blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
59818f007fd69a344f374bc7574cd08089e097d6 | dd0f5513e11c52db157d2fcc8456d9401a6cd9da | /10_Structures_and_Records.org.3.lean | d1cd44b8ea58a279537edf5d6ea82bbd6eff2e5f | [] | no_license | cjmazey/lean-tutorial | ba559a49f82aa6c5848b9bf17b7389bf7f4ba645 | 381f61c9fcac56d01d959ae0fa6e376f2c4e3b34 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,286,098,832 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 43,082,433 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 104 | lean | import standard
structure point (A : Type) :=
mk :: (x : A) (y : A)
-- BEGIN
print prefix point
-- END
|
2f68fdfe3e29862db049a6329357e4174444f788 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/contradictionLoop.lean | 08108190569b300339357f29921d95f96cdda31d | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 73 | lean | theorem ex (h : 10000 = 100001) : False := by
contradiction
#print ex
|
31c7923c022b48199727e77c0a6f91c55b4b4f50 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/lie/weights.lean | e6333cf7d39a532c91a7e78b3e80fc6f325057c0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,155 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import algebra.lie.nilpotent
import algebra.lie.tensor_product
import algebra.lie.character
import algebra.lie.cartan_subalgebra
import linear_algebra.eigenspace
/-!
# Weights and roots of Lie modules and Lie algebras
Just as a key tool when studying the behaviour of a linear operator is to decompose the space on
which it acts into a sum of (generalised) eigenspaces, a key tool when studying a representation `M`
of Lie algebra `L` is to decompose `M` into a sum of simultaneous eigenspaces of `x` as `x` ranges
over `L`. These simultaneous generalised eigenspaces are known as the weight spaces of `M`.
When `L` is nilpotent, it follows from the binomial theorem that weight spaces are Lie submodules.
Even when `L` is not nilpotent, it may be useful to study its representations by restricting them
to a nilpotent subalgebra (e.g., a Cartan subalgebra). In the particular case when we view `L` as a
module over itself via the adjoint action, the weight spaces of `L` restricted to a nilpotent
subalgebra are known as root spaces.
Basic definitions and properties of the above ideas are provided in this file.
## Main definitions
* `lie_module.weight_space`
* `lie_module.is_weight`
* `lie_algebra.root_space`
* `lie_algebra.is_root`
* `lie_algebra.root_space_weight_space_product`
* `lie_algebra.root_space_product`
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 7--9*](bourbaki1975b)
## Tags
lie character, eigenvalue, eigenspace, weight, weight vector, root, root vector
-/
universes u v w w₁ w₂ w₃
variables {R : Type u} {L : Type v} [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
variables (H : lie_subalgebra R L) [lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R H]
variables (M : Type w) [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
namespace lie_module
open lie_algebra
open tensor_product
open tensor_product.lie_module
open_locale big_operators
open_locale tensor_product
/-- Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, the pre-weight space of `M` with respect to a
map `χ : L → R` is the simultaneous generalized eigenspace of the action of all `x : L` on `M`,
with eigenvalues `χ x`.
See also `lie_module.weight_space`. -/
def pre_weight_space (χ : L → R) : submodule R M :=
⨅ (x : L), (to_endomorphism R L M x).maximal_generalized_eigenspace (χ x)
lemma mem_pre_weight_space (χ : L → R) (m : M) :
m ∈ pre_weight_space M χ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ (k : ℕ), ((to_endomorphism R L M x - (χ x) • 1)^k) m = 0 :=
by simp [pre_weight_space, -linear_map.pow_apply]
variables (L)
/-- See also `bourbaki1975b` Chapter VII §1.1, Proposition 2 (ii). -/
protected lemma weight_vector_multiplication (M₁ : Type w₁) (M₂ : Type w₂) (M₃ : Type w₃)
[add_comm_group M₁] [module R M₁] [lie_ring_module L M₁] [lie_module R L M₁]
[add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂] [lie_ring_module L M₂] [lie_module R L M₂]
[add_comm_group M₃] [module R M₃] [lie_ring_module L M₃] [lie_module R L M₃]
(g : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₃) (χ₁ χ₂ : L → R) :
((g : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp
(map_incl (pre_weight_space M₁ χ₁) (pre_weight_space M₂ χ₂))).range ≤
pre_weight_space M₃ (χ₁ + χ₂) :=
begin
/- Unpack the statement of the goal. -/
intros m₃,
simp only [lie_module_hom.coe_to_linear_map, pi.add_apply, function.comp_app,
mem_pre_weight_space, linear_map.coe_comp, tensor_product.map_incl, exists_imp_distrib,
linear_map.mem_range],
rintros t rfl x,
/- Set up some notation. -/
let F : module.End R M₃ := (to_endomorphism R L M₃ x) - (χ₁ x + χ₂ x) • 1,
change ∃ k, (F^k) (g _) = 0,
/- The goal is linear in `t` so use induction to reduce to the case that `t` is a pure tensor. -/
apply t.induction_on,
{ use 0, simp only [linear_map.map_zero, lie_module_hom.map_zero], },
swap,
{ rintros t₁ t₂ ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩ ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩, use max k₁ k₂,
simp only [lie_module_hom.map_add, linear_map.map_add,
linear_map.pow_map_zero_of_le (le_max_left k₁ k₂) hk₁,
linear_map.pow_map_zero_of_le (le_max_right k₁ k₂) hk₂, add_zero], },
/- Now the main argument: pure tensors. -/
rintros ⟨m₁, hm₁⟩ ⟨m₂, hm₂⟩,
change ∃ k, (F^k) ((g : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂)) = 0,
/- Eliminate `g` from the picture. -/
let f₁ : module.End R (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) := (to_endomorphism R L M₁ x - (χ₁ x) • 1).rtensor M₂,
let f₂ : module.End R (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) := (to_endomorphism R L M₂ x - (χ₂ x) • 1).ltensor M₁,
have h_comm_square : F.comp ↑g = (g : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp (f₁ + f₂),
{ ext m₁ m₂, simp only [← g.map_lie x (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂), add_smul, sub_tmul, tmul_sub, smul_tmul,
lie_tmul_right, tmul_smul, to_endomorphism_apply_apply, lie_module_hom.map_smul,
linear_map.one_apply, lie_module_hom.coe_to_linear_map, linear_map.smul_apply,
function.comp_app, linear_map.coe_comp, linear_map.rtensor_tmul, lie_module_hom.map_add,
linear_map.add_apply, lie_module_hom.map_sub, linear_map.sub_apply, linear_map.ltensor_tmul,
algebra_tensor_module.curry_apply, curry_apply, linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe,
linear_map.coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe], abel, },
suffices : ∃ k, ((f₁ + f₂)^k) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = 0,
{ obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := this, use k,
rw [← linear_map.comp_apply, linear_map.commute_pow_left_of_commute h_comm_square,
linear_map.comp_apply, hk, linear_map.map_zero], },
/- Unpack the information we have about `m₁`, `m₂`. -/
simp only [mem_pre_weight_space] at hm₁ hm₂,
obtain ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩ := hm₁ x,
obtain ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩ := hm₂ x,
have hf₁ : (f₁^k₁) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = 0,
{ simp only [hk₁, zero_tmul, linear_map.rtensor_tmul, linear_map.rtensor_pow], },
have hf₂ : (f₂^k₂) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = 0,
{ simp only [hk₂, tmul_zero, linear_map.ltensor_tmul, linear_map.ltensor_pow], },
/- It's now just an application of the binomial theorem. -/
use k₁ + k₂ - 1,
have hf_comm : commute f₁ f₂,
{ ext m₁ m₂, simp only [linear_map.mul_apply, linear_map.rtensor_tmul, linear_map.ltensor_tmul,
algebra_tensor_module.curry_apply, linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, linear_map.ltensor_tmul,
curry_apply, linear_map.coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe], },
rw hf_comm.add_pow',
simp only [tensor_product.map_incl, submodule.subtype_apply, finset.sum_apply,
submodule.coe_mk, linear_map.coe_fn_sum, tensor_product.map_tmul, linear_map.smul_apply],
/- The required sum is zero because each individual term is zero. -/
apply finset.sum_eq_zero,
rintros ⟨i, j⟩ hij,
/- Eliminate the binomial coefficients from the picture. -/
suffices : (f₁^i * f₂^j) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = 0, { rw this, apply smul_zero, },
/- Finish off with appropriate case analysis. -/
cases nat.le_or_le_of_add_eq_add_pred (finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal.mp hij) with hi hj,
{ rw [(hf_comm.pow_pow i j).eq, linear_map.mul_apply, linear_map.pow_map_zero_of_le hi hf₁,
linear_map.map_zero], },
{ rw [linear_map.mul_apply, linear_map.pow_map_zero_of_le hj hf₂, linear_map.map_zero], },
end
variables {L M}
lemma lie_mem_pre_weight_space_of_mem_pre_weight_space {χ₁ χ₂ : L → R} {x : L} {m : M}
(hx : x ∈ pre_weight_space L χ₁) (hm : m ∈ pre_weight_space M χ₂) :
⁅x, m⁆ ∈ pre_weight_space M (χ₁ + χ₂) :=
begin
apply lie_module.weight_vector_multiplication L L M M (to_module_hom R L M) χ₁ χ₂,
simp only [lie_module_hom.coe_to_linear_map, function.comp_app, linear_map.coe_comp,
tensor_product.map_incl, linear_map.mem_range],
use [⟨x, hx⟩ ⊗ₜ ⟨m, hm⟩],
simp only [submodule.subtype_apply, to_module_hom_apply, tensor_product.map_tmul],
refl,
end
variables (M)
/-- If a Lie algebra is nilpotent, then pre-weight spaces are Lie submodules. -/
def weight_space [lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R L] (χ : L → R) : lie_submodule R L M :=
{ lie_mem := λ x m hm,
begin
rw ← zero_add χ,
refine lie_mem_pre_weight_space_of_mem_pre_weight_space _ hm,
suffices : pre_weight_space L (0 : L → R) = ⊤, { simp only [this, submodule.mem_top], },
exact lie_algebra.infi_max_gen_zero_eigenspace_eq_top_of_nilpotent R L,
end,
.. pre_weight_space M χ }
lemma mem_weight_space [lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R L] (χ : L → R) (m : M) :
m ∈ weight_space M χ ↔ m ∈ pre_weight_space M χ :=
iff.rfl
/-- See also the more useful form `lie_module.zero_weight_space_eq_top_of_nilpotent`. -/
@[simp] lemma zero_weight_space_eq_top_of_nilpotent'
[lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R L] [is_nilpotent R L M] :
weight_space M (0 : L → R) = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, lie_submodule.top_coe_submodule],
exact infi_max_gen_zero_eigenspace_eq_top_of_nilpotent R L M,
end
lemma coe_weight_space_of_top [lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R L] (χ : L → R) :
(weight_space M (χ ∘ (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L).incl) : submodule R M) = weight_space M χ :=
begin
ext m,
simp only [weight_space, lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_mk, lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module,
function.comp_app, mem_pre_weight_space],
split; intros h x,
{ obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h ⟨x, set.mem_univ x⟩, use k, exact hk, },
{ obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h x, use k, exact hk, },
end
@[simp] lemma zero_weight_space_eq_top_of_nilpotent
[lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R L] [is_nilpotent R L M] :
weight_space M (0 : (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L) → R) = ⊤ :=
begin
/- We use `coe_weight_space_of_top` as a trick to circumvent the fact that we don't (yet) know
`is_nilpotent R (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L) M` is equivalent to `is_nilpotent R L M`. -/
have h₀ : (0 : L → R) ∘ (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L).incl = 0, { ext, refl, },
rw [← lie_submodule.coe_to_submodule_eq_iff, lie_submodule.top_coe_submodule, ← h₀,
coe_weight_space_of_top, ← infi_max_gen_zero_eigenspace_eq_top_of_nilpotent R L M],
refl,
end
/-- Given a Lie module `M` of a Lie algebra `L`, a weight of `M` with respect to a nilpotent
subalgebra `H ⊆ L` is a Lie character whose corresponding weight space is non-empty. -/
def is_weight (χ : lie_character R H) : Prop := weight_space M χ ≠ ⊥
/-- For a non-trivial nilpotent Lie module over a nilpotent Lie algebra, the zero character is a
weight with respect to the `⊤` Lie subalgebra. -/
lemma is_weight_zero_of_nilpotent
[nontrivial M] [lie_algebra.is_nilpotent R L] [is_nilpotent R L M] :
is_weight (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L) M 0 :=
by { rw [is_weight, lie_hom.coe_zero, zero_weight_space_eq_top_of_nilpotent], exact top_ne_bot, }
end lie_module
namespace lie_algebra
open_locale tensor_product
open tensor_product.lie_module
open lie_module
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L`, the root space of a map `χ : H → R` is the weight
space of `L` regarded as a module of `H` via the adjoint action. -/
abbreviation root_space (χ : H → R) : lie_submodule R H L := weight_space L χ
@[simp] lemma zero_root_space_eq_top_of_nilpotent [h : is_nilpotent R L] :
root_space (⊤ : lie_subalgebra R L) 0 = ⊤ :=
zero_weight_space_eq_top_of_nilpotent L
/-- A root of a Lie algebra `L` with respect to a nilpotent subalgebra `H ⊆ L` is a weight of `L`,
regarded as a module of `H` via the adjoint action. -/
abbreviation is_root := is_weight H L
@[simp] lemma root_space_comap_eq_weight_space (χ : H → R) :
(root_space H χ).comap H.incl' = weight_space H χ :=
begin
ext x,
let f : H → module.End R L := λ y, to_endomorphism R H L y - (χ y) • 1,
let g : H → module.End R H := λ y, to_endomorphism R H H y - (χ y) • 1,
suffices : (∀ (y : H), ∃ (k : ℕ), ((f y)^k).comp (H.incl : H →ₗ[R] L) x = 0) ↔
∀ (y : H), ∃ (k : ℕ), (H.incl : H →ₗ[R] L).comp ((g y)^k) x = 0,
{ simp only [lie_hom.coe_to_linear_map, lie_subalgebra.coe_incl, function.comp_app,
linear_map.coe_comp, submodule.coe_eq_zero] at this,
simp only [mem_weight_space, mem_pre_weight_space,
lie_subalgebra.coe_incl', lie_submodule.mem_comap, this], },
have hfg : ∀ (y : H), (f y).comp (H.incl : H →ₗ[R] L) = (H.incl : H →ₗ[R] L).comp (g y),
{ rintros ⟨y, hz⟩, ext ⟨z, hz⟩,
simp only [submodule.coe_sub, to_endomorphism_apply_apply, lie_hom.coe_to_linear_map,
linear_map.one_apply, lie_subalgebra.coe_incl, lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module,
lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket, linear_map.smul_apply, function.comp_app,
submodule.coe_smul_of_tower, linear_map.coe_comp, linear_map.sub_apply], },
simp_rw [linear_map.commute_pow_left_of_commute (hfg _)],
end
variables {H M}
lemma lie_mem_weight_space_of_mem_weight_space {χ₁ χ₂ : H → R} {x : L} {m : M}
(hx : x ∈ root_space H χ₁) (hm : m ∈ weight_space M χ₂) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ weight_space M (χ₁ + χ₂) :=
begin
apply lie_module.weight_vector_multiplication
H L M M ((to_module_hom R L M).restrict_lie H) χ₁ χ₂,
simp only [lie_module_hom.coe_to_linear_map, function.comp_app, linear_map.coe_comp,
tensor_product.map_incl, linear_map.mem_range],
use [⟨x, hx⟩ ⊗ₜ ⟨m, hm⟩],
simp only [submodule.subtype_apply, to_module_hom_apply, submodule.coe_mk,
lie_module_hom.coe_restrict_lie, tensor_product.map_tmul],
end
variables (R L H M)
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L` together with `χ₁ χ₂ : H → R`, there is a natural
`R`-bilinear product of root vectors and weight vectors, compatible with the actions of `H`. -/
def root_space_weight_space_product (χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) :
(root_space H χ₁) ⊗[R] (weight_space M χ₂) →ₗ⁅R,H⁆ weight_space M χ₃ :=
lift_lie R H (root_space H χ₁) (weight_space M χ₂) (weight_space M χ₃)
{ to_fun := λ x,
{ to_fun :=
λ m, ⟨⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆,
hχ ▸ (lie_mem_weight_space_of_mem_weight_space x.property m.property) ⟩,
map_add' := λ m n, by { simp only [lie_submodule.coe_add, lie_add], refl, },
map_smul' := λ t m, by { conv_lhs { congr, rw [lie_submodule.coe_smul, lie_smul], }, refl, }, },
map_add' := λ x y, by ext m; rw [linear_map.add_apply, linear_map.coe_mk, linear_map.coe_mk,
linear_map.coe_mk, subtype.coe_mk, lie_submodule.coe_add, lie_submodule.coe_add, add_lie,
subtype.coe_mk, subtype.coe_mk],
map_smul' := λ t x, by ext m; rw [linear_map.smul_apply, linear_map.coe_mk, linear_map.coe_mk,
subtype.coe_mk, lie_submodule.coe_smul, smul_lie, lie_submodule.coe_smul, subtype.coe_mk],
map_lie' := λ x y, by ext m; rw [lie_hom.lie_apply, lie_submodule.coe_sub, linear_map.coe_mk,
linear_map.coe_mk, subtype.coe_mk, subtype.coe_mk, lie_submodule.coe_bracket,
lie_submodule.coe_bracket, subtype.coe_mk, lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module,
lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module, lie_submodule.coe_bracket,
lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module, lie_lie], }
@[simp] lemma coe_root_space_weight_space_product_tmul
(χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) (x : root_space H χ₁) (m : weight_space M χ₂) :
(root_space_weight_space_product R L H M χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ hχ (x ⊗ₜ m) : M) = ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ :=
by simp only [root_space_weight_space_product, lift_apply, lie_module_hom.coe_to_linear_map,
coe_lift_lie_eq_lift_coe, submodule.coe_mk, linear_map.coe_mk, lie_module_hom.coe_mk]
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L` together with `χ₁ χ₂ : H → R`, there is a natural
`R`-bilinear product of root vectors, compatible with the actions of `H`. -/
def root_space_product (χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) :
(root_space H χ₁) ⊗[R] (root_space H χ₂) →ₗ⁅R,H⁆ root_space H χ₃ :=
root_space_weight_space_product R L H L χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ hχ
@[simp] lemma root_space_product_def :
root_space_product R L H = root_space_weight_space_product R L H L :=
rfl
lemma root_space_product_tmul
(χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) (x : root_space H χ₁) (y : root_space H χ₂) :
(root_space_product R L H χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ hχ (x ⊗ₜ y) : L) = ⁅(x : L), (y : L)⁆ :=
by simp only [root_space_product_def, coe_root_space_weight_space_product_tmul]
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L`, the root space of the zero map `0 : H → R` is a Lie
subalgebra of `L`. -/
def zero_root_subalgebra : lie_subalgebra R L :=
{ lie_mem' := λ x y hx hy, by
{ let xy : (root_space H 0) ⊗[R] (root_space H 0) := ⟨x, hx⟩ ⊗ₜ ⟨y, hy⟩,
suffices : (root_space_product R L H 0 0 0 (add_zero 0) xy : L) ∈ root_space H 0,
{ rwa [root_space_product_tmul, subtype.coe_mk, subtype.coe_mk] at this, },
exact (root_space_product R L H 0 0 0 (add_zero 0) xy).property, },
.. (root_space H 0 : submodule R L) }
@[simp] lemma coe_zero_root_subalgebra :
(zero_root_subalgebra R L H : submodule R L) = root_space H 0 :=
rfl
lemma mem_zero_root_subalgebra (x : L) :
x ∈ zero_root_subalgebra R L H ↔ ∀ (y : H), ∃ (k : ℕ), ((to_endomorphism R H L y)^k) x = 0 :=
by simp only [zero_root_subalgebra, mem_weight_space, mem_pre_weight_space, pi.zero_apply, sub_zero,
set_like.mem_coe, zero_smul, lie_submodule.mem_coe_submodule, submodule.mem_carrier,
lie_subalgebra.mem_mk_iff]
lemma to_lie_submodule_le_root_space_zero : H.to_lie_submodule ≤ root_space H 0 :=
begin
intros x hx,
simp only [lie_subalgebra.mem_to_lie_submodule] at hx,
simp only [mem_weight_space, mem_pre_weight_space, pi.zero_apply, sub_zero, zero_smul],
intros y,
unfreezingI { obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (infer_instance : is_nilpotent R H) },
use k,
let f : module.End R H := to_endomorphism R H H y,
let g : module.End R L := to_endomorphism R H L y,
have hfg : g.comp (H : submodule R L).subtype = (H : submodule R L).subtype.comp f,
{ ext z, simp only [to_endomorphism_apply_apply, submodule.subtype_apply,
lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module, lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket, function.comp_app,
linear_map.coe_comp], },
change (g^k).comp (H : submodule R L).subtype ⟨x, hx⟩ = 0,
rw linear_map.commute_pow_left_of_commute hfg k,
have h := iterate_to_endomorphism_mem_lower_central_series R H H y ⟨x, hx⟩ k,
rw [hk, lie_submodule.mem_bot] at h,
simp only [submodule.subtype_apply, function.comp_app, linear_map.pow_apply, linear_map.coe_comp,
submodule.coe_eq_zero],
exact h,
end
lemma le_zero_root_subalgebra : H ≤ zero_root_subalgebra R L H :=
begin
rw [← lie_subalgebra.coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule, ← H.coe_to_lie_submodule,
coe_zero_root_subalgebra, lie_submodule.coe_submodule_le_coe_submodule],
exact to_lie_submodule_le_root_space_zero R L H,
end
@[simp] lemma zero_root_subalgebra_normalizer_eq_self :
(zero_root_subalgebra R L H).normalizer = zero_root_subalgebra R L H :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (lie_subalgebra.le_normalizer _),
intros x hx,
rw lie_subalgebra.mem_normalizer_iff at hx,
rw mem_zero_root_subalgebra,
rintros ⟨y, hy⟩,
specialize hx y (le_zero_root_subalgebra R L H hy),
rw mem_zero_root_subalgebra at hx,
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hx ⟨y, hy⟩,
rw [← lie_skew, linear_map.map_neg, neg_eq_zero] at hk,
use k + 1,
rw [linear_map.iterate_succ, linear_map.coe_comp, function.comp_app, to_endomorphism_apply_apply,
lie_subalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module, submodule.coe_mk, hk],
end
/-- In finite dimensions over a field (and possibly more generally) Engel's theorem shows that
the converse of this is also true, i.e.,
`zero_root_subalgebra R L H = H ↔ lie_subalgebra.is_cartan_subalgebra H`. -/
lemma zero_root_subalgebra_is_cartan_of_eq (h : zero_root_subalgebra R L H = H) :
lie_subalgebra.is_cartan_subalgebra H :=
{ nilpotent := infer_instance,
self_normalizing := by { rw ← h, exact zero_root_subalgebra_normalizer_eq_self R L H, } }
end lie_algebra
namespace lie_module
open lie_algebra
variables {R L H}
/-- A priori, weight spaces are Lie submodules over the Lie subalgebra `H` used to define them.
However they are naturally Lie submodules over the (in general larger) Lie subalgebra
`zero_root_subalgebra R L H`. Even though it is often the case that
`zero_root_subalgebra R L H = H`, it is likely to be useful to have the flexibility not to have
to invoke this equality (as well as to work more generally). -/
def weight_space' (χ : H → R) : lie_submodule R (zero_root_subalgebra R L H) M :=
{ lie_mem := λ x m hm, by
{ have hx : (x : L) ∈ root_space H 0,
{ rw [← lie_submodule.mem_coe_submodule, ← coe_zero_root_subalgebra], exact x.property, },
rw ← zero_add χ,
exact lie_mem_weight_space_of_mem_weight_space hx hm, },
.. (weight_space M χ : submodule R M) }
@[simp] lemma coe_weight_space' (χ : H → R) :
(weight_space' M χ : submodule R M) = weight_space M χ :=
rfl
end lie_module
|
06b1a52ff48bf5f1a536410fbf8b25f63bc8ee46 | 9b9a16fa2cb737daee6b2785474678b6fa91d6d4 | /src/algebra/module.lean | d79e7199bada3ec342a4653e642f2ad98efcc659 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | johoelzl/mathlib | 253f46daa30b644d011e8e119025b01ad69735c4 | 592e3c7a2dfbd5826919b4605559d35d4d75938f | refs/heads/master | 1,625,657,216,488 | 1,551,374,946,000 | 1,551,374,946,000 | 98,915,829 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,522,917,267,000 | 1,501,524,499,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,273 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Nathaniel Thomas. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Modules over a ring.
-/
import algebra.ring algebra.big_operators
open function
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
/-- Typeclass for types with a scalar multiplication operation, denoted `•` (`\bu`) -/
class has_scalar (α : Type u) (γ : Type v) := (smul : α → γ → γ)
infixr ` • `:73 := has_scalar.smul
/-- A semimodule is a generalization of vector spaces to a scalar semiring.
It consists of a scalar semiring `α` and an additive monoid of "vectors" `β`,
connected by a "scalar multiplication" operation `r • x : β`
(where `r : α` and `x : β`) with some natural associativity and
distributivity axioms similar to those on a ring. -/
class semimodule (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [semiring α]
[add_comm_monoid β] extends has_scalar α β :=
(smul_add : ∀(r : α) (x y : β), r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y)
(add_smul : ∀(r s : α) (x : β), (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x)
(mul_smul : ∀(r s : α) (x : β), (r * s) • x = r • s • x)
(one_smul : ∀x : β, (1 : α) • x = x)
(zero_smul : ∀x : β, (0 : α) • x = 0)
(smul_zero {} : ∀(r : α), r • (0 : β) = 0)
section semimodule
variables [R:semiring α] [add_comm_monoid β] [semimodule α β] (r s : α) (x y : β)
include R
theorem smul_add : r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y := semimodule.smul_add r x y
theorem add_smul : (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x := semimodule.add_smul r s x
theorem mul_smul : (r * s) • x = r • s • x := semimodule.mul_smul r s x
@[simp] theorem smul_zero : r • (0 : β) = 0 := semimodule.smul_zero r
variables (α)
@[simp] theorem one_smul : (1 : α) • x = x := semimodule.one_smul α x
@[simp] theorem zero_smul : (0 : α) • x = 0 := semimodule.zero_smul α x
lemma smul_smul : r • s • x = (r * s) • x := (mul_smul _ _ _).symm
instance smul.is_add_monoid_hom {r : α} : is_add_monoid_hom (λ x : β, r • x) :=
by refine_struct {..}; simp [smul_add]
end semimodule
/-- A module is a generalization of vector spaces to a scalar ring.
It consists of a scalar ring `α` and an additive group of "vectors" `β`,
connected by a "scalar multiplication" operation `r • x : β`
(where `r : α` and `x : β`) with some natural associativity and
distributivity axioms similar to those on a ring. -/
class module (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [ring α] [add_comm_group β] extends semimodule α β
structure module.core (α β) [ring α] [add_comm_group β] extends has_scalar α β :=
(smul_add : ∀(r : α) (x y : β), r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y)
(add_smul : ∀(r s : α) (x : β), (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x)
(mul_smul : ∀(r s : α) (x : β), (r * s) • x = r • s • x)
(one_smul : ∀x : β, (1 : α) • x = x)
def module.of_core {α β} [ring α] [add_comm_group β] (M : module.core α β) : module α β :=
by letI := M.to_has_scalar; exact
{ zero_smul := λ x,
have (0 : α) • x + (0 : α) • x = (0 : α) • x + 0, by rw ← M.add_smul; simp,
add_left_cancel this,
smul_zero := λ r,
have r • (0:β) + r • 0 = r • 0 + 0, by rw ← M.smul_add; simp,
add_left_cancel this,
..M }
section module
variables [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [module α β] (r s : α) (x y : β)
@[simp] theorem neg_smul : -r • x = - (r • x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero (by rw [← add_smul, add_left_neg, zero_smul])
variables (α)
theorem neg_one_smul (x : β) : (-1 : α) • x = -x := by simp
variables {α}
@[simp] theorem smul_neg : r • (-x) = -(r • x) :=
by rw [← neg_one_smul α, ← mul_smul, mul_neg_one, neg_smul]
theorem smul_sub (r : α) (x y : β) : r • (x - y) = r • x - r • y :=
by simp [smul_add]; rw smul_neg
theorem sub_smul (r s : α) (y : β) : (r - s) • y = r • y - s • y :=
by simp [add_smul]
end module
instance semiring.to_semimodule [r : semiring α] : semimodule α α :=
{ smul := (*),
smul_add := mul_add,
add_smul := add_mul,
mul_smul := mul_assoc,
one_smul := one_mul,
zero_smul := zero_mul,
smul_zero := mul_zero, ..r }
@[simp] lemma smul_eq_mul [semiring α] {a a' : α} : a • a' = a * a' := rfl
instance ring.to_module [r : ring α] : module α α :=
{ ..semiring.to_semimodule }
class is_linear_map (α : Type u) {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
[ring α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ] [module α β] [module α γ]
(f : β → γ) : Prop :=
(add : ∀x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(smul : ∀(c : α) x, f (c • x) = c • f x)
structure linear_map (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : Type w)
[ring α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ] [module α β] [module α γ] :=
(to_fun : β → γ)
(add : ∀x y, to_fun (x + y) = to_fun x + to_fun y)
(smul : ∀(c : α) x, to_fun (c • x) = c • to_fun x)
infixr ` →ₗ `:25 := linear_map _
notation β ` →ₗ[`:25 α `] ` γ := linear_map α β γ
namespace linear_map
variables [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ] [add_comm_group δ]
variables [module α β] [module α γ] [module α δ]
variables (f g : β →ₗ[α] γ)
include α
instance : has_coe_to_fun (β →ₗ[α] γ) := ⟨_, to_fun⟩
theorem is_linear : is_linear_map α f := {..f}
@[extensionality] theorem ext {f g : β →ₗ[α] γ} (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; congr'; exact funext H
theorem ext_iff {f g : β →ₗ[α] γ} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨by rintro rfl; simp, ext⟩
@[simp] lemma map_add (x y : β) : f (x + y) = f x + f y := f.add x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (c : α) (x : β) : f (c • x) = c • f x := f.smul c x
@[simp] lemma map_zero : f 0 = 0 :=
by rw [← zero_smul α, map_smul f 0 0, zero_smul]
instance : is_add_group_hom f := ⟨map_add f⟩
@[simp] lemma map_neg (x : β) : f (- x) = - f x :=
by rw [← neg_one_smul α, map_smul, neg_one_smul]
@[simp] lemma map_sub (x y : β) : f (x - y) = f x - f y :=
by simp [map_neg, map_add]
@[simp] lemma map_sum {ι} {t : finset ι} {g : ι → β} :
f (t.sum g) = t.sum (λi, f (g i)) :=
(finset.sum_hom f).symm
def comp (f : γ →ₗ[α] δ) (g : β →ₗ[α] γ) : β →ₗ[α] δ := ⟨f ∘ g, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : γ →ₗ[α] δ) (g : β →ₗ[α] γ) (x : β) : f.comp g x = f (g x) := rfl
def id : β →ₗ[α] β := ⟨id, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma id_apply (x : β) : @id α β _ _ _ x = x := rfl
end linear_map
namespace is_linear_map
variables [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ]
variables [module α β] [module α γ]
include α
def mk' (f : β → γ) (H : is_linear_map α f) : β →ₗ γ := {to_fun := f, ..H}
@[simp] theorem mk'_apply {f : β → γ} (H : is_linear_map α f) (x : β) :
mk' f H x = f x := rfl
end is_linear_map
/-- A submodule of a module is one which is closed under vector operations.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset of vectors in the submodule
to themselves form a module. -/
structure submodule (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [ring α]
[add_comm_group β] [module α β] : Type v :=
(carrier : set β)
(zero : (0:β) ∈ carrier)
(add : ∀ {x y}, x ∈ carrier → y ∈ carrier → x + y ∈ carrier)
(smul : ∀ (c:α) {x}, x ∈ carrier → c • x ∈ carrier)
namespace submodule
variables [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ]
variables [module α β] [module α γ]
variables (p p' : submodule α β)
variables {r : α} {x y : β}
instance : has_coe (submodule α β) (set β) := ⟨submodule.carrier⟩
instance : has_mem β (submodule α β) := ⟨λ x p, x ∈ (p : set β)⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_coe : x ∈ (p : set β) ↔ x ∈ p := iff.rfl
theorem ext' {s t : submodule α β} (h : (s : set β) = t) : s = t :=
by cases s; cases t; congr'
protected theorem ext'_iff {s t : submodule α β} : (s : set β) = t ↔ s = t :=
⟨ext', λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[extensionality] theorem ext {s t : submodule α β}
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : s = t := ext' $ set.ext h
@[simp] lemma zero_mem : (0 : β) ∈ p := p.zero
lemma add_mem (h₁ : x ∈ p) (h₂ : y ∈ p) : x + y ∈ p := p.add h₁ h₂
lemma smul_mem (r : α) (h : x ∈ p) : r • x ∈ p := p.smul r h
lemma neg_mem (hx : x ∈ p) : -x ∈ p := by rw ← neg_one_smul α; exact p.smul_mem _ hx
lemma sub_mem (hx : x ∈ p) (hy : y ∈ p) : x - y ∈ p := p.add_mem hx (p.neg_mem hy)
lemma neg_mem_iff : -x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ p :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using neg_mem p h, neg_mem p⟩
lemma add_mem_iff_left (h₁ : y ∈ p) : x + y ∈ p ↔ x ∈ p :=
⟨λ h₂, by simpa using sub_mem _ h₂ h₁, λ h₂, add_mem _ h₂ h₁⟩
lemma add_mem_iff_right (h₁ : x ∈ p) : x + y ∈ p ↔ y ∈ p :=
⟨λ h₂, by simpa using sub_mem _ h₂ h₁, add_mem _ h₁⟩
lemma sum_mem {ι : Type w} [decidable_eq ι] {t : finset ι} {f : ι → β} :
(∀c∈t, f c ∈ p) → t.sum f ∈ p :=
finset.induction_on t (by simp [p.zero_mem]) (by simp [p.add_mem] {contextual := tt})
instance : has_add p := ⟨λx y, ⟨x.1 + y.1, add_mem _ x.2 y.2⟩⟩
instance : has_zero p := ⟨⟨0, zero_mem _⟩⟩
instance : has_neg p := ⟨λx, ⟨-x.1, neg_mem _ x.2⟩⟩
instance : has_scalar α p := ⟨λ c x, ⟨c • x.1, smul_mem _ c x.2⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_add (x y : p) : (↑(x + y) : β) = ↑x + ↑y := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : p) : β) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_neg (x : p) : ((-x : p) : β) = -x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_smul (r : α) (x : p) : ((r • x : p) : β) = r • ↑x := rfl
instance : add_comm_group p :=
by refine {add := (+), zero := 0, neg := has_neg.neg, ..};
{ intros, apply set_coe.ext, simp }
lemma coe_sub (x y : p) : (↑(x - y) : β) = ↑x - ↑y := by simp
instance : module α p :=
by refine {smul := (•), ..};
{ intros, apply set_coe.ext, simp [smul_add, add_smul, mul_smul] }
protected def subtype : p →ₗ[α] β :=
by refine {to_fun := coe, ..}; simp [coe_smul]
@[simp] theorem subtype_apply (x : p) : p.subtype x = x := rfl
end submodule
@[reducible] def ideal (α : Type u) [comm_ring α] := submodule α α
namespace ideal
variables [comm_ring α] (I : ideal α) {a b : α}
protected lemma zero_mem : (0 : α) ∈ I := I.zero_mem
protected lemma add_mem : a ∈ I → b ∈ I → a + b ∈ I := I.add_mem
lemma neg_mem_iff : -a ∈ I ↔ a ∈ I := I.neg_mem_iff
lemma add_mem_iff_left : b ∈ I → (a + b ∈ I ↔ a ∈ I) := I.add_mem_iff_left
lemma add_mem_iff_right : a ∈ I → (a + b ∈ I ↔ b ∈ I) := I.add_mem_iff_right
protected lemma sub_mem : a ∈ I → b ∈ I → a - b ∈ I := I.sub_mem
lemma mul_mem_left : b ∈ I → a * b ∈ I := I.smul_mem _
lemma mul_mem_right (h : a ∈ I) : a * b ∈ I := mul_comm b a ▸ I.mul_mem_left h
end ideal
/-- A vector space is the same as a module, except the scalar ring is actually
a field. (This adds commutativity of the multiplication and existence of inverses.)
This is the traditional generalization of spaces like `ℝ^n`, which have a natural
addition operation and a way to multiply them by real numbers, but no multiplication
operation between vectors. -/
class vector_space (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [discrete_field α] [add_comm_group β] extends module α β
instance discrete_field.to_vector_space {α : Type*} [discrete_field α] : vector_space α α :=
{ .. ring.to_module }
/-- Subspace of a vector space. Defined to equal `submodule`. -/
@[reducible] def subspace (α : Type u) (β : Type v)
[discrete_field α] [add_comm_group β] [vector_space α β] : Type v :=
submodule α β
instance subspace.vector_space {α β}
{f : discrete_field α} [add_comm_group β] [vector_space α β]
(p : subspace α β) : vector_space α p := {..submodule.module p}
namespace submodule
variables {R:discrete_field α} [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ]
variables [vector_space α β] [vector_space α γ]
variables (p p' : submodule α β)
variables {r : α} {x y : β}
include R
theorem smul_mem_iff (r0 : r ≠ 0) : r • x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ p :=
⟨λ h, by simpa [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel r0] using p.smul_mem (r⁻¹) h,
p.smul_mem r⟩
end submodule
|
41bab16376b4dc0a1b59aefa71d5a3a86cce6414 | 0d9b0a832bc57849732c5bd008a7a142f7e49656 | /src/helpers.lean | 55a66d8369d0e048e87e017923a21b168e8a91eb | [] | no_license | mirefek/sokoban.lean | bb9414af67894e4d8ce75f8c8d7031df02d371d0 | 451c92308afb4d3f8e566594b9751286f93b899b | refs/heads/master | 1,681,025,245,267 | 1,618,997,832,000 | 1,618,997,832,000 | 359,491,681 | 10 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,264 | lean | import data.list
import data.list.func
universe u
theorem get_succ {α : Type u} [inhabited α]
: ∀ (l : list α) (n : ℕ),
list.func.get n.succ l = list.func.get n l.tail :=
begin intros, cases l, simp, simp, end
theorem get_0_head {α : Type u} [inhabited α] (l : list α)
: list.func.get 0 l = list.head l :=
begin cases l, simp, simp, end
lemma list.sum_tl_hd {l : list ℕ} : l.sum = l.tail.sum + l.head :=
begin
cases l with h t, refl, simp, apply add_comm,
end
lemma list.sum_update (x : ℕ) : ∀ (l : list ℕ) (n : ℕ),
∃ c, l.sum = c + (list.func.get n l)
∧ (list.func.set x l n).sum = c + x
| l 0 := begin
existsi l.tail.sum,
split,
{ rw get_0_head, exact list.sum_tl_hd, },
{
have : ∀ y, y + x = y + (list.func.set x l 0).head, by simp [←get_0_head],
rw this,
have : l.tail = (list.func.set x l 0).tail,
{ cases l, simp, simp, },
rw this,
exact list.sum_tl_hd,
}
end
| [] (n+1) := begin
rcases list.sum_update [] n with ⟨c, IH1, IH2⟩,
existsi c, split, {
have : list.func.get (n + 1) list.nil = list.func.get n list.nil,
rw [list.func.get_nil, list.func.get_nil],
rw this, exact IH1,
}, {
simp [default, IH2],
}
end
| (h::t) (n+1) := begin
rcases list.sum_update t n with ⟨c, IH1, IH2⟩,
existsi h+c, simp, split, {
rw IH1, exact (add_assoc _ _ _).symm,
}, {
rw IH2, exact (add_assoc _ _ _).symm,
}
end
lemma list.set_map {α β : Type} [inhabited α] [inhabited β]
(a : α) (f : α → β) (Hdf : default β = f (default α)) : ∀ (l : list α) (n : ℕ),
list.func.set (f a) (list.map f l) n = list.map f (list.func.set a l n)
| [] 0 := by simp
| (h::t) 0 := by simp
| [] (n+1) := begin
simp, split, exact Hdf,
exact list.set_map [] n,
end
| (h::t) (n+1) := begin
simp, exact list.set_map t n,
end
lemma list.sum_map_update {α : Type} [inhabited α]
(f : α → ℕ) (Hdf : f (default α) = 0) (a : α) (l : list α) (n : ℕ)
: ∃ c, (l.map f).sum = c + f (list.func.get n l)
∧ ((list.func.set a l n).map f).sum = c + (f a)
:=
begin
rcases list.sum_update (f a) (list.map f l) n
with ⟨c, H1, H2⟩, existsi c, split,
{ rw H1, rw list.func.get_map', exact Hdf, },
{ rw ←H2, rw list.set_map, exact Hdf.symm, },
end
|
523b9ce9f39c8496d072f5a3546289010db29ffa | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/order/bounded_lattice.lean | 73ae921fc1b7946b2b2f83959d626f5ebcb2db90 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,509 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Defines bounded lattice type class hierarchy.
Includes the Prop and fun instances.
-/
import order.lattice data.option.basic
tactic.pi_instances
set_option old_structure_cmd true
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- Typeclass for the `⊤` (`\top`) notation -/
class has_top (α : Type u) := (top : α)
/-- Typeclass for the `⊥` (`\bot`) notation -/
class has_bot (α : Type u) := (bot : α)
notation `⊤` := has_top.top
notation `⊥` := has_bot.bot
attribute [pattern] has_bot.bot has_top.top
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- An `order_top` is a partial order with a maximal element.
(We could state this on preorders, but then it wouldn't be unique
so distinguishing one would seem odd.) -/
class order_top (α : Type u) extends has_top α, partial_order α :=
(le_top : ∀ a : α, a ≤ ⊤)
end prio
section order_top
variables [order_top α] {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem le_top : a ≤ ⊤ :=
order_top.le_top a
theorem top_unique (h : ⊤ ≤ a) : a = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top h
-- TODO: delete in favor of the next?
theorem eq_top_iff : a = ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ≤ a :=
⟨assume eq, eq.symm ▸ le_refl ⊤, top_unique⟩
@[simp] theorem top_le_iff : ⊤ ≤ a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨top_unique, λ h, h.symm ▸ le_refl ⊤⟩
@[simp] theorem not_top_lt : ¬ ⊤ < a :=
assume h, lt_irrefl a (lt_of_le_of_lt le_top h)
theorem eq_top_mono (h : a ≤ b) (h₂ : a = ⊤) : b = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 $ h₂ ▸ h
lemma lt_top_iff_ne_top : a < ⊤ ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq α,
haveI : decidable (⊤ ≤ a) := decidable_of_iff' _ top_le_iff,
by simp [-top_le_iff, lt_iff_le_not_le, not_iff_not.2 (@top_le_iff _ _ a)]
end
lemma ne_top_of_lt (h : a < b) : a ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 $ lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem ne_top_of_le_ne_top {a b : α} (hb : b ≠ ⊤) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≠ ⊤ :=
assume ha, hb $ top_unique $ ha ▸ hab
end order_top
theorem order_top.ext_top {α} {A B : order_top α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
(by haveI := A; exact ⊤ : α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ by rw ← H; apply le_top
theorem order_top.ext {α} {A B : order_top α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) : A = B :=
begin
haveI this := partial_order.ext H,
have tt := order_top.ext_top H,
cases A; cases B; injection this; congr'
end
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- An `order_bot` is a partial order with a minimal element.
(We could state this on preorders, but then it wouldn't be unique
so distinguishing one would seem odd.) -/
class order_bot (α : Type u) extends has_bot α, partial_order α :=
(bot_le : ∀ a : α, ⊥ ≤ a)
end prio
section order_bot
variables [order_bot α] {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem bot_le : ⊥ ≤ a := order_bot.bot_le a
theorem bot_unique (h : a ≤ ⊥) : a = ⊥ :=
le_antisymm h bot_le
-- TODO: delete?
theorem eq_bot_iff : a = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ ⊥ :=
⟨assume eq, eq.symm ▸ le_refl ⊥, bot_unique⟩
@[simp] theorem le_bot_iff : a ≤ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨bot_unique, assume h, h.symm ▸ le_refl ⊥⟩
@[simp] theorem not_lt_bot : ¬ a < ⊥ :=
assume h, lt_irrefl a (lt_of_lt_of_le h bot_le)
theorem ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot {a b : α} (hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hab : b ≤ a) : a ≠ ⊥ :=
assume ha, hb $ bot_unique $ ha ▸ hab
theorem eq_bot_mono (h : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b = ⊥) : a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 $ h₂ ▸ h
lemma bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : ⊥ < a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq α,
haveI : decidable (a ≤ ⊥) := decidable_of_iff' _ le_bot_iff,
simp [-le_bot_iff, lt_iff_le_not_le, not_iff_not.2 (@le_bot_iff _ _ a)]
end
lemma ne_bot_of_gt (h : a < b) : b ≠ ⊥ :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le h
end order_bot
theorem order_bot.ext_bot {α} {A B : order_bot α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
(by haveI := A; exact ⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ by rw ← H; apply bot_le
theorem order_bot.ext {α} {A B : order_bot α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) : A = B :=
begin
haveI this := partial_order.ext H,
have tt := order_bot.ext_bot H,
cases A; cases B; injection this; congr'
end
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A `semilattice_sup_top` is a semilattice with top and join. -/
class semilattice_sup_top (α : Type u) extends order_top α, semilattice_sup α
end prio
section semilattice_sup_top
variables [semilattice_sup_top α] {a : α}
@[simp] theorem top_sup_eq : ⊤ ⊔ a = ⊤ :=
sup_of_le_left le_top
@[simp] theorem sup_top_eq : a ⊔ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
sup_of_le_right le_top
end semilattice_sup_top
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A `semilattice_sup_bot` is a semilattice with bottom and join. -/
class semilattice_sup_bot (α : Type u) extends order_bot α, semilattice_sup α
end prio
section semilattice_sup_bot
variables [semilattice_sup_bot α] {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem bot_sup_eq : ⊥ ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right bot_le
@[simp] theorem sup_bot_eq : a ⊔ ⊥ = a :=
sup_of_le_left bot_le
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_bot_iff : a ⊔ b = ⊥ ↔ (a = ⊥ ∧ b = ⊥) :=
by rw [eq_bot_iff, sup_le_iff]; simp
end semilattice_sup_bot
instance nat.semilattice_sup_bot : semilattice_sup_bot ℕ :=
{ bot := 0, bot_le := nat.zero_le, .. nat.distrib_lattice }
private def bot_aux (s : set ℕ) [decidable_pred s] [h : nonempty s] : s :=
have ∃ x, x ∈ s, from nonempty.elim h (λ x, ⟨x.1, x.2⟩),
⟨nat.find this, nat.find_spec this⟩
instance nat.subtype.semilattice_sup_bot (s : set ℕ) [decidable_pred s] [h : nonempty s] :
semilattice_sup_bot s :=
{ bot := bot_aux s,
bot_le := λ x, nat.find_min' _ x.2,
..subtype.linear_order s,
..lattice_of_decidable_linear_order }
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A `semilattice_inf_top` is a semilattice with top and meet. -/
class semilattice_inf_top (α : Type u) extends order_top α, semilattice_inf α
end prio
section semilattice_inf_top
variables [semilattice_inf_top α] {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem top_inf_eq : ⊤ ⊓ a = a :=
inf_of_le_right le_top
@[simp] theorem inf_top_eq : a ⊓ ⊤ = a :=
inf_of_le_left le_top
@[simp] theorem inf_eq_top_iff : a ⊓ b = ⊤ ↔ (a = ⊤ ∧ b = ⊤) :=
by rw [eq_top_iff, le_inf_iff]; simp
end semilattice_inf_top
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A `semilattice_inf_bot` is a semilattice with bottom and meet. -/
class semilattice_inf_bot (α : Type u) extends order_bot α, semilattice_inf α
end prio
section semilattice_inf_bot
variables [semilattice_inf_bot α] {a : α}
@[simp] theorem bot_inf_eq : ⊥ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
inf_of_le_left bot_le
@[simp] theorem inf_bot_eq : a ⊓ ⊥ = ⊥ :=
inf_of_le_right bot_le
end semilattice_inf_bot
/- Bounded lattices -/
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A bounded lattice is a lattice with a top and bottom element,
denoted `⊤` and `⊥` respectively. This allows for the interpretation
of all finite suprema and infima, taking `inf ∅ = ⊤` and `sup ∅ = ⊥`. -/
class bounded_lattice (α : Type u) extends lattice α, order_top α, order_bot α
end prio
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_inf_top_of_bounded_lattice (α : Type u) [bl : bounded_lattice α] : semilattice_inf_top α :=
{ le_top := assume x, @le_top α _ x, ..bl }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_inf_bot_of_bounded_lattice (α : Type u) [bl : bounded_lattice α] : semilattice_inf_bot α :=
{ bot_le := assume x, @bot_le α _ x, ..bl }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_sup_top_of_bounded_lattice (α : Type u) [bl : bounded_lattice α] : semilattice_sup_top α :=
{ le_top := assume x, @le_top α _ x, ..bl }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_sup_bot_of_bounded_lattice (α : Type u) [bl : bounded_lattice α] : semilattice_sup_bot α :=
{ bot_le := assume x, @bot_le α _ x, ..bl }
theorem bounded_lattice.ext {α} {A B : bounded_lattice α}
(H : ∀ x y : α, (by haveI := A; exact x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) : A = B :=
begin
haveI H1 : @bounded_lattice.to_lattice α A =
@bounded_lattice.to_lattice α B := lattice.ext H,
haveI H2 := order_bot.ext H,
haveI H3 : @bounded_lattice.to_order_top α A =
@bounded_lattice.to_order_top α B := order_top.ext H,
have tt := order_bot.ext_bot H,
cases A; cases B; injection H1; injection H2; injection H3; congr'
end
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A bounded distributive lattice is exactly what it sounds like. -/
class bounded_distrib_lattice α extends distrib_lattice α, bounded_lattice α
end prio
lemma inf_eq_bot_iff_le_compl {α : Type u} [bounded_distrib_lattice α] {a b c : α}
(h₁ : b ⊔ c = ⊤) (h₂ : b ⊓ c = ⊥) : a ⊓ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ c :=
⟨assume : a ⊓ b = ⊥,
calc a ≤ a ⊓ (b ⊔ c) : by simp [h₁]
... = (a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a ⊓ c) : by simp [inf_sup_left]
... ≤ c : by simp [this, inf_le_right],
assume : a ≤ c,
bot_unique $
calc a ⊓ b ≤ b ⊓ c : by rw [inf_comm]; exact inf_le_inf (le_refl _) this
... = ⊥ : h₂⟩
/- Prop instance -/
instance bounded_lattice_Prop : bounded_lattice Prop :=
{ bounded_lattice .
le := λa b, a → b,
le_refl := assume _, id,
le_trans := assume a b c f g, g ∘ f,
le_antisymm := assume a b Hab Hba, propext ⟨Hab, Hba⟩,
sup := or,
le_sup_left := @or.inl,
le_sup_right := @or.inr,
sup_le := assume a b c, or.rec,
inf := and,
inf_le_left := @and.left,
inf_le_right := @and.right,
le_inf := assume a b c Hab Hac Ha, and.intro (Hab Ha) (Hac Ha),
top := true,
le_top := assume a Ha, true.intro,
bot := false,
bot_le := @false.elim }
section logic
variable [preorder α]
theorem monotone_and {p q : α → Prop} (m_p : monotone p) (m_q : monotone q) :
monotone (λx, p x ∧ q x) :=
assume a b h, and.imp (m_p h) (m_q h)
-- Note: by finish [monotone] doesn't work
theorem monotone_or {p q : α → Prop} (m_p : monotone p) (m_q : monotone q) :
monotone (λx, p x ∨ q x) :=
assume a b h, or.imp (m_p h) (m_q h)
end logic
/- Function lattices -/
/- TODO:
* build up the lattice hierarchy for `fun`-functor piecewise. semilattic_*, bounded_lattice, lattice ...
* can this be generalized to the dependent function space?
-/
instance pi.bounded_lattice {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [bounded_lattice β] :
bounded_lattice (α → β) :=
by pi_instance
/-- Attach `⊥` to a type. -/
def with_bot (α : Type*) := option α
namespace with_bot
meta instance {α} [has_to_format α] : has_to_format (with_bot α) :=
{ to_format := λ x,
match x with
| none := "⊥"
| (some x) := to_fmt x
end }
instance : has_coe_t α (with_bot α) := ⟨some⟩
instance has_bot : has_bot (with_bot α) := ⟨none⟩
instance : inhabited (with_bot α) := ⟨⊥⟩
lemma none_eq_bot : (none : with_bot α) = (⊥ : with_bot α) := rfl
lemma some_eq_coe (a : α) : (some a : with_bot α) = (↑a : with_bot α) := rfl
theorem coe_eq_coe {a b : α} : (a : with_bot α) = b ↔ a = b :=
by rw [← option.some.inj_eq a b]; refl
@[priority 10]
instance has_lt [has_lt α] : has_lt (with_bot α) :=
{ lt := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∃ b ∈ o₂, ∀ a ∈ o₁, a < b }
@[simp] theorem some_lt_some [has_lt α] {a b : α} :
@has_lt.lt (with_bot α) _ (some a) (some b) ↔ a < b :=
by simp [(<)]
instance [preorder α] : preorder (with_bot α) :=
{ le := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∀ a ∈ o₁, ∃ b ∈ o₂, a ≤ b,
lt := (<),
lt_iff_le_not_le := by intros; cases a; cases b;
simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]; simp [(<)];
split; refl,
le_refl := λ o a ha, ⟨a, ha, le_refl _⟩,
le_trans := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha,
let ⟨b, hb, ab⟩ := h₁ a ha, ⟨c, hc, bc⟩ := h₂ b hb in
⟨c, hc, le_trans ab bc⟩ }
instance partial_order [partial_order α] : partial_order (with_bot α) :=
{ le_antisymm := λ o₁ o₂ h₁ h₂, begin
cases o₁ with a,
{ cases o₂ with b, {refl},
rcases h₂ b rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩ },
{ rcases h₁ a rfl with ⟨b, ⟨⟩, h₁'⟩,
rcases h₂ b rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h₂'⟩,
rw le_antisymm h₁' h₂' }
end,
.. with_bot.preorder }
instance order_bot [partial_order α] : order_bot (with_bot α) :=
{ bot_le := λ a a' h, option.no_confusion h,
..with_bot.partial_order, ..with_bot.has_bot }
@[simp] theorem coe_le_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} :
(a : with_bot α) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, by rcases h a rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h⟩; exact h,
λ h a' e, option.some_inj.1 e ▸ ⟨b, rfl, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem some_le_some [partial_order α] {a b : α} :
@has_le.le (with_bot α) _ (some a) (some b) ↔ a ≤ b := coe_le_coe
theorem coe_le [partial_order α] {a b : α} :
∀ {o : option α}, b ∈ o → ((a : with_bot α) ≤ o ↔ a ≤ b)
| _ rfl := coe_le_coe
lemma coe_lt_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} : (a : with_bot α) < b ↔ a < b := some_lt_some
lemma bot_lt_some [partial_order α] (a : α) : (⊥ : with_bot α) < some a :=
lt_of_le_of_ne bot_le (λ h, option.no_confusion h)
lemma bot_lt_coe [partial_order α] (a : α) : (⊥ : with_bot α) < a := bot_lt_some a
instance linear_order [linear_order α] : linear_order (with_bot α) :=
{ le_total := λ o₁ o₂, begin
cases o₁ with a, {exact or.inl bot_le},
cases o₂ with b, {exact or.inr bot_le},
simp [le_total]
end,
..with_bot.partial_order }
instance decidable_lt [has_lt α] [@decidable_rel α (<)] : @decidable_rel (with_bot α) (<)
| none (some x) := is_true $ by existsi [x,rfl]; rintros _ ⟨⟩
| (some x) (some y) :=
if h : x < y
then is_true $ by simp *
else is_false $ by simp *
| x none := is_false $ by rintro ⟨a,⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
instance decidable_linear_order [decidable_linear_order α] : decidable_linear_order (with_bot α) :=
{ decidable_le := λ a b, begin
cases a with a,
{ exact is_true bot_le },
cases b with b,
{ exact is_false (mt (le_antisymm bot_le) (by simp)) },
{ exact decidable_of_iff _ some_le_some }
end,
..with_bot.linear_order }
instance semilattice_sup [semilattice_sup α] : semilattice_sup_bot (with_bot α) :=
{ sup := option.lift_or_get (⊔),
le_sup_left := λ o₁ o₂ a ha,
by cases ha; cases o₂; simp [option.lift_or_get],
le_sup_right := λ o₁ o₂ a ha,
by cases ha; cases o₁; simp [option.lift_or_get],
sup_le := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha, begin
cases o₁ with b; cases o₂ with c; cases ha,
{ exact h₂ a rfl },
{ exact h₁ a rfl },
{ rcases h₁ b rfl with ⟨d, ⟨⟩, h₁'⟩,
simp at h₂,
exact ⟨d, rfl, sup_le h₁' h₂⟩ }
end,
..with_bot.order_bot }
instance semilattice_inf [semilattice_inf α] : semilattice_inf_bot (with_bot α) :=
{ inf := λ o₁ o₂, o₁.bind (λ a, o₂.map (λ b, a ⊓ b)),
inf_le_left := λ o₁ o₂ a ha, begin
simp at ha, rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl, c, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, inf_le_left⟩
end,
inf_le_right := λ o₁ o₂ a ha, begin
simp at ha, rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl, c, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, inf_le_right⟩
end,
le_inf := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha, begin
cases ha,
rcases h₁ a rfl with ⟨b, ⟨⟩, ab⟩,
rcases h₂ a rfl with ⟨c, ⟨⟩, ac⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, le_inf ab ac⟩
end,
..with_bot.order_bot }
instance lattice [lattice α] : lattice (with_bot α) :=
{ ..with_bot.semilattice_sup, ..with_bot.semilattice_inf }
theorem lattice_eq_DLO [decidable_linear_order α] :
lattice_of_decidable_linear_order = @with_bot.lattice α _ :=
lattice.ext $ λ x y, iff.rfl
theorem sup_eq_max [decidable_linear_order α] (x y : with_bot α) : x ⊔ y = max x y :=
by rw [← sup_eq_max, lattice_eq_DLO]
theorem inf_eq_min [decidable_linear_order α] (x y : with_bot α) : x ⊓ y = min x y :=
by rw [← inf_eq_min, lattice_eq_DLO]
instance order_top [order_top α] : order_top (with_bot α) :=
{ top := some ⊤,
le_top := λ o a ha, by cases ha; exact ⟨_, rfl, le_top⟩,
..with_bot.partial_order }
instance bounded_lattice [bounded_lattice α] : bounded_lattice (with_bot α) :=
{ ..with_bot.lattice, ..with_bot.order_top, ..with_bot.order_bot }
lemma well_founded_lt [partial_order α] (h : well_founded ((<) : α → α → Prop)) :
well_founded ((<) : with_bot α → with_bot α → Prop) :=
have acc_bot : acc ((<) : with_bot α → with_bot α → Prop) ⊥ :=
acc.intro _ (λ a ha, (not_le_of_gt ha bot_le).elim),
⟨λ a, option.rec_on a acc_bot (λ a, acc.intro _ (λ b, option.rec_on b (λ _, acc_bot)
(λ b, well_founded.induction h b
(show ∀ b : α, (∀ c, c < b → (c : with_bot α) < a →
acc ((<) : with_bot α → with_bot α → Prop) c) → (b : with_bot α) < a →
acc ((<) : with_bot α → with_bot α → Prop) b,
from λ b ih hba, acc.intro _ (λ c, option.rec_on c (λ _, acc_bot)
(λ c hc, ih _ (some_lt_some.1 hc) (lt_trans hc hba)))))))⟩
instance densely_ordered [partial_order α] [densely_ordered α] [no_bot_order α] :
densely_ordered (with_bot α) :=
⟨ assume a b,
match a, b with
| a, none := assume h : a < ⊥, (not_lt_bot h).elim
| none, some b := assume h, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := no_bot b in ⟨a, bot_lt_coe a, coe_lt_coe.2 ha⟩
| some a, some b := assume h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := dense (coe_lt_coe.1 h) in
⟨a, coe_lt_coe.2 ha₁, coe_lt_coe.2 ha₂⟩
end⟩
end with_bot
--TODO(Mario): Construct using order dual on with_bot
def with_top (α : Type*) := option α
namespace with_top
meta instance {α} [has_to_format α] : has_to_format (with_top α) :=
{ to_format := λ x,
match x with
| none := "⊤"
| (some x) := to_fmt x
end }
instance : has_coe_t α (with_top α) := ⟨some⟩
instance has_top : has_top (with_top α) := ⟨none⟩
instance : inhabited (with_top α) := ⟨⊤⟩
lemma none_eq_top : (none : with_top α) = (⊤ : with_top α) := rfl
lemma some_eq_coe (a : α) : (some a : with_top α) = (↑a : with_top α) := rfl
theorem coe_eq_coe {a b : α} : (a : with_top α) = b ↔ a = b :=
by rw [← option.some.inj_eq a b]; refl
@[simp] theorem top_ne_coe {a : α} : ⊤ ≠ (a : with_top α) .
@[simp] theorem coe_ne_top {a : α} : (a : with_top α) ≠ ⊤ .
@[priority 10]
instance has_lt [has_lt α] : has_lt (with_top α) :=
{ lt := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∃ b ∈ o₁, ∀ a ∈ o₂, b < a }
@[priority 10]
instance has_le [has_le α] : has_le (with_top α) :=
{ le := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∀ a ∈ o₂, ∃ b ∈ o₁, b ≤ a }
@[simp] theorem some_lt_some [has_lt α] {a b : α} :
@has_lt.lt (with_top α) _ (some a) (some b) ↔ a < b :=
by simp [(<)]
@[simp] theorem some_le_some [has_le α] {a b : α} :
@has_le.le (with_top α) _ (some a) (some b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simp [(≤)]
@[simp] theorem none_le [has_le α] {a : with_top α} :
@has_le.le (with_top α) _ a none :=
by simp [(≤)]
@[simp] theorem none_lt_some [has_lt α] {a : α} :
@has_lt.lt (with_top α) _ (some a) none :=
by simp [(<)]; existsi a; refl
instance [preorder α] : preorder (with_top α) :=
{ le := λ o₁ o₂ : option α, ∀ a ∈ o₂, ∃ b ∈ o₁, b ≤ a,
lt := (<),
lt_iff_le_not_le := by { intros; cases a; cases b;
simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]; simp [(<),(≤)] },
le_refl := λ o a ha, ⟨a, ha, le_refl _⟩,
le_trans := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ c hc,
let ⟨b, hb, bc⟩ := h₂ c hc, ⟨a, ha, ab⟩ := h₁ b hb in
⟨a, ha, le_trans ab bc⟩,
}
instance partial_order [partial_order α] : partial_order (with_top α) :=
{ le_antisymm := λ o₁ o₂ h₁ h₂, begin
cases o₂ with b,
{ cases o₁ with a, {refl},
rcases h₂ a rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩ },
{ rcases h₁ b rfl with ⟨a, ⟨⟩, h₁'⟩,
rcases h₂ a rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h₂'⟩,
rw le_antisymm h₁' h₂' }
end,
.. with_top.preorder }
instance order_top [partial_order α] : order_top (with_top α) :=
{ le_top := λ a a' h, option.no_confusion h,
..with_top.partial_order, .. with_top.has_top }
@[simp] theorem coe_le_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} :
(a : with_top α) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, by rcases h b rfl with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h⟩; exact h,
λ h a' e, option.some_inj.1 e ▸ ⟨a, rfl, h⟩⟩
theorem le_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} :
∀ {o : option α}, a ∈ o →
(@has_le.le (with_top α) _ o b ↔ a ≤ b)
| _ rfl := coe_le_coe
theorem le_coe_iff [partial_order α] (b : α) : ∀(x : with_top α), x ≤ b ↔ (∃a:α, x = a ∧ a ≤ b)
| (some a) := by simp [some_eq_coe, coe_eq_coe]
| none := by simp [none_eq_top]
theorem coe_le_iff [partial_order α] (a : α) : ∀(x : with_top α), ↑a ≤ x ↔ (∀b:α, x = ↑b → a ≤ b)
| (some b) := by simp [some_eq_coe, coe_eq_coe]
| none := by simp [none_eq_top]
theorem lt_iff_exists_coe [partial_order α] : ∀(a b : with_top α), a < b ↔ (∃p:α, a = p ∧ ↑p < b)
| (some a) b := by simp [some_eq_coe, coe_eq_coe]
| none b := by simp [none_eq_top]
lemma coe_lt_coe [partial_order α] {a b : α} : (a : with_top α) < b ↔ a < b := some_lt_some
lemma coe_lt_top [partial_order α] (a : α) : (a : with_top α) < ⊤ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne le_top (λ h, option.no_confusion h)
lemma not_top_le_coe [partial_order α] (a : α) : ¬ (⊤:with_top α) ≤ ↑a :=
assume h, (lt_irrefl ⊤ (lt_of_le_of_lt h (coe_lt_top a))).elim
instance linear_order [linear_order α] : linear_order (with_top α) :=
{ le_total := λ o₁ o₂, begin
cases o₁ with a, {exact or.inr le_top},
cases o₂ with b, {exact or.inl le_top},
simp [le_total]
end,
..with_top.partial_order }
instance decidable_linear_order [decidable_linear_order α] : decidable_linear_order (with_top α) :=
{ decidable_le := λ a b, begin
cases b with b,
{ exact is_true le_top },
cases a with a,
{ exact is_false (mt (le_antisymm le_top) (by simp)) },
{ exact decidable_of_iff _ some_le_some }
end,
..with_top.linear_order }
instance semilattice_inf [semilattice_inf α] : semilattice_inf_top (with_top α) :=
{ inf := option.lift_or_get (⊓),
inf_le_left := λ o₁ o₂ a ha,
by cases ha; cases o₂; simp [option.lift_or_get],
inf_le_right := λ o₁ o₂ a ha,
by cases ha; cases o₁; simp [option.lift_or_get],
le_inf := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha, begin
cases o₂ with b; cases o₃ with c; cases ha,
{ exact h₂ a rfl },
{ exact h₁ a rfl },
{ rcases h₁ b rfl with ⟨d, ⟨⟩, h₁'⟩,
simp at h₂,
exact ⟨d, rfl, le_inf h₁' h₂⟩ }
end,
..with_top.order_top }
lemma coe_inf [semilattice_inf α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊓ b : α) : with_top α) = a ⊓ b := rfl
instance semilattice_sup [semilattice_sup α] : semilattice_sup_top (with_top α) :=
{ sup := λ o₁ o₂, o₁.bind (λ a, o₂.map (λ b, a ⊔ b)),
le_sup_left := λ o₁ o₂ a ha, begin
simp at ha, rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl, c, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, le_sup_left⟩
end,
le_sup_right := λ o₁ o₂ a ha, begin
simp at ha, rcases ha with ⟨b, rfl, c, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, le_sup_right⟩
end,
sup_le := λ o₁ o₂ o₃ h₁ h₂ a ha, begin
cases ha,
rcases h₁ a rfl with ⟨b, ⟨⟩, ab⟩,
rcases h₂ a rfl with ⟨c, ⟨⟩, ac⟩,
exact ⟨_, rfl, sup_le ab ac⟩
end,
..with_top.order_top }
lemma coe_sup [semilattice_sup α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊔ b : α) : with_top α) = a ⊔ b := rfl
instance lattice [lattice α] : lattice (with_top α) :=
{ ..with_top.semilattice_sup, ..with_top.semilattice_inf }
theorem lattice_eq_DLO [decidable_linear_order α] :
lattice_of_decidable_linear_order = @with_top.lattice α _ :=
lattice.ext $ λ x y, iff.rfl
theorem sup_eq_max [decidable_linear_order α] (x y : with_top α) : x ⊔ y = max x y :=
by rw [← sup_eq_max, lattice_eq_DLO]
theorem inf_eq_min [decidable_linear_order α] (x y : with_top α) : x ⊓ y = min x y :=
by rw [← inf_eq_min, lattice_eq_DLO]
instance order_bot [order_bot α] : order_bot (with_top α) :=
{ bot := some ⊥,
bot_le := λ o a ha, by cases ha; exact ⟨_, rfl, bot_le⟩,
..with_top.partial_order }
instance bounded_lattice [bounded_lattice α] : bounded_lattice (with_top α) :=
{ ..with_top.lattice, ..with_top.order_top, ..with_top.order_bot }
lemma well_founded_lt {α : Type*} [partial_order α] (h : well_founded ((<) : α → α → Prop)) :
well_founded ((<) : with_top α → with_top α → Prop) :=
have acc_some : ∀ a : α, acc ((<) : with_top α → with_top α → Prop) (some a) :=
λ a, acc.intro _ (well_founded.induction h a
(show ∀ b, (∀ c, c < b → ∀ d : with_top α, d < some c → acc (<) d) →
∀ y : with_top α, y < some b → acc (<) y,
from λ b ih c, option.rec_on c (λ hc, (not_lt_of_ge le_top hc).elim)
(λ c hc, acc.intro _ (ih _ (some_lt_some.1 hc))))),
⟨λ a, option.rec_on a (acc.intro _ (λ y, option.rec_on y (λ h, (lt_irrefl _ h).elim)
(λ _ _, acc_some _))) acc_some⟩
instance densely_ordered [partial_order α] [densely_ordered α] [no_top_order α] :
densely_ordered (with_top α) :=
⟨ assume a b,
match a, b with
| none, a := assume h : ⊤ < a, (not_top_lt h).elim
| some a, none := assume h, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := no_top a in ⟨b, coe_lt_coe.2 hb, coe_lt_top b⟩
| some a, some b := assume h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := dense (coe_lt_coe.1 h) in
⟨a, coe_lt_coe.2 ha₁, coe_lt_coe.2 ha₂⟩
end⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_coe_btwn [partial_order α] [densely_ordered α] [no_top_order α]
{a b : with_top α} :
(a < b) ↔ (∃ x : α, a < ↑x ∧ ↑x < b) :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨y, hy⟩ := dense h, ⟨x, hx⟩ := (lt_iff_exists_coe _ _).1 hy.2 in ⟨x, hx.1 ▸ hy⟩,
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, lt_trans hx.1 hx.2⟩
end with_top
namespace order_dual
variable (α)
instance [has_bot α] : has_top (order_dual α) := ⟨(⊥ : α)⟩
instance [has_top α] : has_bot (order_dual α) := ⟨(⊤ : α)⟩
instance [order_bot α] : order_top (order_dual α) :=
{ le_top := @bot_le α _,
.. order_dual.partial_order α, .. order_dual.has_top α }
instance [order_top α] : order_bot (order_dual α) :=
{ bot_le := @le_top α _,
.. order_dual.partial_order α, .. order_dual.has_bot α }
instance [semilattice_inf_bot α] : semilattice_sup_top (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.semilattice_sup α, .. order_dual.order_top α }
instance [semilattice_inf_top α] : semilattice_sup_bot (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.semilattice_sup α, .. order_dual.order_bot α }
instance [semilattice_sup_bot α] : semilattice_inf_top (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.semilattice_inf α, .. order_dual.order_top α }
instance [semilattice_sup_top α] : semilattice_inf_bot (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.semilattice_inf α, .. order_dual.order_bot α }
instance [bounded_lattice α] : bounded_lattice (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.lattice α, .. order_dual.order_top α, .. order_dual.order_bot α }
instance [bounded_distrib_lattice α] : bounded_distrib_lattice (order_dual α) :=
{ .. order_dual.bounded_lattice α, .. order_dual.distrib_lattice α }
end order_dual
namespace prod
variables (α β)
instance [has_top α] [has_top β] : has_top (α × β) := ⟨⟨⊤, ⊤⟩⟩
instance [has_bot α] [has_bot β] : has_bot (α × β) := ⟨⟨⊥, ⊥⟩⟩
instance [order_top α] [order_top β] : order_top (α × β) :=
{ le_top := assume a, ⟨le_top, le_top⟩,
.. prod.partial_order α β, .. prod.has_top α β }
instance [order_bot α] [order_bot β] : order_bot (α × β) :=
{ bot_le := assume a, ⟨bot_le, bot_le⟩,
.. prod.partial_order α β, .. prod.has_bot α β }
instance [semilattice_sup_top α] [semilattice_sup_top β] : semilattice_sup_top (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.semilattice_sup α β, .. prod.order_top α β }
instance [semilattice_inf_top α] [semilattice_inf_top β] : semilattice_inf_top (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.semilattice_inf α β, .. prod.order_top α β }
instance [semilattice_sup_bot α] [semilattice_sup_bot β] : semilattice_sup_bot (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.semilattice_sup α β, .. prod.order_bot α β }
instance [semilattice_inf_bot α] [semilattice_inf_bot β] : semilattice_inf_bot (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.semilattice_inf α β, .. prod.order_bot α β }
instance [bounded_lattice α] [bounded_lattice β] : bounded_lattice (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.lattice α β, .. prod.order_top α β, .. prod.order_bot α β }
instance [bounded_distrib_lattice α] [bounded_distrib_lattice β] :
bounded_distrib_lattice (α × β) :=
{ .. prod.bounded_lattice α β, .. prod.distrib_lattice α β }
end prod
|
31b91d92b27d73fe5a5b9e4aa9fd2d498dc06296 | 4b846d8dabdc64e7ea03552bad8f7fa74763fc67 | /library/init/meta/match_tactic.lean | a79d0e386ef74866e571c7ba318a03162833a899 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pacchiano/lean | 9324b33f3ac3b5c5647285160f9f6ea8d0d767dc | fdadada3a970377a6df8afcd629a6f2eab6e84e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,357,380,399 | 1,489,870,101,000 | 1,489,870,101,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,493 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic init.function
namespace tactic
meta structure pattern :=
/- Term to match. -/
(target : expr)
/- Set of universes that is instantiated for each successful match. -/
(uoutput : list level)
/- Set of terms that is instantiated for each successful match. -/
(moutput : list expr)
/- Number of (temporary) universe meta-variables in this pattern. -/
(nuvars : nat)
/- Number of (temporary) meta-variables in this pattern. -/
(nmvars : nat)
/- (mk_pattern ls es t u o) creates a new pattern with (length ls) universe meta-variables and (length es) meta-variables.
In the produced pattern p, we have that
- (pattern.target p) is the term t where the universes ls and expressions es have been replaced with temporary meta-variables.
- (pattern.uoutput p) is the list u where the universes ls have been replaced with temporary meta-variables.
- (pattern.moutput p) is the list o where the universes ls and expressions es have been replaced with temporary meta-variables.
- (pattern.nuvars p) = length ls
- (pattern.nmvars p) = length es
The tactic fails if o and the types of es do not contain all universes ls and expressions es. -/
meta constant mk_pattern : list level → list expr → expr → list level → list expr → tactic pattern
/- (mk_pattern_core m p e) matches (pattern.target p) and e using transparency m.
If the matching is successful, then return the instantiation of (pattern.output p).
The tactic fails if not all (temporary) meta-variables are assigned. -/
meta constant match_pattern_core : transparency → pattern → expr → tactic (list level × list expr)
meta def match_pattern (p : pattern) (e : expr) : tactic (list expr) :=
fmap prod.snd (match_pattern_core semireducible p e)
open expr
/- Helper function for converting a term (λ x_1 ... x_n, t) into a pattern
where x_1 ... x_n are metavariables -/
private meta def to_pattern_core : expr → tactic (expr × list expr)
| (lam n bi d b) := do
id ← mk_fresh_name,
let x := local_const id n bi d,
let new_b := instantiate_var b x,
(p, xs) ← to_pattern_core new_b,
return (p, x::xs)
| e := return (e, [])
/- Given a pre-term of the form (λ x_1 ... x_n, t[x_1, ..., x_n]), converts it
into the pattern t[?x_1, ..., ?x_n] -/
meta def pexpr_to_pattern (p : pexpr) : tactic pattern :=
do e ← to_expr p,
(new_p, xs) ← to_pattern_core e,
mk_pattern [] xs new_p [] xs
/- Convert pre-term into a pattern and try to match e.
Given p of the form (λ x_1 ... x_n, t[x_1, ..., x_n]), a successful
match will produce a list of length n. -/
meta def match_expr (p : pexpr) (e : expr) : tactic (list expr) :=
do new_p ← pexpr_to_pattern p,
match_pattern new_p e
private meta def match_subexpr_core : pattern → list expr → tactic (list expr)
| p [] := failed
| p (e::es) :=
match_pattern p e
<|>
match_subexpr_core p es
<|>
if is_app e then match_subexpr_core p (get_app_args e)
else failed
/- Similar to match_expr, but it tries to match a subexpression of e.
Remark: the procedure does not go inside binders. -/
meta def match_subexpr (p : pexpr) (e : expr) : tactic (list expr) :=
do new_p ← pexpr_to_pattern p,
match_subexpr_core new_p [e]
/- Match the main goal target. -/
meta def match_target (p : pexpr) : tactic (list expr) :=
target >>= match_expr p
/- Match a subterm in the main goal target. -/
meta def match_target_subexpr (p : pexpr) : tactic (list expr) :=
target >>= match_subexpr p
private meta def match_hypothesis_core : pattern → list expr → tactic (expr × list expr)
| p [] := failed
| p (h::hs) := do
h_type ← infer_type h,
(do r ← match_pattern p h_type, return (h, r))
<|>
match_hypothesis_core p hs
/- Match hypothesis in the main goal target.
The result is pair (hypothesis, substitution). -/
meta def match_hypothesis (p : pexpr) : tactic (expr × list expr) :=
do ctx ← local_context,
new_p ← pexpr_to_pattern p,
match_hypothesis_core new_p ctx
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format pattern :=
⟨λp, do
t ← pp p^.target,
mo ← pp p^.moutput,
uo ← pp p^.uoutput,
u ← pp p^.nuvars,
m ← pp p^.nmvars,
return $ to_fmt "pattern.mk (" ++ t ++ ") " ++ uo ++ " " ++ mo ++ " " ++ u ++ " " ++ m ++ "" ⟩
end tactic
|
b4a5a697503a5da8c3522d673838624001896854 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/topology/algebra/uniform_convergence.lean | ada5314adc63df2c1b7c59cdc8cc6dd9afaaad28 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,766 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import topology.uniform_space.uniform_convergence_topology
import analysis.locally_convex.bounded
import topology.algebra.filter_basis
/-!
# Algebraic facts about the topology of uniform convergence
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file contains algebraic compatibility results about the uniform structure of uniform
convergence / `𝔖`-convergence. They will mostly be useful for defining strong topologies on the
space of continuous linear maps between two topological vector spaces.
## Main statements
* `uniform_fun.uniform_group` : if `G` is a uniform group, then `α →ᵤ G` a uniform group
* `uniform_on_fun.uniform_group` : if `G` is a uniform group, then for any `𝔖 : set (set α)`,
`α →ᵤ[𝔖] G` a uniform group.
* `uniform_on_fun.has_continuous_smul_of_image_bounded` : let `E` be a TVS, `𝔖 : set (set α)` and
`H` a submodule of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] E`. If the image of any `S ∈ 𝔖` by any `u ∈ H` is bounded (in the
sense of `bornology.is_vonN_bounded`), then `H`, equipped with the topology induced from
`α →ᵤ[𝔖] E`, is a TVS.
## Implementation notes
Like in `topology/uniform_space/uniform_convergence_topology`, we use the type aliases
`uniform_fun` (denoted `α →ᵤ β`) and `uniform_on_fun` (denoted `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`) for functions from `α`
to `β` endowed with the structures of uniform convergence and `𝔖`-convergence.
## TODO
* `uniform_on_fun.has_continuous_smul_of_image_bounded` unnecessarily asks for `𝔖` to be
nonempty and directed. This will be easy to solve once we know that replacing `𝔖` by its
***noncovering*** bornology (i.e ***not*** what `bornology` currently refers to in mathlib)
doesn't change the topology.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
* [N. Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
## Tags
uniform convergence, strong dual
-/
open filter
open_locale topology pointwise uniform_convergence
section algebraic_instances
variables {α β ι R : Type*} {𝔖 : set $ set α}
@[to_additive] instance [monoid β] : monoid (α →ᵤ β) := pi.monoid
@[to_additive] instance [monoid β] : monoid (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := pi.monoid
@[to_additive] instance [comm_monoid β] : comm_monoid (α →ᵤ β) := pi.comm_monoid
@[to_additive] instance [comm_monoid β] : comm_monoid (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := pi.comm_monoid
@[to_additive] instance [group β] : group (α →ᵤ β) := pi.group
@[to_additive] instance [group β] : group (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := pi.group
@[to_additive] instance [comm_group β] : comm_group (α →ᵤ β) := pi.comm_group
@[to_additive] instance [comm_group β] : comm_group (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := pi.comm_group
instance [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid β] [module R β] : module R (α →ᵤ β) := pi.module _ _ _
instance [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid β] [module R β] : module R (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := pi.module _ _ _
end algebraic_instances
section group
variables {α G ι : Type*} [group G] {𝔖 : set $ set α} [uniform_space G] [uniform_group G]
/-- If `G` is a uniform group, then `α →ᵤ G` is a uniform group as well. -/
@[to_additive "If `G` is a uniform additive group, then `α →ᵤ G` is a uniform additive group
as well."]
instance : uniform_group (α →ᵤ G) :=
-- Since `(/) : G × G → G` is uniformly continuous,
-- `uniform_fun.postcomp_uniform_continuous` tells us that
-- `((/) ∘ —) : (α →ᵤ G × G) → (α →ᵤ G)` is uniformly continuous too. By precomposing with
-- `uniform_fun.uniform_equiv_prod_arrow`, this gives that
-- `(/) : (α →ᵤ G) × (α →ᵤ G) → (α →ᵤ G)` is also uniformly continuous
⟨(uniform_fun.postcomp_uniform_continuous uniform_continuous_div).comp
uniform_fun.uniform_equiv_prod_arrow.symm.uniform_continuous⟩
@[to_additive]
protected lemma uniform_fun.has_basis_nhds_one_of_basis {p : ι → Prop}
{b : ι → set G} (h : (𝓝 1 : filter G).has_basis p b) :
(𝓝 1 : filter (α →ᵤ G)).has_basis p
(λ i, {f : α →ᵤ G | ∀ x, f x ∈ b i}) :=
begin
have := h.comap (λ p : G × G, p.2 / p.1),
rw ← uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one at this,
convert uniform_fun.has_basis_nhds_of_basis α _ 1 this,
ext i f,
simp [uniform_fun.gen]
end
@[to_additive]
protected lemma uniform_fun.has_basis_nhds_one :
(𝓝 1 : filter (α →ᵤ G)).has_basis
(λ V : set G, V ∈ (𝓝 1 : filter G))
(λ V, {f : α → G | ∀ x, f x ∈ V}) :=
uniform_fun.has_basis_nhds_one_of_basis (basis_sets _)
/-- Let `𝔖 : set (set α)`. If `G` is a uniform group, then `α →ᵤ[𝔖] G` is a uniform group as
well. -/
@[to_additive "Let `𝔖 : set (set α)`. If `G` is a uniform additive group, then `α →ᵤ[𝔖] G` is a
uniform additive group as well. "]
instance : uniform_group (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) :=
-- Since `(/) : G × G → G` is uniformly continuous,
-- `uniform_on_fun.postcomp_uniform_continuous` tells us that
-- `((/) ∘ —) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G × G) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)` is uniformly continuous too. By precomposing with
-- `uniform_on_fun.uniform_equiv_prod_arrow`, this gives that
-- `(/) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)` is also uniformly continuous
⟨(uniform_on_fun.postcomp_uniform_continuous uniform_continuous_div).comp
uniform_on_fun.uniform_equiv_prod_arrow.symm.uniform_continuous⟩
@[to_additive]
protected lemma uniform_on_fun.has_basis_nhds_one_of_basis (𝔖 : set $ set α)
(h𝔖₁ : 𝔖.nonempty) (h𝔖₂ : directed_on (⊆) 𝔖) {p : ι → Prop}
{b : ι → set G} (h : (𝓝 1 : filter G).has_basis p b) :
(𝓝 1 : filter (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)).has_basis
(λ Si : set α × ι, Si.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ p Si.2)
(λ Si, {f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] G | ∀ x ∈ Si.1, f x ∈ b Si.2}) :=
begin
have := h.comap (λ p : G × G, p.1 / p.2),
rw ← uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one_swapped at this,
convert uniform_on_fun.has_basis_nhds_of_basis α _ 𝔖 1 h𝔖₁ h𝔖₂ this,
ext i f,
simp [uniform_on_fun.gen]
end
@[to_additive]
protected lemma uniform_on_fun.has_basis_nhds_one (𝔖 : set $ set α)
(h𝔖₁ : 𝔖.nonempty) (h𝔖₂ : directed_on (⊆) 𝔖) :
(𝓝 1 : filter (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)).has_basis
(λ SV : set α × set G, SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ (𝓝 1 : filter G))
(λ SV, {f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] G | ∀ x ∈ SV.1, f x ∈ SV.2}) :=
uniform_on_fun.has_basis_nhds_one_of_basis 𝔖 h𝔖₁ h𝔖₂ (basis_sets _)
end group
section module
variables (𝕜 α E H : Type*) {hom : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group H] [module 𝕜 H]
[add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E] [topological_space H] [uniform_space E] [uniform_add_group E]
[has_continuous_smul 𝕜 E] {𝔖 : set $ set α} [linear_map_class hom 𝕜 H (α →ᵤ[𝔖] E)]
/-- Let `E` be a TVS, `𝔖 : set (set α)` and `H` a submodule of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] E`. If the image of any
`S ∈ 𝔖` by any `u ∈ H` is bounded (in the sense of `bornology.is_vonN_bounded`), then `H`,
equipped with the topology of `𝔖`-convergence, is a TVS.
For convenience, we don't literally ask for `H : submodule (α →ᵤ[𝔖] E)`. Instead, we prove the
result for any vector space `H` equipped with a linear inducing to `α →ᵤ[𝔖] E`, which is often
easier to use. We also state the `submodule` version as
`uniform_on_fun.has_continuous_smul_submodule_of_image_bounded`. -/
lemma uniform_on_fun.has_continuous_smul_induced_of_image_bounded
(h𝔖₁ : 𝔖.nonempty) (h𝔖₂ : directed_on (⊆) 𝔖)
(φ : hom) (hφ : inducing φ)
(h : ∀ u : H, ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜 ((φ u : α → E) '' s)) :
has_continuous_smul 𝕜 H :=
begin
haveI : topological_add_group H,
{ rw hφ.induced,
exact topological_add_group_induced φ },
have : (𝓝 0 : filter H).has_basis _ _,
{ rw [hφ.induced, nhds_induced, map_zero],
exact ((uniform_on_fun.has_basis_nhds_zero 𝔖 h𝔖₁ h𝔖₂).comap φ) },
refine has_continuous_smul.of_basis_zero this _ _ _,
{ rintros ⟨S, V⟩ ⟨hS, hV⟩,
have : tendsto (λ kx : (𝕜 × E), kx.1 • kx.2) (𝓝 (0, 0)) (𝓝 $ (0 : 𝕜) • 0) :=
continuous_smul.tendsto (0 : 𝕜 × E),
rw [zero_smul, nhds_prod_eq] at this,
have := this hV,
rw [mem_map, mem_prod_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨U, hU, W, hW, hUW⟩,
refine ⟨U, hU, ⟨S, W⟩, ⟨hS, hW⟩, _⟩,
rw set.smul_subset_iff,
intros a ha u hu x hx,
rw smul_hom_class.map_smul,
exact hUW (⟨ha, hu x hx⟩ : (a, φ u x) ∈ U ×ˢ W) },
{ rintros a ⟨S, V⟩ ⟨hS, hV⟩,
have : tendsto (λ x : E, a • x) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 $ a • 0) := tendsto_id.const_smul a,
rw [smul_zero] at this,
refine ⟨⟨S, ((•) a) ⁻¹' V⟩, ⟨hS, this hV⟩, λ f hf x hx, _⟩,
rw [smul_hom_class.map_smul],
exact hf x hx },
{ rintros u ⟨S, V⟩ ⟨hS, hV⟩,
rcases h u S hS hV with ⟨r, hrpos, hr⟩,
rw metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball,
refine ⟨r⁻¹, inv_pos.mpr hrpos, λ a ha x hx, _⟩,
by_cases ha0 : a = 0,
{ rw ha0,
simp [mem_of_mem_nhds hV] },
{ rw mem_ball_zero_iff at ha,
rw [smul_hom_class.map_smul, pi.smul_apply],
have : φ u x ∈ a⁻¹ • V,
{ have ha0 : 0<‖a‖ := norm_pos_iff.mpr ha0,
refine (hr a⁻¹ _) (set.mem_image_of_mem (φ u) hx),
rw [norm_inv, le_inv hrpos ha0],
exact ha.le },
rwa set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ ha0 at this } }
end
/-- Let `E` be a TVS, `𝔖 : set (set α)` and `H` a submodule of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] E`. If the image of any
`S ∈ 𝔖` by any `u ∈ H` is bounded (in the sense of `bornology.is_vonN_bounded`), then `H`,
equipped with the topology of `𝔖`-convergence, is a TVS.
If you have a hard time using this lemma, try the one above instead. -/
lemma uniform_on_fun.has_continuous_smul_submodule_of_image_bounded
(h𝔖₁ : 𝔖.nonempty) (h𝔖₂ : directed_on (⊆) 𝔖) (H : submodule 𝕜 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] E))
(h : ∀ u ∈ H, ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, bornology.is_vonN_bounded 𝕜 (u '' s)) :
@has_continuous_smul 𝕜 H _ _
((uniform_on_fun.topological_space α E 𝔖).induced (coe : H → α →ᵤ[𝔖] E)) :=
begin
haveI : topological_add_group H := topological_add_group_induced
(linear_map.id.dom_restrict H : H →ₗ[𝕜] α → E),
exact uniform_on_fun.has_continuous_smul_induced_of_image_bounded 𝕜 α E H h𝔖₁ h𝔖₂
(linear_map.id.dom_restrict H : H →ₗ[𝕜] α → E) inducing_coe (λ ⟨u, hu⟩, h u hu)
end
end module
|
6ab30ff85f53d6af7449484f816b475848a0cd80 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Util/PPExt.lean | 730bf5c55fdfcf890fb2ade33111fcf7c2e850dc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,321 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Environment
import Init.Lean.MetavarContext
namespace Lean
abbrev PPExprFn := Environment → MetavarContext → LocalContext → Options → Expr → Format
/- TODO: delete after we implement the new pretty printer in Lean -/
@[extern "lean_pp_expr"]
constant ppOld : Environment → MetavarContext → LocalContext → Options → Expr → Format := arbitrary _
def mkPPExprFnRef : IO (IO.Ref PPExprFn) := IO.mkRef ppOld
@[init mkPPExprFnRef] def PPExprFnRef : IO.Ref PPExprFn := arbitrary _
def mkPPExprFnExtension : IO (EnvExtension PPExprFn) :=
registerEnvExtension $ PPExprFnRef.get
@[init mkPPExprFnExtension]
constant ppExprExt : EnvExtension PPExprFn := arbitrary _
def ppExpr (env : Environment) (mctx : MetavarContext) (lctx : LocalContext) (opts : Options) (e : Expr) : Format :=
let e := (mctx.instantiateMVars e).1;
if opts.getBool `ppOld true then
(ppExprExt.getState env) env mctx lctx opts e
else
format (toString e)
-- TODO: remove after we remove ppOld
@[init] def ppOldOption : IO Unit :=
registerOption `ppOld { defValue := true, group := "", descr := "disable/enable old pretty printer" }
end Lean
|
f5b1c6aa60ed4db7cdbaab329baf81fcb6bc504f | 37a833c924892ee3ecb911484775a6d6ebb8984d | /src/category_theory/enriched.lean | bdeb52be966eae02fd182a0c14a32d96a38fa20c | [] | no_license | silky/lean-category-theory | 28126e80564a1f99e9c322d86b3f7d750da0afa1 | 0f029a2364975f56ac727d31d867a18c95c22fd8 | refs/heads/master | 1,589,555,811,646 | 1,554,673,665,000 | 1,554,673,665,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,219 | lean | import category_theory.limits
import category_theory.limits.preserves
import category_theory.limits.types
import category_theory.fully_faithful
open category_theory.limits
universes u v
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u} [𝒞 : category.{u v} C]
variables (V : Type (v+1)) [𝒱 : large_category V]
[has_terminal.{v+1 v} V] [has_binary_products.{v+1 v} V]
(ℱ : V ⥤ Type v) [faithful ℱ] [preserves_limits ℱ]
include 𝒞 𝒱
class enriched_over :=
(enriched_hom : C → C → V)
(enriched_id : Π {X : C}, terminal V ⟶ enriched_hom X X)
(enriched_comp : Π {X Y Z : C}, limits.prod (enriched_hom X Y) (enriched_hom Y Z) ⟶ enriched_hom X Z)
(fibre_hom : Π {X Y : C}, ℱ.obj (enriched_hom X Y) ≅ (X ⟶ Y))
/- to state compatibility between enriched_comp and comp, we need that the fibre functor preserves limits -/
-- TODO simple examples
/- The category of types is enriched over itself. -/
-- instance : enriched_over.{u v} (Type v) (functor.id _) :=
-- { enriched_hom := λ X Y, X ⟶ Y,
-- enriched_id := λ (X : C) _, 𝟙 X,
-- enriched_comp := λ X Y Z, begin dsimp, exact λ p, p.1 ≫ p.2, end,
-- fibre_hom := by obviously }
end category_theory |
0b205e23443fd7330575e4aabfdd4d1ad1aede4a | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/splitIssue.lean | dcae8155e5ba0ca24db2e648df0356977136e775 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,515 | lean | inductive ListSplit {α : Type u} : List α → Type u
| split l₁ l₂ : ListSplit (l₁ ++ l₂)
def splitList {α : Type _} : (l : List α) → ListSplit l
| [] => ListSplit.split [] []
| h :: t => ListSplit.split [h] t
theorem Nat.lt_add_left {m n : Nat} : m < n + m := sorry
theorem Nat.lt_add_right {m n : Nat} : m < m + n := sorry
def len : List α → Nat
| [] => 0
| a :: [] => 1
| l =>
match splitList l with
| ListSplit.split fst snd => len fst + len snd
termination_by _ l => l.length
decreasing_by
simp [measure, id, invImage, InvImage, Nat.lt_wfRel, WellFoundedRelation.rel, sizeOf] <;>
first
| apply Nat.lt_add_right
| apply Nat.lt_add_left
theorem len_nil : len ([] : List α) = 0 := by
simp [len]
-- The `simp [len]` above generated the following equation theorems for len
#check @len._eq_1
#check @len._eq_2
#check @len._eq_3 -- It is conditional, and may be tricky to use.
theorem len_1 (a : α) : len [a] = 1 := by
simp [len]
theorem len_2 (a b : α) (bs : List α) : len (a::b::bs) = 1 + len (b::bs) := by
conv => lhs; unfold len
-- The `unfold` tactic above generated the following theorem
#check @len._unfold
theorem len_cons (a : α) (as : List α) : len (a::as) = 1 + len as := by
cases as with
| nil => simp [len_1, len_nil]
| cons b bs => simp [len_2]
theorem listlen : ∀ l : List α, l.length = len l := by
intro l
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons h t ih =>
simp [List.length, len_cons, ih]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
|
3ba3d31990d1c90e4e016aa491bb9f61f343c7e3 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /roadmap/topology/shrinking_lemma.lean | 83a1d87d70aeab1e5aa688ee8ccc84d9ab32d9be | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,839 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton
-/
import ..todo
import topology.separation
/-!
A formal roadmap for the shrinking lemma for local finite countable covers.
It contains the statement of the lemma, and an informal sketch of the proof,
along with references.
Any contributor should feel welcome to contribute a formal proof. When this happens,
we should also consider preserving the current file as an exemplar of a formal roadmap.
-/
open set
universes u v
/-- A point-finite open cover of a closed subset of a normal space can be "shrunk" to a new open
cover so that the closure of each new open set is contained in the corresponding original open
set. -/
lemma shrinking_lemma {X : Type u} [topological_space X] [normal_space X]
{s : set X} (hs : is_closed s) {α : Type v} (u : α → set X) (uo : ∀ a, is_open (u a))
(uf : ∀ x, finite {a | x ∈ u a}) (su : s ⊆ Union u) :
∃ v : α → set X, s ⊆ Union v ∧ ∀ a, is_open (v a) ∧ closure (v a) ⊆ u a :=
todo
/-
Apply Zorn's lemma to
T = Σ (i : set α), {v : α → set X // s ⊆ Union v ∧ (∀ a, is_open (v a)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ i, closure (v a) ⊆ u a) ∧ (∀ a ∉ i, v a = u a)}
with the ordering
⟨i, v, _⟩ ≤ ⟨i', v', _⟩ ↔ i ⊆ i' ∧ ∀ a ∈ i, v a = v' a
The hypothesis that `X` is normal implies that a maximal element must have `i = univ`.
Point-finiteness of `u` (hypothesis `uf`) implies that
the least upper bound of a chain in `T` again yields a covering of `s`.
Compare proofs in
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/shrinking+lemma#ShrinkingLemmaForLocallyFiniteCountableCovers
* Bourbaki, General Topology, Chapter IX, §4.3
* Dugundji, Topology, Chapter VII, Theorem 6.1
-/
|
074225317bc50e33652ca264d92f9d298184cb7b | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/doNotation1.lean | 07a8e8a3788cc23c8517a38ace9be3b313e85f5e | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,844 | lean | --
def f1 (x : Nat) : IO Nat := do
y := 1 -- error 'y' cannot be reassigned
def f2 (xs : List (Nat × Nat)) : List (Nat × Nat) := Id.run <| do
for (x, y) in xs do
(y, x) := (x, y) -- error 'y' (and 'x') cannot be reassigned
def f3 (xs : List (Nat × Nat)) : List (Nat × Nat) := Id.run <| do
for p in xs do
p := (p.2, p.1) -- works. `forInMap` requires a variable
inductive Vector (α : Type) : Nat → Type
| nil : Vector α 0
| cons : α → {n : Nat} → Vector α n → Vector α (n+1)
def f4 (b : Bool) (n : Nat) (v : Vector Nat n) : Vector Nat (n+1) := Id.run <| do
let mut v := v
if b then
v := Vector.cons 1 v
Vector.cons 1 v
def f5 (y : Nat) (xs : List Nat) : List Bool := Id.run <| do
let mut y := y
for x in xs do
y := true -- invalid reassigned
def f6 (xs : List Nat) : IO (List Nat) := do
for x in xs do -- type error
IO.println x
def f7 (xs : List Nat) : IO Unit := do
unless xs.isEmpty do
break -- error must be inside 'for'
def f8 (xs : List Nat) : IO Unit := do
unless xs.isEmpty do
continue -- error must be inside 'for'
def f9 (xs : List Nat) : IO Unit := do
return xs -- error, must be last element in the sequence
return xs
def f10 (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
IO.println x
#print f10 -- we do not generate an unnecessary bind
def f11 (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
if x > 0 then
IO.println "x is not zero"
IO.mkRef true -- error here as expected
def f12 (x : Nat) : IO Unit := do
let mut x := x
if x > 0 then
pure true
else
x := x + 1
IO.println "hello" -- error here the other branch returns `Bool`
IO.println x
def f13 (xs : List Nat) : IO Bool := do
if xs == [] then
return true
else
return false
IO.println "hello" -- error unreachable
def f14 (x : Nat) : IO Nat := do
let y ← if x == 0 then return 100 else return 200
IO.println ("y: " ++ toString y) -- error unreachable
return 0
|
db6a039e9233401b7d9c70af78afb67fd8331447 | 0845ae2ca02071debcfd4ac24be871236c01784f | /library/init/lean/attributes.lean | c39c82bbad814df3fdf848d2ef180f4fcd520b27 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean4 | 74c267eb0e900bfaa23df8de86039483ecbd60b7 | 228ddd5fdcd98dd4e9c009f425284e86917938aa | refs/heads/master | 1,643,131,356,301 | 1,562,715,572,000 | 1,562,715,572,000 | 192,390,898 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,560,792,750,000 | 1,560,792,749,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,563 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.lean.environment init.lean.syntax
namespace Lean
/- Scope management -/
structure ScopeManagerState :=
(allNamespaces : NameSet := {})
/- Stack of namespaces for each each open namespace and section -/
(namespaces : List Name := [])
/- Stack of namespace/section headers -/
(headers : List Name := [])
(isNamespace : List Bool := [])
namespace ScopeManagerState
instance : Inhabited ScopeManagerState := ⟨{}⟩
def saveNamespace (s : ScopeManagerState) (n : Name) : ScopeManagerState :=
{ allNamespaces := s.allNamespaces.insert n, .. s }
end ScopeManagerState
def regScopeManagerExtension : IO (SimplePersistentEnvExtension Name ScopeManagerState) :=
registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
name := `scopes,
addImportedFn := fun as => mkStateFromImportedEntries ScopeManagerState.saveNamespace {} as,
addEntryFn := fun s n => { allNamespaces := s.allNamespaces.insert n, .. s },
}
@[init regScopeManagerExtension]
constant scopeManagerExt : SimplePersistentEnvExtension Name ScopeManagerState := default _
namespace Environment
@[export lean.get_namespaces_core]
def getNamespaces (env : Environment) : List Name :=
(scopeManagerExt.getState env).namespaces
def getNamespaceSet (env : Environment) : NameSet :=
(scopeManagerExt.getState env).allNamespaces
@[export lean.is_namespace_core]
def isNamespace (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Bool :=
env.getNamespaceSet.contains n
@[export lean.in_section_core]
def inSection (env : Environment) : Bool :=
match (scopeManagerExt.getState env).isNamespace with
| (b::_) => !b
| _ => false
@[export lean.has_open_scopes_core]
def hasOpenScopes (env : Environment) : Bool :=
!env.getNamespaces.isEmpty
@[export lean.get_namespace_core]
def getNamespace (env : Environment) : Name :=
match env.getNamespaces with
| (n::_) => n
| _ => Name.anonymous
@[export lean.get_scope_header_core]
def getScopeHeader (env : Environment) : Name :=
match (scopeManagerExt.getState env).headers with
| (n::_) => n
| _ => Name.anonymous
@[export lean.to_valid_namespace_core]
def toValidNamespace (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Option Name :=
let s := scopeManagerExt.getState env;
if s.allNamespaces.contains n then some n
else s.namespaces.foldl
(fun r ns => match r with
| some _ => r
| none =>
let c := ns ++ n;
if s.allNamespaces.contains c then some c else none)
none
def registerNamespaceAux (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Environment :=
if env.getNamespaceSet.contains n then env else scopeManagerExt.addEntry env n
@[export lean.register_namespace_core]
def registerNamespace : Environment → Name → Environment
| env n@(Name.mkString p _) := registerNamespace (registerNamespaceAux env n) p
| env _ := env
def pushScopeCore (env : Environment) (header : Name) (isNamespace : Bool) : Environment :=
let ns := env.getNamespace;
let newNs := if isNamespace then ns ++ header else ns;
let env := env.registerNamespaceAux newNs;
let env := scopeManagerExt.modifyState env $ fun s =>
{ headers := header :: s.headers,
namespaces := newNs :: s.namespaces,
isNamespace := isNamespace :: s.isNamespace,
.. s };
env
def popScopeCore (env : Environment) : Environment :=
if env.getNamespaces.isEmpty then env
else scopeManagerExt.modifyState env $ fun s =>
{ headers := s.headers.tail,
namespaces := s.namespaces.tail,
isNamespace := s.isNamespace.tail,
.. s }
end Environment
inductive AttributeApplicationTime
| afterTypeChecking | afterCompilation
structure AttributeImpl :=
(name : Name)
(descr : String)
(add (env : Environment) (decl : Name) (args : Syntax) (persistent : Bool) : IO Environment)
(addScoped (env : Environment) (decl : Name) (args : Syntax) : IO Environment
:= throw (IO.userError ("attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "' does not support scopes")))
(erase (env : Environment) (decl : Name) (persistent : Bool) : IO Environment
:= throw (IO.userError ("attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "' does not support removal")))
(activateScoped (env : Environment) (scope : Name) : IO Environment := pure env)
(pushScope (env : Environment) : IO Environment := pure env)
(popScope (env : Environment) : IO Environment := pure env)
(applicationTime := AttributeApplicationTime.afterTypeChecking)
instance AttributeImpl.inhabited : Inhabited AttributeImpl :=
⟨{ name := default _, descr := default _, add := fun env _ _ _ => pure env }⟩
def mkAttributeMapRef : IO (IO.Ref (HashMap Name AttributeImpl)) :=
IO.mkRef {}
@[init mkAttributeMapRef]
constant attributeMapRef : IO.Ref (HashMap Name AttributeImpl) := default _
def mkAttributeArrayRef : IO (IO.Ref (Array AttributeImpl)) :=
IO.mkRef Array.empty
@[init mkAttributeArrayRef]
constant attributeArrayRef : IO.Ref (Array AttributeImpl) := default _
/- Low level attribute registration function. -/
def registerAttribute (attr : AttributeImpl) : IO Unit :=
do m ← attributeMapRef.get;
when (m.contains attr.name) $ throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute declaration, '" ++ toString attr.name ++ "' has already been used"));
initializing ← IO.initializing;
unless initializing $ throw (IO.userError ("failed to register attribute, attributes can only be registered during initialization"));
attributeMapRef.modify (fun m => m.insert attr.name attr);
attributeArrayRef.modify (fun attrs => attrs.push attr)
/- Return true iff `n` is the name of a registered attribute. -/
@[export lean.is_attribute_core]
def isAttribute (n : Name) : IO Bool :=
do m ← attributeMapRef.get; pure (m.contains n)
/- Return the name of all registered attributes. -/
def getAttributeNames : IO (List Name) :=
do m ← attributeMapRef.get; pure $ m.fold (fun r n _ => n::r) []
def getAttributeImpl (attrName : Name) : IO AttributeImpl :=
do m ← attributeMapRef.get;
match m.find attrName with
| some attr => pure attr
| none => throw (IO.userError ("unknown attribute '" ++ toString attrName ++ "'"))
@[export lean.attribute_application_time_core]
def attributeApplicationTime (n : Name) : IO AttributeApplicationTime :=
do attr ← getAttributeImpl n;
pure attr.applicationTime
namespace Environment
/- Add attribute `attr` to declaration `decl` with arguments `args`. If `persistent == true`, then attribute is saved on .olean file.
It throws an error when
- `attr` is not the name of an attribute registered in the system.
- `attr` does not support `persistent == false`.
- `args` is not valid for `attr`. -/
@[export lean.add_attribute_core]
def addAttribute (env : Environment) (decl : Name) (attrName : Name) (args : Syntax := Syntax.missing) (persistent := true) : IO Environment :=
do attr ← getAttributeImpl attrName;
attr.add env decl args persistent
/- Add a scoped attribute `attr` to declaration `decl` with arguments `args` and scope `decl.getPrefix`.
Scoped attributes are always persistent.
It returns `Except.error` when
- `attr` is not the name of an attribute registered in the system.
- `attr` does not support scoped attributes.
- `args` is not valid for `attr`.
Remark: the attribute will not be activated if `decl` is not inside the current namespace `env.getNamespace`. -/
@[export lean.add_scoped_attribute_core]
def addScopedAttribute (env : Environment) (decl : Name) (attrName : Name) (args : Syntax := Syntax.missing) : IO Environment :=
do attr ← getAttributeImpl attrName;
attr.addScoped env decl args
/- Remove attribute `attr` from declaration `decl`. The effect is the current scope.
It returns `Except.error` when
- `attr` is not the name of an attribute registered in the system.
- `attr` does not support erasure.
- `args` is not valid for `attr`. -/
@[export lean.erase_attribute_core]
def eraseAttribute (env : Environment) (decl : Name) (attrName : Name) (persistent := true) : IO Environment :=
do attr ← getAttributeImpl attrName;
attr.erase env decl persistent
/- Activate the scoped attribute `attr` for all declarations in scope `scope`.
We use this function to implement the command `open foo`. -/
@[export lean.activate_scoped_attribute_core]
def activateScopedAttribute (env : Environment) (attrName : Name) (scope : Name) : IO Environment :=
do attr ← getAttributeImpl attrName;
attr.activateScoped env scope
/- Activate all scoped attributes at `scope` -/
@[export lean.activate_scoped_attributes_core]
def activateScopedAttributes (env : Environment) (scope : Name) : IO Environment :=
do attrs ← attributeArrayRef.get;
attrs.mfoldl (fun env attr => attr.activateScoped env scope) env
/- We use this function to implement commands `namespace foo` and `section foo`.
It activates scoped attributes in the new resulting namespace. -/
@[export lean.push_scope_core]
def pushScope (env : Environment) (header : Name) (isNamespace : Bool) : IO Environment :=
do let env := env.pushScopeCore header isNamespace;
let ns := env.getNamespace;
attrs ← attributeArrayRef.get;
attrs.mfoldl (fun env attr => do env ← attr.pushScope env; if isNamespace then attr.activateScoped env ns else pure env) env
/- We use this function to implement commands `end foo` for closing namespaces and sections. -/
@[export lean.pop_scope_core]
def popScope (env : Environment) : IO Environment :=
do let env := env.popScopeCore;
attrs ← attributeArrayRef.get;
attrs.mfoldl (fun env attr => attr.popScope env) env
end Environment
/--
Tag attributes are simple and efficient. They are useful for marking declarations in the modules where
they were defined.
The startup cost for this kind of attribute is very small since `addImportedFn` is a constant function.
They provide the predicate `tagAttr.hasTag env decl` which returns true iff declaration `decl`
is tagged in the environment `env`. -/
structure TagAttribute :=
(attr : AttributeImpl)
(ext : PersistentEnvExtension Name NameSet)
def registerTagAttribute (name : Name) (descr : String) (validate : Environment → Name → Except String Unit := fun _ _ => Except.ok ()) : IO TagAttribute :=
do
ext : PersistentEnvExtension Name NameSet ← registerPersistentEnvExtension {
name := name,
addImportedFn := fun _ => {},
addEntryFn := fun (s : NameSet) n => s.insert n,
exportEntriesFn := fun es =>
let r : Array Name := es.fold (fun a e => a.push e) Array.empty;
r.qsort Name.quickLt,
statsFn := fun s => "tag attribute" ++ Format.line ++ "number of local entries: " ++ format s.size
};
let attrImpl : AttributeImpl := {
name := name,
descr := descr,
add := fun env decl args persistent => do
unless args.isMissing $ throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', unexpected argument"));
unless persistent $ throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', must be persistent"));
unless (env.getModuleIdxFor decl).isNone $
throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', declaration is in an imported module"));
match validate env decl with
| Except.error msg => throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', " ++ msg))
| _ => pure $ ext.addEntry env decl
};
registerAttribute attrImpl;
pure { attr := attrImpl, ext := ext }
namespace TagAttribute
instance : Inhabited TagAttribute := ⟨{attr := default _, ext := default _}⟩
def hasTag (attr : TagAttribute) (env : Environment) (decl : Name) : Bool :=
match env.getModuleIdxFor decl with
| some modIdx => (attr.ext.getModuleEntries env modIdx).binSearchContains decl Name.quickLt
| none => (attr.ext.getState env).contains decl
end TagAttribute
/--
A `TagAttribute` variant where we can attach parameters to attributes.
It is slightly more expensive and consumes a little bit more memory than `TagAttribute`.
They provide the function `pAttr.getParam env decl` which returns `some p` iff declaration `decl`
contains the attribute `pAttr` with parameter `p`. -/
structure ParametricAttribute (α : Type) :=
(attr : AttributeImpl)
(ext : PersistentEnvExtension (Name × α) (NameMap α))
def registerParametricAttribute {α : Type} [Inhabited α] (name : Name) (descr : String)
(getParam : Environment → Name → Syntax → Except String α)
(afterSet : Environment → Name → α → Except String Environment := fun env _ _ => Except.ok env) : IO (ParametricAttribute α) :=
do
ext : PersistentEnvExtension (Name × α) (NameMap α) ← registerPersistentEnvExtension {
name := name,
addImportedFn := fun _ => {},
addEntryFn := fun (s : NameMap α) (p : Name × α) => s.insert p.1 p.2,
exportEntriesFn := fun m =>
let r : Array (Name × α) := m.fold (fun a n p => a.push (n, p)) Array.empty;
r.qsort (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1),
statsFn := fun s => "parametric attribute" ++ Format.line ++ "number of local entries: " ++ format s.size
};
let attrImpl : AttributeImpl := {
name := name,
descr := descr,
add := fun env decl args persistent => do
unless persistent $ throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', must be persistent"));
unless (env.getModuleIdxFor decl).isNone $
throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', declaration is in an imported module"));
match getParam env decl args with
| Except.error msg => throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', " ++ msg))
| Except.ok val => do
let env := ext.addEntry env (decl, val);
match afterSet env decl val with
| Except.error msg => throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', " ++ msg))
| Except.ok env => pure env
};
registerAttribute attrImpl;
pure { attr := attrImpl, ext := ext }
namespace ParametricAttribute
instance {α : Type} : Inhabited (ParametricAttribute α) := ⟨{attr := default _, ext := default _}⟩
def getParam {α : Type} [Inhabited α] (attr : ParametricAttribute α) (env : Environment) (decl : Name) : Option α :=
match env.getModuleIdxFor decl with
| some modIdx =>
match (attr.ext.getModuleEntries env modIdx).binSearch (decl, default _) (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1) with
| some (_, val) => some val
| none => none
| none => (attr.ext.getState env).find decl
def setParam {α : Type} (attr : ParametricAttribute α) (env : Environment) (decl : Name) (param : α) : Except String Environment :=
if (env.getModuleIdxFor decl).isSome then
Except.error ("invalid '" ++ toString attr.attr.name ++ "'.setParam, declaration is in an imported module")
else if ((attr.ext.getState env).find decl).isSome then
Except.error ("invalid '" ++ toString attr.attr.name ++ "'.setParam, attribute has already been set")
else
Except.ok (attr.ext.addEntry env (decl, param))
end ParametricAttribute
/-
Given a list `[a₁, ..., a_n]` of elements of type `α`, `EnumAttributes` provides an attribute `Attr_i` for
associating a value `a_i` with an declaration. `α` is usually an enumeration type.
Note that whenever we register an `EnumAttributes`, we create `n` attributes, but only one environment extension. -/
structure EnumAttributes (α : Type) :=
(attrs : List AttributeImpl)
(ext : PersistentEnvExtension (Name × α) (NameMap α))
def registerEnumAttributes {α : Type} [Inhabited α] (extName : Name) (attrDescrs : List (Name × String × α)) (validate : Environment → Name → α → Except String Unit := fun _ _ _ => Except.ok ()) : IO (EnumAttributes α) :=
do
ext : PersistentEnvExtension (Name × α) (NameMap α) ← registerPersistentEnvExtension {
name := extName,
addImportedFn := fun _ => {},
addEntryFn := fun (s : NameMap α) (p : Name × α) => s.insert p.1 p.2,
exportEntriesFn := fun m =>
let r : Array (Name × α) := m.fold (fun a n p => a.push (n, p)) Array.empty;
r.qsort (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1),
statsFn := fun s => "enumeration attribute extension" ++ Format.line ++ "number of local entries: " ++ format s.size
};
let attrs := attrDescrs.map $ fun ⟨name, descr, val⟩ => { AttributeImpl .
name := name,
descr := descr,
add := fun env decl args persistent => do
unless persistent $ throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', must be persistent"));
unless (env.getModuleIdxFor decl).isNone $
throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', declaration is in an imported module"));
match validate env decl val with
| Except.error msg => throw (IO.userError ("invalid attribute '" ++ toString name ++ "', " ++ msg))
| _ => pure $ ext.addEntry env (decl, val)
};
attrs.mfor registerAttribute;
pure { ext := ext, attrs := attrs }
namespace EnumAttributes
instance {α : Type} : Inhabited (EnumAttributes α) := ⟨{attrs := [], ext := default _}⟩
def getValue {α : Type} [Inhabited α] (attr : EnumAttributes α) (env : Environment) (decl : Name) : Option α :=
match env.getModuleIdxFor decl with
| some modIdx =>
match (attr.ext.getModuleEntries env modIdx).binSearch (decl, default _) (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1) with
| some (_, val) => some val
| none => none
| none => (attr.ext.getState env).find decl
def setValue {α : Type} (attrs : EnumAttributes α) (env : Environment) (decl : Name) (val : α) : Except String Environment :=
if (env.getModuleIdxFor decl).isSome then
Except.error ("invalid '" ++ toString attrs.ext.name ++ "'.setValue, declaration is in an imported module")
else if ((attrs.ext.getState env).find decl).isSome then
Except.error ("invalid '" ++ toString attrs.ext.name ++ "'.setValue, attribute has already been set")
else
Except.ok (attrs.ext.addEntry env (decl, val))
end EnumAttributes
/- Helper function for converting a Syntax object representing attribute parameters into an identifier.
It returns `none` if the parameter is not a simple identifier.
Remark: in the future, attributes should define their own parsers, and we should use `match_syntax` to
decode the Syntax object. -/
def attrParamSyntaxToIdentifier (s : Syntax) : Option Name :=
match s with
| Syntax.node k args _ =>
if k == nullKind && args.size == 1 then match args.get 0 with
| Syntax.ident _ _ id _ _ => some id
| _ => none
else
none
| _ => none
end Lean
|
13dbb276cfeb1065b0455c09ced629905cc6afde | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/geometry/manifold/algebra/lie_group.lean | b74e74fcb88c19dd56d0272a0e45de005739f6a4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,098 | lean | /-
Copyright © 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri
-/
import geometry.manifold.algebra.monoid
/-!
# Lie groups
A Lie group is a group that is also a smooth manifold, in which the group operations of
multiplication and inversion are smooth maps. Smoothness of the group multiplication means that
multiplication is a smooth mapping of the product manifold `G` × `G` into `G`.
Note that, since a manifold here is not second-countable and Hausdorff a Lie group here is not
guaranteed to be second-countable (even though it can be proved it is Hausdorff). Note also that Lie
groups here are not necessarily finite dimensional.
## Main definitions and statements
* `lie_add_group I G` : a Lie additive group where `G` is a manifold on the model with corners `I`.
* `lie_group I G` : a Lie multiplicative group where `G` is a manifold on the model with
corners `I`.
* `normed_space_lie_add_group` : a normed vector space over a nondiscrete normed field
is an additive Lie group.
## Implementation notes
A priori, a Lie group here is a manifold with corners.
The definition of Lie group cannot require `I : model_with_corners 𝕜 E E` with the same space as the
model space and as the model vector space, as one might hope, beause in the product situation,
the model space is `model_prod E E'` and the model vector space is `E × E'`, which are not the same,
so the definition does not apply. Hence the definition should be more general, allowing
`I : model_with_corners 𝕜 E H`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale manifold
section
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A Lie (additive) group is a group and a smooth manifold at the same time in which
the addition and negation operations are smooth. -/
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
@[ancestor has_smooth_add]
class lie_add_group {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{H : Type*} [topological_space H]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] (I : model_with_corners 𝕜 E H)
(G : Type*) [add_group G] [topological_space G] [charted_space H G]
extends has_smooth_add I G : Prop :=
(smooth_neg : smooth I I (λ a:G, -a))
/-- A Lie group is a group and a smooth manifold at the same time in which
the multiplication and inverse operations are smooth. -/
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
@[ancestor has_smooth_mul, to_additive]
class lie_group {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{H : Type*} [topological_space H]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] (I : model_with_corners 𝕜 E H)
(G : Type*) [group G] [topological_space G] [charted_space H G]
extends has_smooth_mul I G : Prop :=
(smooth_inv : smooth I I (λ a:G, a⁻¹))
end
section lie_group
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{H : Type*} [topological_space H]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] {I : model_with_corners 𝕜 E H}
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F] {J : model_with_corners 𝕜 F F}
{G : Type*} [topological_space G] [charted_space H G] [group G] [lie_group I G]
{E' : Type*} [normed_group E'] [normed_space 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [topological_space H'] {I' : model_with_corners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [charted_space H' M]
{E'' : Type*} [normed_group E''] [normed_space 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [topological_space H''] {I'' : model_with_corners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M' : Type*} [topological_space M'] [charted_space H'' M']
section
variable (I)
@[to_additive]
lemma smooth_inv : smooth I I (λ x : G, x⁻¹) :=
lie_group.smooth_inv
/-- A Lie group is a topological group. This is not an instance for technical reasons,
see note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive Lie group is an additive topological group. This is not an instance for technical
reasons, see note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]."]
lemma topological_group_of_lie_group : topological_group G :=
{ continuous_inv := (smooth_inv I).continuous,
.. has_continuous_mul_of_smooth I }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma smooth.inv {f : M → G}
(hf : smooth I' I f) : smooth I' I (λx, (f x)⁻¹) :=
(smooth_inv I).comp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma smooth_on.inv {f : M → G} {s : set M}
(hf : smooth_on I' I f s) : smooth_on I' I (λx, (f x)⁻¹) s :=
(smooth_inv I).comp_smooth_on hf
@[to_additive]
lemma smooth.div {f g : M → G}
(hf : smooth I' I f) (hg : smooth I' I g) : smooth I' I (f / g) :=
by { rw div_eq_mul_inv, exact ((smooth_mul I).comp (hf.prod_mk hg.inv) : _), }
@[to_additive]
lemma smooth_on.div {f g : M → G} {s : set M}
(hf : smooth_on I' I f s) (hg : smooth_on I' I g s) : smooth_on I' I (f / g) s :=
by { rw div_eq_mul_inv, exact ((smooth_mul I).comp_smooth_on (hf.prod_mk hg.inv) : _), }
end lie_group
section prod_lie_group
/- Instance of product group -/
@[to_additive]
instance {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] {H : Type*} [topological_space H]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] {I : model_with_corners 𝕜 E H}
{G : Type*} [topological_space G] [charted_space H G] [group G] [lie_group I G]
{E' : Type*} [normed_group E'] [normed_space 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [topological_space H'] {I' : model_with_corners 𝕜 E' H'}
{G' : Type*} [topological_space G'] [charted_space H' G']
[group G'] [lie_group I' G'] :
lie_group (I.prod I') (G×G') :=
{ smooth_inv := smooth_fst.inv.prod_mk smooth_snd.inv,
..has_smooth_mul.prod _ _ _ _ }
end prod_lie_group
/-! ### Normed spaces are Lie groups -/
instance normed_space_lie_add_group {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] :
lie_add_group (𝓘(𝕜, E)) E :=
{ smooth_add := smooth_iff.2 ⟨continuous_add, λ x y, times_cont_diff_add.times_cont_diff_on⟩,
smooth_neg := smooth_iff.2 ⟨continuous_neg, λ x y, times_cont_diff_neg.times_cont_diff_on⟩,
.. model_space_smooth }
|
23b8a400ac00f5453898ec4453aa714846ed3a2f | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/topology/algebra/order/monotone_convergence.lean | aae01923dbf9f70d22c865f1844fb79ca62673c0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,863 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.order.basic
/-!
# Bounded monotone sequences converge
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we prove a few theorems of the form “if the range of a monotone function `f : ι → α`
admits a least upper bound `a`, then `f x` tends to `a` as `x → ∞`”, as well as version of this
statement for (conditionally) complete lattices that use `⨆ x, f x` instead of `is_lub`.
These theorems work for linear orders with order topologies as well as their products (both in terms
of `prod` and in terms of function types). In order to reduce code duplication, we introduce two
typeclasses (one for the property formulated above and one for the dual property), prove theorems
assuming one of these typeclasses, and provide instances for linear orders and their products.
We also prove some "inverse" results: if `f n` is a monotone sequence and `a` is its limit,
then `f n ≤ a` for all `n`.
## Tags
monotone convergence
-/
open filter set function
open_locale filter topology classical
variables {α β : Type*}
/-- We say that `α` is a `Sup_convergence_class` if the following holds. Let `f : ι → α` be a
monotone function, let `a : α` be a least upper bound of `set.range f`. Then `f x` tends to `𝓝 a` as
`x → ∞` (formally, at the filter `filter.at_top`). We require this for `ι = (s : set α)`, `f = coe`
in the definition, then prove it for any `f` in `tendsto_at_top_is_lub`.
This property holds for linear orders with order topology as well as their products. -/
class Sup_convergence_class (α : Type*) [preorder α] [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(tendsto_coe_at_top_is_lub : ∀ (a : α) (s : set α), is_lub s a → tendsto (coe : s → α) at_top (𝓝 a))
/-- We say that `α` is an `Inf_convergence_class` if the following holds. Let `f : ι → α` be a
monotone function, let `a : α` be a greatest lower bound of `set.range f`. Then `f x` tends to `𝓝 a`
as `x → -∞` (formally, at the filter `filter.at_bot`). We require this for `ι = (s : set α)`,
`f = coe` in the definition, then prove it for any `f` in `tendsto_at_bot_is_glb`.
This property holds for linear orders with order topology as well as their products. -/
class Inf_convergence_class (α : Type*) [preorder α] [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(tendsto_coe_at_bot_is_glb : ∀ (a : α) (s : set α), is_glb s a → tendsto (coe : s → α) at_bot (𝓝 a))
instance order_dual.Sup_convergence_class [preorder α] [topological_space α]
[Inf_convergence_class α] : Sup_convergence_class αᵒᵈ :=
⟨‹Inf_convergence_class α›.1⟩
instance order_dual.Inf_convergence_class [preorder α] [topological_space α]
[Sup_convergence_class α] : Inf_convergence_class αᵒᵈ :=
⟨‹Sup_convergence_class α›.1⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance linear_order.Sup_convergence_class [topological_space α] [linear_order α]
[order_topology α] : Sup_convergence_class α :=
begin
refine ⟨λ a s ha, tendsto_order.2 ⟨λ b hb, _, λ b hb, _⟩⟩,
{ rcases ha.exists_between hb with ⟨c, hcs, bc, bca⟩,
lift c to s using hcs,
refine (eventually_ge_at_top c).mono (λ x hx, bc.trans_le hx) },
{ exact eventually_of_forall (λ x, (ha.1 x.2).trans_lt hb) }
end
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance linear_order.Inf_convergence_class [topological_space α] [linear_order α]
[order_topology α] : Inf_convergence_class α :=
show Inf_convergence_class αᵒᵈᵒᵈ, from order_dual.Inf_convergence_class
section
variables {ι : Type*} [preorder ι] [topological_space α]
section is_lub
variables [preorder α] [Sup_convergence_class α] {f : ι → α} {a : α}
lemma tendsto_at_top_is_lub (h_mono : monotone f) (ha : is_lub (set.range f) a) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) :=
begin
suffices : tendsto (range_factorization f) at_top at_top,
from (Sup_convergence_class.tendsto_coe_at_top_is_lub _ _ ha).comp this,
exact h_mono.range_factorization.tendsto_at_top_at_top (λ b, b.2.imp $ λ a ha, ha.ge)
end
lemma tendsto_at_bot_is_lub (h_anti : antitone f) (ha : is_lub (set.range f) a) :
tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 a) :=
by convert tendsto_at_top_is_lub h_anti.dual_left ha
end is_lub
section is_glb
variables [preorder α] [Inf_convergence_class α] {f : ι → α} {a : α}
lemma tendsto_at_bot_is_glb (h_mono : monotone f) (ha : is_glb (set.range f) a) :
tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 a) :=
by convert tendsto_at_top_is_lub h_mono.dual ha.dual
lemma tendsto_at_top_is_glb (h_anti : antitone f) (ha : is_glb (set.range f) a) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) :=
by convert tendsto_at_bot_is_lub h_anti.dual ha.dual
end is_glb
section csupr
variables [conditionally_complete_lattice α] [Sup_convergence_class α] {f : ι → α} {a : α}
lemma tendsto_at_top_csupr (h_mono : monotone f) (hbdd : bdd_above $ range f) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨆i, f i)) :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty ι,
exacts [tendsto_of_is_empty, tendsto_at_top_is_lub h_mono (is_lub_csupr hbdd)]
end
lemma tendsto_at_bot_csupr (h_anti : antitone f) (hbdd : bdd_above $ range f) :
tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 (⨆ i, f i)) :=
by convert tendsto_at_top_csupr h_anti.dual hbdd.dual
end csupr
section cinfi
variables [conditionally_complete_lattice α] [Inf_convergence_class α] {f : ι → α} {a : α}
lemma tendsto_at_bot_cinfi (h_mono : monotone f) (hbdd : bdd_below $ range f) :
tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 (⨅ i, f i)) :=
by convert tendsto_at_top_csupr h_mono.dual hbdd.dual
lemma tendsto_at_top_cinfi (h_anti : antitone f) (hbdd : bdd_below $ range f) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨅ i, f i)) :=
by convert tendsto_at_bot_csupr h_anti.dual hbdd.dual
end cinfi
section supr
variables [complete_lattice α] [Sup_convergence_class α] {f : ι → α} {a : α}
lemma tendsto_at_top_supr (h_mono : monotone f) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨆i, f i)) :=
tendsto_at_top_csupr h_mono (order_top.bdd_above _)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_supr (h_anti : antitone f) :
tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 (⨆i, f i)) :=
tendsto_at_bot_csupr h_anti (order_top.bdd_above _)
end supr
section infi
variables [complete_lattice α] [Inf_convergence_class α] {f : ι → α} {a : α}
lemma tendsto_at_bot_infi (h_mono : monotone f) : tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 (⨅i, f i)) :=
tendsto_at_bot_cinfi h_mono (order_bot.bdd_below _)
lemma tendsto_at_top_infi (h_anti : antitone f) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨅i, f i)) :=
tendsto_at_top_cinfi h_anti (order_bot.bdd_below _)
end infi
end
instance [preorder α] [preorder β] [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
[Sup_convergence_class α] [Sup_convergence_class β] : Sup_convergence_class (α × β) :=
begin
constructor,
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ s h,
rw [is_lub_prod, ← range_restrict, ← range_restrict] at h,
have A : tendsto (λ x : s, (x : α × β).1) at_top (𝓝 a),
from tendsto_at_top_is_lub (monotone_fst.restrict s) h.1,
have B : tendsto (λ x : s, (x : α × β).2) at_top (𝓝 b),
from tendsto_at_top_is_lub (monotone_snd.restrict s) h.2,
convert A.prod_mk_nhds B,
ext1 ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩, refl
end
instance [preorder α] [preorder β] [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
[Inf_convergence_class α] [Inf_convergence_class β] : Inf_convergence_class (α × β) :=
show Inf_convergence_class (αᵒᵈ × βᵒᵈ)ᵒᵈ, from order_dual.Inf_convergence_class
instance {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, preorder (α i)] [Π i, topological_space (α i)]
[Π i, Sup_convergence_class (α i)] : Sup_convergence_class (Π i, α i) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ f s h, _⟩,
simp only [is_lub_pi, ← range_restrict] at h,
exact tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (λ i, tendsto_at_top_is_lub ((monotone_eval _).restrict _) (h i))
end
instance {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, preorder (α i)] [Π i, topological_space (α i)]
[Π i, Inf_convergence_class (α i)] : Inf_convergence_class (Π i, α i) :=
show Inf_convergence_class (Π i, (α i)ᵒᵈ)ᵒᵈ, from order_dual.Inf_convergence_class
instance pi.Sup_convergence_class' {ι : Type*} [preorder α] [topological_space α]
[Sup_convergence_class α] : Sup_convergence_class (ι → α) :=
pi.Sup_convergence_class
instance pi.Inf_convergence_class' {ι : Type*} [preorder α] [topological_space α]
[Inf_convergence_class α] : Inf_convergence_class (ι → α) :=
pi.Inf_convergence_class
lemma tendsto_of_monotone {ι α : Type*} [preorder ι] [topological_space α]
[conditionally_complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α] {f : ι → α} (h_mono : monotone f) :
tendsto f at_top at_top ∨ (∃ l, tendsto f at_top (𝓝 l)) :=
if H : bdd_above (range f) then or.inr ⟨_, tendsto_at_top_csupr h_mono H⟩
else or.inl $ tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone' h_mono H
lemma tendsto_iff_tendsto_subseq_of_monotone {ι₁ ι₂ α : Type*} [semilattice_sup ι₁] [preorder ι₂]
[nonempty ι₁] [topological_space α] [conditionally_complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
[no_max_order α] {f : ι₂ → α} {φ : ι₁ → ι₂} {l : α} (hf : monotone f)
(hg : tendsto φ at_top at_top) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 l) ↔ tendsto (f ∘ φ) at_top (𝓝 l) :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ exact h.comp hg },
{ rcases tendsto_of_monotone hf with h' | ⟨l', hl'⟩,
{ exact (not_tendsto_at_top_of_tendsto_nhds h (h'.comp hg)).elim },
{ rwa tendsto_nhds_unique h (hl'.comp hg) } }
end
/-! The next family of results, such as `is_lub_of_tendsto_at_top` and `supr_eq_of_tendsto`, are
converses to the standard fact that bounded monotone functions converge. They state, that if a
monotone function `f` tends to `a` along `filter.at_top`, then that value `a` is a least upper bound
for the range of `f`.
Related theorems above (`is_lub.is_lub_of_tendsto`, `is_glb.is_glb_of_tendsto` etc) cover the case
when `f x` tends to `a` as `x` tends to some point `b` in the domain. -/
lemma monotone.ge_of_tendsto [topological_space α] [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α]
[semilattice_sup β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : monotone f)
(ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (b : β) :
f b ≤ a :=
begin
haveI : nonempty β := nonempty.intro b,
exact ge_of_tendsto ha ((eventually_ge_at_top b).mono (λ _ hxy, hf hxy))
end
lemma monotone.le_of_tendsto [topological_space α] [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α]
[semilattice_inf β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : monotone f)
(ha : tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 a)) (b : β) :
a ≤ f b :=
hf.dual.ge_of_tendsto ha b
lemma antitone.le_of_tendsto [topological_space α] [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α]
[semilattice_sup β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : antitone f)
(ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (b : β) :
a ≤ f b :=
hf.dual_right.ge_of_tendsto ha b
lemma antitone.ge_of_tendsto [topological_space α] [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α]
[semilattice_inf β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : antitone f)
(ha : tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 a)) (b : β) :
f b ≤ a :=
hf.dual_right.le_of_tendsto ha b
lemma is_lub_of_tendsto_at_top [topological_space α] [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α]
[nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : monotone f)
(ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
is_lub (set.range f) a :=
begin
split,
{ rintros _ ⟨b, rfl⟩,
exact hf.ge_of_tendsto ha b },
{ exact λ _ hb, le_of_tendsto' ha (λ x, hb (set.mem_range_self x)) }
end
lemma is_glb_of_tendsto_at_bot [topological_space α] [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α]
[nonempty β] [semilattice_inf β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : monotone f)
(ha : tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 a)) :
is_glb (set.range f) a :=
@is_lub_of_tendsto_at_top αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf.dual ha
lemma is_lub_of_tendsto_at_bot [topological_space α] [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α]
[nonempty β] [semilattice_inf β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : antitone f)
(ha : tendsto f at_bot (𝓝 a)) :
is_lub (set.range f) a :=
@is_lub_of_tendsto_at_top α βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf.dual_left ha
lemma is_glb_of_tendsto_at_top [topological_space α] [preorder α] [order_closed_topology α]
[nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : antitone f)
(ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
is_glb (set.range f) a :=
@is_glb_of_tendsto_at_bot α βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf.dual_left ha
lemma supr_eq_of_tendsto {α β} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
[nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : monotone f) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) → supr f = a :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_at_top_supr hf)
lemma infi_eq_of_tendsto {α} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
[nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : antitone f) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) → infi f = a :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_at_top_infi hf)
lemma supr_eq_supr_subseq_of_monotone {ι₁ ι₂ α : Type*} [preorder ι₂] [complete_lattice α]
{l : filter ι₁} [l.ne_bot] {f : ι₂ → α} {φ : ι₁ → ι₂} (hf : monotone f)
(hφ : tendsto φ l at_top) :
(⨆ i, f i) = (⨆ i, f (φ i)) :=
le_antisymm
(supr_mono' $ λ i, exists_imp_exists (λ j (hj : i ≤ φ j), hf hj)
(hφ.eventually $ eventually_ge_at_top i).exists)
(supr_mono' $ λ i, ⟨φ i, le_rfl⟩)
lemma infi_eq_infi_subseq_of_monotone {ι₁ ι₂ α : Type*} [preorder ι₂] [complete_lattice α]
{l : filter ι₁} [l.ne_bot] {f : ι₂ → α} {φ : ι₁ → ι₂} (hf : monotone f)
(hφ : tendsto φ l at_bot) :
(⨅ i, f i) = (⨅ i, f (φ i)) :=
supr_eq_supr_subseq_of_monotone hf.dual hφ
|
38dbb825be0e787566fc48614865dfd06d178177 | 510e96af568b060ed5858226ad954c258549f143 | /algebra/lattice/zorn.lean | b6ceda8ee3a94b3fdd281d63241565d23505defe | [] | no_license | Shamrock-Frost/library_dev | cb6d1739237d81e17720118f72ba0a6db8a5906b | 0245c71e4931d3aceeacf0aea776454f6ee03c9c | refs/heads/master | 1,609,481,034,595 | 1,500,165,215,000 | 1,500,165,347,000 | 97,350,162 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,500,164,969,000 | 1,500,164,969,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,706 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Zorn's lemmas.
Ported from Isabelle/HOL (written by Jacques D. Fleuriot, Tobias Nipkow, and Christian Sternagel).
-/
import ...data.set
noncomputable theory
universes u
open set classical
local attribute [instance] decidable_inhabited
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
namespace zorn
section chain
parameters {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop}
local infix ` ≺ `:50 := r
def chain (c : set α) := pairwise_on c (λx y, x ≺ y ∨ y ≺ x)
lemma chain_insert {c : set α} {a : α} (hc : chain c) (ha : ∀b∈c, b ≠ a → a ≺ b ∨ b ≺ a) :
chain (insert a c) :=
forall_insert_of_forall
(assume x hx, forall_insert_of_forall (hc x hx) (assume hneq, (ha x hx hneq).symm))
(forall_insert_of_forall (assume x hx hneq, ha x hx $ assume h', hneq h'.symm) (assume h, (h rfl).rec _))
def super_chain (c₁ c₂ : set α) := chain c₂ ∧ c₁ ⊂ c₂
def is_max_chain (c : set α) := chain c ∧ ¬ (∃c', super_chain c c')
def succ_chain (c : set α) :=
if h : ∃c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c' then some h else c
lemma succ_spec {c : set α} (h : ∃c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c') :
super_chain c (succ_chain c) :=
let ⟨c', hc'⟩ := h in
have chain c ∧ super_chain c (some h),
from @some_spec _ (λc', chain c ∧ super_chain c c') _,
by simp [succ_chain, dif_pos, h, this.right]
lemma chain_succ {c : set α} (hc : chain c) : chain (succ_chain c) :=
if h : ∃c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c' then
(succ_spec h).left
else
by simp [succ_chain, dif_neg, h]; exact hc
lemma super_of_not_max {c : set α} (hc₁ : chain c) (hc₂ : ¬ is_max_chain c) :
super_chain c (succ_chain c) :=
begin
simp [is_max_chain, not_and_iff, not_not_iff] at hc₂,
exact have ∃c', super_chain c c', from hc₂.neg_resolve_left hc₁,
let ⟨c', hc'⟩ := this in
show super_chain c (succ_chain c),
from succ_spec ⟨c', hc₁, hc'⟩
end
lemma succ_increasing {c : set α} : c ⊆ succ_chain c :=
if h : ∃c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c' then
have super_chain c (succ_chain c), from succ_spec h,
this.right.left
else by simp [succ_chain, dif_neg, h, subset.refl]
inductive chain_closure : set α → Prop
| succ : ∀{s}, chain_closure s → chain_closure (succ_chain s)
| union : ∀{s}, (∀a∈s, chain_closure a) → chain_closure (⋃₀ s)
lemma chain_closure_empty : chain_closure ∅ :=
have chain_closure (⋃₀ ∅),
from chain_closure.union $ assume a h, h.rec _,
by simp at this; assumption
lemma chain_closure_closure : chain_closure (⋃₀ {s | chain_closure s}) :=
chain_closure.union $ assume s hs, hs
variables {c c₁ c₂ c₃ : set α}
private lemma chain_closure_succ_total_aux (hc₁ : chain_closure c₁) (hc₂ : chain_closure c₂)
(h : ∀{c₃}, chain_closure c₃ → c₃ ⊆ c₂ → c₂ = c₃ ∨ succ_chain c₃ ⊆ c₂) :
c₁ ⊆ c₂ ∨ succ_chain c₂ ⊆ c₁ :=
begin
induction hc₁,
case _root_.zorn.chain_closure.succ c₃ hc₃ ih {
cases ih with ih ih,
{ have h := h hc₃ ih,
cases h with h h,
{ exact (or.inr $ h ▸ subset.refl _) },
{ exact (or.inl h) } },
{ exact (or.inr $ subset.trans ih succ_increasing) } },
case _root_.zorn.chain_closure.union s hs ih {
exact (or_of_not_implies $ assume hn, sUnion_subset $ assume a ha,
have a ⊆ c₂ ∨ succ_chain c₂ ⊆ a, from ih a ha,
this.resolve_right $ assume h, hn $ subset.trans h $ subset_sUnion_of_mem ha) }
end
private lemma chain_closure_succ_total (hc₁ : chain_closure c₁) (hc₂ : chain_closure c₂) (h : c₁ ⊆ c₂) :
c₂ = c₁ ∨ succ_chain c₁ ⊆ c₂ :=
begin
induction hc₂ generalizing c₁ hc₁ h,
case _root_.zorn.chain_closure.succ c₂ hc₂ ih {
have h₁ : c₁ ⊆ c₂ ∨ @succ_chain α r c₂ ⊆ c₁ :=
(chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₁ hc₂ $ assume c₁, ih),
cases h₁ with h₁ h₁,
{ have h₂ := ih hc₁ h₁,
cases h₂ with h₂ h₂,
{ exact (or.inr $ h₂ ▸ subset.refl _) },
{ exact (or.inr $ subset.trans h₂ succ_increasing) } },
{ exact (or.inl $ subset.antisymm h₁ h) } },
case _root_.zorn.chain_closure.union s hs ih {
apply or.imp (assume h', subset.antisymm h' h) id,
apply classical.by_contradiction,
simp [not_or_iff, sUnion_subset_iff, not_forall_iff_exists_not, not_implies_iff_and_not],
intro h, cases h with h₁ h₂, cases h₂ with c₃ h₂, cases h₂ with h₂ hc₃,
have h := chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₁ (hs c₃ hc₃) (assume c₄, ih _ hc₃),
cases h with h h,
{ have h' := ih c₃ hc₃ hc₁ h,
cases h' with h' h',
{ exact (h₂ $ h' ▸ subset.refl _) },
{ exact (h₁ $ subset.trans h' $ subset_sUnion_of_mem hc₃) } },
{ exact (h₂ $ subset.trans succ_increasing h) } }
end
lemma chain_closure_total (hc₁ : chain_closure c₁) (hc₂ : chain_closure c₂) : c₁ ⊆ c₂ ∨ c₂ ⊆ c₁ :=
have c₁ ⊆ c₂ ∨ succ_chain c₂ ⊆ c₁,
from chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₁ hc₂ $ assume c₃ hc₃, chain_closure_succ_total hc₃ hc₂,
or.imp_right (suppose succ_chain c₂ ⊆ c₁, subset.trans succ_increasing this) this
lemma chain_closure_succ_fixpoint (hc₁ : chain_closure c₁) (hc₂ : chain_closure c₂)
(h_eq : succ_chain c₂ = c₂) : c₁ ⊆ c₂ :=
begin
induction hc₁,
case _root_.zorn.chain_closure.succ c₁ hc₁ h {
exact or.elim (chain_closure_succ_total hc₁ hc₂ h)
(assume h, h ▸ h_eq.symm ▸ subset.refl c₂) id },
case _root_.zorn.chain_closure.union s hs ih {
exact (sUnion_subset $ assume c₁ hc₁, ih c₁ hc₁) }
end
lemma chain_closure_succ_fixpoint_iff (hc : chain_closure c) :
succ_chain c = c ↔ c = ⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c} :=
⟨assume h, subset.antisymm
(subset_sUnion_of_mem hc)
(chain_closure_succ_fixpoint chain_closure_closure hc h),
suppose c = ⋃₀{c : set α | chain_closure c},
subset.antisymm
(calc succ_chain c ⊆ ⋃₀{c : set α | chain_closure c} :
subset_sUnion_of_mem $ chain_closure.succ hc
... = c : this.symm)
succ_increasing⟩
lemma chain_chain_closure (hc : chain_closure c) : chain c :=
begin
induction hc,
case _root_.zorn.chain_closure.succ c hc h {
exact chain_succ h },
case _root_.zorn.chain_closure.union s hs h {
have h : ∀c∈s, zorn.chain c := h,
exact assume c₁ ⟨t₁, ht₁, (hc₁ : c₁ ∈ t₁)⟩ c₂ ⟨t₂, ht₂, (hc₂ : c₂ ∈ t₂)⟩ hneq,
have t₁ ⊆ t₂ ∨ t₂ ⊆ t₁, from chain_closure_total (hs _ ht₁) (hs _ ht₂),
or.elim this
(suppose t₁ ⊆ t₂, h t₂ ht₂ c₁ (this hc₁) c₂ hc₂ hneq)
(suppose t₂ ⊆ t₁, h t₁ ht₁ c₁ hc₁ c₂ (this hc₂) hneq) }
end
def max_chain := (⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c})
/-- Hausdorff's maximality principle
There exists a maximal totally ordered subset of `α`.
Note that we do not require `α` to be partially ordered by `r`. -/
lemma max_chain_spec : is_max_chain max_chain :=
classical.by_contradiction $
suppose ¬ is_max_chain (⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c}),
have super_chain (⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c}) (succ_chain (⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c})),
from super_of_not_max (chain_chain_closure chain_closure_closure) this,
let ⟨h₁, h₂, (h₃ : (⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c}) ≠ succ_chain (⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c}))⟩ := this in
have succ_chain (⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c}) = (⋃₀ {c | chain_closure c}),
from (chain_closure_succ_fixpoint_iff chain_closure_closure).mpr rfl,
h₃ this.symm
/-- Zorn's lemma
If every chain has an upper bound, then there is a maximal element -/
lemma zorn (h : ∀c, chain c → ∃ub, ∀a∈c, a ≺ ub) (trans : ∀{a b c}, a ≺ b → b ≺ c → a ≺ c) :
∃m, ∀a, m ≺ a → a ≺ m :=
have ∃ub, ∀a∈max_chain, a ≺ ub,
from h _ $ max_chain_spec.left,
let ⟨ub, (hub : ∀a∈max_chain, a ≺ ub)⟩ := this in
⟨ub, assume a ha,
have chain (insert a max_chain),
from chain_insert max_chain_spec.left $ assume b hb _, or.inr $ trans (hub b hb) ha,
have a ∈ max_chain, from
classical.by_contradiction $ assume h : a ∉ max_chain,
max_chain_spec.right $ ⟨insert a max_chain, this, ssubset_insert h⟩,
hub a this⟩
end chain
lemma zorn_weak_order {α : Type u} [weak_order α]
(h : ∀c:set α, @chain α (≤) c → ∃ub, ∀a∈c, a ≤ ub) : ∃m:α, ∀a, m ≤ a → a = m :=
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := @zorn α (≤) h (assume a b c, le_trans) in
⟨m, assume a ha, le_antisymm (hm a ha) ha⟩
end zorn
|
7f5fa4762507450a551010fd705af02938d53910 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/algebra/group/inj_surj.lean | 71549a93f902983496f9ffdd905824ecdaedc3e4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,328 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import algebra.group.defs
import logic.function.basic
import data.int.cast.defs
/-!
# Lifting algebraic data classes along injective/surjective maps
This file provides definitions that are meant to deal with
situations such as the following:
Suppose that `G` is a group, and `H` is a type endowed with
`has_one H`, `has_mul H`, and `has_inv H`.
Suppose furthermore, that `f : G → H` is a surjective map
that respects the multiplication, and the unit elements.
Then `H` satisfies the group axioms.
The relevant definition in this case is `function.surjective.group`.
Dually, there is also `function.injective.group`.
And there are versions for (additive) (commutative) semigroups/monoids.
-/
namespace function
/-!
### Injective
-/
namespace injective
variables {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [has_mul M₁]
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `*` to a semigroup.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `+` is an additive semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `+` to an additive semigroup."]
protected def semigroup [semigroup M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
semigroup M₁ :=
{ mul_assoc := λ x y z, hf $ by erw [mul, mul, mul, mul, mul_assoc],
..‹has_mul M₁› }
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a commutative semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `*` to a commutative semigroup.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `+` is an additive commutative semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `+` to an additive commutative semigroup."]
protected def comm_semigroup [comm_semigroup M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
comm_semigroup M₁ :=
{ mul_comm := λ x y, hf $ by erw [mul, mul, mul_comm],
.. hf.semigroup f mul }
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a left cancel semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `*` to a left cancel semigroup.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive add_left_cancel_semigroup
"A type endowed with `+` is an additive left cancel semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `+` to an additive left cancel semigroup."]
protected def left_cancel_semigroup [left_cancel_semigroup M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
left_cancel_semigroup M₁ :=
{ mul := (*),
mul_left_cancel := λ x y z H, hf $ (mul_right_inj (f x)).1 $ by erw [← mul, ← mul, H]; refl,
.. hf.semigroup f mul }
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a right cancel semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `*` to a right cancel semigroup.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive add_right_cancel_semigroup
"A type endowed with `+` is an additive right cancel semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `+` to an additive right cancel semigroup."]
protected def right_cancel_semigroup [right_cancel_semigroup M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
right_cancel_semigroup M₁ :=
{ mul := (*),
mul_right_cancel := λ x y z H, hf $ (mul_left_inj (f y)).1 $ by erw [← mul, ← mul, H]; refl,
.. hf.semigroup f mul }
variables [has_one M₁]
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a mul_one_class,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a mul_one_class.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an add_zero_class,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an add_zero_class."]
protected def mul_one_class [mul_one_class M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
mul_one_class M₁ :=
{ one_mul := λ x, hf $ by erw [mul, one, one_mul],
mul_one := λ x, hf $ by erw [mul, one, mul_one],
..‹has_one M₁›, ..‹has_mul M₁› }
variables [has_pow M₁ ℕ]
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a monoid.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive monoid.
This version takes a custom `nsmul` as a `[has_smul ℕ M₁]` argument."]
protected def monoid [monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
monoid M₁ :=
{ npow := λ n x, x ^ n,
npow_zero' := λ x, hf $ by erw [npow, one, pow_zero],
npow_succ' := λ n x, hf $ by erw [npow, pow_succ, mul, npow],
.. hf.semigroup f mul, .. hf.mul_one_class f one mul }
/-- A type endowed with `0`, `1` and `+` is an additive monoid with one,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0`, `1` and `+` to an additive monoid with one.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def add_monoid_with_one {M₁}
[has_zero M₁] [has_one M₁] [has_add M₁] [has_smul ℕ M₁] [has_nat_cast M₁]
[add_monoid_with_one M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(nsmul : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) :
add_monoid_with_one M₁ :=
{ nat_cast := coe,
nat_cast_zero := hf (by erw [nat_cast, nat.cast_zero, zero]),
nat_cast_succ := λ n, hf (by erw [nat_cast, nat.cast_succ, add, one, nat_cast]),
one := 1, .. hf.add_monoid f zero add nsmul }
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a left cancel monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a left cancel monoid.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive add_left_cancel_monoid
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive left cancel monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive left cancel monoid."]
protected def left_cancel_monoid [left_cancel_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
left_cancel_monoid M₁ :=
{ .. hf.left_cancel_semigroup f mul, .. hf.monoid f one mul npow }
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a right cancel monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a right cancel monoid.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive add_right_cancel_monoid
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive left cancel monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive left cancel monoid."]
protected def right_cancel_monoid [right_cancel_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
right_cancel_monoid M₁ :=
{ .. hf.right_cancel_semigroup f mul, .. hf.monoid f one mul npow }
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a cancel monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a cancel monoid.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive add_cancel_monoid
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive left cancel monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive left cancel monoid."]
protected def cancel_monoid [cancel_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
cancel_monoid M₁ :=
{ .. hf.left_cancel_monoid f one mul npow, .. hf.right_cancel_monoid f one mul npow }
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a commutative monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a commutative monoid.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive commutative monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive commutative monoid."]
protected def comm_monoid [comm_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
comm_monoid M₁ :=
{ .. hf.comm_semigroup f mul, .. hf.monoid f one mul npow }
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a cancel commutative monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a cancel commutative monoid.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive add_cancel_comm_monoid
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive cancel commutative monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive cancel commutative monoid."]
protected def cancel_comm_monoid [cancel_comm_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
cancel_comm_monoid M₁ :=
{ .. hf.left_cancel_semigroup f mul, .. hf.comm_monoid f one mul npow }
/-- A type has an involutive inversion if it admits a surjective map that preserves `⁻¹` to a type
which has an involutive inversion. -/
@[reducible, to_additive "A type has an involutive negation if it admits a surjective map that
preserves `⁻¹` to a type which has an involutive inversion."] --See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def has_involutive_inv {M₁ : Type*} [has_inv M₁][has_involutive_inv M₂]
(f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) :
has_involutive_inv M₁ :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
inv_inv := λ x, hf $ by rw [inv, inv, inv_inv] }
variables [has_inv M₁] [has_div M₁] [has_pow M₁ ℤ]
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` is a `div_inv_monoid`
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` to a `div_inv_monoid`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive sub_neg_monoid
"A type endowed with `0`, `+`, unary `-`, and binary `-` is a `sub_neg_monoid`
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0`, `+`, unary `-`, and binary `-` to
a `sub_neg_monoid`.
This version takes custom `nsmul` and `zsmul` as `[has_smul ℕ M₁]` and
`[has_smul ℤ M₁]` arguments."]
protected def div_inv_monoid [div_inv_monoid M₂]
(f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹)
(div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
div_inv_monoid M₁ :=
{ zpow := λ n x, x ^ n,
zpow_zero' := λ x, hf $ by erw [zpow, zpow_zero, one],
zpow_succ' := λ n x, hf $ by erw [zpow, mul, zpow_of_nat, pow_succ, zpow, zpow_of_nat],
zpow_neg' := λ n x, hf $ by erw [zpow, zpow_neg_succ_of_nat, inv, zpow, zpow_coe_nat],
div_eq_mul_inv := λ x y, hf $ by erw [div, mul, inv, div_eq_mul_inv],
.. hf.monoid f one mul npow, .. ‹has_inv M₁›, .. ‹has_div M₁› }
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` is a `division_monoid`
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` to a `division_monoid`. -/
@[reducible, to_additive subtraction_monoid
"A type endowed with `0`, `+`, unary `-`, and binary `-` is a `subtraction_monoid`
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0`, `+`, unary `-`, and binary `-` to
a `subtraction_monoid`.
This version takes custom `nsmul` and `zsmul` as `[has_smul ℕ M₁]` and
`[has_smul ℤ M₁]` arguments."] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def division_monoid [division_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹)
(div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
division_monoid M₁ :=
{ mul_inv_rev := λ x y, hf $ by erw [inv, mul, mul_inv_rev, mul, inv, inv],
inv_eq_of_mul := λ x y h, hf $ by erw [inv, inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right (by erw [←mul, h, one])],
..hf.div_inv_monoid f one mul inv div npow zpow, ..hf.has_involutive_inv f inv }
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` is a `division_comm_monoid`
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` to a `division_comm_monoid`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive subtraction_comm_monoid
"A type endowed with `0`, `+`, unary `-`, and binary `-` is a `subtraction_comm_monoid`
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0`, `+`, unary `-`, and binary `-` to
a `subtraction_comm_monoid`.
This version takes custom `nsmul` and `zsmul` as `[has_smul ℕ M₁]` and
`[has_smul ℤ M₁]` arguments."] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def division_comm_monoid [division_comm_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹)
(div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
division_comm_monoid M₁ :=
{ ..hf.division_monoid f one mul inv div npow zpow, .. hf.comm_semigroup f mul }
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` is a group,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` to a group.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive group,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive group."]
protected def group [group M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ x, f (x⁻¹) = (f x)⁻¹)
(div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
group M₁ :=
{ mul_left_inv := λ x, hf $ by erw [mul, inv, mul_left_inv, one],
.. hf.div_inv_monoid f one mul inv div npow zpow }
/-- A type endowed with `0`, `1` and `+` is an additive group with one,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0`, `1` and `+` to an additive group with one.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def add_group_with_one {M₁} [has_zero M₁] [has_one M₁] [has_add M₁] [has_smul ℕ M₁]
[has_neg M₁] [has_sub M₁] [has_smul ℤ M₁] [has_nat_cast M₁] [has_int_cast M₁]
[add_group_with_one M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (- x) = - f x) (sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y)
(nsmul : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (n • x) = n • f x) (zsmul : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) (int_cast : ∀ n : ℤ, f n = n) :
add_group_with_one M₁ :=
{ int_cast := coe,
int_cast_of_nat := λ n, hf (by simp only [nat_cast, int_cast, int.cast_coe_nat]),
int_cast_neg_succ_of_nat :=
λ n, hf (by erw [int_cast, neg, nat_cast, int.cast_neg, int.cast_coe_nat]),
.. hf.add_group f zero add neg sub nsmul zsmul,
.. hf.add_monoid_with_one f zero one add nsmul nat_cast }
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` is a commutative group,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` to a commutative group.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive commutative group,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive commutative group."]
protected def comm_group [comm_group M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ x, f (x⁻¹) = (f x)⁻¹)
(div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
comm_group M₁ :=
{ .. hf.comm_monoid f one mul npow, .. hf.group f one mul inv div npow zpow }
end injective
/-!
### Surjective
-/
namespace surjective
variables {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [has_mul M₂]
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a semigroup,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `*` from a semigroup.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `+` is an additive semigroup,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `+` from an additive semigroup."]
protected def semigroup [semigroup M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
semigroup M₂ :=
{ mul_assoc := hf.forall₃.2 $ λ x y z, by simp only [← mul, mul_assoc],
..‹has_mul M₂› }
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a commutative semigroup,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `*` from a commutative semigroup.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `+` is an additive commutative semigroup,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `+` from an additive commutative semigroup."]
protected def comm_semigroup [comm_semigroup M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
comm_semigroup M₂ :=
{ mul_comm := hf.forall₂.2 $ λ x y, by erw [← mul, ← mul, mul_comm],
.. hf.semigroup f mul }
variables [has_one M₂]
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a mul_one_class,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1` and `*` from a mul_one_class.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an add_zero_class,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an add_zero_class."]
protected def mul_one_class [mul_one_class M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
mul_one_class M₂ :=
{ one_mul := hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by erw [← one, ← mul, one_mul],
mul_one := hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by erw [← one, ← mul, mul_one],
..‹has_one M₂›, ..‹has_mul M₂› }
variables [has_pow M₂ ℕ]
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a monoid,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a monoid.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive monoid,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive monoid.
This version takes a custom `nsmul` as a `[has_smul ℕ M₂]` argument."]
protected def monoid [monoid M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
monoid M₂ :=
{ npow := λ n x, x ^ n,
npow_zero' := hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by erw [←npow, pow_zero, ←one],
npow_succ' := λ n, hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by erw [←npow, pow_succ, ←npow, ←mul],
.. hf.semigroup f mul, .. hf.mul_one_class f one mul }
/-- A type endowed with `0`, `1` and `+` is an additive monoid with one,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `0`, `1` and `*` from an additive monoid with one.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible]
protected def add_monoid_with_one
{M₂} [has_zero M₂] [has_one M₂] [has_add M₂] [has_smul ℕ M₂] [has_nat_cast M₂]
[add_monoid_with_one M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(nsmul : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) :
add_monoid_with_one M₂ :=
{ nat_cast := coe,
nat_cast_zero := by { rw [← nat_cast, nat.cast_zero, zero], refl },
nat_cast_succ := λ n, by { rw [← nat_cast, nat.cast_succ, add, one, nat_cast], refl },
one := 1, .. hf.add_monoid f zero add nsmul }
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a commutative monoid,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1` and `*` from a commutative monoid.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive commutative monoid,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive commutative monoid."]
protected def comm_monoid [comm_monoid M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
comm_monoid M₂ :=
{ .. hf.comm_semigroup f mul, .. hf.monoid f one mul npow }
/-- A type has an involutive inversion if it admits a surjective map that preserves `⁻¹` to a type
which has an involutive inversion. -/
@[reducible, to_additive "A type has an involutive negation if it admits a surjective map that
preserves `⁻¹` to a type which has an involutive inversion."] --See note [reducible non-instances]
protected def has_involutive_inv {M₂ : Type*} [has_inv M₂] [has_involutive_inv M₁]
(f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) :
has_involutive_inv M₂ :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
inv_inv := hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by erw [←inv, ←inv, inv_inv] }
variables [has_inv M₂] [has_div M₂] [has_pow M₂ ℤ]
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` is a `div_inv_monoid`
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` to a `div_inv_monoid`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive sub_neg_monoid
"A type endowed with `0`, `+`, unary `-`, and binary `-` is a `sub_neg_monoid`
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `0`, `+`, unary `-`, and binary `-` to
a `sub_neg_monoid`."]
protected def div_inv_monoid [div_inv_monoid M₁]
(f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹)
(div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
div_inv_monoid M₂ :=
{ zpow := λ n x, x ^ n,
zpow_zero' := hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by erw [←zpow, zpow_zero, ←one],
zpow_succ' := λ n, hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by
erw [←zpow, ←zpow, zpow_of_nat, zpow_of_nat, pow_succ, ←mul],
zpow_neg' := λ n, hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by
erw [←zpow, ←zpow, zpow_neg_succ_of_nat, zpow_coe_nat, inv],
div_eq_mul_inv := hf.forall₂.2 $ λ x y, by erw [← inv, ← mul, ← div, div_eq_mul_inv],
.. hf.monoid f one mul npow, .. ‹has_div M₂›, .. ‹has_inv M₂› }
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` is a group,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` to a group.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive group,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive group."]
protected def group [group M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ x, f (x⁻¹) = (f x)⁻¹)
(div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
group M₂ :=
{ mul_left_inv := hf.forall.2 $ λ x, by erw [← inv, ← mul, mul_left_inv, one]; refl,
.. hf.div_inv_monoid f one mul inv div npow zpow }
/-- A type endowed with `0`, `1`, `+` is an additive group with one,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `0`, `1`, and `+` to an additive group with one.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
protected def add_group_with_one
{M₂} [has_zero M₂] [has_one M₂] [has_add M₂] [has_neg M₂] [has_sub M₂]
[has_smul ℕ M₂] [has_smul ℤ M₂] [has_nat_cast M₂] [has_int_cast M₂]
[add_group_with_one M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(zero : f 0 = 0) (one : f 1 = 1) (add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(neg : ∀ x, f (- x) = - f x) (sub : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y)
(nsmul : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (n • x) = n • f x) (zsmul : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (n • x) = n • f x)
(nat_cast : ∀ n : ℕ, f n = n) (int_cast : ∀ n : ℤ, f n = n) :
add_group_with_one M₂ :=
{ int_cast := coe,
int_cast_of_nat := λ n, by rw [← int_cast, int.cast_coe_nat, nat_cast],
int_cast_neg_succ_of_nat := λ n,
by { rw [← int_cast, int.cast_neg, int.cast_coe_nat, neg, nat_cast], refl },
.. hf.add_monoid_with_one f zero one add nsmul nat_cast,
.. hf.add_group f zero add neg sub nsmul zsmul }
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` is a commutative group,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` from a commutative group.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[reducible, to_additive
"A type endowed with `0` and `+` is an additive commutative group,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `0` and `+` to an additive commutative group."]
protected def comm_group [comm_group M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ x, f (x⁻¹) = (f x)⁻¹)
(div : ∀ x y, f (x / y) = f x / f y) (npow : ∀ x (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(zpow : ∀ x (n : ℤ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n) :
comm_group M₂ :=
{ .. hf.comm_monoid f one mul npow, .. hf.group f one mul inv div npow zpow }
end surjective
end function
|
297f74a5a26e997042fa846051b63dc095a6b82c | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/analysis/convex/combination.lean | 8cc8ae375c102830901e70519b8eadeb3ac37ea2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,280 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudriashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudriashov
-/
import algebra.big_operators.order
import analysis.convex.hull
import linear_algebra.affine_space.basis
/-!
# Convex combinations
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines convex combinations of points in a vector space.
## Main declarations
* `finset.center_mass`: Center of mass of a finite family of points.
## Implementation notes
We divide by the sum of the weights in the definition of `finset.center_mass` because of the way
mathematical arguments go: one doesn't change weights, but merely adds some. This also makes a few
lemmas unconditional on the sum of the weights being `1`.
-/
open set function
open_locale big_operators classical pointwise
universes u u'
variables {R E F ι ι' α : Type*} [linear_ordered_field R] [add_comm_group E] [add_comm_group F]
[linear_ordered_add_comm_group α] [module R E] [module R F] [module R α] [ordered_smul R α]
{s : set E}
/-- Center of mass of a finite collection of points with prescribed weights.
Note that we require neither `0 ≤ w i` nor `∑ w = 1`. -/
def finset.center_mass (t : finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E) : E :=
(∑ i in t, w i)⁻¹ • (∑ i in t, w i • z i)
variables (i j : ι) (c : R) (t : finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
open finset
lemma finset.center_mass_empty : (∅ : finset ι).center_mass w z = 0 :=
by simp only [center_mass, sum_empty, smul_zero]
lemma finset.center_mass_pair (hne : i ≠ j) :
({i, j} : finset ι).center_mass w z = (w i / (w i + w j)) • z i + (w j / (w i + w j)) • z j :=
by simp only [center_mass, sum_pair hne, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, div_eq_inv_mul]
variable {w}
lemma finset.center_mass_insert (ha : i ∉ t) (hw : ∑ j in t, w j ≠ 0) :
(insert i t).center_mass w z = (w i / (w i + ∑ j in t, w j)) • z i +
((∑ j in t, w j) / (w i + ∑ j in t, w j)) • t.center_mass w z :=
begin
simp only [center_mass, sum_insert ha, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
congr' 2,
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_inv_cancel hw, one_div]
end
lemma finset.center_mass_singleton (hw : w i ≠ 0) : ({i} : finset ι).center_mass w z = z i :=
by rw [center_mass, sum_singleton, sum_singleton, ← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hw, one_smul]
lemma finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 (hw : ∑ i in t, w i = 1) :
t.center_mass w z = ∑ i in t, w i • z i :=
by simp only [finset.center_mass, hw, inv_one, one_smul]
lemma finset.center_mass_smul : t.center_mass w (λ i, c • z i) = c • t.center_mass w z :=
by simp only [finset.center_mass, finset.smul_sum, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, mul_comm c, mul_assoc]
/-- A convex combination of two centers of mass is a center of mass as well. This version
deals with two different index types. -/
lemma finset.center_mass_segment'
(s : finset ι) (t : finset ι') (ws : ι → R) (zs : ι → E) (wt : ι' → R) (zt : ι' → E)
(hws : ∑ i in s, ws i = 1) (hwt : ∑ i in t, wt i = 1) (a b : R) (hab : a + b = 1) :
a • s.center_mass ws zs + b • t.center_mass wt zt =
(s.disj_sum t).center_mass (sum.elim (λ i, a * ws i) (λ j, b * wt j)) (sum.elim zs zt) :=
begin
rw [s.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hws, t.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hwt,
smul_sum, smul_sum, ← finset.sum_sum_elim, finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1],
{ congr' with ⟨⟩; simp only [sum.elim_inl, sum.elim_inr, mul_smul] },
{ rw [sum_sum_elim, ← mul_sum, ← mul_sum, hws, hwt, mul_one, mul_one, hab] }
end
/-- A convex combination of two centers of mass is a center of mass as well. This version
works if two centers of mass share the set of original points. -/
lemma finset.center_mass_segment
(s : finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
(hw₁ : ∑ i in s, w₁ i = 1) (hw₂ : ∑ i in s, w₂ i = 1) (a b : R) (hab : a + b = 1) :
a • s.center_mass w₁ z + b • s.center_mass w₂ z =
s.center_mass (λ i, a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i) z :=
have hw : ∑ i in s, (a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i) = 1,
by simp only [mul_sum.symm, sum_add_distrib, mul_one, *],
by simp only [finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1, smul_sum, sum_add_distrib, add_smul, mul_smul, *]
lemma finset.center_mass_ite_eq (hi : i ∈ t) :
t.center_mass (λ j, if (i = j) then (1 : R) else 0) z = z i :=
begin
rw [finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1],
transitivity ∑ j in t, if (i = j) then z i else 0,
{ congr' with i, split_ifs, exacts [h ▸ one_smul _ _, zero_smul _ _] },
{ rw [sum_ite_eq, if_pos hi] },
{ rw [sum_ite_eq, if_pos hi] }
end
variables {t w}
lemma finset.center_mass_subset {t' : finset ι} (ht : t ⊆ t')
(h : ∀ i ∈ t', i ∉ t → w i = 0) :
t.center_mass w z = t'.center_mass w z :=
begin
rw [center_mass, sum_subset ht h, smul_sum, center_mass, smul_sum],
apply sum_subset ht,
assume i hit' hit,
rw [h i hit' hit, zero_smul, smul_zero]
end
lemma finset.center_mass_filter_ne_zero :
(t.filter (λ i, w i ≠ 0)).center_mass w z = t.center_mass w z :=
finset.center_mass_subset z (filter_subset _ _) $ λ i hit hit',
by simpa only [hit, mem_filter, true_and, ne.def, not_not] using hit'
namespace finset
lemma center_mass_le_sup {s : finset ι} {f : ι → α} {w : ι → R}
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : 0 < ∑ i in s, w i) :
s.center_mass w f ≤ s.sup' (nonempty_of_ne_empty $ by { rintro rfl, simpa using hw₁ }) f :=
begin
rw [center_mass, inv_smul_le_iff hw₁, sum_smul],
exact sum_le_sum (λ i hi, smul_le_smul_of_nonneg (le_sup' _ hi) $ hw₀ i hi),
apply_instance,
end
lemma inf_le_center_mass {s : finset ι} {f : ι → α} {w : ι → R}
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : 0 < ∑ i in s, w i) :
s.inf' (nonempty_of_ne_empty $ by { rintro rfl, simpa using hw₁ }) f ≤ s.center_mass w f :=
@center_mass_le_sup R _ αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hw₀ hw₁
end finset
variable {z}
/-- The center of mass of a finite subset of a convex set belongs to the set
provided that all weights are non-negative, and the total weight is positive. -/
lemma convex.center_mass_mem (hs : convex R s) :
(∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) → (0 < ∑ i in t, w i) → (∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) → t.center_mass w z ∈ s :=
begin
induction t using finset.induction with i t hi ht, { simp [lt_irrefl] },
intros h₀ hpos hmem,
have zi : z i ∈ s, from hmem _ (mem_insert_self _ _),
have hs₀ : ∀ j ∈ t, 0 ≤ w j, from λ j hj, h₀ j $ mem_insert_of_mem hj,
rw [sum_insert hi] at hpos,
by_cases hsum_t : ∑ j in t, w j = 0,
{ have ws : ∀ j ∈ t, w j = 0, from (sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg hs₀).1 hsum_t,
have wz : ∑ j in t, w j • z j = 0, from sum_eq_zero (λ i hi, by simp [ws i hi]),
simp only [center_mass, sum_insert hi, wz, hsum_t, add_zero],
simp only [hsum_t, add_zero] at hpos,
rw [← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel (ne_of_gt hpos), one_smul],
exact zi },
{ rw [finset.center_mass_insert _ _ _ hi hsum_t],
refine convex_iff_div.1 hs zi (ht hs₀ _ _) _ (sum_nonneg hs₀) hpos,
{ exact lt_of_le_of_ne (sum_nonneg hs₀) (ne.symm hsum_t) },
{ intros j hj, exact hmem j (mem_insert_of_mem hj) },
{ exact h₀ _ (mem_insert_self _ _) } }
end
lemma convex.sum_mem (hs : convex R s) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ i in t, w i = 1)
(hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) :
∑ i in t, w i • z i ∈ s :=
by simpa only [h₁, center_mass, inv_one, one_smul] using
hs.center_mass_mem h₀ (h₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) hz
/-- A version of `convex.sum_mem` for `finsum`s. If `s` is a convex set, `w : ι → R` is a family of
nonnegative weights with sum one and `z : ι → E` is a family of elements of a module over `R` such
that `z i ∈ s` whenever `w i ≠ 0``, then the sum `∑ᶠ i, w i • z i` belongs to `s`. See also
`partition_of_unity.finsum_smul_mem_convex`. -/
lemma convex.finsum_mem {ι : Sort*} {w : ι → R} {z : ι → E} {s : set E}
(hs : convex R s) (h₀ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ᶠ i, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i, w i ≠ 0 → z i ∈ s) :
∑ᶠ i, w i • z i ∈ s :=
begin
have hfin_w : (support (w ∘ plift.down)).finite,
{ by_contra H,
rw [finsum, dif_neg H] at h₁,
exact zero_ne_one h₁ },
have hsub : support ((λ i, w i • z i) ∘ plift.down) ⊆ hfin_w.to_finset,
from (support_smul_subset_left _ _).trans hfin_w.coe_to_finset.ge,
rw [finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset hsub],
refine hs.sum_mem (λ _ _, h₀ _) _ (λ i hi, hz _ _),
{ rwa [finsum, dif_pos hfin_w] at h₁ },
{ rwa [hfin_w.mem_to_finset] at hi }
end
lemma convex_iff_sum_mem :
convex R s ↔
(∀ (t : finset E) (w : E → R),
(∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) → ∑ i in t, w i = 1 → (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) → ∑ x in t, w x • x ∈ s ) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hs t w hw₀ hw₁ hts, hs.sum_mem hw₀ hw₁ hts, _⟩,
intros h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab,
by_cases h_cases: x = y,
{ rw [h_cases, ←add_smul, hab, one_smul], exact hy },
{ convert h {x, y} (λ z, if z = y then b else a) _ _ _,
{ simp only [sum_pair h_cases, if_neg h_cases, if_pos rfl] },
{ simp_intros i hi,
cases hi; subst i; simp [ha, hb, if_neg h_cases] },
{ simp only [sum_pair h_cases, if_neg h_cases, if_pos rfl, hab] },
{ simp_intros i hi,
cases hi; subst i; simp [hx, hy, if_neg h_cases] } }
end
lemma finset.center_mass_mem_convex_hull (t : finset ι) {w : ι → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(hws : 0 < ∑ i in t, w i) {z : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) :
t.center_mass w z ∈ convex_hull R s :=
(convex_convex_hull R s).center_mass_mem hw₀ hws (λ i hi, subset_convex_hull R s $ hz i hi)
/-- A refinement of `finset.center_mass_mem_convex_hull` when the indexed family is a `finset` of
the space. -/
lemma finset.center_mass_id_mem_convex_hull (t : finset E) {w : E → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(hws : 0 < ∑ i in t, w i) :
t.center_mass w id ∈ convex_hull R (t : set E) :=
t.center_mass_mem_convex_hull hw₀ hws (λ i, mem_coe.2)
lemma affine_combination_eq_center_mass {ι : Type*} {t : finset ι} {p : ι → E} {w : ι → R}
(hw₂ : ∑ i in t, w i = 1) :
t.affine_combination R p w = center_mass t w p :=
begin
rw [affine_combination_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_of_sum_eq_one _ w _ hw₂ (0 : E),
finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply, vadd_eq_add, add_zero, t.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hw₂],
simp_rw [vsub_eq_sub, sub_zero],
end
lemma affine_combination_mem_convex_hull
{s : finset ι} {v : ι → E} {w : ι → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : s.sum w = 1) :
s.affine_combination R v w ∈ convex_hull R (range v) :=
begin
rw affine_combination_eq_center_mass hw₁,
apply s.center_mass_mem_convex_hull hw₀,
{ simp [hw₁], },
{ simp, },
end
/-- The centroid can be regarded as a center of mass. -/
@[simp] lemma finset.centroid_eq_center_mass (s : finset ι) (hs : s.nonempty) (p : ι → E) :
s.centroid R p = s.center_mass (s.centroid_weights R) p :=
affine_combination_eq_center_mass (s.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_nonempty R hs)
lemma finset.centroid_mem_convex_hull (s : finset E) (hs : s.nonempty) :
s.centroid R id ∈ convex_hull R (s : set E) :=
begin
rw s.centroid_eq_center_mass hs,
apply s.center_mass_id_mem_convex_hull,
{ simp only [inv_nonneg, implies_true_iff, nat.cast_nonneg, finset.centroid_weights_apply], },
{ have hs_card : (s.card : R) ≠ 0, { simp [finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.mp hs] },
simp only [hs_card, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_inv_cancel, ne.def, not_false_iff,
finset.centroid_weights_apply, zero_lt_one] }
end
lemma convex_hull_range_eq_exists_affine_combination (v : ι → E) :
convex_hull R (range v) = { x | ∃ (s : finset ι) (w : ι → R)
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : s.sum w = 1), s.affine_combination R v w = x } :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm (convex_hull_min _ _) _,
{ intros x hx,
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := set.mem_range.mp hx,
refine ⟨{i}, function.const ι (1 : R), by simp, by simp, by simp [hi]⟩, },
{ rintro x ⟨s, w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩ y ⟨s', w', hw₀', hw₁', rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab,
let W : ι → R := λ i, (if i ∈ s then a * w i else 0) + (if i ∈ s' then b * w' i else 0),
have hW₁ : (s ∪ s').sum W = 1,
{ rw [sum_add_distrib, ← sum_subset (subset_union_left s s'),
← sum_subset (subset_union_right s s'), sum_ite_of_true _ _ (λ i hi, hi),
sum_ite_of_true _ _ (λ i hi, hi), ← mul_sum, ← mul_sum, hw₁, hw₁', ← add_mul, hab, mul_one];
intros i hi hi';
simp [hi'], },
refine ⟨s ∪ s', W, _, hW₁, _⟩,
{ rintros i -,
by_cases hi : i ∈ s;
by_cases hi' : i ∈ s';
simp [hi, hi', add_nonneg, mul_nonneg ha (hw₀ i _), mul_nonneg hb (hw₀' i _)], },
{ simp_rw [affine_combination_eq_linear_combination (s ∪ s') v _ hW₁,
affine_combination_eq_linear_combination s v w hw₁,
affine_combination_eq_linear_combination s' v w' hw₁', add_smul, sum_add_distrib],
rw [← sum_subset (subset_union_left s s'), ← sum_subset (subset_union_right s s')],
{ simp only [ite_smul, sum_ite_of_true _ _ (λ i hi, hi), mul_smul, ← smul_sum], },
{ intros i hi hi', simp [hi'], },
{ intros i hi hi', simp [hi'], }, }, },
{ rintros x ⟨s, w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩,
exact affine_combination_mem_convex_hull hw₀ hw₁, },
end
/-- Convex hull of `s` is equal to the set of all centers of masses of `finset`s `t`, `z '' t ⊆ s`.
This version allows finsets in any type in any universe. -/
lemma convex_hull_eq (s : set E) :
convex_hull R s = {x : E | ∃ (ι : Type u') (t : finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : ∑ i in t, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s),
t.center_mass w z = x} :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm (convex_hull_min _ _) _,
{ intros x hx,
use [punit, {punit.star}, λ _, 1, λ _, x, λ _ _, zero_le_one,
finset.sum_singleton, λ _ _, hx],
simp only [finset.center_mass, finset.sum_singleton, inv_one, one_smul] },
{ rintros x ⟨ι, sx, wx, zx, hwx₀, hwx₁, hzx, rfl⟩ y ⟨ι', sy, wy, zy, hwy₀, hwy₁, hzy, rfl⟩
a b ha hb hab,
rw [finset.center_mass_segment' _ _ _ _ _ _ hwx₁ hwy₁ _ _ hab],
refine ⟨_, _, _, _, _, _, _, rfl⟩,
{ rintros i hi,
rw [finset.mem_disj_sum] at hi,
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩|⟨j, hj, rfl⟩;
simp only [sum.elim_inl, sum.elim_inr];
apply_rules [mul_nonneg, hwx₀, hwy₀] },
{ simp [finset.sum_sum_elim, finset.mul_sum.symm, *], },
{ intros i hi,
rw [finset.mem_disj_sum] at hi,
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩|⟨j, hj, rfl⟩; apply_rules [hzx, hzy] } },
{ rintros _ ⟨ι, t, w, z, hw₀, hw₁, hz, rfl⟩,
exact t.center_mass_mem_convex_hull hw₀ (hw₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) hz }
end
lemma finset.convex_hull_eq (s : finset E) :
convex_hull R ↑s = {x : E | ∃ (w : E → R) (hw₀ : ∀ y ∈ s, 0 ≤ w y) (hw₁ : ∑ y in s, w y = 1),
s.center_mass w id = x} :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm (convex_hull_min _ _) _,
{ intros x hx,
rw [finset.mem_coe] at hx,
refine ⟨_, _, _, finset.center_mass_ite_eq _ _ _ hx⟩,
{ intros, split_ifs, exacts [zero_le_one, le_refl 0] },
{ rw [finset.sum_ite_eq, if_pos hx] } },
{ rintro x ⟨wx, hwx₀, hwx₁, rfl⟩ y ⟨wy, hwy₀, hwy₁, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab,
rw [finset.center_mass_segment _ _ _ _ hwx₁ hwy₁ _ _ hab],
refine ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩,
{ rintros i hi,
apply_rules [add_nonneg, mul_nonneg, hwx₀, hwy₀], },
{ simp only [finset.sum_add_distrib, finset.mul_sum.symm, mul_one, *] } },
{ rintros _ ⟨w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩,
exact s.center_mass_mem_convex_hull (λ x hx, hw₀ _ hx)
(hw₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) (λ x hx, hx) }
end
lemma finset.mem_convex_hull {s : finset E} {x : E} :
x ∈ convex_hull R (s : set E) ↔
∃ (w : E → R) (hw₀ : ∀ y ∈ s, 0 ≤ w y) (hw₁ : ∑ y in s, w y = 1), s.center_mass w id = x :=
by rw [finset.convex_hull_eq, set.mem_set_of_eq]
lemma set.finite.convex_hull_eq {s : set E} (hs : s.finite) :
convex_hull R s = {x : E | ∃ (w : E → R) (hw₀ : ∀ y ∈ s, 0 ≤ w y)
(hw₁ : ∑ y in hs.to_finset, w y = 1), hs.to_finset.center_mass w id = x} :=
by simpa only [set.finite.coe_to_finset, set.finite.mem_to_finset, exists_prop]
using hs.to_finset.convex_hull_eq
/-- A weak version of Carathéodory's theorem. -/
lemma convex_hull_eq_union_convex_hull_finite_subsets (s : set E) :
convex_hull R s = ⋃ (t : finset E) (w : ↑t ⊆ s), convex_hull R ↑t :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm _ _,
{ rw convex_hull_eq,
rintros x ⟨ι, t, w, z, hw₀, hw₁, hz, rfl⟩,
simp only [mem_Union],
refine ⟨t.image z, _, _⟩,
{ rw [coe_image, set.image_subset_iff],
exact hz },
{ apply t.center_mass_mem_convex_hull hw₀,
{ simp only [hw₁, zero_lt_one] },
{ exact λ i hi, finset.mem_coe.2 (finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hi) } } },
{ exact Union_subset (λ i, Union_subset convex_hull_mono), },
end
lemma mk_mem_convex_hull_prod {t : set F} {x : E} {y : F} (hx : x ∈ convex_hull R s)
(hy : y ∈ convex_hull R t) :
(x, y) ∈ convex_hull R (s ×ˢ t) :=
begin
rw convex_hull_eq at ⊢ hx hy,
obtain ⟨ι, a, w, S, hw, hw', hS, hSp⟩ := hx,
obtain ⟨κ, b, v, T, hv, hv', hT, hTp⟩ := hy,
have h_sum : ∑ (i : ι × κ) in a ×ˢ b, w i.fst * v i.snd = 1,
{ rw [finset.sum_product, ← hw'],
congr,
ext i,
have : ∑ (y : κ) in b, w i * v y = ∑ (y : κ) in b, v y * w i,
{ congr, ext, simp [mul_comm] },
rw [this, ← finset.sum_mul, hv'],
simp },
refine ⟨ι × κ, a ×ˢ b, λ p, (w p.1) * (v p.2), λ p, (S p.1, T p.2),
λ p hp, _, h_sum, λ p hp, _, _⟩,
{ rw mem_product at hp,
exact mul_nonneg (hw p.1 hp.1) (hv p.2 hp.2) },
{ rw mem_product at hp,
exact ⟨hS p.1 hp.1, hT p.2 hp.2⟩ },
ext,
{ rw [←hSp, finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ hw', finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ h_sum],
simp_rw [prod.fst_sum, prod.smul_mk],
rw finset.sum_product,
congr,
ext i,
have : ∑ (j : κ) in b, (w i * v j) • S i = ∑ (j : κ) in b, v j • w i • S i,
{ congr, ext, rw [mul_smul, smul_comm] },
rw [this, ←finset.sum_smul, hv', one_smul] },
{ rw [←hTp, finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ hv', finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ h_sum],
simp_rw [prod.snd_sum, prod.smul_mk],
rw [finset.sum_product, finset.sum_comm],
congr,
ext j,
simp_rw mul_smul,
rw [←finset.sum_smul, hw', one_smul] }
end
@[simp] lemma convex_hull_prod (s : set E) (t : set F) :
convex_hull R (s ×ˢ t) = convex_hull R s ×ˢ convex_hull R t :=
subset.antisymm (convex_hull_min (prod_mono (subset_convex_hull _ _) $ subset_convex_hull _ _) $
(convex_convex_hull _ _).prod $ convex_convex_hull _ _) $
prod_subset_iff.2 $ λ x hx y, mk_mem_convex_hull_prod hx
lemma convex_hull_add (s t : set E) : convex_hull R (s + t) = convex_hull R s + convex_hull R t :=
by simp_rw [←image2_add, ←image_prod, is_linear_map.is_linear_map_add.convex_hull_image,
convex_hull_prod]
lemma convex_hull_sub (s t : set E) : convex_hull R (s - t) = convex_hull R s - convex_hull R t :=
by simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, convex_hull_add, convex_hull_neg]
/-! ### `std_simplex` -/
variables (ι) [fintype ι] {f : ι → R}
/-- `std_simplex 𝕜 ι` is the convex hull of the canonical basis in `ι → 𝕜`. -/
lemma convex_hull_basis_eq_std_simplex :
convex_hull R (range $ λ(i j:ι), if i = j then (1:R) else 0) = std_simplex R ι :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm (convex_hull_min _ (convex_std_simplex R ι)) _,
{ rintros _ ⟨i, rfl⟩,
exact ite_eq_mem_std_simplex R i },
{ rintros w ⟨hw₀, hw₁⟩,
rw [pi_eq_sum_univ w, ← finset.univ.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hw₁],
exact finset.univ.center_mass_mem_convex_hull (λ i hi, hw₀ i)
(hw₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) (λ i hi, mem_range_self i) }
end
variable {ι}
/-- The convex hull of a finite set is the image of the standard simplex in `s → ℝ`
under the linear map sending each function `w` to `∑ x in s, w x • x`.
Since we have no sums over finite sets, we use sum over `@finset.univ _ hs.fintype`.
The map is defined in terms of operations on `(s → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ` so that later we will not need
to prove that this map is linear. -/
lemma set.finite.convex_hull_eq_image {s : set E} (hs : s.finite) :
convex_hull R s = by haveI := hs.fintype; exact
(⇑(∑ x : s, (@linear_map.proj R s _ (λ i, R) _ _ x).smul_right x.1)) '' (std_simplex R s) :=
begin
rw [← convex_hull_basis_eq_std_simplex, ← linear_map.convex_hull_image, ← set.range_comp, (∘)],
apply congr_arg,
convert subtype.range_coe.symm,
ext x,
simp [linear_map.sum_apply, ite_smul, finset.filter_eq]
end
/-- All values of a function `f ∈ std_simplex 𝕜 ι` belong to `[0, 1]`. -/
lemma mem_Icc_of_mem_std_simplex (hf : f ∈ std_simplex R ι) (x) :
f x ∈ Icc (0 : R) 1 :=
⟨hf.1 x, hf.2 ▸ finset.single_le_sum (λ y hy, hf.1 y) (finset.mem_univ x)⟩
/-- The convex hull of an affine basis is the intersection of the half-spaces defined by the
corresponding barycentric coordinates. -/
lemma affine_basis.convex_hull_eq_nonneg_coord {ι : Type*} (b : affine_basis ι R E) :
convex_hull R (range b) = {x | ∀ i, 0 ≤ b.coord i x} :=
begin
rw convex_hull_range_eq_exists_affine_combination,
ext x,
refine ⟨_, λ hx, _⟩,
{ rintros ⟨s, w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩ i,
by_cases hi : i ∈ s,
{ rw b.coord_apply_combination_of_mem hi hw₁,
exact hw₀ i hi, },
{ rw b.coord_apply_combination_of_not_mem hi hw₁, }, },
{ have hx' : x ∈ affine_span R (range b),
{ rw b.tot, exact affine_subspace.mem_top R E x, },
obtain ⟨s, w, hw₁, rfl⟩ := (mem_affine_span_iff_eq_affine_combination R E).mp hx',
refine ⟨s, w, _, hw₁, rfl⟩,
intros i hi,
specialize hx i,
rw b.coord_apply_combination_of_mem hi hw₁ at hx,
exact hx, },
end
|
ab6a3527001c995bd5c2943677ff8b883ddb7fa9 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/meta/has_reflect.lean | 4cf028b9e8d021639bfbd043e1c5f4c071061f38 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 431 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.expr
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.util
namespace Mathlib
/-- `has_reflect α` lets you produce an `expr` from an instance of α. That is, it is a function from α to expr such that the expr has type α. -/
|
65badd94c5775967181ad649770800df8858abcb | b3fced0f3ff82d577384fe81653e47df68bb2fa1 | /src/algebra/continued_fractions/basic.lean | 82af000f0b5feb988fc95932d7e4a778c27e7313 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ratmice/mathlib | 93b251ef5df08b6fd55074650ff47fdcc41a4c75 | 3a948a6a4cd5968d60e15ed914b1ad2f4423af8d | refs/heads/master | 1,599,240,104,318 | 1,572,981,183,000 | 1,572,981,183,000 | 219,830,178 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,572,980,897,000 | 1,572,980,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,621 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import data.seq.seq
/-!
# Basic Definitions/Theorems for Continued Fractions
## Summary
We define generalised, simple, and regular continued fractions and functions to evaluate their
convergents. We follow the naming conventions from Wikipedia and [wall2018analytic], Chapter 1.
## Main definitions
1. Generalised continued fractions (gcfs)
2. Simple continued fractions (scfs)
3. (Regular) continued fractions ((r)cfs)
4. Computation of convergents using the recurrence relation in `convergents`.
5. Computation of convergents by directly evaluating the fraction described by the gcf in
`convergents'`.
## Implementation notes
1. The most commonly used kind of continued fractions in the literature are regular continued
fractions. We hence just call them `continued_fractions` in the library.
2. We use sequences from `data.seq` to encode potentially infinite sequences.
## References
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalized_continued_fraction
- [Wall, H.S., *Analytic Theory of Continued Fractions*][wall2018analytic]
## Tags
numerics, number theory, approximations, fractions
-/
-- Fix a carrier `α`.
variable (α : Type*)
/-- We collect a partial numerator `aᵢ` and partial denominator `bᵢ` in a pair `⟨aᵢ,bᵢ⟩`. -/
protected structure generalized_continued_fraction.pair := (a : α) (b : α)
/- Interlude: define some expected coercions and instances. -/
namespace generalized_continued_fraction.pair
open generalized_continued_fraction as gcf
/-- Make a gcf.pair printable. -/
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (gcf.pair α) :=
⟨λ p, "(a : " ++ (repr p.a) ++ ", b : " ++ (repr p.b) ++ ")"⟩
section coe
/- Fix another type `β` and assume `α` can be converted to `β`. -/
variables {α} {β : Type*} [has_coe α β]
/-- Coerce a pair by elementwise coercion. -/
instance has_coe_to_generalized_continued_fraction_pair : has_coe (gcf.pair α) (gcf.pair β) :=
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, ⟨(a : β), (b : β)⟩⟩
@[simp, move_cast]
lemma coe_to_generalized_continued_fraction_pair {a b : α} :
(↑(gcf.pair.mk a b) : gcf.pair β) = gcf.pair.mk (a : β) (b : β) :=
rfl
end coe
end generalized_continued_fraction.pair
/--
A *generalised continued fraction* (gcf) is a potentially infinite expression of the form
a₀
h + --------------------------
a₁
b₀ + --------------------
a₂
b₁ + --------------
a₃
b₂ + --------
b₃ + ...
where `h` is called the *head term* or *integer part*, the `aᵢ` are called the
*partial numerators* and the `bᵢ` the *partial denominators* of the gcf.
We store the sequence of partial numerators and denominators in a sequence of
generalized_continued_fraction.pairs `s`.
For convenience, one often writes `[h; (a₀, b₀), (a₁, b₁), (a₂, b₂),...]`.
-/
structure generalized_continued_fraction :=
(h : α) (s : seq $ generalized_continued_fraction.pair α)
variable {α}
namespace generalized_continued_fraction
open generalized_continued_fraction as gcf
/-- Returns the sequence of partial numerators `aᵢ` of `g`. -/
def partial_numerators (g : gcf α) : seq α := g.s.map gcf.pair.a
/-- Returns the sequence of partial denominators `bᵢ` of `g`. -/
def partial_denominators (g : gcf α) : seq α := g.s.map gcf.pair.b
/-- A gcf terminated at position `n` if its sequence terminates at position `n`. -/
def terminated_at (g : gcf α) (n : ℕ) : Prop := g.s.terminated_at n
/-- It is decidable whether a gcf terminated at a given position. -/
instance terminated_at_decidable (g : gcf α) (n : ℕ) : decidable (g.terminated_at n) :=
by { unfold terminated_at, apply_instance }
/-- A gcf terminates if its sequence terminates. -/
def terminates (g : gcf α) : Prop := g.s.terminates
/- Interlude: define some expected coercions. -/
section coe
-- Fix another type `β` and assume `α` can be converted to `β`.
variables {β : Type*} [has_coe α β]
/-- Coerce a sequence by elementwise coercion. -/
def seq.coe_to_seq : has_coe (seq α) (seq β) := ⟨seq.map (λ a, (a : β))⟩
local attribute [instance] seq.coe_to_seq
/-- Coerce a gcf by elementwise coercion. -/
instance has_coe_to_generalized_continued_fraction : has_coe (gcf α) (gcf β) :=
⟨λ ⟨h, s⟩, ⟨(h : β), (s : seq $ gcf.pair β)⟩⟩
@[simp, move_cast]
lemma coe_to_generalized_continued_fraction {g : gcf α} :
(↑(g : gcf α) : gcf β) = ⟨(g.h : β), (g.s : seq $ gcf.pair β)⟩ :=
by { cases g, refl }
end coe
end generalized_continued_fraction
/--
A generalized continued fraction is a *simple continued fraction* if all partial numerators are
equal to one.
1
h + --------------------------
1
b₀ + --------------------
1
b₁ + --------------
1
b₂ + --------
b₃ + ...
-/
def generalized_continued_fraction.is_simple_continued_fraction
(g : generalized_continued_fraction α) [has_one α] : Prop :=
∀ (n : ℕ) (aₙ : α), g.partial_numerators.nth n = some aₙ → aₙ = 1
variable (α)
/--
A *simple continued fraction* (scf) is a generalized continued fraction (gcf) whose partial
numerators are equal to one.
1
h + --------------------------
1
b₀ + --------------------
1
b₁ + --------------
1
b₂ + --------
b₃ + ...
For convenience, one often writes `[h; b₀, b₁, b₂,...]`.
It is encoded as the subtype of gcfs that satisfy
`generalized_continued_fraction.is_simple_continued_fraction`.
-/
def simple_continued_fraction [has_one α] :=
{g : generalized_continued_fraction α // g.is_simple_continued_fraction}
variable {α}
/- Interlude: define some expected coercions. -/
namespace simple_continued_fraction
open generalized_continued_fraction as gcf
open simple_continued_fraction as scf
variable [has_one α]
/-- Lift a scf to a gcf using the inclusion map. -/
instance has_coe_to_generalized_continued_fraction : has_coe (scf α) (gcf α) :=
by {unfold scf, apply_instance}
@[simp, elim_cast]
lemma coe_to_generalized_continued_fraction {s : scf α} : (↑s : gcf α) = s.val := rfl
end simple_continued_fraction
/--
A simple continued fraction is a *(regular) continued fraction* ((r)cf) if all partial denominators
`bᵢ` are positive, i.e. `0 < bᵢ`.
-/
def simple_continued_fraction.is_regular_continued_fraction [has_one α] [has_zero α] [has_lt α]
(s : simple_continued_fraction α) : Prop :=
∀ (n : ℕ) (bₙ : α),
(↑s : generalized_continued_fraction α).partial_denominators.nth n = some bₙ → 0 < bₙ
variable (α)
/--
A *(regular) continued fraction* ((r)cf) is a simple continued fraction (scf) whose partial
denominators are all positive. It is the subtype of scfs that satisfy
`simple_continued_fraction.is_regular_continued_fraction`.
-/
def continued_fraction [has_one α] [has_zero α] [has_lt α] :=
{s : simple_continued_fraction α // s.is_regular_continued_fraction}
variable {α}
/- Interlude: define some expected coercions. -/
namespace continued_fraction
open generalized_continued_fraction as gcf
open simple_continued_fraction as scf
open continued_fraction as cf
variables [has_one α] [has_zero α] [has_lt α]
/-- Lift a cf to a scf using the inclusion map. -/
instance has_coe_to_simple_continued_fraction : has_coe (cf α) (scf α) :=
by {unfold cf, apply_instance}
@[simp, elim_cast]
lemma coe_to_simple_continued_fraction {c : cf α} : (↑c : scf α) = c.val := rfl
/-- Lift a cf to a scf using the inclusion map. -/
instance has_coe_to_generalized_continued_fraction : has_coe (cf α) (gcf α) := ⟨λ c, ↑(↑c : scf α)⟩
@[simp, elim_cast]
lemma coe_to_generalized_continued_fraction {c : cf α} : (↑c : gcf α) = c.val := rfl
end continued_fraction
/-
We now define how to compute the convergents of a gcf. There are two standard ways to do this:
directly evaluating the (infinite) fraction described by the gcf or using a recurrence relation.
For (r)cfs, these computations are equivalent as shown in
`algebra.continued_fractions.convergents_equiv`.
-/
namespace generalized_continued_fraction
open generalized_continued_fraction as gcf
-- Fix a division ring for the computations.
variable [division_ring α]
/-
We start with the definition of the recurrence relation. Given a gcf `g`, for all `n ≥ 1`, we define
`A₋₁ = 1, A₀ = h, Aₙ = bₙ-₁ * Aₙ₋₁ + aₙ-₁ * Aₙ₋₂`, and
`B₋₁ = 0, B₀ = 1, Bₙ = bₙ-₁ * Bₙ₋₁ + aₙ-₁ * Bₙ₋₂`.
`Aₙ, `Bₙ` are called the *nth continuants*, Aₙ the *nth numerator*, and `Bₙ` the
*nth denominator* of `g`. The *nth convergent* of `g` is given by `Aₙ / Bₙ`.
-/
/--
Returns the next numerator `Aₙ = bₙ-₁ * Aₙ₋₁ + aₙ-₁ * Aₙ₋₂`, where `predA` is `Aₙ₋₁`,
`ppredA` is `Aₙ₋₂`, `a` is `aₙ₋₁`, and `b` is `bₙ₋₁`.
-/
def next_numerator (a b ppredA predA : α) : α := b * predA + a * ppredA
/--
Returns the next denominator `Bₙ = bₙ-₁ * Bₙ₋₁ + aₙ-₁ * Bₙ₋₂``, where `predB` is `Bₙ₋₁` and
`ppredB` is `Bₙ₋₂`, `a` is `aₙ₋₁`, and `b` is `bₙ₋₁`.
-/
def next_denominator (aₙ bₙ ppredB predB : α) : α := bₙ * predB + aₙ * ppredB
/--
Returns the next continuants `⟨Aₙ, Bₙ⟩` using `next_numerator` and `next_denominator`, where `pred`
is `⟨Aₙ₋₁, Bₙ₋₁⟩`, `ppred` is `⟨Aₙ₋₂, Bₙ₋₂⟩`, `a` is `aₙ₋₁`, and `b` is `bₙ₋₁`.
-/
def next_continuants (a b : α) (ppred pred : gcf.pair α) : gcf.pair α :=
⟨next_numerator a b ppred.a pred.a, next_denominator a b ppred.b pred.b⟩
/-- Returns the continuants `⟨Aₙ₋₁, Bₙ₋₁⟩` of `g`. -/
def continuants_aux (g : gcf α) : stream (gcf.pair α)
| 0 := ⟨1, 0⟩
| 1 := ⟨g.h, 1⟩
| (n + 2) :=
match g.s.nth n with
| none := continuants_aux (n + 1)
| some gp := next_continuants gp.a gp.b (continuants_aux n) (continuants_aux $ n + 1)
end
/-- Returns the continuants `⟨Aₙ, Bₙ⟩` of `g`. -/
def continuants (g : gcf α) : stream (gcf.pair α) := g.continuants_aux.tail
/-- Returns the numerators `Aₙ` of `g`. -/
def numerators (g : gcf α) : stream α := g.continuants.map gcf.pair.a
/-- Returns the denominators `Bₙ` of `g`. -/
def denominators (g : gcf α) : stream α := g.continuants.map gcf.pair.b
/-- Returns the convergents `Aₙ / Bₙ` of `g`, where `Aₙ, Bₙ` are the nth continuants of `g`. -/
def convergents (g : gcf α) : stream α := λ (n : ℕ), (g.numerators n) / (g.denominators n)
/--
Returns the approximation of the fraction described by the given sequence up to a given position n.
For example, `convergents'_aux [(1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6)] 2 = 1 / (2 + 3 / 4)` and
`convergents'_aux [(1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6)] 0 = 0`.
-/
def convergents'_aux : seq (gcf.pair α) → ℕ → α
| s 0 := 0
| s (n + 1) := match s.head with
| none := 0
| some gp := gp.a / (gp.b + convergents'_aux s.tail n)
end
/--
Returns the convergents of `g` by evaluating the fraction described by `g` up to a given
position `n`. For example, `convergents' [9; (1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6)] 2 = 9 + 1 / (2 + 3 / 4)` and
`convergents' [9; (1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6)] 0 = 9`
-/
def convergents' (g : gcf α) (n : ℕ) : α := g.h + convergents'_aux g.s n
end generalized_continued_fraction
-- Now, some basic, general theorems
namespace generalized_continued_fraction
open generalized_continued_fraction as gcf
/-- Two gcfs `g` and `g'` are equal if and only if their components are equal. -/
protected lemma ext_iff {g g' : gcf α} : g = g' ↔ g.h = g'.h ∧ g.s = g'.s :=
by { cases g, cases g', simp }
@[extensionality]
protected lemma ext {g g' : gcf α} (hyp : g.h = g'.h ∧ g.s = g'.s) : g = g' :=
generalized_continued_fraction.ext_iff.elim_right hyp
end generalized_continued_fraction
|
2b72f1d1414d6358ecdb5f352f610f7e76abbe9b | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/probability_theory/martingale.lean | c961c7dc736b9cfd8412de344606042c025610ee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,357 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import probability_theory.stopping
import probability_theory.notation
/-!
# Martingales
A family of functions `f : ι → α → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if every
`f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. On the other hand, `f : ι → α → E` is said to be a supermartingale
with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with resepct to `ℱ`
and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. Finally, `f : ι → α → E` is said to be a
submartingale with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with
resepct to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`.
The definitions of filtration and adapted can be found in `probability_theory.stopping`.
### Definitions
* `measure_theory.martingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a martingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
* `measure_theory.supermartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a supermartingale with respect to
filtration `ℱ` and measure `μ`.
* `measure_theory.submartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a submartingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
### Results
* `measure_theory.martingale_condexp f ℱ μ`: the sequence `λ i, μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i])` is a
martingale with respect to `ℱ` and `μ`.
-/
open topological_space filter
open_locale nnreal ennreal measure_theory probability_theory big_operators
namespace measure_theory
variables {α E ι : Type*} [preorder ι] [measurable_space E]
{m0 : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α}
[normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E] [borel_space E]
[second_countable_topology E]
{f g : ι → α → E} {ℱ : filtration ι m0} [sigma_finite_filtration μ ℱ]
/-- A family of functions `f : ι → α → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if `f`
is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ.le i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def martingale (f : ι → α → E) (ℱ : filtration ι m0) (μ : measure α)
[sigma_finite_filtration μ ℱ] : Prop :=
adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j | ℱ i, ℱ.le i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → α → E` is a supermartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def supermartingale [has_le E] (f : ι → α → E) (ℱ : filtration ι m0) (μ : measure α)
[sigma_finite_filtration μ ℱ] : Prop :=
adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j | ℱ i, ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, integrable (f i) μ
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → α → E` is a submartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`. -/
def submartingale [has_le E] (f : ι → α → E) (ℱ : filtration ι m0) (μ : measure α)
[sigma_finite_filtration μ ℱ] : Prop :=
adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i, ℱ.le i]) ∧ ∀ i, integrable (f i) μ
variables (E)
lemma martingale_zero (ℱ : filtration ι m0) (μ : measure α) [sigma_finite_filtration μ ℱ] :
martingale (0 : ι → α → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, λ i j hij, by { rw [pi.zero_apply, condexp_zero], simp, }⟩
variables {E}
namespace martingale
@[protected]
lemma adapted (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) : adapted ℱ f := hf.1
@[protected]
lemma measurable (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : measurable[ℱ i] (f i) := hf.adapted i
lemma condexp_ae_eq (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
μ[f j | ℱ i, ℱ.le i] =ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2 i j hij
@[protected]
lemma integrable (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : integrable (f i) μ :=
integrable_condexp.congr (hf.condexp_ae_eq (le_refl i))
lemma set_integral_eq (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : set α}
(hs : measurable_set[ℱ i] s) :
∫ x in s, f i x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f j x ∂μ :=
begin
rw ← @set_integral_condexp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ i) m0 _ (ℱ.le i) _ _ _ (hf.integrable j) hs,
refine set_integral_congr_ae (ℱ.le i s hs) _,
filter_upwards [hf.2 i j hij] with _ heq _ using heq.symm,
end
lemma add (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : martingale g ℱ μ) : martingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.adapted.add hg.adapted, λ i j hij, _⟩,
exact (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).trans
((hf.2 i j hij).add (hg.2 i j hij)),
end
lemma neg (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) : martingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.adapted.neg, λ i j hij, (condexp_neg (f j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).neg)⟩
lemma sub (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : martingale g ℱ μ) : martingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
by { rw sub_eq_add_neg, exact hf.add hg.neg, }
lemma smul (c : ℝ) (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) : martingale (c • f) ℱ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.adapted.smul c, λ i j hij, _⟩,
refine (condexp_smul c (f j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).mono (λ x hx, _)),
rw [pi.smul_apply, hx, pi.smul_apply, pi.smul_apply],
end
lemma supermartingale [preorder E] (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) : supermartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, λ i j hij, (hf.2 i j hij).le, λ i, hf.integrable i⟩
lemma submartingale [preorder E] (hf : martingale f ℱ μ) : submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, λ i j hij, (hf.2 i j hij).symm.le, λ i, hf.integrable i⟩
end martingale
lemma martingale_iff [partial_order E] : martingale f ℱ μ ↔
supermartingale f ℱ μ ∧ submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨λ hf, ⟨hf.supermartingale, hf.submartingale⟩,
λ ⟨hf₁, hf₂⟩, ⟨hf₁.1, λ i j hij, (hf₁.2.1 i j hij).antisymm (hf₂.2.1 i j hij)⟩⟩
lemma martingale_condexp (f : α → E) (ℱ : filtration ι m0) (μ : measure α)
[sigma_finite_filtration μ ℱ] :
martingale (λ i, μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i]) ℱ μ :=
⟨λ i, measurable_condexp, λ i j hij, condexp_condexp_of_le (ℱ.mono hij) _⟩
namespace supermartingale
@[protected]
lemma adapted [has_le E] (hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) : adapted ℱ f := hf.1
@[protected]
lemma measurable [has_le E] (hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : measurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
@[protected]
lemma integrable [has_le E] (hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : integrable (f i) μ := hf.2.2 i
lemma condexp_ae_le [has_le E] (hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
μ[f j | ℱ i, ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
lemma set_integral_le {f : ι → α → ℝ} (hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set[ℱ i] s) :
∫ x in s, f j x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x in s, f i x ∂μ :=
begin
rw ← set_integral_condexp (ℱ.le i) (hf.integrable j) hs,
refine set_integral_mono_ae integrable_condexp.integrable_on (hf.integrable i).integrable_on _,
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ heq using heq,
end
lemma add [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : supermartingale g ℱ μ) : supermartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.1.add hg.1, λ i j hij, _, λ i, (hf.2.2 i).add (hg.2.2 i)⟩,
refine (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).le.trans _,
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij, hg.2.1 i j hij],
intros,
refine add_le_add _ _; assumption,
end
lemma add_martingale [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : martingale g ℱ μ) : supermartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
hf.add hg.supermartingale
lemma neg [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) : submartingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.1.neg, λ i j hij, _, λ i, (hf.2.2 i).neg⟩,
refine eventually_le.trans _ (condexp_neg (f j)).symm.le,
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ _,
simpa,
end
end supermartingale
namespace submartingale
@[protected]
lemma adapted [has_le E] (hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) : adapted ℱ f := hf.1
@[protected]
lemma measurable [has_le E] (hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : measurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
@[protected]
lemma integrable [has_le E] (hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : integrable (f i) μ := hf.2.2 i
lemma ae_le_condexp [has_le E] (hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i, ℱ.le i] :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
lemma add [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : submartingale g ℱ μ) : submartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.1.add hg.1, λ i j hij, _, λ i, (hf.2.2 i).add (hg.2.2 i)⟩,
refine eventually_le.trans _ (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).symm.le,
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij, hg.2.1 i j hij],
intros,
refine add_le_add _ _; assumption,
end
lemma add_martingale [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : martingale g ℱ μ) : submartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
hf.add hg.submartingale
lemma neg [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) : supermartingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.1.neg, λ i j hij, (condexp_neg (f j)).le.trans _, λ i, (hf.2.2 i).neg⟩,
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ _,
simpa,
end
lemma set_integral_le {f : ι → α → ℝ} (hf : submartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set[ℱ i] s) :
∫ x in s, f i x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x in s, f j x ∂μ :=
begin
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← integral_neg, ← integral_neg],
exact supermartingale.set_integral_le hf.neg hij hs,
end
lemma sub_supermartingale [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : supermartingale g ℱ μ) : submartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
by { rw sub_eq_add_neg, exact hf.add hg.neg }
lemma sub_martingale [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : martingale g ℱ μ) : submartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_supermartingale hg.supermartingale
end submartingale
namespace supermartingale
lemma sub_submartingale [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : submartingale g ℱ μ) : supermartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
by { rw sub_eq_add_neg, exact hf.add hg.neg }
lemma sub_martingale [preorder E] [covariant_class E E (+) (≤)]
(hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : martingale g ℱ μ) : supermartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_submartingale hg.submartingale
section
variables {F : Type*} [measurable_space F] [normed_lattice_add_comm_group F]
[normed_space ℝ F] [complete_space F] [borel_space F] [second_countable_topology F]
[ordered_smul ℝ F]
lemma smul_nonneg {f : ι → α → F}
{c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
supermartingale (c • f) ℱ μ :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.1.smul c, λ i j hij, _, λ i, (hf.2.2 i).smul c⟩,
refine (condexp_smul c (f j)).le.trans _,
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ hle,
simp,
exact smul_le_smul_of_nonneg hle hc,
end
lemma smul_nonpos {f : ι → α → F}
{c : ℝ} (hc : c ≤ 0) (hf : supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
submartingale (c • f) ℱ μ :=
begin
rw [← neg_neg c, (by { ext i x, simp } : - -c • f = -(-c • f))],
exact (hf.smul_nonneg $ neg_nonneg.2 hc).neg,
end
end
end supermartingale
namespace submartingale
section
variables {F : Type*} [measurable_space F] [normed_lattice_add_comm_group F]
[normed_space ℝ F] [complete_space F] [borel_space F] [second_countable_topology F]
[ordered_smul ℝ F]
lemma smul_nonneg {f : ι → α → F}
{c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) :
submartingale (c • f) ℱ μ :=
begin
rw [← neg_neg c, (by { ext i x, simp } : - -c • f = -(c • -f))],
exact supermartingale.neg (hf.neg.smul_nonneg hc),
end
lemma smul_nonpos {f : ι → α → F}
{c : ℝ} (hc : c ≤ 0) (hf : submartingale f ℱ μ) :
supermartingale (c • f) ℱ μ :=
begin
rw [← neg_neg c, (by { ext i x, simp } : - -c • f = -(-c • f))],
exact (hf.smul_nonneg $ neg_nonneg.2 hc).neg,
end
end
end submartingale
section nat
variables {𝒢 : filtration ℕ m0} [sigma_finite_filtration μ 𝒢]
namespace submartingale
lemma integrable_stopped_value [has_le E] {f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : submartingale f 𝒢 μ) {τ : α → ℕ}
(hτ : is_stopping_time 𝒢 τ) {N : ℕ} (hbdd : ∀ x, τ x ≤ N) :
integrable (stopped_value f τ) μ :=
integrable_stopped_value hτ hf.integrable hbdd
-- We may generalize the below lemma to functions taking value in a `normed_lattice_add_comm_group`.
-- Similarly, generalize `(super/)submartingale.set_integral_le`.
/-- Given a submartingale `f` and bounded stopping times `τ` and `π` such that `τ ≤ π`, the
expectation of `stopped_value f τ` is less or equal to the expectation of `stopped_value f π`.
This is the forward direction of the optional stopping theorem. -/
lemma expected_stopped_value_mono {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} (hf : submartingale f 𝒢 μ) {τ π : α → ℕ}
(hτ : is_stopping_time 𝒢 τ) (hπ : is_stopping_time 𝒢 π) (hle : τ ≤ π)
{N : ℕ} (hbdd : ∀ x, π x ≤ N) :
μ[stopped_value f τ] ≤ μ[stopped_value f π] :=
begin
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← integral_sub', stopped_value_sub_eq_sum' hle hbdd],
{ simp only [finset.sum_apply],
have : ∀ i, measurable_set[𝒢 i] {x : α | τ x ≤ i ∧ i < π x},
{ intro i,
refine (hτ i).inter _,
convert (hπ i).compl,
ext x,
simpa },
rw integral_finset_sum,
{ refine finset.sum_nonneg (λ i hi, _),
rw [integral_indicator (𝒢.le _ _ (this _)), integral_sub', sub_nonneg],
{ exact hf.set_integral_le (nat.le_succ i) (this _) },
{ exact (hf.integrable _).integrable_on },
{ exact (hf.integrable _).integrable_on } },
intros i hi,
exact integrable.indicator (integrable.sub (hf.integrable _) (hf.integrable _))
(𝒢.le _ _ (this _)) },
{ exact hf.integrable_stopped_value hπ hbdd },
{ exact hf.integrable_stopped_value hτ (λ x, le_trans (hle x) (hbdd x)) }
end
end submartingale
end nat
end measure_theory
|
e68e8fff6d91eee4a1ce6faf34c613a829a4944b | a45212b1526d532e6e83c44ddca6a05795113ddc | /src/topology/metric_space/gromov_hausdorff_realized.lean | 1a543d8337ef9cfc26e191ed5d41ae8fa265026b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/mathlib | b21ab4068db079cbb8590b58fda9cc4bc1f35df4 | b3433a51ea8bc07c4159c1073838fc0ee9b8f227 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,791,089,608 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 165,722,980 | 5 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,552,657,455,000 | 1,547,494,646,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,514 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sébastien Gouëzel
Construction of a good coupling between nonempty compact metric spaces, minimizing
their Hausdorff distance. This construction is instrumental to study the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance between nonempty compact metric spaces -/
import topology.bounded_continuous_function topology.metric_space.gluing
topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.prop_decidable
universes u v w
open classical lattice set function topological_space filter metric quotient
open bounded_continuous_function
open sum (inl inr)
set_option class.instance_max_depth 50
local attribute [instance] metric_space_sum
namespace Gromov_Hausdorff
section Gromov_Hausdorff_realized
/- This section shows that the Gromov-Hausdorff distance
is realized. For this, we consider candidate distances on the disjoint union
α ⊕ β of two compact nonempty metric spaces, almost realizing the Gromov-Hausdorff
distance, and show that they form a compact family by applying Arzela-Ascoli
theorem. The existence of a minimizer follows. -/
section definitions
variables (α : Type u) (β : Type v)
[metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α]
[metric_space β] [compact_space β] [nonempty β]
@[reducible] private def prod_space_fun : Type* := ((α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) → ℝ
@[reducible] private def Cb : Type* := bounded_continuous_function ((α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) ℝ
private def max_var : ℝ := 2 * diam (univ : set α) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set β)
private lemma one_le_max_var : 1 ≤ max_var α β := calc
(1 : real) = 2 * 0 + 1 + 2 * 0 : by simp
... ≤ 2 * diam (univ : set α) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set β) :
by apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left, diam_nonneg, diam_nonneg]; norm_num
/-- The set of functions on α ⊕ β that are candidates distances to realize the
minimum of the Hausdorff distances between α and β in a coupling -/
def candidates : set (prod_space_fun α β) :=
{f | (((((∀x y : α, f (sum.inl x, sum.inl y) = dist x y)
∧ (∀x y : β, f (sum.inr x, sum.inr y) = dist x y))
∧ (∀x y, f (x, y) = f (y, x)))
∧ (∀x y z, f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z)))
∧ (∀x, f (x, x) = 0))
∧ (∀x y, f (x, y) ≤ max_var α β) }
/-- Version of the set of candidates in bounded_continuous_functions, to apply
Arzela-Ascoli -/
private def candidates_b : set (Cb α β) := {f : Cb α β | f.val ∈ candidates α β}
end definitions --section
section constructions
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
[metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α] [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [nonempty β]
{f : prod_space_fun α β} {x y z t : α ⊕ β}
local attribute [instance, priority 0] inhabited_of_nonempty'
private lemma max_var_bound : dist x y ≤ max_var α β := calc
dist x y ≤ diam (univ : set (α ⊕ β)) :
dist_le_diam_of_mem (bounded_of_compact compact_univ) (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)
... = diam (inl '' (univ : set α) ∪ inr '' (univ : set β)) :
by apply congr_arg; ext x y z; cases x; simp [mem_univ, mem_range_self]
... ≤ diam (inl '' (univ : set α)) + dist (inl (default α)) (inr (default β)) + diam (inr '' (univ : set β)) :
diam_union (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)) (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _))
... = diam (univ : set α) + (dist (default α) (default α) + 1 + dist (default β) (default β)) + diam (univ : set β) :
by { rw [isometry.diam_image isometry_on_inl, isometry.diam_image isometry_on_inr], refl }
... = 1 * diam (univ : set α) + 1 + 1 * diam (univ : set β) : by simp
... ≤ 2 * diam (univ : set α) + 1 + 2 * diam (univ : set β) :
begin
apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, diam_nonneg, diam_nonneg, le_refl],
norm_num, norm_num
end
private lemma candidates_symm (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) : f (x, y) = f (y ,x) := fA.1.1.1.2 x y
private lemma candidates_triangle (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) : f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z) :=
fA.1.1.2 x y z
private lemma candidates_refl (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) : f (x, x) = 0 := fA.1.2 x
private lemma candidates_nonneg (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) : 0 ≤ f (x, y) :=
begin
have : 0 ≤ 2 * f (x, y) := calc
0 = f (x, x) : (candidates_refl fA).symm
... ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, x) : candidates_triangle fA
... = f (x, y) + f (x, y) : by rw [candidates_symm fA]
... = 2 * f (x, y) : by ring,
by linarith
end
private lemma candidates_dist_inl (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) (x y: α) : f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y :=
fA.1.1.1.1.1 x y
private lemma candidates_dist_inr (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) (x y : β) : f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y :=
fA.1.1.1.1.2 x y
private lemma candidates_le_max_var (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) : f (x, y) ≤ max_var α β :=
fA.2 x y
/-- candidates are bounded by max_var α β -/
private lemma candidates_dist_bound (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) :
∀ {x y : α ⊕ β}, f (x, y) ≤ max_var α β * dist x y
| (inl x) (inl y) := calc
f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y : candidates_dist_inl fA x y
... = dist (inl x) (inl y) : by { rw @sum.dist_eq α β, refl }
... = 1 * dist (inl x) (inl y) : by simp
... ≤ max_var α β * dist (inl x) (inl y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (one_le_max_var α β) dist_nonneg
| (inl x) (inr y) := calc
f (inl x, inr y) ≤ max_var α β : candidates_le_max_var fA
... = max_var α β * 1 : by simp
... ≤ max_var α β * dist (inl x) (inr y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left sum.one_dist_le (le_trans (zero_le_one) (one_le_max_var α β))
| (inr x) (inl y) := calc
f (inr x, inl y) ≤ max_var α β : candidates_le_max_var fA
... = max_var α β * 1 : by simp
... ≤ max_var α β * dist (inl x) (inr y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left sum.one_dist_le (le_trans (zero_le_one) (one_le_max_var α β))
| (inr x) (inr y) := calc
f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y : candidates_dist_inr fA x y
... = dist (inr x) (inr y) : by { rw @sum.dist_eq α β, refl }
... = 1 * dist (inr x) (inr y) : by simp
... ≤ max_var α β * dist (inr x) (inr y) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (one_le_max_var α β) dist_nonneg
/-- Technical lemma to prove that candidates are Lipschitz -/
private lemma candidates_lipschitz_aux (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) : f (x, y) - f (z, t) ≤ 2 * max_var α β * dist (x, y) (z, t) :=
calc
f (x, y) - f(z, t) ≤ f (x, t) + f (t, y) - f (z, t) : add_le_add_right (candidates_triangle fA) _
... ≤ (f (x, z) + f (z, t) + f(t, y)) - f (z, t) :
add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right (candidates_triangle fA) _ ) _
... = f (x, z) + f (t, y) : by simp
... ≤ max_var α β * dist x z + max_var α β * dist t y :
add_le_add (candidates_dist_bound fA) (candidates_dist_bound fA)
... ≤ max_var α β * max (dist x z) (dist t y) + max_var α β * max (dist x z) (dist t y) :
begin
apply add_le_add,
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_left (dist x z) (dist t y)) (le_trans zero_le_one (one_le_max_var α β)),
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_right (dist x z) (dist t y)) (le_trans zero_le_one (one_le_max_var α β)),
end
... = 2 * max_var α β * max (dist x z) (dist y t) :
by { simp [dist_comm], ring }
... = 2 * max_var α β * dist (x, y) (z, t) : by refl
/-- Candidates are Lipschitz -/
private lemma candidates_lipschitz (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) (p q : (α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) :
dist (f p) (f q) ≤ 2 * max_var α β * dist p q :=
begin
rcases p with ⟨x, y⟩,
rcases q with ⟨z, t⟩,
rw real.dist_eq,
apply abs_le_of_le_of_neg_le,
{ exact candidates_lipschitz_aux fA },
{ have : -(f (x, y) - f (z, t)) = f (z, t) - f (x, y), by ring,
rw [this, dist_comm],
exact candidates_lipschitz_aux fA }
end
/-- candidates give rise to elements of bounded_continuous_functions -/
def candidates_b_of_candidates (f : prod_space_fun α β) (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) : Cb α β :=
bounded_continuous_function.mk_of_compact f (continuous_of_lipschitz (candidates_lipschitz fA))
lemma candidates_b_of_candidates_mem (f : prod_space_fun α β) (fA : f ∈ candidates α β) :
candidates_b_of_candidates f fA ∈ candidates_b α β := fA
/-- The distance on α ⊕ β is a candidate -/
private lemma dist_mem_candidates : (λp : (α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β), dist p.1 p.2) ∈ candidates α β :=
begin
simp only [candidates, dist_comm, forall_const, and_true, add_comm, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self, sum.forall, set.mem_set_of_eq, dist_self],
repeat { split
<|> exact (λa y z, dist_triangle_left _ _ _)
<|> exact (λx y, by refl)
<|> exact (λx y, max_var_bound) }
end
def candidates_b_dist (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [inhabited α]
[metric_space β] [compact_space β] [inhabited β] : Cb α β := candidates_b_of_candidates _ dist_mem_candidates
lemma candidates_b_dist_mem_candidates_b : candidates_b_dist α β ∈ candidates_b α β :=
candidates_b_of_candidates_mem _ _
private lemma candidates_b_ne_empty : candidates_b α β ≠ ∅ :=
ne_empty_of_mem candidates_b_dist_mem_candidates_b
/-- To apply Arzela-Ascoli, we need to check that the set of candidates is closed and equicontinuous.
Equicontinuity follows from the Lipschitz control, we check closedness -/
private lemma closed_candidates_b : is_closed (candidates_b α β) :=
begin
have I1 : ∀x y, is_closed {f : Cb α β | f (inl x, inl y) = dist x y} :=
λx y, is_closed_eq continuous_evalx continuous_const,
have I2 : ∀x y, is_closed {f : Cb α β | f (inr x, inr y) = dist x y } :=
λx y, is_closed_eq continuous_evalx continuous_const,
have I3 : ∀x y, is_closed {f : Cb α β | f (x, y) = f (y, x)} :=
λx y, is_closed_eq continuous_evalx continuous_evalx,
have I4 : ∀x y z, is_closed {f : Cb α β | f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z)} :=
λx y z, is_closed_le continuous_evalx (continuous_add continuous_evalx continuous_evalx),
have I5 : ∀x, is_closed {f : Cb α β | f (x, x) = 0} :=
λx, is_closed_eq continuous_evalx continuous_const,
have I6 : ∀x y, is_closed {f : Cb α β | f (x, y) ≤ max_var α β} :=
λx y, is_closed_le continuous_evalx continuous_const,
have : candidates_b α β = (⋂x y, {f : Cb α β | f ((@inl α β x), (@inl α β y)) = dist x y})
∩ (⋂x y, {f : Cb α β | f ((@inr α β x), (@inr α β y)) = dist x y})
∩ (⋂x y, {f : Cb α β | f (x, y) = f (y, x)})
∩ (⋂x y z, {f : Cb α β | f (x, z) ≤ f (x, y) + f (y, z)})
∩ (⋂x, {f : Cb α β | f (x, x) = 0})
∩ (⋂x y, {f : Cb α β | f (x, y) ≤ max_var α β}) :=
begin ext, unfold candidates_b, unfold candidates, simp [-sum.forall], refl end,
rw this,
repeat { apply is_closed_inter _ _
<|> apply is_closed_Inter _
<|> apply I1 _ _
<|> apply I2 _ _
<|> apply I3 _ _
<|> apply I4 _ _ _
<|> apply I5 _
<|> apply I6 _ _
<|> assume x },
end
/-- Compactness of candidates (in bounded_continuous_functions) follows -/
private lemma compact_candidates_b : compact (candidates_b α β) :=
begin
refine arzela_ascoli₂ (Icc 0 (max_var α β)) compact_Icc (candidates_b α β) closed_candidates_b _ _,
{ rintros f ⟨x1, x2⟩ hf,
simp only [set.mem_Icc],
exact ⟨candidates_nonneg hf, candidates_le_max_var hf⟩ },
{ refine equicontinuous_of_continuity_modulus (λt, 2 * max_var α β * t) _ _ _,
{ have : tendsto (λ (t : ℝ), 2 * max_var α β * t) (nhds 0) (nhds (2 * max_var α β * 0)) :=
tendsto_mul tendsto_const_nhds tendsto_id,
simpa using this },
{ assume x y f hf,
exact candidates_lipschitz hf _ _ } }
end
/-- We will then choose the candidate minimizing the Hausdorff distance. Except that we are not
in a metric space setting, so we need to define our custom version of Hausdorff distance,
called HD, and prove its basic properties. -/
def HD (f : Cb α β) := max (supr (λx:α, infi (λy:β, f (inl x, inr y))))
(supr (λy:β, infi (λx:α, f (inl x, inr y))))
/- We will show that HD is continuous on bounded_continuous_functions, to deduce that its
minimum on the compact set candidates_b is attained. Since it is defined in terms of
infimum and supremum on ℝ, which is only conditionnally complete, we will need all the time
to check that the defining sets are bounded below or above. This is done in the next few
technical lemmas -/
lemma HD_below_aux1 {f : Cb α β} (C : ℝ) {x : α} : bdd_below (range (λ (y : β), f (inl x, inr y) + C)) :=
let ⟨cf, hcf⟩ := (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 bounded_range).1 in
⟨cf + C, forall_range_iff.2 (λi, add_le_add_right ((λx, hcf (f x) (mem_range_self _)) _) _)⟩
private lemma HD_bound_aux1 (f : Cb α β) (C : ℝ) : bdd_above (range (λ (x : α), infi (λy:β, f (inl x, inr y) + C))) :=
begin
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 bounded_range).2 with ⟨Cf, hCf⟩,
refine ⟨Cf + C, forall_range_iff.2 (λx, _)⟩,
calc infi (λy:β, f (inl x, inr y) + C) ≤ f (inl x, inr (default β)) + C :
cinfi_le (HD_below_aux1 C)
... ≤ Cf + C : add_le_add ((λx, hCf (f x) (mem_range_self _)) _) (le_refl _)
end
lemma HD_below_aux2 {f : Cb α β} (C : ℝ) {y : β} : bdd_below (range (λ (x : α), f (inl x, inr y) + C)) :=
let ⟨cf, hcf⟩ := (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 bounded_range).1 in
⟨cf + C, forall_range_iff.2 (λi, add_le_add_right ((λx, hcf (f x) (mem_range_self _)) _) _)⟩
private lemma HD_bound_aux2 (f : Cb α β) (C : ℝ) : bdd_above (range (λ (y : β), infi (λx:α, f (inl x, inr y) + C))) :=
begin
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 bounded_range).2 with ⟨Cf, hCf⟩,
refine ⟨Cf + C, forall_range_iff.2 (λy, _)⟩,
calc infi (λx:α, f (inl x, inr y) + C) ≤ f (inl (default α), inr y) + C :
cinfi_le (HD_below_aux2 C)
... ≤ Cf + C : add_le_add ((λx, hCf (f x) (mem_range_self _)) _) (le_refl _)
end
/-- Explicit bound on HD (dist). This means that when looking for minimizers it will
be sufficient to look for functions with HD(f) bounded by this bound. -/
lemma HD_candidates_b_dist_le : HD (candidates_b_dist α β) ≤ diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β) :=
begin
refine max_le (csupr_le (λx, _)) (csupr_le (λy, _)),
{ have A : infi (λy:β, candidates_b_dist α β (inl x, inr y)) ≤ candidates_b_dist α β (inl x, inr (default β)) :=
cinfi_le (by simpa using HD_below_aux1 0),
have B : dist (inl x) (inr (default β)) ≤ diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β) := calc
dist (inl x) (inr (default β)) = dist x (default α) + 1 + dist (default β) (default β) : rfl
... ≤ diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β) :
begin
apply add_le_add (add_le_add _ (le_refl _)),
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem (bounded_of_compact (compact_univ)) (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _),
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem (bounded_of_compact (compact_univ)) (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)
end,
exact le_trans A B },
{ have A : infi (λx:α, candidates_b_dist α β (inl x, inr y)) ≤ candidates_b_dist α β (inl (default α), inr y) :=
cinfi_le (by simpa using HD_below_aux2 0),
have B : dist (inl (default α)) (inr y) ≤ diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β) := calc
dist (inl (default α)) (inr y) = dist (default α) (default α) + 1 + dist (default β) y : rfl
... ≤ diam (univ : set α) + 1 + diam (univ : set β) :
begin
apply add_le_add (add_le_add _ (le_refl _)),
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem (bounded_of_compact (compact_univ)) (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _),
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem (bounded_of_compact (compact_univ)) (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _)
end,
exact le_trans A B },
end
/- To check that HD is continuous, we check that it is Lipschitz. As HD is a max, we
prove separately inequalities controlling the two terms (relying too heavily on copy-paste...) -/
private lemma HD_lipschitz_aux1 (f g : Cb α β) :
supr (λx:α, infi (λy:β, f (inl x, inr y))) ≤ supr (λx:α, infi (λy:β, g (inl x, inr y))) + dist f g :=
begin
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 bounded_range).1 with ⟨cg, hcg⟩,
have Hcg : ∀x, cg ≤ g x := λx, hcg (g x) (mem_range_self _),
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 bounded_range).1 with ⟨cf, hcf⟩,
have Hcf : ∀x, cf ≤ f x := λx, hcf (f x) (mem_range_self _),
-- prove the inequality but with `dist f g` inside, by using inequalities comparing
-- supr to supr and infi to infi
have Z : supr (λx:α, infi (λy:β, f (inl x, inr y))) ≤ supr (λx:α, infi (λy:β, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g)) :=
csupr_le_csupr (HD_bound_aux1 _ (dist f g))
(λx, cinfi_le_cinfi ⟨cf, forall_range_iff.2(λi, Hcf _)⟩ (λy, coe_le_coe_add_dist)),
-- move the `dist f g` out of the infimum and the supremum, arguing that continuous monotone maps
-- (here the addition of `dist f g`) preserve infimum and supremum
have E1 : ∀x, infi (λy:β, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g =
infi ((λz, z + dist f g) ∘ (λy:β, (g (inl x, inr y)))),
{ assume x,
refine cinfi_of_cinfi_of_monotone_of_continuous (_ : continuous (λ (z : ℝ), z + dist f g)) _ _,
{ exact continuous_add continuous_id continuous_const },
{ assume x y hx, simpa },
{ show bdd_below (range (λ (y : β), g (inl x, inr y))),
from ⟨cg, forall_range_iff.2(λi, Hcg _)⟩ } },
have E2 : supr (λx:α, infi (λy:β, g (inl x, inr y))) + dist f g =
supr ((λz, z + dist f g) ∘ (λx:α, infi (λy:β, g (inl x, inr y)))),
{ refine csupr_of_csupr_of_monotone_of_continuous (_ : continuous (λ (z : ℝ), z + dist f g)) _ _,
{ exact continuous_add continuous_id continuous_const },
{ assume x y hx, simpa },
{ by simpa using HD_bound_aux1 _ 0 } },
-- deduce the result from the above two steps
simp only [add_comm] at Z,
simpa [E2, E1, function.comp]
end
private lemma HD_lipschitz_aux2 (f g : Cb α β) :
supr (λy:β, infi (λx:α, f (inl x, inr y))) ≤ supr (λy:β, infi (λx:α, g (inl x, inr y))) + dist f g :=
begin
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 bounded_range).1 with ⟨cg, hcg⟩,
have Hcg : ∀x, cg ≤ g x := λx, hcg (g x) (mem_range_self _),
rcases (real.bounded_iff_bdd_below_bdd_above.1 bounded_range).1 with ⟨cf, hcf⟩,
have Hcf : ∀x, cf ≤ f x := λx, hcf (f x) (mem_range_self _),
-- prove the inequality but with `dist f g` inside, by using inequalities comparing
-- supr to supr and infi to infi
have Z : supr (λy:β, infi (λx:α, f (inl x, inr y))) ≤ supr (λy:β, infi (λx:α, g (inl x, inr y) + dist f g)) :=
csupr_le_csupr (HD_bound_aux2 _ (dist f g))
(λy, cinfi_le_cinfi ⟨cf, forall_range_iff.2(λi, Hcf _)⟩ (λy, coe_le_coe_add_dist)),
-- move the `dist f g` out of the infimum and the supremum, arguing that continuous monotone maps
-- (here the addition of `dist f g`) preserve infimum and supremum
have E1 : ∀y, infi (λx:α, g (inl x, inr y)) + dist f g =
infi ((λz, z + dist f g) ∘ (λx:α, (g (inl x, inr y)))),
{ assume y,
refine cinfi_of_cinfi_of_monotone_of_continuous (_ : continuous (λ (z : ℝ), z + dist f g)) _ _,
{ exact continuous_add continuous_id continuous_const },
{ assume x y hx, simpa },
{ show bdd_below (range (λx:α, g (inl x, inr y))),
from ⟨cg, forall_range_iff.2(λi, Hcg _)⟩ } },
have E2 : supr (λy:β, infi (λx:α, g (inl x, inr y))) + dist f g =
supr ((λz, z + dist f g) ∘ (λy:β, infi (λx:α, g (inl x, inr y)))),
{ refine csupr_of_csupr_of_monotone_of_continuous (_ : continuous (λ (z : ℝ), z + dist f g)) _ _,
{ exact continuous_add continuous_id continuous_const },
{ assume x y hx, simpa },
{ by simpa using HD_bound_aux2 _ 0 } },
-- deduce the result from the above two steps
simp only [add_comm] at Z,
simpa [E2, E1, function.comp]
end
private lemma HD_lipschitz_aux3 (f g : Cb α β) : HD f ≤ HD g + dist f g :=
max_le (le_trans (HD_lipschitz_aux1 f g) (add_le_add_right (le_max_left _ _) _))
(le_trans (HD_lipschitz_aux2 f g) (add_le_add_right (le_max_right _ _) _))
/-- Conclude that HD, being Lipschitz, is continuous -/
private lemma HD_continuous : continuous (HD : Cb α β → ℝ) :=
uniform_continuous.continuous $ uniform_continuous_of_le_add 1 $
λf g, begin simp, exact HD_lipschitz_aux3 _ _ end
end constructions --section
section consequences
variables (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [metric_space α] [compact_space α] [nonempty α] [metric_space β] [compact_space β] [nonempty β]
/- Now that we have proved that the set of candidates is compact, and that HD is continuous,
we can finally select a candidate minimizing HD. This will be the candidate realizing the
optimal coupling. -/
private lemma exists_minimizer : ∃f ∈ candidates_b α β, ∀g ∈ candidates_b α β, HD f ≤ HD g :=
exists_forall_le_of_compact_of_continuous _ HD_continuous _ compact_candidates_b candidates_b_ne_empty
private definition optimal_GH_dist : Cb α β := classical.some (exists_minimizer α β)
private lemma optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b : optimal_GH_dist α β ∈ candidates_b α β :=
by cases (classical.some_spec (exists_minimizer α β)); assumption
private lemma HD_optimal_GH_dist_le (g : Cb α β) (hg : g ∈ candidates_b α β) : HD (optimal_GH_dist α β) ≤ HD g :=
let ⟨Z1, Z2⟩ := classical.some_spec (exists_minimizer α β) in Z2 g hg
/-- With the optimal candidate, construct a premetric space structure on α ⊕ β, on which the
predistance is given by the candidate. Then, we will identify points at 0 predistance
to obtain a genuine metric space -/
def premetric_optimal_GH_dist : premetric_space (α ⊕ β) :=
{ dist := λp q, optimal_GH_dist α β (p, q),
dist_self := λx, candidates_refl (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b α β),
dist_comm := λx y, candidates_symm (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b α β),
dist_triangle := λx y z, candidates_triangle (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b α β) }
local attribute [instance] premetric_optimal_GH_dist premetric.dist_setoid
/-- A metric space which realizes the optimal coupling between α and β -/
@[reducible] definition optimal_GH_coupling : Type* :=
premetric.metric_quot (α ⊕ β)
instance : metric_space (optimal_GH_coupling α β) := by apply_instance
private lemma optimal_GH_dist.dist_eq (p q : α ⊕ β) : dist ⟦p⟧ ⟦q⟧ = (optimal_GH_dist α β).val (p, q) := rfl
/-- Injection of α in the optimal coupling between α and β -/
def optimal_GH_injl (x : α) : optimal_GH_coupling α β := ⟦inl x⟧
/-- The injection of α in the optimal coupling between α and β is an isometry. -/
lemma isometry_optimal_GH_injl : isometry (optimal_GH_injl α β) :=
begin
refine isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 (λx y, _),
change dist ⟦inl x⟧ ⟦inl y⟧ = dist x y,
rw [optimal_GH_dist.dist_eq α β],
exact candidates_dist_inl (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b α β) _ _,
end
/-- Injection of β in the optimal coupling between α and β -/
def optimal_GH_injr (y : β) : optimal_GH_coupling α β := ⟦inr y⟧
/-- The injection of β in the optimal coupling between α and β is an isometry. -/
lemma isometry_optimal_GH_injr : isometry (optimal_GH_injr α β) :=
begin
refine isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 (λx y, _),
change dist ⟦inr x⟧ ⟦inr y⟧ = dist x y,
rw [optimal_GH_dist.dist_eq α β],
exact candidates_dist_inr (optimal_GH_dist_mem_candidates_b α β) _ _,
end
/-- The optimal coupling between two compact spaces α and β is still a compact space -/
instance compact_space_optimal_GH_coupling : compact_space (optimal_GH_coupling α β) :=
⟨begin
have : (univ : set (optimal_GH_coupling α β)) =
(optimal_GH_injl α β '' univ) ∪ (optimal_GH_injr α β '' univ),
{ refine subset.antisymm (λxc hxc, _) (subset_univ _),
rcases quotient.exists_rep xc with ⟨x, hx⟩,
cases x; rw ← hx,
{ have : ⟦inl x⟧ = optimal_GH_injl α β x := rfl,
rw this,
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)) },
{ have : ⟦inr x⟧ = optimal_GH_injr α β x := rfl,
rw this,
exact mem_union_right _ (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)) } },
rw this,
exact compact_union_of_compact
(compact_image (compact_univ) (isometry_optimal_GH_injl α β).continuous)
(compact_image (compact_univ) (isometry_optimal_GH_injr α β).continuous)
end⟩
/-- For any candidate f, HD(f) is larger than or equal to the Hausdorff distance in the
optimal coupling. This follows from the fact that HD of the optimal candidate is exactly
the Hausdorff distance in the optimal coupling, although we only prove here the inequality
we need. -/
lemma Hausdorff_dist_optimal_le_HD {f} (h : f ∈ candidates_b α β) :
Hausdorff_dist (range (optimal_GH_injl α β)) (range (optimal_GH_injr α β)) ≤ HD f :=
begin
refine le_trans (le_of_forall_le_of_dense (λr hr, _)) (HD_optimal_GH_dist_le α β f h),
have A : ∀ x ∈ range (optimal_GH_injl α β), ∃ y ∈ range (optimal_GH_injr α β), dist x y ≤ r,
{ assume x hx,
rcases mem_range.1 hx with ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw ← hz,
have I1 : supr (λx:α, infi (λy:β, optimal_GH_dist α β (inl x, inr y))) < r :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hr,
have I2 : infi (λy:β, optimal_GH_dist α β (inl z, inr y)) ≤
supr (λx:α, infi (λy:β, optimal_GH_dist α β (inl x, inr y))) :=
le_cSup (by simpa using HD_bound_aux1 _ 0) (mem_range_self _),
have I : infi (λy:β, optimal_GH_dist α β (inl z, inr y)) < r := lt_of_le_of_lt I2 I1,
rcases exists_lt_of_cInf_lt (by simpa) I with ⟨r', r'range, hr'⟩,
rcases mem_range.1 r'range with ⟨z', hz'⟩,
existsi [optimal_GH_injr α β z', mem_range_self _],
have : (optimal_GH_dist α β) (inl z, inr z') ≤ r := begin rw hz', exact le_of_lt hr' end,
exact this },
refine Hausdorff_dist_le_of_mem_dist _ A _,
{ rcases exists_mem_of_nonempty α with ⟨xα, _⟩,
have : optimal_GH_injl α β xα ∈ range (optimal_GH_injl α β) := mem_range_self _,
rcases A _ this with ⟨y, yrange, hy⟩,
exact le_trans dist_nonneg hy },
{ assume y hy,
rcases mem_range.1 hy with ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw ← hz,
have I1 : supr (λy:β, infi (λx:α, optimal_GH_dist α β (inl x, inr y))) < r :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right _ _) hr,
have I2 : infi (λx:α, optimal_GH_dist α β (inl x, inr z)) ≤
supr (λy:β, infi (λx:α, optimal_GH_dist α β (inl x, inr y))) :=
le_cSup (by simpa using HD_bound_aux2 _ 0) (mem_range_self _),
have I : infi (λx:α, optimal_GH_dist α β (inl x, inr z)) < r := lt_of_le_of_lt I2 I1,
rcases exists_lt_of_cInf_lt (by simpa) I with ⟨r', r'range, hr'⟩,
rcases mem_range.1 r'range with ⟨z', hz'⟩,
existsi [optimal_GH_injl α β z', mem_range_self _],
have : (optimal_GH_dist α β) (inl z', inr z) ≤ r := begin rw hz', exact le_of_lt hr' end,
rw dist_comm,
exact this }
end
end consequences
/- We are done with the construction of the optimal coupling -/
end Gromov_Hausdorff_realized
end Gromov_Hausdorff
|
28ce48d2a8c155c33b647cdec3a8cc006d0e6393 | 76df16d6c3760cb415f1294caee997cc4736e09b | /lean/src/sym_factory/lint.lean | 1881aef35b9430e258151404ab755d99f9f232b0 | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | uw-unsat/leanette-popl22-artifact | 70409d9cbd8921d794d27b7992bf1d9a4087e9fe | 80fea2519e61b45a283fbf7903acdf6d5528dbe7 | refs/heads/master | 1,681,592,449,670 | 1,637,037,431,000 | 1,637,037,431,000 | 414,331,908 | 6 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 262 | lean | import .sym_factory
import tactic.find_unused
@[main_declaration]
def dummy := sym_factory.sym_factory
#list_unused_decls ["src/sym_factory/sym_factory.lean", "src/sym_factory/basic.lean", "src/sym_factory/opS.lean", "src/op/basic.lean", "src/basic/sym.lean"]
|
333ce22dfa335c1b8bc827ccd796746b6bd6efc1 | 958488bc7f3c2044206e0358e56d7690b6ae696c | /lean/tactic.lean | d05976361853236c1e5e591989fb7735805af8ad | [] | no_license | possientis/Prog | a08eec1c1b121c2fd6c70a8ae89e2fbef952adb4 | d4b3debc37610a88e0dac3ac5914903604fd1d1f | refs/heads/master | 1,692,263,717,723 | 1,691,757,179,000 | 1,691,757,179,000 | 40,361,602 | 3 | 0 | null | 1,679,896,438,000 | 1,438,953,859,000 | Coq | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,060 | lean | lemma L1 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p → q → p ∧ q ∧ p :=
assume p q hp hq,
begin
apply and.intro,
exact hp,
apply and.intro,
exact hq,
exact hp
end
--#check L1
--#print L1
lemma L2 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p → q → p ∧ q ∧ p :=
assume p q hp hq,
begin
apply and.intro hp,
exact and.intro hq hp
end
--#print L2
lemma L3 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p → q → p ∧ q ∧ p :=
assume p q hp hq,
begin
apply and.intro hp; -- semi-colon is fine too
exact and.intro hq hp
end
lemma L4 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p → q → p ∧ q ∧ p :=
assume p q hp hq,
by exact and.intro hp (and.intro hq hp)
variables {p q : Prop} (hp : p) (hq : q)
include hp hq -- bring those into context needed for proof
example : p ∧ q ∧ p :=
begin
apply and.intro hp,
exact and.intro hq hp
end
omit hp hq -- cancels previous 'include' directive
lemma L5 : ∀ (p q r : Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
assume p q r,
begin
split,
intro H,
cases (and.right H) with Hq Hr,
left,
split,
exact and.left H,
assumption,
right,
split,
exact and.left H,
assumption,
intro H,
cases H with H' H',
split,
exact and.left H',
left,
exact and.right H',
split,
exact and.left H',
right,
cases H',
intros,
assumption
end
--#check L5
lemma L6 : ∀ (α:Type), α → α :=
begin
intro α,
intro x,
exact x
end
--#check L6
lemma L7 : ∀ (α:Type) (x:α), x = x :=
begin
intros α x,
exact eq.refl x
end
--#check L7
lemma L8 : ∀ (m n p : ℕ), m = n → m = p → p = n :=
begin
intros n m p H1 H2,
apply eq.trans,
apply eq.symm,
assumption,
assumption
end
--#check L8
lemma L9 : ∀ (m n p q : ℕ), m = n → n = p → p = q → m = q :=
begin
intros m n p q H1 H2 H3,
apply eq.trans,
assumption,
apply eq.trans; assumption
end
--#check L9
lemma L10 : ∀ (n:ℕ), (λ x:ℕ, 0) 0 = 0 :=
begin
intro n,
refl
end
--#check L10
lemma L11 : ∀ (m n p : ℕ), m = n → m = p → p = n :=
begin
intros n m p H1 H2,
transitivity,
symmetry; assumption,
assumption
end
--#check L11
lemma L12 : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ n :=
begin
intros n,
refl
end
--#check L12
lemma L13 : ∃ (n : ℕ), 5 = n :=
begin
apply exists.intro,
refl
end
--#check L13
lemma L14 : ∃ (n : ℕ), 5 = n :=
begin
fapply exists.intro, -- changes the order of subgoals
exact 5,
refl
end
--#check L14
lemma L15 : 3 = 3 :=
begin
generalize : 3 = x,
revert x,
intro y, reflexivity
end
lemma L16 : 2 + 3 = 5 :=
begin
generalize H : 3 = x,
rw ←H
end
--#check L15
lemma L17 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p ∨ q → q ∨ p :=
begin
intros p q H,
cases H with Hp Hq,
right, assumption,
left, assumption
end
lemma L18 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p ∧ q → q ∧ p :=
begin
intros p q H,
cases H with Hp Hq,
split; assumption
end
lemma L19 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r,
split; intros H,
cases H with Hp Hqr,
cases Hqr with Hq Hr,
left, split; assumption,
right, split; assumption,
cases H with H H,
cases H with Hp Hq,
split,
assumption,
left, assumption,
cases H with Hp Hr,
split,
assumption,
right, assumption
end
--#check L19
lemma L20 : ∀ (p q : ℕ → Prop), (∃ x, p x) → ∃ x, p x ∨ q x :=
begin
intros p q H,
cases H with x H,
constructor,
left, assumption
end
lemma L21 : ∀ (p q : ℕ → Prop), (∃ x, p x) → ∃ x, p x ∨ q x :=
begin
intros p q H, cases H with x H, existsi x, left, assumption
end
--#check L21
universes u v
-- writing function body with tactics
def swap_pair {α:Type u} {β:Type v} : α × β → β × α :=
begin
intros x,
cases x with x y,
split; assumption
end
--#check @swap_pair
def swap_sum {α:Type u} {β:Type v} : α ⊕ β → β ⊕ α :=
begin
intros x,
cases x with x x,
right, assumption,
left, assumption
end
--#check @swap_sum
lemma L22 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p ∧ ¬p → q :=
begin
intros p q H, cases H with H1 H2,
contradiction
end
--#check L22
lemma L23 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) → (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r H,
exact
have Hp : p, from H.left,
have Hqr : q ∨ r, from H.right,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
begin
cases Hqr with Hq Hr,
left, exact
⟨Hp,Hq⟩,
right, exact
⟨Hp,Hr⟩
end
end
--#check L23
lemma L24 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r, split; intros H,
cases H.right with Hq Hr,
left, exact ⟨H.left,Hq⟩,
right, exact ⟨H.left, Hr⟩,
cases H with Hp Hq; split,
exact Hp.left,
left, exact Hp.right,
exact Hq.left,
right,
exact Hq.right
end
--#check L24
-- using show and from tactics
lemma L25 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r, split,
show p ∧ (q ∨ r) → (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r), intros H,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
cases H with Hp Hqr,
cases Hqr with Hq Hr,
left, show p ∧ q, from ⟨Hp, Hq⟩,
right, show p ∧ r, from ⟨Hp, Hr⟩,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) → p ∧ (q ∨ r), intros H,
show p ∧ (q ∨ r),
cases H with Hpq Hpr,
cases Hpq with Hp Hq, split,
show p, assumption,
show q ∨ r, left, assumption,
cases Hpr with Hp Hr, split,
show p, assumption,
show q ∨ r, right, assumption
end
--#check L25
-- use show tactic to select current goal
lemma L26 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p ∧ q → q ∧ p :=
begin
intros p q H, cases H with Hp Hq, split,
show p, assumption,
show q, assumption
end
lemma L27 : ∀ (p q:Prop), p ∧ q → q ∧ p :=
begin
intros p q H, cases H with Hp Hq, split,
show q, assumption,
show p, assumption
end
--#check L26
--#check L27
-- using the have tactic
lemma L28 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) → (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r H, cases H with Hp Hqr, cases Hqr with Hq Hr,
have Hpq : p ∧ q, from ⟨Hp,Hq⟩, left, assumption,
have Hpr : p ∧ r, from ⟨Hp,Hr⟩, right, assumption
end
--#check L28
-- 'have' is for proof what 'let' is for data
lemma L29 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) → (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r H, cases H with Hp Hqr, cases Hqr with Hq Hr,
have Hpq : p ∧ q := ⟨Hp,Hq⟩, left, assumption,
have Hpr : p ∧ r := ⟨Hp,Hr⟩, right, assumption
end
--#check L29
lemma L30 : ∃ (n:ℕ), n + 2 = 8 :=
begin
let n : ℕ := 3 * 2,
existsi n,
reflexivity
end
--#check L30
lemma L31 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r, split,
show p ∧ (q ∨ r) → (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
assume H : p ∧ (q ∨ r), cases H with Hp Hqr,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
begin
cases Hqr with Hq Hr,
left, show p ∧ q, from ⟨Hp,Hq⟩,
right, show p ∧ r, from ⟨Hp, Hr⟩
end,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) → p ∧ (q ∨ r),
assume H : (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
show p ∧ (q ∨ r), cases H with Hpq Hpr,
begin
cases Hpq with Hp Hq, split,
show p, from Hp,
show q ∨ r, left, from Hq
end,
begin
cases Hpr with Hp Hr, split,
show p, from Hp,
show q ∨ r, right, from Hr
end
end
--#check L31
-- curly braces instead of begin .. end
lemma L32 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r, split,
show p ∧ (q ∨ r) → (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
assume H : p ∧ (q ∨ r), cases H with Hp Hqr,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
{ cases Hqr with Hq Hr,
left, show p ∧ q, from ⟨Hp,Hq⟩,
right, show p ∧ r, from ⟨Hp,Hr⟩
},
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) → p ∧ (q ∨ r),
assume H : (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
show p ∧ (q ∨ r), cases H with Hpq Hpr,
{ cases Hpq with Hp Hq, split,
show p, from Hp,
show q ∨ r, left, from Hq
},
{ cases Hpr with Hp Hr, split,
show p, from Hp,
show q ∨ r, right, from Hr
}
end
--#check L32
lemma L33 : ∀ (p q r:Prop), p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intros p q r, split,
{ assume H : p ∧ (q ∨ r), cases H with Hp Hqr,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r), cases Hqr with Hq Hr,
{left, show p ∧ q, from ⟨Hp,Hq⟩},
{right, show p ∧ r, from ⟨Hp,Hr⟩}},
{ assume H : (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
show p ∧ (q ∨ r), cases H with Hpq Hpr,
{cases Hpq with Hp Hq, split,
{show p, from Hp},
{show q ∨ r, left, show q, from Hq}},
{cases Hpr with Hp Hr, split,
{show p, from Hp},
{show q ∨ r, right, show r, from Hr}}}
end
--#check L33
|
409b85a3ff42958d68a5129341f986ba71037a71 | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /stage0/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Apply.lean | 459f5f35ffe66a1a7d99014cd33ccbe5115b1f27 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,910 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Util.FindMVar
import Lean.Meta.SynthInstance
import Lean.Meta.CollectMVars
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Util
namespace Lean.Meta
/-
Compute the number of expected arguments and whether the result type is of the form
(?m ...) where ?m is an unassigned metavariable.
-/
def getExpectedNumArgsAux (e : Expr) : MetaM (Nat × Bool) :=
withDefault <| forallTelescopeReducing e fun xs body =>
pure (xs.size, body.getAppFn.isMVar)
def getExpectedNumArgs (e : Expr) : MetaM Nat := do
let (numArgs, _) ← getExpectedNumArgsAux e
pure numArgs
private def throwApplyError {α} (mvarId : MVarId) (eType : Expr) (targetType : Expr) : MetaM α :=
throwTacticEx `apply mvarId m!"failed to unify{indentExpr eType}\nwith{indentExpr targetType}"
def synthAppInstances (tacticName : Name) (mvarId : MVarId) (newMVars : Array Expr) (binderInfos : Array BinderInfo) : MetaM Unit :=
newMVars.size.forM fun i => do
if binderInfos[i].isInstImplicit then
let mvar := newMVars[i]
let mvarType ← inferType mvar
let mvarVal ← synthInstance mvarType
unless (← isDefEq mvar mvarVal) do
throwTacticEx tacticName mvarId "failed to assign synthesized instance"
def appendParentTag (mvarId : MVarId) (newMVars : Array Expr) (binderInfos : Array BinderInfo) : MetaM Unit := do
let parentTag ← getMVarTag mvarId
if newMVars.size == 1 then
-- if there is only one subgoal, we inherit the parent tag
setMVarTag newMVars[0].mvarId! parentTag
else
unless parentTag.isAnonymous do
newMVars.size.forM fun i => do
let newMVarId := newMVars[i].mvarId!
unless (← isExprMVarAssigned newMVarId) do
unless binderInfos[i].isInstImplicit do
let currTag ← getMVarTag newMVarId
setMVarTag newMVarId (appendTag parentTag currTag)
def postprocessAppMVars (tacticName : Name) (mvarId : MVarId) (newMVars : Array Expr) (binderInfos : Array BinderInfo) : MetaM Unit := do
synthAppInstances tacticName mvarId newMVars binderInfos
-- TODO: default and auto params
appendParentTag mvarId newMVars binderInfos
private def dependsOnOthers (mvar : Expr) (otherMVars : Array Expr) : MetaM Bool :=
otherMVars.anyM fun otherMVar => do
if mvar == otherMVar then
pure false
else
let otherMVarType ← inferType otherMVar
return (otherMVarType.findMVar? fun mvarId => mvarId == mvar.mvarId!).isSome
private def reorderNonDependentFirst (newMVars : Array Expr) : MetaM (List MVarId) := do
let (nonDeps, deps) ← newMVars.foldlM (init := (#[], #[])) fun (nonDeps, deps) mvar => do
let currMVarId := mvar.mvarId!
if (← dependsOnOthers mvar newMVars) then
pure (nonDeps, deps.push currMVarId)
else
pure (nonDeps.push currMVarId, deps)
return nonDeps.toList ++ deps.toList
inductive ApplyNewGoals where
| nonDependentFirst | nonDependentOnly | all
def apply (mvarId : MVarId) (e : Expr) : MetaM (List MVarId) :=
withMVarContext mvarId do
checkNotAssigned mvarId `apply
let targetType ← getMVarType mvarId
let eType ← inferType e
let mut (numArgs, hasMVarHead) ← getExpectedNumArgsAux eType
unless hasMVarHead do
let targetTypeNumArgs ← getExpectedNumArgs targetType
numArgs := numArgs - targetTypeNumArgs
let (newMVars, binderInfos, eType) ← forallMetaTelescopeReducing eType (some numArgs)
unless (← isDefEq eType targetType) do throwApplyError mvarId eType targetType
postprocessAppMVars `apply mvarId newMVars binderInfos
let e ← instantiateMVars e
assignExprMVar mvarId (mkAppN e newMVars)
let newMVars ← newMVars.filterM fun mvar => not <$> isExprMVarAssigned mvar.mvarId!
let otherMVarIds ← getMVarsNoDelayed e
-- TODO: add option `ApplyNewGoals` and implement other orders
let newMVarIds ← reorderNonDependentFirst newMVars
let otherMVarIds := otherMVarIds.filter fun mvarId => !newMVarIds.contains mvarId
let result := newMVarIds ++ otherMVarIds.toList
result.forM headBetaMVarType
return result
def splitAnd (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM (List MVarId) := do
saturate mvarId fun mvarId =>
observing? <| apply mvarId (mkConst ``And.intro)
def applyRefl (mvarId : MVarId) (msg : MessageData := "refl failed") : MetaM Unit :=
withMVarContext mvarId do
let some [] ← observing? do apply mvarId (mkConst ``Eq.refl [← mkFreshLevelMVar])
| throwTacticEx `refl mvarId msg
def exfalso (mvarId : MVarId) (msg : MessageData := "exfalso failed") : MetaM MVarId :=
withMVarContext mvarId do
let some [mvarId] ← observing? do apply mvarId (mkConst ``False.elim [← mkFreshLevelMVar])
| throwTacticEx `exfalso mvarId msg
return mvarId
end Lean.Meta
|
cb27e7cf737955cf8691fbb37d32b9e4ba59cfc1 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/algebra/category/limits/adjoint.hlean | 1e4916d30b9e9f31b76e0e4b93768fbfdaecfa5e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,669 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
colimit_functor ⊣ Δ ⊣ limit_functor
-/
import .colimits ..functor.adjoint
open eq functor category is_trunc prod nat_trans
namespace category
definition limit_functor_adjoint [constructor] (D I : Precategory) [H : has_limits_of_shape D I] :
constant_diagram D I ⊣ limit_functor D I :=
adjoint.mk'
begin
fapply natural_iso.MK,
{ intro dF η, induction dF with d F, esimp at *,
fapply hom_limit,
{ exact natural_map η},
{ intro i j f, exact !naturality ⬝ !id_right}},
{ esimp, intro dF dF' fθ, induction dF with d F, induction dF' with d' F',
induction fθ with f θ, esimp at *, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro η,
apply eq_hom_limit, intro i,
rewrite [assoc, limit_hom_limit_commute,
-assoc, assoc (limit_morphism F i), hom_limit_commute]},
{ esimp, intro dF f, induction dF with d F, esimp at *,
refine !limit_nat_trans ∘n constant_nat_trans I f},
{ esimp, intro dF, induction dF with d F, esimp, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro η,
apply nat_trans_eq, intro i, esimp, apply hom_limit_commute},
{ esimp, intro dF, induction dF with d F, esimp, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro f,
symmetry, apply eq_hom_limit, intro i, reflexivity}
end
/-
definition adjoint_colimit_functor [constructor] (D I : Precategory)
[H : has_colimits_of_shape D I] : colimit_functor D I ⊣ constant_diagram D I :=
have H : colimit_functor D I ⊣ (constant_diagram Dᵒᵖ Iᵒᵖ)ᵒᵖ', from _,
_
-/
end category
|
b3284d711b9896949e904fc60fa823df057d33c2 | 1437b3495ef9020d5413178aa33c0a625f15f15f | /data/list/defs.lean | d4913e87d24187c5476d49b619181e47d965d1db | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jean002/mathlib | c66bbb2d9fdc9c03ae07f869acac7ddbfce67a30 | dc6c38a765799c99c4d9c8d5207d9e6c9e0e2cfd | refs/heads/master | 1,587,027,806,375 | 1,547,306,358,000 | 1,547,306,358,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,684 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
Extra definitions on lists.
-/
import data.option.defs logic.basic
namespace list
open function nat
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
instance [decidable_eq α] : has_sdiff (list α) :=
⟨ list.diff ⟩
/-- Split a list at an index.
split_at 2 [a, b, c] = ([a, b], [c]) -/
def split_at : ℕ → list α → list α × list α
| 0 a := ([], a)
| (succ n) [] := ([], [])
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := let (l, r) := split_at n xs in (x :: l, r)
/-- Concatenate an element at the end of a list.
concat [a, b] c = [a, b, c] -/
@[simp] def concat : list α → α → list α
| [] a := [a]
| (b::l) a := b :: concat l a
@[simp] def head' : list α → option α
| [] := none
| (a :: l) := some a
/-- Convert a list into an array (whose length is the length of `l`). -/
def to_array (l : list α) : array l.length α :=
{data := λ v, l.nth_le v.1 v.2}
/-- "inhabited" `nth` function: returns `default` instead of `none` in the case
that the index is out of bounds. -/
@[simp] def inth [h : inhabited α] (l : list α) (n : nat) : α := (nth l n).iget
/-- Apply a function to the nth tail of `l`. Returns the input without
using `f` if the index is larger than the length of the list.
modify_nth_tail f 2 [a, b, c] = [a, b] ++ f [c] -/
@[simp] def modify_nth_tail (f : list α → list α) : ℕ → list α → list α
| 0 l := f l
| (n+1) [] := []
| (n+1) (a::l) := a :: modify_nth_tail n l
/-- Apply `f` to the head of the list, if it exists. -/
@[simp] def modify_head (f : α → α) : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (a::l) := f a :: l
/-- Apply `f` to the nth element of the list, if it exists. -/
def modify_nth (f : α → α) : ℕ → list α → list α :=
modify_nth_tail (modify_head f)
def insert_nth (n : ℕ) (a : α) : list α → list α := modify_nth_tail (list.cons a) n
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
def take' : ∀ n, list α → list α
| 0 l := []
| (n+1) l := l.head :: take' n l.tail
end take'
/-- Get the longest initial segment of the list whose members all satisfy `p`.
take_while (λ x, x < 3) [0, 2, 5, 1] = [0, 2] -/
def take_while (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (a::l) := if p a then a :: take_while l else []
/-- Fold a function `f` over the list from the left, returning the list
of partial results.
scanl (+) 0 [1, 2, 3] = [0, 1, 3, 6] -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) : α → list β → list α
| a [] := [a]
| a (b::l) := a :: scanl (f a b) l
def scanr_aux (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : list α → β × list β
| [] := (b, [])
| (a::l) := let (b', l') := scanr_aux l in (f a b', b' :: l')
/-- Fold a function `f` over the list from the right, returning the list
of partial results.
scanr (+) 0 [1, 2, 3] = [6, 5, 3, 0] -/
def scanr (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (l : list α) : list β :=
let (b', l') := scanr_aux f b l in b' :: l'
/-- Product of a list.
prod [a, b, c] = ((1 * a) * b) * c -/
def prod [has_mul α] [has_one α] : list α → α := foldl (*) 1
def partition_map (f : α → β ⊕ γ) : list α → list β × list γ
| [] := ([],[])
| (x::xs) :=
match f x with
| (sum.inr r) := prod.map id (cons r) $ partition_map xs
| (sum.inl l) := prod.map (cons l) id $ partition_map xs
end
/-- `find p l` is the first element of `l` satisfying `p`, or `none` if no such
element exists. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → option α
| [] := none
| (a::l) := if p a then some a else find l
def find_indexes_aux (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → nat → list nat
| [] n := []
| (a::l) n := let t := find_indexes_aux l (succ n) in if p a then n :: t else t
/-- `find_indexes p l` is the list of indexes of elements of `l` that satisfy `p`. -/
def find_indexes (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) : list nat :=
find_indexes_aux p l 0
/-- `lookmap` is a combination of `lookup` and `filter_map`.
`lookmap f l` will apply `f : α → option α` to each element of the list,
replacing `a -> b` at the first value `a` in the list such that `f a = some b`. -/
def lookmap (f : α → option α) : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (a::l) :=
match f a with
| some b := b :: l
| none := a :: lookmap l
end
/-- `indexes_of a l` is the list of all indexes of `a` in `l`.
indexes_of a [a, b, a, a] = [0, 2, 3] -/
def indexes_of [decidable_eq α] (a : α) : list α → list nat := find_indexes (eq a)
/-- `countp p l` is the number of elements of `l` that satisfy `p`. -/
def countp (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → nat
| [] := 0
| (x::xs) := if p x then succ (countp xs) else countp xs
/-- `count a l` is the number of occurrences of `a` in `l`. -/
def count [decidable_eq α] (a : α) : list α → nat := countp (eq a)
/-- `is_prefix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <+: l₂`, means that `l₁` is a prefix of `l₂`,
that is, `l₂` has the form `l₁ ++ t` for some `t`. -/
def is_prefix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ t, l₁ ++ t = l₂
/-- `is_suffix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <:+ l₂`, means that `l₁` is a suffix of `l₂`,
that is, `l₂` has the form `t ++ l₁` for some `t`. -/
def is_suffix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ t, t ++ l₁ = l₂
/-- `is_infix l₁ l₂`, or `l₁ <:+: l₂`, means that `l₁` is a contiguous
substring of `l₂`, that is, `l₂` has the form `s ++ l₁ ++ t` for some `s, t`. -/
def is_infix (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ s t, s ++ l₁ ++ t = l₂
infix ` <+: `:50 := is_prefix
infix ` <:+ `:50 := is_suffix
infix ` <:+: `:50 := is_infix
/-- `inits l` is the list of initial segments of `l`.
inits [1, 2, 3] = [[], [1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3]] -/
@[simp] def inits : list α → list (list α)
| [] := [[]]
| (a::l) := [] :: map (λt, a::t) (inits l)
/-- `tails l` is the list of terminal segments of `l`.
tails [1, 2, 3] = [[1, 2, 3], [2, 3], [3], []] -/
@[simp] def tails : list α → list (list α)
| [] := [[]]
| (a::l) := (a::l) :: tails l
def sublists'_aux : list α → (list α → list β) → list (list β) → list (list β)
| [] f r := f [] :: r
| (a::l) f r := sublists'_aux l f (sublists'_aux l (f ∘ cons a) r)
/-- `sublists' l` is the list of all (non-contiguous) sublists of `l`.
It differs from `sublists` only in the order of appearance of the sublists;
`sublists'` uses the first element of the list as the MSB,
`sublists` uses the first element of the list as the LSB.
sublists' [1, 2, 3] = [[], [3], [2], [2, 3], [1], [1, 3], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3]] -/
def sublists' (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists'_aux l id []
def sublists_aux : list α → (list α → list β → list β) → list β
| [] f := []
| (a::l) f := f [a] (sublists_aux l (λys r, f ys (f (a :: ys) r)))
/-- `sublists l` is the list of all (non-contiguous) sublists of `l`; cf. `sublists'`
for a different ordering.
sublists [1, 2, 3] = [[], [1], [2], [1, 2], [3], [1, 3], [2, 3], [1, 2, 3]] -/
def sublists (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
[] :: sublists_aux l cons
def sublists_aux₁ : list α → (list α → list β) → list β
| [] f := []
| (a::l) f := f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λys, f ys ++ f (a :: ys))
section forall₂
variables {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop}
open relator
inductive forall₂ (R : α → β → Prop) : list α → list β → Prop
| nil {} : forall₂ [] []
| cons {a b l₁ l₂} : R a b → forall₂ l₁ l₂ → forall₂ (a::l₁) (b::l₂)
attribute [simp] forall₂.nil
end forall₂
def transpose_aux : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)
| [] ls := ls
| (a::i) [] := [a] :: transpose_aux i []
| (a::i) (l::ls) := (a::l) :: transpose_aux i ls
/-- transpose of a list of lists, treated as a matrix.
transpose [[1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6]] = [[1, 3, 5], [2, 4, 6]] -/
def transpose : list (list α) → list (list α)
| [] := []
| (l::ls) := transpose_aux l (transpose ls)
/-- List of all sections through a list of lists. A section
of `[L₁, L₂, ..., Lₙ]` is a list whose first element comes from
`L₁`, whose second element comes from `L₂`, and so on. -/
def sections : list (list α) → list (list α)
| [] := [[]]
| (l::L) := bind (sections L) $ λ s, map (λ a, a::s) l
section permutations
def permutations_aux2 (t : α) (ts : list α) (r : list β) : list α → (list α → β) → list α × list β
| [] f := (ts, r)
| (y::ys) f := let (us, zs) := permutations_aux2 ys (λx : list α, f (y::x)) in
(y :: us, f (t :: y :: us) :: zs)
private def meas : (Σ'_:list α, list α) → ℕ × ℕ | ⟨l, i⟩ := (length l + length i, length l)
local infix ` ≺ `:50 := inv_image (prod.lex (<) (<)) meas
@[elab_as_eliminator] def permutations_aux.rec {C : list α → list α → Sort v}
(H0 : ∀ is, C [] is)
(H1 : ∀ t ts is, C ts (t::is) → C is [] → C (t::ts) is) : ∀ l₁ l₂, C l₁ l₂
| [] is := H0 is
| (t::ts) is :=
have h1 : ⟨ts, t :: is⟩ ≺ ⟨t :: ts, is⟩, from
show prod.lex _ _ (succ (length ts + length is), length ts) (succ (length ts) + length is, length (t :: ts)),
by rw nat.succ_add; exact prod.lex.right _ _ (lt_succ_self _),
have h2 : ⟨is, []⟩ ≺ ⟨t :: ts, is⟩, from prod.lex.left _ _ _ (lt_add_of_pos_left _ (succ_pos _)),
H1 t ts is (permutations_aux.rec ts (t::is)) (permutations_aux.rec is [])
using_well_founded {
dec_tac := tactic.assumption,
rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨(≺), @inv_image.wf _ _ _ meas (prod.lex_wf lt_wf lt_wf)⟩] }
def permutations_aux : list α → list α → list (list α) :=
@@permutations_aux.rec (λ _ _, list (list α)) (λ is, [])
(λ t ts is IH1 IH2, foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2) IH1 (is :: IH2))
/-- List of all permutations of `l`.
permutations [1, 2, 3] =
[[1, 2, 3], [2, 1, 3], [3, 2, 1],
[2, 3, 1], [3, 1, 2], [1, 3, 2]] -/
def permutations (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
l :: permutations_aux l []
end permutations
def erasep (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (a::l) := if p a then l else a :: erasep l
def extractp (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : list α → option α × list α
| [] := (none, [])
| (a::l) := if p a then (some a, l) else
let (a', l') := extractp l in (a', a :: l')
def revzip (l : list α) : list (α × α) := zip l l.reverse
/-- `product l₁ l₂` is the list of pairs `(a, b)` where `a ∈ l₁` and `b ∈ l₂`.
product [1, 2] [5, 6] = [(1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6)] -/
def product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) : list (α × β) :=
l₁.bind $ λ a, l₂.map $ prod.mk a
/-- `sigma l₁ l₂` is the list of dependent pairs `(a, b)` where `a ∈ l₁` and `b ∈ l₂ a`.
sigma [1, 2] (λ_, [(5 : ℕ), 6]) = [(1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 5), (2, 6)] -/
protected def sigma {σ : α → Type*} (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) : list (Σ a, σ a) :=
l₁.bind $ λ a, (l₂ a).map $ sigma.mk a
def of_fn_aux {n} (f : fin n → α) : ∀ m, m ≤ n → list α → list α
| 0 h l := l
| (succ m) h l := of_fn_aux m (le_of_lt h) (f ⟨m, h⟩ :: l)
def of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) : list α :=
of_fn_aux f n (le_refl _) []
def of_fn_nth_val {n} (f : fin n → α) (i : ℕ) : option α :=
if h : _ then some (f ⟨i, h⟩) else none
/-- `disjoint l₁ l₂` means that `l₁` and `l₂` have no elements in common. -/
def disjoint (l₁ l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → false
section pairwise
variables (R : α → α → Prop)
/-- `pairwise R l` means that all the elements with earlier indexes are
`R`-related to all the elements with later indexes.
pairwise R [1, 2, 3] ↔ R 1 2 ∧ R 1 3 ∧ R 2 3
For example if `R = (≠)` then it asserts `l` has no duplicates,
and if `R = (<)` then it asserts that `l` is (strictly) sorted. -/
inductive pairwise : list α → Prop
| nil {} : pairwise []
| cons : ∀ {a : α} {l : list α}, (∀ a' ∈ l, R a a') → pairwise l → pairwise (a::l)
variables {R}
@[simp] theorem pairwise_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
pairwise R (a::l) ↔ (∀ a' ∈ l, R a a') ∧ pairwise R l :=
⟨λ p, by cases p with a l n p; exact ⟨n, p⟩, λ ⟨n, p⟩, p.cons n⟩
instance decidable_pairwise [decidable_rel R] (l : list α) : decidable (pairwise R l) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [exact is_true pairwise.nil,
exactI decidable_of_iff' _ pairwise_cons]
end pairwise
/-- `pw_filter R l` is a maximal sublist of `l` which is `pairwise R`.
`pw_filter (≠)` is the erase duplicates function (cf. `erase_dup`), and `pw_filter (<)` finds
a maximal increasing subsequence in `l`. For example,
pw_filter (<) [0, 1, 5, 2, 6, 3, 4] = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] -/
def pw_filter (R : α → α → Prop) [decidable_rel R] : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (x :: xs) := let IH := pw_filter xs in if ∀ y ∈ IH, R x y then x :: IH else IH
section chain
variable (R : α → α → Prop)
/-- `chain R a l` means that `R` holds between adjacent elements of `a::l`.
chain R a [b, c, d] ↔ R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c d -/
inductive chain : α → list α → Prop
| nil {} {a : α} : chain a []
| cons : ∀ {a b : α} {l : list α}, R a b → chain b l → chain a (b::l)
/-- `chain' R l` means that `R` holds between adjacent elements of `l`.
chain' R [a, b, c, d] ↔ R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c d -/
def chain' : list α → Prop
| [] := true
| (a :: l) := chain R a l
variable {R}
@[simp] theorem chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a (b::l) ↔ R a b ∧ chain R b l :=
⟨λ p, by cases p with _ a b l n p; exact ⟨n, p⟩, λ ⟨n, p⟩, p.cons n⟩
instance decidable_chain [decidable_rel R] (a : α) (l : list α) : decidable (chain R a l) :=
by induction l generalizing a; simp only [chain.nil, chain_cons]; resetI; apply_instance
instance decidable_chain' [decidable_rel R] (a : α) (l : list α) : decidable (chain' R l) :=
by cases l; dunfold chain'; apply_instance
end chain
/-- `nodup l` means that `l` has no duplicates, that is, any element appears at most
once in the list. It is defined as `pairwise (≠)`. -/
def nodup : list α → Prop := pairwise (≠)
instance nodup_decidable [decidable_eq α] : ∀ l : list α, decidable (nodup l) :=
list.decidable_pairwise
/-- `erase_dup l` removes duplicates from `l` (taking only the first occurrence).
Defined as `pw_filter (≠)`.
erase_dup [1, 0, 2, 2, 1] = [0, 2, 1] -/
def erase_dup [decidable_eq α] : list α → list α := pw_filter (≠)
/-- `range' s n` is the list of numbers `[s, s+1, ..., s+n-1]`.
It is intended mainly for proving properties of `range` and `iota`. -/
@[simp] def range' : ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| s 0 := []
| s (n+1) := s :: range' (s+1) n
def reduce_option {α} : list (option α) → list α :=
list.filter_map id
def map_head {α} (f : α → α) : list α → list α
| [] := []
| (x :: xs) := f x :: xs
def map_last {α} (f : α → α) : list α → list α
| [] := []
| [x] := [f x]
| (x :: xs) := x :: map_last xs
@[simp] def last' {α} : α → list α → α
| a [] := a
| a (b::l) := last' b l
/- tfae: The Following (propositions) Are Equivalent -/
def tfae (l : list Prop) : Prop := ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, x ↔ y
/-- `rotate l n` rotates the elements of `l` to the left by `n`
rotate [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 2 = [2, 3, 4, 5, 0, 1] -/
def rotate (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : list α :=
let (l₁, l₂) := list.split_at (n % l.length) l in l₂ ++ l₁
/-- rotate' is the same as `rotate`, but slower. Used for proofs about `rotate`-/
def rotate' : list α → ℕ → list α
| [] n := []
| l 0 := l
| (a::l) (n+1) := rotate' (l ++ [a]) n
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
def choose_x : Π l : list α, Π hp : (∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a), { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a }
| [] hp := false.elim (exists.elim hp (assume a h, not_mem_nil a h.left))
| (l :: ls) hp := if pl : p l then ⟨l, ⟨or.inl rfl, pl⟩⟩ else
let ⟨a, ⟨a_mem_ls, pa⟩⟩ := choose_x ls (hp.imp
(λ b ⟨o, h₂⟩, ⟨o.resolve_left (λ e, pl $ e ▸ h₂), h₂⟩)) in
⟨a, ⟨or.inr a_mem_ls, pa⟩⟩
def choose (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α := choose_x p l hp
end choose
end list
|
7c89aecd59d5190a98ef0b549c0ef7f868297900 | 3618c6e11aa822fd542440674dfb9a7b9921dba0 | /scratch/exp_sum_eq_zero.lean | f2cfa12fdd44801ba855d9b9d9de147ba8f2878c | [] | no_license | ChrisHughes24/single_relation | 99ceedcc02d236ce46d6c65d72caa669857533c5 | 057e157a59de6d0e43b50fcb537d66792ec20450 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,652,062,698 | 1,683,360,089,000 | 1,683,360,089,000 | 279,346,432 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,147 | lean | import .HNN_normalize
open free_group multiplicative P semidirect_product
variables {ι : Type} [decidable_eq ι] (T : set ι) [decidable_pred T]
@[inline] meta def exp_sum_eq_zero (t x : ι)
(hs : Π (r : free_group (ι × C∞)) (T : set (ι × C∞)) [decidable_pred T], solver r T)
(cyc_r : free_group ι) :
solver cyc_r T := λ w,
let (c₂, conj_r) := cyclically_conjugate x cyc_r in
let r' := (add_subscript t conj_r).left in
let (a, b) := min_max_subscript x r' in
do (p, n) ← HNN_normalize t x r' a b hs w,
if t ∈ T
then let T' : set (ι × C∞) := { i : ι × C∞ | i.1 ∈ T } in
do np ← hs r' T' p.right,
return (change_r c₂
(inr (of' t n) * P.map (remove_subscript t) undefined (P.trans p np)))
-- (P.map (remove_subscript t) sorry (P.trans p np))
-- inr (of' t n))
-- case t ∉ T
else
-- Kind of silly. Could check if n = 1 before normalization.
if n ≠ 1 then none
else let T' : set (ι × C∞) := { i : ι × C∞ | i.1 ∈ T ∧ i.2 = 1 } in
do np ← hs r' T' p.right,
return (change_r c₂ (P.map (remove_subscript t) undefined (P.trans p np))) |
2aaea774546139882c75c5e3bebbb49483672130 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/topology/instances/nnreal.lean | 7550dd96e1e697c01953bda75e9012a8f9984b85 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,594 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
Nonnegative real numbers.
-/
import topology.algebra.infinite_sum
import topology.algebra.group_with_zero
noncomputable theory
open set topological_space metric
open_locale topological_space
namespace nnreal
open_locale nnreal
instance : topological_space ℝ≥0 := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance : topological_semiring ℝ≥0 :=
{ continuous_mul := continuous_subtype_mk _ $
(continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_snd),
continuous_add := continuous_subtype_mk _ $
(continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_fst).add (continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_snd) }
instance : second_countable_topology ℝ≥0 :=
topological_space.subtype.second_countable_topology _ _
instance : order_topology ℝ≥0 := @order_topology_of_ord_connected _ _ _ _ (Ici 0) _
section coe
variable {α : Type*}
open filter finset
lemma continuous_of_real : continuous nnreal.of_real :=
continuous_subtype_mk _ $ continuous_id.max continuous_const
lemma continuous_coe : continuous (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) :=
continuous_subtype_val
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma tendsto_coe {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ≥0} :
tendsto (λa, (m a : ℝ)) f (𝓝 (x : ℝ)) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_subtype_rng.symm
lemma tendsto_coe' {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {m : α → ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} :
tendsto (λ a, m a : α → ℝ) f (𝓝 x) ↔ ∃ hx : 0 ≤ x, tendsto m f (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨ge_of_tendsto' h (λ c, (m c).2), tendsto_coe.1 h⟩, λ ⟨hx, hm⟩, tendsto_coe.2 hm⟩
@[simp] lemma map_coe_at_top : map (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) at_top = at_top :=
map_at_top_eq_of_gc nnreal.of_real 0 nnreal.coe_mono
(λ a b hb, (le_of_real_iff_coe_le hb).symm)
(λ b hb, le_coe_of_real b)
lemma comap_coe_at_top : comap (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) at_top = at_top :=
by rw [← map_coe_at_top, comap_map nnreal.injective_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma tendsto_coe_at_top {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} :
tendsto (λ a, (m a : ℝ)) f at_top ↔ tendsto m f at_top :=
by rw [← comap_coe_at_top, tendsto_comap_iff]
lemma tendsto_of_real {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (h : tendsto m f (𝓝 x)) :
tendsto (λa, nnreal.of_real (m a)) f (𝓝 (nnreal.of_real x)) :=
tendsto.comp (continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 continuous_of_real _) h
instance : has_continuous_sub ℝ≥0 :=
⟨continuous_subtype_mk _ $
((continuous_coe.comp continuous_fst).sub
(continuous_coe.comp continuous_snd)).max continuous_const⟩
instance : has_continuous_inv' ℝ≥0 :=
⟨λ x hx, tendsto_coe.1 $ (real.tendsto_inv $ nnreal.coe_ne_zero.2 hx).comp
continuous_coe.continuous_at⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma has_sum_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
has_sum (λa, (f a : ℝ)) (r : ℝ) ↔ has_sum f r :=
by simp only [has_sum, coe_sum.symm, tendsto_coe]
@[norm_cast] lemma summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} : summable (λa, (f a : ℝ)) ↔ summable f :=
begin
split,
exact assume ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨⟨a, has_sum_le (λa, (f a).2) has_sum_zero ha⟩, has_sum_coe.1 ha⟩,
exact assume ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨a.1, has_sum_coe.2 ha⟩
end
open_locale classical big_operators
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑(∑'a, f a) = (∑'a, (f a : ℝ)) :=
if hf : summable f
then (eq.symm $ (has_sum_coe.2 $ hf.has_sum).tsum_eq)
else by simp [tsum, hf, mt summable_coe.1 hf]
lemma summable_comp_injective {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : summable f)
{i : β → α} (hi : function.injective i) :
summable (f ∘ i) :=
nnreal.summable_coe.1 $
show summable ((coe ∘ f) ∘ i), from (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hf).comp_injective hi
lemma summable_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0) (hf : summable f) (k : ℕ) : summable (λ i, f (i + k)) :=
summable_comp_injective hf $ add_left_injective k
lemma sum_add_tsum_nat_add {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} (k : ℕ) (hf : summable f) :
(∑' i, f i) = (∑ i in range k, f i) + ∑' i, f (i + k) :=
by rw [←nnreal.coe_eq, coe_tsum, nnreal.coe_add, coe_sum, coe_tsum,
sum_add_tsum_nat_add k (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hf)]
lemma infi_real_pos_eq_infi_nnreal_pos [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ → α} :
(⨅ (n : ℝ) (h : 0 < n), f n) = (⨅ (n : ℝ≥0) (h : 0 < n), f n) :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume r, ⟨r, infi_le_infi $ assume hr, le_rfl⟩)
(le_infi $ assume r, le_infi $ assume hr, infi_le_of_le ⟨r, hr.le⟩ $ infi_le _ hr)
end coe
end nnreal
|
1b114a6b5571e7c54e3ebeb4577b8c7a0974f118 | 3329d41fdd05b3ee531c3707848a9e6de76b1298 | /graph.lean | 9aef2ba52bb9e15d765de7ec8eaf918f5bb76315 | [] | no_license | Junkyards3/lean_graphs | 3d13fa8c069b2818dbd0241728b73a809127fa28 | 5e90348e6bed3aff69969e7b3ff84e5be59708af | refs/heads/main | 1,691,119,928,361 | 1,632,939,927,000 | 1,632,939,927,000 | 411,786,336 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,866 | lean | import tactic
import data.nat.parity
import data.sym.sym2
import data.multiset.basic
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import aux_walk
open finset
open function
open sym2
open list
open aux_walk
open_locale big_operators
structure graph :=
(V : Type)
(E : Type)
(edge : E → (sym2 V))
structure finite_graph extends graph :=
(dec_V : decidable_eq V)
(dec_E : decidable_eq E)
(fin_V : fintype V)
(fin_E : fintype E)
section graph
variables {G : graph}
def graph.simple (G : graph) : Prop :=
injective G.edge ∧ ∀ e : G.E, ¬ is_diag (G.edge e)
def graph.simple_graph_from_edgeset {W : Type} (S : set (sym2 W)) : graph :=
{
V := W,
E := S,
edge := λe,↑e
}
def graph.incid (G : graph) (v w : G.V) : Prop := ∃ e : G.E, G.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧
theorem graph.exists_unique_edge_simple_graph (G : graph) {h : G.simple} {v w : G.V} :
G.incid v w → ∃! (e:G.E), G.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧ :=
begin
intro hvw,
unfold exists_unique,
cases hvw with e he,
use e,
split,
exact he,
intros e' he',
apply h.1,
exact (rfl.congr (eq.symm he)).mp he',
end
def graph.isolated_vertex (G : graph) (v : G.V) : Prop := ∀ e : G.E, v ∉ G.edge e
theorem graph.isolated_def (G : graph) (v : G.V) : G.isolated_vertex v ↔ ∀ e : G.E, v ∉ G.edge e := by refl
section finite_graph
variable {F : finite_graph}
instance : fintype F.V := begin
exact F.fin_V,
end
instance : fintype F.E := begin
exact F.fin_E,
end
instance : decidable_eq F.V := begin
exact F.dec_V,
end
instance : decidable_eq F.E := begin
exact F.dec_E,
end
instance finite_graph.get_graph : has_coe (finite_graph) (graph) := begin
fconstructor,
exact finite_graph.to_graph,
end
def finite_graph.simple (F : finite_graph) : Prop := F.to_graph.simple
instance {V : Type} [fintype V] [decidable_eq V] : fintype (sym2 V) :=
begin
exact quotient.fintype (sym2.rel.setoid V),
end
def finite_graph.degree (F : finite_graph) (v : F.V) : ℕ :=
card (filter (λe:F.E,v ∈ F.edge e) univ) + card (filter (λe:F.E,F.edge e = ⟦(v,v)⟧) univ)
lemma finite_graph.degree_def (F : finite_graph) : ∀ v : F.V,
F.degree v = card (filter (λe:F.E,v ∈ F.edge e) univ) +
card (filter (λe:F.E,F.edge e = ⟦(v,v)⟧) univ) := by finish
lemma finite_graph.degree_separate (F : finite_graph) : (λv,F.degree v) = λv:F.V,
card (filter (λe:F.E,v ∈ F.edge e ∧ F.edge e ≠ ⟦(v,v)⟧) univ) +
2*card (filter (λe:F.E,F.edge e = ⟦(v,v)⟧) univ) :=
begin
funext,
rw two_mul,
rw F.degree_def v,
simp, rw ← add_assoc,
congr' 1,
rw ← card_disjoint_union,swap,
{
rw disjoint_filter,
simp,
},
{
rw ← filter_or,
congr,
funext,
simp,
split,
intros hv,
finish,
intros hv,
finish,
}
end
instance : decidable_pred (odd ∘ F.degree) :=
begin
intro v,
apply nat.decidable_pred_odd,
end
theorem finite_graph.even_sum_of_degrees (F : finite_graph) : even (∑ v : F.V, F.degree v) :=
begin
rw F.degree_separate,
norm_num,
rw sum_add_distrib,
apply nat.even.add_even,swap,
{
apply finset.sum_induction,
intros a b ha hb, exact nat.even.add_even ha hb, exact nat.even_zero,
simp, intros v, rw even_iff_two_dvd, simp,
},
{
have hn : ∑ (x : F.V), (filter (λ (e : F.E), x ∈ F.edge e ∧ ¬F.edge e = ⟦(x, x)⟧) univ).card =
(∑ (x : F.V), ∑ (e : F.E), ite (x ∈ F.edge e ∧ ¬F.edge e = ⟦(x,x)⟧) 1 0),
{
congr,
funext v,
finish,
},
rw hn,
rw sum_comm,
apply finset.sum_induction,
intros a b ha hb, exact nat.even.add_even ha hb, exact nat.even_zero,
intros e he, clear he,
have he_rep := quotient.exists_rep (F.edge e),
rcases he_rep with ⟨⟨v,w⟩,hvw⟩,
rw ← hvw,
simp [-quotient.eq],
have hf : filter (λ (x : F.V), (x = v ∨ x = w) ∧ ¬⟦(v, w)⟧ = ⟦(x, x)⟧) univ = ite (v = w) ∅ {v,w},
{
ext u,
simp [-quotient.eq],
split,
rintros ⟨h1|h1,h2⟩,
rw h1 at h2 ⊢,
split_ifs,exfalso,rw ← h at h2, contradiction,
simp [-quotient.eq],
split_ifs,
exfalso,
rw [h,h1] at h2, contradiction,
rw h1, simp [-quotient.eq],
intro hu, split_ifs at hu,
exfalso, finish,
simp [-quotient.eq] at hu,
split;
cases hu with huv huw,
left, assumption,
right, assumption,
rw huv, intro hs, apply h,
rw eq_iff at hs,
simp at hs, symmetry, assumption,
rw eq_iff,
simp,
intro hvu, finish,
},
rw hf,
split_ifs,
simp,
rw card_insert_of_not_mem,
rw finset.card_singleton, ring_nf, exact even_bit0 1,
simp, exact h,
}
end
lemma finite_graph.parity_sum_of_odd_terms {S : Type} [decidable_eq S] {A : finset S} (f : S → ℕ) :
(∀ a ∈ A, odd (f a)) →
(even (∑ a in A, f a) ↔ even A.card) :=
begin
apply finset.induction_on A,
{
intros he,
split,
intros he',
simp,
intros he',
simp,
},
{
intros a S haS hS hA,
have hS' : even (∑ a in S, f a) ↔ even S.card,
{
apply hS,
intros a ha,
apply hA,
finish,
},
rw card_insert_of_not_mem haS,
rw sum_insert haS,
repeat {rw nat.even_add'},
specialize hA a (by simp),
simp [hA],
rwa hS',
}
end
theorem finite_graph.even_number_of_odd_degrees (F : finite_graph) : even (card (filter (odd ∘ F.degree) univ)) :=
begin
have h : even (∑ v in filter (odd ∘ F.degree) univ, F.degree v),
{
have heo := sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not univ (odd ∘ F.degree) F.degree,
have hcc := F.even_sum_of_degrees,
rw ← heo at hcc,
rw nat.even_add at hcc,
rw hcc,
apply finset.sum_induction,
intros a b, exact nat.even.add_even,
exact nat.even_zero,
intros v hv,
finish,
},
rw finite_graph.parity_sum_of_odd_terms at h,
exact h,
simp,
end
def finite_graph.isolated_vertex (F : finite_graph) (v : F.V) : Prop := ∀ e : F.E, v ∉ F.edge e
theorem finite_graph.isolated_def (F : finite_graph) (v : F.V) :
F.isolated_vertex v ↔ ∀ e : F.E, v ∉ F.edge e := by refl
theorem finite_graph.isolated_degree_zero (F : finite_graph) (v : F.V) :
F.isolated_vertex v ↔ F.degree v = 0 :=
begin
rw F.isolated_def,
split,
{
intro h,
rw F.degree_def,
norm_num,
split,
apply filter_false_of_mem,
simp, exact h,
apply filter_false_of_mem,
simp, intros e hne, specialize h e, finish,
},
{
intros hv e hn,
rw F.degree_def at hv, norm_num at hv,
cases hv with hv1 hv2,
rw ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty at hv1,
apply hv1,
use e,
rw finset.mem_filter,
exact ⟨mem_univ e,hn⟩,
}
end
def finite_graph.null_graph (F : finite_graph) : Prop := ∀ v : F.V, F.isolated_vertex v
theorem finite_graph.null_def (F : finite_graph) : F.null_graph ↔ ∀ v : F.V, F.isolated_vertex v:= by refl
theorem finite_graph.null_only_isolated_vertices (F : finite_graph) : F.null_graph → is_empty F.E :=
begin
intro p,
rw is_empty_iff,
intro e,
rw F.null_def at p,
have he : ∃ v w : F.V, F.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧,
{
induction F.edge e,
use [a.fst,a.snd],
simp,
refl,
refl,
},
rcases he with ⟨v,w,hvw⟩,
specialize p v e,
finish,
end
end finite_graph
section morphism
variables {F : finite_graph} {K : finite_graph} {H : finite_graph}
structure finite_graph.morphism (F : finite_graph) (G : finite_graph) :=
(aᵥ : F.V → G.V)
(aₑ : F.E → G.E)
(commute : G.edge ∘ aₑ = map (aᵥ) ∘ F.edge)
def finite_graph.id (F : finite_graph) : F.morphism F :=
{
aᵥ := id,
aₑ := id,
commute := by rw [sym2.map_id, comp.right_id,comp.left_id],
}
def finite_graph.comp (g : K.morphism H) (f : F.morphism K) : F.morphism H :=
{
aᵥ := g.aᵥ ∘ f.aᵥ,
aₑ:= g.aₑ ∘ f.aₑ
,
commute :=
begin
rw ← comp.assoc,
rw g.commute,
rw comp.assoc,
rw f.commute,
rw ← comp.assoc,
rw ← map_comp,
end
}
infixr ` ∘ `: 90 := finite_graph.comp
structure finite_graph.equiv (F : finite_graph) (H : finite_graph) :=
(to_fun : F.morphism H)
(inv_fun : H.morphism F)
(left_inv : to_fun ∘ inv_fun = H.id)
(right_inv : inv_fun ∘ to_fun = F.id)
infixr ` ≃ `: 50 := finite_graph.equiv
theorem finite_graph.isom_graphs_same_number_of_vertices (bij : F ≃ H) :
fintype.card F.V = fintype.card H.V :=
begin
rw fintype.card_eq,
constructor,
constructor,
have hn := bij.right_inv,
unfold finite_graph.comp finite_graph.id at hn,
injections_and_clear,
swap 3,
apply bij.to_fun.aᵥ,
swap 3,
apply bij.inv_fun.aᵥ,
intro x,
rw ← comp_app bij.inv_fun.aᵥ,
rw h_1,exact id.def x,
have hn := bij.left_inv,
unfold finite_graph.comp finite_graph.id at hn,
injections_and_clear,
intro x,
rw ← comp_app bij.to_fun.aᵥ,
rw h_1,exact id.def x,
end
theorem finite_graph.isom_graphs_same_number_of_edges (bij : F ≃ H) :
fintype.card F.E = fintype.card H.E :=
begin
rw fintype.card_eq,
constructor,
constructor,
have hn := bij.right_inv,
unfold finite_graph.comp finite_graph.id at hn,
injections_and_clear,
swap 3,
apply bij.to_fun.aₑ,
swap 3,
apply bij.inv_fun.aₑ,
intro x,
rw ← comp_app bij.inv_fun.aₑ,
rw h_2,exact id.def x,
have hn := bij.left_inv,
unfold finite_graph.comp finite_graph.id at hn,
injections_and_clear,
intro x,
rw ← comp_app bij.to_fun.aₑ,
rw h_2,exact id.def x,
end
end morphism
section subgraph
variables {F : finite_graph}
structure finite_graph.subgraph (F : finite_graph) :=
(sub_vertices : finset F.V)
(sub_edges : finset F.E)
(same_vertices : ∀ e ∈ sub_edges, ∀ v ∈ F.edge e, v ∈ sub_vertices)
instance lift_sym2 {H : finite_graph} {h : H.subgraph} : has_lift (sym2 h.sub_vertices) (sym2 H.V) :=
begin
constructor,
intro pa,
induction pa with p p1 p2 hp,
apply quot.mk,
exact ⟨p.fst,p.snd⟩,
simp,
apply quot.sound,
cases p2 with a2 b2, cases p1 with a1 b1,
simp,
cases hp,
constructor,
constructor,
end
instance finite_graph.sb_to_graph : has_lift (F.subgraph) (finite_graph) :=
begin
constructor,
intro H,
split, swap 5,
{
split, swap,
exact H.sub_vertices, swap,
exact H.sub_edges,
intro e,
apply fintype.choose (λp : sym2 (H.sub_vertices),↑p = F.edge e),
have he := H.same_vertices e.1 e.2,
revert he,
induction (F.edge ↑e) with pv pv1 pv2 hpv,
induction pv with v1 v2,
swap,
refine congr_fun rfl,
intros v1 v2 h,
have h1 := h v1 (mk_has_mem v1 v2),
have h2 := h v2 (mk_has_mem_right v1 v2),
apply exists_unique.intro,
swap 3,
exact ⟦(⟨v1,h1⟩,⟨v2,h2⟩)⟧,
solve_by_elim,
clear e h,
intros p hp,
induction p with pr,
induction pr with a b,
apply eq_iff.2,
have hpp := eq_iff.1 hp,
simp at hpp,
finish,
exact rfl,
},
all_goals {simp},
any_goals {apply subtype.fintype},
any_goals {apply subtype.decidable_eq},
end
def finite_graph.top_subgraph (F : finite_graph) : F.subgraph :=
{
sub_vertices := univ,
sub_edges := univ,
same_vertices :=
begin
intros e he v hve,
exact mem_univ v,
end
}
end subgraph
section walk
variables {F : finite_graph}
def finite_graph.incid (F : finite_graph) (v w : F.V) : Prop := ∃ e : F.E, F.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧
theorem finite_graph.incid_def (F : finite_graph) (v w : F.V) :
F.incid v w ↔ ∃ e : F.E, F.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧ := by refl
def finite_graph.get_edge_from_incid (F : finite_graph) {v w : F.V} {hf : F.simple} :
(F.incid v w) → F.E :=
begin
intro h,
rw F.incid_def at h,
apply fintype.choose (λ e,F.to_graph.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧),
simp,
apply F.to_graph.exists_unique_edge_simple_graph,
exact h,
exact hf,
end
def inc_prop {V E : Type} (P : V → V → E → Prop) : list V → list E → Prop
| [] := λ le, false
| (a :: []) := λ le,le.empty
| (a :: b :: lv) := λ le, match le with
| [] := false
| e::es := P a b e ∧ (inc_prop (b::lv) es) end
lemma inc_prop_empty_lv {V E : Type} (P : V → V → E → Prop) : ∀ le : list E,
inc_prop P [] le = false :=
begin
intro le,
induction le with x xs hxs,
unfold inc_prop,
unfold inc_prop,
end
lemma inc_prop_empty_le {V E : Type} (P : V → V → E → Prop) : ∀ lv : list V,
inc_prop P lv [] = (lv.length = 1) :=
begin
intro lv,
induction lv with x xs hxs,
simp,
unfold inc_prop,
tauto,
induction xs with y ys hys,
{
unfold inc_prop,
simp,
},
{
unfold inc_prop,
simp,
}
end
structure finite_graph.walk (F : finite_graph) :=
(lᵥ : list F.V)
(lₑ : list F.E)
(is_adj : inc_prop (λ v w e, F.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧) lᵥ lₑ)
theorem finite_graph.walk.nempty_lᵥ (w : F.walk) : ¬ (w.lᵥ = []) :=
begin
intro h,
have h' := w.is_adj,
rw h at h',
convert h',
end
lemma inc_prop_diff_one {V E : Type} {P : V → V → E → Prop} : ∀ lv : list V, ∀ le : list E,
inc_prop P lv le → lv.length = le.length + 1 :=
begin
intros lv,
induction lv with v tv hv,
{
intros le hve,
exfalso,
convert hve,
},
{
induction tv with w tvv hvv,
{
intros le hve,
induction le with e te he,
refl,
exfalso,
convert hve, symmetry,
tauto,
},
{
intros le' hve',
induction le' with e te he,
tauto,
rw list.length_cons,
congr' 1,
apply hv,
exact hve'.right,
}
}
end
theorem finite_graph.walk.lengths_diff_one (w : F.walk) : w.lᵥ.length = w.lₑ.length + 1 :=
inc_prop_diff_one w.lᵥ w.lₑ (w.is_adj)
def finite_graph.walk.start (w : F.walk) : F.V := begin
haveI : inhabited F.V,
{
constructor,
apply list.choose (λv:F.V,true) w.lᵥ,
simp,
have h := w.nempty_lᵥ,
revert h,
induction w.lᵥ,
case list.nil
{ simp, },
case list.cons : hd tl ih
{ intro h,
use hd,
finish, },
},
exact w.lᵥ.head,
end
def finite_graph.walk.end (w : F.walk) : F.V := begin
haveI : inhabited F.V,
{
constructor,
apply list.choose (λv:F.V,true) w.lᵥ,
simp,
have h := w.nempty_lᵥ,
revert h,
induction w.lᵥ,
case list.nil
{ simp, },
case list.cons : hd tl ih
{ intro h,
use hd,
finish, },
},
exact w.lᵥ.ilast,
end
def finite_graph.walk.closed (w : F.walk) : Prop := w.start = w.end ∧ w.lᵥ.length > 1
def finite_graph.list_gives_walk (F : finite_graph) : list F.V → Prop
| [] := false
| (v::[]) := true
| (v::v'::lv) := F.incid v v' ∧ finite_graph.list_gives_walk (v'::lv)
lemma finite_graph.list_gives_walk_sublist (F : finite_graph) [inhabited F.V] :
∀ v : F.V,∀ l : list F.V,
l ≠ nil → ((F.list_gives_walk (v::l)) ↔ (F.incid v l.head ∧ F.list_gives_walk l)):=
begin
intros v l,
induction l with x xs hxs,
{
intro h,
exfalso,
exact h rfl,
},
{
intros h,
split,
{
intro h',
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk at h',
exact h',
},
{
rintro ⟨h1,h2⟩,
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk,
split,
exact h1,
exact h2,
}
}
end
lemma finite_graph.list_gives_walk_infix (F : finite_graph) {l : list F.V} {h : F.list_gives_walk l} :
∀ l' : list F.V, l' <:+: l → l' ≠ nil → F.list_gives_walk l' :=
begin
intros l' hl',
induction l' with x xs hxs,
{
intro h,
contradiction,
},
{
intro h,clear h,
by_cases hs : xs = nil,
{
rw hs,
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk,
},
haveI : inhabited F.V := ⟨x⟩,
rw F.list_gives_walk_sublist,
swap,
exact hs,
split,swap,
{
apply hxs,
apply is_infix.trans,
swap 3,
exact (x::xs),
apply infix_cons,
refl,
exact hl',
exact hs,
},
{
induction l with y ys hys,
rw eq_nil_iff_infix_nil at hl',
contradiction,
induction ys with z zs hzs,
{
replace hl' := length_le_of_infix hl',
simp at hl',
replace hs := length_pos_iff_ne_nil.2 hs,
linarith,
},
{
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk at h,
by_cases hxy : x = y ∧ xs.head = z,
{
cases hxy with hxy1 hxy2,
rw [hxy1,hxy2],
exact h.1,
},
{
apply hys,
{
intros h1 h2,
clear h2,
apply hxs,
{
transitivity x::xs,
apply infix_cons,
refl,
exact hl',
},
exact hs,
},
{
rw infix_iff_prefix_suffix at hl' ⊢,
rcases hl' with ⟨t,ht,ht'⟩,
use t,
split,
exact ht,
rw suffix_cons_iff at ht',
cases ht' with ht' ht',
swap,
exact ht',
rw ht' at ht,
rw cons_prefix_iff at ht,
simp at hxy,
specialize hxy ht.1,
rw ht.1 at *,
replace ht := ht.2,
exfalso,
apply hxy,
clear hys hzs hxs,
induction xs with u us hus,
contradiction,
simp,
rw cons_prefix_iff at ht,
exact ht.1,
},
exact h.2,
}
}
}
}
end
lemma finite_graph.list_gives_walk_from_walk (F : finite_graph) :
∀ w : F.walk, F.list_gives_walk w.lᵥ :=
begin
intro w,
have hw := w.is_adj,
obtain ⟨lv,hv⟩ : {lv : list F.V // w.lᵥ = lv} := ⟨_, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨le,he⟩ : {le : list F.E // w.lₑ = le} := ⟨_, rfl⟩,
rw hv at hw ⊢,
rw he at hw,
clear hv he w,
revert le,
induction lv with v lv hlv,
{
unfold inc_prop,
tauto,
},
{
induction lv with v' lv' hlv',
{
unfold inc_prop,
tauto,
},
{
intro le,
induction le with e le hle,
{
unfold inc_prop,
tauto,
},
{
intro h,
unfold inc_prop at h,
clear hle hlv',
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk,
split,
{
use e,
exact h.1,
},
{
apply hlv,
exact h.2,
}
}
}
}
end
def finite_graph.get_list_edges (F : finite_graph) (hs : F.simple) :
Π l : list F.V, (F.list_gives_walk l → list F.E)
| [] := λp, []
| [v] := λp, []
| (v::v'::lv) := λp, ((@finite_graph.get_edge_from_incid) F v v' hs (and.left p))::
((finite_graph.get_list_edges (v'::lv)) p.right)
lemma finite_graph.inc_prop_from_list_vertices (l : list F.V) (h : F.list_gives_walk l) (hs : F.simple) :
∃ p : inc_prop (λ v w e, F.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧) l ((F.get_list_edges hs l) h),true :=
begin
induction l with v lv hlv,
{
solve_by_elim,
},
{
induction lv with w lw hlw,
{
constructor,
unfold inc_prop,
solve_by_elim,
exact trivial,
},
{
constructor,
unfold finite_graph.get_list_edges,
unfold inc_prop,
split,
{
unfold finite_graph.get_edge_from_incid,
apply fintype.choose_spec (λe:F.E,F.edge e = ⟦(v,w)⟧)
(F.to_graph.exists_unique_edge_simple_graph _),
exact hs,
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk at h,
apply h.left,
},
{
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk at h,
specialize hlv h.right,
cases hlv with p hp,
exact p,
},
exact trivial,
}
}
end
structure finite_graph.path (F : finite_graph) extends finite_graph.walk F :=
(vertex_unicity : lᵥ.nodup)
(is_open : ¬ to_walk.closed)
def finite_graph.path.length (p : F.path) : ℕ := p.lₑ.length
structure finite_graph.circuit (F : finite_graph) extends finite_graph.walk F :=
(vertex_unicity : (lᵥ.tail).nodup)
(is_closed : to_walk.closed)
def finite_graph.path.start (p : F.path) : F.V := p.to_walk.start
def finite_graph.path.end (p : F.path) : F.V := p.to_walk.end
def finite_graph.are_connected (F : finite_graph) (v v' : F.V) : Prop :=
∃ w : F.walk, w.start = v ∧ w.end = v'
theorem finite_graph.are_connected_def (v v' : F.V) :
F.are_connected v v' ↔ ∃ w : F.walk, w.start = v ∧ w.end = v' := by refl
lemma finite_graph.rmv_unt_aux_gives_walk (F : finite_graph) : ∀ v : F.V, ∀ l : list F.V,
F.list_gives_walk l → (F.list_gives_walk (rmv_unt_aux v l) ∨ (rmv_unt_aux v l) = nil) :=
begin
intros v l hl,
induction l with x xs hxs,
{
unfold rmv_unt_aux,
right, refl,
},
{
unfold rmv_unt_aux,
split_ifs, swap,
{
left,
exact hl,
},
{
induction xs with y ys hys,
{
unfold rmv_unt_aux,
right, refl,
},
{
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk at hl,
cases hxs hl.2 with h' h',
left,
exact h',
right,
exact h',
}
}
}
end
lemma finite_graph.rmv_unt_aux_gives_walk' (F : finite_graph) [inhabited F.V] :
∀ v : F.V, ∀ l : list F.V,
F.list_gives_walk l → F.incid v l.head
→ (F.list_gives_walk (v::rmv_unt_aux v l)) :=
begin
intros v l,
induction l with x xs hxs,
{
intros h h',
unfold rmv_unt_aux,
},
{
intros h h',
unfold rmv_unt_aux,
split_ifs, swap,
{
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk,
split, swap, exact h,
apply h',
},
{
by_cases hs : rmv_unt_aux v xs = nil,
rw hs,
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk,
have hn := rmv_aux_suffix v xs,
cases hn with hn hn,
swap,
{
apply finite_graph.list_gives_walk_infix,
swap 4,
exact xs,
swap,
apply infix_of_suffix hn,
swap,
simp,
rw F.list_gives_walk_sublist at h,
exact h.2,
intro hc,
apply hs,
rw hc,
unfold rmv_unt_aux,
},
rw hn,
suffices : v = x,
rw this,
exact h,
rw mem_cons_iff at h_1,
cases h_1 with hx hx,
exact hx,
rw rmv_aux_eq at hn,
contradiction,
}
}
end
lemma finite_graph.rmv_unt_gives_walk (F : finite_graph) [inhabited F.to_graph.V] :
∀ l : list F.V, F.list_gives_walk l → F.list_gives_walk (rmv_unt l) :=
begin
intros l hl,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : {n : ℕ // l.length = n} := ⟨_, rfl⟩,
revert l,
apply nat.strong_induction_on n,
intros m hm l hl,
induction l with x xs hxs,
{
intro h,
unfold rmv_unt,
exact hl,
},
{
intro h,
unfold rmv_unt,
by_cases hs : xs = nil,
{
rw hs at *,
unfold rmv_unt_aux,
unfold rmv_unt,
},
{
clear hxs,
by_cases hss : rmv_unt (rmv_unt_aux x xs) = nil,
{
rw hss,
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk,
},
{
rw finite_graph.list_gives_walk_sublist at hl ⊢,
swap 3,
exact hs,
swap,
exact hss,
split,
swap,
{
apply hm,
swap 4,
exact (rmv_unt_aux x xs).length,
have hns := rmv_aux_smaller x xs,
simp at h,
linarith,
swap,
refl,
cases (F.rmv_unt_aux_gives_walk x xs) hl.2 with h1 h2,
exact h1,
rw h2 at hss,
rw rmv_unt at hss,
contradiction,
},
{
have hu : (rmv_unt_aux x xs) ≠ nil,
{
intro hu,
rw hu at hss,
unfold rmv_unt at hss,
contradiction,
},
have ha : (rmv_unt (rmv_unt_aux x xs)).head = (rmv_unt_aux x xs).head,
{
revert hu,
induction (rmv_unt_aux x xs) with y ys hys,
intro hp,
contradiction,
intro hp, clear hp,
unfold rmv_unt,
simp,
},
rw ha,
have hb := (F.rmv_unt_aux_gives_walk' x xs) hl.2 hl.1,
revert hb hu,
induction (rmv_unt_aux x xs) with y ys hys,
intros h1 h2,
contradiction,
simp,
unfold finite_graph.list_gives_walk,
tauto,
}
}
}
}
end
set_option trace.check true
theorem finite_graph.are_connected_path (v v' : F.V) (hs : F.simple) :
F.are_connected v v' ↔ ∃ p : F.path, p.start = v ∧ p.end = v' :=
begin
split,swap,
{
rintro ⟨p,hp⟩,
use p.to_walk,
exact hp,
},
{
intro h,
cases h with w hw,
haveI : inhabited F.V := ⟨v⟩,
have hwl := F.list_gives_walk_from_walk w,
have hwn := w.nempty_lᵥ,
have hs1 := rmv_head w.lᵥ hwn,
unfold finite_graph.walk.start finite_graph.walk.end at hw,
cases hw with hw1 hw2,
rw [← hw1,← hw2],
clear hw1 hw2 v v',
constructor,
swap,
{
exact { lᵥ := rmv_unt w.lᵥ,
lₑ := F.get_list_edges hs (rmv_unt w.lᵥ) (F.rmv_unt_gives_walk w.lᵥ hwl),
is_adj :=
begin
have hu := finite_graph.inc_prop_from_list_vertices (rmv_unt w.lᵥ)
(F.rmv_unt_gives_walk w.lᵥ hwl) hs,
cases hu with p hp,
exact p,
end,
vertex_unicity := rmv_nodup w.lᵥ,
is_open :=
begin
unfold finite_graph.walk.closed finite_graph.path.start finite_graph.path.end,
unfold finite_graph.walk.start finite_graph.walk.end,
push_neg,
apply nodup_head_eq_tail_length_1,
exact rmv_nodup w.lᵥ,
end },
},
split,
{
cases hs,
dsimp at *,
unfold finite_graph.path.start finite_graph.walk.start,
simp,
rw ← rmv_head,
refl,
}
}
end
end walk
end graph
|
7a46a79be6d46746ba6efcf2a277898ed0c5eb85 | 1e3a43e8ba59c6fe1c66775b6e833e721eaf1675 | /src/data/nat/basic.lean | f30f8d807470eb192e4faad93764ed927639924b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Sterrs/mathlib | ea6910847b8dfd18500486de9ab0ee35704a3f52 | d9327e433804004aa1dc65091bbe0de1e5a08c5e | refs/heads/master | 1,650,769,884,257 | 1,587,808,694,000 | 1,587,808,694,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 60,993 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.ordered_ring
import algebra.order_functions
/-!
# Basic operations on the natural numbers
This files has some basic lemmas about natural numbers, definition of the `choice` function,
and extra recursors:
* `le_rec_on`, `le_induction`: recursion and induction principles starting at non-zero numbers.
* `decreasing_induction` : recursion growing downwards.
* `strong_rec'` : recursion based on strong inequalities.
-/
universes u v
namespace nat
variables {m n k : ℕ}
-- Sometimes a bare `nat.add` or similar appears as a consequence of unfolding
-- during pattern matching. These lemmas package them back up as typeclass
-- mediated operations.
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b : ℕ} : nat.add a b = a + b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b : ℕ} : nat.mul a b = a * b := rfl
attribute [simp] nat.add_sub_cancel nat.add_sub_cancel_left
attribute [simp] nat.sub_self
@[simp] lemma succ_pos' {n : ℕ} : 0 < succ n := succ_pos n
theorem succ_inj' {n m : ℕ} : succ n = succ m ↔ n = m :=
⟨succ_inj, congr_arg _⟩
theorem succ_le_succ_iff {m n : ℕ} : succ m ≤ succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ⟩
lemma zero_max {m : nat} : max 0 m = m :=
max_eq_right (zero_le _)
theorem max_succ_succ {m n : ℕ} :
max (succ m) (succ n) = succ (max m n) :=
begin
by_cases h1 : m ≤ n,
rw [max_eq_right h1, max_eq_right (succ_le_succ h1)],
{ rw not_le at h1, have h2 := le_of_lt h1,
rw [max_eq_left h2, max_eq_left (succ_le_succ h2)] }
end
lemma not_succ_lt_self {n : ℕ} : ¬succ n < n :=
not_lt_of_ge (nat.le_succ _)
theorem lt_succ_iff {m n : ℕ} : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
succ_le_succ_iff
lemma succ_le_iff {m n : ℕ} : succ m ≤ n ↔ m < n :=
⟨lt_of_succ_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma lt_iff_add_one_le {m n : ℕ} : m < n ↔ m + 1 ≤ n :=
by rw succ_le_iff
-- Just a restatement of `nat.lt_succ_iff` using `+1`.
lemma lt_add_one_iff {a b : ℕ} : a < b + 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
lt_succ_iff
-- A flipped version of `lt_add_one_iff`.
lemma lt_one_add_iff {a b : ℕ} : a < 1 + b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simp only [add_comm, lt_succ_iff]
-- This is true reflexively, by the definition of `≤` on ℕ,
-- but it's still useful to have, to convince Lean to change the syntactic type.
lemma add_one_le_iff {a b : ℕ} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
iff.refl _
lemma one_add_le_iff {a b : ℕ} : 1 + a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
by simp only [add_comm, add_one_le_iff]
theorem of_le_succ {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m.succ) : n ≤ m ∨ n = m.succ :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le H).imp le_of_lt_succ id
/-- Recursion starting at a non-zero number: given a map `C k → C (k+1)` for each `k`,
there is a map from `C n` to each `C m`, `n ≤ m`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def le_rec_on {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n : ℕ} : Π {m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → (Π {k}, C k → C (k+1)) → C n → C m
| 0 H next x := eq.rec_on (eq_zero_of_le_zero H) x
| (m+1) H next x := or.by_cases (of_le_succ H) (λ h : n ≤ m, next $ le_rec_on h @next x) (λ h : n = m + 1, eq.rec_on h x)
theorem le_rec_on_self {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n} {h : n ≤ n} {next} (x : C n) : (le_rec_on h next x : C n) = x :=
by cases n; unfold le_rec_on or.by_cases; rw [dif_neg n.not_succ_le_self, dif_pos rfl]
theorem le_rec_on_succ {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (h1 : n ≤ m) {h2 : n ≤ m+1} {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h2 @next x : C (m+1)) = next (le_rec_on h1 @next x : C m) :=
by conv { to_lhs, rw [le_rec_on, or.by_cases, dif_pos h1] }
theorem le_rec_on_succ' {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n} {h : n ≤ n+1} {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h next x : C (n+1)) = next x :=
by rw [le_rec_on_succ (le_refl n), le_rec_on_self]
theorem le_rec_on_trans {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m k} (hnm : n ≤ m) (hmk : m ≤ k) {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on (le_trans hnm hmk) @next x : C k) = le_rec_on hmk @next (le_rec_on hnm @next x) :=
begin
induction hmk with k hmk ih, { rw le_rec_on_self },
rw [le_rec_on_succ (le_trans hnm hmk), ih, le_rec_on_succ]
end
theorem le_rec_on_succ_left {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (h1 : n ≤ m) (h2 : n+1 ≤ m)
{next : Π{{k}}, C k → C (k+1)} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h2 next (next x) : C m) = (le_rec_on h1 next x : C m) :=
begin
rw [subsingleton.elim h1 (le_trans (le_succ n) h2),
le_rec_on_trans (le_succ n) h2, le_rec_on_succ']
end
theorem le_rec_on_injective {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (hnm : n ≤ m)
(next : Π n, C n → C (n+1)) (Hnext : ∀ n, function.injective (next n)) :
function.injective (le_rec_on hnm next) :=
begin
induction hnm with m hnm ih, { intros x y H, rwa [le_rec_on_self, le_rec_on_self] at H },
intros x y H, rw [le_rec_on_succ hnm, le_rec_on_succ hnm] at H, exact ih (Hnext _ H)
end
theorem le_rec_on_surjective {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (hnm : n ≤ m)
(next : Π n, C n → C (n+1)) (Hnext : ∀ n, function.surjective (next n)) :
function.surjective (le_rec_on hnm next) :=
begin
induction hnm with m hnm ih, { intros x, use x, rw le_rec_on_self },
intros x, rcases Hnext _ x with ⟨w, rfl⟩, rcases ih w with ⟨x, rfl⟩, use x, rw le_rec_on_succ
end
theorem pred_eq_of_eq_succ {m n : ℕ} (H : m = n.succ) : m.pred = n := by simp [H]
@[simp] lemma pred_eq_succ_iff {n m : ℕ} : pred n = succ m ↔ n = m + 2 :=
by cases n; split; rintro ⟨⟩; refl
theorem pred_sub (n m : ℕ) : pred n - m = pred (n - m) :=
by rw [← sub_one, nat.sub_sub, one_add]; refl
@[simp]
lemma add_succ_sub_one (n m : ℕ) : (n + succ m) - 1 = n + m :=
by rw [add_succ, succ_sub_one]
@[simp]
lemma succ_add_sub_one (n m : ℕ) : (succ n + m) - 1 = n + m :=
by rw [succ_add, succ_sub_one]
lemma pred_eq_sub_one (n : ℕ) : pred n = n - 1 := rfl
lemma one_le_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : 1 ≤ m :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h
lemma le_pred_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) : m ≤ n - 1 :=
nat.sub_le_sub_right h 1
lemma le_of_pred_lt {m n : ℕ} : pred m < n → m ≤ n :=
match m with
| 0 := le_of_lt
| m+1 := id
end
/-- This ensures that `simp` succeeds on `pred (n + 1) = n`. -/
@[simp] lemma pred_one_add (n : ℕ) : pred (1 + n) = n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_one, pred_succ]
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero : 0 < n ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨ne_of_gt, nat.pos_of_ne_zero⟩
lemma one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 1 < n ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ n ≠ 1
| 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 := dec_trivial
| (n+2) := dec_trivial
theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt {a b : ℕ} (h1 : a < b + 1) (h2 : ¬ a < b) : a = b :=
have h3 : a ≤ b, from le_of_lt_succ h1,
or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_not_lt h2) (λ h, h) (λ h, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge h3))
protected theorem le_sub_add (n m : ℕ) : n ≤ n - m + m :=
or.elim (le_total n m)
(assume : n ≤ m, begin rw [sub_eq_zero_of_le this, zero_add], exact this end)
(assume : m ≤ n, begin rw (nat.sub_add_cancel this) end)
theorem sub_add_eq_max (n m : ℕ) : n - m + m = max n m :=
eq_max (nat.le_sub_add _ _) (le_add_left _ _) $ λ k h₁ h₂,
by rw ← nat.sub_add_cancel h₂; exact
add_le_add_right (nat.sub_le_sub_right h₁ _) _
theorem sub_add_min (n m : ℕ) : n - m + min n m = n :=
(le_total n m).elim
(λ h, by rw [min_eq_left h, sub_eq_zero_of_le h, zero_add])
(λ h, by rw [min_eq_right h, nat.sub_add_cancel h])
protected theorem add_sub_cancel' {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : m + (n - m) = n :=
by rw [add_comm, nat.sub_add_cancel h]
protected theorem sub_eq_of_eq_add (h : k = m + n) : k - m = n :=
begin rw [h, nat.add_sub_cancel_left] end
theorem sub_cancel {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : a ≤ c) (w : b - a = c - a) : b = c :=
by rw [←nat.sub_add_cancel h₁, ←nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, w]
lemma sub_sub_sub_cancel_right {a b c : ℕ} (h₂ : c ≤ b) : (a - c) - (b - c) = a - b :=
by rw [nat.sub_sub, ←nat.add_sub_assoc h₂, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
lemma add_sub_cancel_right (n m k : ℕ) : n + (m + k) - k = n + m :=
by { rw [nat.add_sub_assoc, nat.add_sub_cancel], apply k.le_add_left }
protected lemma sub_add_eq_add_sub {a b c : ℕ} (h : b ≤ a) : (a - b) + c = (a + c) - b :=
by rw [add_comm a, nat.add_sub_assoc h, add_comm]
theorem sub_min (n m : ℕ) : n - min n m = n - m :=
nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add $ by rw [add_comm, sub_add_min]
theorem sub_sub_assoc {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : b ≤ a) (h₂ : c ≤ b) : a - (b - c) = a - b + c :=
(nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (le_trans (nat.sub_le _ _) h₁)).2 $
by rw [add_right_comm, add_assoc, nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, nat.sub_add_cancel h₁]
protected theorem lt_of_sub_pos (h : 0 < n - m) : m < n :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume : n ≤ m,
have n - m = 0, from sub_eq_zero_of_le this,
begin rw this at h, exact lt_irrefl _ h end)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right : m - k < n - k → m < n :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h, nat.sub_le_sub_right h _)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_left : m - n < m - k → k < n :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (nat.sub_le_sub_left _)
protected theorem sub_lt_self (h₁ : 0 < m) (h₂ : 0 < n) : m - n < m :=
calc
m - n = succ (pred m) - succ (pred n) : by rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁, succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₂]
... = pred m - pred n : by rw succ_sub_succ
... ≤ pred m : sub_le _ _
... < succ (pred m) : lt_succ_self _
... = m : succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁
protected theorem le_sub_right_of_add_le (h : m + k ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
by rw ← nat.add_sub_cancel m k; exact nat.sub_le_sub_right h k
protected theorem le_sub_left_of_add_le (h : k + m ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le (by rwa add_comm at h)
protected theorem lt_sub_right_of_add_lt (h : m + k < n) : m < n - k :=
lt_of_succ_le $ nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le $
by rw succ_add; exact succ_le_of_lt h
protected theorem lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (h : k + m < n) : m < n - k :=
nat.lt_sub_right_of_add_lt (by rwa add_comm at h)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_right (h : m < n - k) : m + k < n :=
@nat.lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right _ _ k (by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_left (h : m < n - k) : k + m < n :=
by rw add_comm; exact nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right h
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_le_right : n - k ≤ m → n ≤ m + k :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.lt_sub_right_of_add_lt
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_le_left : n - k ≤ m → n ≤ k + m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_right : n - k < m → n < m + k :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_left : n - k < m → n < k + m :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le
protected theorem sub_le_left_of_le_add : n ≤ k + m → n - k ≤ m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left
protected theorem sub_le_right_of_le_add : n ≤ m + k → n - k ≤ m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right
protected theorem sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add (H : n ≤ k) : k - n < m ↔ k < n + m :=
⟨nat.lt_add_of_sub_lt_left,
λ h₁,
have succ k ≤ n + m, from succ_le_of_lt h₁,
have succ (k - n) ≤ m, from
calc succ (k - n) = succ k - n : by rw (succ_sub H)
... ≤ n + m - n : nat.sub_le_sub_right this n
... = m : by rw nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
lt_of_succ_le this⟩
protected theorem le_sub_left_iff_add_le (H : m ≤ k) : n ≤ k - m ↔ m + n ≤ k :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add H)
protected theorem le_sub_right_iff_add_le (H : n ≤ k) : m ≤ k - n ↔ m + n ≤ k :=
by rw [nat.le_sub_left_iff_add_le H, add_comm]
protected theorem lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt : n < k - m ↔ m + n < k :=
⟨nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left, nat.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt⟩
protected theorem lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt : m < k - n ↔ m + n < k :=
by rw [nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt, add_comm]
theorem sub_le_left_iff_le_add : m - n ≤ k ↔ m ≤ n + k :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt
theorem sub_le_right_iff_le_add : m - k ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n + k :=
by rw [nat.sub_le_left_iff_le_add, add_comm]
protected theorem sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add (H : k ≤ m) : m - k < n ↔ m < n + k :=
by rw [nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add H, add_comm]
protected theorem sub_le_sub_left_iff (H : k ≤ m) : m - n ≤ m - k ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h,
have k + (m - k) - n ≤ m - k, by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel' H,
nat.le_of_add_le_add_right (nat.le_add_of_sub_le_left this),
nat.sub_le_sub_left _⟩
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_right_iff (H : k ≤ m) : m - k < n - k ↔ m < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff _ _ _ H)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_left_iff (H : n ≤ m) : m - n < m - k ↔ k < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (nat.sub_le_sub_left_iff H)
protected theorem sub_le_iff : m - n ≤ k ↔ m - k ≤ n :=
nat.sub_le_left_iff_le_add.trans nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add.symm
protected lemma sub_le_self (n m : ℕ) : n - m ≤ n :=
nat.sub_le_left_of_le_add (nat.le_add_left _ _)
protected theorem sub_lt_iff (h₁ : n ≤ m) (h₂ : k ≤ m) : m - n < k ↔ m - k < n :=
(nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add h₁).trans (nat.sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add h₂).symm
lemma pred_le_iff {n m : ℕ} : pred n ≤ m ↔ n ≤ succ m :=
@nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add n m 1
lemma lt_pred_iff {n m : ℕ} : n < pred m ↔ succ n < m :=
@nat.lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt n 1 m
lemma lt_of_lt_pred {a b : ℕ} (h : a < b - 1) : a < b :=
lt_of_succ_lt (lt_pred_iff.1 h)
protected theorem mul_ne_zero {n m : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) (m0 : m ≠ 0) : n * m ≠ 0
| nm := (eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero nm).elim n0 m0
@[simp] protected theorem mul_eq_zero {a b : ℕ} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
iff.intro eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (by simp [or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt})
@[simp] protected theorem zero_eq_mul {a b : ℕ} : 0 = a * b ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
by rw [eq_comm, nat.mul_eq_zero]
lemma eq_zero_of_double_le {a : ℕ} (h : 2 * a ≤ a) : a = 0 :=
nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $
by rwa [two_mul, nat.add_le_to_le_sub, nat.sub_self] at h; refl
lemma eq_zero_of_mul_le {a b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (h : b * a ≤ a) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_double_le $ le_trans (nat.mul_le_mul_right _ hb) h
lemma le_mul_of_pos_left {m n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : m ≤ n * m :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← one_mul(m)]},
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (nat.succ_le_of_lt h) dec_trivial,
end
lemma le_mul_of_pos_right {m n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : m ≤ m * n :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← mul_one(m)]},
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (nat.succ_le_of_lt h) dec_trivial,
end
theorem two_mul_ne_two_mul_add_one {n m} : 2 * n ≠ 2 * m + 1 :=
mt (congr_arg (%2)) (by rw [add_comm, add_mul_mod_self_left, mul_mod_right]; exact dec_trivial)
/-- Recursion principle based on `<`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected def strong_rec' {p : ℕ → Sort u} (H : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → p m) → p n) : ∀ (n : ℕ), p n
| n := H n (λ m hm, strong_rec' m)
attribute [simp] nat.div_self
protected lemma div_le_of_le_mul' {m n : ℕ} {k} (h : m ≤ k * n) : m / k ≤ n :=
(eq_zero_or_pos k).elim
(λ k0, by rw [k0, nat.div_zero]; apply zero_le)
(λ k0, (decidable.mul_le_mul_left k0).1 $
calc k * (m / k)
≤ m % k + k * (m / k) : le_add_left _ _
... = m : mod_add_div _ _
... ≤ k * n : h)
protected lemma div_le_self' (m n : ℕ) : m / n ≤ m :=
(eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λ n0, by rw [n0, nat.div_zero]; apply zero_le)
(λ n0, nat.div_le_of_le_mul' $ calc
m = 1 * m : (one_mul _).symm
... ≤ n * m : mul_le_mul_right _ n0)
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le' {x y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : 0 < k) : x ≤ y / k ↔ x * k ≤ y :=
begin
revert x, refine nat.strong_rec' _ y,
clear y, intros y IH x,
cases decidable.lt_or_le y k with h h,
{ rw [div_eq_of_lt h],
cases x with x,
{ simp [zero_mul, zero_le] },
{ rw succ_mul,
exact iff_of_false (not_succ_le_zero _)
(not_le_of_lt $ lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_left _ _)) } },
{ rw [div_eq_sub_div k0 h],
cases x with x,
{ simp [zero_mul, zero_le] },
{ rw [← add_one, nat.add_le_add_iff_le_right, succ_mul,
IH _ (sub_lt_of_pos_le _ _ k0 h), add_le_to_le_sub _ h] } }
end
theorem div_mul_le_self' (m n : ℕ) : m / n * n ≤ m :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos n).elim (λ n0, by simp [n0, zero_le]) $ λ n0,
(le_div_iff_mul_le' n0).1 (le_refl _)
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul' {x y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : 0 < k) : x / k < y ↔ x < y * k :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_mul_le' k0
protected theorem div_le_div_right {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) {k : ℕ} : n / k ≤ m / k :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos k).elim (λ k0, by simp [k0]) $ λ hk,
(le_div_iff_mul_le' hk).2 $ le_trans (nat.div_mul_le_self' _ _) h
lemma lt_of_div_lt_div {m n k : ℕ} (h : m / k < n / k) : m < n :=
by_contradiction $ λ h₁, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge (nat.div_le_div_right (not_lt.1 h₁)))
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : ℕ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c :=
by rw [← H2, nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℕ} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
⟨nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℕ} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = c * b :=
by rw mul_comm; exact nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_left {a b c : ℕ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H1 H2]
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left' {a b : ℕ} (Hd : a ∣ b) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm,nat.div_mul_cancel Hd]
protected theorem div_mod_unique {n k m d : ℕ} (h : 0 < k) :
n / k = d ∧ n % k = m ↔ m + k * d = n ∧ m < k :=
⟨λ ⟨e₁, e₂⟩, e₁ ▸ e₂ ▸ ⟨mod_add_div _ _, mod_lt _ h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁ ▸ by rw [add_mul_div_left _ _ h, add_mul_mod_self_left];
simp [div_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt, h₂]⟩
lemma two_mul_odd_div_two {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 2 = 1) : 2 * (n / 2) = n - 1 :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← nat.mod_add_div n 2, hn, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]}
lemma div_dvd_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (h : b ∣ a) : (a / b) ∣ a :=
⟨b, (nat.div_mul_cancel h).symm⟩
protected lemma div_pos {a b : ℕ} (hba : b ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b :=
nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, lt_irrefl a
(calc a = a % b : by simpa [h] using (mod_add_div a b).symm
... < b : nat.mod_lt a hb
... ≤ a : hba))
protected theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right ha, λ e, e ▸ rfl⟩
protected theorem mul_left_inj {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left ha, λ e, e ▸ rfl⟩
protected lemma div_div_self : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, b ∣ a → 0 < a → a / (a / b) = b
| a 0 h₁ h₂ := by rw eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁; refl
| 0 b h₁ h₂ := absurd h₂ dec_trivial
| (a+1) (b+1) h₁ h₂ :=
(nat.mul_right_inj (nat.div_pos (le_of_dvd (succ_pos a) h₁) (succ_pos b))).1 $
by rw [nat.div_mul_cancel (div_dvd_of_dvd h₁), nat.mul_div_cancel' h₁]
protected lemma div_lt_of_lt_mul {m n k : ℕ} (h : m < n * k) : m / n < k :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
(calc n * (m / n) ≤ m % n + n * (m / n) : nat.le_add_left _ _
... = m : mod_add_div _ _
... < n * k : h)
(nat.zero_le n)
lemma lt_mul_of_div_lt {a b c : ℕ} (h : a / c < b) (w : 0 < c) : a < b * c :=
lt_of_not_ge $ not_le_of_gt h ∘ (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ w).2
protected lemma div_eq_zero_iff {a b : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) : a / b = 0 ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← mod_add_div a b, h, mul_zero, add_zero]; exact mod_lt _ hb,
λ h, by rw [← nat.mul_left_inj hb, ← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ (a % b), mod_add_div,
mod_eq_of_lt h, mul_zero, add_zero]⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_le_div {a b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ a / b) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_mul_le hb $
by rw mul_comm; exact (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le' (lt_of_lt_of_le dec_trivial hb)).1 h
lemma mul_div_le_mul_div_assoc (a b c : ℕ) : a * (b / c) ≤ (a * b) / c :=
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0)).2
(by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_le_mul_left _ (nat.div_mul_le_self _ _))
lemma div_mul_div_le_div (a b c : ℕ) : ((a / c) * b) / a ≤ b / c :=
if ha0 : a = 0 then by simp [ha0]
else calc a / c * b / a ≤ b * a / c / a :
nat.div_le_div_right (by rw [mul_comm];
exact mul_div_le_mul_div_assoc _ _ _)
... = b / c : by rw [nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_comm b, mul_comm c,
nat.mul_div_mul _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero ha0)]
lemma eq_zero_of_le_half {a : ℕ} (h : a ≤ a / 2) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_le_div (le_refl _) h
lemma mod_mul_right_div_self (a b c : ℕ) : a % (b * c) / b = (a / b) % c :=
if hb : b = 0 then by simp [hb] else if hc : c = 0 then by simp [hc]
else by conv {to_rhs, rw ← mod_add_div a (b * c)};
rw [mul_assoc, nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb), add_mul_mod_self_left,
mod_eq_of_lt (nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (mod_lt _ (mul_pos (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb) (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc))))]
lemma mod_mul_left_div_self (a b c : ℕ) : a % (c * b) / b = (a / b) % c :=
by rw [mul_comm c, mod_mul_right_div_self]
/- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number -/
lemma triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * ((n + 1) - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n :=
begin
rw [← add_mul_div_left, mul_comm 2 n, ← mul_add, nat.add_sub_cancel, mul_comm],
cases n; refl, apply zero_lt_succ
end
@[simp] protected theorem dvd_one {n : ℕ} : n ∣ 1 ↔ n = 1 :=
⟨eq_one_of_dvd_one, λ e, e.symm ▸ dvd_refl _⟩
protected theorem dvd_add_left {k m n : ℕ} (h : k ∣ n) : k ∣ m + n ↔ k ∣ m :=
(nat.dvd_add_iff_left h).symm
protected theorem dvd_add_right {k m n : ℕ} (h : k ∣ m) : k ∣ m + n ↔ k ∣ n :=
(nat.dvd_add_iff_right h).symm
/-- A natural number m divides the sum m + n if and only if m divides b.-/
@[simp] protected lemma dvd_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} :
m ∣ m + n ↔ m ∣ n :=
nat.dvd_add_right (dvd_refl m)
/-- A natural number m divides the sum n + m if and only if m divides b.-/
@[simp] protected lemma dvd_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} :
m ∣ n + m ↔ m ∣ n :=
nat.dvd_add_left (dvd_refl m)
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_left {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b ∣ a * c ↔ b ∣ c :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_assoc, nat.mul_left_inj ha]
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_right {a b c : ℕ} (hc : 0 < c) : a * c ∣ b * c ↔ a ∣ b :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_right_comm, nat.mul_right_inj hc]
lemma succ_div : ∀ (a b : ℕ), (a + 1) / b =
a / b + if b ∣ a + 1 then 1 else 0
| a 0 := by simp
| 0 1 := rfl
| 0 (b+2) := have hb2 : b + 2 > 1, from dec_trivial,
by simp [ne_of_gt hb2, div_eq_of_lt hb2]
| (a+1) (b+1) := begin
rw [nat.div_def], conv_rhs { rw nat.div_def },
by_cases hb_eq_a : b = a + 1,
{ simp [hb_eq_a, le_refl] },
by_cases hb_le_a1 : b ≤ a + 1,
{ have hb_le_a : b ≤ a, from le_of_lt_succ (lt_of_le_of_ne hb_le_a1 hb_eq_a),
have h₁ : (0 < b + 1 ∧ b + 1 ≤ a + 1 + 1),
from ⟨succ_pos _, (add_le_add_iff_right _).2 hb_le_a1⟩,
have h₂ : (0 < b + 1 ∧ b + 1 ≤ a + 1),
from ⟨succ_pos _, (add_le_add_iff_right _).2 hb_le_a⟩,
have dvd_iff : b + 1 ∣ a - b + 1 ↔ b + 1 ∣ a + 1 + 1,
{ rw [nat.dvd_add_iff_left (dvd_refl (b + 1)),
← nat.add_sub_add_right a 1 b, add_comm (_ - _), add_assoc,
nat.sub_add_cancel (succ_le_succ hb_le_a), add_comm 1] },
have wf : a - b < a + 1, from lt_succ_of_le (nat.sub_le_self _ _),
rw [if_pos h₁, if_pos h₂, nat.add_sub_add_right, nat.sub_add_comm hb_le_a,
by exact have _ := wf, succ_div (a - b),
nat.add_sub_add_right],
simp [dvd_iff, succ_eq_add_one, add_comm 1] },
{ have hba : ¬ b ≤ a,
from not_le_of_gt (lt_trans (lt_succ_self a) (lt_of_not_ge hb_le_a1)),
have hb_dvd_a : ¬ b + 1 ∣ a + 2,
from λ h, hb_le_a1 (le_of_succ_le_succ (le_of_dvd (succ_pos _) h)),
simp [hba, hb_le_a1, hb_dvd_a], }
end
lemma succ_div_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hba : b ∣ a + 1) :
(a + 1) / b = a / b + 1 :=
by rw [succ_div, if_pos hba]
lemma succ_div_of_not_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hba : ¬ b ∣ a + 1) :
(a + 1) / b = a / b :=
by rw [succ_div, if_neg hba, add_zero]
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (n : nat) {m k : nat} (h : m ∣ k) : n % k % m = n % m :=
begin
conv { to_rhs, rw ←mod_add_div n k },
rcases h with ⟨t, rfl⟩, rw [mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
end
@[simp] theorem mod_mod (a n : ℕ) : (a % n) % n = a % n :=
(eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λ n0, by simp [n0])
(λ npos, mod_eq_of_lt (mod_lt _ npos))
/-- If `a` and `b` are equal mod `c`, `a - b` is zero mod `c`. -/
lemma sub_mod_eq_zero_of_mod_eq {a b c : ℕ} (h : a % c = b % c) : (a - b) % c = 0 :=
by rw [←nat.mod_add_div a c, ←nat.mod_add_div b c, ←h, ←nat.sub_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
←nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, nat.mul_mod_right]
lemma dvd_sub_mod (k : ℕ) : n ∣ (k - (k % n)) :=
⟨k / n, nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add (nat.mod_add_div k n).symm⟩
theorem add_pos_left {m : ℕ} (h : 0 < m) (n : ℕ) : 0 < m + n :=
calc
m + n > 0 + n : nat.add_lt_add_right h n
... = n : nat.zero_add n
... ≥ 0 : zero_le n
theorem add_pos_right (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : 0 < m + n :=
begin rw add_comm, exact add_pos_left h m end
theorem add_pos_iff_pos_or_pos (m n : ℕ) : 0 < m + n ↔ 0 < m ∨ 0 < n :=
iff.intro
begin
intro h,
cases m with m,
{simp [zero_add] at h, exact or.inr h},
exact or.inl (succ_pos _)
end
begin
intro h, cases h with mpos npos,
{ apply add_pos_left mpos },
apply add_pos_right _ npos
end
lemma add_eq_one_iff : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, a + b = 1 ↔ (a = 0 ∧ b = 1) ∨ (a = 1 ∧ b = 0)
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 1 := dec_trivial
| 1 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 1 := dec_trivial
| (a+2) _ := by rw add_right_comm; exact dec_trivial
| _ (b+2) := by rw [← add_assoc]; simp only [nat.succ_inj', nat.succ_ne_zero]; simp
lemma mul_eq_one_iff : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, a * b = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∧ b = 1
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 1 := dec_trivial
| 1 0 := dec_trivial
| (a+2) 0 := by simp
| 0 (b+2) := by simp
| (a+1) (b+1) := ⟨λ h, by simp only [add_mul, mul_add, mul_add, one_mul, mul_one,
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm, nat.succ_inj', add_eq_zero_iff] at h; simp [h.1.2, h.2],
by clear_aux_decl; finish⟩
lemma mul_right_eq_self_iff {a b : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 :=
suffices a * b = a * 1 ↔ b = 1, by rwa mul_one at this,
nat.mul_left_inj ha
lemma mul_left_eq_self_iff {a b : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 :=
by rw [mul_comm, nat.mul_right_eq_self_iff hb]
lemma lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq {n i : ℕ} : n < i.succ ↔ (n < i ∨ n = i) :=
lt_succ_iff.trans le_iff_lt_or_eq
theorem le_zero_iff {i : ℕ} : i ≤ 0 ↔ i = 0 :=
⟨nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, assume h, h ▸ le_refl i⟩
theorem le_add_one_iff {i j : ℕ} : i ≤ j + 1 ↔ (i ≤ j ∨ i = j + 1) :=
⟨assume h,
match nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h with
| or.inl h := or.inr h
| or.inr h := or.inl $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h
end,
or.rec (assume h, le_trans h $ nat.le_add_right _ _) le_of_eq⟩
theorem mul_self_inj {n m : ℕ} : n * n = m * m ↔ n = m :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans (le_antisymm_iff.trans
(and_congr mul_self_le_mul_self_iff mul_self_le_mul_self_iff)).symm
section facts
-- Inject some simple facts into the typeclass system.
-- This `fact` should not be confused with the factorial function `nat.fact`!
instance succ_pos'' (n : ℕ) : _root_.fact (0 < n.succ) := n.succ_pos
instance pos_of_one_lt (n : ℕ) [h : fact (1 < n)] : fact (0 < n) :=
lt_trans zero_lt_one h
end facts
instance decidable_ball_lt (n : nat) (P : Π k < n, Prop) :
∀ [H : ∀ n h, decidable (P n h)], decidable (∀ n h, P n h) :=
begin
induction n with n IH; intro; resetI,
{ exact is_true (λ n, dec_trivial) },
cases IH (λ k h, P k (lt_succ_of_lt h)) with h,
{ refine is_false (mt _ h), intros hn k h, apply hn },
by_cases p : P n (lt_succ_self n),
{ exact is_true (λ k h',
(lt_or_eq_of_le $ le_of_lt_succ h').elim (h _)
(λ e, match k, e, h' with _, rfl, h := p end)) },
{ exact is_false (mt (λ hn, hn _ _) p) }
end
instance decidable_forall_fin {n : ℕ} (P : fin n → Prop)
[H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀ i, P i) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ k h, P ⟨k, h⟩) ⟨λ a ⟨k, h⟩, a k h, λ a k h, a ⟨k, h⟩⟩
instance decidable_ball_le (n : ℕ) (P : Π k ≤ n, Prop)
[H : ∀ n h, decidable (P n h)] : decidable (∀ n h, P n h) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ k (h : k < succ n), P k (le_of_lt_succ h))
⟨λ a k h, a k (lt_succ_of_le h), λ a k h, a k _⟩
instance decidable_lo_hi (lo hi : ℕ) (P : ℕ → Prop) [H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀x, lo ≤ x → x < hi → P x) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ x < hi - lo, P (lo + x))
⟨λal x hl hh, by have := al (x - lo) (lt_of_not_ge $
(not_congr (nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff _ _ _ hl)).2 $ not_le_of_gt hh);
rwa [nat.add_sub_of_le hl] at this,
λal x h, al _ (nat.le_add_right _ _) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left h)⟩
instance decidable_lo_hi_le (lo hi : ℕ) (P : ℕ → Prop) [H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀x, lo ≤ x → x ≤ hi → P x) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀x, lo ≤ x → x < hi + 1 → P x) $
ball_congr $ λ x hl, imp_congr lt_succ_iff iff.rfl
protected theorem bit0_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : bit0 n ≤ bit0 m :=
add_le_add h h
protected theorem bit1_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : bit1 n ≤ bit1 m :=
succ_le_succ (add_le_add h h)
theorem bit_le : ∀ (b : bool) {n m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → bit b n ≤ bit b m
| tt n m h := nat.bit1_le h
| ff n m h := nat.bit0_le h
theorem bit_ne_zero (b) {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : bit b n ≠ 0 :=
by cases b; [exact nat.bit0_ne_zero h, exact nat.bit1_ne_zero _]
theorem bit0_le_bit : ∀ (b) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit0 m ≤ bit b n
| tt m n h := le_of_lt $ nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h
| ff m n h := nat.bit0_le h
theorem bit_le_bit1 : ∀ (b) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit b m ≤ bit1 n
| ff m n h := le_of_lt $ nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h
| tt m n h := nat.bit1_le h
theorem bit_lt_bit0 : ∀ (b) {n m : ℕ}, n < m → bit b n < bit0 m
| tt n m h := nat.bit1_lt_bit0 h
| ff n m h := nat.bit0_lt h
theorem bit_lt_bit (a b) {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : bit a n < bit b m :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (bit_lt_bit0 _ h) (bit0_le_bit _ (le_refl _))
@[simp] lemma bit0_le_bit1_iff : bit0 k ≤ bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [← nat.lt_succ_iff, n.bit1_eq_succ_bit0, ← n.bit0_succ_eq,
bit0_lt_bit0, nat.lt_succ_iff] at h, λ h, le_of_lt (nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h)⟩
@[simp] lemma bit0_lt_bit1_iff : bit0 k < bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, bit0_le_bit1_iff.1 (le_of_lt h), nat.bit0_lt_bit1⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_le_bit0_iff : bit1 k ≤ bit0 n ↔ k < n :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [k.bit1_eq_succ_bit0, succ_le_iff, bit0_lt_bit0] at h,
λ h, le_of_lt (nat.bit1_lt_bit0 h)⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_lt_bit0_iff : bit1 k < bit0 n ↔ k < n :=
⟨λ h, bit1_le_bit0_iff.1 (le_of_lt h), nat.bit1_lt_bit0⟩
@[simp] lemma one_le_bit0_iff : 1 ≤ bit0 n ↔ 0 < n :=
by { convert bit1_le_bit0_iff, refl, }
@[simp] lemma one_lt_bit0_iff : 1 < bit0 n ↔ 1 ≤ n :=
by { convert bit1_lt_bit0_iff, refl, }
@[simp] lemma bit_le_bit_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k ≤ bit b n ↔ k ≤ n
| ff := bit0_le_bit0
| tt := bit1_le_bit1
@[simp] lemma bit_lt_bit_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k < bit b n ↔ k < n
| ff := bit0_lt_bit0
| tt := bit1_lt_bit1
@[simp] lemma bit_le_bit1_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k ≤ bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n
| ff := bit0_le_bit1_iff
| tt := bit1_le_bit1
lemma pos_of_bit0_pos {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < bit0 n) : 0 < n :=
by { cases n, cases h, apply succ_pos, }
/-- Define a function on `ℕ` depending on parity of the argument. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def bit_cases {C : ℕ → Sort u} (H : Π b n, C (bit b n)) (n : ℕ) : C n :=
eq.rec_on n.bit_decomp (H (bodd n) (div2 n))
/- partial subtraction -/
/-- Partial predecessor operation. Returns `ppred n = some m`
if `n = m + 1`, otherwise `none`. -/
@[simp] def ppred : ℕ → option ℕ
| 0 := none
| (n+1) := some n
/-- Partial subtraction operation. Returns `psub m n = some k`
if `m = n + k`, otherwise `none`. -/
@[simp] def psub (m : ℕ) : ℕ → option ℕ
| 0 := some m
| (n+1) := psub n >>= ppred
theorem pred_eq_ppred (n : ℕ) : pred n = (ppred n).get_or_else 0 :=
by cases n; refl
theorem sub_eq_psub (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, m - n = (psub m n).get_or_else 0
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := (pred_eq_ppred (m-n)).trans $
by rw [sub_eq_psub, psub]; cases psub m n; refl
@[simp] theorem ppred_eq_some {m : ℕ} : ∀ {n}, ppred n = some m ↔ succ m = n
| 0 := by split; intro h; contradiction
| (n+1) := by dsimp; split; intro h; injection h; subst n
@[simp] theorem ppred_eq_none : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ppred n = none ↔ n = 0
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by dsimp; split; contradiction
theorem psub_eq_some {m : ℕ} : ∀ {n k}, psub m n = some k ↔ k + n = m
| 0 k := by simp [eq_comm]
| (n+1) k :=
begin
dsimp,
apply option.bind_eq_some.trans,
simp [psub_eq_some, add_comm, add_left_comm, nat.succ_eq_add_one]
end
theorem psub_eq_none (m n : ℕ) : psub m n = none ↔ m < n :=
begin
cases s : psub m n; simp [eq_comm],
{ show m < n, refine lt_of_not_ge (λ h, _),
cases le.dest h with k e,
injection s.symm.trans (psub_eq_some.2 $ (add_comm _ _).trans e) },
{ show n ≤ m, rw ← psub_eq_some.1 s, apply le_add_left }
end
theorem ppred_eq_pred {n} (h : 0 < n) : ppred n = some (pred n) :=
ppred_eq_some.2 $ succ_pred_eq_of_pos h
theorem psub_eq_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : psub m n = some (m - n) :=
psub_eq_some.2 $ nat.sub_add_cancel h
theorem psub_add (m n k) : psub m (n + k) = do x ← psub m n, psub x k :=
by induction k; simp [*, add_succ, bind_assoc]
/- pow -/
attribute [simp] nat.pow_zero nat.pow_one
@[simp] lemma one_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, 1 ^ n = 1
| 0 := rfl
| (k+1) := show 1^k * 1 = 1, by rw [mul_one, one_pow]
theorem pow_add (a m n : ℕ) : a^(m + n) = a^m * a^n :=
by induction n; simp [*, pow_succ, mul_assoc]
theorem pow_two (a : ℕ) : a ^ 2 = a * a := show (1 * a) * a = _, by rw one_mul
theorem pow_dvd_pow (a : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : a^m ∣ a^n :=
by rw [← nat.add_sub_cancel' h, pow_add]; apply dvd_mul_right
theorem pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (h : a ∣ b) : ∀ n:ℕ, a^n ∣ b^n
| 0 := dvd_refl _
| (n+1) := mul_dvd_mul (pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd n) h
theorem mul_pow (a b n : ℕ) : (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [*, nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem pow_mul (a b n : ℕ) : n ^ (a * b) = (n ^ a) ^ b :=
by induction b; simp [*, nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.pow_add, mul_add, mul_comm]
theorem pow_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < p ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := mul_pos (pow_pos _) hp
lemma pow_eq_mul_pow_sub (p : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : p ^ m * p ^ (n - m) = p ^ n :=
by rw [←nat.pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
lemma pow_lt_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (h : 1 < p) (n : ℕ) : p^n < p^(n+1) :=
suffices p^n*1 < p^n*p, by simpa,
nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (nat.pow_pos (lt_of_succ_lt h) n)
lemma lt_pow_self {p : ℕ} (h : 1 < p) : ∀ n : ℕ, n < p ^ n
| 0 := by simp [zero_lt_one]
| (n+1) := calc
n + 1 < p^n + 1 : nat.add_lt_add_right (lt_pow_self _) _
... ≤ p ^ (n+1) : pow_lt_pow_succ h _
lemma pow_right_strict_mono {x : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : strict_mono (nat.pow x) :=
λ _ _, pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right k
lemma pow_le_iff_le_right {x m n : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : x^m ≤ x^n ↔ m ≤ n :=
strict_mono.le_iff_le (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_lt_iff_lt_right {x m n : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : x^m < x^n ↔ m < n :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_right_injective {x : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : function.injective (nat.pow x) :=
strict_mono.injective (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_left_strict_mono {m : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : strict_mono (λ (x : ℕ), x^m) :=
λ _ _ h, pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left h k
lemma pow_le_iff_le_left {m x y : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : x^m ≤ y^m ↔ x ≤ y :=
strict_mono.le_iff_le (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_lt_iff_lt_left {m x y : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : x^m < y^m ↔ x < y :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_left_injective {m : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : function.injective (λ (x : ℕ), x^m) :=
strict_mono.injective (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma not_pos_pow_dvd : ∀ {p k : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hk : 1 < k), ¬ p^k ∣ p
| (succ p) (succ k) hp hk h :=
have (succ p)^k * succ p ∣ 1 * succ p, by simpa,
have (succ p) ^ k ∣ 1, from dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (succ_pos _) this,
have he : (succ p) ^ k = 1, from eq_one_of_dvd_one this,
have k < (succ p) ^ k, from lt_pow_self hp k,
have k < 1, by rwa [he] at this,
have k = 0, from eq_zero_of_le_zero $ le_of_lt_succ this,
have 1 < 1, by rwa [this] at hk,
absurd this dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bodd_div2_eq (n : ℕ) : bodd_div2 n = (bodd n, div2 n) :=
by unfold bodd div2; cases bodd_div2 n; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit0 (n) : bodd (bit0 n) = ff := bodd_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit1 (n) : bodd (bit1 n) = tt := bodd_bit tt n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit0 (n) : div2 (bit0 n) = n := div2_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit1 (n) : div2 (bit1 n) = n := div2_bit tt n
/- iterate -/
section
variables {α : Sort*} (op : α → α)
@[simp] theorem iterate_zero (a : α) : op^[0] a = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem iterate_succ (n : ℕ) (a : α) : op^[succ n] a = (op^[n]) (op a) := rfl
theorem iterate_add : ∀ (m n : ℕ) (a : α), op^[m + n] a = (op^[m]) (op^[n] a)
| m 0 a := rfl
| m (succ n) a := iterate_add m n _
theorem iterate_succ' (n : ℕ) (a : α) : op^[succ n] a = op (op^[n] a) :=
by rw [← one_add, iterate_add]; refl
theorem iterate₀ {α : Type u} {op : α → α} {x : α} (H : op x = x) {n : ℕ} :
op^[n] x = x :=
by induction n; [simp only [iterate_zero], simp only [iterate_succ', H, *]]
theorem iterate₁ {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {op : α → α} {op' : β → β} {op'' : α → β}
(H : ∀ x, op' (op'' x) = op'' (op x)) {n : ℕ} {x : α} :
op'^[n] (op'' x) = op'' (op^[n] x) :=
by induction n; [simp only [iterate_zero], simp only [iterate_succ', H, *]]
theorem iterate₂ {α : Type u} {op : α → α} {op' : α → α → α} (H : ∀ x y, op (op' x y) = op' (op x) (op y)) {n : ℕ} {x y : α} :
op^[n] (op' x y) = op' (op^[n] x) (op^[n] y) :=
by induction n; [simp only [iterate_zero], simp only [iterate_succ', H, *]]
theorem iterate_cancel {α : Type u} {op op' : α → α} (H : ∀ x, op (op' x) = x) {n : ℕ} {x : α} : op^[n] (op'^[n] x) = x :=
by induction n; [refl, rwa [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', H]]
theorem iterate_inj {α : Type u} {op : α → α} (Hinj : function.injective op) (n : ℕ) (x y : α)
(H : (op^[n] x) = (op^[n] y)) : x = y :=
by induction n with n ih; simp only [iterate_zero, iterate_succ'] at H;
[exact H, exact ih (Hinj H)]
end
/- size and shift -/
theorem shiftl'_ne_zero_left (b) {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) : shiftl' b m n ≠ 0 :=
by induction n; simp [shiftl', bit_ne_zero, *]
theorem shiftl'_tt_ne_zero (m) : ∀ {n} (h : n ≠ 0), shiftl' tt m n ≠ 0
| 0 h := absurd rfl h
| (succ n) _ := nat.bit1_ne_zero _
@[simp] theorem size_zero : size 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_bit {b n} (h : bit b n ≠ 0) : size (bit b n) = succ (size n) :=
begin
rw size,
conv { to_lhs, rw [binary_rec], simp [h] },
rw div2_bit,
end
@[simp] theorem size_bit0 {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : size (bit0 n) = succ (size n) :=
@size_bit ff n (nat.bit0_ne_zero h)
@[simp] theorem size_bit1 (n) : size (bit1 n) = succ (size n) :=
@size_bit tt n (nat.bit1_ne_zero n)
@[simp] theorem size_one : size 1 = 1 := by apply size_bit1 0
@[simp] theorem size_shiftl' {b m n} (h : shiftl' b m n ≠ 0) :
size (shiftl' b m n) = size m + n :=
begin
induction n with n IH; simp [shiftl'] at h ⊢,
rw [size_bit h, nat.add_succ],
by_cases s0 : shiftl' b m n = 0; [skip, rw [IH s0]],
rw s0 at h ⊢,
cases b, {exact absurd rfl h},
have : shiftl' tt m n + 1 = 1 := congr_arg (+1) s0,
rw [shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow] at this,
have m0 := succ_inj (eq_one_of_dvd_one ⟨_, this.symm⟩),
subst m0,
simp at this,
have : n = 0 := eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_not_gt $ λ hn,
ne_of_gt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right dec_trivial hn) this),
subst n, refl
end
@[simp] theorem size_shiftl {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) :
size (shiftl m n) = size m + n :=
size_shiftl' (shiftl'_ne_zero_left _ h _)
theorem lt_size_self (n : ℕ) : n < 2^size n :=
begin
rw [← one_shiftl],
have : ∀ {n}, n = 0 → n < shiftl 1 (size n) :=
λ n e, by subst e; exact dec_trivial,
apply binary_rec _ _ n, {apply this rfl},
intros b n IH,
by_cases bit b n = 0, {apply this h},
rw [size_bit h, shiftl_succ],
exact bit_lt_bit0 _ IH
end
theorem size_le {m n : ℕ} : size m ≤ n ↔ m < 2^n :=
⟨λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_size_self _) (pow_le_pow_of_le_right dec_trivial h),
begin
rw [← one_shiftl], revert n,
apply binary_rec _ _ m,
{ intros n h, apply zero_le },
{ intros b m IH n h,
by_cases e : bit b m = 0, { rw e, apply zero_le },
rw [size_bit e],
cases n with n,
{ exact e.elim (eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_lt_succ h)) },
{ apply succ_le_succ (IH _),
apply lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h', bit0_le_bit _ h') h } }
end⟩
theorem lt_size {m n : ℕ} : m < size n ↔ 2^m ≤ n :=
by rw [← not_lt, iff_not_comm, not_lt, size_le]
theorem size_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < size n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw lt_size; refl
theorem size_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : size n = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by have := @size_pos n; simp [pos_iff_ne_zero] at this;
exact not_iff_not.1 this
theorem size_pow {n : ℕ} : size (2^n) = n+1 :=
le_antisymm
(size_le.2 $ pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right dec_trivial (lt_succ_self _))
(lt_size.2 $ le_refl _)
theorem size_le_size {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : size m ≤ size n :=
size_le.2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt h (lt_size_self _)
/- factorial -/
/-- `fact n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
@[simp] def fact : nat → nat
| 0 := 1
| (succ n) := succ n * fact n
@[simp] theorem fact_zero : fact 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fact_succ (n) : fact (succ n) = succ n * fact n := rfl
@[simp] theorem fact_one : fact 1 = 1 := rfl
theorem fact_pos : ∀ n, 0 < fact n
| 0 := zero_lt_one
| (succ n) := mul_pos (succ_pos _) (fact_pos n)
theorem fact_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : fact n ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (fact_pos _)
theorem fact_dvd_fact {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : fact m ∣ fact n :=
begin
induction n with n IH; simp,
{ have := eq_zero_of_le_zero h, subst m, simp },
{ cases eq_or_lt_of_le h with he hl,
{ subst m, simp },
{ apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (IH (le_of_lt_succ hl)) } }
end
theorem dvd_fact : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ fact n
| (succ m) n _ h := dvd_of_mul_right_dvd (fact_dvd_fact h)
theorem fact_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : fact m ≤ fact n :=
le_of_dvd (fact_pos _) (fact_dvd_fact h)
lemma fact_mul_pow_le_fact : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.fact * m.succ ^ n ≤ (m + n).fact
| m 0 := by simp
| m (n+1) :=
by rw [← add_assoc, nat.fact_succ, mul_comm (nat.succ _), nat.pow_succ, ← mul_assoc];
exact mul_le_mul fact_mul_pow_le_fact
(nat.succ_le_succ (nat.le_add_right _ _)) (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)
lemma monotone_fact : monotone fact := λ n m, fact_le
lemma fact_lt (h0 : 0 < n) : n.fact < m.fact ↔ n < m :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw [← not_le], intro hmn, apply not_le_of_lt h (fact_le hmn) },
{ have : ∀(n : ℕ), 0 < n → n.fact < n.succ.fact,
{ intros k hk, rw [fact_succ, succ_mul, lt_add_iff_pos_left],
apply mul_pos hk (fact_pos k) },
induction h generalizing h0,
{ exact this _ h0, },
{ refine lt_trans (h_ih h0) (this _ _), exact lt_trans h0 (lt_of_succ_le h_a) }}
end
lemma one_lt_fact : 1 < n.fact ↔ 1 < n :=
by { convert fact_lt _, refl, exact one_pos }
lemma fact_eq_one : n.fact = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_fact, h], apply lt_irrefl },
{ cases h with h h, refl, cases h, refl }
end
lemma fact_inj (h0 : 1 < n.fact) : n.fact = m.fact ↔ n = m :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy n m with hnm|hnm|hnm,
{ exfalso, rw [← fact_lt, h] at hnm, exact lt_irrefl _ hnm,
rw [one_lt_fact] at h0, exact lt_trans one_pos h0 },
{ exact hnm },
{ exfalso, rw [← fact_lt, h] at hnm, exact lt_irrefl _ hnm,
rw [h, one_lt_fact] at h0, exact lt_trans one_pos h0 }},
{ rw h }
end
/- choose -/
/-- `choose n k` is the number of `k`-element subsets in an `n`-element set. Also known as binomial
coefficients. -/
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _ 0 := 1
| 0 (k + 1) := 0
| (n + 1) (k + 1) := choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
@[simp] lemma choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 := rfl
lemma choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) := rfl
lemma choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _ 0 hk := absurd hk dec_trivial
| 0 (k + 1) hk := choose_zero_succ _
| (n + 1) (k + 1) hk :=
have hnk : n < k, from lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk,
have hnk1 : n < k + 1, from lt_of_succ_lt hk,
by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
@[simp] lemma choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 :=
by induction n; simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
@[simp] lemma choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n :=
by induction n; simp [*, choose, add_comm]
/-- `choose n 2` is the `n`-th triangle number. -/
lemma choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
simp,
{rw triangle_succ n, simp [choose, ih], rw add_comm},
end
lemma choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0 _ hk := by rw [eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; exact dec_trivial
| (n + 1) 0 hk := by simp; exact dec_trivial
| (n + 1) (k + 1) hk := by rw choose_succ_succ;
exact add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) (nat.zero_le _)
lemma succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 (k + 1) := by simp [choose]
| (n + 1) 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) (k + 1) :=
by rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), add_mul, ←succ_mul_choose_eq, mul_succ,
←succ_mul_choose_eq, add_right_comm, ←mul_add, ←choose_succ_succ, ←succ_mul]
lemma choose_mul_fact_mul_fact : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * fact k * fact (n - k) = fact n
| 0 _ hk := by simp [eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| (n + 1) 0 hk := by simp
| (n + 1) (succ k) hk :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ hk₁,
{ have h : choose n k * fact (succ k) * fact (n - k) = succ k * fact n :=
by rw ← choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (le_of_succ_le_succ hk);
simp [fact_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm],
have h₁ : fact (n - k) = (n - k) * fact (n - succ k) :=
by rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), fact_succ],
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * fact (succ k) * ((n - k) * fact (n - succ k)) = (n - k) * fact n :=
by rw ← choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (le_of_lt_succ hk₁);
simp [fact_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc],
have h₃ : k * fact n ≤ n * fact n := mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk),
rw [choose_succ_succ, add_mul, add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, ← add_one, add_mul, nat.mul_sub_right_distrib,
fact_succ, ← nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, add_assoc, ← add_mul, nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm] },
{ simp [hk₁, mul_comm, choose, nat.sub_self] }
end
theorem choose_eq_fact_div_fact {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n k = fact n / (fact k * fact (n - k)) :=
begin
have : fact n = choose n k * (fact k * fact (n - k)) :=
by rw ← mul_assoc; exact (choose_mul_fact_mul_fact hk).symm,
exact (nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (mul_pos (fact_pos _) (fact_pos _)) this).symm
end
theorem fact_mul_fact_dvd_fact {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : fact k * fact (n - k) ∣ fact n :=
by rw [←choose_mul_fact_mul_fact hk, mul_assoc]; exact dvd_mul_left _ _
@[simp] lemma choose_symm {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n (n-k) = choose n k :=
by rw [choose_eq_fact_div_fact hk, choose_eq_fact_div_fact (sub_le _ _), nat.sub_sub_self hk, mul_comm]
lemma choose_symm_of_eq_add {n a b : ℕ} (h : n = a + b) : nat.choose n a = nat.choose n b :=
by { convert nat.choose_symm (nat.le_add_left _ _), rw nat.add_sub_cancel}
lemma choose_symm_add {a b : ℕ} : choose (a+b) a = choose (a+b) b :=
choose_symm_of_eq_add rfl
lemma choose_succ_right_eq (n k : ℕ) : choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) = choose n k * (n - k) :=
begin
have e : (n+1) * choose n k = choose n k * (k+1) + choose n (k+1) * (k+1),
rw [← right_distrib, ← choose_succ_succ, succ_mul_choose_eq],
rw [← nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add e, mul_comm, ← nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, nat.add_sub_add_right]
end
@[simp] lemma choose_succ_self_right : ∀ (n:ℕ), (n+1).choose n = n+1
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_succ_self_right, choose_self]
lemma choose_mul_succ_eq (n k : ℕ) :
(n.choose k) * (n + 1) = ((n+1).choose k) * (n + 1 - k) :=
begin
induction k with k ih, { simp },
by_cases hk : n < k + 1,
{ rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, sub_eq_zero_of_le hk, zero_mul, mul_zero] },
push_neg at hk,
replace hk : k + 1 ≤ n + 1 := _root_.le_add_right hk,
rw [choose_succ_succ],
rw [add_mul, succ_sub_succ],
rw [← choose_succ_right_eq],
rw [← succ_sub_succ, nat.mul_sub_left_distrib],
symmetry,
apply nat.add_sub_cancel',
exact mul_le_mul_left _ hk,
end
section find_greatest
/-- `find_greatest P b` is the largest `i ≤ bound` such that `P i` holds, or `0` if no such `i`
exists -/
protected def find_greatest (P : ℕ → Prop) [decidable_pred P] : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (n + 1) := if P (n + 1) then n + 1 else find_greatest n
variables {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P]
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_zero : nat.find_greatest P 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_eq : ∀{b}, P b → nat.find_greatest P b = b
| 0 h := rfl
| (n + 1) h := by simp [nat.find_greatest, h]
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_of_not {b} (h : ¬ P (b + 1)) :
nat.find_greatest P (b + 1) = nat.find_greatest P b :=
by simp [nat.find_greatest, h]
lemma find_greatest_spec_and_le :
∀{b m}, m ≤ b → P m → P (nat.find_greatest P b) ∧ m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b
| 0 m hm hP :=
have m = 0, from le_antisymm hm (nat.zero_le _),
show P 0 ∧ m ≤ 0, from this ▸ ⟨hP, le_refl _⟩
| (b + 1) m hm hP :=
begin
by_cases h : P (b + 1),
{ simp [h, hm] },
{ have : m ≠ b + 1 := assume this, h $ this ▸ hP,
have : m ≤ b := (le_of_not_gt $ assume h : b + 1 ≤ m, this $ le_antisymm hm h),
have : P (nat.find_greatest P b) ∧ m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b :=
find_greatest_spec_and_le this hP,
simp [h, this] }
end
lemma find_greatest_spec {b} : (∃m, m ≤ b ∧ P m) → P (nat.find_greatest P b)
| ⟨m, hmb, hm⟩ := (find_greatest_spec_and_le hmb hm).1
lemma find_greatest_le : ∀ {b}, nat.find_greatest P b ≤ b
| 0 := le_refl _
| (b + 1) :=
have nat.find_greatest P b ≤ b + 1, from le_trans find_greatest_le (nat.le_succ b),
by by_cases P (b + 1); simp [h, this]
lemma le_find_greatest {b m} (hmb : m ≤ b) (hm : P m) : m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b :=
(find_greatest_spec_and_le hmb hm).2
lemma find_greatest_is_greatest {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] {b} :
(∃ m, m ≤ b ∧ P m) → ∀ k, nat.find_greatest P b < k ∧ k ≤ b → ¬ P k
| ⟨m, hmb, hP⟩ k ⟨hk, hkb⟩ hPk := lt_irrefl k $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_find_greatest hkb hPk) hk
lemma find_greatest_eq_zero {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] :
∀ {b}, (∀ n ≤ b, ¬ P n) → nat.find_greatest P b = 0
| 0 h := find_greatest_zero
| (n + 1) h :=
begin
have := nat.find_greatest_of_not (h (n + 1) (le_refl _)),
rw this, exact find_greatest_eq_zero (assume k hk, h k (le_trans hk $ nat.le_succ _))
end
lemma find_greatest_of_ne_zero {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] :
∀ {b m}, nat.find_greatest P b = m → m ≠ 0 → P m
| 0 m rfl h := by { have := @find_greatest_zero P _, contradiction }
| (b + 1) m rfl h :=
decidable.by_cases
(assume hb : P (b + 1), by { have := find_greatest_eq hb, rw this, exact hb })
(assume hb : ¬ P (b + 1), find_greatest_of_ne_zero (find_greatest_of_not hb).symm h)
end find_greatest
section div
lemma dvd_div_of_mul_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c / a :=
if ha : a = 0 then
by simp [ha]
else
have ha : 0 < a, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero ha,
have h1 : ∃ d, c = a * b * d, from h,
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := h1 in
have hac : a ∣ c, from dvd_of_mul_right_dvd h,
have h2 : c / a = b * d, from nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right ha (by simpa [mul_assoc] using hd),
show ∃ d, c / a = b * d, from ⟨d, h2⟩
lemma mul_dvd_of_dvd_div {a b c : ℕ} (hab : c ∣ b) (h : a ∣ b / c) : c * a ∣ b :=
have h1 : ∃ d, b / c = a * d, from h,
have h2 : ∃ e, b = c * e, from hab,
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := h1, ⟨e, he⟩ := h2 in
have h3 : b = a * d * c, from
nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left hab hd,
show ∃ d, b = c * a * d, from ⟨d, by cc⟩
lemma div_mul_div {a b c d : ℕ} (hab : b ∣ a) (hcd : d ∣ c) :
(a / b) * (c / d) = (a * c) / (b * d) :=
have exi1 : ∃ x, a = b * x, from hab,
have exi2 : ∃ y, c = d * y, from hcd,
if hb : b = 0 then by simp [hb]
else have 0 < b, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb,
if hd : d = 0 then by simp [hd]
else have 0 < d, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero hd,
begin
cases exi1 with x hx, cases exi2 with y hy,
rw [hx, hy, nat.mul_div_cancel_left, nat.mul_div_cancel_left],
symmetry,
apply nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left,
apply mul_pos,
repeat {assumption},
cc
end
lemma pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd {p m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hdiv : p ^ n ∣ k) : p ^ m ∣ k :=
have p ^ m ∣ p ^ n, from pow_dvd_pow _ hmn,
dvd_trans this hdiv
lemma dvd_of_pow_dvd {p k m : ℕ} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hpk : p^k ∣ m) : p ∣ m :=
by rw ←nat.pow_one p; exact pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hk hpk
lemma eq_of_dvd_of_div_eq_one {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b / a = 1) : a = b :=
by rw [←nat.div_mul_cancel w, h, one_mul]
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b / a = 0) : b = 0 :=
by rw [←nat.div_mul_cancel w, h, zero_mul]
/-- If a small natural number is divisible by a larger natural number,
the small number is zero. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b < a) : b = 0 :=
nat.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero w
((nat.div_eq_zero_iff (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le b) h)).elim_right h)
lemma div_le_div_left {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : c ≤ b) (h₂ : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c :=
(nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ h₂).2 $
le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ h₁) (div_mul_le_self _ _)
lemma div_eq_self {a b : ℕ} : a / b = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 1 :=
begin
split,
{ intro,
cases b,
{ simp * at * },
{ cases b,
{ right, refl },
{ left,
have : a / (b + 2) ≤ a / 2 := div_le_div_left (by simp) dec_trivial,
refine eq_zero_of_le_half _,
simp * at * } } },
{ rintros (rfl|rfl); simp }
end
end div
lemma exists_eq_add_of_le : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → ∃ k : ℕ, n = m + k
| 0 0 h := ⟨0, by simp⟩
| 0 (n+1) h := ⟨n+1, by simp⟩
| (m+1) (n+1) h :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_eq_add_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) in
⟨k, by simp [hk, add_comm, add_left_comm]⟩
lemma exists_eq_add_of_lt : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m < n → ∃ k : ℕ, n = m + k + 1
| 0 0 h := false.elim $ lt_irrefl _ h
| 0 (n+1) h := ⟨n, by simp⟩
| (m+1) (n+1) h := let ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_eq_add_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) in ⟨k, by simp [hk]⟩
lemma with_bot.add_eq_zero_iff : ∀ {n m : with_bot ℕ}, n + m = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 0
| none m := iff_of_false dec_trivial (λ h, absurd h.1 dec_trivial)
| n none := iff_of_false (by cases n; exact dec_trivial)
(λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial)
| (some n) (some m) := show (n + m : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ) ↔ (n : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ) ∧
(m : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ),
by rw [← with_bot.coe_add, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe, add_eq_zero_iff' (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)]
lemma with_bot.add_eq_one_iff : ∀ {n m : with_bot ℕ}, n + m = 1 ↔ (n = 0 ∧ m = 1) ∨ (n = 1 ∧ m = 0)
| none none := dec_trivial
| none (some m) := dec_trivial
| (some n) none := iff_of_false dec_trivial (λ h, h.elim (λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial)
(λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial))
| (some n) (some 0) := by erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe]; simp
| (some n) (some (m + 1)) := by erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe]; simp [nat.add_succ, nat.succ_inj', nat.succ_ne_zero]
-- induction
/-- Induction principle starting at a non-zero number. For maps to a `Sort*` see `le_rec_on`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma le_induction {P : nat → Prop} {m} (h0 : P m) (h1 : ∀ n, m ≤ n → P n → P (n + 1)) :
∀ n, m ≤ n → P n :=
by apply nat.less_than_or_equal.rec h0; exact h1
/-- Decreasing induction: if `P (k+1)` implies `P k`, then `P n` implies `P m` for all `m ≤ n`.
Also works for functions to `Sort*`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def decreasing_induction {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n)
(hP : P n) : P m :=
le_rec_on mn (λ k ih hsk, ih $ h k hsk) (λ h, h) hP
@[simp] lemma decreasing_induction_self {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {n : ℕ}
(nn : n ≤ n) (hP : P n) : (decreasing_induction h nn hP : P n) = hP :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_self] }
lemma decreasing_induction_succ {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n)
(msn : m ≤ n + 1) (hP : P (n+1)) :
(decreasing_induction h msn hP : P m) = decreasing_induction h mn (h n hP) :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_succ] }
@[simp] lemma decreasing_induction_succ' {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m : ℕ}
(msm : m ≤ m + 1) (hP : P (m+1)) : (decreasing_induction h msm hP : P m) = h m hP :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_succ'] }
lemma decreasing_induction_trans {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n k : ℕ}
(mn : m ≤ n) (nk : n ≤ k) (hP : P k) :
(decreasing_induction h (le_trans mn nk) hP : P m) =
decreasing_induction h mn (decreasing_induction h nk hP) :=
by { induction nk with k nk ih, rw [decreasing_induction_self],
rw [decreasing_induction_succ h (le_trans mn nk), ih, decreasing_induction_succ] }
lemma decreasing_induction_succ_left {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ}
(smn : m + 1 ≤ n) (mn : m ≤ n) (hP : P n) :
(decreasing_induction h mn hP : P m) = h m (decreasing_induction h smn hP) :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim mn (le_trans (le_succ m) smn), decreasing_induction_trans,
decreasing_induction_succ'] }
end nat
namespace monoid_hom
variables {M : Type*} {G : Type*} [monoid M] [group G]
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem iterate_map_one (f : M →* M) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] 1 = 1 :=
nat.iterate₀ f.map_one
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem iterate_map_mul (f : M →* M) (n : ℕ) (x y) :
f^[n] (x * y) = (f^[n] x) * (f^[n] y) :=
nat.iterate₂ f.map_mul
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem iterate_map_inv (f : G →* G) (n : ℕ) (x) :
f^[n] (x⁻¹) = (f^[n] x)⁻¹ :=
nat.iterate₁ f.map_inv
@[simp]
theorem iterate_map_sub {A : Type*} [add_group A] (f : A →+ A) (n : ℕ) (x y) :
f^[n] (x - y) = (f^[n] x) - (f^[n] y) :=
nat.iterate₂ f.map_sub
end monoid_hom
namespace ring_hom
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] {S : Type*} [ring S]
@[simp] theorem iterate_map_one (f : R →+* R) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] 1 = 1 :=
nat.iterate₀ f.map_one
@[simp] theorem iterate_map_zero (f : R →+* R) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] 0 = 0 :=
nat.iterate₀ f.map_zero
@[simp] theorem iterate_map_mul (f : R →+* R) (n : ℕ) (x y) :
f^[n] (x * y) = (f^[n] x) * (f^[n] y) :=
nat.iterate₂ f.map_mul
@[simp] theorem iterate_map_add (f : R →+* R) (n : ℕ) (x y) :
f^[n] (x + y) = (f^[n] x) + (f^[n] y) :=
nat.iterate₂ f.map_add
@[simp] theorem iterate_map_neg (f : S →+* S) (n : ℕ) (x) :
f^[n] (-x) = -(f^[n] x) :=
nat.iterate₁ f.map_neg
@[simp] theorem iterate_map_sub (f : S →+* S) (n : ℕ) (x y) :
f^[n] (x - y) = (f^[n] x) - (f^[n] y) :=
nat.iterate₂ f.map_sub
end ring_hom
|
dec13500cbc42de39aed4ebe228d40b9e5751104 | cc62cd292c1acc80a10b1c645915b70d2cdee661 | /src/category_theory/follow_your_nose.lean | 73e6058fe2b87053a3f8a3b313f8a9e821afbb25 | [] | no_license | RitaAhmadi/lean-category-theory | 4afb881c4b387ee2c8ce706c454fbf9db8897a29 | a27b4ae5eac978e9188d2e867c3d11d9a5b87a9e | refs/heads/master | 1,651,786,183,402 | 1,565,604,314,000 | 1,565,604,314,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,168 | lean | import category_theory.natural_transformation
import category_theory.opposites
import category_theory.types
import category_theory.tactics.obviously
universes v₁ u₁
open tactic
open opposite
def fyn_names :=
[ `category_theory.category_struct.id,
`category_theory.functor.map,
`category_theory.nat_trans.app,
`category_theory.has_hom.hom.unop,
`category_theory.category_struct.comp,
`prod.mk ]
meta def construct_morphism : tactic unit :=
do ctx ← local_context,
extra ← fyn_names.mmap (λ n, mk_const n),
solve_by_elim { assumptions := return (ctx ++ extra), max_rep := 5 }
meta def fyn := tidy { tactics := tactic.tidy.default_tactics ++ [construct_morphism >> pure "construct_morphism"] }
attribute [tidy] construct_morphism
notation `ƛ` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, { category_theory.functor . obj := f, map := by obviously }) := r
open category_theory
variables (C : Type u₁) [𝒞 : category.{v₁+1} C]
include 𝒞
def yoneda : C ⥤ ((Cᵒᵖ) ⥤ Sort (v₁+1)) := ƛ X, ƛ Y, (unop Y) ⟶ X.
variables (D : Type u₁) [𝒟 : category.{v₁+1} D]
include 𝒟
def curry_id : C ⥤ (D ⥤ (C × D)) := ƛ X, ƛ Y, (X, Y)
|
ca438b1a56d718b215a0e4ca5d1ec92ecdc8044f | efa51dd2edbbbbd6c34bd0ce436415eb405832e7 | /20160406_UW/ex2.lean | cc8cd93b59b251f3999741e199d9099b07f3b4d0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover/presentations | dd031a05bcb12c8855676c77e52ed84246bd889a | 3ce2d132d299409f1de269fa8e95afa1333d644e | refs/heads/master | 1,688,703,388,796 | 1,686,838,383,000 | 1,687,465,742,000 | 29,750,158 | 12 | 9 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,211,670,000 | 1,422,042,683,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 519 | lean | import data.nat
open nat
definition id {A : Type} (a : A) := a
check id 10
check @id nat 10
set_option pp.all true
check id 10
check @id nat 10
variables (A : Type) (R : A → A → Prop)
variables (a b c : A) (f : A → A → A)
theorem simple (H₁ : R (f a a) (f a a)) (H₂ : a = b) :
R (f a b) (f b a) :=
eq.subst H₂ H₁
reveal simple
print simple
example (H₁ : R (f a a) (f a a)) (H₂ : a = b) :
R (f a b) (f b a) :=
@eq.subst A a b (λ x : A, R (f a x) (f x a)) H₂ H₁
|
151e8f791f2b2f693965af0ae00c1af6c6826c92 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/polynomial/unit_trinomial.lean | 0a9f46f7d7edd88f1cf70123bd5a278ef9d9edf2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,183 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import analysis.complex.polynomial
import data.polynomial.mirror
/-!
# Unit Trinomials
This file defines irreducible trinomials and proves an irreducibility criterion.
## Main definitions
- `polynomial.is_unit_trinomial`
## Main results
- `polynomial.irreducible_of_coprime`: An irreducibility criterion for unit trinomials.
-/
namespace polynomial
open_locale polynomial
open finset
section semiring
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] (k m n : ℕ) (u v w : R)
/-- Shorthand for a trinomial -/
noncomputable def trinomial := C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ m + C w * X ^ n
lemma trinomial_def : trinomial k m n u v w = C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ m + C w * X ^ n := rfl
variables {k m n u v w}
lemma trinomial_leading_coeff' (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).coeff n = w :=
by rw [trinomial_def, coeff_add, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul_X_pow, coeff_C_mul_X_pow,
coeff_C_mul_X_pow, if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne', if_neg hmn.ne', if_pos rfl, zero_add, zero_add]
lemma trinomial_middle_coeff (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).coeff m = v :=
by rw [trinomial_def, coeff_add, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul_X_pow, coeff_C_mul_X_pow,
coeff_C_mul_X_pow, if_neg hkm.ne', if_pos rfl, if_neg hmn.ne, zero_add, add_zero]
lemma trinomial_trailing_coeff' (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).coeff k = u :=
by rw [trinomial_def, coeff_add, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul_X_pow, coeff_C_mul_X_pow,
coeff_C_mul_X_pow, if_pos rfl, if_neg hkm.ne, if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne, add_zero, add_zero]
lemma trinomial_nat_degree (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).nat_degree = n :=
begin
refine nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (le_antisymm (sup_le (λ i h, _))
(le_degree_of_ne_zero (by rwa trinomial_leading_coeff' hkm hmn))),
replace h := support_trinomial' k m n u v w h,
rw [mem_insert, mem_insert, mem_singleton] at h,
rcases h with rfl | rfl | rfl,
{ exact with_bot.coe_le_coe.mpr (hkm.trans hmn).le },
{ exact with_bot.coe_le_coe.mpr hmn.le },
{ exact le_rfl },
end
lemma trinomial_nat_trailing_degree (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (hu : u ≠ 0) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).nat_trailing_degree = k :=
begin
refine nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq_some (le_antisymm (le_inf (λ i h, _))
(le_trailing_degree_of_ne_zero (by rwa trinomial_trailing_coeff' hkm hmn))).symm,
replace h := support_trinomial' k m n u v w h,
rw [mem_insert, mem_insert, mem_singleton] at h,
rcases h with rfl | rfl | rfl,
{ exact le_rfl },
{ exact with_top.coe_le_coe.mpr hkm.le },
{ exact with_top.coe_le_coe.mpr (hkm.trans hmn).le },
end
lemma trinomial_leading_coeff (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).leading_coeff = w :=
by rw [leading_coeff, trinomial_nat_degree hkm hmn hw, trinomial_leading_coeff' hkm hmn]
lemma trinomial_trailing_coeff (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (hu : u ≠ 0) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).trailing_coeff = u :=
by rw [trailing_coeff, trinomial_nat_trailing_degree hkm hmn hu, trinomial_trailing_coeff' hkm hmn]
lemma trinomial_monic (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) : (trinomial k m n u v 1).monic :=
begin
casesI subsingleton_or_nontrivial R with h h,
{ apply subsingleton.elim },
{ exact trinomial_leading_coeff hkm hmn one_ne_zero },
end
lemma trinomial_mirror (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (hu : u ≠ 0) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).mirror = trinomial k (n - m + k) n w v u :=
by rw [mirror, trinomial_nat_trailing_degree hkm hmn hu, reverse, trinomial_nat_degree hkm hmn hw,
trinomial_def, reflect_add, reflect_add, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, reflect_C_mul_X_pow,
reflect_C_mul_X_pow, rev_at_le (hkm.trans hmn).le, rev_at_le hmn.le, rev_at_le le_rfl,
add_mul, add_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ←pow_add, ←pow_add, ←pow_add,
nat.sub_add_cancel (hkm.trans hmn).le, nat.sub_self, zero_add, add_comm, add_comm (C u * X ^ n),
←add_assoc, ←trinomial_def]
lemma trinomial_support (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) (hw : w ≠ 0) :
(trinomial k m n u v w).support = {k, m, n} :=
support_trinomial hkm hmn hu hv hw
end semiring
variables (p q : ℤ[X])
/-- A unit trinomial is a trinomial with unit coefficients. -/
def is_unit_trinomial := ∃ {k m n : ℕ} (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) {u v w : units ℤ},
p = trinomial k m n u v w
variables {p q}
namespace is_unit_trinomial
lemma not_is_unit (hp : p.is_unit_trinomial) : ¬ is_unit p :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, m, n, hkm, hmn, u, v, w, rfl⟩ := hp,
exact λ h, ne_zero_of_lt hmn ((trinomial_nat_degree hkm hmn w.ne_zero).symm.trans
(nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_eq_zero_of_is_unit h))),
end
lemma card_support_eq_three (hp : p.is_unit_trinomial) : p.support.card = 3 :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, m, n, hkm, hmn, u, v, w, rfl⟩ := hp,
exact card_support_trinomial hkm hmn u.ne_zero v.ne_zero w.ne_zero,
end
lemma ne_zero (hp : p.is_unit_trinomial) : p ≠ 0 :=
begin
rintro rfl,
exact nat.zero_ne_bit1 1 hp.card_support_eq_three,
end
lemma coeff_is_unit (hp : p.is_unit_trinomial) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ∈ p.support) :
is_unit (p.coeff k) :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, m, n, hkm, hmn, u, v, w, rfl⟩ := hp,
have := support_trinomial' k m n ↑u ↑v ↑w hk,
rw [mem_insert, mem_insert, mem_singleton] at this,
rcases this with rfl | rfl | rfl,
{ refine ⟨u, by rw trinomial_trailing_coeff' hkm hmn⟩ },
{ refine ⟨v, by rw trinomial_middle_coeff hkm hmn⟩ },
{ refine ⟨w, by rw trinomial_leading_coeff' hkm hmn⟩ },
end
lemma leading_coeff_is_unit (hp : p.is_unit_trinomial) : is_unit p.leading_coeff :=
hp.coeff_is_unit (nat_degree_mem_support_of_nonzero hp.ne_zero)
lemma trailing_coeff_is_unit (hp : p.is_unit_trinomial) : is_unit p.trailing_coeff :=
hp.coeff_is_unit (nat_trailing_degree_mem_support_of_nonzero hp.ne_zero)
end is_unit_trinomial
lemma is_unit_trinomial_iff :
p.is_unit_trinomial ↔ p.support.card = 3 ∧ ∀ k ∈ p.support, is_unit (p.coeff k) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hp, ⟨hp.card_support_eq_three, λ k, hp.coeff_is_unit⟩, λ hp, _⟩,
obtain ⟨k, m, n, hkm, hmn, x, y, z, hx, hy, hz, rfl⟩ := card_support_eq_three.mp hp.1,
rw [support_trinomial hkm hmn hx hy hz] at hp,
replace hx := hp.2 k (mem_insert_self k {m, n}),
replace hy := hp.2 m (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n})),
replace hz := hp.2 n (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))),
simp_rw [coeff_add, coeff_C_mul, coeff_X_pow_self, mul_one, coeff_X_pow] at hx hy hz,
rw [if_neg hkm.ne, if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne] at hx,
rw [if_neg hkm.ne', if_neg hmn.ne] at hy,
rw [if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne', if_neg hmn.ne'] at hz,
simp_rw [mul_zero, zero_add, add_zero] at hx hy hz,
exact ⟨k, m, n, hkm, hmn, hx.unit, hy.unit, hz.unit, rfl⟩,
end
lemma is_unit_trinomial_iff' : p.is_unit_trinomial ↔ (p * p.mirror).coeff
(((p * p.mirror).nat_degree + (p * p.mirror).nat_trailing_degree) / 2) = 3 :=
begin
rw [nat_degree_mul_mirror, nat_trailing_degree_mul_mirror, ←mul_add,
nat.mul_div_right _ zero_lt_two, coeff_mul_mirror],
refine ⟨_, λ hp, _⟩,
{ rintros ⟨k, m, n, hkm, hmn, u, v, w, rfl⟩,
rw [sum_def, trinomial_support hkm hmn u.ne_zero v.ne_zero w.ne_zero,
sum_insert (mt mem_insert.mp (not_or hkm.ne (mt mem_singleton.mp (hkm.trans hmn).ne))),
sum_insert (mt mem_singleton.mp hmn.ne), sum_singleton, trinomial_leading_coeff' hkm hmn,
trinomial_middle_coeff hkm hmn, trinomial_trailing_coeff' hkm hmn],
simp_rw [←units.coe_pow, int.units_sq, units.coe_one, ←add_assoc, bit1, bit0] },
{ have key : ∀ k ∈ p.support, (p.coeff k) ^ 2 = 1 :=
λ k hk, int.sq_eq_one_of_sq_le_three ((single_le_sum
(λ k hk, sq_nonneg (p.coeff k)) hk).trans hp.le) (mem_support_iff.mp hk),
refine is_unit_trinomial_iff.mpr ⟨_, λ k hk, is_unit_of_pow_eq_one (key k hk) two_ne_zero⟩,
rw [sum_def, sum_congr rfl key, sum_const, nat.smul_one_eq_coe] at hp,
exact nat.cast_injective hp },
end
lemma is_unit_trinomial_iff'' (h : p * p.mirror = q * q.mirror) :
p.is_unit_trinomial ↔ q.is_unit_trinomial :=
by rw [is_unit_trinomial_iff', is_unit_trinomial_iff', h]
namespace is_unit_trinomial
lemma irreducible_aux1 {k m n : ℕ} (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (u v w : units ℤ)
(hp : p = trinomial k m n u v w) :
C ↑v * (C ↑u * X ^ (m + n) + C ↑w * X ^ (n - m + k + n)) =
⟨finsupp.filter (set.Ioo (k + n) (n + n)) (p * p.mirror).to_finsupp⟩ :=
begin
have key : n - m + k < n := by rwa [←lt_tsub_iff_right, tsub_lt_tsub_iff_left_of_le hmn.le],
rw [hp, trinomial_mirror hkm hmn u.ne_zero w.ne_zero],
simp_rw [trinomial_def, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, add_mul, mul_add, monomial_mul_monomial,
to_finsupp_add, to_finsupp_monomial, finsupp.filter_add],
rw [finsupp.filter_single_of_neg, finsupp.filter_single_of_neg, finsupp.filter_single_of_neg,
finsupp.filter_single_of_neg, finsupp.filter_single_of_neg, finsupp.filter_single_of_pos,
finsupp.filter_single_of_neg, finsupp.filter_single_of_pos, finsupp.filter_single_of_neg],
{ simp only [add_zero, zero_add, of_finsupp_add, of_finsupp_single],
rw [C_mul_monomial, C_mul_monomial, mul_comm ↑v ↑w, add_comm (n - m + k) n] },
{ exact λ h, h.2.ne rfl },
{ refine ⟨_, add_lt_add_left key n⟩,
rwa [add_comm, add_lt_add_iff_left, lt_add_iff_pos_left, tsub_pos_iff_lt] },
{ exact λ h, h.1.ne (add_comm k n) },
{ exact ⟨add_lt_add_right hkm n, add_lt_add_right hmn n⟩ },
{ rw [←add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, add_comm],
exact λ h, h.1.ne rfl },
{ intro h,
have := h.1,
rw [add_comm, add_lt_add_iff_right] at this,
exact asymm this hmn },
{ exact λ h, h.1.ne rfl },
{ exact λ h, asymm ((add_lt_add_iff_left k).mp h.1) key },
{ exact λ h, asymm ((add_lt_add_iff_left k).mp h.1) (hkm.trans hmn) },
end
lemma irreducible_aux2 {k m m' n : ℕ}
(hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (hkm' : k < m') (hmn' : m' < n)
(u v w : units ℤ)
(hp : p = trinomial k m n u v w) (hq : q = trinomial k m' n u v w)
(h : p * p.mirror = q * q.mirror) :
q = p ∨ q = p.mirror :=
begin
let f : ℤ[X] → ℤ[X] :=
λ p, ⟨finsupp.filter (set.Ioo (k + n) (n + n)) p.to_finsupp⟩,
replace h := congr_arg f h,
replace h := (irreducible_aux1 hkm hmn u v w hp).trans h,
replace h := h.trans (irreducible_aux1 hkm' hmn' u v w hq).symm,
rw (is_unit_C.mpr v.is_unit).mul_right_inj at h,
rw binomial_eq_binomial u.ne_zero w.ne_zero at h,
simp only [add_left_inj, units.eq_iff] at h,
rcases h with ⟨rfl, -⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl, h⟩ | ⟨-, hm, hm'⟩,
{ exact or.inl (hq.trans hp.symm) },
{ refine or.inr _,
rw [←trinomial_mirror hkm' hmn' u.ne_zero u.ne_zero, eq_comm, mirror_eq_iff] at hp,
exact hq.trans hp },
{ suffices : m = m',
{ rw this at hp,
exact or.inl (hq.trans hp.symm) },
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub hmn.le, eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le, ←two_mul] at hm,
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub hmn'.le, eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le, ←two_mul] at hm',
exact mul_left_cancel₀ two_ne_zero (hm.trans hm'.symm),
exact hmn'.le.trans (nat.le_add_right n k),
exact hmn.le.trans (nat.le_add_right n k) },
end
lemma irreducible_aux3 {k m m' n : ℕ}
(hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) (hkm' : k < m') (hmn' : m' < n) (u v w x z : units ℤ)
(hp : p = trinomial k m n u v w) (hq : q = trinomial k m' n x v z)
(h : p * p.mirror = q * q.mirror) :
q = p ∨ q = p.mirror :=
begin
have hmul := congr_arg leading_coeff h,
rw [leading_coeff_mul, leading_coeff_mul, mirror_leading_coeff, mirror_leading_coeff, hp, hq,
trinomial_leading_coeff hkm hmn w.ne_zero, trinomial_leading_coeff hkm' hmn' z.ne_zero,
trinomial_trailing_coeff hkm hmn u.ne_zero,
trinomial_trailing_coeff hkm' hmn' x.ne_zero] at hmul,
have hadd := congr_arg (eval 1) h,
rw [eval_mul, eval_mul, mirror_eval_one, mirror_eval_one, ←sq, ←sq, hp, hq] at hadd,
simp only [eval_add, eval_C_mul, eval_pow, eval_X, one_pow, mul_one, trinomial_def] at hadd,
rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, add_comm ↑u, add_comm ↑x, add_assoc, add_assoc] at hadd,
simp only [add_sq', add_assoc, add_right_inj, ←units.coe_pow, int.units_sq] at hadd,
rw [mul_assoc, hmul, ←mul_assoc, add_right_inj,
mul_right_inj' (show 2 * (v : ℤ) ≠ 0, from mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero v.ne_zero)] at hadd,
replace hadd := (int.is_unit_add_is_unit_eq_is_unit_add_is_unit w.is_unit u.is_unit
z.is_unit x.is_unit).mp hadd,
simp only [units.eq_iff] at hadd,
rcases hadd with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
{ exact irreducible_aux2 hkm hmn hkm' hmn' u v w hp hq h },
{ rw [←mirror_inj, trinomial_mirror hkm' hmn' w.ne_zero u.ne_zero] at hq,
rw [mul_comm q, ←q.mirror_mirror, q.mirror.mirror_mirror] at h,
rw [←mirror_inj, or_comm, ←mirror_eq_iff],
exact irreducible_aux2 hkm hmn (lt_add_of_pos_left k (tsub_pos_of_lt hmn'))
((lt_tsub_iff_right).mp ((tsub_lt_tsub_iff_left_of_le hmn'.le).mpr hkm')) u v w hp hq h },
end
lemma irreducible_of_coprime (hp : p.is_unit_trinomial)
(h : ∀ q : ℤ[X], q ∣ p → q ∣ p.mirror → is_unit q) :
irreducible p :=
begin
refine irreducible_of_mirror hp.not_is_unit (λ q hpq, _) h,
have hq : is_unit_trinomial q := (is_unit_trinomial_iff'' hpq).mp hp,
obtain ⟨k, m, n, hkm, hmn, u, v, w, hp⟩ := hp,
obtain ⟨k', m', n', hkm', hmn', x, y, z, hq⟩ := hq,
have hk : k = k',
{ rw [←mul_right_inj' (show 2 ≠ 0, from two_ne_zero),
←trinomial_nat_trailing_degree hkm hmn u.ne_zero, ←hp, ←nat_trailing_degree_mul_mirror, hpq,
nat_trailing_degree_mul_mirror, hq, trinomial_nat_trailing_degree hkm' hmn' x.ne_zero] },
have hn : n = n',
{ rw [←mul_right_inj' (show 2 ≠ 0, from two_ne_zero),
←trinomial_nat_degree hkm hmn w.ne_zero, ←hp, ←nat_degree_mul_mirror, hpq,
nat_degree_mul_mirror, hq, trinomial_nat_degree hkm' hmn' z.ne_zero] },
subst hk,
subst hn,
rcases eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq ↑y ↑v
((int.is_unit_sq y.is_unit).trans (int.is_unit_sq v.is_unit).symm) with h1 | h1,
{ rw h1 at *,
rcases irreducible_aux3 hkm hmn hkm' hmn' u v w x z hp hq hpq with h2 | h2,
{ exact or.inl h2 },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (or.inl h2)) } },
{ rw h1 at *,
rw trinomial_def at hp,
rw [←neg_inj, neg_add, neg_add, ←neg_mul, ←neg_mul, ←neg_mul, ←C_neg, ←C_neg, ←C_neg] at hp,
rw [←neg_mul_neg, ←mirror_neg] at hpq,
rcases irreducible_aux3 hkm hmn hkm' hmn' (-u) (-v) (-w) x z hp hq hpq with rfl | rfl,
{ exact or.inr (or.inl rfl) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (or.inr p.mirror_neg)) } },
end
/-- A unit trinomial is irreducible if it is coprime with its mirror -/
lemma irreducible_of_is_coprime (hp : p.is_unit_trinomial) (h : is_coprime p p.mirror) :
irreducible p :=
irreducible_of_coprime hp (λ q, h.is_unit_of_dvd')
/-- A unit trinomial is irreducible if it has no complex roots in common with its mirror -/
lemma irreducible_of_coprime' (hp : is_unit_trinomial p)
(h : ∀ z : ℂ, ¬ (aeval z p = 0 ∧ aeval z (mirror p) = 0)) : irreducible p :=
begin
refine hp.irreducible_of_coprime (λ q hq hq', _),
suffices : ¬ (0 < q.nat_degree),
{ rcases hq with ⟨p, rfl⟩,
replace hp := hp.leading_coeff_is_unit,
rw leading_coeff_mul at hp,
replace hp := is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left hp,
rw [not_lt, le_zero_iff] at this,
rwa [eq_C_of_nat_degree_eq_zero this, is_unit_C, ←this] },
intro hq'',
rw nat_degree_pos_iff_degree_pos at hq'',
rw ← degree_map_eq_of_injective (algebra_map ℤ ℂ).injective_int at hq'',
cases complex.exists_root hq'' with z hz,
rw [is_root, eval_map, ←aeval_def] at hz,
refine h z ⟨_, _⟩,
{ cases hq with g' hg',
rw [hg', aeval_mul, hz, zero_mul] },
{ cases hq' with g' hg',
rw [hg', aeval_mul, hz, zero_mul] },
end
-- TODO: Develop more theory (e.g., it suffices to check that `aeval z p ≠ 0` for `z = 0`
-- and `z` a root of unity)
end is_unit_trinomial
end polynomial
|
a43df9e81d47ae0870b6ba630bed9fd5ae3e6d92 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/order/default.lean | fba3640f09da3aff03aab7fc24f4a423aae2ab31 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 179 | lean | import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.order.boolean_algebra
import Mathlib.order.complete_lattice
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
|
eb284e54a9c8fbfaacb2287669121c46fde8f4da | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/ring_theory/witt_vector/frobenius.lean | 091181404308ca662de74a26f88f69e02fea98d9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,108 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import data.nat.multiplicity
import ring_theory.witt_vector.basic
import ring_theory.witt_vector.is_poly
import field_theory.perfect_closure
/-!
## The Frobenius operator
If `R` has characteristic `p`, then there is a ring endomorphism `frobenius R p`
that raises `r : R` to the power `p`.
By applying `witt_vector.map` to `frobenius R p`, we obtain a ring endomorphism `𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 R`.
It turns out that this endomorphism can be described by polynomials over `ℤ`
that do not depend on `R` or the fact that it has characteristic `p`.
In this way, we obtain a Frobenius endomorphism `witt_vector.frobenius_fun : 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R`
for every commutative ring `R`.
Unfortunately, the aforementioned polynomials can not be obtained using the machinery
of `witt_structure_int` that was developed in `structure_polynomial.lean`.
We therefore have to define the polynomials by hand, and check that they have the required property.
In case `R` has characteristic `p`, we show in `frobenius_fun_eq_map_frobenius`
that `witt_vector.frobenius_fun` is equal to `witt_vector.map (frobenius R p)`.
### Main definitions and results
* `frobenius_poly`: the polynomials that describe the coefficients of `frobenius_fun`;
* `frobenius_fun`: the Frobenius endomorphism on Witt vectors;
* `frobenius_fun_is_poly`: the tautological assertion that Frobenius is a polynomial function;
* `frobenius_fun_eq_map_frobenius`: the fact that in characteristic `p`, Frobenius is equal to
`witt_vector.map (frobenius R p)`.
TODO: Show that `witt_vector.frobenius_fun` is a ring homomorphism,
and bundle it into `witt_vector.frobenius`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
namespace witt_vector
variables {p : ℕ} {R S : Type*} [hp : fact p.prime] [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
local notation `𝕎` := witt_vector p -- type as `\bbW`
noncomputable theory
open mv_polynomial finset
open_locale big_operators
variables (p)
include hp
/-- The rational polynomials that give the coefficients of `frobenius x`,
in terms of the coefficients of `x`.
These polynomials actually have integral coefficients,
see `frobenius_poly` and `map_frobenius_poly`. -/
def frobenius_poly_rat (n : ℕ) : mv_polynomial ℕ ℚ :=
bind₁ (witt_polynomial p ℚ ∘ λ n, n + 1) (X_in_terms_of_W p ℚ n)
lemma bind₁_frobenius_poly_rat_witt_polynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobenius_poly_rat p) (witt_polynomial p ℚ n) = (witt_polynomial p ℚ (n+1)) :=
begin
delta frobenius_poly_rat,
rw [← bind₁_bind₁, bind₁_X_in_terms_of_W_witt_polynomial, bind₁_X_right],
end
/-- An auxiliary definition, to avoid an excessive amount of finiteness proofs
for `multiplicity p n`. -/
private def pnat_multiplicity (n : ℕ+) : ℕ :=
(multiplicity p n).get $ multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.mpr $ ⟨ne_of_gt hp.1.one_lt, n.2⟩
local notation `v` := pnat_multiplicity
/-- An auxiliary polynomial over the integers, that satisfies
`p * (frobenius_poly_aux p n) + X n ^ p = frobenius_poly p n`.
This makes it easy to show that `frobenius_poly p n` is congruent to `X n ^ p`
modulo `p`. -/
noncomputable def frobenius_poly_aux : ℕ → mv_polynomial ℕ ℤ
| n := X (n + 1) - ∑ i : fin n, have _ := i.is_lt,
∑ j in range (p ^ (n - i)),
(X i ^ p) ^ (p ^ (n - i) - (j + 1)) *
(frobenius_poly_aux i) ^ (j + 1) *
C ↑((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) / (p ^ (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, nat.succ_pos j⟩)) *
↑p ^ (j - v p ⟨j + 1, nat.succ_pos j⟩) : ℕ)
lemma frobenius_poly_aux_eq (n : ℕ) :
frobenius_poly_aux p n =
X (n + 1) - ∑ i in range n, ∑ j in range (p ^ (n - i)),
(X i ^ p) ^ (p ^ (n - i) - (j + 1)) *
(frobenius_poly_aux p i) ^ (j + 1) *
C ↑((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) / (p ^ (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, nat.succ_pos j⟩)) *
↑p ^ (j - v p ⟨j + 1, nat.succ_pos j⟩) : ℕ) :=
by { rw [frobenius_poly_aux, ← fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range] }
/-- The polynomials that give the coefficients of `frobenius x`,
in terms of the coefficients of `x`. -/
def frobenius_poly (n : ℕ) : mv_polynomial ℕ ℤ :=
X n ^ p + C ↑p * (frobenius_poly_aux p n)
/-
Our next goal is to prove
```
lemma map_frobenius_poly (n : ℕ) :
mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) (frobenius_poly p n) = frobenius_poly_rat p n
```
This lemma has a rather long proof, but it mostly boils down to applying induction,
and then using the following two key facts at the right point.
-/
/-- A key divisibility fact for the proof of `witt_vector.map_frobenius_poly`. -/
lemma map_frobenius_poly.key₁ (n j : ℕ) (hj : j < p ^ (n)) :
p ^ (n - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) ∣ (p ^ n).choose (j + 1) :=
begin
apply multiplicity.pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity,
have aux : (multiplicity p ((p ^ n).choose (j + 1))).dom,
{ rw [← multiplicity.finite_iff_dom, multiplicity.finite_nat_iff],
exact ⟨hp.1.ne_one, nat.choose_pos hj⟩, },
rw [← part_enat.coe_get aux, part_enat.coe_le_coe, tsub_le_iff_left,
← part_enat.coe_le_coe, nat.cast_add, pnat_multiplicity, part_enat.coe_get,
part_enat.coe_get, add_comm],
exact (hp.1.multiplicity_choose_prime_pow hj j.succ_pos).ge,
end
/-- A key numerical identity needed for the proof of `witt_vector.map_frobenius_poly`. -/
lemma map_frobenius_poly.key₂ {n i j : ℕ} (hi : i < n) (hj : j < p ^ (n - i)) :
j - (v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) + n =
i + j + (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) :=
begin
generalize h : (v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) = m,
suffices : m ≤ n - i ∧ m ≤ j,
{ rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub this.2, add_comm i j,
add_tsub_assoc_of_le (this.1.trans (nat.sub_le n i)), add_assoc, tsub_right_comm, add_comm i,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_tsub_of_add_le_right ((le_tsub_iff_left hi.le).mp this.1))] },
split,
{ rw [← h, ← part_enat.coe_le_coe, pnat_multiplicity, part_enat.coe_get,
← hp.1.multiplicity_choose_prime_pow hj j.succ_pos],
apply le_add_left, refl },
{ obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ : p ^ m ∣ j + 1,
{ rw [← h], exact multiplicity.pow_multiplicity_dvd _, },
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, c = k + 1,
{ apply nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero, rintro rfl, simpa only using hc },
rw [mul_add, mul_one] at hc,
apply nat.le_of_lt_succ,
calc m < p ^ m : nat.lt_pow_self hp.1.one_lt m
... ≤ j + 1 : by { rw ← tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev hc, apply nat.sub_le } }
end
lemma map_frobenius_poly (n : ℕ) :
mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) (frobenius_poly p n) = frobenius_poly_rat p n :=
begin
rw [frobenius_poly, ring_hom.map_add, ring_hom.map_mul, ring_hom.map_pow, map_C, map_X,
eq_int_cast, int.cast_coe_nat, frobenius_poly_rat],
apply nat.strong_induction_on n, clear n,
intros n IH,
rw [X_in_terms_of_W_eq],
simp only [alg_hom.map_sum, alg_hom.map_sub, alg_hom.map_mul, alg_hom.map_pow, bind₁_C_right],
have h1 : (↑p ^ n) * (⅟ (↑p : ℚ) ^ n) = 1 := by rw [←mul_pow, mul_inv_of_self, one_pow],
rw [bind₁_X_right, function.comp_app, witt_polynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ,
sum_range_succ, tsub_self, add_tsub_cancel_left, pow_zero, pow_one, pow_one, sub_mul,
add_mul, add_mul, mul_right_comm, mul_right_comm (C (↑p ^ (n + 1))), ←C_mul, ←C_mul, pow_succ,
mul_assoc ↑p (↑p ^ n), h1, mul_one, C_1, one_mul, add_comm _ (X n ^ p), add_assoc, ←add_sub,
add_right_inj, frobenius_poly_aux_eq, ring_hom.map_sub, map_X, mul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
add_comm _ (C ↑p * X (n + 1)), ←add_sub, add_right_inj, neg_eq_iff_neg_eq, neg_sub],
simp only [ring_hom.map_sum, mul_sum, sum_mul, ←sum_sub_distrib],
apply sum_congr rfl,
intros i hi,
rw mem_range at hi,
rw [← IH i hi],
clear IH,
rw [add_comm (X i ^ p), add_pow, sum_range_succ', pow_zero, tsub_zero, nat.choose_zero_right,
one_mul, nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_add, add_mul, nat.succ_sub (le_of_lt hi),
nat.succ_eq_add_one (n - i), pow_succ, pow_mul, add_sub_cancel, mul_sum, sum_mul],
apply sum_congr rfl,
intros j hj,
rw mem_range at hj,
rw [ring_hom.map_mul, ring_hom.map_mul, ring_hom.map_pow, ring_hom.map_pow, ring_hom.map_pow,
ring_hom.map_pow, ring_hom.map_pow, map_C, map_X, mul_pow],
rw [mul_comm (C ↑p ^ i), mul_comm _ ((X i ^ p) ^ _), mul_comm (C ↑p ^ (j + 1)), mul_comm (C ↑p)],
simp only [mul_assoc],
apply congr_arg,
apply congr_arg,
rw [←C_eq_coe_nat],
simp only [←ring_hom.map_pow, ←C_mul],
rw C_inj,
simp only [inv_of_eq_inv, eq_int_cast, inv_pow, int.cast_coe_nat, nat.cast_mul,
int.cast_mul],
rw [rat.coe_nat_div _ _ (map_frobenius_poly.key₁ p (n - i) j hj)],
simp only [nat.cast_pow, pow_add, pow_one],
suffices : ((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) * p ^ (j - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩) * p * p ^ n : ℚ) =
p ^ j * p * ((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) * p ^ i) * p ^ (n - i - v p ⟨j + 1, j.succ_pos⟩),
{ have aux : ∀ k : ℕ, (p ^ k : ℚ) ≠ 0,
{ intro, apply pow_ne_zero, exact_mod_cast hp.1.ne_zero },
simpa [aux, -one_div] with field_simps using this.symm },
rw [mul_comm _ (p : ℚ), mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← pow_add, map_frobenius_poly.key₂ p hi hj],
ring_exp
end
lemma frobenius_poly_zmod (n : ℕ) :
mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom (zmod p)) (frobenius_poly p n) = X n ^ p :=
begin
rw [frobenius_poly, ring_hom.map_add, ring_hom.map_pow, ring_hom.map_mul, map_X, map_C],
simp only [int.cast_coe_nat, add_zero, eq_int_cast, zmod.nat_cast_self, zero_mul, C_0],
end
@[simp]
lemma bind₁_frobenius_poly_witt_polynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobenius_poly p) (witt_polynomial p ℤ n) = (witt_polynomial p ℤ (n+1)) :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.map_injective (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) int.cast_injective,
simp only [map_bind₁, map_frobenius_poly, bind₁_frobenius_poly_rat_witt_polynomial,
map_witt_polynomial],
end
variables {p}
/-- `frobenius_fun` is the function underlying the ring endomorphism
`frobenius : 𝕎 R →+* frobenius 𝕎 R`. -/
def frobenius_fun (x : 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p $ λ n, mv_polynomial.aeval x.coeff (frobenius_poly p n)
lemma coeff_frobenius_fun (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (frobenius_fun x) n = mv_polynomial.aeval x.coeff (frobenius_poly p n) :=
by rw [frobenius_fun, coeff_mk]
variables (p)
/-- `frobenius_fun` is tautologically a polynomial function.
See also `frobenius_is_poly`. -/
@[is_poly] lemma frobenius_fun_is_poly : is_poly p (λ R _Rcr, @frobenius_fun p R _ _Rcr) :=
⟨⟨frobenius_poly p, by { introsI, funext n, apply coeff_frobenius_fun }⟩⟩
variable {p}
@[ghost_simps] lemma ghost_component_frobenius_fun (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕎 R) :
ghost_component n (frobenius_fun x) = ghost_component (n + 1) x :=
by simp only [ghost_component_apply, frobenius_fun, coeff_mk,
← bind₁_frobenius_poly_witt_polynomial, aeval_bind₁]
/--
If `R` has characteristic `p`, then there is a ring endomorphism
that raises `r : R` to the power `p`.
By applying `witt_vector.map` to this endomorphism,
we obtain a ring endomorphism `frobenius R p : 𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 R`.
The underlying function of this morphism is `witt_vector.frobenius_fun`.
-/
def frobenius : 𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 R :=
{ to_fun := frobenius_fun,
map_zero' :=
begin
refine is_poly.ext
((frobenius_fun_is_poly p).comp (witt_vector.zero_is_poly))
((witt_vector.zero_is_poly).comp (frobenius_fun_is_poly p)) _ _ 0,
ghost_simp
end,
map_one' :=
begin
refine is_poly.ext
((frobenius_fun_is_poly p).comp (witt_vector.one_is_poly))
((witt_vector.one_is_poly).comp (frobenius_fun_is_poly p)) _ _ 0,
ghost_simp
end,
map_add' := by ghost_calc _ _; ghost_simp,
map_mul' := by ghost_calc _ _; ghost_simp }
lemma coeff_frobenius (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (frobenius x) n = mv_polynomial.aeval x.coeff (frobenius_poly p n) :=
coeff_frobenius_fun _ _
@[ghost_simps] lemma ghost_component_frobenius (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕎 R) :
ghost_component n (frobenius x) = ghost_component (n + 1) x :=
ghost_component_frobenius_fun _ _
variables (p)
/-- `frobenius` is tautologically a polynomial function. -/
@[is_poly] lemma frobenius_is_poly : is_poly p (λ R _Rcr, @frobenius p R _ _Rcr) :=
frobenius_fun_is_poly _
section char_p
variables [char_p R p]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_frobenius_char_p (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (frobenius x) n = (x.coeff n) ^ p :=
begin
rw [coeff_frobenius],
-- outline of the calculation, proofs follow below
calc aeval (λ k, x.coeff k) (frobenius_poly p n)
= aeval (λ k, x.coeff k)
(mv_polynomial.map (int.cast_ring_hom (zmod p)) (frobenius_poly p n)) : _
... = aeval (λ k, x.coeff k) (X n ^ p : mv_polynomial ℕ (zmod p)) : _
... = (x.coeff n) ^ p : _,
{ conv_rhs { rw [aeval_eq_eval₂_hom, eval₂_hom_map_hom] },
apply eval₂_hom_congr (ring_hom.ext_int _ _) rfl rfl },
{ rw frobenius_poly_zmod },
{ rw [alg_hom.map_pow, aeval_X] }
end
lemma frobenius_eq_map_frobenius :
@frobenius p R _ _ = map (_root_.frobenius R p) :=
begin
ext x n,
simp only [coeff_frobenius_char_p, map_coeff, frobenius_def],
end
@[simp]
lemma frobenius_zmodp (x : 𝕎 (zmod p)) :
(frobenius x) = x :=
by simp only [ext_iff, coeff_frobenius_char_p, zmod.pow_card, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
variables (p R)
/-- `witt_vector.frobenius` as an equiv. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def frobenius_equiv [perfect_ring R p] : witt_vector p R ≃+* witt_vector p R :=
{ to_fun := witt_vector.frobenius,
inv_fun := map (pth_root R p),
left_inv := λ f, ext $ λ n, by { rw frobenius_eq_map_frobenius, exact pth_root_frobenius _ },
right_inv := λ f, ext $ λ n, by { rw frobenius_eq_map_frobenius, exact frobenius_pth_root _ },
..(witt_vector.frobenius : witt_vector p R →+* witt_vector p R) }
lemma frobenius_bijective [perfect_ring R p] :
function.bijective (@witt_vector.frobenius p R _ _) :=
(frobenius_equiv p R).bijective
end char_p
end witt_vector
|
053b7196acd5991951f1497ce9f9e05c590140cb | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/data/nat/modeq.lean | 633d134eceb730f11f8ee211cd91fe90c7b3ff39 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,164 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Modular equality relation.
-/
import data.int.gcd algebra.ordered_ring tactic.abel
import data.list.rotate
namespace nat
/-- Modular equality. `modeq n a b`, or `a ≡ b [MOD n]`, means
that `a - b` is a multiple of `n`. -/
@[derive decidable]
def modeq (n a b : ℕ) := a % n = b % n
notation a ` ≡ `:50 b ` [MOD `:50 n `]`:0 := modeq n a b
namespace modeq
variables {n m a b c d : ℕ}
@[refl] protected theorem refl (a : ℕ) : a ≡ a [MOD n] := @rfl _ _
@[symm] protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ a [MOD n] := eq.symm
@[trans] protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ c [MOD n] → a ≡ c [MOD n] := eq.trans
theorem modeq_zero_iff : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ a :=
by rw [modeq, zero_mod, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
theorem modeq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ (n:ℤ) ∣ b - a :=
by rw [modeq, eq_comm, ← int.coe_nat_inj', int.coe_nat_mod, int.coe_nat_mod,
int.mod_eq_mod_iff_mod_sub_eq_zero, int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
theorem modeq_of_dvd : (n:ℤ) ∣ b - a → a ≡ b [MOD n] := modeq_iff_dvd.2
theorem dvd_of_modeq : a ≡ b [MOD n] → (n:ℤ) ∣ b - a := modeq_iff_dvd.1
theorem mod_modeq (a n) : a % n ≡ a [MOD n] := nat.mod_mod _ _
theorem modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq (d : m ∣ n) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
modeq_of_dvd $ dvd_trans (int.coe_nat_dvd.2 d) (dvd_of_modeq h)
theorem modeq_mul_left' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD (c * n)] :=
by unfold modeq at *; rw [mul_mod_mul_left, mul_mod_mul_left, h]
theorem modeq_mul_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD n] :=
modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq (dvd_mul_left _ _) $ modeq_mul_left' _ h
theorem modeq_mul_right' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD (n * c)] :=
by rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b, mul_comm n]; exact modeq_mul_left' c h
theorem modeq_mul_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD n] :=
by rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b]; exact modeq_mul_left c h
theorem modeq_mul (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * d [MOD n] :=
(modeq_mul_left _ h₂).trans (modeq_mul_right _ h₁)
theorem modeq_add (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n] :=
modeq_of_dvd begin
convert dvd_add (dvd_of_modeq h₁) (dvd_of_modeq h₂) using 1,
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_comm, add_comm],
end
theorem modeq_add_cancel_left (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) : c ≡ d [MOD n] :=
begin
simp only [modeq_iff_dvd] at *,
convert _root_.dvd_sub h₂ h₁ using 1,
simp [sub_eq_add_neg],
abel
end
theorem modeq_add_cancel_right (h₁ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
by rw [add_comm a, add_comm b] at h₂; exact modeq_add_cancel_left h₁ h₂
theorem modeq_of_modeq_mul_left (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD m * n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
by rw [modeq_iff_dvd] at *; exact dvd.trans (dvd_mul_left (n : ℤ) (m : ℤ)) h
theorem modeq_of_modeq_mul_right (m : ℕ) : a ≡ b [MOD n * m] → a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
mul_comm m n ▸ modeq_of_modeq_mul_left _
def chinese_remainder (co : coprime n m) (a b : ℕ) : {k // k ≡ a [MOD n] ∧ k ≡ b [MOD m]} :=
⟨let (c, d) := xgcd n m in int.to_nat ((b * c * n + a * d * m) % (n * m)), begin
rw xgcd_val, dsimp [chinese_remainder._match_1],
rw [modeq_iff_dvd, modeq_iff_dvd],
rw [int.to_nat_of_nonneg], swap,
{ by_cases h₁ : n = 0, {simp [coprime, h₁] at co, substs m n, simp},
by_cases h₂ : m = 0, {simp [coprime, h₂] at co, substs m n, simp},
exact int.mod_nonneg _
(mul_ne_zero (int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 h₁) (int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 h₂)) },
have := gcd_eq_gcd_ab n m, simp [co.gcd_eq_one, mul_comm] at this,
rw [int.mod_def, ← sub_add, ← sub_add]; split,
{ refine dvd_add _ (dvd_trans (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
rw [add_comm, ← sub_sub], refine _root_.dvd_sub _ (dvd_mul_left _ _),
have := congr_arg ((*) ↑a) this,
exact ⟨_, by rwa [mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_one, mul_comm,
← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at this⟩ },
{ refine dvd_add _ (dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left _ _) (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
rw [← sub_sub], refine _root_.dvd_sub _ (dvd_mul_left _ _),
have := congr_arg ((*) ↑b) this,
exact ⟨_, by rwa [mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_one, mul_comm _ ↑m,
← sub_eq_iff_eq_add'] at this⟩ }
end⟩
lemma modeq_and_modeq_iff_modeq_mul {a b m n : ℕ} (hmn : coprime m n) :
a ≡ b [MOD m] ∧ a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ (a ≡ b [MOD m * n]) :=
⟨λ h, begin
rw [nat.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd, nat.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd, ← int.dvd_nat_abs,
int.coe_nat_dvd, ← int.dvd_nat_abs, int.coe_nat_dvd] at h,
rw [nat.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd, ← int.dvd_nat_abs, int.coe_nat_dvd],
exact hmn.mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd h.1 h.2
end,
λ h, ⟨nat.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_right _ h, nat.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_left _ h⟩⟩
lemma coprime_of_mul_modeq_one (b : ℕ) {a n : ℕ} (h : a * b ≡ 1 [MOD n]) : coprime a n :=
nat.coprime_of_dvd' (λ k ⟨ka, hka⟩ ⟨kb, hkb⟩, int.coe_nat_dvd.1 begin
rw [hka, hkb, modeq_iff_dvd] at h,
cases h with z hz,
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz,
rw [hz, int.coe_nat_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, int.coe_nat_mul, ← mul_add],
exact dvd_mul_right _ _,
end)
end modeq
@[simp] lemma mod_mul_right_mod (a b c : ℕ) : a % (b * c) % b = a % b :=
modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_right _ (modeq.mod_modeq _ _)
@[simp] lemma mod_mul_left_mod (a b c : ℕ) : a % (b * c) % c = a % c :=
modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_left _ (modeq.mod_modeq _ _)
lemma div_mod_eq_mod_mul_div (a b c : ℕ) : a / b % c = a % (b * c) / b :=
if hb0 : b = 0 then by simp [hb0]
else by rw [← @add_right_cancel_iff _ _ (c * (a / b / c)), mod_add_div, nat.div_div_eq_div_mul,
← nat.mul_left_inj (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb0),← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ (a % b), mod_add_div,
mul_add, ← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ (a % (b * c) % b), add_left_comm,
← add_assoc (a % (b * c) % b), mod_add_div, ← mul_assoc, mod_add_div, mod_mul_right_mod]
lemma add_mod_add_ite (a b c : ℕ) :
(a + b) % c + (if c ≤ a % c + b % c then c else 0) = a % c + b % c :=
have (a + b) % c = (a % c + b % c) % c,
from nat.modeq.modeq_add (nat.modeq.mod_modeq _ _).symm (nat.modeq.mod_modeq _ _).symm,
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else
begin
rw this,
split_ifs,
{ have h2 : (a % c + b % c) / c < 2,
from nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (by rw mul_two;
exact add_lt_add (nat.mod_lt _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0))
(nat.mod_lt _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0))),
have h0 : 0 < (a % c + b % c) / c, from nat.div_pos h (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0),
rw [← @add_right_cancel_iff _ _ (c * ((a % c + b % c) / c)), add_comm _ c, add_assoc,
mod_add_div, le_antisymm (le_of_lt_succ h2) h0, mul_one, add_comm] },
{ rw [nat.mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge h), add_zero] }
end
lemma add_mod_of_add_mod_lt {a b c : ℕ} (hc : a % c + b % c < c) :
(a + b) % c = a % c + b % c :=
by rw [← add_mod_add_ite, if_neg (not_le_of_lt hc), add_zero]
lemma add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod {a b c : ℕ} (hc : c ≤ a % c + b % c) :
(a + b) % c + c = a % c + b % c :=
by rw [← add_mod_add_ite, if_pos hc]
lemma add_div {a b c : ℕ} (hc0 : 0 < c) : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c +
if c ≤ a % c + b % c then 1 else 0 :=
begin
rw [← nat.mul_left_inj hc0, ← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ ((a + b) % c + a % c + b % c)],
suffices : (a + b) % c + c * ((a + b) / c) + a % c + b % c =
a % c + c * (a / c) + (b % c + c * (b / c)) + c * (if c ≤ a % c + b % c then 1 else 0) + (a + b) % c,
{ simpa only [mul_add, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] },
rw [mod_add_div, mod_add_div, mod_add_div, mul_ite, add_assoc, add_assoc],
conv_lhs { rw ← add_mod_add_ite },
simp, ac_refl
end
lemma add_div_eq_of_add_mod_lt {a b c : ℕ} (hc : a % c + b % c < c) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else by rw [add_div (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0), if_neg (not_le_of_lt hc), add_zero]
lemma add_div_eq_of_le_mod_add_mod {a b c : ℕ} (hc : c ≤ a % c + b % c) (hc0 : 0 < c) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c + 1 :=
by rw [add_div hc0, if_pos hc]
lemma add_div_le_add_div (a b c : ℕ) : a / c + b / c ≤ (a + b) / c :=
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else by rw [nat.add_div (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0)]; exact le_add_right _ _
lemma le_mod_add_mod_of_dvd_add_of_not_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (h : c ∣ a + b) (ha : ¬ c ∣ a) :
c ≤ a % c + b % c :=
by_contradiction $ λ hc,
have (a + b) % c = a % c + b % c, from add_mod_of_add_mod_lt (lt_of_not_ge hc),
by simp [dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, *] at *
lemma odd_mul_odd {n m : ℕ} (hn1 : n % 2 = 1) (hm1 : m % 2 = 1) : (n * m) % 2 = 1 :=
show (n * m) % 2 = (1 * 1) % 2, from nat.modeq.modeq_mul hn1 hm1
lemma odd_mul_odd_div_two {m n : ℕ} (hm1 : m % 2 = 1) (hn1 : n % 2 = 1) :
(m * n) / 2 = m * (n / 2) + m / 2 :=
have hm0 : 0 < m := nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, by simp * at *),
have hn0 : 0 < n := nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, by simp * at *),
(nat.mul_left_inj (show 0 < 2, from dec_trivial)).1 $
by rw [mul_add, two_mul_odd_div_two hm1, mul_left_comm, two_mul_odd_div_two hn1,
two_mul_odd_div_two (nat.odd_mul_odd hm1 hn1), nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, mul_one,
← nat.add_sub_assoc hm0, nat.sub_add_cancel (le_mul_of_one_le_right' (nat.zero_le _) hn0)]
lemma odd_of_mod_four_eq_one {n : ℕ} (h : n % 4 = 1) : n % 2 = 1 :=
@modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_left 2 n 1 2 h
lemma odd_of_mod_four_eq_three {n : ℕ} (h : n % 4 = 3) : n % 2 = 1 :=
@modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_left 2 n 3 2 h
end nat
namespace list
variable {α : Type*}
lemma nth_rotate : ∀ {l : list α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length),
(l.rotate n).nth m = l.nth ((m + n) % l.length)
| [] n m hml := (nat.not_lt_zero _ hml).elim
| l 0 m hml := by simp [nat.mod_eq_of_lt hml]
| (a::l) (n+1) m hml :=
have h₃ : m < list.length (l ++ [a]), by simpa using hml,
(lt_or_eq_of_le (nat.le_of_lt_succ $ nat.mod_lt (m + n)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) hml))).elim
(λ hml',
have h₁ : (m + (n + 1)) % ((a :: l : list α).length) =
(m + n) % ((a :: l : list α).length) + 1,
from calc (m + (n + 1)) % (l.length + 1) =
((m + n) % (l.length + 1) + 1) % (l.length + 1) :
add_assoc m n 1 ▸ nat.modeq.modeq_add (nat.mod_mod _ _).symm rfl
... = (m + n) % (l.length + 1) + 1 : nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.succ_lt_succ hml'),
have h₂ : (m + n) % (l ++ [a]).length < l.length, by simpa [nat.add_one] using hml',
by rw [list.rotate_cons_succ, nth_rotate h₃, list.nth_append h₂, h₁, list.nth]; simp)
(λ hml',
have h₁ : (m + (n + 1)) % (l.length + 1) = 0,
from calc (m + (n + 1)) % (l.length + 1) = (l.length + 1) % (l.length + 1) :
add_assoc m n 1 ▸ nat.modeq.modeq_add
(hml'.trans (nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.lt_succ_self _)).symm) rfl
... = 0 : by simp,
have h₂ : l.length < (l ++ [a]).length, by simp [nat.lt_succ_self],
by rw [list.length, list.rotate_cons_succ, nth_rotate h₃, list.length_append,
list.length_cons, list.length, zero_add, hml', h₁, list.nth_concat_length]; refl)
lemma rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_repeat [hα : nonempty α] : ∀ {l : list α},
(∀ n, l.rotate n = l) ↔ ∃ a, l = list.repeat a l.length
| [] := ⟨λ h, nonempty.elim hα (λ a, ⟨a, by simp⟩), by simp⟩
| (a::l) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨a, list.ext_le (by simp) $ λ n hn h₁,
begin
rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth],
conv {to_lhs, rw ← h ((list.length (a :: l)) - n)},
rw [nth_rotate hn, nat.add_sub_cancel' (le_of_lt hn),
nat.mod_self, nth_le_repeat _ hn], refl
end⟩,
λ ⟨a, ha⟩ n, ha.symm ▸ list.ext_le (by simp)
(λ m hm h,
have hm' : (m + n) % (list.repeat a (list.length (a :: l))).length < list.length (a :: l),
by rw list.length_repeat; exact nat.mod_lt _ (nat.succ_pos _),
by rw [nth_le_repeat, ← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, nth_rotate h, list.nth_le_nth,
nth_le_repeat]; simp * at *)⟩
end list
|
c5dce545a95e1bfb9eb9fbc181d4da3761c251f8 | 1446f520c1db37e157b631385707cc28a17a595e | /src/Init/Data/Array/Basic.lean | 39910780844ac7ef3d017f22cf619ca20cf254fd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bdbabiak/lean4 | cab06b8a2606d99a168dd279efdd404edb4e825a | 3f4d0d78b2ce3ef541cb643bbe21496bd6b057ac | refs/heads/master | 1,615,045,275,530 | 1,583,793,696,000 | 1,583,793,696,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,670 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.UInt
import Init.Data.Repr
import Init.Data.ToString
import Init.Control.Id
import Init.Util
universes u v w
/-
The Compiler has special support for arrays.
They are implemented using dynamic arrays: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_array
-/
structure Array (α : Type u) :=
(sz : Nat)
(data : Fin sz → α)
attribute [extern "lean_array_mk"] Array.mk
attribute [extern "lean_array_data"] Array.data
attribute [extern "lean_array_sz"] Array.sz
@[reducible, extern "lean_array_get_size"]
def Array.size {α : Type u} (a : @& Array α) : Nat :=
a.sz
namespace Array
variables {α : Type u}
/- The parameter `c` is the initial capacity -/
@[extern "lean_mk_empty_array_with_capacity"]
def mkEmpty (c : @& Nat) : Array α :=
{ sz := 0,
data := fun ⟨x, h⟩ => absurd h (Nat.notLtZero x) }
@[extern "lean_array_push"]
def push (a : Array α) (v : α) : Array α :=
{ sz := Nat.succ a.sz,
data := fun ⟨j, h₁⟩ =>
if h₂ : j = a.sz then v
else a.data ⟨j, Nat.ltOfLeOfNe (Nat.leOfLtSucc h₁) h₂⟩ }
@[extern "lean_mk_array"]
def mkArray {α : Type u} (n : Nat) (v : α) : Array α :=
{ sz := n,
data := fun _ => v}
theorem szMkArrayEq {α : Type u} (n : Nat) (v : α) : (mkArray n v).sz = n :=
rfl
def empty : Array α :=
mkEmpty 0
instance : HasEmptyc (Array α) :=
⟨Array.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited (Array α) :=
⟨Array.empty⟩
def isEmpty (a : Array α) : Bool :=
a.size = 0
def singleton (v : α) : Array α :=
mkArray 1 v
@[extern "lean_array_fget"]
def get (a : @& Array α) (i : @& Fin a.size) : α :=
a.data i
/- Low-level version of `fget` which is as fast as a C array read.
`Fin` values are represented as tag pointers in the Lean runtime. Thus,
`fget` may be slightly slower than `uget`. -/
@[extern "lean_array_uget"]
def uget (a : @& Array α) (i : USize) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : α :=
a.get ⟨i.toNat, h⟩
/- "Comfortable" version of `fget`. It performs a bound check at runtime. -/
@[extern "lean_array_get"]
def get! [Inhabited α] (a : @& Array α) (i : @& Nat) : α :=
if h : i < a.size then a.get ⟨i, h⟩ else arbitrary α
def back [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : α :=
a.get! (a.size - 1)
def get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Option α :=
if h : i < a.size then some (a.get ⟨i, h⟩) else none
def getD (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v₀ : α) : α :=
if h : i < a.size then a.get ⟨i, h⟩ else v₀
def getOp [Inhabited α] (self : Array α) (idx : Nat) : α :=
self.get! idx
@[extern "lean_array_fset"]
def set (a : Array α) (i : @& Fin a.size) (v : α) : Array α :=
{ sz := a.sz,
data := fun j => if h : i = j then v else a.data j }
theorem szFSetEq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) : (set a i v).size = a.size :=
rfl
theorem szPushEq (a : Array α) (v : α) : (push a v).size = a.size + 1 :=
rfl
/- Low-level version of `fset` which is as fast as a C array fset.
`Fin` values are represented as tag pointers in the Lean runtime. Thus,
`fset` may be slightly slower than `uset`. -/
@[extern "lean_array_uset"]
def uset (a : Array α) (i : USize) (v : α) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : Array α :=
a.set ⟨i.toNat, h⟩ v
/- "Comfortable" version of `fset`. It performs a bound check at runtime. -/
@[extern "lean_array_set"]
def set! (a : Array α) (i : @& Nat) (v : α) : Array α :=
if h : i < a.size then a.set ⟨i, h⟩ v else panic! "index out of bounds"
@[extern "lean_array_fswap"]
def swap (a : Array α) (i j : @& Fin a.size) : Array α :=
let v₁ := a.get i;
let v₂ := a.get j;
let a := a.set i v₂;
a.set j v₁
@[extern "lean_array_swap"]
def swap! (a : Array α) (i j : @& Nat) : Array α :=
if h₁ : i < a.size then
if h₂ : j < a.size then swap a ⟨i, h₁⟩ ⟨j, h₂⟩
else panic! "index out of bounds"
else panic! "index out of bounds"
@[inline] def swapAt {α : Type} (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) : α × Array α :=
let e := a.get i;
let a := a.set i v;
(e, a)
-- TODO: delete as soon as we can define local instances
@[neverExtract] private def swapAtPanic! [Inhabited α] (i : Nat) : α × Array α :=
panic! ("index " ++ toString i ++ " out of bounds")
@[inline] def swapAt! {α : Type} (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v : α) : α × Array α :=
if h : i < a.size then swapAt a ⟨i, h⟩ v else @swapAtPanic! _ ⟨v⟩ i
@[extern "lean_array_pop"]
def pop (a : Array α) : Array α :=
{ sz := Nat.pred a.size,
data := fun ⟨j, h⟩ => a.get ⟨j, Nat.ltOfLtOfLe h (Nat.predLe _)⟩ }
-- TODO(Leo): justify termination using wf-rec
partial def shrink : Array α → Nat → Array α
| a, n => if n ≥ a.size then a else shrink a.pop n
section
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variables {β : Type v} {σ : Type u}
-- TODO(Leo): justify termination using wf-rec
@[specialize] partial def iterateMAux (a : Array α) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a.size), α → β → m β) : Nat → β → m β
| i, b =>
if h : i < a.size then
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
f idx (a.get idx) b >>= iterateMAux (i+1)
else pure b
@[inline] def iterateM (a : Array α) (b : β) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a.size), α → β → m β) : m β :=
iterateMAux a f 0 b
@[inline] def foldlM (f : β → α → m β) (init : β) (a : Array α) : m β :=
iterateM a init (fun _ b a => f a b)
@[inline] def foldlFromM (f : β → α → m β) (init : β) (a : Array α) (beginIdx : Nat := 0) : m β :=
iterateMAux a (fun _ b a => f a b) beginIdx init
-- TODO(Leo): justify termination using wf-rec
@[specialize] partial def iterateM₂Aux (a₁ : Array α) (a₂ : Array σ) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a₁.size), α → σ → β → m β) : Nat → β → m β
| i, b =>
if h₁ : i < a₁.size then
let idx₁ : Fin a₁.size := ⟨i, h₁⟩;
if h₂ : i < a₂.size then
let idx₂ : Fin a₂.size := ⟨i, h₂⟩;
f idx₁ (a₁.get idx₁) (a₂.get idx₂) b >>= iterateM₂Aux (i+1)
else pure b
else pure b
@[inline] def iterateM₂ (a₁ : Array α) (a₂ : Array σ) (b : β) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a₁.size), α → σ → β → m β) : m β :=
iterateM₂Aux a₁ a₂ f 0 b
@[inline] def foldlM₂ (f : β → α → σ → m β) (b : β) (a₁ : Array α) (a₂ : Array σ): m β :=
iterateM₂ a₁ a₂ b (fun _ a₁ a₂ b => f b a₁ a₂)
@[specialize] partial def findSomeMAux (a : Array α) (f : α → m (Option β)) : Nat → m (Option β)
| i =>
if h : i < a.size then
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
do r ← f (a.get idx);
match r with
| some v => pure r
| none => findSomeMAux (i+1)
else pure none
@[inline] def findSomeM? (a : Array α) (f : α → m (Option β)) : m (Option β) :=
findSomeMAux a f 0
@[specialize] partial def findSomeRevMAux (a : Array α) (f : α → m (Option β)) : ∀ (idx : Nat), idx ≤ a.size → m (Option β)
| i, h =>
if hLt : 0 < i then
have i - 1 < i from Nat.subLt hLt (Nat.zeroLtSucc 0);
have i - 1 < a.size from Nat.ltOfLtOfLe this h;
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i - 1, this⟩;
do
r ← f (a.get idx);
match r with
| some v => pure r
| none =>
have i - 1 ≤ a.size from Nat.leOfLt this;
findSomeRevMAux (i-1) this
else pure none
@[inline] def findSomeRevM? (a : Array α) (f : α → m (Option β)) : m (Option β) :=
findSomeRevMAux a f a.size (Nat.leRefl _)
end
-- TODO(Leo): justify termination using wf-rec
@[specialize] partial def findMAux {α : Type} {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array α) (p : α → m Bool) : Nat → m (Option α)
| i =>
if h : i < a.size then do
let v := a.get ⟨i, h⟩;
condM (p v) (pure (some v)) (findMAux (i+1))
else pure none
@[inline] def findM? {α : Type} {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array α) (p : α → m Bool) : m (Option α) :=
findMAux a p 0
@[inline] def find? {α : Type} (a : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option α :=
Id.run $ a.findM? p
@[specialize] partial def findRevMAux {α : Type} {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array α) (p : α → m Bool) : ∀ (idx : Nat), idx ≤ a.size → m (Option α)
| i, h =>
if hLt : 0 < i then
have i - 1 < i from Nat.subLt hLt (Nat.zeroLtSucc 0);
have i - 1 < a.size from Nat.ltOfLtOfLe this h;
let v := a.get ⟨i - 1, this⟩;
do {
condM (p v) (pure (some v)) $
have i - 1 ≤ a.size from Nat.leOfLt this;
findRevMAux (i-1) this
}
else pure none
@[inline] def findRevM? {α : Type} {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array α) (p : α → m Bool) : m (Option α) :=
findRevMAux a p a.size (Nat.leRefl _)
@[inline] def findRev? {α : Type} (a : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option α :=
Id.run $ a.findRevM? p
section
variables {β : Type w} {σ : Type u}
@[inline] def iterate (a : Array α) (b : β) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a.size), α → β → β) : β :=
Id.run $ iterateMAux a f 0 b
@[inline] def iterateFrom (a : Array α) (b : β) (i : Nat) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a.size), α → β → β) : β :=
Id.run $ iterateMAux a f i b
@[inline] def foldl (f : β → α → β) (init : β) (a : Array α) : β :=
iterate a init (fun _ a b => f b a)
@[inline] def foldlFrom (f : β → α → β) (init : β) (a : Array α) (beginIdx : Nat := 0) : β :=
Id.run $ foldlFromM f init a beginIdx
@[inline] def iterate₂ (a₁ : Array α) (a₂ : Array σ) (b : β) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a₁.size), α → σ → β → β) : β :=
Id.run $ iterateM₂Aux a₁ a₂ f 0 b
@[inline] def foldl₂ (f : β → α → σ → β) (b : β) (a₁ : Array α) (a₂ : Array σ) : β :=
iterate₂ a₁ a₂ b (fun _ a₁ a₂ b => f b a₁ a₂)
@[inline] def findSome? (a : Array α) (f : α → Option β) : Option β :=
Id.run $ findSomeMAux a f 0
@[inline] def findSome! [Inhabited β] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option β) : β :=
match findSome? a f with
| some b => b
| none => panic! "failed to find element"
@[inline] def findSomeRev? (a : Array α) (f : α → Option β) : Option β :=
Id.run $ findSomeRevMAux a f a.size (Nat.leRefl _)
@[inline] def findSomeRev! [Inhabited β] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option β) : β :=
match findSomeRev? a f with
| some b => b
| none => panic! "failed to find element"
@[specialize] partial def findIdxMAux {m : Type → Type u} [Monad m] (a : Array α) (p : α → m Bool) : Nat → m (Option Nat)
| i =>
if h : i < a.size then
condM (p (a.get ⟨i, h⟩)) (pure (some i)) (findIdxMAux (i+1))
else
pure none
@[inline] def findIdxM? {m : Type → Type u} [Monad m] (a : Array α) (p : α → m Bool) : m (Option Nat) :=
findIdxMAux a p 0
@[specialize] partial def findIdxAux (a : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Nat → Option Nat
| i =>
if h : i < a.size then
if p (a.get ⟨i, h⟩) then some i else findIdxAux (i+1)
else
none
@[inline] def findIdx? (a : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option Nat :=
findIdxAux a p 0
@[inline] def findIdx! (a : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Nat :=
match findIdxAux a p 0 with
| some i => i
| none => panic! "failed to find element"
def getIdx? [HasBeq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option Nat :=
a.findIdx? $ fun a => a == v
end
section
variables {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m]
@[specialize] partial def anyRangeMAux (a : Array α) (endIdx : Nat) (hlt : endIdx ≤ a.size) (p : α → m Bool) : Nat → m Bool
| i =>
if h : i < endIdx then
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, Nat.ltOfLtOfLe h hlt⟩;
do b ← p (a.get idx);
match b with
| true => pure true
| false => anyRangeMAux (i+1)
else pure false
@[inline] def anyM (a : Array α) (p : α → m Bool) : m Bool :=
anyRangeMAux a a.size (Nat.leRefl _) p 0
@[inline] def allM (a : Array α) (p : α → m Bool) : m Bool := do
b ← anyM a (fun v => do b ← p v; pure (!b)); pure (!b)
@[inline] def anyRangeM (a : Array α) (beginIdx endIdx : Nat) (p : α → m Bool) : m Bool :=
if h : endIdx ≤ a.size then
anyRangeMAux a endIdx h p beginIdx
else
anyRangeMAux a a.size (Nat.leRefl _) p beginIdx
@[inline] def allRangeM (a : Array α) (beginIdx endIdx : Nat) (p : α → m Bool) : m Bool := do
b ← anyRangeM a beginIdx endIdx (fun v => do b ← p v; pure b); pure (!b)
end
@[inline] def any (a : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
Id.run $ anyM a p
@[inline] def anyRange (a : Array α) (beginIdx endIdx : Nat) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
Id.run $ anyRangeM a beginIdx endIdx p
@[inline] def anyFrom (a : Array α) (beginIdx : Nat) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
Id.run $ anyRangeM a beginIdx a.size p
@[inline] def all (a : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
!any a (fun v => !p v)
@[inline] def allRange (a : Array α) (beginIdx endIdx : Nat) (p : α → Bool) : Bool :=
!anyRange a beginIdx endIdx (fun v => !p v)
section
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable {β : Type v}
@[specialize] private def iterateRevMAux (a : Array α) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a.size), α → β → m β) : ∀ (i : Nat), i ≤ a.size → β → m β
| 0, h, b => pure b
| j+1, h, b => do
let i : Fin a.size := ⟨j, h⟩;
b ← f i (a.get i) b;
iterateRevMAux j (Nat.leOfLt h) b
@[inline] def iterateRevM (a : Array α) (b : β) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a.size), α → β → m β) : m β :=
iterateRevMAux a f a.size (Nat.leRefl _) b
@[inline] def foldrM (f : α → β → m β) (init : β) (a : Array α) : m β :=
iterateRevM a init (fun _ => f)
@[specialize] private def foldrRangeMAux (a : Array α) (f : α → β → m β) (beginIdx : Nat) : ∀ (i : Nat), i ≤ a.size → β → m β
| 0, h, b => pure b
| j+1, h, b => do
let i : Fin a.size := ⟨j, h⟩;
b ← f (a.get i) b;
if j == beginIdx then pure b else foldrRangeMAux j (Nat.leOfLt h) b
@[inline] def foldrRangeM (beginIdx endIdx : Nat) (f : α → β → m β) (ini : β) (a : Array α) : m β :=
if h : endIdx ≤ a.size then
foldrRangeMAux a f beginIdx endIdx h ini
else
foldrRangeMAux a f beginIdx a.size (Nat.leRefl _) ini
@[specialize] partial def foldlStepMAux (step : Nat) (a : Array α) (f : β → α → m β) : Nat → β → m β
| i, b =>
if h : i < a.size then do
let curr := a.get ⟨i, h⟩;
b ← f b curr;
foldlStepMAux (i+step) b
else
pure b
@[inline] def foldlStepM (f : β → α → m β) (init : β) (step : Nat) (a : Array α) : m β :=
foldlStepMAux step a f 0 init
end
@[inline] def iterateRev {β} (a : Array α) (b : β) (f : ∀ (i : Fin a.size), α → β → β) : β :=
Id.run $ iterateRevM a b f
@[inline] def foldr {β} (f : α → β → β) (init : β) (a : Array α) : β :=
Id.run $ foldrM f init a
@[inline] def foldrRange {β} (beginIdx endIdx : Nat) (f : α → β → β) (init : β) (a : Array α) : β :=
Id.run $ foldrRangeM beginIdx endIdx f init a
@[inline] def foldlStep {β} (f : β → α → β) (init : β) (step : Nat) (a : Array α) : β :=
Id.run $ foldlStepM f init step a
@[inline] def getEvenElems (a : Array α) : Array α :=
a.foldlStep (fun r a => Array.push r a) empty 2
def toList (a : Array α) : List α :=
a.foldr List.cons []
instance [HasRepr α] : HasRepr (Array α) :=
⟨fun a => "#" ++ repr a.toList⟩
instance [HasToString α] : HasToString (Array α) :=
⟨fun a => "#" ++ toString a.toList⟩
section
variables {m : Type u → Type w} [Monad m]
variable {β : Type u}
@[specialize] unsafe partial def umapMAux (f : Nat → α → m β) : Nat → Array α → m (Array β)
| i, a =>
if h : i < a.size then
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
let v : α := a.get idx;
let a := a.set idx (@unsafeCast _ _ ⟨v⟩ ());
do newV ← f i v; umapMAux (i+1) (a.set idx (@unsafeCast _ _ ⟨v⟩ newV))
else
pure (unsafeCast a)
@[inline] unsafe partial def umapM (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) : m (Array β) :=
umapMAux (fun i a => f a) 0 as
@[inline] unsafe partial def umapIdxM (f : Nat → α → m β) (as : Array α) : m (Array β) :=
umapMAux f 0 as
@[implementedBy Array.umapM] def mapM (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) : m (Array β) :=
as.foldlM (fun bs a => do b ← f a; pure (bs.push b)) (mkEmpty as.size)
@[implementedBy Array.umapIdxM] def mapIdxM (f : Nat → α → m β) (as : Array α) : m (Array β) :=
as.iterateM (mkEmpty as.size) (fun i a bs => do b ← f i.val a; pure (bs.push b))
end
section
variables {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m]
variable {β : Type u}
@[inline] def modifyM [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (f : α → m α) : m (Array α) :=
if h : i < a.size then do
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
let v := a.get idx;
let a := a.set idx (arbitrary α);
v ← f v;
pure $ (a.set idx v)
else
pure a
end
section
variable {β : Type u}
@[inline] def modify [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (f : α → α) : Array α :=
Id.run $ a.modifyM i f
@[inline] def modifyOp [Inhabited α] (self : Array α) (idx : Nat) (f : α → α) : Array α :=
self.modify idx f
@[inline] def mapIdx (f : Nat → α → β) (a : Array α) : Array β :=
Id.run $ mapIdxM f a
@[inline] def map (f : α → β) (as : Array α) : Array β :=
Id.run $ mapM f as
end
section
variables {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m]
variable {β : Type u}
@[specialize]
partial def forMAux {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) (a : Array α) : Nat → m PUnit
| i =>
if h : i < a.size then
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
let v : α := a.get idx;
do f v; forMAux (i+1)
else
pure ⟨⟩
@[inline] def forM {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) (a : Array α) : m PUnit :=
a.forMAux f 0
@[specialize]
partial def forRevMAux {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) (a : Array α) : forall (i : Nat), i ≤ a.size → m PUnit
| i, h =>
if hLt : 0 < i then
have i - 1 < i from Nat.subLt hLt (Nat.zeroLtSucc 0);
have i - 1 < a.size from Nat.ltOfLtOfLe this h;
let v : α := a.get ⟨i-1, this⟩;
have i - 1 ≤ a.size from Nat.leOfLt this;
do f v; forRevMAux (i-1) this
else
pure ⟨⟩
@[inline] def forRevM {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) (a : Array α) : m PUnit :=
a.forRevMAux f a.size (Nat.leRefl _)
end
-- TODO(Leo): justify termination using wf-rec
partial def extractAux (a : Array α) : Nat → ∀ (e : Nat), e ≤ a.size → Array α → Array α
| i, e, hle, r =>
if hlt : i < e then
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, Nat.ltOfLtOfLe hlt hle⟩;
extractAux (i+1) e hle (r.push (a.get idx))
else r
def extract (a : Array α) (b e : Nat) : Array α :=
let r : Array α := mkEmpty (e - b);
if h : e ≤ a.size then extractAux a b e h r
else r
protected def append (a : Array α) (b : Array α) : Array α :=
b.foldl (fun a v => a.push v) a
instance : HasAppend (Array α) := ⟨Array.append⟩
-- TODO(Leo): justify termination using wf-rec
@[specialize] partial def isEqvAux (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (p : α → α → Bool) : Nat → Bool
| i =>
if h : i < a.size then
let aidx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
let bidx : Fin b.size := ⟨i, hsz ▸ h⟩;
match p (a.get aidx) (b.get bidx) with
| true => isEqvAux (i+1)
| false => false
else
true
@[inline] def isEqv (a b : Array α) (p : α → α → Bool) : Bool :=
if h : a.size = b.size then
isEqvAux a b h p 0
else
false
instance [HasBeq α] : HasBeq (Array α) :=
⟨fun a b => isEqv a b HasBeq.beq⟩
-- TODO(Leo): justify termination using wf-rec, and use `swap`
partial def reverseAux : Array α → Nat → Array α
| a, i =>
let n := a.size;
if i < n / 2 then
reverseAux (a.swap! i (n - i - 1)) (i+1)
else
a
def reverse (a : Array α) : Array α :=
reverseAux a 0
-- TODO(Leo): justify termination using wf-rec
@[specialize] partial def filterAux (p : α → Bool) : Array α → Nat → Nat → Array α
| a, i, j =>
if h₁ : i < a.size then
if p (a.get ⟨i, h₁⟩) then
if h₂ : j < i then
filterAux (a.swap ⟨i, h₁⟩ ⟨j, Nat.ltTrans h₂ h₁⟩) (i+1) (j+1)
else
filterAux a (i+1) (j+1)
else
filterAux a (i+1) j
else
a.shrink j
@[inline] def filter (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
filterAux p as 0 0
@[specialize] partial def filterMAux {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] {α : Type} (p : α → m Bool) : Array α → Nat → Nat → m (Array α)
| a, i, j =>
if h₁ : i < a.size then
condM (p (a.get ⟨i, h₁⟩))
(if h₂ : j < i then
filterMAux (a.swap ⟨i, h₁⟩ ⟨j, Nat.ltTrans h₂ h₁⟩) (i+1) (j+1)
else
filterMAux a (i+1) (j+1))
(filterMAux a (i+1) j)
else
pure $ a.shrink j
@[inline] def filterM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] {α : Type} (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) : m (Array α) :=
filterMAux p as 0 0
partial def indexOfAux {α} [HasBeq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Nat → Option (Fin a.size)
| i =>
if h : i < a.size then
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
if a.get idx == v then some idx
else indexOfAux (i+1)
else none
def indexOf {α} [HasBeq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
indexOfAux a v 0
partial def eraseIdxAux {α} : Nat → Array α → Array α
| i, a =>
if h : i < a.size then
let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
let idx1 : Fin a.size := ⟨i - 1, Nat.ltOfLeOfLt (Nat.predLe i) h⟩;
eraseIdxAux (i+1) (a.swap idx idx1)
else
a.pop
def feraseIdx {α} (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
eraseIdxAux (i.val + 1) a
def eraseIdx {α} (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Array α :=
if i < a.size then eraseIdxAux (i+1) a else a
theorem szFSwapEq (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) : (a.swap i j).size = a.size :=
rfl
theorem szPopEq (a : Array α) : a.pop.size = a.size - 1 :=
rfl
section
/- Instance for justifying `partial` declaration.
We should be able to delete it as soon as we restore support for well-founded recursion. -/
instance eraseIdxSzAuxInstance (a : Array α) : Inhabited { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 } :=
⟨⟨a.pop, szPopEq a⟩⟩
partial def eraseIdxSzAux {α} (a : Array α) : ∀ (i : Nat) (r : Array α), r.size = a.size → { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 }
| i, r, heq =>
if h : i < r.size then
let idx : Fin r.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
let idx1 : Fin r.size := ⟨i - 1, Nat.ltOfLeOfLt (Nat.predLe i) h⟩;
eraseIdxSzAux (i+1) (r.swap idx idx1) ((szFSwapEq r idx idx1).trans heq)
else
⟨r.pop, (szPopEq r).trans (heq ▸ rfl)⟩
end
def eraseIdx' {α} (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 } :=
eraseIdxSzAux a (i.val + 1) a rfl
def contains [HasBeq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Bool :=
as.any $ fun b => a == b
def elem [HasBeq α] (a : α) (as : Array α) : Bool :=
as.contains a
partial def insertAtAux {α} (i : Nat) : Array α → Nat → Array α
| as, j =>
if i == j then as
else
let as := as.swap! (j-1) j;
insertAtAux as (j-1)
/--
Insert element `a` at position `i`.
Pre: `i < as.size` -/
def insertAt {α} (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (a : α) : Array α :=
if i > as.size then panic! "invalid index"
else
let as := as.push a;
as.insertAtAux i as.size
end Array
export Array (mkArray)
@[inlineIfReduce] def List.toArrayAux {α : Type u} : List α → Array α → Array α
| [], r => r
| a::as, r => List.toArrayAux as (r.push a)
@[inlineIfReduce] def List.redLength {α : Type u} : List α → Nat
| [] => 0
| _::as => as.redLength + 1
@[inline] def List.toArray {α : Type u} (as : List α) : Array α :=
as.toArrayAux (Array.mkEmpty as.redLength)
|
e79c73f954f57e6ace7545278019b64407bcba38 | 4fa118f6209450d4e8d058790e2967337811b2b5 | /src/examples/discrete.lean | 9245ffece5c92ec7e282de957efec8c45a094934 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean-perfectoid-spaces | 16ab697a220ed3669bf76311daa8c466382207f7 | 95a6520ce578b30a80b4c36e36ab2d559a842690 | refs/heads/master | 1,639,557,829,139 | 1,638,797,866,000 | 1,638,797,866,000 | 135,769,296 | 96 | 10 | Apache-2.0 | 1,638,797,866,000 | 1,527,892,754,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 497 | lean | import Huber_ring.basic
local attribute [instance] discrete_top_ring
/-- Chambert-Loir's lemma: a discrete ring is Huber. -/
lemma discrete_Huber_ring {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [topological_space A] [discrete_topology A] :
Huber_ring A :=
⟨⟨A, by assumption, by assumption, by apply_instance,
⟨{ emb := open_embedding_id,
J := ⊥,
fin := submodule.fg_bot,
top := is_bot_adic_iff.mpr ‹_›,
.. algebra.id A }⟩⟩⟩
|
f606a3491d3a8eb26cb167c3553e523c83b09071 | fcf3ffa92a3847189ca669cb18b34ef6b2ec2859 | /src/polyfill/mod.lean | 12d9986356f9c53a6cd9aaf848a259e15f64b4eb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | nomoid/lean-proofs | 4a80a97888699dee42b092b7b959b22d9aa0c066 | b9f03a24623d1a1d111d6c2bbf53c617e2596d6a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,955,317,080 | 1,607,475,706,000 | 1,607,475,706,000 | 314,104,281 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 805 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
/- excerpt of https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/blob/fee93e961d7b74a4b0ce9e454b8a960e48acc3b2/src/data/nat/basic.lean -/
namespace nat
@[simp] lemma one_mod (n : ℕ) : 1 % (n + 2) = 1 := nat.mod_eq_of_lt (add_lt_add_right n.succ_pos 1)
@[simp] theorem mod_add_mod (m n k : ℕ) : (m % n + k) % n = (m + k) % n :=
by have := (add_mul_mod_self_left (m % n + k) n (m / n)).symm;
rwa [add_right_comm, mod_add_div] at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_mod (m n k : ℕ) : (m + n % k) % k = (m + n) % k :=
by rw [add_comm, mod_add_mod, add_comm]
end nat
|
702df0ff415ed125c2ae5124c233c0718410c5a2 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/topology/algebra/ordered/proj_Icc.lean | 83fd0fb6099817b3c1244f41040d58170a8e5260 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,760 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.topology.algebra.ordered
import Mathlib.data.set.intervals.proj_Icc
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Projection onto a closed interval
In this file we prove that the projection `set.proj_Icc f a b h` is a quotient map, and use it
to show that `Icc_extend h f` is continuous if and only if `f` is continuous.
-/
theorem continuous_proj_Icc {α : Type u_1} [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α] {a : α} {b : α} {h : a ≤ b} : continuous (set.proj_Icc a b h) :=
continuous_subtype_mk (fun (x : α) => set.proj_Icc._proof_1 a b h x)
(continuous.max continuous_const (continuous.min continuous_const continuous_id))
theorem quotient_map_proj_Icc {α : Type u_1} [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α] {a : α} {b : α} {h : a ≤ b} : quotient_map (set.proj_Icc a b h) := sorry
@[simp] theorem continuous_Icc_extend_iff {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α] [topological_space β] {a : α} {b : α} {h : a ≤ b} {f : ↥(set.Icc a b) → β} : continuous (set.Icc_extend h f) ↔ continuous f :=
iff.symm (quotient_map.continuous_iff quotient_map_proj_Icc)
theorem continuous.Icc_extend {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α] [topological_space β] {a : α} {b : α} {h : a ≤ b} {f : ↥(set.Icc a b) → β} (hf : continuous f) : continuous (set.Icc_extend h f) :=
continuous.comp hf continuous_proj_Icc
|
2849e9c3139910541c88c17abd05700f9f98b4e8 | 351a46035517d2a1985619b8cabdf263754d343a | /src/ch14.lean | 12e725862b9f76b23bb10bb783681f0b2f55b40d | [] | no_license | kaychaks/logic_proof | accc212517b613caca92c10db77e6aaf6b7ccfbc | 90f3bf0acbabf558ba2f82dee968255d8bfe2de1 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,001,734,509 | 1,548,235,051,000 | 1,548,235,051,000 | 165,186,786 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,954 | lean |
---
section
parameters {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop}
parameter (irreflR : irreflexive R)
parameter (transR : transitive R)
local infix < := R
def R' (a b : A) : Prop := R a b ∨ a = b
local infix ≤ := R'
theorem reflR' (a : A) : a ≤ a := or.inr (refl a)
theorem transR' {a b c : A} (h1 : a ≤ b) (h2 : b ≤ c):
a ≤ c :=
or.elim h1
(assume : a < b,
show a ≤ c, from
or.elim h2
(assume : b < c, or.inl (transR ‹ a < b › ‹ b < c ›))
(assume : b = c, or.inl (eq.subst ‹ b = c › ‹ a < b ›)))
(assume : a = b,
show a ≤ c, from
or.elim h2
(assume : b < c, or.inl (eq.symm ‹ a = b › ▸ ‹ b < c ›))
(assume : b = c, or.inr (‹ b = c › ▸ ‹ a = b ›)))
theorem antisymmR' {a b : A} (h1 : a ≤ b) (h2 : b ≤ a) :
a = b :=
or.elim h1
(assume : a < b,
or.elim h2
(assume : b < a, have false, from (irreflR a) (transR ‹ a < b › ‹ b < a ›), ‹ false ›.elim)
(assume : b = a, eq.symm this)
)
(assume : a = b, eq.symm (eq.symm this))
end
---
section
parameters {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop}
parameter (reflR : reflexive R)
parameter (transR : transitive R)
def S (a b : A) : Prop := R a b ∧ R b a
example : transitive S :=
assume a b c,
assume h1 h2,
⟨ transR h1.left h2.left , transR h2.right h1.right ⟩
end
---
section
parameters {A : Type} {a b c : A} {R : A → A → Prop}
parameter (Rab : R a b)
parameter (Rbc : R b c)
parameter (nRac : ¬ R a c)
-- Prove one of the following two theorems:
theorem R_is_strict_partial_order :
irreflexive R ∧ transitive R :=
sorry
theorem R_is_not_strict_partial_order :
¬(irreflexive R ∧ transitive R) :=
assume h : irreflexive R ∧ transitive R,
show false, from
nRac (h.right Rab Rbc)
end
---
open nat
example : 1 ≤ 4 :=
le_succ_of_le $ le_succ_of_le $ le_succ 1 |
0c2f0a191e76ff02ceac52340250f6dbfa237d88 | 4950bf76e5ae40ba9f8491647d0b6f228ddce173 | /src/data/quaternion.lean | 77635e9f03df0961f0aceb0972ff83e391885be5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ntzwq/mathlib | ca50b21079b0a7c6781c34b62199a396dd00cee2 | 36eec1a98f22df82eaccd354a758ef8576af2a7f | refs/heads/master | 1,675,193,391,478 | 1,607,822,996,000 | 1,607,822,996,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,045 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import tactic.ring_exp
import algebra.algebra.basic
import algebra.opposites
import data.equiv.ring
/-!
# Quaternions
In this file we define quaternions `ℍ[R]` over a commutative ring `R`, and define some
algebraic structures on `ℍ[R]`.
## Main definitions
* `quaternion_algebra R a b`, `ℍ[R, a, b]` :
[quaternion algebra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion_algebra) with coefficients `a`, `b`
* `quaternion R`, `ℍ[R]` : the space of quaternions, a.k.a. `quaternion_algebra R (-1) (-1)`;
* `quaternion.norm_sq` : square of the norm of a quaternion;
* `quaternion.conj` : conjugate of a quaternion;
We also define the following algebraic structures on `ℍ[R]`:
* `ring ℍ[R, a, b]` and `algebra R ℍ[R, a, b]` : for any commutative ring `R`;
* `ring ℍ[R]` and `algebra R ℍ[R]` : for any commutative ring `R`;
* `domain ℍ[R]` : for a linear ordered commutative ring `R`;
* `division_algebra ℍ[R]` : for a linear ordered field `R`.
## Notation
The following notation is available with `open_locale quaternion`.
* `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]` : `quaternion_algebra R c₁ c₂`
* `ℍ[R]` : quaternions over `R`.
## Implementation notes
We define quaternions over any ring `R`, not just `ℝ` to be able to deal with, e.g., integer
or rational quaternions without using real numbers. In particular, all definitions in this file
are computable.
## Tags
quaternion
-/
/-- Quaternion algebra over a type with fixed coefficients $a=i^2$ and $b=j^2$.
Implemented as a structure with four fields: `re`, `im_i`, `im_j`, and `im_k`. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments, ext]
structure quaternion_algebra (R : Type*) (a b : R) :=
mk {} :: (re : R) (im_i : R) (im_j : R) (im_k : R)
localized "notation `ℍ[` R`,` a`,` b `]` := quaternion_algebra R a b" in quaternion
namespace quaternion_algebra
@[simp] lemma mk.eta {R : Type*} {c₁ c₂} : ∀ a : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂], mk a.1 a.2 a.3 a.4 = a
| ⟨a₁, a₂, a₃, a₄⟩ := rfl
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {c₁ c₂ : R} (r x y z : R) (a b c : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂])
instance : has_coe_t R (ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) := ⟨λ x, ⟨x, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_re : (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]).re = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_im_i : (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]).im_i = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_im_j : (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]).im_j = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_im_k : (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]).im_k = 0 := rfl
lemma coe_injective : function.injective (coe : R → ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) :=
λ x y h, congr_arg re h
@[simp] lemma coe_inj {x y : R} : (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = y ↔ x = y := coe_injective.eq_iff
@[simps] instance : has_zero ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] := ⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : R) : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = 0 := rfl
instance : inhabited ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] := ⟨0⟩
@[simps] instance : has_one ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] := ⟨⟨1, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : R) : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = 1 := rfl
@[simps] instance : has_add ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨a.1 + b.1, a.2 + b.2, a.3 + b.3, a.4 + b.4⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_add_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) + mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ = mk (a₁ + b₁) (a₂ + b₂) (a₃ + b₃) (a₄ + b₄) :=
rfl
@[simps] instance : has_neg ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] := ⟨λ a, ⟨-a.1, -a.2, -a.3, -a.4⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : R) : -(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = ⟨-a₁, -a₂, -a₃, -a₄⟩ :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication is given by
* `1 * x = x * 1 = x`;
* `i * i = c₁`;
* `j * j = c₂`;
* `i * j = k`, `j * i = -k`;
* `k * k = -c₁ * c₂`;
* `i * k = c₁ * j`, `k * i = `-c₁ * j`;
* `j * k = -c₂ * i`, `k * j = c₂ * i`. -/
@[simps] instance : has_mul ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] := ⟨λ a b,
⟨a.1 * b.1 + c₁ * a.2 * b.2 + c₂ * a.3 * b.3 - c₁ * c₂ * a.4 * b.4,
a.1 * b.2 + a.2 * b.1 - c₂ * a.3 * b.4 + c₂ * a.4 * b.3,
a.1 * b.3 + c₁ * a.2 * b.4 + a.3 * b.1 - c₁ * a.4 * b.2,
a.1 * b.4 + a.2 * b.3 - a.3 * b.2 + a.4 * b.1⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_mul_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) * mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
⟨a₁ * b₁ + c₁ * a₂ * b₂ + c₂ * a₃ * b₃ - c₁ * c₂ * a₄ * b₄,
a₁ * b₂ + a₂ * b₁ - c₂ * a₃ * b₄ + c₂ * a₄ * b₃,
a₁ * b₃ + c₁ * a₂ * b₄ + a₃ * b₁ - c₁ * a₄ * b₂,
a₁ * b₄ + a₂ * b₃ - a₃ * b₂ + a₄ * b₁⟩ := rfl
instance : ring ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] :=
by refine_struct
{ add := (+), zero := (0 : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]), neg := has_neg.neg, mul := (*), one := 1 };
intros; ext; simp; ring_exp
@[simp] lemma mk_sub_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) - mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ = mk (a₁ - b₁) (a₂ - b₂) (a₃ - b₃) (a₄ - b₄) :=
rfl
instance : algebra R ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] :=
{ smul := λ r a, ⟨r * a.1, r * a.2, r * a.3, r * a.4⟩,
to_fun := coe,
map_one' := rfl,
map_zero' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ x y, by ext; simp,
map_add' := λ x y, by ext; simp,
smul_def' := λ r x, by ext; simp,
commutes' := λ r x, by ext; simp [mul_comm] }
@[simp] lemma smul_re : (r • a).re = r • a.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_im_i : (r • a).im_i = r • a.im_i := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_im_j : (r • a).im_j = r • a.im_j := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_im_k : (r • a).im_k = r • a.im_k := rfl
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_add : ((x + y : R) : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = x + y :=
(algebra_map R ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]).map_add x y
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_sub : ((x - y : R) : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = x - y :=
(algebra_map R ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]).map_sub x y
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_neg : ((-x : R) : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = -x :=
(algebra_map R ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]).map_neg x
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_mul : ((x * y : R) : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = x * y :=
(algebra_map R ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]).map_mul x y
lemma coe_commutes : ↑r * a = a * r := algebra.commutes r a
lemma coe_commute : commute ↑r a := coe_commutes r a
lemma coe_mul_eq_smul : ↑r * a = r • a := (algebra.smul_def r a).symm
lemma mul_coe_eq_smul : a * r = r • a :=
by rw [← coe_commutes, coe_mul_eq_smul]
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_algebra_map : ⇑(algebra_map R ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = coe := rfl
lemma smul_coe : x • (y : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = ↑(x * y) := by rw [coe_mul, coe_mul_eq_smul]
/-- Quaternion conjugate. -/
def conj : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] ≃ₗ[R] ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] :=
linear_equiv.of_involutive
{ to_fun := λ a, ⟨a.1, -a.2, -a.3, -a.4⟩,
map_add' := λ a b, by ext; simp [neg_add],
map_smul' := λ r a, by ext; simp } $
λ a, by simp
@[simp] lemma re_conj : (conj a).re = a.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_i_conj : (conj a).im_i = - a.im_i := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_j_conj : (conj a).im_j = - a.im_j := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_k_conj : (conj a).im_k = - a.im_k := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_conj : a.conj.conj = a := ext _ _ rfl (neg_neg _) (neg_neg _) (neg_neg _)
lemma conj_add : (a + b).conj = a.conj + b.conj := conj.map_add a b
@[simp] lemma conj_mul : (a * b).conj = b.conj * a.conj := by ext; simp; ring_exp
lemma conj_conj_mul : (a.conj * b).conj = b.conj * a :=
by rw [conj_mul, conj_conj]
lemma conj_mul_conj : (a * b.conj).conj = b * a.conj :=
by rw [conj_mul, conj_conj]
lemma self_add_conj' : a + a.conj = ↑(2 * a.re) := by ext; simp [two_mul]
lemma self_add_conj : a + a.conj = 2 * a.re :=
by simp only [self_add_conj', two_mul, coe_add]
lemma conj_add_self' : a.conj + a = ↑(2 * a.re) := by rw [add_comm, self_add_conj']
lemma conj_add_self : a.conj + a = 2 * a.re := by rw [add_comm, self_add_conj]
lemma conj_eq_two_re_sub : a.conj = ↑(2 * a.re) - a := eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 a.conj_add_self'
lemma commute_conj_self : commute a.conj a :=
begin
rw [a.conj_eq_two_re_sub],
exact (coe_commute (2 * a.re) a).sub_left (commute.refl a)
end
lemma commute_self_conj : commute a a.conj :=
a.commute_conj_self.symm
lemma commute_conj_conj {a b : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]} (h : commute a b) : commute a.conj b.conj :=
calc a.conj * b.conj = (b * a).conj : (conj_mul b a).symm
... = (a * b).conj : by rw h.eq
... = b.conj * a.conj : conj_mul a b
@[simp] lemma conj_coe : conj (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = x := by ext; simp
lemma conj_smul : conj (r • a) = r • conj a := conj.map_smul r a
@[simp] lemma conj_one : conj (1 : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = 1 := conj_coe 1
lemma eq_re_of_eq_coe {a : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]} {x : R} (h : a = x) : a = a.re :=
by rw [h, coe_re]
lemma eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe {a : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]} :
a = a.re ↔ a ∈ set.range (coe : R → ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨a.re, h.symm⟩, λ ⟨x, h⟩, eq_re_of_eq_coe h.symm⟩
@[simp]
lemma conj_fixed {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] [char_zero R] {c₁ c₂ : R} {a : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]} :
conj a = a ↔ a = a.re :=
by simp [ext_iff, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero]
-- Can't use `rw ← conj_fixed` in the proof without additional assumptions
lemma conj_mul_eq_coe : conj a * a = (conj a * a).re := by ext; simp; ring_exp
lemma mul_conj_eq_coe : a * conj a = (a * conj a).re :=
by { rw a.commute_self_conj.eq, exact a.conj_mul_eq_coe }
lemma conj_zero : conj (0 : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) = 0 := conj.map_zero
lemma conj_neg : (-a).conj = -a.conj := (conj : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] ≃ₗ[R] _).map_neg a
lemma conj_sub : (a - b).conj = a.conj - b.conj := (conj : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] ≃ₗ[R] _).map_sub a b
instance : star_ring ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] :=
{ star := conj,
star_involutive := conj_conj,
star_add := conj_add,
star_mul := conj_mul }
@[simp] lemma star_def (a : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]) : star a = conj a := rfl
open opposite
/-- Quaternion conjugate as an `alg_equiv` to the opposite ring. -/
def conj_alg_equiv : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] ≃ₐ[R] (ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]ᵒᵖ) :=
{ to_fun := op ∘ conj,
inv_fun := conj ∘ unop,
map_mul' := λ x y, by simp,
commutes' := λ r, by simp,
.. conj.to_add_equiv.trans op_add_equiv }
@[simp] lemma coe_conj_alg_equiv : ⇑(conj_alg_equiv : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂] ≃ₐ[R] _) = op ∘ conj := rfl
end quaternion_algebra
/-- Space of quaternions over a type. Implemented as a structure with four fields:
`re`, `im_i`, `im_j`, and `im_k`. -/
def quaternion (R : Type*) [has_one R] [has_neg R] := quaternion_algebra R (-1) (-1)
localized "notation `ℍ[` R `]` := quaternion R" in quaternion
namespace quaternion
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] (r x y z : R) (a b c : ℍ[R])
export quaternion_algebra (re im_i im_j im_k)
instance : has_coe_t R ℍ[R] := quaternion_algebra.has_coe_t
instance : ring ℍ[R] := quaternion_algebra.ring
instance : inhabited ℍ[R] := quaternion_algebra.inhabited
instance : algebra R ℍ[R] := quaternion_algebra.algebra
instance : star_ring ℍ[R] := quaternion_algebra.star_ring
@[ext] lemma ext : a.re = b.re → a.im_i = b.im_i → a.im_j = b.im_j → a.im_k = b.im_k → a = b :=
quaternion_algebra.ext a b
lemma ext_iff {a b : ℍ[R]} :
a = b ↔ a.re = b.re ∧ a.im_i = b.im_i ∧ a.im_j = b.im_j ∧ a.im_k = b.im_k :=
quaternion_algebra.ext_iff a b
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_re : (x : ℍ[R]).re = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_im_i : (x : ℍ[R]).im_i = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_im_j : (x : ℍ[R]).im_j = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_im_k : (x : ℍ[R]).im_k = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_re : (0 : ℍ[R]).re = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_im_i : (0 : ℍ[R]).im_i = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_im_j : (0 : ℍ[R]).im_j = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_im_k : (0 : ℍ[R]).im_k = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : R) : ℍ[R]) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_re : (1 : ℍ[R]).re = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_im_i : (1 : ℍ[R]).im_i = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_im_j : (1 : ℍ[R]).im_j = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_im_k : (1 : ℍ[R]).im_k = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : R) : ℍ[R]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_re : (a + b).re = a.re + b.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_im_i : (a + b).im_i = a.im_i + b.im_i := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_im_j : (a + b).im_j = a.im_j + b.im_j := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_im_k : (a + b).im_k = a.im_k + b.im_k := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : ((x + y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x + y := quaternion_algebra.coe_add x y
@[simp] lemma neg_re : (-a).re = -a.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_im_i : (-a).im_i = -a.im_i := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_im_j : (-a).im_j = -a.im_j := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_im_k : (-a).im_k = -a.im_k := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg : ((-x : R) : ℍ[R]) = -x := quaternion_algebra.coe_neg x
@[simp] lemma sub_re : (a - b).re = a.re - b.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_im_i : (a - b).im_i = a.im_i - b.im_i := rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_im_j : (a - b).im_j = a.im_j - b.im_j := rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_im_k : (a - b).im_k = a.im_k - b.im_k := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : ((x - y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x - y := quaternion_algebra.coe_sub x y
@[simp] lemma mul_re :
(a * b).re = a.re * b.re - a.im_i * b.im_i - a.im_j * b.im_j - a.im_k * b.im_k :=
(quaternion_algebra.has_mul_mul_re a b).trans $
by simp only [one_mul, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma mul_im_i :
(a * b).im_i = a.re * b.im_i + a.im_i * b.re + a.im_j * b.im_k - a.im_k * b.im_j :=
(quaternion_algebra.has_mul_mul_im_i a b).trans $
by simp only [one_mul, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma mul_im_j :
(a * b).im_j = a.re * b.im_j - a.im_i * b.im_k + a.im_j * b.re + a.im_k * b.im_i :=
(quaternion_algebra.has_mul_mul_im_j a b).trans $
by simp only [one_mul, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma mul_im_k :
(a * b).im_k = a.re * b.im_k + a.im_i * b.im_j - a.im_j * b.im_i + a.im_k * b.re :=
(quaternion_algebra.has_mul_mul_im_k a b).trans $
by simp only [one_mul, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul : ((x * y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x * y := quaternion_algebra.coe_mul x y
lemma coe_injective : function.injective (coe : R → ℍ[R]) := quaternion_algebra.coe_injective
@[simp] lemma coe_inj {x y : R} : (x : ℍ[R]) = y ↔ x = y := coe_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma smul_re : (r • a).re = r • a.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_im_i : (r • a).im_i = r • a.im_i := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_im_j : (r • a).im_j = r • a.im_j := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_im_k : (r • a).im_k = r • a.im_k := rfl
lemma coe_commutes : ↑r * a = a * r := quaternion_algebra.coe_commutes r a
lemma coe_commute : commute ↑r a := quaternion_algebra.coe_commute r a
lemma coe_mul_eq_smul : ↑r * a = r • a := quaternion_algebra.coe_mul_eq_smul r a
lemma mul_coe_eq_smul : a * r = r • a := quaternion_algebra.mul_coe_eq_smul r a
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_def : ⇑(algebra_map R ℍ[R]) = coe := rfl
lemma smul_coe : x • (y : ℍ[R]) = ↑(x * y) := quaternion_algebra.smul_coe x y
/-- Quaternion conjugate. -/
def conj : ℍ[R] ≃ₗ[R] ℍ[R] := quaternion_algebra.conj
@[simp] lemma conj_re : a.conj.re = a.re := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_im_i : a.conj.im_i = - a.im_i := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_im_j : a.conj.im_j = - a.im_j := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_im_k : a.conj.im_k = - a.im_k := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_conj : a.conj.conj = a := a.conj_conj
@[simp] lemma conj_add : (a + b).conj = a.conj + b.conj := a.conj_add b
@[simp] lemma conj_mul : (a * b).conj = b.conj * a.conj := a.conj_mul b
lemma conj_conj_mul : (a.conj * b).conj = b.conj * a := a.conj_conj_mul b
lemma conj_mul_conj : (a * b.conj).conj = b * a.conj := a.conj_mul_conj b
lemma self_add_conj' : a + a.conj = ↑(2 * a.re) := a.self_add_conj'
lemma self_add_conj : a + a.conj = 2 * a.re := a.self_add_conj
lemma conj_add_self' : a.conj + a = ↑(2 * a.re) := a.conj_add_self'
lemma conj_add_self : a.conj + a = 2 * a.re := a.conj_add_self
lemma conj_eq_two_re_sub : a.conj = ↑(2 * a.re) - a := a.conj_eq_two_re_sub
lemma commute_conj_self : commute a.conj a := a.commute_conj_self
lemma commute_self_conj : commute a a.conj := a.commute_self_conj
lemma commute_conj_conj {a b : ℍ[R]} (h : commute a b) : commute a.conj b.conj :=
quaternion_algebra.commute_conj_conj h
alias commute_conj_conj ← commute.quaternion_conj
@[simp] lemma conj_coe : conj (x : ℍ[R]) = x := quaternion_algebra.conj_coe x
@[simp] lemma conj_smul : conj (r • a) = r • conj a := a.conj_smul r
@[simp] lemma conj_one : conj (1 : ℍ[R]) = 1 := conj_coe 1
lemma eq_re_of_eq_coe {a : ℍ[R]} {x : R} (h : a = x) : a = a.re :=
quaternion_algebra.eq_re_of_eq_coe h
lemma eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe {a : ℍ[R]} : a = a.re ↔ a ∈ set.range (coe : R → ℍ[R]) :=
quaternion_algebra.eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe
@[simp] lemma conj_fixed {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] [char_zero R] {a : ℍ[R]} :
conj a = a ↔ a = a.re :=
quaternion_algebra.conj_fixed
lemma conj_mul_eq_coe : conj a * a = (conj a * a).re := a.conj_mul_eq_coe
lemma mul_conj_eq_coe : a * conj a = (a * conj a).re := a.mul_conj_eq_coe
@[simp] lemma conj_zero : conj (0:ℍ[R]) = 0 := quaternion_algebra.conj_zero
@[simp] lemma conj_neg : (-a).conj = -a.conj := a.conj_neg
@[simp] lemma conj_sub : (a - b).conj = a.conj - b.conj := a.conj_sub b
open opposite
/-- Quaternion conjugate as an `alg_equiv` to the opposite ring. -/
def conj_alg_equiv : ℍ[R] ≃ₐ[R] (ℍ[R]ᵒᵖ) := quaternion_algebra.conj_alg_equiv
@[simp] lemma coe_conj_alg_equiv : ⇑(conj_alg_equiv : ℍ[R] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R]ᵒᵖ) = op ∘ conj := rfl
/-- Square of the norm. -/
def norm_sq : monoid_with_zero_hom ℍ[R] R :=
{ to_fun := λ a, (a * a.conj).re,
map_zero' := by rw [conj_zero, zero_mul, zero_re],
map_one' := by rw [conj_one, one_mul, one_re],
map_mul' := λ x y, coe_injective $ by conv_lhs { rw [← mul_conj_eq_coe, conj_mul, mul_assoc,
← mul_assoc y, y.mul_conj_eq_coe, coe_commutes, ← mul_assoc, x.mul_conj_eq_coe, ← coe_mul] } }
lemma norm_sq_def : norm_sq a = (a * a.conj).re := rfl
lemma norm_sq_def' : norm_sq a = a.1^2 + a.2^2 + a.3^2 + a.4^2 :=
by simp only [norm_sq_def, pow_two, ← neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, sub_neg_eq_add,
mul_re, conj_re, conj_im_i, conj_im_j, conj_im_k]
lemma norm_sq_coe : norm_sq (x : ℍ[R]) = x^2 :=
by rw [norm_sq_def, conj_coe, ← coe_mul, coe_re, pow_two]
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_neg : norm_sq (-a) = norm_sq a :=
by simp only [norm_sq_def, conj_neg, neg_mul_neg]
lemma self_mul_conj : a * a.conj = norm_sq a := by rw [mul_conj_eq_coe, norm_sq_def]
lemma conj_mul_self : a.conj * a = norm_sq a := by rw [← a.commute_self_conj.eq, self_mul_conj]
lemma coe_norm_sq_add :
(norm_sq (a + b) : ℍ[R]) = norm_sq a + a * b.conj + b * a.conj + norm_sq b :=
by simp [← self_mul_conj, mul_add, add_mul, add_assoc]
end quaternion
namespace quaternion
variables {R : Type*}
section linear_ordered_comm_ring
variables [linear_ordered_comm_ring R] {a : ℍ[R]}
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_eq_zero : norm_sq a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, h.symm ▸ norm_sq.map_zero⟩,
rw [norm_sq_def', add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_nonneg, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_nonneg,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_nonneg] at h,
exact ext a 0 (pow_eq_zero h.1.1.1) (pow_eq_zero h.1.1.2) (pow_eq_zero h.1.2) (pow_eq_zero h.2),
all_goals { apply_rules [pow_two_nonneg, add_nonneg] }
end
lemma norm_sq_ne_zero : norm_sq a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := not_congr norm_sq_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_nonneg : 0 ≤ norm_sq a :=
by { rw norm_sq_def', apply_rules [pow_two_nonneg, add_nonneg] }
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_le_zero : norm_sq a ≤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, norm_sq_nonneg, and_true] using @norm_sq_eq_zero _ _ a
instance : domain ℍ[R] :=
{ exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, mt (congr_arg re) zero_ne_one⟩,
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ a b hab,
have norm_sq a * norm_sq b = 0, by rwa [← norm_sq.map_mul, norm_sq_eq_zero],
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).imp norm_sq_eq_zero.1 norm_sq_eq_zero.1,
.. quaternion.ring }
end linear_ordered_comm_ring
section field
variables [linear_ordered_field R] (a b : ℍ[R])
@[simps { attrs := [] }]instance : has_inv ℍ[R] := ⟨λ a, (norm_sq a)⁻¹ • a.conj⟩
instance : division_ring ℍ[R] :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
inv_zero := by rw [has_inv_inv, conj_zero, smul_zero],
inv_mul_cancel := λ a ha, by rw [has_inv_inv, algebra.smul_mul_assoc, conj_mul_self, smul_coe,
inv_mul_cancel (norm_sq_ne_zero.2 ha), coe_one],
mul_inv_cancel := λ a ha, by rw [has_inv_inv, algebra.mul_smul_comm, self_mul_conj, smul_coe,
inv_mul_cancel (norm_sq_ne_zero.2 ha), coe_one],
.. quaternion.domain }
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_inv : norm_sq a⁻¹ = (norm_sq a)⁻¹ :=
monoid_with_zero_hom.map_inv' norm_sq _
@[simp] lemma norm_sq_div : norm_sq (a / b) = norm_sq a / norm_sq b :=
monoid_with_zero_hom.map_div norm_sq a b
end field
end quaternion
|
64624545f853144452f118df43f56603d80b5237 | 88fb7558b0636ec6b181f2a548ac11ad3919f8a5 | /library/init/data/list/lemmas.lean | a021ba22a2268f23c8f2043d035ca3d7749cb454 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | moritayasuaki/lean | 9f666c323cb6fa1f31ac597d777914aed41e3b7a | ae96ebf6ee953088c235ff7ae0e8c95066ba8001 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,135,440,814 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 90,269,903 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,493,906,291,000 | 1,493,906,291,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,133 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn
-/
prelude
import init.data.list.basic init.function init.meta init.data.nat.lemmas
import init.meta.interactive init.meta.smt.rsimp
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace list
open nat
/- append -/
@[simp] lemma nil_append (s : list α) : [] ++ s = s :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_append (x : α) (s t : list α) : (x::s) ++ t = x::(s ++ t) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma append_nil (t : list α) : t ++ [] = t :=
by induction t; simph
@[simp] lemma append_assoc (s t u : list α) : s ++ t ++ u = s ++ (t ++ u) :=
by induction s; simph
lemma append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ nil :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
lemma append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ nil :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
/- concat -/
@[simp] lemma concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simph [concat]
/- head & tail -/
attribute [simp] head tail
@[simp] lemma head_append [h : inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) : head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, simp}
lemma cons_head_tail [h : inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
by {induction l, contradiction, simp}
/- repeat taken dropn -/
attribute [simp] repeat taken dropn
/- length -/
attribute [simp] length
lemma length_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : length (a :: l) = length l + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma length_append (s t : list α) : length (s ++ t) = length s + length t :=
by induction s; simph
lemma length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp [succ_eq_add_one]
@[simp] lemma length_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : length (repeat a n) = n :=
by induction n; simph; refl
lemma eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 → l = [] :=
by {induction l; intros, refl, contradiction}
lemma ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ {l : list α} : ∀ {n : nat}, length l = succ n → l ≠ [] :=
by induction l; intros; contradiction
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
@[simp] lemma length_taken : ∀ (i : ℕ) (l : list α), length (taken i l) = min i (length l)
| 0 l := by simp
| (succ n) [] := by simp
| (succ n) (a::l) := begin simph [nat.min_succ_succ, add_one_eq_succ] end
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
@[simp] lemma length_dropn : ∀ (i : ℕ) (l : list α), length (dropn i l) = length l - i
| 0 l := rfl
| (succ i) [] := eq.symm (nat.zero_sub_eq_zero (succ i))
| (succ i) (x::l) := calc
length (dropn (succ i) (x::l))
= length l - i : length_dropn i l
... = succ (length l) - succ i : nat.sub_eq_succ_sub_succ (length l) i
/- map -/
attribute [simp] map
lemma map_cons (f : α → β) (a l) : map f (a::l) = f a :: map f l :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_append (f : α → β) : ∀ l₁ l₂, map f (l₁ ++ l₂) = (map f l₁) ++ (map f l₂) :=
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; simph
lemma map_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f [a] = [f a] :=
rfl
lemma map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; simph
@[simp] lemma map_id (l : list α) : map id l = l :=
by induction l; simph
lemma map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; simph
@[simp] lemma map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map g (map f l) = map (g ∘ f) l :=
by induction l; simph
@[simp] lemma length_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) : length (map f l) = length l :=
by induction l; simph
/- map₂ -/
attribute [simp] map₂
@[simp] lemma length_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l₁) : ∀ l₂, length (map₂ f l₁ l₂) = min (length l₁) (length l₂) :=
by {induction l₁; intro l₂; cases l₂; simph [add_one_eq_succ, min_succ_succ]}
/- reverse -/
@[simp] lemma reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] lemma reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ (concat l₂ a) = concat (reverse_core l₁ l₂) a,
by intros l₁; induction l₁; intros; rsimp,
aux l nil
@[simp] lemma reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; simph
@[simp] lemma reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; simph
lemma concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by induction l; simph
@[simp] lemma length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; simph
@[simp] lemma map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; simph
/- last -/
attribute [simp] last
@[simp] lemma last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : ∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, simph, reflexivity}
@[simp] lemma last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih; rsimp,
assert haux : tl ++ [a] ≠ [],
{apply append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right, contradiction},
simph
end
lemma last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simph
/- nth -/
attribute [simp] nth
lemma nth_succ (a : α) (l : list α) (n : nat) : nth (a::l) (nat.succ n) = nth l n :=
rfl
/- mem -/
@[simp] lemma mem_nil_iff (a : α) : a ∈ ([] : list α) ↔ false :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ ([] : list α) :=
iff.mp $ mem_nil_iff a
@[simp] lemma mem_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ a :: l :=
or.inl rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_cons_iff (a y : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ y :: l ↔ (a = y ∨ a ∈ l) :=
iff.rfl
@[rsimp] lemma mem_cons_eq (a y : α) (l : list α) : (a ∈ y :: l) = (a = y ∨ a ∈ l) :=
rfl
lemma eq_nil_of_forall_not_mem : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a, a ∉ l) → l = nil
| [] := assume h, rfl
| (b :: l') := assume h, absurd (mem_cons_self b l') (h b)
lemma mem_cons_of_mem (y : α) {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l → a ∈ y :: l :=
assume H, or.inr H
lemma eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ y::l → a = y ∨ a ∈ l :=
assume h, h
lemma mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
suppose a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = b, this)
(suppose a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] lemma mem_singleton_iff (a b : α) : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro mem_singleton (begin intro h, simp [h] end)
lemma mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(suppose a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(suppose a ∈ l, this)
lemma mem_or_mem_of_mem_append {a : α} : ∀ {s t : list α}, a ∈ s ++ t → a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t
| [] t h := or.inr h
| (b::s) t h :=
have a = b ∨ a ∈ s ++ t, from h,
match this with
| or.inl h₁ := or.inl (h₁ ▸ mem_cons_self _ _)
| or.inr h₁ :=
have a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t, from mem_or_mem_of_mem_append h₁,
match this with
| or.inl h₂ := or.inl (mem_cons_of_mem _ h₂)
| or.inr h₂ := or.inr h₂
end
end
lemma mem_append_of_mem_or_mem {a : α} {s t : list α} : a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t → a ∈ s ++ t :=
list.rec_on s
(take h, or.elim h false.elim id)
(take b s,
assume ih : a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t → a ∈ s ++ t,
suppose a ∈ b::s ∨ a ∈ t,
or.elim this
(suppose a ∈ b::s,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = b, or.inl this)
(suppose a ∈ s, or.inr (ih (or.inl this))))
(suppose a ∈ t, or.inr (ih (or.inr this))))
@[simp] lemma mem_append_iff (a : α) (s t : list α) : a ∈ s ++ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
iff.intro mem_or_mem_of_mem_append mem_append_of_mem_or_mem
@[rsimp] lemma mem_append_eq (a : α) (s t : list α) : (a ∈ s ++ t) = (a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t) :=
propext $ mem_append_iff a s t
lemma not_mem_of_not_mem_append_left {a : α} {s t : list α} : a ∉ s++t → a ∉ s :=
λ nainst ains, absurd (mem_append_of_mem_or_mem (or.inl ains)) nainst
lemma not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right {a : α} {s t : list α} : a ∉ s++t → a ∉ t :=
λ nainst aint, absurd (mem_append_of_mem_or_mem (or.inr aint)) nainst
lemma not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} : a ∉ s → a ∉ t → a ∉ s++t :=
λ nains naint ainst, or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append ainst)
(λ ains, by contradiction)
(λ aint, by contradiction)
lemma length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| [] := suppose a ∈ [], begin simp at this, contradiction end
| (b::l) := suppose a ∈ b::l, nat.zero_lt_succ _
lemma mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l → ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ (a::t) :=
list.rec_on l
(suppose a ∈ [], begin simp at this, contradiction end)
(take b l,
assume ih : a ∈ l → ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ (a::t),
suppose a ∈ b::l,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose a = b, ⟨[], l, begin rw this, reflexivity end⟩)
(suppose a ∈ l,
match (ih this) with
| ⟨s, t, (h : l = s ++ (a::t))⟩ := ⟨b::s, t, begin rw h, reflexivity end⟩
end))
lemma mem_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
assume ainl₁, mem_append_of_mem_or_mem (or.inl ainl₁)
lemma mem_append_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
assume ainl₂, mem_append_of_mem_or_mem (or.inr ainl₂)
lemma mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
lemma ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
lemma not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
lemma not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
lemma ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
/- sublists -/
def sublist (l₁ l₂ : list α) := ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂
instance : has_subset (list α) := ⟨sublist⟩
@[simp] lemma nil_subset (l : list α) : [] ⊆ l :=
λ b i, false.elim (iff.mp (mem_nil_iff b) i)
@[simp] lemma subset.refl (l : list α) : l ⊆ l :=
λ b i, i
lemma subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
λ b i, h₂ (h₁ i)
@[simp] lemma subset_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l ⊆ a::l :=
λ b i, or.inr i
lemma subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ s b i, s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
lemma cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : (a::l₁) ⊆ (a::l₂) :=
λ b hin, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons hin)
(λ e : b = a, or.inl e)
(λ i : b ∈ l₁, or.inr (s i))
@[simp] lemma subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ b i, iff.mpr (mem_append_iff b l₁ l₂) (or.inl i)
@[simp] lemma subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ b i, iff.mpr (mem_append_iff b l₁ l₂) (or.inr i)
lemma subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ (a::l₂) :=
λ (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (a : α) (i : a ∈ l₁), or.inr (s i)
lemma subset_app_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ (s : l ⊆ l₁) (a : α) (ainl : a ∈ l),
have a ∈ l₁, from s ainl,
mem_append_of_mem_or_mem (or.inl this)
lemma subset_app_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ (s : l ⊆ l₂) (a : α) (ainl : a ∈ l),
have a ∈ l₂, from s ainl,
mem_append_of_mem_or_mem (or.inr this)
lemma cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α} (ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) :
a::l ⊆ m :=
take b, suppose b ∈ a::l,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(suppose b = a, begin subst b, exact ainm end)
(suppose b ∈ l, lsubm this)
lemma app_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
take a, suppose a ∈ l₁ ++ l₂,
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append this)
(suppose a ∈ l₁, l₁subl this)
(suppose a ∈ l₂, l₂subl this)
lemma eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l :list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (begin rw -(length_map f l), simp [h] end)
lemma mem_map (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{simp at h, contradiction },
{simp, simp at h, cases h with h h,
{simph},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
lemma exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{simp at h, contradiction},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{existsi c, simp [h]},
{cases ih h with a ha, cases ha with ha₁ ha₂,
existsi a, simph }}
end
lemma eq_of_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} : ∀ {l : list α}, b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l → b₁ = b₂
| [] h := absurd h (not_mem_nil b₁)
| (a::l) h :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h)
(suppose b₁ = b₂, this)
(suppose b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l, eq_of_map_const this)
end list
|
941c5f81331490c9acc36deb42e98a4dc4b3312b | 42610cc2e5db9c90269470365e6056df0122eaa0 | /hott/init/path.hlean | 8a8f40608a847766a84aec9ebc2a606c0661e052 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tomsib2001/lean | 2ab59bfaebd24a62109f800dcf4a7139ebd73858 | eb639a7d53fb40175bea5c8da86b51d14bb91f76 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,128,387,740 | 1,468,968,950,000 | 1,468,968,950,000 | 61,027,234 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,465,813,585,000 | 1,465,813,585,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,842 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
Ported from Coq HoTT
-/
prelude
import .function .tactic
open function eq
/- Path equality -/
namespace eq
variables {A B C : Type} {P : A → Type} {a a' x y z t : A} {b b' : B}
--notation a = b := eq a b
notation x = y `:>`:50 A:49 := @eq A x y
definition idp [reducible] [constructor] {a : A} := refl a
definition idpath [reducible] [constructor] (a : A) := refl a
-- unbased path induction
definition rec' [reducible] [unfold 6] {P : Π (a b : A), (a = b) → Type}
(H : Π (a : A), P a a idp) {a b : A} (p : a = b) : P a b p :=
eq.rec (H a) p
definition rec_on' [reducible] [unfold 5] {P : Π (a b : A), (a = b) → Type}
{a b : A} (p : a = b) (H : Π (a : A), P a a idp) : P a b p :=
eq.rec (H a) p
/- Concatenation and inverse -/
definition concat [trans] [unfold 6] (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : x = z :=
by induction q; exact p
definition inverse [symm] [unfold 4] (p : x = y) : y = x :=
by induction p; reflexivity
infix ⬝ := concat
postfix ⁻¹ := inverse
--a second notation for the inverse, which is not overloaded
postfix [parsing_only] `⁻¹ᵖ`:std.prec.max_plus := inverse
/- The 1-dimensional groupoid structure -/
-- The identity path is a right unit.
definition con_idp [unfold_full] (p : x = y) : p ⬝ idp = p :=
idp
-- The identity path is a right unit.
definition idp_con [unfold 4] (p : x = y) : idp ⬝ p = p :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- Concatenation is associative.
definition con.assoc' (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : z = t) :
p ⬝ (q ⬝ r) = (p ⬝ q) ⬝ r :=
by induction r; reflexivity
definition con.assoc (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : z = t) :
(p ⬝ q) ⬝ r = p ⬝ (q ⬝ r) :=
by induction r; reflexivity
definition con.assoc5 {a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ a₅ a₆ : A}
(p₁ : a₁ = a₂) (p₂ : a₂ = a₃) (p₃ : a₃ = a₄) (p₄ : a₄ = a₅) (p₅ : a₅ = a₆) :
p₁ ⬝ (p₂ ⬝ p₃ ⬝ p₄) ⬝ p₅ = (p₁ ⬝ p₂) ⬝ p₃ ⬝ (p₄ ⬝ p₅) :=
by induction p₅; induction p₄; induction p₃; reflexivity
-- The left inverse law.
definition con.right_inv [unfold 4] (p : x = y) : p ⬝ p⁻¹ = idp :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- The right inverse law.
definition con.left_inv [unfold 4] (p : x = y) : p⁻¹ ⬝ p = idp :=
by induction p; reflexivity
/- Several auxiliary theorems about canceling inverses across associativity. These are somewhat
redundant, following from earlier theorems. -/
definition inv_con_cancel_left (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : p⁻¹ ⬝ (p ⬝ q) = q :=
by induction q; induction p; reflexivity
definition con_inv_cancel_left (p : x = y) (q : x = z) : p ⬝ (p⁻¹ ⬝ q) = q :=
by induction q; induction p; reflexivity
definition con_inv_cancel_right (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : (p ⬝ q) ⬝ q⁻¹ = p :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition inv_con_cancel_right (p : x = z) (q : y = z) : (p ⬝ q⁻¹) ⬝ q = p :=
by induction q; reflexivity
-- Inverse distributes over concatenation
definition con_inv (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : (p ⬝ q)⁻¹ = q⁻¹ ⬝ p⁻¹ :=
by induction q; induction p; reflexivity
definition inv_con_inv_left (p : y = x) (q : y = z) : (p⁻¹ ⬝ q)⁻¹ = q⁻¹ ⬝ p :=
by induction q; induction p; reflexivity
definition inv_con_inv_right (p : x = y) (q : z = y) : (p ⬝ q⁻¹)⁻¹ = q ⬝ p⁻¹ :=
by induction q; induction p; reflexivity
definition inv_con_inv_inv (p : y = x) (q : z = y) : (p⁻¹ ⬝ q⁻¹)⁻¹ = q ⬝ p :=
by induction q; induction p; reflexivity
-- Inverse is an involution.
definition inv_inv (p : x = y) : p⁻¹⁻¹ = p :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- auxiliary definition used by 'cases' tactic
definition elim_inv_inv {A : Type} {a b : A} {C : a = b → Type} (H₁ : a = b) (H₂ : C (H₁⁻¹⁻¹)) : C H₁ :=
eq.rec_on (inv_inv H₁) H₂
/- Theorems for moving things around in equations -/
definition con_eq_of_eq_inv_con {p : x = z} {q : y = z} {r : y = x} :
p = r⁻¹ ⬝ q → r ⬝ p = q :=
begin
induction r, intro h, exact !idp_con ⬝ h ⬝ !idp_con
end
definition con_eq_of_eq_con_inv [unfold 5] {p : x = z} {q : y = z} {r : y = x} :
r = q ⬝ p⁻¹ → r ⬝ p = q :=
by induction p; exact id
definition inv_con_eq_of_eq_con {p : x = z} {q : y = z} {r : x = y} :
p = r ⬝ q → r⁻¹ ⬝ p = q :=
by induction r; intro h; exact !idp_con ⬝ h ⬝ !idp_con
definition con_inv_eq_of_eq_con [unfold 5] {p : z = x} {q : y = z} {r : y = x} :
r = q ⬝ p → r ⬝ p⁻¹ = q :=
by induction p; exact id
definition eq_con_of_inv_con_eq {p : x = z} {q : y = z} {r : y = x} :
r⁻¹ ⬝ q = p → q = r ⬝ p :=
by induction r; intro h; exact !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ h ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹
definition eq_con_of_con_inv_eq [unfold 5] {p : x = z} {q : y = z} {r : y = x} :
q ⬝ p⁻¹ = r → q = r ⬝ p :=
by induction p; exact id
definition eq_inv_con_of_con_eq {p : x = z} {q : y = z} {r : x = y} :
r ⬝ q = p → q = r⁻¹ ⬝ p :=
by induction r; intro h; exact !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ h ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹
definition eq_con_inv_of_con_eq [unfold 5] {p : z = x} {q : y = z} {r : y = x} :
q ⬝ p = r → q = r ⬝ p⁻¹ :=
by induction p; exact id
definition eq_of_con_inv_eq_idp [unfold 5] {p q : x = y} : p ⬝ q⁻¹ = idp → p = q :=
by induction q; exact id
definition eq_of_inv_con_eq_idp {p q : x = y} : q⁻¹ ⬝ p = idp → p = q :=
by induction q; intro h; exact !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ h
definition eq_inv_of_con_eq_idp' [unfold 5] {p : x = y} {q : y = x} : p ⬝ q = idp → p = q⁻¹ :=
by induction q; exact id
definition eq_inv_of_con_eq_idp {p : x = y} {q : y = x} : q ⬝ p = idp → p = q⁻¹ :=
by induction q; intro h; exact !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ h
definition eq_of_idp_eq_inv_con {p q : x = y} : idp = p⁻¹ ⬝ q → p = q :=
by induction p; intro h; exact h ⬝ !idp_con
definition eq_of_idp_eq_con_inv [unfold 4] {p q : x = y} : idp = q ⬝ p⁻¹ → p = q :=
by induction p; exact id
definition inv_eq_of_idp_eq_con [unfold 4] {p : x = y} {q : y = x} : idp = q ⬝ p → p⁻¹ = q :=
by induction p; exact id
definition inv_eq_of_idp_eq_con' {p : x = y} {q : y = x} : idp = p ⬝ q → p⁻¹ = q :=
by induction p; intro h; exact h ⬝ !idp_con
definition con_inv_eq_idp [unfold 6] {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) : p ⬝ q⁻¹ = idp :=
by cases r; apply con.right_inv
definition inv_con_eq_idp [unfold 6] {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) : q⁻¹ ⬝ p = idp :=
by cases r; apply con.left_inv
definition con_eq_idp {p : x = y} {q : y = x} (r : p = q⁻¹) : p ⬝ q = idp :=
by cases q; exact r
definition idp_eq_inv_con {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) : idp = p⁻¹ ⬝ q :=
by cases r; exact !con.left_inv⁻¹
definition idp_eq_con_inv {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) : idp = q ⬝ p⁻¹ :=
by cases r; exact !con.right_inv⁻¹
definition idp_eq_con {p : x = y} {q : y = x} (r : p⁻¹ = q) : idp = q ⬝ p :=
by cases p; exact r
definition eq_idp_of_con_right {p : x = x} {q : x = y} (r : p ⬝ q = q) : p = idp :=
by cases q; exact r
definition eq_idp_of_con_left {p : x = x} {q : y = x} (r : q ⬝ p = q) : p = idp :=
by cases q; exact (idp_con p)⁻¹ ⬝ r
definition idp_eq_of_con_right {p : x = x} {q : x = y} (r : q = p ⬝ q) : idp = p :=
by cases q; exact r
definition idp_eq_of_con_left {p : x = x} {q : y = x} (r : q = q ⬝ p) : idp = p :=
by cases q; exact r ⬝ idp_con p
/- Transport -/
definition transport [subst] [reducible] [unfold 5] (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y)
(u : P x) : P y :=
by induction p; exact u
-- This idiom makes the operation right associative.
infixr ` ▸ ` := transport _
definition cast [reducible] [unfold 3] {A B : Type} (p : A = B) (a : A) : B :=
p ▸ a
definition cast_def [reducible] [unfold_full] {A B : Type} (p : A = B) (a : A)
: cast p a = p ▸ a :=
idp
definition tr_rev [reducible] [unfold 6] (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (u : P y) : P x :=
p⁻¹ ▸ u
definition ap [unfold 6] ⦃A B : Type⦄ (f : A → B) {x y:A} (p : x = y) : f x = f y :=
by induction p; reflexivity
abbreviation ap01 [parsing_only] := ap
definition homotopy [reducible] (f g : Πx, P x) : Type :=
Πx : A, f x = g x
infix ~ := homotopy
protected definition homotopy.refl [refl] [reducible] [unfold_full] (f : Πx, P x) : f ~ f :=
λ x, idp
protected definition homotopy.symm [symm] [reducible] [unfold_full] {f g : Πx, P x} (H : f ~ g)
: g ~ f :=
λ x, (H x)⁻¹
protected definition homotopy.trans [trans] [reducible] [unfold_full] {f g h : Πx, P x}
(H1 : f ~ g) (H2 : g ~ h) : f ~ h :=
λ x, H1 x ⬝ H2 x
definition homotopy_of_eq {f g : Πx, P x} (H1 : f = g) : f ~ g :=
H1 ▸ homotopy.refl f
definition apd10 [unfold 5] {f g : Πx, P x} (H : f = g) : f ~ g :=
λx, by induction H; reflexivity
--the next theorem is useful if you want to write "apply (apd10' a)"
definition apd10' [unfold 6] {f g : Πx, P x} (a : A) (H : f = g) : f a = g a :=
by induction H; reflexivity
--apd10 is also ap evaluation
definition apd10_eq_ap_eval {f g : Πx, P x} (H : f = g) (a : A)
: apd10 H a = ap (λs : Πx, P x, s a) H :=
by induction H; reflexivity
definition ap10 [reducible] [unfold 5] {f g : A → B} (H : f = g) : f ~ g := apd10 H
definition ap11 {f g : A → B} (H : f = g) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : f x = g y :=
by induction H; exact ap f p
-- [apd] is defined in init.pathover using pathover instead of an equality with transport.
definition apdt [unfold 6] (f : Πa, P a) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p ▸ f x = f y :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ap011 [unfold 9] (f : A → B → C) (Ha : a = a') (Hb : b = b') : f a b = f a' b' :=
by cases Ha; exact ap (f a) Hb
/- More theorems for moving things around in equations -/
definition tr_eq_of_eq_inv_tr {P : A → Type} {x y : A} {p : x = y} {u : P x} {v : P y} :
u = p⁻¹ ▸ v → p ▸ u = v :=
by induction p; exact id
definition inv_tr_eq_of_eq_tr {P : A → Type} {x y : A} {p : y = x} {u : P x} {v : P y} :
u = p ▸ v → p⁻¹ ▸ u = v :=
by induction p; exact id
definition eq_inv_tr_of_tr_eq {P : A → Type} {x y : A} {p : x = y} {u : P x} {v : P y} :
p ▸ u = v → u = p⁻¹ ▸ v :=
by induction p; exact id
definition eq_tr_of_inv_tr_eq {P : A → Type} {x y : A} {p : y = x} {u : P x} {v : P y} :
p⁻¹ ▸ u = v → u = p ▸ v :=
by induction p; exact id
/- Functoriality of functions -/
-- Here we prove that functions behave like functors between groupoids, and that [ap] itself is
-- functorial.
-- Functions take identity paths to identity paths
definition ap_idp [unfold_full] (x : A) (f : A → B) : ap f idp = idp :> (f x = f x) := idp
-- Functions commute with concatenation.
definition ap_con [unfold 8] (f : A → B) {x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
ap f (p ⬝ q) = ap f p ⬝ ap f q :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition con_ap_con_eq_con_ap_con_ap (f : A → B) {w x y z : A} (r : f w = f x)
(p : x = y) (q : y = z) : r ⬝ ap f (p ⬝ q) = (r ⬝ ap f p) ⬝ ap f q :=
by induction q; induction p; reflexivity
definition ap_con_con_eq_ap_con_ap_con (f : A → B) {w x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z)
(r : f z = f w) : ap f (p ⬝ q) ⬝ r = ap f p ⬝ (ap f q ⬝ r) :=
by induction q; induction p; apply con.assoc
-- Functions commute with path inverses.
definition ap_inv' [unfold 6] (f : A → B) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : (ap f p)⁻¹ = ap f p⁻¹ :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ap_inv [unfold 6] (f : A → B) {x y : A} (p : x = y) : ap f p⁻¹ = (ap f p)⁻¹ :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- [ap] itself is functorial in the first argument.
definition ap_id [unfold 4] (p : x = y) : ap id p = p :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ap_compose [unfold 8] (g : B → C) (f : A → B) {x y : A} (p : x = y) :
ap (g ∘ f) p = ap g (ap f p) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- Sometimes we don't have the actual function [compose].
definition ap_compose' [unfold 8] (g : B → C) (f : A → B) {x y : A} (p : x = y) :
ap (λa, g (f a)) p = ap g (ap f p) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- The action of constant maps.
definition ap_constant [unfold 5] (p : x = y) (z : B) : ap (λu, z) p = idp :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- Naturality of [ap].
-- see also natural_square in cubical.square
definition ap_con_eq_con_ap {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y) :
ap f q ⬝ p y = p x ⬝ ap g q :=
by induction q; apply idp_con
-- Naturality of [ap] at identity.
definition ap_con_eq_con {f : A → A} (p : Πx, f x = x) {x y : A} (q : x = y) :
ap f q ⬝ p y = p x ⬝ q :=
by induction q; apply idp_con
definition con_ap_eq_con {f : A → A} (p : Πx, x = f x) {x y : A} (q : x = y) :
p x ⬝ ap f q = q ⬝ p y :=
by induction q; exact !idp_con⁻¹
-- Naturality of [ap] with constant function
definition ap_con_eq {f : A → B} {b : B} (p : Πx, f x = b) {x y : A} (q : x = y) :
ap f q ⬝ p y = p x :=
by induction q; apply idp_con
-- Naturality with other paths hanging around.
definition con_ap_con_con_eq_con_con_ap_con {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{w z : B} (r : w = f x) (s : g y = z) :
(r ⬝ ap f q) ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) = (r ⬝ p x) ⬝ (ap g q ⬝ s) :=
by induction s; induction q; reflexivity
definition con_ap_con_eq_con_con_ap {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{w : B} (r : w = f x) :
(r ⬝ ap f q) ⬝ p y = (r ⬝ p x) ⬝ ap g q :=
by induction q; reflexivity
-- TODO: try this using the simplifier, and compare proofs
definition ap_con_con_eq_con_ap_con {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{z : B} (s : g y = z) :
ap f q ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) = p x ⬝ (ap g q ⬝ s) :=
begin
induction s,
induction q,
apply idp_con
end
definition con_ap_con_con_eq_con_con_con {f : A → A} (p : f ~ id) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{w z : A} (r : w = f x) (s : y = z) :
(r ⬝ ap f q) ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) = (r ⬝ p x) ⬝ (q ⬝ s) :=
by induction s; induction q; reflexivity
definition con_con_ap_con_eq_con_con_con {g : A → A} (p : id ~ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{w z : A} (r : w = x) (s : g y = z) :
(r ⬝ p x) ⬝ (ap g q ⬝ s) = (r ⬝ q) ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) :=
by induction s; induction q; reflexivity
definition con_ap_con_eq_con_con {f : A → A} (p : f ~ id) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{w : A} (r : w = f x) :
(r ⬝ ap f q) ⬝ p y = (r ⬝ p x) ⬝ q :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition ap_con_con_eq_con_con {f : A → A} (p : f ~ id) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{z : A} (s : y = z) :
ap f q ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) = p x ⬝ (q ⬝ s) :=
by induction s; induction q; apply idp_con
definition con_con_ap_eq_con_con {g : A → A} (p : id ~ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{w : A} (r : w = x) :
(r ⬝ p x) ⬝ ap g q = (r ⬝ q) ⬝ p y :=
begin cases q, exact idp end
definition con_ap_con_eq_con_con' {g : A → A} (p : id ~ g) {x y : A} (q : x = y)
{z : A} (s : g y = z) :
p x ⬝ (ap g q ⬝ s) = q ⬝ (p y ⬝ s) :=
by induction s; induction q; exact !idp_con⁻¹
/- Action of [apd10] and [ap10] on paths -/
-- Application of paths between functions preserves the groupoid structure
definition apd10_idp (f : Πx, P x) (x : A) : apd10 (refl f) x = idp := idp
definition apd10_con {f f' f'' : Πx, P x} (h : f = f') (h' : f' = f'') (x : A) :
apd10 (h ⬝ h') x = apd10 h x ⬝ apd10 h' x :=
by induction h; induction h'; reflexivity
definition apd10_inv {f g : Πx : A, P x} (h : f = g) (x : A) :
apd10 h⁻¹ x = (apd10 h x)⁻¹ :=
by induction h; reflexivity
definition ap10_idp {f : A → B} (x : A) : ap10 (refl f) x = idp := idp
definition ap10_con {f f' f'' : A → B} (h : f = f') (h' : f' = f'') (x : A) :
ap10 (h ⬝ h') x = ap10 h x ⬝ ap10 h' x := apd10_con h h' x
definition ap10_inv {f g : A → B} (h : f = g) (x : A) : ap10 h⁻¹ x = (ap10 h x)⁻¹ :=
apd10_inv h x
-- [ap10] also behaves nicely on paths produced by [ap]
definition ap_ap10 (f g : A → B) (h : B → C) (p : f = g) (a : A) :
ap h (ap10 p a) = ap10 (ap (λ f', h ∘ f') p) a:=
by induction p; reflexivity
/- Transport and the groupoid structure of paths -/
definition idp_tr {P : A → Type} {x : A} (u : P x) : idp ▸ u = u := idp
definition con_tr [unfold 7] {P : A → Type} {x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (u : P x) :
p ⬝ q ▸ u = q ▸ p ▸ u :=
by induction q; reflexivity
definition tr_inv_tr {P : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) (z : P y) :
p ▸ p⁻¹ ▸ z = z :=
(con_tr p⁻¹ p z)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λr, transport P r z) (con.left_inv p)
definition inv_tr_tr {P : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) (z : P x) :
p⁻¹ ▸ p ▸ z = z :=
(con_tr p p⁻¹ z)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λr, transport P r z) (con.right_inv p)
definition cast_cast_inv {A : Type} {P : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) (z : P y) :
cast (ap P p) (cast (ap P p⁻¹) z) = z :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition cast_inv_cast {A : Type} {P : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) (z : P x) :
cast (ap P p⁻¹) (cast (ap P p) z) = z :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition con_con_tr {P : A → Type}
{x y z w : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : z = w) (u : P x) :
ap (λe, e ▸ u) (con.assoc' p q r) ⬝ (con_tr (p ⬝ q) r u) ⬝
ap (transport P r) (con_tr p q u)
= (con_tr p (q ⬝ r) u) ⬝ (con_tr q r (p ▸ u))
:> ((p ⬝ (q ⬝ r)) ▸ u = r ▸ q ▸ p ▸ u) :=
by induction r; induction q; induction p; reflexivity
-- Here is another coherence lemma for transport.
definition tr_inv_tr_lemma {P : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) (z : P x) :
tr_inv_tr p (transport P p z) = ap (transport P p) (inv_tr_tr p z) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
/- some properties for apdt -/
definition apdt_idp (x : A) (f : Πx, P x) : apdt f idp = idp :> (f x = f x) := idp
definition apdt_con (f : Πx, P x) {x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z)
: apdt f (p ⬝ q) = con_tr p q (f x) ⬝ ap (transport P q) (apdt f p) ⬝ apdt f q :=
by cases p; cases q; apply idp
definition apdt_inv (f : Πx, P x) {x y : A} (p : x = y)
: apdt f p⁻¹ = (eq_inv_tr_of_tr_eq (apdt f p))⁻¹ :=
by cases p; apply idp
-- Dependent transport in a doubly dependent type.
definition transportD [unfold 6] {P : A → Type} (Q : Πa, P a → Type)
{a a' : A} (p : a = a') (b : P a) (z : Q a b) : Q a' (p ▸ b) :=
by induction p; exact z
-- In Coq the variables P, Q and b are explicit, but in Lean we can probably have them implicit
-- using the following notation
notation p ` ▸D `:65 x:64 := transportD _ p _ x
-- transporting over 2 one-dimensional paths
definition transport11 {A B : Type} (P : A → B → Type) {a a' : A} {b b' : B}
(p : a = a') (q : b = b') (z : P a b) : P a' b' :=
transport (P a') q (p ▸ z)
-- Transporting along higher-dimensional paths
definition transport2 [unfold 7] (P : A → Type) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) (z : P x) :
p ▸ z = q ▸ z :=
ap (λp', p' ▸ z) r
notation p ` ▸2 `:65 x:64 := transport2 _ p _ x
-- An alternative definition.
definition tr2_eq_ap10 (Q : A → Type) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) (z : Q x) :
transport2 Q r z = ap10 (ap (transport Q) r) z :=
by induction r; reflexivity
definition tr2_con {P : A → Type} {x y : A} {p1 p2 p3 : x = y}
(r1 : p1 = p2) (r2 : p2 = p3) (z : P x) :
transport2 P (r1 ⬝ r2) z = transport2 P r1 z ⬝ transport2 P r2 z :=
by induction r1; induction r2; reflexivity
definition tr2_inv (Q : A → Type) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) (z : Q x) :
transport2 Q r⁻¹ z = (transport2 Q r z)⁻¹ :=
by induction r; reflexivity
definition transportD2 [unfold 7] {B C : A → Type} (D : Π(a:A), B a → C a → Type)
{x1 x2 : A} (p : x1 = x2) (y : B x1) (z : C x1) (w : D x1 y z) : D x2 (p ▸ y) (p ▸ z) :=
by induction p; exact w
notation p ` ▸D2 `:65 x:64 := transportD2 _ p _ _ x
definition ap_tr_con_tr2 (P : A → Type) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} {z w : P x} (r : p = q)
(s : z = w) :
ap (transport P p) s ⬝ transport2 P r w = transport2 P r z ⬝ ap (transport P q) s :=
by induction r; exact !idp_con⁻¹
definition fn_tr_eq_tr_fn {P Q : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) (f : Πx, P x → Q x) (z : P x) :
f y (p ▸ z) = p ▸ f x z :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition fn_cast_eq_cast_fn {A : Type} {P Q : A → Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y)
(f : Πx, P x → Q x) (z : P x) : f y (cast (ap P p) z) = cast (ap Q p) (f x z) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
/- Transporting in particular fibrations -/
/-
From the Coq HoTT library:
One frequently needs lemmas showing that transport in a certain dependent type is equal to some
more explicitly defined operation, defined according to the structure of that dependent type.
For most dependent types, we prove these lemmas in the appropriate file in the types/
subdirectory. Here we consider only the most basic cases.
-/
-- Transporting in a constant fibration.
definition tr_constant (p : x = y) (z : B) : transport (λx, B) p z = z :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition tr2_constant {p q : x = y} (r : p = q) (z : B) :
tr_constant p z = transport2 (λu, B) r z ⬝ tr_constant q z :=
by induction r; exact !idp_con⁻¹
-- Transporting in a pulled back fibration.
definition tr_compose (P : B → Type) (f : A → B) (p : x = y) (z : P (f x)) :
transport (P ∘ f) p z = transport P (ap f p) z :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ap_precompose (f : A → B) (g g' : B → C) (p : g = g') :
ap (λh, h ∘ f) p = transport (λh : B → C, g ∘ f = h ∘ f) p idp :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition apd10_ap_precompose (f : A → B) (g g' : B → C) (p : g = g') :
apd10 (ap (λh : B → C, h ∘ f) p) = λa, apd10 p (f a) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition apd10_ap_precompose_dependent {C : B → Type}
(f : A → B) {g g' : Πb : B, C b} (p : g = g')
: apd10 (ap (λ(h : (Πb : B, C b))(a : A), h (f a)) p) = λa, apd10 p (f a) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition apd10_ap_postcompose (f : B → C) (g g' : A → B) (p : g = g') :
apd10 (ap (λh : A → B, f ∘ h) p) = λa, ap f (apd10 p a) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- A special case of [tr_compose] which seems to come up a lot.
definition tr_eq_cast_ap {P : A → Type} {x y} (p : x = y) (u : P x) : p ▸ u = cast (ap P p) u :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition tr_eq_cast_ap_fn {P : A → Type} {x y} (p : x = y) : transport P p = cast (ap P p) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
/- The behavior of [ap] and [apdt] -/
-- In a constant fibration, [apdt] reduces to [ap], modulo [transport_const].
definition apdt_eq_tr_constant_con_ap (f : A → B) (p : x = y) :
apdt f p = tr_constant p (f x) ⬝ ap f p :=
by induction p; reflexivity
/- The 2-dimensional groupoid structure -/
-- Horizontal composition of 2-dimensional paths.
definition concat2 [unfold 9 10] {p p' : x = y} {q q' : y = z} (h : p = p') (h' : q = q')
: p ⬝ q = p' ⬝ q' :=
ap011 concat h h'
-- 2-dimensional path inversion
definition inverse2 [unfold 6] {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) : p⁻¹ = q⁻¹ :=
ap inverse h
infixl ` ◾ `:75 := concat2
postfix [parsing_only] `⁻²`:(max+10) := inverse2 --this notation is abusive, should we use it?
/- Whiskering -/
definition whisker_left [unfold 8] (p : x = y) {q r : y = z} (h : q = r) : p ⬝ q = p ⬝ r :=
idp ◾ h
definition whisker_right [unfold 7] {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) (r : y = z) : p ⬝ r = q ⬝ r :=
h ◾ idp
-- Unwhiskering, a.k.a. cancelling
definition cancel_left {x y z : A} (p : x = y) {q r : y = z} : (p ⬝ q = p ⬝ r) → (q = r) :=
λs, !inv_con_cancel_left⁻¹ ⬝ whisker_left p⁻¹ s ⬝ !inv_con_cancel_left
definition cancel_right {x y z : A} {p q : x = y} (r : y = z) : (p ⬝ r = q ⬝ r) → (p = q) :=
λs, !con_inv_cancel_right⁻¹ ⬝ whisker_right s r⁻¹ ⬝ !con_inv_cancel_right
-- Whiskering and identity paths.
definition whisker_right_idp {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) :
whisker_right h idp = h :=
by induction h; induction p; reflexivity
definition whisker_right_idp_left [unfold_full] (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
whisker_right idp q = idp :> (p ⬝ q = p ⬝ q) :=
idp
definition whisker_left_idp_right [unfold_full] (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
whisker_left p idp = idp :> (p ⬝ q = p ⬝ q) :=
idp
definition whisker_left_idp {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) :
(idp_con p)⁻¹ ⬝ whisker_left idp h ⬝ idp_con q = h :=
by induction h; induction p; reflexivity
definition whisker_left_idp2 {A : Type} {a : A} (p : idp = idp :> a = a) :
whisker_left idp p = p :=
begin
refine _ ⬝ whisker_left_idp p,
exact !idp_con⁻¹
end
definition con2_idp [unfold_full] {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) :
h ◾ idp = whisker_right h idp :> (p ⬝ idp = q ⬝ idp) :=
idp
definition idp_con2 [unfold_full] {p q : x = y} (h : p = q) :
idp ◾ h = whisker_left idp h :> (idp ⬝ p = idp ⬝ q) :=
idp
definition inv2_con2 {p p' : x = y} (h : p = p')
: h⁻² ◾ h = con.left_inv p ⬝ (con.left_inv p')⁻¹ :=
by induction h; induction p; reflexivity
-- The interchange law for concatenation.
definition con2_con_con2 {p p' p'' : x = y} {q q' q'' : y = z}
(a : p = p') (b : p' = p'') (c : q = q') (d : q' = q'') :
(a ◾ c) ⬝ (b ◾ d) = (a ⬝ b) ◾ (c ⬝ d) :=
by induction d; induction c; induction b;induction a; reflexivity
definition con2_eq_rl {A : Type} {x y z : A} {p p' : x = y} {q q' : y = z}
(a : p = p') (b : q = q') : a ◾ b = whisker_right a q ⬝ whisker_left p' b :=
by induction b; induction a; reflexivity
definition con2_eq_lf {A : Type} {x y z : A} {p p' : x = y} {q q' : y = z}
(a : p = p') (b : q = q') : a ◾ b = whisker_left p b ⬝ whisker_right a q' :=
by induction b; induction a; reflexivity
definition whisker_right_con_whisker_left {x y z : A} {p p' : x = y} {q q' : y = z}
(a : p = p') (b : q = q') :
(whisker_right a q) ⬝ (whisker_left p' b) = (whisker_left p b) ⬝ (whisker_right a q') :=
by induction b; induction a; reflexivity
-- Structure corresponding to the coherence equations of a bicategory.
-- The "pentagonator": the 3-cell witnessing the associativity pentagon.
definition pentagon {v w x y z : A} (p : v = w) (q : w = x) (r : x = y) (s : y = z) :
whisker_left p (con.assoc' q r s)
⬝ con.assoc' p (q ⬝ r) s
⬝ whisker_right (con.assoc' p q r) s
= con.assoc' p q (r ⬝ s) ⬝ con.assoc' (p ⬝ q) r s :=
by induction s;induction r;induction q;induction p;reflexivity
-- The 3-cell witnessing the left unit triangle.
definition triangulator (p : x = y) (q : y = z) :
con.assoc' p idp q ⬝ whisker_right (con_idp p) q = whisker_left p (idp_con q) :=
by induction q; induction p; reflexivity
definition eckmann_hilton (p q : idp = idp :> a = a) : p ⬝ q = q ⬝ p :=
begin
refine (whisker_right_idp p ◾ whisker_left_idp2 q)⁻¹ ⬝ _,
refine !whisker_right_con_whisker_left ⬝ _,
refine !whisker_left_idp2 ◾ !whisker_right_idp
end
definition con_eq_con2 (p q : idp = idp :> a = a) : p ⬝ q = p ◾ q :=
begin
refine (whisker_right_idp p ◾ whisker_left_idp2 q)⁻¹ ⬝ _,
exact !con2_eq_rl⁻¹
end
definition inv_eq_inv2 (p : idp = idp :> a = a) : p⁻¹ = p⁻² :=
begin
apply eq.cancel_right p,
refine !con.left_inv ⬝ _,
refine _ ⬝ !con_eq_con2⁻¹,
exact !inv2_con2⁻¹,
end
-- The action of functions on 2-dimensional paths
definition ap02 [unfold 8] [reducible] (f : A → B) {x y : A} {p q : x = y} (r : p = q)
: ap f p = ap f q :=
ap (ap f) r
definition ap02_con (f : A → B) {x y : A} {p p' p'' : x = y} (r : p = p') (r' : p' = p'') :
ap02 f (r ⬝ r') = ap02 f r ⬝ ap02 f r' :=
by induction r; induction r'; reflexivity
definition ap02_con2 (f : A → B) {x y z : A} {p p' : x = y} {q q' :y = z} (r : p = p')
(s : q = q') :
ap02 f (r ◾ s) = ap_con f p q
⬝ (ap02 f r ◾ ap02 f s)
⬝ (ap_con f p' q')⁻¹ :=
by induction r; induction s; induction q; induction p; reflexivity
definition apdt02 [unfold 8] {p q : x = y} (f : Π x, P x) (r : p = q) :
apdt f p = transport2 P r (f x) ⬝ apdt f q :=
by induction r; exact !idp_con⁻¹
-- And now for a lemma whose statement is much longer than its proof.
definition apdt02_con {P : A → Type} (f : Π x:A, P x) {x y : A}
{p1 p2 p3 : x = y} (r1 : p1 = p2) (r2 : p2 = p3) :
apdt02 f (r1 ⬝ r2) = apdt02 f r1
⬝ whisker_left (transport2 P r1 (f x)) (apdt02 f r2)
⬝ con.assoc' _ _ _
⬝ (whisker_right (tr2_con r1 r2 (f x))⁻¹ (apdt f p3)) :=
by induction r2; induction r1; induction p1; reflexivity
end eq
/-
an auxillary namespace for concatenation and inversion for homotopies. We put this is a separate
namespace because ⁻¹ʰ is also used as the inverse of a homomorphism
-/
open eq
namespace homotopy
infix ` ⬝h `:75 := homotopy.trans
postfix `⁻¹ʰ`:(max+1) := homotopy.symm
end homotopy
|
cf3754960ed3c00a49ef471680efbd2f8f61252f | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/data/int/basic.lean | 8e6ffb119c74ea4b1fab737b953b82ca598aa9f5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 55,358 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import algebra.order.functions
import data.nat.pow
/-!
# Basic operations on the integers
This file contains:
* instances on `ℤ`. The stronger one is `int.linear_ordered_comm_ring`.
* some basic lemmas about integers
## Recursors
* `int.rec`: Sign disjunction. Something is true/defined on `ℤ` if it's true/defined for nonnegative
and for negative values.
* `int.bit_cases_on`: Parity disjunction. Something is true/defined on `ℤ` if it's true/defined for
even and for odd values.
* `int.induction_on`: Simple growing induction on positive numbers, plus simple decreasing induction
on negative numbers. Note that this recursor is currently only `Prop`-valued.
* `int.induction_on'`: Simple growing induction for numbers greater than `b`, plus simple decreasing
induction on numbers less than `b`.
-/
open nat
namespace int
instance : inhabited ℤ := ⟨int.zero⟩
instance : nontrivial ℤ :=
⟨⟨0, 1, int.zero_ne_one⟩⟩
instance : comm_ring int :=
{ add := int.add,
add_assoc := int.add_assoc,
zero := int.zero,
zero_add := int.zero_add,
add_zero := int.add_zero,
neg := int.neg,
add_left_neg := int.add_left_neg,
add_comm := int.add_comm,
mul := int.mul,
mul_assoc := int.mul_assoc,
one := int.one,
one_mul := int.one_mul,
mul_one := int.mul_one,
sub := int.sub,
left_distrib := int.distrib_left,
right_distrib := int.distrib_right,
mul_comm := int.mul_comm,
gsmul := (*),
gsmul_zero' := int.zero_mul,
gsmul_succ' := λ n x, by rw [succ_eq_one_add, of_nat_add, int.distrib_right, of_nat_one,
int.one_mul],
gsmul_neg' := λ n x, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm (n.succ : ℤ) x }
/-! ### Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
-- instance : has_sub int := by apply_instance -- This is in core
instance : add_comm_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : add_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_monoid int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : add_semigroup int := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semiring int := by apply_instance
instance : semiring int := by apply_instance
instance : ring int := by apply_instance
instance : distrib int := by apply_instance
instance : linear_ordered_comm_ring int :=
{ add_le_add_left := @int.add_le_add_left,
mul_pos := @int.mul_pos,
zero_le_one := le_of_lt int.zero_lt_one,
.. int.comm_ring, .. int.linear_order, .. int.nontrivial }
instance : linear_ordered_add_comm_group int :=
by apply_instance
@[simp] lemma add_neg_one (i : ℤ) : i + -1 = i - 1 := rfl
theorem abs_eq_nat_abs : ∀ a : ℤ, |a| = nat_abs a
| (n : ℕ) := abs_of_nonneg $ coe_zero_le _
| -[1+ n] := abs_of_nonpos $ le_of_lt $ neg_succ_lt_zero _
theorem nat_abs_abs (a : ℤ) : nat_abs (|a|) = nat_abs a :=
by rw [abs_eq_nat_abs]; refl
theorem sign_mul_abs (a : ℤ) : sign a * |a| = a :=
by rw [abs_eq_nat_abs, sign_mul_nat_abs]
@[simp] lemma default_eq_zero : default ℤ = 0 := rfl
meta instance : has_to_format ℤ := ⟨λ z, to_string z⟩
meta instance : has_reflect ℤ := by tactic.mk_has_reflect_instance
attribute [simp] int.coe_nat_add int.coe_nat_mul int.coe_nat_zero int.coe_nat_one int.coe_nat_succ
attribute [simp] int.of_nat_eq_coe int.bodd
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b : ℤ} : int.add a b = a + b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b : ℤ} : int.mul a b = a * b := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_succ_not_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ -[1+ n] ↔ false :=
by { simp only [not_le, iff_false], exact int.neg_succ_lt_zero n, }
@[simp] lemma neg_succ_not_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < -[1+ n] ↔ false :=
by simp only [not_lt, iff_false]
@[simp] lemma neg_succ_sub_one (n : ℕ) : -[1+ n] - 1 = -[1+ (n+1)] := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_nat_mul_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : (m : ℤ) * -[1+ n] = -(m * succ n) := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_succ_mul_coe_nat (m n : ℕ) : -[1+ m] * n = -(succ m * n) := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_succ_mul_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : -[1+ m] * -[1+ n] = succ m * succ n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nat_le {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) ≤ ↑n ↔ m ≤ n := coe_nat_le_coe_nat_iff m n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nat_lt {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) < ↑n ↔ m < n := coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_iff m n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nat_inj' {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) = ↑n ↔ m = n := int.coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff m n
@[simp] theorem coe_nat_pos {n : ℕ} : (0 : ℤ) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw [← int.coe_nat_zero, coe_nat_lt]
@[simp] theorem coe_nat_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ℤ) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by rw [← int.coe_nat_zero, coe_nat_inj']
theorem coe_nat_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : ℤ) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr coe_nat_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma coe_nat_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ (n : ℤ) := coe_nat_le.2 (nat.zero_le _)
lemma coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos {n : ℕ} : (n : ℤ) ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < n :=
⟨λ h, nat.pos_of_ne_zero (coe_nat_ne_zero.1 h),
λ h, (ne_of_lt (coe_nat_lt.2 h)).symm⟩
lemma coe_nat_succ_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n.succ : ℤ) := int.coe_nat_pos.2 (succ_pos n)
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_abs (n : ℕ) : |(n : ℤ)| = n :=
abs_of_nonneg (coe_nat_nonneg n)
/-! ### succ and pred -/
/-- Immediate successor of an integer: `succ n = n + 1` -/
def succ (a : ℤ) := a + 1
/-- Immediate predecessor of an integer: `pred n = n - 1` -/
def pred (a : ℤ) := a - 1
theorem nat_succ_eq_int_succ (n : ℕ) : (nat.succ n : ℤ) = int.succ n := rfl
theorem pred_succ (a : ℤ) : pred (succ a) = a := add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem succ_pred (a : ℤ) : succ (pred a) = a := sub_add_cancel _ _
theorem neg_succ (a : ℤ) : -succ a = pred (-a) := neg_add _ _
theorem succ_neg_succ (a : ℤ) : succ (-succ a) = -a :=
by rw [neg_succ, succ_pred]
theorem neg_pred (a : ℤ) : -pred a = succ (-a) :=
by rw [eq_neg_of_eq_neg (neg_succ (-a)).symm, neg_neg]
theorem pred_neg_pred (a : ℤ) : pred (-pred a) = -a :=
by rw [neg_pred, pred_succ]
theorem pred_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : pred (nat.succ n) = n := pred_succ n
theorem neg_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : -(nat.succ n : ℤ) = pred (-n) := neg_succ n
theorem succ_neg_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : succ (-nat.succ n) = -n := succ_neg_succ n
theorem lt_succ_self (a : ℤ) : a < succ a :=
lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one
theorem pred_self_lt (a : ℤ) : pred a < a :=
sub_lt_self _ zero_lt_one
theorem add_one_le_iff {a b : ℤ} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b := iff.rfl
theorem lt_add_one_iff {a b : ℤ} : a < b + 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
add_le_add_iff_right _
@[simp] lemma succ_coe_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n : ℤ) + 1 :=
lt_add_one_iff.mpr (by simp)
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_pred_of_pos {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : ((n - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (n : ℤ) - 1 :=
by { cases n, cases h, simp, }
lemma le_add_one {a b : ℤ} (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b + 1 :=
le_of_lt (int.lt_add_one_iff.mpr h)
theorem sub_one_lt_iff {a b : ℤ} : a - 1 < b ↔ a ≤ b :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.trans lt_add_one_iff
theorem le_sub_one_iff {a b : ℤ} : a ≤ b - 1 ↔ a < b :=
le_sub_iff_add_le
@[simp] lemma eq_zero_iff_abs_lt_one {a : ℤ} : |a| < 1 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨λ a0, let ⟨hn, hp⟩ := abs_lt.mp a0 in (le_of_lt_add_one (by exact hp)).antisymm hn,
λ a0, (abs_eq_zero.mpr a0).le.trans_lt zero_lt_one⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma induction_on {p : ℤ → Prop}
(i : ℤ) (hz : p 0) (hp : ∀ i : ℕ, p i → p (i + 1)) (hn : ∀ i : ℕ, p (-i) → p (-i - 1)) : p i :=
begin
induction i,
{ induction i,
{ exact hz },
{ exact hp _ i_ih } },
{ have : ∀ n:ℕ, p (- n),
{ intro n, induction n,
{ simp [hz] },
{ convert hn _ n_ih using 1, simp [sub_eq_neg_add] } },
exact this (i + 1) }
end
/-- Inductively define a function on `ℤ` by defining it at `b`, for the `succ` of a number greater
than `b`, and the `pred` of a number less than `b`. -/
protected def induction_on' {C : ℤ → Sort*} (z : ℤ) (b : ℤ) :
C b → (∀ k, b ≤ k → C k → C (k + 1)) → (∀ k ≤ b, C k → C (k - 1)) → C z :=
λ H0 Hs Hp,
begin
rw ←sub_add_cancel z b,
induction (z - b) with n n,
{ induction n with n ih, { rwa [of_nat_zero, zero_add] },
rw [of_nat_succ, add_assoc, add_comm 1 b, ←add_assoc],
exact Hs _ (le_add_of_nonneg_left (of_nat_nonneg _)) ih },
{ induction n with n ih,
{ rw [neg_succ_of_nat_eq, ←of_nat_eq_coe, of_nat_zero, zero_add, neg_add_eq_sub],
exact Hp _ (le_refl _) H0 },
{ rw [neg_succ_of_nat_coe', nat.succ_eq_add_one, ←neg_succ_of_nat_coe, sub_add_eq_add_sub],
exact Hp _ (le_of_lt (add_lt_of_neg_of_le (neg_succ_lt_zero _) (le_refl _))) ih } }
end
/-! ### nat abs -/
attribute [simp] nat_abs nat_abs_of_nat nat_abs_zero nat_abs_one
theorem nat_abs_add_le (a b : ℤ) : nat_abs (a + b) ≤ nat_abs a + nat_abs b :=
begin
have : ∀ (a b : ℕ), nat_abs (sub_nat_nat a (nat.succ b)) ≤ nat.succ (a + b),
{ refine (λ a b : ℕ, sub_nat_nat_elim a b.succ
(λ m n i, n = b.succ → nat_abs i ≤ (m + b).succ) _ _ rfl);
intros i n e,
{ subst e, rw [add_comm _ i, add_assoc],
exact nat.le_add_right i (b.succ + b).succ },
{ apply succ_le_succ,
rw [← succ.inj e, ← add_assoc, add_comm],
apply nat.le_add_right } },
cases a; cases b with b b; simp [nat_abs, nat.succ_add];
try {refl}; [skip, rw add_comm a b]; apply this
end
lemma nat_abs_sub_le (a b : ℤ) : nat_abs (a - b) ≤ nat_abs a + nat_abs b :=
by { rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← int.nat_abs_neg b], apply nat_abs_add_le }
theorem nat_abs_neg_of_nat (n : ℕ) : nat_abs (neg_of_nat n) = n :=
by cases n; refl
theorem nat_abs_mul (a b : ℤ) : nat_abs (a * b) = (nat_abs a) * (nat_abs b) :=
by cases a; cases b;
simp only [← int.mul_def, int.mul, nat_abs_neg_of_nat, eq_self_iff_true, int.nat_abs]
lemma nat_abs_mul_nat_abs_eq {a b : ℤ} {c : ℕ} (h : a * b = (c : ℤ)) :
a.nat_abs * b.nat_abs = c :=
by rw [← nat_abs_mul, h, nat_abs_of_nat]
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_mul_self' (a : ℤ) : (nat_abs a * nat_abs a : ℤ) = a * a :=
by rw [← int.coe_nat_mul, nat_abs_mul_self]
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_eq' (m : ℕ) : -[1+ m] = -m - 1 :=
by simp [neg_succ_of_nat_eq, sub_eq_neg_add]
lemma nat_abs_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : z.nat_abs ≠ 0 :=
λ h, hz $ int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero h
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_eq_zero {a : ℤ} : a.nat_abs = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma nat_abs_ne_zero {a : ℤ} : a.nat_abs ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := not_congr int.nat_abs_eq_zero
lemma nat_abs_lt_nat_abs_of_nonneg_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (w₁ : 0 ≤ a) (w₂ : a < b) :
a.nat_abs < b.nat_abs :=
begin
lift b to ℕ using le_trans w₁ (le_of_lt w₂),
lift a to ℕ using w₁,
simpa using w₂,
end
lemma nat_abs_eq_nat_abs_iff {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs = b.nat_abs ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ cases int.nat_abs_eq a with h₁ h₁; cases int.nat_abs_eq b with h₂ h₂;
rw [h₁, h₂]; simp [h], },
{ cases h; rw h, rw int.nat_abs_neg, },
end
lemma nat_abs_eq_iff {a : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : a.nat_abs = n ↔ a = n ∨ a = -n :=
by rw [←int.nat_abs_eq_nat_abs_iff, int.nat_abs_of_nat]
lemma nat_abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs = b.nat_abs ↔ a * a = b * b :=
begin
rw [← abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
exact int.coe_nat_inj'.symm
end
lemma nat_abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs < b.nat_abs ↔ a * a < b * b :=
begin
rw [← abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
exact int.coe_nat_lt.symm
end
lemma nat_abs_le_iff_mul_self_le {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs ≤ b.nat_abs ↔ a * a ≤ b * b :=
begin
rw [← abs_le_iff_mul_self_le, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
exact int.coe_nat_le.symm
end
lemma nat_abs_eq_iff_sq_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs = b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [sq, sq], exact nat_abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq }
lemma nat_abs_lt_iff_sq_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs < b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [sq, sq], exact nat_abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt }
lemma nat_abs_le_iff_sq_le {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs ≤ b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [sq, sq], exact nat_abs_le_iff_mul_self_le }
/-! ### `/` -/
@[simp] theorem of_nat_div (m n : ℕ) : of_nat (m / n) = (of_nat m) / (of_nat n) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : ℤ) = m / n := rfl
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_div (m : ℕ) {b : ℤ} (H : 0 < b) :
-[1+m] / b = -(m / b + 1) :=
match b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H with ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := rfl end
-- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
local attribute [simp]
protected theorem zero_div : ∀ (b : ℤ), 0 / b = 0
| 0 := show of_nat _ = _, by simp
| (n+1:ℕ) := show of_nat _ = _, by simp
| -[1+ n] := show -of_nat _ = _, by simp
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
protected theorem div_zero : ∀ (a : ℤ), a / 0 = 0
| 0 := show of_nat _ = _, by simp
| (n+1:ℕ) := show of_nat _ = _, by simp
| -[1+ n] := rfl
@[simp] protected theorem div_neg : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a / -b = -(a / b)
| (m : ℕ) 0 := show of_nat (m / 0) = -(m / 0 : ℕ), by rw nat.div_zero; refl
| (m : ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| 0 -[1+ n] := by simp
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := (neg_neg _).symm
| -[1+ m] 0 := rfl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := rfl
theorem div_of_neg_of_pos {a b : ℤ} (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : 0 < b) : a / b = -((-a - 1) / b + 1) :=
match a, b, eq_neg_succ_of_lt_zero Ha, eq_succ_of_zero_lt Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ :=
by change (- -[1+ m] : ℤ) with (m+1 : ℤ); rw add_sub_cancel; refl
end
protected theorem div_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a / b :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le Ha, eq_coe_of_zero_le Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := coe_zero_le _
end
protected theorem div_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : b ≤ 0) : a / b ≤ 0 :=
nonpos_of_neg_nonneg $ by rw [← int.div_neg]; exact int.div_nonneg Ha (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos Hb)
theorem div_neg' {a b : ℤ} (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 0 :=
match a, b, eq_neg_succ_of_lt_zero Ha, eq_succ_of_zero_lt Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := neg_succ_lt_zero _
end
@[simp] protected theorem div_one : ∀ (a : ℤ), a / 1 = a
| 0 := show of_nat _ = _, by simp
| (n+1:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.div_one _)
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat (nat.div_one _)
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < b) : a / b = 0 :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le H1, eq_succ_of_zero_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt H1 H2), H2 with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H2 :=
congr_arg of_nat $ nat.div_eq_of_lt $ lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat H2
end
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt_abs {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < |b|) : a / b = 0 :=
match b, |b|, abs_eq_nat_abs b, H2 with
| (n : ℕ), ._, rfl, H2 := div_eq_zero_of_lt H1 H2
| -[1+ n], ._, rfl, H2 := neg_injective $ by rw [← int.div_neg]; exact div_eq_zero_of_lt H1 H2
end
protected theorem add_mul_div_right (a b : ℤ) {c : ℤ} (H : c ≠ 0) :
(a + b * c) / c = a / c + b :=
have ∀ {k n : ℕ} {a : ℤ}, (a + n * k.succ) / k.succ = a / k.succ + n, from
λ k n a, match a with
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ k.succ_pos
| -[1+ m] := show ((n * k.succ:ℕ) - m.succ : ℤ) / k.succ =
n - (m / k.succ + 1 : ℕ), begin
cases lt_or_ge m (n*k.succ) with h h,
{ rw [← int.coe_nat_sub h,
← int.coe_nat_sub ((nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ k.succ_pos).2 h)],
apply congr_arg of_nat,
rw [mul_comm, nat.mul_sub_div], rwa mul_comm },
{ change (↑(n * nat.succ k) - (m + 1) : ℤ) / ↑(nat.succ k) =
↑n - ((m / nat.succ k : ℕ) + 1),
rw [← sub_sub, ← sub_sub, ← neg_sub (m:ℤ), ← neg_sub _ (n:ℤ),
← int.coe_nat_sub h,
← int.coe_nat_sub ((nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ k.succ_pos).2 h),
← neg_succ_of_nat_coe', ← neg_succ_of_nat_coe'],
{ apply congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat,
rw [mul_comm, nat.sub_mul_div], rwa mul_comm } }
end
end,
have ∀ {a b c : ℤ}, 0 < c → (a + b * c) / c = a / c + b, from
λ a b c H, match c, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H, b with
| ._, ⟨k, rfl⟩, (n : ℕ) := this
| ._, ⟨k, rfl⟩, -[1+ n] :=
show (a - n.succ * k.succ) / k.succ = (a / k.succ) - n.succ, from
eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by rw [← this, sub_add_cancel]
end,
match lt_trichotomy c 0 with
| or.inl hlt := neg_inj.1 $ by rw [← int.div_neg, neg_add, ← int.div_neg, ← neg_mul_neg];
apply this (neg_pos_of_neg hlt)
| or.inr (or.inl heq) := absurd heq H
| or.inr (or.inr hgt) := this hgt
end
protected theorem add_mul_div_left (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (H : b ≠ 0) :
(a + b * c) / b = a / b + c :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ H]
protected theorem add_div_of_dvd_right {a b c : ℤ} (H : c ∣ b) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
begin
by_cases h1 : c = 0,
{ simp [h1] },
cases H with k hk,
rw hk,
change c ≠ 0 at h1,
rw [mul_comm c k, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ h1, ←zero_add (k * c), int.add_mul_div_right _ _ h1,
int.zero_div, zero_add]
end
protected theorem add_div_of_dvd_left {a b c : ℤ} (H : c ∣ a) :
(a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
by rw [add_comm, int.add_div_of_dvd_right H, add_comm]
@[simp] protected theorem mul_div_cancel (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a * b / b = a :=
by have := int.add_mul_div_right 0 a H;
rwa [zero_add, int.zero_div, zero_add] at this
@[simp] protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left {a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (H : a ≠ 0) : a * b / a = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.mul_div_cancel _ H]
@[simp] protected theorem div_self {a : ℤ} (H : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 :=
by have := int.mul_div_cancel 1 H; rwa one_mul at this
/-! ### mod -/
theorem of_nat_mod (m n : nat) : (m % n : ℤ) = of_nat (m % n) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_mod (m n : ℕ) : (↑(m % n) : ℤ) = ↑m % ↑n := rfl
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_mod (m : ℕ) {b : ℤ} (bpos : 0 < b) :
-[1+m] % b = b - 1 - m % b :=
by rw [sub_sub, add_comm]; exact
match b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt bpos with ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := rfl end
@[simp] theorem mod_neg : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a % -b = a % b
| (m : ℕ) n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λ i, ↑(m % i)) (nat_abs_neg _)
| -[1+ m] n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λ i, sub_nat_nat i (nat.succ (m % i))) (nat_abs_neg _)
@[simp] theorem mod_abs (a b : ℤ) : a % (|b|) = a % b :=
abs_by_cases (λ i, a % i = a % b) rfl (mod_neg _ _)
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
theorem zero_mod (b : ℤ) : 0 % b = 0 := rfl
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
theorem mod_zero : ∀ (a : ℤ), a % 0 = a
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_zero _
| -[1+ m] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $ nat.mod_zero _
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
theorem mod_one : ∀ (a : ℤ), a % 1 = 0
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_one _
| -[1+ m] := show (1 - (m % 1).succ : ℤ) = 0, by rw nat.mod_one; refl
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < b) : a % b = a :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le H1, eq_coe_of_zero_le (le_trans H1 (le_of_lt H2)), H2 with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H2 :=
congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat H2)
end
theorem mod_nonneg : ∀ (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ}, b ≠ 0 → 0 ≤ a % b
| (m : ℕ) n H := coe_zero_le _
| -[1+ m] n H :=
sub_nonneg_of_le $ coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le $ nat.mod_lt _ (nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero H)
theorem mod_lt_of_pos (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : 0 < b) : a % b < b :=
match a, b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H with
| (m : ℕ), ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt (nat.mod_lt _ (nat.succ_pos _))
| -[1+ m], ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := sub_lt_self _ (coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt $ nat.succ_pos _)
end
theorem mod_lt (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a % b < |b| :=
by rw [← mod_abs]; exact mod_lt_of_pos _ (abs_pos.2 H)
theorem mod_add_div_aux (m n : ℕ) : (n - (m % n + 1) - (n * (m / n) + n) : ℤ) = -[1+ m] :=
begin
rw [← sub_sub, neg_succ_of_nat_coe, sub_sub (n:ℤ)],
apply eq_neg_of_eq_neg,
rw [neg_sub, sub_sub_self, add_right_comm],
exact @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λi, (i + 1 : ℤ)) (nat.mod_add_div _ _).symm
end
theorem mod_add_div : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a % b + b * (a / b) = a
| (m : ℕ) 0 := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| (m : ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| 0 -[1+ n] := by simp
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := show (_ + -(n+1) * -((m + 1) / (n + 1) : ℕ) : ℤ) = _,
by rw [neg_mul_neg]; exact congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| -[1+ m] 0 := by rw [mod_zero, int.div_zero]; refl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := mod_add_div_aux m n.succ
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := mod_add_div_aux m n.succ
theorem div_add_mod (a b : ℤ) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (mod_add_div _ _)
lemma mod_add_div' (m k : ℤ) : m % k + (m / k) * k = m :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact mod_add_div _ _ }
lemma div_add_mod' (m k : ℤ) : (m / k) * k + m % k = m :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact div_add_mod _ _ }
theorem mod_def (a b : ℤ) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq (mod_add_div _ _)
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self {a b c : ℤ} : (a + b * c) % c = a % c :=
if cz : c = 0 then by rw [cz, mul_zero, add_zero] else
by rw [mod_def, mod_def, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ cz,
mul_add, mul_comm, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self_left (a b c : ℤ) : (a + b * c) % b = a % b :=
by rw [mul_comm, add_mul_mod_self]
@[simp] theorem add_mod_self {a b : ℤ} : (a + b) % b = a % b :=
by have := add_mul_mod_self_left a b 1; rwa mul_one at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_self_left {a b : ℤ} : (a + b) % a = b % a :=
by rw [add_comm, add_mod_self]
@[simp] theorem mod_add_mod (m n k : ℤ) : (m % n + k) % n = (m + k) % n :=
by have := (add_mul_mod_self_left (m % n + k) n (m / n)).symm;
rwa [add_right_comm, mod_add_div] at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_mod (m n k : ℤ) : (m + n % k) % k = (m + n) % k :=
by rw [add_comm, mod_add_mod, add_comm]
lemma add_mod (a b n : ℤ) : (a + b) % n = ((a % n) + (b % n)) % n :=
by rw [add_mod_mod, mod_add_mod]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_right {m n k : ℤ} (i : ℤ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(m + i) % n = (k + i) % n :=
by rw [← mod_add_mod, ← mod_add_mod k, H]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_left {m n k : ℤ} (i : ℤ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _ H, add_comm]
theorem mod_add_cancel_right {m n k : ℤ} (i) : (m + i) % n = (k + i) % n ↔
m % n = k % n :=
⟨λ H, by have := add_mod_eq_add_mod_right (-i) H;
rwa [add_neg_cancel_right, add_neg_cancel_right] at this,
add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _⟩
theorem mod_add_cancel_left {m n k i : ℤ} :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n ↔ m % n = k % n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_comm i, mod_add_cancel_right]
theorem mod_sub_cancel_right {m n k : ℤ} (i) : (m - i) % n = (k - i) % n ↔
m % n = k % n :=
mod_add_cancel_right _
theorem mod_eq_mod_iff_mod_sub_eq_zero {m n k : ℤ} : m % n = k % n ↔ (m - k) % n = 0 :=
(mod_sub_cancel_right k).symm.trans $ by simp
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_left (a b : ℤ) : (a * b) % b = 0 :=
by rw [← zero_add (a * b), add_mul_mod_self, zero_mod]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_right (a b : ℤ) : (a * b) % a = 0 :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_mod_left]
lemma mul_mod (a b n : ℤ) : (a * b) % n = ((a % n) * (b % n)) % n :=
begin
conv_lhs {
rw [←mod_add_div a n, ←mod_add_div' b n, right_distrib, left_distrib, left_distrib,
mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ←left_distrib n _ _, add_mul_mod_self_left, ← mul_assoc,
add_mul_mod_self] }
end
@[simp] lemma neg_mod_two (i : ℤ) : (-i) % 2 = i % 2 :=
begin
apply int.mod_eq_mod_iff_mod_sub_eq_zero.mpr,
convert int.mul_mod_right 2 (-i),
simp only [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
end
local attribute [simp] -- Will be generalized to Euclidean domains.
theorem mod_self {a : ℤ} : a % a = 0 :=
by have := mul_mod_left 1 a; rwa one_mul at this
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (n : ℤ) {m k : ℤ} (h : m ∣ k) : n % k % m = n % m :=
begin
conv { to_rhs, rw ←mod_add_div n k },
rcases h with ⟨t, rfl⟩, rw [mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
end
@[simp] theorem mod_mod (a b : ℤ) : a % b % b = a % b :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← mod_add_div a b, add_mul_mod_self_left]}
lemma sub_mod (a b n : ℤ) : (a - b) % n = ((a % n) - (b % n)) % n :=
begin
apply (mod_add_cancel_right b).mp,
rw [sub_add_cancel, ← add_mod_mod, sub_add_cancel, mod_mod]
end
/-! ### properties of `/` and `%` -/
@[simp] theorem mul_div_mul_of_pos {a : ℤ} (b c : ℤ) (H : 0 < a) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c :=
suffices ∀ (m k : ℕ) (b : ℤ), (m.succ * b / (m.succ * k) : ℤ) = b / k, from
match a, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H, c, eq_coe_or_neg c with
| ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ._, ⟨k, or.inl rfl⟩ := this _ _ _
| ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ._, ⟨k, or.inr rfl⟩ :=
by rw [← neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, int.div_neg, int.div_neg];
apply congr_arg has_neg.neg; apply this
end,
λ m k b, match b, k with
| (n : ℕ), k := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mul_div_mul _ _ m.succ_pos)
| -[1+ n], 0 := by rw [int.coe_nat_zero, mul_zero, int.div_zero, int.div_zero]
| -[1+ n], k+1 := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
show (m.succ * n + m) / (m.succ * k.succ) = n / k.succ, begin
apply nat.div_eq_of_lt_le,
{ refine le_trans _ (nat.le_add_right _ _),
rw [← nat.mul_div_mul _ _ m.succ_pos],
apply nat.div_mul_le_self },
{ change m.succ * n.succ ≤ _,
rw [mul_left_comm],
apply nat.mul_le_mul_left,
apply (nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ k.succ_pos).1,
apply nat.lt_succ_self }
end
end
@[simp] theorem mul_div_mul_of_pos_left (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : 0 < b) (c : ℤ) :
a * b / (c * b) = a / c :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_comm c, mul_div_mul_of_pos _ _ H]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_mul_of_pos {a : ℤ} (H : 0 < a) (b c : ℤ) : a * b % (a * c) = a * (b % c) :=
by rw [mod_def, mod_def, mul_div_mul_of_pos _ _ H, mul_sub_left_distrib, mul_assoc]
theorem lt_div_add_one_mul_self (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : 0 < b) : a < (a / b + 1) * b :=
by { rw [add_mul, one_mul, mul_comm, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← mod_def],
exact mod_lt_of_pos _ H }
theorem abs_div_le_abs : ∀ (a b : ℤ), |a / b| ≤ |a| :=
suffices ∀ (a : ℤ) (n : ℕ), |a / n| ≤ |a|, from
λ a b, match b, eq_coe_or_neg b with
| ._, ⟨n, or.inl rfl⟩ := this _ _
| ._, ⟨n, or.inr rfl⟩ := by rw [int.div_neg, abs_neg]; apply this
end,
λ a n, by rw [abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs]; exact
coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le (match a, n with
| (m : ℕ), n := nat.div_le_self _ _
| -[1+ m], 0 := nat.zero_le _
| -[1+ m], n+1 := nat.succ_le_succ (nat.div_le_self _ _)
end)
theorem div_le_self {a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (Ha : 0 ≤ a) : a / b ≤ a :=
by have := le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_div_le_abs a b);
rwa [abs_of_nonneg Ha] at this
theorem mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : a % b = 0) : b * (a / b) = a :=
by have := mod_add_div a b; rwa [H, zero_add] at this
theorem div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : a % b = 0) : a / b * b = a :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero H]
lemma mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (n : ℤ) : n % 2 = 0 ∨ n % 2 = 1 :=
have h : n % 2 < 2 := abs_of_nonneg (show 0 ≤ (2 : ℤ), from dec_trivial) ▸ int.mod_lt _ dec_trivial,
have h₁ : 0 ≤ n % 2 := int.mod_nonneg _ dec_trivial,
match (n % 2), h, h₁ with
| (0 : ℕ) := λ _ _, or.inl rfl
| (1 : ℕ) := λ _ _, or.inr rfl
| (k + 2 : ℕ) := λ h _, absurd h dec_trivial
| -[1+ a] := λ _ h₁, absurd h₁ dec_trivial
end
/-! ### dvd -/
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_dvd {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) ∣ ↑n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨λ ⟨a, ae⟩, m.eq_zero_or_pos.elim
(λm0, by simp [m0] at ae; simp [ae, m0])
(λm0l, by {
cases eq_coe_of_zero_le (@nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left ℤ _ m a
(by simp [ae.symm]) (by simpa using m0l)) with k e,
subst a, exact ⟨k, int.coe_nat_inj ae⟩ }),
λ ⟨k, e⟩, dvd.intro k $ by rw [e, int.coe_nat_mul]⟩
theorem coe_nat_dvd_left {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ} : (↑n : ℤ) ∣ z ↔ n ∣ z.nat_abs :=
by rcases nat_abs_eq z with eq | eq; rw eq; simp [coe_nat_dvd]
theorem coe_nat_dvd_right {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ} : z ∣ (↑n : ℤ) ↔ z.nat_abs ∣ n :=
by rcases nat_abs_eq z with eq | eq; rw eq; simp [coe_nat_dvd]
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : 0 ≤ b) : a ∣ b → b ∣ a → a = b :=
begin
rw [← abs_of_nonneg H1, ← abs_of_nonneg H2, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
rw [coe_nat_dvd, coe_nat_dvd, coe_nat_inj'],
apply nat.dvd_antisymm
end
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : b % a = 0) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b / a, (mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero H).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ℤ}, a ∣ b → b % a = 0
| a ._ ⟨c, rfl⟩ := mul_mod_right _ _
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero (a b : ℤ) : a ∣ b ↔ b % a = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
/-- If `a % b = c` then `b` divides `a - c`. -/
lemma dvd_sub_of_mod_eq {a b c : ℤ} (h : a % b = c) : b ∣ a - c :=
begin
have hx : a % b % b = c % b, { rw h },
rw [mod_mod, ←mod_sub_cancel_right c, sub_self, zero_mod] at hx,
exact dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hx
end
theorem nat_abs_dvd {a b : ℤ} : (a.nat_abs : ℤ) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
(nat_abs_eq a).elim (λ e, by rw ← e) (λ e, by rw [← neg_dvd, ← e])
theorem dvd_nat_abs {a b : ℤ} : a ∣ b.nat_abs ↔ a ∣ b :=
(nat_abs_eq b).elim (λ e, by rw ← e) (λ e, by rw [← dvd_neg, ← e])
instance decidable_dvd : @decidable_rel ℤ (∣) :=
assume a n, decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by apply_instance) (dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).symm
protected theorem div_mul_cancel {a b : ℤ} (H : b ∣ a) : a / b * b = a :=
div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero (mod_eq_zero_of_dvd H)
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {a b : ℤ} (H : a ∣ b) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.div_mul_cancel H]
protected theorem mul_div_assoc (a : ℤ) : ∀ {b c : ℤ}, c ∣ b → (a * b) / c = a * (b / c)
| ._ c ⟨d, rfl⟩ := if cz : c = 0 then by simp [cz] else
by rw [mul_left_comm, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ cz, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ cz]
protected theorem mul_div_assoc' (b : ℤ) {a c : ℤ} (h : c ∣ a) : a * b / c = a / c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.mul_div_assoc _ h, mul_comm]
theorem div_dvd_div : ∀ {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : a ∣ b) (H2 : b ∣ c), b / a ∣ c / a
| a ._ ._ ⟨b, rfl⟩ ⟨c, rfl⟩ := if az : a = 0 then by simp [az] else
by rw [int.mul_div_cancel_left _ az, mul_assoc, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ az];
apply dvd_mul_right
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c :=
by rw [← H2, int.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ≠ 0) (H2 : a = b * c) :
a / b = c :=
by rw [H2, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
protected theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : a ≠ 0) (H2 : a * b = c) :
b = c / a :=
eq.symm $ int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H1 H2.symm
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
⟨int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = c * b :=
by rw mul_comm; exact int.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_left {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H1 H2]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ≠ 0) (H2 : a = c * b) :
a / b = c :=
int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H1 (by rw [mul_comm, H2])
protected lemma eq_zero_of_div_eq_zero {d n : ℤ} (h : d ∣ n) (H : n / d = 0) : n = 0 :=
by rw [← int.mul_div_cancel' h, H, mul_zero]
theorem neg_div_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ℤ} (H : b ∣ a), -a / b = -(a / b)
| ._ b ⟨c, rfl⟩ := if bz : b = 0 then by simp [bz] else
by rw [neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ bz, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ bz]
lemma sub_div_of_dvd (a : ℤ) {b c : ℤ} (hcb : c ∣ b) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
begin
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, int.add_div_of_dvd_right ((dvd_neg c b).mpr hcb)],
congr,
exact neg_div_of_dvd hcb,
end
lemma sub_div_of_dvd_sub {a b c : ℤ} (hcab : c ∣ (a - b)) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
by rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← int.add_div_of_dvd_left hcab, sub_add_cancel]
theorem div_sign : ∀ a b, a / sign b = a * sign b
| a (n+1:ℕ) := by unfold sign; simp
| a 0 := by simp [sign]
| a -[1+ n] := by simp [sign]
@[simp] theorem sign_mul : ∀ a b, sign (a * b) = sign a * sign b
| a 0 := by simp
| 0 b := by simp
| (m+1:ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := rfl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := rfl
protected theorem sign_eq_div_abs (a : ℤ) : sign a = a / |a| :=
if az : a = 0 then by simp [az] else
(int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (mt abs_eq_zero.1 az)
(sign_mul_abs _).symm).symm
theorem mul_sign : ∀ (i : ℤ), i * sign i = nat_abs i
| (n+1:ℕ) := mul_one _
| 0 := mul_zero _
| -[1+ n] := mul_neg_one _
@[simp]
theorem sign_pow_bit1 (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℤ, n.sign ^ (bit1 k) = n.sign
| (n+1:ℕ) := one_pow (bit1 k)
| 0 := zero_pow (nat.zero_lt_bit1 k)
| -[1+ n] := (neg_pow_bit1 1 k).trans (congr_arg (λ x, -x) (one_pow (bit1 k)))
theorem le_of_dvd {a b : ℤ} (bpos : 0 < b) (H : a ∣ b) : a ≤ b :=
match a, b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt bpos, H with
| (m : ℕ), ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H := coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le $
nat.le_of_dvd n.succ_pos $ coe_nat_dvd.1 H
| -[1+ m], ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, _ :=
le_trans (le_of_lt $ neg_succ_lt_zero _) (coe_zero_le _)
end
theorem eq_one_of_dvd_one {a : ℤ} (H : 0 ≤ a) (H' : a ∣ 1) : a = 1 :=
match a, eq_coe_of_zero_le H, H' with
| ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H' := congr_arg coe $
nat.eq_one_of_dvd_one $ coe_nat_dvd.1 H'
end
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right {a b : ℤ} (H : 0 ≤ a) (H' : a * b = 1) : a = 1 :=
eq_one_of_dvd_one H ⟨b, H'.symm⟩
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_left {a b : ℤ} (H : 0 ≤ b) (H' : a * b = 1) : b = 1 :=
eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right H (by rw [mul_comm, H'])
lemma of_nat_dvd_of_dvd_nat_abs {a : ℕ} : ∀ {z : ℤ} (haz : a ∣ z.nat_abs), ↑a ∣ z
| (int.of_nat _) haz := int.coe_nat_dvd.2 haz
| -[1+k] haz :=
begin
change ↑a ∣ -(k+1 : ℤ),
apply dvd_neg_of_dvd,
apply int.coe_nat_dvd.2,
exact haz
end
lemma dvd_nat_abs_of_of_nat_dvd {a : ℕ} : ∀ {z : ℤ} (haz : ↑a ∣ z), a ∣ z.nat_abs
| (int.of_nat _) haz := int.coe_nat_dvd.1 (int.dvd_nat_abs.2 haz)
| -[1+k] haz :=
have haz' : (↑a:ℤ) ∣ (↑(k+1):ℤ), from dvd_of_dvd_neg haz,
int.coe_nat_dvd.1 haz'
lemma pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd {p m n : ℕ} {k : ℤ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hdiv : ↑(p ^ n) ∣ k) :
↑(p ^ m) ∣ k :=
begin
induction k,
{ apply int.coe_nat_dvd.2,
apply pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hmn,
apply int.coe_nat_dvd.1 hdiv },
change -[1+k] with -(↑(k+1) : ℤ),
apply dvd_neg_of_dvd,
apply int.coe_nat_dvd.2,
apply pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hmn,
apply int.coe_nat_dvd.1,
apply dvd_of_dvd_neg,
exact hdiv,
end
lemma dvd_of_pow_dvd {p k : ℕ} {m : ℤ} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hpk : ↑(p^k) ∣ m) : ↑p ∣ m :=
by rw ←pow_one p; exact pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hk hpk
/-- If `n > 0` then `m` is not divisible by `n` iff it is between `n * k` and `n * (k + 1)`
for some `k`. -/
lemma exists_lt_and_lt_iff_not_dvd (m : ℤ) {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(∃ k, n * k < m ∧ m < n * (k + 1)) ↔ ¬ n ∣ m :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨k, h1k, h2k⟩ ⟨l, rfl⟩, rw [mul_lt_mul_left hn] at h1k h2k,
rw [lt_add_one_iff, ← not_lt] at h2k, exact h2k h1k },
{ intro h, rw [dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, ← ne.def] at h,
have := (mod_nonneg m hn.ne.symm).lt_of_ne h.symm,
simp only [← mod_add_div m n] {single_pass := tt},
refine ⟨m / n, lt_add_of_pos_left _ this, _⟩,
rw [add_comm _ (1 : ℤ), left_distrib, mul_one], exact add_lt_add_right (mod_lt_of_pos _ hn) _ }
end
/-! ### `/` and ordering -/
protected theorem div_mul_le (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a / b * b ≤ a :=
le_of_sub_nonneg $ by rw [mul_comm, ← mod_def]; apply mod_nonneg _ H
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) (H' : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right (le_trans (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H)) H') H
protected theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) (H3 : a < b / c) : a * c < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.div_le_of_le_mul H) (not_le_of_gt H3)
protected theorem mul_le_of_le_div {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 < c) (H2 : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b :=
le_trans (decidable.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H2 (le_of_lt H1)) (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H1))
protected theorem le_div_of_mul_le {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 < c) (H2 : a * c ≤ b) : a ≤ b / c :=
le_of_lt_add_one $ lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right
(lt_of_le_of_lt H2 (lt_div_add_one_mul_self _ H1)) (le_of_lt H1)
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) : a ≤ b / c ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨int.mul_le_of_le_div H, int.le_div_of_mul_le H⟩
protected theorem div_le_div {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) (H' : a ≤ b) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
int.le_div_of_mul_le H (le_trans (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H)) H')
protected theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) (H' : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.mul_le_of_le_div H) (not_le_of_gt H')
protected theorem lt_mul_of_div_lt {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 < c) (H2 : a / c < b) : a < b * c :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.le_div_of_mul_le H1) (not_le_of_gt H2)
protected theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : 0 < c) : a / c < b ↔ a < b * c :=
⟨int.lt_mul_of_div_lt H, int.div_lt_of_lt_mul H⟩
protected theorem le_mul_of_div_le {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ b) (H2 : b ∣ a) (H3 : a / b ≤ c) :
a ≤ c * b :=
by rw [← int.div_mul_cancel H2]; exact decidable.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H3 H1
protected theorem lt_div_of_mul_lt {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ b) (H2 : b ∣ c) (H3 : a * b < c) :
a < c / b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.le_mul_of_div_le H1 H2) (not_le_of_gt H3)
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt {a b : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (H : 0 < c) (H' : c ∣ b) :
a < b / c ↔ a * c < b :=
⟨int.mul_lt_of_lt_div H, int.lt_div_of_mul_lt (le_of_lt H) H'⟩
theorem div_pos_of_pos_of_dvd {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 < a) (H2 : 0 ≤ b) (H3 : b ∣ a) : 0 < a / b :=
int.lt_div_of_mul_lt H2 H3 (by rwa zero_mul)
theorem div_eq_div_of_mul_eq_mul {a b c d : ℤ} (H2 : d ∣ c) (H3 : b ≠ 0)
(H4 : d ≠ 0) (H5 : a * d = b * c) :
a / b = c / d :=
int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H3 $
by rw [← int.mul_div_assoc _ H2]; exact
(int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left H4 H5.symm).symm
theorem eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left {a b c d : ℤ} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hbc : b ∣ c)
(h : b * a = c * d) :
a = c / b * d :=
begin
cases hbc with k hk,
subst hk,
rw [int.mul_div_cancel_left _ hb],
rw mul_assoc at h,
apply mul_left_cancel₀ hb h
end
/-- If an integer with larger absolute value divides an integer, it is
zero. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nat_abs_lt_nat_abs {a b : ℤ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : nat_abs b < nat_abs a) :
b = 0 :=
begin
rw [←nat_abs_dvd, ←dvd_nat_abs, coe_nat_dvd] at w,
rw ←nat_abs_eq_zero,
exact eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt w h
end
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nonneg_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (w₁ : 0 ≤ a) (w₂ : a < b) (h : b ∣ a) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nat_abs_lt_nat_abs h (nat_abs_lt_nat_abs_of_nonneg_of_lt w₁ w₂)
/-- If two integers are congruent to a sufficiently large modulus,
they are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_mod_eq_of_nat_abs_sub_lt_nat_abs {a b c : ℤ} (h1 : a % b = c)
(h2 : nat_abs (a - c) < nat_abs b) :
a = c :=
eq_of_sub_eq_zero (eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nat_abs_lt_nat_abs (dvd_sub_of_mod_eq h1) h2)
theorem of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n.succ) :
of_nat m + -[1+n] = -[1+ n - m] :=
begin
change sub_nat_nat _ _ = _,
have h' : n.succ - m = (n - m).succ,
apply succ_sub,
apply le_of_lt_succ h,
simp [*, sub_nat_nat]
end
theorem of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_ge {m n : ℕ}
(h : n.succ ≤ m) : of_nat m + -[1+n] = of_nat (m - n.succ) :=
begin
change sub_nat_nat _ _ = _,
have h' : n.succ - m = 0,
apply nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h,
simp [*, sub_nat_nat]
end
@[simp] theorem neg_add_neg (m n : ℕ) : -[1+m] + -[1+n] = -[1+nat.succ(m+n)] := rfl
/-! ### to_nat -/
theorem to_nat_eq_max : ∀ (a : ℤ), (to_nat a : ℤ) = max a 0
| (n : ℕ) := (max_eq_left (coe_zero_le n)).symm
| -[1+ n] := (max_eq_right (le_of_lt (neg_succ_lt_zero n))).symm
@[simp] lemma to_nat_zero : (0 : ℤ).to_nat = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_nat_one : (1 : ℤ).to_nat = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem to_nat_of_nonneg {a : ℤ} (h : 0 ≤ a) : (to_nat a : ℤ) = a :=
by rw [to_nat_eq_max, max_eq_left h]
@[simp] lemma to_nat_sub_of_le {a b : ℤ} (h : b ≤ a) : (to_nat (a - b) : ℤ) = a - b :=
int.to_nat_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le h)
@[simp] theorem to_nat_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : to_nat ↑n = n := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_nat_coe_nat_add_one {n : ℕ} : ((n : ℤ) + 1).to_nat = n + 1 := rfl
theorem le_to_nat (a : ℤ) : a ≤ to_nat a :=
by rw [to_nat_eq_max]; apply le_max_left
@[simp] theorem to_nat_le {a : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : to_nat a ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n :=
by rw [(coe_nat_le_coe_nat_iff _ _).symm, to_nat_eq_max, max_le_iff];
exact and_iff_left (coe_zero_le _)
@[simp] theorem lt_to_nat {n : ℕ} {a : ℤ} : n < to_nat a ↔ (n : ℤ) < a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 to_nat_le
theorem to_nat_le_to_nat {a b : ℤ} (h : a ≤ b) : to_nat a ≤ to_nat b :=
by rw to_nat_le; exact le_trans h (le_to_nat b)
theorem to_nat_lt_to_nat {a b : ℤ} (hb : 0 < b) : to_nat a < to_nat b ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ h, begin cases a, exact lt_to_nat.1 h, exact lt_trans (neg_succ_of_nat_lt_zero a) hb, end,
λ h, begin rw lt_to_nat, cases a, exact h, exact hb end⟩
theorem lt_of_to_nat_lt {a b : ℤ} (h : to_nat a < to_nat b) : a < b :=
(to_nat_lt_to_nat $ lt_to_nat.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h).1 h
lemma to_nat_add {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(a + b).to_nat = a.to_nat + b.to_nat :=
begin
lift a to ℕ using ha,
lift b to ℕ using hb,
norm_cast,
end
lemma to_nat_add_nat {a : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : (a + n).to_nat = a.to_nat + n :=
begin
lift a to ℕ using ha,
norm_cast,
end
@[simp]
lemma pred_to_nat : ∀ (i : ℤ), (i - 1).to_nat = i.to_nat - 1
| (0:ℕ) := rfl
| (n+1:ℕ) := by simp
| -[1+ n] := rfl
@[simp]
lemma to_nat_pred_coe_of_pos {i : ℤ} (h : 0 < i) : ((i.to_nat - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = i - 1 :=
by simp [h, le_of_lt h] with push_cast
@[simp] lemma to_nat_sub_to_nat_neg : ∀ (n : ℤ), ↑n.to_nat - ↑((-n).to_nat) = n
| (0 : ℕ) := rfl
| (n+1 : ℕ) := show ↑(n+1) - (0:ℤ) = n+1, from sub_zero _
| -[1+ n] := show 0 - (n+1 : ℤ) = _, from zero_sub _
@[simp] lemma to_nat_add_to_nat_neg_eq_nat_abs : ∀ (n : ℤ), (n.to_nat) + ((-n).to_nat) = n.nat_abs
| (0 : ℕ) := rfl
| (n+1 : ℕ) := show (n+1) + 0 = n+1, from add_zero _
| -[1+ n] := show 0 + (n+1) = n+1, from zero_add _
/-- If `n : ℕ`, then `int.to_nat' n = some n`, if `n : ℤ` is negative, then `int.to_nat' n = none`.
-/
def to_nat' : ℤ → option ℕ
| (n : ℕ) := some n
| -[1+ n] := none
theorem mem_to_nat' : ∀ (a : ℤ) (n : ℕ), n ∈ to_nat' a ↔ a = n
| (m : ℕ) n := option.some_inj.trans coe_nat_inj'.symm
| -[1+ m] n := by split; intro h; cases h
lemma to_nat_of_nonpos : ∀ {z : ℤ}, z ≤ 0 → z.to_nat = 0
| (0 : ℕ) := λ _, rfl
| (n + 1 : ℕ) := λ h, (h.not_lt (by { exact_mod_cast nat.succ_pos n })).elim
| (-[1+ n]) := λ _, rfl
/-! ### units -/
@[simp] theorem units_nat_abs (u : units ℤ) : nat_abs u = 1 :=
units.ext_iff.1 $ nat.units_eq_one ⟨nat_abs u, nat_abs ↑u⁻¹,
by rw [← nat_abs_mul, units.mul_inv]; refl,
by rw [← nat_abs_mul, units.inv_mul]; refl⟩
theorem units_eq_one_or (u : units ℤ) : u = 1 ∨ u = -1 :=
by simpa only [units.ext_iff, units_nat_abs] using nat_abs_eq u
lemma is_unit_eq_one_or {a : ℤ} : is_unit a → a = 1 ∨ a = -1
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := hx ▸ (units_eq_one_or _).imp (congr_arg coe) (congr_arg coe)
lemma is_unit_iff {a : ℤ} : is_unit a ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, is_unit_eq_one_or h, λ h, _⟩,
rcases h with rfl | rfl,
{ exact is_unit_one },
{ exact is_unit_one.neg }
end
theorem is_unit_iff_nat_abs_eq {n : ℤ} : is_unit n ↔ n.nat_abs = 1 :=
by simp [nat_abs_eq_iff, is_unit_iff]
lemma units_inv_eq_self (u : units ℤ) : u⁻¹ = u :=
(units_eq_one_or u).elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl) (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl)
@[simp] lemma units_mul_self (u : units ℤ) : u * u = 1 :=
(units_eq_one_or u).elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl) (λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl)
-- `units.coe_mul` is a "wrong turn" for the simplifier, this undoes it and simplifies further
@[simp] lemma units_coe_mul_self (u : units ℤ) : (u * u : ℤ) = 1 :=
by rw [←units.coe_mul, units_mul_self, units.coe_one]
@[simp] lemma neg_one_pow_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (-1 : ℤ)^n ≠ 0 :=
pow_ne_zero _ (abs_pos.mp trivial)
/-! ### bitwise ops -/
@[simp] lemma bodd_zero : bodd 0 = ff := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_one : bodd 1 = tt := rfl
lemma bodd_two : bodd 2 = ff := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma bodd_coe (n : ℕ) : int.bodd n = nat.bodd n := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_sub_nat_nat (m n : ℕ) : bodd (sub_nat_nat m n) = bxor m.bodd n.bodd :=
by apply sub_nat_nat_elim m n (λ m n i, bodd i = bxor m.bodd n.bodd); intros;
simp; cases i.bodd; simp
@[simp] lemma bodd_neg_of_nat (n : ℕ) : bodd (neg_of_nat n) = n.bodd :=
by cases n; simp; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_neg (n : ℤ) : bodd (-n) = bodd n :=
by cases n; simp [has_neg.neg, int.coe_nat_eq, int.neg, bodd, -of_nat_eq_coe]
@[simp] lemma bodd_add (m n : ℤ) : bodd (m + n) = bxor (bodd m) (bodd n) :=
by cases m with m m; cases n with n n; unfold has_add.add;
simp [int.add, -of_nat_eq_coe, bool.bxor_comm]
@[simp] lemma bodd_mul (m n : ℤ) : bodd (m * n) = bodd m && bodd n :=
by cases m with m m; cases n with n n;
simp [← int.mul_def, int.mul, -of_nat_eq_coe, bool.bxor_comm]
theorem bodd_add_div2 : ∀ n, cond (bodd n) 1 0 + 2 * div2 n = n
| (n : ℕ) :=
by rw [show (cond (bodd n) 1 0 : ℤ) = (cond (bodd n) 1 0 : ℕ),
by cases bodd n; refl]; exact congr_arg of_nat n.bodd_add_div2
| -[1+ n] := begin
refine eq.trans _ (congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat n.bodd_add_div2),
dsimp [bodd], cases nat.bodd n; dsimp [cond, bnot, div2, int.mul],
{ change -[1+ 2 * nat.div2 n] = _, rw zero_add },
{ rw [zero_add, add_comm], refl }
end
theorem div2_val : ∀ n, div2 n = n / 2
| (n : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat n.div2_val
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat n.div2_val
lemma bit0_val (n : ℤ) : bit0 n = 2 * n := (two_mul _).symm
lemma bit1_val (n : ℤ) : bit1 n = 2 * n + 1 := congr_arg (+(1:ℤ)) (bit0_val _)
lemma bit_val (b n) : bit b n = 2 * n + cond b 1 0 :=
by { cases b, apply (bit0_val n).trans (add_zero _).symm, apply bit1_val }
lemma bit_decomp (n : ℤ) : bit (bodd n) (div2 n) = n :=
(bit_val _ _).trans $ (add_comm _ _).trans $ bodd_add_div2 _
/-- Defines a function from `ℤ` conditionally, if it is defined for odd and even integers separately
using `bit`. -/
def {u} bit_cases_on {C : ℤ → Sort u} (n) (h : ∀ b n, C (bit b n)) : C n :=
by rw [← bit_decomp n]; apply h
@[simp] lemma bit_zero : bit ff 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma bit_coe_nat (b) (n : ℕ) : bit b n = nat.bit b n :=
by rw [bit_val, nat.bit_val]; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma bit_neg_succ (b) (n : ℕ) : bit b -[1+ n] = -[1+ nat.bit (bnot b) n] :=
by rw [bit_val, nat.bit_val]; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit (b n) : bodd (bit b n) = b :=
by rw bit_val; simp; cases b; cases bodd n; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit0 (n : ℤ) : bodd (bit0 n) = ff := bodd_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit1 (n : ℤ) : bodd (bit1 n) = tt := bodd_bit tt n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit (b n) : div2 (bit b n) = n :=
begin
rw [bit_val, div2_val, add_comm, int.add_mul_div_left, (_ : (_/2:ℤ) = 0), zero_add],
cases b,
{ simp },
{ show of_nat _ = _, rw nat.div_eq_zero; simp },
{ cc }
end
lemma bit0_ne_bit1 (m n : ℤ) : bit0 m ≠ bit1 n :=
mt (congr_arg bodd) $ by simp
lemma bit1_ne_bit0 (m n : ℤ) : bit1 m ≠ bit0 n :=
(bit0_ne_bit1 _ _).symm
lemma bit1_ne_zero (m : ℤ) : bit1 m ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [bit0_zero] using bit1_ne_bit0 m 0
@[simp] lemma test_bit_zero (b) : ∀ n, test_bit (bit b n) 0 = b
| (n : ℕ) := by rw [bit_coe_nat]; apply nat.test_bit_zero
| -[1+ n] := by rw [bit_neg_succ]; dsimp [test_bit]; rw [nat.test_bit_zero];
clear test_bit_zero; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma test_bit_succ (m b) : ∀ n, test_bit (bit b n) (nat.succ m) = test_bit n m
| (n : ℕ) := by rw [bit_coe_nat]; apply nat.test_bit_succ
| -[1+ n] := by rw [bit_neg_succ]; dsimp [test_bit]; rw [nat.test_bit_succ]
private meta def bitwise_tac : tactic unit := `[
funext m,
funext n,
cases m with m m; cases n with n n; try {refl},
all_goals {
apply congr_arg of_nat <|> apply congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat,
try {dsimp [nat.land, nat.ldiff, nat.lor]},
try {rw [
show nat.bitwise (λ a b, a && bnot b) n m =
nat.bitwise (λ a b, b && bnot a) m n, from
congr_fun (congr_fun (@nat.bitwise_swap (λ a b, b && bnot a) rfl) n) m]},
apply congr_arg (λ f, nat.bitwise f m n),
funext a,
funext b,
cases a; cases b; refl },
all_goals {unfold nat.land nat.ldiff nat.lor}
]
theorem bitwise_or : bitwise bor = lor := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_and : bitwise band = land := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_diff : bitwise (λ a b, a && bnot b) = ldiff := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_xor : bitwise bxor = lxor := by bitwise_tac
@[simp] lemma bitwise_bit (f : bool → bool → bool) (a m b n) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) :=
begin
cases m with m m; cases n with n n;
repeat { rw [← int.coe_nat_eq] <|> rw bit_coe_nat <|> rw bit_neg_succ };
unfold bitwise nat_bitwise bnot;
[ induction h : f ff ff,
induction h : f ff tt,
induction h : f tt ff,
induction h : f tt tt ],
all_goals {
unfold cond, rw nat.bitwise_bit,
repeat { rw bit_coe_nat <|> rw bit_neg_succ <|> rw bnot_bnot } },
all_goals { unfold bnot {fail_if_unchanged := ff}; rw h; refl }
end
@[simp] lemma lor_bit (a m b n) : lor (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a || b) (lor m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_or, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma land_bit (a m b n) : land (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && b) (land m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_and, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma ldiff_bit (a m b n) : ldiff (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && bnot b) (ldiff m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_diff, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma lxor_bit (a m b n) : lxor (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (bxor a b) (lxor m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_xor, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma lnot_bit (b) : ∀ n, lnot (bit b n) = bit (bnot b) (lnot n)
| (n : ℕ) := by simp [lnot]
| -[1+ n] := by simp [lnot]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_bitwise (f : bool → bool → bool) (m n k) :
test_bit (bitwise f m n) k = f (test_bit m k) (test_bit n k) :=
begin
induction k with k IH generalizing m n;
apply bit_cases_on m; intros a m';
apply bit_cases_on n; intros b n';
rw bitwise_bit,
{ simp [test_bit_zero] },
{ simp [test_bit_succ, IH] }
end
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lor (m n k) : test_bit (lor m n) k = test_bit m k || test_bit n k :=
by rw [← bitwise_or, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_land (m n k) : test_bit (land m n) k = test_bit m k && test_bit n k :=
by rw [← bitwise_and, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp]
lemma test_bit_ldiff (m n k) : test_bit (ldiff m n) k = test_bit m k && bnot (test_bit n k) :=
by rw [← bitwise_diff, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lxor (m n k) : test_bit (lxor m n) k = bxor (test_bit m k) (test_bit n k) :=
by rw [← bitwise_xor, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lnot : ∀ n k, test_bit (lnot n) k = bnot (test_bit n k)
| (n : ℕ) k := by simp [lnot, test_bit]
| -[1+ n] k := by simp [lnot, test_bit]
lemma shiftl_add : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ), shiftl m (n + k) = shiftl (shiftl m n) k
| (m : ℕ) n (k:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.shiftl_add _ _ _)
| -[1+ m] n (k:ℕ) := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat (nat.shiftl'_add _ _ _ _)
| (m : ℕ) n -[1+k] := sub_nat_nat_elim n k.succ
(λ n k i, shiftl ↑m i = nat.shiftr (nat.shiftl m n) k)
(λ i n, congr_arg coe $
by rw [← nat.shiftl_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]; apply nat.le_add_right)
(λ i n, congr_arg coe $
by rw [add_assoc, nat.shiftr_add, ← nat.shiftl_sub, nat.sub_self]; refl)
| -[1+ m] n -[1+k] := sub_nat_nat_elim n k.succ
(λ n k i, shiftl -[1+ m] i = -[1+ nat.shiftr (nat.shiftl' tt m n) k])
(λ i n, congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
by rw [← nat.shiftl'_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]; apply nat.le_add_right)
(λ i n, congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
by rw [add_assoc, nat.shiftr_add, ← nat.shiftl'_sub, nat.sub_self]; refl)
lemma shiftl_sub (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ) : shiftl m (n - k) = shiftr (shiftl m n) k :=
shiftl_add _ _ _
@[simp] lemma shiftl_neg (m n : ℤ) : shiftl m (-n) = shiftr m n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftr_neg (m n : ℤ) : shiftr m (-n) = shiftl m n := by rw [← shiftl_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma shiftl_coe_nat (m n : ℕ) : shiftl m n = nat.shiftl m n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftr_coe_nat (m n : ℕ) : shiftr m n = nat.shiftr m n := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma shiftl_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : shiftl -[1+ m] n = -[1+ nat.shiftl' tt m n] := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftr_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : shiftr -[1+ m] n = -[1+ nat.shiftr m n] := by cases n; refl
lemma shiftr_add : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n k : ℕ), shiftr m (n + k) = shiftr (shiftr m n) k
| (m : ℕ) n k := by rw [shiftr_coe_nat, shiftr_coe_nat,
← int.coe_nat_add, shiftr_coe_nat, nat.shiftr_add]
| -[1+ m] n k := by rw [shiftr_neg_succ, shiftr_neg_succ,
← int.coe_nat_add, shiftr_neg_succ, nat.shiftr_add]
lemma shiftl_eq_mul_pow : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ), shiftl m n = m * ↑(2 ^ n)
| (m : ℕ) n := congr_arg coe (nat.shiftl_eq_mul_pow _ _)
| -[1+ m] n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λi, -i) (nat.shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow _ _)
lemma shiftr_eq_div_pow : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ), shiftr m n = m / ↑(2 ^ n)
| (m : ℕ) n := by rw shiftr_coe_nat; exact congr_arg coe (nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow _ _)
| -[1+ m] n := begin
rw [shiftr_neg_succ, neg_succ_of_nat_div, nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow], refl,
exact coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt (pow_pos dec_trivial _)
end
lemma one_shiftl (n : ℕ) : shiftl 1 n = (2 ^ n : ℕ) :=
congr_arg coe (nat.one_shiftl _)
@[simp] lemma zero_shiftl : ∀ n : ℤ, shiftl 0 n = 0
| (n : ℕ) := congr_arg coe (nat.zero_shiftl _)
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg coe (nat.zero_shiftr _)
@[simp] lemma zero_shiftr (n) : shiftr 0 n = 0 := zero_shiftl _
end int
attribute [irreducible] int.nonneg
|
4d056169a3842fb36299ba8f9faaac42ebcd2585 | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/data/nat/digits.lean | 5d7602b9f3ee016b640d5d69e2109a2110a39d7a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,833 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.int.modeq
import data.list.indexes
import tactic.interval_cases
import tactic.linarith
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
A basic `norm_digits` tactic is also provided for proving goals of the form
`nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b` are numerals.
-/
namespace nat
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digits_aux_0 : ℕ → list ℕ
| 0 := []
| (n+1) := [n+1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digits_aux_1 (n : ℕ) : list ℕ := list.repeat 1 n
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digits_aux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → list ℕ
| 0 := []
| (n+1) :=
have (n+1)/b < n+1 := nat.div_lt_self (nat.succ_pos _) h,
(n+1) % b :: digits_aux ((n+1)/b)
@[simp] lemma digits_aux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digits_aux b h 0 = [] := by rw digits_aux
lemma digits_aux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digits_aux b h n = n % b :: digits_aux b h (n/b) :=
begin
cases n,
{ cases w, },
{ rw [digits_aux], }
end
/--
`digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `of_digits b L = L.foldr (λ x y, x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = list.repeat 1 n`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `nat.to_digits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `nat.to_digits b 0 = [0]`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| 0 := digits_aux_0
| 1 := digits_aux_1
| (b+2) := digits_aux (b+2) (by norm_num)
@[simp] lemma digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] :=
by rcases b with _|⟨_|⟨_⟩⟩; simp [digits, digits_aux_0, digits_aux_1]
@[simp] lemma digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 (n.succ) = [n+1] := rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ} (w : 0 < n), digits 0 n = [n]
| 0 h := absurd h dec_trivial
| (n+1) _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = list.repeat 1 n := rfl
@[simp] lemma digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n := rfl
@[simp] lemma digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b+2) (n+1) = (((n+1) % (b+2)) :: digits (b+2) ((n+1) / (b+2))) :=
by { rw [digits, digits_aux_def], exact succ_pos n }
theorem digits_def' : ∀ {b : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ b) {n : ℕ} (w : 0 < n),
digits b n = n % b :: digits b (n/b)
| 0 h := absurd h dec_trivial
| 1 h := absurd h dec_trivial
| (b+2) h := digits_aux_def _ _
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (w₁ : 0 < x) (w₂ : x < b) : digits b x = [x] :=
begin
cases b,
{ cases w₂ },
{ cases b,
{ interval_cases x, },
{ cases x,
{ cases w₁, },
{ rw [digits_add_two_add_one, nat.div_eq_of_lt w₂, digits_zero, nat.mod_eq_of_lt w₂] } } }
end
lemma digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (x y : ℕ) (w : x < b) (w' : 0 < x ∨ 0 < y) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y :=
begin
cases b,
{ cases h, },
{ cases b,
{ norm_num at h, },
{ cases y,
{ norm_num at w',
simp [w, w'], },
dsimp [digits],
rw digits_aux_def,
{ congr,
{ simp [nat.add_mod, nat.mod_eq_of_lt w], },
{ simp [mul_comm (b+2), nat.add_mul_div_right, nat.div_eq_of_lt w], }
},
{ apply nat.succ_pos, }, }, },
end
/--
`of_digits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
def of_digits {α : Type*} [semiring α] (b : α) : list ℕ → α
| [] := 0
| (h :: t) := h + b * of_digits t
lemma of_digits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [semiring α] (b : α) (L : list ℕ) :
of_digits b L = L.foldr (λ x y, x + b * y) 0 :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ refl, },
{ dsimp [of_digits], rw ih, },
end
lemma of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux (b : ℕ) (l : list ℕ) :
((list.range l.length).zip_with ((λ (i a : ℕ), a * b ^ i) ∘ succ) l).sum =
b * ((list.range l.length).zip_with (λ i a, a * b ^ i) l).sum :=
begin
suffices : (list.range l.length).zip_with (((λ (i a : ℕ), a * b ^ i) ∘ succ)) l =
(list.range l.length).zip_with (λ i a, b * (a * b ^ i)) l,
{ simp [this] },
congr,
ext,
simp [pow_succ],
ring
end
lemma of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index (b : ℕ) (L : list ℕ):
of_digits b L = (L.map_with_index (λ i a, a * b ^ i)).sum :=
begin
rw [list.map_with_index_eq_enum_map, list.enum_eq_zip_range,
list.map_uncurry_zip_eq_zip_with, of_digits_eq_foldr],
induction L with hd tl hl,
{ simp },
{ simpa [list.range_succ_eq_map, list.zip_with_map_left, of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux]
using or.inl hl }
end
@[simp] lemma of_digits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : of_digits b [n] = n := by simp [of_digits]
@[simp] lemma of_digits_one_cons {α : Type*} [semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : list ℕ) :
of_digits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + of_digits 1 L :=
by simp [of_digits]
lemma of_digits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : list ℕ} :
of_digits b (l1 ++ l2) = of_digits b l1 + b^(l1.length) * of_digits b l2 :=
begin
induction l1 with hd tl IH,
{ simp [of_digits] },
{ rw [of_digits, list.cons_append, of_digits, IH, list.length_cons, pow_succ'],
ring }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_of_digits (α : Type*) [semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : list ℕ) :
((of_digits b L : ℕ) : α) = of_digits (b : α) L :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ refl, },
{ dsimp [of_digits], push_cast, rw ih, }
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_int_of_digits (b : ℕ) (L : list ℕ) :
((of_digits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = of_digits (b : ℤ) L :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ refl, },
{ dsimp [of_digits], push_cast, rw ih, }
end
lemma digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : 1 ≤ b) {L : list ℕ} (w : of_digits b L = 0) :
∀ l ∈ L, l = 0 :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ intros l m,
cases m, },
{ intros l m,
dsimp [of_digits] at w,
rcases m with ⟨rfl⟩,
{ convert nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right w, simp, },
{ exact ih ((nat.mul_right_inj h).mp (nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left w)) _ m, }, }
end
lemma digits_of_digits
(b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (L : list ℕ)
(w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b) (w₂ : ∀ (h : L ≠ []), L.last h ≠ 0) :
digits b (of_digits b L) = L :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ dsimp [of_digits], simp },
{ dsimp [of_digits],
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp),
rw digits_add b h,
{ rw ih,
{ simp, },
{ intros l m, apply w₁, exact list.mem_cons_of_mem _ m, },
{ intro h,
{ rw [list.last_cons _ h] at w₂,
convert w₂, }}},
{ convert w₁ d (list.mem_cons_self _ _), simp, },
{ by_cases h' : L = [],
{ rcases h' with rfl,
simp at w₂,
left,
apply nat.pos_of_ne_zero,
convert w₂, simp, },
{ right,
apply nat.pos_of_ne_zero,
contrapose! w₂,
apply digits_zero_of_eq_zero _ w₂,
{ rw list.last_cons _ h',
exact list.last_mem h', },
{ exact le_of_lt h, }, }, }, },
end
lemma of_digits_digits (b n : ℕ) : of_digits b (digits b n) = n :=
begin
cases b with b,
{ cases n with n,
{ refl, },
{ change of_digits 0 [n+1] = n+1,
dsimp [of_digits],
simp, } },
{ cases b with b,
{ induction n with n ih,
{ refl, },
{ simp only [ih, add_comm 1, of_digits_one_cons, nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ], } },
{ apply nat.strong_induction_on n _, clear n,
intros n h,
cases n,
{ rw digits_zero, refl, },
{ simp only [nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one],
dsimp [of_digits],
rw h _ (nat.div_lt_self' n b),
rw [nat.cast_id, nat.mod_add_div], }, }, },
end
lemma of_digits_one (L : list ℕ) : of_digits 1 L = L.sum :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ refl, },
{ simp [of_digits, list.sum_cons, ih], }
end
/-!
### Properties
This section contains various lemmas of properties relating to `digits` and `of_digits`.
-/
lemma digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have : of_digits b (digits b n) = of_digits b [], by rw h,
convert this,
rw of_digits_digits },
{ rintro rfl,
simp }
end
lemma digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
private lemma digits_last_aux {b n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ b) (w : 0 < n) :
digits b n = ((n % b) :: digits b (n / b)) :=
begin
rcases b with _|_|b,
{ finish },
{ norm_num at h },
rcases n with _|n,
{ norm_num at w },
simp,
end
lemma digits_last {b m : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ b) (hm : 0 < m) (p q) :
(digits b m).last p = (digits b (m/b)).last q :=
by { simp only [digits_last_aux h hm], rw list.last_cons }
lemma digits.injective (b : ℕ) : function.injective b.digits :=
function.left_inverse.injective (of_digits_digits b)
@[simp] lemma digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} :
b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
lemma last_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).last (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 :=
begin
rcases b with _|_|b,
{ cases m; finish },
{ cases m, { finish },
simp_rw [digits_one, list.last_repeat_succ 1 m],
norm_num },
revert hm,
apply nat.strong_induction_on m,
intros n IH hn,
have hnpos : 0 < n := nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn,
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2,
{ simp_rw [digits_of_lt b.succ.succ n hnpos hnb],
exact pos_iff_ne_zero.mp hnpos },
{ rw digits_last (show 2 ≤ b + 2, from dec_trivial) hnpos,
refine IH _ (nat.div_lt_self hnpos dec_trivial) _,
{ rw ←pos_iff_ne_zero,
exact nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) dec_trivial } },
end
/-- The digits in the base b+2 expansion of n are all less than b+2 -/
lemma digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b+2) m → d < b+2 :=
begin
apply nat.strong_induction_on m,
intros n IH d hd,
cases n with n,
{ rw digits_zero at hd, cases hd }, -- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw digits_add_two_add_one at hd,
cases hd,
{ rw hd, exact n.succ.mod_lt (by linarith) },
{ exact IH _ (nat.div_lt_self (nat.succ_pos _) (by linarith)) hd }
end
/-- The digits in the base b expansion of n are all less than b, if b ≥ 2 -/
lemma digits_lt_base {b m d : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hd : d ∈ digits b m) : d < b :=
begin
rcases b with _ | _ | b; try {linarith},
exact digits_lt_base' hd,
end
/-- an n-digit number in base b + 2 is less than (b + 2)^n -/
lemma of_digits_lt_base_pow_length' {b : ℕ} {l : list ℕ} (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b+2) :
of_digits (b+2) l < (b+2)^(l.length) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl IH,
{ simp [of_digits], },
{ rw [of_digits, list.length_cons, pow_succ],
have : (of_digits (b + 2) tl + 1) * (b+2) ≤ (b + 2) ^ tl.length * (b+2) :=
mul_le_mul (IH (λ x hx, hl _ (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)))
(by refl) dec_trivial (nat.zero_le _),
suffices : ↑hd < b + 2,
{ linarith },
norm_cast,
exact hl hd (list.mem_cons_self _ _) }
end
/-- an n-digit number in base b is less than b^n if b ≥ 2 -/
lemma of_digits_lt_base_pow_length {b : ℕ} {l : list ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b) :
of_digits b l < b^l.length :=
begin
rcases b with _ | _ | b; try { linarith },
exact of_digits_lt_base_pow_length' hl,
end
/-- Any number m is less than (b+2)^(number of digits in the base b + 2 representation of m) -/
lemma lt_base_pow_length_digits' {b m : ℕ} : m < (b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length :=
begin
convert of_digits_lt_base_pow_length' (λ _, digits_lt_base'),
rw of_digits_digits (b+2) m,
end
/-- Any number m is less than b^(number of digits in the base b representation of m) -/
lemma lt_base_pow_length_digits {b m : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) : m < b^(digits b m).length :=
begin
rcases b with _ | _ | b; try { linarith },
exact lt_base_pow_length_digits',
end
lemma of_digits_digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} :
of_digits b (digits b n ++ digits b m) = n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m:=
by rw [of_digits_append, of_digits_digits, of_digits_digits]
lemma digits_len_le_digits_len_succ (b n : ℕ) : (digits b n).length ≤ (digits b (n + 1)).length :=
begin
cases b,
{ -- base 0
cases n; simp },
{ cases b,
{ -- base 1
simp },
{ -- base >= 2
apply nat.strong_induction_on n,
clear n,
intros n IH,
cases n,
{ simp },
{ rw [digits_add_two_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one],
by_cases hdvd : (b.succ.succ) ∣ (n.succ+1),
{ rw [nat.succ_div_of_dvd hdvd, list.length_cons, list.length_cons, nat.succ_le_succ_iff],
apply IH,
exact nat.div_lt_self (by linarith) (by linarith) },
{ rw nat.succ_div_of_not_dvd hdvd,
refl } } } }
end
lemma le_digits_len_le (b n m : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : (digits b n).length ≤ (digits b m).length :=
monotone_of_monotone_nat (digits_len_le_digits_len_succ b) h
lemma pow_length_le_mul_of_digits {b : ℕ} {l : list ℕ} (hl : l ≠ []) (hl2 : l.last hl ≠ 0):
(b + 2) ^ l.length ≤ (b + 2) * of_digits (b+2) l :=
begin
rw [←list.init_append_last hl],
simp only [list.length_append, list.length, zero_add, list.length_init, of_digits_append,
list.length_init, of_digits_singleton, add_comm (l.length - 1), pow_add, pow_one],
apply nat.mul_le_mul_left,
refine le_trans _ (nat.le_add_left _ _),
have : 0 < l.last hl, { rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero] },
convert nat.mul_le_mul_left _ this, rw [mul_one]
end
/--
Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
(b+2)^((number of digits in the base (b+2) representation of m) - 1)
-/
lemma base_pow_length_digits_le' (b m : ℕ) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ ((digits (b + 2) m).length) ≤ (b + 2) * m :=
begin
have : digits (b + 2) m ≠ [], from digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm,
convert pow_length_le_mul_of_digits this (last_digit_ne_zero _ hm),
rwa of_digits_digits,
end
/--
Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
b^((number of digits in the base b representation of m) - 1)
-/
lemma base_pow_length_digits_le (b m : ℕ) (hb : 2 ≤ b): m ≠ 0 → b ^ ((digits b m).length) ≤ b * m :=
begin
rcases b with _ | _ | b; try { linarith },
exact base_pow_length_digits_le' b m,
end
/-! ### Modular Arithmetic -/
-- This is really a theorem about polynomials.
lemma dvd_of_digits_sub_of_digits {α : Type*} [comm_ring α]
{a b k : α} (h : k ∣ a - b) (L : list ℕ) :
k ∣ of_digits a L - of_digits b L :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ change k ∣ 0 - 0, simp, },
{ simp only [of_digits, add_sub_add_left_eq_sub],
exact dvd_mul_sub_mul h ih, }
end
lemma of_digits_modeq' (b b' : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [MOD k]) (L : list ℕ) :
of_digits b L ≡ of_digits b' L [MOD k] :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ refl, },
{ dsimp [of_digits],
dsimp [nat.modeq] at *,
conv_lhs { rw [nat.add_mod, nat.mul_mod, h, ih], },
conv_rhs { rw [nat.add_mod, nat.mul_mod], }, }
end
lemma of_digits_modeq (b k : ℕ) (L : list ℕ) : of_digits b L ≡ of_digits (b % k) L [MOD k] :=
of_digits_modeq' b (b % k) k (nat.modeq.symm (nat.modeq.mod_modeq b k)) L
lemma of_digits_mod (b k : ℕ) (L : list ℕ) : of_digits b L % k = of_digits (b % k) L % k :=
of_digits_modeq b k L
lemma of_digits_zmodeq' (b b' : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [ZMOD k]) (L : list ℕ) :
of_digits b L ≡ of_digits b' L [ZMOD k] :=
begin
induction L with d L ih,
{ refl, },
{ dsimp [of_digits],
dsimp [int.modeq] at *,
conv_lhs { rw [int.add_mod, int.mul_mod, h, ih], },
conv_rhs { rw [int.add_mod, int.mul_mod], }, }
end
lemma of_digits_zmodeq (b : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (L : list ℕ) :
of_digits b L ≡ of_digits (b % k) L [ZMOD k] :=
of_digits_zmodeq' b (b % k) k (int.modeq.symm (int.modeq.mod_modeq b ↑k)) L
lemma of_digits_zmod (b : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (L : list ℕ) :
of_digits b L % k = of_digits (b % k) L % k :=
of_digits_zmodeq b k L
lemma modeq_digits_sum (b b' : ℕ) (h : b' % b = 1) (n : ℕ) :
n ≡ (digits b' n).sum [MOD b] :=
begin
rw ←of_digits_one,
conv { congr, skip, rw ←(of_digits_digits b' n) },
convert of_digits_modeq _ _ _,
exact h.symm,
end
lemma modeq_three_digits_sum (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits 10 n).sum [MOD 3] :=
modeq_digits_sum 3 10 (by norm_num) n
lemma modeq_nine_digits_sum (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits 10 n).sum [MOD 9] :=
modeq_digits_sum 9 10 (by norm_num) n
lemma zmodeq_of_digits_digits (b b' : ℕ) (c : ℤ) (h : b' ≡ c [ZMOD b]) (n : ℕ) :
n ≡ of_digits c (digits b' n) [ZMOD b] :=
begin
conv { congr, skip, rw ←(of_digits_digits b' n) },
rw coe_int_of_digits,
apply of_digits_zmodeq' _ _ _ h,
end
lemma of_digits_neg_one : Π (L : list ℕ),
of_digits (-1 : ℤ) L = (L.map (λ n : ℕ, (n : ℤ))).alternating_sum
| [] := rfl
| [n] := by simp [of_digits, list.alternating_sum]
| (a :: b :: t) :=
begin
simp only [of_digits, list.alternating_sum, list.map_cons, of_digits_neg_one t],
push_cast,
ring,
end
lemma modeq_eleven_digits_sum (n : ℕ) :
n ≡ ((digits 10 n).map (λ n : ℕ, (n : ℤ))).alternating_sum [ZMOD 11] :=
begin
have t := zmodeq_of_digits_digits 11 10 (-1 : ℤ) (by unfold int.modeq; norm_num) n,
rwa of_digits_neg_one at t
end
/-! ## Divisibility -/
lemma dvd_iff_dvd_digits_sum (b b' : ℕ) (h : b' % b = 1) (n : ℕ) :
b ∣ n ↔ b ∣ (digits b' n).sum :=
begin
rw ←of_digits_one,
conv_lhs { rw ←(of_digits_digits b' n) },
rw [nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, of_digits_mod, h],
end
/-- **Divisibility by 3 Rule** -/
lemma three_dvd_iff (n : ℕ) : 3 ∣ n ↔ 3 ∣ (digits 10 n).sum :=
dvd_iff_dvd_digits_sum 3 10 (by norm_num) n
lemma nine_dvd_iff (n : ℕ) : 9 ∣ n ↔ 9 ∣ (digits 10 n).sum :=
dvd_iff_dvd_digits_sum 9 10 (by norm_num) n
lemma dvd_iff_dvd_of_digits (b b' : ℕ) (c : ℤ) (h : (b : ℤ) ∣ (b' : ℤ) - c) (n : ℕ) :
b ∣ n ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ of_digits c (digits b' n) :=
begin
rw ←int.coe_nat_dvd,
exact dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub
(int.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd.1
(zmodeq_of_digits_digits b b' c (int.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd.2 h).symm _).symm),
end
lemma eleven_dvd_iff (n : ℕ) :
11 ∣ n ↔ (11 : ℤ) ∣ ((digits 10 n).map (λ n : ℕ, (n : ℤ))).alternating_sum :=
begin
have t := dvd_iff_dvd_of_digits 11 10 (-1 : ℤ) (by norm_num) n,
rw of_digits_neg_one at t,
exact t,
end
/-! ### `norm_digits` tactic -/
namespace norm_digits
theorem digits_succ
(b n m r l)
(e : r + b * m = n)
(hr : r < b)
(h : nat.digits b m = l ∧ 2 ≤ b ∧ 0 < m) :
nat.digits b n = r :: l ∧ 2 ≤ b ∧ 0 < n :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨h, b2, m0⟩,
have b0 : 0 < b := by linarith,
have n0 : 0 < n := by linarith [mul_pos b0 m0],
refine ⟨_, b2, n0⟩,
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := (nat.div_mod_unique b0).2 ⟨e, hr⟩,
subst h, exact nat.digits_def' b2 n0,
end
theorem digits_one
(b n) (n0 : 0 < n) (nb : n < b) :
nat.digits b n = [n] ∧ 2 ≤ b ∧ 0 < n :=
begin
have b2 : 2 ≤ b := by linarith,
refine ⟨_, b2, n0⟩,
rw [nat.digits_def' b2 n0, nat.mod_eq_of_lt nb,
(nat.div_eq_zero_iff (by linarith : 0 < b)).2 nb, nat.digits_zero],
end
open tactic
/-- Helper function for the `norm_digits` tactic. -/
meta def eval_aux (eb : expr) (b : ℕ) :
expr → ℕ → instance_cache → tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
| en n ic := do
let m := n / b,
let r := n % b,
(ic, er) ← ic.of_nat r,
(ic, pr) ← norm_num.prove_lt_nat ic er eb,
if m = 0 then do
(_, pn0) ← norm_num.prove_pos ic en,
return (ic, `([%%en] : list nat), `(digits_one %%eb %%en %%pn0 %%pr))
else do
em ← expr.of_nat `(ℕ) m,
(_, pe) ← norm_num.derive `(%%er + %%eb * %%em : ℕ),
(ic, el, p) ← eval_aux em m ic,
return (ic, `(@list.cons ℕ %%er %%el),
`(digits_succ %%eb %%en %%em %%er %%el %%pe %%pr %%p))
/--
A tactic for normalizing expressions of the form `nat.digits a b = l` where
`a` and `b` are numerals.
```
example : nat.digits 10 123 = [3,2,1] := by norm_num
```
-/
@[norm_num] meta def eval : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(nat.digits %%eb %%en) := do
b ← expr.to_nat eb,
n ← expr.to_nat en,
if n = 0 then return (`([] : list ℕ), `(nat.digits_zero %%eb))
else if b = 0 then do
ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
(_, pn0) ← norm_num.prove_pos ic en,
return (`([%%en] : list ℕ), `(@nat.digits_zero_succ' %%en %%pn0))
else if b = 1 then do
ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
(_, pn0) ← norm_num.prove_pos ic en,
s ← simp_lemmas.add_simp simp_lemmas.mk `list.repeat,
(rhs, p2, _) ← simplify s [] `(list.repeat 1 %%en),
p ← mk_eq_trans `(nat.digits_one %%en) p2,
return (rhs, p)
else do
ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
(_, l, p) ← eval_aux eb b en n ic,
p ← mk_app ``and.left [p],
return (l, p)
| _ := failed
end norm_digits
end nat
|
337f675b2460a9ba342b5627a14d84b27437acb5 | af58757c0ea0692dc50b847d50227363bf9b45bc | /src/fol.lean | d67e3e14d48931d5fcddba4c5ecfcb2ef8b7e8b5 | [] | no_license | alyata/fol_lean | b5ca6a8e0adbbe4362bb31ea2ad21d4b40f8fd0a | 5f2846e3e88d26712556697dd87b323fe7e6289f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,445,984,511 | 1,622,871,465,000 | 1,622,871,465,000 | 372,267,980 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,854 | lean | import utils.finvec
set_option pp.beta true
namespace fol
-- Syntax of First-Order Logic
structure language : Type 1 :=
(funcs : ℕ → Type) (preds : ℕ → Type)
-- First Order Terms
inductive term (L : language) : Type
| var : ℕ → term
| func : ∀ {n : ℕ} (name : L.funcs n) (args : fin.vec n term), term
-- First Order Formulas
inductive atom (L : language) : Type
| atom : ∀ {n : ℕ} (name : L.preds n) (args : fin.vec n (term L)), atom
inductive formula (L : language) : Type
| bottom : formula
| top : formula
| atom : atom L → formula
| eq : term L → term L → formula
| and : formula → formula → formula
| or : formula → formula → formula
| imply : formula → formula → formula
| not : formula → formula
| for_all : formula → formula
| exist : formula → formula
notation `⨯` := formula.bottom -- \cross
notation `✓` := formula.top -- \check
prefix `A_` : max := formula.atom
infixr `_=_`: 88 := formula.eq
infixr `_∧_`: 60 := formula.and
infixr `_∨_`: 61 := formula.or
infixr `_→_`: 62 := formula.imply
prefix `!_`: max := formula.not
prefix `∀_`: 110 := formula.for_all
prefix `∃_`: 110 := formula.exist
-- bounded representations of terms and formulas such that the type carries
-- a parameter n such that all *free* variables occuring in the term/formula
-- are less than n.
inductive bounded_term (L : language) : ℕ → Type
| var : ∀(i : ℕ), bounded_term (i + 1)
| func : ∀{n : ℕ} {f : fin n → ℕ} (name : L.funcs n)
(args : fin.dvec n (λi, bounded_term (f i))),
bounded_term (fin.max f)
def closed_term (L : language) : Type := bounded_term L 0
-- Given an unbounded term, return a bound value k and a term bounded by k
def term.to_bounded {L : language} : term L → Σ{k : ℕ}, bounded_term L k
| (term.var i) := ⟨i + 1, bounded_term.var i⟩
| (term.func name args) :=
let b_args := (λi, (args i).to_bounded)
in ⟨fin.max $ fin.unzip_left b_args, bounded_term.func name (fin.unzip_right b_args)⟩
inductive bounded_atom (L : language) : ℕ → Type
| atom : ∀{n : ℕ} {f : fin n → ℕ} (name : L.preds n)
(args : fin.dvec n (λi, bounded_term L (f i))),
bounded_atom (fin.max f)
def closed_atom (L : language) : Type := bounded_atom L 0
def atom.to_bounded {L : language} : atom L → Σ{k : ℕ}, bounded_atom L k
| (atom.atom name args) :=
let b_args := (λi, (args i).to_bounded)
in ⟨fin.max $ fin.unzip_left b_args, bounded_atom.atom name (fin.unzip_right b_args)⟩
inductive bounded_formula (L : language) : ℕ → Type
| bottom : bounded_formula 0
| top : bounded_formula 0
| atom : ∀{n}, bounded_atom L n → bounded_formula n
| eq : ∀{n m}, bounded_term L n → bounded_term L m → bounded_formula (max n m)
| and : ∀{n m}, bounded_formula n → bounded_formula m → bounded_formula (max n m)
| or : ∀{n m}, bounded_formula n → bounded_formula m → bounded_formula (max n m)
| imply : ∀{n m}, bounded_formula n → bounded_formula m → bounded_formula (max n m)
| not : ∀{n}, bounded_formula n → bounded_formula n
| for_all : ∀{n}, bounded_formula n → bounded_formula (n - 1)
| exist : ∀{n}, bounded_formula n → bounded_formula (n - 1)
notation `:⨯` := bounded_formula.bottom -- \cross
notation `:✓` := bounded_formula.top -- \check
prefix `:A_` : max := bounded_formula.atom
infixr `_:=_`: 88 := bounded_formula.eq
infixr `_:∧_`: 60 := bounded_formula.and
infixr `_:∨_`: 61 := bounded_formula.or
infixr `_:→_`: 62 := bounded_formula.imply
prefix `:!_`: max := bounded_formula.not
prefix `:∀_`: 110 := bounded_formula.for_all
prefix `:∃_`: 110 := bounded_formula.exist
def formula.to_bounded {L : language} : formula L → Σk : ℕ, bounded_formula L k
| ⨯ := ⟨0, :⨯⟩
| ✓ := ⟨0, :✓⟩
| (formula.atom p) := let bp := p.to_bounded in ⟨bp.fst, :A_ bp.snd⟩
| (t₁ _=_ t₂) := let bt₁ := t₁.to_bounded, bt₂ := t₂.to_bounded
in ⟨max bt₁.fst bt₂.fst, bt₁.snd _:=_ bt₂.snd⟩
| (f₁ _∧_ f₂) := let bf₁ := f₁.to_bounded, bf₂ := f₂.to_bounded
in ⟨max bf₁.fst bf₂.fst, bf₁.snd _:∧_ bf₂.snd⟩
| (f₁ _∨_ f₂) := let bf₁ := f₁.to_bounded, bf₂ := f₂.to_bounded
in ⟨max bf₁.fst bf₂.fst, bf₁.snd _:∨_ bf₂.snd⟩
| (f₁ _→_ f₂) := let bf₁ := f₁.to_bounded, bf₂ := f₂.to_bounded
in ⟨max bf₁.fst bf₂.fst, bf₁.snd _:→_ bf₂.snd⟩
| (!_ f) := let bf := f.to_bounded in ⟨bf.fst, :!_ bf.snd⟩
| (∀_ f) := let bf := f.to_bounded in ⟨bf.fst - 1, :∀_ bf.snd⟩
| (∃_ f) := let bf := f.to_bounded in ⟨bf.fst - 1, :∃_ bf.snd⟩
def sentence (L : language) : Type := bounded_formula L 0
-- Semantics of First-Order Logic
/- Given a language L, a model interprets:
* each function symbol (with arity n) in L as a mapping U^n → U
* each relation symbol (with arity n) in L as a proposition over n arguments from U
where U is the domain of the model -/
structure model (L : language) :=
(domain : Type)
(funcs : ∀ {n}, L.funcs n → (fin.vec n domain → domain))
(preds : ∀ {n}, L.preds n → (fin.vec n domain → Prop))
def term.valuation {L : language} (m : model L)
(var_assignment : ℕ → m.domain) : term L → m.domain
| (term.var n) := var_assignment n
| (term.func name args) := (m.funcs name) (λi, term.valuation (args i))
def atom.valuation {L : language} (m : model L)
(var_assignment : ℕ → m.domain) : atom L → Prop
| (atom.atom name args) := (m.preds name) (λi, (term.valuation m var_assignment) (args i))
def shift {L : language} {m : model L}
(var_assignment : ℕ → m.domain) (x : m.domain) : (ℕ → m.domain)
| 0 := x
| (n + 1) := var_assignment n
def formula.valuation {L : language} (m : model L) :
(ℕ → m.domain) → formula L → Prop
| vars ⨯ := false
| vars ✓ := true
| vars (formula.atom p) := atom.valuation m vars p
| vars (t₁ _=_ t₂) := (term.valuation m vars t₁) = (term.valuation m vars t₂)
| vars (f₁ _∧_ f₂) := (formula.valuation vars f₁) ∧ (formula.valuation vars f₂)
| vars (f₁ _∨_ f₂) := (formula.valuation vars f₁) ∧ (formula.valuation vars f₂)
| vars (f₁ _→_ f₂) := (formula.valuation vars f₁) → (formula.valuation vars f₂)
| vars (!_f) := ¬ (formula.valuation vars f)
| vars (∀_f) := ∀(x : m.domain), formula.valuation (shift vars x) f
| vars (∃_f) := ∃(x : m.domain), formula.valuation (shift vars x) f
end fol |
34df2b372af5c04a1c0d418fdbef06abf770776e | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/logic/encodable/lattice.lean | 64e4e6693454944dd0f2d4bae3d48ba18842fe71 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,935 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import data.finset.basic
import data.set.pairwise
import logic.encodable.basic
/-!
# Lattice operations on encodable types
Lemmas about lattice and set operations on encodable types
## Implementation Notes
This is a separate file, to avoid unnecessary imports in basic files.
Previously some of these results were in the `measure_theory` folder.
-/
open set
namespace encodable
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [encodable β]
lemma supr_decode₂ [complete_lattice α] (f : β → α) :
(⨆ (i : ℕ) (b ∈ decode₂ β i), f b) = (⨆ b, f b) :=
by { rw [supr_comm], simp [mem_decode₂] }
lemma Union_decode₂ (f : β → set α) : (⋃ (i : ℕ) (b ∈ decode₂ β i), f b) = (⋃ b, f b) :=
supr_decode₂ f
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma Union_decode₂_cases
{f : β → set α} {C : set α → Prop}
(H0 : C ∅) (H1 : ∀ b, C (f b)) {n} :
C (⋃ b ∈ decode₂ β n, f b) :=
match decode₂ β n with
| none := by { simp, apply H0 }
| (some b) := by { convert H1 b, simp [ext_iff] }
end
theorem Union_decode₂_disjoint_on {f : β → set α} (hd : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
pairwise (disjoint on λ i, ⋃ b ∈ decode₂ β i, f b) :=
begin
rintro i j ij x,
suffices : ∀ a, encode a = i → x ∈ f a → ∀ b, encode b = j → x ∉ f b, by simpa [decode₂_eq_some],
rintro a rfl ha b rfl hb,
exact hd a b (mt (congr_arg encode) ij) ⟨ha, hb⟩
end
end encodable
namespace finset
lemma nonempty_encodable {α} (t : finset α) : nonempty $ encodable {i // i ∈ t} :=
begin
classical, induction t using finset.induction with x t hx ih,
{ refine ⟨⟨λ _, 0, λ _, none, λ ⟨x,y⟩, y.rec _⟩⟩ },
{ cases ih with ih, exactI ⟨encodable.of_equiv _ (finset.subtype_insert_equiv_option hx)⟩ }
end
end finset
|
679f947d42e601e462b938dba52ef177779b708f | 5e42295de7f5bcdf224b94603a8ec29b17c2d367 | /blackboard.lean | 9895beb329114519b3521f41e8e50d6a9a20be38 | [] | no_license | pnmadelaine/lean_polya | 9369e0d87dce773f91383bb58ac6fde0a00a1a40 | 1c62b0b3fa71044b0225ce28030627d251b08ebc | refs/heads/master | 1,590,161,172,243 | 1,515,010,019,000 | 1,515,010,019,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,292 | lean | import .datatypes .normalizer3
namespace polya
meta inductive expr_form
| sum_f : sum_form → expr_form
| prod_f : prod_form → expr_form
| atom_f : expr → expr_form
section
open expr_form
meta def expr_form.order : expr_form → expr_form → ordering
| (sum_f s1) (sum_f s2) := has_ordering.cmp s1 s2
| (sum_f _) (prod_f _) := ordering.lt
| (prod_f _) (sum_f _) := ordering.gt
| (prod_f _) (prod_f _) := ordering.eq
| (atom_f e1) (atom_f e2) := has_ordering.cmp e1 e2
| (atom_f _) _ := ordering.lt
| _ (atom_f _) := ordering.gt
meta instance expr_form.has_ordering : has_ordering expr_form := ⟨expr_form.order⟩
meta def expr_form.format : expr_form → format
| (sum_f sf) := "sum:" ++ to_fmt sf
| (prod_f pf) := "prod:" ++ to_fmt pf
| (atom_f e) := "atom:" ++ to_fmt e
meta instance expr_form.has_to_format : has_to_format expr_form := ⟨expr_form.format⟩
end
meta structure blackboard : Type :=
(ineqs : hash_map (expr×expr) (λ p, ineq_info p.1 p.2))
(diseqs : hash_map (expr×expr) (λ p, diseq_info p.1 p.2))
(signs : hash_map expr sign_info)
(exprs : rb_set (expr × expr_form))
(contr : contrad)
(changed : bool := ff)
namespace blackboard
meta def expr_pair_hash : expr × expr → ℕ
| (e1, e2) := (e1.hash + e2.hash) / 2
meta def mk_empty : blackboard :=
{ineqs := mk_hash_map expr_pair_hash,
diseqs := mk_hash_map expr_pair_hash,
signs := (mk_hash_map expr.hash),--.insert `(1 : ℚ) $ some ⟨gen_comp.gt, sign_proof.adhoc _ _ (tactic.to_expr ``(zero_lt_one : (1 : ℚ) > 0))⟩,
exprs := mk_rb_set,--.insert (`(1 : ℚ), expr_form.atom_f `(1 : ℚ)),
contr := contrad.none}
section accessors
variables (lhs rhs : expr) (bb : blackboard)
meta def is_changed : bool :=
bb.changed
meta def get_ineqs : ineq_info lhs rhs :=
if h : lhs = rhs then by rw h; exact (ineq_info.equal $ eq_data.refl rhs)
else if expr.lt rhs lhs then bb.ineqs.find' (lhs, rhs) else (bb.ineqs.find' (rhs, lhs)).reverse
meta def get_diseqs : diseq_info lhs rhs :=
if expr.lt rhs lhs then bb.diseqs.find' (lhs, rhs) else (bb.diseqs.find' (rhs, lhs)).reverse
meta def get_sign_info : sign_info lhs :=
bb.signs.find' lhs
meta def get_sign_comp : option gen_comp :=
match get_sign_info lhs bb with
| none := none
| some sd := some sd.c
end
meta def has_sign_info : bool :=
match get_sign_info lhs bb with
| some _ := tt
| none := ff
end
meta def has_strict_sign_info : bool :=
match get_sign_info lhs bb with
| some ⟨gen_comp.lt, _⟩ := tt
| some ⟨gen_comp.gt, _⟩ := tt
| _ := ff
end
meta def has_weak_sign_info : bool :=
match get_sign_info lhs bb with
| some ⟨gen_comp.lt, _⟩ := tt
| some ⟨gen_comp.gt, _⟩ := tt
| some ⟨gen_comp.ge, _⟩ := tt
| some ⟨gen_comp.le, _⟩ := tt
| _ := ff
end
meta def get_expr_list : list expr :=
bb.exprs.keys.map prod.fst
meta def get_expr_expr_form_list : list (expr × expr_form) :=
bb.exprs.keys
/-meta def get_sorted_expr_list : list expr :=
bb.exprs.keys.qsort expr.lt-/
meta def contr_found : bool :=
match bb.contr with
| contrad.none := ff
| _ := tt
end
meta def get_contr (bb : blackboard) : contrad :=
bb.contr
private meta def trace_signs : list expr → tactic unit :=
monad.mapm' (λ e, tactic.trace ("expr", e) >> tactic.trace (get_sign_info e bb))
private meta def trace_ineqs : list expr → tactic unit
| [] := tactic.skip
| (h::t) := monad.mapm' (λ e, tactic.trace ("exprs", h, e) >> tactic.trace (get_ineqs h e bb)) t >> trace_ineqs t
meta def trace : tactic unit :=
trace_ineqs bb bb.get_expr_list >> trace_signs bb bb.get_expr_list
meta def trace_exprs : tactic unit :=
tactic.trace $ bb.get_expr_list
meta def trace_expr_pairs : tactic unit :=
tactic.trace $ bb.get_expr_expr_form_list
end accessors
section manipulators
meta def add_expr (e : expr) (ef : expr_form) (bb : blackboard) : blackboard :=
{bb with exprs := bb.exprs.insert (e, ef), changed := tt}
meta def add_two_exprs (e1 e2 : expr) (ef1 ef2 : expr_form) (bb : blackboard) : blackboard :=
{(bb.add_expr e1 ef1).add_expr e2 ef2 with changed := tt}
meta def insert_sign (e : expr) (si : sign_data e) (bb : blackboard) : blackboard :=
{bb with signs := bb.signs.insert e (some si), changed := tt}
meta def insert_diseq {lhs rhs} (dd : diseq_data lhs rhs) (bb : blackboard) : blackboard :=
let dsq := bb.get_diseqs lhs rhs in
{bb with diseqs := bb.diseqs.insert (lhs, rhs) (dsq.insert dd.c dd), changed := tt}
meta def insert_ineq_info {lhs rhs} (ii : ineq_info lhs rhs) (bb : blackboard) : blackboard :=
{bb with ineqs := bb.ineqs.insert (lhs, rhs) ii, changed := tt}
meta def set_changed (b : bool) (bb : blackboard) : blackboard :=
{bb with changed := b}
end manipulators
end blackboard
section tactic_state_extension
open monad
meta def polya_state := state blackboard
meta instance : monad polya_state := state.monad _
meta def skip : polya_state unit := return ()
end tactic_state_extension
section tactics
open state
meta def lift_op (f : blackboard → blackboard) : polya_state unit :=
λ bb, ((), f bb)
meta instance tac_coe : has_coe (blackboard → blackboard) (polya_state unit) :=
⟨lift_op⟩
meta def lift_acc {α} (f : blackboard → α) : polya_state α :=
λ bb, (f bb, bb)
meta instance tac_coe' (α) : has_coe (blackboard → α) (polya_state α) :=
⟨lift_acc⟩
meta def add_expr (e : expr) (ef : expr_form) : polya_state unit :=
blackboard.add_expr e ef
meta def get_diseqs (lhs rhs : expr) : polya_state (diseq_info lhs rhs) :=
blackboard.get_diseqs lhs rhs
meta def get_ineqs (lhs rhs : expr) : polya_state (ineq_info lhs rhs) :=
blackboard.get_ineqs lhs rhs
meta def get_sign_info (e : expr) : polya_state (sign_info e) :=
blackboard.get_sign_info e
meta def has_sign_info (e : expr) : polya_state bool :=
blackboard.has_sign_info e
meta def has_strict_sign_info (e : expr) : polya_state bool :=
blackboard.has_strict_sign_info e
meta def has_weak_sign_info (e : expr) : polya_state bool :=
blackboard.has_weak_sign_info e
meta def assert_contradiction (ctr : contrad) : polya_state unit :=
↑(λ bb : blackboard, if bb.contr_found then bb else {bb with contr := ctr})
meta def get_expr_list : polya_state (list expr) :=
blackboard.get_expr_list
meta def get_unsigned_exprs : polya_state (list expr) :=
get_expr_list >>= mfilter (λ e, bnot <$> has_weak_sign_info e)
meta def get_strict_signed_exprs : polya_state (list expr) :=
get_expr_list >>= mfilter has_strict_sign_info
meta def get_weak_signed_exprs : polya_state (list expr) :=
get_expr_list >>= mfilter has_weak_sign_info
meta def get_expr_expr_form_list : polya_state (list (expr × expr_form)) :=
blackboard.get_expr_expr_form_list
meta def contr_found : polya_state bool :=
blackboard.contr_found
meta def get_contr : polya_state contrad :=
blackboard.get_contr
meta def is_changed : polya_state bool :=
blackboard.is_changed
meta def set_changed (b : bool): polya_state unit :=
blackboard.set_changed b
meta def is_nondeg_slope (id : Σ lhs rhs, ineq_data lhs rhs) : bool :=
match id.2.2.inq.to_slope with
| slope.horiz := ff
| slope.some m := bnot (m = 0)
end
meta def get_ineq_list : polya_state (list Σ lhs rhs, ineq_data lhs rhs) :=
let extract_ineq_info : Π l r, polya_state (list Σ lhs rhs, ineq_data lhs rhs) :=
(λ l r, if expr.lt l r then return [] else do ii ← get_ineqs l r,
match ii with
| ineq_info.one_comp id := return $ [(⟨l, r, id⟩ : Σ _ _, _)].filter (λ i, (is_nondeg_slope i) = tt)
| ineq_info.two_comps id1 id2 := return $ [(⟨l, r, id1⟩ : Σ _ _, _), ⟨l, r, id2⟩].filter (λ i, (is_nondeg_slope i) = tt)
| _ := return []
end),
inner_fold : Π lhs, Π lst r, polya_state (list Σ lhs rhs, ineq_data lhs rhs) :=
λ (lhs : expr) lst (r : expr), do nl ← extract_ineq_info lhs r, return $ list.append lst nl
in do exprs ← get_expr_list,
monad.foldl (λ lst l, monad.foldl (inner_fold l) lst exprs) [] exprs
--extract_ineq_info ```(1) ```(2)
meta def get_eq_list : polya_state (list Σ lhs rhs, eq_data lhs rhs) :=
let extract_eq_info : Π l r, polya_state (option Σ lhs rhs, eq_data lhs rhs) :=
(λ l r, if expr.lt l r then return none else do ii ← get_ineqs l r,
match ii with
| ineq_info.equal ed := return $ some ⟨l, r, ed⟩
| _ := return none
end),
inner_fold : Π lhs, Π lst r, polya_state (list Σ lhs rhs, eq_data lhs rhs) :=
λ (lhs : expr) lst (r : expr), do nl ← extract_eq_info lhs r, match nl with
| some ed := return (ed::lst)
| none := return lst
end
in do exprs ← get_expr_list,
monad.foldl (λ lst l, monad.foldl (inner_fold l) lst exprs) [] exprs
meta def get_sign_list : polya_state (list Σ e, sign_data e) :=
do exprs ← get_expr_list,
monad.foldl (λ lst e, do {
si ← get_sign_info e,
match si with
| some sd := return (⟨e, sd⟩::lst)
| none := return lst
end
}) [] exprs
private meta def is_sum_form : expr × expr_form → option (expr × sum_form)
| ⟨e, (expr_form.sum_f s)⟩ := some (e, s)
| _ := none
private meta def is_prod_form : expr × expr_form → option (expr × prod_form)
| ⟨e, (expr_form.prod_f s)⟩ := some (e, s)
| _ := none
meta def get_add_defs : polya_state (list (expr × sum_form)) :=
do exprs ← get_expr_expr_form_list,
return $ reduce_option_list (exprs.map is_sum_form)
meta def get_mul_defs : polya_state (list (expr × prod_form)) :=
do exprs ← get_expr_expr_form_list,
return $ reduce_option_list (exprs.map is_prod_form)
meta def rat_one : expr := `(1 : ℚ)
meta def get_comps_with_one (e : expr) : polya_state (ineq_info e rat_one) :=
get_ineqs e rat_one
section
variables {lhs rhs : expr}
meta def first_eq_diseq_match (c : ℚ) : list (diseq_data lhs rhs) → option (diseq_data lhs rhs)
| [] := none
| (h::t) := if h.c = c then some h else first_eq_diseq_match t
meta def check_eq_diseq_contr_and_insert (ed : eq_data lhs rhs) : polya_state unit :=
do di ← get_diseqs lhs rhs,
match di.find ed.c with
| none := blackboard.insert_ineq_info $ ineq_info.equal ed
| some dd := assert_contradiction $ contrad.eq_diseq ed dd
end
meta def add_zero_ineqs_aux (add_ineq : Π l r, ineq_data l r → polya_state unit)
{e} (sd : sign_data e) : polya_state unit :=
match sd.c with
| gen_comp.eq := skip
| gen_comp.ne := skip
| c :=
let y : ℚ := if c.is_less then 1 else -1,
inq : ineq := ⟨c.is_strict, 0, y⟩ in
get_expr_list >>=
monad.mapm' (λ rhs, add_ineq e rhs ⟨inq, ineq_proof.zero_comp_of_sign_proof _ _ sd.prf⟩)
end
private meta def add_sign_aux (add_ineq : Π l r, ineq_data l r → polya_state unit)
{e} : sign_data e → polya_state unit | sd :=
do si ← get_sign_info e,
--return $ trace_val ("si:", si),
match si with
| none := ((λ bb, bb.insert_sign e sd) : polya_state unit) >> set_changed tt >> add_zero_ineqs_aux add_ineq sd
| some osd :=
if osd.c.implies sd.c then skip
else if sd.c.implies osd.c then ((λ bb, bb.insert_sign e sd) : polya_state unit) >> set_changed tt >> add_zero_ineqs_aux add_ineq sd
else if h : (sd.c = gen_comp.ge) ∧ (osd.c = gen_comp.le) then
add_sign_aux ⟨_, sign_proof.eq_of_le_of_ge (by rw ←h.right; exact osd.prf) (by rw ←h.left; exact sd.prf)⟩
else if h : (sd.c = gen_comp.le) ∧ (osd.c = gen_comp.ge) then
add_sign_aux ⟨_, sign_proof.eq_of_le_of_ge (by rw ←h.left; exact sd.prf) (by rw ←h.right; exact osd.prf)⟩
else if sd.c.contr osd.c then
let ctr := contrad.sign sd osd in
assert_contradiction (trace_val ("found contr in add_sign_aux", ctr)).2
else skip
end
/--
If id is nonstrict and a disequality is known, return the strict version of id.
Else, return id.
-/
meta def strengthen_ineq_if_implied (id : ineq_data lhs rhs) : polya_state (ineq_data lhs rhs) :=
if id.inq.strict then return id else
match id.inq.to_slope with
| slope.horiz :=
do si ← get_sign_info rhs,
match si with
| none := return id
| some sd := return $ id.strengthen_from_sign_rhs sd
end
| slope.some m :=
if m = 0 then do
si ← get_sign_info lhs,
match si with
| none := return id
| some sd := return $ id.strengthen_from_sign_lhs sd
end
else do
di ← get_diseqs lhs rhs,
match di.find m with
| none := return id
| some dd := return $ id.strengthen_from_diseq dd
end
end
/--
Assumes that nid.inq.to_slope = oid.inq.to_slope,
there are no equalities known yet between lhs and rhs,
and nid constitutes new and non-contradictory information.
It could be stronger than oid, or imply an equality.
TODO
-/
meta def add_ineq_one_comp_matching_slopes (nid oid : ineq_data lhs rhs) : polya_state unit :=
skip
/--
Assumes there are no equalities known between lhs and rhs,
and that the new ineq data constitutes new and non-contradictory information.
-/
meta def add_ineq_no_comps (id : ineq_data lhs rhs) : polya_state unit :=
do nid ← strengthen_ineq_if_implied id,
blackboard.insert_ineq_info $ ineq_info.one_comp nid
/--
Assumes there are no equalities known between lhs and rhs,
and that the new ineq data constitutes new and non-contradictory information.
-/
meta def add_ineq_one_comp (nid oid : ineq_data lhs rhs) : polya_state unit :=
if nid.inq.to_slope = oid.inq.to_slope then
add_ineq_one_comp_matching_slopes nid oid
--blackboard.insert_ineq_info $ ineq_info.one_comp nid
else do nid' ← strengthen_ineq_if_implied nid,
let nii := if nid'.inq.clockwise_of oid.inq
then ineq_info.two_comps oid nid'
else ineq_info.two_comps nid' oid in
blackboard.insert_ineq_info nii
/--
Assumes there are no equalities known between lhs and rhs,
and that the new ineq data constitutes new and non-contradictory information.
TODO : equal slopes cases are wrong!
-/
meta def add_ineq_two_comps (nid oid1 oid2 : ineq_data lhs rhs) : polya_state unit :=
if nid.inq.to_slope = oid1.inq.to_slope then
blackboard.insert_ineq_info $ ineq_info.two_comps nid oid2
else if nid.inq.to_slope = oid2.inq.to_slope then
blackboard.insert_ineq_info $ ineq_info.two_comps oid1 nid
else do nid' ← strengthen_ineq_if_implied nid,
let nii := if nid'.inq.clockwise_of oid1.inq && nid'.inq.clockwise_of oid2.inq
then ineq_info.mk_two_comps oid1 nid'
else if oid1.inq.clockwise_of nid'.inq && oid2.inq.clockwise_of nid'.inq
then ineq_info.mk_two_comps nid' oid2
else ineq_info.mk_two_comps oid1 oid2 in -- this last case shouldn't happen
blackboard.insert_ineq_info nii
private meta def add_implied_signs_from_eq_and_ineq_aux (as : Π {e}, sign_data e → polya_state unit) {lhs rhs}
(ed : eq_data lhs rhs) (id : ineq_data lhs rhs) : polya_state unit :=
do (si1, si2) ← return $ ed.get_implied_sign_info_from_ineq id,
match si1, si2 with
| some sd1, some sd2 := as sd1 >> as sd2
| some sd1, none := as sd1
| none, some sd2 := as sd2
| none, none := skip
end
/-
TODO: This is wrong, not always a contradiction. Could just be sign info
-/
meta def add_self_ineq (id : ineq_data lhs lhs) : polya_state unit :=
if id.inq.strict && bnot (id.inq.is_axis) then assert_contradiction $ contrad.strict_ineq_self id
else skip
open ineq_info
meta def add_ineq : Π {lhs rhs}, ineq_data lhs rhs → polya_state unit | lhs rhs id :=
--if (/-trace_val ("in add_ineq", id, lhs, rhs)).2.1.inq ≠ id.inq then skip else
if expr.lt lhs rhs then add_ineq id.reverse else
if h : lhs = rhs then @add_self_ineq lhs (by rw ←h at id; apply id) else
do ii ← get_ineqs lhs rhs,
if ( ("implies", ii, id, ii.implies id)).2.2.2 then skip
else if ii.implies_ineq id.inq.negate then assert_contradiction $ contrad.ineqs ii id
else match ii with
| no_comps := add_ineq_no_comps id
| one_comp id1 := add_ineq_one_comp id id1
| two_comps id1 id2 := add_ineq_two_comps id id1 id2
| equal ed := add_implied_signs_from_eq_and_ineq_aux (@add_sign_aux @add_ineq) ed id
end
meta def add_zero_ineq := @add_zero_ineqs_aux @add_ineq
meta def add_sign := @add_sign_aux @add_ineq
meta def add_implied_signs_from_eq_and_ineq := @add_implied_signs_from_eq_and_ineq_aux @add_sign
meta def check_ineq_for_diseq_update (id : ineq_data lhs rhs) (dd : diseq_data lhs rhs) :
polya_state unit :=
match id.inq.to_slope with
| slope.some c :=
if (c = dd.c) && bnot (id.inq.strict) then
let prf := ineq_proof.of_ineq_proof_and_diseq id.prf dd.prf in
add_ineq ⟨id.inq.strengthen, prf⟩
else skip
| _ := skip
end
meta def update_ineqs_and_insert_diseq (dd : diseq_data lhs rhs) : polya_state unit :=
do ei ← get_ineqs lhs rhs,
match ei with
| no_comps := blackboard.insert_diseq dd
| one_comp id1 := do check_ineq_for_diseq_update id1 dd, blackboard.insert_diseq dd
| two_comps id1 id2 :=
do check_ineq_for_diseq_update id1 dd, check_ineq_for_diseq_update id2 dd, blackboard.insert_diseq dd
| equal ed :=
if ed.c = dd.c then
assert_contradiction $ contrad.eq_diseq ed dd
else blackboard.insert_diseq dd
end
meta def add_eq : Π {lhs rhs}, eq_data lhs rhs → polya_state unit
| lhs rhs ed :=
if lhs.lt rhs then add_eq ed.reverse else
if h : ed.c = 0 then
let prf := sign_proof.eq_of_eq_zero (begin rw ←h, apply ed.prf end) in
add_sign ⟨_, prf⟩
else
do ei ← get_ineqs lhs rhs,
match ei with
| no_comps := check_eq_diseq_contr_and_insert ed
| one_comp id1 := add_implied_signs_from_eq_and_ineq ed id1 >>
check_eq_diseq_contr_and_insert ed
| two_comps id1 id2 := add_implied_signs_from_eq_and_ineq ed id1 >>
add_implied_signs_from_eq_and_ineq ed id2 >>
check_eq_diseq_contr_and_insert ed
| equal ⟨c, prf⟩ :=
if c = ed.c then skip
else
let sdl : sign_data lhs := ⟨gen_comp.eq, sign_proof.eq_of_two_eqs_lhs ed.prf prf⟩,
sdr : sign_data rhs := ⟨gen_comp.eq, sign_proof.eq_of_two_eqs_rhs ed.prf prf⟩
in add_sign sdl >> add_sign sdr
end
/-
TODO: check for lhs = rhs
-/
meta def add_diseq : Π {lhs rhs}, diseq_data lhs rhs → polya_state unit
| lhs rhs dd :=
if lhs.lt rhs then add_diseq dd.reverse else
if h : dd.c = 0 then
let prf := sign_proof.diseq_of_diseq_zero (begin rw ←h, apply dd.prf end) in
add_sign ⟨_, prf⟩
else
do di ← get_diseqs lhs rhs,
match di.find dd.c with
| none := update_ineqs_and_insert_diseq dd
| some _ := skip
end
end
meta def add_old_sign_info_to_new_ineq (new_e : expr) {old_e : expr} : sign_data old_e → polya_state unit
| ⟨gen_comp.ne, prf⟩ := skip
| ⟨gen_comp.eq, prf⟩ := skip
| ⟨c, prf⟩ :=
let y : ℚ := if c.is_less then 1 else -1,
inq : ineq := ⟨c.is_strict, 0, y⟩,
--inq' := if old_e.lt new_e then inq.reverse else inq in
ip := ineq_proof.zero_comp_of_sign_proof new_e inq prf in
add_ineq $ /-trace_val-/ ⟨_, ip⟩--⟨inq', ineq_proof.zero_comp_of_sign_proof new_e _ prf⟩
meta def add_expr_and_update_ineqs (e : expr) (ef : expr_form) : polya_state unit :=
do es ← get_expr_list,
if e ∈ es then skip else do
add_expr (/-trace_val-/ ("adding expr and updating:", e)).2 ef,
es.mmap' (λ e',
do si ← get_sign_info e',
match si with
| some sd := add_old_sign_info_to_new_ineq e (/-trace_val-/ ("adding old sign info to:", e, sd)).2.2
| none := skip
end)
/-meta def process_expr : expr → expr_form → polya_state unit :=
λ e ef, add_expr e ef >>
match e with
| `(%%lhs + %%rhs) := process_expr lhs >> process_expr rhs
| `(%%lhs * %%rhs) := process_expr lhs >> process_expr lhs
| _ := skip
end-/
--meta def mk_neg : expr → expr
/-meta def get_sum_components : expr → list expr
| `(%%lhs + %%rhs) := rhs::(get_sum_components lhs)
--| `(%%lhs - %%rhs) := mk_neg rhs::(get_sum_components lhs)
| a := [a]
meta def get_prod_components : expr → list expr
| `(%%lhs * %%rhs) := rhs::(get_prod_components lhs)
| a := [a]
meta def is_sum (e : expr) : bool :=
e.is_app_of ``has_add.add
meta def is_prod (e : expr) : bool :=
e.is_app_of ``has_mul.mul || e.is_app_of ``rat.pow
open tactic
meta def get_comps_of_mul (e : expr) : tactic (expr × ℚ) := match e with
| `(%%lhs * %%rhs) := (do c ← eval_expr ℚ lhs, return (rhs, c)) <|> return (e, 1)
| f := return (f, 1)
end
meta def get_comps_of_exp (e : expr) : tactic (expr × ℤ) := match e with
| `(rat.pow %%base %%exp) := (do z ← eval_expr ℤ exp, return (base, z)) <|> return (e, 1)
| f := return (f, 1)
end-/
meta def process_expr_tac : blackboard → expr → tactic blackboard | bb e :=
if is_sum e then
let scs := get_sum_components e in do
sum_components ← monad.mapm get_comps_of_mul scs,
let sf : sum_form := rb_map.of_list sum_components,
let (_, bb') := add_expr_and_update_ineqs e (expr_form.sum_f sf) bb,
monad.foldl process_expr_tac bb' (sum_components.map prod.fst)
else if is_prod e then
--trace "is_prod:" >> trace e >>
let scs := get_prod_components e in do
--trace ("scs", scs),
prod_components ← monad.mapm get_comps_of_exp scs,
let sf : prod_form := ⟨1, rb_map.of_list prod_components⟩,
let (_, bb') := add_expr_and_update_ineqs e (expr_form.prod_f sf) bb,
monad.foldl process_expr_tac bb' (prod_components.map prod.fst)--scs
else do /-trace "atom", trace e,-/ return $ prod.snd $ add_expr_and_update_ineqs e (expr_form.atom_f e) bb
meta def tac_add_eq {lhs rhs} (bb : blackboard) (ed : eq_data lhs rhs) : tactic blackboard :=
do bb' ← monad.foldl process_expr_tac bb [lhs, rhs],
return (add_eq ed bb').2
meta def tac_add_diseq {lhs rhs} (bb : blackboard) (ed : diseq_data lhs rhs) : tactic blackboard :=
do bb' ← monad.foldl process_expr_tac bb [lhs, rhs],
return (add_diseq ed bb').2
meta def tac_add_ineq {lhs rhs} (bb : blackboard) (ed : ineq_data lhs rhs) : tactic blackboard :=
do bb' ← monad.foldl process_expr_tac bb [lhs, rhs],
return (add_ineq ed bb').2
meta def tac_add_sign {e} (bb : blackboard) (sd : sign_data e) : tactic blackboard :=
do bb' ← process_expr_tac bb e,
return (add_sign sd bb').2
/-
/- assumes the second input is the type of prf
meta def process_comp (prf : expr) : expr → polya_state unit
| ```(%%lhs ≥ %%rhs) := process_expr lhs >> process_expr rhs >>
add_ineq ⟨ineq.of_comp_and_slope , ineq_proof.hyp lhs rhs _ prf⟩-/
| _ := skip-/
end tactics
end polya
|
7145bdec7a3bdac4a8bce505ea71a1269d893630 | 50b3917f95cf9fe84639812ea0461b38f8f0dbe1 | /Build_Maths/build_math_levels.lean | ec1e73893b91eca8ff86f7cd0e77423a2d84f0eb | [] | no_license | roro47/xena | 6389bcd7dcf395656a2c85cfc90a4366e9b825bb | 237910190de38d6ff43694ffe3a9b68f79363e6c | refs/heads/master | 1,598,570,061,948 | 1,570,052,567,000 | 1,570,052,567,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,686 | lean | namespace xena
inductive xnat
| zero : xnat
| succ : xnat → xnat
open xnat
definition add : xnat → xnat → xnat
| n zero := n
| n (succ p) := succ (add n p)
notation a + b := add a b
definition one := succ zero
definition two := succ one
definition three := succ two
definition four := succ three
example : one + one = two :=
begin
refl
end
example : two + two = four :=
begin
dunfold two,
dunfold add,
admit,
end
theorem add_assoc (a b c : xnat) : (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) :=
begin
induction c with n Hn,
unfold add,
unfold add,
rw [Hn],
end
theorem add_zero (n : xnat) : n + zero = n := by unfold add
theorem zero_add (n : xnat) : zero + n = n :=
begin
induction n with t Ht,
refl,
unfold add,
rw [Ht],
end
theorem zero_add_eq_add_zero (n : xnat) : zero + n = n + zero :=
begin
rewrite [zero_add,add_zero]
end
theorem one_add_eq_succ (n : xnat) : (succ zero) + n = succ n :=
begin
induction n with a Ha,
refl,
unfold add,
rw [Ha],
end
theorem add_one_eq_succ (n : xnat) : n + (succ zero) = succ n :=
begin
unfold add
end
theorem add_comm (a b : xnat) : a + b = b + a :=
begin
induction a with m Hm,
exact zero_add_eq_add_zero b,
unfold add,
rewrite ←one_add_eq_succ,
rewrite ←one_add_eq_succ (b+m),
rewrite add_assoc,
rewrite Hm
end
theorem eq_iff_succ_eq_succ (a b : xnat) : succ a = succ b ↔ a = b :=
begin
split,
exact succ.inj,
assume H : a = b,
rw [H]
end
theorem add_cancel_right (a b t : xnat) : a = b ↔ a+t = b+t :=
begin
split,
assume H : a=b,
induction t with n Hn,
unfold add,
exact H,
unfold add,
rw [Hn],
induction t with n Hn,
unfold add,
assume H : a=b,
exact H,
unfold add,
rwa [eq_iff_succ_eq_succ],
end
definition mul : xnat → xnat → xnat
| n zero := zero
| n (succ p) := (mul n p) + n
notation a * b := mul a b
theorem mul_zero (a : xnat) : a * zero = zero := rfl
theorem zero_mul (a : xnat) : zero * a = zero :=
begin
induction a with n Hn,
refl,
unfold mul,
rw Hn,
refl
end
theorem mul_one (a : xnat) : a * (succ zero) = a :=
begin
unfold mul,
exact zero_add a,
end
theorem one_mul (a : xnat) : (succ zero) * a = a :=
begin
induction a with n Hn,
refl,
unfold mul,
rewrite Hn,
exact add_one_eq_succ n
end
theorem right_distrib (a b c : xnat) : a * (b + c) = a* b + a * c :=
begin
induction c with n Hn,
unfold add,
unfold mul,
unfold add,
unfold add,
unfold mul,
rewrite Hn,
rewrite add_assoc
end
theorem left_distrib (a b c : xnat) : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
begin
induction c with n Hn,
unfold mul,
refl,
rw [←add_one_eq_succ,right_distrib,Hn,right_distrib,right_distrib],
rw [mul_one,mul_one,mul_one],
rw [add_assoc,←add_assoc (b*n),add_comm (b*n),←add_assoc,←add_assoc,←add_assoc],
end
theorem mul_assoc (a b c : xnat) : (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) :=
begin
induction c with n Hn,
unfold mul,
unfold mul,
rewrite right_distrib,
rewrite Hn,
end
theorem mul_comm (a b : xnat) : a * b = b * a :=
begin
induction b with n Hn,
rewrite zero_mul,
exact mul_zero a,
unfold mul,
rewrite Hn,
rewrite ←add_one_eq_succ,
rewrite left_distrib,
rewrite one_mul,
end
definition less_than : xnat → xnat → Prop
| n zero := false
| zero (succ p) := true
| (succ m) (succ p) := less_than m p
notation a < b := less_than a b
notation b > a := less_than a b
theorem add_succ_equals_succ (a b : xnat) : a + (succ b) = succ (a + b) :=
begin
rw [←add_one_eq_succ,←add_one_eq_succ (a+b)],
rw add_assoc,
end
theorem inequality_A1 (a b t : xnat) : a < b → a + t < b + t :=
begin
assume H : a < b,
induction t with n Hn,
unfold add,
exact H,
repeat {rw [add_succ_equals_succ]},
unfold less_than,
exact Hn
end
-- set_option pp.notation false
theorem not_less_than_zero (a : xnat) : ¬ (a < zero) :=
begin
assume H : a < zero,
cases a,
exact H,
exact H,
end
-- set_option pp.notation false
definition less_than_or_equal (a b : xnat) := a=b ∨ a<b
notation a ≤ b := less_than_or_equal a b
notation b ≤ a := a ≤ b
theorem zero_leq (a : xnat) : zero ≤ a :=
begin
cases a,
unfold less_than_or_equal,
left,
refl,
unfold less_than_or_equal,
right,
unfold less_than,
end
theorem zero_lt_succ (a : xnat) : zero < succ a := trivial
theorem not_succ_le_zero (a : xnat) : ¬ (succ a ≤ zero) :=
begin
assume H : succ a ≤ zero,
cases H with H1 H2,
exact xnat.no_confusion H1,
exact H2,
end
theorem lt_succ (a : xnat) : a < succ a :=
begin
induction a with n Hn,
unfold less_than,
unfold less_than,
exact Hn,
end
theorem succ_lt_succ_of_lt (a b : xnat) : a < b → succ a < succ b :=
begin
assume H : a < b,
unfold less_than,
exact H,
end
theorem le_of_succ_le_succ (a b : xnat) : succ a ≤ succ b → a ≤ b :=
begin
assume H : succ a ≤ succ b,
cases H with H1 H2,
left,
rwa [←eq_iff_succ_eq_succ],
right,
unfold less_than at H2,
assumption,
end
theorem lt_or_eq_or_gt' (a : xnat) : ∀ b, a < b ∨ a = b ∨ b < a :=
begin
induction a with n Hn,
intro b,
cases b,
right,left,
trivial,
left,
trivial,
intro b,
cases b with m,
cases n,
right,right,
trivial,
right,right,
trivial,
unfold less_than,
rw [eq_iff_succ_eq_succ],
exact Hn m,
end
theorem lt_or_eq_or_gt (a b : xnat) : a < b ∨ a = b ∨ b < a :=
begin
exact lt_or_eq_or_gt' a b,
end
theorem lt_irrefl (a : xnat) : ¬ (a < a) :=
begin
induction a with n Hn,
unfold less_than,
trivial,
unfold less_than,
assumption,
end
theorem ne_of_lt (a b : xnat) : a < b → ¬ (a=b) :=
begin
assume Hlt : a < b,
assume Heq : a = b,
rw Heq at Hlt,
exact lt_irrefl b Hlt,
end
theorem lt_antisymm' (b : xnat) : ∀ a, a < b → ¬ (b < a) :=
begin
induction b with n Hn,
intro a,
assume H : a < zero,
exfalso,
exact not_less_than_zero a H,
intro a,
cases a with m Hm,
intro,
exact not_less_than_zero (succ n),
unfold less_than,
exact Hn m,
end
theorem lt_antisymm (a b : xnat) : a < b → ¬ (b < a) :=
begin
exact lt_antisymm' b a
end
theorem inequality_A2' (a : xnat) : ∀ b c, a < b → b < c → a < c :=
begin
induction a with n Hn,
intros b c,
assume H1 : zero < b,
assume H2 : b < c,
induction c with m Hm,
exfalso,
exact not_less_than_zero b H2,
unfold less_than,
intros b c,
cases b with m,
unfold less_than,
intro H,
exfalso,
exact H,
cases c,
intro H1,
unfold less_than,
intro,assumption,
unfold less_than,
exact Hn m c,
end
theorem inequality_A2 (a b c : xnat) : a<b → b<c → a<c :=
begin
exact inequality_A2' a b c,
end
theorem inequality_A3 (a b : xnat) : (a<b ∨ a=b ∨ b < a)
∧ (a<b → ¬ (a=b))
∧ (a<b → ¬ (b<a))
∧ ((a=b)→ ¬ (b<a)) :=
begin
split,
exact lt_or_eq_or_gt a b,
split,
exact ne_of_lt a b,
split,
exact lt_antisymm a b,
intro H1,
intro H2,
exact ne_of_lt b a H2 (eq.symm H1),
end
theorem inequality_A4 (a b : xnat) : a>zero → b>zero → a*b > zero :=
begin
assume Ha : a > zero,
assume Hb : b > zero,
cases a with n,
exfalso,
exact Ha,
cases b with m,
exfalso,
exact Hb,
dunfold mul,
dunfold add,
dunfold less_than,
trivial,
end
theorem lt_succ_of_lt (a b : xnat) : a < b → a < succ b :=
begin
admit,
end
theorem le_iff_add (a b : xnat) : a < b ↔ ∃ t : xnat, b = a + succ t :=
begin
split,
assume H : a < b,
induction b with n Hn,
exfalso,
exact not_less_than_zero a H,
admit,admit
end
theorem lt_succ_iff_leq (a b : xnat) : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
split,
assume H : a < succ b,
induction b with n Hn,
cases a,
left,
refl,
exfalso,
unfold less_than at H,
cases a,
exact H,
exact H,
admit,
admit,
end
end xena
|
ddeb42fd89a4630bd74a152898f7fb33db187c6a | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/box_integral/partition/filter.lean | 72e36eae9ec1394f367bb29f080c147994ce6286 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 28,281 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.box_integral.partition.subbox_induction
import analysis.box_integral.partition.split
/-!
# Filters used in box-based integrals
First we define a structure `box_integral.integration_params`. This structure will be used as an
argument in the definition of `box_integral.integral` in order to use the same definition for a few
well-known definitions of integrals based on partitions of a rectangular box into subboxes (Riemann
integral, Henstock-Kurzweil integral, and McShane integral).
This structure holds three boolean values (see below), and encodes eight different sets of
parameters; only four of these values are used somewhere in `mathlib`. Three of them correspond to
the integration theories listed above, and one is a generalization of the one-dimensional
Henstock-Kurzweil integral such that the divergence theorem works without additional integrability
assumptions.
Finally, for each set of parameters `l : box_integral.integration_params` and a rectangular box
`I : box_integral.box ι`, we define several `filter`s that will be used either in the definition of
the corresponding integral, or in the proofs of its properties. We equip
`box_integral.integration_params` with a `bounded_order` structure such that larger
`integration_params` produce larger filters.
## Main definitions
### Integration parameters
The structure `box_integral.integration_params` has 3 boolean fields with the following meaning:
* `bRiemann`: the value `tt` means that the filter corresponds to a Riemann-style integral, i.e. in
the definition of integrability we require a constant upper estimate `r` on the size of boxes of a
tagged partition; the value `ff` means that the estimate may depend on the position of the tag.
* `bHenstock`: the value `tt` means that we require that each tag belongs to its own closed box; the
value `ff` means that we only require that tags belong to the ambient box.
* `bDistortion`: the value `tt` means that `r` can depend on the maximal ratio of sides of the same
box of a partition. Presence of this case make quite a few proofs harder but we can prove the
divergence theorem only for the filter
`box_integral.integration_params.GP = ⊥ = {bRiemann := ff, bHenstock := tt, bDistortion := tt}`.
### Well-known sets of parameters
Out of eight possible values of `box_integral.integration_params`, the following four are used in
the library.
* `box_integral.integration_params.Riemann` (`bRiemann = tt`, `bHenstock = tt`, `bDistortion = ff`):
this value corresponds to the Riemann integral; in the corresponding filter, we require that the
diameters of all boxes `J` of a tagged partition are bounded from above by a constant upper
estimate that may not depend on the geometry of `J`, and each tag belongs to the corresponding
closed box.
* `box_integral.integration_params.Henstock` (`bRiemann = ff`, `bHenstock = tt`,
`bDistortion = ff`): this value corresponds to the most natural generalization of
Henstock-Kurzweil integral to higher dimension; the only (but important!) difference between this
theory and Riemann integral is that instead of a constant upper estimate on the size of all boxes
of a partition, we require that the partition is *subordinate* to a possibly discontinuous
function `r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}`, i.e. each box `J` is included in a closed ball with
center `π.tag J` and radius `r J`.
* `box_integral.integration_params.McShane` (`bRiemann = ff`, `bHenstock = ff`, `bDistortion = ff`):
this value corresponds to the McShane integral; the only difference with the Henstock integral is
that we allow tags to be outside of their boxes; the tags still have to be in the ambient closed
box, and the partition still has to be subordinate to a function.
* `box_integral.integration_params.GP = ⊥` (`bRiemann = ff`, `bHenstock = tt`, `bDistortion = tt`):
this is the least integration theory in our list, i.e., all functions integrable in any other
theory is integrable in this one as well. This is a non-standard generalization of the
Henstock-Kurzweil integral to higher dimension. In dimension one, it generates the same filter as
`Henstock`. In higher dimension, this generalization defines an integration theory such that the
divergence of any Fréchet differentiable function `f` is integrable, and its integral is equal to
the sum of integrals of `f` over the faces of the box, taken with appropriate signs.
A function `f` is `GP`-integrable if for any `ε > 0` and `c : ℝ≥0` there exists
`r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}` such that for any tagged partition `π` subordinate to `r`, if each
tag belongs to the corresponding closed box and for each box `J ∈ π`, the maximal ratio of its
sides is less than or equal to `c`, then the integral sum of `f` over `π` is `ε`-close to the
integral.
### Filters and predicates on `tagged_prepartition I`
For each value of `integration_params` and a rectangular box `I`, we define a few filters on
`tagged_prepartition I`. First, we define a predicate
```
structure box_integral.integration_params.mem_base_set (l : box_integral.integration_params)
(I : box_integral.box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ))
(π : box_integral.tagged_prepartition I) : Prop :=
```
This predicate says that
* if `l.bHenstock`, then `π` is a Henstock prepartition, i.e. each tag belongs to the corresponding
closed box;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then the distortion of each box in `π` is less than or equal to `c`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then there exists a prepartition `π'` with distortion `≤ c` that covers
exactly `I \ π.Union`.
The last condition is always true for `c > 1`, see TODO section for more details.
Then we define a predicate `box_integral.integration_params.r_cond` on functions
`r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}`. If `l.bRiemann`, then this predicate requires `r` to be a constant
function, otherwise it imposes no restrictions on `r`. We introduce this definition to prove a few
dot-notation lemmas: e.g., `box_integral.integration_params.r_cond.min` says that the pointwise
minimum of two functions that satisfy this condition satisfies this condition as well.
Then we define four filters on `box_integral.tagged_prepartition I`.
* `box_integral.integration_params.to_filter_distortion`: an auxiliary filter that takes parameters
`(l : box_integral.integration_params) (I : box_integral.box ι) (c : ℝ≥0)` and returns the
filter generated by all sets `{π | mem_base_set l I c r π}`, where `r` is a function satisfying
the predicate `box_integral.integration_params.r_cond l`;
* `box_integral.integration_params.to_filter l I`: the supremum of `l.to_filter_distortion I c`
over all `c : ℝ≥0`;
* `box_integral.integration_params.to_filter_distortion_Union l I c π₀`, where `π₀` is a
prepartition of `I`: the infimum of `l.to_filter_distortion I c` and the principal filter
generated by `{π | π.Union = π₀.Union}`;
* `box_integral.integration_params.to_filter_Union l I π₀`: the supremum of
`l.to_filter_distortion_Union l I c π₀` over all `c : ℝ≥0`. This is the filter (in the case
`π₀ = ⊤` is the one-box partition of `I`) used in the definition of the integral of a function
over a box.
## Implementation details
* Later we define the integral of a function over a rectangular box as the limit (if it exists) of
the integral sums along `box_integral.integration_params.to_filter_Union l I ⊤`. While it is
possible to define the integral with a general filter on `box_integral.tagged_prepartition I` as a
parameter, many lemmas (e.g., Sacks-Henstock lemma and most results about integrability of
functions) require the filter to have a predictable structure. So, instead of adding assumptions
about the filter here and there, we define this auxiliary type that can encode all integration
theories we need in practice.
* While the definition of the integral only uses the filter
`box_integral.integration_params.to_filter_Union l I ⊤` and partitions of a box, some lemmas
(e.g., the Henstock-Sacks lemmas) are best formulated in terms of the predicate `mem_base_set` and
other filters defined above.
* We use `bool` instead of `Prop` for the fields of `integration_params` in order to have decidable
equality and inequalities.
## TODO
Currently, `box_integral.integration_params.mem_base_set` explicitly requires that there exists a
partition of the complement `I \ π.Union` with distortion `≤ c`. For `c > 1`, this condition is
always true but the proof of this fact requires more API about
`box_integral.prepartition.split_many`. We should formalize this fact, then either require `c > 1`
everywhere, or replace `≤ c` with `< c` so that we automatically get `c > 1` for a non-trivial
prepartition (and consider the special case `π = ⊥` separately if needed).
## Tags
integral, rectangular box, partition, filter
-/
open set function filter metric finset bool
open_locale classical topological_space filter nnreal
noncomputable theory
namespace box_integral
variables {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {I J : box ι} {c c₁ c₂ : ℝ≥0} {r r₁ r₂ : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)}
{π π₁ π₂ : tagged_prepartition I}
open tagged_prepartition
/-- An `integration_params` is a structure holding 3 boolean values used to define a filter to be
used in the definition of a box-integrable function.
* `bRiemann`: the value `tt` means that the filter corresponds to a Riemann-style integral, i.e. in
the definition of integrability we require a constant upper estimate `r` on the size of boxes of a
tagged partition; the value `ff` means that the estimate may depend on the position of the tag.
* `bHenstock`: the value `tt` means that we require that each tag belongs to its own closed box; the
value `ff` means that we only require that tags belong to the ambient box.
* `bDistortion`: the value `tt` means that `r` can depend on the maximal ratio of sides of the same
box of a partition. Presence of this case makes quite a few proofs harder but we can prove the
divergence theorem only for the filter
`box_integral.integration_params.GP = ⊥ = {bRiemann := ff, bHenstock := tt, bDistortion := tt}`.
-/
@[ext] structure integration_params : Type :=
(bRiemann bHenstock bDistortion : bool)
variables {l l₁ l₂ : integration_params}
namespace integration_params
/-- Auxiliary equivalence with a product type used to lift an order. -/
def equiv_prod : integration_params ≃ bool × boolᵒᵈ × boolᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ l, ⟨l.1, order_dual.to_dual l.2, order_dual.to_dual l.3⟩,
inv_fun := λ l, ⟨l.1, order_dual.of_dual l.2.1, order_dual.of_dual l.2.2⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨a, b, c⟩, rfl,
right_inv := λ ⟨a, b, c⟩, rfl }
instance : partial_order integration_params :=
partial_order.lift equiv_prod equiv_prod.injective
/-- Auxiliary `order_iso` with a product type used to lift a `bounded_order` structure. -/
def iso_prod : integration_params ≃o bool × boolᵒᵈ × boolᵒᵈ :=
⟨equiv_prod, λ ⟨x, y, z⟩, iff.rfl⟩
instance : bounded_order integration_params :=
iso_prod.symm.to_galois_insertion.lift_bounded_order
/-- The value
`box_integral.integration_params.GP = ⊥` (`bRiemann = ff`, `bHenstock = tt`, `bDistortion = tt`)
corresponds to a generalization of the Henstock integral such that the Divergence theorem holds true
without additional integrability assumptions, see the module docstring for details. -/
instance : inhabited integration_params := ⟨⊥⟩
instance : decidable_rel ((≤) : integration_params → integration_params → Prop) :=
λ _ _, and.decidable
instance : decidable_eq integration_params := λ x y, decidable_of_iff _ (ext_iff x y).symm
/-- The `box_integral.integration_params` corresponding to the Riemann integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the diameters of all boxes `J` of a tagged partition are
bounded from above by a constant upper estimate that may not depend on the geometry of `J`, and each
tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. -/
def Riemann : integration_params :=
{ bRiemann := tt,
bHenstock := tt,
bDistortion := ff }
/-- The `box_integral.integration_params` corresponding to the Henstock-Kurzweil integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r` and each tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. -/
def Henstock : integration_params := ⟨ff, tt, ff⟩
/-- The `box_integral.integration_params` corresponding to the McShane integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r`; the tags may be outside of the corresponding closed box
(but still inside the ambient closed box `I.Icc`). -/
def McShane : integration_params := ⟨ff, ff, ff⟩
/-- The `box_integral.integration_params` corresponding to the generalized Perron integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r` and each tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. We also
require an upper estimate on the distortion of all boxes of the partition. -/
def GP : integration_params := ⊥
lemma Henstock_le_Riemann : Henstock ≤ Riemann := dec_trivial
lemma Henstock_le_McShane : Henstock ≤ McShane := dec_trivial
lemma GP_le : GP ≤ l := bot_le
/-- The predicate corresponding to a base set of the filter defined by an
`integration_params`. It says that
* if `l.bHenstock`, then `π` is a Henstock prepartition, i.e. each tag belongs to the corresponding
closed box;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then the distortion of each box in `π` is less than or equal to `c`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then there exists a prepartition `π'` with distortion `≤ c` that covers
exactly `I \ π.Union`.
The last condition is automatically verified for partitions, and is used in the proof of the
Sacks-Henstock inequality to compare two prepartitions covering the same part of the box.
It is also automatically satisfied for any `c > 1`, see TODO section of the module docstring for
details. -/
@[protect_proj] structure mem_base_set (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (c : ℝ≥0)
(r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) (π : tagged_prepartition I) : Prop :=
(is_subordinate : π.is_subordinate r)
(is_Henstock : l.bHenstock → π.is_Henstock)
(distortion_le : l.bDistortion → π.distortion ≤ c)
(exists_compl : l.bDistortion → ∃ π' : prepartition I, π'.Union = I \ π.Union ∧ π'.distortion ≤ c)
/-- A predicate saying that in case `l.bRiemann = tt`, the function `r` is a constant. -/
def r_cond {ι : Type*} (l : integration_params) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) : Prop :=
l.bRiemann → ∀ x, r x = r 0
/-- A set `s : set (tagged_prepartition I)` belongs to `l.to_filter_distortion I c` if there exists
a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` (or a constant `r` if `l.bRiemann = tt`) such that `s` contains each
prepartition `π` such that `l.mem_base_set I c r π`. -/
def to_filter_distortion (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) :
filter (tagged_prepartition I) :=
⨅ (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) (hr : l.r_cond r), 𝓟 {π | l.mem_base_set I c r π}
/-- A set `s : set (tagged_prepartition I)` belongs to `l.to_filter I` if for any `c : ℝ≥0` there
exists a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` (or a constant `r` if `l.bRiemann = tt`) such that
`s` contains each prepartition `π` such that `l.mem_base_set I c r π`. -/
def to_filter (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) :
filter (tagged_prepartition I) :=
⨆ c : ℝ≥0, l.to_filter_distortion I c
/-- A set `s : set (tagged_prepartition I)` belongs to `l.to_filter_distortion_Union I c π₀` if
there exists a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` (or a constant `r` if `l.bRiemann = tt`) such that `s`
contains each prepartition `π` such that `l.mem_base_set I c r π` and `π.Union = π₀.Union`. -/
def to_filter_distortion_Union (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (c : ℝ≥0)
(π₀ : prepartition I) :=
l.to_filter_distortion I c ⊓ 𝓟 {π | π.Union = π₀.Union}
/-- A set `s : set (tagged_prepartition I)` belongs to `l.to_filter_Union I π₀` if for any `c : ℝ≥0`
there exists a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` (or a constant `r` if `l.bRiemann = tt`) such that `s`
contains each prepartition `π` such that `l.mem_base_set I c r π` and `π.Union = π₀.Union`. -/
def to_filter_Union (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (π₀ : prepartition I) :=
⨆ c : ℝ≥0, l.to_filter_distortion_Union I c π₀
lemma r_cond_of_bRiemann_eq_ff {ι} (l : integration_params) (hl : l.bRiemann = ff)
{r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)} :
l.r_cond r :=
by simp [r_cond, hl]
lemma to_filter_inf_Union_eq (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (π₀ : prepartition I) :
l.to_filter I ⊓ 𝓟 {π | π.Union = π₀.Union} = l.to_filter_Union I π₀ :=
(supr_inf_principal _ _).symm
lemma mem_base_set.mono' (I : box ι) (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) (hc : c₁ ≤ c₂) {π : tagged_prepartition I}
(hr : ∀ J ∈ π, r₁ (π.tag J) ≤ r₂ (π.tag J)) (hπ : l₁.mem_base_set I c₁ r₁ π) :
l₂.mem_base_set I c₂ r₂ π :=
⟨hπ.1.mono' hr, λ h₂, hπ.2 (le_iff_imp.1 h.2.1 h₂),
λ hD, (hπ.3 (le_iff_imp.1 h.2.2 hD)).trans hc,
λ hD, (hπ.4 (le_iff_imp.1 h.2.2 hD)).imp $ λ π hπ, ⟨hπ.1, hπ.2.trans hc⟩⟩
@[mono] lemma mem_base_set.mono (I : box ι) (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) (hc : c₁ ≤ c₂) {π : tagged_prepartition I}
(hr : ∀ x ∈ I.Icc, r₁ x ≤ r₂ x) (hπ : l₁.mem_base_set I c₁ r₁ π) :
l₂.mem_base_set I c₂ r₂ π :=
hπ.mono' I h hc $ λ J hJ, hr _ $ π.tag_mem_Icc J
lemma mem_base_set.exists_common_compl (h₁ : l.mem_base_set I c₁ r₁ π₁)
(h₂ : l.mem_base_set I c₂ r₂ π₂) (hU : π₁.Union = π₂.Union) :
∃ π : prepartition I, π.Union = I \ π₁.Union ∧
(l.bDistortion → π.distortion ≤ c₁) ∧ (l.bDistortion → π.distortion ≤ c₂) :=
begin
wlog hc : c₁ ≤ c₂ := le_total c₁ c₂ using [c₁ c₂ r₁ r₂ π₁ π₂, c₂ c₁ r₂ r₁ π₂ π₁] tactic.skip,
{ by_cases hD : (l.bDistortion : Prop),
{ rcases h₁.4 hD with ⟨π, hπU, hπc⟩,
exact ⟨π, hπU, λ _, hπc, λ _, hπc.trans hc⟩ },
{ exact ⟨π₁.to_prepartition.compl, π₁.to_prepartition.Union_compl,
λ h, (hD h).elim, λ h, (hD h).elim⟩ } },
{ intros h₁ h₂ hU,
simpa [hU, and_comm] using this h₂ h₁ hU.symm }
end
protected lemma mem_base_set.union_compl_to_subordinate (hπ₁ : l.mem_base_set I c r₁ π₁)
(hle : ∀ x ∈ I.Icc, r₂ x ≤ r₁ x) {π₂ : prepartition I}
(hU : π₂.Union = I \ π₁.Union) (hc : l.bDistortion → π₂.distortion ≤ c) :
l.mem_base_set I c r₁ (π₁.union_compl_to_subordinate π₂ hU r₂) :=
⟨hπ₁.1.disj_union ((π₂.is_subordinate_to_subordinate r₂).mono hle) _,
λ h, ((hπ₁.2 h).disj_union (π₂.is_Henstock_to_subordinate _) _),
λ h, (distortion_union_compl_to_subordinate _ _ _ _).trans_le (max_le (hπ₁.3 h) (hc h)),
λ _, ⟨⊥, by simp⟩⟩
protected lemma mem_base_set.filter (hπ : l.mem_base_set I c r π) (p : box ι → Prop) :
l.mem_base_set I c r (π.filter p) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ J hJ, hπ.1 J (π.mem_filter.1 hJ).1, λ hH J hJ, hπ.2 hH J (π.mem_filter.1 hJ).1,
λ hD, (distortion_filter_le _ _).trans (hπ.3 hD), λ hD, _⟩,
rcases hπ.4 hD with ⟨π₁, hπ₁U, hc⟩,
set π₂ := π.filter (λ J, ¬p J),
have : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union,
by simpa [π₂, hπ₁U] using disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_right sdiff_le,
refine ⟨π₁.disj_union π₂.to_prepartition this, _, _⟩,
{ suffices : ↑I \ π.Union ∪ π.Union \ (π.filter p).Union = ↑I \ (π.filter p).Union, by simpa *,
have : (π.filter p).Union ⊆ π.Union, from bUnion_subset_bUnion_left (finset.filter_subset _ _),
ext x, fsplit,
{ rintro (⟨hxI, hxπ⟩|⟨hxπ, hxp⟩),
exacts [⟨hxI, mt (@this x) hxπ⟩, ⟨π.Union_subset hxπ, hxp⟩] },
{ rintro ⟨hxI, hxp⟩, by_cases hxπ : x ∈ π.Union,
exacts [or.inr ⟨hxπ, hxp⟩, or.inl ⟨hxI, hxπ⟩] } },
{ have : (π.filter (λ J, ¬p J)).distortion ≤ c, from (distortion_filter_le _ _).trans (hπ.3 hD),
simpa [hc] }
end
lemma bUnion_tagged_mem_base_set {π : prepartition I} {πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J}
(h : ∀ J ∈ π, l.mem_base_set J c r (πi J)) (hp : ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).is_partition)
(hc : l.bDistortion → π.compl.distortion ≤ c) :
l.mem_base_set I c r (π.bUnion_tagged πi) :=
begin
refine ⟨tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate_bUnion_tagged.2 $ λ J hJ, (h J hJ).1,
λ hH, tagged_prepartition.is_Henstock_bUnion_tagged.2 $ λ J hJ, (h J hJ).2 hH,
λ hD, _, λ hD, _⟩,
{ rw [prepartition.distortion_bUnion_tagged, finset.sup_le_iff],
exact λ J hJ, (h J hJ).3 hD },
{ refine ⟨_, _, hc hD⟩,
rw [π.Union_compl, ← π.Union_bUnion_partition hp], refl }
end
@[mono] lemma r_cond.mono {ι : Type*} {r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)} (h : l₁ ≤ l₂)
(hr : l₂.r_cond r) : l₁.r_cond r :=
λ hR, hr (le_iff_imp.1 h.1 hR)
lemma r_cond.min {ι : Type*} {r₁ r₂ : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)} (h₁ : l.r_cond r₁) (h₂ : l.r_cond r₂) :
l.r_cond (λ x, min (r₁ x) (r₂ x)) :=
λ hR x, congr_arg2 min (h₁ hR x) (h₂ hR x)
@[mono] lemma to_filter_distortion_mono (I : box ι) (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) (hc : c₁ ≤ c₂) :
l₁.to_filter_distortion I c₁ ≤ l₂.to_filter_distortion I c₂ :=
infi_mono $ λ r, infi_mono' $ λ hr,
⟨hr.mono h, principal_mono.2 $ λ _, mem_base_set.mono I h hc (λ _ _, le_rfl)⟩
@[mono] lemma to_filter_mono (I : box ι) {l₁ l₂ : integration_params} (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) :
l₁.to_filter I ≤ l₂.to_filter I :=
supr_mono $ λ c, to_filter_distortion_mono I h le_rfl
@[mono] lemma to_filter_Union_mono (I : box ι) {l₁ l₂ : integration_params} (h : l₁ ≤ l₂)
(π₀ : prepartition I) :
l₁.to_filter_Union I π₀ ≤ l₂.to_filter_Union I π₀ :=
supr_mono $ λ c, inf_le_inf_right _ $ to_filter_distortion_mono _ h le_rfl
lemma to_filter_Union_congr (I : box ι) (l : integration_params) {π₁ π₂ : prepartition I}
(h : π₁.Union = π₂.Union) : l.to_filter_Union I π₁ = l.to_filter_Union I π₂ :=
by simp only [to_filter_Union, to_filter_distortion_Union, h]
lemma has_basis_to_filter_distortion (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) :
(l.to_filter_distortion I c).has_basis l.r_cond (λ r, {π | l.mem_base_set I c r π}) :=
has_basis_binfi_principal'
(λ r₁ hr₁ r₂ hr₂, ⟨_, hr₁.min hr₂,
λ _, mem_base_set.mono _ le_rfl le_rfl (λ x hx, min_le_left _ _),
λ _, mem_base_set.mono _ le_rfl le_rfl (λ x hx, min_le_right _ _)⟩)
⟨λ _, ⟨1, zero_lt_one⟩, λ _ _, rfl⟩
lemma has_basis_to_filter_distortion_Union (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (c : ℝ≥0)
(π₀ : prepartition I) :
(l.to_filter_distortion_Union I c π₀).has_basis l.r_cond
(λ r, {π | l.mem_base_set I c r π ∧ π.Union = π₀.Union}) :=
(l.has_basis_to_filter_distortion I c).inf_principal _
lemma has_basis_to_filter_Union (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (π₀ : prepartition I) :
(l.to_filter_Union I π₀).has_basis (λ r : ℝ≥0 → (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ), ∀ c, l.r_cond (r c))
(λ r, {π | ∃ c, l.mem_base_set I c (r c) π ∧ π.Union = π₀.Union}) :=
have _ := λ c, l.has_basis_to_filter_distortion_Union I c π₀,
by simpa only [set_of_and, set_of_exists] using has_basis_supr this
lemma has_basis_to_filter_Union_top (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) :
(l.to_filter_Union I ⊤).has_basis (λ r : ℝ≥0 → (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ), ∀ c, l.r_cond (r c))
(λ r, {π | ∃ c, l.mem_base_set I c (r c) π ∧ π.is_partition}) :=
by simpa only [tagged_prepartition.is_partition_iff_Union_eq, prepartition.Union_top]
using l.has_basis_to_filter_Union I ⊤
lemma has_basis_to_filter (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) :
(l.to_filter I).has_basis (λ r : ℝ≥0 → (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ), ∀ c, l.r_cond (r c))
(λ r, {π | ∃ c, l.mem_base_set I c (r c) π}) :=
by simpa only [set_of_exists] using has_basis_supr (l.has_basis_to_filter_distortion I)
lemma tendsto_embed_box_to_filter_Union_top (l : integration_params) (h : I ≤ J) :
tendsto (tagged_prepartition.embed_box I J h) (l.to_filter_Union I ⊤)
(l.to_filter_Union J (prepartition.single J I h)) :=
begin
simp only [to_filter_Union, tendsto_supr], intro c,
set π₀ := (prepartition.single J I h),
refine le_supr_of_le (max c π₀.compl.distortion) _,
refine ((l.has_basis_to_filter_distortion_Union I c ⊤).tendsto_iff
(l.has_basis_to_filter_distortion_Union J _ _)).2 (λ r hr, _),
refine ⟨r, hr, λ π hπ, _⟩,
rw [mem_set_of_eq, prepartition.Union_top] at hπ,
refine ⟨⟨hπ.1.1, hπ.1.2, λ hD, le_trans (hπ.1.3 hD) (le_max_left _ _), λ hD, _⟩, _⟩,
{ refine ⟨_, π₀.Union_compl.trans _, le_max_right _ _⟩, congr' 1,
exact (prepartition.Union_single h).trans hπ.2.symm },
{ exact hπ.2.trans (prepartition.Union_single _).symm }
end
lemma exists_mem_base_set_le_Union_eq (l : integration_params) (π₀ : prepartition I)
(hc₁ : π₀.distortion ≤ c) (hc₂ : π₀.compl.distortion ≤ c) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) :
∃ π, l.mem_base_set I c r π ∧ π.to_prepartition ≤ π₀ ∧ π.Union = π₀.Union :=
begin
rcases π₀.exists_tagged_le_is_Henstock_is_subordinate_Union_eq r
with ⟨π, hle, hH, hr, hd, hU⟩,
refine ⟨π, ⟨hr, λ _, hH, λ _, hd.trans_le hc₁, λ hD, ⟨π₀.compl, _, hc₂⟩⟩, ⟨hle, hU⟩⟩,
exact prepartition.compl_congr hU ▸ π.to_prepartition.Union_compl
end
lemma exists_mem_base_set_is_partition (l : integration_params) (I : box ι)
(hc : I.distortion ≤ c) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) :
∃ π, l.mem_base_set I c r π ∧ π.is_partition :=
begin
rw ← prepartition.distortion_top at hc,
have hc' : (⊤ : prepartition I).compl.distortion ≤ c, by simp,
simpa [is_partition_iff_Union_eq] using l.exists_mem_base_set_le_Union_eq ⊤ hc hc' r
end
lemma to_filter_distortion_Union_ne_bot (l : integration_params) (I : box ι)
(π₀ : prepartition I) (hc₁ : π₀.distortion ≤ c) (hc₂ : π₀.compl.distortion ≤ c) :
(l.to_filter_distortion_Union I c π₀).ne_bot :=
((l.has_basis_to_filter_distortion I _).inf_principal _).ne_bot_iff.2 $ λ r hr,
(l.exists_mem_base_set_le_Union_eq π₀ hc₁ hc₂ r).imp $ λ π hπ, ⟨hπ.1, hπ.2.2⟩
instance to_filter_distortion_Union_ne_bot' (l : integration_params) (I : box ι)
(π₀ : prepartition I) :
(l.to_filter_distortion_Union I (max π₀.distortion π₀.compl.distortion) π₀).ne_bot :=
l.to_filter_distortion_Union_ne_bot I π₀ (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)
instance to_filter_distortion_ne_bot (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) :
(l.to_filter_distortion I I.distortion).ne_bot :=
by simpa using (l.to_filter_distortion_Union_ne_bot' I ⊤).mono inf_le_left
instance to_filter_ne_bot (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) : (l.to_filter I).ne_bot :=
(l.to_filter_distortion_ne_bot I).mono $ le_supr _ _
instance to_filter_Union_ne_bot (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) (π₀ : prepartition I) :
(l.to_filter_Union I π₀).ne_bot :=
(l.to_filter_distortion_Union_ne_bot' I π₀).mono $
le_supr (λ c, l.to_filter_distortion_Union I c π₀) _
lemma eventually_is_partition (l : integration_params) (I : box ι) :
∀ᶠ π in l.to_filter_Union I ⊤, tagged_prepartition.is_partition π :=
eventually_supr.2 $ λ c, eventually_inf_principal.2 $ eventually_of_forall $
λ π h, π.is_partition_iff_Union_eq.2 (h.trans prepartition.Union_top)
end integration_params
end box_integral
|
7687a2243cb81acf947be33dcb6b47e4f1d0e3b4 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/parent_struct_inst.lean | edba6a59cb3a62bfb976e665de774ad5ddc73184 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 150 | lean | open nat
structure A [class] := (n : ℕ)
definition f [A] := A.n
structure B extends A :=
(Hf : f = 0)
example : B := ⦃B, n := 0, Hf := rfl⦄
|
f8ed3e74c1136e91a40b00f422dafe75bd22e12f | 42c01158c2730cc6ac3e058c1339c18cb90366e2 | /M1F/2017-18/Example_Sheet_01/Question_07/M1F_sheet01_question07.lean | 8c10bb262b253661dd3d63ca7d7d14d608153c97 | [] | no_license | ChrisHughes24/xena | c80d94355d0c2ae8deddda9d01e6d31bc21c30ae | 337a0d7c9f0e255e08d6d0a383e303c080c6ec0c | refs/heads/master | 1,631,059,898,392 | 1,511,200,551,000 | 1,511,200,551,000 | 111,468,589 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 633 | lean | #exit -- remove this to make the code run
import analysis.real
-- real numbers live in here in Lean 3.3.0 mathlib
-- NB you need mathlib installed to get this working.
-- of_rat is the injection from the rationals to the reals.
def A : set ℝ := { x | x^2 < 3}
def B : set ℝ := {x | (∃ y : ℤ, x = of_rat y) ∧ x^2 < 3}
def C : set ℝ := {x | x^3 < 3}
theorem part_a : of_rat (1/2) ∈ A ∩ B := sorry
theorem part_b : of_rat (1/2) ∈ A ∪ B := sorry
theorem part_c : A ⊆ C := sorry
theorem part_d : B ⊆ C := sorry
theorem part_e : C ⊆ A ∪ B := sorry
theorem part_f : (A ∩ B) ∪ C = (A ∪ B) ∩ C := sorry
|
0049d1602cbb7d751834b4e31c8b78b44bc3be72 | aa2345b30d710f7e75f13157a35845ee6d48c017 | /linear_algebra/tensor_product.lean | 7492c0785c1c0e8725e4cfd2d5ffdee8305b7c99 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | CohenCyril/mathlib | 5241b20a3fd0ac0133e48e618a5fb7761ca7dcbe | a12d5a192f5923016752f638d19fc1a51610f163 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,031,957,957 | 1,541,432,824,000 | 1,541,432,824,000 | 156,246,337 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,541,434,514,000 | 1,541,434,513,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,600 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro
Tensor product of modules over commutative rings.
-/
import group_theory.free_abelian_group
import linear_algebra.basic tactic.squeeze
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*} {Q : Type*}
variables [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group N] [add_comm_group P] [add_comm_group Q]
variables [module R M] [module R N] [module R P] [module R Q]
include R
set_option class.instance_max_depth 100
namespace linear_map
def mk₂ (f : M → N → P)
(H1 : ∀ m₁ m₂ n, f (m₁ + m₂) n = f m₁ n + f m₂ n)
(H2 : ∀ c m n, f (c • m) n = c • f m n)
(H3 : ∀ m n₁ n₂, f m (n₁ + n₂) = f m n₁ + f m n₂)
(H4 : ∀ c m n, f m (c • n) = c • f m n) : M →ₗ N →ₗ P :=
⟨λ m, ⟨f m, H3 m, λ c, H4 c m⟩,
λ m₁ m₂, linear_map.ext $ H1 m₁ m₂,
λ c m, linear_map.ext $ H2 c m⟩
@[simp] theorem mk₂_apply
(f : M → N → P) {H1 H2 H3 H4} (m : M) (n : N) :
(mk₂ f H1 H2 H3 H4 : M →ₗ N →ₗ P) m n = f m n := rfl
variables (f : M →ₗ N →ₗ P)
theorem ext₂ {f g : M →ₗ N →ₗ P}
(H : ∀ m n, f m n = g m n) : f = g :=
linear_map.ext (λ m, linear_map.ext $ λ n, H m n)
def flip : N →ₗ M →ₗ P :=
mk₂ (λ n m, f m n)
(λ n₁ n₂ m, (f m).map_add _ _)
(λ c n m, (f m).map_smul _ _)
(λ n m₁ m₂, by rw f.map_add; refl)
(λ c n m, by rw f.map_smul; refl)
@[simp] theorem flip_apply (m : M) (n : N) : flip f n m = f m n := rfl
theorem flip_inj {f g : M →ₗ N →ₗ P} (H : flip f = flip g) : f = g :=
ext₂ $ λ m n, show flip f n m = flip g n m, by rw H
variables (R M N P)
def lflip : (M →ₗ N →ₗ P) →ₗ N →ₗ M →ₗ P :=
⟨flip, λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
variables {R M N P}
@[simp] theorem lflip_apply (m : M) (n : N) : lflip R M N P f n m = f m n := rfl
theorem map_zero₂ (y) : f 0 y = 0 := (flip f y).map_zero
theorem map_neg₂ (x y) : f (-x) y = -f x y := (flip f y).map_neg _
theorem map_add₂ (x₁ x₂ y) : f (x₁ + x₂) y = f x₁ y + f x₂ y := (flip f y).map_add _ _
theorem map_smul₂ (r x y) : f (r • x) y = r • f x y := (flip f y).map_smul _ _
variables (P)
def lcomp (f : M →ₗ N) : (N →ₗ P) →ₗ M →ₗ P :=
flip $ (flip id).comp f
variables {P}
@[simp] theorem lcomp_apply (f : M →ₗ N) (g : N →ₗ P) (x : M) :
lcomp P f g x = g (f x) := rfl
variables (M N P)
def llcomp : (N →ₗ P) →ₗ (M →ₗ N) →ₗ M →ₗ P :=
flip ⟨lcomp P,
λ f f', ext₂ $ λ g x, g.map_add _ _,
λ c f, ext₂ $ λ g x, g.map_smul _ _⟩
variables {M N P}
section
@[simp] theorem llcomp_apply (f : N →ₗ P) (g : M →ₗ N) (x : M) :
llcomp M N P f g x = f (g x) := rfl
end
def compl₂ (g : Q →ₗ N) : M →ₗ Q →ₗ P := (lcomp _ g).comp f
@[simp] theorem compl₂_apply (g : Q →ₗ N) (m : M) (q : Q) :
f.compl₂ g m q = f m (g q) := rfl
def compr₂ (g : P →ₗ Q) : M →ₗ N →ₗ Q :=
linear_map.comp (llcomp N P Q g) f
@[simp] theorem compr₂_apply (g : P →ₗ Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
f.compr₂ g m n = g (f m n) := rfl
variables (R M)
def lsmul : R →ₗ M →ₗ M :=
mk₂ (•) add_smul (λ _ _ _, eq.symm $ smul_smul _ _ _) smul_add
(λ r s m, by simp only [smul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm])
variables {R M}
@[simp] theorem lsmul_apply (r : R) (m : M) : lsmul R M r m = r • m := rfl
end linear_map
variables (M N)
namespace tensor_product
def relators : set (free_abelian_group (M × N)) :=
add_group.closure { x : free_abelian_group (M × N) |
(∃ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N), x = (m₁, n) + (m₂, n) - (m₁ + m₂, n)) ∨
(∃ (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), x = (m, n₁) + (m, n₂) - (m, n₁ + n₂)) ∨
(∃ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), x = (r • m, n) - (m, r • n)) }
namespace relators
instance : normal_add_subgroup (relators M N) :=
by unfold relators; apply normal_add_subgroup_of_add_comm_group
end relators
end tensor_product
def tensor_product : Type* :=
quotient_add_group.quotient (tensor_product.relators M N)
local infix ` ⊗ `:100 := tensor_product
namespace tensor_product
section module
local attribute [instance] quotient_add_group.left_rel normal_add_subgroup.to_is_add_subgroup
instance : add_comm_group (M ⊗ N) := quotient_add_group.add_comm_group _
instance quotient.mk.is_add_group_hom :
is_add_group_hom (quotient.mk : free_abelian_group (M × N) → M ⊗ N) :=
quotient_add_group.is_add_group_hom _
variables {M N}
def tmul (m : M) (n : N) : M ⊗ N := quotient_add_group.mk $ free_abelian_group.of (m, n)
infix ` ⊗ₜ `:100 := tmul
lemma add_tmul (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : (m₁ + m₂) ⊗ₜ n = m₁ ⊗ₜ n + m₂ ⊗ₜ n :=
eq.symm $ sub_eq_zero.1 $ eq.symm $ quotient.sound $
group.in_closure.basic $ or.inl $ ⟨m₁, m₂, n, rfl⟩
lemma tmul_add (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N) : m ⊗ₜ (n₁ + n₂) = m ⊗ₜ n₁ + m ⊗ₜ n₂ :=
eq.symm $ sub_eq_zero.1 $ eq.symm $ quotient.sound $
group.in_closure.basic $ or.inr $ or.inl $ ⟨m, n₁, n₂, rfl⟩
lemma smul_tmul (r : R) (m : M) (n : N) : (r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ (r • n) :=
sub_eq_zero.1 $ eq.symm $ quotient.sound $
group.in_closure.basic $ or.inr $ or.inr $ ⟨r, m, n, rfl⟩
local attribute [instance] quotient_add_group.is_add_group_hom_quotient_lift
def smul.aux (r : R) : free_abelian_group (M × N) → M ⊗ N :=
free_abelian_group.lift (λ (y : M × N), (r • y.1) ⊗ₜ y.2)
instance (r : R) : is_add_group_hom (smul.aux r : _ → M ⊗ N) :=
by unfold smul.aux; apply_instance
instance : has_scalar R (M ⊗ N) :=
⟨λ r, quotient_add_group.lift _ (smul.aux r) $ λ x hx, begin
refine (is_add_group_hom.mem_ker (smul.aux r : _ → M ⊗ N)).1
(add_group.closure_subset _ hx),
clear hx x, rintro x (⟨m₁, m₂, n, rfl⟩ | ⟨m, n₁, n₂, rfl⟩ | ⟨q, m, n, rfl⟩);
simp only [smul.aux, is_add_group_hom.mem_ker, -sub_eq_add_neg,
sub_self, add_tmul, tmul_add, smul_tmul,
smul_add, smul_smul, mul_comm, free_abelian_group.lift.coe,
free_abelian_group.lift.add, free_abelian_group.lift.sub]
end⟩
instance smul.is_add_group_hom (r : R) : is_add_group_hom ((•) r : M ⊗ N → M ⊗ N) :=
by unfold has_scalar.smul; apply_instance
protected theorem smul_add (r : R) (x y : M ⊗ N) :
r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
is_add_group_hom.add _ _ _
instance : module R (M ⊗ N) := module.of_core
{ smul := (•),
smul_add := tensor_product.smul_add,
add_smul := begin
intros r s x,
apply quotient_add_group.induction_on' x,
intro z,
symmetry,
refine @free_abelian_group.lift.unique _ _ _ _ _ ⟨λ p q, _⟩ _ z,
{ simp [tensor_product.smul_add] },
rintro ⟨m, n⟩,
change (r • m) ⊗ₜ n + (s • m) ⊗ₜ n = ((r + s) • m) ⊗ₜ n,
rw [add_smul, add_tmul]
end,
mul_smul := begin
intros r s x,
apply quotient_add_group.induction_on' x,
intro z,
symmetry,
refine @free_abelian_group.lift.unique _ _ _ _ _
⟨λ p q, _⟩ _ z,
{ simp [tensor_product.smul_add] },
rintro ⟨m, n⟩,
change r • s • (m ⊗ₜ n) = ((r * s) • m) ⊗ₜ n,
rw mul_smul, refl
end,
one_smul := λ x, quotient.induction_on x $ λ _,
eq.symm $ free_abelian_group.lift.unique _ _ $ λ ⟨p, q⟩,
by rw one_smul; refl }
@[simp] lemma tmul_smul (r : R) (x : M) (y : N) : x ⊗ₜ (r • y) = r • (x ⊗ₜ y) :=
(smul_tmul _ _ _).symm
variables (R M N)
def mk : M →ₗ N →ₗ M ⊗ N :=
linear_map.mk₂ (⊗ₜ) add_tmul (λ c m n, by rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul]) tmul_add tmul_smul
variables {R M N}
@[simp] lemma mk_apply (m : M) (n : N) : mk R M N m n = m ⊗ₜ n := rfl
lemma zero_tmul (n : N) : (0 ⊗ₜ n : M ⊗ N) = 0 := (mk R M N).map_zero₂ _
lemma tmul_zero (m : M) : (m ⊗ₜ 0 : M ⊗ N) = 0 := (mk R M N _).map_zero
lemma neg_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (-m) ⊗ₜ n = -(m ⊗ₜ n) := (mk R M N).map_neg₂ _ _
lemma tmul_neg (m : M) (n : N) : m ⊗ₜ (-n) = -(m ⊗ₜ n) := (mk R M N _).map_neg _
end module
local attribute [instance] quotient_add_group.left_rel normal_add_subgroup.to_is_add_subgroup
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on
{C : M ⊗ N → Prop}
(z : M ⊗ N)
(C0 : C 0)
(C1 : ∀ x y, C $ x ⊗ₜ y)
(Cp : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C z :=
quotient.induction_on z $ λ x, free_abelian_group.induction_on x
C0 (λ ⟨p, q⟩, C1 p q)
(λ ⟨p, q⟩ _, show C (-(p ⊗ₜ q)), by rw ← neg_tmul; from C1 (-p) q)
(λ _ _, Cp _ _)
section UMP
variables {M N P Q}
variables (f : M →ₗ N →ₗ P)
local attribute [instance] free_abelian_group.lift.is_add_group_hom
def lift_aux : M ⊗ N → P :=
quotient_add_group.lift _
(free_abelian_group.lift $ λ z, f z.1 z.2) $ λ x hx,
begin
refine (is_add_group_hom.mem_ker _).1 (add_group.closure_subset _ hx),
clear hx x, rintro x (⟨m₁, m₂, n, rfl⟩ | ⟨m, n₁, n₂, rfl⟩ | ⟨q, m, n, rfl⟩);
simp [is_add_group_hom.mem_ker, -sub_eq_add_neg,
f.map_add, f.map_add₂, f.map_smul, f.map_smul₂, sub_self],
end
variable {f}
local attribute [instance] quotient_add_group.left_rel normal_add_subgroup.to_is_add_subgroup
@[simp] lemma lift_aux.add (x y) : lift_aux f (x + y) = lift_aux f x + lift_aux f y :=
quotient.induction_on₂ x y $ λ m n, free_abelian_group.lift.add _ _ _
@[simp] lemma lift_aux.smul (r x) : lift_aux f (r • x) = r • lift_aux f x :=
tensor_product.induction_on _ _ x (smul_zero _).symm
(λ p q, by rw [← tmul_smul]; simp [lift_aux, tmul])
(λ p q ih1 ih2, by simp [@smul_add _ _ _ _ _ _ p _,
lift_aux.add, ih1, ih2, smul_add])
variable (f)
def lift : M ⊗ N →ₗ P :=
{ to_fun := lift_aux f,
add := lift_aux.add,
smul := lift_aux.smul }
variable {f}
@[simp] lemma lift.tmul (x y) : lift f (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
zero_add _
@[simp] lemma lift.tmul' (x y) : (lift f).1 (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
lift.tmul _ _
theorem lift.unique {g : linear_map (M ⊗ N) P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y) :
g = lift f :=
linear_map.ext $ λ z, begin
apply quotient_add_group.induction_on' z,
intro z,
refine @free_abelian_group.lift.unique _ _ _ _ _ ⟨λ p q, _⟩ _ z,
{ simp [g.2] },
exact λ ⟨m, n⟩, H m n
end
theorem lift_mk : lift (mk R M N) = linear_map.id :=
eq.symm $ lift.unique $ λ x y, rfl
theorem lift_compr₂ (g : P →ₗ Q) : lift (f.compr₂ g) = g.comp (lift f) :=
eq.symm $ lift.unique $ λ x y, by simp
theorem lift_mk_compr₂ (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ P) : lift ((mk R M N).compr₂ f) = f :=
by rw [lift_compr₂, lift_mk, linear_map.comp_id]
theorem ext {g h : M ⊗ N →ₗ P}
(H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = h (x ⊗ₜ y)) : g = h :=
by rw ← lift_mk_compr₂ h; exact lift.unique H
theorem mk_compr₂_inj {g h : M ⊗ N →ₗ P}
(H : (mk R M N).compr₂ g = (mk R M N).compr₂ h) : g = h :=
by rw [← lift_mk_compr₂ g, H, lift_mk_compr₂]
example : M → N → (M → N → P) → P :=
λ m, flip $ λ f, f m
variables (M N P)
def uncurry : (M →ₗ N →ₗ P) →ₗ M ⊗ N →ₗ P :=
linear_map.flip $ lift $ (linear_map.lflip _ _ _ _).comp linear_map.id.flip
variables {M N P}
@[simp] theorem uncurry_apply (f : M →ₗ N →ₗ P) (m : M) (n : N) :
uncurry M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
by rw [uncurry, linear_map.flip_apply, lift.tmul]; refl
variables (M N P)
def lift.equiv : (M →ₗ N →ₗ P) ≃ₗ (M ⊗ N →ₗ P) :=
{ inv_fun := λ f, (mk R M N).compr₂ f,
left_inv := λ f, linear_map.ext₂ $ λ m n, lift.tmul _ _,
right_inv := λ f, ext $ λ m n, lift.tmul _ _,
.. uncurry M N P }
def lcurry : (M ⊗ N →ₗ P) →ₗ M →ₗ N →ₗ P :=
(lift.equiv M N P).symm
variables {M N P}
@[simp] theorem lcurry_apply (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ P) (m : M) (n : N) :
lcurry M N P f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) := rfl
def curry (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ P) : M →ₗ N →ₗ P := lcurry M N P f
@[simp] theorem curry_apply (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ P) (m : M) (n : N) :
curry f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) := rfl
end UMP
variables {M N}
protected def lid : R ⊗ M ≃ₗ M :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (lift $ linear_map.lsmul R M) (mk R R M 1)
(linear_map.ext $ λ _, by simp)
(ext $ λ r m, by simp; rw [← tmul_smul, ← smul_tmul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one])
protected def comm : M ⊗ N ≃ₗ N ⊗ M :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (lift (mk R N M).flip) (lift (mk R M N).flip)
(ext $ λ m n, rfl)
(ext $ λ m n, rfl)
open linear_map
protected def assoc : (M ⊗ N) ⊗ P ≃ₗ M ⊗ (N ⊗ P) :=
begin
refine linear_equiv.of_linear
(lift $ lift $ comp (lcurry _ _ _) $ mk _ _ _)
(lift $ comp (uncurry _ _ _) $ curry $ mk _ _ _)
(mk_compr₂_inj $ linear_map.ext $ λ m, ext $ λ n p, _)
(mk_compr₂_inj $ flip_inj $ linear_map.ext $ λ p, ext $ λ m n, _);
repeat { rw lift.tmul <|> rw compr₂_apply <|> rw comp_apply <|>
rw mk_apply <|> rw flip_apply <|> rw lcurry_apply <|>
rw uncurry_apply <|> rw curry_apply <|> rw id_apply }
end
def map (f : M →ₗ P) (g : N →ₗ Q) : M ⊗ N →ₗ P ⊗ Q :=
lift $ comp (compl₂ (mk _ _ _) g) f
@[simp] theorem map_tmul (f : M →ₗ P) (g : N →ₗ Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
map f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
rfl
def congr (f : M ≃ₗ P) (g : N ≃ₗ Q) : M ⊗ N ≃ₗ P ⊗ Q :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (map f g) (map f.symm g.symm)
(ext $ λ m n, by simp; simp only [linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply])
(ext $ λ m n, by simp; simp only [linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply])
end tensor_product
|
73cdd1d9754eea5f0adeb7044d5c73a9404c9f3a | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/algebra/regular/pow.lean | 342cc2f4338e7568eefdba28ca7ec00cb8bdacb0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,232 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import algebra.group_power.basic
import algebra.hom.iterate
import algebra.regular.basic
/-!
# Regular elements
## Implementation details
Group powers and other definitions import a lot of the algebra hierarchy.
Lemmas about them are kept separate to be able to provide `is_regular` early in the
algebra hierarchy.
-/
variables {R : Type*} {a b : R}
section monoid
variable [monoid R]
/-- Any power of a left-regular element is left-regular. -/
lemma is_left_regular.pow (n : ℕ) (rla : is_left_regular a) : is_left_regular (a ^ n) :=
by simp only [is_left_regular, ← mul_left_iterate, rla.iterate n]
/-- Any power of a right-regular element is right-regular. -/
lemma is_right_regular.pow (n : ℕ) (rra : is_right_regular a) : is_right_regular (a ^ n) :=
by { rw [is_right_regular, ← mul_right_iterate], exact rra.iterate n }
/-- Any power of a regular element is regular. -/
lemma is_regular.pow (n : ℕ) (ra : is_regular a) : is_regular (a ^ n) :=
⟨is_left_regular.pow n ra.left, is_right_regular.pow n ra.right⟩
/-- An element `a` is left-regular if and only if a positive power of `a` is left-regular. -/
lemma is_left_regular.pow_iff {n : ℕ} (n0 : 0 < n) :
is_left_regular (a ^ n) ↔ is_left_regular a :=
begin
refine ⟨_, is_left_regular.pow n⟩,
rw [← nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n0, pow_succ'],
exact is_left_regular.of_mul,
end
/-- An element `a` is right-regular if and only if a positive power of `a` is right-regular. -/
lemma is_right_regular.pow_iff {n : ℕ} (n0 : 0 < n) :
is_right_regular (a ^ n) ↔ is_right_regular a :=
begin
refine ⟨_, is_right_regular.pow n⟩,
rw [← nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n0, pow_succ],
exact is_right_regular.of_mul,
end
/-- An element `a` is regular if and only if a positive power of `a` is regular. -/
lemma is_regular.pow_iff {n : ℕ} (n0 : 0 < n) :
is_regular (a ^ n) ↔ is_regular a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨(is_left_regular.pow_iff n0).mp h.left, (is_right_regular.pow_iff n0).mp h.right⟩,
λ h, ⟨is_left_regular.pow n h.left, is_right_regular.pow n h.right⟩⟩
end monoid
|
a953599e539215be5ad1a49d54747a6442ddbf32 | f3a5af2927397cf346ec0e24312bfff077f00425 | /src/game/world3/level6.lean | 7394503f6b595cda9bf04981996d98c2c3cecf78 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ImperialCollegeLondon/natural_number_game | 05c39e1586408cfb563d1a12e1085a90726ab655 | f29b6c2884299fc63fdfc81ae5d7daaa3219f9fd | refs/heads/master | 1,688,570,964,990 | 1,636,908,242,000 | 1,636,908,242,000 | 195,403,790 | 277 | 84 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,547,955,000 | 1,562,328,792,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,262 | lean | import game.world3.level5 -- hide
import mynat.mul -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/-
# Multiplication World
## Level 6: `succ_mul`
We now begin our journey to `mul_comm`, the proof that `a * b = b * a`.
We'll get there in level 8. Until we're there, it is frustrating
but true that we cannot assume commutativity. We have `mul_succ`
but we're going to need `succ_mul` (guess what it says -- maybe you
are getting the hang of Lean's naming conventions).
Remember also that we have tools like
* `add_right_comm a b c : a + b + c = a + c + b`
These things are the tools we need to slowly build up the results
which we will need to do mathematics "normally".
We also now have access to Lean's `simp` tactic,
which will solve any goal which just needs a bunch
of rewrites of `add_assoc` and `add_comm`. Use if
you're getting lazy!
-/
/- Lemma
For all natural numbers $a$ and $b$, we have
$$ \operatorname{succ}(a) \times b = ab + b. $$
-/
lemma succ_mul (a b : mynat) : succ a * b = a * b + b :=
begin [nat_num_game]
induction b with d hd,
{
rw mul_zero,
rw mul_zero,
rw add_zero,
refl,
},
{
rw mul_succ,
rw mul_succ,
rw hd,
rw add_succ,
rw add_succ,
rw add_right_comm,
refl,
}
end
end mynat -- hide
|
91738065c16f083de09bb296f9e32bd0a8b690d9 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/tactic/abel_auto.lean | 8d2f93d4fd67a2b5b1806e51c228b876ea8aade8 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,403 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.tactic.norm_num
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 l
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# The `abel` tactic
Evaluate expressions in the language of additive, commutative monoids and groups.
-/
namespace tactic
namespace abel
def term {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) (a : α) : α := n •ℕ x + a
def termg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (n : ℤ) (x : α) (a : α) : α := n •ℤ x + a
theorem const_add_term {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (k : α) (n : ℕ) (x : α) (a : α) (a' : α)
(h : k + a = a') : k + term n x a = term n x a' :=
sorry
theorem const_add_termg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (k : α) (n : ℤ) (x : α) (a : α) (a' : α)
(h : k + a = a') : k + termg n x a = termg n x a' :=
sorry
theorem term_add_const {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) (a : α) (k : α) (a' : α)
(h : a + k = a') : term n x a + k = term n x a' :=
sorry
theorem term_add_constg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (n : ℤ) (x : α) (a : α) (k : α) (a' : α)
(h : a + k = a') : termg n x a + k = termg n x a' :=
sorry
theorem term_add_term {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (n₁ : ℕ) (x : α) (a₁ : α) (n₂ : ℕ) (a₂ : α)
(n' : ℕ) (a' : α) (h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n') (h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') :
term n₁ x a₁ + term n₂ x a₂ = term n' x a' :=
sorry
theorem term_add_termg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (n₁ : ℤ) (x : α) (a₁ : α) (n₂ : ℤ) (a₂ : α)
(n' : ℤ) (a' : α) (h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n') (h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') :
termg n₁ x a₁ + termg n₂ x a₂ = termg n' x a' :=
sorry
theorem zero_term {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (x : α) (a : α) : term 0 x a = a := sorry
theorem zero_termg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (x : α) (a : α) : termg 0 x a = a := sorry
theorem term_neg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (n : ℤ) (x : α) (a : α) (n' : ℤ) (a' : α)
(h₁ : -n = n') (h₂ : -a = a') : -termg n x a = termg n' x a' :=
sorry
def smul {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) : α := n •ℕ x
def smulg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (n : ℤ) (x : α) : α := n •ℤ x
theorem zero_smul {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (c : ℕ) : smul c 0 = 0 := sorry
theorem zero_smulg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (c : ℤ) : smulg c 0 = 0 := sorry
theorem term_smul {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (c : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (x : α) (a : α) (n' : ℕ)
(a' : α) (h₁ : c * n = n') (h₂ : smul c a = a') : smul c (term n x a) = term n' x a' :=
sorry
theorem term_smulg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (c : ℤ) (n : ℤ) (x : α) (a : α) (n' : ℤ)
(a' : α) (h₁ : c * n = n') (h₂ : smulg c a = a') : smulg c (termg n x a) = termg n' x a' :=
sorry
theorem term_atom {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (x : α) : x = term 1 x 0 := sorry
theorem term_atomg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (x : α) : x = termg 1 x 0 := sorry
theorem unfold_sub {α : Type u_1} [add_group α] (a : α) (b : α) (c : α) (h : a + -b = c) :
a - b = c :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (a - b = c)) (sub_eq_add_neg a b)))
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (a + -b = c)) h)) (Eq.refl c))
theorem unfold_smul {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) (y : α) (h : smul n x = y) :
n •ℕ x = y :=
h
theorem unfold_smulg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) (y : α)
(h : smulg (Int.ofNat n) x = y) : n •ℕ x = y :=
h
theorem unfold_gsmul {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (n : ℤ) (x : α) (y : α) (h : smulg n x = y) :
n •ℤ x = y :=
h
theorem subst_into_smul {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_monoid α] (l : ℕ) (r : α) (tl : ℕ) (tr : α) (t : α)
(prl : l = tl) (prr : r = tr) (prt : smul tl tr = t) : smul l r = t :=
sorry
theorem subst_into_smulg {α : Type u_1} [add_comm_group α] (l : ℤ) (r : α) (tl : ℤ) (tr : α) (t : α)
(prl : l = tl) (prr : r = tr) (prt : smulg tl tr = t) : smulg l r = t :=
sorry
inductive normalize_mode where
| raw : normalize_mode
| term : normalize_mode
protected instance normalize_mode.inhabited : Inhabited normalize_mode :=
{ default := normalize_mode.term }
end abel
namespace interactive
/-- Tactic for solving equations in the language of
*additive*, commutative monoids and groups.
This version of `abel` fails if the target is not an equality
that is provable by the axioms of commutative monoids/groups. -/
/--
Evaluate expressions in the language of *additive*, commutative monoids and groups.
It attempts to prove the goal outright if there is no `at`
specifier and the target is an equality, but if this
fails, it falls back to rewriting all monoid expressions into a normal form.
If there is an `at` specifier, it rewrites the given target into a normal form.
```lean
example {α : Type*} {a b : α} [add_comm_monoid α] : a + (b + a) = a + a + b := by abel
example {α : Type*} {a b : α} [add_comm_group α] : (a + b) - ((b + a) + a) = -a := by abel
example {α : Type*} {a b : α} [add_comm_group α] (hyp : a + a - a = b - b) : a = 0 :=
by { abel at hyp, exact hyp }
```
-/
end Mathlib |
3329cc763733ff8889b1bb80a24dad8b23b4fac4 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /tmp/new-frontend/parser/pratt.lean | 842c5e7ce0c115fb2784d0d2f07040eea489d189 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,835 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sebastian Ullrich
A Combinator for building Pratt parsers
-/
prelude
import init.lean.parser.token
namespace Lean.Parser
open MonadParsec Combinators
variables {baseM : Type → Type}
variables [Monad baseM] [monadBasicParser baseM] [MonadParsec Syntax baseM] [MonadReader ParserConfig baseM]
local notation `m` := RecT Nat Syntax baseM
local notation `Parser` := m Syntax
def currLbp : m Nat :=
do Except.ok tk ← monadLift peekToken | pure 0,
match tk with
| Syntax.atom ⟨_, sym⟩ := do
cfg ← read,
some ⟨_, tkCfg⟩ ← pure (cfg.tokens.oldMatchPrefix sym.mkOldIterator) | error "currLbp: unreachable",
pure tkCfg.lbp
| Syntax.ident _ := pure maxPrec
| Syntax.rawNode {kind := @number, ..} := pure maxPrec
| Syntax.rawNode {kind := @stringLit, ..} := pure maxPrec
| _ := error "currLbp: unknown token kind"
private def trailingLoop (trailing : ReaderT Syntax m Syntax) (rbp : Nat) : Nat → Syntax → Parser
| 0 _ := error "unreachable"
| (n+1) left := do
lbp ← currLbp,
if rbp < lbp then do
left ← trailing.run left,
trailingLoop n left
else
pure left
variables [MonadExcept (Parsec.Message Syntax) baseM] [Alternative baseM]
variables (leading : m Syntax) (trailing : ReaderT Syntax m Syntax) (p : m Syntax)
def prattParser : baseM Syntax :=
RecT.runParsec p $ λ rbp, do
left ← leading,
n ← remaining,
trailingLoop trailing rbp (n+1) left
instance prattParser.tokens [HasTokens leading] [HasTokens trailing] : HasTokens (prattParser leading trailing p) :=
⟨HasTokens.tokens leading ++ HasTokens.tokens trailing⟩
instance prattParser.View : HasView Syntax (prattParser leading trailing p) :=
default _
end Lean.Parser
|
8c9c0f4dc741d8db8aad2c61de12cee0c73c0779 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/diamond3.lean | 15d1e5901c85d4566e2d5f8a6fba14f15241fc35 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,134 | lean | structure A where
a : Nat
structure B where
a : Nat
b : Nat
c : Nat := a + b
structure C extends B where
d : Nat := 0
e : Nat := 0
structure D extends A, C
def f (a b : Nat) : D :=
{ a, b }
theorem ex1 (a b : Nat) : (f a b |>.c) = a + b :=
rfl
structure C' extends B where
d : Nat
e : Nat
c := d + e
structure D' extends A, C'
def f' (a b d e: Nat) : D' :=
{ a, b, d, e }
theorem ex2 (a b d e: Nat) : (f' a b d e |>.c) = d + e :=
rfl
structure D'' extends A, C' where
c := a
def f'' (a b d e : Nat) : D'' :=
{ a, b, d, e }
theorem ex3 (a b d e: Nat) : (f'' a b d e |>.c) = a :=
rfl
structure B1 where
a : Nat
b : Nat
structure C1 extends B1 where
d : Nat
e : Nat
c : Nat := b + e
structure D1 extends A, C1
def f1 (a b d e : Nat) : D1 :=
{ a, b, d, e }
theorem ex4 (a b d e: Nat) : (f1 a b d e |>.c) = b + e :=
rfl
structure B2 where
a : Nat
b : Nat
c : Nat
structure C2 extends B2 where
d : Nat
e : Nat
c := b + e
structure D2 extends A, C2
def f2 (a b d e : Nat) : D2 :=
{ a, b, d, e }
theorem ex5 (a b d e: Nat) : (f2 a b d e |>.c) = b + e :=
rfl
|
d328e4e6346607d7a89183ac142b5bc38dabd97a | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/data/set/lattice.lean | fd376823eaff3eb2ce1bc2448eae15e9d82082e8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,572 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-- QUESTION: can make the first argument in ∀ x ∈ a, ... implicit?
-/
import order.complete_boolean_algebra
import data.sigma.basic
import order.galois_connection
open function tactic set auto
universes u v w x y
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {ι' : Sort y}
namespace set
instance lattice_set : complete_lattice (set α) :=
{ le := (⊆),
lt := (⊂),
sup := (∪),
inf := (∩),
top := univ,
bot := ∅,
Sup := λs, {a | ∃ t ∈ s, a ∈ t },
Inf := λs, {a | ∀ t ∈ s, a ∈ t },
le_Sup := assume s t t_in a a_in, ⟨t, ⟨t_in, a_in⟩⟩,
Sup_le := assume s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩, h t' t'_in a_in,
le_Inf := assume s t h a a_in t' t'_in, h t' t'_in a_in,
Inf_le := assume s t t_in a h, h _ t_in,
.. (infer_instance : complete_lattice (α → Prop)) }
instance : distrib_lattice (set α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := λ s t u x, or_and_distrib_left.2, ..set.lattice_set }
@[simp] lemma bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : set α) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sup_eq_union (s t : set α) : s ⊔ t = s ∪ t := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_eq_inter (s t : set α) : s ⊓ t = s ∩ t := rfl
@[simp] lemma le_eq_subset (s t : set α) : s ≤ t = (s ⊆ t) := rfl
@[simp] lemma lt_eq_ssubset (s t : set α) : s < t = (s ⊂ t) := rfl
/-- Image is monotone. See `set.image_image` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : monotone (image f) :=
assume s t, assume h : s ⊆ t, image_subset _ h
theorem monotone_inter [preorder β] {f g : β → set α}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λx, f x ∩ g x) :=
assume b₁ b₂ h, inter_subset_inter (hf h) (hg h)
theorem monotone_union [preorder β] {f g : β → set α}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λx, f x ∪ g x) :=
assume b₁ b₂ h, union_subset_union (hf h) (hg h)
theorem monotone_set_of [preorder α] {p : α → β → Prop}
(hp : ∀b, monotone (λa, p a b)) : monotone (λa, {b | p a b}) :=
assume a a' h b, hp b h
section galois_connection
variables {f : α → β}
protected lemma image_preimage : galois_connection (image f) (preimage f) :=
assume a b, image_subset_iff
/-- `kern_image f s` is the set of `y` such that `f ⁻¹ y ⊆ s` -/
def kern_image (f : α → β) (s : set α) : set β := {y | ∀ ⦃x⦄, f x = y → x ∈ s}
protected lemma preimage_kern_image : galois_connection (preimage f) (kern_image f) :=
assume a b,
⟨ assume h x hx y hy, have f y ∈ a, from hy.symm ▸ hx, h this,
assume h x (hx : f x ∈ a), h hx rfl⟩
end galois_connection
/- union and intersection over a family of sets indexed by a type -/
/-- Indexed union of a family of sets -/
@[reducible] def Union (s : ι → set β) : set β := supr s
/-- Indexed intersection of a family of sets -/
@[reducible] def Inter (s : ι → set β) : set β := infi s
notation `⋃` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, Union f) := r
notation `⋂` binders `, ` r:(scoped f, Inter f) := r
@[simp] theorem mem_Union {x : β} {s : ι → set β} : x ∈ Union s ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ s i :=
⟨assume ⟨t, ⟨⟨a, (t_eq : s a = t)⟩, (h : x ∈ t)⟩⟩, ⟨a, t_eq.symm ▸ h⟩,
assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨s a, ⟨⟨a, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩⟩
/- alternative proof: dsimp [Union, supr, Sup]; simp -/
-- TODO: more rewrite rules wrt forall / existentials and logical connectives
-- TODO: also eliminate ∃i, ... ∧ i = t ∧ ...
theorem set_of_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : {x | ∃ i, p i x} = ⋃ i, {x | p i x} :=
ext $ λ i, mem_Union.symm
@[simp] theorem mem_Inter {x : β} {s : ι → set β} : x ∈ Inter s ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ s i :=
⟨assume (h : ∀a ∈ {a : set β | ∃i, s i = a}, x ∈ a) a, h (s a) ⟨a, rfl⟩,
assume h t ⟨a, (eq : s a = t)⟩, eq ▸ h a⟩
theorem set_of_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : {x | ∀ i, p i x} = ⋂ i, {x | p i x} :=
ext $ λ i, mem_Inter.symm
theorem Union_subset {s : ι → set β} {t : set β} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : (⋃ i, s i) ⊆ t :=
-- TODO: should be simpler when sets' order is based on lattices
@supr_le (set β) _ set.lattice_set _ _ h
theorem Union_subset_iff {s : ι → set β} {t : set β} : (⋃ i, s i) ⊆ t ↔ (∀ i, s i ⊆ t) :=
⟨assume h i, subset.trans (le_supr s _) h, Union_subset⟩
theorem mem_Inter_of_mem {x : β} {s : ι → set β} : (∀ i, x ∈ s i) → (x ∈ ⋂ i, s i) :=
mem_Inter.2
theorem subset_Inter {t : set β} {s : ι → set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
-- TODO: should be simpler when sets' order is based on lattices
@le_infi (set β) _ set.lattice_set _ _ h
theorem subset_Union : ∀ (s : ι → set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) := le_supr
-- This rather trivial consequence is convenient with `apply`,
-- and has `i` explicit for this use case.
theorem subset_subset_Union
{A : set β} {s : ι → set β} (i : ι) (h : A ⊆ s i) : A ⊆ ⋃ (i : ι), s i :=
subset.trans h (subset_Union s i)
theorem Inter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → set β) (i : ι), (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ s i := infi_le
lemma Inter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} (i : ι)
(h : s i ⊆ t) : (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ t :=
set.subset.trans (set.Inter_subset s i) h
lemma Inter_subset_Inter {s t : ι → set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) :
(⋂ i, s i) ⊆ (⋂ i, t i) :=
set.subset_Inter $ λ i, set.Inter_subset_of_subset i (h i)
lemma Inter_subset_Inter2 {s : ι → set α} {t : ι' → set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
(⋂ i, s i) ⊆ (⋂ j, t j) :=
set.subset_Inter $ λ j, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j in Inter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem Union_const [nonempty ι] (s : set β) : (⋃ i:ι, s) = s :=
ext $ by simp
theorem Inter_const [nonempty ι] (s : set β) : (⋂ i:ι, s) = s :=
ext $ by simp
@[simp] -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem compl_Union (s : ι → set β) : - (⋃ i, s i) = (⋂ i, - s i) :=
ext (by simp)
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem compl_Inter (s : ι → set β) : -(⋂ i, s i) = (⋃ i, - s i) :=
ext (λ x, by simp [classical.not_forall])
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem Union_eq_comp_Inter_comp (s : ι → set β) : (⋃ i, s i) = - (⋂ i, - s i) :=
by simp [compl_Inter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem Inter_eq_comp_Union_comp (s : ι → set β) : (⋂ i, s i) = - (⋃ i, -s i) :=
by simp [compl_compl]
theorem inter_Union (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∩ (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
ext $ by simp
theorem Union_inter (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
ext $ by simp
theorem Union_union_distrib (s : ι → set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, s i ∪ t i) = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ (⋃ i, t i) :=
ext $ by simp [exists_or_distrib]
theorem Inter_inter_distrib (s : ι → set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋂ i, s i ∩ t i) = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ (⋂ i, t i) :=
ext $ by simp [forall_and_distrib]
theorem union_Union [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∪ (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
by rw [Union_union_distrib, Union_const]
theorem Union_union [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
by rw [Union_union_distrib, Union_const]
theorem inter_Inter [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∩ (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
by rw [Inter_inter_distrib, Inter_const]
theorem Inter_inter [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
by rw [Inter_inter_distrib, Inter_const]
-- classical
theorem union_Inter (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s ∪ (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
ext $ assume x, by simp [classical.forall_or_distrib_left]
theorem Union_diff (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
(⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
Union_inter _ _
theorem diff_Union [nonempty ι] (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s \ (⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i :=
by rw [diff_eq, compl_Union, inter_Inter]; refl
theorem diff_Inter (s : set β) (t : ι → set β) :
s \ (⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i :=
by rw [diff_eq, compl_Inter, inter_Union]; refl
lemma directed_on_Union {r} {ι : Sort v} {f : ι → set α} (hd : directed (⊆) f)
(h : ∀x, directed_on r (f x)) : directed_on r (⋃x, f x) :=
by simp only [directed_on, exists_prop, mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib]; exact
assume a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂,
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂,
⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂) in
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
/- bounded unions and intersections -/
theorem mem_bUnion_iff {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {y : β} :
y ∈ (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x := by simp
theorem mem_bInter_iff {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {y : β} :
y ∈ (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x := by simp
theorem mem_bUnion {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
by simp; exact ⟨x, ⟨xs, ytx⟩⟩
theorem mem_bInter {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
by simp; assumption
theorem bUnion_subset {s : set α} {t : set β} {u : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, u x ⊆ t) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ⊆ t :=
show (⨆ x ∈ s, u x) ≤ t, -- TODO: should not be necessary when sets' order is based on lattices
from supr_le $ assume x, supr_le (h x)
theorem subset_bInter {s : set α} {t : set β} {u : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t ⊆ u x) :
t ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) :=
subset_Inter $ assume x, subset_Inter $ h x
theorem subset_bUnion_of_mem {s : set α} {u : α → set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) :=
show u x ≤ (⨆ x ∈ s, u x),
from le_supr_of_le x $ le_supr _ xs
theorem bInter_subset_of_mem {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
(⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ t x :=
show (⨅x ∈ s, t x) ≤ t x,
from infi_le_of_le x $ infi_le _ xs
theorem bUnion_subset_bUnion_left {s s' : set α} {t : α → set β}
(h : s ⊆ s') : (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s', t x) :=
bUnion_subset (λ x xs, subset_bUnion_of_mem (h xs))
theorem bInter_subset_bInter_left {s s' : set α} {t : α → set β}
(h : s' ⊆ s) : (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s', t x) :=
subset_bInter (λ x xs, bInter_subset_of_mem (h xs))
theorem bUnion_subset_bUnion_right {s : set α} {t1 t2 : α → set β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, t1 x ⊆ t2 x) : (⋃ x ∈ s, t1 x) ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s, t2 x) :=
bUnion_subset (λ x xs, subset.trans (h x xs) (subset_bUnion_of_mem xs))
theorem bInter_subset_bInter_right {s : set α} {t1 t2 : α → set β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, t1 x ⊆ t2 x) : (⋂ x ∈ s, t1 x) ⊆ (⋂ x ∈ s, t2 x) :=
subset_bInter (λ x xs, subset.trans (bInter_subset_of_mem xs) (h x xs))
theorem bUnion_subset_bUnion {γ : Type*} {s : set α} {t : α → set β} {s' : set γ} {t' : γ → set β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s', t x ⊆ t' y) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ y ∈ s', t' y) :=
begin
intros x,
simp only [mem_Union],
rintros ⟨a, a_in, ha⟩,
rcases h a a_in with ⟨c, c_in, hc⟩,
exact ⟨c, c_in, hc ha⟩
end
theorem bUnion_mono {s : set α} {t t' : α → set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ x ∈ s, t' x) :=
bUnion_subset_bUnion (λ x x_in, ⟨x, x_in, h x x_in⟩)
theorem bUnion_eq_Union (s : set α) (t : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) = (⋃ x : s, t x.1) :=
set.ext $ by simp
theorem bInter_eq_Inter (s : set α) (t : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) = (⋂ x : s, t x.1) :=
set.ext $ by simp
theorem bInter_empty (u : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ (∅ : set α), u x) = univ :=
show (⨅x ∈ (∅ : set α), u x) = ⊤, -- simplifier should be able to rewrite x ∈ ∅ to false.
from infi_emptyset
theorem bInter_univ (u : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x) = ⋂ x, u x :=
infi_univ
-- TODO(Jeremy): here is an artifact of the the encoding of bounded intersection:
-- without dsimp, the next theorem fails to type check, because there is a lambda
-- in a type that needs to be contracted. Using simp [eq_of_mem_singleton xa] also works.
@[simp] theorem bInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → set β) : (⋂ x ∈ ({a} : set α), s x) = s a :=
show (⨅ x ∈ ({a} : set α), s x) = s a, by simp
theorem bInter_union (s t : set α) (u : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x) = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ (⋂ x ∈ t, u x) :=
show (⨅ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x) = (⨅ x ∈ s, u x) ⊓ (⨅ x ∈ t, u x),
from infi_union
-- TODO(Jeremy): simp [insert_eq, bInter_union] doesn't work
@[simp] theorem bInter_insert (a : α) (s : set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x) = t a ∩ (⋂ x ∈ s, t x) :=
begin rw insert_eq, simp [bInter_union] end
-- TODO(Jeremy): another example of where an annotation is needed
theorem bInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → set β) :
(⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : set α), s x) = s a ∩ s b :=
by simp [inter_comm]
theorem bUnion_empty (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ (∅ : set α), s x) = ∅ :=
supr_emptyset
theorem bUnion_univ (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x) = ⋃ x, s x :=
supr_univ
@[simp] theorem bUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → set β) : (⋃ x ∈ ({a} : set α), s x) = s a :=
supr_singleton
@[simp] theorem bUnion_of_singleton (s : set α) : (⋃ x ∈ s, {x}) = s :=
ext $ by simp
theorem bUnion_union (s t : set α) (u : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x) = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ (⋃ x ∈ t, u x) :=
supr_union
-- TODO(Jeremy): once again, simp doesn't do it alone.
@[simp] theorem bUnion_insert (a : α) (s : set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x) = t a ∪ (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
begin rw [insert_eq], simp [bUnion_union] end
theorem bUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : set α), s x) = s a ∪ s b :=
by simp [union_comm]
@[simp] -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem compl_bUnion (s : set α) (t : α → set β) : - (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = (⋂ i ∈ s, - t i) :=
ext (λ x, by simp)
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem compl_bInter (s : set α) (t : α → set β) : -(⋂ i ∈ s, t i) = (⋃ i ∈ s, - t i) :=
ext (λ x, by simp [classical.not_forall])
theorem inter_bUnion (s : set α) (t : α → set β) (u : set β) :
u ∩ (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, u ∩ t i :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, mem_inter_eq],
exact ⟨λ ⟨hx, ⟨i, is, xi⟩⟩, ⟨i, is, hx, xi⟩, λ ⟨i, is, hx, xi⟩, ⟨hx, ⟨i, is, xi⟩⟩⟩
end
theorem bUnion_inter (s : set α) (t : α → set β) (u : set β) :
(⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ∩ u = (⋃ i ∈ s, t i ∩ u) :=
by simp [@inter_comm _ _ u, inter_bUnion]
/-- Intersection of a set of sets. -/
@[reducible] def sInter (S : set (set α)) : set α := Inf S
prefix `⋂₀`:110 := sInter
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : set α} {S : set (set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ⟨ht, hx⟩⟩
theorem mem_sUnion {x : α} {S : set (set α)} : x ∈ ⋃₀ S ↔ ∃t ∈ S, x ∈ t := iff.rfl
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : set α} {S : set (set α)}
(hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S) (ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t :=
λ h, hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sInter {x : α} {S : set (set α)} : x ∈ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, x ∈ t := iff.rfl
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
Inf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_Sup tS
lemma subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : set α} (t : set (set α)) (u : set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (h : ∀t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : (⋃₀ S) ⊆ t :=
Sup_le h
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : set (set α)} {t : set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h t' ht', subset.trans (subset_sUnion_of_mem ht') h, sUnion_subset⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : set (set α)} {t : set α} (h : ∀t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ (⋂₀ S) :=
le_Inf h
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : set (set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset $ λ s hs, subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : set (set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter $ λ s hs, sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp] theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : set α) := Sup_empty
@[simp] theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : set α) := Inf_empty
@[simp] theorem sUnion_singleton (s : set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s := Sup_singleton
@[simp] theorem sInter_singleton (s : set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s := Inf_singleton
theorem sUnion_union (S T : set (set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T := Sup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : set (set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T := Inf_union
theorem sInter_Union (s : ι → set (set α)) : ⋂₀ (⋃ i, s i) = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_Inter, mem_sInter, exists_imp_distrib],
split ; tauto
end
@[simp] theorem sUnion_insert (s : set α) (T : set (set α)) : ⋃₀ (insert s T) = s ∪ ⋃₀ T := Sup_insert
@[simp] theorem sInter_insert (s : set α) (T : set (set α)) : ⋂₀ (insert s T) = s ∩ ⋂₀ T := Inf_insert
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
Sup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
Inf_pair
@[simp] theorem sUnion_image (f : α → set β) (s : set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x := Sup_image
@[simp] theorem sInter_image (f : α → set β) (s : set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x := Inf_image
@[simp] theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → set β) : ⋃₀ (range f) = ⋃ x, f x := Sup_range
@[simp] theorem sInter_range (f : ι → set β) : ⋂₀ (range f) = ⋂ x, f x := Inf_range
lemma sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : set (set α)} :
⋃₀ c = @set.univ α ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b :=
⟨λ H a, let ⟨b, hm, hb⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 $ by rw H; exact mem_univ a in ⟨b, hm, hb⟩,
λ H, set.univ_subset_iff.1 $ λ x hx, let ⟨b, hm, hb⟩ := H x in set.mem_sUnion_of_mem hb hm⟩
theorem compl_sUnion (S : set (set α)) :
- ⋃₀ S = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
set.ext $ assume x,
⟨assume : ¬ (∃s∈S, x ∈ s), assume s h,
match s, h with
._, ⟨t, hs, rfl⟩ := assume h, this ⟨t, hs, h⟩
end,
assume : ∀s, s ∈ compl '' S → x ∈ s,
assume ⟨t, tS, xt⟩, this (compl t) (mem_image_of_mem _ tS) xt⟩
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : set (set α)) :
⋃₀ S = - ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
by rw [←compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : set (set α)) :
- ⋂₀ S = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) :=
by rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_comp_sUnion_compl (S : set (set α)) :
⋂₀ S = -(⋃₀ (compl '' S)) :=
by rw [←compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : set α} {S : set (set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) :
s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ by rw ← h; exact
inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_Union_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range (λ b, f ⟨a, b⟩) :=
set.ext $ by simp
theorem Union_eq_range_sigma (s : α → set β) : (⋃ i, s i) = range (λ a : Σ i, s i, a.2) :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
theorem Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : set (sigma σ)) :
(⋃ i, sigma.mk i '' (sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s)) = s :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_image, mem_preimage],
split,
{ rintros ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩, exact h },
{ intro h, cases x with i a, exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma sUnion_mono {s t : set (set α)} (h : s ⊆ t) : (⋃₀ s) ⊆ (⋃₀ t) :=
sUnion_subset $ assume t' ht', subset_sUnion_of_mem $ h ht'
lemma Union_subset_Union {s t : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, s i ⊆ t i) : (⋃i, s i) ⊆ (⋃i, t i) :=
@supr_le_supr (set α) ι _ s t h
lemma Union_subset_Union2 {ι₂ : Sort*} {s : ι → set α} {t : ι₂ → set α} (h : ∀i, ∃j, s i ⊆ t j) :
(⋃i, s i) ⊆ (⋃i, t i) :=
@supr_le_supr2 (set α) ι ι₂ _ s t h
lemma Union_subset_Union_const {ι₂ : Sort x} {s : set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : (⋃ i:ι, s) ⊆ (⋃ j:ι₂, s) :=
@supr_le_supr_const (set α) ι ι₂ _ s h
@[simp] lemma Union_of_singleton (α : Type u) : (⋃(x : α), {x}) = @set.univ α :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ h, ⟨⟩, λ h, ⟨{x}, ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, mem_singleton x⟩⟩⟩
theorem bUnion_subset_Union (s : set α) (t : α → set β) :
(⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ⊆ (⋃ x, t x) :=
Union_subset_Union $ λ i, Union_subset $ λ h, by refl
lemma sUnion_eq_bUnion {s : set (set α)} : (⋃₀ s) = (⋃ (i : set α) (h : i ∈ s), i) :=
set.ext $ by simp
lemma sInter_eq_bInter {s : set (set α)} : (⋂₀ s) = (⋂ (i : set α) (h : i ∈ s), i) :=
set.ext $ by simp
lemma sUnion_eq_Union {s : set (set α)} : (⋃₀ s) = (⋃ (i : s), i.1) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp
lemma sInter_eq_Inter {s : set (set α)} : (⋂₀ s) = (⋂ (i : s), i.1) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp
lemma union_eq_Union {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp [bool.exists_bool, or_comm]
lemma inter_eq_Inter {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp [bool.forall_bool, and_comm]
instance : complete_boolean_algebra (set α) :=
{ neg := compl,
sub := (\),
le_sup_inf := distrib_lattice.le_sup_inf,
inf_compl_eq_bot := assume s, ext $ assume x, ⟨assume ⟨h, nh⟩, nh h, false.elim⟩,
sup_compl_eq_top := assume s, ext $ assume x, ⟨assume h, trivial, assume _, classical.em $ x ∈ s⟩,
sub_eq := assume x y, rfl,
infi_sup_le_sup_Inf := assume s t x, show x ∈ (⋂ b ∈ t, s ∪ b) → x ∈ s ∪ (⋂₀ t),
by simp; exact assume h,
or.imp_right
(assume hn : x ∉ s, assume i hi, or.resolve_left (h i hi) hn)
(classical.em $ x ∈ s),
inf_Sup_le_supr_inf := assume s t x, show x ∈ s ∩ (⋃₀ t) → x ∈ (⋃ b ∈ t, s ∩ b),
by simp [-and_imp, and.left_comm],
..set.lattice_set }
lemma sInter_union_sInter {S T : set (set α)} :
(⋂₀S) ∪ (⋂₀T) = (⋂p ∈ set.prod S T, (p : (set α) × (set α)).1 ∪ p.2) :=
Inf_sup_Inf
lemma sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : set (set α)} :
(⋃₀s) ∩ (⋃₀t) = (⋃p ∈ set.prod s t, (p : (set α) × (set α )).1 ∩ p.2) :=
Sup_inf_Sup
lemma sInter_bUnion {S : set (set α)} {T : set α → set (set α)} (hT : ∀s∈S, s = ⋂₀ T s) :
⋂₀ (⋃s∈S, T s) = ⋂₀ S :=
begin
ext,
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, set.mem_sInter, set.mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib],
split,
{ assume H s sS,
rw [hT s sS, mem_sInter],
assume t tTs,
apply H t s sS tTs },
{ assume H t s sS tTs,
have xs : x ∈ s := H s sS,
have : s ⊆ t,
{ have Z := hT s sS,
rw sInter_eq_bInter at Z,
rw Z, apply bInter_subset_of_mem,
exact tTs },
exact this xs }
end
lemma sUnion_bUnion {S : set (set α)} {T : set α → set (set α)} (hT : ∀s∈S, s = ⋃₀ T s) :
⋃₀ (⋃s∈S, T s) = ⋃₀ S :=
begin
ext,
simp only [exists_prop, set.mem_Union, set.mem_set_of_eq],
split,
{ rintros ⟨t, ⟨⟨s, ⟨sS, tTs⟩⟩, xt⟩⟩,
refine ⟨s, ⟨sS, _⟩⟩,
rw hT s sS,
exact subset_sUnion_of_mem tTs xt },
{ rintros ⟨s, ⟨sS, xs⟩⟩,
rw hT s sS at xs,
rcases mem_sUnion.1 xs with ⟨t, tTs, xt⟩,
exact ⟨t, ⟨⟨s, ⟨sS, tTs⟩⟩, xt⟩⟩ }
end
lemma Union_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : set (set α))
{f : ∀(s : C), β → s} (hf : ∀(s : C), surjective (f s)) :
(⋃(y : β), range (λ(s : C), (f s y).val)) = ⋃₀ C :=
begin
ext x, split,
{ rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩⟩, refine ⟨_, hs, _⟩, exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2 },
{ rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩, cases hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy, refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, _⟩⟩,
exact congr_arg subtype.val hy }
end
lemma Union_range_eq_Union {ι α β : Type*} (C : ι → set α)
{f : ∀(x : ι), β → C x} (hf : ∀(x : ι), surjective (f x)) :
(⋃(y : β), range (λ(x : ι), (f x y).val)) = ⋃x, C x :=
begin
ext x, rw [mem_Union, mem_Union], split,
{ rintro ⟨y, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩, exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨i, hx⟩, cases hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy, refine ⟨y, ⟨i, congr_arg subtype.val hy⟩⟩ }
end
@[simp] theorem sub_eq_diff (s t : set α) : s - t = s \ t := rfl
section
variables {p : Prop} {μ : p → set α}
@[simp] lemma Inter_pos (hp : p) : (⋂h:p, μ h) = μ hp := infi_pos hp
@[simp] lemma Inter_neg (hp : ¬ p) : (⋂h:p, μ h) = univ := infi_neg hp
@[simp] lemma Union_pos (hp : p) : (⋃h:p, μ h) = μ hp := supr_pos hp
@[simp] lemma Union_neg (hp : ¬ p) : (⋃h:p, μ h) = ∅ := supr_neg hp
@[simp] lemma Union_empty {ι : Sort*} : (⋃i:ι, ∅:set α) = ∅ := supr_bot
@[simp] lemma Inter_univ {ι : Sort*} : (⋂i:ι, univ:set α) = univ := infi_top
end
section image
lemma image_Union {f : α → β} {s : ι → set α} : f '' (⋃ i, s i) = (⋃i, f '' s i) :=
begin
apply set.ext, intro x,
simp [image, exists_and_distrib_right.symm, -exists_and_distrib_right],
exact exists_swap
end
lemma univ_subtype {p : α → Prop} : (univ : set (subtype p)) = (⋃x (h : p x), {⟨x, h⟩}) :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨x, h⟩, by simp [h]
lemma range_eq_Union {ι} (f : ι → α) : range f = (⋃i, {f i}) :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp [@eq_comm α a]
lemma image_eq_Union (f : α → β) (s : set α) : f '' s = (⋃i∈s, {f i}) :=
set.ext $ assume b, by simp [@eq_comm β b]
@[simp] lemma bUnion_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → set β} : (⋃x ∈ range f, g x) = (⋃y, g (f y)) :=
by rw [← sUnion_image, ← range_comp, sUnion_range]
@[simp] lemma bInter_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → set β} : (⋂x ∈ range f, g x) = (⋂y, g (f y)) :=
by rw [← sInter_image, ← range_comp, sInter_range]
variables {s : set γ} {f : γ → α} {g : α → set β}
@[simp] lemma bUnion_image : (⋃x∈ (f '' s), g x) = (⋃y ∈ s, g (f y)) :=
by rw [← sUnion_image, ← image_comp, sUnion_image]
@[simp] lemma bInter_image : (⋂x∈ (f '' s), g x) = (⋂y ∈ s, g (f y)) :=
by rw [← sInter_image, ← image_comp, sInter_image]
end image
section preimage
theorem monotone_preimage {f : α → β} : monotone (preimage f) := assume a b h, preimage_mono h
@[simp] theorem preimage_Union {ι : Sort w} {f : α → β} {s : ι → set β} :
preimage f (⋃i, s i) = (⋃i, preimage f (s i)) :=
set.ext $ by simp [preimage]
theorem preimage_bUnion {ι} {f : α → β} {s : set ι} {t : ι → set β} :
preimage f (⋃i ∈ s, t i) = (⋃i ∈ s, preimage f (t i)) :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : set (set β)} :
preimage f (⋃₀ s) = (⋃t ∈ s, preimage f t) :=
set.ext $ by simp [preimage]
lemma preimage_Inter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' (⋂ i, s i) = (⋂ i, f ⁻¹' s i) :=
by ext; simp
lemma preimage_bInter {s : γ → set β} {t : set γ} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' (⋂ i∈t, s i) = (⋂ i∈t, f ⁻¹' s i) :=
by ext; simp
end preimage
section seq
def seq (s : set (α → β)) (t : set α) : set β := {b | ∃f∈s, ∃a∈t, (f : α → β) a = b}
lemma seq_def {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α} : seq s t = ⋃f∈s, f '' t :=
set.ext $ by simp [seq]
@[simp] lemma mem_seq_iff {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α} {b : β} :
b ∈ seq s t ↔ ∃ (f ∈ s) (a ∈ t), (f : α → β) a = b :=
iff.rfl
lemma seq_subset {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α} {u : set β} :
seq s t ⊆ u ↔ (∀f∈s, ∀a∈t, (f : α → β) a ∈ u) :=
iff.intro
(assume h f hf a ha, h ⟨f, hf, a, ha, rfl⟩)
(assume h b ⟨f, hf, a, ha, eq⟩, eq ▸ h f hf a ha)
lemma seq_mono {s₀ s₁ : set (α → β)} {t₀ t₁ : set α} (hs : s₀ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₀ ⊆ t₁) :
seq s₀ t₀ ⊆ seq s₁ t₁ :=
assume b ⟨f, hf, a, ha, eq⟩, ⟨f, hs hf, a, ht ha, eq⟩
lemma singleton_seq {f : α → β} {t : set α} : set.seq {f} t = f '' t :=
set.ext $ by simp
lemma seq_singleton {s : set (α → β)} {a : α} : set.seq s {a} = (λf:α→β, f a) '' s :=
set.ext $ by simp
lemma seq_seq {s : set (β → γ)} {t : set (α → β)} {u : set α} :
seq s (seq t u) = seq (seq ((∘) '' s) t) u :=
begin
refine set.ext (assume c, iff.intro _ _),
{ rintros ⟨f, hfs, b, ⟨g, hg, a, hau, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨f ∘ g, ⟨(∘) f, mem_image_of_mem _ hfs, g, hg, rfl⟩, a, hau, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨fg, ⟨fc, ⟨f, hfs, rfl⟩, g, hgt, rfl⟩, a, ha, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨f, hfs, g a, ⟨g, hgt, a, ha, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma image_seq {f : β → γ} {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α} :
f '' seq s t = seq ((∘) f '' s) t :=
by rw [← singleton_seq, ← singleton_seq, seq_seq, image_singleton]
lemma prod_eq_seq {s : set α} {t : set β} : set.prod s t = (prod.mk '' s).seq t :=
begin
ext ⟨a, b⟩,
split,
{ rintros ⟨ha, hb⟩, exact ⟨prod.mk a, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩, b, hb, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨f, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, y, hy, eq⟩, rw ← eq, exact ⟨hx, hy⟩ }
end
lemma prod_image_seq_comm (s : set α) (t : set β) :
(prod.mk '' s).seq t = seq ((λb a, (a, b)) '' t) s :=
by rw [← prod_eq_seq, ← image_swap_prod, prod_eq_seq, image_seq, ← image_comp]
end seq
theorem monotone_prod [preorder α] {f : α → set β} {g : α → set γ}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λx, set.prod (f x) (g x)) :=
assume a b h, prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
instance : monad set :=
{ pure := λ(α : Type u) a, {a},
bind := λ(α β : Type u) s f, ⋃i∈s, f i,
seq := λ(α β : Type u), set.seq,
map := λ(α β : Type u), set.image }
section monad
variables {α' β' : Type u} {s : set α'} {f : α' → set β'} {g : set (α' → β')}
@[simp] lemma bind_def : s >>= f = ⋃i∈s, f i := rfl
@[simp] lemma fmap_eq_image (f : α' → β') : f <$> s = f '' s := rfl
@[simp] lemma seq_eq_set_seq {α β : Type*} (s : set (α → β)) (t : set α) : s <*> t = s.seq t := rfl
@[simp] lemma pure_def (a : α) : (pure a : set α) = {a} := rfl
end monad
instance : is_lawful_monad set :=
{ pure_bind := assume α β x f, by simp,
bind_assoc := assume α β γ s f g, set.ext $ assume a,
by simp [exists_and_distrib_right.symm, -exists_and_distrib_right,
exists_and_distrib_left.symm, -exists_and_distrib_left, and_assoc];
exact exists_swap,
id_map := assume α, id_map,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := assume α β f s, set.ext $ by simp [set.image, eq_comm],
bind_map_eq_seq := assume α β s t, by simp [seq_def] }
instance : is_comm_applicative (set : Type u → Type u) :=
⟨ assume α β s t, prod_image_seq_comm s t ⟩
section pi
lemma pi_def {α : Type*} {π : α → Type*} (i : set α) (s : Πa, set (π a)) :
pi i s = (⋂ a∈i, ((λf:(Πa, π a), f a) ⁻¹' (s a))) :=
by ext; simp [pi]
end pi
end set
/- disjoint sets -/
namespace set
protected theorem disjoint_iff {s t : set α} : disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ ∅ := iff.rfl
lemma not_disjoint_iff {s t : set α} : ¬disjoint s t ↔ ∃x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
(not_congr (set.disjoint_iff.trans subset_empty_iff)).trans ne_empty_iff_nonempty
lemma disjoint_left {s t : set α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
show (∀ x, ¬(x ∈ s ∩ t)) ↔ _, from ⟨λ h a, not_and.1 $ h a, λ h a, not_and.2 $ h a⟩
theorem disjoint_right {s t : set α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ t → a ∉ s :=
by rw [disjoint.comm, disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_diff {a b : set α} : disjoint a (b \ a) :=
disjoint_iff.2 (inter_diff_self _ _)
theorem disjoint_compl (s : set α) : disjoint s (-s) := assume a ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ h₁
theorem disjoint_singleton_left {a : α} {s : set α} : disjoint {a} s ↔ a ∉ s :=
by simp [set.disjoint_iff, subset_def]; exact iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_singleton_right {a : α} {s : set α} : disjoint s {a} ↔ a ∉ s :=
by rw [disjoint.comm]; exact disjoint_singleton_left
theorem disjoint_image_image {f : β → α} {g : γ → α} {s : set β} {t : set γ}
(h : ∀b∈s, ∀c∈t, f b ≠ g c) : disjoint (f '' s) (g '' t) :=
by rintros a ⟨⟨b, hb, eq⟩, ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩⟩; exact h b hb c hc eq
/-- A collection of sets is `pairwise_disjoint`, if any two different sets in this collection
are disjoint. -/
def pairwise_disjoint (s : set (set α)) : Prop :=
pairwise_on s disjoint
lemma pairwise_disjoint.subset {s t : set (set α)} (h : s ⊆ t)
(ht : pairwise_disjoint t) : pairwise_disjoint s :=
pairwise_on.mono h ht
lemma pairwise_disjoint.range {s : set (set α)} (f : s → set α) (hf : ∀(x : s), f x ⊆ x.1)
(ht : pairwise_disjoint s) : pairwise_disjoint (range f) :=
begin
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ hxy, refine (ht _ x.2 _ y.2 _).mono (hf x) (hf y),
intro h, apply hxy, apply congr_arg f, exact subtype.eq h
end
/- warning: classical -/
lemma pairwise_disjoint.elim {s : set (set α)} (h : pairwise_disjoint s) {x y : set α}
(hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (z : α) (hzx : z ∈ x) (hzy : z ∈ y) : x = y :=
classical.not_not.1 $ λ h', h x hx y hy h' ⟨hzx, hzy⟩
end set
namespace set
variables (t : α → set β)
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigma_to_Union (x : Σi, t i) : (⋃i, t i) := ⟨x.2, mem_Union.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
lemma sigma_to_Union_surjective : surjective (sigma_to_Union t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ := have ∃a, b ∈ t a, by simpa using hb, let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this in ⟨⟨a, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩, rfl⟩
lemma sigma_to_Union_injective (h : ∀i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (t i) (t j)) :
injective (sigma_to_Union t)
| ⟨a₁, ⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩ ⟨a₂, ⟨b₂, h₂⟩⟩ eq :=
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂, from congr_arg subtype.val eq,
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂, from classical.by_contradiction $ assume ne,
have b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂, from ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩,
h _ _ ne this,
sigma.eq a_eq $ subtype.eq $ by subst b_eq; subst a_eq
lemma sigma_to_Union_bijective (h : ∀i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (t i) (t j)) :
bijective (sigma_to_Union t) :=
⟨sigma_to_Union_injective t h, sigma_to_Union_surjective t⟩
noncomputable def Union_eq_sigma_of_disjoint {t : α → set β}
(h : ∀i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (t i) (t j)) : (⋃i, t i) ≃ (Σi, t i) :=
(equiv.of_bijective _ $ sigma_to_Union_bijective t h).symm
noncomputable def bUnion_eq_sigma_of_disjoint {s : set α} {t : α → set β}
(h : pairwise_on s (disjoint on t)) : (⋃i∈s, t i) ≃ (Σi:s, t i.val) :=
equiv.trans (equiv.set_congr (bUnion_eq_Union _ _)) $ Union_eq_sigma_of_disjoint $
assume ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ ne, h _ hi _ hj $ assume eq, ne $ subtype.eq eq
end set
|
0bc7c2a3ade6e84c5158660d956589a94c414120 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/algebra/char_p/algebra.lean | 1e7990ab1927b450db71ea881d32c4967720a5de | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,678 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jon Eugster. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jon Eugster, Eric Wieser
-/
import algebra.char_p.basic
import ring_theory.localization.fraction_ring
import algebra.free_algebra
/-!
# Characteristics of algebras
In this file we describe the characteristic of `R`-algebras.
In particular we are interested in the characteristic of free algebras over `R`
and the fraction field `fraction_ring R`.
## Main results
- `char_p_of_injective_algebra_map` If `R →+* A` is an injective algebra map
then `A` has the same characteristic as `R`.
Instances constructed from this result:
- Any `free_algebra R X` has the same characteristic as `R`.
- The `fraction_ring R` of an integral domain `R` has the same characteristic as `R`.
-/
/-- If the algebra map `R →+* A` is injective then `A` has the same characteristic as `R`. -/
lemma char_p_of_injective_algebra_map {R A : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(h : function.injective (algebra_map R A)) (p : ℕ) [char_p R p] : char_p A p :=
{ cast_eq_zero_iff := λx,
begin
rw ←char_p.cast_eq_zero_iff R p x,
change algebra_map ℕ A x = 0 ↔ algebra_map ℕ R x = 0,
rw is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply ℕ R A x,
refine iff.trans _ h.eq_iff,
rw ring_hom.map_zero,
end }
/-- If the algebra map `R →+* A` is injective and `R` has characteristic zero then so does `A`. -/
lemma char_zero_of_injective_algebra_map {R A : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
(h : function.injective (algebra_map R A)) [char_zero R] : char_zero A :=
{ cast_injective := λ x y hxy,
begin
change algebra_map ℕ A x = algebra_map ℕ A y at hxy,
rw is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply ℕ R A x at hxy,
rw is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply ℕ R A y at hxy,
exact char_zero.cast_injective (h hxy),
end }
-- `char_p.char_p_to_char_zero A _ (char_p_of_injective_algebra_map h 0)` does not work
-- here as it would require `ring A`.
section
variables (K L : Type*) [field K] [comm_semiring L] [nontrivial L] [algebra K L]
lemma algebra.char_p_iff (p : ℕ) : char_p K p ↔ char_p L p :=
(algebra_map K L).char_p_iff_char_p p
end
namespace free_algebra
variables {R X : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (p : ℕ)
/-- If `R` has characteristic `p`, then so does `free_algebra R X`. -/
instance char_p [char_p R p] : char_p (free_algebra R X) p :=
char_p_of_injective_algebra_map free_algebra.algebra_map_left_inverse.injective p
/-- If `R` has characteristic `0`, then so does `free_algebra R X`. -/
instance char_zero [char_zero R] : char_zero (free_algebra R X) :=
char_zero_of_injective_algebra_map free_algebra.algebra_map_left_inverse.injective
end free_algebra
namespace is_fraction_ring
variables (R : Type*) {K : Type*} [comm_ring R]
[field K] [algebra R K] [is_fraction_ring R K]
variables (p : ℕ)
/-- If `R` has characteristic `p`, then so does Frac(R). -/
lemma char_p_of_is_fraction_ring [char_p R p] : char_p K p :=
char_p_of_injective_algebra_map (is_fraction_ring.injective R K) p
/-- If `R` has characteristic `0`, then so does Frac(R). -/
lemma char_zero_of_is_fraction_ring [char_zero R] : char_zero K :=
@char_p.char_p_to_char_zero K _ _ (char_p_of_is_fraction_ring R 0)
variables [is_domain R]
/-- If `R` has characteristic `p`, then so does `fraction_ring R`. -/
instance char_p [char_p R p] : char_p (fraction_ring R) p :=
char_p_of_is_fraction_ring R p
/-- If `R` has characteristic `0`, then so does `fraction_ring R`. -/
instance char_zero [char_zero R] : char_zero (fraction_ring R) :=
char_zero_of_is_fraction_ring R
end is_fraction_ring
|
7ee53c12559fa55e84b5fb8c90cf79d9ced6a437 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/topology/algebra/uniform_ring.lean | cf0cee58ac97392b58caffbf2288ae385fa70adf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,554 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import topology.algebra.group_completion
import topology.algebra.ring
/-!
# Completion of topological rings:
This files endows the completion of a topological ring with a ring structure.
More precisely the instance `uniform_space.completion.ring` builds a ring structure
on the completion of a ring endowed with a compatible uniform structure in the sense of
`uniform_add_group`. There is also a commutative version when the original ring is commutative.
The last part of the file builds a ring structure on the biggest separated quotient of a ring.
## Main declarations:
Beyond the instances explained above (that don't have to be explicitly invoked),
the main constructions deal with continuous ring morphisms.
* `uniform_space.completion.extension_hom`: extends a continuous ring morphism from `R`
to a complete separated group `S` to `completion R`.
* `uniform_space.completion.map_ring_hom` : promotes a continuous ring morphism
from `R` to `S` into a continuous ring morphism from `completion R` to `completion S`.
-/
open classical set filter topological_space add_comm_group
open_locale classical
noncomputable theory
universes u
namespace uniform_space.completion
open dense_inducing uniform_space function
variables (α : Type*) [ring α] [uniform_space α]
instance : has_one (completion α) := ⟨(1:α)⟩
instance : has_mul (completion α) :=
⟨curry $ (dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend (coe ∘ uncurry (*))⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : α) : completion α) = 1 := rfl
variables {α} [topological_ring α]
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_mul (a b : α) : ((a * b : α) : completion α) = a * b :=
((dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend_eq
((continuous_coe α).comp (@continuous_mul α _ _ _)) (a, b)).symm
variables [uniform_add_group α]
lemma continuous_mul : continuous (λ p : completion α × completion α, p.1 * p.2) :=
begin
let m := (add_monoid_hom.mul : α →+ α →+ α).compr₂ to_compl,
have : continuous (λ p : α × α, m p.1 p.2),
from (continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul,
have di : dense_inducing (to_compl : α → completion α),
from dense_inducing_coe,
convert di.extend_Z_bilin di this,
ext ⟨x, y⟩,
refl
end
lemma continuous.mul {β : Type*} [topological_space β] {f g : β → completion α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, f b * g b) :=
continuous_mul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg : _)
instance : ring (completion α) :=
{ one_mul := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous.mul continuous_const continuous_id) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, one_mul]),
mul_one := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous.mul continuous_id continuous_const) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, mul_one]),
mul_assoc := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul (continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul continuous_fst
(continuous.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_assoc]),
left_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous.add
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)))
(continuous.add
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, mul_add]),
right_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul (continuous.add continuous_fst
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.add
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, add_mul]),
..completion.add_comm_group, ..completion.has_mul α, ..completion.has_one α }
/-- The map from a uniform ring to its completion, as a ring homomorphism. -/
def coe_ring_hom : α →+* completion α :=
⟨coe, coe_one α, assume a b, coe_mul a b, coe_zero, assume a b, coe_add a b⟩
lemma continuous_coe_ring_hom : continuous (coe_ring_hom : α → completion α) :=
continuous_coe α
variables {β : Type u} [uniform_space β] [ring β] [uniform_add_group β] [topological_ring β]
(f : α →+* β) (hf : continuous f)
/-- The completion extension as a ring morphism. -/
def extension_hom [complete_space β] [separated_space β] :
completion α →+* β :=
have hf' : continuous (f : α →+ β), from hf, -- helping the elaborator
have hf : uniform_continuous f, from uniform_continuous_add_monoid_hom_of_continuous hf',
{ to_fun := completion.extension f,
map_zero' := by rw [← coe_zero, extension_coe hf, f.map_zero],
map_add' := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_add)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).add
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_add, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf,
f.map_add]),
map_one' := by rw [← coe_one, extension_coe hf, f.map_one],
map_mul' := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_mul)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_mul, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, f.map_mul]) }
instance top_ring_compl : topological_ring (completion α) :=
{ continuous_add := continuous_add,
continuous_mul := continuous_mul }
/-- The completion map as a ring morphism. -/
def map_ring_hom (hf : continuous f) : completion α →+* completion β :=
extension_hom (coe_ring_hom.comp f) (continuous_coe_ring_hom.comp hf)
variables (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] [uniform_space R] [uniform_add_group R] [topological_ring R]
instance : comm_ring (completion R) :=
{ mul_comm := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq (continuous_fst.mul continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.mul continuous_fst))
(assume a b, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_comm]),
..completion.ring }
end uniform_space.completion
namespace uniform_space
variables {α : Type*}
lemma ring_sep_rel (α) [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
separation_setoid α = submodule.quotient_rel (ideal.closure ⊥) :=
setoid.ext $ assume x y, add_group_separation_rel x y
lemma ring_sep_quot
(α : Type u) [r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) = (α ⧸ (⊥ : ideal α).closure) :=
by rw [@ring_sep_rel α r]; refl
/-- Given a topological ring `α` equipped with a uniform structure that makes subtraction uniformly
continuous, get an equivalence between the separated quotient of `α` and the quotient ring
corresponding to the closure of zero. -/
def sep_quot_equiv_ring_quot (α)
[r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) ≃ (α ⧸ (⊥ : ideal α).closure) :=
quotient.congr_right $ assume x y, add_group_separation_rel x y
/- TODO: use a form of transport a.k.a. lift definition a.k.a. transfer -/
instance comm_ring [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
comm_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
by rw ring_sep_quot α; apply_instance
instance topological_ring
[comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
topological_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
begin
convert topological_ring_quotient (⊥ : ideal α).closure; try {apply ring_sep_rel},
simp [uniform_space.comm_ring]
end
end uniform_space
|
39dbe22ee34a33d3ae408b8bac8d21582804d5e1 | 7571914d3f4d9677288f35ab1a53a2ad70a62bd7 | /library/init/logic.lean | 2d05c6f4ccfc82f69b88552d8fbc36ec06289d9f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | picrin/lean-1 | a395fed5287995f09a15a190bb24609919a0727f | b50597228b42a7eaa01bf8cb7a4fb1a98e7a8aab | refs/heads/master | 1,610,757,735,162 | 1,502,008,413,000 | 1,502,008,413,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 38,168 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Floris van Doorn
-/
prelude
import init.core
universes u v w
@[inline] def id {α : Sort u} (a : α) : α := a
def flip {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {φ : Sort w} (f : α → β → φ) : β → α → φ :=
λ b a, f a b
/- implication -/
def implies (a b : Prop) := a → b
@[trans] lemma implies.trans {p q r : Prop} (h₁ : implies p q) (h₂ : implies q r) : implies p r :=
assume hp, h₂ (h₁ hp)
def trivial : true := ⟨⟩
@[inline] def absurd {a : Prop} {b : Sort v} (h₁ : a) (h₂ : ¬a) : b :=
false.rec b (h₂ h₁)
lemma not.intro {a : Prop} (h : a → false) : ¬ a :=
h
lemma mt {a b : Prop} (h₁ : a → b) (h₂ : ¬b) : ¬a := assume ha : a, h₂ (h₁ ha)
/- not -/
lemma not_false : ¬false := id
def non_contradictory (a : Prop) : Prop := ¬¬a
lemma non_contradictory_intro {a : Prop} (ha : a) : ¬¬a :=
assume hna : ¬a, absurd ha hna
/- false -/
lemma false.elim {c : Prop} (h : false) : c :=
false.rec c h
/- eq -/
-- proof irrelevance is built in
lemma proof_irrel {a : Prop} (h₁ h₂ : a) : h₁ = h₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma id.def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
@[inline] def eq.mp {α β : Sort u} : (α = β) → α → β :=
eq.rec_on
@[inline] def eq.mpr {α β : Sort u} : (α = β) → β → α :=
λ h₁ h₂, eq.rec_on (eq.symm h₁) h₂
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma eq.substr {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {a b : α} (h₁ : b = a) : p a → p b :=
eq.subst (eq.symm h₁)
lemma congr {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : a₁ = a₂) : f₁ a₁ = f₂ a₂ :=
eq.subst h₁ (eq.subst h₂ rfl)
lemma congr_fun {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {f g : Π x, β x} (h : f = g) (a : α) : f a = g a :=
eq.subst h (eq.refl (f a))
lemma congr_arg {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {a₁ a₂ : α} (f : α → β) : a₁ = a₂ → f a₁ = f a₂ :=
congr rfl
lemma trans_rel_left {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (r : α → α → Prop) (h₁ : r a b) (h₂ : b = c) : r a c :=
h₂ ▸ h₁
lemma trans_rel_right {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (r : α → α → Prop) (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : r b c) : r a c :=
h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma of_eq_true {p : Prop} (h : p = true) : p :=
h.symm ▸ trivial
lemma not_of_eq_false {p : Prop} (h : p = false) : ¬p :=
assume hp, h ▸ hp
@[inline] def cast {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (a : α) : β :=
eq.rec a h
lemma cast_proof_irrel {α β : Sort u} (h₁ h₂ : α = β) (a : α) : cast h₁ a = cast h₂ a := rfl
lemma cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a := rfl
/- ne -/
@[reducible] def ne {α : Sort u} (a b : α) := ¬(a = b)
notation a ≠ b := ne a b
@[simp] lemma ne.def {α : Sort u} (a b : α) : a ≠ b = ¬ (a = b) := rfl
namespace ne
variable {α : Sort u}
variables {a b : α}
lemma intro (h : a = b → false) : a ≠ b := h
lemma elim (h : a ≠ b) : a = b → false := h
lemma irrefl (h : a ≠ a) : false := h rfl
lemma symm (h : a ≠ b) : b ≠ a :=
assume (h₁ : b = a), h (h₁.symm)
end ne
lemma false_of_ne {α : Sort u} {a : α} : a ≠ a → false := ne.irrefl
section
variables {p : Prop}
lemma ne_false_of_self : p → p ≠ false :=
assume (hp : p) (heq : p = false), heq ▸ hp
lemma ne_true_of_not : ¬p → p ≠ true :=
assume (hnp : ¬p) (heq : p = true), (heq ▸ hnp) trivial
lemma true_ne_false : ¬true = false :=
ne_false_of_self trivial
end
attribute [refl] heq.refl
section
variables {α β φ : Sort u} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : φ}
lemma heq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α → Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : a == b)
: p a → p b := eq.rec_on (eq_of_heq h₁)
lemma heq.subst {p : ∀ T : Sort u, T → Prop} : a == b → p α a → p β b :=
heq.rec_on
@[symm] lemma heq.symm (h : a == b) : b == a :=
heq.rec_on h (heq.refl a)
lemma heq_of_eq (h : a = a') : a == a' :=
eq.subst h (heq.refl a)
@[trans] lemma heq.trans (h₁ : a == b) (h₂ : b == c) : a == c :=
heq.subst h₂ h₁
@[trans] lemma heq_of_heq_of_eq (h₁ : a == b) (h₂ : b = b') : a == b' :=
heq.trans h₁ (heq_of_eq h₂)
@[trans] lemma heq_of_eq_of_heq (h₁ : a = a') (h₂ : a' == b) : a == b :=
heq.trans (heq_of_eq h₁) h₂
def type_eq_of_heq (h : a == b) : α = β :=
heq.rec_on h (eq.refl α)
end
lemma eq_rec_heq {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} (h : a = a') (p : φ a), (eq.rec_on h p : φ a') == p
| a ._ rfl p := heq.refl p
lemma heq_of_eq_rec_left {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} {p₁ : φ a} {p₂ : φ a'} (e : a = a') (h₂ : (eq.rec_on e p₁ : φ a') = p₂), p₁ == p₂
| a ._ p₁ p₂ (eq.refl ._) h := eq.rec_on h (heq.refl p₁)
lemma heq_of_eq_rec_right {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} {p₁ : φ a} {p₂ : φ a'} (e : a' = a) (h₂ : p₁ = eq.rec_on e p₂), p₁ == p₂
| a ._ p₁ p₂ (eq.refl ._) h :=
have p₁ = p₂, from h,
this ▸ heq.refl p₁
lemma of_heq_true {a : Prop} (h : a == true) : a :=
of_eq_true (eq_of_heq h)
lemma eq_rec_compose : ∀ {α β φ : Sort u} (p₁ : β = φ) (p₂ : α = β) (a : α), (eq.rec_on p₁ (eq.rec_on p₂ a : β) : φ) = eq.rec_on (eq.trans p₂ p₁) a
| α ._ ._ (eq.refl ._) (eq.refl ._) a := rfl
lemma eq_rec_eq_eq_rec : ∀ {α₁ α₂ : Sort u} {p : α₁ = α₂} {a₁ : α₁} {a₂ : α₂}, (eq.rec_on p a₁ : α₂) = a₂ → a₁ = eq.rec_on (eq.symm p) a₂
| α ._ rfl a ._ rfl := rfl
lemma eq_rec_of_heq_left : ∀ {α₁ α₂ : Sort u} {a₁ : α₁} {a₂ : α₂} (h : a₁ == a₂), (eq.rec_on (type_eq_of_heq h) a₁ : α₂) = a₂
| α ._ a ._ (heq.refl ._) := rfl
lemma eq_rec_of_heq_right {α₁ α₂ : Sort u} {a₁ : α₁} {a₂ : α₂} (h : a₁ == a₂) : a₁ = eq.rec_on (eq.symm (type_eq_of_heq h)) a₂ :=
eq_rec_eq_eq_rec (eq_rec_of_heq_left h)
lemma cast_heq : ∀ {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (a : α), cast h a == a
| α ._ (eq.refl ._) a := heq.refl a
/- and -/
notation a /\ b := and a b
notation a ∧ b := and a b
variables {a b c d : Prop}
lemma and.elim (h₁ : a ∧ b) (h₂ : a → b → c) : c :=
and.rec h₂ h₁
lemma and.swap : a ∧ b → b ∧ a :=
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨hb, ha⟩
def and.symm := @and.swap
/- or -/
notation a \/ b := or a b
notation a ∨ b := or a b
namespace or
lemma elim (h₁ : a ∨ b) (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → c) : c :=
or.rec h₂ h₃ h₁
end or
lemma non_contradictory_em (a : Prop) : ¬¬(a ∨ ¬a) :=
assume not_em : ¬(a ∨ ¬a),
have neg_a : ¬a, from
assume pos_a : a, absurd (or.inl pos_a) not_em,
absurd (or.inr neg_a) not_em
def not_not_em := non_contradictory_em
lemma or.swap : a ∨ b → b ∨ a := or.rec or.inr or.inl
def or.symm := @or.swap
/- xor -/
def xor (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬ b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬ a)
/- iff -/
structure iff (a b : Prop) : Prop :=
intro :: (mp : a → b) (mpr : b → a)
notation a <-> b := iff a b
notation a ↔ b := iff a b
lemma iff.elim : ((a → b) → (b → a) → c) → (a ↔ b) → c := iff.rec
attribute [recursor 5] iff.elim
lemma iff.elim_left : (a ↔ b) → a → b := iff.mp
lemma iff.elim_right : (a ↔ b) → b → a := iff.mpr
lemma iff_iff_implies_and_implies (a b : Prop) : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (b → a) :=
iff.intro (λ h, and.intro h.mp h.mpr) (λ h, iff.intro h.left h.right)
@[refl]
lemma iff.refl (a : Prop) : a ↔ a :=
iff.intro (assume h, h) (assume h, h)
lemma iff.rfl {a : Prop} : a ↔ a :=
iff.refl a
@[trans]
lemma iff.trans (h₁ : a ↔ b) (h₂ : b ↔ c) : a ↔ c :=
iff.intro
(assume ha, iff.mp h₂ (iff.mp h₁ ha))
(assume hc, iff.mpr h₁ (iff.mpr h₂ hc))
@[symm]
lemma iff.symm (h : a ↔ b) : b ↔ a :=
iff.intro (iff.elim_right h) (iff.elim_left h)
lemma iff.comm : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b ↔ a) :=
iff.intro iff.symm iff.symm
lemma eq.to_iff {a b : Prop} (h : a = b) : a ↔ b :=
eq.rec_on h iff.rfl
lemma neq_of_not_iff {a b : Prop} : ¬(a ↔ b) → a ≠ b :=
λ h₁ h₂,
have a ↔ b, from eq.subst h₂ (iff.refl a),
absurd this h₁
lemma not_iff_not_of_iff (h₁ : a ↔ b) : ¬a ↔ ¬b :=
iff.intro
(assume (hna : ¬ a) (hb : b), hna (iff.elim_right h₁ hb))
(assume (hnb : ¬ b) (ha : a), hnb (iff.elim_left h₁ ha))
lemma of_iff_true (h : a ↔ true) : a :=
iff.mp (iff.symm h) trivial
lemma not_of_iff_false : (a ↔ false) → ¬a := iff.mp
lemma iff_true_intro (h : a) : a ↔ true :=
iff.intro
(λ hl, trivial)
(λ hr, h)
lemma iff_false_intro (h : ¬a) : a ↔ false :=
iff.intro h (false.rec a)
lemma not_non_contradictory_iff_absurd (a : Prop) : ¬¬¬a ↔ ¬a :=
iff.intro
(λ (hl : ¬¬¬a) (ha : a), hl (non_contradictory_intro ha))
absurd
def not_not_not_iff := not_non_contradictory_iff_absurd
lemma imp_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a → b) ↔ (c → d) :=
iff.intro
(λ hab hc, iff.mp h₂ (hab (iff.mpr h₁ hc)))
(λ hcd ha, iff.mpr h₂ (hcd (iff.mp h₁ ha)))
lemma imp_congr_ctx (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : c → (b ↔ d)) : (a → b) ↔ (c → d) :=
iff.intro
(λ hab hc, have ha : a, from iff.mpr h₁ hc,
have hb : b, from hab ha,
iff.mp (h₂ hc) hb)
(λ hcd ha, have hc : c, from iff.mp h₁ ha,
have hd : d, from hcd hc,
iff.mpr (h₂ hc) hd)
lemma imp_congr_right (h : a → (b ↔ c)) : (a → b) ↔ (a → c) :=
iff.intro
(assume hab ha, iff.elim_left (h ha) (hab ha))
(assume hab ha, iff.elim_right (h ha) (hab ha))
lemma not_not_intro (ha : a) : ¬¬a :=
assume hna : ¬a, hna ha
lemma not_of_not_not_not (h : ¬¬¬a) : ¬a :=
λ ha, absurd (not_not_intro ha) h
@[simp] lemma not_true : (¬ true) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (not_not_intro trivial)
def not_true_iff := not_true
@[simp] lemma not_false_iff : (¬ false) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro not_false
@[congr] lemma not_congr (h : a ↔ b) : ¬a ↔ ¬b :=
iff.intro (λ h₁ h₂, h₁ (iff.mpr h h₂)) (λ h₁ h₂, h₁ (iff.mp h h₂))
@[simp] lemma ne_self_iff_false {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (not (a = a)) ↔ false :=
iff.intro false_of_ne false.elim
@[simp] lemma eq_self_iff_true {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (a = a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro rfl
@[simp] lemma heq_self_iff_true {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (a == a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (heq.refl a)
@[simp] lemma iff_not_self (a : Prop) : (a ↔ ¬a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h,
have h' : ¬a, from (λ ha, (iff.mp h ha) ha),
h' (iff.mpr h h'))
@[simp] lemma not_iff_self (a : Prop) : (¬a ↔ a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h,
have h' : ¬a, from (λ ha, (iff.mpr h ha) ha),
h' (iff.mp h h'))
@[simp] lemma true_iff_false : (true ↔ false) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, iff.mp h trivial)
@[simp] lemma false_iff_true : (false ↔ true) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, iff.mpr h trivial)
lemma false_of_true_iff_false : (true ↔ false) → false :=
assume h, iff.mp h trivial
lemma false_of_true_eq_false : (true = false) → false :=
assume h, h ▸ trivial
lemma true_eq_false_of_false : false → (true = false) :=
false.elim
lemma eq_comm {α : Sort u} {a b : α} : a = b ↔ b = a :=
⟨eq.symm, eq.symm⟩
/- and simp rules -/
lemma and.imp (hac : a → c) (hbd : b → d) : a ∧ b → c ∧ d :=
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨hac ha, hbd hb⟩
def and_implies := @and.imp
@[congr] lemma and_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ∧ b) ↔ (c ∧ d) :=
iff.intro (and.imp (iff.mp h₁) (iff.mp h₂)) (and.imp (iff.mpr h₁) (iff.mpr h₂))
lemma and_congr_right (h : a → (b ↔ c)) : (a ∧ b) ↔ (a ∧ c) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨ha, iff.elim_left (h ha) hb⟩)
(assume ⟨ha, hc⟩, ⟨ha, iff.elim_right (h ha) hc⟩)
@[simp] lemma and.comm : a ∧ b ↔ b ∧ a :=
iff.intro and.swap and.swap
lemma and_comm (a b : Prop) : a ∧ b ↔ b ∧ a := and.comm
@[simp] lemma and.assoc : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ a ∧ (b ∧ c) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨⟨ha, hb⟩, hc⟩, ⟨ha, ⟨hb, hc⟩⟩)
(assume ⟨ha, ⟨hb, hc⟩⟩, ⟨⟨ha, hb⟩, hc⟩)
lemma and_assoc (a b : Prop) : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ a ∧ (b ∧ c) := and.assoc
@[simp] lemma and.left_comm : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ↔ b ∧ (a ∧ c) :=
iff.trans (iff.symm and.assoc) (iff.trans (and_congr and.comm (iff.refl c)) and.assoc)
lemma and_iff_left {a b : Prop} (hb : b) : (a ∧ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (λ ha, ⟨ha, hb⟩)
lemma and_iff_right {a b : Prop} (ha : a) : (a ∧ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro and.right (and.intro ha)
@[simp] lemma and_true (a : Prop) : a ∧ true ↔ a :=
and_iff_left trivial
@[simp] lemma true_and (a : Prop) : true ∧ a ↔ a :=
and_iff_right trivial
@[simp] lemma and_false (a : Prop) : a ∧ false ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro and.right
@[simp] lemma false_and (a : Prop) : false ∧ a ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro and.left
@[simp] lemma not_and_self (a : Prop) : (¬a ∧ a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, and.elim h (λ h₁ h₂, absurd h₂ h₁))
@[simp] lemma and_not_self (a : Prop) : (a ∧ ¬a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, absurd h₁ h₂)
@[simp] lemma and_self (a : Prop) : a ∧ a ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (assume h, ⟨h, h⟩)
/- or simp rules -/
lemma or.imp (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → d) : a ∨ b → c ∨ d :=
or.rec (λ h, or.inl (h₂ h)) (λ h, or.inr (h₃ h))
lemma or.imp_left (h : a → b) : a ∨ c → b ∨ c :=
or.imp h id
lemma or.imp_right (h : a → b) : c ∨ a → c ∨ b :=
or.imp id h
@[congr] lemma or_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ∨ b) ↔ (c ∨ d) :=
iff.intro (or.imp (iff.mp h₁) (iff.mp h₂)) (or.imp (iff.mpr h₁) (iff.mpr h₂))
@[simp] lemma or.comm : a ∨ b ↔ b ∨ a := iff.intro or.swap or.swap
lemma or_comm (a b : Prop) : a ∨ b ↔ b ∨ a := or.comm
@[simp] lemma or.assoc : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ a ∨ (b ∨ c) :=
iff.intro
(or.rec (or.imp_right or.inl) (λ h, or.inr (or.inr h)))
(or.rec (λ h, or.inl (or.inl h)) (or.imp_left or.inr))
lemma or_assoc (a b : Prop) : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ a ∨ (b ∨ c) :=
or.assoc
@[simp] lemma or.left_comm : a ∨ (b ∨ c) ↔ b ∨ (a ∨ c) :=
iff.trans (iff.symm or.assoc) (iff.trans (or_congr or.comm (iff.refl c)) or.assoc)
theorem or_iff_right_of_imp (ha : a → b) : (a ∨ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro (or.rec ha id) or.inr
theorem or_iff_left_of_imp (hb : b → a) : (a ∨ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro (or.rec id hb) or.inl
@[simp] lemma or_true (a : Prop) : a ∨ true ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (or.inr trivial)
@[simp] lemma true_or (a : Prop) : true ∨ a ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (or.inl trivial)
@[simp] lemma or_false (a : Prop) : a ∨ false ↔ a :=
iff.intro (or.rec id false.elim) or.inl
@[simp] lemma false_or (a : Prop) : false ∨ a ↔ a :=
iff.trans or.comm (or_false a)
@[simp] lemma or_self (a : Prop) : a ∨ a ↔ a :=
iff.intro (or.rec id id) or.inl
lemma not_or {a b : Prop} : ¬ a → ¬ b → ¬ (a ∨ b)
| hna hnb (or.inl ha) := absurd ha hna
| hna hnb (or.inr hb) := absurd hb hnb
/- or resolution rulse -/
def or.resolve_left {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ b) (na : ¬ a) : b :=
or.elim h (λ ha, absurd ha na) id
def or.neg_resolve_left {a b : Prop} (h : ¬ a ∨ b) (ha : a) : b :=
or.elim h (λ na, absurd ha na) id
def or.resolve_right {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ b) (nb : ¬ b) : a :=
or.elim h id (λ hb, absurd hb nb)
def or.neg_resolve_right {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ ¬ b) (hb : b) : a :=
or.elim h id (λ nb, absurd hb nb)
/- iff simp rules -/
@[simp] lemma iff_true (a : Prop) : (a ↔ true) ↔ a :=
iff.intro (assume h, iff.mpr h trivial) iff_true_intro
@[simp] lemma true_iff (a : Prop) : (true ↔ a) ↔ a :=
iff.trans iff.comm (iff_true a)
@[simp] lemma iff_false (a : Prop) : (a ↔ false) ↔ ¬ a :=
iff.intro iff.mp iff_false_intro
@[simp] lemma false_iff (a : Prop) : (false ↔ a) ↔ ¬ a :=
iff.trans iff.comm (iff_false a)
@[simp] lemma iff_self (a : Prop) : (a ↔ a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro iff.rfl
@[congr] lemma iff_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ↔ b) ↔ (c ↔ d) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies a b).trans
((and_congr (imp_congr h₁ h₂) (imp_congr h₂ h₁)).trans
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies c d).symm)
/- implies simp rule -/
@[simp] lemma implies_true_iff (α : Sort u) : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ ha h, trivial)
@[simp] lemma false_implies_iff (a : Prop) : (false → a) ↔ true :=
iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ ha h, false.elim h)
@[simp] theorem true_implies_iff (α : Prop) : (true → α) ↔ α :=
iff.intro (λ h, h trivial) (λ h h', h)
/- exists -/
inductive Exists {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) : Prop
| intro : ∀ (a : α), p a → Exists
attribute [intro] Exists.intro
@[pattern]
def exists.intro := @Exists.intro
notation `exists` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, Exists P) := r
notation `∃` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, Exists P) := r
lemma exists.elim {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
(h₁ : ∃ x, p x) (h₂ : ∀ (a : α), p a → b) : b :=
Exists.rec h₂ h₁
/- exists unique -/
def exists_unique {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) :=
∃ x, p x ∧ ∀ y, p y → y = x
notation `∃!` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, exists_unique P) := r
@[intro]
lemma exists_unique.intro {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} (w : α) (h₁ : p w) (h₂ : ∀ y, p y → y = w) :
∃! x, p x :=
exists.intro w ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
attribute [recursor 4]
lemma exists_unique.elim {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
(h₂ : ∃! x, p x) (h₁ : ∀ x, p x → (∀ y, p y → y = x) → b) : b :=
exists.elim h₂ (λ w hw, h₁ w (and.left hw) (and.right hw))
lemma exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop}
(hex : ∃ x, p x) (hunique : ∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ → p y₂ → y₁ = y₂) : ∃! x, p x :=
exists.elim hex (λ x px, exists_unique.intro x px (assume y, assume : p y, hunique y x this px))
lemma exists_of_exists_unique {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃! x, p x) : ∃ x, p x :=
exists.elim h (λ x hx, ⟨x, and.left hx⟩)
lemma unique_of_exists_unique {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∃! x, p x) {y₁ y₂ : α} (py₁ : p y₁) (py₂ : p y₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
exists_unique.elim h
(assume x, assume : p x,
assume unique : ∀ y, p y → y = x,
show y₁ = y₂, from eq.trans (unique _ py₁) (eq.symm (unique _ py₂)))
/- exists, forall, exists unique congruences -/
@[congr] lemma forall_congr {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a ↔ q a)) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, q a :=
iff.intro (λ p a, iff.mp (h a) (p a)) (λ q a, iff.mpr (h a) (q a))
lemma exists_imp_exists {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a → q a)) (p : ∃ a, p a) : ∃ a, q a :=
exists.elim p (λ a hp, ⟨a, h a hp⟩)
@[congr] lemma exists_congr {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a ↔ q a)) : (Exists p) ↔ ∃ a, q a :=
iff.intro
(exists_imp_exists (λ a, iff.mp (h a)))
(exists_imp_exists (λ a, iff.mpr (h a)))
@[congr] lemma exists_unique_congr {α : Sort u} {p₁ p₂ : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p₁ x ↔ p₂ x) : (exists_unique p₁) ↔ (∃! x, p₂ x) := --
exists_congr (λ x, and_congr (h x) (forall_congr (λ y, imp_congr (h y) iff.rfl)))
lemma forall_not_of_not_exists {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : ¬(∃ x, p x) → (∀ x, ¬p x) :=
λ hne x hp, hne ⟨x, hp⟩
/- decidable -/
def decidable.to_bool (p : Prop) [h : decidable p] : bool :=
decidable.cases_on h (λ h₁, bool.ff) (λ h₂, bool.tt)
export decidable (is_true is_false to_bool)
instance decidable.true : decidable true :=
is_true trivial
instance decidable.false : decidable false :=
is_false not_false
-- We use "dependent" if-then-else to be able to communicate the if-then-else condition
-- to the branches
@[inline] def dite (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} : (c → α) → (¬ c → α) → α :=
λ t e, decidable.rec_on h e t
/- if-then-else -/
@[inline] def ite (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t e : α) : α :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ hnc, e) (λ hc, t)
namespace decidable
variables {p q : Prop}
def rec_on_true [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u} (h₃ : p) (h₄ : h₁ h₃)
: decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁ :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ h, false.rec _ (h h₃)) (λ h, h₄)
def rec_on_false [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u} (h₃ : ¬p) (h₄ : h₂ h₃)
: decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁ :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ h, h₄) (λ h, false.rec _ (h₃ h))
def by_cases {q : Sort u} [φ : decidable p] : (p → q) → (¬p → q) → q := dite _
lemma em (p : Prop) [decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p := by_cases or.inl or.inr
lemma by_contradiction [decidable p] (h : ¬p → false) : p :=
if h₁ : p then h₁ else false.rec _ (h h₁)
end decidable
section
variables {p q : Prop}
def decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (hp : decidable p) (h : p ↔ q) : decidable q :=
if hp : p then is_true (iff.mp h hp)
else is_false (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h) hp)
def decidable_of_decidable_of_eq (hp : decidable p) (h : p = q) : decidable q :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff hp h.to_iff
protected def or.by_cases [decidable p] [decidable q] {α : Sort u}
(h : p ∨ q) (h₁ : p → α) (h₂ : q → α) : α :=
if hp : p then h₁ hp else
if hq : q then h₂ hq else
false.rec _ (or.elim h hp hq)
end
section
variables {p q : Prop}
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ∧ q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_true ⟨hp, hq⟩
else is_false (assume h : p ∧ q, hq (and.right h))
else is_false (assume h : p ∧ q, hp (and.left h))
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ∨ q) :=
if hp : p then is_true (or.inl hp) else
if hq : q then is_true (or.inr hq) else
is_false (or.rec hp hq)
instance [decidable p] : decidable (¬p) :=
if hp : p then is_false (absurd hp) else is_true hp
instance implies.decidable [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p → q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_true (assume h, hq)
else is_false (assume h : p → q, absurd (h hp) hq)
else is_true (assume h, absurd h hp)
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ↔ q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_true ⟨λ_, hq, λ_, hp⟩
else is_false $ λh, hq (h.1 hp)
else
if hq : q then is_false $ λh, hp (h.2 hq)
else is_true $ ⟨λh, absurd h hp, λh, absurd h hq⟩
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (xor p q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_false (or.rec (λ ⟨_, h⟩, h hq : ¬(p ∧ ¬ q)) (λ ⟨_, h⟩, h hp : ¬(q ∧ ¬ p)))
else is_true $ or.inl ⟨hp, hq⟩
else
if hq : q then is_true $ or.inr ⟨hq, hp⟩
else is_false (or.rec (λ ⟨h, _⟩, hp h : ¬(p ∧ ¬ q)) (λ ⟨h, _⟩, hq h : ¬(q ∧ ¬ p)))
instance exists_prop_decidable {p} (P : p → Prop)
[Dp : decidable p] [DP : ∀ h, decidable (P h)] : decidable (∃ h, P h) :=
if h : p then decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (DP h)
⟨λ h2, ⟨h, h2⟩, λ⟨h', h2⟩, h2⟩ else is_false (mt (λ⟨h, _⟩, h) h)
instance forall_prop_decidable {p} (P : p → Prop)
[Dp : decidable p] [DP : ∀ h, decidable (P h)] : decidable (∀ h, P h) :=
if h : p then decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (DP h)
⟨λ h2 _, h2, λal, al h⟩ else is_true (λ h2, absurd h2 h)
end
instance {α : Sort u} [decidable_eq α] (a b : α) : decidable (a ≠ b) :=
implies.decidable
lemma bool.ff_ne_tt : ff = tt → false
.
def is_dec_eq {α : Sort u} (p : α → α → bool) : Prop := ∀ ⦃x y : α⦄, p x y = tt → x = y
def is_dec_refl {α : Sort u} (p : α → α → bool) : Prop := ∀ x, p x x = tt
open decidable
instance : decidable_eq bool
| ff ff := is_true rfl
| ff tt := is_false bool.ff_ne_tt
| tt ff := is_false (ne.symm bool.ff_ne_tt)
| tt tt := is_true rfl
def decidable_eq_of_bool_pred {α : Sort u} {p : α → α → bool} (h₁ : is_dec_eq p) (h₂ : is_dec_refl p) : decidable_eq α :=
assume x y : α,
if hp : p x y = tt then is_true (h₁ hp)
else is_false (assume hxy : x = y, absurd (h₂ y) (@eq.rec_on _ _ (λ z, ¬p z y = tt) _ hxy hp))
lemma decidable_eq_inl_refl {α : Sort u} [h : decidable_eq α] (a : α) : h a a = is_true (eq.refl a) :=
match (h a a) with
| (is_true e) := rfl
| (is_false n) := absurd rfl n
end
lemma decidable_eq_inr_neg {α : Sort u} [h : decidable_eq α] {a b : α} : Π n : a ≠ b, h a b = is_false n :=
assume n,
match (h a b) with
| (is_true e) := absurd e n
| (is_false n₁) := proof_irrel n n₁ ▸ eq.refl (is_false n)
end
/- inhabited -/
class inhabited (α : Sort u) :=
(default : α)
def default (α : Sort u) [inhabited α] : α :=
inhabited.default α
@[inline, irreducible] def arbitrary (α : Sort u) [inhabited α] : α :=
default α
instance prop.inhabited : inhabited Prop :=
⟨true⟩
instance fun.inhabited (α : Sort u) {β : Sort v} [h : inhabited β] : inhabited (α → β) :=
inhabited.rec_on h (λ b, ⟨λ a, b⟩)
instance pi.inhabited (α : Sort u) {β : α → Sort v} [Π x, inhabited (β x)] : inhabited (Π x, β x) :=
⟨λ a, default (β a)⟩
instance : inhabited bool := ⟨ff⟩
instance : inhabited true := ⟨trivial⟩
class inductive nonempty (α : Sort u) : Prop
| intro : α → nonempty
protected def nonempty.elim {α : Sort u} {p : Prop} (h₁ : nonempty α) (h₂ : α → p) : p :=
nonempty.rec h₂ h₁
instance nonempty_of_inhabited {α : Sort u} [inhabited α] : nonempty α :=
⟨default α⟩
lemma nonempty_of_exists {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) → nonempty α
| ⟨w, h⟩ := ⟨w⟩
/- subsingleton -/
class inductive subsingleton (α : Sort u) : Prop
| intro : (∀ a b : α, a = b) → subsingleton
protected def subsingleton.elim {α : Sort u} [h : subsingleton α] : ∀ (a b : α), a = b :=
subsingleton.rec (λ p, p) h
protected def subsingleton.helim {α β : Sort u} [h : subsingleton α] (h : α = β) : ∀ (a : α) (b : β), a == b :=
eq.rec_on h (λ a b : α, heq_of_eq (subsingleton.elim a b))
instance subsingleton_prop (p : Prop) : subsingleton p :=
⟨λ a b, proof_irrel a b⟩
instance (p : Prop) : subsingleton (decidable p) :=
subsingleton.intro (λ d₁,
match d₁ with
| (is_true t₁) := (λ d₂,
match d₂ with
| (is_true t₂) := eq.rec_on (proof_irrel t₁ t₂) rfl
| (is_false f₂) := absurd t₁ f₂
end)
| (is_false f₁) := (λ d₂,
match d₂ with
| (is_true t₂) := absurd t₂ f₁
| (is_false f₂) := eq.rec_on (proof_irrel f₁ f₂) rfl
end)
end)
protected lemma rec_subsingleton {p : Prop} [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u}
[h₃ : Π (h : p), subsingleton (h₁ h)] [h₄ : Π (h : ¬p), subsingleton (h₂ h)]
: subsingleton (decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁) :=
match h with
| (is_true h) := h₃ h
| (is_false h) := h₄ h
end
lemma if_pos {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hc : c) {α : Sort u} {t e : α} : (ite c t e) = t :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := absurd hc hnc
end
lemma if_neg {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hnc : ¬c) {α : Sort u} {t e : α} : (ite c t e) = e :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := absurd hc hnc
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
@[simp]
lemma if_t_t (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t : α) : (ite c t t) = t :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
lemma implies_of_if_pos {c t e : Prop} [decidable c] (h : ite c t e) : c → t :=
assume hc, eq.rec_on (if_pos hc : ite c t e = t) h
lemma implies_of_if_neg {c t e : Prop} [decidable c] (h : ite c t e) : ¬c → e :=
assume hnc, eq.rec_on (if_neg hnc : ite c t e = e) h
lemma if_ctx_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → x = u) (h_e : ¬c → y = v) :
ite b x y = ite c u v :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
@[congr]
lemma if_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x = u) (h_e : y = v) :
ite b x y = ite c u v :=
@if_ctx_congr α b c dec_b dec_c x y u v h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
lemma if_ctx_simp_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] {x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → x = u) (h_e : ¬c → y = v) :
ite b x y = (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) α u v) :=
@if_ctx_congr α b c dec_b (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) x y u v h_c h_t h_e
@[congr]
lemma if_simp_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] {x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x = u) (h_e : y = v) :
ite b x y = (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) α u v) :=
@if_ctx_simp_congr α b c dec_b x y u v h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
@[simp]
lemma if_true {α : Sort u} {h : decidable true} (t e : α) : (@ite true h α t e) = t :=
if_pos trivial
@[simp]
lemma if_false {α : Sort u} {h : decidable false} (t e : α) : (@ite false h α t e) = e :=
if_neg not_false
lemma if_ctx_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → (x ↔ u)) (h_e : ¬c → (y ↔ v)) :
ite b x y ↔ ite c u v :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
@[congr]
lemma if_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x ↔ u) (h_e : y ↔ v) :
ite b x y ↔ ite c u v :=
if_ctx_congr_prop h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
lemma if_ctx_simp_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → (x ↔ u)) (h_e : ¬c → (y ↔ v)) :
ite b x y ↔ (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) Prop u v) :=
@if_ctx_congr_prop b c x y u v dec_b (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) h_c h_t h_e
@[congr]
lemma if_simp_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x ↔ u) (h_e : y ↔ v) :
ite b x y ↔ (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) Prop u v) :=
@if_ctx_simp_congr_prop b c x y u v dec_b h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
@[simp] lemma dif_pos {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hc : c) {α : Sort u} {t : c → α} {e : ¬ c → α} : dite c t e = t hc :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := absurd hc hnc
end
@[simp] lemma dif_neg {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hnc : ¬c) {α : Sort u} {t : c → α} {e : ¬ c → α} : dite c t e = e hnc :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := absurd hc hnc
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
lemma dif_ctx_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x : b → α} {u : c → α} {y : ¬b → α} {v : ¬c → α}
(h_c : b ↔ c)
(h_t : ∀ (h : c), x (iff.mpr h_c h) = u h)
(h_e : ∀ (h : ¬c), y (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h) = v h) :
(@dite b dec_b α x y) = (@dite c dec_c α u v) :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
lemma dif_ctx_simp_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
{x : b → α} {u : c → α} {y : ¬b → α} {v : ¬c → α}
(h_c : b ↔ c)
(h_t : ∀ (h : c), x (iff.mpr h_c h) = u h)
(h_e : ∀ (h : ¬c), y (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h) = v h) :
(@dite b dec_b α x y) = (@dite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) α u v) :=
@dif_ctx_congr α b c dec_b (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) x u y v h_c h_t h_e
-- Remark: dite and ite are "defally equal" when we ignore the proofs.
lemma dif_eq_if (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t : α) (e : α) : dite c (λ h, t) (λ h, e) = ite c t e :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
instance {c t e : Prop} [d_c : decidable c] [d_t : decidable t] [d_e : decidable e] : decidable (if c then t else e) :=
match d_c with
| (is_true hc) := d_t
| (is_false hc) := d_e
end
instance {c : Prop} {t : c → Prop} {e : ¬c → Prop} [d_c : decidable c] [d_t : ∀ h, decidable (t h)] [d_e : ∀ h, decidable (e h)] : decidable (if h : c then t h else e h) :=
match d_c with
| (is_true hc) := d_t hc
| (is_false hc) := d_e hc
end
def as_true (c : Prop) [decidable c] : Prop :=
if c then true else false
def as_false (c : Prop) [decidable c] : Prop :=
if c then false else true
def of_as_true {c : Prop} [h₁ : decidable c] (h₂ : as_true c) : c :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| (is_true h_c), h₂ := h_c
| (is_false h_c), h₂ := false.elim h₂
end
/-- Universe lifting operation -/
structure {r s} ulift (α : Type s) : Type (max s r) :=
up :: (down : α)
namespace ulift
/- Bijection between α and ulift.{v} α -/
lemma up_down {α : Type u} : ∀ (b : ulift.{v} α), up (down b) = b
| (up a) := rfl
lemma down_up {α : Type u} (a : α) : down (up.{v} a) = a := rfl
end ulift
/-- Universe lifting operation from Sort to Type -/
structure plift (α : Sort u) : Type u :=
up :: (down : α)
namespace plift
/- Bijection between α and plift α -/
lemma up_down {α : Sort u} : ∀ (b : plift α), up (down b) = b
| (up a) := rfl
lemma down_up {α : Sort u} (a : α) : down (up a) = a := rfl
end plift
/- Equalities for rewriting let-expressions -/
lemma let_value_eq {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : α → β) :
a₁ = a₂ → (let x : α := a₁ in b x) = (let x : α := a₂ in b x) :=
λ h, eq.rec_on h rfl
lemma let_value_heq {α : Sort v} {β : α → Sort u} {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : Π x : α, β x) :
a₁ = a₂ → (let x : α := a₁ in b x) == (let x : α := a₂ in b x) :=
λ h, eq.rec_on h (heq.refl (b a₁))
lemma let_body_eq {α : Sort v} {β : α → Sort u} (a : α) {b₁ b₂ : Π x : α, β x} :
(∀ x, b₁ x = b₂ x) → (let x : α := a in b₁ x) = (let x : α := a in b₂ x) :=
λ h, h a
lemma let_eq {α : Sort v} {β : Sort u} {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : α → β} :
a₁ = a₂ → (∀ x, b₁ x = b₂ x) → (let x : α := a₁ in b₁ x) = (let x : α := a₂ in b₂ x) :=
λ h₁ h₂, eq.rec_on h₁ (h₂ a₁)
section relation
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (r : β → β → Prop)
local infix `≺`:50 := r
def reflexive := ∀ x, x ≺ x
def symmetric := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ x
def transitive := ∀ ⦃x y z⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ z → x ≺ z
def equivalence := reflexive r ∧ symmetric r ∧ transitive r
def total := ∀ x y, x ≺ y ∨ y ≺ x
def mk_equivalence (rfl : reflexive r) (symm : symmetric r) (trans : transitive r) : equivalence r :=
⟨rfl, symm, trans⟩
def irreflexive := ∀ x, ¬ x ≺ x
def anti_symmetric := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ x → x = y
def empty_relation := λ a₁ a₂ : α, false
def subrelation (q r : β → β → Prop) := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, q x y → r x y
def inv_image (f : α → β) : α → α → Prop :=
λ a₁ a₂, f a₁ ≺ f a₂
lemma inv_image.trans (f : α → β) (h : transitive r) : transitive (inv_image r f) :=
λ (a₁ a₂ a₃ : α) (h₁ : inv_image r f a₁ a₂) (h₂ : inv_image r f a₂ a₃), h h₁ h₂
lemma inv_image.irreflexive (f : α → β) (h : irreflexive r) : irreflexive (inv_image r f) :=
λ (a : α) (h₁ : inv_image r f a a), h (f a) h₁
inductive tc {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : α → α → Prop
| base : ∀ a b, r a b → tc a b
| trans : ∀ a b c, tc a b → tc b c → tc a c
end relation
section binary
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
variable f : α → α → α
variable inv : α → α
variable one : α
local notation a * b := f a b
local notation a ⁻¹ := inv a
variable g : α → α → α
local notation a + b := g a b
def commutative := ∀ a b, a * b = b * a
def associative := ∀ a b c, (a * b) * c = a * (b * c)
def left_identity := ∀ a, one * a = a
def right_identity := ∀ a, a * one = a
def right_inverse := ∀ a, a * a⁻¹ = one
def left_cancelative := ∀ a b c, a * b = a * c → b = c
def right_cancelative := ∀ a b c, a * b = c * b → a = c
def left_distributive := ∀ a b c, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
def right_distributive := ∀ a b c, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
def right_commutative (h : β → α → β) := ∀ b a₁ a₂, h (h b a₁) a₂ = h (h b a₂) a₁
def left_commutative (h : α → β → β) := ∀ a₁ a₂ b, h a₁ (h a₂ b) = h a₂ (h a₁ b)
lemma left_comm : commutative f → associative f → left_commutative f :=
assume hcomm hassoc, assume a b c, calc
a*(b*c) = (a*b)*c : eq.symm (hassoc a b c)
... = (b*a)*c : hcomm a b ▸ rfl
... = b*(a*c) : hassoc b a c
lemma right_comm : commutative f → associative f → right_commutative f :=
assume hcomm hassoc, assume a b c, calc
(a*b)*c = a*(b*c) : hassoc a b c
... = a*(c*b) : hcomm b c ▸ rfl
... = (a*c)*b : eq.symm (hassoc a c b)
end binary
|
52851137360525023f062f89ece8e0daa90139a1 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /tests/lean/typeOf.lean | 357b0caff9dc52777c9bea932ce154795d7548ee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 613 | lean | --
def f1 (x : Nat) (b : Bool) : typeOf% x :=
let r : typeOf% (x+1) := x+1;
r + 1
theorem ex1 : f1 1 true = 3 :=
rfl
def f2 (x : Nat) (b : Bool) : typeOf% x :=
let r : typeOf% b := x+1; -- error
r + 1
def f3 (x : Nat) (b : Bool) : typeOf% b :=
let r (x!1 : typeOf% x) : typeOf% b := x > 1;
r x
def f4 (x : Nat) : Nat :=
let y : Nat := x
let y := ensureTypeOf% y "invalid reassignment, term" y == 1 -- error
y + 1
def f5 (x : Nat) : Nat :=
let y : Nat := x
let y := ensureTypeOf% y "invalid reassignment, term" (y+1)
y + 1
def f6 (x : Nat) : Nat :=
ensureExpectedType% "natural number expected, value" true
|
61b09f7be3793c73018c70cefd78aec51b1efc48 | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /src/Lean/Data/OpenDecl.lean | 77a03a822590c7e03653300a3d5fce393454c7bb | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 764 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.Name
namespace Lean
inductive OpenDecl where
| simple (ns : Name) (except : List Name)
| explicit (id : Name) (declName : Name)
namespace OpenDecl
instance : Inhabited OpenDecl := ⟨simple Name.anonymous []⟩
instance : ToString OpenDecl := ⟨fun decl =>
match decl with
| explicit id decl => toString id ++ " → " ++ toString decl
| simple ns ex => toString ns ++ (if ex == [] then "" else " hiding " ++ toString ex)⟩
end OpenDecl
def rootNamespace := `_root_
def removeRoot (n : Name) : Name :=
n.replacePrefix rootNamespace Name.anonymous
end Lean
|
7cd1ec7b945975e20b143e4a614cb460532e1557 | aa2345b30d710f7e75f13157a35845ee6d48c017 | /category_theory/isomorphism.lean | f0f27c6d3952bfb201b873a591288eb368760b59 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | CohenCyril/mathlib | 5241b20a3fd0ac0133e48e618a5fb7761ca7dcbe | a12d5a192f5923016752f638d19fc1a51610f163 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,031,957,957 | 1,541,432,824,000 | 1,541,432,824,000 | 156,246,337 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,541,434,514,000 | 1,541,434,513,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,949 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
import category_theory.functor
universes u v
namespace category_theory
structure iso {C : Type u} [category.{u v} C] (X Y : C) :=
(hom : X ⟶ Y)
(inv : Y ⟶ X)
(hom_inv_id' : hom ≫ inv = 𝟙 X . obviously)
(inv_hom_id' : inv ≫ hom = 𝟙 Y . obviously)
-- We restate the hom_inv_id' and inv_hom_id' lemmas below.
infixr ` ≅ `:10 := iso -- type as \cong or \iso
variables {C : Type u} [𝒞 : category.{u v} C]
include 𝒞
variables {X Y Z : C}
namespace iso
instance : has_coe (iso.{u v} X Y) (X ⟶ Y) :=
{ coe := iso.hom }
@[extensionality] lemma ext
(α β : X ≅ Y)
(w : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
begin
induction α with f g wα1 wα2,
induction β with h k wβ1 wβ2,
dsimp at *,
have p : g = k,
begin
induction w,
rw [← category.id_comp C k, ←wα2, category.assoc, wβ1, category.comp_id]
end,
induction p, induction w,
refl
end
@[symm] def symm (I : X ≅ Y) : Y ≅ X :=
{ hom := I.inv,
inv := I.hom,
hom_inv_id' := I.inv_hom_id',
inv_hom_id' := I.hom_inv_id' }
-- These are the restated lemmas for iso.hom_inv_id' and iso.inv_hom_id'
@[simp] lemma hom_inv_id (α : X ≅ Y) : (α : X ⟶ Y) ≫ (α.symm : Y ⟶ X) = 𝟙 X :=
begin unfold_coes, unfold symm, have p := α.hom_inv_id', dsimp at p, rw p end
@[simp] lemma inv_hom_id (α : X ≅ Y) : (α.symm : Y ⟶ X) ≫ (α : X ⟶ Y) = 𝟙 Y :=
begin unfold_coes, unfold symm, have p := iso.inv_hom_id', dsimp at p, rw p end
-- We rewrite the projections `.hom` and `.inv` into coercions.
@[simp] lemma hom_eq_coe (α : X ≅ Y) : α.hom = (α : X ⟶ Y) := rfl
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_coe (α : X ≅ Y) : α.inv = (α.symm : Y ⟶ X) := rfl
@[refl] def refl (X : C) : X ≅ X :=
{ hom := 𝟙 X,
inv := 𝟙 X }
@[simp] lemma refl_coe (X : C) : ((iso.refl X) : X ⟶ X) = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_symm_coe (X : C) : ((iso.refl X).symm : X ⟶ X) = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[trans] def trans (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : X ≅ Z :=
{ hom := (α : X ⟶ Y) ≫ (β : Y ⟶ Z),
inv := (β.symm : Z ⟶ Y) ≫ (α.symm : Y ⟶ X),
hom_inv_id' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ erw [category.assoc], conv { to_lhs, congr, skip, rw ← category.assoc }, rw iso.hom_inv_id, rw category.id_comp, rw iso.hom_inv_id end,
inv_hom_id' := begin /- `obviously'` says: -/ erw [category.assoc], conv { to_lhs, congr, skip, rw ← category.assoc }, rw iso.inv_hom_id, rw category.id_comp, rw iso.inv_hom_id end }
infixr ` ≪≫ `:80 := iso.trans -- type as `\ll \gg`.
@[simp] lemma trans_coe (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : ((α ≪≫ β) : X ⟶ Z) = (α : X ⟶ Y) ≫ (β : Y ⟶ Z) := rfl
@[simp] lemma trans_symm_coe (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : ((α ≪≫ β).symm : Z ⟶ X) = (β.symm : Z ⟶ Y) ≫ (α.symm : Y ⟶ X) := rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_symm (X : C) : ((iso.refl X).symm : X ⟶ X) = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[simp] lemma trans_symm (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : ((α ≪≫ β).symm : Z ⟶ X) = (β.symm : Z ⟶ Y) ≫ (α.symm : Y ⟶ X) := rfl
end iso
/-- `is_iso` typeclass expressing that a morphism is invertible.
This contains the data of the inverse, but is a subsingleton type. -/
class is_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(inv : Y ⟶ X)
(hom_inv_id' : f ≫ inv = 𝟙 X . obviously)
(inv_hom_id' : inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y . obviously)
def inv (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] := is_iso.inv f
namespace is_iso
instance (f : X ⟶ Y) : subsingleton (is_iso f) :=
⟨ λ a b, begin
cases a, cases b,
dsimp at *, congr,
rw [← category.id_comp _ a_inv, ← b_inv_hom_id', category.assoc, a_hom_inv_id', category.comp_id]
end ⟩
@[simp] def hom_inv_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : f ≫ category_theory.inv f = 𝟙 X :=
is_iso.hom_inv_id' f
@[simp] def inv_hom_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : category_theory.inv f ≫ f = 𝟙 Y :=
is_iso.inv_hom_id' f
instance (X : C) : is_iso (𝟙 X) :=
{ inv := 𝟙 X }
instance of_iso (f : X ≅ Y) : is_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
{ inv := (f.symm : Y ⟶ X) }
instance of_iso_inverse (f : X ≅ Y) : is_iso (f.symm : Y ⟶ X) :=
{ inv := (f : X ⟶ Y) }
end is_iso
namespace functor
universes u₁ v₁ u₂ v₂
variables {D : Type u₂}
variables [𝒟 : category.{u₂ v₂} D]
include 𝒟
def on_iso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : (F X) ≅ (F Y) :=
{ hom := F.map i.hom,
inv := F.map i.inv,
hom_inv_id' := by erw [←map_comp, iso.hom_inv_id, ←map_id],
inv_hom_id' := by erw [←map_comp, iso.inv_hom_id, ←map_id] }
@[simp] lemma on_iso_hom (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : ((F.on_iso i) : F X ⟶ F Y) = F.map (i : X ⟶ Y) := rfl
@[simp] lemma on_iso_inv (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : ((F.on_iso i).symm : F Y ⟶ F X) = F.map (i.symm : Y ⟶ X) := rfl
instance (F : C ⥤ D) (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : is_iso (F.map f) :=
{ inv := F.map (inv f),
hom_inv_id' := begin rw ← F.map_comp, erw is_iso.hom_inv_id, rw map_id, end,
inv_hom_id' := begin rw ← F.map_comp, erw is_iso.inv_hom_id, rw map_id, end }
end functor
instance epi_of_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : epi f :=
{ left_cancellation := begin
-- This is an interesting test case for better rewrite automation.
intros,
rw [←category.id_comp C g, ←category.id_comp C h],
rw [← is_iso.inv_hom_id f],
erw [category.assoc, w, category.assoc],
end }
instance mono_of_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] : mono f :=
{ right_cancellation := begin
intros,
rw [←category.comp_id C g, ←category.comp_id C h],
rw [← is_iso.hom_inv_id f],
erw [←category.assoc, w, ←category.assoc]
end }
def eq_to_iso {X Y : C} (p : X = Y) : X ≅ Y := by rw p
@[simp] lemma eq_to_iso_refl (X : C) (p : X = X) : eq_to_iso p = (iso.refl X) := rfl
@[simp] lemma eq_to_iso_trans {X Y Z : C} (p : X = Y) (q : Y = Z) : (eq_to_iso p) ≪≫ (eq_to_iso q) = eq_to_iso (p.trans q) :=
begin /- obviously' says: -/ ext, induction q, induction p, dsimp at *, simp at * end
namespace functor
universes u₁ v₁ u₂ v₂
variables {D : Type u₂} [𝒟 : category.{u₂ v₂} D]
include 𝒟
@[simp] lemma eq_to_iso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (p : X = Y) : F.on_iso (eq_to_iso p) = eq_to_iso (congr_arg F.obj p) :=
begin /- obviously says: -/ ext1, induction p, dsimp at *, simp at * end
end functor
def Aut (X : C) := X ≅ X
attribute [extensionality Aut] iso.ext
instance {X : C} : group (Aut X) :=
by refine { one := iso.refl X,
inv := iso.symm,
mul := iso.trans, .. } ; obviously
end category_theory
|
8cfd47b06ea1541032a06bc5d72dcc4d11213b37 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/measure_theory/integral/set_integral.lean | 67350e7fbc6f7cbe5594aca213c7ec1310576201 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 51,760 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import measure_theory.integral.integrable_on
import measure_theory.integral.bochner
import order.filter.indicator_function
import topology.metric_space.thickened_indicator
/-!
# Set integral
In this file we prove some properties of `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. Recall that this notation
is defined as `∫ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. In `integral_indicator` we prove that for a measurable
function `f` and a measurable set `s` this definition coincides with another natural definition:
`∫ x, indicator s f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`, where `indicator s f x` is equal to `f x` for `x ∈ s`
and is zero otherwise.
Since `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is a notation, one can rewrite or apply any theorem about `∫ x, f x ∂μ`
directly. In this file we prove some theorems about dependence of `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` on `s`, e.g.
`integral_union`, `integral_empty`, `integral_univ`.
We use the property `integrable_on f s μ := integrable f (μ.restrict s)`, defined in
`measure_theory.integrable_on`. We also defined in that same file a predicate
`integrable_at_filter (f : α → E) (l : filter α) (μ : measure α)` saying that `f` is integrable at
some set `s ∈ l`.
Finally, we prove a version of the
[Fundamental theorem of calculus](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_calculus)
for set integral, see `filter.tendsto.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae` and its corollaries.
Namely, consider a measurably generated filter `l`, a measure `μ` finite at this filter, and
a function `f` that has a finite limit `c` at `l ⊓ μ.ae`. Then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = μ s • c + o(μ s)`
as `s` tends to `l.small_sets`, i.e. for any `ε>0` there exists `t ∈ l` such that
`‖∫ x in s, f x ∂μ - μ s • c‖ ≤ ε * μ s` whenever `s ⊆ t`. We also formulate a version of this
theorem for a locally finite measure `μ` and a function `f` continuous at a point `a`.
## Notation
We provide the following notations for expressing the integral of a function on a set :
* `∫ a in s, f a ∂μ` is `measure_theory.integral (μ.restrict s) f`
* `∫ a in s, f a` is `∫ a in s, f a ∂volume`
Note that the set notations are defined in the file `measure_theory/integral/bochner`,
but we reference them here because all theorems about set integrals are in this file.
-/
noncomputable theory
open set filter topological_space measure_theory function
open_locale classical topological_space interval big_operators filter ennreal nnreal measure_theory
variables {α β E F : Type*} [measurable_space α]
namespace measure_theory
section normed_add_comm_group
variables [normed_add_comm_group E] {f g : α → E} {s t : set α} {μ ν : measure α}
{l l' : filter α}
variables [complete_space E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma set_integral_congr_ae (hs : measurable_set s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
integral_congr_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 h)
lemma set_integral_congr (hs : measurable_set s) (h : eq_on f g s) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_integral_congr_ae hs $ eventually_of_forall h
lemma set_integral_congr_set_ae (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
by rw measure.restrict_congr_set hst
lemma integral_union_ae (hst : ae_disjoint μ s t) (ht : null_measurable_set t μ)
(hfs : integrable_on f s μ) (hft : integrable_on f t μ) :
∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
by simp only [integrable_on, measure.restrict_union₀ hst ht, integral_add_measure hfs hft]
lemma integral_union (hst : disjoint s t) (ht : measurable_set t)
(hfs : integrable_on f s μ) (hft : integrable_on f t μ) :
∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
integral_union_ae hst.ae_disjoint ht.null_measurable_set hfs hft
lemma integral_diff (ht : measurable_set t) (hfs : integrable_on f s μ)
(hft : integrable_on f t μ) (hts : t ⊆ s) :
∫ x in s \ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
begin
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← integral_union, diff_union_of_subset hts],
exacts [disjoint_diff.symm, ht, hfs.mono_set (diff_subset _ _), hft]
end
lemma integral_finset_bUnion {ι : Type*} (t : finset ι) {s : ι → set α}
(hs : ∀ i ∈ t, measurable_set (s i)) (h's : set.pairwise ↑t (disjoint on s))
(hf : ∀ i ∈ t, integrable_on f (s i) μ) :
∫ x in (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), f x ∂ μ = ∑ i in t, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂ μ :=
begin
induction t using finset.induction_on with a t hat IH hs h's,
{ simp },
{ simp only [finset.coe_insert, finset.forall_mem_insert, set.pairwise_insert,
finset.set_bUnion_insert] at hs hf h's ⊢,
rw [integral_union _ _ hf.1 (integrable_on_finset_Union.2 hf.2)],
{ rw [finset.sum_insert hat, IH hs.2 h's.1 hf.2] },
{ simp only [disjoint_Union_right],
exact (λ i hi, (h's.2 i hi (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi hat).symm).1) },
{ exact finset.measurable_set_bUnion _ hs.2 } }
end
lemma integral_fintype_Union {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {s : ι → set α}
(hs : ∀ i, measurable_set (s i)) (h's : pairwise (disjoint on s))
(hf : ∀ i, integrable_on f (s i) μ) :
∫ x in (⋃ i, s i), f x ∂ μ = ∑ i, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂ μ :=
begin
convert integral_finset_bUnion finset.univ (λ i hi, hs i) _ (λ i _, hf i),
{ simp },
{ simp [pairwise_univ, h's] }
end
lemma integral_empty : ∫ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by rw [measure.restrict_empty, integral_zero_measure]
lemma integral_univ : ∫ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [measure.restrict_univ]
lemma integral_add_compl (hs : measurable_set s) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
by rw [← integral_union (@disjoint_compl_right (set α) _ _) hs.compl
hfi.integrable_on hfi.integrable_on, union_compl_self, integral_univ]
/-- For a function `f` and a measurable set `s`, the integral of `indicator s f`
over the whole space is equal to `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` defined as `∫ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. -/
lemma integral_indicator (hs : measurable_set s) :
∫ x, indicator s f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
begin
by_cases hfi : integrable_on f s μ, swap,
{ rwa [integral_undef, integral_undef],
rwa integrable_indicator_iff hs },
calc ∫ x, indicator s f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, indicator s f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, indicator s f x ∂μ :
(integral_add_compl hs (hfi.integrable_indicator hs)).symm
... = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, 0 ∂μ :
congr_arg2 (+) (integral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_restrict hs))
(integral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs))
... = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ : by simp
end
lemma set_integral_indicator (ht : measurable_set t) :
∫ x in s, t.indicator f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s ∩ t, f x ∂μ :=
by rw [integral_indicator ht, measure.restrict_restrict ht, set.inter_comm]
lemma of_real_set_integral_one_of_measure_ne_top {α : Type*} {m : measurable_space α}
{μ : measure α} {s : set α} (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.of_real (∫ x in s, (1 : ℝ) ∂μ) = μ s :=
calc
ennreal.of_real (∫ x in s, (1 : ℝ) ∂μ)
= ennreal.of_real (∫ x in s, ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ ∂μ) : by simp only [norm_one]
... = ∫⁻ x in s, 1 ∂μ :
begin
rw of_real_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm (integrable_on_const.2 (or.inr hs.lt_top)),
simp only [nnnorm_one, ennreal.coe_one],
end
... = μ s : set_lintegral_one _
lemma of_real_set_integral_one {α : Type*} {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α)
[is_finite_measure μ] (s : set α) :
ennreal.of_real (∫ x in s, (1 : ℝ) ∂μ) = μ s :=
of_real_set_integral_one_of_measure_ne_top (measure_ne_top μ s)
lemma integral_piecewise [decidable_pred (∈ s)] (hs : measurable_set s)
{f g : α → E} (hf : integrable_on f s μ) (hg : integrable_on g sᶜ μ) :
∫ x, s.piecewise f g x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, g x ∂μ :=
by rw [← set.indicator_add_compl_eq_piecewise,
integral_add' (hf.integrable_indicator hs) (hg.integrable_indicator hs.compl),
integral_indicator hs, integral_indicator hs.compl]
lemma tendsto_set_integral_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [countable ι] [semilattice_sup ι]
{s : ι → set α} {f : α → E} (hsm : ∀ i, measurable_set (s i))
(h_mono : monotone s) (hfi : integrable_on f (⋃ n, s n) μ) :
tendsto (λ i, ∫ a in s i, f a ∂μ) at_top (𝓝 (∫ a in (⋃ n, s n), f a ∂μ)) :=
begin
have hfi' : ∫⁻ x in ⋃ n, s n, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ < ∞ := hfi.2,
set S := ⋃ i, s i,
have hSm : measurable_set S := measurable_set.Union hsm,
have hsub : ∀ {i}, s i ⊆ S, from subset_Union s,
rw [← with_density_apply _ hSm] at hfi',
set ν := μ.with_density (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) with hν,
refine metric.nhds_basis_closed_ball.tendsto_right_iff.2 (λ ε ε0, _),
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le,
have : ∀ᶠ i in at_top, ν (s i) ∈ Icc (ν S - ε) (ν S + ε),
from tendsto_measure_Union h_mono (ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds hfi'.ne (ennreal.coe_pos.2 ε0).ne'),
refine this.mono (λ i hi, _),
rw [mem_closed_ball_iff_norm', ← integral_diff (hsm i) hfi (hfi.mono_set hsub) hsub,
← coe_nnnorm, nnreal.coe_le_coe, ← ennreal.coe_le_coe],
refine (ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _).trans _,
rw [← with_density_apply _ (hSm.diff (hsm _)), ← hν, measure_diff hsub (hsm _)],
exacts [tsub_le_iff_tsub_le.mp hi.1,
(hi.2.trans_lt $ ennreal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hfi', ennreal.coe_lt_top⟩).ne]
end
lemma has_sum_integral_Union_ae {ι : Type*} [countable ι] {s : ι → set α} {f : α → E}
(hm : ∀ i, null_measurable_set (s i) μ) (hd : pairwise (ae_disjoint μ on s))
(hfi : integrable_on f (⋃ i, s i) μ) :
has_sum (λ n, ∫ a in s n, f a ∂ μ) (∫ a in ⋃ n, s n, f a ∂μ) :=
begin
simp only [integrable_on, measure.restrict_Union_ae hd hm] at hfi ⊢,
exact has_sum_integral_measure hfi
end
lemma has_sum_integral_Union {ι : Type*} [countable ι] {s : ι → set α} {f : α → E}
(hm : ∀ i, measurable_set (s i)) (hd : pairwise (disjoint on s))
(hfi : integrable_on f (⋃ i, s i) μ) :
has_sum (λ n, ∫ a in s n, f a ∂ μ) (∫ a in ⋃ n, s n, f a ∂μ) :=
has_sum_integral_Union_ae (λ i, (hm i).null_measurable_set) (hd.mono (λ i j h, h.ae_disjoint)) hfi
lemma integral_Union {ι : Type*} [countable ι] {s : ι → set α} {f : α → E}
(hm : ∀ i, measurable_set (s i)) (hd : pairwise (disjoint on s))
(hfi : integrable_on f (⋃ i, s i) μ) :
(∫ a in (⋃ n, s n), f a ∂μ) = ∑' n, ∫ a in s n, f a ∂ μ :=
(has_sum.tsum_eq (has_sum_integral_Union hm hd hfi)).symm
lemma integral_Union_ae {ι : Type*} [countable ι] {s : ι → set α} {f : α → E}
(hm : ∀ i, null_measurable_set (s i) μ) (hd : pairwise (ae_disjoint μ on s))
(hfi : integrable_on f (⋃ i, s i) μ) :
(∫ a in (⋃ n, s n), f a ∂μ) = ∑' n, ∫ a in s n, f a ∂ μ :=
(has_sum.tsum_eq (has_sum_integral_Union_ae hm hd hfi)).symm
lemma set_integral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero {f : α → E} (hf : strongly_measurable f)
(ht_eq : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = 0) :
∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
begin
refine integral_eq_zero_of_ae _,
rw [eventually_eq, ae_restrict_iff (hf.measurable_set_eq_fun strongly_measurable_zero)],
refine eventually_of_forall (λ x hx, _),
rw pi.zero_apply,
exact ht_eq x hx,
end
lemma set_integral_union_eq_left {f : α → E} (hf : strongly_measurable f) (hfi : integrable f μ)
(hs : measurable_set s) (ht_eq : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = 0) :
∫ x in (s ∪ t), f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
begin
rw [← set.union_diff_self, union_comm, integral_union,
set_integral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero _ (λ x hx, ht_eq x (diff_subset _ _ hx)), zero_add],
exacts [hf, disjoint_diff.symm, hs, hfi.integrable_on, hfi.integrable_on]
end
lemma set_integral_neg_eq_set_integral_nonpos [linear_order E] [order_closed_topology E]
{f : α → E} (hf : strongly_measurable f) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x in {x | f x < 0}, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in {x | f x ≤ 0}, f x ∂μ :=
begin
have h_union : {x | f x ≤ 0} = {x | f x < 0} ∪ {x | f x = 0},
by { ext, simp_rw [set.mem_union, set.mem_set_of_eq], exact le_iff_lt_or_eq, },
rw h_union,
exact (set_integral_union_eq_left hf hfi (hf.measurable_set_lt strongly_measurable_const)
(λ x hx, hx)).symm,
end
lemma integral_norm_eq_pos_sub_neg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : strongly_measurable f)
(hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in {x | f x ≤ 0}, f x ∂μ :=
have h_meas : measurable_set {x | 0 ≤ f x}, from strongly_measurable_const.measurable_set_le hf,
calc ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, ‖f x‖ ∂μ + ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, ‖f x‖ ∂μ :
by rw ← integral_add_compl h_meas hfi.norm
... = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, ‖f x‖ ∂μ :
begin
congr' 1,
refine set_integral_congr h_meas (λ x hx, _),
dsimp only,
rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr _],
exact hx,
end
... = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, f x ∂μ :
begin
congr' 1,
rw ← integral_neg,
refine set_integral_congr h_meas.compl (λ x hx, _),
dsimp only,
rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_neg_self.mpr _],
rw [set.mem_compl_iff, set.nmem_set_of_iff] at hx,
linarith,
end
... = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in {x | f x ≤ 0}, f x ∂μ :
by { rw ← set_integral_neg_eq_set_integral_nonpos hf hfi, congr, ext1 x, simp, }
lemma set_integral_const (c : E) : ∫ x in s, c ∂μ = (μ s).to_real • c :=
by rw [integral_const, measure.restrict_apply_univ]
@[simp]
lemma integral_indicator_const (e : E) ⦃s : set α⦄ (s_meas : measurable_set s) :
∫ (a : α), s.indicator (λ (x : α), e) a ∂μ = (μ s).to_real • e :=
by rw [integral_indicator s_meas, ← set_integral_const]
@[simp]
lemma integral_indicator_one ⦃s : set α⦄ (hs : measurable_set s) :
∫ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = (μ s).to_real :=
(integral_indicator_const 1 hs).trans ((smul_eq_mul _).trans (mul_one _))
lemma set_integral_indicator_const_Lp {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hs : measurable_set s) (ht : measurable_set t)
(hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
∫ a in s, indicator_const_Lp p ht hμt x a ∂μ = (μ (t ∩ s)).to_real • x :=
calc ∫ a in s, indicator_const_Lp p ht hμt x a ∂μ
= (∫ a in s, t.indicator (λ _, x) a ∂μ) :
by rw set_integral_congr_ae hs (indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn.mono (λ x hx hxs, hx))
... = (μ (t ∩ s)).to_real • x : by rw [integral_indicator_const _ ht, measure.restrict_apply ht]
lemma integral_indicator_const_Lp {p : ℝ≥0∞} (ht : measurable_set t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
∫ a, indicator_const_Lp p ht hμt x a ∂μ = (μ t).to_real • x :=
calc ∫ a, indicator_const_Lp p ht hμt x a ∂μ
= ∫ a in univ, indicator_const_Lp p ht hμt x a ∂μ : by rw integral_univ
... = (μ (t ∩ univ)).to_real • x : set_integral_indicator_const_Lp measurable_set.univ ht hμt x
... = (μ t).to_real • x : by rw inter_univ
lemma set_integral_map {β} [measurable_space β] {g : α → β} {f : β → E} {s : set β}
(hs : measurable_set s)
(hf : ae_strongly_measurable f (measure.map g μ)) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
∫ y in s, f y ∂(measure.map g μ) = ∫ x in g ⁻¹' s, f (g x) ∂μ :=
begin
rw [measure.restrict_map_of_ae_measurable hg hs,
integral_map (hg.mono_measure measure.restrict_le_self) (hf.mono_measure _)],
exact measure.map_mono_of_ae_measurable measure.restrict_le_self hg
end
lemma _root_.measurable_embedding.set_integral_map {β} {_ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β}
(hf : measurable_embedding f) (g : β → E) (s : set β) :
∫ y in s, g y ∂(measure.map f μ) = ∫ x in f ⁻¹' s, g (f x) ∂μ :=
by rw [hf.restrict_map, hf.integral_map]
lemma _root_.closed_embedding.set_integral_map [topological_space α] [borel_space α]
{β} [measurable_space β] [topological_space β] [borel_space β]
{g : α → β} {f : β → E} (s : set β) (hg : closed_embedding g) :
∫ y in s, f y ∂(measure.map g μ) = ∫ x in g ⁻¹' s, f (g x) ∂μ :=
hg.measurable_embedding.set_integral_map _ _
lemma measure_preserving.set_integral_preimage_emb {β} {_ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : measure_preserving f μ ν) (h₂ : measurable_embedding f) (g : β → E) (s : set β) :
∫ x in f ⁻¹' s, g (f x) ∂μ = ∫ y in s, g y ∂ν :=
(h₁.restrict_preimage_emb h₂ s).integral_comp h₂ _
lemma measure_preserving.set_integral_image_emb {β} {_ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : measure_preserving f μ ν) (h₂ : measurable_embedding f) (g : β → E) (s : set α) :
∫ y in f '' s, g y ∂ν = ∫ x in s, g (f x) ∂μ :=
eq.symm $ (h₁.restrict_image_emb h₂ s).integral_comp h₂ _
lemma set_integral_map_equiv {β} [measurable_space β] (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (f : β → E) (s : set β) :
∫ y in s, f y ∂(measure.map e μ) = ∫ x in e ⁻¹' s, f (e x) ∂μ :=
e.measurable_embedding.set_integral_map f s
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ∞)
(hC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
‖∫ x in s, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
begin
rw ← measure.restrict_apply_univ at *,
haveI : is_finite_measure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨‹_›⟩,
exact norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const hC
end
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae' {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ∞)
(hC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → ‖f x‖ ≤ C) (hfm : ae_strongly_measurable f (μ.restrict s)) :
‖∫ x in s, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
begin
apply norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae hs,
have A : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∈ s → ‖ae_strongly_measurable.mk f hfm x‖ ≤ C,
{ filter_upwards [hC, hfm.ae_mem_imp_eq_mk] with _ h1 h2 h3,
rw [← h2 h3],
exact h1 h3 },
have B : measurable_set {x | ‖(hfm.mk f) x‖ ≤ C} :=
hfm.strongly_measurable_mk.norm.measurable measurable_set_Iic,
filter_upwards [hfm.ae_eq_mk, (ae_restrict_iff B).2 A] with _ h1 _,
rwa h1,
end
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae'' {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ∞) (hsm : measurable_set s)
(hC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
‖∫ x in s, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae hs $ by rwa [ae_restrict_eq hsm, eventually_inf_principal]
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ∞)
(hC : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) (hfm : ae_strongly_measurable f (μ.restrict s)) :
‖∫ x in s, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae' hs (eventually_of_forall hC) hfm
lemma norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const' {C : ℝ} (hs : μ s < ∞) (hsm : measurable_set s)
(hC : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
‖∫ x in s, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real :=
norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae'' hs hsm $ eventually_of_forall hC
lemma set_integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f)
(hfi : integrable_on f s μ) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0 :=
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi
lemma set_integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f)
(hfi : integrable_on f s μ) :
0 < ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ ↔ 0 < μ (support f ∩ s) :=
begin
rw [integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi, measure.restrict_apply₀],
rw support_eq_preimage,
exact hfi.ae_strongly_measurable.ae_measurable.null_measurable (measurable_set_singleton 0).compl
end
lemma set_integral_gt_gt {R : ℝ} {f : α → ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R) (hfm : measurable f)
(hfint : integrable_on f {x | ↑R < f x} μ) (hμ : μ {x | ↑R < f x} ≠ 0):
(μ {x | ↑R < f x}).to_real * R < ∫ x in {x | ↑R < f x}, f x ∂μ :=
begin
have : integrable_on (λ x, R) {x | ↑R < f x} μ,
{ refine ⟨ae_strongly_measurable_const, lt_of_le_of_lt _ hfint.2⟩,
refine set_lintegral_mono (measurable.nnnorm _).coe_nnreal_ennreal
hfm.nnnorm.coe_nnreal_ennreal (λ x hx, _),
{ exact measurable_const },
{ simp only [ennreal.coe_le_coe, real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hR,
real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (hR.trans $ le_of_lt hx), subtype.mk_le_mk],
exact le_of_lt hx } },
rw [← sub_pos, ← smul_eq_mul, ← set_integral_const, ← integral_sub hfint this,
set_integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae],
{ rw ← zero_lt_iff at hμ,
rwa set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right,
exact λ x hx, ne.symm (ne_of_lt $ sub_pos.2 hx) },
{ change ∀ᵐ x ∂(μ.restrict _), _,
rw ae_restrict_iff,
{ exact eventually_of_forall (λ x hx, sub_nonneg.2 $ le_of_lt hx) },
{ exact measurable_set_le measurable_zero (hfm.sub measurable_const) } },
{ exact integrable.sub hfint this },
end
lemma set_integral_trim {α} {m m0 : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α} (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → E}
(hf_meas : strongly_measurable[m] f) {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set[m] s) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂(μ.trim hm) :=
by rwa [integral_trim hm hf_meas, restrict_trim hm μ]
lemma integral_Icc_eq_integral_Ioc' [partial_order α] {f : α → E} {a b : α} (ha : μ {a} = 0) :
∫ t in Icc a b, f t ∂μ = ∫ t in Ioc a b, f t ∂μ :=
set_integral_congr_set_ae (Ioc_ae_eq_Icc' ha).symm
lemma integral_Ioc_eq_integral_Ioo' [partial_order α] {f : α → E} {a b : α} (hb : μ {b} = 0) :
∫ t in Ioc a b, f t ∂μ = ∫ t in Ioo a b, f t ∂μ :=
set_integral_congr_set_ae (Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' hb).symm
lemma integral_Icc_eq_integral_Ioc [partial_order α] {f : α → E} {a b : α} [has_no_atoms μ] :
∫ t in Icc a b, f t ∂μ = ∫ t in Ioc a b, f t ∂μ :=
integral_Icc_eq_integral_Ioc' $ measure_singleton a
lemma integral_Ioc_eq_integral_Ioo [partial_order α] {f : α → E} {a b : α} [has_no_atoms μ] :
∫ t in Ioc a b, f t ∂μ = ∫ t in Ioo a b, f t ∂μ :=
integral_Ioc_eq_integral_Ioo' $ measure_singleton b
end normed_add_comm_group
section mono
variables {μ : measure α} {f g : α → ℝ} {s t : set α}
(hf : integrable_on f s μ) (hg : integrable_on g s μ)
lemma set_integral_mono_ae_restrict (h : f ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a in s, g a ∂μ :=
integral_mono_ae hf hg h
lemma set_integral_mono_ae (h : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a in s, g a ∂μ :=
set_integral_mono_ae_restrict hf hg (ae_restrict_of_ae h)
lemma set_integral_mono_on (hs : measurable_set s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a in s, g a ∂μ :=
set_integral_mono_ae_restrict hf hg
(by simp [hs, eventually_le, eventually_inf_principal, ae_of_all _ h])
include hf hg -- why do I need this include, but we don't need it in other lemmas?
lemma set_integral_mono_on_ae (hs : measurable_set s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a in s, g a ∂μ :=
by { refine set_integral_mono_ae_restrict hf hg _, rwa [eventually_le, ae_restrict_iff' hs], }
omit hf hg
lemma set_integral_mono (h : f ≤ g) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a in s, g a ∂μ :=
integral_mono hf hg h
lemma set_integral_mono_set (hfi : integrable_on f t μ) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f)
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
integral_mono_measure (measure.restrict_mono_ae hst) hf hfi
lemma set_integral_ge_of_const_le {c : ℝ} (hs : measurable_set s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, c ≤ f x) (hfint : integrable_on (λ (x : α), f x) s μ) :
c * (μ s).to_real ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
begin
rw [mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, ← set_integral_const c],
exact set_integral_mono_on (integrable_on_const.2 (or.inr hμs.lt_top)) hfint hs hf,
end
end mono
section nonneg
variables {μ : measure α} {f : α → ℝ} {s : set α}
lemma set_integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f) :
0 ≤ ∫ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae hf
lemma set_integral_nonneg_of_ae (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
set_integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae hf)
lemma set_integral_nonneg (hs : measurable_set s) (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
0 ≤ ∫ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
set_integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict ((ae_restrict_iff' hs).mpr (ae_of_all μ hf))
lemma set_integral_nonneg_ae (hs : measurable_set s) (hf : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
0 ≤ ∫ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
set_integral_nonneg_of_ae_restrict $ by rwa [eventually_le, ae_restrict_iff' hs]
lemma set_integral_le_nonneg {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) (hf : strongly_measurable f)
(hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x in {y | 0 ≤ f y}, f x ∂μ :=
begin
rw [← integral_indicator hs,
← integral_indicator (strongly_measurable_const.measurable_set_le hf)],
exact integral_mono (hfi.indicator hs)
(hfi.indicator (strongly_measurable_const.measurable_set_le hf))
(indicator_le_indicator_nonneg s f),
end
lemma set_integral_nonpos_of_ae_restrict (hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
integral_nonpos_of_ae hf
lemma set_integral_nonpos_of_ae (hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
set_integral_nonpos_of_ae_restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae hf)
lemma set_integral_nonpos (hs : measurable_set s) (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → f a ≤ 0) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
set_integral_nonpos_of_ae_restrict ((ae_restrict_iff' hs).mpr (ae_of_all μ hf))
lemma set_integral_nonpos_ae (hs : measurable_set s) (hf : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ s → f a ≤ 0) :
∫ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
set_integral_nonpos_of_ae_restrict $ by rwa [eventually_le, ae_restrict_iff' hs]
lemma set_integral_nonpos_le {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) (hf : strongly_measurable f)
(hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x in {y | f y ≤ 0}, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
begin
rw [← integral_indicator hs,
← integral_indicator (hf.measurable_set_le strongly_measurable_const)],
exact integral_mono (hfi.indicator (hf.measurable_set_le strongly_measurable_const))
(hfi.indicator hs) (indicator_nonpos_le_indicator s f),
end
end nonneg
section tendsto_mono
variables {μ : measure α} [normed_add_comm_group E] [complete_space E] [normed_space ℝ E]
{s : ℕ → set α} {f : α → E}
lemma _root_.antitone.tendsto_set_integral (hsm : ∀ i, measurable_set (s i))
(h_anti : antitone s) (hfi : integrable_on f (s 0) μ) :
tendsto (λi, ∫ a in s i, f a ∂μ) at_top (𝓝 (∫ a in (⋂ n, s n), f a ∂μ)) :=
begin
let bound : α → ℝ := indicator (s 0) (λ a, ‖f a‖),
have h_int_eq : (λ i, ∫ a in s i, f a ∂μ) = (λ i, ∫ a, (s i).indicator f a ∂μ),
from funext (λ i, (integral_indicator (hsm i)).symm),
rw h_int_eq,
rw ← integral_indicator (measurable_set.Inter hsm),
refine tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence bound _ _ _ _,
{ intro n,
rw ae_strongly_measurable_indicator_iff (hsm n),
exact (integrable_on.mono_set hfi (h_anti (zero_le n))).1 },
{ rw integrable_indicator_iff (hsm 0),
exact hfi.norm, },
{ simp_rw norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm,
refine λ n, eventually_of_forall (λ x, _),
exact indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (h_anti (zero_le n)) (λ a, norm_nonneg _) _ },
{ filter_upwards with a using le_trans (h_anti.tendsto_indicator _ _ _) (pure_le_nhds _), },
end
end tendsto_mono
/-! ### Continuity of the set integral
We prove that for any set `s`, the function `λ f : α →₁[μ] E, ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is continuous. -/
section continuous_set_integral
variables [normed_add_comm_group E] {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_add_comm_group F]
[normed_space 𝕜 F] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {μ : measure α}
/-- For `f : Lp E p μ`, we can define an element of `Lp E p (μ.restrict s)` by
`(Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s).to_Lp f`. This map is additive. -/
lemma Lp_to_Lp_restrict_add (f g : Lp E p μ) (s : set α) :
((Lp.mem_ℒp (f + g)).restrict s).to_Lp ⇑(f + g)
= ((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s).to_Lp f + ((Lp.mem_ℒp g).restrict s).to_Lp g :=
begin
ext1,
refine (ae_restrict_of_ae (Lp.coe_fn_add f g)).mp _,
refine (Lp.coe_fn_add (mem_ℒp.to_Lp f ((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s))
(mem_ℒp.to_Lp g ((Lp.mem_ℒp g).restrict s))).mp _,
refine (mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp ((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s)).mp _,
refine (mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp ((Lp.mem_ℒp g).restrict s)).mp _,
refine (mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp ((Lp.mem_ℒp (f+g)).restrict s)).mono (λ x hx1 hx2 hx3 hx4 hx5, _),
rw [hx4, hx1, pi.add_apply, hx2, hx3, hx5, pi.add_apply],
end
/-- For `f : Lp E p μ`, we can define an element of `Lp E p (μ.restrict s)` by
`(Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s).to_Lp f`. This map commutes with scalar multiplication. -/
lemma Lp_to_Lp_restrict_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp F p μ) (s : set α) :
((Lp.mem_ℒp (c • f)).restrict s).to_Lp ⇑(c • f) = c • (((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s).to_Lp f) :=
begin
ext1,
refine (ae_restrict_of_ae (Lp.coe_fn_smul c f)).mp _,
refine (mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp ((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s)).mp _,
refine (mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp ((Lp.mem_ℒp (c • f)).restrict s)).mp _,
refine (Lp.coe_fn_smul c (mem_ℒp.to_Lp f ((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s))).mono
(λ x hx1 hx2 hx3 hx4, _),
rw [hx2, hx1, pi.smul_apply, hx3, hx4, pi.smul_apply],
end
/-- For `f : Lp E p μ`, we can define an element of `Lp E p (μ.restrict s)` by
`(Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s).to_Lp f`. This map is non-expansive. -/
lemma norm_Lp_to_Lp_restrict_le (s : set α) (f : Lp E p μ) :
‖((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s).to_Lp f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
begin
rw [Lp.norm_def, Lp.norm_def, ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (Lp.snorm_ne_top _) (Lp.snorm_ne_top _)],
refine (le_of_eq _).trans (snorm_mono_measure _ measure.restrict_le_self),
{ exact s, },
exact snorm_congr_ae (mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp _),
end
variables (α F 𝕜)
/-- Continuous linear map sending a function of `Lp F p μ` to the same function in
`Lp F p (μ.restrict s)`. -/
def Lp_to_Lp_restrict_clm (μ : measure α) (p : ℝ≥0∞) [hp : fact (1 ≤ p)] (s : set α) :
Lp F p μ →L[𝕜] Lp F p (μ.restrict s) :=
@linear_map.mk_continuous 𝕜 𝕜 (Lp F p μ) (Lp F p (μ.restrict s)) _ _ _ _ _ _ (ring_hom.id 𝕜)
⟨λ f, mem_ℒp.to_Lp f ((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s), λ f g, Lp_to_Lp_restrict_add f g s,
λ c f, Lp_to_Lp_restrict_smul c f s⟩
1 (by { intro f, rw one_mul, exact norm_Lp_to_Lp_restrict_le s f, })
variables {α F 𝕜}
variables (𝕜)
lemma Lp_to_Lp_restrict_clm_coe_fn [hp : fact (1 ≤ p)] (s : set α) (f : Lp F p μ) :
Lp_to_Lp_restrict_clm α F 𝕜 μ p s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f :=
mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp ((Lp.mem_ℒp f).restrict s)
variables {𝕜}
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_set_integral [normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E] (s : set α) :
continuous (λ f : α →₁[μ] E, ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) :=
begin
haveI : fact ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ 1) := ⟨le_rfl⟩,
have h_comp : (λ f : α →₁[μ] E, ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)
= (integral (μ.restrict s)) ∘ (λ f, Lp_to_Lp_restrict_clm α E ℝ μ 1 s f),
{ ext1 f,
rw [function.comp_apply, integral_congr_ae (Lp_to_Lp_restrict_clm_coe_fn ℝ s f)], },
rw h_comp,
exact continuous_integral.comp (Lp_to_Lp_restrict_clm α E ℝ μ 1 s).continuous,
end
end continuous_set_integral
end measure_theory
open measure_theory asymptotics metric
variables {ι : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E]
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus for set integrals: if `μ` is a measure that is finite at a
filter `l` and `f` is a measurable function that has a finite limit `b` at `l ⊓ μ.ae`, then `∫ x in
s i, f x ∂μ = μ (s i) • b + o(μ (s i))` at a filter `li` provided that `s i` tends to `l.small_sets`
along `li`. Since `μ (s i)` is an `ℝ≥0∞` number, we use `(μ (s i)).to_real` in the actual statement.
Often there is a good formula for `(μ (s i)).to_real`, so the formalization can take an optional
argument `m` with this formula and a proof `of `(λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real) =ᶠ[li] m`. Without these
arguments, `m i = (μ (s i)).to_real` is used in the output. -/
lemma filter.tendsto.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae
[normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E]
{μ : measure α} {l : filter α} [l.is_measurably_generated]
{f : α → E} {b : E} (h : tendsto f (l ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 b))
(hfm : strongly_measurable_at_filter f l μ) (hμ : μ.finite_at_filter l)
{s : ι → set α} {li : filter ι} (hs : tendsto s li l.small_sets)
(m : ι → ℝ := λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real)
(hsμ : (λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real) =ᶠ[li] m . tactic.interactive.refl) :
(λ i, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ - m i • b) =o[li] m :=
begin
suffices : (λ s, ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ - (μ s).to_real • b) =o[l.small_sets] (λ s, (μ s).to_real),
from (this.comp_tendsto hs).congr' (hsμ.mono $ λ a ha, ha ▸ rfl) hsμ,
refine is_o_iff.2 (λ ε ε₀, _),
have : ∀ᶠ s in l.small_sets, ∀ᶠ x in μ.ae, x ∈ s → f x ∈ closed_ball b ε :=
eventually_small_sets_eventually.2 (h.eventually $ closed_ball_mem_nhds _ ε₀),
filter_upwards [hμ.eventually, (hμ.integrable_at_filter_of_tendsto_ae hfm h).eventually,
hfm.eventually, this],
simp only [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm],
intros s hμs h_integrable hfm h_norm,
rw [← set_integral_const, ← integral_sub h_integrable (integrable_on_const.2 $ or.inr hμs),
real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ennreal.to_real_nonneg],
exact norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae' hμs h_norm (hfm.sub ae_strongly_measurable_const)
end
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus for set integrals, `nhds_within` version: if `μ` is a locally
finite measure and `f` is an almost everywhere measurable function that is continuous at a point `a`
within a measurable set `t`, then `∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ = μ (s i) • f a + o(μ (s i))` at a filter `li`
provided that `s i` tends to `(𝓝[t] a).small_sets` along `li`. Since `μ (s i)` is an `ℝ≥0∞`
number, we use `(μ (s i)).to_real` in the actual statement.
Often there is a good formula for `(μ (s i)).to_real`, so the formalization can take an optional
argument `m` with this formula and a proof `of `(λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real) =ᶠ[li] m`. Without these
arguments, `m i = (μ (s i)).to_real` is used in the output. -/
lemma continuous_within_at.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae
[topological_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
[normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E]
{μ : measure α} [is_locally_finite_measure μ] {a : α} {t : set α}
{f : α → E} (ha : continuous_within_at f t a) (ht : measurable_set t)
(hfm : strongly_measurable_at_filter f (𝓝[t] a) μ)
{s : ι → set α} {li : filter ι} (hs : tendsto s li (𝓝[t] a).small_sets)
(m : ι → ℝ := λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real)
(hsμ : (λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real) =ᶠ[li] m . tactic.interactive.refl) :
(λ i, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ - m i • f a) =o[li] m :=
by haveI : (𝓝[t] a).is_measurably_generated := ht.nhds_within_is_measurably_generated _;
exact (ha.mono_left inf_le_left).integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae
hfm (μ.finite_at_nhds_within a t) hs m hsμ
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus for set integrals, `nhds` version: if `μ` is a locally finite
measure and `f` is an almost everywhere measurable function that is continuous at a point `a`, then
`∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ = μ (s i) • f a + o(μ (s i))` at `li` provided that `s` tends to
`(𝓝 a).small_sets` along `li. Since `μ (s i)` is an `ℝ≥0∞` number, we use `(μ (s i)).to_real` in
the actual statement.
Often there is a good formula for `(μ (s i)).to_real`, so the formalization can take an optional
argument `m` with this formula and a proof `of `(λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real) =ᶠ[li] m`. Without these
arguments, `m i = (μ (s i)).to_real` is used in the output. -/
lemma continuous_at.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae
[topological_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
[normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E]
{μ : measure α} [is_locally_finite_measure μ] {a : α}
{f : α → E} (ha : continuous_at f a) (hfm : strongly_measurable_at_filter f (𝓝 a) μ)
{s : ι → set α} {li : filter ι} (hs : tendsto s li (𝓝 a).small_sets)
(m : ι → ℝ := λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real)
(hsμ : (λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real) =ᶠ[li] m . tactic.interactive.refl) :
(λ i, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ - m i • f a) =o[li] m :=
(ha.mono_left inf_le_left).integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae hfm (μ.finite_at_nhds a) hs m hsμ
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus for set integrals, `nhds_within` version: if `μ` is a locally
finite measure, `f` is continuous on a measurable set `t`, and `a ∈ t`, then `∫ x in (s i), f x ∂μ =
μ (s i) • f a + o(μ (s i))` at `li` provided that `s i` tends to `(𝓝[t] a).small_sets` along `li`.
Since `μ (s i)` is an `ℝ≥0∞` number, we use `(μ (s i)).to_real` in the actual statement.
Often there is a good formula for `(μ (s i)).to_real`, so the formalization can take an optional
argument `m` with this formula and a proof `of `(λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real) =ᶠ[li] m`. Without these
arguments, `m i = (μ (s i)).to_real` is used in the output. -/
lemma continuous_on.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae
[topological_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
[normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E] [second_countable_topology_either α E]
{μ : measure α} [is_locally_finite_measure μ] {a : α} {t : set α}
{f : α → E} (hft : continuous_on f t) (ha : a ∈ t) (ht : measurable_set t)
{s : ι → set α} {li : filter ι} (hs : tendsto s li (𝓝[t] a).small_sets)
(m : ι → ℝ := λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real)
(hsμ : (λ i, (μ (s i)).to_real) =ᶠ[li] m . tactic.interactive.refl) :
(λ i, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ - m i • f a) =o[li] m :=
(hft a ha).integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae ht
⟨t, self_mem_nhds_within, hft.ae_strongly_measurable ht⟩ hs m hsμ
section
/-! ### Continuous linear maps composed with integration
The goal of this section is to prove that integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
This holds for simple functions. The general result follows from the continuity of all involved
operations on the space `L¹`. Note that composition by a continuous linear map on `L¹` is not just
the composition, as we are dealing with classes of functions, but it has already been defined
as `continuous_linear_map.comp_Lp`. We take advantage of this construction here.
-/
open_locale complex_conjugate
variables {μ : measure α} {𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
[normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
{p : ennreal}
namespace continuous_linear_map
variables [complete_space F] [normed_space ℝ F]
lemma integral_comp_Lp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (φ : Lp E p μ) :
∫ a, (L.comp_Lp φ) a ∂μ = ∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ :=
integral_congr_ae $ coe_fn_comp_Lp _ _
lemma set_integral_comp_Lp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (φ : Lp E p μ) {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
∫ a in s, (L.comp_Lp φ) a ∂μ = ∫ a in s, L (φ a) ∂μ :=
set_integral_congr_ae hs ((L.coe_fn_comp_Lp φ).mono (λ x hx hx2, hx))
lemma continuous_integral_comp_L1 (L : E →L[𝕜] F) :
continuous (λ (φ : α →₁[μ] E), ∫ (a : α), L (φ a) ∂μ) :=
by { rw ← funext L.integral_comp_Lp, exact continuous_integral.comp (L.comp_LpL 1 μ).continuous, }
variables [complete_space E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma integral_comp_comm (L : E →L[𝕜] F) {φ : α → E} (φ_int : integrable φ μ) :
∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ) :=
begin
apply integrable.induction (λ φ, ∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ)),
{ intros e s s_meas s_finite,
rw [integral_indicator_const e s_meas, ← @smul_one_smul E ℝ 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ (μ s).to_real e,
continuous_linear_map.map_smul, @smul_one_smul F ℝ 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ (μ s).to_real (L e),
← integral_indicator_const (L e) s_meas],
congr' 1 with a,
rw set.indicator_comp_of_zero L.map_zero },
{ intros f g H f_int g_int hf hg,
simp [L.map_add, integral_add f_int g_int,
integral_add (L.integrable_comp f_int) (L.integrable_comp g_int), hf, hg] },
{ exact is_closed_eq L.continuous_integral_comp_L1 (L.continuous.comp continuous_integral) },
{ intros f g hfg f_int hf,
convert hf using 1 ; clear hf,
{ exact integral_congr_ae (hfg.fun_comp L).symm },
{ rw integral_congr_ae hfg.symm } },
all_goals { assumption }
end
lemma integral_apply {H : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group H] [normed_space 𝕜 H]
{φ : α → H →L[𝕜] E} (φ_int : integrable φ μ) (v : H) :
(∫ a, φ a ∂μ) v = ∫ a, φ a v ∂μ :=
((continuous_linear_map.apply 𝕜 E v).integral_comp_comm φ_int).symm
lemma integral_comp_comm' (L : E →L[𝕜] F) {K} (hL : antilipschitz_with K L) (φ : α → E) :
∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ) :=
begin
by_cases h : integrable φ μ,
{ exact integral_comp_comm L h },
have : ¬ (integrable (L ∘ φ) μ),
by rwa lipschitz_with.integrable_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz L.lipschitz hL (L.map_zero),
simp [integral_undef, h, this]
end
lemma integral_comp_L1_comm (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (φ : α →₁[μ] E) : ∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ) :=
L.integral_comp_comm (L1.integrable_coe_fn φ)
end continuous_linear_map
namespace linear_isometry
variables [complete_space F] [normed_space ℝ F] [complete_space E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma integral_comp_comm (L : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) (φ : α → E) : ∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ) :=
L.to_continuous_linear_map.integral_comp_comm' L.antilipschitz _
end linear_isometry
namespace continuous_linear_equiv
variables [complete_space F] [normed_space ℝ F] [complete_space E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma integral_comp_comm (L : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (φ : α → E) : ∫ a, L (φ a) ∂μ = L (∫ a, φ a ∂μ) :=
L.to_continuous_linear_map.integral_comp_comm' L.antilipschitz _
end continuous_linear_equiv
variables [complete_space E] [normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space F] [normed_space ℝ F]
@[norm_cast] lemma integral_of_real {f : α → ℝ} : ∫ a, (f a : 𝕜) ∂μ = ↑∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
(@is_R_or_C.of_real_li 𝕜 _).integral_comp_comm f
lemma integral_re {f : α → 𝕜} (hf : integrable f μ) :
∫ a, is_R_or_C.re (f a) ∂μ = is_R_or_C.re ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
(@is_R_or_C.re_clm 𝕜 _).integral_comp_comm hf
lemma integral_im {f : α → 𝕜} (hf : integrable f μ) :
∫ a, is_R_or_C.im (f a) ∂μ = is_R_or_C.im ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
(@is_R_or_C.im_clm 𝕜 _).integral_comp_comm hf
lemma integral_conj {f : α → 𝕜} : ∫ a, conj (f a) ∂μ = conj ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
(@is_R_or_C.conj_lie 𝕜 _).to_linear_isometry.integral_comp_comm f
lemma integral_coe_re_add_coe_im {f : α → 𝕜} (hf : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, (is_R_or_C.re (f x) : 𝕜) ∂μ + ∫ x, is_R_or_C.im (f x) ∂μ * is_R_or_C.I = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
rw [mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, ← integral_smul, ← integral_add],
{ congr,
ext1 x,
rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, is_R_or_C.re_add_im] },
{ exact hf.re.of_real },
{ exact hf.im.of_real.smul is_R_or_C.I }
end
lemma integral_re_add_im {f : α → 𝕜} (hf : integrable f μ) :
((∫ x, is_R_or_C.re (f x) ∂μ : ℝ) : 𝕜) + (∫ x, is_R_or_C.im (f x) ∂μ : ℝ) * is_R_or_C.I =
∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
by { rw [← integral_of_real, ← integral_of_real, integral_coe_re_add_coe_im hf] }
lemma set_integral_re_add_im {f : α → 𝕜} {i : set α} (hf : integrable_on f i μ) :
((∫ x in i, is_R_or_C.re (f x) ∂μ : ℝ) : 𝕜) +
(∫ x in i, is_R_or_C.im (f x) ∂μ : ℝ) * is_R_or_C.I = ∫ x in i, f x ∂μ :=
integral_re_add_im hf
lemma fst_integral {f : α → E × F} (hf : integrable f μ) :
(∫ x, f x ∂μ).1 = ∫ x, (f x).1 ∂μ :=
((continuous_linear_map.fst ℝ E F).integral_comp_comm hf).symm
lemma snd_integral {f : α → E × F} (hf : integrable f μ) :
(∫ x, f x ∂μ).2 = ∫ x, (f x).2 ∂μ :=
((continuous_linear_map.snd ℝ E F).integral_comp_comm hf).symm
lemma integral_pair {f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
∫ x, (f x, g x) ∂μ = (∫ x, f x ∂μ, ∫ x, g x ∂μ) :=
have _ := hf.prod_mk hg, prod.ext (fst_integral this) (snd_integral this)
lemma integral_smul_const {𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] (f : α → 𝕜) (c : E) :
∫ x, f x • c ∂μ = (∫ x, f x ∂μ) • c :=
begin
by_cases hf : integrable f μ,
{ exact ((1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜).smul_right c).integral_comp_comm hf },
{ by_cases hc : c = 0,
{ simp only [hc, integral_zero, smul_zero] },
rw [integral_undef hf, integral_undef, zero_smul],
simp_rw [integrable_smul_const hc, hf, not_false_iff] }
end
section inner
variables {E' : Type*} [inner_product_space 𝕜 E'] [complete_space E'] [normed_space ℝ E']
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner 𝕜 E' _ x y
lemma integral_inner {f : α → E'} (hf : integrable f μ) (c : E') :
∫ x, ⟪c, f x⟫ ∂μ = ⟪c, ∫ x, f x ∂μ⟫ :=
((@innerSL 𝕜 E' _ _ c).restrict_scalars ℝ).integral_comp_comm hf
lemma integral_eq_zero_of_forall_integral_inner_eq_zero (f : α → E') (hf : integrable f μ)
(hf_int : ∀ (c : E'), ∫ x, ⟪c, f x⟫ ∂μ = 0) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
by { specialize hf_int (∫ x, f x ∂μ), rwa [integral_inner hf, inner_self_eq_zero] at hf_int }
end inner
lemma integral_with_density_eq_integral_smul
{f : α → ℝ≥0} (f_meas : measurable f) (g : α → E) :
∫ a, g a ∂(μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) = ∫ a, f a • g a ∂μ :=
begin
by_cases hg : integrable g (μ.with_density (λ x, f x)), swap,
{ rw [integral_undef hg, integral_undef],
rwa [← integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul f_meas];
apply_instance },
refine integrable.induction _ _ _ _ _ hg,
{ assume c s s_meas hs,
rw integral_indicator s_meas,
simp_rw [← indicator_smul_apply, integral_indicator s_meas],
simp only [s_meas, integral_const, measure.restrict_apply', univ_inter, with_density_apply],
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral, ennreal.to_real_of_real, ← integral_smul_const],
{ refl },
{ exact integral_nonneg (λ x, nnreal.coe_nonneg _) },
{ refine ⟨(f_meas.coe_nnreal_real).ae_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable, _⟩,
rw with_density_apply _ s_meas at hs,
rw has_finite_integral,
convert hs,
ext1 x,
simp only [nnreal.nnnorm_eq] } },
{ assume u u' h_disj u_int u'_int h h',
change ∫ (a : α), (u a + u' a) ∂μ.with_density (λ (x : α), ↑(f x)) =
∫ (a : α), f a • (u a + u' a) ∂μ,
simp_rw [smul_add],
rw [integral_add u_int u'_int, h, h', integral_add],
{ exact (integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul f_meas).1 u_int },
{ exact (integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul f_meas).1 u'_int } },
{ have C1 : continuous (λ (u : Lp E 1 (μ.with_density (λ x, f x))),
∫ x, u x ∂(μ.with_density (λ x, f x))) := continuous_integral,
have C2 : continuous (λ (u : Lp E 1 (μ.with_density (λ x, f x))),
∫ x, f x • u x ∂μ),
{ have : continuous ((λ (u : Lp E 1 μ), ∫ x, u x ∂μ) ∘ (with_density_smul_li μ f_meas)) :=
continuous_integral.comp (with_density_smul_li μ f_meas).continuous,
convert this,
ext1 u,
simp only [function.comp_app, with_density_smul_li_apply],
exact integral_congr_ae (mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas u).coe_fn_to_Lp.symm },
exact is_closed_eq C1 C2 },
{ assume u v huv u_int hu,
rw [← integral_congr_ae huv, hu],
apply integral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [(ae_with_density_iff f_meas.coe_nnreal_ennreal).1 huv] with x hx,
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with h'x|h'x,
{ simp only [h'x, zero_smul]},
{ rw [hx _],
simpa only [ne.def, ennreal.coe_eq_zero] using h'x } }
end
lemma integral_with_density_eq_integral_smul₀
{f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (g : α → E) :
∫ a, g a ∂(μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) = ∫ a, f a • g a ∂μ :=
begin
let f' := hf.mk _,
calc ∫ a, g a ∂(μ.with_density (λ x, f x))
= ∫ a, g a ∂(μ.with_density (λ x, f' x)) :
begin
congr' 1,
apply with_density_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx,
rw hx,
end
... = ∫ a, f' a • g a ∂μ : integral_with_density_eq_integral_smul hf.measurable_mk _
... = ∫ a, f a • g a ∂μ :
begin
apply integral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx,
rw hx,
end
end
lemma set_integral_with_density_eq_set_integral_smul
{f : α → ℝ≥0} (f_meas : measurable f) (g : α → E) {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
∫ a in s, g a ∂(μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) = ∫ a in s, f a • g a ∂μ :=
by rw [restrict_with_density hs, integral_with_density_eq_integral_smul f_meas]
lemma set_integral_with_density_eq_set_integral_smul₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : set α}
(hf : ae_measurable f (μ.restrict s)) (g : α → E) (hs : measurable_set s) :
∫ a in s, g a ∂(μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) = ∫ a in s, f a • g a ∂μ :=
by rw [restrict_with_density hs, integral_with_density_eq_integral_smul₀ hf]
end
section thickened_indicator
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α]
lemma measure_le_lintegral_thickened_indicator_aux
(μ : measure α) {E : set α} (E_mble : measurable_set E) (δ : ℝ) :
μ E ≤ ∫⁻ a, (thickened_indicator_aux δ E a : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ :=
begin
convert_to lintegral μ (E.indicator (λ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞)))
≤ lintegral μ (thickened_indicator_aux δ E),
{ rw [lintegral_indicator _ E_mble],
simp only [lintegral_one, measure.restrict_apply, measurable_set.univ, univ_inter], },
{ apply lintegral_mono,
apply indicator_le_thickened_indicator_aux, },
end
lemma measure_le_lintegral_thickened_indicator
(μ : measure α) {E : set α} (E_mble : measurable_set E) {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) :
μ E ≤ ∫⁻ a, (thickened_indicator δ_pos E a : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ :=
begin
convert measure_le_lintegral_thickened_indicator_aux μ E_mble δ,
dsimp,
simp only [thickened_indicator_aux_lt_top.ne, ennreal.coe_to_nnreal, ne.def, not_false_iff],
end
end thickened_indicator
section bilinear_map
namespace measure_theory
variables {f : β → ℝ} {m m0 : measurable_space β} {μ : measure β}
lemma integrable.simple_func_mul (g : simple_func β ℝ) (hf : integrable f μ) :
integrable (g * f) μ :=
begin
refine simple_func.induction (λ c s hs, _) (λ g₁ g₂ h_disj h_int₁ h_int₂,
(h_int₁.add h_int₂).congr (by rw [simple_func.coe_add, add_mul])) g,
simp only [simple_func.const_zero, simple_func.coe_piecewise, simple_func.coe_const,
simple_func.coe_zero, set.piecewise_eq_indicator],
have : set.indicator s (function.const β c) * f = s.indicator (c • f),
{ ext1 x,
by_cases hx : x ∈ s,
{ simp only [hx, pi.mul_apply, set.indicator_of_mem, pi.smul_apply, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul] },
{ simp only [hx, pi.mul_apply, set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, zero_mul], }, },
rw [this, integrable_indicator_iff hs],
exact (hf.smul c).integrable_on,
end
lemma integrable.simple_func_mul' (hm : m ≤ m0) (g : @simple_func β m ℝ) (hf : integrable f μ) :
integrable (g * f) μ :=
by { rw ← simple_func.coe_to_larger_space_eq hm g, exact hf.simple_func_mul (g.to_larger_space hm) }
end measure_theory
end bilinear_map
|
8f7436dde5804f2614fee768aa6abd0c3353e7e9 | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/topology/metric_space/lipschitz.lean | fd3303832e9cdc450842704ee98eec59f83d6f9a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 28,176 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import logic.function.iterate
import data.set.intervals.proj_Icc
import topology.metric_space.basic
import topology.bornology.hom
/-!
# Lipschitz continuous functions
A map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is called *Lipschitz continuous*
with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y` we have `edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`.
There is also a version asserting this inequality only for `x` and `y` in some set `s`.
In this file we provide various ways to prove that various combinations of Lipschitz continuous
functions are Lipschitz continuous. We also prove that Lipschitz continuous functions are
uniformly continuous.
## Main definitions and lemmas
* `lipschitz_with K f`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0`
* `lipschitz_on_with K f`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0` on a set `s`
* `lipschitz_with.uniform_continuous`: a Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous
* `lipschitz_on_with.uniform_continuous_on`: a function which is Lipschitz on a set is uniformly
continuous on that set.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjuction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. Constructors whose names end with `'` take `K : ℝ` as an
argument, and return `lipschitz_with (real.to_nnreal K) f`.
-/
universes u v w x
open filter function set
open_locale topological_space nnreal ennreal
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x}
/-- A function `f` is Lipschitz continuous with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y`
we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y` -/
def lipschitz_with [pseudo_emetric_space α] [pseudo_emetric_space β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) :=
∀x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
lemma lipschitz_with_iff_dist_le_mul [pseudo_metric_space α] [pseudo_metric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} : lipschitz_with K f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y :=
by { simp only [lipschitz_with, edist_nndist, dist_nndist], norm_cast }
alias lipschitz_with_iff_dist_le_mul ↔ lipschitz_with.dist_le_mul lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul
/-- A function `f` is Lipschitz continuous with constant `K ≥ 0` on `s` if for all `x, y` in `s`
we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y` -/
def lipschitz_on_with [pseudo_emetric_space α] [pseudo_emetric_space β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β)
(s : set α) :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ s), edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
@[simp] lemma lipschitz_on_with_empty [pseudo_emetric_space α] [pseudo_emetric_space β] (K : ℝ≥0)
(f : α → β) : lipschitz_on_with K f ∅ :=
λ x x_in y y_in, false.elim x_in
lemma lipschitz_on_with.mono [pseudo_emetric_space α] [pseudo_emetric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{s t : set α} {f : α → β} (hf : lipschitz_on_with K f t) (h : s ⊆ t) : lipschitz_on_with K f s :=
λ x x_in y y_in, hf (h x_in) (h y_in)
lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul [pseudo_metric_space α] [pseudo_metric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{s : set α} {f : α → β} :
lipschitz_on_with K f s ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y :=
by { simp only [lipschitz_on_with, edist_nndist, dist_nndist], norm_cast }
alias lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul ↔
lipschitz_on_with.dist_le_mul lipschitz_on_with.of_dist_le_mul
@[simp] lemma lipschitz_on_univ [pseudo_emetric_space α] [pseudo_emetric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} : lipschitz_on_with K f univ ↔ lipschitz_with K f :=
by simp [lipschitz_on_with, lipschitz_with]
lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_restrict [pseudo_emetric_space α] [pseudo_emetric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} {s : set α} : lipschitz_on_with K f s ↔ lipschitz_with K (s.restrict f) :=
by simp only [lipschitz_on_with, lipschitz_with, set_coe.forall', restrict, subtype.edist_eq]
namespace lipschitz_with
section emetric
open emetric
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] [pseudo_emetric_space β] [pseudo_emetric_space γ]
variables {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
protected lemma lipschitz_on_with (h : lipschitz_with K f) (s : set α) : lipschitz_on_with K f s :=
λ x _ y _, h x y
lemma edist_le_mul (h : lipschitz_with K f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y := h x y
lemma edist_le_mul_of_le (h : lipschitz_with K f) (hr : edist x y ≤ r) :
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(h x y).trans $ ennreal.mul_left_mono hr
lemma edist_lt_mul_of_lt (h : lipschitz_with K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (hr : edist x y < r) :
edist (f x) (f y) < K * r :=
(h x y).trans_lt $ (ennreal.mul_lt_mul_left (ennreal.coe_ne_zero.2 hK) ennreal.coe_ne_top).2 hr
lemma maps_to_emetric_closed_ball (h : lipschitz_with K f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
maps_to f (closed_ball x r) (closed_ball (f x) (K * r)) :=
λ y hy, h.edist_le_mul_of_le hy
lemma maps_to_emetric_ball (h : lipschitz_with K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
maps_to f (ball x r) (ball (f x) (K * r)) :=
λ y hy, h.edist_lt_mul_of_lt hK hy
lemma edist_lt_top (hf : lipschitz_with K f) {x y : α} (h : edist x y ≠ ⊤) :
edist (f x) (f y) < ⊤ :=
(hf x y).trans_lt $ ennreal.mul_lt_top ennreal.coe_ne_top h
lemma mul_edist_le (h : lipschitz_with K f) (x y : α) :
(K⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) * edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y :=
begin
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv],
exact ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul' (h x y)
end
protected lemma of_edist_le (h : ∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y) :
lipschitz_with 1 f :=
λ x y, by simp only [ennreal.coe_one, one_mul, h]
protected lemma weaken (hf : lipschitz_with K f) {K' : ℝ≥0} (h : K ≤ K') :
lipschitz_with K' f :=
assume x y, le_trans (hf x y) $ ennreal.mul_right_mono (ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 h)
lemma ediam_image_le (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (s : set α) :
emetric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * emetric.diam s :=
begin
apply emetric.diam_le,
rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩,
exact hf.edist_le_mul_of_le (emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy)
end
lemma edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div (hf : lipschitz_with K f) {x y : α} {d : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : edist x y < d / K) : edist (f x) (f y) < d :=
calc edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y : hf x y
... < d : ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div' h
/-- A Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous -/
protected lemma uniform_continuous (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
uniform_continuous f :=
begin
refine emetric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 (λε εpos, _),
use [ε / K, ennreal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ne_of_gt εpos, ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩],
exact λ x y, hf.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div
end
/-- A Lipschitz function is continuous -/
protected lemma continuous (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
continuous f :=
hf.uniform_continuous.continuous
protected lemma const (b : β) : lipschitz_with 0 (λa:α, b) :=
assume x y, by simp only [edist_self, zero_le]
protected lemma id : lipschitz_with 1 (@id α) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ assume x y, le_rfl
protected lemma subtype_val (s : set α) : lipschitz_with 1 (subtype.val : s → α) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ assume x y, le_rfl
protected lemma subtype_coe (s : set α) : lipschitz_with 1 (coe : s → α) :=
lipschitz_with.subtype_val s
lemma subtype_mk (hf : lipschitz_with K f) {p : β → Prop} (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
lipschitz_with K (λ x, ⟨f x, hp x⟩ : α → {y // p y}) :=
hf
protected lemma eval {α : ι → Type u} [Π i, pseudo_emetric_space (α i)] [fintype ι] (i : ι) :
lipschitz_with 1 (function.eval i : (Π i, α i) → α i) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ λ f g, by convert edist_le_pi_edist f g i
protected lemma restrict (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (s : set α) :
lipschitz_with K (s.restrict f) :=
λ x y, hf x y
protected lemma comp {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) : lipschitz_with (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) :=
assume x y,
calc edist (f (g x)) (f (g y)) ≤ Kf * edist (g x) (g y) : hf _ _
... ≤ Kf * (Kg * edist x y) : ennreal.mul_left_mono (hg _ _)
... = (Kf * Kg : ℝ≥0) * edist x y : by rw [← mul_assoc, ennreal.coe_mul]
lemma comp_lipschitz_on_with {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {s : set α}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_on_with Kg g s) :
lipschitz_on_with (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) s :=
assume x hx y hy,
calc edist (f (g x)) (f (g y)) ≤ Kf * edist (g x) (g y) : hf _ _
... ≤ Kf * (Kg * edist x y) : ennreal.mul_left_mono (hg hx hy)
... = (Kf * Kg : ℝ≥0) * edist x y : by rw [← mul_assoc, ennreal.coe_mul]
protected lemma prod_fst : lipschitz_with 1 (@prod.fst α β) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ assume x y, le_max_left _ _
protected lemma prod_snd : lipschitz_with 1 (@prod.snd α β) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ assume x y, le_max_right _ _
protected lemma prod {f : α → β} {Kf : ℝ≥0} (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f)
{g : α → γ} {Kg : ℝ≥0} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (max Kf Kg) (λ x, (f x, g x)) :=
begin
assume x y,
rw [ennreal.coe_mono.map_max, prod.edist_eq, ennreal.max_mul],
exact max_le_max (hf x y) (hg x y)
end
protected lemma uncurry {f : α → β → γ} {Kα Kβ : ℝ≥0} (hα : ∀ b, lipschitz_with Kα (λ a, f a b))
(hβ : ∀ a, lipschitz_with Kβ (f a)) :
lipschitz_with (Kα + Kβ) (function.uncurry f) :=
begin
rintros ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩,
simp only [function.uncurry, ennreal.coe_add, add_mul],
apply le_trans (edist_triangle _ (f a₂ b₁) _),
exact add_le_add (le_trans (hα _ _ _) $ ennreal.mul_left_mono $ le_max_left _ _)
(le_trans (hβ _ _ _) $ ennreal.mul_left_mono $ le_max_right _ _)
end
protected lemma iterate {f : α → α} (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
∀n, lipschitz_with (K ^ n) (f^[n])
| 0 := lipschitz_with.id
| (n + 1) := by rw [pow_succ']; exact (iterate n).comp hf
lemma edist_iterate_succ_le_geometric {f : α → α} (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (x n) :
edist (f^[n] x) (f^[n + 1] x) ≤ edist x (f x) * K ^ n :=
begin
rw [iterate_succ, mul_comm],
simpa only [ennreal.coe_pow] using (hf.iterate n) x (f x)
end
protected lemma mul {f g : function.End α} {Kf Kg} (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f)
(hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf * Kg) (f * g : function.End α) :=
hf.comp hg
/-- The product of a list of Lipschitz continuous endomorphisms is a Lipschitz continuous
endomorphism. -/
protected lemma list_prod (f : ι → function.End α) (K : ι → ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ i, lipschitz_with (K i) (f i)) :
∀ l : list ι, lipschitz_with (l.map K).prod (l.map f).prod
| [] := by simpa using lipschitz_with.id
| (i :: l) := by { simp only [list.map_cons, list.prod_cons], exact (h i).mul (list_prod l) }
protected lemma pow {f : function.End α} {K} (h : lipschitz_with K f) :
∀ n : ℕ, lipschitz_with (K^n) (f^n : function.End α)
| 0 := lipschitz_with.id
| (n + 1) := by { rw [pow_succ, pow_succ], exact h.mul (pow n) }
end emetric
section metric
variables [pseudo_metric_space α] [pseudo_metric_space β] [pseudo_metric_space γ]
{K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} {x y : α} {r : ℝ}
protected lemma of_dist_le' {K : ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_with (real.to_nnreal K) f :=
of_dist_le_mul $ λ x y, le_trans (h x y) $
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (real.le_coe_to_nnreal K) dist_nonneg
protected lemma mk_one (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) :
lipschitz_with 1 f :=
of_dist_le_mul $ by simpa only [nnreal.coe_one, one_mul] using h
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
doesn't assume `0≤K`. -/
protected lemma of_le_add_mul' {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ) (h : ∀x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_with (real.to_nnreal K) f :=
have I : ∀ x y, f x - f y ≤ K * dist x y,
from assume x y, sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 (h x y),
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le' $
assume x y,
abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨I x y, dist_comm y x ▸ I y x⟩
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
assumes `0≤K`. -/
protected lemma of_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ≥0) (h : ∀x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_with K f :=
by simpa only [real.to_nnreal_coe] using lipschitz_with.of_le_add_mul' K h
protected lemma of_le_add {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + dist x y) :
lipschitz_with 1 f :=
lipschitz_with.of_le_add_mul 1 $ by simpa only [nnreal.coe_one, one_mul]
protected lemma le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : lipschitz_with K f) (x y) :
f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 $ le_trans (le_abs_self _) $ h.dist_le_mul x y
protected lemma iff_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} :
lipschitz_with K f ↔ ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
⟨lipschitz_with.le_add_mul, lipschitz_with.of_le_add_mul K⟩
lemma nndist_le (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (x y : α) :
nndist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * nndist x y :=
hf.dist_le_mul x y
lemma dist_le_mul_of_le (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (hr : dist x y ≤ r) :
dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(hf.dist_le_mul x y).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hr K.coe_nonneg
lemma maps_to_closed_ball (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
maps_to f (metric.closed_ball x r) (metric.closed_ball (f x) (K * r)) :=
λ y hy, hf.dist_le_mul_of_le hy
lemma dist_lt_mul_of_lt (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (hr : dist x y < r) :
dist (f x) (f y) < K * r :=
(hf.dist_le_mul x y).trans_lt $ (mul_lt_mul_left $ nnreal.coe_pos.2 hK.bot_lt).2 hr
lemma maps_to_ball (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
maps_to f (metric.ball x r) (metric.ball (f x) (K * r)) :=
λ y hy, hf.dist_lt_mul_of_lt hK hy
/-- A Lipschitz continuous map is a locally bounded map. -/
def to_locally_bounded_map (f : α → β) (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
locally_bounded_map α β :=
locally_bounded_map.of_map_bounded f $ λ s hs, let ⟨C, hC⟩ := metric.is_bounded_iff.1 hs
in metric.is_bounded_iff.2 ⟨K * C, ball_image_iff.2 $ λ x hx, ball_image_iff.2 $ λ y hy,
hf.dist_le_mul_of_le (hC hx hy)⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_to_locally_bounded_map (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
⇑(hf.to_locally_bounded_map f) = f :=
rfl
lemma comap_cobounded_le (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
comap f (bornology.cobounded β) ≤ bornology.cobounded α :=
(hf.to_locally_bounded_map f).2
lemma bounded_image (hf : lipschitz_with K f) {s : set α} (hs : metric.bounded s) :
metric.bounded (f '' s) :=
metric.bounded_iff_ediam_ne_top.2 $ ne_top_of_le_ne_top
(ennreal.mul_ne_top ennreal.coe_ne_top hs.ediam_ne_top) (hf.ediam_image_le s)
lemma diam_image_le (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (s : set α) (hs : metric.bounded s) :
metric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * metric.diam s :=
metric.diam_le_of_forall_dist_le (mul_nonneg K.coe_nonneg metric.diam_nonneg) $
ball_image_iff.2 $ λ x hx, ball_image_iff.2 $ λ y hy, hf.dist_le_mul_of_le $
metric.dist_le_diam_of_mem hs hx hy
protected lemma dist_left (y : α) : lipschitz_with 1 (λ x, dist x y) :=
lipschitz_with.of_le_add $ assume x z, by { rw [add_comm], apply dist_triangle }
protected lemma dist_right (x : α) : lipschitz_with 1 (dist x) :=
lipschitz_with.of_le_add $ assume y z, dist_triangle_right _ _ _
protected lemma dist : lipschitz_with 2 (function.uncurry $ @dist α _) :=
lipschitz_with.uncurry lipschitz_with.dist_left lipschitz_with.dist_right
lemma dist_iterate_succ_le_geometric {f : α → α} (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (x n) :
dist (f^[n] x) (f^[n + 1] x) ≤ dist x (f x) * K ^ n :=
begin
rw [iterate_succ, mul_comm],
simpa only [nnreal.coe_pow] using (hf.iterate n).dist_le_mul x (f x)
end
lemma _root_.lipschitz_with_max : lipschitz_with 1 (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, max p.1 p.2) :=
lipschitz_with.of_le_add $ λ p₁ p₂, sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 $
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _)
lemma _root_.lipschitz_with_min : lipschitz_with 1 (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, min p.1 p.2) :=
lipschitz_with.of_le_add $ λ p₁ p₂, sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 $
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_min_sub_min_le_max _ _ _ _)
end metric
section emetric
variables {α} [pseudo_emetric_space α] {f g : α → ℝ} {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0}
protected lemma max (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (max Kf Kg) (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) :=
by simpa only [(∘), one_mul] using lipschitz_with_max.comp (hf.prod hg)
protected lemma min (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (max Kf Kg) (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) :=
by simpa only [(∘), one_mul] using lipschitz_with_min.comp (hf.prod hg)
lemma max_const (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (a : ℝ) : lipschitz_with Kf (λ x, max (f x) a) :=
by simpa only [max_eq_left (zero_le Kf)] using hf.max (lipschitz_with.const a)
lemma const_max (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (a : ℝ) : lipschitz_with Kf (λ x, max a (f x)) :=
by simpa only [max_comm] using hf.max_const a
lemma min_const (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (a : ℝ) : lipschitz_with Kf (λ x, min (f x) a) :=
by simpa only [max_eq_left (zero_le Kf)] using hf.min (lipschitz_with.const a)
lemma const_min (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (a : ℝ) : lipschitz_with Kf (λ x, min a (f x)) :=
by simpa only [min_comm] using hf.min_const a
end emetric
protected lemma proj_Icc {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
lipschitz_with 1 (proj_Icc a b h) :=
((lipschitz_with.id.const_min _).const_max _).subtype_mk _
end lipschitz_with
namespace metric
variables [pseudo_metric_space α] [pseudo_metric_space β] {s : set α} {t : set β}
lemma bounded.left_of_prod (h : bounded (s ×ˢ t)) (ht : t.nonempty) : bounded s :=
by simpa only [fst_image_prod s ht] using (@lipschitz_with.prod_fst α β _ _).bounded_image h
lemma bounded.right_of_prod (h : bounded (s ×ˢ t)) (hs : s.nonempty) : bounded t :=
by simpa only [snd_image_prod hs t] using (@lipschitz_with.prod_snd α β _ _).bounded_image h
lemma bounded_prod_of_nonempty (hs : s.nonempty) (ht : t.nonempty) :
bounded (s ×ˢ t) ↔ bounded s ∧ bounded t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.left_of_prod ht, h.right_of_prod hs⟩, λ h, h.1.prod h.2⟩
lemma bounded_prod : bounded (s ×ˢ t) ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ ∨ bounded s ∧ bounded t :=
begin
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|hs, { simp },
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|ht, { simp },
simp only [bounded_prod_of_nonempty hs ht, hs.ne_empty, ht.ne_empty, false_or]
end
end metric
namespace lipschitz_on_with
section emetric
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] [pseudo_emetric_space β] [pseudo_emetric_space γ]
variables {K : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} {f : α → β}
protected lemma uniform_continuous_on (hf : lipschitz_on_with K f s) : uniform_continuous_on f s :=
uniform_continuous_on_iff_restrict.mpr (lipschitz_on_with_iff_restrict.mp hf).uniform_continuous
protected lemma continuous_on (hf : lipschitz_on_with K f s) : continuous_on f s :=
hf.uniform_continuous_on.continuous_on
lemma edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div (hf : lipschitz_on_with K f s) {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{d : ℝ≥0∞} (hd : edist x y < d / K) : edist (f x) (f y) < d :=
(lipschitz_on_with_iff_restrict.mp hf).edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div $
show edist (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) ⟨y, hy⟩ < d / K, from hd
end emetric
section metric
variables [pseudo_metric_space α] [pseudo_metric_space β] [pseudo_metric_space γ]
variables {K : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} {f : α → β}
protected lemma of_dist_le' {K : ℝ} (h : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_on_with (real.to_nnreal K) f s :=
of_dist_le_mul $ λ x hx y hy, le_trans (h x hx y hy) $
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (real.le_coe_to_nnreal K) dist_nonneg
protected lemma mk_one (h : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) :
lipschitz_on_with 1 f s :=
of_dist_le_mul $ by simpa only [nnreal.coe_one, one_mul] using h
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
doesn't assume `0≤K`. -/
protected lemma of_le_add_mul' {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ)
(h : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_on_with (real.to_nnreal K) f s :=
have I : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), f x - f y ≤ K * dist x y,
from assume x hx y hy, sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 (h x hx y hy),
lipschitz_on_with.of_dist_le' $
assume x hx y hy,
abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨I x hx y hy, dist_comm y x ▸ I y hy x hx⟩
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
assumes `0≤K`. -/
protected lemma of_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_on_with K f s :=
by simpa only [real.to_nnreal_coe] using lipschitz_on_with.of_le_add_mul' K h
protected lemma of_le_add {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), f x ≤ f y + dist x y) :
lipschitz_on_with 1 f s :=
lipschitz_on_with.of_le_add_mul 1 $ by simpa only [nnreal.coe_one, one_mul]
protected lemma le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : lipschitz_on_with K f s)
{x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) {y : α} (hy : y ∈ s) :
f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 $ le_trans (le_abs_self _) $ h.dist_le_mul x hx y hy
protected lemma iff_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} :
lipschitz_on_with K f s ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
⟨lipschitz_on_with.le_add_mul, lipschitz_on_with.of_le_add_mul K⟩
end metric
end lipschitz_on_with
/-- Consider a function `f : α × β → γ`. Suppose that it is continuous on each “vertical fiber”
`{a} × t`, `a ∈ s`, and is Lipschitz continuous on each “horizontal fiber” `s × {b}`, `b ∈ t`
with the same Lipschitz constant `K`. Then it is continuous on `s × t`.
The actual statement uses (Lipschitz) continuity of `λ y, f (a, y)` and `λ x, f (x, b)` instead
of continuity of `f` on subsets of the product space. -/
lemma continuous_on_prod_of_continuous_on_lipschitz_on [pseudo_emetric_space α]
[topological_space β] [pseudo_emetric_space γ] (f : α × β → γ) {s : set α} {t : set β}
(K : ℝ≥0) (ha : ∀ a ∈ s, continuous_on (λ y, f (a, y)) t)
(hb : ∀ b ∈ t, lipschitz_on_with K (λ x, f (x, b)) s) :
continuous_on f (s ×ˢ t) :=
begin
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx : x ∈ s, hy : y ∈ t⟩,
refine emetric.tendsto_nhds.2 (λ ε (ε0 : 0 < ε), _),
replace ε0 : 0 < ε / 2 := ennreal.half_pos (ne_of_gt ε0),
have εK : 0 < ε / 2 / K := ennreal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ε0.ne', ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩,
have A : s ∩ emetric.ball x (ε / 2 / K) ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
inter_mem_nhds_within _ (emetric.ball_mem_nhds _ εK),
have B : {b : β | b ∈ t ∧ edist (f (x, b)) (f (x, y)) < ε / 2} ∈ 𝓝[t] y :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhds_within (ha x hx y hy (emetric.ball_mem_nhds _ ε0)),
filter_upwards [nhds_within_prod A B],
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨⟨has : a ∈ s, hax : edist a x < ε / 2 / K⟩,
hbt : b ∈ t, hby : edist (f (x, b)) (f (x, y)) < ε / 2⟩,
calc edist (f (a, b)) (f (x, y)) ≤ edist (f (a, b)) (f (x, b)) + edist (f (x, b)) (f (x, y)) :
edist_triangle _ _ _
... < ε / 2 + ε / 2 : ennreal.add_lt_add ((hb _ hbt).edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div has hx hax) hby
... = ε : ennreal.add_halves ε
end
/-- Consider a function `f : α × β → γ`. Suppose that it is continuous on each “vertical section”
`{a} × univ`, `a : α`, and is Lipschitz continuous on each “horizontal section”
`univ × {b}`, `b : β` with the same Lipschitz constant `K`. Then it is continuous.
The actual statement uses (Lipschitz) continuity of `λ y, f (a, y)` and `λ x, f (x, b)` instead
of continuity of `f` on subsets of the product space. -/
lemma continuous_prod_of_continuous_lipschitz [pseudo_emetric_space α]
[topological_space β] [pseudo_emetric_space γ] (f : α × β → γ) (K : ℝ≥0)
(ha : ∀ a, continuous (λ y, f (a, y))) (hb : ∀ b, lipschitz_with K (λ x, f (x, b))) :
continuous f :=
begin
simp only [continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ, ← univ_prod_univ, ← lipschitz_on_univ] at *,
exact continuous_on_prod_of_continuous_on_lipschitz_on f K (λ a _, ha a) (λ b _, hb b)
end
open metric
/-- If a function is locally Lipschitz around a point, then it is continuous at this point. -/
lemma continuous_at_of_locally_lipschitz [pseudo_metric_space α] [pseudo_metric_space β]
{f : α → β} {x : α}
{r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (K : ℝ) (h : ∀ y, dist y x < r → dist (f y) (f x) ≤ K * dist y x) :
continuous_at f x :=
begin
-- We use `h` to squeeze `dist (f y) (f x)` between `0` and `K * dist y x`
refine tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2
(squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall $ λ _, dist_nonneg)
(mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ hr) h) _),
-- Then show that `K * dist y x` tends to zero as `y → x`
refine (continuous_const.mul (continuous_id.dist continuous_const)).tendsto' _ _ _,
simp
end
/-- A function `f : α → ℝ` which is `K`-Lipschitz on a subset `s` admits a `K`-Lipschitz extension
to the whole space. -/
lemma lipschitz_on_with.extend_real [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : α → ℝ} {s : set α} {K : ℝ≥0}
(hf : lipschitz_on_with K f s) :
∃ g : α → ℝ, lipschitz_with K g ∧ eq_on f g s :=
begin
/- An extension is given by `g y = Inf {f x + K * dist y x | x ∈ s}`. Taking `x = y`, one has
`g y ≤ f y` for `y ∈ s`, and the other inequality holds because `f` is `K`-Lipschitz, so that it
can not counterbalance the growth of `K * dist y x`. One readily checks from the formula that the
extended function is also `K`-Lipschitz. -/
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|hs,
{ exact ⟨λ x, 0, (lipschitz_with.const _).weaken (zero_le _), eq_on_empty _ _⟩ },
haveI : nonempty s, by simp only [hs, nonempty_coe_sort],
let g := λ (y : α), infi (λ (x : s), f x + K * dist y x),
have B : ∀ (y : α), bdd_below (range (λ (x : s), f x + K * dist y x)),
{ assume y,
rcases hs with ⟨z, hz⟩,
refine ⟨f z - K * dist y z, _⟩,
rintros w ⟨t, rfl⟩,
dsimp,
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add, add_assoc, ← mul_add, add_comm (dist y t)],
calc f z ≤ f t + K * dist z t : hf.le_add_mul hz t.2
... ≤ f t + K * (dist y z + dist y t) :
add_le_add_left (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (dist_triangle_left _ _ _) K.2) _ },
have E : eq_on f g s,
{ assume x hx,
refine le_antisymm (le_cinfi (λ y, hf.le_add_mul hx y.2)) _,
simpa only [add_zero, subtype.coe_mk, mul_zero, dist_self] using cinfi_le (B x) ⟨x, hx⟩ },
refine ⟨g, lipschitz_with.of_le_add_mul K (λ x y, _), E⟩,
rw ← sub_le_iff_le_add,
refine le_cinfi (λ z, _),
rw sub_le_iff_le_add,
calc g x ≤ f z + K * dist x z : cinfi_le (B x) _
... ≤ f z + K * dist y z + K * dist x y :
begin
rw [add_assoc, ← mul_add, add_comm (dist y z)],
exact add_le_add_left (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (dist_triangle _ _ _) K.2) _,
end
end
/-- A function `f : α → (ι → ℝ)` which is `K`-Lipschitz on a subset `s` admits a `K`-Lipschitz
extension to the whole space.
TODO: state the same result (with the same proof) for the space `ℓ^∞ (ι, ℝ)` over a possibly
infinite type `ι`. -/
lemma lipschitz_on_with.extend_pi [pseudo_metric_space α] [fintype ι]
{f : α → (ι → ℝ)} {s : set α} {K : ℝ≥0}
(hf : lipschitz_on_with K f s) :
∃ g : α → (ι → ℝ), lipschitz_with K g ∧ eq_on f g s :=
begin
have : ∀ i, ∃ g : α → ℝ, lipschitz_with K g ∧ eq_on (λ x, f x i) g s,
{ assume i,
have : lipschitz_on_with K (λ (x : α), f x i) s,
{ apply lipschitz_on_with.of_dist_le_mul (λ x hx y hy, _),
exact (dist_le_pi_dist _ _ i).trans (hf.dist_le_mul x hx y hy) },
exact this.extend_real },
choose g hg using this,
refine ⟨λ x i, g i x, lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul (λ x y, _), _⟩,
{ exact (dist_pi_le_iff (mul_nonneg K.2 dist_nonneg)).2 (λ i, (hg i).1.dist_le_mul x y) },
{ assume x hx,
ext1 i,
exact (hg i).2 hx }
end
|
cf6c7f7e8c867697381b148784bc7f540445c928 | b2e508d02500f1512e1618150413e6be69d9db10 | /src/data/mv_polynomial.lean | 3d70a0f18fcffad04d9ae334c6583dad912eef66 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | callum-sutton/mathlib | c3788f90216e9cd43eeffcb9f8c9f959b3b01771 | afd623825a3ac6bfbcc675a9b023edad3f069e89 | refs/heads/master | 1,591,371,888,053 | 1,560,990,690,000 | 1,560,990,690,000 | 192,476,045 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,941,843,000 | 1,560,837,965,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,055 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
Multivariate Polynomial
-/
import algebra.ring
import data.finsupp data.polynomial data.equiv.algebra
open set function finsupp lattice
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`α` is the coefficient ring -/
def mv_polynomial (σ : Type*) (α : Type*) [comm_semiring α] := (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ α
namespace mv_polynomial
variables {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : α} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
variables [decidable_eq σ] [decidable_eq α]
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring α] {p q : mv_polynomial σ α}
instance : decidable_eq (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.decidable_eq
instance : has_zero (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.has_zero
instance : has_one (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.has_one
instance : has_add (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.has_add
instance : has_mul (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.has_mul
instance : comm_semiring (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.to_comm_semiring
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : α) : mv_polynomial σ α := single s a
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C (a : α) : mv_polynomial σ α := monomial 0 a
/-- `X n` is the polynomial with value X_n -/
def X (n : σ) : mv_polynomial σ α := monomial (single n 1) 1
@[simp] lemma C_0 : C 0 = (0 : mv_polynomial σ α) := by simp [C, monomial]; refl
@[simp] lemma C_1 : C 1 = (1 : mv_polynomial σ α) := rfl
lemma C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') :=
by simp [C, monomial, single_mul_single]
@[simp] lemma C_add : (C (a + a') : mv_polynomial σ α) = C a + C a' := single_add
@[simp] lemma C_mul : (C (a * a') : mv_polynomial σ α) = C a * C a' := C_mul_monomial.symm
instance : is_semiring_hom (C : α → mv_polynomial σ α) :=
{ map_zero := C_0,
map_one := C_1,
map_add := λ a a', C_add,
map_mul := λ a a', C_mul }
lemma X_pow_eq_single : X n ^ e = monomial (single n e) (1 : α) :=
begin
induction e,
{ simp [X], refl },
{ simp [pow_succ, e_ih],
simp [X, monomial, single_mul_single, nat.succ_eq_add_one] }
end
lemma monomial_add_single : monomial (s + single n e) a = (monomial s a * X n ^ e):=
by rw [X_pow_eq_single, monomial, monomial, monomial, single_mul_single]; simp
lemma monomial_single_add : monomial (single n e + s) a = (X n ^ e * monomial s a):=
by rw [X_pow_eq_single, monomial, monomial, monomial, single_mul_single]; simp
lemma monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod $ λn e, X n ^ e : mv_polynomial σ α) :=
begin
apply @finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ _ _ s,
{ simp [C, prod_zero_index]; exact (mul_one _).symm },
{ assume n e s hns he ih,
simp [prod_add_index, prod_single_index, pow_zero, pow_add, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, ih.symm,
monomial_add_single] }
end
@[recursor 7]
lemma induction_on {M : mv_polynomial σ α → Prop} (p : mv_polynomial σ α)
(h_C : ∀a, M (C a)) (h_add : ∀p q, M p → M q → M (p + q)) (h_X : ∀p n, M p → M (p * X n)) :
M p :=
have ∀s a, M (monomial s a),
begin
assume s a,
apply @finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ _ _ s,
{ show M (monomial 0 a), from h_C a, },
{ assume n e p hpn he ih,
have : ∀e:ℕ, M (monomial p a * X n ^ e),
{ intro e,
induction e,
{ simp [ih] },
{ simp [ih, pow_succ', (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, h_X, e_ih] } },
simp [monomial_add_single, this] }
end,
finsupp.induction p
(by have : M (C 0) := h_C 0; rwa [C_0] at this)
(assume s a p hsp ha hp, h_add _ _ (this s a) hp)
lemma hom_eq_hom [semiring γ]
(f g : mv_polynomial σ α → γ) (hf : is_semiring_hom f) (hg : is_semiring_hom g)
(hC : ∀a:α, f (C a) = g (C a)) (hX : ∀n:σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
f p = g p :=
mv_polynomial.induction_on p hC
begin assume p q hp hq, rw [is_semiring_hom.map_add f, is_semiring_hom.map_add g, hp, hq] end
begin assume p n hp, rw [is_semiring_hom.map_mul f, is_semiring_hom.map_mul g, hp, hX] end
lemma is_id (f : mv_polynomial σ α → mv_polynomial σ α) (hf : is_semiring_hom f)
(hC : ∀a:α, f (C a) = (C a)) (hX : ∀n:σ, f (X n) = (X n)) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f id hf is_semiring_hom.id hC hX p
section eval₂
variables [comm_semiring β]
variables (f : α → β) (g : σ → β)
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` given a valuation `g` of all the variables
and a ring hom `f` from the scalar ring to the target -/
def eval₂ (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : β :=
p.sum (λs a, f a * s.prod (λn e, g n ^ e))
@[simp] lemma eval₂_zero : (0 : mv_polynomial σ α).eval₂ f g = 0 :=
finsupp.sum_zero_index
variables [is_semiring_hom f]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f g + q.eval₂ f g :=
finsupp.sum_add_index
(by simp [is_semiring_hom.map_zero f])
(by simp [add_mul, is_semiring_hom.map_add f])
@[simp] lemma eval₂_monomial : (monomial s a).eval₂ f g = f a * s.prod (λn e, g n ^ e) :=
finsupp.sum_single_index (by simp [is_semiring_hom.map_zero f])
@[simp] lemma eval₂_C (a) : (C a).eval₂ f g = f a :=
by simp [eval₂_monomial, C, prod_zero_index]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_one : (1 : mv_polynomial σ α).eval₂ f g = 1 :=
(eval₂_C _ _ _).trans (is_semiring_hom.map_one f)
@[simp] lemma eval₂_X (n) : (X n).eval₂ f g = g n :=
by simp [eval₂_monomial,
is_semiring_hom.map_one f, X, prod_single_index, pow_one]
lemma eval₂_mul_monomial :
∀{s a}, (p * monomial s a).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f g * f a * s.prod (λn e, g n ^ e) :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.induction_on p,
{ assume a' s a,
simp [C_mul_monomial, eval₂_monomial, is_semiring_hom.map_mul f] },
{ assume p q ih_p ih_q, simp [add_mul, eval₂_add, ih_p, ih_q] },
{ assume p n ih s a,
from calc (p * X n * monomial s a).eval₂ f g = (p * monomial (single n 1 + s) a).eval₂ f g :
by simp [monomial_single_add, -add_comm, pow_one, mul_assoc]
... = (p * monomial (single n 1) 1).eval₂ f g * f a * s.prod (λn e, g n ^ e) :
by simp [ih, prod_single_index, prod_add_index, pow_one, pow_add, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm,
is_semiring_hom.map_one f, -add_comm] }
end
lemma eval₂_mul : ∀{p}, (p * q).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f g * q.eval₂ f g :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.induction_on q,
{ simp [C, eval₂_monomial, eval₂_mul_monomial, prod_zero_index] },
{ simp [mul_add, eval₂_add] {contextual := tt} },
{ simp [X, eval₂_monomial, eval₂_mul_monomial, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm] { contextual := tt} }
end
lemma eval₂_pow {p:mv_polynomial σ α} : ∀{n:ℕ}, (p ^ n).eval₂ f g = (p.eval₂ f g)^n
| 0 := eval₂_one _ _
| (n + 1) := by rw [pow_add, pow_one, pow_add, pow_one, eval₂_mul, eval₂_pow]
instance eval₂.is_semiring_hom : is_semiring_hom (eval₂ f g) :=
{ map_zero := eval₂_zero _ _,
map_one := eval₂_one _ _,
map_add := λ p q, eval₂_add _ _,
map_mul := λ p q, eval₂_mul _ _ }
lemma eval₂_comp_left {γ} [comm_semiring γ]
(k : β → γ) [is_semiring_hom k]
(f : α → β) [is_semiring_hom f] (g : σ → β)
(p) : k (eval₂ f g p) = eval₂ (k ∘ f) (k ∘ g) p :=
by apply mv_polynomial.induction_on p; simp [
eval₂_add, is_semiring_hom.map_add k,
eval₂_mul, is_semiring_hom.map_mul k] {contextual := tt}
lemma eval₂_eta (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : eval₂ C X p = p :=
by apply mv_polynomial.induction_on p;
simp [eval₂_add, eval₂_mul] {contextual := tt}
end eval₂
section coeff
def tmp.coe : has_coe_to_fun (mv_polynomial σ α) := by delta mv_polynomial; apply_instance
local attribute [instance] tmp.coe
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : α := p m
lemma ext (p q : mv_polynomial σ α) :
(∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q := ext
@[simp] lemma coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : mv_polynomial σ α) :
coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q := add_apply
@[simp] lemma coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (0 : mv_polynomial σ α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : mv_polynomial σ α) = 0 := rfl
instance coeff.is_add_monoid_hom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
is_add_monoid_hom (coeff m : mv_polynomial σ α → α) :=
{ map_add := coeff_add m,
map_zero := coeff_zero m }
lemma coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : finset X) (f : X → mv_polynomial σ α) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (s.sum f) = s.sum (λ x, coeff m (f x)) :=
(finset.sum_hom _).symm
lemma monic_monomial_eq (m) : monomial m (1:α) = (m.prod $ λn e, X n ^ e : mv_polynomial σ α) :=
by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp] lemma coeff_monomial (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : mv_polynomial σ α) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
single_apply
@[simp] lemma coeff_C (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : mv_polynomial σ α) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
single_apply
lemma coeff_X [decidable_eq β] (i : β) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : mv_polynomial β α) = if finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 :=
begin
have := coeff_monomial m (finsupp.single i k) (1:α),
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1:α) (finsupp.single i k) _ _ _,
C_1, one_mul, finsupp.prod_single_index] at this,
exact pow_zero _
end
@[simp] lemma coeff_C_mul (m) (a : α) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p :=
begin
rw [mul_def, C, monomial],
simp only [sum_single_index, zero_mul, single_zero, zero_add, sum_zero],
convert sum_apply,
simp only [single_apply, finsupp.sum],
rw finset.sum_eq_single m,
{ rw if_pos rfl, refl },
{ intros m' hm' H, apply if_neg, exact H },
{ intros hm, rw if_pos rfl, rw not_mem_support_iff at hm, simp [hm] }
end
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_X (m) (i : σ) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
coeff (m + single i 1) (p * X i) = coeff m p :=
begin
rw [mul_def, X, monomial],
simp only [sum_single_index, mul_one, single_zero, mul_zero],
convert sum_apply,
simp only [single_apply, finsupp.sum],
rw finset.sum_eq_single m,
{ rw if_pos rfl, refl },
{ intros m' hm' H, apply if_neg, intro h, apply H, ext j,
let c : σ →₀ ℕ → (σ → ℕ) := λ f, f, replace h := congr_arg c h, simpa [c] using congr_fun h j },
{ intros hm, rw if_pos rfl, rw not_mem_support_iff at hm, simp [hm] }
end
lemma coeff_mul_X' (m) (i : σ) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
coeff m (p * X i) = if i ∈ m.support then coeff (m - single i 1) p else 0 :=
begin
split_ifs with h h,
{ conv_rhs {rw ← coeff_mul_X _ i},
congr' 1, ext j,
by_cases hj : i = j,
{ subst j, simp only [nat_sub_apply, add_apply, single_eq_same],
refine (nat.sub_add_cancel _).symm, rw mem_support_iff at h,
exact nat.pos_of_ne_zero h },
{ simp [single_eq_of_ne hj] } },
{ delta coeff, rw ← not_mem_support_iff, intro hm, apply h,
have H := support_mul _ _ hm, simp only [finset.mem_bind] at H,
rcases H with ⟨j, hj, i', hi', H⟩,
delta X monomial at hi', rw mem_support_single at hi', cases hi',
simp * at * }
end
end coeff
section eval
variables {f : σ → α}
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` given a valuation `f` of all the variables -/
def eval (f : σ → α) : mv_polynomial σ α → α := eval₂ id f
@[simp] lemma eval_zero : (0 : mv_polynomial σ α).eval f = 0 := eval₂_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_add : (p + q).eval f = p.eval f + q.eval f := eval₂_add _ _
lemma eval_monomial : (monomial s a).eval f = a * s.prod (λn e, f n ^ e) :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_C : ∀ a, (C a).eval f = a := eval₂_C _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_X : ∀ n, (X n).eval f = f n := eval₂_X _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_mul : (p * q).eval f = p.eval f * q.eval f := eval₂_mul _ _
instance eval.is_semiring_hom : is_semiring_hom (eval f) :=
eval₂.is_semiring_hom _ _
theorem eval_assoc {τ} [decidable_eq τ]
(f : σ → mv_polynomial τ α) (g : τ → α)
(p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
p.eval (eval g ∘ f) = (eval₂ C f p).eval g :=
begin
rw eval₂_comp_left (eval g),
unfold eval, congr; funext a; simp
end
end eval
section map
variables [comm_semiring β] [decidable_eq β]
variables (f : α → β) [is_semiring_hom f]
/-- `map f p` maps a polynomial `p` across a ring hom `f` -/
def map : mv_polynomial σ α → mv_polynomial σ β := eval₂ (C ∘ f) X
@[simp] theorem map_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : α) : map f (monomial s a) = monomial s (f a) :=
(eval₂_monomial _ _).trans monomial_eq.symm
@[simp] theorem map_C : ∀ (a : α), map f (C a : mv_polynomial σ α) = C (f a) := map_monomial _ _
@[simp] theorem map_X : ∀ (n : σ), map f (X n : mv_polynomial σ α) = X n := eval₂_X _ _
@[simp] theorem map_one : map f (1 : mv_polynomial σ α) = 1 := eval₂_one _ _
@[simp] theorem map_add (p q : mv_polynomial σ α) :
map f (p + q) = map f p + map f q := eval₂_add _ _
@[simp] theorem map_mul (p q : mv_polynomial σ α) :
map f (p * q) = map f p * map f q := eval₂_mul _ _
instance map.is_semiring_hom :
is_semiring_hom (map f : mv_polynomial σ α → mv_polynomial σ β) :=
eval₂.is_semiring_hom _ _
theorem map_id : ∀ (p : mv_polynomial σ α), map id p = p := eval₂_eta
theorem map_map [comm_semiring γ] [decidable_eq γ]
(g : β → γ) [is_semiring_hom g]
(p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
map g (map f p) = map (g ∘ f) p :=
(eval₂_comp_left (map g) (C ∘ f) X p).trans $
by congr; funext a; simp
theorem eval₂_eq_eval_map (g : σ → β) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
p.eval₂ f g = (map f p).eval g :=
begin
unfold map eval,
rw eval₂_comp_left (eval₂ id g),
congr; funext a; simp
end
lemma eval₂_comp_right {γ} [comm_semiring γ]
(k : β → γ) [is_semiring_hom k]
(f : α → β) [is_semiring_hom f] (g : σ → β)
(p) : k (eval₂ f g p) = eval₂ k (k ∘ g) (map f p) :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.induction_on p,
{ intro r, rw [eval₂_C, map_C, eval₂_C] },
{ intros p q hp hq, rw [eval₂_add, is_semiring_hom.map_add k, map_add, eval₂_add, hp, hq] },
{ intros p s hp,
rw [eval₂_mul, is_semiring_hom.map_mul k, map_mul, eval₂_mul, map_X, hp, eval₂_X, eval₂_X] }
end
lemma map_eval₂ [decidable_eq γ] [decidable_eq δ]
(f : α → β) [is_semiring_hom f] (g : γ → mv_polynomial δ α) (p : mv_polynomial γ α) :
map f (eval₂ C g p) = eval₂ C (map f ∘ g) (map f p) :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.induction_on p,
{ intro r, rw [eval₂_C, map_C, map_C, eval₂_C] },
{ intros p q hp hq, rw [eval₂_add, map_add, hp, hq, map_add, eval₂_add] },
{ intros p s hp,
rw [eval₂_mul, map_mul, hp, map_mul, map_X, eval₂_mul, eval₂_X, eval₂_X] }
end
lemma coeff_map (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : ∀ (m : σ →₀ ℕ), coeff m (p.map f) = f (coeff m p) :=
begin
apply mv_polynomial.induction_on p; clear p,
{ intros r m, rw [map_C], simp only [coeff_C], split_ifs, {refl}, rw is_semiring_hom.map_zero f },
{ intros p q hp hq m, simp only [hp, hq, map_add, coeff_add], rw is_semiring_hom.map_add f },
{ intros p i hp m, simp only [hp, map_mul, map_X],
simp only [hp, mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X'],
split_ifs, {refl},
rw is_semiring_hom.map_zero f }
end
end map
section degrees
section comm_semiring
def degrees (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : multiset σ :=
p.support.sup (λs:σ →₀ ℕ, s.to_multiset)
lemma degrees_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : α) : degrees (monomial s a) ≤ s.to_multiset :=
finset.sup_le $ assume t h,
begin
have := finsupp.support_single_subset h,
rw [finset.singleton_eq_singleton, finset.mem_singleton] at this,
rw this
end
lemma degrees_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : α) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degrees (monomial s a) = s.to_multiset :=
le_antisymm (degrees_monomial s a) $ finset.le_sup $
by rw [monomial, finsupp.support_single_ne_zero ha,
finset.singleton_eq_singleton, finset.mem_singleton]
lemma degrees_C (a : α) : degrees (C a : mv_polynomial σ α) = 0 :=
multiset.le_zero.1 $ degrees_monomial _ _
lemma degrees_X (n : σ) : degrees (X n : mv_polynomial σ α) ≤ {n} :=
le_trans (degrees_monomial _ _) $ le_of_eq $ to_multiset_single _ _
lemma degrees_zero : degrees (0 : mv_polynomial σ α) = 0 := degrees_C 0
lemma degrees_one : degrees (1 : mv_polynomial σ α) = 0 := degrees_C 1
lemma degrees_add (p q : mv_polynomial σ α) : (p + q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees :=
begin
refine finset.sup_le (assume b hb, _),
cases finset.mem_union.1 (finsupp.support_add hb),
{ exact le_sup_left_of_le (finset.le_sup h) },
{ exact le_sup_right_of_le (finset.le_sup h) },
end
lemma degrees_sum {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] (s : finset ι) (f : ι → mv_polynomial σ α) :
(s.sum f).degrees ≤ s.sup (λi, (f i).degrees) :=
begin
refine s.induction _ _,
{ simp only [finset.sum_empty, finset.sup_empty, degrees_zero], exact le_refl _ },
{ assume i s his ih,
rw [finset.sup_insert, finset.sum_insert his],
exact le_trans (degrees_add _ _) (sup_le_sup_left ih _) }
end
lemma degrees_mul (p q : mv_polynomial σ α) : (p * q).degrees ≤ p.degrees + q.degrees :=
begin
refine finset.sup_le (assume b hb, _),
have := support_mul p q hb,
simp only [finset.mem_bind, finset.singleton_eq_singleton, finset.mem_singleton] at this,
rcases this with ⟨a₁, h₁, a₂, h₂, rfl⟩,
rw [finsupp.to_multiset_add],
exact add_le_add (finset.le_sup h₁) (finset.le_sup h₂)
end
lemma degrees_prod {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] (s : finset ι) (f : ι → mv_polynomial σ α) :
(s.prod f).degrees ≤ s.sum (λi, (f i).degrees) :=
begin
refine s.induction _ _,
{ simp only [finset.prod_empty, finset.sum_empty, degrees_one] },
{ assume i s his ih,
rw [finset.prod_insert his, finset.sum_insert his],
exact le_trans (degrees_mul _ _) (add_le_add_left ih _) }
end
lemma degrees_pow (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
∀(n : ℕ), (p^n).degrees ≤ add_monoid.smul n p.degrees
| 0 := begin rw [pow_zero, degrees_one], exact multiset.zero_le _ end
| (n + 1) := le_trans (degrees_mul _ _) (add_le_add_left (degrees_pow n) _)
end comm_semiring
end degrees
section vars
/-- `vars p` is the set of variables appearing in the polynomial `p` -/
def vars (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : finset σ := p.degrees.to_finset
@[simp] lemma vars_0 : (0 : mv_polynomial σ α).vars = ∅ :=
by rw [vars, degrees_zero, multiset.to_finset_zero]
@[simp] lemma vars_monomial (h : a ≠ 0) : (monomial s a).vars = s.support :=
by rw [vars, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ h, finsupp.to_finset_to_multiset]
@[simp] lemma vars_C : (C a : mv_polynomial σ α).vars = ∅ :=
by rw [vars, degrees_C, multiset.to_finset_zero]
@[simp] lemma vars_X (h : 0 ≠ (1 : α)) : (X n : mv_polynomial σ α).vars = {n} :=
by rw [X, vars_monomial h.symm, finsupp.support_single_ne_zero zero_ne_one.symm]
end vars
section degree_of
/-- `degree_of n p` gives the highest power of X_n that appears in `p` -/
def degree_of (n : σ) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : ℕ := p.degrees.count n
end degree_of
section total_degree
/-- `total_degree p` gives the maximum |s| over the monomials X^s in `p` -/
def total_degree (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : ℕ := p.support.sup (λs, s.sum $ λn e, e)
lemma total_degree_eq (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
p.total_degree = p.support.sup (λm, m.to_multiset.card) :=
begin
rw [total_degree],
congr, funext m,
exact (finsupp.card_to_multiset _).symm
end
lemma total_degree_le_degrees_card (p : mv_polynomial σ α) :
p.total_degree ≤ p.degrees.card :=
begin
rw [total_degree_eq],
exact finset.sup_le (assume s hs, multiset.card_le_of_le $ finset.le_sup hs)
end
lemma total_degree_C (a : α) : (C a : mv_polynomial σ α).total_degree = 0 :=
nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $ finset.sup_le $ assume n hn,
have _ := finsupp.support_single_subset hn,
begin
rw [finset.singleton_eq_singleton, finset.mem_singleton] at this,
subst this,
exact le_refl _
end
lemma total_degree_zero : (0 : mv_polynomial σ α).total_degree = 0 :=
by rw [← C_0]; exact total_degree_C (0 : α)
lemma total_degree_one : (1 : mv_polynomial σ α).total_degree = 0 :=
total_degree_C (1 : α)
lemma total_degree_add (a b : mv_polynomial σ α) :
(a + b).total_degree ≤ max a.total_degree b.total_degree :=
finset.sup_le $ assume n hn,
have _ := finsupp.support_add hn,
begin
rcases finset.mem_union.1 this,
{ exact le_max_left_of_le (finset.le_sup h) },
{ exact le_max_right_of_le (finset.le_sup h) }
end
lemma total_degree_mul (a b : mv_polynomial σ α) :
(a * b).total_degree ≤ a.total_degree + b.total_degree :=
finset.sup_le $ assume n hn,
have _ := finsupp.support_mul a b hn,
begin
simp only [finset.mem_bind, finset.mem_singleton, finset.singleton_eq_singleton] at this,
rcases this with ⟨a₁, h₁, a₂, h₂, rfl⟩,
rw [finsupp.sum_add_index],
{ exact add_le_add (finset.le_sup h₁) (finset.le_sup h₂) },
{ assume a, refl },
{ assume a b₁ b₂, refl }
end
lemma total_degree_list_prod :
∀(s : list (mv_polynomial σ α)), s.prod.total_degree ≤ (s.map mv_polynomial.total_degree).sum
| [] := by rw [@list.prod_nil (mv_polynomial σ α) _, total_degree_one]; refl
| (p :: ps) :=
begin
rw [@list.prod_cons (mv_polynomial σ α) _, list.map, list.sum_cons],
exact le_trans (total_degree_mul _ _) (add_le_add_left (total_degree_list_prod ps) _)
end
lemma total_degree_multiset_prod (s : multiset (mv_polynomial σ α)) :
s.prod.total_degree ≤ (s.map mv_polynomial.total_degree).sum :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on s (assume l, _),
rw [multiset.quot_mk_to_coe, multiset.coe_prod, multiset.coe_map, multiset.coe_sum],
exact total_degree_list_prod l
end
lemma total_degree_finset_prod {ι : Type*}
(s : finset ι) (f : ι → mv_polynomial σ α) :
(s.prod f).total_degree ≤ s.sum (λi, (f i).total_degree) :=
begin
refine le_trans (total_degree_multiset_prod _) _,
rw [multiset.map_map],
refl
end
end total_degree
end comm_semiring
section comm_ring
variable [comm_ring α]
variables {p q : mv_polynomial σ α}
instance : ring (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.to_ring
instance : comm_ring (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.to_comm_ring
instance : has_scalar α (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.to_has_scalar
instance : module α (mv_polynomial σ α) := finsupp.to_module _ α
instance C.is_ring_hom : is_ring_hom (C : α → mv_polynomial σ α) :=
by apply is_ring_hom.of_semiring
variables (σ a a')
lemma C_sub : (C (a - a') : mv_polynomial σ α) = C a - C a' := is_ring_hom.map_sub _
@[simp] lemma C_neg : (C (-a) : mv_polynomial σ α) = -C a := is_ring_hom.map_neg _
@[simp] lemma coeff_sub (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : mv_polynomial σ α) :
coeff m (p - q) = coeff m p - coeff m q := finsupp.sub_apply
instance coeff.is_add_group_hom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
is_add_group_hom (coeff m : mv_polynomial σ α → α) :=
⟨coeff_add m⟩
variables {σ} (p)
theorem C_mul' : mv_polynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
begin
apply finsupp.induction p,
{ exact (mul_zero $ mv_polynomial.C a).trans (@smul_zero α (mv_polynomial σ α) _ _ _ a).symm },
intros p b f haf hb0 ih,
rw [mul_add, ih, @smul_add α (mv_polynomial σ α) _ _ _ a], congr' 1,
rw [finsupp.mul_def, finsupp.smul_single, mv_polynomial.C, mv_polynomial.monomial],
rw [finsupp.sum_single_index, finsupp.sum_single_index, zero_add, smul_eq_mul],
{ rw [mul_zero, finsupp.single_zero] },
{ rw finsupp.sum_single_index,
all_goals { rw [zero_mul, finsupp.single_zero] } }
end
lemma smul_eq_C_mul (p : mv_polynomial σ α) (a : α) : a • p = C a * p :=
begin
rw [← finsupp.sum_single p, @finsupp.smul_sum (σ →₀ ℕ) α α, finsupp.mul_sum],
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (assume n _, _),
simp only [finsupp.smul_single],
exact C_mul_monomial.symm
end
@[simp] lemma smul_eval (x) (p : mv_polynomial σ α) (s) : (s • p).eval x = s * p.eval x :=
by rw [smul_eq_C_mul, eval_mul, eval_C]
section degrees
lemma degrees_neg [comm_ring α] (p : mv_polynomial σ α) : (- p).degrees = p.degrees :=
by rw [degrees, finsupp.support_neg]; refl
lemma degrees_sub [comm_ring α] (p q : mv_polynomial σ α) :
(p - q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees :=
le_trans (degrees_add p (-q)) $ by rw [degrees_neg]
end degrees
section eval₂
variables [comm_ring β]
variables (f : α → β) [is_ring_hom f] (g : σ → β)
instance eval₂.is_ring_hom : is_ring_hom (eval₂ f g) :=
by apply is_ring_hom.of_semiring
lemma eval₂_sub : (p - q).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f g - q.eval₂ f g := is_ring_hom.map_sub _
@[simp] lemma eval₂_neg : (-p).eval₂ f g = -(p.eval₂ f g) := is_ring_hom.map_neg _
lemma hom_C (f : mv_polynomial σ ℤ → β) [is_ring_hom f] (n : ℤ) : f (C n) = (n : β) :=
congr_fun (int.eq_cast' (f ∘ C)) n
/-- A ring homomorphism f : Z[X_1, X_2, ...] -> R
is determined by the evaluations f(X_1), f(X_2), ... -/
@[simp] lemma eval₂_hom_X {α : Type u} [decidable_eq α] (c : ℤ → β) [is_ring_hom c]
(f : mv_polynomial α ℤ → β) [is_ring_hom f] (x : mv_polynomial α ℤ) :
eval₂ c (f ∘ X) x = f x :=
mv_polynomial.induction_on x
(λ n, by { rw [hom_C f, eval₂_C, int.eq_cast' c], refl })
(λ p q hp hq, by { rw [eval₂_add, hp, hq], exact (is_ring_hom.map_add f).symm })
(λ p n hp, by { rw [eval₂_mul, eval₂_X, hp], exact (is_ring_hom.map_mul f).symm })
end eval₂
section eval
variables (f : σ → α)
instance eval.is_ring_hom : is_ring_hom (eval f) := eval₂.is_ring_hom _ _
lemma eval_sub : (p - q).eval f = p.eval f - q.eval f := is_ring_hom.map_sub _
@[simp] lemma eval_neg : (-p).eval f = -(p.eval f) := is_ring_hom.map_neg _
end eval
section map
variables [decidable_eq β] [comm_ring β]
variables (f : α → β) [is_ring_hom f]
instance map.is_ring_hom : is_ring_hom (map f : mv_polynomial σ α → mv_polynomial σ β) :=
eval₂.is_ring_hom _ _
lemma map_sub : (p - q).map f = p.map f - q.map f := is_ring_hom.map_sub _
@[simp] lemma map_neg : (-p).map f = -(p.map f) := is_ring_hom.map_neg _
end map
end comm_ring
section rename
variables {α} [comm_semiring α] [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] [decidable_eq γ] [decidable_eq δ]
def rename (f : β → γ) : mv_polynomial β α → mv_polynomial γ α :=
eval₂ C (X ∘ f)
instance rename.is_semiring_hom (f : β → γ) :
is_semiring_hom (rename f : mv_polynomial β α → mv_polynomial γ α) :=
by unfold rename; apply_instance
@[simp] lemma rename_C (f : β → γ) (a : α) : rename f (C a) = C a :=
eval₂_C _ _ _
@[simp] lemma rename_X (f : β → γ) (b : β) : rename f (X b : mv_polynomial β α) = X (f b) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
@[simp] lemma rename_zero (f : β → γ) :
rename f (0 : mv_polynomial β α) = 0 :=
eval₂_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma rename_one (f : β → γ) :
rename f (1 : mv_polynomial β α) = 1 :=
eval₂_one _ _
@[simp] lemma rename_add (f : β → γ) (p q : mv_polynomial β α) :
rename f (p + q) = rename f p + rename f q :=
eval₂_add _ _
@[simp] lemma rename_sub {α} [comm_ring α] [decidable_eq α]
(f : β → γ) (p q : mv_polynomial β α) :
rename f (p - q) = rename f p - rename f q :=
eval₂_sub _ _ _
@[simp] lemma rename_mul (f : β → γ) (p q : mv_polynomial β α) :
rename f (p * q) = rename f p * rename f q :=
eval₂_mul _ _
@[simp] lemma rename_pow (f : β → γ) (p : mv_polynomial β α) (n : ℕ) :
rename f (p^n) = (rename f p)^n :=
eval₂_pow _ _
lemma map_rename [comm_semiring β] (f : α → β) [is_semiring_hom f]
(g : γ → δ) (p : mv_polynomial γ α) :
map f (rename g p) = rename g (map f p) :=
mv_polynomial.induction_on p
(λ a, by simp)
(λ p q hp hq, by simp [hp, hq])
(λ p n hp, by simp [hp])
@[simp] lemma rename_rename (f : β → γ) (g : γ → δ) (p : mv_polynomial β α) :
rename g (rename f p) = rename (g ∘ f) p :=
show rename g (eval₂ C (X ∘ f) p) = _,
by simp only [eval₂_comp_left (rename g) C (X ∘ f) p, (∘), rename_C, rename_X]; refl
@[simp] lemma rename_id (p : mv_polynomial β α) : rename id p = p :=
eval₂_eta p
lemma rename_monomial (f : β → γ) (p : β →₀ ℕ) (a : α) :
rename f (monomial p a) = monomial (p.map_domain f) a :=
begin
rw [rename, eval₂_monomial, monomial_eq, finsupp.prod_map_domain_index],
{ exact assume n, pow_zero _ },
{ exact assume n i₁ i₂, pow_add _ _ _ }
end
lemma rename_eq (f : β → γ) (p : mv_polynomial β α) :
rename f p = finsupp.map_domain (finsupp.map_domain f) p :=
begin
simp only [rename, eval₂, finsupp.map_domain],
congr, ext s a : 2,
rw [← monomial, monomial_eq, finsupp.prod_sum_index],
congr, ext n i : 2,
rw [finsupp.prod_single_index],
exact pow_zero _,
exact assume a, pow_zero _,
exact assume a b c, pow_add _ _ _
end
lemma injective_rename (f : β → γ) (hf : function.injective f) :
function.injective (rename f : mv_polynomial β α → mv_polynomial γ α) :=
have (rename f : mv_polynomial β α → mv_polynomial γ α) =
finsupp.map_domain (finsupp.map_domain f) := funext (rename_eq f),
begin
rw this,
exact finsupp.injective_map_domain (finsupp.injective_map_domain hf)
end
lemma total_degree_rename_le (f : β → γ) (p : mv_polynomial β α) :
(p.rename f).total_degree ≤ p.total_degree :=
finset.sup_le $ assume b,
begin
assume h,
rw rename_eq at h,
have h' := finsupp.map_domain_support h,
rcases finset.mem_image.1 h' with ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩,
rw finsupp.sum_map_domain_index,
exact le_trans (le_refl _) (finset.le_sup hs),
exact assume _, rfl,
exact assume _ _ _, rfl
end
end rename
lemma eval₂_cast_comp {β : Type u} {γ : Type v} [decidable_eq β] [decidable_eq γ] (f : γ → β)
{α : Type w} [comm_ring α] (c : ℤ → α) [is_ring_hom c] (g : β → α) (x : mv_polynomial γ ℤ) :
eval₂ c (g ∘ f) x = eval₂ c g (rename f x) :=
mv_polynomial.induction_on x
(λ n, by simp only [eval₂_C, rename_C])
(λ p q hp hq, by simp only [hp, hq, rename, eval₂_add])
(λ p n hp, by simp only [hp, rename, eval₂_X, eval₂_mul])
instance rename.is_ring_hom
{α} [comm_ring α] [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] [decidable_eq γ] (f : β → γ) :
is_ring_hom (rename f : mv_polynomial β α → mv_polynomial γ α) :=
@is_ring_hom.of_semiring (mv_polynomial β α) (mv_polynomial γ α) _ _ (rename f)
(rename.is_semiring_hom f)
section equiv
variables (α) [comm_ring α]
variables [decidable_eq β] [decidable_eq γ] [decidable_eq δ]
def pempty_ring_equiv : mv_polynomial pempty α ≃r α :=
{ to_fun := mv_polynomial.eval₂ id $ pempty.elim,
inv_fun := C,
left_inv := is_id _ (by apply_instance) (assume a, by rw [eval₂_C]; refl) (assume a, a.elim),
right_inv := λ r, eval₂_C _ _ _,
hom := eval₂.is_ring_hom _ _ }
def punit_ring_equiv : mv_polynomial punit α ≃r polynomial α :=
{ to_fun := eval₂ polynomial.C (λu:punit, polynomial.X),
inv_fun := polynomial.eval₂ mv_polynomial.C (X punit.star),
left_inv :=
begin
refine is_id _ _ _ _,
apply is_semiring_hom.comp (eval₂ polynomial.C (λu:punit, polynomial.X)) _; apply_instance,
{ assume a, rw [eval₂_C, polynomial.eval₂_C] },
{ rintros ⟨⟩, rw [eval₂_X, polynomial.eval₂_X] }
end,
right_inv := assume p, polynomial.induction_on p
(assume a, by rw [polynomial.eval₂_C, mv_polynomial.eval₂_C])
(assume p q hp hq, by rw [polynomial.eval₂_add, mv_polynomial.eval₂_add, hp, hq])
(assume p n hp,
by rw [polynomial.eval₂_mul, polynomial.eval₂_pow, polynomial.eval₂_X, polynomial.eval₂_C,
eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_pow, eval₂_X]),
hom := eval₂.is_ring_hom _ _ }
def ring_equiv_of_equiv (e : β ≃ γ) : mv_polynomial β α ≃r mv_polynomial γ α :=
{ to_fun := rename e,
inv_fun := rename e.symm,
left_inv := λ p, by simp only [rename_rename, (∘), e.symm_apply_apply]; exact rename_id p,
right_inv := λ p, by simp only [rename_rename, (∘), e.apply_symm_apply]; exact rename_id p,
hom := rename.is_ring_hom e }
def ring_equiv_congr [comm_ring γ] (e : α ≃r γ) : mv_polynomial β α ≃r mv_polynomial β γ :=
{ to_fun := map e.to_fun,
inv_fun := map e.symm.to_fun,
left_inv := assume p,
have (e.symm.to_equiv.to_fun ∘ e.to_equiv.to_fun) = id,
{ ext a, exact e.to_equiv.symm_apply_apply a },
by simp only [map_map, this, map_id],
right_inv := assume p,
have (e.to_equiv.to_fun ∘ e.symm.to_equiv.to_fun) = id,
{ ext a, exact e.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply a },
by simp only [map_map, this, map_id],
hom := map.is_ring_hom e.to_fun }
section
variables (β γ δ)
instance ring_on_sum : ring (mv_polynomial (β ⊕ γ) α) := by apply_instance
instance ring_on_iter : ring (mv_polynomial β (mv_polynomial γ α)) := by apply_instance
def sum_to_iter : mv_polynomial (β ⊕ γ) α → mv_polynomial β (mv_polynomial γ α) :=
eval₂ (C ∘ C) (λbc, sum.rec_on bc X (C ∘ X))
instance is_semiring_hom_C_C :
is_semiring_hom (C ∘ C : α → mv_polynomial β (mv_polynomial γ α)) :=
@is_semiring_hom.comp _ _ _ _ C mv_polynomial.is_semiring_hom _ _ C mv_polynomial.is_semiring_hom
instance is_semiring_hom_sum_to_iter : is_semiring_hom (sum_to_iter α β γ) :=
eval₂.is_semiring_hom _ _
lemma sum_to_iter_C (a : α) : sum_to_iter α β γ (C a) = C (C a) :=
eval₂_C _ _ a
lemma sum_to_iter_Xl (b : β) : sum_to_iter α β γ (X (sum.inl b)) = X b :=
eval₂_X _ _ (sum.inl b)
lemma sum_to_iter_Xr (c : γ) : sum_to_iter α β γ (X (sum.inr c)) = C (X c) :=
eval₂_X _ _ (sum.inr c)
def iter_to_sum : mv_polynomial β (mv_polynomial γ α) → mv_polynomial (β ⊕ γ) α :=
eval₂ (eval₂ C (X ∘ sum.inr)) (X ∘ sum.inl)
section
instance is_semiring_hom_iter_to_sum : is_semiring_hom (iter_to_sum α β γ) :=
eval₂.is_semiring_hom _ _
end
lemma iter_to_sum_C_C (a : α) : iter_to_sum α β γ (C (C a)) = C a :=
eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (C a)) (eval₂_C _ _ _)
lemma iter_to_sum_X (b : β) : iter_to_sum α β γ (X b) = X (sum.inl b) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
lemma iter_to_sum_C_X (c : γ) : iter_to_sum α β γ (C (X c)) = X (sum.inr c) :=
eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (X c)) (eval₂_X _ _ _)
def mv_polynomial_equiv_mv_polynomial [comm_ring δ]
(f : mv_polynomial β α → mv_polynomial γ δ) (hf : is_semiring_hom f)
(g : mv_polynomial γ δ → mv_polynomial β α) (hg : is_semiring_hom g)
(hfgC : ∀a, f (g (C a)) = C a)
(hfgX : ∀n, f (g (X n)) = X n)
(hgfC : ∀a, g (f (C a)) = C a)
(hgfX : ∀n, g (f (X n)) = X n) :
mv_polynomial β α ≃r mv_polynomial γ δ :=
{ to_fun := f, inv_fun := g,
left_inv := is_id _ (is_semiring_hom.comp _ _) hgfC hgfX,
right_inv := is_id _ (is_semiring_hom.comp _ _) hfgC hfgX,
hom := is_ring_hom.of_semiring f }
def sum_ring_equiv : mv_polynomial (β ⊕ γ) α ≃r mv_polynomial β (mv_polynomial γ α) :=
begin
apply @mv_polynomial_equiv_mv_polynomial α (β ⊕ γ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(sum_to_iter α β γ) _ (iter_to_sum α β γ) _,
{ assume p,
apply @hom_eq_hom _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ p,
apply_instance,
{ apply @is_semiring_hom.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
apply_instance,
apply @is_semiring_hom.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
apply_instance,
{ apply @mv_polynomial.is_semiring_hom },
{ apply mv_polynomial.is_semiring_hom_iter_to_sum α β γ },
{ apply mv_polynomial.is_semiring_hom_sum_to_iter α β γ } },
{ apply mv_polynomial.is_semiring_hom },
{ assume a, rw [iter_to_sum_C_C α β γ, sum_to_iter_C α β γ] },
{ assume c, rw [iter_to_sum_C_X α β γ, sum_to_iter_Xr α β γ] } },
{ assume b, rw [iter_to_sum_X α β γ, sum_to_iter_Xl α β γ] },
{ assume a, rw [sum_to_iter_C α β γ, iter_to_sum_C_C α β γ] },
{ assume n, cases n with b c,
{ rw [sum_to_iter_Xl, iter_to_sum_X] },
{ rw [sum_to_iter_Xr, iter_to_sum_C_X] } },
{ apply mv_polynomial.is_semiring_hom_sum_to_iter α β γ },
{ apply mv_polynomial.is_semiring_hom_iter_to_sum α β γ }
end
instance option_ring : ring (mv_polynomial (option β) α) :=
mv_polynomial.ring
instance polynomial_ring : ring (polynomial (mv_polynomial β α)) :=
@comm_ring.to_ring _ polynomial.comm_ring
instance polynomial_ring2 : ring (mv_polynomial β (polynomial α)) :=
by apply_instance
def option_equiv_left : mv_polynomial (option β) α ≃r polynomial (mv_polynomial β α) :=
(ring_equiv_of_equiv α $ (equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit β).trans (equiv.sum_comm _ _)).trans $
(sum_ring_equiv α _ _).trans $
punit_ring_equiv _
def option_equiv_right : mv_polynomial (option β) α ≃r mv_polynomial β (polynomial α) :=
(ring_equiv_of_equiv α $ equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit.{0} β).trans $
(sum_ring_equiv α β unit).trans $
ring_equiv_congr (mv_polynomial unit α) (punit_ring_equiv α)
end
end equiv
end mv_polynomial
|
4427f19a7fd73025ce3071f43f0aa1f30a3aee97 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/control/fold.lean | 487b7193192d238f553859ca4368c7669f7e4240 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,032 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Sean Leather
-/
import algebra.group.opposite
import algebra.free_monoid.basic
import control.traversable.instances
import control.traversable.lemmas
import category_theory.endomorphism
import category_theory.types
import category_theory.category.Kleisli
/-!
# List folds generalized to `traversable`
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Informally, we can think of `foldl` as a special case of `traverse` where we do not care about the
reconstructed data structure and, in a state monad, we care about the final state.
The obvious way to define `foldl` would be to use the state monad but it
is nicer to reason about a more abstract interface with `fold_map` as a
primitive and `fold_map_hom` as a defining property.
```
def fold_map {α ω} [has_one ω] [has_mul ω] (f : α → ω) : t α → ω := ...
lemma fold_map_hom (α β)
[monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β)
(g : γ → α) (x : t γ) :
f (fold_map g x) = fold_map (f ∘ g) x :=
...
```
`fold_map` uses a monoid ω to accumulate a value for every element of
a data structure and `fold_map_hom` uses a monoid homomorphism to
substitute the monoid used by `fold_map`. The two are sufficient to
define `foldl`, `foldr` and `to_list`. `to_list` permits the
formulation of specifications in terms of operations on lists.
Each fold function can be defined using a specialized
monoid. `to_list` uses a free monoid represented as a list with
concatenation while `foldl` uses endofunctions together with function
composition.
The definition through monoids uses `traverse` together with the
applicative functor `const m` (where `m` is the monoid). As an
implementation, `const` guarantees that no resource is spent on
reconstructing the structure during traversal.
A special class could be defined for `foldable`, similarly to Haskell,
but the author cannot think of instances of `foldable` that are not also
`traversable`.
-/
universes u v
open ulift category_theory mul_opposite
namespace monoid
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [monad m]
variables {α β : Type u}
/--
For a list, foldl f x [y₀,y₁] reduces as follows:
```
calc foldl f x [y₀,y₁]
= foldl f (f x y₀) [y₁] : rfl
... = foldl f (f (f x y₀) y₁) [] : rfl
... = f (f x y₀) y₁ : rfl
```
with
```
f : α → β → α
x : α
[y₀,y₁] : list β
```
We can view the above as a composition of functions:
```
... = f (f x y₀) y₁ : rfl
... = flip f y₁ (flip f y₀ x) : rfl
... = (flip f y₁ ∘ flip f y₀) x : rfl
```
We can use traverse and const to construct this composition:
```
calc const.run (traverse (λ y, const.mk' (flip f y)) [y₀,y₁]) x
= const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*> traverse (λ y, const.mk' (flip f y)) [y₁]) x
... = const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*>
( (::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> traverse (λ y, const.mk' (flip f y)) [] )) x
... = const.run ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀) <*>
( (::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> pure [] )) x
... = const.run ( ((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₁) <*> pure []) ∘
((::) <$> const.mk' (flip f y₀)) ) x
... = const.run ( const.mk' (flip f y₁) ∘ const.mk' (flip f y₀) ) x
... = const.run ( flip f y₁ ∘ flip f y₀ ) x
... = f (f x y₀) y₁
```
And this is how `const` turns a monoid into an applicative functor and
how the monoid of endofunctions define `foldl`.
-/
@[reducible] def foldl (α : Type u) : Type u := (End α)ᵐᵒᵖ
def foldl.mk (f : α → α) : foldl α := op f
def foldl.get (x : foldl α) : α → α := unop x
@[simps] def foldl.of_free_monoid (f : β → α → β) : free_monoid α →* monoid.foldl β :=
{ to_fun := λ xs, op $ flip (list.foldl f) xs.to_list,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := by intros; simp only [free_monoid.to_list_mul, flip, unop_op,
list.foldl_append, op_inj]; refl }
@[reducible] def foldr (α : Type u) : Type u := End α
def foldr.mk (f : α → α) : foldr α := f
def foldr.get (x : foldr α) : α → α := x
@[simps] def foldr.of_free_monoid (f : α → β → β) : free_monoid α →* monoid.foldr β :=
{ to_fun := λ xs, flip (list.foldr f) xs.to_list,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ xs ys, funext $ λ z, list.foldr_append _ _ _ _ }
@[reducible] def mfoldl (m : Type u → Type u) [monad m] (α : Type u) : Type u :=
mul_opposite $ End $ Kleisli.mk m α
def mfoldl.mk (f : α → m α) : mfoldl m α := op f
def mfoldl.get (x : mfoldl m α) : α → m α := unop x
@[simps] def mfoldl.of_free_monoid [is_lawful_monad m] (f : β → α → m β) :
free_monoid α →* monoid.mfoldl m β :=
{ to_fun := λ xs, op $ flip (list.mfoldl f) xs.to_list,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := by intros; apply unop_injective; ext; apply list.mfoldl_append }
@[reducible] def mfoldr (m : Type u → Type u) [monad m] (α : Type u) : Type u :=
End $ Kleisli.mk m α
def mfoldr.mk (f : α → m α) : mfoldr m α := f
def mfoldr.get (x : mfoldr m α) : α → m α := x
@[simps] def mfoldr.of_free_monoid [is_lawful_monad m] (f : α → β → m β) :
free_monoid α →* monoid.mfoldr m β :=
{ to_fun := λ xs, flip (list.mfoldr f) xs.to_list,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := by intros; ext; apply list.mfoldr_append }
end monoid
namespace traversable
open monoid functor
section defs
variables {α β : Type u} {t : Type u → Type u} [traversable t]
def fold_map {α ω} [has_one ω] [has_mul ω] (f : α → ω) : t α → ω :=
traverse (const.mk' ∘ f)
def foldl (f : α → β → α) (x : α) (xs : t β) : α :=
(fold_map (foldl.mk ∘ flip f) xs).get x
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (x : β) (xs : t α) : β :=
(fold_map (foldr.mk ∘ f) xs).get x
/--
Conceptually, `to_list` collects all the elements of a collection
in a list. This idea is formalized by
`lemma to_list_spec (x : t α) : to_list x = fold_map free_monoid.mk x`.
The definition of `to_list` is based on `foldl` and `list.cons` for
speed. It is faster than using `fold_map free_monoid.mk` because, by
using `foldl` and `list.cons`, each insertion is done in constant
time. As a consequence, `to_list` performs in linear.
On the other hand, `fold_map free_monoid.mk` creates a singleton list
around each element and concatenates all the resulting lists. In
`xs ++ ys`, concatenation takes a time proportional to `length xs`. Since
the order in which concatenation is evaluated is unspecified, nothing
prevents each element of the traversable to be appended at the end
`xs ++ [x]` which would yield a `O(n²)` run time. -/
def to_list : t α → list α :=
list.reverse ∘ foldl (flip list.cons) []
def length (xs : t α) : ℕ :=
down $ foldl (λ l _, up $ l.down + 1) (up 0) xs
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [monad m]
def mfoldl (f : α → β → m α) (x : α) (xs : t β) : m α :=
(fold_map (mfoldl.mk ∘ flip f) xs).get x
def mfoldr (f : α → β → m β) (x : β) (xs : t α) : m β :=
(fold_map (mfoldr.mk ∘ f) xs).get x
end defs
section applicative_transformation
variables {α β γ : Type u}
open function (hiding const)
def map_fold [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β) :
applicative_transformation (const α) (const β) :=
{ app := λ x, f,
preserves_seq' := by { intros, simp only [f.map_mul, (<*>)], },
preserves_pure' := by { intros, simp only [f.map_one, pure] } }
lemma free.map_eq_map (f : α → β) (xs : list α) :
f <$> xs = (free_monoid.map f (free_monoid.of_list xs)).to_list := rfl
lemma foldl.unop_of_free_monoid (f : β → α → β) (xs : free_monoid α) (a : β) :
unop (foldl.of_free_monoid f xs) a = list.foldl f a xs.to_list := rfl
variables (m : Type u → Type u) [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m]
variables {t : Type u → Type u} [traversable t] [is_lawful_traversable t]
open is_lawful_traversable
lemma fold_map_hom [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β)
(g : γ → α) (x : t γ) :
f (fold_map g x) = fold_map (f ∘ g) x :=
calc f (fold_map g x)
= f (traverse (const.mk' ∘ g) x) : rfl
... = (map_fold f).app _ (traverse (const.mk' ∘ g) x) : rfl
... = traverse ((map_fold f).app _ ∘ (const.mk' ∘ g)) x :
naturality (map_fold f) _ _
... = fold_map (f ∘ g) x : rfl
lemma fold_map_hom_free
[monoid β] (f : free_monoid α →* β) (x : t α) :
f (fold_map free_monoid.of x) = fold_map (f ∘ free_monoid.of) x :=
fold_map_hom f _ x
end applicative_transformation
section equalities
open is_lawful_traversable list (cons)
variables {α β γ : Type u}
variables {t : Type u → Type u} [traversable t] [is_lawful_traversable t]
@[simp]
lemma foldl.of_free_monoid_comp_of (f : α → β → α) :
foldl.of_free_monoid f ∘ free_monoid.of = foldl.mk ∘ flip f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma foldr.of_free_monoid_comp_of (f : β → α → α) :
foldr.of_free_monoid f ∘ free_monoid.of = foldr.mk ∘ f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma mfoldl.of_free_monoid_comp_of {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m] (f : α → β → m α) :
mfoldl.of_free_monoid f ∘ free_monoid.of = mfoldl.mk ∘ flip f :=
by { ext1 x, simp [(∘), mfoldl.of_free_monoid, mfoldl.mk, flip], refl }
@[simp]
lemma mfoldr.of_free_monoid_comp_of {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m] (f : β → α → m α) :
mfoldr.of_free_monoid f ∘ free_monoid.of = mfoldr.mk ∘ f :=
by { ext, simp [(∘), mfoldr.of_free_monoid, mfoldr.mk, flip] }
lemma to_list_spec (xs : t α) :
to_list xs = free_monoid.to_list (fold_map free_monoid.of xs) :=
eq.symm $
calc free_monoid.to_list (fold_map free_monoid.of xs)
= free_monoid.to_list (fold_map free_monoid.of xs).reverse.reverse
: by simp only [list.reverse_reverse]
... = free_monoid.to_list (list.foldr cons [] (fold_map free_monoid.of xs).reverse).reverse
: by simp only [list.foldr_eta]
... = (unop (foldl.of_free_monoid (flip cons) (fold_map free_monoid.of xs)) []).reverse
: by simp [flip, list.foldr_reverse, foldl.of_free_monoid, unop_op]
... = to_list xs : begin
rw fold_map_hom_free (foldl.of_free_monoid (flip $ @cons α)),
{ simp only [to_list, foldl, list.reverse_inj, foldl.get,
foldl.of_free_monoid_comp_of] },
{ apply_instance }
end
lemma fold_map_map [monoid γ] (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (xs : t α) :
fold_map g (f <$> xs) = fold_map (g ∘ f) xs :=
by simp only [fold_map,traverse_map]
lemma foldl_to_list (f : α → β → α) (xs : t β) (x : α) :
foldl f x xs = list.foldl f x (to_list xs) :=
begin
rw [← free_monoid.to_list_of_list (to_list xs), ← foldl.unop_of_free_monoid],
simp only [foldl, to_list_spec, fold_map_hom_free,
foldl.of_free_monoid_comp_of, foldl.get, free_monoid.of_list_to_list]
end
lemma foldr_to_list (f : α → β → β) (xs : t α) (x : β) :
foldr f x xs = list.foldr f x (to_list xs) :=
begin
change _ = foldr.of_free_monoid _ (free_monoid.of_list $ to_list xs) _,
rw [to_list_spec, foldr, foldr.get, free_monoid.of_list_to_list, fold_map_hom_free,
foldr.of_free_monoid_comp_of]
end
/-
-/
lemma to_list_map (f : α → β) (xs : t α) :
to_list (f <$> xs) = f <$> to_list xs :=
by simp only [to_list_spec, free.map_eq_map, fold_map_hom, fold_map_map,
free_monoid.of_list_to_list, free_monoid.map_of, (∘)]
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
foldl f a (g <$> l) = foldl (λ x y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by simp only [foldl, fold_map_map, (∘), flip]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
foldr f a (g <$> l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by simp only [foldr, fold_map_map, (∘), flip]
@[simp] theorem to_list_eq_self {xs : list α} : to_list xs = xs :=
begin
simp only [to_list_spec, fold_map, traverse],
induction xs,
case list.nil { refl },
case list.cons : _ _ ih { conv_rhs { rw [← ih] }, refl }
end
theorem length_to_list {xs : t α} : length xs = list.length (to_list xs) :=
begin
unfold length,
rw foldl_to_list,
generalize : to_list xs = ys,
let f := λ (n : ℕ) (a : α), n + 1,
transitivity list.foldl f 0 ys,
{ generalize : 0 = n,
induction ys with _ _ ih generalizing n,
{ simp only [list.foldl_nil] },
{ simp only [list.foldl, ih (n+1)] } },
{ induction ys with _ tl ih,
{ simp only [list.length, list.foldl_nil] },
{ simp only [list.foldl, list.length],
rw [← ih],
exact tl.foldl_hom (λx, x+1) f f 0 (λ n x, rfl) } }
end
variables {m : Type u → Type u} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m]
lemma mfoldl_to_list {f : α → β → m α} {x : α} {xs : t β} :
mfoldl f x xs = list.mfoldl f x (to_list xs) :=
calc mfoldl f x xs = unop (mfoldl.of_free_monoid f (free_monoid.of_list $ to_list xs)) x :
by simp only [mfoldl, to_list_spec, fold_map_hom_free (mfoldl.of_free_monoid f),
mfoldl.of_free_monoid_comp_of, mfoldl.get, free_monoid.of_list_to_list]
... = list.mfoldl f x (to_list xs) : by simp [mfoldl.of_free_monoid, unop_op, flip]
lemma mfoldr_to_list (f : α → β → m β) (x : β) (xs : t α) :
mfoldr f x xs = list.mfoldr f x (to_list xs) :=
begin
change _ = mfoldr.of_free_monoid f (free_monoid.of_list $ to_list xs) x,
simp only [mfoldr, to_list_spec, fold_map_hom_free (mfoldr.of_free_monoid f),
mfoldr.of_free_monoid_comp_of, mfoldr.get, free_monoid.of_list_to_list]
end
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → m α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
mfoldl f a (g <$> l) = mfoldl (λ x y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by simp only [mfoldl, fold_map_map, (∘), flip]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → m α) (a : α) (l : t β) :
mfoldr f a (g <$> l) = mfoldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by simp only [mfoldr, fold_map_map, (∘), flip]
end equalities
end traversable
|
aca55305733344a89ef911357233094fd1f72014 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/types/int/basic.hlean | d07d1fe5bd03cc5c4bd9307ca6c2d9373a1ea490 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,812 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jeremy Avigad
The integers, with addition, multiplication, and subtraction. The representation of the integers is
chosen to compute efficiently.
To faciliate proving things about these operations, we show that the integers are a quotient of
ℕ × ℕ with the usual equivalence relation, ≡, and functions
abstr : ℕ × ℕ → ℤ
repr : ℤ → ℕ × ℕ
satisfying:
abstr_repr (a : ℤ) : abstr (repr a) = a
repr_abstr (p : ℕ × ℕ) : repr (abstr p) ≡ p
abstr_eq (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : p ≡ q → abstr p = abstr q
For example, to "lift" statements about add to statements about padd, we need to prove the
following:
repr_add (a b : ℤ) : repr (a + b) = padd (repr a) (repr b)
padd_congr (p p' q q' : ℕ × ℕ) (H1 : p ≡ p') (H2 : q ≡ q') : padd p q ≡ p' q'
-/
import types.nat.sub algebra.relation types.prod
open prod relation nat
open decidable binary
open algebra eq lift
/- the type of integers -/
inductive int : Type :=
| of_nat : nat → int
| neg_succ_of_nat : nat → int
notation `ℤ` := int
definition int.of_num [coercion] [reducible] [constructor] (n : num) : ℤ :=
int.of_nat (nat.of_num n)
namespace int
attribute int.of_nat [coercion]
notation `-[1+ ` n `]` := int.neg_succ_of_nat n -- for pretty-printing output
protected definition prio : num := num.pred nat.prio
definition int_has_zero [instance] [priority int.prio] : has_zero int :=
has_zero.mk (of_nat 0)
definition int_has_one [instance] [priority int.prio] : has_one int :=
has_one.mk (of_nat 1)
theorem of_nat_zero : of_nat (0:nat) = (0:int) :=
rfl
theorem of_nat_one : of_nat (1:nat) = (1:int) :=
rfl
/- definitions of basic functions -/
definition neg_of_nat : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 := 0
| (succ m) := -[1+ m]
definition sub_nat_nat (m n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
match (n - m : nat) with
| 0 := of_nat (m - n) -- m ≥ n
| (succ k) := -[1+ k] -- m < n, and n - m = succ k
end
protected definition neg (a : ℤ) : ℤ :=
int.cases_on a neg_of_nat succ
protected definition add : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := _root_.add m n
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := sub_nat_nat m (succ n)
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := sub_nat_nat n (succ m)
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := neg_of_nat (succ m + succ n)
protected definition mul : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := m * n
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := neg_of_nat (m * succ n)
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := neg_of_nat (succ m * n)
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := succ m * succ n
/- notation -/
definition int_has_add [instance] [priority int.prio] : has_add int := has_add.mk int.add
definition int_has_neg [instance] [priority int.prio] : has_neg int := has_neg.mk int.neg
definition int_has_mul [instance] [priority int.prio] : has_mul int := has_mul.mk int.mul
lemma mul_of_nat_of_nat (m n : nat) : of_nat m * of_nat n = of_nat (m * n) :=
rfl
lemma mul_of_nat_neg_succ_of_nat (m n : nat) : of_nat m * -[1+ n] = neg_of_nat (m * succ n) :=
rfl
lemma mul_neg_succ_of_nat_of_nat (m n : nat) : -[1+ m] * of_nat n = neg_of_nat (succ m * n) :=
rfl
lemma mul_neg_succ_of_nat_neg_succ_of_nat (m n : nat) : -[1+ m] * -[1+ n] = succ m * succ n :=
rfl
/- some basic functions and properties -/
theorem of_nat.inj {m n : ℕ} (H : of_nat m = of_nat n) : m = n :=
down (int.no_confusion H imp.id)
theorem eq_of_of_nat_eq_of_nat {m n : ℕ} (H : of_nat m = of_nat n) : m = n :=
of_nat.inj H
theorem of_nat_eq_of_nat_iff (m n : ℕ) : of_nat m = of_nat n ↔ m = n :=
iff.intro of_nat.inj !ap
theorem neg_succ_of_nat.inj {m n : ℕ} (H : neg_succ_of_nat m = neg_succ_of_nat n) : m = n :=
down (int.no_confusion H imp.id)
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_eq (n : ℕ) : -[1+ n] = -(n + 1) := rfl
private definition has_decidable_eq₂ : Π (a b : ℤ), decidable (a = b)
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff
(nat.has_decidable_eq m n) (iff.symm (of_nat_eq_of_nat_iff m n))
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := inr (by contradiction)
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := inr (by contradiction)
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := if H : m = n then
inl (ap neg_succ_of_nat H) else inr (not.mto neg_succ_of_nat.inj H)
definition has_decidable_eq [instance] [priority int.prio] : decidable_eq ℤ := has_decidable_eq₂
theorem of_nat_add (n m : nat) : of_nat (n + m) = of_nat n + of_nat m := rfl
theorem of_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : of_nat (succ n) = of_nat n + 1 := rfl
theorem of_nat_mul (n m : ℕ) : of_nat (n * m) = of_nat n * of_nat m := rfl
theorem sub_nat_nat_of_ge {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≥ n) : sub_nat_nat m n = of_nat (m - n) :=
show sub_nat_nat m n = nat.cases_on 0 (m -[nat] n) _, from (sub_eq_zero_of_le H) ▸ rfl
section
local attribute sub_nat_nat [reducible]
theorem sub_nat_nat_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (H : m < n) : sub_nat_nat m n = -[1+ pred (n - m)] :=
have H1 : n - m = succ (pred (n - m)), from inverse (succ_pred_of_pos (nat.sub_pos_of_lt H)),
show sub_nat_nat m n = nat.cases_on (succ (nat.pred (n - m))) (m -[nat] n) _, from H1 ▸ rfl
end
definition nat_abs (a : ℤ) : ℕ := int.cases_on a id succ
theorem nat_abs_of_nat (n : ℕ) : nat_abs n = n := rfl
theorem eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero : Π {a : ℤ}, nat_abs a = 0 → a = 0
| (of_nat m) H := ap of_nat H
| -[1+ m'] H := absurd H !succ_ne_zero
theorem nat_abs_zero : nat_abs (0:int) = (0:nat) :=
rfl
theorem nat_abs_one : nat_abs (1:int) = (1:nat) :=
rfl
/- int is a quotient of ordered pairs of natural numbers -/
protected definition equiv (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : Type₀ := pr1 p + pr2 q = pr2 p + pr1 q
local infix ≡ := int.equiv
protected theorem equiv.refl [refl] {p : ℕ × ℕ} : p ≡ p := !add.comm
protected theorem equiv.symm [symm] {p q : ℕ × ℕ} (H : p ≡ q) : q ≡ p :=
calc
pr1 q + pr2 p = pr2 p + pr1 q : by rewrite add.comm
... = pr1 p + pr2 q : H⁻¹
... = pr2 q + pr1 p : by rewrite add.comm
protected theorem equiv.trans [trans] {p q r : ℕ × ℕ} (H1 : p ≡ q) (H2 : q ≡ r) : p ≡ r :=
add.right_cancel (calc
pr1 p + pr2 r + pr2 q = pr1 p + pr2 q + pr2 r : by rewrite add.right_comm
... = pr2 p + pr1 q + pr2 r : {H1}
... = pr2 p + (pr1 q + pr2 r) : by rewrite add.assoc
... = pr2 p + (pr2 q + pr1 r) : {H2}
... = pr2 p + pr2 q + pr1 r : by rewrite add.assoc
... = pr2 p + pr1 r + pr2 q : by rewrite add.right_comm)
protected theorem equiv_equiv : is_equivalence int.equiv :=
is_equivalence.mk @equiv.refl @equiv.symm @equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_cases {p q : ℕ × ℕ} (H : p ≡ q) :
(pr1 p ≥ pr2 p × pr1 q ≥ pr2 q) ⊎ (pr1 p < pr2 p × pr1 q < pr2 q) :=
sum.elim (@le_sum_gt _ _ (pr2 p) (pr1 p))
(suppose pr1 p ≥ pr2 p,
have pr2 p + pr1 q ≥ pr2 p + pr2 q, from H ▸ add_le_add_right this (pr2 q),
sum.inl (pair `pr1 p ≥ pr2 p` (le_of_add_le_add_left this)))
(suppose H₁ : pr1 p < pr2 p,
have pr2 p + pr1 q < pr2 p + pr2 q, from H ▸ add_lt_add_right H₁ (pr2 q),
sum.inr (pair H₁ (lt_of_add_lt_add_left this)))
protected theorem equiv_of_eq {p q : ℕ × ℕ} (H : p = q) : p ≡ q := H ▸ equiv.refl
/- the representation and abstraction functions -/
definition abstr (a : ℕ × ℕ) : ℤ := sub_nat_nat (pr1 a) (pr2 a)
theorem abstr_of_ge {p : ℕ × ℕ} (H : pr1 p ≥ pr2 p) : abstr p = of_nat (pr1 p - pr2 p) :=
sub_nat_nat_of_ge H
theorem abstr_of_lt {p : ℕ × ℕ} (H : pr1 p < pr2 p) :
abstr p = -[1+ pred (pr2 p - pr1 p)] :=
sub_nat_nat_of_lt H
definition repr : ℤ → ℕ × ℕ
| (of_nat m) := (m, 0)
| -[1+ m] := (0, succ m)
theorem abstr_repr : Π (a : ℤ), abstr (repr a) = a
| (of_nat m) := (sub_nat_nat_of_ge (zero_le m))
| -[1+ m] := rfl
theorem repr_sub_nat_nat (m n : ℕ) : repr (sub_nat_nat m n) ≡ (m, n) :=
nat.lt_ge_by_cases
(take H : m < n,
have H1 : repr (sub_nat_nat m n) = (0, n - m), by
rewrite [sub_nat_nat_of_lt H, -(succ_pred_of_pos (nat.sub_pos_of_lt H))],
H1⁻¹ ▸ (!zero_add ⬝ (nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_lt H))⁻¹))
(take H : m ≥ n,
have H1 : repr (sub_nat_nat m n) = (m - n, 0), from sub_nat_nat_of_ge H ▸ rfl,
H1⁻¹ ▸ ((nat.sub_add_cancel H) ⬝ !zero_add⁻¹))
theorem repr_abstr (p : ℕ × ℕ) : repr (abstr p) ≡ p :=
!prod.eta ▸ !repr_sub_nat_nat
theorem abstr_eq {p q : ℕ × ℕ} (Hequiv : p ≡ q) : abstr p = abstr q :=
sum.elim (int.equiv_cases Hequiv)
(prod.rec (assume (Hp : pr1 p ≥ pr2 p) (Hq : pr1 q ≥ pr2 q),
have H : pr1 p - pr2 p = pr1 q - pr2 q, from
calc pr1 p - pr2 p
= pr1 p + pr2 q - pr2 q - pr2 p : by rewrite nat.add_sub_cancel
... = pr2 p + pr1 q - pr2 q - pr2 p : Hequiv
... = pr2 p + (pr1 q - pr2 q) - pr2 p : nat.add_sub_assoc Hq
... = pr1 q - pr2 q + pr2 p - pr2 p : by rewrite add.comm
... = pr1 q - pr2 q : by rewrite nat.add_sub_cancel,
abstr_of_ge Hp ⬝ (H ▸ rfl) ⬝ (abstr_of_ge Hq)⁻¹))
(prod.rec (assume (Hp : pr1 p < pr2 p) (Hq : pr1 q < pr2 q),
have H : pr2 p - pr1 p = pr2 q - pr1 q, from
calc pr2 p - pr1 p
= pr2 p + pr1 q - pr1 q - pr1 p : by rewrite nat.add_sub_cancel
... = pr1 p + pr2 q - pr1 q - pr1 p : Hequiv
... = pr1 p + (pr2 q - pr1 q) - pr1 p : nat.add_sub_assoc (le_of_lt Hq)
... = pr2 q - pr1 q + pr1 p - pr1 p : by rewrite add.comm
... = pr2 q - pr1 q : by rewrite nat.add_sub_cancel,
abstr_of_lt Hp ⬝ (H ▸ rfl) ⬝ (abstr_of_lt Hq)⁻¹))
theorem equiv_iff (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : (p ≡ q) ↔ (abstr p = abstr q) :=
iff.intro abstr_eq (assume H, equiv.trans (H ▸ equiv.symm (repr_abstr p)) (repr_abstr q))
theorem equiv_iff3 (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : (p ≡ q) ↔ ((p ≡ p) × (q ≡ q) × (abstr p = abstr q)) :=
iff.trans !equiv_iff (iff.symm
(iff.trans (prod_iff_right !equiv.refl) (prod_iff_right !equiv.refl)))
theorem eq_abstr_of_equiv_repr {a : ℤ} {p : ℕ × ℕ} (Hequiv : repr a ≡ p) : a = abstr p :=
!abstr_repr⁻¹ ⬝ abstr_eq Hequiv
theorem eq_of_repr_equiv_repr {a b : ℤ} (H : repr a ≡ repr b) : a = b :=
eq_abstr_of_equiv_repr H ⬝ !abstr_repr
section
local attribute abstr [reducible]
local attribute dist [reducible]
theorem nat_abs_abstr : Π (p : ℕ × ℕ), nat_abs (abstr p) = dist (pr1 p) (pr2 p)
| (m, n) := nat.lt_ge_by_cases
(assume H : m < n,
calc
nat_abs (abstr (m, n)) = nat_abs (-[1+ pred (n - m)]) : int.abstr_of_lt H
... = n - m : succ_pred_of_pos (nat.sub_pos_of_lt H)
... = dist m n : dist_eq_sub_of_le (le_of_lt H))
(assume H : m ≥ n, (abstr_of_ge H)⁻¹ ▸ (dist_eq_sub_of_ge H)⁻¹)
end
theorem cases_of_nat_succ (a : ℤ) : (Σn : ℕ, a = of_nat n) ⊎ (Σn : ℕ, a = - (of_nat (succ n))) :=
int.cases_on a (take m, sum.inl (sigma.mk _ rfl)) (take m, sum.inr (sigma.mk _ rfl))
theorem cases_of_nat (a : ℤ) : (Σn : ℕ, a = of_nat n) ⊎ (Σn : ℕ, a = - of_nat n) :=
sum.imp_right (sigma.rec (take n, (sigma.mk _))) !cases_of_nat_succ
theorem by_cases_of_nat {P : ℤ → Type} (a : ℤ)
(H1 : Πn : ℕ, P (of_nat n)) (H2 : Πn : ℕ, P (- of_nat n)) :
P a :=
sum.elim (cases_of_nat a)
(assume H, obtain (n : ℕ) (H3 : a = n), from H, H3⁻¹ ▸ H1 n)
(assume H, obtain (n : ℕ) (H3 : a = -n), from H, H3⁻¹ ▸ H2 n)
theorem by_cases_of_nat_succ {P : ℤ → Type} (a : ℤ)
(H1 : Πn : ℕ, P (of_nat n)) (H2 : Πn : ℕ, P (- of_nat (succ n))) :
P a :=
sum.elim (cases_of_nat_succ a)
(assume H, obtain (n : ℕ) (H3 : a = n), from H, H3⁻¹ ▸ H1 n)
(assume H, obtain (n : ℕ) (H3 : a = -(succ n)), from H, H3⁻¹ ▸ H2 n)
/-
int is a ring
-/
/- addition -/
definition padd (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ := (pr1 p + pr1 q, pr2 p + pr2 q)
theorem repr_add : Π (a b : ℤ), repr (add a b) ≡ padd (repr a) (repr b)
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := !equiv.refl
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] :=
begin
change repr (sub_nat_nat m (succ n)) ≡ (m + 0, 0 + succ n),
rewrite [zero_add, add_zero],
apply repr_sub_nat_nat
end
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) :=
begin
change repr (-[1+ m] + n) ≡ (0 + n, succ m + 0),
rewrite [zero_add, add_zero],
apply repr_sub_nat_nat
end
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := !repr_sub_nat_nat
theorem padd_congr {p p' q q' : ℕ × ℕ} (Ha : p ≡ p') (Hb : q ≡ q') : padd p q ≡ padd p' q' :=
calc pr1 p + pr1 q + (pr2 p' + pr2 q')
= pr1 p + pr2 p' + (pr1 q + pr2 q') : add.comm4
... = pr2 p + pr1 p' + (pr1 q + pr2 q') : {Ha}
... = pr2 p + pr1 p' + (pr2 q + pr1 q') : {Hb}
... = pr2 p + pr2 q + (pr1 p' + pr1 q') : add.comm4
theorem padd_comm (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : padd p q = padd q p :=
calc (pr1 p + pr1 q, pr2 p + pr2 q)
= (pr1 q + pr1 p, pr2 p + pr2 q) : by rewrite add.comm
... = (pr1 q + pr1 p, pr2 q + pr2 p) : by rewrite (add.comm (pr2 p) (pr2 q))
theorem padd_assoc (p q r : ℕ × ℕ) : padd (padd p q) r = padd p (padd q r) :=
calc (pr1 p + pr1 q + pr1 r, pr2 p + pr2 q + pr2 r)
= (pr1 p + (pr1 q + pr1 r), pr2 p + pr2 q + pr2 r) : by rewrite add.assoc
... = (pr1 p + (pr1 q + pr1 r), pr2 p + (pr2 q + pr2 r)) : by rewrite add.assoc
protected theorem add_comm (a b : ℤ) : a + b = b + a :=
eq_of_repr_equiv_repr (equiv.trans !repr_add
(equiv.symm (!padd_comm ▸ !repr_add)))
protected theorem add_assoc (a b c : ℤ) : a + b + c = a + (b + c) :=
eq_of_repr_equiv_repr (calc
repr (a + b + c)
≡ padd (repr (a + b)) (repr c) : repr_add
... ≡ padd (padd (repr a) (repr b)) (repr c) : padd_congr !repr_add !equiv.refl
... = padd (repr a) (padd (repr b) (repr c)) : !padd_assoc
... ≡ padd (repr a) (repr (b + c)) : padd_congr !equiv.refl !repr_add
... ≡ repr (a + (b + c)) : repr_add)
protected theorem add_zero : Π (a : ℤ), a + 0 = a := int.rec (λm, rfl) (λm, rfl)
protected theorem zero_add (a : ℤ) : 0 + a = a := !int.add_comm ▸ !int.add_zero
/- negation -/
definition pneg (p : ℕ × ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ := (pr2 p, pr1 p)
-- note: this is =, not just ≡
theorem repr_neg : Π (a : ℤ), repr (- a) = pneg (repr a)
| 0 := rfl
| (succ m) := rfl
| -[1+ m] := rfl
theorem pneg_congr {p p' : ℕ × ℕ} (H : p ≡ p') : pneg p ≡ pneg p' := inverse H
theorem pneg_pneg (p : ℕ × ℕ) : pneg (pneg p) = p := !prod.eta
theorem nat_abs_neg (a : ℤ) : nat_abs (-a) = nat_abs a :=
calc
nat_abs (-a) = nat_abs (abstr (repr (-a))) : abstr_repr
... = nat_abs (abstr (pneg (repr a))) : repr_neg
... = dist (pr1 (pneg (repr a))) (pr2 (pneg (repr a))) : nat_abs_abstr
... = dist (pr2 (pneg (repr a))) (pr1 (pneg (repr a))) : dist.comm
... = nat_abs (abstr (repr a)) : nat_abs_abstr
... = nat_abs a : abstr_repr
theorem padd_pneg (p : ℕ × ℕ) : padd p (pneg p) ≡ (0, 0) :=
show pr1 p + pr2 p + 0 = pr2 p + pr1 p + 0,
by rewrite [nat.add_comm (pr1 p)]
theorem padd_padd_pneg (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : padd (padd p q) (pneg q) ≡ p :=
calc pr1 p + pr1 q + pr2 q + pr2 p
= pr1 p + (pr1 q + pr2 q) + pr2 p : add.assoc
... = pr1 p + (pr1 q + pr2 q + pr2 p) : add.assoc
... = pr1 p + (pr2 q + pr1 q + pr2 p) : add.comm
... = pr1 p + (pr2 q + pr2 p + pr1 q) : add.right_comm
... = pr1 p + (pr2 p + pr2 q + pr1 q) : add.comm
... = pr2 p + pr2 q + pr1 q + pr1 p : add.comm
protected theorem add_left_inv (a : ℤ) : -a + a = 0 :=
have H : repr (-a + a) ≡ repr 0, from
calc
repr (-a + a) ≡ padd (repr (neg a)) (repr a) : repr_add
... = padd (pneg (repr a)) (repr a) : repr_neg
... ≡ repr 0 : padd_pneg,
eq_of_repr_equiv_repr H
/- nat abs -/
definition pabs (p : ℕ × ℕ) : ℕ := dist (pr1 p) (pr2 p)
theorem pabs_congr {p q : ℕ × ℕ} (H : p ≡ q) : pabs p = pabs q :=
calc
pabs p = nat_abs (abstr p) : nat_abs_abstr
... = nat_abs (abstr q) : abstr_eq H
... = pabs q : nat_abs_abstr
theorem nat_abs_eq_pabs_repr (a : ℤ) : nat_abs a = pabs (repr a) :=
calc
nat_abs a = nat_abs (abstr (repr a)) : abstr_repr
... = pabs (repr a) : nat_abs_abstr
theorem nat_abs_add_le (a b : ℤ) : nat_abs (a + b) ≤ nat_abs a + nat_abs b :=
calc
nat_abs (a + b) = pabs (repr (a + b)) : nat_abs_eq_pabs_repr
... = pabs (padd (repr a) (repr b)) : pabs_congr !repr_add
... ≤ pabs (repr a) + pabs (repr b) : dist_add_add_le_add_dist_dist
... = pabs (repr a) + nat_abs b : nat_abs_eq_pabs_repr
... = nat_abs a + nat_abs b : nat_abs_eq_pabs_repr
theorem nat_abs_neg_of_nat (n : nat) : nat_abs (neg_of_nat n) = n :=
begin cases n, reflexivity, reflexivity end
section
local attribute nat_abs [reducible]
theorem nat_abs_mul : Π (a b : ℤ), nat_abs (a * b) = (nat_abs a) * (nat_abs b)
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := rfl
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := by rewrite [mul_of_nat_neg_succ_of_nat, nat_abs_neg_of_nat]
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := by rewrite [mul_neg_succ_of_nat_of_nat, nat_abs_neg_of_nat]
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := rfl
end
/- multiplication -/
definition pmul (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ :=
(pr1 p * pr1 q + pr2 p * pr2 q, pr1 p * pr2 q + pr2 p * pr1 q)
theorem repr_neg_of_nat (m : ℕ) : repr (neg_of_nat m) = (0, m) :=
nat.cases_on m rfl (take m', rfl)
-- note: we have =, not just ≡
theorem repr_mul : Π (a b : ℤ), repr (a * b) = pmul (repr a) (repr b)
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := calc
(m * n + 0 * 0, m * 0 + 0) = (m * n + 0 * 0, m * 0 + 0 * n) : by rewrite *zero_mul
| (of_nat m) -[1+ n] := calc
repr ((m : int) * -[1+ n]) = (m * 0 + 0, m * succ n + 0 * 0) : repr_neg_of_nat
... = (m * 0 + 0 * succ n, m * succ n + 0 * 0) : by rewrite *zero_mul
| -[1+ m] (of_nat n) := calc
repr (-[1+ m] * (n:int)) = (0 + succ m * 0, succ m * n) : repr_neg_of_nat
... = (0 + succ m * 0, 0 + succ m * n) : nat.zero_add
... = (0 * n + succ m * 0, 0 + succ m * n) : by rewrite zero_mul
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := calc
(succ m * succ n, 0) = (succ m * succ n, 0 * succ n) : by rewrite zero_mul
... = (0 + succ m * succ n, 0 * succ n) : nat.zero_add
theorem equiv_mul_prep {xa ya xb yb xn yn xm ym : ℕ}
(H1 : xa + yb = ya + xb) (H2 : xn + ym = yn + xm)
: xa*xn+ya*yn+(xb*ym+yb*xm) = xa*yn+ya*xn+(xb*xm+yb*ym) :=
nat.add_right_cancel (calc
xa*xn+ya*yn + (xb*ym+yb*xm) + (yb*xn+xb*yn + (xb*xn+yb*yn))
= xa*xn+ya*yn + (yb*xn+xb*yn) + (xb*ym+yb*xm + (xb*xn+yb*yn)) : by rewrite add.comm4
... = xa*xn+ya*yn + (yb*xn+xb*yn) + (xb*xn+yb*yn + (xb*ym+yb*xm)) : by rewrite {xb*ym+yb*xm +_}nat.add_comm
... = xa*xn+yb*xn + (ya*yn+xb*yn) + (xb*xn+xb*ym + (yb*yn+yb*xm)) : by exact !congr_arg2 !add.comm4 !add.comm4
... = ya*xn+xb*xn + (xa*yn+yb*yn) + (xb*yn+xb*xm + (yb*xn+yb*ym)) : by rewrite[-+left_distrib,-+right_distrib]; exact H1 ▸ H2 ▸ rfl
... = ya*xn+xa*yn + (xb*xn+yb*yn) + (xb*yn+yb*xn + (xb*xm+yb*ym)) : by exact !congr_arg2 !add.comm4 !add.comm4
... = xa*yn+ya*xn + (xb*xn+yb*yn) + (xb*yn+yb*xn + (xb*xm+yb*ym)) : by rewrite {xa*yn + _}nat.add_comm
... = xa*yn+ya*xn + (xb*xn+yb*yn) + (yb*xn+xb*yn + (xb*xm+yb*ym)) : by rewrite {xb*yn + _}nat.add_comm
... = xa*yn+ya*xn + (yb*xn+xb*yn) + (xb*xn+yb*yn + (xb*xm+yb*ym)) : by rewrite (!add.comm4)
... = xa*yn+ya*xn + (yb*xn+xb*yn) + (xb*xm+yb*ym + (xb*xn+yb*yn)) : by rewrite {xb*xn+yb*yn + _}nat.add_comm
... = xa*yn+ya*xn + (xb*xm+yb*ym) + (yb*xn+xb*yn + (xb*xn+yb*yn)) : by rewrite add.comm4)
theorem pmul_congr {p p' q q' : ℕ × ℕ} : p ≡ p' → q ≡ q' → pmul p q ≡ pmul p' q' := equiv_mul_prep
theorem pmul_comm (p q : ℕ × ℕ) : pmul p q = pmul q p :=
show (_,_) = (_,_),
begin
congruence,
{ congruence, repeat rewrite mul.comm },
{ rewrite add.comm, congruence, repeat rewrite mul.comm }
end
protected theorem mul_comm (a b : ℤ) : a * b = b * a :=
eq_of_repr_equiv_repr
((calc
repr (a * b) = pmul (repr a) (repr b) : repr_mul
... = pmul (repr b) (repr a) : pmul_comm
... = repr (b * a) : repr_mul) ▸ !equiv.refl)
private theorem pmul_assoc_prep {p1 p2 q1 q2 r1 r2 : ℕ} :
((p1*q1+p2*q2)*r1+(p1*q2+p2*q1)*r2, (p1*q1+p2*q2)*r2+(p1*q2+p2*q1)*r1) =
(p1*(q1*r1+q2*r2)+p2*(q1*r2+q2*r1), p1*(q1*r2+q2*r1)+p2*(q1*r1+q2*r2)) :=
begin
rewrite [+left_distrib, +right_distrib, *mul.assoc],
rewrite (add.comm4 (p1 * (q1 * r1)) (p2 * (q2 * r1)) (p1 * (q2 * r2)) (p2 * (q1 * r2))),
rewrite (add.comm (p2 * (q2 * r1)) (p2 * (q1 * r2))),
rewrite (add.comm4 (p1 * (q1 * r2)) (p2 * (q2 * r2)) (p1 * (q2 * r1)) (p2 * (q1 * r1))),
rewrite (add.comm (p2 * (q2 * r2)) (p2 * (q1 * r1)))
end
theorem pmul_assoc (p q r: ℕ × ℕ) : pmul (pmul p q) r = pmul p (pmul q r) := pmul_assoc_prep
protected theorem mul_assoc (a b c : ℤ) : (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) :=
eq_of_repr_equiv_repr
((calc
repr (a * b * c) = pmul (repr (a * b)) (repr c) : repr_mul
... = pmul (pmul (repr a) (repr b)) (repr c) : repr_mul
... = pmul (repr a) (pmul (repr b) (repr c)) : pmul_assoc
... = pmul (repr a) (repr (b * c)) : repr_mul
... = repr (a * (b * c)) : repr_mul) ▸ !equiv.refl)
protected theorem mul_one : Π (a : ℤ), a * 1 = a
| (of_nat m) := !int.zero_add -- zero_add happens to be def. = to this thm
| -[1+ m] := !nat.zero_add ▸ rfl
protected theorem one_mul (a : ℤ) : 1 * a = a :=
int.mul_comm a 1 ▸ int.mul_one a
private theorem mul_distrib_prep {a1 a2 b1 b2 c1 c2 : ℕ} :
((a1+b1)*c1+(a2+b2)*c2, (a1+b1)*c2+(a2+b2)*c1) =
(a1*c1+a2*c2+(b1*c1+b2*c2), a1*c2+a2*c1+(b1*c2+b2*c1)) :=
begin
rewrite +right_distrib, congruence,
{rewrite add.comm4},
{rewrite add.comm4}
end
protected theorem right_distrib (a b c : ℤ) : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
eq_of_repr_equiv_repr
(calc
repr ((a + b) * c) = pmul (repr (a + b)) (repr c) : repr_mul
... ≡ pmul (padd (repr a) (repr b)) (repr c) : pmul_congr !repr_add equiv.refl
... = padd (pmul (repr a) (repr c)) (pmul (repr b) (repr c)) : mul_distrib_prep
... = padd (repr (a * c)) (pmul (repr b) (repr c)) : repr_mul
... = padd (repr (a * c)) (repr (b * c)) : repr_mul
... ≡ repr (a * c + b * c) : repr_add)
protected theorem left_distrib (a b c : ℤ) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
calc
a * (b + c) = (b + c) * a : int.mul_comm
... = b * a + c * a : int.right_distrib
... = a * b + c * a : int.mul_comm
... = a * b + a * c : int.mul_comm
protected theorem zero_ne_one : (0 : int) ≠ 1 :=
assume H : 0 = 1, !succ_ne_zero (of_nat.inj H)⁻¹
protected theorem eq_zero_sum_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : a * b = 0) : a = 0 ⊎ b = 0 :=
sum.imp eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero
(eq_zero_sum_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (by rewrite [-nat_abs_mul, H]))
protected definition integral_domain [trans_instance] : integral_domain int :=
⦃integral_domain,
add := int.add,
add_assoc := int.add_assoc,
zero := 0,
zero_add := int.zero_add,
add_zero := int.add_zero,
neg := int.neg,
add_left_inv := int.add_left_inv,
add_comm := int.add_comm,
mul := int.mul,
mul_assoc := int.mul_assoc,
one := 1,
one_mul := int.one_mul,
mul_one := int.mul_one,
left_distrib := int.left_distrib,
right_distrib := int.right_distrib,
mul_comm := int.mul_comm,
zero_ne_one := int.zero_ne_one,
eq_zero_sum_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := @int.eq_zero_sum_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero,
is_set_carrier := is_set_of_decidable_eq⦄
definition int_has_sub [instance] [priority int.prio] : has_sub int :=
has_sub.mk has_sub.sub
definition int_has_dvd [instance] [priority int.prio] : has_dvd int :=
has_dvd.mk has_dvd.dvd
/- additional properties -/
theorem of_nat_sub {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≥ n) : of_nat (m - n) = of_nat m - of_nat n :=
have m - n + n = m, from nat.sub_add_cancel H,
begin
symmetry,
apply sub_eq_of_eq_add,
rewrite [-of_nat_add, this]
end
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_eq' (m : ℕ) : -[1+ m] = -m - 1 :=
by rewrite [neg_succ_of_nat_eq, neg_add]
definition succ (a : ℤ) := a + (succ zero)
definition pred (a : ℤ) := a - (succ zero)
definition nat_succ_eq_int_succ (n : ℕ) : nat.succ n = int.succ n := idp
theorem pred_succ (a : ℤ) : pred (succ a) = a := !sub_add_cancel
theorem succ_pred (a : ℤ) : succ (pred a) = a := !add_sub_cancel
theorem neg_succ (a : ℤ) : -succ a = pred (-a) :=
by rewrite [↑succ,neg_add]
theorem succ_neg_succ (a : ℤ) : succ (-succ a) = -a :=
by rewrite [neg_succ,succ_pred]
theorem neg_pred (a : ℤ) : -pred a = succ (-a) :=
by rewrite [↑pred,neg_sub,sub_eq_add_neg,add.comm]
theorem pred_neg_pred (a : ℤ) : pred (-pred a) = -a :=
by rewrite [neg_pred,pred_succ]
theorem pred_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : pred (nat.succ n) = n := pred_succ n
theorem neg_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : -nat.succ n = pred (-n) := !neg_succ
theorem succ_neg_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : succ (-nat.succ n) = -n := !succ_neg_succ
definition rec_nat_on [unfold 2] {P : ℤ → Type} (z : ℤ) (H0 : P 0)
(Hsucc : Π⦃n : ℕ⦄, P n → P (succ n)) (Hpred : Π⦃n : ℕ⦄, P (-n) → P (-nat.succ n)) : P z :=
int.rec (nat.rec H0 Hsucc) (λn, nat.rec H0 Hpred (nat.succ n)) z
--the only computation rule of rec_nat_on which is not definitional
theorem rec_nat_on_neg {P : ℤ → Type} (n : ℕ) (H0 : P zero)
(Hsucc : Π⦃n : ℕ⦄, P n → P (succ n)) (Hpred : Π⦃n : ℕ⦄, P (-n) → P (-nat.succ n))
: rec_nat_on (-nat.succ n) H0 Hsucc Hpred = Hpred (rec_nat_on (-n) H0 Hsucc Hpred) :=
nat.rec rfl (λn H, rfl) n
end int
|
f1acf11c00542ab0947c6f26fd13dbdfb8f2c3c9 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /tests/lean/beginEndAsMacro.lean | 1a0053bc6dfbd79fd91da7c7d00cf406b65a7972 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 458 | lean | /- ANCHOR: doc -/
open Lean in
macro "begin " ts:tactic,*,? "end"%i : term => do
-- preserve position of the last token, which is used
-- as the error position in case of an unfinished proof
`(by { $[$ts:tactic]* }%$i)
theorem ex1 (x : Nat) : x + 0 = 0 + x :=
begin
rw [Nat.zero_add],
rw [Nat.add_zero],
end
/- ANCHOR_END: doc -/
theorem ex2 (x : Nat) : x + 0 = 0 + x :=
begin
rw [Nat.zero_add]
end -- error should be shown here
|
8dc4eecd0169c17d5fac36a2db4df17ee4c0ff8c | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/let2.lean | e29cd1cbc914b1c65a5c07043486e767baa8a77e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 464 | lean | import logic
definition b :=
let a := true ∧ true,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a,
a := a ∧ a in
a
check b
|
48a7e6918365ebaf8a557ffa05aedd28507ff286 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/deprecated/group.lean | d6cdaa34ce16f75388b9f18f7716e536dd57000e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,464 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.group.type_tags
import algebra.hom.equiv.basic
import algebra.hom.ring
import algebra.hom.units
/-!
# Unbundled monoid and group homomorphisms
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file is deprecated, and is no longer imported by anything in mathlib other than other
deprecated files, and test files. You should not need to import it.
This file defines predicates for unbundled monoid and group homomorphisms. Instead of using
this file, please use `monoid_hom`, defined in `algebra.hom.group`, with notation `→*`, for
morphisms between monoids or groups. For example use `φ : G →* H` to represent a group
homomorphism between multiplicative groups, and `ψ : A →+ B` to represent a group homomorphism
between additive groups.
## Main Definitions
`is_monoid_hom` (deprecated), `is_group_hom` (deprecated)
## Tags
is_group_hom, is_monoid_hom
-/
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- Predicate for maps which preserve an addition. -/
structure is_add_hom {α β : Type*} [has_add α] [has_add β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(map_add [] : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
/-- Predicate for maps which preserve a multiplication. -/
@[to_additive]
structure is_mul_hom {α β : Type*} [has_mul α] [has_mul β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(map_mul [] : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
namespace is_mul_hom
variables [has_mul α] [has_mul β] {γ : Type*} [has_mul γ]
/-- The identity map preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "The identity map preserves addition"]
lemma id : is_mul_hom (id : α → α) := {map_mul := λ _ _, rfl}
/-- The composition of maps which preserve multiplication, also preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "The composition of addition preserving maps also preserves addition"]
lemma comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hf : is_mul_hom f) (hg : is_mul_hom g) : is_mul_hom (g ∘ f) :=
{ map_mul := λ x y, by simp only [function.comp, hf.map_mul, hg.map_mul] }
/-- A product of maps which preserve multiplication,
preserves multiplication when the target is commutative. -/
@[to_additive "A sum of maps which preserves addition, preserves addition when the target
is commutative."]
lemma mul {α β} [semigroup α] [comm_semigroup β]
{f g : α → β} (hf : is_mul_hom f) (hg : is_mul_hom g) :
is_mul_hom (λ a, f a * g a) :=
{ map_mul := λ a b, by simp only [hf.map_mul, hg.map_mul, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm] }
/-- The inverse of a map which preserves multiplication,
preserves multiplication when the target is commutative. -/
@[to_additive "The negation of a map which preserves addition, preserves addition when
the target is commutative."]
lemma inv {α β} [has_mul α] [comm_group β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_mul_hom f) :
is_mul_hom (λ a, (f a)⁻¹) :=
{ map_mul := λ a b, (hf.map_mul a b).symm ▸ mul_inv _ _ }
end is_mul_hom
/-- Predicate for add_monoid homomorphisms (deprecated -- use the bundled `monoid_hom` version). -/
structure is_add_monoid_hom [add_zero_class α] [add_zero_class β] (f : α → β)
extends is_add_hom f : Prop :=
(map_zero [] : f 0 = 0)
/-- Predicate for monoid homomorphisms (deprecated -- use the bundled `monoid_hom` version). -/
@[to_additive]
structure is_monoid_hom [mul_one_class α] [mul_one_class β] (f : α → β)
extends is_mul_hom f : Prop :=
(map_one [] : f 1 = 1)
namespace monoid_hom
variables {M : Type*} {N : Type*} [mM : mul_one_class M] [mN : mul_one_class N]
include mM mN
/-- Interpret a map `f : M → N` as a homomorphism `M →* N`. -/
@[to_additive "Interpret a map `f : M → N` as a homomorphism `M →+ N`."]
def of {f : M → N} (h : is_monoid_hom f) : M →* N :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_one' := h.2,
map_mul' := h.1.1 }
variables {mM mN}
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_of {f : M → N} (hf : is_monoid_hom f) : ⇑ (monoid_hom.of hf) = f :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma is_monoid_hom_coe (f : M →* N) : is_monoid_hom (f : M → N) :=
{ map_mul := f.map_mul,
map_one := f.map_one }
end monoid_hom
namespace mul_equiv
variables {M : Type*} {N : Type*} [mul_one_class M] [mul_one_class N]
/-- A multiplicative isomorphism preserves multiplication (deprecated). -/
@[to_additive "An additive isomorphism preserves addition (deprecated)."]
theorem is_mul_hom (h : M ≃* N) : is_mul_hom h := ⟨h.map_mul⟩
/-- A multiplicative bijection between two monoids is a monoid hom
(deprecated -- use `mul_equiv.to_monoid_hom`). -/
@[to_additive "An additive bijection between two additive monoids is an additive
monoid hom (deprecated). "]
lemma is_monoid_hom (h : M ≃* N) : is_monoid_hom h :=
{ map_mul := h.map_mul,
map_one := h.map_one }
end mul_equiv
namespace is_monoid_hom
variables [mul_one_class α] [mul_one_class β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_monoid_hom f)
/-- A monoid homomorphism preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An additive monoid homomorphism preserves addition."]
lemma map_mul (x y) : f (x * y) = f x * f y :=
hf.map_mul x y
/-- The inverse of a map which preserves multiplication,
preserves multiplication when the target is commutative. -/
@[to_additive "The negation of a map which preserves addition, preserves addition
when the target is commutative."]
lemma inv {α β} [mul_one_class α] [comm_group β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_monoid_hom f) :
is_monoid_hom (λ a, (f a)⁻¹) :=
{ map_one := hf.map_one.symm ▸ inv_one,
map_mul := λ a b, (hf.map_mul a b).symm ▸ mul_inv _ _ }
end is_monoid_hom
/-- A map to a group preserving multiplication is a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "A map to an additive group preserving addition is an additive monoid
homomorphism."]
theorem is_mul_hom.to_is_monoid_hom [mul_one_class α] [group β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_mul_hom f) :
is_monoid_hom f :=
{ map_one := mul_right_eq_self.1 $ by rw [← hf.map_mul, one_mul],
map_mul := hf.map_mul }
namespace is_monoid_hom
variables [mul_one_class α] [mul_one_class β] {f : α → β}
/-- The identity map is a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The identity map is an additive monoid homomorphism."]
lemma id : is_monoid_hom (@id α) := { map_one := rfl, map_mul := λ _ _, rfl }
/-- The composite of two monoid homomorphisms is a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The composite of two additive monoid homomorphisms is an additive monoid
homomorphism."]
lemma comp (hf : is_monoid_hom f) {γ} [mul_one_class γ] {g : β → γ} (hg : is_monoid_hom g) :
is_monoid_hom (g ∘ f) :=
{ map_one := show g _ = 1, by rw [hf.map_one, hg.map_one],
..is_mul_hom.comp hf.to_is_mul_hom hg.to_is_mul_hom }
end is_monoid_hom
namespace is_add_monoid_hom
/-- Left multiplication in a ring is an additive monoid morphism. -/
lemma is_add_monoid_hom_mul_left {γ : Type*} [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring γ] (x : γ) :
is_add_monoid_hom (λ y : γ, x * y) :=
{ map_zero := mul_zero x, map_add := λ y z, mul_add x y z }
/-- Right multiplication in a ring is an additive monoid morphism. -/
lemma is_add_monoid_hom_mul_right {γ : Type*} [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring γ] (x : γ) :
is_add_monoid_hom (λ y : γ, y * x) :=
{ map_zero := zero_mul x, map_add := λ y z, add_mul y z x }
end is_add_monoid_hom
/-- Predicate for additive group homomorphism (deprecated -- use bundled `monoid_hom`). -/
structure is_add_group_hom [add_group α] [add_group β] (f : α → β) extends is_add_hom f : Prop
/-- Predicate for group homomorphisms (deprecated -- use bundled `monoid_hom`). -/
@[to_additive]
structure is_group_hom [group α] [group β] (f : α → β) extends is_mul_hom f : Prop
@[to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.is_group_hom {G H : Type*} {_ : group G} {_ : group H} (f : G →* H) :
is_group_hom (f : G → H) :=
{ map_mul := f.map_mul }
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_equiv.is_group_hom {G H : Type*} {_ : group G} {_ : group H} (h : G ≃* H) :
is_group_hom h := { map_mul := h.map_mul }
/-- Construct `is_group_hom` from its only hypothesis. -/
@[to_additive "Construct `is_add_group_hom` from its only hypothesis."]
lemma is_group_hom.mk' [group α] [group β] {f : α → β} (hf : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
is_group_hom f :=
{ map_mul := hf }
namespace is_group_hom
variables [group α] [group β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_group_hom f)
open is_mul_hom (map_mul)
lemma map_mul : ∀ (x y), f (x * y) = f x * f y := hf.to_is_mul_hom.map_mul
/-- A group homomorphism is a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "An additive group homomorphism is an additive monoid homomorphism."]
lemma to_is_monoid_hom : is_monoid_hom f :=
hf.to_is_mul_hom.to_is_monoid_hom
/-- A group homomorphism sends 1 to 1. -/
@[to_additive "An additive group homomorphism sends 0 to 0."]
lemma map_one : f 1 = 1 := hf.to_is_monoid_hom.map_one
/-- A group homomorphism sends inverses to inverses. -/
@[to_additive "An additive group homomorphism sends negations to negations."]
theorem map_inv (hf : is_group_hom f) (a : α) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left $ by rw [← hf.map_mul, inv_mul_self, hf.map_one]
@[to_additive] lemma map_div (hf : is_group_hom f) (a b : α) : f (a / b) = f a / f b :=
by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, hf.map_mul, hf.map_inv]
/-- The identity is a group homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The identity is an additive group homomorphism."]
lemma id : is_group_hom (@id α) := { map_mul := λ _ _, rfl}
/-- The composition of two group homomorphisms is a group homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "The composition of two additive group homomorphisms is an additive
group homomorphism."]
lemma comp (hf : is_group_hom f) {γ} [group γ] {g : β → γ} (hg : is_group_hom g) :
is_group_hom (g ∘ f) :=
{ ..is_mul_hom.comp hf.to_is_mul_hom hg.to_is_mul_hom }
/-- A group homomorphism is injective iff its kernel is trivial. -/
@[to_additive "An additive group homomorphism is injective if its kernel is trivial."]
lemma injective_iff {f : α → β} (hf : is_group_hom f) :
function.injective f ↔ (∀ a, f a = 1 → a = 1) :=
⟨λ h _, by rw ← hf.map_one; exact @h _ _,
λ h x y hxy, eq_of_div_eq_one $ h _ $ by rwa [hf.map_div, div_eq_one]⟩
/-- The product of group homomorphisms is a group homomorphism if the target is commutative. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of two additive group homomorphisms is an additive group homomorphism
if the target is commutative."]
lemma mul {α β} [group α] [comm_group β]
{f g : α → β} (hf : is_group_hom f) (hg : is_group_hom g) :
is_group_hom (λa, f a * g a) :=
{ map_mul := (hf.to_is_mul_hom.mul hg.to_is_mul_hom).map_mul }
/-- The inverse of a group homomorphism is a group homomorphism if the target is commutative. -/
@[to_additive "The negation of an additive group homomorphism is an additive group homomorphism
if the target is commutative."]
lemma inv {α β} [group α] [comm_group β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_group_hom f) :
is_group_hom (λa, (f a)⁻¹) :=
{ map_mul := hf.to_is_mul_hom.inv.map_mul }
end is_group_hom
namespace ring_hom
/-!
These instances look redundant, because `deprecated.ring` provides `is_ring_hom` for a `→+*`.
Nevertheless these are harmless, and helpful for stripping out dependencies on `deprecated.ring`.
-/
variables {R : Type*} {S : Type*}
section
variables [non_assoc_semiring R] [non_assoc_semiring S]
lemma to_is_monoid_hom (f : R →+* S) : is_monoid_hom f :=
{ map_one := f.map_one,
map_mul := f.map_mul }
lemma to_is_add_monoid_hom (f : R →+* S) : is_add_monoid_hom f :=
{ map_zero := f.map_zero,
map_add := f.map_add }
end
section
variables [ring R] [ring S]
lemma to_is_add_group_hom (f : R →+* S) : is_add_group_hom f :=
{ map_add := f.map_add }
end
end ring_hom
/-- Inversion is a group homomorphism if the group is commutative. -/
@[to_additive neg.is_add_group_hom
"Negation is an `add_group` homomorphism if the `add_group` is commutative."]
lemma inv.is_group_hom [comm_group α] : is_group_hom (has_inv.inv : α → α) :=
{ map_mul := mul_inv }
/-- The difference of two additive group homomorphisms is an additive group
homomorphism if the target is commutative. -/
lemma is_add_group_hom.sub {α β} [add_group α] [add_comm_group β]
{f g : α → β} (hf : is_add_group_hom f) (hg : is_add_group_hom g) :
is_add_group_hom (λa, f a - g a) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
namespace units
variables {M : Type*} {N : Type*} [monoid M] [monoid N]
/-- The group homomorphism on units induced by a multiplicative morphism. -/
@[reducible] def map' {f : M → N} (hf : is_monoid_hom f) : Mˣ →* Nˣ :=
map (monoid_hom.of hf)
@[simp] lemma coe_map' {f : M → N} (hf : is_monoid_hom f) (x : Mˣ) :
↑((map' hf : Mˣ → Nˣ) x) = f x :=
rfl
lemma coe_is_monoid_hom : is_monoid_hom (coe : Mˣ → M) := (coe_hom M).is_monoid_hom_coe
end units
namespace is_unit
variables {M : Type*} {N : Type*} [monoid M] [monoid N] {x : M}
lemma map' {f : M → N} (hf :is_monoid_hom f) {x : M} (h : is_unit x) :
is_unit (f x) :=
h.map (monoid_hom.of hf)
end is_unit
lemma additive.is_add_hom [has_mul α] [has_mul β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_mul_hom f) :
@is_add_hom (additive α) (additive β) _ _ f :=
{ map_add := is_mul_hom.map_mul hf }
lemma multiplicative.is_mul_hom [has_add α] [has_add β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_add_hom f) :
@is_mul_hom (multiplicative α) (multiplicative β) _ _ f :=
{ map_mul := is_add_hom.map_add hf }
-- defeq abuse
lemma additive.is_add_monoid_hom [mul_one_class α] [mul_one_class β] {f : α → β}
(hf : is_monoid_hom f) : @is_add_monoid_hom (additive α) (additive β) _ _ f :=
{ map_zero := hf.map_one,
..additive.is_add_hom hf.to_is_mul_hom }
lemma multiplicative.is_monoid_hom
[add_zero_class α] [add_zero_class β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_add_monoid_hom f) :
@is_monoid_hom (multiplicative α) (multiplicative β) _ _ f :=
{ map_one := is_add_monoid_hom.map_zero hf,
..multiplicative.is_mul_hom hf.to_is_add_hom }
lemma additive.is_add_group_hom [group α] [group β] {f : α → β} (hf : is_group_hom f) :
@is_add_group_hom (additive α) (additive β) _ _ f :=
{ map_add := hf.to_is_mul_hom.map_mul }
lemma multiplicative.is_group_hom [add_group α] [add_group β] {f : α → β}
(hf : is_add_group_hom f) : @is_group_hom (multiplicative α) (multiplicative β) _ _ f :=
{ map_mul := hf.to_is_add_hom.map_add }
|
25a77dce53d954a9a9777ce2174d39da03d89e97 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /test/conv.lean | 4e02fcca0043364c77dfa4cb975f3331b743cec0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,167 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Keeley Hoek. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Keeley Hoek
-/
import tactic.converter.interactive
import tactic.ring
example : 0 + 0 = 0 :=
begin
conv_lhs {erw [add_zero]}
end
example : 0 + 0 = 0 :=
begin
conv_lhs {simp}
end
example : 0 = 0 + 0 :=
begin
conv_rhs {simp}
end
-- Example with ring discharging the goal
example : 22 + 7 * 4 + 3 * 8 = 0 + 7 * 4 + 46 :=
begin
conv { ring, },
end
-- Example with ring failing to discharge, to normalizing the goal
example : (22 + 7 * 4 + 3 * 8 = 0 + 7 * 4 + 47) = (74 = 75) :=
begin
conv { ring, },
end
-- Example with ring discharging the goal
example (x : ℕ) : 22 + 7 * x + 3 * 8 = 0 + 7 * x + 46 :=
begin
conv { ring, },
end
-- Example with ring failing to discharge, to normalizing the goal
example (x : ℕ) : (22 + 7 * x + 3 * 8 = 0 + 7 * x + 46 + 1)
= (7 * x + 46 = 7 * x + 47) :=
begin
conv { ring, },
end
-- norm_num examples:
example : 22 + 7 * 4 + 3 * 8 = 74 :=
begin
conv { norm_num, },
end
example (x : ℕ) : 22 + 7 * x + 3 * 8 = 7 * x + 46 :=
begin
conv { norm_num, },
end
|
e92a88950af72883b8a5fe5be5c93fe395408543 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/data/qpf/multivariate/basic.lean | cfe55beb50bfd5fa59555fe911bde0b9585f8dc2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,753 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import data.pfunctor.multivariate.basic
universe u
/-!
# Multivariate quotients of polynomial functors.
Basic definition of multivariate QPF. QPFs form a compositional framework
for defining inductive and coinductive types, their quotients and nesting.
The idea is based on building ever larger functors. For instance, we can define
a list using a shape functor:
```lean
inductive list_shape (a b : Type)
| nil : list_shape
| cons : a -> b -> list_shape
```
This shape can itself be decomposed as a sum of product which are themselves
QPFs. It follows that the shape is a QPF and we can take its fixed point
and create the list itself:
```lean
def list (a : Type) := fix list_shape a -- not the actual notation
```
We can continue and define the quotient on permutation of lists and create
the multiset type:
```lean
def multiset (a : Type) := qpf.quot list.perm list a -- not the actual notion
```
And `multiset` is also a QPF. We can then create a novel data type (for Lean):
```lean
inductive tree (a : Type)
| node : a -> multiset tree -> tree
```
An unordered tree. This is currently not supported by Lean because it nests
an inductive type inside of a quotient. We can go further and define
unordered, possibly infinite trees:
```lean
coinductive tree' (a : Type)
| node : a -> multiset tree' -> tree'
```
by using the `cofix` construct. Those options can all be mixed and
matched because they preserve the properties of QPF. The latter example,
`tree'`, combines fixed point, co-fixed point and quotients.
## Related modules
* constructions
* fix
* cofix
* quot
* comp
* sigma / pi
* prj
* const
each proves that some operations on functors preserves the QPF structure
##reference
* [Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon, *Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
open_locale mvfunctor
/--
Multivariate quotients of polynomial functors.
-/
class mvqpf {n : ℕ} (F : typevec.{u} n → Type*) [mvfunctor F] :=
(P : mvpfunctor.{u} n)
(abs : Π {α}, P.obj α → F α)
(repr : Π {α}, F α → P.obj α)
(abs_repr : ∀ {α} (x : F α), abs (repr x) = x)
(abs_map : ∀ {α β} (f : α ⟹ β) (p : P.obj α), abs (f <$$> p) = f <$$> abs p)
namespace mvqpf
variables {n : ℕ} {F : typevec.{u} n → Type*} [mvfunctor F] [q : mvqpf F]
include q
open mvfunctor (liftp liftr)
/-!
### Show that every mvqpf is a lawful mvfunctor.
-/
protected theorem id_map {α : typevec n} (x : F α) : typevec.id <$$> x = x :=
by { rw ←abs_repr x, cases repr x with a f, rw [←abs_map], reflexivity }
@[simp] theorem comp_map {α β γ : typevec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : β ⟹ γ) (x : F α) :
(g ⊚ f) <$$> x = g <$$> f <$$> x :=
by { rw ←abs_repr x, cases repr x with a f, rw [←abs_map, ←abs_map, ←abs_map], reflexivity }
@[priority 100]
instance is_lawful_mvfunctor : is_lawful_mvfunctor F :=
{ id_map := @mvqpf.id_map n F _ _,
comp_map := @comp_map n F _ _ }
/- Lifting predicates and relations -/
theorem liftp_iff {α : typevec n} (p : Π ⦃i⦄, α i → Prop) (x : F α) :
liftp p x ↔ ∃ a f, x = abs ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ ∀ i j, p (f i j) :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨y, hy⟩, cases h : repr y with a f,
use [a, λ i j, (f i j).val], split,
{ rw [←hy, ←abs_repr y, h, ←abs_map], reflexivity },
intros i j, apply (f i j).property },
rintros ⟨a, f, h₀, h₁⟩, dsimp at *,
use abs (⟨a, λ i j, ⟨f i j, h₁ i j⟩⟩),
rw [←abs_map, h₀], reflexivity
end
theorem liftr_iff {α : typevec n} (r : Π ⦃i⦄, α i → α i → Prop) (x y : F α) :
liftr r x y ↔ ∃ a f₀ f₁, x = abs ⟨a, f₀⟩ ∧ y = abs ⟨a, f₁⟩ ∧ ∀ i j, r (f₀ i j) (f₁ i j) :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, xeq, yeq⟩, cases h : repr u with a f,
use [a, λ i j, (f i j).val.fst, λ i j, (f i j).val.snd],
split, { rw [←xeq, ←abs_repr u, h, ←abs_map], refl },
split, { rw [←yeq, ←abs_repr u, h, ←abs_map], refl },
intros i j, exact (f i j).property },
rintros ⟨a, f₀, f₁, xeq, yeq, h⟩,
use abs ⟨a, λ i j, ⟨(f₀ i j, f₁ i j), h i j⟩⟩,
dsimp, split,
{ rw [xeq, ←abs_map], refl },
rw [yeq, ←abs_map], refl
end
open set
open mvfunctor
theorem mem_supp {α : typevec n} (x : F α) (i) (u : α i) :
u ∈ supp x i ↔ ∀ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x → u ∈ f i '' univ :=
begin
rw [supp], dsimp, split,
{ intros h a f haf,
have : liftp (λ i u, u ∈ f i '' univ) x,
{ rw liftp_iff, refine ⟨a, f, haf.symm, _⟩,
intros i u, exact mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _) },
exact h this },
intros h p, rw liftp_iff,
rintros ⟨a, f, xeq, h'⟩,
rcases h a f xeq.symm with ⟨i, _, hi⟩,
rw ←hi, apply h'
end
theorem supp_eq {α : typevec n} {i} (x : F α) :
supp x i = { u | ∀ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x → u ∈ f i '' univ } :=
by ext; apply mem_supp
theorem has_good_supp_iff {α : typevec n} (x : F α) :
(∀ p, liftp p x ↔ ∀ i (u ∈ supp x i), p i u) ↔
∃ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x ∧ ∀ i a' f', abs ⟨a', f'⟩ = x → f i '' univ ⊆ f' i '' univ :=
begin
split,
{ intros h,
have : liftp (supp x) x, by { rw h, introv, exact id, },
rw liftp_iff at this, rcases this with ⟨a, f, xeq, h'⟩,
refine ⟨a, f, xeq.symm, _⟩,
intros a' f' h'',
rintros hu u ⟨j, h₂, hfi⟩,
have hh : u ∈ supp x a', by rw ←hfi; apply h',
refine (mem_supp x _ u).mp hh _ _ hu, },
rintros ⟨a, f, xeq, h⟩ p, rw liftp_iff, split,
{ rintros ⟨a', f', xeq', h'⟩ i u usuppx,
rcases (mem_supp x _ u).mp @usuppx a' f' xeq'.symm with ⟨i, _, f'ieq⟩,
rw ←f'ieq, apply h' },
intro h',
refine ⟨a, f, xeq.symm, _⟩, intros j y,
apply h', rw mem_supp,
intros a' f' xeq',
apply h _ a' f' xeq',
apply mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)
end
variable (q)
/-- A qpf is said to be uniform if every polynomial functor
representing a single value all have the same range. -/
def is_uniform : Prop := ∀ ⦃α : typevec n⦄ (a a' : q.P.A)
(f : q.P.B a ⟹ α) (f' : q.P.B a' ⟹ α),
abs ⟨a, f⟩ = abs ⟨a', f'⟩ → ∀ i, f i '' univ = f' i '' univ
/-- does `abs` preserve `liftp`? -/
def liftp_preservation : Prop :=
∀ ⦃α : typevec n⦄ (p : Π ⦃i⦄, α i → Prop) (x : q.P.obj α), liftp p (abs x) ↔ liftp p x
/-- does `abs` preserve `supp`? -/
def supp_preservation : Prop :=
∀ ⦃α⦄ (x : q.P.obj α), supp (abs x) = supp x
variable [q]
theorem supp_eq_of_is_uniform (h : q.is_uniform) {α : typevec n} (a : q.P.A) (f : q.P.B a ⟹ α) :
∀ i, supp (abs ⟨a, f⟩) i = f i '' univ :=
begin
intro, ext u, rw [mem_supp], split,
{ intro h', apply h' _ _ rfl },
intros h' a' f' e,
rw [←h _ _ _ _ e.symm], apply h'
end
theorem liftp_iff_of_is_uniform (h : q.is_uniform) {α : typevec n} (x : F α) (p : Π i, α i → Prop) :
liftp p x ↔ ∀ i (u ∈ supp x i), p i u :=
begin
rw [liftp_iff, ←abs_repr x],
cases repr x with a f, split,
{ rintros ⟨a', f', abseq, hf⟩ u,
rw [supp_eq_of_is_uniform h, h _ _ _ _ abseq],
rintros b ⟨i, _, hi⟩, rw ←hi, apply hf },
intro h',
refine ⟨a, f, rfl, λ _ i, h' _ _ _⟩,
rw supp_eq_of_is_uniform h,
exact ⟨i, mem_univ i, rfl⟩
end
theorem supp_map (h : q.is_uniform) {α β : typevec n} (g : α ⟹ β) (x : F α) (i) :
supp (g <$$> x) i = g i '' supp x i :=
begin
rw ←abs_repr x, cases repr x with a f, rw [←abs_map, mvpfunctor.map_eq],
rw [supp_eq_of_is_uniform h, supp_eq_of_is_uniform h, ← image_comp],
refl,
end
theorem supp_preservation_iff_uniform :
q.supp_preservation ↔ q.is_uniform :=
begin
split,
{ intros h α a a' f f' h' i,
rw [← mvpfunctor.supp_eq,← mvpfunctor.supp_eq,← h,h',h] },
{ rintros h α ⟨a,f⟩, ext, rwa [supp_eq_of_is_uniform,mvpfunctor.supp_eq], }
end
theorem supp_preservation_iff_liftp_preservation :
q.supp_preservation ↔ q.liftp_preservation :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rintros α p ⟨a,f⟩,
have h' := h, rw supp_preservation_iff_uniform at h',
dsimp only [supp_preservation,supp] at h,
simp only [liftp_iff_of_is_uniform, supp_eq_of_is_uniform, mvpfunctor.liftp_iff', h',
image_univ, mem_range, exists_imp_distrib],
split; intros; subst_vars; solve_by_elim },
{ rintros α ⟨a,f⟩,
simp only [liftp_preservation] at h,
ext, simp [supp,h] }
end
theorem liftp_preservation_iff_uniform :
q.liftp_preservation ↔ q.is_uniform :=
by rw [← supp_preservation_iff_liftp_preservation, supp_preservation_iff_uniform]
end mvqpf
|
ca0e79e1d3a99960da10c3fe117d17f5a6e14ff8 | dd0f5513e11c52db157d2fcc8456d9401a6cd9da | /05_Interacting_with_Lean.org.4.lean | 6e1596f14c256d7ce975d8228ba7901ab24c5019 | [] | no_license | cjmazey/lean-tutorial | ba559a49f82aa6c5848b9bf17b7389bf7f4ba645 | 381f61c9fcac56d01d959ae0fa6e376f2c4e3b34 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,286,098,832 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 43,082,433 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 271 | lean | /- page 65 -/
import standard
import data.nat
open nat
set_option pp.implicit true
set_option pp.universes true
set_option pp.notation false
set_option pp.numerals false
check 2 + 2 = 4
eval (λ x, x + 2) = (λ x, x + 3)
set_option pp.beta true
check (λ x, x + 1) 1
|
72f10a1d4662dda301edec7b7f67549b6b287479 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/481.lean | b2445b67ab4ac206b6b24968ffbdd05ca4594467 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 137 | lean | example (b : let n : Nat := 2; (n = 13)) : Bool := by
simp_all
example (b : let n : Nat := 2; (n = 13)) : n + 1 = 14 := by
simp_all
|
f47ae5861a9257977217fa5805609fe73ce31365 | 46125763b4dbf50619e8846a1371029346f4c3db | /src/data/real/ereal.lean | 052e3e6e43efbc0398740abb188d61e956e8fe97 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | thjread/mathlib | a9d97612cedc2c3101060737233df15abcdb9eb1 | 7cffe2520a5518bba19227a107078d83fa725ddc | refs/heads/master | 1,615,637,696,376 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 246,680,271 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,583,960,875,000 | 1,583,960,875,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,336 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import data.real.basic
/-!
# The extended reals [-∞, ∞].
This file defines `ereal`, the real numbers together with a top and bottom element,
referred to as ⊤ and ⊥. It is implemented as `with_top (with_bot ℝ)`
Addition and multiplication are problematic in the presence of ±∞, but
negation has a natural definition and satisfies the usual properties.
An addition is derived, but `ereal` is not even a monoid (there is no identity).
`ereal` is a `complete_lattice`; this is now deduced by type class inference from
the fact that `with_top (with_bot L)` is a complete lattice if `L` is
a conditionally complete lattice.
## Tags
real, ereal, complete lattice
## TODO
abs : ereal → ennreal
In Isabelle they define + - * and / (making junk choices for things like -∞ + ∞)
and then prove whatever bits of the ordered ring/field axioms still hold. They
also do some limits stuff (liminf/limsup etc).
See https://isabelle.in.tum.de/dist/library/HOL/HOL-Library/Extended_Real.html
-/
/-- ereal : The type `[-∞, ∞]` -/
@[derive [linear_order, lattice.order_bot, lattice.order_top,
lattice.has_Sup, lattice.has_Inf, lattice.complete_lattice, has_add]]
def ereal := with_top (with_bot ℝ)
namespace ereal
instance : has_coe ℝ ereal := ⟨some ∘ some⟩
@[simp, elim_cast] protected lemma coe_real_le {x y : ℝ} : (x : ereal) ≤ (y : ereal) ↔ x ≤ y :=
by { unfold_coes, norm_num }
@[simp, elim_cast] protected lemma coe_real_lt {x y : ℝ} : (x : ereal) < (y : ereal) ↔ x < y :=
by { unfold_coes, norm_num }
@[simp, elim_cast] protected lemma coe_real_inj' {x y : ℝ} : (x : ereal) = (y : ereal) ↔ x = y :=
by { unfold_coes, simp [option.some_inj] }
/- neg -/
/-- negation on ereal -/
protected def neg : ereal → ereal
| ⊥ := ⊤
| ⊤ := ⊥
| (x : ℝ) := (-x : ℝ)
instance : has_neg ereal := ⟨ereal.neg⟩
@[move_cast] protected lemma neg_def (x : ℝ) : ((-x : ℝ) : ereal) = -x := rfl
/-- - -a = a on ereal -/
protected theorem neg_neg : ∀ (a : ereal), - (- a) = a
| ⊥ := rfl
| ⊤ := rfl
| (a : ℝ) := by { norm_cast, simp [neg_neg a] }
theorem neg_inj (a b : ereal) (h : -a = -b) : a = b := by rw [←ereal.neg_neg a, h, ereal.neg_neg b]
/-- Even though ereal is not an additive group, -a = b ↔ -b = a still holds -/
theorem neg_eq_iff_neg_eq {a b : ereal} : -a = b ↔ -b = a :=
⟨by {intro h, rw ←h, exact ereal.neg_neg a},
by {intro h, rw ←h, exact ereal.neg_neg b}⟩
/-- if -a ≤ b then -b ≤ a on ereal -/
protected theorem neg_le_of_neg_le : ∀ {a b : ereal} (h : -a ≤ b), -b ≤ a
| ⊥ ⊥ h := h
| ⊥ (some b) h := by cases (lattice.top_le_iff.1 h)
| ⊤ l h := lattice.le_top
| (a : ℝ) ⊥ h := by cases (lattice.le_bot_iff.1 h)
| l ⊤ h := lattice.bot_le
| (a : ℝ) (b : ℝ) h := by { norm_cast at h ⊢, exact _root_.neg_le_of_neg_le h }
/-- -a ≤ b ↔ -b ≤ a on ereal-/
protected theorem neg_le {a b : ereal} : -a ≤ b ↔ -b ≤ a :=
⟨ereal.neg_le_of_neg_le, ereal.neg_le_of_neg_le⟩
/-- a ≤ -b → b ≤ -a on ereal -/
theorem le_neg_of_le_neg {a b : ereal} (h : a ≤ -b) : b ≤ -a :=
by rwa [←ereal.neg_neg b, ereal.neg_le, ereal.neg_neg]
end ereal
|
11c17766bbd9a9bd6dbe9a85c7a3bab95e3868aa | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/order/order_iso_nat.lean | 61b2b46975bd7c9a72844686c73742d4a6635349 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,459 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.nat.lattice
import logic.denumerable
import logic.function.iterate
import order.hom.basic
import tactic.congrm
/-!
# Relation embeddings from the naturals
This file allows translation from monotone functions `ℕ → α` to order embeddings `ℕ ↪ α` and
defines the limit value of an eventually-constant sequence.
## Main declarations
* `nat_lt`/`nat_gt`: Make an order embedding `ℕ ↪ α` from an increasing/decreasing function `ℕ → α`.
* `monotonic_sequence_limit`: The limit of an eventually-constant monotone sequence `ℕ →o α`.
* `monotonic_sequence_limit_index`: The index of the first occurence of `monotonic_sequence_limit`
in the sequence.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace rel_embedding
variables {r : α → α → Prop} [is_strict_order α r]
/-- If `f` is a strictly `r`-increasing sequence, then this returns `f` as an order embedding. -/
def nat_lt (f : ℕ → α) (H : ∀ n : ℕ, r (f n) (f (n + 1))) :
((<) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r :=
of_monotone f $ nat.rel_of_forall_rel_succ_of_lt r H
@[simp]
lemma nat_lt_apply {f : ℕ → α} {H : ∀ n : ℕ, r (f n) (f (n + 1))} {n : ℕ} : nat_lt f H n = f n :=
rfl
/-- If `f` is a strictly `r`-decreasing sequence, then this returns `f` as an order embedding. -/
def nat_gt (f : ℕ → α) (H : ∀ n : ℕ, r (f (n + 1)) (f n)) : ((>) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r :=
by haveI := is_strict_order.swap r; exact rel_embedding.swap (nat_lt f H)
theorem well_founded_iff_no_descending_seq :
well_founded r ↔ is_empty (((>) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r) :=
⟨λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨λ ⟨f, o⟩,
suffices ∀ a, acc r a → ∀ n, a ≠ f n, from this (f 0) (h _) 0 rfl,
λ a ac, begin
induction ac with a _ IH,
rintro n rfl,
exact IH (f (n+1)) (o.2 (nat.lt_succ_self _)) _ rfl
end⟩,
λ E, ⟨λ a, classical.by_contradiction $ λ na,
let ⟨f, h⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice $
show ∀ x : {a // ¬ acc r a}, ∃ y : {a // ¬ acc r a}, r y.1 x.1,
from λ ⟨x, h⟩, classical.by_contradiction $ λ hn, h $
⟨_, λ y h, classical.by_contradiction $ λ na, hn ⟨⟨y, na⟩, h⟩⟩ in
E.elim' (nat_gt (λ n, (f^[n] ⟨a, na⟩).1) $ λ n,
by { rw [function.iterate_succ'], apply h })⟩⟩
end rel_embedding
namespace nat
variables (s : set ℕ) [infinite s]
/-- An order embedding from `ℕ` to itself with a specified range -/
def order_embedding_of_set [decidable_pred (∈ s)] : ℕ ↪o ℕ :=
(rel_embedding.order_embedding_of_lt_embedding
(rel_embedding.nat_lt (nat.subtype.of_nat s) (λ n, nat.subtype.lt_succ_self _))).trans
(order_embedding.subtype s)
/-- `nat.subtype.of_nat` as an order isomorphism between `ℕ` and an infinite subset. See also
`nat.nth` for a version where the subset may be finite. -/
noncomputable def subtype.order_iso_of_nat : ℕ ≃o s :=
by { classical, exact rel_iso.of_surjective (rel_embedding.order_embedding_of_lt_embedding
(rel_embedding.nat_lt (nat.subtype.of_nat s) (λ n, nat.subtype.lt_succ_self _)))
nat.subtype.of_nat_surjective }
variable {s}
@[simp]
lemma coe_order_embedding_of_set : ⇑(order_embedding_of_set s) = coe ∘ subtype.of_nat s := rfl
lemma order_embedding_of_set_apply {n : ℕ} : order_embedding_of_set s n = subtype.of_nat s n := rfl
@[simp]
lemma subtype.order_iso_of_nat_apply {n : ℕ} : subtype.order_iso_of_nat s n = subtype.of_nat s n :=
by simp [subtype.order_iso_of_nat]
variable (s)
lemma order_embedding_of_set_range : set.range (nat.order_embedding_of_set s) = s :=
subtype.coe_comp_of_nat_range
theorem exists_subseq_of_forall_mem_union {s t : set α} (e : ℕ → α) (he : ∀ n, e n ∈ s ∪ t) :
∃ g : ℕ ↪o ℕ, (∀ n, e (g n) ∈ s) ∨ (∀ n, e (g n) ∈ t) :=
begin
classical,
have : infinite (e ⁻¹' s) ∨ infinite (e ⁻¹' t),
by simp only [set.infinite_coe_iff, ← set.infinite_union, ← set.preimage_union,
set.eq_univ_of_forall (λ n, set.mem_preimage.2 (he n)), set.infinite_univ],
casesI this,
exacts [⟨nat.order_embedding_of_set (e ⁻¹' s), or.inl $ λ n, (nat.subtype.of_nat (e ⁻¹' s) _).2⟩,
⟨nat.order_embedding_of_set (e ⁻¹' t), or.inr $ λ n, (nat.subtype.of_nat (e ⁻¹' t) _).2⟩]
end
end nat
theorem exists_increasing_or_nonincreasing_subseq' (r : α → α → Prop) (f : ℕ → α) :
∃ (g : ℕ ↪o ℕ), (∀ n : ℕ, r (f (g n)) (f (g (n + 1)))) ∨
(∀ m n : ℕ, m < n → ¬ r (f (g m)) (f (g n))) :=
begin
classical,
let bad : set ℕ := { m | ∀ n, m < n → ¬ r (f m) (f n) },
by_cases hbad : infinite bad,
{ haveI := hbad,
refine ⟨nat.order_embedding_of_set bad, or.intro_right _ (λ m n mn, _)⟩,
have h := set.mem_range_self m,
rw nat.order_embedding_of_set_range bad at h,
exact h _ ((order_embedding.lt_iff_lt _).2 mn) },
{ rw [set.infinite_coe_iff, set.infinite, not_not] at hbad,
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ : ∃ m, ∀ n, m ≤ n → ¬ n ∈ bad,
{ by_cases he : hbad.to_finset.nonempty,
{ refine ⟨(hbad.to_finset.max' he).succ, λ n hn nbad, nat.not_succ_le_self _
(hn.trans (hbad.to_finset.le_max' n (hbad.mem_to_finset.2 nbad)))⟩ },
{ exact ⟨0, λ n hn nbad, he ⟨n, hbad.mem_to_finset.2 nbad⟩⟩ } },
have h : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∃ (n' : ℕ), n < n' ∧ r (f (n + m)) (f (n' + m)),
{ intro n,
have h := hm _ (le_add_of_nonneg_left n.zero_le),
simp only [exists_prop, not_not, set.mem_set_of_eq, not_forall] at h,
obtain ⟨n', hn1, hn2⟩ := h,
obtain ⟨x, hpos, rfl⟩ := exists_pos_add_of_lt hn1,
refine ⟨n + x, add_lt_add_left hpos n, _⟩,
rw [add_assoc, add_comm x m, ← add_assoc],
exact hn2 },
let g' : ℕ → ℕ := @nat.rec (λ _, ℕ) m (λ n gn, nat.find (h gn)),
exact ⟨(rel_embedding.nat_lt (λ n, g' n + m)
(λ n, nat.add_lt_add_right (nat.find_spec (h (g' n))).1 m)).order_embedding_of_lt_embedding,
or.intro_left _ (λ n, (nat.find_spec (h (g' n))).2)⟩ }
end
/-- This is the infinitary Erdős–Szekeres theorem, and an important lemma in the usual proof of
Bolzano-Weierstrass for `ℝ`. -/
theorem exists_increasing_or_nonincreasing_subseq (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trans α r] (f : ℕ → α) :
∃ (g : ℕ ↪o ℕ), (∀ m n : ℕ, m < n → r (f (g m)) (f (g n))) ∨
(∀ m n : ℕ, m < n → ¬ r (f (g m)) (f (g n))) :=
begin
obtain ⟨g, hr | hnr⟩ := exists_increasing_or_nonincreasing_subseq' r f,
{ refine ⟨g, or.intro_left _ (λ m n mn, _)⟩,
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le (nat.succ_le_iff.2 mn),
induction x with x ih,
{ apply hr },
{ apply is_trans.trans _ _ _ _ (hr _),
exact ih (lt_of_lt_of_le m.lt_succ_self (nat.le_add_right _ _)) } },
{ exact ⟨g, or.intro_right _ hnr⟩ }
end
lemma well_founded.monotone_chain_condition' [preorder α] :
well_founded ((>) : α → α → Prop) ↔ ∀ (a : ℕ →o α), ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → ¬ a n < a m :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h a, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ have hne : (set.range a).nonempty := ⟨a 0, by simp⟩,
obtain ⟨x, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H⟩ := h.has_min _ hne,
exact ⟨n, λ m hm, H _ (set.mem_range_self _)⟩ },
{ refine rel_embedding.well_founded_iff_no_descending_seq.2 ⟨λ a, _⟩,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h (a.swap : ((<) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) →r ((<) : α → α → Prop)).to_order_hom,
exact hn n.succ n.lt_succ_self.le ((rel_embedding.map_rel_iff _).2 n.lt_succ_self) },
end
/-- The "monotone chain condition" below is sometimes a convenient form of well foundedness. -/
lemma well_founded.monotone_chain_condition [partial_order α] :
well_founded ((>) : α → α → Prop) ↔ ∀ (a : ℕ →o α), ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → a n = a m :=
well_founded.monotone_chain_condition'.trans $ begin
congrm ∀ a, ∃ n, ∀ m (h : n ≤ m), (_ : Prop),
rw lt_iff_le_and_ne,
simp [a.mono h]
end
/-- Given an eventually-constant monotone sequence `a₀ ≤ a₁ ≤ a₂ ≤ ...` in a partially-ordered
type, `monotonic_sequence_limit_index a` is the least natural number `n` for which `aₙ` reaches the
constant value. For sequences that are not eventually constant, `monotonic_sequence_limit_index a`
is defined, but is a junk value. -/
noncomputable def monotonic_sequence_limit_index [preorder α] (a : ℕ →o α) : ℕ :=
Inf {n | ∀ m, n ≤ m → a n = a m}
/-- The constant value of an eventually-constant monotone sequence `a₀ ≤ a₁ ≤ a₂ ≤ ...` in a
partially-ordered type. -/
noncomputable def monotonic_sequence_limit [preorder α] (a : ℕ →o α) :=
a (monotonic_sequence_limit_index a)
lemma well_founded.supr_eq_monotonic_sequence_limit [complete_lattice α]
(h : well_founded ((>) : α → α → Prop)) (a : ℕ →o α) : supr a = monotonic_sequence_limit a :=
begin
suffices : (⨆ (m : ℕ), a m) ≤ monotonic_sequence_limit a,
{ exact le_antisymm this (le_supr a _), },
apply supr_le,
intros m,
by_cases hm : m ≤ monotonic_sequence_limit_index a,
{ exact a.monotone hm, },
{ replace hm := le_of_not_le hm,
let S := { n | ∀ m, n ≤ m → a n = a m },
have hInf : Inf S ∈ S,
{ refine nat.Inf_mem _, rw well_founded.monotone_chain_condition at h, exact h a, },
change Inf S ≤ m at hm,
change a m ≤ a (Inf S),
rw hInf m hm, },
end
|
08315da977aee30547fb6443d5693d92a4a51614 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /stage0/src/Lean/Server/Utils.lean | 45a4eb2f7a3a6bac8feed754b649fb04be1b2235 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,793 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Wojciech Nawrocki. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wojciech Nawrocki, Marc Huisinga
-/
import Lean.Data.Position
import Lean.Data.Lsp
import Lean.Server.InfoUtils
import Init.System.FilePath
import Lean.Parser.Basic
import Std.System.Uri
namespace IO
def throwServerError (err : String) : IO α :=
throw (userError err)
namespace FS.Stream
/-- Chains two streams by creating a new stream s.t. writing to it
just writes to `a` but reading from it also duplicates the read output
into `b`, c.f. `a | tee b` on Unix.
NB: if `a` is written to but this stream is never read from,
the output will *not* be duplicated. Use this if you only care
about the data that was actually read. -/
def chainRight (a : Stream) (b : Stream) (flushEagerly : Bool := false) : Stream :=
{ a with
flush := a.flush *> b.flush
read := fun sz => do
let bs ← a.read sz
b.write bs
if flushEagerly then b.flush
pure bs
getLine := do
let ln ← a.getLine
b.putStr ln
if flushEagerly then b.flush
pure ln }
/-- Like `tee a | b` on Unix. See `chainOut`. -/
def chainLeft (a : Stream) (b : Stream) (flushEagerly : Bool := false) : Stream :=
{ b with
flush := a.flush *> b.flush
write := fun bs => do
a.write bs
if flushEagerly then a.flush
b.write bs
putStr := fun s => do
a.putStr s
if flushEagerly then a.flush
b.putStr s }
/-- Prefixes all written outputs with `pre`. -/
def withPrefix (a : Stream) (pre : String) : Stream :=
{ a with
write := fun bs => do
a.putStr pre
a.write bs
putStr := fun s =>
a.putStr (pre ++ s) }
end FS.Stream
end IO
namespace Lean.Server
structure DocumentMeta where
uri : Lsp.DocumentUri
version : Nat
text : FileMap
deriving Inhabited
def DocumentMeta.mkInputContext (doc : DocumentMeta) : Parser.InputContext where
input := doc.text.source
fileName := (System.Uri.fileUriToPath? doc.uri).getD doc.uri |>.toString
fileMap := doc.text
def replaceLspRange (text : FileMap) (r : Lsp.Range) (newText : String) : FileMap :=
let start := text.lspPosToUtf8Pos r.start
let «end» := text.lspPosToUtf8Pos r.«end»
let pre := text.source.extract 0 start
let post := text.source.extract «end» text.source.endPos
(pre ++ newText ++ post).toFileMap
open IO
/-- Duplicates an I/O stream to a log file `fName` in LEAN_SERVER_LOG_DIR
if that envvar is set. -/
def maybeTee (fName : String) (isOut : Bool) (h : FS.Stream) : IO FS.Stream := do
match (← IO.getEnv "LEAN_SERVER_LOG_DIR") with
| none => pure h
| some logDir =>
IO.FS.createDirAll logDir
let hTee ← FS.Handle.mk (System.mkFilePath [logDir, fName]) FS.Mode.write true
let hTee := FS.Stream.ofHandle hTee
pure $ if isOut then
hTee.chainLeft h true
else
h.chainRight hTee true
open Lsp
/-- Returns the document contents with the change applied. -/
def applyDocumentChange (oldText : FileMap) : (change : Lsp.TextDocumentContentChangeEvent) → FileMap
| TextDocumentContentChangeEvent.rangeChange (range : Range) (newText : String) =>
replaceLspRange oldText range newText
| TextDocumentContentChangeEvent.fullChange (newText : String) =>
newText.toFileMap
/-- Returns the document contents with all changes applied. -/
def foldDocumentChanges (changes : Array Lsp.TextDocumentContentChangeEvent) (oldText : FileMap) : FileMap :=
changes.foldl applyDocumentChange oldText
def publishDiagnostics (m : DocumentMeta) (diagnostics : Array Lsp.Diagnostic) (hOut : FS.Stream) : IO Unit :=
hOut.writeLspNotification {
method := "textDocument/publishDiagnostics"
param := {
uri := m.uri
version? := m.version
diagnostics := diagnostics
: PublishDiagnosticsParams
}
}
def publishProgress (m : DocumentMeta) (processing : Array LeanFileProgressProcessingInfo) (hOut : FS.Stream) : IO Unit :=
hOut.writeLspNotification {
method := "$/lean/fileProgress"
param := {
textDocument := { uri := m.uri, version? := m.version }
processing
: LeanFileProgressParams
}
}
def publishProgressAtPos (m : DocumentMeta) (pos : String.Pos) (hOut : FS.Stream) (kind : LeanFileProgressKind := LeanFileProgressKind.processing) : IO Unit :=
publishProgress m #[{ range := ⟨m.text.utf8PosToLspPos pos, m.text.utf8PosToLspPos m.text.source.endPos⟩, kind := kind }] hOut
def publishProgressDone (m : DocumentMeta) (hOut : FS.Stream) : IO Unit :=
publishProgress m #[] hOut
end Lean.Server
def String.Range.toLspRange (text : Lean.FileMap) (r : String.Range) : Lean.Lsp.Range :=
⟨text.utf8PosToLspPos r.start, text.utf8PosToLspPos r.stop⟩
|
b6f4ee1ca4e4a075316e1068527ed423f7067a9a | 359199d7253811b032ab92108191da7336eba86e | /src/mywork/sep_3_2021.lean | c8c4a84f44e2dd2d26a97d497d7d456c9df4db9f | [] | no_license | arte-et-marte/my_cs2120f21 | 0bc6215cb5018a3b7c90d9d399a173233f587064 | 91609c3609ad81fda895bee8b97cc76813241e17 | refs/heads/main | 1,693,298,928,348 | 1,634,931,202,000 | 1,634,931,202,000 | 399,946,705 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,753 | lean | /-
Theorem: Equality is symmetric.
Note(s): assume the premises of the conjecture are true, to prove that something is true for all objects of a any type
pick an arbitrary object of an arbitrary type, if we want to prove an implication (if-then) assume that we have a proof
of that statement, equality relation an enabler of the use of the substitutability axiom, theorem keyword signals the
creation of a proof, theorem keyword could be replaced with def keyword.
-/
theorem eq_is_symm :
∀ (T : Type) (x y : T), x = y → y = x :=
begin
assume (T : Type),
assume (x y : T),
assume (e : x = y), /-assuming that we have a proof of our implication-/
rw e
end
/-
Theorem: ∀ (T : Type) (x y : T), x = y → y = x.
Proof: Assume that T is any type and that we have objects of x and y of this type. Remaining to be shown is that if x = y
, then y = x. To prove this, we'll assume the premise that x = y. We need to prove y = x. By the axiom of the substitutability
of equals, and the assumed fact that x = y, we can REWRITE the x in the goal as y, yielding y = y as our new proof goal.
This is true by the axiom of the reflexivity of equality. QED (quod est demonstratum - thus it is shown).
-/
/-
Theorem: Equality is transitive.
Note(s): assume T is shorthand. substitutability takes an argument a proof of equality.
-/
theorem eq_is_trans :
∀ (T : Type) (x y z : T), x = y → y = z → x = z :=
begin
assume T,
assume x y z,
assume e1,
assume e2,
rw e1,
exact e2
end
/-x=y, y=z, prove z=x-/
theorem z_equals_x :
∀ (T : Type) (x y z : T), x = y → y = z → x = z → z = x :=
begin
assume (T : Type),
assume (x y z : T),
assume (e1 : x = y),
assume (e2 : y = z),
assume (e3 : x = z),
end |
e31c5ab1861560290fad610460131b7f001ed497 | b7b549d2cf38ac9d4e49372b7ad4d37f70449409 | /src/LeanLLVM/sized.lean | af9a90129d5f8be88ce34b812857a0ef8fe72a42 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean-llvm | 7cc196172fe02ff3554edba6cc82f333c30fdc2b | 36e2ec604ae22d8ec1b1b66eca0f8887880db6c6 | refs/heads/master | 1,637,359,020,356 | 1,629,332,114,000 | 1,629,402,464,000 | 146,700,234 | 29 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,631,225,695,000 | 1,535,607,191,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,205 | lean | import tactic.linarith
namespace sized
def map {a b:Type} [has_sizeof a] (sz:ℕ) (f : Πx:a, sizeof x < sz → b) : Πxs:list a, (sizeof xs <= sz) → list b
| [] _ := []
| (x::xs) H :=
have Hx : sizeof x < sz, by { unfold sizeof has_sizeof.sizeof list.sizeof at *, linarith },
have Hxs : sizeof xs <= sz, by { unfold sizeof has_sizeof.sizeof list.sizeof at *, linarith },
f x Hx :: map xs Hxs
.
@[reducible]
def map_over {a b:Type} [has_sizeof a] (xs:list a) (f : Πx:a, sizeof x < sizeof xs → b) : list b :=
map (sizeof xs) f xs (nat.less_than_or_equal.refl _).
@[reducible]
def psum_size {A B:Type} (f:A → ℕ) (g:B → ℕ) : psum A B → ℕ
| (psum.inl x) := f x
| (psum.inr y) := g y
.
@[reducible]
def psum3_has_wf {A B C:Type} [has_sizeof A] [has_sizeof B] [has_sizeof C] : has_well_founded (psum A (psum B C)) :=
⟨ measure (psum_size sizeof (psum_size sizeof sizeof))
, measure_wf _
⟩.
@[reducible]
def psum4_has_wf {A B C D:Type} [has_sizeof A] [has_sizeof B] [has_sizeof C] [has_sizeof D]: has_well_founded (psum A (psum B (psum C D))) :=
⟨ measure (psum_size sizeof (psum_size sizeof (psum_size sizeof sizeof)))
, measure_wf _
⟩.
end sized
|
0132e61794b3047858c5cc8a5a5978ab071e5742 | 3863d2564418bccb1859e057bf5a4ef240e75fd7 | /hott/init/ua.hlean | 22aa941daca38413930e6abd6bb0e48da0811b82 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JacobGross/lean | 118bbb067ff4d4af48a266face2c7eb9868fa91c | eb26087df940c54337cb807b4bc6d345d1fc1085 | refs/heads/master | 1,582,735,011,532 | 1,462,557,826,000 | 1,462,557,826,000 | 46,451,196 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,462,557,826,000 | 1,447,885,161,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,603 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
Ported from Coq HoTT
-/
prelude
import .equiv
open eq equiv is_equiv
--Ensure that the types compared are in the same universe
section
universe variable l
variables {A B : Type.{l}}
definition is_equiv_cast_of_eq [constructor] (H : A = B) : is_equiv (cast H) :=
is_equiv_tr (λX, X) H
definition equiv_of_eq [constructor] (H : A = B) : A ≃ B :=
equiv.mk _ (is_equiv_cast_of_eq H)
definition equiv_of_eq_refl [reducible] [unfold_full] (A : Type)
: equiv_of_eq (refl A) = equiv.refl :=
idp
end
axiom univalence (A B : Type) : is_equiv (@equiv_of_eq A B)
attribute univalence [instance]
-- This is the version of univalence axiom we will probably use most often
definition ua [reducible] {A B : Type} : A ≃ B → A = B :=
equiv_of_eq⁻¹
definition eq_equiv_equiv (A B : Type) : (A = B) ≃ (A ≃ B) :=
equiv.mk equiv_of_eq _
definition equiv_of_eq_ua [reducible] {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) : equiv_of_eq (ua f) = f :=
right_inv equiv_of_eq f
definition cast_ua_fn {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) : cast (ua f) = f :=
ap to_fun (equiv_of_eq_ua f)
definition cast_ua {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) (a : A) : cast (ua f) a = f a :=
ap10 (cast_ua_fn f) a
definition cast_ua_inv_fn {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) : cast (ua f)⁻¹ = to_inv f :=
ap to_inv (equiv_of_eq_ua f)
definition cast_ua_inv {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) (b : B) : cast (ua f)⁻¹ b = to_inv f b :=
ap10 (cast_ua_inv_fn f) b
definition ua_equiv_of_eq [reducible] {A B : Type} (p : A = B) : ua (equiv_of_eq p) = p :=
left_inv equiv_of_eq p
definition eq_of_equiv_lift {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) : A = lift B :=
ua (f ⬝e !equiv_lift)
namespace equiv
-- One consequence of UA is that we can transport along equivalencies of types
-- We can use this for calculation evironments
protected definition transport_of_equiv [subst] (P : Type → Type) {A B : Type} (H : A ≃ B)
: P A → P B :=
eq.transport P (ua H)
-- we can "recurse" on equivalences, by replacing them by (equiv_of_eq _)
definition rec_on_ua [recursor] {A B : Type} {P : A ≃ B → Type}
(f : A ≃ B) (H : Π(q : A = B), P (equiv_of_eq q)) : P f :=
right_inv equiv_of_eq f ▸ H (ua f)
-- a variant where we immediately recurse on the equality in the new goal
definition rec_on_ua_idp [recursor] {A : Type} {P : Π{B}, A ≃ B → Type} {B : Type}
(f : A ≃ B) (H : P equiv.refl) : P f :=
rec_on_ua f (λq, eq.rec_on q H)
-- a variant where (equiv_of_eq (ua f)) will be replaced by f in the new goal
definition rec_on_ua' {A B : Type} {P : A ≃ B → A = B → Type}
(f : A ≃ B) (H : Π(q : A = B), P (equiv_of_eq q) q) : P f (ua f) :=
right_inv equiv_of_eq f ▸ H (ua f)
-- a variant where we do both
definition rec_on_ua_idp' {A : Type} {P : Π{B}, A ≃ B → A = B → Type} {B : Type}
(f : A ≃ B) (H : P equiv.refl idp) : P f (ua f) :=
rec_on_ua' f (λq, eq.rec_on q H)
definition ua_refl (A : Type) : ua erfl = idpath A :=
eq_of_fn_eq_fn !eq_equiv_equiv (right_inv !eq_equiv_equiv erfl)
definition ua_symm {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) : ua f⁻¹ᵉ = (ua f)⁻¹ :=
begin
apply rec_on_ua_idp f,
refine !ua_refl ⬝ inverse2 !ua_refl⁻¹
end
definition ua_trans {A B C : Type} (f : A ≃ B) (g : B ≃ C) : ua (f ⬝e g) = ua f ⬝ ua g :=
begin
apply rec_on_ua_idp g, apply rec_on_ua_idp f,
refine !ua_refl ⬝ concat2 !ua_refl⁻¹ !ua_refl⁻¹
end
end equiv
|
199199beec8e3407fb0612132210e70ca4ac8fef | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/measure_theory/group/measure.lean | 1946376e3d5ab490da36cdd9456b77dcd5538335 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,341 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import dynamics.ergodic.measure_preserving
import measure_theory.measure.regular
import measure_theory.group.measurable_equiv
import measure_theory.measure.open_pos
import measure_theory.constructions.prod
/-!
# Measures on Groups
We develop some properties of measures on (topological) groups
* We define properties on measures: measures that are left or right invariant w.r.t. multiplication.
* We define the measure `μ.inv : A ↦ μ(A⁻¹)` and show that it is right invariant iff
`μ` is left invariant.
* We define a class `is_haar_measure μ`, requiring that the measure `μ` is left-invariant, finite
on compact sets, and positive on open sets.
We also give analogues of all these notions in the additive world.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale ennreal pointwise big_operators
open has_inv set function measure_theory.measure
variables {G : Type*} [measurable_space G]
namespace measure_theory
namespace measure
/-- A measure `μ` on a measurable additive group is left invariant
if the measure of left translations of a set are equal to the measure of the set itself. -/
class is_add_left_invariant [has_add G] (μ : measure G) : Prop :=
(map_add_left_eq_self : ∀ g : G, map ((+) g) μ = μ)
/-- A measure `μ` on a measurable group is left invariant
if the measure of left translations of a set are equal to the measure of the set itself. -/
@[to_additive] class is_mul_left_invariant [has_mul G] (μ : measure G) : Prop :=
(map_mul_left_eq_self : ∀ g : G, map ((*) g) μ = μ)
/-- A measure `μ` on a measurable additive group is right invariant
if the measure of right translations of a set are equal to the measure of the set itself. -/
class is_add_right_invariant [has_add G] (μ : measure G) : Prop :=
(map_add_right_eq_self : ∀ g : G, map (+ g) μ = μ)
/-- A measure `μ` on a measurable group is right invariant
if the measure of right translations of a set are equal to the measure of the set itself. -/
@[to_additive] class is_mul_right_invariant [has_mul G] (μ : measure G) : Prop :=
(map_mul_right_eq_self : ∀ g : G, map (* g) μ = μ)
end measure
open measure
section mul
variables [has_mul G] {μ : measure G}
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul_left_eq_self (μ : measure G) [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (g : G) : map ((*) g) μ = μ :=
is_mul_left_invariant.map_mul_left_eq_self g
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul_right_eq_self (μ : measure G) [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (g : G) : map (* g) μ = μ :=
is_mul_right_invariant.map_mul_right_eq_self g
@[to_additive]
instance [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (c : ℝ≥0∞) : is_mul_left_invariant (c • μ) :=
⟨λ g, by rw [measure.map_smul, map_mul_left_eq_self]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (c : ℝ≥0∞) : is_mul_right_invariant (c • μ) :=
⟨λ g, by rw [measure.map_smul, map_mul_right_eq_self]⟩
section has_measurable_mul
variables [has_measurable_mul G]
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_preserving_mul_left (μ : measure G) [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (g : G) :
measure_preserving ((*) g) μ μ :=
⟨measurable_const_mul g, map_mul_left_eq_self μ g⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_preserving_mul_right (μ : measure G) [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (g : G) :
measure_preserving (* g) μ μ :=
⟨measurable_mul_const g, map_mul_right_eq_self μ g⟩
/-- An alternative way to prove that `μ` is left invariant under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive /-" An alternative way to prove that `μ` is left invariant under addition. "-/]
lemma forall_measure_preimage_mul_iff (μ : measure G) :
(∀ (g : G) (A : set G), measurable_set A → μ ((λ h, g * h) ⁻¹' A) = μ A) ↔
is_mul_left_invariant μ :=
begin
transitivity ∀ g, map ((*) g) μ = μ,
{ simp_rw [measure.ext_iff],
refine forall_congr (λ g, forall_congr $ λ A, forall_congr $ λ hA, _),
rw [map_apply (measurable_const_mul g) hA] },
exact ⟨λ h, ⟨h⟩, λ h, h.1⟩
end
/-- An alternative way to prove that `μ` is right invariant under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive /-" An alternative way to prove that `μ` is right invariant under addition. "-/]
lemma forall_measure_preimage_mul_right_iff (μ : measure G) :
(∀ (g : G) (A : set G), measurable_set A → μ ((λ h, h * g) ⁻¹' A) = μ A) ↔
is_mul_right_invariant μ :=
begin
transitivity ∀ g, map (* g) μ = μ,
{ simp_rw [measure.ext_iff],
refine forall_congr (λ g, forall_congr $ λ A, forall_congr $ λ hA, _),
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hA] },
exact ⟨λ h, ⟨h⟩, λ h, h.1⟩
end
@[to_additive]
instance [is_mul_left_invariant μ] [sigma_finite μ] {H : Type*} [has_mul H]
{mH : measurable_space H} {ν : measure H} [has_measurable_mul H]
[is_mul_left_invariant ν] [sigma_finite ν] :
is_mul_left_invariant (μ.prod ν) :=
begin
constructor,
rintros ⟨g, h⟩,
change map (prod.map ((*) g) ((*) h)) (μ.prod ν) = μ.prod ν,
rw [← map_prod_map _ _ (measurable_const_mul g) (measurable_const_mul h),
map_mul_left_eq_self μ g, map_mul_left_eq_self ν h],
{ rw map_mul_left_eq_self μ g, apply_instance },
{ rw map_mul_left_eq_self ν h, apply_instance },
end
@[to_additive]
instance [is_mul_right_invariant μ] [sigma_finite μ] {H : Type*} [has_mul H]
{mH : measurable_space H} {ν : measure H} [has_measurable_mul H]
[is_mul_right_invariant ν] [sigma_finite ν] :
is_mul_right_invariant (μ.prod ν) :=
begin
constructor,
rintros ⟨g, h⟩,
change map (prod.map (* g) (* h)) (μ.prod ν) = μ.prod ν,
rw [← map_prod_map _ _ (measurable_mul_const g) (measurable_mul_const h),
map_mul_right_eq_self μ g, map_mul_right_eq_self ν h],
{ rw map_mul_right_eq_self μ g, apply_instance },
{ rw map_mul_right_eq_self ν h, apply_instance },
end
end has_measurable_mul
end mul
section group
variables [group G]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_div_right_eq_self (μ : measure G) [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (g : G) :
map (/ g) μ = μ :=
by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, map_mul_right_eq_self μ g⁻¹]
variables [has_measurable_mul G]
/-- We shorten this from `measure_preimage_mul_left`, since left invariant is the preferred option
for measures in this formalization. -/
@[simp, to_additive "We shorten this from `measure_preimage_add_left`, since left invariant is the
preferred option for measures in this formalization."]
lemma measure_preimage_mul (μ : measure G) [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (g : G) (A : set G) :
μ ((λ h, g * h) ⁻¹' A) = μ A :=
calc μ ((λ h, g * h) ⁻¹' A) = map (λ h, g * h) μ A :
((measurable_equiv.mul_left g).map_apply A).symm
... = μ A : by rw map_mul_left_eq_self μ g
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma measure_preimage_mul_right (μ : measure G) [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (g : G) (A : set G) :
μ ((λ h, h * g) ⁻¹' A) = μ A :=
calc μ ((λ h, h * g) ⁻¹' A) = map (λ h, h * g) μ A :
((measurable_equiv.mul_right g).map_apply A).symm
... = μ A : by rw map_mul_right_eq_self μ g
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul_left_ae (μ : measure G) [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (x : G) :
filter.map (λ h, x * h) μ.ae = μ.ae :=
((measurable_equiv.mul_left x).map_ae μ).trans $ congr_arg ae $ map_mul_left_eq_self μ x
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul_right_ae (μ : measure G) [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (x : G) :
filter.map (λ h, h * x) μ.ae = μ.ae :=
((measurable_equiv.mul_right x).map_ae μ).trans $ congr_arg ae $ map_mul_right_eq_self μ x
@[to_additive]
lemma map_div_right_ae (μ : measure G) [is_mul_right_invariant μ] (x : G) :
filter.map (λ t, t / x) μ.ae = μ.ae :=
((measurable_equiv.div_right x).map_ae μ).trans $ congr_arg ae $ map_div_right_eq_self μ x
end group
namespace measure
/-- The measure `A ↦ μ (A⁻¹)`, where `A⁻¹` is the pointwise inverse of `A`. -/
@[to_additive "The measure `A ↦ μ (- A)`, where `- A` is the pointwise negation of `A`."]
protected def inv [has_inv G] (μ : measure G) : measure G :=
measure.map inv μ
/-- A measure is invariant under negation if `- μ = μ`. Equivalently, this means that for all
measurable `A` we have `μ (- A) = μ A`, where `- A` is the pointwise negation of `A`. -/
class is_neg_invariant [has_neg G] (μ : measure G) : Prop :=
(neg_eq_self : μ.neg = μ)
/-- A measure is invariant under inversion if `μ⁻¹ = μ`. Equivalently, this means that for all
measurable `A` we have `μ (A⁻¹) = μ A`, where `A⁻¹` is the pointwise inverse of `A`. -/
@[to_additive] class is_inv_invariant [has_inv G] (μ : measure G) : Prop :=
(inv_eq_self : μ.inv = μ)
section inv
variables [has_inv G]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma inv_eq_self (μ : measure G) [is_inv_invariant μ] : μ.inv = μ :=
is_inv_invariant.inv_eq_self
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_inv_eq_self (μ : measure G) [is_inv_invariant μ] : map has_inv.inv μ = μ :=
is_inv_invariant.inv_eq_self
end inv
section has_involutive_inv
variables [has_involutive_inv G] [has_measurable_inv G]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma inv_apply (μ : measure G) (s : set G) : μ.inv s = μ s⁻¹ :=
(measurable_equiv.inv G).map_apply s
@[simp, to_additive]
protected lemma inv_inv (μ : measure G) : μ.inv.inv = μ :=
(measurable_equiv.inv G).map_symm_map
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma measure_inv (μ : measure G) [is_inv_invariant μ] (A : set G) : μ A⁻¹ = μ A :=
by rw [← inv_apply, inv_eq_self]
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_preimage_inv (μ : measure G) [is_inv_invariant μ] (A : set G) :
μ (has_inv.inv ⁻¹' A) = μ A :=
μ.measure_inv A
@[to_additive]
instance (μ : measure G) [sigma_finite μ] : sigma_finite μ.inv :=
(measurable_equiv.inv G).sigma_finite_map ‹_›
end has_involutive_inv
section mul_inv
variables [group G] [has_measurable_mul G] [has_measurable_inv G] {μ : measure G}
@[to_additive]
instance [is_mul_left_invariant μ] : is_mul_right_invariant μ.inv :=
begin
constructor,
intro g,
conv_rhs { rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g⁻¹] },
simp_rw [measure.inv, map_map (measurable_mul_const g) measurable_inv,
map_map measurable_inv (measurable_const_mul g⁻¹), function.comp, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
end
@[to_additive]
instance [is_mul_right_invariant μ] : is_mul_left_invariant μ.inv :=
begin
constructor,
intro g,
conv_rhs { rw [← map_mul_right_eq_self μ g⁻¹] },
simp_rw [measure.inv, map_map (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv,
map_map measurable_inv (measurable_mul_const g⁻¹), function.comp, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma map_div_left_eq_self (μ : measure G) [is_inv_invariant μ] [is_mul_left_invariant μ] (g : G) :
map (λ t, g / t) μ = μ :=
begin
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv],
conv_rhs { rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g, ← map_inv_eq_self μ] },
exact (map_map (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv).symm
end
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul_right_inv_eq_self (μ : measure G) [is_inv_invariant μ] [is_mul_left_invariant μ]
(g : G) : map (λ t, (g * t)⁻¹) μ = μ :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw [← map_inv_eq_self μ, ← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g] },
exact (map_map measurable_inv (measurable_const_mul g)).symm
end
@[to_additive]
lemma map_div_left_ae (μ : measure G) [is_mul_left_invariant μ] [is_inv_invariant μ] (x : G) :
filter.map (λ t, x / t) μ.ae = μ.ae :=
((measurable_equiv.div_left x).map_ae μ).trans $ congr_arg ae $ map_div_left_eq_self μ x
end mul_inv
end measure
section topological_group
variables [topological_space G] [borel_space G] {μ : measure G}
variables [group G] [topological_group G]
@[to_additive]
instance measure.regular.inv [t2_space G] [regular μ] : regular μ.inv :=
regular.map (homeomorph.inv G)
@[to_additive]
lemma regular_inv_iff [t2_space G] : μ.inv.regular ↔ μ.regular :=
begin
split,
{ introI h, rw ← μ.inv_inv, exact measure.regular.inv },
{ introI h, exact measure.regular.inv }
end
variables [is_mul_left_invariant μ]
/-- If a left-invariant measure gives positive mass to a compact set, then it gives positive mass to
any open set. -/
@[to_additive "If a left-invariant measure gives positive mass to a compact set, then it gives
positive mass to any open set."]
lemma is_open_pos_measure_of_mul_left_invariant_of_compact
(K : set G) (hK : is_compact K) (h : μ K ≠ 0) :
is_open_pos_measure μ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ U hU hne, _⟩,
contrapose! h,
rw ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
rw ← hU.interior_eq at hne,
obtain ⟨t, hKt⟩ : ∃ (t : finset G), K ⊆ ⋃ (g : G) (H : g ∈ t), (λ (h : G), g * h) ⁻¹' U :=
compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates hK hne,
calc μ K ≤ μ (⋃ (g : G) (H : g ∈ t), (λ (h : G), g * h) ⁻¹' U) : measure_mono hKt
... ≤ ∑ g in t, μ ((λ (h : G), g * h) ⁻¹' U) : measure_bUnion_finset_le _ _
... = 0 : by simp [measure_preimage_mul, h]
end
/-- A nonzero left-invariant regular measure gives positive mass to any open set. -/
@[to_additive "A nonzero left-invariant regular measure gives positive mass to any open set."]
lemma is_open_pos_measure_of_mul_left_invariant_of_regular [regular μ] (h₀ : μ ≠ 0) :
is_open_pos_measure μ :=
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := regular.exists_compact_not_null.mpr h₀
in is_open_pos_measure_of_mul_left_invariant_of_compact K hK h2K
@[to_additive]
lemma null_iff_of_is_mul_left_invariant [regular μ]
{s : set G} (hs : is_open s) :
μ s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ μ = 0 :=
begin
by_cases h3μ : μ = 0, { simp [h3μ] },
{ haveI := is_open_pos_measure_of_mul_left_invariant_of_regular h3μ,
simp only [h3μ, or_false, hs.measure_eq_zero_iff μ] },
end
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_ne_zero_iff_nonempty_of_is_mul_left_invariant [regular μ]
(hμ : μ ≠ 0) {s : set G} (hs : is_open s) :
μ s ≠ 0 ↔ s.nonempty :=
by simpa [null_iff_of_is_mul_left_invariant hs, hμ] using ne_empty_iff_nonempty
@[to_additive]
lemma measure_pos_iff_nonempty_of_is_mul_left_invariant [regular μ]
(h3μ : μ ≠ 0) {s : set G} (hs : is_open s) :
0 < μ s ↔ s.nonempty :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans $ measure_ne_zero_iff_nonempty_of_is_mul_left_invariant h3μ hs
/-- If a left-invariant measure gives finite mass to a nonempty open set, then it gives finite mass
to any compact set. -/
@[to_additive "If a left-invariant measure gives finite mass to a nonempty open set, then it gives
finite mass to any compact set."]
lemma measure_lt_top_of_is_compact_of_is_mul_left_invariant
(U : set G) (hU : is_open U) (h'U : U.nonempty) (h : μ U ≠ ∞) {K : set G} (hK : is_compact K) :
μ K < ∞ :=
begin
rw ← hU.interior_eq at h'U,
obtain ⟨t, hKt⟩ : ∃ (t : finset G), K ⊆ ⋃ (g : G) (H : g ∈ t), (λ (h : G), g * h) ⁻¹' U :=
compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates hK h'U,
calc μ K ≤ μ (⋃ (g : G) (H : g ∈ t), (λ (h : G), g * h) ⁻¹' U) : measure_mono hKt
... ≤ ∑ g in t, μ ((λ (h : G), g * h) ⁻¹' U) : measure_bUnion_finset_le _ _
... = finset.card t * μ U : by simp only [measure_preimage_mul, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
... < ∞ : ennreal.mul_lt_top ennreal.coe_nat_ne_top h
end
/-- If a left-invariant measure gives finite mass to a set with nonempty interior, then
it gives finite mass to any compact set. -/
@[to_additive "If a left-invariant measure gives finite mass to a set with nonempty interior, then
it gives finite mass to any compact set."]
lemma measure_lt_top_of_is_compact_of_is_mul_left_invariant'
{U : set G} (hU : (interior U).nonempty) (h : μ U ≠ ∞) {K : set G} (hK : is_compact K) :
μ K < ∞ :=
measure_lt_top_of_is_compact_of_is_mul_left_invariant (interior U) is_open_interior hU
((measure_mono (interior_subset)).trans_lt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 h)).ne hK
end topological_group
section comm_group
variables [comm_group G]
/-- In an abelian group every left invariant measure is also right-invariant.
We don't declare the converse as an instance, since that would loop type-class inference, and
we use `is_mul_left_invariant` as default hypotheses in abelian groups. -/
@[priority 100, to_additive "In an abelian additive group every left invariant measure is also
right-invariant. We don't declare the converse as an instance, since that would loop type-class
inference, and we use `is_add_left_invariant` as default hypotheses in abelian groups."]
instance is_mul_left_invariant.is_mul_right_invariant {μ : measure G} [is_mul_left_invariant μ] :
is_mul_right_invariant μ :=
⟨λ g, by simp_rw [mul_comm, map_mul_left_eq_self]⟩
end comm_group
section haar
namespace measure
/-- A measure on an additive group is an additive Haar measure if it is left-invariant, and gives
finite mass to compact sets and positive mass to open sets. -/
class is_add_haar_measure {G : Type*} [add_group G] [topological_space G] [measurable_space G]
(μ : measure G)
extends is_finite_measure_on_compacts μ, is_add_left_invariant μ, is_open_pos_measure μ : Prop
/-- A measure on a group is a Haar measure if it is left-invariant, and gives finite mass to compact
sets and positive mass to open sets. -/
@[to_additive]
class is_haar_measure {G : Type*} [group G] [topological_space G] [measurable_space G]
(μ : measure G)
extends is_finite_measure_on_compacts μ, is_mul_left_invariant μ, is_open_pos_measure μ : Prop
/-- Record that a Haar measure on a locally compact space is locally finite. This is needed as the
fact that a measure which is finite on compacts is locally finite is not registered as an instance,
to avoid an instance loop.
See Note [lower instance priority]. -/
@[priority 100, to_additive "Record that an additive Haar measure on a locally compact space is
locally finite. This is needed as the fact that a measure which is finite on compacts is locally
finite is not registered as an instance, to avoid an instance loop.
See Note [lower instance priority]"]
instance is_locally_finite_measure_of_is_haar_measure {G : Type*}
[group G] [measurable_space G] [topological_space G] [locally_compact_space G]
(μ : measure G) [is_haar_measure μ] :
is_locally_finite_measure μ :=
is_locally_finite_measure_of_is_finite_measure_on_compacts
section
variables [group G] [topological_space G] (μ : measure G) [is_haar_measure μ]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma haar_singleton [topological_group G] [borel_space G] (g : G) :
μ {g} = μ {(1 : G)} :=
begin
convert measure_preimage_mul μ (g⁻¹) _,
simp only [mul_one, preimage_mul_left_singleton, inv_inv],
end
@[to_additive measure_theory.measure.is_add_haar_measure.smul]
lemma is_haar_measure.smul {c : ℝ≥0∞} (cpos : c ≠ 0) (ctop : c ≠ ∞) :
is_haar_measure (c • μ) :=
{ lt_top_of_is_compact := λ K hK, ennreal.mul_lt_top ctop hK.measure_lt_top.ne,
to_is_open_pos_measure := is_open_pos_measure_smul μ cpos }
/-- If a left-invariant measure gives positive mass to some compact set with nonempty interior, then
it is a Haar measure. -/
@[to_additive "If a left-invariant measure gives positive mass to some compact set with nonempty
interior, then it is an additive Haar measure."]
lemma is_haar_measure_of_is_compact_nonempty_interior [topological_group G] [borel_space G]
(μ : measure G) [is_mul_left_invariant μ]
(K : set G) (hK : is_compact K) (h'K : (interior K).nonempty) (h : μ K ≠ 0) (h' : μ K ≠ ∞) :
is_haar_measure μ :=
{ lt_top_of_is_compact :=
λ L hL, measure_lt_top_of_is_compact_of_is_mul_left_invariant' h'K h' hL,
to_is_open_pos_measure := is_open_pos_measure_of_mul_left_invariant_of_compact K hK h }
/-- The image of a Haar measure under a group homomorphism which is also a homeomorphism is again
a Haar measure. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an additive Haar measure under an additive group homomorphism which is
also a homeomorphism is again an additive Haar measure."]
lemma is_haar_measure_map [borel_space G] [topological_group G] {H : Type*} [group H]
[topological_space H] [measurable_space H] [borel_space H] [t2_space H] [topological_group H]
(f : G ≃* H) (hf : continuous f) (hfsymm : continuous f.symm) :
is_haar_measure (measure.map f μ) :=
{ to_is_mul_left_invariant := begin
constructor,
assume h,
rw map_map (continuous_mul_left h).measurable hf.measurable,
conv_rhs { rw ← map_mul_left_eq_self μ (f.symm h) },
rw map_map hf.measurable (continuous_mul_left _).measurable,
congr' 2,
ext y,
simp only [mul_equiv.apply_symm_apply, comp_app, mul_equiv.map_mul],
end,
lt_top_of_is_compact := begin
assume K hK,
rw map_apply hf.measurable hK.measurable_set,
have : f.symm '' K = f ⁻¹' K := equiv.image_eq_preimage _ _,
rw ← this,
exact is_compact.measure_lt_top (hK.image hfsymm)
end,
to_is_open_pos_measure := hf.is_open_pos_measure_map f.surjective }
/-- A Haar measure on a σ-compact space is σ-finite.
See Note [lower instance priority] -/
@[priority 100, to_additive "A Haar measure on a σ-compact space is σ-finite.
See Note [lower instance priority]"]
instance is_haar_measure.sigma_finite [sigma_compact_space G] : sigma_finite μ :=
⟨⟨{ set := compact_covering G,
set_mem := λ n, mem_univ _,
finite := λ n, is_compact.measure_lt_top $ is_compact_compact_covering G n,
spanning := Union_compact_covering G }⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
instance {G : Type*} [group G] [topological_space G] {mG : measurable_space G}
{H : Type*} [group H] [topological_space H] {mH : measurable_space H}
(μ : measure G) (ν : measure H) [is_haar_measure μ] [is_haar_measure ν]
[sigma_finite μ] [sigma_finite ν]
[has_measurable_mul G] [has_measurable_mul H] :
is_haar_measure (μ.prod ν) := {}
open_locale topological_space
open filter
/-- If the neutral element of a group is not isolated, then a Haar measure on this group has
no atoms.
The additive version of this instance applies in particular to show that an additive Haar measure on
a nontrivial finite-dimensional real vector space has no atom. -/
@[priority 100, to_additive "If the zero element of an additive group is not isolated, then an
additive Haar measure on this group has no atoms.
This applies in particular to show that an additive Haar measure on a nontrivial finite-dimensional
real vector space has no atom."]
instance is_haar_measure.has_no_atoms [topological_group G] [borel_space G]
[t1_space G] [locally_compact_space G] [(𝓝[≠] (1 : G)).ne_bot]
(μ : measure G) [μ.is_haar_measure] :
has_no_atoms μ :=
begin
suffices H : μ {(1 : G)} ≤ 0, by { constructor, simp [le_bot_iff.1 H] },
obtain ⟨K, K_compact, K_int⟩ : ∃ (K : set G), is_compact K ∧ (1 : G) ∈ interior K,
{ rcases exists_compact_subset is_open_univ (mem_univ (1 : G)) with ⟨K, hK⟩,
exact ⟨K, hK.1, hK.2.1⟩ },
have K_inf : set.infinite K := infinite_of_mem_nhds (1 : G) (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 K_int),
have μKlt : μ K ≠ ∞ := K_compact.measure_lt_top.ne,
have I : ∀ (n : ℕ), μ {(1 : G)} ≤ μ K / n,
{ assume n,
obtain ⟨t, tK, tn⟩ : ∃ (t : finset G), ↑t ⊆ K ∧ t.card = n := K_inf.exists_subset_card_eq n,
have A : μ t ≤ μ K := measure_mono tK,
have B : μ t = n * μ {(1 : G)},
{ rw ← bUnion_of_singleton ↑t,
change μ (⋃ (x ∈ t), {x}) = n * μ {1},
rw @measure_bUnion_finset G G _ μ t (λ i, {i}),
{ simp only [tn, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, haar_singleton] },
{ assume x hx y hy xy,
simp only [on_fun, xy.symm, mem_singleton_iff, not_false_iff, disjoint_singleton_right] },
{ assume b hb, exact measurable_set_singleton b } },
rw B at A,
rwa [ennreal.le_div_iff_mul_le _ (or.inr μKlt), mul_comm],
right,
apply (measure_pos_of_nonempty_interior μ ⟨_, K_int⟩).ne' },
have J : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), μ K / n) at_top (𝓝 (μ K / ∞)) :=
ennreal.tendsto.const_div ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top (or.inr μKlt),
simp only [ennreal.div_top] at J,
exact ge_of_tendsto' J I,
end
/- The above instance applies in particular to show that an additive Haar measure on a nontrivial
finite-dimensional real vector space has no atom. -/
example {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] [finite_dimensional ℝ E]
[measurable_space E] [borel_space E] (μ : measure E) [is_add_haar_measure μ] :
has_no_atoms μ := by apply_instance
end
end measure
end haar
end measure_theory
|
44d2b9fdd35d7835fa1a99f64fd83503bb3fbff8 | fecda8e6b848337561d6467a1e30cf23176d6ad0 | /src/ring_theory/unique_factorization_domain.lean | a830b2c3ea12e7fc8c05c086ab915737c8188fb5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | spolu/mathlib | bacf18c3d2a561d00ecdc9413187729dd1f705ed | 480c92cdfe1cf3c2d083abded87e82162e8814f4 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,684,094,325 | 1,600,736,045,000 | 1,600,736,045,000 | 297,564,749 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,600,758,368,000 | 1,600,758,367,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 42,695 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker, Aaron Anderson
-/
import algebra.gcd_monoid
import ring_theory.integral_domain
import ring_theory.noetherian
/--
# Unique Factorization
## Main Definitions
* `wf_dvd_monoid` holds for `monoid`s for which a strict divisibility relation is
well-founded.
* `unique_factorization_domain` carries the structure of prime factorization.
## To do
* Refactor `unique_factorization_domain` for `comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero`
* Redefine `unique_factorization_domain` as a predicate (`wf_dvd_monoid` and `irreducible_iff_prime`)
* set up the complete lattice structure on `factor_set`.
-/
variables {α : Type*}
local infix ` ~ᵤ ` : 50 := associated
/-- Well-foundedness of the strict version of |, which is equivalent to the descending chain
condition on divisibility and to the ascending chain condition on
principal ideals in an integral domain.
-/
class wf_dvd_monoid (α : Type*) [comm_monoid_with_zero α] : Prop :=
(well_founded_dvd_not_unit : well_founded (@dvd_not_unit α _))
export wf_dvd_monoid (well_founded_dvd_not_unit)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_noetherian_ring.wf_dvd_monoid [integral_domain α] [is_noetherian_ring α] :
wf_dvd_monoid α :=
⟨by { convert inv_image.wf (λ a, ideal.span ({a} : set α)) (well_founded_submodule_gt _ _),
ext,
exact ideal.span_singleton_lt_span_singleton.symm }⟩
instance polynomial.wf_dvd_monoid [integral_domain α] [wf_dvd_monoid α] : wf_dvd_monoid (polynomial α) :=
{ well_founded_dvd_not_unit := begin
classical,
refine rel_hom.well_founded
⟨λ p, (if p = 0 then ⊤ else ↑p.degree, p.leading_coeff), _⟩
(prod.lex_wf (with_top.well_founded_lt $ with_bot.well_founded_lt nat.lt_wf)
_inst_2.well_founded_dvd_not_unit),
rintros a b ⟨ane0, ⟨c, ⟨not_unit_c, rfl⟩⟩⟩,
rw [polynomial.degree_mul, if_neg ane0],
split_ifs with hac,
{ rw [hac, polynomial.leading_coeff_zero],
apply prod.lex.left,
exact lt_of_le_of_ne le_top with_top.coe_ne_top },
have cne0 : c ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul hac,
simp only [cne0, ane0, polynomial.leading_coeff_mul],
by_cases hdeg : c.degree = 0,
{ simp only [hdeg, add_zero],
refine prod.lex.right _ ⟨_, ⟨c.leading_coeff, (λ unit_c, not_unit_c _), rfl⟩⟩,
{ rwa [ne, polynomial.leading_coeff_eq_zero] },
rw [polynomial.is_unit_iff, polynomial.eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero hdeg],
use [c.leading_coeff, unit_c],
rw [polynomial.leading_coeff, polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hdeg] },
{ apply prod.lex.left,
rw polynomial.degree_eq_nat_degree cne0 at *,
rw [with_top.coe_lt_coe, polynomial.degree_eq_nat_degree ane0,
← with_bot.coe_add, with_bot.coe_lt_coe],
exact lt_add_of_pos_right _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, hdeg (h.symm ▸ with_bot.coe_zero))) },
end }
namespace wf_dvd_monoid
variables [comm_monoid_with_zero α]
open associates nat
theorem of_wf_dvd_monoid_associates (h : wf_dvd_monoid (associates α)): wf_dvd_monoid α :=
⟨begin
haveI := h,
refine (surjective.well_founded_iff mk_surjective _).2 wf_dvd_monoid.well_founded_dvd_not_unit,
intros, rw mk_dvd_not_unit_mk_iff
end⟩
variables [wf_dvd_monoid α]
instance wf_dvd_monoid_associates : wf_dvd_monoid (associates α) :=
⟨begin
refine (surjective.well_founded_iff mk_surjective _).1 wf_dvd_monoid.well_founded_dvd_not_unit,
intros, rw mk_dvd_not_unit_mk_iff
end⟩
theorem well_founded_associates : well_founded ((<) : associates α → associates α → Prop) :=
subrelation.wf (λ x y, dvd_not_unit_of_lt) wf_dvd_monoid.well_founded_dvd_not_unit
local attribute [elab_as_eliminator] well_founded.fix
lemma exists_irreducible_factor {a : α} (ha : ¬ is_unit a) (ha0 : a ≠ 0) :
∃ i, irreducible i ∧ i ∣ a :=
(irreducible_or_factor a ha).elim (λ hai, ⟨a, hai, dvd_refl _⟩)
(well_founded.fix
wf_dvd_monoid.well_founded_dvd_not_unit
(λ a ih ha ha0 ⟨x, y, hx, hy, hxy⟩,
have hx0 : x ≠ 0, from λ hx0, ha0 (by rw [← hxy, hx0, zero_mul]),
(irreducible_or_factor x hx).elim
(λ hxi, ⟨x, hxi, hxy ▸ by simp⟩)
(λ hxf, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := ih x ⟨hx0, y, hy, hxy.symm⟩ hx hx0 hxf in
⟨i, hi.1, dvd.trans hi.2 (hxy ▸ by simp)⟩)) a ha ha0)
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma induction_on_irreducible {P : α → Prop} (a : α)
(h0 : P 0) (hu : ∀ u : α, is_unit u → P u)
(hi : ∀ a i : α, a ≠ 0 → irreducible i → P a → P (i * a)) :
P a :=
by haveI := classical.dec; exact
well_founded.fix wf_dvd_monoid.well_founded_dvd_not_unit
(λ a ih, if ha0 : a = 0 then ha0.symm ▸ h0
else if hau : is_unit a then hu a hau
else let ⟨i, hii, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ := exists_irreducible_factor hau ha0 in
have hb0 : b ≠ 0, from λ hb0, by simp * at *,
hb.symm ▸ hi _ _ hb0 hii (ih _ ⟨hb0, i,
hii.1, by rw [hb, mul_comm]⟩))
a
lemma exists_factors (a : α) : a ≠ 0 →
∃f : multiset α, (∀b ∈ f, irreducible b) ∧ associated a f.prod :=
wf_dvd_monoid.induction_on_irreducible a
(λ h, (h rfl).elim)
(λ u hu _, ⟨0, by simp [associated_one_iff_is_unit, hu]⟩)
(λ a i ha0 hii ih hia0,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := ih ha0 in
⟨i::s, ⟨by clear _let_match; finish,
by { rw multiset.prod_cons,
exact associated_mul_mul (by refl) hs.2 }⟩⟩)
end wf_dvd_monoid
theorem wf_dvd_monoid.of_well_founded_associates [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α]
(h : well_founded ((<) : associates α → associates α → Prop)) : wf_dvd_monoid α :=
wf_dvd_monoid.of_wf_dvd_monoid_associates ⟨by { convert h, ext, exact associates.dvd_not_unit_iff_lt }⟩
theorem wf_dvd_monoid.iff_well_founded_associates [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero α] :
wf_dvd_monoid α ↔ well_founded ((<) : associates α → associates α → Prop) :=
⟨by apply wf_dvd_monoid.well_founded_associates, wf_dvd_monoid.of_well_founded_associates⟩
/-- Unique factorization domains.
In a unique factorization domain each element (except zero) is uniquely
represented as a multiset of irreducible factors.
Uniqueness is only up to associated elements.
This is equivalent to defining a unique factorization domain as a domain in
which each element (except zero) is non-uniquely represented as a multiset
of prime factors. This definition is used.
To define a UFD using the traditional definition in terms of multisets
of irreducible factors, use the definition `of_unique_irreducible_factorization`
-/
class unique_factorization_domain (α : Type*) [integral_domain α] :=
(factors : α → multiset α)
(factors_prod : ∀{a : α}, a ≠ 0 → (factors a).prod ~ᵤ a)
(prime_factors : ∀{a : α}, a ≠ 0 → ∀x∈factors a, prime x)
namespace unique_factorization_domain
variables [integral_domain α] [unique_factorization_domain α]
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma induction_on_prime {P : α → Prop}
(a : α) (h₁ : P 0) (h₂ : ∀ x : α, is_unit x → P x)
(h₃ : ∀ a p : α, a ≠ 0 → prime p → P a → P (p * a)) : P a :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
if ha0 : a = 0 then ha0.symm ▸ h₁
else @multiset.induction_on _
(λ s : multiset α, ∀ (a : α), a ≠ 0 → s.prod ~ᵤ a → (∀ p ∈ s, prime p) → P a)
(factors a)
(λ _ _ h _, h₂ _ ((is_unit_iff_of_associated h.symm).2 is_unit_one))
(λ p s ih a ha0 ⟨u, hu⟩ hsp,
have ha : a = (p * u) * s.prod, by simp [hu.symm, mul_comm, mul_assoc],
have hs0 : s.prod ≠ 0, from λ _ : s.prod = 0, by simp * at *,
ha.symm ▸ h₃ _ _ hs0
(prime_of_associated ⟨u, rfl⟩ (hsp p (multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)))
(ih _ hs0 (by refl) (λ p hp, hsp p (multiset.mem_cons.2 (or.inr hp)))))
_
ha0
(factors_prod ha0)
(prime_factors ha0)
lemma factors_irreducible {a : α} (ha : irreducible a) :
∃ p, a ~ᵤ p ∧ factors a = p :: 0 :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
multiset.induction_on (factors a)
(λ h, (ha.1 (associated_one_iff_is_unit.1 h.symm)).elim)
(λ p s _ hp hs, let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hp in ⟨p,
have hs0 : s = 0, from classical.by_contradiction
(λ hs0, let ⟨q, hq⟩ := multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero hs0 in
(hs q (by simp [hq])).2.1 $
(ha.2 ((p * u) * (s.erase q).prod) _
(by rw [mul_right_comm _ _ q, mul_assoc, ← multiset.prod_cons,
multiset.cons_erase hq]; simp [hu.symm, mul_comm, mul_assoc])).resolve_left $
mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left $ mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left
(hs p (multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)).2.1),
⟨associated.symm (by clear _let_match; simp * at *), hs0 ▸ rfl⟩⟩)
(factors_prod ha.ne_zero)
(prime_factors ha.ne_zero)
lemma irreducible_iff_prime {p : α} : irreducible p ↔ prime p :=
by letI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
if hp0 : p = 0 then by simp [hp0]
else
⟨λ h, let ⟨q, hq⟩ := factors_irreducible h in
have prime q, from hq.2 ▸ prime_factors hp0 _ (by simp [hq.2]),
suffices prime (factors p).prod,
from prime_of_associated (factors_prod hp0) this,
hq.2.symm ▸ by simp [this],
irreducible_of_prime⟩
lemma irreducible_factors : ∀{a : α}, a ≠ 0 → ∀x∈factors a, irreducible x :=
by simp only [irreducible_iff_prime]; exact @prime_factors _ _ _
lemma unique : ∀{f g : multiset α},
(∀x∈f, irreducible x) → (∀x∈g, irreducible x) → f.prod ~ᵤ g.prod →
multiset.rel associated f g :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
λ f, multiset.induction_on f
(λ g _ hg h,
multiset.rel_zero_left.2 $
multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem (λ x hx,
have is_unit g.prod, by simpa [associated_one_iff_is_unit] using h.symm,
(hg x hx).1 (is_unit_iff_dvd_one.2 (dvd.trans (multiset.dvd_prod hx)
(is_unit_iff_dvd_one.1 this)))))
(λ p f ih g hf hg hfg,
let ⟨b, hbg, hb⟩ := exists_associated_mem_of_dvd_prod
(irreducible_iff_prime.1 (hf p (by simp)))
(λ q hq, irreducible_iff_prime.1 (hg _ hq)) $
(dvd_iff_dvd_of_rel_right hfg).1
(show p ∣ (p :: f).prod, by simp) in
begin
rw ← multiset.cons_erase hbg,
exact multiset.rel.cons hb (ih (λ q hq, hf _ (by simp [hq]))
(λ q (hq : q ∈ g.erase b), hg q (multiset.mem_of_mem_erase hq))
(associated_mul_left_cancel
(by rwa [← multiset.prod_cons, ← multiset.prod_cons, multiset.cons_erase hbg]) hb
(hf p (by simp)).ne_zero))
end)
end unique_factorization_domain
/-- Definition of a UFD as an integral domain in which each non-zero element can be uniquely
represented by a multisets of irreducible factors. Uniqueness is only up to associated elements. -/
structure unique_irreducible_factorization (α : Type*) [integral_domain α] :=
(factors : α → multiset α)
(factors_prod : ∀{a : α}, a ≠ 0 → (factors a).prod ~ᵤ a)
(irreducible_factors : ∀{a : α}, a ≠ 0 → ∀x∈factors a, irreducible x)
(unique : ∀{f g : multiset α},
(∀x∈f, irreducible x) → (∀x∈g, irreducible x) → f.prod ~ᵤ g.prod → multiset.rel associated f g)
namespace unique_factorization_domain
open unique_factorization_domain associated
variables [integral_domain α] [unique_factorization_domain α]
lemma exists_mem_factors_of_dvd {a p : α} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hp : irreducible p) : p ∣ a →
∃ q ∈ factors a, p ~ᵤ q :=
λ ⟨b, hb⟩,
have hb0 : b ≠ 0, from λ hb0, by simp * at *,
have multiset.rel associated (p :: factors b) (factors a),
from unique
(λ x hx, (multiset.mem_cons.1 hx).elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hp)
(irreducible_factors hb0 _))
(irreducible_factors ha0)
(associated.symm $ calc multiset.prod (factors a) ~ᵤ a : factors_prod ha0
... = p * b : hb
... ~ᵤ multiset.prod (p :: factors b) :
by rw multiset.prod_cons; exact associated_mul_mul
(associated.refl _)
(associated.symm (factors_prod hb0))),
multiset.exists_mem_of_rel_of_mem this (by simp)
/-- Go from unique factorization defined in terms of non-unique multisets of prime factors to the
more traditional definition in terms of unique (up to association) multisets of irreducible factors.
-/
def of_unique_irreducible_factorization {α : Type*} [integral_domain α]
(o : unique_irreducible_factorization α) : unique_factorization_domain α :=
{ prime_factors := by letI := classical.dec_eq α; exact λ a h p (hpa : p ∈ o.factors a),
have hpi : irreducible p, from o.irreducible_factors h _ hpa,
⟨hpi.ne_zero, hpi.1,
λ a b ⟨x, hx⟩,
if hab0 : a * b = 0
then (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hab0).elim
(λ ha0, by simp [ha0])
(λ hb0, by simp [hb0])
else
have hx0 : x ≠ 0, from λ hx0, by simp * at *,
have ha0 : a ≠ 0, from left_ne_zero_of_mul hab0,
have hb0 : b ≠ 0, from right_ne_zero_of_mul hab0,
have multiset.rel associated (p :: o.factors x) (o.factors a + o.factors b),
from o.unique
(λ i hi, (multiset.mem_cons.1 hi).elim
(λ hip, hip.symm ▸ hpi)
(o.irreducible_factors hx0 _))
(show ∀ x ∈ o.factors a + o.factors b, irreducible x,
from λ x hx, (multiset.mem_add.1 hx).elim
(o.irreducible_factors ha0 _)
(o.irreducible_factors hb0 _)) $
calc multiset.prod (p :: o.factors x)
~ᵤ a * b : by rw [hx, multiset.prod_cons];
exact associated_mul_mul (by refl)
(o.factors_prod hx0)
... ~ᵤ (o.factors a).prod * (o.factors b).prod :
associated_mul_mul
(o.factors_prod ha0).symm
(o.factors_prod hb0).symm
... = _ : by rw multiset.prod_add,
let ⟨q, hqf, hq⟩ := multiset.exists_mem_of_rel_of_mem this
(multiset.mem_cons_self p _) in
(multiset.mem_add.1 hqf).elim
(λ hqa, or.inl $ (dvd_iff_dvd_of_rel_left hq).2 $
(dvd_iff_dvd_of_rel_right (o.factors_prod ha0)).1
(multiset.dvd_prod hqa))
(λ hqb, or.inr $ (dvd_iff_dvd_of_rel_left hq).2 $
(dvd_iff_dvd_of_rel_right (o.factors_prod hb0)).1
(multiset.dvd_prod hqb))⟩,
..o }
end unique_factorization_domain
namespace associates
open unique_factorization_domain associated
variables [integral_domain α]
/-- `factor_set α` representation elements of unique factorization domain as multisets.
`multiset α` produced by `factors` are only unique up to associated elements, while the multisets in
`factor_set α` are unqiue by equality and restricted to irreducible elements. This gives us a
representation of each element as a unique multisets (or the added ⊤ for 0), which has a complete
lattice struture. Infimum is the greatest common divisor and supremum is the least common multiple.
-/
@[reducible] def {u} factor_set (α : Type u) [integral_domain α] :
Type u :=
with_top (multiset { a : associates α // irreducible a })
local attribute [instance] associated.setoid
theorem factor_set.coe_add {a b : multiset { a : associates α // irreducible a }} :
(↑(a + b) : factor_set α) = a + b :=
by norm_cast
lemma factor_set.sup_add_inf_eq_add [decidable_eq (associates α)] :
∀(a b : factor_set α), a ⊔ b + a ⊓ b = a + b
| none b := show ⊤ ⊔ b + ⊤ ⊓ b = ⊤ + b, by simp
| a none := show a ⊔ ⊤ + a ⊓ ⊤ = a + ⊤, by simp
| (some a) (some b) := show (a : factor_set α) ⊔ b + a ⊓ b = a + b, from
begin
rw [← with_top.coe_sup, ← with_top.coe_inf, ← with_top.coe_add, ← with_top.coe_add,
with_top.coe_eq_coe],
exact multiset.union_add_inter _ _
end
/-- The product of the elements of a factor_set -/
def factor_set.prod : factor_set α → associates α
| none := 0
| (some s) := (s.map coe).prod
@[simp] theorem prod_top : (⊤ : factor_set α).prod = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem prod_coe {s : multiset { a : associates α // irreducible a }} :
(s : factor_set α).prod = (s.map coe).prod :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem prod_add : ∀(a b : factor_set α), (a + b).prod = a.prod * b.prod
| none b := show (⊤ + b).prod = (⊤:factor_set α).prod * b.prod, by simp
| a none := show (a + ⊤).prod = a.prod * (⊤:factor_set α).prod, by simp
| (some a) (some b) :=
show (↑a + ↑b:factor_set α).prod = (↑a:factor_set α).prod * (↑b:factor_set α).prod,
by rw [← factor_set.coe_add, prod_coe, prod_coe, prod_coe, multiset.map_add, multiset.prod_add]
theorem prod_mono : ∀{a b : factor_set α}, a ≤ b → a.prod ≤ b.prod
| none b h := have b = ⊤, from top_unique h, by rw [this, prod_top]; exact le_refl _
| a none h := show a.prod ≤ (⊤ : factor_set α).prod, by simp; exact le_top
| (some a) (some b) h := prod_le_prod $ multiset.map_le_map $ with_top.coe_le_coe.1 $ h
/-- `bcount p s` is the multiplicity of `p` in the factor_set `s` (with bundled `p`)-/
def bcount [decidable_eq (associates α)] (p : {a : associates α // irreducible a}) :
factor_set α → ℕ
| none := 0
| (some s) := s.count p
variables [dec_irr : Π (p : associates α), decidable (irreducible p)]
include dec_irr
/-- `count p s` is the multiplicity of the irreducible `p` in the factor_set `s`.
If `p` is not irreducible, `count p s` is defined to be `0`. -/
def count [decidable_eq (associates α)] (p : associates α) :
factor_set α → ℕ :=
if hp : irreducible p then bcount ⟨p, hp⟩ else 0
@[simp] lemma count_some [decidable_eq (associates α)] {p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p)
(s : multiset _) : count p (some s) = s.count ⟨p, hp⟩:=
by { dunfold count, split_ifs, refl }
@[simp] lemma count_zero [decidable_eq (associates α)] {p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p) :
count p (0 : factor_set α) = 0 :=
by { dunfold count, split_ifs, refl }
lemma count_reducible [decidable_eq (associates α)] {p : associates α} (hp : ¬ irreducible p) :
count p = 0 := dif_neg hp
omit dec_irr
/-- membership in a factor_set (bundled version) -/
def bfactor_set_mem : {a : associates α // irreducible a} → (factor_set α) → Prop
| _ ⊤ := true
| p (some l) := p ∈ l
include dec_irr
/-- `factor_set_mem p s` is the predicate that the irreducible `p` is a member of `s : factor_set α`.
If `p` is not irreducible, `p` is not a member of any `factor_set`. -/
def factor_set_mem (p : associates α) (s : factor_set α) : Prop :=
if hp : irreducible p then bfactor_set_mem ⟨p, hp⟩ s else false
instance : has_mem (associates α) (factor_set α) := ⟨factor_set_mem⟩
@[simp] lemma factor_set_mem_eq_mem (p : associates α) (s : factor_set α) :
factor_set_mem p s = (p ∈ s) := rfl
lemma mem_factor_set_top {p : associates α} {hp : irreducible p} :
p ∈ (⊤ : factor_set α) :=
begin
dunfold has_mem.mem, dunfold factor_set_mem, split_ifs, exact trivial
end
lemma mem_factor_set_some {p : associates α} {hp : irreducible p}
{l : multiset {a : associates α // irreducible a }} :
p ∈ (l : factor_set α) ↔ subtype.mk p hp ∈ l :=
begin
dunfold has_mem.mem, dunfold factor_set_mem, split_ifs, refl
end
lemma reducible_not_mem_factor_set {p : associates α} (hp : ¬ irreducible p)
(s : factor_set α) : ¬ p ∈ s :=
λ (h : if hp : irreducible p then bfactor_set_mem ⟨p, hp⟩ s else false),
by rwa [dif_neg hp] at h
omit dec_irr
variable [unique_factorization_domain α]
theorem unique' {p q : multiset (associates α)} :
(∀a∈p, irreducible a) → (∀a∈q, irreducible a) → p.prod = q.prod → p = q :=
begin
apply multiset.induction_on_multiset_quot p,
apply multiset.induction_on_multiset_quot q,
assume s t hs ht eq,
refine multiset.map_mk_eq_map_mk_of_rel (unique_factorization_domain.unique _ _ _),
{ exact assume a ha, ((irreducible_mk _).1 $ hs _ $ multiset.mem_map_of_mem _ ha) },
{ exact assume a ha, ((irreducible_mk _).1 $ ht _ $ multiset.mem_map_of_mem _ ha) },
simpa [quot_mk_eq_mk, prod_mk, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated] using eq
end
private theorem forall_map_mk_factors_irreducible (x : α) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∀(a : associates α), a ∈ multiset.map associates.mk (factors x) → irreducible a :=
begin
assume a ha,
rcases multiset.mem_map.1 ha with ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩,
exact (irreducible_mk c).2 (irreducible_factors hx _ hc)
end
theorem prod_le_prod_iff_le {p q : multiset (associates α)}
(hp : ∀a∈p, irreducible a) (hq : ∀a∈q, irreducible a) :
p.prod ≤ q.prod ↔ p ≤ q :=
iff.intro
begin
rintros ⟨⟨c⟩, eqc⟩,
have : c ≠ 0, from (mt mk_eq_zero.2 $
assume (hc : quot.mk setoid.r c = 0),
have (0 : associates α) ∈ q, from prod_eq_zero_iff.1 $ eqc.symm ▸ hc.symm ▸ mul_zero _,
not_irreducible_zero ((irreducible_mk 0).1 $ hq _ this)),
have : associates.mk (factors c).prod = quot.mk setoid.r c,
from mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (factors_prod this),
refine le_iff_exists_add.2 ⟨(factors c).map associates.mk, unique' hq _ _⟩,
{ assume x hx,
rcases multiset.mem_add.1 hx with h | h,
exact hp x h,
exact forall_map_mk_factors_irreducible c ‹c ≠ 0› _ h },
{ simp [multiset.prod_add, prod_mk, *] at * }
end
prod_le_prod
/-- The multiset of associates of irreducible factors of a non-zero element. -/
def factors' (a : α) (ha : a ≠ 0) : multiset { a : associates α // irreducible a } :=
(factors a).pmap (λa ha, ⟨associates.mk a, (irreducible_mk _).2 ha⟩)
(irreducible_factors $ ha)
@[simp] theorem map_subtype_coe_factors' {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(factors' a ha).map coe = (factors a).map associates.mk :=
by simp [factors', multiset.map_pmap, multiset.pmap_eq_map]
theorem factors'_cong {a b : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a ~ᵤ b) :
factors' a ha = factors' b hb :=
have multiset.rel associated (factors a) (factors b), from
unique (irreducible_factors ha) (irreducible_factors hb)
((factors_prod ha).trans $ h.trans $ (factors_prod hb).symm),
by simpa [(multiset.map_eq_map subtype.coe_injective).symm, rel_associated_iff_map_eq_map.symm]
variable [dec : decidable_eq (associates α)]
include dec
/-- The factor_set of irreducible factors of an element -/
def factors (a : associates α) : factor_set α :=
begin
refine (if h : a = 0 then ⊤ else
quotient.hrec_on a (λx h, some $ factors' x (mt mk_eq_zero.2 h)) _ h),
assume a b hab,
apply function.hfunext,
{ have : a ~ᵤ 0 ↔ b ~ᵤ 0, from
iff.intro (assume ha0, hab.symm.trans ha0) (assume hb0, hab.trans hb0),
simp only [associated_zero_iff_eq_zero] at this,
simp only [quotient_mk_eq_mk, this, mk_eq_zero] },
exact (assume ha hb eq, heq_of_eq $ congr_arg some $ factors'_cong _ _ hab)
end
@[simp] theorem factors_0 : (0 : associates α).factors = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem factors_mk (a : α) (h : a ≠ 0) : (associates.mk a).factors = factors' a h :=
dif_neg (mt mk_eq_zero.1 h)
theorem prod_factors : ∀(s : factor_set α), s.prod.factors = s
| none := by simp [factor_set.prod]; refl
| (some s) :=
begin
unfold factor_set.prod,
generalize eq_a : (s.map coe).prod = a,
rcases a with ⟨a⟩,
rw quot_mk_eq_mk at *,
have : (s.map (coe : _ → associates α)).prod ≠ 0, from assume ha,
let ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, h, eq⟩ := multiset.mem_map.1 (prod_eq_zero_iff.1 ha) in
have irreducible (0 : associates α), from eq ▸ ha,
not_irreducible_zero ((irreducible_mk _).1 this),
have ha : a ≠ 0, by simp [*] at *,
suffices : (unique_factorization_domain.factors a).map associates.mk = s.map coe,
{ rw [factors_mk a ha],
apply congr_arg some _,
simpa [(multiset.map_eq_map subtype.coe_injective).symm] },
refine unique'
(forall_map_mk_factors_irreducible _ ha)
(assume a ha, let ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ha, eq⟩ := multiset.mem_map.1 ha in eq ▸ hx)
_,
rw [prod_mk, eq_a, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated],
exact factors_prod ha
end
theorem factors_prod (a : associates α) : a.factors.prod = a :=
quotient.induction_on a $ assume a, decidable.by_cases
(assume : associates.mk a = 0, by simp [quotient_mk_eq_mk, this])
(assume : associates.mk a ≠ 0,
have a ≠ 0, by simp * at *,
by simp [this, quotient_mk_eq_mk, prod_mk, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (factors_prod this)])
theorem eq_of_factors_eq_factors {a b : associates α} (h : a.factors = b.factors) : a = b :=
have a.factors.prod = b.factors.prod, by rw h,
by rwa [factors_prod, factors_prod] at this
omit dec
theorem eq_of_prod_eq_prod {a b : factor_set α} (h : a.prod = b.prod) : a = b :=
begin
classical,
have : a.prod.factors = b.prod.factors, by rw h,
rwa [prod_factors, prod_factors] at this
end
include dec
@[simp] theorem factors_mul (a b : associates α) : (a * b).factors = a.factors + b.factors :=
eq_of_prod_eq_prod $ eq_of_factors_eq_factors $
by rw [prod_add, factors_prod, factors_prod, factors_prod]
theorem factors_mono : ∀{a b : associates α}, a ≤ b → a.factors ≤ b.factors
| s t ⟨d, rfl⟩ := by rw [factors_mul] ; exact le_add_of_nonneg_right bot_le
theorem factors_le {a b : associates α} : a.factors ≤ b.factors ↔ a ≤ b :=
iff.intro
(assume h, have a.factors.prod ≤ b.factors.prod, from prod_mono h,
by rwa [factors_prod, factors_prod] at this)
factors_mono
omit dec
theorem prod_le {a b : factor_set α} : a.prod ≤ b.prod ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
classical,
exact iff.intro
(assume h, have a.prod.factors ≤ b.prod.factors, from factors_mono h,
by rwa [prod_factors, prod_factors] at this)
prod_mono
end
include dec
instance : has_sup (associates α) := ⟨λa b, (a.factors ⊔ b.factors).prod⟩
instance : has_inf (associates α) := ⟨λa b, (a.factors ⊓ b.factors).prod⟩
instance : bounded_lattice (associates α) :=
{ sup := (⊔),
inf := (⊓),
sup_le :=
assume a b c hac hbc, factors_prod c ▸ prod_mono (sup_le (factors_mono hac) (factors_mono hbc)),
le_sup_left := assume a b,
le_trans (le_of_eq (factors_prod a).symm) $ prod_mono $ le_sup_left,
le_sup_right := assume a b,
le_trans (le_of_eq (factors_prod b).symm) $ prod_mono $ le_sup_right,
le_inf :=
assume a b c hac hbc, factors_prod a ▸ prod_mono (le_inf (factors_mono hac) (factors_mono hbc)),
inf_le_left := assume a b,
le_trans (prod_mono inf_le_left) (le_of_eq (factors_prod a)),
inf_le_right := assume a b,
le_trans (prod_mono inf_le_right) (le_of_eq (factors_prod b)),
.. associates.partial_order,
.. associates.order_top,
.. associates.order_bot }
lemma sup_mul_inf (a b : associates α) : (a ⊔ b) * (a ⊓ b) = a * b :=
show (a.factors ⊔ b.factors).prod * (a.factors ⊓ b.factors).prod = a * b,
begin
refine eq_of_factors_eq_factors _,
rw [← prod_add, prod_factors, factors_mul, factor_set.sup_add_inf_eq_add]
end
include dec_irr
lemma dvd_of_mem_factors {a p : associates α} {hp : irreducible p}
(hm : p ∈ factors a) : p ∣ a :=
begin
by_cases ha0 : a = 0, { rw ha0, exact dvd_zero p },
obtain ⟨a0, nza, ha'⟩ := exists_non_zero_rep ha0,
rw [← associates.factors_prod a],
rw [← ha', factors_mk a0 nza] at hm ⊢,
erw prod_coe,
apply multiset.dvd_prod, apply multiset.mem_map.mpr,
exact ⟨⟨p, hp⟩, mem_factor_set_some.mp hm, rfl⟩
end
omit dec
omit dec_irr
lemma dvd_of_mem_factors' {a : α} {p : associates α} {hp : irreducible p} {hz : a ≠ 0}
(h_mem : subtype.mk p hp ∈ factors' a hz) : p ∣ associates.mk a :=
by { classical, apply @dvd_of_mem_factors _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hp, rw factors_mk _ hz,
exact mem_factor_set_some.mpr h_mem }
lemma mem_factors'_of_dvd {a p : α} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hp : irreducible p) (hd : p ∣ a) :
subtype.mk (associates.mk p) ((irreducible_mk _).2 hp) ∈ factors' a ha0 :=
begin
obtain ⟨q, hq, hpq⟩ := exists_mem_factors_of_dvd ha0 hp hd,
apply multiset.mem_pmap.mpr, use q, use hq,
exact subtype.eq (eq.symm (mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.mpr hpq))
end
lemma mem_factors'_iff_dvd {a p : α} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hp : irreducible p) :
subtype.mk (associates.mk p) ((irreducible_mk _).2 hp) ∈ factors' a ha0 ↔ p ∣ a :=
begin
split,
{ rw ← mk_dvd_mk, exact dvd_of_mem_factors' },
{ apply mem_factors'_of_dvd }
end
lemma associates_irreducible_iff_prime : ∀{p : associates α}, irreducible p ↔ prime p :=
associates.forall_associated.2 $ assume a,
by rw [associates.irreducible_mk, associates.prime_mk, irreducible_iff_prime]
include dec
include dec_irr
lemma mem_factors_of_dvd {a p : α} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hp : irreducible p) (hd : p ∣ a) :
(associates.mk p) ∈ factors (associates.mk a) :=
begin
rw factors_mk _ ha0, exact mem_factor_set_some.mpr (mem_factors'_of_dvd ha0 hp hd)
end
lemma mem_factors_iff_dvd {a p : α} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hp : irreducible p) :
(associates.mk p) ∈ factors (associates.mk a) ↔ p ∣ a :=
begin
split,
{ rw ← mk_dvd_mk, apply dvd_of_mem_factors, exact (irreducible_mk p).mpr hp },
{ apply mem_factors_of_dvd ha0 hp }
end
omit dec_irr
lemma exists_prime_dvd_of_not_inf_one {a b : α}
(ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : (associates.mk a) ⊓ (associates.mk b) ≠ 1) :
∃ (p : α), prime p ∧ p ∣ a ∧ p ∣ b :=
begin
have hz : (factors (associates.mk a)) ⊓ (factors (associates.mk b)) ≠ 0,
{ contrapose! h with hf,
change ((factors (associates.mk a)) ⊓ (factors (associates.mk b))).prod = 1,
rw hf,
exact multiset.prod_zero },
rw [factors_mk a ha, factors_mk b hb, ← with_top.coe_inf] at hz,
obtain ⟨⟨p0, p0_irr⟩, p0_mem⟩ := multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero ((mt with_top.coe_eq_coe.mpr) hz),
rw multiset.inf_eq_inter at p0_mem,
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ : ∃ p, associates.mk p = p0 := quot.exists_rep p0,
refine ⟨p, _, _, _⟩,
{ rw [← irreducible_iff_prime, ← irreducible_mk],
exact p0_irr },
{ apply dvd_of_mk_le_mk,
exact dvd_of_mem_factors' (multiset.mem_inter.mp p0_mem).left },
{ apply dvd_of_mk_le_mk,
exact dvd_of_mem_factors' (multiset.mem_inter.mp p0_mem).right }
end
theorem coprime_iff_inf_one {a b : α} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(associates.mk a) ⊓ (associates.mk b) = 1 ↔ ∀ {d : α}, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d :=
begin
split,
{ intros hg p ha hb hp,
refine ((associates.prime_mk _).mpr hp).not_unit (is_unit_of_dvd_one _ _),
rw ← hg,
exact le_inf (mk_le_mk_of_dvd ha) (mk_le_mk_of_dvd hb) },
{ contrapose,
intros hg hc,
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpa, hpb⟩ := exists_prime_dvd_of_not_inf_one ha0 hb0 hg,
exact hc hpa hpb hp }
end
theorem factors_prime_pow {p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p)
(k : ℕ) : factors (p ^ k) = some (multiset.repeat ⟨p, hp⟩ k) :=
eq_of_prod_eq_prod (by rw [associates.factors_prod, factor_set.prod, multiset.map_repeat,
multiset.prod_repeat, subtype.coe_mk])
include dec_irr
theorem prime_pow_dvd_iff_le {m p : associates α} (h₁ : m ≠ 0)
(h₂ : irreducible p) {k : ℕ} : p ^ k ≤ m ↔ k ≤ count p m.factors :=
begin
obtain ⟨a, nz, rfl⟩ := associates.exists_non_zero_rep h₁,
rw [factors_mk _ nz, ← with_top.some_eq_coe, count_some, multiset.le_count_iff_repeat_le,
← factors_le, factors_prime_pow h₂, factors_mk _ nz],
exact with_top.coe_le_coe
end
theorem le_of_count_ne_zero {m p : associates α} (h0 : m ≠ 0)
(hp : irreducible p) : count p m.factors ≠ 0 → p ≤ m :=
begin
rw [← nat.pos_iff_ne_zero],
intro h,
rw [← pow_one p],
apply (prime_pow_dvd_iff_le h0 hp).2,
simpa only
end
theorem count_mul {a : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) {b : associates α} (hb : b ≠ 0)
{p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p) :
count p (factors (a * b)) = count p a.factors + count p b.factors :=
begin
obtain ⟨a0, nza, ha'⟩ := exists_non_zero_rep ha,
obtain ⟨b0, nzb, hb'⟩ := exists_non_zero_rep hb,
rw [factors_mul, ← ha', ← hb', factors_mk a0 nza, factors_mk b0 nzb, ← factor_set.coe_add,
← with_top.some_eq_coe, ← with_top.some_eq_coe, ← with_top.some_eq_coe, count_some hp,
multiset.count_add, count_some hp, count_some hp]
end
theorem count_of_coprime {a : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) {b : associates α} (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hab : ∀ d, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d) {p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p) :
count p a.factors = 0 ∨ count p b.factors = 0 :=
begin
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, ← ne.def],
intro hca,
contrapose! hab with hcb,
exact ⟨p, le_of_count_ne_zero ha hp hca, le_of_count_ne_zero hb hp hcb,
(associates_irreducible_iff_prime.mp hp)⟩,
end
theorem count_mul_of_coprime {a : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) {b : associates α} (hb : b ≠ 0)
{p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p) (hab : ∀ d, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d) :
count p a.factors = 0 ∨ count p a.factors = count p (a * b).factors :=
begin
cases count_of_coprime ha hb hab hp with hz hb0, { tauto },
apply or.intro_right,
rw [count_mul ha hb hp, hb0, add_zero]
end
theorem count_mul_of_coprime' {a : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) {b : associates α} (hb : b ≠ 0)
{p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p) (hab : ∀ d, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d) :
count p (a * b).factors = count p a.factors
∨ count p (a * b).factors = count p b.factors :=
begin
rw [count_mul ha hb hp],
cases count_of_coprime ha hb hab hp with ha0 hb0,
{ apply or.intro_right, rw [ha0, zero_add] },
{ apply or.intro_left, rw [hb0, add_zero] }
end
theorem dvd_count_of_dvd_count_mul {a b : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
{p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p) (hab : ∀ d, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d)
{k : ℕ} (habk : k ∣ count p (a * b).factors) : k ∣ count p a.factors :=
begin
cases count_of_coprime ha hb hab hp with hz h,
{ rw hz, exact dvd_zero k },
{ rw [count_mul ha hb hp, h] at habk, exact habk }
end
omit dec_irr
@[simp] lemma factors_one : factors (1 : associates α) = 0 :=
begin
apply eq_of_prod_eq_prod,
rw associates.factors_prod,
exact multiset.prod_zero,
end
@[simp] theorem pow_factors {a : associates α} {k : ℕ} : (a ^ k).factors = k •ℕ a.factors :=
begin
induction k with n h,
{ rw [zero_nsmul, pow_zero], exact factors_one },
{ rw [pow_succ, succ_nsmul, factors_mul, h] }
end
include dec_irr
lemma count_pow {a : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) {p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p)
(k : ℕ) : count p (a ^ k).factors = k * count p a.factors :=
begin
induction k with n h,
{ rw [pow_zero, factors_one, zero_mul, count_zero hp] },
{ rw [pow_succ, count_mul ha (pow_ne_zero' _ ha) hp, h, nat.succ_eq_add_one], ring }
end
theorem dvd_count_pow {a : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) {p : associates α} (hp : irreducible p)
(k : ℕ) : k ∣ count p (a ^ k).factors := by { rw count_pow ha hp, apply dvd_mul_right }
theorem is_pow_of_dvd_count {a : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) {k : ℕ}
(hk : ∀ (p : associates α) (hp : irreducible p), k ∣ count p a.factors) :
∃ (b : associates α), a = b ^ k :=
begin
obtain ⟨a0, hz, rfl⟩ := exists_non_zero_rep ha,
rw [factors_mk a0 hz] at hk,
have hk' : ∀ (p : {a : associates α // irreducible a}), k ∣ (factors' a0 hz).count p,
{ intro p,
have pp : p = ⟨p.val, p.2⟩, { simp only [subtype.coe_eta, subtype.val_eq_coe] },
rw [pp, ← count_some p.2], exact hk p.val p.2 },
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := multiset.exists_smul_of_dvd_count _ hk',
use (u : factor_set α).prod,
apply eq_of_factors_eq_factors,
rw [pow_factors, prod_factors, factors_mk a0 hz, ← with_top.some_eq_coe, hu],
exact with_bot.coe_nsmul u k
end
omit dec
omit dec_irr
theorem eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow {a b c : associates α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hab : ∀ d, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d) {k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) :
∃ (d : associates α), a = d ^ k :=
begin
classical,
by_cases hk0 : k = 0,
{ use 1,
rw [hk0, pow_zero] at h ⊢,
apply (mul_eq_one_iff.1 h).1 },
{ refine is_pow_of_dvd_count ha _,
intros p hp,
apply dvd_count_of_dvd_count_mul ha hb hp hab,
rw h,
apply dvd_count_pow _ hp,
rintros rfl,
rw zero_pow' _ hk0 at h,
cases mul_eq_zero.mp h; contradiction }
end
end associates
section
open associates unique_factorization_domain
/-- `to_gcd_monoid` constructs a GCD monoid out of a normalization on a
unique factorization domain. -/
def unique_factorization_domain.to_gcd_monoid
(α : Type*) [integral_domain α] [unique_factorization_domain α] [normalization_monoid α]
[decidable_eq (associates α)] : gcd_monoid α :=
{ gcd := λa b, (associates.mk a ⊓ associates.mk b).out,
lcm := λa b, (associates.mk a ⊔ associates.mk b).out,
gcd_dvd_left := assume a b, (out_dvd_iff a (associates.mk a ⊓ associates.mk b)).2 $ inf_le_left,
gcd_dvd_right := assume a b, (out_dvd_iff b (associates.mk a ⊓ associates.mk b)).2 $ inf_le_right,
dvd_gcd := assume a b c hac hab, show a ∣ (associates.mk c ⊓ associates.mk b).out,
by rw [dvd_out_iff, le_inf_iff, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd_iff, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd_iff]; exact ⟨hac, hab⟩,
lcm_zero_left := assume a, show (⊤ ⊔ associates.mk a).out = 0, by simp,
lcm_zero_right := assume a, show (associates.mk a ⊔ ⊤).out = 0, by simp,
gcd_mul_lcm := assume a b,
show (associates.mk a ⊓ associates.mk b).out * (associates.mk a ⊔ associates.mk b).out =
normalize (a * b),
by rw [← out_mk, ← out_mul, mul_comm, sup_mul_inf]; refl,
normalize_gcd := assume a b, by convert normalize_out _,
.. ‹normalization_monoid α› }
end
namespace unique_factorization_domain
variables {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] [unique_factorization_domain R]
lemma no_factors_of_no_prime_factors {a b : R} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(h : (∀ {d}, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d)) : ∀ {d}, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → is_unit d :=
λ d, induction_on_prime d
(by { simp only [zero_dvd_iff], intros, contradiction })
(λ x hx _ _, hx)
(λ d q hp hq ih dvd_a dvd_b,
absurd hq (h (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd dvd_a) (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd dvd_b)))
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `a` and `c` have no common prime factors, `a ∣ b`.
Compare `is_coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left`. -/
lemma dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_no_prime_factors {a b c : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(∀ {d}, d ∣ a → d ∣ c → ¬ prime d) → a ∣ b * c → a ∣ b :=
begin
refine induction_on_prime c _ _ _,
{ intro no_factors,
simp only [dvd_zero, mul_zero, forall_prop_of_true],
haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
exact is_unit_iff_forall_dvd.mp
(no_factors_of_no_prime_factors ha @no_factors (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero a)) _ },
{ rintros _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ a_dvd_bx,
apply units.dvd_mul_right.mp a_dvd_bx },
{ intros c p hc hp ih no_factors a_dvd_bpc,
apply ih (λ q dvd_a dvd_c hq, no_factors dvd_a (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right dvd_c _) hq),
rw mul_left_comm at a_dvd_bpc,
refine or.resolve_left (left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_prime_mul hp a_dvd_bpc) (λ h, _),
exact no_factors h (dvd_mul_right p c) hp }
end
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `a` and `b` have no common prime factors, `a ∣ c`.
Compare `is_coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right`. -/
lemma dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors {a b c : R} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(no_factors : ∀ {d}, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d) : a ∣ b * c → a ∣ c :=
by simpa [mul_comm b c] using dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_no_prime_factors ha @no_factors
/-- If `a ≠ 0, b` are elements of a unique factorization domain, then dividing
out their common factor `c'` gives `a'` and `b'` with no factors in common. -/
lemma exists_reduced_factors : ∀ (a ≠ (0 : R)) b,
∃ a' b' c', (∀ {d}, d ∣ a' → d ∣ b' → is_unit d) ∧ c' * a' = a ∧ c' * b' = b :=
begin
haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
intros a,
refine induction_on_prime a _ _ _,
{ intros, contradiction },
{ intros a a_unit a_ne_zero b,
use [a, b, 1],
split,
{ intros p p_dvd_a _,
exact is_unit_of_dvd_unit p_dvd_a a_unit },
{ simp } },
{ intros a p a_ne_zero p_prime ih_a pa_ne_zero b,
by_cases p ∣ b,
{ rcases h with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
obtain ⟨a', b', c', no_factor, ha', hb'⟩ := ih_a a_ne_zero b,
refine ⟨a', b', p * c', @no_factor, _, _⟩,
{ rw [mul_assoc, ha'] },
{ rw [mul_assoc, hb'] } },
{ obtain ⟨a', b', c', coprime, rfl, rfl⟩ := ih_a a_ne_zero b,
refine ⟨p * a', b', c', _, mul_left_comm _ _ _, rfl⟩,
intros q q_dvd_pa' q_dvd_b',
cases left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_prime_mul p_prime q_dvd_pa' with p_dvd_q q_dvd_a',
{ have : p ∣ c' * b' := dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (dvd_trans p_dvd_q q_dvd_b') _,
contradiction },
exact coprime q_dvd_a' q_dvd_b' } }
end
lemma exists_reduced_factors' (a b : R) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ a' b' c', (∀ {d}, d ∣ a' → d ∣ b' → is_unit d) ∧ c' * a' = a ∧ c' * b' = b :=
let ⟨b', a', c', no_factor, hb, ha⟩ := exists_reduced_factors b hb a
in ⟨a', b', c', λ _ hpb hpa, no_factor hpa hpb, ha, hb⟩
end unique_factorization_domain
open unique_factorization_domain associated lattice associates
variables [integral_domain α] [nontrivial α] [gcd_monoid α] [unique_factorization_domain α]
local attribute [instance] associated.setoid
lemma exists_prime_dvd_of_gcd_ne_one {a b : α}
(h : gcd a b ≠ 1) (ha : a ≠ 0) : ∃ (p : α), prime p ∧ p ∣ a ∧ p ∣ b :=
begin
have hz : gcd a b ≠ 0, { apply mt (gcd_eq_zero_iff a b).mp, tauto },
have hg : associated (factors (gcd a b)).prod (gcd a b) := factors_prod hz,
have h : factors (gcd a b) ≠ 0,
{ contrapose! h with hz2,
rw [hz2, multiset.prod_zero] at hg,
rw [← normalize_gcd, ← normalize_one, ← out_mk, ← out_mk],
exact congr_arg _ (mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.mpr hg.symm) },
cases multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero h with p hp,
exact ⟨p,
prime_factors hz p hp,
(dvd_gcd_iff p a b).mp (dvd_trans (multiset.dvd_prod hp) (dvd_of_associated hg))⟩
end
theorem coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one {a b : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
gcd a b = 1 ↔ ∀ {d}, d ∣ a → d ∣ b → ¬ prime d :=
begin
split,
{ intro hg, intros p ha hb hp,
have hpg : p ∣ gcd a b := (dvd_gcd_iff p a b).mpr (and.intro ha hb),
rw hg at hpg,
exact hp.not_unit (is_unit_of_dvd_one p hpg) },
{ haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
contrapose!,
intro hg,
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpa, hpb⟩ := exists_prime_dvd_of_gcd_ne_one hg ha,
exact ⟨p, hpa, hpb, hp⟩ }
end
|
23e4d3f79562a312289c49a84ea802946aa6a289 | 9dd3f3912f7321eb58ee9aa8f21778ad6221f87c | /tests/lean/1292.lean | 07579d50277bf7b52832e897b7793e5f0ab9181e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bre7k30/lean | de893411bcfa7b3c5572e61b9e1c52951b310aa4 | 5a924699d076dab1bd5af23a8f910b433e598d7a | refs/heads/master | 1,610,900,145,817 | 1,488,006,845,000 | 1,488,006,845,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 110 | lean | def fn (n : nat) : nat :=
match n with
exit
theorem thm : true := begin end
example : has_add nat := sorry
|
3ced56bff5638976a60913f289cbc4fc63473ab3 | 54d7e71c3616d331b2ec3845d31deb08f3ff1dea | /library/init/data/char/default.lean | 2742cfad431b09719c1f5e30657d722a9f25ba70 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pachugupta/lean | 6f3305c4292288311cc4ab4550060b17d49ffb1d | 0d02136a09ac4cf27b5c88361750e38e1f485a1a | refs/heads/master | 1,611,110,653,606 | 1,493,130,117,000 | 1,493,167,649,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 222 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.data.char.basic init.data.char.lemmas
|
ce64fa25b61c0d760bbd9c7ac04447fb5efca972 | a4673261e60b025e2c8c825dfa4ab9108246c32e | /stage0/src/Lean/Exception.lean | e2eb5e33a8b5b205527aa34410f97798f8bf2488 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/lean4 | c02dec0cc32c4bccab009285475f265f17d73228 | 2909313475588cc20ac0436e55548a4502050d0a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,129,550,893 | 1,606,415,348,000 | 1,606,415,348,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,646 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Message
import Lean.InternalExceptionId
import Lean.Data.Options
import Lean.Util.MonadCache
namespace Lean
/- Exception type used in most Lean monads -/
inductive Exception :=
| error (ref : Syntax) (msg : MessageData)
| internal (id : InternalExceptionId) (extra : KVMap := {})
def Exception.toMessageData : Exception → MessageData
| Exception.error _ msg => msg
| Exception.internal id _ => id.toString
def Exception.getRef : Exception → Syntax
| Exception.error ref _ => ref
| Exception.internal _ _ => Syntax.missing
instance : Inhabited Exception := ⟨Exception.error arbitrary arbitrary⟩
/- Similar to `AddMessageContext`, but for error messages.
The default instance just uses `AddMessageContext`.
In error messages, we may want to provide additional information (e.g., macro expansion stack),
and refine the `(ref : Syntax)`. -/
class AddErrorMessageContext (m : Type → Type) :=
(add : Syntax → MessageData → m (Syntax × MessageData))
instance (m : Type → Type) [AddMessageContext m] [Monad m] : AddErrorMessageContext m := {
add := fun ref msg => do
let msg ← addMessageContext msg
pure (ref, msg)
}
section Methods
variables {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadExceptOf Exception m] [MonadRef m] [AddErrorMessageContext m]
def throwError (msg : MessageData) : m α := do
let ref ← getRef
let (ref, msg) ← AddErrorMessageContext.add ref msg
throw $ Exception.error ref msg
def throwUnknownConstant (constName : Name) : m α :=
throwError m!"unknown constant '{mkConst constName}'"
def throwErrorAt (ref : Syntax) (msg : MessageData) : m α := do
withRef ref <| throwError msg
def ofExcept [ToString ε] (x : Except ε α) : m α :=
match x with
| Except.ok a => pure a
| Except.error e => throwError $ toString e
def throwKernelException [MonadOptions m] (ex : KernelException) : m α := do
throwError <| ex.toMessageData (← getOptions)
end Methods
class MonadRecDepth (m : Type → Type) :=
(withRecDepth {α} : Nat → m α → m α)
(getRecDepth : m Nat)
(getMaxRecDepth : m Nat)
instance [Monad m] [MonadRecDepth m] : MonadRecDepth (ReaderT ρ m) := {
withRecDepth := fun d x ctx => MonadRecDepth.withRecDepth d (x ctx),
getRecDepth := fun _ => MonadRecDepth.getRecDepth,
getMaxRecDepth := fun _ => MonadRecDepth.getMaxRecDepth
}
instance [Monad m] [MonadRecDepth m] : MonadRecDepth (StateRefT' ω σ m) :=
inferInstanceAs (MonadRecDepth (ReaderT _ _))
instance [BEq α] [Hashable α] [Monad m] [STWorld ω m] [MonadRecDepth m] : MonadRecDepth (MonadCacheT α β m) :=
inferInstanceAs (MonadRecDepth (StateRefT' _ _ _))
@[inline] def withIncRecDepth [Monad m] [MonadRecDepth m] [MonadExceptOf Exception m] [MonadRef m] [AddErrorMessageContext m]
(x : m α) : m α := do
let curr ← MonadRecDepth.getRecDepth
let max ← MonadRecDepth.getMaxRecDepth
if curr == max then throwError maxRecDepthErrorMessage
MonadRecDepth.withRecDepth (curr+1) x
syntax "throwError! " (interpolatedStr(term) <|> term) : term
syntax "throwErrorAt! " term:max (interpolatedStr(term) <|> term) : term
macro_rules
| `(throwError! $msg) =>
if msg.getKind == interpolatedStrKind then
`(throwError (m! $msg))
else
`(throwError $msg)
macro_rules
| `(throwErrorAt! $ref $msg) =>
if msg.getKind == interpolatedStrKind then
`(throwErrorAt $ref (m! $msg))
else
`(throwErrorAt $ref $msg)
end Lean
|
7bab1a1c1230a4ae7ebcbdf5d8c9068df29cd424 | 3863d2564418bccb1859e057bf5a4ef240e75fd7 | /hott/homotopy/circle.hlean | e257d97be5eea5551b8a93ee72bb57242209f4af | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JacobGross/lean | 118bbb067ff4d4af48a266face2c7eb9868fa91c | eb26087df940c54337cb807b4bc6d345d1fc1085 | refs/heads/master | 1,582,735,011,532 | 1,462,557,826,000 | 1,462,557,826,000 | 46,451,196 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,462,557,826,000 | 1,447,885,161,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,950 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
Declaration of the circle
-/
import .sphere
import types.bool types.int.hott types.equiv
import algebra.homotopy_group algebra.hott .connectedness
open eq susp bool sphere_index is_equiv equiv is_trunc is_conn pi algebra
definition circle : Type₀ := sphere 1
namespace circle
notation `S¹` := circle
definition base1 : circle := !north
definition base2 : circle := !south
definition seg1 : base1 = base2 := merid !north
definition seg2 : base1 = base2 := merid !south
definition base : circle := base1
definition loop : base = base := seg2 ⬝ seg1⁻¹
definition rec2 {P : circle → Type} (Pb1 : P base1) (Pb2 : P base2)
(Ps1 : Pb1 =[seg1] Pb2) (Ps2 : Pb1 =[seg2] Pb2) (x : circle) : P x :=
begin
induction x with b,
{ exact Pb1},
{ exact Pb2},
{ esimp at *, induction b with y,
{ exact Ps1},
{ exact Ps2},
{ cases y}},
end
definition rec2_on [reducible] {P : circle → Type} (x : circle) (Pb1 : P base1) (Pb2 : P base2)
(Ps1 : Pb1 =[seg1] Pb2) (Ps2 : Pb1 =[seg2] Pb2) : P x :=
circle.rec2 Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2 x
theorem rec2_seg1 {P : circle → Type} (Pb1 : P base1) (Pb2 : P base2)
(Ps1 : Pb1 =[seg1] Pb2) (Ps2 : Pb1 =[seg2] Pb2)
: apd (rec2 Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2) seg1 = Ps1 :=
!rec_merid
theorem rec2_seg2 {P : circle → Type} (Pb1 : P base1) (Pb2 : P base2)
(Ps1 : Pb1 =[seg1] Pb2) (Ps2 : Pb1 =[seg2] Pb2)
: apd (rec2 Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2) seg2 = Ps2 :=
!rec_merid
definition elim2 {P : Type} (Pb1 Pb2 : P) (Ps1 Ps2 : Pb1 = Pb2) (x : circle) : P :=
rec2 Pb1 Pb2 (pathover_of_eq Ps1) (pathover_of_eq Ps2) x
definition elim2_on [reducible] {P : Type} (x : circle) (Pb1 Pb2 : P)
(Ps1 : Pb1 = Pb2) (Ps2 : Pb1 = Pb2) : P :=
elim2 Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2 x
theorem elim2_seg1 {P : Type} (Pb1 Pb2 : P) (Ps1 : Pb1 = Pb2) (Ps2 : Pb1 = Pb2)
: ap (elim2 Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2) seg1 = Ps1 :=
begin
apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn_inv !(pathover_constant seg1),
rewrite [▸*,-apd_eq_pathover_of_eq_ap,↑elim2,rec2_seg1],
end
theorem elim2_seg2 {P : Type} (Pb1 Pb2 : P) (Ps1 : Pb1 = Pb2) (Ps2 : Pb1 = Pb2)
: ap (elim2 Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2) seg2 = Ps2 :=
begin
apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn_inv !(pathover_constant seg2),
rewrite [▸*,-apd_eq_pathover_of_eq_ap,↑elim2,rec2_seg2],
end
definition elim2_type (Pb1 Pb2 : Type) (Ps1 Ps2 : Pb1 ≃ Pb2) (x : circle) : Type :=
elim2 Pb1 Pb2 (ua Ps1) (ua Ps2) x
definition elim2_type_on [reducible] (x : circle) (Pb1 Pb2 : Type) (Ps1 Ps2 : Pb1 ≃ Pb2)
: Type :=
elim2_type Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2 x
theorem elim2_type_seg1 (Pb1 Pb2 : Type) (Ps1 Ps2 : Pb1 ≃ Pb2)
: transport (elim2_type Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2) seg1 = Ps1 :=
by rewrite [tr_eq_cast_ap_fn,↑elim2_type,elim2_seg1];apply cast_ua_fn
theorem elim2_type_seg2 (Pb1 Pb2 : Type) (Ps1 Ps2 : Pb1 ≃ Pb2)
: transport (elim2_type Pb1 Pb2 Ps1 Ps2) seg2 = Ps2 :=
by rewrite [tr_eq_cast_ap_fn,↑elim2_type,elim2_seg2];apply cast_ua_fn
protected definition rec {P : circle → Type} (Pbase : P base) (Ploop : Pbase =[loop] Pbase)
(x : circle) : P x :=
begin
fapply (rec2_on x),
{ exact Pbase},
{ exact (transport P seg1 Pbase)},
{ apply pathover_tr},
{ apply pathover_tr_of_pathover, exact Ploop}
end
protected definition rec_on [reducible] {P : circle → Type} (x : circle) (Pbase : P base)
(Ploop : Pbase =[loop] Pbase) : P x :=
circle.rec Pbase Ploop x
theorem rec_loop_helper {A : Type} (P : A → Type)
{x y z : A} {p : x = y} {p' : z = y} {u : P x} {v : P z} (q : u =[p ⬝ p'⁻¹] v) :
pathover_tr_of_pathover q ⬝o !pathover_tr⁻¹ᵒ = q :=
by cases p'; cases q; exact idp
definition con_refl {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p ⬝ refl _ = p :=
eq.rec_on p idp
theorem rec_loop {P : circle → Type} (Pbase : P base) (Ploop : Pbase =[loop] Pbase) :
apd (circle.rec Pbase Ploop) loop = Ploop :=
begin
rewrite [↑loop,apd_con,↑circle.rec,↑circle.rec2_on,↑base,rec2_seg2,apd_inv,rec2_seg1],
apply rec_loop_helper
end
protected definition elim {P : Type} (Pbase : P) (Ploop : Pbase = Pbase)
(x : circle) : P :=
circle.rec Pbase (pathover_of_eq Ploop) x
protected definition elim_on [reducible] {P : Type} (x : circle) (Pbase : P)
(Ploop : Pbase = Pbase) : P :=
circle.elim Pbase Ploop x
theorem elim_loop {P : Type} (Pbase : P) (Ploop : Pbase = Pbase) :
ap (circle.elim Pbase Ploop) loop = Ploop :=
begin
apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn_inv !(pathover_constant loop),
rewrite [▸*,-apd_eq_pathover_of_eq_ap,↑circle.elim,rec_loop],
end
theorem elim_seg1 {P : Type} (Pbase : P) (Ploop : Pbase = Pbase)
: ap (circle.elim Pbase Ploop) seg1 = (tr_constant seg1 Pbase)⁻¹ :=
begin
apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn_inv !(pathover_constant seg1),
rewrite [▸*,-apd_eq_pathover_of_eq_ap,↑circle.elim,↑circle.rec],
rewrite [↑circle.rec2_on,rec2_seg1], apply inverse,
apply pathover_of_eq_tr_constant_inv
end
theorem elim_seg2 {P : Type} (Pbase : P) (Ploop : Pbase = Pbase)
: ap (circle.elim Pbase Ploop) seg2 = Ploop ⬝ (tr_constant seg1 Pbase)⁻¹ :=
begin
apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn_inv !(pathover_constant seg2),
rewrite [▸*,-apd_eq_pathover_of_eq_ap,↑circle.elim,↑circle.rec],
rewrite [↑circle.rec2_on,rec2_seg2],
assert l : Π(A B : Type)(a a₂ a₂' : A)(b b' : B)(p : a = a₂)(p' : a₂' = a₂)
(q : b = b'),
pathover_tr_of_pathover (pathover_of_eq q)
= pathover_of_eq (q ⬝ (tr_constant p' b')⁻¹)
:> b =[p] p' ▸ b',
{ intros, cases q, cases p', cases p, reflexivity },
apply l
end
protected definition elim_type (Pbase : Type) (Ploop : Pbase ≃ Pbase)
(x : circle) : Type :=
circle.elim Pbase (ua Ploop) x
protected definition elim_type_on [reducible] (x : circle) (Pbase : Type)
(Ploop : Pbase ≃ Pbase) : Type :=
circle.elim_type Pbase Ploop x
theorem elim_type_loop (Pbase : Type) (Ploop : Pbase ≃ Pbase) :
transport (circle.elim_type Pbase Ploop) loop = Ploop :=
by rewrite [tr_eq_cast_ap_fn,↑circle.elim_type,elim_loop];apply cast_ua_fn
theorem elim_type_loop_inv (Pbase : Type) (Ploop : Pbase ≃ Pbase) :
transport (circle.elim_type Pbase Ploop) loop⁻¹ = to_inv Ploop :=
by rewrite [tr_inv_fn]; apply inv_eq_inv; apply elim_type_loop
end circle
attribute circle.base1 circle.base2 circle.base [constructor]
attribute circle.rec2 circle.elim2 [unfold 6] [recursor 6]
attribute circle.elim2_type [unfold 5]
attribute circle.rec2_on circle.elim2_on [unfold 2]
attribute circle.elim2_type [unfold 1]
attribute circle.rec circle.elim [unfold 4] [recursor 4]
attribute circle.elim_type [unfold 3]
attribute circle.rec_on circle.elim_on [unfold 2]
attribute circle.elim_type_on [unfold 1]
namespace circle
open sigma
/- universal property of the circle -/
definition circle_pi_equiv [constructor] (P : S¹ → Type)
: (Π(x : S¹), P x) ≃ Σ(p : P base), p =[loop] p :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro f, exact ⟨f base, apd f loop⟩},
{ intro v x, induction v with p q, induction x,
{ exact p},
{ exact q}},
{ intro v, induction v with p q, fapply sigma_eq,
{ reflexivity},
{ esimp, apply pathover_idp_of_eq, apply rec_loop}},
{ intro f, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x, induction x,
{ reflexivity},
{ apply eq_pathover_dep, apply hdeg_squareover, esimp, apply rec_loop}}
end
definition circle_arrow_equiv [constructor] (P : Type)
: (S¹ → P) ≃ Σ(p : P), p = p :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro f, exact ⟨f base, ap f loop⟩},
{ intro v x, induction v with p q, induction x,
{ exact p},
{ exact q}},
{ intro v, induction v with p q, fapply sigma_eq,
{ reflexivity},
{ esimp, apply pathover_idp_of_eq, apply elim_loop}},
{ intro f, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x, induction x,
{ reflexivity},
{ apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square, esimp, apply elim_loop}}
end
definition pointed_circle [instance] [constructor] : pointed S¹ :=
pointed.mk base
definition pcircle [constructor] : Type* := pointed.mk' S¹
notation `S¹.` := pcircle
definition loop_neq_idp : loop ≠ idp :=
assume H : loop = idp,
have H2 : Π{A : Type₁} {a : A} {p : a = a}, p = idp,
from λA a p, calc
p = ap (circle.elim a p) loop : elim_loop
... = ap (circle.elim a p) (refl base) : by rewrite H,
eq_bnot_ne_idp H2
definition nonidp (x : circle) : x = x :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact loop},
{ apply concato_eq, apply pathover_eq_lr, rewrite [con.left_inv,idp_con]}
end
definition nonidp_neq_idp : nonidp ≠ (λx, idp) :=
assume H : nonidp = λx, idp,
have H2 : loop = idp, from apd10 H base,
absurd H2 loop_neq_idp
open int
protected definition code [unfold 1] (x : circle) : Type₀ :=
circle.elim_type_on x ℤ equiv_succ
definition transport_code_loop (a : ℤ) : transport circle.code loop a = succ a :=
ap10 !elim_type_loop a
definition transport_code_loop_inv (a : ℤ) : transport circle.code loop⁻¹ a = pred a :=
ap10 !elim_type_loop_inv a
protected definition encode [unfold 2] {x : circle} (p : base = x) : circle.code x :=
transport circle.code p (of_num 0)
protected definition decode [unfold 1] {x : circle} : circle.code x → base = x :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact power loop},
{ apply arrow_pathover_left, intro b, apply concato_eq, apply pathover_eq_r,
rewrite [power_con,transport_code_loop]}
end
definition circle_eq_equiv [constructor] (x : circle) : (base = x) ≃ circle.code x :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact circle.encode},
{ exact circle.decode},
{ exact abstract [irreducible] begin
induction x,
{ intro a, esimp, apply rec_nat_on a,
{ exact idp},
{ intros n p, rewrite [↑circle.encode, -power_con, con_tr, transport_code_loop],
exact ap succ p},
{ intros n p, rewrite [↑circle.encode, nat_succ_eq_int_succ, neg_succ, -power_con_inv,
@con_tr _ circle.code, transport_code_loop_inv, ↑[circle.encode] at p, p, -neg_succ] }},
{ apply pathover_of_tr_eq, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, apply @is_set.elim,
esimp, exact _} end end},
{ intro p, cases p, exact idp},
end
definition base_eq_base_equiv [constructor] : base = base ≃ ℤ :=
circle_eq_equiv base
definition decode_add (a b : ℤ) : circle.decode a ⬝ circle.decode b = circle.decode (a +[ℤ] b) :=
!power_con_power
definition encode_con (p q : base = base)
: circle.encode (p ⬝ q) = circle.encode p +[ℤ] circle.encode q :=
preserve_binary_of_inv_preserve base_eq_base_equiv concat (@add ℤ _) decode_add p q
--the carrier of π₁(S¹) is the set-truncation of base = base.
open algebra trunc
definition fg_carrier_equiv_int : π[1](S¹.) ≃ ℤ :=
trunc_equiv_trunc 0 base_eq_base_equiv ⬝e @(trunc_equiv 0 ℤ) proof _ qed
definition con_comm_base (p q : base = base) : p ⬝ q = q ⬝ p :=
eq_of_fn_eq_fn base_eq_base_equiv (by esimp;rewrite [+encode_con,add.comm])
definition fundamental_group_of_circle : π₁(S¹.) = gℤ :=
begin
apply (Group_eq fg_carrier_equiv_int),
intros g h,
induction g with g', induction h with h',
apply encode_con,
end
open nat
definition homotopy_group_of_circle (n : ℕ) : πg[n+1 +1] S¹. = G0 :=
begin
refine @trivial_homotopy_add_of_is_set_loop_space S¹. 1 n _,
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev, apply base_eq_base_equiv
end
definition eq_equiv_Z (x : S¹) : x = x ≃ ℤ :=
begin
induction x,
{ apply base_eq_base_equiv},
{ apply equiv_pathover, intro p p' q, apply pathover_of_eq,
note H := eq_of_square (square_of_pathover q),
rewrite con_comm_base at H,
note H' := cancel_left _ H,
induction H', reflexivity}
end
proposition is_trunc_circle [instance] : is_trunc 1 S¹ :=
begin
apply is_trunc_succ_of_is_trunc_loop,
{ apply trunc_index.minus_one_le_succ},
{ intro x, apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev, apply eq_equiv_Z}
end
proposition is_conn_circle [instance] : is_conn 0 circle :=
sphere.is_conn_sphere -1.+2
definition circle_turn [reducible] (x : S¹) : x = x :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact loop },
{ apply eq_pathover, apply square_of_eq, rewrite ap_id }
end
definition circle_mul [reducible] (x y : S¹) : S¹ :=
circle.elim y (circle_turn y) x
definition circle_mul_base (x : S¹) : circle_mul x base = x :=
begin
induction x,
{ reflexivity },
{ apply eq_pathover, krewrite [elim_loop,ap_id], apply hrefl }
end
definition circle_base_mul [reducible] (x : S¹)
: circle_mul base x = x :=
idp
end circle
|
58cdb88a5bc6acebf1be2a37a61c9c62e5931285 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/474_lean3.lean | faca80b6c0f36b05f0be8d663aaaa53bb55e2d26 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 375 | lean | def my_eq {A : Type _} (a b : A) : Prop := true
theorem id_map_is_right_neutral₁ {A : Type} (map : A -> A) :
my_eq (Function.comp.{1, 1, _} map map) map :=
sorry
theorem id_map_is_right_neutral₂ {A : Type} (map : A -> A) :
my_eq (Function.comp map map) map :=
sorry
theorem id_map_is_right_neutral₃ {A : Type} (map : A -> A) :
my_eq (map ∘ map) map :=
sorry
|
9922349f5e41c0a1b62cffb3b56b5c67f20752ce | efce24474b28579aba3272fdb77177dc2b11d7aa | /src/homotopy_theory/formal/i_category/homotopy_lemmas.lean | 907ae855601ccad538ef97b6380c7eaf5f27d711 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rwbarton/lean-homotopy-theory | cff499f24268d60e1c546e7c86c33f58c62888ed | 39e1b4ea1ed1b0eca2f68bc64162dde6a6396dee | refs/heads/lean-3.4.2 | 1,622,711,883,224 | 1,598,550,958,000 | 1,598,550,958,000 | 136,023,667 | 12 | 6 | Apache-2.0 | 1,573,187,573,000 | 1,528,116,262,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,386 | lean | import homotopy_theory.formal.cylinder.homotopy
import .definitions
import .lemmas
universes v u
open category_theory
open category_theory.category
local notation f ` ∘ `:80 g:80 := g ≫ f
namespace homotopy_theory.cofibrations
open homotopy_theory.cylinder
namespace equiv_private
section
open category_theory.has_initial_object category_theory.preserves_initial_object
open category_theory.preserves_coproducts
open precofibration_category I_category
/-
Goal: If j : a → b is a cofibration, then homotopy rel j is an
equivalence relation. More generally, we will prove the
following. Suppose that G : Ia → x is a homotopy. In the diagram
f₀ - f₁
|
f₀' - f₁'
suppose that f₀ ≃ f₀' rel j and that f₀ ≃ f₁ and f₀' ≃ f₁' via
homotopies that each restrict to G on a. Then f₁ ≃ f₁' rel j. By
taking G to be a constant homotopy, we conclude in particular that
homotopy rel j is an equivalence relation.
-/
parameters {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [has_initial_object.{v} C]
[has_coproducts.{v} C] [I_category.{v} C]
parameters {a b : C} (j : a ⟶ b) (hj : is_cof j)
parameters {x : C} {f₀ f₀' f₁ f₁' : b ⟶ x}
parameters {G : I.obj a ⟶ x}
parameters {H₀ : homotopy f₀ f₀'} (h₀ : H₀.is_rel j)
-- Furthermore, we generalize over the direction of the homotopies
-- between f₀ and f₁ and between f₀' and f₁'.
parameters (ε : endpoint)
parameters {H : homotopy_dir ε f₀ f₁} (h : H.H ∘ I &> j = G)
parameters {H' : homotopy_dir ε f₀' f₁'} (h' : H'.H ∘ I &> j = G)
-- Goal: construct a homotopy from f₁ to f₂ rel j.
/-
a ⊔ a → Ia
↓ ↓
b ⊔ b → b_Ia_b
-/
def Po : pushout (∂I &> j) (ii @> a) := pushout_by_cof _ _ (cof_coprod hj hj)
def b_Ia_b := Po.ob
-- I preserves the above pushout.
def Ipo : Is_pushout (I &> (∂I &> j)) (I &> (ii @> a)) (I &> Po.map₀) (I &> Po.map₁) :=
I_preserves_pushout_by_cof (cof_coprod hj hj) Po.is_pushout
-- Moreover, I(a ⊔ a) = Ia ⊔ Ia and I(b ⊔ b) = Ib ⊔ Ib.
def Ia_Ia : Is_coproduct (I &> (i₀ : a ⟶ a ⊔ a)) (I &> (i₁ : a ⟶ a ⊔ a)) :=
I_of_coprod_is_coproduct
def Ib_Ib : Is_coproduct (I &> (i₀ : b ⟶ b ⊔ b)) (I &> (i₁ : b ⟶ b ⊔ b)) :=
I_of_coprod_is_coproduct
-- Thus, we can "glue" the homotopies H and H' to form a map I(b ⊔ b) → X.
def HH' : I.obj (b ⊔ b) ⟶ x :=
Ib_Ib.induced H.H H'.H
-- Because the homotopies agree on a, the restriction of this map to I(a ⊔ a)
-- extends to a map I(Ia) → X. Then we get an induced map on I(b ⊔ₐ Ia ⊔ₐ b).
def GIp : I.obj (I.obj a) ⟶ x := G ∘ I &> (p @> a)
include h h'
def HH'' : I.obj b_Ia_b ⟶ x :=
Ipo.induced HH' GIp $
-- This is a bit awful
begin
apply Ia_Ia.uniqueness;
rw [←assoc, ←assoc, ←I.map_comp, ←I.map_comp];
change
_ ∘ I &> (coprod_of_maps j j ∘ _) =
_ ∘ I &> (coprod.induced (i 0 @> a) (i 1 @> a) ∘ _);
simp [HH', GIp]; rw h <|> rw h';
rw [←assoc, ←I.map_comp]; simp
end
omit h h'
-- The map guaranteed to be a cofibration by the relative cylinder axiom.
-- Induced map in same pushout square as above.
def j' := Po.is_pushout.induced (ii @> b) (I &> j) (ii.naturality _)
include h₀
lemma HH''iε : H₀.H ∘ j' = HH'' ∘ i ε @> _ :=
have t : ∀ {z} (k : z ⟶ _), H₀.H ∘ j' ∘ k = H₀.H ∘ (j' ∘ k), by simp,
begin
unfold HH'' HH',
apply Po.is_pushout.uniqueness,
-- This is truly awful
{ rw i_nat_assoc,
apply coprod.uniqueness;
{ simp, erw i_nat_assoc, simp,
rw t, unfold j' ii, simp, rw ←assoc, simp,
erw H₀.Hi₀ <|> erw H₀.Hi₁,
erw H.Hiε <|> erw H'.Hiε } },
{ rw [i_nat_assoc, t], unfold j' GIp, simp,
erw [←i_nat_assoc, ←h, ←i_nat_assoc, H.Hiε],
exact h₀ }
end
omit h₀
-- Now we can apply the homotopy extension property of j'
lemma Ex_E : ∃ (E : I.obj (I.obj b) ⟶ x),
E ∘ i ε @> (I.obj b) = H₀.H ∧ E ∘ I &> j' = HH'' :=
hep_cof j' (relative_cylinder j hj) ε _ _ _ HH''iε
section E
parameters (E : I.obj (I.obj b) ⟶ x)
(hE : E ∘ i ε @> I.obj b = H₀.H ∧ E ∘ I &> j' = HH'')
-- Now E ∘ i ε.v is supposed to be a homotopy from f₁ to f₁' rel j.
include hE
lemma Eiεvi_ :
E ∘ i ε.v @> I.obj b ∘ i 0 @> b = f₁ ∧
E ∘ i ε.v @> I.obj b ∘ i 1 @> b = f₁' :=
have
i.{v} ε.v @> I.obj b ∘ i 0 @> b = I &> j' ∘ I &> Po.map₀ ∘ i ε.v @> _ ∘ i₀ ∧
i.{v} ε.v @> I.obj b ∘ i 1 @> b = I &> j' ∘ I &> Po.map₀ ∘ i ε.v @> _ ∘ i₁, begin
split;
{ rw ←I.map_comp, unfold j', simp, erw i_nat_assoc,
rw ←I.map_comp, dsimp [ii], simp,
apply (i _).naturality }
end,
begin
split;
{ rw ←assoc, rw this.1 <|> rw this.2,
simp [hE.2, HH'', HH'],
erw i_nat_assoc, dsimp, simp,
-- dsimp: coprod vs (has_coproducts.coproduct _ _).ob?
exact H.Hiεv <|> exact H'.Hiεv }
end
def Eiε : homotopy f₁ f₁' :=
{ H := E ∘ i ε.v @> I.obj b, Hi₀ := Eiεvi_.1, Hi₁ := Eiεvi_.2 }
lemma Eiε_is_rel : Eiε.is_rel j :=
have i ε.v @> I.obj b ∘ I &> j = I &> j' ∘ I &> Po.map₁ ∘ i ε.v @> I.obj a, begin
rw ←I.map_comp, unfold j', simp,
rw ←(i ε.v).naturality, refl
end,
begin
dsimp [homotopy.is_rel, Eiε] { iota := tt },
rw [←assoc, this], simp [hE.2, HH'', GIp],
rw [←h, ←i_nat_assoc, ←i_nat_assoc, H.Hiεv]
end
end E
lemma f₁_f₂ : f₁ ≃ f₁' rel j :=
let ⟨E, hE⟩ := Ex_E in ⟨Eiε E hE, Eiε_is_rel E hE⟩
end
end equiv_private
end homotopy_theory.cofibrations
-- TODO: Is this a sensible place to put these?
namespace homotopy_theory.cylinder
open homotopy_theory.cofibrations
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
[has_initial_object.{v} C] [has_coproducts.{v} C] [I_category.{v} C]
variables {a b : C} {j : a ⟶ b} (hj : is_cof j)
lemma homotopic_rel.symm_trans {x : C} {f₀ f₁ f₂ : b ⟶ x} :
f₀ ≃ f₁ rel j → f₀ ≃ f₂ rel j → f₁ ≃ f₂ rel j :=
assume ⟨H₁, h₁⟩ ⟨H₂, h₂⟩, equiv_private.f₁_f₂ j hj homotopy.refl_is_rel 0 h₁ h₂
lemma homotopic_rel.symm {x : C} {f₀ f₁ : b ⟶ x} (h : f₀ ≃ f₁ rel j) : f₁ ≃ f₀ rel j :=
homotopic_rel.symm_trans hj h (homotopic_rel.refl _)
lemma homotopic_rel.trans {x : C} {f₀ f₁ f₂ : b ⟶ x}
(h₁ : f₀ ≃ f₁ rel j) (h₂ : f₁ ≃ f₂ rel j) : f₀ ≃ f₂ rel j :=
homotopic_rel.symm_trans hj (h₁.symm hj) h₂
lemma homotopic_rel_is_equivalence {x : C} :
equivalence (homotopic_rel j : (b ⟶ x) → (b ⟶ x) → Prop) :=
⟨homotopic_rel.refl,
λ f₀ f₁, homotopic_rel.symm hj,
λ f₀ f₁ f₂, homotopic_rel.trans hj⟩
@[symm] lemma homotopic.symm {x : C} {f₀ f₁ : b ⟶ x} (h : f₀ ≃ f₁) : f₁ ≃ f₀ :=
begin
rw ←(homotopic_rel_initial Ii_initial (! b)) at ⊢ h,
exact homotopic_rel.symm (all_objects_cofibrant.cofibrant.{v} b) h,
end
@[trans] lemma homotopic.trans {x : C} {f₀ f₁ f₂ : b ⟶ x} (h₁ : f₀ ≃ f₁) (h₂ : f₁ ≃ f₂) : f₀ ≃ f₂ :=
begin
rw ←(homotopic_rel_initial Ii_initial (! b)) at ⊢ h₁ h₂,
exact homotopic_rel.trans (all_objects_cofibrant.cofibrant.{v} b) h₁ h₂,
end
lemma homotopic_is_equivalence {x : C} :
equivalence (homotopic : (b ⟶ x) → (b ⟶ x) → Prop) :=
⟨homotopic.refl, λ f₀ f₁, homotopic.symm, λ f₀ f₁ f₂, homotopic.trans⟩
end homotopy_theory.cylinder
|
b109a2cb009c1581df25a3145eb0082b7db76d0f | 968e2f50b755d3048175f176376eff7139e9df70 | /examples/prop_logic_theory/unnamed_400.lean | f23820d96f18ea8c144cf8cd27c3794ad965a855 | [] | no_license | gihanmarasingha/mth1001_sphinx | 190a003269ba5e54717b448302a27ca26e31d491 | 05126586cbf5786e521be1ea2ef5b4ba3c44e74a | refs/heads/master | 1,672,913,933,677 | 1,604,516,583,000 | 1,604,516,583,000 | 309,245,750 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 695 | lean | variables p q r : Prop
-- BEGIN
example (h : (p ∧ q) ∧ r) : p ∧ (q ∧ r) :=
begin
cases h with h₂ h₃, -- We have `h₂ : p ∧ q` and `h₃ : r` by left and right conjunction elimination on `h`.
split, -- By conjunction introduction, it suffices to prove `p` and `q ∧ r`.
{ show p, from h₂.left, }, -- We show `p` by left and elimination on `h₂`.
{ show q ∧ r, split, -- We show `q ∧ r`. By conjunction introduction, it suffices to prove `q` and `r`.
{ show q, from h₂.right, }, -- We show `q` by right and elimination on `h₂`.
{ show r, from h₃ }, } , -- We show `r` by reiteration on `h₃`.
end
-- END |
b01932fab11a7ae5492eb5dcac33e87a274953c0 | abd85493667895c57a7507870867b28124b3998f | /src/topology/basic.lean | ba515b79e6ea56ac2cc12682447770afae448e05 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pechersky/mathlib | d56eef16bddb0bfc8bc552b05b7270aff5944393 | f1df14c2214ee114c9738e733efd5de174deb95d | refs/heads/master | 1,666,714,392,571 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 270,557,274 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,591,597,975,000 | 1,591,597,974,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,514 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import order.filter
import order.filter.bases
/-!
# Basic theory of topological spaces.
The main definition is the type class `topological space α` which endows a type `α` with a topology.
Then `set α` gets predicates `is_open`, `is_closed` and functions `interior`, `closure` and
`frontier`. Each point `x` of `α` gets a neighborhood filter `𝓝 x`.
This file also defines locally finite families of subsets of `α`.
For topological spaces `α` and `β`, a function `f : α → β` and a point `a : α`,
`continuous_at f a` means `f` is continuous at `a`, and global continuity is
`continuous f`. There is also a version of continuity `pcontinuous` for
partially defined functions.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space, interior, closure, frontier, neighborhood, continuity, continuous function
-/
open set filter classical
open_locale classical
universes u v w
/-- A topology on `α`. -/
@[protect_proj] structure topological_space (α : Type u) :=
(is_open : set α → Prop)
(is_open_univ : is_open univ)
(is_open_inter : ∀s t, is_open s → is_open t → is_open (s ∩ t))
(is_open_sUnion : ∀s, (∀t∈s, is_open t) → is_open (⋃₀ s))
attribute [class] topological_space
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def topological_space.of_closed {α : Type u} (T : set (set α))
(empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T) (sInter_mem : ∀ A ⊆ T, ⋂₀ A ∈ T) (union_mem : ∀ A B ∈ T, A ∪ B ∈ T) :
topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λ X, -X ∈ T,
is_open_univ := by simp [empty_mem],
is_open_inter := λ s t hs ht, by simpa [set.compl_inter] using union_mem (-s) (-t) hs ht,
is_open_sUnion := λ s hs,
by rw set.compl_sUnion; exact sInter_mem (set.compl '' s)
(λ z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩, by simpa [hz.symm] using hs y hy) }
section topological_space
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {a : α} {s s₁ s₂ : set α} {p p₁ p₂ : α → Prop}
@[ext]
lemma topological_space_eq : ∀ {f g : topological_space α}, f.is_open = g.is_open → f = g
| ⟨a, _, _, _⟩ ⟨b, _, _, _⟩ rfl := rfl
section
variables [t : topological_space α]
include t
/-- `is_open s` means that `s` is open in the ambient topological space on `α` -/
def is_open (s : set α) : Prop := topological_space.is_open t s
@[simp]
lemma is_open_univ : is_open (univ : set α) := topological_space.is_open_univ t
lemma is_open_inter (h₁ : is_open s₁) (h₂ : is_open s₂) : is_open (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
topological_space.is_open_inter t s₁ s₂ h₁ h₂
lemma is_open_sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : ∀t ∈ s, is_open t) : is_open (⋃₀ s) :=
topological_space.is_open_sUnion t s h
end
lemma is_open_fold {s : set α} {t : topological_space α} : t.is_open s = @is_open α t s :=
rfl
variables [topological_space α]
lemma is_open_Union {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, is_open (f i)) : is_open (⋃i, f i) :=
is_open_sUnion $ by rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩; exact h i
lemma is_open_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (h : ∀i∈s, is_open (f i)) :
is_open (⋃i∈s, f i) :=
is_open_Union $ assume i, is_open_Union $ assume hi, h i hi
lemma is_open_union (h₁ : is_open s₁) (h₂ : is_open s₂) : is_open (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
by rw union_eq_Union; exact is_open_Union (bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
@[simp] lemma is_open_empty : is_open (∅ : set α) :=
by rw ← sUnion_empty; exact is_open_sUnion (assume a, false.elim)
lemma is_open_sInter {s : set (set α)} (hs : finite s) : (∀t ∈ s, is_open t) → is_open (⋂₀ s) :=
finite.induction_on hs (λ _, by rw sInter_empty; exact is_open_univ) $
λ a s has hs ih h, by rw sInter_insert; exact
is_open_inter (h _ $ mem_insert _ _) (ih $ λ t, h t ∘ mem_insert_of_mem _)
lemma is_open_bInter {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s) :
(∀i∈s, is_open (f i)) → is_open (⋂i∈s, f i) :=
finite.induction_on hs
(λ _, by rw bInter_empty; exact is_open_univ)
(λ a s has hs ih h, by rw bInter_insert; exact
is_open_inter (h a (mem_insert _ _)) (ih (λ i hi, h i (mem_insert_of_mem _ hi))))
lemma is_open_Inter [fintype β] {s : β → set α}
(h : ∀ i, is_open (s i)) : is_open (⋂ i, s i) :=
suffices is_open (⋂ (i : β) (hi : i ∈ @univ β), s i), by simpa,
is_open_bInter finite_univ (λ i _, h i)
lemma is_open_Inter_prop {p : Prop} {s : p → set α}
(h : ∀ h : p, is_open (s h)) : is_open (Inter s) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
lemma is_open_const {p : Prop} : is_open {a : α | p} :=
by_cases
(assume : p, begin simp only [this]; exact is_open_univ end)
(assume : ¬ p, begin simp only [this]; exact is_open_empty end)
lemma is_open_and : is_open {a | p₁ a} → is_open {a | p₂ a} → is_open {a | p₁ a ∧ p₂ a} :=
is_open_inter
/-- A set is closed if its complement is open -/
def is_closed (s : set α) : Prop := is_open (-s)
@[simp] lemma is_closed_empty : is_closed (∅ : set α) :=
by unfold is_closed; rw compl_empty; exact is_open_univ
@[simp] lemma is_closed_univ : is_closed (univ : set α) :=
by unfold is_closed; rw compl_univ; exact is_open_empty
lemma is_closed_union : is_closed s₁ → is_closed s₂ → is_closed (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
λ h₁ h₂, by unfold is_closed; rw compl_union; exact is_open_inter h₁ h₂
lemma is_closed_sInter {s : set (set α)} : (∀t ∈ s, is_closed t) → is_closed (⋂₀ s) :=
by simp only [is_closed, compl_sInter, sUnion_image]; exact assume h, is_open_Union $ assume t, is_open_Union $ assume ht, h t ht
lemma is_closed_Inter {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, is_closed (f i)) : is_closed (⋂i, f i ) :=
is_closed_sInter $ assume t ⟨i, (heq : f i = t)⟩, heq ▸ h i
@[simp] lemma is_open_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_open (-s) ↔ is_closed s := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma is_closed_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_closed (-s) ↔ is_open s :=
by rw [←is_open_compl_iff, compl_compl]
lemma is_open_diff {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_open s) (h₂ : is_closed t) : is_open (s \ t) :=
is_open_inter h₁ $ is_open_compl_iff.mpr h₂
lemma is_closed_inter (h₁ : is_closed s₁) (h₂ : is_closed s₂) : is_closed (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by rw [is_closed, compl_inter]; exact is_open_union h₁ h₂
lemma is_closed_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s) :
(∀i∈s, is_closed (f i)) → is_closed (⋃i∈s, f i) :=
finite.induction_on hs
(λ _, by rw bUnion_empty; exact is_closed_empty)
(λ a s has hs ih h, by rw bUnion_insert; exact
is_closed_union (h a (mem_insert _ _)) (ih (λ i hi, h i (mem_insert_of_mem _ hi))))
lemma is_closed_Union [fintype β] {s : β → set α}
(h : ∀ i, is_closed (s i)) : is_closed (Union s) :=
suffices is_closed (⋃ (i : β) (hi : i ∈ @univ β), s i),
by convert this; simp [set.ext_iff],
is_closed_bUnion finite_univ (λ i _, h i)
lemma is_closed_Union_prop {p : Prop} {s : p → set α}
(h : ∀ h : p, is_closed (s h)) : is_closed (Union s) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
lemma is_closed_imp {p q : α → Prop} (hp : is_open {x | p x})
(hq : is_closed {x | q x}) : is_closed {x | p x → q x} :=
have {x | p x → q x} = (- {x | p x}) ∪ {x | q x}, from set.ext $ λ x, imp_iff_not_or,
by rw [this]; exact is_closed_union (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr hp) hq
lemma is_open_neg : is_closed {a | p a} → is_open {a | ¬ p a} :=
is_open_compl_iff.mpr
/-- The interior of a set `s` is the largest open subset of `s`. -/
def interior (s : set α) : set α := ⋃₀ {t | is_open t ∧ t ⊆ s}
lemma mem_interior {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t :=
by simp only [interior, mem_set_of_eq, exists_prop, and_assoc, and.left_comm]
@[simp] lemma is_open_interior {s : set α} : is_open (interior s) :=
is_open_sUnion $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁
lemma interior_subset {s : set α} : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂
lemma interior_maximal {s t : set α} (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : is_open t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
lemma interior_eq_of_open {s : set α} (h : is_open s) : interior s = s :=
subset.antisymm interior_subset (interior_maximal (subset.refl s) h)
lemma interior_eq_iff_open {s : set α} : interior s = s ↔ is_open s :=
⟨assume h, h ▸ is_open_interior, interior_eq_of_open⟩
lemma subset_interior_iff_open {s : set α} : s ⊆ interior s ↔ is_open s :=
by simp only [interior_eq_iff_open.symm, subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
lemma subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_open s) :
s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h, subset.trans h interior_subset, assume h₂, interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
lemma interior_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (subset.trans interior_subset h) is_open_interior
@[simp] lemma interior_empty : interior (∅ : set α) = ∅ :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_empty
@[simp] lemma interior_univ : interior (univ : set α) = univ :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_univ
@[simp] lemma interior_interior {s : set α} : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_interior
@[simp] lemma interior_inter {s t : set α} : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
subset.antisymm
(subset_inter (interior_mono $ inter_subset_left s t) (interior_mono $ inter_subset_right s t))
(interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) $ is_open_inter is_open_interior is_open_interior)
lemma interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed s) (h₂ : interior t = ∅) :
interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s, from
assume x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : is_open u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩,
classical.by_contradiction $ assume hx₂ : x ∉ s,
have u \ s ⊆ t,
from assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂,
have u \ s ⊆ interior t,
by rwa subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open (is_open_diff hu₁ h₁),
have u \ s ⊆ ∅,
by rwa h₂ at this,
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩,
subset.antisymm
(interior_maximal this is_open_interior)
(interior_mono $ subset_union_left _ _)
lemma is_open_iff_forall_mem_open : is_open s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t :=
by rw ← subset_interior_iff_open; simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
/-- The closure of `s` is the smallest closed set containing `s`. -/
def closure (s : set α) : set α := ⋂₀ {t | is_closed t ∧ s ⊆ t}
@[simp] lemma is_closed_closure {s : set α} : is_closed (closure s) :=
is_closed_sInter $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁
lemma subset_closure {s : set α} : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂
lemma closure_minimal {s t : set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : is_closed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
lemma closure_eq_of_is_closed {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) : closure s = s :=
subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
lemma closure_eq_iff_is_closed {s : set α} : closure s = s ↔ is_closed s :=
⟨assume h, h ▸ is_closed_closure, closure_eq_of_is_closed⟩
lemma closure_subset_iff_subset_of_is_closed {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed t) :
closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨subset.trans subset_closure, assume h, closure_minimal h h₁⟩
lemma closure_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (subset.trans h subset_closure) is_closed_closure
lemma monotone_closure (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : monotone (@closure α _) :=
λ _ _, closure_mono
lemma closure_inter_subset_inter_closure (s t : set α) :
closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ closure s ∩ closure t :=
(monotone_closure α).map_inf_le s t
lemma is_closed_of_closure_subset {s : set α} (h : closure s ⊆ s) : is_closed s :=
by rw subset.antisymm subset_closure h; exact is_closed_closure
@[simp] lemma closure_empty : closure (∅ : set α) = ∅ :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_empty
lemma closure_empty_iff (s : set α) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨subset_eq_empty subset_closure, λ h, h.symm ▸ closure_empty⟩
lemma set.nonempty.closure {s : set α} (h : s.nonempty) :
set.nonempty (closure s) :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h in ⟨x, subset_closure hx⟩
@[simp] lemma closure_univ : closure (univ : set α) = univ :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_univ
@[simp] lemma closure_closure {s : set α} : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_closure
@[simp] lemma closure_union {s t : set α} : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t :=
subset.antisymm
(closure_minimal (union_subset_union subset_closure subset_closure) $ is_closed_union is_closed_closure is_closed_closure)
((monotone_closure α).le_map_sup s t)
lemma interior_subset_closure {s : set α} : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
lemma closure_eq_compl_interior_compl {s : set α} : closure s = - interior (- s) :=
begin
unfold interior closure is_closed,
rw [compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of],
simp only [compl_subset_compl]
end
@[simp] lemma interior_compl {s : set α} : interior (- s) = - closure s :=
by simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
@[simp] lemma closure_compl {s : set α} : closure (- s) = - interior s :=
by simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, is_open o → a ∈ o → (o ∩ s).nonempty :=
⟨λ h o oo ao, classical.by_contradiction $ λ os,
have s ⊆ -o, from λ x xs xo, os ⟨x, xo, xs⟩,
closure_minimal this (is_closed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
λ H c ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, classical.by_contradiction $ λ nc,
let ⟨x, hc, hs⟩ := (H _ h₁ nc) in hc (h₂ hs)⟩
lemma dense_iff_inter_open {s : set α} :
closure s = univ ↔ ∀ U, is_open U → U.nonempty → (U ∩ s).nonempty :=
begin
split ; intro h,
{ rintros U U_op ⟨x, x_in⟩,
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (by simp only [h]) U U_op x_in },
{ apply eq_univ_of_forall, intro x,
rw mem_closure_iff,
intros U U_op x_in,
exact h U U_op ⟨_, x_in⟩ },
end
lemma dense_of_subset_dense {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hd : closure s₁ = univ) :
closure s₂ = univ :=
by { rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← hd], exact closure_mono h }
/-- The frontier of a set is the set of points between the closure and interior. -/
def frontier (s : set α) : set α := closure s \ interior s
lemma frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure {s : set α} :
frontier s = closure s ∩ closure (- s) :=
by rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
/-- The complement of a set has the same frontier as the original set. -/
@[simp] lemma frontier_compl (s : set α) : frontier (-s) = frontier s :=
by simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_compl, inter_comm]
lemma frontier_inter_subset (s t : set α) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ⊆ (frontier s ∩ closure t) ∪ (closure s ∩ frontier t) :=
begin
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_inter, closure_union],
convert inter_subset_inter_left _ (closure_inter_subset_inter_closure s t),
simp only [inter_distrib_left, inter_distrib_right, inter_assoc],
congr' 2,
apply inter_comm
end
lemma frontier_union_subset (s t : set α) :
frontier (s ∪ t) ⊆ (frontier s ∩ closure (-t)) ∪ (closure (-s) ∩ frontier t) :=
by simpa only [frontier_compl, (compl_union _ _).symm]
using frontier_inter_subset (-s) (-t)
lemma is_closed.frontier_eq {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s) : frontier s = s \ interior s :=
by rw [frontier, closure_eq_of_is_closed hs]
lemma is_open.frontier_eq {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) : frontier s = closure s \ s :=
by rw [frontier, interior_eq_of_open hs]
/-- The frontier of a set is closed. -/
lemma is_closed_frontier {s : set α} : is_closed (frontier s) :=
by rw frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure; exact is_closed_inter is_closed_closure is_closed_closure
/-- The frontier of a set has no interior point. -/
lemma interior_frontier {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) : interior (frontier s) = ∅ :=
begin
have A : frontier s = s \ interior s, from h.frontier_eq,
have B : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s, by rw A; exact interior_mono (diff_subset _ _),
have C : interior (frontier s) ⊆ frontier s := interior_subset,
have : interior (frontier s) ⊆ (interior s) ∩ (s \ interior s) :=
subset_inter B (by simpa [A] using C),
rwa [inter_diff_self, subset_empty_iff] at this,
end
/-- neighbourhood filter -/
def nhds (a : α) : filter α := (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, principal s)
localized "notation `𝓝` := nhds" in topological_space
lemma nhds_def (a : α) : 𝓝 a = (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, principal s) := rfl
lemma nhds_basis_opens (a : α) : (𝓝 a).has_basis (λ s : set α, a ∈ s ∧ is_open s) (λ x, x) :=
has_basis_binfi_principal
(λ s ⟨has, hs⟩ t ⟨hat, ht⟩, ⟨s ∩ t, ⟨⟨has, hat⟩, is_open_inter hs ht⟩,
⟨inter_subset_left _ _, inter_subset_right _ _⟩⟩)
⟨univ, ⟨mem_univ a, is_open_univ⟩⟩
lemma le_nhds_iff {f a} : f ≤ 𝓝 a ↔ ∀ s : set α, a ∈ s → is_open s → s ∈ f :=
by simp [nhds_def]
lemma nhds_le_of_le {f a} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ s) (o : is_open s) (sf : principal s ≤ f) : 𝓝 a ≤ f :=
by rw nhds_def; exact infi_le_of_le s (infi_le_of_le ⟨h, o⟩ sf)
lemma mem_nhds_sets_iff {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃t⊆s, is_open t ∧ a ∈ t :=
(nhds_basis_opens a).mem_iff.trans
⟨λ ⟨t, ⟨hat, ht⟩, hts⟩, ⟨t, hts, ht, hat⟩, λ ⟨t, hts, ht, hat⟩, ⟨t, ⟨hat, ht⟩, hts⟩⟩
lemma map_nhds {a : α} {f : α → β} :
map f (𝓝 a) = (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, principal (image f s)) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).map f).eq_binfi
attribute [irreducible] nhds
lemma mem_of_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝 a → a ∈ s :=
λ H, let ⟨t, ht, _, hs⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.1 H in ht hs
lemma filter.eventually.self_of_nhds {p : α → Prop} {a : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, p y) : p a :=
mem_of_nhds h
lemma mem_nhds_sets {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
mem_nhds_sets_iff.2 ⟨s, subset.refl _, hs, ha⟩
theorem all_mem_nhds (x : α) (P : set α → Prop) (hP : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, P s) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → x ∈ s → P s) :=
iff.intro
(λ h s os xs, h s (mem_nhds_sets os xs))
(λ h t,
begin
change t ∈ 𝓝 x → P t,
rw mem_nhds_sets_iff,
rintros ⟨s, hs, opens, xs⟩,
exact hP _ _ hs (h s opens xs),
end)
theorem all_mem_nhds_filter (x : α) (f : set α → set β) (hf : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → f s ⊆ f t)
(l : filter β) :
(∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, f s ∈ l) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → x ∈ s → f s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds _ _ (λ s t ssubt h, mem_sets_of_superset h (hf s t ssubt))
theorem rtendsto_nhds {r : rel β α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
rtendsto r l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → r.core s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (λ s t, id) _
theorem rtendsto'_nhds {r : rel β α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
rtendsto' r l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → r.preimage s ∈ l) :=
by { rw [rtendsto'_def], apply all_mem_nhds_filter, apply rel.preimage_mono }
theorem ptendsto_nhds {f : β →. α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
ptendsto f l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f.core s ∈ l) :=
rtendsto_nhds
theorem ptendsto'_nhds {f : β →. α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
ptendsto' f l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f.preimage s ∈ l) :=
rtendsto'_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f ⁻¹' s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (λ s t h, preimage_mono h) _
lemma tendsto_const_nhds {a : α} {f : filter β} : tendsto (λb:β, a) f (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_nhds.mpr $ assume s hs ha, univ_mem_sets' $ assume _, ha
lemma pure_le_nhds : pure ≤ (𝓝 : α → filter α) :=
assume a s hs, mem_pure_sets.2 $ mem_of_nhds hs
lemma tendsto_pure_nhds {α : Type*} [topological_space β] (f : α → β) (a : α) :
tendsto f (pure a) (𝓝 (f a)) :=
begin
rw [tendsto, filter.map_pure],
exact pure_le_nhds (f a)
end
@[simp] lemma nhds_ne_bot {a : α} : 𝓝 a ≠ ⊥ :=
ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot pure_ne_bot (pure_le_nhds a)
lemma interior_eq_nhds {s : set α} : interior s = {a | 𝓝 a ≤ principal s} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_interior, le_principal_iff, mem_nhds_sets_iff]; refl
lemma mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ interior s ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
by simp only [interior_eq_nhds, le_principal_iff]; refl
lemma is_open_iff_nhds {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀a∈s, 𝓝 a ≤ principal s :=
calc is_open s ↔ s ⊆ interior s : subset_interior_iff_open.symm
... ↔ (∀a∈s, 𝓝 a ≤ principal s) : by rw [interior_eq_nhds]; refl
lemma is_open_iff_mem_nhds {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀a∈s, s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
is_open_iff_nhds.trans $ forall_congr $ λ _, imp_congr_right $ λ _, le_principal_iff
lemma closure_eq_nhds {s : set α} : closure s = {a | 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥} :=
calc closure s = - interior (- s) : closure_eq_compl_interior_compl
... = {a | ¬ 𝓝 a ≤ principal (-s)} : by rw [interior_eq_nhds]; refl
... = {a | 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥} : set.ext $ assume a, not_congr
(inf_eq_bot_iff_le_compl
(show principal s ⊔ principal (-s) = ⊤, by simp only [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ])
(by simp only [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty])).symm
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ 𝓝 a, (t ∩ s).nonempty :=
mem_closure_iff.trans
⟨λ H t ht, nonempty.mono
(inter_subset_inter_left _ interior_subset)
(H _ is_open_interior (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 ht)),
λ H o oo ao, H _ (mem_nhds_sets oo ao)⟩
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis {a : α} {p : β → Prop} {s : β → set α} (h : (𝓝 a).has_basis p s)
{t : set α} :
a ∈ closure t ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ y ∈ t, y ∈ s i :=
mem_closure_iff_nhds.trans
⟨λ H i hi, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := (H _ $ h.mem_of_mem hi) in ⟨x, hx.2, hx.1⟩,
λ H t' ht', let ⟨i, hi, hit⟩ := h.mem_iff.1 ht', ⟨x, xt, hx⟩ := H i hi in
⟨x, hit hx, xt⟩⟩
/-- `x` belongs to the closure of `s` if and only if some ultrafilter
supported on `s` converges to `x`. -/
lemma mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ (u : ultrafilter α), s ∈ u.val ∧ u.val ≤ 𝓝 x :=
begin
rw closure_eq_nhds, change 𝓝 x ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ ↔ _, symmetry,
convert exists_ultrafilter_iff _, ext u,
rw [←le_principal_iff, inf_comm, le_inf_iff]
end
lemma is_closed_iff_nhds {s : set α} : is_closed s ↔ ∀a, 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → a ∈ s :=
calc is_closed s ↔ closure s = s : by rw [closure_eq_iff_is_closed]
... ↔ closure s ⊆ s : ⟨assume h, by rw h, assume h, subset.antisymm h subset_closure⟩
... ↔ (∀a, 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → a ∈ s) : by rw [closure_eq_nhds]; refl
lemma closure_inter_open {s t : set α} (h : is_open s) : s ∩ closure t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) :=
assume a ⟨hs, ht⟩,
have s ∈ 𝓝 a, from mem_nhds_sets h hs,
have 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s = 𝓝 a, by rwa [inf_eq_left, le_principal_iff],
have 𝓝 a ⊓ principal (s ∩ t) ≠ ⊥,
from calc 𝓝 a ⊓ principal (s ∩ t) = 𝓝 a ⊓ (principal s ⊓ principal t) : by rw inf_principal
... = 𝓝 a ⊓ principal t : by rw [←inf_assoc, this]
... ≠ ⊥ : by rw [closure_eq_nhds] at ht; assumption,
by rwa [closure_eq_nhds]
lemma closure_diff {s t : set α} : closure s - closure t ⊆ closure (s - t) :=
calc closure s \ closure t = (- closure t) ∩ closure s : by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
... ⊆ closure (- closure t ∩ s) : closure_inter_open $ is_open_compl_iff.mpr $ is_closed_closure
... = closure (s \ closure t) : by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
... ⊆ closure (s \ t) : closure_mono $ diff_subset_diff (subset.refl s) subset_closure
lemma mem_of_closed_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a)) (hs : is_closed s) (h : f ⁻¹' s ∈ b) : a ∈ s :=
have b.map f ≤ 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s,
from le_trans (le_inf (le_refl _) (le_principal_iff.mpr h)) (inf_le_inf_right _ hf),
is_closed_iff_nhds.mp hs a $ ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (map_ne_bot hb) this
lemma mem_of_closed_of_tendsto' {f : β → α} {x : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hf : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hs : is_closed s) (h : x ⊓ principal (f ⁻¹' s) ≠ ⊥) : a ∈ s :=
is_closed_iff_nhds.mp hs _ $ ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (@map_ne_bot _ _ _ f h) $
le_inf (le_trans (map_mono $ inf_le_left) hf) $
le_trans (map_mono $ inf_le_right_of_le $
by simp only [comap_principal, le_principal_iff]; exact subset.refl _) (@map_comap_le _ _ _ f)
lemma mem_closure_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) : a ∈ closure s :=
mem_of_closed_of_tendsto hb hf (is_closed_closure) $
filter.mem_sets_of_superset h (preimage_mono subset_closure)
/-- Suppose that `f` sends the complement to `s` to a single point `a`, and `l` is some filter.
Then `f` tends to `a` along `l` restricted to `s` if and only it tends to `a` along `l`. -/
lemma tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {s : set β}
{a : α} (h : ∀ x ∉ s, f x = a) :
tendsto f (l ⊓ principal s) (𝓝 a) ↔ tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
begin
rw [tendsto_iff_comap, tendsto_iff_comap],
replace h : principal (-s) ≤ comap f (𝓝 a),
{ rintros U ⟨t, ht, htU⟩ x hx,
have : f x ∈ t, from (h x hx).symm ▸ mem_of_nhds ht,
exact htU this },
refine ⟨λ h', _, le_trans inf_le_left⟩,
have := sup_le h' h,
rw [sup_inf_right, sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ,
inf_top_eq, sup_le_iff] at this,
exact this.1
end
section lim
/-- If `f` is a filter, then `Lim f` is a limit of the filter, if it exists. -/
noncomputable def Lim [nonempty α] (f : filter α) : α := epsilon $ λa, f ≤ 𝓝 a
/-- If `f` is a filter in `β` and `g : β → α` is a function, then `lim f` is a limit of `g` at `f`,
if it exists. -/
noncomputable def lim [nonempty α] (f : filter β) (g : β → α) : α :=
Lim (f.map g)
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 a`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Lim f)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[nonempty α]` argument of `Lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[nonempty α]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
lemma Lim_spec {f : filter α} (h : ∃a, f ≤ 𝓝 a) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@Lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 a` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (lim f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[nonempty α]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[nonempty α]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
lemma lim_spec {f : filter β} {g : β → α} (h : ∃ a, tendsto g f (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto g f (𝓝 $ @lim _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g) :=
Lim_spec h
end lim
/- locally finite family [General Topology (Bourbaki, 1995)] -/
section locally_finite
/-- A family of sets in `set α` is locally finite if at every point `x:α`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` which meets only finitely many sets in the family -/
def locally_finite (f : β → set α) :=
∀x:α, ∃t ∈ 𝓝 x, finite {i | (f i ∩ t).nonempty }
lemma locally_finite_of_finite {f : β → set α} (h : finite (univ : set β)) : locally_finite f :=
assume x, ⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, finite_subset h $ subset_univ _⟩
lemma locally_finite_subset
{f₁ f₂ : β → set α} (hf₂ : locally_finite f₂) (hf : ∀b, f₁ b ⊆ f₂ b) : locally_finite f₁ :=
assume a,
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := hf₂ a in
⟨t, ht₁, finite_subset ht₂ $ assume i hi,
hi.mono $ inter_subset_inter (hf i) $ subset.refl _⟩
lemma is_closed_Union_of_locally_finite {f : β → set α}
(h₁ : locally_finite f) (h₂ : ∀i, is_closed (f i)) : is_closed (⋃i, f i) :=
is_open_iff_nhds.mpr $ assume a, assume h : a ∉ (⋃i, f i),
have ∀i, a ∈ -f i,
from assume i hi, h $ mem_Union.2 ⟨i, hi⟩,
have ∀i, - f i ∈ (𝓝 a),
by simp only [mem_nhds_sets_iff]; exact assume i, ⟨- f i, subset.refl _, h₂ i, this i⟩,
let ⟨t, h_sets, (h_fin : finite {i | (f i ∩ t).nonempty })⟩ := h₁ a in
calc 𝓝 a ≤ principal (t ∩ (⋂ i∈{i | (f i ∩ t).nonempty }, - f i)) :
begin
rw [le_principal_iff],
apply @filter.inter_mem_sets _ (𝓝 a) _ _ h_sets,
apply @filter.Inter_mem_sets _ (𝓝 a) _ _ _ h_fin,
exact assume i h, this i
end
... ≤ principal (- ⋃i, f i) :
begin
simp only [principal_mono, subset_def, mem_compl_eq, mem_inter_eq,
mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq, mem_Union, and_imp, not_exists,
exists_imp_distrib, ne_empty_iff_nonempty, set.nonempty],
exact assume x xt ht i xfi, ht i x xfi xt xfi
end
end locally_finite
end topological_space
section continuous
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
open_locale topological_space
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous if the preimage
of every open set is open. -/
def continuous (f : α → β) := ∀s, is_open s → is_open (f ⁻¹' s)
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous at a point `x₀`
if `f x` tends to `f x₀` when `x` tends to `x₀`. -/
def continuous_at (f : α → β) (x : α) := tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x))
lemma continuous_at.tendsto {f : α → β} {x : α} (h : continuous_at f x) :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
lemma continuous_at.preimage_mem_nhds {f : α → β} {x : α} {t : set β} (h : continuous_at f x)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 x :=
h ht
lemma preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set β}
(hf : continuous f) : f⁻¹' (interior s) ⊆ interior (f⁻¹' s) :=
interior_maximal (preimage_mono interior_subset) (hf _ is_open_interior)
lemma continuous_id : continuous (id : α → α) :=
assume s h, h
lemma continuous.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : continuous g) (hf : continuous f) :
continuous (g ∘ f) :=
assume s h, hf _ (hg s h)
lemma continuous.iterate {f : α → α} (h : continuous f) (n : ℕ) : continuous (f^[n]) :=
nat.rec_on n continuous_id (λ n ihn, ihn.comp h)
lemma continuous_at.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {x : α}
(hg : continuous_at g (f x)) (hf : continuous_at f x) :
continuous_at (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp hf
lemma continuous.tendsto {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (x) :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).tendsto_iff $ nhds_basis_opens $ f x).2 $
λ t ⟨hxt, ht⟩, ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨hxt, hf _ ht⟩, subset.refl _⟩
lemma continuous.continuous_at {f : α → β} {x : α} (h : continuous f) :
continuous_at f x :=
h.tendsto x
lemma continuous_iff_continuous_at {f : α → β} : continuous f ↔ ∀ x, continuous_at f x :=
⟨continuous.tendsto,
assume hf : ∀x, tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)),
assume s, assume hs : is_open s,
have ∀a, f a ∈ s → s ∈ 𝓝 (f a),
from λ a ha, mem_nhds_sets hs ha,
show is_open (f ⁻¹' s),
from is_open_iff_nhds.2 $ λ a ha, le_principal_iff.2 $ hf _ (this a ha)⟩
lemma continuous_const {b : β} : continuous (λa:α, b) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume a, tendsto_const_nhds
lemma continuous_at_const {x : α} {b : β} : continuous_at (λ a:α, b) x :=
continuous_const.continuous_at
lemma continuous_at_id {x : α} : continuous_at id x :=
continuous_id.continuous_at
lemma continuous_at.iterate {f : α → α} {x : α} (hf : continuous_at f x) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
continuous_at (f^[n]) x :=
nat.rec_on n continuous_at_id $ λ n ihn,
show continuous_at (f^[n] ∘ f) x,
from continuous_at.comp (hx.symm ▸ ihn) hf
lemma continuous_iff_is_closed {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔ (∀s, is_closed s → is_closed (f ⁻¹' s)) :=
⟨assume hf s hs, hf (-s) hs,
assume hf s, by rw [←is_closed_compl_iff, ←is_closed_compl_iff]; exact hf _⟩
lemma continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter {f : α → β} (x) : continuous_at f x ↔
∀ g, is_ultrafilter g → g ≤ 𝓝 x → g.map f ≤ 𝓝 (f x) :=
tendsto_iff_ultrafilter f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x))
lemma continuous_iff_ultrafilter {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔ ∀ x g, is_ultrafilter g → g ≤ 𝓝 x → g.map f ≤ 𝓝 (f x) :=
by simp only [continuous_iff_continuous_at, continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter]
/-- A piecewise defined function `if p then f else g` is continuous, if both `f` and `g`
are continuous, and they coincide on the frontier (boundary) of the set `{a | p a}`. -/
lemma continuous_if {p : α → Prop} {f g : α → β} {h : ∀a, decidable (p a)}
(hp : ∀a∈frontier {a | p a}, f a = g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
continuous (λa, @ite (p a) (h a) β (f a) (g a)) :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.mpr $
assume s hs,
have (λa, ite (p a) (f a) (g a)) ⁻¹' s =
(closure {a | p a} ∩ f ⁻¹' s) ∪ (closure {a | ¬ p a} ∩ g ⁻¹' s),
from set.ext $ assume a,
classical.by_cases
(assume : a ∈ frontier {a | p a},
have hac : a ∈ closure {a | p a}, from this.left,
have hai : a ∈ closure {a | ¬ p a},
from have a ∈ - interior {a | p a}, from this.right, by rwa [←closure_compl] at this,
by by_cases p a; simp [h, hp a this, hac, hai, iff_def] {contextual := tt})
(assume hf : a ∈ - frontier {a | p a},
classical.by_cases
(assume : p a,
have hc : a ∈ closure {a | p a}, from subset_closure this,
have hnc : a ∉ closure {a | ¬ p a},
by show a ∉ closure (- {a | p a}); rw [closure_compl]; simpa [frontier, hc] using hf,
by simp [this, hc, hnc])
(assume : ¬ p a,
have hc : a ∈ closure {a | ¬ p a}, from subset_closure this,
have hnc : a ∉ closure {a | p a},
begin
have hc : a ∈ closure (- {a | p a}), from hc,
simp [closure_compl] at hc,
simpa [frontier, hc] using hf
end,
by simp [this, hc, hnc])),
by rw [this]; exact is_closed_union
(is_closed_inter is_closed_closure $ continuous_iff_is_closed.mp hf s hs)
(is_closed_inter is_closed_closure $ continuous_iff_is_closed.mp hg s hs)
/- Continuity and partial functions -/
/-- Continuity of a partial function -/
def pcontinuous (f : α →. β) := ∀ s, is_open s → is_open (f.preimage s)
lemma open_dom_of_pcontinuous {f : α →. β} (h : pcontinuous f) : is_open f.dom :=
by rw [←pfun.preimage_univ]; exact h _ is_open_univ
lemma pcontinuous_iff' {f : α →. β} :
pcontinuous f ↔ ∀ {x y} (h : y ∈ f x), ptendsto' f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x y h',
simp only [ptendsto'_def, mem_nhds_sets_iff],
rintros s ⟨t, tsubs, opent, yt⟩,
exact ⟨f.preimage t, pfun.preimage_mono _ tsubs, h _ opent, ⟨y, yt, h'⟩⟩
},
intros hf s os,
rw is_open_iff_nhds,
rintros x ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩ t,
rw [mem_principal_sets],
assume h : f.preimage s ⊆ t,
change t ∈ 𝓝 x,
apply mem_sets_of_superset _ h,
have h' : ∀ s ∈ 𝓝 y, f.preimage s ∈ 𝓝 x,
{ intros s hs,
have : ptendsto' f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) := hf fxy,
rw ptendsto'_def at this,
exact this s hs },
show f.preimage s ∈ 𝓝 x,
apply h', rw mem_nhds_sets_iff, exact ⟨s, set.subset.refl _, os, ys⟩
end
lemma image_closure_subset_closure_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous f) :
f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
have ∀ (a : α), 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → 𝓝 (f a) ⊓ principal (f '' s) ≠ ⊥,
from assume a ha,
have h₁ : ¬ map f (𝓝 a ⊓ principal s) = ⊥,
by rwa[map_eq_bot_iff],
have h₂ : map f (𝓝 a ⊓ principal s) ≤ 𝓝 (f a) ⊓ principal (f '' s),
from le_inf
(le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) $ by rw [continuous_iff_continuous_at] at h; exact h a)
(le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) $ by simp; exact subset.refl _),
ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot h₁ h₂,
by simp [image_subset_iff, closure_eq_nhds]; assumption
lemma mem_closure {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} {a : α}
(hf : continuous f) (ha : a ∈ closure s) (ht : ∀a∈s, f a ∈ t) : f a ∈ closure t :=
subset.trans (image_closure_subset_closure_image hf) (closure_mono $ image_subset_iff.2 ht) $
(mem_image_of_mem f ha)
end continuous
|
c862576fc4f2f9bdcaea69569cb1a05a2cbb373a | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /test/monotonicity/test_cases.lean | 856da9ef1852e515732cad3ee075052b374a0547 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,122 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Simon Hudon
-/
import tactic.monotonicity.interactive
open list tactic tactic.interactive
meta class elaborable (α : Type) (β : out_param Type) :=
(elaborate : α → tactic β)
export elaborable (elaborate)
meta instance : elaborable pexpr expr :=
⟨ to_expr ⟩
meta instance elaborable_list {α α'} [elaborable α α'] : elaborable (list α) (list α') :=
⟨ mmap elaborate ⟩
meta def mono_function.elaborate : mono_function ff → tactic mono_function
| (mono_function.non_assoc x y z) :=
mono_function.non_assoc <$> elaborate x
<*> elaborate y
<*> elaborate z
| (mono_function.assoc x y z) :=
mono_function.assoc <$> elaborate x
<*> traverse elaborate y
<*> traverse elaborate z
| (mono_function.assoc_comm x y) :=
mono_function.assoc_comm <$> elaborate x
<*> elaborate y
meta instance elaborable_mono_function : elaborable (mono_function ff) mono_function :=
⟨ mono_function.elaborate ⟩
meta instance prod_elaborable {α α' β β' : Type} [elaborable α α'] [elaborable β β']
: elaborable (α × β) (α' × β') :=
⟨ λ i, prod.rec_on i (λ x y, prod.mk <$> elaborate x <*> elaborate y) ⟩
meta def parse_mono_function' (l r : pexpr) :=
do l' ← to_expr l,
r' ← to_expr r,
parse_ac_mono_function { mono_cfg . } l' r'
run_cmd
do xs ← mmap to_expr [``(1),``(2),``(3)],
ys ← mmap to_expr [``(1),``(2),``(4)],
x ← match_prefix { unify := ff } xs ys,
p ← elaborate ([``(1),``(2)] , [``(3)], [``(4)]),
guard $ x = p
run_cmd
do xs ← mmap to_expr [``(1),``(2),``(3),``(6),``(7)],
ys ← mmap to_expr [``(1),``(2),``(4),``(5),``(6),``(7)],
x ← match_assoc { unify := ff } xs ys,
p ← elaborate ([``(1), ``(2)], [``(3)], ([``(4), ``(5)], [``(6), ``(7)])),
guard (x = p)
run_cmd
do x ← to_expr ``(7 + 3 : ℕ) >>= check_ac,
x ← pp x.2.2.1,
let y := "(some (is_left_id.left_id, (is_right_id.right_id, 0)))",
guard (x.to_string = y) <|> fail ("guard: " ++ x.to_string)
meta def test_pp {α} [has_to_tactic_format α] (tag : format) (expected : string) (prog : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
do r ← prog,
pp_r ← pp r,
guard (pp_r.to_string = expected) <|> fail format!"test_pp: {tag}"
run_cmd
do test_pp "test1"
"(3 + 6, (4 + 5, ([], has_add.add _ 2 + 1)))"
(parse_mono_function' ``(1 + 3 + 2 + 6) ``(4 + 2 + 1 + 5)),
test_pp "test2"
"([1] ++ [3] ++ [2] ++ [6], ([4] ++ [2] ++ [1] ++ [5], ([], append none _ none)))"
(parse_mono_function' ``([1] ++ [3] ++ [2] ++ [6]) ``([4] ++ [2] ++ ([1] ++ [5]))),
test_pp "test3"
"([3] ++ [2], ([5] ++ [4], ([], append (some [1]) _ (some [2]))))"
(parse_mono_function' ``([1] ++ [3] ++ [2] ++ [2]) ``([1] ++ [5] ++ ([4] ++ [2])))
@[mono]
lemma test {α : Type*} [preorder α] : monotone (id : α → α) :=
λ x y h, h
example : id 0 ≤ id 1 :=
begin
mono,
simp,
end
|
6e776ff1ee85dc18b626bda9311ab88fae02c66f | a11f4536efad51bc2b648123619720f3b9318c0f | /src/uniq_lim_metric.lean | e09b2a8fa1bd391f7779b173f1bc28edbbabcc28 | [] | no_license | ezrasitorus/codewars_lean | 909471d43f5130669a90b8e11afc37aec2f21d8f | 6d1abcc1253403511f4cfd767c645596175e4fd3 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,659,589,352 | 1,603,281,507,000 | 1,603,281,507,000 | 288,579,451 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,347 | lean | import topology.metric_space.basic
import topology.uniform_space.basic
def converges_to {X : Type*} [metric_space X] (s : ℕ → X) (x : X) :=
∀ (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε), ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ (n : ℕ) (hn : N ≤ n), dist x (s n) < ε
notation s ` ⟶ ` x := converges_to s x
theorem limit_unique {X : Type*} [metric_space X] {s : ℕ → X}
(x₀ x₁ : X) (h₀ : s ⟶ x₀) (h₁ : s ⟶ x₁) :
x₀ = x₁ :=
begin
apply classical.by_contradiction,
intro h,
let ε' := (dist x₀ x₁),
have ε'_pos : 0 < ε',
exact dist_pos.mpr h,
let ε := ε'/2,
have ε_pos : 0 < ε,
exact half_pos ε'_pos,
rcases h₀ ε ε_pos with ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩,
rcases h₁ ε ε_pos with ⟨N₁, hN₁⟩,
let N := max N₀ N₁,
specialize hN₀ N (le_max_left N₀ N₁),
specialize hN₁ N (le_max_right N₀ N₁),
have key : ε' < ε',
calc
ε' = dist x₀ x₁ : rfl
... ≤ (dist x₀ (s N)) + (dist x₁ (s N)) : dist_triangle_right x₀ x₁ (s N)
... < ε + ε : add_lt_add hN₀ hN₁
... = ε' : add_halves ε',
exact (irrefl ε') key,
end
lemma easy {X : Type*} [metric_space X] (a b : X) (R : ℝ) : R - (dist a b) = R - (dist b a) :=
begin
rw dist_comm,
end
lemma easy2 {X : Type*} [metric_space X] (a b : X) (R : ℝ) : (dist a b) + R = (dist b a) + R :=
begin
rw dist_comm,
end
theorem limit_within_closed_bound {X : Type*} [metric_space X] {s : ℕ → X}
(x : X) (R : ℝ) (h₀ : s ⟶ x) (h₁ : ∀ n m : ℕ, dist (s n) (s m) < R) :
∀ n : ℕ, dist (s n) x ≤ R :=
begin
intro n,
apply classical.by_contradiction,
intro hf,
rw not_le at hf,
have help : 0 < (dist (s n) x - R) / 2,
suffices : 0 < (dist (s n) x - R),
exact half_pos this,
exact sub_pos.mpr hf,
rcases h₀ ((dist (s n) x - R) / 2) help with ⟨N, hN⟩,
specialize hN N (rfl.ge),
have key : dist (s n) (s N) > R,
have help' : (dist (s n) x) ≤ (dist (s n) (s N)) + (dist (s N) x),
apply dist_triangle,
calc
(dist (s n) (s N)) ≥ (dist (s n) x) - (dist (s N) x) : sub_le_iff_le_add.mpr help'
... = (dist (s n) x) - (dist x (s N)) : easy (s N) x (dist (s n) x)
... > (dist (s n) x) - (dist (s n) x - R) / 2 : sub_lt_sub_left hN (dist (s n) x)
... = (dist (s n) x + R) / 2 : by ring
... > (R + R) / 2 : by linarith
... = R : half_add_self R,
exact (lt_asymm (h₁ n N)) key,
end
theorem limit_of_bounded_sequence_in_bound
(s : ℕ → ℝ)
(x B : ℝ)
(h_lim : s ⟶ x)
(zero : s 0 = 0)
(s_bounded : ∀ n : ℕ, dist 0 (s n) < B)
: ∃ B', dist 0 x ≤ B' :=
begin
let B' := 2 * B,
use B',
have help : ∀ n m : ℕ, dist (s n) (s m) < B',
intros n m,
calc
dist (s n) (s m) ≤ dist (s n) 0 + dist 0 (s m) : dist_triangle (s n) 0 (s m)
... = dist 0 (s n) + dist 0 (s m) : easy2 _ _ _
... < B + dist 0 (s m) : add_lt_add_right (s_bounded n) (dist 0 (s m))
... < B + B : (add_lt_add_left (s_bounded m) B)
... = 2 * B : ((two_mul B).symm)
... = B' : rfl,
have overkill : dist (s 0) x ≤ B',
exact limit_within_closed_bound x B' h_lim help 0,
rwa ← zero,
end |
453b9874454e8378383c89634fe66f7833131fca | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/data/set/equitable.lean | e0687fb4ba4b5b4293671906172323f343979050 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,074 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import algebra.big_operators.order
import data.nat.basic
/-!
# Equitable functions
This file defines equitable functions.
A function `f` is equitable on a set `s` if `f a₁ ≤ f a₂ + 1` for all `a₁, a₂ ∈ s`. This is mostly
useful when the codomain of `f` is `ℕ` or `ℤ` (or more generally a successor order).
## TODO
`ℕ` can be replaced by any `succ_order` + `conditionally_complete_monoid`, but we don't have the
latter yet.
-/
open_locale big_operators
variables {α β : Type*}
namespace set
/-- A set is equitable if no element value is more than one bigger than another. -/
def equitable_on [has_le β] [has_add β] [has_one β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a₁ a₂⦄, a₁ ∈ s → a₂ ∈ s → f a₁ ≤ f a₂ + 1
@[simp]
lemma equitable_on_empty [has_le β] [has_add β] [has_one β] (f : α → β) : equitable_on ∅ f :=
λ a _ ha, (set.not_mem_empty _ ha).elim
lemma equitable_on_iff_exists_le_le_add_one {s : set α} {f : α → ℕ} :
s.equitable_on f ↔ ∃ b, ∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ f a ∧ f a ≤ b + 1 :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ ⟨b, hb⟩ x y hx hy, (hb x hx).2.trans (add_le_add_right (hb y hy).1 _)⟩,
obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty,
{ simp },
intros hs,
by_cases h : ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≤ f y,
{ exact ⟨f x, λ y hy, ⟨h _ hy, hs hy hx⟩⟩ },
push_neg at h,
obtain ⟨w, hw, hwx⟩ := h,
refine ⟨f w, λ y hy, ⟨nat.le_of_succ_le_succ _, hs hy hw⟩⟩,
rw (nat.succ_le_of_lt hwx).antisymm (hs hx hw),
exact hs hx hy,
end
lemma equitable_on_iff_exists_image_subset_Icc {s : set α} {f : α → ℕ} :
s.equitable_on f ↔ ∃ b, f '' s ⊆ Icc b (b + 1) :=
by simpa only [image_subset_iff] using equitable_on_iff_exists_le_le_add_one
lemma equitable_on_iff_exists_eq_eq_add_one {s : set α} {f : α → ℕ} :
s.equitable_on f ↔ ∃ b, ∀ a ∈ s, f a = b ∨ f a = b + 1 :=
by simp_rw [equitable_on_iff_exists_le_le_add_one, nat.le_and_le_add_one_iff]
section ordered_semiring
variables [ordered_semiring β]
lemma subsingleton.equitable_on {s : set α} (hs : s.subsingleton) (f : α → β) : s.equitable_on f :=
λ i j hi hj, by { rw hs hi hj, exact le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one }
lemma equitable_on_singleton (a : α) (f : α → β) : set.equitable_on {a} f :=
set.subsingleton_singleton.equitable_on f
end ordered_semiring
end set
open set
namespace finset
variables {s : finset α} {f : α → ℕ} {a : α}
lemma equitable_on_iff_le_le_add_one :
equitable_on (s : set α) f ↔
∀ a ∈ s, (∑ i in s, f i) / s.card ≤ f a ∧ f a ≤ (∑ i in s, f i) / s.card + 1 :=
begin
rw set.equitable_on_iff_exists_le_le_add_one,
refine ⟨_, λ h, ⟨_, h⟩ ⟩,
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩,
by_cases h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = b + 1,
{ intros a ha,
rw [h _ ha, sum_const_nat h, nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (card_pos.2 ⟨a, ha⟩)],
exact ⟨le_rfl, nat.le_succ _⟩ },
push_neg at h,
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := h,
suffices h : b = (∑ i in s, f i) / s.card,
{ simp_rw ←h,
apply hb },
symmetry,
refine nat.div_eq_of_lt_le (le_trans (by simp [mul_comm]) (sum_le_sum (λ a ha, (hb a ha).1)))
((sum_lt_sum (λ a ha, (hb a ha).2) ⟨_, hx₁, (hb _ hx₁).2.lt_of_ne hx₂⟩).trans_le _),
rw [mul_comm, sum_const_nat],
exact λ _ _, rfl,
end
lemma equitable_on.le (h : equitable_on (s : set α) f) (ha : a ∈ s) :
(∑ i in s, f i) / s.card ≤ f a :=
(equitable_on_iff_le_le_add_one.1 h a ha).1
lemma equitable_on.le_add_one (h : equitable_on (s : set α) f) (ha : a ∈ s) :
f a ≤ (∑ i in s, f i) / s.card + 1 :=
(equitable_on_iff_le_le_add_one.1 h a ha).2
lemma equitable_on_iff :
equitable_on (s : set α) f ↔
∀ a ∈ s, f a = (∑ i in s, f i) / s.card ∨ f a = (∑ i in s, f i) / s.card + 1 :=
by simp_rw [equitable_on_iff_le_le_add_one, nat.le_and_le_add_one_iff]
end finset
|
dd9ea8b97f6053682ab43d31ff5b1ffe9b0b4c72 | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/field_theory/algebraic_closure.lean | 44def92c7acfc8330b24b60b648f38239826f359 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,252 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.direct_limit
import field_theory.splitting_field
/-!
# Algebraic Closure
In this file we define the typeclass for algebraically closed fields and algebraic closures.
We also construct an algebraic closure for any field.
## Main Definitions
- `is_alg_closed k` is the typeclass saying `k` is an algebraically closed field, i.e. every
polynomial in `k` splits.
- `is_alg_closure k K` is the typeclass saying `K` is an algebraic closure of `k`.
- `algebraic_closure k` is an algebraic closure of `k` (in the same universe).
It is constructed by taking the polynomial ring generated by indeterminates `x_f`
corresponding to monic irreducible polynomials `f` with coefficients in `k`, and quotienting
out by a maximal ideal containing every `f(x_f)`, and then repeating this step countably
many times. See Exercise 1.13 in Atiyah--Macdonald.
## TODO
Show that any algebraic extension embeds into any algebraically closed extension (via Zorn's lemma).
## Tags
algebraic closure, algebraically closed
-/
universes u v w
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators
open polynomial
variables (k : Type u) [field k]
/-- Typeclass for algebraically closed fields.
To show `polynomial.splits p f` for an arbitrary ring homomorphism `f`,
see `is_alg_closed.splits_codomain` and `is_alg_closed.splits_domain`.
-/
class is_alg_closed : Prop :=
(splits : ∀ p : polynomial k, p.splits $ ring_hom.id k)
/-- Every polynomial splits in the field extension `f : K →+* k` if `k` is algebraically closed.
See also `is_alg_closed.splits_domain` for the case where `K` is algebraically closed.
-/
theorem is_alg_closed.splits_codomain {k K : Type*} [field k] [is_alg_closed k] [field K]
{f : K →+* k} (p : polynomial K) : p.splits f :=
by { convert is_alg_closed.splits (p.map f), simp [splits_map_iff] }
/-- Every polynomial splits in the field extension `f : K →+* k` if `K` is algebraically closed.
See also `is_alg_closed.splits_codomain` for the case where `k` is algebraically closed.
-/
theorem is_alg_closed.splits_domain {k K : Type*} [field k] [is_alg_closed k] [field K]
{f : k →+* K} (p : polynomial k) : p.splits f :=
polynomial.splits_of_splits_id _ $ is_alg_closed.splits _
namespace is_alg_closed
theorem of_exists_root (H : ∀ p : polynomial k, p.monic → irreducible p → ∃ x, p.eval x = 0) :
is_alg_closed k :=
⟨λ p, or.inr $ λ q hq hqp,
have irreducible (q * C (leading_coeff q)⁻¹),
by { rw ← coe_norm_unit_of_ne_zero hq.ne_zero,
exact irreducible_of_associated associated_normalize hq },
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := H (q * C (leading_coeff q)⁻¹) (monic_mul_leading_coeff_inv hq.ne_zero) this in
degree_mul_leading_coeff_inv q hq.ne_zero ▸ degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_root this hx⟩
lemma degree_eq_one_of_irreducible [is_alg_closed k] {p : polynomial k} (h_nz : p ≠ 0)
(hp : irreducible p) :
p.degree = 1 :=
degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_splits h_nz hp (is_alg_closed.splits_codomain _)
lemma algebra_map_surjective_of_is_integral {k K : Type*} [field k] [domain K]
[hk : is_alg_closed k] [algebra k K] (hf : algebra.is_integral k K) :
function.surjective (algebra_map k K) :=
begin
refine λ x, ⟨-((minpoly k x).coeff 0), _⟩,
have hq : (minpoly k x).leading_coeff = 1 := minpoly.monic (hf x),
have h : (minpoly k x).degree = 1 := degree_eq_one_of_irreducible k
(minpoly.ne_zero (hf x)) (minpoly.irreducible (hf x)),
have : (aeval x (minpoly k x)) = 0 := minpoly.aeval k x,
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one h, hq, C_1, one_mul,
aeval_add, aeval_X, aeval_C, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at this,
exact (ring_hom.map_neg (algebra_map k K) ((minpoly k x).coeff 0)).symm ▸ this.symm,
end
lemma algebra_map_surjective_of_is_integral' {k K : Type*} [field k] [integral_domain K]
[hk : is_alg_closed k] (f : k →+* K) (hf : f.is_integral) : function.surjective f :=
@algebra_map_surjective_of_is_integral k K _ _ _ f.to_algebra hf
lemma algebra_map_surjective_of_is_algebraic {k K : Type*} [field k] [domain K]
[hk : is_alg_closed k] [algebra k K] (hf : algebra.is_algebraic k K) :
function.surjective (algebra_map k K) :=
algebra_map_surjective_of_is_integral ((is_algebraic_iff_is_integral' k).mp hf)
end is_alg_closed
/-- Typeclass for an extension being an algebraic closure. -/
class is_alg_closure (K : Type v) [field K] [algebra k K] : Prop :=
(alg_closed : is_alg_closed K)
(algebraic : algebra.is_algebraic k K)
theorem is_alg_closure_iff (K : Type v) [field K] [algebra k K] :
is_alg_closure k K ↔ is_alg_closed K ∧ algebra.is_algebraic k K :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, λ h, ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
namespace algebraic_closure
open mv_polynomial
/-- The subtype of monic irreducible polynomials -/
@[reducible] def monic_irreducible : Type u :=
{ f : polynomial k // monic f ∧ irreducible f }
/-- Sends a monic irreducible polynomial `f` to `f(x_f)` where `x_f` is a formal indeterminate. -/
def eval_X_self (f : monic_irreducible k) : mv_polynomial (monic_irreducible k) k :=
polynomial.eval₂ mv_polynomial.C (X f) f
/-- The span of `f(x_f)` across monic irreducible polynomials `f` where `x_f` is an
indeterminate. -/
def span_eval : ideal (mv_polynomial (monic_irreducible k) k) :=
ideal.span $ set.range $ eval_X_self k
/-- Given a finset of monic irreducible polynomials, construct an algebra homomorphism to the
splitting field of the product of the polynomials sending each indeterminate `x_f` represented by
the polynomial `f` in the finset to a root of `f`. -/
def to_splitting_field (s : finset (monic_irreducible k)) :
mv_polynomial (monic_irreducible k) k →ₐ[k] splitting_field (∏ x in s, x : polynomial k) :=
mv_polynomial.aeval $ λ f,
if hf : f ∈ s
then root_of_splits _
((splits_prod_iff _ $ λ (j : monic_irreducible k) _, j.2.2.ne_zero).1
(splitting_field.splits _) f hf)
(mt is_unit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 f.2.2.not_unit)
else 37
theorem to_splitting_field_eval_X_self {s : finset (monic_irreducible k)} {f} (hf : f ∈ s) :
to_splitting_field k s (eval_X_self k f) = 0 :=
by { rw [to_splitting_field, eval_X_self, ← alg_hom.coe_to_ring_hom, hom_eval₂,
alg_hom.coe_to_ring_hom, mv_polynomial.aeval_X, dif_pos hf,
← algebra_map_eq, alg_hom.comp_algebra_map],
exact map_root_of_splits _ _ _ }
theorem span_eval_ne_top : span_eval k ≠ ⊤ :=
begin
rw [ideal.ne_top_iff_one, span_eval, ideal.span, ← set.image_univ,
finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total],
rintros ⟨v, _, hv⟩,
replace hv := congr_arg (to_splitting_field k v.support) hv,
rw [alg_hom.map_one, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum, alg_hom.map_sum, finset.sum_eq_zero] at hv,
{ exact zero_ne_one hv },
intros j hj,
rw [smul_eq_mul, alg_hom.map_mul, to_splitting_field_eval_X_self k hj, mul_zero]
end
/-- A random maximal ideal that contains `span_eval k` -/
def max_ideal : ideal (mv_polynomial (monic_irreducible k) k) :=
classical.some $ ideal.exists_le_maximal _ $ span_eval_ne_top k
instance max_ideal.is_maximal : (max_ideal k).is_maximal :=
(classical.some_spec $ ideal.exists_le_maximal _ $ span_eval_ne_top k).1
theorem le_max_ideal : span_eval k ≤ max_ideal k :=
(classical.some_spec $ ideal.exists_le_maximal _ $ span_eval_ne_top k).2
/-- The first step of constructing `algebraic_closure`: adjoin a root of all monic polynomials -/
def adjoin_monic : Type u :=
(max_ideal k).quotient
instance adjoin_monic.field : field (adjoin_monic k) :=
ideal.quotient.field _
instance adjoin_monic.inhabited : inhabited (adjoin_monic k) := ⟨37⟩
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism to `adjoin_monic k`. -/
def to_adjoin_monic : k →+* adjoin_monic k :=
(ideal.quotient.mk _).comp C
instance adjoin_monic.algebra : algebra k (adjoin_monic k) :=
(to_adjoin_monic k).to_algebra
theorem adjoin_monic.algebra_map : algebra_map k (adjoin_monic k) = (ideal.quotient.mk _).comp C :=
rfl
theorem adjoin_monic.is_integral (z : adjoin_monic k) : is_integral k z :=
let ⟨p, hp⟩ := ideal.quotient.mk_surjective z in hp ▸
mv_polynomial.induction_on p (λ x, is_integral_algebra_map) (λ p q, is_integral_add)
(λ p f ih, @is_integral_mul _ _ _ _ _ _ (ideal.quotient.mk _ _) ih ⟨f, f.2.1,
by { erw [adjoin_monic.algebra_map, ← hom_eval₂,
ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem],
exact le_max_ideal k (ideal.subset_span ⟨f, rfl⟩) }⟩)
theorem adjoin_monic.exists_root {f : polynomial k} (hfm : f.monic) (hfi : irreducible f) :
∃ x : adjoin_monic k, f.eval₂ (to_adjoin_monic k) x = 0 :=
⟨ideal.quotient.mk _ $ X (⟨f, hfm, hfi⟩ : monic_irreducible k),
by { rw [to_adjoin_monic, ← hom_eval₂, ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem],
exact le_max_ideal k (ideal.subset_span $ ⟨_, rfl⟩) }⟩
/-- The `n`th step of constructing `algebraic_closure`, together with its `field` instance. -/
def step_aux (n : ℕ) : Σ α : Type u, field α :=
nat.rec_on n ⟨k, infer_instance⟩ $ λ n ih, ⟨@adjoin_monic ih.1 ih.2, @adjoin_monic.field ih.1 ih.2⟩
/-- The `n`th step of constructing `algebraic_closure`. -/
def step (n : ℕ) : Type u :=
(step_aux k n).1
instance step.field (n : ℕ) : field (step k n) :=
(step_aux k n).2
instance step.inhabited (n) : inhabited (step k n) := ⟨37⟩
/-- The canonical inclusion to the `0`th step. -/
def to_step_zero : k →+* step k 0 :=
ring_hom.id k
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism to the next step. -/
def to_step_succ (n : ℕ) : step k n →+* step k (n + 1) :=
@to_adjoin_monic (step k n) (step.field k n)
instance step.algebra_succ (n) : algebra (step k n) (step k (n + 1)) :=
(to_step_succ k n).to_algebra
theorem to_step_succ.exists_root {n} {f : polynomial (step k n)}
(hfm : f.monic) (hfi : irreducible f) :
∃ x : step k (n + 1), f.eval₂ (to_step_succ k n) x = 0 :=
@adjoin_monic.exists_root _ (step.field k n) _ hfm hfi
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism to a step with a greater index. -/
def to_step_of_le (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) : step k m →+* step k n :=
{ to_fun := nat.le_rec_on h (λ n, to_step_succ k n),
map_one' := begin
induction h with n h ih, { exact nat.le_rec_on_self 1 },
rw [nat.le_rec_on_succ h, ih, ring_hom.map_one]
end,
map_mul' := λ x y, begin
induction h with n h ih, { simp_rw nat.le_rec_on_self },
simp_rw [nat.le_rec_on_succ h, ih, ring_hom.map_mul]
end,
map_zero' := begin
induction h with n h ih, { exact nat.le_rec_on_self 0 },
rw [nat.le_rec_on_succ h, ih, ring_hom.map_zero]
end,
map_add' := λ x y, begin
induction h with n h ih, { simp_rw nat.le_rec_on_self },
simp_rw [nat.le_rec_on_succ h, ih, ring_hom.map_add]
end }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_step_of_le (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) :
(to_step_of_le k m n h : step k m → step k n) = nat.le_rec_on h (λ n, to_step_succ k n) :=
rfl
instance step.algebra (n) : algebra k (step k n) :=
(to_step_of_le k 0 n n.zero_le).to_algebra
instance step.scalar_tower (n) : is_scalar_tower k (step k n) (step k (n + 1)) :=
is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq $ λ z,
@nat.le_rec_on_succ (step k) 0 n n.zero_le (n + 1).zero_le (λ n, to_step_succ k n) z
theorem step.is_integral (n) : ∀ z : step k n, is_integral k z :=
nat.rec_on n (λ z, is_integral_algebra_map) $ λ n ih z,
is_integral_trans ih _ (adjoin_monic.is_integral (step k n) z : _)
instance to_step_of_le.directed_system :
directed_system (step k) (λ i j h, to_step_of_le k i j h) :=
⟨λ i x h, nat.le_rec_on_self x, λ i₁ i₂ i₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ x, (nat.le_rec_on_trans h₁₂ h₂₃ x).symm⟩
end algebraic_closure
/-- The canonical algebraic closure of a field, the direct limit of adding roots to the field for
each polynomial over the field. -/
def algebraic_closure : Type u :=
ring.direct_limit (algebraic_closure.step k) (λ i j h, algebraic_closure.to_step_of_le k i j h)
namespace algebraic_closure
instance : field (algebraic_closure k) :=
field.direct_limit.field _ _
instance : inhabited (algebraic_closure k) := ⟨37⟩
/-- The canonical ring embedding from the `n`th step to the algebraic closure. -/
def of_step (n : ℕ) : step k n →+* algebraic_closure k :=
ring.direct_limit.of _ _ _
instance algebra_of_step (n) : algebra (step k n) (algebraic_closure k) :=
(of_step k n).to_algebra
theorem of_step_succ (n : ℕ) : (of_step k (n + 1)).comp (to_step_succ k n) = of_step k n :=
ring_hom.ext $ λ x, show ring.direct_limit.of (step k) (λ i j h, to_step_of_le k i j h) _ _ = _,
by { convert ring.direct_limit.of_f n.le_succ x, ext x, exact (nat.le_rec_on_succ' x).symm }
theorem exists_of_step (z : algebraic_closure k) : ∃ n x, of_step k n x = z :=
ring.direct_limit.exists_of z
-- slow
theorem exists_root {f : polynomial (algebraic_closure k)}
(hfm : f.monic) (hfi : irreducible f) :
∃ x : algebraic_closure k, f.eval x = 0 :=
begin
have : ∃ n p, polynomial.map (of_step k n) p = f,
{ convert ring.direct_limit.polynomial.exists_of f },
unfreezingI { obtain ⟨n, p, rfl⟩ := this },
rw monic_map_iff at hfm,
have := hfm.irreducible_of_irreducible_map (of_step k n) p hfi,
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := to_step_succ.exists_root k hfm this,
refine ⟨of_step k (n + 1) x, _⟩,
rw [← of_step_succ k n, eval_map, ← hom_eval₂, hx, ring_hom.map_zero]
end
instance : is_alg_closed (algebraic_closure k) :=
is_alg_closed.of_exists_root _ $ λ f, exists_root k
instance : algebra k (algebraic_closure k) :=
(of_step k 0).to_algebra
/-- Canonical algebra embedding from the `n`th step to the algebraic closure. -/
def of_step_hom (n) : step k n →ₐ[k] algebraic_closure k :=
{ commutes' := λ x, ring.direct_limit.of_f n.zero_le x,
.. of_step k n }
theorem is_algebraic : algebra.is_algebraic k (algebraic_closure k) :=
λ z, (is_algebraic_iff_is_integral _).2 $ let ⟨n, x, hx⟩ := exists_of_step k z in
hx ▸ is_integral_alg_hom (of_step_hom k n) (step.is_integral k n x)
instance : is_alg_closure k (algebraic_closure k) :=
⟨algebraic_closure.is_alg_closed k, is_algebraic k⟩
end algebraic_closure
/--
Every element `f` in a nontrivial finite-dimensional algebra `A`
over an algebraically closed field `K`
has non-empty spectrum:
that is, there is some `c : K` so `f - c • 1` is not invertible.
-/
-- We will use this both to show eigenvalues exist, and to prove Schur's lemma.
lemma exists_spectrum_of_is_alg_closed_of_finite_dimensional (𝕜 : Type*) [field 𝕜] [is_alg_closed 𝕜]
{A : Type*} [nontrivial A] [ring A] [algebra 𝕜 A] [I : finite_dimensional 𝕜 A] (f : A) :
∃ c : 𝕜, ¬ is_unit (f - algebra_map 𝕜 A c) :=
begin
obtain ⟨p, ⟨h_mon, h_eval_p⟩⟩ := is_integral_of_noetherian I f,
have nu : ¬ is_unit (aeval f p), { rw [←aeval_def] at h_eval_p, rw h_eval_p, simp, },
rw [eq_prod_roots_of_monic_of_splits_id h_mon (is_alg_closed.splits p),
←multiset.prod_to_list, alg_hom.map_list_prod] at nu,
replace nu := mt list.prod_is_unit nu,
simp only [not_forall, exists_prop, aeval_C, multiset.mem_to_list,
list.mem_map, aeval_X, exists_exists_and_eq_and, multiset.mem_map, alg_hom.map_sub] at nu,
exact ⟨nu.some, nu.some_spec.2⟩,
end
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.