true
| h := h.symm ▸ trivial
section propositional
variables {a b c d : Prop}
/- implies -/
theorem iff_of_eq (e : a = b) : a ↔ b := e ▸ iff.rfl
theorem iff_iff_eq : (a ↔ b) ↔ a = b := ⟨propext, iff_of_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem imp_self : (a → a) ↔ true := iff_true_intro id
theorem imp_intro {α β} (h : α) (h₂ : β) : α := h
theorem imp_false : (a → false) ↔ ¬ a := iff.rfl
theorem imp_and_distrib {α} : (α → b ∧ c) ↔ (α → b) ∧ (α → c) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ ha, (h ha).left, λ ha, (h ha).right⟩,
λ h ha, ⟨h.left ha, h.right ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem and_imp : (a ∧ b → c) ↔ (a → b → c) :=
iff.intro (λ h ha hb, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) (λ h ⟨ha, hb⟩, h ha hb)
theorem iff_def : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (b → a) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _
theorem iff_def' : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b → a) ∧ (a → b) :=
iff_def.trans and.comm
@[simp] theorem imp_true_iff {α : Sort*} : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ_, trivial
@[simp] theorem imp_iff_right (ha : a) : (a → b) ↔ b :=
⟨λf, f ha, imp_intro⟩
/- not -/
theorem not.elim {α : Sort*} (H1 : ¬a) (H2 : a) : α := absurd H2 H1
@[reducible] theorem not.imp {a b : Prop} (H2 : ¬b) (H1 : a → b) : ¬a := mt H1 H2
theorem not_not_of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → ¬¬a :=
mt not.elim
theorem not_of_not_imp {α} : ¬(α → b) → ¬b :=
mt imp_intro
theorem dec_em (p : Prop) [decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p := decidable.em p
theorem by_contradiction {p} [decidable p] : (¬p → false) → p :=
decidable.by_contradiction
@[simp] theorem not_not [decidable a] : ¬¬a ↔ a :=
iff.intro by_contradiction not_not_intro
theorem of_not_not [decidable a] : ¬¬a → a :=
by_contradiction
theorem of_not_imp [decidable a] (h : ¬ (a → b)) : a :=
by_contradiction (not_not_of_not_imp h)
theorem not.imp_symm [decidable a] (h : ¬a → b) (hb : ¬b) : a :=
by_contradiction $ hb ∘ h
theorem not_imp_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬a → b) ↔ (¬b → a) :=
⟨not.imp_symm, not.imp_symm⟩
theorem imp.swap : (a → b → c) ↔ (b → a → c) :=
⟨function.swap, function.swap⟩
theorem imp_not_comm : (a → ¬b) ↔ (b → ¬a) :=
imp.swap
/- and -/
theorem not_and_of_not_left (b : Prop) : ¬a → ¬(a ∧ b) :=
mt and.left
theorem not_and_of_not_right (a : Prop) {b : Prop} : ¬b → ¬(a ∧ b) :=
mt and.right
theorem and.imp_left (h : a → b) : a ∧ c → b ∧ c :=
and.imp h id
theorem and.imp_right (h : a → b) : c ∧ a → c ∧ b :=
and.imp id h
lemma and.right_comm : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∧ b :=
by simp [and.left_comm, and.comm]
lemma and.rotate : a ∧ b ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c ∧ a :=
by simp [and.left_comm, and.comm]
theorem and_not_self_iff (a : Prop) : a ∧ ¬ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume h, (h.right) (h.left)) (assume h, h.elim)
theorem not_and_self_iff (a : Prop) : ¬ a ∧ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨hna, ha⟩, hna ha) false.elim
theorem and_iff_left_of_imp {a b : Prop} (h : a → b) : (a ∧ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (λ ha, ⟨ha, h ha⟩)
theorem and_iff_right_of_imp {a b : Prop} (h : b → a) : (a ∧ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro and.right (λ hb, ⟨h hb, hb⟩)
lemma and.congr_right_iff : (a ∧ b ↔ a ∧ c) ↔ (a → (b ↔ c)) :=
⟨λ h ha, by simp [ha] at h; exact h, and_congr_right⟩
/- or -/
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_of_imp (h₁ : a ∨ b) (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → d) : c ∨ d :=
or.imp h₂ h₃ h₁
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_left (h₁ : a ∨ c) (h : a → b) : b ∨ c :=
or.imp_left h h₁
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_right (h₁ : c ∨ a) (h : a → b) : c ∨ b :=
or.imp_right h h₁
theorem or.elim3 (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
or.elim h ha (assume h₂, or.elim h₂ hb hc)
theorem or_imp_distrib : (a ∨ b → c) ↔ (a → c) ∧ (b → c) :=
⟨assume h, ⟨assume ha, h (or.inl ha), assume hb, h (or.inr hb)⟩,
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, or.rec ha hb⟩
theorem or_iff_not_imp_left [decidable a] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ a → b) :=
⟨or.resolve_left, λ h, dite _ or.inl (or.inr ∘ h)⟩
theorem or_iff_not_imp_right [decidable b] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ b → a) :=
or.comm.trans or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem not_imp_not [decidable a] : (¬ a → ¬ b) ↔ (b → a) :=
⟨assume h hb, by_contradiction $ assume na, h na hb, mt⟩
/- distributivity -/
theorem and_or_distrib_left : a ∧ (b ∨ c) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (a ∧ c) :=
⟨λ ⟨ha, hbc⟩, hbc.imp (and.intro ha) (and.intro ha),
or.rec (and.imp_right or.inl) (and.imp_right or.inr)⟩
theorem or_and_distrib_right : (a ∨ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∨ (b ∧ c) :=
(and.comm.trans and_or_distrib_left).trans (or_congr and.comm and.comm)
theorem or_and_distrib_left : a ∨ (b ∧ c) ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ c) :=
⟨or.rec (λha, and.intro (or.inl ha) (or.inl ha)) (and.imp or.inr or.inr),
and.rec $ or.rec (imp_intro ∘ or.inl) (or.imp_right ∘ and.intro)⟩
theorem and_or_distrib_right : (a ∧ b) ∨ c ↔ (a ∨ c) ∧ (b ∨ c) :=
(or.comm.trans or_and_distrib_left).trans (and_congr or.comm or.comm)
/- iff -/
theorem iff_of_true (ha : a) (hb : b) : a ↔ b :=
⟨λ_, hb, λ _, ha⟩
theorem iff_of_false (ha : ¬a) (hb : ¬b) : a ↔ b :=
⟨ha.elim, hb.elim⟩
theorem iff_true_left (ha : a) : (a ↔ b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ h, h.1 ha, iff_of_true ha⟩
theorem iff_true_right (ha : a) : (b ↔ a) ↔ b :=
iff.comm.trans (iff_true_left ha)
theorem iff_false_left (ha : ¬a) : (a ↔ b) ↔ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, mt h.2 ha, iff_of_false ha⟩
theorem iff_false_right (ha : ¬a) : (b ↔ a) ↔ ¬b :=
iff.comm.trans (iff_false_left ha)
theorem not_or_of_imp [decidable a] (h : a → b) : ¬ a ∨ b :=
if ha : a then or.inr (h ha) else or.inl ha
theorem imp_iff_not_or [decidable a] : (a → b) ↔ (¬ a ∨ b) :=
⟨not_or_of_imp, or.neg_resolve_left⟩
theorem imp_or_distrib [decidable a] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
by simp [imp_iff_not_or, or.comm, or.left_comm]
theorem imp_or_distrib' [decidable b] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
by by_cases b; simp [h, or_iff_right_of_imp ((∘) false.elim)]
theorem not_imp_of_and_not : a ∧ ¬ b → ¬ (a → b)
| ⟨ha, hb⟩ h := hb $ h ha
@[simp] theorem not_imp [decidable a] : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨of_not_imp h, not_of_not_imp h⟩, not_imp_of_and_not⟩
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) [decidable a] : ((a → b) → a) → a :=
if ha : a then λ h, ha else λ h, h ha.elim
theorem peirce' {a : Prop} (H : ∀ b : Prop, (a → b) → a) : a := H _ id
theorem not_iff_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬ a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (a ↔ b) :=
by rw [@iff_def (¬ a), @iff_def' a]; exact and_congr not_imp_not not_imp_not
theorem not_iff_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬ a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ b ↔ a) :=
by rw [@iff_def (¬ a), @iff_def (¬ b)]; exact and_congr not_imp_comm imp_not_comm
theorem not_iff [decidable a] [decidable b] : ¬ (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ a ↔ b) :=
by split; intro h; [split, skip]; intro h'; [by_contradiction,intro,skip];
try { refine h _; simp [*] }; rw [h',not_iff_self] at h; exact h
theorem iff_not_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬ a) :=
by rw [@iff_def a, @iff_def b]; exact and_congr imp_not_comm not_imp_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not [decidable b] : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (¬ a ∧ ¬ b) :=
by { split; intro h,
{ rw h; by_cases b; [left,right]; split; assumption },
{ cases h with h h; cases h; split; intro; { contradiction <|> assumption } } }
@[simp] theorem not_and_not_right [decidable b] : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ (a → b) :=
⟨λ h ha, h.imp_symm $ and.intro ha, λ h ⟨ha, hb⟩, hb $ h ha⟩
@[inline] def decidable_of_iff (a : Prop) (h : a ↔ b) [D : decidable a] : decidable b :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff D h
@[inline] def decidable_of_iff' (b : Prop) (h : a ↔ b) [D : decidable b] : decidable a :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff D h.symm
def decidable_of_bool : ∀ (b : bool) (h : b ↔ a), decidable a
| tt h := is_true (h.1 rfl)
| ff h := is_false (mt h.2 bool.ff_ne_tt)
/- de morgan's laws -/
theorem not_and_of_not_or_not (h : ¬ a ∨ ¬ b) : ¬ (a ∧ b)
| ⟨ha, hb⟩ := or.elim h (absurd ha) (absurd hb)
theorem not_and_distrib [decidable a] : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, if ha : a then or.inr (λ hb, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) else or.inl ha, not_and_of_not_or_not⟩
theorem not_and_distrib' [decidable b] : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, if hb : b then or.inl (λ ha, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) else or.inr hb, not_and_of_not_or_not⟩
@[simp] theorem not_and : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ (a → ¬ b) := and_imp
theorem not_and' : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ b → ¬a :=
not_and.trans imp_not_comm
theorem not_or_distrib : ¬ (a ∨ b) ↔ ¬ a ∧ ¬ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ ha, h (or.inl ha), λ hb, h (or.inr hb)⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h, or.elim h h₁ h₂⟩
theorem or_iff_not_and_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : a ∨ b ↔ ¬ (¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
by rw [← not_or_distrib, not_not]
theorem and_iff_not_or_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : a ∧ b ↔ ¬ (¬ a ∨ ¬ b) :=
by rw [← not_and_distrib, not_not]
end propositional
/- equality -/
section equality
variables {α : Sort*} {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem heq_iff_eq : a == b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_heq, heq_of_eq⟩
theorem proof_irrel_heq {p q : Prop} (e : p = q) (hp : p) (hq : q) : hp == hq :=
by subst q; refl
theorem ne_of_mem_of_not_mem {α β} [has_mem α β] {s : β} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ s) : b ∉ s → a ≠ b :=
mt $ λ e, e ▸ h
theorem eq_equivalence : equivalence (@eq α) :=
⟨eq.refl, @eq.symm _, @eq.trans _⟩
lemma heq_of_eq_mp :
∀ {α β : Sort*} {a : α} {a' : β} (e : α = β) (h₂ : (eq.mp e a) = a'), a == a'
| α ._ a a' rfl h := eq.rec_on h (heq.refl _)
end equality
/-
quantifiers
-/
section quantifiers
variables {α : Sort*} {p q : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
def Exists.imp := @exists_imp_exists
theorem forall_swap {α β} {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨function.swap, function.swap⟩
theorem exists_swap {α β} {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨λ ⟨x, y, h⟩, ⟨y, x, h⟩, λ ⟨y, x, h⟩, ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_imp_distrib : ((∃ x, p x) → b) ↔ ∀ x, p x → b :=
⟨λ h x hpx, h ⟨x, hpx⟩, λ h ⟨x, hpx⟩, h x hpx⟩
--theorem forall_not_of_not_exists (h : ¬ ∃ x, p x) : ∀ x, ¬ p x :=
--forall_imp_of_exists_imp h
theorem not_exists_of_forall_not (h : ∀ x, ¬ p x) : ¬ ∃ x, p x :=
exists_imp_distrib.2 h
@[simp] theorem not_exists : (¬ ∃ x, p x) ↔ ∀ x, ¬ p x :=
exists_imp_distrib
theorem not_forall_of_exists_not : (∃ x, ¬ p x) → ¬ ∀ x, p x
| ⟨x, hn⟩ h := hn (h x)
theorem not_forall {p : α → Prop}
[decidable (∃ x, ¬ p x)] [∀ x, decidable (p x)] :
(¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬ p x :=
⟨not.imp_symm $ λ nx x, nx.imp_symm $ λ h, ⟨x, h⟩,
not_forall_of_exists_not⟩
@[simp] theorem not_forall_not [decidable (∃ x, p x)] :
(¬ ∀ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
by haveI := decidable_of_iff (¬ ∃ x, p x) not_exists;
exact not_iff_comm.1 not_exists
@[simp] theorem not_exists_not [∀ x, decidable (p x)] :
(¬ ∃ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem forall_true_iff : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ _, trivial)
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ true) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ _, of_iff_true (h _))
@[simp] theorem forall_2_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → true) ↔ true :=
forall_true_iff' $ λ _, forall_true_iff
@[simp] theorem forall_3_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : Π a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ a (b : β a), γ a b → true) ↔ true :=
forall_true_iff' $ λ _, forall_2_true_iff
@[simp] theorem forall_const (α : Sort*) [inhabited α] : (α → b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ h, h (arbitrary α), λ hb x, hb⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_const (α : Sort*) [inhabited α] : (∃ x : α, b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ ⟨x, h⟩, h, λ h, ⟨arbitrary α, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_and_distrib : (∀ x, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ (∀ x, q x) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ x, (h x).left, λ x, (h x).right⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ x, ⟨h₁ x, h₂ x⟩⟩
theorem exists_or_distrib : (∃ x, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∨ (∃ x, q x) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hpq⟩, hpq.elim (λ hpx, or.inl ⟨x, hpx⟩) (λ hqx, or.inr ⟨x, hqx⟩),
λ hepq, hepq.elim (λ ⟨x, hpx⟩, ⟨x, or.inl hpx⟩) (λ ⟨x, hqx⟩, ⟨x, or.inr hqx⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_and_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃x, q ∧ p x) ↔ q ∧ (∃x, p x) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hq, hp⟩, ⟨hq, x, hp⟩, λ ⟨hq, x, hp⟩, ⟨x, hq, hp⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_and_distrib_right {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃x, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃x, p x) ∧ q :=
by simp [and_comm]
@[simp] theorem forall_eq {a' : α} : (∀a, a = a' → p a) ↔ p a' :=
⟨λ h, h a' rfl, λ h a e, e.symm ▸ h⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq {a' : α} : ∃ a, a = a' := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left {a' : α} : (∃ a, a = a' ∧ p a) ↔ p a' :=
⟨λ ⟨a, e, h⟩, e ▸ h, λ h, ⟨_, rfl, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right {a' : α} : (∃ a, p a ∧ a = a') ↔ p a' :=
(exists_congr $ by exact λ a, and.comm).trans exists_eq_left
@[simp] theorem forall_eq' {a' : α} : (∀a, a' = a → p a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left' {a' : α} : (∃ a, a' = a ∧ p a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right' {a' : α} : (∃ a, p a ∧ a' = a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall (h : b ∨ ∀x, p x) (x) : b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right $ λ h₂, h₂ x
theorem forall_or_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [decidable q] :
(∀x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ (∀x, p x) :=
⟨λ h, if hq : q then or.inl hq else or.inr $ λ x, (h x).resolve_left hq,
forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_prop {p q : Prop} : (∃ h : p, q) ↔ p ∧ q :=
⟨λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_false : ¬ (∃a:α, false) := assume ⟨a, h⟩, h
theorem Exists.fst {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ := h
theorem Exists.snd {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ := h
@[simp] theorem forall_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∀ h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@forall_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∃ h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@exists_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (hn : ¬ p) : (∀ h' : p, q h') ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ h, hn.elim h
@[simp] theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬ p → ¬ (∃ h' : p, q h') :=
mt Exists.fst
end quantifiers
/- classical versions -/
namespace classical
variables {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
protected theorem not_forall : (¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ (∃ x, ¬ p x) := not_forall
protected theorem forall_or_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ (∀x, p x) :=
forall_or_distrib_left
theorem cases {p : Prop → Prop} (h1 : p true) (h2 : p false) : ∀a, p a :=
assume a, cases_on a h1 h2
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬ p :=
by_cases or.inl or.inr
protected theorem or_iff_not_imp_left {p q : Prop} : p ∨ q ↔ (¬ p → q) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left
protected theorem or_iff_not_imp_right {p q : Prop} : q ∨ p ↔ (¬ p → q) :=
or_iff_not_imp_right
/- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open -/
noncomputable theorem dec (p : Prop) : decidable p := by apply_instance
noncomputable theorem dec_pred (p : α → Prop) : decidable_pred p := by apply_instance
noncomputable theorem dec_rel (p : α → α → Prop) : decidable_rel p := by apply_instance
noncomputable theorem dec_eq (α : Sort*) : decidable_eq α := by apply_instance
@[elab_as_eliminator]
noncomputable def {u} rec_on {C : Sort u} (h : ∃ a, p a) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
H (classical.some h) (classical.some_spec h)
end classical
/-
bounded quantifiers
-/
section bounded_quantifiers
variables {α : Sort*} {r p q : α → Prop} {P Q : ∀ x, p x → Prop} {b : Prop}
theorem bex_def : (∃ x (h : p x), q x) ↔ ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨λ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, ⟨x, px, qx⟩, λ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, ⟨x, px, qx⟩⟩
theorem bex.elim {b : Prop} : (∃ x h, P x h) → (∀ a h, P a h → b) → b
| ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩ h' := h' a h₁ h₂
theorem bex.intro (a : α) (h₁ : p a) (h₂ : P a h₁) : ∃ x (h : p x), P x h :=
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ball_congr (H : ∀ x h, P x h ↔ Q x h) :
(∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∀ x h, Q x h) :=
forall_congr $ λ x, forall_congr (H x)
theorem bex_congr (H : ∀ x h, P x h ↔ Q x h) :
(∃ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, Q x h) :=
exists_congr $ λ x, exists_congr (H x)
theorem ball.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, (P x h → Q x h))
(h₁ : ∀ x h, P x h) (x h) : Q x h :=
H _ _ $ h₁ _ _
theorem bex.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, (P x h → Q x h)) :
(∃ x h, P x h) → ∃ x h, Q x h
| ⟨x, h, h'⟩ := ⟨_, _, H _ _ h'⟩
theorem ball.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x)
(h₁ : ∀ x, q x → r x) (x) (h : p x) : r x :=
h₁ _ $ H _ h
theorem bex.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(∃ x (_ : p x), r x) → ∃ x (_ : q x), r x
| ⟨x, hp, hr⟩ := ⟨x, H _ hp, hr⟩
theorem ball_of_forall (h : ∀ x, p x) (x) (_ : q x) : p x :=
h x
theorem forall_of_ball (H : ∀ x, p x) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) (x) : q x :=
h x $ H x
theorem bex_of_exists (H : ∀ x, p x) : (∃ x, q x) → ∃ x (_ : p x), q x
| ⟨x, hq⟩ := ⟨x, H x, hq⟩
theorem exists_of_bex : (∃ x (_ : p x), q x) → ∃ x, q x
| ⟨x, _, hq⟩ := ⟨x, hq⟩
@[simp] theorem bex_imp_distrib : ((∃ x h, P x h) → b) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h → b) :=
by simp
theorem not_bex : (¬ ∃ x h, P x h) ↔ ∀ x h, ¬ P x h :=
bex_imp_distrib
theorem not_ball_of_bex_not : (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) → ¬ ∀ x h, P x h
| ⟨x, h, hp⟩ al := hp $ al x h
theorem not_ball [decidable (∃ x h, ¬ P x h)] [∀ x h, decidable (P x h)] :
(¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) :=
⟨not.imp_symm $ λ nx x h, nx.imp_symm $ λ h', ⟨x, h, h'⟩,
not_ball_of_bex_not⟩
theorem ball_true_iff (p : α → Prop) : (∀ x, p x → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ h hrx, trivial)
theorem ball_and_distrib : (∀ x h, P x h ∧ Q x h) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h) ∧ (∀ x h, Q x h) :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ x, forall_and_distrib) forall_and_distrib
theorem bex_or_distrib : (∃ x h, P x h ∨ Q x h) ↔ (∃ x h, P x h) ∨ (∃ x h, Q x h) :=
iff.trans (exists_congr $ λ x, exists_or_distrib) exists_or_distrib
end bounded_quantifiers
namespace classical
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
theorem not_ball {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {P : Π (x : α), p x → Prop} :
(¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) := _root_.not_ball
end classical
section nonempty
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : α → Type w}
attribute [simp] nonempty_of_inhabited
lemma exists_true_iff_nonempty {α : Sort*} : (∃a:α, true) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (λ⟨a, _⟩, ⟨a⟩) (λ⟨a⟩, ⟨a, trivial⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Prop {p : Prop} : nonempty p ↔ p :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨h⟩, h) (assume h, ⟨h⟩)
lemma not_nonempty_iff_imp_false {p : Prop} : ¬ nonempty α ↔ α → false :=
⟨λ h a, h ⟨a⟩, λ h ⟨a⟩, h a⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_sigma : nonempty (Σa:α, γ a) ↔ (∃a:α, nonempty (γ a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩) (assume ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_subtype {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : nonempty (subtype p) ↔ (∃a:α, p a) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, ⟨a, h⟩) (assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_prod : nonempty (α × β) ↔ (nonempty α ∧ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩) (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_pprod {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} :
nonempty (pprod α β) ↔ (nonempty α ∧ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩) (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_sum : nonempty (α ⊕ β) ↔ (nonempty α ∨ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨h⟩, match h with sum.inl a := or.inl ⟨a⟩ | sum.inr b := or.inr ⟨b⟩ end)
(assume h, match h with or.inl ⟨a⟩ := ⟨sum.inl a⟩ | or.inr ⟨b⟩ := ⟨sum.inr b⟩ end)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_psum {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} :
nonempty (psum α β) ↔ (nonempty α ∨ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨h⟩, match h with psum.inl a := or.inl ⟨a⟩ | psum.inr b := or.inr ⟨b⟩ end)
(assume h, match h with or.inl ⟨a⟩ := ⟨psum.inl a⟩ | or.inr ⟨b⟩ := ⟨psum.inr b⟩ end)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_psigma {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} :
nonempty (psigma β) ↔ (∃a:α, nonempty (β a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩) (assume ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_empty : ¬ nonempty empty :=
assume ⟨h⟩, h.elim
@[simp] lemma nonempty_ulift : nonempty (ulift α) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, ⟨a⟩) (assume ⟨a⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_plift {α : Sort u} : nonempty (plift α) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, ⟨a⟩) (assume ⟨a⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty.forall {α : Sort u} {p : nonempty α → Prop} :
(∀h:nonempty α, p h) ↔ (∀a, p ⟨a⟩) :=
iff.intro (assume h a, h _) (assume h ⟨a⟩, h _)
@[simp] lemma nonempty.exists {α : Sort u} {p : nonempty α → Prop} :
(∃h:nonempty α, p h) ↔ (∃a, p ⟨a⟩) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩, ⟨a, h⟩) (assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩)
lemma classical.nonempty_pi {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} :
nonempty (Πa:α, β a) ↔ (∀a:α, nonempty (β a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨f⟩ a, ⟨f a⟩) (assume f, ⟨assume a, classical.choice $ f a⟩)
end nonempty
|
a6531993232844a3b9cca76f2469310836911408 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/topology/list.lean | 0ca329ac5ae15c6ec39eba2b48a3f1888351f777 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,486 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Topology on lists and vectors.
-/
import topology.constructions
open topological_space set filter
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
instance [topological_space α] : topological_space (list α) :=
topological_space.mk_of_nhds (traverse nhds)
lemma nhds_list [topological_space α] (as : list α) : 𝓝 as = traverse 𝓝 as :=
begin
refine nhds_mk_of_nhds _ _ _ _,
{ assume l, induction l,
case list.nil { exact le_refl _ },
case list.cons : a l ih {
suffices : list.cons <$> pure a <*> pure l ≤ list.cons <$> 𝓝 a <*> traverse 𝓝 l,
{ simpa only [-filter.pure_def] with functor_norm using this },
exact filter.seq_mono (filter.map_mono $ pure_le_nhds a) ih } },
{ assume l s hs,
rcases (mem_traverse_sets_iff _ _).1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hus⟩, clear as hs,
have : ∃v:list (set α), l.forall₂ (λa s, is_open s ∧ a ∈ s) v ∧ sequence v ⊆ s,
{ induction hu generalizing s,
case list.forall₂.nil : hs this { existsi [], simpa only [list.forall₂_nil_left_iff, exists_eq_left] },
case list.forall₂.cons : a s as ss ht h ih t hts {
rcases mem_nhds_sets_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hut, hu⟩,
rcases ih (subset.refl _) with ⟨v, hv, hvss⟩,
exact ⟨u::v, list.forall₂.cons hu hv,
subset.trans (set.seq_mono (set.image_subset _ hut) hvss) hts⟩ } },
rcases this with ⟨v, hv, hvs⟩,
refine ⟨sequence v, mem_traverse_sets _ _ _, hvs, _⟩,
{ exact hv.imp (assume a s ⟨hs, ha⟩, mem_nhds_sets hs ha) },
{ assume u hu,
have hu := (list.mem_traverse _ _).1 hu,
have : list.forall₂ (λa s, is_open s ∧ a ∈ s) u v,
{ refine list.forall₂.flip _,
replace hv := hv.flip,
simp only [list.forall₂_and_left, flip] at ⊢ hv,
exact ⟨hv.1, hu.flip⟩ },
refine mem_sets_of_superset _ hvs,
exact mem_traverse_sets _ _ (this.imp $ assume a s ⟨hs, ha⟩, mem_nhds_sets hs ha) } }
end
lemma nhds_nil [topological_space α] : 𝓝 ([] : list α) = pure [] :=
by rw [nhds_list, list.traverse_nil _]; apply_instance
lemma nhds_cons [topological_space α] (a : α) (l : list α) :
𝓝 (a :: l) = list.cons <$> 𝓝 a <*> 𝓝 l :=
by rw [nhds_list, list.traverse_cons _, ← nhds_list]; apply_instance
namespace list
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
lemma tendsto_cons' {a : α} {l : list α} :
tendsto (λp:α×list α, list.cons p.1 p.2) ((𝓝 a).prod (𝓝 l)) (𝓝 (a :: l)) :=
by rw [nhds_cons, tendsto, map_prod]; exact le_refl _
lemma tendsto_cons {α : Type*} {f : α → β} {g : α → list β}
{a : _root_.filter α} {b : β} {l : list β} (hf : tendsto f a (𝓝 b)) (hg : tendsto g a (𝓝 l)) :
tendsto (λa, list.cons (f a) (g a)) a (𝓝 (b :: l)) :=
tendsto_cons'.comp (tendsto.prod_mk hf hg)
lemma tendsto_cons_iff {β : Type*} {f : list α → β} {b : _root_.filter β} {a : α} {l : list α} :
tendsto f (𝓝 (a :: l)) b ↔ tendsto (λp:α×list α, f (p.1 :: p.2)) ((𝓝 a).prod (𝓝 l)) b :=
have 𝓝 (a :: l) = ((𝓝 a).prod (𝓝 l)).map (λp:α×list α, (p.1 :: p.2)),
begin
simp only
[nhds_cons, filter.prod_eq, (filter.map_def _ _).symm, (filter.seq_eq_filter_seq _ _).symm],
simp [-filter.seq_eq_filter_seq, -filter.map_def, (∘)] with functor_norm,
end,
by rw [this, filter.tendsto_map'_iff]
lemma tendsto_nhds {β : Type*} {f : list α → β} {r : list α → _root_.filter β}
(h_nil : tendsto f (pure []) (r []))
(h_cons : ∀l a, tendsto f (𝓝 l) (r l) → tendsto (λp:α×list α, f (p.1 :: p.2)) ((𝓝 a).prod (𝓝 l)) (r (a::l))) :
∀l, tendsto f (𝓝 l) (r l)
| [] := by rwa [nhds_nil]
| (a::l) := by rw [tendsto_cons_iff]; exact h_cons l a (tendsto_nhds l)
lemma continuous_at_length :
∀(l : list α), continuous_at list.length l :=
begin
simp only [continuous_at, nhds_discrete],
refine tendsto_nhds _ _,
{ exact tendsto_pure_pure _ _ },
{ assume l a ih,
dsimp only [list.length],
refine tendsto.comp (tendsto_pure_pure (λx, x + 1) _) _,
refine tendsto.comp ih tendsto_snd }
end
lemma tendsto_insert_nth' {a : α} : ∀{n : ℕ} {l : list α},
tendsto (λp:α×list α, insert_nth n p.1 p.2) ((𝓝 a).prod (𝓝 l)) (𝓝 (insert_nth n a l))
| 0 l := tendsto_cons'
| (n+1) [] :=
suffices tendsto (λa, []) (𝓝 a) (𝓝 ([] : list α)),
by simpa [nhds_nil, tendsto, map_prod, -filter.pure_def, (∘), insert_nth],
tendsto_const_nhds
| (n+1) (a'::l) :=
have (𝓝 a).prod (𝓝 (a' :: l)) =
((𝓝 a).prod ((𝓝 a').prod (𝓝 l))).map (λp:α×α×list α, (p.1, p.2.1 :: p.2.2)),
begin
simp only
[nhds_cons, filter.prod_eq, (filter.map_def _ _).symm, (filter.seq_eq_filter_seq _ _).symm],
simp [-filter.seq_eq_filter_seq, -filter.map_def, (∘)] with functor_norm
end,
begin
rw [this, tendsto_map'_iff],
exact tendsto_cons
(tendsto_fst.comp tendsto_snd)
((@tendsto_insert_nth' n l).comp (tendsto.prod_mk tendsto_fst (tendsto_snd.comp tendsto_snd)))
end
lemma tendsto_insert_nth {β : Type*} {n : ℕ} {a : α} {l : list α} {f : β → α} {g : β → list α}
{b : _root_.filter β} (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 l)) :
tendsto (λb:β, insert_nth n (f b) (g b)) b (𝓝 (insert_nth n a l)) :=
tendsto_insert_nth'.comp (tendsto.prod_mk hf hg)
lemma continuous_insert_nth {n : ℕ} : continuous (λp:α×list α, insert_nth n p.1 p.2) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $
assume ⟨a, l⟩, by rw [continuous_at, nhds_prod_eq]; exact tendsto_insert_nth'
lemma tendsto_remove_nth : ∀{n : ℕ} {l : list α},
tendsto (λl, remove_nth l n) (𝓝 l) (𝓝 (remove_nth l n))
| _ [] := by rw [nhds_nil]; exact tendsto_pure_nhds _ _
| 0 (a::l) := by rw [tendsto_cons_iff]; exact tendsto_snd
| (n+1) (a::l) :=
begin
rw [tendsto_cons_iff],
dsimp [remove_nth],
exact tendsto_cons tendsto_fst ((@tendsto_remove_nth n l).comp tendsto_snd)
end
lemma continuous_remove_nth {n : ℕ} : continuous (λl : list α, remove_nth l n) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume a, tendsto_remove_nth
end list
namespace vector
open list
instance (n : ℕ) [topological_space α] : topological_space (vector α n) :=
by unfold vector; apply_instance
lemma cons_val {n : ℕ} {a : α} : ∀{v : vector α n}, (a :: v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨l, hl⟩ := rfl
lemma tendsto_cons [topological_space α] {n : ℕ} {a : α} {l : vector α n}:
tendsto (λp:α×vector α n, vector.cons p.1 p.2) ((𝓝 a).prod (𝓝 l)) (𝓝 (a :: l)) :=
by
simp [tendsto_subtype_rng, cons_val];
exact tendsto_cons tendsto_fst (tendsto.comp continuous_at_subtype_val tendsto_snd)
lemma tendsto_insert_nth
[topological_space α] {n : ℕ} {i : fin (n+1)} {a:α} :
∀{l:vector α n}, tendsto (λp:α×vector α n, insert_nth p.1 i p.2)
((𝓝 a).prod (𝓝 l)) (𝓝 (insert_nth a i l))
| ⟨l, hl⟩ :=
begin
rw [insert_nth, tendsto_subtype_rng],
simp [insert_nth_val],
exact list.tendsto_insert_nth tendsto_fst (tendsto.comp continuous_at_subtype_val tendsto_snd : _)
end
lemma continuous_insert_nth' [topological_space α] {n : ℕ} {i : fin (n+1)} :
continuous (λp:α×vector α n, insert_nth p.1 i p.2) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume ⟨a, l⟩,
by rw [continuous_at, nhds_prod_eq]; exact tendsto_insert_nth
lemma continuous_insert_nth [topological_space α] [topological_space β] {n : ℕ} {i : fin (n+1)}
{f : β → α} {g : β → vector α n} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
continuous (λb, insert_nth (f b) i (g b)) :=
continuous_insert_nth'.comp (continuous.prod_mk hf hg)
lemma continuous_at_remove_nth [topological_space α] {n : ℕ} {i : fin (n+1)} :
∀{l:vector α (n+1)}, continuous_at (remove_nth i) l
| ⟨l, hl⟩ :=
-- ∀{l:vector α (n+1)}, tendsto (remove_nth i) (𝓝 l) (𝓝 (remove_nth i l))
--| ⟨l, hl⟩ :=
begin
rw [continuous_at, remove_nth, tendsto_subtype_rng],
simp [remove_nth_val],
exact tendsto.comp list.tendsto_remove_nth continuous_at_subtype_val
end
lemma continuous_remove_nth [topological_space α] {n : ℕ} {i : fin (n+1)} :
continuous (remove_nth i : vector α (n+1) → vector α n) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume ⟨a, l⟩, continuous_at_remove_nth
end vector
|
753a9adde86a827335f29c05945fd9b17a3e1a53 | 534c92d7322a8676cfd1583e26f5946134561b54 | /src/Exercises/01_Propositions/Q0105/S0005.lean | 94e59402a4d76fb50e58b8633564ed51d4e2ae77 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathematics-in-lean | 53f387174f04d6077f434e27c407aee9425837f7 | 3fad7bb7e888dabef94921101af8671b78a4304a | refs/heads/master | 1,586,812,457,439 | 1,546,893,744,000 | 1,546,893,744,000 | 163,450,734 | 8 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 111 | lean | theorem needs_intros (P Q R : Prop) (HR : R) : P → (Q → R) :=
begin
intro HP,
intro HQ,
exact HR
end
|
c288f3a2abfb4f990945184abd4eb0e4cc766e6d | ea6a4a10943d0b1966364cc23dbea151403b12cb | /src/tactic/refine.lean | b42e0a20e7d225f3afacaa1e1a2239fd10a2f344 | [] | no_license | cipher1024/transport | 4ec290275f540261dd6ae86247eecc99abe0218a | 147a1ba17c1e4c0b19b7625a1a70f87458a7f705 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,163,354,251 | 1,530,778,876,000 | 1,530,778,876,000 | 131,463,521 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,013 | lean | import data.dlist
import meta.expr
import tactic
import util.control.applicative
namespace expr
meta def is_mvar : expr → bool
| (expr.mvar _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
meta def list_meta_vars (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if expr.is_mvar e' ∧ ¬ e' ∈ es then e' :: es else es)
end expr
namespace tactic
open interactive interactive.types lean.parser
tactic.interactive (itactic)
tactic nat applicative
open functor function
meta def qualified_field_list (struct_n : name) : tactic (list name) :=
map (uncurry $ flip name.update_prefix) <$> expanded_field_list struct_n
namespace interactive
open functor
-- meta def refineS (e : parse texpr) (ph : parse $ optional $ tk "with" *> ident) : tactic unit :=
-- do str ← e.get_structure_instance_info,
-- tgt ← target,
-- let struct_n : name := tgt.get_app_fn.const_name,
-- exp_fields ← expanded_field_list struct_n,
-- -- let exp_fields' := exp_fields.map prod.snd,
-- let missing_f := exp_fields.filter (λ f, (f.2 : name) ∉ str.field_names),
-- let provided := exp_fields.filter (λ f, (f.2 : name) ∈ str.field_names),
-- vs ← mk_mvar_list missing_f.length,
-- e' ← to_expr $ pexpr.mk_structure_instance
-- { struct := some struct_n
-- , field_names := str.field_names ++ missing_f.map prod.snd
-- , field_values := str.field_values ++ vs.map to_pexpr },
-- tactic.exact e',
-- -- trace missing_f,
-- gs ← with_enable_tags (
-- mmap₂ (λ (n : name × name) v, do
-- set_goals [v],
-- try (interactive.unfold (provided.map $ λ ⟨s,f⟩, f.update_prefix s) (loc.ns [none])),
-- -- trace n,
-- apply_auto_param
-- <|> apply_opt_param
-- <|> (set_main_tag [`_field,n.2,n.1]),
-- get_goals)
-- missing_f vs),
-- set_goals gs.join,
-- return ()
-- meta def collect_tagged_goals (pre : name) : tactic (list expr) :=
-- do gs ← get_goals,
-- gs.mfoldr (λ g r, do
-- pre' :: t ← get_tag g,
-- if t = [pre] ∧ pre' = pre'.get_prefix <.> "_field"
-- then return (g::r)
-- else return r)
-- []
-- -- meta def match_field_tag
-- meta def field (tag : parse ident) (tac : itactic) : tactic unit :=
-- do ts ← collect_tagged_goals tag,
-- match ts with
-- | [] := fail format!"no field goal with tag {tag}"
-- | [g] := do
-- gs ← get_goals,
-- set_goals $ g :: gs.filter (≠ g),
-- solve1 tac
-- | _ := fail format!"multiple goals have tag {tag}"
-- end
-- meta def get_current_field : tactic name :=
-- do [_,field,str] ← get_main_tag,
-- -- trace format!"{field} - {str}",
-- expr.const_name <$> resolve_name (field.update_prefix str)
-- -- meta def current_field (t : name) (c : name := `current) : tactic unit :=
-- -- () <$ (get_current_field t >>= mk_const >>= pose c none)
end interactive
end tactic
|
f16f29e6eb8207fabae81c9cd5cf809128ac106d | 7c92a46ce39266c13607ecdef7f228688f237182 | /src/for_mathlib/open_embeddings.lean | 89f90f54e394627834c345f2b6b0be0cad3b25c6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | asym57/lean-perfectoid-spaces | 3217d01f6ddc0d13e9fb68651749469750420767 | 359187b429f254a946218af4411d45f08705c83e | refs/heads/master | 1,609,457,937,251 | 1,577,542,616,000 | 1,577,542,675,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 848 | lean | import topology.maps -- some stuff should go here
import topology.opens -- some stuff should go here
namespace topological_space
section is_open_map
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
(f : α → β)
def is_open_map.map (h : is_open_map f) : opens α → opens β :=
λ U, ⟨f '' U.1, h U.1 U.2⟩
def opens.map (U : opens α) : opens U → opens α :=
is_open_map.map subtype.val $ (subtype_val.open_embedding U.2).is_open_map
def opens.map_mono {U : opens α} {V W : opens U} (HVW : V ⊆ W) : opens.map U V ⊆ opens.map U W :=
λ x h, set.image_subset _ HVW h
def opens.map_mem_of_mem {U : opens α} {V : opens U} {x : U} (h : x ∈ V) : x.1 ∈ opens.map U V :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨v, hv⟩,
use v,
exact hv,
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
end
end is_open_map
end topological_space
|
3c80193391a88737fd327e7a807d0b755b919ec1 | 02005f45e00c7ecf2c8ca5db60251bd1e9c860b5 | /src/analysis/special_functions/pow.lean | b9674f4b05f8884f0deb485deae263b0f1c0c57c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anthony2698/mathlib | 03cd69fe5c280b0916f6df2d07c614c8e1efe890 | 407615e05814e98b24b2ff322b14e8e3eb5e5d67 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,792,774,873 | 1,614,371,563,000 | 1,614,371,563,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 60,194 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric
import analysis.calculus.extend_deriv
/-!
# Power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` and `y` are complex numbers,
* or `x` and `y` are real numbers,
* or `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* or `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical real topological_space nnreal ennreal
namespace complex
/-- The complex power function `x^y`, given by `x^y = exp(y log x)` (where `log` is the principal
determination of the logarithm), unless `x = 0` where one sets `0^0 = 1` and `0^y = 0` for
`y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def cpow (x y : ℂ) : ℂ :=
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y)
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℂ ℂ := ⟨cpow⟩
@[simp] lemma cpow_eq_pow (x y : ℂ) : cpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
lemma cpow_def (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) := rfl
@[simp] lemma cpow_zero (x : ℂ) : x ^ (0 : ℂ) = 1 := by simp [cpow_def]
@[simp] lemma cpow_eq_zero_iff (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
by { simp only [cpow_def], split_ifs; simp [*, exp_ne_zero] }
@[simp] lemma zero_cpow {x : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = 0 :=
by simp [cpow_def, *]
@[simp] lemma cpow_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (1 : ℂ) = x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx, cpow_def]
else by rw [cpow_def, if_neg (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℂ) ≠ 0), if_neg hx, mul_one, exp_log hx]
@[simp] lemma one_cpow (x : ℂ) : (1 : ℂ) ^ x = 1 :=
by rw cpow_def; split_ifs; simp [one_ne_zero, *] at *
lemma cpow_add {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
by simp [cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [*, exp_add, mul_add] at *
lemma cpow_mul {x y : ℂ} (z : ℂ) (h₁ : -π < (log x * y).im) (h₂ : (log x * y).im ≤ π) :
x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
begin
simp [cpow_def],
split_ifs;
simp [*, exp_ne_zero, log_exp h₁ h₂, mul_assoc] at *
end
lemma cpow_neg (x y : ℂ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
by simp [cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [exp_neg]
lemma cpow_neg_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (-1 : ℂ) = x⁻¹ :=
by simpa using cpow_neg x 1
@[simp] lemma cpow_nat_cast (x : ℂ) : ∀ (n : ℕ), x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := if hx : x = 0 then by simp only [hx, pow_succ,
complex.zero_cpow (nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (nat.succ_ne_zero _)), zero_mul]
else by simp [cpow_add, hx, pow_add, cpow_nat_cast n]
@[simp] lemma cpow_int_cast (x : ℂ) : ∀ (n : ℤ), x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n
| (n : ℕ) := by simp; refl
| -[1+ n] := by rw fpow_neg_succ_of_nat;
simp only [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, int.cast_neg, complex.cpow_neg, inv_eq_one_div,
int.cast_coe_nat, cpow_nat_cast]
lemma cpow_nat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) ^ n = x :=
have (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im = (log x).im / n,
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← of_real_nat_cast, ← of_real_inv, mul_im,
of_real_re, of_real_im]; simp,
have h : -π < (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im ∧ (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im ≤ π,
from (le_total (log x).im 0).elim
(λ h, ⟨calc -π < (log x).im : by simp [log, neg_pi_lt_arg]
... ≤ ((log x).im * 1) / n : (le_div_iff (nat.cast_pos.2 hn : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr
(mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left (by rw ← nat.cast_one; exact nat.cast_le.2 hn) h)
... = (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im : by simp [this],
this.symm ▸ le_trans (div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg h n.cast_nonneg)
(le_of_lt real.pi_pos)⟩)
(λ h, ⟨this.symm ▸ lt_of_lt_of_le (neg_neg_of_pos real.pi_pos)
(div_nonneg h n.cast_nonneg),
calc (log x * (↑n)⁻¹).im = (1 * (log x).im) / n : by simp [this]
... ≤ (log x).im : (div_le_iff' (nat.cast_pos.2 hn : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (by rw ← nat.cast_one; exact nat.cast_le.2 hn) h)
... ≤ _ : by simp [log, arg_le_pi]⟩),
by rw [← cpow_nat_cast, ← cpow_mul _ h.1 h.2,
inv_mul_cancel (show (n : ℂ) ≠ 0, from nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn)),
cpow_one]
end complex
lemma measurable.cpow {α : Type*} [measurable_space α] {f g : α → ℂ}
(hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) : measurable (λ x, f x ^ g x) :=
measurable.ite (hf $ measurable_set_singleton _)
(measurable_const.ite (hg $ measurable_set_singleton _) measurable_const)
(hf.clog.mul hg).cexp
namespace real
/-- The real power function `x^y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp(y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0^0=1` and `0^y=0` for `y ≠ 0`.
For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (πy)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) := ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
lemma rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
lemma rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) :=
by simp only [rpow_def, complex.cpow_def];
split_ifs;
simp [*, (complex.of_real_log hx).symm, -complex.of_real_mul, -is_R_or_C.of_real_mul,
(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, complex.exp_of_real_re] at *
lemma rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
lemma exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = (exp x) ^ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
by { simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx], split_ifs; simp [*, exp_ne_zero] }
open_locale real
lemma rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) :=
begin
rw [rpow_def, complex.cpow_def, if_neg],
have : complex.log x * y = ↑(log(-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * complex.I,
simp only [complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, complex.arg_of_real_of_neg hx,
complex.abs_of_real, complex.of_real_mul], ring,
{ rw [this, complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← complex.of_real_exp, ← complex.of_real_cos,
← complex.of_real_sin, mul_add, ← complex.of_real_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← complex.of_real_mul,
complex.add_re, complex.of_real_re, complex.mul_re, complex.I_re, complex.of_real_im,
real.log_neg_eq_log],
ring },
{ rw complex.of_real_eq_zero, exact ne_of_lt hx }
end
lemma rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y =
if x = 0
then if y = 0
then 1
else 0
else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) :=
by split_ifs; simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
lemma rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y :=
by rw rpow_def_of_pos hx; apply exp_pos
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 :=
by simp [rpow_def, *]
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
lemma zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 :=
by { by_cases h : x = 0; simp [h, zero_le_one] }
lemma zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x :=
by { by_cases h : x = 0; simp [h, zero_le_one] }
lemma rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx];
split_ifs; simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
lemma abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ y) ≤ abs (x) ^ y :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 x with (hx|rfl|hx),
{ rw [abs_of_pos hx, abs_of_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)] },
{ rw [abs_zero, abs_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg le_rfl _)] },
{ rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log,
abs_mul, abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)],
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _) }
end
end real
namespace complex
lemma of_real_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) :=
by simp [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs; simp [complex.of_real_log hx]
@[simp] lemma abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = x.abs ^ y :=
begin
rw [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg _), complex.cpow_def],
split_ifs;
simp [*, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (real.exp_pos _)), complex.log, complex.exp_add,
add_mul, mul_right_comm _ I, exp_mul_I, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I,
(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, -complex.of_real_mul, -is_R_or_C.of_real_mul] at *
end
@[simp] lemma abs_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : abs (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) = x.abs ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) :=
by rw ← abs_cpow_real; simp [-abs_cpow_real]
end complex
namespace real
variables {x y z : ℝ}
lemma rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
by simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
lemma rpow_add' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with H|pos,
{ simp only [← H, h, rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, true_and, zero_rpow, eq_self_iff_true, ne.def,
not_false_iff, zero_eq_mul],
by_contradiction F,
push_neg at F,
apply h,
simp [F] },
{ exact rpow_add pos _ _ }
end
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
lemma le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with H|pos,
{ by_cases h : y + z = 0,
{ simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero],
calc (0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
... = 1 : by simp },
{ simp [rpow_add', ← H, h] } },
{ simp [rpow_add pos] }
end
lemma rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
by rw [← complex.of_real_inj, complex.of_real_cpow (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg hx _),
complex.of_real_cpow hx, complex.of_real_mul, complex.cpow_mul, complex.of_real_cpow hx];
simp only [(complex.of_real_mul _ _).symm, (complex.of_real_log hx).symm,
complex.of_real_im, neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
lemma rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
by simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs; simp [*, exp_neg] at *
lemma rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) :
x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
by { simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢, simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv] }
@[simp] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
by simp only [rpow_def, (complex.of_real_pow _ _).symm, complex.cpow_nat_cast,
complex.of_real_nat_cast, complex.of_real_re]
@[simp] lemma rpow_int_cast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
by simp only [rpow_def, (complex.of_real_fpow _ _).symm, complex.cpow_int_cast,
complex.of_real_int_cast, complex.of_real_re]
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ :=
begin
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹, by exact_mod_cast H,
simp only [rpow_int_cast, fpow_one, fpow_neg],
end
lemma mul_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ y) : (x*y)^z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
iterate 3 { rw real.rpow_def_of_nonneg }, split_ifs; simp * at *,
{ have hx : 0 < x, cases lt_or_eq_of_le h with h₂ h₂, exact h₂, exfalso, apply h_2, exact eq.symm h₂,
have hy : 0 < y, cases lt_or_eq_of_le h₁ with h₂ h₂, exact h₂, exfalso, apply h_3, exact eq.symm h₂,
rw [log_mul (ne_of_gt hx) (ne_of_gt hy), add_mul, exp_add]},
{ exact h₁},
{ exact h},
{ exact mul_nonneg h h₁},
end
lemma inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : (x⁻¹)^y = (x^y)⁻¹ :=
begin
by_cases hy0 : y = 0, { simp [*] },
by_cases hx0 : x = 0, { simp [*] },
simp only [real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, real.rpow_def_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 hx), if_false,
hx0, mt inv_eq_zero.1 hx0, log_inv, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, exp_neg]
end
lemma div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x^z / y^z :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
lemma log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x^y) = y * (log x) :=
begin
apply exp_injective,
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y],
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
begin
rw le_iff_eq_or_lt at hx, cases hx,
{ rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)], exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa ← hx at hxy) _ },
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp],
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y z: ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
begin
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with rfl|h₁', { refl },
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with rfl|h₂', { simp },
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le $ λ h, rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), λ h, rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 $ rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x^y < x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]},
rw exp_lt_exp, exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx),
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)]},
rw exp_le_exp, exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hyz (log_nonneg hx),
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]},
rw exp_lt_exp, exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left hyz (log_neg hx0 hx1),
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
repeat {rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]},
rw exp_le_exp, exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hyz (log_nonpos (le_of_lt hx0) hx1),
end
lemma rpow_lt_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_lt_rpow hx1 hx2 hz }
lemma rpow_le_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_le_rpow hx1 hx2 hz }
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
by { convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
by { convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma one_lt_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_lt_rpow zero_le_one hx hz }
lemma one_le_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
by { rw ← one_rpow z, exact rpow_le_rpow zero_le_one hx hz }
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : z < 0) :
1 < x^z :=
by { convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx1 hx2 hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
1 ≤ x^z :=
by { convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx1 hx2 hz, exact (rpow_zero x).symm }
lemma rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_lt_one_iff, mul_neg_iff, log_pos_iff hx, log_neg_iff hx]
lemma rpow_lt_one_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y :=
begin
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl|hx),
{ rcases em (y = 0) with (rfl|hy); simp [*, lt_irrefl, zero_lt_one] },
{ simp [rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos hx, hx.ne.symm] }
end
lemma one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, one_lt_exp_iff, mul_pos_iff, log_pos_iff hx, log_neg_iff hx]
lemma one_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 < x ^ y ↔ 1 < x ∧ 0 < y ∨ 0 < x ∧ x < 1 ∧ y < 0 :=
begin
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl|hx),
{ rcases em (y = 0) with (rfl|hy); simp [*, lt_irrefl, (@zero_lt_one ℝ _ _).not_lt] },
{ simp [one_lt_rpow_iff_of_pos hx, hx] }
end
lemma rpow_le_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ x ∧ y ≤ 0 ∨ x ≤ 1 ∧ 0 ≤ y :=
by rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_le_one_iff, mul_nonpos_iff, log_nonneg_iff hx, log_nonpos_iff hx]
lemma pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x :=
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0, by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hn,
by rw [← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x :=
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0, by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hn,
by rw [← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel hn0, rpow_one]
section prove_rpow_is_continuous
lemma continuous_rpow_aux1 : continuous (λp : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.1}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
suffices h : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.1 }, exp (log p.val.1 * p.val.2)),
by { convert h, ext p, rw rpow_def_of_pos p.2 },
continuous_exp.comp $
(show continuous ((λp:{p:ℝ//0 < p}, log (p.val)) ∘ (λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ//0<p.fst}, ⟨p.val.1, p.2⟩)), from
continuous_log'.comp $ continuous_subtype_mk _ $ continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id)
lemma continuous_rpow_aux2 : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // p.1 < 0}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
suffices h : continuous (λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ // p.1 < 0}, exp (log (-p.val.1) * p.val.2) * cos (p.val.2 * π)),
by { convert h, ext p, rw [rpow_def_of_neg p.2, log_neg_eq_log] },
(continuous_exp.comp $
(show continuous $ (λp:{p:ℝ//0<p},
log (p.val))∘(λp:{p:ℝ×ℝ//p.1<0}, ⟨-p.val.1, neg_pos_of_neg p.2⟩),
from continuous_log'.comp $ continuous_subtype_mk _ $ continuous_neg.comp $
continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val).mul
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id)).mul
(continuous_cos.comp $
(continuous_snd.comp $ continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_id).mul continuous_const)
lemma continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
begin
cases lt_trichotomy 0 x,
exact continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux1 _ h)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert (is_open_lt' (0:ℝ)).prod is_open_univ, ext, finish }) h),
cases h,
{ exact absurd h.symm hx },
exact continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux2 _ h)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert (is_open_gt' (0:ℝ)).prod is_open_univ, ext, finish }) h)
end
lemma continuous_rpow_aux3 : continuous (λ p : {p:ℝ×ℝ // 0 < p.2}, p.val.1 ^ p.val.2) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ ⟨(x₀, y₀), hy₀⟩,
begin
by_cases hx₀ : x₀ = 0,
{ simp only [continuous_at, hx₀, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hy₀), metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds],
assume ε ε0,
rcases exists_pos_rat_lt (half_pos hy₀) with ⟨q, q_pos, q_lt⟩,
let q := (q:ℝ), replace q_pos : 0 < q := rat.cast_pos.2 q_pos,
let δ := min (min q (ε ^ (1 / q))) (1/2),
have δ0 : 0 < δ := lt_min (lt_min q_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos ε0 _)) (by norm_num),
have : δ ≤ q := le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _),
have : δ ≤ ε ^ (1 / q) := le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _),
have : δ < 1 := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by norm_num),
use δ, use δ0, rintros ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hy⟩,
simp only [subtype.dist_eq, real.dist_eq, prod.dist_eq, sub_zero, subtype.coe_mk],
assume h, rw max_lt_iff at h, cases h with xδ yy₀,
have qy : q < y, calc q < y₀ / 2 : q_lt
... = y₀ - y₀ / 2 : (sub_half _).symm
... ≤ y₀ - δ : by linarith
... < y : sub_lt_of_abs_sub_lt_left yy₀,
calc abs(x^y) ≤ abs(x)^y : abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow _ _
... < δ ^ y : rpow_lt_rpow (abs_nonneg _) xδ hy
... < δ ^ q : by { refine rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt _ _ _, repeat {linarith} }
... ≤ (ε ^ (1 / q)) ^ q : by { refine rpow_le_rpow _ _ _, repeat {linarith} }
... = ε : by { rw [← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_one], exact ne_of_gt q_pos, linarith }},
{ exact (continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) _).1
(continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero hx₀ _).continuous_within_at }
end
lemma continuous_at_rpow_of_pos (hy : 0 < y) (x : ℝ) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
continuous_within_at.continuous_at
(continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 continuous_rpow_aux3 _ hy)
(mem_nhds_sets (by { convert is_open_univ.prod (is_open_lt' (0:ℝ)), ext, finish }) hy)
lemma continuous_at_rpow {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
by { cases h, exact continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero h _, exact continuous_at_rpow_of_pos h x }
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {f g : α → ℝ}
/--
`real.rpow` is continuous at all points except for the lower half of the y-axis.
In other words, the function `λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2` is continuous at `(x, y)` if `x ≠ 0` or `y > 0`.
Multiple forms of the claim is provided in the current section.
-/
lemma continuous_rpow (h : ∀a, f a ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ a,
begin
show continuous_at ((λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) ∘ (λa, (f a, g a))) a,
refine continuous_at.comp _ (continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 (hf.prod_mk hg) _),
{ replace h := h a, cases h,
{ exact continuous_at_rpow_of_ne_zero h _ },
{ exact continuous_at_rpow_of_pos h _ }},
end
lemma continuous_rpow_of_ne_zero (h : ∀a, f a ≠ 0) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) := continuous_rpow (λa, or.inl $ h a) hf hg
lemma continuous_rpow_of_pos (h : ∀a, 0 < g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (λa:α, (f a) ^ (g a)) := continuous_rpow (λa, or.inr $ h a) hf hg
end prove_rpow_is_continuous
section prove_rpow_is_differentiable
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_pos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
have : has_deriv_at (λ x, exp (log x * p)) (p * x^(p-1)) x,
{ convert (has_deriv_at_exp _).comp x ((has_deriv_at_log (ne_of_gt h)).mul_const p) using 1,
field_simp [rpow_def_of_pos h, mul_sub, exp_sub, exp_log h, ne_of_gt h],
ring },
apply this.congr_of_eventually_eq,
have : set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) ∈ 𝓝 x := mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioi h,
exact filter.eventually_of_mem this (λ y hy, rpow_def_of_pos hy _)
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_neg {x : ℝ} (h : x < 0) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
have : has_deriv_at (λ x, exp (log x * p) * cos (p * π)) (p * x^(p-1)) x,
{ convert ((has_deriv_at_exp _).comp x ((has_deriv_at_log (ne_of_lt h)).mul_const p)).mul_const _
using 1,
field_simp [rpow_def_of_neg h, mul_sub, exp_sub, sub_mul, cos_sub, exp_log_of_neg h, ne_of_lt h],
ring },
apply this.congr_of_eventually_eq,
have : set.Iio (0 : ℝ) ∈ 𝓝 x := mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio h,
exact filter.eventually_of_mem this (λ y hy, rpow_def_of_neg hy _)
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) (p : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with H|H|H,
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow_of_neg H p },
{ exact (h H).elim },
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow_of_pos H p },
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_zero_of_one_le {p : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * (0 : ℝ)^(p-1)) 0 :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at_of_has_deriv_at_of_ne (λ x hx, has_deriv_at_rpow hx p),
{ exact (continuous_rpow_of_pos (λ _, (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one h))
continuous_id continuous_const).continuous_at },
{ rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with rfl|h,
{ simp [continuous_const.continuous_at] },
{ exact (continuous_const.mul (continuous_rpow_of_pos (λ _, sub_pos_of_lt h)
continuous_id continuous_const)).continuous_at } }
end
lemma has_deriv_at_rpow_of_one_le (x : ℝ) {p : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, x^p) (p * x^(p-1)) x :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ rw hx, exact has_deriv_at_rpow_zero_of_one_le h },
{ exact has_deriv_at_rpow hx p }
end
end prove_rpow_is_differentiable
section sqrt
lemma sqrt_eq_rpow : sqrt = λx:ℝ, x ^ (1/(2:ℝ)) :=
begin
funext, by_cases h : 0 ≤ x,
{ rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg, mul_self_sqrt h, ← pow_two, ← rpow_nat_cast, ← rpow_mul h],
norm_num, exact sqrt_nonneg _, exact rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg h _ },
{ replace h : x < 0 := lt_of_not_ge h,
have : 1 / (2:ℝ) * π = π / (2:ℝ), ring,
rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h), rpow_def_of_neg h, this, cos_pi_div_two, mul_zero] }
end
end sqrt
end real
section measurability_real
open complex
lemma measurable.rpow {α} [measurable_space α] {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f)
(hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
measurable_re.comp $ ((measurable_of_real.comp hf).cpow (measurable_of_real.comp hg))
lemma measurable.rpow_const {α} [measurable_space α] {f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f) {y : ℝ} :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ y) :=
hf.rpow measurable_const
lemma real.measurable_rpow_const {y : ℝ} : measurable (λ x : ℝ, x ^ y) :=
measurable_id.rpow_const
end measurability_real
section differentiability
open real
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x f' : ℝ} {s : set ℝ} (p : ℝ)
/- Differentiability statements for the power of a function, when the function does not vanish
and the exponent is arbitrary-/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.rpow (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_rpow hx p).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf using 1,
ring
end
lemma has_deriv_at.rpow (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hf.rpow p hx
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.rpow (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow p hx).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.rpow (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow p hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.rpow (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s :=
λx h, (hf x h).rpow p (hx x h)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.rpow (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hx : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) :=
λx, (hf x).rpow p (hx x)
lemma deriv_within_rpow (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, (f x)^p) s x = (deriv_within f s x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow p hx).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_rpow (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, (f x)^p) x = (deriv f x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow p hx).deriv
/- Differentiability statements for the power of a function, when the function may vanish
but the exponent is at least one. -/
variable {p}
lemma has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_rpow_of_one_le (f x) hp).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf using 1,
ring
end
lemma has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, (f y)^p) (f' * p * (f x)^(p-1)) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hf.rpow_of_one_le hp
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_on ℝ f s) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) s :=
λx h, (hf x h).rpow_of_one_le hp
@[simp] lemma differentiable.rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable ℝ f) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, (f x)^p) :=
λx, (hf x).rpow_of_one_le hp
lemma deriv_within_rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, (f x)^p) s x = (deriv_within f s x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_rpow_of_one_le (hf : differentiable_at ℝ f x) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
deriv (λx, (f x)^p) x = (deriv f x) * p * (f x)^(p-1) :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.rpow_of_one_le hp).deriv
end differentiability
section limits
open real filter
/-- The function `x ^ y` tends to `+∞` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_at_top {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : tendsto (λ x : ℝ, x ^ y) at_top at_top :=
begin
rw tendsto_at_top_at_top,
intro b,
use (max b 0) ^ (1/y),
intros x hx,
exact le_of_max_le_left
(by { convert rpow_le_rpow (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (le_max_right b 0) (1/y)) hx (le_of_lt hy),
rw [← rpow_mul (le_max_right b 0), (eq_div_iff (ne_of_gt hy)).mp rfl, rpow_one] }),
end
/-- The function `x ^ (-y)` tends to `0` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_neg_at_top {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : tendsto (λ x : ℝ, x ^ (-y)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto.congr' (eventually_eq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top 0) (λ x hx, (rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) y).symm))
(tendsto.inv_tendsto_at_top (tendsto_rpow_at_top hy))
/-- The function `x ^ (a / (b * x + c))` tends to `1` at `+∞`, for any real numbers `a`, `b`, and
`c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (a b c : ℝ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
tendsto (λ x, x ^ (a / (b*x+c))) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
begin
refine tendsto.congr' _ ((tendsto_exp_nhds_0_nhds_1.comp
(by simpa only [mul_zero, pow_one] using ((@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ a _).mul
(tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_at_top b c 1 hb (by norm_num))))).comp (tendsto_log_at_top)),
apply eventually_eq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_at_top (0:ℝ)),
intros x hx,
simp only [set.mem_Ioi, function.comp_app] at hx ⊢,
rw [exp_log hx, ← exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx (a / (b * x + c))), log_rpow hx (a / (b * x + c))],
field_simp,
end
/-- The function `x ^ (1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_div : tendsto (λ x, x ^ ((1:ℝ) / x)) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
by { convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (1:ℝ) _ (0:ℝ) zero_ne_one, ring }
/-- The function `x ^ (-1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
lemma tendsto_rpow_neg_div : tendsto (λ x, x ^ (-(1:ℝ) / x)) at_top (𝓝 1) :=
by { convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (-(1:ℝ)) _ (0:ℝ) zero_ne_one, ring }
end limits
namespace nnreal
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℝ≥0 ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_zero _
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 :=
begin
rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, coe_rpow, ← nnreal.coe_eq_zero],
exact real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
end
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.zero_rpow h
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_one _
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
nnreal.eq $ real.one_rpow _
lemma rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_add (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_neg x.2 _
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x ⁻¹ :=
by simp [rpow_neg]
lemma rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_sub (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) y z
lemma rpow_sub' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) :
x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : (x⁻¹) ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ real.inv_rpow x.2 y
lemma div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
nnreal.eq $ by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using real.rpow_nat_cast x n
lemma mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x*y)^z = x^z * y^z :=
nnreal.eq $ real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z: ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
lemma rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z: ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x^y < x^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
lemma rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
real.rpow_lt_one hx hx1 hz
lemma rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
lemma one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
lemma one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
real.one_le_rpow h h₁
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x^z :=
real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
lemma pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x :=
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, coe_rpow, nnreal.coe_pow], exact real.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv x.2 hn }
lemma rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x :=
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, nnreal.coe_pow, coe_rpow], exact real.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat x.2 hn }
lemma continuous_at_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
continuous_at (λp:ℝ≥0×ℝ, p.1^p.2) (x, y) :=
begin
have : (λp:ℝ≥0×ℝ, p.1^p.2) = nnreal.of_real ∘ (λp:ℝ×ℝ, p.1^p.2) ∘ (λp:ℝ≥0 × ℝ, (p.1.1, p.2)),
{ ext p,
rw [coe_rpow, nnreal.coe_of_real _ (real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg p.1.2 _)],
refl },
rw this,
refine nnreal.continuous_of_real.continuous_at.comp (continuous_at.comp _ _),
{ apply real.continuous_at_rpow,
simp at h,
rw ← (nnreal.coe_eq_zero x) at h,
exact h },
{ exact ((continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk continuous_snd).continuous_at }
end
lemma of_real_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
nnreal.of_real (x ^ y) = (nnreal.of_real x) ^ y :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ← nnreal.coe_of_real x hx,
rw [←nnreal.coe_rpow, nnreal.of_real_coe],
end
end nnreal
namespace measurable
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α]
lemma nnreal_rpow {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : measurable f)
{g : α → ℝ} (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
(hf.nnreal_coe.rpow hg).subtype_mk
lemma nnreal_rpow_const {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : measurable f)
{y : ℝ} :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ y) :=
hf.nnreal_rpow measurable_const
end measurable
open filter
lemma filter.tendsto.nnrpow {α : Type*} {f : filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0} {v : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ}
(hx : tendsto u f (𝓝 x)) (hy : tendsto v f (𝓝 y)) (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 < y) :
tendsto (λ a, (u a) ^ (v a)) f (𝓝 (x ^ y)) :=
tendsto.comp (nnreal.continuous_at_rpow h) (hx.prod_mk_nhds hy)
namespace nnreal
lemma continuous_at_rpow_const {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ y) :
continuous_at (λ z, z^y) x :=
h.elim (λ h, tendsto_id.nnrpow tendsto_const_nhds (or.inl h)) $
λ h, h.eq_or_lt.elim
(λ h, h ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, continuous_at_const])
(λ h, tendsto_id.nnrpow tendsto_const_nhds (or.inr h))
lemma continuous_rpow_const {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) :
continuous (λ x : ℝ≥0, x^y) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, continuous_at_rpow_const (or.inr h)
end nnreal
namespace ennreal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| (some x) y := if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none y := if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : has_pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
by cases x; { dsimp only [(^), rpow], simp [lt_irrefl] }
lemma top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ :=
by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp] lemma top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 :=
by simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero, ← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h],
end
@[simp] lemma zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero, ← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h, ne_of_gt h],
end
lemma zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 y with H|rfl|H,
{ simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl] },
{ simp [lt_irrefl] },
{ simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg] }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.some_eq_coe],
dsimp only [(^), rpow],
simp [h]
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with H|H,
{ simp [hx, H.symm] },
{ simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, nnreal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)] } },
{ exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _ }
end
lemma coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) := rfl
@[simp] lemma rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
by cases x; dsimp only [(^), rpow]; simp [zero_lt_one, not_lt_of_le zero_le_one]
@[simp] lemma one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 :=
by { rw [← coe_one, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero], simp }
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} :
x ^ y = 0 ↔ (x = 0 ∧ 0 < y) ∨ (x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0) :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h] } }
end
@[simp] lemma rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} :
x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ (x = 0 ∧ y < 0) ∨ (x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y) :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h] } }
end
lemma rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ :=
by simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
lemma rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ :=
begin
rw ennreal.rpow_eq_top_iff,
intro h,
cases h,
{ exfalso, rw lt_iff_not_ge at h, exact h.right hy0, },
{ exact h.left, },
end
lemma rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ennreal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
lemma rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ennreal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
lemma rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
begin
cases x, { exact (h'x rfl).elim },
have : x ≠ 0 := λ h, by simpa [h] using hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, nnreal.rpow_add this]
end
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x ^ -y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with H|H|H;
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr] },
{ have A : x ^ y ≠ 0, by simp [h],
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, nnreal.rpow_neg] } }
end
lemma rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x ⁻¹ :=
by simp [rpow_neg]
lemma rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg] },
{ by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [h, Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg] },
{ have : x ^ y ≠ 0, by simp [h],
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, nnreal.rpow_mul] } }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma rpow_nat_cast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
begin
cases x,
{ cases n;
simp [top_rpow_of_pos (nat.cast_add_one_pos _), top_pow (nat.succ_pos _)] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (nat.cast_nonneg n)] }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_mul_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) :
((x : ℝ≥0∞) * y) ^ z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ by_cases hx : x = 0; by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg, H] },
{ have : (y : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hy],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, with_top.top_mul this] },
{ have : (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hx],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_neg H, with_top.mul_top this] },
{ rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy],
simp [hx, hy] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ by_cases hx : x = 0; by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos, H] },
{ have : (y : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hy],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos H, with_top.top_mul this] },
{ have : (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z ≠ 0, by simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff, hx],
simp [hx, hy, zero_rpow_of_pos H, with_top.mul_top this] },
{ rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy],
simp [hx, hy] } },
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_ne_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x^z * y^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx,
lift y to ℝ≥0 using hy,
exact coe_mul_rpow x y z
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_ne_zero {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ cases x; cases y,
{ simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H] },
{ have : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_neg, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have hx' : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
have hy' : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx', coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy'],
simp [hx', hy'] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ cases x; cases y,
{ simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H] },
{ have : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
simp [hx, hy, top_rpow_of_pos, H, rpow_eq_zero_iff, this] },
{ have hx' : x ≠ 0, by simpa using hx,
have hy' : y ≠ 0, by simpa using hy,
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_mul, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, nnreal.mul_rpow, coe_mul,
coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx', coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hy'],
simp [hx', hy'] } }
end
lemma mul_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hz with H|H, { simp [← H] },
by_cases h : x = 0 ∨ y = 0,
{ cases h; simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos H] },
push_neg at h,
exact mul_rpow_of_ne_zero h.1 h.2 z
end
lemma inv_rpow_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : (x⁻¹) ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
begin
by_cases h0 : x = 0,
{ rw [h0, zero_rpow_of_pos hy, inv_zero, top_rpow_of_pos hy], },
by_cases h_top : x = ⊤,
{ rw [h_top, top_rpow_of_pos hy, inv_top, zero_rpow_of_pos hy], },
rw ←coe_to_nnreal h_top,
have h : x.to_nnreal ≠ 0,
{ rw [ne.def, to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff],
simp [h0, h_top], },
rw [←coe_inv h, coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hy), coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hy), ←coe_inv],
{ rw coe_eq_coe,
exact nnreal.inv_rpow x.to_nnreal y, },
{ simp [h], },
end
lemma div_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
(x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
begin
by_cases h0 : z = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
rw ←ne.def at h0,
have hz_pos : 0 < z, from lt_of_le_of_ne hz h0.symm,
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow_of_nonneg x y⁻¹ hz, inv_rpow_of_pos hz_pos, ←div_eq_mul_inv],
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ y^z :=
begin
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h₂ with H|H, { simp [← H, le_refl] },
cases y, { simp [top_rpow_of_pos H] },
cases x, { exact (not_top_le_coe h₁).elim },
simp at h₁,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ h₂, nnreal.rpow_le_rpow h₁ h₂]
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x^z < y^z :=
begin
cases x, { exact (not_top_lt h₁).elim },
cases y, { simp [top_rpow_of_pos h₂, coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt h₂)] },
simp at h₁,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt h₂), nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow h₁ h₂]
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, rpow_le_rpow h (le_of_lt hz)⟩,
rw [←rpow_one x, ←rpow_one y, ←@_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm, rpow_mul,
rpow_mul, ←one_div],
exact rpow_le_rpow h (by simp [le_of_lt hz]),
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h_lt, _, λ h, rpow_lt_rpow h hz⟩,
rw [←rpow_one x, ←rpow_one y, ←@_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm, rpow_mul,
rpow_mul],
exact rpow_lt_rpow h_lt (by simp [hz]),
end
lemma le_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ←rpow_one x,
nth_rewrite 0 ←@_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm,
rw [rpow_mul, ←one_div, @rpow_le_rpow_iff _ _ (1/z) (by simp [hz])],
end
lemma lt_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z < y :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ←rpow_one x,
nth_rewrite 0 ←@_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm,
rw [rpow_mul, ←one_div, @rpow_lt_rpow_iff _ _ (1/z) (by simp [hz])],
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hx' : x ≠ ⊤) (hyz : y < z) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx',
rw [one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz]
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_refl];
linarith },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz] }
end
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x^y < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx1 le_top),
simp at hx0 hx1,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx0), nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz]
end
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x^y ≤ x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx1 coe_lt_top),
by_cases h : x = 0,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with Hy|Hy|Hy;
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with Hz|Hz|Hz;
simp [Hy, Hz, h, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_refl];
linarith },
{ simp at hx1,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h,
nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h) hx1 hyz] }
end
lemma rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x :=
begin
nth_rewrite 1 ←ennreal.rpow_one x,
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx h_one_le,
end
lemma le_rpow_self_of_one_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ≤ x ^ z :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 ←ennreal.rpow_one x,
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx h_one_le,
end
lemma rpow_pos_of_nonneg {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) : 0 < x^p :=
begin
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0,
{ simp [hp_zero, ennreal.zero_lt_one], },
{ rw ←ne.def at hp_zero,
have hp_pos := lt_of_le_of_ne hp_nonneg hp_zero.symm,
rw ←zero_rpow_of_pos hp_pos, exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos, },
end
lemma rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx_ne_top : x ≠ ⊤) : 0 < x^p :=
begin
cases lt_or_le 0 p with hp_pos hp_nonpos,
{ exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hx_pos (le_of_lt hp_pos), },
{ rw [←neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos],
exact rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by simp [hp_nonpos]) hx_ne_top, },
end
lemma rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x^z < 1 :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx le_top),
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.rpow_lt_one (zero_le x) hx hz],
end
lemma rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx coe_lt_top),
simp only [coe_le_one_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hz, nnreal.rpow_le_one hx hz],
end
lemma rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z < 1 :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_neg hz, ennreal.zero_lt_one] },
{ simp only [some_eq_coe, one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz] },
end
lemma rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z < 0) : x^z ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_neg hz, ennreal.zero_lt_one] },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)),
nnreal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx (le_of_lt hz)] },
end
lemma one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_pos hz] },
{ simp only [some_eq_coe, one_lt_coe_iff] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.one_lt_rpow hx hz] }
end
lemma one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
begin
cases x,
{ simp [top_rpow_of_pos hz] },
{ simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx,
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), nnreal.one_le_rpow hx (le_of_lt hz)] },
end
lemma one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx2 le_top),
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff, coe_pos] at ⊢ hx1 hx2,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx1), nnreal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz],
end
lemma one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 ≤ x^z :=
begin
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx2 coe_lt_top),
simp only [coe_le_one_iff, coe_pos] at ⊢ hx1 hx2,
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx1),
nnreal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 (le_of_lt hz)],
end
lemma to_nnreal_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) : (x.to_nnreal) ^ z = (x ^ z).to_nnreal :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with H|H|H,
{ cases x, { simp [H, ne_of_lt] },
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ simp [hx, H, ne_of_lt] },
{ simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx] } },
{ simp [H] },
{ cases x, { simp [H, ne_of_gt] },
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt H)] }
end
lemma to_real_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) : (x.to_real) ^ z = (x ^ z).to_real :=
by rw [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.to_real, ←nnreal.coe_rpow, ennreal.to_nnreal_rpow]
lemma rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
function.injective (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
begin
intros y z hyz,
dsimp only at hyz,
rw [←rpow_one y, ←rpow_one z, ←_root_.mul_inv_cancel hx, rpow_mul, rpow_mul, hyz],
end
lemma rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
function.surjective (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
λ y, ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [←rpow_mul, _root_.inv_mul_cancel hx, rpow_one]⟩
lemma rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
function.bijective (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
lemma rpow_left_monotone_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : monotone (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
λ y z hyz, rpow_le_rpow hyz hx
lemma rpow_left_strict_mono_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : strict_mono (λ y : ℝ≥0∞, y^x) :=
λ y z hyz, rpow_lt_rpow hyz hx
end ennreal
section measurability_ennreal
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α]
lemma ennreal.measurable_rpow : measurable (λ p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) :=
begin
refine ennreal.measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_prod _ _,
{ simp_rw ennreal.coe_rpow_def,
refine measurable.ite _ measurable_const
(measurable_fst.nnreal_rpow measurable_snd).ennreal_coe,
exact measurable_set.inter (measurable_fst (measurable_set_singleton 0))
(measurable_snd measurable_set_Iio), },
{ simp_rw ennreal.top_rpow_def,
refine measurable.ite measurable_set_Ioi measurable_const _,
exact measurable.ite (measurable_set_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const, },
end
lemma measurable.ennreal_rpow {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f) {g : α → ℝ} (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ (g a)) :=
begin
change measurable ((λ p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ, p.1 ^ p.2) ∘ (λ a, (f a, g a))),
exact ennreal.measurable_rpow.comp (measurable.prod hf hg),
end
lemma measurable.ennreal_rpow_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f) {y : ℝ} :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ y) :=
hf.ennreal_rpow measurable_const
lemma ennreal.measurable_rpow_const {y : ℝ} : measurable (λ a : ℝ≥0∞, a ^ y) :=
measurable_id.ennreal_rpow_const
lemma ae_measurable.ennreal_rpow_const {α} [measurable_space α] {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{μ : measure_theory.measure α} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) {y : ℝ} :
ae_measurable (λ a : α, (f a) ^ y) μ :=
ennreal.measurable_rpow_const.comp_ae_measurable hf
end measurability_ennreal
|
aa5aa4e0f81ee5fc161ac6edb04d9d7525e1148e | 94637389e03c919023691dcd05bd4411b1034aa5 | /src/zzz_junk/assignment_5/alg.lean | 84f7810b268e8cc7a61d81484d74e6f4d6d979b3 | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/complogic-s21 | 7c4eef2105abad899e46502270d9829d913e8afc | 99039501b770248c8ceb39890be5dfe129dc1082 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,985,669,944 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 335,706,272 | 0 | 38 | null | 1,618,325,669,000 | 1,612,374,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,742 | lean | import algebra
#check has_one
#check semigroup
#check monoid
namespace alg
universe u
@[class]
structure has_op (α : Type u) :=
(op : α → α → α)
@[instance]
def has_op_nat : has_op nat := ⟨ nat.mul ⟩
@[class]
structure ext_has_op (α : Type u) extends has_op α
instance ext_has_op_nat : ext_has_op nat := ⟨ ⟩
-- my_ext_ext_has_op: optiplicative semigroup plus optiplicative one
@[class]
structure ext_ext_has_op (α : Type u) extends ext_has_op α
instance ext_ext_has_op_nat : ext_ext_has_op nat := ⟨ ⟩
--instance nat_one : my_has_one nat := ⟨ 1 ⟩
def get_op
{α : Type u}
[m : ext_ext_has_op α] :
α → α → α :=
m.op
#check get_op 3 3
def aop (α : Type u) [m : ext_ext_has_op α] : α → α → α := m.op
#eval @aop nat _ 3 3
def foo_op
{α : Type u}
[m : ext_ext_has_op α] :
α → α → α :=
m.op
#check @foo_op
#check foo_op 3 4
#eval foo_op 3 4
/-
-/
set_option trace.class_instances true
set_option class.instance_max_depth 1000
def foo_ox
{α : Type u}
[m : ext_ext_has_op α]
(a : α) : α :=
let mop := m.op in
mop a a
#check @foo_ox
#check foo_ox 3
#eval foo_ox 3
def mul_foldr
{α : Type u}
[m : ext_ext_has_op α] :
list α → α
| [] := m.one
| (h::t) := m.op
/-
def add_foldr
{α : Type u}
[m : ext_ext_has_op α] :
list α → α
| [] := m.one
| (h::t) := m.op h (add_foldr t)
def add_foldr
{α : Type u}
[m : ext_ext_has_op α] :
list α → α
| [] := m.one
| (h::t) := m.op h (add_foldr t)
def add_foldr
{α : Type u}
[m : ext_ext_has_op α] :
list α → α
| [] := m.one
| (h::t) := m.op h (add_foldr t)
-/
/-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvmuCPvRoWQ
-/
end alg |
4713ba11bb0fa3ec40815323f5b82dedeb68e17d | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/group_theory/exponent.lean | 153276863eb4adace58773424a9052f7ec9a0ef2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,680 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Julian Kuelshammer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import data.zmod.quotient
import group_theory.noncomm_pi_coprod
import group_theory.order_of_element
import algebra.gcd_monoid.finset
import data.nat.factorization.basic
import tactic.by_contra
/-!
# Exponent of a group
This file defines the exponent of a group, or more generally a monoid. For a group `G` it is defined
to be the minimal `n≥1` such that `g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`. For a finite group `G`,
it is equal to the lowest common multiple of the order of all elements of the group `G`.
## Main definitions
* `monoid.exponent_exists` is a predicate on a monoid `G` saying that there is some positive `n`
such that `g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`.
* `monoid.exponent` defines the exponent of a monoid `G` as the minimal positive `n` such that
`g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`, by convention it is `0` if no such `n` exists.
* `add_monoid.exponent_exists` the additive version of `monoid.exponent_exists`.
* `add_monoid.exponent` the additive version of `monoid.exponent`.
## Main results
* `monoid.lcm_order_eq_exponent`: For a finite left cancel monoid `G`, the exponent is equal to the
`finset.lcm` of the order of its elements.
* `monoid.exponent_eq_supr_order_of(')`: For a commutative cancel monoid, the exponent is
equal to `⨆ g : G, order_of g` (or zero if it has any order-zero elements).
## TODO
* Refactor the characteristic of a ring to be the exponent of its underlying additive group.
-/
universe u
variable {G : Type u}
open_locale classical
namespace monoid
section monoid
variables (G) [monoid G]
/--A predicate on a monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such that `g ^ n = 1`
for all `g`.-/
@[to_additive "A predicate on an additive monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such
that `n • g = 0` for all `g`."]
def exponent_exists := ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1
/--The exponent of a group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that `g ^ n = 1` for all
`g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention.-/
@[to_additive "The exponent of an additive group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that
`n • g = 0` for all `g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention."]
noncomputable def exponent :=
if h : exponent_exists G then nat.find h else 0
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
lemma exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero : exponent_exists G ↔ exponent G ≠ 0 :=
begin
rw [exponent],
split_ifs,
{ simp [h, @not_lt_zero' ℕ] }, --if this isn't done this way, `to_additive` freaks
{ tauto },
end
@[to_additive]
lemma exponent_eq_zero_iff : exponent G = 0 ↔ ¬ exponent_exists G :=
by simp only [exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero, not_not]
@[to_additive]
lemma exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero {g : G} (hg : order_of g = 0) : exponent G = 0 :=
exponent_eq_zero_iff.mpr $ λ ⟨n, hn, hgn⟩, order_of_eq_zero_iff'.mp hg n hn $ hgn g
@[to_additive exponent_nsmul_eq_zero]
lemma pow_exponent_eq_one (g : G) : g ^ exponent G = 1 :=
begin
by_cases exponent_exists G,
{ simp_rw [exponent, dif_pos h],
exact (nat.find_spec h).2 g },
{ simp_rw [exponent, dif_neg h, pow_zero] }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_eq_mod_exponent {n : ℕ} (g : G): g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G) :=
calc g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G + exponent G * (n / exponent G)) : by rw [nat.mod_add_div]
... = g ^ (n % exponent G) : by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_exponent_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma exponent_pos_of_exists (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
0 < exponent G :=
begin
have h : ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1 := ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩,
rw [exponent, dif_pos],
exact (nat.find_spec h).1,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma exponent_min' (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
exponent G ≤ n :=
begin
rw [exponent, dif_pos],
{ apply nat.find_min',
exact ⟨hpos, hG⟩ },
{ exact ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩ },
end
@[to_additive]
lemma exponent_min (m : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < m) (hm : m < exponent G) : ∃ g : G, g ^ m ≠ 1 :=
begin
by_contra' h,
have hcon : exponent G ≤ m := exponent_min' m hpos h,
linarith,
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton [subsingleton G] : exponent G = 1 :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply exponent_min' _ nat.one_pos,
simp },
{ apply nat.succ_le_of_lt,
apply exponent_pos_of_exists 1 (nat.one_pos),
simp },
end
@[to_additive add_order_dvd_exponent]
lemma order_dvd_exponent (g : G) : (order_of g) ∣ exponent G :=
order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one $ pow_exponent_eq_one g
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
lemma exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one (G) [monoid G] (n : ℕ) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
exponent G ∣ n :=
begin
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | hpos,
{ exact dvd_zero _ },
apply nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero,
by_contradiction h,
have h₁ := nat.pos_of_ne_zero h,
have h₂ : n % exponent G < exponent G := nat.mod_lt _ (exponent_pos_of_exists n hpos hG),
have h₃ : exponent G ≤ n % exponent G,
{ apply exponent_min' _ h₁,
simp_rw ←pow_eq_mod_exponent,
exact hG },
linarith,
end
@[to_additive lcm_add_order_of_dvd_exponent]
lemma lcm_order_of_dvd_exponent [fintype G] : (finset.univ : finset G).lcm order_of ∣ exponent G :=
begin
apply finset.lcm_dvd,
intros g hg,
exact order_dvd_exponent g
end
@[to_additive exists_order_of_eq_pow_padic_val_nat_add_exponent]
lemma _root_.nat.prime.exists_order_of_eq_pow_factorization_exponent {p : ℕ} (hp : p.prime) :
∃ g : G, order_of g = p ^ (exponent G).factorization p :=
begin
haveI := fact.mk hp,
rcases eq_or_ne ((exponent G).factorization p) 0 with h | h,
{ refine ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_zero, order_of_one]⟩ },
have he : 0 < exponent G := ne.bot_lt (λ ht,
by {rw ht at h, apply h, rw [bot_eq_zero, nat.factorization_zero, finsupp.zero_apply] }),
rw ← finsupp.mem_support_iff at h,
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ (g : G), g ^ (exponent G / p) ≠ 1,
{ suffices key : ¬ exponent G ∣ exponent G / p,
{ simpa using mt (exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one G (exponent G / p)) key },
exact λ hd, hp.one_lt.not_le ((mul_le_iff_le_one_left he).mp $
nat.le_of_dvd he $ nat.mul_dvd_of_dvd_div (nat.dvd_of_mem_factorization h) hd) },
obtain ⟨k, hk : exponent G = p ^ _ * k⟩ := nat.ord_proj_dvd _ _,
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp h),
refine ⟨g ^ k, _⟩,
rw ht,
apply order_of_eq_prime_pow,
{ rwa [hk, mul_comm, ht, pow_succ', ←mul_assoc, nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp.pos, pow_mul] at hg },
{ rw [←nat.succ_eq_add_one, ←ht, ←pow_mul, mul_comm, ←hk],
exact pow_exponent_eq_one g },
end
variable {G}
@[to_additive] lemma exponent_ne_zero_iff_range_order_of_finite (h : ∀ g : G, 0 < order_of g) :
exponent G ≠ 0 ↔ (set.range (order_of : G → ℕ)).finite :=
begin
refine ⟨λ he, _, λ he, _⟩,
{ by_contra h,
obtain ⟨m, ⟨t, rfl⟩, het⟩ := set.infinite.exists_nat_lt h (exponent G),
exact pow_ne_one_of_lt_order_of' he het (pow_exponent_eq_one t) },
{ lift (set.range order_of) to finset ℕ using he with t ht,
have htpos : 0 < t.prod id,
{ refine finset.prod_pos (λ a ha, _),
rw [←finset.mem_coe, ht] at ha,
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ha,
exact h k },
suffices : exponent G ∣ t.prod id,
{ intro h,
rw [h, zero_dvd_iff] at this,
exact htpos.ne' this },
refine exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one _ _ (λ g, _),
rw [pow_eq_mod_order_of, nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, pow_zero g],
apply finset.dvd_prod_of_mem,
rw [←finset.mem_coe, ht],
exact set.mem_range_self g },
end
@[to_additive] lemma exponent_eq_zero_iff_range_order_of_infinite (h : ∀ g : G, 0 < order_of g) :
exponent G = 0 ↔ (set.range (order_of : G → ℕ)).infinite :=
have _ := exponent_ne_zero_iff_range_order_of_finite h,
by rwa [ne.def, not_iff_comm, iff.comm] at this
@[to_additive lcm_add_order_eq_exponent]
lemma lcm_order_eq_exponent [fintype G] : (finset.univ : finset G).lcm order_of = exponent G :=
begin
apply nat.dvd_antisymm (lcm_order_of_dvd_exponent G),
refine exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one G _ (λ g, _),
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ : order_of g ∣ finset.univ.lcm order_of := finset.dvd_lcm (finset.mem_univ g),
rw [hm, pow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one, one_pow]
end
end monoid
section left_cancel_monoid
variable [left_cancel_monoid G]
@[to_additive]
lemma exponent_ne_zero_of_finite [finite G] : exponent G ≠ 0 :=
by { casesI nonempty_fintype G,
simpa [←lcm_order_eq_exponent, finset.lcm_eq_zero_iff] using λ x, (order_of_pos x).ne' }
end left_cancel_monoid
section comm_monoid
variable [comm_monoid G]
@[to_additive] lemma exponent_eq_supr_order_of (h : ∀ g : G, 0 < order_of g) :
exponent G = ⨆ g : G, order_of g :=
begin
rw supr,
rcases eq_or_ne (exponent G) 0 with he | he,
{ rw [he, set.infinite.nat.Sup_eq_zero $ (exponent_eq_zero_iff_range_order_of_infinite h).1 he] },
have hne : (set.range (order_of : G → ℕ)).nonempty := ⟨1, 1, order_of_one⟩,
have hfin : (set.range (order_of : G → ℕ)).finite,
{ rwa [← exponent_ne_zero_iff_range_order_of_finite h] },
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := hne.cSup_mem hfin,
apply nat.dvd_antisymm _,
{ rw ←ht,
apply order_dvd_exponent },
refine nat.dvd_of_factors_subperm he _,
rw list.subperm_ext_iff,
by_contra' h,
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpe⟩ := h,
replace hp := nat.prime_of_mem_factors hp,
simp only [nat.factors_count_eq] at hpe,
set k := (order_of t).factorization p with hk,
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := hp.exists_order_of_eq_pow_factorization_exponent G,
suffices : order_of t < order_of (t ^ (p ^ k) * g),
{ rw ht at this,
exact this.not_le (le_cSup hfin.bdd_above $ set.mem_range_self _) },
have hpk : p ^ k ∣ order_of t := nat.ord_proj_dvd _ _,
have hpk' : order_of (t ^ p ^ k) = order_of t / p ^ k,
{ rw [order_of_pow' t (pow_ne_zero k hp.ne_zero), nat.gcd_eq_right hpk] },
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hpe,
have hcoprime : (order_of (t ^ p ^ k)).coprime (order_of g),
{ rw [hg, nat.coprime_pow_right_iff (pos_of_gt hpe), nat.coprime_comm],
apply or.resolve_right (nat.coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _),
nth_rewrite 0 ←pow_one p,
convert nat.pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd (h $ t ^ p ^ k).ne' hp,
rw [hpk', nat.factorization_div hpk],
simp [hp] },
rw [(commute.all _ g).order_of_mul_eq_mul_order_of_of_coprime hcoprime, hpk', hg, ha, ←ht, ←hk,
pow_add, pow_add, pow_one, ←mul_assoc, ←mul_assoc, nat.div_mul_cancel, mul_assoc,
lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right $ h t, ←pow_succ'],
exact one_lt_pow hp.one_lt a.succ_ne_zero,
exact hpk
end
@[to_additive] lemma exponent_eq_supr_order_of' :
exponent G = if ∃ g : G, order_of g = 0 then 0 else ⨆ g : G, order_of g :=
begin
split_ifs,
{ obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := h,
exact exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero hg },
{ have := not_exists.mp h,
exact exponent_eq_supr_order_of (λ g, ne.bot_lt $ this g) }
end
end comm_monoid
section cancel_comm_monoid
variables [cancel_comm_monoid G]
@[to_additive] lemma exponent_eq_max'_order_of [fintype G] :
exponent G = ((@finset.univ G _).image order_of).max' ⟨1, by simp⟩ :=
begin
rw [←finset.nonempty.cSup_eq_max', finset.coe_image, finset.coe_univ, set.image_univ, ← supr],
exact exponent_eq_supr_order_of order_of_pos
end
end cancel_comm_monoid
end monoid
section comm_group
open subgroup
open_locale big_operators
variables (G) [comm_group G] [group.fg G]
@[to_additive] lemma card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank : nat.card G ∣ monoid.exponent G ^ group.rank G :=
begin
obtain ⟨S, hS1, hS2⟩ := group.rank_spec G,
rw [←hS1, ←fintype.card_coe, ←finset.card_univ, ←finset.prod_const],
let f : (Π g : S, zpowers (g : G)) →* G := noncomm_pi_coprod (λ s t h x y hx hy, mul_comm x y),
have hf : function.surjective f,
{ rw [←monoid_hom.range_top_iff_surjective, eq_top_iff, ←hS2, closure_le],
exact λ g hg, ⟨pi.mul_single ⟨g, hg⟩ ⟨g, mem_zpowers g⟩, noncomm_pi_coprod_mul_single _ _⟩ },
replace hf := nat_card_dvd_of_surjective f hf,
rw nat.card_pi at hf,
refine hf.trans (finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd _ _ (λ g hg, _)),
rw ← order_eq_card_zpowers',
exact monoid.order_dvd_exponent (g : G),
end
@[to_additive] lemma card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank' {n : ℕ} (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
nat.card G ∣ n ^ group.rank G :=
(card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank G).trans
(pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (monoid.exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one G n hG) (group.rank G))
end comm_group
|
e31d725515a7c0af1b27bb719a12777af251cc14 | 22e97a5d648fc451e25a06c668dc03ac7ed7bc25 | /src/algebra/category/Group/colimits.lean | 463621ceed043b25f88755f7a78f5ad1ec8f0780 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | keeferrowan/mathlib | f2818da875dbc7780830d09bd4c526b0764a4e50 | aad2dfc40e8e6a7e258287a7c1580318e865817e | refs/heads/master | 1,661,736,426,952 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 266,892,663 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,445,835,000 | 1,590,445,835,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,543 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.category.Group.basic
import category_theory.limits.limits
import category_theory.limits.concrete_category
/-!
# The category of additive commutative groups has all colimits.
This file uses a "pre-automated" approach, just as for `Mon/colimits.lean`.
It is a very uniform approach, that conceivably could be synthesised directly
by a tactic that analyses the shape of `add_comm_group` and `monoid_hom`.
TODO:
In fact, in `AddCommGroup` there is a much nicer model of colimits as quotients
of finitely supported functions, and we really should implement this as well (or instead).
-/
universes u v
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
-- [ROBOT VOICE]:
-- You should pretend for now that this file was automatically generated.
-- It follows the same template as colimits in Mon.
namespace AddCommGroup.colimits
/-!
We build the colimit of a diagram in `AddCommGroup` by constructing the
free group on the disjoint union of all the abelian groups in the diagram,
then taking the quotient by the abelian group laws within each abelian group,
and the identifications given by the morphisms in the diagram.
-/
variables {J : Type v} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ AddCommGroup.{v})
/--
An inductive type representing all group expressions (without relations)
on a collection of types indexed by the objects of `J`.
-/
inductive prequotient
-- There's always `of`
| of : Π (j : J) (x : F.obj j), prequotient
-- Then one generator for each operation
| zero : prequotient
| neg : prequotient → prequotient
| add : prequotient → prequotient → prequotient
instance : inhabited (prequotient F) := ⟨prequotient.zero⟩
open prequotient
/--
The relation on `prequotient` saying when two expressions are equal
because of the abelian group laws, or
because one element is mapped to another by a morphism in the diagram.
-/
inductive relation : prequotient F → prequotient F → Prop
-- Make it an equivalence relation:
| refl : Π (x), relation x x
| symm : Π (x y) (h : relation x y), relation y x
| trans : Π (x y z) (h : relation x y) (k : relation y z), relation x z
-- There's always a `map` relation
| map : Π (j j' : J) (f : j ⟶ j') (x : F.obj j), relation (of j' (F.map f x)) (of j x)
-- Then one relation per operation, describing the interaction with `of`
| zero : Π (j), relation (of j 0) zero
| neg : Π (j) (x : F.obj j), relation (of j (-x)) (neg (of j x))
| add : Π (j) (x y : F.obj j), relation (of j (x + y)) (add (of j x) (of j y))
-- Then one relation per argument of each operation
| neg_1 : Π (x x') (r : relation x x'), relation (neg x) (neg x')
| add_1 : Π (x x' y) (r : relation x x'), relation (add x y) (add x' y)
| add_2 : Π (x y y') (r : relation y y'), relation (add x y) (add x y')
-- And one relation per axiom
| zero_add : Π (x), relation (add zero x) x
| add_zero : Π (x), relation (add x zero) x
| add_left_neg : Π (x), relation (add (neg x) x) zero
| add_comm : Π (x y), relation (add x y) (add y x)
| add_assoc : Π (x y z), relation (add (add x y) z) (add x (add y z))
/--
The setoid corresponding to group expressions modulo abelian group relations and identifications.
-/
def colimit_setoid : setoid (prequotient F) :=
{ r := relation F, iseqv := ⟨relation.refl, relation.symm, relation.trans⟩ }
attribute [instance] colimit_setoid
/--
The underlying type of the colimit of a diagram in `AddCommGroup`.
-/
@[derive inhabited]
def colimit_type : Type v := quotient (colimit_setoid F)
instance : add_comm_group (colimit_type F) :=
{ zero :=
begin
exact quot.mk _ zero
end,
neg :=
begin
fapply @quot.lift,
{ intro x,
exact quot.mk _ (neg x) },
{ intros x x' r,
apply quot.sound,
exact relation.neg_1 _ _ r },
end,
add :=
begin
fapply @quot.lift _ _ ((colimit_type F) → (colimit_type F)),
{ intro x,
fapply @quot.lift,
{ intro y,
exact quot.mk _ (add x y) },
{ intros y y' r,
apply quot.sound,
exact relation.add_2 _ _ _ r } },
{ intros x x' r,
funext y,
induction y,
dsimp,
apply quot.sound,
{ exact relation.add_1 _ _ _ r },
{ refl } },
end,
zero_add := λ x,
begin
induction x,
dsimp,
apply quot.sound,
apply relation.zero_add,
refl,
end,
add_zero := λ x,
begin
induction x,
dsimp,
apply quot.sound,
apply relation.add_zero,
refl,
end,
add_left_neg := λ x,
begin
induction x,
dsimp,
apply quot.sound,
apply relation.add_left_neg,
refl,
end,
add_comm := λ x y,
begin
induction x,
induction y,
dsimp,
apply quot.sound,
apply relation.add_comm,
refl,
refl,
end,
add_assoc := λ x y z,
begin
induction x,
induction y,
induction z,
dsimp,
apply quot.sound,
apply relation.add_assoc,
refl,
refl,
refl,
end, }
@[simp] lemma quot_zero : quot.mk setoid.r zero = (0 : colimit_type F) := rfl
@[simp] lemma quot_neg (x) : quot.mk setoid.r (neg x) = (-(quot.mk setoid.r x) : colimit_type F) := rfl
@[simp] lemma quot_add (x y) : quot.mk setoid.r (add x y) = ((quot.mk setoid.r x) + (quot.mk setoid.r y) : colimit_type F) := rfl
/-- The bundled abelian group giving the colimit of a diagram. -/
def colimit : AddCommGroup := AddCommGroup.of (colimit_type F)
/-- The function from a given abelian group in the diagram to the colimit abelian group. -/
def cocone_fun (j : J) (x : F.obj j) : colimit_type F :=
quot.mk _ (of j x)
/-- The group homomorphism from a given abelian group in the diagram to the colimit abelian group. -/
def cocone_morphism (j : J) : F.obj j ⟶ colimit F :=
{ to_fun := cocone_fun F j,
map_zero' := by apply quot.sound; apply relation.zero,
map_add' := by intros; apply quot.sound; apply relation.add }
@[simp] lemma cocone_naturality {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
F.map f ≫ (cocone_morphism F j') = cocone_morphism F j :=
begin
ext,
apply quot.sound,
apply relation.map,
end
@[simp] lemma cocone_naturality_components (j j' : J) (f : j ⟶ j') (x : F.obj j):
(cocone_morphism F j') (F.map f x) = (cocone_morphism F j) x :=
by { rw ←cocone_naturality F f, refl }
/-- The cocone over the proposed colimit abelian group. -/
def colimit_cocone : cocone F :=
{ X := colimit F,
ι :=
{ app := cocone_morphism F } }.
/-- The function from the free abelian group on the diagram to the cone point of any other cocone. -/
@[simp] def desc_fun_lift (s : cocone F) : prequotient F → s.X
| (of j x) := (s.ι.app j) x
| zero := 0
| (neg x) := -(desc_fun_lift x)
| (add x y) := desc_fun_lift x + desc_fun_lift y
/-- The function from the colimit abelian group to the cone point of any other cocone. -/
def desc_fun (s : cocone F) : colimit_type F → s.X :=
begin
fapply quot.lift,
{ exact desc_fun_lift F s },
{ intros x y r,
induction r; try { dsimp },
-- refl
{ refl },
-- symm
{ exact r_ih.symm },
-- trans
{ exact eq.trans r_ih_h r_ih_k },
-- map
{ simp, },
-- zero
{ simp, },
-- neg
{ simp, },
-- add
{ simp, },
-- neg_1
{ rw r_ih, },
-- add_1
{ rw r_ih, },
-- add_2
{ rw r_ih, },
-- zero_add
{ rw zero_add, },
-- add_zero
{ rw add_zero, },
-- add_left_neg
{ rw add_left_neg, },
-- add_comm
{ rw add_comm, },
-- add_assoc
{ rw add_assoc, },
}
end
/-- The group homomorphism from the colimit abelian group to the cone point of any other cocone. -/
@[simps]
def desc_morphism (s : cocone F) : colimit F ⟶ s.X :=
{ to_fun := desc_fun F s,
map_zero' := rfl,
map_add' := λ x y, by { induction x; induction y; refl }, }
/-- Evidence that the proposed colimit is the colimit. -/
def colimit_is_colimit : is_colimit (colimit_cocone F) :=
{ desc := λ s, desc_morphism F s,
uniq' := λ s m w,
begin
ext,
induction x,
induction x,
{ have w' := congr_fun (congr_arg (λ f : F.obj x_j ⟶ s.X, (f : F.obj x_j → s.X)) (w x_j)) x_x,
erw w',
refl, },
{ simp *, },
{ simp *, },
{ simp *, },
refl
end }.
instance has_colimits_AddCommGroup : has_colimits.{v} AddCommGroup.{v} :=
{ has_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥,
{ has_colimit := λ F, by exactI
{ cocone := colimit_cocone F,
is_colimit := colimit_is_colimit F } } }
end AddCommGroup.colimits
|
7bccf7d68435c4c46ad615057a63c046a18094d6 | 952248371e69ccae722eb20bfe6815d8641554a8 | /src/datatypes/comp.lean | 894d9964fafd1c45efbc148c577fe93de1cab889 | [] | no_license | robertylewis/lean_polya | 5fd079031bf7114449d58d68ccd8c3bed9bcbc97 | 1da14d60a55ad6cd8af8017b1b64990fccb66ab7 | refs/heads/master | 1,647,212,226,179 | 1,558,108,354,000 | 1,558,108,354,000 | 89,933,264 | 1 | 2 | null | 1,560,964,118,000 | 1,493,650,551,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,604 | lean | import .basic
namespace polya
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive comp
| le | lt | ge | gt
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive gen_comp
| le | lt | ge | gt | eq | ne
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive spec_comp
| lt | le | eq
namespace comp
def dir : comp → ℤ
| le := -1
| lt := -1
| ge := 1
| gt := 1
def reverse : comp → comp
| le := ge
| lt := gt
| ge := le
| gt := lt
def negate : comp → comp
| le := gt
| lt := ge
| ge := lt
| gt := le
def strengthen : comp → comp
| le := lt
| ge := gt
| a := a
def is_strict : comp → bool
| lt := tt
| gt := tt
| _ := ff
def is_less : comp → bool
| lt := tt
| le := tt
| _ := ff
def is_greater : comp → bool := bnot ∘ is_less
def implies (c1 c2 : comp) : bool :=
(is_less c1 = is_less c2) && (is_strict c1 || bnot (is_strict c2))
meta def to_format : comp → format
| le := "≤"
| lt := "<"
| ge := "≥"
| gt := ">"
def to_gen_comp : comp → gen_comp
| le := gen_comp.le
| lt := gen_comp.lt
| ge := gen_comp.ge
| gt := gen_comp.gt
meta def to_pexpr : comp → pexpr
| le := ``(has_le.le)
| lt := ``(has_lt.lt)
| ge := ``(ge)
| gt := ``(gt)
section
open tactic
meta def to_function (lhs rhs : expr) : comp → tactic expr
| lt := to_expr ``(%%lhs < %%rhs)
| le := to_expr ``(%%lhs ≤ %%rhs)
| gt := to_expr ``(%%lhs > %%rhs)
| ge := to_expr ``(%%lhs ≥ %%rhs)
end
def prod : comp → comp → comp
| gt a := a
| a gt := a
| ge ge := ge
| ge lt := le
| ge le := le
| lt ge := le
| le ge := le
| le le := ge
| le lt := ge
| lt le := ge
| lt lt := gt
meta instance : has_coe comp gen_comp :=
⟨to_gen_comp⟩
meta instance : has_to_format comp :=
⟨to_format⟩
end comp
namespace gen_comp
instance : inhabited gen_comp := ⟨eq⟩
def dir : gen_comp → ℤ
| le := -1
| lt := -1
| ge := 1
| gt := 1
| eq := 0
| ne := 0
def reverse : gen_comp → gen_comp
| le := ge
| lt := gt
| ge := le
| gt := lt
| eq := eq
| ne := ne
def negate : gen_comp → gen_comp
| le := gt
| lt := ge
| ge := lt
| gt := le
| eq := ne
| ne := eq
def is_strict : gen_comp → bool
| lt := tt
| gt := tt
| _ := ff
def is_less : gen_comp → bool
| lt := tt
| le := tt
| _ := ff
def is_greater : gen_comp → bool
| gt := tt
| ge := tt
| _ := ff
def is_less_or_eq : gen_comp → bool
| lt := tt
| le := tt
| eq := tt
| _ := ff
def is_greater_or_eq : gen_comp → bool
| gt := tt
| ge := tt
| eq := tt
| _ := ff
def is_ineq : gen_comp → bool
| eq := ff
| ne := ff
| _ := tt
def strongest : gen_comp → gen_comp → gen_comp
| gt ge := gt
| lt le := lt
| ge gt := gt
| le lt := lt
| eq b := b
| a eq := a
| a b := if a = b then a else b
def implies_aux : gen_comp → gen_comp → bool
| lt le := tt
| gt ge := tt
| eq le := tt
| eq ge := tt
| lt ne := tt
| gt ne := tt
| _ _ := ff
def implies (c1 c2 : gen_comp) : bool :=
(c1 = c2) || implies_aux c1 c2
def contr : gen_comp → gen_comp → bool
| lt gt := tt
| lt ge := tt
| lt eq := tt
| le gt := tt
| eq ne := tt
| eq lt := tt
| eq gt := tt
| ge lt := tt
| gt lt := tt
| gt le := tt
| gt eq := tt
| _ _ := ff
def prod : gen_comp → gen_comp → option gen_comp
| ne ne := ne
| ne eq := eq
| eq ne := eq
| ne gt := ne
| ne lt := ne
| gt ne := ne
| lt ne := ne
| ne a := none
| a ne := none
| gt a := a
| a gt := a
| eq a := eq
| a eq := eq
| ge ge := ge
| ge le := le
| le ge := le
| ge lt := le
| lt ge := le
| le le := ge
| le lt := ge
| lt le := ge
| lt lt := gt
-- may not be right for = or ≠
def pow (c1 : gen_comp) (z : ℤ) : gen_comp :=
if (bnot c1.is_less) || (z ≥ 0) || (z % 2 = 0) then c1
else c1.reverse
/--
Be careful. In the ne or eq case, this returns ge.
TODO: should we instantiate has_coe gen_comp comp?
-/
meta def to_comp : gen_comp → comp
| le := comp.le
| lt := comp.lt
| ge := comp.ge
| gt := comp.gt
| _ := comp.ge
/--
Be careful. This only matches strength
-/
meta def to_spec_comp : gen_comp → spec_comp
| le := spec_comp.le
| ge := spec_comp.le
| lt := spec_comp.lt
| gt := spec_comp.lt
| _ := spec_comp.eq
meta def to_function (lhs rhs : expr) : gen_comp → tactic expr
| le := tactic.to_expr ``(%%lhs ≤ %%rhs)
| lt := tactic.to_expr ``(%%lhs < %%rhs)
| ge := tactic.to_expr ``(%%lhs ≥ %%rhs)
| gt := tactic.to_expr ``(%%lhs > %%rhs)
| eq := tactic.to_expr ``(%%lhs = %%rhs)
| ne := tactic.to_expr ``(%%lhs ≠ %%rhs)
meta def to_format : gen_comp → format
| le := "≤"
| lt := "<"
| ge := "≥"
| gt := ">"
| eq := "="
| ne := "≠"
meta instance : has_to_format gen_comp := ⟨to_format⟩
end gen_comp
def spec_comp_and_flipped_of_comp : comp → spec_comp × bool
| comp.lt := (spec_comp.lt, ff)
| comp.le := (spec_comp.le, ff)
| comp.gt := (spec_comp.lt, tt)
| comp.ge := (spec_comp.le, tt)
meta def point_of_coeff_and_comps (c : ℚ) : option gen_comp → option gen_comp → option (ℚ × ℚ)
| (some gen_comp.eq) r := point_of_coeff_and_comps none r
| (some gen_comp.ne) r := point_of_coeff_and_comps none r
| l (some gen_comp.eq) := point_of_coeff_and_comps l none
| l (some gen_comp.ne) := point_of_coeff_and_comps l none
| (some l) none := if l.is_less then some (-1, -1/c) else some (1, 1/c)
| none (some r) := if r.is_less then some (-c, -1) else some (c, 1)
| none none := none
| (some l) (some r) :=
if (c ≥ 0) && (l.is_less = r.is_less) then point_of_coeff_and_comps (some l) none
else if (c < 0) && bnot (l.is_less = r.is_less) then point_of_coeff_and_comps (some l) none
else none
namespace spec_comp
def strongest : spec_comp → spec_comp → spec_comp
| spec_comp.lt _ := spec_comp.lt
| _ spec_comp.lt := spec_comp.lt
| spec_comp.le _ := spec_comp.le
| _ spec_comp.le := spec_comp.le
| spec_comp.eq spec_comp.eq := spec_comp.eq
/--
This is nonsense on eq
-/
def to_comp : spec_comp → comp
| spec_comp.lt := comp.lt
| spec_comp.le := comp.le
| spec_comp.eq := comp.gt
def to_gen_comp : spec_comp → gen_comp
| spec_comp.lt := gen_comp.lt
| spec_comp.le := gen_comp.le
| spec_comp.eq := gen_comp.eq
meta def to_format : spec_comp → format
| spec_comp.lt := "<"
| spec_comp.le := "≤"
| spec_comp.eq := "="
meta instance has_to_format : has_to_format spec_comp := ⟨to_format⟩
end spec_comp
/--
This does not represent the traditional slope, but (x/y) if (x, y) is a point on the line
-/
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive slope
| horiz : slope
| some : rat → slope
meta def slope.to_format : slope → format
| slope.horiz := "horiz"
| (slope.some m) := to_fmt m
meta instance : has_to_format slope := ⟨slope.to_format⟩
meta def slope.invert : slope → slope
| slope.horiz := slope.some 0
| (slope.some m) := if m = 0 then slope.horiz else slope.some (1/m)
/--
An inequality (str, a, b) represents the halfplane counterclockwise from the vector (a, b).
If str is true, it is strict (ie, it doesn't include the line bx-ay=0).
-/
@[derive decidable_eq]
structure ineq :=
(strict : bool)
(x y : ℚ)
namespace ineq
instance : inhabited ineq :=
⟨⟨ff, 1, 0⟩⟩
def is_axis (i : ineq) : bool :=
(i.x = 0) || (i.y = 0)
open polya.comp slope
def to_comp (i : ineq) : comp := -- DOUBLE CHECK THIS
/-if i.x ≥ 0 then
if i.y > 0 then
if i.strict then lt else le
else
if i.strict then gt else ge
else
if i.y > 0 then
if i.strict then lt else le
else
if i.strict then gt else ge-/
if i.y > 0 then
if i.strict then lt else le
else if i.y < 0 then
if i.strict then gt else ge
else if i.x < 0 then
if i.strict then lt else le
else if i.strict then gt else ge
def to_slope (i : ineq) : slope :=
if i.y = 0 then slope.horiz else slope.some (i.x / i.y)
meta def to_format (inq : ineq) : format :=
let cf := to_fmt inq.to_comp in
match inq.to_slope with
| slope.horiz := "(rhs)" ++ cf ++ "0"
| slope.some c := if c = 0 then "(lhs)" ++ cf ++ "0" else
"(lhs) " ++ cf ++ to_fmt c ++ "(rhs)"
end
meta instance ineq.has_to_format : has_to_format ineq :=
⟨to_format⟩
meta def is_zero_slope (i : ineq) : bool :=
(i.x = 0) && bnot (i.y = 0)
meta def is_horiz (i : ineq) : bool :=
i.y = 0
def equiv (i1 i2 : ineq) : bool :=
to_slope i1 = to_slope i2
def of_comp_and_slope (c : comp) : slope → ineq
| horiz := if is_less c then ⟨is_strict c, -1, 0⟩ else ⟨is_strict c, 1, 0⟩
| (some v) :=
if v > 0 then
if is_less c then ⟨is_strict c, v, 1⟩ else ⟨is_strict c, -v, -1⟩
else
if is_less c then ⟨is_strict c, v, 1⟩ else ⟨is_strict c, -v, -1⟩
/--
Turns a < 3b into a > 3b
-/
def flip (i : ineq) : ineq :=
⟨i.strict, -i.x, -i.y⟩
/--
Turns a < 3b into a ≥ 3b
-/
def negate (i : ineq) : ineq :=
⟨bnot i.strict, -i.x, -i.y⟩
/--
Turns a < 3b into b > 1/3 a.
This is equivalent to reflecting over the identity line and flipping
-/
def reverse (i : ineq) : ineq :=
⟨i.strict, -i.y, -i.x⟩
/--
Turns a ≤ 3b into a < 3b.
-/
def strengthen (i : ineq) : ineq :=
{i with strict := tt}
def same_quadrant (i1 i2 : ineq) : bool :=
(i1.x > 0 ↔ i2.x > 0) && (i1.y > 0 ↔ i2.y > 0)
def implies (i1 i2 : ineq) : bool :=
(i1.to_slope = i2.to_slope) && (same_quadrant i1 i2) && (i1.strict || bnot (i2.strict))
def clockwise_of (i1 i2 : ineq) : bool :=
i1.x*i2.y - i1.y*i2.x > 0
/--
True if the conjunction of i1 and i2 implies ninq
-/
def two_imply (i1 i2 : ineq) (ninq : ineq) : bool :=
(ninq.clockwise_of i1 && i2.clockwise_of ninq) || (i1.implies ninq) || (i2.implies ninq)
-- TODO
section
open tactic
-- TODO : add proof argument and move
meta def to_type (id : ineq) (lhs rhs : expr) : tactic expr :=
match id.to_slope with
| slope.horiz := id.to_comp.to_function rhs `(0 : ℚ) --, to_expr `(fake_ineq_to_expr_proof %%tp)
| slope.some m :=
-- let rhs' : expr := (if m=0 then `(0 : ℚ) else `(m*%%rhs : ℚ)) in
do rhs' ← to_expr (if m=0 then ``(0 : ℚ) else ``(%%(↑(reflect m) : expr)*%%rhs : ℚ)),
id.to_comp.to_function lhs rhs'
--to_expr `(fake_ineq_to_expr_proof %%tp)
end
end
end ineq
end polya
/-
TODO: move these to expr namespace?
-/
open polya tactic
meta def expr_to_ineq : expr → tactic (expr × expr × ineq)
| `(%%x ≤ (%%c : ℚ)*%%y) := do c' ← eval_expr rat c, return $ (x, y, ineq.of_comp_and_slope comp.le (slope.some c'))
| `(%%x < (%%c : ℚ)*%%y) := do c' ← eval_expr rat c, return $ (x, y, ineq.of_comp_and_slope comp.lt (slope.some c'))
| `(%%x ≥ (%%c : ℚ)*%%y) := do c' ← eval_expr rat c, return $ (x, y, ineq.of_comp_and_slope comp.ge (slope.some c'))
| `(%%x > (%%c : ℚ)*%%y) := do c' ← eval_expr rat c, return $ (x, y, ineq.of_comp_and_slope comp.gt (slope.some c'))
| _ := failed
meta def expr_to_eq : expr → tactic (expr × expr × ℚ)
| `(%%x = (%%c : ℚ)*%%y) := do c' ← eval_expr rat c, return $ (x, y, c')
| _ := failed
meta def expr_to_diseq : expr → tactic (expr × expr × ℚ)
| `(%%x ≠ (%%c : ℚ)*%%y) := do c' ← eval_expr rat c, return (x, y, c')
| _ := failed
-- for efficiency???
meta def expr_to_sign_aux : expr → tactic (expr × gen_comp)
| `(@eq ℚ (has_zero.zero ℚ) %%x) := return (x, gen_comp.eq)
| `((has_zero.zero ℚ) > %%x) := return (x, gen_comp.lt)
| `((has_zero.zero ℚ) < %%x) := return (x, gen_comp.gt)
| `((has_zero.zero ℚ) ≥ %%x) := return (x, gen_comp.le)
| `((has_zero.zero ℚ) ≤ %%x) := return (x, gen_comp.ge)
| `((has_zero.zero ℚ) ≠ %%x) := return (x, gen_comp.ne)
| _ := failed
meta def expr_to_sign : expr → tactic (expr × gen_comp)
| `(@eq ℚ %%x (has_zero.zero ℚ)) := return (x, gen_comp.eq)
| `(%%x > (has_zero.zero ℚ)) := return (x, gen_comp.gt)
| `(%%x < (has_zero.zero ℚ)) := return (x, gen_comp.lt)
| `(%%x ≥ (has_zero.zero ℚ)) := return (x, gen_comp.ge)
| `(%%x ≤ (has_zero.zero ℚ)) := return (x, gen_comp.le)
| `(%%x ≠ (has_zero.zero ℚ)) := return (x, gen_comp.ne)
| a := expr_to_sign_aux a
/-meta def add_comp_to_blackboard (e : expr) (b : blackboard) : tactic blackboard :=
(do (x, y, ie1) ← expr_to_ineq e,
id ← return $ ineq_data.mk ie1 (ineq_proof.hyp x y _ e),
-- trace "tac_add_ineq",
tac_add_ineq b id)
-- return (add_ineq id b).2)
<|>
(do (x, y, ie1) ← expr_to_eq e,
id ← return $ eq_data.mk ie1 (eq_proof.hyp x y _ e),
-- trace "tac_add_eq",
tac_add_eq b id)
--return (add_eq id b).2)
<|>
(do (x, c) ← expr_to_sign e,
sd ← return $ sign_data.mk c (sign_proof.hyp x _ e),
-- trace "calling tac-add-sign",
bb ← tac_add_sign b sd,
trace "tac_add_sign done", return bb)
<|>
fail "add_comp_to_blackboard failed"-/
meta def coeff_of_expr (ex : expr) : tactic (option ℚ × expr) :=
match ex with
| `(%%c * %%e) := if expr.is_numeral c then do q ← eval_expr ℚ c, return (some q, e) else return (none, ex)
| _ := return (none, ex)
end
|
caf48052e432283e47971c5f3cc6108c4e886b5e | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/geometry/euclidean/sphere.lean | 938a557c9c451421c0771daf6b01381d09f4fe6b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,383 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Manuel Candales. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Manuel Candales, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import geometry.euclidean.basic
import geometry.euclidean.triangle
/-!
# Spheres
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and angles
in spheres in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main theorems
* `mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_pi`: Intersecting Chords Theorem (Freek No. 55).
* `mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_zero`: Intersecting Secants Theorem.
* `mul_dist_add_mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical`: Ptolemy’s Theorem (Freek No. 95).
TODO: The current statement of Ptolemy’s theorem works around the lack of a "cyclic polygon" concept
in mathlib, which is what the theorem statement would naturally use (or two such concepts, since
both a strict version, where all vertices must be distinct, and a weak version, where consecutive
vertices may be equal, would be useful; Ptolemy's theorem should then use the weak one).
An API needs to be built around that concept, which would include:
- strict cyclic implies weak cyclic,
- weak cyclic and consecutive points distinct implies strict cyclic,
- weak/strict cyclic implies weak/strict cyclic for any subsequence,
- any three points on a sphere are weakly or strictly cyclic according to whether they are distinct,
- any number of points on a sphere intersected with a two-dimensional affine subspace are cyclic in
some order,
- a list of points is cyclic if and only if its reversal is,
- a list of points is cyclic if and only if any cyclic permutation is, while other permutations
are not when the points are distinct,
- a point P where the diagonals of a cyclic polygon cross exists (and is unique) with weak/strict
betweenness depending on weak/strict cyclicity,
- four points on a sphere with such a point P are cyclic in the appropriate order,
and so on.
-/
open real
open_locale euclidean_geometry real_inner_product_space real
variables {V : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V]
namespace inner_product_geometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on spheres in real inner product spaces
This section develops some results on spheres in real inner product spaces,
which are used to deduce corresponding results for Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
lemma mul_norm_eq_abs_sub_sq_norm {x y z : V}
(h₁ : ∃ k : ℝ, k ≠ 1 ∧ x + y = k • (x - y)) (h₂ : ‖z - y‖ = ‖z + y‖) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = |‖z + y‖ ^ 2 - ‖z - x‖ ^ 2| :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, hk_ne_one, hk⟩ := h₁,
let r := (k - 1)⁻¹ * (k + 1),
have hxy : x = r • y,
{ rw [← smul_smul, eq_inv_smul_iff₀ (sub_ne_zero.mpr hk_ne_one), ← sub_eq_zero],
calc (k - 1) • x - (k + 1) • y
= (k • x - x) - (k • y + y) : by simp_rw [sub_smul, add_smul, one_smul]
... = (k • x - k • y) - (x + y) : by simp_rw [← sub_sub, sub_right_comm]
... = k • (x - y) - (x + y) : by rw ← smul_sub k x y
... = 0 : sub_eq_zero.mpr hk.symm },
have hzy : ⟪z, y⟫ = 0,
by rwa [inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, ← norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two,
eq_comm],
have hzx : ⟪z, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [hxy, inner_smul_right, hzy, mul_zero],
calc ‖x - y‖ * ‖x + y‖
= ‖(r - 1) • y‖ * ‖(r + 1) • y‖ : by simp [sub_smul, add_smul, hxy]
... = ‖r - 1‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖r + 1‖ * ‖y‖) : by simp_rw [norm_smul]
... = ‖r - 1‖ * ‖r + 1‖ * ‖y‖ ^ 2 : by ring
... = |(r - 1) * (r + 1) * ‖y‖ ^ 2| : by simp [abs_mul]
... = |r ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2| : by ring_nf
... = |‖x‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2| : by simp [hxy, norm_smul, mul_pow, sq_abs]
... = |‖z + y‖ ^ 2 - ‖z - x‖ ^ 2| : by simp [norm_add_sq_real, norm_sub_sq_real,
hzy, hzx, abs_sub_comm],
end
end inner_product_geometry
namespace euclidean_geometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on spheres in Euclidean affine spaces
This section develops some results on spheres in Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
open inner_product_geometry
variables {P : Type*} [metric_space P] [normed_add_torsor V P]
include V
/-- If `P` is a point on the line `AB` and `Q` is equidistant from `A` and `B`, then
`AP * BP = abs (BQ ^ 2 - PQ ^ 2)`. -/
lemma mul_dist_eq_abs_sub_sq_dist {a b p q : P}
(hp : ∃ k : ℝ, k ≠ 1 ∧ b -ᵥ p = k • (a -ᵥ p)) (hq : dist a q = dist b q) :
dist a p * dist b p = |dist b q ^ 2 - dist p q ^ 2| :=
begin
let m : P := midpoint ℝ a b,
obtain ⟨v, h1, h2, h3⟩ := ⟨vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left, v a p m, v p q m, v a q m⟩,
have h : ∀ r, b -ᵥ r = (m -ᵥ r) + (m -ᵥ a) :=
λ r, by rw [midpoint_vsub_left, ← right_vsub_midpoint, add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel],
iterate 4 { rw dist_eq_norm_vsub V },
rw [← h1, ← h2, h, h],
rw [← h1, h] at hp,
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V a q, dist_eq_norm_vsub V b q, ← h3, h] at hq,
exact mul_norm_eq_abs_sub_sq_norm hp hq,
end
/-- If `A`, `B`, `C`, `D` are cospherical and `P` is on both lines `AB` and `CD`, then
`AP * BP = CP * DP`. -/
lemma mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical {a b c d p : P}
(h : cospherical ({a, b, c, d} : set P))
(hapb : ∃ k₁ : ℝ, k₁ ≠ 1 ∧ b -ᵥ p = k₁ • (a -ᵥ p))
(hcpd : ∃ k₂ : ℝ, k₂ ≠ 1 ∧ d -ᵥ p = k₂ • (c -ᵥ p)) :
dist a p * dist b p = dist c p * dist d p :=
begin
obtain ⟨q, r, h'⟩ := (cospherical_def {a, b, c, d}).mp h,
obtain ⟨ha, hb, hc, hd⟩ := ⟨h' a _, h' b _, h' c _, h' d _⟩,
{ rw ← hd at hc,
rw ← hb at ha,
rw [mul_dist_eq_abs_sub_sq_dist hapb ha, hb, mul_dist_eq_abs_sub_sq_dist hcpd hc, hd] },
all_goals { simp },
end
/-- **Intersecting Chords Theorem**. -/
theorem mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_pi {a b c d p : P}
(h : cospherical ({a, b, c, d} : set P))
(hapb : ∠ a p b = π) (hcpd : ∠ c p d = π) :
dist a p * dist b p = dist c p * dist d p :=
begin
obtain ⟨-, k₁, _, hab⟩ := angle_eq_pi_iff.mp hapb,
obtain ⟨-, k₂, _, hcd⟩ := angle_eq_pi_iff.mp hcpd,
exact mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical h ⟨k₁, (by linarith), hab⟩ ⟨k₂, (by linarith), hcd⟩,
end
/-- **Intersecting Secants Theorem**. -/
theorem mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_zero {a b c d p : P}
(h : cospherical ({a, b, c, d} : set P))
(hab : a ≠ b) (hcd : c ≠ d) (hapb : ∠ a p b = 0) (hcpd : ∠ c p d = 0) :
dist a p * dist b p = dist c p * dist d p :=
begin
obtain ⟨-, k₁, -, hab₁⟩ := angle_eq_zero_iff.mp hapb,
obtain ⟨-, k₂, -, hcd₁⟩ := angle_eq_zero_iff.mp hcpd,
refine mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical h ⟨k₁, _, hab₁⟩ ⟨k₂, _, hcd₁⟩;
by_contra hnot;
simp only [not_not, *, one_smul] at *,
exacts [hab (vsub_left_cancel hab₁).symm, hcd (vsub_left_cancel hcd₁).symm],
end
/-- **Ptolemy’s Theorem**. -/
theorem mul_dist_add_mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical {a b c d p : P}
(h : cospherical ({a, b, c, d} : set P))
(hapc : ∠ a p c = π) (hbpd : ∠ b p d = π) :
dist a b * dist c d + dist b c * dist d a = dist a c * dist b d :=
begin
have h' : cospherical ({a, c, b, d} : set P), { rwa set.insert_comm c b {d} },
have hmul := mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_pi h' hapc hbpd,
have hbp := left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi hbpd,
have h₁ : dist c d = dist c p / dist b p * dist a b,
{ rw [dist_mul_of_eq_angle_of_dist_mul b p a c p d, dist_comm a b],
{ rw [angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi hbpd hapc, angle_comm] },
all_goals { field_simp [mul_comm, hmul] } },
have h₂ : dist d a = dist a p / dist b p * dist b c,
{ rw [dist_mul_of_eq_angle_of_dist_mul c p b d p a, dist_comm c b],
{ rwa [angle_comm, angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi], rwa angle_comm },
all_goals { field_simp [mul_comm, hmul] } },
have h₃ : dist d p = dist a p * dist c p / dist b p, { field_simp [mul_comm, hmul] },
have h₄ : ∀ x y : ℝ, x * (y * x) = x * x * y := λ x y, by rw [mul_left_comm, mul_comm],
field_simp [h₁, h₂, dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi hbpd, h₃, hbp, dist_comm a b,
h₄, ← sq, dist_sq_mul_dist_add_dist_sq_mul_dist b, hapc],
end
end euclidean_geometry
|
feb7bf409ea73aed6a544b95919746bac99d87dd | f78878388c67ef30448cc1a5d09622d13222f1aa | /Dockerfile.lean | ba57e4779890dcb312d85364ed3b6f3fe7089801 | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | axx/cpp-web-dev | fcfdf4fabab0bd2ceb67df5f9655d41dfd503de7 | d6637afda8d02f0eb4148213a839150c63030945 | refs/heads/master | 1,589,050,146,360 | 1,558,010,448,000 | 1,558,010,448,000 | 181,356,041 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 151 | lean | FROM ubuntu:18.04
LABEL maintainer="allister.sanchez@gmail.com"
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get upgrade -y
RUN apt-get install -y libboost-system1.65.1
|
58b120a43951f5cd6ccd96e1fabf635748bb689b | ed544fdbb470075305eb2a01b0491ce8a6ba05c8 | /src/certigrad/label.lean | c4084f9b5452ad5b4741e253264003cde2bdf7b1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gazimahmud/certigrad | d12caa30c6fc3adf9bb1fcd61479af0faad8b6c3 | 38cc6377dbd5025eb074188a1acd02147a92bdba | refs/heads/master | 1,606,977,759,336 | 1,498,686,571,000 | 1,498,686,571,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,399 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Daniel Selsam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Daniel Selsam
Labels.
Note: this file is just because strings are slow and cumbersome in current Lean.
-/
import .tactics
namespace certigrad
inductive label : Type
| default
| batch_start
| W_encode, W_encode₁, W_encode₂, h_encode, W_encode_μ, W_encode_logσ₂
| W_decode, W_decode₁, W_decode₂, h_decode, W_decode_p
| μ, σ, σ₂, log_σ₂, z, encoding_loss, decoding_loss, ε, x, p, x_all
namespace label
instance : decidable_eq label := by tactic.mk_dec_eq_instance
def to_str : label → string
| default := "<default>"
| batch_start := "batch_start"
| W_encode := "W_encode"
| W_encode₁ := "W_encode_1"
| W_encode₂ := "W_encode_2"
| h_encode := "h_encode"
| W_encode_μ := "W_encode_mu"
| W_encode_logσ₂ := "W_encode_logs₂"
| W_decode := "W_decode"
| W_decode₁ := "W_decode_1"
| W_decode₂ := "W_decode_2"
| h_decode := "h_decode"
| W_decode_p := "W_decode_p"
| μ := "mu"
| σ := "sigma"
| σ₂ := "sigma_sq"
| log_σ₂ := "log_s₂"
| z := "z"
| encoding_loss := "encoding_loss"
| decoding_loss := "decoding_loss"
| ε := "eps"
| x := "x"
| p := "p"
| x_all := "x_all"
instance : has_to_string label := ⟨to_str⟩
def to_nat : label → ℕ
| default := 0
| batch_start := 1
| W_encode := 2
| W_encode₁ := 3
| W_encode₂ := 4
| h_encode := 5
| W_encode_μ := 6
| W_encode_logσ₂ := 7
| W_decode := 8
| W_decode₁ := 9
| W_decode₂ := 10
| h_decode := 11
| W_decode_p := 12
| μ := 13
| σ := 14
| σ₂ := 15
| log_σ₂ := 16
| z := 17
| encoding_loss := 18
| decoding_loss := 19
| ε := 20
| x := 21
| p := 22
| x_all := 23
section proofs
open tactic
meta def prove_neq_case_core : tactic unit :=
do H ← intro `H,
dunfold_at [`certigrad.label.to_nat] H,
H ← get_local `H,
ty ← infer_type H,
nty ← return $ expr.app (expr.const `not []) ty,
assert `H_not nty,
prove_nats_neq,
exfalso,
get_local `H_not >>= λ H_not, exact (expr.app H_not H)
lemma label_eq_of_to_nat {x y : label} : x = y → to_nat x = to_nat y :=
begin
intro H,
subst H,
end
end proofs
def less_than (x y : label) : Prop := x^.to_nat < y^.to_nat
instance : has_lt label := ⟨less_than⟩
instance decidable_less_than (x y : label) : decidable (x < y) := by apply nat.decidable_lt
end label
end certigrad
|
0f5695155d4d23479ab07224f09fc2ab51c9234b | e9dbaaae490bc072444e3021634bf73664003760 | /src/Background/Vec.lean | cc1c3403de2fa76b695d2c0d02d72d4324697654 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | liaofei1128/geometry | 566d8bfe095ce0c0113d36df90635306c60e975b | 3dd128e4eec8008764bb94e18b932f9ffd66e6b3 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,996,510,399 | 1,581,454,543,000 | 1,583,337,839,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,662 | lean | import Geo.Util
import Geo.Background.Nat
import Geo.Background.List
def Vec (X : Type) (n : Nat) : Type :=
{ xs : List X // xs.length == n }
namespace Vec
variables {X Y Z : Type} {n n₁ n₂ : Nat}
axiom get : Vec X n → Fin n → X
-- TODO(dselsam): unsound
noncomputable def get₀ (v : Vec X n) : X := v.get ⟨0, WIP⟩
noncomputable def get₁ (v : Vec X n) : X := v.get ⟨1, WIP⟩
noncomputable def get₂ (v : Vec X n) : X := v.get ⟨2, WIP⟩
noncomputable def get₃ (v : Vec X n) : X := v.get ⟨3, WIP⟩
axiom fromFunc (f : Fin n → X) : Vec X n
axiom rcons (v : Vec X n) (x : X) : Vec X (n+1)
axiom getRest (v : Vec X n) (i : Fin n) : Vec X n.pred
axiom fromFin {X : Type} {n : Nat} (f : Fin n → X) : Vec X n
def empty : Vec X 0 :=
⟨ [], rfl ⟩
def take (k : Fin n) (xs : Vec X n) : Vec X k.val :=
⟨ xs.val.take k.val, WIP ⟩
def drop (k : Fin n) (xs : Vec X n) : Vec X (n - k.val) :=
⟨ xs.val.drop k.val, WIP ⟩
def append (xs₁ : Vec X n₁) (xs₂ : Vec X n₂) : Vec X (n₁ + n₂) :=
⟨ xs₁.val ++ xs₂.val, WIP ⟩
def range (n : Nat) : Vec (Fin n) n :=
⟨ List.rangeFin n, WIP ⟩
def map (f : X -> Y) (xs : Vec X n) : Vec Y n :=
⟨ List.map f xs.val, WIP ⟩
def map₂ (f : X → Y → Z) (xs : Vec X n) (ys : Vec Y n) : Vec Z n :=
⟨ List.map₂ f xs.val ys.val, WIP ⟩
def zip (xs: Vec X n) (ys : Vec Y n) : Vec (Prod X Y) n :=
⟨ List.zip xs.val ys.val, WIP ⟩
def sum [HasZero X] [HasAdd X] (xs : Vec X n) : X :=
List.sum xs.val
def prod [HasOne X] [HasMul X] (xs : Vec X n) : X :=
List.prod xs.val
def cycle (k : Fin n) (xs : Vec X n) : Vec X n :=
cast WIP ((xs.drop k).append (xs.take k))
def cycle₁ (xs : Vec X n) : Vec X n :=
cast WIP ((xs.drop ⟨1, WIP⟩).append (xs.take ⟨1, WIP⟩))
def cycle₂ (xs : Vec X n) : Vec X n :=
cast WIP ((xs.drop ⟨2, WIP⟩).append (xs.take ⟨2, WIP⟩))
def cycles (xs : Vec X n) : Vec (Vec X n) n :=
(range n).map (λ (k : Fin n) => cycle k xs)
def cyclicSum [HasZero Y] [HasAdd Y] (xs : Vec X n) (f : Vec X n → Y) : Y :=
(xs.cycles.map f).sum
def subvecs (k : Fin n) (xs : Vec X n) : Vec (Vec X k.val) (n.choose k) :=
cast WIP (xs.val.sublists k.val)
axiom mapReducePairs (f : X → X → Y) (xs : Vec X n) : Vec Y n
def replicate (n : Nat) (x : X) : Vec X n :=
⟨ List.replicate n x, WIP ⟩
axiom mem : Vec X n → X → Prop
axiom hasSubvec {k : Nat} : Vec X n → Vec X k → Prop
axiom allDistinct {n : Nat} : Vec X n → Prop
axiom allEq {n : Nat} : Vec X n → Prop
axiom allP {n : Nat} : Vec X n → (X → Prop) → Prop
def lt (lt : X → X → Bool) (xs ys : Vec X n) : Bool :=
List.lt lt xs.val ys.val
end Vec
|
7ab4808980125f338d8f1f82ef9ed2cde067f444 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/compiler/strictAndOr.lean | d65345453dcc0f8700a43f2c9024e82a7b1fffda | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 312 | lean |
def main : IO Unit :=
IO.println (strictOr false false) *>
IO.println (strictOr false true) *>
IO.println (strictOr true false) *>
IO.println (strictOr true true) *>
IO.println (strictAnd false false) *>
IO.println (strictAnd false true) *>
IO.println (strictAnd true false) *>
IO.println (strictAnd true true)
|
72ffb68c79d3c031aea3488cfedb12256342cb52 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/gcd_monoid/finset.lean | c53ac2680cf0012abbbcce1eab9268278882ef5e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,019 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import data.finset.fold
import algebra.gcd_monoid.multiset
/-!
# GCD and LCM operations on finsets
## Main definitions
- `finset.gcd` - the greatest common denominator of a `finset` of elements of a `gcd_monoid`
- `finset.lcm` - the least common multiple of a `finset` of elements of a `gcd_monoid`
## Implementation notes
Many of the proofs use the lemmas `gcd.def` and `lcm.def`, which relate `finset.gcd`
and `finset.lcm` to `multiset.gcd` and `multiset.lcm`.
TODO: simplify with a tactic and `data.finset.lattice`
## Tags
finset, gcd
-/
variables {α β γ : Type*}
namespace finset
open multiset
variables [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] [nontrivial α] [gcd_monoid α]
/-! ### lcm -/
section lcm
/-- Least common multiple of a finite set -/
def lcm (s : finset β) (f : β → α) : α := s.fold gcd_monoid.lcm 1 f
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset β} {f : β → α}
lemma lcm_def : s.lcm f = (s.1.map f).lcm := rfl
@[simp] lemma lcm_empty : (∅ : finset β).lcm f = 1 :=
fold_empty
@[simp] lemma lcm_dvd_iff {a : α} : s.lcm f ∣ a ↔ (∀b ∈ s, f b ∣ a) :=
begin
apply iff.trans multiset.lcm_dvd,
simp only [multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp_distrib],
exact ⟨λ k b hb, k _ _ hb rfl, λ k a' b hb h, h ▸ k _ hb⟩,
end
lemma lcm_dvd {a : α} : (∀b ∈ s, f b ∣ a) → s.lcm f ∣ a :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2
lemma dvd_lcm {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ∣ s.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl _) _ hb
@[simp] lemma lcm_insert [decidable_eq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : finset β).lcm f = gcd_monoid.lcm (f b) (s.lcm f) :=
begin
by_cases h : b ∈ s,
{ rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(lcm_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.lcm f) (multiset.normalize_lcm (s.1.map f))).2 (dvd_lcm h)] },
apply fold_insert h,
end
@[simp] lemma lcm_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : finset β).lcm f = normalize (f b) :=
multiset.lcm_singleton
@[simp] lemma normalize_lcm : normalize (s.lcm f) = s.lcm f := by simp [lcm_def]
lemma lcm_union [decidable_eq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).lcm f = gcd_monoid.lcm (s₁.lcm f) (s₂.lcm f) :=
finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, lcm_empty, lcm_one_left, normalize_lcm]) $ λ a s has ih,
by rw [insert_union, lcm_insert, lcm_insert, ih, lcm_assoc]
theorem lcm_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.lcm f = s₂.lcm g :=
by { subst hs, exact finset.fold_congr hfg }
lemma lcm_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.lcm f ∣ s.lcm g :=
lcm_dvd (λ b hb, dvd_trans (h b hb) (dvd_lcm hb))
lemma lcm_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.lcm f ∣ s₂.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd $ assume b hb, dvd_lcm (h hb)
end lcm
/-! ### gcd -/
section gcd
/-- Greatest common divisor of a finite set -/
def gcd (s : finset β) (f : β → α) : α := s.fold gcd_monoid.gcd 0 f
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset β} {f : β → α}
lemma gcd_def : s.gcd f = (s.1.map f).gcd := rfl
@[simp] lemma gcd_empty : (∅ : finset β).gcd f = 0 :=
fold_empty
lemma dvd_gcd_iff {a : α} : a ∣ s.gcd f ↔ ∀b ∈ s, a ∣ f b :=
begin
apply iff.trans multiset.dvd_gcd,
simp only [multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp_distrib],
exact ⟨λ k b hb, k _ _ hb rfl, λ k a' b hb h, h ▸ k _ hb⟩,
end
lemma gcd_dvd {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : s.gcd f ∣ f b :=
dvd_gcd_iff.1 (dvd_refl _) _ hb
lemma dvd_gcd {a : α} : (∀b ∈ s, a ∣ f b) → a ∣ s.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd_iff.2
@[simp] lemma gcd_insert [decidable_eq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : finset β).gcd f = gcd_monoid.gcd (f b) (s.gcd f) :=
begin
by_cases h : b ∈ s,
{ rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(gcd_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.gcd f) (multiset.normalize_gcd (s.1.map f))).2 (gcd_dvd h)] ,},
apply fold_insert h,
end
@[simp] lemma gcd_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : finset β).gcd f = normalize (f b) :=
multiset.gcd_singleton
@[simp] lemma normalize_gcd : normalize (s.gcd f) = s.gcd f := by simp [gcd_def]
lemma gcd_union [decidable_eq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).gcd f = gcd_monoid.gcd (s₁.gcd f) (s₂.gcd f) :=
finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, gcd_empty, gcd_zero_left, normalize_gcd]) $
λ a s has ih, by rw [insert_union, gcd_insert, gcd_insert, ih, gcd_assoc]
theorem gcd_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.gcd f = s₂.gcd g :=
by { subst hs, exact finset.fold_congr hfg }
lemma gcd_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.gcd f ∣ s.gcd g :=
dvd_gcd (λ b hb, dvd_trans (gcd_dvd hb) (h b hb))
lemma gcd_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.gcd f ∣ s₁.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd $ assume b hb, gcd_dvd (h hb)
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff : s.gcd f = 0 ↔ ∀ (x : β), x ∈ s → f x = 0 :=
begin
rw [gcd_def, multiset.gcd_eq_zero_iff],
split; intro h,
{ intros b bs,
apply h (f b),
simp only [multiset.mem_map, mem_def.1 bs],
use b,
simp [mem_def.1 bs] },
{ intros a as,
rw multiset.mem_map at as,
rcases as with ⟨b, ⟨bs, rfl⟩⟩,
apply h b (mem_def.1 bs) }
end
lemma gcd_eq_gcd_filter_ne_zero [decidable_pred (λ (x : β), f x = 0)] :
s.gcd f = (s.filter (λ x, f x ≠ 0)).gcd f :=
begin
classical,
transitivity ((s.filter (λ x, f x = 0)) ∪ (s.filter (λ x, f x ≠ 0))).gcd f,
{ rw filter_union_filter_neg_eq },
rw gcd_union,
transitivity gcd_monoid.gcd (0 : α) _,
{ refine congr (congr rfl _) rfl,
apply s.induction_on, { simp },
intros a s has h,
rw filter_insert,
split_ifs with h1; simp [h, h1], },
simp [gcd_zero_left, normalize_gcd],
end
lemma gcd_mul_left {a : α} : s.gcd (λ x, a * f x) = normalize a * s.gcd f :=
begin
classical,
apply s.induction_on,
{ simp },
intros b t hbt h,
rw [gcd_insert, gcd_insert, h, ← gcd_mul_left],
apply gcd_eq_of_associated_right,
apply associated_mul_mul _ (associated.refl _),
apply normalize_associated,
end
lemma gcd_mul_right {a : α} : s.gcd (λ x, f x * a) = s.gcd f * normalize a :=
begin
classical,
apply s.induction_on,
{ simp },
intros b t hbt h,
rw [gcd_insert, gcd_insert, h, ← gcd_mul_right],
apply gcd_eq_of_associated_right,
apply associated_mul_mul (associated.refl _),
apply normalize_associated,
end
end gcd
end finset
namespace finset
section integral_domain
variables [nontrivial β] [integral_domain α] [gcd_monoid α]
lemma gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub {s : finset β} {f g : β → α} {a : α}
(h : ∀ x : β, x ∈ s → a ∣ f x - g x) :
gcd_monoid.gcd a (s.gcd f) = gcd_monoid.gcd a (s.gcd g) :=
begin
classical,
revert h,
apply s.induction_on,
{ simp },
intros b s bs hi h,
rw [gcd_insert, gcd_insert, gcd_comm (f b), ← gcd_assoc, hi (λ x hx, h _ (mem_insert_of_mem hx)),
gcd_comm a, gcd_assoc, gcd_comm a (gcd_monoid.gcd _ _),
gcd_comm (g b), gcd_assoc _ _ a, gcd_comm _ a],
refine congr rfl _,
apply gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right (h _ (mem_insert_self _ _)),
end
end integral_domain
end finset
|
d5ffad0ea3db5557931046aafee31f472bfc1c08 | a6f55abce20abcd06e718cb3e5fba7bf8a230fa1 | /topic/body_part.lean | 74cb2dda4b31ab5317770cf2c41a045907002e0c | [] | no_license | sonna0909/abc | b8a53e906d4d000d1f2347173a1cd4221757fabf | ff7b4c621cdf6d53937f2d1b6def28de2085a2aa | refs/heads/master | 1,599,114,664,248 | 1,573,634,309,000 | 1,573,634,309,000 | 219,406,484 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,629 | lean | [
{
"key": "face",
"title": "Face",
"spelling": "/feɪs/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "face1",
"title": "Her face is oval",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "head",
"title": "Head",
"spelling": "/hɛd/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "head1",
"title": "This is a head",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "hair",
"title": "Hair",
"spelling": "/heəʳ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "hair1",
"title": "My hair is black",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "ear",
"title": "Ear",
"spelling": "/ɪəʳ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "ears",
"title": "These are ears",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "forehead",
"title": "Forehead",
"spelling": "/ˈfɒr.ɪd/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "forehead1",
"title": "This is the forehead",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "cheek",
"title": "Cheek",
"spelling": "/tʃiːk/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "cheek1",
"title": "This is a cheek",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "nose",
"title": "Nose",
"spelling": "/nəʊz/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "nose1",
"title": "This is a nose",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "lip",
"title": "Lip",
"spelling": "/lɪp/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "lip1",
"title": "Her lip is red",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "tongue",
"title": "Tongue",
"spelling": "/tʌŋ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "tongue1",
"title": "This is the tongue",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "tooth",
"title": "tooth",
"spelling": "/tuːθ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "teeth",
"title": "These are teeth",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "eye",
"title": "Eye",
"spelling": "/aɪ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "eyes",
"title": "These are eyes",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "eyebrow",
"title": "Eyebrow",
"spelling": "/ˈaɪ.braʊ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "eyebrow1",
"title": "Her eyebrow is beautiful",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "eyelashes",
"title": "eyelashes",
"spelling": "/ˈaɪ.læʃis/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "eyelashes1",
"title": "Her eyelashes are curved",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "mouth",
"title": "Mouth",
"spelling": "/maʊθ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "mouth1",
"title": "This is a mouth",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "chin",
"title": "Chin",
"spelling": "/tʃɪn/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "chin1",
"title": "This is the chin",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "neck",
"title": "Neck",
"spelling": "/nek/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "neck1",
"title": "This is the neck",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "shoulder",
"title": "Shoulder",
"spelling": "/ˈʃəʊl.dəʳ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "shoulders",
"title": "These are shoulders",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "elbow",
"title": "Elbow",
"spelling": "/ˈel.bəʊ/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "elbows",
"title": "These are elbows",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "arm",
"title": "Arm",
"spelling": "/ɑːm/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "arm1",
"title": "This is an arm",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "forearm",
"title": "Forearm",
"spelling": "/ˈfɔː.rɑːm/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "forearm1",
"title": "This is a forearm",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "wrist",
"title": "Wrist",
"spelling": "/rist/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "wrist1",
"title": "These are wrists",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "hand",
"title": "Hand",
"spelling": "/hænd/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "hands",
"title": "These are hands",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "finger",
"title": "Finger",
"spelling": "/ˈfɪŋɡə(r)/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "fingers",
"title": "These are fingers",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "armpit",
"title": "Armpit",
"spelling": "/ˈɑːm.pɪt/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "armpit1",
"title": "This is armpit",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "back",
"title": "Back",
"spelling": "/bæk/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "back1",
"title": "This is the back",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "chest",
"title": "Chest",
"spelling": "/tʃest/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "chest1",
"title": "This is the chest",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "abdomen",
"title": "Abdomen",
"spelling": "/ˈæb.də.mən/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "abdomen1",
"title": "This is the abdomen",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "buttocks",
"title": "Buttocks",
"spelling": "/’bʌtək/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "buttocks1",
"title": "This is buttocks",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "hip",
"title": "Hip",
"spelling": "/hɪp/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "hip1",
"title": "This is hip",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "leg",
"title": "Leg",
"spelling": "/lɛg/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "legs",
"title": "These are legs",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "knee",
"title": "Knee",
"spelling": "/niː/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "knees",
"title": "These are knees",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "foot",
"title": "Foot",
"spelling": "/fʊt/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "foot",
"title": "These are foot",
"spelling": ""
}
]
},
{
"key": "toe",
"title": "Toe",
"spelling": "/tou/",
"subs": [
{
"key": "toes",
"title": "These are toes",
"spelling": ""
}
]
}
]
|
3713493ede52a8f6da70b17923e2c4ef32d85324 | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/measure_theory/measure/haar_of_basis.lean | dfbf34e1b7ff72857ec6e628c766df7e2f228131 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,595 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import measure_theory.measure.haar
import analysis.inner_product_space.pi_L2
/-!
# Additive Haar measure constructed from a basis
Given a basis of a finite-dimensional real vector space, we define the corresponding Lebesgue
measure, which gives measure `1` to the parallelepiped spanned by the basis.
## Main definitions
* `parallelepiped v` is the parallelepiped spanned by a finite family of vectors.
* `basis.parallelepiped` is the parallelepiped associated to a basis, seen as a compact set with
nonempty interior.
* `basis.add_haar` is the Lebesgue measure associated to a basis, giving measure `1` to the
corresponding parallelepiped.
In particular, we declare a `measure_space` instance on any finite-dimensional inner product space,
by using the Lebesgue measure associated to some orthonormal basis (which is in fact independent
of the basis).
-/
open set topological_space measure_theory measure_theory.measure finite_dimensional
open_locale big_operators pointwise
noncomputable theory
variables {ι ι' E F : Type*} [fintype ι] [fintype ι']
section add_comm_group
variables [add_comm_group E] [module ℝ E] [add_comm_group F] [module ℝ F]
/-- The closed parallelepiped spanned by a finite family of vectors. -/
def parallelepiped (v : ι → E) : set E :=
(λ (t : ι → ℝ), ∑ i, t i • v i) '' (Icc 0 1)
lemma mem_parallelepiped_iff (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
x ∈ parallelepiped v ↔ ∃ (t : ι → ℝ) (ht : t ∈ Icc (0 : ι → ℝ) 1), x = ∑ i, t i • v i :=
by simp [parallelepiped, eq_comm]
lemma image_parallelepiped (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] F) (v : ι → E) :
f '' (parallelepiped v) = parallelepiped (f ∘ v) :=
begin
simp only [parallelepiped, ← image_comp],
congr' 1 with t,
simp only [function.comp_app, linear_map.map_sum, linear_map.map_smulₛₗ, ring_hom.id_apply],
end
/-- Reindexing a family of vectors does not change their parallelepiped. -/
@[simp] lemma parallelepiped_comp_equiv (v : ι → E) (e : ι' ≃ ι) :
parallelepiped (v ∘ e) = parallelepiped v :=
begin
simp only [parallelepiped],
let K : (ι' → ℝ) ≃ (ι → ℝ) := equiv.Pi_congr_left' (λ (a : ι'), ℝ) e,
have : Icc (0 : (ι → ℝ)) 1 = K '' (Icc (0 : (ι' → ℝ)) 1),
{ rw ← equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image,
ext x,
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_Icc, pi.le_def, pi.zero_apply, equiv.Pi_congr_left'_apply,
pi.one_apply],
refine ⟨λ h, ⟨λ i, _, λ i, _⟩, λ h, ⟨λ i, h.1 (e.symm i), λ i, h.2 (e.symm i)⟩⟩,
{ simpa only [equiv.symm_apply_apply] using h.1 (e i) },
{ simpa only [equiv.symm_apply_apply] using h.2 (e i) } },
rw [this, ← image_comp],
congr' 1 with x,
simpa only [orthonormal_basis.coe_reindex, function.comp_app, equiv.symm_apply_apply,
equiv.Pi_congr_left'_apply, equiv.apply_symm_apply]
using (e.symm.sum_comp (λ (i : ι'), x i • v (e i))).symm,
end
/- The parallelepiped associated to an orthonormal basis of `ℝ` is either `[0, 1]` or `[-1, 0]`. -/
lemma parallelepiped_orthonormal_basis_one_dim (b : orthonormal_basis ι ℝ ℝ) :
parallelepiped b = Icc 0 1 ∨ parallelepiped b = Icc (-1) 0 :=
begin
have e : ι ≃ fin 1,
{ apply fintype.equiv_fin_of_card_eq,
simp only [← finrank_eq_card_basis b.to_basis, finrank_self] },
have B : parallelepiped (b.reindex e) = parallelepiped b,
{ convert parallelepiped_comp_equiv b e.symm,
ext i,
simp only [orthonormal_basis.coe_reindex] },
rw ← B,
let F : ℝ → (fin 1 → ℝ) := λ t, (λ i, t),
have A : Icc (0 : fin 1 → ℝ) 1 = F '' (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1),
{ apply subset.antisymm,
{ assume x hx,
refine ⟨x 0, ⟨hx.1 0, hx.2 0⟩, _⟩,
ext j,
simp only [subsingleton.elim j 0] },
{ rintros x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨λ j, hy.1, λ j, hy.2⟩ } },
rcases orthonormal_basis_one_dim (b.reindex e) with H|H,
{ left,
simp only [H, parallelepiped, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one, A,
finset.sum_singleton, ←image_comp, image_id', finset.univ_unique], },
{ right,
simp only [H, parallelepiped, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one],
rw A,
simp only [←image_comp, mul_neg, mul_one, finset.sum_singleton, image_neg, preimage_neg_Icc,
neg_zero, finset.univ_unique] },
end
lemma parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment (v : ι → E) : parallelepiped v = ∑ i, segment ℝ 0 (v i) :=
begin
ext,
simp only [mem_parallelepiped_iff, set.mem_finset_sum, finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left,
segment_eq_image, smul_zero, zero_add, ←set.pi_univ_Icc, set.mem_univ_pi],
split,
{ rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨t • v, λ i, ⟨t i, ht _, by simp⟩, rfl⟩ },
rintro ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩,
change ∀ i, _ at hg,
choose t ht hg using hg,
refine ⟨t, ht, _⟩,
simp_rw hg,
end
lemma convex_parallelepiped (v : ι → E) : convex ℝ (parallelepiped v) :=
begin
rw parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment,
-- TODO: add `convex.sum` to match `convex.add`
let : add_submonoid (set E) :=
{ carrier := { s | convex ℝ s}, zero_mem' := convex_singleton _, add_mem' := λ x y, convex.add },
exact this.sum_mem (λ i hi, convex_segment _ _),
end
/-- A `parallelepiped` is the convex hull of its vertices -/
lemma parallelepiped_eq_convex_hull (v : ι → E) :
parallelepiped v = convex_hull ℝ (∑ i, {(0 : E), v i}) :=
begin
-- TODO: add `convex_hull_sum` to match `convex_hull_add`
let : set E →+ set E :=
{ to_fun := convex_hull ℝ,
map_zero' := convex_hull_singleton _,
map_add' := convex_hull_add },
simp_rw [parallelepiped_eq_sum_segment, ←convex_hull_pair],
exact (this.map_sum _ _).symm,
end
/-- The axis aligned parallelepiped over `ι → ℝ` is a cuboid. -/
lemma parallelepiped_single [decidable_eq ι] (a : ι → ℝ) :
parallelepiped (λ i, pi.single i (a i)) = set.uIcc 0 a :=
begin
ext,
simp_rw [set.uIcc, mem_parallelepiped_iff, set.mem_Icc, pi.le_def, ←forall_and_distrib,
pi.inf_apply, pi.sup_apply, ←pi.single_smul', pi.one_apply, pi.zero_apply, ←pi.smul_apply',
finset.univ_sum_single (_ : ι → ℝ)],
split,
{ rintros ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ i,
specialize ht i,
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, pi.mul_apply],
cases le_total (a i) 0 with hai hai,
{ rw [sup_eq_left.mpr hai, inf_eq_right.mpr hai],
exact ⟨le_mul_of_le_one_left hai ht.2, mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos ht.1 hai⟩ },
{ rw [sup_eq_right.mpr hai, inf_eq_left.mpr hai],
exact ⟨mul_nonneg ht.1 hai, mul_le_of_le_one_left hai ht.2⟩ } },
{ intro h,
refine ⟨λ i, x i / a i, λ i, _, funext $ λ i, _⟩,
{ specialize h i,
cases le_total (a i) 0 with hai hai,
{ rw [sup_eq_left.mpr hai, inf_eq_right.mpr hai] at h,
exact ⟨div_nonneg_of_nonpos h.2 hai, div_le_one_of_ge h.1 hai⟩ },
{ rw [sup_eq_right.mpr hai, inf_eq_left.mpr hai] at h,
exact ⟨div_nonneg h.1 hai, div_le_one_of_le h.2 hai⟩ } },
{ specialize h i,
simp only [smul_eq_mul, pi.mul_apply],
cases eq_or_ne (a i) 0 with hai hai,
{ rw [hai, inf_idem, sup_idem, ←le_antisymm_iff] at h,
rw [hai, ← h, zero_div, zero_mul] },
{ rw div_mul_cancel _ hai } } },
end
end add_comm_group
section normed_space
variables [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
/-- The parallelepiped spanned by a basis, as a compact set with nonempty interior. -/
def basis.parallelepiped (b : basis ι ℝ E) : positive_compacts E :=
{ carrier := parallelepiped b,
is_compact' := is_compact_Icc.image (continuous_finset_sum finset.univ
(λ (i : ι) (H : i ∈ finset.univ), (continuous_apply i).smul continuous_const)),
interior_nonempty' :=
begin
suffices H : set.nonempty (interior (b.equiv_funL.symm.to_homeomorph '' (Icc 0 1))),
{ dsimp only [parallelepiped],
convert H,
ext t,
exact (b.equiv_fun_symm_apply t).symm },
have A : set.nonempty (interior (Icc (0 : ι → ℝ) 1)),
{ rw [← pi_univ_Icc, interior_pi_set (@finite_univ ι _)],
simp only [univ_pi_nonempty_iff, pi.zero_apply, pi.one_apply, interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo,
zero_lt_one, implies_true_iff] },
rwa [← homeomorph.image_interior, nonempty_image_iff],
end }
variables [measurable_space E] [borel_space E]
/-- The Lebesgue measure associated to a basis, giving measure `1` to the parallelepiped spanned
by the basis. -/
@[irreducible] def basis.add_haar (b : basis ι ℝ E) : measure E :=
measure.add_haar_measure b.parallelepiped
instance is_add_haar_measure_basis_add_haar (b : basis ι ℝ E) :
is_add_haar_measure b.add_haar :=
by { rw basis.add_haar, exact measure.is_add_haar_measure_add_haar_measure _ }
lemma basis.add_haar_self (b : basis ι ℝ E) : b.add_haar (parallelepiped b) = 1 :=
by { rw [basis.add_haar], exact add_haar_measure_self }
end normed_space
/-- A finite dimensional inner product space has a canonical measure, the Lebesgue measure giving
volume `1` to the parallelepiped spanned by any orthonormal basis. We define the measure using
some arbitrary choice of orthonormal basis. The fact that it works with any orthonormal basis
is proved in `orthonormal_basis.volume_parallelepiped`. -/
@[priority 100] instance measure_space_of_inner_product_space
[normed_add_comm_group E] [inner_product_space ℝ E] [finite_dimensional ℝ E]
[measurable_space E] [borel_space E] :
measure_space E :=
{ volume := (std_orthonormal_basis ℝ E).to_basis.add_haar }
/- This instance should not be necessary, but Lean has difficulties to find it in product
situations if we do not declare it explicitly. -/
instance real.measure_space : measure_space ℝ := by apply_instance
/-! # Miscellaneous instances for `euclidean_space`
In combination with `measure_space_of_inner_product_space`, these put a `measure_space` structure
on `euclidean_space`. -/
namespace euclidean_space
variables (ι)
-- TODO: do we want these instances for `pi_Lp` too?
instance : measurable_space (euclidean_space ℝ ι) := measurable_space.pi
instance : borel_space (euclidean_space ℝ ι) := pi.borel_space
/-- `pi_Lp.equiv` as a `measurable_equiv`. -/
@[simps to_equiv]
protected def measurable_equiv : euclidean_space ℝ ι ≃ᵐ (ι → ℝ) :=
{ to_equiv := pi_Lp.equiv _ _,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id }
lemma coe_measurable_equiv : ⇑(euclidean_space.measurable_equiv ι) = pi_Lp.equiv 2 _ := rfl
end euclidean_space
|
10a5b953047ead9a7f74b204668c85e6df64165f | 8e6cad62ec62c6c348e5faaa3c3f2079012bdd69 | /src/data/nat/cast.lean | f8d5169e0e0c4e78c9ee4c75cca61dd856ba4a7d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | benjamindavidson/mathlib | 8cc81c865aa8e7cf4462245f58d35ae9a56b150d | fad44b9f670670d87c8e25ff9cdf63af87ad731e | refs/heads/master | 1,679,545,578,362 | 1,615,343,014,000 | 1,615,343,014,000 | 312,926,983 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,615,360,301,000 | 1,605,399,418,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,484 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Natural homomorphism from the natural numbers into a monoid with one.
-/
import algebra.ordered_field
import data.nat.basic
namespace nat
variables {α : Type*}
section
variables [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α]
/-- Canonical homomorphism from `ℕ` to a type `α` with `0`, `1` and `+`. -/
protected def cast : ℕ → α
| 0 := 0
| (n+1) := cast n + 1
/-- Computationally friendlier cast than `nat.cast`, using binary representation. -/
protected def bin_cast (n : ℕ) : α :=
@nat.binary_rec (λ _, α) 0 (λ odd k a, cond odd (a + a + 1) (a + a)) n
/--
Coercions such as `nat.cast_coe` that go from a concrete structure such as
`ℕ` to an arbitrary ring `α` should be set up as follows:
```lean
@[priority 900] instance : has_coe_t ℕ α := ⟨...⟩
```
It needs to be `has_coe_t` instead of `has_coe` because otherwise type-class
inference would loop when constructing the transitive coercion `ℕ → ℕ → ℕ → ...`.
The reduced priority is necessary so that it doesn't conflict with instances
such as `has_coe_t α (option α)`.
For this to work, we reduce the priority of the `coe_base` and `coe_trans`
instances because we want the instances for `has_coe_t` to be tried in the
following order:
1. `has_coe_t` instances declared in mathlib (such as `has_coe_t α (with_top α)`, etc.)
2. `coe_base`, which contains instances such as `has_coe (fin n) n`
3. `nat.cast_coe : has_coe_t ℕ α` etc.
4. `coe_trans`
If `coe_trans` is tried first, then `nat.cast_coe` doesn't get a chance to apply.
-/
library_note "coercion into rings"
attribute [instance, priority 950] coe_base
attribute [instance, priority 500] coe_trans
-- see note [coercion into rings]
@[priority 900] instance cast_coe : has_coe_t ℕ α := ⟨nat.cast⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : α) = 0 := rfl
theorem cast_add_one (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : α) = n + 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, priority 500]
theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((succ n : ℕ) : α) = n + 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_ite (P : Prop) [decidable P] (m n : ℕ) :
(((ite P m n) : ℕ) : α) = ite P (m : α) (n : α) :=
by { split_ifs; refl, }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_one [add_monoid α] [has_one α] : ((1 : ℕ) : α) = 1 := zero_add _
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_add [add_monoid α] [has_one α] (m) : ∀ n, ((m + n : ℕ) : α) = m + n
| 0 := (add_zero _).symm
| (n+1) := show ((m + n : ℕ) : α) + 1 = m + (n + 1), by rw [cast_add n, add_assoc]
@[simp] lemma bin_cast_eq [add_monoid α] [has_one α] (n : ℕ) :
(nat.bin_cast n : α) = ((n : ℕ) : α) :=
begin
rw nat.bin_cast,
apply binary_rec _ _ n,
{ rw [binary_rec_zero, cast_zero] },
{ intros b k h,
rw [binary_rec_eq, h],
{ cases b; simp [bit, bit0, bit1] },
{ simp } },
end
/-- `coe : ℕ → α` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
def cast_add_monoid_hom (α : Type*) [add_monoid α] [has_one α] : ℕ →+ α :=
{ to_fun := coe,
map_add' := cast_add,
map_zero' := cast_zero }
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_add_monoid_hom [add_monoid α] [has_one α] :
(cast_add_monoid_hom α : ℕ → α) = coe := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_bit0 [add_monoid α] [has_one α] (n : ℕ) :
((bit0 n : ℕ) : α) = bit0 n := cast_add _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_bit1 [add_monoid α] [has_one α] (n : ℕ) :
((bit1 n : ℕ) : α) = bit1 n :=
by rw [bit1, cast_add_one, cast_bit0]; refl
lemma cast_two {α : Type*} [add_monoid α] [has_one α] : ((2 : ℕ) : α) = 2 := by simp
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_pred [add_group α] [has_one α] :
∀ {n}, 0 < n → ((n - 1 : ℕ) : α) = n - 1
| (n+1) h := (add_sub_cancel (n:α) 1).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_sub [add_group α] [has_one α] {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
((n - m : ℕ) : α) = n - m :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by rw [← cast_add, nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_mul [semiring α] (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : ℕ) : α) = m * n
| 0 := (mul_zero _).symm
| (n+1) := (cast_add _ _).trans $
show ((m * n : ℕ) : α) + m = m * (n + 1), by rw [cast_mul n, left_distrib, mul_one]
@[simp] theorem cast_dvd {α : Type*} [field α] {m n : ℕ} (n_dvd : n ∣ m) (n_nonzero : (n:α) ≠ 0) :
((m / n : ℕ) : α) = m / n :=
begin
rcases n_dvd with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
have : n ≠ 0, {rintro rfl, simpa using n_nonzero},
rw nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this),
rw [nat.cast_mul, mul_div_cancel_left _ n_nonzero],
end
/-- `coe : ℕ → α` as a `ring_hom` -/
def cast_ring_hom (α : Type*) [semiring α] : ℕ →+* α :=
{ to_fun := coe,
map_one' := cast_one,
map_mul' := cast_mul,
.. cast_add_monoid_hom α }
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_ring_hom [semiring α] : (cast_ring_hom α : ℕ → α) = coe := rfl
lemma cast_commute [semiring α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) : commute ↑n x :=
nat.rec_on n (commute.zero_left x) $ λ n ihn, ihn.add_left $ commute.one_left x
lemma commute_cast [semiring α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) : commute x n :=
(n.cast_commute x).symm
section
variables [ordered_semiring α]
@[simp] theorem cast_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ (n : α)
| 0 := le_refl _
| (n+1) := add_nonneg (cast_nonneg n) zero_le_one
theorem mono_cast : monotone (coe : ℕ → α) :=
λ m n h, let ⟨k, hk⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.1 h in by simp [hk]
variable [nontrivial α]
theorem strict_mono_cast : strict_mono (coe : ℕ → α) :=
λ m n h, nat.le_induction (lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one)
(λ n _ h, lt_add_of_lt_of_pos h zero_lt_one) _ h
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_le {m n : ℕ} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
strict_mono_cast.le_iff_le
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_lt {m n : ℕ} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n :=
strict_mono_cast.lt_iff_lt
@[simp] theorem cast_pos {n : ℕ} : (0 : α) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
lemma cast_add_one_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n : α) + 1 :=
add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos n.cast_nonneg zero_lt_one
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem one_lt_cast {n : ℕ} : 1 < (n : α) ↔ 1 < n :=
by rw [← cast_one, cast_lt]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem one_le_cast {n : ℕ} : 1 ≤ (n : α) ↔ 1 ≤ n :=
by rw [← cast_one, cast_le]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_lt_one {n : ℕ} : (n : α) < 1 ↔ n = 0 :=
by rw [← cast_one, cast_lt, lt_succ_iff, le_zero_iff]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_le_one {n : ℕ} : (n : α) ≤ 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 :=
by rw [← cast_one, cast_le]
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_min [linear_ordered_semiring α] {a b : ℕ} :
(↑(min a b) : α) = min a b :=
by by_cases a ≤ b; simp [h, min]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_max [linear_ordered_semiring α] {a b : ℕ} :
(↑(max a b) : α) = max a b :=
by by_cases a ≤ b; simp [h, max]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem abs_cast [linear_ordered_ring α] (a : ℕ) :
abs (a : α) = a :=
abs_of_nonneg (cast_nonneg a)
lemma coe_nat_dvd [comm_semiring α] {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∣ n) :
(m : α) ∣ (n : α) :=
ring_hom.map_dvd (nat.cast_ring_hom α) h
alias coe_nat_dvd ← has_dvd.dvd.nat_cast
section linear_ordered_field
variables [linear_ordered_field α]
lemma inv_pos_of_nat {n : ℕ} : 0 < ((n : α) + 1)⁻¹ :=
inv_pos.2 $ add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos n.cast_nonneg zero_lt_one
lemma one_div_pos_of_nat {n : ℕ} : 0 < 1 / ((n : α) + 1) :=
by { rw one_div, exact inv_pos_of_nat }
lemma one_div_le_one_div {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : 1 / ((m : α) + 1) ≤ 1 / ((n : α) + 1) :=
by { refine one_div_le_one_div_of_le _ _, exact nat.cast_add_one_pos _, simpa }
lemma one_div_lt_one_div {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : 1 / ((m : α) + 1) < 1 / ((n : α) + 1) :=
by { refine one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt _ _, exact nat.cast_add_one_pos _, simpa }
end linear_ordered_field
end nat
namespace add_monoid_hom
variables {A B : Type*} [add_monoid A]
@[ext] lemma ext_nat {f g : ℕ →+ A} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
ext $ λ n, nat.rec_on n (f.map_zero.trans g.map_zero.symm) $ λ n ihn,
by simp only [nat.succ_eq_add_one, *, map_add]
variables [has_one A] [add_monoid B] [has_one B]
lemma eq_nat_cast (f : ℕ →+ A) (h1 : f 1 = 1) :
∀ n : ℕ, f n = n :=
congr_fun $ show f = nat.cast_add_monoid_hom A, from ext_nat (h1.trans nat.cast_one.symm)
lemma map_nat_cast (f : A →+ B) (h1 : f 1 = 1) (n : ℕ) : f n = n :=
(f.comp (nat.cast_add_monoid_hom A)).eq_nat_cast (by simp [h1]) _
end add_monoid_hom
namespace ring_hom
variables {R : Type*} {S : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S]
@[simp] lemma eq_nat_cast (f : ℕ →+* R) (n : ℕ) : f n = n :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.eq_nat_cast f.map_one n
@[simp] lemma map_nat_cast (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) :
f n = n :=
(f.comp (nat.cast_ring_hom R)).eq_nat_cast n
lemma ext_nat (f g : ℕ →+* R) : f = g :=
coe_add_monoid_hom_injective $ add_monoid_hom.ext_nat $ f.map_one.trans g.map_one.symm
end ring_hom
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat.cast_id (n : ℕ) : ↑n = n :=
((ring_hom.id ℕ).eq_nat_cast n).symm
@[simp] theorem nat.cast_with_bot : ∀ (n : ℕ),
@coe ℕ (with_bot ℕ) (@coe_to_lift _ _ nat.cast_coe) n = n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [with_bot.coe_add, nat.cast_add, nat.cast_with_bot n]; refl
instance nat.subsingleton_ring_hom {R : Type*} [semiring R] : subsingleton (ℕ →+* R) :=
⟨ring_hom.ext_nat⟩
namespace with_top
variables {α : Type*}
variables [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat : ∀(n : nat), ((n : α) : with_top α) = n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by { push_cast, rw [coe_nat n] }
@[simp] lemma nat_ne_top (n : nat) : (n : with_top α) ≠ ⊤ :=
by { rw [←coe_nat n], apply coe_ne_top }
@[simp] lemma top_ne_nat (n : nat) : (⊤ : with_top α) ≠ n :=
by { rw [←coe_nat n], apply top_ne_coe }
lemma add_one_le_of_lt {i n : with_top ℕ} (h : i < n) : i + 1 ≤ n :=
begin
cases n, { exact le_top },
cases i, { exact (not_le_of_lt h le_top).elim },
exact with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (with_top.coe_lt_coe.1 h)
end
lemma one_le_iff_pos {n : with_top ℕ} : 1 ≤ n ↔ 0 < n :=
⟨λ h, (coe_lt_coe.2 zero_lt_one).trans_le h,
λ h, by simpa only [zero_add] using add_one_le_of_lt h⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma nat_induction {P : with_top ℕ → Prop} (a : with_top ℕ)
(h0 : P 0) (hsuc : ∀n:ℕ, P n → P n.succ) (htop : (∀n : ℕ, P n) → P ⊤) : P a :=
begin
have A : ∀n:ℕ, P n := λ n, nat.rec_on n h0 hsuc,
cases a,
{ exact htop A },
{ exact A a }
end
end with_top
|
bd0ca08591a77675bc97afcd532368b72e390b15 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/probability/process/hitting_time.lean | 2e46740b5d738d62551f967bea33775c4990118e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,098 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import probability.process.stopping
/-!
# Hitting time
Given a stochastic process, the hitting time provides the first time the process ``hits'' some
subset of the state space. The hitting time is a stopping time in the case that the time index is
discrete and the process is adapted (this is true in a far more general setting however we have
only proved it for the discrete case so far).
## Main definition
* `measure_theory.hitting`: the hitting time of a stochastic process
## Main results
* `measure_theory.hitting_is_stopping_time`: a discrete hitting time of an adapted process is a
stopping time
## Implementation notes
In the definition of the hitting time, we bound the hitting time by an upper and lower bound.
This is to ensure that our result is meaningful in the case we are taking the infimum of an
empty set or the infimum of a set which is unbounded from below. With this, we can talk about
hitting times indexed by the natural numbers or the reals. By taking the bounds to be
`⊤` and `⊥`, we obtain the standard definition in the case that the index is `ℕ∞` or `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
open filter order topological_space
open_locale classical measure_theory nnreal ennreal topological_space big_operators
namespace measure_theory
variables {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : measurable_space Ω}
/-- Hitting time: given a stochastic process `u` and a set `s`, `hitting u s n m` is the first time
`u` is in `s` after time `n` and before time `m` (if `u` does not hit `s` after time `n` and
before `m` then the hitting time is simply `m`).
The hitting time is a stopping time if the process is adapted and discrete. -/
noncomputable def hitting [preorder ι] [has_Inf ι] (u : ι → Ω → β) (s : set β) (n m : ι) : Ω → ι :=
λ x, if ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j x ∈ s then Inf (set.Icc n m ∩ {i : ι | u i x ∈ s}) else m
section inequalities
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order ι] {u : ι → Ω → β} {s : set β} {n i : ι} {ω : Ω}
/-- This lemma is strictly weaker than `hitting_of_le`. -/
lemma hitting_of_lt {m : ι} (h : m < n) : hitting u s n m ω = m :=
begin
simp_rw [hitting],
have h_not : ¬ ∃ (j : ι) (H : j ∈ set.Icc n m), u j ω ∈ s,
{ push_neg,
intro j,
rw set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt h,
simp only [set.mem_empty_iff_false, is_empty.forall_iff], },
simp only [h_not, if_false],
end
lemma hitting_le {m : ι} (ω : Ω) : hitting u s n m ω ≤ m :=
begin
cases le_or_lt n m with h_le h_lt,
{ simp only [hitting],
split_ifs,
{ obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h,
exact (cInf_le (bdd_below.inter_of_left bdd_below_Icc) (set.mem_inter hj₁ hj₂)).trans hj₁.2 },
{ exact le_rfl }, },
{ rw hitting_of_lt h_lt, },
end
lemma not_mem_of_lt_hitting {m k : ι}
(hk₁ : k < hitting u s n m ω) (hk₂ : n ≤ k) :
u k ω ∉ s :=
begin
classical,
intro h,
have hexists : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s,
refine ⟨k, ⟨hk₂, le_trans hk₁.le $ hitting_le _⟩, h⟩,
refine not_le.2 hk₁ _,
simp_rw [hitting, if_pos hexists],
exact cInf_le bdd_below_Icc.inter_of_left ⟨⟨hk₂, le_trans hk₁.le $ hitting_le _⟩, h⟩,
end
lemma hitting_eq_end_iff {m : ι} :
hitting u s n m ω = m ↔ (∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s) →
Inf (set.Icc n m ∩ {i : ι | u i ω ∈ s}) = m :=
by rw [hitting, ite_eq_right_iff]
lemma hitting_of_le {m : ι} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
hitting u s n m ω = m :=
begin
obtain (rfl | h) := le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hmn,
{ simp only [hitting, set.Icc_self, ite_eq_right_iff, set.mem_Icc, exists_prop,
forall_exists_index, and_imp],
intros i hi₁ hi₂ hi,
rw [set.inter_eq_left_iff_subset.2, cInf_singleton],
exact set.singleton_subset_iff.2 (le_antisymm hi₂ hi₁ ▸ hi) },
{ exact hitting_of_lt h }
end
lemma le_hitting {m : ι} (hnm : n ≤ m) (ω : Ω) : n ≤ hitting u s n m ω :=
begin
simp only [hitting],
split_ifs,
{ refine le_cInf _ (λ b hb, _),
{ obtain ⟨k, hk_Icc, hk_s⟩ := h,
exact ⟨k, hk_Icc, hk_s⟩, },
{ rw set.mem_inter_iff at hb,
exact hb.1.1, }, },
{ exact hnm },
end
lemma le_hitting_of_exists {m : ι} (h_exists : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s) :
n ≤ hitting u s n m ω :=
begin
refine le_hitting _ ω,
by_contra,
rw set.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (not_le.mp h) at h_exists,
simpa using h_exists,
end
lemma hitting_mem_Icc {m : ι} (hnm : n ≤ m) (ω : Ω) : hitting u s n m ω ∈ set.Icc n m :=
⟨le_hitting hnm ω, hitting_le ω⟩
lemma hitting_mem_set [is_well_order ι (<)] {m : ι} (h_exists : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s) :
u (hitting u s n m ω) ω ∈ s :=
begin
simp_rw [hitting, if_pos h_exists],
have h_nonempty : (set.Icc n m ∩ {i : ι | u i ω ∈ s}).nonempty,
{ obtain ⟨k, hk₁, hk₂⟩ := h_exists,
exact ⟨k, set.mem_inter hk₁ hk₂⟩, },
have h_mem := Inf_mem h_nonempty,
rw [set.mem_inter_iff] at h_mem,
exact h_mem.2,
end
lemma hitting_mem_set_of_hitting_lt [is_well_order ι (<)] {m : ι}
(hl : hitting u s n m ω < m) :
u (hitting u s n m ω) ω ∈ s :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s,
{ exact hitting_mem_set h },
{ simp_rw [hitting, if_neg h] at hl,
exact false.elim (hl.ne rfl) }
end
lemma hitting_le_of_mem {m : ι} (hin : n ≤ i) (him : i ≤ m) (his : u i ω ∈ s) :
hitting u s n m ω ≤ i :=
begin
have h_exists : ∃ k ∈ set.Icc n m, u k ω ∈ s := ⟨i, ⟨hin, him⟩, his⟩,
simp_rw [hitting, if_pos h_exists],
exact cInf_le (bdd_below.inter_of_left bdd_below_Icc) (set.mem_inter ⟨hin, him⟩ his),
end
lemma hitting_le_iff_of_exists [is_well_order ι (<)] {m : ι}
(h_exists : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s) :
hitting u s n m ω ≤ i ↔ ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n i, u j ω ∈ s :=
begin
split; intro h',
{ exact ⟨hitting u s n m ω, ⟨le_hitting_of_exists h_exists, h'⟩, hitting_mem_set h_exists⟩, },
{ have h'' : ∃ k ∈ set.Icc n (min m i), u k ω ∈ s,
{ obtain ⟨k₁, hk₁_mem, hk₁_s⟩ := h_exists,
obtain ⟨k₂, hk₂_mem, hk₂_s⟩ := h',
refine ⟨min k₁ k₂, ⟨le_min hk₁_mem.1 hk₂_mem.1, min_le_min hk₁_mem.2 hk₂_mem.2⟩, _⟩,
exact min_rec' (λ j, u j ω ∈ s) hk₁_s hk₂_s, },
obtain ⟨k, hk₁, hk₂⟩ := h'',
refine le_trans _ (hk₁.2.trans (min_le_right _ _)),
exact hitting_le_of_mem hk₁.1 (hk₁.2.trans (min_le_left _ _)) hk₂, },
end
lemma hitting_le_iff_of_lt [is_well_order ι (<)] {m : ι} (i : ι) (hi : i < m) :
hitting u s n m ω ≤ i ↔ ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n i, u j ω ∈ s :=
begin
by_cases h_exists : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s,
{ rw hitting_le_iff_of_exists h_exists, },
{ simp_rw [hitting, if_neg h_exists],
push_neg at h_exists,
simp only [not_le.mpr hi, set.mem_Icc, false_iff, not_exists, and_imp],
exact λ k hkn hki, h_exists k ⟨hkn, hki.trans hi.le⟩, },
end
lemma hitting_lt_iff [is_well_order ι (<)] {m : ι} (i : ι) (hi : i ≤ m) :
hitting u s n m ω < i ↔ ∃ j ∈ set.Ico n i, u j ω ∈ s :=
begin
split; intro h',
{ have h : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s,
{ by_contra,
simp_rw [hitting, if_neg h, ← not_le] at h',
exact h' hi, },
exact ⟨hitting u s n m ω, ⟨le_hitting_of_exists h, h'⟩, hitting_mem_set h⟩, },
{ obtain ⟨k, hk₁, hk₂⟩ := h',
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ hk₁.2,
exact hitting_le_of_mem hk₁.1 (hk₁.2.le.trans hi) hk₂, },
end
lemma hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists
{m₁ m₂ : ι} (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) (h' : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m₁, u j ω ∈ s) :
hitting u s n m₁ ω = hitting u s n m₂ ω :=
begin
simp only [hitting, if_pos h'],
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h',
rw if_pos,
{ refine le_antisymm _ (cInf_le_cInf bdd_below_Icc.inter_of_left ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩
(set.inter_subset_inter_left _ (set.Icc_subset_Icc_right h))),
refine le_cInf ⟨j, set.Icc_subset_Icc_right h hj₁, hj₂⟩ (λ i hi, _),
by_cases hi' : i ≤ m₁,
{ exact cInf_le bdd_below_Icc.inter_of_left ⟨⟨hi.1.1, hi'⟩, hi.2⟩ },
{ exact ((cInf_le bdd_below_Icc.inter_of_left ⟨hj₁, hj₂⟩).trans (hj₁.2.trans le_rfl)).trans
(le_of_lt (not_le.1 hi')) } },
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.trans h⟩, hj₂⟩,
end
lemma hitting_mono {m₁ m₂ : ι} (hm : m₁ ≤ m₂) :
hitting u s n m₁ ω ≤ hitting u s n m₂ ω :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m₁, u j ω ∈ s,
{ exact (hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hm h).le },
{ simp_rw [hitting, if_neg h],
split_ifs with h',
{ obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h',
refine le_cInf ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ _,
by_contra hneg, push_neg at hneg,
obtain ⟨i, hi₁, hi₂⟩ := hneg,
exact h ⟨i, ⟨hi₁.1.1, hi₂.le⟩, hi₁.2⟩ },
{ exact hm } }
end
end inequalities
/-- A discrete hitting time is a stopping time. -/
lemma hitting_is_stopping_time
[conditionally_complete_linear_order ι] [is_well_order ι (<)] [countable ι]
[topological_space β] [pseudo_metrizable_space β] [measurable_space β] [borel_space β]
{f : filtration ι m} {u : ι → Ω → β} {s : set β} {n n' : ι}
(hu : adapted f u) (hs : measurable_set s) :
is_stopping_time f (hitting u s n n') :=
begin
intro i,
cases le_or_lt n' i with hi hi,
{ have h_le : ∀ ω, hitting u s n n' ω ≤ i := λ x, (hitting_le x).trans hi,
simp [h_le], },
{ have h_set_eq_Union : {ω | hitting u s n n' ω ≤ i} = ⋃ j ∈ set.Icc n i, u j ⁻¹' s,
{ ext x,
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ hi],
simp only [set.mem_Icc, exists_prop, set.mem_Union, set.mem_preimage], },
rw h_set_eq_Union,
exact measurable_set.Union (λ j, measurable_set.Union $
λ hj, f.mono hj.2 _ ((hu j).measurable hs)) }
end
lemma stopped_value_hitting_mem [conditionally_complete_linear_order ι] [is_well_order ι (<)]
{u : ι → Ω → β} {s : set β} {n m : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : ∃ j ∈ set.Icc n m, u j ω ∈ s) :
stopped_value u (hitting u s n m) ω ∈ s :=
begin
simp only [stopped_value, hitting, if_pos h],
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h,
have : Inf (set.Icc n m ∩ {i | u i ω ∈ s}) ∈ set.Icc n m ∩ {i | u i ω ∈ s} :=
Inf_mem (set.nonempty_of_mem ⟨hj₁, hj₂⟩),
exact this.2,
end
/-- The hitting time of a discrete process with the starting time indexed by a stopping time
is a stopping time. -/
lemma is_stopping_time_hitting_is_stopping_time
[conditionally_complete_linear_order ι] [is_well_order ι (<)] [countable ι]
[topological_space ι] [order_topology ι] [first_countable_topology ι]
[topological_space β] [pseudo_metrizable_space β] [measurable_space β] [borel_space β]
{f : filtration ι m} {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : is_stopping_time f τ)
{N : ι} (hτbdd : ∀ x, τ x ≤ N) {s : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) (hf : adapted f u) :
is_stopping_time f (λ x, hitting u s (τ x) N x) :=
begin
intro n,
have h₁ : {x | hitting u s (τ x) N x ≤ n} =
(⋃ i ≤ n, {x | τ x = i} ∩ {x | hitting u s i N x ≤ n}) ∪
(⋃ i > n, {x | τ x = i} ∩ {x | hitting u s i N x ≤ n}),
{ ext x,
simp [← exists_or_distrib, ← or_and_distrib_right, le_or_lt] },
have h₂ : (⋃ i > n, {x | τ x = i} ∩ {x | hitting u s i N x ≤ n}) = ∅,
{ ext x,
simp only [gt_iff_lt, set.mem_Union, set.mem_inter_iff, set.mem_set_of_eq,
exists_prop, set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_exists, not_and, not_le],
rintro m hm rfl,
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hm (le_hitting (hτbdd _) _) },
rw [h₁, h₂, set.union_empty],
exact measurable_set.Union (λ i, measurable_set.Union
(λ hi, (f.mono hi _ (hτ.measurable_set_eq i)).inter (hitting_is_stopping_time hf hs n))),
end
section complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice ι] {u : ι → Ω → β} {s : set β} {f : filtration ι m}
lemma hitting_eq_Inf (ω : Ω) : hitting u s ⊥ ⊤ ω = Inf {i : ι | u i ω ∈ s} :=
begin
simp only [hitting, set.mem_Icc, bot_le, le_top, and_self, exists_true_left, set.Icc_bot,
set.Iic_top, set.univ_inter, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists],
intro h_nmem_s,
symmetry,
rw Inf_eq_top,
exact λ i hi_mem_s, absurd hi_mem_s (h_nmem_s i),
end
end complete_lattice
section conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot ι] [is_well_order ι (<)]
variables {u : ι → Ω → β} {s : set β} {f : filtration ℕ m}
lemma hitting_bot_le_iff {i n : ι} {ω : Ω} (hx : ∃ j, j ≤ n ∧ u j ω ∈ s) :
hitting u s ⊥ n ω ≤ i ↔ ∃ j ≤ i, u j ω ∈ s :=
begin
cases lt_or_le i n with hi hi,
{ rw hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ hi,
simp, },
{ simp only [(hitting_le ω).trans hi, true_iff],
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := hx,
exact ⟨j, hj₁.trans hi, hj₂⟩, },
end
end conditionally_complete_linear_order_bot
end measure_theory
|
c669eedf1c2c3d1f094cecc44192d64667f4ebce | 3dd1b66af77106badae6edb1c4dea91a146ead30 | /tests/lean/run/t6.lean | 706080e0956757c1de494504767d06b968b07a34 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | silky/lean | 79c20c15c93feef47bb659a2cc139b26f3614642 | df8b88dca2f8da1a422cb618cd476ef5be730546 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,737,587,697 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 22,362,176 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 361 | lean | precedence `+` : 65
precedence `++` : 100
variable N : Type.{1}
variable f : N → N → N
variable a : N
check
let g x y := f x y,
infix + := g,
b : N := a+a,
c := b+a,
h (x : N) := x+x,
postfix ++ := h,
d := c++,
r (x : N) : N := x++++
in f b (r c)
|
d5dda079e7128644915dd9863d19aa15ee588708 | a7eef317ddec01b9fc6cfbb876fe7ac00f205ac7 | /src/tactic/core.lean | 967dc9aa77d5b787d678f2e5f669dc5e642b3151 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kmill/mathlib | ea5a007b67ae4e9e18dd50d31d8aa60f650425ee | 1a419a9fea7b959317eddd556e1bb9639f4dcc05 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,578,197,719 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 276,482,939 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,593,637,960,000 | 1,593,637,959,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 84,685 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison, Keeley Hoek
-/
import data.dlist.basic
import control.basic
import meta.expr
import meta.rb_map
import data.bool
import tactic.lean_core_docs
import tactic.interactive_expr
universe variable u
instance : has_lt pos :=
{ lt := λ x y, (x.line, x.column) < (y.line, y.column) }
namespace expr
open tactic
/-- Given an expr `α` representing a type with numeral structure,
`of_nat α n` creates the `α`-valued numeral expression corresponding to `n`. -/
protected meta def of_nat (α : expr) : ℕ → tactic expr :=
nat.binary_rec
(tactic.mk_mapp ``has_zero.zero [some α, none])
(λ b n tac, if n = 0 then mk_mapp ``has_one.one [some α, none] else
do e ← tac, tactic.mk_app (cond b ``bit1 ``bit0) [e])
/-- Given an expr `α` representing a type with numeral structure,
`of_int α n` creates the `α`-valued numeral expression corresponding to `n`.
The output is either a numeral or the negation of a numeral. -/
protected meta def of_int (α : expr) : ℤ → tactic expr
| (n : ℕ) := expr.of_nat α n
| -[1+ n] := do
e ← expr.of_nat α (n+1),
tactic.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [e]
/-- Generates an expression of the form `∃(args), inner`. `args` is assumed to be a list of local
constants. When possible, `p ∧ q` is used instead of `∃(_ : p), q`. -/
meta def mk_exists_lst (args : list expr) (inner : expr) : tactic expr :=
args.mfoldr (λarg i:expr, do
t ← infer_type arg,
sort l ← infer_type t,
return $ if arg.occurs i ∨ l ≠ level.zero
then (const `Exists [l] : expr) t (i.lambdas [arg])
else (const `and [] : expr) t i)
inner
/-- `traverse f e` applies the monadic function `f` to the direct descendants of `e`. -/
meta def traverse {m : Type → Type u} [applicative m]
{elab elab' : bool} (f : expr elab → m (expr elab')) :
expr elab → m (expr elab')
| (var v) := pure $ var v
| (sort l) := pure $ sort l
| (const n ls) := pure $ const n ls
| (mvar n n' e) := mvar n n' <$> f e
| (local_const n n' bi e) := local_const n n' bi <$> f e
| (app e₀ e₁) := app <$> f e₀ <*> f e₁
| (lam n bi e₀ e₁) := lam n bi <$> f e₀ <*> f e₁
| (pi n bi e₀ e₁) := pi n bi <$> f e₀ <*> f e₁
| (elet n e₀ e₁ e₂) := elet n <$> f e₀ <*> f e₁ <*> f e₂
| (macro mac es) := macro mac <$> list.traverse f es
/-- `mfoldl f a e` folds the monadic function `f` over the subterms of the expression `e`,
with initial value `a`. -/
meta def mfoldl {α : Type} {m} [monad m] (f : α → expr → m α) : α → expr → m α
| x e := prod.snd <$> (state_t.run (e.traverse $ λ e',
(get >>= monad_lift ∘ flip f e' >>= put) $> e') x : m _)
/-- `kreplace e old new` replaces all occurrences of the expression `old` in `e`
with `new`. The occurrences of `old` in `e` are determined using keyed matching
with transparency `md`; see `kabstract` for details. If `unify` is true,
we may assign metavariables in `e` as we match subterms of `e` against `old`. -/
meta def kreplace (e old new : expr) (md := semireducible) (unify := tt)
: tactic expr := do
e ← kabstract e old md unify,
pure $ e.instantiate_var new
end expr
namespace interaction_monad
open result
variables {σ : Type} {α : Type u}
/-- `get_state` returns the underlying state inside an interaction monad, from within that monad. -/
-- Note that this is a generalization of `tactic.read` in core.
meta def get_state : interaction_monad σ σ :=
λ state, success state state
/-- `set_state` sets the underlying state inside an interaction monad, from within that monad. -/
-- Note that this is a generalization of `tactic.write` in core.
meta def set_state (state : σ) : interaction_monad σ unit :=
λ _, success () state
/--
`run_with_state state tac` applies `tac` to the given state `state` and returns the result,
subsequently restoring the original state.
If `tac` fails, then `run_with_state` does too.
-/
meta def run_with_state (state : σ) (tac : interaction_monad σ α) : interaction_monad σ α :=
λ s, match tac state with
| success val _ := success val s
| exception fn pos _ := exception fn pos s
end
end interaction_monad
namespace format
/-- `join' [a,b,c]` produces the format object `abc`.
It differs from `format.join` by using `format.nil` instead of `""` for the empty list. -/
meta def join' (xs : list format) : format :=
xs.foldl compose nil
/-- `intercalate x [a, b, c]` produces the format object `a.x.b.x.c`,
where `.` represents `format.join`. -/
meta def intercalate (x : format) : list format → format :=
join' ∘ list.intersperse x
/-- `soft_break` is similar to `line`. Whereas in `group (x ++ line ++ y ++ line ++ z)`
the result either fits on one line or in three, `x ++ soft_break ++ y ++ soft_break ++ z`
each line break is decided independently -/
meta def soft_break : format :=
group line
end format
section format
open format
/-- format a `list` by separating elements with `soft_break` instead of `line` -/
meta def list.to_line_wrap_format {α : Type u} [has_to_format α] : list α → format
| [] := to_fmt "[]"
| xs := to_fmt "[" ++ group (nest 1 $ intercalate ("," ++ soft_break) $ xs.map to_fmt) ++ to_fmt "]"
end format
namespace tactic
open function
/-- Private work function for `add_local_consts_as_local_hyps`: given
`mappings : list (expr × expr)` corresponding to pairs `(var, hyp)` of variables and the local
hypothesis created as a result and `(var :: rest) : list expr` of more local variables we
examine `var` to see if it contains any other variables in `rest`. If it does, we put it to the
back of the queue and recurse. If it does not, then we perform replacements inside the type of
`var` using the `mappings`, create a new associate local hypothesis, add this to the list of
mappings, and recurse. We are done once all local hypotheses have been processed.
If the list of passed local constants have types which depend on one another (which can only
happen by hand-crafting the `expr`s manually), this function will loop forever. -/
private meta def add_local_consts_as_local_hyps_aux
: list (expr × expr) → list expr → tactic (list (expr × expr))
| mappings [] := return mappings
| mappings (var :: rest) := do
/- Determine if `var` contains any local variables in the lift `rest`. -/
let is_dependent := var.local_type.fold ff $ λ e n b,
if b then b else e ∈ rest,
/- If so, then skip it---add it to the end of the variable queue. -/
if is_dependent then
add_local_consts_as_local_hyps_aux mappings (rest ++ [var])
else do
/- Otherwise, replace all of the local constants referenced by the type of `var` with the
respective new corresponding local hypotheses as recorded in the list `mappings`. -/
let new_type := var.local_type.replace_subexprs mappings,
/- Introduce a new local new local hypothesis `hyp` for `var`, with the correct type. -/
hyp ← assertv var.local_pp_name new_type (var.local_const_set_type new_type),
/- Process the next variable in the queue, with the mapping list updated to include the local
hypothesis which we just created. -/
add_local_consts_as_local_hyps_aux ((var, hyp) :: mappings) rest
/-- `add_local_consts_as_local_hyps vars` add the given list `vars` of `expr.local_const`s to the
tactic state. This is harder than it sounds, since the list of local constants which we have
been passed can have dependencies between their types.
For example, suppose we have two local constants `n : ℕ` and `h : n = 3`. Then we cannot blindly
add `h` as a local hypothesis, since we need the `n` to which it refers to be the `n` created as
a new local hypothesis, not the old local constant `n` with the same name. Of course, these
dependencies can be nested arbitrarily deep.
If the list of passed local constants have types which depend on one another (which can only
happen by hand-crafting the `expr`s manually), this function will loop forever. -/
meta def add_local_consts_as_local_hyps (vars : list expr) : tactic (list (expr × expr)) :=
/- The `list.reverse` below is a performance optimisation since the list of available variables
reported by the system is often mostly the reverse of the order in which they are dependent. -/
add_local_consts_as_local_hyps_aux [] vars.reverse.erase_dup
/-- `mk_local_pisn e n` instantiates the first `n` variables of a pi expression `e`,
and returns the new local constants along with the instantiated expression. Fails if `e` does
not begin with at least `n` pi binders. -/
meta def mk_local_pisn : expr → nat → tactic (list expr × expr)
| (expr.pi n bi d b) (c + 1) := do
p ← mk_local' n bi d,
(ps, r) ← mk_local_pisn (b.instantiate_var p) c,
return ((p :: ps), r)
| e 0 := return ([], e)
| _ _ := failed
-- TODO: move to `declaration` namespace in `meta/expr.lean`
/-- `mk_theorem n ls t e` creates a theorem declaration with name `n`, universe parameters named
`ls`, type `t`, and body `e`. -/
meta def mk_theorem (n : name) (ls : list name) (t : expr) (e : expr) : declaration :=
declaration.thm n ls t (task.pure e)
/-- `add_theorem_by n ls type tac` uses `tac` to synthesize a term with type `type`, and adds this
to the environment as a theorem with name `n` and universe parameters `ls`. -/
meta def add_theorem_by (n : name) (ls : list name) (type : expr) (tac : tactic unit) :
tactic expr :=
do ((), body) ← solve_aux type tac,
body ← instantiate_mvars body,
add_decl $ mk_theorem n ls type body,
return $ expr.const n $ ls.map level.param
/-- `eval_expr' α e` attempts to evaluate the expression `e` in the type `α`.
This is a variant of `eval_expr` in core. Due to unexplained behavior in the VM, in rare
situations the latter will fail but the former will succeed. -/
meta def eval_expr' (α : Type*) [_inst_1 : reflected α] (e : expr) : tactic α :=
mk_app ``id [e] >>= eval_expr α
/-- `mk_fresh_name` returns identifiers starting with underscores,
which are not legal when emitted by tactic programs. `mk_user_fresh_name`
turns the useful source of random names provided by `mk_fresh_name` into
names which are usable by tactic programs.
The returned name has four components which are all strings. -/
meta def mk_user_fresh_name : tactic name :=
do nm ← mk_fresh_name,
return $ `user__ ++ nm.pop_prefix.sanitize_name ++ `user__
/-- `has_attribute' attr_name decl_name` checks
whether `decl_name` exists and has attribute `attr_name`. -/
meta def has_attribute' (attr_name decl_name : name) : tactic bool :=
succeeds (has_attribute attr_name decl_name)
/-- Checks whether the name is a simp lemma -/
meta def is_simp_lemma : name → tactic bool :=
has_attribute' `simp
/-- Checks whether the name is an instance. -/
meta def is_instance : name → tactic bool :=
has_attribute' `instance
/-- `local_decls` returns a dictionary mapping names to their corresponding declarations.
Covers all declarations from the current file. -/
meta def local_decls : tactic (name_map declaration) :=
do e ← tactic.get_env,
let xs := e.fold native.mk_rb_map
(λ d s, if environment.in_current_file' e d.to_name
then s.insert d.to_name d else s),
pure xs
/-- If `{nm}_{n}` doesn't exist in the environment, returns that, otherwise tries `{nm}_{n+1}` -/
meta def get_unused_decl_name_aux (e : environment) (nm : name) : ℕ → tactic name | n :=
let nm' := nm.append_suffix ("_" ++ to_string n) in
if e.contains nm' then get_unused_decl_name_aux (n+1) else return nm'
/-- Return a name which doesn't already exist in the environment. If `nm` doesn't exist, it
returns that, otherwise it tries `nm_2`, `nm_3`, ... -/
meta def get_unused_decl_name (nm : name) : tactic name :=
get_env >>= λ e, if e.contains nm then get_unused_decl_name_aux e nm 2 else return nm
/--
Returns a pair `(e, t)`, where `e ← mk_const d.to_name`, and `t = d.type`
but with universe params updated to match the fresh universe metavariables in `e`.
This should have the same effect as just
```lean
do e ← mk_const d.to_name,
t ← infer_type e,
return (e, t)
```
but is hopefully faster.
-/
meta def decl_mk_const (d : declaration) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do subst ← d.univ_params.mmap $ λ u, prod.mk u <$> mk_meta_univ,
let e : expr := expr.const d.to_name (prod.snd <$> subst),
return (e, d.type.instantiate_univ_params subst)
/--
Replace every universe metavariable in an expression with a universe parameter.
(This is useful when making new declarations.)
-/
meta def replace_univ_metas_with_univ_params (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
do
e.list_univ_meta_vars.enum.mmap (λ n, do
let n' := (`u).append_suffix ("_" ++ to_string (n.1+1)),
unify (expr.sort (level.mvar n.2)) (expr.sort (level.param n'))),
instantiate_mvars e
/-- `mk_local n` creates a dummy local variable with name `n`.
The type of this local constant is a constant with name `n`, so it is very unlikely to be
a meaningful expression. -/
meta def mk_local (n : name) : expr :=
expr.local_const n n binder_info.default (expr.const n [])
/-- `pis loc_consts f` is used to create a pi expression whose body is `f`.
`loc_consts` should be a list of local constants. The function will abstract these local
constants from `f` and bind them with pi binders.
For example, if `a, b` are local constants with types `Ta, Tb`,
``pis [a, b] `(f a b)`` will return the expression
`Π (a : Ta) (b : Tb), f a b`. -/
meta def pis : list expr → expr → tactic expr
| (e@(expr.local_const uniq pp info _) :: es) f := do
t ← infer_type e,
f' ← pis es f,
pure $ expr.pi pp info t (expr.abstract_local f' uniq)
| _ f := pure f
/-- `lambdas loc_consts f` is used to create a lambda expression whose body is `f`.
`loc_consts` should be a list of local constants. The function will abstract these local
constants from `f` and bind them with lambda binders.
For example, if `a, b` are local constants with types `Ta, Tb`,
``lambdas [a, b] `(f a b)`` will return the expression
`λ (a : Ta) (b : Tb), f a b`. -/
meta def lambdas : list expr → expr → tactic expr
| (e@(expr.local_const uniq pp info _) :: es) f := do
t ← infer_type e,
f' ← lambdas es f,
pure $ expr.lam pp info t (expr.abstract_local f' uniq)
| _ f := pure f
/-- `mk_psigma [x,y,z]`, with `[x,y,z]` list of local constants of types `x : tx`,
`y : ty x` and `z : tz x y`, creates an expression of sigma type:
`⟨x,y,z⟩ : Σ' (x : tx) (y : ty x), tz x y`.
-/
meta def mk_psigma : list expr → tactic expr
| [] := mk_const ``punit
| [x@(expr.local_const _ _ _ _)] := pure x
| (x@(expr.local_const _ _ _ _) :: xs) :=
do y ← mk_psigma xs,
α ← infer_type x,
β ← infer_type y,
t ← lambdas [x] β >>= instantiate_mvars,
r ← mk_mapp ``psigma.mk [α,t],
pure $ r x y
| _ := fail "mk_psigma expects a list of local constants"
/-- `elim_gen_prod n e _ ns` with `e` an expression of type `psigma _`, applies `cases` on `e` `n`
times and uses `ns` to name the resulting variables. Returns a triple: list of new variables,
remaining term and unused variable names.
-/
meta def elim_gen_prod : nat → expr → list expr → list name → tactic (list expr × expr × list name)
| 0 e hs ns := return (hs.reverse, e, ns)
| (n + 1) e hs ns := do
t ← infer_type e,
if t.is_app_of `eq then return (hs.reverse, e, ns)
else do
[(_, [h, h'], _)] ← cases_core e (ns.take 1),
elim_gen_prod n h' (h :: hs) (ns.drop 1)
private meta def elim_gen_sum_aux : nat → expr → list expr → tactic (list expr × expr)
| 0 e hs := return (hs, e)
| (n + 1) e hs := do
[(_, [h], _), (_, [h'], _)] ← induction e [],
swap,
elim_gen_sum_aux n h' (h::hs)
/-- `elim_gen_sum n e` applies cases on `e` `n` times. `e` is assumed to be a local constant whose
type is a (nested) sum `⊕`. Returns the list of local constants representing the components of `e`.
-/
meta def elim_gen_sum (n : nat) (e : expr) : tactic (list expr) := do
(hs, h') ← elim_gen_sum_aux n e [],
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals $ (gs.take (n+1)).reverse ++ gs.drop (n+1),
return $ hs.reverse ++ [h']
/-- Given `elab_def`, a tactic to solve the current goal,
`extract_def n trusted elab_def` will create an auxiliary definition named `n` and use it
to close the goal. If `trusted` is false, it will be a meta definition. -/
meta def extract_def (n : name) (trusted : bool) (elab_def : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do cxt ← list.map expr.to_implicit_local_const <$> local_context,
t ← target,
(eqns,d) ← solve_aux t elab_def,
d ← instantiate_mvars d,
t' ← pis cxt t,
d' ← lambdas cxt d,
let univ := t'.collect_univ_params,
add_decl $ declaration.defn n univ t' d' (reducibility_hints.regular 1 tt) trusted,
applyc n
/-- Attempts to close the goal with `dec_trivial`. -/
meta def exact_dec_trivial : tactic unit := `[exact dec_trivial]
/-- Runs a tactic for a result, reverting the state after completion. -/
meta def retrieve {α} (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
λ s, result.cases_on (tac s)
(λ a s', result.success a s)
result.exception
/-- Repeat a tactic at least once, calling it recursively on all subgoals,
until it fails. This tactic fails if the first invocation fails. -/
meta def repeat1 (t : tactic unit) : tactic unit := t; repeat t
/-- `iterate_range m n t`: Repeat the given tactic at least `m` times and
at most `n` times or until `t` fails. Fails if `t` does not run at least `m` times. -/
meta def iterate_range : ℕ → ℕ → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 0 t := skip
| 0 (n+1) t := try (t >> iterate_range 0 n t)
| (m+1) n t := t >> iterate_range m (n-1) t
/--
Given a tactic `tac` that takes an expression
and returns a new expression and a proof of equality,
use that tactic to change the type of the hypotheses listed in `hs`,
as well as the goal if `tgt = tt`.
Returns `tt` if any types were successfully changed.
-/
meta def replace_at (tac : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (hs : list expr) (tgt : bool) :
tactic bool :=
do to_remove ← hs.mfilter $ λ h, do {
h_type ← infer_type h,
succeeds $ do
(new_h_type, pr) ← tac h_type,
assert h.local_pp_name new_h_type,
mk_eq_mp pr h >>= tactic.exact },
goal_simplified ← succeeds $ do {
guard tgt,
(new_t, pr) ← target >>= tac,
replace_target new_t pr },
to_remove.mmap' (λ h, try (clear h)),
return (¬ to_remove.empty ∨ goal_simplified)
/-- `revert_after e` reverts all local constants after local constant `e`. -/
meta def revert_after (e : expr) : tactic ℕ := do
l ← local_context,
[pos] ← return $ l.indexes_of e | pp e >>= λ s, fail format!"No such local constant {s}",
let l := l.drop pos.succ, -- all local hypotheses after `e`
revert_lst l
/-- `generalize' e n` generalizes the target with respect to `e`. It creates a new local constant
with name `n` of the same type as `e` and replaces all occurrences of `e` by `n`.
`generalize'` is similar to `generalize` but also succeeds when `e` does not occur in the
goal, in which case it just calls `assert`.
In contrast to `generalize` it already introduces the generalized variable. -/
meta def generalize' (e : expr) (n : name) : tactic expr :=
(generalize e n >> intro1) <|> note n none e
/-!
### Various tactics related to local definitions (local constants of the form `x : α := t`)
We call `t` the value of `x`.
-/
/-- `local_def_value e` returns the value of the expression `e`, assuming that `e` has been defined
locally using a `let` expression. Otherwise it fails. -/
meta def local_def_value (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
pp e >>= λ s, -- running `pp` here, because we cannot access it in the `type_context` monad.
tactic.unsafe.type_context.run $ do
lctx <- tactic.unsafe.type_context.get_local_context,
some ldecl <- return $ lctx.get_local_decl e.local_uniq_name |
tactic.unsafe.type_context.fail format!"No such hypothesis {s}.",
some let_val <- return ldecl.value |
tactic.unsafe.type_context.fail format!"Variable {e} is not a local definition.",
return let_val
/-- `revert_deps e` reverts all the hypotheses that depend on one of the local
constants `e`, including the local definitions that have `e` in their definition.
This fixes a bug in `revert_kdeps` that does not revert local definitions for which `e` only
appears in the definition. -/
/- We cannot implement it as `revert e >> intro1`, because that would change the local constant in
the context. -/
meta def revert_deps (e : expr) : tactic ℕ := do
n ← revert_kdeps e,
l ← local_context,
[pos] ← return $ l.indexes_of e,
let l := l.drop pos.succ, -- local hypotheses after `e`
ls ← l.mfilter $ λ e', try_core (local_def_value e') >>= λ o, return $ o.elim ff $ λ e'',
e''.has_local_constant e,
n' ← revert_lst ls,
return $ n + n'
/-- `is_local_def e` succeeds when `e` is a local definition (a local constant of the form
`e : α := t`) and otherwise fails. -/
meta def is_local_def (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
retrieve $ do revert e, expr.elet _ _ _ _ ← target, skip
/-- `clear_value e` clears the body of the local definition `e`, changing it into a regular
hypothesis. A hypothesis `e : α := t` is changed to `e : α`.
This tactic is called `clearbody` in Coq. -/
meta def clear_value (e : expr) : tactic unit := do
n ← revert_after e,
is_local_def e <|>
pp e >>= λ s, fail format!"Cannot clear the body of {s}. It is not a local definition.",
let nm := e.local_pp_name,
(generalize' e nm >> clear e) <|>
fail format!"Cannot clear the body of {nm}. The resulting goal is not type correct.",
intron n
/-- A variant of `simplify_bottom_up`. Given a tactic `post` for rewriting subexpressions,
`simp_bottom_up post e` tries to rewrite `e` starting at the leaf nodes. Returns the resulting
expression and a proof of equality. -/
meta def simp_bottom_up' (post : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) :
tactic (expr × expr) :=
prod.snd <$> simplify_bottom_up () (λ _, (<$>) (prod.mk ()) ∘ post) e cfg
/-- Caches unary type classes on a type `α : Type.{univ}`. -/
meta structure instance_cache :=
(α : expr)
(univ : level)
(inst : name_map expr)
/-- Creates an `instance_cache` for the type `α`. -/
meta def mk_instance_cache (α : expr) : tactic instance_cache :=
do u ← mk_meta_univ,
infer_type α >>= unify (expr.sort (level.succ u)),
u ← get_univ_assignment u,
return ⟨α, u, mk_name_map⟩
namespace instance_cache
/-- If `n` is the name of a type class with one parameter, `get c n` tries to find an instance of
`n c.α` by checking the cache `c`. If there is no entry in the cache, it tries to find the instance
via type class resolution, and updates the cache. -/
meta def get (c : instance_cache) (n : name) : tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
match c.inst.find n with
| some i := return (c, i)
| none := do e ← mk_app n [c.α] >>= mk_instance,
return (⟨c.α, c.univ, c.inst.insert n e⟩, e)
end
open expr
/-- If `e` is a `pi` expression that binds an instance-implicit variable of type `n`,
`append_typeclasses e c l` searches `c` for an instance `p` of type `n` and returns `p :: l`. -/
meta def append_typeclasses : expr → instance_cache → list expr →
tactic (instance_cache × list expr)
| (pi _ binder_info.inst_implicit (app (const n _) (var _)) body) c l :=
do (c, p) ← c.get n, return (c, p :: l)
| _ c l := return (c, l)
/-- Creates the application `n c.α p l`, where `p` is a type class instance found in the cache `c`.
-/
meta def mk_app (c : instance_cache) (n : name) (l : list expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
do d ← get_decl n,
(c, l) ← append_typeclasses d.type.binding_body c l,
return (c, (expr.const n [c.univ]).mk_app (c.α :: l))
/-- `c.of_nat n` creates the `c.α`-valued numeral expression corresponding to `n`. -/
protected meta def of_nat (c : instance_cache) (n : ℕ) : tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
if n = 0 then c.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [] else do
(c, ai) ← c.get ``has_add,
(c, oi) ← c.get ``has_one,
(c, one) ← c.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
return (c, n.binary_rec one $ λ b n e,
if n = 0 then one else
cond b
((expr.const ``bit1 [c.univ]).mk_app [c.α, oi, ai, e])
((expr.const ``bit0 [c.univ]).mk_app [c.α, ai, e]))
/-- `c.of_int n` creates the `c.α`-valued numeral expression corresponding to `n`.
The output is either a numeral or the negation of a numeral. -/
protected meta def of_int (c : instance_cache) : ℤ → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| (n : ℕ) := c.of_nat n
| -[1+ n] := do
(c, e) ← c.of_nat (n+1),
c.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [e]
end instance_cache
private meta def get_expl_pi_arity_aux : expr → tactic nat
| (expr.pi n bi d b) :=
do m ← mk_fresh_name,
let l := expr.local_const m n bi d,
new_b ← whnf (expr.instantiate_var b l),
r ← get_expl_pi_arity_aux new_b,
if bi = binder_info.default then
return (r + 1)
else
return r
| e := return 0
/-- Compute the arity of explicit arguments of the given (Pi-)type. -/
meta def get_expl_pi_arity (type : expr) : tactic nat :=
whnf type >>= get_expl_pi_arity_aux
/-- Compute the arity of explicit arguments of the given function. -/
meta def get_expl_arity (fn : expr) : tactic nat :=
infer_type fn >>= get_expl_pi_arity
/-- Auxilliary defintion for `get_pi_binders`. -/
meta def get_pi_binders_aux : list binder → expr → tactic (list binder × expr)
| es (expr.pi n bi d b) :=
do m ← mk_fresh_name,
let l := expr.local_const m n bi d,
let new_b := expr.instantiate_var b l,
get_pi_binders_aux (⟨n, bi, d⟩::es) new_b
| es e := return (es, e)
/-- Get the binders and target of a pi-type. Instantiates bound variables by
local constants. Cf. `pi_binders` in `meta.expr` (which produces open terms).
See also `mk_local_pis` in `init.core.tactic` which does almost the same. -/
meta def get_pi_binders : expr → tactic (list binder × expr) | e :=
do (es, e) ← get_pi_binders_aux [] e, return (es.reverse, e)
/-- Auxilliary definition for `get_pi_binders_dep`. -/
meta def get_pi_binders_dep_aux : ℕ → expr → tactic (list (ℕ × binder) × expr)
| n (expr.pi nm bi d b) :=
do l ← mk_local' nm bi d,
(ls, r) ← get_pi_binders_dep_aux (n+1) (expr.instantiate_var b l),
return (if b.has_var then ls else (n, ⟨nm, bi, d⟩)::ls, r)
| n e := return ([], e)
/-- A variant of `get_pi_binders` that only returns the binders that do not occur in later
arguments or in the target. Also returns the argument position of each returned binder. -/
meta def get_pi_binders_dep : expr → tactic (list (ℕ × binder) × expr) :=
get_pi_binders_dep_aux 0
/-- A variation on `assert` where a (possibly incomplete)
proof of the assertion is provided as a parameter.
``(h,gs) ← local_proof `h p tac`` creates a local `h : p` and
use `tac` to (partially) construct a proof for it. `gs` is the
list of remaining goals in the proof of `h`.
The benefits over assert are:
- unlike with ``h ← assert `h p, tac`` , `h` cannot be used by `tac`;
- when `tac` does not complete the proof of `h`, returning the list
of goals allows one to write a tactic using `h` and with the confidence
that a proof will not boil over to goals left over from the proof of `h`,
unlike what would be the case when using `tactic.swap`.
-/
meta def local_proof (h : name) (p : expr) (tac₀ : tactic unit) :
tactic (expr × list expr) :=
focus1 $
do h' ← assert h p,
[g₀,g₁] ← get_goals,
set_goals [g₀], tac₀,
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [g₁],
return (h', gs)
/-- `var_names e` returns a list of the unique names of the initial pi bindings in `e`. -/
meta def var_names : expr → list name
| (expr.pi n _ _ b) := n :: var_names b
| _ := []
/-- When `struct_n` is the name of a structure type,
`subobject_names struct_n` returns two lists of names `(instances, fields)`.
The names in `instances` are the projections from `struct_n` to the structures that it extends
(assuming it was defined with `old_structure_cmd false`).
The names in `fields` are the standard fields of `struct_n`. -/
meta def subobject_names (struct_n : name) : tactic (list name × list name) :=
do env ← get_env,
[c] ← pure $ env.constructors_of struct_n | fail "too many constructors",
vs ← var_names <$> (mk_const c >>= infer_type),
fields ← env.structure_fields struct_n,
return $ fields.partition (λ fn, ↑("_" ++ fn.to_string) ∈ vs)
private meta def expanded_field_list' : name → tactic (dlist $ name × name) | struct_n :=
do (so,fs) ← subobject_names struct_n,
ts ← so.mmap (λ n, do
(_, e) ← mk_const (n.update_prefix struct_n) >>= infer_type >>= mk_local_pis,
expanded_field_list' $ e.get_app_fn.const_name),
return $ dlist.join ts ++ dlist.of_list (fs.map $ prod.mk struct_n)
open functor function
/-- `expanded_field_list struct_n` produces a list of the names of the fields of the structure
named `struct_n`. These are returned as pairs of names `(prefix, name)`, where the full name
of the projection is `prefix.name`. -/
meta def expanded_field_list (struct_n : name) : tactic (list $ name × name) :=
dlist.to_list <$> expanded_field_list' struct_n
/--
Return a list of all type classes which can be instantiated
for the given expression.
-/
meta def get_classes (e : expr) : tactic (list name) :=
attribute.get_instances `class >>= list.mfilter (λ n,
succeeds $ mk_app n [e] >>= mk_instance)
open nat
/-- Create a list of `n` fresh metavariables. -/
meta def mk_mvar_list : ℕ → tactic (list expr)
| 0 := pure []
| (succ n) := (::) <$> mk_mvar <*> mk_mvar_list n
/-- Returns the only goal, or fails if there isn't just one goal. -/
meta def get_goal : tactic expr :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| [a] := return a
| [] := fail "there are no goals"
| _ := fail "there are too many goals"
end
/-- `iterate_at_most_on_all_goals n t`: repeat the given tactic at most `n` times on all goals,
or until it fails. Always succeeds. -/
meta def iterate_at_most_on_all_goals : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 tac := trace "maximal iterations reached"
| (succ n) tac := tactic.all_goals' $ (do tac, iterate_at_most_on_all_goals n tac) <|> skip
/-- `iterate_at_most_on_subgoals n t`: repeat the tactic `t` at most `n` times on the first
goal and on all subgoals thus produced, or until it fails. Fails iff `t` fails on
current goal. -/
meta def iterate_at_most_on_subgoals : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 tac := trace "maximal iterations reached"
| (succ n) tac := focus1 (do tac, iterate_at_most_on_all_goals n tac)
/-- `apply_list l`: try to apply the tactics in the list `l` on the first goal, and
fail if none succeeds -/
meta def apply_list_expr : list expr → tactic unit
| [] := fail "no matching rule"
| (h::t) := do interactive.concat_tags (apply h) <|> apply_list_expr t
/-- constructs a list of expressions given a list of p-expressions, as follows:
- if the p-expression is the name of a theorem, use `i_to_expr_for_apply` on it
- if the p-expression is a user attribute, add all the theorems with this attribute
to the list.-/
meta def build_list_expr_for_apply : list pexpr → tactic (list expr)
| [] := return []
| (h::t) := do
tail ← build_list_expr_for_apply t,
a ← i_to_expr_for_apply h,
(do l ← attribute.get_instances (expr.const_name a),
m ← list.mmap mk_const l,
return (m.append tail))
<|> return (a::tail)
/--`apply_rules hs n`: apply the list of rules `hs` (given as pexpr) and `assumption` on the
first goal and the resulting subgoals, iteratively, at most `n` times.
Unlike `solve_by_elim`, `apply_rules` does not do any backtracking, and just greedily applies
a lemma from the list until it can't.
-/
meta def apply_rules (hs : list pexpr) (n : nat) : tactic unit :=
do l ← build_list_expr_for_apply hs,
iterate_at_most_on_subgoals n (assumption <|> apply_list_expr l)
/-- `replace h p` elaborates the pexpr `p`, clears the existing hypothesis named `h` from the local
context, and adds a new hypothesis named `h`. The type of this hypothesis is the type of `p`.
Fails if there is nothing named `h` in the local context. -/
meta def replace (h : name) (p : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
do h' ← get_local h,
p ← to_expr p,
note h none p,
clear h'
/-- Auxiliary function for `iff_mp` and `iff_mpr`. Takes a name, which should be either `` `iff.mp``
or `` `iff.mpr``. If the passed expression is an iterated function type eventually producing an
`iff`, returns an expression with the `iff` converted to either the forwards or backwards
implication, as requested. -/
meta def mk_iff_mp_app (iffmp : name) : expr → (nat → expr) → option expr
| (expr.pi n bi e t) f := expr.lam n bi e <$> mk_iff_mp_app t (λ n, f (n+1) (expr.var n))
| `(%%a ↔ %%b) f := some $ @expr.const tt iffmp [] a b (f 0)
| _ f := none
/-- `iff_mp_core e ty` assumes that `ty` is the type of `e`.
If `ty` has the shape `Π ..., A ↔ B`, returns an expression whose type is `Π ..., A → B`. -/
meta def iff_mp_core (e ty: expr) : option expr :=
mk_iff_mp_app `iff.mp ty (λ_, e)
/-- `iff_mpr_core e ty` assumes that `ty` is the type of `e`.
If `ty` has the shape `Π ..., A ↔ B`, returns an expression whose type is `Π ..., B → A`. -/
meta def iff_mpr_core (e ty: expr) : option expr :=
mk_iff_mp_app `iff.mpr ty (λ_, e)
/-- Given an expression whose type is (a possibly iterated function producing) an `iff`,
create the expression which is the forward implication. -/
meta def iff_mp (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
do t ← infer_type e,
iff_mp_core e t <|> fail "Target theorem must have the form `Π x y z, a ↔ b`"
/-- Given an expression whose type is (a possibly iterated function producing) an `iff`,
create the expression which is the reverse implication. -/
meta def iff_mpr (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
do t ← infer_type e,
iff_mpr_core e t <|> fail "Target theorem must have the form `Π x y z, a ↔ b`"
/--
Attempts to apply `e`, and if that fails, if `e` is an `iff`,
try applying both directions separately.
-/
meta def apply_iff (e : expr) : tactic (list (name × expr)) :=
let ap e := tactic.apply e {new_goals := new_goals.non_dep_only} in
ap e <|> (iff_mp e >>= ap) <|> (iff_mpr e >>= ap)
/--
Configuration options for `apply_any`:
* `use_symmetry`: if `apply_any` fails to apply any lemma, call `symmetry` and try again.
* `use_exfalso`: if `apply_any` fails to apply any lemma, call `exfalso` and try again.
* `apply`: specify an alternative to `tactic.apply`; usually `apply := tactic.eapply`.
-/
meta structure apply_any_opt :=
(use_symmetry : bool := tt)
(use_exfalso : bool := tt)
(apply : expr → tactic (list (name × expr)) := tactic.apply)
/--
This is a version of `apply_any` that takes a list of `tactic expr`s instead of `expr`s,
and evaluates these as thunks before trying to apply them.
We need to do this to avoid metavariables getting stuck during subsequent rounds of `apply`.
-/
meta def apply_any_thunk
(lemmas : list (tactic expr))
(opt : apply_any_opt := {})
(tac : tactic unit := skip) : tactic unit :=
do
let modes := [skip]
++ (if opt.use_symmetry then [symmetry] else [])
++ (if opt.use_exfalso then [exfalso] else []),
modes.any_of (λ m, do m,
lemmas.any_of (λ H, H >>= opt.apply >> tac)) <|>
fail "apply_any tactic failed; no lemma could be applied"
/--
`apply_any lemmas` tries to apply one of the list `lemmas` to the current goal.
`apply_any lemmas opt` allows control over how lemmas are applied.
`opt` has fields:
* `use_symmetry`: if no lemma applies, call `symmetry` and try again. (Defaults to `tt`.)
* `use_exfalso`: if no lemma applies, call `exfalso` and try again. (Defaults to `tt`.)
* `apply`: use a tactic other than `tactic.apply` (e.g. `tactic.fapply` or `tactic.eapply`).
`apply_any lemmas tac` calls the tactic `tac` after a successful application.
Defaults to `skip`. This is used, for example, by `solve_by_elim` to arrange
recursive invocations of `apply_any`.
-/
meta def apply_any
(lemmas : list expr)
(opt : apply_any_opt := {})
(tac : tactic unit := skip) : tactic unit :=
apply_any_thunk (lemmas.map pure) opt tac
/-- Try to apply a hypothesis from the local context to the goal. -/
meta def apply_assumption : tactic unit :=
local_context >>= apply_any
/-- `change_core e none` is equivalent to `change e`. It tries to change the goal to `e` and fails
if this is not a definitional equality.
`change_core e (some h)` assumes `h` is a local constant, and tries to change the type of `h` to `e`
by reverting `h`, changing the goal, and reintroducing hypotheses. -/
meta def change_core (e : expr) : option expr → tactic unit
| none := tactic.change e
| (some h) :=
do num_reverted : ℕ ← revert h,
expr.pi n bi d b ← target,
tactic.change $ expr.pi n bi e b,
intron num_reverted
/--
`change_with_at olde newe hyp` replaces occurences of `olde` with `newe` at hypothesis `hyp`,
assuming `olde` and `newe` are defeq when elaborated.
-/
meta def change_with_at (olde newe : pexpr) (hyp : name) : tactic unit :=
do h ← get_local hyp,
tp ← infer_type h,
olde ← to_expr olde, newe ← to_expr newe,
let repl_tp := tp.replace (λ a n, if a = olde then some newe else none),
when (repl_tp ≠ tp) $ change_core repl_tp (some h)
/-- Returns a list of all metavariables in the current partial proof. This can differ from
the list of goals, since the goals can be manually edited. -/
meta def metavariables : tactic (list expr) :=
expr.list_meta_vars <$> result
/-- Fail if the target contains a metavariable. -/
meta def no_mvars_in_target : tactic unit :=
expr.has_meta_var <$> target >>= guardb ∘ bnot
/-- Succeeds only if the current goal is a proposition. -/
meta def propositional_goal : tactic unit :=
do g :: _ ← get_goals,
is_proof g >>= guardb
/-- Succeeds only if we can construct an instance showing the
current goal is a subsingleton type. -/
meta def subsingleton_goal : tactic unit :=
do g :: _ ← get_goals,
ty ← infer_type g >>= instantiate_mvars,
to_expr ``(subsingleton %%ty) >>= mk_instance >> skip
/--
Succeeds only if the current goal is "terminal",
in the sense that no other goals depend on it
(except possibly through shared metavariables; see `independent_goal`).
-/
meta def terminal_goal : tactic unit :=
propositional_goal <|> subsingleton_goal <|>
do g₀ :: _ ← get_goals,
mvars ← (λ L, list.erase L g₀) <$> metavariables,
mvars.mmap' $ λ g, do
t ← infer_type g >>= instantiate_mvars,
d ← kdepends_on t g₀,
monad.whenb d $
pp t >>= λ s, fail ("The current goal is not terminal: " ++ s.to_string ++ " depends on it.")
/--
Succeeds only if the current goal is "independent", in the sense
that no other goals depend on it, even through shared meta-variables.
-/
meta def independent_goal : tactic unit :=
no_mvars_in_target >> terminal_goal
/-- `triv'` tries to close the first goal with the proof `trivial : true`. Unlike `triv`,
it only unfolds reducible definitions, so it sometimes fails faster. -/
meta def triv' : tactic unit := do c ← mk_const `trivial, exact c reducible
variable {α : Type}
/-- Apply a tactic as many times as possible, collecting the results in a list.
Fail if the tactic does not succeed at least once. -/
meta def iterate1 (t : tactic α) : tactic (list α) :=
do r ← decorate_ex "iterate1 failed: tactic did not succeed" t,
L ← iterate t,
return (r :: L)
/-- Introduces one or more variables and returns the new local constants.
Fails if `intro` cannot be applied. -/
meta def intros1 : tactic (list expr) :=
iterate1 intro1
/-- Run a tactic "under binders", by running `intros` before, and `revert` afterwards. -/
meta def under_binders {α : Type} (t : tactic α) : tactic α :=
do
v ← intros,
r ← t,
revert_lst v,
return r
namespace interactive
/-- Run a tactic "under binders", by running `intros` before, and `revert` afterwards. -/
meta def under_binders (i : itactic) : itactic := tactic.under_binders i
end interactive
/-- `successes` invokes each tactic in turn, returning the list of successful results. -/
meta def successes (tactics : list (tactic α)) : tactic (list α) :=
list.filter_map id <$> monad.sequence (tactics.map (λ t, try_core t))
/--
Try all the tactics in a list, each time starting at the original `tactic_state`,
returning the list of successful results,
and reverting to the original `tactic_state`.
-/
-- Note this is not the same as `successes`, which keeps track of the evolving `tactic_state`.
meta def try_all {α : Type} (tactics : list (tactic α)) : tactic (list α) :=
λ s, result.success
(tactics.map $
λ t : tactic α,
match t s with
| result.success a s' := [a]
| _ := []
end).join s
/--
Try all the tactics in a list, each time starting at the original `tactic_state`,
returning the list of successful results sorted by
the value produced by a subsequent execution of the `sort_by` tactic,
and reverting to the original `tactic_state`.
-/
meta def try_all_sorted {α : Type} (tactics : list (tactic α)) (sort_by : tactic ℕ := num_goals) :
tactic (list (α × ℕ)) :=
λ s, result.success
((tactics.map $
λ t : tactic α,
match (do a ← t, n ← sort_by, return (a, n)) s with
| result.success a s' := [a]
| _ := []
end).join.qsort (λ p q : α × ℕ, p.2 < q.2)) s
/-- Return target after instantiating metavars and whnf. -/
private meta def target' : tactic expr :=
target >>= instantiate_mvars >>= whnf
/--
Just like `split`, `fsplit` applies the constructor when the type of the target is
an inductive data type with one constructor.
However it does not reorder goals or invoke `auto_param` tactics.
-/
-- FIXME check if we can remove `auto_param := ff`
meta def fsplit : tactic unit :=
do [c] ← target' >>= get_constructors_for |
fail "fsplit tactic failed, target is not an inductive datatype with only one constructor",
mk_const c >>= λ e, apply e {new_goals := new_goals.all, auto_param := ff} >> skip
run_cmd add_interactive [`fsplit]
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "fsplit",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.fsplit],
tags := ["logic", "goal management"] }
/-- Calls `injection` on each hypothesis, and then, for each hypothesis on which `injection`
succeeds, clears the old hypothesis. -/
meta def injections_and_clear : tactic unit :=
do l ← local_context,
results ← successes $ l.map $ λ e, injection e >> clear e,
when (results.empty) (fail "could not use `injection` then `clear` on any hypothesis")
run_cmd add_interactive [`injections_and_clear]
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "injections_and_clear",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.injections_and_clear],
tags := ["context management"] }
/-- Calls `cases` on every local hypothesis, succeeding if
it succeeds on at least one hypothesis. -/
meta def case_bash : tactic unit :=
do l ← local_context,
r ← successes (l.reverse.map (λ h, cases h >> skip)),
when (r.empty) failed
/--
`note_anon t v`, given a proof `v : t`,
adds `h : t` to the current context, where the name `h` is fresh.
`note_anon none v` will infer the type `t` from `v`.
-/
-- While `note` provides a default value for `t`, it doesn't seem this could ever be used.
meta def note_anon (t : option expr) (v : expr) : tactic expr :=
do h ← get_unused_name `h none,
note h t v
/-- `find_local t` returns a local constant with type t, or fails if none exists. -/
meta def find_local (t : pexpr) : tactic expr :=
do t' ← to_expr t,
(prod.snd <$> solve_aux t' assumption >>= instantiate_mvars) <|>
fail format!"No hypothesis found of the form: {t'}"
/-- `dependent_pose_core l`: introduce dependent hypotheses, where the proofs depend on the values
of the previous local constants. `l` is a list of local constants and their values. -/
meta def dependent_pose_core (l : list (expr × expr)) : tactic unit := do
let lc := l.map prod.fst,
let lm := l.map (λ⟨l, v⟩, (l.local_uniq_name, v)),
t ← target,
new_goal ← mk_meta_var (t.pis lc),
old::other_goals ← get_goals,
set_goals (old :: new_goal :: other_goals),
exact ((new_goal.mk_app lc).instantiate_locals lm),
return ()
/-- Like `mk_local_pis` but translating into weak head normal form before checking if it is a `Π`.
-/
meta def mk_local_pis_whnf : expr → tactic (list expr × expr) | e := do
(expr.pi n bi d b) ← whnf e | return ([], e),
p ← mk_local' n bi d,
(ps, r) ← mk_local_pis (expr.instantiate_var b p),
return ((p :: ps), r)
/-- Changes `(h : ∀xs, ∃a:α, p a) ⊢ g` to `(d : ∀xs, a) (s : ∀xs, p (d xs) ⊢ g`. -/
meta def choose1 (h : expr) (data : name) (spec : name) : tactic expr := do
t ← infer_type h,
(ctxt, t) ← mk_local_pis_whnf t,
`(@Exists %%α %%p) ← whnf t transparency.all |
fail "expected a term of the shape ∀xs, ∃a, p xs a",
α_t ← infer_type α,
expr.sort u ← whnf α_t transparency.all,
value ← mk_local_def data (α.pis ctxt),
t' ← head_beta (p.app (value.mk_app ctxt)),
spec ← mk_local_def spec (t'.pis ctxt),
dependent_pose_core [
(value, ((((expr.const `classical.some [u]).app α).app p).app (h.mk_app ctxt)).lambdas ctxt),
(spec, ((((expr.const `classical.some_spec [u]).app α).app p).app (h.mk_app ctxt)).lambdas ctxt)],
try (tactic.clear h),
intro1,
intro1
/-- Changes `(h : ∀xs, ∃as, p as) ⊢ g` to a list of functions `as`,
and a final hypothesis on `p as`. -/
meta def choose : expr → list name → tactic unit
| h [] := fail "expect list of variables"
| h [n] := do
cnt ← revert h,
intro n,
intron (cnt - 1),
return ()
| h (n::ns) := do
v ← get_unused_name >>= choose1 h n,
choose v ns
/--
Instantiates metavariables that appear in the current goal.
-/
meta def instantiate_mvars_in_target : tactic unit :=
target >>= instantiate_mvars >>= change
/--
Instantiates metavariables in all goals.
-/
meta def instantiate_mvars_in_goals : tactic unit :=
all_goals' $ instantiate_mvars_in_target
/-- This makes sure that the execution of the tactic does not change the tactic state.
This can be helpful while using rewrite, apply, or expr munging.
Remember to instantiate your metavariables before you're done! -/
meta def lock_tactic_state {α} (t : tactic α) : tactic α
| s := match t s with
| result.success a s' := result.success a s
| result.exception msg pos s' := result.exception msg pos s
end
/-- Similar to `mk_local_pis` but make meta variables instead of
local constants. -/
meta def mk_meta_pis : expr → tactic (list expr × expr)
| (expr.pi n bi d b) := do
p ← mk_meta_var d,
(ps, r) ← mk_meta_pis (expr.instantiate_var b p),
return ((p :: ps), r)
| e := return ([], e)
/-- Protect the declaration `n` -/
meta def mk_protected (n : name) : tactic unit :=
do env ← get_env, set_env (env.mk_protected n)
end tactic
namespace lean.parser
open tactic interaction_monad
/-- `emit_command_here str` behaves as if the string `str` were placed as a user command at the
current line. -/
meta def emit_command_here (str : string) : lean.parser string :=
do (_, left) ← with_input command_like str,
return left
/-- `emit_code_here str` behaves as if the string `str` were placed at the current location in
source code. -/
meta def emit_code_here : string → lean.parser unit
| str := do left ← emit_command_here str,
if left.length = 0 then return ()
else emit_code_here left
/-- `get_current_namespace` returns the current namespace (it could be `name.anonymous`).
This function deserves a C++ implementation in core lean, and will fail if it is not called from
the body of a command (i.e. anywhere else that the `lean.parser` monad can be invoked). -/
meta def get_current_namespace : lean.parser name :=
do n ← tactic.mk_user_fresh_name,
emit_code_here $ sformat!"def {n} := ()",
nfull ← tactic.resolve_constant n,
return $ nfull.get_nth_prefix n.components.length
/-- `get_variables` returns a list of existing variable names, along with their types and binder
info. -/
meta def get_variables : lean.parser (list (name × binder_info × expr)) :=
list.map expr.get_local_const_kind <$> list_available_include_vars
/-- `get_included_variables` returns those variables `v` returned by `get_variables` which have been
"included" by an `include v` statement and are not (yet) `omit`ed. -/
meta def get_included_variables : lean.parser (list (name × binder_info × expr)) :=
do ns ← list_include_var_names,
list.filter (λ v, v.1 ∈ ns) <$> get_variables
/-- From the `lean.parser` monad, synthesize a `tactic_state` which includes all of the local
variables referenced in `es : list pexpr`, and those variables which have been `include`ed in the
local context---precisely those variables which would be ambiently accessible if we were in a
tactic-mode block where the goals had types `es.mmap to_expr`, for example.
Returns a new `ts : tactic_state` with these local variables added, and
`mappings : list (expr × expr)`, for which pairs `(var, hyp)` correspond to an existing variable
`var` and the local hypothesis `hyp` which was added to the tactic state `ts` as a result. -/
meta def synthesize_tactic_state_with_variables_as_hyps (es : list pexpr)
: lean.parser (tactic_state × list (expr × expr)) :=
do /- First, in order to get `to_expr e` to resolve declared `variables`, we add all of the
declared variables to a fake `tactic_state`, and perform the resolution. At the end,
`to_expr e` has done the work of determining which variables were actually referenced, which
we then obtain from `fe` via `expr.list_local_consts` (which, importantly, is not defined for
`pexpr`s). -/
vars ← list_available_include_vars,
fake_es ← lean.parser.of_tactic $ lock_tactic_state $ do {
/- Note that `add_local_consts_as_local_hyps` returns the mappings it generated, but we discard
them on this first pass. (We return the mappings generated by our second invocation of this
function below.) -/
add_local_consts_as_local_hyps vars,
es.mmap to_expr
},
/- Now calculate lists of a) the explicitly `include`ed variables and b) the variables which were
referenced in `e` when it was resolved to `fake_e`.
It is important that we include variables of the kind a) because we want `simp` to have access
to declared local instances, and it is important that we only restrict to variables of kind a)
and b) together since we do not to recognise a hypothesis which is posited as a `variable`
in the environment but not referenced in the `pexpr` we were passed.
One use case for this behaviour is running `simp` on the passed `pexpr`, since we do not want
simp to use arbitrary hypotheses which were declared as `variables` in the local environment
but not referenced in the expression to simplify (as one would be expect generally in tactic
mode). -/
included_vars ← list_include_var_names,
let referenced_vars := list.join $ fake_es.map $ λ e, e.list_local_consts.map expr.local_pp_name,
/- Look up the explicit `included_vars` and the `referenced_vars` (which have appeared in the
`pexpr` list which we were passed.) -/
let directly_included_vars := vars.filter $ λ var,
(var.local_pp_name ∈ included_vars) ∨ (var.local_pp_name ∈ referenced_vars),
/- Inflate the list `directly_included_vars` to include those variables which are "implicitly
included" by virtue of reference to one or multiple others. For example, given
`variables (n : ℕ) [prime n] [ih : even n]`, a reference to `n` implies that the typeclass
instance `prime n` should be included, but `ih : even n` should not. -/
let all_implicitly_included_vars :=
expr.all_implicitly_included_variables vars directly_included_vars,
/- Capture a tactic state where both of these kinds of variables have been added as local
hypotheses, and resolve `e` against this state with `to_expr`, this time for real. -/
lean.parser.of_tactic $ do {
mappings ← add_local_consts_as_local_hyps all_implicitly_included_vars,
ts ← get_state,
return (ts, mappings)
}
end lean.parser
namespace tactic
variables {α : Type}
/--
Hole command used to fill in a structure's field when specifying an instance.
In the following:
```lean
instance : monad id :=
{! !}
```
invoking the hole command "Instance Stub" ("Generate a skeleton for the structure under
construction.") produces:
```lean
instance : monad id :=
{ map := _,
map_const := _,
pure := _,
seq := _,
seq_left := _,
seq_right := _,
bind := _ }
```
-/
@[hole_command] meta def instance_stub : hole_command :=
{ name := "Instance Stub",
descr := "Generate a skeleton for the structure under construction.",
action := λ _,
do tgt ← target >>= whnf,
let cl := tgt.get_app_fn.const_name,
env ← get_env,
fs ← expanded_field_list cl,
let fs := fs.map prod.snd,
let fs := format.intercalate (",\n " : format) $ fs.map (λ fn, format!"{fn} := _"),
let out := format.to_string format!"{{ {fs} }",
return [(out,"")] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "instance_stub",
category := doc_category.hole_cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.instance_stub],
tags := ["instances"] }
/-- Like `resolve_name` except when the list of goals is
empty. In that situation `resolve_name` fails whereas
`resolve_name'` simply proceeds on a dummy goal -/
meta def resolve_name' (n : name) : tactic pexpr :=
do [] ← get_goals | resolve_name n,
g ← mk_mvar,
set_goals [g],
resolve_name n <* set_goals []
private meta def strip_prefix' (n : name) : list string → name → tactic name
| s name.anonymous := pure $ s.foldl (flip name.mk_string) name.anonymous
| s (name.mk_string a p) :=
do let n' := s.foldl (flip name.mk_string) name.anonymous,
do { n'' ← tactic.resolve_constant n',
if n'' = n
then pure n'
else strip_prefix' (a :: s) p }
<|> strip_prefix' (a :: s) p
| s n@(name.mk_numeral a p) := pure $ s.foldl (flip name.mk_string) n
/-- Strips unnecessary prefixes from a name, e.g. if a namespace is open. -/
meta def strip_prefix : name → tactic name
| n@(name.mk_string a a_1) :=
if (`_private).is_prefix_of n
then let n' := n.update_prefix name.anonymous in
n' <$ resolve_name' n' <|> pure n
else strip_prefix' n [a] a_1
| n := pure n
/-- Used to format return strings for the hole commands `match_stub` and `eqn_stub`. -/
meta def mk_patterns (t : expr) : tactic (list format) :=
do let cl := t.get_app_fn.const_name,
env ← get_env,
let fs := env.constructors_of cl,
fs.mmap $ λ f,
do { (vs,_) ← mk_const f >>= infer_type >>= mk_local_pis,
let vs := vs.filter (λ v, v.is_default_local),
vs ← vs.mmap (λ v,
do v' ← get_unused_name v.local_pp_name,
pose v' none `(()),
pure v' ),
vs.mmap' $ λ v, get_local v >>= clear,
let args := list.intersperse (" " : format) $ vs.map to_fmt,
f ← strip_prefix f,
if args.empty
then pure $ format!"| {f} := _\n"
else pure format!"| ({f} {format.join args}) := _\n" }
/--
Hole command used to generate a `match` expression.
In the following:
```lean
meta def foo (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
{! e !}
```
invoking hole command "Match Stub" ("Generate a list of equations for a `match` expression")
produces:
```lean
meta def foo (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
match e with
| (expr.var a) := _
| (expr.sort a) := _
| (expr.const a a_1) := _
| (expr.mvar a a_1 a_2) := _
| (expr.local_const a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.app a a_1) := _
| (expr.lam a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.pi a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.elet a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.macro a a_1) := _
end
```
-/
@[hole_command] meta def match_stub : hole_command :=
{ name := "Match Stub",
descr := "Generate a list of equations for a `match` expression.",
action := λ es,
do [e] ← pure es | fail "expecting one expression",
e ← to_expr e,
t ← infer_type e >>= whnf,
fs ← mk_patterns t,
e ← pp e,
let out := format.to_string format!"match {e} with\n{format.join fs}end\n",
return [(out,"")] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "Match Stub",
category := doc_category.hole_cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.match_stub],
tags := ["pattern matching"] }
/--
Invoking hole command "Equations Stub" ("Generate a list of equations for a recursive definition")
in the following:
```lean
meta def foo : {! expr → tactic unit !} -- `:=` is omitted
```
produces:
```lean
meta def foo : expr → tactic unit
| (expr.var a) := _
| (expr.sort a) := _
| (expr.const a a_1) := _
| (expr.mvar a a_1 a_2) := _
| (expr.local_const a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.app a a_1) := _
| (expr.lam a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.pi a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.elet a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.macro a a_1) := _
```
A similar result can be obtained by invoking "Equations Stub" on the following:
```lean
meta def foo : expr → tactic unit := -- do not forget to write `:=`!!
{! !}
```
```lean
meta def foo : expr → tactic unit := -- don't forget to erase `:=`!!
| (expr.var a) := _
| (expr.sort a) := _
| (expr.const a a_1) := _
| (expr.mvar a a_1 a_2) := _
| (expr.local_const a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.app a a_1) := _
| (expr.lam a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.pi a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.elet a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.macro a a_1) := _
```
-/
@[hole_command] meta def eqn_stub : hole_command :=
{ name := "Equations Stub",
descr := "Generate a list of equations for a recursive definition.",
action := λ es,
do t ← match es with
| [t] := to_expr t
| [] := target
| _ := fail "expecting one type"
end,
e ← whnf t,
(v :: _,_) ← mk_local_pis e | fail "expecting a Pi-type",
t' ← infer_type v,
fs ← mk_patterns t',
t ← pp t,
let out :=
if es.empty then
format.to_string format!"-- do not forget to erase `:=`!!\n{format.join fs}"
else format.to_string format!"{t}\n{format.join fs}",
return [(out,"")] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "Equations Stub",
category := doc_category.hole_cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.eqn_stub],
tags := ["pattern matching"] }
/--
This command lists the constructors that can be used to satisfy the expected type.
Invoking "List Constructors" ("Show the list of constructors of the expected type")
in the following hole:
```lean
def foo : ℤ ⊕ ℕ :=
{! !}
```
produces:
```lean
def foo : ℤ ⊕ ℕ :=
{! sum.inl, sum.inr !}
```
and will display:
```lean
sum.inl : ℤ → ℤ ⊕ ℕ
sum.inr : ℕ → ℤ ⊕ ℕ
```
-/
@[hole_command] meta def list_constructors_hole : hole_command :=
{ name := "List Constructors",
descr := "Show the list of constructors of the expected type.",
action := λ es,
do t ← target >>= whnf,
(_,t) ← mk_local_pis t,
let cl := t.get_app_fn.const_name,
let args := t.get_app_args,
env ← get_env,
let cs := env.constructors_of cl,
ts ← cs.mmap $ λ c,
do { e ← mk_const c,
t ← infer_type (e.mk_app args) >>= pp,
c ← strip_prefix c,
pure format!"\n{c} : {t}\n" },
fs ← format.intercalate ", " <$> cs.mmap (strip_prefix >=> pure ∘ to_fmt),
let out := format.to_string format!"{{! {fs} !}",
trace (format.join ts).to_string,
return [(out,"")] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "List Constructors",
category := doc_category.hole_cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.list_constructors_hole],
tags := ["goal information"] }
/-- Makes the declaration `classical.prop_decidable` available to type class inference.
This asserts that all propositions are decidable, but does not have computational content. -/
meta def classical : tactic unit :=
do h ← get_unused_name `_inst,
mk_const `classical.prop_decidable >>= note h none,
reset_instance_cache
open expr
/-- `mk_comp v e` checks whether `e` is a sequence of nested applications `f (g (h v))`, and if so,
returns the expression `f ∘ g ∘ h`. -/
meta def mk_comp (v : expr) : expr → tactic expr
| (app f e) :=
if e = v then pure f
else do
guard (¬ v.occurs f) <|> fail "bad guard",
e' ← mk_comp e >>= instantiate_mvars,
f ← instantiate_mvars f,
mk_mapp ``function.comp [none,none,none,f,e']
| e :=
do guard (e = v),
t ← infer_type e,
mk_mapp ``id [t]
/--
From a lemma of the shape `∀ x, f (g x) = h x`
derive an auxiliary lemma of the form `f ∘ g = h`
for reasoning about higher-order functions.
-/
meta def mk_higher_order_type : expr → tactic expr
| (pi n bi d b@(pi _ _ _ _)) :=
do v ← mk_local_def n d,
let b' := (b.instantiate_var v),
(pi n bi d ∘ flip abstract_local v.local_uniq_name) <$> mk_higher_order_type b'
| (pi n bi d b) :=
do v ← mk_local_def n d,
let b' := (b.instantiate_var v),
(l,r) ← match_eq b' <|> fail format!"not an equality {b'}",
l' ← mk_comp v l,
r' ← mk_comp v r,
mk_app ``eq [l',r']
| e := failed
open lean.parser interactive.types
/-- A user attribute that applies to lemmas of the shape `∀ x, f (g x) = h x`.
It derives an auxiliary lemma of the form `f ∘ g = h` for reasoning about higher-order functions.
-/
@[user_attribute]
meta def higher_order_attr : user_attribute unit (option name) :=
{ name := `higher_order,
parser := optional ident,
descr :=
"From a lemma of the shape `∀ x, f (g x) = h x` derive an auxiliary lemma of the
form `f ∘ g = h` for reasoning about higher-order functions.",
after_set := some $ λ lmm _ _,
do env ← get_env,
decl ← env.get lmm,
let num := decl.univ_params.length,
let lvls := (list.iota num).map (`l).append_after,
let l : expr := expr.const lmm $ lvls.map level.param,
t ← infer_type l >>= instantiate_mvars,
t' ← mk_higher_order_type t,
(_,pr) ← solve_aux t' $ do {
intros, applyc ``_root_.funext, intro1, applyc lmm; assumption },
pr ← instantiate_mvars pr,
lmm' ← higher_order_attr.get_param lmm,
lmm' ← (flip name.update_prefix lmm.get_prefix <$> lmm') <|> pure lmm.add_prime,
add_decl $ declaration.thm lmm' lvls t' (pure pr),
copy_attribute `simp lmm lmm',
copy_attribute `functor_norm lmm lmm' }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "higher_order",
category := doc_category.attr,
decl_names := [`tactic.higher_order_attr],
tags := ["lemma derivation"] }
attribute [higher_order map_comp_pure] map_pure
/--
Use `refine` to partially discharge the goal,
or call `fconstructor` and try again.
-/
private meta def use_aux (h : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
(focus1 (refine h >> done)) <|> (fconstructor >> use_aux)
/-- Similar to `existsi`, `use l` will use entries in `l` to instantiate existential obligations
at the beginning of a target. Unlike `existsi`, the pexprs in `l` are elaborated with respect to
the expected type.
```lean
example : ∃ x : ℤ, x = x :=
by tactic.use ``(42)
```
See the doc string for `tactic.interactive.use` for more information.
-/
protected meta def use (l : list pexpr) : tactic unit :=
focus1 $ seq' (l.mmap' $ λ h, use_aux h <|> fail format!"failed to instantiate goal with {h}")
instantiate_mvars_in_target
/-- `clear_aux_decl_aux l` clears all expressions in `l` that represent aux decls from the
local context. -/
meta def clear_aux_decl_aux : list expr → tactic unit
| [] := skip
| (e::l) := do cond e.is_aux_decl (tactic.clear e) skip, clear_aux_decl_aux l
/-- `clear_aux_decl` clears all expressions from the local context that represent aux decls. -/
meta def clear_aux_decl : tactic unit :=
local_context >>= clear_aux_decl_aux
/-- `apply_at_aux e et [] h ht` (with `et` the type of `e` and `ht` the type of `h`)
finds a list of expressions `vs` and returns `(e.mk_args (vs ++ [h]), vs)`. -/
meta def apply_at_aux (arg t : expr) : list expr → expr → expr → tactic (expr × list expr)
| vs e (pi n bi d b) :=
do { v ← mk_meta_var d,
apply_at_aux (v :: vs) (e v) (b.instantiate_var v) } <|>
(e arg, vs) <$ unify d t
| vs e _ := failed
/-- `apply_at e h` applies implication `e` on hypothesis `h` and replaces `h` with the result. -/
meta def apply_at (e h : expr) : tactic unit :=
do ht ← infer_type h,
et ← infer_type e,
(h', gs') ← apply_at_aux h ht [] e et,
note h.local_pp_name none h',
clear h,
gs' ← gs'.mfilter is_assigned,
(g :: gs) ← get_goals,
set_goals (g :: gs' ++ gs)
/-- `symmetry_hyp h` applies `symmetry` on hypothesis `h`. -/
meta def symmetry_hyp (h : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit :=
do tgt ← infer_type h,
env ← get_env,
let r := get_app_fn tgt,
match env.symm_for (const_name r) with
| (some symm) := do s ← mk_const symm,
apply_at s h
| none := fail "symmetry tactic failed, target is not a relation application with the expected property."
end
precedence `setup_tactic_parser`:0
/-- `setup_tactic_parser` is a user command that opens the namespaces used in writing
interactive tactics, and declares the local postfix notation `?` for `optional` and `*` for `many`.
It does *not* use the `namespace` command, so it will typically be used after
`namespace tactic.interactive`.
-/
@[user_command]
meta def setup_tactic_parser_cmd (_ : interactive.parse $ tk "setup_tactic_parser") :
lean.parser unit :=
emit_code_here "
open lean
open lean.parser
open interactive interactive.types
local postfix `?`:9001 := optional
local postfix *:9001 := many .
"
/-- `finally tac finalizer` runs `tac` first, then runs `finalizer` even if
`tac` fails. `finally tac finalizer` fails if either `tac` or `finalizer` fails. -/
meta def finally {β} (tac : tactic α) (finalizer : tactic β) : tactic α :=
λ s, match tac s with
| (result.success r s') := (finalizer >> pure r) s'
| (result.exception msg p s') := (finalizer >> result.exception msg p) s'
end
/--
`on_exception handler tac` runs `tac` first, and then runs `handler` only if `tac` failed.
-/
meta def on_exception {β} (handler : tactic β) (tac : tactic α) : tactic α | s :=
match tac s with
| result.exception msg p s' := (handler *> result.exception msg p) s'
| ok := ok
end
/-- `decorate_error add_msg tac` prepends `add_msg` to an exception produced by `tac` -/
meta def decorate_error (add_msg : string) (tac : tactic α) : tactic α | s :=
match tac s with
| result.exception msg p s :=
let msg (_ : unit) : format := match msg with
| some msg := add_msg ++ format.line ++ msg ()
| none := add_msg
end in
result.exception msg p s
| ok := ok
end
/-- Applies tactic `t`. If it succeeds, revert the state, and return the value. If it fails,
returns the error message. -/
meta def retrieve_or_report_error {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic (α ⊕ string) :=
λ s, match t s with
| (interaction_monad.result.success a s') := result.success (sum.inl a) s
| (interaction_monad.result.exception msg' _ s') :=
result.success (sum.inr (msg'.iget ()).to_string) s
end
/-- This tactic succeeds if `t` succeeds or fails with message `msg` such that `p msg` is `tt`.
-/
meta def succeeds_or_fails_with_msg {α : Type} (t : tactic α) (p : string → bool) : tactic unit :=
do x ← retrieve_or_report_error t,
match x with
| (sum.inl _) := skip
| (sum.inr msg) := if p msg then skip else fail msg
end
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "setup_tactic_parser",
category := doc_category.cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.setup_tactic_parser_cmd],
tags := ["parsing", "notation"] }
/-- `trace_error msg t` executes the tactic `t`. If `t` fails, traces `msg` and the failure message
of `t`. -/
meta def trace_error (msg : string) (t : tactic α) : tactic α
| s := match t s with
| (result.success r s') := result.success r s'
| (result.exception (some msg') p s') := (trace msg >> trace (msg' ()) >> result.exception (some msg') p) s'
| (result.exception none p s') := result.exception none p s'
end
/--
``trace_if_enabled `n msg`` traces the message `msg`
only if tracing is enabled for the name `n`.
Create new names registered for tracing with `declare_trace n`.
Then use `set_option trace.n true/false` to enable or disable tracing for `n`.
-/
meta def trace_if_enabled
(n : name) {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] (msg : α) : tactic unit :=
when_tracing n (trace msg)
/--
``trace_state_if_enabled `n msg`` prints the tactic state,
preceded by the optional string `msg`,
only if tracing is enabled for the name `n`.
-/
meta def trace_state_if_enabled
(n : name) (msg : string := "") : tactic unit :=
when_tracing n ((if msg = "" then skip else trace msg) >> trace_state)
/--
This combinator is for testing purposes. It succeeds if `t` fails with message `msg`,
and fails otherwise.
-/
meta def success_if_fail_with_msg {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) (msg : string) : tactic unit :=
λ s, match t s with
| (interaction_monad.result.exception msg' _ s') :=
let expected_msg := (msg'.iget ()).to_string in
if msg = expected_msg then result.success () s
else mk_exception format!"failure messages didn't match. Expected:\n{expected_msg}" none s
| (interaction_monad.result.success a s) :=
mk_exception "success_if_fail_with_msg combinator failed, given tactic succeeded" none s
end
/-- `with_local_goals gs tac` runs `tac` on the goals `gs` and then restores the
initial goals and returns the goals `tac` ended on. -/
meta def with_local_goals {α} (gs : list expr) (tac : tactic α) : tactic (α × list expr) :=
do gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals gs,
finally (prod.mk <$> tac <*> get_goals) (set_goals gs')
/-- like `with_local_goals` but discards the resulting goals -/
meta def with_local_goals' {α} (gs : list expr) (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
prod.fst <$> with_local_goals gs tac
/-- Representation of a proof goal that lends itself to comparison. The
following goal:
```lean
l₀ : T,
l₁ : T
⊢ ∀ v : T, foo
```
is represented as
```
(2, ∀ l₀ l₁ v : T, foo)
```
The number 2 indicates that first the two bound variables of the
`∀` are actually local constant. Comparing two such goals with `=`
rather than `=ₐ` or `is_def_eq` tells us that proof script should
not see the difference between the two.
-/
meta def packaged_goal := ℕ × expr
/-- proof state made of multiple `goal` meant for comparing
the result of running different tactics -/
meta def proof_state := list packaged_goal
meta instance goal.inhabited : inhabited packaged_goal := ⟨(0,var 0)⟩
meta instance proof_state.inhabited : inhabited proof_state :=
(infer_instance : inhabited (list packaged_goal))
/-- create a `packaged_goal` corresponding to the current goal -/
meta def get_packaged_goal : tactic packaged_goal := do
ls ← local_context,
tgt ← target >>= instantiate_mvars,
tgt ← pis ls tgt,
pure (ls.length, tgt)
/-- `goal_of_mvar g`, with `g` a meta variable, creates a
`packaged_goal` corresponding to `g` interpretted as a proof goal -/
meta def goal_of_mvar (g : expr) : tactic packaged_goal :=
with_local_goals' [g] get_packaged_goal
/-- `get_proof_state` lists the user visible goal for each goal
of the current state and for each goal, abstracts all of the
meta variables of the other gaols.
This produces a list of goals in the form of `ℕ × expr` where
the `expr` encodes the following proof state:
```lean
2 goals
l₁ : t₁,
l₂ : t₂,
l₃ : t₃
⊢ tgt₁
⊢ tgt₂
```
as
```lean
[ (3, ∀ (mv : tgt₁) (mv : tgt₂) (l₁ : t₁) (l₂ : t₂) (l₃ : t₃), tgt₁),
(0, ∀ (mv : tgt₁) (mv : tgt₂), tgt₂) ]
```
with 2 goals, the first 2 bound variables encode the meta variable
of all the goals, the next 3 (in the first goal) and 0 (in the second goal)
are the local constants.
This representation allows us to compare goals and proof states while
ignoring information like the unique name of local constants and
the equality or difference of meta variables that encode the same goal.
-/
meta def get_proof_state : tactic proof_state :=
do gs ← get_goals,
gs.mmap $ λ g, do
⟨n,g⟩ ← goal_of_mvar g,
g ← gs.mfoldl (λ g v, do
g ← kabstract g v reducible ff,
pure $ pi `goal binder_info.default `(true) g ) g,
pure (n,g)
/--
Run `tac` in a disposable proof state and return the state.
See `proof_state`, `goal` and `get_proof_state`.
-/
meta def get_proof_state_after (tac : tactic unit) : tactic (option proof_state) :=
try_core $ retrieve $ tac >> get_proof_state
open lean interactive
/-- A type alias for `tactic format`, standing for "pretty print format". -/
meta def pformat := tactic format
/-- `mk` lifts `fmt : format` to the tactic monad (`pformat`). -/
meta def pformat.mk (fmt : format) : pformat := pure fmt
/-- an alias for `pp`. -/
meta def to_pfmt {α} [has_to_tactic_format α] (x : α) : pformat :=
pp x
meta instance pformat.has_to_tactic_format : has_to_tactic_format pformat :=
⟨ id ⟩
meta instance : has_append pformat :=
⟨ λ x y, (++) <$> x <*> y ⟩
meta instance tactic.has_to_tactic_format [has_to_tactic_format α] :
has_to_tactic_format (tactic α) :=
⟨ λ x, x >>= to_pfmt ⟩
private meta def parse_pformat : string → list char → parser pexpr
| acc [] := pure ``(to_pfmt %%(reflect acc))
| acc ('\n'::s) :=
do f ← parse_pformat "" s,
pure ``(to_pfmt %%(reflect acc) ++ pformat.mk format.line ++ %%f)
| acc ('{'::'{'::s) := parse_pformat (acc ++ "{") s
| acc ('{'::s) :=
do (e, s) ← with_input (lean.parser.pexpr 0) s.as_string,
'}'::s ← return s.to_list | fail "'}' expected",
f ← parse_pformat "" s,
pure ``(to_pfmt %%(reflect acc) ++ to_pfmt %%e ++ %%f)
| acc (c::s) := parse_pformat (acc.str c) s
reserve prefix `pformat! `:100
/-- See `format!` in `init/meta/interactive_base.lean`.
The main differences are that `pp` is called instead of `to_fmt` and that we can use
arguments of type `tactic α` in the quotations.
Now, consider the following:
```lean
e ← to_expr ``(3 + 7),
trace format!"{e}" -- outputs `has_add.add.{0} nat nat.has_add (bit1.{0} nat nat.has_one nat.has_add (has_one.one.{0} nat nat.has_one)) ...`
trace pformat!"{e}" -- outputs `3 + 7`
```
The difference is significant. And now, the following is expressible:
```lean
e ← to_expr ``(3 + 7),
trace pformat!"{e} : {infer_type e}" -- outputs `3 + 7 : ℕ`
```
See also: `trace!` and `fail!`
-/
@[user_notation]
meta def pformat_macro (_ : parse $ tk "pformat!") (s : string) : parser pexpr :=
do e ← parse_pformat "" s.to_list,
return ``(%%e : pformat)
reserve prefix `fail! `:100
/--
The combination of `pformat` and `fail`.
-/
@[user_notation]
meta def fail_macro (_ : parse $ tk "fail!") (s : string) : parser pexpr :=
do e ← pformat_macro () s,
pure ``((%%e : pformat) >>= fail)
reserve prefix `trace! `:100
/--
The combination of `pformat` and `trace`.
-/
@[user_notation]
meta def trace_macro (_ : parse $ tk "trace!") (s : string) : parser pexpr :=
do e ← pformat_macro () s,
pure ``((%%e : pformat) >>= trace)
/-- A hackish way to get the `src` directory of mathlib. -/
meta def get_mathlib_dir : tactic string :=
do e ← get_env,
s ← e.decl_olean `tactic.reset_instance_cache,
return $ s.popn_back 17
/-- Checks whether a declaration with the given name is declared in mathlib.
If you want to run this tactic many times, you should use `environment.is_prefix_of_file` instead,
since it is expensive to execute `get_mathlib_dir` many times. -/
meta def is_in_mathlib (n : name) : tactic bool :=
do ml ← get_mathlib_dir, e ← get_env, return $ e.is_prefix_of_file ml n
/--
Runs a tactic by name.
If it is a `tactic string`, return whatever string it returns.
If it is a `tactic unit`, return the name.
(This is mostly used in invoking "self-reporting tactics", e.g. by `tidy` and `hint`.)
-/
meta def name_to_tactic (n : name) : tactic string :=
do d ← get_decl n,
e ← mk_const n,
let t := d.type,
if (t =ₐ `(tactic unit)) then
(eval_expr (tactic unit) e) >>= (λ t, t >> (name.to_string <$> strip_prefix n))
else if (t =ₐ `(tactic string)) then
(eval_expr (tactic string) e) >>= (λ t, t)
else fail!"name_to_tactic cannot take `{n} as input: its type must be `tactic string` or `tactic unit`"
/-- auxiliary function for `apply_under_n_pis` -/
private meta def apply_under_n_pis_aux (func arg : pexpr) : ℕ → ℕ → expr → pexpr
| n 0 _ :=
let vars := ((list.range n).reverse.map (@expr.var ff)),
bd := vars.foldl expr.app arg.mk_explicit in
func bd
| n (k+1) (expr.pi nm bi tp bd) := expr.pi nm bi (pexpr.of_expr tp) (apply_under_n_pis_aux (n+1) k bd)
| n (k+1) t := apply_under_n_pis_aux n 0 t
/--
Assumes `pi_expr` is of the form `Π x1 ... xn xn+1..., _`.
Creates a pexpr of the form `Π x1 ... xn, func (arg x1 ... xn)`.
All arguments (implicit and explicit) to `arg` should be supplied. -/
meta def apply_under_n_pis (func arg : pexpr) (pi_expr : expr) (n : ℕ) : pexpr :=
apply_under_n_pis_aux func arg 0 n pi_expr
/--
Assumes `pi_expr` is of the form `Π x1 ... xn, _`.
Creates a pexpr of the form `Π x1 ... xn, func (arg x1 ... xn)`.
All arguments (implicit and explicit) to `arg` should be supplied. -/
meta def apply_under_pis (func arg : pexpr) (pi_expr : expr) : pexpr :=
apply_under_n_pis func arg pi_expr pi_expr.pi_arity
/--
If `func` is a `pexpr` representing a function that takes an argument `a`,
`get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt func tgt` returns the arity of `a`.
When `tgt` is a `pi` expr, `func` is elaborated in a context
with the domain of `tgt`.
Examples:
* ```get_pexpr_arg_arity ``(ring) `(true)``` returns 0, since `ring` takes one non-function argument.
* ```get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt ``(monad) `(true)``` returns 1, since `monad` takes one argument of type `α → α`.
* ```get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt ``(module R) `(Π (R : Type), comm_ring R → true)``` returns 0
-/
private meta def get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt (func : pexpr) (tgt : expr) : tactic ℕ :=
lock_tactic_state $ do
mv ← mk_mvar,
solve_aux tgt $ intros >> to_expr ``(%%func %%mv),
expr.pi_arity <$> (infer_type mv >>= instantiate_mvars)
/--
Tries to derive instances by unfolding the newly introduced type and applying type class resolution.
For example,
```lean
@[derive ring] def new_int : Type := ℤ
```
adds an instance `ring new_int`, defined to be the instance of `ring ℤ` found by `apply_instance`.
Multiple instances can be added with `@[derive [ring, module ℝ]]`.
This derive handler applies only to declarations made using `def`, and will fail on such a
declaration if it is unable to derive an instance. It is run with higher priority than the built-in
handlers, which will fail on `def`s.
-/
@[derive_handler, priority 2000] meta def delta_instance : derive_handler :=
λ cls new_decl_name,
do env ← get_env,
if env.is_inductive new_decl_name then return ff else
do new_decl ← get_decl new_decl_name,
new_decl_pexpr ← resolve_name new_decl_name,
arity ← get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt cls new_decl.type,
tgt ← to_expr $ apply_under_n_pis cls new_decl_pexpr new_decl.type (new_decl.type.pi_arity - arity),
(_, inst) ← solve_aux tgt
(intros >> reset_instance_cache >> delta_target [new_decl_name] >> apply_instance >> done),
inst ← instantiate_mvars inst,
inst ← replace_univ_metas_with_univ_params inst,
tgt ← instantiate_mvars tgt,
nm ← get_unused_decl_name $ new_decl_name <.>
match cls with
| (expr.const nm _) := nm.last
| _ := "inst"
end,
add_protected_decl $ declaration.defn nm inst.collect_univ_params tgt inst new_decl.reducibility_hints new_decl.is_trusted,
set_basic_attribute `instance nm tt,
return tt
/-- `find_private_decl n none` finds a private declaration named `n` in any of the imported files.
`find_private_decl n (some m)` finds a private declaration named `n` in the same file where a
declaration named `m` can be found. -/
meta def find_private_decl (n : name) (fr : option name) : tactic name :=
do env ← get_env,
fn ← option_t.run (do
fr ← option_t.mk (return fr),
d ← monad_lift $ get_decl fr,
option_t.mk (return $ env.decl_olean d.to_name) ),
let p : string → bool :=
match fn with
| (some fn) := λ x, fn = x
| none := λ _, tt
end,
let xs := env.decl_filter_map (λ d,
do fn ← env.decl_olean d.to_name,
guard ((`_private).is_prefix_of d.to_name ∧ p fn ∧ d.to_name.update_prefix name.anonymous = n),
pure d.to_name),
match xs with
| [n] := pure n
| [] := fail "no such private found"
| _ := fail "many matches found"
end
open lean.parser interactive
/-- `import_private foo from bar` finds a private declaration `foo` in the same file as `bar`
and creates a local notation to refer to it.
`import_private foo` looks for `foo` in all imported files.
When possible, make `foo` non-private rather than using this feature.
-/
@[user_command]
meta def import_private_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "import_private") : lean.parser unit :=
do n ← ident,
fr ← optional (tk "from" *> ident),
n ← find_private_decl n fr,
c ← resolve_constant n,
d ← get_decl n,
let c := @expr.const tt c d.univ_levels,
new_n ← new_aux_decl_name,
add_decl $ declaration.defn new_n d.univ_params d.type c reducibility_hints.abbrev d.is_trusted,
let new_not := sformat!"local notation `{n.update_prefix name.anonymous}` := {new_n}",
emit_command_here $ new_not,
skip .
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "import_private",
category := doc_category.cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.import_private_cmd],
tags := ["renaming"] }
/--
The command `mk_simp_attribute simp_name "description"` creates a simp set with name `simp_name`.
Lemmas tagged with `@[simp_name]` will be included when `simp with simp_name` is called.
`mk_simp_attribute simp_name none` will use a default description.
Appending the command with `with attr1 attr2 ...` will include all declarations tagged with
`attr1`, `attr2`, ... in the new simp set.
This command is preferred to using ``run_cmd mk_simp_attr `simp_name`` since it adds a doc string
to the attribute that is defined. If you need to create a simp set in a file where this command is
not available, you should use
```lean
run_cmd mk_simp_attr `simp_name
run_cmd add_doc_string `simp_attr.simp_name "Description of the simp set here"
```
-/
@[user_command]
meta def mk_simp_attribute_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "mk_simp_attribute") : lean.parser unit :=
do n ← ident,
d ← parser.pexpr,
d ← to_expr ``(%%d : option string),
descr ← eval_expr (option string) d,
with_list ← types.with_ident_list <|> return [],
mk_simp_attr n with_list,
add_doc_string (name.append `simp_attr n) $ descr.get_or_else $ "simp set for " ++ to_string n
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "mk_simp_attribute",
category := doc_category.cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.mk_simp_attribute_cmd],
tags := ["simplification"] }
end tactic
/--
`find_defeq red m e` looks for a key in `m` that is defeq to `e` (up to transparency `red`),
and returns the value associated with this key if it exists.
Otherwise, it fails.
-/
meta def list.find_defeq (red : tactic.transparency) {v} (m : list (expr × v)) (e : expr) :
tactic (expr × v) :=
m.mfind $ λ ⟨e', val⟩, tactic.is_def_eq e e' red
|
6cf9e3d11f87e6a22088e90abce52fba2040c660 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/linear_algebra/sesquilinear_form.lean | 20cb2a6284ad0e8d601dd7af17431c6a656a2051 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,855 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Andreas Swerdlow
-/
import ring_theory.ring_invo
import algebra.module.linear_map
/-!
# Sesquilinear form
This file defines a sesquilinear form over a module. The definition requires a ring antiautomorphism
on the scalar ring. Basic ideas such as
orthogonality are also introduced.
A sesquilinear form on an `R`-module `M`, is a function from `M × M` to `R`, that is linear in the
first argument and antilinear in the second, with respect to an antiautomorphism on `R` (an
antiisomorphism from `R` to `R`).
## Notations
Given any term `S` of type `sesq_form`, due to a coercion, can use the notation `S x y` to
refer to the function field, ie. `S x y = S.sesq x y`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sesquilinear_form#Over_arbitrary_rings>
## Tags
Sesquilinear form,
-/
open_locale big_operators
universes u v w
/-- A sesquilinear form over a module -/
structure sesq_form (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [ring R] (I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ)
[add_comm_group M] [module R M] :=
(sesq : M → M → R)
(sesq_add_left : ∀ (x y z : M), sesq (x + y) z = sesq x z + sesq y z)
(sesq_smul_left : ∀ (a : R) (x y : M), sesq (a • x) y = a * (sesq x y))
(sesq_add_right : ∀ (x y z : M), sesq x (y + z) = sesq x y + sesq x z)
(sesq_smul_right : ∀ (a : R) (x y : M), sesq x (a • y) = (I a).unop * (sesq x y))
namespace sesq_form
section general_ring
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {S : sesq_form R M I}
instance : has_coe_to_fun (sesq_form R M I) :=
⟨_, λ S, S.sesq⟩
lemma add_left (x y z : M) : S (x + y) z = S x z + S y z := sesq_add_left S x y z
lemma smul_left (a : R) (x y : M) : S (a • x) y = a * (S x y) := sesq_smul_left S a x y
lemma add_right (x y z : M) : S x (y + z) = S x y + S x z := sesq_add_right S x y z
lemma smul_right (a : R) (x y : M) : S x (a • y) = (I a).unop * (S x y) := sesq_smul_right S a x y
lemma zero_left (x : M) : S 0 x = 0 :=
by { rw [←zero_smul R (0 : M), smul_left, zero_mul] }
lemma zero_right (x : M) : S x 0 = 0 :=
by { rw [←zero_smul R (0 : M), smul_right], simp }
lemma neg_left (x y : M) : S (-x) y = -(S x y) :=
by { rw [←@neg_one_smul R _ _, smul_left, neg_one_mul] }
lemma neg_right (x y : M) : S x (-y) = -(S x y) :=
by { rw [←@neg_one_smul R _ _, smul_right], simp }
lemma sub_left (x y z : M) :
S (x - y) z = S x z - S y z :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_left, neg_left]
lemma sub_right (x y z : M) :
S x (y - z) = S x y - S x z :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_right, neg_right]
variable {D : sesq_form R M I}
@[ext] lemma ext (H : ∀ (x y : M), S x y = D x y) : S = D :=
by {cases S, cases D, congr, funext, exact H _ _}
instance : add_comm_group (sesq_form R M I) :=
{ add := λ S D, { sesq := λ x y, S x y + D x y,
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, by {rw add_left, rw add_left, ac_refl},
sesq_smul_left := λ a x y, by {rw [smul_left, smul_left, mul_add]},
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, by {rw add_right, rw add_right, ac_refl},
sesq_smul_right := λ a x y, by {rw [smul_right, smul_right, mul_add]} },
add_assoc := by {intros, ext,
unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw add_assoc},
zero := { sesq := λ x y, 0,
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, (add_zero 0).symm,
sesq_smul_left := λ a x y, (mul_zero a).symm,
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, (zero_add 0).symm,
sesq_smul_right := λ a x y, (mul_zero (I a).unop).symm },
zero_add := by {intros, ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw zero_add},
add_zero := by {intros, ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw add_zero},
neg := λ S, { sesq := λ x y, - (S.1 x y),
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, by rw [sesq_add_left, neg_add],
sesq_smul_left := λ a x y, by rw [sesq_smul_left, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm],
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, by rw [sesq_add_right, neg_add],
sesq_smul_right := λ a x y, by rw [sesq_smul_right, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm] },
add_left_neg := by {intros, ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw neg_add_self},
add_comm := by {intros, ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw add_comm} }
instance : inhabited (sesq_form R M I) := ⟨0⟩
/-- The proposition that two elements of a sesquilinear form space are orthogonal -/
def is_ortho (S : sesq_form R M I) (x y : M) : Prop :=
S x y = 0
lemma ortho_zero (x : M) :
is_ortho S (0 : M) x := zero_left x
lemma is_add_monoid_hom_left (S : sesq_form R M I) (x : M) : is_add_monoid_hom (λ z, S z x) :=
{ map_add := λ z y, sesq_add_left S _ _ _,
map_zero := zero_left x }
lemma is_add_monoid_hom_right (S : sesq_form R M I) (x : M) : is_add_monoid_hom (λ z, S x z) :=
{ map_add := λ z y, sesq_add_right S _ _ _,
map_zero := zero_right x }
lemma map_sum_left {α : Type*} (S : sesq_form R M I) (t : finset α) (g : α → M) (w : M) :
S (∑ i in t, g i) w = ∑ i in t, S (g i) w :=
by haveI s_inst := is_add_monoid_hom_left S w; exact (finset.sum_hom t (λ z, S z w)).symm
lemma map_sum_right {α : Type*} (S : sesq_form R M I) (t : finset α) (g : α → M) (w : M) :
S w (∑ i in t, g i) = ∑ i in t, S w (g i) :=
by haveI s_inst := is_add_monoid_hom_right S w; exact (finset.sum_hom t (λ z, S w z)).symm
variables {M₂ : Type w} [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂]
/-- Apply the linear maps `f` and `g` to the left and right arguments of the sesquilinear form. -/
def comp (S : sesq_form R M I) (f g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) : sesq_form R M₂ I :=
{ sesq := λ x y, S (f x) (g y),
sesq_add_left := by simp [add_left],
sesq_smul_left := by simp [smul_left],
sesq_add_right := by simp [add_right],
sesq_smul_right := by simp [smul_right] }
/-- Apply the linear map `f` to the left argument of the sesquilinear form. -/
def comp_left (S : sesq_form R M I) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : sesq_form R M I :=
S.comp f linear_map.id
/-- Apply the linear map `f` to the right argument of the sesquilinear form. -/
def comp_right (S : sesq_form R M I) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : sesq_form R M I :=
S.comp linear_map.id f
lemma comp_left_comp_right (S : sesq_form R M I) (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) :
(S.comp_left f).comp_right g = S.comp f g := rfl
lemma comp_right_comp_left (S : sesq_form R M I) (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) :
(S.comp_right g).comp_left f = S.comp f g := rfl
lemma comp_comp {M₃ : Type*} [add_comm_group M₃] [module R M₃]
(S : sesq_form R M₃ I) (l r : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (l' r' : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(S.comp l' r').comp l r = S.comp (l'.comp l) (r'.comp r) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (S : sesq_form R M₂ I) (l r : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (v w : M) :
S.comp l r v w = S (l v) (r w) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_left_apply (S : sesq_form R M I) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (v w : M) :
S.comp_left f v w = S (f v) w := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_right_apply (S : sesq_form R M I) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (v w : M) :
S.comp_right f v w = S v (f w) := rfl
/-- Let `l`, `r` be surjective linear maps, then two sesquilinear forms are equal if and only if
the sesquilinear forms resulting from composition with `l` and `r` are equal. -/
lemma comp_injective (S₁ S₂ : sesq_form R M₂ I) {l r : M →ₗ[R] M₂}
(hl : function.surjective l) (hr : function.surjective r) :
S₁.comp l r = S₂.comp l r ↔ S₁ = S₂ :=
begin
split; intros h,
{ ext,
rcases hl x with ⟨x', rfl⟩,
rcases hr y with ⟨y', rfl⟩,
rw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, h], },
{ rw h },
end
end general_ring
section comm_ring
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{J : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} (F : sesq_form R M J) (f : M → M)
instance to_module : module R (sesq_form R M J) :=
{ smul := λ c S,
{ sesq := λ x y, c * S x y,
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, by {unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq,
rw [sesq_add_left, left_distrib]},
sesq_smul_left := λ a x y, by {unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq,
rw [sesq_smul_left, ←mul_assoc, mul_comm c, mul_assoc]},
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, by {unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq,
rw [sesq_add_right, left_distrib]},
sesq_smul_right := λ a x y, by {unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq,
rw [sesq_smul_right, ←mul_assoc, mul_comm c, mul_assoc], refl} },
smul_add := λ c S D, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw left_distrib},
add_smul := λ c S D, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw right_distrib},
mul_smul := λ a c D, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw mul_assoc},
one_smul := λ S, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw one_mul},
zero_smul := λ S, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw zero_mul},
smul_zero := λ S, by {ext, unfold coe_fn has_coe_to_fun.coe sesq, rw mul_zero} }
end comm_ring
section domain
variables {R : Type*} [domain R]
{M : Type v} [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{K : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {G : sesq_form R M K}
theorem ortho_smul_left {x y : M} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(is_ortho G x y) ↔ (is_ortho G (a • x) y) :=
begin
dunfold is_ortho,
split; intro H,
{ rw [smul_left, H, mul_zero] },
{ rw [smul_left, mul_eq_zero] at H,
cases H,
{ trivial },
{ exact H }}
end
theorem ortho_smul_right {x y : M} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(is_ortho G x y) ↔ (is_ortho G x (a • y)) :=
begin
dunfold is_ortho,
split; intro H,
{ rw [smul_right, H, mul_zero] },
{ rw [smul_right, mul_eq_zero] at H,
cases H,
{ exfalso,
-- `map_eq_zero_iff` doesn't fire here even if marked as a simp lemma, probably bcecause
-- different instance paths
simp only [opposite.unop_eq_zero_iff] at H,
exact ha (K.map_eq_zero_iff.mp H), },
{ exact H }}
end
end domain
end sesq_form
namespace refl_sesq_form
open refl_sesq_form sesq_form
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {S : sesq_form R M I}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is reflexive -/
def is_refl (S : sesq_form R M I) : Prop := ∀ (x y : M), S x y = 0 → S y x = 0
variable (H : is_refl S)
lemma eq_zero : ∀ {x y : M}, S x y = 0 → S y x = 0 := λ x y, H x y
lemma ortho_sym {x y : M} :
is_ortho S x y ↔ is_ortho S y x := ⟨eq_zero H, eq_zero H⟩
end refl_sesq_form
namespace sym_sesq_form
open sym_sesq_form sesq_form
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {S : sesq_form R M I}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is symmetric -/
def is_sym (S : sesq_form R M I) : Prop := ∀ (x y : M), (I (S x y)).unop = S y x
variable (H : is_sym S)
include H
lemma sym (x y : M) : (I (S x y)).unop = S y x := H x y
lemma is_refl : refl_sesq_form.is_refl S := λ x y H1, by { rw [←H], simp [H1], }
lemma ortho_sym {x y : M} :
is_ortho S x y ↔ is_ortho S y x := refl_sesq_form.ortho_sym (is_refl H)
end sym_sesq_form
namespace alt_sesq_form
open alt_sesq_form sesq_form
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {I : R ≃+* Rᵒᵖ} {S : sesq_form R M I}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is alternating -/
def is_alt (S : sesq_form R M I) : Prop := ∀ (x : M), S x x = 0
variable (H : is_alt S)
include H
lemma self_eq_zero (x : M) : S x x = 0 := H x
lemma neg (x y : M) :
- S x y = S y x :=
begin
have H1 : S (x + y) (x + y) = 0,
{ exact self_eq_zero H (x + y) },
rw [add_left, add_right, add_right,
self_eq_zero H, self_eq_zero H, ring.zero_add,
ring.add_zero, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at H1,
exact H1,
end
end alt_sesq_form
|
b36685ede0635170049dd975435a11e3bdfa5083 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/category_theory/opposites.lean | 3c74941c690e7fa30a973541546dea0baec6a790 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,261 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.equivalence
/-!
# Opposite categories
We provide a category instance on `Cᵒᵖ`.
The morphisms `X ⟶ Y` are defined to be the morphisms `unop Y ⟶ unop X` in `C`.
Here `Cᵒᵖ` is an irreducible typeclass synonym for `C`
(it is the same one used in the algebra library).
We also provide various mechanisms for constructing opposite morphisms, functors,
and natural transformations.
Unfortunately, because we do not have a definitional equality `op (op X) = X`,
there are quite a few variations that are needed in practice.
-/
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂ -- morphism levels before object levels. See note [category_theory universes].
open opposite
variables {C : Type u₁}
section quiver
variables [quiver.{v₁} C]
lemma quiver.hom.op_inj {X Y : C} :
function.injective (quiver.hom.op : (X ⟶ Y) → (op Y ⟶ op X)) :=
λ _ _ H, congr_arg quiver.hom.unop H
lemma quiver.hom.unop_inj {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} :
function.injective (quiver.hom.unop : (X ⟶ Y) → (unop Y ⟶ unop X)) :=
λ _ _ H, congr_arg quiver.hom.op H
@[simp] lemma quiver.hom.unop_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f.op.unop = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma quiver.hom.op_unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f.unop.op = f := rfl
end quiver
namespace category_theory
variables [category.{v₁} C]
/--
The opposite category.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001M>.
-/
instance category.opposite : category.{v₁} Cᵒᵖ :=
{ comp := λ _ _ _ f g, (g.unop ≫ f.unop).op,
id := λ X, (𝟙 (unop X)).op }
@[simp] lemma op_comp {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} :
(f ≫ g).op = g.op ≫ f.op := rfl
@[simp] lemma op_id {X : C} : (𝟙 X).op = 𝟙 (op X) := rfl
@[simp] lemma unop_comp {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} :
(f ≫ g).unop = g.unop ≫ f.unop := rfl
@[simp] lemma unop_id {X : Cᵒᵖ} : (𝟙 X).unop = 𝟙 (unop X) := rfl
@[simp] lemma unop_id_op {X : C} : (𝟙 (op X)).unop = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[simp] lemma op_id_unop {X : Cᵒᵖ} : (𝟙 (unop X)).op = 𝟙 X := rfl
section
variables (C)
/-- The functor from the double-opposite of a category to the underlying category. -/
@[simps]
def op_op : (Cᵒᵖ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ X, unop (unop X),
map := λ X Y f, f.unop.unop }
/-- The functor from a category to its double-opposite. -/
@[simps]
def unop_unop : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ :=
{ obj := λ X, op (op X),
map := λ X Y f, f.op.op }
/-- The double opposite category is equivalent to the original. -/
@[simps]
def op_op_equivalence : Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ ≌ C :=
{ functor := op_op C,
inverse := unop_unop C,
unit_iso := iso.refl (𝟭 Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ),
counit_iso := iso.refl (unop_unop C ⋙ op_op C) }
end
/-- If `f` is an isomorphism, so is `f.op` -/
instance is_iso_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : is_iso f.op :=
⟨⟨(inv f).op,
⟨quiver.hom.unop_inj (by tidy), quiver.hom.unop_inj (by tidy)⟩⟩⟩
/--
If `f.op` is an isomorphism `f` must be too.
(This cannot be an instance as it would immediately loop!)
-/
lemma is_iso_of_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f.op] : is_iso f :=
⟨⟨(inv (f.op)).unop,
⟨quiver.hom.op_inj (by simp), quiver.hom.op_inj (by simp)⟩⟩⟩
lemma is_iso_op_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : is_iso f.op ↔ is_iso f :=
⟨λ hf, by exactI is_iso_of_op _, λ hf, by exactI infer_instance⟩
lemma is_iso_unop_iff {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : is_iso f.unop ↔ is_iso f :=
by rw [← is_iso_op_iff f.unop, quiver.hom.op_unop]
instance is_iso_unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : is_iso f.unop :=
(is_iso_unop_iff _).2 infer_instance
@[simp] lemma op_inv {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : (inv f).op = inv f.op :=
by { ext, rw [← op_comp, is_iso.inv_hom_id, op_id] }
@[simp] lemma unop_inv {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : (inv f).unop = inv f.unop :=
by { ext, rw [← unop_comp, is_iso.inv_hom_id, unop_id] }
namespace functor
section
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
variables {C D}
/--
The opposite of a functor, i.e. considering a functor `F : C ⥤ D` as a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made between these.
-/
@[simps]
protected def op (F : C ⥤ D) : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ :=
{ obj := λ X, op (F.obj (unop X)),
map := λ X Y f, (F.map f.unop).op }
/--
Given a functor `F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ` we can take the "unopposite" functor `F : C ⥤ D`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made between these.
-/
@[simps]
protected def unop (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : C ⥤ D :=
{ obj := λ X, unop (F.obj (op X)),
map := λ X Y f, (F.map f.op).unop }
/-- The isomorphism between `F.op.unop` and `F`. -/
@[simps] def op_unop_iso (F : C ⥤ D) : F.op.unop ≅ F :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl _) (by tidy)
/-- The isomorphism between `F.unop.op` and `F`. -/
@[simps] def unop_op_iso (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : F.unop.op ≅ F :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl _) (by tidy)
variables (C D)
/--
Taking the opposite of a functor is functorial.
-/
@[simps]
def op_hom : (C ⥤ D)ᵒᵖ ⥤ (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) :=
{ obj := λ F, (unop F).op,
map := λ F G α,
{ app := λ X, (α.unop.app (unop X)).op,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.unop_inj (α.unop.naturality f.unop).symm } }
/--
Take the "unopposite" of a functor is functorial.
-/
@[simps]
def op_inv : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) ⥤ (C ⥤ D)ᵒᵖ :=
{ obj := λ F, op F.unop,
map := λ F G α, quiver.hom.op
{ app := λ X, (α.app (op X)).unop,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.op_inj $ (α.naturality f.op).symm } }
variables {C D}
/--
Another variant of the opposite of functor, turning a functor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ` into a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made.
-/
@[simps]
protected def left_op (F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D :=
{ obj := λ X, unop (F.obj (unop X)),
map := λ X Y f, (F.map f.unop).unop }
/--
Another variant of the opposite of functor, turning a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D` into a functor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made.
-/
@[simps]
protected def right_op (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ :=
{ obj := λ X, op (F.obj (op X)),
map := λ X Y f, (F.map f.op).op }
instance {F : C ⥤ D} [full F] : full F.op :=
{ preimage := λ X Y f, (F.preimage f.unop).op }
instance {F : C ⥤ D} [faithful F] : faithful F.op :=
{ map_injective' := λ X Y f g h,
quiver.hom.unop_inj $ by simpa using map_injective F (quiver.hom.op_inj h) }
/-- If F is faithful then the right_op of F is also faithful. -/
instance right_op_faithful {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} [faithful F] : faithful F.right_op :=
{ map_injective' := λ X Y f g h, quiver.hom.op_inj (map_injective F (quiver.hom.op_inj h)) }
/-- If F is faithful then the left_op of F is also faithful. -/
instance left_op_faithful {F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} [faithful F] : faithful F.left_op :=
{ map_injective' := λ X Y f g h, quiver.hom.unop_inj (map_injective F (quiver.hom.unop_inj h)) }
/-- The isomorphism between `F.left_op.right_op` and `F`. -/
@[simps]
def left_op_right_op_iso (F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : F.left_op.right_op ≅ F :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl _) (by tidy)
/-- The isomorphism between `F.right_op.left_op` and `F`. -/
@[simps]
def right_op_left_op_iso (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : F.right_op.left_op ≅ F :=
nat_iso.of_components (λ X, iso.refl _) (by tidy)
end
end functor
namespace nat_trans
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
section
variables {F G : C ⥤ D}
/-- The opposite of a natural transformation. -/
@[simps] protected def op (α : F ⟶ G) : G.op ⟶ F.op :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app (unop X)).op,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.unop_inj (by simp) }
@[simp] lemma op_id (F : C ⥤ D) : nat_trans.op (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 (F.op) := rfl
/-- The "unopposite" of a natural transformation. -/
@[simps] protected def unop {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (α : F ⟶ G) : G.unop ⟶ F.unop :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app (op X)).unop,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.op_inj (by simp) }
@[simp] lemma unop_id (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : nat_trans.unop (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 (F.unop) := rfl
/--
Given a natural transformation `α : F.op ⟶ G.op`,
we can take the "unopposite" of each component obtaining a natural transformation `G ⟶ F`.
-/
@[simps] protected def remove_op (α : F.op ⟶ G.op) : G ⟶ F :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app (op X)).unop,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.op_inj $
by simpa only [functor.op_map] using (α.naturality f.op).symm }
@[simp] lemma remove_op_id (F : C ⥤ D) : nat_trans.remove_op (𝟙 F.op) = 𝟙 F := rfl
/-- Given a natural transformation `α : F.unop ⟶ G.unop`, we can take the opposite of each
component obtaining a natural transformation `G ⟶ F`. -/
@[simps] protected def remove_unop {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (α : F.unop ⟶ G.unop) : G ⟶ F :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app (unop X)).op,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.unop_inj $
by simpa only [functor.unop_map] using (α.naturality f.unop).symm }
@[simp] lemma remove_unop_id (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : nat_trans.remove_unop (𝟙 F.unop) = 𝟙 F := rfl
end
section
variables {F G H : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ}
/--
Given a natural transformation `α : F ⟶ G`, for `F G : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`,
taking `unop` of each component gives a natural transformation `G.left_op ⟶ F.left_op`.
-/
@[simps] protected def left_op (α : F ⟶ G) : G.left_op ⟶ F.left_op :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app (unop X)).unop,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.op_inj (by simp) }
@[simp] lemma left_op_id : (𝟙 F : F ⟶ F).left_op = 𝟙 F.left_op := rfl
@[simp] lemma left_op_comp (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) :
(α ≫ β).left_op = β.left_op ≫ α.left_op := rfl
/--
Given a natural transformation `α : F.left_op ⟶ G.left_op`, for `F G : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`,
taking `op` of each component gives a natural transformation `G ⟶ F`.
-/
@[simps] protected def remove_left_op (α : F.left_op ⟶ G.left_op) : G ⟶ F :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app (op X)).op,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.unop_inj $
by simpa only [functor.left_op_map] using (α.naturality f.op).symm }
@[simp] lemma remove_left_op_id : nat_trans.remove_left_op (𝟙 F.left_op) = 𝟙 F := rfl
end
section
variables {F G H : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D}
/--
Given a natural transformation `α : F ⟶ G`, for `F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`,
taking `op` of each component gives a natural transformation `G.right_op ⟶ F.right_op`.
-/
@[simps] protected def right_op (α : F ⟶ G) : G.right_op ⟶ F.right_op :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app _).op,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.unop_inj (by simp) }
@[simp] lemma right_op_id : (𝟙 F : F ⟶ F).right_op = 𝟙 F.right_op := rfl
@[simp] lemma right_op_comp (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) :
(α ≫ β).right_op = β.right_op ≫ α.right_op := rfl
/--
Given a natural transformation `α : F.right_op ⟶ G.right_op`, for `F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`,
taking `unop` of each component gives a natural transformation `G ⟶ F`.
-/
@[simps] protected def remove_right_op (α : F.right_op ⟶ G.right_op) : G ⟶ F :=
{ app := λ X, (α.app X.unop).unop,
naturality' := λ X Y f, quiver.hom.op_inj $
by simpa only [functor.right_op_map] using (α.naturality f.unop).symm }
@[simp] lemma remove_right_op_id : nat_trans.remove_right_op (𝟙 F.right_op) = 𝟙 F := rfl
end
end nat_trans
namespace iso
variables {X Y : C}
/--
The opposite isomorphism.
-/
@[simps]
protected def op (α : X ≅ Y) : op Y ≅ op X :=
{ hom := α.hom.op,
inv := α.inv.op,
hom_inv_id' := quiver.hom.unop_inj α.inv_hom_id,
inv_hom_id' := quiver.hom.unop_inj α.hom_inv_id }
/-- The isomorphism obtained from an isomorphism in the opposite category. -/
@[simps] def unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ≅ Y) : Y.unop ≅ X.unop :=
{ hom := f.hom.unop,
inv := f.inv.unop,
hom_inv_id' := by simp only [← unop_comp, f.inv_hom_id, unop_id],
inv_hom_id' := by simp only [← unop_comp, f.hom_inv_id, unop_id] }
@[simp] lemma unop_op {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ≅ Y) : f.unop.op = f :=
by ext; refl
@[simp] lemma op_unop {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) : f.op.unop = f :=
by ext; refl
end iso
namespace nat_iso
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
variables {F G : C ⥤ D}
/-- The natural isomorphism between opposite functors `G.op ≅ F.op` induced by a natural
isomorphism between the original functors `F ≅ G`. -/
@[simps] protected def op (α : F ≅ G) : G.op ≅ F.op :=
{ hom := nat_trans.op α.hom,
inv := nat_trans.op α.inv,
hom_inv_id' := begin ext, dsimp, rw ←op_comp, rw α.inv_hom_id_app, refl, end,
inv_hom_id' := begin ext, dsimp, rw ←op_comp, rw α.hom_inv_id_app, refl, end }
/-- The natural isomorphism between functors `G ≅ F` induced by a natural isomorphism
between the opposite functors `F.op ≅ G.op`. -/
@[simps] protected def remove_op (α : F.op ≅ G.op) : G ≅ F :=
{ hom := nat_trans.remove_op α.hom,
inv := nat_trans.remove_op α.inv,
hom_inv_id' := begin ext, dsimp, rw ←unop_comp, rw α.inv_hom_id_app, refl, end,
inv_hom_id' := begin ext, dsimp, rw ←unop_comp, rw α.hom_inv_id_app, refl, end }
/-- The natural isomorphism between functors `G.unop ≅ F.unop` induced by a natural isomorphism
between the original functors `F ≅ G`. -/
@[simps] protected def unop {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (α : F ≅ G) : G.unop ≅ F.unop :=
{ hom := nat_trans.unop α.hom,
inv := nat_trans.unop α.inv,
hom_inv_id' := begin ext, dsimp, rw ←unop_comp, rw α.inv_hom_id_app, refl, end,
inv_hom_id' := begin ext, dsimp, rw ←unop_comp, rw α.hom_inv_id_app, refl, end }
end nat_iso
namespace equivalence
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
/--
An equivalence between categories gives an equivalence between the opposite categories.
-/
@[simps]
def op (e : C ≌ D) : Cᵒᵖ ≌ Dᵒᵖ :=
{ functor := e.functor.op,
inverse := e.inverse.op,
unit_iso := (nat_iso.op e.unit_iso).symm,
counit_iso := (nat_iso.op e.counit_iso).symm,
functor_unit_iso_comp' := λ X, by { apply quiver.hom.unop_inj, dsimp, simp, }, }
/--
An equivalence between opposite categories gives an equivalence between the original categories.
-/
@[simps]
def unop (e : Cᵒᵖ ≌ Dᵒᵖ) : C ≌ D :=
{ functor := e.functor.unop,
inverse := e.inverse.unop,
unit_iso := (nat_iso.unop e.unit_iso).symm,
counit_iso := (nat_iso.unop e.counit_iso).symm,
functor_unit_iso_comp' := λ X, by { apply quiver.hom.op_inj, dsimp, simp, }, }
end equivalence
/-- The equivalence between arrows of the form `A ⟶ B` and `B.unop ⟶ A.unop`. Useful for building
adjunctions.
Note that this (definitionally) gives variants
```
def op_equiv' (A : C) (B : Cᵒᵖ) : (opposite.op A ⟶ B) ≃ (B.unop ⟶ A) :=
op_equiv _ _
def op_equiv'' (A : Cᵒᵖ) (B : C) : (A ⟶ opposite.op B) ≃ (B ⟶ A.unop) :=
op_equiv _ _
def op_equiv''' (A B : C) : (opposite.op A ⟶ opposite.op B) ≃ (B ⟶ A) :=
op_equiv _ _
```
-/
@[simps] def op_equiv (A B : Cᵒᵖ) : (A ⟶ B) ≃ (B.unop ⟶ A.unop) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f.unop,
inv_fun := λ g, g.op,
left_inv := λ _, rfl,
right_inv := λ _, rfl }
instance subsingleton_of_unop (A B : Cᵒᵖ) [subsingleton (unop B ⟶ unop A)] : subsingleton (A ⟶ B) :=
(op_equiv A B).subsingleton
instance decidable_eq_of_unop (A B : Cᵒᵖ) [decidable_eq (unop B ⟶ unop A)] : decidable_eq (A ⟶ B) :=
(op_equiv A B).decidable_eq
/--
The equivalence between isomorphisms of the form `A ≅ B` and `B.unop ≅ A.unop`.
Note this is definitionally the same as the other three variants:
* `(opposite.op A ≅ B) ≃ (B.unop ≅ A)`
* `(A ≅ opposite.op B) ≃ (B ≅ A.unop)`
* `(opposite.op A ≅ opposite.op B) ≃ (B ≅ A)`
-/
@[simps] def iso_op_equiv (A B : Cᵒᵖ) : (A ≅ B) ≃ (B.unop ≅ A.unop) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f.unop,
inv_fun := λ g, g.op,
left_inv := λ _, by { ext, refl, },
right_inv := λ _, by { ext, refl, } }
namespace functor
variables (C)
variables (D : Type u₂) [category.{v₂} D]
/--
The equivalence of functor categories induced by `op` and `unop`.
-/
@[simps]
def op_unop_equiv : (C ⥤ D)ᵒᵖ ≌ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ :=
{ functor := op_hom _ _,
inverse := op_inv _ _,
unit_iso := nat_iso.of_components (λ F, F.unop.op_unop_iso.op) begin
intros F G f,
dsimp [op_unop_iso],
rw [(show f = f.unop.op, by simp), ← op_comp, ← op_comp],
congr' 1,
tidy,
end,
counit_iso := nat_iso.of_components (λ F, F.unop_op_iso) (by tidy) }.
/--
The equivalence of functor categories induced by `left_op` and `right_op`.
-/
@[simps]
def left_op_right_op_equiv : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D)ᵒᵖ ≌ (C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) :=
{ functor :=
{ obj := λ F, F.unop.right_op,
map := λ F G η, η.unop.right_op },
inverse :=
{ obj := λ F, op F.left_op,
map := λ F G η, η.left_op.op },
unit_iso := nat_iso.of_components (λ F, F.unop.right_op_left_op_iso.op) begin
intros F G η,
dsimp,
rw [(show η = η.unop.op, by simp), ← op_comp, ← op_comp],
congr' 1,
tidy,
end,
counit_iso := nat_iso.of_components (λ F, F.left_op_right_op_iso) (by tidy) }
end functor
end category_theory
|
fbcfc8c5fa1610a1dcbc0ea3441dcd3a19b7bd84 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/combinatorics/simple_graph/regularity/equitabilise.lean | 2f264fd6908dcb92cf7efd9c09fe77b56344074c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,580 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import order.partition.equipartition
/-!
# Equitabilising a partition
This file allows to blow partitions up into parts of controlled size. Given a partition `P` and
`a b m : ℕ`, we want to find a partition `Q` with `a` parts of size `m` and `b` parts of size
`m + 1` such that all parts of `P` are "as close as possible" to unions of parts of `Q`. By
"as close as possible", we mean that each part of `P` can be written as the union of some parts of
`Q` along with at most `m` other elements.
## Main declarations
* `finpartition.equitabilise`: `P.equitabilise h` where `h : a * m + b * (m + 1)` is a partition
with `a` parts of size `m` and `b` parts of size `m + 1` which almost refines `P`.
* `finpartition.exists_equipartition_card_eq`: We can find equipartitions of arbitrary size.
-/
open finset nat
namespace finpartition
variables {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] {s t : finset α} {m n a b : ℕ} {P : finpartition s}
/-- Given a partition `P` of `s`, as well as a proof that `a * m + b * (m + 1) = s.card`, we can
find a new partition `Q` of `s` where each part has size `m` or `m + 1`, every part of `P` is the
union of parts of `Q` plus at most `m` extra elements, there are `b` parts of size `m + 1` and
(provided `m > 0`, because a partition does not have parts of size `0`) there are `a` parts of size
`m` and hence `a + b` parts in total. -/
lemma equitabilise_aux (P : finpartition s) (hs : a * m + b * (m + 1) = s.card) :
∃ Q : finpartition s,
(∀ x : finset α, x ∈ Q.parts → x.card = m ∨ x.card = m + 1) ∧
(∀ x, x ∈ P.parts → (x \ (Q.parts.filter $ λ y, y ⊆ x).bUnion id).card ≤ m) ∧
(Q.parts.filter $ λ i, card i = m + 1).card = b :=
begin
-- Get rid of the easy case `m = 0`
obtain rfl | m_pos := m.eq_zero_or_pos,
{ refine ⟨⊥, by simp, _, by simpa using hs.symm⟩,
simp only [le_zero_iff, card_eq_zero, mem_bUnion, exists_prop, mem_filter, id.def, and_assoc,
sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_iff],
exact λ x hx a ha, ⟨{a}, mem_map_of_mem _ (P.le hx ha), singleton_subset_iff.2 ha,
mem_singleton_self _⟩ },
-- Prove the case `m > 0` by strong induction on `s`
induction s using finset.strong_induction with s ih generalizing P a b,
-- If `a = b = 0`, then `s = ∅` and we can partition into zero parts
by_cases hab : a = 0 ∧ b = 0,
{ simp only [hab.1, hab.2, add_zero, zero_mul, eq_comm, card_eq_zero] at hs,
subst hs,
exact ⟨finpartition.empty _, by simp, by simp [unique.eq_default P], by simp [hab.2]⟩ },
simp_rw [not_and_distrib, ←ne.def, ←pos_iff_ne_zero] at hab,
-- `n` will be the size of the smallest part
set n := if 0 < a then m else m + 1 with hn,
-- Some easy facts about it
obtain ⟨hn₀, hn₁, hn₂, hn₃⟩ : 0 < n ∧ n ≤ m + 1 ∧ n ≤ a * m + b * (m + 1) ∧
ite (0 < a) (a - 1) a * m + ite (0 < a) b (b - 1) * (m + 1) = s.card - n,
{ rw [hn, ←hs],
split_ifs; rw [tsub_mul, one_mul],
{ refine ⟨m_pos, le_succ _, le_add_right (le_mul_of_pos_left ‹0 < a›), _⟩,
rw tsub_add_eq_add_tsub (le_mul_of_pos_left h), },
{ refine ⟨succ_pos', le_rfl, le_add_left (le_mul_of_pos_left $ hab.resolve_left ‹¬0 < a›), _⟩,
rw ←add_tsub_assoc_of_le (le_mul_of_pos_left $ hab.resolve_left ‹¬0 < a›) } },
/- We will call the inductive hypothesis on a partition of `s \ t` for a carefully chosen `t ⊆ s`.
To decide which, however, we must distinguish the case where all parts of `P` have size `m` (in
which case we take `t` to be an arbitrary subset of `s` of size `n`) from the case where at least
one part `u` of `P` has size `m + 1` (in which case we take `t` to be an arbitrary subset of `u`
of size `n`). The rest of each branch is just tedious calculations to satisfy the induction
hypothesis. -/
by_cases ∀ u ∈ P.parts, card u < m + 1,
{ obtain ⟨t, hts, htn⟩ := exists_smaller_set s n (hn₂.trans_eq hs),
have ht : t.nonempty := by rwa [←card_pos, htn],
have hcard : ite (0 < a) (a - 1) a * m + ite (0 < a) b (b - 1) * (m + 1) = (s \ t).card,
{ rw [card_sdiff ‹t ⊆ s›, htn, hn₃] },
obtain ⟨R, hR₁, hR₂, hR₃⟩ := @ih (s \ t) (sdiff_ssubset hts ‹t.nonempty›) (P.avoid t)
(if 0 < a then a-1 else a) (if 0 < a then b else b-1) hcard,
refine ⟨R.extend ht.ne_empty sdiff_disjoint (sdiff_sup_cancel hts), _, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [extend_parts, mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, and_iff_left hR₁, htn, hn],
exact ite_eq_or_eq _ _ _ },
{ exact λ x hx, (card_le_of_subset $ sdiff_subset _ _).trans (lt_succ_iff.1 $ h _ hx) },
simp_rw [extend_parts, filter_insert, htn, hn, m.succ_ne_self.symm.ite_eq_right_iff],
split_ifs with ha,
{ rw [hR₃, if_pos ha] },
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (λ H, _), hR₃, if_neg ha, tsub_add_cancel_of_le],
{ exact hab.resolve_left ha },
{ exact ht.ne_empty (le_sdiff_iff.1 $ R.le $ filter_subset _ _ H) } },
push_neg at h,
obtain ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := h,
obtain ⟨t, htu, htn⟩ := exists_smaller_set _ _ (hn₁.trans hu₂),
have ht : t.nonempty := by rwa [←card_pos, htn],
have hcard : ite (0 < a) (a - 1) a * m + ite (0 < a) b (b - 1) * (m + 1) = (s \ t).card,
{ rw [card_sdiff (htu.trans $ P.le hu₁), htn, hn₃] },
obtain ⟨R, hR₁, hR₂, hR₃⟩ := @ih (s \ t) (sdiff_ssubset (htu.trans $ P.le hu₁) ht) (P.avoid t)
(if 0 < a then a-1 else a) (if 0 < a then b else b-1) hcard,
refine ⟨R.extend ht.ne_empty sdiff_disjoint (sdiff_sup_cancel $ htu.trans $ P.le hu₁), _, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, extend_parts, and_iff_left hR₁, htn, hn],
exact ite_eq_or_eq _ _ _ },
{ conv in (_ ∈ _) {rw ←insert_erase hu₁},
simp only [and_imp, mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, ne.def, extend_parts],
refine ⟨_, λ x hx, (card_le_of_subset _).trans $ hR₂ x _⟩,
{ simp only [filter_insert, if_pos htu, bUnion_insert, mem_erase, id.def],
obtain rfl | hut := eq_or_ne u t,
{ rw sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset.2 (subset_union_left _ _),
exact bot_le },
refine (card_le_of_subset $ λ i, _).trans (hR₂ (u \ t) $
P.mem_avoid.2 ⟨u, hu₁, λ i, hut $ i.antisymm htu, rfl⟩),
simp only [not_exists, mem_bUnion, and_imp, mem_union, mem_filter, mem_sdiff, id.def,
not_or_distrib],
exact λ hi₁ hi₂ hi₃, ⟨⟨hi₁, hi₂⟩, λ x hx hx', hi₃ _ hx $ hx'.trans $ sdiff_subset _ _⟩ },
{ apply sdiff_subset_sdiff subset.rfl (bUnion_subset_bUnion_of_subset_left _ _),
exact filter_subset_filter _ (subset_insert _ _) },
simp only [avoid, of_erase, mem_erase, mem_image, bot_eq_empty],
exact ⟨(nonempty_of_mem_parts _ $ mem_of_mem_erase hx).ne_empty, _, mem_of_mem_erase hx,
(disjoint_of_subset_right htu $ P.disjoint (mem_of_mem_erase hx) hu₁ $
ne_of_mem_erase hx).sdiff_eq_left⟩ },
simp only [extend_parts, filter_insert, htn, hn, m.succ_ne_self.symm.ite_eq_right_iff],
split_ifs,
{ rw [hR₃, if_pos h] },
{ rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (λ H, _), hR₃, if_neg h, nat.sub_add_cancel (hab.resolve_left h)],
exact ht.ne_empty (le_sdiff_iff.1 $ R.le $ filter_subset _ _ H) }
end
variables (P) (h : a * m + b * (m + 1) = s.card)
/-- Given a partition `P` of `s`, as well as a proof that `a * m + b * (m + 1) = s.card`, build a
new partition `Q` of `s` where each part has size `m` or `m + 1`, every part of `P` is the union of
parts of `Q` plus at most `m` extra elements, there are `b` parts of size `m + 1` and (provided
`m > 0`, because a partition does not have parts of size `0`) there are `a` parts of size `m` and
hence `a + b` parts in total. -/
noncomputable def equitabilise : finpartition s := (P.equitabilise_aux h).some
variables {P h}
lemma card_eq_of_mem_parts_equitabilise :
t ∈ (P.equitabilise h).parts → t.card = m ∨ t.card = m + 1 :=
(P.equitabilise_aux h).some_spec.1 _
lemma equitabilise_is_equipartition : (P.equitabilise h).is_equipartition :=
set.equitable_on_iff_exists_eq_eq_add_one.2 ⟨m, λ u, card_eq_of_mem_parts_equitabilise⟩
variables (P h)
lemma card_filter_equitabilise_big :
((P.equitabilise h).parts.filter $ λ u : finset α, u.card = m + 1).card = b :=
(P.equitabilise_aux h).some_spec.2.2
lemma card_filter_equitabilise_small (hm : m ≠ 0) :
((P.equitabilise h).parts.filter $ λ u : finset α, u.card = m).card = a :=
begin
refine (mul_eq_mul_right_iff.1 $ (add_left_inj (b * (m + 1))).1 _).resolve_right hm,
rw [h, ←(P.equitabilise h).sum_card_parts],
have hunion : (P.equitabilise h).parts = (P.equitabilise h).parts.filter (λ u, u.card = m) ∪
(P.equitabilise h).parts.filter (λ u, u.card = m + 1),
{ rw [←filter_or, filter_true_of_mem],
exact λ x, card_eq_of_mem_parts_equitabilise },
nth_rewrite 1 hunion,
rw [sum_union, sum_const_nat (λ x hx, (mem_filter.1 hx).2),
sum_const_nat (λ x hx, (mem_filter.1 hx).2), P.card_filter_equitabilise_big],
refine disjoint_filter_filter' _ _ _,
intros x ha hb i h,
apply succ_ne_self m _,
exact (hb i h).symm.trans (ha i h),
end
lemma card_parts_equitabilise (hm : m ≠ 0) : (P.equitabilise h).parts.card = a + b :=
begin
rw [←filter_true_of_mem (λ x, card_eq_of_mem_parts_equitabilise), filter_or, card_union_eq,
P.card_filter_equitabilise_small _ hm, P.card_filter_equitabilise_big],
exact disjoint_filter.2 (λ x _ h₀ h₁, nat.succ_ne_self m $ h₁.symm.trans h₀),
apply_instance
end
lemma card_parts_equitabilise_subset_le :
t ∈ P.parts → (t \ ((P.equitabilise h).parts.filter $ λ u, u ⊆ t).bUnion id).card ≤ m :=
(classical.some_spec $ P.equitabilise_aux h).2.1 t
variables (s)
/-- We can find equipartitions of arbitrary size. -/
lemma exists_equipartition_card_eq (hn : n ≠ 0) (hs : n ≤ s.card) :
∃ P : finpartition s, P.is_equipartition ∧ P.parts.card = n :=
begin
rw ←pos_iff_ne_zero at hn,
have : (n - s.card % n) * (s.card / n) + (s.card % n) * (s.card / n + 1) = s.card,
{ rw [tsub_mul, mul_add, ←add_assoc, tsub_add_cancel_of_le
(nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (mod_lt _ hn).le), mul_one, add_comm, mod_add_div] },
refine ⟨(indiscrete (card_pos.1 $ hn.trans_le hs).ne_empty).equitabilise this,
equitabilise_is_equipartition, _⟩,
rw [card_parts_equitabilise _ _ (nat.div_pos hs hn).ne', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (mod_lt _ hn).le],
end
end finpartition
|
975d883c9a2aa881c1ba45ba184cda16cd887c37 | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/data/equiv/basic.lean | 78d0f60eb82f24129e482f576525c8bd59bc248b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 100,445 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.set.function
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we define two types:
* `equiv α β` a.k.a. `α ≃ β`: a bijective map `α → β` bundled with its inverse map; we use this (and
not equality!) to express that various `Type`s or `Sort`s are equivalent.
* `equiv.perm α`: the group of permutations `α ≃ α`. More lemmas about `equiv.perm` can be found in
`group_theory/perm`.
Then we define
* canonical isomorphisms between various types: e.g.,
- `equiv.refl α` is the identity map interpreted as `α ≃ α`;
- `equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool` is the canonical equivalence between the sum of two types `α ⊕ β`
and the sigma-type `Σ b : bool, cond b α β`;
- `equiv.prod_sum_distrib : α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ)` shows that type product and type sum
satisfy the distributive law up to a canonical equivalence;
* operations on equivalences: e.g.,
- `equiv.symm e : β ≃ α` is the inverse of `e : α ≃ β`;
- `equiv.trans e₁ e₂ : α ≃ γ` is the composition of `e₁ : α ≃ β` and `e₂ : β ≃ γ` (note the order
of the arguments!);
- `equiv.prod_congr ea eb : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂`: combine two equivalences `ea : α₁ ≃ α₂` and
`eb : β₁ ≃ β₂` using `prod.map`.
* definitions that transfer some instances along an equivalence. By convention, we transfer
instances from right to left.
- `equiv.inhabited` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[inhabited β]` and returns `inhabited α`;
- `equiv.unique` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[unique β]` and returns `unique α`;
- `equiv.decidable_eq` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[decidable_eq β]` and returns `decidable_eq α`.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files. E.g., `data/equiv/transfer_instance`
does it for many algebraic type classes like `group`, `module`, etc.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
open function
universes u v w z
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w}
/-- `α ≃ β` is the type of functions from `α → β` with a two-sided inverse. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure equiv (α : Sort*) (β : Sort*) :=
(to_fun : α → β)
(inv_fun : β → α)
(left_inv : left_inverse inv_fun to_fun)
(right_inv : right_inverse inv_fun to_fun)
infix ` ≃ `:25 := equiv
/-- Convert an involutive function `f` to an equivalence with `to_fun = inv_fun = f`. -/
def function.involutive.to_equiv (f : α → α) (h : involutive f) : α ≃ α :=
⟨f, f, h.left_inverse, h.right_inverse⟩
namespace equiv
/-- `perm α` is the type of bijections from `α` to itself. -/
@[reducible] def perm (α : Sort*) := equiv α α
instance : has_coe_to_fun (α ≃ β) :=
⟨_, to_fun⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : (equiv.mk f g l r : α → β) = f :=
rfl
/-- The map `coe_fn : (r ≃ s) → (r → s)` is injective. -/
theorem coe_fn_injective : function.injective (λ (e : α ≃ β) (x : α), e x)
| ⟨f₁, g₁, l₁, r₁⟩ ⟨f₂, g₂, l₂, r₂⟩ h :=
have f₁ = f₂, from h,
have g₁ = g₂, from l₁.eq_right_inverse (this.symm ▸ r₂),
by simp *
@[simp, norm_cast] protected lemma coe_inj {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ β} : ⇑e₁ = e₂ ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
coe_fn_injective.eq_iff
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : equiv α β} (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_fn_injective (funext H)
protected lemma congr_arg {f : equiv α β} : Π {x x' : α}, x = x' → f x = f x'
| _ _ rfl := rfl
protected lemma congr_fun {f g : equiv α β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x := h ▸ rfl
lemma ext_iff {f g : equiv α β} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, ext⟩
@[ext] lemma perm.ext {σ τ : equiv.perm α} (H : ∀ x, σ x = τ x) : σ = τ :=
equiv.ext H
protected lemma perm.congr_arg {f : equiv.perm α} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
equiv.congr_arg
protected lemma perm.congr_fun {f g : equiv.perm α} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
equiv.congr_fun h x
lemma perm.ext_iff {σ τ : equiv.perm α} : σ = τ ↔ ∀ x, σ x = τ x :=
ext_iff
/-- Any type is equivalent to itself. -/
@[refl] protected def refl (α : Sort*) : α ≃ α := ⟨id, id, λ x, rfl, λ x, rfl⟩
instance inhabited' : inhabited (α ≃ α) := ⟨equiv.refl α⟩
/-- Inverse of an equivalence `e : α ≃ β`. -/
@[symm] protected def symm (e : α ≃ β) : β ≃ α := ⟨e.inv_fun, e.to_fun, e.right_inv, e.left_inv⟩
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) : β → α := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections equiv (to_fun → apply, inv_fun → symm_apply)
-- Generate the `simps` projections for previously defined equivs.
attribute [simps] function.involutive.to_equiv
/-- Composition of equivalences `e₁ : α ≃ β` and `e₂ : β ≃ γ`. -/
@[trans] protected def trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) : α ≃ γ :=
⟨e₂ ∘ e₁, e₁.symm ∘ e₂.symm,
e₂.left_inv.comp e₁.left_inv, e₂.right_inv.comp e₁.right_inv⟩
@[simp]
lemma to_fun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.to_fun = e := rfl
@[simp]
lemma inv_fun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.inv_fun = e.symm := rfl
protected theorem injective (e : α ≃ β) : injective e :=
e.left_inv.injective
protected theorem surjective (e : α ≃ β) : surjective e :=
e.right_inv.surjective
protected theorem bijective (f : α ≃ β) : bijective f :=
⟨f.injective, f.surjective⟩
@[simp] lemma range_eq_univ {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) : set.range e = set.univ :=
set.eq_univ_of_forall e.surjective
protected theorem subsingleton (e : α ≃ β) [subsingleton β] : subsingleton α :=
e.injective.subsingleton
protected theorem subsingleton.symm (e : α ≃ β) [subsingleton α] : subsingleton β :=
e.symm.injective.subsingleton
lemma subsingleton_iff (e : α ≃ β) : subsingleton α ↔ subsingleton β :=
⟨λ h, by exactI e.symm.subsingleton, λ h, by exactI e.subsingleton⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_cod [subsingleton β] :
subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨λ f g, equiv.ext $ λ x, subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_dom [subsingleton α] :
subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨λ f g, equiv.ext $ λ x, @subsingleton.elim _ (equiv.subsingleton.symm f) _ _⟩
instance perm_subsingleton [subsingleton α] : subsingleton (perm α) :=
equiv.equiv_subsingleton_cod
lemma perm.subsingleton_eq_refl [subsingleton α] (e : perm α) :
e = equiv.refl α := subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- Transfer `decidable_eq` across an equivalence. -/
protected def decidable_eq (e : α ≃ β) [decidable_eq β] : decidable_eq α :=
e.injective.decidable_eq
lemma nonempty_iff_nonempty (e : α ≃ β) : nonempty α ↔ nonempty β :=
nonempty.congr e e.symm
/-- If `α ≃ β` and `β` is inhabited, then so is `α`. -/
protected def inhabited [inhabited β] (e : α ≃ β) : inhabited α :=
⟨e.symm (default _)⟩
/-- If `α ≃ β` and `β` is a singleton type, then so is `α`. -/
protected def unique [unique β] (e : α ≃ β) : unique α :=
e.symm.surjective.unique
/-- Equivalence between equal types. -/
protected def cast {α β : Sort*} (h : α = β) : α ≃ β :=
⟨cast h, cast h.symm, λ x, by { cases h, refl }, λ x, by { cases h, refl }⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_symm_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : ((equiv.mk f g l r).symm : β → α) = g :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_refl : ⇑(equiv.refl α) = id := rfl
@[simp] theorem perm.coe_subsingleton {α : Type*} [subsingleton α] (e : perm α) : ⇑(e) = id :=
by rw [perm.subsingleton_eq_refl e, coe_refl]
theorem refl_apply (x : α) : equiv.refl α x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) : ⇑(f.trans g) = g ∘ f := rfl
theorem trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : β) : e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.right_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : α) : e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.left_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_comp_self (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm ∘ e = id := funext e.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] theorem self_comp_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e ∘ e.symm = id := funext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma symm_trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : γ) :
(f.trans g).symm a = f.symm (g.symm a) := rfl
-- The `simp` attribute is needed to make this a `dsimp` lemma.
-- `simp` will always rewrite with `equiv.symm_symm` before this has a chance to fire.
@[simp, nolint simp_nf] theorem symm_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (b : α) : f.symm.symm b = f b := rfl
@[simp] theorem apply_eq_iff_eq (f : α ≃ β) {x y : α} : f x = f y ↔ x = y :=
f.injective.eq_iff
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply {α β : Sort*} (f : α ≃ β) {x : α} {y : β} :
f x = y ↔ x = f.symm y :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw ←apply_symm_apply f y, },
rw apply_eq_iff_eq,
end
@[simp] theorem cast_apply {α β} (h : α = β) (x : α) : equiv.cast h x = cast h x := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_symm {α β} (h : α = β) : (equiv.cast h).symm = equiv.cast h.symm := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_refl {α} (h : α = α := rfl) : equiv.cast h = equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_trans {α β γ} (h : α = β) (h2 : β = γ) :
(equiv.cast h).trans (equiv.cast h2) = equiv.cast (h.trans h2) :=
ext $ λ x, by { substs h h2, refl }
lemma cast_eq_iff_heq {α β} (h : α = β) {a : α} {b : β} : equiv.cast h a = b ↔ a == b :=
by { subst h, simp }
lemma symm_apply_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
⟨λ H, by simp [H.symm], λ H, by simp [H]⟩
lemma eq_symm_apply {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
(eq_comm.trans e.symm_apply_eq).trans eq_comm
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.symm = e := by { cases e, refl }
@[simp] theorem trans_refl (e : α ≃ β) : e.trans (equiv.refl β) = e := by { cases e, refl }
@[simp] theorem refl_symm : (equiv.refl α).symm = equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_trans (e : α ≃ β) : (equiv.refl α).trans e = e := by { cases e, refl }
@[simp] theorem symm_trans (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.trans e = equiv.refl β := ext (by simp)
@[simp] theorem trans_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.trans e.symm = equiv.refl α := ext (by simp)
lemma trans_assoc {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (bc : β ≃ γ) (cd : γ ≃ δ) :
(ab.trans bc).trans cd = ab.trans (bc.trans cd) :=
equiv.ext $ assume a, rfl
theorem left_inverse_symm (f : equiv α β) : left_inverse f.symm f := f.left_inv
theorem right_inverse_symm (f : equiv α β) : function.right_inverse f.symm f := f.right_inv
@[simp] lemma injective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : injective (f ∘ e) ↔ injective f :=
injective.of_comp_iff' f e.bijective
@[simp] lemma comp_injective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : injective (e ∘ f) ↔ injective f :=
e.injective.of_comp_iff f
@[simp] lemma surjective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : surjective (f ∘ e) ↔ surjective f :=
e.surjective.of_comp_iff f
@[simp] lemma comp_surjective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : surjective (e ∘ f) ↔ surjective f :=
surjective.of_comp_iff' e.bijective f
@[simp] lemma bijective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : bijective (f ∘ e) ↔ bijective f :=
e.bijective.of_comp_iff f
@[simp] lemma comp_bijective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : bijective (e ∘ f) ↔ bijective f :=
bijective.of_comp_iff' e.bijective f
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and `γ` is equivalent to `δ`, then the type of equivalences `α ≃ γ`
is equivalent to the type of equivalences `β ≃ δ`. -/
def equiv_congr {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) : (α ≃ γ) ≃ (β ≃ δ) :=
⟨ λac, (ab.symm.trans ac).trans cd, λbd, ab.trans $ bd.trans $ cd.symm,
assume ac, by { ext x, simp }, assume ac, by { ext x, simp } ⟩
@[simp] lemma equiv_congr_refl {α β} :
(equiv.refl α).equiv_congr (equiv.refl β) = equiv.refl (α ≃ β) := by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma equiv_congr_symm {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) :
(ab.equiv_congr cd).symm = ab.symm.equiv_congr cd.symm := by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma equiv_congr_trans {δ ε ζ} (ab : α ≃ β) (de : δ ≃ ε) (bc : β ≃ γ) (ef : ε ≃ ζ) :
(ab.equiv_congr de).trans (bc.equiv_congr ef) = (ab.trans bc).equiv_congr (de.trans ef) :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma equiv_congr_refl_left {α β γ} (bg : β ≃ γ) (e : α ≃ β) :
(equiv.refl α).equiv_congr bg e = e.trans bg := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_congr_refl_right {α β} (ab e : α ≃ β) :
ab.equiv_congr (equiv.refl β) e = ab.symm.trans e := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_congr_apply_apply {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) (e : α ≃ γ) (x) :
ab.equiv_congr cd e x = cd (e (ab.symm x)) := rfl
section perm_congr
variables {α' β' : Type*} (e : α' ≃ β')
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `perm α` is equivalent to `perm β`. -/
def perm_congr : perm α' ≃ perm β' :=
equiv_congr e e
lemma perm_congr_def (p : equiv.perm α') :
e.perm_congr p = (e.symm.trans p).trans e := rfl
@[simp] lemma perm_congr_refl :
e.perm_congr (equiv.refl _) = equiv.refl _ :=
by simp [perm_congr_def]
@[simp] lemma perm_congr_symm :
e.perm_congr.symm = e.symm.perm_congr := rfl
@[simp] lemma perm_congr_apply (p : equiv.perm α') (x) :
e.perm_congr p x = e (p (e.symm x)) := rfl
lemma perm_congr_symm_apply (p : equiv.perm β') (x) :
e.perm_congr.symm p x = e.symm (p (e x)) := rfl
lemma perm_congr_trans (p p' : equiv.perm α') :
(e.perm_congr p).trans (e.perm_congr p') = e.perm_congr (p.trans p') :=
by { ext, simp }
end perm_congr
protected lemma image_eq_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set α) : e '' s = e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
set.ext $ assume x, set.mem_image_iff_of_inverse e.left_inv e.right_inv
protected lemma subset_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
t ⊆ e '' s ↔ e.symm '' t ⊆ s :=
by rw [set.image_subset_iff, e.image_eq_preimage]
@[simp] lemma symm_image_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set α) : e.symm '' (e '' s) = s :=
by { rw [← set.image_comp], simp }
lemma eq_image_iff_symm_image_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
t = e '' s ↔ e.symm '' t = s :=
begin
refine (injective.eq_iff' _ _).symm,
{ rw set.image_injective,
exact (equiv.symm e).injective },
{ exact equiv.symm_image_image _ _ }
end
@[simp] lemma image_symm_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set β) : e '' (e.symm '' s) = s :=
e.symm.symm_image_image s
@[simp] lemma image_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set β) : e '' (e ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.surjective.image_preimage s
@[simp] lemma preimage_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set α) : e ⁻¹' (e '' s) = s :=
set.preimage_image_eq s e.injective
protected lemma image_compl {α β} (f : equiv α β) (s : set α) :
f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
set.image_compl_eq f.bijective
@[simp] lemma symm_preimage_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set β) :
e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = s :=
by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma preimage_symm_preimage {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set α) :
e ⁻¹' (e.symm ⁻¹' s) = s :=
by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma preimage_subset {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : set β) : e ⁻¹' s ⊆ e ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
e.surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
@[simp] lemma image_subset {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : set α) : e '' s ⊆ e '' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
set.image_subset_image_iff e.injective
@[simp] lemma image_eq_iff_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t : set α) : e '' s = e '' t ↔ s = t :=
set.image_eq_image e.injective
lemma preimage_eq_iff_eq_image {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t) : e ⁻¹' s = t ↔ s = e '' t :=
set.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image e.bijective
lemma eq_preimage_iff_image_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) (s t) : s = e ⁻¹' t ↔ e '' s = t :=
set.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq e.bijective
/-- If `α` is an empty type, then it is equivalent to the `empty` type. -/
def equiv_empty (h : α → false) : α ≃ empty :=
⟨λ x, (h x).elim, λ e, e.rec _, λ x, (h x).elim, λ e, e.rec _⟩
/-- `false` is equivalent to `empty`. -/
def false_equiv_empty : false ≃ empty :=
equiv_empty _root_.id
/-- If `α` is an empty type, then it is equivalent to the `pempty` type in any universe. -/
def {u' v'} equiv_pempty {α : Sort v'} (h : α → false) : α ≃ pempty.{u'} :=
⟨λ x, (h x).elim, λ e, e.rec _, λ x, (h x).elim, λ e, e.rec _⟩
/-- `false` is equivalent to `pempty`. -/
def false_equiv_pempty : false ≃ pempty :=
equiv_pempty _root_.id
/-- `empty` is equivalent to `pempty`. -/
def empty_equiv_pempty : empty ≃ pempty :=
equiv_pempty $ empty.rec _
/-- `pempty` types from any two universes are equivalent. -/
def pempty_equiv_pempty : pempty.{v} ≃ pempty.{w} :=
equiv_pempty pempty.elim
/-- If `α` is not `nonempty`, then it is equivalent to `empty`. -/
def empty_of_not_nonempty {α : Sort*} (h : ¬ nonempty α) : α ≃ empty :=
equiv_empty $ assume a, h ⟨a⟩
/-- If `α` is not `nonempty`, then it is equivalent to `pempty`. -/
def pempty_of_not_nonempty {α : Sort*} (h : ¬ nonempty α) : α ≃ pempty :=
equiv_pempty $ assume a, h ⟨a⟩
/-- The `Sort` of proofs of a true proposition is equivalent to `punit`. -/
def prop_equiv_punit {p : Prop} (h : p) : p ≃ punit :=
⟨λ x, (), λ x, h, λ _, rfl, λ ⟨⟩, rfl⟩
/-- `true` is equivalent to `punit`. -/
def true_equiv_punit : true ≃ punit := prop_equiv_punit trivial
/-- `ulift α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply {fully_applied := ff}]
protected def ulift {α : Type v} : ulift.{u} α ≃ α :=
⟨ulift.down, ulift.up, ulift.up_down, λ a, rfl⟩
/-- `plift α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply {fully_applied := ff}]
protected def plift : plift α ≃ α :=
⟨plift.down, plift.up, plift.up_down, plift.down_up⟩
/-- equivalence of propositions is the same as iff -/
def of_iff {P Q : Prop} (h : P ↔ Q) : P ≃ Q :=
{ to_fun := h.mp,
inv_fun := h.mpr,
left_inv := λ x, rfl,
right_inv := λ y, rfl }
/-- If `α₁` is equivalent to `α₂` and `β₁` is equivalent to `β₂`, then the type of maps `α₁ → β₁`
is equivalent to the type of maps `α₂ → β₂`. -/
@[congr, simps apply] def arrow_congr {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Sort*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(α₁ → β₁) ≃ (α₂ → β₂) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, e₂ ∘ f ∘ e₁.symm,
inv_fun := λ f, e₂.symm ∘ f ∘ e₁,
left_inv := λ f, funext $ λ x, by simp,
right_inv := λ f, funext $ λ x, by simp }
lemma arrow_congr_comp {α₁ β₁ γ₁ α₂ β₂ γ₂ : Sort*}
(ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) (ec : γ₁ ≃ γ₂) (f : α₁ → β₁) (g : β₁ → γ₁) :
arrow_congr ea ec (g ∘ f) = (arrow_congr eb ec g) ∘ (arrow_congr ea eb f) :=
by { ext, simp only [comp, arrow_congr_apply, eb.symm_apply_apply] }
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr_refl {α β : Sort*} :
arrow_congr (equiv.refl α) (equiv.refl β) = equiv.refl (α → β) := rfl
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr_trans {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ α₃ β₃ : Sort*}
(e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₁' : β₁ ≃ β₂) (e₂ : α₂ ≃ α₃) (e₂' : β₂ ≃ β₃) :
arrow_congr (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrow_congr e₁ e₁').trans (arrow_congr e₂ e₂') :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr_symm {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Sort*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(arrow_congr e₁ e₂).symm = arrow_congr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
/--
A version of `equiv.arrow_congr` in `Type`, rather than `Sort`.
The `equiv_rw` tactic is not able to use the default `Sort` level `equiv.arrow_congr`,
because Lean's universe rules will not unify `?l_1` with `imax (1 ?m_1)`.
-/
@[congr, simps apply]
def arrow_congr' {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Type*} (hα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (hβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : (α₁ → β₁) ≃ (α₂ → β₂) :=
equiv.arrow_congr hα hβ
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr'_refl {α β : Type*} :
arrow_congr' (equiv.refl α) (equiv.refl β) = equiv.refl (α → β) := rfl
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr'_trans {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ α₃ β₃ : Type*}
(e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₁' : β₁ ≃ β₂) (e₂ : α₂ ≃ α₃) (e₂' : β₂ ≃ β₃) :
arrow_congr' (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrow_congr' e₁ e₁').trans (arrow_congr' e₂ e₂') :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma arrow_congr'_symm {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Type*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(arrow_congr' e₁ e₂).symm = arrow_congr' e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
/-- Conjugate a map `f : α → α` by an equivalence `α ≃ β`. -/
@[simps apply]
def conj (e : α ≃ β) : (α → α) ≃ (β → β) := arrow_congr e e
@[simp] lemma conj_refl : conj (equiv.refl α) = equiv.refl (α → α) := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.conj.symm = e.symm.conj := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) :
(e₁.trans e₂).conj = e₁.conj.trans e₂.conj :=
rfl
-- This should not be a simp lemma as long as `(∘)` is reducible:
-- when `(∘)` is reducible, Lean can unify `f₁ ∘ f₂` with any `g` using
-- `f₁ := g` and `f₂ := λ x, x`. This causes nontermination.
lemma conj_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f₁ f₂ : α → α) :
e.conj (f₁ ∘ f₂) = (e.conj f₁) ∘ (e.conj f₂) :=
by apply arrow_congr_comp
section binary_op
variables {α₁ β₁ : Type*} (e : α₁ ≃ β₁) (f : α₁ → α₁ → α₁)
lemma semiconj_conj (f : α₁ → α₁) : semiconj e f (e.conj f) := λ x, by simp
lemma semiconj₂_conj : semiconj₂ e f (e.arrow_congr e.conj f) := λ x y, by simp
instance [is_associative α₁ f] :
is_associative β₁ (e.arrow_congr (e.arrow_congr e) f) :=
(e.semiconj₂_conj f).is_associative_right e.surjective
instance [is_idempotent α₁ f] :
is_idempotent β₁ (e.arrow_congr (e.arrow_congr e) f) :=
(e.semiconj₂_conj f).is_idempotent_right e.surjective
instance [is_left_cancel α₁ f] :
is_left_cancel β₁ (e.arrow_congr (e.arrow_congr e) f) :=
⟨e.surjective.forall₃.2 $ λ x y z, by simpa using @is_left_cancel.left_cancel _ f _ x y z⟩
instance [is_right_cancel α₁ f] :
is_right_cancel β₁ (e.arrow_congr (e.arrow_congr e) f) :=
⟨e.surjective.forall₃.2 $ λ x y z, by simpa using @is_right_cancel.right_cancel _ f _ x y z⟩
end binary_op
/-- `punit` sorts in any two universes are equivalent. -/
def punit_equiv_punit : punit.{v} ≃ punit.{w} :=
⟨λ _, punit.star, λ _, punit.star, λ u, by { cases u, refl }, λ u, by { cases u, reflexivity }⟩
section
/-- The sort of maps to `punit.{v}` is equivalent to `punit.{w}`. -/
def arrow_punit_equiv_punit (α : Sort*) : (α → punit.{v}) ≃ punit.{w} :=
⟨λ f, punit.star, λ u f, punit.star,
λ f, by { funext x, cases f x, refl }, λ u, by { cases u, reflexivity }⟩
/-- The sort of maps from `punit` is equivalent to the codomain. -/
def punit_arrow_equiv (α : Sort*) : (punit.{u} → α) ≃ α :=
⟨λ f, f punit.star, λ a u, a, λ f, by { ext ⟨⟩, refl }, λ u, rfl⟩
/-- The sort of maps from `true` is equivalent to the codomain. -/
def true_arrow_equiv (α : Sort*) : (true → α) ≃ α :=
⟨λ f, f trivial, λ a u, a, λ f, by { ext ⟨⟩, refl }, λ u, rfl⟩
/-- The sort of maps from `empty` is equivalent to `punit`. -/
def empty_arrow_equiv_punit (α : Sort*) : (empty → α) ≃ punit.{u} :=
⟨λ f, punit.star, λ u e, e.rec _, λ f, funext $ λ x, x.rec _, λ u, by { cases u, refl }⟩
/-- The sort of maps from `pempty` is equivalent to `punit`. -/
def pempty_arrow_equiv_punit (α : Sort*) : (pempty → α) ≃ punit.{u} :=
⟨λ f, punit.star, λ u e, e.rec _, λ f, funext $ λ x, x.rec _, λ u, by { cases u, refl }⟩
/-- The sort of maps from `false` is equivalent to `punit`. -/
def false_arrow_equiv_punit (α : Sort*) : (false → α) ≃ punit.{u} :=
calc (false → α) ≃ (empty → α) : arrow_congr false_equiv_empty (equiv.refl _)
... ≃ punit : empty_arrow_equiv_punit _
end
/-- Product of two equivalences. If `α₁ ≃ α₂` and `β₁ ≃ β₂`, then `α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂`. -/
@[congr, simps apply]
def prod_congr {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Type*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ :=
⟨prod.map e₁ e₂, prod.map e₁.symm e₂.symm, λ ⟨a, b⟩, by simp, λ ⟨a, b⟩, by simp⟩
@[simp] theorem prod_congr_symm {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Type*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(prod_congr e₁ e₂).symm = prod_congr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
/-- Type product is commutative up to an equivalence: `α × β ≃ β × α`. -/
@[simps apply] def prod_comm (α β : Type*) : α × β ≃ β × α :=
⟨prod.swap, prod.swap, λ⟨a, b⟩, rfl, λ⟨a, b⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma prod_comm_symm (α β) : (prod_comm α β).symm = prod_comm β α := rfl
/-- Type product is associative up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps] def prod_assoc (α β γ : Sort*) : (α × β) × γ ≃ α × (β × γ) :=
⟨λ p, (p.1.1, p.1.2, p.2), λp, ((p.1, p.2.1), p.2.2), λ ⟨⟨a, b⟩, c⟩, rfl, λ ⟨a, ⟨b, c⟩⟩, rfl⟩
lemma prod_assoc_preimage {α β γ} {s : set α} {t : set β} {u : set γ} :
equiv.prod_assoc α β γ ⁻¹' s.prod (t.prod u) = (s.prod t).prod u :=
by { ext, simp [and_assoc] }
section
/-- `punit` is a right identity for type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps apply] def prod_punit (α : Type*) : α × punit.{u+1} ≃ α :=
⟨λ p, p.1, λ a, (a, punit.star), λ ⟨_, punit.star⟩, rfl, λ a, rfl⟩
/-- `punit` is a left identity for type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps apply]
def punit_prod (α : Type*) : punit.{u+1} × α ≃ α :=
calc punit × α ≃ α × punit : prod_comm _ _
... ≃ α : prod_punit _
/-- `empty` type is a right absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def prod_empty (α : Type*) : α × empty ≃ empty :=
equiv_empty (λ ⟨_, e⟩, e.rec _)
/-- `empty` type is a left absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def empty_prod (α : Type*) : empty × α ≃ empty :=
equiv_empty (λ ⟨e, _⟩, e.rec _)
/-- `pempty` type is a right absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def prod_pempty (α : Type*) : α × pempty ≃ pempty :=
equiv_pempty (λ ⟨_, e⟩, e.rec _)
/-- `pempty` type is a left absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def pempty_prod (α : Type*) : pempty × α ≃ pempty :=
equiv_pempty (λ ⟨e, _⟩, e.rec _)
end
section
open sum
/-- `psum` is equivalent to `sum`. -/
def psum_equiv_sum (α β : Type*) : psum α β ≃ α ⊕ β :=
⟨λ s, psum.cases_on s inl inr,
λ s, sum.cases_on s psum.inl psum.inr,
λ s, by cases s; refl,
λ s, by cases s; refl⟩
/-- If `α ≃ α'` and `β ≃ β'`, then `α ⊕ β ≃ α' ⊕ β'`. -/
@[simps apply]
def sum_congr {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Type*} (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ ⊕ β₁ ≃ α₂ ⊕ β₂ :=
⟨sum.map ea eb, sum.map ea.symm eb.symm, λ x, by simp, λ x, by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_trans {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ γ₁ γ₂ : Sort*}
(e : α₁ ≃ β₁) (f : α₂ ≃ β₂) (g : β₁ ≃ γ₁) (h : β₂ ≃ γ₂) :
(equiv.sum_congr e f).trans (equiv.sum_congr g h) = (equiv.sum_congr (e.trans g) (f.trans h)) :=
by { ext i, cases i; refl }
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_symm {α β γ δ : Sort*} (e : α ≃ β) (f : γ ≃ δ) :
(equiv.sum_congr e f).symm = (equiv.sum_congr (e.symm) (f.symm)) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_refl {α β : Sort*} :
equiv.sum_congr (equiv.refl α) (equiv.refl β) = equiv.refl (α ⊕ β) :=
by { ext i, cases i; refl }
namespace perm
/-- Combine a permutation of `α` and of `β` into a permutation of `α ⊕ β`. -/
@[reducible]
def sum_congr {α β : Type*} (ea : equiv.perm α) (eb : equiv.perm β) : equiv.perm (α ⊕ β) :=
equiv.sum_congr ea eb
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_apply {α β : Type*} (ea : equiv.perm α) (eb : equiv.perm β) (x : α ⊕ β) :
sum_congr ea eb x = sum.map ⇑ea ⇑eb x := equiv.sum_congr_apply ea eb x
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_trans {α β : Sort*}
(e : equiv.perm α) (f : equiv.perm β) (g : equiv.perm α) (h : equiv.perm β) :
(sum_congr e f).trans (sum_congr g h) = sum_congr (e.trans g) (f.trans h) :=
equiv.sum_congr_trans e f g h
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_symm {α β : Sort*} (e : equiv.perm α) (f : equiv.perm β) :
(sum_congr e f).symm = sum_congr (e.symm) (f.symm) :=
equiv.sum_congr_symm e f
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_refl {α β : Sort*} :
sum_congr (equiv.refl α) (equiv.refl β) = equiv.refl (α ⊕ β) :=
equiv.sum_congr_refl
end perm
/-- `bool` is equivalent the sum of two `punit`s. -/
def bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit : bool ≃ punit.{u+1} ⊕ punit.{v+1} :=
⟨λ b, cond b (inr punit.star) (inl punit.star),
λ s, sum.rec_on s (λ_, ff) (λ_, tt),
λ b, by cases b; refl,
λ s, by rcases s with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩; refl⟩
/-- `Prop` is noncomputably equivalent to `bool`. -/
noncomputable def Prop_equiv_bool : Prop ≃ bool :=
⟨λ p, @to_bool p (classical.prop_decidable _),
λ b, b, λ p, by simp, λ b, by simp⟩
/-- Sum of types is commutative up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps apply]
def sum_comm (α β : Sort*) : α ⊕ β ≃ β ⊕ α :=
⟨sum.swap, sum.swap, sum.swap_swap, sum.swap_swap⟩
@[simp] lemma sum_comm_symm (α β) : (sum_comm α β).symm = sum_comm β α := rfl
/-- Sum of types is associative up to an equivalence. -/
def sum_assoc (α β γ : Sort*) : (α ⊕ β) ⊕ γ ≃ α ⊕ (β ⊕ γ) :=
⟨sum.elim (sum.elim sum.inl (sum.inr ∘ sum.inl)) (sum.inr ∘ sum.inr),
sum.elim (sum.inl ∘ sum.inl) $ sum.elim (sum.inl ∘ sum.inr) sum.inr,
by rintros (⟨_ | _⟩ | _); refl,
by rintros (_ | ⟨_ | _⟩); refl⟩
@[simp] theorem sum_assoc_apply_in1 {α β γ} (a) : sum_assoc α β γ (inl (inl a)) = inl a := rfl
@[simp] theorem sum_assoc_apply_in2 {α β γ} (b) : sum_assoc α β γ (inl (inr b)) = inr (inl b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem sum_assoc_apply_in3 {α β γ} (c) : sum_assoc α β γ (inr c) = inr (inr c) := rfl
/-- Sum with `empty` is equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps symm_apply] def sum_empty (α : Type*) : α ⊕ empty ≃ α :=
⟨sum.elim id (empty.rec _),
inl,
λ s, by { rcases s with _ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩, refl },
λ a, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma sum_empty_apply_inl {α} (a) : sum_empty α (sum.inl a) = a := rfl
/-- The sum of `empty` with any `Sort*` is equivalent to the right summand. -/
@[simps symm_apply] def empty_sum (α : Sort*) : empty ⊕ α ≃ α :=
(sum_comm _ _).trans $ sum_empty _
@[simp] lemma empty_sum_apply_inr {α} (a) : empty_sum α (sum.inr a) = a := rfl
/-- Sum with `pempty` is equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps symm_apply] def sum_pempty (α : Type*) : α ⊕ pempty ≃ α :=
⟨sum.elim id (pempty.rec _),
inl,
λ s, by { rcases s with _ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩, refl },
λ a, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma sum_pempty_apply_inl {α} (a) : sum_pempty α (sum.inl a) = a := rfl
/-- The sum of `pempty` with any `Sort*` is equivalent to the right summand. -/
@[simps symm_apply] def pempty_sum (α : Sort*) : pempty ⊕ α ≃ α :=
(sum_comm _ _).trans $ sum_pempty _
@[simp] lemma pempty_sum_apply_inr {α} (a) : pempty_sum α (sum.inr a) = a := rfl
/-- `option α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ punit` -/
def option_equiv_sum_punit (α : Type*) : option α ≃ α ⊕ punit.{u+1} :=
⟨λ o, match o with none := inr punit.star | some a := inl a end,
λ s, match s with inr _ := none | inl a := some a end,
λ o, by cases o; refl,
λ s, by rcases s with _ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩; refl⟩
@[simp] lemma option_equiv_sum_punit_none {α} :
option_equiv_sum_punit α none = sum.inr punit.star := rfl
@[simp] lemma option_equiv_sum_punit_some {α} (a) :
option_equiv_sum_punit α (some a) = sum.inl a := rfl
@[simp] lemma option_equiv_sum_punit_coe {α} (a : α) :
option_equiv_sum_punit α a = sum.inl a := rfl
@[simp] lemma option_equiv_sum_punit_symm_inl {α} (a) :
(option_equiv_sum_punit α).symm (sum.inl a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma option_equiv_sum_punit_symm_inr {α} (a) :
(option_equiv_sum_punit α).symm (sum.inr a) = none :=
rfl
/-- The set of `x : option α` such that `is_some x` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def option_is_some_equiv (α : Type*) : {x : option α // x.is_some} ≃ α :=
{ to_fun := λ o, option.get o.2,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨some x, dec_trivial⟩,
left_inv := λ o, subtype.eq $ option.some_get _,
right_inv := λ x, option.get_some _ _ }
/-- `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to a `sigma`-type over `bool`. Note that this definition assumes `α` and
`β` to be types from the same universe, so it cannot by used directly to transfer theorems about
sigma types to theorems about sum types. In many cases one can use `ulift` to work around this
difficulty. -/
def sum_equiv_sigma_bool (α β : Type u) : α ⊕ β ≃ (Σ b: bool, cond b α β) :=
⟨λ s, s.elim (λ x, ⟨tt, x⟩) (λ x, ⟨ff, x⟩),
λ s, match s with ⟨tt, a⟩ := inl a | ⟨ff, b⟩ := inr b end,
λ s, by cases s; refl,
λ s, by rcases s with ⟨_|_, _⟩; refl⟩
/-- `sigma_preimage_equiv f` for `f : α → β` is the natural equivalence between
the type of all fibres of `f` and the total space `α`. -/
@[simps]
def sigma_preimage_equiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
(Σ y : β, {x // f x = y}) ≃ α :=
⟨λ x, ↑x.2, λ x, ⟨f x, x, rfl⟩, λ ⟨y, x, rfl⟩, rfl, λ x, rfl⟩
/-- A set `s` in `α × β` is equivalent to the sigma-type `Σ x, {y | (x, y) ∈ s}`. -/
def set_prod_equiv_sigma {α β : Type*} (s : set (α × β)) :
s ≃ Σ x : α, {y | (x, y) ∈ s} :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, by simp⟩,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨(x.1, x.2.1), x.2.2⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩, rfl,
right_inv := λ ⟨x, y, h⟩, rfl }
end
section sum_compl
/-- For any predicate `p` on `α`,
the sum of the two subtypes `{a // p a}` and its complement `{a // ¬ p a}`
is naturally equivalent to `α`. -/
def sum_compl {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
{a // p a} ⊕ {a // ¬ p a} ≃ α :=
{ to_fun := sum.elim coe coe,
inv_fun := λ a, if h : p a then sum.inl ⟨a, h⟩ else sum.inr ⟨a, h⟩,
left_inv := by { rintros (⟨x,hx⟩|⟨x,hx⟩); dsimp; [rw dif_pos, rw dif_neg], },
right_inv := λ a, by { dsimp, split_ifs; refl } }
@[simp] lemma sum_compl_apply_inl {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(x : {a // p a}) :
sum_compl p (sum.inl x) = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_compl_apply_inr {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(x : {a // ¬ p a}) :
sum_compl p (sum.inr x) = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_compl_apply_symm_of_pos {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(a : α) (h : p a) :
(sum_compl p).symm a = sum.inl ⟨a, h⟩ := dif_pos h
@[simp] lemma sum_compl_apply_symm_of_neg {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(a : α) (h : ¬ p a) :
(sum_compl p).symm a = sum.inr ⟨a, h⟩ := dif_neg h
/-- Combines an `equiv` between two subtypes with an `equiv` between their complements to form a
permutation. -/
def subtype_congr {α : Type*} {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
(e : {x // p x} ≃ {x // q x}) (f : {x // ¬p x} ≃ {x // ¬q x}) : perm α :=
(sum_compl p).symm.trans ((sum_congr e f).trans
(sum_compl q))
open equiv
variables {ε : Type*} {p : ε → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
variables (ep ep' : perm {a // p a}) (en en' : perm {a // ¬ p a})
/-- Combining permutations on `ε` that permute only inside or outside the subtype
split induced by `p : ε → Prop` constructs a permutation on `ε`. -/
def perm.subtype_congr : equiv.perm ε :=
perm_congr (sum_compl p) (sum_congr ep en)
lemma perm.subtype_congr.apply (a : ε) :
ep.subtype_congr en a = if h : p a then ep ⟨a, h⟩ else en ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by { by_cases h : p a; simp [perm.subtype_congr, h] }
@[simp] lemma perm.subtype_congr.left_apply {a : ε} (h : p a) :
ep.subtype_congr en a = ep ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by simp [perm.subtype_congr.apply, h]
@[simp] lemma perm.subtype_congr.left_apply_subtype (a : {a // p a}) :
ep.subtype_congr en a = ep a :=
by { convert perm.subtype_congr.left_apply _ _ a.property, simp }
@[simp] lemma perm.subtype_congr.right_apply {a : ε} (h : ¬ p a) :
ep.subtype_congr en a = en ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by simp [perm.subtype_congr.apply, h]
@[simp] lemma perm.subtype_congr.right_apply_subtype (a : {a // ¬ p a}) :
ep.subtype_congr en a = en a :=
by { convert perm.subtype_congr.right_apply _ _ a.property, simp }
@[simp] lemma perm.subtype_congr.refl :
perm.subtype_congr (equiv.refl {a // p a}) (equiv.refl {a // ¬ p a}) = equiv.refl ε :=
by { ext x, by_cases h : p x; simp [h] }
@[simp] lemma perm.subtype_congr.symm :
(ep.subtype_congr en).symm = perm.subtype_congr ep.symm en.symm :=
begin
ext x,
by_cases h : p x,
{ have : p (ep.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := subtype.property _,
simp [perm.subtype_congr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this] },
{ have : ¬ p (en.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := subtype.property (en.symm _),
simp [perm.subtype_congr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this] }
end
@[simp] lemma perm.subtype_congr.trans :
(ep.subtype_congr en).trans (ep'.subtype_congr en') =
perm.subtype_congr (ep.trans ep') (en.trans en') :=
begin
ext x,
by_cases h : p x,
{ have : p (ep ⟨x, h⟩) := subtype.property _,
simp [perm.subtype_congr.apply, h, this] },
{ have : ¬ p (en ⟨x, h⟩) := subtype.property (en _),
simp [perm.subtype_congr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this] }
end
end sum_compl
section subtype_preimage
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (x₀ : {a // p a} → β)
/-- For a fixed function `x₀ : {a // p a} → β` defined on a subtype of `α`,
the subtype of functions `x : α → β` that agree with `x₀` on the subtype `{a // p a}`
is naturally equivalent to the type of functions `{a // ¬ p a} → β`. -/
@[simps]
def subtype_preimage :
{x : α → β // x ∘ coe = x₀} ≃ ({a // ¬ p a} → β) :=
{ to_fun := λ (x : {x : α → β // x ∘ coe = x₀}) a, (x : α → β) a,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨λ a, if h : p a then x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ else x ⟨a, h⟩,
funext $ λ ⟨a, h⟩, dif_pos h⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, subtype.val_injective $ funext $ λ a,
(by { dsimp, split_ifs; [ rw ← hx, skip ]; refl }),
right_inv := λ x, funext $ λ ⟨a, h⟩,
show dite (p a) _ _ = _, by { dsimp, rw [dif_neg h] } }
lemma subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe_pos (x : {a // ¬ p a} → β) (a : α) (h : p a) :
((subtype_preimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
lemma subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe_neg (x : {a // ¬ p a} → β) (a : α) (h : ¬ p a) :
((subtype_preimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
end subtype_preimage
section fun_unique
variables (α β) [unique α]
/-- If `α` has a unique term, then the type of function `α → β` is equivalent to `β`. -/
@[simps] def fun_unique : (α → β) ≃ β :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f (default α),
inv_fun := λ b a, b,
left_inv := λ f, funext $ λ a, congr_arg f $ subsingleton.elim _ _,
right_inv := λ b, rfl }
end fun_unique
section
/-- A family of equivalences `Π a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `Π a, β₁ a` and
`Π a, β₂ a`. -/
def Pi_congr_right {α} {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : Π a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (Π a, β₁ a) ≃ (Π a, β₂ a) :=
⟨λ H a, F a (H a), λ H a, (F a).symm (H a),
λ H, funext $ by simp, λ H, funext $ by simp⟩
/-- Dependent `curry` equivalence: the type of dependent functions on `Σ i, β i` is equivalent
to the type of dependent functions of two arguments (i.e., functions to the space of functions). -/
def Pi_curry {α} {β : α → Sort*} (γ : Π a, β a → Sort*) :
(Π x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) ≃ (Π a b, γ a b) :=
{ to_fun := λ f x y, f ⟨x,y⟩,
inv_fun := λ f x, f x.1 x.2,
left_inv := λ f, funext $ λ ⟨x,y⟩, rfl,
right_inv := λ f, funext $ λ x, funext $ λ y, rfl }
end
section
/-- A `psigma`-type is equivalent to the corresponding `sigma`-type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply] def psigma_equiv_sigma {α} (β : α → Sort*) : (Σ' i, β i) ≃ Σ i, β i :=
⟨λ a, ⟨a.1, a.2⟩, λ a, ⟨a.1, a.2⟩, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A family of equivalences `Π a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `Σ a, β₁ a` and
`Σ a, β₂ a`. -/
@[simps apply]
def sigma_congr_right {α} {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : Π a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (Σ a, β₁ a) ≃ Σ a, β₂ a :=
⟨λ a, ⟨a.1, F a.1 a.2⟩, λ a, ⟨a.1, (F a.1).symm a.2⟩,
λ ⟨a, b⟩, congr_arg (sigma.mk a) $ symm_apply_apply (F a) b,
λ ⟨a, b⟩, congr_arg (sigma.mk a) $ apply_symm_apply (F a) b⟩
@[simp] lemma sigma_congr_right_trans {α} {β₁ β₂ β₃ : α → Sort*}
(F : Π a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) (G : Π a, β₂ a ≃ β₃ a) :
(sigma_congr_right F).trans (sigma_congr_right G) = sigma_congr_right (λ a, (F a).trans (G a)) :=
by { ext1 x, cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma sigma_congr_right_symm {α} {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : Π a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) :
(sigma_congr_right F).symm = sigma_congr_right (λ a, (F a).symm) :=
by { ext1 x, cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma sigma_congr_right_refl {α} {β : α → Sort*} :
(sigma_congr_right (λ a, equiv.refl (β a))) = equiv.refl (Σ a, β a) :=
by { ext1 x, cases x, refl }
namespace perm
/-- A family of permutations `Π a, perm (β a)` generates a permuation `perm (Σ a, β₁ a)`. -/
@[reducible]
def sigma_congr_right {α} {β : α → Sort*} (F : Π a, perm (β a)) : perm (Σ a, β a) :=
equiv.sigma_congr_right F
@[simp] lemma sigma_congr_right_trans {α} {β : α → Sort*}
(F : Π a, perm (β a)) (G : Π a, perm (β a)) :
(sigma_congr_right F).trans (sigma_congr_right G) = sigma_congr_right (λ a, (F a).trans (G a)) :=
equiv.sigma_congr_right_trans F G
@[simp] lemma sigma_congr_right_symm {α} {β : α → Sort*} (F : Π a, perm (β a)) :
(sigma_congr_right F).symm = sigma_congr_right (λ a, (F a).symm) :=
equiv.sigma_congr_right_symm F
@[simp] lemma sigma_congr_right_refl {α} {β : α → Sort*} :
(sigma_congr_right (λ a, equiv.refl (β a))) = equiv.refl (Σ a, β a) :=
equiv.sigma_congr_right_refl
end perm
/-- An equivalence `f : α₁ ≃ α₂` generates an equivalence between `Σ a, β (f a)` and `Σ a, β a`. -/
@[simps apply]
def sigma_congr_left {α₁ α₂} {β : α₂ → Sort*} (e : α₁ ≃ α₂) : (Σ a:α₁, β (e a)) ≃ (Σ a:α₂, β a) :=
⟨λ a, ⟨e a.1, a.2⟩, λ a, ⟨e.symm a.1, @@eq.rec β a.2 (e.right_inv a.1).symm⟩,
λ ⟨a, b⟩, match e.symm (e a), e.left_inv a : ∀ a' (h : a' = a),
@sigma.mk _ (β ∘ e) _ (@@eq.rec β b (congr_arg e h.symm)) = ⟨a, b⟩ with
| _, rfl := rfl end,
λ ⟨a, b⟩, match e (e.symm a), _ : ∀ a' (h : a' = a),
sigma.mk a' (@@eq.rec β b h.symm) = ⟨a, b⟩ with
| _, rfl := rfl end⟩
/-- Transporting a sigma type through an equivalence of the base -/
def sigma_congr_left' {α₁ α₂} {β : α₁ → Sort*} (f : α₁ ≃ α₂) :
(Σ a:α₁, β a) ≃ (Σ a:α₂, β (f.symm a)) :=
(sigma_congr_left f.symm).symm
/-- Transporting a sigma type through an equivalence of the base and a family of equivalences
of matching fibers -/
def sigma_congr {α₁ α₂} {β₁ : α₁ → Sort*} {β₂ : α₂ → Sort*} (f : α₁ ≃ α₂)
(F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ (f a)) :
sigma β₁ ≃ sigma β₂ :=
(sigma_congr_right F).trans (sigma_congr_left f)
/-- `sigma` type with a constant fiber is equivalent to the product. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply] def sigma_equiv_prod (α β : Type*) : (Σ_:α, β) ≃ α × β :=
⟨λ a, ⟨a.1, a.2⟩, λ a, ⟨a.1, a.2⟩, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If each fiber of a `sigma` type is equivalent to a fixed type, then the sigma type
is equivalent to the product. -/
def sigma_equiv_prod_of_equiv {α β} {β₁ : α → Sort*} (F : Π a, β₁ a ≃ β) : sigma β₁ ≃ α × β :=
(sigma_congr_right F).trans (sigma_equiv_prod α β)
end
section prod_congr
variables {α₁ β₁ β₂ : Type*} (e : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂)
/-- A family of equivalences `Π (a : α₁), β₁ ≃ β₂` generates an equivalence
between `β₁ × α₁` and `β₂ × α₁`. -/
def prod_congr_left : β₁ × α₁ ≃ β₂ × α₁ :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, ⟨e ab.2 ab.1, ab.2⟩,
inv_fun := λ ab, ⟨(e ab.2).symm ab.1, ab.2⟩,
left_inv := by { rintros ⟨a, b⟩, simp },
right_inv := by { rintros ⟨a, b⟩, simp } }
@[simp] lemma prod_congr_left_apply (b : β₁) (a : α₁) :
prod_congr_left e (b, a) = (e a b, a) := rfl
lemma prod_congr_refl_right (e : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
prod_congr e (equiv.refl α₁) = prod_congr_left (λ _, e) :=
by { ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1, simp }
/-- A family of equivalences `Π (a : α₁), β₁ ≃ β₂` generates an equivalence
between `α₁ × β₁` and `α₁ × β₂`. -/
def prod_congr_right : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₁ × β₂ :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, ⟨ab.1, e ab.1 ab.2⟩,
inv_fun := λ ab, ⟨ab.1, (e ab.1).symm ab.2⟩,
left_inv := by { rintros ⟨a, b⟩, simp },
right_inv := by { rintros ⟨a, b⟩, simp } }
@[simp] lemma prod_congr_right_apply (a : α₁) (b : β₁) :
prod_congr_right e (a, b) = (a, e a b) := rfl
lemma prod_congr_refl_left (e : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
prod_congr (equiv.refl α₁) e = prod_congr_right (λ _, e) :=
by { ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1, simp }
@[simp] lemma prod_congr_left_trans_prod_comm :
(prod_congr_left e).trans (prod_comm _ _) = (prod_comm _ _).trans (prod_congr_right e) :=
by { ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1, simp }
@[simp] lemma prod_congr_right_trans_prod_comm :
(prod_congr_right e).trans (prod_comm _ _) = (prod_comm _ _).trans (prod_congr_left e) :=
by { ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1, simp }
lemma sigma_congr_right_sigma_equiv_prod :
(sigma_congr_right e).trans (sigma_equiv_prod α₁ β₂) =
(sigma_equiv_prod α₁ β₁).trans (prod_congr_right e) :=
by { ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1, simp }
lemma sigma_equiv_prod_sigma_congr_right :
(sigma_equiv_prod α₁ β₁).symm.trans (sigma_congr_right e) =
(prod_congr_right e).trans (sigma_equiv_prod α₁ β₂).symm :=
by { ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1, simp }
/-- A variation on `equiv.prod_congr` where the equivalence in the second component can depend
on the first component. A typical example is a shear mapping, explaining the name of this
declaration. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def prod_shear {α₁ β₁ α₂ β₂ : Type*} (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ :=
{ to_fun := λ x : α₁ × β₁, (e₁ x.1, e₂ x.1 x.2),
inv_fun := λ y : α₂ × β₂, (e₁.symm y.1, (e₂ $ e₁.symm y.1).symm y.2),
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩, simp only [symm_apply_apply] },
right_inv := by { rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩, simp only [apply_symm_apply] } }
end prod_congr
namespace perm
variables {α₁ β₁ β₂ : Type*} [decidable_eq α₁] (a : α₁) (e : perm β₁)
/-- `prod_extend_right a e` extends `e : perm β` to `perm (α × β)` by sending `(a, b)` to
`(a, e b)` and keeping the other `(a', b)` fixed. -/
def prod_extend_right : perm (α₁ × β₁) :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, if ab.fst = a then (a, e ab.snd) else ab,
inv_fun := λ ab, if ab.fst = a then (a, e.symm ab.snd) else ab,
left_inv := by { rintros ⟨k', x⟩, simp only, split_ifs with h; simp [h] },
right_inv := by { rintros ⟨k', x⟩, simp only, split_ifs with h; simp [h] } }
@[simp] lemma prod_extend_right_apply_eq (b : β₁) :
prod_extend_right a e (a, b) = (a, e b) := if_pos rfl
lemma prod_extend_right_apply_ne {a a' : α₁} (h : a' ≠ a) (b : β₁) :
prod_extend_right a e (a', b) = (a', b) := if_neg h
lemma eq_of_prod_extend_right_ne {e : perm β₁} {a a' : α₁} {b : β₁}
(h : prod_extend_right a e (a', b) ≠ (a', b)) : a' = a :=
by { contrapose! h, exact prod_extend_right_apply_ne _ h _ }
@[simp] lemma fst_prod_extend_right (ab : α₁ × β₁) :
(prod_extend_right a e ab).fst = ab.fst :=
begin
rw [prod_extend_right, coe_fn_mk],
split_ifs with h,
{ rw h },
{ refl }
end
end perm
section
/-- The type of functions to a product `α × β` is equivalent to the type of pairs of functions
`γ → α` and `γ → β`. -/
def arrow_prod_equiv_prod_arrow (α β γ : Type*) : (γ → α × β) ≃ (γ → α) × (γ → β) :=
⟨λ f, (λ c, (f c).1, λ c, (f c).2),
λ p c, (p.1 c, p.2 c),
λ f, funext $ λ c, prod.mk.eta,
λ p, by { cases p, refl }⟩
/-- Functions `α → β → γ` are equivalent to functions on `α × β`. -/
def arrow_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow (α β γ : Sort*) : (α → β → γ) ≃ (α × β → γ) :=
⟨uncurry, curry, curry_uncurry, uncurry_curry⟩
open sum
/-- The type of functions on a sum type `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to the type of pairs of functions
on `α` and on `β`. -/
def sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow (α β γ : Type*) : ((α ⊕ β) → γ) ≃ (α → γ) × (β → γ) :=
⟨λ f, (f ∘ inl, f ∘ inr),
λ p, sum.elim p.1 p.2,
λ f, by { ext ⟨⟩; refl },
λ p, by { cases p, refl }⟩
/-- Type product is right distributive with respect to type sum up to an equivalence. -/
def sum_prod_distrib (α β γ : Sort*) : (α ⊕ β) × γ ≃ (α × γ) ⊕ (β × γ) :=
⟨λ p, match p with (inl a, c) := inl (a, c) | (inr b, c) := inr (b, c) end,
λ s, match s with inl q := (inl q.1, q.2) | inr q := (inr q.1, q.2) end,
λ p, by rcases p with ⟨_ | _, _⟩; refl,
λ s, by rcases s with ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩; refl⟩
@[simp] theorem sum_prod_distrib_apply_left {α β γ} (a : α) (c : γ) :
sum_prod_distrib α β γ (sum.inl a, c) = sum.inl (a, c) := rfl
@[simp] theorem sum_prod_distrib_apply_right {α β γ} (b : β) (c : γ) :
sum_prod_distrib α β γ (sum.inr b, c) = sum.inr (b, c) := rfl
/-- Type product is left distributive with respect to type sum up to an equivalence. -/
def prod_sum_distrib (α β γ : Sort*) : α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ) :=
calc α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ (β ⊕ γ) × α : prod_comm _ _
... ≃ (β × α) ⊕ (γ × α) : sum_prod_distrib _ _ _
... ≃ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ) : sum_congr (prod_comm _ _) (prod_comm _ _)
@[simp] theorem prod_sum_distrib_apply_left {α β γ} (a : α) (b : β) :
prod_sum_distrib α β γ (a, sum.inl b) = sum.inl (a, b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem prod_sum_distrib_apply_right {α β γ} (a : α) (c : γ) :
prod_sum_distrib α β γ (a, sum.inr c) = sum.inr (a, c) := rfl
/-- The product of an indexed sum of types (formally, a `sigma`-type `Σ i, α i`) by a type `β` is
equivalent to the sum of products `Σ i, (α i × β)`. -/
def sigma_prod_distrib {ι : Type*} (α : ι → Type*) (β : Type*) :
((Σ i, α i) × β) ≃ (Σ i, (α i × β)) :=
⟨λ p, ⟨p.1.1, (p.1.2, p.2)⟩,
λ p, (⟨p.1, p.2.1⟩, p.2.2),
λ p, by { rcases p with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, refl },
λ p, by { rcases p with ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, refl }⟩
/-- The product `bool × α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ α`. -/
def bool_prod_equiv_sum (α : Type u) : bool × α ≃ α ⊕ α :=
calc bool × α ≃ (unit ⊕ unit) × α : prod_congr bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit (equiv.refl _)
... ≃ (unit × α) ⊕ (unit × α) : sum_prod_distrib _ _ _
... ≃ α ⊕ α : sum_congr (punit_prod _) (punit_prod _)
/-- The function type `bool → α` is equivalent to `α × α`. -/
def bool_to_equiv_prod (α : Type u) : (bool → α) ≃ α × α :=
calc (bool → α) ≃ ((unit ⊕ unit) → α) : (arrow_congr bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit (equiv.refl α))
... ≃ (unit → α) × (unit → α) : sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow _ _ _
... ≃ α × α : prod_congr (punit_arrow_equiv _) (punit_arrow_equiv _)
@[simp] lemma bool_to_equiv_prod_apply {α : Type u} (f : bool → α) :
bool_to_equiv_prod α f = (f ff, f tt) := rfl
@[simp] lemma bool_to_equiv_prod_symm_apply_ff {α : Type u} (p : α × α) :
(bool_to_equiv_prod α).symm p ff = p.1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma bool_to_equiv_prod_symm_apply_tt {α : Type u} (p : α × α) :
(bool_to_equiv_prod α).symm p tt = p.2 := rfl
end
section
open sum nat
/-- The set of natural numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ punit`. -/
def nat_equiv_nat_sum_punit : ℕ ≃ ℕ ⊕ punit.{u+1} :=
⟨λ n, match n with zero := inr punit.star | succ a := inl a end,
λ s, match s with inl n := succ n | inr punit.star := zero end,
λ n, begin cases n, repeat { refl } end,
λ s, begin cases s with a u, { refl }, {cases u, { refl }} end⟩
/-- `ℕ ⊕ punit` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def nat_sum_punit_equiv_nat : ℕ ⊕ punit.{u+1} ≃ ℕ :=
nat_equiv_nat_sum_punit.symm
/-- The type of integer numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ ℕ`. -/
def int_equiv_nat_sum_nat : ℤ ≃ ℕ ⊕ ℕ :=
by refine ⟨_, _, _, _⟩; intro z; {cases z; [left, right]; assumption} <|> {cases z; refl}
end
/-- An equivalence between `α` and `β` generates an equivalence between `list α` and `list β`. -/
def list_equiv_of_equiv {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) : list α ≃ list β :=
{ to_fun := list.map e,
inv_fun := list.map e.symm,
left_inv := λ l, by rw [list.map_map, e.symm_comp_self, list.map_id],
right_inv := λ l, by rw [list.map_map, e.self_comp_symm, list.map_id] }
/-- `fin n` is equivalent to `{m // m < n}`. -/
def fin_equiv_subtype (n : ℕ) : fin n ≃ {m // m < n} :=
⟨λ x, ⟨x.1, x.2⟩, λ x, ⟨x.1, x.2⟩, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl,λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `unique α` is equivalent to `β`. -/
def unique_congr (e : α ≃ β) : unique α ≃ unique β :=
{ to_fun := λ h, @equiv.unique _ _ h e.symm,
inv_fun := λ h, @equiv.unique _ _ h e,
left_inv := λ _, subsingleton.elim _ _,
right_inv := λ _, subsingleton.elim _ _ }
section
open subtype
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and the predicates `p : α → Prop` and `q : β → Prop` are equivalent
at corresponding points, then `{a // p a}` is equivalent to `{b // q b}`.
For the statement where `α = β`, that is, `e : perm α`, see `perm.subtype_perm`. -/
def subtype_equiv {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) : {a : α // p a} ≃ {b : β // q b} :=
⟨λ x, ⟨e x, (h _).1 x.2⟩,
λ y, ⟨e.symm y, (h _).2 (by { simp, exact y.2 })⟩,
λ ⟨x, h⟩, subtype.ext_val $ by simp,
λ ⟨y, h⟩, subtype.ext_val $ by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma subtype_equiv_refl {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∀ a, p a ↔ p (equiv.refl _ a) := λ a, iff.rfl) :
(equiv.refl α).subtype_equiv h = equiv.refl {a : α // p a} :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma subtype_equiv_symm {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β)
(h : ∀ (a : α), p a ↔ q (e a)) :
(e.subtype_equiv h).symm = e.symm.subtype_equiv (λ a, by {
convert (h $ e.symm a).symm,
exact (e.apply_symm_apply a).symm,
}) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_equiv_trans {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop}
(e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ)
(h : ∀ (a : α), p a ↔ q (e a)) (h' : ∀ (b : β), q b ↔ r (f b)):
(e.subtype_equiv h).trans (f.subtype_equiv h') =
(e.trans f).subtype_equiv (λ a, (h a).trans (h' $ e a)) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_equiv_apply {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β)
(h : ∀ (a : α), p a ↔ q (e a)) (x : {x // p x}) :
e.subtype_equiv h x = ⟨e x, (h _).1 x.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- If two predicates `p` and `q` are pointwise equivalent, then `{x // p x}` is equivalent to
`{x // q x}`. -/
@[simps]
def subtype_equiv_right {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀x, p x ↔ q x) : {x // p x} ≃ {x // q x} :=
subtype_equiv (equiv.refl _) e
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : β → Prop` the subtype `{a // p (e a)}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p b}`. -/
def subtype_equiv_of_subtype {p : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
{a : α // p (e a)} ≃ {b : β // p b} :=
subtype_equiv e $ by simp
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : α → Prop` the subtype `{a // p a}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p (e.symm b)}`. This version is used by `equiv_rw`. -/
def subtype_equiv_of_subtype' {p : α → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
{a : α // p a} ≃ {b : β // p (e.symm b)} :=
e.symm.subtype_equiv_of_subtype.symm
/-- If two predicates are equal, then the corresponding subtypes are equivalent. -/
def subtype_equiv_prop {α : Type*} {p q : α → Prop} (h : p = q) : subtype p ≃ subtype q :=
subtype_equiv (equiv.refl α) (assume a, h ▸ iff.rfl)
/-- The subtypes corresponding to equal sets are equivalent. -/
@[simps apply]
def set_congr {α : Type*} {s t : set α} (h : s = t) : s ≃ t :=
subtype_equiv_prop h
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. This
version allows the “inner” predicate to depend on `h : p a`. -/
def subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (q : subtype p → Prop) :
subtype q ≃ {a : α // ∃h:p a, q ⟨a, h⟩ } :=
⟨λ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ha'⟩, ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩,
λ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha.cases_on $ assume h _, h⟩, by { cases ha, exact ha_h }⟩,
assume ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, h⟩, rfl, assume ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists_apply {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop)
(q : subtype p → Prop) (a) : (subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists p q a : α) = a :=
by { cases a, cases a_val, refl }
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. -/
def subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter {α : Type u} (p q : α → Prop) :
{x : subtype p // q x.1} ≃ subtype (λ x, p x ∧ q x) :=
(subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists p _).trans $
subtype_equiv_right $ λ x, exists_prop
@[simp] lemma subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter_apply {α : Type u} (p q : α → Prop) (a) :
(subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter p q a : α) = a :=
by { cases a, cases a_val, refl }
/-- If the outer subtype has more restrictive predicate than the inner one,
then we can drop the latter. -/
def subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ {x}, q x → p x) :
{x : subtype p // q x.1} ≃ subtype q :=
(subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter p _).trans $
subtype_equiv_right $
assume x,
⟨and.right, λ h₁, ⟨h h₁, h₁⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_apply {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, q x → p x)
(a : {x : subtype p // q x.1}) :
(subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype h a : α) = a :=
by { cases a, cases a_val, refl }
/-- If a proposition holds for all elements, then the subtype is
equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def subtype_univ_equiv {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
subtype p ≃ α :=
⟨λ x, x, λ x, ⟨x, h x⟩, λ x, subtype.eq rfl, λ x, rfl⟩
/-- A subtype of a sigma-type is a sigma-type over a subtype. -/
def subtype_sigma_equiv {α : Type u} (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) :
{ y : sigma p // q y.1 } ≃ Σ(x : subtype q), p x.1 :=
⟨λ x, ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩,
λ x, ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩,
λ ⟨⟨x, h⟩, y⟩, rfl,
λ ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A sigma type over a subtype is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty outside of the subset -/
def sigma_subtype_equiv_of_subset {α : Type u} (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(Σ x : subtype q, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p x :=
(subtype_sigma_equiv p q).symm.trans $ subtype_univ_equiv $ λ x, h x.1 x.2
/-- If a predicate `p : β → Prop` is true on the range of a map `f : α → β`, then
`Σ y : {y // p y}, {x // f x = y}` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def sigma_subtype_preimage_equiv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (p : β → Prop)
(h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
(Σ y : subtype p, {x : α // f x = y}) ≃ α :=
calc _ ≃ Σ y : β, {x : α // f x = y} : sigma_subtype_equiv_of_subset _ p (λ y ⟨x, h'⟩, h' ▸ h x)
... ≃ α : sigma_preimage_equiv f
/-- If for each `x` we have `p x ↔ q (f x)`, then `Σ y : {y // q y}, f ⁻¹' {y}` is equivalent
to `{x // p x}`. -/
def sigma_subtype_preimage_equiv_subtype {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β)
{p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (f x)) :
(Σ y : subtype q, {x : α // f x = y}) ≃ subtype p :=
calc (Σ y : subtype q, {x : α // f x = y}) ≃
Σ y : subtype q, {x : subtype p // subtype.mk (f x) ((h x).1 x.2) = y} :
begin
apply sigma_congr_right,
assume y,
symmetry,
refine (subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists _ _).trans (subtype_equiv_right _),
assume x,
exact ⟨λ ⟨hp, h'⟩, congr_arg subtype.val h', λ h', ⟨(h x).2 (h'.symm ▸ y.2), subtype.eq h'⟩⟩
end
... ≃ subtype p : sigma_preimage_equiv (λ x : subtype p, (⟨f x, (h x).1 x.property⟩ : subtype q))
/-- The `pi`-type `Π i, π i` is equivalent to the type of sections `f : ι → Σ i, π i` of the
`sigma` type such that for all `i` we have `(f i).fst = i`. -/
def pi_equiv_subtype_sigma (ι : Type*) (π : ι → Type*) :
(Πi, π i) ≃ {f : ι → Σi, π i | ∀i, (f i).1 = i } :=
⟨ λf, ⟨λi, ⟨i, f i⟩, assume i, rfl⟩, λf i, begin rw ← f.2 i, exact (f.1 i).2 end,
assume f, funext $ assume i, rfl,
assume ⟨f, hf⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume i, sigma.eq (hf i).symm $
eq_of_heq $ rec_heq_of_heq _ $ rec_heq_of_heq _ $ heq.refl _⟩
/-- The set of functions `f : Π a, β a` such that for all `a` we have `p a (f a)` is equivalent
to the set of functions `Π a, {b : β a // p a b}`. -/
def subtype_pi_equiv_pi {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {p : Πa, β a → Prop} :
{f : Πa, β a // ∀a, p a (f a) } ≃ Πa, { b : β a // p a b } :=
⟨λf a, ⟨f.1 a, f.2 a⟩, λf, ⟨λa, (f a).1, λa, (f a).2⟩,
by { rintro ⟨f, h⟩, refl },
by { rintro f, funext a, exact subtype.ext_val rfl }⟩
/-- A subtype of a product defined by componentwise conditions
is equivalent to a product of subtypes. -/
def subtype_prod_equiv_prod {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
{c : α × β // p c.1 ∧ q c.2} ≃ ({a // p a} × {b // q b}) :=
⟨λ x, ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2.1⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩,
λ x, ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2.1⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩,
λ ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, rfl,
λ ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, rfl⟩
end
section subtype_equiv_codomain
variables {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [decidable_eq X] {x : X}
/-- The type of all functions `X → Y` with prescribed values for all `x' ≠ x`
is equivalent to the codomain `Y`. -/
def subtype_equiv_codomain (f : {x' // x' ≠ x} → Y) : {g : X → Y // g ∘ coe = f} ≃ Y :=
(subtype_preimage _ f).trans $
@fun_unique {x' // ¬ x' ≠ x} _ $
show unique {x' // ¬ x' ≠ x}, from @equiv.unique _ _
(show unique {x' // x' = x}, from
{ default := ⟨x, rfl⟩, uniq := λ ⟨x', h⟩, subtype.val_injective h })
(subtype_equiv_right $ λ a, not_not)
@[simp] lemma coe_subtype_equiv_codomain (f : {x' // x' ≠ x} → Y) :
(subtype_equiv_codomain f : {g : X → Y // g ∘ coe = f} → Y) = λ g, (g : X → Y) x := rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_equiv_codomain_apply (f : {x' // x' ≠ x} → Y)
(g : {g : X → Y // g ∘ coe = f}) :
subtype_equiv_codomain f g = (g : X → Y) x := rfl
lemma coe_subtype_equiv_codomain_symm (f : {x' // x' ≠ x} → Y) :
((subtype_equiv_codomain f).symm : Y → {g : X → Y // g ∘ coe = f}) =
λ y, ⟨λ x', if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y,
by { funext x', dsimp, erw [dif_pos x'.2, subtype.coe_eta] }⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply (f : {x' // x' ≠ x} → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) :
((subtype_equiv_codomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply_eq (f : {x' // x' ≠ x} → Y) (y : Y) :
((subtype_equiv_codomain f).symm y : X → Y) x = y :=
dif_neg (not_not.mpr rfl)
lemma subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply_ne (f : {x' // x' ≠ x} → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) (h : x' ≠ x) :
((subtype_equiv_codomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = f ⟨x', h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
end subtype_equiv_codomain
/--
A set is equivalent to its image under an equivalence.
-/
-- We could construct this using `equiv.set.image e s e.injective`,
-- but this definition provides an explicit inverse.
@[simps]
def image {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) (s : set α) : s ≃ e '' s :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨e x.1, by simp⟩,
inv_fun := λ y, ⟨e.symm y.1, by { rcases y with ⟨-, ⟨a, ⟨m, rfl⟩⟩⟩, simpa using m, }⟩,
left_inv := λ x, by simp,
right_inv := λ y, by simp, }.
namespace set
open set
/-- `univ α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
protected def univ (α) : @univ α ≃ α :=
⟨coe, λ a, ⟨a, trivial⟩, λ ⟨a, _⟩, rfl, λ a, rfl⟩
/-- An empty set is equivalent to the `empty` type. -/
protected def empty (α) : (∅ : set α) ≃ empty :=
equiv_empty $ λ ⟨x, h⟩, not_mem_empty x h
/-- An empty set is equivalent to a `pempty` type. -/
protected def pempty (α) : (∅ : set α) ≃ pempty :=
equiv_pempty $ λ ⟨x, h⟩, not_mem_empty x h
/-- If sets `s` and `t` are separated by a decidable predicate, then `s ∪ t` is equivalent to
`s ⊕ t`. -/
protected def union' {α} {s t : set α}
(p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(ht : ∀ x ∈ t, ¬ p x) : (s ∪ t : set α) ≃ s ⊕ t :=
{ to_fun := λ x, if hp : p x
then sum.inl ⟨_, x.2.resolve_right (λ xt, ht _ xt hp)⟩
else sum.inr ⟨_, x.2.resolve_left (λ xs, hp (hs _ xs))⟩,
inv_fun := λ o, match o with
| (sum.inl x) := ⟨x, or.inl x.2⟩
| (sum.inr x) := ⟨x, or.inr x.2⟩
end,
left_inv := λ ⟨x, h'⟩, by by_cases p x; simp [union'._match_1, h]; congr,
right_inv := λ o, begin
rcases o with ⟨x, h⟩ | ⟨x, h⟩;
dsimp [union'._match_1];
[simp [hs _ h], simp [ht _ h]]
end }
/-- If sets `s` and `t` are disjoint, then `s ∪ t` is equivalent to `s ⊕ t`. -/
protected def union {α} {s t : set α} [decidable_pred (λ x, x ∈ s)] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) :
(s ∪ t : set α) ≃ s ⊕ t :=
set.union' (λ x, x ∈ s) (λ _, id) (λ x xt xs, H ⟨xs, xt⟩)
lemma union_apply_left {α} {s t : set α} [decidable_pred (λ x, x ∈ s)] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅)
{a : (s ∪ t : set α)} (ha : ↑a ∈ s) : equiv.set.union H a = sum.inl ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
dif_pos ha
lemma union_apply_right {α} {s t : set α} [decidable_pred (λ x, x ∈ s)] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅)
{a : (s ∪ t : set α)} (ha : ↑a ∈ t) : equiv.set.union H a = sum.inr ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
dif_neg $ λ h, H ⟨h, ha⟩
@[simp] lemma union_symm_apply_left {α} {s t : set α} [decidable_pred (λ x, x ∈ s)] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅)
(a : s) : (equiv.set.union H).symm (sum.inl a) = ⟨a, subset_union_left _ _ a.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma union_symm_apply_right {α} {s t : set α} [decidable_pred (λ x, x ∈ s)] (H : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅)
(a : t) : (equiv.set.union H).symm (sum.inr a) = ⟨a, subset_union_right _ _ a.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- A singleton set is equivalent to a `punit` type. -/
protected def singleton {α} (a : α) : ({a} : set α) ≃ punit.{u} :=
⟨λ _, punit.star, λ _, ⟨a, mem_singleton _⟩,
λ ⟨x, h⟩, by { simp at h, subst x },
λ ⟨⟩, rfl⟩
/-- Equal sets are equivalent. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
protected def of_eq {α : Type u} {s t : set α} (h : s = t) : s ≃ t :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨x, h ▸ x.2⟩,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, h.symm ▸ x.2⟩,
left_inv := λ _, subtype.eq rfl,
right_inv := λ _, subtype.eq rfl }
/-- If `a ∉ s`, then `insert a s` is equivalent to `s ⊕ punit`. -/
protected def insert {α} {s : set.{u} α} [decidable_pred s] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s) :
(insert a s : set α) ≃ s ⊕ punit.{u+1} :=
calc (insert a s : set α) ≃ ↥(s ∪ {a}) : equiv.set.of_eq (by simp)
... ≃ s ⊕ ({a} : set α) : equiv.set.union (by finish [set.subset_def])
... ≃ s ⊕ punit.{u+1} : sum_congr (equiv.refl _) (equiv.set.singleton _)
@[simp] lemma insert_symm_apply_inl {α} {s : set.{u} α} [decidable_pred s] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s)
(b : s) : (equiv.set.insert H).symm (sum.inl b) = ⟨b, or.inr b.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma insert_symm_apply_inr {α} {s : set.{u} α} [decidable_pred s] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s)
(b : punit.{u+1}) : (equiv.set.insert H).symm (sum.inr b) = ⟨a, or.inl rfl⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma insert_apply_left {α} {s : set.{u} α} [decidable_pred s] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s) :
equiv.set.insert H ⟨a, or.inl rfl⟩ = sum.inr punit.star :=
(equiv.set.insert H).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.2 rfl
@[simp] lemma insert_apply_right {α} {s : set.{u} α} [decidable_pred s] {a : α} (H : a ∉ s)
(b : s) : equiv.set.insert H ⟨b, or.inr b.2⟩ = sum.inl b :=
(equiv.set.insert H).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.2 rfl
/-- If `s : set α` is a set with decidable membership, then `s ⊕ sᶜ` is equivalent to `α`. -/
protected def sum_compl {α} (s : set α) [decidable_pred s] : s ⊕ (sᶜ : set α) ≃ α :=
calc s ⊕ (sᶜ : set α) ≃ ↥(s ∪ sᶜ) : (equiv.set.union (by simp [set.ext_iff])).symm
... ≃ @univ α : equiv.set.of_eq (by simp)
... ≃ α : equiv.set.univ _
@[simp] lemma sum_compl_apply_inl {α : Type u} (s : set α) [decidable_pred s] (x : s) :
equiv.set.sum_compl s (sum.inl x) = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_compl_apply_inr {α : Type u} (s : set α) [decidable_pred s] (x : sᶜ) :
equiv.set.sum_compl s (sum.inr x) = x := rfl
lemma sum_compl_symm_apply_of_mem {α : Type u} {s : set α} [decidable_pred s] {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ s) : (equiv.set.sum_compl s).symm x = sum.inl ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
have ↑(⟨x, or.inl hx⟩ : (s ∪ sᶜ : set α)) ∈ s, from hx,
by { rw [equiv.set.sum_compl], simpa using set.union_apply_left _ this }
lemma sum_compl_symm_apply_of_not_mem {α : Type u} {s : set α} [decidable_pred s] {x : α}
(hx : x ∉ s) : (equiv.set.sum_compl s).symm x = sum.inr ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
have ↑(⟨x, or.inr hx⟩ : (s ∪ sᶜ : set α)) ∈ sᶜ, from hx,
by { rw [equiv.set.sum_compl], simpa using set.union_apply_right _ this }
@[simp] lemma sum_compl_symm_apply {α : Type*} {s : set α} [decidable_pred s] {x : s} :
(equiv.set.sum_compl s).symm x = sum.inl x :=
by cases x with x hx; exact set.sum_compl_symm_apply_of_mem hx
@[simp] lemma sum_compl_symm_apply_compl {α : Type*} {s : set α}
[decidable_pred s] {x : sᶜ} : (equiv.set.sum_compl s).symm x = sum.inr x :=
by cases x with x hx; exact set.sum_compl_symm_apply_of_not_mem hx
/-- `sum_diff_subset s t` is the natural equivalence between
`s ⊕ (t \ s)` and `t`, where `s` and `t` are two sets. -/
protected def sum_diff_subset {α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [decidable_pred s] :
s ⊕ (t \ s : set α) ≃ t :=
calc s ⊕ (t \ s : set α) ≃ (s ∪ (t \ s) : set α) :
(equiv.set.union (by simp [inter_diff_self])).symm
... ≃ t : equiv.set.of_eq (by { simp [union_diff_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_left h] })
@[simp] lemma sum_diff_subset_apply_inl
{α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [decidable_pred s] (x : s) :
equiv.set.sum_diff_subset h (sum.inl x) = inclusion h x := rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_diff_subset_apply_inr
{α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [decidable_pred s] (x : t \ s) :
equiv.set.sum_diff_subset h (sum.inr x) = inclusion (diff_subset t s) x := rfl
lemma sum_diff_subset_symm_apply_of_mem
{α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [decidable_pred s] {x : t} (hx : x.1 ∈ s) :
(equiv.set.sum_diff_subset h).symm x = sum.inl ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
begin
apply (equiv.set.sum_diff_subset h).injective,
simp only [apply_symm_apply, sum_diff_subset_apply_inl],
exact subtype.eq rfl,
end
lemma sum_diff_subset_symm_apply_of_not_mem
{α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) [decidable_pred s] {x : t} (hx : x.1 ∉ s) :
(equiv.set.sum_diff_subset h).symm x = sum.inr ⟨x, ⟨x.2, hx⟩⟩ :=
begin
apply (equiv.set.sum_diff_subset h).injective,
simp only [apply_symm_apply, sum_diff_subset_apply_inr],
exact subtype.eq rfl,
end
/-- If `s` is a set with decidable membership, then the sum of `s ∪ t` and `s ∩ t` is equivalent
to `s ⊕ t`. -/
protected def union_sum_inter {α : Type u} (s t : set α) [decidable_pred s] :
(s ∪ t : set α) ⊕ (s ∩ t : set α) ≃ s ⊕ t :=
calc (s ∪ t : set α) ⊕ (s ∩ t : set α)
≃ (s ∪ t \ s : set α) ⊕ (s ∩ t : set α) : by rw [union_diff_self]
... ≃ (s ⊕ (t \ s : set α)) ⊕ (s ∩ t : set α) :
sum_congr (set.union $ subset_empty_iff.2 (inter_diff_self _ _)) (equiv.refl _)
... ≃ s ⊕ (t \ s : set α) ⊕ (s ∩ t : set α) : sum_assoc _ _ _
... ≃ s ⊕ (t \ s ∪ s ∩ t : set α) : sum_congr (equiv.refl _) begin
refine (set.union' (∉ s) _ _).symm,
exacts [λ x hx, hx.2, λ x hx, not_not_intro hx.1]
end
... ≃ s ⊕ t : by { rw (_ : t \ s ∪ s ∩ t = t), rw [union_comm, inter_comm, inter_union_diff] }
/-- Given an equivalence `e₀` between sets `s : set α` and `t : set β`, the set of equivalences
`e : α ≃ β` such that `e ↑x = ↑(e₀ x)` for each `x : s` is equivalent to the set of equivalences
between `sᶜ` and `tᶜ`. -/
protected def compl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {s : set α} {t : set β} [decidable_pred s]
[decidable_pred t] (e₀ : s ≃ t) :
{e : α ≃ β // ∀ x : s, e x = e₀ x} ≃ ((sᶜ : set α) ≃ (tᶜ : set β)) :=
{ to_fun := λ e, subtype_equiv e
(λ a, not_congr $ iff.symm $ maps_to.mem_iff
(maps_to_iff_exists_map_subtype.2 ⟨e₀, e.2⟩)
(surj_on.maps_to_compl (surj_on_iff_exists_map_subtype.2
⟨t, e₀, subset.refl t, e₀.surjective, e.2⟩) e.1.injective)),
inv_fun := λ e₁,
subtype.mk
(calc α ≃ s ⊕ (sᶜ : set α) : (set.sum_compl s).symm
... ≃ t ⊕ (tᶜ : set β) : e₀.sum_congr e₁
... ≃ β : set.sum_compl t)
(λ x, by simp only [sum.map_inl, trans_apply, sum_congr_apply,
set.sum_compl_apply_inl, set.sum_compl_symm_apply]),
left_inv := λ e,
begin
ext x,
by_cases hx : x ∈ s,
{ simp only [set.sum_compl_symm_apply_of_mem hx, ←e.prop ⟨x, hx⟩,
sum.map_inl, sum_congr_apply, trans_apply,
subtype.coe_mk, set.sum_compl_apply_inl] },
{ simp only [set.sum_compl_symm_apply_of_not_mem hx, sum.map_inr,
subtype_equiv_apply, set.sum_compl_apply_inr, trans_apply,
sum_congr_apply, subtype.coe_mk] },
end,
right_inv := λ e, equiv.ext $ λ x, by simp only [sum.map_inr, subtype_equiv_apply,
set.sum_compl_apply_inr, function.comp_app, sum_congr_apply, equiv.coe_trans,
subtype.coe_eta, subtype.coe_mk, set.sum_compl_symm_apply_compl] }
/-- The set product of two sets is equivalent to the type product of their coercions to types. -/
protected def prod {α β} (s : set α) (t : set β) :
s.prod t ≃ s × t :=
@subtype_prod_equiv_prod α β s t
/-- If a function `f` is injective on a set `s`, then `s` is equivalent to `f '' s`. -/
protected noncomputable def image_of_inj_on {α β} (f : α → β) (s : set α) (H : inj_on f s) :
s ≃ (f '' s) :=
⟨λ p, ⟨f p, mem_image_of_mem f p.2⟩,
λ p, ⟨classical.some p.2, (classical.some_spec p.2).1⟩,
λ ⟨x, h⟩, subtype.eq (H (classical.some_spec (mem_image_of_mem f h)).1 h
(classical.some_spec (mem_image_of_mem f h)).2),
λ ⟨y, h⟩, subtype.eq (classical.some_spec h).2⟩
/-- If `f` is an injective function, then `s` is equivalent to `f '' s`. -/
@[simps apply]
protected noncomputable def image {α β} (f : α → β) (s : set α) (H : injective f) : s ≃ (f '' s) :=
equiv.set.image_of_inj_on f s (H.inj_on s)
lemma image_symm_preimage {α β} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) (u s : set α) :
(λ x, (set.image f s hf).symm x : f '' s → α) ⁻¹' u = coe ⁻¹' (f '' u) :=
begin
ext ⟨b, a, has, rfl⟩,
have : ∀(h : ∃a', a' ∈ s ∧ a' = a), classical.some h = a := λ h, (classical.some_spec h).2,
simp [equiv.set.image, equiv.set.image_of_inj_on, hf.eq_iff, this],
end
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `set α` is equivalent to `set β`. -/
@[simps]
protected def congr {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) : set α ≃ set β :=
⟨λ s, e '' s, λ t, e.symm '' t, symm_image_image e, symm_image_image e.symm⟩
/-- The set `{x ∈ s | t x}` is equivalent to the set of `x : s` such that `t x`. -/
protected def sep {α : Type u} (s : set α) (t : α → Prop) :
({ x ∈ s | t x } : set α) ≃ { x : s | t x } :=
(equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter s t).symm
/-- The set `𝒫 S := {x | x ⊆ S}` is equivalent to the type `set S`. -/
protected def powerset {α} (S : set α) : 𝒫 S ≃ set S :=
{ to_fun := λ x : 𝒫 S, coe ⁻¹' (x : set α),
inv_fun := λ x : set S, ⟨coe '' x, by rintro _ ⟨a : S, _, rfl⟩; exact a.2⟩,
left_inv := λ x, by ext y; exact ⟨λ ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h, rfl⟩, h, λ h, ⟨⟨_, x.2 h⟩, h, rfl⟩⟩,
right_inv := λ x, by ext; simp }
end set
/-- If `f : α → β` has a left-inverse when `α` is nonempty, then `α` is computably equivalent to the
range of `f`.
While awkward, the `nonempty α` hypothesis on `f_inv` and `hf` allows this to be used when `α` is
empty too. This hypothesis is absent on analogous definitions on stronger `equiv`s like
`linear_equiv.of_left_inverse` and `ring_equiv.of_left_inverse` as their typeclass assumptions
are already sufficient to ensure non-emptiness. -/
@[simps]
def of_left_inverse {α β : Sort*}
(f : α → β) (f_inv : nonempty α → β → α) (hf : Π h : nonempty α, left_inverse (f_inv h) f) :
α ≃ set.range f :=
{ to_fun := λ a, ⟨f a, a, rfl⟩,
inv_fun := λ b, f_inv (nonempty_of_exists b.2) b,
left_inv := λ a, hf ⟨a⟩ a,
right_inv := λ ⟨b, a, ha⟩, subtype.eq $ show f (f_inv ⟨a⟩ b) = b,
from eq.trans (congr_arg f $ by exact ha ▸ (hf _ a)) ha }
/-- If `f : α → β` has a left-inverse, then `α` is computably equivalent to the range of `f`.
Note that if `α` is empty, no such `f_inv` exists and so this definition can't be used, unlike
the stronger but less convenient `of_left_inverse`. -/
abbreviation of_left_inverse' {α β : Sort*}
(f : α → β) (f_inv : β → α) (hf : left_inverse f_inv f) :
α ≃ set.range f :=
of_left_inverse f (λ _, f_inv) (λ _, hf)
/-- If `f : α → β` is an injective function, then domain `α` is equivalent to the range of `f`. -/
@[simps apply]
noncomputable def of_injective {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : injective f) : α ≃ set.range f :=
equiv.of_left_inverse f
(λ h, by exactI function.inv_fun f) (λ h, by exactI function.left_inverse_inv_fun hf)
theorem apply_of_injective_symm {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : injective f) (b : set.range f) :
f ((of_injective f hf).symm b) = b :=
subtype.ext_iff.1 $ (of_injective f hf).apply_symm_apply b
lemma of_left_inverse_eq_of_injective {α β : Type*}
(f : α → β) (f_inv : nonempty α → β → α) (hf : Π h : nonempty α, left_inverse (f_inv h) f) :
of_left_inverse f f_inv hf = of_injective f
((em (nonempty α)).elim (λ h, (hf h).injective) (λ h _ _ _, by {
haveI : subsingleton α := subsingleton_of_not_nonempty h, simp })) :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma of_left_inverse'_eq_of_injective {α β : Type*}
(f : α → β) (f_inv : β → α) (hf : left_inverse f_inv f) :
of_left_inverse' f f_inv hf = of_injective f hf.injective :=
by { ext, simp }
/-- If `f` is a bijective function, then its domain is equivalent to its codomain. -/
@[simps apply]
noncomputable def of_bijective {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : bijective f) : α ≃ β :=
(of_injective f hf.1).trans $ (set_congr hf.2.range_eq).trans $ equiv.set.univ β
lemma of_bijective_apply_symm_apply {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : bijective f) (x : β) :
f ((of_bijective f hf).symm x) = x :=
(of_bijective f hf).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp] lemma of_bijective_symm_apply_apply {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : bijective f) (x : α) :
(of_bijective f hf).symm (f x) = x :=
(of_bijective f hf).symm_apply_apply x
section
variables {α' β' : Type*} (e : perm α') {p : β' → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(f : α' ≃ subtype p)
/--
Extend the domain of `e : equiv.perm α` to one that is over `β` via `f : α → subtype p`,
where `p : β → Prop`, permuting only the `b : β` that satisfy `p b`.
This can be used to extend the domain across a function `f : α → β`,
keeping everything outside of `set.range f` fixed. For this use-case `equiv` given by `f` can
be constructed by `equiv.of_left_inverse'` or `equiv.of_left_inverse` when there is a known
inverse, or `equiv.of_injective` in the general case.`.
-/
def perm.extend_domain : perm β' :=
(perm_congr f e).subtype_congr (equiv.refl _)
@[simp] lemma perm.extend_domain_apply_image (a : α') :
e.extend_domain f (f a) = f (e a) :=
by simp [perm.extend_domain]
lemma perm.extend_domain_apply_subtype {b : β'} (h : p b) :
e.extend_domain f b = f (e (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩)) :=
by simp [perm.extend_domain, h]
lemma perm.extend_domain_apply_not_subtype {b : β'} (h : ¬ p b) :
e.extend_domain f b = b :=
by simp [perm.extend_domain, h]
@[simp] lemma perm.extend_domain_refl : perm.extend_domain (equiv.refl _) f = equiv.refl _ :=
by simp [perm.extend_domain]
@[simp] lemma perm.extend_domain_symm :
(e.extend_domain f).symm = perm.extend_domain e.symm f := rfl
lemma perm.extend_domain_trans (e e' : perm α') :
(e.extend_domain f).trans (e'.extend_domain f) = perm.extend_domain (e.trans e') f :=
by simp [perm.extend_domain, perm_congr_trans]
end
/-- Subtype of the quotient is equivalent to the quotient of the subtype. Let `α` be a setoid with
equivalence relation `~`. Let `p₂` be a predicate on the quotient type `α/~`, and `p₁` be the lift
of this predicate to `α`: `p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧`. Let `~₂` be the restriction of `~` to `{x // p₁ x}`.
Then `{x // p₂ x}` is equivalent to the quotient of `{x // p₁ x}` by `~₂`. -/
def subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype (p₁ : α → Prop) [s₁ : setoid α]
[s₂ : setoid (subtype p₁)] (p₂ : quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : subtype p₁, @setoid.r _ s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y) :
{x // p₂ x} ≃ quotient s₂ :=
{ to_fun := λ a, quotient.hrec_on a.1 (λ a h, ⟦⟨a, (hp₂ _).2 h⟩⟧)
(λ a b hab, hfunext (by rw quotient.sound hab)
(λ h₁ h₂ _, heq_of_eq (quotient.sound ((h _ _).2 hab)))) a.2,
inv_fun := λ a, quotient.lift_on a (λ a, (⟨⟦a.1⟧, (hp₂ _).1 a.2⟩ : {x // p₂ x}))
(λ a b hab, subtype.ext_val (quotient.sound ((h _ _).1 hab))),
left_inv := λ ⟨a, ha⟩, quotient.induction_on a (λ a ha, rfl) ha,
right_inv := λ a, quotient.induction_on a (λ ⟨a, ha⟩, rfl) }
section swap
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- A helper function for `equiv.swap`. -/
def swap_core (a b r : α) : α :=
if r = a then b
else if r = b then a
else r
theorem swap_core_self (r a : α) : swap_core a a r = r :=
by { unfold swap_core, split_ifs; cc }
theorem swap_core_swap_core (r a b : α) : swap_core a b (swap_core a b r) = r :=
by { unfold swap_core, split_ifs; cc }
theorem swap_core_comm (r a b : α) : swap_core a b r = swap_core b a r :=
by { unfold swap_core, split_ifs; cc }
/-- `swap a b` is the permutation that swaps `a` and `b` and
leaves other values as is. -/
def swap (a b : α) : perm α :=
⟨swap_core a b, swap_core a b, λr, swap_core_swap_core r a b, λr, swap_core_swap_core r a b⟩
@[simp] theorem swap_self (a : α) : swap a a = equiv.refl _ :=
ext $ λ r, swap_core_self r a
theorem swap_comm (a b : α) : swap a b = swap b a :=
ext $ λ r, swap_core_comm r _ _
theorem swap_apply_def (a b x : α) : swap a b x = if x = a then b else if x = b then a else x :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem swap_apply_left (a b : α) : swap a b a = b :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem swap_apply_right (a b : α) : swap a b b = a :=
by { by_cases h : b = a; simp [swap_apply_def, h], }
theorem swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne {a b x : α} : x ≠ a → x ≠ b → swap a b x = x :=
by simp [swap_apply_def] {contextual := tt}
@[simp] theorem swap_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).trans (swap a b) = equiv.refl _ :=
ext $ λ x, swap_core_swap_core _ _ _
@[simp] lemma symm_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).symm = swap a b := rfl
@[simp] lemma swap_eq_refl_iff {x y : α} : swap x y = equiv.refl _ ↔ x = y :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, (equiv.refl _).injective _, λ h, h ▸ (swap_self _)⟩,
rw [←h, swap_apply_left, h, refl_apply]
end
theorem swap_comp_apply {a b x : α} (π : perm α) :
π.trans (swap a b) x = if π x = a then b else if π x = b then a else π x :=
by { cases π, refl }
lemma swap_eq_update (i j : α) :
⇑(equiv.swap i j) = update (update id j i) i j :=
funext $ λ x, by rw [update_apply _ i j, update_apply _ j i, equiv.swap_apply_def, id.def]
lemma comp_swap_eq_update (i j : α) (f : α → β) :
f ∘ equiv.swap i j = update (update f j (f i)) i (f j) :=
by rw [swap_eq_update, comp_update, comp_update, comp.right_id]
@[simp] lemma symm_trans_swap_trans [decidable_eq β] (a b : α) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.symm.trans (swap a b)).trans e = swap (e a) (e b) :=
equiv.ext (λ x, begin
have : ∀ a, e.symm x = a ↔ x = e a :=
λ a, by { rw @eq_comm _ (e.symm x), split; intros; simp * at * },
simp [swap_apply_def, this],
split_ifs; simp
end)
@[simp] lemma trans_swap_trans_symm [decidable_eq β] (a b : β)
(e : α ≃ β) : (e.trans (swap a b)).trans e.symm = swap (e.symm a) (e.symm b) :=
symm_trans_swap_trans a b e.symm
@[simp] lemma swap_apply_self (i j a : α) :
swap i j (swap i j a) = a :=
by rw [← equiv.trans_apply, equiv.swap_swap, equiv.refl_apply]
/-- A function is invariant to a swap if it is equal at both elements -/
lemma apply_swap_eq_self {v : α → β} {i j : α} (hv : v i = v j) (k : α) : v (swap i j k) = v k :=
begin
by_cases hi : k = i, { rw [hi, swap_apply_left, hv] },
by_cases hj : k = j, { rw [hj, swap_apply_right, hv] },
rw swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hi hj,
end
lemma swap_apply_eq_iff {x y z w : α} :
swap x y z = w ↔ z = swap x y w :=
by rw [apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, symm_swap]
namespace perm
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_swap_refl {α β : Sort*} [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (i j : α) :
equiv.perm.sum_congr (equiv.swap i j) (equiv.refl β) = equiv.swap (sum.inl i) (sum.inl j) :=
begin
ext x,
cases x,
{ simp [sum.map, swap_apply_def],
split_ifs; refl},
{ simp [sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] },
end
@[simp] lemma sum_congr_refl_swap {α β : Sort*} [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (i j : β) :
equiv.perm.sum_congr (equiv.refl α) (equiv.swap i j) = equiv.swap (sum.inr i) (sum.inr j) :=
begin
ext x,
cases x,
{ simp [sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] },
{ simp [sum.map, swap_apply_def],
split_ifs; refl},
end
end perm
/-- Augment an equivalence with a prescribed mapping `f a = b` -/
def set_value (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : α ≃ β :=
(swap a (f.symm b)).trans f
@[simp] theorem set_value_eq (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : set_value f a b a = b :=
by { dsimp [set_value], simp [swap_apply_left] }
end swap
end equiv
lemma function.injective.map_swap {α β : Type*} [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
{f : α → β} (hf : function.injective f) (x y z : α) :
f (equiv.swap x y z) = equiv.swap (f x) (f y) (f z) :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw equiv.swap_apply_def },
split_ifs with h₁ h₂,
{ rw [hf h₁, equiv.swap_apply_left] },
{ rw [hf h₂, equiv.swap_apply_right] },
{ rw [equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (mt (congr_arg f) h₁) (mt (congr_arg f) h₂)] }
end
namespace equiv
protected lemma exists_unique_congr {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α ≃ β)
(h : ∀{x}, p x ↔ q (f x)) : (∃! x, p x) ↔ ∃! y, q y :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨f a, h.1 ha₁, λ b hb, f.symm_apply_eq.1 (ha₂ (f.symm b) (h.2 (by simpa using hb)))⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩,
exact ⟨f.symm b, h.2 (by simpa using hb₁), λ y hy, (eq_symm_apply f).2 (hb₂ _ (h.1 hy))⟩ }
end
protected lemma exists_unique_congr_left' {p : α → Prop} (f : α ≃ β) :
(∃! x, p x) ↔ (∃! y, p (f.symm y)) :=
equiv.exists_unique_congr f (λx, by simp)
protected lemma exists_unique_congr_left {p : β → Prop} (f : α ≃ β) :
(∃! x, p (f x)) ↔ (∃! y, p y) :=
(equiv.exists_unique_congr_left' f.symm).symm
protected lemma forall_congr {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α ≃ β)
(h : ∀{x}, p x ↔ q (f x)) : (∀x, p x) ↔ (∀y, q y) :=
begin
split; intros h₂ x,
{ rw [←f.right_inv x], apply h.mp, apply h₂ },
apply h.mpr, apply h₂
end
protected lemma forall_congr' {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α ≃ β)
(h : ∀{x}, p (f.symm x) ↔ q x) : (∀x, p x) ↔ (∀y, q y) :=
(equiv.forall_congr f.symm (λ x, h.symm)).symm
-- We next build some higher arity versions of `equiv.forall_congr`.
-- Although they appear to just be repeated applications of `equiv.forall_congr`,
-- unification of metavariables works better with these versions.
-- In particular, they are necessary in `equiv_rw`.
-- (Stopping at ternary functions seems reasonable: at least in 1-categorical mathematics,
-- it's rare to have axioms involving more than 3 elements at once.)
universes ua1 ua2 ub1 ub2 ug1 ug2
variables {α₁ : Sort ua1} {α₂ : Sort ua2}
{β₁ : Sort ub1} {β₂ : Sort ub2}
{γ₁ : Sort ug1} {γ₂ : Sort ug2}
protected lemma forall₂_congr {p : α₁ → β₁ → Prop} {q : α₂ → β₂ → Prop} (eα : α₁ ≃ α₂)
(eβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) (h : ∀{x y}, p x y ↔ q (eα x) (eβ y)) :
(∀x y, p x y) ↔ (∀x y, q x y) :=
begin
apply equiv.forall_congr,
intros,
apply equiv.forall_congr,
intros,
apply h,
end
protected lemma forall₂_congr' {p : α₁ → β₁ → Prop} {q : α₂ → β₂ → Prop} (eα : α₁ ≃ α₂)
(eβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) (h : ∀{x y}, p (eα.symm x) (eβ.symm y) ↔ q x y) :
(∀x y, p x y) ↔ (∀x y, q x y) :=
(equiv.forall₂_congr eα.symm eβ.symm (λ x y, h.symm)).symm
protected lemma forall₃_congr {p : α₁ → β₁ → γ₁ → Prop} {q : α₂ → β₂ → γ₂ → Prop}
(eα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) (eγ : γ₁ ≃ γ₂)
(h : ∀{x y z}, p x y z ↔ q (eα x) (eβ y) (eγ z)) : (∀x y z, p x y z) ↔ (∀x y z, q x y z) :=
begin
apply equiv.forall₂_congr,
intros,
apply equiv.forall_congr,
intros,
apply h,
end
protected lemma forall₃_congr' {p : α₁ → β₁ → γ₁ → Prop} {q : α₂ → β₂ → γ₂ → Prop}
(eα : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eβ : β₁ ≃ β₂) (eγ : γ₁ ≃ γ₂)
(h : ∀{x y z}, p (eα.symm x) (eβ.symm y) (eγ.symm z) ↔ q x y z) :
(∀x y z, p x y z) ↔ (∀x y z, q x y z) :=
(equiv.forall₃_congr eα.symm eβ.symm eγ.symm (λ x y z, h.symm)).symm
protected lemma forall_congr_left' {p : α → Prop} (f : α ≃ β) :
(∀x, p x) ↔ (∀y, p (f.symm y)) :=
equiv.forall_congr f (λx, by simp)
protected lemma forall_congr_left {p : β → Prop} (f : α ≃ β) :
(∀x, p (f x)) ↔ (∀y, p y) :=
(equiv.forall_congr_left' f.symm).symm
protected lemma exists_congr_left {α β} (f : α ≃ β) {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ a, p a) ↔ (∃ b, p (f.symm b)) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨f a, by simpa using h⟩, λ ⟨b, h⟩, ⟨_, h⟩⟩
protected lemma set_forall_iff {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {p : set α → Prop} :
(∀ a, p a) ↔ (∀ a, p (e ⁻¹' a)) :=
by simpa [equiv.image_eq_preimage] using (equiv.set.congr e).forall_congr_left'
protected lemma preimage_sUnion {α β} (f : α ≃ β) {s : set (set β)} :
f ⁻¹' (⋃₀ s) = ⋃₀ (_root_.set.image f ⁻¹' s) :=
by { ext x, simp [(equiv.set.congr f).symm.exists_congr_left] }
section
variables (P : α → Sort w) (e : α ≃ β)
/--
Transport dependent functions through an equivalence of the base space.
-/
@[simps] def Pi_congr_left' : (Π a, P a) ≃ (Π b, P (e.symm b)) :=
{ to_fun := λ f x, f (e.symm x),
inv_fun := λ f x, begin rw [← e.symm_apply_apply x], exact f (e x) end,
left_inv := λ f, funext $ λ x, eq_of_heq ((eq_rec_heq _ _).trans
(by { dsimp, rw e.symm_apply_apply })),
right_inv := λ f, funext $ λ x, eq_of_heq ((eq_rec_heq _ _).trans
(by { rw e.apply_symm_apply })) }
end
section
variables (P : β → Sort w) (e : α ≃ β)
/--
Transporting dependent functions through an equivalence of the base,
expressed as a "simplification".
-/
def Pi_congr_left : (Π a, P (e a)) ≃ (Π b, P b) :=
(Pi_congr_left' P e.symm).symm
end
section
variables
{W : α → Sort w} {Z : β → Sort z} (h₁ : α ≃ β) (h₂ : Π a : α, (W a ≃ Z (h₁ a)))
/--
Transport dependent functions through
an equivalence of the base spaces and a family
of equivalences of the matching fibers.
-/
def Pi_congr : (Π a, W a) ≃ (Π b, Z b) :=
(equiv.Pi_congr_right h₂).trans (equiv.Pi_congr_left _ h₁)
end
section
variables
{W : α → Sort w} {Z : β → Sort z} (h₁ : α ≃ β) (h₂ : Π b : β, (W (h₁.symm b) ≃ Z b))
/--
Transport dependent functions through
an equivalence of the base spaces and a family
of equivalences of the matching fibres.
-/
def Pi_congr' : (Π a, W a) ≃ (Π b, Z b) :=
(Pi_congr h₁.symm (λ b, (h₂ b).symm)).symm
end
end equiv
lemma function.injective.swap_apply [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β}
(hf : function.injective f) (x y z : α) :
equiv.swap (f x) (f y) (f z) = f (equiv.swap x y z) :=
begin
by_cases hx : z = x, by simp [hx],
by_cases hy : z = y, by simp [hy],
rw [equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx hy, equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (hf.ne hx) (hf.ne hy)]
end
lemma function.injective.swap_comp [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β}
(hf : function.injective f) (x y : α) :
equiv.swap (f x) (f y) ∘ f = f ∘ equiv.swap x y :=
funext $ λ z, hf.swap_apply _ _ _
instance {α} [subsingleton α] : subsingleton (ulift α) := equiv.ulift.subsingleton
instance {α} [subsingleton α] : subsingleton (plift α) := equiv.plift.subsingleton
instance {α} [unique α] : unique (ulift α) := equiv.ulift.unique
instance {α} [unique α] : unique (plift α) := equiv.plift.unique
instance {α} [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (ulift α) := equiv.ulift.decidable_eq
instance {α} [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (plift α) := equiv.plift.decidable_eq
/-- If both `α` and `β` are singletons, then `α ≃ β`. -/
def equiv_of_unique_of_unique [unique α] [unique β] : α ≃ β :=
{ to_fun := λ _, default β,
inv_fun := λ _, default α,
left_inv := λ _, subsingleton.elim _ _,
right_inv := λ _, subsingleton.elim _ _ }
/-- If `α` is a singleton, then it is equivalent to any `punit`. -/
def equiv_punit_of_unique [unique α] : α ≃ punit.{v} :=
equiv_of_unique_of_unique
/-- If `α` is a subsingleton, then it is equivalent to `α × α`. -/
def subsingleton_prod_self_equiv {α : Type*} [subsingleton α] : α × α ≃ α :=
{ to_fun := λ p, p.1,
inv_fun := λ a, (a, a),
left_inv := λ p, subsingleton.elim _ _,
right_inv := λ p, subsingleton.elim _ _, }
/-- To give an equivalence between two subsingleton types, it is sufficient to give any two
functions between them. -/
def equiv_of_subsingleton_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] [subsingleton β]
(f : α → β) (g : β → α) : α ≃ β :=
{ to_fun := f,
inv_fun := g,
left_inv := λ _, subsingleton.elim _ _,
right_inv := λ _, subsingleton.elim _ _ }
/-- A nonempty subsingleton type is (noncomputably) equivalent to `punit`. -/
noncomputable
def equiv.punit_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton {α : Sort*} [h : nonempty α] [subsingleton α] :
α ≃ punit.{v} :=
equiv_of_subsingleton_of_subsingleton
(λ _, punit.star) (λ _, h.some)
/-- `unique (unique α)` is equivalent to `unique α`. -/
def unique_unique_equiv : unique (unique α) ≃ unique α :=
equiv_of_subsingleton_of_subsingleton (λ h, h.default)
(λ h, { default := h, uniq := λ _, subsingleton.elim _ _ })
namespace quot
/-- An equivalence `e : α ≃ β` generates an equivalence between quotient spaces,
if `ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂). -/
protected def congr {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β)
(eq : ∀a₁ a₂, ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂)) :
quot ra ≃ quot rb :=
{ to_fun := quot.map e (assume a₁ a₂, (eq a₁ a₂).1),
inv_fun := quot.map e.symm
(assume b₁ b₂ h,
(eq (e.symm b₁) (e.symm b₂)).2
((e.apply_symm_apply b₁).symm ▸ (e.apply_symm_apply b₂).symm ▸ h)),
left_inv := by { rintros ⟨a⟩, dunfold quot.map, simp only [equiv.symm_apply_apply] },
right_inv := by { rintros ⟨a⟩, dunfold quot.map, simp only [equiv.apply_symm_apply] } }
/-- Quotients are congruent on equivalences under equality of their relation.
An alternative is just to use rewriting with `eq`, but then computational proofs get stuck. -/
protected def congr_right {r r' : α → α → Prop} (eq : ∀a₁ a₂, r a₁ a₂ ↔ r' a₁ a₂) :
quot r ≃ quot r' :=
quot.congr (equiv.refl α) eq
/-- An equivalence `e : α ≃ β` generates an equivalence between the quotient space of `α`
by a relation `ra` and the quotient space of `β` by the image of this relation under `e`. -/
protected def congr_left {r : α → α → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
quot r ≃ quot (λ b b', r (e.symm b) (e.symm b')) :=
@quot.congr α β r (λ b b', r (e.symm b) (e.symm b')) e (λ a₁ a₂, by simp only [e.symm_apply_apply])
end quot
namespace quotient
/-- An equivalence `e : α ≃ β` generates an equivalence between quotient spaces,
if `ra a₁ a₂ ↔ rb (e a₁) (e a₂). -/
protected def congr {ra : setoid α} {rb : setoid β} (e : α ≃ β)
(eq : ∀a₁ a₂, @setoid.r α ra a₁ a₂ ↔ @setoid.r β rb (e a₁) (e a₂)) :
quotient ra ≃ quotient rb :=
quot.congr e eq
/-- Quotients are congruent on equivalences under equality of their relation.
An alternative is just to use rewriting with `eq`, but then computational proofs get stuck. -/
protected def congr_right {r r' : setoid α}
(eq : ∀a₁ a₂, @setoid.r α r a₁ a₂ ↔ @setoid.r α r' a₁ a₂) : quotient r ≃ quotient r' :=
quot.congr_right eq
end quotient
/-- If a function is a bijection between two sets `s` and `t`, then it induces an
equivalence between the the types `↥s` and ``↥t`. -/
noncomputable def set.bij_on.equiv {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {s : set α} {t : set β} (f : α → β)
(h : set.bij_on f s t) : s ≃ t :=
equiv.of_bijective _ h.bijective
namespace function
lemma update_comp_equiv {α β α' : Sort*} [decidable_eq α'] [decidable_eq α] (f : α → β) (g : α' ≃ α)
(a : α) (v : β) :
update f a v ∘ g = update (f ∘ g) (g.symm a) v :=
by rw [← update_comp_eq_of_injective _ g.injective, g.apply_symm_apply]
lemma update_apply_equiv_apply {α β α' : Sort*} [decidable_eq α'] [decidable_eq α]
(f : α → β) (g : α' ≃ α) (a : α) (v : β) (a' : α') :
update f a v (g a') = update (f ∘ g) (g.symm a) v a' :=
congr_fun (update_comp_equiv f g a v) a'
end function
/-- The composition of an updated function with an equiv on a subset can be expressed as an
updated function. -/
lemma dite_comp_equiv_update {α : Type*} {β : Sort*} {γ : Sort*} {s : set α} (e : β ≃ s)
(v : β → γ) (w : α → γ) (j : β) (x : γ) [decidable_eq β] [decidable_eq α]
[∀ j, decidable (j ∈ s)] :
(λ (i : α), if h : i ∈ s then (function.update v j x) (e.symm ⟨i, h⟩) else w i) =
function.update (λ (i : α), if h : i ∈ s then v (e.symm ⟨i, h⟩) else w i) (e j) x :=
begin
ext i,
by_cases h : i ∈ s,
{ rw [dif_pos h,
function.update_apply_equiv_apply, equiv.symm_symm, function.comp,
function.update_apply, function.update_apply,
dif_pos h],
have h_coe : (⟨i, h⟩ : s) = e j ↔ i = e j := subtype.ext_iff.trans (by rw subtype.coe_mk),
simp_rw h_coe,
congr, },
{ have : i ≠ e j,
by { contrapose! h, have : (e j : α) ∈ s := (e j).2, rwa ← h at this },
simp [h, this] }
end
|
be299136524fb695ac1303ebbc656ea4dc9f3b44 | aa44b2a5876642f9460205af61a5449b74465655 | /src/repl_example.lean | f4e80535889903b020b9fa385c768e747e3203ef | [] | no_license | robertylewis/mathematica_examples | d129d67de147dc2792dcf0b6b70fac9b2eaf8274 | e317381c49db032accef2a92e7650d029952ad76 | refs/heads/master | 1,632,630,516,240 | 1,631,905,726,000 | 1,631,905,726,000 | 80,952,455 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,448 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import tactic.core
import mathematica
import data.complex.exponential
import data.real.pi
import tactic.interactive_expr
/-!
This demo shows how we can mimic a Mathematica notebook from within Lean.
The syntax here is somewhat hackish; better syntax will be possible in Lean 4.
A section of Mathematica code is entered between `begin_mm_block` and `end_mm_block`.
Mathematica commands are entered in quotes `""`, with each line terminated by a semicolon `;`
corresponding to a `shift-enter` in the standard notebook frontend.
Lean expressions can be inserted as antiquotes between quoted Mathematica expressions.
For parsing reasons, compound Lean expressions must appear in parentheses `()`.
The evaluation of these commands will happen sequentially in the same Mathematica environment.
By default, the output of a line will be translated to a Lean expression and traced.
To display the output as an image instead,
prefix the line with `as image`.
Since Mathematica has no access to Lean's definitional reduction, it is sometimes necessary
to unfold definitions before sending them to Mathematica.
You can begin the block with `begin_mm_block (unfolding f g)` to unfold `f` and `g`
in all antiquoted Lean expressions.
-/
reserve notation `begin_mm_block`
reserve notation `end_mm_block`
reserve notation `as`
reserve notation `image`
reserve notation `unfolding`
@[sym_to_expr]
meta def pi_to_expr : mathematica.sym_trans_expr_rule :=
⟨"Pi", `(real.pi)⟩
@[sym_to_expr]
meta def null_to_expr : mathematica.sym_trans_expr_rule :=
⟨"Null", `(())⟩
/-!
This section develops the widgets for displaying results from Mathematica as images.
-/
section
open widget
meta def component.stateless' {π α} (view : π → list (html α)) : component π α :=
component.with_should_update (λ _ _, tt) $ component.pure view
meta def url_component (src : string) : component tactic_state empty :=
component.stateless' $ λ ts,
[h "h1" [] ["Mathematica output"],
h "img" [attr.val "src" src] []
]
meta def expr_widget (src : expr) : tactic (component tactic_state empty) :=
do s ← tactic.pp src,
return $ component.stateless' $ λ ts,
[h "h1" [] ["Mathematica output"],
h "p" [] [s]
]
end
/-!
This section develops the parser for Mathematica blocks.
-/
section
setup_tactic_parser
open tactic
meta inductive command_comp
| cmd : string → command_comp
| antiquot : expr → command_comp
meta def command_comp.to_string : command_comp → string
| (command_comp.cmd s) := "command: " ++ s
| (command_comp.antiquot s) := "antiquot: " ++ to_string s
meta instance : has_repr command_comp :=
⟨command_comp.to_string⟩
meta def parse_string_component : lean.parser string :=
do s ← parser.pexpr 10000,
to_expr s >>= ↑(eval_expr string)
meta def parse_antiquote : lean.parser pexpr :=
parser.pexpr 10000
meta def parse_component : lean.parser command_comp :=
do pe ← parser.pexpr 10000,
e ← to_expr pe,
tpe ← infer_type e,
if tpe = `(string) then do s ← eval_expr' string e, return $ command_comp.cmd s
else return $ command_comp.antiquot e
meta def parse_cmd_list_aux : lean.parser $ list command_comp :=
tk ";" >> return [] <|>
do c ← parse_component, cs ← parse_cmd_list_aux, return (c::cs)
meta def parse_cmd_list : lean.parser $ bool × pos × list command_comp :=
do pos ← cur_pos,
is_img ← option.is_some <$> (tk "as" >> tk "image")?,
prod.mk is_img <$> prod.mk pos <$> parse_cmd_list_aux
/-!
This section translates, evaluates, and displays the result of a parsed Mathematica command.
-/
meta def command_comp.translate (to_unfold : list name) : command_comp → tactic string
| (command_comp.cmd s) := return s
| (command_comp.antiquot p) :=
do s ← mathematica.form_of_expr <$> dunfold to_unfold p {fail_if_unchanged := ff},
return $ "Activate[LeanForm[" ++ s ++ "]]"
meta def execute_list (to_unfold : list name) (is_img : bool) (l : list command_comp) : tactic pexpr :=
do l ← l.mmap (command_comp.translate to_unfold), --tactic.trace $ string.join l,
let cmd := if is_img then "MakeDataUrlFromImage[" ++ string.join l ++ "]" else string.join l,
s ← mathematica.execute_global cmd >>= parse_mmexpr_tac,
mathematica.pexpr_of_mmexpr mathematica.trans_env.empty s
meta def string_of_pos_comp (to_unfold : list name) :
bool × pos × list command_comp → tactic (pos × (string ⊕ expr))
| ⟨is_img, p, c⟩ :=
do e ← execute_list to_unfold is_img c >>= to_expr,
prod.mk p <$> if is_img then sum.inl <$> eval_expr string e else return (sum.inr e)
meta def make_widget (to_unfold : list name) (p : bool × pos × list command_comp) :
tactic $ pos × (widget.component tactic_state empty) :=
do (loc, data) ← string_of_pos_comp to_unfold p,
match data with
| sum.inl s := return $ ⟨loc, url_component s⟩
| sum.inr e := prod.mk loc <$> expr_widget e
end
@[user_command] meta def parse_mm_block (_ : parse (tk "begin_mm_block")) : lean.parser unit :=
do to_unfold ← (tk "(" >> tk "unfolding" >> ident* <* tk ")")?,
l ← parse_cmd_list*,
tk "end_mm_block",
l ← l.mmap (λ e, make_widget (to_unfold.get_or_else []) e),
l.mmap' $ λ ⟨⟨ln, c⟩, w⟩, save_widget ⟨ln, c - ("begin_mm_block".length - 1)⟩ w
end
/-!
In this example we show a Mathematica block with three image plots.
Put the cursor on the first characters of the `as image` lines to see the output.
In the second line, we plot a Lean function given as a lambda expression.
In the third, we plot a Lean definition, that we have marked to unfold at the beginning.
-/
open real
noncomputable def f : ℝ → ℝ := λ x, sin x + cos x
begin_mm_block (unfolding f)
as image
"Plot3D[x^2-y, {x,-3,3}, {y,-3,3}]";
as image
"Plot["(λ y, (sin y)^2 - y^2)"[x], {x,-10,10}]";
as image
"Plot["f"[y], {y,-2,2}]";
end_mm_block
/-!
This example gets output from Mathematica as expressions instead of images.
First, we define a symbol `MyPoly` as a Lean expression and factor it.
Then we directly factor a Lean expression.
Uncommenting the `pp` line above shows that we really are seeing full Lean expressions in the output.
-/
-- set_option pp.all true
constants y z : ℝ
begin_mm_block
"MyPoly ="(z^2-2*z+1);
"Factor[MyPoly]";
"Factor["(y^10-z^10)"]";
end_mm_block |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.