blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fe9401bf6fbaa7258b9d6cb3c8b90a9728c98f91 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/tactic/norm_num.lean | 4e570f106fce3aedac0eb685d18bf8f99a3f81b4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62,953 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Simon Hudon All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.rat.cast
import data.rat.meta_defs
/-!
# `norm_num`
Evaluating arithmetic expressions including `*`, `+`, `-`, `^`, `≤`.
-/
universes u v w
namespace tactic
namespace instance_cache
/-- Faster version of `mk_app ``bit0 [e]`. -/
meta def mk_bit0 (c : instance_cache) (e : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
do (c, ai) ← c.get ``has_add,
return (c, (expr.const ``bit0 [c.univ]).mk_app [c.α, ai, e])
/-- Faster version of `mk_app ``bit1 [e]`. -/
meta def mk_bit1 (c : instance_cache) (e : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
do (c, ai) ← c.get ``has_add,
(c, oi) ← c.get ``has_one,
return (c, (expr.const ``bit1 [c.univ]).mk_app [c.α, oi, ai, e])
end instance_cache
end tactic
open tactic
/-!
Each lemma in this file is written the way it is to exactly match (with no defeq reduction allowed)
the conclusion of some lemma generated by the proof procedure that uses it. That proof procedure
should describe the shape of the generated lemma in its docstring.
-/
namespace norm_num
variable {α : Type u}
lemma subst_into_add {α} [has_add α] (l r tl tr t)
(prl : (l : α) = tl) (prr : r = tr) (prt : tl + tr = t) : l + r = t :=
by rw [prl, prr, prt]
lemma subst_into_mul {α} [has_mul α] (l r tl tr t)
(prl : (l : α) = tl) (prr : r = tr) (prt : tl * tr = t) : l * r = t :=
by rw [prl, prr, prt]
lemma subst_into_neg {α} [has_neg α] (a ta t : α) (pra : a = ta) (prt : -ta = t) : -a = t :=
by simp [pra, prt]
/-- The result type of `match_numeral`, either `0`, `1`, or a top level
decomposition of `bit0 e` or `bit1 e`. The `other` case means it is not a numeral. -/
meta inductive match_numeral_result
| zero | one | bit0 (e : expr) | bit1 (e : expr) | other
/-- Unfold the top level constructor of the numeral expression. -/
meta def match_numeral : expr → match_numeral_result
| `(bit0 %%e) := match_numeral_result.bit0 e
| `(bit1 %%e) := match_numeral_result.bit1 e
| `(@has_zero.zero _ _) := match_numeral_result.zero
| `(@has_one.one _ _) := match_numeral_result.one
| _ := match_numeral_result.other
theorem zero_succ {α} [semiring α] : (0 + 1 : α) = 1 := zero_add _
theorem one_succ {α} [semiring α] : (1 + 1 : α) = 2 := rfl
theorem bit0_succ {α} [semiring α] (a : α) : bit0 a + 1 = bit1 a := rfl
theorem bit1_succ {α} [semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 = b) : bit1 a + 1 = bit0 b :=
h ▸ by simp [bit1, bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
section
open match_numeral_result
/-- Given `a`, `b` natural numerals, proves `⊢ a + 1 = b`, assuming that this is provable.
(It may prove garbage instead of failing if `a + 1 = b` is false.) -/
meta def prove_succ : instance_cache → expr → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| c e r := match match_numeral e with
| zero := c.mk_app ``zero_succ []
| one := c.mk_app ``one_succ []
| bit0 e := c.mk_app ``bit0_succ [e]
| bit1 e := do
let r := r.app_arg,
(c, p) ← prove_succ c e r,
c.mk_app ``bit1_succ [e, r, p]
| _ := failed
end
end
/-- Given `a` natural numeral, returns `(b, ⊢ a + 1 = b)`. -/
meta def prove_succ' (c : instance_cache) (a : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
do na ← a.to_nat,
(c, b) ← c.of_nat (na + 1),
(c, p) ← prove_succ c a b,
return (c, b, p)
theorem zero_adc {α} [semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 = b) : 0 + a + 1 = b := by rwa zero_add
theorem adc_zero {α} [semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 = b) : a + 0 + 1 = b := by rwa add_zero
theorem one_add {α} [semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 = b) : 1 + a = b := by rwa add_comm
theorem add_bit0_bit0 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b = c) : bit0 a + bit0 b = bit0 c :=
h ▸ by simp [bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem add_bit0_bit1 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b = c) : bit0 a + bit1 b = bit1 c :=
h ▸ by simp [bit0, bit1, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem add_bit1_bit0 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b = c) : bit1 a + bit0 b = bit1 c :=
h ▸ by simp [bit0, bit1, add_left_comm, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem add_bit1_bit1 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b + 1 = c) : bit1 a + bit1 b = bit0 c :=
h ▸ by simp [bit0, bit1, add_left_comm, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem adc_one_one {α} [semiring α] : (1 + 1 + 1 : α) = 3 := rfl
theorem adc_bit0_one {α} [semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 = b) : bit0 a + 1 + 1 = bit0 b :=
h ▸ by simp [bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem adc_one_bit0 {α} [semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 = b) : 1 + bit0 a + 1 = bit0 b :=
h ▸ by simp [bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem adc_bit1_one {α} [semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 = b) : bit1 a + 1 + 1 = bit1 b :=
h ▸ by simp [bit1, bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem adc_one_bit1 {α} [semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 = b) : 1 + bit1 a + 1 = bit1 b :=
h ▸ by simp [bit1, bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem adc_bit0_bit0 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b = c) : bit0 a + bit0 b + 1 = bit1 c :=
h ▸ by simp [bit1, bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem adc_bit1_bit0 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b + 1 = c) :
bit1 a + bit0 b + 1 = bit0 c :=
h ▸ by simp [bit1, bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem adc_bit0_bit1 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b + 1 = c) :
bit0 a + bit1 b + 1 = bit0 c :=
h ▸ by simp [bit1, bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem adc_bit1_bit1 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b + 1 = c) :
bit1 a + bit1 b + 1 = bit1 c :=
h ▸ by simp [bit1, bit0, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
section
open match_numeral_result
meta mutual def prove_add_nat, prove_adc_nat
with prove_add_nat : instance_cache → expr → expr → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| c a b r := do
match match_numeral a, match_numeral b with
| zero, _ := c.mk_app ``zero_add [b]
| _, zero := c.mk_app ``add_zero [a]
| _, one := prove_succ c a r
| one, _ := do (c, p) ← prove_succ c b r, c.mk_app ``one_add [b, r, p]
| bit0 a, bit0 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_add_nat c a b r, c.mk_app ``add_bit0_bit0 [a, b, r, p]
| bit0 a, bit1 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_add_nat c a b r, c.mk_app ``add_bit0_bit1 [a, b, r, p]
| bit1 a, bit0 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_add_nat c a b r, c.mk_app ``add_bit1_bit0 [a, b, r, p]
| bit1 a, bit1 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_adc_nat c a b r, c.mk_app ``add_bit1_bit1 [a, b, r, p]
| _, _ := failed
end
with prove_adc_nat : instance_cache → expr → expr → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| c a b r := do
match match_numeral a, match_numeral b with
| zero, _ := do (c, p) ← prove_succ c b r, c.mk_app ``zero_adc [b, r, p]
| _, zero := do (c, p) ← prove_succ c b r, c.mk_app ``adc_zero [b, r, p]
| one, one := c.mk_app ``adc_one_one []
| bit0 a, one :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_succ c a r, c.mk_app ``adc_bit0_one [a, r, p]
| one, bit0 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_succ c b r, c.mk_app ``adc_one_bit0 [b, r, p]
| bit1 a, one :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_succ c a r, c.mk_app ``adc_bit1_one [a, r, p]
| one, bit1 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_succ c b r, c.mk_app ``adc_one_bit1 [b, r, p]
| bit0 a, bit0 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_add_nat c a b r, c.mk_app ``adc_bit0_bit0 [a, b, r, p]
| bit0 a, bit1 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_adc_nat c a b r, c.mk_app ``adc_bit0_bit1 [a, b, r, p]
| bit1 a, bit0 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_adc_nat c a b r, c.mk_app ``adc_bit1_bit0 [a, b, r, p]
| bit1 a, bit1 b :=
do let r := r.app_arg, (c, p) ← prove_adc_nat c a b r, c.mk_app ``adc_bit1_bit1 [a, b, r, p]
| _, _ := failed
end
/-- Given `a`,`b`,`r` natural numerals, proves `⊢ a + b = r`. -/
add_decl_doc prove_add_nat
/-- Given `a`,`b`,`r` natural numerals, proves `⊢ a + b + 1 = r`. -/
add_decl_doc prove_adc_nat
/-- Given `a`,`b` natural numerals, returns `(r, ⊢ a + b = r)`. -/
meta def prove_add_nat' (c : instance_cache) (a b : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
do na ← a.to_nat,
nb ← b.to_nat,
(c, r) ← c.of_nat (na + nb),
(c, p) ← prove_add_nat c a b r,
return (c, r, p)
end
theorem bit0_mul {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) :
bit0 a * b = bit0 c := h ▸ by simp [bit0, add_mul]
theorem mul_bit0' {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) :
a * bit0 b = bit0 c := h ▸ by simp [bit0, mul_add]
theorem mul_bit0_bit0 {α} [semiring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) :
bit0 a * bit0 b = bit0 (bit0 c) := bit0_mul _ _ _ (mul_bit0' _ _ _ h)
theorem mul_bit1_bit1 {α} [semiring α] (a b c d e : α)
(hc : a * b = c) (hd : a + b = d) (he : bit0 c + d = e) :
bit1 a * bit1 b = bit1 e :=
by rw [← he, ← hd, ← hc]; simp [bit1, bit0, mul_add, add_mul, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
section
open match_numeral_result
/-- Given `a`,`b` natural numerals, returns `(r, ⊢ a * b = r)`. -/
meta def prove_mul_nat : instance_cache → expr → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
| ic a b :=
match match_numeral a, match_numeral b with
| zero, _ := do
(ic, z) ← ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``zero_mul [b],
return (ic, z, p)
| _, zero := do
(ic, z) ← ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_zero [a],
return (ic, z, p)
| one, _ := do (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``one_mul [b], return (ic, b, p)
| _, one := do (ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_one [a], return (ic, a, p)
| bit0 a, bit0 b := do
(ic, c, p) ← prove_mul_nat ic a b,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_bit0_bit0 [a, b, c, p],
(ic, c') ← ic.mk_bit0 c,
(ic, c') ← ic.mk_bit0 c',
return (ic, c', p)
| bit0 a, _ := do
(ic, c, p) ← prove_mul_nat ic a b,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``bit0_mul [a, b, c, p],
(ic, c') ← ic.mk_bit0 c,
return (ic, c', p)
| _, bit0 b := do
(ic, c, p) ← prove_mul_nat ic a b,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_bit0' [a, b, c, p],
(ic, c') ← ic.mk_bit0 c,
return (ic, c', p)
| bit1 a, bit1 b := do
(ic, c, pc) ← prove_mul_nat ic a b,
(ic, d, pd) ← prove_add_nat' ic a b,
(ic, c') ← ic.mk_bit0 c,
(ic, e, pe) ← prove_add_nat' ic c' d,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_bit1_bit1 [a, b, c, d, e, pc, pd, pe],
(ic, e') ← ic.mk_bit1 e,
return (ic, e', p)
| _, _ := failed
end
end
section
open match_numeral_result
/-- Given `a` a positive natural numeral, returns `⊢ 0 < a`. -/
meta def prove_pos_nat (c : instance_cache) : expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| e :=
match match_numeral e with
| one := c.mk_app ``zero_lt_one' []
| bit0 e := do (c, p) ← prove_pos_nat e, c.mk_app ``bit0_pos [e, p]
| bit1 e := do (c, p) ← prove_pos_nat e, c.mk_app ``bit1_pos' [e, p]
| _ := failed
end
end
/-- Given `a` a rational numeral, returns `⊢ 0 < a`. -/
meta def prove_pos (c : instance_cache) : expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| `(%%e₁ / %%e₂) := do
(c, p₁) ← prove_pos_nat c e₁, (c, p₂) ← prove_pos_nat c e₂,
c.mk_app ``div_pos [e₁, e₂, p₁, p₂]
| e := prove_pos_nat c e
/-- `match_neg (- e) = some e`, otherwise `none` -/
meta def match_neg : expr → option expr
| `(- %%e) := some e
| _ := none
/-- `match_sign (- e) = inl e`, `match_sign 0 = inr ff`, otherwise `inr tt` -/
meta def match_sign : expr → expr ⊕ bool
| `(- %%e) := sum.inl e
| `(has_zero.zero) := sum.inr ff
| _ := sum.inr tt
theorem ne_zero_of_pos {α} [ordered_add_comm_group α] (a : α) : 0 < a → a ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt
theorem ne_zero_neg {α} [add_group α] (a : α) : a ≠ 0 → -a ≠ 0 := mt neg_eq_zero.1
/-- Given `a` a rational numeral, returns `⊢ a ≠ 0`. -/
meta def prove_ne_zero' (c : instance_cache) : expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| a :=
match match_neg a with
| some a := do (c, p) ← prove_ne_zero' a, c.mk_app ``ne_zero_neg [a, p]
| none := do (c, p) ← prove_pos c a, c.mk_app ``ne_zero_of_pos [a, p]
end
theorem clear_denom_div {α} [division_ring α] (a b b' c d : α)
(h₀ : b ≠ 0) (h₁ : b * b' = d) (h₂ : a * b' = c) : (a / b) * d = c :=
by rwa [← h₁, ← mul_assoc, div_mul_cancel _ h₀]
/-- Given `a` nonnegative rational and `d` a natural number, returns `(b, ⊢ a * d = b)`.
(`d` should be a multiple of the denominator of `a`, so that `b` is a natural number.) -/
meta def prove_clear_denom'
(prove_ne_zero : instance_cache → expr → ℚ → tactic (instance_cache × expr))
(c : instance_cache) (a d : expr) (na : ℚ) (nd : ℕ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
if na.denom = 1 then
prove_mul_nat c a d
else do
[_, _, a, b] ← return a.get_app_args,
(c, b') ← c.of_nat (nd / na.denom),
(c, p₀) ← prove_ne_zero c b (rat.of_int na.denom),
(c, _, p₁) ← prove_mul_nat c b b',
(c, r, p₂) ← prove_mul_nat c a b',
(c, p) ← c.mk_app ``clear_denom_div [a, b, b', r, d, p₀, p₁, p₂],
return (c, r, p)
theorem nonneg_pos {α} [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] (a : α) : 0 < a → 0 ≤ a := le_of_lt
theorem lt_one_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : 1 ≤ a) : 1 < bit0 a :=
lt_of_lt_of_le one_lt_two (bit0_le_bit0.2 h)
theorem lt_one_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : 0 < a) : 1 < bit1 a :=
one_lt_bit1.2 h
theorem lt_bit0_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) : a < b → bit0 a < bit0 b :=
bit0_lt_bit0.2
theorem lt_bit0_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a ≤ b) : bit0 a < bit1 b :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (bit0_le_bit0.2 h) (lt_add_one _)
theorem lt_bit1_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 ≤ b) : bit1 a < bit0 b :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by simp [bit0, bit1, zero_lt_one, add_assoc]) (bit0_le_bit0.2 h)
theorem lt_bit1_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) : a < b → bit1 a < bit1 b :=
bit1_lt_bit1.2
theorem le_one_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : 1 ≤ a) : 1 ≤ bit0 a :=
le_of_lt (lt_one_bit0 _ h)
-- deliberately strong hypothesis because bit1 0 is not a numeral
theorem le_one_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : 0 < a) : 1 ≤ bit1 a :=
le_of_lt (lt_one_bit1 _ h)
theorem le_bit0_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) : a ≤ b → bit0 a ≤ bit0 b :=
bit0_le_bit0.2
theorem le_bit0_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a ≤ b) : bit0 a ≤ bit1 b :=
le_of_lt (lt_bit0_bit1 _ _ h)
theorem le_bit1_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 ≤ b) : bit1 a ≤ bit0 b :=
le_of_lt (lt_bit1_bit0 _ _ h)
theorem le_bit1_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) : a ≤ b → bit1 a ≤ bit1 b :=
bit1_le_bit1.2
theorem sle_one_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) : 1 ≤ a → 1 + 1 ≤ bit0 a :=
bit0_le_bit0.2
theorem sle_one_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) : 1 ≤ a → 1 + 1 ≤ bit1 a :=
le_bit0_bit1 _ _
theorem sle_bit0_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) : a + 1 ≤ b → bit0 a + 1 ≤ bit0 b :=
le_bit1_bit0 _ _
theorem sle_bit0_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a ≤ b) : bit0 a + 1 ≤ bit1 b :=
bit1_le_bit1.2 h
theorem sle_bit1_bit0 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 ≤ b) :
bit1 a + 1 ≤ bit0 b :=
(bit1_succ a _ rfl).symm ▸ bit0_le_bit0.2 h
theorem sle_bit1_bit1 {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a b : α) (h : a + 1 ≤ b) :
bit1 a + 1 ≤ bit1 b :=
(bit1_succ a _ rfl).symm ▸ le_bit0_bit1 _ _ h
/-- Given `a` a rational numeral, returns `⊢ 0 ≤ a`. -/
meta def prove_nonneg (ic : instance_cache) : expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| e@`(has_zero.zero) := ic.mk_app ``le_refl [e]
| e :=
if ic.α = `(ℕ) then
return (ic, `(nat.zero_le).mk_app [e])
else do
(ic, p) ← prove_pos ic e,
ic.mk_app ``nonneg_pos [e, p]
section
open match_numeral_result
/-- Given `a` a rational numeral, returns `⊢ 1 ≤ a`. -/
meta def prove_one_le_nat (ic : instance_cache) : expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| a :=
match match_numeral a with
| one := ic.mk_app ``le_refl [a]
| bit0 a := do (ic, p) ← prove_one_le_nat a, ic.mk_app ``le_one_bit0 [a, p]
| bit1 a := do (ic, p) ← prove_pos_nat ic a, ic.mk_app ``le_one_bit1 [a, p]
| _ := failed
end
meta mutual def prove_le_nat, prove_sle_nat (ic : instance_cache)
with prove_le_nat : expr → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| a b :=
if a = b then ic.mk_app ``le_refl [a] else
match match_numeral a, match_numeral b with
| zero, _ := prove_nonneg ic b
| one, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_one_le_nat ic b, ic.mk_app ``le_one_bit0 [b, p]
| one, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_pos_nat ic b, ic.mk_app ``le_one_bit1 [b, p]
| bit0 a, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_le_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``le_bit0_bit0 [a, b, p]
| bit0 a, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_le_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``le_bit0_bit1 [a, b, p]
| bit1 a, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_sle_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``le_bit1_bit0 [a, b, p]
| bit1 a, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_le_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``le_bit1_bit1 [a, b, p]
| _, _ := failed
end
with prove_sle_nat : expr → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| a b :=
match match_numeral a, match_numeral b with
| zero, _ := prove_nonneg ic b
| one, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_one_le_nat ic b, ic.mk_app ``sle_one_bit0 [b, p]
| one, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_one_le_nat ic b, ic.mk_app ``sle_one_bit1 [b, p]
| bit0 a, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_sle_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``sle_bit0_bit0 [a, b, p]
| bit0 a, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_le_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``sle_bit0_bit1 [a, b, p]
| bit1 a, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_sle_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``sle_bit1_bit0 [a, b, p]
| bit1 a, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_sle_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``sle_bit1_bit1 [a, b, p]
| _, _ := failed
end
/-- Given `a`,`b` natural numerals, proves `⊢ a ≤ b`. -/
add_decl_doc prove_le_nat
/-- Given `a`,`b` natural numerals, proves `⊢ a + 1 ≤ b`. -/
add_decl_doc prove_sle_nat
/-- Given `a`,`b` natural numerals, proves `⊢ a < b`. -/
meta def prove_lt_nat (ic : instance_cache) : expr → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| a b :=
match match_numeral a, match_numeral b with
| zero, _ := prove_pos ic b
| one, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_one_le_nat ic b, ic.mk_app ``lt_one_bit0 [b, p]
| one, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_pos_nat ic b, ic.mk_app ``lt_one_bit1 [b, p]
| bit0 a, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_lt_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``lt_bit0_bit0 [a, b, p]
| bit0 a, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_le_nat ic a b, ic.mk_app ``lt_bit0_bit1 [a, b, p]
| bit1 a, bit0 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_sle_nat ic a b, ic.mk_app ``lt_bit1_bit0 [a, b, p]
| bit1 a, bit1 b := do (ic, p) ← prove_lt_nat a b, ic.mk_app ``lt_bit1_bit1 [a, b, p]
| _, _ := failed
end
end
theorem clear_denom_lt {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a a' b b' d : α)
(h₀ : 0 < d) (ha : a * d = a') (hb : b * d = b') (h : a' < b') : a < b :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right (by rwa [ha, hb]) (le_of_lt h₀)
/-- Given `a`,`b` nonnegative rational numerals, proves `⊢ a < b`. -/
meta def prove_lt_nonneg_rat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) (na nb : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
if na.denom = 1 ∧ nb.denom = 1 then
prove_lt_nat ic a b
else do
let nd := na.denom.lcm nb.denom,
(ic, d) ← ic.of_nat nd,
(ic, p₀) ← prove_pos ic d,
(ic, a', pa) ← prove_clear_denom' (λ ic e _, prove_ne_zero' ic e) ic a d na nd,
(ic, b', pb) ← prove_clear_denom' (λ ic e _, prove_ne_zero' ic e) ic b d nb nd,
(ic, p) ← prove_lt_nat ic a' b',
ic.mk_app ``clear_denom_lt [a, a', b, b', d, p₀, pa, pb, p]
lemma lt_neg_pos {α} [ordered_add_comm_group α] (a b : α) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : -a < b :=
lt_trans (neg_neg_of_pos ha) hb
/-- Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, proves `⊢ a < b`. -/
meta def prove_lt_rat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) (na nb : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
match match_sign a, match_sign b with
| sum.inl a, sum.inl b := do
-- we have to switch the order of `a` and `b` because `a < b ↔ -b < -a`
(ic, p) ← prove_lt_nonneg_rat ic b a (-nb) (-na),
ic.mk_app ``neg_lt_neg [b, a, p]
| sum.inl a, sum.inr ff := do
(ic, p) ← prove_pos ic a,
ic.mk_app ``neg_neg_of_pos [a, p]
| sum.inl a, sum.inr tt := do
(ic, pa) ← prove_pos ic a,
(ic, pb) ← prove_pos ic b,
ic.mk_app ``lt_neg_pos [a, b, pa, pb]
| sum.inr ff, _ := prove_pos ic b
| sum.inr tt, _ := prove_lt_nonneg_rat ic a b na nb
end
theorem clear_denom_le {α} [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a a' b b' d : α)
(h₀ : 0 < d) (ha : a * d = a') (hb : b * d = b') (h : a' ≤ b') : a ≤ b :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right (by rwa [ha, hb]) h₀
/-- Given `a`,`b` nonnegative rational numerals, proves `⊢ a ≤ b`. -/
meta def prove_le_nonneg_rat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) (na nb : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
if na.denom = 1 ∧ nb.denom = 1 then
prove_le_nat ic a b
else do
let nd := na.denom.lcm nb.denom,
(ic, d) ← ic.of_nat nd,
(ic, p₀) ← prove_pos ic d,
(ic, a', pa) ← prove_clear_denom' (λ ic e _, prove_ne_zero' ic e) ic a d na nd,
(ic, b', pb) ← prove_clear_denom' (λ ic e _, prove_ne_zero' ic e) ic b d nb nd,
(ic, p) ← prove_le_nat ic a' b',
ic.mk_app ``clear_denom_le [a, a', b, b', d, p₀, pa, pb, p]
lemma le_neg_pos {α} [ordered_add_comm_group α] (a b : α) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -a ≤ b :=
le_trans (neg_nonpos_of_nonneg ha) hb
/-- Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, proves `⊢ a ≤ b`. -/
meta def prove_le_rat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) (na nb : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
match match_sign a, match_sign b with
| sum.inl a, sum.inl b := do
(ic, p) ← prove_le_nonneg_rat ic a b (-na) (-nb),
ic.mk_app ``neg_le_neg [a, b, p]
| sum.inl a, sum.inr ff := do
(ic, p) ← prove_nonneg ic a,
ic.mk_app ``neg_nonpos_of_nonneg [a, p]
| sum.inl a, sum.inr tt := do
(ic, pa) ← prove_nonneg ic a,
(ic, pb) ← prove_nonneg ic b,
ic.mk_app ``le_neg_pos [a, b, pa, pb]
| sum.inr ff, _ := prove_nonneg ic b
| sum.inr tt, _ := prove_le_nonneg_rat ic a b na nb
end
/-- Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, proves `⊢ a ≠ b`. This version tries to prove
`⊢ a < b` or `⊢ b < a`, and so is not appropriate for types without an order relation. -/
meta def prove_ne_rat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) (na nb : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
if na < nb then do
(ic, p) ← prove_lt_rat ic a b na nb,
ic.mk_app ``ne_of_lt [a, b, p]
else do
(ic, p) ← prove_lt_rat ic b a nb na,
ic.mk_app ``ne_of_gt [a, b, p]
theorem nat_cast_zero {α} [semiring α] : ↑(0 : ℕ) = (0 : α) := nat.cast_zero
theorem nat_cast_one {α} [semiring α] : ↑(1 : ℕ) = (1 : α) := nat.cast_one
theorem nat_cast_bit0 {α} [semiring α] (a : ℕ) (a' : α) (h : ↑a = a') : ↑(bit0 a) = bit0 a' :=
h ▸ nat.cast_bit0 _
theorem nat_cast_bit1 {α} [semiring α] (a : ℕ) (a' : α) (h : ↑a = a') : ↑(bit1 a) = bit1 a' :=
h ▸ nat.cast_bit1 _
theorem int_cast_zero {α} [ring α] : ↑(0 : ℤ) = (0 : α) := int.cast_zero
theorem int_cast_one {α} [ring α] : ↑(1 : ℤ) = (1 : α) := int.cast_one
theorem int_cast_bit0 {α} [ring α] (a : ℤ) (a' : α) (h : ↑a = a') : ↑(bit0 a) = bit0 a' :=
h ▸ int.cast_bit0 _
theorem int_cast_bit1 {α} [ring α] (a : ℤ) (a' : α) (h : ↑a = a') : ↑(bit1 a) = bit1 a' :=
h ▸ int.cast_bit1 _
theorem rat_cast_bit0 {α} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] (a : ℚ) (a' : α) (h : ↑a = a') :
↑(bit0 a) = bit0 a' :=
h ▸ rat.cast_bit0 _
theorem rat_cast_bit1 {α} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] (a : ℚ) (a' : α) (h : ↑a = a') :
↑(bit1 a) = bit1 a' :=
h ▸ rat.cast_bit1 _
/-- Given `a' : α` a natural numeral, returns `(a : ℕ, ⊢ ↑a = a')`.
(Note that the returned value is on the left of the equality.) -/
meta def prove_nat_uncast (ic nc : instance_cache) : ∀ (a' : expr),
tactic (instance_cache × instance_cache × expr × expr)
| a' :=
match match_numeral a' with
| match_numeral_result.zero := do
(nc, e) ← nc.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``nat_cast_zero [],
return (ic, nc, e, p)
| match_numeral_result.one := do
(nc, e) ← nc.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``nat_cast_one [],
return (ic, nc, e, p)
| match_numeral_result.bit0 a' := do
(ic, nc, a, p) ← prove_nat_uncast a',
(nc, a0) ← nc.mk_bit0 a,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``nat_cast_bit0 [a, a', p],
return (ic, nc, a0, p)
| match_numeral_result.bit1 a' := do
(ic, nc, a, p) ← prove_nat_uncast a',
(nc, a1) ← nc.mk_bit1 a,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``nat_cast_bit1 [a, a', p],
return (ic, nc, a1, p)
| _ := failed
end
/-- Given `a' : α` a natural numeral, returns `(a : ℤ, ⊢ ↑a = a')`.
(Note that the returned value is on the left of the equality.) -/
meta def prove_int_uncast_nat (ic zc : instance_cache) : ∀ (a' : expr),
tactic (instance_cache × instance_cache × expr × expr)
| a' :=
match match_numeral a' with
| match_numeral_result.zero := do
(zc, e) ← zc.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``int_cast_zero [],
return (ic, zc, e, p)
| match_numeral_result.one := do
(zc, e) ← zc.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``int_cast_one [],
return (ic, zc, e, p)
| match_numeral_result.bit0 a' := do
(ic, zc, a, p) ← prove_int_uncast_nat a',
(zc, a0) ← zc.mk_bit0 a,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``int_cast_bit0 [a, a', p],
return (ic, zc, a0, p)
| match_numeral_result.bit1 a' := do
(ic, zc, a, p) ← prove_int_uncast_nat a',
(zc, a1) ← zc.mk_bit1 a,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``int_cast_bit1 [a, a', p],
return (ic, zc, a1, p)
| _ := failed
end
/-- Given `a' : α` a natural numeral, returns `(a : ℚ, ⊢ ↑a = a')`.
(Note that the returned value is on the left of the equality.) -/
meta def prove_rat_uncast_nat (ic qc : instance_cache) (cz_inst : expr) : ∀ (a' : expr),
tactic (instance_cache × instance_cache × expr × expr)
| a' :=
match match_numeral a' with
| match_numeral_result.zero := do
(qc, e) ← qc.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``rat.cast_zero [],
return (ic, qc, e, p)
| match_numeral_result.one := do
(qc, e) ← qc.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``rat.cast_one [],
return (ic, qc, e, p)
| match_numeral_result.bit0 a' := do
(ic, qc, a, p) ← prove_rat_uncast_nat a',
(qc, a0) ← qc.mk_bit0 a,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``rat_cast_bit0 [cz_inst, a, a', p],
return (ic, qc, a0, p)
| match_numeral_result.bit1 a' := do
(ic, qc, a, p) ← prove_rat_uncast_nat a',
(qc, a1) ← qc.mk_bit1 a,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``rat_cast_bit1 [cz_inst, a, a', p],
return (ic, qc, a1, p)
| _ := failed
end
theorem rat_cast_div {α} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] (a b : ℚ) (a' b' : α)
(ha : ↑a = a') (hb : ↑b = b') : ↑(a / b) = a' / b' :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ rat.cast_div _ _
/-- Given `a' : α` a nonnegative rational numeral, returns `(a : ℚ, ⊢ ↑a = a')`.
(Note that the returned value is on the left of the equality.) -/
meta def prove_rat_uncast_nonneg (ic qc : instance_cache) (cz_inst a' : expr) (na' : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
if na'.denom = 1 then
prove_rat_uncast_nat ic qc cz_inst a'
else do
[_, _, a', b'] ← return a'.get_app_args,
(ic, qc, a, pa) ← prove_rat_uncast_nat ic qc cz_inst a',
(ic, qc, b, pb) ← prove_rat_uncast_nat ic qc cz_inst b',
(qc, e) ← qc.mk_app ``has_div.div [a, b],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``rat_cast_div [cz_inst, a, b, a', b', pa, pb],
return (ic, qc, e, p)
theorem int_cast_neg {α} [ring α] (a : ℤ) (a' : α) (h : ↑a = a') : ↑-a = -a' :=
h ▸ int.cast_neg _
theorem rat_cast_neg {α} [division_ring α] (a : ℚ) (a' : α) (h : ↑a = a') : ↑-a = -a' :=
h ▸ rat.cast_neg _
/-- Given `a' : α` an integer numeral, returns `(a : ℤ, ⊢ ↑a = a')`.
(Note that the returned value is on the left of the equality.) -/
meta def prove_int_uncast (ic zc : instance_cache) (a' : expr) :
tactic (instance_cache × instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
match match_neg a' with
| some a' := do
(ic, zc, a, p) ← prove_int_uncast_nat ic zc a',
(zc, e) ← zc.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [a],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``int_cast_neg [a, a', p],
return (ic, zc, e, p)
| none := prove_int_uncast_nat ic zc a'
end
/-- Given `a' : α` a rational numeral, returns `(a : ℚ, ⊢ ↑a = a')`.
(Note that the returned value is on the left of the equality.) -/
meta def prove_rat_uncast (ic qc : instance_cache) (cz_inst a' : expr) (na' : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
match match_neg a' with
| some a' := do
(ic, qc, a, p) ← prove_rat_uncast_nonneg ic qc cz_inst a' (-na'),
(qc, e) ← qc.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [a],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``rat_cast_neg [a, a', p],
return (ic, qc, e, p)
| none := prove_rat_uncast_nonneg ic qc cz_inst a' na'
end
theorem nat_cast_ne {α} [semiring α] [char_zero α] (a b : ℕ) (a' b' : α)
(ha : ↑a = a') (hb : ↑b = b') (h : a ≠ b) : a' ≠ b' :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ mt nat.cast_inj.1 h
theorem int_cast_ne {α} [ring α] [char_zero α] (a b : ℤ) (a' b' : α)
(ha : ↑a = a') (hb : ↑b = b') (h : a ≠ b) : a' ≠ b' :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ mt int.cast_inj.1 h
theorem rat_cast_ne {α} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] (a b : ℚ) (a' b' : α)
(ha : ↑a = a') (hb : ↑b = b') (h : a ≠ b) : a' ≠ b' :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ mt rat.cast_inj.1 h
/-- Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, proves `⊢ a ≠ b`. Currently it tries two methods:
* Prove `⊢ a < b` or `⊢ b < a`, if the base type has an order
* Embed `↑(a':ℚ) = a` and `↑(b':ℚ) = b`, and then prove `a' ≠ b'`.
This requires that the base type be `char_zero`, and also that it be a `division_ring`
so that the coercion from `ℚ` is well defined.
We may also add coercions to `ℤ` and `ℕ` as well in order to support `char_zero`
rings and semirings. -/
meta def prove_ne : instance_cache → expr → expr → ℚ → ℚ → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| ic a b na nb := prove_ne_rat ic a b na nb <|> do
cz_inst ← mk_mapp ``char_zero [ic.α, none, none] >>= mk_instance,
if na.denom = 1 ∧ nb.denom = 1 then
if na ≥ 0 ∧ nb ≥ 0 then do
guard (ic.α ≠ `(ℕ)),
nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
(ic, nc, a', pa) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc a,
(ic, nc, b', pb) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc b,
(nc, p) ← prove_ne_rat nc a' b' na nb,
ic.mk_app ``nat_cast_ne [cz_inst, a', b', a, b, pa, pb, p]
else do
guard (ic.α ≠ `(ℤ)),
zc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℤ),
(ic, zc, a', pa) ← prove_int_uncast ic zc a,
(ic, zc, b', pb) ← prove_int_uncast ic zc b,
(zc, p) ← prove_ne_rat zc a' b' na nb,
ic.mk_app ``int_cast_ne [cz_inst, a', b', a, b, pa, pb, p]
else do
guard (ic.α ≠ `(ℚ)),
qc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℚ),
(ic, qc, a', pa) ← prove_rat_uncast ic qc cz_inst a na,
(ic, qc, b', pb) ← prove_rat_uncast ic qc cz_inst b nb,
(qc, p) ← prove_ne_rat qc a' b' na nb,
ic.mk_app ``rat_cast_ne [cz_inst, a', b', a, b, pa, pb, p]
/-- Given `a` a rational numeral, returns `⊢ a ≠ 0`. -/
meta def prove_ne_zero (ic : instance_cache) : expr → ℚ → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| a na := do
(ic, z) ← ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
prove_ne ic a z na 0
/-- Given `a` nonnegative rational and `d` a natural number, returns `(b, ⊢ a * d = b)`.
(`d` should be a multiple of the denominator of `a`, so that `b` is a natural number.) -/
meta def prove_clear_denom : instance_cache → expr → expr → ℚ → ℕ →
tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) := prove_clear_denom' prove_ne_zero
theorem clear_denom_add {α} [division_ring α] (a a' b b' c c' d : α)
(h₀ : d ≠ 0) (ha : a * d = a') (hb : b * d = b') (hc : c * d = c')
(h : a' + b' = c') : a + b = c :=
mul_right_cancel₀ h₀ $ by rwa [add_mul, ha, hb, hc]
/-- Given `a`,`b`,`c` nonnegative rational numerals, returns `⊢ a + b = c`. -/
meta def prove_add_nonneg_rat (ic : instance_cache) (a b c : expr) (na nb nc : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
if na.denom = 1 ∧ nb.denom = 1 then
prove_add_nat ic a b c
else do
let nd := na.denom.lcm nb.denom,
(ic, d) ← ic.of_nat nd,
(ic, p₀) ← prove_ne_zero ic d (rat.of_int nd),
(ic, a', pa) ← prove_clear_denom ic a d na nd,
(ic, b', pb) ← prove_clear_denom ic b d nb nd,
(ic, c', pc) ← prove_clear_denom ic c d nc nd,
(ic, p) ← prove_add_nat ic a' b' c',
ic.mk_app ``clear_denom_add [a, a', b, b', c, c', d, p₀, pa, pb, pc, p]
theorem add_pos_neg_pos {α} [add_group α] (a b c : α) (h : c + b = a) : a + -b = c :=
h ▸ by simp
theorem add_pos_neg_neg {α} [add_group α] (a b c : α) (h : c + a = b) : a + -b = -c :=
h ▸ by simp
theorem add_neg_pos_pos {α} [add_group α] (a b c : α) (h : a + c = b) : -a + b = c :=
h ▸ by simp
theorem add_neg_pos_neg {α} [add_group α] (a b c : α) (h : b + c = a) : -a + b = -c :=
h ▸ by simp
theorem add_neg_neg {α} [add_group α] (a b c : α) (h : b + a = c) : -a + -b = -c :=
h ▸ by simp
/-- Given `a`,`b`,`c` rational numerals, returns `⊢ a + b = c`. -/
meta def prove_add_rat (ic : instance_cache) (ea eb ec : expr) (a b c : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
match match_neg ea, match_neg eb, match_neg ec with
| some ea, some eb, some ec := do
(ic, p) ← prove_add_nonneg_rat ic eb ea ec (-b) (-a) (-c),
ic.mk_app ``add_neg_neg [ea, eb, ec, p]
| some ea, none, some ec := do
(ic, p) ← prove_add_nonneg_rat ic eb ec ea b (-c) (-a),
ic.mk_app ``add_neg_pos_neg [ea, eb, ec, p]
| some ea, none, none := do
(ic, p) ← prove_add_nonneg_rat ic ea ec eb (-a) c b,
ic.mk_app ``add_neg_pos_pos [ea, eb, ec, p]
| none, some eb, some ec := do
(ic, p) ← prove_add_nonneg_rat ic ec ea eb (-c) a (-b),
ic.mk_app ``add_pos_neg_neg [ea, eb, ec, p]
| none, some eb, none := do
(ic, p) ← prove_add_nonneg_rat ic ec eb ea c (-b) a,
ic.mk_app ``add_pos_neg_pos [ea, eb, ec, p]
| _, _, _ := prove_add_nonneg_rat ic ea eb ec a b c
end
/-- Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, returns `(c, ⊢ a + b = c)`. -/
meta def prove_add_rat' (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
do na ← a.to_rat,
nb ← b.to_rat,
let nc := na + nb,
(ic, c) ← ic.of_rat nc,
(ic, p) ← prove_add_rat ic a b c na nb nc,
return (ic, c, p)
theorem clear_denom_simple_nat {α} [division_ring α] (a : α) :
(1:α) ≠ 0 ∧ a * 1 = a := ⟨one_ne_zero, mul_one _⟩
theorem clear_denom_simple_div {α} [division_ring α] (a b : α) (h : b ≠ 0) :
b ≠ 0 ∧ a / b * b = a := ⟨h, div_mul_cancel _ h⟩
/-- Given `a` a nonnegative rational numeral, returns `(b, c, ⊢ a * b = c)`
where `b` and `c` are natural numerals. (`b` will be the denominator of `a`.) -/
meta def prove_clear_denom_simple (c : instance_cache) (a : expr) (na : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr × expr) :=
if na.denom = 1 then do
(c, d) ← c.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
(c, p) ← c.mk_app ``clear_denom_simple_nat [a],
return (c, d, a, p)
else do
[α, _, a, b] ← return a.get_app_args,
(c, p₀) ← prove_ne_zero c b (rat.of_int na.denom),
(c, p) ← c.mk_app ``clear_denom_simple_div [a, b, p₀],
return (c, b, a, p)
theorem clear_denom_mul {α} [field α] (a a' b b' c c' d₁ d₂ d : α)
(ha : d₁ ≠ 0 ∧ a * d₁ = a') (hb : d₂ ≠ 0 ∧ b * d₂ = b')
(hc : c * d = c') (hd : d₁ * d₂ = d)
(h : a' * b' = c') : a * b = c :=
mul_right_cancel₀ ha.1 $ mul_right_cancel₀ hb.1 $
by rw [mul_assoc c, hd, hc, ← h, ← ha.2, ← hb.2, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm a]
/-- Given `a`,`b` nonnegative rational numerals, returns `(c, ⊢ a * b = c)`. -/
meta def prove_mul_nonneg_rat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) (na nb : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
if na.denom = 1 ∧ nb.denom = 1 then
prove_mul_nat ic a b
else do
let nc := na * nb, (ic, c) ← ic.of_rat nc,
(ic, d₁, a', pa) ← prove_clear_denom_simple ic a na,
(ic, d₂, b', pb) ← prove_clear_denom_simple ic b nb,
(ic, d, pd) ← prove_mul_nat ic d₁ d₂, nd ← d.to_nat,
(ic, c', pc) ← prove_clear_denom ic c d nc nd,
(ic, _, p) ← prove_mul_nat ic a' b',
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``clear_denom_mul [a, a', b, b', c, c', d₁, d₂, d, pa, pb, pc, pd, p],
return (ic, c, p)
theorem mul_neg_pos {α} [ring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) : -a * b = -c := h ▸ by simp
theorem mul_pos_neg {α} [ring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) : a * -b = -c := h ▸ by simp
theorem mul_neg_neg {α} [ring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) : -a * -b = c := h ▸ by simp
/-- Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, returns `(c, ⊢ a * b = c)`. -/
meta def prove_mul_rat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) (na nb : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
match match_sign a, match_sign b with
| sum.inl a, sum.inl b := do
(ic, c, p) ← prove_mul_nonneg_rat ic a b (-na) (-nb),
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_neg_neg [a, b, c, p],
return (ic, c, p)
| sum.inr ff, _ := do
(ic, z) ← ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``zero_mul [b],
return (ic, z, p)
| _, sum.inr ff := do
(ic, z) ← ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_zero [a],
return (ic, z, p)
| sum.inl a, sum.inr tt := do
(ic, c, p) ← prove_mul_nonneg_rat ic a b (-na) nb,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_neg_pos [a, b, c, p],
(ic, c') ← ic.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [c],
return (ic, c', p)
| sum.inr tt, sum.inl b := do
(ic, c, p) ← prove_mul_nonneg_rat ic a b na (-nb),
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``mul_pos_neg [a, b, c, p],
(ic, c') ← ic.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [c],
return (ic, c', p)
| sum.inr tt, sum.inr tt := prove_mul_nonneg_rat ic a b na nb
end
theorem inv_neg {α} [division_ring α] (a b : α) (h : a⁻¹ = b) : (-a)⁻¹ = -b :=
h ▸ by simp only [inv_eq_one_div, one_div_neg_eq_neg_one_div]
theorem inv_one {α} [division_ring α] : (1 : α)⁻¹ = 1 := inv_one
theorem inv_one_div {α} [division_ring α] (a : α) : (1 / a)⁻¹ = a :=
by rw [one_div, inv_inv₀]
theorem inv_div_one {α} [division_ring α] (a : α) : a⁻¹ = 1 / a :=
inv_eq_one_div _
theorem inv_div {α} [division_ring α] (a b : α) : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a :=
by simp only [inv_eq_one_div, one_div_div]
/-- Given `a` a rational numeral, returns `(b, ⊢ a⁻¹ = b)`. -/
meta def prove_inv : instance_cache → expr → ℚ → tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
| ic e n :=
match match_sign e with
| sum.inl e := do
(ic, e', p) ← prove_inv ic e (-n),
(ic, r) ← ic.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [e'],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``inv_neg [e, e', p],
return (ic, r, p)
| sum.inr ff := do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``inv_zero [],
return (ic, e, p)
| sum.inr tt :=
if n.num = 1 then
if n.denom = 1 then do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``inv_one [],
return (ic, e, p)
else do
let e := e.app_arg,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``inv_one_div [e],
return (ic, e, p)
else if n.denom = 1 then do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``inv_div_one [e],
e ← infer_type p,
return (ic, e.app_arg, p)
else do
[_, _, a, b] ← return e.get_app_args,
(ic, e') ← ic.mk_app ``has_div.div [b, a],
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``inv_div [a, b],
return (ic, e', p)
end
theorem div_eq {α} [division_ring α] (a b b' c : α)
(hb : b⁻¹ = b') (h : a * b' = c) : a / b = c :=
by rwa [ ← hb, ← div_eq_mul_inv] at h
/-- Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, returns `(c, ⊢ a / b = c)`. -/
meta def prove_div (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) (na nb : ℚ) :
tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
do (ic, b', pb) ← prove_inv ic b nb,
(ic, c, p) ← prove_mul_rat ic a b' na nb⁻¹,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``div_eq [a, b, b', c, pb, p],
return (ic, c, p)
/-- Given `a` a rational numeral, returns `(b, ⊢ -a = b)`. -/
meta def prove_neg (ic : instance_cache) (a : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
match match_sign a with
| sum.inl a := do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``neg_neg [a],
return (ic, a, p)
| sum.inr ff := do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``neg_zero [],
return (ic, a, p)
| sum.inr tt := do
(ic, a') ← ic.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [a],
p ← mk_eq_refl a',
return (ic, a', p)
end
theorem sub_pos {α} [add_group α] (a b b' c : α) (hb : -b = b') (h : a + b' = c) : a - b = c :=
by rwa [← hb, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at h
theorem sub_neg {α} [add_group α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b = c) : a - -b = c :=
by rwa sub_neg_eq_add
/-- Given `a`,`b` rational numerals, returns `(c, ⊢ a - b = c)`. -/
meta def prove_sub (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr) :=
match match_sign b with
| sum.inl b := do
(ic, c, p) ← prove_add_rat' ic a b,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``sub_neg [a, b, c, p],
return (ic, c, p)
| sum.inr ff := do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``sub_zero [a],
return (ic, a, p)
| sum.inr tt := do
(ic, b', pb) ← prove_neg ic b,
(ic, c, p) ← prove_add_rat' ic a b',
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``sub_pos [a, b, b', c, pb, p],
return (ic, c, p)
end
theorem sub_nat_pos (a b c : ℕ) (h : b + c = a) : a - b = c :=
h ▸ add_tsub_cancel_left _ _
theorem sub_nat_neg (a b c : ℕ) (h : a + c = b) : a - b = 0 :=
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr $ h ▸ nat.le_add_right _ _
/-- Given `a : nat`,`b : nat` natural numerals, returns `(c, ⊢ a - b = c)`. -/
meta def prove_sub_nat (ic : instance_cache) (a b : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do na ← a.to_nat, nb ← b.to_nat,
if nb ≤ na then do
(ic, c) ← ic.of_nat (na - nb),
(ic, p) ← prove_add_nat ic b c a,
return (c, `(sub_nat_pos).mk_app [a, b, c, p])
else do
(ic, c) ← ic.of_nat (nb - na),
(ic, p) ← prove_add_nat ic a c b,
return (`(0 : ℕ), `(sub_nat_neg).mk_app [a, b, c, p])
/-- Evaluates the basic field operations `+`,`neg`,`-`,`*`,`inv`,`/` on numerals.
Also handles nat subtraction. Does not do recursive simplification; that is,
`1 + 1 + 1` will not simplify but `2 + 1` will. This is handled by the top level
`simp` call in `norm_num.derive`. -/
meta def eval_field : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(%%e₁ + %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
let n₃ := n₁ + n₂,
(c, e₃) ← c.of_rat n₃,
(_, p) ← prove_add_rat c e₁ e₂ e₃ n₁ n₂ n₃,
return (e₃, p)
| `(%%e₁ * %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
prod.snd <$> prove_mul_rat c e₁ e₂ n₁ n₂
| `(- %%e) := do
c ← infer_type e >>= mk_instance_cache,
prod.snd <$> prove_neg c e
| `(@has_sub.sub %%α %%inst %%a %%b) := do
c ← mk_instance_cache α,
if α = `(nat) then prove_sub_nat c a b
else prod.snd <$> prove_sub c a b
| `(has_inv.inv %%e) := do
n ← e.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e >>= mk_instance_cache,
prod.snd <$> prove_inv c e n
| `(%%e₁ / %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
prod.snd <$> prove_div c e₁ e₂ n₁ n₂
| _ := failed
lemma pow_bit0 [monoid α] (a c' c : α) (b : ℕ)
(h : a ^ b = c') (h₂ : c' * c' = c) : a ^ bit0 b = c :=
h₂ ▸ by simp [pow_bit0, h]
lemma pow_bit1 [monoid α] (a c₁ c₂ c : α) (b : ℕ)
(h : a ^ b = c₁) (h₂ : c₁ * c₁ = c₂) (h₃ : c₂ * a = c) : a ^ bit1 b = c :=
by rw [← h₃, ← h₂]; simp [pow_bit1, h]
section
open match_numeral_result
/-- Given `a` a rational numeral and `b : nat`, returns `(c, ⊢ a ^ b = c)`. -/
meta def prove_pow (a : expr) (na : ℚ) :
instance_cache → expr → tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
| ic b :=
match match_numeral b with
| zero := do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``pow_zero [a],
(ic, o) ← ic.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
return (ic, o, p)
| one := do
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``pow_one [a],
return (ic, a, p)
| bit0 b := do
(ic, c', p) ← prove_pow ic b,
nc' ← expr.to_rat c',
(ic, c, p₂) ← prove_mul_rat ic c' c' nc' nc',
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``pow_bit0 [a, c', c, b, p, p₂],
return (ic, c, p)
| bit1 b := do
(ic, c₁, p) ← prove_pow ic b,
nc₁ ← expr.to_rat c₁,
(ic, c₂, p₂) ← prove_mul_rat ic c₁ c₁ nc₁ nc₁,
(ic, c, p₃) ← prove_mul_rat ic c₂ a (nc₁ * nc₁) na,
(ic, p) ← ic.mk_app ``pow_bit1 [a, c₁, c₂, c, b, p, p₂, p₃],
return (ic, c, p)
| _ := failed
end
end
/-- Evaluates expressions of the form `a ^ b`, `monoid.npow a b` or `nat.pow a b`. -/
meta def eval_pow : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(@has_pow.pow %%α _ %%m %%e₁ %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
match m with
| `(@monoid.has_pow %%_ %%_) := prod.snd <$> prove_pow e₁ n₁ c e₂
| _ := failed
end
| `(monoid.npow %%e₁ %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
prod.snd <$> prove_pow e₁ n₁ c e₂
| _ := failed
/-- Given `⊢ p`, returns `(true, ⊢ p = true)`. -/
meta def true_intro (p : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
prod.mk `(true) <$> mk_app ``eq_true_intro [p]
/-- Given `⊢ ¬ p`, returns `(false, ⊢ p = false)`. -/
meta def false_intro (p : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
prod.mk `(false) <$> mk_app ``eq_false_intro [p]
theorem not_refl_false_intro {α} (a : α) : (a ≠ a) = false :=
eq_false_intro $ not_not_intro rfl
/-- Evaluates the inequality operations `=`,`<`,`>`,`≤`,`≥`,`≠` on numerals. -/
meta def eval_ineq : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(%%e₁ < %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
if n₁ < n₂ then
do (_, p) ← prove_lt_rat c e₁ e₂ n₁ n₂, true_intro p
else if n₁ = n₂ then do
(_, p) ← c.mk_app ``lt_irrefl [e₁],
false_intro p
else do
(c, p') ← prove_lt_rat c e₂ e₁ n₂ n₁,
(_, p) ← c.mk_app ``not_lt_of_gt [e₁, e₂, p'],
false_intro p
| `(%%e₁ ≤ %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
if n₁ ≤ n₂ then do
(_, p) ←
if n₁ = n₂ then c.mk_app ``le_refl [e₁]
else prove_le_rat c e₁ e₂ n₁ n₂,
true_intro p
else do
(c, p) ← prove_lt_rat c e₂ e₁ n₂ n₁,
(_, p) ← c.mk_app ``not_le_of_gt [e₁, e₂, p],
false_intro p
| `(%%e₁ = %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
if n₁ = n₂ then mk_eq_refl e₁ >>= true_intro
else do (_, p) ← prove_ne c e₁ e₂ n₁ n₂, false_intro p
| `(%%e₁ > %%e₂) := mk_app ``has_lt.lt [e₂, e₁] >>= eval_ineq
| `(%%e₁ ≥ %%e₂) := mk_app ``has_le.le [e₂, e₁] >>= eval_ineq
| `(%%e₁ ≠ %%e₂) := do
n₁ ← e₁.to_rat, n₂ ← e₂.to_rat,
c ← infer_type e₁ >>= mk_instance_cache,
if n₁ = n₂ then
prod.mk `(false) <$> mk_app ``not_refl_false_intro [e₁]
else do (_, p) ← prove_ne c e₁ e₂ n₁ n₂, true_intro p
| _ := failed
theorem nat_succ_eq (a b c : ℕ) (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b + 1 = c) : nat.succ a = c := by rwa h₁
/-- Evaluates the expression `nat.succ ... (nat.succ n)` where `n` is a natural numeral.
(We could also just handle `nat.succ n` here and rely on `simp` to work bottom up, but we figure
that towers of successors coming from e.g. `induction` are a common case.) -/
meta def prove_nat_succ (ic : instance_cache) : expr → tactic (instance_cache × ℕ × expr × expr)
| `(nat.succ %%a) := do
(ic, n, b, p₁) ← prove_nat_succ a,
let n' := n + 1,
(ic, c) ← ic.of_nat n',
(ic, p₂) ← prove_add_nat ic b `(1) c,
return (ic, n', c, `(nat_succ_eq).mk_app [a, b, c, p₁, p₂])
| e := do
n ← e.to_nat,
p ← mk_eq_refl e,
return (ic, n, e, p)
lemma nat_div (a b q r m : ℕ) (hm : q * b = m) (h : r + m = a) (h₂ : r < b) : a / b = q :=
by rw [← h, ← hm, nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h₂),
nat.div_eq_of_lt h₂, zero_add]
lemma int_div (a b q r m : ℤ) (hm : q * b = m) (h : r + m = a) (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < b) :
a / b = q :=
by rw [← h, ← hm, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ h₂)),
int.div_eq_zero_of_lt h₁ h₂, zero_add]
lemma nat_mod (a b q r m : ℕ) (hm : q * b = m) (h : r + m = a) (h₂ : r < b) : a % b = r :=
by rw [← h, ← hm, nat.add_mul_mod_self_right, nat.mod_eq_of_lt h₂]
lemma int_mod (a b q r m : ℤ) (hm : q * b = m) (h : r + m = a) (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < b) :
a % b = r :=
by rw [← h, ← hm, int.add_mul_mod_self, int.mod_eq_of_lt h₁ h₂]
lemma int_div_neg (a b c' c : ℤ) (h : a / b = c') (h₂ : -c' = c) : a / -b = c :=
h₂ ▸ h ▸ int.div_neg _ _
lemma int_mod_neg (a b c : ℤ) (h : a % b = c) : a % -b = c :=
(int.mod_neg _ _).trans h
/-- Given `a`,`b` numerals in `nat` or `int`,
* `prove_div_mod ic a b ff` returns `(c, ⊢ a / b = c)`
* `prove_div_mod ic a b tt` returns `(c, ⊢ a % b = c)`
-/
meta def prove_div_mod (ic : instance_cache) :
expr → expr → bool → tactic (instance_cache × expr × expr)
| a b mod :=
match match_neg b with
| some b := do
(ic, c', p) ← prove_div_mod a b mod,
if mod then
return (ic, c', `(int_mod_neg).mk_app [a, b, c', p])
else do
(ic, c, p₂) ← prove_neg ic c',
return (ic, c, `(int_div_neg).mk_app [a, b, c', c, p, p₂])
| none := do
nb ← b.to_nat,
na ← a.to_int,
let nq := na / nb,
let nr := na % nb,
let nm := nq * nr,
(ic, q) ← ic.of_int nq,
(ic, r) ← ic.of_int nr,
(ic, m, pm) ← prove_mul_rat ic q b (rat.of_int nq) (rat.of_int nb),
(ic, p) ← prove_add_rat ic r m a (rat.of_int nr) (rat.of_int nm) (rat.of_int na),
(ic, p') ← prove_lt_nat ic r b,
if ic.α = `(nat) then
if mod then return (ic, r, `(nat_mod).mk_app [a, b, q, r, m, pm, p, p'])
else return (ic, q, `(nat_div).mk_app [a, b, q, r, m, pm, p, p'])
else if ic.α = `(int) then do
(ic, p₀) ← prove_nonneg ic r,
if mod then return (ic, r, `(int_mod).mk_app [a, b, q, r, m, pm, p, p₀, p'])
else return (ic, q, `(int_div).mk_app [a, b, q, r, m, pm, p, p₀, p'])
else failed
end
theorem dvd_eq_nat (a b c : ℕ) (p) (h₁ : b % a = c) (h₂ : (c = 0) = p) : (a ∣ b) = p :=
(propext $ by rw [← h₁, nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]).trans h₂
theorem dvd_eq_int (a b c : ℤ) (p) (h₁ : b % a = c) (h₂ : (c = 0) = p) : (a ∣ b) = p :=
(propext $ by rw [← h₁, int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]).trans h₂
theorem int_to_nat_pos (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) (h : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact b : ℤ) = a) :
a.to_nat = b := by rw ← h; simp
theorem int_to_nat_neg (a : ℤ) (h : 0 < a) : (-a).to_nat = 0 :=
by simp only [int.to_nat_of_nonpos, h.le, neg_nonpos]
theorem nat_abs_pos (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) (h : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact b : ℤ) = a) :
a.nat_abs = b := by rw ← h; simp
theorem nat_abs_neg (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) (h : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact b : ℤ) = a) :
(-a).nat_abs = b := by rw ← h; simp
theorem neg_succ_of_nat (a b : ℕ) (c : ℤ) (h₁ : a + 1 = b)
(h₂ : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact b : ℤ) = c) :
-[1+ a] = -c := by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, int.nat_cast_eq_coe_nat]; refl
/-- Evaluates some extra numeric operations on `nat` and `int`, specifically
`nat.succ`, `/` and `%`, and `∣` (divisibility). -/
meta def eval_nat_int_ext : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| e@`(nat.succ _) := do
ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
(_, _, ep) ← prove_nat_succ ic e,
return ep
| `(%%a / %%b) := do
c ← infer_type a >>= mk_instance_cache,
prod.snd <$> prove_div_mod c a b ff
| `(%%a % %%b) := do
c ← infer_type a >>= mk_instance_cache,
prod.snd <$> prove_div_mod c a b tt
| `(%%a ∣ %%b) := do
α ← infer_type a,
ic ← mk_instance_cache α,
th ← if α = `(nat) then return (`(dvd_eq_nat):expr) else
if α = `(int) then return `(dvd_eq_int) else failed,
(ic, c, p₁) ← prove_div_mod ic b a tt,
(ic, z) ← ic.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [],
(e', p₂) ← mk_app ``eq [c, z] >>= eval_ineq,
return (e', th.mk_app [a, b, c, e', p₁, p₂])
| `(int.to_nat %%a) := do
n ← a.to_int,
ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℤ),
if n ≥ 0 then do
nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
(_, _, b, p) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc a,
pure (b, `(int_to_nat_pos).mk_app [a, b, p])
else do
a ← match_neg a,
(_, p) ← prove_pos ic a,
pure (`(0), `(int_to_nat_neg).mk_app [a, p])
| `(int.nat_abs %%a) := do
n ← a.to_int,
ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℤ),
nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
if n ≥ 0 then do
(_, _, b, p) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc a,
pure (b, `(nat_abs_pos).mk_app [a, b, p])
else do
a ← match_neg a,
(_, _, b, p) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc a,
pure (b, `(nat_abs_neg).mk_app [a, b, p])
| `(int.neg_succ_of_nat %%a) := do
na ← a.to_nat,
ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℤ),
nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
let nb := na + 1,
(nc, b) ← nc.of_nat nb,
(nc, p₁) ← prove_add_nat nc a `(1) b,
(ic, c) ← ic.of_nat nb,
(_, _, _, p₂) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc c,
pure (`(-%%c : ℤ), `(neg_succ_of_nat).mk_app [a, b, c, p₁, p₂])
| _ := failed
theorem int_to_nat_cast (a : ℕ) (b : ℤ)
(h : (by haveI := @nat.cast_coe ℤ; exact a : ℤ) = b) :
↑a = b := eq.trans (by simp) h
/-- Evaluates the `↑n` cast operation from `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ` to an arbitrary type `α`. -/
meta def eval_cast : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(@coe ℕ %%α %%inst %%a) := do
if inst.is_app_of ``coe_to_lift then
if inst.app_arg.is_app_of ``nat.cast_coe then do
n ← a.to_nat,
ic ← mk_instance_cache α,
nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
(ic, b) ← ic.of_nat n,
(_, _, _, p) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc b,
pure (b, p)
else if inst.app_arg.is_app_of ``int.cast_coe then do
n ← a.to_int,
ic ← mk_instance_cache α,
zc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℤ),
(ic, b) ← ic.of_int n,
(_, _, _, p) ← prove_int_uncast ic zc b,
pure (b, p)
else if inst.app_arg.is_app_of ``int.cast_coe then do
n ← a.to_rat,
cz_inst ← mk_mapp ``char_zero [α, none, none] >>= mk_instance,
ic ← mk_instance_cache α,
qc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℚ),
(ic, b) ← ic.of_rat n,
(_, _, _, p) ← prove_rat_uncast ic qc cz_inst b n,
pure (b, p)
else failed
else if inst = `(@coe_base nat int int.has_coe) then do
n ← a.to_nat,
ic ← mk_instance_cache `(ℤ),
nc ← mk_instance_cache `(ℕ),
(ic, b) ← ic.of_nat n,
(_, _, _, p) ← prove_nat_uncast ic nc b,
pure (b, `(int_to_nat_cast).mk_app [a, b, p])
else failed
| _ := failed
/-- This version of `derive` does not fail when the input is already a numeral -/
meta def derive.step (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
eval_field e <|> eval_pow e <|> eval_ineq e <|> eval_cast e <|> eval_nat_int_ext e
/-- An attribute for adding additional extensions to `norm_num`. To use this attribute, put
`@[norm_num]` on a tactic of type `expr → tactic (expr × expr)`; the tactic will be called on
subterms by `norm_num`, and it is responsible for identifying that the expression is a numerical
function applied to numerals, for example `nat.fib 17`, and should return the reduced numerical
expression (which must be in `norm_num`-normal form: a natural or rational numeral, i.e. `37`,
`12 / 7` or `-(2 / 3)`, although this can be an expression in any type), and the proof that the
original expression is equal to the rewritten expression.
Failure is used to indicate that this tactic does not apply to the term. For performance reasons,
it is best to detect non-applicability as soon as possible so that the next tactic can have a go,
so generally it will start with a pattern match and then checking that the arguments to the term
are numerals or of the appropriate form, followed by proof construction, which should not fail.
Propositions are treated like any other term. The normal form for propositions is `true` or
`false`, so it should produce a proof of the form `p = true` or `p = false`. `eq_true_intro` can be
used to help here.
-/
@[user_attribute]
protected meta def attr : user_attribute (expr → tactic (expr × expr)) unit :=
{ name := `norm_num,
descr := "Add norm_num derivers",
cache_cfg :=
{ mk_cache := λ ns, do {
t ← ns.mfoldl
(λ (t : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) n, do
t' ← eval_expr (expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (expr.const n []),
pure (λ e, t' e <|> t e))
(λ _, failed),
pure (λ e, derive.step e <|> t e) },
dependencies := [] } }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "norm_num",
category := doc_category.attr,
decl_names := [`norm_num.attr],
tags := ["arithmetic", "decision_procedure"] }
/-- Look up the `norm_num` extensions in the cache and return a tactic extending `derive.step` with
additional reduction procedures. -/
meta def get_step : tactic (expr → tactic (expr × expr)) := norm_num.attr.get_cache
/-- Simplify an expression bottom-up using `step` to simplify the subexpressions. -/
meta def derive' (step : expr → tactic (expr × expr))
: expr → tactic (expr × expr) | e :=
do e ← instantiate_mvars e,
(_, e', pr) ←
ext_simplify_core () {} simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed) (λ _ _ _ _ _, failed)
(λ _ _ _ _ e,
do (new_e, pr) ← step e,
guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e),
return ((), new_e, some pr, tt))
`eq e,
return (e', pr)
/-- Simplify an expression bottom-up using the default `norm_num` set to simplify the
subexpressions. -/
meta def derive (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) := do f ← get_step, derive' f e
end norm_num
/-- Basic version of `norm_num` that does not call `simp`. It uses the provided `step` tactic
to simplify the expression; use `get_step` to get the default `norm_num` set and `derive.step` for
the basic builtin set of simplifications. -/
meta def tactic.norm_num1 (step : expr → tactic (expr × expr))
(loc : interactive.loc) : tactic unit :=
do ns ← loc.get_locals,
success ← tactic.replace_at (norm_num.derive' step) ns loc.include_goal,
when loc.include_goal $ try tactic.triv,
when (¬ ns.empty) $ try tactic.contradiction,
monad.unlessb success $ done <|> fail "norm_num failed to simplify"
/-- Normalize numerical expressions. It uses the provided `step` tactic to simplify the expression;
use `get_step` to get the default `norm_num` set and `derive.step` for the basic builtin set of
simplifications. -/
meta def tactic.norm_num (step : expr → tactic (expr × expr))
(hs : list simp_arg_type) (l : interactive.loc) : tactic unit :=
repeat1 $ orelse' (tactic.norm_num1 step l) $
interactive.simp_core {} (tactic.norm_num1 step (interactive.loc.ns [none]))
ff (simp_arg_type.except ``one_div :: hs) [] l >> skip
namespace tactic.interactive
open norm_num interactive interactive.types
/-- Basic version of `norm_num` that does not call `simp`. -/
meta def norm_num1 (loc : parse location) : tactic unit :=
do f ← get_step, tactic.norm_num1 f loc
/-- Normalize numerical expressions. Supports the operations
`+` `-` `*` `/` `^` and `%` over numerical types such as
`ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`, `ℂ` and some general algebraic types,
and can prove goals of the form `A = B`, `A ≠ B`, `A < B` and `A ≤ B`,
where `A` and `B` are numerical expressions.
It also has a relatively simple primality prover. -/
meta def norm_num (hs : parse simp_arg_list) (l : parse location) : tactic unit :=
do f ← get_step, tactic.norm_num f hs l
add_hint_tactic "norm_num"
/-- Normalizes a numerical expression and tries to close the goal with the result. -/
meta def apply_normed (x : parse texpr) : tactic unit :=
do x₁ ← to_expr x,
(x₂,_) ← derive x₁,
tactic.exact x₂
/--
Normalises numerical expressions. It supports the operations `+` `-` `*` `/` `^` and `%` over
numerical types such as `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`, `ℂ`, and can prove goals of the form `A = B`, `A ≠ B`,
`A < B` and `A ≤ B`, where `A` and `B` are numerical expressions.
Add-on tactics marked as `@[norm_num]` can extend the behavior of `norm_num` to include other
functions. This is used to support several other functions on `nat` like `prime`, `min_fac` and
`factors`.
```lean
import data.real.basic
example : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
example : (12345.2 : ℝ) ≠ 12345.3 := by norm_num
example : (73 : ℝ) < 789/2 := by norm_num
example : 123456789 + 987654321 = 1111111110 := by norm_num
example (R : Type*) [ring R] : (2 : R) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
example (F : Type*) [linear_ordered_field F] : (2 : F) + 2 < 5 := by norm_num
example : nat.prime (2^13 - 1) := by norm_num
example : ¬ nat.prime (2^11 - 1) := by norm_num
example (x : ℝ) (h : x = 123 + 456) : x = 579 := by norm_num at h; assumption
```
The variant `norm_num1` does not call `simp`.
Both `norm_num` and `norm_num1` can be called inside the `conv` tactic.
The tactic `apply_normed` normalises a numerical expression and tries to close the goal with
the result. Compare:
```lean
def a : ℕ := 2^100
#print a -- 2 ^ 100
def normed_a : ℕ := by apply_normed 2^100
#print normed_a -- 1267650600228229401496703205376
```
-/
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "norm_num",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.norm_num1, `tactic.interactive.norm_num,
`tactic.interactive.apply_normed],
tags := ["arithmetic", "decision procedure"] }
end tactic.interactive
namespace conv.interactive
open conv interactive tactic.interactive
open norm_num (derive)
/-- Basic version of `norm_num` that does not call `simp`. -/
meta def norm_num1 : conv unit := replace_lhs derive
/-- Normalize numerical expressions. Supports the operations
`+` `-` `*` `/` `^` and `%` over numerical types such as
`ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`, `ℂ` and some general algebraic types,
and can prove goals of the form `A = B`, `A ≠ B`, `A < B` and `A ≤ B`,
where `A` and `B` are numerical expressions.
It also has a relatively simple primality prover. -/
meta def norm_num (hs : parse simp_arg_list) : conv unit :=
repeat1 $ orelse' norm_num1 $
conv.interactive.simp ff (simp_arg_type.except ``one_div :: hs) []
{ discharger := tactic.interactive.norm_num1 (loc.ns [none]) }
end conv.interactive
|
ee37060d1e5c36051f5c2fbbb42c24be221b4826 | 64874bd1010548c7f5a6e3e8902efa63baaff785 | /tests/lean/run/inf_tree3.lean | d608c73b7be735c30a62f7fedb166cfc8e40376b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tjiaqi/lean | 4634d729795c164664d10d093f3545287c76628f | d0ce4cf62f4246b0600c07e074d86e51f2195e30 | refs/heads/master | 1,622,323,796,480 | 1,422,643,069,000 | 1,422,643,069,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 752 | lean | import logic data.nat.basic
open nat
inductive inftree (A : Type) : Type :=
leaf : A → inftree A,
node : (nat → inftree A) → inftree A → inftree A
namespace inftree
inductive dsub {A : Type} : inftree A → inftree A → Prop :=
intro₁ : Π (f : nat → inftree A) (a : nat) (t : inftree A), dsub (f a) (node f t),
intro₂ : Π (f : nat → inftree A) (t : inftree A), dsub t (node f t)
definition dsub.node.acc {A : Type} (f : nat → inftree A) (hf : ∀a, acc dsub (f a))
(t : inftree A) (ht : acc dsub t) : acc dsub (node f t) :=
acc.intro (node f t) (λ (y : inftree A) (hlt : dsub y (node f t)),
begin
inversion hlt,
apply (hf a),
apply ht
end)
end inftree
|
cb4a7c1a564fe39a6e035985c4869509fbff132b | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/order/chain.lean | 34b01b9f53c5e91aee0cd370fe21f171bc25b815 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,645 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.set.pairwise.basic
import data.set.lattice
import data.set_like.basic
/-!
# Chains and flags
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines chains for an arbitrary relation and flags for an order and proves Hausdorff's
Maximality Principle.
## Main declarations
* `is_chain s`: A chain `s` is a set of comparable elements.
* `max_chain_spec`: Hausdorff's Maximality Principle.
* `flag`: The type of flags, aka maximal chains, of an order.
## Notes
Originally ported from Isabelle/HOL. The
[original file](https://isabelle.in.tum.de/dist/library/HOL/HOL/Zorn.html) was written by Jacques D.
Fleuriot, Tobias Nipkow, Christian Sternagel.
-/
open classical set
variables {α β : Type*}
/-! ### Chains -/
section chain
variables (r : α → α → Prop)
local infix ` ≺ `:50 := r
/-- A chain is a set `s` satisfying `x ≺ y ∨ x = y ∨ y ≺ x` for all `x y ∈ s`. -/
def is_chain (s : set α) : Prop := s.pairwise (λ x y, x ≺ y ∨ y ≺ x)
/-- `super_chain s t` means that `t` is a chain that strictly includes `s`. -/
def super_chain (s t : set α) : Prop := is_chain r t ∧ s ⊂ t
/-- A chain `s` is a maximal chain if there does not exists a chain strictly including `s`. -/
def is_max_chain (s : set α) : Prop := is_chain r s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, is_chain r t → s ⊆ t → s = t
variables {r} {c c₁ c₂ c₃ s t : set α} {a b x y : α}
lemma is_chain_empty : is_chain r ∅ := set.pairwise_empty _
lemma set.subsingleton.is_chain (hs : s.subsingleton) : is_chain r s := hs.pairwise _
lemma is_chain.mono : s ⊆ t → is_chain r t → is_chain r s := set.pairwise.mono
lemma is_chain.mono_rel {r' : α → α → Prop} (h : is_chain r s)
(h_imp : ∀ x y, r x y → r' x y) : is_chain r' s :=
h.mono' $ λ x y, or.imp (h_imp x y) (h_imp y x)
/-- This can be used to turn `is_chain (≥)` into `is_chain (≤)` and vice-versa. -/
lemma is_chain.symm (h : is_chain r s) : is_chain (flip r) s := h.mono' $ λ _ _, or.symm
lemma is_chain_of_trichotomous [is_trichotomous α r] (s : set α) : is_chain r s :=
λ a _ b _ hab, (trichotomous_of r a b).imp_right $ λ h, h.resolve_left hab
lemma is_chain.insert (hs : is_chain r s) (ha : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → a ≺ b ∨ b ≺ a) :
is_chain r (insert a s) :=
hs.insert_of_symmetric (λ _ _, or.symm) ha
lemma is_chain_univ_iff : is_chain r (univ : set α) ↔ is_trichotomous α r :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, ⟨λ a b , _⟩, λ h, @is_chain_of_trichotomous _ _ h univ⟩,
rw [or.left_comm, or_iff_not_imp_left],
exact h trivial trivial,
end
lemma is_chain.image (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → s (f x) (f y)) {c : set α} (hrc : is_chain r c) :
is_chain s (f '' c) :=
λ x ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ y ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩, ha₂ ▸ hb₂ ▸ λ hxy,
(hrc ha₁ hb₁ $ ne_of_apply_ne f hxy).imp (h _ _) (h _ _)
section total
variables [is_refl α r]
lemma is_chain.total (h : is_chain r s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x ≺ y ∨ y ≺ x :=
(eq_or_ne x y).elim (λ e, or.inl $ e ▸ refl _) (h hx hy)
lemma is_chain.directed_on (H : is_chain r s) : directed_on r s :=
λ x hx y hy, (H.total hx hy).elim (λ h, ⟨y, hy, h, refl _⟩) $ λ h, ⟨x, hx, refl _, h⟩
protected lemma is_chain.directed {f : β → α} {c : set β} (h : is_chain (f ⁻¹'o r) c) :
directed r (λ x : {a : β // a ∈ c}, f x) :=
λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩, by_cases
(λ hab : a = b, by simp only [hab, exists_prop, and_self, subtype.exists];
exact ⟨b, hb, refl _⟩) $
λ hab, (h ha hb hab).elim (λ h, ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, h, refl _⟩) $ λ h, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, refl _, h⟩
lemma is_chain.exists3 (hchain : is_chain r s) [is_trans α r] {a b c}
(mem1 : a ∈ s) (mem2 : b ∈ s) (mem3 : c ∈ s) :
∃ (z) (mem4 : z ∈ s), r a z ∧ r b z ∧ r c z :=
begin
rcases directed_on_iff_directed.mpr (is_chain.directed hchain) a mem1 b mem2 with
⟨z, mem4, H1, H2⟩,
rcases directed_on_iff_directed.mpr (is_chain.directed hchain) z mem4 c mem3 with
⟨z', mem5, H3, H4⟩,
exact ⟨z', mem5, trans H1 H3, trans H2 H3, H4⟩,
end
end total
lemma is_max_chain.is_chain (h : is_max_chain r s) : is_chain r s := h.1
lemma is_max_chain.not_super_chain (h : is_max_chain r s) : ¬super_chain r s t :=
λ ht, ht.2.ne $ h.2 ht.1 ht.2.1
lemma is_max_chain.bot_mem [has_le α] [order_bot α] (h : is_max_chain (≤) s) : ⊥ ∈ s :=
(h.2 (h.1.insert $ λ a _ _, or.inl bot_le) $ subset_insert _ _).symm ▸ mem_insert _ _
lemma is_max_chain.top_mem [has_le α] [order_top α] (h : is_max_chain (≤) s) : ⊤ ∈ s :=
(h.2 (h.1.insert $ λ a _ _, or.inr le_top) $ subset_insert _ _).symm ▸ mem_insert _ _
open_locale classical
/-- Given a set `s`, if there exists a chain `t` strictly including `s`, then `succ_chain s`
is one of these chains. Otherwise it is `s`. -/
def succ_chain (r : α → α → Prop) (s : set α) : set α :=
if h : ∃ t, is_chain r s ∧ super_chain r s t then some h else s
lemma succ_chain_spec (h : ∃ t, is_chain r s ∧ super_chain r s t) :
super_chain r s (succ_chain r s) :=
let ⟨t, hc'⟩ := h in
have is_chain r s ∧ super_chain r s (some h),
from @some_spec _ (λ t, is_chain r s ∧ super_chain r s t) _,
by simp [succ_chain, dif_pos, h, this.right]
lemma is_chain.succ (hs : is_chain r s) : is_chain r (succ_chain r s) :=
if h : ∃ t, is_chain r s ∧ super_chain r s t then (succ_chain_spec h).1
else by { simp [succ_chain, dif_neg, h], exact hs }
lemma is_chain.super_chain_succ_chain (hs₁ : is_chain r s) (hs₂ : ¬ is_max_chain r s) :
super_chain r s (succ_chain r s) :=
begin
simp [is_max_chain, not_and_distrib, not_forall_not] at hs₂,
obtain ⟨t, ht, hst⟩ := hs₂.neg_resolve_left hs₁,
exact succ_chain_spec ⟨t, hs₁, ht, ssubset_iff_subset_ne.2 hst⟩,
end
lemma subset_succ_chain : s ⊆ succ_chain r s :=
if h : ∃ t, is_chain r s ∧ super_chain r s t then (succ_chain_spec h).2.1
else by simp [succ_chain, dif_neg, h, subset.rfl]
/-- Predicate for whether a set is reachable from `∅` using `succ_chain` and `⋃₀`. -/
inductive chain_closure (r : α → α → Prop) : set α → Prop
| succ : ∀ {s}, chain_closure s → chain_closure (succ_chain r s)
| union : ∀ {s}, (∀ a ∈ s, chain_closure a) → chain_closure (⋃₀ s)
/-- An explicit maximal chain. `max_chain` is taken to be the union of all sets in `chain_closure`.
-/
def max_chain (r : α → α → Prop) := ⋃₀ set_of (chain_closure r)
lemma chain_closure_empty : chain_closure r ∅ :=
have chain_closure r (⋃₀ ∅),
from chain_closure.union $ λ a h, h.rec _,
by simpa using this
lemma chain_closure_max_chain : chain_closure r (max_chain r) := chain_closure.union $ λ s, id
private lemma chain_closure_succ_total_aux (hc₁ : chain_closure r c₁) (hc₂ : chain_closure r c₂)
(h : ∀ ⦃c₃⦄, chain_closure r c₃ → c₃ ⊆ c₂ → c₂ = c₃ ∨ succ_chain r c₃ ⊆ c₂) :
succ_chain r c₂ ⊆ c₁ ∨ c₁ ⊆ c₂ :=
begin
induction hc₁,
case succ : c₃ hc₃ ih
{ cases ih with ih ih,
{ exact or.inl (ih.trans subset_succ_chain) },
{ exact (h hc₃ ih).imp_left (λ h, h ▸ subset.rfl) } },
case union : s hs ih
{ refine (or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hn, sUnion_subset $ λ a ha, _),
exact (ih a ha).resolve_left (λ h, hn $ h.trans $ subset_sUnion_of_mem ha) }
end
private lemma chain_closure_succ_total (hc₁ : chain_closure r c₁) (hc₂ : chain_closure r c₂)
(h : c₁ ⊆ c₂) :
c₂ = c₁ ∨ succ_chain r c₁ ⊆ c₂ :=
begin
induction hc₂ generalizing c₁ hc₁ h,
case succ : c₂ hc₂ ih
{ refine (chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₁ hc₂ $ λ c₁, ih).imp h.antisymm' (λ h₁, _),
obtain rfl | h₂ := ih hc₁ h₁,
{ exact subset.rfl },
{ exact h₂.trans subset_succ_chain } },
case union : s hs ih
{ apply or.imp_left h.antisymm',
apply classical.by_contradiction,
simp [not_or_distrib, sUnion_subset_iff, not_forall],
intros c₃ hc₃ h₁ h₂,
obtain h | h := chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₁ (hs c₃ hc₃) (λ c₄, ih _ hc₃),
{ exact h₁ (subset_succ_chain.trans h) },
obtain h' | h' := ih c₃ hc₃ hc₁ h,
{ exact h₁ h'.subset },
{ exact h₂ (h'.trans $ subset_sUnion_of_mem hc₃) } }
end
lemma chain_closure.total (hc₁ : chain_closure r c₁) (hc₂ : chain_closure r c₂) :
c₁ ⊆ c₂ ∨ c₂ ⊆ c₁ :=
(chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₂ hc₁ $ λ c₃ hc₃, chain_closure_succ_total hc₃ hc₁).imp_left
subset_succ_chain.trans
lemma chain_closure.succ_fixpoint (hc₁ : chain_closure r c₁) (hc₂ : chain_closure r c₂)
(hc : succ_chain r c₂ = c₂) :
c₁ ⊆ c₂ :=
begin
induction hc₁,
case succ : s₁ hc₁ h
{ exact (chain_closure_succ_total hc₁ hc₂ h).elim (λ h, h ▸ hc.subset) id },
case union : s hs ih
{ exact sUnion_subset ih }
end
lemma chain_closure.succ_fixpoint_iff (hc : chain_closure r c) :
succ_chain r c = c ↔ c = max_chain r :=
⟨λ h, (subset_sUnion_of_mem hc).antisymm $ chain_closure_max_chain.succ_fixpoint hc h,
λ h, subset_succ_chain.antisymm' $ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hc.succ).trans h.symm.subset⟩
lemma chain_closure.is_chain (hc : chain_closure r c) : is_chain r c :=
begin
induction hc,
case succ : c hc h
{ exact h.succ },
case union : s hs h
{ change ∀ c ∈ s, is_chain r c at h,
exact λ c₁ ⟨t₁, ht₁, (hc₁ : c₁ ∈ t₁)⟩ c₂ ⟨t₂, ht₂, (hc₂ : c₂ ∈ t₂)⟩ hneq,
((hs _ ht₁).total $ hs _ ht₂).elim
(λ ht, h t₂ ht₂ (ht hc₁) hc₂ hneq)
(λ ht, h t₁ ht₁ hc₁ (ht hc₂) hneq) }
end
/-- **Hausdorff's maximality principle**
There exists a maximal totally ordered set of `α`.
Note that we do not require `α` to be partially ordered by `r`. -/
lemma max_chain_spec : is_max_chain r (max_chain r) :=
classical.by_contradiction $ λ h,
let ⟨h₁, H⟩ := chain_closure_max_chain.is_chain.super_chain_succ_chain h in
H.ne (chain_closure_max_chain.succ_fixpoint_iff.mpr rfl).symm
end chain
/-! ### Flags -/
/-- The type of flags, aka maximal chains, of an order. -/
structure flag (α : Type*) [has_le α] :=
(carrier : set α)
(chain' : is_chain (≤) carrier)
(max_chain' : ∀ ⦃s⦄, is_chain (≤) s → carrier ⊆ s → carrier = s)
namespace flag
section has_le
variables [has_le α] {s t : flag α} {a : α}
instance : set_like (flag α) α :=
{ coe := carrier,
coe_injective' := λ s t h, by { cases s, cases t, congr' } }
@[ext] lemma ext : (s : set α) = t → s = t := set_like.ext'
@[simp] lemma mem_coe_iff : a ∈ (s : set α) ↔ a ∈ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (s : set α) (h₁ h₂) : (mk s h₁ h₂ : set α) = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_coe (s : flag α) : mk (s : set α) s.chain' s.max_chain' = s := ext rfl
lemma chain_le (s : flag α) : is_chain (≤) (s : set α) := s.chain'
protected lemma max_chain (s : flag α) : is_max_chain (≤) (s : set α) := ⟨s.chain_le, s.max_chain'⟩
lemma top_mem [order_top α] (s : flag α) : (⊤ : α) ∈ s := s.max_chain.top_mem
lemma bot_mem [order_bot α] (s : flag α) : (⊥ : α) ∈ s := s.max_chain.bot_mem
end has_le
section preorder
variables [preorder α] {a b : α}
protected lemma le_or_le (s : flag α) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a :=
s.chain_le.total ha hb
instance [order_top α] (s : flag α) : order_top s := subtype.order_top s.top_mem
instance [order_bot α] (s : flag α) : order_bot s := subtype.order_bot s.bot_mem
instance [bounded_order α] (s : flag α) : bounded_order s :=
subtype.bounded_order s.bot_mem s.top_mem
end preorder
section partial_order
variables [partial_order α]
lemma chain_lt (s : flag α) : is_chain (<) (s : set α) :=
λ a ha b hb h, (s.le_or_le ha hb).imp h.lt_of_le h.lt_of_le'
instance [decidable_eq α] [@decidable_rel α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (<)] (s : flag α) :
linear_order s :=
{ le_total := λ a b, s.le_or_le a.2 b.2,
decidable_eq := subtype.decidable_eq,
decidable_le := subtype.decidable_le,
decidable_lt := subtype.decidable_lt,
..subtype.partial_order _ }
end partial_order
instance [linear_order α] : unique (flag α) :=
{ default := ⟨univ, is_chain_of_trichotomous _, λ s _, s.subset_univ.antisymm'⟩,
uniq := λ s, set_like.coe_injective $ s.3 (is_chain_of_trichotomous _) $ subset_univ _ }
end flag
|
94829b3d574f86b8e58206051a6b1e9edf327aa7 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/order/liminf_limsup.lean | 20041a7552529ff2410a64751d9a8f4418c0205f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,023 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import order.filter.partial
import order.filter.at_top_bot
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the Liminf/Limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `f.Limsup` (`f.Liminf`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `f.Limsup` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`f.Liminf`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `(f.map u).Limsup`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `Inf (Sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `Inf_n (Sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `Limsup (λx, 1/x)` on ℝ. Then
there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `Sup` beforehand is
not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything. So one can not
use this `Inf Sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has to use a less
tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open filter set
open_locale filter
variables {α β ι : Type*}
namespace filter
section relation
/-- `f.is_bounded (≺)`: the filter `f` is eventually bounded w.r.t. the relation `≺`, i.e.
eventually, it is bounded by some uniform bound.
`r` will be usually instantiated with `≤` or `≥`. -/
def is_bounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : filter α) := ∃ b, ∀ᶠ x in f, r x b
/-- `f.is_bounded_under (≺) u`: the image of the filter `f` under `u` is eventually bounded w.r.t.
the relation `≺`, i.e. eventually, it is bounded by some uniform bound. -/
def is_bounded_under (r : α → α → Prop) (f : filter β) (u : β → α) := (f.map u).is_bounded r
variables {r : α → α → Prop} {f g : filter α}
/-- `f` is eventually bounded if and only if, there exists an admissible set on which it is
bounded. -/
lemma is_bounded_iff : f.is_bounded r ↔ (∃s∈f.sets, ∃b, s ⊆ {x | r x b}) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨b, hb⟩, ⟨{a | r a b}, hb, b, subset.refl _⟩)
(assume ⟨s, hs, b, hb⟩, ⟨b, mem_sets_of_superset hs hb⟩)
/-- A bounded function `u` is in particular eventually bounded. -/
lemma is_bounded_under_of {f : filter β} {u : β → α} :
(∃b, ∀x, r (u x) b) → f.is_bounded_under r u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ := ⟨b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, r (u x) b, from eventually_of_forall hb⟩
lemma is_bounded_bot : is_bounded r ⊥ ↔ nonempty α :=
by simp [is_bounded, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
lemma is_bounded_top : is_bounded r ⊤ ↔ (∃t, ∀x, r x t) :=
by simp [is_bounded, eq_univ_iff_forall]
lemma is_bounded_principal (s : set α) : is_bounded r (𝓟 s) ↔ (∃t, ∀x∈s, r x t) :=
by simp [is_bounded, subset_def]
lemma is_bounded_sup [is_trans α r] (hr : ∀b₁ b₂, ∃b, r b₁ b ∧ r b₂ b) :
is_bounded r f → is_bounded r g → is_bounded r (f ⊔ g)
| ⟨b₁, h₁⟩ ⟨b₂, h₂⟩ := let ⟨b, rb₁b, rb₂b⟩ := hr b₁ b₂ in
⟨b, eventually_sup.mpr ⟨h₁.mono (λ x h, trans h rb₁b), h₂.mono (λ x h, trans h rb₂b)⟩⟩
lemma is_bounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : is_bounded r g → is_bounded r f
| ⟨b, hb⟩ := ⟨b, h hb⟩
lemma is_bounded_under.mono {f g : filter β} {u : β → α} (h : f ≤ g) :
g.is_bounded_under r u → f.is_bounded_under r u :=
λ hg, hg.mono (map_mono h)
lemma is_bounded.is_bounded_under {q : β → β → Prop} {u : α → β}
(hf : ∀a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (u a₀) (u a₁)) : f.is_bounded r → f.is_bounded_under q u
| ⟨b, h⟩ := ⟨u b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, q (u x) (u b), from h.mono (λ x, hf x b)⟩
/-- `is_cobounded (≺) f` states that the filter `f` does not tend to infinity w.r.t. `≺`. This is
also called frequently bounded. Will be usually instantiated with `≤` or `≥`.
There is a subtlety in this definition: we want `f.is_cobounded` to hold for any `f` in the case of
complete lattices. This will be relevant to deduce theorems on complete lattices from their
versions on conditionally complete lattices with additional assumptions. We have to be careful in
the edge case of the trivial filter containing the empty set: the other natural definition
`¬ ∀ a, ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n`
would not work as well in this case.
-/
def is_cobounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : filter α) := ∃b, ∀a, (∀ᶠ x in f, r x a) → r b a
/-- `is_cobounded_under (≺) f u` states that the image of the filter `f` under the map `u` does not
tend to infinity w.r.t. `≺`. This is also called frequently bounded. Will be usually instantiated
with `≤` or `≥`. -/
def is_cobounded_under (r : α → α → Prop) (f : filter β) (u : β → α) := (f.map u).is_cobounded r
/-- To check that a filter is frequently bounded, it suffices to have a witness
which bounds `f` at some point for every admissible set.
This is only an implication, as the other direction is wrong for the trivial filter.-/
lemma is_cobounded.mk [is_trans α r] (a : α) (h : ∀s∈f, ∃x∈s, r a x) : f.is_cobounded r :=
⟨a, assume y s, let ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ s in trans h₂ h₁⟩
/-- A filter which is eventually bounded is in particular frequently bounded (in the opposite
direction). At least if the filter is not trivial. -/
lemma is_bounded.is_cobounded_flip [is_trans α r] [ne_bot f] :
f.is_bounded r → f.is_cobounded (flip r)
| ⟨a, ha⟩ := ⟨a, assume b hb,
let ⟨x, rxa, rbx⟩ := (ha.and hb).exists in
show r b a, from trans rbx rxa⟩
lemma is_cobounded_bot : is_cobounded r ⊥ ↔ (∃b, ∀x, r b x) :=
by simp [is_cobounded]
lemma is_cobounded_top : is_cobounded r ⊤ ↔ nonempty α :=
by simp [is_cobounded, eq_univ_iff_forall, exists_true_iff_nonempty] {contextual := tt}
lemma is_cobounded_principal (s : set α) :
(𝓟 s).is_cobounded r ↔ (∃b, ∀a, (∀x∈s, r x a) → r b a) :=
by simp [is_cobounded, subset_def]
lemma is_cobounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : f.is_cobounded r → g.is_cobounded r
| ⟨b, hb⟩ := ⟨b, assume a ha, hb a (h ha)⟩
end relation
lemma is_cobounded_le_of_bot [order_bot α] {f : filter α} : f.is_cobounded (≤) :=
⟨⊥, assume a h, bot_le⟩
lemma is_cobounded_ge_of_top [order_top α] {f : filter α} : f.is_cobounded (≥) :=
⟨⊤, assume a h, le_top⟩
lemma is_bounded_le_of_top [order_top α] {f : filter α} : f.is_bounded (≤) :=
⟨⊤, eventually_of_forall $ λ _, le_top⟩
lemma is_bounded_ge_of_bot [order_bot α] {f : filter α} : f.is_bounded (≥) :=
⟨⊥, eventually_of_forall $ λ _, bot_le⟩
lemma is_bounded_under_sup [semilattice_sup α] {f : filter β} {u v : β → α} :
f.is_bounded_under (≤) u → f.is_bounded_under (≤) v → f.is_bounded_under (≤) (λa, u a ⊔ v a)
| ⟨bu, (hu : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ bu)⟩ ⟨bv, (hv : ∀ᶠ x in f, v x ≤ bv)⟩ :=
⟨bu ⊔ bv, show ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ⊔ v x ≤ bu ⊔ bv,
by filter_upwards [hu, hv] assume x, sup_le_sup⟩
lemma is_bounded_under_inf [semilattice_inf α] {f : filter β} {u v : β → α} :
f.is_bounded_under (≥) u → f.is_bounded_under (≥) v → f.is_bounded_under (≥) (λa, u a ⊓ v a)
| ⟨bu, (hu : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≥ bu)⟩ ⟨bv, (hv : ∀ᶠ x in f, v x ≥ bv)⟩ :=
⟨bu ⊓ bv, show ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ⊓ v x ≥ bu ⊓ bv,
by filter_upwards [hu, hv] assume x, inf_le_inf⟩
/-- Filters are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `is_bounded_default` in the statements,
in the form `(hf : f.is_bounded (≥) . is_bounded_default)`. -/
meta def is_bounded_default : tactic unit :=
tactic.applyc ``is_cobounded_le_of_bot <|>
tactic.applyc ``is_cobounded_ge_of_top <|>
tactic.applyc ``is_bounded_le_of_top <|>
tactic.applyc ``is_bounded_ge_of_bot
section conditionally_complete_lattice
variables [conditionally_complete_lattice α]
/-- The `Limsup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def Limsup (f : filter α) : α := Inf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `Liminf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def Liminf (f : filter α) : α := Sup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (f : filter β) (u : β → α) : α := (f.map u).Limsup
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (f : filter β) (u : β → α) : α := (f.map u).Liminf
section
variables {f : filter β} {u : β → α}
theorem limsup_eq : f.limsup u = Inf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } := rfl
theorem liminf_eq : f.liminf u = Sup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } := rfl
end
theorem Limsup_le_of_le {f : filter α} {a}
(hf : f.is_cobounded (≤) . is_bounded_default) (h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : f.Limsup ≤ a :=
cInf_le hf h
theorem le_Liminf_of_le {f : filter α} {a}
(hf : f.is_cobounded (≥) . is_bounded_default) (h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ f.Liminf :=
le_cSup hf h
theorem le_Limsup_of_le {f : filter α} {a}
(hf : f.is_bounded (≤) . is_bounded_default) (h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) :
a ≤ f.Limsup :=
le_cInf hf h
theorem Liminf_le_of_le {f : filter α} {a}
(hf : f.is_bounded (≥) . is_bounded_default) (h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) :
f.Liminf ≤ a :=
cSup_le hf h
theorem Liminf_le_Limsup {f : filter α} [ne_bot f]
(h₁ : f.is_bounded (≤) . is_bounded_default) (h₂ : f.is_bounded (≥) . is_bounded_default) :
f.Liminf ≤ f.Limsup :=
Liminf_le_of_le h₂ $ assume a₀ ha₀, le_Limsup_of_le h₁ $ assume a₁ ha₁,
show a₀ ≤ a₁, from let ⟨b, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists in le_trans hb₀ hb₁
lemma Liminf_le_Liminf {f g : filter α}
(hf : f.is_bounded (≥) . is_bounded_default) (hg : g.is_cobounded (≥) . is_bounded_default)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : f.Liminf ≤ g.Liminf :=
cSup_le_cSup hg hf h
lemma Limsup_le_Limsup {f g : filter α}
(hf : f.is_cobounded (≤) . is_bounded_default) (hg : g.is_bounded (≤) . is_bounded_default)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : f.Limsup ≤ g.Limsup :=
cInf_le_cInf hf hg h
lemma Limsup_le_Limsup_of_le {f g : filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.is_cobounded (≤) . is_bounded_default) (hg : g.is_bounded (≤) . is_bounded_default) :
f.Limsup ≤ g.Limsup :=
Limsup_le_Limsup hf hg (assume a ha, h ha)
lemma Liminf_le_Liminf_of_le {f g : filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.is_bounded (≥) . is_bounded_default) (hg : g.is_cobounded (≥) . is_bounded_default) :
f.Liminf ≤ g.Liminf :=
Liminf_le_Liminf hf hg (assume a ha, h ha)
lemma limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice β] {f : filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.is_cobounded_under (≤) u . is_bounded_default)
(hv : f.is_bounded_under (≤) v . is_bounded_default) :
f.limsup u ≤ f.limsup v :=
Limsup_le_Limsup hu hv $ assume b, h.trans
lemma liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice β] {f : filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.is_bounded_under (≥) u . is_bounded_default)
(hv : f.is_cobounded_under (≥) v . is_bounded_default) :
f.liminf u ≤ f.liminf v :=
@limsup_le_limsup (order_dual β) α _ _ _ _ h hv hu
theorem Limsup_principal {s : set α} (h : bdd_above s) (hs : s.nonempty) :
(𝓟 s).Limsup = Sup s :=
by simp [Limsup]; exact cInf_upper_bounds_eq_cSup h hs
theorem Liminf_principal {s : set α} (h : bdd_below s) (hs : s.nonempty) :
(𝓟 s).Liminf = Inf s :=
@Limsup_principal (order_dual α) _ s h hs
lemma limsup_congr {α : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice β] {f : filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup f u = limsup f v :=
begin
rw limsup_eq,
congr' with b,
exact eventually_congr (h.mono $ λ x hx, by simp [hx])
end
lemma liminf_congr {α : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice β] {f : filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf f u = liminf f v :=
@limsup_congr (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ h
lemma limsup_const {α : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice β] {f : filter α} [ne_bot f]
(b : β) : limsup f (λ x, b) = b :=
begin
rw limsup_eq,
apply le_antisymm,
{ exact cInf_le ⟨b, λ a, eventually_const.1⟩ (eventually_le.refl _ _) },
{ exact le_cInf ⟨b, eventually_le.refl _ _⟩ (λ a, eventually_const.1) }
end
lemma liminf_const {α : Type*} [conditionally_complete_lattice β] {f : filter α} [ne_bot f]
(b : β) : liminf f (λ x, b) = b :=
@limsup_const (order_dual β) α _ f _ b
end conditionally_complete_lattice
section complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice α]
@[simp] theorem Limsup_bot : (⊥ : filter α).Limsup = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ Inf_le $ by simp
@[simp] theorem Liminf_bot : (⊥ : filter α).Liminf = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ le_Sup $ by simp
@[simp] theorem Limsup_top : (⊤ : filter α).Limsup = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ le_Inf $
by simp [eq_univ_iff_forall]; exact assume b hb, (top_unique $ hb _)
@[simp] theorem Liminf_top : (⊤ : filter α).Liminf = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ Sup_le $
by simp [eq_univ_iff_forall]; exact assume b hb, (bot_unique $ hb _)
lemma liminf_le_limsup {f : filter β} [ne_bot f] {u : β → α} : liminf f u ≤ limsup f u :=
Liminf_le_Limsup is_bounded_le_of_top is_bounded_ge_of_bot
theorem has_basis.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : filter α} (h : f.has_basis p s) :
f.Limsup = ⨅ i (hi : p i), Sup (s i) :=
le_antisymm
(le_binfi $ λ i hi, Inf_le $ h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, λ x, le_Sup⟩)
(le_Inf $ assume a ha, let ⟨i, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha in
infi_le_of_le _ $ infi_le_of_le hi $ Sup_le ha)
theorem has_basis.Liminf_eq_supr_Inf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {f : filter α}
(h : f.has_basis p s) : f.Liminf = ⨆ i (hi : p i), Inf (s i) :=
@has_basis.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h
theorem Limsup_eq_infi_Sup {f : filter α} : f.Limsup = ⨅ s ∈ f, Sup s :=
f.basis_sets.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup
theorem Liminf_eq_supr_Inf {f : filter α} : f.Liminf = ⨆ s ∈ f, Inf s :=
@Limsup_eq_infi_Sup (order_dual α) _ _
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_infi_supr {f : filter β} {u : β → α} : f.limsup u = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).Limsup_eq_infi_Sup.trans $
by simp only [Sup_image, id]
lemma limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup at_top u = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(at_top_basis.map u).Limsup_eq_infi_Sup.trans $
by simp only [Sup_image, infi_const]; refl
lemma limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup at_top u = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
by simp only [limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat, supr_ge_eq_supr_nat_add]
theorem has_basis.limsup_eq_infi_supr {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set β} {f : filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.has_basis p s) : f.limsup u = ⨅ i (hi : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).Limsup_eq_infi_Sup.trans $ by simp only [Sup_image, id]
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_supr_infi {f : filter β} {u : β → α} : f.liminf u = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
@limsup_eq_infi_supr (order_dual α) β _ _ _
lemma liminf_eq_supr_infi_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf at_top u = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat (order_dual α) _ u
lemma liminf_eq_supr_infi_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf at_top u = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat' (order_dual α) _ _
theorem has_basis.liminf_eq_supr_infi {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set β} {f : filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.has_basis p s) : f.liminf u = ⨆ i (hi : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
@has_basis.limsup_eq_infi_supr (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
end complete_lattice
section conditionally_complete_linear_order
lemma eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf {f : filter α} [conditionally_complete_linear_order β]
{u : α → β} {b : β} (h : b < liminf f u) (hu : f.is_bounded_under (≥) u . is_bounded_default) :
∀ᶠ a in f, b < u a :=
begin
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ : ∃ (c : β) (hc : c ∈ {c : β | ∀ᶠ (n : α) in f, c ≤ u n}), b < c :=
exists_lt_of_lt_cSup hu h,
exact hc.mono (λ x hx, lt_of_lt_of_le hbc hx)
end
lemma eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt {f : filter α} [conditionally_complete_linear_order β]
{u : α → β} {b : β} (h : limsup f u < b) (hu : f.is_bounded_under (≤) u . is_bounded_default) :
∀ᶠ a in f, u a < b :=
@eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ h hu
end conditionally_complete_linear_order
end filter
|
2d0fa92d6ba9211158c3f330583e887a1fa23dee | 4bcaca5dc83d49803f72b7b5920b75b6e7d9de2d | /stage0/src/Init/Meta.lean | 0f073c80083c34ee51701159c4db5ade0d591275 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | subfish-zhou/leanprover-zh_CN.github.io | 30b9fba9bd790720bd95764e61ae796697d2f603 | 8b2985d4a3d458ceda9361ac454c28168d920d3f | refs/heads/master | 1,689,709,967,820 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 409,962,097 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 33,858 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura and Sebastian Ullrich
Additional goodies for writing macros
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Basic
namespace Lean
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_MAJOR)"]
private constant version.getMajor (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.major : Nat := version.getMajor ()
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR)"]
private constant version.getMinor (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.minor : Nat := version.getMinor ()
@[extern c inline "lean_box(LEAN_VERSION_PATCH)"]
private constant version.getPatch (u : Unit) : Nat
def version.patch : Nat := version.getPatch ()
-- @[extern c inline "lean_mk_string(LEAN_GITHASH)"]
-- constant getGithash (u : Unit) : String
-- def githash : String := getGithash ()
@[extern c inline "LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE"]
constant version.getIsRelease (u : Unit) : Bool
def version.isRelease : Bool := version.getIsRelease ()
/-- Additional version description like "nightly-2018-03-11" -/
@[extern c inline "lean_mk_string(LEAN_SPECIAL_VERSION_DESC)"]
constant version.getSpecialDesc (u : Unit) : String
def version.specialDesc : String := version.getSpecialDesc ()
/- Valid identifier names -/
def isGreek (c : Char) : Bool :=
0x391 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3dd
def isLetterLike (c : Char) : Bool :=
(0x3b1 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3c9 && c.val ≠ 0x3bb) || -- Lower greek, but lambda
(0x391 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3A9 && c.val ≠ 0x3A0 && c.val ≠ 0x3A3) || -- Upper greek, but Pi and Sigma
(0x3ca ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x3fb) || -- Coptic letters
(0x1f00 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1ffe) || -- Polytonic Greek Extended Character Set
(0x2100 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x214f) || -- Letter like block
(0x1d49c ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1d59f) -- Latin letters, Script, Double-struck, Fractur
def isNumericSubscript (c : Char) : Bool :=
0x2080 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x2089
def isSubScriptAlnum (c : Char) : Bool :=
isNumericSubscript c ||
(0x2090 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x209c) ||
(0x1d62 ≤ c.val && c.val ≤ 0x1d6a)
def isIdFirst (c : Char) : Bool :=
c.isAlpha || c = '_' || isLetterLike c
def isIdRest (c : Char) : Bool :=
c.isAlphanum || c = '_' || c = '\'' || c == '!' || c == '?' || isLetterLike c || isSubScriptAlnum c
def idBeginEscape := '«'
def idEndEscape := '»'
def isIdBeginEscape (c : Char) : Bool := c = idBeginEscape
def isIdEndEscape (c : Char) : Bool := c = idEndEscape
namespace Name
def getRoot : Name → Name
| anonymous => anonymous
| n@(str anonymous _ _) => n
| n@(num anonymous _ _) => n
| str n _ _ => getRoot n
| num n _ _ => getRoot n
@[export lean_is_inaccessible_user_name]
def isInaccessibleUserName : Name → Bool
| Name.str _ s _ => s.contains '✝' || s == "_inaccessible"
| Name.num p idx _ => isInaccessibleUserName p
| _ => false
def escapePart (s : String) : Option String :=
if s.length > 0 && isIdFirst s[0] && (s.toSubstring.drop 1).all isIdRest then s
else if s.any isIdEndEscape then none
else some <| idBeginEscape.toString ++ s ++ idEndEscape.toString
-- NOTE: does not roundtrip even with `escape = true` if name is anonymous or contains numeric part or `idEndEscape`
variable (sep : String) (escape : Bool)
def toStringWithSep : Name → String
| anonymous => "[anonymous]"
| str anonymous s _ => maybeEscape s
| num anonymous v _ => toString v
| str n s _ => toStringWithSep n ++ sep ++ maybeEscape s
| num n v _ => toStringWithSep n ++ sep ++ Nat.repr v
where
maybeEscape s := if escape then escapePart s |>.getD s else s
protected def toString (n : Name) (escape := true) : String :=
-- never escape "prettified" inaccessible names or macro scopes or pseudo-syntax introduced by the delaborator
toStringWithSep "." (escape && !n.isInaccessibleUserName && !n.hasMacroScopes && !maybePseudoSyntax) n
where
maybePseudoSyntax :=
if let Name.str _ s _ := n.getRoot then
-- could be pseudo-syntax for loose bvar or universe mvar, output as is
"#".isPrefixOf s || "?".isPrefixOf s
else
false
instance : ToString Name where
toString n := n.toString
private def hasNum : Name → Bool
| anonymous => false
| num .. => true
| str p .. => hasNum p
protected def reprPrec (n : Name) (prec : Nat) : Std.Format :=
match n with
| anonymous => Std.Format.text "Lean.Name.anonymous"
| num p i _ => Repr.addAppParen ("Lean.Name.mkNum " ++ Name.reprPrec p max_prec ++ " " ++ repr i) prec
| str p s _ =>
if p.hasNum then
Repr.addAppParen ("Lean.Name.mkStr " ++ Name.reprPrec p max_prec ++ " " ++ repr s) prec
else
Std.Format.text "`" ++ n.toString
instance : Repr Name where
reprPrec := Name.reprPrec
deriving instance Repr for Syntax
def capitalize : Name → Name
| Name.str p s _ => Name.mkStr p s.capitalize
| n => n
def replacePrefix : Name → Name → Name → Name
| anonymous, anonymous, newP => newP
| anonymous, _, _ => anonymous
| n@(str p s _), queryP, newP => if n == queryP then newP else Name.mkStr (p.replacePrefix queryP newP) s
| n@(num p s _), queryP, newP => if n == queryP then newP else Name.mkNum (p.replacePrefix queryP newP) s
/-- Remove macros scopes, apply `f`, and put them back -/
@[inline] def modifyBase (n : Name) (f : Name → Name) : Name :=
if n.hasMacroScopes then
let view := extractMacroScopes n
{ view with name := f view.name }.review
else
f n
@[export lean_name_append_after]
def appendAfter (n : Name) (suffix : String) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| str p s _ => Name.mkStr p (s ++ suffix)
| n => Name.mkStr n suffix
@[export lean_name_append_index_after]
def appendIndexAfter (n : Name) (idx : Nat) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| str p s _ => Name.mkStr p (s ++ "_" ++ toString idx)
| n => Name.mkStr n ("_" ++ toString idx)
@[export lean_name_append_before]
def appendBefore (n : Name) (pre : String) : Name :=
n.modifyBase fun
| anonymous => Name.mkStr anonymous pre
| str p s _ => Name.mkStr p (pre ++ s)
| num p n _ => Name.mkNum (Name.mkStr p pre) n
end Name
structure NameGenerator where
namePrefix : Name := `_uniq
idx : Nat := 1
deriving Inhabited
namespace NameGenerator
@[inline] def curr (g : NameGenerator) : Name :=
Name.mkNum g.namePrefix g.idx
@[inline] def next (g : NameGenerator) : NameGenerator :=
{ g with idx := g.idx + 1 }
@[inline] def mkChild (g : NameGenerator) : NameGenerator × NameGenerator :=
({ namePrefix := Name.mkNum g.namePrefix g.idx, idx := 1 },
{ g with idx := g.idx + 1 })
end NameGenerator
class MonadNameGenerator (m : Type → Type) where
getNGen : m NameGenerator
setNGen : NameGenerator → m Unit
export MonadNameGenerator (getNGen setNGen)
def mkFreshId {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadNameGenerator m] : m Name := do
let ngen ← getNGen
let r := ngen.curr
setNGen ngen.next
pure r
instance monadNameGeneratorLift (m n : Type → Type) [MonadLift m n] [MonadNameGenerator m] : MonadNameGenerator n := {
getNGen := liftM (getNGen : m _),
setNGen := fun ngen => liftM (setNGen ngen : m _)
}
namespace Syntax
partial def structEq : Syntax → Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.missing, Syntax.missing => true
| Syntax.node k args, Syntax.node k' args' => k == k' && args.isEqv args' structEq
| Syntax.atom _ val, Syntax.atom _ val' => val == val'
| Syntax.ident _ rawVal val preresolved, Syntax.ident _ rawVal' val' preresolved' => rawVal == rawVal' && val == val' && preresolved == preresolved'
| _, _ => false
instance : BEq Lean.Syntax := ⟨structEq⟩
partial def getTailInfo? : Syntax → Option SourceInfo
| atom info _ => info
| ident info .. => info
| node _ args => args.findSomeRev? getTailInfo?
| _ => none
def getTailInfo (stx : Syntax) : SourceInfo :=
stx.getTailInfo?.getD SourceInfo.none
def getTrailingSize (stx : Syntax) : Nat :=
match stx.getTailInfo? with
| some (SourceInfo.original (trailing := trailing) ..) => trailing.bsize
| _ => 0
@[specialize] private partial def updateLast {α} [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option α) (i : Nat) : Option (Array α) :=
if i == 0 then
none
else
let i := i - 1
let v := a[i]
match f v with
| some v => some <| a.set! i v
| none => updateLast a f i
partial def setTailInfoAux (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| atom _ val => some <| atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => some <| ident info rawVal val pre
| node k args =>
match updateLast args (setTailInfoAux info) args.size with
| some args => some <| node k args
| none => none
| stx => none
def setTailInfo (stx : Syntax) (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax :=
match setTailInfoAux info stx with
| some stx => stx
| none => stx
def unsetTrailing (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx.getTailInfo with
| SourceInfo.original lead pos trail endPos => stx.setTailInfo (SourceInfo.original lead pos "".toSubstring endPos)
| _ => stx
@[specialize] private partial def updateFirst {α} [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option α) (i : Nat) : Option (Array α) :=
if h : i < a.size then
let v := a.get ⟨i, h⟩;
match f v with
| some v => some <| a.set ⟨i, h⟩ v
| none => updateFirst a f (i+1)
else
none
partial def setHeadInfoAux (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| atom _ val => some <| atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => some <| ident info rawVal val pre
| node k args =>
match updateFirst args (setHeadInfoAux info) 0 with
| some args => some <| node k args
| noxne => none
| stx => none
def setHeadInfo (stx : Syntax) (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax :=
match setHeadInfoAux info stx with
| some stx => stx
| none => stx
def setInfo (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Syntax
| atom _ val => atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => ident info rawVal val pre
| stx => stx
/-- Return the first atom/identifier that has position information -/
partial def getHead? : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(atom info ..) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| stx@(ident info ..) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| node _ args => args.findSome? getHead?
| _ => none
def copyHeadTailInfoFrom (target source : Syntax) : Syntax :=
target.setHeadInfo source.getHeadInfo |>.setTailInfo source.getTailInfo
end Syntax
/-- Use the head atom/identifier of the current `ref` as the `ref` -/
@[inline] def withHeadRefOnly {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadRef m] {α} (x : m α) : m α := do
match (← getRef).getHead? with
| none => x
| some ref => withRef ref x
@[inline] def mkNode (k : SyntaxNodeKind) (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
Syntax.node k args
/- Syntax objects for a Lean module. -/
structure Module where
header : Syntax
commands : Array Syntax
/-- Expand all macros in the given syntax -/
partial def expandMacros : Syntax → MacroM Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node k args) => do
match (← expandMacro? stx) with
| some stxNew => expandMacros stxNew
| none => do
let args ← Macro.withIncRecDepth stx <| args.mapM expandMacros
pure <| Syntax.node k args
| stx => pure stx
/- Helper functions for processing Syntax programmatically -/
/--
Create an identifier copying the position from `src`.
To refer to a specific constant, use `mkCIdentFrom` instead. -/
def mkIdentFrom (src : Syntax) (val : Name) : Syntax :=
Syntax.ident (SourceInfo.fromRef src) (toString val).toSubstring val []
def mkIdentFromRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] (val : Name) : m Syntax := do
return mkIdentFrom (← getRef) val
/--
Create an identifier referring to a constant `c` copying the position from `src`.
This variant of `mkIdentFrom` makes sure that the identifier cannot accidentally
be captured. -/
def mkCIdentFrom (src : Syntax) (c : Name) : Syntax :=
-- Remark: We use the reserved macro scope to make sure there are no accidental collision with our frontend
let id := addMacroScope `_internal c reservedMacroScope
Syntax.ident (SourceInfo.fromRef src) (toString id).toSubstring id [(c, [])]
def mkCIdentFromRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] (c : Name) : m Syntax := do
return mkCIdentFrom (← getRef) c
def mkCIdent (c : Name) : Syntax :=
mkCIdentFrom Syntax.missing c
@[export lean_mk_syntax_ident]
def mkIdent (val : Name) : Syntax :=
Syntax.ident SourceInfo.none (toString val).toSubstring val []
@[inline] def mkNullNode (args : Array Syntax := #[]) : Syntax :=
Syntax.node nullKind args
@[inline] def mkGroupNode (args : Array Syntax := #[]) : Syntax :=
Syntax.node groupKind args
def mkSepArray (as : Array Syntax) (sep : Syntax) : Array Syntax := do
let mut i := 0
let mut r := #[]
for a in as do
if i > 0 then
r := r.push sep |>.push a
else
r := r.push a
i := i + 1
return r
def mkOptionalNode (arg : Option Syntax) : Syntax :=
match arg with
| some arg => Syntax.node nullKind #[arg]
| none => Syntax.node nullKind #[]
def mkHole (ref : Syntax) : Syntax :=
Syntax.node `Lean.Parser.Term.hole #[mkAtomFrom ref "_"]
namespace Syntax
def mkSep (a : Array Syntax) (sep : Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkNullNode <| mkSepArray a sep
def SepArray.ofElems {sep} (elems : Array Syntax) : SepArray sep :=
⟨mkSepArray elems (mkAtom sep)⟩
def SepArray.ofElemsUsingRef [Monad m] [MonadRef m] {sep} (elems : Array Syntax) : m (SepArray sep) := do
let ref ← getRef;
return ⟨mkSepArray elems (mkAtomFrom ref sep)⟩
instance (sep) : Coe (Array Syntax) (SepArray sep) where
coe := SepArray.ofElems
/-- Create syntax representing a Lean term application, but avoid degenerate empty applications. -/
def mkApp (fn : Syntax) : (args : Array Syntax) → Syntax
| #[] => fn
| args => Syntax.node `Lean.Parser.Term.app #[fn, mkNullNode args]
def mkCApp (fn : Name) (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkApp (mkCIdent fn) args
def mkLit (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
let atom : Syntax := Syntax.atom info val
Syntax.node kind #[atom]
def mkStrLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
mkLit strLitKind (String.quote val) info
def mkNumLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
mkLit numLitKind val info
def mkScientificLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
mkLit scientificLitKind val info
def mkNameLit (val : String) (info := SourceInfo.none) : Syntax :=
mkLit nameLitKind val info
/- Recall that we don't have special Syntax constructors for storing numeric and string atoms.
The idea is to have an extensible approach where embedded DSLs may have new kind of atoms and/or
different ways of representing them. So, our atoms contain just the parsed string.
The main Lean parser uses the kind `numLitKind` for storing natural numbers that can be encoded
in binary, octal, decimal and hexadecimal format. `isNatLit` implements a "decoder"
for Syntax objects representing these numerals. -/
private partial def decodeBinLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if c == '0' then decodeBinLitAux s (s.next i) (2*val)
else if c == '1' then decodeBinLitAux s (s.next i) (2*val + 1)
else none
private partial def decodeOctalLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '7' then decodeOctalLitAux s (s.next i) (8*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else none
private def decodeHexDigit (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Nat × String.Pos) :=
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then some (c.toNat - '0'.toNat, i)
else if 'a' ≤ c && c ≤ 'f' then some (10 + c.toNat - 'a'.toNat, i)
else if 'A' ≤ c && c ≤ 'F' then some (10 + c.toNat - 'A'.toNat, i)
else none
private partial def decodeHexLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else match decodeHexDigit s i with
| some (d, i) => decodeHexLitAux s i (16*val + d)
| none => none
private partial def decodeDecimalLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option Nat :=
if s.atEnd i then some val
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then decodeDecimalLitAux s (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else none
def decodeNatLitVal? (s : String) : Option Nat :=
let len := s.length
if len == 0 then none
else
let c := s.get 0
if c == '0' then
if len == 1 then some 0
else
let c := s.get 1
if c == 'x' || c == 'X' then decodeHexLitAux s 2 0
else if c == 'b' || c == 'B' then decodeBinLitAux s 2 0
else if c == 'o' || c == 'O' then decodeOctalLitAux s 2 0
else if c.isDigit then decodeDecimalLitAux s 0 0
else none
else if c.isDigit then decodeDecimalLitAux s 0 0
else none
def isLit? (litKind : SyntaxNodeKind) (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node k args =>
if k == litKind && args.size == 1 then
match args.get! 0 with
| (Syntax.atom _ val) => some val
| _ => none
else
none
| _ => none
private def isNatLitAux (litKind : SyntaxNodeKind) (stx : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
match isLit? litKind stx with
| some val => decodeNatLitVal? val
| _ => none
def isNatLit? (s : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
isNatLitAux numLitKind s
def isFieldIdx? (s : Syntax) : Option Nat :=
isNatLitAux fieldIdxKind s
partial def decodeScientificLitVal? (s : String) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
let len := s.length
if len == 0 then none
else
let c := s.get 0
if c.isDigit then
decode 0 0
else none
where
decodeAfterExp (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) (sign : Bool) (exp : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
if sign then
some (val, sign, exp + e)
else if exp >= e then
some (val, sign, exp - e)
else
some (val, true, e - exp)
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decodeAfterExp (s.next i) val e sign (10*exp + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else
none
decodeExp (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
let c := s.get i
if c == '-' then
decodeAfterExp (s.next i) val e true 0
else
decodeAfterExp i val e false 0
decodeAfterDot (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) (e : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
some (val, true, e)
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decodeAfterDot (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat) (e+1)
else if c == 'e' || c == 'E' then
decodeExp (s.next i) val e
else
none
decode (i : String.Pos) (val : Nat) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
if s.atEnd i then
none
else
let c := s.get i
if '0' ≤ c && c ≤ '9' then
decode (s.next i) (10*val + c.toNat - '0'.toNat)
else if c == '.' then
decodeAfterDot (s.next i) val 0
else if c == 'e' || c == 'E' then
decodeExp (s.next i) val 0
else
none
def isScientificLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option (Nat × Bool × Nat) :=
match isLit? scientificLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeScientificLitVal? val
| _ => none
def isIdOrAtom? : Syntax → Option String
| Syntax.atom _ val => some val
| Syntax.ident _ rawVal _ _ => some rawVal.toString
| _ => none
def toNat (stx : Syntax) : Nat :=
match stx.isNatLit? with
| some val => val
| none => 0
def decodeQuotedChar (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Char × String.Pos) :=
OptionM.run do
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\\' then pure ('\\', i)
else if c = '\"' then pure ('\"', i)
else if c = '\'' then pure ('\'', i)
else if c = 'r' then pure ('\r', i)
else if c = 'n' then pure ('\n', i)
else if c = 't' then pure ('\t', i)
else if c = 'x' then
let (d₁, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₂, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
pure (Char.ofNat (16*d₁ + d₂), i)
else if c = 'u' then do
let (d₁, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₂, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₃, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
let (d₄, i) ← decodeHexDigit s i
pure (Char.ofNat (16*(16*(16*d₁ + d₂) + d₃) + d₄), i)
else
none
partial def decodeStrLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (acc : String) : Option String :=
OptionM.run do
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\"' then
pure acc
else if s.atEnd i then
none
else if c == '\\' then do
let (c, i) ← decodeQuotedChar s i
decodeStrLitAux s i (acc.push c)
else
decodeStrLitAux s i (acc.push c)
def decodeStrLit (s : String) : Option String :=
decodeStrLitAux s 1 ""
def isStrLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match isLit? strLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeStrLit val
| _ => none
def decodeCharLit (s : String) : Option Char :=
OptionM.run do
let c := s.get 1
if c == '\\' then do
let (c, _) ← decodeQuotedChar s 2
pure c
else
pure c
def isCharLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option Char :=
match isLit? charLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeCharLit val
| _ => none
private partial def splitNameLitAux (ss : Substring) (acc : List Substring) : List Substring :=
let splitRest (ss : Substring) (acc : List Substring) : List Substring :=
if ss.front == '.' then
splitNameLitAux (ss.drop 1) acc
else if ss.isEmpty then
acc
else
[]
if ss.isEmpty then []
else
let curr := ss.front
if isIdBeginEscape curr then
let escapedPart := ss.takeWhile (!isIdEndEscape ·)
let escapedPart := { escapedPart with stopPos := ss.stopPos.min (escapedPart.str.next escapedPart.stopPos) }
if !isIdEndEscape (escapedPart.get <| escapedPart.prev escapedPart.bsize) then []
else splitRest (ss.extract escapedPart.bsize ss.bsize) (escapedPart :: acc)
else if isIdFirst curr then
let idPart := ss.takeWhile isIdRest
splitRest (ss.extract idPart.bsize ss.bsize) (idPart :: acc)
else if curr.isDigit then
let idPart := ss.takeWhile Char.isDigit
splitRest (ss.extract idPart.bsize ss.bsize) (idPart :: acc)
else
[]
/-- Split a name literal (without the backtick) into its dot-separated components. For example,
`foo.bla.«bo.o»` ↦ `["foo", "bla", "«bo.o»"]`. If the literal cannot be parsed, return `[]`. -/
def splitNameLit (ss : Substring) : List Substring :=
splitNameLitAux ss [] |>.reverse
def decodeNameLit (s : String) : Option Name :=
if s.get 0 == '`' then
match splitNameLitAux (s.toSubstring.drop 1) [] with
| [] => none
| comps => some <| comps.foldr (init := Name.anonymous)
fun comp n =>
let comp := comp.toString
if isIdBeginEscape comp.front then
Name.mkStr n (comp.drop 1 |>.dropRight 1)
else if comp.front.isDigit then
if let some k := decodeNatLitVal? comp then
Name.mkNum n k
else
unreachable!
else
Name.mkStr n comp
else
none
def isNameLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option Name :=
match isLit? nameLitKind stx with
| some val => decodeNameLit val
| _ => none
def hasArgs : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node _ args => args.size > 0
| _ => false
def isAtom : Syntax → Bool
| atom _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isToken (token : String) : Syntax → Bool
| atom _ val => val.trim == token.trim
| _ => false
def isNone (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node k args => k == nullKind && args.size == 0
-- when elaborating partial syntax trees, it's reasonable to interpret missing parts as `none`
| Syntax.missing => true
| _ => false
def getOptional? (stx : Syntax) : Option Syntax :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node k args => if k == nullKind && args.size == 1 then some (args.get! 0) else none
| _ => none
def getOptionalIdent? (stx : Syntax) : Option Name :=
match stx.getOptional? with
| some stx => some stx.getId
| none => none
partial def findAux (p : Syntax → Bool) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node _ args) => if p stx then some stx else args.findSome? (findAux p)
| stx => if p stx then some stx else none
def find? (stx : Syntax) (p : Syntax → Bool) : Option Syntax :=
findAux p stx
end Syntax
/-- Reflect a runtime datum back to surface syntax (best-effort). -/
class Quote (α : Type) where
quote : α → Syntax
export Quote (quote)
instance : Quote Syntax := ⟨id⟩
instance : Quote Bool := ⟨fun | true => mkCIdent `Bool.true | false => mkCIdent `Bool.false⟩
instance : Quote String := ⟨Syntax.mkStrLit⟩
instance : Quote Nat := ⟨fun n => Syntax.mkNumLit <| toString n⟩
instance : Quote Substring := ⟨fun s => Syntax.mkCApp `String.toSubstring #[quote s.toString]⟩
-- in contrast to `Name.toString`, we can, and want to be, precise here
private def getEscapedNameParts? (acc : List String) : Name → OptionM (List String)
| Name.anonymous => acc
| Name.str n s _ => do
let s ← Name.escapePart s
getEscapedNameParts? (s::acc) n
| Name.num n i _ => none
private def quoteNameMk : Name → Syntax
| Name.anonymous => mkCIdent ``Name.anonymous
| Name.str n s _ => Syntax.mkCApp ``Name.mkStr #[quoteNameMk n, quote s]
| Name.num n i _ => Syntax.mkCApp ``Name.mkNum #[quoteNameMk n, quote i]
instance : Quote Name where
quote n := match getEscapedNameParts? [] n with
| some ss => mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ ".".intercalate ss)]
| none => quoteNameMk n
instance {α β : Type} [Quote α] [Quote β] : Quote (α × β) where
quote
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Syntax.mkCApp ``Prod.mk #[quote a, quote b]
private def quoteList {α : Type} [Quote α] : List α → Syntax
| [] => mkCIdent ``List.nil
| (x::xs) => Syntax.mkCApp ``List.cons #[quote x, quoteList xs]
instance {α : Type} [Quote α] : Quote (List α) where
quote := quoteList
instance {α : Type} [Quote α] : Quote (Array α) where
quote xs := Syntax.mkCApp ``List.toArray #[quote xs.toList]
private def quoteOption {α : Type} [Quote α] : Option α → Syntax
| none => mkIdent ``none
| (some x) => Syntax.mkCApp ``some #[quote x]
instance Option.hasQuote {α : Type} [Quote α] : Quote (Option α) where
quote := quoteOption
/- Evaluator for `prec` DSL -/
def evalPrec (stx : Syntax) : MacroM Nat :=
Macro.withIncRecDepth stx do
let stx ← expandMacros stx
match stx with
| `(prec| $num:numLit) => return num.isNatLit?.getD 0
| _ => Macro.throwErrorAt stx "unexpected precedence"
macro_rules
| `(prec| $a + $b) => do `(prec| $(quote <| (← evalPrec a) + (← evalPrec b)):numLit)
macro_rules
| `(prec| $a - $b) => do `(prec| $(quote <| (← evalPrec a) - (← evalPrec b)):numLit)
macro "eval_prec " p:prec:max : term => return quote (← evalPrec p)
/- Evaluator for `prio` DSL -/
def evalPrio (stx : Syntax) : MacroM Nat :=
Macro.withIncRecDepth stx do
let stx ← expandMacros stx
match stx with
| `(prio| $num:numLit) => return num.isNatLit?.getD 0
| _ => Macro.throwErrorAt stx "unexpected priority"
macro_rules
| `(prio| $a + $b) => do `(prio| $(quote <| (← evalPrio a) + (← evalPrio b)):numLit)
macro_rules
| `(prio| $a - $b) => do `(prio| $(quote <| (← evalPrio a) - (← evalPrio b)):numLit)
macro "eval_prio " p:prio:max : term => return quote (← evalPrio p)
def evalOptPrio : Option Syntax → MacroM Nat
| some prio => evalPrio prio
| none => return eval_prio default
end Lean
namespace Array
abbrev getSepElems := @getEvenElems
open Lean
private partial def filterSepElemsMAux {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → m Bool) (i : Nat) (acc : Array Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) := do
if h : i < a.size then
let stx := a.get ⟨i, h⟩
if (← p stx) then
if acc.isEmpty then
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) (acc.push stx)
else if hz : i ≠ 0 then
have : i.pred < i := Nat.pred_lt hz
let sepStx := a.get ⟨i.pred, Nat.lt_trans this h⟩
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) ((acc.push sepStx).push stx)
else
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) (acc.push stx)
else
filterSepElemsMAux a p (i+2) acc
else
pure acc
def filterSepElemsM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → m Bool) : m (Array Syntax) :=
filterSepElemsMAux a p 0 #[]
def filterSepElems (a : Array Syntax) (p : Syntax → Bool) : Array Syntax :=
Id.run <| a.filterSepElemsM p
private partial def mapSepElemsMAux {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → m Syntax) (i : Nat) (acc : Array Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) := do
if h : i < a.size then
let stx := a.get ⟨i, h⟩
if i % 2 == 0 then do
let stx ← f stx
mapSepElemsMAux a f (i+1) (acc.push stx)
else
mapSepElemsMAux a f (i+1) (acc.push stx)
else
pure acc
def mapSepElemsM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → m Syntax) : m (Array Syntax) :=
mapSepElemsMAux a f 0 #[]
def mapSepElems (a : Array Syntax) (f : Syntax → Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
Id.run <| a.mapSepElemsM f
end Array
namespace Lean.Syntax.SepArray
def getElems {sep} (sa : SepArray sep) : Array Syntax :=
sa.elemsAndSeps.getSepElems
/-
We use `CoeTail` here instead of `Coe` to avoid a "loop" when computing `CoeTC`.
The "loop" is interrupted using the maximum instance size threshold, but it is a performance bottleneck.
The loop occurs because the predicate `isNewAnswer` is too imprecise.
-/
instance (sep) : CoeTail (SepArray sep) (Array Syntax) where
coe := getElems
end Lean.Syntax.SepArray
/--
Gadget for automatic parameter support. This is similar to the `optParam` gadget, but it uses
the given tactic.
Like `optParam`, this gadget only affects elaboration.
For example, the tactic will *not* be invoked during type class resolution. -/
abbrev autoParam.{u} (α : Sort u) (tactic : Lean.Syntax) : Sort u := α
/- Helper functions for manipulating interpolated strings -/
namespace Lean.Syntax
private def decodeInterpStrQuotedChar (s : String) (i : String.Pos) : Option (Char × String.Pos) :=
OptionM.run do
match decodeQuotedChar s i with
| some r => some r
| none =>
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '{' then pure ('{', i)
else none
private partial def decodeInterpStrLit (s : String) : Option String :=
let rec loop (i : String.Pos) (acc : String) : OptionM String :=
let c := s.get i
let i := s.next i
if c == '\"' || c == '{' then
pure acc
else if s.atEnd i then
none
else if c == '\\' then do
let (c, i) ← decodeInterpStrQuotedChar s i
loop i (acc.push c)
else
loop i (acc.push c)
loop 1 ""
partial def isInterpolatedStrLit? (stx : Syntax) : Option String :=
match isLit? interpolatedStrLitKind stx with
| none => none
| some val => decodeInterpStrLit val
def expandInterpolatedStrChunks (chunks : Array Syntax) (mkAppend : Syntax → Syntax → MacroM Syntax) (mkElem : Syntax → MacroM Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
let mut i := 0
let mut result := Syntax.missing
for elem in chunks do
let elem ← match elem.isInterpolatedStrLit? with
| none => mkElem elem
| some str => mkElem (Syntax.mkStrLit str)
if i == 0 then
result := elem
else
result ← mkAppend result elem
i := i+1
return result
def expandInterpolatedStr (interpStr : Syntax) (type : Syntax) (toTypeFn : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
let ref := interpStr
let r ← expandInterpolatedStrChunks interpStr.getArgs (fun a b => `($a ++ $b)) (fun a => `($toTypeFn $a))
`(($r : $type))
def getSepArgs (stx : Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
stx.getArgs.getSepElems
end Syntax
namespace Meta
inductive TransparencyMode where
| all | default | reducible | instances
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
namespace Simp
def defaultMaxSteps := 100000
structure Config where
maxSteps : Nat := defaultMaxSteps
maxDischargeDepth : Nat := 2
contextual : Bool := false
memoize : Bool := true
singlePass : Bool := false
zeta : Bool := true
beta : Bool := true
eta : Bool := true
iota : Bool := true
proj : Bool := true
decide : Bool := true
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
-- Configuration object for `simp_all`
structure ConfigCtx extends Config where
contextual := true
end Simp
namespace Rewrite
structure Config where
transparency : TransparencyMode := TransparencyMode.reducible
offsetCnstrs : Bool := true
end Rewrite
end Meta
namespace Parser.Tactic
macro "erw " s:rwRuleSeq loc:(location)? : tactic =>
`(rw (config := { transparency := Lean.Meta.TransparencyMode.default }) $s:rwRuleSeq $[$(loc.getOptional?):location]?)
end Parser.Tactic
end Lean
|
c854c628eabe52141c0c3d6e1a7bcbc942eed09f | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/convex/integral.lean | 2bb94caed20b260dd4f9e137ba44fd46c41b2a76 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,777 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.convex.function
import analysis.convex.strict_convex_space
import measure_theory.function.ae_eq_of_integral
import measure_theory.integral.average
/-!
# Jensen's inequality for integrals
In this file we prove several forms of Jensen's inequality for integrals.
- for convex sets: `convex.average_mem`, `convex.set_average_mem`, `convex.integral_mem`;
- for convex functions: `convex.on.average_mem_epigraph`, `convex_on.map_average_le`,
`convex_on.set_average_mem_epigraph`, `convex_on.map_set_average_le`, `convex_on.map_integral_le`;
- for strictly convex sets: `strict_convex.ae_eq_const_or_average_mem_interior`;
- for a closed ball in a strictly convex normed space:
`ae_eq_const_or_norm_integral_lt_of_norm_le_const`;
- for strictly convex functions: `strict_convex_on.ae_eq_const_or_map_average_lt`.
## TODO
- Use a typeclass for strict convexity of a closed ball.
## Tags
convex, integral, center mass, average value, Jensen's inequality
-/
open measure_theory measure_theory.measure metric set filter topological_space function
open_locale topological_space big_operators ennreal convex
variables {α E F : Type*} {m0 : measurable_space α}
[normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E]
[normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] [complete_space F]
{μ : measure α} {s : set E} {t : set α} {f : α → E} {g : E → ℝ} {C : ℝ}
/-!
### Non-strict Jensen's inequality
-/
/-- If `μ` is a probability measure on `α`, `s` is a convex closed set in `E`, and `f` is an
integrable function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the expected value of `f` belongs to `s`:
`∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s`. See also `convex.sum_mem` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex.integral_mem [is_probability_measure μ] (hs : convex ℝ s) (hsc : is_closed s)
(hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s :=
begin
borelize E,
rcases hfi.ae_strongly_measurable with ⟨g, hgm, hfg⟩,
haveI : separable_space (range g ∩ s : set E) :=
(hgm.is_separable_range.mono (inter_subset_left _ _)).separable_space,
obtain ⟨y₀, h₀⟩ : (range g ∩ s).nonempty,
{ rcases (hf.and hfg).exists with ⟨x₀, h₀⟩,
exact ⟨f x₀, by simp only [h₀.2, mem_range_self], h₀.1⟩ },
rw [integral_congr_ae hfg], rw [integrable_congr hfg] at hfi,
have hg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x ∈ closure (range g ∩ s),
{ filter_upwards [hfg.rw (λ x y, y ∈ s) hf] with x hx,
apply subset_closure,
exact ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩ },
set G : ℕ → simple_func α E := simple_func.approx_on _ hgm.measurable (range g ∩ s) y₀ h₀,
have : tendsto (λ n, (G n).integral μ) at_top (𝓝 $ ∫ x, g x ∂μ),
from tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable hfi _ hg _ (integrable_const _),
refine hsc.mem_of_tendsto this (eventually_of_forall $ λ n, hs.sum_mem _ _ _),
{ exact λ _ _, ennreal.to_real_nonneg },
{ rw [← ennreal.to_real_sum, (G n).sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton, measure_univ,
ennreal.one_to_real],
exact λ _ _, measure_ne_top _ _ },
{ simp only [simple_func.mem_range, forall_range_iff],
assume x,
apply inter_subset_right (range g),
exact simple_func.approx_on_mem hgm.measurable _ _ _ },
end
/-- If `μ` is a non-zero finite measure on `α`, `s` is a convex closed set in `E`, and `f` is an
integrable function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the average value of `f` belongs to `s`:
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s`. See also `convex.center_mass_mem` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex.average_mem [is_finite_measure μ] (hs : convex ℝ s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hμ : μ ≠ 0)
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s :=
begin
haveI : is_probability_measure ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ),
from is_probability_measure_smul hμ,
refine hs.integral_mem hsc (ae_mono' _ hfs) hfi.to_average,
exact absolutely_continuous.smul (refl _) _
end
/-- If `μ` is a non-zero finite measure on `α`, `s` is a convex closed set in `E`, and `f` is an
integrable function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the average value of `f` belongs to `s`:
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s`. See also `convex.center_mass_mem` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex.set_average_mem (hs : convex ℝ s) (hsc : is_closed s) (h0 : μ t ≠ 0) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞)
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable_on f t μ) :
⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ ∈ s :=
begin
haveI : fact (μ t < ∞) := ⟨ht.lt_top⟩,
refine hs.average_mem hsc _ hfs hfi,
rwa [ne.def, restrict_eq_zero]
end
/-- If `μ` is a non-zero finite measure on `α`, `s` is a convex set in `E`, and `f` is an integrable
function sending `μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the average value of `f` belongs to `closure s`:
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ s`. See also `convex.center_mass_mem` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex.set_average_mem_closure (hs : convex ℝ s) (h0 : μ t ≠ 0) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞)
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable_on f t μ) :
⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ ∈ closure s :=
hs.closure.set_average_mem is_closed_closure h0 ht (hfs.mono $ λ x hx, subset_closure hx) hfi
lemma convex_on.average_mem_epigraph [is_finite_measure μ] (hg : convex_on ℝ s g)
(hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s)
(hfi : integrable f μ) (hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
(⨍ x, f x ∂μ, ⨍ x, g (f x) ∂μ) ∈ {p : E × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ g p.1 ≤ p.2} :=
have ht_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (f x, g (f x)) ∈ {p : E × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ g p.1 ≤ p.2},
from hfs.mono (λ x hx, ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩),
by simpa only [average_pair hfi hgi]
using hg.convex_epigraph.average_mem (hsc.epigraph hgc) hμ ht_mem (hfi.prod_mk hgi)
lemma concave_on.average_mem_hypograph [is_finite_measure μ] (hg : concave_on ℝ s g)
(hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s)
(hfi : integrable f μ) (hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
(⨍ x, f x ∂μ, ⨍ x, g (f x) ∂μ) ∈ {p : E × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ g p.1} :=
by simpa only [mem_set_of_eq, pi.neg_apply, average_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
using hg.neg.average_mem_epigraph hgc.neg hsc hμ hfs hfi hgi.neg
/-- **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is convex and continuous on a convex closed
set `s`, `μ` is a finite non-zero measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending
`μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the value of `g` at the average value of `f` is less than or equal to
the average value of `g ∘ f` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are integrable. See also
`convex_on.map_center_mass_le` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex_on.map_average_le [is_finite_measure μ] (hg : convex_on ℝ s g)
(hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s)
(hfi : integrable f μ) (hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
g (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) ≤ ⨍ x, g (f x) ∂μ :=
(hg.average_mem_epigraph hgc hsc hμ hfs hfi hgi).2
/-- **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is concave and continuous on a convex closed
set `s`, `μ` is a finite non-zero measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending
`μ`-a.e. points to `s`, then the average value of `g ∘ f` is less than or equal to the value of `g`
at the average value of `f` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are integrable. See also
`concave_on.le_map_center_mass` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma concave_on.le_map_average [is_finite_measure μ] (hg : concave_on ℝ s g)
(hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s)
(hfi : integrable f μ) (hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
⨍ x, g (f x) ∂μ ≤ g (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) :=
(hg.average_mem_hypograph hgc hsc hμ hfs hfi hgi).2
/-- **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is convex and continuous on a convex closed
set `s`, `μ` is a finite non-zero measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending
`μ`-a.e. points of a set `t` to `s`, then the value of `g` at the average value of `f` over `t` is
less than or equal to the average value of `g ∘ f` over `t` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are
integrable. -/
lemma convex_on.set_average_mem_epigraph (hg : convex_on ℝ s g) (hgc : continuous_on g s)
(hsc : is_closed s) (h0 : μ t ≠ 0) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, f x ∈ s)
(hfi : integrable_on f t μ) (hgi : integrable_on (g ∘ f) t μ) :
(⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ, ⨍ x in t, g (f x) ∂μ) ∈ {p : E × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ g p.1 ≤ p.2} :=
begin
haveI : fact (μ t < ∞) := ⟨ht.lt_top⟩,
refine hg.average_mem_epigraph hgc hsc _ hfs hfi hgi,
rwa [ne.def, restrict_eq_zero]
end
/-- **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is concave and continuous on a convex closed
set `s`, `μ` is a finite non-zero measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending
`μ`-a.e. points of a set `t` to `s`, then the average value of `g ∘ f` over `t` is less than or
equal to the value of `g` at the average value of `f` over `t` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f`
are integrable. -/
lemma concave_on.set_average_mem_hypograph (hg : concave_on ℝ s g) (hgc : continuous_on g s)
(hsc : is_closed s) (h0 : μ t ≠ 0) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, f x ∈ s)
(hfi : integrable_on f t μ) (hgi : integrable_on (g ∘ f) t μ) :
(⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ, ⨍ x in t, g (f x) ∂μ) ∈ {p : E × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ g p.1} :=
by simpa only [mem_set_of_eq, pi.neg_apply, average_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
using hg.neg.set_average_mem_epigraph hgc.neg hsc h0 ht hfs hfi hgi.neg
/-- **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is convex and continuous on a convex closed
set `s`, `μ` is a finite non-zero measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending
`μ`-a.e. points of a set `t` to `s`, then the value of `g` at the average value of `f` over `t` is
less than or equal to the average value of `g ∘ f` over `t` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are
integrable. -/
lemma convex_on.map_set_average_le (hg : convex_on ℝ s g) (hgc : continuous_on g s)
(hsc : is_closed s) (h0 : μ t ≠ 0) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, f x ∈ s)
(hfi : integrable_on f t μ) (hgi : integrable_on (g ∘ f) t μ) :
g (⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ) ≤ ⨍ x in t, g (f x) ∂μ :=
(hg.set_average_mem_epigraph hgc hsc h0 ht hfs hfi hgi).2
/-- **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is concave and continuous on a convex closed
set `s`, `μ` is a finite non-zero measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending
`μ`-a.e. points of a set `t` to `s`, then the average value of `g ∘ f` over `t` is less than or
equal to the value of `g` at the average value of `f` over `t` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f`
are integrable. -/
lemma concave_on.le_map_set_average (hg : concave_on ℝ s g) (hgc : continuous_on g s)
(hsc : is_closed s) (h0 : μ t ≠ 0) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, f x ∈ s)
(hfi : integrable_on f t μ) (hgi : integrable_on (g ∘ f) t μ) :
⨍ x in t, g (f x) ∂μ ≤ g (⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ) :=
(hg.set_average_mem_hypograph hgc hsc h0 ht hfs hfi hgi).2
/-- **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is convex and continuous on a convex closed
set `s`, `μ` is a probability measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending `μ`-a.e. points
to `s`, then the value of `g` at the expected value of `f` is less than or equal to the expected
value of `g ∘ f` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are integrable. See also
`convex_on.map_center_mass_le` for a finite sum version of this lemma. -/
lemma convex_on.map_integral_le [is_probability_measure μ] (hg : convex_on ℝ s g)
(hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ)
(hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
g (∫ x, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ :=
by simpa only [average_eq_integral]
using hg.map_average_le hgc hsc (is_probability_measure.ne_zero μ) hfs hfi hgi
/-- **Jensen's inequality**: if a function `g : E → ℝ` is concave and continuous on a convex closed
set `s`, `μ` is a probability measure on `α`, and `f : α → E` is a function sending `μ`-a.e. points
to `s`, then the expected value of `g ∘ f` is less than or equal to the value of `g` at the expected
value of `f` provided that both `f` and `g ∘ f` are integrable. -/
lemma concave_on.le_map_integral [is_probability_measure μ] (hg : concave_on ℝ s g)
(hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ)
(hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ ≤ g (∫ x, f x ∂μ) :=
by simpa only [average_eq_integral]
using hg.le_map_average hgc hsc (is_probability_measure.ne_zero μ) hfs hfi hgi
/-!
### Strict Jensen's inequality
-/
/-- If `f : α → E` is an integrable function, then either it is a.e. equal to the constant
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ` or there exists a measurable set such that `μ t ≠ 0`, `μ tᶜ ≠ 0`, and the average
values of `f` over `t` and `tᶜ` are different. -/
lemma ae_eq_const_or_exists_average_ne_compl [is_finite_measure μ] (hfi : integrable f μ) :
(f =ᵐ[μ] const α (⨍ x, f x ∂μ)) ∨ ∃ t, measurable_set t ∧ μ t ≠ 0 ∧ μ tᶜ ≠ 0 ∧
⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ ≠ ⨍ x in tᶜ, f x ∂μ :=
begin
refine or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr (λ H, _), push_neg at H,
refine hfi.ae_eq_of_forall_set_integral_eq _ _ (integrable_const _) (λ t ht ht', _), clear ht',
simp only [const_apply, set_integral_const],
by_cases h₀ : μ t = 0,
{ rw [restrict_eq_zero.2 h₀, integral_zero_measure, h₀, ennreal.zero_to_real, zero_smul] },
by_cases h₀' : μ tᶜ = 0,
{ rw ← ae_eq_univ at h₀',
rw [restrict_congr_set h₀', restrict_univ, measure_congr h₀', measure_smul_average] },
have := average_mem_open_segment_compl_self ht.null_measurable_set h₀ h₀' hfi,
rw [← H t ht h₀ h₀', open_segment_same, mem_singleton_iff] at this,
rw [this, measure_smul_set_average _ (measure_ne_top μ _)]
end
/-- If an integrable function `f : α → E` takes values in a convex set `s` and for some set `t` of
positive measure, the average value of `f` over `t` belongs to the interior of `s`, then the average
of `f` over the whole space belongs to the interior of `s`. -/
lemma convex.average_mem_interior_of_set [is_finite_measure μ] (hs : convex ℝ s) (h0 : μ t ≠ 0)
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) (ht : ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ ∈ interior s) :
⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ interior s :=
begin
rw ← measure_to_measurable at h0, rw ← restrict_to_measurable (measure_ne_top μ t) at ht,
by_cases h0' : μ (to_measurable μ t)ᶜ = 0,
{ rw ← ae_eq_univ at h0',
rwa [restrict_congr_set h0', restrict_univ] at ht },
exact hs.open_segment_interior_closure_subset_interior ht
(hs.set_average_mem_closure h0' (measure_ne_top _ _) (ae_restrict_of_ae hfs) hfi.integrable_on)
(average_mem_open_segment_compl_self (measurable_set_to_measurable μ t).null_measurable_set
h0 h0' hfi)
end
/-- If an integrable function `f : α → E` takes values in a strictly convex closed set `s`, then
either it is a.e. equal to its average value, or its average value belongs to the interior of
`s`. -/
lemma strict_convex.ae_eq_const_or_average_mem_interior [is_finite_measure μ]
(hs : strict_convex ℝ s) (hsc : is_closed s) (hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] const α (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) ∨ ⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ interior s :=
begin
have : ∀ {t}, μ t ≠ 0 → ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ ∈ s,
from λ t ht, hs.convex.set_average_mem hsc ht (measure_ne_top _ _) (ae_restrict_of_ae hfs)
hfi.integrable_on,
refine (ae_eq_const_or_exists_average_ne_compl hfi).imp_right _,
rintro ⟨t, hm, h₀, h₀', hne⟩,
exact hs.open_segment_subset (this h₀) (this h₀') hne
(average_mem_open_segment_compl_self hm.null_measurable_set h₀ h₀' hfi)
end
/-- **Jensen's inequality**, strict version: if an integrable function `f : α → E` takes values in a
convex closed set `s`, and `g : E → ℝ` is continuous and strictly convex on `s`, then
either `f` is a.e. equal to its average value, or `g (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) < ⨍ x, g (f x) ∂μ`. -/
lemma strict_convex_on.ae_eq_const_or_map_average_lt [is_finite_measure μ]
(hg : strict_convex_on ℝ s g) (hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s)
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) (hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] const α (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) ∨ g (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) < ⨍ x, g (f x) ∂μ :=
begin
have : ∀ {t}, μ t ≠ 0 → ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ ∈ s ∧ g (⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ) ≤ ⨍ x in t, g (f x) ∂μ,
from λ t ht, hg.convex_on.set_average_mem_epigraph hgc hsc ht (measure_ne_top _ _)
(ae_restrict_of_ae hfs) hfi.integrable_on hgi.integrable_on,
refine (ae_eq_const_or_exists_average_ne_compl hfi).imp_right _,
rintro ⟨t, hm, h₀, h₀', hne⟩,
rcases average_mem_open_segment_compl_self hm.null_measurable_set h₀ h₀' (hfi.prod_mk hgi)
with ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, h_avg⟩,
simp only [average_pair hfi hgi, average_pair hfi.integrable_on hgi.integrable_on, prod.smul_mk,
prod.mk_add_mk, prod.mk.inj_iff, (∘)] at h_avg,
rw [← h_avg.1, ← h_avg.2],
calc g (a • ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ + b • ⨍ x in tᶜ, f x ∂μ)
< a * g (⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ) + b * g (⨍ x in tᶜ, f x ∂μ) :
hg.2 (this h₀).1 (this h₀').1 hne ha hb hab
... ≤ a * ⨍ x in t, g (f x) ∂μ + b * ⨍ x in tᶜ, g (f x) ∂μ :
add_le_add (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (this h₀).2 ha.le)
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (this h₀').2 hb.le)
end
/-- **Jensen's inequality**, strict version: if an integrable function `f : α → E` takes values in a
convex closed set `s`, and `g : E → ℝ` is continuous and strictly concave on `s`, then
either `f` is a.e. equal to its average value, or `⨍ x, g (f x) ∂μ < g (⨍ x, f x ∂μ)`. -/
lemma strict_concave_on.ae_eq_const_or_lt_map_average [is_finite_measure μ]
(hg : strict_concave_on ℝ s g) (hgc : continuous_on g s) (hsc : is_closed s)
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : integrable f μ) (hgi : integrable (g ∘ f) μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] const α (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) ∨ ⨍ x, g (f x) ∂μ < g (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) :=
by simpa only [pi.neg_apply, average_neg, neg_lt_neg_iff]
using hg.neg.ae_eq_const_or_map_average_lt hgc.neg hsc hfs hfi hgi.neg
/-- If `E` is a strictly convex normed space and `f : α → E` is a function such that `‖f x‖ ≤ C`
a.e., then either this function is a.e. equal to its average value, or the norm of its average value
is strictly less than `C`. -/
lemma ae_eq_const_or_norm_average_lt_of_norm_le_const [strict_convex_space ℝ E]
(h_le : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
(f =ᵐ[μ] const α ⨍ x, f x ∂μ) ∨ ‖⨍ x, f x ∂μ‖ < C :=
begin
cases le_or_lt C 0 with hC0 hC0,
{ have : f =ᵐ[μ] 0, from h_le.mono (λ x hx, norm_le_zero_iff.1 (hx.trans hC0)),
simp only [average_congr this, pi.zero_apply, average_zero],
exact or.inl this },
by_cases hfi : integrable f μ, swap,
by simp [average_eq, integral_undef hfi, hC0, ennreal.to_real_pos_iff],
cases (le_top : μ univ ≤ ∞).eq_or_lt with hμt hμt, { simp [average_eq, hμt, hC0] },
haveI : is_finite_measure μ := ⟨hμt⟩,
replace h_le : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closed_ball (0 : E) C, by simpa only [mem_closed_ball_zero_iff],
simpa only [interior_closed_ball _ hC0.ne', mem_ball_zero_iff]
using (strict_convex_closed_ball ℝ (0 : E) C).ae_eq_const_or_average_mem_interior
is_closed_ball h_le hfi
end
/-- If `E` is a strictly convex normed space and `f : α → E` is a function such that `‖f x‖ ≤ C`
a.e., then either this function is a.e. equal to its average value, or the norm of its integral is
strictly less than `(μ univ).to_real * C`. -/
lemma ae_eq_const_or_norm_integral_lt_of_norm_le_const [strict_convex_space ℝ E]
[is_finite_measure μ] (h_le : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
(f =ᵐ[μ] const α ⨍ x, f x ∂μ) ∨ ‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ < (μ univ).to_real * C :=
begin
cases eq_or_ne μ 0 with h₀ h₀, { left, simp [h₀] },
have hμ : 0 < (μ univ).to_real,
by simp [ennreal.to_real_pos_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero, h₀, measure_lt_top],
refine (ae_eq_const_or_norm_average_lt_of_norm_le_const h_le).imp_right (λ H, _),
rwa [average_eq, norm_smul, norm_inv, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos hμ,
← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff' hμ] at H
end
/-- If `E` is a strictly convex normed space and `f : α → E` is a function such that `‖f x‖ ≤ C`
a.e. on a set `t` of finite measure, then either this function is a.e. equal to its average value on
`t`, or the norm of its integral over `t` is strictly less than `(μ t).to_real * C`. -/
lemma ae_eq_const_or_norm_set_integral_lt_of_norm_le_const [strict_convex_space ℝ E]
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_le : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
(f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] const α ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ) ∨ ‖∫ x in t, f x ∂μ‖ < (μ t).to_real * C :=
begin
haveI := fact.mk ht.lt_top,
rw [← restrict_apply_univ],
exact ae_eq_const_or_norm_integral_lt_of_norm_le_const h_le
end
|
6c9c13d443db02797fc372b9d42a1af761a7bd22 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/number_theory/ADE_inequality.lean | 67760b10cddb92b1da5f335922bfd2e67e9f603b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,631 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import data.multiset.sort
import data.pnat.interval
import data.rat.order
import data.pnat.basic
import tactic.norm_num
import tactic.field_simp
import tactic.interval_cases
/-!
# The inequality `p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ > 1`
In this file we classify solutions to the inequality
`(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1`, for positive natural numbers `p`, `q`, and `r`.
The solutions are exactly of the form.
* `A' q r := {1,q,r}`
* `D' r := {2,2,r}`
* `E6 := {2,3,3}`, or `E7 := {2,3,4}`, or `E8 := {2,3,5}`
This inequality shows up in Lie theory,
in the classification of Dynkin diagrams, root systems, and semisimple Lie algebras.
## Main declarations
* `pqr.A' q r`, the multiset `{1,q,r}`
* `pqr.D' r`, the multiset `{2,2,r}`
* `pqr.E6`, the multiset `{2,3,3}`
* `pqr.E7`, the multiset `{2,3,4}`
* `pqr.E8`, the multiset `{2,3,5}`
* `pqr.classification`, the classification of solutions to `p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ > 1`
-/
namespace ADE_inequality
open multiset
/-- `A' q r := {1,q,r}` is a `multiset ℕ+`
that is a solution to the inequality
`(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1`. -/
def A' (q r : ℕ+) : multiset ℕ+ := {1,q,r}
/-- `A r := {1,1,r}` is a `multiset ℕ+`
that is a solution to the inequality
`(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1`.
These solutions are related to the Dynkin diagrams $A_r$. -/
def A (r : ℕ+) : multiset ℕ+ := A' 1 r
/-- `D' r := {2,2,r}` is a `multiset ℕ+`
that is a solution to the inequality
`(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1`.
These solutions are related to the Dynkin diagrams $D_{r+2}$. -/
def D' (r : ℕ+) : multiset ℕ+ := {2,2,r}
/-- `E' r := {2,3,r}` is a `multiset ℕ+`.
For `r ∈ {3,4,5}` is a solution to the inequality
`(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1`.
These solutions are related to the Dynkin diagrams $E_{r+3}$. -/
def E' (r : ℕ+) : multiset ℕ+ := {2,3,r}
/-- `E6 := {2,3,3}` is a `multiset ℕ+`
that is a solution to the inequality
`(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1`.
This solution is related to the Dynkin diagrams $E_6$. -/
def E6 : multiset ℕ+ := E' 3
/-- `E7 := {2,3,4}` is a `multiset ℕ+`
that is a solution to the inequality
`(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1`.
This solution is related to the Dynkin diagrams $E_7$. -/
def E7 : multiset ℕ+ := E' 4
/-- `E8 := {2,3,5}` is a `multiset ℕ+`
that is a solution to the inequality
`(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1`.
This solution is related to the Dynkin diagrams $E_8$. -/
def E8 : multiset ℕ+ := E' 5
/-- `sum_inv pqr` for a `pqr : multiset ℕ+` is the sum of the inverses
of the elements of `pqr`, as rational number.
The intended argument is a multiset `{p,q,r}` of cardinality `3`. -/
def sum_inv (pqr : multiset ℕ+) : ℚ :=
multiset.sum $ pqr.map $ λ x, x⁻¹
lemma sum_inv_pqr (p q r : ℕ+) : sum_inv {p,q,r} = p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ :=
by simp only [sum_inv, coe_coe, add_zero, insert_eq_cons, add_assoc,
map_cons, sum_cons, map_singleton, sum_singleton]
/-- A multiset `pqr` of positive natural numbers is `admissible`
if it is equal to `A' q r`, or `D' r`, or one of `E6`, `E7`, or `E8`. -/
def admissible (pqr : multiset ℕ+) : Prop :=
(∃ q r, A' q r = pqr) ∨ (∃ r, D' r = pqr) ∨ (E' 3 = pqr ∨ E' 4 = pqr ∨ E' 5 = pqr)
lemma admissible_A' (q r : ℕ+) : admissible (A' q r) := or.inl ⟨q, r, rfl⟩
lemma admissible_D' (n : ℕ+) : admissible (D' n) := or.inr $ or.inl ⟨n, rfl⟩
lemma admissible_E'3 : admissible (E' 3) := or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inl rfl
lemma admissible_E'4 : admissible (E' 4) := or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inl rfl
lemma admissible_E'5 : admissible (E' 5) := or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr rfl
lemma admissible_E6 : admissible (E6) := admissible_E'3
lemma admissible_E7 : admissible (E7) := admissible_E'4
lemma admissible_E8 : admissible (E8) := admissible_E'5
lemma admissible.one_lt_sum_inv {pqr : multiset ℕ+} :
admissible pqr → 1 < sum_inv pqr :=
begin
rw [admissible],
rintro (⟨p', q', H⟩|⟨n, H⟩|H|H|H),
{ rw [← H, A', sum_inv_pqr, add_assoc],
simp only [lt_add_iff_pos_right, pnat.one_coe, inv_one, nat.cast_one, coe_coe],
apply add_pos; simp only [pnat.pos, nat.cast_pos, inv_pos] },
{ rw [← H, D', sum_inv_pqr],
simp only [lt_add_iff_pos_right, pnat.one_coe, inv_one, nat.cast_one,
coe_coe, pnat.coe_bit0, nat.cast_bit0],
norm_num },
all_goals { rw [← H, E', sum_inv_pqr], norm_num }
end
lemma lt_three {p q r : ℕ+} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hqr : q ≤ r) (H : 1 < sum_inv {p, q, r}) :
p < 3 :=
begin
have h3 : (0:ℚ) < 3, by norm_num,
contrapose! H, rw sum_inv_pqr,
have h3q := H.trans hpq,
have h3r := h3q.trans hqr,
calc (p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) ≤ 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ : add_le_add (add_le_add _ _) _
... = 1 : by norm_num,
all_goals { rw inv_le_inv _ h3; [assumption_mod_cast, norm_num] }
end
lemma lt_four {q r : ℕ+} (hqr : q ≤ r) (H : 1 < sum_inv {2, q, r}) :
q < 4 :=
begin
have h4 : (0:ℚ) < 4, by norm_num,
contrapose! H, rw sum_inv_pqr,
have h4r := H.trans hqr,
simp only [pnat.coe_bit0, nat.cast_bit0, pnat.one_coe, nat.cast_one, coe_coe],
calc (2⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) ≤ 2⁻¹ + 4⁻¹ + 4⁻¹ : add_le_add (add_le_add le_rfl _) _
... = 1 : by norm_num,
all_goals { rw inv_le_inv _ h4; [assumption_mod_cast, norm_num] }
end
lemma lt_six {r : ℕ+} (H : 1 < sum_inv {2, 3, r}) :
r < 6 :=
begin
have h6 : (0:ℚ) < 6, by norm_num,
contrapose! H, rw sum_inv_pqr,
simp only [pnat.coe_bit0, nat.cast_bit0, pnat.one_coe, nat.cast_bit1, nat.cast_one,
pnat.coe_bit1, coe_coe],
calc (2⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) ≤ 2⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + 6⁻¹ : add_le_add (add_le_add le_rfl le_rfl) _
... = 1 : by norm_num,
rw inv_le_inv _ h6; [assumption_mod_cast, norm_num]
end
lemma admissible_of_one_lt_sum_inv_aux' {p q r : ℕ+} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hqr : q ≤ r)
(H : 1 < sum_inv {p,q,r}) :
admissible {p,q,r} :=
begin
have hp3 : p < 3 := lt_three hpq hqr H,
interval_cases p,
{ exact admissible_A' q r },
have hq4 : q < 4 := lt_four hqr H,
interval_cases q,
{ exact admissible_D' r },
have hr6 : r < 6 := lt_six H,
interval_cases r,
{ exact admissible_E6 },
{ exact admissible_E7 },
{ exact admissible_E8 }
end
lemma admissible_of_one_lt_sum_inv_aux :
∀ {pqr : list ℕ+} (hs : pqr.sorted (≤)) (hl : pqr.length = 3) (H : 1 < sum_inv pqr),
admissible pqr
| [p,q,r] hs hl H :=
begin
obtain ⟨⟨hpq, -⟩, hqr⟩ : (p ≤ q ∧ p ≤ r) ∧ q ≤ r,
simpa using hs,
exact admissible_of_one_lt_sum_inv_aux' hpq hqr H,
end
lemma admissible_of_one_lt_sum_inv {p q r : ℕ+} (H : 1 < sum_inv {p,q,r}) :
admissible {p,q,r} :=
begin
simp only [admissible],
let S := sort ((≤) : ℕ+ → ℕ+ → Prop) {p,q,r},
have hS : S.sorted (≤) := sort_sorted _ _,
have hpqr : ({p,q,r} : multiset ℕ+) = S := (sort_eq has_le.le {p, q, r}).symm,
simp only [hpqr] at *,
apply admissible_of_one_lt_sum_inv_aux hS _ H,
simp only [S, length_sort],
dec_trivial,
end
/-- A multiset `{p,q,r}` of positive natural numbers
is a solution to `(p⁻¹ + q⁻¹ + r⁻¹ : ℚ) > 1` if and only if
it is `admissible` which means it is one of:
* `A' q r := {1,q,r}`
* `D' r := {2,2,r}`
* `E6 := {2,3,3}`, or `E7 := {2,3,4}`, or `E8 := {2,3,5}`
-/
lemma classification (p q r : ℕ+) :
1 < sum_inv {p,q,r} ↔ admissible {p,q,r} :=
⟨admissible_of_one_lt_sum_inv, admissible.one_lt_sum_inv⟩
end ADE_inequality
|
7b18adb4592222802bb0be260e237524da5d0d31 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/geometry/manifold/local_invariant_properties.lean | 4e3a8114291bf76909a5c5ebf37f4f4f9727721c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 28,339 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import geometry.manifold.charted_space
/-!
# Local properties invariant under a groupoid
We study properties of a triple `(g, s, x)` where `g` is a function between two spaces `H` and `H'`,
`s` is a subset of `H` and `x` is a point of `H`. Our goal is to register how such a property
should behave to make sense in charted spaces modelled on `H` and `H'`.
The main examples we have in mind are the properties "`g` is differentiable at `x` within `s`", or
"`g` is smooth at `x` within `s`". We want to develop general results that, when applied in these
specific situations, say that the notion of smooth function in a manifold behaves well under
restriction, intersection, is local, and so on.
## Main definitions
* `local_invariant_prop G G' P` says that a property `P` of a triple `(g, s, x)` is local, and
invariant under composition by elements of the groupoids `G` and `G'` of `H` and `H'`
respectively.
* `charted_space.lift_prop_within_at` (resp. `lift_prop_at`, `lift_prop_on` and `lift_prop`):
given a property `P` of `(g, s, x)` where `g : H → H'`, define the corresponding property
for functions `M → M'` where `M` and `M'` are charted spaces modelled respectively on `H` and
`H'`. We define these properties within a set at a point, or at a point, or on a set, or in the
whole space. This lifting process (obtained by restricting to suitable chart domains) can always
be done, but it only behaves well under locality and invariance assumptions.
Given `hG : local_invariant_prop G G' P`, we deduce many properties of the lifted property on the
charted spaces. For instance, `hG.lift_prop_within_at_inter` says that `P g s x` is equivalent to
`P g (s ∩ t) x` whenever `t` is a neighborhood of `x`.
## Implementation notes
We do not use dot notation for properties of the lifted property. For instance, we have
`hG.lift_prop_within_at_congr` saying that if `lift_prop_within_at P g s x` holds, and `g` and `g'`
coincide on `s`, then `lift_prop_within_at P g' s x` holds. We can't call it
`lift_prop_within_at.congr` as it is in the namespace associated to `local_invariant_prop`, not
in the one for `lift_prop_within_at`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical manifold topological_space
open set filter
variables {H M H' M' X : Type*}
variables [topological_space H] [topological_space M] [charted_space H M]
variables [topological_space H'] [topological_space M'] [charted_space H' M']
variables [topological_space X]
namespace structure_groupoid
variables (G : structure_groupoid H) (G' : structure_groupoid H')
/-- Structure recording good behavior of a property of a triple `(f, s, x)` where `f` is a function,
`s` a set and `x` a point. Good behavior here means locality and invariance under given groupoids
(both in the source and in the target). Given such a good behavior, the lift of this property
to charted spaces admitting these groupoids will inherit the good behavior. -/
structure local_invariant_prop (P : (H → H') → (set H) → H → Prop) : Prop :=
(is_local : ∀ {s x u} {f : H → H'}, is_open u → x ∈ u → (P f s x ↔ P f (s ∩ u) x))
(right_invariance' : ∀ {s x f} {e : local_homeomorph H H}, e ∈ G → x ∈ e.source → P f s x →
P (f ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x))
(congr_of_forall : ∀ {s x} {f g : H → H'}, (∀ y ∈ s, f y = g y) → f x = g x → P f s x → P g s x)
(left_invariance' : ∀ {s x f} {e' : local_homeomorph H' H'}, e' ∈ G' → s ⊆ f ⁻¹' e'.source →
f x ∈ e'.source → P f s x → P (e' ∘ f) s x)
variables {G G'} {P : (H → H') → (set H) → H → Prop} {s t u : set H} {x : H}
variable (hG : G.local_invariant_prop G' P)
include hG
namespace local_invariant_prop
lemma congr_set {s t : set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} (hu : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
P f s x ↔ P f t x :=
begin
obtain ⟨o, host, ho, hxo⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp hu.mem_iff,
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_set_of, ← and.congr_left_iff, ← mem_inter_iff, ← set.ext_iff] at host,
rw [hG.is_local ho hxo, host, ← hG.is_local ho hxo]
end
lemma is_local_nhds {s u : set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
P f s x ↔ P f (s ∩ u) x :=
hG.congr_set $ mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually_eq.mp hu
lemma congr_iff_nhds_within {s : set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g)
(h2 : f x = g x) : P f s x ↔ P g s x :=
by { simp_rw [hG.is_local_nhds h1],
exact ⟨hG.congr_of_forall (λ y hy, hy.2) h2, hG.congr_of_forall (λ y hy, hy.2.symm) h2.symm⟩ }
lemma congr_nhds_within {s : set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h2 : f x = g x)
(hP : P f s x) : P g s x :=
(hG.congr_iff_nhds_within h1 h2).mp hP
lemma congr_nhds_within' {s : set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h2 : f x = g x)
(hP : P g s x) : P f s x :=
(hG.congr_iff_nhds_within h1 h2).mpr hP
lemma congr_iff {s : set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : P f s x ↔ P g s x :=
hG.congr_iff_nhds_within (mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds h) (mem_of_mem_nhds h : _)
lemma congr {s : set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) (hP : P f s x) : P g s x :=
(hG.congr_iff h).mp hP
lemma congr' {s : set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) (hP : P g s x) : P f s x :=
hG.congr h.symm hP
lemma left_invariance {s : set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} {e' : local_homeomorph H' H'}
(he' : e' ∈ G') (hfs : continuous_within_at f s x) (hxe' : f x ∈ e'.source) :
P (e' ∘ f) s x ↔ P f s x :=
begin
have h2f := hfs.preimage_mem_nhds_within (e'.open_source.mem_nhds hxe'),
have h3f := (((e'.continuous_at hxe').comp_continuous_within_at hfs).preimage_mem_nhds_within $
e'.symm.open_source.mem_nhds $ e'.maps_to hxe'),
split,
{ intro h,
rw [hG.is_local_nhds h3f] at h,
have h2 := hG.left_invariance' (G'.symm he') (inter_subset_right _ _)
(by exact e'.maps_to hxe') h,
rw [← hG.is_local_nhds h3f] at h2,
refine hG.congr_nhds_within _ (e'.left_inv hxe') h2,
exact eventually_of_mem h2f (λ x', e'.left_inv) },
{ simp_rw [hG.is_local_nhds h2f],
exact hG.left_invariance' he' (inter_subset_right _ _) hxe' }
end
lemma right_invariance {s : set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} {e : local_homeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (hxe : x ∈ e.source) : P (f ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P f s x :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, hG.right_invariance' he hxe⟩,
have := hG.right_invariance' (G.symm he) (e.maps_to hxe) h,
rw [e.symm_symm, e.left_inv hxe] at this,
refine hG.congr _ ((hG.congr_set _).mp this),
{ refine eventually_of_mem (e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe) (λ x' hx', _),
simp_rw [function.comp_apply, e.left_inv hx'] },
{ rw [eventually_eq_set],
refine eventually_of_mem (e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe) (λ x' hx', _),
simp_rw [mem_preimage, e.left_inv hx'] },
end
end local_invariant_prop
end structure_groupoid
namespace charted_space
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property in a charted space, by requiring that it holds at the preferred chart at
this point. (When the property is local and invariant, it will in fact hold using any chart, see
`lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart`). We require continuity in the lifted property, as otherwise one
single chart might fail to capture the behavior of the function.
-/
def lift_prop_within_at (P : (H → H') → set H → H → Prop)
(f : M → M') (s : set M) (x : M) : Prop :=
continuous_within_at f s x ∧
P (chart_at H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chart_at H x).symm) ((chart_at H x).symm ⁻¹' s) (chart_at H x x)
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of functions on sets in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
around each point of the set, in the preferred charts. -/
def lift_prop_on (P : (H → H') → set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (s : set M) :=
∀ x ∈ s, lift_prop_within_at P f s x
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of a function at a point in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
in the preferred chart. -/
def lift_prop_at (P : (H → H') → set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (x : M) :=
lift_prop_within_at P f univ x
lemma lift_prop_at_iff {P : (H → H') → set H → H → Prop} {f : M → M'} {x : M} :
lift_prop_at P f x ↔ continuous_at f x ∧
P (chart_at H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chart_at H x).symm) univ (chart_at H x x) :=
by rw [lift_prop_at, lift_prop_within_at, continuous_within_at_univ, preimage_univ]
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of a function in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
in the preferred chart around every point. -/
def lift_prop (P : (H → H') → set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') :=
∀ x, lift_prop_at P f x
lemma lift_prop_iff {P : (H → H') → set H → H → Prop} {f : M → M'} :
lift_prop P f ↔ continuous f ∧
∀ x, P (chart_at H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chart_at H x).symm) univ (chart_at H x x) :=
by simp_rw [lift_prop, lift_prop_at_iff, forall_and_distrib, continuous_iff_continuous_at]
end charted_space
open charted_space
namespace structure_groupoid
variables {G : structure_groupoid H} {G' : structure_groupoid H'}
{e e' : local_homeomorph M H} {f f' : local_homeomorph M' H'}
{P : (H → H') → set H → H → Prop} {g g' : M → M'} {s t : set M} {x : M}
{Q : (H → H) → set H → H → Prop}
lemma lift_prop_within_at_univ : lift_prop_within_at P g univ x ↔ lift_prop_at P g x :=
iff.rfl
lemma lift_prop_on_univ : lift_prop_on P g univ ↔ lift_prop P g :=
by simp [lift_prop_on, lift_prop, lift_prop_at]
lemma lift_prop_within_at_self {f : H → H'} {s : set H} {x : H} :
lift_prop_within_at P f s x ↔ continuous_within_at f s x ∧ P f s x :=
iff.rfl
lemma lift_prop_within_at_self_source {f : H → M'} {s : set H} {x : H} :
lift_prop_within_at P f s x ↔ continuous_within_at f s x ∧ P (chart_at H' (f x) ∘ f) s x :=
iff.rfl
lemma lift_prop_within_at_self_target {f : M → H'} :
lift_prop_within_at P f s x ↔
continuous_within_at f s x ∧
P (f ∘ (chart_at H x).symm) ((chart_at H x).symm ⁻¹' s) (chart_at H x x) :=
iff.rfl
namespace local_invariant_prop
variable (hG : G.local_invariant_prop G' P)
include hG
/-- `lift_prop_within_at P f s x` is equivalent to a definition where we restrict the set we are
considering to the domain of the charts at `x` and `f x`. -/
lemma lift_prop_within_at_iff {f : M → M'} (hf : continuous_within_at f s x) :
lift_prop_within_at P f s x ↔
P ((chart_at H' (f x)) ∘ f ∘ (chart_at H x).symm)
((chart_at H x).target ∩ (chart_at H x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (chart_at H' (f x)).source))
(chart_at H x x) :=
begin
rw [lift_prop_within_at, iff_true_intro hf, true_and, hG.congr_set],
exact local_homeomorph.preimage_eventually_eq_target_inter_preimage_inter hf
(mem_chart_source H x) (chart_source_mem_nhds H' (f x))
end
lemma lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_source_aux (g : M → H')
(he : e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source)
(he' : e' ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (xe' : x ∈ e'.source) :
P (g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (g ∘ e'.symm) (e'.symm ⁻¹' s) (e' x) :=
begin
rw [← hG.right_invariance (compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas he he')],
swap, { simp only [xe, xe'] with mfld_simps },
simp_rw [local_homeomorph.trans_apply, e.left_inv xe],
rw [hG.congr_iff],
{ refine hG.congr_set _,
refine (eventually_of_mem _ $ λ y (hy : y ∈ e'.symm ⁻¹' e.source), _).set_eq,
{ refine (e'.symm.continuous_at $ e'.maps_to xe').preimage_mem_nhds (e.open_source.mem_nhds _),
simp_rw [e'.left_inv xe', xe] },
simp_rw [mem_preimage, local_homeomorph.coe_trans_symm, local_homeomorph.symm_symm,
function.comp_apply, e.left_inv hy] },
{ refine ((e'.eventually_nhds' _ xe').mpr $ e.eventually_left_inverse xe).mono (λ y hy, _),
simp only with mfld_simps,
rw [hy] },
end
lemma lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_target_aux2 (g : H → M') {x : H} {s : set H}
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source)
(hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf' : g x ∈ f'.source)
(hgs : continuous_within_at g s x) :
P (f ∘ g) s x ↔ P (f' ∘ g) s x :=
begin
have hcont : continuous_within_at (f ∘ g) s x :=
(f.continuous_at xf).comp_continuous_within_at hgs,
rw [← hG.left_invariance (compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas hf hf') hcont
(by simp only [xf, xf'] with mfld_simps)],
refine hG.congr_iff_nhds_within _ (by simp only [xf] with mfld_simps),
exact (hgs.eventually $ f.eventually_left_inverse xf).mono (λ y, congr_arg f')
end
lemma lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_target_aux {g : X → M'} {e : local_homeomorph X H} {x : X}
{s : set X} (xe : x ∈ e.source)
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source)
(hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf' : g x ∈ f'.source)
(hgs : continuous_within_at g s x) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (f' ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) :=
begin
rw [← e.left_inv xe] at xf xf' hgs,
refine hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_target_aux2 (g ∘ e.symm) hf xf hf' xf' _,
exact hgs.comp (e.symm.continuous_at $ e.maps_to xe).continuous_within_at subset.rfl
end
/-- If a property of a germ of function `g` on a pointed set `(s, x)` is invariant under the
structure groupoid (by composition in the source space and in the target space), then
expressing it in charted spaces does not depend on the element of the maximal atlas one uses
both in the source and in the target manifolds, provided they are defined around `x` and `g x`
respectively, and provided `g` is continuous within `s` at `x` (otherwise, the local behavior
of `g` at `x` can not be captured with a chart in the target). -/
lemma lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_aux
(he : e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source)
(he' : e' ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (xe' : x ∈ e'.source)
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source)
(hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf' : g x ∈ f'.source)
(hgs : continuous_within_at g s x) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (f' ∘ g ∘ e'.symm) (e'.symm ⁻¹' s) (e' x) :=
by rw [hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_source_aux (f ∘ g) he xe he' xe',
hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_target_aux xe' hf xf hf' xf' hgs]
lemma lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart [has_groupoid M G] [has_groupoid M' G']
(he : e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source)
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
lift_prop_within_at P g s x ↔
continuous_within_at g s x ∧ P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) :=
and_congr_right $ hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_aux (chart_mem_maximal_atlas _ _)
(mem_chart_source _ _) he xe (chart_mem_maximal_atlas _ _) (mem_chart_source _ _) hf xf
/-- A version of `lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart`, only for the source. -/
lemma lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_source [has_groupoid M G]
(he : e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source) :
lift_prop_within_at P g s x ↔ lift_prop_within_at P (g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) :=
begin
have := e.symm.continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_within_at_comp_right xe,
rw [e.symm_symm] at this,
rw [lift_prop_within_at_self_source, lift_prop_within_at, ← this],
simp_rw [function.comp_app, e.left_inv xe],
refine and_congr iff.rfl _,
rw hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_source_aux (chart_at H' (g x) ∘ g)
(chart_mem_maximal_atlas G x) (mem_chart_source H x) he xe,
end
/-- A version of `lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart`, only for the target. -/
lemma lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_target [has_groupoid M' G']
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
lift_prop_within_at P g s x ↔ continuous_within_at g s x ∧ lift_prop_within_at P (f ∘ g) s x :=
begin
rw [lift_prop_within_at_self_target, lift_prop_within_at, and.congr_right_iff],
intro hg,
simp_rw [(f.continuous_at xf).comp_continuous_within_at hg, true_and],
exact hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart_target_aux (mem_chart_source _ _)
(chart_mem_maximal_atlas _ _) (mem_chart_source _ _) hf xf hg
end
/-- A version of `lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart`, that uses `lift_prop_within_at` on both sides.
-/
lemma lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart' [has_groupoid M G] [has_groupoid M' G']
(he : e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source)
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
lift_prop_within_at P g s x ↔
continuous_within_at g s x ∧ lift_prop_within_at P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) :=
begin
rw [hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart he xe hf xf, lift_prop_within_at_self, and.left_comm,
iff.comm, and_iff_right_iff_imp],
intro h,
have h1 := (e.symm.continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_within_at_comp_right xe).mp h.1,
have : continuous_at f ((g ∘ e.symm) (e x)),
{ simp_rw [function.comp, e.left_inv xe, f.continuous_at xf] },
exact this.comp_continuous_within_at h1,
end
lemma lift_prop_on_indep_chart [has_groupoid M G] [has_groupoid M' G']
(he : e ∈ G.maximal_atlas M) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximal_atlas M') (h : lift_prop_on P g s)
{y : H} (hy : y ∈ e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ g ⁻¹' f.source)) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) y :=
begin
convert ((hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart he (e.symm_maps_to hy.1) hf hy.2.2).1
(h _ hy.2.1)).2,
rw [e.right_inv hy.1],
end
lemma lift_prop_within_at_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
lift_prop_within_at P g (s ∩ t) x ↔ lift_prop_within_at P g s x :=
begin
rw [lift_prop_within_at, lift_prop_within_at, continuous_within_at_inter' ht, hG.congr_set],
simp_rw [eventually_eq_set, mem_preimage,
(chart_at H x).eventually_nhds' (λ x, x ∈ s ∩ t ↔ x ∈ s) (mem_chart_source H x)],
exact (mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually_eq.mp ht).symm.mem_iff
end
lemma lift_prop_within_at_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
lift_prop_within_at P g (s ∩ t) x ↔ lift_prop_within_at P g s x :=
hG.lift_prop_within_at_inter' (mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds ht)
lemma lift_prop_at_of_lift_prop_within_at (h : lift_prop_within_at P g s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
lift_prop_at P g x :=
by rwa [← univ_inter s, hG.lift_prop_within_at_inter hs] at h
lemma lift_prop_within_at_of_lift_prop_at_of_mem_nhds (h : lift_prop_at P g x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
lift_prop_within_at P g s x :=
by rwa [← univ_inter s, hG.lift_prop_within_at_inter hs]
lemma lift_prop_on_of_locally_lift_prop_on
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, is_open u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ lift_prop_on P g (s ∩ u)) :
lift_prop_on P g s :=
begin
assume x hx,
rcases h x hx with ⟨u, u_open, xu, hu⟩,
have := hu x ⟨hx, xu⟩,
rwa hG.lift_prop_within_at_inter at this,
exact is_open.mem_nhds u_open xu,
end
lemma lift_prop_of_locally_lift_prop_on (h : ∀ x, ∃ u, is_open u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ lift_prop_on P g u) :
lift_prop P g :=
begin
rw ← lift_prop_on_univ,
apply hG.lift_prop_on_of_locally_lift_prop_on (λ x hx, _),
simp [h x],
end
lemma lift_prop_within_at_congr_of_eventually_eq
(h : lift_prop_within_at P g s x) (h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : g' x = g x) :
lift_prop_within_at P g' s x :=
begin
refine ⟨h.1.congr_of_eventually_eq h₁ hx, _⟩,
refine hG.congr_nhds_within' _ (by simp_rw [function.comp_apply,
(chart_at H x).left_inv (mem_chart_source H x), hx]) h.2,
simp_rw [eventually_eq, function.comp_app, (chart_at H x).eventually_nhds_within'
(λ y, chart_at H' (g' x) (g' y) = chart_at H' (g x) (g y))
(mem_chart_source H x)],
exact h₁.mono (λ y hy, by rw [hx, hy])
end
lemma lift_prop_within_at_congr_iff_of_eventually_eq (h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : g' x = g x) :
lift_prop_within_at P g' s x ↔ lift_prop_within_at P g s x :=
⟨λ h, hG.lift_prop_within_at_congr_of_eventually_eq h h₁.symm hx.symm,
λ h, hG.lift_prop_within_at_congr_of_eventually_eq h h₁ hx⟩
lemma lift_prop_within_at_congr_iff
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y) (hx : g' x = g x) :
lift_prop_within_at P g' s x ↔ lift_prop_within_at P g s x :=
hG.lift_prop_within_at_congr_iff_of_eventually_eq (eventually_nhds_within_of_forall h₁) hx
lemma lift_prop_within_at_congr
(h : lift_prop_within_at P g s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y) (hx : g' x = g x) :
lift_prop_within_at P g' s x :=
(hG.lift_prop_within_at_congr_iff h₁ hx).mpr h
lemma lift_prop_at_congr_iff_of_eventually_eq
(h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : lift_prop_at P g' x ↔ lift_prop_at P g x :=
hG.lift_prop_within_at_congr_iff_of_eventually_eq (by simp_rw [nhds_within_univ, h₁]) h₁.eq_of_nhds
lemma lift_prop_at_congr_of_eventually_eq (h : lift_prop_at P g x) (h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
lift_prop_at P g' x :=
(hG.lift_prop_at_congr_iff_of_eventually_eq h₁).mpr h
lemma lift_prop_on_congr (h : lift_prop_on P g s) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y) :
lift_prop_on P g' s :=
λ x hx, hG.lift_prop_within_at_congr (h x hx) h₁ (h₁ x hx)
lemma lift_prop_on_congr_iff (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y) :
lift_prop_on P g' s ↔ lift_prop_on P g s :=
⟨λ h, hG.lift_prop_on_congr h (λ y hy, (h₁ y hy).symm), λ h, hG.lift_prop_on_congr h h₁⟩
omit hG
lemma lift_prop_within_at_mono
(mono : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, t ⊆ s → P f s x → P f t x)
(h : lift_prop_within_at P g t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
lift_prop_within_at P g s x :=
begin
refine ⟨h.1.mono hst, _⟩,
apply mono (λ y hy, _) h.2,
simp only with mfld_simps at hy,
simp only [hy, hst _] with mfld_simps,
end
lemma lift_prop_within_at_of_lift_prop_at
(mono : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, t ⊆ s → P f s x → P f t x) (h : lift_prop_at P g x) :
lift_prop_within_at P g s x :=
begin
rw ← lift_prop_within_at_univ at h,
exact lift_prop_within_at_mono mono h (subset_univ _),
end
lemma lift_prop_on_mono (mono : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, t ⊆ s → P f s x → P f t x)
(h : lift_prop_on P g t) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
lift_prop_on P g s :=
λ x hx, lift_prop_within_at_mono mono (h x (hst hx)) hst
lemma lift_prop_on_of_lift_prop
(mono : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, t ⊆ s → P f s x → P f t x) (h : lift_prop P g) :
lift_prop_on P g s :=
begin
rw ← lift_prop_on_univ at h,
exact lift_prop_on_mono mono h (subset_univ _)
end
lemma lift_prop_at_of_mem_maximal_atlas [has_groupoid M G]
(hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y)
(he : e ∈ maximal_atlas M G) (hx : x ∈ e.source) : lift_prop_at Q e x :=
begin
simp_rw [lift_prop_at,
hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart he hx G.id_mem_maximal_atlas (mem_univ _),
(e.continuous_at hx).continuous_within_at, true_and],
exact hG.congr' (e.eventually_right_inverse' hx) (hQ _)
end
lemma lift_prop_on_of_mem_maximal_atlas [has_groupoid M G]
(hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) (he : e ∈ maximal_atlas M G) :
lift_prop_on Q e e.source :=
begin
assume x hx,
apply hG.lift_prop_within_at_of_lift_prop_at_of_mem_nhds
(hG.lift_prop_at_of_mem_maximal_atlas hQ he hx),
exact is_open.mem_nhds e.open_source hx,
end
lemma lift_prop_at_symm_of_mem_maximal_atlas [has_groupoid M G] {x : H}
(hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y)
(he : e ∈ maximal_atlas M G) (hx : x ∈ e.target) : lift_prop_at Q e.symm x :=
begin
suffices h : Q (e ∘ e.symm) univ x,
{ have A : e.symm ⁻¹' e.source ∩ e.target = e.target,
by mfld_set_tac,
have : e.symm x ∈ e.source, by simp only [hx] with mfld_simps,
rw [lift_prop_at,
hG.lift_prop_within_at_indep_chart G.id_mem_maximal_atlas (mem_univ _) he this],
refine ⟨(e.symm.continuous_at hx).continuous_within_at, _⟩,
simp only [h] with mfld_simps },
exact hG.congr' (e.eventually_right_inverse hx) (hQ x)
end
lemma lift_prop_on_symm_of_mem_maximal_atlas [has_groupoid M G]
(hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) (he : e ∈ maximal_atlas M G) :
lift_prop_on Q e.symm e.target :=
begin
assume x hx,
apply hG.lift_prop_within_at_of_lift_prop_at_of_mem_nhds
(hG.lift_prop_at_symm_of_mem_maximal_atlas hQ he hx),
exact is_open.mem_nhds e.open_target hx,
end
lemma lift_prop_at_chart [has_groupoid M G]
(hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) : lift_prop_at Q (chart_at H x) x :=
hG.lift_prop_at_of_mem_maximal_atlas hQ (chart_mem_maximal_atlas G x) (mem_chart_source H x)
lemma lift_prop_on_chart [has_groupoid M G]
(hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) :
lift_prop_on Q (chart_at H x) (chart_at H x).source :=
hG.lift_prop_on_of_mem_maximal_atlas hQ (chart_mem_maximal_atlas G x)
lemma lift_prop_at_chart_symm [has_groupoid M G]
(hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) :
lift_prop_at Q (chart_at H x).symm ((chart_at H x) x) :=
hG.lift_prop_at_symm_of_mem_maximal_atlas hQ (chart_mem_maximal_atlas G x) (by simp)
lemma lift_prop_on_chart_symm [has_groupoid M G]
(hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) :
lift_prop_on Q (chart_at H x).symm (chart_at H x).target :=
hG.lift_prop_on_symm_of_mem_maximal_atlas hQ (chart_mem_maximal_atlas G x)
lemma lift_prop_id (hG : G.local_invariant_prop G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) :
lift_prop Q (id : M → M) :=
begin
simp_rw [lift_prop_iff, continuous_id, true_and],
exact λ x, hG.congr' ((chart_at H x).eventually_right_inverse $ mem_chart_target H x) (hQ _)
end
end local_invariant_prop
section local_structomorph
variables (G)
open local_homeomorph
/-- A function from a model space `H` to itself is a local structomorphism, with respect to a
structure groupoid `G` for `H`, relative to a set `s` in `H`, if for all points `x` in the set, the
function agrees with a `G`-structomorphism on `s` in a neighbourhood of `x`. -/
def is_local_structomorph_within_at (f : H → H) (s : set H) (x : H) : Prop :=
x ∈ s → ∃ (e : local_homeomorph H H), e ∈ G ∧ eq_on f e.to_fun (s ∩ e.source) ∧ x ∈ e.source
/-- For a groupoid `G` which is `closed_under_restriction`, being a local structomorphism is a local
invariant property. -/
lemma is_local_structomorph_within_at_local_invariant_prop [closed_under_restriction G] :
local_invariant_prop G G (is_local_structomorph_within_at G) :=
{ is_local := begin
intros s x u f hu hux,
split,
{ rintros h hx,
rcases h hx.1 with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩,
have : s ∩ u ∩ e.source ⊆ s ∩ e.source := by mfld_set_tac,
exact ⟨e, heG, hef.mono this, hex⟩ },
{ rintros h hx,
rcases h ⟨hx, hux⟩ with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩,
refine ⟨e.restr (interior u), _, _, _⟩,
{ exact closed_under_restriction' heG (is_open_interior) },
{ have : s ∩ u ∩ e.source = s ∩ (e.source ∩ u) := by mfld_set_tac,
simpa only [this, interior_interior, hu.interior_eq] with mfld_simps using hef },
{ simp only [*, interior_interior, hu.interior_eq] with mfld_simps } }
end,
right_invariance' := begin
intros s x f e' he'G he'x h hx,
have hxs : x ∈ s := by simpa only [e'.left_inv he'x] with mfld_simps using hx,
rcases h hxs with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩,
refine ⟨e'.symm.trans e, G.trans (G.symm he'G) heG, _, _⟩,
{ intros y hy,
simp only with mfld_simps at hy,
simp only [hef ⟨hy.1, hy.2.2⟩] with mfld_simps },
{ simp only [hex, he'x] with mfld_simps }
end,
congr_of_forall := begin
intros s x f g hfgs hfg' h hx,
rcases h hx with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩,
refine ⟨e, heG, _, hex⟩,
intros y hy,
rw [← hef hy, hfgs y hy.1]
end,
left_invariance' := begin
intros s x f e' he'G he' hfx h hx,
rcases h hx with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩,
refine ⟨e.trans e', G.trans heG he'G, _, _⟩,
{ intros y hy,
simp only with mfld_simps at hy,
simp only [hef ⟨hy.1, hy.2.1⟩] with mfld_simps },
{ simpa only [hex, hef ⟨hx, hex⟩] with mfld_simps using hfx }
end }
end local_structomorph
end structure_groupoid
|
37b550c73a85e1fecb600b022637b18c45f2ccfe | 4efff1f47634ff19e2f786deadd394270a59ecd2 | /src/topology/category/Top/limits.lean | 6865e5e7158161cc3f804b3f1859aac1ef47c46b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | agjftucker/mathlib | d634cd0d5256b6325e3c55bb7fb2403548371707 | 87fe50de17b00af533f72a102d0adefe4a2285e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,378,131,941 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 160,748,509 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,141,789,000 | 1,544,141,789,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,870 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Scott Morrison, Mario Carneiro
-/
import topology.category.Top.basic
import category_theory.limits.types
import category_theory.limits.preserves.basic
open topological_space
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
universe u
namespace Top
variables {J : Type u} [small_category J]
local notation `forget` := forget Top
/--
A choice of limit cone for a functor `F : J ⥤ Top`.
Generally you should just use `limit.cone F`, unless you need the actual definition
(which is in terms of `types.limit_cone`).
-/
def limit_cone (F : J ⥤ Top.{u}) : cone F :=
{ X := ⟨(types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget)).X, ⨅j, (F.obj j).str.induced ((types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget)).π.app j)⟩,
π :=
{ app := λ j, ⟨(types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget)).π.app j, continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr (infi_le _ _)⟩,
naturality' := λ j j' f, continuous_map.coe_inj ((types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget)).π.naturality f) } }
/--
The chosen cone `Top.limit_cone F` for a functor `F : J ⥤ Top` is a limit cone.
Generally you should just use `limit.is_limit F`, unless you need the actual definition
(which is in terms of `types.limit_cone_is_limit`).
-/
def limit_cone_is_limit (F : J ⥤ Top.{u}) : is_limit (limit_cone F) :=
by { refine is_limit.of_faithful forget (types.limit_cone_is_limit _) (λ s, ⟨_, _⟩) (λ s, rfl),
exact continuous_iff_coinduced_le.mpr (le_infi $ λ j,
coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp $ continuous_iff_coinduced_le.mp (s.π.app j).continuous) }
instance Top_has_limits : has_limits.{u} Top.{u} :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_limit := λ F, { cone := limit_cone F, is_limit := limit_cone_is_limit F } } }
instance forget_preserves_limits : preserves_limits (forget : Top.{u} ⥤ Type u) :=
{ preserves_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥,
{ preserves_limit := λ F,
by exactI preserves_limit_of_preserves_limit_cone
(limit_cone_is_limit F) (types.limit_cone_is_limit (F ⋙ forget)) } }
/--
A choice of colimit cocone for a functor `F : J ⥤ Top`.
Generally you should just use `colimit.coone F`, unless you need the actual definition
(which is in terms of `types.colimit_cocone`).
-/
def colimit_cocone (F : J ⥤ Top.{u}) : cocone F :=
{ X := ⟨(types.colimit_cocone (F ⋙ forget)).X, ⨆ j, (F.obj j).str.coinduced ((types.colimit_cocone (F ⋙ forget)).ι.app j)⟩,
ι :=
{ app := λ j, ⟨(types.colimit_cocone (F ⋙ forget)).ι.app j, continuous_iff_coinduced_le.mpr (le_supr _ j)⟩,
naturality' := λ j j' f, continuous_map.coe_inj ((types.colimit_cocone (F ⋙ forget)).ι.naturality f) } }
/--
The chosen cocone `Top.colimit_cocone F` for a functor `F : J ⥤ Top` is a colimit cocone.
Generally you should just use `colimit.is_colimit F`, unless you need the actual definition
(which is in terms of `types.colimit_cocone_is_colimit`).
-/
def colimit_cocone_is_colimit (F : J ⥤ Top.{u}) : is_colimit (colimit_cocone F) :=
by { refine is_colimit.of_faithful forget (types.colimit_cocone_is_colimit _) (λ s, ⟨_, _⟩) (λ s, rfl),
exact continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr (supr_le $ λ j,
coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.mp $ continuous_iff_coinduced_le.mp (s.ι.app j).continuous) }
instance Top_has_colimits : has_colimits.{u} Top.{u} :=
{ has_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_colimit := λ F, { cocone := colimit_cocone F, is_colimit := colimit_cocone_is_colimit F } } }
instance forget_preserves_colimits : preserves_colimits (forget : Top.{u} ⥤ Type u) :=
{ preserves_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥,
{ preserves_colimit := λ F,
by exactI preserves_colimit_of_preserves_colimit_cocone
(colimit_cocone_is_colimit F) (types.colimit_cocone_is_colimit (F ⋙ forget)) } }
end Top
|
5390f538204c059a4e4cd77c37c2c198ddac75ff | 0845ae2ca02071debcfd4ac24be871236c01784f | /library/init/lean/compiler/ir/emitutil.lean | d41b3b07c211e86e0322321db0e85731a36548e3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean4 | 74c267eb0e900bfaa23df8de86039483ecbd60b7 | 228ddd5fdcd98dd4e9c009f425284e86917938aa | refs/heads/master | 1,643,131,356,301 | 1,562,715,572,000 | 1,562,715,572,000 | 192,390,898 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,560,792,750,000 | 1,560,792,749,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,178 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.control.conditional
import init.lean.compiler.initattr
import init.lean.compiler.ir.compilerm
/- Helper functions for backend code generators -/
namespace Lean
namespace IR
/- Return true iff `b` is of the form `let x := g ys; ret x` -/
def isTailCallTo (g : Name) (b : FnBody) : Bool :=
match b with
| FnBody.vdecl x _ (Expr.fap f _) (FnBody.ret (Arg.var y)) => x == y && f == g
| _ => false
namespace UsesLeanNamespace
abbrev M := ReaderT Environment (State NameSet)
def leanNameSpacePrefix := `Lean
partial def visitFnBody : FnBody → M Bool
| (FnBody.vdecl _ _ v b) :=
let checkFn (f : FunId) : M Bool :=
if leanNameSpacePrefix.isPrefixOf f then pure true
else do {
s ← get;
if s.contains f then
visitFnBody b
else do
modify (fun s => s.insert f);
env ← read;
match findEnvDecl env f with
| some (Decl.fdecl _ _ _ fbody) => visitFnBody fbody <||> visitFnBody b
| other => visitFnBody b
};
match v with
| Expr.fap f _ => checkFn f
| Expr.pap f _ => checkFn f
| other => visitFnBody b
| (FnBody.jdecl _ _ v b) := visitFnBody v <||> visitFnBody b
| (FnBody.case _ _ alts) := alts.anyM $ fun alt => visitFnBody alt.body
| e :=
if e.isTerminal then pure false
else visitFnBody e.body
end UsesLeanNamespace
def usesLeanNamespace (env : Environment) : Decl → Bool
| (Decl.fdecl _ _ _ b) := (UsesLeanNamespace.visitFnBody b env).run' {}
| _ := false
namespace CollectUsedDecls
abbrev M := ReaderT Environment (State NameSet)
@[inline] def collect (f : FunId) : M Unit :=
modify (fun s => s.insert f)
partial def collectFnBody : FnBody → M Unit
| (FnBody.vdecl _ _ v b) :=
match v with
| Expr.fap f _ => collect f *> collectFnBody b
| Expr.pap f _ => collect f *> collectFnBody b
| other => collectFnBody b
| (FnBody.jdecl _ _ v b) := collectFnBody v *> collectFnBody b
| (FnBody.case _ _ alts) := alts.mfor $ fun alt => collectFnBody alt.body
| e := unless e.isTerminal $ collectFnBody e.body
def collectInitDecl (fn : Name) : M Unit :=
do env ← read;
match getInitFnNameFor env fn with
| some initFn => collect initFn
| _ => pure ()
def collectDecl : Decl → M NameSet
| (Decl.fdecl fn _ _ b) := collectInitDecl fn *> CollectUsedDecls.collectFnBody b *> get
| (Decl.extern fn _ _ _) := collectInitDecl fn *> get
end CollectUsedDecls
def collectUsedDecls (env : Environment) (decl : Decl) (used : NameSet := {}) : NameSet :=
(CollectUsedDecls.collectDecl decl env).run' used
abbrev VarTypeMap := HashMap VarId IRType
abbrev JPParamsMap := HashMap JoinPointId (Array Param)
namespace CollectMaps
abbrev Collector := (VarTypeMap × JPParamsMap) → (VarTypeMap × JPParamsMap)
@[inline] def collectVar (x : VarId) (t : IRType) : Collector
| (vs, js) := (vs.insert x t, js)
def collectParams (ps : Array Param) : Collector :=
fun s => ps.foldl (fun s p => collectVar p.x p.ty s) s
@[inline] def collectJP (j : JoinPointId) (xs : Array Param) : Collector
| (vs, js) := (vs, js.insert j xs)
/- `collectFnBody` assumes the variables in -/
partial def collectFnBody : FnBody → Collector
| (FnBody.vdecl x t _ b) := collectVar x t ∘ collectFnBody b
| (FnBody.jdecl j xs v b) := collectJP j xs ∘ collectParams xs ∘ collectFnBody v ∘ collectFnBody b
| (FnBody.case _ _ alts) := fun s => alts.foldl (fun s alt => collectFnBody alt.body s) s
| e := if e.isTerminal then id else collectFnBody e.body
def collectDecl : Decl → Collector
| (Decl.fdecl _ xs _ b) := collectParams xs ∘ collectFnBody b
| _ := id
end CollectMaps
/- Return a pair `(v, j)`, where `v` is a mapping from variable/parameter to type,
and `j` is a mapping from join point to parameters.
This function assumes `d` has normalized indexes (see `normids.lean`). -/
def mkVarJPMaps (d : Decl) : VarTypeMap × JPParamsMap :=
CollectMaps.collectDecl d ({}, {})
end IR
end Lean
|
fd7280e0b0ad55fc02cbcbae318b10ef9e9a7256 | 6e9cd8d58e550c481a3b45806bd34a3514c6b3e0 | /src/data/list/basic.lean | 4140ddf2db21447e99aa4740943041a607e82e9b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sflicht/mathlib | 220fd16e463928110e7b0a50bbed7b731979407f | 1b2048d7195314a7e34e06770948ee00f0ac3545 | refs/heads/master | 1,665,934,056,043 | 1,591,373,803,000 | 1,591,373,803,000 | 269,815,267 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,591,402,068,000 | 1,591,402,067,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 154,486 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.group
import deprecated.group
import data.nat.basic
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
attribute [inline] list.head
instance : is_left_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ nil_append ⟩
instance : is_right_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ append_nil ⟩
instance : is_associative (list α) has_append.append :=
⟨ append_assoc ⟩
theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
theorem cons_inj {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
theorem cons_inj' (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
⟨λ e, cons_inj e, congr_arg _⟩
/-! ### mem -/
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, or.inl⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
classical.by_cases or.inl $ assume : a ≠ b, h.elim or.inl $ assume h, or.inr ⟨this, h⟩
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {cases h}, rcases h with rfl | h,
{ exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{cases h},
{rcases h with rfl | h,
{exact or.inl rfl},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) :
∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{cases h},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{exact ⟨c, mem_cons_self _ _, h.symm⟩},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, mem_cons_of_mem _ ha₁, ha₂⟩ }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
theorem mem_map_of_inj {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
lemma forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ l.map f, P i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ l, P (f j) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H j hj,
exact H (f j) (mem_map_of_mem f hj) },
{ assume H i hi,
rcases mem_map.1 hi with ⟨j, hj, ji⟩,
rw ← ji,
exact H j hj }
end
@[simp] lemma map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} : list.map f l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨by cases l; simp only [forall_prop_of_true, map, forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff],
λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp only [join, mem_append, @mem_join L, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right,
exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} :
b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [cons_bind, map_append, bind_map l]
/-! ### length -/
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_length_pos {l : list α} : 0 < length l → l ≠ [] :=
λ h1 h2, lt_irrefl 0 ((length_eq_zero.2 h2).subst h1)
theorem length_pos_of_ne_nil {l : list α} : l ≠ [] → 0 < length l :=
λ h, pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ λ h0, h $ length_eq_zero.1 h0
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma exists_of_length_succ {n} :
∀ l : list α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [] H := absurd H.symm $ succ_ne_zero n
| (h :: t) H := ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
lemma injective_length_iff : injective (list.length : list α → ℕ) ↔ subsingleton α :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, refine ⟨λ x y, _⟩, suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, refl },
{ intros hα l1 l2 hl, induction l1 generalizing l2; cases l2,
{ refl }, { cases hl }, { cases hl },
congr, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _, apply l1_ih, simpa using hl }
end
lemma injective_length [subsingleton α] : injective (length : list α → ℕ) :=
injective_length_iff.mpr $ by apply_instance
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
lemma empty_eq : (∅ : list α) = [] := by refl
lemma singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : list α) = [x] := rfl
lemma insert_neg [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∉ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
if_neg h
lemma insert_pos [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∈ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = l :=
if_pos h
lemma doubleton_eq [decidable_eq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : list α) = [x, y] :=
by { rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq], rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton] }
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_cons' {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ (x : α), x = a ∨ x ∈ l → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp only [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
by simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_mem_cons']
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (mem_cons_self _ _) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (mem_cons_of_mem _ xl) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, left, exact px end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp only [subset_def, mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
@[simp] theorem append_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, simp only [subset_def] at *, split; intros; simp* },
{ rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩, apply append_subset_of_subset_of_subset h1 h2 }
end
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp only [mem_map, not_and, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (h : injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_subset f⟩, intros h2 x hx,
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩,
cases h hxx', exact hx'
end
/-! ### append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp only [nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, false_and]
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp only [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c, nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true,
true_and, false_and, exists_false, false_or, or_false, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left']
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { rw nil_append, split,
{ rintro rfl, left, exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨a', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', H, rfl⟩), {refl}, {rw [← append_assoc, ← H], refl} } },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp only [cons_append, nil_append, false_and, exists_false, false_or, exists_eq_left'],
exact eq_comm },
{ simp only [cons_append, @eq_comm _ a, ih, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left,
exists_and_distrib_left] } }
end
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp only [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs, take, drop]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := congr_arg (cons x) $ take_append_drop n xs
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj :
∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) :
s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp only [length_append] at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_right h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_left' h rfl
theorem append_right_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
⟨append_left_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem append_left_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
⟨append_right_cancel, congr_arg _⟩
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
/-! ### repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n → b = a
| (n+1) h := or.elim h id $ @eq_of_mem_repeat _
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H := by cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂;
unfold length repeat; congr; [exact H₁, exact eq_repeat_of_mem H₂]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp only [*, zero_add, succ_add, repeat]; split; refl
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem join_repeat_nil (n : ℕ) : join (repeat [] n) = @nil α :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, join, append_nil]]
/-! ### pure -/
@[simp] theorem mem_pure {α} (x y : α) :
x ∈ (pure y : list α) ↔ x = y := by simp! [pure,list.ret]
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_append (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
append_bind _ _ _
/-! ### concat -/
theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp only [*, concat]; split; refl
theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by simp
theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by simp
theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, length_append, length]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by simp
/-! ### reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, cons_append]],
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, reverse_cons, append_assoc]];
refl
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; [rw [nil_append, reverse_nil, append_nil],
simp only [*, cons_append, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, reverse_append]]; refl
theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
left_inverse.injective reverse_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, length_append, length]]
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map, reverse_cons, map_append]]
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [reverse_core_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, mem_cons_iff,
not_mem_nil, false_or, or_false, or_comm]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp only [length_reverse, length_repeat],
λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ rw reverse_cons, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/-! ### is_nil -/
lemma is_nil_iff_eq_nil {l : list α} : l.is_nil ↔ l = [] :=
list.cases_on l (by simp [is_nil]) (by simp [is_nil])
/-! ### last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l;
[refl, simp only [cons_append, last_cons _ (λ H, cons_ne_nil _ _ (append_eq_nil.1 H).2), *]]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, last_append]
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
theorem last_mem : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), last l h ∈ l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := or.inl rfl
| (a::b::l) h := or.inr $ by { rw [last_cons_cons], exact last_mem (cons_ne_nil b l) }
/-! ### last' -/
@[simp] theorem last'_is_none :
∀ {l : list α}, (last' l).is_none ↔ l = []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_none (b::l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_is_some : ∀ {l : list α}, l.last'.is_some ↔ l ≠ []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_some (b::l)]
theorem mem_last'_eq_last : ∀ {l : list α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.last' → ∃ h, x = last l h
| [] x hx := false.elim $ by simpa using hx
| [a] x hx := have a = x, by simpa using hx, this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| (a::b::l) x hx :=
begin
rw last' at hx,
rcases mem_last'_eq_last hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
use cons_ne_nil _ _,
rwa [last_cons]
end
theorem mem_of_mem_last' {l : list α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.last') : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_last'_eq_last ha in h₂.symm ▸ last_mem _
theorem init_append_last' : ∀ {l : list α} (a ∈ l.last'), init l ++ [a] = l
| [] a ha := (option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a] _ rfl := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) c hc := by { rw [last'] at hc, rw [init, cons_append, init_append_last' _ hc] }
theorem ilast_eq_last' [inhabited α] : ∀ l : list α, l.ilast = l.last'.iget
| [] := by simp [ilast, arbitrary]
| [a] := rfl
| [a, b] := rfl
| [a, b, c] := rfl
| (a :: b :: c :: l) := by simp [ilast, ilast_eq_last' (c :: l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_append_cons : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (a : α) (l₂ : list α),
last' (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = last' (a :: l₂)
| [] a l₂ := rfl
| [b] a l₂ := rfl
| (b::c::l₁) a l₂ := by rw [cons_append, cons_append, last', ← cons_append, last'_append_cons]
theorem last'_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : list α) : ∀ {l₂ : list α} (hl₂ : l₂ ≠ []),
last' (l₁ ++ l₂) = last' l₂
| [] hl₂ := by contradiction
| (b::l₂) _ := last'_append_cons l₁ b l₂
/-! ### head(') and tail -/
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
theorem mem_of_mem_head' {x : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, x ∈ l.head' → x ∈ l
| [] h := (option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| (a::l) h := by { simp only [head', option.mem_def] at h, exact h ▸ or.inl rfl }
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, refl}
theorem cons_head'_tail : ∀ {l : list α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ head' l), a :: tail l = l
| [] a h := by contradiction
| (b::l) a h := by { simp at h, simp [h] }
theorem head_mem_head' [inhabited α] : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), head l ∈ head' l
| [] h := by contradiction
| (a::l) h := rfl
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
cons_head'_tail (head_mem_head' h)
@[simp] theorem head'_map (f : α → β) (l) : head' (map f l) = (head' l).map f := by cases l; refl
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem sublist.append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) :
l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h, { left, exact ‹l <+ l₂› }, { right, apply mem_cons_self } },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem sublist.reverse {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih, {refl},
{ rw reverse_cons, exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left ih },
{ rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons], exact ih.append_right [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist_iff]
using h.reverse,
λ h, h.append_right l⟩
theorem sublist.append {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α}
(hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem sublist.subset : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ s.subset
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_repeat] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/-! ### index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _) },
simp only [length, mem_cons_iff, index_of_cons], split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) (λ H, H $ or.inl h) },
{ simp only [h, false_or], rw ← ih, exact succ_inj' }
end
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {refl},
simp only [length, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b, {rw if_pos h, exact nat.zero_le _},
rw if_neg h, exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/-! ### nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_len_le : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, length l ≤ n → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_len_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_len_le hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
/-- A version of `nth_le_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem nth_le_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nth_le l n H) = nth_le (map f l) n ((length_map f l).symm ▸ H) :=
(nth_le_map f _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
/-- If one has `nth_le L i hi` in a formula and `h : L = L'`, one can not `rw h` in the formula as
`hi` gives `i < L.length` and not `i < L'.length`. The lemma `nth_le_of_eq` can be used to make
such a rewrite, with `rw (nth_le_of_eq h)`. -/
lemma nth_le_of_eq {L L' : list α} (h : L = L') {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le L' i (h ▸ hi) :=
by { congr, exact h}
@[simp] lemma nth_le_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) :
nth_le [a] n hn = a :=
have hn0 : n = 0 := le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_lt_succ hn),
by subst hn0; refl
lemma nth_le_zero [inhabited α] {L : list α} (h : 0 < L.length) :
L.nth_le 0 h = L.head :=
by { cases L, cases h, simp, }
lemma nth_le_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn₁) (hn₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n hn₁ = l₁.nth_le n hn₂
| [] _ n hn₁ hn₂ := (not_lt_zero _ hn₂).elim
| (a::l) _ 0 hn₁ hn₂ := rfl
| (a::l) _ (n+1) hn₁ hn₂ := by simp only [nth_le, cons_append];
exact nth_le_append _ _
lemma nth_le_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}
(h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂ : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length) : n - l₁.length < l₂.length :=
begin
rw list.length_append at h₂,
convert (nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff h₁).mpr h₂,
simp,
end
lemma nth_le_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n h₂ = l₂.nth_le (n - l₁.length) (nth_le_append_right_aux h₁ h₂)
| [] _ n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) _ (n+1) h₁ h₂ :=
begin
dsimp,
conv { to_rhs, congr, skip, rw [←nat.sub_sub, nat.sub.right_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel], },
rw nth_le_append_right (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₁),
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_repeat (a : α) {n m : ℕ} (h : m < (list.repeat a n).length) :
(list.repeat a n).nth_le m h = a :=
eq_of_mem_repeat (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma nth_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₁.nth n :=
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := lt_of_lt_of_le hn
(by rw length_append; exact le_add_right _ _),
by rw [nth_le_nth hn, nth_le_nth hn', nth_le_append]
lemma last_eq_nth_le : ∀ (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []),
last l h = l.nth_le (l.length - 1) (sub_lt (length_pos_of_ne_nil h) one_pos)
| [] h := rfl
| [a] h := by rw [last_singleton, nth_le_singleton]
| (a :: b :: l) h := by { rw [last_cons, last_eq_nth_le (b :: l)],
refl, exact cons_ne_nil b l }
@[simp] lemma nth_concat_length : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).nth l.length = some a
| [] a := rfl
| (b::l) a := by rw [cons_append, length_cons, nth, nth_concat_length]
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa;
simp only [aa, ext (λn, h (n+1))]; split; refl
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by { rw [nth_len_le h₁, nth_len_le], rwa [←hl], }
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} :
∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b;
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, index_of_cons, nth_le, @index_of_nth_le l]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 :
∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i :=
by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, from add_right_comm i (length l) 1);
exact λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
lemma index_of_inj [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) : index_of x l = index_of y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, have nth_le l (index_of x l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hx) =
nth_le l (index_of y l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hy),
by simp only [h],
by simpa only [index_of_nth_le],
λ h, by subst h⟩
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
lemma eq_cons_of_length_one {l : list α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nth_le 0 (h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)] :=
begin
refine ext_le (by convert h) (λ n h₁ h₂, _),
simp only [nth_le_singleton],
congr,
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₂)
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail {f g : list α → list α} (m : ℕ) :
∀n (l:list α), (l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g (m + n) =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g m) n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail n l)
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le
{f g : list α → list α} (m n : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g m =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g (m - n)) n :=
begin
rcases le_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail]
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same {f g : list α → list α} (n : ℕ) (l:list α) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g n = l.modify_nth_tail (g ∘ f) n :=
by rw [modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le n n l (le_refl n), nat.sub_self]; refl
lemma modify_nth_tail_id :
∀n (l:list α), l.modify_nth_tail id n = l
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_id n l)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m;
simp only [h, if_pos, if_true, if_false, option.map_none, option.map_some, mt succ_inj,
not_false_iff]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_length]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_eq]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_ne _ _ h]
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_eq (l : list α) (i : ℕ) (a : α)
(h : i < (l.update_nth i a).length) : (l.update_nth i a).nth_le i h = a :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← nth_le_nth, nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth]; simp * at *
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_of_ne {l : list α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.update_nth i a).length) :
(l.update_nth i a).nth_le j hj = l.nth_le j (by simpa using hj) :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, list.nth_update_nth_ne _ _ h, list.nth_le_nth]
lemma mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ l.update_nth n b), a ∈ l ∨ a = b
| [] n a b h := false.elim h
| (c::l) 0 a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
or.inr (or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _)
| (c::l) (n+1) a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
(λ h, h ▸ or.inl (mem_cons_self _ _))
(λ h, (mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth h).elim
(or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _) or.inr)
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_nil (a : α) : insert_nth 0 a [] = [a] := rfl
lemma length_insert_nth : ∀n as, n ≤ length as → length (insert_nth n a as) = length as + 1
| 0 as h := rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := congr_arg nat.succ $ length_insert_nth n as (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth (n:ℕ) (l : list α) : (l.insert_nth n a).remove_nth n = l :=
by rw [remove_nth_eq_nth_tail, insert_nth, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same];
from modify_nth_tail_id _ _
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≥ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth (m + 1) a).remove_nth n
| 0 0 [] has _ := (lt_irrefl _ has).elim
| 0 0 (a::as) has hmn := by simp [remove_nth, insert_nth]
| 0 (m+1) (a::as) has hmn := rfl
| (n+1) (m+1) (a::as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≤ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth m a).remove_nth (n + 1)
| n 0 (a :: as) has hmn := rfl
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (a :: as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) :
∀(i j : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≤ length l),
(l.insert_nth i a).insert_nth (j + 1) b = (l.insert_nth j b).insert_nth i a
| 0 j l := by simp [insert_nth]
| (i + 1) 0 l := assume h, (nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
| (i + 1) (j+1) [] := by simp
| (i + 1) (j+1) (c::l) :=
assume h₀ h₁,
by simp [insert_nth];
exact insert_nth_comm i j l (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₁)
lemma mem_insert_nth {a b : α} : ∀ {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (hi : n ≤ l.length),
a ∈ l.insert_nth n b ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l
| 0 as h := iff.rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := begin
dsimp [list.insert_nth],
erw [list.mem_cons_iff, mem_insert_nth (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h), list.mem_cons_iff,
← or.assoc, or_comm (a = a'), or.assoc]
end
end insert_nth
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] lemma map_nil (f : α → β) : map f [] = [] := rfl
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h in
by rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
lemma map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : list α} : map f l = map g l ↔ (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_congr⟩, intros h x hx,
rw [mem_iff_nth_le] at hx, rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩,
rw [nth_le_map_rev f, nth_le_map_rev g], congr, exact h
end
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]; split; refl
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldl]]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldr]]
theorem foldl_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : α → γ → α) (op' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (op a x) = op' (f a) x) : foldl op' (f a) l = f (foldl op a l) :=
eq.symm $ by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldl]] }
theorem foldr_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : γ → α → α) (op' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (op x a) = op' x (f a)) : foldr op' (f a) l = f (foldr op a l) :=
by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldr]] }
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero $ by rw [← length_map f l, h]; refl
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by unfold list.bind; induction l; simp only [map, join, list.ret, cons_append, nil_append, *];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) : f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem injective_map_iff {f : α → β} : injective (map f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
split; intros h x y hxy,
{ suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, simp [hxy] },
{ induction y generalizing x, simpa using hxy,
cases x, simpa using hxy, simp at hxy, simp [y_ih hxy.2, h hxy.1] }
end
/-! ### map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
/-! ### take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero (l : list α) : take 0 l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_length : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_length end
theorem take_all_of_le : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, length l ≤ n → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by rw [zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp only [take_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp only [take, min_succ_succ, take_take n m l]; split; refl
theorem take_repeat (a : α) : ∀ (n m : ℕ), take n (repeat a m) = repeat a (min n m)
| n 0 := by simp
| 0 m := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_repeat]
lemma map_take {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).map f = (L.map f).take i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_take], }
lemma take_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ},
n ≤ l₁.length → (l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [list.take, list.cons_append, list.take, take_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Taking the first `l₁.length + i` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first
`i` elements of `l₂` to `l₁`. -/
lemma take_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
take (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ (take i l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, take_cons, l₁_ih, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
end
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_take (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le (L.take j) i (by { rw length_take, exact lt_min hj hi }) :=
by { rw nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm hi, exact nth_le_append _ _ }
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_take' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < (L.take j).length) :
nth_le (L.take j) i hi = nth_le L i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi (by simp [le_refl])) :=
by { simp at hi, rw nth_le_take L _ hi.1 }
@[simp] theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
@[simp] lemma drop_length (l : list α) : l.drop l.length = [] :=
calc l.drop l.length = (l ++ []).drop l.length : by simp
... = [] : drop_left _ _
lemma drop_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l₁.length →
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [drop, cons_append, drop, drop_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Dropping the elements up to `l₁.length + i` in `l₁ + l₂` is the same as dropping the elements
up to `i` in `l₂`. -/
lemma drop_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
drop (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop i l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, drop, l₁_ih]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : i + j < L.length) :
nth_le L (i + j) h = nth_le (L.drop i) j
begin
have A : i < L.length := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h,
rw (take_append_drop i L).symm at h,
simpa only [le_of_lt A, min_eq_left, add_lt_add_iff_left, length_take, length_append] using h
end :=
begin
have A : length (take i L) = i, by simp [le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h)],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, nth_le_append_right];
simp [A]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : j < (L.drop i).length) :
nth_le (L.drop i) j h = nth_le L (i + j) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left ((length_drop i L) ▸ h)) :=
by rw nth_le_drop
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : ℕ) : ∀ (m) (l : list α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m [] := by simp
| 0 l := by simp
| (m+1) (a::l) :=
calc drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) : rfl
... = drop (n + m) l : drop_drop m l
... = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) : rfl
theorem drop_take : ∀ (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list α),
drop m (take (m + n) l) = take n (drop m l)
| 0 n _ := by simp
| (m+1) n nil := by simp
| (m+1) n (_::l) :=
have h: m + 1 + n = (m+n) + 1, by ac_refl,
by simpa [take_cons, h] using drop_take m n l
lemma map_drop {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.drop i).map f = (L.map f).drop i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_drop], }
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp only [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih generalizing a, {refl},
unfold foldl,
rw [ih (λ a b bin, H a b $ mem_cons_of_mem _ bin), H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
end
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih, {refl},
simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at H,
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
end
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldl_append (f a b) l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldr_cons, foldr_append b l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join (foldl f a l) L]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join a L, foldr_cons]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, foldr]]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp only [foldr_cons, foldr_eta l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_foldl {l : list α} : reverse (foldl (λ t h, h :: t) [] l) = l :=
by rw ←foldr_reverse; simp
/- scanl -/
lemma length_scanl {β : Type*} {f : α → β → α} :
∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a [] := rfl
| a (x :: l) := by erw [length_cons, length_cons, length_scanl]
/- scanr -/
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux, t, foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux_cons, foldr_cons]; split; refl
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) :=
by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp only [foldl_cons];
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; refl
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → α}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldl,foldl,foldl,← foldl_eq_of_comm',foldl,hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a [] := rfl
| a (b :: l) := by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf,foldr,foldl_eq_foldr']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → β}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)
include hf
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b::l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldr,foldr,foldr,hf,← foldr_eq_of_comm']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc];
rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### mfoldl, mfoldr -/
section mfoldl_mfoldr
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_nil (f : β → α → m β) {b} : mfoldl f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_nil (f : α → β → m β) {b} : mfoldr f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_cons {f : β → α → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldl f b (a :: l) = f b a >>= λ b', mfoldl f b' l := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_cons {f : α → β → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldr f b (a :: l) = mfoldr f b l >>= f a := rfl
variables [is_lawful_monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_append {f : β → α → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldl f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldl f b l₁ >>= λ x, mfoldl f x l₂
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldl_nil, pure_bind]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [cons_append, mfoldl_cons, mfoldl_append, bind_assoc]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_append {f : α → β → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldr f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldr f b l₂ >>= λ x, mfoldr f x l₁
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldr_nil, bind_pure]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [mfoldr_cons, cons_append, mfoldr_append, bind_assoc]
end mfoldl_mfoldr
/-! ### prod and sum -/
-- list.sum was already defined in defs.lean, but we couldn't tag it with `to_additive` yet.
attribute [to_additive] list.prod
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton : [a].prod = a := one_mul a
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr : l.prod = foldr (*) 1 l :=
list.rec_on l rfl $ λ a l ihl, by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, ihl]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (l : list α) {r : β → γ → Prop}
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀⦃a b c⦄, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ a l hl, by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl])
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom [monoid β] (l : list α) (f : α → β) [is_monoid_hom f] :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod :=
by { simp only [prod, foldl_map, (is_monoid_hom.map_one f).symm],
exact l.foldl_hom _ _ _ 1 (is_monoid_hom.map_mul f) }
-- `to_additive` chokes on the next few lemmas, so we do them by hand below
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_mul_prod_drop :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ, mul_assoc], }
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : list α) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
end monoid
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_add_sum_drop [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).sum + (L.drop i).sum = L.sum
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, add_assoc, sum_take_add_sum_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_succ [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L.take i).sum + L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, sum_take_succ, add_assoc], }
lemma eq_of_sum_take_eq [add_left_cancel_monoid α] {L L' : list α} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).sum = (L'.take i).sum) : L = L' :=
begin
apply ext_le h (λ i h₁ h₂, _),
have : (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L'.take (i + 1)).sum := h' _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁),
rw [sum_take_succ L i h₁, sum_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this,
exact add_left_cancel this
end
lemma monotone_sum_take [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (L : list α) :
monotone (λ i, (L.take i).sum) :=
begin
apply monotone_of_monotone_nat (λ n, _),
by_cases h : n < L.length,
{ rw sum_take_succ _ _ h,
exact le_add_right (le_refl _) },
{ push_neg at h,
simp [take_all_of_le h, take_all_of_le (le_trans h (nat.le_succ _))] }
end
/-- A list with sum not zero must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero [add_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : L.sum ≠ 0) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
/-- If all elements in a list are bounded below by `1`, then the length of the list is bounded
by the sum of the elements. -/
lemma length_le_sum_of_one_le (L : list ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ L, 1 ≤ i) : L.length ≤ L.sum :=
begin
induction L with j L IH h, { simp },
rw [sum_cons, length, add_comm],
exact add_le_add (h _ (set.mem_insert _ _)) (IH (λ i hi, h i (set.mem_union_right _ hi)))
end
-- Now we tie those lemmas back to their multiplicative versions.
attribute [to_additive] prod_take_mul_prod_drop prod_take_succ length_pos_of_prod_ne_one
/-- A list with positive sum must have positive length. -/
-- This is an easy consequence of `length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero`, but often useful in applications.
lemma length_pos_of_sum_pos [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : 0 < L.sum) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero L (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_erase [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] {a} :
Π {l : list α}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b::l) h :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h with rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
lemma dvd_prod [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (ha : a ∈ l) : a ∣ l.prod :=
let ⟨s, t, h⟩ := mem_split ha in
by rw [h, prod_append, prod_cons, mul_left_comm]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, a ∣ x) : a ∣ l.sum :=
begin
induction l with x l ih,
{ exact dvd_zero _ },
{ rw [list.sum_cons],
exact dvd_add (h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih (λ x hx, h x (mem_cons_of_mem _ hx))) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
lemma exists_lt_of_sum_lt [decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum < (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x < g x :=
begin
induction l with x l,
{ exfalso, exact lt_irrefl _ h },
{ by_cases h' : f x < g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases l_ih _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩, refine ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left' (lt_of_lt_of_le h $ add_le_add_right (le_of_not_gt h') _) }
end
lemma exists_le_of_sum_le [decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(hl : l ≠ []) (f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum ≤ (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ contradiction },
{ by_cases h' : f x ≤ g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases exists_lt_of_sum_lt f g _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩,
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, le_of_lt h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left' (lt_of_le_of_lt h $ add_lt_add_right (lt_of_not_ge h') _) }
end
-- Several lemmas about sum/head/tail for `list ℕ`.
-- These are hard to generalize well, as they rely on the fact that `default ℕ = 0`.
-- We'd like to state this as `L.head * L.tail.prod = L.prod`,
-- but because `L.head` relies on an inhabited instances and
-- returns a garbage value for the empty list, this is not possible.
-- Instead we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1`,
-- and below, restate the lemma just for `ℕ`.
@[to_additive]
lemma head_mul_tail_prod' [monoid α] (L : list α) :
(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1 * L.tail.prod = L.prod :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_add_tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_le_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head ≤ L.sum :=
nat.le.intro (head_add_tail_sum L)
lemma tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.tail.sum = L.sum - L.head :=
by rw [← head_add_tail_sum L, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel]
/-! ### join -/
attribute [simp] join
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l::L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
lemma join_join (l : list (list (list α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join :=
by { induction l, simp, simp [l_ih] }
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma take_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.take i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [take_append, L_ih]
end
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma drop_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.drop i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [drop_append, L_ih],
end
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le (L : list α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i+1)).drop i = [nth_le L i hi] :=
begin
induction L generalizing i,
{ simp only [length] at hi, exact (nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim },
cases i, { simp },
have : i < L_tl.length,
{ simp at hi,
exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi },
simp [L_ih this],
refl
end
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lenghts of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le (L : list (list α)) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.join.take ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum).drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = nth_le L i hi :=
begin
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i+1)).map length).take i, by simp [map_take, take_take],
simp [take_sum_join, this, drop_sum_join, drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le _ hi]
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt1 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum :=
by simp [hi, sum_take_succ, hj]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt2 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < L.join.length :=
begin
convert lt_of_lt_of_le (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj) (monotone_sum_take _ hi),
have : L.length = (L.map length).length, by simp,
simp [this, -length_map]
end
/-- The `n`-th element in a join of sublists is the `j`-th element of the `i`th sublist,
where `n` can be obtained in terms of `i` and `j` by adding the lengths of all the sublists
of index `< i`, and adding `j`. -/
lemma nth_le_join (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
nth_le L.join (((L.map length).take i).sum + j) (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) =
nth_le (nth_le L i hi) j hj :=
by rw [nth_le_take L.join (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj),
nth_le_drop, nth_le_of_eq (drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le L hi)]
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : list (list α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by simp [H], _⟩,
rintros ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩,
apply ext_le,
{ have : length (map length L) = length (map length L'), by rw length_eq,
simpa using this },
{ assume n h₁ h₂,
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, join_eq, length_eq] }
end
/-! ### lexicographic ordering -/
/-- Given a strict order `<` on `α`, the lexicographic strict order on `list α`, for which
`[a0, ..., an] < [b0, ..., b_k]` if `a0 < b0` or `a0 = b0` and `[a1, ..., an] < [b1, ..., bk]`.
The definition is given for any relation `r`, not only strict orders. -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
@[simp] theorem not_nil_right (r : α → α → Prop) (l : list α) : ¬ lex r l [].
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
instance [decidable_linear_order α] : decidable_linear_order (list α) :=
decidable_linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
/-! ### all & any -/
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
simp only [all_cons, band_coe_iff, ih, forall_mem_cons]
end
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [all_iff_forall, bool.of_to_bool_iff]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_false bool.not_ff (not_exists_mem_nil _) },
simp only [any_cons, bor_coe_iff, ih, exists_mem_cons_iff]
end
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
@[priority 500] instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl, rw [pmap, pmap, h, ih]]
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, subtype.exists]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, length]]
@[simp] lemma length_attach (L : list α) : L.attach.length = L.length := length_pmap
/-! ### find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases h : p a,
{ simp only [find_cons_of_pos _ h, h, not_true, false_and] },
{ rwa [find_cons_of_neg _ h, iff_true_intro h, true_and] }
end
theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, exact h },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, apply mem_cons_self },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-! ### lookmap -/
section lookmap
variables (f : α → option α)
@[simp] theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := rfl
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap (λ _, none) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → option α} :
∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [] H := rfl
| (a::l) H := begin
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
cases h : g a with b,
{ simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)] }
end
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), g a = g b) :
∀ l : list α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin
cases h' : f a with b,
{ simp [h', lookmap_map_eq] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h'] }
end
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), a = b) (l : list α) : l.lookmap f = l :=
by rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
theorem length_lookmap (l : list α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l :=
by rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ (λ _, ()), length_map]; simp
end lookmap
/-! ### filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]; split; refl
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
simp only [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH, map_cons], split; refl
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
by_cases pa : p a,
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_pos pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ pa], split; refl },
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_neg pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ pa] }
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp only [h, option.none_bind'] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp only [h, h', option.some_bind']
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases h : p x,
{ simp only [option.guard, if_pos h, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [option.guard, if_neg h, option.none_bind'] }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ split, { intro H, cases H }, { rintro ⟨_, H, _⟩, cases H } },
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp only [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left, this, false_or] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp only [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this, exists_eq_left] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp only [map_filter_map, H, filter_map_some]
theorem sublist.filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp only [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp only [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_map f ▸ s.filter_map _
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw forall_mem_cons at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h.1.1 pa), filter_congr h.2],
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ (mt h.1.2 pa), filter_congr h.2]];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
(filter_sublist l).subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, by simpa only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb] using ain,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| (_::l) (or.inl rfl) pa := by rw filter_cons_of_pos _ pa; apply mem_cons_self
| (b::l) (or.inr ain) pa := if pb : p b
then by rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; apply mem_cons_of_mem; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
else by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb]; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_inj', ih, and_iff_right h] },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
refine iff_of_false _ (mt and.left h), intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _) }
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_filter p ▸ s.filter_map _
theorem filter_of_map (f : β → α) (l) : filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] : ∀ l,
filter p (filter q l) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := by by_cases hp : p a; by_cases hq : q a; simp only [hp, hq, filter, if_true, if_false,
true_and, false_and, filter_filter l, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma filter_true {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, true)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, true) h l = l :=
by convert filter_eq_self.2 (λ _ _, trivial)
@[simp] lemma filter_false {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, false)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, false) h l = [] :=
by convert filter_eq_nil.2 (λ _ _, id)
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) :=
if pa : p a then by simp only [span, if_pos pa, span_eq_take_drop l, take_while, drop_while]
else by simp only [span, take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_pos pa, if_pos pa, cons_append,
take_while_append_drop l]
else by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa, if_neg pa, nil_append]
@[simp] theorem countp_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l ih; [refl, by_cases (p x)];
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, countp, ih, if_pos h],
simp only [countp_cons_of_neg _ h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg _ h]]; refl
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa only [countp_eq_length_filter] using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter s)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (l : list α) :
countp p (filter q l) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
end filter
/-! ### count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_tail : Π (l : list α) (a : α) (h : 0 < l.length),
l.tail.count a = l.count a - ite (a = list.nth_le l 0 h) 1 0
| (_ :: _) a h := by { rw [count_cons], split_ifs; simp }
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append
theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by simp [-add_comm]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp only [count, countp_pos, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp only [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa only [count_repeat] using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {l : list α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p l) = count a l :=
by simp only [count, countp_filter]; congr; exact
set.ext (λ b, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ e, e ▸ h))
end count
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) :=
by rw ← list.append_assoc; apply infix_append
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp only [h, append_nil]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp only [reverse_reverse]
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_right_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem tail_suffix (l : list α) : tail l <:+ l := by rw ← drop_one; apply drop_suffix
theorem tail_subset (l : list α) : tail l ⊆ l := (sublist_of_suffix (tail_suffix l)).subset
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; rw drop_left, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp only [length_append, nat.add_sub_cancel, take_left], λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa only [inits, mem_singleton],
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp only [tails, mem_singleton];
exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp only [tails, mem_cons_iff, mem_tails s t];
exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp only [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists', map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s,
{ simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map],
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ h },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl h },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l, length_map,
length, pow_succ, mul_succ, mul_zero, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp only [*, append_assoc]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp only [sublists_aux, foldr_cons], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr' 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih, {refl},
simp only [ih, foldr_cons]
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, nil_append, append_nil]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, cons_append, sublists_aux₁_append l₁, append_assoc];
refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp only [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁, append_assoc, append_nil]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := rfl
| (a::l) f g := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, bind_append, sublists_aux₁_bind l]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp only [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux₁_append, bind_eq_bind,
sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, apply congr_arg _,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], exact (append_nil _).symm
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp only [map, sublists, sublists_aux_cons_append, map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind,
cons_bind, map_id', append_nil, cons_append, map_id' (λ _, rfl)]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_bind, cons_bind, cons_bind, nil_bind,
map_eq_map, map_eq_map, map_id' (append_nil), append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [refl,
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind, map_map, cons_bind, append_nil, nil_bind, (∘)]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id' (reverse_reverse)]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro, {rwa foldr},
simp only [foldr, mem_cons_iff, false_or, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_inj reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2 $ singleton_sublist.2 $
mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by refl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
/-! ### sublists_len -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
of `f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublists_len_aux {α β : Type*} : ℕ → list α → (list α → β) → list β → list β
| 0 l f r := f [] :: r
| (n+1) [] f r := r
| (n+1) (a::l) f r := sublists_len_aux (n + 1) l f
(sublists_len_aux n l (f ∘ list.cons a) r)
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
`l = [0, 1, 2, 3]` and `n = 2`, one gets
`[[2, 3], [1, 3], [1, 2], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1]]`. -/
def sublists_len {α : Type*} (n : ℕ) (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists_len_aux n l id []
lemma sublists_len_aux_append {α β γ : Type*} :
∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (g : β → γ) (r : list β) (s : list γ),
sublists_len_aux n l (g ∘ f) (r.map g ++ s) =
(sublists_len_aux n l f r).map g ++ s
| 0 l f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) [] f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) f g r s := begin
unfold sublists_len_aux,
rw [show ((g ∘ f) ∘ list.cons a) = (g ∘ f ∘ list.cons a), by refl,
sublists_len_aux_append, sublists_len_aux_append]
end
lemma sublists_len_aux_eq {α β : Type*} (l : list α) (n) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux n l f r = (sublists_len n l).map f ++ r :=
by rw [sublists_len, ← sublists_len_aux_append]; refl
lemma sublists_len_aux_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux 0 l f r = f [] :: r := by cases l; refl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) :
sublists_len 0 l = [[]] := sublists_len_aux_zero _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_nil {α : Type*} (n) :
sublists_len (n+1) (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_cons {α : Type*} (n) (a : α) (l) :
sublists_len (n + 1) (a::l) =
sublists_len (n + 1) l ++ (sublists_len n l).map (cons a) :=
by rw [sublists_len, sublists_len_aux, sublists_len_aux_eq,
sublists_len_aux_eq, map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] lemma length_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
length (sublists_len n l) = nat.choose (length l) n
| 0 l := by simp
| (n+1) [] := by simp
| (n+1) (a::l) := by simp [-add_comm, nat.choose, *]; apply add_comm
lemma sublists_len_sublist_sublists' {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
sublists_len n l <+ sublists' l
| 0 l := singleton_sublist.2 (mem_sublists'.2 (nil_sublist _))
| (n+1) [] := nil_sublist _
| (n+1) (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, sublists'_cons],
exact (sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).append
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).map _)
end
lemma sublists_len_sublist_of_sublist
{α : Type*} (n) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : sublists_len n l₁ <+ sublists_len n l₂ :=
begin
induction n with n IHn generalizing l₁ l₂, {simp},
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH, {refl},
{ refine IH.trans _,
rw sublists_len_succ_cons,
apply sublist_append_left },
{ simp [sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact IH.append ((IHn s).map _) }
end
lemma length_of_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ {n} {l l' : list α},
l' ∈ sublists_len n l → length l' = n
| 0 l l' (or.inl rfl) := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) l' h := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, mem_append, mem_map] at h,
rcases h with h | ⟨l', h, rfl⟩,
{ exact length_of_sublists_len h },
{ exact congr_arg (+1) (length_of_sublists_len h) },
end
lemma mem_sublists_len_self {α : Type*} {l l' : list α}
(h : l' <+ l) : l' ∈ sublists_len (length l') l :=
begin
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ cases l₁ with b l₁,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_left _ IH } },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_right _ (mem_map.2 ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩) }
end
@[simp] lemma mem_sublists_len {α : Type*} {n} {l l' : list α} :
l' ∈ sublists_len n l ↔ l' <+ l ∧ length l' = n :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_sublists'.1
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).subset h),
length_of_sublists_len h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_sublists_len_self h₁⟩
/-! ### permutations -/
section permutations
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]; refl
end permutations
/-! ### insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_pos h]
@[simp, priority 970]
theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_neg h]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l,
{ simp only [insert_of_mem h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h' },
simp only [insert_of_not_mem h', mem_cons_iff]
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; [simp only [insert_of_mem h], simp only [insert_of_not_mem h, suffix_cons]]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by rw insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by rw insert_of_not_mem h; refl
end insert
/-! ### erasep -/
section erasep
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem erasep_nil : [].erasep p = [] := rfl
theorem erasep_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
(a :: l).erasep p = if p a then l else a :: l.erasep p := rfl
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : p a) : (a :: l).erasep p = l :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ p a) :
(a::l).erasep p = a :: l.erasep p :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
theorem erasep_of_forall_not {l : list α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) : l.erasep p = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [h _ (or.inl rfl), ih (forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_of_erasep {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {cases al},
by_cases pb : p b,
{ exact ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩ },
{ rcases al with rfl | al, {exact pb.elim pa},
rcases IH al with ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
exact ⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw h₃; refl, by simp [pb, h₄]⟩ }
end
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
l.erasep p = l ∨ ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, ha, pa⟩,
exact or.inr (exists_of_erasep ha pa) },
{ simp at h, exact or.inl (erasep_of_forall_not h) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_erasep_of_mem {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.erasep p) = pred (length l) :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep al pa with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩;
rw e₂; simp [-add_comm, e₁]; refl
theorem erasep_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁.erasep p ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : p x; simp [h'],
rw erasep_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (mt _ h') h),
rintro rfl, exact pa
end
theorem erasep_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂.erasep p
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1,
erasep_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem erasep_sublist (l : list α) : l.erasep p <+ l :=
by rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩;
[rw h, {rw [h₄, h₃], simp}]
theorem erasep_subset (l : list α) : l.erasep p ⊆ l :=
(erasep_sublist l).subset
theorem sublist.erasep {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erasep p <+ l₂.erasep p :=
begin
induction s,
case list.sublist.slnil { refl },
case list.sublist.cons : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [IH.trans (erasep_sublist _), IH.cons _ _ _] },
case list.sublist.cons2 : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [s, IH.cons2 _ _ _] }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_erasep {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erasep p → a ∈ l :=
@erasep_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erasep_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (pa : ¬ p a) : a ∈ l.erasep p ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erasep, λ al, begin
rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
{ rwa h },
{ rw h₄, rw h₃ at al,
have : a ≠ c, {rintro rfl, exact pa.elim h₂},
simpa [this] using al }
end⟩
theorem erasep_map (f : β → α) :
∀ (l : list β), (map f l).erasep p = map f (l.erasep (p ∘ f))
| [] := rfl
| (b::l) := by by_cases p (f b); simp [h, erasep_map l]
@[simp] theorem extractp_eq_find_erasep :
∀ l : list α, extractp p l = (find p l, erasep p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [extractp, pa, extractp_eq_find_erasep l]
end erasep
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
(b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]; split; refl
theorem erase_eq_erasep (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a = l.erasep (eq a) :=
by { induction l with b l, {refl},
by_cases a = b; [simp [h], simp [h, ne.symm h, *]] }
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erasep_of_forall_not]; rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep h rfl with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, rfl, h₂, h₃⟩;
rw erase_eq_erasep; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, λ h, h₁ _ h rfl, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact length_erasep_of_mem h rfl
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_append_left (by refl) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_append_right];
rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; apply erasep_sublist
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
(erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact sublist.erasep h
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact mem_erasep_of_neg ab.symm
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by rw ab else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α}
(l : list α) : map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_map]; congr;
ext b; simp [finj.eq_iff]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; [refl,
simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s a) = pred (count a s)
| [] := by simp
| (h :: t) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
by_cases p : h = a,
{ rw [if_pos p, count_cons', if_pos p.symm], simp },
{ rw [if_neg p, count_cons', count_cons', if_neg (λ x : a = h, p x.symm), count_erase_self],
simp, }
end
@[simp] theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s b) = count a s
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [count_cons', h, if_neg ab], simp },
{ rw [count_cons', count_cons', count_erase_of_ne] }
end
end erase
/-! ### diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp only [list.diff, if_pos h]
else by simp only [list.diff, if_neg h, erase_of_not_mem h]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : list α) : [].diff l = [] :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, diff_cons, erase_of_not_mem (not_mem_nil _)]]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| l₁ [] := sublist.refl _
| l₁ (a::l₂) := calc l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ : diff_cons _ _ _
... <+ l₁.erase a : diff_sublist _ _
... <+ l₁ : list.erase_sublist _ _
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
(diff_sublist _ _).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] h₁ h₂ := h₁
| l₁ (b::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by rw diff_cons; exact
mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne (ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂)).2 h₁) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h₂)
theorem sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃: list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| l₁ l₂ [] h := h
| l₁ l₂ (a::l₃) h := by simp only
[diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α},
l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [] l₂ h := erase_sublist _ _
| (b::l₁) l₂ h := if heq : b = a then by simp only [heq, erase_cons_head, diff_cons]
else by simpa only [erase_cons_head, erase_cons_tail _ heq, diff_cons,
erase_comm a b l₂]
using erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist (h.erase b)
end diff
/-! ### enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_nth, zero_add]; intros; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
theorem mem_enum_from {x : α} {i : ℕ} :
∀ {j : ℕ} (xs : list α), (i, x) ∈ xs.enum_from j → j ≤ i ∧ i < j + xs.length ∧ x ∈ xs
| j [] := by simp [enum_from]
| j (y :: ys) :=
suffices i = j ∧ x = y ∨ (i, x) ∈ enum_from (j + 1) ys →
j ≤ i ∧ i < j + (length ys + 1) ∧ (x = y ∨ x ∈ ys),
by simpa [enum_from, mem_enum_from ys],
begin
rintro (h|h),
{ refine ⟨le_of_eq h.1.symm,h.1 ▸ _,or.inl h.2⟩,
apply nat.lt_add_of_pos_right; simp },
{ obtain ⟨hji, hijlen, hmem⟩ := mem_enum_from _ h,
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (nat.le_succ _) hji },
{ convert hijlen using 1, ac_refl },
{ simp [hmem] } }
end
/-! ### product -/
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp only [product, mem_bind, mem_map, prod.ext_iff, exists_prop,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [exact (zero_mul _).symm,
simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH,
right_distrib, one_mul, length_map, add_comm]]
/-! ### sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp only [list.sigma, mem_bind, mem_map, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left,
and.left_comm, exists_eq_left, heq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [refl,
simp only [map, sigma_cons, length_append, length_map, IH, sum_cons]]
end
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : list α) : disjoint l [] :=
by rw disjoint_comm; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_singleton, forall_eq]; refl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
end disjoint
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [nil_union, not_mem_nil, false_or, cons_union, mem_insert_iff,
mem_cons_iff, or_assoc, *]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂
then ⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else ⟨a::t, cons_sublist_cons _ s, by simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h];
split; refl⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/-! ### inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter, not_and]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
end inter
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
-- A jumble of lost lemmas:
theorem ilast'_mem : ∀ a l, @ilast' α a l ∈ a :: l
| a [] := or.inl rfl
| a (b::l) := or.inr (ilast'_mem b l)
@[simp] lemma nth_le_attach (L : list α) (i) (H : i < L.attach.length) :
(L.attach.nth_le i H).1 = L.nth_le i (length_attach L ▸ H) :=
calc (L.attach.nth_le i H).1
= (L.attach.map subtype.val).nth_le i (by simpa using H) : by rw nth_le_map'
... = L.nth_le i _ : by congr; apply attach_map_val
end list
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.map_list_prod {α β : Type*} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β) (l : list α) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
(l.prod_hom f).symm
namespace list
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_hom {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (L : list α) (f : α → β) (g : β →* γ) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g ((L.map f).prod) :=
by {rw g.map_list_prod, exact congr_arg _ (map_map _ _ _).symm}
theorem sum_map_mul_left {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, r * f b)).sum = r * (L.map f).sum :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_left r
theorem sum_map_mul_right {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, f b * r)).sum = (L.map f).sum * r :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_right r
end list
|
adfe6c286bbe5a80d2f41d6a963daa4764589091 | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/topology/instances/nnreal.lean | 66cf38fb503dcf75fa8b354dd14936470b73ac20 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,327 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import topology.algebra.infinite_sum
import topology.algebra.group_with_zero
/-!
# Topology on `ℝ≥0`
The natural topology on `ℝ≥0` (the one induced from `ℝ`), and a basic API.
## Main definitions
Instances for the following typeclasses are defined:
* `topological_space ℝ≥0`
* `topological_ring ℝ≥0`
* `second_countable_topology ℝ≥0`
* `order_topology ℝ≥0`
* `has_continuous_sub ℝ≥0`
* `has_continuous_inv' ℝ≥0` (continuity of `x⁻¹` away from `0`)
* `has_continuous_smul ℝ≥0 ℝ`
Everything is inherited from the corresponding structures on the reals.
## Main statements
Various mathematically trivial lemmas are proved about the compatibility
of limits and sums in `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ`. For example
* `tendsto_coe {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ≥0} :
tendsto (λa, (m a : ℝ)) f (𝓝 (x : ℝ)) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 x)`
says that the limit of a filter along a map to `ℝ≥0` is the same in `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0`, and
* `coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ((∑'a, f a) : ℝ) = (∑'a, (f a : ℝ))`
says that says that a sum of elements in `ℝ≥0` is the same in `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0`.
Similarly, some mathematically trivial lemmas about infinite sums are proved,
a few of which rely on the fact that subtraction is continuous.
-/
noncomputable theory
open set topological_space metric filter
open_locale topological_space
namespace nnreal
open_locale nnreal big_operators filter
instance : topological_space ℝ≥0 := infer_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance : topological_ring ℝ≥0 :=
{ continuous_mul := continuous_subtype_mk _ $
(continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_snd),
continuous_add := continuous_subtype_mk _ $
(continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_fst).add (continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_snd) }
instance : second_countable_topology ℝ≥0 :=
topological_space.subtype.second_countable_topology _ _
instance : order_topology ℝ≥0 := @order_topology_of_ord_connected _ _ _ _ (Ici 0) _
section coe
variable {α : Type*}
open filter finset
lemma continuous_of_real : continuous real.to_nnreal :=
continuous_subtype_mk _ $ continuous_id.max continuous_const
lemma continuous_coe : continuous (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) :=
continuous_subtype_val
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma tendsto_coe {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ≥0} :
tendsto (λa, (m a : ℝ)) f (𝓝 (x : ℝ)) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_subtype_rng.symm
lemma tendsto_coe' {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {m : α → ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} :
tendsto (λ a, m a : α → ℝ) f (𝓝 x) ↔ ∃ hx : 0 ≤ x, tendsto m f (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨ge_of_tendsto' h (λ c, (m c).2), tendsto_coe.1 h⟩, λ ⟨hx, hm⟩, tendsto_coe.2 hm⟩
@[simp] lemma map_coe_at_top : map (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) at_top = at_top :=
map_coe_Ici_at_top 0
lemma comap_coe_at_top : comap (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) at_top = at_top :=
(at_top_Ici_eq 0).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma tendsto_coe_at_top {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} :
tendsto (λ a, (m a : ℝ)) f at_top ↔ tendsto m f at_top :=
tendsto_Ici_at_top.symm
lemma tendsto_of_real {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (h : tendsto m f (𝓝 x)) :
tendsto (λa, real.to_nnreal (m a)) f (𝓝 (real.to_nnreal x)) :=
(continuous_of_real.tendsto _).comp h
lemma nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0) = ⨅a ≠ 0, 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans $ by simp [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Iio]
lemma nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0)).has_basis (λ a : ℝ≥0, 0 < a) (λ a, Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_basis
instance : has_continuous_sub ℝ≥0 :=
⟨continuous_subtype_mk _ $
((continuous_coe.comp continuous_fst).sub
(continuous_coe.comp continuous_snd)).max continuous_const⟩
instance : has_continuous_inv₀ ℝ≥0 :=
⟨λ x hx, tendsto_coe.1 $ (real.tendsto_inv $ nnreal.coe_ne_zero.2 hx).comp
continuous_coe.continuous_at⟩
instance : has_continuous_smul ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
{ continuous_smul := continuous.comp real.continuous_mul $ continuous.prod_mk
(continuous.comp continuous_subtype_val continuous_fst) continuous_snd }
@[norm_cast] lemma has_sum_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
has_sum (λa, (f a : ℝ)) (r : ℝ) ↔ has_sum f r :=
by simp only [has_sum, coe_sum.symm, tendsto_coe]
lemma has_sum_of_real_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf_nonneg : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) (hf : summable f) :
has_sum (λ n, real.to_nnreal (f n)) (real.to_nnreal (∑' n, f n)) :=
begin
have h_sum : (λ s, ∑ b in s, real.to_nnreal (f b)) = λ s, real.to_nnreal (∑ b in s, f b),
from funext (λ _, (real.to_nnreal_sum_of_nonneg (λ n _, hf_nonneg n)).symm),
simp_rw [has_sum, h_sum],
exact tendsto_of_real hf.has_sum,
end
@[norm_cast] lemma summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} : summable (λa, (f a : ℝ)) ↔ summable f :=
begin
split,
exact assume ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨⟨a, has_sum_le (λa, (f a).2) has_sum_zero ha⟩, has_sum_coe.1 ha⟩,
exact assume ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨a.1, has_sum_coe.2 ha⟩
end
lemma summable_coe_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf₁ : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
@summable (ℝ≥0) _ _ _ (λ n, ⟨f n, hf₁ n⟩) ↔ summable f :=
begin
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using hf₁ with f rfl hf₁,
simp only [summable_coe, subtype.coe_eta]
end
open_locale classical
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑∑'a, f a = ∑'a, (f a : ℝ) :=
if hf : summable f
then (eq.symm $ (has_sum_coe.2 $ hf.has_sum).tsum_eq)
else by simp [tsum, hf, mt summable_coe.1 hf]
lemma coe_tsum_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf₁ : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
(⟨∑' n, f n, tsum_nonneg hf₁⟩ : ℝ≥0) = (∑' n, ⟨f n, hf₁ n⟩ : ℝ≥0) :=
begin
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using hf₁ with f rfl hf₁,
simp_rw [← nnreal.coe_tsum, subtype.coe_eta]
end
lemma tsum_mul_left (a : ℝ≥0) (f : α → ℝ≥0) : ∑' x, a * f x = a * ∑' x, f x :=
nnreal.eq $ by simp only [coe_tsum, nnreal.coe_mul, tsum_mul_left]
lemma tsum_mul_right (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (∑' x, f x * a) = (∑' x, f x) * a :=
nnreal.eq $ by simp only [coe_tsum, nnreal.coe_mul, tsum_mul_right]
lemma summable_comp_injective {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : summable f)
{i : β → α} (hi : function.injective i) :
summable (f ∘ i) :=
nnreal.summable_coe.1 $
show summable ((coe ∘ f) ∘ i), from (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hf).comp_injective hi
lemma summable_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0) (hf : summable f) (k : ℕ) : summable (λ i, f (i + k)) :=
summable_comp_injective hf $ add_left_injective k
lemma summable_nat_add_iff {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} (k : ℕ) : summable (λ i, f (i + k)) ↔ summable f :=
begin
rw [← summable_coe, ← summable_coe],
exact @summable_nat_add_iff ℝ _ _ _ (λ i, (f i : ℝ)) k,
end
lemma has_sum_nat_add_iff {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} (k : ℕ) {a : ℝ≥0} :
has_sum (λ n, f (n + k)) a ↔ has_sum f (a + ∑ i in range k, f i) :=
by simp [← has_sum_coe, coe_sum, nnreal.coe_add, ← has_sum_nat_add_iff k]
lemma sum_add_tsum_nat_add {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} (k : ℕ) (hf : summable f) :
∑' i, f i = (∑ i in range k, f i) + ∑' i, f (i + k) :=
by rw [←nnreal.coe_eq, coe_tsum, nnreal.coe_add, coe_sum, coe_tsum,
sum_add_tsum_nat_add k (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hf)]
lemma infi_real_pos_eq_infi_nnreal_pos [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ → α} :
(⨅ (n : ℝ) (h : 0 < n), f n) = (⨅ (n : ℝ≥0) (h : 0 < n), f n) :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_infi2 $ assume r, ⟨r, infi_le_infi $ assume hr, le_rfl⟩)
(le_infi $ assume r, le_infi $ assume hr, infi_le_of_le ⟨r, hr.le⟩ $ infi_le _ hr)
end coe
lemma tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_summable {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : summable f) :
tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 0) :=
begin
have h_f_coe : f = λ n, real.to_nnreal (f n : ℝ), from funext (λ n, real.to_nnreal_coe.symm),
rw [h_f_coe, ← @real.to_nnreal_coe 0],
exact tendsto_of_real ((summable_coe.mpr hf).tendsto_cofinite_zero),
end
lemma tendsto_at_top_zero_of_summable {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} (hf : summable f) :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw ←nat.cofinite_eq_at_top, exact tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_summable hf }
end nnreal
|
2c965a355f8e9907a96068ba3d651721995ac823 | 2731214ea32f2a1a985300e281fb3117640a16c3 | /portmanteau_definitions.lean | 76b45727b8309f649e4dc07ed008d2dbc50727d8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kkytola/lean_portmanteau | 5d6a156db959974ebc4f5bed9118a7a2438a33fa | ac55eb4e24be43032cbc082e2b68d8fb8bd63f22 | refs/heads/main | 1,686,107,117,334 | 1,625,177,052,000 | 1,625,177,052,000 | 381,514,032 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,688 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import tactic
import measure_theory.measurable_space
import measure_theory.integration
import measure_theory.borel_space
import measure_theory.bochner_integration
import topology.metric_space.basic
import topology.instances.real
import topology.instances.ennreal
import order.liminf_limsup
noncomputable theory
open set
open classical
open measure_theory
open measurable_space
open filter
open_locale topological_space
namespace portmanteau
abbreviation bdd_Rval {β : Type*} (f : β → ℝ) : Prop :=
∃ (M : ℝ) , ∀ (b : β) , abs(f(b)) ≤ M
abbreviation bdd_ennval {α : Type*} (f : α → ennreal) : Prop :=
∃ (M : nnreal) , ∀ (a : α) , f(a) ≤ M
section test_functions_for_weak_convergence
/-- Continuous bounded functions on a topological space `α` with values
in `ennreal` are used as "test functions" in the definition of the topology of
the weak convergence of probability measures. They are defined as a subtype
of `α → ennreal`, so that the type of (positive) functionals is just
`(cont_bdd_ennval α) → ennreal`. -/
def cont_bdd_ennval (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Type*
:= { f : α → ennreal // continuous f ∧ bdd_ennval f }
def functional_cont_bdd_ennval (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Type*
:= (cont_bdd_ennval α) → ennreal
instance {α : Type*} [topological_space α] :
has_coe (cont_bdd_ennval α) (α → ennreal) := ⟨subtype.val⟩
@[simp] lemma val_eq_coe_testfun {α : Type*} [topological_space α] (f : cont_bdd_ennval α) :
f.val = f := rfl
/-- As a first step towards the definition of the topology of the weak convergence
of probability measures, the space of functionals `(cont_bdd_ennval α) → ennreal`
is equipped with the product topology (the topology of "testfunctionwise" convergence,
i.e., of pointwise convergence of the functionals defined on the space of continuous
bounded test functions). -/
instance {α : Type*} [topological_space α] :
topological_space (functional_cont_bdd_ennval α) := Pi.topological_space
/-- In an alternative an more familiar formulation, continuous bounded `ℝ`-valued
functions on a topological space `α` are used as "test functions" in the definition
of the topology of the weak convergence of probability measures. They are defined as
a subtype of `α → ℝ`. -/
def cont_bdd_Rval (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Type*
:= { f : α → ℝ // continuous f ∧ bdd_Rval f }
def cont_bdd_Rval_mk {α : Type*} [topological_space α]
(g : α → ℝ) (g_cont : continuous g) (g_bdd : bdd_Rval g) : cont_bdd_Rval α :=
{ val := g ,
property := ⟨ g_cont , g_bdd ⟩ , }
-- TODO: It would be good to equip `cont_bdd_Rval` with the sup-norm, show that it is
-- a Banach space, define the (continuous) dual of it, equip it with the dual norm,
-- show that each Borel probability measure defines an element of the (continuous)
-- dual, etc... At least currently the result `weak_conv_seq_iff` essentially shows
-- that the mapping the Borel probability measures into the dual will be an
-- embedding (the topologies are compatible).
--TODO: I can't use the same name for the following coercion.
--instance {α : Type*} [topological_space α] :
-- has_coe (cont_bdd_Rval α) (α → ℝ) := ⟨subtype.val⟩
end test_functions_for_weak_convergence
section topology_of_weak_convergence
/-- Borel probability measures on a topological space `α` are defined as a subtype
of measures. This subtype `borel_proba α` is equipped with the topology of weak
convergence. -/
def borel_proba (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : Type
:= { μ : @measure_theory.measure α (borel(α)) // @probability_measure α (borel(α)) μ }
instance (α : Type*) [topological_space α] :
has_coe (borel_proba α) (@measure_theory.measure α (borel(α))) := ⟨subtype.val⟩
@[simp] lemma val_eq_coe_borel_proba {α : Type*} [topological_space α] (ν : borel_proba α) :
ν.val = ν := rfl
abbreviation integrate_cont_bdd_ennval {α : Type*} [topological_space α]
(μ : borel_proba α) (f : cont_bdd_ennval α) : ennreal := @lintegral α (borel(α)) μ f
/-- The topology of weak convergence on `borel_proba α` is defined as the induced
topology of the mapping `(borel_proba α) → ((cont_bdd_ennval α) → ennreal)` to
functionals defined by integration of a test functio against to the measure. In
other contexts this could be called the weak-* topology. -/
instance {α : Type} [topological_space α] : topological_space (borel_proba α)
:= topological_space.induced (λ (μ : borel_proba α) , integrate_cont_bdd_ennval μ) infer_instance
/-- Integration of test functions against borel probability measures depends
continuously on the measure. -/
lemma integrate_cont_bdd_ennval_cont {α : Type} [topological_space α] :
continuous (@integrate_cont_bdd_ennval α _) := continuous_induced_dom
-- Remark: It felt convenient to isolate the following fact (does it exist already?).
lemma conv_seq_induced {α γ : Type*} [top_γ : topological_space γ]
(f : α → γ) (x : ℕ → α) (x₀ : α) :
tendsto (f ∘ x) at_top (𝓝 (f(x₀)))
→ tendsto x at_top (@nhds α (topological_space.induced f top_γ) x₀) :=
begin
intro h_f_lim ,
apply tendsto_nhds.mpr ,
intros U open_U U_ni_x₀ ,
rcases ((@is_open_induced_iff α γ top_γ U f).mp open_U) with ⟨ V , open_V , preim_V_eq_U ⟩ ,
induction preim_V_eq_U ,
apply tendsto_nhds.mp h_f_lim V open_V U_ni_x₀ ,
end
/-- The usual definition of weak convergence of probability measures is given in
terms of sequences of probability measures: it is the requirement that the integrals
of all continuous bounded functions against members of the sequence converge.
This characterization is shown in `weak_conv_seq_iff'` in the case when the
functions are `ennreal`-valued and the integral is `lintegral`. The most common
formulation with `ℝ`-valued functions and Bochner integrals is `weak_conv_seq_iff`. -/
theorem weak_conv_seq_iff' {α : Type*} [topological_space α]
{μseq : ℕ → borel_proba α} {μ : borel_proba α} :
tendsto μseq at_top (𝓝 μ)
↔ ∀ (f : cont_bdd_ennval α) ,
tendsto (λ n, integrate_cont_bdd_ennval (μseq(n)) f) at_top (𝓝 (integrate_cont_bdd_ennval μ f)) :=
begin
split ,
{ intros weak_conv ,
have key := tendsto.comp (continuous.tendsto (@integrate_cont_bdd_ennval_cont α _) μ) weak_conv ,
exact tendsto_pi.mp key , } ,
{ intro h_lim_forall ,
have h_lim : tendsto (λ n, integrate_cont_bdd_ennval (μseq(n))) at_top (𝓝 (integrate_cont_bdd_ennval μ)) ,
{ exact tendsto_pi.mpr h_lim_forall , } ,
exact conv_seq_induced _ μseq μ h_lim , } ,
end
end topology_of_weak_convergence
section equivalent_conditions
-- See <pormanteau_conclusions.lean> for the main theorems about the equivalence.
abbreviation portmanteau_continuous_ennval {α : Type} [topological_space α]
(μseq : ℕ → @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) (μ : @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) : Prop :=
∀ (f : α → ennreal) , (continuous f) → (bdd_ennval f) →
tendsto (λ n , (@lintegral α (borel(α)) (μseq(n)) f) ) at_top (𝓝 (@lintegral α (borel(α)) μ f))
abbreviation portmanteau_continuous_Rval {α : Type} [topological_space α]
(μseq : ℕ → @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) (μ : @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) : Prop :=
∀ (f : α → ℝ) , (continuous f) → (bdd_Rval f) →
tendsto (λ n , (@integral α ℝ (borel(α)) _ _ _ _ _ _ (μseq(n)) f)) at_top (𝓝 (@integral α ℝ (borel(α)) _ _ _ _ _ _ μ f))
abbreviation portmanteau_open {α : Type} [topological_space α]
(μseq : ℕ → @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) (μ : @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) : Prop :=
∀ (G : set α) , (is_open G) → μ(G) ≤ liminf at_top (λ n , (μseq(n))(G))
abbreviation portmanteau_closed {α : Type} [topological_space α]
(μseq : ℕ → @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) (μ : @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) : Prop :=
∀ (F : set α) , (is_closed F) → limsup at_top (λ n , (μseq(n))(F)) ≤ μ(F)
abbreviation portmanteau_borel {α : Type} [topological_space α]
(μseq : ℕ → @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) (μ : @measure_theory.measure α (borel α)) : Prop :=
∀ (E : set α) , ((borel α).measurable_set' E) → (μ(frontier E) = 0)
→ (tendsto (λ n , (μseq(n))(E)) at_top (𝓝 (μ(E))))
end equivalent_conditions
end portmanteau
|
d55ce4aefab9a38b51b538ab3da62ba5af09cd0a | b2fe74b11b57d362c13326bc5651244f111fa6f4 | /src/field_theory/perfect_closure.lean | f4ad7ec179bdf13dc171e730acf96a73c08f0f71 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | midfield/mathlib | c4db5fa898b5ac8f2f80ae0d00c95eb6f745f4c7 | 775edc615ecec631d65b6180dbcc7bc26c3abc26 | refs/heads/master | 1,675,330,551,921 | 1,608,304,514,000 | 1,608,304,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,680 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.char_p.basic
import data.equiv.ring
import algebra.group_with_zero.power
import algebra.iterate_hom
/-!
# The perfect closure of a field
-/
universes u v
open function
section defs
variables (K : Type u) [field K] (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime] [char_p K p]
/-- A perfect field is a field of characteristic p that has p-th root. -/
class perfect_field (K : Type u) [field K] (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime] [char_p K p] : Type u :=
(pth_root' : K → K)
(frobenius_pth_root' : ∀ x, frobenius K p (pth_root' x) = x)
/-- Frobenius automorphism of a perfect field. -/
def frobenius_equiv [perfect_field K p] : K ≃+* K :=
{ inv_fun := perfect_field.pth_root' p,
left_inv := λ x, frobenius_inj K p $ perfect_field.frobenius_pth_root' _,
right_inv := perfect_field.frobenius_pth_root',
.. frobenius K p }
/-- `p`-th root of a number in a `perfect_field` as a `ring_hom`. -/
def pth_root [perfect_field K p] : K →+* K :=
(frobenius_equiv K p).symm.to_ring_hom
end defs
section
variables {K : Type u} [field K] {L : Type v} [field L] (f : K →* L) (g : K →+* L)
{p : ℕ} [fact p.prime] [char_p K p] [perfect_field K p] [char_p L p] [perfect_field L p]
@[simp] lemma coe_frobenius_equiv : ⇑(frobenius_equiv K p) = frobenius K p := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_frobenius_equiv_symm : ⇑(frobenius_equiv K p).symm = pth_root K p := rfl
@[simp] theorem frobenius_pth_root (x : K) : frobenius K p (pth_root K p x) = x :=
(frobenius_equiv K p).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp] theorem pth_root_frobenius (x : K) : pth_root K p (frobenius K p x) = x :=
(frobenius_equiv K p).symm_apply_apply x
theorem left_inverse_pth_root_frobenius : left_inverse (pth_root K p) (frobenius K p) :=
pth_root_frobenius
theorem eq_pth_root_iff {x y : K} : x = pth_root K p y ↔ frobenius K p x = y :=
(frobenius_equiv K p).to_equiv.eq_symm_apply
theorem pth_root_eq_iff {x y : K} : pth_root K p x = y ↔ x = frobenius K p y :=
(frobenius_equiv K p).to_equiv.symm_apply_eq
theorem monoid_hom.map_pth_root (x : K) : f (pth_root K p x) = pth_root L p (f x) :=
eq_pth_root_iff.2 $ by rw [← f.map_frobenius, frobenius_pth_root]
theorem monoid_hom.map_iterate_pth_root (x : K) (n : ℕ) :
f (pth_root K p^[n] x) = (pth_root L p^[n] (f x)) :=
semiconj.iterate_right f.map_pth_root n x
theorem ring_hom.map_pth_root (x : K) :
g (pth_root K p x) = pth_root L p (g x) :=
g.to_monoid_hom.map_pth_root x
theorem ring_hom.map_iterate_pth_root (x : K) (n : ℕ) :
g (pth_root K p^[n] x) = (pth_root L p^[n] (g x)) :=
g.to_monoid_hom.map_iterate_pth_root x n
end
section
variables (K : Type u) [comm_ring K] (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime] [char_p K p]
/-- `perfect_closure K p` is the quotient by this relation. -/
@[mk_iff] inductive perfect_closure.r : (ℕ × K) → (ℕ × K) → Prop
| intro : ∀ n x, perfect_closure.r (n, x) (n+1, frobenius K p x)
/-- The perfect closure is the smallest extension that makes frobenius surjective. -/
def perfect_closure : Type u := quot (perfect_closure.r K p)
end
namespace perfect_closure
variables (K : Type u)
section ring
variables [comm_ring K] (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime] [char_p K p]
/-- Constructor for `perfect_closure`. -/
def mk (x : ℕ × K) : perfect_closure K p := quot.mk (r K p) x
@[simp] lemma quot_mk_eq_mk (x : ℕ × K) :
(quot.mk (r K p) x : perfect_closure K p) = mk K p x := rfl
variables {K p}
/-- Lift a function `ℕ × K → L` to a function on `perfect_closure K p`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def lift_on {L : Type*} (x : perfect_closure K p) (f : ℕ × K → L)
(hf : ∀ x y, r K p x y → f x = f y) : L :=
quot.lift_on x f hf
@[simp] lemma lift_on_mk {L : Sort*} (f : ℕ × K → L)
(hf : ∀ x y, r K p x y → f x = f y) (x : ℕ × K) :
(mk K p x).lift_on f hf = f x :=
rfl
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction_on (x : perfect_closure K p) {q : perfect_closure K p → Prop}
(h : ∀ x, q (mk K p x)) : q x :=
quot.induction_on x h
variables (K p)
private lemma mul_aux_left (x1 x2 y : ℕ × K) (H : r K p x1 x2) :
mk K p (x1.1 + y.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y.1] x1.2) * ((frobenius K p)^[x1.1] y.2)) =
mk K p (x2.1 + y.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y.1] x2.2) * ((frobenius K p)^[x2.1] y.2)) :=
match x1, x2, H with
| _, _, r.intro n x := quot.sound $ by rw [← iterate_succ_apply, iterate_succ',
iterate_succ', ← frobenius_mul, nat.succ_add]; apply r.intro
end
private lemma mul_aux_right (x y1 y2 : ℕ × K) (H : r K p y1 y2) :
mk K p (x.1 + y1.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y1.1] x.2) * ((frobenius K p)^[x.1] y1.2)) =
mk K p (x.1 + y2.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y2.1] x.2) * ((frobenius K p)^[x.1] y2.2)) :=
match y1, y2, H with
| _, _, r.intro n y := quot.sound $ by rw [← iterate_succ_apply, iterate_succ',
iterate_succ', ← frobenius_mul]; apply r.intro
end
instance : has_mul (perfect_closure K p) :=
⟨quot.lift (λ x:ℕ×K, quot.lift (λ y:ℕ×K, mk K p
(x.1 + y.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y.1] x.2) * ((frobenius K p)^[x.1] y.2))) (mul_aux_right K p x))
(λ x1 x2 (H : r K p x1 x2), funext $ λ e, quot.induction_on e $ λ y,
mul_aux_left K p x1 x2 y H)⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_mul_mk (x y : ℕ × K) :
mk K p x * mk K p y = mk K p
(x.1 + y.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y.1] x.2) * ((frobenius K p)^[x.1] y.2)) :=
rfl
instance : comm_monoid (perfect_closure K p) :=
{ mul_assoc := λ e f g, quot.induction_on e $ λ ⟨m, x⟩, quot.induction_on f $ λ ⟨n, y⟩,
quot.induction_on g $ λ ⟨s, z⟩, congr_arg (quot.mk _) $
by simp only [add_assoc, mul_assoc, ring_hom.iterate_map_mul,
← iterate_add_apply, add_comm, add_left_comm],
one := mk K p (0, 1),
one_mul := λ e, quot.induction_on e (λ ⟨n, x⟩, congr_arg (quot.mk _) $
by simp only [ring_hom.iterate_map_one, iterate_zero_apply, one_mul, zero_add]),
mul_one := λ e, quot.induction_on e (λ ⟨n, x⟩, congr_arg (quot.mk _) $
by simp only [ring_hom.iterate_map_one, iterate_zero_apply, mul_one, add_zero]),
mul_comm := λ e f, quot.induction_on e (λ ⟨m, x⟩, quot.induction_on f (λ ⟨n, y⟩,
congr_arg (quot.mk _) $ by simp only [add_comm, mul_comm])),
.. (infer_instance : has_mul (perfect_closure K p)) }
lemma one_def : (1 : perfect_closure K p) = mk K p (0, 1) := rfl
instance : inhabited (perfect_closure K p) := ⟨1⟩
private lemma add_aux_left (x1 x2 y : ℕ × K) (H : r K p x1 x2) :
mk K p (x1.1 + y.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y.1] x1.2) + ((frobenius K p)^[x1.1] y.2)) =
mk K p (x2.1 + y.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y.1] x2.2) + ((frobenius K p)^[x2.1] y.2)) :=
match x1, x2, H with
| _, _, r.intro n x := quot.sound $ by rw [← iterate_succ_apply, iterate_succ',
iterate_succ', ← frobenius_add, nat.succ_add]; apply r.intro
end
private lemma add_aux_right (x y1 y2 : ℕ × K) (H : r K p y1 y2) :
mk K p (x.1 + y1.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y1.1] x.2) + ((frobenius K p)^[x.1] y1.2)) =
mk K p (x.1 + y2.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y2.1] x.2) + ((frobenius K p)^[x.1] y2.2)) :=
match y1, y2, H with
| _, _, r.intro n y := quot.sound $ by rw [← iterate_succ_apply, iterate_succ',
iterate_succ', ← frobenius_add]; apply r.intro
end
instance : has_add (perfect_closure K p) :=
⟨quot.lift (λ x:ℕ×K, quot.lift (λ y:ℕ×K, mk K p
(x.1 + y.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y.1] x.2) + ((frobenius K p)^[x.1] y.2))) (add_aux_right K p x))
(λ x1 x2 (H : r K p x1 x2), funext $ λ e, quot.induction_on e $ λ y,
add_aux_left K p x1 x2 y H)⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_add_mk (x y : ℕ × K) :
mk K p x + mk K p y =
mk K p (x.1 + y.1, ((frobenius K p)^[y.1] x.2) + ((frobenius K p)^[x.1] y.2)) := rfl
instance : has_neg (perfect_closure K p) :=
⟨quot.lift (λ x:ℕ×K, mk K p (x.1, -x.2)) (λ x y (H : r K p x y), match x, y, H with
| _, _, r.intro n x := quot.sound $ by rw ← frobenius_neg; apply r.intro
end)⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_mk (x : ℕ × K) : - mk K p x = mk K p (x.1, -x.2) := rfl
instance : has_zero (perfect_closure K p) := ⟨mk K p (0, 0)⟩
lemma zero_def : (0 : perfect_closure K p) = mk K p (0, 0) := rfl
theorem mk_zero (n : ℕ) : mk K p (n, 0) = 0 :=
by induction n with n ih; [refl, rw ← ih]; symmetry; apply quot.sound;
have := r.intro n (0:K); rwa [frobenius_zero K p] at this
theorem r.sound (m n : ℕ) (x y : K) (H : frobenius K p^[m] x = y) :
mk K p (n, x) = mk K p (m + n, y) :=
by subst H; induction m with m ih; [simp only [zero_add, iterate_zero_apply],
rw [ih, nat.succ_add, iterate_succ']]; apply quot.sound; apply r.intro
instance : comm_ring (perfect_closure K p) :=
{ add_assoc := λ e f g, quot.induction_on e $ λ ⟨m, x⟩, quot.induction_on f $ λ ⟨n, y⟩,
quot.induction_on g $ λ ⟨s, z⟩, congr_arg (quot.mk _) $
by simp only [add_assoc, ring_hom.iterate_map_add,
← iterate_add_apply, add_comm, add_left_comm],
zero := 0,
zero_add := λ e, quot.induction_on e (λ ⟨n, x⟩, congr_arg (quot.mk _) $
by simp only [ring_hom.iterate_map_zero, iterate_zero_apply, zero_add]),
add_zero := λ e, quot.induction_on e (λ ⟨n, x⟩, congr_arg (quot.mk _) $
by simp only [ring_hom.iterate_map_zero, iterate_zero_apply, add_zero]),
sub_eq_add_neg := λ a b, rfl,
add_left_neg := λ e, quot.induction_on e (λ ⟨n, x⟩,
by simp only [quot_mk_eq_mk, neg_mk, mk_add_mk,
ring_hom.iterate_map_neg, add_left_neg, mk_zero]),
add_comm := λ e f, quot.induction_on e (λ ⟨m, x⟩, quot.induction_on f (λ ⟨n, y⟩,
congr_arg (quot.mk _) $ by simp only [add_comm])),
left_distrib := λ e f g, quot.induction_on e $ λ ⟨m, x⟩, quot.induction_on f $ λ ⟨n, y⟩,
quot.induction_on g $ λ ⟨s, z⟩, show quot.mk _ _ = quot.mk _ _,
by simp only [add_assoc, add_comm, add_left_comm]; apply r.sound;
simp only [ring_hom.iterate_map_mul, ring_hom.iterate_map_add,
← iterate_add_apply, mul_add, add_comm, add_left_comm],
right_distrib := λ e f g, quot.induction_on e $ λ ⟨m, x⟩, quot.induction_on f $ λ ⟨n, y⟩,
quot.induction_on g $ λ ⟨s, z⟩, show quot.mk _ _ = quot.mk _ _,
by simp only [add_assoc, add_comm _ s, add_left_comm _ s]; apply r.sound;
simp only [ring_hom.iterate_map_mul, ring_hom.iterate_map_add,
← iterate_add_apply, add_mul, add_comm, add_left_comm],
.. (infer_instance : has_add (perfect_closure K p)),
.. (infer_instance : has_neg (perfect_closure K p)),
.. (infer_instance : comm_monoid (perfect_closure K p)) }
theorem eq_iff' (x y : ℕ × K) : mk K p x = mk K p y ↔
∃ z, (frobenius K p^[y.1 + z] x.2) = (frobenius K p^[x.1 + z] y.2) :=
begin
split,
{ intro H,
replace H := quot.exact _ H,
induction H,
case eqv_gen.rel : x y H
{ cases H with n x, exact ⟨0, rfl⟩ },
case eqv_gen.refl : H
{ exact ⟨0, rfl⟩ },
case eqv_gen.symm : x y H ih
{ cases ih with w ih, exact ⟨w, ih.symm⟩ },
case eqv_gen.trans : x y z H1 H2 ih1 ih2
{ cases ih1 with z1 ih1,
cases ih2 with z2 ih2,
existsi z2+(y.1+z1),
rw [← add_assoc, iterate_add_apply, ih1],
rw [← iterate_add_apply, add_comm, iterate_add_apply, ih2],
rw [← iterate_add_apply],
simp only [add_comm, add_left_comm] } },
intro H,
cases x with m x,
cases y with n y,
cases H with z H, dsimp only at H,
rw [r.sound K p (n+z) m x _ rfl, r.sound K p (m+z) n y _ rfl, H],
rw [add_assoc, add_comm, add_comm z]
end
theorem nat_cast (n x : ℕ) : (x : perfect_closure K p) = mk K p (n, x) :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ induction x with x ih, {refl},
rw [nat.cast_succ, nat.cast_succ, ih], refl },
rw ih, apply quot.sound,
conv {congr, skip, skip, rw ← frobenius_nat_cast K p x},
apply r.intro
end
theorem int_cast (x : ℤ) : (x : perfect_closure K p) = mk K p (0, x) :=
by induction x; simp only [int.cast_of_nat, int.cast_neg_succ_of_nat, nat_cast K p 0]; refl
theorem nat_cast_eq_iff (x y : ℕ) : (x : perfect_closure K p) = y ↔ (x : K) = y :=
begin
split; intro H,
{ rw [nat_cast K p 0, nat_cast K p 0, eq_iff'] at H,
cases H with z H,
simpa only [zero_add, iterate_fixed (frobenius_nat_cast K p _)] using H },
rw [nat_cast K p 0, nat_cast K p 0, H]
end
instance : char_p (perfect_closure K p) p :=
begin
constructor, intro x, rw ← char_p.cast_eq_zero_iff K,
rw [← nat.cast_zero, nat_cast_eq_iff, nat.cast_zero]
end
theorem frobenius_mk (x : ℕ × K) :
(frobenius (perfect_closure K p) p : perfect_closure K p → perfect_closure K p)
(mk K p x) = mk _ _ (x.1, x.2^p) :=
begin
simp only [frobenius_def], cases x with n x, dsimp only,
suffices : ∀ p':ℕ, mk K p (n, x) ^ p' = mk K p (n, x ^ p'),
{ apply this },
intro p, induction p with p ih,
case nat.zero { apply r.sound, rw [(frobenius _ _).iterate_map_one, pow_zero] },
case nat.succ {
rw [pow_succ, ih],
symmetry,
apply r.sound,
simp only [pow_succ, (frobenius _ _).iterate_map_mul]
}
end
/-- Embedding of `K` into `perfect_closure K p` -/
def of : K →+* perfect_closure K p :=
{ to_fun := λ x, mk _ _ (0, x),
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ x y, rfl,
map_zero' := rfl,
map_add' := λ x y, rfl }
lemma of_apply (x : K) : of K p x = mk _ _ (0, x) := rfl
end ring
theorem eq_iff [integral_domain K] (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime] [char_p K p]
(x y : ℕ × K) : quot.mk (r K p) x = quot.mk (r K p) y ↔
(frobenius K p^[y.1] x.2) = (frobenius K p^[x.1] y.2) :=
(eq_iff' K p x y).trans ⟨λ ⟨z, H⟩, (frobenius_inj K p).iterate z $
by simpa only [add_comm, iterate_add] using H,
λ H, ⟨0, H⟩⟩
section field
variables [field K] (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime] [char_p K p]
instance : has_inv (perfect_closure K p) :=
⟨quot.lift (λ x:ℕ×K, quot.mk (r K p) (x.1, x.2⁻¹)) (λ x y (H : r K p x y), match x, y, H with
| _, _, r.intro n x := quot.sound $ by { simp only [frobenius_def], rw ← inv_pow', apply r.intro }
end)⟩
instance : field (perfect_closure K p) :=
{ exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, λ H, zero_ne_one ((eq_iff _ _ _ _).1 H)⟩,
mul_inv_cancel := λ e, induction_on e $ λ ⟨m, x⟩ H,
have _ := mt (eq_iff _ _ _ _).2 H, (eq_iff _ _ _ _).2
(by simp only [(frobenius _ _).iterate_map_one, (frobenius K p).iterate_map_zero,
iterate_zero_apply, ← (frobenius _ p).iterate_map_mul] at this ⊢;
rw [mul_inv_cancel this, (frobenius _ _).iterate_map_one]),
inv_zero := congr_arg (quot.mk (r K p)) (by rw [inv_zero]),
.. (infer_instance : has_inv (perfect_closure K p)),
.. (infer_instance : comm_ring (perfect_closure K p)) }
instance : perfect_field (perfect_closure K p) p :=
{ pth_root' := λ e, lift_on e (λ x, mk K p (x.1 + 1, x.2)) (λ x y H,
match x, y, H with
| _, _, r.intro n x := quot.sound (r.intro _ _)
end),
frobenius_pth_root' := λ e, induction_on e (λ ⟨n, x⟩,
by { simp only [lift_on_mk, frobenius_mk], exact (quot.sound $ r.intro _ _).symm }) }
theorem eq_pth_root (x : ℕ × K) :
mk K p x = (pth_root (perfect_closure K p) p^[x.1] (of K p x.2)) :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨m, x⟩,
induction m with m ih, {refl},
rw [iterate_succ_apply', ← ih]; refl
end
/-- Given a field `K` of characteristic `p` and a perfect field `L` of the same characteristic,
any homomorphism `K →+* L` can be lifted to `perfect_closure K p`. -/
def lift (L : Type v) [field L] [char_p L p] [perfect_field L p] :
(K →+* L) ≃ (perfect_closure K p →+* L) :=
begin
have := left_inverse_pth_root_frobenius.iterate,
refine_struct { .. },
field to_fun { intro f,
refine_struct { .. },
field to_fun { refine λ e, lift_on e (λ x, pth_root L p^[x.1] (f x.2)) _,
rintro a b ⟨n⟩,
simp only [f.map_frobenius, iterate_succ_apply, pth_root_frobenius] },
field map_one' { exact f.map_one },
field map_zero' { exact f.map_zero },
field map_mul' { rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩,
simp only [quot_mk_eq_mk, lift_on_mk, mk_mul_mk, ring_hom.map_iterate_frobenius,
ring_hom.iterate_map_mul, ring_hom.map_mul],
rw [iterate_add_apply, this _ _, add_comm, iterate_add_apply, this _ _] },
field map_add' { rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩,
simp only [quot_mk_eq_mk, lift_on_mk, mk_add_mk, ring_hom.map_iterate_frobenius,
ring_hom.iterate_map_add, ring_hom.map_add],
rw [iterate_add_apply, this _ _, add_comm x.1, iterate_add_apply, this _ _] } },
field inv_fun { exact λ f, f.comp (of K p) },
field left_inv { intro f, ext x, refl },
field right_inv { intro f, ext ⟨x⟩,
simp only [ring_hom.coe_mk, quot_mk_eq_mk, ring_hom.comp_apply, lift_on_mk],
rw [eq_pth_root, ring_hom.map_iterate_pth_root] }
end
end field
end perfect_closure
|
501a3928d730e517959c2c71d84f6b4d6fa552a0 | 584b714300690a5778b5de6cc00658b00d51a434 | /tmp/foo.lean | 4da90446d0c70f267b8d47226874c72e2944d4c1 | [] | no_license | cjmazey/practical-foundations-for-programming-languages | c11966b278ec51d26a257c43f753d79521227e25 | 0d498d7993d527c1002ee835616f3fe94f223a06 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,286,208,083 | 1,445,537,235,000 | 1,445,537,235,000 | 44,196,272 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,048 | lean | inductive exp : Type :=
| var : ℕ → exp
| num : ℕ → exp
| plus : exp → exp → exp
| times : exp → exp → exp
namespace exp
open nat
definition X := var 0
definition exp_ex1 : exp := plus (num 2) (times (num 3) X)
definition exp_ex2 : exp := plus (num 2) (times (num 3) (num 4))
theorem structural_induction :
∀ P : exp → Prop,
(∀ n : ℕ, P (var n)) →
(∀ n : ℕ, P (num n)) →
(∀ a₁ a₂ : exp, P a₁ → P a₂ → P (plus a₁ a₂)) →
(∀ a₁ a₂ : exp, P a₁ → P a₂ → P (times a₁ a₂)) →
∀ a : exp, P a :=
@exp.rec
end exp
namespace shuffling
inductive card : Type :=
| h : card
| s : card
| c : card
| d : card
open card
inductive stack : Type :=
| nil : stack
| cons : card → stack → stack
open stack
inductive unshuffle : stack → stack → stack → Prop :=
| unz : unshuffle nil nil nil
| unr : ∀ {s₁ s₂ s₃ : stack} (c : card), unshuffle s₁ s₂ s₃ →
unshuffle (cons c s₁) s₂ (cons c s₃)
| unl : ∀ {s₁ s₂ s₃ : stack} (c : card), unshuffle s₁ s₂ s₃ →
unshuffle (cons c s₁) (cons c s₂) s₃
open unshuffle
-- Task 2.1
example : unshuffle (cons h (cons s (cons s (cons d nil))))
(cons s (cons d nil))
(cons h (cons s nil)) :=
unr h (unl s (unr s (unl d unz)))
-- Task 2.2
example : unshuffle (cons h (cons s (cons s (cons d nil))))
(cons s (cons d nil))
(cons h (cons s nil)) :=
unr h (unr s (unl s (unl d unz)))
-- Task 2.3
example : ∀ s₁, ∃ s₂, ∃ s₃, unshuffle s₁ s₂ s₃ :=
λ s₁,
stack.induction_on s₁
(exists.intro nil (exists.intro nil unz))
(take c : card,
take t₁ : stack,
take H : ∃ t₂, ∃ t₃, unshuffle t₁ t₂ t₃,
obtain t₂ H', from H,
obtain t₃ H'', from H',
exists.intro (cons c t₂) (exists.intro t₃ (unl c H'')))
end shuffling
|
a8a63d1d602eb0d7814559d92e43f96f5a398a3a | 453dcd7c0d1ef170b0843a81d7d8caedc9741dce | /algebra/euclidean_domain.lean | d260819603edc55a63aeb953eae79b916f9745f4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | amswerdlow/mathlib | 9af77a1f08486d8fa059448ae2d97795bd12ec0c | 27f96e30b9c9bf518341705c99d641c38638dfd0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,200,953,598 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 144,564,700 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,534,156,197,000 | 1,534,156,197,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,885 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Louis Carlin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Louis Carlin, Mario Carneiro
Euclidean domains and Euclidean algorithm (extended to come)
A lot is based on pre-existing code in mathlib for natural number gcds
-/
import data.int.basic
universe u
class euclidean_domain (α : Type u) extends integral_domain α :=
(quotient : α → α → α)
(remainder : α → α → α)
-- This could be changed to the same order as int.mod_add_div.
-- We normally write qb+r rather than r + qb though.
(quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq : ∀ a b, b * quotient a b + remainder a b = a)
(r : α → α → Prop)
(r_well_founded : well_founded r)
(remainder_lt : ∀ a {b}, b ≠ 0 → r (remainder a b) b)
/- `val_le_mul_left` is often not a required in definitions of a euclidean
domain since given the other properties we can show there is a
(noncomputable) euclidean domain α with the property `val_le_mul_left`.
So potentially this definition could be split into two different ones
(euclidean_domain_weak and euclidean_domain_strong) with a noncomputable
function from weak to strong. I've currently divided the lemmas into
strong and weak depending on whether they require `val_le_mul_left` or not. -/
(mul_left_not_lt : ∀ a {b}, b ≠ 0 → ¬r (a * b) a)
namespace euclidean_domain
variable {α : Type u}
variables [euclidean_domain α]
local infix ` ≺ `:50 := euclidean_domain.r
instance : has_div α := ⟨quotient⟩
instance : has_mod α := ⟨remainder⟩
theorem div_add_mod (a b : α) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq _ _
theorem mod_lt : ∀ a {b : α}, b ≠ 0 → (a % b) ≺ b :=
remainder_lt
theorem mul_right_not_lt {a : α} (b) (h : a ≠ 0) : ¬(a * b) ≺ b :=
by rw mul_comm; exact mul_left_not_lt b h
lemma mul_div_cancel_left {a : α} (b) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a * b / a = b :=
eq.symm $ eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ classical.by_contradiction $ λ h,
begin
have := mul_left_not_lt a h,
rw [mul_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add'.2 (div_add_mod (a*b) a).symm] at this,
exact this (mod_lt _ a0)
end
lemma mul_div_cancel (a) {b : α} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a * b / b = a :=
by rw mul_comm; exact mul_div_cancel_left a b0
@[simp] lemma mod_zero (a : α) : a % 0 = a :=
by simpa using div_add_mod a 0
@[simp] lemma mod_eq_zero {a b : α} : a % b = 0 ↔ b ∣ a :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← div_add_mod a b]; simp [h],
λ ⟨c, e⟩, begin
rw [e, ← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, add_zero],
haveI := classical.dec,
by_cases b0 : b = 0; simp [b0, mul_div_cancel_left],
end⟩
@[simp] lemma mod_self (a : α) : a % a = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 (dvd_refl _)
lemma dvd_mod_iff {a b c : α} (h : c ∣ b) : c ∣ a % b ↔ c ∣ a :=
by rw [dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h _), div_add_mod]
lemma lt_one (a : α) : a ≺ (1:α) → a = 0 :=
by haveI := classical.dec; exact
not_imp_not.1 (λ h, by simpa using mul_left_not_lt 1 h)
lemma val_dvd_le : ∀ a b : α, b ∣ a → a ≠ 0 → ¬a ≺ b
| _ b ⟨d, rfl⟩ ha := mul_left_not_lt b (λ h, by simpa [h] using ha)
@[simp] lemma mod_one (a : α) : a % 1 = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp] lemma zero_mod (b : α) : 0 % b = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 (dvd_zero _)
@[simp] lemma zero_div {a : α} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : 0 / a = 0 :=
by simpa using mul_div_cancel 0 a0
@[simp] lemma div_self {a : α} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 :=
by simpa using mul_div_cancel 1 a0
section gcd
variable [decidable_eq α]
def gcd : α → α → α
| a := λ b, if a0 : a = 0 then b else
have h:_ := mod_lt b a0,
gcd (b%a) a
using_well_founded {dec_tac := tactic.assumption,
rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, r_well_founded α⟩]}
@[simp] theorem gcd_zero_left (a : α) : gcd 0 a = a :=
by rw gcd; simp
@[simp] theorem gcd_zero_right (a : α) : gcd a 0 = a :=
by rw gcd; by_cases a0 : a = 0; simp [a0]
theorem gcd_val (a b : α) : gcd a b = gcd (b % a) a :=
by rw gcd; by_cases a0 : a = 0; simp [a0]
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem gcd.induction {P : α → α → Prop} : ∀ a b : α,
(∀ x, P 0 x) →
(∀ a b, a ≠ 0 → P (b % a) a → P a b) →
P a b
| a := λ b H0 H1, if a0 : a = 0 then by simp [a0, H0] else
have h:_ := mod_lt b a0,
H1 _ _ a0 (gcd.induction (b%a) a H0 H1)
using_well_founded {dec_tac := tactic.assumption,
rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, r_well_founded α⟩]}
theorem gcd_dvd (a b : α) : gcd a b ∣ a ∧ gcd a b ∣ b :=
gcd.induction a b
(λ b, by simp)
(λ a b aneq ⟨IH₁, IH₂⟩,
by rw gcd_val; exact
⟨IH₂, (dvd_mod_iff IH₂).1 IH₁⟩)
theorem gcd_dvd_left (a b : α) : gcd a b ∣ a := (gcd_dvd a b).left
theorem gcd_dvd_right (a b : α) : gcd a b ∣ b := (gcd_dvd a b).right
theorem dvd_gcd {a b c : α} : c ∣ a → c ∣ b → c ∣ gcd a b :=
gcd.induction a b
(by simp {contextual := tt})
(λ a b a0 IH ca cb,
by rw gcd_val; exact
IH ((dvd_mod_iff ca).2 cb) ca)
theorem gcd_eq_left {a b : α} : gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨λ h, by rw ← h; apply gcd_dvd_right,
λ h, by rw [gcd_val, mod_eq_zero.2 h, gcd_zero_left]⟩
@[simp] theorem gcd_one_left (a : α) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
gcd_eq_left.2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp] theorem gcd_self (a : α) : gcd a a = a :=
gcd_eq_left.2 (dvd_refl _)
end gcd
instance : euclidean_domain ℤ :=
{ quotient := (/),
remainder := (%),
quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq := λ a b, by rw add_comm; exact int.mod_add_div _ _,
r := λ a b, a.nat_abs < b.nat_abs,
r_well_founded := measure_wf (λ a, int.nat_abs a),
remainder_lt := λ a b b0, int.coe_nat_lt.1 $
by rw [int.nat_abs_of_nonneg (int.mod_nonneg _ b0), ← int.abs_eq_nat_abs];
exact int.mod_lt _ b0,
mul_left_not_lt := λ a b b0, not_lt_of_ge $
by rw [← mul_one a.nat_abs, int.nat_abs_mul];
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (int.nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero b0) (nat.zero_le _) }
end euclidean_domain |
2d87f493f9d79179192e6351d90a1d66b72ddbe3 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/linear_algebra/annihilating_polynomial.lean | 26a8531effd2360dcc54eb0373635efc71785817 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,743 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Justin Thomas. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Justin Thomas
-/
import field_theory.minpoly.field
import ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain
/-!
# Annihilating Ideal
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Given a commutative ring `R` and an `R`-algebra `A`
Every element `a : A` defines
an ideal `polynomial.ann_ideal a ⊆ R[X]`.
Simply put, this is the set of polynomials `p` where
the polynomial evaluation `p(a)` is 0.
## Special case where the ground ring is a field
In the special case that `R` is a field, we use the notation `R = 𝕜`.
Here `𝕜[X]` is a PID, so there is a polynomial `g ∈ polynomial.ann_ideal a`
which generates the ideal. We show that if this generator is
chosen to be monic, then it is the minimal polynomial of `a`,
as defined in `field_theory.minpoly`.
## Special case: endomorphism algebra
Given an `R`-module `M` (`[add_comm_group M] [module R M]`)
there are some common specializations which may be more familiar.
* Example 1: `A = M →ₗ[R] M`, the endomorphism algebra of an `R`-module M.
* Example 2: `A = n × n` matrices with entries in `R`.
-/
open_locale polynomial
namespace polynomial
section semiring
variables {R A : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables (R)
/-- `ann_ideal R a` is the *annihilating ideal* of all `p : R[X]` such that `p(a) = 0`.
The informal notation `p(a)` stand for `polynomial.aeval a p`.
Again informally, the annihilating ideal of `a` is
`{ p ∈ R[X] | p(a) = 0 }`. This is an ideal in `R[X]`.
The formal definition uses the kernel of the aeval map. -/
noncomputable def ann_ideal (a : A) : ideal R[X] :=
((aeval a).to_ring_hom : R[X] →+* A).ker
variables {R}
/-- It is useful to refer to ideal membership sometimes
and the annihilation condition other times. -/
lemma mem_ann_ideal_iff_aeval_eq_zero {a : A} {p : R[X]} :
p ∈ ann_ideal R a ↔ aeval a p = 0 :=
iff.rfl
end semiring
section field
variables {𝕜 A : Type*} [field 𝕜] [ring A] [algebra 𝕜 A]
variable (𝕜)
open submodule
/-- `ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a` is the monic generator of `ann_ideal 𝕜 a`
if one exists, otherwise `0`.
Since `𝕜[X]` is a principal ideal domain there is a polynomial `g` such that
`span 𝕜 {g} = ann_ideal a`. This picks some generator.
We prefer the monic generator of the ideal. -/
noncomputable def ann_ideal_generator (a : A) : 𝕜[X] :=
let g := is_principal.generator $ ann_ideal 𝕜 a
in g * (C g.leading_coeff⁻¹)
section
variables {𝕜}
@[simp] lemma ann_ideal_generator_eq_zero_iff {a : A} :
ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a = 0 ↔ ann_ideal 𝕜 a = ⊥ :=
by simp only [ann_ideal_generator, mul_eq_zero, is_principal.eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero,
polynomial.C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, polynomial.leading_coeff_eq_zero, or_self]
end
/-- `ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a` is indeed a generator. -/
@[simp] lemma span_singleton_ann_ideal_generator (a : A) :
ideal.span {ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a} = ann_ideal 𝕜 a :=
begin
by_cases h : ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a = 0,
{ rw [h, ann_ideal_generator_eq_zero_iff.mp h, set.singleton_zero, ideal.span_zero] },
{ rw [ann_ideal_generator, ideal.span_singleton_mul_right_unit, ideal.span_singleton_generator],
apply polynomial.is_unit_C.mpr,
apply is_unit.mk0,
apply inv_eq_zero.not.mpr,
apply polynomial.leading_coeff_eq_zero.not.mpr,
apply (mul_ne_zero_iff.mp h).1 }
end
/-- The annihilating ideal generator is a member of the annihilating ideal. -/
lemma ann_ideal_generator_mem (a : A) : ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a ∈ ann_ideal 𝕜 a :=
ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ (submodule.is_principal.generator_mem _)
lemma mem_iff_eq_smul_ann_ideal_generator {p : 𝕜[X]} (a : A) :
p ∈ ann_ideal 𝕜 a ↔ ∃ s : 𝕜[X], p = s • ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a :=
by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ p, ← mem_span_singleton, ← span_singleton_ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a,
ideal.span]
/-- The generator we chose for the annihilating ideal is monic when the ideal is non-zero. -/
lemma monic_ann_ideal_generator (a : A) (hg : ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a ≠ 0) :
monic (ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a) :=
monic_mul_leading_coeff_inv (mul_ne_zero_iff.mp hg).1
/-! We are working toward showing the generator of the annihilating ideal
in the field case is the minimal polynomial. We are going to use a uniqueness
theorem of the minimal polynomial.
This is the first condition: it must annihilate the original element `a : A`. -/
lemma ann_ideal_generator_aeval_eq_zero (a : A) :
aeval a (ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a) = 0 :=
mem_ann_ideal_iff_aeval_eq_zero.mp (ann_ideal_generator_mem 𝕜 a)
variables {𝕜}
lemma mem_iff_ann_ideal_generator_dvd {p : 𝕜[X]} {a : A} :
p ∈ ann_ideal 𝕜 a ↔ ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a ∣ p :=
by rw [← ideal.mem_span_singleton, span_singleton_ann_ideal_generator]
/-- The generator of the annihilating ideal has minimal degree among
the non-zero members of the annihilating ideal -/
lemma degree_ann_ideal_generator_le_of_mem (a : A) (p : 𝕜[X])
(hp : p ∈ ann_ideal 𝕜 a) (hpn0 : p ≠ 0) :
degree (ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a) ≤ degree p :=
degree_le_of_dvd (mem_iff_ann_ideal_generator_dvd.1 hp) hpn0
variables (𝕜)
/-- The generator of the annihilating ideal is the minimal polynomial. -/
lemma ann_ideal_generator_eq_minpoly (a : A) :
ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a = minpoly 𝕜 a :=
begin
by_cases h : ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a = 0,
{ rw [h, minpoly.eq_zero],
rintro ⟨p, p_monic, (hp : aeval a p = 0)⟩,
refine p_monic.ne_zero (ideal.mem_bot.mp _),
simpa only [ann_ideal_generator_eq_zero_iff.mp h]
using mem_ann_ideal_iff_aeval_eq_zero.mpr hp },
{ exact minpoly.unique _ _
(monic_ann_ideal_generator _ _ h)
(ann_ideal_generator_aeval_eq_zero _ _)
(λ q q_monic hq, (degree_ann_ideal_generator_le_of_mem a q
(mem_ann_ideal_iff_aeval_eq_zero.mpr hq)
q_monic.ne_zero)) }
end
/-- If a monic generates the annihilating ideal, it must match our choice
of the annihilating ideal generator. -/
lemma monic_generator_eq_minpoly (a : A) (p : 𝕜[X])
(p_monic : p.monic) (p_gen : ideal.span {p} = ann_ideal 𝕜 a) :
ann_ideal_generator 𝕜 a = p :=
begin
by_cases h : p = 0,
{ rwa [h, ann_ideal_generator_eq_zero_iff, ← p_gen, ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mpr], },
{ rw [← span_singleton_ann_ideal_generator, ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at p_gen,
rw eq_comm,
apply eq_of_monic_of_associated p_monic _ p_gen,
{ apply monic_ann_ideal_generator _ _ ((associated.ne_zero_iff p_gen).mp h), }, },
end
end field
end polynomial
|
ef2ec06d192fe74b95239d7afe985b83816881d0 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/analysis/normed_space/inner_product.lean | d5e145cdbd5f4351c87e33935d0a2df03c4b9639 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 77,975 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import linear_algebra.bilinear_form
import linear_algebra.sesquilinear_form
import analysis.special_functions.pow
import topology.metric_space.pi_Lp
import data.complex.is_R_or_C
/-!
# Inner Product Space
This file defines inner product spaces and proves its basic properties.
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an inner product. It generalizes the notion of
dot product in `ℝ^n` and provides the means of defining the length of a vector and the angle between
two vectors. In particular vectors `x` and `y` are orthogonal if their inner product equals zero.
We define both the real and complex cases at the same time using the `is_R_or_C` typeclass.
## Main results
- We define the class `inner_product_space 𝕜 E` extending `normed_space 𝕜 E` with a number of basic
properties, most notably the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Here `𝕜` is understood to be either `ℝ`
or `ℂ`, through the `is_R_or_C` typeclass.
- We show that if `f i` is an inner product space for each `i`, then so is `Π i, f i`
- We define `euclidean_space 𝕜 n` to be `n → 𝕜` for any `fintype n`, and show that
this an inner product space.
- Existence of orthogonal projection onto nonempty complete subspace:
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a unique `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
The point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
## Notation
We globally denote the real and complex inner products by `⟪·, ·⟫_ℝ` and `⟪·, ·⟫_ℂ` respectively.
We also provide two notation namespaces: `real_inner_product_space`, `complex_inner_product_space`,
which respectively introduce the plain notation `⟪·, ·⟫` for the the real and complex inner product.
## Implementation notes
We choose the convention that inner products are conjugate linear in the first argument and linear
in the second.
## TODO
- Fix the section on the existence of minimizers and orthogonal projections to make sure that it
also applies in the complex case.
## Tags
inner product space, norm
## References
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable theory
open is_R_or_C real
open_locale big_operators classical
variables {𝕜 E F : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜]
local notation `𝓚` := @is_R_or_C.of_real 𝕜 _
/-- Syntactic typeclass for types endowed with an inner product -/
class has_inner (𝕜 E : Type*) := (inner : E → E → 𝕜)
export has_inner (inner)
notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫_ℝ` := @inner ℝ _ _ x y
notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫_ℂ` := @inner ℂ _ _ x y
section notations
localized "notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner ℝ _ _ x y" in real_inner_product_space
localized "notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner ℂ _ _ x y" in complex_inner_product_space
end notations
/--
An inner product space is a vector space with an additional operation called inner product.
The norm could be derived from the inner product, instead we require the existence of a norm and
the fact that `∥x∥^2 = re ⟪x, x⟫` to be able to put instances on `𝕂` or product
spaces.
To construct a norm from an inner product, see `inner_product_space.of_core`.
-/
class inner_product_space (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [is_R_or_C 𝕜]
extends normed_group E, normed_space 𝕜 E, has_inner 𝕜 E :=
(norm_sq_eq_inner : ∀ (x : E), ∥x∥^2 = re (inner x x))
(conj_sym : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y)
(nonneg_im : ∀ x, im (inner x x) = 0)
(add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z)
(smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = (conj r) * inner x y)
/- This instance generates the type-class problem `inner_product_space ?m E` when looking for
`normed_group E`. However, since `?m` can only ever be `ℝ` or `ℂ`, this should not cause
problems. -/
attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] inner_product_space.to_normed_group
/-!
### Constructing a normed space structure from an inner product
In the definition of an inner product space, we require the existence of a norm, which is equal
(but maybe not defeq) to the square root of the scalar product. This makes it possible to put
an inner product space structure on spaces with a preexisting norm (for instance `ℝ`), with good
properties. However, sometimes, one would like to define the norm starting only from a well-behaved
scalar product. This is what we implement in this paragraph, starting from a structure
`inner_product_space.core` stating that we have a nice scalar product.
Our goal here is not to develop a whole theory with all the supporting API, as this will be done
below for `inner_product_space`. Instead, we implement the bare minimum to go as directly as
possible to the construction of the norm and the proof of the triangular inequality.
Warning: Do not use this `core` structure if the space you are interested in already has a norm
instance defined on it, otherwise this will create a second non-defeq norm instance!
-/
/-- A structure requiring that a scalar product is positive definite and symmetric, from which one
can construct an `inner_product_space` instance in `inner_product_space.of_core`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure inner_product_space.core
(𝕜 : Type*) (F : Type*)
[is_R_or_C 𝕜] [add_comm_group F] [semimodule 𝕜 F] :=
(inner : F → F → 𝕜)
(conj_sym : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y)
(nonneg_im : ∀ x, im (inner x x) = 0)
(nonneg_re : ∀ x, re (inner x x) ≥ 0)
(definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0)
(add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z)
(smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = (conj r) * inner x y)
/- We set `inner_product_space.core` to be a class as we will use it as such in the construction
of the normed space structure that it produces. However, all the instances we will use will be
local to this proof. -/
attribute [class] inner_product_space.core
namespace inner_product_space.of_core
variables [add_comm_group F] [semimodule 𝕜 F] [c : inner_product_space.core 𝕜 F]
include c
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner 𝕜 F _ x y
local notation `𝓚` := @is_R_or_C.of_real 𝕜 _
local notation `norm_sqK` := @is_R_or_C.norm_sq 𝕜 _
local notation `reK` := @is_R_or_C.re 𝕜 _
local notation `ext_iff` := @is_R_or_C.ext_iff 𝕜 _
local postfix `†`:90 := @is_R_or_C.conj 𝕜 _
/-- Inner product defined by the `inner_product_space.core` structure. -/
def to_has_inner : has_inner 𝕜 F := { inner := c.inner }
local attribute [instance] to_has_inner
/-- The norm squared function for `inner_product_space.core` structure. -/
def norm_sq (x : F) := reK ⟪x, x⟫
local notation `norm_sqF` := @norm_sq 𝕜 F _ _ _ _
lemma inner_conj_sym (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ := c.conj_sym x y
lemma inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ := c.nonneg_re _
lemma inner_self_nonneg_im {x : F} : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := c.nonneg_im _
lemma inner_self_im_zero {x : F} : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := c.nonneg_im _
lemma inner_add_left {x y z : F} : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
c.add_left _ _ _
lemma inner_add_right {x y z : F} : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_add_left, ring_hom.map_add]; simp only [inner_conj_sym]
lemma inner_norm_sq_eq_inner_self (x : F) : 𝓚 (norm_sqF x) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
begin
rw ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp only [of_real_re]; refl, by simp only [inner_self_nonneg_im, of_real_im]⟩
end
lemma inner_re_symm {x y : F} : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_re]
lemma inner_im_symm {x y : F} : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_im]
lemma inner_smul_left {x y : F} {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.smul_left _ _ _
lemma inner_smul_right {x y : F} {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_smul_left]; simp only [conj_conj, inner_conj_sym, ring_hom.map_mul]
lemma inner_zero_left {x : F} : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [←zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : F), inner_smul_left]; simp only [zero_mul, ring_hom.map_zero]
lemma inner_zero_right {x : F} : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_zero_left]; simp only [ring_hom.map_zero]
lemma inner_self_eq_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
iff.intro (c.definite _) (by { rintro rfl, exact inner_zero_left })
lemma inner_self_re_to_K {x : F} : 𝓚 (re ⟪x, x⟫) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by norm_num [ext_iff, inner_self_nonneg_im]
lemma inner_abs_conj_sym {x y : F} : abs ⟪x, y⟫ = abs ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, abs_conj]
lemma inner_neg_left {x y : F} : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ :=
by { rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left], simp }
lemma inner_neg_right {x y : F} : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_neg_left]; simp only [ring_hom.map_neg, inner_conj_sym]
lemma inner_sub_left {x y z : F} : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left, inner_neg_left] }
lemma inner_sub_right {x y z : F} : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right, inner_neg_right] }
lemma inner_mul_conj_re_abs {x y : F} : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = abs (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) :=
by { rw[←inner_conj_sym, mul_comm], exact re_eq_abs_of_mul_conj (inner y x), }
/-- Expand `inner (x + y) (x + y)` -/
lemma inner_add_add_self {x y : F} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/- Expand `inner (x - y) (x - y)` -/
lemma inner_sub_sub_self {x y : F} : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/--
Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. This proof follows "Proof 2" on Wikipedia.
We need this for the `core` structure to prove the triangle inequality below when
showing the core is a normed group.
-/
lemma inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
begin
by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ rw [hy], simp only [is_R_or_C.abs_zero, inner_zero_left, mul_zero, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] },
{ change y ≠ 0 at hy,
have hy' : ⟪y, y⟫ ≠ 0 := λ h, by rw [inner_self_eq_zero] at h; exact hy h,
set T := ⟪y, x⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫ with hT,
have h₁ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = re ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_re_symm,
have h₂ : im ⟪y, x⟫ = -im ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_im_symm,
have h₃ : ⟪y, x⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ / (⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫) = ⟪y, x⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫,
{ rw [mul_div_assoc],
have : ⟪y, y⟫ / (⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫) = 1 / ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_self hy', one_mul],
rw [this, div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, ←div_eq_mul_inv] },
have h₄ : ⟪y, y⟫ = 𝓚 (re ⟪y, y⟫) := by simp only [inner_self_re_to_K],
have h₅ : re ⟪y, y⟫ > 0,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne inner_self_nonneg _,
intro H,
apply hy',
rw ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp [H],by simp [inner_self_nonneg_im]⟩ },
have h₆ : re ⟪y, y⟫ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt h₅,
have hmain := calc
0 ≤ re ⟪x - T • y, x - T • y⟫
: inner_self_nonneg
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re ⟪T • y, x⟫ - re ⟪x, T • y⟫ + re ⟪T • y, T • y⟫
: by simp [inner_sub_sub_self, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, h₁, h₂]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (T† * ⟪y, x⟫) - re (T * ⟪x, y⟫) + re (T * T† * ⟪y, y⟫)
: by simp [inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, mul_assoc]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫)
: by field_simp [-mul_re, inner_conj_sym, hT, conj_div, h₁, h₃]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫)
: by rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div_comm, ←mul_div_assoc]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫ / 𝓚 (re ⟪y, y⟫))
: by conv_lhs { rw [h₄] }
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw [div_re_of_real]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - abs (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw [inner_mul_conj_re_abs]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw is_R_or_C.abs_mul,
have hmain' : abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ := by linarith,
have := (mul_le_mul_right h₅).mpr hmain',
rwa [div_mul_cancel (abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫) h₆] at this }
end
/-- Norm constructed from a `inner_product_space.core` structure, defined to be the square root
of the scalar product. -/
def to_has_norm : has_norm F :=
{ norm := λ x, sqrt (re ⟪x, x⟫) }
local attribute [instance] to_has_norm
lemma norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : F) : ∥x∥ = sqrt (re ⟪x, x⟫) := rfl
lemma inner_self_eq_norm_square (x : F) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ :=
by rw[norm_eq_sqrt_inner, ←sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
lemma sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm {x : F} : sqrt (norm_sqF x) = ∥x∥ := rfl
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
lemma abs_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : abs ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le (mul_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _))
begin
have H : ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ * (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = re ⟪y, y⟫ * re ⟪x, x⟫,
{ simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_square], ring, },
rw H,
conv
begin
to_lhs, congr, rw[inner_abs_conj_sym],
end,
exact inner_mul_inner_self_le y x,
end
/-- Normed group structure constructed from an `inner_product_space.core` structure -/
def to_normed_group : normed_group F :=
normed_group.of_core F
{ norm_eq_zero_iff := assume x,
begin
split,
{ intro H,
change sqrt (re ⟪x, x⟫) = 0 at H,
rw [sqrt_eq_zero inner_self_nonneg] at H,
apply (inner_self_eq_zero : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0).mp,
rw ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp [H], by simp [inner_self_im_zero]⟩ },
{ rintro rfl,
change sqrt (re ⟪0, 0⟫) = 0,
simp only [sqrt_zero, inner_zero_right, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] }
end,
triangle := assume x y,
begin
have h₁ : abs ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ := abs_inner_le_norm _ _,
have h₂ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ abs ⟪x, y⟫ := re_le_abs _,
have h₃ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ := by linarith,
have h₄ : re ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ := by rwa [←inner_conj_sym, conj_re],
have : ∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ ≤ (∥x∥ + ∥y∥) * (∥x∥ + ∥y∥),
{ simp [←inner_self_eq_norm_square, inner_add_add_self, add_mul, mul_add, mul_comm],
linarith },
exact nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le (add_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) this
end,
norm_neg := λ x, by simp only [norm, inner_neg_left, neg_neg, inner_neg_right] }
local attribute [instance] to_normed_group
/-- Normed space structure constructed from a `inner_product_space.core` structure -/
def to_normed_space : normed_space 𝕜 F :=
{ norm_smul_le := assume r x,
begin
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, ←mul_assoc],
rw [conj_mul_eq_norm_sq_left, of_real_mul_re, sqrt_mul, ←inner_norm_sq_eq_inner_self, of_real_re],
{ simp [sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm, is_R_or_C.sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm] },
{ exact norm_sq_nonneg r }
end }
end inner_product_space.of_core
/-- Given a `inner_product_space.core` structure on a space, one can use it to turn
the space into an inner product space, constructing the norm out of the inner product -/
def inner_product_space.of_core [add_comm_group F] [semimodule 𝕜 F]
(c : inner_product_space.core 𝕜 F) : inner_product_space 𝕜 F :=
begin
letI : normed_group F := @inner_product_space.of_core.to_normed_group 𝕜 F _ _ _ c,
letI : normed_space 𝕜 F := @inner_product_space.of_core.to_normed_space 𝕜 F _ _ _ c,
exact { norm_sq_eq_inner := λ x,
begin
have h₁ : ∥x∥^2 = (sqrt (re (c.inner x x))) ^ 2 := rfl,
have h₂ : 0 ≤ re (c.inner x x) := inner_product_space.of_core.inner_self_nonneg,
simp [h₁, sqr_sqrt, h₂],
end,
..c }
end
/-! ### Properties of inner product spaces -/
variables [inner_product_space 𝕜 E] [inner_product_space ℝ F]
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation `IK` := @is_R_or_C.I 𝕜 _
local notation `absR` := _root_.abs
local postfix `†`:90 := @is_R_or_C.conj 𝕜 _
local postfix `⋆`:90 := complex.conj
export inner_product_space (norm_sq_eq_inner)
section basic_properties
lemma inner_conj_sym (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_product_space.conj_sym _ _
lemma real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := inner_conj_sym x y
lemma inner_eq_zero_sym {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 :=
⟨λ h, by simp [←inner_conj_sym, h], λ h, by simp [←inner_conj_sym, h]⟩
lemma inner_self_nonneg_im {x : E} : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := inner_product_space.nonneg_im _
lemma inner_self_im_zero {x : E} : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := inner_product_space.nonneg_im _
lemma inner_add_left {x y z : E} : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
inner_product_space.add_left _ _ _
lemma inner_add_right {x y z : E} : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ :=
begin
rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_add_left, ring_hom.map_add],
conv_rhs { rw ←inner_conj_sym, conv { congr, skip, rw ←inner_conj_sym } }
end
lemma inner_re_symm {x y : E} : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_re]
lemma inner_im_symm {x y : E} : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_im]
lemma inner_smul_left {x y : E} {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_product_space.smul_left _ _ _
lemma real_inner_smul_left {x y : F} {r : ℝ} : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := inner_smul_left
lemma inner_smul_right {x y : E} {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_smul_left, ring_hom.map_mul, conj_conj, inner_conj_sym]
lemma real_inner_smul_right {x y : F} {r : ℝ} : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := inner_smul_right
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form. -/
def sesq_form_of_inner : sesq_form 𝕜 E conj_to_ring_equiv :=
{ sesq := λ x y, ⟪y, x⟫, -- Note that sesquilinear forms are linear in the first argument
sesq_add_left := λ x y z, inner_add_right,
sesq_add_right := λ x y z, inner_add_left,
sesq_smul_left := λ r x y, inner_smul_right,
sesq_smul_right := λ r x y, inner_smul_left }
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form. -/
def bilin_form_of_real_inner : bilin_form ℝ F :=
{ bilin := inner,
bilin_add_left := λ x y z, inner_add_left,
bilin_smul_left := λ a x y, inner_smul_left,
bilin_add_right := λ x y z, inner_add_right,
bilin_smul_right := λ a x y, inner_smul_right }
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
lemma sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i in s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i in s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
sesq_form.map_sum_right (sesq_form_of_inner) _ _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
lemma inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i in s, f i⟫ = ∑ i in s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
sesq_form.map_sum_left (sesq_form_of_inner) _ _ _
@[simp] lemma inner_zero_left {x : E} : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0:E), inner_smul_left, ring_hom.map_zero, zero_mul]
lemma inner_re_zero_left {x : E} : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 :=
by simp only [inner_zero_left, add_monoid_hom.map_zero]
@[simp] lemma inner_zero_right {x : E} : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_zero_left, ring_hom.map_zero]
lemma inner_re_zero_right {x : E} : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 :=
by simp only [inner_zero_right, add_monoid_hom.map_zero]
lemma inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by rw [←norm_sq_eq_inner]; exact pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) 2
lemma real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ := @inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ x
@[simp] lemma inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have h₁ : re ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw is_R_or_C.ext_iff at h; simp [h.1],
rw [←norm_sq_eq_inner x] at h₁,
rw [←norm_eq_zero],
exact pow_eq_zero h₁ },
{ rintro rfl,
exact inner_zero_left }
end
@[simp] lemma inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
rw ←inner_self_eq_zero,
have H₁ : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≥ 0, exact inner_self_nonneg,
have H₂ : re ⟪x, x⟫ = 0, exact le_antisymm h H₁,
rw is_R_or_C.ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp [H₂], by simp [inner_self_nonneg_im]⟩ },
{ rintro rfl,
simp only [inner_zero_left, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] }
end
lemma real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
by { have h := @inner_self_nonpos ℝ F _ _ x, simpa using h }
@[simp] lemma inner_self_re_to_K {x : E} : 𝓚 (re ⟪x, x⟫) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by rw is_R_or_C.ext_iff; exact ⟨by simp, by simp [inner_self_nonneg_im]⟩
lemma inner_self_re_abs {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ = abs ⟪x, x⟫ :=
begin
have H : ⟪x, x⟫ = 𝓚 (re ⟪x, x⟫) + 𝓚 (im ⟪x, x⟫) * I,
{ rw re_add_im, },
rw [H, is_add_hom.map_add re (𝓚 (re ⟪x, x⟫)) ((𝓚 (im ⟪x, x⟫)) * I)],
rw [mul_re, I_re, mul_zero, I_im, zero_sub, tactic.ring.add_neg_eq_sub],
rw [of_real_re, of_real_im, sub_zero, inner_self_nonneg_im],
simp only [abs_of_real, add_zero, of_real_zero, zero_mul],
exact (_root_.abs_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg).symm,
end
lemma inner_self_abs_to_K {x : E} : 𝓚 (abs ⟪x, x⟫) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by { rw[←inner_self_re_abs], exact inner_self_re_to_K }
lemma real_inner_self_abs {x : F} : absR ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
by { have h := @inner_self_abs_to_K ℝ F _ _ x, simpa using h }
lemma inner_abs_conj_sym {x y : E} : abs ⟪x, y⟫ = abs ⟪y, x⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, abs_conj]
@[simp] lemma inner_neg_left {x y : E} : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ :=
by { rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left], simp }
@[simp] lemma inner_neg_right {x y : E} : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ :=
by rw [←inner_conj_sym, inner_neg_left]; simp only [ring_hom.map_neg, inner_conj_sym]
lemma inner_neg_neg {x y : E} : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
@[simp] lemma inner_self_conj {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
by rw [is_R_or_C.ext_iff]; exact ⟨by rw [conj_re], by rw [conj_im, inner_self_im_zero, neg_zero]⟩
lemma inner_sub_left {x y z : E} : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left] }
lemma inner_sub_right {x y z : E} : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ :=
by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right] }
lemma inner_mul_conj_re_abs {x y : E} : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = abs (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) :=
by { rw[←inner_conj_sym, mul_comm], exact re_eq_abs_of_mul_conj (inner y x), }
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
lemma inner_add_add_self {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
lemma real_inner_add_add_self {x y : F} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
begin
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [←inner_conj_sym]; refl,
simp [inner_add_add_self, this],
ring,
end
/- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫` -/
lemma inner_sub_sub_self {x y : E} : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
lemma real_inner_sub_sub_self {x y : F} : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
begin
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [←inner_conj_sym]; refl,
simp [inner_sub_sub_self, this],
ring,
end
/-- Parallelogram law -/
lemma parallelogram_law {x y : E} :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) :=
by simp [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self, two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. This proof follows "Proof 2" on Wikipedia. -/
lemma inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
begin
by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ rw [hy], simp only [is_R_or_C.abs_zero, inner_zero_left, mul_zero, add_monoid_hom.map_zero] },
{ change y ≠ 0 at hy,
have hy' : ⟪y, y⟫ ≠ 0 := λ h, by rw [inner_self_eq_zero] at h; exact hy h,
set T := ⟪y, x⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫ with hT,
have h₁ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = re ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_re_symm,
have h₂ : im ⟪y, x⟫ = -im ⟪x, y⟫ := inner_im_symm,
have h₃ : ⟪y, x⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ / (⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫) = ⟪y, x⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫,
{ rw [mul_div_assoc],
have : ⟪y, y⟫ / (⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫) = 1 / ⟪y, y⟫ :=
by rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_self hy', one_mul],
rw [this, div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, ←div_eq_mul_inv] },
have h₄ : ⟪y, y⟫ = 𝓚 (re ⟪y, y⟫) := by simp,
have h₅ : re ⟪y, y⟫ > 0,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne inner_self_nonneg _,
intro H,
apply hy',
rw is_R_or_C.ext_iff,
exact ⟨by simp [H],by simp [inner_self_nonneg_im]⟩ },
have h₆ : re ⟪y, y⟫ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt h₅,
have hmain := calc
0 ≤ re ⟪x - T • y, x - T • y⟫
: inner_self_nonneg
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re ⟪T • y, x⟫ - re ⟪x, T • y⟫ + re ⟪T • y, T • y⟫
: by simp [inner_sub_sub_self, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, h₁, h₂]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (T† * ⟪y, x⟫) - re (T * ⟪x, y⟫) + re (T * T† * ⟪y, y⟫)
: by simp [inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, mul_assoc]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫)
: by field_simp [-mul_re, hT, conj_div, h₁, h₃, inner_conj_sym]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫ / ⟪y, y⟫)
: by rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div_comm, ←mul_div_assoc]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫ / 𝓚 (re ⟪y, y⟫))
: by conv_lhs { rw [h₄] }
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw [div_re_of_real]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - abs (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw [inner_mul_conj_re_abs]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫
: by rw is_R_or_C.abs_mul,
have hmain' : abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫ / re ⟪y, y⟫ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ := by linarith,
have := (mul_le_mul_right h₅).mpr hmain',
rwa [div_mul_cancel (abs ⟪x, y⟫ * abs ⟪y, x⟫) h₆] at this }
end
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
lemma real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
begin
have h₁ : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [←inner_conj_sym]; refl,
have h₂ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ F _ _ x y,
dsimp at h₂,
have h₃ := abs_mul_abs_self ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ,
rw [h₁] at h₂,
simpa [h₃] using h₂,
end
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
lemma linear_independent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E}
(hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0) (ho : ∀ i j, i ≠ j → ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : linear_independent 𝕜 v :=
begin
rw linear_independent_iff',
intros s g hg i hi,
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j in s, g j • v j),
{ rw inner_sum,
symmetry,
convert finset.sum_eq_single i _ _,
{ rw inner_smul_right },
{ intros j hj hji,
rw [inner_smul_right, ho i j hji.symm, mul_zero] },
{ exact λ h, false.elim (h hi) } },
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end
end basic_properties
section norm
lemma norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : E) : ∥x∥ = sqrt (re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
begin
have h₁ : ∥x∥^2 = re ⟪x, x⟫ := norm_sq_eq_inner x,
have h₂ := congr_arg sqrt h₁,
simpa using h₂,
end
lemma norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ∥x∥ = sqrt ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
by { have h := @norm_eq_sqrt_inner ℝ F _ _ x, simpa using h }
lemma inner_self_eq_norm_square (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ :=
by rw[norm_eq_sqrt_inner, ←sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
lemma real_inner_self_eq_norm_square (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ :=
by { have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_square ℝ F _ _ x, simpa using h }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_pow_two {x y : E} : ∥x + y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 + 2 * (re ⟪x, y⟫) + ∥y∥^2 :=
begin
repeat {rw [pow_two, ←inner_self_eq_norm_square]},
rw[inner_add_add_self, two_mul],
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, add_monoid_hom.map_add],
rw [←inner_conj_sym, conj_re],
end
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_pow_two_real {x y : F} : ∥x + y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ∥y∥^2 :=
by { have h := @norm_add_pow_two ℝ F _ _, simpa using h }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_mul_self {x y : E} : ∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + 2 * (re ⟪x, y⟫) + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { repeat {rw [← pow_two]}, exact norm_add_pow_two }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_add_mul_self_real {x y : F} : ∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ F _ _, simpa using h }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_pow_two {x y : E} : ∥x - y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 - 2 * (re ⟪x, y⟫) + ∥y∥^2 :=
begin
repeat {rw [pow_two, ←inner_self_eq_norm_square]},
rw[inner_sub_sub_self],
calc
re (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫)
= re ⟪x, x⟫ - re ⟪x, y⟫ - re ⟪y, x⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by simp
... = -re ⟪y, x⟫ - re ⟪x, y⟫ + re ⟪x, x⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by ring
... = -re (⟪x, y⟫†) - re ⟪x, y⟫ + re ⟪x, x⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by rw[inner_conj_sym]
... = -re ⟪x, y⟫ - re ⟪x, y⟫ + re ⟪x, x⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by rw[conj_re]
... = re ⟪x, x⟫ - 2*re ⟪x, y⟫ + re ⟪y, y⟫ : by ring
end
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_pow_two_real {x y : F} : ∥x - y∥^2 = ∥x∥^2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ∥y∥^2 :=
by { have h := @norm_sub_pow_two ℝ F _ _, simpa using h }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_mul_self {x y : E} : ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { repeat {rw [← pow_two]}, exact norm_sub_pow_two }
/-- Expand the square -/
lemma norm_sub_mul_self_real {x y : F} : ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ F _ _, simpa using h }
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
lemma abs_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : abs ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _))
begin
have : ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ * (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = (re ⟪x, x⟫) * (re ⟪y, y⟫),
simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_square], ring,
rw this,
conv_lhs { congr, skip, rw [inner_abs_conj_sym] },
exact inner_mul_inner_self_le _ _
end
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
lemma abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : absR ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
by { have h := @abs_inner_le_norm ℝ F _ _ x y, simpa using h }
include 𝕜
lemma parallelogram_law_with_norm {x y : E} :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ + ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = 2 * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥) :=
begin
simp only [(inner_self_eq_norm_square _).symm],
rw[←add_monoid_hom.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul],
simp only [add_monoid_hom.map_add],
end
omit 𝕜
lemma parallelogram_law_with_norm_real {x y : F} :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ + ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = 2 * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥) :=
by { have h := @parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ F _ _ x y, simpa using h }
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ - ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ - ∥y∥ * ∥y∥) / 2 :=
by rw norm_add_mul_self; ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
lemma real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ - ∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥) / 2 :=
by rw norm_sub_mul_self; ring
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
lemma norm_add_square_eq_norm_square_add_norm_square_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
begin
rw [norm_add_mul_self, add_right_cancel_iff, add_right_eq_self, mul_eq_zero],
norm_num
end
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
lemma norm_add_square_eq_norm_square_add_norm_square_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
begin
rw [norm_add_mul_self, add_right_cancel_iff, add_right_eq_self, mul_eq_zero],
apply or.inr,
simp only [h, zero_re'],
end
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
lemma norm_add_square_eq_norm_square_add_norm_square_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
∥x + y∥ * ∥x + y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
(norm_add_square_eq_norm_square_add_norm_square_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
lemma norm_sub_square_eq_norm_square_add_norm_square_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
begin
rw [norm_sub_mul_self, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_right_eq_self, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero],
norm_num
end
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
lemma norm_sub_square_eq_norm_square_add_norm_square_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
∥x - y∥ * ∥x - y∥ = ∥x∥ * ∥x∥ + ∥y∥ * ∥y∥ :=
(norm_sub_square_eq_norm_square_add_norm_square_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
lemma real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ∥x∥ = ∥y∥ :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw ←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _) },
simp only [←inner_self_eq_norm_square, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right,
real_inner_comm y x, sub_eq_zero, re_to_real],
split,
{ intro h,
rw [add_comm] at h,
linarith },
{ intro h,
linarith }
end
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
lemma abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : absR (⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥)) ≤ 1 :=
begin
rw _root_.abs_div,
by_cases h : 0 = absR (∥x∥ * ∥y∥),
{ rw [←h, div_zero],
norm_num },
{ change 0 ≠ absR (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) at h,
rw div_le_iff' (lt_of_le_of_ne (ge_iff_le.mp (_root_.abs_nonneg (∥x∥ * ∥y∥))) h),
convert abs_real_inner_le_norm x y using 1,
rw [_root_.abs_mul, _root_.abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg x), _root_.abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg y), mul_one] }
end
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
lemma real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥) :=
by rw [real_inner_smul_left, ←real_inner_self_eq_norm_square]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
lemma real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (∥x∥ * ∥x∥) :=
by rw [inner_smul_right, ←real_inner_self_eq_norm_square]
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
lemma abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul
{x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : abs ⟪x, r • x⟫ / (∥x∥ * ∥r • x∥) = 1 :=
begin
have hx' : ∥x∥ ≠ 0 := by simp [norm_eq_zero, hx],
have hr' : abs r ≠ 0 := by simp [is_R_or_C.abs_eq_zero, hr],
rw [inner_smul_right, is_R_or_C.abs_mul, ←inner_self_re_abs, inner_self_eq_norm_square, norm_smul],
rw [is_R_or_C.norm_eq_abs, ←mul_assoc, ←div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_div_cancel _ hx',
←div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel _ hr', div_self hx'],
end
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
lemma abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul
{x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : absR ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥r • x∥) = 1 :=
begin
rw ← abs_to_real,
exact abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
end
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
lemma real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul
{x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥r • x∥) = 1 :=
begin
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, ←mul_assoc ∥x∥, mul_comm _ (absR r),
mul_assoc, _root_.abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hr), div_self],
exact mul_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hr)
(λ h, hx (norm_eq_zero.1 (eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero h)))
end
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
lemma real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul
{x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥r • x∥) = -1 :=
begin
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, ←mul_assoc ∥x∥, mul_comm _ (absR r),
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, ←neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self],
exact mul_ne_zero (ne_of_lt hr)
(λ h, hx (norm_eq_zero.1 (eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero h)))
end
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
lemma abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
abs (⟪x, y⟫ / 𝓚 (∥x∥ * ∥y∥)) = 1 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ (r : 𝕜), r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have hx0 : x ≠ 0,
{ intro hx0,
rw [hx0, inner_zero_left, zero_div] at h,
norm_num at h,
exact h },
refine and.intro hx0 _,
set r := ⟪x, y⟫ / 𝓚 (∥x∥ * ∥x∥) with hr,
use r,
set t := y - r • x with ht,
have ht0 : ⟪x, t⟫ = 0,
{ rw [ht, inner_sub_right, inner_smul_right, hr, ←inner_self_eq_norm_square, inner_self_re_to_K,
div_mul_cancel _ (λ h, hx0 (inner_self_eq_zero.1 h)), sub_self] },
replace h : ∥r • x∥ / ∥t + r • x∥ = 1,
{ rwa [←sub_add_cancel y (r • x), ←ht, inner_add_right, ht0, zero_add, inner_smul_right,
is_R_or_C.abs_div, is_R_or_C.abs_mul, ←inner_self_re_abs,
inner_self_eq_norm_square, of_real_mul, is_R_or_C.abs_mul, abs_of_real, abs_of_real,
abs_norm_eq_norm, abs_norm_eq_norm, ←mul_assoc, mul_comm,
mul_div_mul_left _ _ (λ h, hx0 (norm_eq_zero.1 h)), ←is_R_or_C.norm_eq_abs, ←norm_smul] at h },
have hr0 : r ≠ 0,
{ intro hr0,
rw [hr0, zero_smul, norm_zero, zero_div] at h,
norm_num at h },
refine and.intro hr0 _,
have h2 : ∥r • x∥ ^ 2 = ∥t + r • x∥ ^ 2,
{ rw [eq_of_div_eq_one h] },
replace h2 : ⟪r • x, r • x⟫ = ⟪t, t⟫ + ⟪t, r • x⟫ + ⟪r • x, t⟫ + ⟪r • x, r • x⟫,
{ rw [pow_two, pow_two, ←inner_self_eq_norm_square, ←inner_self_eq_norm_square ] at h2,
have h2' := congr_arg (λ z, 𝓚 z) h2,
simp_rw [inner_self_re_to_K, inner_add_add_self] at h2',
exact h2' },
conv at h2 in ⟪r • x, t⟫ { rw [inner_smul_left, ht0, mul_zero] },
symmetry' at h2,
have h₁ : ⟪t, r • x⟫ = 0 := by { rw [inner_smul_right, ←inner_conj_sym, ht0], simp },
rw [add_zero, h₁, add_left_eq_self, add_zero, inner_self_eq_zero] at h2,
rw h2 at ht,
exact eq_of_sub_eq_zero ht.symm },
{ intro h,
rcases h with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
rw hy,
rw [is_R_or_C.abs_div, abs_of_real, _root_.abs_mul, abs_norm_eq_norm, abs_norm_eq_norm],
exact abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr }
end
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
lemma abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
absR (⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥)) = 1 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ (r : ℝ), r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x) :=
by { simpa using abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff x y, assumption }
/--
If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
-/
lemma abs_inner_eq_norm_iff (x y : E) (hx0 : x ≠ 0) (hy0 : y ≠ 0):
abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ ∃ (r : 𝕜), r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
begin
have hx0' : ∥x∥ ≠ 0 := by simp [norm_eq_zero, hx0],
have hy0' : ∥y∥ ≠ 0 := by simp [norm_eq_zero, hy0],
have hxy0 : ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx0', hy0'],
have h₁ : abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ ↔ abs (⟪x, y⟫ / 𝓚 (∥x∥ * ∥y∥)) = 1,
{ refine ⟨_ ,_⟩,
{ intro h,
rw [is_R_or_C.abs_div, h, abs_of_real, _root_.abs_mul, abs_norm_eq_norm, abs_norm_eq_norm],
exact div_self hxy0 },
{ intro h,
rwa [is_R_or_C.abs_div, abs_of_real, _root_.abs_mul, abs_norm_eq_norm, abs_norm_eq_norm,
div_eq_one_iff_eq hxy0] at h } },
rw [h₁, abs_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff x y],
have : x ≠ 0 := λ h, (hx0' $ norm_eq_zero.mpr h),
simp [this]
end
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
lemma real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = 1 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ y = r • x) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have ha := h,
apply_fun absR at ha,
norm_num at ha,
rcases (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff x y).1 ha with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
use [hx, r],
refine and.intro _ hy,
by_contradiction hrneg,
rw hy at h,
rw real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul hx
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hrneg) hr) at h,
norm_num at h },
{ intro h,
rcases h with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
rw hy,
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr }
end
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
lemma real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (∥x∥ * ∥y∥) = -1 ↔ (x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ (r : ℝ), r < 0 ∧ y = r • x) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have ha := h,
apply_fun absR at ha,
norm_num at ha,
rcases (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff x y).1 ha with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
use [hx, r],
refine and.intro _ hy,
by_contradiction hrpos,
rw hy at h,
rw real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hrpos) hr.symm) at h,
norm_num at h },
{ intro h,
rcases h with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hy⟩⟩⟩,
rw hy,
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul hx hr }
end
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
lemma inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i in s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i in s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪(∑ i₁ in s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁), (∑ i₂ in s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂)⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ in s₁, ∑ i₂ in s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (∥v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂∥ * ∥v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂∥)) / 2 :=
by simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two,
←div_sub_div_same, ←div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib,
finset.sum_sub_distrib, finset.sum_add_distrib, ←finset.mul_sum, ←finset.sum_mul,
h₁, h₂, zero_mul, mul_zero, finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, finset.mul_sum,
neg_div, finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end norm
/-! ### Inner product space structure on product spaces -/
/-
If `ι` is a finite type and each space `f i`, `i : ι`, is an inner product space,
then `Π i, f i` is an inner product space as well. Since `Π i, f i` is endowed with the sup norm,
we use instead `pi_Lp 2 one_le_two f` for the product space, which is endowed with the `L^2` norm.
-/
instance pi_Lp.inner_product_space {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] (f : ι → Type*)
[Π i, inner_product_space 𝕜 (f i)] : inner_product_space 𝕜 (pi_Lp 2 one_le_two f) :=
{ inner := λ x y, ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i),
norm_sq_eq_inner :=
begin
intro x,
have h₁ : ∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ (2 : ℕ) = ∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ (2 : ℝ),
{ apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
intros j hj,
simp [←rpow_nat_cast] },
have h₂ : 0 ≤ ∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ (2 : ℝ),
{ rw [←h₁],
exact finset.sum_nonneg (λ (j : ι) (hj : j ∈ finset.univ), pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg (x j)) 2) },
simp [norm, add_monoid_hom.map_sum, ←norm_sq_eq_inner],
rw [←rpow_nat_cast ((∑ (i : ι), ∥x i∥ ^ (2 : ℝ)) ^ (2 : ℝ)⁻¹) 2],
rw [←rpow_mul h₂],
norm_num [h₁],
end,
conj_sym :=
begin
intros x y,
unfold inner,
rw [←finset.sum_hom finset.univ conj],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
rintros z -,
apply inner_conj_sym,
apply_instance
end,
nonneg_im :=
begin
intro x,
unfold inner,
rw[←finset.sum_hom finset.univ im],
apply finset.sum_eq_zero,
rintros z -,
exact inner_self_nonneg_im,
apply_instance
end,
add_left := λ x y z,
show ∑ i, inner (x i + y i) (z i) = ∑ i, inner (x i) (z i) + ∑ i, inner (y i) (z i),
by simp only [inner_add_left, finset.sum_add_distrib],
smul_left := λ x y r,
show ∑ (i : ι), inner (r • x i) (y i) = (conj r) * ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i),
by simp only [finset.mul_sum, inner_smul_left]
}
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `is_R_or_C` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance is_R_or_C.inner_product_space : inner_product_space 𝕜 𝕜 :=
{ inner := (λ x y, (conj x) * y),
norm_sq_eq_inner := λ x, by unfold inner; rw [mul_comm, mul_conj, of_real_re, norm_sq, norm_sq_eq_def],
conj_sym := λ x y, by simp [mul_comm],
nonneg_im := λ x, by rw[mul_im, conj_re, conj_im]; ring,
add_left := λ x y z, by simp [inner, add_mul],
smul_left := λ x y z, by simp [inner, mul_assoc] }
/-- The standard real/complex Euclidean space, functions on a finite type. For an `n`-dimensional space
use `euclidean_space 𝕜 (fin n)`. -/
@[reducible, nolint unused_arguments]
def euclidean_space (𝕜 : Type*) [is_R_or_C 𝕜]
(n : Type*) [fintype n] : Type* := pi_Lp 2 one_le_two (λ (i : n), 𝕜)
section is_R_or_C_to_real
variables {G : Type*}
variables (𝕜)
include 𝕜
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since it creates problems with the case `𝕜 = ℝ`. -/
def has_inner.is_R_or_C_to_real : has_inner ℝ E :=
{ inner := λ x y, re ⟪x, y⟫ }
lemma real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@has_inner.inner ℝ E (has_inner.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ := rfl
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure. This is not
registered as an instance since it creates problems with the case `𝕜 = ℝ`, but in can be used in a
proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given `𝕜`-inner product space
structure. -/
def inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real : inner_product_space ℝ E :=
{ norm_sq_eq_inner := norm_sq_eq_inner,
conj_sym := λ x y, inner_re_symm,
nonneg_im := λ x, rfl,
add_left := λ x y z, by { change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫, simp [inner_add_left] },
smul_left :=
begin
intros x y r,
change re ⟪(algebra_map ℝ 𝕜 r) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫,
have : algebra_map ℝ 𝕜 r = r • (1 : 𝕜) := by simp [algebra_map, algebra.smul_def'],
simp [this, inner_smul_left, smul_coe_mul_ax],
end,
..has_inner.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜,
..normed_space.restrict_scalars ℝ 𝕜 E }
omit 𝕜
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product -/
instance inner_product_space.complex_to_real [inner_product_space ℂ G] : inner_product_space ℝ G :=
inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real ℂ
end is_R_or_C_to_real
section pi_Lp
local attribute [reducible] pi_Lp
variables {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
instance : finite_dimensional 𝕜 (euclidean_space 𝕜 ι) := by apply_instance
@[simp] lemma findim_euclidean_space :
finite_dimensional.findim 𝕜 (euclidean_space 𝕜 ι) = fintype.card ι := by simp
lemma findim_euclidean_space_fin {n : ℕ} :
finite_dimensional.findim 𝕜 (euclidean_space 𝕜 (fin n)) = n := by simp
end pi_Lp
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
section orthogonal
open filter
/--
Existence of minimizers
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
-/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
theorem exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex {K : set F} (ne : K.nonempty) (h₁ : is_complete K)
(h₂ : convex K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ∥u - v∥ = ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥ := assume u,
begin
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥,
letI : nonempty K := ne.to_subtype,
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_cinfi (λ _, norm_nonneg _),
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥,
from cinfi_le ⟨0, set.forall_range_iff.2 $ λ _, norm_nonneg _⟩,
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥ := assume w hw, δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩,
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `∥u - w n∥ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `∥u - w n∥ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ∥u - w n∥ < δ + 1 / (n + 1),
{ have hδ : ∀n:ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1), from
λ n, lt_add_of_le_of_pos (le_refl _) nat.one_div_pos_of_nat,
have h := λ n, exists_lt_of_cinfi_lt (hδ n),
let w : ℕ → K := λ n, classical.some (h n),
exact ⟨w, λ n, classical.some_spec (h n)⟩ },
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩,
have norm_tendsto : tendsto (λ n, ∥u - w n∥) at_top (nhds δ),
{ have h : tendsto (λ n:ℕ, δ) at_top (nhds δ) := tendsto_const_nhds,
have h' : tendsto (λ n:ℕ, δ + 1 / (n + 1)) at_top (nhds δ),
{ convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat, simp only [add_zero] },
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h'
(λ x, δ_le _) (λ x, le_of_lt (hw _)) },
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : cauchy_seq (λ n, ((w n):F)),
{ rw cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0, -- splits into three goals
let b := λ n:ℕ, (8 * δ * (1/(n+1)) + 4 * (1/(n+1)) * (1/(n+1))),
use (λn, sqrt (b n)),
split,
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ sqrt (b n)`
assume n, exact sqrt_nonneg _,
split,
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ sqrt (b N)`
assume p q N hp hq,
let wp := ((w p):F), let wq := ((w q):F),
let a := u - wq, let b := u - wp,
let half := 1 / (2:ℝ), let div := 1 / ((N:ℝ) + 1),
have : 4 * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ + ∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥ =
2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) :=
calc
4 * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥ + ∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥
= (2*∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) * (2 * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) + ∥wp-wq∥*∥wp-wq∥ : by ring
... = (absR ((2:ℝ)) * ∥u - half•(wq + wp)∥) * (absR ((2:ℝ)) * ∥u - half•(wq+wp)∥) + ∥wp-wq∥*∥wp-wq∥ :
by { rw _root_.abs_of_nonneg, exact add_nonneg zero_le_one zero_le_one }
... = ∥(2:ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))∥ * ∥(2:ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))∥ + ∥wp-wq∥ * ∥wp-wq∥ :
by simp [norm_smul]
... = ∥a + b∥ * ∥a + b∥ + ∥a - b∥ * ∥a - b∥ :
begin
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0),
← one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul],
simp only [one_smul],
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := calc
wp - wq = (u - wq) - (u - wp) : by rw [sub_sub_assoc_swap, add_sub_assoc, sub_add_sub_cancel']
... = a - b : rfl,
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b, show u + u - (wq + wp) = (u - wq) + (u - wp), abel,
rw [eq₁, eq₂],
end
... = 2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) : parallelogram_law_with_norm,
have eq : δ ≤ ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥,
{ rw smul_add,
apply δ_le', apply h₂,
repeat {exact subtype.mem _},
repeat {exact le_of_lt one_half_pos},
exact add_halves 1 },
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq + wp)∥,
{ mono, mono, norm_num, apply mul_nonneg, norm_num, exact norm_nonneg _ },
have eq₂ : ∥a∥ * ∥a∥ ≤ (δ + div) * (δ + div) :=
mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
(le_trans (le_of_lt $ hw q) (add_le_add_left (nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)),
have eq₂' : ∥b∥ * ∥b∥ ≤ (δ + div) * (δ + div) :=
mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
(le_trans (le_of_lt $ hw p) (add_le_add_left (nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)),
rw dist_eq_norm,
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le, { exact sqrt_nonneg _ },
rw mul_self_sqrt,
exact calc
∥wp - wq∥ * ∥wp - wq∥ = 2 * (∥a∥*∥a∥ + ∥b∥*∥b∥) - 4 * ∥u - half • (wq+wp)∥ * ∥u - half • (wq+wp)∥ :
by { rw ← this, simp }
... ≤ 2 * (∥a∥ * ∥a∥ + ∥b∥ * ∥b∥) - 4 * δ * δ : sub_le_sub_left eq₁ _
... ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ :
sub_le_sub_right (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (add_le_add eq₂ eq₂') (by norm_num)) _
... = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div : by ring,
exact add_nonneg (mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) zero_le_δ) (le_of_lt nat.one_div_pos_of_nat))
(mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) (le_of_lt nat.one_div_pos_of_nat)) (le_of_lt nat.one_div_pos_of_nat)),
-- third goal : `tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), sqrt (b n)) at_top (𝓝 0)`
apply tendsto.comp,
{ convert continuous_sqrt.continuous_at, exact sqrt_zero.symm },
have eq₁ : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (nhds (0:ℝ)),
{ convert (@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ (8 * δ) _).mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), (4:ℝ) * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (nhds (0:ℝ)),
{ convert (@tendsto_const_nhds _ _ _ (4:ℝ) _).mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
have eq₂ : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), (4:ℝ) * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))) at_top (nhds (0:ℝ)),
{ convert this.mul tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat,
simp only [mul_zero] },
convert eq₁.add eq₂, simp only [add_zero] },
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_is_complete h₁ (λ n, _) seq_is_cauchy with ⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩,
use v, use hv,
have h_cont : continuous (λ v, ∥u - v∥) :=
continuous.comp continuous_norm (continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id),
have : tendsto (λ n, ∥u - w n∥) at_top (nhds ∥u - v∥),
convert (tendsto.comp h_cont.continuous_at w_tendsto),
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto,
exact subtype.mem _
end
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : set F} (h : convex K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : ∥u - v∥ = (⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 :=
iff.intro
begin
assume eq w hw,
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ∥u - w∥, let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ, let q := ∥w - v∥^2,
letI : nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩,
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ,
apply le_cinfi, intro, exact norm_nonneg _,
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥,
assume w, apply cinfi_le, use (0:ℝ), rintros _ ⟨_, rfl⟩, exact norm_nonneg _,
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ∥u - w∥ := assume w hw, δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩,
have : ∀θ:ℝ, 0 < θ → θ ≤ 1 → 2 * p ≤ θ * q,
assume θ hθ₁ hθ₂,
have : ∥u - v∥^2 ≤ ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ*θ*∥w - v∥^2 :=
calc
∥u - v∥^2 ≤ ∥u - (θ•w + (1-θ)•v)∥^2 :
begin
simp only [pow_two], apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _),
rw [eq], apply δ_le',
apply h hw hv,
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel'_right _ _],
end
... = ∥(u - v) - θ • (w - v)∥^2 :
begin
have : u - (θ•w + (1-θ)•v) = (u - v) - θ • (w - v),
{ rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul],
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev] },
rw this
end
... = ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ*θ*∥w - v∥^2 :
begin
rw [norm_sub_pow_two, inner_smul_right, norm_smul],
simp only [pow_two],
show ∥u-v∥*∥u-v∥-2*(θ*inner(u-v)(w-v))+absR (θ)*∥w-v∥*(absR (θ)*∥w-v∥)=
∥u-v∥*∥u-v∥-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)+θ*θ*(∥w-v∥*∥w-v∥),
rw abs_of_pos hθ₁, ring
end,
have eq₁ : ∥u-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)+θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2=∥u-v∥^2+(θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)), abel,
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this,
have eq₂ : θ*θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*θ*inner(u-v)(w-v)=θ*(θ*∥w-v∥^2-2*inner(u-v)(w-v)), ring,
rw eq₂ at this,
have := le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left this hθ₁),
exact this,
by_cases hq : q = 0,
{ rw hq at this,
have : p ≤ 0,
have := this (1:ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num),
linarith,
exact this },
{ have q_pos : 0 < q,
apply lt_of_le_of_ne, exact pow_two_nonneg _, intro h, exact hq h.symm,
by_contradiction hp, rw not_le at hp,
let θ := min (1:ℝ) (p / q),
have eq₁ : θ*q ≤ p := calc
θ*q ≤ (p/q) * q : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (pow_two_nonneg _)
... = p : div_mul_cancel _ hq,
have : 2 * p ≤ p := calc
2 * p ≤ θ*q : by { refine this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num) }
... ≤ p : eq₁,
linarith }
end
begin
assume h,
letI : nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩,
apply le_antisymm,
{ apply le_cinfi, assume w,
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_squares_le (norm_nonneg _),
have := h w w.2,
exact calc
∥u - v∥ * ∥u - v∥ ≤ ∥u - v∥ * ∥u - v∥ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w:F) - v) : by linarith
... ≤ ∥u - v∥^2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w:F) - v) + ∥(w:F) - v∥^2 :
by { rw pow_two, refine le_add_of_nonneg_right _, exact pow_two_nonneg _ }
... = ∥(u - v) - (w - v)∥^2 : norm_sub_pow_two.symm
... = ∥u - w∥ * ∥u - w∥ :
by { have : (u - v) - (w - v) = u - w, abel, rw [this, pow_two] } },
{ show (⨅ (w : K), ∥u - w∥) ≤ (λw:K, ∥u - w∥) ⟨v, hv⟩,
apply cinfi_le, use 0, rintros y ⟨z, rfl⟩, exact norm_nonneg _ }
end
/--
Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace (K : subspace 𝕜 E)
(h : is_complete (↑K : set E)) : ∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ∥u - v∥ = ⨅ w : (K : set E), ∥u - w∥ :=
begin
letI : inner_product_space ℝ E := inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜,
letI : module ℝ E := restrict_scalars.semimodule ℝ 𝕜 E,
letI : is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E := restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower _ _ _,
let K' : subspace ℝ E := submodule.restrict_scalars ℝ K,
exact exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
end
/--
Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superceded by `norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `is_R_or_C` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : subspace ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : ∥u - v∥ = (⨅ w : (↑K : set F), ∥u - w∥) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
iff.intro
begin
assume h,
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0,
{ rwa [norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h, exacts [K.convex, hv] },
assume w hw,
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0,
let w' := w + v,
have : w' ∈ K := submodule.add_mem _ hw hv,
have h₁ := h w' this,
have h₂ : w' - v = w, simp only [add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg],
rw h₂ at h₁, exact h₁,
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0,
let w'' := -w + v,
have : w'' ∈ K := submodule.add_mem _ (submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv,
have h₁ := h w'' this,
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w, simp only [neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg],
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁,
linarith,
exact le_antisymm le ge
end
begin
assume h,
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0,
assume w hw,
let w' := w - v,
have : w' ∈ K := submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv,
have h₁ := h w' this,
exact le_of_eq h₁,
rwa norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero,
exacts [submodule.convex _, hv]
end
/--
Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `∥u - v∥` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero (K : subspace 𝕜 E) {u : E} {v : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) : ∥u - v∥ = (⨅ w : (↑K : set E), ∥u - w∥) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 :=
begin
letI : inner_product_space ℝ E := inner_product_space.is_R_or_C_to_real 𝕜,
letI : module ℝ E := restrict_scalars.semimodule ℝ 𝕜 E,
letI : is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 E := restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower _ _ _,
let K' : subspace ℝ E := K.restrict_scalars ℝ,
split,
{ assume H,
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).1 H,
assume w hw,
apply ext,
{ simp [A w hw] },
{ symmetry, calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 : im.map_zero
... = re ⟪u - v, (-I) • w⟫ : (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
... = re ((-I) * ⟪u - v, w⟫) : by rw inner_smul_right
... = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ : by simp } },
{ assume H,
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0,
{ assume w hw,
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw],
exact zero_re' },
exact (norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).2 this }
end
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonal_projection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonal_projection_fn {K : subspace 𝕜 E} (h : is_complete (K : set E)) (v : E) :=
(exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace K h v).some
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_mem {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : is_complete (K : set E)) (v : E) :
orthogonal_projection_fn h v ∈ K :=
(exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace K h v).some_spec.some
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : is_complete (K : set E))
(v : E) : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonal_projection_fn h v, w⟫ = 0 :=
begin
rw ←norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero K (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem h v),
exact (exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace K h v).some_spec.some_spec
end
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
lemma eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {K : submodule 𝕜 E}
(h : is_complete (K : set E)) {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K) (hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) :
v = orthogonal_projection_fn h u :=
begin
rw [←sub_eq_zero, ←inner_self_eq_zero],
have hvs : v - orthogonal_projection_fn h u ∈ K :=
submodule.sub_mem K hvm (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem h u),
have huo : ⟪u - orthogonal_projection_fn h u, v - orthogonal_projection_fn h u⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero h u _ hvs,
have huv : ⟪u - v, v - orthogonal_projection_fn h u⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs,
have houv : ⟪(u - orthogonal_projection_fn h u) - (u - v), v - orthogonal_projection_fn h u⟫ = 0,
{ rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero] },
rwa sub_sub_sub_cancel_left at houv
end
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. For most
purposes, `orthogonal_projection`, which removes the `is_complete`
hypothesis and is the identity map when the subspace is not complete,
should be used instead. -/
def orthogonal_projection_of_complete {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : is_complete (K : set E)) :
linear_map 𝕜 E E :=
{ to_fun := orthogonal_projection_fn h,
map_add' := λ x y, begin
have hm : orthogonal_projection_fn h x + orthogonal_projection_fn h y ∈ K :=
submodule.add_mem K (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem h x) (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem h y),
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (orthogonal_projection_fn h x + orthogonal_projection_fn h y), w⟫ = 0,
{ intros w hw,
rw [add_sub_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero h _ w hw,
orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero h _ w hw, add_zero] },
rw eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h hm ho
end,
map_smul' := λ c x, begin
have hm : c • orthogonal_projection_fn h x ∈ K :=
submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonal_projection_fn_mem h x),
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • orthogonal_projection_fn h x, w⟫ = 0,
{ intros w hw,
rw [←smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero h _ w hw, mul_zero] },
rw eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h hm ho
end }
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a subspace, which is expected to be
complete. If the subspace is not complete, this uses the identity map
instead. -/
def orthogonal_projection (K : submodule 𝕜 E) : linear_map 𝕜 E E :=
if h : is_complete (K : set E) then orthogonal_projection_of_complete h else linear_map.id
/-- The definition of `orthogonal_projection` using `if`. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_def (K : submodule 𝕜 E) :
orthogonal_projection K =
if h : is_complete (K : set E) then orthogonal_projection_of_complete h else linear_map.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orthogonal_projection_fn_eq {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : is_complete (K : set E)) (v : E) :
orthogonal_projection_fn h v = orthogonal_projection K v :=
by { rw [orthogonal_projection_def, dif_pos h], refl }
/-- The orthogonal projection is in the given subspace. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_mem {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : is_complete (K : set E)) (v : E) :
orthogonal_projection K v ∈ K :=
begin
rw ←orthogonal_projection_fn_eq h,
exact orthogonal_projection_fn_mem h v
end
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
lemma orthogonal_projection_inner_eq_zero (K : submodule 𝕜 E) (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonal_projection K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
begin
simp_rw orthogonal_projection_def,
split_ifs,
{ exact orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero h v },
{ simp },
end
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
lemma eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {K : submodule 𝕜 E}
(h : is_complete (K : set E)) {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K) (hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) :
v = orthogonal_projection K u :=
begin
rw ←orthogonal_projection_fn_eq h,
exact eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h hvm hvo
end
/-- The subspace of vectors orthogonal to a given subspace. -/
def submodule.orthogonal (K : submodule 𝕜 E) : submodule 𝕜 E :=
{ carrier := {v | ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪u, v⟫ = 0},
zero_mem' := λ _ _, inner_zero_right,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy u hu, by rw [inner_add_right, hx u hu, hy u hu, add_zero],
smul_mem' := λ c x hx u hu, by rw [inner_smul_right, hx u hu, mul_zero] }
/-- When a vector is in `K.orthogonal`. -/
lemma submodule.mem_orthogonal (K : submodule 𝕜 E) (v : E) :
v ∈ K.orthogonal ↔ ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 :=
iff.rfl
/-- When a vector is in `K.orthogonal`, with the inner product the
other way round. -/
lemma submodule.mem_orthogonal' (K : submodule 𝕜 E) (v : E) :
v ∈ K.orthogonal ↔ ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 :=
by simp_rw [submodule.mem_orthogonal, inner_eq_zero_sym]
/-- A vector in `K` is orthogonal to one in `K.orthogonal`. -/
lemma submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (hu : u ∈ K)
(hv : v ∈ K.orthogonal) : ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal v).1 hv u hu
/-- A vector in `K.orthogonal` is orthogonal to one in `K`. -/
lemma submodule.inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (hu : u ∈ K)
(hv : v ∈ K.orthogonal) : ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 :=
by rw [inner_eq_zero_sym]; exact submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal hu hv
/-- `K` and `K.orthogonal` have trivial intersection. -/
lemma submodule.orthogonal_disjoint (K : submodule 𝕜 E) : disjoint K K.orthogonal :=
begin
simp_rw [submodule.disjoint_def, submodule.mem_orthogonal],
exact λ x hx ho, inner_self_eq_zero.1 (ho x hx)
end
variables (𝕜 E)
/-- `submodule.orthogonal` gives a `galois_connection` between
`submodule 𝕜 E` and its `order_dual`. -/
lemma submodule.orthogonal_gc :
@galois_connection (submodule 𝕜 E) (order_dual $ submodule 𝕜 E) _ _
submodule.orthogonal submodule.orthogonal :=
λ K₁ K₂, ⟨λ h v hv u hu, submodule.inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal hv (h hu),
λ h v hv u hu, submodule.inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal hv (h hu)⟩
variables {𝕜 E}
/-- `submodule.orthogonal` reverses the `≤` ordering of two
subspaces. -/
lemma submodule.orthogonal_le {K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) :
K₂.orthogonal ≤ K₁.orthogonal :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).monotone_l h
/-- `K` is contained in `K.orthogonal.orthogonal`. -/
lemma submodule.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (K : submodule 𝕜 E) : K ≤ K.orthogonal.orthogonal :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).le_u_l _
/-- The inf of two orthogonal subspaces equals the subspace orthogonal
to the sup. -/
lemma submodule.inf_orthogonal (K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E) :
K₁.orthogonal ⊓ K₂.orthogonal = (K₁ ⊔ K₂).orthogonal :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).l_sup.symm
/-- The inf of an indexed family of orthogonal subspaces equals the
subspace orthogonal to the sup. -/
lemma submodule.infi_orthogonal {ι : Type*} (K : ι → submodule 𝕜 E) :
(⨅ i, (K i).orthogonal) = (supr K).orthogonal :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).l_supr.symm
/-- The inf of a set of orthogonal subspaces equals the subspace
orthogonal to the sup. -/
lemma submodule.Inf_orthogonal (s : set $ submodule 𝕜 E) :
(⨅ K ∈ s, submodule.orthogonal K) = (Sup s).orthogonal :=
(submodule.orthogonal_gc 𝕜 E).l_Sup.symm
/-- If `K₁` is complete and contained in `K₂`, `K₁` and `K₁.orthogonal ⊓ K₂` span `K₂`. -/
lemma submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_is_complete {K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂)
(hc : is_complete (K₁ : set E)) : K₁ ⊔ (K₁.orthogonal ⊓ K₂) = K₂ :=
begin
ext x,
rw submodule.mem_sup,
rcases exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace K₁ hc x with ⟨v, hv, hvm⟩,
rw norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero K₁ hv at hvm,
split,
{ rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩,
exact K₂.add_mem (h hy) hz.2 },
{ exact λ hx, ⟨v, hv, x - v, ⟨(K₁.mem_orthogonal' _).2 hvm, K₂.sub_mem hx (h hv)⟩,
add_sub_cancel'_right _ _⟩ }
end
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `K.orthogonal` span the whole
space. -/
lemma submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_is_complete {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (h : is_complete (K : set E)) :
K ⊔ K.orthogonal = ⊤ :=
begin
convert submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_is_complete (le_top : K ≤ ⊤) h,
simp
end
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `K.orthogonal` are complements of each
other. -/
lemma submodule.is_compl_orthogonal_of_is_complete {K : submodule 𝕜 E}
(h : is_complete (K : set E)) : is_compl K K.orthogonal :=
⟨K.orthogonal_disjoint, le_of_eq (submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_is_complete h).symm⟩
@[simp] lemma submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot : (⊤ : submodule 𝕜 E).orthogonal = ⊥ :=
begin
ext,
rw [submodule.mem_bot, submodule.mem_orthogonal],
exact ⟨λ h, inner_self_eq_zero.mp (h x submodule.mem_top), by { rintro rfl, simp }⟩
end
@[simp] lemma submodule.bot_orthogonal_eq_top : (⊥ : submodule 𝕜 E).orthogonal = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot, eq_top_iff],
exact submodule.le_orthogonal_orthogonal ⊤
end
lemma submodule.eq_top_iff_orthogonal_eq_bot {K : submodule 𝕜 E} (hK : is_complete (K : set E)) :
K = ⊤ ↔ K.orthogonal = ⊥ :=
begin
refine ⟨by { rintro rfl, exact submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot }, _⟩,
intro h,
have : K ⊔ K.orthogonal = ⊤ := submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_is_complete hK,
rwa [h, sup_comm, bot_sup_eq] at this,
end
open finite_dimensional
/-- Given a finite-dimensional subspace `K₂`, and a subspace `K₁`
containined in it, the dimensions of `K₁` and the intersection of its
orthogonal subspace with `K₂` add to that of `K₂`. -/
lemma submodule.findim_add_inf_findim_orthogonal {K₁ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E}
[finite_dimensional 𝕜 K₂] (h : K₁ ≤ K₂) :
findim 𝕜 K₁ + findim 𝕜 (K₁.orthogonal ⊓ K₂ : submodule 𝕜 E) = findim 𝕜 K₂ :=
begin
haveI := submodule.finite_dimensional_of_le h,
have hd := submodule.dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq K₁ (K₁.orthogonal ⊓ K₂),
rw [←inf_assoc, (submodule.orthogonal_disjoint K₁).eq_bot, bot_inf_eq, findim_bot,
submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_is_complete h
(submodule.complete_of_finite_dimensional _)] at hd,
rw add_zero at hd,
exact hd.symm
end
end orthogonal
|
d0f67916a0a9636d891cff6ab647fb531fdbe6df | 88fb7558b0636ec6b181f2a548ac11ad3919f8a5 | /library/init/logic.lean | 7f6d2d86643cd3edcfe2960fd7ae60095a4ee838 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | moritayasuaki/lean | 9f666c323cb6fa1f31ac597d777914aed41e3b7a | ae96ebf6ee953088c235ff7ae0e8c95066ba8001 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,135,440,814 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 90,269,903 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,493,906,291,000 | 1,493,906,291,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,953 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Floris van Doorn
-/
prelude
import init.core
universes u v w
@[inline] def id {α : Sort u} (a : α) : α := a
def flip {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {φ : Sort w} (f : α → β → φ) : β → α → φ :=
λ b a, f a b
/- implication -/
def implies (a b : Prop) := a → b
@[trans] lemma implies.trans {p q r : Prop} (h₁ : implies p q) (h₂ : implies q r) : implies p r :=
assume hp, h₂ (h₁ hp)
def trivial : true := ⟨⟩
@[inline] def absurd {a : Prop} {b : Sort v} (h₁ : a) (h₂ : ¬a) : b :=
false.rec b (h₂ h₁)
lemma not.intro {a : Prop} (h : a → false) : ¬ a :=
h
lemma mt {a b : Prop} (h₁ : a → b) (h₂ : ¬b) : ¬a :=
assume ha : a, absurd (h₁ ha) h₂
def implies.resolve {a b : Prop} (h : a → b) (nb : ¬ b) : ¬ a := assume ha, nb (h ha)
/- not -/
lemma not_false : ¬false :=
assume h : false, h
def non_contradictory (a : Prop) : Prop := ¬¬a
lemma non_contradictory_intro {a : Prop} (ha : a) : ¬¬a :=
assume hna : ¬a, absurd ha hna
/- false -/
lemma false.elim {c : Prop} (h : false) : c :=
false.rec c h
/- eq -/
-- proof irrelevance is built in
lemma proof_irrel {a : Prop} (h₁ h₂ : a) : h₁ = h₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma id.def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
@[inline] def eq.mp {α β : Sort u} : (α = β) → α → β :=
eq.rec_on
@[inline] def eq.mpr {α β : Sort u} : (α = β) → β → α :=
λ h₁ h₂, eq.rec_on (eq.symm h₁) h₂
lemma eq.substr {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {a b : α} (h₁ : b = a) : p a → p b :=
eq.subst (eq.symm h₁)
lemma congr {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : a₁ = a₂) : f₁ a₁ = f₂ a₂ :=
eq.subst h₁ (eq.subst h₂ rfl)
lemma congr_fun {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {f g : Π x, β x} (h : f = g) (a : α) : f a = g a :=
eq.subst h (eq.refl (f a))
lemma congr_arg {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {a₁ a₂ : α} (f : α → β) : a₁ = a₂ → f a₁ = f a₂ :=
congr rfl
lemma trans_rel_left {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (r : α → α → Prop) (h₁ : r a b) (h₂ : b = c) : r a c :=
h₂ ▸ h₁
lemma trans_rel_right {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (r : α → α → Prop) (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : r b c) : r a c :=
h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma of_eq_true {p : Prop} (h : p = true) : p :=
h.symm ▸ trivial
lemma not_of_eq_false {p : Prop} (h : p = false) : ¬p :=
assume hp, h ▸ hp
@[inline] def cast {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (a : α) : β :=
eq.rec a h
lemma cast_proof_irrel {α β : Sort u} (h₁ h₂ : α = β) (a : α) : cast h₁ a = cast h₂ a :=
rfl
lemma cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a :=
rfl
/- ne -/
@[reducible] def ne {α : Sort u} (a b : α) := ¬(a = b)
notation a ≠ b := ne a b
@[simp] lemma ne.def {α : Sort u} (a b : α) : a ≠ b = ¬ (a = b) :=
rfl
namespace ne
variable {α : Sort u}
variables {a b : α}
lemma intro (h : a = b → false) : a ≠ b := h
lemma elim (h : a ≠ b) : a = b → false := h
lemma irrefl (h : a ≠ a) : false := h rfl
lemma symm (h : a ≠ b) : b ≠ a :=
assume (h₁ : b = a), h (h₁.symm)
end ne
lemma false_of_ne {α : Sort u} {a : α} : a ≠ a → false := ne.irrefl
section
variables {p : Prop}
lemma ne_false_of_self : p → p ≠ false :=
assume (hp : p) (heq : p = false), heq ▸ hp
lemma ne_true_of_not : ¬p → p ≠ true :=
assume (hnp : ¬p) (heq : p = true), (heq ▸ hnp) trivial
lemma true_ne_false : ¬true = false :=
ne_false_of_self trivial
end
attribute [refl] heq.refl
section
variables {α β φ : Sort u} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : φ}
lemma heq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α → Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : a == b)
: p a → p b := eq.rec_on (eq_of_heq h₁)
lemma heq.subst {p : ∀ T : Sort u, T → Prop} : a == b → p α a → p β b :=
heq.rec_on
@[symm] lemma heq.symm (h : a == b) : b == a :=
heq.rec_on h (heq.refl a)
lemma heq_of_eq (h : a = a') : a == a' :=
eq.subst h (heq.refl a)
@[trans] lemma heq.trans (h₁ : a == b) (h₂ : b == c) : a == c :=
heq.subst h₂ h₁
@[trans] lemma heq_of_heq_of_eq (h₁ : a == b) (h₂ : b = b') : a == b' :=
heq.trans h₁ (heq_of_eq h₂)
@[trans] lemma heq_of_eq_of_heq (h₁ : a = a') (h₂ : a' == b) : a == b :=
heq.trans (heq_of_eq h₁) h₂
def type_eq_of_heq (h : a == b) : α = β :=
heq.rec_on h (eq.refl α)
end
lemma eq_rec_heq {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} (h : a = a') (p : φ a), (eq.rec_on h p : φ a') == p
| a ._ rfl p := heq.refl p
lemma heq_of_eq_rec_left {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} {p₁ : φ a} {p₂ : φ a'} (e : a = a') (h₂ : (eq.rec_on e p₁ : φ a') = p₂), p₁ == p₂
| a ._ p₁ p₂ (eq.refl ._) h := eq.rec_on h (heq.refl p₁)
lemma heq_of_eq_rec_right {α : Sort u} {φ : α → Sort v} : ∀ {a a' : α} {p₁ : φ a} {p₂ : φ a'} (e : a' = a) (h₂ : p₁ = eq.rec_on e p₂), p₁ == p₂
| a ._ p₁ p₂ (eq.refl ._) h :=
have p₁ = p₂, from h,
this ▸ heq.refl p₁
lemma of_heq_true {a : Prop} (h : a == true) : a :=
of_eq_true (eq_of_heq h)
lemma eq_rec_compose : ∀ {α β φ : Sort u} (p₁ : β = φ) (p₂ : α = β) (a : α), (eq.rec_on p₁ (eq.rec_on p₂ a : β) : φ) = eq.rec_on (eq.trans p₂ p₁) a
| α ._ ._ (eq.refl ._) (eq.refl ._) a := rfl
lemma eq_rec_eq_eq_rec : ∀ {α₁ α₂ : Sort u} {p : α₁ = α₂} {a₁ : α₁} {a₂ : α₂}, (eq.rec_on p a₁ : α₂) = a₂ → a₁ = eq.rec_on (eq.symm p) a₂
| α ._ rfl a ._ rfl := rfl
lemma eq_rec_of_heq_left : ∀ {α₁ α₂ : Sort u} {a₁ : α₁} {a₂ : α₂} (h : a₁ == a₂), (eq.rec_on (type_eq_of_heq h) a₁ : α₂) = a₂
| α ._ a ._ (heq.refl ._) := rfl
lemma eq_rec_of_heq_right {α₁ α₂ : Sort u} {a₁ : α₁} {a₂ : α₂} (h : a₁ == a₂) : a₁ = eq.rec_on (eq.symm (type_eq_of_heq h)) a₂ :=
eq_rec_eq_eq_rec (eq_rec_of_heq_left h)
lemma cast_heq : ∀ {α β : Sort u} (h : α = β) (a : α), cast h a == a
| α ._ (eq.refl ._) a := heq.refl a
/- and -/
notation a /\ b := and a b
notation a ∧ b := and a b
variables {a b c d : Prop}
lemma and.elim (h₁ : a ∧ b) (h₂ : a → b → c) : c :=
and.rec h₂ h₁
lemma and.swap : a ∧ b → b ∧ a :=
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨hb, ha⟩
def and.symm := @and.swap
/- or -/
notation a \/ b := or a b
notation a ∨ b := or a b
namespace or
lemma elim (h₁ : a ∨ b) (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → c) : c :=
or.rec h₂ h₃ h₁
end or
lemma non_contradictory_em (a : Prop) : ¬¬(a ∨ ¬a) :=
assume not_em : ¬(a ∨ ¬a),
have neg_a : ¬a, from
assume pos_a : a, absurd (or.inl pos_a) not_em,
absurd (or.inr neg_a) not_em
def not_not_em := non_contradictory_em
lemma or.swap : a ∨ b → b ∨ a := or.rec or.inr or.inl
def or.symm := @or.swap
/- xor -/
def xor (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬ b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬ a)
/- iff -/
structure iff (a b : Prop) : Prop :=
intro :: (mp : a → b) (mpr : b → a)
notation a <-> b := iff a b
notation a ↔ b := iff a b
lemma iff.elim : ((a → b) → (b → a) → c) → (a ↔ b) → c := iff.rec
attribute [recursor 5] iff.elim
lemma iff.elim_left : (a ↔ b) → a → b := iff.mp
lemma iff.elim_right : (a ↔ b) → b → a := iff.mpr
lemma iff_iff_implies_and_implies (a b : Prop) : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (b → a) :=
iff.intro (λ h, and.intro h.mp h.mpr) (λ h, iff.intro h.left h.right)
attribute [refl]
lemma iff.refl (a : Prop) : a ↔ a :=
iff.intro (assume h, h) (assume h, h)
lemma iff.rfl {a : Prop} : a ↔ a :=
iff.refl a
attribute [trans]
lemma iff.trans (h₁ : a ↔ b) (h₂ : b ↔ c) : a ↔ c :=
iff.intro
(assume ha, iff.mp h₂ (iff.mp h₁ ha))
(assume hc, iff.mpr h₁ (iff.mpr h₂ hc))
attribute [symm]
lemma iff.symm (h : a ↔ b) : b ↔ a :=
iff.intro (iff.elim_right h) (iff.elim_left h)
lemma iff.comm : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b ↔ a) :=
iff.intro iff.symm iff.symm
lemma eq.to_iff {a b : Prop} (h : a = b) : a ↔ b :=
eq.rec_on h iff.rfl
lemma neq_of_not_iff {a b : Prop} : ¬(a ↔ b) → a ≠ b :=
λ h₁ h₂,
have a ↔ b, from eq.subst h₂ (iff.refl a),
absurd this h₁
lemma not_iff_not_of_iff (h₁ : a ↔ b) : ¬a ↔ ¬b :=
iff.intro
(assume (hna : ¬ a) (hb : b), hna (iff.elim_right h₁ hb))
(assume (hnb : ¬ b) (ha : a), hnb (iff.elim_left h₁ ha))
lemma of_iff_true (h : a ↔ true) : a :=
iff.mp (iff.symm h) trivial
lemma not_of_iff_false : (a ↔ false) → ¬a := iff.mp
lemma iff_true_intro (h : a) : a ↔ true :=
iff.intro
(λ hl, trivial)
(λ hr, h)
lemma iff_false_intro (h : ¬a) : a ↔ false :=
iff.intro h (false.rec a)
lemma not_non_contradictory_iff_absurd (a : Prop) : ¬¬¬a ↔ ¬a :=
iff.intro
(λ (hl : ¬¬¬a) (ha : a), hl (non_contradictory_intro ha))
absurd
def not_not_not_iff := not_non_contradictory_iff_absurd
lemma imp_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a → b) ↔ (c → d) :=
iff.intro
(λ hab hc, iff.mp h₂ (hab (iff.mpr h₁ hc)))
(λ hcd ha, iff.mpr h₂ (hcd (iff.mp h₁ ha)))
lemma imp_congr_ctx (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : c → (b ↔ d)) : (a → b) ↔ (c → d) :=
iff.intro
(λ hab hc, have ha : a, from iff.mpr h₁ hc,
have hb : b, from hab ha,
iff.mp (h₂ hc) hb)
(λ hcd ha, have hc : c, from iff.mp h₁ ha,
have hd : d, from hcd hc,
iff.mpr (h₂ hc) hd)
lemma imp_congr_right (h : a → (b ↔ c)) : (a → b) ↔ (a → c) :=
iff.intro
(take hab ha, iff.elim_left (h ha) (hab ha))
(take hab ha, iff.elim_right (h ha) (hab ha))
lemma not_not_intro (ha : a) : ¬¬a :=
assume hna : ¬a, hna ha
lemma not_of_not_not_not (h : ¬¬¬a) : ¬a :=
λ ha, absurd (not_not_intro ha) h
@[simp] lemma not_true : (¬ true) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (not_not_intro trivial)
def not_true_iff := not_true
@[simp] lemma not_false_iff : (¬ false) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro not_false
@[congr] lemma not_congr (h : a ↔ b) : ¬a ↔ ¬b :=
iff.intro (λ h₁ h₂, h₁ (iff.mpr h h₂)) (λ h₁ h₂, h₁ (iff.mp h h₂))
@[simp] lemma ne_self_iff_false {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (not (a = a)) ↔ false :=
iff.intro false_of_ne false.elim
@[simp] lemma eq_self_iff_true {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (a = a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro rfl
@[simp] lemma heq_self_iff_true {α : Sort u} (a : α) : (a == a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (heq.refl a)
@[simp] lemma iff_not_self (a : Prop) : (a ↔ ¬a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h,
have h' : ¬a, from (λ ha, (iff.mp h ha) ha),
h' (iff.mpr h h'))
@[simp] lemma not_iff_self (a : Prop) : (¬a ↔ a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h,
have h' : ¬a, from (λ ha, (iff.mpr h ha) ha),
h' (iff.mp h h'))
@[simp] lemma true_iff_false : (true ↔ false) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, iff.mp h trivial)
@[simp] lemma false_iff_true : (false ↔ true) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, iff.mpr h trivial)
lemma false_of_true_iff_false : (true ↔ false) → false :=
assume h, iff.mp h trivial
lemma false_of_true_eq_false : (true = false) → false :=
assume h, h ▸ trivial
lemma true_eq_false_of_false : false → (true = false) :=
false.elim
lemma eq_comm {α : Sort u} {a b : α} : a = b ↔ b = a :=
⟨eq.symm, eq.symm⟩
/- and simp rules -/
lemma and.imp (hac : a → c) (hbd : b → d) : a ∧ b → c ∧ d :=
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨hac ha, hbd hb⟩
def and_implies := @and.imp
@[congr] lemma and_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ∧ b) ↔ (c ∧ d) :=
iff.intro (and.imp (iff.mp h₁) (iff.mp h₂)) (and.imp (iff.mpr h₁) (iff.mpr h₂))
lemma and_congr_right (h : a → (b ↔ c)) : (a ∧ b) ↔ (a ∧ c) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨ha, iff.elim_left (h ha) hb⟩)
(assume ⟨ha, hc⟩, ⟨ha, iff.elim_right (h ha) hc⟩)
@[simp] lemma and.comm : a ∧ b ↔ b ∧ a :=
iff.intro and.swap and.swap
lemma and_comm (a b : Prop) : a ∧ b ↔ b ∧ a := and.comm
@[simp] lemma and.assoc : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ a ∧ (b ∧ c) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨⟨ha, hb⟩, hc⟩, ⟨ha, ⟨hb, hc⟩⟩)
(assume ⟨ha, ⟨hb, hc⟩⟩, ⟨⟨ha, hb⟩, hc⟩)
lemma and_assoc (a b : Prop) : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ a ∧ (b ∧ c) := and.assoc
@[simp] lemma and.left_comm : a ∧ (b ∧ c) ↔ b ∧ (a ∧ c) :=
iff.trans (iff.symm and.assoc) (iff.trans (and_congr and.comm (iff.refl c)) and.assoc)
lemma and_iff_left {a b : Prop} (hb : b) : (a ∧ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (λ ha, ⟨ha, hb⟩)
lemma and_iff_right {a b : Prop} (ha : a) : (a ∧ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro and.right (and.intro ha)
@[simp] lemma and_true (a : Prop) : a ∧ true ↔ a :=
and_iff_left trivial
@[simp] lemma true_and (a : Prop) : true ∧ a ↔ a :=
and_iff_right trivial
@[simp] lemma and_false (a : Prop) : a ∧ false ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro and.right
@[simp] lemma false_and (a : Prop) : false ∧ a ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro and.left
@[simp] lemma not_and_self (a : Prop) : (¬a ∧ a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (λ h, and.elim h (λ h₁ h₂, absurd h₂ h₁))
@[simp] lemma and_not_self (a : Prop) : (a ∧ ¬a) ↔ false :=
iff_false_intro (assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, absurd h₁ h₂)
@[simp] lemma and_self (a : Prop) : a ∧ a ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (assume h, ⟨h, h⟩)
/- or simp rules -/
lemma or.imp (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → d) : a ∨ b → c ∨ d :=
or.rec (λ h, or.inl (h₂ h)) (λ h, or.inr (h₃ h))
lemma or.imp_left (h : a → b) : a ∨ c → b ∨ c :=
or.imp h id
lemma or.imp_right (h : a → b) : c ∨ a → c ∨ b :=
or.imp id h
@[congr] lemma or_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ∨ b) ↔ (c ∨ d) :=
iff.intro (or.imp (iff.mp h₁) (iff.mp h₂)) (or.imp (iff.mpr h₁) (iff.mpr h₂))
@[simp] lemma or.comm : a ∨ b ↔ b ∨ a := iff.intro or.swap or.swap
lemma or_comm (a b : Prop) : a ∨ b ↔ b ∨ a := or.comm
@[simp] lemma or.assoc : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ a ∨ (b ∨ c) :=
iff.intro
(or.rec (or.imp_right or.inl) (λ h, or.inr (or.inr h)))
(or.rec (λ h, or.inl (or.inl h)) (or.imp_left or.inr))
lemma or_assoc (a b : Prop) : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ a ∨ (b ∨ c) :=
or.assoc
@[simp] lemma or.left_comm : a ∨ (b ∨ c) ↔ b ∨ (a ∨ c) :=
iff.trans (iff.symm or.assoc) (iff.trans (or_congr or.comm (iff.refl c)) or.assoc)
@[simp] lemma or_true (a : Prop) : a ∨ true ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (or.inr trivial)
@[simp] lemma true_or (a : Prop) : true ∨ a ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (or.inl trivial)
@[simp] lemma or_false (a : Prop) : a ∨ false ↔ a :=
iff.intro (or.rec id false.elim) or.inl
@[simp] lemma false_or (a : Prop) : false ∨ a ↔ a :=
iff.trans or.comm (or_false a)
@[simp] lemma or_self (a : Prop) : a ∨ a ↔ a :=
iff.intro (or.rec id id) or.inl
lemma not_or {a b : Prop} : ¬ a → ¬ b → ¬ (a ∨ b)
| hna hnb (or.inl ha) := absurd ha hna
| hna hnb (or.inr hb) := absurd hb hnb
/- or resolution rulse -/
def or.resolve_left {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ b) (na : ¬ a) : b :=
or.elim h (λ ha, absurd ha na) id
def or.neg_resolve_left {a b : Prop} (h : ¬ a ∨ b) (ha : a) : b :=
or.elim h (λ na, absurd ha na) id
def or.resolve_right {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ b) (nb : ¬ b) : a :=
or.elim h id (λ hb, absurd hb nb)
def or.neg_resolve_right {a b : Prop} (h : a ∨ ¬ b) (hb : b) : a :=
or.elim h id (λ nb, absurd hb nb)
/- iff simp rules -/
@[simp] lemma iff_true (a : Prop) : (a ↔ true) ↔ a :=
iff.intro (assume h, iff.mpr h trivial) iff_true_intro
@[simp] lemma true_iff (a : Prop) : (true ↔ a) ↔ a :=
iff.trans iff.comm (iff_true a)
@[simp] lemma iff_false (a : Prop) : (a ↔ false) ↔ ¬ a :=
iff.intro iff.mp iff_false_intro
@[simp] lemma false_iff (a : Prop) : (false ↔ a) ↔ ¬ a :=
iff.trans iff.comm (iff_false a)
@[simp] lemma iff_self (a : Prop) : (a ↔ a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro iff.rfl
@[congr] lemma iff_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ↔ b) ↔ (c ↔ d) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies a b).trans
((and_congr (imp_congr h₁ h₂) (imp_congr h₂ h₁)).trans
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies c d).symm)
/- implies simp rule -/
@[simp] lemma implies_true_iff (α : Sort u) : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ ha h, trivial)
@[simp] lemma false_implies_iff (a : Prop) : (false → a) ↔ true :=
iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ ha h, false.elim h)
/- exists -/
inductive Exists {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) : Prop
| intro : ∀ (a : α), p a → Exists
attribute [intro] Exists.intro
@[pattern]
def exists.intro := @Exists.intro
notation `exists` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, Exists P) := r
notation `∃` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, Exists P) := r
lemma exists.elim {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
(h₁ : ∃ x, p x) (h₂ : ∀ (a : α), p a → b) : b :=
Exists.rec h₂ h₁
/- exists unique -/
def exists_unique {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) :=
∃ x, p x ∧ ∀ y, p y → y = x
notation `∃!` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, exists_unique P) := r
attribute [intro]
lemma exists_unique.intro {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} (w : α) (h₁ : p w) (h₂ : ∀ y, p y → y = w) :
∃! x, p x :=
exists.intro w ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
attribute [recursor 4]
lemma exists_unique.elim {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
(h₂ : ∃! x, p x) (h₁ : ∀ x, p x → (∀ y, p y → y = x) → b) : b :=
exists.elim h₂ (λ w hw, h₁ w (and.left hw) (and.right hw))
lemma exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop}
(hex : ∃ x, p x) (hunique : ∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ → p y₂ → y₁ = y₂) : ∃! x, p x :=
exists.elim hex (λ x px, exists_unique.intro x px (take y, suppose p y, hunique y x this px))
lemma exists_of_exists_unique {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃! x, p x) : ∃ x, p x :=
exists.elim h (λ x hx, ⟨x, and.left hx⟩)
lemma unique_of_exists_unique {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∃! x, p x) {y₁ y₂ : α} (py₁ : p y₁) (py₂ : p y₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
exists_unique.elim h
(take x, suppose p x,
assume unique : ∀ y, p y → y = x,
show y₁ = y₂, from eq.trans (unique _ py₁) (eq.symm (unique _ py₂)))
/- exists, forall, exists unique congruences -/
@[congr] lemma forall_congr {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a ↔ q a)) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, q a :=
iff.intro (λ p a, iff.mp (h a) (p a)) (λ q a, iff.mpr (h a) (q a))
lemma exists_imp_exists {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a → q a)) (p : ∃ a, p a) : ∃ a, q a :=
exists.elim p (λ a hp, ⟨a, h a hp⟩)
@[congr] lemma exists_congr {α : Sort u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, (p a ↔ q a)) : (Exists p) ↔ ∃ a, q a :=
iff.intro
(exists_imp_exists (λ a, iff.mp (h a)))
(exists_imp_exists (λ a, iff.mpr (h a)))
@[congr] lemma exists_unique_congr {α : Sort u} {p₁ p₂ : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p₁ x ↔ p₂ x) : (exists_unique p₁) ↔ (∃! x, p₂ x) := --
exists_congr (λ x, and_congr (h x) (forall_congr (λ y, imp_congr (h y) iff.rfl)))
lemma forall_not_of_not_exists {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : ¬(∃ x, p x) → (∀ x, ¬p x) :=
λ hne x hp, hne ⟨x, hp⟩
/- decidable -/
def decidable.to_bool (p : Prop) [h : decidable p] : bool :=
decidable.cases_on h (λ h₁, bool.ff) (λ h₂, bool.tt)
export decidable (is_true is_false to_bool)
instance decidable.true : decidable true :=
is_true trivial
instance decidable.false : decidable false :=
is_false not_false
-- We use "dependent" if-then-else to be able to communicate the if-then-else condition
-- to the branches
@[inline] def dite (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} : (c → α) → (¬ c → α) → α :=
λ t e, decidable.rec_on h e t
/- if-then-else -/
@[inline] def ite (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t e : α) : α :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ hnc, e) (λ hc, t)
namespace decidable
variables {p q : Prop}
def rec_on_true [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u} (h₃ : p) (h₄ : h₁ h₃)
: decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁ :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ h, false.rec _ (h h₃)) (λ h, h₄)
def rec_on_false [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u} (h₃ : ¬p) (h₄ : h₂ h₃)
: decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁ :=
decidable.rec_on h (λ h, h₄) (λ h, false.rec _ (h₃ h))
def by_cases {q : Sort u} [φ : decidable p] : (p → q) → (¬p → q) → q := dite _
lemma em (p : Prop) [decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p := by_cases or.inl or.inr
lemma by_contradiction [decidable p] (h : ¬p → false) : p :=
if h₁ : p then h₁ else false.rec _ (h h₁)
end decidable
section
variables {p q : Prop}
def decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (hp : decidable p) (h : p ↔ q) : decidable q :=
if hp : p then is_true (iff.mp h hp)
else is_false (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h) hp)
def decidable_of_decidable_of_eq (hp : decidable p) (h : p = q) : decidable q :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff hp h.to_iff
protected def or.by_cases [decidable p] [decidable q] {α : Sort u}
(h : p ∨ q) (h₁ : p → α) (h₂ : q → α) : α :=
if hp : p then h₁ hp else
if hq : q then h₂ hq else
false.rec _ (or.elim h hp hq)
end
section
variables {p q : Prop}
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ∧ q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_true ⟨hp, hq⟩
else is_false (assume h : p ∧ q, hq (and.right h))
else is_false (assume h : p ∧ q, hp (and.left h))
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ∨ q) :=
if hp : p then is_true (or.inl hp) else
if hq : q then is_true (or.inr hq) else
is_false (or.rec hp hq)
instance [decidable p] : decidable (¬p) :=
if hp : p then is_false (absurd hp) else is_true hp
instance implies.decidable [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p → q) :=
if hp : p then
if hq : q then is_true (assume h, hq)
else is_false (assume h : p → q, absurd (h hp) hq)
else is_true (assume h, absurd h hp)
instance [decidable p] [decidable q] : decidable (p ↔ q) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff and.decidable (iff_iff_implies_and_implies p q).symm
end
instance {α : Sort u} [decidable_eq α] (a b : α) : decidable (a ≠ b) :=
implies.decidable
lemma bool.ff_ne_tt : ff = tt → false
.
def is_dec_eq {α : Sort u} (p : α → α → bool) : Prop := ∀ ⦃x y : α⦄, p x y = tt → x = y
def is_dec_refl {α : Sort u} (p : α → α → bool) : Prop := ∀ x, p x x = tt
open decidable
instance : decidable_eq bool
| ff ff := is_true rfl
| ff tt := is_false bool.ff_ne_tt
| tt ff := is_false (ne.symm bool.ff_ne_tt)
| tt tt := is_true rfl
def decidable_eq_of_bool_pred {α : Sort u} {p : α → α → bool} (h₁ : is_dec_eq p) (h₂ : is_dec_refl p) : decidable_eq α :=
take x y : α,
if hp : p x y = tt then is_true (h₁ hp)
else is_false (assume hxy : x = y, absurd (h₂ y) (@eq.rec_on _ _ (λ z, ¬p z y = tt) _ hxy hp))
lemma decidable_eq_inl_refl {α : Sort u} [h : decidable_eq α] (a : α) : h a a = is_true (eq.refl a) :=
match (h a a) with
| (is_true e) := rfl
| (is_false n) := absurd rfl n
end
lemma decidable_eq_inr_neg {α : Sort u} [h : decidable_eq α] {a b : α} : Π n : a ≠ b, h a b = is_false n :=
assume n,
match (h a b) with
| (is_true e) := absurd e n
| (is_false n₁) := proof_irrel n n₁ ▸ eq.refl (is_false n)
end
/- inhabited -/
class inhabited (α : Sort u) :=
(default : α)
def default (α : Sort u) [inhabited α] : α :=
inhabited.default α
@[inline, irreducible] def arbitrary (α : Sort u) [inhabited α] : α :=
default α
instance prop.inhabited : inhabited Prop :=
⟨true⟩
instance fun.inhabited (α : Sort u) {β : Sort v} [h : inhabited β] : inhabited (α → β) :=
inhabited.rec_on h (λ b, ⟨λ a, b⟩)
instance pi.inhabited (α : Sort u) {β : α → Sort v} [Π x, inhabited (β x)] : inhabited (Π x, β x) :=
⟨λ a, default (β a)⟩
instance : inhabited bool :=
⟨ff⟩
instance : inhabited pos_num :=
⟨pos_num.one⟩
instance : inhabited num :=
⟨num.zero⟩
class inductive nonempty (α : Sort u) : Prop
| intro : α → nonempty
protected def nonempty.elim {α : Sort u} {p : Prop} (h₁ : nonempty α) (h₂ : α → p) : p :=
nonempty.rec h₂ h₁
instance nonempty_of_inhabited {α : Sort u} [inhabited α] : nonempty α :=
⟨default α⟩
lemma nonempty_of_exists {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) → nonempty α
| ⟨w, h⟩ := ⟨w⟩
/- subsingleton -/
class inductive subsingleton (α : Sort u) : Prop
| intro : (∀ a b : α, a = b) → subsingleton
protected def subsingleton.elim {α : Sort u} [h : subsingleton α] : ∀ (a b : α), a = b :=
subsingleton.rec (λ p, p) h
protected def subsingleton.helim {α β : Sort u} [h : subsingleton α] (h : α = β) : ∀ (a : α) (b : β), a == b :=
eq.rec_on h (λ a b : α, heq_of_eq (subsingleton.elim a b))
instance subsingleton_prop (p : Prop) : subsingleton p :=
⟨λ a b, proof_irrel a b⟩
instance (p : Prop) : subsingleton (decidable p) :=
subsingleton.intro (λ d₁,
match d₁ with
| (is_true t₁) := (λ d₂,
match d₂ with
| (is_true t₂) := eq.rec_on (proof_irrel t₁ t₂) rfl
| (is_false f₂) := absurd t₁ f₂
end)
| (is_false f₁) := (λ d₂,
match d₂ with
| (is_true t₂) := absurd t₂ f₁
| (is_false f₂) := eq.rec_on (proof_irrel f₁ f₂) rfl
end)
end)
protected lemma rec_subsingleton {p : Prop} [h : decidable p] {h₁ : p → Sort u} {h₂ : ¬p → Sort u}
[h₃ : Π (h : p), subsingleton (h₁ h)] [h₄ : Π (h : ¬p), subsingleton (h₂ h)]
: subsingleton (decidable.rec_on h h₂ h₁) :=
match h with
| (is_true h) := h₃ h
| (is_false h) := h₄ h
end
lemma if_pos {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hc : c) {α : Sort u} {t e : α} : (ite c t e) = t :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := absurd hc hnc
end
lemma if_neg {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hnc : ¬c) {α : Sort u} {t e : α} : (ite c t e) = e :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := absurd hc hnc
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
attribute [simp]
lemma if_t_t (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t : α) : (ite c t t) = t :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
lemma implies_of_if_pos {c t e : Prop} [decidable c] (h : ite c t e) : c → t :=
assume hc, eq.rec_on (if_pos hc : ite c t e = t) h
lemma implies_of_if_neg {c t e : Prop} [decidable c] (h : ite c t e) : ¬c → e :=
assume hnc, eq.rec_on (if_neg hnc : ite c t e = e) h
lemma if_ctx_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → x = u) (h_e : ¬c → y = v) :
ite b x y = ite c u v :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
@[congr]
lemma if_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x = u) (h_e : y = v) :
ite b x y = ite c u v :=
@if_ctx_congr α b c dec_b dec_c x y u v h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
lemma if_ctx_simp_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] {x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → x = u) (h_e : ¬c → y = v) :
ite b x y = (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) α u v) :=
@if_ctx_congr α b c dec_b (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) x y u v h_c h_t h_e
@[congr]
lemma if_simp_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] {x y u v : α}
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x = u) (h_e : y = v) :
ite b x y = (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) α u v) :=
@if_ctx_simp_congr α b c dec_b x y u v h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
@[simp]
lemma if_true {α : Sort u} {h : decidable true} (t e : α) : (@ite true h α t e) = t :=
if_pos trivial
@[simp]
lemma if_false {α : Sort u} {h : decidable false} (t e : α) : (@ite false h α t e) = e :=
if_neg not_false
lemma if_ctx_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → (x ↔ u)) (h_e : ¬c → (y ↔ v)) :
ite b x y ↔ ite c u v :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
@[congr]
lemma if_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x ↔ u) (h_e : y ↔ v) :
ite b x y ↔ ite c u v :=
if_ctx_congr_prop h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
lemma if_ctx_simp_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : c → (x ↔ u)) (h_e : ¬c → (y ↔ v)) :
ite b x y ↔ (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) Prop u v) :=
@if_ctx_congr_prop b c x y u v dec_b (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) h_c h_t h_e
@[congr]
lemma if_simp_congr_prop {b c x y u v : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
(h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x ↔ u) (h_e : y ↔ v) :
ite b x y ↔ (@ite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) Prop u v) :=
@if_ctx_simp_congr_prop b c x y u v dec_b h_c (λ h, h_t) (λ h, h_e)
lemma dif_pos {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hc : c) {α : Sort u} {t : c → α} {e : ¬ c → α} : dite c t e = t hc :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := absurd hc hnc
end
lemma dif_neg {c : Prop} [h : decidable c] (hnc : ¬c) {α : Sort u} {t : c → α} {e : ¬ c → α} : dite c t e = e hnc :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := absurd hc hnc
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
lemma dif_ctx_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b] [dec_c : decidable c]
{x : b → α} {u : c → α} {y : ¬b → α} {v : ¬c → α}
(h_c : b ↔ c)
(h_t : ∀ (h : c), x (iff.mpr h_c h) = u h)
(h_e : ∀ (h : ¬c), y (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h) = v h) :
(@dite b dec_b α x y) = (@dite c dec_c α u v) :=
match dec_b, dec_c with
| (is_false h₁), (is_false h₂) := h_e h₂
| (is_true h₁), (is_true h₂) := h_t h₂
| (is_false h₁), (is_true h₂) := absurd h₂ (iff.mp (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₁)
| (is_true h₁), (is_false h₂) := absurd h₁ (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h₂)
end
lemma dif_ctx_simp_congr {α : Sort u} {b c : Prop} [dec_b : decidable b]
{x : b → α} {u : c → α} {y : ¬b → α} {v : ¬c → α}
(h_c : b ↔ c)
(h_t : ∀ (h : c), x (iff.mpr h_c h) = u h)
(h_e : ∀ (h : ¬c), y (iff.mpr (not_iff_not_of_iff h_c) h) = v h) :
(@dite b dec_b α x y) = (@dite c (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) α u v) :=
@dif_ctx_congr α b c dec_b (decidable_of_decidable_of_iff dec_b h_c) x u y v h_c h_t h_e
-- Remark: dite and ite are "defally equal" when we ignore the proofs.
lemma dif_eq_if (c : Prop) [h : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t : α) (e : α) : dite c (λ h, t) (λ h, e) = ite c t e :=
match h with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := rfl
end
instance {c t e : Prop} [d_c : decidable c] [d_t : decidable t] [d_e : decidable e] : decidable (if c then t else e) :=
match d_c with
| (is_true hc) := d_t
| (is_false hc) := d_e
end
instance {c : Prop} {t : c → Prop} {e : ¬c → Prop} [d_c : decidable c] [d_t : ∀ h, decidable (t h)] [d_e : ∀ h, decidable (e h)] : decidable (if h : c then t h else e h) :=
match d_c with
| (is_true hc) := d_t hc
| (is_false hc) := d_e hc
end
def as_true (c : Prop) [decidable c] : Prop :=
if c then true else false
def as_false (c : Prop) [decidable c] : Prop :=
if c then false else true
def of_as_true {c : Prop} [h₁ : decidable c] (h₂ : as_true c) : c :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| (is_true h_c), h₂ := h_c
| (is_false h_c), h₂ := false.elim h₂
end
/- Universe lifting operation -/
structure {r s} ulift (α : Type s) : Type (max s r) :=
up :: (down : α)
namespace ulift
/- Bijection between α and ulift.{v} α -/
lemma up_down {α : Type u} : ∀ (b : ulift.{v} α), up (down b) = b
| (up a) := rfl
lemma down_up {α : Type u} (a : α) : down (up.{v} a) = a :=
rfl
end ulift
/- Universe lifting operation from Sort to Type -/
structure plift (α : Sort u) : Type u :=
up :: (down : α)
namespace plift
/- Bijection between α and slift α -/
lemma up_down {α : Sort u} : ∀ (b : plift α), up (down b) = b
| (up a) := rfl
lemma down_up {α : Sort u} (a : α) : down (up a) = a :=
rfl
end plift
/- Equalities for rewriting let-expressions -/
lemma let_value_eq {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : α → β) :
a₁ = a₂ → (let x : α := a₁ in b x) = (let x : α := a₂ in b x) :=
λ h, eq.rec_on h rfl
lemma let_value_heq {α : Sort v} {β : α → Sort u} {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : Π x : α, β x) :
a₁ = a₂ → (let x : α := a₁ in b x) == (let x : α := a₂ in b x) :=
λ h, eq.rec_on h (heq.refl (b a₁))
lemma let_body_eq {α : Sort v} {β : α → Sort u} (a : α) {b₁ b₂ : Π x : α, β x} :
(∀ x, b₁ x = b₂ x) → (let x : α := a in b₁ x) = (let x : α := a in b₂ x) :=
λ h, h a
lemma let_eq {α : Sort v} {β : Sort u} {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : α → β} :
a₁ = a₂ → (∀ x, b₁ x = b₂ x) → (let x : α := a₁ in b₁ x) = (let x : α := a₂ in b₂ x) :=
λ h₁ h₂, eq.rec_on h₁ (h₂ a₁)
section relation
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (r : β → β → Prop)
local infix `≺`:50 := r
def reflexive := ∀ x, x ≺ x
def symmetric := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ x
def transitive := ∀ ⦃x y z⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ z → x ≺ z
def equivalence := reflexive r ∧ symmetric r ∧ transitive r
def total := ∀ x y, x ≺ y ∨ y ≺ x
def mk_equivalence (rfl : reflexive r) (symm : symmetric r) (trans : transitive r) : equivalence r :=
⟨rfl, symm, trans⟩
def irreflexive := ∀ x, ¬ x ≺ x
def anti_symmetric := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≺ y → y ≺ x → x = y
def empty_relation := λ a₁ a₂ : α, false
def subrelation (q r : β → β → Prop) := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, q x y → r x y
def inv_image (f : α → β) : α → α → Prop :=
λ a₁ a₂, f a₁ ≺ f a₂
lemma inv_image.trans (f : α → β) (h : transitive r) : transitive (inv_image r f) :=
λ (a₁ a₂ a₃ : α) (h₁ : inv_image r f a₁ a₂) (h₂ : inv_image r f a₂ a₃), h h₁ h₂
lemma inv_image.irreflexive (f : α → β) (h : irreflexive r) : irreflexive (inv_image r f) :=
λ (a : α) (h₁ : inv_image r f a a), h (f a) h₁
inductive tc {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) : α → α → Prop
| base : ∀ a b, r a b → tc a b
| trans : ∀ a b c, tc a b → tc b c → tc a c
end relation
section binary
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
variable f : α → α → α
variable inv : α → α
variable one : α
local notation a * b := f a b
local notation a ⁻¹ := inv a
variable g : α → α → α
local notation a + b := g a b
def commutative := ∀ a b, a * b = b * a
def associative := ∀ a b c, (a * b) * c = a * (b * c)
def left_identity := ∀ a, one * a = a
def right_identity := ∀ a, a * one = a
def right_inverse := ∀ a, a * a⁻¹ = one
def left_cancelative := ∀ a b c, a * b = a * c → b = c
def right_cancelative := ∀ a b c, a * b = c * b → a = c
def left_distributive := ∀ a b c, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
def right_distributive := ∀ a b c, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
def right_commutative (h : β → α → β) := ∀ b a₁ a₂, h (h b a₁) a₂ = h (h b a₂) a₁
def left_commutative (h : α → β → β) := ∀ a₁ a₂ b, h a₁ (h a₂ b) = h a₂ (h a₁ b)
lemma left_comm : commutative f → associative f → left_commutative f :=
assume hcomm hassoc, take a b c, calc
a*(b*c) = (a*b)*c : eq.symm (hassoc a b c)
... = (b*a)*c : hcomm a b ▸ rfl
... = b*(a*c) : hassoc b a c
lemma right_comm : commutative f → associative f → right_commutative f :=
assume hcomm hassoc, take a b c, calc
(a*b)*c = a*(b*c) : hassoc a b c
... = a*(c*b) : hcomm b c ▸ rfl
... = (a*c)*b : eq.symm (hassoc a c b)
end binary
|
e1ac16e72c0e5715005c27133329ea3d8fbee6fc | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /tests/lean/run/def_ite_value.lean | 6f12d2ef97f59c7cc6ee5f8f8b52ebf6a9f224e2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 549 | lean |
inductive bv : nat → Type
| nil : bv 0
| cons : Π n, bool → bv n → bv (n+1)
open bv
definition f : ∀ n : nat, bv n → nat → nat
| (n+1) (cons .n b v) 1000000 := f n v 0
| (n+1) (cons .n b v) x := f n v (x + 1)
| _ _ _ := 1
set_option pp.binder_types true
check @f._main.equations.eqn_1
check @f._main.equations.eqn_2
check @f._main.equations.eqn_3
example (n : nat) (b : bool) (v : bv n) (x : nat) : x ≠ 1000000 → f (n+1) (cons n b v) x = f n v (x + 1) :=
assume H, f._main.equations.eqn_3 n b v x H
|
5fc87866785db266f952cdeaa489edd7f5b9a93d | 2bafba05c98c1107866b39609d15e849a4ca2bb8 | /src/week_7/Part_A_quotients.lean | 3078125091e495fcc7d5b90931ad7578dca40517 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ImperialCollegeLondon/formalising-mathematics | b54c83c94b5c315024ff09997fcd6b303892a749 | 7cf1d51c27e2038d2804561d63c74711924044a1 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,267,046,302 | 1,638,888,459,000 | 1,638,888,459,000 | 331,592,375 | 284 | 24 | Apache-2.0 | 1,669,593,705,000 | 1,611,224,849,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,236 | lean | import tactic
/-
# Quotients
The quotient of a type by an equivalence relation.
## Overview
A binary relation on a type `X` is just a function `r : X → X → Prop`,
that is, a true-false statement attached to each pair of elements of `X`.
If `r` is also reflexive, symmetric and transitive, we say it is an
equivalence relation. We will use the standard notation `x ≈ y`
for `r x y` below.
Given a type `X` and an equivalence relation `≈` on it, the type `clX` of
equivalence classes for `≈` comes equipped with a canonical function
`X → clX` (sending an element to its equivalence class), and it also satisfies
a universal property, namely that to give a map from `clX` to a type `T`
is to give a map `X → T` which is constant on equivalence classes.
Note however that other types other than the type of equivalence classes
may also satisfy this universal property. For example if we start with
a type `X` and a surjection `p : X → Y` and then define an equivalence
relation on `X` by `x₁ ≈ x₂ ↔ p x₁ = p x₂` then `Y` satisfies the same
universal property. In general it is a fact in mathematics that things
which define universal properties are unique up to unique isomorphism,
and things like the type of equivalence classes are just a *model* for
this general concept of quotient.
Lean does not use the equivalence class model when doing quotients.
Here's how it does it. The type `setoid X` is defined to be the type
of equivalence relations on `X`. If `s : setoid X` is an equivalence relation
then Lean defines `quotient s` to be a new type which satisfies the
universal property of quotients. Let us spell out what this means.
Firstly, it means that there is a map `p : X → quotient s`, and
secondly it means that to give a map `f : quotient s → T` is to
give `f ∘ p : X → T`, a map which is constant on equivalence classes.
In this file we will learn the various useful functions which Lean has
for dealing with quotients -- that is, the key definitions and theorems
which mathematicians use, sometimes subconsciously, when dealing with
quotients. We will learn them by explicitly working through an
example, namely the case where `X = ℕ²` and `(a,b) ≈ (c,d) ↔ a + d = c + b`.
In this case, the quotient is a model for the integers.
## More on universal properties.
Recall that if `X` and `T` are types, then `X → T` denotes the *type*
of functions from `X` to `T`. A mathematician might call this
type `Hom(X,T)`. A term `f : X → T` of this type is just a function
from `X` to `T`.
Let us now spell out the universal property more carefully.
Given a type `X` and an equivalence relation `≈` on `X`, we say
that a function `f : X → T` is *constant on equivalence classes*,
(or `≈`-equivariant for short), if `∀ x y : X, x ≈ y → f x = f y`.
We say that a pair `(Q, p)` consisting of a type `Q` and a
function `p : X → Q` are a *quotient* of `X` by `≈`
if `p` is constant on equivalence classes, and furthermore `p`
is *initial* with repect to this property. What does this mean?
Let me spell this out.
Let `(Q, p)` be a quotient of `X` by `≈`. Note first that if `T` is any
type and `g : Q → T` is any function, then `f := g ∘ p : X → T` is
constant on equivalence classes (because `p` is). Being *initial* is the claim
that this construction, starting with a function `g : Q → T` and
giving us a function `f : X → T` which is `≈`-equivariant,
is a *bijection* between `Q → T` and the subset of `X → T`
consisting of `≈`-equivariant functions. In diagrams, if `f` is
constant on equivalence classes, then there's a unique `g` which
fills in the diagram.
f
X ---------> T
| /\
| /
| p / ∃!g
| /
| /
\/
Q
One can easily check that the type of equivalence classes for `≈` satisfies
this universal property, with `p` being the map sending a term of type `X`
to its equivalence class. One can think of the type of equivalence classes
as a "model" for the quotient, in the same way that you might have seen
a model for the tensor product `V ⊗ W` of two vector spaces given
as a quotient of the vector space generated by pairs `(v,w)` by the subspace
generated by an appropriate collection of relations, or a model for
the localisation `R[1/S]` of a commutative ring at a multiplicative
subset given by `R × S` modulo a certain equivalence relation. Models
are useful. A model of an `n`-dimensional real vector space is obtained
by choosing a basis; then it can be identified with `ℝⁿ` enabling explicit
computations to be done.
But there are many other models for quotients. For example let's
say `X` and `Q` are any types, and `f : X → Q` is any surjection at all.
Define `≈` on `X` by `x ≈ y ↔ f x = f y`. It is easy to check that `Q` is a
quotient of `X` by `≈` simply because `Q` naturally bijects with the
equivalence classes of `≈`.
Lean does not use equivalence classes in its definition of the quotient
of `X` by `≈`. It chooses a different model. It is an opaque model, meaning
that you cannot actually see what the terms are.
But Lean and mathlib give you a very solid API for the quotient.
In particular, the quotient satisfies the universal property, so one
can prove that it bijects with the type of equivalence classes on `X`.
However, after a while one moves away from the "equivalence class"
way of thinking, and starts thinking more abstractly about quotients,
and so ultimately one does not really need this bijection at all.
You might wonder why Lean does not use the type of equivalence classes.
The reason is not a mathematical one -- it is simply to do with an
implementation issue which I will mention later.
Here is a guided tour of the API for Lean's quotients, worked out for
a specific example -- the integers, as a quotient of ℕ² by the
equivalence relation `(a,b) ≈ (c,d) ↔ a + d = c + b.`
-/
-- N2 is much easier to type than `ℕ × ℕ`
abbreviation N2 := ℕ × ℕ
namespace N2 -- all the functions below will be N2.something
-- Hmm, I guess I should run you through the API for products `×`.
/-
### products
The product of two types `X` and `Y` is `prod X Y`, with notation `X × Y`.
Hover over `×` to find out how to type it.
-/
section product
-- to make a term of a product, use round brackets.
def foo : N2 := (3,4)
-- To extract the first term of a product, use `.1` or `.fst`
example : foo.1 = 3 :=
begin
-- true by definition.
refl
end
example : foo.fst = 3 :=
begin
refl
end
-- similarly use `.2` or `.snd` to get the second term
example : foo.snd = 4 := rfl -- term mode reflexivity of equality
-- The extensionality tactic works for products: a product is determined
-- by the two parts used to make it.
example (X Y : Type) (s t : X × Y) (h1 : s.fst = t.fst) (h2 : s.snd = t.snd) :
s = t :=
begin
ext,
{ exact h1 },
{ exact h2 }
end
-- you can uses `cases x` on a product if you want to take it apart into
-- its two pieces
example (A B : Type) (x : A × B) : x = (x.1, x.2) :=
begin
-- note that this is not yet `refl` -- you have to take `x` apart.
cases x with a b,
-- ⊢ (a, b) = ((a, b).fst, (a, b).snd)
dsimp only, -- to tidy up: this replaces `(a, b).fst` with `a`.
-- ⊢ (a, b) = (a, b)
refl,
end
end product
/-
## Worked example: ℤ as a quotient of ℕ²
There's a surjection `ℕ × ℕ → ℤ` sending `(a,b)` to `a - b` (where here
`a` and `b` are regarded as integers). One checks easily that `(a,b)`
and `(c,d)` are sent to the same integer if and only if `a + d = b + c`.
Conversely one could just define an equivalence relation on ℕ × ℕ
by `ab ≈ cd ↔ ab.1 + cd.2 = cd.1 + ab.2` and then redefine ℤ -- or more
precisely define a second ℤ -- to be the quotient
by this equivalence relation. Let's set up this equivalence relation
and call the quotient `Z`. Recall we're using `N2` to mean `ℕ × ℕ`.
-/
def r (ab cd : N2) : Prop :=
ab.1 + cd.2 = cd.1 + ab.2
-- This is a definition so let's make a little API for it.
-- It's nice to be able to `rw` to get rid of explicit occurrences of `r`.
-- So let's make two lemmas suitable for rewriting.
lemma r_def (ab cd : N2) : r ab cd ↔ ab.1 + cd.2 = cd.1 + ab.2 :=
begin
refl
end
-- This one is more useful if you've already done `cases` on the pairs.
lemma r_def' (a b c d : ℕ) : r (a,b) (c,d) ↔ a + d = c + b :=
begin
refl
end
def r_refl : reflexive r :=
begin
-- you can start with `unfold reflexive` if you want to see what
-- you're supposed to be proving here.
sorry,
end
-- hint: `linarith` is good at linear arithmetic.
def r_symm : symmetric r :=
begin
sorry
end
def r_trans : transitive r :=
begin
sorry
end
-- now let's give N2 a setoid structure coming from `r`.
-- In other words, we tell the type class inference system
-- about `r`. Let's call it `setoid` and remember
-- we're in the `N2` namespace, so its full name
-- is N2.setoid
instance setoid : setoid N2 := ⟨r, r_refl, r_symm, r_trans⟩
-- Now we can use `≈` notation
example (x y : N2) : x ≈ y ↔ r x y :=
begin
-- true by definition
refl
end
-- `r x y` and `x ≈ y` are definitionally equal but not syntactically equal,
-- rather annoyingly, so we need two more lemmas enabling us to rewrite.
-- Let's teach them to `simp`, because they're the ones we'll be using
-- in practice.
@[simp] lemma equiv_def (ab cd : N2) : ab ≈ cd ↔ ab.1 + cd.2 = cd.1 + ab.2 :=
begin
refl
end
@[simp] lemma equiv_def' (a b c d : ℕ) : (a,b) ≈ (c,d) ↔ a + d = c + b :=
iff.rfl -- term mode variant
end N2
open N2
-- Now we can take the quotient!
def Z := quotient N2.setoid
namespace Z
-- And now we can finally start.
-- The map from N2 to Z is called `quotient.mk`
-- Recall `foo` is `(3,4)`
def bar : Z := quotient.mk foo -- bar is the image of `foo` in the quotient.
-- so it's morally -1.
-- Notation for `quotient.mk x` is `⟦x⟧`
example : bar = ⟦foo⟧ :=
begin
refl
end
/-
## Z
We have a new type `Z` now, and a way of going from `N2`
to `Z` (`quotient.mk`, with notation `⟦ ⟧`).
Here then are some things we can think about:
(1) How to prove the universal property for `Z`?
(2) How to put a ring structure on `Z`?
(3) How to define a map from `Z` to Lean's `ℤ`, which
is not defined as a quotient but also satisfies the
universal property?
We will do (1) and (2) in this file. Let's start with (1).
The claim is that to give
a map `Z → T` is to give a map `N2 → T`
which is constant on equivalence classes. The
construction: given a map `Z → T`, just
compose with `quotient.mk : N2 → Z`.
What do we need to prove here?
First we need to prove that `quotient.mk` is `≈`-equivariant.
In other words, we need to prove `x ≈ y → ⟦x⟧ = ⟦y⟧`.
-/
example (x y : N2) : x ≈ y → ⟦x⟧ = ⟦y⟧ :=
quotient.sound
-- Of course we know the other implication is also true.
-- This is called `quotient.exact`.
example (x y : N2) : ⟦x⟧ = ⟦y⟧ → x ≈ y :=
quotient.exact
-- The iff statement (useful for rewrites) is called `quotient.eq` :
example (x y : N2) : ⟦x⟧ = ⟦y⟧ ↔ x ≈ y :=
quotient.eq
-- So now we can define the map from `Z → T` to the subtype of `N2 → T`
-- consisting of `≈`-equivariant functions.
variable {T : Type}
/- Given a map `g : Z → T`, make a function `f : N2 → T` which is
constant on equivalence classes. -/
def universal1 (g : Z → T) :
{f : N2 → T // ∀ x y : N2, x ≈ y → f x = f y} :=
⟨λ n2, g ⟦n2⟧, begin
sorry
end⟩
-- To go the other way, we use a new function called `quotient.lift`.
-- Note that this is a weird name for the construction, at least if your
-- mental picture has the quotient underneath the type with the relation.
-- But we're stuck with it.
/- Given a map `f : N2 → T` plus the assumption that it is constant on
equivalence classes, "lift" this map to a map `Z → T`. -/
def universal2 (f : N2 → T) (hf : ∀ x y : N2, x ≈ y → f x = f y) :
Z → T :=
quotient.lift f hf
-- So now the big question is: how do we prove that these two constructions
-- are inverse to each other? In other words, what is the API for
-- the definition `quotient.lift`?
-- Let's start by showing that going from `N2 → T` to `Z → T` (via `quotient.lift`)
-- and then back to `N2 → T` (via composing with `quotient.mk`) is the
-- identity function. Recall `⟦⟧` is the notation for `quotient.mk`.
-- Another way of writing the example below : universal2 ∘ universal1 = id.
example (f : N2 → T) (hf : ∀ x y : N2, x ≈ y → f x = f y) :
f = λ n2, quotient.lift f hf ⟦n2⟧ :=
begin
-- true by definition!
refl
end
-- This is the reason quotients are defined as a black box; if we had
-- defined them to be equivalence classes this would be true, but
-- not by definition. To a mathematician this is not really a big deal,
-- but it is what it is.
-- To go the other way, proving universal1 ∘ universal2 = id, the key thing
-- to know is a function
-- called `quotient.induction_on`:
example (g : Z → T) : g = quotient.lift (λ n2, g ⟦n2⟧) (universal1 g).2 :=
begin
-- two functions are equal if they agree on all inputs
ext z,
-- now use `quotient.induction_on` (this is the key move)
apply quotient.induction_on z,
-- and now we're in the situation of the above example again
intro ab,
-- so it's true by definition.
refl,
end
-- We have hence proved that `universal1` and `universal2` are inverse
-- bijections, at least in this `N2 → Z` case. In `Part_C` we will do
-- this in general, but there is a ton of material this week so
-- don't worry if you don't get to it.
/-
## Giving Z a commutative ring structure
Let's now show how to give this quotient object `Z` a commutative ring
structure, which it somehow wants to inherit from structures on `ℕ`. Recall
that a ring is a choice of `0`, `1`, and functions `+`, `-` and `*`
satisfying some axioms. After a while this all becomes straightforward
and boring, so I will go through the proof that it's an abelian group
under addition carefully and then the multiplication part is just more
of the same -- feel free to skip it.
### zero and one
We start by giving `Z` a zero and a one.
-/
def zero : Z := ⟦(0, 0)⟧
def one : Z := ⟦(1, 0)⟧
-- We don't have the numeral notation yet though:
-- #check (0 : Z) -- error about failing to find an instance of `has_zero Z`
-- Let's use numeral notation `0` and `1` for `zero` and `one`.
instance : has_zero Z := ⟨zero⟩
instance : has_one Z := ⟨one⟩
-- let's start to train the simplifier
@[simp] lemma zero_def : (0 : Z) = ⟦(0, 0)⟧ := rfl -- works
@[simp] lemma one_def : (1 : Z) = ⟦(1, 0)⟧ := rfl
/-
### negation
Let's do negation next, by which I mean the function sending `z` to `-z`,
because this is a function which only takes one input (addition takes two).
Here is how a mathematician might describe defining negation on the
equivalence classes of `ℕ × ℕ`. They might say this:
1) choose an element `z` of the quotient `Z`.
2) lift it randomly to a pair `(a, b)` of natural numbers.
3) Define `-z` to be `⟦(b,a)⟧`
4) Now let us check that this definition did not depend on the random lift in (2):
[and then they prove a lemma saying the construction is well-defined, i.e.
that if `(a, b) ≈ (c,d)` then `⟦(b, a)⟧ = ⟦(d, c)⟧` ]
This is the way mathematicians are taught. We will use *the same
construction* in Lean but we will phrase it differently.
1') Define an auxiliary map `N2 → Z` by sending `(a,b)` to `⟦(b,a)⟧`
2') I claim that this function is constant on equivalence classes
[and then we prove a lemma saying `(a, b) ≈ (c, d) → ⟦(b, a)⟧ = ⟦(d, c)⟧`
3') Now use `quotient.lift` to descend this to a map from `Z` to `Z`.
So as you can see, the mathematics is the same, but the emphasis is slightly
different.
-/
-- Here's the auxiliary map.
def neg_aux (ab : N2) : Z := ⟦(ab.2, ab.1)⟧
-- useful for rewriting. Let's teach it to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma neg_aux_def (ab : N2) : neg_aux ab = ⟦(ab.2, ab.1)⟧ := rfl
-- true by def
-- In the process of making this definition we need to prove a theorem
-- saying neg_aux is constant on equivalence classes.
def neg : Z → Z := quotient.lift neg_aux
begin
-- ⊢ ∀ (a b : N2), a ≈ b → neg_aux a = neg_aux b
sorry,
end
-- `-z` notation
instance : has_neg Z := ⟨neg⟩
-- Let's teach the definition of `neg` to the simplifier.
@[simp] lemma neg_def (a b : ℕ) : (-⟦(a, b)⟧ : Z) = ⟦(b, a)⟧ := rfl
/-
## Addition
If we use `quotient.lift` for defining addition, we'd have to use it twice.
We define `⟦(a, b)⟧ + ⟦(c, d)⟧ = ⟦(a + c, b + d)⟧` and would then have
to check it was independent of the choice of lift `(a, b)` in one lemma,
and then in a second proof check it was independent of the choice of `(c, d)`.
The variant `quotient.lift₂` enables us to prove both results in one go.
It says that if `f : A → B → C` is a function which and `A` and `B`
have equivalence relations on them, and `f` is constant on equivalence
classes in both the `A` and the `B` variable, then `f` descends ("lifts")
to a function `A/~ → B/~ → C`.
-/
-- auxiliary definition of addition (note `(a-b)+(c-d)=(a+c)-(b+d)` )
def add_aux (ab cd : N2) : Z := ⟦(ab.1 + cd.1, ab.2 + cd.2)⟧
-- useful for rewriting
@[simp] lemma add_aux_def (ab cd : N2) :
add_aux ab cd = ⟦(ab.1 + cd.1, ab.2 + cd.2)⟧ :=
rfl -- true by def
def add : Z → Z → Z := quotient.lift₂ add_aux
begin
sorry,
end
-- notation for addition
instance : has_add Z := ⟨add⟩
-- train the simplifier, because we have some axioms to prove about `+`
@[simp] lemma add_def (a b c d : ℕ) :
(⟦(a, b)⟧ + ⟦(c, d)⟧ : Z) = ⟦(a+c, b+d)⟧ :=
rfl
-- may as well get subtraction working
def sub (x y : Z) : Z := x + -y
instance : has_sub Z := ⟨sub⟩
/-
## Z is a commutative group under addition
-/
def add_comm_group : add_comm_group Z :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
neg := has_neg.neg,
sub := has_sub.sub,
-- The key is always `quotient.induction_on`
-- I'll do the first one for you.
zero_add := begin
intro x,
apply quotient.induction_on x, clear x,
rintro ⟨a, b⟩,
simp,
end,
add_zero := begin
sorry
end,
-- Here there are three variables so it's `quotient.induction_on₃`
-- Remember the `ring` tactic will prove identities in `ℕ`.
add_assoc := begin
sorry
end,
add_left_neg := begin
sorry
end,
add_comm := begin
sorry
end,
}
/-
## More of the same : Z is a commutative ring.
I would recommend skipping this and going onto Part B.
There are no more ideas here, this is just to prove that it can be done.
A mild variant: let's do multiplication in a slightly different way.
Instead of using `quotient.lift₂` (which descends a map `N2 → N2 → Z` to a
map `Z → Z → Z`) we'll use `quotient.map₂`, which descends a
map `N2 → N2 → N2` to a map `Z → Z → Z`.
-/
-- auxiliary definition of multiplication: `(a-b)*(c-d) = (a*c+b*d)-(a*d+b*c)`
def mul_aux (ab cd : N2) : N2 :=
(ab.1 * cd.1 + ab.2 * cd.2, ab.1 * cd.2 + ab.2 * cd.1)
@[simp] lemma mul_aux_def (a b c d : ℕ) :
mul_aux (a,b) (c,d) = (a*c+b*d,a*d+b*c) := rfl
-- The key result you have to prove here involves multiplication so is
-- unfortunately non-linear. However `nlinarith` is OK at non-linear arithmetic...
def mul : Z → Z → Z := quotient.map₂ mul_aux
begin
sorry
end
-- notation for multiplication
instance : has_mul Z := ⟨mul⟩
@[simp] lemma mul_def (a b c d : ℕ) :
(⟦(a, b)⟧ * ⟦(c, d)⟧ : Z) = ⟦(a*c+b*d, a*d+b*c)⟧ := rfl
-- now let's prove that Z is a commutative ring!
def comm_ring : comm_ring Z :=
{ one := 1,
add := (+),
mul := (*),
mul_assoc := begin
intros x y z,
apply quotient.induction_on₃ x y z, clear x y z,
rintros ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨c, d⟩ ⟨e, f⟩,
simp,
ring,
end,
-- etc etc
one_mul := begin
sorry
end,
mul_one := begin
sorry
end,
left_distrib := begin
sorry
end,
right_distrib := begin
sorry
end,
mul_comm := begin
sorry
end,
..add_comm_group
}
end Z
|
9cc2fb78ee029ab7a9674580b896d849d01e1069 | 82b86ba2ae0d5aed0f01f49c46db5afec0eb2bd7 | /tests/lean/inductionErrors.lean | 32b3038cb7f4f0469a6c0dd6d5afa079a9431f5f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | banksonian/lean4 | 3a2e6b0f1eb63aa56ff95b8d07b2f851072d54dc | 78da6b3aa2840693eea354a41e89fc5b212a5011 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,703,624,165 | 1,605,123,551,000 | 1,605,123,551,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,420 | lean | universes u
axiom elimEx (motive : Nat → Nat → Sort u) (x y : Nat)
(diag : (a : Nat) → motive a a)
(upper : (delta a : Nat) → motive a (a + delta.succ))
(lower : (delta a : Nat) → motive (a + delta.succ) a)
: motive y x
theorem ex1 (p q : Nat) : p ≤ q ∨ p > q := by
cases p, q using elimEx
| lower d => apply Or.inl -- Error
| upper d => apply Or.inr -- Error
| diag => apply Or.inl; apply Nat.leRefl
theorem ex2 (p q : Nat) : p ≤ q ∨ p > q := by
cases p, q using elimEx2 -- Error
| lower d => apply Or.inl
| upper d => apply Or.inr
| diag => apply Or.inl; apply Nat.leRefl
theorem ex3 (p q : Nat) : p ≤ q ∨ p > q := by
cases p /- Error -/ using elimEx
| lower d => apply Or.inl
| upper d => apply Or.inr
| diag => apply Or.inl; apply Nat.leRefl
theorem ex4 (p q : Nat) : p ≤ q ∨ p > q := by
cases p using Nat.add -- Error
| lower d => apply Or.inl
| upper d => apply Or.inr
| diag => apply Or.inl; apply Nat.leRefl
theorem ex5 (x : Nat) : 0 + x = x := by
match x with
| 0 => done -- Error
| y+1 => done -- Error
theorem ex5b (x : Nat) : 0 + x = x := by
cases x
| zero => done -- Error
| succ y => done -- Error
inductive Vec : Nat → Type
| nil : Vec 0
| cons : Bool → {n : Nat} → Vec n → Vec (n+1)
theorem ex6 (x : Vec 0) : x = Vec.nil := by
cases x using Vec.casesOn
| nil => rfl
| cons => done -- Error
theorem ex7 (x : Vec 0) : x = Vec.nil := by
cases x -- Error: TODO: improve error location
| nil => rfl
| cons => done
theorem ex8 (p q : Nat) : p ≤ q ∨ p > q := by
cases p, q using elimEx
| lower d => apply Or.inl; admit
| upper2 /- Error -/ d => apply Or.inr
| diag => apply Or.inl; apply Nat.leRefl
theorem ex9 (p q : Nat) : p ≤ q ∨ p > q := by
cases p, q using elimEx
| lower d => apply Or.inl; admit
| _ => apply Or.inr; admit
| diag => apply Or.inl; apply Nat.leRefl
theorem ex10 (p q : Nat) : p ≤ q ∨ p > q := by
cases p, q using elimEx
| lower d => apply Or.inl; admit
| upper d => apply Or.inr; admit
| diag => apply Or.inl; apply Nat.leRefl
| _ /- error unused -/ => admit
theorem ex11 (p q : Nat) : p ≤ q ∨ p > q := by
cases p, q using elimEx
| lower d => apply Or.inl; admit
| upper d => apply Or.inr; admit
| lower d /- error unused -/ => apply Or.inl; admit
| diag => apply Or.inl; apply Nat.leRefl
|
8d1fb0c36a3c5f86e617c04bdd371dae01994886 | ba4794a0deca1d2aaa68914cd285d77880907b5c | /src/game/world1/level2.lean | 6c25bbb667de6ac0e6511a126592e62dac7e4888 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/natural_number_game | c7c00aa1f6a95004286fd456ed13cf6e113159ce | 9d09925424da9f6275e6cfe427c8bcf12bb0944f | refs/heads/master | 1,600,715,773,528 | 1,573,910,462,000 | 1,573,910,462,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,114 | lean | import mynat.mul -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/-
# Tutorial world
## level 2: The rewrite (`rw`) tactic.
The rewrite tactic is the way to "substitute in" the value
of a variable. In general, if you have a hypothesis of the form `A = B`, and your
goal mentions the left hand side `A` somewhere, then
the `rewrite` tactic will replace the `A` in your goal with a `B`.
Below is a theorem which cannot be
proved using `refl` -- you need a rewrite first.
Delete the sorry and take a look in the top right box at what we have.
The variables $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers, and we have
a proof `h` that $y = x + 7$. Our goal
is to prove that $2y=2(x+7)$. This goal is obvious -- we just
substitute in $y = x+7$ and we're done. In Lean, we do
this substitution using the `rw` tactic. So start your proof with
`rw h,`
and then hit enter. **Don't forget the comma.**
Did you see what happened to the goal? The goal doesn't close,
but it *changes* from `⊢ 2 * y = 2 * (x + 7)` to `⊢ 2 * (x + 7) = 2 * (x + 7)`.
We can just close this goal with
`refl,`
by writing it on the line after `rw h,`. Don't forget the comma, hit
enter, and enjoy seeing the "Proof complete!" message in the
top right window. The other reason you'll know you're
done is that the bottom right window (the error window)
becomes empty. When you've finished reading the comments below
the proof, click "Next Level" in the top right to proceed to the next
level in this world.
-/
/- Lemma : no-side-bar
If $x$ and $y$ are natural numbers,
and $y=x+7$, then $2y=2(x+7)$.
-/
lemma example2 (x y z : mynat) (h : y = x + 7) : 2 * y = 2 * (x + 7) :=
begin [less_leaky]
rw h,
refl
end
/- Tactic : rw
## Summary
If `h` is a proof of `X = Y`, then `rw h,` will change
all `X`s in the goal to `Y`s. Variants: `rw ← h` (changes
`Y` to `X`) and
`rw h at h2` (changes `X` to `Y` in hypothesis `h2` instead
of the goal).
## Details
The `rw` tactic is a way to do "substituting in". There
are two distinct situations where use this tactics.
1) If `h : A = B` is a hypothesis (i.e., a proof of `A = B`)
in your local context (the box in the top right)
and if your goal contains one or more `A`s, then `rw h`
will change them all to `B`'s.
2) The `rw` tactic will also work with proofs of theorems
which are equalities (look for them in the drop down
menu on the left, within Theorem Statements).
For example, in world 1 level 4
we learn about `add_zero x : x + 0 = x`, and `rw add_zero`
will change `x + 0` into `x` in your goal (or fail with
an error if Lean cannot find `x + 0` in the goal).
Important note: if `h` is not a proof of the form `A = B`
or `A ↔ B` (for example if `h` is a function, an implication,
or perhaps even a proposition itself rather than its proof),
then `rw` is not the tactic you want to use. For example,
`rw (P = Q)` is never correct: `P = Q` is the true-false
statement itself, not the proof.
If `h : P = Q` is its proof, then `rw h` will work.
Pro tip 1: If `h : A = B` and you want to change
`B`s to `A`s instead, try `rw ←h` (get the arrow with `\l`).
### Example:
If it looks like this in the top right hand box:
```
x y : mynat
h : x = z + z
⊢ succ (x + 0) = succ (z + z)
```
then
`rw add_zero,`
will change the goal into `⊢ succ x = succ (z + z)`, and then
`rw h,`
will change the goal into `⊢ succ (z + z) = succ (z + z)`, which
can be solved with `refl,`.
### Example:
You can use `rw` to change a hypothesis as well.
For example, if your local context looks like this:
```
x y : mynat
h1 : x = y + 3
h2 : 2 * y = x
⊢ y = 3
```
then `rw h1 at h2` will turn `h2` into `h2 : 2 * y = y + 3`.
-/
/-
## Exploring your proof.
Click on `refl,` and then use the arrow keys to move
your cursor around the proof. Go up and down and note that
the goal changes -- indeed you can inspect Lean's "state" at each
line of the proof (the hypotheses, and the goal).
Try to figure out the exact place where the goal changes.
The comma tells Lean "I've finished writing this tactic now,
please process it." Lean ignores newlines, but pays great
attention to commas.
-/
end mynat -- hide |
4f4b0888e92da268edd191afac804ff4f572f3b2 | 0d7f5899c0475f9e105a439896d9377f80c0d7c3 | /src/free_ralg.lean | ab845ef7611c158ca10bcd275e8a6d1e4d428892 | [] | no_license | adamtopaz/UnivAlg | 127038f320e68cdf3efcd0c084c9af02fdb8da3d | 2458d47a6e4fd0525e3a25b07cb7dd518ac173ef | refs/heads/master | 1,670,320,985,286 | 1,597,350,882,000 | 1,597,350,882,000 | 280,585,500 | 4 | 0 | null | 1,597,350,883,000 | 1,595,048,527,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 999 | lean | import .lang
import .ualg
namespace lang
universes v u
variables (L : lang.{v}) (S : Type u)
inductive free : Type (max v u)
| of : S → free
| op {n} : L n → (fin n → free) → free
namespace free
instance : has_app L (L.free S) :=
{ app := λ _, op }
def univ : S → L.free S := of
variable {S}
def lift {B : Type*} [has_app L B] (f : S → B) : L.free S →$[L] B :=
{ to_fn := λ t, free.rec_on t f (λ n t as bs, applyo t bs),
applyo_map' := by tauto }
theorem univ_comp_lift {B : Type*} [has_app L B] (f : S → B) : (lift L f) ∘ (univ L S) = f := rfl
theorem lift_unique {B : Type*} [has_app L B] (f : S → B) (g : L.free S →$[L] B) (hyp : g ∘ (univ L S) = f) : g = lift L f :=
begin
apply ralg_hom.ext,
ext,
induction x with _ _ t as ind,
{ change (g ∘ (univ _ _)) x = _,
rw hyp, refl },
{ change g (applyo t as) = (lift L f) (applyo t as),
simp_rw ←ralg_hom.applyo_map,
apply congr_arg,
ext,
apply ind }
end
end free
end lang |
2b875654904ce9415905dbe3554eeced417da0e4 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/special_functions/complex/circle.lean | 69c912ada342789a0b952fb3b5ef53ac23b73eba | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,158 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.complex.circle
import analysis.special_functions.complex.log
/-!
# Maps on the unit circle
In this file we prove some basic lemmas about `exp_map_circle` and the restriction of `complex.arg`
to the unit circle. These two maps define a local equivalence between `circle` and `ℝ`, see
`circle.arg_local_equiv` and `circle.arg_equiv`, that sends the whole circle to `(-π, π]`.
-/
open complex function set
open_locale real
namespace circle
lemma injective_arg : injective (λ z : circle, arg z) :=
λ z w h, subtype.ext $ ext_abs_arg ((abs_coe_circle z).trans (abs_coe_circle w).symm) h
@[simp] lemma arg_eq_arg {z w : circle} : arg z = arg w ↔ z = w := injective_arg.eq_iff
end circle
lemma arg_exp_map_circle {x : ℝ} (h₁ : -π < x) (h₂ : x ≤ π) : arg (exp_map_circle x) = x :=
by rw [exp_map_circle_apply, exp_mul_I, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I ⟨h₁, h₂⟩]
@[simp] lemma exp_map_circle_arg (z : circle) : exp_map_circle (arg z) = z :=
circle.injective_arg $ arg_exp_map_circle (neg_pi_lt_arg _) (arg_le_pi _)
namespace circle
/-- `complex.arg ∘ coe` and `exp_map_circle` define a local equivalence between `circle and `ℝ` with
`source = set.univ` and `target = set.Ioc (-π) π`. -/
@[simps { fully_applied := ff }]
noncomputable def arg_local_equiv : local_equiv circle ℝ :=
{ to_fun := arg ∘ coe,
inv_fun := exp_map_circle,
source := univ,
target := Ioc (-π) π,
map_source' := λ z _, ⟨neg_pi_lt_arg _, arg_le_pi _⟩,
map_target' := maps_to_univ _ _,
left_inv' := λ z _, exp_map_circle_arg z,
right_inv' := λ x hx, arg_exp_map_circle hx.1 hx.2 }
/-- `complex.arg` and `exp_map_circle` define an equivalence between `circle and `(-π, π]`. -/
@[simps { fully_applied := ff }]
noncomputable def arg_equiv : circle ≃ Ioc (-π) π :=
{ to_fun := λ z, ⟨arg z, neg_pi_lt_arg _, arg_le_pi _⟩,
inv_fun := exp_map_circle ∘ coe,
left_inv := λ z, arg_local_equiv.left_inv trivial,
right_inv := λ x, subtype.ext $ arg_local_equiv.right_inv x.2 }
end circle
lemma left_inverse_exp_map_circle_arg : left_inverse exp_map_circle (arg ∘ coe) :=
exp_map_circle_arg
lemma inv_on_arg_exp_map_circle : inv_on (arg ∘ coe) exp_map_circle (Ioc (-π) π) univ :=
circle.arg_local_equiv.symm.inv_on
lemma surj_on_exp_map_circle_neg_pi_pi : surj_on exp_map_circle (Ioc (-π) π) univ :=
circle.arg_local_equiv.symm.surj_on
lemma exp_map_circle_eq_exp_map_circle {x y : ℝ} :
exp_map_circle x = exp_map_circle y ↔ ∃ m : ℤ, x = y + m * (2 * π) :=
begin
rw [subtype.ext_iff, exp_map_circle_apply, exp_map_circle_apply, exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int],
refine exists_congr (λ n, _),
rw [← mul_assoc, ← add_mul, mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero, ← of_real_one, ← of_real_bit0,
← of_real_mul, ← of_real_int_cast, ← of_real_mul, ← of_real_add, of_real_inj]
end
lemma periodic_exp_map_circle : periodic exp_map_circle (2 * π) :=
λ z, exp_map_circle_eq_exp_map_circle.2 ⟨1, by rw [int.cast_one, one_mul]⟩
@[simp] lemma exp_map_circle_two_pi : exp_map_circle (2 * π) = 1 :=
periodic_exp_map_circle.eq.trans exp_map_circle_zero
lemma exp_map_circle_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : exp_map_circle (x - 2 * π) = exp_map_circle x :=
periodic_exp_map_circle.sub_eq x
lemma exp_map_circle_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : exp_map_circle (x + 2 * π) = exp_map_circle x :=
periodic_exp_map_circle x
/-- `exp_map_circle`, applied to a `real.angle`. -/
noncomputable def real.angle.exp_map_circle (θ : real.angle) : circle :=
periodic_exp_map_circle.lift θ
@[simp] lemma real.angle.exp_map_circle_coe (x : ℝ) :
real.angle.exp_map_circle x = exp_map_circle x :=
rfl
lemma real.angle.coe_exp_map_circle (θ : real.angle) : (θ.exp_map_circle : ℂ) = θ.cos + θ.sin * I :=
begin
induction θ using real.angle.induction_on,
simp [complex.exp_mul_I],
end
@[simp] lemma real.angle.exp_map_circle_zero :
real.angle.exp_map_circle 0 = 1 :=
by rw [←real.angle.coe_zero, real.angle.exp_map_circle_coe, exp_map_circle_zero]
@[simp] lemma real.angle.exp_map_circle_neg (θ : real.angle) :
real.angle.exp_map_circle (-θ) = (real.angle.exp_map_circle θ)⁻¹ :=
begin
induction θ using real.angle.induction_on,
simp_rw [←real.angle.coe_neg, real.angle.exp_map_circle_coe, exp_map_circle_neg]
end
@[simp] lemma real.angle.exp_map_circle_add (θ₁ θ₂ : real.angle) :
real.angle.exp_map_circle (θ₁ + θ₂) =
(real.angle.exp_map_circle θ₁) * (real.angle.exp_map_circle θ₂) :=
begin
induction θ₁ using real.angle.induction_on,
induction θ₂ using real.angle.induction_on,
exact exp_map_circle_add θ₁ θ₂
end
@[simp] lemma real.angle.arg_exp_map_circle (θ : real.angle) :
(arg (real.angle.exp_map_circle θ) : real.angle) = θ :=
begin
induction θ using real.angle.induction_on,
rw [real.angle.exp_map_circle_coe, exp_map_circle_apply, exp_mul_I, ←of_real_cos,
←of_real_sin, ←real.angle.cos_coe, ←real.angle.sin_coe, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle]
end
|
9fd6948b913c81ef502664a57b770923dfe0621c | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/data/list/basic.lean | 3a0f7d70ace6e9c071dd9ce0044b91501b2326f7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 192,297 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.order_functions
import control.monad.basic
import data.nat.choose.basic
import order.rel_classes
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
attribute [inline] list.head
instance : is_left_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ nil_append ⟩
instance : is_right_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ append_nil ⟩
instance : is_associative (list α) has_append.append :=
⟨ append_assoc ⟩
theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem cons_ne_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ l :=
mt (congr_arg length) (nat.succ_ne_self _)
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
theorem cons_inj (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
cons_injective.eq_iff
theorem exists_cons_of_ne_nil {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) : ∃ b L, l = b :: L :=
by { induction l with c l', contradiction, use [c,l'], }
/-! ### mem -/
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, or.inl⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
classical.by_cases or.inl $ assume : a ≠ b, h.elim or.inl $ assume h, or.inr ⟨this, h⟩
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {cases h}, rcases h with rfl | h,
{ exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{cases h},
{rcases h with rfl | h,
{exact or.inl rfl},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) :
∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{cases h},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{exact ⟨c, mem_cons_self _ _, h.symm⟩},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, mem_cons_of_mem _ ha₁, ha₂⟩ }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
lemma forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ l.map f, P i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ l, P (f j) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H j hj,
exact H (f j) (mem_map_of_mem f hj) },
{ assume H i hi,
rcases mem_map.1 hi with ⟨j, hj, ji⟩,
rw ← ji,
exact H j hj }
end
@[simp] lemma map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} : list.map f l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨by cases l; simp only [forall_prop_of_true, map, forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff],
λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp only [join, mem_append, @mem_join L, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right,
exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} :
b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [cons_bind, map_append, bind_map l]
/-! ### length -/
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_singleton (a : α) : length [a] = 1 := rfl
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_length_pos {l : list α} : 0 < length l → l ≠ [] :=
λ h1 h2, lt_irrefl 0 ((length_eq_zero.2 h2).subst h1)
theorem length_pos_of_ne_nil {l : list α} : l ≠ [] → 0 < length l :=
λ h, pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ λ h0, h $ length_eq_zero.1 h0
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma exists_of_length_succ {n} :
∀ l : list α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [] H := absurd H.symm $ succ_ne_zero n
| (h :: t) H := ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : injective (list.length : list α → ℕ) ↔ subsingleton α :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, refine ⟨λ x y, _⟩, suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, refl },
{ intros hα l1 l2 hl, induction l1 generalizing l2; cases l2,
{ refl }, { cases hl }, { cases hl },
congr, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _, apply l1_ih, simpa using hl }
end
@[simp] lemma length_injective [subsingleton α] : injective (length : list α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr $ by apply_instance
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
lemma empty_eq : (∅ : list α) = [] := by refl
lemma singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : list α) = [x] := rfl
lemma insert_neg [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∉ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
if_neg h
lemma insert_pos [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∈ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = l :=
if_pos h
lemma doubleton_eq [decidable_eq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : list α) = [x, y] :=
by { rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq], rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton] }
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem forall_mem_cons : ∀ {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α},
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
ball_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (mem_cons_self _ _) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (mem_cons_of_mem _ xl) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, left, exact px end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp only [subset_def, mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
@[simp] theorem append_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, simp only [subset_def] at *, split; intros; simp* },
{ rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩, apply append_subset_of_subset_of_subset h1 h2 }
end
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp only [mem_map, not_and, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (h : injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_subset f⟩, intros h2 x hx,
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩,
cases h hxx', exact hx'
end
/-! ### append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma singleton_append {x : α} {l : list α} : [x] ++ l = x :: l := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp only [nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, false_and]
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp only [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c, nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true,
true_and, false_and, exists_false, false_or, or_false, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left']
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { rw nil_append, split,
{ rintro rfl, left, exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨a', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', H, rfl⟩), {refl}, {rw [← append_assoc, ← H], refl} } },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp only [cons_append, nil_append, false_and, exists_false, false_or, exists_eq_left'],
exact eq_comm },
{ simp only [cons_append, @eq_comm _ a, ih, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left,
exists_and_distrib_left] } }
end
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp only [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs, take, drop]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := congr_arg (cons x) $ take_append_drop n xs
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj :
∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) :
s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp only [length_append] at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_right h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_left' h rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : list α) : function.injective (λ t, s ++ t) :=
λ t₁ t₂, append_left_cancel
theorem append_right_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_right_injective s).eq_iff
theorem append_left_injective (t : list α) : function.injective (λ s, s ++ t) :=
λ s₁ s₂, append_right_cancel
theorem append_left_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_left_injective t).eq_iff
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
/-! ### repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ b = a
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := by simp [mem_repeat]
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} {n} (h : b ∈ repeat a n) : b = a :=
(mem_repeat.1 h).2
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H := by cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂;
unfold length repeat; congr; [exact H₁, exact eq_repeat_of_mem H₂]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp only [*, zero_add, succ_add, repeat]; split; refl
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem join_repeat_nil (n : ℕ) : join (repeat [] n) = @nil α :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, join, append_nil]]
lemma repeat_left_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
function.injective (λ a : α, repeat a n) :=
λ a b h, (eq_repeat.1 h).2 _ $ mem_repeat.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
lemma repeat_left_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
repeat a n = repeat b n ↔ a = b :=
(repeat_left_injective hn).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma repeat_left_inj' {a b : α} :
∀ {n}, repeat a n = repeat b n ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := (repeat_left_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans $ by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
lemma repeat_right_injective (a : α) : function.injective (repeat a) :=
function.left_inverse.injective (length_repeat a)
@[simp] lemma repeat_right_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} :
repeat a n = repeat a m ↔ n = m :=
(repeat_right_injective a).eq_iff
/-! ### pure -/
@[simp] theorem mem_pure {α} (x y : α) :
x ∈ (pure y : list α) ↔ x = y := by simp! [pure,list.ret]
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
-- TODO: duplicate of a lemma in core
theorem bind_append (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
append_bind _ _ _
@[simp] theorem bind_singleton (f : α → list β) (x : α) : [x].bind f = f x :=
append_nil (f x)
/-! ### concat -/
theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp only [*, concat]; split; refl
theorem init_eq_of_concat_eq {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : concat l₁ a = concat l₂ a → l₁ = l₂ :=
begin
intro h,
rw [concat_eq_append, concat_eq_append] at h,
exact append_right_cancel h
end
theorem last_eq_of_concat_eq {a b : α} {l : list α} : concat l a = concat l b → a = b :=
begin
intro h,
rw [concat_eq_append, concat_eq_append] at h,
exact head_eq_of_cons_eq (append_left_cancel h)
end
theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by simp
theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by simp
theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, length_append, length]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by simp
/-! ### reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, cons_append]],
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, reverse_cons, append_assoc]];
refl
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; [rw [nil_append, reverse_nil, append_nil],
simp only [*, cons_append, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]
theorem reverse_concat (l : list α) (a : α) : reverse (concat l a) = a :: reverse l :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, reverse_append, reverse_singleton, singleton_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, reverse_append]]; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_involutive : involutive (@reverse α) :=
λ l, reverse_reverse l
@[simp] theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, length_append, length]]
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map, reverse_cons, map_append]]
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [reverse_core_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, mem_cons_iff,
not_mem_nil, false_or, or_false, or_comm]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp only [length_reverse, length_repeat],
λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
/-! ### is_nil -/
lemma is_nil_iff_eq_nil {l : list α} : l.is_nil ↔ l = [] :=
list.cases_on l (by simp [is_nil]) (by simp [is_nil])
/-! ### init -/
@[simp] theorem length_init : ∀ (l : list α), length (init l) = length l - 1
| [] := rfl
| [a] := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) :=
begin
rw init,
simp only [add_left_inj, length, succ_add_sub_one],
exact length_init (b :: l)
end
/-! ### last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l;
[refl, simp only [cons_append, last_cons _ (λ H, cons_ne_nil _ _ (append_eq_nil.1 H).2), *]]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, last_append]
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem init_append_last : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), init l ++ [last l h] = l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := rfl
| (a::b::l) h :=
begin
rw [init, cons_append, last_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _) (cons_ne_nil _ _)],
congr,
exact init_append_last (cons_ne_nil b l)
end
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
theorem last_mem : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), last l h ∈ l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := or.inl rfl
| (a::b::l) h := or.inr $ by { rw [last_cons_cons], exact last_mem (cons_ne_nil b l) }
lemma last_repeat_succ (a m : ℕ) :
(repeat a m.succ).last (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ
(show (repeat a m.succ).length = m.succ, by rw length_repeat)) = a :=
begin
induction m with k IH,
{ simp },
{ simpa only [repeat_succ, last] }
end
/-! ### last' -/
@[simp] theorem last'_is_none :
∀ {l : list α}, (last' l).is_none ↔ l = []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_none (b::l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_is_some : ∀ {l : list α}, l.last'.is_some ↔ l ≠ []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_some (b::l)]
theorem mem_last'_eq_last : ∀ {l : list α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.last' → ∃ h, x = last l h
| [] x hx := false.elim $ by simpa using hx
| [a] x hx := have a = x, by simpa using hx, this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| (a::b::l) x hx :=
begin
rw last' at hx,
rcases mem_last'_eq_last hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
use cons_ne_nil _ _,
rwa [last_cons]
end
theorem mem_of_mem_last' {l : list α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.last') : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_last'_eq_last ha in h₂.symm ▸ last_mem _
theorem init_append_last' : ∀ {l : list α} (a ∈ l.last'), init l ++ [a] = l
| [] a ha := (option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a] _ rfl := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) c hc := by { rw [last'] at hc, rw [init, cons_append, init_append_last' _ hc] }
theorem ilast_eq_last' [inhabited α] : ∀ l : list α, l.ilast = l.last'.iget
| [] := by simp [ilast, arbitrary]
| [a] := rfl
| [a, b] := rfl
| [a, b, c] := rfl
| (a :: b :: c :: l) := by simp [ilast, ilast_eq_last' (c :: l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_append_cons : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (a : α) (l₂ : list α),
last' (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = last' (a :: l₂)
| [] a l₂ := rfl
| [b] a l₂ := rfl
| (b::c::l₁) a l₂ := by rw [cons_append, cons_append, last', ← cons_append, last'_append_cons]
theorem last'_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : list α) : ∀ {l₂ : list α} (hl₂ : l₂ ≠ []),
last' (l₁ ++ l₂) = last' l₂
| [] hl₂ := by contradiction
| (b::l₂) _ := last'_append_cons l₁ b l₂
/-! ### head(') and tail -/
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
theorem mem_of_mem_head' {x : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, x ∈ l.head' → x ∈ l
| [] h := (option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| (a::l) h := by { simp only [head', option.mem_def] at h, exact h ▸ or.inl rfl }
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, refl}
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] :=
by { induction l, contradiction, rw [tail,cons_append,tail], }
theorem cons_head'_tail : ∀ {l : list α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ head' l), a :: tail l = l
| [] a h := by contradiction
| (b::l) a h := by { simp at h, simp [h] }
theorem head_mem_head' [inhabited α] : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), head l ∈ head' l
| [] h := by contradiction
| (a::l) h := rfl
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
cons_head'_tail (head_mem_head' h)
@[simp] theorem head'_map (f : α → β) (l) : head' (map f l) = (head' l).map f := by cases l; refl
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ rw reverse_cons, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
def bidirectional_rec {C : list α → Sort*}
(H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ (a : α), C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : ∀ l, C l
| [] := H0
| [a] := H1 a
| (a :: b :: l) :=
let l' := init (b :: l), b' := last (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) in
have length l' < length (a :: b :: l), by { change _ < length l + 2, simp },
begin
rw ←init_append_last (cons_ne_nil b l),
have : C l', from bidirectional_rec l',
exact Hn a l' b' ‹C l'›
end
using_well_founded { rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf list.length⟩] }
/-- Like `bidirectional_rec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def bidirectional_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ (a : α), C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectional_rec H0 H1 Hn l
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem sublist.append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) :
l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h, { left, exact ‹l <+ l₂› }, { right, apply mem_cons_self } },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem sublist.reverse {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih, {refl},
{ rw reverse_cons, exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left ih },
{ rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons], exact ih.append_right [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist_iff]
using h.reverse,
λ h, h.append_right l⟩
theorem sublist.append {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α}
(hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem sublist.subset : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ s.subset
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_repeat] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/-! ### index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _) },
simp only [length, mem_cons_iff, index_of_cons], split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) (λ H, H $ or.inl h) },
{ simp only [h, false_or], rw ← ih, exact succ_inj' }
end
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {refl},
simp only [length, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b, {rw if_pos h, exact nat.zero_le _},
rw if_neg h, exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/-! ### nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_len_le : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, length l ≤ n → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_len_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_len_le hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
@[simp]
theorem nth_eq_none_iff : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, nth l n = none ↔ length l ≤ n :=
begin
intros, split,
{ intro h, by_contradiction h',
have h₂ : ∃ h, l.nth_le n h = l.nth_le n (lt_of_not_ge h') := ⟨lt_of_not_ge h', rfl⟩,
rw [← nth_eq_some, h] at h₂, cases h₂ },
{ solve_by_elim [nth_len_le] },
end
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
lemma nth_zero (l : list α) : l.nth 0 = l.head' := by cases l; refl
lemma nth_injective {α : Type u} {xs : list α} {i j : ℕ}
(h₀ : i < xs.length)
(h₁ : nodup xs)
(h₂ : xs.nth i = xs.nth j) : i = j :=
begin
induction xs with x xs generalizing i j,
{ cases h₀ },
{ cases i; cases j,
case nat.zero nat.zero
{ refl },
case nat.succ nat.succ
{ congr, cases h₁,
apply xs_ih;
solve_by_elim [lt_of_succ_lt_succ] },
iterate 2
{ dsimp at h₂,
cases h₁ with _ _ h h',
cases h x _ rfl,
rw mem_iff_nth,
exact ⟨_, h₂.symm⟩ <|>
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩ } },
end
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
/-- A version of `nth_le_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem nth_le_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nth_le l n H) = nth_le (map f l) n ((length_map f l).symm ▸ H) :=
(nth_le_map f _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
/-- If one has `nth_le L i hi` in a formula and `h : L = L'`, one can not `rw h` in the formula as
`hi` gives `i < L.length` and not `i < L'.length`. The lemma `nth_le_of_eq` can be used to make
such a rewrite, with `rw (nth_le_of_eq h)`. -/
lemma nth_le_of_eq {L L' : list α} (h : L = L') {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le L' i (h ▸ hi) :=
by { congr, exact h}
@[simp] lemma nth_le_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) :
nth_le [a] n hn = a :=
have hn0 : n = 0 := le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_lt_succ hn),
by subst hn0; refl
lemma nth_le_zero [inhabited α] {L : list α} (h : 0 < L.length) :
L.nth_le 0 h = L.head :=
by { cases L, cases h, simp, }
lemma nth_le_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn₁) (hn₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n hn₁ = l₁.nth_le n hn₂
| [] _ n hn₁ hn₂ := (not_lt_zero _ hn₂).elim
| (a::l) _ 0 hn₁ hn₂ := rfl
| (a::l) _ (n+1) hn₁ hn₂ := by simp only [nth_le, cons_append];
exact nth_le_append _ _
lemma nth_le_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}
(h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂ : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length) : n - l₁.length < l₂.length :=
begin
rw list.length_append at h₂,
convert (nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff h₁).mpr h₂,
simp,
end
lemma nth_le_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n h₂ = l₂.nth_le (n - l₁.length) (nth_le_append_right_aux h₁ h₂)
| [] _ n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) _ (n+1) h₁ h₂ :=
begin
dsimp,
conv { to_rhs, congr, skip, rw [←nat.sub_sub, nat.sub.right_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel], },
rw nth_le_append_right (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₁),
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_repeat (a : α) {n m : ℕ} (h : m < (list.repeat a n).length) :
(list.repeat a n).nth_le m h = a :=
eq_of_mem_repeat (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma nth_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₁.nth n :=
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := lt_of_lt_of_le hn
(by rw length_append; exact le_add_right _ _),
by rw [nth_le_nth hn, nth_le_nth hn', nth_le_append]
lemma nth_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : l₁.length ≤ n) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₂.nth (n - l₁.length) :=
begin
by_cases hl : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length,
{ rw [nth_le_nth hl, nth_le_nth, nth_le_append_right hn] },
{ rw [nth_len_le (le_of_not_lt hl), nth_len_le],
rw [not_lt, length_append] at hl,
exact nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le hl }
end
lemma last_eq_nth_le : ∀ (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []),
last l h = l.nth_le (l.length - 1) (sub_lt (length_pos_of_ne_nil h) one_pos)
| [] h := rfl
| [a] h := by rw [last_singleton, nth_le_singleton]
| (a :: b :: l) h := by { rw [last_cons, last_eq_nth_le (b :: l)],
refl, exact cons_ne_nil b l }
@[simp] lemma nth_concat_length : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).nth l.length = some a
| [] a := rfl
| (b::l) a := by rw [cons_append, length_cons, nth, nth_concat_length]
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa;
simp only [aa, ext (λn, h (n+1))]; split; refl
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by { rw [nth_len_le h₁, nth_len_le], rwa [←hl], }
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} :
∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b;
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, index_of_cons, nth_le, @index_of_nth_le l]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 :
∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i :=
by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, from add_right_comm i (length l) 1);
exact λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
lemma index_of_inj [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) : index_of x l = index_of y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, have nth_le l (index_of x l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hx) =
nth_le l (index_of y l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hy),
by simp only [h],
by simpa only [index_of_nth_le],
λ h, by subst h⟩
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
lemma eq_cons_of_length_one {l : list α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nth_le 0 (h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)] :=
begin
refine ext_le (by convert h) (λ n h₁ h₂, _),
simp only [nth_le_singleton],
congr,
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₂)
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail {f g : list α → list α} (m : ℕ) :
∀n (l:list α), (l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g (m + n) =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g m) n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail n l)
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le
{f g : list α → list α} (m n : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g m =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g (m - n)) n :=
begin
rcases le_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail]
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same {f g : list α → list α} (n : ℕ) (l:list α) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g n = l.modify_nth_tail (g ∘ f) n :=
by rw [modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le n n l (le_refl n), nat.sub_self]; refl
lemma modify_nth_tail_id :
∀n (l:list α), l.modify_nth_tail id n = l
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_id n l)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m;
simp only [h, if_pos, if_true, if_false, option.map_none, option.map_some, mt succ.inj,
not_false_iff]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_length]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_eq]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_ne _ _ h]
@[simp] lemma update_nth_nil (n : ℕ) (a : α) : [].update_nth n a = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma update_nth_succ (x : α) (xs : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(x :: xs).update_nth n.succ a = x :: xs.update_nth n a := rfl
lemma update_nth_comm (a b : α) : Π {n m : ℕ} (l : list α) (h : n ≠ m),
(l.update_nth n a).update_nth m b = (l.update_nth m b).update_nth n a
| _ _ [] _ := by simp
| 0 0 (x :: t) h := absurd rfl h
| (n + 1) 0 (x :: t) h := by simp [list.update_nth]
| 0 (m + 1) (x :: t) h := by simp [list.update_nth]
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (x :: t) h := by { simp only [update_nth, true_and, eq_self_iff_true],
exact update_nth_comm t (λ h', h $ nat.succ_inj'.mpr h'), }
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_eq (l : list α) (i : ℕ) (a : α)
(h : i < (l.update_nth i a).length) : (l.update_nth i a).nth_le i h = a :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← nth_le_nth, nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth]; simp * at *
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_of_ne {l : list α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.update_nth i a).length) :
(l.update_nth i a).nth_le j hj = l.nth_le j (by simpa using hj) :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, list.nth_update_nth_ne _ _ h, list.nth_le_nth]
lemma mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ l.update_nth n b), a ∈ l ∨ a = b
| [] n a b h := false.elim h
| (c::l) 0 a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
or.inr (or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _)
| (c::l) (n+1) a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
(λ h, h ▸ or.inl (mem_cons_self _ _))
(λ h, (mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth h).elim
(or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _) or.inr)
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_nil (a : α) : insert_nth 0 a [] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_succ_nil (n : ℕ) (a : α) : insert_nth (n + 1) a [] = [] := rfl
lemma length_insert_nth : ∀n as, n ≤ length as → length (insert_nth n a as) = length as + 1
| 0 as h := rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := congr_arg nat.succ $ length_insert_nth n as (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth (n:ℕ) (l : list α) : (l.insert_nth n a).remove_nth n = l :=
by rw [remove_nth_eq_nth_tail, insert_nth, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same];
from modify_nth_tail_id _ _
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge : ∀n m as, n < length as → n ≤ m →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth (m + 1) a).remove_nth n
| 0 0 [] has _ := (lt_irrefl _ has).elim
| 0 0 (a::as) has hmn := by simp [remove_nth, insert_nth]
| 0 (m+1) (a::as) has hmn := rfl
| (n+1) (m+1) (a::as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≤ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth m a).remove_nth (n + 1)
| n 0 (a :: as) has hmn := rfl
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (a :: as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) :
∀(i j : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≤ length l),
(l.insert_nth i a).insert_nth (j + 1) b = (l.insert_nth j b).insert_nth i a
| 0 j l := by simp [insert_nth]
| (i + 1) 0 l := assume h, (nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
| (i + 1) (j+1) [] := by simp
| (i + 1) (j+1) (c::l) :=
assume h₀ h₁,
by simp [insert_nth];
exact insert_nth_comm i j l (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₁)
lemma mem_insert_nth {a b : α} : ∀ {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (hi : n ≤ l.length),
a ∈ l.insert_nth n b ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l
| 0 as h := iff.rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := begin
dsimp [list.insert_nth],
erw [list.mem_cons_iff, mem_insert_nth (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h), list.mem_cons_iff,
← or.assoc, or_comm (a = a'), or.assoc]
end
end insert_nth
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] lemma map_nil (f : α → β) : map f [] = [] := rfl
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
map f l = foldr (λ a bs, f a :: bs) [] l :=
by induction l; simp *
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h in
by rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
lemma map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : list α} : map f l = map g l ↔ (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_congr⟩, intros h x hx,
rw [mem_iff_nth_le] at hx, rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩,
rw [nth_le_map_rev f, nth_le_map_rev g], congr, exact h
end
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]; split; refl
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero $ by rw [← length_map f l, h]; refl
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by unfold list.bind; induction l; simp only [map, join, list.ret, cons_append, nil_append, *];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) : f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : injective (map f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
split; intros h x y hxy,
{ suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, simp [hxy] },
{ induction y generalizing x, simpa using hxy,
cases x, simpa using hxy, simp at hxy, simp [y_ih hxy.2, h hxy.1] }
end
/--
A single `list.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `list.map` with another `list.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `list.map_map`.
-/
lemma comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : list α) :
map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) := (map_map _ _ _).symm
/--
Composing a `list.map` with another `list.map` is equal to
a single `list.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp] lemma map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) :
map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) :=
by { ext l, rw comp_map }
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (as : list α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (λ a bs, if p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as :=
by { induction as, { refl }, { simp! [*, apply_ite (map f)] } }
lemma last_map (f : α → β) {l : list α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).last (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.last hl) :=
begin
induction l with l_ih l_tl l_ih,
{ apply (hl rfl).elim },
{ cases l_tl,
{ simp },
{ simpa using l_ih } }
end
/-! ### map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_flip (f : α → β → γ) :
∀ as bs, map₂ (flip f) bs as = map₂ f as bs
| [] [] := rfl
| [] (b :: bs) := rfl
| (a :: as) [] := rfl
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) := by { simp! [map₂_flip], refl }
/-! ### take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero (l : list α) : take 0 l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_length : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_length end
theorem take_all_of_le : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, length l ≤ n → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by rw [zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp only [take_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp only [take, min_succ_succ, take_take n m l]; split; refl
theorem take_repeat (a : α) : ∀ (n m : ℕ), take n (repeat a m) = repeat a (min n m)
| n 0 := by simp
| 0 m := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_repeat]
lemma map_take {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).map f = (L.map f).take i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_take], }
lemma take_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ},
n ≤ l₁.length → (l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [list.take, list.cons_append, list.take, take_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Taking the first `l₁.length + i` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first
`i` elements of `l₂` to `l₁`. -/
lemma take_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
take (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ (take i l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, take_cons, l₁_ih, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
end
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_take (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le (L.take j) i (by { rw length_take, exact lt_min hj hi }) :=
by { rw nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm hi, exact nth_le_append _ _ }
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_take' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < (L.take j).length) :
nth_le (L.take j) i hi = nth_le L i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi (by simp [le_refl])) :=
by { simp at hi, rw nth_le_take L _ hi.1 }
lemma nth_take {l : list α} {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) :
(l.take n).nth m = l.nth m :=
begin
induction n with n hn generalizing l m,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero] at h,
exact absurd h (not_lt_of_le m.zero_le) },
{ cases l with hd tl,
{ simp only [take_nil] },
{ cases m,
{ simp only [nth, take] },
{ simpa only using hn (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) } } },
end
@[simp] lemma nth_take_of_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
(l.take (n + 1)).nth n = l.nth n :=
nth_take (nat.lt_succ_self n)
lemma take_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
l.take (n + 1) = l.take n ++ (l.nth n).to_list :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp only [option.to_list, nth, take_nil, append_nil]},
{ cases n,
{ simp only [option.to_list, nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, take, nil_append] },
{ simp only [hl, cons_append, nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, take] } }
end
@[simp] lemma take_eq_nil_iff {l : list α} {k : ℕ} :
l.take k = [] ↔ l = [] ∨ k = 0 :=
by { cases l; cases k; simp [nat.succ_ne_zero] }
lemma init_eq_take (l : list α) : l.init = l.take l.length.pred :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ simp [init] },
{ induction l with hd tl hl generalizing x,
{ simp [init], },
{ simp [init, hl] } }
end
lemma init_take {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.take n).init = l.take n.pred :=
by simp [init_eq_take, min_eq_left_of_lt h, take_take, pred_le]
@[simp] lemma drop_eq_nil_of_le {l : list α} {k : ℕ} (h : l.length ≤ k) :
l.drop k = [] :=
by simpa [←length_eq_zero] using nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h
lemma drop_eq_nil_iff_le {l : list α} {k : ℕ} :
l.drop k = [] ↔ l.length ≤ k :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, drop_eq_nil_of_le⟩,
induction k with k hk generalizing l,
{ simp only [drop] at h,
simp [h] },
{ cases l,
{ simp },
{ simp only [drop] at h,
simpa [nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using hk h } }
end
lemma tail_drop (l : list α) (n : ℕ) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simp [hl] } }
end
lemma cons_nth_le_drop_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l.length) :
l.nth_le n hn :: l.drop (n + 1) = l.drop n :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ exact absurd n.zero_le (not_le_of_lt (by simpa using hn)) },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simp only [nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, list.length] at hn,
simpa [list.nth_le, list.drop] using hl hn } }
end
theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α) :=
λ _, drop_eq_nil_of_le (nat.zero_le _)
lemma mem_of_mem_drop {α} {n : ℕ} {l : list α} {x : α}
(h : x ∈ l.drop n) :
x ∈ l :=
begin
induction l generalizing n,
case list.nil : n h
{ simpa using h },
case list.cons : l_hd l_tl l_ih n h
{ cases n; simp only [mem_cons_iff, drop] at h ⊢,
{ exact h },
right, apply l_ih h },
end
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
@[simp] lemma drop_length (l : list α) : l.drop l.length = [] :=
calc l.drop l.length = (l ++ []).drop l.length : by simp
... = [] : drop_left _ _
lemma drop_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l₁.length →
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [drop, cons_append, drop, drop_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Dropping the elements up to `l₁.length + i` in `l₁ + l₂` is the same as dropping the elements
up to `i` in `l₂`. -/
lemma drop_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
drop (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop i l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, drop, l₁_ih]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : i + j < L.length) :
nth_le L (i + j) h = nth_le (L.drop i) j
begin
have A : i < L.length := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h,
rw (take_append_drop i L).symm at h,
simpa only [le_of_lt A, min_eq_left, add_lt_add_iff_left, length_take, length_append] using h
end :=
begin
have A : length (take i L) = i, by simp [le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h)],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, nth_le_append_right];
simp [A]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : j < (L.drop i).length) :
nth_le (L.drop i) j h = nth_le L (i + j) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left ((length_drop i L) ▸ h)) :=
by rw nth_le_drop
lemma nth_drop (L : list α) (i j : ℕ) :
nth (L.drop i) j = nth L (i + j) :=
begin
ext,
simp only [nth_eq_some, nth_le_drop', option.mem_def],
split;
exact λ ⟨h, ha⟩, ⟨by simpa [nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt] using h, ha⟩
end
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : ℕ) : ∀ (m) (l : list α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m [] := by simp
| 0 l := by simp
| (m+1) (a::l) :=
calc drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) : rfl
... = drop (n + m) l : drop_drop m l
... = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) : rfl
theorem drop_take : ∀ (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list α),
drop m (take (m + n) l) = take n (drop m l)
| 0 n _ := by simp
| (m+1) n nil := by simp
| (m+1) n (_::l) :=
have h: m + 1 + n = (m+n) + 1, by ac_refl,
by simpa [take_cons, h] using drop_take m n l
lemma map_drop {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.drop i).map f = (L.map f).drop i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_drop], }
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
lemma reverse_take {α} {xs : list α} (n : ℕ)
(h : n ≤ xs.length) :
xs.reverse.take n = (xs.drop (xs.length - n)).reverse :=
begin
induction xs generalizing n;
simp only [reverse_cons, drop, reverse_nil, nat.zero_sub, length, take_nil],
cases decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le h with h' h',
{ replace h' := le_of_succ_le_succ h',
rwa [take_append_of_le_length, xs_ih _ h'],
rw [show xs_tl.length + 1 - n = succ (xs_tl.length - n), from _, drop],
{ rwa [succ_eq_add_one, nat.sub_add_comm] },
{ rwa length_reverse } },
{ subst h', rw [length, nat.sub_self, drop],
suffices : xs_tl.length + 1 = (xs_tl.reverse ++ [xs_hd]).length,
by rw [this, take_length, reverse_cons],
rw [length_append, length_reverse], refl }
end
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp only [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih generalizing a, {refl},
unfold foldl,
rw [ih (λ a b bin, H a b $ mem_cons_of_mem _ bin), H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
end
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih, {refl},
simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at H,
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
end
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldl_append (f a b) l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldr_cons, foldr_append b l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join (foldl f a l) L]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join a L, foldr_cons]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, foldr]]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp only [foldr_cons, foldr_eta l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_foldl {l : list α} : reverse (foldl (λ t h, h :: t) [] l) = l :=
by rw ←foldr_reverse; simp
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldl]]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldr]]
theorem foldl_map' {α β: Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β)
(a : α) (l : list α) (h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
list.foldl f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (list.foldl f a l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ simp }, { simp [l_ih, h] }
end
theorem foldr_map' {α β: Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β)
(a : α) (l : list α) (h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
list.foldr f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (list.foldr f a l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ simp }, { simp [l_ih, h] }
end
theorem foldl_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : α → γ → α) (op' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (op a x) = op' (f a) x) : foldl op' (f a) l = f (foldl op a l) :=
eq.symm $ by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldl]] }
theorem foldr_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : γ → α → α) (op' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (op x a) = op' x (f a)) : foldr op' (f a) l = f (foldr op a l) :=
by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldr]] }
lemma injective_foldl_comp {α : Type*} {l : list (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, function.injective f) (hf : function.injective f):
function.injective (@list.foldl (α → α) (α → α) function.comp f l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing f,
{ exact hf },
{ apply l_ih (λ _ h, hl _ (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)),
apply function.injective.comp hf,
apply hl _ (list.mem_cons_self _ _) }
end
/- scanl -/
section scanl
variables {f : β → α → β} {b : β} {a : α} {l : list α}
lemma length_scanl :
∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a [] := rfl
| a (x :: l) := by erw [length_cons, length_cons, length_scanl]
@[simp] lemma scanl_nil (b : β) : scanl f b nil = [b] := rfl
@[simp] lemma scanl_cons :
scanl f b (a :: l) = [b] ++ scanl f (f b a) l :=
by simp only [scanl, eq_self_iff_true, singleton_append, and_self]
@[simp] lemma nth_zero_scanl : (scanl f b l).nth 0 = some b :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp only [nth, scanl_nil] },
{ simp only [nth, scanl_cons, singleton_append] }
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nth_le 0 h = b :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp only [nth_le, scanl_nil] },
{ simp only [nth_le, scanl_cons, singleton_append] }
end
lemma nth_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} :
(scanl f b l).nth (i + 1) = ((scanl f b l).nth i).bind (λ x, (l.nth i).map (λ y, f x y)) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing b i,
{ symmetry,
simp only [option.bind_eq_none', nth, forall_2_true_iff, not_false_iff, option.map_none',
scanl_nil, option.not_mem_none, forall_true_iff] },
{ simp only [nth, scanl_cons, singleton_append],
cases i,
{ simp only [option.map_some', nth_zero_scanl, nth, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [hl, nth] } }
end
lemma nth_le_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nth_le (i + 1) h =
f ((scanl f b l).nth_le i (nat.lt_of_succ_lt h))
(l.nth_le i (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l))))) :=
begin
induction i with i hi generalizing b l,
{ cases l,
{ simp only [length, zero_add, scanl_nil] at h,
exact absurd h (lt_irrefl 1) },
{ simp only [scanl_cons, singleton_append, nth_le_zero_scanl, nth_le] } },
{ cases l,
{ simp only [length, add_lt_iff_neg_right, scanl_nil] at h,
exact absurd h (not_lt_of_lt nat.succ_pos') },
{ simp_rw scanl_cons,
rw nth_le_append_right _,
{ simpa only [hi, length, succ_add_sub_one] },
{ simp only [length, nat.zero_le, le_add_iff_nonneg_left] } } }
end
end scanl
/- scanr -/
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux, t, foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux_cons, foldr_cons]; split; refl
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) :=
by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp only [foldl_cons];
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; refl
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → α}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldl,foldl,foldl,← foldl_eq_of_comm',foldl,hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a [] := rfl
| a (b :: l) := by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf,foldr,foldl_eq_foldr']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → β}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)
include hf
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b::l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldr,foldr,foldr,hf,← foldr_eq_of_comm']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc];
rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### mfoldl, mfoldr, mmap -/
section mfoldl_mfoldr
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_nil (f : β → α → m β) {b} : mfoldl f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_nil (f : α → β → m β) {b} : mfoldr f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_cons {f : β → α → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldl f b (a :: l) = f b a >>= λ b', mfoldl f b' l := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_cons {f : α → β → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldr f b (a :: l) = mfoldr f b l >>= f a := rfl
theorem mfoldr_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
mfoldr f b l = foldr (λ a mb, mb >>= f a) (pure b) l :=
by induction l; simp *
attribute [simp] mmap mmap'
variables [is_lawful_monad m]
theorem mfoldl_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
mfoldl f b l = foldl (λ mb a, mb >>= λ b, f b a) (pure b) l :=
begin
suffices h : ∀ (mb : m β),
(mb >>= λ b, mfoldl f b l) = foldl (λ mb a, mb >>= λ b, f b a) mb l,
by simp [←h (pure b)],
induction l; intro,
{ simp },
{ simp only [mfoldl, foldl, ←l_ih] with monad_norm }
end
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_append {f : β → α → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldl f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldl f b l₁ >>= λ x, mfoldl f x l₂
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldl_nil, pure_bind]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [cons_append, mfoldl_cons, mfoldl_append, bind_assoc]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_append {f : α → β → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldr f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldr f b l₂ >>= λ x, mfoldr f x l₁
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldr_nil, bind_pure]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [mfoldr_cons, cons_append, mfoldr_append, bind_assoc]
end mfoldl_mfoldr
/-! ### prod and sum -/
-- list.sum was already defined in defs.lean, but we couldn't tag it with `to_additive` yet.
attribute [to_additive] list.prod
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton : [a].prod = a := one_mul a
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
/-- If zero is an element of a list `L`, then `list.prod L = 0`. If the domain is a nontrivial
monoid with zero with no divisors, then this implication becomes an `iff`, see
`list.prod_eq_zero_iff`. -/
theorem prod_eq_zero {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] {L : list M₀} (h : (0 : M₀) ∈ L) :
L.prod = 0 :=
begin
induction L with a L ihL,
{ exact absurd h (not_mem_nil _) },
{ rw prod_cons,
cases (mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h with ha hL,
exacts [mul_eq_zero_of_left ha.symm _, mul_eq_zero_of_right _ (ihL hL)] }
end
/-- Product of elements of a list `L` equals zero if and only if `0 ∈ L`. See also
`list.prod_eq_zero` for an implication that needs weaker typeclass assumptions. -/
@[simp] theorem prod_eq_zero_iff {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] [nontrivial M₀]
[no_zero_divisors M₀] {L : list M₀} :
L.prod = 0 ↔ (0 : M₀) ∈ L :=
begin
induction L with a L ihL,
{ simp },
{ rw [prod_cons, mul_eq_zero, ihL, mem_cons_iff, eq_comm] }
end
theorem prod_ne_zero {M₀ : Type*} [monoid_with_zero M₀] [nontrivial M₀] [no_zero_divisors M₀]
{L : list M₀} (hL : (0 : M₀) ∉ L) : L.prod ≠ 0 :=
mt prod_eq_zero_iff.1 hL
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr : l.prod = foldr (*) 1 l :=
list.rec_on l rfl $ λ a l ihl, by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, ihl]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (l : list α) {r : β → γ → Prop}
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀⦃a b c⦄, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ a l hl, by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl])
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom [monoid β] (l : list α) (f : α →* β) :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod :=
by { simp only [prod, foldl_map, f.map_one.symm],
exact l.foldl_hom _ _ _ 1 f.map_mul }
-- `to_additive` chokes on the next few lemmas, so we do them by hand below
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_mul_prod_drop :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ, mul_assoc], }
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : list α) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
lemma prod_update_nth : ∀ (L : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α),
(L.update_nth n a).prod =
(L.take n).prod * (if n < L.length then a else 1) * (L.drop (n + 1)).prod
| (x::xs) 0 a := by simp [update_nth]
| (x::xs) (i+1) a := by simp [update_nth, prod_update_nth xs i a, mul_assoc]
| [] _ _ := by simp [update_nth, (nat.zero_le _).not_lt]
end monoid
section group
variables [group α]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv_rev` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg_rev`"]
lemma prod_inv_reverse : ∀ (L : list α), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).reverse.prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [prod_inv_reverse xs]
/-- A non-commutative variant of `list.prod_reverse` -/
@[to_additive "A non-commutative variant of `list.sum_reverse`"]
lemma prod_reverse_noncomm : ∀ (L : list α), L.reverse.prod = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod⁻¹ :=
by simp [prod_inv_reverse]
end group
section comm_group
variables [comm_group α]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg`"]
lemma prod_inv : ∀ (L : list α), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [mul_comm, prod_inv xs]
end comm_group
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_add_sum_drop [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).sum + (L.drop i).sum = L.sum
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, add_assoc, sum_take_add_sum_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_succ [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L.take i).sum + L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, sum_take_succ, add_assoc], }
lemma eq_of_sum_take_eq [add_left_cancel_monoid α] {L L' : list α} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).sum = (L'.take i).sum) : L = L' :=
begin
apply ext_le h (λ i h₁ h₂, _),
have : (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L'.take (i + 1)).sum := h' _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁),
rw [sum_take_succ L i h₁, sum_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this,
exact add_left_cancel this
end
lemma monotone_sum_take [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (L : list α) :
monotone (λ i, (L.take i).sum) :=
begin
apply monotone_of_monotone_nat (λ n, _),
by_cases h : n < L.length,
{ rw sum_take_succ _ _ h,
exact le_add_right (le_refl _) },
{ push_neg at h,
simp [take_all_of_le h, take_all_of_le (le_trans h (nat.le_succ _))] }
end
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le [ordered_comm_monoid α] {l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) :
1 ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih,
{ simp },
rw prod_cons,
exact one_le_mul (hl₁ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)) (ih (λ x h, hl₁ x (mem_cons_of_mem hd h))),
end
@[to_additive]
lemma single_le_prod [ordered_comm_monoid α] {l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) :
∀ x ∈ l, x ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
simp_rw [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at ⊢ hl₁,
split,
{ exact le_mul_of_one_le_right' (one_le_prod_of_one_le hl₁.2) },
{ exact λ x H, le_mul_of_one_le_of_le hl₁.1 (l_ih hl₁.right x H) },
end
@[to_additive all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero]
lemma all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one [ordered_comm_monoid α]
{l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) (hl₂ : l.prod = 1) :
∀ x ∈ l, x = (1 : α) :=
λ x hx, le_antisymm (hl₂ ▸ single_le_prod hl₁ _ hx) (hl₁ x hx)
lemma sum_eq_zero_iff [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (l : list α) :
l.sum = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, x = (0 : α) :=
⟨all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero (λ _ _, zero_le _),
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
{ intro h,
rw [sum_cons, add_eq_zero_iff],
rw forall_mem_cons at h,
exact ⟨h.1, l_ih h.2⟩ },
end⟩
/-- A list with sum not zero must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero [add_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : L.sum ≠ 0) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
/-- If all elements in a list are bounded below by `1`, then the length of the list is bounded
by the sum of the elements. -/
lemma length_le_sum_of_one_le (L : list ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ L, 1 ≤ i) : L.length ≤ L.sum :=
begin
induction L with j L IH h, { simp },
rw [sum_cons, length, add_comm],
exact add_le_add (h _ (set.mem_insert _ _)) (IH (λ i hi, h i (set.mem_union_right _ hi)))
end
-- Now we tie those lemmas back to their multiplicative versions.
attribute [to_additive] prod_take_mul_prod_drop prod_take_succ length_pos_of_prod_ne_one
/-- A list with positive sum must have positive length. -/
-- This is an easy consequence of `length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero`, but often useful in applications.
lemma length_pos_of_sum_pos [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : 0 < L.sum) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero L (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_erase [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] {a} :
Π {l : list α}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b::l) h :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h with rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
lemma dvd_prod [comm_monoid α] {a} {l : list α} (ha : a ∈ l) : a ∣ l.prod :=
let ⟨s, t, h⟩ := mem_split ha in
by rw [h, prod_append, prod_cons, mul_left_comm]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, a ∣ x) : a ∣ l.sum :=
begin
induction l with x l ih,
{ exact dvd_zero _ },
{ rw [list.sum_cons],
exact dvd_add (h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih (λ x hx, h x (mem_cons_of_mem _ hx))) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
lemma exists_lt_of_sum_lt [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum < (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x < g x :=
begin
induction l with x l,
{ exfalso, exact lt_irrefl _ h },
{ by_cases h' : f x < g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases l_ih _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩, refine ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_lt_of_le h $ add_le_add_right (le_of_not_gt h') _) }
end
lemma exists_le_of_sum_le [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(hl : l ≠ []) (f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum ≤ (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ contradiction },
{ by_cases h' : f x ≤ g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases exists_lt_of_sum_lt f g _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩,
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, le_of_lt h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_le_of_lt h $ add_lt_add_right (lt_of_not_ge h') _) }
end
-- Several lemmas about sum/head/tail for `list ℕ`.
-- These are hard to generalize well, as they rely on the fact that `default ℕ = 0`.
-- We'd like to state this as `L.head * L.tail.prod = L.prod`,
-- but because `L.head` relies on an inhabited instances and
-- returns a garbage value for the empty list, this is not possible.
-- Instead we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1`,
-- and below, restate the lemma just for `ℕ`.
@[to_additive]
lemma head_mul_tail_prod' [monoid α] (L : list α) :
(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1 * L.tail.prod = L.prod :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_add_tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_le_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head ≤ L.sum :=
nat.le.intro (head_add_tail_sum L)
lemma tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.tail.sum = L.sum - L.head :=
by rw [← head_add_tail_sum L, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel]
section
variables {G : Type*} [comm_group G]
attribute [to_additive] alternating_prod
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_nil :
alternating_prod ([] : list G) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_singleton (g : G) :
alternating_prod [g] = g := rfl
@[simp, to_additive alternating_sum_cons_cons']
lemma alternating_prod_cons_cons (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_prod (g :: h :: l) = g * h⁻¹ * alternating_prod l := rfl
lemma alternating_sum_cons_cons {G : Type*} [add_comm_group G] (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_sum (g :: h :: l) = g - h + alternating_sum l :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, alternating_sum]
end
/-! ### join -/
attribute [simp] join
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l::L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
lemma join_join (l : list (list (list α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join :=
by { induction l, simp, simp [l_ih] }
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma take_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.take i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [take_append, L_ih]
end
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma drop_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.drop i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [drop_append, L_ih],
end
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le (L : list α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i+1)).drop i = [nth_le L i hi] :=
begin
induction L generalizing i,
{ simp only [length] at hi, exact (nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim },
cases i, { simp },
have : i < L_tl.length,
{ simp at hi,
exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi },
simp [L_ih this],
refl
end
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lenghts of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le (L : list (list α)) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.join.take ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum).drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = nth_le L i hi :=
begin
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i+1)).map length).take i, by simp [map_take, take_take],
simp [take_sum_join, this, drop_sum_join, drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le _ hi]
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt1 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum :=
by simp [hi, sum_take_succ, hj]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt2 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < L.join.length :=
begin
convert lt_of_lt_of_le (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj) (monotone_sum_take _ hi),
have : L.length = (L.map length).length, by simp,
simp [this, -length_map]
end
/-- The `n`-th element in a join of sublists is the `j`-th element of the `i`th sublist,
where `n` can be obtained in terms of `i` and `j` by adding the lengths of all the sublists
of index `< i`, and adding `j`. -/
lemma nth_le_join (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
nth_le L.join (((L.map length).take i).sum + j) (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) =
nth_le (nth_le L i hi) j hj :=
by rw [nth_le_take L.join (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj),
nth_le_drop, nth_le_of_eq (drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le L hi)]
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : list (list α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by simp [H], _⟩,
rintros ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩,
apply ext_le,
{ have : length (map length L) = length (map length L'), by rw length_eq,
simpa using this },
{ assume n h₁ h₂,
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, join_eq, length_eq] }
end
/-! ### lexicographic ordering -/
/-- Given a strict order `<` on `α`, the lexicographic strict order on `list α`, for which
`[a0, ..., an] < [b0, ..., b_k]` if `a0 < b0` or `a0 = b0` and `[a1, ..., an] < [b1, ..., bk]`.
The definition is given for any relation `r`, not only strict orders. -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
@[simp] theorem not_nil_right (r : α → α → Prop) (l : list α) : ¬ lex r l [].
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
/-! ### all & any -/
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
simp only [all_cons, band_coe_iff, ih, forall_mem_cons]
end
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [all_iff_forall, bool.of_to_bool_iff]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_false bool.not_ff (not_exists_mem_nil _) },
simp only [any_cons, bor_coe_iff, ih, exists_mem_cons_iff]
end
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
@[priority 500] instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem [has_sizeof α] {x : α} {l : list α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
sizeof x < sizeof l :=
begin
induction l with h t ih; cases hx,
{ rw hx, exact lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg (lt_one_add _) (nat.zero_le _) },
{ exact lt_add_of_pos_of_le (zero_lt_one_add _) (le_of_lt (ih hx)) }
end
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl, rw [pmap, pmap, h, ih]]
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (g : ∀ b, p b → γ) (f : α → β)
(l H) : pmap g (map f l) H = pmap (λ a h, g (f a) h) l (λ a h, H _ (mem_map_of_mem _ h)) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, subtype.exists]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, length]]
@[simp] lemma length_attach (L : list α) : L.attach.length = L.length := length_pmap
@[simp] lemma pmap_eq_nil {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : pmap f l H = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by rw [← length_eq_zero, length_pmap, length_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma attach_eq_nil (l : list α) : l.attach = [] ↔ l = [] := pmap_eq_nil
lemma last_pmap {α β : Type*} (p : α → Prop) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l : list α) (hl₁ : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (hl₂ : l ≠ []) :
(l.pmap f hl₁).last (mt list.pmap_eq_nil.1 hl₂) = f (l.last hl₂) (hl₁ _ (list.last_mem hl₂)) :=
begin
induction l with l_hd l_tl l_ih,
{ apply (hl₂ rfl).elim },
{ cases l_tl,
{ simp },
{ apply l_ih } }
end
lemma nth_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) {l : list α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (n : ℕ) :
nth (pmap f l h) n = option.pmap f (nth l n) (λ x H, h x (nth_mem H)) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp },
{ cases n; simp [hl] }
end
lemma nth_le_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) {l : list α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
nth_le (pmap f l h) n hn = f (nth_le l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))
(h _ (nth_le_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp only [length, pmap] at hn,
exact absurd hn (not_lt_of_le n.zero_le) },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simpa [hl] } }
end
/-! ### find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases h : p a,
{ simp only [find_cons_of_pos _ h, h, not_true, false_and] },
{ rwa [find_cons_of_neg _ h, iff_true_intro h, true_and] }
end
theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, exact h },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, apply mem_cons_self },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-! ### lookmap -/
section lookmap
variables (f : α → option α)
@[simp] theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := rfl
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap (λ _, none) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → option α} :
∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [] H := rfl
| (a::l) H := begin
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
cases h : g a with b,
{ simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)] }
end
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), g a = g b) :
∀ l : list α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin
cases h' : f a with b,
{ simp [h', lookmap_map_eq] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h'] }
end
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), a = b) (l : list α) : l.lookmap f = l :=
by rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
theorem length_lookmap (l : list α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l :=
by rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ (λ _, ()), length_map]; simp
end lookmap
/-! ### filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]; split; refl
lemma filter_map_append {α β : Type*} (l l' : list α) (f : α → option β) :
filter_map f (l ++ l') = filter_map f l ++ filter_map f l' :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ rw [cons_append, filter_map, filter_map],
cases f hd;
simp only [filter_map, hl, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, and_self] }
end
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
simp only [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH, map_cons], split; refl
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
by_cases pa : p a,
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_pos pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ pa], split; refl },
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_neg pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ pa] }
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp only [h, option.none_bind'] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp only [h, h', option.some_bind']
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases h : p x,
{ simp only [option.guard, if_pos h, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [option.guard, if_neg h, option.none_bind'] }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ split, { intro H, cases H }, { rintro ⟨_, H, _⟩, cases H } },
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp only [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left, this, false_or] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp only [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this, exists_eq_left] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp only [map_filter_map, H, filter_map_some]
theorem sublist.filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp only [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp only [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_map f ▸ s.filter_map _
/-! ### reduce_option -/
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_cons_of_some (x : α) (l : list (option α)) :
reduce_option (some x :: l) = x :: l.reduce_option :=
by simp only [reduce_option, filter_map, id.def, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_cons_of_none (l : list (option α)) :
reduce_option (none :: l) = l.reduce_option :=
by simp only [reduce_option, filter_map, id.def]
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_nil : @reduce_option α [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_map {l : list (option α)} {f : α → β} :
reduce_option (map (option.map f) l) = map f (reduce_option l) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [reduce_option_nil, map_nil] },
{ cases hd;
simpa only [true_and, option.map_some', map, eq_self_iff_true,
reduce_option_cons_of_some] using hl },
end
lemma reduce_option_append (l l' : list (option α)) :
(l ++ l').reduce_option = l.reduce_option ++ l'.reduce_option :=
filter_map_append l l' id
lemma reduce_option_length_le (l : list (option α)) :
l.reduce_option.length ≤ l.length :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [reduce_option_nil, length] },
{ cases hd,
{ exact nat.le_succ_of_le hl },
{ simpa only [length, add_le_add_iff_right, reduce_option_cons_of_some] using hl} }
end
lemma reduce_option_length_eq_iff {l : list (option α)} :
l.reduce_option.length = l.length ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, option.is_some x :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [forall_const, reduce_option_nil, not_mem_nil,
forall_prop_of_false, eq_self_iff_true, length, not_false_iff] },
{ cases hd,
{ simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, bool.coe_sort_ff, false_and,
reduce_option_cons_of_none, length, option.is_some_none, iff_false],
intro H,
have := reduce_option_length_le tl,
rw H at this,
exact absurd (nat.lt_succ_self _) (not_lt_of_le this) },
{ simp only [hl, true_and, mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, add_left_inj,
bool.coe_sort_tt, length, option.is_some_some, reduce_option_cons_of_some] } }
end
lemma reduce_option_length_lt_iff {l : list (option α)} :
l.reduce_option.length < l.length ↔ none ∈ l :=
begin
convert not_iff_not.mpr reduce_option_length_eq_iff;
simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, reduce_option_length_le l, option.is_none_iff_eq_none]
end
lemma reduce_option_singleton (x : option α) :
[x].reduce_option = x.to_list :=
by cases x; refl
lemma reduce_option_concat (l : list (option α)) (x : option α) :
(l.concat x).reduce_option = l.reduce_option ++ x.to_list :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing x,
{ cases x;
simp [option.to_list] },
{ simp only [concat_eq_append, reduce_option_append] at hl,
cases hd;
simp [hl, reduce_option_append] }
end
lemma reduce_option_concat_of_some (l : list (option α)) (x : α) :
(l.concat (some x)).reduce_option = l.reduce_option.concat x :=
by simp only [reduce_option_nil, concat_eq_append, reduce_option_append, reduce_option_cons_of_some]
lemma reduce_option_mem_iff {l : list (option α)} {x : α} :
x ∈ l.reduce_option ↔ (some x) ∈ l :=
by simp only [reduce_option, id.def, mem_filter_map, exists_eq_right]
lemma reduce_option_nth_iff {l : list (option α)} {x : α} :
(∃ i, l.nth i = some (some x)) ↔ ∃ i, l.reduce_option.nth i = some x :=
by rw [←mem_iff_nth, ←mem_iff_nth, reduce_option_mem_iff]
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p l = foldr (λ a out, if p a then a :: out else out) [] l :=
by induction l; simp [*, filter]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw forall_mem_cons at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h.1.1 pa), filter_congr h.2],
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ (mt h.1.2 pa), filter_congr h.2]];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
(filter_sublist l).subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, by simpa only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb] using ain,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| (_::l) (or.inl rfl) pa := by rw filter_cons_of_pos _ pa; apply mem_cons_self
| (b::l) (or.inr ain) pa := if pb : p b
then by rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; apply mem_cons_of_mem; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
else by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb]; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_inj, ih, and_iff_right h] },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
refine iff_of_false _ (mt and.left h), intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _) }
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
variable (p)
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_filter p ▸ s.filter_map _
theorem map_filter (f : β → α) (l : list β) :
filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_filter (q) [decidable_pred q] : ∀ l,
filter p (filter q l) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := by by_cases hp : p a; by_cases hq : q a; simp only [hp, hq, filter, if_true, if_false,
true_and, false_and, filter_filter l, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma filter_true {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, true)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, true) h l = l :=
by convert filter_eq_self.2 (λ _ _, trivial)
@[simp] lemma filter_false {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, false)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, false) h l = [] :=
by convert filter_eq_nil.2 (λ _ _, id)
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop : ∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) :=
if pa : p a then by simp only [span, if_pos pa, span_eq_take_drop l, take_while, drop_while]
else by simp only [span, take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop : ∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_pos pa, if_pos pa, cons_append,
take_while_append_drop l]
else by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa, if_neg pa, nil_append]
@[simp] theorem countp_nil : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l ih; [refl, by_cases (p x)];
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, countp, ih, if_pos h],
simp only [countp_cons_of_neg _ _ h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg _ h]]; refl
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa only [countp_eq_length_filter] using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter p s)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (l : list α) :
countp p (filter q l) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
end filter
/-! ### count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_tail : Π (l : list α) (a : α) (h : 0 < l.length),
l.tail.count a = l.count a - ite (a = list.nth_le l 0 h) 1 0
| (_ :: _) a h := by { rw [count_cons], split_ifs; simp }
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist _
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append _
theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by simp [-add_comm]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp only [count, countp_pos, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp only [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa only [count_repeat] using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
theorem repeat_count_eq_of_count_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = length l) :
repeat a (count a l) = l :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq (le_count_iff_repeat_sublist.mp (le_refl (count a l)))
(eq.trans (length_repeat a (count a l)) h)
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {l : list α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p l) = count a l :=
by simp only [count, countp_filter]; congr; exact
set.ext (λ b, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ e, e ▸ h))
end count
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) :=
by rw ← list.append_assoc; apply infix_append
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp only [h, append_nil]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp only [reverse_reverse]
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_infix_nil {l : list α} : l <:+: [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_infix_nil, λ h, h ▸ infix_refl _⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_prefix_nil {l : list α} : l <+: [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_prefix_nil, λ h, h ▸ prefix_refl _⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
@[simp] theorem eq_nil_iff_suffix_nil {l : list α} : l <:+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_suffix_nil, λ h, h ▸ suffix_refl _⟩
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_right_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem tail_suffix (l : list α) : tail l <:+ l := by rw ← drop_one; apply drop_suffix
theorem tail_subset (l : list α) : tail l ⊆ l := (sublist_of_suffix (tail_suffix l)).subset
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; rw drop_left, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp only [length_append, nat.add_sub_cancel, take_left], λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
lemma prefix_take_le_iff {L : list (list (option α))} {m n : ℕ} (hm : m < L.length) :
(take m L) <+: (take n L) ↔ m ≤ n :=
begin
simp only [prefix_iff_eq_take, length_take],
induction m with m IH generalizing L n,
{ simp only [min_eq_left, eq_self_iff_true, nat.zero_le, take] },
{ cases n,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, take, take_nil],
split,
{ cases L,
{ exact absurd hm (not_lt_of_le m.succ.zero_le) },
{ simp only [forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff, take] } },
{ intro h,
contradiction } },
{ cases L with l ls,
{ exact absurd hm (not_lt_of_le m.succ.zero_le) },
{ simp only [length] at hm,
specialize @IH ls n (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm),
simp only [le_of_lt (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm), min_eq_left] at IH,
simp only [le_of_lt hm, IH, true_and, min_eq_left, eq_self_iff_true, length, take],
exact ⟨nat.succ_le_succ, nat.le_of_succ_le_succ⟩ } } },
end
lemma cons_prefix_iff {l l' : list α} {x y : α} :
x :: l <+: y :: l' ↔ x = y ∧ l <+: l' :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨L, hL⟩,
simp only [cons_append] at hL,
exact ⟨hL.left, ⟨L, hL.right⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨rfl, h⟩,
rwa [prefix_cons_inj] },
end
lemma map_prefix {l l' : list α} (f : α → β) (h : l <+: l') :
l.map f <+: l'.map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp only [nil_prefix, map_nil] },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simpa only using eq_nil_of_prefix_nil h },
{ rw cons_prefix_iff at h,
simp only [h, prefix_cons_inj, hl, map] } },
end
lemma is_prefix.filter_map {l l' : list α} (h : l <+: l') (f : α → option β) :
l.filter_map f <+: l'.filter_map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp only [nil_prefix, filter_map_nil] },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simpa only using eq_nil_of_prefix_nil h },
{ rw cons_prefix_iff at h,
rw [←@singleton_append _ hd _, ←@singleton_append _ hd' _, filter_map_append,
filter_map_append, h.left, prefix_append_right_inj],
exact hl h.right } },
end
lemma is_prefix.reduce_option {l l' : list (option α)} (h : l <+: l') :
l.reduce_option <+: l'.reduce_option :=
h.filter_map id
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa only [inits, mem_singleton],
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp only [tails, mem_singleton];
exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp only [tails, mem_cons_iff, mem_tails s t];
exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
lemma inits_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : inits (a :: l) = [] :: l.inits.map (λ t, a :: t) :=
by simp
lemma tails_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tails (a :: l) = (a :: l) :: l.tails :=
by simp
@[simp]
lemma inits_append : ∀ (s t : list α), inits (s ++ t) = s.inits ++ t.inits.tail.map (λ l, s ++ l)
| [] [] := by simp
| [] (a::t) := by simp
| (a::s) t := by simp [inits_append s t]
@[simp]
lemma tails_append : ∀ (s t : list α), tails (s ++ t) = s.tails.map (λ l, l ++ t) ++ t.tails.tail
| [] [] := by simp
| [] (a::t) := by simp
| (a::s) t := by simp [tails_append s t]
-- the lemma names `inits_eq_tails` and `tails_eq_inits` are like `sublists_eq_sublists'`
lemma inits_eq_tails :
∀ (l : list α), l.inits = (reverse $ map reverse $ tails $ reverse l)
| [] := by simp
| (a :: l) := by simp [inits_eq_tails l, map_eq_map_iff]
lemma tails_eq_inits :
∀ (l : list α), l.tails = (reverse $ map reverse $ inits $ reverse l)
| [] := by simp
| (a :: l) := by simp [tails_eq_inits l, append_left_inj]
lemma inits_reverse (l : list α) : inits (reverse l) = reverse (map reverse l.tails) :=
by { rw tails_eq_inits l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma tails_reverse (l : list α) : tails (reverse l) = reverse (map reverse l.inits) :=
by { rw inits_eq_tails l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma map_reverse_inits (l : list α) : map reverse l.inits = (reverse $ tails $ reverse l) :=
by { rw inits_eq_tails l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma map_reverse_tails (l : list α) : map reverse l.tails = (reverse $ inits $ reverse l) :=
by { rw tails_eq_inits l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp only [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists', map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s,
{ simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map],
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ h },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl h },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l, length_map,
length, pow_succ', mul_succ, mul_zero, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp only [*, append_assoc]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp only [sublists_aux, foldr_cons], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr' 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih, {refl},
simp only [ih, foldr_cons]
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, nil_append, append_nil]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, cons_append, sublists_aux₁_append l₁, append_assoc];
refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp only [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁, append_assoc, append_nil]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := rfl
| (a::l) f g := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, bind_append, sublists_aux₁_bind l]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp only [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux₁_append, bind_eq_bind,
sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, apply congr_arg _,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], exact (append_nil _).symm
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp only [map, sublists, sublists_aux_cons_append, map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind,
cons_bind, map_id', append_nil, cons_append, map_id' (λ _, rfl)]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_bind, cons_bind, cons_bind, nil_bind,
map_eq_map, map_eq_map, map_id' (append_nil), append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [refl,
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind, map_map, cons_bind, append_nil, nil_bind, (∘)]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id' (reverse_reverse)]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro, {rwa foldr},
simp only [foldr, mem_cons_iff, false_or, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_injective reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2 $ singleton_sublist.2 $
mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by refl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
/-! ### sublists_len -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
of `f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublists_len_aux {α β : Type*} : ℕ → list α → (list α → β) → list β → list β
| 0 l f r := f [] :: r
| (n+1) [] f r := r
| (n+1) (a::l) f r := sublists_len_aux (n + 1) l f
(sublists_len_aux n l (f ∘ list.cons a) r)
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
`l = [0, 1, 2, 3]` and `n = 2`, one gets
`[[2, 3], [1, 3], [1, 2], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1]]`. -/
def sublists_len {α : Type*} (n : ℕ) (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists_len_aux n l id []
lemma sublists_len_aux_append {α β γ : Type*} :
∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (g : β → γ) (r : list β) (s : list γ),
sublists_len_aux n l (g ∘ f) (r.map g ++ s) =
(sublists_len_aux n l f r).map g ++ s
| 0 l f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) [] f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) f g r s := begin
unfold sublists_len_aux,
rw [show ((g ∘ f) ∘ list.cons a) = (g ∘ f ∘ list.cons a), by refl,
sublists_len_aux_append, sublists_len_aux_append]
end
lemma sublists_len_aux_eq {α β : Type*} (l : list α) (n) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux n l f r = (sublists_len n l).map f ++ r :=
by rw [sublists_len, ← sublists_len_aux_append]; refl
lemma sublists_len_aux_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux 0 l f r = f [] :: r := by cases l; refl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) :
sublists_len 0 l = [[]] := sublists_len_aux_zero _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_nil {α : Type*} (n) :
sublists_len (n+1) (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_cons {α : Type*} (n) (a : α) (l) :
sublists_len (n + 1) (a::l) =
sublists_len (n + 1) l ++ (sublists_len n l).map (cons a) :=
by rw [sublists_len, sublists_len_aux, sublists_len_aux_eq,
sublists_len_aux_eq, map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] lemma length_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
length (sublists_len n l) = nat.choose (length l) n
| 0 l := by simp
| (n+1) [] := by simp
| (n+1) (a::l) := by simp [-add_comm, nat.choose, *]; apply add_comm
lemma sublists_len_sublist_sublists' {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
sublists_len n l <+ sublists' l
| 0 l := singleton_sublist.2 (mem_sublists'.2 (nil_sublist _))
| (n+1) [] := nil_sublist _
| (n+1) (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, sublists'_cons],
exact (sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).append
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).map _)
end
lemma sublists_len_sublist_of_sublist
{α : Type*} (n) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : sublists_len n l₁ <+ sublists_len n l₂ :=
begin
induction n with n IHn generalizing l₁ l₂, {simp},
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH, {refl},
{ refine IH.trans _,
rw sublists_len_succ_cons,
apply sublist_append_left },
{ simp [sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact IH.append ((IHn s).map _) }
end
lemma length_of_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ {n} {l l' : list α},
l' ∈ sublists_len n l → length l' = n
| 0 l l' (or.inl rfl) := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) l' h := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, mem_append, mem_map] at h,
rcases h with h | ⟨l', h, rfl⟩,
{ exact length_of_sublists_len h },
{ exact congr_arg (+1) (length_of_sublists_len h) },
end
lemma mem_sublists_len_self {α : Type*} {l l' : list α}
(h : l' <+ l) : l' ∈ sublists_len (length l') l :=
begin
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ cases l₁ with b l₁,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_left _ IH } },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_right _ (mem_map.2 ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩) }
end
@[simp] lemma mem_sublists_len {α : Type*} {n} {l l' : list α} :
l' ∈ sublists_len n l ↔ l' <+ l ∧ length l' = n :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_sublists'.1
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).subset h),
length_of_sublists_len h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_sublists_len_self h₁⟩
/-! ### permutations -/
section permutations
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]; refl
end permutations
/-! ### insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_pos h]
@[simp, priority 970]
theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_neg h]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l,
{ simp only [insert_of_mem h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h' },
simp only [insert_of_not_mem h', mem_cons_iff]
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; [simp only [insert_of_mem h], simp only [insert_of_not_mem h, suffix_cons]]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by rw insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by rw insert_of_not_mem h; refl
end insert
/-! ### erasep -/
section erasep
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem erasep_nil : [].erasep p = [] := rfl
theorem erasep_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
(a :: l).erasep p = if p a then l else a :: l.erasep p := rfl
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : p a) : (a :: l).erasep p = l :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ p a) :
(a::l).erasep p = a :: l.erasep p :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
theorem erasep_of_forall_not {l : list α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) : l.erasep p = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [h _ (or.inl rfl), ih (forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_of_erasep {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {cases al},
by_cases pb : p b,
{ exact ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩ },
{ rcases al with rfl | al, {exact pb.elim pa},
rcases IH al with ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
exact ⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw h₃; refl, by simp [pb, h₄]⟩ }
end
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
l.erasep p = l ∨ ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, ha, pa⟩,
exact or.inr (exists_of_erasep ha pa) },
{ simp at h, exact or.inl (erasep_of_forall_not h) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_erasep_of_mem {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.erasep p) = pred (length l) :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep al pa with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩;
rw e₂; simp [-add_comm, e₁]; refl
theorem erasep_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁.erasep p ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : p x; simp [h'],
rw erasep_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (mt _ h') h),
rintro rfl, exact pa
end
theorem erasep_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂.erasep p
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1,
erasep_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem erasep_sublist (l : list α) : l.erasep p <+ l :=
by rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩;
[rw h, {rw [h₄, h₃], simp}]
theorem erasep_subset (l : list α) : l.erasep p ⊆ l :=
(erasep_sublist l).subset
theorem sublist.erasep {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erasep p <+ l₂.erasep p :=
begin
induction s,
case list.sublist.slnil { refl },
case list.sublist.cons : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [IH.trans (erasep_sublist _), IH.cons _ _ _] },
case list.sublist.cons2 : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [s, IH.cons2 _ _ _] }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_erasep {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erasep p → a ∈ l :=
@erasep_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erasep_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (pa : ¬ p a) : a ∈ l.erasep p ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erasep, λ al, begin
rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
{ rwa h },
{ rw h₄, rw h₃ at al,
have : a ≠ c, {rintro rfl, exact pa.elim h₂},
simpa [this] using al }
end⟩
theorem erasep_map (f : β → α) :
∀ (l : list β), (map f l).erasep p = map f (l.erasep (p ∘ f))
| [] := rfl
| (b::l) := by by_cases p (f b); simp [h, erasep_map l]
@[simp] theorem extractp_eq_find_erasep :
∀ l : list α, extractp p l = (find p l, erasep p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [extractp, pa, extractp_eq_find_erasep l]
end erasep
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
(b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]; split; refl
theorem erase_eq_erasep (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a = l.erasep (eq a) :=
by { induction l with b l, {refl},
by_cases a = b; [simp [h], simp [h, ne.symm h, *]] }
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erasep_of_forall_not]; rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep h rfl with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, rfl, h₂, h₃⟩;
rw erase_eq_erasep; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, λ h, h₁ _ h rfl, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact length_erasep_of_mem h rfl
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_append_left (by refl) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_append_right];
rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; apply erasep_sublist
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
(erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact sublist.erasep h
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact mem_erasep_of_neg ab.symm
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by rw ab else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α}
(l : list α) : map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_map]; congr;
ext b; simp [finj.eq_iff]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; [refl,
simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s a) = pred (count a s)
| [] := by simp
| (h :: t) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
by_cases p : h = a,
{ rw [if_pos p, count_cons', if_pos p.symm], simp },
{ rw [if_neg p, count_cons', count_cons', if_neg (λ x : a = h, p x.symm), count_erase_self],
simp, }
end
@[simp] theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s b) = count a s
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [count_cons', h, if_neg ab], simp },
{ rw [count_cons', count_cons', count_erase_of_ne] }
end
end erase
/-! ### diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp only [list.diff, if_pos h]
else by simp only [list.diff, if_neg h, erase_of_not_mem h]
lemma diff_cons_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.diff l₂).erase a :=
begin
induction l₂ with b l₂ ih generalizing l₁ a,
{ simp_rw [diff_cons, diff_nil] },
{ rw [diff_cons, diff_cons, erase_comm, ← diff_cons, ih, ← diff_cons] }
end
lemma diff_erase (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : (l₁.diff l₂).erase a = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
by rw [← diff_cons_right, diff_cons]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : list α) : [].diff l = [] :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, diff_cons, erase_of_not_mem (not_mem_nil _)]]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| l₁ [] := sublist.refl _
| l₁ (a::l₂) := calc l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ : diff_cons _ _ _
... <+ l₁.erase a : diff_sublist _ _
... <+ l₁ : list.erase_sublist _ _
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
(diff_sublist _ _).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] h₁ h₂ := h₁
| l₁ (b::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by rw diff_cons; exact
mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne (ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂)).2 h₁) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h₂)
theorem sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃: list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| l₁ l₂ [] h := h
| l₁ l₂ (a::l₃) h := by simp only
[diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α},
l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [] l₂ h := erase_sublist _ _
| (b::l₁) l₂ h := if heq : b = a then by simp only [heq, erase_cons_head, diff_cons]
else by simpa only [erase_cons_head, erase_cons_tail _ heq, diff_cons,
erase_comm a b l₂]
using erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist (h.erase b)
end diff
/-! ### enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_nth, zero_add]; intros; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
theorem mem_enum_from {x : α} {i : ℕ} :
∀ {j : ℕ} (xs : list α), (i, x) ∈ xs.enum_from j → j ≤ i ∧ i < j + xs.length ∧ x ∈ xs
| j [] := by simp [enum_from]
| j (y :: ys) :=
suffices i = j ∧ x = y ∨ (i, x) ∈ enum_from (j + 1) ys →
j ≤ i ∧ i < j + (length ys + 1) ∧ (x = y ∨ x ∈ ys),
by simpa [enum_from, mem_enum_from ys],
begin
rintro (h|h),
{ refine ⟨le_of_eq h.1.symm,h.1 ▸ _,or.inl h.2⟩,
apply nat.lt_add_of_pos_right; simp },
{ obtain ⟨hji, hijlen, hmem⟩ := mem_enum_from _ h,
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (nat.le_succ _) hji },
{ convert hijlen using 1, ac_refl },
{ simp [hmem] } }
end
/-! ### product -/
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp only [product, mem_bind, mem_map, prod.ext_iff, exists_prop,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [exact (zero_mul _).symm,
simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH,
right_distrib, one_mul, length_map, add_comm]]
/-! ### sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp only [list.sigma, mem_bind, mem_map, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left,
and.left_comm, exists_eq_left, heq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [refl,
simp only [map, sigma_cons, length_append, length_map, IH, sum_cons]]
end
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : list α) : disjoint l [] :=
by rw disjoint_comm; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_singleton, forall_eq]; refl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_take_drop {l : list α} {m n : ℕ} (hl : l.nodup) (h : m ≤ n) :
disjoint (l.take m) (l.drop n) :=
begin
induction l generalizing m n,
case list.nil : m n
{ simp },
case list.cons : x xs xs_ih m n
{ cases m; cases n; simp only [disjoint_cons_left, mem_cons_iff, disjoint_cons_right, drop,
true_or, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and,
disjoint_nil_left, take],
{ cases h },
cases hl with _ _ h₀ h₁, split,
{ intro h, exact h₀ _ (mem_of_mem_drop h) rfl, },
solve_by_elim [le_of_succ_le_succ] { max_depth := 4 } },
end
end disjoint
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [nil_union, not_mem_nil, false_or, cons_union, mem_insert_iff,
mem_cons_iff, or_assoc, *]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂
then ⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else ⟨a::t, cons_sublist_cons _ s, by simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h];
split; refl⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/-! ### inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter, not_and]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
@[simp] lemma inter_reverse {xs ys : list α} :
xs.inter ys.reverse = xs.inter ys :=
by simp only [list.inter, mem_reverse]; congr
end inter
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
/-! ### map₂_left' -/
section map₂_left'
-- The definitional equalities for `map₂_left'` can already be used by the
-- simplifie because `map₂_left'` is marked `@[simp]`.
@[simp] theorem map₂_left'_nil_right (f : α → option β → γ) (as) :
map₂_left' f as [] = (as.map (λ a, f a none), []) :=
by cases as; refl
end map₂_left'
/-! ### map₂_right' -/
section map₂_right'
variables (f : option α → β → γ) (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_left :
map₂_right' f [] bs = (bs.map (f none), []) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_right :
map₂_right' f as [] = ([], as) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_cons :
map₂_right' f [] (b :: bs) = (f none b :: bs.map (f none), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_cons_cons :
map₂_right' f (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := map₂_right' f as bs in
(f (some a) b :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end map₂_right'
/-! ### zip_left' -/
section zip_left'
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_nil_right :
zip_left' as ([] : list β) = (as.map (λ a, (a, none)), []) :=
by cases as; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_nil_left :
zip_left' ([] : list α) bs = ([], bs) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_cons_nil :
zip_left' (a :: as) ([] : list β) = ((a, none) :: as.map (λ a, (a, none)), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_cons_cons :
zip_left' (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := zip_left' as bs in
((a, some b) :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end zip_left'
/-! ### zip_right' -/
section zip_right'
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_left :
zip_right' ([] : list α) bs = (bs.map (λ b, (none, b)), []) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_right :
zip_right' as ([] : list β) = ([], as) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_cons :
zip_right' ([] : list α) (b :: bs) = ((none, b) :: bs.map (λ b, (none, b)), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_cons_cons :
zip_right' (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := zip_right' as bs in
((some a, b) :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end zip_right'
/-! ### map₂_left -/
section map₂_left
variables (f : α → option β → γ) (as : list α)
-- The definitional equalities for `map₂_left` can already be used by the
-- simplifier because `map₂_left` is marked `@[simp]`.
@[simp] theorem map₂_left_nil_right :
map₂_left f as [] = as.map (λ a, f a none) :=
by cases as; refl
theorem map₂_left_eq_map₂_left' : ∀ as bs,
map₂_left f as bs = (map₂_left' f as bs).fst
| [] bs := by simp!
| (a :: as) [] := by simp!
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) := by simp! [*]
theorem map₂_left_eq_map₂ : ∀ as bs,
length as ≤ length bs →
map₂_left f as bs = map₂ (λ a b, f a (some b)) as bs
| [] [] h := by simp!
| [] (b :: bs) h := by simp!
| (a :: as) [] h := by { simp at h, contradiction }
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) h := by { simp at h, simp! [*] }
end map₂_left
/-! ### map₂_right -/
section map₂_right
variables (f : option α → β → γ) (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_left :
map₂_right f [] bs = bs.map (f none) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_right :
map₂_right f as [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_cons :
map₂_right f [] (b :: bs) = f none b :: bs.map (f none) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_cons_cons :
map₂_right f (a :: as) (b :: bs) = f (some a) b :: map₂_right f as bs :=
rfl
theorem map₂_right_eq_map₂_right' :
map₂_right f as bs = (map₂_right' f as bs).fst :=
by simp only [map₂_right, map₂_right', map₂_left_eq_map₂_left']
theorem map₂_right_eq_map₂ (h : length bs ≤ length as) :
map₂_right f as bs = map₂ (λ a b, f (some a) b) as bs :=
begin
have : (λ a b, flip f a (some b)) = (flip (λ a b, f (some a) b)) := rfl,
simp only [map₂_right, map₂_left_eq_map₂, map₂_flip, *]
end
end map₂_right
/-! ### zip_left -/
section zip_left
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_left_nil_right :
zip_left as ([] : list β) = as.map (λ a, (a, none)) :=
by cases as; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_nil_left :
zip_left ([] : list α) bs = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_cons_nil :
zip_left (a :: as) ([] : list β) = (a, none) :: as.map (λ a, (a, none)) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_cons_cons :
zip_left (a :: as) (b :: bs) = (a, some b) :: zip_left as bs :=
rfl
theorem zip_left_eq_zip_left' :
zip_left as bs = (zip_left' as bs).fst :=
by simp only [zip_left, zip_left', map₂_left_eq_map₂_left']
end zip_left
/-! ### zip_right -/
section zip_right
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_left :
zip_right ([] : list α) bs = bs.map (λ b, (none, b)) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_right :
zip_right as ([] : list β) = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_cons :
zip_right ([] : list α) (b :: bs) = (none, b) :: bs.map (λ b, (none, b)) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_cons_cons :
zip_right (a :: as) (b :: bs) = (some a, b) :: zip_right as bs :=
rfl
theorem zip_right_eq_zip_right' :
zip_right as bs = (zip_right' as bs).fst :=
by simp only [zip_right, zip_right', map₂_right_eq_map₂_right']
end zip_right
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem ilast'_mem : ∀ a l, @ilast' α a l ∈ a :: l
| a [] := or.inl rfl
| a (b::l) := or.inr (ilast'_mem b l)
@[simp] lemma nth_le_attach (L : list α) (i) (H : i < L.attach.length) :
(L.attach.nth_le i H).1 = L.nth_le i (length_attach L ▸ H) :=
calc (L.attach.nth_le i H).1
= (L.attach.map subtype.val).nth_le i (by simpa using H) : by rw nth_le_map'
... = L.nth_le i _ : by congr; apply attach_map_val
end list
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.map_list_prod {α β : Type*} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β) (l : list α) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
(l.prod_hom f).symm
namespace list
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_hom {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (L : list α) (f : α → β) (g : β →* γ) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g ((L.map f).prod) :=
by {rw g.map_list_prod, exact congr_arg _ (map_map _ _ _).symm}
theorem sum_map_mul_left {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, r * f b)).sum = r * (L.map f).sum :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_left r
theorem sum_map_mul_right {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, f b * r)).sum = (L.map f).sum * r :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_right r
universes u v
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_swap {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (x : α) (y : β) (xs : list (α × β)) :
(y, x) ∈ map prod.swap xs ↔ (x, y) ∈ xs :=
begin
induction xs with x xs,
{ simp only [not_mem_nil, map_nil] },
{ cases x with a b,
simp only [mem_cons_iff, prod.mk.inj_iff, map, prod.swap_prod_mk, prod.exists, xs_ih],
tauto! },
end
lemma slice_eq {α} (xs : list α) (n m : ℕ) :
slice n m xs = xs.take n ++ xs.drop (n+m) :=
begin
induction n generalizing xs,
{ simp [slice] },
{ cases xs; simp [slice, *, nat.succ_add], }
end
lemma sizeof_slice_lt {α} [has_sizeof α] (i j : ℕ) (hj : 0 < j) (xs : list α) (hi : i < xs.length) :
sizeof (list.slice i j xs) < sizeof xs :=
begin
induction xs generalizing i j,
case list.nil : i j h
{ cases hi },
case list.cons : x xs xs_ih i j h
{ cases i; simp only [-slice_eq, list.slice],
{ cases j, cases h,
dsimp only [drop], unfold_wf,
apply @lt_of_le_of_lt _ _ _ xs.sizeof,
{ clear_except,
induction xs generalizing j; unfold_wf,
case list.nil : j
{ refl },
case list.cons : xs_hd xs_tl xs_ih j
{ cases j; unfold_wf, refl,
transitivity, apply xs_ih,
simp }, },
unfold_wf, apply zero_lt_one_add, },
{ unfold_wf, apply xs_ih _ _ h,
apply lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi, } },
end
end list
|
6b2d34e07ff665170c0522e814474b850114f5bd | 92b50235facfbc08dfe7f334827d47281471333b | /hott/init/nat.hlean | 19953fb4f70dcf9c8cc0768cfc2c575f1c1be15b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | htzh/lean | 24f6ed7510ab637379ec31af406d12584d31792c | d70c79f4e30aafecdfc4a60b5d3512199200ab6e | refs/heads/master | 1,607,677,731,270 | 1,437,089,952,000 | 1,437,089,952,000 | 37,078,816 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,433,780,956,000 | 1,433,780,955,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,186 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.wf init.tactic init.hedberg init.util init.types
open eq decidable sum lift is_trunc
namespace nat
notation `ℕ` := nat
/- basic definitions on natural numbers -/
inductive le (a : ℕ) : ℕ → Type₀ :=
| refl : le a a
| step : Π {b}, le a b → le a (succ b)
infix `≤` := le
attribute le.refl [refl]
definition lt [reducible] (n m : ℕ) := succ n ≤ m
definition ge [reducible] (n m : ℕ) := m ≤ n
definition gt [reducible] (n m : ℕ) := succ m ≤ n
infix `<` := lt
infix `≥` := ge
infix `>` := gt
definition pred [unfold 1] (a : nat) : nat :=
nat.cases_on a zero (λ a₁, a₁)
-- add is defined in init.num
definition sub (a b : nat) : nat :=
nat.rec_on b a (λ b₁ r, pred r)
definition mul (a b : nat) : nat :=
nat.rec_on b zero (λ b₁ r, r + a)
notation a - b := sub a b
notation a * b := mul a b
/- properties of ℕ -/
protected definition is_inhabited [instance] : inhabited nat :=
inhabited.mk zero
protected definition has_decidable_eq [instance] : ∀ x y : nat, decidable (x = y)
| has_decidable_eq zero zero := inl rfl
| has_decidable_eq (succ x) zero := inr (by contradiction)
| has_decidable_eq zero (succ y) := inr (by contradiction)
| has_decidable_eq (succ x) (succ y) :=
match has_decidable_eq x y with
| inl xeqy := inl (by rewrite xeqy)
| inr xney := inr (λ h : succ x = succ y, by injection h with xeqy; exact absurd xeqy xney)
end
/- properties of inequality -/
definition le_of_eq {n m : ℕ} (p : n = m) : n ≤ m := p ▸ le.refl n
definition le_succ (n : ℕ) : n ≤ succ n := by repeat constructor
definition pred_le (n : ℕ) : pred n ≤ n := by cases n;all_goals (repeat constructor)
definition le.trans [trans] {n m k : ℕ} (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m ≤ k) : n ≤ k :=
by induction H2 with n H2 IH;exact H1;exact le.step IH
definition le_succ_of_le {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) : n ≤ succ m := le.trans H !le_succ
definition le_of_succ_le {n m : ℕ} (H : succ n ≤ m) : n ≤ m := le.trans !le_succ H
definition le_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (H : n < m) : n ≤ m := le_of_succ_le H
definition succ_le_succ [unfold 3] {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) : succ n ≤ succ m :=
by induction H;reflexivity;exact le.step v_0
definition pred_le_pred [unfold 3] {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) : pred n ≤ pred m :=
by induction H;reflexivity;cases b;exact v_0;exact le.step v_0
definition le_of_succ_le_succ [unfold 3] {n m : ℕ} (H : succ n ≤ succ m) : n ≤ m :=
pred_le_pred H
definition le_succ_of_pred_le [unfold 1] {n m : ℕ} (H : pred n ≤ m) : n ≤ succ m :=
by cases n;exact le.step H;exact succ_le_succ H
definition not_succ_le_self {n : ℕ} : ¬succ n ≤ n :=
by induction n with n IH;all_goals intros;cases a;apply IH;exact le_of_succ_le_succ a
definition zero_le (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ n :=
by induction n with n IH;apply le.refl;exact le.step IH
definition lt.step {n m : ℕ} (H : n < m) : n < succ m :=
le.step H
definition zero_lt_succ (n : ℕ) : 0 < succ n :=
by induction n with n IH;apply le.refl;exact le.step IH
definition lt.trans [trans] {n m k : ℕ} (H1 : n < m) (H2 : m < k) : n < k :=
le.trans (le.step H1) H2
definition lt_of_le_of_lt [trans] {n m k : ℕ} (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m < k) : n < k :=
le.trans (succ_le_succ H1) H2
definition lt_of_lt_of_le [trans] {n m k : ℕ} (H1 : n < m) (H2 : m ≤ k) : n < k :=
le.trans H1 H2
definition le.antisymm {n m : ℕ} (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m ≤ n) : n = m :=
begin
cases H1 with m' H1',
{ reflexivity},
{ cases H2 with n' H2',
{ reflexivity},
{ exfalso, apply not_succ_le_self, exact lt.trans H1' H2'}},
end
definition not_succ_le_zero (n : ℕ) : ¬succ n ≤ zero :=
by intro H; cases H
definition lt.irrefl (n : ℕ) : ¬n < n := not_succ_le_self
definition self_lt_succ (n : ℕ) : n < succ n := !le.refl
definition lt.base (n : ℕ) : n < succ n := !le.refl
definition le_lt_antisymm {n m : ℕ} (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m < n) : empty :=
!lt.irrefl (lt_of_le_of_lt H1 H2)
definition lt_le_antisymm {n m : ℕ} (H1 : n < m) (H2 : m ≤ n) : empty :=
le_lt_antisymm H2 H1
definition lt.asymm {n m : ℕ} (H1 : n < m) (H2 : m < n) : empty :=
le_lt_antisymm (le_of_lt H1) H2
definition lt.trichotomy (a b : ℕ) : a < b ⊎ a = b ⊎ b < a :=
begin
revert b, induction a with a IH,
{ intro b, cases b,
exact inr (inl idp),
exact inl !zero_lt_succ},
{ intro b, cases b with b,
exact inr (inr !zero_lt_succ),
{ cases IH b with H H,
exact inl (succ_le_succ H),
cases H with H H,
exact inr (inl (ap succ H)),
exact inr (inr (succ_le_succ H))}}
end
definition lt.by_cases {a b : ℕ} {P : Type} (H1 : a < b → P) (H2 : a = b → P) (H3 : b < a → P) : P :=
by induction (lt.trichotomy a b) with H H; exact H1 H; cases H with H H; exact H2 H;exact H3 H
definition lt_ge_by_cases {a b : ℕ} {P : Type} (H1 : a < b → P) (H2 : a ≥ b → P) : P :=
lt.by_cases H1 (λH, H2 (le_of_eq H⁻¹)) (λH, H2 (le_of_lt H))
definition lt_or_ge (a b : ℕ) : (a < b) ⊎ (a ≥ b) :=
lt_ge_by_cases inl inr
definition not_lt_zero (a : ℕ) : ¬ a < zero :=
by intro H; cases H
-- less-than is well-founded
definition lt.wf [instance] : well_founded lt :=
begin
constructor, intro n, induction n with n IH,
{ constructor, intros n H, exfalso, exact !not_lt_zero H},
{ constructor, intros m H,
assert aux : ∀ {n₁} (hlt : m < n₁), succ n = n₁ → acc lt m,
{ intros n₁ hlt, induction hlt,
{ intro p, injection p with q, exact q ▸ IH},
{ intro p, injection p with q, exact (acc.inv (q ▸ IH) a)}},
apply aux H idp},
end
definition measure {A : Type} (f : A → ℕ) : A → A → Type₀ :=
inv_image lt f
definition measure.wf {A : Type} (f : A → ℕ) : well_founded (measure f) :=
inv_image.wf f lt.wf
definition succ_lt_succ {a b : ℕ} (H : a < b) : succ a < succ b :=
succ_le_succ H
definition lt_of_succ_lt {a b : ℕ} (H : succ a < b) : a < b :=
le_of_succ_le H
definition lt_of_succ_lt_succ {a b : ℕ} (H : succ a < succ b) : a < b :=
le_of_succ_le_succ H
definition decidable_le [instance] : decidable_rel le :=
begin
intros n, induction n with n IH,
{ intro m, left, apply zero_le},
{ intro m, cases m with m,
{ right, apply not_succ_le_zero},
{ let H := IH m, clear IH,
cases H with H H,
left, exact succ_le_succ H,
right, intro H2, exact H (le_of_succ_le_succ H2)}}
end
definition decidable_lt [instance] : decidable_rel lt := _
definition decidable_gt [instance] : decidable_rel gt := _
definition decidable_ge [instance] : decidable_rel ge := _
definition eq_or_lt_of_le {a b : ℕ} (H : a ≤ b) : a = b ⊎ a < b :=
by cases H with b' H; exact sum.inl rfl; exact sum.inr (succ_le_succ H)
definition le_of_eq_or_lt {a b : ℕ} (H : a = b ⊎ a < b) : a ≤ b :=
by cases H with H H; exact le_of_eq H; exact le_of_lt H
definition eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : ℕ} (hnlt : ¬ a < b) : a = b ⊎ b < a :=
sum.rec_on (lt.trichotomy a b)
(λ hlt, absurd hlt hnlt)
(λ h, h)
definition lt_succ_of_le {a b : ℕ} (h : a ≤ b) : a < succ b :=
succ_le_succ h
definition lt_of_succ_le {a b : ℕ} (h : succ a ≤ b) : a < b := h
definition succ_le_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (h : a < b) : succ a ≤ b := h
definition max (a b : ℕ) : ℕ := if a < b then b else a
definition min (a b : ℕ) : ℕ := if a < b then a else b
definition max_self (a : ℕ) : max a a = a :=
eq.rec_on !if_t_t rfl
definition max_eq_right {a b : ℕ} (H : a < b) : max a b = b :=
if_pos H
definition max_eq_left {a b : ℕ} (H : ¬ a < b) : max a b = a :=
if_neg H
definition eq_max_right {a b : ℕ} (H : a < b) : b = max a b :=
eq.rec_on (max_eq_right H) rfl
definition eq_max_left {a b : ℕ} (H : ¬ a < b) : a = max a b :=
eq.rec_on (max_eq_left H) rfl
definition le_max_left (a b : ℕ) : a ≤ max a b :=
by_cases
(λ h : a < b, le_of_lt (eq.rec_on (eq_max_right h) h))
(λ h : ¬ a < b, eq.rec_on (eq_max_left h) !le.refl)
definition le_max_right (a b : ℕ) : b ≤ max a b :=
by_cases
(λ h : a < b, eq.rec_on (eq_max_right h) !le.refl)
(λ h : ¬ a < b, sum.rec_on (eq_or_lt_of_not_lt h)
(λ heq, eq.rec_on heq (eq.rec_on (inverse (max_self a)) !le.refl))
(λ h : b < a,
have aux : a = max a b, from eq_max_left (lt.asymm h),
eq.rec_on aux (le_of_lt h)))
definition succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (a b : ℕ) : succ a - succ b = a - b :=
by induction b with b IH; reflexivity; apply ap pred IH
definition sub_eq_succ_sub_succ (a b : ℕ) : a - b = succ a - succ b :=
eq.rec_on (succ_sub_succ_eq_sub a b) rfl
definition zero_sub_eq_zero (a : ℕ) : zero - a = zero :=
nat.rec_on a
rfl
(λ a₁ (ih : zero - a₁ = zero), ap pred ih)
definition zero_eq_zero_sub (a : ℕ) : zero = zero - a :=
eq.rec_on (zero_sub_eq_zero a) rfl
definition sub_lt {a b : ℕ} : zero < a → zero < b → a - b < a :=
have aux : Π {a}, zero < a → Π {b}, zero < b → a - b < a, from
λa h₁, le.rec_on h₁
(λb h₂, le.cases_on h₂
(lt.base zero)
(λ b₁ bpos,
eq.rec_on (sub_eq_succ_sub_succ zero b₁)
(eq.rec_on (zero_eq_zero_sub b₁) (lt.base zero))))
(λa₁ apos ih b h₂, le.cases_on h₂
(lt.base a₁)
(λ b₁ bpos,
eq.rec_on (sub_eq_succ_sub_succ a₁ b₁)
(lt.trans (@ih b₁ bpos) (lt.base a₁)))),
λ h₁ h₂, aux h₁ h₂
definition sub_le (a b : ℕ) : a - b ≤ a :=
nat.rec_on b
(le.refl a)
(λ b₁ ih, le.trans !pred_le ih)
lemma sub_lt_succ (a b : ℕ) : a - b < succ a := lt_succ_of_le (sub_le a b)
end nat
|
5fb424b27daccc75b8134f87f862738e9b8532ac | 46125763b4dbf50619e8846a1371029346f4c3db | /src/data/padics/padic_numbers.lean | 7fe0f4ef37788469321c959f15de030a4080b884 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | thjread/mathlib | a9d97612cedc2c3101060737233df15abcdb9eb1 | 7cffe2520a5518bba19227a107078d83fa725ddc | refs/heads/master | 1,615,637,696,376 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 1,583,953,063,000 | 246,680,271 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,583,960,875,000 | 1,583,960,875,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,541 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import data.real.cau_seq_completion
import data.padics.padic_norm algebra.archimedean analysis.normed_space.basic
import tactic.norm_cast
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the p-adic numbers (rationals) ℚ_p as the completion of ℚ with respect to the
p-adic norm. We show that the p-adic norm on ℚ extends to ℚ_p, that ℚ is embedded in ℚ_p, and that
ℚ_p is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `padic` : the type of p-adic numbers
* `padic_norm_e` : the rational valued p-adic norm on ℚ_p
## Notation
We introduce the notation ℚ_[p] for the p-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking (prime p) as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct ℝ. ℚ_p inherits a
field structure from this construction. The extension of the norm on ℚ to ℚ_p is *not* analogous to
extending the absolute value to ℝ, and hence the proof that ℚ_p is complete is different from the
proof that ℝ is complete.
A small special-purpose simplification tactic, `padic_index_simp`, is used to manipulate sequence
indices in the proof that the norm extends.
`padic_norm_e` is the rational-valued p-adic norm on ℚ_p. To instantiate ℚ_p as a normed field, we
must cast this into a ℝ-valued norm. The ℝ-valued norm, using notation ∥ ∥ from normed spaces, is
the canonical representation of this norm.
Coercions from ℚ to ℚ_p are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouêva, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open nat multiplicity padic_norm cau_seq cau_seq.completion metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the p-adic norm. -/
@[reducible] def padic_seq (p : ℕ) [p.prime] := cau_seq _ (padic_norm p)
namespace padic_seq
section
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
/-- The p-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
lemma stationary {f : cau_seq ℚ (padic_norm p)} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padic_norm p (f n) = padic_norm p (f m) :=
have ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padic_norm p (f j),
from cau_seq.abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero $ not_lim_zero_of_not_congr_zero hf,
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this,
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := cau_seq.cauchy₂ f hε in
⟨ max N1 N2,
λ n m hn hm,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < ε, from hN2 _ _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 (max_le_iff.1 hm).2,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < padic_norm p (f n),
from lt_of_lt_of_le this $ hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < max (padic_norm p (f n)) (padic_norm p (f m)),
from lt_max_iff.2 (or.inl this),
begin
by_contradiction hne,
rw ←padic_norm.neg p (f m) at hne,
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne p hne,
rw [padic_norm.neg, max_comm] at hnam,
rw [←hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this,
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this
end ⟩
/-- For all n ≥ stationary_point f hf, the p-adic norm of f n is the same. -/
def stationary_point {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
classical.some $ stationary hf
lemma stationary_point_spec {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n}, m ≥ stationary_point hf → n ≥ stationary_point hf →
padic_norm p (f n) = padic_norm p (f m) :=
classical.some_spec $ stationary hf
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary, we can lift the norm
to sequences. -/
def norm (f : padic_seq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf))
lemma norm_zero_iff (f : padic_seq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
begin
constructor,
{ intro h,
by_contradiction hf,
unfold norm at h, split_ifs at h,
apply hf,
intros ε hε,
existsi stationary_point hf,
intros j hj,
have heq := stationary_point_spec hf (le_refl _) hj,
simpa [h, heq] },
{ intro h,
simp [norm, h] }
end
end
section embedding
open cau_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
lemma equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : padic_seq p}
(h : ∀ k, padic_norm p (f k) = padic_norm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 :=
λ ε hε, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε in
⟨i, λ j hj, by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
lemma norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
lemma norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padic_norm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padic_norm p (f $ stationary_point hf), by simp [norm, hf],
⟨f $ stationary_point hf, heq,
λ h, norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
lemma not_lim_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬ lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) q) :=
λ h', hq $ const_lim_zero.1 h'
lemma not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬ (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0 :=
λ h : lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) q - 0), not_lim_zero_const_of_nonzero hq $ by simpa using h
lemma norm_nonneg (f : padic_seq p) : f.norm ≥ 0 :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm]
else by simp [norm, hf, padic_norm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_left_left {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max (stationary_point hf) (max v2 v3))) :=
let i := max (stationary_point hf) (max v2 v3) in
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_max_left },
{ apply le_refl }
end
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_left {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max v1 (max (stationary_point hf) v3))) :=
let i := max v1 (max (stationary_point hf) v3) in
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_trans,
{ apply le_max_left _ v3 },
{ apply le_max_right } },
{ apply le_refl }
end
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_right {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationary_point hf)))) :=
let i := max v1 (max v2 (stationary_point hf)) in
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_trans,
{ apply le_max_right v2 },
{ apply le_max_right } },
{ apply le_refl }
end
end embedding
end padic_seq
section
open padic_seq
private meta def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : interactive.loc := interactive.loc.ns [none]) : tactic unit :=
do [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mmap
(λ n, tactic.mk_app ``stationary_point [n] <|> return n),
e1 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return `(true),
e2 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return `(true),
e3 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return `(true),
sl ← [e1, e2, e3].mfoldl (λ s e, simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk,
when at_.include_goal (tactic.simp_target sl),
hs ← at_.get_locals, hs.mmap' (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/--
This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts padic_norm (f (stationary_point f)) to
padic_norm (f (max _ _ _)).
-/
meta def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic unit :=
do [h, f, g] ← l.mmap tactic.i_to_expr,
index_simp_core h f g at_
end
namespace padic_seq
section embedding
open cau_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [hp : nat.prime p]
include hp
lemma norm_mul (f g : padic_seq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : f * g ≈ 0, from mul_equiv_zero' _ hf,
by simp [hf, hg, norm]
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have hf : f * g ≈ 0, from mul_equiv_zero _ hg,
by simp [hf, hg, norm]
else
have hfg : ¬ f * g ≈ 0, by apply mul_not_equiv_zero; assumption,
begin
unfold norm,
split_ifs,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg],
apply padic_norm.mul
end
lemma eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : padic_seq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
lemma ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : padic_seq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬ f ≈ 0 :=
not_iff_not.2 (eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _)
lemma norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padic_norm p) q) = padic_norm p q :=
if hq : q = 0 then
have (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0,
by simp [hq]; apply setoid.refl (const (padic_norm p) 0),
by subst hq; simp [norm, this]
else
have ¬ (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0, from not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq,
by simp [norm, this]
lemma norm_image (a : padic_seq p) (ha : ¬ a ≈ 0) :
(∃ (n : ℤ), a.norm = ↑p ^ (-n)) :=
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha in
by simpa [hk] using padic_norm.image p hk'
lemma norm_one : norm (1 : padic_seq p) = 1 :=
have h1 : ¬ (1 : padic_seq p) ≈ 0, from one_not_equiv_zero _,
by simp [h1, norm, hp.one_lt]
private lemma norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) ≠ padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)))
(hgt : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) > padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg))) :
false :=
begin
have hpn : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) - padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) > 0,
from sub_pos_of_lt hgt,
cases hfg _ hpn with N hN,
let i := max N (max (stationary_point hf) (stationary_point hg)),
have hi : i ≥ N, from le_max_left _ _,
have hN' := hN _ hi,
padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hgt,
have hpne : padic_norm p (f i) ≠ padic_norm p (-(g i)),
by rwa [ ←padic_norm.neg p (g i)] at h,
let hpnem := add_eq_max_of_ne p hpne,
have hpeq : padic_norm p ((f - g) i) = max (padic_norm p (f i)) (padic_norm p (g i)),
{ rwa padic_norm.neg at hpnem },
rw [hpeq, max_eq_left_of_lt hgt] at hN',
have : padic_norm p (f i) < padic_norm p (f i),
{ apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN', apply sub_le_self, apply padic_norm.nonneg },
exact lt_irrefl _ this
end
private lemma norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) = padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) :=
begin
by_contradiction h,
cases (decidable.em (padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) >
padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg))))
with hgt hngt,
{ exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hgt },
{ apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (setoid.symm hfg) (ne.symm h),
apply lt_of_le_of_ne,
apply le_of_not_gt hngt,
apply h }
end
theorem norm_equiv {f g : padic_seq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : g ≈ 0, from setoid.trans (setoid.symm hfg) hf,
by simp [norm, hf, hg]
else have hg : ¬ g ≈ 0, from hf ∘ setoid.trans hfg,
by unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private lemma norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : padic_seq p}
(hfg : ¬ f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm) :=
begin
unfold norm, split_ifs,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg],
apply padic_norm.nonarchimedean
end
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : padic_seq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm) :=
if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then
have 0 ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm), from le_max_left_of_le (norm_nonneg _),
by simpa [hfg, norm]
else if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g,
{ change lim_zero (f - 0) at hf,
show lim_zero (f + g - g), by simpa using hf },
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm, from norm_equiv hfg',
have hcl : f.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf,
have max (f.norm) (g.norm) = g.norm,
by rw hcl; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _),
by rw [this, hcfg]
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f,
{ change lim_zero (g - 0) at hg,
show lim_zero (f + g - f), by simpa [add_sub_cancel'] using hg },
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm, from norm_equiv hfg',
have hcl : g.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg,
have max (f.norm) (g.norm) = f.norm,
by rw hcl; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _),
by rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
lemma norm_eq {f g : padic_seq p} (h : ∀ k, padic_norm p (f k) = padic_norm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : g ≈ 0, from equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf,
by simp [hf, hg, norm]
else
have hg : ¬ g ≈ 0, from λ hg, hf $ equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero (by simp [h]) hg,
begin
simp [hg, hf, norm],
let i := max (stationary_point hf) (stationary_point hg),
have hpf : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) = padic_norm p (f i),
{ apply stationary_point_spec, apply le_max_left, apply le_refl },
have hpg : padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) = padic_norm p (g i),
{ apply stationary_point_spec, apply le_max_right, apply le_refl },
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
end
lemma norm_neg (a : padic_seq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq $ by simp
lemma norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : padic_seq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm :=
have lim_zero (f + g - 0), from h,
have f ≈ -g, from show lim_zero (f - (-g)), by simpa,
have f.norm = (-g).norm, from norm_equiv this,
by simpa [norm_neg] using this
lemma add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : padic_seq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm :=
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0, from mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne,
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have lim_zero (f - 0), from hf,
have f + g ≈ g, from show lim_zero ((f + g) - g), by simpa,
have h1 : (f+g).norm = g.norm, from norm_equiv this,
have h2 : f.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf,
by rw [h1, h2]; rw max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have lim_zero (g - 0), from hg,
have f + g ≈ f, from show lim_zero ((f + g) - f), by rw [add_sub_cancel']; simpa,
have h1 : (f+g).norm = f.norm, from norm_equiv this,
have h2 : g.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg,
by rw [h1, h2]; rw max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
else
begin
unfold norm at ⊢ hfgne, split_ifs at ⊢ hfgne,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at ⊢ hfgne,
apply padic_norm.add_eq_max_of_ne,
simpa [hf, hg, norm] using hfgne
end
end embedding
end padic_seq
/-- The p-adic numbers `Q_[p]` are the Cauchy completion of `ℚ` with respect to the p-adic norm. -/
def padic (p : ℕ) [nat.prime p] := @cau_seq.completion.Cauchy _ _ _ _ (padic_norm p) _
notation `ℚ_[` p `]` := padic p
namespace padic
section completion
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
/-- The discrete field structure on ℚ_p is inherited from the Cauchy completion construction. -/
instance field : field (ℚ_[p]) :=
cau_seq.completion.field
instance : inhabited ℚ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
-- short circuits
instance : has_zero ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_one ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_add ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_mul ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_sub ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_neg ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_div ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_group ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : comm_ring ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
/-- Builds the equivalence class of a Cauchy sequence of rationals. -/
def mk : padic_seq p → ℚ_[p] := quotient.mk
end completion
section completion
variables (p : ℕ) [nat.prime p]
lemma mk_eq {f g : padic_seq p} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g := quotient.eq
/-- Embeds the rational numbers in the p-adic numbers. -/
def of_rat : ℚ → ℚ_[p] := cau_seq.completion.of_rat
@[simp] lemma of_rat_add : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x + y) = of_rat p x + of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_add
@[simp] lemma of_rat_neg : ∀ (x : ℚ), of_rat p (-x) = -of_rat p x :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_neg
@[simp] lemma of_rat_mul : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x * y) = of_rat p x * of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_mul
@[simp] lemma of_rat_sub : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x - y) = of_rat p x - of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_sub
@[simp] lemma of_rat_div : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x / y) = of_rat p x / of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_div
@[simp] lemma of_rat_one : of_rat p 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_rat_zero : of_rat p 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_of_rat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : (↑n : ℚ_[p]) = of_rat p n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ refl },
{ simpa using ih }
end
-- without short circuits, this needs an increase of class.instance_max_depth
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_of_rat_of_int (n : ℤ) : ↑n = of_rat p n :=
by induction n; simp
lemma cast_eq_of_rat : ∀ (q : ℚ), (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = of_rat p q
| ⟨n, d, h1, h2⟩ :=
show ↑n / ↑d = _, from
have (⟨n, d, h1, h2⟩ : ℚ) = rat.mk n d, from rat.num_denom',
by simp [this, rat.mk_eq_div, of_rat_div]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_add : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x + y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x + ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_neg : ∀ {x : ℚ}, (↑(-x) : ℚ_[p]) = -↑x := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_mul : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x * y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x * ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_sub : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x - y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x - ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_div : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x / y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x / ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[squash_cast] lemma coe_one : (↑1 : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[squash_cast] lemma coe_zero : (↑0 : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
lemma const_equiv {q r : ℚ} : const (padic_norm p) q ≈ const (padic_norm p) r ↔ q = r :=
⟨ λ heq : lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) (q - r)),
eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ const_lim_zero.1 heq,
λ heq, by rw heq; apply setoid.refl _ ⟩
lemma of_rat_eq {q r : ℚ} : of_rat p q = of_rat p r ↔ q = r :=
⟨(const_equiv p).1 ∘ quotient.eq.1, λ h, by rw h⟩
@[elim_cast] lemma coe_inj {q r : ℚ} : (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = ↑r ↔ q = r :=
by simp [cast_eq_of_rat, of_rat_eq]
instance : char_zero ℚ_[p] :=
⟨λ m n, by { rw ← rat.cast_coe_nat, norm_cast, exact id }⟩
end completion
end padic
/-- The rational-valued p-adic norm on ℚ_p is lifted from the norm on Cauchy sequences. The
canonical form of this function is the normed space instance, with notation `∥ ∥`. -/
def padic_norm_e {p : ℕ} [hp : nat.prime p] : ℚ_[p] → ℚ :=
quotient.lift padic_seq.norm $ @padic_seq.norm_equiv _ _
namespace padic_norm_e
section embedding
open padic_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
lemma defn (f : padic_seq p) {ε : ℚ} (hε : ε > 0) : ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (⟦f⟧ - f i) < ε :=
begin
simp only [padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
change ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε,
by_contradiction h,
cases cauchy₂ f hε with N hN,
have : ∀ N, ∃ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm ≥ ε,
by simpa [not_forall] using h,
rcases this N with ⟨i, hi, hge⟩,
have hne : ¬ (f - const (padic_norm p) (f i)) ≈ 0,
{ intro h, unfold padic_seq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge, exact not_lt_of_ge hge hε },
unfold padic_seq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge,
apply not_le_of_gt _ hge,
cases decidable.em ((stationary_point hne) ≥ N) with hgen hngen,
{ apply hN; assumption },
{ have := stationary_point_spec hne (le_refl _) (le_of_not_le hngen),
rw ←this,
apply hN,
apply le_refl, assumption }
end
protected lemma nonneg (q : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e q ≥ 0 :=
quotient.induction_on q $ norm_nonneg
lemma zero_def : (0 : ℚ_[p]) = ⟦0⟧ := rfl
lemma zero_iff (q : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e q = 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
quotient.induction_on q $
by simpa only [zero_def, quotient.eq] using norm_zero_iff
@[simp] protected lemma zero : padic_norm_e (0 : ℚ_[p]) = 0 :=
(zero_iff _).2 rfl
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
@[simp] protected lemma one' : padic_norm_e (1 : ℚ_[p]) = 1 :=
norm_one
@[simp] protected lemma neg (q : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (-q) = padic_norm_e q :=
quotient.induction_on q $ norm_neg
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
theorem nonarchimedean' (q r : ℚ_[p]) :
padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ norm_nonarchimedean
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne' {q r : ℚ_[p]} :
padic_norm_e q ≠ padic_norm_e r → padic_norm_e (q + r) = max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ λ _ _, padic_seq.add_eq_max_of_ne
lemma triangle_ineq (x y z : ℚ_[p]) :
padic_norm_e (x - z) ≤ padic_norm_e (x - y) + padic_norm_e (y - z) :=
calc padic_norm_e (x - z) = padic_norm_e ((x - y) + (y - z)) : by rw sub_add_sub_cancel
... ≤ max (padic_norm_e (x - y)) (padic_norm_e (y - z)) : padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean' _ _
... ≤ padic_norm_e (x - y) + padic_norm_e (y - z) :
max_le_add_of_nonneg (padic_norm_e.nonneg _) (padic_norm_e.nonneg _)
protected lemma add (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ (padic_norm_e q) + (padic_norm_e r) :=
calc
padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) : nonarchimedean' _ _
... ≤ (padic_norm_e q) + (padic_norm_e r) :
max_le_add_of_nonneg (padic_norm_e.nonneg _) (padic_norm_e.nonneg _)
protected lemma mul' (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q * r) = (padic_norm_e q) * (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ norm_mul
instance : is_absolute_value (@padic_norm_e p _) :=
{ abv_nonneg := padic_norm_e.nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := zero_iff,
abv_add := padic_norm_e.add,
abv_mul := padic_norm_e.mul' }
@[simp] lemma eq_padic_norm' (q : ℚ) : padic_norm_e (padic.of_rat p q) = padic_norm p q :=
norm_const _
protected theorem image' {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, padic_norm_e q = p ^ (-n) :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ f hf,
have ¬ f ≈ 0, from (ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf,
norm_image f this
lemma sub_rev (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q - r) = padic_norm_e (r - q) :=
by rw ←(padic_norm_e.neg); simp
end embedding
end padic_norm_e
namespace padic
section complete
open padic_seq padic
theorem rat_dense' {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p] (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℚ} (hε : ε > 0) :
∃ r : ℚ, padic_norm_e (q - r) < ε :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ q',
have ∃ N, ∀ m n ≥ N, padic_norm p (q' m - q' n) < ε, from cauchy₂ _ hε,
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := this in
⟨q' N,
begin
simp only [padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
change padic_seq.norm (q' - const _ (q' N)) < ε,
cases decidable.em ((q' - const (padic_norm p) (q' N)) ≈ 0) with heq hne',
{ simpa only [heq, padic_seq.norm, dif_pos] },
{ simp only [padic_seq.norm, dif_neg hne'],
change padic_norm p (q' _ - q' _) < ε,
have := stationary_point_spec hne',
cases decidable.em (N ≥ stationary_point hne') with hle hle,
{ have := eq.symm (this (le_refl _) hle),
simp at this, simpa [this] },
{ apply hN,
apply le_of_lt, apply lt_of_not_ge, apply hle, apply le_refl }}
end⟩
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p] (f : cau_seq _ (@padic_norm_e p _))
open classical
private lemma div_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : (1 / ((n + 1): ℚ)) > 0 :=
div_pos zero_lt_one (by exact_mod_cast succ_pos _)
def lim_seq : ℕ → ℚ := λ n, classical.some (rat_dense' (f n) (div_nat_pos n))
lemma exi_rat_seq_conv {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (f i - ((lim_seq f) i : ℚ_[p])) < ε :=
begin
refine (exists_nat_gt (1/ε)).imp (λ N hN i hi, _),
have h := classical.some_spec (rat_dense' (f i) (div_nat_pos i)),
refine lt_of_lt_of_le h (div_le_of_le_mul (by exact_mod_cast succ_pos _) _),
rw right_distrib,
apply le_add_of_le_of_nonneg,
{ exact le_mul_of_div_le hε (le_trans (le_of_lt hN) (by exact_mod_cast hi)) },
{ apply le_of_lt, simpa }
end
lemma exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy : is_cau_seq (padic_norm p) (lim_seq f) :=
assume ε hε,
have hε3 : ε / 3 > 0, from div_pos hε (by norm_num),
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f hε3,
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := f.cauchy₂ hε3 in
begin
existsi max N N2,
intros j hj,
suffices : padic_norm_e ((↑(lim_seq f j) - f (max N N2)) + (f (max N N2) - lim_seq f (max N N2))) < ε,
{ ring at this ⊢,
rw [← padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm', ← padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
exact_mod_cast this },
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ have : (3 : ℚ) ≠ 0, by norm_num,
have : ε = ε / 3 + ε / 3 + ε / 3,
{ apply eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left this, simp [left_distrib, mul_div_cancel' _ this ], ring },
rw this,
apply add_lt_add,
{ suffices : padic_norm_e ((↑(lim_seq f j) - f j) + (f j - f (max N N2))) < ε / 3 + ε / 3,
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg],
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ apply add_lt_add,
{ rw [padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
apply_mod_cast hN,
exact le_of_max_le_left hj },
{ apply hN2,
exact le_of_max_le_right hj,
apply le_max_right }}},
{ apply_mod_cast hN,
apply le_max_left }}}
end
private def lim' : padic_seq p := ⟨_, exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy f⟩
private def lim : ℚ_[p] := ⟦lim' f⟧
theorem complete' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (q - f i) < ε :=
⟨ lim f,
λ ε hε,
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f (show ε / 2 > 0, from div_pos hε (by norm_num)),
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := padic_norm_e.defn (lim' f) (show ε / 2 > 0, from div_pos hε (by norm_num)) in
begin
existsi max N N2,
intros i hi,
suffices : padic_norm_e ((lim f - lim' f i) + (lim' f i - f i)) < ε,
{ ring at this; exact this },
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ have : ε = ε / 2 + ε / 2, by rw ←(add_self_div_two ε); simp,
rw this,
apply add_lt_add,
{ apply hN2, exact le_of_max_le_right hi },
{ rw_mod_cast [padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
apply hN,
exact le_of_max_le_left hi }}}
end ⟩
end complete
section normed_space
variables (p : ℕ) [nat.prime p]
instance : has_dist ℚ_[p] := ⟨λ x y, padic_norm_e (x - y)⟩
instance : metric_space ℚ_[p] :=
{ dist_self := by simp [dist],
dist_comm := λ x y, by unfold dist; rw ←padic_norm_e.neg (x - y); simp,
dist_triangle :=
begin
intros, unfold dist,
exact_mod_cast padic_norm_e.triangle_ineq _ _ _,
end,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero :=
begin
unfold dist, intros _ _ h,
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
apply (padic_norm_e.zero_iff _).1,
exact_mod_cast h
end }
instance : has_norm ℚ_[p] := ⟨λ x, padic_norm_e x⟩
instance : normed_field ℚ_[p] :=
{ dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl,
norm_mul' := by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul'] }
instance : is_absolute_value (λ a : ℚ_[p], ∥a∥) :=
{ abv_nonneg := norm_nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := λ _, norm_eq_zero,
abv_add := norm_add_le,
abv_mul := by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul'] }
theorem rat_dense {p : ℕ} {hp : p.prime} (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε > 0) :
∃ r : ℚ, ∥q - r∥ < ε :=
let ⟨ε', hε'l, hε'r⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε,
⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense' q (by simpa using hε'l) in
⟨r, lt.trans (by simpa [has_norm.norm] using hr) hε'r⟩
end normed_space
end padic
namespace padic_norm_e
section normed_space
variables {p : ℕ} [hp : p.prime]
include hp
@[simp] protected lemma mul (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q * r∥ = ∥q∥ * ∥r∥ :=
by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul']
protected lemma is_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ↑(padic_norm_e q) = ∥q∥ := rfl
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q + r∥ ≤ max (∥q∥) (∥r∥) :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
exact_mod_cast nonarchimedean' _ _
end
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℚ_[p]} (h : ∥q∥ ≠ ∥r∥) : ∥q+r∥ = max (∥q∥) (∥r∥) :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
apply_mod_cast add_eq_max_of_ne',
intro h',
apply h,
unfold has_norm.norm,
exact_mod_cast h'
end
@[simp] lemma eq_padic_norm (q : ℚ) : ∥(↑q : ℚ_[p])∥ = padic_norm p q :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
rw [← padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm', ← padic.cast_eq_of_rat]
end
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℚ_[p] :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨padic.of_rat p (p⁻¹), begin
have h0 : p ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (hp.pos),
have h1 : 1 < p := hp.one_lt,
rw [← padic.cast_eq_of_rat, eq_padic_norm],
simp only [padic_norm, inv_eq_zero],
simp only [if_neg] {discharger := `[exact_mod_cast h0]},
norm_cast,
simp only [padic_val_rat.inv] {discharger := `[exact_mod_cast h0]},
rw [neg_neg, padic_val_rat.padic_val_rat_self h1],
erw _root_.pow_one,
exact_mod_cast h1,
end⟩ }
protected theorem image {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, ∥q∥ = ↑((↑p : ℚ) ^ (-n)) :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ f hf,
have ¬ f ≈ 0, from (padic_seq.ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf,
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := padic_seq.norm_image f this in
⟨n, congr_arg rat.cast hn⟩
protected lemma is_rat (q : ℚ_[p]) : ∃ q' : ℚ, ∥q∥ = ↑q' :=
if h : q = 0 then ⟨0, by simp [h]⟩
else let ⟨n, hn⟩ := padic_norm_e.image h in ⟨_, hn⟩
def rat_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ℚ := classical.some (padic_norm_e.is_rat q)
lemma eq_rat_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q∥ = rat_norm q := classical.some_spec (padic_norm_e.is_rat q)
theorem norm_rat_le_one : ∀ {q : ℚ} (hq : ¬ p ∣ q.denom), ∥(q : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1
| ⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ := λ hq : ¬ p ∣ d,
if hnz : n = 0 then
have (⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ : ℚ) = 0,
from rat.zero_iff_num_zero.mpr hnz,
by norm_num [this]
else
begin
have hnz' : {rat . num := n, denom := d, pos := hn, cop := hd} ≠ 0, from mt rat.zero_iff_num_zero.1 hnz,
rw [padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm],
norm_cast,
rw [padic_norm.eq_fpow_of_nonzero p hnz', padic_val_rat_def p hnz'],
have h : (multiplicity p d).get _ = 0, by simp [multiplicity_eq_zero_of_not_dvd, hq],
rw_mod_cast [h, sub_zero],
apply fpow_le_one_of_nonpos,
{ exact_mod_cast le_of_lt hp.one_lt, },
{ apply neg_nonpos_of_nonneg, norm_cast, simp, }
end
lemma eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {p : ℕ} {hp : p.prime} {z1 z2 : ℚ_[p]}
(h : ∥z1 + z2∥ < ∥z2∥) : ∥z1∥ = ∥z2∥ :=
by_contradiction $ λ hne,
not_lt_of_ge (by rw padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne hne; apply le_max_right) h
lemma eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {p : ℕ} {hp : p.prime} {z1 z2 : ℚ_[p]}
(h : ∥z1 + z2∥ < ∥z1∥) : ∥z1∥ = ∥z2∥ :=
by_contradiction $ λ hne,
not_lt_of_ge (by rw padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne hne; apply le_max_left) h
end normed_space
end padic_norm_e
namespace padic
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
set_option eqn_compiler.zeta true
instance complete : cau_seq.is_complete ℚ_[p] norm :=
begin
split, intro f,
have cau_seq_norm_e : is_cau_seq padic_norm_e f,
{ intros ε hε,
let h := is_cau f ε (by exact_mod_cast hε),
unfold norm at h,
apply_mod_cast h },
cases padic.complete' ⟨f, cau_seq_norm_e⟩ with q hq,
existsi q,
intros ε hε,
cases exists_rat_btwn hε with ε' hε',
norm_cast at hε',
cases hq ε' hε'.1 with N hN, existsi N,
intros i hi, let h := hN i hi,
unfold norm,
rw_mod_cast [cau_seq.sub_apply, padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
refine lt.trans _ hε'.2,
exact_mod_cast hN i hi
end
lemma padic_norm_e_lim_le {f : cau_seq ℚ_[p] norm} {a : ℝ} (ha : a > 0)
(hf : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ a) : ∥f.lim∥ ≤ a :=
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := setoid.symm (cau_seq.equiv_lim f) _ ha in
calc ∥f.lim∥ = ∥f.lim - f N + f N∥ : by simp
... ≤ max (∥f.lim - f N∥) (∥f N∥) : padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean _ _
... ≤ a : max_le (le_of_lt (hN _ (le_refl _))) (hf _)
end padic
|
a60274dcb81ef2337c2fb0aade0e3de65d856acf | a721fe7446524f18ba361625fc01033d9c8b7a78 | /src/principia/mynat/square.lean | 32030583d3e1ac18d652565cf9f12515f952b7c8 | [] | no_license | Sterrs/leaning | 8fd80d1f0a6117a220bb2e57ece639b9a63deadc | 3901cc953694b33adda86cb88ca30ba99594db31 | refs/heads/master | 1,627,023,822,744 | 1,616,515,221,000 | 1,616,515,221,000 | 245,512,190 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,616,429,050,000 | 1,583,527,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,169 | lean | -- vim: ts=2 sw=0 sts=-1 et ai tw=70
import .prime
namespace hidden
namespace mynat
def square (m : mynat) := ∃ k : mynat, m = k * k
variables {m n p k : mynat}
theorem square_closed_mul:
square m → square n → square (m * n) :=
begin
assume hm hn,
cases hm with a ha,
cases hn with b hb,
existsi a * b,
rw [ha, hb],
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_assoc a,
mul_assoc b, mul_comm b a],
simp,
end
theorem square_imp_not_prime {m : mynat}:
square m → ¬(prime m) :=
begin
assume hs hp,
cases hp with h1 hp,
cases hs with a ha,
have ham : a ∣ m,
rw ha,
apply dvd_mul, refl,
have hor := hp a ham,
cases hor with hm1 hmeq,
rw [hm1, mul_one] at ha,
contradiction,
rw [←mul_one m, hmeq] at ha,
have : m ≠ 0,
assume hm0,
have h2 := hp 2,
rw hm0 at h2,
have := h2 dvd_zero,
cases this, cases this, cases this,
have := mul_cancel this ha,
have : m = 1,
symmetry, assumption,
contradiction,
end
theorem sqrt_2_not_nat: ¬m * m = 2 :=
begin
assume h,
have hs : square 2,
existsi m, symmetry, assumption,
from (square_imp_not_prime hs) two_prime,
end
end mynat
end hidden
|
6bd88c75625cd15f3c171d2d55ac9d5b91dd5f45 | 31f556cdeb9239ffc2fad8f905e33987ff4feab9 | /src/Lean/Elab/MacroArgUtil.lean | 1b84aeaac148d0a19998462a19e5394bb978a20e | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | tobiasgrosser/lean4 | ce0fd9cca0feba1100656679bf41f0bffdbabb71 | ebdbdc10436a4d9d6b66acf78aae7a23f5bd073f | refs/heads/master | 1,673,103,412,948 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 186,870,185 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,665,129,237,000 | 1,557,939,901,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,038 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Elab.Syntax
namespace Lean.Elab.Command
open Lean.Syntax
open Lean.Parser.Term hiding macroArg
open Lean.Parser.Command
/-- Convert `macro` arg into a `syntax` command item and a pattern element -/
partial def expandMacroArg (stx : TSyntax ``macroArg) : CommandElabM (TSyntax `stx × Term) := do
let (id?, id, stx) ← match (← liftMacroM <| expandMacros stx) with
| `(macroArg| $id:ident:$stx) => pure (some id, (id : Term), stx)
| `(macroArg| $stx:stx) => pure (none, (← `(x)), stx)
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
mkSyntaxAndPat id? id stx
where
mkSyntaxAndPat (id? : Option Ident) (id : Term) (stx : TSyntax `stx) := do
let pat ← match stx with
| `(stx| $s:str)
| `(stx| &$s:str) => pure ⟨mkNode `token_antiquot #[← liftMacroM <| strLitToPattern s, mkAtom "%", mkAtom "$", id]⟩
| `(stx| optional($stx)) => mkSplicePat `optional stx id "?"
| `(stx| many($stx))
| `(stx| many1($stx)) => mkSplicePat `many stx id "*"
| `(stx| sepBy($stx, $sep:str $[, $stxsep]? $[, allowTrailingSep]?))
| `(stx| sepBy1($stx, $sep:str $[, $stxsep]? $[, allowTrailingSep]?)) =>
mkSplicePat `sepBy stx id ((isStrLit? sep).get! ++ "*")
-- NOTE: all `interpolatedStr(·)` reuse the same node kind
| `(stx| interpolatedStr(term)) => pure ⟨Syntax.mkAntiquotNode interpolatedStrKind id⟩
-- bind through withPosition
| `(stx| withPosition($stx)) =>
let (stx, pat) ← mkSyntaxAndPat id? id stx
let stx ← `(stx| withPosition($stx))
return (stx, pat)
| _ => match id? with
-- if there is a binding, we assume the user knows what they are doing
| some id => mkAntiquotNode stx id
-- otherwise `group` the syntax to enforce arity 1, e.g. for `noWs`
| none => return (← `(stx| group($stx)), (← mkAntiquotNode stx id))
pure (stx, pat)
mkSplicePat (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (stx : TSyntax `stx) (id : Term) (suffix : String) : CommandElabM Term :=
return ⟨mkNullNode #[mkAntiquotSuffixSpliceNode kind (← mkAntiquotNode stx id) suffix]⟩
mkAntiquotNode : TSyntax `stx → Term → CommandElabM Term
| `(stx| $id:ident$[:$_]?), term => do
let kind ← match (← Elab.Term.resolveParserName id) with
| [(`Lean.Parser.ident, _)] => pure identKind
| [(`Lean.Parser.Term.ident, _)] => pure identKind
| [(`Lean.Parser.strLit, _)] => pure strLitKind
-- a syntax abbrev, assume kind == decl name
| [(c, _)] => pure c
| cs@(_ :: _ :: _) => throwError "ambiguous parser declaration {cs.map (·.1)}"
| [] =>
let id := id.getId.eraseMacroScopes
if Parser.isParserCategory (← getEnv) id then
return ⟨Syntax.mkAntiquotNode id term (isPseudoKind := true)⟩
else if (← Parser.isParserAlias id) then
pure <| (← Parser.getSyntaxKindOfParserAlias? id).getD Name.anonymous
else
throwError "unknown parser declaration/category/alias '{id}'"
pure ⟨Syntax.mkAntiquotNode kind term⟩
| stx, term => do
-- can't match against `` `(stx| ($stxs*)) `` as `*` is interpreted as the `stx` operator
if stx.raw.isOfKind ``Parser.Syntax.paren then
-- translate argument `v:(p1 ... pn)` where all but one `pi` produce zero nodes to
-- `v:pi` using that single `pi`
let nonNullaryNodes ← stx.raw[1].getArgs.filterM fun
| `(stx| $id:ident$[:$_]?) | `(stx| $id:ident($_)) => do
let info ← Parser.getParserAliasInfo id.getId
return info.stackSz? != some 0
| _ => return true
if let #[stx] := nonNullaryNodes then
return (← mkAntiquotNode ⟨stx⟩ term)
pure ⟨Syntax.mkAntiquotNode Name.anonymous term (isPseudoKind := true)⟩
end Lean.Elab.Command
|
dd8b452040a33bad5b741dff19824d73d3b27263 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/blast_ematch8.lean | 84f2053debbe2a6da23bab657698273ffdafee81 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,452 | lean | import algebra.group
open algebra
variables {A : Type}
variables [s : group A]
include s
namespace foo
set_option blast.strategy "ematch"
attribute inv_inv mul.left_inv mul.assoc one_mul mul_one [forward]
theorem mul.right_inv (a : A) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
calc
a * a⁻¹ = (a⁻¹)⁻¹ * a⁻¹ : by blast
... = 1 : by blast
theorem mul.right_inv₂ (a : A) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
by blast
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left (a b : A) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
calc
a * (a⁻¹ * b) = a * a⁻¹ * b : by blast
... = 1 * b : by blast
... = b : by blast
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left₂ (a b : A) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
by blast
theorem mul_inv (a b : A) : (a * b)⁻¹ = b⁻¹ * a⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one
(calc
a * b * (b⁻¹ * a⁻¹) = a * (b * (b⁻¹ * a⁻¹)) : by blast
... = 1 : by blast)
theorem eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one {a b : A} (H : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b :=
calc
a = a * b⁻¹ * b : by blast
... = 1 * b : by blast
... = b : by blast
-- This is another theorem that can be easily proved using superposition,
-- but cannot to be proved using E-matching.
-- To prove it using E-matching, we must provide the following auxiliary step using calc.
theorem eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one₂ {a b : A} (H : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b :=
calc
a = a * b⁻¹ * b : by blast
... = b : by blast
end foo
|
b2c48c107226105e034f9e69d3d5c6f0e69b0197 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/tactic/linarith/preprocessing.lean | a368a3c9861abe086a7c60007c9809a94fba66b2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,447 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import tactic.linarith.datatypes
import tactic.zify
import tactic.cancel_denoms
import order.lexicographic
/-!
# Linarith preprocessing
This file contains methods used to preprocess inputs to `linarith`.
In particular, `linarith` works over comparisons of the form `t R 0`, where `R ∈ {<,≤,=}`.
It assumes that expressions in `t` have integer coefficients and that the type of `t` has
well-behaved subtraction.
## Implementation details
A `global_preprocessor` is a function `list expr → tactic(list expr)`. Users can add custom
preprocessing steps by adding them to the `linarith_config` object. `linarith.default_preprocessors`
is the main list, and generally none of these should be skipped unless you know what you're doing.
-/
open native tactic expr
namespace linarith
/-! ### Preprocessing -/
open tactic
set_option eqn_compiler.max_steps 50000
/--
If `prf` is a proof of `¬ e`, where `e` is a comparison,
`rem_neg prf e` flips the comparison in `e` and returns a proof.
For example, if `prf : ¬ a < b`, ``rem_neg prf `(a < b)`` returns a proof of `a ≥ b`.
-/
meta def rem_neg (prf : expr) : expr → tactic expr
| `(_ ≤ _) := mk_app ``lt_of_not_ge [prf]
| `(_ < _) := mk_app ``le_of_not_gt [prf]
| `(_ > _) := mk_app ``le_of_not_gt [prf]
| `(_ ≥ _) := mk_app ``lt_of_not_ge [prf]
| e := failed
private meta def rearr_comp_aux : expr → expr → tactic expr
| prf `(%%a ≤ 0) := return prf
| prf `(%%a < 0) := return prf
| prf `(%%a = 0) := return prf
| prf `(%%a ≥ 0) := mk_app ``neg_nonpos_of_nonneg [prf]
| prf `(%%a > 0) := mk_app `neg_neg_of_pos [prf]
| prf `(0 ≥ %%a) := to_expr ``(id_rhs (%%a ≤ 0) %%prf)
| prf `(0 > %%a) := to_expr ``(id_rhs (%%a < 0) %%prf)
| prf `(0 = %%a) := mk_app `eq.symm [prf]
| prf `(0 ≤ %%a) := mk_app ``neg_nonpos_of_nonneg [prf]
| prf `(0 < %%a) := mk_app `neg_neg_of_pos [prf]
| prf `(%%a ≤ %%b) := mk_app ``sub_nonpos_of_le [prf]
| prf `(%%a < %%b) := mk_app `sub_neg_of_lt [prf]
| prf `(%%a = %%b) := mk_app `sub_eq_zero_of_eq [prf]
| prf `(%%a > %%b) := mk_app `sub_neg_of_lt [prf]
| prf `(%%a ≥ %%b) := mk_app ``sub_nonpos_of_le [prf]
| prf `(¬ %%t) := do nprf ← rem_neg prf t, tp ← infer_type nprf, rearr_comp_aux nprf tp
| prf a := trace a >> fail "couldn't rearrange comp"
/--
`rearr_comp e` takes a proof `e` of an equality, inequality, or negation thereof,
and turns it into a proof of a comparison `_ R 0`, where `R ∈ {=, ≤, <}`.
-/
meta def rearr_comp (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
infer_type e >>= rearr_comp_aux e
/-- If `e` is of the form `((n : ℕ) : ℤ)`, `is_nat_int_coe e` returns `n : ℕ`. -/
meta def is_nat_int_coe : expr → option expr
| `(@coe ℕ ℤ %%_ %%n) := some n
| _ := none
/-- If `e : ℕ`, returns a proof of `0 ≤ (e : ℤ)`. -/
meta def mk_coe_nat_nonneg_prf (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
mk_app `int.coe_nat_nonneg [e]
/-- `get_nat_comps e` returns a list of all subexpressions of `e` of the form `((t : ℕ) : ℤ)`. -/
meta def get_nat_comps : expr → list expr
| `(%%a + %%b) := (get_nat_comps a).append (get_nat_comps b)
| `(%%a * %%b) := (get_nat_comps a).append (get_nat_comps b)
| e := match is_nat_int_coe e with
| some e' := [e']
| none := []
end
/--
If `pf` is a proof of a strict inequality `(a : ℤ) < b`,
`mk_non_strict_int_pf_of_strict_int_pf pf` returns a proof of `a + 1 ≤ b`,
and similarly if `pf` proves a negated weak inequality.
-/
meta def mk_non_strict_int_pf_of_strict_int_pf (pf : expr) : tactic expr :=
do tp ← infer_type pf,
match tp with
| `(%%a < %%b) := to_expr ``(int.add_one_le_iff.mpr %%pf)
| `(%%a > %%b) := to_expr ``(int.add_one_le_iff.mpr %%pf)
| `(¬ %%a ≤ %%b) := to_expr ``(int.add_one_le_iff.mpr (le_of_not_gt %%pf))
| `(¬ %%a ≥ %%b) := to_expr ``(int.add_one_le_iff.mpr (le_of_not_gt %%pf))
| _ := fail "mk_non_strict_int_pf_of_strict_int_pf failed: proof is not an inequality"
end
/--
`is_nat_prop tp` is true iff `tp` is an inequality or equality between natural numbers
or the negation thereof.
-/
meta def is_nat_prop : expr → bool
| `(@eq ℕ %%_ _) := tt
| `(@has_le.le ℕ %%_ _ _) := tt
| `(@has_lt.lt ℕ %%_ _ _) := tt
| `(@ge ℕ %%_ _ _) := tt
| `(@gt ℕ %%_ _ _) := tt
| `(¬ %%p) := is_nat_prop p
| _ := ff
/--
`is_strict_int_prop tp` is true iff `tp` is a strict inequality between integers
or the negation of a weak inequality between integers.
-/
meta def is_strict_int_prop : expr → bool
| `(@has_lt.lt ℤ %%_ _ _) := tt
| `(@gt ℤ %%_ _ _) := tt
| `(¬ @has_le.le ℤ %%_ _ _) := tt
| `(¬ @ge ℤ %%_ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
private meta def filter_comparisons_aux : expr → bool
| `(¬ %%p) := p.app_symbol_in [`has_lt.lt, `has_le.le, `gt, `ge]
| tp := tp.app_symbol_in [`has_lt.lt, `has_le.le, `gt, `ge, `eq]
/--
Removes any expressions that are not proofs of inequalities, equalities, or negations thereof.
-/
meta def filter_comparisons : preprocessor :=
{ name := "filter terms that are not proofs of comparisons",
transform := λ h,
(do tp ← infer_type h,
is_prop tp >>= guardb,
guardb (filter_comparisons_aux tp),
return [h])
<|> return [] }
/--
Replaces proofs of negations of comparisons with proofs of the reversed comparisons.
For example, a proof of `¬ a < b` will become a proof of `a ≥ b`.
-/
meta def remove_negations : preprocessor :=
{ name := "replace negations of comparisons",
transform := λ h,
do tp ← infer_type h,
match tp with
| `(¬ %%p) := singleton <$> rem_neg h p
| _ := return [h]
end }
/--
If `h` is an equality or inequality between natural numbers,
`nat_to_int` lifts this inequality to the integers.
It also adds the facts that the integers involved are nonnegative.
To avoid adding the same nonnegativity facts many times, it is a global preprocessor.
-/
meta def nat_to_int : global_preprocessor :=
{ name := "move nats to ints",
transform := λ l,
-- we lock the tactic state here because a `simplify` call inside of
-- `zify_proof` corrupts the tactic state when run under `io.run_tactic`.
do l ← lock_tactic_state $ l.mmap $ λ h,
infer_type h >>= guardb ∘ is_nat_prop >> zify_proof [] h <|> return h,
nonnegs ← l.mfoldl (λ (es : expr_set) h, do
(a, b) ← infer_type h >>= get_rel_sides,
return $ (es.insert_list (get_nat_comps a)).insert_list (get_nat_comps b)) mk_rb_set,
(++) l <$> nonnegs.to_list.mmap mk_coe_nat_nonneg_prf }
/-- `strengthen_strict_int h` turns a proof `h` of a strict integer inequality `t1 < t2`
into a proof of `t1 ≤ t2 + 1`. -/
meta def strengthen_strict_int : preprocessor :=
{ name := "strengthen strict inequalities over int",
transform := λ h,
do tp ← infer_type h,
guardb (is_strict_int_prop tp) >> singleton <$> mk_non_strict_int_pf_of_strict_int_pf h
<|> return [h] }
/--
`mk_comp_with_zero h` takes a proof `h` of an equality, inequality, or negation thereof,
and turns it into a proof of a comparison `_ R 0`, where `R ∈ {=, ≤, <}`.
-/
meta def make_comp_with_zero : preprocessor :=
{ name := "make comparisons with zero",
transform := λ e, singleton <$> rearr_comp e <|> return [] }
/--
`normalize_denominators_in_lhs h lhs` assumes that `h` is a proof of `lhs R 0`.
It creates a proof of `lhs' R 0`, where all numeric division in `lhs` has been cancelled.
-/
meta def normalize_denominators_in_lhs (h lhs : expr) : tactic expr :=
do (v, lhs') ← cancel_factors.derive lhs,
if v = 1 then return h else do
(ih, h'') ← mk_single_comp_zero_pf v h,
(_, nep, _) ← infer_type h'' >>= rewrite_core lhs',
mk_eq_mp nep h''
/--
`cancel_denoms pf` assumes `pf` is a proof of `t R 0`. If `t` contains the division symbol `/`,
it tries to scale `t` to cancel out division by numerals.
-/
meta def cancel_denoms : preprocessor :=
{ name := "cancel denominators",
transform := λ pf,
(do some (_, lhs) ← parse_into_comp_and_expr <$> infer_type pf,
guardb $ lhs.contains_constant (= `has_div.div),
singleton <$> normalize_denominators_in_lhs pf lhs)
<|> return [pf] }
/--
`find_squares m e` collects all terms of the form `a ^ 2` and `a * a` that appear in `e`
and adds them to the set `m`.
A pair `(a, tt)` is added to `m` when `a^2` appears in `e`, and `(a, ff)` is added to `m`
when `a*a` appears in `e`. -/
meta def find_squares : rb_set (expr × bool) → expr → tactic (rb_set (lex expr bool))
| s `(%%a ^ 2) := do s ← find_squares s a, return (s.insert (a, tt))
| s e@`(%%e1 * %%e2) := if e1 = e2 then do s ← find_squares s e1, return (s.insert (e1, ff)) else
e.mfoldl find_squares s
| s e := e.mfoldl find_squares s
/--
`nlinarith_extras` is the preprocessor corresponding to the `nlinarith` tactic.
* For every term `t` such that `t^2` or `t*t` appears in the input, adds a proof of `t^2 ≥ 0`
or `t*t ≥ 0`.
* For every pair of comparisons `t1 R1 0` and `t2 R2 0`, adds a proof of `t1*t2 R 0`.
This preprocessor is typically run last, after all inputs have been canonized.
-/
meta def nlinarith_extras : global_preprocessor :=
{ name := "nonlinear arithmetic extras",
transform := λ ls,
do s ← ls.mfoldr (λ h s', infer_type h >>= find_squares s') mk_rb_set,
new_es ← s.mfold ([] : list expr) $ λ ⟨e, is_sq⟩ new_es,
((do p ← mk_app (if is_sq then ``sq_nonneg else ``mul_self_nonneg) [e],
return $ p::new_es) <|> return new_es),
new_es ← make_comp_with_zero.globalize.transform new_es,
linarith_trace "nlinarith preprocessing found squares",
linarith_trace s,
linarith_trace_proofs "so we added proofs" new_es,
with_comps ← (new_es ++ ls).mmap (λ e, do
tp ← infer_type e,
return $ (parse_into_comp_and_expr tp).elim (ineq.lt, e) (λ ⟨ine, _⟩, (ine, e))),
products ← with_comps.mmap_upper_triangle $ λ ⟨posa, a⟩ ⟨posb, b⟩,
some <$> match posa, posb with
| ineq.eq, _ := mk_app ``zero_mul_eq [a, b]
| _, ineq.eq := mk_app ``mul_zero_eq [a, b]
| ineq.lt, ineq.lt := mk_app ``mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg [a, b]
| ineq.lt, ineq.le := do a ← mk_app ``le_of_lt [a],
mk_app ``mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos [a, b]
| ineq.le, ineq.lt := do b ← mk_app ``le_of_lt [b],
mk_app ``mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos [a, b]
| ineq.le, ineq.le := mk_app ``mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos [a, b]
end <|> return none,
products ← make_comp_with_zero.globalize.transform products.reduce_option,
return $ new_es ++ ls ++ products }
/--
`remove_ne_aux` case splits on any proof `h : a ≠ b` in the input, turning it into `a < b ∨ a > b`.
This produces `2^n` branches when there are `n` such hypotheses in the input.
-/
meta def remove_ne_aux : list expr → tactic (list branch) :=
λ hs,
(do e ← hs.mfind (λ e : expr, do e ← infer_type e, guard $ e.is_ne.is_some),
[(_, ng1), (_, ng2)] ← to_expr ``(or.elim (lt_or_gt_of_ne %%e)) >>= apply,
let do_goal : expr → tactic (list branch) := λ g,
do set_goals [g],
h ← intro1,
ls ← remove_ne_aux $ hs.remove_all [e],
return $ ls.map (λ b : branch, (b.1, h::b.2)) in
(++) <$> do_goal ng1 <*> do_goal ng2)
<|> do g ← get_goal, return [(g, hs)]
/--
`remove_ne` case splits on any proof `h : a ≠ b` in the input, turning it into `a < b ∨ a > b`,
by calling `linarith.remove_ne_aux`.
This produces `2^n` branches when there are `n` such hypotheses in the input.
-/
meta def remove_ne : global_branching_preprocessor :=
{ name := "remove_ne",
transform := remove_ne_aux }
/--
The default list of preprocessors, in the order they should typically run.
-/
meta def default_preprocessors : list global_branching_preprocessor :=
[filter_comparisons, remove_negations, nat_to_int, strengthen_strict_int,
make_comp_with_zero, cancel_denoms]
/--
`preprocess pps l` takes a list `l` of proofs of propositions.
It maps each preprocessor `pp ∈ pps` over this list.
The preprocessors are run sequentially: each recieves the output of the previous one.
Note that a preprocessor may produce multiple or no expressions from each input expression,
so the size of the list may change.
-/
meta def preprocess (pps : list global_branching_preprocessor) (l : list expr) :
tactic (list branch) :=
do g ← get_goal,
pps.mfoldl (λ ls pp,
list.join <$> (ls.mmap $ λ b, set_goals [b.1] >> pp.process b.2))
[(g, l)]
end linarith
|
7923ce1c1560dd49f9fdc1e6e13938c06b4e2d9b | 94637389e03c919023691dcd05bd4411b1034aa5 | /src/inClassNotes/typeclasses/algebra.lean | 6cbbdfbf2c83fb2a8a7a45f886b221022fc2c121 | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/complogic-s21 | 7c4eef2105abad899e46502270d9829d913e8afc | 99039501b770248c8ceb39890be5dfe129dc1082 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,985,669,944 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 335,706,272 | 0 | 38 | null | 1,618,325,669,000 | 1,612,374,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,391 | lean | /-
Using typeclasses to formalize basic algebraic structures,
including notably the "rules" defining such structures.
-/
namespace alg
universe u
/-
Typeclasses extends hierarchy modeling algebraic hierarchy
-/
@[class]
structure has_zero (α : Type u) :=
(zero : α)
@[class]
structure has_one (α : Type u) :=
(one : α)
/-
A groupoid is a set with a binary operator. The only consraint
is that the set must be closed under the given binary operator.
Note: there are other definitions of groupoid in mathematics. A
groupoid is also sometimes called a magma. Here, the set is given
by the type, α, and the operator by the field, *mul*.
-/
@[class]
structure mul_groupoid (α : Type u) :=
(mul : α → α → α)
@[class]
structure add_groupoid (α : Type u) := -- aka mul_groupoid or magma
(add : α → α → α) -- mul must be total (closed)
/-
A semigroup is a groupoid in which the operator is *associative*
-/
@[class]
structure mul_semigroup (α : Type u) extends mul_groupoid α :=
(assoc : ∀ (a b c : α), mul a (mul b c) = mul (mul a b) c)
@[class]
structure add_semigroup (α : Type u) extends add_groupoid α :=
(assoc : ∀ (a b c_1 : α), add a (add b c_1) = add (add a b) c_1)
/-
A monoid is a semigroup with an identity element
-/
@[class]
structure mul_monoid (α : Type u) extends mul_semigroup α, has_one α :=
(ident_left : ∀ (a : α), mul one a = a)
(ident_right: ∀ (a: α), mul a one = a)
@[class]
structure add_monoid (α : Type u) extends add_semigroup α, has_zero α :=
(ident_left : ∀ (a : α), add zero a = a)
(ident_right: ∀ (a: α), add a zero = a)
/-
A group is a mul_monoid in which every element has an inverse
-/
@[class]
structure mul_group (α : Type u) extends mul_monoid α :=
(left_inv : ∀ (a : α), ∃ (i : α), mul i a = one )
(right_inv : ∀ (a : α), ∃ (i : α), mul a i = one )
@[class]
structure add_group (α : Type u) extends add_monoid α :=
(left_ident : ∀ (a : α), ∃ (i : α), add i a = zero )
(right_ident : ∀ (a : α), ∃ (i : α), add a i = zero )
/-
A group is commutative, or abelian, if its operator is commutative.
-/
@[class]
structure mul_comm_group (α : Type u) extends mul_group α :=
(comm : ∀ (a b : α), mul a b = mul b a )
@[class]
structure add_comm_group (α : Type u) extends add_group α :=
(comm : ∀ (a b : α), add a b = add b a )
set_option old_structure_cmd true
class has_ring (α : Type u)
extends alg.add_comm_group α, mul_monoid α :=
(dist_left : ∀ (a b c : α),
mul_groupoid.mul a (add_groupoid.add b c) =
add_groupoid.add (mul_groupoid.mul a b) (mul_groupoid.mul a c))
(dist_right : ∀ (a b c : α),
mul_groupoid.mul (add_groupoid.add b c) a =
add_groupoid.add (mul_groupoid.mul b a) (mul_groupoid.mul c a))
class has_module (α β : Type) extends has_ring α, add_group β :=
(add_comm : ∀ (b1 b2 : β), add_groupoid.add b1 b2 = add_groupoid.add b2 b1)
(scale : α → β → β)
(rule1: ∀ (a1 a2 : α) (b : β), scale (mul_groupoid.mul a1 a2) b = scale a1 (scale a2 b) )
(rule2: ∀ (a : α) (b1 b2 : β), scale a (add_groupoid.add b1 b2) = add_groupoid.add (scale a b1) (scale a b2))
-- class vector_space
/-
You can keep going to define a whole hierarchy of algebraic
abstractions, and indeed all of these constructs and many more
are already defined in Leans math library.
-- Ring
-- Field
-- Module
-- Vector space
-- etc.
-/
/-
Typeclass instances for nat. Note that we are "stubbing out"
proofs that our objects actually follow the rules. We will
come back to fill in proofs once we know how to do that. It
will be soon.
-/
instance has_one_nat : has_one nat := ⟨ 1 ⟩
instance mul_groupoid_nat : mul_groupoid nat := ⟨ nat.mul ⟩
instance mul_semigroup_nat : mul_semigroup nat := ⟨ _ ⟩
instance mul_monoid_nat : mul_monoid nat := ⟨ _ , _ ⟩
instance has_zero_nat : has_zero nat := ⟨ 0 ⟩
instance add_groupoid_nat : add_groupoid nat := ⟨ nat.add ⟩
instance add_semigroup_nat : add_semigroup nat := ⟨ _ ⟩
instance add_monoid_nat : add_monoid nat := ⟨ _ , _ ⟩
-- instance mul_group_nat : mul_group nat := ⟨ _, _ ⟩
/-
ℕ isn't a group under either add or mul! No inverses.
ℤ is an additive group but not a multiplicative group.
ℚ is an additive group; ℚ-{0} is a multiplicative group.
ℚ is thus a field. ℝ is a field in the same way. So is ℂ.
-/
/-
So what good can all of this be? Here's one application.
We've noted that arguments to foldr can be inconsistent. The
wrong identity element can be passed for the given operator.
-/
def foldr {α : Type} : (α → α → α) → α → list α → α
| f id [] := id
| f id (h::t) := f h (foldr f id t)
#eval foldr nat.mul 0 [1,2,3,4,5] -- oops!
/-
A better foldr takes a "certified" monoid as an argument.
A monoid bundles an operator with its identity element, so
they can't get out of synch. By "certified,"" we mean that
an object comes with a rock solid proof of correctness. In
this case, we'd really want to fill a proof that a putative
monoid instance has an identity element that is proven to
be a left and a right identity for the given operator. We
don't know quite yet how to give these proofs, but that's
the idea.
Here are implementations of foldr taking multiplicative and
additive monoids as arguments. Note that the code is written
to depend only on the definitions of the relevant typeclasses.
You can thus use this fold to reduce lists of values of any
type as long as that type provides an implementation of the
monoid typeclass.
NB: typeclass instances should almost always be anonymous.
For exaple, write [mul_monoid α] instead of [m : mul_monoid α].
Lean does NOT support dot notation for typeclass instances.
Look carefully below: Lean infers an instance of mul_monoid.
That instance in turn extends has_one and mul_semigroup. The
latter extends mul_groupoid (formerly, and in Lean, has_mul).
To get at the mul function of the monoid that we need here,
we refer to it through the typeclass, up the inheritance
hierarchy, that defines it directly: here, mul_groupoid.
-/
def mul_monoid_foldr
{α : Type u}
[mul_monoid α]
:
list α → α
| [] := has_one.one
| (h::t) := mul_groupoid.mul h (mul_monoid_foldr t)
-- Additive version of the same foldr function.
def add_monoid_foldr
{α : Type u}
[add_monoid α]
:
list α → α
| [] := has_zero.zero
| (h::t) := add_groupoid.add h (add_monoid_foldr t)
#eval mul_monoid_foldr [1,2,3,4,5]
#eval add_monoid_foldr [1,2,3,4,5] -- missing instance above
/-
The group, D4.
-/
inductive dihedral_4 : Type
| r0 -- 0 quarter turns r: rotation
| r1 -- 1 quarter turn
| r2 -- 2 quarter turns
| r3 -- 3 quarter turns
| sr0 -- flip horizontal s: reflection
| sr1 -- flip ne/sw
| sr2 -- flip vertical
| sr3 -- flip nw/se
open dihedral_4
def e := r0
def d4_mul :
dihedral_4 → dihedral_4 → dihedral_4 -- closed
:=
_
/-
r^n is still a rotation
sr^n and r^ns are reflections
-/
instance d4_has_one : has_one dihedral_4 := ⟨ e ⟩
instance d4_has_groupoid : mul_groupoid dihedral_4 := ⟨ d4_mul ⟩
instance d4_has_semigroup : mul_semigroup dihedral_4 := ⟨ sorry ⟩
instance d4_has_monoid : mul_monoid dihedral_4 := ⟨ sorry, sorry ⟩
#reduce mul_monoid_foldr [r3, r1, sr3, r2]
end alg
|
943c41b2e5852131505665cd190a0f38fd68e149 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Init/Data/String/Basic.lean | 12363c31117ffae245f2b60c30bc668ae357469b | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,876 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.List.Basic
import Init.Data.Char.Basic
import Init.Data.Option.Basic
universe u
def List.asString (s : List Char) : String :=
⟨s⟩
namespace String
instance : OfNat String.Pos (nat_lit 0) where
ofNat := {}
instance : LT String :=
⟨fun s₁ s₂ => s₁.data < s₂.data⟩
@[extern "lean_string_dec_lt"]
instance decLt (s₁ s₂ : @& String) : Decidable (s₁ < s₂) :=
List.hasDecidableLt s₁.data s₂.data
@[extern "lean_string_length"]
def length : (@& String) → Nat
| ⟨s⟩ => s.length
/-- The internal implementation uses dynamic arrays and will perform destructive updates
if the String is not shared. -/
@[extern "lean_string_push"]
def push : String → Char → String
| ⟨s⟩, c => ⟨s ++ [c]⟩
/-- The internal implementation uses dynamic arrays and will perform destructive updates
if the String is not shared. -/
@[extern "lean_string_append"]
def append : String → (@& String) → String
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a ++ b⟩
/-- O(n) in the runtime, where n is the length of the String -/
def toList (s : String) : List Char :=
s.data
def utf8GetAux : List Char → Pos → Pos → Char
| [], _, _ => default
| c::cs, i, p => if i = p then c else utf8GetAux cs (i + c) p
/--
Return character at position `p`. If `p` is not a valid position
returns `(default : Char)`.
See `utf8GetAux` for the reference implementation.
-/
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_get"]
def get (s : @& String) (p : @& Pos) : Char :=
match s with
| ⟨s⟩ => utf8GetAux s 0 p
def utf8GetAux? : List Char → Pos → Pos → Option Char
| [], _, _ => none
| c::cs, i, p => if i = p then c else utf8GetAux? cs (i + c) p
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_get_opt"]
def get? : (@& String) → (@& Pos) → Option Char
| ⟨s⟩, p => utf8GetAux? s 0 p
/--
Similar to `get`, but produces a panic error message if `p` is not a valid `String.Pos`.
-/
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_get_bang"]
def get! (s : @& String) (p : @& Pos) : Char :=
match s with
| ⟨s⟩ => utf8GetAux s 0 p
def utf8SetAux (c' : Char) : List Char → Pos → Pos → List Char
| [], _, _ => []
| c::cs, i, p =>
if i = p then (c'::cs) else c::(utf8SetAux c' cs (i + c) p)
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_set"]
def set : String → (@& Pos) → Char → String
| ⟨s⟩, i, c => ⟨utf8SetAux c s 0 i⟩
def modify (s : String) (i : Pos) (f : Char → Char) : String :=
s.set i <| f <| s.get i
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_next"]
def next (s : @& String) (p : @& Pos) : Pos :=
let c := get s p
p + c
def utf8PrevAux : List Char → Pos → Pos → Pos
| [], _, _ => 0
| c::cs, i, p =>
let i' := i + c
if i' = p then i else utf8PrevAux cs i' p
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_prev"]
def prev : (@& String) → (@& Pos) → Pos
| ⟨s⟩, p => if p = 0 then 0 else utf8PrevAux s 0 p
def front (s : String) : Char :=
get s 0
def back (s : String) : Char :=
get s (prev s s.endPos)
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_at_end"]
def atEnd : (@& String) → (@& Pos) → Bool
| s, p => p.byteIdx ≥ utf8ByteSize s
/--
Similar to `get` but runtime does not perform bounds check.
-/
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_get_fast"]
def get' (s : @& String) (p : @& Pos) (h : ¬ s.atEnd p) : Char :=
match s with
| ⟨s⟩ => utf8GetAux s 0 p
/--
Similar to `next` but runtime does not perform bounds check.
-/
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_next_fast"]
def next' (s : @& String) (p : @& Pos) (h : ¬ s.atEnd p) : Pos :=
let c := get s p
p + c
theorem one_le_csize (c : Char) : 1 ≤ csize c := by
repeat first | apply iteInduction (motive := (1 ≤ UInt32.toNat ·)) <;> intros | decide
@[simp] theorem pos_lt_eq (p₁ p₂ : Pos) : (p₁ < p₂) = (p₁.1 < p₂.1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem pos_add_char (p : Pos) (c : Char) : (p + c).byteIdx = p.byteIdx + csize c := rfl
theorem lt_next (s : String) (i : Pos) : i.1 < (s.next i).1 :=
Nat.add_lt_add_left (one_le_csize _) _
theorem utf8PrevAux_lt_of_pos : ∀ (cs : List Char) (i p : Pos), p ≠ 0 →
(utf8PrevAux cs i p).1 < p.1
| [], i, p, h =>
Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _)
(Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero (mt (congrArg Pos.mk) h))
| c::cs, i, p, h => by
simp [utf8PrevAux]
apply iteInduction (motive := (Pos.byteIdx · < _)) <;> intro h'
next => exact h' ▸ Nat.add_lt_add_left (one_le_csize _) _
next => exact utf8PrevAux_lt_of_pos _ _ _ h
theorem prev_lt_of_pos (s : String) (i : Pos) (h : i ≠ 0) : (s.prev i).1 < i.1 := by
simp [prev, h]
exact utf8PrevAux_lt_of_pos _ _ _ h
def posOfAux (s : String) (c : Char) (stopPos : Pos) (pos : Pos) : Pos :=
if h : pos < stopPos then
if s.get pos == c then pos
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left h (lt_next s pos)
posOfAux s c stopPos (s.next pos)
else pos
termination_by _ => stopPos.1 - pos.1
@[inline] def posOf (s : String) (c : Char) : Pos :=
posOfAux s c s.endPos 0
def revPosOfAux (s : String) (c : Char) (pos : Pos) : Option Pos :=
if h : pos = 0 then none
else
have := prev_lt_of_pos s pos h
let pos := s.prev pos
if s.get pos == c then some pos
else revPosOfAux s c pos
termination_by _ => pos.1
def revPosOf (s : String) (c : Char) : Option Pos :=
revPosOfAux s c s.endPos
def findAux (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) (stopPos : Pos) (pos : Pos) : Pos :=
if h : pos < stopPos then
if p (s.get pos) then pos
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left h (lt_next s pos)
findAux s p stopPos (s.next pos)
else pos
termination_by _ => stopPos.1 - pos.1
@[inline] def find (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : Pos :=
findAux s p s.endPos 0
def revFindAux (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) (pos : Pos) : Option Pos :=
if h : pos = 0 then none
else
have := prev_lt_of_pos s pos h
let pos := s.prev pos
if p (s.get pos) then some pos
else revFindAux s p pos
termination_by _ => pos.1
def revFind (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : Option Pos :=
revFindAux s p s.endPos
abbrev Pos.min (p₁ p₂ : Pos) : Pos :=
{ byteIdx := p₁.byteIdx.min p₂.byteIdx }
/-- Returns the first position where the two strings differ. -/
def firstDiffPos (a b : String) : Pos :=
let stopPos := a.endPos.min b.endPos
let rec loop (i : Pos) : Pos :=
if h : i < stopPos then
if a.get i != b.get i then i
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left h (lt_next a i)
loop (a.next i)
else i
loop 0
termination_by loop => stopPos.1 - i.1
@[extern "lean_string_utf8_extract"]
def extract : (@& String) → (@& Pos) → (@& Pos) → String
| ⟨s⟩, b, e => if b.byteIdx ≥ e.byteIdx then "" else ⟨go₁ s 0 b e⟩
where
go₁ : List Char → Pos → Pos → Pos → List Char
| [], _, _, _ => []
| s@(c::cs), i, b, e => if i = b then go₂ s i e else go₁ cs (i + c) b e
go₂ : List Char → Pos → Pos → List Char
| [], _, _ => []
| c::cs, i, e => if i = e then [] else c :: go₂ cs (i + c) e
@[specialize] def splitAux (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) (b : Pos) (i : Pos) (r : List String) : List String :=
if h : s.atEnd i then
let r := (s.extract b i)::r
r.reverse
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)) (lt_next s _)
if p (s.get i) then
let i' := s.next i
splitAux s p i' i' (s.extract b i :: r)
else
splitAux s p b (s.next i) r
termination_by _ => s.endPos.1 - i.1
@[specialize] def split (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : List String :=
splitAux s p 0 0 []
def splitOnAux (s sep : String) (b : Pos) (i : Pos) (j : Pos) (r : List String) : List String :=
if h : s.atEnd i then
let r := (s.extract b i)::r
r.reverse
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)) (lt_next s _)
if s.get i == sep.get j then
let i := s.next i
let j := sep.next j
if sep.atEnd j then
splitOnAux s sep i i 0 (s.extract b (i - j)::r)
else
splitOnAux s sep b i j r
else
splitOnAux s sep b (s.next i) 0 r
termination_by _ => s.endPos.1 - i.1
def splitOn (s : String) (sep : String := " ") : List String :=
if sep == "" then [s] else splitOnAux s sep 0 0 0 []
instance : Inhabited String := ⟨""⟩
instance : Append String := ⟨String.append⟩
def str : String → Char → String := push
def pushn (s : String) (c : Char) (n : Nat) : String :=
n.repeat (fun s => s.push c) s
def isEmpty (s : String) : Bool :=
s.endPos == 0
def join (l : List String) : String :=
l.foldl (fun r s => r ++ s) ""
def singleton (c : Char) : String :=
"".push c
def intercalate (s : String) : List String → String
| [] => ""
| a :: as => go a s as
where go (acc : String) (s : String) : List String → String
| a :: as => go (acc ++ s ++ a) s as
| [] => acc
/-- Iterator for `String`. That is, a `String` and a position in that string. -/
structure Iterator where
s : String
i : Pos
deriving DecidableEq
def mkIterator (s : String) : Iterator :=
⟨s, 0⟩
abbrev iter := mkIterator
instance : SizeOf String.Iterator where
sizeOf i := i.1.utf8ByteSize - i.2.byteIdx
theorem Iterator.sizeOf_eq (i : String.Iterator) : sizeOf i = i.1.utf8ByteSize - i.2.byteIdx :=
rfl
namespace Iterator
def toString : Iterator → String
| ⟨s, _⟩ => s
def remainingBytes : Iterator → Nat
| ⟨s, i⟩ => s.endPos.byteIdx - i.byteIdx
def pos : Iterator → Pos
| ⟨_, i⟩ => i
def curr : Iterator → Char
| ⟨s, i⟩ => get s i
def next : Iterator → Iterator
| ⟨s, i⟩ => ⟨s, s.next i⟩
def prev : Iterator → Iterator
| ⟨s, i⟩ => ⟨s, s.prev i⟩
def atEnd : Iterator → Bool
| ⟨s, i⟩ => i.byteIdx ≥ s.endPos.byteIdx
def hasNext : Iterator → Bool
| ⟨s, i⟩ => i.byteIdx < s.endPos.byteIdx
def hasPrev : Iterator → Bool
| ⟨_, i⟩ => i.byteIdx > 0
def setCurr : Iterator → Char → Iterator
| ⟨s, i⟩, c => ⟨s.set i c, i⟩
def toEnd : Iterator → Iterator
| ⟨s, _⟩ => ⟨s, s.endPos⟩
def extract : Iterator → Iterator → String
| ⟨s₁, b⟩, ⟨s₂, e⟩ =>
if s₁ ≠ s₂ || b > e then ""
else s₁.extract b e
def forward : Iterator → Nat → Iterator
| it, 0 => it
| it, n+1 => forward it.next n
def remainingToString : Iterator → String
| ⟨s, i⟩ => s.extract i s.endPos
def nextn : Iterator → Nat → Iterator
| it, 0 => it
| it, i+1 => nextn it.next i
def prevn : Iterator → Nat → Iterator
| it, 0 => it
| it, i+1 => prevn it.prev i
end Iterator
def offsetOfPosAux (s : String) (pos : Pos) (i : Pos) (offset : Nat) : Nat :=
if i >= pos then offset
else if h : s.atEnd i then
offset
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)) (lt_next s _)
offsetOfPosAux s pos (s.next i) (offset+1)
termination_by _ => s.endPos.1 - i.1
def offsetOfPos (s : String) (pos : Pos) : Nat :=
offsetOfPosAux s pos 0 0
@[specialize] def foldlAux {α : Type u} (f : α → Char → α) (s : String) (stopPos : Pos) (i : Pos) (a : α) : α :=
if h : i < stopPos then
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left h (lt_next s i)
foldlAux f s stopPos (s.next i) (f a (s.get i))
else a
termination_by _ => stopPos.1 - i.1
@[inline] def foldl {α : Type u} (f : α → Char → α) (init : α) (s : String) : α :=
foldlAux f s s.endPos 0 init
@[specialize] def foldrAux {α : Type u} (f : Char → α → α) (a : α) (s : String) (i begPos : Pos) : α :=
if h : begPos < i then
have := String.prev_lt_of_pos s i <| mt (congrArg String.Pos.byteIdx) <|
Ne.symm <| Nat.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h
let i := s.prev i
let a := f (s.get i) a
foldrAux f a s i begPos
else a
termination_by _ => i.1
@[inline] def foldr {α : Type u} (f : Char → α → α) (init : α) (s : String) : α :=
foldrAux f init s s.endPos 0
@[specialize] def anyAux (s : String) (stopPos : Pos) (p : Char → Bool) (i : Pos) : Bool :=
if h : i < stopPos then
if p (s.get i) then true
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left h (lt_next s i)
anyAux s stopPos p (s.next i)
else false
termination_by _ => stopPos.1 - i.1
@[inline] def any (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : Bool :=
anyAux s s.endPos p 0
@[inline] def all (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : Bool :=
!s.any (fun c => !p c)
def contains (s : String) (c : Char) : Bool :=
s.any (fun a => a == c)
theorem utf8SetAux_of_gt (c' : Char) : ∀ (cs : List Char) {i p : Pos}, i > p → utf8SetAux c' cs i p = cs
| [], _, _, _ => rfl
| c::cs, i, p, h => by
rw [utf8SetAux, if_neg (mt (congrArg (·.1)) (Ne.symm <| Nat.ne_of_lt h)), utf8SetAux_of_gt c' cs]
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
theorem set_next_add (s : String) (i : Pos) (c : Char) (b₁ b₂)
(h : (s.next i).1 + b₁ = s.endPos.1 + b₂) :
((s.set i c).next i).1 + b₁ = (s.set i c).endPos.1 + b₂ := by
simp [next, get, set, endPos, utf8ByteSize] at h ⊢
rw [Nat.add_comm i.1, Nat.add_assoc] at h ⊢
let rec foo : ∀ cs a b₁ b₂,
csize (utf8GetAux cs a i) + b₁ = utf8ByteSize.go cs + b₂ →
csize (utf8GetAux (utf8SetAux c cs a i) a i) + b₁ = utf8ByteSize.go (utf8SetAux c cs a i) + b₂
| [], _, _, _, h => h
| c'::cs, a, b₁, b₂, h => by
unfold utf8SetAux
apply iteInduction (motive := fun p => csize (utf8GetAux p a i) + b₁ = utf8ByteSize.go p + b₂) <;>
intro h' <;> simp [utf8GetAux, h', utf8ByteSize.go] at h ⊢
next =>
rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm] at h ⊢; rw [Nat.add_left_cancel h]
next =>
rw [Nat.add_assoc] at h ⊢
refine foo cs (a + c') b₁ (csize c' + b₂) h
exact foo s.1 0 _ _ h
theorem mapAux_lemma (s : String) (i : Pos) (c : Char) (h : ¬s.atEnd i) :
(s.set i c).endPos.1 - ((s.set i c).next i).1 < s.endPos.1 - i.1 :=
suffices (s.set i c).endPos.1 - ((s.set i c).next i).1 = s.endPos.1 - (s.next i).1 by
rw [this]
apply Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)) (lt_next ..)
Nat.sub.elim (motive := (_ = ·)) _ _
(fun _ k e =>
have := set_next_add _ _ _ k 0 e.symm
Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add <| this.symm.trans <| Nat.add_comm ..)
(fun h => by
have ⟨k, e⟩ := Nat.le.dest h
rw [Nat.succ_add] at e
have : ((s.set i c).next i).1 = _ := set_next_add _ _ c 0 k.succ e.symm
exact Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le (this ▸ Nat.le_add_right ..))
@[specialize] def mapAux (f : Char → Char) (i : Pos) (s : String) : String :=
if h : s.atEnd i then s
else
let c := f (s.get i)
have := mapAux_lemma s i c h
let s := s.set i c
mapAux f (s.next i) s
termination_by _ => s.endPos.1 - i.1
@[inline] def map (f : Char → Char) (s : String) : String :=
mapAux f 0 s
def isNat (s : String) : Bool :=
!s.isEmpty && s.all (·.isDigit)
def toNat? (s : String) : Option Nat :=
if s.isNat then
some <| s.foldl (fun n c => n*10 + (c.toNat - '0'.toNat)) 0
else
none
/--
Return `true` iff the substring of byte size `sz` starting at position `off1` in `s1` is equal to that starting at `off2` in `s2.`.
False if either substring of that byte size does not exist. -/
def substrEq (s1 : String) (off1 : String.Pos) (s2 : String) (off2 : String.Pos) (sz : Nat) : Bool :=
off1.byteIdx + sz ≤ s1.endPos.byteIdx && off2.byteIdx + sz ≤ s2.endPos.byteIdx && loop off1 off2 { byteIdx := off1.byteIdx + sz }
where
loop (off1 off2 stop1 : Pos) :=
if h : off1.byteIdx < stop1.byteIdx then
let c₁ := s1.get off1
let c₂ := s2.get off2
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left h (Nat.add_lt_add_left (one_le_csize c₁) off1.1)
c₁ == c₂ && loop (off1 + c₁) (off2 + c₂) stop1
else true
termination_by loop => stop1.1 - off1.1
/-- Return true iff `p` is a prefix of `s` -/
def isPrefixOf (p : String) (s : String) : Bool :=
substrEq p 0 s 0 p.endPos.byteIdx
/-- Replace all occurrences of `pattern` in `s` with `replacement`. -/
def replace (s pattern replacement : String) : String :=
if h : pattern.endPos.1 = 0 then s
else
have hPatt := Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h
let rec loop (acc : String) (accStop pos : String.Pos) :=
if h : pos.byteIdx + pattern.endPos.byteIdx > s.endPos.byteIdx then
acc ++ s.extract accStop s.endPos
else
have := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add_left hPatt _) (Nat.ge_of_not_lt h)
if s.substrEq pos pattern 0 pattern.endPos.byteIdx then
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left this (Nat.add_lt_add_left hPatt _)
loop (acc ++ s.extract accStop pos ++ replacement) (pos + pattern) (pos + pattern)
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left this (lt_next s pos)
loop acc accStop (s.next pos)
loop "" 0 0
termination_by loop => s.endPos.1 - pos.1
end String
namespace Substring
@[inline] def isEmpty (ss : Substring) : Bool :=
ss.bsize == 0
@[inline] def toString : Substring → String
| ⟨s, b, e⟩ => s.extract b e
@[inline] def toIterator : Substring → String.Iterator
| ⟨s, b, _⟩ => ⟨s, b⟩
/-- Return the codepoint at the given offset into the substring. -/
@[inline] def get : Substring → String.Pos → Char
| ⟨s, b, _⟩, p => s.get (b+p)
/-- Given an offset of a codepoint into the substring,
return the offset there of the next codepoint. -/
@[inline] def next : Substring → String.Pos → String.Pos
| ⟨s, b, e⟩, p =>
let absP := b+p
if absP = e then p else { byteIdx := (s.next absP).byteIdx - b.byteIdx }
theorem lt_next (s : Substring) (i : String.Pos) (h : i.1 < s.bsize) :
i.1 < (s.next i).1 := by
simp [next]; rw [if_neg ?a]
case a =>
refine mt (congrArg String.Pos.byteIdx) (Nat.ne_of_lt ?_)
exact (Nat.add_comm .. ▸ Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub h :)
apply Nat.lt_sub_of_add_lt
rw [Nat.add_comm]; apply String.lt_next
/-- Given an offset of a codepoint into the substring,
return the offset there of the previous codepoint. -/
@[inline] def prev : Substring → String.Pos → String.Pos
| ⟨s, b, _⟩, p =>
let absP := b+p
if absP = b then p else { byteIdx := (s.prev absP).byteIdx - b.byteIdx }
def nextn : Substring → Nat → String.Pos → String.Pos
| _, 0, p => p
| ss, i+1, p => ss.nextn i (ss.next p)
def prevn : Substring → Nat → String.Pos → String.Pos
| _, 0, p => p
| ss, i+1, p => ss.prevn i (ss.prev p)
@[inline] def front (s : Substring) : Char :=
s.get 0
/-- Return the offset into `s` of the first occurence of `c` in `s`,
or `s.bsize` if `c` doesn't occur. -/
@[inline] def posOf (s : Substring) (c : Char) : String.Pos :=
match s with
| ⟨s, b, e⟩ => { byteIdx := (String.posOfAux s c e b).byteIdx - b.byteIdx }
@[inline] def drop : Substring → Nat → Substring
| ss@⟨s, b, e⟩, n => ⟨s, b + ss.nextn n 0, e⟩
@[inline] def dropRight : Substring → Nat → Substring
| ss@⟨s, b, _⟩, n => ⟨s, b, b + ss.prevn n ⟨ss.bsize⟩⟩
@[inline] def take : Substring → Nat → Substring
| ss@⟨s, b, _⟩, n => ⟨s, b, b + ss.nextn n 0⟩
@[inline] def takeRight : Substring → Nat → Substring
| ss@⟨s, b, e⟩, n => ⟨s, b + ss.prevn n ⟨ss.bsize⟩, e⟩
@[inline] def atEnd : Substring → String.Pos → Bool
| ⟨_, b, e⟩, p => b + p == e
@[inline] def extract : Substring → String.Pos → String.Pos → Substring
| ⟨s, b, e⟩, b', e' => if b' ≥ e' then ⟨"", 0, 0⟩ else ⟨s, e.min (b+b'), e.min (b+e')⟩
def splitOn (s : Substring) (sep : String := " ") : List Substring :=
if sep == "" then
[s]
else
let rec loop (b i j : String.Pos) (r : List Substring) : List Substring :=
if h : i.byteIdx < s.bsize then
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left h (lt_next s i h)
if s.get i == sep.get j then
let i := s.next i
let j := sep.next j
if sep.atEnd j then
loop i i 0 (s.extract b (i-j) :: r)
else
loop b i j r
else
loop b (s.next i) 0 r
else
let r := if sep.atEnd j then
"".toSubstring :: s.extract b (i-j) :: r
else
s.extract b i :: r
r.reverse
loop 0 0 0 []
termination_by loop => s.bsize - i.1
@[inline] def foldl {α : Type u} (f : α → Char → α) (init : α) (s : Substring) : α :=
match s with
| ⟨s, b, e⟩ => String.foldlAux f s e b init
@[inline] def foldr {α : Type u} (f : Char → α → α) (init : α) (s : Substring) : α :=
match s with
| ⟨s, b, e⟩ => String.foldrAux f init s e b
@[inline] def any (s : Substring) (p : Char → Bool) : Bool :=
match s with
| ⟨s, b, e⟩ => String.anyAux s e p b
@[inline] def all (s : Substring) (p : Char → Bool) : Bool :=
!s.any (fun c => !p c)
def contains (s : Substring) (c : Char) : Bool :=
s.any (fun a => a == c)
@[specialize] def takeWhileAux (s : String) (stopPos : String.Pos) (p : Char → Bool) (i : String.Pos) : String.Pos :=
if h : i < stopPos then
if p (s.get i) then
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left h (String.lt_next s i)
takeWhileAux s stopPos p (s.next i)
else i
else i
termination_by _ => stopPos.1 - i.1
@[inline] def takeWhile : Substring → (Char → Bool) → Substring
| ⟨s, b, e⟩, p =>
let e := takeWhileAux s e p b;
⟨s, b, e⟩
@[inline] def dropWhile : Substring → (Char → Bool) → Substring
| ⟨s, b, e⟩, p =>
let b := takeWhileAux s e p b;
⟨s, b, e⟩
@[specialize] def takeRightWhileAux (s : String) (begPos : String.Pos) (p : Char → Bool) (i : String.Pos) : String.Pos :=
if h : begPos < i then
have := String.prev_lt_of_pos s i <| mt (congrArg String.Pos.byteIdx) <|
Ne.symm <| Nat.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h
let i' := s.prev i
let c := s.get i'
if !p c then i
else takeRightWhileAux s begPos p i'
else i
termination_by _ => i.1
@[inline] def takeRightWhile : Substring → (Char → Bool) → Substring
| ⟨s, b, e⟩, p =>
let b := takeRightWhileAux s b p e
⟨s, b, e⟩
@[inline] def dropRightWhile : Substring → (Char → Bool) → Substring
| ⟨s, b, e⟩, p =>
let e := takeRightWhileAux s b p e
⟨s, b, e⟩
@[inline] def trimLeft (s : Substring) : Substring :=
s.dropWhile Char.isWhitespace
@[inline] def trimRight (s : Substring) : Substring :=
s.dropRightWhile Char.isWhitespace
@[inline] def trim : Substring → Substring
| ⟨s, b, e⟩ =>
let b := takeWhileAux s e Char.isWhitespace b
let e := takeRightWhileAux s b Char.isWhitespace e
⟨s, b, e⟩
def isNat (s : Substring) : Bool :=
s.all fun c => c.isDigit
def toNat? (s : Substring) : Option Nat :=
if s.isNat then
some <| s.foldl (fun n c => n*10 + (c.toNat - '0'.toNat)) 0
else
none
def beq (ss1 ss2 : Substring) : Bool :=
ss1.bsize == ss2.bsize && ss1.str.substrEq ss1.startPos ss2.str ss2.startPos ss1.bsize
instance hasBeq : BEq Substring := ⟨beq⟩
end Substring
namespace String
def drop (s : String) (n : Nat) : String :=
(s.toSubstring.drop n).toString
def dropRight (s : String) (n : Nat) : String :=
(s.toSubstring.dropRight n).toString
def take (s : String) (n : Nat) : String :=
(s.toSubstring.take n).toString
def takeRight (s : String) (n : Nat) : String :=
(s.toSubstring.takeRight n).toString
def takeWhile (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : String :=
(s.toSubstring.takeWhile p).toString
def dropWhile (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : String :=
(s.toSubstring.dropWhile p).toString
def takeRightWhile (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : String :=
(s.toSubstring.takeRightWhile p).toString
def dropRightWhile (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : String :=
(s.toSubstring.dropRightWhile p).toString
def startsWith (s pre : String) : Bool :=
s.toSubstring.take pre.length == pre.toSubstring
def endsWith (s post : String) : Bool :=
s.toSubstring.takeRight post.length == post.toSubstring
def trimRight (s : String) : String :=
s.toSubstring.trimRight.toString
def trimLeft (s : String) : String :=
s.toSubstring.trimLeft.toString
def trim (s : String) : String :=
s.toSubstring.trim.toString
@[inline] def nextWhile (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) (i : String.Pos) : String.Pos :=
Substring.takeWhileAux s s.endPos p i
@[inline] def nextUntil (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) (i : String.Pos) : String.Pos :=
nextWhile s (fun c => !p c) i
def toUpper (s : String) : String :=
s.map Char.toUpper
def toLower (s : String) : String :=
s.map Char.toLower
def capitalize (s : String) :=
s.set 0 <| s.get 0 |>.toUpper
def decapitalize (s : String) :=
s.set 0 <| s.get 0 |>.toLower
end String
protected def Char.toString (c : Char) : String :=
String.singleton c
|
4085080e6c673147dd370e81ada5f873218d23ea | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/order/category/Preorder.lean | bd642c9785ad88335018b11a74e432eec4f145b6 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,262 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.order.preorder_hom
import Mathlib.category_theory.concrete_category.default
import Mathlib.algebra.punit_instances
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1
namespace Mathlib
/-! # Category of preorders -/
/-- The category of preorders. -/
def Preorder :=
category_theory.bundled preorder
namespace Preorder
protected instance preorder_hom.category_theory.bundled_hom : category_theory.bundled_hom preorder_hom :=
category_theory.bundled_hom.mk preorder_hom.to_fun preorder_hom.id preorder_hom.comp
protected instance concrete_category : category_theory.concrete_category Preorder :=
category_theory.bundled_hom.category_theory.bundled.category_theory.concrete_category preorder_hom
/-- Construct a bundled Preorder from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
def of (α : Type u_1) [preorder α] : Preorder :=
category_theory.bundled.of α
protected instance inhabited : Inhabited Preorder :=
{ default := of PUnit }
protected instance preorder (α : Preorder) : preorder ↥α :=
category_theory.bundled.str α
|
b3c61c5052f6889288a49ce76e7c6303ab494545 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/set_theory/game/impartial.lean | 3b3c9c36a5f3b83cfbd627999fdf652969d77686 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,337 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson
-/
import set_theory.game.winner
import tactic.nth_rewrite.default
import tactic.equiv_rw
universe u
/-!
# Basic definitions about impartial (pre-)games
We will define an impartial game, one in which left and right can make exactly the same moves.
Our definition differs slightly by saying that the game is always equivalent to its negative,
no matter what moves are played. This allows for games such as poker-nim to be classifed as
impartial.
-/
namespace pgame
local infix ` ≈ ` := equiv
/-- The definition for a impartial game, defined using Conway induction -/
def impartial_aux : pgame → Prop
| G := G ≈ -G ∧ (∀ i, impartial_aux (G.move_left i)) ∧ (∀ j, impartial_aux (G.move_right j))
using_well_founded { dec_tac := pgame_wf_tac }
lemma impartial_aux_def {G : pgame} : G.impartial_aux ↔ G ≈ -G ∧
(∀ i, impartial_aux (G.move_left i)) ∧ (∀ j, impartial_aux (G.move_right j)) :=
begin
split,
{ intro hi,
unfold1 impartial_aux at hi,
exact hi },
{ intro hi,
unfold1 impartial_aux,
exact hi }
end
/-- A typeclass on impartial games. -/
class impartial (G : pgame) : Prop := (out : impartial_aux G)
lemma impartial_iff_aux {G : pgame} : G.impartial ↔ G.impartial_aux :=
⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma impartial_def {G : pgame} : G.impartial ↔ G ≈ -G ∧
(∀ i, impartial (G.move_left i)) ∧ (∀ j, impartial (G.move_right j)) :=
by simpa only [impartial_iff_aux] using impartial_aux_def
namespace impartial
instance impartial_zero : impartial 0 := by tidy
lemma neg_equiv_self (G : pgame) [h : G.impartial] : G ≈ -G := (impartial_def.1 h).1
instance move_left_impartial {G : pgame} [h : G.impartial] (i : G.left_moves) :
(G.move_left i).impartial :=
(impartial_def.1 h).2.1 i
instance move_right_impartial {G : pgame} [h : G.impartial] (j : G.right_moves) :
(G.move_right j).impartial :=
(impartial_def.1 h).2.2 j
instance impartial_add : ∀ (G H : pgame) [G.impartial] [H.impartial], (G + H).impartial
| G H :=
begin
introsI hG hH,
rw impartial_def,
split,
{ apply equiv_trans _ (equiv_of_relabelling (neg_add_relabelling G H)).symm,
exact add_congr (neg_equiv_self _) (neg_equiv_self _) },
split,
all_goals
{ intro i,
equiv_rw pgame.left_moves_add G H at i <|> equiv_rw pgame.right_moves_add G H at i,
cases i },
all_goals
{ simp only [add_move_left_inl, add_move_right_inl, add_move_left_inr, add_move_right_inr],
exact impartial_add _ _ }
end
using_well_founded { dec_tac := pgame_wf_tac }
instance impartial_neg : ∀ (G : pgame) [G.impartial], (-G).impartial
| G :=
begin
introI hG,
rw impartial_def,
split,
{ rw neg_neg,
symmetry,
exact neg_equiv_self G },
split,
all_goals
{ intro i,
equiv_rw G.left_moves_neg at i <|> equiv_rw G.right_moves_neg at i,
simp only [move_left_left_moves_neg_symm, move_right_right_moves_neg_symm],
exact impartial_neg _ }
end
using_well_founded { dec_tac := pgame_wf_tac }
lemma winner_cases (G : pgame) [G.impartial] : G.first_loses ∨ G.first_wins :=
begin
rcases G.winner_cases with hl | hr | hp | hn,
{ cases hl with hpos hnonneg,
rw ←not_lt at hnonneg,
have hneg := lt_of_lt_of_equiv hpos (neg_equiv_self G),
rw [lt_iff_neg_gt, neg_neg, neg_zero] at hneg,
contradiction },
{ cases hr with hnonpos hneg,
rw ←not_lt at hnonpos,
have hpos := lt_of_equiv_of_lt (neg_equiv_self G).symm hneg,
rw [lt_iff_neg_gt, neg_neg, neg_zero] at hpos,
contradiction },
{ left, assumption },
{ right, assumption }
end
lemma not_first_wins (G : pgame) [G.impartial] : ¬G.first_wins ↔ G.first_loses :=
by cases winner_cases G; finish using [not_first_loses_of_first_wins]
lemma not_first_loses (G : pgame) [G.impartial] : ¬G.first_loses ↔ G.first_wins :=
iff.symm $ iff_not_comm.1 $ iff.symm $ not_first_wins G
lemma add_self (G : pgame) [G.impartial] : (G + G).first_loses :=
first_loses_is_zero.2 $ equiv_trans (add_congr (neg_equiv_self G) G.equiv_refl)
add_left_neg_equiv
lemma equiv_iff_sum_first_loses (G H : pgame) [G.impartial] [H.impartial] :
G ≈ H ↔ (G + H).first_loses :=
begin
split,
{ intro heq,
exact first_loses_of_equiv (add_congr (equiv_refl _) heq) (add_self G) },
{ intro hGHp,
split,
{ rw le_iff_sub_nonneg,
exact le_trans hGHp.2
(le_trans add_comm_le $ le_of_le_of_equiv (le_refl _) $ add_congr (equiv_refl _)
(neg_equiv_self G)) },
{ rw le_iff_sub_nonneg,
exact le_trans hGHp.2
(le_of_le_of_equiv (le_refl _) $ add_congr (equiv_refl _) (neg_equiv_self H)) } }
end
lemma le_zero_iff {G : pgame} [G.impartial] : G ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ G :=
by rw [le_zero_iff_zero_le_neg, le_congr (equiv_refl 0) (neg_equiv_self G)]
lemma lt_zero_iff {G : pgame} [G.impartial] : G < 0 ↔ 0 < G :=
by rw [lt_iff_neg_gt, neg_zero, lt_congr (equiv_refl 0) (neg_equiv_self G)]
lemma first_loses_symm (G : pgame) [G.impartial] : G.first_loses ↔ G ≤ 0 :=
⟨and.left, λ h, ⟨h, le_zero_iff.1 h⟩⟩
lemma first_wins_symm (G : pgame) [G.impartial] : G.first_wins ↔ G < 0 :=
⟨and.right, λ h, ⟨lt_zero_iff.1 h, h⟩⟩
lemma first_loses_symm' (G : pgame) [G.impartial] : G.first_loses ↔ 0 ≤ G :=
⟨and.right, λ h, ⟨le_zero_iff.2 h, h⟩⟩
lemma first_wins_symm' (G : pgame) [G.impartial] : G.first_wins ↔ 0 < G :=
⟨and.left, λ h, ⟨h, lt_zero_iff.2 h⟩⟩
lemma no_good_left_moves_iff_first_loses (G : pgame) [G.impartial] :
(∀ (i : G.left_moves), (G.move_left i).first_wins) ↔ G.first_loses :=
begin
split,
{ intro hbad,
rw [first_loses_symm G, le_def_lt],
split,
{ intro i,
specialize hbad i,
exact hbad.2 },
{ intro j,
exact pempty.elim j } },
{ intros hp i,
rw first_wins_symm,
exact (le_def_lt.1 $ (first_loses_symm G).1 hp).1 i }
end
lemma no_good_right_moves_iff_first_loses (G : pgame) [G.impartial] :
(∀ (j : G.right_moves), (G.move_right j).first_wins) ↔ G.first_loses :=
begin
rw [first_loses_of_equiv_iff (neg_equiv_self G), ←no_good_left_moves_iff_first_loses],
refine ⟨λ h i, _, λ h i, _⟩,
{ simpa [first_wins_of_equiv_iff (neg_equiv_self ((-G).move_left i))]
using h (left_moves_neg _ i) },
{ simpa [first_wins_of_equiv_iff (neg_equiv_self (G.move_right i))]
using h ((left_moves_neg _).symm i) }
end
lemma good_left_move_iff_first_wins (G : pgame) [G.impartial] :
(∃ (i : G.left_moves), (G.move_left i).first_loses) ↔ G.first_wins :=
begin
refine ⟨λ ⟨i, hi⟩, (first_wins_symm' G).2 (lt_def_le.2 $ or.inl ⟨i, hi.2⟩), λ hn, _⟩,
rw [first_wins_symm' G, lt_def_le] at hn,
rcases hn with ⟨i, hi⟩ | ⟨j, _⟩,
{ exact ⟨i, (first_loses_symm' _).2 hi⟩ },
{ exact pempty.elim j }
end
lemma good_right_move_iff_first_wins (G : pgame) [G.impartial] :
(∃ j : G.right_moves, (G.move_right j).first_loses) ↔ G.first_wins :=
begin
refine ⟨λ ⟨j, hj⟩, (first_wins_symm G).2 (lt_def_le.2 $ or.inr ⟨j, hj.1⟩), λ hn, _⟩,
rw [first_wins_symm G, lt_def_le] at hn,
rcases hn with ⟨i, _⟩ | ⟨j, hj⟩,
{ exact pempty.elim i },
{ exact ⟨j, (first_loses_symm _).2 hj⟩ }
end
end impartial
end pgame
|
f00faf30ad4766f71c6635ce563f5fefcc184c5b | d8820d2c92be8052d13f9c8f8c483a6e15c5f566 | /src/Groups/groups.lean | 4b65fc64388f8a71b5eb087841d1331cb8b72055 | [] | no_license | JasonKYi/M4000x_LEAN_formalisation | 4a19b84f6d0fe2e214485b8532e21cd34996c4b1 | 6e99793f2fcbe88596e27644f430e46aa2a464df | refs/heads/master | 1,599,755,414,708 | 1,589,494,604,000 | 1,589,494,604,000 | 221,759,483 | 8 | 1 | null | 1,589,494,605,000 | 1,573,755,201,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,462 | lean | /- Formalisation of Groups from the module Linear Algebra and Groups -/
import tactic
/- Chapter 1. Groups and Subgroups -/
namespace M40004
-- Definition of a group
@[simp] def is_assoc (G : Type*) (operat : G → G → G) :=
∀ g h k : G, operat (operat g h) k = operat g (operat h k)
@[simp] def is_identity (G : Type*) (operat : G → G → G) (e : G) :=
∀ g : G, operat g e = operat e g ∧ operat g e = g
@[simp] def has_identity (G : Type*) (operat : G → G → G) :=
∃ e : G, is_identity G operat e
@[simp] def is_inverse (G : Type*) (operat : G → G → G) (g h : G) :=
operat g h = operat h g ∧ is_identity G operat (operat g h)
@[simp] def has_inverse (G : Type*) (operat : G → G → G) :=
∀ g : G, ∃ h : G, is_inverse G operat g h
structure is_group (G : Type*) (operat : G → G → G) :=
(group_assoc : is_assoc G operat)
(group_identity : has_identity G operat)
(group_inverse : has_inverse G operat)
-- A group has a unique identity
theorem unique_identity {G : Type*} {operat : G → G → G} :
∀ e₁ e₂ : G, is_identity G operat e₁ ∧ is_identity G operat e₂ → e₁ = e₂ :=
begin
rintros e₁ e₂ ⟨id₁, id₂⟩,
rw [←(id₂ e₁).right, (id₂ e₁).left],
from (id₁ e₂).right
end
-- An element in a group has an unique inverse
theorem unique_inverse {G : Type*} {operat : G → G → G} (hgp : is_group G operat) :
∀ g h k : G, is_inverse G operat g h ∧ is_inverse G operat g k → h = k :=
begin
rintros g h k ⟨invh, invk⟩,
have : operat (operat k g) h = h :=
by {cases invk with heq hid,by
rw [←heq, ←(hid h).left, (hid h).right]
},
rw [←this, hgp.group_assoc],
repeat {swap, assumption},
suffices : is_identity G operat (operat g h),
rwa (this k).right,
from invh.right
end
-- Some lemmas that makes working easier
lemma operat_both_sides {G : Type*} {operat : G → G → G} {hgp : is_group G operat} (a b c : G) :
b = c → operat a b = operat a c := λ h, by {rw h}
-- Some properties of a group
-- If ab = ac then b = c
theorem left_operat_cancel {G : Type*} {operat : G → G → G} (hgp : is_group G operat) :
∀ a b c : G, operat a b = operat a c → b = c :=
begin
intros a b c h,
cases hgp.group_inverse a with ainv hainv,
suffices : operat ainv (operat a b) = operat ainv (operat a c),
repeat {rw ←hgp.group_assoc at this},
sorry,
sorry
end
end M40004
|
102fc21189474ee5f698186276f0fee817748538 | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/constructions/finite_products.lean | 0fe5459cb955216b998d3c94ec5999a49ecb1ee5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 77 | lean | -- TODO construct finite products from binary products and an initial object
|
41c647994a0a064098b44722780779fa90503fb4 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/errors.lean | f841286ed86b9551fb96b1f1fb448b0bd69f19e6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 534 | lean | namespace foo
definition tst1 : nat → nat → nat :=
a + b -- ERROR
check tst1
definition tst2 : nat → nat → nat :=
begin
intro a,
intro b,
cases nat.add wth (a, b), -- ERROR
exact a,
exact b,
end
section
parameter A : Type
definition tst3 : A → A → A :=
begin
intro a,
apply b, -- ERROR
exact a
end
check tst3
end
end foo
open nat
noncomputable definition bla : nat :=
foo.tst1 0 0 + foo.tst2 0 0 + foo.tst3 nat 1 1
check foo.tst1
check foo.tst2
check foo.tst3
|
1942164df19c05b6136e84402789787ff3d1b79c | 5749d8999a76f3a8fddceca1f6941981e33aaa96 | /src/topology/instances/ennreal.lean | 42b1641701e5eec2230c8326c1c63ff0337eb30f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jdsalchow/mathlib | 13ab43ef0d0515a17e550b16d09bd14b76125276 | 497e692b946d93906900bb33a51fd243e7649406 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,819,143,348 | 1,580,072,892,000 | 1,580,072,892,000 | 154,287,128 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,281,610,000 | 1,540,281,609,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,997 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl
Extended non-negative reals
-/
import topology.instances.nnreal data.real.ennreal
noncomputable theory
open classical set lattice filter metric
open_locale classical
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
open_locale ennreal
namespace ennreal
variables {a b c d : ennreal} {r p q : nnreal}
variables {x y z : ennreal} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ennreal} {s : set ennreal}
section topological_space
open topological_space
/-- Topology on `ennreal`.
Note: this is different from the `emetric_space` topology. The `emetric_space` topology has
`is_open {⊤}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : topological_space ennreal :=
topological_space.generate_from {s | ∃a, s = {b | a < b} ∨ s = {b | b < a}}
instance : order_topology ennreal := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : t2_space ennreal := by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
instance : second_countable_topology ennreal :=
⟨⟨⋃q ≥ (0:ℚ), {{a : ennreal | a < nnreal.of_real q}, {a : ennreal | ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < a}},
countable_bUnion (countable_encodable _) $ assume a ha, countable_insert (countable_singleton _),
le_antisymm
(le_generate_from $ by simp [or_imp_distrib, is_open_lt', is_open_gt'] {contextual := tt})
(le_generate_from $ λ s h, begin
rcases h with ⟨a, hs | hs⟩;
[ rw show s = ⋃q∈{q:ℚ | 0 ≤ q ∧ a < nnreal.of_real q}, {b | ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < b},
from set.ext (assume b, by simp [hs, @ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn a b, and_assoc]),
rw show s = ⋃q∈{q:ℚ | 0 ≤ q ∧ ↑(nnreal.of_real q) < a}, {b | b < ↑(nnreal.of_real q)},
from set.ext (assume b, by simp [hs, @ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn b a, and_comm, and_assoc])];
{ apply is_open_Union, intro q,
apply is_open_Union, intro hq,
exact generate_open.basic _ (mem_bUnion hq.1 $ by simp) }
end)⟩⟩
lemma embedding_coe : embedding (coe : nnreal → ennreal) :=
⟨⟨begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ rw [order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals ennreal,
← coinduced_le_iff_le_induced],
refine le_generate_from (assume s ha, _),
rcases ha with ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩,
show is_open {b : nnreal | a < ↑b},
{ cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, is_open_lt'] },
show is_open {b : nnreal | ↑b < a},
{ cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, is_open_gt', is_open_const] } },
{ rw [order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals nnreal],
refine le_generate_from (assume s ha, _),
rcases ha with ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩,
exact ⟨Ioi a, is_open_Ioi, by simp [Ioi]⟩,
exact ⟨Iio a, is_open_Iio, by simp [Iio]⟩ }
end⟩,
assume a b, coe_eq_coe.1⟩
lemma is_open_ne_top : is_open {a : ennreal | a ≠ ⊤} :=
is_open_neg (is_closed_eq continuous_id continuous_const)
lemma is_open_Ico_zero : is_open (Ico 0 b) := by { rw ennreal.Ico_eq_Iio, exact is_open_Iio}
lemma coe_range_mem_nhds : range (coe : nnreal → ennreal) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ennreal) :=
have {a : ennreal | a ≠ ⊤} = range (coe : nnreal → ennreal),
from set.ext $ assume a, by cases a; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe],
this ▸ mem_nhds_sets is_open_ne_top coe_ne_top
@[elim_cast] lemma tendsto_coe {f : filter α} {m : α → nnreal} {a : nnreal} :
tendsto (λa, (m a : ennreal)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
lemma continuous_coe {α} [topological_space α] {f : α → nnreal} :
continuous (λa, (f a : ennreal)) ↔ continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
lemma nhds_coe {r : nnreal} : 𝓝 (r : ennreal) = (𝓝 r).map coe :=
by rw [embedding_coe.induced, map_nhds_induced_eq coe_range_mem_nhds]
lemma nhds_coe_coe {r p : nnreal} : 𝓝 ((r : ennreal), (p : ennreal)) =
(𝓝 (r, p)).map (λp:nnreal×nnreal, (p.1, p.2)) :=
begin
rw [(embedding_coe.prod_mk embedding_coe).map_nhds_eq],
rw [← prod_range_range_eq],
exact prod_mem_nhds_sets coe_range_mem_nhds coe_range_mem_nhds
end
lemma continuous_of_real : continuous ennreal.of_real :=
(continuous_coe.2 continuous_id).comp nnreal.continuous_of_real
lemma tendsto_of_real {f : filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λa, ennreal.of_real (m a)) f (𝓝 (ennreal.of_real a)) :=
tendsto.comp (continuous.tendsto continuous_of_real _) h
lemma tendsto_to_nnreal {a : ennreal} : a ≠ ⊤ →
tendsto (ennreal.to_nnreal) (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.to_nnreal) :=
begin
cases a; simp [some_eq_coe, none_eq_top, nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
exact tendsto_id
end
lemma tendsto_to_real {a : ennreal} : a ≠ ⊤ → tendsto (ennreal.to_real) (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.to_real) :=
λ ha, tendsto.comp ((@nnreal.tendsto_coe _ (𝓝 a.to_nnreal) id (a.to_nnreal)).2 tendsto_id)
(tendsto_to_nnreal ha)
lemma tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ennreal} {f : filter α}
(h : ∀n:ℕ, {a | ↑n < m a} ∈ f) : tendsto m f (𝓝 ⊤) :=
tendsto_nhds_generate_from $ assume s hs,
match s, hs with
| _, ⟨none, or.inl rfl⟩, hr := (lt_irrefl ⊤ hr).elim
| _, ⟨some r, or.inl rfl⟩, hr :=
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := exists_nat_gt r in
mem_sets_of_superset (h n) $ assume a hnma, show ↑r < m a, from
lt_trans (show (r : ennreal) < n, from (coe_nat n) ▸ coe_lt_coe.2 hrn) hnma
| _, ⟨a, or.inr rfl⟩, hr := (not_top_lt $ show ⊤ < a, from hr).elim
end
lemma tendsto_nat_nhds_top : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, ↑n) at_top (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top $ λ n, mem_at_top_sets.2
⟨n+1, λ m hm, ennreal.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.2 $ nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
lemma nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅a ≠ ∞, principal (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans $ by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
lemma nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ennreal) = ⨅a ≠ 0, principal (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans $ by simp [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Iio]
-- using Icc because
-- • don't have 'Ioo (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x' unless x > 0
-- • (x - y ≤ ε ↔ x ≤ ε + y) is true, while (x - y < ε ↔ x < ε + y) is not
lemma Icc_mem_nhds : x ≠ ⊤ → ε > 0 → Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
begin
assume xt ε0, rw mem_nhds_sets_iff,
by_cases x0 : x = 0,
{ use Iio (x + ε),
have : Iio (x + ε) ⊆ Icc (x - ε) (x + ε), assume a, rw x0, simpa using le_of_lt,
use this, exact ⟨is_open_Iio, mem_Iio_self_add xt ε0⟩ },
{ use Ioo (x - ε) (x + ε), use Ioo_subset_Icc_self,
exact ⟨is_open_Ioo, mem_Ioo_self_sub_add xt x0 ε0 ε0 ⟩ }
end
lemma nhds_of_ne_top : x ≠ ⊤ → 𝓝 x = ⨅ε > 0, principal (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
begin
assume xt, refine le_antisymm _ _,
-- first direction
simp only [le_infi_iff, le_principal_iff], assume ε ε0, exact Icc_mem_nhds xt ε0,
-- second direction
rw nhds_generate_from, refine le_infi (assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, _),
simp only [mem_set_of_eq] at hs, rcases hs with ⟨xs, ⟨a, ha⟩⟩,
cases ha,
{ rw ha at *,
rcases dense xs with ⟨b, ⟨ab, bx⟩⟩,
have xb_pos : x - b > 0 := zero_lt_sub_iff_lt.2 bx,
have xxb : x - (x - b) = b := sub_sub_cancel (by rwa lt_top_iff_ne_top) (le_of_lt bx),
refine infi_le_of_le (x - b) (infi_le_of_le xb_pos _),
simp only [mem_principal_sets, le_principal_iff],
assume y, rintros ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rw xxb at h₁, calc a < b : ab ... ≤ y : h₁ },
{ rw ha at *,
rcases dense xs with ⟨b, ⟨xb, ba⟩⟩,
have bx_pos : b - x > 0 := zero_lt_sub_iff_lt.2 xb,
have xbx : x + (b - x) = b := add_sub_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt xb),
refine infi_le_of_le (b - x) (infi_le_of_le bx_pos _),
simp only [mem_principal_sets, le_principal_iff],
assume y, rintros ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rw xbx at h₂, calc y ≤ b : h₂ ... < a : ba },
end
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ennreal` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : filter α} {u : α → ennreal} {a : ennreal} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, {x | (u x) ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)} ∈ f :=
by simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_infi, tendsto_principal, mem_Icc]
protected lemma tendsto_at_top [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → ennreal} {a : ennreal}
(ha : a ≠ ⊤) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀n≥N, (f n) ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
by simp only [ennreal.tendsto_nhds ha, mem_at_top_sets, mem_set_of_eq]
lemma tendsto_coe_nnreal_nhds_top {α} {l : filter α} {f : α → nnreal} (h : tendsto f l at_top) :
tendsto (λa, (f a : ennreal)) l (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n,
have {a : α | ↑(n+1) ≤ f a} ∈ l := h $ mem_at_top _,
mem_sets_of_superset this $ assume a (ha : ↑(n+1) ≤ f a),
begin
rw [← coe_nat],
dsimp,
exact coe_lt_coe.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat.cast_lt.2 (nat.lt_succ_self _)) ha)
end
instance : topological_add_monoid ennreal :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $
have hl : ∀a:ennreal, tendsto (λ (p : ennreal × ennreal), p.fst + p.snd) (𝓝 (⊤, a)) (𝓝 ⊤), from
assume a, tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n,
have set.prod {a | ↑n < a } univ ∈ 𝓝 ((⊤:ennreal), a), from
prod_mem_nhds_sets (lt_mem_nhds $ coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_top) univ_mem_sets,
show {a : ennreal × ennreal | ↑n < a.fst + a.snd} ∈ 𝓝 (⊤, a),
begin filter_upwards [this] assume ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le h₁ (le_add_right $ le_refl _) end,
begin
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩,
cases a₁, { simp [continuous_at, none_eq_top, hl a₂], },
cases a₂, { simp [continuous_at, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, nhds_swap (a₁ : ennreal) ⊤,
tendsto_map'_iff, (∘), hl ↑a₁] },
simp [continuous_at, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
simp only [coe_add.symm, tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
end ⟩
protected lemma tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto (λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
have ht : ∀b:ennreal, b ≠ 0 → tendsto (λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 ((⊤:ennreal), b)) (𝓝 ⊤),
begin
refine assume b hb, tendsto_nhds_top $ assume n, _,
rcases dense (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε', hε', hεb'⟩,
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hεb' with ⟨ε, rfl, h⟩,
rcases exists_nat_gt (↑n / ε) with ⟨m, hm⟩,
have hε : ε > 0, from coe_lt_coe.1 hε',
refine mem_sets_of_superset (prod_mem_nhds_sets (lt_mem_nhds $ @coe_lt_top m) (lt_mem_nhds $ h)) _,
rintros ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
dsimp at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
calc (n:ennreal) = ↑(((n:nnreal) / ε) * ε) :
begin
simp [nnreal.div_def],
rw [mul_assoc, ← coe_mul, nnreal.inv_mul_cancel, coe_one, ← coe_nat, mul_one],
exact zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.1 hε
end
... < (↑m * ε : nnreal) : coe_lt_coe.2 $ mul_lt_mul hm (le_refl _) hε (nat.cast_nonneg _)
... ≤ a₁ * a₂ : by rw [coe_mul]; exact canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul
(le_of_lt h₁)
(le_of_lt h₂)
end,
begin
cases a, {simp [none_eq_top] at hb, simp [none_eq_top, ht b hb, top_mul, hb] },
cases b, {
simp [none_eq_top] at ha,
have ha' : a ≠ 0, from mt coe_eq_coe.2 ha,
simp [*, nhds_swap (a : ennreal) ⊤, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, top_mul, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘), mul_comm] },
simp [some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)],
simp only [coe_mul.symm, tendsto_coe, tendsto_mul]
end
protected lemma tendsto.mul {f : filter α} {ma : α → ennreal} {mb : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hma : tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) (hmb : tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) :
tendsto (λa, ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show tendsto ((λp:ennreal×ennreal, p.1 * p.2) ∘ (λa, (ma a, mb a))) f (𝓝 (a * b)), from
tendsto.comp (ennreal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (tendsto_prod_mk_nhds hma hmb)
protected lemma tendsto.const_mul {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hm : tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ⊤) : tendsto (λb, a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases
(assume : a = 0, by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds])
(assume ha : a ≠ 0, ennreal.tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (or.inl ha) hm hb)
protected lemma tendsto.mul_const {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a b : ennreal}
(hm : tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ⊤) : tendsto (λx, m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using ennreal.tendsto.const_mul hm ha
protected lemma continuous_const_mul {a : ennreal} (ha : a < ⊤) : continuous ((*) a) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id $ or.inr $ ne_of_lt ha
protected lemma continuous_mul_const {a : ennreal} (ha : a < ⊤) : continuous (λ x, x * a) :=
by simpa only [mul_comm] using ennreal.continuous_const_mul ha
protected lemma continuous_inv : continuous (has_inv.inv : ennreal → ennreal) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ a, tendsto_order.2
⟨begin
assume b hb,
simp only [@ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv b],
exact gt_mem_nhds (ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv.1 hb),
end,
begin
assume b hb,
simp only [gt_iff_lt, @ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt _ b],
exact lt_mem_nhds (ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt.1 hb)
end⟩
@[simp] protected lemma tendsto_inv_iff {f : filter α} {m : α → ennreal} {a : ennreal} :
tendsto (λ x, (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [function.comp, ennreal.inv_inv]
using (ennreal.continuous_inv.tendsto a⁻¹).comp h,
(ennreal.continuous_inv.tendsto a).comp⟩
protected lemma tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : ennreal)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
ennreal.inv_top ▸ ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
lemma Sup_add {s : set ennreal} (hs : s ≠ ∅) : Sup s + a = ⨆b∈s, b + a :=
have Sup ((λb, b + a) '' s) = Sup s + a,
from is_lub_iff_Sup_eq.mp $ is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _ h, add_le_add' h (le_refl _))
is_lub_Sup
hs
(tendsto.add (tendsto_id' inf_le_left) tendsto_const_nhds),
by simp [Sup_image, -add_comm] at this; exact this.symm
lemma supr_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ennreal} [h : nonempty ι] : supr s + a = ⨆b, s b + a :=
let ⟨x⟩ := h in
calc supr s + a = Sup (range s) + a : by simp [Sup_range]
... = (⨆b∈range s, b + a) : Sup_add $ ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.mpr ⟨s x, x, rfl⟩
... = _ : by simp [supr_range, -mem_range]
lemma add_supr {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ennreal} [h : nonempty ι] : a + supr s = ⨆b, a + s b :=
by rw [add_comm, supr_add]; simp
lemma supr_add_supr {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ennreal} (h : ∀i j, ∃k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
supr f + supr g = (⨆ a, f a + g a) :=
begin
by_cases hι : nonempty ι,
{ letI := hι,
refine le_antisymm _ (supr_le $ λ a, add_le_add' (le_supr _ _) (le_supr _ _)),
simpa [add_supr, supr_add] using
λ i j:ι, show f i + g j ≤ ⨆ a, f a + g a, from
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h i j in le_supr_of_le k hk },
{ have : ∀f:ι → ennreal, (⨆i, f i) = 0 := assume f, bot_unique (supr_le $ assume i, (hι ⟨i⟩).elim),
rw [this, this, this, zero_add] }
end
lemma supr_add_supr_of_monotone {ι : Sort*} [semilattice_sup ι]
{f g : ι → ennreal} (hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) :
supr f + supr g = (⨆ a, f a + g a) :=
supr_add_supr $ assume i j, ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add' (hf $ le_sup_left) (hg $ le_sup_right)⟩
lemma finset_sum_supr_nat {α} {ι} [semilattice_sup ι] {s : finset α} {f : α → ι → ennreal}
(hf : ∀a, monotone (f a)) :
s.sum (λa, supr (f a)) = (⨆ n, s.sum (λa, f a n)) :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on s _ _,
{ simp,
exact (bot_unique $ supr_le $ assume i, le_refl ⊥).symm },
{ assume a s has ih,
simp only [finset.sum_insert has],
rw [ih, supr_add_supr_of_monotone (hf a)],
assume i j h,
exact (finset.sum_le_sum $ assume a ha, hf a h) }
end
section priority
-- for some reason the next proof fails without changing the priority of this instance
local attribute [instance, priority 1000] classical.prop_decidable
lemma mul_Sup {s : set ennreal} {a : ennreal} : a * Sup s = ⨆i∈s, a * i :=
begin
by_cases hs : ∀x∈s, x = (0:ennreal),
{ have h₁ : Sup s = 0 := (bot_unique $ Sup_le $ assume a ha, (hs a ha).symm ▸ le_refl 0),
have h₂ : (⨆i ∈ s, a * i) = 0 :=
(bot_unique $ supr_le $ assume a, supr_le $ assume ha, by simp [hs a ha]),
rw [h₁, h₂, mul_zero] },
{ simp only [not_forall] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx, hx0⟩,
have s₀ : s ≠ ∅ := not_eq_empty_iff_exists.2 ⟨x, hx⟩,
have s₁ : Sup s ≠ 0 :=
zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le (zero_lt_iff_ne_zero.2 hx0) (le_Sup hx)),
have : Sup ((λb, a * b) '' s) = a * Sup s :=
is_lub_iff_Sup_eq.mp (is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _ h, canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) h)
is_lub_Sup
s₀
(ennreal.tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_id' inf_le_left) (or.inl s₁))),
rw [this.symm, Sup_image] }
end
end priority
lemma mul_supr {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ennreal} {a : ennreal} : a * supr f = ⨆i, a * f i :=
by rw [← Sup_range, mul_Sup, supr_range]
lemma supr_mul {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ennreal} {a : ennreal} : supr f * a = ⨆i, f i * a :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_supr]; congr; funext; rw [mul_comm]
protected lemma tendsto_coe_sub : ∀{b:ennreal}, tendsto (λb:ennreal, ↑r - b) (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (↑r - b)) :=
begin
refine (forall_ennreal.2 $ and.intro (assume a, _) _),
{ simp [@nhds_coe a, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘), tendsto_coe, coe_sub.symm],
exact nnreal.tendsto.sub tendsto_const_nhds tendsto_id },
simp,
exact (tendsto.congr' (mem_sets_of_superset (lt_mem_nhds $ @coe_lt_top r) $
by simp [le_of_lt] {contextual := tt})) tendsto_const_nhds
end
lemma sub_supr {ι : Sort*} [hι : nonempty ι] {b : ι → ennreal} (hr : a < ⊤) :
a - (⨆i, b i) = (⨅i, a - b i) :=
let ⟨i⟩ := hι in
let ⟨r, eq, _⟩ := lt_iff_exists_coe.mp hr in
have Inf ((λb, ↑r - b) '' range b) = ↑r - (⨆i, b i),
from is_glb_iff_Inf_eq.mp $ is_glb_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(assume x _ y _, sub_le_sub (le_refl _))
is_lub_supr
(ne_empty_of_mem ⟨i, rfl⟩)
(tendsto.comp ennreal.tendsto_coe_sub (tendsto_id' inf_le_left)),
by rw [eq, ←this]; simp [Inf_image, infi_range, -mem_range]; exact le_refl _
end topological_space
section tsum
variables {f g : α → ennreal}
@[elim_cast] protected lemma has_sum_coe {f : α → nnreal} {r : nnreal} :
has_sum (λa, (f a : ennreal)) ↑r ↔ has_sum f r :=
have (λs:finset α, s.sum (coe ∘ f)) = (coe : nnreal → ennreal) ∘ (λs:finset α, s.sum f),
from funext $ assume s, ennreal.coe_finset_sum.symm,
by unfold has_sum; rw [this, tendsto_coe]
protected lemma tsum_coe_eq {f : α → nnreal} (h : has_sum f r) : (∑a, (f a : ennreal)) = r :=
tsum_eq_has_sum $ ennreal.has_sum_coe.2 $ h
protected lemma coe_tsum {f : α → nnreal} : summable f → ↑(tsum f) = (∑a, (f a : ennreal))
| ⟨r, hr⟩ := by rw [tsum_eq_has_sum hr, ennreal.tsum_coe_eq hr]
protected lemma has_sum : has_sum f (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) :=
tendsto_order.2
⟨assume a' ha',
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := lt_supr_iff.mp ha' in
mem_at_top_sets.mpr ⟨s, assume t ht, lt_of_lt_of_le hs $ finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset ht⟩,
assume a' ha',
univ_mem_sets' $ assume s,
have s.sum f ≤ ⨆(s : finset α), s.sum f,
from le_supr (λ(s : finset α), s.sum f) s,
lt_of_le_of_lt this ha'⟩
@[simp] protected lemma summable : summable f := ⟨_, ennreal.has_sum⟩
lemma tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable {f : β → nnreal} :
(∑ b, (f b:ennreal)) ≠ ∞ ↔ summable f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, ennreal.coe_tsum h ▸ ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩,
lift (∑ b, (f b:ennreal)) to nnreal using h with a ha,
refine ⟨a, ennreal.has_sum_coe.1 _⟩,
rw ha,
exact has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable
end
protected lemma tsum_eq_supr_sum : (∑a, f a) = (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) :=
tsum_eq_has_sum ennreal.has_sum
protected lemma tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top : (∃ a, f a = ∞) → (∑ a, f a) = ∞
| ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
begin
rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum],
apply le_antisymm le_top,
convert le_supr (λ s:finset α, s.sum f) (finset.singleton a),
rw [finset.sum_singleton, ha]
end
protected lemma ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (h : (∑ a, f a) ≠ ∞) (a : α) : f a ≠ ∞ :=
λ ha, h $ ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, ha⟩
protected lemma tsum_sigma {β : α → Type*} (f : Πa, β a → ennreal) :
(∑p:Σa, β a, f p.1 p.2) = (∑a b, f a b) :=
tsum_sigma (assume b, ennreal.summable) ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_prod {f : α → β → ennreal} : (∑p:α×β, f p.1 p.2) = (∑a, ∑b, f a b) :=
let j : α × β → (Σa:α, β) := λp, sigma.mk p.1 p.2 in
let i : (Σa:α, β) → α × β := λp, (p.1, p.2) in
let f' : (Σa:α, β) → ennreal := λp, f p.1 p.2 in
calc (∑p:α×β, f' (j p)) = (∑p:Σa:α, β, f p.1 p.2) :
tsum_eq_tsum_of_iso j i (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl)
... = (∑a, ∑b, f a b) : ennreal.tsum_sigma f
protected lemma tsum_comm {f : α → β → ennreal} : (∑a, ∑b, f a b) = (∑b, ∑a, f a b) :=
let f' : α×β → ennreal := λp, f p.1 p.2 in
calc (∑a, ∑b, f a b) = (∑p:α×β, f' p) : ennreal.tsum_prod.symm
... = (∑p:β×α, f' (prod.swap p)) :
(tsum_eq_tsum_of_iso prod.swap (@prod.swap α β) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl) (assume ⟨a, b⟩, rfl)).symm
... = (∑b, ∑a, f' (prod.swap (b, a))) : @ennreal.tsum_prod β α (λb a, f' (prod.swap (b, a)))
protected lemma tsum_add : (∑a, f a + g a) = (∑a, f a) + (∑a, g a) :=
tsum_add ennreal.summable ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀a, f a ≤ g a) : (∑a, f a) ≤ (∑a, g a) :=
tsum_le_tsum h ennreal.summable ennreal.summable
protected lemma tsum_eq_supr_nat {f : ℕ → ennreal} :
(∑i:ℕ, f i) = (⨆i:ℕ, (finset.range i).sum f) :=
calc _ = (⨆s:finset ℕ, s.sum f) : ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum
... = (⨆i:ℕ, (finset.range i).sum f) : le_antisymm
(supr_le_supr2 $ assume s,
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := finset.exists_nat_subset_range s in
⟨n, finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset hn⟩)
(supr_le_supr2 $ assume i, ⟨finset.range i, le_refl _⟩)
protected lemma le_tsum (a : α) : f a ≤ (∑a, f a) :=
calc f a = ({a} : finset α).sum f : by simp
... ≤ (⨆s:finset α, s.sum f) : le_supr (λs:finset α, s.sum f) _
... = (∑a, f a) : by rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum]
protected lemma mul_tsum : (∑i, a * f i) = a * (∑i, f i) :=
if h : ∀i, f i = 0 then by simp [h] else
let ⟨i, (hi : f i ≠ 0)⟩ := classical.not_forall.mp h in
have sum_ne_0 : (∑i, f i) ≠ 0, from ne_of_gt $
calc 0 < f i : lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) hi.symm
... ≤ (∑i, f i) : ennreal.le_tsum _,
have tendsto (λs:finset α, s.sum ((*) a ∘ f)) at_top (𝓝 (a * (∑i, f i))),
by rw [← show (*) a ∘ (λs:finset α, s.sum f) = λs, s.sum ((*) a ∘ f),
from funext $ λ s, finset.mul_sum];
exact ennreal.tendsto.const_mul (has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable) (or.inl sum_ne_0),
tsum_eq_has_sum this
protected lemma tsum_mul : (∑i, f i * a) = (∑i, f i) * a :=
by simp [mul_comm, ennreal.mul_tsum]
@[simp] lemma tsum_supr_eq {α : Type*} (a : α) {f : α → ennreal} :
(∑b:α, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) = f a :=
le_antisymm
(by rw [ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum]; exact supr_le (assume s,
calc s.sum (λb, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) ≤ (finset.singleton a).sum (λb, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) :
finset.sum_le_sum_of_ne_zero $ assume b _ hb,
suffices a = b, by simpa using this.symm,
classical.by_contradiction $ assume h,
by simpa [h] using hb
... = f a : by simp))
(calc f a ≤ (⨆ (h : a = a), f a) : le_supr (λh:a=a, f a) rfl
... ≤ (∑b:α, ⨆ (h : a = b), f b) : ennreal.le_tsum _)
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ennreal} (r : ennreal) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
begin
refine ⟨tendsto_sum_nat_of_has_sum, assume h, _⟩,
rw [← supr_eq_of_tendsto _ h, ← ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat],
{ exact has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable },
{ exact assume s t hst, finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset (finset.range_subset.2 hst) }
end
end tsum
end ennreal
namespace nnreal
lemma exists_le_has_sum_of_le {f g : β → nnreal} {r : nnreal}
(hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) (hfr : has_sum f r) : ∃p≤r, has_sum g p :=
have (∑b, (g b : ennreal)) ≤ r,
begin
refine has_sum_le (assume b, _) (has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable) (ennreal.has_sum_coe.2 hfr),
exact ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 (hgf _)
end,
let ⟨p, eq, hpr⟩ := ennreal.le_coe_iff.1 this in
⟨p, hpr, ennreal.has_sum_coe.1 $ eq ▸ has_sum_tsum ennreal.summable⟩
lemma summable_of_le {f g : β → nnreal} (hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) : summable f → summable g
| ⟨r, hfr⟩ := let ⟨p, _, hp⟩ := exists_le_has_sum_of_le hgf hfr in summable_spec hp
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → nnreal} (r : nnreal) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
begin
rw [← ennreal.has_sum_coe, ennreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat],
simp only [ennreal.coe_finset_sum.symm],
exact ennreal.tendsto_coe
end
end nnreal
lemma summable_of_nonneg_of_le {f g : β → ℝ}
(hg : ∀b, 0 ≤ g b) (hgf : ∀b, g b ≤ f b) (hf : summable f) : summable g :=
let f' (b : β) : nnreal := ⟨f b, le_trans (hg b) (hgf b)⟩ in
let g' (b : β) : nnreal := ⟨g b, hg b⟩ in
have summable f', from nnreal.summable_coe.1 hf,
have summable g', from
nnreal.summable_of_le (assume b, (@nnreal.coe_le (g' b) (f' b)).2 $ hgf b) this,
show summable (λb, g' b : β → ℝ), from nnreal.summable_coe.2 this
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀i, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
has_sum f r ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, (finset.range n).sum f) at_top (𝓝 r) :=
⟨tendsto_sum_nat_of_has_sum,
assume hfr,
have 0 ≤ r := ge_of_tendsto at_top_ne_bot hfr $ univ_mem_sets' $ assume i,
show 0 ≤ (finset.range i).sum f, from finset.sum_nonneg $ assume i _, hf i,
let f' (n : ℕ) : nnreal := ⟨f n, hf n⟩, r' : nnreal := ⟨r, this⟩ in
have f_eq : f = (λi:ℕ, (f' i : ℝ)) := rfl,
have r_eq : r = r' := rfl,
begin
rw [f_eq, r_eq, nnreal.has_sum_coe, nnreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat, ← nnreal.tendsto_coe],
simp only [nnreal.coe_sum],
exact hfr
end⟩
lemma infi_real_pos_eq_infi_nnreal_pos {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ℝ → α} :
(⨅(n:ℝ) (h : n > 0), f n) = (⨅(n:nnreal) (h : n > 0), f n) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume n, le_infi $ assume hn, infi_le_of_le n $ infi_le _ (nnreal.coe_pos.2 hn))
(le_infi $ assume r, le_infi $ assume hr, infi_le_of_le ⟨r, le_of_lt hr⟩ $ infi_le _ hr)
section
variables [emetric_space β]
open lattice ennreal filter emetric
/-- In an emetric ball, the distance between points is everywhere finite -/
lemma edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball {a : β} {r : ennreal} (x y : ball a r) : edist x.1 y.1 ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 $
calc edist x y ≤ edist a x + edist a y : edist_triangle_left x.1 y.1 a
... < r + r : by rw [edist_comm a x, edist_comm a y]; exact add_lt_add x.2 y.2
... ≤ ⊤ : le_top
/-- Each ball in an extended metric space gives us a metric space, as the edist
is everywhere finite. -/
def metric_space_emetric_ball (a : β) (r : ennreal) : metric_space (ball a r) :=
emetric_space.to_metric_space edist_ne_top_of_mem_ball
local attribute [instance] metric_space_emetric_ball
lemma nhds_eq_nhds_emetric_ball (a x : β) (r : ennreal) (h : x ∈ ball a r) :
𝓝 x = map (coe : ball a r → β) (𝓝 ⟨x, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val_eq _ $ mem_nhds_sets emetric.is_open_ball h).symm
end
section
variable [emetric_space α]
open emetric
/-- Yet another metric characterization of Cauchy sequences on integers. This one is often the
most efficient. -/
lemma emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0 [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β] {s : β → α} :
cauchy_seq s ↔ (∃ (b: β → ennreal), (∀ n m N : β, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N)
∧ (tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0))) :=
⟨begin
assume hs,
rw emetric.cauchy_seq_iff at hs,
/- `s` is Cauchy sequence. The sequence `b` will be constructed by taking
the supremum of the distances between `s n` and `s m` for `n m ≥ N`-/
let b := λN, Sup ((λ(p : β × β), edist (s p.1) (s p.2))''{p | p.1 ≥ N ∧ p.2 ≥ N}),
--Prove that it bounds the distances of points in the Cauchy sequence
have C : ∀ n m N, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N,
{ refine λm n N hm hn, le_Sup _,
use (prod.mk m n),
simp only [and_true, eq_self_iff_true, set.mem_set_of_eq],
exact ⟨hm, hn⟩ },
--Prove that it tends to `0`, by using the Cauchy property of `s`
have D : tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0),
{ refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨λa ha, absurd ha (ennreal.not_lt_zero), λε εpos, _⟩,
rcases dense εpos with ⟨δ, δpos, δlt⟩,
rcases hs δ δpos with ⟨N, hN⟩,
refine filter.mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨N, λn hn, _⟩,
have : b n ≤ δ := Sup_le begin
simp only [and_imp, set.mem_image, set.mem_set_of_eq, exists_imp_distrib, prod.exists],
intros d p q hp hq hd,
rw ← hd,
exact le_of_lt (hN q p (le_trans hn hq) (le_trans hn hp))
end,
simpa using lt_of_le_of_lt this δlt },
-- Conclude
exact ⟨b, ⟨C, D⟩⟩
end,
begin
rintros ⟨b, ⟨b_bound, b_lim⟩⟩,
/-b : ℕ → ℝ, b_bound : ∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N,
b_lim : tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0)-/
refine emetric.cauchy_seq_iff.2 (λε εpos, _),
have : {n | b n < ε} ∈ at_top := (tendsto_order.1 b_lim ).2 _ εpos,
rcases filter.mem_at_top_sets.1 this with ⟨N, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, λm n hm hn, calc
edist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N : b_bound n m N hn hm
... < ε : (hN _ (le_refl N)) ⟩
end⟩
lemma continuous_of_le_add_edist {f : α → ennreal} (C : ennreal)
(hC : C ≠ ⊤) (h : ∀x y, f x ≤ f y + C * edist x y) : continuous f :=
begin
refine continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 (λx, tendsto_order.2 ⟨_, _⟩),
show ∀e, e < f x → {y : α | e < f y} ∈ 𝓝 x,
{ assume e he,
let ε := min (f x - e) 1,
have : ε < ⊤ := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]),
have : 0 < ε := by simp [ε, hC, he, ennreal.zero_lt_one],
have : 0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2) := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 (by simp [hC, (ne_of_lt this).symm, ennreal.mul_eq_zero]),
have I : C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) < ε,
{ by_cases C_zero : C = 0,
{ simp [C_zero, ‹0 < ε›] },
{ calc C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) = (C * C⁻¹) * (ε/2) : by simp [mul_assoc]
... = ε/2 : by simp [ennreal.mul_inv_cancel C_zero hC]
... < ε : ennreal.half_lt_self (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.1 ‹0 < ε›) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ‹ε < ⊤›) }},
have : ball x (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) ⊆ {y : α | e < f y},
{ rintros y hy,
by_cases htop : f y = ⊤,
{ simp [htop, lt_top_iff_ne_top, ne_top_of_lt he] },
{ simp at hy,
have : e + ε < f y + ε := calc
e + ε ≤ e + (f x - e) : add_le_add_left' (min_le_left _ _)
... = f x : by simp [le_of_lt he]
... ≤ f y + C * edist x y : h x y
... = f y + C * edist y x : by simp [edist_comm]
... ≤ f y + C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) :
add_le_add_left' $ canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (le_of_lt hy)
... < f y + ε : (ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 htop)).2 I,
show e < f y, from
(ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_right ‹ε < ⊤›).1 this }},
apply filter.mem_sets_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ (‹0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2)›)) this },
show ∀e, f x < e → {y : α | f y < e} ∈ 𝓝 x,
{ assume e he,
let ε := min (e - f x) 1,
have : ε < ⊤ := lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) (by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]),
have : 0 < ε := by simp [ε, he, ennreal.zero_lt_one],
have : 0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2) := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 (by simp [hC, (ne_of_lt this).symm, ennreal.mul_eq_zero]),
have I : C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) < ε,
{ by_cases C_zero : C = 0,
simp [C_zero, ‹0 < ε›],
calc C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) = (C * C⁻¹) * (ε/2) : by simp [mul_assoc]
... = ε/2 : by simp [ennreal.mul_inv_cancel C_zero hC]
... < ε : ennreal.half_lt_self (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.1 ‹0 < ε›) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ‹ε < ⊤›) },
have : ball x (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) ⊆ {y : α | f y < e},
{ rintros y hy,
have htop : f x ≠ ⊤ := ne_top_of_lt he,
show f y < e, from calc
f y ≤ f x + C * edist y x : h y x
... ≤ f x + C * (C⁻¹ * (ε/2)) :
add_le_add_left' $ canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul (le_refl _) (le_of_lt hy)
... < f x + ε : (ennreal.add_lt_add_iff_left (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 htop)).2 I
... ≤ f x + (e - f x) : add_le_add_left' (min_le_left _ _)
... = e : by simp [le_of_lt he] },
apply filter.mem_sets_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ (‹0 < C⁻¹ * (ε/2)›)) this },
end
theorem continuous_edist' : continuous (λp:α×α, edist p.1 p.2) :=
begin
apply continuous_of_le_add_edist 2 (by simp),
rintros ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨x', y'⟩,
calc edist x y ≤ edist x x' + edist x' y' + edist y' y : edist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
... = edist x' y' + (edist x x' + edist y y') : by simp [add_comm, edist_comm]
... ≤ edist x' y' + (edist (x, y) (x', y') + edist (x, y) (x', y')) :
add_le_add_left' (add_le_add' (by simp [edist, le_refl]) (by simp [edist, le_refl]))
... = edist x' y' + 2 * edist (x, y) (x', y') : by rw [← mul_two, mul_comm]
end
theorem continuous_edist [topological_space β] {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, edist (f b) (g b)) :=
continuous_edist'.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
theorem tendsto_edist {f g : β → α} {x : filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
tendsto (λx, edist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (edist a b)) :=
have tendsto (λp:α×α, edist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (edist a b)),
from continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp continuous_edist' (a, b),
tendsto.comp (by rw [nhds_prod_eq] at this; exact this) (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : tsum d ≠ ∞) :
cauchy_seq f :=
begin
lift d to (ℕ → nnreal) using (λ i, ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hd i),
rw ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable at hd,
exact cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_summable d hf hd
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded above by a function `d : ℕ → ennreal`,
then the distance from `f n` to the limit is bounded by `∑_{k=n}^∞ d k`. -/
lemma edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
{a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ ∑ m, d (n + m) :=
begin
refine le_of_tendsto at_top_ne_bot (tendsto_edist tendsto_const_nhds ha)
(mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨n, λ m hnm, _⟩),
refine le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le hnm (λ k _ _, hf k)) _,
rw [finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range],
exact sum_le_tsum _ (λ _ _, zero_le _) ennreal.summable
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded above by a function `d : ℕ → ennreal`,
then the distance from `f 0` to the limit is bounded by `∑_{k=0}^∞ d k`. -/
lemma edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto₀ {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ennreal)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
{a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ ∑ m, d m :=
by simpa using edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto d hf ha 0
end --section
|
731dcd2049024b544f57803d2a16a068bd1d2b7f | 8d65764a9e5f0923a67fc435eb1a5a1d02fd80e3 | /src/data/polynomial/eval.lean | 366b55027ca3a83301a343d49a6ac4b9c5f6d2c5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | troyjlee/mathlib | e18d4b8026e32062ab9e89bc3b003a5d1cfec3f5 | 45e7eb8447555247246e3fe91c87066506c14875 | refs/heads/master | 1,689,248,035,046 | 1,629,470,528,000 | 1,629,470,528,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 28,283 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import data.polynomial.degree.definitions
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The main defs here are `eval₂`, `eval`, and `map`.
We give several lemmas about their interaction with each other and with module operations.
-/
noncomputable theory
open finset add_monoid_algebra
open_locale big_operators
namespace polynomial
universes u v w y
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section semiring
variables [semiring R] {p q r : polynomial R}
section
variables [semiring S]
variables (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` given a ring hom `f` from the scalar ring
to the target and a value `x` for the variable in the target -/
def eval₂ (p : polynomial R) : S :=
p.sum (λ e a, f a * x ^ e)
lemma eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum (λ e a, f a * x ^ e) := rfl
lemma eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S]
{f g : R →+* S} {s t : S} {φ ψ : polynomial R} :
f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ :=
by rintro rfl rfl rfl; refl
@[simp] lemma eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) :=
by simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero, mul_one, sum, not_not, mem_support_iff,
sum_ite_eq', ite_eq_left_iff, ring_hom.map_zero, implies_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
{contextual := tt}
@[simp] lemma eval₂_zero : (0 : polynomial R).eval₂ f x = 0 :=
by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a :=
by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_X : X.eval₂ f x = x :=
by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (monomial n r).eval₂ f x = (f r) * x^n :=
by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X^n).eval₂ f x = x^n :=
begin
rw X_pow_eq_monomial,
convert eval₂_monomial f x,
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x + q.eval₂ f x :=
by { apply sum_add_index; simp [add_mul] }
@[simp] lemma eval₂_one : (1 : polynomial R).eval₂ f x = 1 :=
by rw [← C_1, eval₂_C, f.map_one]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval₂ f x = bit0 (p.eval₂ f x) :=
by rw [bit0, eval₂_add, bit0]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval₂ f x = bit1 (p.eval₂ f x) :=
by rw [bit1, eval₂_add, eval₂_bit0, eval₂_one, bit1]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_smul (g : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) (x : S) {s : R} :
eval₂ g x (s • p) = g s * eval₂ g x p :=
begin
have A : p.nat_degree < p.nat_degree.succ := nat.lt_succ_self _,
have B : (s • p).nat_degree < p.nat_degree.succ := (nat_degree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt A,
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum, sum_over_range' _ _ _ A, sum_over_range' _ _ _ B];
simp [mul_sum, mul_assoc],
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_C_X : eval₂ C X p = p :=
polynomial.induction_on' p (λ p q hp hq, by simp [hp, hq])
(λ n x, by rw [eval₂_monomial, monomial_eq_smul_X, C_mul'])
/-- `eval₂_add_monoid_hom (f : R →+* S) (x : S)` is the `add_monoid_hom` from
`polynomial R` to `S` obtained by evaluating the pushforward of `p` along `f` at `x`. -/
@[simps] def eval₂_add_monoid_hom : polynomial R →+ S :=
{ to_fun := eval₂ f x,
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _,
map_add' := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _ }
@[simp] lemma eval₂_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : (n : polynomial R).eval₂ f x = n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp only [eval₂_zero, nat.cast_zero] },
{ rw [n.cast_succ, eval₂_add, ih, eval₂_one, n.cast_succ] }
end
variables [semiring T]
lemma eval₂_sum (p : polynomial T) (g : ℕ → T → polynomial R) (x : S) :
(p.sum g).eval₂ f x = p.sum (λ n a, (g n a).eval₂ f x) :=
begin
let T : polynomial R →+ S :=
{ to_fun := eval₂ f x, map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _, map_add' := λ p q, eval₂_add _ _ },
have A : ∀ y, eval₂ f x y = T y := λ y, rfl,
simp only [A],
rw [sum, T.map_sum, sum]
end
lemma eval₂_finset_sum (s : finset ι) (g : ι → polynomial R) (x : S) :
(∑ i in s, g i).eval₂ f x = ∑ i in s, (g i).eval₂ f x :=
begin
classical,
induction s using finset.induction with p hp s hs, simp,
rw [sum_insert, eval₂_add, hs, sum_insert]; assumption,
end
lemma eval₂_to_finsupp_eq_lift_nc {f : R →+* S} {x : S} {p : add_monoid_algebra R ℕ} :
eval₂ f x (⟨p⟩ : polynomial R) = lift_nc ↑f (powers_hom S x) p :=
by { simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, sum_to_finsupp, support, coeff], refl }
lemma eval₂_mul_noncomm (hf : ∀ k, commute (f $ q.coeff k) x) :
eval₂ f x (p * q) = eval₂ f x p * eval₂ f x q :=
begin
rcases p, rcases q,
simp only [coeff] at hf,
simp only [mul_to_finsupp, eval₂_to_finsupp_eq_lift_nc],
exact lift_nc_mul _ _ p q (λ k n hn, (hf k).pow_right n)
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_mul_X : eval₂ f x (p * X) = eval₂ f x p * x :=
begin
refine trans (eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ $ λ k, _) (by rw eval₂_X),
rcases em (k = 1) with (rfl|hk),
{ simp },
{ simp [coeff_X_of_ne_one hk] }
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_X_mul : eval₂ f x (X * p) = eval₂ f x p * x :=
by rw [X_mul, eval₂_mul_X]
lemma eval₂_mul_C' (h : commute (f a) x) : eval₂ f x (p * C a) = eval₂ f x p * f a :=
begin
rw [eval₂_mul_noncomm, eval₂_C],
intro k,
by_cases hk : k = 0,
{ simp only [hk, h, coeff_C_zero, coeff_C_ne_zero] },
{ simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero hk, ring_hom.map_zero, commute.zero_left] }
end
lemma eval₂_list_prod_noncomm (ps : list (polynomial R))
(hf : ∀ (p ∈ ps) k, commute (f $ coeff p k) x) :
eval₂ f x ps.prod = (ps.map (polynomial.eval₂ f x)).prod :=
begin
induction ps using list.reverse_rec_on with ps p ihp,
{ simp },
{ simp only [list.forall_mem_append, list.forall_mem_singleton] at hf,
simp [eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ hf.2, ihp hf.1] }
end
/-- `eval₂` as a `ring_hom` for noncommutative rings -/
def eval₂_ring_hom' (f : R →+* S) (x : S) (hf : ∀ a, commute (f a) x) : polynomial R →+* S :=
{ to_fun := eval₂ f x,
map_add' := λ _ _, eval₂_add _ _,
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _,
map_mul' := λ p q, eval₂_mul_noncomm f x (λ k, hf $ coeff q k),
map_one' := eval₂_one _ _ }
end
/-!
We next prove that eval₂ is multiplicative
as long as target ring is commutative
(even if the source ring is not).
-/
section eval₂
variables [comm_semiring S]
variables (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
@[simp] lemma eval₂_mul : (p * q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x * q.eval₂ f x :=
eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ $ λ k, commute.all _ _
lemma eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left (q : polynomial R) (hp : p.eval₂ f x = 0) :
(p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 :=
begin
rw eval₂_mul f x,
exact mul_eq_zero_of_left hp (q.eval₂ f x)
end
lemma eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_right (p : polynomial R) (hq : q.eval₂ f x = 0) :
(p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 :=
begin
rw eval₂_mul f x,
exact mul_eq_zero_of_right (p.eval₂ f x) hq
end
/-- `eval₂` as a `ring_hom` -/
def eval₂_ring_hom (f : R →+* S) (x : S) : polynomial R →+* S :=
{ map_one' := eval₂_one _ _,
map_mul' := λ _ _, eval₂_mul _ _,
..eval₂_add_monoid_hom f x }
@[simp] lemma coe_eval₂_ring_hom (f : R →+* S) (x) : ⇑(eval₂_ring_hom f x) = eval₂ f x := rfl
lemma eval₂_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x ^ n := (eval₂_ring_hom _ _).map_pow _ _
lemma eval₂_eq_sum_range :
p.eval₂ f x = ∑ i in finset.range (p.nat_degree + 1), f (p.coeff i) * x^i :=
trans (congr_arg _ p.as_sum_range) (trans (eval₂_finset_sum f _ _ x) (congr_arg _ (by simp)))
lemma eval₂_eq_sum_range' (f : R →+* S) {p : polynomial R} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.nat_degree < n) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x p = ∑ i in finset.range n, f (p.coeff i) * x ^ i :=
begin
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, p.sum_over_range' _ _ hn],
intro i,
rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul]
end
lemma eval₂_dvd : p ∣ q → eval₂ f x p ∣ eval₂ f x q :=
(eval₂_ring_hom f x).map_dvd
lemma eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero (h : p ∣ q) (h0 : eval₂ f x p = 0) :
eval₂ f x q = 0 :=
zero_dvd_iff.mp (h0 ▸ eval₂_dvd f x h)
end eval₂
section eval
variables {x : R}
/-- `eval x p` is the evaluation of the polynomial `p` at `x` -/
def eval : R → polynomial R → R := eval₂ (ring_hom.id _)
lemma eval_eq_sum : p.eval x = p.sum (λ e a, a * x ^ e) :=
rfl
lemma eval_eq_finset_sum (p : polynomial R) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i in range (p.nat_degree + 1), p.coeff i * x ^ i :=
by { rw [eval_eq_sum, sum_over_range], simp }
lemma eval_eq_finset_sum' (P : polynomial R) :
(λ x, eval x P) = (λ x, ∑ i in range (P.nat_degree + 1), P.coeff i * x ^ i) :=
begin
ext,
exact P.eval_eq_finset_sum x
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_at_apply {S : Type*} [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (r : R) :
p.eval₂ f (f r) = f (p.eval r) :=
begin
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval_eq_sum, sum, sum, f.map_sum],
simp only [f.map_mul, f.map_pow],
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_at_one {S : Type*} [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) : p.eval₂ f 1 = f (p.eval 1) :=
begin
convert eval₂_at_apply f 1,
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma eval₂_at_nat_cast {S : Type*} [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) :
p.eval₂ f n = f (p.eval n) :=
begin
convert eval₂_at_apply f n,
simp,
end
@[simp] lemma eval_C : (C a).eval x = a := eval₂_C _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_nat_cast {n : ℕ} : (n : polynomial R).eval x = n :=
by simp only [←C_eq_nat_cast, eval_C]
@[simp] lemma eval_X : X.eval x = x := eval₂_X _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_monomial {n a} : (monomial n a).eval x = a * x^n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_zero : (0 : polynomial R).eval x = 0 := eval₂_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_add : (p + q).eval x = p.eval x + q.eval x := eval₂_add _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_one : (1 : polynomial R).eval x = 1 := eval₂_one _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval x = bit0 (p.eval x) := eval₂_bit0 _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval x = bit1 (p.eval x) := eval₂_bit1 _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_smul (p : polynomial R) (x : R) {s : R} :
(s • p).eval x = s * p.eval x :=
eval₂_smul (ring_hom.id _) _ _
@[simp] lemma eval_C_mul : (C a * p).eval x = a * p.eval x :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q ph qh,
simp only [mul_add, eval_add, ph, qh], },
{ intros n b,
simp [mul_assoc], }
end
@[simp] lemma eval_nat_cast_mul {n : ℕ} : ((n : polynomial R) * p).eval x = n * p.eval x :=
by rw [←C_eq_nat_cast, eval_C_mul]
@[simp] lemma eval_mul_X : (p * X).eval x = p.eval x * x :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q ph qh,
simp only [add_mul, eval_add, ph, qh], },
{ intros n a,
simp only [←monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, eval_monomial,
mul_one, pow_succ', mul_assoc], }
end
@[simp] lemma eval_mul_X_pow {k : ℕ} : (p * X^k).eval x = p.eval x * x^k :=
begin
induction k with k ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [pow_succ', ←mul_assoc, ih], }
end
lemma eval_sum (p : polynomial R) (f : ℕ → R → polynomial R) (x : R) :
(p.sum f).eval x = p.sum (λ n a, (f n a).eval x) :=
eval₂_sum _ _ _ _
lemma eval_finset_sum (s : finset ι) (g : ι → polynomial R) (x : R) :
(∑ i in s, g i).eval x = ∑ i in s, (g i).eval x := eval₂_finset_sum _ _ _ _
/-- `is_root p x` implies `x` is a root of `p`. The evaluation of `p` at `x` is zero -/
def is_root (p : polynomial R) (a : R) : Prop := p.eval a = 0
instance [decidable_eq R] : decidable (is_root p a) := by unfold is_root; apply_instance
@[simp] lemma is_root.def : is_root p a ↔ p.eval a = 0 := iff.rfl
lemma coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero (p : polynomial R) :
coeff p 0 = p.eval 0 :=
calc coeff p 0 = coeff p 0 * 0 ^ 0 : by simp
... = p.eval 0 : eq.symm $
finset.sum_eq_single _ (λ b _ hb, by simp [zero_pow (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb)]) (by simp)
lemma zero_is_root_of_coeff_zero_eq_zero {p : polynomial R} (hp : p.coeff 0 = 0) :
is_root p 0 :=
by rwa coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero at hp
end eval
section comp
/-- The composition of polynomials as a polynomial. -/
def comp (p q : polynomial R) : polynomial R := p.eval₂ C q
lemma comp_eq_sum_left : p.comp q = p.sum (λ e a, C a * q ^ e) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_X : p.comp X = p :=
begin
simp only [comp, eval₂, ← monomial_eq_C_mul_X],
exact sum_monomial_eq _,
end
@[simp] lemma X_comp : X.comp p = p := eval₂_X _ _
@[simp] lemma comp_C : p.comp (C a) = C (p.eval a) :=
by simp [comp, (C : R →+* _).map_sum]
@[simp] lemma C_comp : (C a).comp p = C a := eval₂_C _ _
@[simp] lemma nat_cast_comp {n : ℕ} : (n : polynomial R).comp p = n :=
by rw [←C_eq_nat_cast, C_comp]
@[simp] lemma comp_zero : p.comp (0 : polynomial R) = C (p.eval 0) :=
by rw [← C_0, comp_C]
@[simp] lemma zero_comp : comp (0 : polynomial R) p = 0 :=
by rw [← C_0, C_comp]
@[simp] lemma comp_one : p.comp 1 = C (p.eval 1) :=
by rw [← C_1, comp_C]
@[simp] lemma one_comp : comp (1 : polynomial R) p = 1 :=
by rw [← C_1, C_comp]
@[simp] lemma add_comp : (p + q).comp r = p.comp r + q.comp r := eval₂_add _ _
@[simp] lemma monomial_comp (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).comp p = C a * p^n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
@[simp] lemma mul_X_comp : (p * X).comp r = p.comp r * r :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp only [hp, hq, add_mul, add_comp] },
{ intros n b, simp only [pow_succ', mul_assoc, monomial_mul_X, monomial_comp] }
end
@[simp] lemma X_pow_comp {k : ℕ} : (X^k).comp p = p^k :=
begin
induction k with k ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [pow_succ', mul_X_comp, ih], },
end
@[simp] lemma mul_X_pow_comp {k : ℕ} : (p * X^k).comp r = p.comp r * r^k :=
begin
induction k with k ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [ih, pow_succ', ←mul_assoc, mul_X_comp], },
end
@[simp] lemma C_mul_comp : (C a * p).comp r = C a * p.comp r :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp [hp, hq, mul_add], },
{ intros n b, simp [mul_assoc], }
end
@[simp] lemma nat_cast_mul_comp {n : ℕ} : ((n : polynomial R) * p).comp r = n * p.comp r :=
by rw [←C_eq_nat_cast, C_mul_comp, C_eq_nat_cast]
@[simp] lemma mul_comp {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (p q r : polynomial R) :
(p * q).comp r = p.comp r * q.comp r := eval₂_mul _ _
lemma prod_comp {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (s : multiset (polynomial R)) (p : polynomial R) :
s.prod.comp p = (s.map (λ q : polynomial R, q.comp p)).prod :=
(s.prod_hom (monoid_hom.mk (λ q : polynomial R, q.comp p) one_comp (λ q r, mul_comp q r p))).symm
@[simp] lemma pow_comp {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (p q : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
(p^n).comp q = (p.comp q)^n :=
((monoid_hom.mk (λ r : polynomial R, r.comp q)) one_comp (λ r s, mul_comp r s q)).map_pow p n
@[simp] lemma bit0_comp : comp (bit0 p : polynomial R) q = bit0 (p.comp q) :=
by simp only [bit0, add_comp]
@[simp] lemma bit1_comp : comp (bit1 p : polynomial R) q = bit1 (p.comp q) :=
by simp only [bit1, add_comp, bit0_comp, one_comp]
lemma comp_assoc {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (φ ψ χ : polynomial R) :
(φ.comp ψ).comp χ = φ.comp (ψ.comp χ) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on φ;
{ intros, simp only [add_comp, mul_comp, C_comp, X_comp, pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, *] at * }
end
end comp
section map
variables [semiring S]
variables (f : R →+* S)
/-- `map f p` maps a polynomial `p` across a ring hom `f` -/
def map : polynomial R → polynomial S := eval₂ (C.comp f) X
@[simp] lemma map_C : (C a).map f = C (f a) := eval₂_C _ _
@[simp] lemma map_X : X.map f = X := eval₂_X _ _
@[simp] lemma map_monomial {n a} : (monomial n a).map f = monomial n (f a) :=
begin
dsimp only [map],
rw [eval₂_monomial, monomial_eq_C_mul_X], refl,
end
@[simp] lemma map_zero : (0 : polynomial R).map f = 0 := eval₂_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma map_add : (p + q).map f = p.map f + q.map f := eval₂_add _ _
@[simp] lemma map_one : (1 : polynomial R).map f = 1 := eval₂_one _ _
@[simp] lemma map_mul : (p * q).map f = p.map f * q.map f :=
by { rw [map, eval₂_mul_noncomm], exact λ k, (commute_X _).symm }
@[simp] lemma map_smul (r : R) : (r • p).map f = f r • p.map f :=
by rw [map, eval₂_smul, ring_hom.comp_apply, C_mul']
/-- `polynomial.map` as a `ring_hom` -/
def map_ring_hom (f : R →+* S) : polynomial R →+* polynomial S :=
{ to_fun := polynomial.map f,
map_add' := λ _ _, map_add f,
map_zero' := map_zero f,
map_mul' := λ _ _, map_mul f,
map_one' := map_one f }
@[simp] lemma coe_map_ring_hom (f : R →+* S) : ⇑(map_ring_hom f) = map f := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : (n : polynomial R).map f = n :=
(map_ring_hom f).map_nat_cast n
@[simp]
lemma coeff_map (n : ℕ) : coeff (p.map f) n = f (coeff p n) :=
begin
rw [map, eval₂, coeff_sum, sum],
conv_rhs { rw [← sum_C_mul_X_eq p, coeff_sum, sum, ring_hom.map_sum], },
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ x hx, _),
simp [function.comp, coeff_C_mul_X, f.map_mul],
split_ifs; simp [f.map_zero],
end
lemma map_map [semiring T] (g : S →+* T)
(p : polynomial R) : (p.map f).map g = p.map (g.comp f) :=
ext (by simp [coeff_map])
@[simp] lemma map_id : p.map (ring_hom.id _) = p := by simp [polynomial.ext_iff, coeff_map]
lemma eval₂_eq_eval_map {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = (p.map f).eval x :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp [hp, hq], },
{ intros n r, simp, }
end
lemma map_injective (hf : function.injective f) : function.injective (map f) :=
λ p q h, ext $ λ m, hf $ by rw [← coeff_map f, ← coeff_map f, h]
lemma map_surjective (hf : function.surjective f) : function.surjective (map f) :=
λ p, polynomial.induction_on' p
(λ p q hp hq, let ⟨p', hp'⟩ := hp, ⟨q', hq'⟩ := hq in ⟨p' + q', by rw [map_add f, hp', hq']⟩)
(λ n s, let ⟨r, hr⟩ := hf s in ⟨monomial n r, by rw [map_monomial f, hr]⟩)
lemma degree_map_le (p : polynomial R) : degree (p.map f) ≤ degree p :=
begin
apply (degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 (λ m hm, _),
rw degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero at hm,
simp [hm m (le_refl _)],
end
lemma nat_degree_map_le (p : polynomial R) : nat_degree (p.map f) ≤ nat_degree p :=
nat_degree_le_nat_degree (degree_map_le f p)
variables {f}
lemma map_monic_eq_zero_iff (hp : p.monic) : p.map f = 0 ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 :=
⟨ λ hfp x, calc f x = f x * f p.leading_coeff : by simp only [mul_one, hp.leading_coeff, f.map_one]
... = f x * (p.map f).coeff p.nat_degree : congr_arg _ (coeff_map _ _).symm
... = 0 : by simp only [hfp, mul_zero, coeff_zero],
λ h, ext (λ n, by simp only [h, coeff_map, coeff_zero]) ⟩
lemma map_monic_ne_zero (hp : p.monic) [nontrivial S] : p.map f ≠ 0 :=
λ h, f.map_one_ne_zero ((map_monic_eq_zero_iff hp).mp h _)
lemma degree_map_eq_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S)
(hf : f (leading_coeff p) ≠ 0) : degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
le_antisymm (degree_map_le f _) $
have hp0 : p ≠ 0, from leading_coeff_ne_zero.mp (λ hp0, hf (trans (congr_arg _ hp0) f.map_zero)),
begin
rw [degree_eq_nat_degree hp0],
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero _,
rw [coeff_map], exact hf
end
lemma nat_degree_map_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S)
(hf : f (leading_coeff p) ≠ 0) : nat_degree (p.map f) = nat_degree p :=
nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero f hf)
lemma leading_coeff_map_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero (f : R →+* S)
(hf : f (leading_coeff p) ≠ 0) : leading_coeff (p.map f) = f (leading_coeff p) :=
begin
unfold leading_coeff,
rw [coeff_map, nat_degree_map_of_leading_coeff_ne_zero f hf],
end
variables (f)
@[simp] lemma map_ring_hom_id : map_ring_hom (ring_hom.id R) = ring_hom.id (polynomial R) :=
ring_hom.ext $ λ x, map_id
@[simp] lemma map_ring_hom_comp [semiring T] (f : S →+* T) (g : R →+* S) :
(map_ring_hom f).comp (map_ring_hom g) = map_ring_hom (f.comp g) :=
ring_hom.ext $ map_map g f
lemma map_list_prod (L : list (polynomial R)) : L.prod.map f = (L.map $ map f).prod :=
eq.symm $ list.prod_hom _ (map_ring_hom f).to_monoid_hom
@[simp] lemma map_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).map f = p.map f ^ n := (map_ring_hom f).map_pow _ _
lemma mem_map_srange {p : polynomial S} :
p ∈ (map_ring_hom f).srange ↔ ∀ n, p.coeff n ∈ f.srange :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩ n, rw [coe_map_ring_hom, coeff_map], exact set.mem_range_self _ },
{ intro h, rw p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow,
refine (map_ring_hom f).srange.sum_mem _,
intros i hi,
rcases h i with ⟨c, hc⟩,
use [C c * X^i],
rw [coe_map_ring_hom, map_mul, map_C, hc, map_pow, map_X] }
end
lemma mem_map_range {R S : Type*} [ring R] [ring S] (f : R →+* S)
{p : polynomial S} : p ∈ (map_ring_hom f).range ↔ ∀ n, p.coeff n ∈ f.range :=
mem_map_srange f
lemma eval₂_map [semiring T] (g : S →+* T) (x : T) :
(p.map f).eval₂ g x = p.eval₂ (g.comp f) x :=
begin
have A : nat_degree (p.map f) < p.nat_degree.succ :=
(nat_degree_map_le _ _).trans_lt (nat.lt_succ_self _),
conv_lhs { rw [eval₂_eq_sum], },
rw [sum_over_range' _ _ _ A],
{ simp only [coeff_map, eval₂_eq_sum, sum_over_range, forall_const, zero_mul, ring_hom.map_zero,
function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp] },
{ simp only [forall_const, zero_mul, ring_hom.map_zero] }
end
lemma eval_map (x : S) : (p.map f).eval x = p.eval₂ f x :=
eval₂_map f (ring_hom.id _) x
lemma map_sum {ι : Type*} (g : ι → polynomial R) (s : finset ι) :
(∑ i in s, g i).map f = ∑ i in s, (g i).map f :=
(map_ring_hom f).map_sum _ _
lemma map_comp (p q : polynomial R) : map f (p.comp q) = (map f p).comp (map f q) :=
polynomial.induction_on p
(by simp only [map_C, forall_const, C_comp, eq_self_iff_true])
(by simp only [map_add, add_comp, forall_const, implies_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
{contextual := tt})
(by simp only [pow_succ', ←mul_assoc, comp, forall_const, eval₂_mul_X, implies_true_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, map_X, map_mul] {contextual := tt})
@[simp]
lemma eval_zero_map (f : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) :
(p.map f).eval 0 = f (p.eval 0) :=
by simp [←coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero]
@[simp]
lemma eval_one_map (f : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) :
(p.map f).eval 1 = f (p.eval 1) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp only [hp, hq, map_add, ring_hom.map_add, eval_add] },
{ intros n r, simp only [one_pow, mul_one, eval_monomial, map_monomial] }
end
@[simp]
lemma eval_nat_cast_map (f : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) :
(p.map f).eval n = f (p.eval n) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp only [hp, hq, map_add, ring_hom.map_add, eval_add] },
{ intros n r, simp only [f.map_nat_cast, eval_monomial, map_monomial, f.map_pow, f.map_mul] }
end
@[simp]
lemma eval_int_cast_map {R S : Type*} [ring R] [ring S]
(f : R →+* S) (p : polynomial R) (i : ℤ) :
(p.map f).eval i = f (p.eval i) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros p q hp hq, simp only [hp, hq, map_add, ring_hom.map_add, eval_add] },
{ intros n r, simp only [f.map_int_cast, eval_monomial, map_monomial, f.map_pow, f.map_mul] }
end
end map
/-!
After having set up the basic theory of `eval₂`, `eval`, `comp`, and `map`,
we make `eval₂` irreducible.
Perhaps we can make the others irreducible too?
-/
attribute [irreducible] polynomial.eval₂
section hom_eval₂
-- TODO: Here we need commutativity in both `S` and `T`?
variables [comm_semiring S] [comm_semiring T]
variables (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) (p)
lemma hom_eval₂ (x : S) : g (p.eval₂ f x) = p.eval₂ (g.comp f) (g x) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on p; clear p,
{ simp only [forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, eval₂_C, ring_hom.coe_comp] },
{ intros p q hp hq, simp only [hp, hq, eval₂_add, g.map_add] },
{ intros n a ih, simpa only [eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_X_pow, g.map_mul, g.map_pow] }
end
end hom_eval₂
end semiring
section comm_semiring
section eval
variables [comm_semiring R] {p q : polynomial R} {x : R}
lemma eval₂_comp [comm_semiring S] (f : R →+* S) {x : S} :
eval₂ f x (p.comp q) = eval₂ f (eval₂ f x q) p :=
by rw [comp, p.as_sum_range]; simp [eval₂_finset_sum, eval₂_pow]
@[simp] lemma eval_mul : (p * q).eval x = p.eval x * q.eval x := eval₂_mul _ _
/-- `eval r`, regarded as a ring homomorphism from `polynomial R` to `R`. -/
def eval_ring_hom : R → polynomial R →+* R := eval₂_ring_hom (ring_hom.id _)
@[simp] lemma coe_eval_ring_hom (r : R) : ((eval_ring_hom r) : polynomial R → R) = eval r := rfl
@[simp] lemma eval_pow (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).eval x = p.eval x ^ n := eval₂_pow _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma eval_comp : (p.comp q).eval x = p.eval (q.eval x) :=
begin
apply polynomial.induction_on' p,
{ intros r s hr hs, simp [add_comp, hr, hs], },
{ intros n a, simp, }
end
/-- `comp p`, regarded as a ring homomorphism from `polynomial R` to itself. -/
def comp_ring_hom : polynomial R → polynomial R →+* polynomial R :=
eval₂_ring_hom C
lemma eval₂_hom [comm_semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : R) :
p.eval₂ f (f x) = f (p.eval x) :=
(ring_hom.comp_id f) ▸ (hom_eval₂ p (ring_hom.id R) f x).symm
lemma root_mul_left_of_is_root (p : polynomial R) {q : polynomial R} :
is_root q a → is_root (p * q) a :=
λ H, by rw [is_root, eval_mul, is_root.def.1 H, mul_zero]
lemma root_mul_right_of_is_root {p : polynomial R} (q : polynomial R) :
is_root p a → is_root (p * q) a :=
λ H, by rw [is_root, eval_mul, is_root.def.1 H, zero_mul]
/--
Polynomial evaluation commutes with finset.prod
-/
lemma eval_prod {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (p : ι → polynomial R) (x : R) :
eval x (∏ j in s, p j) = ∏ j in s, eval x (p j) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
{ simp only [finset.prod_empty, eval_one] },
{ intros j s hj hpj,
have h0 : ∏ i in insert j s, eval x (p i) = (eval x (p j)) * ∏ i in s, eval x (p i),
{ apply finset.prod_insert hj },
rw [h0, ← hpj, finset.prod_insert hj, eval_mul] },
end
end eval
section map
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
lemma map_multiset_prod (m : multiset (polynomial R)) : m.prod.map f = (m.map $ map f).prod :=
eq.symm $ multiset.prod_hom _ (map_ring_hom f).to_monoid_hom
lemma map_prod {ι : Type*} (g : ι → polynomial R) (s : finset ι) :
(∏ i in s, g i).map f = ∏ i in s, (g i).map f :=
(map_ring_hom f).map_prod _ _
lemma support_map_subset (p : polynomial R) : (map f p).support ⊆ p.support :=
begin
intros x,
simp only [mem_support_iff],
contrapose!,
rw coeff_map,
intro hx,
rw hx,
exact ring_hom.map_zero f,
end
end map
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] {p q r : polynomial R}
lemma C_neg : C (-a) = -C a := ring_hom.map_neg C a
lemma C_sub : C (a - b) = C a - C b := ring_hom.map_sub C a b
@[simp] lemma map_sub {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
(p - q).map f = p.map f - q.map f :=
(map_ring_hom f).map_sub p q
@[simp] lemma map_neg {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
(-p).map f = -(p.map f) :=
(map_ring_hom f).map_neg p
@[simp] lemma map_int_cast {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) (n : ℤ) :
map f ↑n = ↑n :=
(map_ring_hom f).map_int_cast n
@[simp] lemma eval_int_cast {n : ℤ} {x : R} : (n : polynomial R).eval x = n :=
by simp only [←C_eq_int_cast, eval_C]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_neg {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) {x : S} :
(-p).eval₂ f x = -p.eval₂ f x :=
by rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ←eval₂_add, add_left_neg, eval₂_zero]
@[simp] lemma eval₂_sub {S} [ring S] (f : R →+* S) {x : S} :
(p - q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x - q.eval₂ f x :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, eval₂_add, eval₂_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma eval_neg (p : polynomial R) (x : R) : (-p).eval x = -p.eval x :=
eval₂_neg _
@[simp] lemma eval_sub (p q : polynomial R) (x : R) : (p - q).eval x = p.eval x - q.eval x :=
eval₂_sub _
lemma root_X_sub_C : is_root (X - C a) b ↔ a = b :=
by rw [is_root.def, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma neg_comp : (-p).comp q = -p.comp q := eval₂_neg _
@[simp] lemma sub_comp : (p - q).comp r = p.comp r - q.comp r := eval₂_sub _
@[simp] lemma cast_int_comp (i : ℤ) : comp (i : polynomial R) p = i :=
by cases i; simp
end ring
end polynomial
|
69240ba62f65e3bfe6399d956c70875d0171686f | 54deab7025df5d2df4573383df7e1e5497b7a2c2 | /data/int/basic.lean | d448792fe109020d2b1f1104dd1318ed97b73083 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | HGldJ1966/mathlib | f8daac93a5b4ae805cfb0ecebac21a9ce9469009 | c5c5b504b918a6c5e91e372ee29ed754b0513e85 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,340,395,683 | 1,503,040,489,000 | 1,503,040,489,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,159 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
The integers, with addition, multiplication, and subtraction.
-/
import data.nat.sub
open nat
namespace int
instance : inhabited ℤ := ⟨0⟩
meta instance : has_to_format ℤ := ⟨λ z, int.rec_on z (λ k, ↑k) (λ k, "-("++↑k++"+1)")⟩
/- / -/
theorem of_nat_div (m n : nat) : of_nat (m / n) = (of_nat m) / (of_nat n) := rfl
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_div (m : nat) {b : ℤ} (H : b > 0) :
-[1+m] / b = -(m / b + 1) :=
match b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H with ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := rfl end
@[simp] protected theorem div_neg : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a / -b = -(a / b)
| (m : ℕ) 0 := show of_nat (m / 0) = -(m / 0 : ℕ), by rw nat.div_zero; refl
| (m : ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| 0 -[1+ n] := rfl
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := (neg_neg _).symm
| -[1+ m] 0 := rfl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := rfl
theorem div_of_neg_of_pos {a b : ℤ} (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : b > 0) : a / b = -((-a - 1) / b + 1) :=
match a, b, eq_neg_succ_of_lt_zero Ha, eq_succ_of_zero_lt Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ :=
by change (- -[1+ m] : ℤ) with (m+1 : ℤ); rw add_sub_cancel; refl
end
protected theorem div_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (Ha : a ≥ 0) (Hb : b ≥ 0) : a / b ≥ 0 :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le Ha, eq_coe_of_zero_le Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := coe_zero_le _
end
protected theorem div_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (Ha : a ≥ 0) (Hb : b ≤ 0) : a / b ≤ 0 :=
nonpos_of_neg_nonneg $ by rw [← int.div_neg]; exact int.div_nonneg Ha (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos Hb)
theorem div_neg' {a b : ℤ} (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : b > 0) : a / b < 0 :=
match a, b, eq_neg_succ_of_lt_zero Ha, eq_succ_of_zero_lt Hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := neg_succ_lt_zero _
end
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div : ∀ (b : ℤ), 0 / b = 0
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ n] := rfl
@[simp] protected theorem div_zero : ∀ (a : ℤ), a / 0 = 0
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ n] := rfl
@[simp] protected theorem div_one : ∀ (a : ℤ), a / 1 = a
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.div_one _)
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat (nat.div_one _)
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < b) : a / b = 0 :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le H1, eq_succ_of_zero_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt H1 H2), H2 with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H2 :=
congr_arg of_nat $ nat.div_eq_of_lt $ lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat H2
end
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt_abs {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < abs b) : a / b = 0 :=
match b, abs b, abs_eq_nat_abs b, H2 with
| (n : ℕ), ._, rfl, H2 := div_eq_zero_of_lt H1 H2
| -[1+ n], ._, rfl, H2 := neg_inj $ by rw [← int.div_neg]; exact div_eq_zero_of_lt H1 H2
end
protected theorem add_mul_div_right (a b : ℤ) {c : ℤ} (H : c ≠ 0) :
(a + b * c) / c = a / c + b :=
have ∀ {k n : ℕ} {a : ℤ}, (a + n * k.succ) / k.succ = a / k.succ + n, from
λ k n a, match a with
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ k.succ_pos
| -[1+ m] := show ((n * k.succ:ℕ) - m.succ : ℤ) / k.succ =
n - (m / k.succ + 1 : ℕ), begin
cases lt_or_ge m (n*k.succ) with h h,
{ rw [← int.coe_nat_sub h,
← int.coe_nat_sub ((nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ k.succ_pos).2 h)],
apply congr_arg of_nat,
rw [mul_comm, nat.mul_sub_div], rwa mul_comm },
{ change (↑(n * nat.succ k) - (m + 1) : ℤ) / ↑(nat.succ k) =
↑n - ((m / nat.succ k : ℕ) + 1),
rw [← sub_sub, ← sub_sub, ← neg_sub (m:ℤ), ← neg_sub _ (n:ℤ),
← int.coe_nat_sub h,
← int.coe_nat_sub ((nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ k.succ_pos).2 h),
← neg_succ_of_nat_coe', ← neg_succ_of_nat_coe'],
{ apply congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat,
rw [mul_comm, nat.sub_mul_div], rwa mul_comm } }
end
end,
have ∀ {a b c : ℤ}, c > 0 → (a + b * c) / c = a / c + b, from
λ a b c H, match c, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H, b with
| ._, ⟨k, rfl⟩, (n : ℕ) := this
| ._, ⟨k, rfl⟩, -[1+ n] :=
show (a - n.succ * k.succ) / k.succ = (a / k.succ) - n.succ, from
eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by rw [← this, sub_add_cancel]
end,
match lt_trichotomy c 0 with
| or.inl hlt := neg_inj $ by rw [← int.div_neg, neg_add, ← int.div_neg, ← neg_mul_neg];
apply this (neg_pos_of_neg hlt)
| or.inr (or.inl heq) := absurd heq H
| or.inr (or.inr hgt) := this hgt
end
protected theorem add_mul_div_left (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (H : b ≠ 0) :
(a + b * c) / b = a / b + c :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ H]
@[simp] protected theorem mul_div_cancel (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a * b / b = a :=
by have := int.add_mul_div_right 0 a H;
rwa [zero_add, int.zero_div, zero_add] at this
@[simp] protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left {a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (H : a ≠ 0) : a * b / a = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.mul_div_cancel _ H]
@[simp] protected theorem div_self {a : ℤ} (H : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 :=
by have := int.mul_div_cancel 1 H; rwa one_mul at this
/- mod -/
theorem of_nat_mod (m n : nat) : (m % n : ℤ) = of_nat (m % n) := rfl
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_mod (m : ℕ) {b : ℤ} (bpos : b > 0) :
-[1+m] % b = b - 1 - m % b :=
by rw [sub_sub, add_comm]; exact
match b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt bpos with ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := rfl end
@[simp] theorem mod_neg : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a % -b = a % b
| (m : ℕ) n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λ i, ↑(m % i)) (nat_abs_neg _)
| -[1+ m] n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λ i, sub_nat_nat i (nat.succ (m % i))) (nat_abs_neg _)
@[simp] theorem mod_abs (a b : ℤ) : a % (abs b) = a % b :=
abs_by_cases (λ i, a % i = a % b) rfl (mod_neg _ _)
@[simp] theorem zero_mod (b : ℤ) : 0 % b = 0 :=
congr_arg of_nat $ nat.zero_mod _
@[simp] theorem mod_zero : ∀ (a : ℤ), a % 0 = a
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_zero _
| -[1+ m] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $ nat.mod_zero _
@[simp] theorem mod_one : ∀ (a : ℤ), a % 1 = 0
| (m : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_one _
| -[1+ m] := show (1 - (m % 1).succ : ℤ) = 0, by rw nat.mod_one; refl
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : ℤ} (H1 : 0 ≤ a) (H2 : a < b) : a % b = a :=
match a, b, eq_coe_of_zero_le H1, eq_coe_of_zero_le (le_trans H1 (le_of_lt H2)), H2 with
| ._, ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H2 :=
congr_arg of_nat $ nat.mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_coe_nat_lt_coe_nat H2)
end
theorem mod_nonneg : ∀ (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ}, b ≠ 0 → a % b ≥ 0
| (m : ℕ) n H := coe_zero_le _
| -[1+ m] n H :=
sub_nonneg_of_le $ coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le $ nat.mod_lt _ (nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero H)
theorem mod_lt_of_pos (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b > 0) : a % b < b :=
match a, b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H with
| (m : ℕ), ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt (nat.mod_lt _ (nat.succ_pos _))
| -[1+ m], ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := sub_lt_self _ (coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt $ nat.succ_pos _)
end
theorem mod_lt (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a % b < abs b :=
by rw [← mod_abs]; exact mod_lt_of_pos _ (abs_pos_of_ne_zero H)
theorem mod_add_div_aux (m n : ℕ) : (n - (m % n + 1) - (n * (m / n) + n) : ℤ) = -[1+ m] :=
begin
rw [← sub_sub, neg_succ_of_nat_coe, sub_sub (n:ℤ)],
apply eq_neg_of_eq_neg,
rw [neg_sub, sub_sub_self, add_right_comm],
exact @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λi, (i + 1 : ℤ)) (nat.mod_add_div _ _).symm
end
theorem mod_add_div : ∀ (a b : ℤ), a % b + b * (a / b) = a
| (m : ℕ) 0 := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| (m : ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| 0 -[1+ n] := rfl
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := show (_ + -(n+1) * -((m + 1) / (n + 1) : ℕ) : ℤ) = _,
by rw [neg_mul_neg]; exact congr_arg of_nat (nat.mod_add_div _ _)
| -[1+ m] 0 := by rw [mod_zero, int.div_zero]; refl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := mod_add_div_aux m n.succ
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := mod_add_div_aux m n.succ
theorem mod_def (a b : ℤ) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq (mod_add_div _ _)
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self {a b c : ℤ} : (a + b * c) % c = a % c :=
if cz : c = 0 then by rw [cz, mul_zero, add_zero] else
by rw [mod_def, mod_def, int.add_mul_div_right _ _ cz,
mul_add, mul_comm, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self_left (a b c : ℤ) : (a + b * c) % b = a % b :=
by rw [mul_comm, add_mul_mod_self]
@[simp] theorem add_mod_self {a b : ℤ} : (a + b) % b = a % b :=
by have := add_mul_mod_self_left a b 1; rwa mul_one at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_self_left {a b : ℤ} : (a + b) % a = b % a :=
by rw [add_comm, add_mod_self]
@[simp] theorem mod_add_mod (m n k : ℤ) : (m % n + k) % n = (m + k) % n :=
by have := (add_mul_mod_self_left (m % n + k) n (m / n)).symm;
rwa [add_right_comm, mod_add_div] at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_mod (m n k : ℤ) : (m + n % k) % k = (m + n) % k :=
by rw [add_comm, mod_add_mod, add_comm]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_right {m n k : ℤ} (i : ℤ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(m + i) % n = (k + i) % n :=
by rw [← mod_add_mod, ← mod_add_mod k, H]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_left {m n k : ℤ} (i : ℤ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _ H, add_comm]
theorem mod_eq_mod_of_add_mod_eq_add_mod_right {m n k i : ℤ}
(H : (m + i) % n = (k + i) % n) :
m % n = k % n :=
by have := add_mod_eq_add_mod_right (-i) H;
rwa [add_neg_cancel_right, add_neg_cancel_right] at this
theorem mod_eq_mod_of_add_mod_eq_add_mod_left {m n k i : ℤ} :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n → m % n = k % n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_comm i]; apply mod_eq_mod_of_add_mod_eq_add_mod_right
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_left (a b : ℤ) : (a * b) % b = 0 :=
by rw [← zero_add (a * b), add_mul_mod_self, zero_mod]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_right (a b : ℤ) : (a * b) % a = 0 :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_mod_left]
@[simp] theorem mod_self {a : ℤ} : a % a = 0 :=
by have := mul_mod_left 1 a; rwa one_mul at this
/- properties of / and % -/
@[simp] theorem mul_div_mul_of_pos {a : ℤ} (b c : ℤ) (H : a > 0) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c :=
suffices ∀ (m k : ℕ) (b : ℤ), (m.succ * b / (m.succ * k) : ℤ) = b / k, from
match a, eq_succ_of_zero_lt H, c, eq_coe_or_neg c with
| ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ._, ⟨k, or.inl rfl⟩ := this _ _ _
| ._, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ._, ⟨k, or.inr rfl⟩ :=
by rw [← neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, int.div_neg, int.div_neg];
apply congr_arg has_neg.neg; apply this
end,
λ m k b, match b, k with
| (n : ℕ), k := congr_arg of_nat (nat.mul_div_mul _ _ m.succ_pos)
| -[1+ n], 0 := by rw [int.coe_nat_zero, mul_zero, int.div_zero, int.div_zero]
| -[1+ n], k+1 := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
show (m.succ * n + m) / (m.succ * k.succ) = n / k.succ, begin
apply nat.div_eq_of_lt_le,
{ refine le_trans _ (nat.le_add_right _ _),
rw [← nat.mul_div_mul _ _ m.succ_pos],
apply nat.div_mul_le_self },
{ change m.succ * n.succ ≤ _,
rw [mul_left_comm],
apply nat.mul_le_mul_left,
apply (nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ k.succ_pos).1,
apply nat.lt_succ_self }
end
end
@[simp] theorem mul_div_mul_of_pos_left (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (H : b > 0) :
a * b / (c * b) = a / c :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_comm c, mul_div_mul_of_pos _ _ H]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_mul_of_pos {a : ℤ} (b c : ℤ) (H : a > 0) : a * b % (a * c) = a * (b % c) :=
by rw [mod_def, mod_def, mul_div_mul_of_pos _ _ H, mul_sub_left_distrib, mul_assoc]
theorem lt_div_add_one_mul_self (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b > 0) : a < (a / b + 1) * b :=
by rw [add_mul, one_mul, mul_comm]; apply lt_add_of_sub_left_lt;
rw [← mod_def]; apply mod_lt_of_pos _ H
theorem abs_div_le_abs : ∀ (a b : ℤ), abs (a / b) ≤ abs a :=
suffices ∀ (a : ℤ) (n : ℕ), abs (a / n) ≤ abs a, from
λ a b, match b, eq_coe_or_neg b with
| ._, ⟨n, or.inl rfl⟩ := this _ _
| ._, ⟨n, or.inr rfl⟩ := by rw [int.div_neg, abs_neg]; apply this
end,
λ a n, by rw [abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs]; exact
coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le (match a, n with
| (m : ℕ), n := nat.div_le_self _ _
| -[1+ m], 0 := nat.zero_le _
| -[1+ m], n+1 := nat.succ_le_succ (nat.div_le_self _ _)
end)
theorem div_le_self {a : ℤ} (b : ℤ) (Ha : a ≥ 0) : a / b ≤ a :=
by have := le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_div_le_abs a b);
rwa [abs_of_nonneg Ha] at this
theorem mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : a % b = 0) : b * (a / b) = a :=
by have := mod_add_div a b; rwa [H, zero_add] at this
theorem div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : a % b = 0) : a / b * b = a :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero H]
/- dvd -/
theorem coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat_of_dvd {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∣ n) : (↑m : ℤ) ∣ ↑n :=
dvd.elim h $ λk e, dvd.intro k $ by rw [e, int.coe_nat_mul]
theorem dvd_of_coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} (h : (↑m : ℤ) ∣ ↑n) : m ∣ n :=
dvd.elim h $ λa ae,
m.eq_zero_or_pos.elim
(λm0, by rw[m0, int.coe_nat_zero, zero_mul] at ae;
rw [int.coe_nat_inj ae]; apply dvd_zero)
(λm0l, let ⟨k, ke⟩ := int.eq_coe_of_zero_le $ nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left
(by rw [← ae]; apply int.coe_zero_le : 0 ≤ (m:ℤ) * a)
(int.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le m0l) in
by rw [ke, ← int.coe_nat_mul] at ae; exact dvd.intro _ (int.coe_nat_inj ae).symm)
theorem coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat_iff (m n : ℕ) : (↑m : ℤ) ∣ ↑n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨dvd_of_coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat, coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat_of_dvd⟩
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : ℤ} (H1 : a ≥ 0) (H2 : b ≥ 0) : a ∣ b → b ∣ a → a = b :=
begin
rw [← abs_of_nonneg H1, ← abs_of_nonneg H2, abs_eq_nat_abs, abs_eq_nat_abs],
rw [coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat_iff, coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat_iff, int.coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff],
apply nat.dvd_antisymm
end
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (H : b % a = 0) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b / a, (mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero H).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ℤ}, a ∣ b → b % a = 0
| a ._ ⟨c, rfl⟩ := mul_mod_right _ _
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero (a b : ℤ) : a ∣ b ↔ b % a = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
theorem coe_nat_dvd_left {a b : ℤ} : (a.nat_abs : ℤ) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
(nat_abs_eq a).elim (λ e, by rw ← e) (λ e, by rw [← neg_dvd_iff_dvd, ← e])
theorem coe_nat_dvd_right {a b : ℤ} : a ∣ b.nat_abs ↔ a ∣ b :=
(nat_abs_eq b).elim (λ e, by rw ← e) (λ e, by rw [← dvd_neg_iff_dvd, ← e])
instance decidable_dvd : @decidable_rel ℤ (∣) :=
assume a n, decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by apply_instance) (dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).symm
protected theorem div_mul_cancel {a b : ℤ} (H : b ∣ a) : a / b * b = a :=
div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero (mod_eq_zero_of_dvd H)
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {a b : ℤ} (H : a ∣ b) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.div_mul_cancel H]
protected theorem mul_div_assoc (a : ℤ) : ∀ {b c : ℤ}, c ∣ b → (a * b) / c = a * (b / c)
| ._ c ⟨d, rfl⟩ := if cz : c = 0 then by simp [cz] else
by rw [mul_left_comm, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ cz, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ cz]
theorem div_dvd_div : ∀ {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : a ∣ b) (H2 : b ∣ c), b / a ∣ c / a
| a ._ ._ ⟨b, rfl⟩ ⟨c, rfl⟩ := if az : a = 0 then by simp [az] else
by rw [int.mul_div_cancel_left _ az, mul_assoc, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ az];
apply dvd_mul_right
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c :=
by rw [← H2, int.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ≠ 0) (H2 : a = b * c) :
a / b = c :=
by rw [H2, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
⟨int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = c * b :=
by rw mul_comm; exact int.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_left {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H1 H2]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ≠ 0) (H2 : a = c * b) :
a / b = c :=
int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H1 (by rw [mul_comm, H2])
theorem neg_div_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : ℤ} (H : b ∣ a), -a / b = -(a / b)
| ._ b ⟨c, rfl⟩ := if bz : b = 0 then by simp [bz] else
by rw [neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ bz, int.mul_div_cancel_left _ bz]
theorem div_sign : ∀ a b, a / sign b = a * sign b
| a (n+1:ℕ) := by simp [sign]
| a 0 := by simp [sign]
| a -[1+ n] := by simp [sign]
@[simp] theorem sign_mul : ∀ a b, sign (a * b) = sign a * sign b
| a 0 := by simp
| 0 b := by simp
| (m+1:ℕ) (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| (m+1:ℕ) -[1+ n] := rfl
| -[1+ m] (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := rfl
protected theorem sign_eq_div_abs (a : ℤ) : sign a = a / (abs a) :=
if az : a = 0 then by simp [az] else
(int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (mt eq_zero_of_abs_eq_zero az)
(sign_mul_abs _).symm).symm
theorem le_of_dvd {a b : ℤ} (bpos : b > 0) (H : a ∣ b) : a ≤ b :=
match a, b, eq_succ_of_zero_lt bpos, H with
| (m : ℕ), ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H := coe_nat_le_coe_nat_of_le $
nat.le_of_dvd n.succ_pos $ dvd_of_coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat H
| -[1+ m], ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, _ :=
le_trans (le_of_lt $ neg_succ_lt_zero _) (coe_zero_le _)
end
theorem eq_one_of_dvd_one {a : ℤ} (H : a ≥ 0) (H' : a ∣ 1) : a = 1 :=
match a, eq_coe_of_zero_le H, H' with
| ._, ⟨n, rfl⟩, H' := congr_arg coe $
nat.eq_one_of_dvd_one $ dvd_of_coe_nat_dvd_coe_nat H'
end
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right {a b : ℤ} (H : a ≥ 0) (H' : a * b = 1) : a = 1 :=
eq_one_of_dvd_one H ⟨b, H'.symm⟩
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_left {a b : ℤ} (H : b ≥ 0) (H' : a * b = 1) : b = 1 :=
eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right H (by rw [mul_comm, H'])
/- / and ordering -/
protected theorem div_mul_le (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (H : b ≠ 0) : a / b * b ≤ a :=
le_of_sub_nonneg $ by rw [mul_comm, ← mod_def]; apply mod_nonneg _ H
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : c > 0) (H' : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right (le_trans (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H)) H') H
protected theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : ℤ} (H : c > 0) (H3 : a < b / c) : a * c < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.div_le_of_le_mul H) (not_le_of_gt H3)
protected theorem mul_le_of_le_div {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : c > 0) (H2 : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H2 (le_of_lt H1)) (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H1))
protected theorem le_div_of_mul_le {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : c > 0) (H2 : a * c ≤ b) : a ≤ b / c :=
le_of_lt_add_one $ lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right
(lt_of_le_of_lt H2 (lt_div_add_one_mul_self _ H1)) (le_of_lt H1)
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {a b c : ℤ} (H : c > 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨int.mul_le_of_le_div H, int.le_div_of_mul_le H⟩
protected theorem div_le_div {a b c : ℤ} (H : c > 0) (H' : a ≤ b) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
int.le_div_of_mul_le H (le_trans (int.div_mul_le _ (ne_of_gt H)) H')
protected theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : c > 0) (H' : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.mul_le_of_le_div H) (not_le_of_gt H')
protected theorem lt_mul_of_div_lt {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : c > 0) (H2 : a / c < b) : a < b * c :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.le_div_of_mul_le H1) (not_le_of_gt H2)
protected theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul {a b c : ℤ} (H : c > 0) : a / c < b ↔ a < b * c :=
⟨int.lt_mul_of_div_lt H, int.div_lt_of_lt_mul H⟩
protected theorem le_mul_of_div_le {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ≥ 0) (H2 : b ∣ a) (H3 : a / b ≤ c) :
a ≤ c * b :=
by rw [← int.div_mul_cancel H2]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right H3 H1
protected theorem lt_div_of_mul_lt {a b c : ℤ} (H1 : b ≥ 0) (H2 : b ∣ c) (H3 : a * b < c) :
a < c / b :=
lt_of_not_ge $ mt (int.le_mul_of_div_le H1 H2) (not_le_of_gt H3)
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt {a b : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (H : c > 0) (H' : c ∣ b) :
a < b / c ↔ a * c < b :=
⟨int.mul_lt_of_lt_div H, int.lt_div_of_mul_lt (le_of_lt H) H'⟩
theorem div_pos_of_pos_of_dvd {a b : ℤ} (H1 : a > 0) (H2 : b ≥ 0) (H3 : b ∣ a) : a / b > 0 :=
int.lt_div_of_mul_lt H2 H3 (by rwa zero_mul)
theorem div_eq_div_of_mul_eq_mul {a b c d : ℤ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : d ∣ c) (H3 : b ≠ 0)
(H4 : d ≠ 0) (H5 : a * d = b * c) :
a / b = c / d :=
int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H3 $
by rw [← int.mul_div_assoc _ H2]; exact
(int.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left H4 H5.symm).symm
end int
namespace int
theorem of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (h : m < succ n) : of_nat m + -[1+n] = -[1+ n - m] :=
begin
change sub_nat_nat _ _ = _,
have h' : succ n - m = succ (n - m),
apply succ_sub,
apply le_of_lt_succ h,
simp [*, sub_nat_nat]
end
theorem of_nat_add_neg_succ_of_nat_of_ge {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≥ succ n) : of_nat m + -[1+n] = of_nat (m - succ n) :=
begin
change sub_nat_nat _ _ = _,
have h' : succ n - m = 0,
apply sub_eq_zero_of_le h,
simp [*, sub_nat_nat]
end
@[simp] theorem neg_add_neg (m n : ℕ) : -[1+m] + -[1+n] = -[1+nat.succ(m+n)] := rfl
/- nat abs -/
attribute [simp] nat_abs
theorem nat_abs_add_le (a b : ℤ) : nat_abs (a + b) ≤ nat_abs a + nat_abs b :=
begin
have, {
refine (λ a b, sub_nat_nat_elim a (succ b)
(λ m n i, n = succ b → nat_abs i ≤ succ (m + b)) _ _ rfl);
intros i n e,
{ subst e, rw [add_comm _ i, add_assoc],
exact nat.le_add_right i (succ (succ b + b)) },
{ apply succ_le_succ,
rw [← succ_inj e, ← add_assoc, add_comm],
apply nat.le_add_right } },
cases a; cases b with b b; simp [nat_abs, succ_add];
try {refl}; [skip, rw add_comm a b]; apply this
end
theorem nat_abs_neg_of_nat (n : nat) : nat_abs (neg_of_nat n) = n :=
by cases n; refl
theorem nat_abs_mul (a b : ℤ) : nat_abs (a * b) = (nat_abs a) * (nat_abs b) :=
by cases a; cases b; simp [(*), int.mul, nat_abs_neg_of_nat]
theorem neg_succ_of_nat_eq' (m : ℕ) : -[1+ m] = -m - 1 :=
by simp [neg_succ_of_nat_eq]
def succ (a : ℤ) := a + 1
def pred (a : ℤ) := a - 1
theorem nat_succ_eq_int_succ (n : ℕ) : (nat.succ n : ℤ) = int.succ n := rfl
theorem pred_succ (a : ℤ) : pred (succ a) = a := add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem succ_pred (a : ℤ) : succ (pred a) = a := sub_add_cancel _ _
theorem neg_succ (a : ℤ) : -succ a = pred (-a) := neg_add _ _
theorem succ_neg_succ (a : ℤ) : succ (-succ a) = -a :=
by rw [neg_succ, succ_pred]
theorem neg_pred (a : ℤ) : -pred a = succ (-a) :=
by rw [eq_neg_of_eq_neg (neg_succ (-a)).symm, neg_neg]
theorem pred_neg_pred (a : ℤ) : pred (-pred a) = -a :=
by rw [neg_pred, pred_succ]
theorem pred_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : pred (nat.succ n) = n := pred_succ n
theorem neg_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : -(nat.succ n : ℤ) = pred (-n) := neg_succ n
theorem succ_neg_nat_succ (n : ℕ) : succ (-nat.succ n) = -n := succ_neg_succ n
/- bitwise ops -/
@[simp] lemma bodd_zero : bodd 0 = ff := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_one : bodd 1 = tt := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_two : bodd 2 = ff := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_sub_nat_nat (m n : ℕ) : bodd (sub_nat_nat m n) = bxor m.bodd n.bodd :=
by apply sub_nat_nat_elim m n (λ m n i, bodd i = bxor m.bodd n.bodd);
intros i m; simp [bodd]; cases i.bodd; cases m.bodd; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_neg_of_nat (n : ℕ) : bodd (neg_of_nat n) = n.bodd :=
by cases n; simp; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_neg (n : ℤ) : bodd (-n) = bodd n :=
by cases n; unfold has_neg.neg; simp [int.coe_nat_eq, int.neg, bodd]
@[simp] lemma bodd_add (m n : ℤ) : bodd (m + n) = bxor (bodd m) (bodd n) :=
by cases m with m m; cases n with n n; unfold has_add.add; simp [int.add, bodd];
cases m.bodd; cases n.bodd; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_mul (m n : ℤ) : bodd (m * n) = bodd m && bodd n :=
by cases m with m m; cases n with n n; unfold has_mul.mul; simp [int.mul, bodd];
cases m.bodd; cases n.bodd; refl
theorem bodd_add_div2 : ∀ n, cond (bodd n) 1 0 + 2 * div2 n = n
| (n : ℕ) :=
by rw [show (cond (bodd n) 1 0 : ℤ) = (cond (bodd n) 1 0 : ℕ),
by cases bodd n; refl]; exact congr_arg of_nat n.bodd_add_div2
| -[1+ n] := begin
refine eq.trans _ (congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat n.bodd_add_div2),
dsimp [bodd], cases nat.bodd n; dsimp [cond, bnot, div2, int.mul],
{ change -[1+ 2 * nat.div2 n] = _, rw zero_add },
{ rw [zero_add, add_comm], refl }
end
theorem div2_val : ∀ n, div2 n = n / 2
| (n : ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat n.div2_val
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat n.div2_val
lemma bit0_val (n : ℤ) : bit0 n = 2 * n := (two_mul _).symm
lemma bit1_val (n : ℤ) : bit1 n = 2 * n + 1 := congr_arg (+(1:ℤ)) (bit0_val _)
lemma bit_val (b n) : bit b n = 2 * n + cond b 1 0 :=
by { cases b, apply (bit0_val n).trans (add_zero _).symm, apply bit1_val }
lemma bit_decomp (n : ℤ) : bit (bodd n) (div2 n) = n :=
(bit_val _ _).trans $ (add_comm _ _).trans $ bodd_add_div2 _
def {u} bit_cases_on {C : ℤ → Sort u} (n) (h : ∀ b n, C (bit b n)) : C n :=
by rw [← bit_decomp n]; apply h
@[simp] lemma bit_zero : bit ff 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma bit_coe_nat (b) (n : ℕ) : bit b n = nat.bit b n :=
by rw [bit_val, nat.bit_val]; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma bit_neg_succ (b) (n : ℕ) : bit b -[1+ n] = -[1+ nat.bit (bnot b) n] :=
by rw [bit_val, nat.bit_val]; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit (b n) : bodd (bit b n) = b :=
by rw bit_val; simp; cases b; cases bodd n; refl
@[simp] lemma div2_bit (b n) : div2 (bit b n) = n :=
begin
rw [bit_val, div2_val, add_comm, int.add_mul_div_left, (_ : (_/2:ℤ) = 0), zero_add],
cases b, all_goals {exact dec_trivial}
end
@[simp] lemma test_bit_zero (b) : ∀ n, test_bit (bit b n) 0 = b
| (n : ℕ) := by rw [bit_coe_nat]; apply nat.test_bit_zero
| -[1+ n] := by rw [bit_neg_succ]; dsimp [test_bit]; rw [nat.test_bit_zero];
clear test_bit_zero; cases b; refl
@[simp] lemma test_bit_succ (m b) : ∀ n, test_bit (bit b n) (nat.succ m) = test_bit n m
| (n : ℕ) := by rw [bit_coe_nat]; apply nat.test_bit_succ
| -[1+ n] := by rw [bit_neg_succ]; dsimp [test_bit]; rw [nat.test_bit_succ]
private meta def bitwise_tac : tactic unit := `[
apply funext, intro m,
apply funext, intro n,
cases m with m m; cases n with n n; try {refl},
all_goals {
apply congr_arg of_nat <|> apply congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat,
try {dsimp [nat.land, nat.ldiff, nat.lor]},
try {rw [
show nat.bitwise (λ a b, a && bnot b) n m =
nat.bitwise (λ a b, b && bnot a) m n, from
congr_fun (congr_fun (@nat.bitwise_swap (λ a b, b && bnot a) rfl) n) m]},
apply congr_arg (λ f, nat.bitwise f m n),
apply funext, intro a,
apply funext, intro b,
cases a; cases b; refl
},
all_goals {unfold nat.land nat.ldiff nat.lor}
]
theorem bitwise_or : bitwise bor = lor := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_and : bitwise band = land := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_diff : bitwise (λ a b, a && bnot b) = ldiff := by bitwise_tac
theorem bitwise_xor : bitwise bxor = lxor := by bitwise_tac
@[simp] lemma bitwise_bit (f : bool → bool → bool) (a m b n) :
bitwise f (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (f a b) (bitwise f m n) :=
begin
cases m with m m; cases n with n n;
repeat { rw [← int.coe_nat_eq] <|> rw bit_coe_nat <|> rw bit_neg_succ };
unfold bitwise nat_bitwise bnot;
[ ginduction f ff ff with h,
ginduction f ff tt with h,
ginduction f tt ff with h,
ginduction f tt tt with h ],
all_goals {
unfold cond, rw nat.bitwise_bit,
repeat { rw bit_coe_nat <|> rw bit_neg_succ <|> rw bnot_bnot } },
all_goals { unfold bnot {fail_if_unchanged := ff}; rw h; refl }
end
@[simp] lemma lor_bit (a m b n) : lor (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a || b) (lor m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_or, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma land_bit (a m b n) : land (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && b) (land m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_and, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma ldiff_bit (a m b n) : ldiff (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (a && bnot b) (ldiff m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_diff, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma lxor_bit (a m b n) : lxor (bit a m) (bit b n) = bit (bxor a b) (lxor m n) :=
by rw [← bitwise_xor, bitwise_bit]
@[simp] lemma lnot_bit (b) : ∀ n, lnot (bit b n) = bit (bnot b) (lnot n)
| (n : ℕ) := by simp [lnot]
| -[1+ n] := by simp [lnot]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_bitwise (f : bool → bool → bool) (m n k) :
test_bit (bitwise f m n) k = f (test_bit m k) (test_bit n k) :=
begin
revert m n; induction k with k IH; intros m n;
apply bit_cases_on m; intros a m';
apply bit_cases_on n; intros b n';
rw bitwise_bit,
{ simp [test_bit_zero] },
{ simp [test_bit_succ, IH] }
end
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lor (m n k) : test_bit (lor m n) k = test_bit m k || test_bit n k :=
by rw [← bitwise_or, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_land (m n k) : test_bit (land m n) k = test_bit m k && test_bit n k :=
by rw [← bitwise_and, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_ldiff (m n k) : test_bit (ldiff m n) k = test_bit m k && bnot (test_bit n k) :=
by rw [← bitwise_diff, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lxor (m n k) : test_bit (lxor m n) k = bxor (test_bit m k) (test_bit n k) :=
by rw [← bitwise_xor, test_bit_bitwise]
@[simp] lemma test_bit_lnot : ∀ n k, test_bit (lnot n) k = bnot (test_bit n k)
| (n : ℕ) k := by simp [lnot, test_bit]
| -[1+ n] k := by simp [lnot, test_bit]
lemma shiftl_add : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ), shiftl m (n + k) = shiftl (shiftl m n) k
| (m : ℕ) n (k:ℕ) := congr_arg of_nat (nat.shiftl_add _ _ _)
| -[1+ m] n (k:ℕ) := congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat (nat.shiftl'_add _ _ _ _)
| (m : ℕ) n -[1+k] := sub_nat_nat_elim n k.succ
(λ n k i, shiftl ↑m i = nat.shiftr (nat.shiftl m n) k)
(λ i n, congr_arg coe $
by rw [← nat.shiftl_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]; apply nat.le_add_right)
(λ i n, congr_arg coe $
by rw [add_assoc, nat.shiftr_add, ← nat.shiftl_sub, nat.sub_self]; refl)
| -[1+ m] n -[1+k] := sub_nat_nat_elim n k.succ
(λ n k i, shiftl -[1+ m] i = -[1+ nat.shiftr (nat.shiftl' tt m n) k])
(λ i n, congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
by rw [← nat.shiftl'_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]; apply nat.le_add_right)
(λ i n, congr_arg neg_succ_of_nat $
by rw [add_assoc, nat.shiftr_add, ← nat.shiftl'_sub, nat.sub_self]; refl)
lemma shiftl_sub (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ) : shiftl m (n - k) = shiftr (shiftl m n) k :=
shiftl_add _ _ _
@[simp] lemma shiftl_neg (m n : ℤ) : shiftl m (-n) = shiftr m n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftr_neg (m n : ℤ) : shiftr m (-n) = shiftl m n := by rw [← shiftl_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma shiftl_coe_nat (m n : ℕ) : shiftl m n = nat.shiftl m n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftr_coe_nat (m n : ℕ) : shiftr m n = nat.shiftr m n := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma shiftl_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : shiftl -[1+ m] n = -[1+ nat.shiftl' tt m n] := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftr_neg_succ (m n : ℕ) : shiftr -[1+ m] n = -[1+ nat.shiftr m n] := by cases n; refl
lemma shiftr_add : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n k : ℕ), shiftr m (n + k) = shiftr (shiftr m n) k
| (m : ℕ) n k := by rw [shiftr_coe_nat, shiftr_coe_nat,
← int.coe_nat_add, shiftr_coe_nat, nat.shiftr_add]
| -[1+ m] n k := by rw [shiftr_neg_succ, shiftr_neg_succ,
← int.coe_nat_add, shiftr_neg_succ, nat.shiftr_add]
lemma shiftl_eq_mul_pow : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ), shiftl m n = m * 2 ^ n
| (m : ℕ) n := congr_arg coe (nat.shiftl_eq_mul_pow _ _)
| -[1+ m] n := @congr_arg ℕ ℤ _ _ (λi, -i) (nat.shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow _ _)
lemma shiftr_eq_div_pow : ∀ (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ), shiftr m n = m / 2 ^ n
| (m : ℕ) n := by rw shiftr_coe_nat; exact congr_arg coe (nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow _ _)
| -[1+ m] n := begin
rw [shiftr_neg_succ, neg_succ_of_nat_div, nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow], refl,
exact coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt (nat.pos_pow_of_pos _ dec_trivial)
end
lemma one_shiftl (n : ℕ) : shiftl 1 n = (2 ^ n : ℕ) :=
congr_arg coe (nat.one_shiftl _)
@[simp] lemma zero_shiftl : ∀ n : ℤ, shiftl 0 n = 0
| (n : ℕ) := congr_arg coe (nat.zero_shiftl _)
| -[1+ n] := congr_arg coe (nat.zero_shiftr _)
@[simp] lemma zero_shiftr (n) : shiftr 0 n = 0 := zero_shiftl _
end int
|
aa97be81f202c538ef63b840e9d112a9286458c4 | f5373ccdc976e6390397d9f4220a74c76f706f4a | /src/examples/tactic_calls_process.lean | 6180e824f0495f8bf638007f81f4695d35aa7e37 | [] | no_license | jasonrute/lean_gym_prototype | fcd91fdc454f9e351bbe258c765f50276407547e | ab29624d14e4e069e15afe0b1d90248b5b394b86 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,628,526,780 | 1,590,539,315,000 | 1,590,539,315,000 | 264,938,525 | 3 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,152 | lean | import lean_gym.server
-- set up server
meta def json_config : json_server lean_server_request lean_server_response := {
read_write := io_streams.stdin_stdout_streams,
get_json := json_server.get_custom_json, -- use custom format since faster
put_json := json_server.put_standard_json, -- use standard format
}
meta def my_tactic : tactic unit := do
child ← tactic.unsafe_run_io $ io.proc.spawn {
cmd := "python3",
args := ["lean_gym/gym/example_app.py", "--app"],
stdout := io.process.stdio.piped,
stdin := io.process.stdio.piped,
},
let json_config : json_server lean_server_request lean_server_response := {
read_write := io_streams.child_process_streams child,
get_json := json_server.get_custom_json, -- use custom format since faster
put_json := json_server.put_standard_json, -- use standard format
},
out <- lean_gym.run_server_from_tactic json_config,
match out with
| except.error e := tactic.trace "There was an error"
| except.ok (some s) := tactic.trace s
| except.ok none := return ()
end,
return ()
example : (∀ p q : Prop, q → p → q) :=
begin
--my_tactic,
intro, intro, intro, intro, apply a
end |
02adc487d03fd721274159870f4644bd6dea3e53 | 453dcd7c0d1ef170b0843a81d7d8caedc9741dce | /analysis/nnreal.lean | 7be72a67c43f198d0b69ffe6c062c9f77525b10f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | amswerdlow/mathlib | 9af77a1f08486d8fa059448ae2d97795bd12ec0c | 27f96e30b9c9bf518341705c99d641c38638dfd0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,200,953,598 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 144,564,700 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,534,156,197,000 | 1,534,156,197,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,517 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
Nonnegative real numbers.
-/
import analysis.real analysis.topology.infinite_sum
noncomputable theory
open lattice filter
variables {α : Type*}
def nnreal := {r : ℝ // 0 ≤ r}
local notation ` ℝ≥0 ` := nnreal
namespace nnreal
instance : has_coe ℝ≥0 ℝ := ⟨subtype.val⟩
protected lemma eq {n m : ℝ≥0} : (n : ℝ) = (m : ℝ) → n = m := subtype.eq
protected lemma eq_iff {n m : ℝ≥0} : (n : ℝ) = (m : ℝ) ↔ n = m :=
iff.intro nnreal.eq (congr_arg coe)
protected def of_real (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 := ⟨max r 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
instance : has_zero ℝ≥0 := ⟨⟨0, le_refl 0⟩⟩
instance : has_one ℝ≥0 := ⟨⟨1, zero_le_one⟩⟩
instance : has_add ℝ≥0 := ⟨λa b, ⟨a + b, add_nonneg a.2 b.2⟩⟩
instance : has_sub ℝ≥0 := ⟨λa b, nnreal.of_real (a - b)⟩
instance : has_mul ℝ≥0 := ⟨λa b, ⟨a * b, mul_nonneg a.2 b.2⟩⟩
instance : has_div ℝ≥0 := ⟨λa b, ⟨a.1 / b.1, div_nonneg' a.2 b.2⟩⟩
instance : has_le ℝ≥0 := ⟨λ r s, (r:ℝ) ≤ s⟩
instance : has_bot ℝ≥0 := ⟨0⟩
instance : inhabited ℝ≥0 := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] protected lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] protected lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] protected lemma coe_add (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ + r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ + r₂ := rfl
@[simp] protected lemma coe_mul (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ * r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ * r₂ := rfl
@[simp] protected lemma coe_div (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ / r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ / r₂ := rfl
@[simp] protected lemma coe_sub (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) (h : r₂ ≤ r₁) : ((r₁ - r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ - r₂ :=
max_eq_left $ le_sub.2 $ by simp [show (r₂ : ℝ) ≤ r₁, from h]
-- TODO: setup semifield!
@[simp] protected lemma zero_div (r : nnreal) : 0 / r = 0 :=
nnreal.eq (zero_div _)
instance : comm_semiring ℝ≥0 :=
begin
refine { zero := 0, add := (+), one := 1, mul := (*), ..};
{ intros;
apply nnreal.eq;
simp [mul_comm, mul_assoc, add_comm_monoid.add, left_distrib, right_distrib,
add_comm_monoid.zero], }
end
@[simp] protected lemma coe_nat_cast : ∀(n : ℕ), (↑(↑n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = n
| 0 := rfl
| (n + 1) := by simp [coe_nat_cast n]
instance : decidable_linear_order ℝ≥0 :=
{ le := (≤),
lt := λa b, (a : ℝ) < b,
lt_iff_le_not_le := assume a b, @lt_iff_le_not_le ℝ _ a b,
le_refl := assume a, le_refl (a : ℝ),
le_trans := assume a b c, @le_trans ℝ _ a b c,
le_antisymm := assume a b hab hba, nnreal.eq $ le_antisymm hab hba,
le_total := assume a b, le_total (a : ℝ) b,
decidable_le := λa b, by apply_instance }
instance : canonically_ordered_monoid ℝ≥0 :=
{ add_le_add_left := assume a b h c, @add_le_add_left ℝ _ a b h c,
lt_of_add_lt_add_left := assume a b c, @lt_of_add_lt_add_left ℝ _ a b c,
le_iff_exists_add := assume ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩,
iff.intro
(assume h : a ≤ b,
⟨⟨b - a, le_sub_iff_add_le.2 $ by simp [h]⟩,
nnreal.eq $ show b = a + (b - a), by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]⟩)
(assume ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, eq⟩, eq.symm ▸ show a ≤ a + c, from (le_add_iff_nonneg_right a).2 hc),
..nnreal.comm_semiring,
..nnreal.decidable_linear_order}
instance : order_bot ℝ≥0 :=
{ bot := ⊥, bot_le := zero_le, .. nnreal.decidable_linear_order }
instance : distrib_lattice ℝ≥0 := by apply_instance
instance : semilattice_inf_bot ℝ≥0 :=
{ .. nnreal.lattice.order_bot, .. nnreal.lattice.distrib_lattice }
instance : semilattice_sup_bot ℝ≥0 :=
{ .. nnreal.lattice.order_bot, .. nnreal.lattice.distrib_lattice }
instance : linear_ordered_semiring ℝ≥0 :=
{ add_left_cancel := assume a b c h, nnreal.eq $ @add_left_cancel ℝ _ a b c (nnreal.eq_iff.2 h),
add_right_cancel := assume a b c h, nnreal.eq $ @add_right_cancel ℝ _ a b c (nnreal.eq_iff.2 h),
le_of_add_le_add_left := assume a b c, @le_of_add_le_add_left ℝ _ a b c,
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left := assume a b c, @mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ℝ _ a b c,
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right := assume a b c, @mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ℝ _ a b c,
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := assume a b c, @mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ℝ _ a b c,
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := assume a b c, @mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ℝ _ a b c,
zero_lt_one := @zero_lt_one ℝ _,
.. nnreal.decidable_linear_order,
.. nnreal.canonically_ordered_monoid,
.. nnreal.comm_semiring }
instance : topological_space ℝ≥0 := subtype.topological_space
instance : topological_semiring ℝ≥0 :=
{ continuous_mul :=
continuous_subtype_mk _
(continuous_mul (continuous.comp continuous_fst continuous_subtype_val)
(continuous.comp continuous_snd continuous_subtype_val)),
continuous_add :=
continuous_subtype_mk _
(continuous_add (continuous.comp continuous_fst continuous_subtype_val)
(continuous.comp continuous_snd continuous_subtype_val)) }
instance : orderable_topology ℝ≥0 :=
⟨ le_antisymm
begin
apply induced_le_iff_le_coinduced.2,
rw [orderable_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals ℝ],
apply generate_from_le,
assume s hs,
rcases hs with ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩,
{ show topological_space.generate_open _ {b : ℝ≥0 | a < b },
by_cases ha : 0 ≤ a,
{ exact topological_space.generate_open.basic _ ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, or.inl rfl⟩ },
{ have : a < 0, from lt_of_not_ge ha,
have : {b : ℝ≥0 | a < b } = set.univ,
from (set.eq_univ_iff_forall.2 $ assume b, lt_of_lt_of_le this b.2),
rw [this],
exact topological_space.generate_open.univ _ } },
{ show (topological_space.generate_from _).is_open {b : ℝ≥0 | a > b },
by_cases ha : 0 ≤ a,
{ exact topological_space.generate_open.basic _ ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, or.inr rfl⟩ },
{ have : {b : ℝ≥0 | a > b } = ∅,
from (set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ assume b hb, ha $
show 0 ≤ a, from le_trans b.2 (le_of_lt hb)),
rw [this],
apply @is_open_empty } },
end
(generate_from_le $ assume s hs,
match s, hs with
| _, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, or.inl rfl⟩ := ⟨{b : ℝ | a < b}, is_open_lt' a, rfl⟩
| _, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, or.inr rfl⟩ := ⟨{b : ℝ | b < a}, is_open_gt' a, set.ext $ assume b, iff.refl _⟩
end) ⟩
lemma tendsto_coe {f : filter α} {m : α → nnreal} :
∀{x : nnreal}, tendsto (λa, (m a : ℝ)) f (nhds (x : ℝ)) ↔ tendsto m f (nhds x)
| ⟨r, hr⟩ := by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_vmap, tendsto_vmap_iff]; refl
lemma sum_coe {s : finset α} {f : α → nnreal} :
s.sum (λa, (f a : ℝ)) = (s.sum f : nnreal) :=
finset.sum_hom _ rfl (assume a b, rfl)
lemma is_sum_coe {f : α → nnreal} {r : nnreal} : is_sum (λa, (f a : ℝ)) (r : ℝ) ↔ is_sum f r :=
by simp [is_sum, sum_coe, tendsto_coe]
lemma has_sum_coe {f : α → nnreal} : has_sum (λa, (f a : ℝ)) ↔ has_sum f :=
begin
simp [has_sum],
split,
exact assume ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨⟨a, is_sum_le (λa, (f a).2) is_sum_zero ha⟩, is_sum_coe.1 ha⟩,
exact assume ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨a.1, is_sum_coe.2 ha⟩
end
end nnreal
|
9e509bd6921c4479ec3d08d276c9deef20c3ada5 | 626e312b5c1cb2d88fca108f5933076012633192 | /src/analysis/convex/topology.lean | 28681ee56c515dfa8fbd17c94924d2a91dc3c066 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Bioye97/mathlib | 9db2f9ee54418d29dd06996279ba9dc874fd6beb | 782a20a27ee83b523f801ff34efb1a9557085019 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,305,956,488 | 1,631,067,774,000 | 1,631,067,774,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,633 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudriashov
-/
import analysis.convex.basic
import analysis.normed_space.finite_dimension
import topology.path_connected
/-!
# Topological and metric properties of convex sets
We prove the following facts:
* `convex.interior` : interior of a convex set is convex;
* `convex.closure` : closure of a convex set is convex;
* `set.finite.compact_convex_hull` : convex hull of a finite set is compact;
* `set.finite.is_closed_convex_hull` : convex hull of a finite set is closed;
* `convex_on_dist` : distance to a fixed point is convex on any convex set;
* `convex_hull_ediam`, `convex_hull_diam` : convex hull of a set has the same (e)metric diameter
as the original set;
* `bounded_convex_hull` : convex hull of a set is bounded if and only if the original set
is bounded.
* `bounded_std_simplex`, `is_closed_std_simplex`, `compact_std_simplex`: topological properties
of the standard simplex;
-/
variables {ι : Type*} {E : Type*}
open set
open_locale pointwise
lemma real.convex_iff_is_preconnected {s : set ℝ} : convex s ↔ is_preconnected s :=
real.convex_iff_ord_connected.trans is_preconnected_iff_ord_connected.symm
alias real.convex_iff_is_preconnected ↔ convex.is_preconnected is_preconnected.convex
/-! ### Standard simplex -/
section std_simplex
variables [fintype ι]
/-- Every vector in `std_simplex ι` has `max`-norm at most `1`. -/
lemma std_simplex_subset_closed_ball :
std_simplex ι ⊆ metric.closed_ball 0 1 :=
begin
assume f hf,
rw [metric.mem_closed_ball, dist_zero_right],
refine (nnreal.coe_one ▸ nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ finset.sup_le $ λ x hx, _),
change abs (f x) ≤ 1,
rw [abs_of_nonneg $ hf.1 x],
exact (mem_Icc_of_mem_std_simplex hf x).2
end
variable (ι)
/-- `std_simplex ι` is bounded. -/
lemma bounded_std_simplex : metric.bounded (std_simplex ι) :=
(metric.bounded_iff_subset_ball 0).2 ⟨1, std_simplex_subset_closed_ball⟩
/-- `std_simplex ι` is closed. -/
lemma is_closed_std_simplex : is_closed (std_simplex ι) :=
(std_simplex_eq_inter ι).symm ▸ is_closed.inter
(is_closed_Inter $ λ i, is_closed_le continuous_const (continuous_apply i))
(is_closed_eq (continuous_finset_sum _ $ λ x _, continuous_apply x) continuous_const)
/-- `std_simplex ι` is compact. -/
lemma compact_std_simplex : is_compact (std_simplex ι) :=
metric.compact_iff_closed_bounded.2 ⟨is_closed_std_simplex ι, bounded_std_simplex ι⟩
end std_simplex
/-! ### Topological vector space -/
section has_continuous_smul
variables [add_comm_group E] [module ℝ E] [topological_space E]
[topological_add_group E] [has_continuous_smul ℝ E]
/-- In a topological vector space, the interior of a convex set is convex. -/
lemma convex.interior {s : set E} (hs : convex s) : convex (interior s) :=
convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset.mpr $ λ a b ha hb hab,
have h : is_open (a • interior s + b • interior s), from
or.elim (classical.em (a = 0))
(λ heq,
have hne : b ≠ 0, by { rw [heq, zero_add] at hab, rw hab, exact one_ne_zero },
by { rw ← image_smul,
exact (is_open_map_smul' hne _ is_open_interior).add_left } )
(λ hne,
by { rw ← image_smul,
exact (is_open_map_smul' hne _ is_open_interior).add_right }),
(subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open h).mpr $ subset.trans
(by { simp only [← image_smul], apply add_subset_add; exact image_subset _ interior_subset })
(convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset.mp hs ha hb hab)
/-- In a topological vector space, the closure of a convex set is convex. -/
lemma convex.closure {s : set E} (hs : convex s) : convex (closure s) :=
λ x y hx hy a b ha hb hab,
let f : E → E → E := λ x' y', a • x' + b • y' in
have hf : continuous (λ p : E × E, f p.1 p.2), from
(continuous_const.smul continuous_fst).add (continuous_const.smul continuous_snd),
show f x y ∈ closure s, from
mem_closure_of_continuous2 hf hx hy (λ x' hx' y' hy', subset_closure
(hs hx' hy' ha hb hab))
/-- Convex hull of a finite set is compact. -/
lemma set.finite.compact_convex_hull {s : set E} (hs : finite s) :
is_compact (convex_hull s) :=
begin
rw [hs.convex_hull_eq_image],
apply (compact_std_simplex _).image,
haveI := hs.fintype,
apply linear_map.continuous_on_pi
end
/-- Convex hull of a finite set is closed. -/
lemma set.finite.is_closed_convex_hull [t2_space E] {s : set E} (hs : finite s) :
is_closed (convex_hull s) :=
hs.compact_convex_hull.is_closed
/-- If `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ interior s`, then the segment `(x, y]` is included in `interior s`. -/
lemma convex.add_smul_sub_mem_interior {s : set E} (hs : convex s)
{x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ interior s) {t : ℝ} (ht : t ∈ Ioc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
x + t • (y - x) ∈ interior s :=
begin
let f := λ z, x + t • (z - x),
have : is_open_map f := (is_open_map_add_left _).comp
((is_open_map_smul (units.mk0 _ ht.1.ne')).comp (is_open_map_sub_right _)),
apply mem_interior.2 ⟨f '' (interior s), _, this _ is_open_interior, mem_image_of_mem _ hy⟩,
refine image_subset_iff.2 (λ z hz, _),
exact hs.add_smul_sub_mem hx (interior_subset hz) ⟨ht.1.le, ht.2⟩,
end
/-- If `x ∈ s` and `x + y ∈ interior s`, then `x + t y ∈ interior s` for `t ∈ (0, 1]`. -/
lemma convex.add_smul_mem_interior {s : set E} (hs : convex s)
{x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : x + y ∈ interior s) {t : ℝ} (ht : t ∈ Ioc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
x + t • y ∈ interior s :=
by { convert hs.add_smul_sub_mem_interior hx hy ht, abel }
end has_continuous_smul
/-! ### Normed vector space -/
section normed_space
variables [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma convex_on_dist (z : E) (s : set E) (hs : convex s) :
convex_on s (λz', dist z' z) :=
and.intro hs $
assume x y hx hy a b ha hb hab,
calc
dist (a • x + b • y) z = ∥ (a • x + b • y) - (a + b) • z ∥ :
by rw [hab, one_smul, normed_group.dist_eq]
... = ∥a • (x - z) + b • (y - z)∥ :
by rw [add_smul, smul_sub, smul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add,
←add_assoc, add_assoc (a • x), add_comm (b • y)]; simp only [add_assoc]
... ≤ ∥a • (x - z)∥ + ∥b • (y - z)∥ :
norm_add_le (a • (x - z)) (b • (y - z))
... = a * dist x z + b * dist y z :
by simp [norm_smul, normed_group.dist_eq, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ha, abs_of_nonneg hb]
lemma convex_ball (a : E) (r : ℝ) : convex (metric.ball a r) :=
by simpa only [metric.ball, sep_univ] using (convex_on_dist a _ convex_univ).convex_lt r
lemma convex_closed_ball (a : E) (r : ℝ) : convex (metric.closed_ball a r) :=
by simpa only [metric.closed_ball, sep_univ] using (convex_on_dist a _ convex_univ).convex_le r
/-- Given a point `x` in the convex hull of `s` and a point `y`, there exists a point
of `s` at distance at least `dist x y` from `y`. -/
lemma convex_hull_exists_dist_ge {s : set E} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ convex_hull s) (y : E) :
∃ x' ∈ s, dist x y ≤ dist x' y :=
(convex_on_dist y _ (convex_convex_hull _)).exists_ge_of_mem_convex_hull hx
/-- Given a point `x` in the convex hull of `s` and a point `y` in the convex hull of `t`,
there exist points `x' ∈ s` and `y' ∈ t` at distance at least `dist x y`. -/
lemma convex_hull_exists_dist_ge2 {s t : set E} {x y : E}
(hx : x ∈ convex_hull s) (hy : y ∈ convex_hull t) :
∃ (x' ∈ s) (y' ∈ t), dist x y ≤ dist x' y' :=
begin
rcases convex_hull_exists_dist_ge hx y with ⟨x', hx', Hx'⟩,
rcases convex_hull_exists_dist_ge hy x' with ⟨y', hy', Hy'⟩,
use [x', hx', y', hy'],
exact le_trans Hx' (dist_comm y x' ▸ dist_comm y' x' ▸ Hy')
end
/-- Emetric diameter of the convex hull of a set `s` equals the emetric diameter of `s. -/
@[simp] lemma convex_hull_ediam (s : set E) :
emetric.diam (convex_hull s) = emetric.diam s :=
begin
refine (emetric.diam_le $ λ x hx y hy, _).antisymm (emetric.diam_mono $ subset_convex_hull s),
rcases convex_hull_exists_dist_ge2 hx hy with ⟨x', hx', y', hy', H⟩,
rw edist_dist,
apply le_trans (ennreal.of_real_le_of_real H),
rw ← edist_dist,
exact emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx' hy'
end
/-- Diameter of the convex hull of a set `s` equals the emetric diameter of `s. -/
@[simp] lemma convex_hull_diam (s : set E) :
metric.diam (convex_hull s) = metric.diam s :=
by simp only [metric.diam, convex_hull_ediam]
/-- Convex hull of `s` is bounded if and only if `s` is bounded. -/
@[simp] lemma bounded_convex_hull {s : set E} :
metric.bounded (convex_hull s) ↔ metric.bounded s :=
by simp only [metric.bounded_iff_ediam_ne_top, convex_hull_ediam]
lemma convex.is_path_connected {s : set E} (hconv : convex s) (hne : s.nonempty) :
is_path_connected s :=
begin
refine is_path_connected_iff.mpr ⟨hne, _⟩,
intros x y x_in y_in,
let f := λ θ : ℝ, x + θ • (y - x),
have hf : continuous f, by continuity,
have h₀ : f 0 = x, by simp [f],
have h₁ : f 1 = y, by { dsimp [f], rw one_smul, abel },
have H := hconv.segment_subset x_in y_in,
rw segment_eq_image' at H,
exact joined_in.of_line hf.continuous_on h₀ h₁ H
end
@[priority 100]
instance normed_space.path_connected : path_connected_space E :=
path_connected_space_iff_univ.mpr $ convex_univ.is_path_connected ⟨(0 : E), trivial⟩
@[priority 100]
instance normed_space.loc_path_connected : loc_path_connected_space E :=
loc_path_connected_of_bases (λ x, metric.nhds_basis_ball)
(λ x r r_pos, (convex_ball x r).is_path_connected $ by simp [r_pos])
end normed_space
|
0f3c105d041ade1a0807db67d9c0b95ca7d87fa4 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /test/lint.lean | c790a16ca3c9b7ffbdc4f5fa636c8250b75372d2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,320 | lean | import tactic.lint
import algebra.ring
def foo1 (n m : ℕ) : ℕ := n + 1
def foo2 (n m : ℕ) : m = m := by refl
lemma foo3 (n m : ℕ) : ℕ := n - m
lemma foo.foo (n m : ℕ) : n ≥ n := le_refl n
instance bar.bar : has_add ℕ := by apply_instance -- we don't check the name of instances
lemma foo.bar (ε > 0) : ε = ε := rfl -- >/≥ is allowed in binders (and in fact, in all hypotheses)
-- section
-- local attribute [instance, priority 1001] classical.prop_decidable
-- lemma foo4 : (if 3 = 3 then 1 else 2) = 1 := if_pos (by refl)
-- end
open tactic
meta def fold_over_with_cond {α} (l : list declaration) (tac : declaration → tactic (option α)) :
tactic (list (declaration × α)) :=
l.mmap_filter $ λ d, option.map (λ x, (d, x)) <$> tac d
run_cmd do
let t := name × list ℕ,
e ← get_env,
let l := e.filter (λ d, e.in_current_file' d.to_name ∧ ¬ d.is_auto_or_internal e),
l2 ← fold_over_with_cond l (return ∘ check_unused_arguments),
guard $ l2.length = 4,
let l2 : list t := l2.map $ λ x, ⟨x.1.to_name, x.2⟩,
guard $ (⟨`foo1, [2]⟩ : t) ∈ l2,
guard $ (⟨`foo2, [1]⟩ : t) ∈ l2,
guard $ (⟨`foo.foo, [2]⟩ : t) ∈ l2,
guard $ (⟨`foo.bar, [2]⟩ : t) ∈ l2,
l2 ← fold_over_with_cond l linter.def_lemma.test,
guard $ l2.length = 2,
let l2 : list (name × _) := l2.map $ λ x, ⟨x.1.to_name, x.2⟩,
guard $ ∃(x ∈ l2), (x : name × _).1 = `foo2,
guard $ ∃(x ∈ l2), (x : name × _).1 = `foo3,
l3 ← fold_over_with_cond l linter.dup_namespace.test,
guard $ l3.length = 1,
guard $ ∃(x ∈ l3), (x : declaration × _).1.to_name = `foo.foo,
l4 ← fold_over_with_cond l linter.ge_or_gt.test,
guard $ l4.length = 1,
guard $ ∃(x ∈ l4), (x : declaration × _).1.to_name = `foo.foo,
-- guard $ ∃(x ∈ l4), (x : declaration × _).1.to_name = `foo4,
(_, s) ← lint ff,
guard $ "/- (slow tests skipped) -/\n".is_suffix_of s.to_string,
(_, s2) ← lint tt,
guard $ s.to_string ≠ s2.to_string,
skip
/- check customizability and nolint -/
meta def dummy_check (d : declaration) : tactic (option string) :=
return $ if d.to_name.last = "foo" then some "gotcha!" else none
meta def linter.dummy_linter : linter :=
{ test := dummy_check,
auto_decls := ff,
no_errors_found := "found nothing",
errors_found := "found something" }
@[nolint dummy_linter]
def bar.foo : (if 3 = 3 then 1 else 2) = 1 := if_pos (by refl)
run_cmd do
(_, s) ← lint tt tt [`linter.dummy_linter] tt,
guard $ "/- found something: -/\n#print foo.foo /- gotcha! -/\n".is_suffix_of s.to_string
def incorrect_type_class_argument_test {α : Type} (x : α) [x = x] [decidable_eq α] [group α] :
unit := ()
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `incorrect_type_class_argument_test,
x ← linter.incorrect_type_class_argument.test d,
guard $ x = some "These are not classes. argument 3: [_inst_1 : x = x]"
section
def impossible_instance_test {α β : Type} [add_group α] : has_add α := infer_instance
local attribute [instance] impossible_instance_test
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `impossible_instance_test,
x ← linter.impossible_instance.test d,
guard $ x = some "Impossible to infer argument 2: {β : Type}"
def dangerous_instance_test {α β γ : Type} [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [has_coe α β]
[has_inv γ] : has_add β := infer_instance
local attribute [instance] dangerous_instance_test
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `dangerous_instance_test,
x ← linter.dangerous_instance.test d,
guard $ x = some "The following arguments become metavariables. argument 1: {α : Type}, argument 3: {γ : Type}"
end
section
def foo_has_mul {α} [has_mul α] : has_mul α := infer_instance
local attribute [instance, priority 1] foo_has_mul
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `has_mul,
some s ← fails_quickly 100 d,
guard $ s = "type-class inference timed out"
local attribute [instance, priority 10000] foo_has_mul
run_cmd do
d ← get_decl `has_mul,
some s ← fails_quickly 3000 d,
guard $ "maximum class-instance resolution depth has been reached".is_prefix_of s
end
/- test of `apply_to_fresh_variables` -/
run_cmd do
e ← mk_const `id,
e2 ← apply_to_fresh_variables e,
type_check e2,
`(@id %%α %%a) ← instantiate_mvars e2,
expr.sort (level.succ $ level.mvar u) ← infer_type α,
skip
|
628d67e30fd7e6a97c53fc2b696f5669cc3c8684 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/propext.lean | 2d6362a889747d5adf20ca9b633496b1b7bcbacf | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,615 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.logic
universes u
namespace Mathlib
axiom propext {a : Prop} {b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) → a = b/- Additional congruence lemmas. -/
theorem forall_congr_eq {a : Sort u} {p : a → Prop} {q : a → Prop} (h : ∀ (x : a), p x = q x) : (∀ (x : a), p x) = ∀ (x : a), q x :=
propext (forall_congr fun (a : a) => eq.to_iff (h a))
theorem imp_congr_eq {a : Prop} {b : Prop} {c : Prop} {d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr (eq.to_iff h₁) (eq.to_iff h₂))
theorem imp_congr_ctx_eq {a : Prop} {b : Prop} {c : Prop} {d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : c → b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr_ctx (eq.to_iff h₁) fun (hc : c) => eq.to_iff (h₂ hc))
theorem eq_true_intro {a : Prop} (h : a) : a = True :=
propext (iff_true_intro h)
theorem eq_false_intro {a : Prop} (h : ¬a) : a = False :=
propext (iff_false_intro h)
theorem iff.to_eq {a : Prop} {b : Prop} (h : a ↔ b) : a = b :=
propext h
theorem iff_eq_eq {a : Prop} {b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b) :=
propext { mp := fun (h : a ↔ b) => iff.to_eq h, mpr := fun (h : a = b) => eq.to_iff h }
theorem eq_false {a : Prop} : a = False = (¬a) :=
(fun (this : (a ↔ False) = (¬a)) => iff_eq_eq ▸ this) (propext (iff_false a))
theorem eq_true {a : Prop} : a = True = a :=
(fun (this : (a ↔ True) = a) => iff_eq_eq ▸ this) (propext (iff_true a))
|
c34fb24ac5d05e4324e73e158955b02ed6909680 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/hit/pointed_pushout.hlean | 2431ae8a0127afabdb64aa6824195499ad3c386f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,531 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
Pointed Pushouts
-/
import .pushout types.pointed2
open eq pushout
namespace pointed
definition pointed_pushout [instance] [constructor] {TL BL TR : Type} [HTL : pointed TL]
[HBL : pointed BL] [HTR : pointed TR] (f : TL → BL) (g : TL → TR) : pointed (pushout f g) :=
pointed.mk (inl (point _))
end pointed
open pointed pType
namespace pushout
section
parameters {TL BL TR : Type*} (f : TL →* BL) (g : TL →* TR)
definition ppushout [constructor] : Type* :=
pointed.mk' (pushout f g)
parameters {f g}
definition pinl [constructor] : BL →* ppushout :=
pmap.mk inl idp
definition pinr [constructor] : TR →* ppushout :=
pmap.mk inr ((ap inr (respect_pt g))⁻¹ ⬝ !glue⁻¹ ⬝ (ap inl (respect_pt f)))
definition pglue (x : TL) : pinl (f x) = pinr (g x) := -- TODO do we need this?
!glue
definition prec {P : ppushout → Type} (Pinl : Π x, P (pinl x)) (Pinr : Π x, P (pinr x))
(H : Π x, Pinl (f x) =[pglue x] Pinr (g x)) : (Π y, P y) :=
pushout.rec Pinl Pinr H
end
section
variables {TL BL TR : Type*} (f : TL →* BL) (g : TL →* TR)
protected definition psymm [constructor] : ppushout f g ≃* ppushout g f :=
begin
fapply pequiv_of_equiv,
{ apply pushout.symm},
{ exact ap inr (respect_pt f)⁻¹ ⬝ !glue⁻¹ ⬝ ap inl (respect_pt g)}
end
end
end pushout
|
31696ca4dbfb692d6996e6b916b43683860cb801 | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/geometry/manifold/vector_bundle/fiberwise_linear.lean | cd9e5a761d63a14a8527fa95dc3c63a3e2da4096 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,017 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import geometry.manifold.cont_mdiff
/-! # The groupoid of smooth, fiberwise-linear maps
This file contains preliminaries for the definition of a smooth vector bundle: an associated
`structure_groupoid`, the groupoid of `smooth_fiberwise_linear` functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open set topological_space
open_locale manifold topology
/-! ### The groupoid of smooth, fiberwise-linear maps -/
variables {𝕜 B F : Type*} [topological_space B]
variables [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
namespace fiberwise_linear
variables {φ φ' : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F} {U U' : set B}
/-- For `B` a topological space and `F` a `𝕜`-normed space, a map from `U : set B` to `F ≃L[𝕜] F`
determines a local homeomorphism from `B × F` to itself by its action fiberwise. -/
def local_homeomorph (φ : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F) (hU : is_open U)
(hφ : continuous_on (λ x, φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : continuous_on (λ x, (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U) :
local_homeomorph (B × F) (B × F) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, (x.1, φ x.1 x.2),
inv_fun := λ x, (x.1, (φ x.1).symm x.2),
source := U ×ˢ univ,
target := U ×ˢ univ,
map_source' := λ x hx, mk_mem_prod hx.1 (mem_univ _),
map_target' := λ x hx, mk_mem_prod hx.1 (mem_univ _),
left_inv' := λ x _, prod.ext rfl (continuous_linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply _ _),
right_inv' := λ x _, prod.ext rfl (continuous_linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply _ _),
open_source := hU.prod is_open_univ,
open_target := hU.prod is_open_univ,
continuous_to_fun := begin
have : continuous_on (λ p : B × F, ((φ p.1 : F →L[𝕜] F), p.2)) (U ×ˢ univ),
{ exact hφ.prod_map continuous_on_id },
exact continuous_on_fst.prod (is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply.continuous.comp_continuous_on this),
end,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
have : continuous_on (λ p : B × F, (((φ p.1).symm : F →L[𝕜] F), p.2)) (U ×ˢ univ),
{ exact h2φ.prod_map continuous_on_id },
exact continuous_on_fst.prod (is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply.continuous.comp_continuous_on this),
end, }
/-- Compute the composition of two local homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
lemma trans_local_homeomorph_apply
(hU : is_open U)
(hφ : continuous_on (λ x, φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : continuous_on (λ x, (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(hU' : is_open U')
(hφ' : continuous_on (λ x, φ' x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
(h2φ' : continuous_on (λ x, (φ' x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
(b : B) (v : F) :
(fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ hU hφ h2φ ≫ₕ
fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ' hU' hφ' h2φ') ⟨b, v⟩ = ⟨b, φ' b (φ b v)⟩ :=
rfl
/-- Compute the source of the composition of two local homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
lemma source_trans_local_homeomorph
(hU : is_open U)
(hφ : continuous_on (λ x, φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : continuous_on (λ x, (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(hU' : is_open U')
(hφ' : continuous_on (λ x, φ' x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
(h2φ' : continuous_on (λ x, (φ' x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U') :
(fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ hU hφ h2φ ≫ₕ
fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ' hU' hφ' h2φ').source = (U ∩ U') ×ˢ univ :=
by { dsimp only [fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph], mfld_set_tac }
/-- Compute the target of the composition of two local homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
lemma target_trans_local_homeomorph
(hU : is_open U)
(hφ : continuous_on (λ x, φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : continuous_on (λ x, (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(hU' : is_open U')
(hφ' : continuous_on (λ x, φ' x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
(h2φ' : continuous_on (λ x, (φ' x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U') :
(fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ hU hφ h2φ ≫ₕ
fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ' hU' hφ' h2φ').target = (U ∩ U') ×ˢ univ :=
by { dsimp only [fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph], mfld_set_tac }
end fiberwise_linear
variables {EB : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group EB] [normed_space 𝕜 EB]
{HB : Type*} [topological_space HB] [charted_space HB B] {IB : model_with_corners 𝕜 EB HB}
/-- Let `e` be a local homeomorphism of `B × F`. Suppose that at every point `p` in the source of
`e`, there is some neighbourhood `s` of `p` on which `e` is equal to a bi-smooth fiberwise linear
local homeomorphism.
Then the source of `e` is of the form `U ×ˢ univ`, for some set `U` in `B`, and, at any point `x` in
`U`, admits a neighbourhood `u` of `x` such that `e` is equal on `u ×ˢ univ` to some bi-smooth
fiberwise linear local homeomorphism. -/
lemma smooth_fiberwise_linear.locality_aux₁ (e : local_homeomorph (B × F) (B × F))
(h : ∀ p ∈ e.source, ∃ s : set (B × F), is_open s ∧ p ∈ s ∧
∃ (φ : B → (F ≃L[𝕜] F)) (u : set B) (hu : is_open u)
(hφ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, (φ x : F →L[𝕜] F)) u)
(h2φ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, ((φ x).symm : F →L[𝕜] F)) u),
(e.restr s).eq_on_source
(fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ hu hφ.continuous_on h2φ.continuous_on)) :
∃ (U : set B) (hU : e.source = U ×ˢ univ),
∀ x ∈ U, ∃ (φ : B → (F ≃L[𝕜] F)) (u : set B) (hu : is_open u) (huU : u ⊆ U) (hux : x ∈ u)
(hφ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, (φ x : F →L[𝕜] F)) u)
(h2φ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, ((φ x).symm : F →L[𝕜] F)) u),
(e.restr (u ×ˢ univ)).eq_on_source
(fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ hu hφ.continuous_on h2φ.continuous_on) :=
begin
rw [set_coe.forall'] at h,
-- choose s hs hsp φ u hu hφ h2φ heφ using h,
-- the following 2 lines should be `choose s hs hsp φ u hu hφ h2φ heφ using h,`
-- `choose` produces a proof term that takes a long time to type-check by the kernel (it seems)
-- porting note: todo: try using `choose` again in Lean 4
simp only [classical.skolem, ← exists_prop] at h,
rcases h with ⟨s, hs, hsp, φ, u, hu, hφ, h2φ, heφ⟩,
have hesu : ∀ p : e.source, e.source ∩ s p = u p ×ˢ univ,
{ intros p,
rw ← e.restr_source' (s _) (hs _),
exact (heφ p).1 },
have hu' : ∀ p : e.source, (p : B × F).fst ∈ u p,
{ intros p,
have : (p : B × F) ∈ e.source ∩ s p := ⟨p.prop, hsp p⟩,
simpa only [hesu, mem_prod, mem_univ, and_true] using this },
have heu : ∀ p : e.source, ∀ q : B × F, q.fst ∈ u p → q ∈ e.source,
{ intros p q hq,
have : q ∈ u p ×ˢ (univ : set F) := ⟨hq, trivial⟩,
rw ← hesu p at this,
exact this.1 },
have he : e.source = (prod.fst '' e.source) ×ˢ (univ : set F),
{ apply has_subset.subset.antisymm,
{ intros p hp,
exact ⟨⟨p, hp, rfl⟩, trivial⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨x, v⟩ ⟨⟨p, hp, rfl : p.fst = x⟩, -⟩,
exact heu ⟨p, hp⟩ (p.fst, v) (hu' ⟨p, hp⟩) } },
refine ⟨prod.fst '' e.source, he, _⟩,
rintros x ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨φ ⟨p, hp⟩, u ⟨p, hp⟩, hu ⟨p, hp⟩, _, hu' _, hφ ⟨p, hp⟩, h2φ ⟨p, hp⟩, _⟩,
{ intros y hy, refine ⟨(y, 0), heu ⟨p, hp⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ hy, rfl⟩ },
{ rw [← hesu, e.restr_source_inter], exact heφ ⟨p, hp⟩ },
end
/-- Let `e` be a local homeomorphism of `B × F` whose source is `U ×ˢ univ`, for some set `U` in
`B`, and which, at any point `x` in `U`, admits a neighbourhood `u` of `x` such that `e` is equal on
`u ×ˢ univ` to some bi-smooth fiberwise linear local homeomorphism. Then `e` itself is equal to
some bi-smooth fiberwise linear local homeomorphism.
This is the key mathematical point of the `locality` condition in the construction of the
`structure_groupoid` of bi-smooth fiberwise linear local homeomorphisms. The proof is by gluing
together the various bi-smooth fiberwise linear local homeomorphism which exist locally.
The `U` in the conclusion is the same `U` as in the hypothesis. We state it like this, because this
is exactly what we need for `smooth_fiberwise_linear`. -/
lemma smooth_fiberwise_linear.locality_aux₂ (e : local_homeomorph (B × F) (B × F))
(U : set B) (hU : e.source = U ×ˢ univ)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, ∃ (φ : B → (F ≃L[𝕜] F)) (u : set B) (hu : is_open u) (hUu : u ⊆ U) (hux : x ∈ u)
(hφ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, (φ x : F →L[𝕜] F)) u)
(h2φ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, ((φ x).symm : F →L[𝕜] F)) u),
(e.restr (u ×ˢ univ)).eq_on_source
(fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ hu hφ.continuous_on h2φ.continuous_on)) :
∃ (Φ : B → (F ≃L[𝕜] F)) (U : set B) (hU₀ : is_open U)
(hΦ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, (Φ x : F →L[𝕜] F)) U)
(h2Φ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, ((Φ x).symm : F →L[𝕜] F)) U),
e.eq_on_source (fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph Φ hU₀ hΦ.continuous_on h2Φ.continuous_on) :=
begin
classical,
rw set_coe.forall' at h,
choose! φ u hu hUu hux hφ h2φ heφ using h,
have heuφ : ∀ x : U, eq_on e (λ q, (q.1, φ x q.1 q.2)) (u x ×ˢ univ),
{ intros x p hp,
refine (heφ x).2 _,
rw (heφ x).1,
exact hp },
have huφ : ∀ (x x' : U) (y : B) (hyx : y ∈ u x) (hyx' : y ∈ u x'), φ x y = φ x' y,
{ intros p p' y hyp hyp',
ext v,
have h1 : e (y, v) = (y, φ p y v) := heuφ _ ⟨(id hyp : (y, v).fst ∈ u p), trivial⟩,
have h2 : e (y, v) = (y, φ p' y v) := heuφ _ ⟨(id hyp' : (y, v).fst ∈ u p'), trivial⟩,
exact congr_arg prod.snd (h1.symm.trans h2) },
have hUu' : U = ⋃ i, u i,
{ ext x,
rw mem_Union,
refine ⟨λ h, ⟨⟨x, h⟩, hux _⟩, _⟩,
rintros ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact hUu x hx },
have hU' : is_open U,
{ rw hUu',
apply is_open_Union hu },
let Φ₀ : U → F ≃L[𝕜] F := Union_lift u (λ x, (φ x) ∘ coe) huφ U hUu'.le,
let Φ : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F := λ y, if hy : y ∈ U then Φ₀ ⟨y, hy⟩ else continuous_linear_equiv.refl 𝕜 F,
have hΦ : ∀ (y) (hy : y ∈ U), Φ y = Φ₀ ⟨y, hy⟩ := λ y hy, dif_pos hy,
have hΦφ : ∀ x : U, ∀ y ∈ u x, Φ y = φ x y,
{ intros x y hyu,
refine (hΦ y (hUu x hyu)).trans _,
exact Union_lift_mk ⟨y, hyu⟩ _ },
have hΦ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ y, (Φ y : F →L[𝕜] F)) U,
{ apply cont_mdiff_on_of_locally_cont_mdiff_on,
intros x hx,
refine ⟨u ⟨x, hx⟩, hu ⟨x, hx⟩, hux _, _⟩,
refine (cont_mdiff_on.congr (hφ ⟨x, hx⟩) _).mono (inter_subset_right _ _),
intros y hy,
rw hΦφ ⟨x, hx⟩ y hy },
have h2Φ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ y, ((Φ y).symm : F →L[𝕜] F)) U,
{ apply cont_mdiff_on_of_locally_cont_mdiff_on,
intros x hx,
refine ⟨u ⟨x, hx⟩, hu ⟨x, hx⟩, hux _, _⟩,
refine (cont_mdiff_on.congr (h2φ ⟨x, hx⟩) _).mono (inter_subset_right _ _),
intros y hy,
rw hΦφ ⟨x, hx⟩ y hy },
refine ⟨Φ, U, hU', hΦ, h2Φ, hU, λ p hp, _⟩,
rw [hU] at hp,
-- using rw on the next line seems to cause a timeout in kernel type-checking
refine (heuφ ⟨p.fst, hp.1⟩ ⟨hux _, hp.2⟩).trans _,
congrm (_, _),
rw hΦφ,
apply hux
end
variables (F B IB)
/-- For `B` a manifold and `F` a normed space, the groupoid on `B × F` consisting of local
homeomorphisms which are bi-smooth and fiberwise linear, and induce the identity on `B`.
When a (topological) vector bundle is smooth, then the composition of charts associated
to the vector bundle belong to this groupoid. -/
def smooth_fiberwise_linear : structure_groupoid (B × F) :=
{ members := ⋃ (φ : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F) (U : set B) (hU : is_open U)
(hφ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U),
{e | e.eq_on_source (fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ hU hφ.continuous_on h2φ.continuous_on)},
trans' := begin
simp_rw [mem_Union],
rintros e e' ⟨φ, U, hU, hφ, h2φ, heφ⟩ ⟨φ', U', hU', hφ', h2φ', heφ'⟩,
refine ⟨λ b, (φ b).trans (φ' b), _, hU.inter hU', _, _, setoid.trans (heφ.trans' heφ') ⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ show smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F)
(λ (x : B), (φ' x).to_continuous_linear_map ∘L (φ x).to_continuous_linear_map) (U ∩ U'),
exact (hφ'.mono $ inter_subset_right _ _).clm_comp (hφ.mono $ inter_subset_left _ _) },
{ show smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ (x : B),
(φ x).symm.to_continuous_linear_map ∘L (φ' x).symm.to_continuous_linear_map) (U ∩ U'),
exact (h2φ.mono $ inter_subset_left _ _).clm_comp (h2φ'.mono $ inter_subset_right _ _) },
{ apply fiberwise_linear.source_trans_local_homeomorph },
{ rintros ⟨b, v⟩ hb, apply fiberwise_linear.trans_local_homeomorph_apply }
end,
symm' := begin
simp_rw [mem_Union],
rintros e ⟨φ, U, hU, hφ, h2φ, heφ⟩,
refine ⟨λ b, (φ b).symm, U, hU, h2φ, _, heφ.symm'⟩,
simp_rw continuous_linear_equiv.symm_symm,
exact hφ
end,
id_mem' := begin
simp_rw [mem_Union],
refine ⟨λ b, continuous_linear_equiv.refl 𝕜 F, univ, is_open_univ, _, _, ⟨_, λ b hb, _⟩⟩,
{ apply cont_mdiff_on_const },
{ apply cont_mdiff_on_const },
{ simp only [fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph, local_homeomorph.refl_local_equiv,
local_equiv.refl_source, univ_prod_univ] },
{ simp only [fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph, local_homeomorph.refl_apply, prod.mk.eta,
id.def, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_refl', local_homeomorph.mk_coe, local_equiv.coe_mk] },
end,
locality' := begin -- the hard work has been extracted to `locality_aux₁` and `locality_aux₂`
simp_rw [mem_Union],
intros e he,
obtain ⟨U, hU, h⟩ := smooth_fiberwise_linear.locality_aux₁ e he,
exact smooth_fiberwise_linear.locality_aux₂ e U hU h,
end,
eq_on_source' := begin
simp_rw [mem_Union],
rintros e e' ⟨φ, U, hU, hφ, h2φ, heφ⟩ hee',
exact ⟨φ, U, hU, hφ, h2φ, setoid.trans hee' heφ⟩,
end }
@[simp] lemma mem_smooth_fiberwise_linear_iff (e : local_homeomorph (B × F) (B × F)) :
e ∈ smooth_fiberwise_linear B F IB ↔
∃ (φ : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F) (U : set B) (hU : is_open U)
(hφ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : smooth_on IB 𝓘(𝕜, F →L[𝕜] F) (λ x, (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U),
e.eq_on_source (fiberwise_linear.local_homeomorph φ hU hφ.continuous_on h2φ.continuous_on) :=
show e ∈ set.Union _ ↔ _, by { simp only [mem_Union], refl }
|
7aec61dd38e82a7db64befc0221b6304464a5496 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/linear_algebra/free_module/finite/rank.lean | e82c8e6b8d92842b26c2417b7d6fe9ccd3d0bf13 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,959 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import linear_algebra.free_module.rank
import linear_algebra.free_module.finite.basic
/-!
# Rank of finite free modules
This is a basic API for the rank of finite free modules.
-/
--TODO: `linear_algebra/finite_dimensional` should import this file, and a lot of results should
--be moved here.
universes u v w
variables (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (N : Type w)
open_locale tensor_product direct_sum big_operators cardinal
open cardinal finite_dimensional fintype
namespace module.free
section ring
variables [ring R] [strong_rank_condition R]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [module.free R M] [module.finite R M]
variables [add_comm_group N] [module R N] [module.free R N] [module.finite R N]
/-- The rank of a finite and free module is finite. -/
lemma rank_lt_omega : module.rank R M < ω :=
begin
letI := nontrivial_of_invariant_basis_number R,
rw [← (choose_basis R M).mk_eq_dim'', lt_omega_iff_fintype],
exact nonempty.intro infer_instance
end
/-- If `M` is finite and free, `finrank M = rank M`. -/
@[simp] lemma finrank_eq_rank : ↑(finrank R M) = module.rank R M :=
by { rw [finrank, cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega (rank_lt_omega R M)] }
/-- The finrank of a free module `M` over `R` is the cardinality of `choose_basis_index R M`. -/
lemma finrank_eq_card_choose_basis_index : finrank R M = @card (choose_basis_index R M)
(@choose_basis_index.fintype R M _ _ _ _ (nontrivial_of_invariant_basis_number R) _) :=
begin
letI := nontrivial_of_invariant_basis_number R,
simp [finrank, rank_eq_card_choose_basis_index]
end
/-- The finrank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `fintype.card ι`. -/
@[simp] lemma finrank_finsupp {ι : Type v} [fintype ι] : finrank R (ι →₀ R) = card ι :=
by { rw [finrank, rank_finsupp, ← mk_to_nat_eq_card, to_nat_lift] }
/-- The finrank of `(ι → R)` is `fintype.card ι`. -/
lemma finrank_pi {ι : Type v} [fintype ι] : finrank R (ι → R) = card ι :=
by simp [finrank]
/-- The finrank of the direct sum is the sum of the finranks. -/
@[simp] lemma finrank_direct_sum {ι : Type v} [fintype ι] (M : ι → Type w)
[Π (i : ι), add_comm_group (M i)] [Π (i : ι), module R (M i)] [Π (i : ι), module.free R (M i)]
[Π (i : ι), module.finite R (M i)] : finrank R (⨁ i, M i) = ∑ i, finrank R (M i) :=
begin
letI := nontrivial_of_invariant_basis_number R,
simp only [finrank, λ i, rank_eq_card_choose_basis_index R (M i), rank_direct_sum,
← mk_sigma, mk_to_nat_eq_card, card_sigma],
end
/-- The finrank of `M × N` is `(finrank R M) + (finrank R N)`. -/
@[simp] lemma finrank_prod : finrank R (M × N) = (finrank R M) + (finrank R N) :=
by { simp [finrank, rank_lt_omega R M, rank_lt_omega R N] }
/-- The finrank of a finite product is the sum of the finranks. -/
--TODO: this should follow from `linear_equiv.finrank_eq`, that is over a field.
lemma finrank_pi_fintype {ι : Type v} [fintype ι] {M : ι → Type w}
[Π (i : ι), add_comm_group (M i)] [Π (i : ι), module R (M i)] [Π (i : ι), module.free R (M i)]
[Π (i : ι), module.finite R (M i)] : finrank R (Π i, M i) = ∑ i, finrank R (M i) :=
begin
letI := nontrivial_of_invariant_basis_number R,
simp only [finrank, λ i, rank_eq_card_choose_basis_index R (M i), rank_pi_fintype,
← mk_sigma, mk_to_nat_eq_card, card_sigma],
end
/-- If `m` and `n` are `fintype`, the finrank of `m × n` matrices is
`(fintype.card m) * (fintype.card n)`. -/
lemma finrank_matrix (m n : Type v) [fintype m] [fintype n] :
finrank R (matrix m n R) = (card m) * (card n) :=
by { simp [finrank] }
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [strong_rank_condition R]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [module.free R M] [module.finite R M]
variables [add_comm_group N] [module R N] [module.free R N] [module.finite R N]
/-- The finrank of `M →ₗ[R] N` is `(finrank R M) * (finrank R N)`. -/
--TODO: this should follow from `linear_equiv.finrank_eq`, that is over a field.
lemma finrank_linear_hom : finrank R (M →ₗ[R] N) = (finrank R M) * (finrank R N) :=
begin
classical,
letI := nontrivial_of_invariant_basis_number R,
have h := (linear_map.to_matrix (choose_basis R M) (choose_basis R N)),
let b := (matrix.std_basis _ _ _).map h.symm,
rw [finrank, dim_eq_card_basis b, ← mk_fintype, mk_to_nat_eq_card, finrank, finrank,
rank_eq_card_choose_basis_index, rank_eq_card_choose_basis_index, mk_to_nat_eq_card,
mk_to_nat_eq_card, card_prod, mul_comm]
end
/-- The finrank of `M ⊗[R] N` is `(finrank R M) * (finrank R N)`. -/
@[simp] lemma finrank_tensor_product (M : Type v) (N : Type w) [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
[module.free R M] [add_comm_group N] [module R N] [module.free R N] :
finrank R (M ⊗[R] N) = (finrank R M) * (finrank R N) :=
by { simp [finrank] }
end comm_ring
end module.free
|
b2ac8aa91fbe66411ffd05061ad628d8bf7c8f56 | df561f413cfe0a88b1056655515399c546ff32a5 | /8-inequality-world/l2.lean | 4c951933f24d89d5b079a1d64c72220f434ee776 | [] | no_license | nicholaspun/natural-number-game-solutions | 31d5158415c6f582694680044c5c6469032c2a06 | 1e2aed86d2e76a3f4a275c6d99e795ad30cf6df0 | refs/heads/main | 1,675,123,625,012 | 1,607,633,548,000 | 1,607,633,548,000 | 318,933,860 | 3 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 83 | lean | lemma le_refl (x : mynat) : x ≤ x :=
begin
use 0,
symmetry,
exact add_zero x,
end |
eaea9af5cc8559b9eda9ababc747391a81010130 | 94637389e03c919023691dcd05bd4411b1034aa5 | /src/inClassNotes/final/arith_expr.lean | b1324947c5c2a0d0d65f6bfeaace0c8cdc6c9ce1 | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/complogic-s21 | 7c4eef2105abad899e46502270d9829d913e8afc | 99039501b770248c8ceb39890be5dfe129dc1082 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,985,669,944 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 335,706,272 | 0 | 38 | null | 1,618,325,669,000 | 1,612,374,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,211 | lean | import .env
-- Abstract syntax of arithmetic expressions
inductive arith_expr : Type
| lit_arith_expr (n : nat)
| var_arith_expr (v : var nat)
| add_arith_expr (e1 e2 : arith_expr)
| mul_arith_expr (e1 e2 : arith_expr)
open arith_expr
universe u
--def arith_expr_eval : var_state nat → arith_expr → nat
def arith_expr_eval : env → arith_expr → nat
| st (lit_arith_expr n) := n
| st (var_arith_expr v) := st.nat_var_interp v
| st (add_arith_expr e1 e2) := (arith_expr_eval st e1) + (arith_expr_eval st e2)
| st (mul_arith_expr e1 e2) := (arith_expr_eval st e1) * (arith_expr_eval st e2)
-- coincrete syntax
notation `[` n `]` := lit_arith_expr n
notation `[` v `]` := var_arith_expr v
notation e1 + e2 := add_arith_expr e1 e2
notation e1 * e2 := mul_arith_expr e1 e2
-- Provide initial values/interpretation for variables of type (var nat)
instance : has_var nat := ⟨ λ (v : var nat), 0 ⟩
-- Override the value of an arithmetic variable, returning an updated env
def override_nat : env → var nat → arith_expr → env
| (env.mk bi ni) v expr :=
⟨ bi,
λ (v' : var nat),
if (var_eq v v')
then (arith_expr_eval (env.mk bi ni) expr)
else (ni v')
⟩
|
a775a8fc1b8239170a26fdd4912862827ea15d69 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /tests/lean/elab2.lean | e15119727203b35d0d660d3ab6858173208a6f76 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 293 | lean | definition foo {A B : Type*} [has_add A] (a : A) (b : B) : A :=
a
-- set_option trace.elaborator true
-- set_option trace.elaborator_detail true
set_option pp.all true
check foo 0 1
definition bla {A B : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : A) (b : B) : A :=
a₁
check bla nat.zero tt 1
check bla 0 0 tt
|
7649f329bd560af96bac6f346d7c4db8e7a082b1 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/data/list/zip.lean | 19ce67b061c94809b0cf66d9652a79b7ba15bd11 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,926 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau
-/
import data.list.big_operators
/-!
# zip & unzip
This file provides results about `list.zip_with`, `list.zip` and `list.unzip` (definitions are in
core Lean).
`zip_with f l₁ l₂` applies `f : α → β → γ` pointwise to a list `l₁ : list α` and `l₂ : list β`. It
applies, until one of the lists is exhausted. For example,
`zip_with f [0, 1, 2] [6.28, 31] = [f 0 6.28, f 1 31]`.
`zip` is `zip_with` applied to `prod.mk`. For example,
`zip [a₁, a₂] [b₁, b₂, b₃] = [(a₁, b₁), (a₂, b₂)]`.
`unzip` undoes `zip`. For example, `unzip [(a₁, b₁), (a₂, b₂)] = ([a₁, a₂], [b₁, b₂])`.
-/
universe u
open nat
namespace list
variables {α : Type u} {β γ δ : Type*}
@[simp] theorem zip_with_cons_cons (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip_with f (a :: l₁) (b :: l₂) = f a b :: zip_with f l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_cons_cons (a : α) (b : β) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip (a :: l₁) (b :: l₂) = (a, b) :: zip l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_with_nil_left (f : α → β → γ) (l) : zip_with f [] l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_with_nil_right (f : α → β → γ) (l) : zip_with f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] lemma zip_with_eq_nil_iff {f : α → β → γ} {l l'} :
zip_with f l l' = [] ↔ l = [] ∨ l' = [] :=
by { cases l; cases l'; simp }
@[simp] theorem zip_nil_left (l : list α) : zip ([] : list β) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_nil_right (l : list α) : zip l ([] : list β) = [] :=
zip_with_nil_right _ l
@[simp] theorem zip_swap : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
(zip l₁ l₂).map prod.swap = zip l₂ l₁
| [] l₂ := (zip_nil_right _).symm
| l₁ [] := by rw zip_nil_right; refl
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := by simp only [zip_cons_cons, map_cons, zip_swap l₁ l₂, prod.swap_prod_mk];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem length_zip_with (f : α → β → γ) : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
length (zip_with f l₁ l₂) = min (length l₁) (length l₂)
| [] l₂ := rfl
| l₁ [] := by simp only [length, min_zero, zip_with_nil_right]
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := by simp [length, zip_cons_cons, length_zip_with l₁ l₂, min_add_add_right]
@[simp] theorem length_zip : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
length (zip l₁ l₂) = min (length l₁) (length l₂) :=
length_zip_with _
theorem all₂_zip_with {f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (h : length l₁ = length l₂),
all₂ p (zip_with f l₁ l₂) ↔ forall₂ (λ x y, p (f x y)) l₁ l₂
| [] [] _ := by simp
| (a :: l₁) (b :: l₂) h :=
by { simp only [length_cons, add_left_inj] at h, simp [all₂_zip_with h] }
lemma lt_length_left_of_zip_with {f : α → β → γ} {i : ℕ} {l : list α} {l' : list β}
(h : i < (zip_with f l l').length) :
i < l.length :=
by { rw [length_zip_with, lt_min_iff] at h, exact h.left }
lemma lt_length_right_of_zip_with {f : α → β → γ} {i : ℕ} {l : list α} {l' : list β}
(h : i < (zip_with f l l').length) :
i < l'.length :=
by { rw [length_zip_with, lt_min_iff] at h, exact h.right }
lemma lt_length_left_of_zip {i : ℕ} {l : list α} {l' : list β} (h : i < (zip l l').length) :
i < l.length :=
lt_length_left_of_zip_with h
lemma lt_length_right_of_zip {i : ℕ} {l : list α} {l' : list β} (h : i < (zip l l').length) :
i < l'.length :=
lt_length_right_of_zip_with h
theorem zip_append : ∀ {l₁ r₁ : list α} {l₂ r₂ : list β} (h : length l₁ = length l₂),
zip (l₁ ++ r₁) (l₂ ++ r₂) = zip l₁ l₂ ++ zip r₁ r₂
| [] r₁ l₂ r₂ h := by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h.symm]; refl
| l₁ r₁ [] r₂ h := by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h]; refl
| (a::l₁) r₁ (b::l₂) r₂ h := by simp only [cons_append, zip_cons_cons, zip_append (succ.inj h)];
split; refl
theorem zip_map (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
zip (l₁.map f) (l₂.map g) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (prod.map f g)
| [] l₂ := rfl
| l₁ [] := by simp only [map, zip_nil_right]
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := by simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map l₁ l₂, prod.map]; split; refl
theorem zip_map_left (f : α → γ) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip (l₁.map f) l₂ = (zip l₁ l₂).map (prod.map f id) :=
by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
theorem zip_map_right (f : β → γ) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
zip l₁ (l₂.map f) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (prod.map id f) :=
by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
@[simp] lemma zip_with_map {μ}
(f : γ → δ → μ) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) (as : list α) (bs : list β) :
zip_with f (as.map g) (bs.map h) =
zip_with (λ a b, f (g a) (h b)) as bs :=
begin
induction as generalizing bs,
{ simp },
{ cases bs; simp * }
end
lemma zip_with_map_left
(f : α → β → γ) (g : δ → α) (l : list δ) (l' : list β) :
zip_with f (l.map g) l' = zip_with (f ∘ g) l l' :=
by { convert (zip_with_map f g id l l'), exact eq.symm (list.map_id _) }
lemma zip_with_map_right
(f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) (g : δ → β) (l' : list δ) :
zip_with f l (l'.map g) = zip_with (λ x, f x ∘ g) l l' :=
by { convert (list.zip_with_map f id g l l'), exact eq.symm (list.map_id _) }
theorem zip_map' (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) : ∀ (l : list α),
zip (l.map f) (l.map g) = l.map (λ a, (f a, g a))
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map' l]; split; refl
lemma map_zip_with {δ : Type*} (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ → α) (l : list γ) (l' : list δ) :
map f (zip_with g l l') = zip_with (λ x y, f (g x y)) l l' :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ cases l',
{ simp },
{ simp [hl] } }
end
theorem mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β},
(a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
| (_::l₁) (_::l₂) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨or.inl rfl, or.inl rfl⟩
| (a'::l₁) (b'::l₂) (or.inr h) := by split; simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_true, mem_zip h]
theorem map_fst_zip : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
l₁.length ≤ l₂.length →
map prod.fst (zip l₁ l₂) = l₁
| [] bs _ := rfl
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) h := by { simp at h, simp! * }
| (a :: as) [] h := by { simp at h, contradiction }
theorem map_snd_zip : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β),
l₂.length ≤ l₁.length →
map prod.snd (zip l₁ l₂) = l₂
| _ [] _ := by { rw zip_nil_right, refl }
| [] (b :: bs) h := by { simp at h, contradiction }
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) h := by { simp at h, simp! * }
@[simp] theorem unzip_nil : unzip (@nil (α × β)) = ([], []) := rfl
@[simp] theorem unzip_cons (a : α) (b : β) (l : list (α × β)) :
unzip ((a, b) :: l) = (a :: (unzip l).1, b :: (unzip l).2) :=
by rw unzip; cases unzip l; refl
theorem unzip_eq_map : ∀ (l : list (α × β)), unzip l = (l.map prod.fst, l.map prod.snd)
| [] := rfl
| ((a, b) :: l) := by simp only [unzip_cons, map_cons, unzip_eq_map l]
theorem unzip_left (l : list (α × β)) : (unzip l).1 = l.map prod.fst :=
by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
theorem unzip_right (l : list (α × β)) : (unzip l).2 = l.map prod.snd :=
by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
theorem unzip_swap (l : list (α × β)) : unzip (l.map prod.swap) = (unzip l).swap :=
by simp only [unzip_eq_map, map_map]; split; refl
theorem zip_unzip : ∀ (l : list (α × β)), zip (unzip l).1 (unzip l).2 = l
| [] := rfl
| ((a, b) :: l) := by simp only [unzip_cons, zip_cons_cons, zip_unzip l]; split; refl
theorem unzip_zip_left : ∀ {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β}, length l₁ ≤ length l₂ →
(unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).1 = l₁
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| l₁ [] h := by rw eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h); refl
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) h := by simp only [zip_cons_cons, unzip_cons,
unzip_zip_left (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]; split; refl
theorem unzip_zip_right {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
(unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).2 = l₂ :=
by rw [← zip_swap, unzip_swap]; exact unzip_zip_left h
theorem unzip_zip {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} (h : length l₁ = length l₂) :
unzip (zip l₁ l₂) = (l₁, l₂) :=
by rw [← @prod.mk.eta _ _ (unzip (zip l₁ l₂)),
unzip_zip_left (le_of_eq h), unzip_zip_right (ge_of_eq h)]
lemma zip_of_prod {l : list α} {l' : list β} {lp : list (α × β)}
(hl : lp.map prod.fst = l) (hr : lp.map prod.snd = l') :
lp = l.zip l' :=
by rw [←hl, ←hr, ←zip_unzip lp, ←unzip_left, ←unzip_right, zip_unzip, zip_unzip]
lemma map_prod_left_eq_zip {l : list α} (f : α → β) : l.map (λ x, (x, f x)) = l.zip (l.map f) :=
by { rw ←zip_map', congr, exact map_id _ }
lemma map_prod_right_eq_zip {l : list α} (f : α → β) : l.map (λ x, (f x, x)) = (l.map f).zip l :=
by { rw ←zip_map', congr, exact map_id _ }
lemma zip_with_comm (f : α → α → β) (comm : ∀ (x y : α), f x y = f y x)
(l l' : list α) :
zip_with f l l' = zip_with f l' l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ cases l',
{ simp },
{ simp [comm, hl] } }
end
instance (f : α → α → β) [is_symm_op α β f] : is_symm_op (list α) (list β) (zip_with f) :=
⟨zip_with_comm f is_symm_op.symm_op⟩
@[simp] theorem length_revzip (l : list α) : length (revzip l) = length l :=
by simp only [revzip, length_zip, length_reverse, min_self]
@[simp] theorem unzip_revzip (l : list α) : (revzip l).unzip = (l, l.reverse) :=
unzip_zip (length_reverse l).symm
@[simp] theorem revzip_map_fst (l : list α) : (revzip l).map prod.fst = l :=
by rw [← unzip_left, unzip_revzip]
@[simp] theorem revzip_map_snd (l : list α) : (revzip l).map prod.snd = l.reverse :=
by rw [← unzip_right, unzip_revzip]
theorem reverse_revzip (l : list α) : reverse l.revzip = revzip l.reverse :=
by rw [← zip_unzip.{u u} (revzip l).reverse, unzip_eq_map]; simp; simp [revzip]
theorem revzip_swap (l : list α) : (revzip l).map prod.swap = revzip l.reverse :=
by simp [revzip]
lemma nth_zip_with (f : α → β → γ) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) (i : ℕ) :
(zip_with f l₁ l₂).nth i = ((l₁.nth i).map f).bind (λ g, (l₂.nth i).map g) :=
begin
induction l₁ generalizing l₂ i,
{ simp [zip_with, (<*>)] },
{ cases l₂; simp only [zip_with, has_seq.seq, functor.map, nth, option.map_none'],
{ cases ((l₁_hd :: l₁_tl).nth i); refl },
{ cases i; simp only [option.map_some', nth, option.some_bind', *] } }
end
lemma nth_zip_with_eq_some {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) (z : γ) (i : ℕ) :
(zip_with f l₁ l₂).nth i = some z ↔ ∃ x y, l₁.nth i = some x ∧ l₂.nth i = some y ∧ f x y = z :=
begin
induction l₁ generalizing l₂ i,
{ simp [zip_with] },
{ cases l₂; simp only [zip_with, nth, exists_false, and_false, false_and],
cases i; simp *, },
end
lemma nth_zip_eq_some (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) (z : α × β) (i : ℕ) :
(zip l₁ l₂).nth i = some z ↔ l₁.nth i = some z.1 ∧ l₂.nth i = some z.2 :=
begin
cases z,
rw [zip, nth_zip_with_eq_some], split,
{ rintro ⟨x, y, h₀, h₁, h₂⟩, cc },
{ rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩, exact ⟨_,_,h₀,h₁,rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_zip_with {f : α → β → γ} {l : list α} {l' : list β} {i : ℕ}
{h : i < (zip_with f l l').length} :
(zip_with f l l').nth_le i h =
f (l.nth_le i (lt_length_left_of_zip_with h)) (l'.nth_le i (lt_length_right_of_zip_with h)) :=
begin
rw [←option.some_inj, ←nth_le_nth, nth_zip_with_eq_some],
refine ⟨l.nth_le i (lt_length_left_of_zip_with h), l'.nth_le i (lt_length_right_of_zip_with h),
nth_le_nth _, _⟩,
simp only [←nth_le_nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_zip {l : list α} {l' : list β} {i : ℕ} {h : i < (zip l l').length} :
(zip l l').nth_le i h =
(l.nth_le i (lt_length_left_of_zip h), l'.nth_le i (lt_length_right_of_zip h)) :=
nth_le_zip_with
lemma mem_zip_inits_tails {l : list α} {init tail : list α} :
(init, tail) ∈ zip l.inits l.tails ↔ init ++ tail = l :=
begin
induction l generalizing init tail;
simp_rw [tails, inits, zip_cons_cons],
{ simp },
{ split; rw [mem_cons_iff, zip_map_left, mem_map, prod.exists],
{ rintros (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨_, _, h, rfl, rfl⟩),
{ simp },
{ simp [l_ih.mp h], }, },
{ cases init,
{ simp },
{ intro h,
right,
use [init_tl, tail],
simp * at *, }, }, },
end
lemma map_uncurry_zip_eq_zip_with
(f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) (l' : list β) :
map (function.uncurry f) (l.zip l') = zip_with f l l' :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simp },
{ simp [hl] } }
end
@[simp] lemma sum_zip_with_distrib_left {γ : Type*} [semiring γ]
(f : α → β → γ) (n : γ) (l : list α) (l' : list β) :
(l.zip_with (λ x y, n * f x y) l').sum = n * (l.zip_with f l').sum :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing f n l',
{ simp },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simp, },
{ simp [hl, mul_add] } }
end
section distrib
/-! ### Operations that can be applied before or after a `zip_with` -/
variables (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) (l' : list β) (n : ℕ)
lemma zip_with_distrib_take :
(zip_with f l l').take n = zip_with f (l.take n) (l'.take n) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l' n,
{ simp },
{ cases l',
{ simp },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simp [hl] } } }
end
lemma zip_with_distrib_drop :
(zip_with f l l').drop n = zip_with f (l.drop n) (l'.drop n) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l' n,
{ simp },
{ cases l',
{ simp },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simp [hl] } } }
end
lemma zip_with_distrib_tail :
(zip_with f l l').tail = zip_with f l.tail l'.tail :=
by simp_rw [←drop_one, zip_with_distrib_drop]
lemma zip_with_append (f : α → β → γ) (l la : list α) (l' lb : list β) (h : l.length = l'.length) :
zip_with f (l ++ la) (l' ++ lb) = zip_with f l l' ++ zip_with f la lb :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ have : l' = [] := eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (by simpa using h.symm),
simp [this], },
{ cases l',
{ simpa using h },
{ simp only [add_left_inj, length] at h,
simp [hl _ h] } }
end
lemma zip_with_distrib_reverse (h : l.length = l'.length) :
(zip_with f l l').reverse = zip_with f l.reverse l'.reverse :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simp },
{ simp only [add_left_inj, length] at h,
have : tl.reverse.length = tl'.reverse.length := by simp [h],
simp [hl _ h, zip_with_append _ _ _ _ _ this] } }
end
end distrib
section comm_monoid
variables [comm_monoid α]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zip_with_mul_prod_drop : ∀ (L L' : list α), L.prod * L'.prod =
(zip_with (*) L L').prod * (L.drop L'.length).prod * (L'.drop L.length).prod
| [] ys := by simp [@zero_le' ℕ]
| xs [] := by simp [@zero_le' ℕ]
| (x :: xs) (y :: ys) := begin
simp only [drop, length, zip_with_cons_cons, prod_cons],
rw [mul_assoc x, mul_comm xs.prod, mul_assoc y, mul_comm ys.prod,
prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zip_with_mul_prod_drop xs ys, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zip_with_of_length_eq (L L' : list α) (h : L.length = L'.length) :
L.prod * L'.prod = (zip_with (*) L L').prod :=
(prod_mul_prod_eq_prod_zip_with_mul_prod_drop L L').trans (by simp [h])
end comm_monoid
end list
|
9806e0e75cac749b7b1cf689799e077f590e62c1 | 66a6486e19b71391cc438afee5f081a4257564ec | /colimit/sequence.hlean | f1264966bf555dc796962316e856acf411f45289 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | spiceghello/Spectral | c8ccd1e32d4b6a9132ccee20fcba44b477cd0331 | 20023aa3de27c22ab9f9b4a177f5a1efdec2b19f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,263,374,078 | 1,523,349,717,000 | 1,523,349,717,000 | 92,312,239 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,495,642,470,000 | 1,495,642,470,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,455 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Egbert Rijke
-/
import ..move_to_lib types.fin types.trunc
open nat eq equiv sigma sigma.ops is_equiv is_trunc trunc prod fiber function
namespace seq_colim
definition seq_diagram [reducible] (A : ℕ → Type) : Type := Π⦃n⦄, A n → A (succ n)
structure Seq_diagram : Type :=
(carrier : ℕ → Type)
(struct : seq_diagram carrier)
definition is_equiseq [reducible] {A : ℕ → Type} (f : seq_diagram A) : Type :=
forall (n : ℕ), is_equiv (@f n)
structure Equi_seq : Type :=
(carrier : ℕ → Type)
(maps : seq_diagram carrier)
(prop : is_equiseq maps)
protected abbreviation Mk [constructor] := Seq_diagram.mk
attribute Seq_diagram.carrier [coercion]
attribute Seq_diagram.struct [coercion]
variables {A A' : ℕ → Type} (f : seq_diagram A) (f' : seq_diagram A') {n m k : ℕ}
include f
definition lrep {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) : A n → A m :=
begin
induction H with m H fs,
{ exact id },
{ exact @f m ∘ fs }
end
definition lrep_irrel_pathover {n m m' : ℕ} (H₁ : n ≤ m) (H₂ : n ≤ m') (p : m = m') (a : A n) :
lrep f H₁ a =[p] lrep f H₂ a :=
apo (λm H, lrep f H a) !is_prop.elimo
definition lrep_irrel {n m : ℕ} (H₁ H₂ : n ≤ m) (a : A n) : lrep f H₁ a = lrep f H₂ a :=
ap (λH, lrep f H a) !is_prop.elim
definition lrep_eq_transport {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (p : n = m) (a : A n) : lrep f H a = transport A p a :=
begin induction p, exact lrep_irrel f H (nat.le_refl n) a end
definition lrep_irrel2 {n m : ℕ} (H₁ H₂ : n ≤ m) (a : A n) :
lrep_irrel f (le.step H₁) (le.step H₂) a = ap (@f m) (lrep_irrel f H₁ H₂ a) :=
begin
have H₁ = H₂, from !is_prop.elim, induction this,
refine ap02 _ !is_prop_elim_self ⬝ _ ⬝ ap02 _(ap02 _ !is_prop_elim_self⁻¹),
reflexivity
end
definition lrep_eq_lrep_irrel {n m m' : ℕ} (H₁ : n ≤ m) (H₂ : n ≤ m') (a₁ a₂ : A n) (p : m = m') :
(lrep f H₁ a₁ = lrep f H₁ a₂) ≃ (lrep f H₂ a₁ = lrep f H₂ a₂) :=
equiv_apd011 (λm H, lrep f H a₁ = lrep f H a₂) (is_prop.elimo p H₁ H₂)
definition lrep_eq_lrep_irrel_natural {n m m' : ℕ} {H₁ : n ≤ m} (H₂ : n ≤ m') {a₁ a₂ : A n}
(p : m = m') (q : lrep f H₁ a₁ = lrep f H₁ a₂) :
lrep_eq_lrep_irrel f (le.step H₁) (le.step H₂) a₁ a₂ (ap succ p) (ap (@f m) q) =
ap (@f m') (lrep_eq_lrep_irrel f H₁ H₂ a₁ a₂ p q) :=
begin
esimp [lrep_eq_lrep_irrel],
symmetry,
refine fn_tro_eq_tro_fn2 _ (λa₁ a₂, ap (@f _)) q ⬝ _,
refine ap (λx, x ▸o _) (@is_prop.elim _ _ _ _),
apply is_trunc_pathover
end
definition is_equiv_lrep [constructor] [Hf : is_equiseq f] {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) :
is_equiv (lrep f H) :=
begin
induction H with m H Hlrepf,
{ apply is_equiv_id },
{ exact is_equiv_compose (@f _) (lrep f H) },
end
local attribute is_equiv_lrep [instance]
definition lrep_back [reducible] [Hf : is_equiseq f] {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) : A m → A n :=
(lrep f H)⁻¹ᶠ
section generalized_lrep
-- definition lrep_pathover_lrep0 [reducible] (k : ℕ) (a : A 0) : lrep f k a =[nat.zero_add k] lrep0 f k a :=
-- begin induction k with k p, constructor, exact pathover_ap A succ (apo f p) end
/- lreplace le_of_succ_le with this -/
definition lrep_f {n m : ℕ} (H : succ n ≤ m) (a : A n) :
lrep f H (f a) = lrep f (le_step_left H) a :=
begin
induction H with m H p,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact ap (@f m) p }
end
definition lrep_lrep {n m k : ℕ} (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m ≤ k) (a : A n) :
lrep f H2 (lrep f H1 a) = lrep f (nat.le_trans H1 H2) a :=
begin
induction H2 with k H2 p,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact ap (@f k) p }
end
-- -- this should be a squareover
-- definition lrep_lrep_succ (k l : ℕ) (a : A n) :
-- lrep_lrep f k (succ l) a = change_path (idontwanttoprovethis n l k)
-- (lrep_f f k (lrep f l a) ⬝o
-- lrep_lrep f (succ k) l a ⬝o
-- pathover_ap _ (λz, n + z) (apd (λz, lrep f z a) (succ_add l k)⁻¹ᵖ)) :=
-- begin
-- induction k with k IH,
-- { constructor},
-- { exact sorry}
-- end
definition f_lrep {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (a : A n) : f (lrep f H a) = lrep f (le.step H) a := idp
definition rep (m : ℕ) (a : A n) : A (n + m) :=
lrep f (le_add_right n m) a
definition rep0 (m : ℕ) (a : A 0) : A m :=
lrep f (zero_le m) a
definition rep_pathover_rep0 {n : ℕ} (a : A 0) : rep f n a =[nat.zero_add n] rep0 f n a :=
!lrep_irrel_pathover
-- definition old_rep (m : ℕ) (a : A n) : A (n + m) :=
-- by induction m with m y; exact a; exact f y
-- definition rep_eq_old_rep (m : ℕ) (a : A n) : rep f m a = old_rep f m a :=
-- by induction m with m p; reflexivity; exact ap (@f _) p
definition rep_f (k : ℕ) (a : A n) :
pathover A (rep f k (f a)) (succ_add n k) (rep f (succ k) a) :=
begin
induction k with k IH,
{ constructor },
{ unfold [succ_add], apply pathover_ap, exact apo f IH}
end
definition rep_rep (k l : ℕ) (a : A n) :
pathover A (rep f k (rep f l a)) (nat.add_assoc n l k) (rep f (l + k) a) :=
begin
induction k with k IH,
{ constructor},
{ apply pathover_ap, exact apo f IH}
end
variables {f f'}
definition is_trunc_fun_lrep (k : ℕ₋₂) (H : n ≤ m) (H2 : Πn, is_trunc_fun k (@f n)) :
is_trunc_fun k (lrep f H) :=
begin induction H with m H IH, apply is_trunc_fun_id, exact is_trunc_fun_compose k (H2 m) IH end
definition is_conn_fun_lrep (k : ℕ₋₂) (H : n ≤ m) (H2 : Πn, is_conn_fun k (@f n)) :
is_conn_fun k (lrep f H) :=
begin induction H with m H IH, apply is_conn_fun_id, exact is_conn_fun_compose k (H2 m) IH end
definition lrep_natural (τ : Π⦃n⦄, A n → A' n) (p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), τ (f a) = f' (τ a))
{n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (a : A n) : τ (lrep f H a) = lrep f' H (τ a) :=
begin
induction H with m H IH, reflexivity, exact p (lrep f H a) ⬝ ap (@f' m) IH
end
definition rep_natural (τ : Π⦃n⦄, A n → A' n) (p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), τ (f a) = f' (τ a))
{n : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (a : A n) : τ (rep f k a) = rep f' k (τ a) :=
lrep_natural τ p _ a
definition rep0_natural (τ : Π⦃n⦄, A n → A' n) (p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), τ (f a) = f' (τ a))
(k : ℕ) (a : A 0) : τ (rep0 f k a) = rep0 f' k (τ a) :=
lrep_natural τ p _ a
variables (f f')
end generalized_lrep
section shift
definition shift_diag [unfold_full] : seq_diagram (λn, A (succ n)) :=
λn a, f a
definition kshift_diag [unfold_full] (k : ℕ) : seq_diagram (λn, A (k + n)) :=
λn a, f a
definition kshift_diag' [unfold_full] (k : ℕ) : seq_diagram (λn, A (n + k)) :=
λn a, transport A (succ_add n k)⁻¹ (f a)
definition lrep_kshift_diag {n m k : ℕ} (H : m ≤ k) (a : A (n + m)) :
lrep (kshift_diag f n) H a = lrep f (nat.add_le_add_left2 H n) a :=
by induction H with k H p; reflexivity; exact ap (@f _) p
end shift
section constructions
omit f
definition constant_seq (X : Type) : seq_diagram (λ n, X) :=
λ n x, x
definition seq_diagram_arrow_left [unfold_full] (X : Type) : seq_diagram (λn, X → A n) :=
λn g x, f (g x)
definition seq_diagram_prod [unfold_full] : seq_diagram (λn, A n × A' n) :=
λn, prod_functor (@f n) (@f' n)
open fin
definition seq_diagram_fin [unfold_full] : seq_diagram fin :=
lift_succ2
definition id0_seq [unfold_full] (a₁ a₂ : A 0) : ℕ → Type :=
λ k, rep0 f k a₁ = rep0 f k a₂
definition id0_seq_diagram [unfold_full] (a₁ a₂ : A 0) : seq_diagram (id0_seq f a₁ a₂) :=
λ (k : ℕ) (p : rep0 f k a₁ = rep0 f k a₂), ap (@f k) p
definition id_seq [unfold_full] (n : ℕ) (a₁ a₂ : A n) : ℕ → Type :=
λ k, rep f k a₁ = rep f k a₂
definition id_seq_diagram [unfold_full] (n : ℕ) (a₁ a₂ : A n) : seq_diagram (id_seq f n a₁ a₂) :=
λ (k : ℕ) (p : rep f k a₁ = rep f k a₂), ap (@f (n + k)) p
definition trunc_diagram [unfold_full] (k : ℕ₋₂) (f : seq_diagram A) :
seq_diagram (λn, trunc k (A n)) :=
λn, trunc_functor k (@f n)
end constructions
section over
variable {A}
variable (P : Π⦃n⦄, A n → Type)
definition seq_diagram_over : Type := Π⦃n⦄ {a : A n}, P a → P (f a)
definition weakened_sequence [unfold_full] : seq_diagram_over f (λn a, A' n) :=
λn a a', f' a'
definition id0_seq_diagram_over [unfold_full] (a₀ : A 0) :
seq_diagram_over f (λn a, rep0 f n a₀ = a) :=
λn a p, ap (@f n) p
variable (g : seq_diagram_over f P)
variables {f P}
definition seq_diagram_of_over [unfold_full] {n : ℕ} (a : A n) :
seq_diagram (λk, P (rep f k a)) :=
λk p, g p
definition seq_diagram_sigma [unfold 6] : seq_diagram (λn, Σ(x : A n), P x) :=
λn v, ⟨f v.1, g v.2⟩
variables (f P)
theorem rep_f_equiv [constructor] (a : A n) (k : ℕ) :
P (lrep f (le_add_right (succ n) k) (f a)) ≃ P (lrep f (le_add_right n (succ k)) a) :=
equiv_apd011 P (rep_f f k a)
theorem rep_rep_equiv [constructor] (a : A n) (k l : ℕ) :
P (rep f (l + k) a) ≃ P (rep f k (rep f l a)) :=
(equiv_apd011 P (rep_rep f k l a))⁻¹ᵉ
end over
omit f
-- do we need to generalize this to the case where the bottom sequence consists of equivalences?
definition seq_diagram_pi {X : Type} {A : X → ℕ → Type} (g : Π⦃x n⦄, A x n → A x (succ n)) :
seq_diagram (λn, Πx, A x n) :=
λn f x, g (f x)
variables {f f'}
definition seq_diagram_over_fiber (g : Π⦃n⦄, A' n → A n)
(p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A' n), g (f' a) = f (g a)) : seq_diagram_over f (λn, fiber (@g n)) :=
λk a, fiber_functor (@f' k) (@f k) (@p k) idp
definition seq_diagram_fiber (g : Π⦃n⦄, A' n → A n) (p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A' n), g (f' a) = f (g a))
{n : ℕ} (a : A n) : seq_diagram (λk, fiber (@g (n + k)) (rep f k a)) :=
seq_diagram_of_over (seq_diagram_over_fiber g p) a
definition seq_diagram_fiber0 (g : Π⦃n⦄, A' n → A n) (p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A' n), g (f' a) = f (g a))
(a : A 0) : seq_diagram (λk, fiber (@g k) (rep0 f k a)) :=
λk, fiber_functor (@f' k) (@f k) (@p k) idp
end seq_colim
|
d1d94104d32836f495fcebaf8bbd3c497b3d9cec | 4bcaca5dc83d49803f72b7b5920b75b6e7d9de2d | /stage0/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Simp/Main.lean | 378fc6303877518372fac800b2a99c1fb3c045c7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | subfish-zhou/leanprover-zh_CN.github.io | 30b9fba9bd790720bd95764e61ae796697d2f603 | 8b2985d4a3d458ceda9361ac454c28168d920d3f | refs/heads/master | 1,689,709,967,820 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 409,962,097 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,796 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Transform
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Replace
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Util
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Clear
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.Types
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.Rewrite
namespace Lean.Meta
namespace Simp
builtin_initialize congrHypothesisExceptionId : InternalExceptionId ←
registerInternalExceptionId `congrHypothesisFailed
def throwCongrHypothesisFailed : MetaM α :=
throw <| Exception.internal congrHypothesisExceptionId
def Result.getProof (r : Result) : MetaM Expr := do
match r.proof? with
| some p => return p
| none => mkEqRefl r.expr
private def mkEqTrans (r₁ r₂ : Result) : MetaM Result := do
match r₁.proof? with
| none => return r₂
| some p₁ => match r₂.proof? with
| none => return { r₂ with proof? := r₁.proof? }
| some p₂ => return { r₂ with proof? := (← Meta.mkEqTrans p₁ p₂) }
def mkCongrFun (r : Result) (a : Expr) : MetaM Result :=
match r.proof? with
| none => return { expr := mkApp r.expr a, proof? := none }
| some h => return { expr := mkApp r.expr a, proof? := (← Meta.mkCongrFun h a) }
def mkCongr (r₁ r₂ : Result) : MetaM Result :=
let e := mkApp r₁.expr r₂.expr
match r₁.proof?, r₂.proof? with
| none, none => return { expr := e, proof? := none }
| some h, none => return { expr := e, proof? := (← Meta.mkCongrFun h r₂.expr) }
| none, some h => return { expr := e, proof? := (← Meta.mkCongrArg r₁.expr h) }
| some h₁, some h₂ => return { expr := e, proof? := (← Meta.mkCongr h₁ h₂) }
private def mkImpCongr (r₁ r₂ : Result) : MetaM Result := do
let e ← mkArrow r₁.expr r₂.expr
match r₁.proof?, r₂.proof? with
| none, none => return { expr := e, proof? := none }
| _, _ => return { expr := e, proof? := (← Meta.mkImpCongr (← r₁.getProof) (← r₂.getProof)) } -- TODO specialize if bootleneck
/-- Return true if `e` is of the form `ofNat n` where `n` is a kernel Nat literal -/
def isOfNatNatLit (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.isAppOfArity ``OfNat.ofNat 3 && e.appFn!.appArg!.isNatLit
private def reduceProj (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
match (← reduceProj? e) with
| some e => return e
| _ => return e
private def reduceProjFn? (e : Expr) : SimpM (Option Expr) := do
matchConst e.getAppFn (fun _ => pure none) fun cinfo _ => do
match (← getProjectionFnInfo? cinfo.name) with
| none => return none
| some projInfo =>
if projInfo.fromClass then
if (← read).simpLemmas.isDeclToUnfold cinfo.name then
-- We only unfold class projections when the user explicitly requested them to be unfolded.
-- Recall that `unfoldDefinition?` has support for unfolding this kind of projection.
withReducibleAndInstances <| unfoldDefinition? e
else
return none
else
-- `structure` projection
match (← unfoldDefinition? e) with
| none => pure none
| some e =>
match (← reduceProj? e.getAppFn) with
| some f => return some (mkAppN f e.getAppArgs)
| none => return none
private def reduceFVar (cfg : Config) (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
if cfg.zeta then
match (← getFVarLocalDecl e).value? with
| some v => return v
| none => return e
else
return e
private def unfold? (e : Expr) : SimpM (Option Expr) := do
let f := e.getAppFn
if !f.isConst then
return none
let fName := f.constName!
if (← isProjectionFn fName) then
return none -- should be reduced by `reduceProjFn?`
if (← read).simpLemmas.isDeclToUnfold e.getAppFn.constName! then
withDefault <| unfoldDefinition? e
else
return none
private partial def reduce (e : Expr) : SimpM Expr := withIncRecDepth do
let cfg := (← read).config
if cfg.beta then
let e' := e.headBeta
if e' != e then
return (← reduce e')
-- TODO: eta reduction
if cfg.proj then
match (← reduceProjFn? e) with
| some e => return (← reduce e)
| none => pure ()
if cfg.iota then
match (← reduceRecMatcher? e) with
| some e => return (← reduce e)
| none => pure ()
match (← unfold? e) with
| some e => reduce e
| none => return e
private partial def dsimp (e : Expr) : M Expr := do
transform e (post := fun e => return TransformStep.done (← reduce e))
partial def simp (e : Expr) : M Result := withIncRecDepth do
let cfg ← getConfig
if (← isProof e) then
return { expr := e }
if cfg.memoize then
if let some result := (← get).cache.find? e then
return result
simpLoop { expr := e }
where
simpLoop (r : Result) : M Result := do
let cfg ← getConfig
if (← get).numSteps > cfg.maxSteps then
throwError "simp failed, maximum number of steps exceeded"
else
let init := r.expr
modify fun s => { s with numSteps := s.numSteps + 1 }
match (← pre r.expr) with
| Step.done r => cacheResult cfg r
| Step.visit r' =>
let r ← mkEqTrans r r'
let r ← mkEqTrans r (← simpStep r.expr)
match (← post r.expr) with
| Step.done r' => cacheResult cfg (← mkEqTrans r r')
| Step.visit r' =>
let r ← mkEqTrans r r'
if cfg.singlePass || init == r.expr then
cacheResult cfg r
else
simpLoop r
simpStep (e : Expr) : M Result := do
match e with
| Expr.mdata m e _ => let r ← simp e; return { r with expr := mkMData m r.expr }
| Expr.proj .. => return { expr := (← reduceProj e) }
| Expr.app .. => simpApp e
| Expr.lam .. => simpLambda e
| Expr.forallE .. => simpForall e
| Expr.letE .. => simpLet e
| Expr.const .. => simpConst e
| Expr.bvar .. => unreachable!
| Expr.sort .. => return { expr := e }
| Expr.lit .. => simpLit e
| Expr.mvar .. => return { expr := (← instantiateMVars e) }
| Expr.fvar .. => return { expr := (← reduceFVar (← getConfig) e) }
congrDefault (e : Expr) : M Result :=
withParent e <| e.withApp fun f args => do
let infos := (← getFunInfoNArgs f args.size).paramInfo
let mut r ← simp f
let mut i := 0
for arg in args do
trace[Debug.Meta.Tactic.simp] "app [{i}] {infos.size} {arg} hasFwdDeps: {infos[i].hasFwdDeps}"
if i < infos.size && !infos[i].hasFwdDeps then
r ← mkCongr r (← simp arg)
else if (← whnfD (← inferType r.expr)).isArrow then
r ← mkCongr r (← simp arg)
else
r ← mkCongrFun r (← dsimp arg)
i := i + 1
return r
simpLit (e : Expr) : M Result :=
match e.natLit? with
| some n => return { expr := (← mkNumeral (mkConst ``Nat) n) }
| none => return { expr := e }
/- Return true iff processing the given congruence lemma hypothesis produced a non-refl proof. -/
processCongrHypothesis (h : Expr) : M Bool := do
forallTelescopeReducing (← inferType h) fun xs hType => withNewLemmas xs do
let lhs ← instantiateMVars hType.appFn!.appArg!
let r ← simp lhs
let rhs := hType.appArg!
rhs.withApp fun m zs => do
let val ← mkLambdaFVars zs r.expr
unless (← isDefEq m val) do
throwCongrHypothesisFailed
unless (← isDefEq h (← mkLambdaFVars xs (← r.getProof))) do
throwCongrHypothesisFailed
return r.proof?.isSome
/- Try to rewrite `e` children using the given congruence lemma -/
tryCongrLemma? (c : CongrLemma) (e : Expr) : M (Option Result) := withNewMCtxDepth do
trace[Debug.Meta.Tactic.simp.congr] "{c.theoremName}, {e}"
let lemma ← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels c.theoremName
let (xs, bis, type) ← forallMetaTelescopeReducing (← inferType lemma)
if c.hypothesesPos.any (· ≥ xs.size) then
return none
let lhs := type.appFn!.appArg!
let rhs := type.appArg!
if (← isDefEq lhs e) then
let mut modified := false
for i in c.hypothesesPos do
let x := xs[i]
try
if (← processCongrHypothesis x) then
modified := true
catch _ =>
trace[Meta.Tactic.simp.congr] "processCongrHypothesis {c.theoremName} failed {← inferType x}"
return none
unless modified do
trace[Meta.Tactic.simp.congr] "{c.theoremName} not modified"
return none
unless (← synthesizeArgs c.theoremName xs bis (← read).discharge?) do
trace[Meta.Tactic.simp.congr] "{c.theoremName} synthesizeArgs failed"
return none
let eNew ← instantiateMVars rhs
let proof ← instantiateMVars (mkAppN lemma xs)
return some { expr := eNew, proof? := proof }
else
return none
congr (e : Expr) : M Result := do
let f := e.getAppFn
if f.isConst then
let congrLemmas ← getCongrLemmas
let cs := congrLemmas.get f.constName!
for c in cs do
match (← tryCongrLemma? c e) with
| none => pure ()
| some r => return r
congrDefault e
else
congrDefault e
simpApp (e : Expr) : M Result := do
let e ← reduce e
if !e.isApp then
simp e
else if isOfNatNatLit e then
-- Recall that we expand "orphan" kernel nat literals `n` into `ofNat n`
return { expr := e }
else
congr e
simpConst (e : Expr) : M Result :=
return { expr := (← reduce e) }
withNewLemmas {α} (xs : Array Expr) (f : M α) : M α := do
if (← getConfig).contextual then
let mut s ← getSimpLemmas
let mut updated := false
for x in xs do
if (← isProof x) then
s ← s.add #[] x
updated := true
if updated then
withSimpLemmas s f
else
f
else
f
simpLambda (e : Expr) : M Result :=
withParent e <| lambdaTelescope e fun xs e => withNewLemmas xs do
let r ← simp e
let eNew ← mkLambdaFVars xs r.expr
match r.proof? with
| none => return { expr := eNew }
| some h =>
let p ← xs.foldrM (init := h) fun x h => do
mkFunExt (← mkLambdaFVars #[x] h)
return { expr := eNew, proof? := p }
simpArrow (e : Expr) : M Result := do
trace[Debug.Meta.Tactic.simp] "arrow {e}"
let p := e.bindingDomain!
let q := e.bindingBody!
let rp ← simp p
trace[Debug.Meta.Tactic.simp] "arrow [{(← getConfig).contextual}] {p} [{← isProp p}] -> {q} [{← isProp q}]"
if (← (← getConfig).contextual <&&> isProp p <&&> isProp q) then
trace[Debug.Meta.Tactic.simp] "ctx arrow {rp.expr} -> {q}"
withLocalDeclD e.bindingName! rp.expr fun h => do
let s ← getSimpLemmas
let s ← s.add #[] h
withSimpLemmas s do
let rq ← simp q
match rq.proof? with
| none => mkImpCongr rp rq
| some hq =>
let hq ← mkLambdaFVars #[h] hq
return { expr := (← mkArrow rp.expr rq.expr), proof? := (← mkImpCongrCtx (← rp.getProof) hq) }
else
mkImpCongr rp (← simp q)
simpForall (e : Expr) : M Result := withParent e do
trace[Debug.Meta.Tactic.simp] "forall {e}"
if e.isArrow then
simpArrow e
else if (← isProp e) then
withLocalDecl e.bindingName! e.bindingInfo! e.bindingDomain! fun x => withNewLemmas #[x] do
let b := e.bindingBody!.instantiate1 x
let rb ← simp b
let eNew ← mkForallFVars #[x] rb.expr
match rb.proof? with
| none => return { expr := eNew }
| some h => return { expr := eNew, proof? := (← mkForallCongr (← mkLambdaFVars #[x] h)) }
else
return { expr := (← dsimp e) }
simpLet (e : Expr) : M Result := do
match e with
| Expr.letE n t v b _ =>
if (← getConfig).zeta then
return { expr := b.instantiate1 v }
else
withLocalDeclD n t fun x => do
let bx := b.instantiate1 x
/- The following step is potentially very expensive when we have many nested let-decls.
TODO: handle a block of nested let decls in a single pass if this becomes a performance problem. -/
if (← isTypeCorrect bx) then
let bxType ← whnf (← inferType bx)
let rbx ← simp bx
let hb? ← match rbx.proof? with
| none => pure none
| some h => pure (some (← mkLambdaFVars #[x] h))
if (← dependsOn bxType x.fvarId!) then
/- The type of the body depends on `x`. So, we use `let_body_congr` -/
let v' ← dsimp v
let e' := mkLet n t v' (← abstract rbx.expr #[x])
match hb? with
| none => return { expr := e' }
| some h => return { expr := e', proof? := some (← mkLetBodyCongr v' h) }
else
/- The type of the body does not depend on `x`. So, we use `let_congr` -/
let rv ← simp v
let e' := mkLet n t rv.expr (← abstract rbx.expr #[x])
match rv.proof?, hb? with
| none, none => return { expr := e' }
| some h, none => return { expr := e', proof? := some (← mkLetValCongr (← mkLambdaFVars #[x] rbx.expr) h) }
| _, some h => return { expr := e', proof? := some (← mkLetCongr (← rv.getProof) h) }
else
return { expr := (← dsimp e) }
| _ => unreachable!
cacheResult (cfg : Config) (r : Result) : M Result := do
if cfg.memoize then
modify fun s => { s with cache := s.cache.insert e r }
return r
def main (e : Expr) (ctx : Context) (methods : Methods := {}) : MetaM Result := do
withReducible do
simp e methods ctx |>.run' {}
abbrev Discharge := Expr → SimpM (Option Expr)
namespace DefaultMethods
mutual
partial def discharge? (e : Expr) : SimpM (Option Expr) := do
let ctx ← read
if ctx.dischargeDepth >= ctx.config.maxDischargeDepth then
trace[Meta.Tactic.simp.discharge] "maximum discharge depth has been reached"
return none
else
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with dischargeDepth := ctx.dischargeDepth + 1 }) do
let r ← simp e methods
if r.expr.isConstOf ``True then
try
return some (← mkOfEqTrue (← r.getProof))
catch _ =>
return none
else
return none
partial def pre (e : Expr) : SimpM Step :=
preDefault e discharge?
partial def post (e : Expr) : SimpM Step :=
postDefault e discharge?
partial def methods : Methods :=
{ pre := pre, post := post, discharge? := discharge? }
end
end DefaultMethods
end Simp
def simp (e : Expr) (ctx : Simp.Context) (discharge? : Option Simp.Discharge := none) : MetaM Simp.Result := do profileitM Exception "simp" (← getOptions) do
match discharge? with
| none => Simp.main e ctx (methods := Simp.DefaultMethods.methods)
| some d => Simp.main e ctx (methods := { pre := (Simp.preDefault . d), post := (Simp.postDefault . d), discharge? := d })
/--
Auxiliary method.
Given the current `target` of `mvarId`, apply `r` which is a new target and proof that it is equaal to the current one.
-/
def applySimpResultToTarget (mvarId : MVarId) (target : Expr) (r : Simp.Result) : MetaM MVarId := do
match r.proof? with
| some proof => replaceTargetEq mvarId r.expr proof
| none =>
if target != r.expr then
replaceTargetDefEq mvarId r.expr
else
return mvarId
/-- See `simpTarget`. This method assumes `mvarId` is not assigned, and we are already using `mvarId`s local context. -/
def simpTargetCore (mvarId : MVarId) (ctx : Simp.Context) (discharge? : Option Simp.Discharge := none) : MetaM (Option MVarId) := do
let target ← instantiateMVars (← getMVarType mvarId)
let r ← simp target ctx discharge?
if r.expr.isConstOf ``True then
match r.proof? with
| some proof => assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkOfEqTrue proof)
| none => assignExprMVar mvarId (mkConst ``True.intro)
return none
else
applySimpResultToTarget mvarId target r
/--
Simplify the given goal target (aka type). Return `none` if the goal was closed. Return `some mvarId'` otherwise,
where `mvarId'` is the simplified new goal. -/
def simpTarget (mvarId : MVarId) (ctx : Simp.Context) (discharge? : Option Simp.Discharge := none) : MetaM (Option MVarId) :=
withMVarContext mvarId do
checkNotAssigned mvarId `simp
simpTargetCore mvarId ctx discharge?
/--
Simplify `prop` (which is inhabited by `proof`). Return `none` if the goal was closed. Return `some (proof', prop')`
otherwise, where `proof' : prop'` and `prop'` is the simplified `prop`.
This method assumes `mvarId` is not assigned, and we are already using `mvarId`s local context. -/
def simpStep (mvarId : MVarId) (proof : Expr) (prop : Expr) (ctx : Simp.Context) (discharge? : Option Simp.Discharge := none) : MetaM (Option (Expr × Expr)) := do
let r ← simp prop ctx discharge?
if r.expr.isConstOf ``False then
match r.proof? with
| some eqProof => assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkFalseElim (← getMVarType mvarId) (← mkEqMP eqProof proof))
| none => assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkFalseElim (← getMVarType mvarId) proof)
return none
else
match r.proof? with
| some eqProof => return some ((← mkEqMP eqProof proof), r.expr)
| none =>
if r.expr != prop then
return some ((← mkExpectedTypeHint proof r.expr), r.expr)
else
return some (proof, r.expr)
def simpLocalDecl (mvarId : MVarId) (fvarId : FVarId) (ctx : Simp.Context) (discharge? : Option Simp.Discharge := none) : MetaM (Option (FVarId × MVarId)) := do
withMVarContext mvarId do
checkNotAssigned mvarId `simp
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl fvarId
let type ← instantiateMVars localDecl.type
match (← simpStep mvarId (mkFVar fvarId) type ctx discharge?) with
| none => return none
| some (value, type') =>
if type != type' then
let mvarId ← assert mvarId localDecl.userName type' value
let mvarId ← tryClear mvarId localDecl.fvarId
let (fvarId, mvarId) ← intro1P mvarId
return some (fvarId, mvarId)
else
return some (fvarId, mvarId)
abbrev FVarIdToLemmaId := FVarIdMap Name
def simpGoal (mvarId : MVarId) (ctx : Simp.Context) (discharge? : Option Simp.Discharge := none) (simplifyTarget : Bool := true) (fvarIdsToSimp : Array FVarId := #[]) (fvarIdToLemmaId : FVarIdToLemmaId := {}) : MetaM (Option (Array FVarId × MVarId)) := do
withMVarContext mvarId do
checkNotAssigned mvarId `simp
let mut mvarId := mvarId
let mut toAssert : Array Hypothesis := #[]
for fvarId in fvarIdsToSimp do
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl fvarId
let type ← instantiateMVars localDecl.type
let ctx ← match fvarIdToLemmaId.find? localDecl.fvarId with
| none => pure ctx
| some lemmaId => pure { ctx with simpLemmas := (← ctx.simpLemmas.eraseCore lemmaId) }
match (← simpStep mvarId (mkFVar fvarId) type ctx discharge?) with
| none => return none
| some (value, type) => toAssert := toAssert.push { userName := localDecl.userName, type := type, value := value }
if simplifyTarget then
match (← simpTarget mvarId ctx discharge?) with
| none => return none
| some mvarIdNew => mvarId := mvarIdNew
let (fvarIdsNew, mvarIdNew) ← assertHypotheses mvarId toAssert
let mvarIdNew ← tryClearMany mvarIdNew fvarIdsToSimp
return (fvarIdsNew, mvarIdNew)
end Lean.Meta
|
96e92d657bcfc6139f252d733e538278afaa84f7 | 1b8f093752ba748c5ca0083afef2959aaa7dace5 | /src/category_theory/limits/default.lean | 6e80e58458da2f18e73c550b8ffd8880f4f2c163 | [] | no_license | khoek/lean-category-theory | 7ec4cda9cc64a5a4ffeb84712ac7d020dbbba386 | 63dcb598e9270a3e8b56d1769eb4f825a177cd95 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,251,725,759 | 1,539,344,445,000 | 1,539,344,445,000 | 145,281,070 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,534,662,376,000 | 1,534,662,376,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 240 | lean | import category_theory.limits.limits
import category_theory.limits.terminal
import category_theory.limits.binary_products
import category_theory.limits.products
import category_theory.limits.equalizers
import category_theory.limits.squares
|
476a19f325a55b32e1019b12bf4d39963f907cc8 | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /src/data/nat/parity.lean | 52f5df61c8e61cb18bb5834654aabd2bd3a241a3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,443 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
The `even` and `odd` predicates on the natural numbers.
-/
import data.nat.modeq
namespace nat
@[simp] theorem mod_two_ne_one {n : ℕ} : ¬ n % 2 = 1 ↔ n % 2 = 0 :=
by cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h h; simp [h]
@[simp] theorem mod_two_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : ¬ n % 2 = 0 ↔ n % 2 = 1 :=
by cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h h; simp [h]
theorem even_iff {n : ℕ} : even n ↔ n % 2 = 0 :=
⟨λ ⟨m, hm⟩, by simp [hm], λ h, ⟨n / 2, (mod_add_div n 2).symm.trans (by simp [h])⟩⟩
theorem odd_iff {n : ℕ} : odd n ↔ n % 2 = 1 :=
⟨λ ⟨m, hm⟩, by { rw [hm, add_mod], norm_num },
λ h, ⟨n / 2, (mod_add_div n 2).symm.trans (by { rw h, abel })⟩⟩
lemma not_even_iff {n : ℕ} : ¬ even n ↔ n % 2 = 1 :=
by rw [even_iff, mod_two_ne_zero]
@[simp] lemma odd_iff_not_even {n : ℕ} : odd n ↔ ¬ even n :=
by rw [not_even_iff, odd_iff]
instance : decidable_pred (even : ℕ → Prop) :=
λ n, decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by apply_instance) even_iff.symm
instance decidable_pred_odd : decidable_pred (odd : ℕ → Prop) :=
λ n, decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by apply_instance) odd_iff_not_even.symm
mk_simp_attribute parity_simps "Simp attribute for lemmas about `even`"
@[simp] theorem even_zero : even 0 := ⟨0, dec_trivial⟩
@[simp] theorem not_even_one : ¬ even 1 :=
by rw even_iff; apply one_ne_zero
@[simp] theorem even_bit0 (n : ℕ) : even (bit0 n) :=
⟨n, by rw [bit0, two_mul]⟩
@[parity_simps] theorem even_add {m n : ℕ} : even (m + n) ↔ (even m ↔ even n) :=
begin
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one m with h₁ h₁; cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h₂ h₂;
simp [even_iff, h₁, h₂],
{ exact @modeq.modeq_add _ _ 0 _ 0 h₁ h₂ },
{ exact @modeq.modeq_add _ _ 0 _ 1 h₁ h₂ },
{ exact @modeq.modeq_add _ _ 1 _ 0 h₁ h₂ },
exact @modeq.modeq_add _ _ 1 _ 1 h₁ h₂
end
theorem even.add {m n : ℕ} (hm : even m) (hn : even n) : even (m + n) :=
even_add.2 $ by simp only [*]
@[simp] theorem not_even_bit1 (n : ℕ) : ¬ even (bit1 n) :=
by simp [bit1] with parity_simps
lemma two_not_dvd_two_mul_add_one (a : ℕ) : ¬(2 ∣ 2 * a + 1) :=
begin
convert not_even_bit1 a,
exact two_mul a,
end
lemma two_not_dvd_two_mul_sub_one : Π {a : ℕ} (w : 0 < a), ¬(2 ∣ 2 * a - 1)
| (a+1) _ := two_not_dvd_two_mul_add_one a
@[parity_simps] theorem even_sub {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : even (m - n) ↔ (even m ↔ even n) :=
begin
conv { to_rhs, rw [←nat.sub_add_cancel h, even_add] },
by_cases h : even n; simp [h]
end
theorem even.sub {m n : ℕ} (hm : even m) (hn : even n) : even (m - n) :=
(le_total n m).elim
(λ h, by simp only [even_sub h, *])
(λ h, by simp only [sub_eq_zero_of_le h, even_zero])
@[parity_simps] theorem even_succ {n : ℕ} : even (succ n) ↔ ¬ even n :=
by rw [succ_eq_add_one, even_add]; simp [not_even_one]
@[parity_simps] theorem even_mul {m n : ℕ} : even (m * n) ↔ even m ∨ even n :=
begin
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one m with h₁ h₁; cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h₂ h₂;
simp [even_iff, h₁, h₂],
{ exact @modeq.modeq_mul _ _ 0 _ 0 h₁ h₂ },
{ exact @modeq.modeq_mul _ _ 0 _ 1 h₁ h₂ },
{ exact @modeq.modeq_mul _ _ 1 _ 0 h₁ h₂ },
exact @modeq.modeq_mul _ _ 1 _ 1 h₁ h₂
end
/-- If `m` and `n` are natural numbers, then the natural number `m^n` is even
if and only if `m` is even and `n` is positive. -/
@[parity_simps] theorem even_pow {m n : ℕ} : even (m^n) ↔ even m ∧ n ≠ 0 :=
by { induction n with n ih; simp [*, pow_succ', even_mul], tauto }
lemma even_div {a b : ℕ} : even (a / b) ↔ a % (2 * b) / b = 0 :=
by rw [even_iff_two_dvd, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, nat.div_mod_eq_mod_mul_div, mul_comm]
theorem neg_one_pow_eq_one_iff_even {α : Type*} [ring α] {n : ℕ} (h1 : (-1 : α) ≠ 1):
(-1 : α) ^ n = 1 ↔ even n :=
⟨λ h, n.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one.elim (dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).2
(λ hn, by rw [neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two, hn, pow_one] at h; exact (h1 h).elim),
λ ⟨m, hm⟩, by rw [neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two, hm]; simp⟩
-- Here are examples of how `parity_simps` can be used with `nat`.
example (m n : ℕ) (h : even m) : ¬ even (n + 3) ↔ even (m^2 + m + n) :=
by simp [*, (dec_trivial : ¬ 2 = 0)] with parity_simps
example : ¬ even 25394535 :=
by simp
end nat
|
69b7e2c5b3e2bc8114f7db6d3decb9219abb9575 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/bug1.lean | 55bb23ab289c6ac562a3d4a04d1fa543f7b0d17a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 648 | lean | prelude definition bool : Type := Sort 0
definition and (p q : bool) : bool := ∀ c : bool, (p → q → c) → c
infixl ` ∧ `:25 := and
constant a : bool
-- Error
theorem and_intro1 (p q : bool) (H1 : p) (H2 : q) : a
:= fun (c : bool) (H : p -> q -> c), H H1 H2
-- Error
theorem and_intro2 (p q : bool) (H1 : p) (H2 : q) : p ∧ p
:= fun (c : bool) (H : p -> q -> c), H H1 H2
-- Error
theorem and_intro3 (p q : bool) (H1 : p) (H2 : q) : q ∧ p
:= fun (c : bool) (H : p -> q -> c), H H1 H2
-- Correct
theorem and_intro4 (p q : bool) (H1 : p) (H2 : q) : p ∧ q
:= fun (c : bool) (H : p -> q -> c), H H1 H2
#check and_intro4
|
7fb3b24b6ccfbc6dd18aedd63c6066c3ddbdf32b | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/analysis/normed_space/mazur_ulam.lean | 27425dc10633ddfa913b303593541d3b08617868 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,269 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.normed_space.point_reflection
import topology.instances.real_vector_space
import analysis.normed_space.add_torsor
import linear_algebra.affine_space
/-!
# Mazur-Ulam Theorem
Mazur-Ulam theorem states that an isometric bijection between two normed spaces over `ℝ` is affine.
We formalize it in two definitions:
* `isometric.to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero` : given `E ≃ᵢ F` sending `0` to `0`,
returns `E ≃L[ℝ] F` with the same `to_fun` and `inv_fun`;
* `isometric.to_real_linear_equiv` : given `f : E ≃ᵢ F`,
returns `g : E ≃L[ℝ] F` with `g x = f x - f 0`.
* `isometric.to_affine_map` : given `PE ≃ᵢ PF`, returns `g : affine_map ℝ E PE F PF` with the same
`to_fun`.
The formalization is based on [Jussi Väisälä, *A Proof of the Mazur-Ulam Theorem*][Vaisala_2003].
## TODO
Once we have affine equivalences, upgrade `isometric.to_affine_map` to `isometric.to_affine_equiv`.
## Tags
isometry, affine map, linear map
-/
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F]
open set
noncomputable theory
namespace isometric
/-- If an isometric self-homeomorphism of a normed vector space over `ℝ` fixes `x` and `y`,
then it fixes the midpoint of `[x, y]`. This is a lemma for a more general Mazur-Ulam theorem,
see below. -/
lemma midpoint_fixed {x y : E} :
∀ e : E ≃ᵢ E, e x = x → e y = y → e (midpoint ℝ x y) = midpoint ℝ x y :=
begin
set z := midpoint ℝ x y,
-- Consider the set of `e : E ≃ᵢ E` such that `e x = x` and `e y = y`
set s := { e : E ≃ᵢ E | e x = x ∧ e y = y },
haveI : nonempty s := ⟨⟨isometric.refl E, rfl, rfl⟩⟩,
-- On the one hand, `e` cannot send the midpoint `z` of `[x, y]` too far
have h_bdd : bdd_above (range $ λ e : s, dist (e z) z),
{ refine ⟨dist x z + dist x z, forall_range_iff.2 $ subtype.forall.2 _⟩,
rintro e ⟨hx, hy⟩,
calc dist (e z) z ≤ dist (e z) x + dist x z : dist_triangle (e z) x z
... = dist (e x) (e z) + dist x z : by rw [hx, dist_comm]
... = dist x z + dist x z : by erw [e.dist_eq x z] },
-- On the other hand, consider the map `f : (E ≃ᵢ E) → (E ≃ᵢ E)`
-- sending each `e` to `R ∘ e⁻¹ ∘ R ∘ e`, where `R` is the point reflection in the
-- midpoint `z` of `[x, y]`.
set R : E ≃ᵢ E := point_reflection z,
set f : (E ≃ᵢ E) → (E ≃ᵢ E) := λ e, ((e.trans R).trans e.symm).trans R,
-- Note that `f` doubles the value of ``dist (e z) z`
have hf_dist : ∀ e, dist (f e z) z = 2 * dist (e z) z,
{ intro e,
dsimp [f],
rw [point_reflection_dist_fixed, ← e.dist_eq, e.apply_symm_apply,
point_reflection_dist_self_real, dist_comm] },
-- Also note that `f` maps `s` to itself
have hf_maps_to : maps_to f s s,
{ rintros e ⟨hx, hy⟩,
split; simp [hx, hy, e.symm_apply_eq.2 hx.symm, e.symm_apply_eq.2 hy.symm] },
-- Therefore, `dist (e z) z = 0` for all `e ∈ s`.
set c := ⨆ e : s, dist (e z) z,
have : c ≤ c / 2,
{ apply csupr_le,
rintros ⟨e, he⟩,
simp only [coe_fn_coe_base, subtype.coe_mk, le_div_iff' (@zero_lt_two ℝ _), ← hf_dist],
exact le_csupr h_bdd ⟨f e, hf_maps_to he⟩ },
replace : c ≤ 0, { linarith },
refine λ e hx hy, dist_le_zero.1 (le_trans _ this),
exact le_csupr h_bdd ⟨e, hx, hy⟩
end
/-- A bijective isometry sends midpoints to midpoints. -/
lemma map_midpoint (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (x y : E) : f (midpoint ℝ x y) = midpoint ℝ (f x) (f y) :=
begin
set e : E ≃ᵢ E := ((f.trans $ point_reflection $ midpoint ℝ (f x) (f y)).trans f.symm).trans
(point_reflection $ midpoint ℝ x y),
have hx : e x = x, by simp,
have hy : e y = y, by simp,
have hm := e.midpoint_fixed hx hy,
simp only [e, trans_apply] at hm,
rwa [← eq_symm_apply, point_reflection_symm, point_reflection_self, symm_apply_eq,
point_reflection_fixed_iff ℝ] at hm,
apply_instance
end
/-!
Since `f : E ≃ᵢ F` sends midpoints to midpoints, it is an affine map.
We have no predicate `is_affine_map` in `mathlib`, so we convert `f` to a linear map.
If `f 0 = 0`, then we proceed as is, otherwise we use `f - f 0`.
-/
/-- Mazur-Ulam Theorem: if `f` is an isometric bijection between two normed vector spaces
over `ℝ` and `f 0 = 0`, then `f` is a linear equivalence. -/
def to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (h0 : f 0 = 0) :
E ≃L[ℝ] F :=
{ .. (add_monoid_hom.of_map_midpoint ℝ ℝ f h0 f.map_midpoint).to_real_linear_map f.continuous,
.. f.to_homeomorph }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (h0 : f 0 = 0) :
⇑(f.to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero h0) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero_symm (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (h0 : f 0 = 0) :
⇑(f.to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero h0).symm = f.symm := rfl
/-- Mazur-Ulam Theorem: if `f` is an isometric bijection between two normed vector spaces
over `ℝ`, then `x ↦ f x - f 0` is a linear equivalence. -/
def to_real_linear_equiv (f : E ≃ᵢ F) : E ≃L[ℝ] F :=
(f.trans (isometric.add_right (f 0)).symm).to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero (sub_self $ f 0)
@[simp] lemma to_real_linear_equiv_apply (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (x : E) :
(f.to_real_linear_equiv : E → F) x = f x - f 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_real_linear_equiv_symm_apply (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (y : F) :
(f.to_real_linear_equiv.symm : F → E) y = f.symm (y + f 0) := rfl
variables (E F) {PE : Type*} {PF : Type*} [metric_space PE] [normed_add_torsor E PE]
[metric_space PF] [normed_add_torsor F PF]
/-- Convert an isometric equivalence between two affine spaces to an `affine_map`. -/
def to_affine_map (f : PE ≃ᵢ PF) : affine_map ℝ E PE F PF :=
affine_map.mk' f
(((vadd_const E (classical.choice $ add_torsor.nonempty E : PE)).trans $ f.trans
(vadd_const F (f $ classical.choice $ add_torsor.nonempty E : PF)).symm).to_real_linear_equiv)
(classical.choice $ add_torsor.nonempty E) $ λ p',
by simp
@[simp] lemma coe_to_affine_map (f : PE ≃ᵢ PF) : ⇑(f.to_affine_map E F) = f := rfl
end isometric
|
e60585b506432bed4bedb7028b2b07971d00d025 | 491068d2ad28831e7dade8d6dff871c3e49d9431 | /hott/hit/refl_quotient.hlean | bc4e4678437dbf06c99399f38001bbc6d11e6d01 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | davidmueller13/lean | 65a3ed141b4088cd0a268e4de80eb6778b21a0e9 | c626e2e3c6f3771e07c32e82ee5b9e030de5b050 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,278,313,401 | 1,444,021,177,000 | 1,444,021,177,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,408 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
Quotient of a reflexive relation
-/
import homotopy.circle cubical.squareover .two_quotient
open eq simple_two_quotient e_closure
namespace refl_quotient
section
parameters {A : Type} (R : A → A → Type) (ρ : Πa, R a a)
inductive refl_quotient_Q : Π⦃a : A⦄, e_closure R a a → Type :=
| Qmk {} : Π(a : A), refl_quotient_Q [ρ a]
open refl_quotient_Q
local abbreviation Q := refl_quotient_Q
definition refl_quotient : Type := simple_two_quotient R Q -- TODO: define this in root namespace
definition rclass_of (a : A) : refl_quotient := incl0 R Q a
definition req_of_rel ⦃a a' : A⦄ (r : R a a') : rclass_of a = rclass_of a' :=
incl1 R Q r
definition pρ (a : A) : req_of_rel (ρ a) = idp :=
incl2 R Q (Qmk a)
-- protected definition rec {P : refl_quotient → Type}
-- (Pc : Π(a : A), P (rclass_of a))
-- (Pp : Π⦃a a' : A⦄ (H : R a a'), Pc a =[req_of_rel H] Pc a')
-- (Pr : Π(a : A), Pp (ρ a) =[pρ a] idpo)
-- (x : refl_quotient) : P x :=
-- sorry
-- protected definition rec_on [reducible] {P : refl_quotient → Type}
-- (Pc : Π(a : A), P (rclass_of a))
-- (Pp : Π⦃a a' : A⦄ (H : R a a'), Pc a =[req_of_rel H] Pc a')
-- (Pr : Π(a : A), Pp (ρ a) =[pρ a] idpo) : P y :=
-- rec Pinl Pinr Pglue y
-- definition rec_req_of_rel {P : Type} {P : refl_quotient → Type}
-- (Pc : Π(a : A), P (rclass_of a))
-- (Pp : Π⦃a a' : A⦄ (H : R a a'), Pc a =[req_of_rel H] Pc a')
-- (Pr : Π(a : A), Pp (ρ a) =[pρ a] idpo)
-- ⦃a a' : A⦄ (r : R a a') : apdo (rec Pc Pp Pr) (req_of_rel r) = Pp r :=
-- !rec_incl1
-- theorem rec_pρ {P : Type} {P : refl_quotient → Type}
-- (Pc : Π(a : A), P (rclass_of a))
-- (Pp : Π⦃a a' : A⦄ (H : R a a'), Pc a =[req_of_rel H] Pc a')
-- (Pr : Π(a : A), Pp (ρ a) =[pρ a] idpo) (a : A)
-- : square (ap02 (rec Pc Pp Pr) (pρ a)) (Pr a) (elim_req_of_rel Pr (ρ a)) idp :=
-- !rec_incl2
protected definition elim {P : Type} (Pc : Π(a : A), P)
(Pp : Π⦃a a' : A⦄ (H : R a a'), Pc a = Pc a') (Pr : Π(a : A), Pp (ρ a) = idp)
(x : refl_quotient) : P :=
begin
induction x,
exact Pc a,
exact Pp s,
induction q, apply Pr
end
protected definition elim_on [reducible] {P : Type} (x : refl_quotient) (Pc : Π(a : A), P)
(Pp : Π⦃a a' : A⦄ (H : R a a'), Pc a = Pc a') (Pr : Π(a : A), Pp (ρ a) = idp) : P :=
elim Pc Pp Pr x
definition elim_req_of_rel {P : Type} {Pc : Π(a : A), P}
{Pp : Π⦃a a' : A⦄ (H : R a a'), Pc a = Pc a'} (Pr : Π(a : A), Pp (ρ a) = idp)
⦃a a' : A⦄ (r : R a a') : ap (elim Pc Pp Pr) (req_of_rel r) = Pp r :=
!elim_incl1
theorem elim_pρ {P : Type} (Pc : Π(a : A), P)
(Pp : Π⦃a a' : A⦄ (H : R a a'), Pc a = Pc a') (Pr : Π(a : A), Pp (ρ a) = idp) (a : A)
: square (ap02 (elim Pc Pp Pr) (pρ a)) (Pr a) (elim_req_of_rel Pr (ρ a)) idp :=
!elim_incl2
end
end refl_quotient
attribute refl_quotient.rclass_of [constructor]
attribute /-refl_quotient.rec-/ refl_quotient.elim [unfold 8] [recursor 8]
--attribute refl_quotient.elim_type [unfold 9]
attribute /-refl_quotient.rec_on-/ refl_quotient.elim_on [unfold 5]
--attribute refl_quotient.elim_type_on [unfold 6]
|
96ba4123ea47fc0c940bc73b10d8c8627da3232d | a3db153d66921f9d5a199b60b52ab3c21cf0e023 | /src/exercises.lean | d4d87281592e7311abe8376605897d3482e4ee3a | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | metalogical/sia-lean | 3bd87a76b3ee6d910cbf182eb2a0e6d9eca3c056 | f8e354dd2ff6c09c4e001c1f80f6112c62da8592 | refs/heads/master | 1,629,775,811,523 | 1,512,684,874,000 | 1,512,684,874,000 | 106,763,566 | 4 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,876 | lean | import .basic
section
parameters {R : Type} [sia R]
open st_order
open st_ordered_field
open sia
@[reducible] private def Delta := Delta R
@[reducible] private def DeltaT := subtype Delta
section -- 1.1
variable (a: R)
example : 0 < a -> 0 != a :=
assume a_pos,
assume a_zero_bad: 0 = a,
lt_irrefl (0: R) (calc
0 < a : a_pos
... = 0 : by rw a_zero_bad
)
example : 0 < a <-> -a < 0 :=
have forwards : 0 < a -> -a < 0, from (
assume a_pos,
calc
-a < -0 : lt_neg_flip a_pos
... = 0 : neg_zero
),
have backwards : -a < 0 -> 0 < a, from (
assume neg_a_neg,
calc
0 = -0 : by rw neg_zero
... < -(-a) : lt_neg_flip neg_a_neg
... = a : by rw neg_neg
),
iff.intro forwards backwards
example : 0 < (1: R) + 1 := calc
0 < 1 : lt_zero_one R
... = 1 + 0 : eq.symm (add_zero 1)
... < (1 + 1 : R) : lt_add_left (lt_zero_one R) 1
example : a < 0 \/ 0 < a -> 0 < a * a :=
assume either_lt_0_a,
have left: a < 0 -> 0 < a * a, from (
assume a_neg,
have neg_a_pos: 0 < -a, from (calc
0 = -0 : by rw neg_zero
... < -a : lt_neg_flip a_neg
), calc
0 = -a * 0 : by rw mul_zero
... < -a * -a : lt_mul_pos_left neg_a_pos neg_a_pos
... = a * a : by rw neg_mul_neg
),
have right: 0 < a -> 0 < a * a, from (
assume a_pos,
calc
0 = a * 0 : by rw (mul_zero a)
... < a * a : lt_mul_pos_left a_pos a_pos
),
or.elim either_lt_0_a left right
end
-- 1.2 in basic.lean
example : forall {a b: R}, not (a < b) -> forall x: R, not (set.mem x [a ... b]) := -- 1.3; i.e. [a ... b] is empty
assume a b,
assume not_a_lt_b,
assume x,
assume bad_elem,
have bad: a < x /\ x < b, from bad_elem,
not_a_lt_b (lt_trans (and.elim_left bad) (and.elim_right bad))
-- 1.4 in basic.lean
section --1.5
@[reducible]
def convex_comb (x y : R) (t : subtype [[(0: R) ... 1]]) := t.val * y + (1 - t.val) * x
example : forall a b : R, forall x y : subtype [[a ... b]], forall t : subtype [[0 ... 1]],
a <= convex_comb x.val y.val t /\ convex_comb x.val y.val t <= b :=
assume a b,
assume x y,
assume t,
have t_nonneg: 0 <= t.val, from and.elim_left t.property,
have t.val <= 1, from and.elim_right t.property,
have t_nonneg': 0 <= (1 - t.val), from (calc
0 = 1 + -1 : by rw add_neg_self
... <= 1 + - t.val : le_add_left (le_neg_flip this)
... = 1 - t.val : by rw <-sub_eq_add_neg
),
have left: a <= convex_comb x.val y.val t, from
have x_ineq: a <= x.val, from and.elim_left x.property,
have y_ineq: a <= y.val, from and.elim_left y.property,
(calc
a = 1 * a + (- (t.val * a) + t.val * a) : by rw [<-add_comm (t.val * a) _, <-sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self, add_zero, one_mul]
... = 1 * a + -(t.val) * a + t.val * a : by rw [add_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
... = (1 - t.val) * a + t.val * a : by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, <-right_distrib]
... <= (1 - t.val) * a + t.val * y.val : le_add_left (le_mul_pos_left y_ineq t_nonneg)
... = t.val * y.val + (1 - t.val) * a : by rw add_comm
... <= t.val * y.val + (1 - t.val) * x.val : le_add_left (le_mul_pos_left x_ineq t_nonneg')
),
have right: convex_comb x.val y.val t <= b, from
have x_ineq: x.val <= b, from and.elim_right x.property,
have y_ineq: y.val <= b, from and.elim_right y.property,
(calc
t.val * y.val + (1 - t.val) * x.val
<= t.val * y.val + (1 - t.val) * b : le_add_left (le_mul_pos_left x_ineq t_nonneg')
... = (1 - t.val) * b + t.val * y.val : by rw add_comm
... <= (1 - t.val) * b + t.val * b : le_add_left (le_mul_pos_left y_ineq t_nonneg)
... = 1 * b + -(t.val) * b + t.val * b : by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, right_distrib]
... = 1 * b + (- (t.val * b) + t.val * b) : by rw [add_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
... = b - (t.val * b) + t.val * b : by rw [one_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
... = b : by rw sub_add_cancel
),
and.intro left right
end
section -- 1.6
example : forall d: subtype Delta, not (d.val < (0: R) \/ 0 < d.val) :=
assume d,
have 0 <= d.val /\ d.val <= 0, from delta_near_zero d,
not_or this.left this.right
example : forall d: subtype Delta, forall a: R, 0 < a -> 0 < a + d.val :=
assume d,
assume a,
assume a_pos,
calc
0 <= d.val : and.elim_left (delta_near_zero d)
... = d.val + 0 : by rw add_zero
... < d.val + a : lt_add_left a_pos _
... = a + d.val : by rw add_comm
end
section -- 1.7
example : forall a b : R, forall d e : subtype Delta, [[a ... b]] = [[a + d.val ... b + e.val]] :=
assume a b,
assume d e,
have set.eq [[a ... b]] [[a + d.val ... b + e.val]], from
assume x,
have forwards : set.mem x [[a ... b]] -> set.mem x [[a + d.val ... b + e.val]], from
assume x_mem,
have ge: a + d.val <= x, from
have d.val <= 0, from and.elim_right (delta_near_zero d),
calc a + d.val
<= a + 0 : by {apply le_add_left this}
... <= x : by {simp, apply and.elim_left x_mem},
have le: x <= b + e.val, from
have 0 <= e.val, from and.elim_left (delta_near_zero e),
calc
x <= b + 0 : by {simp, apply and.elim_right x_mem}
... <= b + e.val : le_add_left this,
and.intro ge le,
have backwards : set.mem x [[a + d.val ... b + e.val]] -> set.mem x [[a ... b]], from
assume x_mem,
have ge: a <= x, from
have 0 <= d.val, from and.elim_left (delta_near_zero d),
calc
a = a + 0 : by simp
... <= a + d.val : by {apply le_add_left this}
... <= x : and.elim_left x_mem,
have le: x <= b, from
have e.val <= 0, from and.elim_right (delta_near_zero e),
calc
x <= b + e.val : and.elim_right x_mem
... <= b + 0 : by {apply le_add_left this}
... = b : by simp,
and.intro ge le,
iff.intro forwards backwards,
set.ext this
end
section -- 1.8
@[reducible]
def rigid_rod : Type := DeltaT -> R
private meta def lift_funext : tactic unit := `[ intro f, intros, apply funext, intro d ]
instance rigid_rod_ring [sia R] : ring rigid_rod := {
add := fun f g, fun d, f d + g d,
zero := fun d, 0,
neg := fun f, fun d, -(f d),
mul := fun f g, fun d, f d * g d,
one := fun d, 1,
add_assoc := by {lift_funext, show _ + _ = _ + _, rw add_assoc},
add_comm := by {lift_funext, show _ + _ = _ + _, rw add_comm},
add_zero := by {lift_funext, show f d + 0 = f d, rw add_zero},
zero_add := by {lift_funext, show 0 + f d = f d, rw zero_add},
add_left_neg := by {lift_funext, show -(f d) + f d = 0, rw add_left_neg},
mul_assoc := by {lift_funext, show _ * _ = _ * _, rw mul_assoc},
one_mul := by {lift_funext, show 1 * f d = f d, rw one_mul},
mul_one := by {lift_funext, show f d * 1 = f d, rw mul_one},
left_distrib := by {lift_funext, show _ * _ = _ + _, rw left_distrib},
right_distrib := by {lift_funext, show _ * _ = _ + _, rw right_distrib},
}
instance prod_ring {T : Type} [ring T] : ring (T × T) := {
add := fun x y, (x.fst + y.fst, x.snd + y.snd),
zero := (0, 0),
neg := fun x, (-x.fst, -x.snd),
mul := fun x y, (x.fst * y.fst, x.fst * y.snd + x.snd * y.fst),
one := (1, 0),
add_assoc := by {intros, simp},
add_comm := by {intros, show (_, _) = (_, _), simp},
add_zero := by {intro x, cases x, show (_, _) = (_, _), simp},
zero_add := by {intro x, cases x, show (_, _) = (_, _), simp},
add_left_neg := by {intro x, cases x, show (_, _) = (_, _), simp},
mul_assoc := by {intros, simp [left_distrib, right_distrib]},
one_mul := by {intro x, cases x, show (_, _) = (_, _), simp},
mul_one := by {intro x, cases x, show (_, _) = (_, _), simp},
left_distrib := by {intros, simp [left_distrib]},
right_distrib := by {intros, simp [right_distrib]},
}
@[reducible]
def iso : R × R -> rigid_rod := fun ab, fun d, ab.fst + ab.snd * d.val
example : forall x y: R × R, iso (x + y) = iso x + iso y := begin
intros,
apply funext,
intro,
show (_ + _) + (_ + _) * _ = (_ + _ * _) + (_ + _ * _), -- reduce iso
simp [left_distrib]
end
example : forall x y: R × R, iso (x * y) = iso x * iso y := begin
intros,
apply funext,
intro d,
have sq_zero: d.val * d.val = 0, from d.property,
show (_ * _) + (_ + _) * _ = (_ + _ * _) * (_ + _ * _), -- reduce iso
simp [left_distrib, sq_zero],
end
example : iso 1 = (1: rigid_rod) := begin
apply funext,
intro,
show (_, _).fst + (_, _).snd * _ = (1 : R),
simp
end
end
section -- 1.9
lemma microproduct_not_zero : not (forall e n : subtype Delta, e.val * n.val = 0) :=
assume bad,
have forall d e : subtype Delta, d.val = e.val, from
assume d e,
have forall n : subtype Delta, d.val * n.val = e.val * n.val, from
assume n,
(calc
d.val * n.val = 0 : bad d n
... = e.val * n.val : eq.symm (bad e n)
),
sia.microcancellation this,
sia.delta_nondegenerate this
lemma Delta_not_microstable : not (sia.microstable Delta) :=
assume bad,
have forall a b : subtype Delta, a.val * b.val = 0, from
assume a b,
have a_nilpotent : a.val * a.val = 0, from a.property,
have b_nilpotent : b.val * b.val = 0, from b.property,
have sum_nilpotent : (a.val + b.val) * (a.val + b.val) = 0, from bad a b,
have (2 : R) != 0, from ne.symm (lt_ne (calc (0:R)
< 1 : lt_zero_one R
... = 1 + 0 : by simp
... < 1 + 1 : lt_add_left (lt_zero_one R) 1)),
(calc a.val * b.val
= (a.val * b.val) * 2 / 2 : by rw (mul_div_cancel _ this)
... = (a.val * b.val) * (1 + 1) / 2 : by refl
... = (a.val * b.val + a.val * b.val) / 2 : by rw [left_distrib, mul_one]
... = ((0 + a.val * b.val) + (a.val * b.val + 0)) / 2 : by simp
... = ((a.val * a.val + a.val * b.val) + (a.val * b.val + b.val * b.val)) / 2 : by rw [a_nilpotent, b_nilpotent]
... = ((a.val + b.val) * (a.val + b.val)) / 2 : by simp [left_distrib, right_distrib]
... = 0 / 2 : by rw [sum_nilpotent]
... = 0 : by rw [zero_div]),
microproduct_not_zero this
example : not (forall x y : R, x * x + y * y = 0 -> x * x = 0) :=
assume bad,
have sia.microstable Delta, from
assume a_sub b_sub,
let a := a_sub.val in
let a_prop : a * a = 0 := a_sub.property in
let b := b_sub.val in
let b_prop : b * b = 0 := b_sub.property in
have (a + b) * (a + b) + (a - b) * (a - b) = 0, from (calc
(a + b) * (a + b) + (a - b) * (a - b)
= (a * a + a * a + b * b + b * b) : by simp [left_distrib, right_distrib]
... = 0 : by simp [a_prop, b_prop]
),
bad (a + b) (a - b) this,
Delta_not_microstable this
end
section -- 1.10
@[reducible] def neighbors (a b : R) := Delta (a - b)
example : forall a : R, neighbors a a :=
assume a,
show (a - a) * (a - a) = 0, by rw [sub_self, zero_mul]
example : forall {a b : R}, neighbors a b -> neighbors b a :=
assume a b,
assume pf_ab,
calc (b - a) * (b - a)
= -(b - a) * -(b - a) : by rw [neg_mul_neg]
... = (a - b) * (a - b) : by simp
... = 0 : pf_ab
example : not (forall {a b c : R}, neighbors a b -> neighbors b c -> neighbors a c) :=
assume bad,
have terrible : sia.microstable Delta, from
assume d e,
have n_ab : neighbors d.val 0, from
calc (d.val - 0) * (d.val - 0)
= d.val * d.val : by simp
... = 0 : d.property,
have n_bc : neighbors 0 (-e.val), from
calc (0 - -e.val) * (0 - -e.val)
= e.val * e.val : by simp
... = 0 : e.property,
calc (d.val + e.val) * (d.val + e.val)
= (d.val - -e.val) * (d.val - -e.val) : by rw [sub_neg_eq_add]
... = 0 : bad n_ab n_bc,
Delta_not_microstable terrible
end
section -- 1.11
@[reducible] def continuous (f : R -> R) : Prop := forall x y : R, neighbors x y -> neighbors (f x) (f y)
def univ (R : Type) : Type := subtype (@set.univ R)
example : forall (f : R -> R), continuous f :=
assume f,
show continuous f, from
assume x y : R,
let d_val := x - y in
assume d_Delta : d_val * d_val = 0,
let d : DeltaT := { val := d_val, property := d_Delta } in
have forall a: R, (forall d: DeltaT, f (y + d.val) = f y + a * d.val) -> neighbors (f x) (f y), from
assume a,
assume nice,
have x = y + d.val, by simp [d_val],
have f x = f y + a * d.val, by {rw this, apply nice d},
calc (f x - f y) * (f x - f y)
= (a * a) * (d.val * d.val) : by simp [this]
... = (a * a) * 0 : by rw d_Delta
... = 0 : by rw mul_zero,
exists.elim (exists_of_exists_unique (microaffinity f y)) this
end
end
|
f4237eec07350338f43c70d73db9569d187e069a | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/topology/metric_space/lipschitz.lean | 929582fe651f431fd387c10f483552dc12e3d6ef | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,037 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import logic.function.iterate
import topology.metric_space.basic
import category_theory.endomorphism
import category_theory.types
/-!
# Lipschitz continuous functions
A map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is called *Lipschitz continuous*
with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y` we have `edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`.
There is also a version asserting this inequality only for `x` and `y` in some set `s`.
In this file we provide various ways to prove that various combinations of Lipschitz continuous
functions are Lipschitz continuous. We also prove that Lipschitz continuous functions are
uniformly continuous.
## Main definitions and lemmas
* `lipschitz_with K f`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0`
* `lipschitz_on_with K f`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0` on a set `s`
* `lipschitz_with.uniform_continuous`: a Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous
* `lipschitz_on_with.uniform_continuous_on`: a function which is Lipschitz on a set is uniformly
continuous on that set.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjuction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. Constructors whose names end with `'` take `K : ℝ` as an
argument, and return `lipschitz_with (nnreal.of_real K) f`.
-/
universes u v w x
open filter function set
open_locale topological_space nnreal ennreal
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x}
/-- A function `f` is Lipschitz continuous with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y`
we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y` -/
def lipschitz_with [emetric_space α] [emetric_space β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) :=
∀x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
lemma lipschitz_with_iff_dist_le_mul [metric_space α] [metric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} :
lipschitz_with K f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y :=
by { simp only [lipschitz_with, edist_nndist, dist_nndist], norm_cast }
alias lipschitz_with_iff_dist_le_mul ↔ lipschitz_with.dist_le_mul lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul
/-- A function `f` is Lipschitz continuous with constant `K ≥ 0` on `s` if for all `x, y` in `s`
we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y` -/
def lipschitz_on_with [emetric_space α] [emetric_space β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) (s : set α) :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ s), edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
@[simp] lemma lipschitz_on_with_empty [emetric_space α] [emetric_space β] (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) :
lipschitz_on_with K f ∅ :=
λ x x_in y y_in, false.elim x_in
lemma lipschitz_on_with.mono [emetric_space α] [emetric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0} {s t : set α} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_on_with K f t) (h : s ⊆ t) : lipschitz_on_with K f s :=
λ x x_in y y_in, hf (h x_in) (h y_in)
lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul [metric_space α] [metric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0} {s : set α}
{f : α → β} : lipschitz_on_with K f s ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y :=
by { simp only [lipschitz_on_with, edist_nndist, dist_nndist], norm_cast }
alias lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul ↔
lipschitz_on_with.dist_le_mul lipschitz_on_with.of_dist_le_mul
@[simp] lemma lipschitz_on_univ [emetric_space α] [emetric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} :
lipschitz_on_with K f univ ↔ lipschitz_with K f :=
by simp [lipschitz_on_with, lipschitz_with]
lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_restrict [emetric_space α] [emetric_space β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} {s : set α} : lipschitz_on_with K f s ↔ lipschitz_with K (s.restrict f) :=
by simp only [lipschitz_on_with, lipschitz_with, set_coe.forall', restrict, subtype.edist_eq]
namespace lipschitz_with
section emetric
variables [emetric_space α] [emetric_space β] [emetric_space γ] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
lemma edist_le_mul (h : lipschitz_with K f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y := h x y
lemma edist_lt_top (hf : lipschitz_with K f) {x y : α} (h : edist x y < ⊤) :
edist (f x) (f y) < ⊤ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (hf x y) $ ennreal.mul_lt_top ennreal.coe_lt_top h
lemma mul_edist_le (h : lipschitz_with K f) (x y : α) :
(K⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) * edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y :=
begin
have := h x y,
rw [mul_comm] at this,
replace := ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul this,
rwa [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm] at this
end
protected lemma of_edist_le (h : ∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y) :
lipschitz_with 1 f :=
λ x y, by simp only [ennreal.coe_one, one_mul, h]
protected lemma weaken (hf : lipschitz_with K f) {K' : ℝ≥0} (h : K ≤ K') :
lipschitz_with K' f :=
assume x y, le_trans (hf x y) $ ennreal.mul_right_mono (ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 h)
lemma ediam_image_le (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (s : set α) :
emetric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * emetric.diam s :=
begin
apply emetric.diam_le_of_forall_edist_le,
rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩,
calc edist (f x) (f y) ≤ ↑K * edist x y : hf.edist_le_mul x y
... ≤ ↑K * emetric.diam s :
ennreal.mul_left_mono (emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy)
end
/-- A Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous -/
protected lemma uniform_continuous (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
uniform_continuous f :=
begin
refine emetric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 (λε εpos, _),
use [ε/K, canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_pos.2 ⟨εpos, ennreal.inv_pos.2 $ ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩],
assume x y Dxy,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (hf.edist_le_mul x y),
rw [mul_comm],
exact ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div Dxy
end
/-- A Lipschitz function is continuous -/
protected lemma continuous (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
continuous f :=
hf.uniform_continuous.continuous
protected lemma const (b : β) : lipschitz_with 0 (λa:α, b) :=
assume x y, by simp only [edist_self, zero_le]
protected lemma id : lipschitz_with 1 (@id α) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ assume x y, le_refl _
protected lemma subtype_val (s : set α) : lipschitz_with 1 (subtype.val : s → α) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ assume x y, le_refl _
protected lemma subtype_coe (s : set α) : lipschitz_with 1 (coe : s → α) :=
lipschitz_with.subtype_val s
protected lemma restrict (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (s : set α) :
lipschitz_with K (s.restrict f) :=
λ x y, hf x y
protected lemma comp {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) : lipschitz_with (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) :=
assume x y,
calc edist (f (g x)) (f (g y)) ≤ Kf * edist (g x) (g y) : hf _ _
... ≤ Kf * (Kg * edist x y) : ennreal.mul_left_mono (hg _ _)
... = (Kf * Kg : ℝ≥0) * edist x y : by rw [← mul_assoc, ennreal.coe_mul]
protected lemma prod_fst : lipschitz_with 1 (@prod.fst α β) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ assume x y, le_max_left _ _
protected lemma prod_snd : lipschitz_with 1 (@prod.snd α β) :=
lipschitz_with.of_edist_le $ assume x y, le_max_right _ _
protected lemma prod {f : α → β} {Kf : ℝ≥0} (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f)
{g : α → γ} {Kg : ℝ≥0} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (max Kf Kg) (λ x, (f x, g x)) :=
begin
assume x y,
rw [ennreal.coe_mono.map_max, prod.edist_eq, ennreal.max_mul],
exact max_le_max (hf x y) (hg x y)
end
protected lemma uncurry {f : α → β → γ} {Kα Kβ : ℝ≥0} (hα : ∀ b, lipschitz_with Kα (λ a, f a b))
(hβ : ∀ a, lipschitz_with Kβ (f a)) :
lipschitz_with (Kα + Kβ) (function.uncurry f) :=
begin
rintros ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩,
simp only [function.uncurry, ennreal.coe_add, add_mul],
apply le_trans (edist_triangle _ (f a₂ b₁) _),
exact add_le_add (le_trans (hα _ _ _) $ ennreal.mul_left_mono $ le_max_left _ _)
(le_trans (hβ _ _ _) $ ennreal.mul_left_mono $ le_max_right _ _)
end
protected lemma iterate {f : α → α} (hf : lipschitz_with K f) :
∀n, lipschitz_with (K ^ n) (f^[n])
| 0 := lipschitz_with.id
| (n + 1) := by rw [pow_succ']; exact (iterate n).comp hf
lemma edist_iterate_succ_le_geometric {f : α → α} (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (x n) :
edist (f^[n] x) (f^[n + 1] x) ≤ edist x (f x) * K ^ n :=
begin
rw [iterate_succ, mul_comm],
simpa only [ennreal.coe_pow] using (hf.iterate n) x (f x)
end
open category_theory
protected lemma mul {f g : End α} {Kf Kg} (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf * Kg) (f * g : End α) :=
hf.comp hg
/-- The product of a list of Lipschitz continuous endomorphisms is a Lipschitz continuous
endomorphism. -/
protected lemma list_prod (f : ι → End α) (K : ι → ℝ≥0) (h : ∀ i, lipschitz_with (K i) (f i)) :
∀ l : list ι, lipschitz_with (l.map K).prod (l.map f).prod
| [] := by simp [types_id, lipschitz_with.id]
| (i :: l) := by { simp only [list.map_cons, list.prod_cons], exact (h i).mul (list_prod l) }
protected lemma pow {f : End α} {K} (h : lipschitz_with K f) :
∀ n : ℕ, lipschitz_with (K^n) (f^n : End α)
| 0 := lipschitz_with.id
| (n + 1) := h.mul (pow n)
end emetric
section metric
variables [metric_space α] [metric_space β] [metric_space γ] {K : ℝ≥0}
protected lemma of_dist_le' {f : α → β} {K : ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_with (nnreal.of_real K) f :=
of_dist_le_mul $ λ x y, le_trans (h x y) $
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (nnreal.le_coe_of_real K) dist_nonneg
protected lemma mk_one {f : α → β} (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) :
lipschitz_with 1 f :=
of_dist_le_mul $ by simpa only [nnreal.coe_one, one_mul] using h
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
doesn't assume `0≤K`. -/
protected lemma of_le_add_mul' {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ) (h : ∀x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_with (nnreal.of_real K) f :=
have I : ∀ x y, f x - f y ≤ K * dist x y,
from assume x y, sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 (h x y),
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le' $
assume x y,
abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨I x y, dist_comm y x ▸ I y x⟩
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
assumes `0≤K`. -/
protected lemma of_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ≥0) (h : ∀x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
lipschitz_with K f :=
by simpa only [nnreal.of_real_coe] using lipschitz_with.of_le_add_mul' K h
protected lemma of_le_add {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + dist x y) :
lipschitz_with 1 f :=
lipschitz_with.of_le_add_mul 1 $ by simpa only [nnreal.coe_one, one_mul]
protected lemma le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : lipschitz_with K f) (x y) :
f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 $ le_trans (le_abs_self _) $ h.dist_le_mul x y
protected lemma iff_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} :
lipschitz_with K f ↔ ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
⟨lipschitz_with.le_add_mul, lipschitz_with.of_le_add_mul K⟩
lemma nndist_le {f : α → β} (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (x y : α) :
nndist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * nndist x y :=
hf.dist_le_mul x y
lemma diam_image_le {f : α → β} (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (s : set α) (hs : metric.bounded s) :
metric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * metric.diam s :=
begin
apply metric.diam_le_of_forall_dist_le (mul_nonneg K.coe_nonneg metric.diam_nonneg),
rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩,
calc dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ↑K * dist x y : hf.dist_le_mul x y
... ≤ ↑K * metric.diam s :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (metric.dist_le_diam_of_mem hs hx hy) K.2
end
protected lemma dist_left (y : α) : lipschitz_with 1 (λ x, dist x y) :=
lipschitz_with.of_le_add $ assume x z, by { rw [add_comm], apply dist_triangle }
protected lemma dist_right (x : α) : lipschitz_with 1 (dist x) :=
lipschitz_with.of_le_add $ assume y z, dist_triangle_right _ _ _
protected lemma dist : lipschitz_with 2 (function.uncurry $ @dist α _) :=
lipschitz_with.uncurry lipschitz_with.dist_left lipschitz_with.dist_right
lemma dist_iterate_succ_le_geometric {f : α → α} (hf : lipschitz_with K f) (x n) :
dist (f^[n] x) (f^[n + 1] x) ≤ dist x (f x) * K ^ n :=
begin
rw [iterate_succ, mul_comm],
simpa only [nnreal.coe_pow] using (hf.iterate n).dist_le_mul x (f x)
end
end metric
end lipschitz_with
namespace lipschitz_on_with
variables [emetric_space α] [emetric_space β] [emetric_space γ] {K : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} {f : α → β}
protected lemma uniform_continuous_on (hf : lipschitz_on_with K f s) : uniform_continuous_on f s :=
uniform_continuous_on_iff_restrict.mpr (lipschitz_on_with_iff_restrict.mp hf).uniform_continuous
protected lemma continuous_on (hf : lipschitz_on_with K f s) : continuous_on f s :=
hf.uniform_continuous_on.continuous_on
end lipschitz_on_with
open metric
/-- If a function is locally Lipschitz around a point, then it is continuous at this point. -/
lemma continuous_at_of_locally_lipschitz [metric_space α] [metric_space β] {f : α → β} {x : α}
{r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (K : ℝ) (h : ∀y, dist y x < r → dist (f y) (f x) ≤ K * dist y x) :
continuous_at f x :=
begin
refine (nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_closed_ball).2
(λε εpos, ⟨min r (ε / max K 1), _, λ y hy, _⟩),
{ simp [hr, div_pos εpos, zero_lt_one] },
have A : max K 1 ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (lt_max_iff.2 (or.inr zero_lt_one)),
calc dist (f y) (f x)
≤ K * dist y x : h y (lt_of_lt_of_le hy (min_le_left _ _))
... ≤ max K 1 * dist y x : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left K 1) dist_nonneg
... ≤ max K 1 * (ε / max K 1) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hy (min_le_right _ _)))
(le_trans zero_le_one (le_max_right K 1))
... = ε : mul_div_cancel' _ A
end
|
336358b49d879efe4655345cc56018d01269e24a | 567aff36164621444bd9b795b12b12c75da86592 | /src/blank2.lean | 0221333ccd5505a3a832522f9efb2a7fb730fd32 | [] | no_license | kl-i/learning-type-theory | f8f2abed84b8b4577229242208973a1d9b666c6f | 0931a3a5cab90296a58d73466f91c5d785af5a62 | refs/heads/master | 1,666,935,945,903 | 1,592,390,170,000 | 1,592,390,170,000 | 272,946,300 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,710 | lean | #check list
-- list : Type u_1 → Type u_1
#check @list.rec
namespace hidden
inductive list : Type → Type
| nil : Π A : Type, list A
| append : Π A : Type, Π a : A, Π l : list A, list A
/-
universe level of type_of(arg #1) of 'hidden.list.nil' is
too big for the corresponding inductive datatype
-/
end hidden
universe u
inductive mylist (α : Sort u) : Sort u
| nil : mylist
| append : Π a : α, Π l : mylist, mylist
#check @mylist
#check @mylist.rec -- Not large eliminating
inductive mylist2 (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : mylist2
| append : Π a : α, Π l : mylist2, mylist2
#check @mylist2
#check @mylist2.rec -- Large eliminating, since Type u = Sort (u + 1), 1 ≤ u + 1
#check list false
def len (α : Type u) : mylist2 α → ℕ :=
let C : Π l : mylist2 α, Type := λ l : mylist2 α, ℕ in
@mylist2.rec α C 0 (λ a : α, λ l : mylist2 α, λ v : C l, v + 1)
#reduce len _ (@mylist2.append _ _ (@mylist2.nil _))
#check @eq.subst
#check @congr_arg
#print eq
#check @eq.rec
#check @eq.drec
inductive myeq (α : Sort u) : α → α → Sort 0
| refl : Π a : α, myeq a a
theorem imp_of_eq : Π P : Sort 0, Π Q : Sort 0, myeq (Sort 0) P Q → P → Q :=
@myeq.drec (Sort 0) (λ P Q : Sort 0, λ h : myeq (Sort 0) P Q, P → Q)
(λ P : Sort 0, λ h : P, h)
#check @myeq.drec -- this is the recursor in Mario's paper
#check @myeq.rec -- this is the one in Lean. Seems stronger.
inductive myle : ℕ → ℕ → Prop
| min : Π a b : ℕ, a = 0 → myle a b
| diag : Π a b : ℕ, myle a b → myle (a + 1) (b + 1)
#reduce myle 0 1
#reduce myle 1 0
#check @myle.drec
#check @nat.rec
def myle2 : ℕ → ℕ → Prop :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, Prop)
(λ n : ℕ, true)
(λ k : ℕ, λ v, @nat.rec (λ b : ℕ, Prop) (false) (λ l : ℕ, λ w, v l))
#reduce myle2 0 1
#reduce myle2 1 0
#print eq.subst
theorem not_myle_one_zero : myle 1 0 → false :=
λ h : myle 1 0, @myle.drec (λ a b : ℕ, λ hab, myle2 a b)
(λ a b : ℕ, λ ha : a = 0,
-- eq.subst ha.symm trivial -- doesn't work for some reason
by {apply eq.subst ha.symm, exact trivial}
)
(λ a b : ℕ, λ hab : myle a b, λ v, v)
1 0 h
#print nat.lt
#print nat.less_than_or_equal
#reduce nat.less_than_or_equal 0 1
#check @has_le.le
#reduce @has_le.le ℕ _
#check @nat.less_than_or_equal.drec
theorem nat_eq_or_succ_le_of : Π a b : ℕ, a ≤ b → a = b ∨ nat.succ a ≤ b :=
λ a : ℕ,
@nat.less_than_or_equal.drec a (λ b : ℕ, λ a_le_b, a = b ∨ nat.succ a ≤ b)
(or.inl (eq.refl a))
(λ b : ℕ, λ a_le_b, λ a_eq_b_or_suc_a_le_b,
or.inr $ or.elim a_eq_b_or_suc_a_le_b
(λ a_eq_b, a_eq_b ▸ nat.less_than_or_equal.refl)
(λ suc_a_le_b, nat.less_than_or_equal.step suc_a_le_b)
)
theorem nat_le_of_succ_le : Π {a b : ℕ}, nat.succ a ≤ b → a ≤ b :=
λ a : ℕ, @nat.less_than_or_equal.drec (nat.succ a) (λ b : ℕ, λ a_le_b, a ≤ b)
(nat.less_than_or_equal.step nat.less_than_or_equal.refl)
(λ b : ℕ, λ suc_a_le_b, λ a_le_b, nat.less_than_or_equal.step a_le_b)
theorem nat_le_trans : Π {a b c : ℕ}, a ≤ b → b ≤ c → a ≤ c :=
λ a b c : ℕ, λ a_le_b, λ b_le_c,
@nat.less_than_or_equal.drec a (λ b : ℕ, λ a_le_b, Π c : ℕ, b ≤ c → a ≤ c)
(λ c : ℕ, λ a_le_c, a_le_c)
(λ b : ℕ, λ a_le_b, λ forall_c_b_le_c_imp_a_le_c,
λ c : ℕ, λ suc_b_le_c,
forall_c_b_le_c_imp_a_le_c _ (nat.le_of_succ_le suc_b_le_c)
) b a_le_b c b_le_c
def nat_le_prop : ℕ → ℕ → Prop :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, Prop)
(λ n : ℕ, true)
(λ k : ℕ, λ v, @nat.rec (λ b : ℕ, Prop) (false) (λ l : ℕ, λ w, k ≤ l))
#reduce nat_le_prop 2 3
def nat_le_no_confusion_prop : Π a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, a ≤ b → nat_le_prop a b :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, a ≤ b → nat_le_prop a b)
(λ b : ℕ, λ zero_le_b, trivial)
(λ n : ℕ, λ ih,
@nat.less_than_or_equal.drec (nat.succ n)
(λ b : ℕ, λ a_le_b, nat_le_prop (nat.succ n) b)
(nat.less_than_or_equal.refl)
(λ b : ℕ, λ suc_n_le_b, λ succ_n_le_b, nat_le_of_succ_le suc_n_le_b)
)
theorem nat_le_of_succ_le_succ : Π {a b : ℕ}, nat.succ a ≤ nat.succ b → a ≤ b :=
λ a : ℕ, λ b : ℕ, nat_le_no_confusion_prop (nat.succ a) (nat.succ b)
def nat_le_val : ℕ → ℕ → Prop :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, Prop)
(λ n : ℕ, true)
(λ k : ℕ, λ v, @nat.rec (λ b : ℕ, Prop) (false) (λ l : ℕ, λ w, v l))
def nat_le_no_confusion : Π a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, a ≤ b → nat_le_val a b :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, a ≤ b → nat_le_val a b)
(λ b : ℕ, λ zero_le_b, trivial)
(λ n : ℕ, λ ih,
@nat.less_than_or_equal.drec (nat.succ n)
(λ b : ℕ, λ suc_n_le_b, nat_le_val (nat.succ n) b)
(ih n nat.less_than_or_equal.refl)
(λ b : ℕ, λ suc_n_le_b, λ v : nat_le_val (nat.succ n) b,
ih b $ nat_le_of_succ_le suc_n_le_b)
)
theorem not_succ_le_self : Π a : ℕ, nat.succ a ≤ a → false :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, nat.succ a ≤ a → false)
(nat_le_no_confusion 1 0)
(λ n : ℕ, λ ih, λ suc_suc_n_le_suc_n, ih
(nat_le_of_succ_le_succ suc_suc_n_le_suc_n)
)
#check @nat.less_than_or_equal.drec
theorem nat_le_antisymm : Π a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, a ≤ b → b ≤ a → a = b :=
λ a : ℕ,@nat.less_than_or_equal.drec a (λ b : ℕ, λ hab : a ≤ b, b ≤ a → a = b)
(λ ha : a ≤ a, eq.refl _)
(λ b : ℕ, λ a_le_b, λ b_le_a_imp_a_eq_b, λ suc_b_le_a,
false.elim $ not_succ_le_self b (nat.le_trans suc_b_le_a a_le_b)
)
def nat_eq : Π a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, Prop :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, Prop) -- inductive define on first component
(-- Case of a = 0,
@nat.rec (λ b : ℕ, Prop) -- induct on b
true -- 0 = 0
(λ n : ℕ, λ v, -- Suppose we know whether 0 = n or not.
false -- 0 ≠ n + 1 anyway.
)
)
(-- Case of a = n + 1,
λ n : ℕ, λ v, -- Suppose we know the {m : ℕ | nat_eq n m}
-- we need to define {m : ℕ | nat_eq (n + 1) m}
@nat.rec (λ b : ℕ, Prop) -- inductively define it.
false -- n + 1 ≠ 0
(λ m : ℕ, λ w, -- Suppose we know whether n + 1 = m or not.
v m -- define n + 1 = m + 1 as same value as n = m
)
)
def nat_no_confusion : Π a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, a = b → nat_eq a b :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, Π b : ℕ, a = b → nat_eq a b) -- induct on a
(λ b : ℕ, λ zero_eq_b, zero_eq_b ▸ trivial) -- a = 0
(λ n : ℕ, λ ih, λ b : ℕ, λ succ_n_eq_b, succ_n_eq_b ▸ ih n (eq.refl n))--a=n+1
example : 0 ≠ 1 := nat_no_confusion 0 1 -- why does this work...
theorem nat_not_succ_le_zero : Π a : ℕ, nat.succ a ≠ 0 :=
@nat.rec (λ a : ℕ, nat.succ a ≠ 0)
(nat_no_confusion 1 0)
(λ n : ℕ, λ succ_n_ne_zero, nat_no_confusion (nat.succ (nat.succ n)) 0) |
d3d6ebfd466ae00138bcc7793071365d9a641fd8 | ce89339993655da64b6ccb555c837ce6c10f9ef4 | /zeptometer/topprover/61.lean | 6f27fd3328820b553c2a15f75261092ead582d0c | [] | no_license | zeptometer/LearnLean | ef32dc36a22119f18d843f548d0bb42f907bff5d | bb84d5dbe521127ba134d4dbf9559b294a80b9f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,710,824,322 | 1,601,382,570,000 | 1,601,382,570,000 | 195,228,870 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 133 | lean | open option
theorem hoge :
∀ (x y : option ℕ) (n : ℕ),
(x = some n) -> (x = y ∨ x = none) → x = y := begin
end
|
48d0a5c2c04b91064f31a47e50ce23937b023499 | 12dabd587ce2621d9a4eff9f16e354d02e206c8e | /world04/level06.lean | 20c1c5eeceed5f1ce4ebdea6b11115646ff9b53d | [] | no_license | abdelq/natural-number-game | a1b5b8f1d52625a7addcefc97c966d3f06a48263 | bbddadc6d2e78ece2e9acd40fa7702ecc2db75c2 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,606,478,691 | 1,594,175,058,000 | 1,594,175,058,000 | 278,673,209 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 166 | lean | lemma mul_pow (a b n : mynat) : (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n :=
begin
induction n with h hd,
repeat {rw pow_zero},
rwa mul_one,
repeat {rw pow_succ},
rw hd,
simp,
end
|
db608d478bbf33634f6d81e223d4ccc6ff2f1b28 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/box_integral/partition/split.lean | 1e3e0ad4a63a04173e2b14a9c8a7768b8f568551 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,675 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.box_integral.partition.basic
/-!
# Split a box along one or more hyperplanes
## Main definitions
A hyperplane `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = a}` splits a rectangular box `I : box_integral.box ι` into two
smaller boxes. If `a ∉ Ioo (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, then one of these boxes is empty, so it is not a
box in the sense of `box_integral.box`.
We introduce the following definitions.
* `box_integral.box.split_lower I i a` and `box_integral.box.split_upper I i a` are these boxes (as
`with_bot (box_integral.box ι)`);
* `box_integral.prepartition.split I i a` is the partition of `I` made of these two boxes (or of one
box `I` if one of these boxes is empty);
* `box_integral.prepartition.split_many I s`, where `s : finset (ι × ℝ)` is a finite set of
hyperplanes `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = a}` encoded as pairs `(i, a)`, is the partition of `I` made by
cutting it along all the hyperplanes in `s`.
## Main results
The main result `box_integral.prepartition.exists_Union_eq_diff` says that any prepartition `π` of
`I` admits a prepartition `π'` of `I` that covers exactly `I \ π.Union`. One of these prepartitions
is available as `box_integral.prepartition.compl`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition, hyperplane
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators filter
open function set filter
namespace box_integral
variables {ι M : Type*} {n : ℕ}
namespace box
variables {I : box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ} {y : ι → ℝ}
/-- Given a box `I` and `x ∈ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, the hyperplane `{y : ι → ℝ | y i = x}` splits
`I` into two boxes. `box_integral.box.split_lower I i x` is the box `I ∩ {y | y i ≤ x}`
(if it is nonempty). As usual, we represent a box that may be empty as
`with_bot (box_integral.box ι)`. -/
def split_lower (I : box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : with_bot (box ι) :=
mk' I.lower (update I.upper i (min x (I.upper i)))
@[simp] lemma coe_split_lower : (split_lower I i x : set (ι → ℝ)) = I ∩ {y | y i ≤ x} :=
begin
rw [split_lower, coe_mk'],
ext y,
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_set_of_eq, forall_and_distrib,
← pi.le_def, le_update_iff, le_min_iff, and_assoc, and_forall_ne i, mem_def],
rw [and_comm (y i ≤ x), pi.le_def]
end
lemma split_lower_le : I.split_lower i x ≤ I := with_bot_coe_subset_iff.1 $ by simp
@[simp] lemma split_lower_eq_bot {i x} : I.split_lower i x = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ I.lower i :=
begin
rw [split_lower, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.upper (λ j y, y ≤ I.lower j)],
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
end
@[simp] lemma split_lower_eq_self : I.split_lower i x = I ↔ I.upper i ≤ x :=
by simp [split_lower, update_eq_iff]
lemma split_lower_def [decidable_eq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, I.lower j < update I.upper i x j :=
(forall_update_iff I.upper (λ j y, I.lower j < y)).2 ⟨h.1, λ j hne, I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.split_lower i x = (⟨I.lower, update I.upper i x, h'⟩ : box ι) :=
by { simp only [split_lower, mk'_eq_coe, min_eq_left h.2.le], use rfl, congr }
/-- Given a box `I` and `x ∈ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, the hyperplane `{y : ι → ℝ | y i = x}` splits
`I` into two boxes. `box_integral.box.split_upper I i x` is the box `I ∩ {y | x < y i}`
(if it is nonempty). As usual, we represent a box that may be empty as
`with_bot (box_integral.box ι)`. -/
def split_upper (I : box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : with_bot (box ι) :=
mk' (update I.lower i (max x (I.lower i))) I.upper
@[simp] lemma coe_split_upper : (split_upper I i x : set (ι → ℝ)) = I ∩ {y | x < y i} :=
begin
rw [split_upper, coe_mk'],
ext y,
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_set_of_eq, forall_and_distrib,
forall_update_iff I.lower (λ j z, z < y j), max_lt_iff, and_assoc (x < y i),
and_forall_ne i, mem_def],
exact and_comm _ _
end
lemma split_upper_le : I.split_upper i x ≤ I := with_bot_coe_subset_iff.1 $ by simp
@[simp] lemma split_upper_eq_bot {i x} : I.split_upper i x = ⊥ ↔ I.upper i ≤ x :=
begin
rw [split_upper, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.lower (λ j y, I.upper j ≤ y)],
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
end
@[simp] lemma split_upper_eq_self : I.split_upper i x = I ↔ x ≤ I.lower i :=
by simp [split_upper, update_eq_iff]
lemma split_upper_def [decidable_eq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, update I.lower i x j < I.upper j :=
(forall_update_iff I.lower (λ j y, y < I.upper j)).2 ⟨h.2, λ j hne, I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.split_upper i x = (⟨update I.lower i x, I.upper, h'⟩ : box ι) :=
by { simp only [split_upper, mk'_eq_coe, max_eq_left h.1.le], refine ⟨_, rfl⟩, congr }
lemma disjoint_split_lower_split_upper (I : box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
disjoint (I.split_lower i x) (I.split_upper i x) :=
begin
rw [← disjoint_with_bot_coe, coe_split_lower, coe_split_upper],
refine (disjoint.inf_left' _ _).inf_right' _,
rw set.disjoint_left,
exact λ y (hle : y i ≤ x) hlt, not_lt_of_le hle hlt
end
lemma split_lower_ne_split_upper (I : box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
I.split_lower i x ≠ I.split_upper i x :=
begin
cases le_or_lt x (I.lower i),
{ rw [split_upper_eq_self.2 h, split_lower_eq_bot.2 h], exact with_bot.bot_ne_coe },
{ refine (disjoint_split_lower_split_upper I i x).ne _,
rwa [ne.def, split_lower_eq_bot, not_le] }
end
end box
namespace prepartition
variables {I J : box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ}
/-- The partition of `I : box ι` into the boxes `I ∩ {y | y ≤ x i}` and `I ∩ {y | x i < y}`.
One of these boxes can be empty, then this partition is just the single-box partition `⊤`. -/
def split (I : box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : prepartition I :=
of_with_bot {I.split_lower i x, I.split_upper i x}
begin
simp only [finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton],
rintro J (rfl|rfl),
exacts [box.split_lower_le, box.split_upper_le]
end
begin
simp only [finset.coe_insert, finset.coe_singleton, true_and, set.mem_singleton_iff,
pairwise_insert_of_symmetric symmetric_disjoint, pairwise_singleton],
rintro J rfl -,
exact I.disjoint_split_lower_split_upper i x
end
@[simp] lemma mem_split_iff : J ∈ split I i x ↔ ↑J = I.split_lower i x ∨ ↑J = I.split_upper i x :=
by simp [split]
lemma mem_split_iff' : J ∈ split I i x ↔
(J : set (ι → ℝ)) = I ∩ {y | y i ≤ x} ∨ (J : set (ι → ℝ)) = I ∩ {y | x < y i} :=
by simp [mem_split_iff, ← box.with_bot_coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma Union_split (I : box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : (split I i x).Union = I :=
by simp [split, ← inter_union_distrib_left, ← set_of_or, le_or_lt]
lemma is_partition_split (I : box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : is_partition (split I i x) :=
is_partition_iff_Union_eq.2 $ Union_split I i x
lemma sum_split_boxes {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] (I : box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) (f : box ι → M) :
∑ J in (split I i x).boxes, f J = (I.split_lower i x).elim 0 f + (I.split_upper i x).elim 0 f :=
by rw [split, sum_of_with_bot, finset.sum_pair (I.split_lower_ne_split_upper i x)]
/-- If `x ∉ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, then the hyperplane `{y | y i = x}` does not split `I`. -/
lemma split_of_not_mem_Ioo (h : x ∉ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) : split I i x = ⊤ :=
begin
refine ((is_partition_top I).eq_of_boxes_subset (λ J hJ, _)).symm,
rcases mem_top.1 hJ with rfl, clear hJ,
rw [mem_boxes, mem_split_iff],
rw [mem_Ioo, not_and_distrib, not_lt, not_lt] at h,
cases h; [right, left],
{ rwa [eq_comm, box.split_upper_eq_self] },
{ rwa [eq_comm, box.split_lower_eq_self] }
end
lemma coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_mem_le {y : ι → ℝ} (h₁ : J ∈ split I i x) (h₂ : y ∈ J) (h₃ : y i ≤ x) :
(J : set (ι → ℝ)) = I ∩ {y | y i ≤ x} :=
(mem_split_iff'.1 h₁).resolve_right $ λ H,
by { rw [← box.mem_coe, H] at h₂, exact h₃.not_lt h₂.2 }
lemma coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_lt_mem {y : ι → ℝ} (h₁ : J ∈ split I i x) (h₂ : y ∈ J) (h₃ : x < y i) :
(J : set (ι → ℝ)) = I ∩ {y | x < y i} :=
(mem_split_iff'.1 h₁).resolve_left $ λ H,
by { rw [← box.mem_coe, H] at h₂, exact h₃.not_le h₂.2 }
@[simp] lemma restrict_split (h : I ≤ J) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : (split J i x).restrict I = split I i x :=
begin
refine ((is_partition_split J i x).restrict h).eq_of_boxes_subset _,
simp only [finset.subset_iff, mem_boxes, mem_restrict', exists_prop, mem_split_iff'],
have : ∀ s, (I ∩ s : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J, from λ s, (inter_subset_left _ _).trans h,
rintro J₁ ⟨J₂, (H₂|H₂), H₁⟩; [left, right]; simp [H₁, H₂, inter_left_comm ↑I, this],
end
lemma inf_split (π : prepartition I) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
π ⊓ split I i x = π.bUnion (λ J, split J i x) :=
bUnion_congr_of_le rfl $ λ J hJ, restrict_split hJ i x
/-- Split a box along many hyperplanes `{y | y i = x}`; each hyperplane is given by the pair
`(i x)`. -/
def split_many (I : box ι) (s : finset (ι × ℝ)) : prepartition I :=
s.inf (λ p, split I p.1 p.2)
@[simp] lemma split_many_empty (I : box ι) : split_many I ∅ = ⊤ := finset.inf_empty
@[simp] lemma split_many_insert (I : box ι) (s : finset (ι × ℝ)) (p : ι × ℝ) :
split_many I (insert p s) = split_many I s ⊓ split I p.1 p.2 :=
by rw [split_many, finset.inf_insert, inf_comm, split_many]
lemma split_many_le_split (I : box ι) {s : finset (ι × ℝ)} {p : ι × ℝ} (hp : p ∈ s) :
split_many I s ≤ split I p.1 p.2 :=
finset.inf_le hp
lemma is_partition_split_many (I : box ι) (s : finset (ι × ℝ)) :
is_partition (split_many I s) :=
finset.induction_on s (by simp only [split_many_empty, is_partition_top]) $
λ a s ha hs, by simpa only [split_many_insert, inf_split]
using hs.bUnion (λ J hJ, is_partition_split _ _ _)
@[simp] lemma Union_split_many (I : box ι) (s : finset (ι × ℝ)) : (split_many I s).Union = I :=
(is_partition_split_many I s).Union_eq
lemma inf_split_many {I : box ι} (π : prepartition I) (s : finset (ι × ℝ)) :
π ⊓ split_many I s = π.bUnion (λ J, split_many J s) :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction_on with p s hp ihp,
{ simp },
{ simp_rw [split_many_insert, ← inf_assoc, ihp, inf_split, bUnion_assoc] }
end
/-- Let `s : finset (ι × ℝ)` be a set of hyperplanes `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = r}` in `ι → ℝ` encoded as
pairs `(i, r)`. Suppose that this set contains all faces of a box `J`. The hyperplanes of `s` split
a box `I` into subboxes. Let `Js` be one of them. If `J` and `Js` have nonempty intersection, then
`Js` is a subbox of `J`. -/
lemma not_disjoint_imp_le_of_subset_of_mem_split_many {I J Js : box ι} {s : finset (ι × ℝ)}
(H : ∀ i, {(i, J.lower i), (i, J.upper i)} ⊆ s) (HJs : Js ∈ split_many I s)
(Hn : ¬disjoint (J : with_bot (box ι)) Js) : Js ≤ J :=
begin
simp only [finset.insert_subset, finset.singleton_subset_iff] at H,
rcases box.not_disjoint_coe_iff_nonempty_inter.mp Hn with ⟨x, hx, hxs⟩,
refine λ y hy i, ⟨_, _⟩,
{ rcases split_many_le_split I (H i).1 HJs with ⟨Jl, Hmem : Jl ∈ split I i (J.lower i), Hle⟩,
have := Hle hxs,
rw [← box.coe_subset_coe, coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_lt_mem Hmem this (hx i).1] at Hle,
exact (Hle hy).2 },
{ rcases split_many_le_split I (H i).2 HJs with ⟨Jl, Hmem : Jl ∈ split I i (J.upper i), Hle⟩,
have := Hle hxs,
rw [← box.coe_subset_coe, coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_mem_le Hmem this (hx i).2] at Hle,
exact (Hle hy).2 }
end
section fintype
variable [finite ι]
/-- Let `s` be a finite set of boxes in `ℝⁿ = ι → ℝ`. Then there exists a finite set `t₀` of
hyperplanes (namely, the set of all hyperfaces of boxes in `s`) such that for any `t ⊇ t₀`
and any box `I` in `ℝⁿ` the following holds. The hyperplanes from `t` split `I` into subboxes.
Let `J'` be one of them, and let `J` be one of the boxes in `s`. If these boxes have a nonempty
intersection, then `J' ≤ J`. -/
lemma eventually_not_disjoint_imp_le_of_mem_split_many (s : finset (box ι)) :
∀ᶠ t : finset (ι × ℝ) in at_top, ∀ (I : box ι) (J ∈ s) (J' ∈ split_many I t),
¬disjoint (J : with_bot (box ι)) J' → J' ≤ J :=
begin
casesI nonempty_fintype ι,
refine eventually_at_top.2
⟨s.bUnion (λ J, finset.univ.bUnion (λ i, {(i, J.lower i), (i, J.upper i)})),
λ t ht I J hJ J' hJ', not_disjoint_imp_le_of_subset_of_mem_split_many (λ i, _) hJ'⟩,
exact λ p hp, ht (finset.mem_bUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, finset.mem_bUnion.2 ⟨i, finset.mem_univ _, hp⟩⟩)
end
lemma eventually_split_many_inf_eq_filter (π : prepartition I) :
∀ᶠ t : finset (ι × ℝ) in at_top,
π ⊓ (split_many I t) = (split_many I t).filter (λ J, ↑J ⊆ π.Union) :=
begin
refine (eventually_not_disjoint_imp_le_of_mem_split_many π.boxes).mono (λ t ht, _),
refine le_antisymm ((bUnion_le_iff _).2 $ λ J hJ, _) (le_inf (λ J hJ, _) (filter_le _ _)),
{ refine of_with_bot_mono _,
simp only [finset.mem_image, exists_prop, mem_boxes, mem_filter],
rintro _ ⟨J₁, h₁, rfl⟩ hne,
refine ⟨_, ⟨J₁, ⟨h₁, subset.trans _ (π.subset_Union hJ)⟩, rfl⟩, le_rfl⟩,
exact ht I J hJ J₁ h₁ (mt disjoint_iff.1 hne) },
{ rw mem_filter at hJ,
rcases set.mem_Union₂.1 (hJ.2 J.upper_mem) with ⟨J', hJ', hmem⟩,
refine ⟨J', hJ', ht I _ hJ' _ hJ.1 $ box.not_disjoint_coe_iff_nonempty_inter.2 _⟩,
exact ⟨J.upper, hmem, J.upper_mem⟩ }
end
lemma exists_split_many_inf_eq_filter_of_finite (s : set (prepartition I)) (hs : s.finite) :
∃ t : finset (ι × ℝ), ∀ π ∈ s,
π ⊓ (split_many I t) = (split_many I t).filter (λ J, ↑J ⊆ π.Union) :=
begin
have := λ π (hπ : π ∈ s), eventually_split_many_inf_eq_filter π,
exact (hs.eventually_all.2 this).exists
end
/-- If `π` is a partition of `I`, then there exists a finite set `s` of hyperplanes such that
`split_many I s ≤ π`. -/
lemma is_partition.exists_split_many_le {I : box ι} {π : prepartition I}
(h : is_partition π) : ∃ s, split_many I s ≤ π :=
(eventually_split_many_inf_eq_filter π).exists.imp $ λ s hs,
by { rwa [h.Union_eq, filter_of_true, inf_eq_right] at hs, exact λ J hJ, le_of_mem _ hJ }
/-- For every prepartition `π` of `I` there exists a prepartition that covers exactly
`I \ π.Union`. -/
lemma exists_Union_eq_diff (π : prepartition I) :
∃ π' : prepartition I, π'.Union = I \ π.Union :=
begin
rcases π.eventually_split_many_inf_eq_filter.exists with ⟨s, hs⟩,
use (split_many I s).filter (λ J, ¬(J : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ π.Union),
simp [← hs]
end
/-- If `π` is a prepartition of `I`, then `π.compl` is a prepartition of `I`
such that `π.compl.Union = I \ π.Union`. -/
def compl (π : prepartition I) : prepartition I := π.exists_Union_eq_diff.some
@[simp] lemma Union_compl (π : prepartition I) : π.compl.Union = I \ π.Union :=
π.exists_Union_eq_diff.some_spec
/-- Since the definition of `box_integral.prepartition.compl` uses `Exists.some`,
the result depends only on `π.Union`. -/
lemma compl_congr {π₁ π₂ : prepartition I} (h : π₁.Union = π₂.Union) :
π₁.compl = π₂.compl :=
by { dunfold compl, congr' 1, rw h }
lemma is_partition.compl_eq_bot {π : prepartition I} (h : is_partition π) : π.compl = ⊥ :=
by rw [← Union_eq_empty, Union_compl, h.Union_eq, diff_self]
@[simp] lemma compl_top : (⊤ : prepartition I).compl = ⊥ := (is_partition_top I).compl_eq_bot
end fintype
end prepartition
end box_integral
|
e8dbd0e8cf6b78933de39d83bab2fff7c42cc54f | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/data/multiset/nat_antidiagonal.lean | 5c04a0917896b26eb53c784f8beccad80e3c288d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,484 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import data.multiset.nodup
import data.list.nat_antidiagonal
/-!
# The "antidiagonal" {(0,n), (1,n-1), ..., (n,0)} as a multiset.
-/
namespace multiset
namespace nat
/-- The antidiagonal of a natural number `n` is
the multiset of pairs `(i,j)` such that `i+j = n`. -/
def antidiagonal (n : ℕ) : multiset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
list.nat.antidiagonal n
/-- A pair (i,j) is contained in the antidiagonal of `n` if and only if `i+j=n`. -/
@[simp] lemma mem_antidiagonal {n : ℕ} {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x ∈ antidiagonal n ↔ x.1 + x.2 = n :=
by rw [antidiagonal, mem_coe, list.nat.mem_antidiagonal]
/-- The cardinality of the antidiagonal of `n` is `n+1`. -/
@[simp] lemma card_antidiagonal (n : ℕ) : (antidiagonal n).card = n+1 :=
by rw [antidiagonal, coe_card, list.nat.length_antidiagonal]
/-- The antidiagonal of `0` is the list `[(0,0)]` -/
@[simp] lemma antidiagonal_zero : antidiagonal 0 = {(0, 0)} :=
rfl
/-- The antidiagonal of `n` does not contain duplicate entries. -/
@[simp] lemma nodup_antidiagonal (n : ℕ) : nodup (antidiagonal n) :=
coe_nodup.2 $ list.nat.nodup_antidiagonal n
@[simp] lemma antidiagonal_succ {n : ℕ} :
antidiagonal (n + 1) = (0, n + 1) :: ((antidiagonal n).map (prod.map nat.succ id)) :=
by simp only [antidiagonal, list.nat.antidiagonal_succ, coe_map, cons_coe]
end nat
end multiset
|
066254e1e5212feea3ff5a97e640608ff61ac582 | 4bcaca5dc83d49803f72b7b5920b75b6e7d9de2d | /src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Contradiction.lean | 9121ee90b627a4eb31bd98750ac2f391a0eaa3a1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | subfish-zhou/leanprover-zh_CN.github.io | 30b9fba9bd790720bd95764e61ae796697d2f603 | 8b2985d4a3d458ceda9361ac454c28168d920d3f | refs/heads/master | 1,689,709,967,820 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 1,632,503,056,000 | 409,962,097 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,668 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.MatchUtil
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Assumption
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Cases
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Apply
namespace Lean.Meta
structure Contradiction.Config where
useDecide : Bool := true
/- When checking for empty types, `searchFuel` specifies the number of goals visited. -/
searchFuel : Nat := 16
/- Support for hypotheses such as
```
h : (x y : Nat) (ys : List Nat) → x = 0 → y::ys = [a, b, c] → False
```
This kind of hypotheses appear when proving conditional equation theorems for match expressions. -/
genDiseq : Bool := false
-- We only consider inductives with no constructors and indexed families
private def isElimEmptyInductiveCandidate (fvarId : FVarId) : MetaM Bool := do
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl fvarId
let type ← whnfD localDecl.type
matchConstInduct type.getAppFn (fun _ => pure false) fun info _ => do
return info.ctors.length == 0 || info.numIndices > 0
namespace ElimEmptyInductive
abbrev M := StateRefT Nat MetaM
instance : MonadBacktrack SavedState M where
saveState := Meta.saveState
restoreState s := s.restore
partial def elim (mvarId : MVarId) (fvarId : FVarId) : M Bool := do
if (← get) == 0 then
trace[Meta.Tactic.contradiction] "elimEmptyInductive out-of-fuel"
return false
modify (. - 1)
-- We only consider inductives with no constructors and indexed families
commitWhen do
let subgoals ← try cases mvarId fvarId catch ex => trace[Meta.Tactic.contradiction] "{ex.toMessageData}"; return false
trace[Meta.Tactic.contradiction] "elimEmptyInductive, number subgoals: {subgoals.size}"
for subgoal in subgoals do
-- If one of the fields is uninhabited, then we are done
let found ← withMVarContext subgoal.mvarId do
for field in subgoal.fields do
let field := subgoal.subst.apply field
if field.isFVar then
if (← isElimEmptyInductiveCandidate field.fvarId!) then
if (← elim subgoal.mvarId field.fvarId!) then
return true
return false
unless found == true do -- TODO: check why we need true here
return false
return true
end ElimEmptyInductive
private def elimEmptyInductive (mvarId : MVarId) (fvarId : FVarId) (fuel : Nat) : MetaM Bool := do
withMVarContext mvarId do
if (← isElimEmptyInductiveCandidate fvarId) then
commitWhen do
ElimEmptyInductive.elim (← exfalso mvarId) fvarId |>.run' fuel
else
return false
/-- Return true if `e` is of the form `(x : α) → ... → s = t → ... → False` -/
private def isGenDiseq (e : Expr) : Bool :=
match e with
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ => (d.isEq || b.hasLooseBVar 0) && isGenDiseq b
| _ => e.isConstOf ``False
/--
Close goal if `localDecl` is a "generalized disequality". Example:
```
h : (x y : Nat) (ys : List Nat) → x = 0 → y::ys = [a, b, c] → False
```
This kind of hypotheses is created when we generate conditional equations for match expressions.
-/
private def processGenDiseq (mvarId : MVarId) (localDecl : LocalDecl) : MetaM Bool := do
assert! isGenDiseq localDecl.type
let val? ← withNewMCtxDepth do
let (args, _, _) ← forallMetaTelescope localDecl.type
for arg in args do
let argType ← inferType arg
if let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← matchEq? argType then
unless (← isDefEq lhs rhs) do
return none
unless (← isDefEq arg (← mkEqRefl lhs)) do
return none
let falseProof ← instantiateMVars (mkAppN localDecl.toExpr args)
if (← hasAssignableMVar falseProof) then
return none
return some (← mkFalseElim (← getMVarType mvarId) falseProof)
if let some val := val? then
assignExprMVar mvarId val
return true
else
return false
def contradictionCore (mvarId : MVarId) (config : Contradiction.Config) : MetaM Bool := do
withMVarContext mvarId do
checkNotAssigned mvarId `contradiction
for localDecl in (← getLCtx) do
unless localDecl.isAuxDecl do
-- (h : ¬ p) (h' : p)
if let some p ← matchNot? localDecl.type then
if let some pFVarId ← findLocalDeclWithType? p then
assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkAbsurd (← getMVarType mvarId) (mkFVar pFVarId) localDecl.toExpr)
return true
-- (h : x ≠ x)
if let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← matchNe? localDecl.type then
if (← isDefEq lhs rhs) then
assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkAbsurd (← getMVarType mvarId) (← mkEqRefl lhs) localDecl.toExpr)
return true
let mut isEq := false
-- (h : ctor₁ ... = ctor₂ ...)
if let some (_, lhs, rhs) ← matchEq? localDecl.type then
isEq := true
if let some lhsCtor ← matchConstructorApp? lhs then
if let some rhsCtor ← matchConstructorApp? rhs then
if lhsCtor.name != rhsCtor.name then
assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkNoConfusion (← getMVarType mvarId) localDecl.toExpr)
return true
-- (h : p) s.t. `decide p` evaluates to `false`
if config.useDecide && !localDecl.type.hasFVar then
let type ← instantiateMVars localDecl.type
if !type.hasMVar && !type.hasFVar then
try
let d ← mkDecide localDecl.type
let r ← withDefault <| whnf d
if r.isConstOf ``false then
let hn := mkAppN (mkConst ``of_decide_eq_false) <| d.getAppArgs.push (← mkEqRefl d)
assignExprMVar mvarId (← mkAbsurd (← getMVarType mvarId) localDecl.toExpr hn)
return true
catch _ =>
pure ()
-- "generalized" diseq
if config.genDiseq && isGenDiseq localDecl.type then
if (← processGenDiseq mvarId localDecl) then
return true
-- (h : <empty-inductive-type>)
unless isEq do
-- We do not use `elimEmptyInductive` for equality, since `cases h` produces a huge proof
-- when `(h : 10000 = 10001)`. TODO: `cases` add a threshold at `cases`
if (← elimEmptyInductive mvarId localDecl.fvarId config.searchFuel) then
return true
return false
def contradiction (mvarId : MVarId) (config : Contradiction.Config := {}) : MetaM Unit :=
unless (← contradictionCore mvarId config) do
throwTacticEx `contradiction mvarId ""
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Meta.Tactic.contradiction
end Lean.Meta
|
8fd7affebf4b9ea72beb9e34bdd94facc0b0fc8a | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebraic_geometry/structure_sheaf.lean | edae040d083327793efa1191cc2c6290d7173e1b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 48,955 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Scott Morrison
-/
import algebraic_geometry.prime_spectrum.basic
import algebra.category.Ring.colimits
import algebra.category.Ring.limits
import topology.sheaves.local_predicate
import ring_theory.localization.at_prime
import ring_theory.subring.basic
/-!
# The structure sheaf on `prime_spectrum R`.
We define the structure sheaf on `Top.of (prime_spectrum R)`, for a commutative ring `R` and prove
basic properties about it. We define this as a subsheaf of the sheaf of dependent functions into the
localizations, cut out by the condition that the function must be locally equal to a ratio of
elements of `R`.
Because the condition "is equal to a fraction" passes to smaller open subsets,
the subset of functions satisfying this condition is automatically a subpresheaf.
Because the condition "is locally equal to a fraction" is local,
it is also a subsheaf.
(It may be helpful to refer back to `topology.sheaves.sheaf_of_functions`,
where we show that dependent functions into any type family form a sheaf,
and also `topology.sheaves.local_predicate`, where we characterise the predicates
which pick out sub-presheaves and sub-sheaves of these sheaves.)
We also set up the ring structure, obtaining
`structure_sheaf R : sheaf CommRing (Top.of (prime_spectrum R))`.
We then construct two basic isomorphisms, relating the structure sheaf to the underlying ring `R`.
First, `structure_sheaf.stalk_iso` gives an isomorphism between the stalk of the structure sheaf
at a point `p` and the localization of `R` at the prime ideal `p`. Second,
`structure_sheaf.basic_open_iso` gives an isomorphism between the structure sheaf on `basic_open f`
and the localization of `R` at the submonoid of powers of `f`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
universe u
noncomputable theory
variables (R : Type u) [comm_ring R]
open Top
open topological_space
open category_theory
open opposite
namespace algebraic_geometry
/--
The prime spectrum, just as a topological space.
-/
def prime_spectrum.Top : Top := Top.of (prime_spectrum R)
namespace structure_sheaf
/--
The type family over `prime_spectrum R` consisting of the localization over each point.
-/
@[derive [comm_ring, local_ring]]
def localizations (P : prime_spectrum.Top R) : Type u := localization.at_prime P.as_ideal
instance (P : prime_spectrum.Top R) : inhabited (localizations R P) :=
⟨1⟩
instance (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : U) :
algebra R (localizations R x) :=
localization.algebra
instance (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : U) :
is_localization.at_prime (localizations R x) (x : prime_spectrum.Top R).as_ideal :=
localization.is_localization
variables {R}
/--
The predicate saying that a dependent function on an open `U` is realised as a fixed fraction
`r / s` in each of the stalks (which are localizations at various prime ideals).
-/
def is_fraction {U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)} (f : Π x : U, localizations R x) : Prop :=
∃ (r s : R), ∀ x : U,
¬ (s ∈ x.1.as_ideal) ∧ f x * algebra_map _ _ s = algebra_map _ _ r
lemma is_fraction.eq_mk' {U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)} {f : Π x : U, localizations R x}
(hf : is_fraction f) :
∃ (r s : R) , ∀ x : U, ∃ (hs : s ∉ x.1.as_ideal), f x =
is_localization.mk' (localization.at_prime _) r
(⟨s, hs⟩ : (x : prime_spectrum.Top R).as_ideal.prime_compl) :=
begin
rcases hf with ⟨r, s, h⟩,
refine ⟨r, s, λ x, ⟨(h x).1, (is_localization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.mpr _).symm⟩⟩,
exact (h x).2.symm,
end
variables (R)
/--
The predicate `is_fraction` is "prelocal",
in the sense that if it holds on `U` it holds on any open subset `V` of `U`.
-/
def is_fraction_prelocal : prelocal_predicate (localizations R) :=
{ pred := λ U f, is_fraction f,
res := by { rintro V U i f ⟨r, s, w⟩, exact ⟨r, s, λ x, w (i x)⟩ } }
/--
We will define the structure sheaf as
the subsheaf of all dependent functions in `Π x : U, localizations R x`
consisting of those functions which can locally be expressed as a ratio of
(the images in the localization of) elements of `R`.
Quoting Hartshorne:
For an open set $U ⊆ Spec A$, we define $𝒪(U)$ to be the set of functions
$s : U → ⨆_{𝔭 ∈ U} A_𝔭$, such that $s(𝔭) ∈ A_𝔭$ for each $𝔭$,
and such that $s$ is locally a quotient of elements of $A$:
to be precise, we require that for each $𝔭 ∈ U$, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $𝔭$,
contained in $U$, and elements $a, f ∈ A$, such that for each $𝔮 ∈ V, f ∉ 𝔮$,
and $s(𝔮) = a/f$ in $A_𝔮$.
Now Hartshorne had the disadvantage of not knowing about dependent functions,
so we replace his circumlocution about functions into a disjoint union with
`Π x : U, localizations x`.
-/
def is_locally_fraction : local_predicate (localizations R) :=
(is_fraction_prelocal R).sheafify
@[simp]
lemma is_locally_fraction_pred
{U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)} (f : Π x : U, localizations R x) :
(is_locally_fraction R).pred f =
∀ x : U, ∃ (V) (m : x.1 ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U),
∃ (r s : R), ∀ y : V,
¬ (s ∈ y.1.as_ideal) ∧
f (i y : U) * algebra_map _ _ s = algebra_map _ _ r :=
rfl
/--
The functions satisfying `is_locally_fraction` form a subring.
-/
def sections_subring (U : (opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
subring (Π x : unop U, localizations R x) :=
{ carrier := { f | (is_locally_fraction R).pred f },
zero_mem' :=
begin
refine λ x, ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 0, 1, λ y, ⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ rw ←ideal.ne_top_iff_one, exact y.1.is_prime.1, },
{ simp, },
end,
one_mem' :=
begin
refine λ x, ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 1, 1, λ y, ⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ rw ←ideal.ne_top_iff_one, exact y.1.is_prime.1, },
{ simp, },
end,
add_mem' :=
begin
intros a b ha hb x,
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩,
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩,
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, opens.inf_le_left _ _ ≫ ia, ra * sb + rb * sa, sa * sb, _⟩,
intro y,
rcases wa (opens.inf_le_left _ _ y) with ⟨nma, wa⟩,
rcases wb (opens.inf_le_right _ _ y) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩,
fsplit,
{ intro H, cases y.1.is_prime.mem_or_mem H; contradiction, },
{ simp only [add_mul, ring_hom.map_add, pi.add_apply, ring_hom.map_mul],
erw [←wa, ←wb],
simp only [mul_assoc],
congr' 2,
rw [mul_comm], refl, }
end,
neg_mem' :=
begin
intros a ha x,
rcases ha x with ⟨V, m, i, r, s, w⟩,
refine ⟨V, m, i, -r, s, _⟩,
intro y,
rcases w y with ⟨nm, w⟩,
fsplit,
{ exact nm, },
{ simp only [ring_hom.map_neg, pi.neg_apply],
erw [←w],
simp only [neg_mul], }
end,
mul_mem' :=
begin
intros a b ha hb x,
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩,
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩,
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, opens.inf_le_left _ _ ≫ ia, ra * rb, sa * sb, _⟩,
intro y,
rcases wa (opens.inf_le_left _ _ y) with ⟨nma, wa⟩,
rcases wb (opens.inf_le_right _ _ y) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩,
fsplit,
{ intro H, cases y.1.is_prime.mem_or_mem H; contradiction, },
{ simp only [pi.mul_apply, ring_hom.map_mul],
erw [←wa, ←wb],
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm],
refl, }
end, }
end structure_sheaf
open structure_sheaf
/--
The structure sheaf (valued in `Type`, not yet `CommRing`) is the subsheaf consisting of
functions satisfying `is_locally_fraction`.
-/
def structure_sheaf_in_Type : sheaf (Type u) (prime_spectrum.Top R):=
subsheaf_to_Types (is_locally_fraction R)
instance comm_ring_structure_sheaf_in_Type_obj (U : (opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
comm_ring ((structure_sheaf_in_Type R).1.obj U) :=
(sections_subring R U).to_comm_ring
open _root_.prime_spectrum
/--
The structure presheaf, valued in `CommRing`, constructed by dressing up the `Type` valued
structure presheaf.
-/
@[simps]
def structure_presheaf_in_CommRing : presheaf CommRing (prime_spectrum.Top R) :=
{ obj := λ U, CommRing.of ((structure_sheaf_in_Type R).1.obj U),
map := λ U V i,
{ to_fun := ((structure_sheaf_in_Type R).1.map i),
map_zero' := rfl,
map_add' := λ x y, rfl,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ x y, rfl, }, }
/--
Some glue, verifying that that structure presheaf valued in `CommRing` agrees
with the `Type` valued structure presheaf.
-/
def structure_presheaf_comp_forget :
structure_presheaf_in_CommRing R ⋙ (forget CommRing) ≅ (structure_sheaf_in_Type R).1 :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ U, iso.refl _)
(by tidy)
open Top.presheaf
/--
The structure sheaf on $Spec R$, valued in `CommRing`.
This is provided as a bundled `SheafedSpace` as `Spec.SheafedSpace R` later.
-/
def Spec.structure_sheaf : sheaf CommRing (prime_spectrum.Top R) :=
⟨structure_presheaf_in_CommRing R,
-- We check the sheaf condition under `forget CommRing`.
(is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_comp _ _).mpr
(is_sheaf_of_iso (structure_presheaf_comp_forget R).symm
(structure_sheaf_in_Type R).cond)⟩
open Spec (structure_sheaf)
namespace structure_sheaf
@[simp] lemma res_apply (U V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U)
(s : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : V) :
((structure_sheaf R).1.map i.op s).1 x = (s.1 (i x) : _) :=
rfl
/-
Notation in this comment
X = Spec R
OX = structure sheaf
In the following we construct an isomorphism between OX_p and R_p given any point p corresponding
to a prime ideal in R.
We do this via 8 steps:
1. def const (f g : R) (V) (hv : V ≤ D_g) : OX(V) [for api]
2. def to_open (U) : R ⟶ OX(U)
3. [2] def to_stalk (p : Spec R) : R ⟶ OX_p
4. [2] def to_basic_open (f : R) : R_f ⟶ OX(D_f)
5. [3] def localization_to_stalk (p : Spec R) : R_p ⟶ OX_p
6. def open_to_localization (U) (p) (hp : p ∈ U) : OX(U) ⟶ R_p
7. [6] def stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom (p : Spec R) : OX_p ⟶ R_p
8. [5,7] def stalk_iso (p : Spec R) : OX_p ≅ R_p
In the square brackets we list the dependencies of a construction on the previous steps.
-/
/-- The section of `structure_sheaf R` on an open `U` sending each `x ∈ U` to the element
`f/g` in the localization of `R` at `x`. -/
def const (f g : R) (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : prime_spectrum.Top R).as_ideal.prime_compl) :
(structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U) :=
⟨λ x, is_localization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩,
λ x, ⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, g, λ y, ⟨hu y y.2, is_localization.mk'_spec _ _ _⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma const_apply (f g : R) (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : prime_spectrum.Top R).as_ideal.prime_compl) (x : U) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x = is_localization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩ :=
rfl
lemma const_apply' (f g : R) (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : prime_spectrum.Top R).as_ideal.prime_compl) (x : U)
(hx : g ∈ (as_ideal (x : prime_spectrum.Top R)).prime_compl) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x = is_localization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hx⟩ :=
rfl
lemma exists_const (U) (s : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : prime_spectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
∃ (V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (hxV : x ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U) (f g : R) hg,
const R f g V hg = (structure_sheaf R).1.map i.op s :=
let ⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, hfg⟩ := s.2 ⟨x, hx⟩ in
⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, λ y hyV, (hfg ⟨y, hyV⟩).1, subtype.eq $ funext $ λ y,
is_localization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 $ eq.symm $ (hfg y).2⟩
@[simp] lemma res_const (f g : R) (U hu V hv i) :
(structure_sheaf R).1.map i (const R f g U hu) = const R f g V hv :=
rfl
lemma res_const' (f g : R) (V hv) :
(structure_sheaf R).1.map (hom_of_le hv).op (const R f g (basic_open g) (λ _, id)) =
const R f g V hv :=
rfl
lemma const_zero (f : R) (U hu) : const R 0 f U hu = 0 :=
subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, is_localization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 $
by erw [ring_hom.map_zero, subtype.val_eq_coe, subring.coe_zero, pi.zero_apply, zero_mul]
lemma const_self (f : R) (U hu) : const R f f U hu = 1 :=
subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, is_localization.mk'_self _ _
lemma const_one (U) : const R 1 1 U (λ p _, submonoid.one_mem _) = 1 :=
const_self R 1 U _
lemma const_add (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ + const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * g₂ + f₂ * g₁) (g₁ * g₂) U (λ x hx, submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx)) :=
subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, eq.symm $
by convert is_localization.mk'_add f₁ f₂ ⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
lemma const_mul (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ * const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) U (λ x hx, submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx)) :=
subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, eq.symm $
by convert is_localization.mk'_mul _ f₁ f₂ ⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
lemma const_ext {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu₁ hu₂} (h : f₁ * g₂ = f₂ * g₁) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ = const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ :=
subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, is_localization.mk'_eq_of_eq h.symm
lemma const_congr {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu} (hf : f₁ = f₂) (hg : g₁ = g₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu = const R f₂ g₂ U (hg ▸ hu) :=
by substs hf hg
lemma const_mul_rev (f g : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f g U hu₁ * const R g f U hu₂ = 1 :=
by rw [const_mul, const_congr R rfl (mul_comm g f), const_self]
lemma const_mul_cancel (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f g₁ U hu₁ * const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ :=
by { rw [const_mul, const_ext], rw mul_assoc }
lemma const_mul_cancel' (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ * const R f g₁ U hu₁ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ :=
by rw [mul_comm, const_mul_cancel]
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting an element of `R` as
a section of the structure sheaf. -/
def to_open (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) :
CommRing.of R ⟶ (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ⟨λ x, algebra_map R _ f,
λ x, ⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, 1, λ y, ⟨(ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).1 y.1.2.1,
by { rw [ring_hom.map_one, mul_one], refl } ⟩⟩⟩,
map_one' := subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, ring_hom.map_one _,
map_mul' := λ f g, subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, ring_hom.map_mul _ _ _,
map_zero' := subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, ring_hom.map_zero _,
map_add' := λ f g, subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, ring_hom.map_add _ _ _ }
@[simp] lemma to_open_res (U V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U) :
to_open R U ≫ (structure_sheaf R).1.map i.op = to_open R V :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_open_apply (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (f : R) (x : U) :
(to_open R U f).1 x = algebra_map _ _ f :=
rfl
lemma to_open_eq_const (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (f : R) : to_open R U f =
const R f 1 U (λ x _, (ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).1 x.2.1) :=
subtype.eq $ funext $ λ x, eq.symm $ is_localization.mk'_one _ f
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting an element of `R` as an element of
the stalk of `structure_sheaf R` at `x`. -/
def to_stalk (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) : CommRing.of R ⟶ (structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk x :=
(to_open R ⊤ ≫ (structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ ⟨x, ⟨⟩⟩ : _)
@[simp] lemma to_open_germ (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : U) :
to_open R U ≫ (structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ x =
to_stalk R x :=
by { rw [← to_open_res R ⊤ U (hom_of_le le_top : U ⟶ ⊤), category.assoc, presheaf.germ_res], refl }
@[simp] lemma germ_to_open (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : U) (f : R) :
(structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ x (to_open R U f) = to_stalk R x f :=
by { rw ← to_open_germ, refl }
lemma germ_to_top (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
(structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ (⟨x, trivial⟩ : (⊤ : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)))
(to_open R ⊤ f) =
to_stalk R x f :=
rfl
lemma is_unit_to_basic_open_self (f : R) : is_unit (to_open R (basic_open f) f) :=
is_unit_of_mul_eq_one _ (const R 1 f (basic_open f) (λ _, id)) $
by rw [to_open_eq_const, const_mul_rev]
lemma is_unit_to_stalk (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) (f : x.as_ideal.prime_compl) :
is_unit (to_stalk R x (f : R)) :=
by { erw ← germ_to_open R (basic_open (f : R)) ⟨x, f.2⟩ (f : R),
exact ring_hom.is_unit_map _ (is_unit_to_basic_open_self R f) }
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from the localization of `R` at `p` to the stalk
of the structure sheaf at the point `p`. -/
def localization_to_stalk (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) :
CommRing.of (localization.at_prime x.as_ideal) ⟶ (structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk x :=
show localization.at_prime x.as_ideal →+* _, from
is_localization.lift (is_unit_to_stalk R x)
@[simp] lemma localization_to_stalk_of (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
localization_to_stalk R x (algebra_map _ (localization _) f) = to_stalk R x f :=
is_localization.lift_eq _ f
@[simp] lemma localization_to_stalk_mk' (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) (f : R)
(s : (as_ideal x).prime_compl) :
localization_to_stalk R x (is_localization.mk' _ f s : localization _) =
(structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ (⟨x, s.2⟩ : basic_open (s : R))
(const R f s (basic_open s) (λ _, id)) :=
(is_localization.lift_mk'_spec _ _ _ _).2 $
by erw [← germ_to_open R (basic_open s) ⟨x, s.2⟩, ← germ_to_open R (basic_open s) ⟨x, s.2⟩,
← ring_hom.map_mul, to_open_eq_const, to_open_eq_const, const_mul_cancel']
/-- The ring homomorphism that takes a section of the structure sheaf of `R` on the open set `U`,
implemented as a subtype of dependent functions to localizations at prime ideals, and evaluates
the section on the point corresponding to a given prime ideal. -/
def open_to_localization (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : prime_spectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
(structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U) ⟶ CommRing.of (localization.at_prime x.as_ideal) :=
{ to_fun := λ s, (s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ : _),
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ _ _, rfl,
map_zero' := rfl,
map_add' := λ _ _, rfl }
@[simp] lemma coe_open_to_localization (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : prime_spectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
(open_to_localization R U x hx :
(structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U) → localization.at_prime x.as_ideal) =
(λ s, (s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ : _)) :=
rfl
lemma open_to_localization_apply (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : prime_spectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U)
(s : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U)) :
open_to_localization R U x hx s = (s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ : _) :=
rfl
/-- The ring homomorphism from the stalk of the structure sheaf of `R` at a point corresponding to
a prime ideal `p` to the localization of `R` at `p`,
formed by gluing the `open_to_localization` maps. -/
def stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) :
(structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk x ⟶ CommRing.of (localization.at_prime x.as_ideal) :=
limits.colimit.desc (((open_nhds.inclusion x).op) ⋙ (structure_sheaf R).1)
{ X := _,
ι :=
{ app := λ U, open_to_localization R ((open_nhds.inclusion _).obj (unop U)) x (unop U).2, } }
@[simp] lemma germ_comp_stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : U) :
(structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ x ≫ stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x =
open_to_localization R U x x.2 :=
limits.colimit.ι_desc _ _
@[simp] lemma stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom_germ' (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(x : prime_spectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) (s : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U)) :
stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x ((structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ ⟨x, hx⟩ s) = (s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ : _) :=
ring_hom.ext_iff.1 (germ_comp_stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R U ⟨x, hx⟩ : _) s
@[simp] lemma stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom_germ (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (x : U)
(s : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U)) :
stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x ((structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ x s) = s.1 x :=
by { cases x, exact stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom_germ' R U _ _ _ }
@[simp] lemma to_stalk_comp_stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) :
to_stalk R x ≫ stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x = (algebra_map _ _ : R →+* localization _) :=
by { erw [to_stalk, category.assoc, germ_comp_stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom], refl }
@[simp] lemma stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom_to_stalk (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x (to_stalk R x f) = algebra_map _ (localization _) f :=
ring_hom.ext_iff.1 (to_stalk_comp_stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x) _
/-- The ring isomorphism between the stalk of the structure sheaf of `R` at a point `p`
corresponding to a prime ideal in `R` and the localization of `R` at `p`. -/
@[simps] def stalk_iso (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) :
(structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk x ≅ CommRing.of (localization.at_prime x.as_ideal) :=
{ hom := stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x,
inv := localization_to_stalk R x,
hom_inv_id' := (structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk_hom_ext $ λ U hxU,
begin
ext s, simp only [comp_apply], rw [id_apply, stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom_germ'],
obtain ⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, hg, hs⟩ := exists_const _ _ s x hxU,
erw [← res_apply R U V iVU s ⟨x, hxV⟩, ← hs, const_apply, localization_to_stalk_mk'],
refine (structure_sheaf R).presheaf.germ_ext V hxV (hom_of_le hg) iVU _,
erw [← hs, res_const']
end,
inv_hom_id' := @is_localization.ring_hom_ext R _ x.as_ideal.prime_compl
(localization.at_prime x.as_ideal) _ _ (localization.at_prime x.as_ideal) _ _
(ring_hom.comp (stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x) (localization_to_stalk R x))
(ring_hom.id (localization.at_prime _)) $
by { ext f, simp only [ring_hom.comp_apply, ring_hom.id_apply, localization_to_stalk_of,
stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom_to_stalk] } }
instance (x : prime_spectrum R) : is_iso (stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x) :=
is_iso.of_iso (stalk_iso R x)
instance (x : prime_spectrum R) : is_iso (localization_to_stalk R x) :=
is_iso.of_iso (stalk_iso R x).symm
@[simp, reassoc] lemma stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom_localization_to_stalk (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) :
stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x ≫ localization_to_stalk R x = 𝟙 _ :=
(stalk_iso R x).hom_inv_id
@[simp, reassoc] lemma localization_to_stalk_stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom (x : prime_spectrum.Top R) :
localization_to_stalk R x ≫ stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x = 𝟙 _ :=
(stalk_iso R x).inv_hom_id
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting `s ∈ R_f` as a section of the structure sheaf
on the basic open defined by `f ∈ R`. -/
def to_basic_open (f : R) : localization.away f →+*
(structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op $ basic_open f) :=
is_localization.away.lift f (is_unit_to_basic_open_self R f)
@[simp] lemma to_basic_open_mk' (s f : R) (g : submonoid.powers s) :
to_basic_open R s (is_localization.mk' (localization.away s) f g) =
const R f g (basic_open s) (λ x hx, submonoid.powers_subset hx g.2) :=
(is_localization.lift_mk'_spec _ _ _ _).2 $
by rw [to_open_eq_const, to_open_eq_const, const_mul_cancel']
@[simp] lemma localization_to_basic_open (f : R) :
ring_hom.comp (to_basic_open R f) (algebra_map R (localization.away f)) =
to_open R (basic_open f) :=
ring_hom.ext $ λ g,
by rw [to_basic_open, is_localization.away.lift, ring_hom.comp_apply, is_localization.lift_eq]
@[simp] lemma to_basic_open_to_map (s f : R) :
to_basic_open R s (algebra_map R (localization.away s) f) =
const R f 1 (basic_open s) (λ _ _, submonoid.one_mem _) :=
(is_localization.lift_eq _ _).trans $ to_open_eq_const _ _ _
-- The proof here follows the argument in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Proposition II.2.2.
lemma to_basic_open_injective (f : R) : function.injective (to_basic_open R f) :=
begin
intros s t h_eq,
obtain ⟨a, ⟨b, hb⟩, rfl⟩ := is_localization.mk'_surjective (submonoid.powers f) s,
obtain ⟨c, ⟨d, hd⟩, rfl⟩ := is_localization.mk'_surjective (submonoid.powers f) t,
simp only [to_basic_open_mk'] at h_eq,
rw is_localization.eq,
-- We know that the fractions `a/b` and `c/d` are equal as sections of the structure sheaf on
-- `basic_open f`. We need to show that they agree as elements in the localization of `R` at `f`.
-- This amounts showing that `a * d * r = c * b * r`, for some power `r = f ^ n` of `f`.
-- We define `I` as the ideal of *all* elements `r` satisfying the above equation.
let I : ideal R :=
{ carrier := {r : R | a * d * r = c * b * r},
zero_mem' := by simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq, mul_zero],
add_mem' := λ r₁ r₂ hr₁ hr₂, by { dsimp at hr₁ hr₂ ⊢, simp only [mul_add, hr₁, hr₂] },
smul_mem' := λ r₁ r₂ hr₂, by { dsimp at hr₂ ⊢, simp only [mul_comm r₁ r₂, ← mul_assoc, hr₂] }},
-- Our claim now reduces to showing that `f` is contained in the radical of `I`
suffices : f ∈ I.radical,
{ cases this with n hn,
exact ⟨⟨f ^ n, n, rfl⟩, hn⟩ },
rw [← vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical, mem_vanishing_ideal],
intros p hfp,
contrapose hfp,
rw [mem_zero_locus, set.not_subset],
have := congr_fun (congr_arg subtype.val h_eq) ⟨p,hfp⟩,
rw [const_apply, const_apply, is_localization.eq] at this,
cases this with r hr,
exact ⟨r.1, hr, r.2⟩
end
/-
Auxiliary lemma for surjectivity of `to_basic_open`.
Every section can locally be represented on basic opens `basic_opens g` as a fraction `f/g`
-/
lemma locally_const_basic_open (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(s : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : U) :
∃ (f g : R) (i : basic_open g ⟶ U), x.1 ∈ basic_open g ∧
const R f g (basic_open g) (λ y hy, hy) = (structure_sheaf R).1.map i.op s :=
begin
-- First, any section `s` can be represented as a fraction `f/g` on some open neighborhood of `x`
-- and we may pass to a `basic_open h`, since these form a basis
obtain ⟨V, (hxV : x.1 ∈ V.1), iVU, f, g, (hVDg : V ⊆ basic_open g), s_eq⟩ :=
exists_const R U s x.1 x.2,
obtain ⟨_, ⟨h, rfl⟩, hxDh, (hDhV : basic_open h ⊆ V)⟩ :=
is_topological_basis_basic_opens.exists_subset_of_mem_open hxV V.2,
-- The problem is of course, that `g` and `h` don't need to coincide.
-- But, since `basic_open h ≤ basic_open g`, some power of `h` must be a multiple of `g`
cases (basic_open_le_basic_open_iff h g).mp (set.subset.trans hDhV hVDg) with n hn,
-- Actually, we will need a *nonzero* power of `h`.
-- This is because we will need the equality `basic_open (h ^ n) = basic_open h`, which only
-- holds for a nonzero power `n`. We therefore artificially increase `n` by one.
replace hn := ideal.mul_mem_left (ideal.span {g}) h hn,
rw [← pow_succ, ideal.mem_span_singleton'] at hn,
cases hn with c hc,
have basic_opens_eq := basic_open_pow h (n+1) (by linarith),
have i_basic_open := eq_to_hom basic_opens_eq ≫ hom_of_le hDhV,
-- We claim that `(f * c) / h ^ (n+1)` is our desired representation
use [f * c, h ^ (n+1), i_basic_open ≫ iVU, (basic_opens_eq.symm.le : _) hxDh],
rw [op_comp, functor.map_comp, comp_apply, ← s_eq, res_const],
-- Note that the last rewrite here generated an additional goal, which was a parameter
-- of `res_const`. We prove this goal first
swap,
{ intros y hy,
rw basic_opens_eq at hy,
exact (set.subset.trans hDhV hVDg : _) hy },
-- All that is left is a simple calculation
apply const_ext,
rw [mul_assoc f c g, hc],
end
/-
Auxiliary lemma for surjectivity of `to_basic_open`.
A local representation of a section `s` as fractions `a i / h i` on finitely many basic opens
`basic_open (h i)` can be "normalized" in such a way that `a i * h j = h i * a j` for all `i, j`
-/
lemma normalize_finite_fraction_representation (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(s : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U)) {ι : Type*} (t : finset ι) (a h : ι → R)
(iDh : Π i : ι, basic_open (h i) ⟶ U) (h_cover : U.1 ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, (basic_open (h i)).1)
(hs : ∀ i : ι, const R (a i) (h i) (basic_open (h i)) (λ y hy, hy) =
(structure_sheaf R).1.map (iDh i).op s) :
∃ (a' h' : ι → R) (iDh' : Π i : ι, (basic_open (h' i)) ⟶ U),
(U.1 ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, (basic_open (h' i)).1) ∧
(∀ i j ∈ t, a' i * h' j = h' i * a' j) ∧
(∀ i ∈ t, (structure_sheaf R).1.map (iDh' i).op s =
const R (a' i) (h' i) (basic_open (h' i)) (λ y hy, hy)) :=
begin
-- First we show that the fractions `(a i * h j) / (h i * h j)` and `(h i * a j) / (h i * h j)`
-- coincide in the localization of `R` at `h i * h j`
have fractions_eq : ∀ (i j : ι),
is_localization.mk' (localization.away _) (a i * h j) ⟨h i * h j, submonoid.mem_powers _⟩ =
is_localization.mk' _ (h i * a j) ⟨h i * h j, submonoid.mem_powers _⟩,
{ intros i j,
let D := basic_open (h i * h j),
let iDi : D ⟶ basic_open (h i) := hom_of_le (basic_open_mul_le_left _ _),
let iDj : D ⟶ basic_open (h j) := hom_of_le (basic_open_mul_le_right _ _),
-- Crucially, we need injectivity of `to_basic_open`
apply to_basic_open_injective R (h i * h j),
rw [to_basic_open_mk', to_basic_open_mk'],
simp only [set_like.coe_mk],
-- Here, both sides of the equation are equal to a restriction of `s`
transitivity,
convert congr_arg ((structure_sheaf R).1.map iDj.op) (hs j).symm using 1,
convert congr_arg ((structure_sheaf R).1.map iDi.op) (hs i) using 1, swap,
all_goals { rw res_const, apply const_ext, ring },
-- The remaining two goals were generated during the rewrite of `res_const`
-- These can be solved immediately
exacts [basic_open_mul_le_right _ _, basic_open_mul_le_left _ _] },
-- From the equality in the localization, we obtain for each `(i,j)` some power `(h i * h j) ^ n`
-- which equalizes `a i * h j` and `h i * a j`
have exists_power : ∀ (i j : ι), ∃ n : ℕ,
a i * h j * (h i * h j) ^ n = h i * a j * (h i * h j) ^ n,
{ intros i j,
obtain ⟨⟨c, n, rfl⟩, hc⟩ := is_localization.eq.mp (fractions_eq i j),
use (n+1),
rw pow_succ,
dsimp at hc,
convert hc using 1 ; ring },
let n := λ (p : ι × ι), (exists_power p.1 p.2).some,
have n_spec := λ (p : ι × ι), (exists_power p.fst p.snd).some_spec,
-- We need one power `(h i * h j) ^ N` that works for *all* pairs `(i,j)`
-- Since there are only finitely many indices involved, we can pick the supremum.
let N := (t ×ˢ t).sup n,
have basic_opens_eq : ∀ i : ι, basic_open ((h i) ^ (N+1)) = basic_open (h i) :=
λ i, basic_open_pow _ _ (by linarith),
-- Expanding the fraction `a i / h i` by the power `(h i) ^ N` gives the desired normalization
refine ⟨(λ i, a i * (h i) ^ N), (λ i, (h i) ^ (N + 1)),
(λ i, eq_to_hom (basic_opens_eq i) ≫ iDh i), _, _, _⟩,
{ simpa only [basic_opens_eq] using h_cover },
{ intros i hi j hj,
-- Here we need to show that our new fractions `a i / h i` satisfy the normalization condition
-- Of course, the power `N` we used to expand the fractions might be bigger than the power
-- `n (i, j)` which was originally chosen. We denote their difference by `k`
have n_le_N : n (i, j) ≤ N := finset.le_sup (finset.mem_product.mpr ⟨hi, hj⟩),
cases nat.le.dest n_le_N with k hk,
simp only [← hk, pow_add, pow_one],
-- To accommodate for the difference `k`, we multiply both sides of the equation `n_spec (i, j)`
-- by `(h i * h j) ^ k`
convert congr_arg (λ z, z * (h i * h j) ^ k) (n_spec (i, j)) using 1 ;
{ simp only [n, mul_pow], ring } },
-- Lastly, we need to show that the new fractions still represent our original `s`
intros i hi,
rw [op_comp, functor.map_comp, comp_apply, ← hs, res_const],
-- additional goal spit out by `res_const`
swap, exact (basic_opens_eq i).le,
apply const_ext,
rw pow_succ,
ring
end
open_locale classical
open_locale big_operators
-- The proof here follows the argument in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Proposition II.2.2.
lemma to_basic_open_surjective (f : R) : function.surjective (to_basic_open R f) :=
begin
intro s,
-- In this proof, `basic_open f` will play two distinct roles: Firstly, it is an open set in the
-- prime spectrum. Secondly, it is used as an indexing type for various families of objects
-- (open sets, ring elements, ...). In order to make the distinction clear, we introduce a type
-- alias `ι` that is used whenever we want think of it as an indexing type.
let ι : Type u := basic_open f,
-- First, we pick some cover of basic opens, on which we can represent `s` as a fraction
choose a' h' iDh' hxDh' s_eq' using locally_const_basic_open R (basic_open f) s,
-- Since basic opens are compact, we can pass to a finite subcover
obtain ⟨t, ht_cover'⟩ := (is_compact_basic_open f).elim_finite_subcover
(λ (i : ι), (basic_open (h' i)).1) (λ i, is_open_basic_open) (λ x hx, _),
swap,
{ -- Here, we need to show that our basic opens actually form a cover of `basic_open f`
rw set.mem_Union,
exact ⟨⟨x,hx⟩, hxDh' ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ },
-- We use the normalization lemma from above to obtain the relation `a i * h j = h i * a j`
obtain ⟨a, h, iDh, ht_cover, ah_ha, s_eq⟩ := normalize_finite_fraction_representation R
(basic_open f) s t a' h' iDh' ht_cover' s_eq',
clear s_eq' iDh' hxDh' ht_cover' a' h',
-- Next we show that some power of `f` is a linear combination of the `h i`
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : f ∈ (ideal.span (h '' ↑t)).radical,
{ rw [← vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical, zero_locus_span],
simp_rw [subtype.val_eq_coe, basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl] at ht_cover,
rw set.compl_subset_comm at ht_cover, -- Why doesn't `simp_rw` do this?
simp_rw [set.compl_Union, compl_compl, ← zero_locus_Union, ← finset.set_bUnion_coe,
← set.image_eq_Union ] at ht_cover,
apply vanishing_ideal_anti_mono ht_cover,
exact subset_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus {f} (set.mem_singleton f) },
replace hn := ideal.mul_mem_left _ f hn,
erw [←pow_succ, finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total] at hn,
rcases hn with ⟨b, b_supp, hb⟩,
rw finsupp.total_apply_of_mem_supported R b_supp at hb,
dsimp at hb,
-- Finally, we have all the ingredients.
-- We claim that our preimage is given by `(∑ (i : ι) in t, b i * a i) / f ^ (n+1)`
use is_localization.mk' (localization.away f) (∑ (i : ι) in t, b i * a i)
(⟨f ^ (n+1), n+1, rfl⟩ : submonoid.powers _),
rw to_basic_open_mk',
-- Since the structure sheaf is a sheaf, we can show the desired equality locally.
-- Annoyingly, `sheaf.eq_of_locally_eq` requires an open cover indexed by a *type*, so we need to
-- coerce our finset `t` to a type first.
let tt := ((t : set (basic_open f)) : Type u),
apply (structure_sheaf R).eq_of_locally_eq'
(λ i : tt, basic_open (h i)) (basic_open f) (λ i : tt, iDh i),
{ -- This feels a little redundant, since already have `ht_cover` as a hypothesis
-- Unfortunately, `ht_cover` uses a bounded union over the set `t`, while here we have the
-- Union indexed by the type `tt`, so we need some boilerplate to translate one to the other
intros x hx,
erw topological_space.opens.mem_supr,
have := ht_cover hx,
rw [← finset.set_bUnion_coe, set.mem_Union₂] at this,
rcases this with ⟨i, i_mem, x_mem⟩,
use [i, i_mem] },
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩,
dsimp,
change (structure_sheaf R).1.map _ _ = (structure_sheaf R).1.map _ _,
rw [s_eq i hi, res_const],
-- Again, `res_const` spits out an additional goal
swap,
{ intros y hy,
change y ∈ basic_open (f ^ (n+1)),
rw basic_open_pow f (n+1) (by linarith),
exact (le_of_hom (iDh i) : _) hy },
-- The rest of the proof is just computation
apply const_ext,
rw [← hb, finset.sum_mul, finset.mul_sum],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
intros j hj,
rw [mul_assoc, ah_ha j hj i hi],
ring
end
instance is_iso_to_basic_open (f : R) : is_iso (show CommRing.of _ ⟶ _, from to_basic_open R f) :=
begin
haveI : is_iso ((forget CommRing).map (show CommRing.of _ ⟶ _, from to_basic_open R f)) :=
(is_iso_iff_bijective _).mpr ⟨to_basic_open_injective R f, to_basic_open_surjective R f⟩,
exact is_iso_of_reflects_iso _ (forget CommRing),
end
/-- The ring isomorphism between the structure sheaf on `basic_open f` and the localization of `R`
at the submonoid of powers of `f`. -/
def basic_open_iso (f : R) : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op (basic_open f)) ≅
CommRing.of (localization.away f) :=
(as_iso (show CommRing.of _ ⟶ _, from to_basic_open R f)).symm
instance stalk_algebra (p : prime_spectrum R) : algebra R ((structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk p) :=
(to_stalk R p).to_algebra
@[simp] lemma stalk_algebra_map (p : prime_spectrum R) (r : R) :
algebra_map R ((structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk p) r = to_stalk R p r := rfl
/-- Stalk of the structure sheaf at a prime p as localization of R -/
instance is_localization.to_stalk (p : prime_spectrum R) :
is_localization.at_prime ((structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk p) p.as_ideal :=
begin
convert (is_localization.is_localization_iff_of_ring_equiv _ (stalk_iso R p).symm
.CommRing_iso_to_ring_equiv).mp localization.is_localization,
apply algebra.algebra_ext,
intro _,
rw stalk_algebra_map,
congr' 1,
erw iso.eq_comp_inv,
exact to_stalk_comp_stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R p,
end
instance open_algebra (U : (opens (prime_spectrum R))ᵒᵖ) :
algebra R ((structure_sheaf R).val.obj U) :=
(to_open R (unop U)).to_algebra
@[simp] lemma open_algebra_map (U : (opens (prime_spectrum R))ᵒᵖ) (r : R) :
algebra_map R ((structure_sheaf R).val.obj U) r = to_open R (unop U) r := rfl
/-- Sections of the structure sheaf of Spec R on a basic open as localization of R -/
instance is_localization.to_basic_open (r : R) :
is_localization.away r ((structure_sheaf R).val.obj (op $ basic_open r)) :=
begin
convert (is_localization.is_localization_iff_of_ring_equiv _ (basic_open_iso R r).symm
.CommRing_iso_to_ring_equiv).mp localization.is_localization,
apply algebra.algebra_ext,
intro x,
congr' 1,
exact (localization_to_basic_open R r).symm
end
instance to_basic_open_epi (r : R) : epi (to_open R (basic_open r)) :=
⟨λ S f g h, by { refine is_localization.ring_hom_ext _ _,
swap 5, exact is_localization.to_basic_open R r, exact h }⟩
@[elementwise] lemma to_global_factors : to_open R ⊤ =
CommRing.of_hom (algebra_map R (localization.away (1 : R))) ≫ to_basic_open R (1 : R) ≫
(structure_sheaf R).1.map (eq_to_hom (basic_open_one.symm)).op :=
begin
rw ← category.assoc,
change to_open R ⊤ = (to_basic_open R 1).comp _ ≫ _,
unfold CommRing.of_hom,
rw [localization_to_basic_open R, to_open_res],
end
instance is_iso_to_global : is_iso (to_open R ⊤) :=
begin
let hom := CommRing.of_hom (algebra_map R (localization.away (1 : R))),
haveI : is_iso hom := is_iso.of_iso
((is_localization.at_one R (localization.away (1 : R))).to_ring_equiv.to_CommRing_iso),
rw to_global_factors R,
apply_instance
end
/-- The ring isomorphism between the ring `R` and the global sections `Γ(X, 𝒪ₓ)`. -/
@[simps] def global_sections_iso : CommRing.of R ≅ (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op ⊤) :=
as_iso (to_open R ⊤)
@[simp] lemma global_sections_iso_hom (R : CommRing) :
(global_sections_iso R).hom = to_open R ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
lemma to_stalk_stalk_specializes {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
{x y : prime_spectrum R} (h : x ⤳ y) :
to_stalk R y ≫ (structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk_specializes h = to_stalk R x :=
by { dsimp[to_stalk], simpa [-to_open_germ], }
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
lemma localization_to_stalk_stalk_specializes {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
{x y : prime_spectrum R} (h : x ⤳ y) :
structure_sheaf.localization_to_stalk R y ≫ (structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk_specializes h =
CommRing.of_hom (prime_spectrum.localization_map_of_specializes h) ≫
structure_sheaf.localization_to_stalk R x :=
begin
apply is_localization.ring_hom_ext y.as_ideal.prime_compl,
any_goals { dsimp, apply_instance },
erw ring_hom.comp_assoc,
conv_rhs { erw ring_hom.comp_assoc },
dsimp [CommRing.of_hom, localization_to_stalk, prime_spectrum.localization_map_of_specializes],
rw [is_localization.lift_comp, is_localization.lift_comp, is_localization.lift_comp],
exact to_stalk_stalk_specializes h
end
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
lemma stalk_specializes_stalk_to_fiber {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
{x y : prime_spectrum R} (h : x ⤳ y) :
(structure_sheaf R).presheaf.stalk_specializes h ≫ structure_sheaf.stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R x =
structure_sheaf.stalk_to_fiber_ring_hom R y ≫
prime_spectrum.localization_map_of_specializes h :=
begin
change _ ≫ (structure_sheaf.stalk_iso R x).hom = (structure_sheaf.stalk_iso R y).hom ≫ _,
rw [← iso.eq_comp_inv, category.assoc, ← iso.inv_comp_eq],
exact localization_to_stalk_stalk_specializes h,
end
section comap
variables {R} {S : Type u} [comm_ring S] {P : Type u} [comm_ring P]
/--
Given a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S`, an open set `U` of the prime spectrum of `R` and an open
set `V` of the prime spectrum of `S`, such that `V ⊆ (comap f) ⁻¹' U`, we can push a section `s`
on `U` to a section on `V`, by composing with `localization.local_ring_hom _ _ f` from the left and
`comap f` from the right. Explicitly, if `s` evaluates on `comap f p` to `a / b`, its image on `V`
evaluates on `p` to `f(a) / f(b)`.
At the moment, we work with arbitrary dependent functions `s : Π x : U, localizations R x`. Below,
we prove the predicate `is_locally_fraction` is preserved by this map, hence it can be extended to
a morphism between the structure sheaves of `R` and `S`.
-/
def comap_fun (f : R →+* S) (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top S)) (hUV : V.1 ⊆ (prime_spectrum.comap f) ⁻¹' U.1)
(s : Π x : U, localizations R x) (y : V) : localizations S y :=
localization.local_ring_hom (prime_spectrum.comap f y.1).as_ideal _ f rfl
(s ⟨(prime_spectrum.comap f y.1), hUV y.2⟩ : _)
lemma comap_fun_is_locally_fraction (f : R →+* S)
(U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top S))
(hUV : V.1 ⊆ (prime_spectrum.comap f) ⁻¹' U.1) (s : Π x : U, localizations R x)
(hs : (is_locally_fraction R).to_prelocal_predicate.pred s) :
(is_locally_fraction S).to_prelocal_predicate.pred (comap_fun f U V hUV s) :=
begin
rintro ⟨p, hpV⟩,
-- Since `s` is locally fraction, we can find a neighborhood `W` of `prime_spectrum.comap f p`
-- in `U`, such that `s = a / b` on `W`, for some ring elements `a, b : R`.
rcases hs ⟨prime_spectrum.comap f p, hUV hpV⟩ with ⟨W, m, iWU, a, b, h_frac⟩,
-- We claim that we can write our new section as the fraction `f a / f b` on the neighborhood
-- `(comap f) ⁻¹ W ⊓ V` of `p`.
refine ⟨opens.comap (comap f) W ⊓ V, ⟨m, hpV⟩, opens.inf_le_right _ _, f a, f b, _⟩,
rintro ⟨q, ⟨hqW, hqV⟩⟩,
specialize h_frac ⟨prime_spectrum.comap f q, hqW⟩,
refine ⟨h_frac.1, _⟩,
dsimp only [comap_fun],
erw [← localization.local_ring_hom_to_map ((prime_spectrum.comap f q).as_ideal),
← ring_hom.map_mul, h_frac.2, localization.local_ring_hom_to_map],
refl,
end
/--
For a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S` and open sets `U` and `V` of the prime spectra of `R` and
`S` such that `V ⊆ (comap f) ⁻¹ U`, the induced ring homomorphism from the structure sheaf of `R`
at `U` to the structure sheaf of `S` at `V`.
Explicitly, this map is given as follows: For a point `p : V`, if the section `s` evaluates on `p`
to the fraction `a / b`, its image on `V` evaluates on `p` to the fraction `f(a) / f(b)`.
-/
def comap (f : R →+* S) (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top S)) (hUV : V.1 ⊆ (prime_spectrum.comap f) ⁻¹' U.1) :
(structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U) →+* (structure_sheaf S).1.obj (op V) :=
{ to_fun := λ s, ⟨comap_fun f U V hUV s.1, comap_fun_is_locally_fraction f U V hUV s.1 s.2⟩,
map_one' := subtype.ext $ funext $ λ p, by
{ rw [subtype.coe_mk, subtype.val_eq_coe, comap_fun, (sections_subring R (op U)).coe_one,
pi.one_apply, ring_hom.map_one], refl },
map_zero' := subtype.ext $ funext $ λ p, by
{ rw [subtype.coe_mk, subtype.val_eq_coe, comap_fun, (sections_subring R (op U)).coe_zero,
pi.zero_apply, ring_hom.map_zero], refl },
map_add' := λ s t, subtype.ext $ funext $ λ p, by
{ rw [subtype.coe_mk, subtype.val_eq_coe, comap_fun, (sections_subring R (op U)).coe_add,
pi.add_apply, ring_hom.map_add], refl },
map_mul' := λ s t, subtype.ext $ funext $ λ p, by
{ rw [subtype.coe_mk, subtype.val_eq_coe, comap_fun, (sections_subring R (op U)).coe_mul,
pi.mul_apply, ring_hom.map_mul], refl } }
@[simp]
lemma comap_apply (f : R →+* S) (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top S)) (hUV : V.1 ⊆ (prime_spectrum.comap f) ⁻¹' U.1)
(s : (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (p : V) :
(comap f U V hUV s).1 p =
localization.local_ring_hom (prime_spectrum.comap f p.1).as_ideal _ f rfl
(s.1 ⟨(prime_spectrum.comap f p.1), hUV p.2⟩ : _) :=
rfl
lemma comap_const (f : R →+* S) (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top S)) (hUV : V.1 ⊆ (prime_spectrum.comap f) ⁻¹' U.1)
(a b : R) (hb : ∀ x : prime_spectrum R, x ∈ U → b ∈ x.as_ideal.prime_compl) :
comap f U V hUV (const R a b U hb) =
const S (f a) (f b) V (λ p hpV, hb (prime_spectrum.comap f p) (hUV hpV)) :=
subtype.eq $ funext $ λ p,
begin
rw [comap_apply, const_apply, const_apply],
erw localization.local_ring_hom_mk',
refl,
end
/--
For an inclusion `i : V ⟶ U` between open sets of the prime spectrum of `R`, the comap of the
identity from OO_X(U) to OO_X(V) equals as the restriction map of the structure sheaf.
This is a generalization of the fact that, for fixed `U`, the comap of the identity from OO_X(U)
to OO_X(U) is the identity.
-/
lemma comap_id_eq_map (U V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (iVU : V ⟶ U) :
comap (ring_hom.id R) U V
(λ p hpV, le_of_hom iVU $ by rwa prime_spectrum.comap_id) =
(structure_sheaf R).1.map iVU.op :=
ring_hom.ext $ λ s, subtype.eq $ funext $ λ p,
begin
rw comap_apply,
-- Unfortunately, we cannot use `localization.local_ring_hom_id` here, because
-- `prime_spectrum.comap (ring_hom.id R) p` is not *definitionally* equal to `p`. Instead, we use
-- that we can write `s` as a fraction `a/b` in a small neighborhood around `p`. Since
-- `prime_spectrum.comap (ring_hom.id R) p` equals `p`, it is also contained in the same
-- neighborhood, hence `s` equals `a/b` there too.
obtain ⟨W, hpW, iWU, h⟩ := s.2 (iVU p),
obtain ⟨a, b, h'⟩ := h.eq_mk',
obtain ⟨hb₁, s_eq₁⟩ := h' ⟨p, hpW⟩,
obtain ⟨hb₂, s_eq₂⟩ := h' ⟨prime_spectrum.comap (ring_hom.id _) p.1,
by rwa prime_spectrum.comap_id⟩,
dsimp only at s_eq₁ s_eq₂,
erw [s_eq₂, localization.local_ring_hom_mk', ← s_eq₁, ← res_apply],
end
/--
The comap of the identity is the identity. In this variant of the lemma, two open subsets `U` and
`V` are given as arguments, together with a proof that `U = V`. This is be useful when `U` and `V`
are not definitionally equal.
-/
lemma comap_id (U V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) (hUV : U = V) :
comap (ring_hom.id R) U V (λ p hpV, by rwa [hUV, prime_spectrum.comap_id]) =
eq_to_hom (show (structure_sheaf R).1.obj (op U) = _, by rw hUV) :=
by erw [comap_id_eq_map U V (eq_to_hom hUV.symm), eq_to_hom_op, eq_to_hom_map]
@[simp] lemma comap_id' (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) :
comap (ring_hom.id R) U U (λ p hpU, by rwa prime_spectrum.comap_id) =
ring_hom.id _ :=
by { rw comap_id U U rfl, refl }
lemma comap_comp (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* P) (U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R))
(V : opens (prime_spectrum.Top S)) (W : opens (prime_spectrum.Top P))
(hUV : ∀ p ∈ V, prime_spectrum.comap f p ∈ U) (hVW : ∀ p ∈ W, prime_spectrum.comap g p ∈ V) :
comap (g.comp f) U W (λ p hpW, hUV (prime_spectrum.comap g p) (hVW p hpW)) =
(comap g V W hVW).comp (comap f U V hUV) :=
ring_hom.ext $ λ s, subtype.eq $ funext $ λ p,
begin
rw comap_apply,
erw localization.local_ring_hom_comp _ (prime_spectrum.comap g p.1).as_ideal,
-- refl works here, because `prime_spectrum.comap (g.comp f) p` is defeq to
-- `prime_spectrum.comap f (prime_spectrum.comap g p)`
refl,
end
@[elementwise, reassoc] lemma to_open_comp_comap (f : R →+* S)
(U : opens (prime_spectrum.Top R)) :
to_open R U ≫ comap f U (opens.comap (prime_spectrum.comap f) U) (λ _, id) =
CommRing.of_hom f ≫ to_open S _ :=
ring_hom.ext $ λ s, subtype.eq $ funext $ λ p,
begin
simp_rw [comp_apply, comap_apply, subtype.val_eq_coe],
erw localization.local_ring_hom_to_map,
refl,
end
end comap
end structure_sheaf
end algebraic_geometry
|
4c28387bd1875928b6c253cd517e30e28e0d5a43 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/data/int/lemmas.lean | f3192a3f8d9715697d2f38020abd23bb22d0d427 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,376 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import data.set.function
import data.int.order.lemmas
import data.int.bitwise
import data.nat.cast.basic
import data.nat.order.lemmas
/-!
# Miscellaneous lemmas about the integers
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file contains lemmas about integers, which require further imports than
`data.int.basic` or `data.int.order`.
-/
open nat
namespace int
lemma le_coe_nat_sub (m n : ℕ) :
(m - n : ℤ) ≤ ↑(m - n : ℕ) :=
begin
by_cases h: m ≥ n,
{ exact le_of_eq (int.coe_nat_sub h).symm },
{ simp [le_of_not_ge h, coe_nat_le] }
end
/-! ### succ and pred -/
@[simp] lemma succ_coe_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n : ℤ) + 1 :=
lt_add_one_iff.mpr (by simp)
/-! ### nat abs -/
variables {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ}
lemma nat_abs_eq_iff_sq_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs = b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [sq, sq], exact nat_abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq }
lemma nat_abs_lt_iff_sq_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs < b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [sq, sq], exact nat_abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt }
lemma nat_abs_le_iff_sq_le {a b : ℤ} : a.nat_abs ≤ b.nat_abs ↔ a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
by { rw [sq, sq], exact nat_abs_le_iff_mul_self_le }
lemma nat_abs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
nat_abs a = nat_abs b ↔ a = b :=
by rw [←sq_eq_sq ha hb, ←nat_abs_eq_iff_sq_eq]
lemma nat_abs_inj_of_nonpos_of_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) :
nat_abs a = nat_abs b ↔ a = b :=
by simpa only [int.nat_abs_neg, neg_inj]
using nat_abs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg
(neg_nonneg_of_nonpos ha) (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hb)
lemma nat_abs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) :
nat_abs a = nat_abs b ↔ a = -b :=
by simpa only [int.nat_abs_neg]
using nat_abs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg ha (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hb)
lemma nat_abs_inj_of_nonpos_of_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
nat_abs a = nat_abs b ↔ -a = b :=
by simpa only [int.nat_abs_neg]
using nat_abs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos ha) hb
section intervals
open set
lemma strict_mono_on_nat_abs : strict_mono_on nat_abs (Ici 0) :=
λ a ha b hb hab, nat_abs_lt_nat_abs_of_nonneg_of_lt ha hab
lemma strict_anti_on_nat_abs : strict_anti_on nat_abs (Iic 0) :=
λ a ha b hb hab, by simpa [int.nat_abs_neg]
using nat_abs_lt_nat_abs_of_nonneg_of_lt (right.nonneg_neg_iff.mpr hb) (neg_lt_neg_iff.mpr hab)
lemma inj_on_nat_abs_Ici : inj_on nat_abs (Ici 0) := strict_mono_on_nat_abs.inj_on
lemma inj_on_nat_abs_Iic : inj_on nat_abs (Iic 0) := strict_anti_on_nat_abs.inj_on
end intervals
/-! ### to_nat -/
lemma to_nat_of_nonpos : ∀ {z : ℤ}, z ≤ 0 → z.to_nat = 0
| 0 _ := rfl
| (n + 1 : ℕ) h := (h.not_lt (by simp)).elim
| -[1+ n] _ := rfl
/-! ### bitwise ops
This lemma is orphaned from `data.int.bitwise` as it also requires material from `data.int.order`.
-/
local attribute [simp] int.zero_div
@[simp] lemma div2_bit (b n) : div2 (bit b n) = n :=
begin
rw [bit_val, div2_val, add_comm, int.add_mul_div_left, (_ : (_/2:ℤ) = 0), zero_add],
cases b,
{ simp },
{ show of_nat _ = _, rw nat.div_eq_zero; simp },
{ cc }
end
end int
|
88c84a20265360d856013a974d7837b146be922c | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/field_theory/normal.lean | 4a1e33c1053b4fd1625f6aae261a0155ebb9298b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,444 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import field_theory.adjoin
import field_theory.tower
import group_theory.solvable
import ring_theory.power_basis
/-!
# Normal field extensions
In this file we define normal field extensions and prove that for a finite extension, being normal
is the same as being a splitting field (`normal.of_is_splitting_field` and
`normal.exists_is_splitting_field`).
## Main Definitions
- `normal F K` where `K` is a field extension of `F`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators
open_locale classical polynomial
open polynomial is_scalar_tower
variables (F K : Type*) [field F] [field K] [algebra F K]
--TODO(Commelin): refactor normal to extend `is_algebraic`??
/-- Typeclass for normal field extension: `K` is a normal extension of `F` iff the minimal
polynomial of every element `x` in `K` splits in `K`, i.e. every conjugate of `x` is in `K`. -/
class normal : Prop :=
(is_integral' (x : K) : is_integral F x)
(splits' (x : K) : splits (algebra_map F K) (minpoly F x))
variables {F K}
theorem normal.is_integral (h : normal F K) (x : K) : is_integral F x := normal.is_integral' x
theorem normal.splits (h : normal F K) (x : K) :
splits (algebra_map F K) (minpoly F x) := normal.splits' x
theorem normal_iff : normal F K ↔
∀ x : K, is_integral F x ∧ splits (algebra_map F K) (minpoly F x) :=
⟨λ h x, ⟨h.is_integral x, h.splits x⟩, λ h, ⟨λ x, (h x).1, λ x, (h x).2⟩⟩
theorem normal.out : normal F K →
∀ x : K, is_integral F x ∧ splits (algebra_map F K) (minpoly F x) := normal_iff.1
variables (F K)
instance normal_self : normal F F :=
⟨λ x, is_integral_algebra_map, λ x, by { rw minpoly.eq_X_sub_C', exact splits_X_sub_C _ }⟩
variables {K}
variables (K)
theorem normal.exists_is_splitting_field [h : normal F K] [finite_dimensional F K] :
∃ p : F[X], is_splitting_field F K p :=
begin
let s := basis.of_vector_space F K,
refine ⟨∏ x, minpoly F (s x),
splits_prod _ $ λ x hx, h.splits (s x),
subalgebra.to_submodule_injective _⟩,
rw [algebra.top_to_submodule, eq_top_iff, ← s.span_eq, submodule.span_le, set.range_subset_iff],
refine λ x, algebra.subset_adjoin (multiset.mem_to_finset.mpr $
(mem_roots $ mt (map_eq_zero $ algebra_map F K).1 $
finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.2 $ λ x hx, _).2 _),
{ exact minpoly.ne_zero (h.is_integral (s x)) },
rw [is_root.def, eval_map, ← aeval_def, alg_hom.map_prod],
exact finset.prod_eq_zero (finset.mem_univ _) (minpoly.aeval _ _)
end
section normal_tower
variables (E : Type*) [field E] [algebra F E] [algebra K E] [is_scalar_tower F K E]
lemma normal.tower_top_of_normal [h : normal F E] : normal K E :=
normal_iff.2 $ λ x, begin
cases h.out x with hx hhx,
rw algebra_map_eq F K E at hhx,
exact ⟨is_integral_of_is_scalar_tower x hx, polynomial.splits_of_splits_of_dvd (algebra_map K E)
(polynomial.map_ne_zero (minpoly.ne_zero hx))
((polynomial.splits_map_iff (algebra_map F K) (algebra_map K E)).mpr hhx)
(minpoly.dvd_map_of_is_scalar_tower F K x)⟩,
end
lemma alg_hom.normal_bijective [h : normal F E] (ϕ : E →ₐ[F] K) : function.bijective ϕ :=
⟨ϕ.to_ring_hom.injective, λ x, by
{ letI : algebra E K := ϕ.to_ring_hom.to_algebra,
obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := h.out (algebra_map K E x),
cases minpoly.mem_range_of_degree_eq_one E x (or.resolve_left h2 (minpoly.ne_zero h1)
(minpoly.irreducible (is_integral_of_is_scalar_tower x
((is_integral_algebra_map_iff (algebra_map K E).injective).mp h1)))
(minpoly.dvd E x ((algebra_map K E).injective (by
{ rw [ring_hom.map_zero, aeval_map, ←is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom_apply F K E,
←alg_hom.comp_apply, ←aeval_alg_hom],
exact minpoly.aeval F (algebra_map K E x) })))) with y hy,
exact ⟨y, hy⟩ }⟩
variables {F} {E} {E' : Type*} [field E'] [algebra F E']
lemma normal.of_alg_equiv [h : normal F E] (f : E ≃ₐ[F] E') : normal F E' :=
normal_iff.2 $ λ x, begin
cases h.out (f.symm x) with hx hhx,
have H := is_integral_alg_hom f.to_alg_hom hx,
rw [alg_equiv.to_alg_hom_eq_coe, alg_equiv.coe_alg_hom, alg_equiv.apply_symm_apply] at H,
use H,
apply polynomial.splits_of_splits_of_dvd (algebra_map F E') (minpoly.ne_zero hx),
{ rw ← alg_hom.comp_algebra_map f.to_alg_hom,
exact polynomial.splits_comp_of_splits (algebra_map F E) f.to_alg_hom.to_ring_hom hhx },
{ apply minpoly.dvd _ _,
rw ← add_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff f.symm.to_add_equiv,
exact eq.trans (polynomial.aeval_alg_hom_apply f.symm.to_alg_hom x
(minpoly F (f.symm x))).symm (minpoly.aeval _ _) },
end
lemma alg_equiv.transfer_normal (f : E ≃ₐ[F] E') : normal F E ↔ normal F E' :=
⟨λ h, by exactI normal.of_alg_equiv f, λ h, by exactI normal.of_alg_equiv f.symm⟩
lemma normal.of_is_splitting_field (p : F[X]) [hFEp : is_splitting_field F E p] :
normal F E :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ haveI : is_splitting_field F F p, { rw hp, exact ⟨splits_zero _, subsingleton.elim _ _⟩ },
exactI (alg_equiv.transfer_normal ((is_splitting_field.alg_equiv F p).trans
(is_splitting_field.alg_equiv E p).symm)).mp (normal_self F) },
refine normal_iff.2 (λ x, _),
haveI hFE : finite_dimensional F E := is_splitting_field.finite_dimensional E p,
have Hx : is_integral F x := is_integral_of_noetherian (is_noetherian.iff_fg.2 hFE) x,
refine ⟨Hx, or.inr _⟩,
rintros q q_irred ⟨r, hr⟩,
let D := adjoin_root q,
let pbED := adjoin_root.power_basis q_irred.ne_zero,
haveI : finite_dimensional E D := power_basis.finite_dimensional pbED,
have finrankED : finite_dimensional.finrank E D = q.nat_degree := power_basis.finrank pbED,
letI : algebra F D := ring_hom.to_algebra ((algebra_map E D).comp (algebra_map F E)),
haveI : is_scalar_tower F E D := of_algebra_map_eq (λ _, rfl),
haveI : finite_dimensional F D := finite_dimensional.trans F E D,
suffices : nonempty (D →ₐ[F] E),
{ cases this with ϕ,
rw [←with_bot.coe_one, degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq q_irred.ne_zero, ←finrankED],
have nat_lemma : ∀ a b c : ℕ, a * b = c → c ≤ a → 0 < c → b = 1,
{ intros a b c h1 h2 h3, nlinarith },
exact nat_lemma _ _ _ (finite_dimensional.finrank_mul_finrank F E D)
(linear_map.finrank_le_finrank_of_injective (show function.injective ϕ.to_linear_map,
from ϕ.to_ring_hom.injective)) finite_dimensional.finrank_pos, },
let C := adjoin_root (minpoly F x),
have Hx_irred := minpoly.irreducible Hx,
letI : algebra C D := ring_hom.to_algebra (adjoin_root.lift
(algebra_map F D) (adjoin_root.root q) (by rw [algebra_map_eq F E D, ←eval₂_map, hr,
adjoin_root.algebra_map_eq, eval₂_mul, adjoin_root.eval₂_root, zero_mul])),
letI : algebra C E := ring_hom.to_algebra (adjoin_root.lift
(algebra_map F E) x (minpoly.aeval F x)),
haveI : is_scalar_tower F C D := of_algebra_map_eq (λ x, (adjoin_root.lift_of _).symm),
haveI : is_scalar_tower F C E := of_algebra_map_eq (λ x, (adjoin_root.lift_of _).symm),
suffices : nonempty (D →ₐ[C] E),
{ exact nonempty.map (alg_hom.restrict_scalars F) this },
let S : set D := ((p.map (algebra_map F E)).roots.map (algebra_map E D)).to_finset,
suffices : ⊤ ≤ intermediate_field.adjoin C S,
{ refine intermediate_field.alg_hom_mk_adjoin_splits' (top_le_iff.mp this) (λ y hy, _),
rcases multiset.mem_map.mp (multiset.mem_to_finset.mp hy) with ⟨z, hz1, hz2⟩,
have Hz : is_integral F z := is_integral_of_noetherian (is_noetherian.iff_fg.2 hFE) z,
use (show is_integral C y, from is_integral_of_noetherian
(is_noetherian.iff_fg.2 (finite_dimensional.right F C D)) y),
apply splits_of_splits_of_dvd (algebra_map C E) (map_ne_zero (minpoly.ne_zero Hz)),
{ rw [splits_map_iff, ←algebra_map_eq F C E],
exact splits_of_splits_of_dvd _ hp hFEp.splits (minpoly.dvd F z
(eq.trans (eval₂_eq_eval_map _) ((mem_roots (map_ne_zero hp)).mp hz1))) },
{ apply minpoly.dvd,
rw [←hz2, aeval_def, eval₂_map, ←algebra_map_eq F C D, algebra_map_eq F E D, ←hom_eval₂,
←aeval_def, minpoly.aeval F z, ring_hom.map_zero] } },
rw [←intermediate_field.to_subalgebra_le_to_subalgebra, intermediate_field.top_to_subalgebra],
apply ge_trans (intermediate_field.algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin C S),
suffices : (algebra.adjoin C S).restrict_scalars F
= (algebra.adjoin E {adjoin_root.root q}).restrict_scalars F,
{ rw [adjoin_root.adjoin_root_eq_top, subalgebra.restrict_scalars_top,
←@subalgebra.restrict_scalars_top F C] at this,
exact top_le_iff.mpr (subalgebra.restrict_scalars_injective F this) },
dsimp only [S],
rw [←finset.image_to_finset, finset.coe_image],
apply eq.trans (algebra.adjoin_res_eq_adjoin_res F E C D
hFEp.adjoin_roots adjoin_root.adjoin_root_eq_top),
rw [set.image_singleton, ring_hom.algebra_map_to_algebra, adjoin_root.lift_root]
end
instance (p : F[X]) : normal F p.splitting_field := normal.of_is_splitting_field p
end normal_tower
variables {F} {K} (ϕ ψ : K →ₐ[F] K) (χ ω : K ≃ₐ[F] K)
section restrict
variables (E : Type*) [field E] [algebra F E] [algebra E K] [is_scalar_tower F E K]
/-- Restrict algebra homomorphism to image of normal subfield -/
def alg_hom.restrict_normal_aux [h : normal F E] :
(to_alg_hom F E K).range →ₐ[F] (to_alg_hom F E K).range :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨ϕ x, by
{ suffices : (to_alg_hom F E K).range.map ϕ ≤ _,
{ exact this ⟨x, subtype.mem x, rfl⟩ },
rintros x ⟨y, ⟨z, hy⟩, hx⟩,
rw [←hx, ←hy],
apply minpoly.mem_range_of_degree_eq_one E,
exact or.resolve_left (h.splits z) (minpoly.ne_zero (h.is_integral z))
(minpoly.irreducible $ is_integral_of_is_scalar_tower _ $
is_integral_alg_hom ϕ $ is_integral_alg_hom _ $ h.is_integral z)
(minpoly.dvd E _ $ by rw [aeval_map, aeval_alg_hom, aeval_alg_hom, alg_hom.comp_apply,
alg_hom.comp_apply, minpoly.aeval, alg_hom.map_zero, alg_hom.map_zero]) }⟩,
map_zero' := subtype.ext ϕ.map_zero,
map_one' := subtype.ext ϕ.map_one,
map_add' := λ x y, subtype.ext (ϕ.map_add x y),
map_mul' := λ x y, subtype.ext (ϕ.map_mul x y),
commutes' := λ x, subtype.ext (ϕ.commutes x) }
/-- Restrict algebra homomorphism to normal subfield -/
def alg_hom.restrict_normal [normal F E] : E →ₐ[F] E :=
((alg_equiv.of_injective_field (is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom F E K)).symm.to_alg_hom.comp
(ϕ.restrict_normal_aux E)).comp
(alg_equiv.of_injective_field (is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom F E K)).to_alg_hom
@[simp] lemma alg_hom.restrict_normal_commutes [normal F E] (x : E) :
algebra_map E K (ϕ.restrict_normal E x) = ϕ (algebra_map E K x) :=
subtype.ext_iff.mp (alg_equiv.apply_symm_apply (alg_equiv.of_injective_field
(is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom F E K)) (ϕ.restrict_normal_aux E
⟨is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom F E K x, x, rfl⟩))
lemma alg_hom.restrict_normal_comp [normal F E] :
(ϕ.restrict_normal E).comp (ψ.restrict_normal E) = (ϕ.comp ψ).restrict_normal E :=
alg_hom.ext (λ _, (algebra_map E K).injective
(by simp only [alg_hom.comp_apply, alg_hom.restrict_normal_commutes]))
/-- Restrict algebra isomorphism to a normal subfield -/
def alg_equiv.restrict_normal [h : normal F E] : E ≃ₐ[F] E :=
alg_equiv.of_bijective (χ.to_alg_hom.restrict_normal E) (alg_hom.normal_bijective F E E _)
@[simp] lemma alg_equiv.restrict_normal_commutes [normal F E] (x : E) :
algebra_map E K (χ.restrict_normal E x) = χ (algebra_map E K x) :=
χ.to_alg_hom.restrict_normal_commutes E x
lemma alg_equiv.restrict_normal_trans [normal F E] :
(χ.trans ω).restrict_normal E = (χ.restrict_normal E).trans (ω.restrict_normal E) :=
alg_equiv.ext (λ _, (algebra_map E K).injective
(by simp only [alg_equiv.trans_apply, alg_equiv.restrict_normal_commutes]))
/-- Restriction to an normal subfield as a group homomorphism -/
def alg_equiv.restrict_normal_hom [normal F E] : (K ≃ₐ[F] K) →* (E ≃ₐ[F] E) :=
monoid_hom.mk' (λ χ, χ.restrict_normal E) (λ ω χ, (χ.restrict_normal_trans ω E))
end restrict
section lift
variables {F} {K} (E : Type*) [field E] [algebra F E] [algebra K E] [is_scalar_tower F K E]
/-- If `E/K/F` is a tower of fields with `E/F` normal then we can lift
an algebra homomorphism `ϕ : K →ₐ[F] K` to `ϕ.lift_normal E : E →ₐ[F] E`. -/
noncomputable def alg_hom.lift_normal [h : normal F E] : E →ₐ[F] E :=
@alg_hom.restrict_scalars F K E E _ _ _ _ _ _
((is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom F K E).comp ϕ).to_ring_hom.to_algebra _ _ _ _ $ nonempty.some $
@intermediate_field.alg_hom_mk_adjoin_splits' _ _ _ _ _ _ _
((is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom F K E).comp ϕ).to_ring_hom.to_algebra _
(intermediate_field.adjoin_univ _ _)
(λ x hx, ⟨is_integral_of_is_scalar_tower x (h.out x).1,
splits_of_splits_of_dvd _ (map_ne_zero (minpoly.ne_zero (h.out x).1))
(by { rw [splits_map_iff, ←is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq], exact (h.out x).2 })
(minpoly.dvd_map_of_is_scalar_tower F K x)⟩)
@[simp] lemma alg_hom.lift_normal_commutes [normal F E] (x : K) :
ϕ.lift_normal E (algebra_map K E x) = algebra_map K E (ϕ x) :=
@alg_hom.commutes K E E _ _ _ _
((is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom F K E).comp ϕ).to_ring_hom.to_algebra _ x
@[simp] lemma alg_hom.restrict_lift_normal [normal F K] [normal F E] :
(ϕ.lift_normal E).restrict_normal K = ϕ :=
alg_hom.ext (λ x, (algebra_map K E).injective
(eq.trans (alg_hom.restrict_normal_commutes _ K x) (ϕ.lift_normal_commutes E x)))
/-- If `E/K/F` is a tower of fields with `E/F` normal then we can lift
an algebra isomorphism `ϕ : K ≃ₐ[F] K` to `ϕ.lift_normal E : E ≃ₐ[F] E`. -/
noncomputable def alg_equiv.lift_normal [normal F E] : E ≃ₐ[F] E :=
alg_equiv.of_bijective (χ.to_alg_hom.lift_normal E) (alg_hom.normal_bijective F E E _)
@[simp] lemma alg_equiv.lift_normal_commutes [normal F E] (x : K) :
χ.lift_normal E (algebra_map K E x) = algebra_map K E (χ x) :=
χ.to_alg_hom.lift_normal_commutes E x
@[simp] lemma alg_equiv.restrict_lift_normal [normal F K] [normal F E] :
(χ.lift_normal E).restrict_normal K = χ :=
alg_equiv.ext (λ x, (algebra_map K E).injective
(eq.trans (alg_equiv.restrict_normal_commutes _ K x) (χ.lift_normal_commutes E x)))
lemma alg_equiv.restrict_normal_hom_surjective [normal F K] [normal F E] :
function.surjective (alg_equiv.restrict_normal_hom K : (E ≃ₐ[F] E) → (K ≃ₐ[F] K)) :=
λ χ, ⟨χ.lift_normal E, χ.restrict_lift_normal E⟩
variables (F) (K) (E)
lemma is_solvable_of_is_scalar_tower [normal F K] [h1 : is_solvable (K ≃ₐ[F] K)]
[h2 : is_solvable (E ≃ₐ[K] E)] : is_solvable (E ≃ₐ[F] E) :=
begin
let f : (E ≃ₐ[K] E) →* (E ≃ₐ[F] E) :=
{ to_fun := λ ϕ, alg_equiv.of_alg_hom (ϕ.to_alg_hom.restrict_scalars F)
(ϕ.symm.to_alg_hom.restrict_scalars F)
(alg_hom.ext (λ x, ϕ.apply_symm_apply x))
(alg_hom.ext (λ x, ϕ.symm_apply_apply x)),
map_one' := alg_equiv.ext (λ _, rfl),
map_mul' := λ _ _, alg_equiv.ext (λ _, rfl) },
refine solvable_of_ker_le_range f (alg_equiv.restrict_normal_hom K)
(λ ϕ hϕ, ⟨{commutes' := λ x, _, .. ϕ}, alg_equiv.ext (λ _, rfl)⟩),
exact (eq.trans (ϕ.restrict_normal_commutes K x).symm (congr_arg _ (alg_equiv.ext_iff.mp hϕ x))),
end
end lift
|
a86859a2b28b0adb73a8a7d248d13ca5f212d8a2 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/data/equiv/mul_add.lean | 6bfab29a1a691592bff2f0089fc28a3c4b137095 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,992 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Callum Sutton, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.equiv.basic
import deprecated.group
/-!
# Multiplicative and additive equivs
In this file we define two extensions of `equiv` called `add_equiv` and `mul_equiv`, which are
datatypes representing isomorphisms of `add_monoid`s/`add_group`s and `monoid`s/`group`s. We also
introduce the corresponding groups of automorphisms `add_aut` and `mul_aut`.
## Notations
The extended equivs all have coercions to functions, and the coercions are the canonical
notation when treating the isomorphisms as maps.
## Implementation notes
The fields for `mul_equiv`, `add_equiv` now avoid the unbundled `is_mul_hom` and `is_add_hom`, as
these are deprecated.
Definition of multiplication in the groups of automorphisms agrees with function composition,
multiplication in `equiv.perm`, and multiplication in `category_theory.End`, not with
`category_theory.comp`.
## Tags
equiv, mul_equiv, add_equiv, mul_aut, add_aut
-/
variables {A : Type*} {B : Type*} {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*} {G : Type*} {H : Type*}
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- add_equiv α β is the type of an equiv α ≃ β which preserves addition. -/
structure add_equiv (A B : Type*) [has_add A] [has_add B] extends A ≃ B :=
(map_add' : ∀ x y : A, to_fun (x + y) = to_fun x + to_fun y)
/-- `mul_equiv α β` is the type of an equiv `α ≃ β` which preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive]
structure mul_equiv (M N : Type*) [has_mul M] [has_mul N] extends M ≃ N :=
(map_mul' : ∀ x y : M, to_fun (x * y) = to_fun x * to_fun y)
infix ` ≃* `:25 := mul_equiv
infix ` ≃+ `:25 := add_equiv
namespace mul_equiv
@[to_additive]
instance [has_mul M] [has_mul N] : has_coe_to_fun (M ≃* N) := ⟨_, mul_equiv.to_fun⟩
variables [has_mul M] [has_mul N] [has_mul P]
/-- A multiplicative isomorphism preserves multiplication (canonical form). -/
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul (f : M ≃* N) : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y := f.map_mul'
/-- A multiplicative isomorphism preserves multiplication (deprecated). -/
@[to_additive]
instance (h : M ≃* N) : is_mul_hom h := ⟨h.map_mul⟩
/-- Makes a multiplicative isomorphism from a bijection which preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive]
def mk' (f : M ≃ N) (h : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : M ≃* N :=
⟨f.1, f.2, f.3, f.4, h⟩
/-- The identity map is a multiplicative isomorphism. -/
@[refl, to_additive]
def refl (M : Type*) [has_mul M] : M ≃* M :=
{ map_mul' := λ _ _, rfl,
..equiv.refl _}
/-- The inverse of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[symm, to_additive]
def symm (h : M ≃* N) : N ≃* M :=
{ map_mul' := λ n₁ n₂, h.left_inv.injective begin
show h.to_equiv (h.to_equiv.symm (n₁ * n₂)) =
h ((h.to_equiv.symm n₁) * (h.to_equiv.symm n₂)),
rw h.map_mul,
show _ = h.to_equiv (_) * h.to_equiv (_),
rw [h.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply, h.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply, h.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply], end,
..h.to_equiv.symm}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem to_equiv_symm (f : M ≃* N) : f.symm.to_equiv = f.to_equiv.symm := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem coe_mk (f : M → N) (g h₁ h₂ h₃) : ⇑(mul_equiv.mk f g h₁ h₂ h₃) = f := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem coe_symm_mk (f : M → N) (g h₁ h₂ h₃) : ⇑(mul_equiv.mk f g h₁ h₂ h₃).symm = g := rfl
/-- Transitivity of multiplication-preserving isomorphisms -/
@[trans, to_additive]
def trans (h1 : M ≃* N) (h2 : N ≃* P) : (M ≃* P) :=
{ map_mul' := λ x y, show h2 (h1 (x * y)) = h2 (h1 x) * h2 (h1 y),
by rw [h1.map_mul, h2.map_mul],
..h1.to_equiv.trans h2.to_equiv }
/-- e.right_inv in canonical form -/
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma apply_symm_apply (e : M ≃* N) : ∀ y, e (e.symm y) = y :=
e.to_equiv.apply_symm_apply
/-- e.left_inv in canonical form -/
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma symm_apply_apply (e : M ≃* N) : ∀ x, e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.to_equiv.symm_apply_apply
/-- a multiplicative equiv of monoids sends 1 to 1 (and is hence a monoid isomorphism) -/
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_one {M N} [monoid M] [monoid N] (h : M ≃* N) : h 1 = 1 :=
by rw [←mul_one (h 1), ←h.apply_symm_apply 1, ←h.map_mul, one_mul]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma map_eq_one_iff {M N} [monoid M] [monoid N] (h : M ≃* N) {x : M} :
h x = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
h.map_one ▸ h.to_equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq x 1
@[to_additive]
lemma map_ne_one_iff {M N} [monoid M] [monoid N] (h : M ≃* N) {x : M} :
h x ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
⟨mt h.map_eq_one_iff.2, mt h.map_eq_one_iff.1⟩
/--
Extract the forward direction of a multiplicative equivalence
as a multiplication preserving function.
-/
@[to_additive to_add_monoid_hom]
def to_monoid_hom {M N} [monoid M] [monoid N] (h : M ≃* N) : (M →* N) :=
{ map_one' := h.map_one, .. h }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma to_monoid_hom_apply {M N} [monoid M] [monoid N] (e : M ≃* N) (x : M) :
e.to_monoid_hom x = e x :=
rfl
/-- A multiplicative equivalence of groups preserves inversion. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma map_inv [group G] [group H] (h : G ≃* H) (x : G) : h x⁻¹ = (h x)⁻¹ :=
h.to_monoid_hom.map_inv x
/-- A multiplicative bijection between two monoids is a monoid hom
(deprecated -- use to_monoid_hom). -/
@[to_additive is_add_monoid_hom]
instance is_monoid_hom {M N} [monoid M] [monoid N] (h : M ≃* N) : is_monoid_hom h :=
⟨h.map_one⟩
/-- A multiplicative bijection between two groups is a group hom
(deprecated -- use to_monoid_hom). -/
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom]
instance is_group_hom {G H} [group G] [group H] (h : G ≃* H) :
is_group_hom h := { map_mul := h.map_mul }
/-- Two multiplicative isomorphisms agree if they are defined by the
same underlying function. -/
@[ext, to_additive
"Two additive isomorphisms agree if they are defined by the same underlying function."]
lemma ext {f g : mul_equiv M N} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
begin
have h₁ : f.to_equiv = g.to_equiv := equiv.ext h,
cases f, cases g, congr,
{ exact (funext h) },
{ exact congr_arg equiv.inv_fun h₁ }
end
attribute [ext] add_equiv.ext
end mul_equiv
/-- An additive equivalence of additive groups preserves subtraction. -/
lemma add_equiv.map_sub [add_group A] [add_group B] (h : A ≃+ B) (x y : A) :
h (x - y) = h x - h y :=
h.to_add_monoid_hom.map_sub x y
/-- The group of multiplicative automorphisms. -/
@[to_additive "The group of additive automorphisms."]
def mul_aut (M : Type*) [has_mul M] := M ≃* M
attribute [reducible] mul_aut add_aut
namespace mul_aut
variables (M) [has_mul M]
/--
The group operation on multiplicative automorphisms is defined by
`λ g h, mul_equiv.trans h g`.
This means that multiplication agrees with composition, `(g*h)(x) = g (h x)`.
-/
instance : group (mul_aut M) :=
by refine_struct
{ mul := λ g h, mul_equiv.trans h g,
one := mul_equiv.refl M,
inv := mul_equiv.symm };
intros; ext; try { refl }; apply equiv.left_inv
instance : inhabited (mul_aut M) := ⟨1⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (e₁ e₂ : mul_aut M) : ⇑(e₁ * e₂) = e₁ ∘ e₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ⇑(1 : mul_aut M) = id := rfl
/-- Monoid hom from the group of multiplicative automorphisms to the group of permutations. -/
def to_perm : mul_aut M →* equiv.perm M :=
by refine_struct { to_fun := mul_equiv.to_equiv }; intros; refl
end mul_aut
namespace add_aut
variables (A) [has_add A]
/--
The group operation on additive automorphisms is defined by
`λ g h, mul_equiv.trans h g`.
This means that multiplication agrees with composition, `(g*h)(x) = g (h x)`.
-/
instance group : group (add_aut A) :=
by refine_struct
{ mul := λ g h, add_equiv.trans h g,
one := add_equiv.refl A,
inv := add_equiv.symm };
intros; ext; try { refl }; apply equiv.left_inv
instance : inhabited (add_aut A) := ⟨1⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (e₁ e₂ : add_aut A) : ⇑(e₁ * e₂) = e₁ ∘ e₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ⇑(1 : add_aut A) = id := rfl
/-- Monoid hom from the group of multiplicative automorphisms to the group of permutations. -/
def to_perm : add_aut A →* equiv.perm A :=
by refine_struct { to_fun := add_equiv.to_equiv }; intros; refl
end add_aut
/-- A group is isomorphic to its group of units. -/
def to_units (G) [group G] : G ≃* units G :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨x, x⁻¹, mul_inv_self _, inv_mul_self _⟩,
inv_fun := coe,
left_inv := λ x, rfl,
right_inv := λ u, units.ext rfl,
map_mul' := λ x y, units.ext rfl }
namespace units
variables [monoid M] [monoid N] [monoid P]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence of monoids defines a multiplicative equivalence
of their groups of units. -/
def map_equiv (h : M ≃* N) : units M ≃* units N :=
{ inv_fun := map h.symm.to_monoid_hom,
left_inv := λ u, ext $ h.left_inv u,
right_inv := λ u, ext $ h.right_inv u,
.. map h.to_monoid_hom }
end units
namespace equiv
section group
variables [group G]
@[to_additive]
protected def mul_left (a : G) : perm G :=
{ to_fun := λx, a * x,
inv_fun := λx, a⁻¹ * x,
left_inv := assume x, show a⁻¹ * (a * x) = x, from inv_mul_cancel_left a x,
right_inv := assume x, show a * (a⁻¹ * x) = x, from mul_inv_cancel_left a x }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_mul_left (a : G) : ⇑(equiv.mul_left a) = (*) a := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_left_symm (a : G) : (equiv.mul_left a).symm = equiv.mul_left a⁻¹ :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[to_additive]
protected def mul_right (a : G) : perm G :=
{ to_fun := λx, x * a,
inv_fun := λx, x * a⁻¹,
left_inv := assume x, show (x * a) * a⁻¹ = x, from mul_inv_cancel_right x a,
right_inv := assume x, show (x * a⁻¹) * a = x, from inv_mul_cancel_right x a }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_mul_right (a : G) : ⇑(equiv.mul_right a) = λ x, x * a := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_right_symm (a : G) : (equiv.mul_right a).symm = equiv.mul_right a⁻¹ :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
protected def inv : perm G :=
{ to_fun := λa, a⁻¹,
inv_fun := λa, a⁻¹,
left_inv := assume a, inv_inv a,
right_inv := assume a, inv_inv a }
variable {G}
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_inv : ⇑(equiv.inv G) = has_inv.inv := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma inv_symm : (equiv.inv G).symm = equiv.inv G := rfl
end group
section point_reflection
variables [add_comm_group A] (x y : A)
/-- Point reflection in `x` as a permutation. -/
def point_reflection (x : A) : perm A :=
(equiv.neg A).trans (equiv.add_left (x + x))
lemma point_reflection_apply : point_reflection x y = x + x - y := rfl
@[simp] lemma point_reflection_self : point_reflection x x = x := add_sub_cancel _ _
lemma point_reflection_involutive : function.involutive (point_reflection x : A → A) :=
λ y, by simp only [point_reflection_apply, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma point_reflection_symm : (point_reflection x).symm = point_reflection x :=
by { ext y, rw [symm_apply_eq, point_reflection_involutive x y] }
/-- `x` is the only fixed point of `point_reflection x`. This lemma requires
`x + x = y + y ↔ x = y`. There is no typeclass to use here, so we add it as an explicit argument. -/
lemma point_reflection_fixed_iff_of_bit0_inj {x y : A} (h : function.injective (bit0 : A → A)) :
point_reflection x y = y ↔ y = x :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.trans $ h.eq_iff.trans eq_comm
end point_reflection
end equiv
section type_tags
/-- Reinterpret `f : G ≃+ H` as `multiplicative G ≃* multiplicative H`. -/
def add_equiv.to_multiplicative [add_monoid G] [add_monoid H] (f : G ≃+ H) :
multiplicative G ≃* multiplicative H :=
⟨f.to_add_monoid_hom.to_multiplicative, f.symm.to_add_monoid_hom.to_multiplicative, f.3, f.4, f.5⟩
/-- Reinterpret `f : G ≃* H` as `additive G ≃+ additive H`. -/
def mul_equiv.to_additive [monoid G] [monoid H] (f : G ≃* H) : additive G ≃+ additive H :=
⟨f.to_monoid_hom.to_additive, f.symm.to_monoid_hom.to_additive, f.3, f.4, f.5⟩
end type_tags
|
4c062f6b35fe1b1911cb4ca0b197fa9423e94e76 | 64874bd1010548c7f5a6e3e8902efa63baaff785 | /tests/lean/run/elim2.lean | 8c1c738f5f8aca03032df71151999cf248d4e521 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tjiaqi/lean | 4634d729795c164664d10d093f3545287c76628f | d0ce4cf62f4246b0600c07e074d86e51f2195e30 | refs/heads/master | 1,622,323,796,480 | 1,422,643,069,000 | 1,422,643,069,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 266 | lean | import logic
open tactic
constant p : num → num → num → Prop
axiom H1 : ∃ x y z, p x y z
axiom H2 : ∀ {x y z : num}, p x y z → p x x x
theorem tst : ∃ x, p x x x
:= obtain a b c H [visible], from H1,
by (apply exists.intro; apply H2; eassumption)
|
64d9e4cd520172853e41e3ea29160c67db2a12c4 | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/set_theory/zfc.lean | 5a49caba4e135f2a6535582d801371f8fa9ebd77 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 34,161 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.set.basic
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ Choice) using Lean's underlying type theory.
We do this in four main steps:
* Define pre-sets inductively.
* Define extensional equivalence on pre-sets and give it a `setoid` instance.
* Define ZFC sets by quotienting pre-sets by extensional equivalence.
* Define classes as sets of ZFC sets.
Then the rest is usual set theory.
## The model
* `pSet`: Pre-set. A pre-set is inductively defined by its indexing type and its members, which are
themselves pre-sets.
* `Set`: ZFC set. Defined as `pSet` quotiented by `pSet.equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `Class`: Class. Defined as `set Set`.
* `Set.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
## Other definitions
* `arity α n`: `n`-ary function `α → α → ... → α`. Defined inductively.
* `arity.const a n`: `n`-ary constant function equal to `a`.
* `pSet.type`: Underlying type of a pre-set.
* `pSet.func`: Underlying family of pre-sets of a pre-set.
* `pSet.equiv`: Extensional equivalence of pre-sets. Defined inductively.
* `pSet.omega`, `Set.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `pSet`, as a `Set`.
* `pSet.arity.equiv`: Extensional equivalence of `n`-ary `pSet`-valued functions. Extension of
`pSet.equiv`.
* `pSet.resp`: Collection of `n`-ary `pSet`-valued functions that respect extensional equivalence.
* `pSet.eval`: Turns a `pSet`-valued function that respect extensional equivalence into a
`Set`-valued function.
* `classical.all_definable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `Set.is_func` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `Set.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `Class.iota`: Definite description operator.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`set`" and "ZFC set".
## TODO
Prove `Set.map_definable_aux` computably.
-/
universes u v
/-- The type of `n`-ary functions `α → α → ... → α`. -/
def arity (α : Type u) : ℕ → Type u
| 0 := α
| (n+1) := α → arity n
namespace arity
/-- Constant `n`-ary function with value `a`. -/
def const {α : Type u} (a : α) : ∀ n, arity α n
| 0 := a
| (n+1) := λ _, const n
instance arity.inhabited {α n} [inhabited α] : inhabited (arity α n) :=
⟨const (default _) _⟩
end arity
/-- The type of pre-sets in universe `u`. A pre-set
is a family of pre-sets indexed by a type in `Type u`.
The ZFC universe is defined as a quotient of this
to ensure extensionality. -/
inductive pSet : Type (u+1)
| mk (α : Type u) (A : α → pSet) : pSet
namespace pSet
/-- The underlying type of a pre-set -/
def type : pSet → Type u
| ⟨α, A⟩ := α
/-- The underlying pre-set family of a pre-set -/
def func : Π (x : pSet), x.type → pSet
| ⟨α, A⟩ := A
theorem mk_type_func : Π (x : pSet), mk x.type x.func = x
| ⟨α, A⟩ := rfl
/-- Two pre-sets are extensionally equivalent if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family and vice-versa. -/
def equiv (x y : pSet) : Prop :=
pSet.rec (λ α z m ⟨β, B⟩, (∀ a, ∃ b, m a (B b)) ∧ (∀ b, ∃ a, m a (B b))) x y
theorem equiv.refl (x) : equiv x x :=
pSet.rec_on x $ λ α A IH, ⟨λ a, ⟨a, IH a⟩, λ a, ⟨a, IH a⟩⟩
theorem equiv.rfl : ∀ {x}, equiv x x := equiv.refl
theorem equiv.euc {x} : Π {y z}, equiv x y → equiv z y → equiv x z :=
pSet.rec_on x $ λ α A IH y, pSet.cases_on y $ λ β B ⟨γ, Γ⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ ⟨γβ, βγ⟩,
⟨λ a, let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a, ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b in ⟨c, IH a ab bc⟩,
λ c, let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c, ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b in ⟨a, IH a ba cb⟩⟩
theorem equiv.symm {x y} : equiv x y → equiv y x :=
(equiv.refl y).euc
theorem equiv.trans {x y z} (h1 : equiv x y) (h2 : equiv y z) : equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
instance setoid : setoid pSet :=
⟨pSet.equiv, equiv.refl, λ x y, equiv.symm, λ x y z, equiv.trans⟩
/-- A pre-set is a subset of another pre-set if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family.-/
protected def subset : pSet → pSet → Prop
| ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ := ∀ a, ∃ b, equiv (A a) (B b)
instance : has_subset pSet := ⟨pSet.subset⟩
theorem equiv.ext : Π (x y : pSet), equiv x y ↔ (x ⊆ y ∧ y ⊆ x)
| ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨αβ, βα⟩, ⟨αβ, λ b, let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b in ⟨a, equiv.symm h⟩⟩,
λ ⟨αβ, βα⟩, ⟨αβ, λ b, let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b in ⟨a, equiv.symm h⟩⟩⟩
theorem subset.congr_left : Π {x y z : pSet}, equiv x y → (x ⊆ z ↔ y ⊆ z)
| ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨γ, Γ⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ :=
⟨λ αγ b, let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b, ⟨c, ac⟩ := αγ a in ⟨c, (equiv.symm ba).trans ac⟩,
λ βγ a, let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a, ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b in ⟨c, equiv.trans ab bc⟩⟩
theorem subset.congr_right : Π {x y z : pSet}, equiv x y → (z ⊆ x ↔ z ⊆ y)
| ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨γ, Γ⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ :=
⟨λ γα c, let ⟨a, ca⟩ := γα c, ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a in ⟨b, ca.trans ab⟩,
λ γβ c, let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c, ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b in ⟨a, cb.trans (equiv.symm ab)⟩⟩
/-- `x ∈ y` as pre-sets if `x` is extensionally equivalent to a member of the family `y`. -/
def mem : pSet → pSet → Prop
| x ⟨β, B⟩ := ∃ b, equiv x (B b)
instance : has_mem pSet.{u} pSet.{u} := ⟨mem⟩
theorem mem.mk {α: Type u} (A : α → pSet) (a : α) : A a ∈ mk α A :=
⟨a, equiv.refl (A a)⟩
theorem mem.ext : Π {x y : pSet.{u}}, (∀ w : pSet.{u}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y) → equiv x y
| ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ h := ⟨λ a, (h (A a)).1 (mem.mk A a),
λ b, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (h (B b)).2 (mem.mk B b) in ⟨a, ha.symm⟩⟩
theorem mem.congr_right : Π {x y : pSet.{u}}, equiv x y → (∀ {w : pSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y)
| ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ w :=
⟨λ ⟨a, ha⟩, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a in ⟨b, ha.trans hb⟩,
λ ⟨b, hb⟩, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b in ⟨a, hb.euc ha⟩⟩
theorem equiv_iff_mem {x y : pSet.{u}} : equiv x y ↔ (∀ {w : pSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y) :=
⟨mem.congr_right, match x, y with
| ⟨α, A⟩, ⟨β, B⟩, h := ⟨λ a, h.1 (mem.mk A a), λ b,
let ⟨a, h⟩ := h.2 (mem.mk B b) in ⟨a, h.symm⟩⟩
end⟩
theorem mem.congr_left : Π {x y : pSet.{u}}, equiv x y → (∀ {w : pSet.{u}}, x ∈ w ↔ y ∈ w)
| x y h ⟨α, A⟩ := ⟨λ ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨a, h.symm.trans ha⟩, λ ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨a, h.trans ha⟩⟩
/-- Convert a pre-set to a `set` of pre-sets. -/
def to_set (u : pSet.{u}) : set pSet.{u} := {x | x ∈ u}
/-- Two pre-sets are equivalent iff they have the same members. -/
theorem equiv.eq {x y : pSet} : equiv x y ↔ to_set x = to_set y :=
equiv_iff_mem.trans set.ext_iff.symm
instance : has_coe pSet (set pSet) := ⟨to_set⟩
/-- The empty pre-set -/
protected def empty : pSet := ⟨ulift empty, λ e, match e with end⟩
instance : has_emptyc pSet := ⟨pSet.empty⟩
instance : inhabited pSet := ⟨∅⟩
theorem mem_empty (x : pSet.{u}) : x ∉ (∅ : pSet.{u}) := λ e, match e with end
/-- Insert an element into a pre-set -/
protected def insert : pSet → pSet → pSet
| u ⟨α, A⟩ := ⟨option α, λ o, option.rec u A o⟩
instance : has_insert pSet pSet := ⟨pSet.insert⟩
instance : has_singleton pSet pSet := ⟨λ s, insert s ∅⟩
instance : is_lawful_singleton pSet pSet := ⟨λ _, rfl⟩
/-- The n-th von Neumann ordinal -/
def of_nat : ℕ → pSet
| 0 := ∅
| (n+1) := pSet.insert (of_nat n) (of_nat n)
/-- The von Neumann ordinal ω -/
def omega : pSet := ⟨ulift ℕ, λ n, of_nat n.down⟩
/-- The pre-set separation operation `{x ∈ a | p x}` -/
protected def sep (p : set pSet) : pSet → pSet
| ⟨α, A⟩ := ⟨{a // p (A a)}, λ x, A x.1⟩
instance : has_sep pSet pSet := ⟨pSet.sep⟩
/-- The pre-set powerset operator -/
def powerset : pSet → pSet
| ⟨α, A⟩ := ⟨set α, λ p, ⟨{a // p a}, λ x, A x.1⟩⟩
theorem mem_powerset : Π {x y : pSet}, y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x
| ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ := ⟨λ ⟨p, e⟩, (subset.congr_left e).2 $ λ ⟨a, pa⟩, ⟨a, equiv.refl (A a)⟩,
λ βα, ⟨{a | ∃ b, equiv (B b) (A a)}, λ b, let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b in ⟨⟨a, b, ba⟩, ba⟩,
λ ⟨a, b, ba⟩, ⟨b, ba⟩⟩⟩
/-- The pre-set union operator -/
def Union : pSet → pSet
| ⟨α, A⟩ := ⟨Σx, (A x).type, λ ⟨x, y⟩, (A x).func y⟩
theorem mem_Union : Π {x y : pSet.{u}}, y ∈ Union x ↔ ∃ z : pSet.{u}, ∃ _ : z ∈ x, y ∈ z
| ⟨α, A⟩ y :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, c⟩, (e : equiv y ((A a).func c))⟩,
have func (A a) c ∈ mk (A a).type (A a).func, from mem.mk (A a).func c,
⟨_, mem.mk _ _, (mem.congr_left e).2 (by rwa mk_type_func at this)⟩,
λ ⟨⟨β, B⟩, ⟨a, (e : equiv (mk β B) (A a))⟩, ⟨b, yb⟩⟩,
by { rw ←(mk_type_func (A a)) at e, exact
let ⟨βt, tβ⟩ := e, ⟨c, bc⟩ := βt b in ⟨⟨a, c⟩, yb.trans bc⟩ }⟩
/-- The image of a function from pre-sets to pre-sets. -/
def image (f : pSet.{u} → pSet.{u}) : pSet.{u} → pSet
| ⟨α, A⟩ := ⟨α, λ a, f (A a)⟩
theorem mem_image {f : pSet.{u} → pSet.{u}} (H : ∀ {x y}, equiv x y → equiv (f x) (f y)) :
Π {x y : pSet.{u}}, y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, equiv y (f z)
| ⟨α, A⟩ y := ⟨λ ⟨a, ya⟩, ⟨A a, mem.mk A a, ya⟩, λ ⟨z, ⟨a, za⟩, yz⟩, ⟨a, yz.trans (H za)⟩⟩
/-- Universe lift operation -/
protected def lift : pSet.{u} → pSet.{max u v}
| ⟨α, A⟩ := ⟨ulift α, λ ⟨x⟩, lift (A x)⟩
/-- Embedding of one universe in another -/
def embed : pSet.{max (u+1) v} := ⟨ulift.{v u+1} pSet, λ ⟨x⟩, pSet.lift.{u (max (u+1) v)} x⟩
theorem lift_mem_embed : Π (x : pSet.{u}), pSet.lift.{u (max (u+1) v)} x ∈ embed.{u v} :=
λ x, ⟨⟨x⟩, equiv.rfl⟩
/-- Function equivalence is defined so that `f ~ g` iff `∀ x y, x ~ y → f x ~ g y`. This extends to
equivalence of `n`-ary functions. -/
def arity.equiv : Π {n}, arity pSet.{u} n → arity pSet.{u} n → Prop
| 0 a b := equiv a b
| (n+1) a b := ∀ x y, equiv x y → arity.equiv (a x) (b y)
lemma arity.equiv_const {a : pSet.{u}} : ∀ n, arity.equiv (arity.const a n) (arity.const a n)
| 0 := equiv.rfl
| (n+1) := λ x y h, arity.equiv_const _
/-- `resp n` is the collection of n-ary functions on `pSet` that respect
equivalence, i.e. when the inputs are equivalent the output is as well. -/
def resp (n) := {x : arity pSet.{u} n // arity.equiv x x}
instance resp.inhabited {n} : inhabited (resp n) :=
⟨⟨arity.const (default _) _, arity.equiv_const _⟩⟩
/-- The `n`-ary image of a `(n + 1)`-ary function respecting equivalence as a function respecting
equivalence. -/
def resp.f {n} (f : resp (n+1)) (x : pSet) : resp n :=
⟨f.1 x, f.2 _ _ $ equiv.refl x⟩
/-- Function equivalence for functions respecting equivalence. See `pSet.arity.equiv`. -/
def resp.equiv {n} (a b : resp n) : Prop := arity.equiv a.1 b.1
theorem resp.refl {n} (a : resp n) : resp.equiv a a := a.2
theorem resp.euc : Π {n} {a b c : resp n}, resp.equiv a b → resp.equiv c b → resp.equiv a c
| 0 a b c hab hcb := hab.euc hcb
| (n+1) a b c hab hcb := λ x y h,
@resp.euc n (a.f x) (b.f y) (c.f y) (hab _ _ h) (hcb _ _ $ equiv.refl y)
instance resp.setoid {n} : setoid (resp n) :=
⟨resp.equiv, resp.refl, λ x y h, resp.euc (resp.refl y) h,
λ x y z h1 h2, resp.euc h1 $ resp.euc (resp.refl z) h2⟩
end pSet
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
def Set : Type (u+1) := quotient pSet.setoid.{u}
namespace pSet
namespace resp
/-- Helper function for `pSet.eval`. -/
def eval_aux : Π {n}, {f : resp n → arity Set.{u} n // ∀ (a b : resp n), resp.equiv a b → f a = f b}
| 0 := ⟨λ a, ⟦a.1⟧, λ a b h, quotient.sound h⟩
| (n+1) := let F : resp (n + 1) → arity Set (n + 1) := λ a, @quotient.lift _ _ pSet.setoid
(λ x, eval_aux.1 (a.f x)) (λ b c h, eval_aux.2 _ _ (a.2 _ _ h)) in
⟨F, λ b c h, funext $ @quotient.ind _ _ (λ q, F b q = F c q) $ λ z,
eval_aux.2 (resp.f b z) (resp.f c z) (h _ _ (equiv.refl z))⟩
/-- An equivalence-respecting function yields an n-ary ZFC set function. -/
def eval (n) : resp n → arity Set.{u} n := eval_aux.1
theorem eval_val {n f x} : (@eval (n+1) f : Set → arity Set n) ⟦x⟧ = eval n (resp.f f x) := rfl
end resp
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary pre-set
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class inductive definable (n) : arity Set.{u} n → Type (u+1)
| mk (f) : definable (resp.eval _ f)
attribute [instance] definable.mk
/-- The evaluation of a function respecting equivalence is definable, by that same function. -/
def definable.eq_mk {n} (f) : Π {s : arity Set.{u} n} (H : resp.eval _ f = s), definable n s
| ._ rfl := ⟨f⟩
/-- Turns a definable function into a function that respects equivalence. -/
def definable.resp {n} : Π (s : arity Set.{u} n) [definable n s], resp n
| ._ ⟨f⟩ := f
theorem definable.eq {n} :
Π (s : arity Set.{u} n) [H : definable n s], (@definable.resp n s H).eval _ = s
| ._ ⟨f⟩ := rfl
end pSet
namespace classical
open pSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def all_definable : Π {n} (F : arity Set.{u} n), definable n F
| 0 F := let p := @quotient.exists_rep pSet _ F in
definable.eq_mk ⟨some p, equiv.rfl⟩ (some_spec p)
| (n+1) (F : arity Set.{u} (n + 1)) := begin
have I := λ x, (all_definable (F x)),
refine definable.eq_mk ⟨λ x : pSet, (@definable.resp _ _ (I ⟦x⟧)).1, _⟩ _,
{ dsimp [arity.equiv],
introsI x y h,
rw @quotient.sound pSet _ _ _ h,
exact (definable.resp (F ⟦y⟧)).2 },
refine funext (λ q, quotient.induction_on q $ λ x, _),
simp_rw [resp.eval_val, resp.f, subtype.val_eq_coe, subtype.coe_eta],
exact @definable.eq _ (F ⟦x⟧) (I ⟦x⟧),
end
end classical
namespace Set
open pSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : pSet → Set := quotient.mk
@[simp] theorem mk_eq (x : pSet) : @eq Set ⟦x⟧ (mk x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma eval_mk {n f x} :
(@resp.eval (n+1) f : Set → arity Set n) (mk x) = resp.eval n (resp.f f x) :=
rfl
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
def mem : Set → Set → Prop :=
quotient.lift₂ pSet.mem
(λ x y x' y' hx hy, propext ((mem.congr_left hx).trans (mem.congr_right hy)))
instance : has_mem Set Set := ⟨mem⟩
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `set` of ZFC sets -/
def to_set (u : Set.{u}) : set Set.{u} := {x | x ∈ u}
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def subset (x y : Set.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
instance has_subset : has_subset Set :=
⟨Set.subset⟩
lemma subset_def {x y : Set.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y := iff.rfl
theorem subset_iff : Π (x y : pSet), mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ := ⟨λ h a, @h ⟦A a⟧ (mem.mk A a),
λ h z, quotient.induction_on z (λ z ⟨a, za⟩, let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a in ⟨b, za.trans ab⟩)⟩
theorem ext {x y : Set.{u}} : (∀ z : Set.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
quotient.induction_on₂ x y (λ u v h, quotient.sound (mem.ext (λ w, h ⟦w⟧)))
theorem ext_iff {x y : Set.{u}} : (∀ z : Set.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) ↔ x = y :=
⟨ext, λ h, by simp [h]⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
def empty : Set := mk ∅
instance : has_emptyc Set := ⟨empty⟩
instance : inhabited Set := ⟨∅⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : Set.{u}) :=
quotient.induction_on x pSet.mem_empty
theorem eq_empty (x : Set.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : Set.{u}, y ∉ x :=
⟨λ h y, (h.symm ▸ mem_empty y),
λ h, ext (λ y, ⟨λ yx, absurd yx (h y), λ y0, absurd y0 (mem_empty _)⟩)⟩
/-- `insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def insert : Set → Set → Set :=
resp.eval 2 ⟨pSet.insert, λ u v uv ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩,
⟨λ o, match o with
| some a := let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a in ⟨some b, hb⟩
| none := ⟨none, uv⟩
end, λ o, match o with
| some b := let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b in ⟨some a, ha⟩
| none := ⟨none, uv⟩
end⟩⟩
instance : has_insert Set Set := ⟨Set.insert⟩
instance : has_singleton Set Set := ⟨λ x, insert x ∅⟩
instance : is_lawful_singleton Set Set := ⟨λ x, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_insert {x y z : Set.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
quotient.induction_on₃ x y z
(λ x y ⟨α, A⟩, show x ∈ pSet.mk (option α) (λ o, option.rec y A o) ↔
mk x = mk y ∨ x ∈ pSet.mk α A, from
⟨λ m, match m with
| ⟨some a, ha⟩ := or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩
| ⟨none, h⟩ := or.inl (quotient.sound h)
end, λ m, match m with
| or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩ := ⟨some a, ha⟩
| or.inl h := ⟨none, quotient.exact h⟩
end⟩)
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {x y : Set.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton Set.{u} Set.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
iff.trans mem_insert ⟨λ o, or.rec (λ h, h) (λ n, absurd n (mem_empty _)) o, or.inl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_pair {x y z : Set.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : Set) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z :=
iff.trans mem_insert $ or_congr iff.rfl mem_singleton
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : Set := mk omega
@[simp] theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, equiv.rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
quotient.induction_on n (λ x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩, ⟨⟨n+1⟩,
have Set.insert ⟦x⟧ ⟦x⟧ = Set.insert ⟦of_nat n⟧ ⟦of_nat n⟧, by rw (@quotient.sound pSet _ _ _ h),
quotient.exact this⟩)
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : Set → Prop) : Set → Set :=
resp.eval 1 ⟨pSet.sep (λ y, p ⟦y⟧), λ ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩,
⟨λ ⟨a, pa⟩, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a in ⟨⟨b, by rwa ←(@quotient.sound pSet _ _ _ hb)⟩, hb⟩,
λ ⟨b, pb⟩, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b in ⟨⟨a, by rwa (@quotient.sound pSet _ _ _ ha)⟩, ha⟩⟩⟩
instance : has_sep Set Set := ⟨Set.sep⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sep {p : Set.{u} → Prop} {x y : Set.{u}} : y ∈ {y ∈ x | p y} ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
quotient.induction_on₂ x y (λ ⟨α, A⟩ y,
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, h⟩, ⟨⟨a, h⟩, by { rw (@quotient.sound pSet _ _ _ h), exact pa }⟩,
λ ⟨⟨a, h⟩, pa⟩, ⟨⟨a, by { rw ←(@quotient.sound pSet _ _ _ h), exact pa }⟩, h⟩⟩)
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : Set → Set :=
resp.eval 1 ⟨powerset, λ ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩,
⟨λ p, ⟨{b | ∃ a, p a ∧ equiv (A a) (B b)},
λ ⟨a, pa⟩, let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a in ⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
λ ⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
λ q, ⟨{a | ∃ b, q b ∧ equiv (A a) (B b)},
λ ⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩,
λ ⟨b, qb⟩, let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b in ⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset {x y : Set} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
quotient.induction_on₂ x y (λ ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩,
show (⟨β, B⟩ : pSet) ∈ (pSet.powerset ⟨α, A⟩) ↔ _,
by simp [mem_powerset, subset_iff])
theorem Union_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → pSet) (B : β → pSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, (equiv ((Union ⟨α, A⟩).func a) ((Union ⟨β, B⟩).func b))
| ⟨a, c⟩ := let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a in
begin
induction ea : A a with γ Γ,
induction eb : B b with δ Δ,
rw [ea, eb] at hb,
cases hb with γδ δγ,
exact
let c : type (A a) := c, ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa ea at c) in
have equiv ((A a).func c) ((B b).func (eq.rec d (eq.symm eb))), from
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with ._, ._, rfl, rfl, x, y, hd := hd end,
⟨⟨b, eq.rec d (eq.symm eb)⟩, this⟩
end
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def Union : Set → Set :=
resp.eval 1 ⟨pSet.Union, λ ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩,
⟨Union_lem A B αβ, λ a, exists.elim (Union_lem B A (λ b,
exists.elim (βα b) (λ c hc, ⟨c, equiv.symm hc⟩)) a) (λ b hb, ⟨b, equiv.symm hb⟩)⟩⟩
notation `⋃` := Union
@[simp] theorem mem_Union {x y : Set.{u}} : y ∈ Union x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
quotient.induction_on₂ x y (λ x y, iff.trans mem_Union
⟨λ ⟨z, h⟩, ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, λ ⟨z, h⟩, quotient.induction_on z (λ z h, ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩)
@[simp] theorem Union_singleton {x : Set.{u}} : Union {x} = x :=
ext $ λ y, by simp_rw [mem_Union, exists_prop, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : Set.{u}} (H : ({x} : Set) = {y}) : x = y :=
let this := congr_arg Union H in by rwa [Union_singleton, Union_singleton] at this
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : Set.{u}) : Set.{u} := ⋃ {x, y}
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : Set.{u}) : Set.{u} := {z ∈ x | z ∈ y}
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : Set.{u}) : Set.{u} := {z ∈ x | z ∉ y}
instance : has_union Set := ⟨Set.union⟩
instance : has_inter Set := ⟨Set.inter⟩
instance : has_sdiff Set := ⟨Set.diff⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_union {x y z : Set.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y :=
iff.trans mem_Union
⟨λ ⟨w, wxy, zw⟩, match mem_pair.1 wxy with
| or.inl wx := or.inl (by rwa ←wx)
| or.inr wy := or.inr (by rwa ←wy)
end, λ zxy, match zxy with
| or.inl zx := ⟨x, mem_pair.2 (or.inl rfl), zx⟩
| or.inr zy := ⟨y, mem_pair.2 (or.inr rfl), zy⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {x y z : Set.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@@mem_sep (λ z : Set.{u}, z ∈ y)
@[simp] theorem mem_diff {x y z : Set.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@@mem_sep (λ z : Set.{u}, z ∉ y)
theorem induction_on {p : Set → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
quotient.induction_on x $ λ u, pSet.rec_on u $ λ α A IH, h _ $ λ y,
show @has_mem.mem _ _ Set.has_mem y ⟦⟨α, A⟩⟧ → p y, from
quotient.induction_on y (λ v ⟨a, ha⟩, by { rw (@quotient.sound pSet _ _ _ ha), exact IH a })
theorem regularity (x : Set.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
classical.by_contradiction $ λ ne, h $ (eq_empty x).2 $ λ y,
induction_on y $ λ z (IH : ∀ w : Set.{u}, w ∈ z → w ∉ x), show z ∉ x, from λ zx,
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 (λ w wxz, let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz in IH w wz wx)⟩
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : Set → Set) [H : definable 1 f] : Set → Set :=
let r := @definable.resp 1 f _ in
resp.eval 1 ⟨image r.1, λ x y e, mem.ext $ λ z,
iff.trans (mem_image r.2) $ iff.trans (by exact
⟨λ ⟨w, h1, h2⟩, ⟨w, (mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩,
λ ⟨w, h1, h2⟩, ⟨w, (mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩) $
iff.symm (mem_image r.2)⟩
theorem image.mk :
Π (f : Set.{u} → Set.{u}) [H : definable 1 f] (x) {y} (h : y ∈ x), f y ∈ @image f H x
| ._ ⟨F⟩ x y := quotient.induction_on₂ x y $ λ ⟨α, A⟩ y ⟨a, ya⟩, ⟨a, F.2 _ _ ya⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_image : Π {f : Set.{u} → Set.{u}} [H : definable 1 f] {x y : Set.{u}},
y ∈ @image f H x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y
| ._ ⟨F⟩ x y := quotient.induction_on₂ x y $ λ ⟨α, A⟩ y,
⟨λ ⟨a, ya⟩, ⟨⟦A a⟧, mem.mk A a, eq.symm $ quotient.sound ya⟩,
λ ⟨z, hz, e⟩, e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : Set.{u}) : Set.{u} := {{x}, {x, y}}
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pair_sep (p : Set.{u} → Set.{u} → Prop) (x y : Set.{u}) : Set.{u} :=
{z ∈ powerset (powerset (x ∪ y)) | ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b}
@[simp] theorem mem_pair_sep {p} {x y z : Set.{u}} :
z ∈ pair_sep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b :=
begin
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨and.right, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩,
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩,
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair],
rintros u (rfl|rfl) v; simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair],
{ rintro rfl, exact or.inl ax },
{ rintro (rfl|rfl); [left, right]; assumption }
end
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : Set.{u}} (H : pair x y = pair x' y') : x = x' ∧ y = y' := begin
have ae := ext_iff.2 H,
simp [pair] at ae,
have : x = x',
{ cases (ae {x}).1 (by simp) with h h,
{ exact singleton_inj h },
{ have m : x' ∈ ({x} : Set),
{ rw h, simp },
simp at m, simp [*] } },
subst x',
have he : y = x → y = y',
{ intro yx, subst y,
cases (ae {x, y'}).2 (by simp only [eq_self_iff_true, or_true]) with xy'x xy'xx,
{ rw [eq_comm, ←mem_singleton, ←xy'x, mem_pair],
exact or.inr rfl },
{ have yxx := (ext_iff.2 xy'xx y').1 (by simp),
simp at yxx, subst y' } },
have xyxy' := (ae {x, y}).1 (by simp),
cases xyxy' with xyx xyy',
{ have yx := (ext_iff.2 xyx y).1 (by simp),
simp at yx, simp [he yx] },
{ have yxy' := (ext_iff.2 xyy' y).1 (by simp),
simp at yxy',
cases yxy' with yx yy',
{ simp [he yx] },
{ simp [yy'] } }
end
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : Set.{u} → Set.{u} → Set.{u} := pair_sep (λ a b, true)
@[simp] theorem mem_prod {x y z : Set.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b :=
by simp [prod]
@[simp] theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : Set.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', a'x, b', b'y, e⟩ := mem_prod.1 h in
match a', b', pair_inj e, a'x, b'y with ._, ._, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ax, bY := ⟨ax, bY⟩ end,
λ ⟨ax, bY⟩, mem_prod.2 ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl⟩⟩
/-- `is_func x y f` is the assertion that `f` is a subset of `x × y` which relates to each element
of `x` a unique element of `y`, so that we can consider `f`as a ZFC function `x → y`. -/
def is_func (x y f : Set.{u}) : Prop :=
f ⊆ prod x y ∧ ∀ z : Set.{u}, z ∈ x → ∃! w, pair z w ∈ f
/-- `funs x y` is `y ^ x`, the set of all set functions `x → y` -/
def funs (x y : Set.{u}) : Set.{u} :=
{f ∈ powerset (prod x y) | is_func x y f}
@[simp] theorem mem_funs {x y f : Set.{u}} : f ∈ funs x y ↔ is_func x y f :=
by simp [funs, is_func]
-- TODO(Mario): Prove this computably
noncomputable instance map_definable_aux (f : Set → Set) [H : definable 1 f] :
definable 1 (λ y, pair y (f y)) :=
@classical.all_definable 1 _
/-- Graph of a function: `map f x` is the ZFC function which maps `a ∈ x` to `f a` -/
noncomputable def map (f : Set → Set) [H : definable 1 f] : Set → Set :=
image (λ y, pair y (f y))
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : Set → Set} [H : definable 1 f] {x y : Set} :
y ∈ map f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, pair z (f z) = y :=
mem_image
theorem map_unique {f : Set.{u} → Set.{u}} [H : definable 1 f] {x z : Set.{u}} (zx : z ∈ x) :
∃! w, pair z w ∈ map f x :=
⟨f z, image.mk _ _ zx, λ y yx, let ⟨w, wx, we⟩ := mem_image.1 yx, ⟨wz, fy⟩ := pair_inj we in
by rw[←fy, wz]⟩
@[simp] theorem map_is_func {f : Set → Set} [H : definable 1 f] {x y : Set} :
is_func x y (map f x) ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, f z ∈ y :=
⟨λ ⟨ss, h⟩ z zx, let ⟨t, t1, t2⟩ := h z zx in
(t2 (f z) (image.mk _ _ zx)).symm ▸ (pair_mem_prod.1 (ss t1)).right,
λ h, ⟨λ y yx, let ⟨z, zx, ze⟩ := mem_image.1 yx in ze ▸ pair_mem_prod.2 ⟨zx, h z zx⟩,
λ z, map_unique⟩⟩
end Set
/-- The collection of all classes. A class is defined as a `set` of ZFC sets. -/
def Class := set Set
namespace Class
instance : has_subset Class := ⟨set.subset⟩
instance : has_sep Set Class := ⟨set.sep⟩
instance : has_emptyc Class := ⟨λ a, false⟩
instance : inhabited Class := ⟨∅⟩
instance : has_insert Set Class := ⟨set.insert⟩
instance : has_union Class := ⟨set.union⟩
instance : has_inter Class := ⟨set.inter⟩
instance : has_neg Class := ⟨set.compl⟩
instance : has_sdiff Class := ⟨set.diff⟩
/-- Coerce a ZFC set into a class -/
def of_Set (x : Set.{u}) : Class.{u} := {y | y ∈ x}
instance : has_coe Set Class := ⟨of_Set⟩
/-- The universal class -/
def univ : Class := set.univ
/-- Assert that `A` is a ZFC set satisfying `p` -/
def to_Set (p : Set.{u} → Prop) (A : Class.{u}) : Prop := ∃ x, ↑x = A ∧ p x
/-- `A ∈ B` if `A` is a ZFC set which is a member of `B` -/
protected def mem (A B : Class.{u}) : Prop := to_Set.{u} B A
instance : has_mem Class Class := ⟨Class.mem⟩
theorem mem_univ {A : Class.{u}} : A ∈ univ.{u} ↔ ∃ x : Set.{u}, ↑x = A :=
exists_congr $ λ x, and_true _
/-- Convert a conglomerate (a collection of classes) into a class -/
def Cong_to_Class (x : set Class.{u}) : Class.{u} := {y | ↑y ∈ x}
/-- Convert a class into a conglomerate (a collection of classes) -/
def Class_to_Cong (x : Class.{u}) : set Class.{u} := {y | y ∈ x}
/-- The power class of a class is the class of all subclasses that are ZFC sets -/
def powerset (x : Class) : Class := Cong_to_Class (set.powerset x)
/-- The union of a class is the class of all members of ZFC sets in the class -/
def Union (x : Class) : Class := set.sUnion (Class_to_Cong x)
notation `⋃` := Union
theorem of_Set.inj {x y : Set.{u}} (h : (x : Class.{u}) = y) : x = y :=
Set.ext $ λ z, by { change (x : Class.{u}) z ↔ (y : Class.{u}) z, rw h }
@[simp] theorem to_Set_of_Set (p : Set.{u} → Prop) (x : Set.{u}) : to_Set p x ↔ p x :=
⟨λ ⟨y, yx, py⟩, by rwa of_Set.inj yx at py, λ px, ⟨x, rfl, px⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_hom_left (x : Set.{u}) (A : Class.{u}) : (x : Class.{u}) ∈ A ↔ A x :=
to_Set_of_Set _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_hom_right (x y : Set.{u}) : (y : Class.{u}) x ↔ x ∈ y := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem subset_hom (x y : Set.{u}) : (x : Class.{u}) ⊆ y ↔ x ⊆ y := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem sep_hom (p : Set.{u} → Prop) (x : Set.{u}) :
(↑{y ∈ x | p y} : Class.{u}) = {y ∈ x | p y} :=
set.ext $ λ y, Set.mem_sep
@[simp] theorem empty_hom : ↑(∅ : Set.{u}) = (∅ : Class.{u}) :=
set.ext $ λ y, (iff_false _).2 (Set.mem_empty y)
@[simp] theorem insert_hom (x y : Set.{u}) : (@insert Set.{u} Class.{u} _ x y) = ↑(insert x y) :=
set.ext $ λ z, iff.symm Set.mem_insert
@[simp] theorem union_hom (x y : Set.{u}) : (x : Class.{u}) ∪ y = (x ∪ y : Set.{u}) :=
set.ext $ λ z, iff.symm Set.mem_union
@[simp] theorem inter_hom (x y : Set.{u}) : (x : Class.{u}) ∩ y = (x ∩ y : Set.{u}) :=
set.ext $ λ z, iff.symm Set.mem_inter
@[simp] theorem diff_hom (x y : Set.{u}) : (x : Class.{u}) \ y = (x \ y : Set.{u}) :=
set.ext $ λ z, iff.symm Set.mem_diff
@[simp] theorem powerset_hom (x : Set.{u}) : powerset.{u} x = Set.powerset x :=
set.ext $ λ z, iff.symm Set.mem_powerset
@[simp] theorem Union_hom (x : Set.{u}) : Union.{u} x = Set.Union x :=
set.ext $ λ z, by { refine iff.trans _ Set.mem_Union.symm, exact
⟨λ ⟨._, ⟨a, rfl, ax⟩, za⟩, ⟨a, ax, za⟩, λ ⟨a, ax, za⟩, ⟨_, ⟨a, rfl, ax⟩, za⟩⟩ }
/-- The definite description operator, which is `{x}` if `{a | p a} = {x}` and `∅` otherwise. -/
def iota (p : Set → Prop) : Class := Union {x | ∀ y, p y ↔ y = x}
theorem iota_val (p : Set → Prop) (x : Set) (H : ∀ y, p y ↔ y = x) : iota p = ↑x :=
set.ext $ λ y, ⟨λ ⟨._, ⟨x', rfl, h⟩, yx'⟩, by rwa ←((H x').1 $ (h x').2 rfl),
λ yx, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl, H⟩, yx⟩⟩
/-- Unlike the other set constructors, the `iota` definite descriptor
is a set for any set input, but not constructively so, so there is no
associated `(Set → Prop) → Set` function. -/
theorem iota_ex (p) : iota.{u} p ∈ univ.{u} :=
mem_univ.2 $ or.elim (classical.em $ ∃ x, ∀ y, p y ↔ y = x)
(λ ⟨x, h⟩, ⟨x, eq.symm $ iota_val p x h⟩)
(λ hn, ⟨∅, set.ext (λ z, empty_hom.symm ▸ ⟨false.rec _, λ ⟨._, ⟨x, rfl, H⟩, zA⟩, hn ⟨x, H⟩⟩)⟩)
/-- Function value -/
def fval (F A : Class.{u}) : Class.{u} := iota (λ y, to_Set (λ x, F (Set.pair x y)) A)
infixl `′`:100 := fval
theorem fval_ex (F A : Class.{u}) : F ′ A ∈ univ.{u} := iota_ex _
end Class
namespace Set
@[simp] theorem map_fval {f : Set.{u} → Set.{u}} [H : pSet.definable 1 f]
{x y : Set.{u}} (h : y ∈ x) :
(Set.map f x ′ y : Class.{u}) = f y :=
Class.iota_val _ _ (λ z, by { rw [Class.to_Set_of_Set, Class.mem_hom_right, mem_map], exact
⟨λ ⟨w, wz, pr⟩, let ⟨wy, fw⟩ := Set.pair_inj pr in by rw[←fw, wy],
λ e, by { subst e, exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ }⟩ })
variables (x : Set.{u}) (h : ∅ ∉ x)
/-- A choice function on the class of nonempty ZFC sets. -/
noncomputable def choice : Set :=
@map (λ y, classical.epsilon (λ z, z ∈ y)) (classical.all_definable _) x
include h
theorem choice_mem_aux (y : Set.{u}) (yx : y ∈ x) : classical.epsilon (λ z : Set.{u}, z ∈ y) ∈ y :=
@classical.epsilon_spec _ (λ z : Set.{u}, z ∈ y) $ classical.by_contradiction $ λ n, h $
by rwa ←((eq_empty y).2 $ λ z zx, n ⟨z, zx⟩)
theorem choice_is_func : is_func x (Union x) (choice x) :=
(@map_is_func _ (classical.all_definable _) _ _).2 $
λ y yx, mem_Union.2 ⟨y, yx, choice_mem_aux x h y yx⟩
theorem choice_mem (y : Set.{u}) (yx : y ∈ x) : (choice x ′ y : Class.{u}) ∈ (y : Class.{u}) :=
begin
delta choice,
rw [map_fval yx, Class.mem_hom_left, Class.mem_hom_right],
exact choice_mem_aux x h y yx
end
end Set
|
be71c9719b68282c48591464e75d66807b499970 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /tests/lean/run/exp.lean | 0749d96fee9a9f37648ed14b324abc6b69b21757 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,669 | lean | inductive Expr : Type
| const (n : Nat)
| plus (e₁ e₂ : Expr)
| mul (e₁ e₂ : Expr)
deriving BEq, Inhabited, Repr, DecidableEq
def Expr.eval : Expr → Nat
| const n => n
| plus e₁ e₂ => eval e₁ + eval e₂
| mul e₁ e₂ => eval e₁ * eval e₂
def Expr.times : Nat → Expr → Expr
| k, const n => const (k*n)
| k, plus e₁ e₂ => plus (times k e₁) (times k e₂)
| k, mul e₁ e₂ => mul (times k e₁) e₂
theorem eval_times (k : Nat) (e : Expr) : (e.times k |>.eval) = k * e.eval := by
induction e with simp [Expr.times, Expr.eval]
| plus e₁ e₂ ih₁ ih₂ => simp [ih₁, ih₂, Nat.left_distrib]
| mul _ _ ih₁ ih₂ => simp [ih₁, Nat.mul_assoc]
def Expr.reassoc : Expr → Expr
| const n => const n
| plus e₁ e₂ =>
let e₁' := e₁.reassoc
let e₂' := e₂.reassoc
match e₂' with
| plus e₂₁ e₂₂ => plus (plus e₁' e₂₁) e₂₂
| _ => plus e₁' e₂'
| mul e₁ e₂ =>
let e₁' := e₁.reassoc
let e₂' := e₂.reassoc
match e₂' with
| mul e₂₁ e₂₂ => mul (mul e₁' e₂₁) e₂₂
| _ => mul e₁' e₂'
theorem eval_reassoc (e : Expr) : e.reassoc.eval = e.eval := by
induction e with simp [Expr.reassoc]
| plus e₁ e₂ ih₁ ih₂ =>
generalize h : (Expr.reassoc e₂) = e₂'
cases e₂' <;> rw [h] at ih₂ <;> simp [Expr.eval] at * <;> rw [← ih₂, ih₁]; rw [Nat.add_assoc]
| mul e₁ e₂ ih₁ ih₂ =>
generalize h : (Expr.reassoc e₂) = e₂'
cases e₂' <;> rw [h] at ih₂ <;> simp [Expr.eval] at * <;> rw [← ih₂, ih₁]; rw [Nat.mul_assoc]
|
1f3be75457254f30ae1216d3ebcda9ea056a0848 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/analysis/normed_space/mazur_ulam.lean | 17dc1e6cf1c6569bb6d3cd12f4d67ec81d7264d3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,046 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.instances.real_vector_space
import analysis.normed_space.add_torsor
import linear_algebra.affine_space.midpoint
/-!
# Mazur-Ulam Theorem
Mazur-Ulam theorem states that an isometric bijection between two normed affine spaces over `ℝ` is
affine. We formalize it in three definitions:
* `isometric.to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero` : given `E ≃ᵢ F` sending `0` to `0`,
returns `E ≃L[ℝ] F` with the same `to_fun` and `inv_fun`;
* `isometric.to_real_linear_equiv` : given `f : E ≃ᵢ F`,
returns `g : E ≃L[ℝ] F` with `g x = f x - f 0`.
* `isometric.to_affine_equiv` : given `PE ≃ᵢ PF`, returns `g : PE ≃ᵃ[ℝ] PF` with the same
`to_equiv`.
The formalization is based on [Jussi Väisälä, *A Proof of the Mazur-Ulam Theorem*][Vaisala_2003].
## Tags
isometry, affine map, linear map
-/
variables
{E PE : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [metric_space PE] [normed_add_torsor E PE]
{F PF : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] [metric_space PF] [normed_add_torsor F PF]
open set affine_map
noncomputable theory
namespace isometric
include E
/-- If an isometric self-homeomorphism of a normed vector space over `ℝ` fixes `x` and `y`,
then it fixes the midpoint of `[x, y]`. This is a lemma for a more general Mazur-Ulam theorem,
see below. -/
lemma midpoint_fixed {x y : PE} :
∀ e : PE ≃ᵢ PE, e x = x → e y = y → e (midpoint ℝ x y) = midpoint ℝ x y :=
begin
set z := midpoint ℝ x y,
-- Consider the set of `e : E ≃ᵢ E` such that `e x = x` and `e y = y`
set s := { e : PE ≃ᵢ PE | e x = x ∧ e y = y },
haveI : nonempty s := ⟨⟨isometric.refl PE, rfl, rfl⟩⟩,
-- On the one hand, `e` cannot send the midpoint `z` of `[x, y]` too far
have h_bdd : bdd_above (range $ λ e : s, dist (e z) z),
{ refine ⟨dist x z + dist x z, forall_range_iff.2 $ subtype.forall.2 _⟩,
rintro e ⟨hx, hy⟩,
calc dist (e z) z ≤ dist (e z) x + dist x z : dist_triangle (e z) x z
... = dist (e x) (e z) + dist x z : by rw [hx, dist_comm]
... = dist x z + dist x z : by erw [e.dist_eq x z] },
-- On the other hand, consider the map `f : (E ≃ᵢ E) → (E ≃ᵢ E)`
-- sending each `e` to `R ∘ e⁻¹ ∘ R ∘ e`, where `R` is the point reflection in the
-- midpoint `z` of `[x, y]`.
set R : PE ≃ᵢ PE := point_reflection z,
set f : (PE ≃ᵢ PE) → (PE ≃ᵢ PE) := λ e, ((e.trans R).trans e.symm).trans R,
-- Note that `f` doubles the value of ``dist (e z) z`
have hf_dist : ∀ e, dist (f e z) z = 2 * dist (e z) z,
{ intro e,
dsimp [f],
rw [dist_point_reflection_fixed, ← e.dist_eq, e.apply_symm_apply,
dist_point_reflection_self_real, dist_comm] },
-- Also note that `f` maps `s` to itself
have hf_maps_to : maps_to f s s,
{ rintros e ⟨hx, hy⟩,
split; simp [hx, hy, e.symm_apply_eq.2 hx.symm, e.symm_apply_eq.2 hy.symm], },
-- Therefore, `dist (e z) z = 0` for all `e ∈ s`.
set c := ⨆ e : s, dist (e z) z,
have : c ≤ c / 2,
{ apply csupr_le,
rintros ⟨e, he⟩,
simp only [coe_fn_coe_base, subtype.coe_mk, le_div_iff' (@zero_lt_two ℝ _ _), ← hf_dist],
exact le_csupr h_bdd ⟨f e, hf_maps_to he⟩ },
replace : c ≤ 0, { linarith },
refine λ e hx hy, dist_le_zero.1 (le_trans _ this),
exact le_csupr h_bdd ⟨e, hx, hy⟩
end
include F
/-- A bijective isometry sends midpoints to midpoints. -/
lemma map_midpoint (f : PE ≃ᵢ PF) (x y : PE) : f (midpoint ℝ x y) = midpoint ℝ (f x) (f y) :=
begin
set e : PE ≃ᵢ PE := ((f.trans $ point_reflection $ midpoint ℝ (f x) (f y)).trans f.symm).trans
(point_reflection $ midpoint ℝ x y),
have hx : e x = x, by simp,
have hy : e y = y, by simp,
have hm := e.midpoint_fixed hx hy,
simp only [e, trans_apply] at hm,
rwa [← eq_symm_apply, point_reflection_symm, point_reflection_self, symm_apply_eq,
point_reflection_fixed_iff ℝ] at hm,
apply_instance
end
/-!
Since `f : PE ≃ᵢ PF` sends midpoints to midpoints, it is an affine map.
We define a conversion to a `continuous_linear_equiv` first, then a conversion to an `affine_map`.
-/
/-- Mazur-Ulam Theorem: if `f` is an isometric bijection between two normed vector spaces
over `ℝ` and `f 0 = 0`, then `f` is a linear equivalence. -/
def to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (h0 : f 0 = 0) :
E ≃L[ℝ] F :=
{ .. (add_monoid_hom.of_map_midpoint ℝ ℝ f h0 f.map_midpoint).to_real_linear_map f.continuous,
.. f.to_homeomorph }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (h0 : f 0 = 0) :
⇑(f.to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero h0) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero_symm (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (h0 : f 0 = 0) :
⇑(f.to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero h0).symm = f.symm := rfl
/-- Mazur-Ulam Theorem: if `f` is an isometric bijection between two normed vector spaces
over `ℝ`, then `x ↦ f x - f 0` is a linear equivalence. -/
def to_real_linear_equiv (f : E ≃ᵢ F) : E ≃L[ℝ] F :=
(f.trans (isometric.add_right (f 0)).symm).to_real_linear_equiv_of_map_zero (sub_self $ f 0)
@[simp] lemma to_real_linear_equiv_apply (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (x : E) :
(f.to_real_linear_equiv : E → F) x = f x - f 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_real_linear_equiv_symm_apply (f : E ≃ᵢ F) (y : F) :
(f.to_real_linear_equiv.symm : F → E) y = f.symm (y + f 0) := rfl
/-- Convert an isometric equivalence between two affine spaces to an `affine_map`. -/
def to_affine_equiv (f : PE ≃ᵢ PF) : PE ≃ᵃ[ℝ] PF :=
affine_equiv.mk' f.to_equiv
(((vadd_const (classical.arbitrary PE)).trans $ f.trans
(vadd_const (f $ classical.arbitrary PE)).symm).to_real_linear_equiv.to_linear_equiv)
(classical.arbitrary PE) (λ p, by simp)
@[simp] lemma coe_to_affine_equiv (f : PE ≃ᵢ PF) : ⇑f.to_affine_equiv = f := rfl
end isometric
|
8f79476a3bacf440219acfa987a9d473ee47741f | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/ring_theory/power_series/basic.lean | 3ace0903b9be2ae2b176cf4941413cbbbf54e013 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 64,257 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import data.mv_polynomial
import linear_algebra.std_basis
import ring_theory.ideal.operations
import ring_theory.multiplicity
import ring_theory.algebra_tower
import tactic.linarith
import algebra.big_operators.nat_antidiagonal
/-!
# Formal power series
This file defines (multivariate) formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from polynomials to formal power series.
## Generalities
The file starts with setting up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series.
`trunc n φ` truncates a formal power series to the polynomial
that has the same coefficients as `φ`, for all `m ≤ n`, and `0` otherwise.
If the constant coefficient of a formal power series is invertible,
then this formal power series is invertible.
Formal power series over a local ring form a local ring.
## Formal power series in one variable
We prove that if the ring of coefficients is an integral domain,
then formal power series in one variable form an integral domain.
The `order` of a formal power series `φ` is the multiplicity of the variable `X` in `φ`.
If the coefficients form an integral domain, then `order` is a valuation
(`order_mul`, `le_order_add`).
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`mv_power_series σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
Formal power series in one variable are defined as
`power_series R := mv_power_series unit R`.
This allows us to port a lot of proofs and properties
from the multivariate case to the single variable case.
However, it means that formal power series are indexed by `unit →₀ ℕ`,
which is of course canonically isomorphic to `ℕ`.
We then build some glue to treat formal power series as if they are indexed by `ℕ`.
Occasionally this leads to proofs that are uglier than expected.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring.-/
def mv_power_series (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R
namespace mv_power_series
open finsupp
variables {σ R : Type*}
instance [inhabited R] : inhabited (mv_power_series σ R) := ⟨λ _, default _⟩
instance [has_zero R] : has_zero (mv_power_series σ R) := pi.has_zero
instance [add_monoid R] : add_monoid (mv_power_series σ R) := pi.add_monoid
instance [add_group R] : add_group (mv_power_series σ R) := pi.add_group
instance [add_comm_monoid R] : add_comm_monoid (mv_power_series σ R) := pi.add_comm_monoid
instance [add_comm_group R] : add_comm_group (mv_power_series σ R) := pi.add_comm_group
instance [nontrivial R] : nontrivial (mv_power_series σ R) := function.nontrivial
instance {A} [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid A] [module R A] :
module R (mv_power_series σ A) := pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [semiring R] [semiring S] [add_comm_monoid A] [module R A] [module S A]
[has_scalar R S] [is_scalar_tower R S A] :
is_scalar_tower R S (mv_power_series σ A) :=
pi.is_scalar_tower
section semiring
variables (R) [semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial with coefficient `a` as multivariate formal power series.-/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] mv_power_series σ R :=
linear_map.std_basis R _ n
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series.-/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (mv_power_series σ R) →ₗ[R] R := linear_map.proj n
variables {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal.-/
@[ext] lemma ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ (n : σ →₀ ℕ), coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) :
φ = ψ :=
funext h
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal.-/
lemma ext_iff {φ ψ : mv_power_series σ R} :
φ = ψ ↔ (∀ (n : σ →₀ ℕ), coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) :=
function.funext_iff
lemma coeff_monomial (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 :=
by rw [coeff, monomial, linear_map.proj_apply, linear_map.std_basis_apply, function.update_apply,
pi.zero_apply]
@[simp] lemma coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a :=
linear_map.std_basis_same R _ n a
lemma coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 :=
linear_map.std_basis_ne R _ _ _ h a
lemma eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra $ λ h', h $ coeff_monomial_ne h' a
@[simp] lemma coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = linear_map.id :=
linear_map.ext $ coeff_monomial_same n
@[simp] lemma coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : mv_power_series σ R) = 0 := rfl
variables (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : mv_power_series σ R)
instance : has_one (mv_power_series σ R) := ⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
lemma coeff_one :
coeff R n (1 : mv_power_series σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
lemma coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
lemma monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 := rfl
instance : has_mul (mv_power_series σ R) :=
⟨λ φ ψ n, ∑ p in finsupp.antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
lemma coeff_mul : coeff R n (φ * ψ) =
∑ p in finsupp.antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := rfl
protected lemma zero_mul : (0 : mv_power_series σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext $ λ n, by simp [coeff_mul]
protected lemma mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext $ λ n, by simp [coeff_mul]
lemma coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 :=
begin
have : ∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
λ p _ hp, eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp),
rw [coeff_mul, ← finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, antidiagonal_filter_fst_eq,
finset.sum_ite_index],
simp only [finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, finset.sum_empty]
end
lemma coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 :=
begin
have : ∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
λ p _ hp, eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp),
rw [coeff_mul, ← finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, antidiagonal_filter_snd_eq,
finset.sum_ite_index],
simp only [finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, finset.sum_empty]
end
lemma coeff_add_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (monomial R m a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ :=
begin
rw [coeff_monomial_mul, if_pos, nat_add_sub_cancel_left],
exact le_add_right le_rfl
end
lemma coeff_add_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (φ * monomial R n a) = coeff R m φ * a :=
begin
rw [coeff_mul_monomial, if_pos, nat_add_sub_cancel],
exact le_add_left le_rfl
end
protected lemma one_mul : (1 : mv_power_series σ R) * φ = φ :=
ext $ λ n, by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ 1
protected lemma mul_one : φ * 1 = φ :=
ext $ λ n, by simpa using coeff_add_mul_monomial n 0 φ 1
protected lemma mul_add (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : mv_power_series σ R) :
φ₁ * (φ₂ + φ₃) = φ₁ * φ₂ + φ₁ * φ₃ :=
ext $ λ n, by simp only [coeff_mul, mul_add, finset.sum_add_distrib, linear_map.map_add]
protected lemma add_mul (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : mv_power_series σ R) :
(φ₁ + φ₂) * φ₃ = φ₁ * φ₃ + φ₂ * φ₃ :=
ext $ λ n, by simp only [coeff_mul, add_mul, finset.sum_add_distrib, linear_map.map_add]
protected lemma mul_assoc (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : mv_power_series σ R) :
(φ₁ * φ₂) * φ₃ = φ₁ * (φ₂ * φ₃) :=
begin
ext1 n,
simp only [coeff_mul, finset.sum_mul, finset.mul_sum, finset.sum_sigma'],
refine finset.sum_bij (λ p _, ⟨(p.2.1, p.2.2 + p.1.2), (p.2.2, p.1.2)⟩) _ _ _ _;
simp only [mem_antidiagonal, finset.mem_sigma, heq_iff_eq, prod.mk.inj_iff, and_imp,
exists_prop],
{ rintros ⟨⟨i,j⟩, ⟨k,l⟩⟩, dsimp only, rintro rfl rfl,
simp [add_assoc] },
{ rintros ⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨c, d⟩⟩, dsimp only, rintro rfl rfl,
apply mul_assoc },
{ rintros ⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨c, d⟩⟩ ⟨⟨i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩, dsimp only, rintro rfl rfl - rfl rfl - rfl rfl,
refl },
{ rintro ⟨⟨i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩, dsimp only, rintro rfl rfl,
refine ⟨⟨(i + k, l), (i, k)⟩, _, _⟩; simp [add_assoc] }
end
instance : semiring (mv_power_series σ R) :=
{ mul_one := mv_power_series.mul_one,
one_mul := mv_power_series.one_mul,
mul_assoc := mv_power_series.mul_assoc,
mul_zero := mv_power_series.mul_zero,
zero_mul := mv_power_series.zero_mul,
left_distrib := mv_power_series.mul_add,
right_distrib := mv_power_series.add_mul,
.. mv_power_series.has_one,
.. mv_power_series.has_mul,
.. mv_power_series.add_comm_monoid }
end semiring
instance [comm_semiring R] : comm_semiring (mv_power_series σ R) :=
{ mul_comm := λ φ ψ, ext $ λ n, by simpa only [coeff_mul, mul_comm]
using sum_antidiagonal_swap n (λ a b, coeff R a φ * coeff R b ψ),
.. mv_power_series.semiring }
instance [ring R] : ring (mv_power_series σ R) :=
{ .. mv_power_series.semiring,
.. mv_power_series.add_comm_group }
instance [comm_ring R] : comm_ring (mv_power_series σ R) :=
{ .. mv_power_series.comm_semiring,
.. mv_power_series.add_comm_group }
section semiring
variables [semiring R]
lemma monomial_mul_monomial (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a b : R) :
monomial R m a * monomial R n b = monomial R (m + n) (a * b) :=
begin
ext k,
simp only [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial],
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₃ h₂; try { refl },
{ rw [← h₂, nat_sub_add_cancel h₁] at h₃, exact (h₃ rfl).elim },
{ rw [h₃, nat_add_sub_cancel] at h₂, exact (h₂ rfl).elim },
{ exact zero_mul b },
{ rw h₂ at h₁, exact (h₁ $ le_add_left le_rfl).elim }
end
variables (σ) (R)
/-- The constant multivariate formal power series.-/
def C : R →+* mv_power_series σ R :=
{ map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ a b, (monomial_mul_monomial 0 0 a b).symm,
map_zero' := (monomial R (0 : _)).map_zero,
.. monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) }
variables {σ} {R}
@[simp] lemma monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)) = C σ R := rfl
lemma monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) a = C σ R a := rfl
lemma coeff_C (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C σ R a) = if n = 0 then a else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
lemma coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ℕ) (C σ R a) = a :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 a
/-- The variables of the multivariate formal power series ring.-/
def X (s : σ) : mv_power_series σ R := monomial R (single s 1) 1
lemma coeff_X (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : σ) :
coeff R n (X s : mv_power_series σ R) = if n = (single s 1) then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
lemma coeff_index_single_X (s t : σ) :
coeff R (single t 1) (X s : mv_power_series σ R) = if t = s then 1 else 0 :=
by { simp only [coeff_X, single_left_inj one_ne_zero], split_ifs; refl }
@[simp] lemma coeff_index_single_self_X (s : σ) :
coeff R (single s 1) (X s : mv_power_series σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same _ _
lemma coeff_zero_X (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (X s : mv_power_series σ R) = 0 :=
by { rw [coeff_X, if_neg], intro h, exact one_ne_zero (single_eq_zero.mp h.symm) }
lemma X_def (s : σ) : X s = monomial R (single s 1) 1 := rfl
lemma X_pow_eq (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s : mv_power_series σ R)^n = monomial R (single s n) 1 :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ rw [pow_zero, finsupp.single_zero, monomial_zero_one] },
{ rw [pow_succ', ih, nat.succ_eq_add_one, finsupp.single_add, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul] }
end
lemma coeff_X_pow (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R m ((X s : mv_power_series σ R)^n) = if m = single s n then 1 else 0 :=
by rw [X_pow_eq s n, coeff_monomial]
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_C (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (φ * C σ R a) = coeff R n φ * a :=
by simpa using coeff_add_mul_monomial n 0 φ a
@[simp] lemma coeff_C_mul (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C σ R a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ :=
by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ a
lemma coeff_zero_mul_X (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (s : σ) :
coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ * X s) = 0 :=
begin
have : ¬single s 1 ≤ 0, from λ h, by simpa using h s,
simp only [X, coeff_mul_monomial, if_neg this]
end
lemma coeff_zero_X_mul (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (s : σ) :
coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (X s * φ) = 0 :=
begin
have : ¬single s 1 ≤ 0, from λ h, by simpa using h s,
simp only [X, coeff_monomial_mul, if_neg this]
end
variables (σ) (R)
/-- The constant coefficient of a formal power series.-/
def constant_coeff : (mv_power_series σ R) →+* R :=
{ to_fun := coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ),
map_one' := coeff_zero_one,
map_mul' := λ φ ψ, by simp [coeff_mul, support_single_ne_zero],
map_zero' := linear_map.map_zero _,
.. coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) }
variables {σ} {R}
@[simp] lemma coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff :
⇑(coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)) = constant_coeff σ R := rfl
lemma coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff_apply (φ : mv_power_series σ R) :
coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) φ = constant_coeff σ R φ := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_C (a : R) : constant_coeff σ R (C σ R a) = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_comp_C :
(constant_coeff σ R).comp (C σ R) = ring_hom.id R := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_zero : constant_coeff σ R 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_one : constant_coeff σ R 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_X (s : σ) : constant_coeff σ R (X s) = 0 := coeff_zero_X s
/-- If a multivariate formal power series is invertible,
then so is its constant coefficient.-/
lemma is_unit_constant_coeff (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (h : is_unit φ) :
is_unit (constant_coeff σ R φ) :=
h.map' (constant_coeff σ R)
@[simp]
lemma coeff_smul (f : mv_power_series σ R) (n) (a : R) :
coeff _ n (a • f) = a * coeff _ n f :=
rfl
lemma X_inj [nontrivial R] {s t : σ} : (X s : mv_power_series σ R) = X t ↔ s = t :=
⟨begin
intro h, replace h := congr_arg (coeff R (single s 1)) h, rw [coeff_X, if_pos rfl, coeff_X] at h,
split_ifs at h with H,
{ rw finsupp.single_eq_single_iff at H,
cases H, { exact H.1 }, { exfalso, exact one_ne_zero H.1 } },
{ exfalso, exact one_ne_zero h }
end, congr_arg X⟩
end semiring
section map
variables {S T : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S] [semiring T]
variables (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T)
variable (σ)
/-- The map between multivariate formal power series induced by a map on the coefficients.-/
def map : mv_power_series σ R →+* mv_power_series σ S :=
{ to_fun := λ φ n, f $ coeff R n φ,
map_zero' := ext $ λ n, f.map_zero,
map_one' := ext $ λ n, show f ((coeff R n) 1) = (coeff S n) 1,
by { rw [coeff_one, coeff_one], split_ifs; simp [f.map_one, f.map_zero] },
map_add' := λ φ ψ, ext $ λ n,
show f ((coeff R n) (φ + ψ)) = f ((coeff R n) φ) + f ((coeff R n) ψ), by simp,
map_mul' := λ φ ψ, ext $ λ n, show f _ = _,
begin
rw [coeff_mul, ← finset.sum_hom _ f, coeff_mul, finset.sum_congr rfl],
rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij, rw [f.map_mul], refl,
end }
variable {σ}
@[simp] lemma map_id : map σ (ring_hom.id R) = ring_hom.id _ := rfl
lemma map_comp : map σ (g.comp f) = (map σ g).comp (map σ f) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coeff_map (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : mv_power_series σ R) :
coeff S n (map σ f φ) = f (coeff R n φ) := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_map (φ : mv_power_series σ R) :
constant_coeff σ S (map σ f φ) = f (constant_coeff σ R φ) := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
map σ f (monomial R n a) = monomial S n (f a) :=
by { ext m, simp [coeff_monomial, apply_ite f] }
@[simp] lemma map_C (a : R) : map σ f (C σ R a) = C σ S (f a) :=
map_monomial _ _ _
@[simp] lemma map_X (s : σ) : map σ f (X s) = X s := by simp [X]
end map
section algebra
variables {A : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
instance : algebra R (mv_power_series σ A) :=
{ commutes' := λ a φ, by { ext n, simp [algebra.commutes] },
smul_def' := λ a σ, by { ext n, simp [(coeff A n).map_smul_of_tower a, algebra.smul_def] },
to_ring_hom := (mv_power_series.map σ (algebra_map R A)).comp (C σ R),
.. mv_power_series.module }
theorem C_eq_algebra_map : C σ R = (algebra_map R (mv_power_series σ R)) := rfl
theorem algebra_map_apply {r : R} :
algebra_map R (mv_power_series σ A) r = C σ A (algebra_map R A r) :=
begin
change (mv_power_series.map σ (algebra_map R A)).comp (C σ R) r = _,
simp,
end
instance [nonempty σ] [nontrivial R] : nontrivial (subalgebra R (mv_power_series σ R)) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, begin
rw [ne.def, set_like.ext_iff, not_forall],
inhabit σ,
refine ⟨X (default σ), _⟩,
simp only [algebra.mem_bot, not_exists, set.mem_range, iff_true, algebra.mem_top],
intros x,
rw [ext_iff, not_forall],
refine ⟨finsupp.single (default σ) 1, _⟩,
simp [algebra_map_apply, coeff_C],
end⟩⟩
end algebra
section trunc
variables [comm_semiring R] (n : σ →₀ ℕ)
/-- Auxiliary definition for the truncation function. -/
def trunc_fun (φ : mv_power_series σ R) : mv_polynomial σ R :=
∑ m in Iic_finset n, mv_polynomial.monomial m (coeff R m φ)
lemma coeff_trunc_fun (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : mv_power_series σ R) :
(trunc_fun n φ).coeff m = if m ≤ n then coeff R m φ else 0 :=
by simp [trunc_fun, mv_polynomial.coeff_sum]
variable (R)
/-- The `n`th truncation of a multivariate formal power series to a multivariate polynomial -/
def trunc : mv_power_series σ R →+ mv_polynomial σ R :=
{ to_fun := trunc_fun n,
map_zero' := by { ext, simp [coeff_trunc_fun] },
map_add' := by { intros, ext, simp [coeff_trunc_fun, ite_add], split_ifs; refl } }
variable {R}
lemma coeff_trunc (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : mv_power_series σ R) :
(trunc R n φ).coeff m = if m ≤ n then coeff R m φ else 0 :=
by simp [trunc, coeff_trunc_fun]
@[simp] lemma trunc_one : trunc R n 1 = 1 :=
mv_polynomial.ext _ _ $ λ m,
begin
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_one],
split_ifs with H H' H',
{ subst m, erw mv_polynomial.coeff_C 0, simp },
{ symmetry, erw mv_polynomial.coeff_monomial, convert if_neg (ne.elim (ne.symm H')), },
{ symmetry, erw mv_polynomial.coeff_monomial, convert if_neg _,
intro H', apply H, subst m, intro s, exact nat.zero_le _ }
end
@[simp] lemma trunc_C (a : R) : trunc R n (C σ R a) = mv_polynomial.C a :=
mv_polynomial.ext _ _ $ λ m,
begin
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_C, mv_polynomial.coeff_C],
split_ifs with H; refl <|> try {simp * at *},
exfalso, apply H, subst m, intro s, exact nat.zero_le _
end
end trunc
section comm_semiring
variable [comm_semiring R]
lemma X_pow_dvd_iff {s : σ} {n : ℕ} {φ : mv_power_series σ R} :
(X s : mv_power_series σ R)^n ∣ φ ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m s < n → coeff R m φ = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨φ, rfl⟩ m h,
rw [coeff_mul, finset.sum_eq_zero],
rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij, rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, zero_mul],
contrapose! h, subst i, rw finsupp.mem_antidiagonal at hij,
rw [← hij, finsupp.add_apply, finsupp.single_eq_same], exact nat.le_add_right n _ },
{ intro h, refine ⟨λ m, coeff R (m + (single s n)) φ, _⟩,
ext m, by_cases H : m - single s n + single s n = m,
{ rw [coeff_mul, finset.sum_eq_single (single s n, m - single s n)],
{ rw [coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, one_mul],
simpa using congr_arg (λ (m : σ →₀ ℕ), coeff R m φ) H.symm },
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij hne, rw finsupp.mem_antidiagonal at hij,
rw coeff_X_pow, split_ifs with hi,
{ exfalso, apply hne, rw [← hij, ← hi, prod.mk.inj_iff], refine ⟨rfl, _⟩,
ext t, simp only [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, finsupp.add_apply, finsupp.nat_sub_apply] },
{ exact zero_mul _ } },
{ intro hni, exfalso, apply hni, rwa [finsupp.mem_antidiagonal, add_comm] } },
{ rw [h, coeff_mul, finset.sum_eq_zero],
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij, rw finsupp.mem_antidiagonal at hij,
rw coeff_X_pow, split_ifs with hi,
{ exfalso, apply H, rw [← hij, hi], ext,
rw [coe_add, coe_add, pi.add_apply, pi.add_apply, nat_add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm], },
{ exact zero_mul _ } },
{ classical, contrapose! H, ext t,
by_cases hst : s = t,
{ subst t, simpa using nat.sub_add_cancel H },
{ simp [finsupp.single_apply, hst] } } } }
end
lemma X_dvd_iff {s : σ} {φ : mv_power_series σ R} :
(X s : mv_power_series σ R) ∣ φ ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m s = 0 → coeff R m φ = 0 :=
begin
rw [← pow_one (X s : mv_power_series σ R), X_pow_dvd_iff],
split; intros h m hm,
{ exact h m (hm.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) },
{ exact h m (nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hm) }
end
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [ring R]
/-
The inverse of a multivariate formal power series is defined by
well-founded recursion on the coeffients of the inverse.
-/
/-- Auxiliary definition that unifies
the totalised inverse formal power series `(_)⁻¹` and
the inverse formal power series that depends on
an inverse of the constant coefficient `inv_of_unit`.-/
protected noncomputable def inv.aux (a : R) (φ : mv_power_series σ R) : mv_power_series σ R
| n := if n = 0 then a else
- a * ∑ x in n.antidiagonal,
if h : x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * inv.aux x.2 else 0
using_well_founded
{ rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, finsupp.lt_wf σ⟩],
dec_tac := tactic.assumption }
lemma coeff_inv_aux (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (φ : mv_power_series σ R) :
coeff R n (inv.aux a φ) = if n = 0 then a else
- a * ∑ x in n.antidiagonal,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv.aux a φ) else 0 :=
show inv.aux a φ n = _, by { rw inv.aux, refl }
/-- A multivariate formal power series is invertible if the constant coefficient is invertible.-/
def inv_of_unit (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (u : units R) : mv_power_series σ R :=
inv.aux (↑u⁻¹) φ
lemma coeff_inv_of_unit (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (u : units R) :
coeff R n (inv_of_unit φ u) = if n = 0 then ↑u⁻¹ else
- ↑u⁻¹ * ∑ x in n.antidiagonal,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv_of_unit φ u) else 0 :=
coeff_inv_aux n (↑u⁻¹) φ
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_inv_of_unit (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (u : units R) :
constant_coeff σ R (inv_of_unit φ u) = ↑u⁻¹ :=
by rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff_apply, coeff_inv_of_unit, if_pos rfl]
lemma mul_inv_of_unit (φ : mv_power_series σ R) (u : units R) (h : constant_coeff σ R φ = u) :
φ * inv_of_unit φ u = 1 :=
ext $ λ n, if H : n = 0 then by { rw H, simp [coeff_mul, support_single_ne_zero, h], }
else
begin
have : ((0 : σ →₀ ℕ), n) ∈ n.antidiagonal,
{ rw [finsupp.mem_antidiagonal, zero_add] },
rw [coeff_one, if_neg H, coeff_mul,
← finset.insert_erase this, finset.sum_insert (finset.not_mem_erase _ _),
coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff_apply, h, coeff_inv_of_unit, if_neg H,
neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm, units.mul_inv_cancel_left,
← finset.insert_erase this, finset.sum_insert (finset.not_mem_erase _ _),
finset.insert_erase this, if_neg (not_lt_of_ge $ le_refl _), zero_add, add_comm,
← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_zero, finset.sum_congr rfl],
rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij, rw [finset.mem_erase, finsupp.mem_antidiagonal] at hij,
cases hij with h₁ h₂,
subst n, rw if_pos,
suffices : (0 : _) + j < i + j, {simpa},
apply add_lt_add_right,
split,
{ intro s, exact nat.zero_le _ },
{ intro H, apply h₁,
suffices : i = 0, {simp [this]},
ext1 s, exact nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (H s) }
end
end ring
section comm_ring
variable [comm_ring R]
/-- Multivariate formal power series over a local ring form a local ring. -/
instance is_local_ring [local_ring R] : local_ring (mv_power_series σ R) :=
{ is_local := by { intro φ, rcases local_ring.is_local (constant_coeff σ R φ) with ⟨u,h⟩|⟨u,h⟩;
[left, right];
{ refine is_unit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (mul_inv_of_unit _ u _),
simpa using h.symm } } }
-- TODO(jmc): once adic topology lands, show that this is complete
end comm_ring
section local_ring
variables {S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S)
[is_local_ring_hom f]
-- Thanks to the linter for informing us that this instance does
-- not actually need R and S to be local rings!
/-- The map `A[[X]] → B[[X]]` induced by a local ring hom `A → B` is local -/
instance map.is_local_ring_hom : is_local_ring_hom (map σ f) :=
⟨begin
rintros φ ⟨ψ, h⟩,
replace h := congr_arg (constant_coeff σ S) h,
rw constant_coeff_map at h,
have : is_unit (constant_coeff σ S ↑ψ) := @is_unit_constant_coeff σ S _ (↑ψ) ψ.is_unit,
rw h at this,
rcases is_unit_of_map_unit f _ this with ⟨c, hc⟩,
exact is_unit_of_mul_eq_one φ (inv_of_unit φ c) (mul_inv_of_unit φ c hc.symm)
end⟩
variables [local_ring R] [local_ring S]
instance : local_ring (mv_power_series σ R) :=
{ is_local := local_ring.is_local }
end local_ring
section field
variables {k : Type*} [field k]
/-- The inverse `1/f` of a multivariable power series `f` over a field -/
protected def inv (φ : mv_power_series σ k) : mv_power_series σ k :=
inv.aux (constant_coeff σ k φ)⁻¹ φ
instance : has_inv (mv_power_series σ k) := ⟨mv_power_series.inv⟩
lemma coeff_inv (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : mv_power_series σ k) :
coeff k n (φ⁻¹) = if n = 0 then (constant_coeff σ k φ)⁻¹ else
- (constant_coeff σ k φ)⁻¹ * ∑ x in n.antidiagonal,
if x.2 < n then coeff k x.1 φ * coeff k x.2 (φ⁻¹) else 0 :=
coeff_inv_aux n _ φ
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_inv (φ : mv_power_series σ k) :
constant_coeff σ k (φ⁻¹) = (constant_coeff σ k φ)⁻¹ :=
by rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff_apply, coeff_inv, if_pos rfl]
lemma inv_eq_zero {φ : mv_power_series σ k} :
φ⁻¹ = 0 ↔ constant_coeff σ k φ = 0 :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using congr_arg (constant_coeff σ k) h,
λ h, ext $ λ n, by { rw coeff_inv, split_ifs;
simp only [h, mv_power_series.coeff_zero, zero_mul, inv_zero, neg_zero] }⟩
@[simp, priority 1100]
lemma inv_of_unit_eq (φ : mv_power_series σ k) (h : constant_coeff σ k φ ≠ 0) :
inv_of_unit φ (units.mk0 _ h) = φ⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma inv_of_unit_eq' (φ : mv_power_series σ k) (u : units k) (h : constant_coeff σ k φ = u) :
inv_of_unit φ u = φ⁻¹ :=
begin
rw ← inv_of_unit_eq φ (h.symm ▸ u.ne_zero),
congr' 1, rw [units.ext_iff], exact h.symm,
end
@[simp] protected lemma mul_inv (φ : mv_power_series σ k) (h : constant_coeff σ k φ ≠ 0) :
φ * φ⁻¹ = 1 :=
by rw [← inv_of_unit_eq φ h, mul_inv_of_unit φ (units.mk0 _ h) rfl]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_mul (φ : mv_power_series σ k) (h : constant_coeff σ k φ ≠ 0) :
φ⁻¹ * φ = 1 :=
by rw [mul_comm, φ.mul_inv h]
protected lemma eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq {φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : mv_power_series σ k}
(h : constant_coeff σ k φ₃ ≠ 0) :
φ₁ = φ₂ * φ₃⁻¹ ↔ φ₁ * φ₃ = φ₂ :=
⟨λ k, by simp [k, mul_assoc, mv_power_series.inv_mul _ h],
λ k, by simp [← k, mul_assoc, mv_power_series.mul_inv _ h]⟩
protected lemma eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one {φ ψ : mv_power_series σ k} (h : constant_coeff σ k ψ ≠ 0) :
φ = ψ⁻¹ ↔ φ * ψ = 1 :=
by rw [← mv_power_series.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq h, one_mul]
protected lemma inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one {φ ψ : mv_power_series σ k} (h : constant_coeff σ k ψ ≠ 0) :
ψ⁻¹ = φ ↔ φ * ψ = 1 :=
by rw [eq_comm, mv_power_series.eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one h]
end field
end mv_power_series
namespace mv_polynomial
open finsupp
variables {σ : Type*} {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
/-- The natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials into multivariate formal power series.-/
instance coe_to_mv_power_series : has_coe (mv_polynomial σ R) (mv_power_series σ R) :=
⟨λ φ n, coeff n φ⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coeff_coe (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
mv_power_series.coeff R n ↑φ = coeff n φ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
(monomial n a : mv_power_series σ R) = mv_power_series.monomial R n a :=
mv_power_series.ext $ λ m,
begin
rw [coeff_coe, coeff_monomial, mv_power_series.coeff_monomial],
split_ifs with h₁ h₂; refl <|> subst m; contradiction
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : mv_polynomial σ R) : mv_power_series σ R) = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : mv_polynomial σ R) : mv_power_series σ R) = 1 :=
coe_monomial _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (φ ψ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
((φ + ψ : mv_polynomial σ R) : mv_power_series σ R) = φ + ψ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul (φ ψ : mv_polynomial σ R) :
((φ * ψ : mv_polynomial σ R) : mv_power_series σ R) = φ * ψ :=
mv_power_series.ext $ λ n,
by simp only [coeff_coe, mv_power_series.coeff_mul, coeff_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_C (a : R) :
((C a : mv_polynomial σ R) : mv_power_series σ R) = mv_power_series.C σ R a :=
coe_monomial _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_X (s : σ) :
((X s : mv_polynomial σ R) : mv_power_series σ R) = mv_power_series.X s :=
coe_monomial _ _
/--
The coercion from multivariable polynomials to multivariable power series
as a ring homomorphism.
-/
-- TODO as an algebra homomorphism?
def coe_to_mv_power_series.ring_hom : mv_polynomial σ R →+* mv_power_series σ R :=
{ to_fun := (coe : mv_polynomial σ R → mv_power_series σ R),
map_zero' := coe_zero,
map_one' := coe_one,
map_add' := coe_add,
map_mul' := coe_mul }
end mv_polynomial
/-- Formal power series over the coefficient ring `R`.-/
def power_series (R : Type*) := mv_power_series unit R
namespace power_series
open finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section
local attribute [reducible] power_series
instance [inhabited R] : inhabited (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [add_monoid R] : add_monoid (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [add_group R] : add_group (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [add_comm_monoid R] : add_comm_monoid (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [add_comm_group R] : add_comm_group (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [semiring R] : semiring (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [comm_semiring R] : comm_semiring (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [ring R] : ring (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [comm_ring R] : comm_ring (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance [nontrivial R] : nontrivial (power_series R) := by apply_instance
instance {A} [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid A] [module R A] :
module R (power_series A) := by apply_instance
instance {A S} [semiring R] [semiring S] [add_comm_monoid A] [module R A] [module S A]
[has_scalar R S] [is_scalar_tower R S A] :
is_scalar_tower R S (power_series A) :=
pi.is_scalar_tower
instance {A} [semiring A] [comm_semiring R] [algebra R A] :
algebra R (power_series A) := by apply_instance
end
section semiring
variables (R) [semiring R]
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.-/
def coeff (n : ℕ) : power_series R →ₗ[R] R := mv_power_series.coeff R (single () n)
/-- The `n`th monomial with coefficient `a` as formal power series.-/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] power_series R := mv_power_series.monomial R (single () n)
variables {R}
lemma coeff_def {s : unit →₀ ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : s () = n) :
coeff R n = mv_power_series.coeff R s :=
by erw [coeff, ← h, ← finsupp.unique_single s]
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal.-/
@[ext] lemma ext {φ ψ : power_series R} (h : ∀ n, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) :
φ = ψ :=
mv_power_series.ext $ λ n,
by { rw ← coeff_def, { apply h }, refl }
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal.-/
lemma ext_iff {φ ψ : power_series R} : φ = ψ ↔ (∀ n, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) :=
⟨λ h n, congr_arg (coeff R n) h, ext⟩
/-- Constructor for formal power series.-/
def mk {R} (f : ℕ → R) : power_series R := λ s, f (s ())
@[simp] lemma coeff_mk (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R) : coeff R n (mk f) = f n :=
congr_arg f finsupp.single_eq_same
lemma coeff_monomial (m n : ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 :=
calc coeff R m (monomial R n a) = _ : mv_power_series.coeff_monomial _ _ _
... = if m = n then a else 0 :
by { simp only [finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff], split_ifs; refl }
lemma monomial_eq_mk (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial R n a = mk (λ m, if m = n then a else 0) :=
ext $ λ m, by { rw [coeff_monomial, coeff_mk] }
@[simp] lemma coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a :=
mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_same _ _
@[simp] lemma coeff_comp_monomial (n : ℕ) :
(coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = linear_map.id :=
linear_map.ext $ coeff_monomial_same n
variable (R)
/--The constant coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def constant_coeff : power_series R →+* R := mv_power_series.constant_coeff unit R
/-- The constant formal power series.-/
def C : R →+* power_series R := mv_power_series.C unit R
variable {R}
/-- The variable of the formal power series ring.-/
def X : power_series R := mv_power_series.X ()
@[simp] lemma coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff :
⇑(coeff R 0) = constant_coeff R :=
by { rw [coeff, finsupp.single_zero], refl }
lemma coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff_apply (φ : power_series R) :
coeff R 0 φ = constant_coeff R φ :=
by rw [coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff]; refl
@[simp] lemma monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R 0) = C R :=
by rw [monomial, finsupp.single_zero, mv_power_series.monomial_zero_eq_C, C]
lemma monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R 0 a = C R a :=
by simp
lemma coeff_C (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C R a : power_series R) = if n = 0 then a else 0 :=
by rw [← monomial_zero_eq_C_apply, coeff_monomial]
lemma coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R 0 (C R a) = a :=
by rw [← monomial_zero_eq_C_apply, coeff_monomial_same 0 a]
lemma X_eq : (X : power_series R) = monomial R 1 1 := rfl
lemma coeff_X (n : ℕ) :
coeff R n (X : power_series R) = if n = 1 then 1 else 0 :=
by rw [X_eq, coeff_monomial]
lemma coeff_zero_X : coeff R 0 (X : power_series R) = 0 :=
by rw [coeff, finsupp.single_zero, X, mv_power_series.coeff_zero_X]
@[simp] lemma coeff_one_X : coeff R 1 (X : power_series R) = 1 :=
by rw [coeff_X, if_pos rfl]
lemma X_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (X : power_series R)^n = monomial R n 1 :=
mv_power_series.X_pow_eq _ n
lemma coeff_X_pow (m n : ℕ) :
coeff R m ((X : power_series R)^n) = if m = n then 1 else 0 :=
by rw [X_pow_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp] lemma coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) :
coeff R n ((X : power_series R)^n) = 1 :=
by rw [coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] lemma coeff_one (n : ℕ) :
coeff R n (1 : power_series R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
calc coeff R n (1 : power_series R) = _ : mv_power_series.coeff_one _
... = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :
by { simp only [finsupp.single_eq_zero], split_ifs; refl }
lemma coeff_zero_one : coeff R 0 (1 : power_series R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
lemma coeff_mul (n : ℕ) (φ ψ : power_series R) :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p in finset.nat.antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ :=
begin
symmetry,
apply finset.sum_bij (λ (p : ℕ × ℕ) h, (single () p.1, single () p.2)),
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij, rw finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal at hij,
rw [finsupp.mem_antidiagonal, ← finsupp.single_add, hij], },
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij, refl },
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ ⟨k,l⟩ hij hkl,
simpa only [prod.mk.inj_iff, finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff] using id },
{ rintros ⟨f,g⟩ hfg,
refine ⟨(f (), g ()), _, _⟩,
{ rw finsupp.mem_antidiagonal at hfg,
rw [finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal, ← finsupp.add_apply, hfg, finsupp.single_eq_same] },
{ rw prod.mk.inj_iff, dsimp,
exact ⟨finsupp.unique_single f, finsupp.unique_single g⟩ } }
end
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_C (n : ℕ) (φ : power_series R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (φ * C R a) = coeff R n φ * a :=
mv_power_series.coeff_mul_C _ φ a
@[simp] lemma coeff_C_mul (n : ℕ) (φ : power_series R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C R a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ :=
mv_power_series.coeff_C_mul _ φ a
@[simp] lemma coeff_smul (n : ℕ) (φ : power_series R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (a • φ) = a * coeff R n φ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coeff_succ_mul_X (n : ℕ) (φ : power_series R) :
coeff R (n+1) (φ * X) = coeff R n φ :=
begin
simp only [coeff, finsupp.single_add],
convert φ.coeff_add_mul_monomial (single () n) (single () 1) _,
rw mul_one
end
@[simp] lemma coeff_succ_X_mul (n : ℕ) (φ : power_series R) :
coeff R (n + 1) (X * φ) = coeff R n φ :=
begin
simp only [coeff, finsupp.single_add, add_comm n 1],
convert φ.coeff_add_monomial_mul (single () 1) (single () n) _,
rw one_mul,
end
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_C (a : R) : constant_coeff R (C R a) = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_comp_C :
(constant_coeff R).comp (C R) = ring_hom.id R := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_zero : constant_coeff R 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_one : constant_coeff R 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_X : constant_coeff R X = 0 := mv_power_series.coeff_zero_X _
lemma coeff_zero_mul_X (φ : power_series R) : coeff R 0 (φ * X) = 0 := by simp
lemma coeff_zero_X_mul (φ : power_series R) : coeff R 0 (X * φ) = 0 := by simp
/-- If a formal power series is invertible, then so is its constant coefficient.-/
lemma is_unit_constant_coeff (φ : power_series R) (h : is_unit φ) :
is_unit (constant_coeff R φ) :=
mv_power_series.is_unit_constant_coeff φ h
/-- Split off the constant coefficient. -/
lemma eq_shift_mul_X_add_const (φ : power_series R) :
φ = mk (λ p, coeff R (p + 1) φ) * X + C R (constant_coeff R φ) :=
begin
ext (_ | n),
{ simp only [ring_hom.map_add, constant_coeff_C, constant_coeff_X, coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff,
zero_add, mul_zero, ring_hom.map_mul], },
{ simp only [coeff_succ_mul_X, coeff_mk, linear_map.map_add, coeff_C, n.succ_ne_zero, sub_zero,
if_false, add_zero], }
end
/-- Split off the constant coefficient. -/
lemma eq_X_mul_shift_add_const (φ : power_series R) :
φ = X * mk (λ p, coeff R (p + 1) φ) + C R (constant_coeff R φ) :=
begin
ext (_ | n),
{ simp only [ring_hom.map_add, constant_coeff_C, constant_coeff_X, coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff,
zero_add, zero_mul, ring_hom.map_mul], },
{ simp only [coeff_succ_X_mul, coeff_mk, linear_map.map_add, coeff_C, n.succ_ne_zero, sub_zero,
if_false, add_zero], }
end
section map
variables {S : Type*} {T : Type*} [semiring S] [semiring T]
variables (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T)
/-- The map between formal power series induced by a map on the coefficients.-/
def map : power_series R →+* power_series S :=
mv_power_series.map _ f
@[simp] lemma map_id : (map (ring_hom.id R) :
power_series R → power_series R) = id := rfl
lemma map_comp : map (g.comp f) = (map g).comp (map f) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coeff_map (n : ℕ) (φ : power_series R) :
coeff S n (map f φ) = f (coeff R n φ) := rfl
end map
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R]
lemma X_pow_dvd_iff {n : ℕ} {φ : power_series R} :
(X : power_series R)^n ∣ φ ↔ ∀ m, m < n → coeff R m φ = 0 :=
begin
convert @mv_power_series.X_pow_dvd_iff unit R _ () n φ, apply propext,
classical, split; intros h m hm,
{ rw finsupp.unique_single m, convert h _ hm },
{ apply h, simpa only [finsupp.single_eq_same] using hm }
end
lemma X_dvd_iff {φ : power_series R} :
(X : power_series R) ∣ φ ↔ constant_coeff R φ = 0 :=
begin
rw [← pow_one (X : power_series R), X_pow_dvd_iff, ← coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff_apply],
split; intro h,
{ exact h 0 zero_lt_one },
{ intros m hm, rwa nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hm) }
end
open finset nat
/-- The ring homomorphism taking a power series `f(X)` to `f(aX)`. -/
noncomputable def rescale (a : R) : power_series R →+* power_series R :=
{ to_fun := λ f, power_series.mk $ λ n, a^n * (power_series.coeff R n f),
map_zero' := by { ext, simp only [linear_map.map_zero, power_series.coeff_mk, mul_zero], },
map_one' := by { ext1, simp only [mul_boole, power_series.coeff_mk, power_series.coeff_one],
split_ifs, { rw [h, pow_zero], }, refl, },
map_add' := by { intros, ext, exact mul_add _ _ _, },
map_mul' := λ f g, by {
ext,
rw [power_series.coeff_mul, power_series.coeff_mk, power_series.coeff_mul, finset.mul_sum],
apply sum_congr rfl,
simp only [coeff_mk, prod.forall, nat.mem_antidiagonal],
intros b c H,
rw [←H, pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm] }, }
@[simp] lemma coeff_rescale (f : power_series R) (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R n (rescale a f) = a^n * coeff R n f := coeff_mk n _
@[simp] lemma rescale_zero : rescale 0 = (C R).comp (constant_coeff R) :=
begin
ext,
simp only [function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp, rescale, ring_hom.coe_mk,
power_series.coeff_mk _ _, coeff_C],
split_ifs,
{ simp only [h, one_mul, coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff, pow_zero], },
{ rw [zero_pow' n h, zero_mul], },
end
lemma rescale_zero_apply : rescale 0 X = C R (constant_coeff R X) :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma rescale_one : rescale 1 = ring_hom.id (power_series R) :=
by { ext, simp only [ring_hom.id_apply, rescale, one_pow, coeff_mk, one_mul,
ring_hom.coe_mk], }
section trunc
/-- The `n`th truncation of a formal power series to a polynomial -/
def trunc (n : ℕ) (φ : power_series R) : polynomial R :=
∑ m in Ico 0 (n + 1), polynomial.monomial m (coeff R m φ)
lemma coeff_trunc (m) (n) (φ : power_series R) :
(trunc n φ).coeff m = if m ≤ n then coeff R m φ else 0 :=
by simp [trunc, polynomial.coeff_sum, polynomial.coeff_monomial, nat.lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] lemma trunc_zero (n) : trunc n (0 : power_series R) = 0 :=
polynomial.ext $ λ m,
begin
rw [coeff_trunc, linear_map.map_zero, polynomial.coeff_zero],
split_ifs; refl
end
@[simp] lemma trunc_one (n) : trunc n (1 : power_series R) = 1 :=
polynomial.ext $ λ m,
begin
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_one],
split_ifs with H H' H'; rw [polynomial.coeff_one],
{ subst m, rw [if_pos rfl] },
{ symmetry, exact if_neg (ne.elim (ne.symm H')) },
{ symmetry, refine if_neg _,
intro H', apply H, subst m, exact nat.zero_le _ }
end
@[simp] lemma trunc_C (n) (a : R) : trunc n (C R a) = polynomial.C a :=
polynomial.ext $ λ m,
begin
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_C, polynomial.coeff_C],
split_ifs with H; refl <|> try {simp * at *}
end
@[simp] lemma trunc_add (n) (φ ψ : power_series R) :
trunc n (φ + ψ) = trunc n φ + trunc n ψ :=
polynomial.ext $ λ m,
begin
simp only [coeff_trunc, add_monoid_hom.map_add, polynomial.coeff_add],
split_ifs with H, {refl}, {rw [zero_add]}
end
end trunc
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [ring R]
/-- Auxiliary function used for computing inverse of a power series -/
protected def inv.aux : R → power_series R → power_series R :=
mv_power_series.inv.aux
lemma coeff_inv_aux (n : ℕ) (a : R) (φ : power_series R) :
coeff R n (inv.aux a φ) = if n = 0 then a else
- a * ∑ x in finset.nat.antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv.aux a φ) else 0 :=
begin
rw [coeff, inv.aux, mv_power_series.coeff_inv_aux],
simp only [finsupp.single_eq_zero],
split_ifs, {refl},
congr' 1,
symmetry,
apply finset.sum_bij (λ (p : ℕ × ℕ) h, (single () p.1, single () p.2)),
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij, rw finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal at hij,
rw [finsupp.mem_antidiagonal, ← finsupp.single_add, hij], },
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij,
by_cases H : j < n,
{ rw [if_pos H, if_pos], {refl},
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟩, simpa [finsupp.single_eq_same] using le_of_lt H },
{ intro hh, rw lt_iff_not_ge at H, apply H,
simpa [finsupp.single_eq_same] using hh () } },
{ rw [if_neg H, if_neg], rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, apply h₂, rintro ⟨⟩,
simpa [finsupp.single_eq_same] using not_lt.1 H } },
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ ⟨k,l⟩ hij hkl,
simpa only [prod.mk.inj_iff, finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff] using id },
{ rintros ⟨f,g⟩ hfg,
refine ⟨(f (), g ()), _, _⟩,
{ rw finsupp.mem_antidiagonal at hfg,
rw [finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal, ← finsupp.add_apply, hfg, finsupp.single_eq_same] },
{ rw prod.mk.inj_iff, dsimp,
exact ⟨finsupp.unique_single f, finsupp.unique_single g⟩ } }
end
/-- A formal power series is invertible if the constant coefficient is invertible.-/
def inv_of_unit (φ : power_series R) (u : units R) : power_series R :=
mv_power_series.inv_of_unit φ u
lemma coeff_inv_of_unit (n : ℕ) (φ : power_series R) (u : units R) :
coeff R n (inv_of_unit φ u) = if n = 0 then ↑u⁻¹ else
- ↑u⁻¹ * ∑ x in finset.nat.antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv_of_unit φ u) else 0 :=
coeff_inv_aux n ↑u⁻¹ φ
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_inv_of_unit (φ : power_series R) (u : units R) :
constant_coeff R (inv_of_unit φ u) = ↑u⁻¹ :=
by rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff_apply, coeff_inv_of_unit, if_pos rfl]
lemma mul_inv_of_unit (φ : power_series R) (u : units R) (h : constant_coeff R φ = u) :
φ * inv_of_unit φ u = 1 :=
mv_power_series.mul_inv_of_unit φ u $ h
/-- Two ways of removing the constant coefficient of a power series are the same. -/
lemma sub_const_eq_shift_mul_X (φ : power_series R) :
φ - C R (constant_coeff R φ) = power_series.mk (λ p, coeff R (p + 1) φ) * X :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr (eq_shift_mul_X_add_const φ)
lemma sub_const_eq_X_mul_shift (φ : power_series R) :
φ - C R (constant_coeff R φ) = X * power_series.mk (λ p, coeff R (p + 1) φ) :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr (eq_X_mul_shift_add_const φ)
end ring
section comm_ring
variables {A : Type*} [comm_ring A]
@[simp] lemma rescale_neg_one_X : rescale (-1 : A) X = -X :=
begin
ext, simp only [linear_map.map_neg, coeff_rescale, coeff_X],
split_ifs with h; simp [h]
end
/-- The ring homomorphism taking a power series `f(X)` to `f(-X)`. -/
noncomputable def eval_neg_hom : power_series A →+* power_series A :=
rescale (-1 : A)
@[simp] lemma eval_neg_hom_X : eval_neg_hom (X : power_series A) = -X :=
rescale_neg_one_X
end comm_ring
section integral_domain
variable [integral_domain R]
lemma eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (φ ψ : power_series R) (h : φ * ψ = 0) :
φ = 0 ∨ ψ = 0 :=
begin
rw or_iff_not_imp_left, intro H,
have ex : ∃ m, coeff R m φ ≠ 0, { contrapose! H, exact ext H },
let m := nat.find ex,
have hm₁ : coeff R m φ ≠ 0 := nat.find_spec ex,
have hm₂ : ∀ k < m, ¬coeff R k φ ≠ 0 := λ k, nat.find_min ex,
ext n, rw (coeff R n).map_zero, apply nat.strong_induction_on n,
clear n, intros n ih,
replace h := congr_arg (coeff R (m + n)) h,
rw [linear_map.map_zero, coeff_mul, finset.sum_eq_single (m,n)] at h,
{ replace h := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h,
rw or_iff_not_imp_left at h, exact h hm₁ },
{ rintro ⟨i,j⟩ hij hne,
by_cases hj : j < n, { rw [ih j hj, mul_zero] },
by_cases hi : i < m,
{ specialize hm₂ _ hi, push_neg at hm₂, rw [hm₂, zero_mul] },
rw finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal at hij,
push_neg at hi hj,
suffices : m < i,
{ have : m + n < i + j := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le this hj,
exfalso, exact ne_of_lt this hij.symm },
contrapose! hne, have : i = m := le_antisymm hne hi, subst i, clear hi hne,
simpa [ne.def, prod.mk.inj_iff] using (add_right_inj m).mp hij },
{ contrapose!, intro h, rw finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal }
end
instance : integral_domain (power_series R) :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero,
.. power_series.nontrivial,
.. power_series.comm_ring }
/-- The ideal spanned by the variable in the power series ring
over an integral domain is a prime ideal.-/
lemma span_X_is_prime : (ideal.span ({X} : set (power_series R))).is_prime :=
begin
suffices : ideal.span ({X} : set (power_series R)) = (constant_coeff R).ker,
{ rw this, exact ring_hom.ker_is_prime _ },
apply ideal.ext, intro φ,
rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ideal.mem_span_singleton, X_dvd_iff]
end
/-- The variable of the power series ring over an integral domain is prime.-/
lemma X_prime : prime (X : power_series R) :=
begin
rw ← ideal.span_singleton_prime,
{ exact span_X_is_prime },
{ intro h, simpa using congr_arg (coeff R 1) h }
end
lemma rescale_injective {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) : function.injective (rescale a) :=
begin
intros p q h,
rw power_series.ext_iff at *,
intros n,
specialize h n,
rw [coeff_rescale, coeff_rescale, mul_eq_mul_left_iff] at h,
apply h.resolve_right,
intro h',
exact ha (pow_eq_zero h'),
end
end integral_domain
section local_ring
variables {S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S]
(f : R →+* S) [is_local_ring_hom f]
instance map.is_local_ring_hom : is_local_ring_hom (map f) :=
mv_power_series.map.is_local_ring_hom f
variables [local_ring R] [local_ring S]
instance : local_ring (power_series R) :=
mv_power_series.local_ring
end local_ring
section algebra
variables {A : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
theorem C_eq_algebra_map {r : R} : C R r = (algebra_map R (power_series R)) r := rfl
theorem algebra_map_apply {r : R} :
algebra_map R (power_series A) r = C A (algebra_map R A r) :=
mv_power_series.algebra_map_apply
instance [nontrivial R] : nontrivial (subalgebra R (power_series R)) :=
mv_power_series.subalgebra.nontrivial
end algebra
section field
variables {k : Type*} [field k]
/-- The inverse 1/f of a power series f defined over a field -/
protected def inv : power_series k → power_series k :=
mv_power_series.inv
instance : has_inv (power_series k) := ⟨power_series.inv⟩
lemma inv_eq_inv_aux (φ : power_series k) :
φ⁻¹ = inv.aux (constant_coeff k φ)⁻¹ φ := rfl
lemma coeff_inv (n) (φ : power_series k) :
coeff k n (φ⁻¹) = if n = 0 then (constant_coeff k φ)⁻¹ else
- (constant_coeff k φ)⁻¹ * ∑ x in finset.nat.antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff k x.1 φ * coeff k x.2 (φ⁻¹) else 0 :=
by rw [inv_eq_inv_aux, coeff_inv_aux n (constant_coeff k φ)⁻¹ φ]
@[simp] lemma constant_coeff_inv (φ : power_series k) :
constant_coeff k (φ⁻¹) = (constant_coeff k φ)⁻¹ :=
mv_power_series.constant_coeff_inv φ
lemma inv_eq_zero {φ : power_series k} :
φ⁻¹ = 0 ↔ constant_coeff k φ = 0 :=
mv_power_series.inv_eq_zero
@[simp, priority 1100] lemma inv_of_unit_eq (φ : power_series k) (h : constant_coeff k φ ≠ 0) :
inv_of_unit φ (units.mk0 _ h) = φ⁻¹ :=
mv_power_series.inv_of_unit_eq _ _
@[simp] lemma inv_of_unit_eq' (φ : power_series k) (u : units k) (h : constant_coeff k φ = u) :
inv_of_unit φ u = φ⁻¹ :=
mv_power_series.inv_of_unit_eq' φ _ h
@[simp] protected lemma mul_inv (φ : power_series k) (h : constant_coeff k φ ≠ 0) :
φ * φ⁻¹ = 1 :=
mv_power_series.mul_inv φ h
@[simp] protected lemma inv_mul (φ : power_series k) (h : constant_coeff k φ ≠ 0) :
φ⁻¹ * φ = 1 :=
mv_power_series.inv_mul φ h
lemma eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq {φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : power_series k} (h : constant_coeff k φ₃ ≠ 0) :
φ₁ = φ₂ * φ₃⁻¹ ↔ φ₁ * φ₃ = φ₂ :=
mv_power_series.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq h
lemma eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one {φ ψ : power_series k} (h : constant_coeff k ψ ≠ 0) :
φ = ψ⁻¹ ↔ φ * ψ = 1 :=
mv_power_series.eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one h
lemma inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one {φ ψ : power_series k} (h : constant_coeff k ψ ≠ 0) :
ψ⁻¹ = φ ↔ φ * ψ = 1 :=
mv_power_series.inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one h
end field
end power_series
namespace power_series
variable {R : Type*}
local attribute [instance, priority 1] classical.prop_decidable
noncomputable theory
section order_basic
open multiplicity
variables [comm_semiring R]
/-- The order of a formal power series `φ` is the greatest `n : enat`
such that `X^n` divides `φ`. The order is `⊤` if and only if `φ = 0`. -/
@[reducible] def order (φ : power_series R) : enat :=
multiplicity X φ
lemma order_finite_of_coeff_ne_zero (φ : power_series R) (h : ∃ n, coeff R n φ ≠ 0) :
(order φ).dom :=
begin
cases h with n h, refine ⟨n, _⟩, dsimp only,
rw X_pow_dvd_iff, push_neg, exact ⟨n, lt_add_one n, h⟩
end
/-- If the order of a formal power series is finite,
then the coefficient indexed by the order is nonzero.-/
lemma coeff_order (φ : power_series R) (h : (order φ).dom) :
coeff R (φ.order.get h) φ ≠ 0 :=
begin
have H := nat.find_spec h, contrapose! H, rw X_pow_dvd_iff,
intros m hm, by_cases Hm : m < nat.find h,
{ have := nat.find_min h Hm, push_neg at this,
rw X_pow_dvd_iff at this, exact this m (lt_add_one m) },
have : m = nat.find h, {linarith}, {rwa this}
end
/-- If the `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is nonzero,
then the order of the power series is less than or equal to `n`.-/
lemma order_le (φ : power_series R) (n : ℕ) (h : coeff R n φ ≠ 0) :
order φ ≤ n :=
begin
have h : ¬ X^(n+1) ∣ φ,
{ rw X_pow_dvd_iff, push_neg, exact ⟨n, lt_add_one n, h⟩ },
have : (order φ).dom := ⟨n, h⟩,
rw [← enat.coe_get this, enat.coe_le_coe],
refine nat.find_min' this h
end
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is `0` if `n` is strictly
smaller than the order of the power series.-/
lemma coeff_of_lt_order (φ : power_series R) (n : ℕ) (h: ↑n < order φ) :
coeff R n φ = 0 :=
by { contrapose! h, exact order_le _ _ h }
/-- The order of the `0` power series is infinite.-/
@[simp] lemma order_zero : order (0 : power_series R) = ⊤ :=
multiplicity.zero _
/-- The `0` power series is the unique power series with infinite order.-/
@[simp] lemma order_eq_top {φ : power_series R} :
φ.order = ⊤ ↔ φ = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, ext n, rw [(coeff R n).map_zero, coeff_of_lt_order], simp [h] },
{ rintros rfl, exact order_zero }
end
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`.-/
lemma nat_le_order (φ : power_series R) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ i < n, coeff R i φ = 0) :
↑n ≤ order φ :=
begin
by_contra H, rw not_le at H,
have : (order φ).dom := enat.dom_of_le_some (le_of_lt H),
rw [← enat.coe_get this, enat.coe_lt_coe] at H,
exact coeff_order _ this (h _ H)
end
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`.-/
lemma le_order (φ : power_series R) (n : enat) (h : ∀ i : ℕ, ↑i < n → coeff R i φ = 0) :
n ≤ order φ :=
begin
induction n using enat.cases_on,
{ show _ ≤ _, rw [top_le_iff, order_eq_top],
ext i, exact h _ (enat.coe_lt_top i) },
{ apply nat_le_order, simpa only [enat.coe_lt_coe] using h }
end
/-- The order of a formal power series is exactly `n` if the `n`th coefficient is nonzero,
and the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`.-/
lemma order_eq_nat {φ : power_series R} {n : ℕ} :
order φ = n ↔ (coeff R n φ ≠ 0) ∧ (∀ i, i < n → coeff R i φ = 0) :=
begin
simp only [eq_some_iff, X_pow_dvd_iff], push_neg,
split,
{ rintros ⟨h₁, m, hm₁, hm₂⟩, refine ⟨_, h₁⟩,
suffices : n = m, { rwa this },
suffices : m ≥ n, { linarith },
contrapose! hm₂, exact h₁ _ hm₂ },
{ rintros ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, exact ⟨h₂, n, lt_add_one n, h₁⟩ }
end
/-- The order of a formal power series is exactly `n` if the `n`th coefficient is nonzero,
and the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`.-/
lemma order_eq {φ : power_series R} {n : enat} :
order φ = n ↔ (∀ i:ℕ, ↑i = n → coeff R i φ ≠ 0) ∧ (∀ i:ℕ, ↑i < n → coeff R i φ = 0) :=
begin
induction n using enat.cases_on,
{ rw order_eq_top, split,
{ rintro rfl, split; intros,
{ exfalso, exact enat.coe_ne_top ‹_› ‹_› },
{ exact (coeff _ _).map_zero } },
{ rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ext i, exact h₂ i (enat.coe_lt_top i) } },
{ simpa [enat.coe_inj] using order_eq_nat }
end
/-- The order of the sum of two formal power series
is at least the minimum of their orders.-/
lemma le_order_add (φ ψ : power_series R) :
min (order φ) (order ψ) ≤ order (φ + ψ) :=
multiplicity.min_le_multiplicity_add
private lemma order_add_of_order_eq.aux (φ ψ : power_series R)
(h : order φ ≠ order ψ) (H : order φ < order ψ) :
order (φ + ψ) ≤ order φ ⊓ order ψ :=
begin
suffices : order (φ + ψ) = order φ,
{ rw [le_inf_iff, this], exact ⟨le_refl _, le_of_lt H⟩ },
{ rw order_eq, split,
{ intros i hi, rw [(coeff _ _).map_add, coeff_of_lt_order ψ i (hi.symm ▸ H), add_zero],
exact (order_eq_nat.1 hi.symm).1 },
{ intros i hi,
rw [(coeff _ _).map_add, coeff_of_lt_order φ i hi,
coeff_of_lt_order ψ i (lt_trans hi H), zero_add] } }
end
/-- The order of the sum of two formal power series
is the minimum of their orders if their orders differ.-/
lemma order_add_of_order_eq (φ ψ : power_series R) (h : order φ ≠ order ψ) :
order (φ + ψ) = order φ ⊓ order ψ :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_order_add _ _),
by_cases H₁ : order φ < order ψ,
{ apply order_add_of_order_eq.aux _ _ h H₁ },
by_cases H₂ : order ψ < order φ,
{ simpa only [add_comm, inf_comm] using order_add_of_order_eq.aux _ _ h.symm H₂ },
exfalso, exact h (le_antisymm (not_lt.1 H₂) (not_lt.1 H₁))
end
/-- The order of the product of two formal power series
is at least the sum of their orders.-/
lemma order_mul_ge (φ ψ : power_series R) :
order φ + order ψ ≤ order (φ * ψ) :=
begin
apply le_order,
intros n hn, rw [coeff_mul, finset.sum_eq_zero],
rintros ⟨i,j⟩ hij,
by_cases hi : ↑i < order φ,
{ rw [coeff_of_lt_order φ i hi, zero_mul] },
by_cases hj : ↑j < order ψ,
{ rw [coeff_of_lt_order ψ j hj, mul_zero] },
rw not_lt at hi hj, rw finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal at hij,
exfalso,
apply ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hn $ add_le_add hi hj),
rw [← enat.coe_add, hij]
end
/-- The order of the monomial `a*X^n` is infinite if `a = 0` and `n` otherwise.-/
lemma order_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
order (monomial R n a) = if a = 0 then ⊤ else n :=
begin
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [h, order_eq_top, linear_map.map_zero] },
{ rw [order_eq], split; intros i hi,
{ rw [enat.coe_inj] at hi, rwa [hi, coeff_monomial_same] },
{ rw [enat.coe_lt_coe] at hi, rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg], exact ne_of_lt hi } }
end
/-- The order of the monomial `a*X^n` is `n` if `a ≠ 0`.-/
lemma order_monomial_of_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) :
order (monomial R n a) = n :=
by rw [order_monomial, if_neg h]
/-- If `n` is strictly smaller than the order of `ψ`, then the `n`th coefficient of its product
with any other power series is `0`. -/
lemma coeff_mul_of_lt_order {φ ψ : power_series R} {n : ℕ} (h : ↑n < ψ.order) :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = 0 :=
begin
suffices : coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p in finset.nat.antidiagonal n, 0,
rw [this, finset.sum_const_zero],
rw [coeff_mul],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl (λ x hx, _),
refine mul_eq_zero_of_right (coeff R x.fst φ) (ψ.coeff_of_lt_order x.snd (lt_of_le_of_lt _ h)),
rw finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal at hx,
norm_cast,
linarith,
end
lemma coeff_mul_one_sub_of_lt_order {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {φ ψ : power_series R}
(n : ℕ) (h : ↑n < ψ.order) :
coeff R n (φ * (1 - ψ)) = coeff R n φ :=
by simp [coeff_mul_of_lt_order h, mul_sub]
lemma coeff_mul_prod_one_sub_of_lt_order {R ι : Type*} [comm_ring R] (k : ℕ) (s : finset ι)
(φ : power_series R) (f : ι → power_series R) :
(∀ i ∈ s, ↑k < (f i).order) → coeff R k (φ * ∏ i in s, (1 - f i)) = coeff R k φ :=
begin
apply finset.induction_on s,
{ simp },
{ intros a s ha ih t,
simp only [finset.mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp] at t,
rw [finset.prod_insert ha, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm, coeff_mul_one_sub_of_lt_order _ t.1],
exact ih t.2 },
end
end order_basic
section order_zero_ne_one
variables [comm_semiring R] [nontrivial R]
/-- The order of the formal power series `1` is `0`.-/
@[simp] lemma order_one : order (1 : power_series R) = 0 :=
by simpa using order_monomial_of_ne_zero 0 (1:R) one_ne_zero
/-- The order of the formal power series `X` is `1`.-/
@[simp] lemma order_X : order (X : power_series R) = 1 :=
order_monomial_of_ne_zero 1 (1:R) one_ne_zero
/-- The order of the formal power series `X^n` is `n`.-/
@[simp] lemma order_X_pow (n : ℕ) : order ((X : power_series R)^n) = n :=
by { rw [X_pow_eq, order_monomial_of_ne_zero], exact one_ne_zero }
end order_zero_ne_one
section order_integral_domain
variables [integral_domain R]
/-- The order of the product of two formal power series over an integral domain
is the sum of their orders.-/
lemma order_mul (φ ψ : power_series R) :
order (φ * ψ) = order φ + order ψ :=
multiplicity.mul (X_prime)
end order_integral_domain
end power_series
namespace polynomial
open finsupp
variables {σ : Type*} {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
/-- The natural inclusion from polynomials into formal power series.-/
instance coe_to_power_series : has_coe (polynomial R) (power_series R) :=
⟨λ φ, power_series.mk $ λ n, coeff φ n⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coeff_coe (φ : polynomial R) (n) :
power_series.coeff R n φ = coeff φ n :=
congr_arg (coeff φ) (finsupp.single_eq_same)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(monomial n a : power_series R) = power_series.monomial R n a :=
by { ext, simp [coeff_coe, power_series.coeff_monomial, polynomial.coeff_monomial, eq_comm] }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : polynomial R) : power_series R) = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : polynomial R) : power_series R) = 1 :=
begin
have := coe_monomial 0 (1:R),
rwa power_series.monomial_zero_eq_C_apply at this,
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (φ ψ : polynomial R) :
((φ + ψ : polynomial R) : power_series R) = φ + ψ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul (φ ψ : polynomial R) :
((φ * ψ : polynomial R) : power_series R) = φ * ψ :=
power_series.ext $ λ n,
by simp only [coeff_coe, power_series.coeff_mul, coeff_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_C (a : R) :
((C a : polynomial R) : power_series R) = power_series.C R a :=
begin
have := coe_monomial 0 a,
rwa power_series.monomial_zero_eq_C_apply at this,
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_X :
((X : polynomial R) : power_series R) = power_series.X :=
coe_monomial _ _
/--
The coercion from polynomials to power series
as a ring homomorphism.
-/
-- TODO as an algebra homomorphism?
def coe_to_power_series.ring_hom : polynomial R →+* power_series R :=
{ to_fun := (coe : polynomial R → power_series R),
map_zero' := coe_zero,
map_one' := coe_one,
map_add' := coe_add,
map_mul' := coe_mul }
end polynomial
|
abea92d027842d63d5ec9c51bc9f9178b3d276b5 | 271e26e338b0c14544a889c31c30b39c989f2e0f | /src/Init/Coe.lean | 2da50508a96d749e7f6721fed218811332418ebb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dgorokho/lean4 | 805f99b0b60c545b64ac34ab8237a8504f89d7d4 | e949a052bad59b1c7b54a82d24d516a656487d8a | refs/heads/master | 1,607,061,363,851 | 1,578,006,086,000 | 1,578,006,086,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,852 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
/-
The Elaborator tries to insert coercions automatically.
Only instances of HasCoe type class are considered in the process.
Lean also provides a "lifting" operator: ↑a.
It uses all instances of HasLift type class.
Every HasCoe instance is also a HasLift instance.
We recommend users only use HasCoe for coercions that do not produce a lot
of ambiguity.
All coercions and lifts can be identified with the constant coe.
We use the HasCoeToFun type class for encoding coercions from
a Type to a Function space.
We use the HasCoeToSort type class for encoding coercions from
a Type to a sort.
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.List.Basic
universes u v
class HasLift (a : Sort u) (b : Sort v) :=
(lift : a → b)
/-- Auxiliary class that contains the transitive closure of HasLift. -/
class HasLiftT (a : Sort u) (b : Sort v) :=
(lift : a → b)
class HasCoe (a : Sort u) (b : Sort v) :=
(coe : a → b)
/-- Auxiliary class that contains the transitive closure of HasCoe. -/
class HasCoeT (a : Sort u) (b : Sort v) :=
(coe : a → b)
class HasCoeToFun (a : Sort u) : Sort (max u (v+1)) :=
(F : a → Sort v) (coe : ∀ x, F x)
class HasCoeToSort (a : Sort u) : Type (max u (v+1)) :=
(S : Sort v) (coe : a → S)
@[inline] def lift {a : Sort u} {b : Sort v} [HasLift a b] : a → b :=
@HasLift.lift a b _
@[inline] def liftT {a : Sort u} {b : Sort v} [HasLiftT a b] : a → b :=
@HasLiftT.lift a b _
@[inline] def coeB {a : Sort u} {b : Sort v} [HasCoe a b] : a → b :=
@HasCoe.coe a b _
@[inline] def coeT {a : Sort u} {b : Sort v} [HasCoeT a b] : a → b :=
@HasCoeT.coe a b _
@[inline] def coeFnB {a : Sort u} [HasCoeToFun.{u, v} a] : ∀ (x : a), HasCoeToFun.F.{u, v} x :=
HasCoeToFun.coe
/- User Level coercion operators -/
@[reducible, inline] def coe {a : Sort u} {b : Sort v} [HasLiftT a b] : a → b :=
liftT
@[reducible, inline] def coeFn {a : Sort u} [HasCoeToFun.{u, v} a] : ∀ (x : a), HasCoeToFun.F.{u, v} x :=
HasCoeToFun.coe
@[reducible, inline] def coeSort {a : Sort u} [HasCoeToSort.{u, v} a] : a → HasCoeToSort.S.{u, v} a :=
HasCoeToSort.coe
/- Notation -/
universes u₁ u₂ u₃
/- Transitive closure for HasLift, HasCoe, HasCoeToFun -/
instance liftTrans {a : Sort u₁} {b : Sort u₂} {c : Sort u₃} [HasLiftT b c] [HasLift a b] : HasLiftT a c :=
⟨fun x => liftT (lift x : b)⟩
instance liftRefl {a : Sort u} : HasLiftT a a :=
⟨id⟩
instance coeTrans {a : Sort u₁} {b : Sort u₂} {c : Sort u₃} [HasCoeT b c] [HasCoe a b] : HasCoeT a c :=
⟨fun x => coeT (coeB x : b)⟩
instance coeBase {a : Sort u} {b : Sort v} [HasCoe a b] : HasCoeT a b :=
⟨coeB⟩
/- We add this instance directly into HasCoeT to avoid non-termination.
Suppose coeOption had Type (HasCoe a (Option a)).
Then, we can loop when searching a coercion from α to β (HasCoeT α β)
1- coeTrans at (HasCoeT α β)
(HasCoe α ?b₁) and (HasCoeT ?b₁ c)
2- coeOption at (HasCoe α ?b₁)
?b₁ := Option α
3- coeTrans at (HasCoeT (Option α) β)
(HasCoe (Option α) ?b₂) and (HasCoeT ?b₂ β)
4- coeOption at (HasCoe (Option α) ?b₂)
?b₂ := Option (Option α))
...
-/
instance coeOption {a : Type u} : HasCoeT a (Option a) :=
⟨fun x => some x⟩
/- Auxiliary transitive closure for HasCoe which does not contain
instances such as coeOption.
They would produce non-termination when combined with coeFnTrans and coeSortTrans.
-/
class HasCoeTAux (a : Sort u) (b : Sort v) :=
(coe : a → b)
instance coeTransAux {a : Sort u₁} {b : Sort u₂} {c : Sort u₃} [HasCoeTAux b c] [HasCoe a b] : HasCoeTAux a c :=
⟨fun x => @HasCoeTAux.coe b c _ (coeB x)⟩
instance coeBaseAux {a : Sort u} {b : Sort v} [HasCoe a b] : HasCoeTAux a b :=
⟨coeB⟩
instance coeFnTrans {a : Sort u₁} {b : Sort u₂} [HasCoeToFun.{u₂, u₃} b] [HasCoeTAux a b] : HasCoeToFun.{u₁, u₃} a :=
{ F := fun x => @HasCoeToFun.F.{u₂, u₃} b _ (@HasCoeTAux.coe a b _ x),
coe := fun x => coeFn (@HasCoeTAux.coe a b _ x) }
instance coeSortTrans {a : Sort u₁} {b : Sort u₂} [HasCoeToSort.{u₂, u₃} b] [HasCoeTAux a b] : HasCoeToSort.{u₁, u₃} a :=
{ S := HasCoeToSort.S.{u₂, u₃} b,
coe := fun x => coeSort (@HasCoeTAux.coe a b _ x) }
/- Every coercion is also a lift -/
instance coeToLift {a : Sort u} {b : Sort v} [HasCoeT a b] : HasLiftT a b :=
⟨coeT⟩
/- basic coercions -/
instance coeBoolToProp : HasCoe Bool Prop :=
⟨fun y => y = true⟩
/- Tactics such as the simplifier only unfold reducible constants when checking whether two terms are definitionally
equal or a Term is a proposition. The motivation is performance.
In particular, when simplifying `p -> q`, the tactic `simp` only visits `p` if it can establish that it is a proposition.
Thus, we mark the following instance as @[reducible], otherwise `simp` will not visit `↑p` when simplifying `↑p -> q`.
-/
@[reducible] instance coeSortBool : HasCoeToSort Bool :=
⟨Prop, fun y => y = true⟩
instance coeDecidableEq (x : Bool) : Decidable (coe x) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x = true))
instance coeSubtype {a : Sort u} {p : a → Prop} : HasCoe {x // p x} a :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
/- basic lifts -/
universes ua ua₁ ua₂ ub ub₁ ub₂
/- Remark: we can't use [HasLiftT a₂ a₁] since it will produce non-termination whenever a type class resolution
problem does not have a solution. -/
instance liftFn {a₁ : Sort ua₁} {a₂ : Sort ua₂} {b₁ : Sort ub₁} {b₂ : Sort ub₂} [HasLiftT b₁ b₂] [HasLift a₂ a₁] : HasLift (a₁ → b₁) (a₂ → b₂) :=
⟨fun f x => coe (f (coe x))⟩
instance liftFnRange {a : Sort ua} {b₁ : Sort ub₁} {b₂ : Sort ub₂} [HasLiftT b₁ b₂] : HasLift (a → b₁) (a → b₂) :=
⟨fun f x => coe (f x)⟩
instance liftFnDom {a₁ : Sort ua₁} {a₂ : Sort ua₂} {b : Sort ub} [HasLift a₂ a₁] : HasLift (a₁ → b) (a₂ → b) :=
⟨fun f x => f (coe x)⟩
instance liftPair {a₁ : Type ua₁} {a₂ : Type ub₂} {b₁ : Type ub₁} {b₂ : Type ub₂} [HasLiftT a₁ a₂] [HasLiftT b₁ b₂] : HasLift (a₁ × b₁) (a₂ × b₂) :=
⟨fun p => Prod.casesOn p (fun x y => (coe x, coe y))⟩
instance liftPair₁ {a₁ : Type ua₁} {a₂ : Type ua₂} {b : Type ub} [HasLiftT a₁ a₂] : HasLift (a₁ × b) (a₂ × b) :=
⟨fun p => Prod.casesOn p (fun x y => (coe x, y))⟩
instance liftPair₂ {a : Type ua} {b₁ : Type ub₁} {b₂ : Type ub₂} [HasLiftT b₁ b₂] : HasLift (a × b₁) (a × b₂) :=
⟨fun p => Prod.casesOn p (fun x y => (x, coe y))⟩
instance liftList {a : Type u} {b : Type v} [HasLiftT a b] : HasLift (List a) (List b) :=
⟨fun l => List.map (@coe a b _) l⟩
|
2e88615f5731d8daf7d4e5920995a063ed565abd | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /src/measure_theory/interval_integral.lean | bec986c4829771ebc0ca11fd1c1e16f6185f3b54 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 65,048 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import measure_theory.set_integral
import measure_theory.lebesgue_measure
import analysis.calculus.deriv
/-!
# Integral over an interval
In this file we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ` if `a ≤ b`
and `-∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ` if `b ≤ a`. We prove a few simple properties and many versions
of the first part of the
[fundamental theorem of calculus](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_calculus).
Recall that it states that the function `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` has derivative
`(δu, δv) ↦ δv • f b - δu • f a` at `(a, b)` provided that `f` is continuous at `a` and `b`.
## Main statements
### FTC-1 for Lebesgue measure
We prove several versions of FTC-1, all in the `interval_integral` namespace. Many of them follow
the naming scheme `integral_has(_strict?)_(f?)deriv(_within?)_at(_of_tendsto_ae?)(_right|_left?)`.
They formulate FTC in terms of `has(_strict?)_(f?)deriv(_within?)_at`.
Let us explain the meaning of each part of the name:
* `_strict` means that the theorem is about strict differentiability;
* `f` means that the theorem is about differentiability in both endpoints; incompatible with
`_right|_left`;
* `_within` means that the theorem is about one-sided derivatives, see below for details;
* `_of_tendsto_ae` means that instead of continuity the theorem assumes that `f` has a finite limit
almost surely as `x` tends to `a` and/or `b`;
* `_right` or `_left` mean that the theorem is about differentiability in the right (resp., left)
endpoint.
We also reformulate these theorems in terms of `(f?)deriv(_within?)`. These theorems are named
`(f?)deriv(_within?)_integral(_of_tendsto_ae?)(_right|_left?)` with the same meaning of parts of the
name.
### One-sided derivatives
Theorem `integral_has_fderiv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae` states that `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` has a
derivative `(δu, δv) ↦ δv • cb - δu • ca` within the set `s × t` at `(a, b)` provided that `f` tends
to `ca` (resp., `cb`) almost surely at `la` (resp., `lb`), where possible values of `s`, `t`, and
corresponding filters `la`, `lb` are given in the following table.
| `s` | `la` | `t` | `lb` |
| ------- | ---- | --- | ---- |
| `Iic a` | `𝓝[Iic a] a` | `Iic b` | `𝓝[Iic b] b` |
| `Ici a` | `𝓝[Ioi a] a` | `Ici b` | `𝓝[Ioi b] b` |
| `{a}` | `⊥` | `{b}` | `⊥` |
| `univ` | `𝓝 a` | `univ` | `𝓝 b` |
We use a typeclass `FTC_filter` to make Lean automatically find `la`/`lb` based on `s`/`t`. This way
we can formulate one theorem instead of `16` (or `8` if we leave only non-trivial ones not covered
by `integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_(left|right)` and
`integral_has_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_ae`). Similarly,
`integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_right` works for both one-sided derivatives using the
same typeclass to find an appropriate filter.
### FTC for a locally finite measure
Before proving FTC for the Lebesgue measure, we prove a few statements that can be seen as FTC for
any measure. The most general of them,
`measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae`, states the following. Let `(la, la')`
be an `FTC_filter` pair of filters around `a` (i.e., `FTC_filter a la la'`) and let `(lb, lb')` be
an `FTC_filter` pair of filters around `b`. If `f` has finite limits `ca` and `cb` almost surely at
`la'` and `lb'`, respectively, then
`∫ x in va..vb, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in ua..ub, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in ub..vb, cb ∂μ - ∫ x in ua..va, ca ∂μ +
o(∥∫ x in ua..va, (1:ℝ) ∂μ∥ + ∥∫ x in ub..vb, (1:ℝ) ∂μ∥)` as `ua` and `va` tend to `la` while
`ub` and `vb` tend to `lb`.
## Implementation notes
### Avoiding `if`, `min`, and `max`
In order to avoid `if`s in the definition, we define `interval_integrable f μ a b` as
`integrable_on f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ integrable_on f (Ioc b a) μ`. For any `a`, `b` one of these
intervals is empty and the other coincides with `Ioc (min a b) (max a b)`.
Similarly, we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` to be `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`.
Again, for any `a`, `b` one of these integrals is zero, and the other gives the expected result.
This way some properties can be translated from integrals over sets without dealing with
the cases `a ≤ b` and `b ≤ a` separately.
### Choice of the interval
We use integral over `Ioc (min a b) (max a b)` instead of one of the other three possible
intervals with the same endpoints for two reasons:
* this way `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ` holds whenever
`f` is integrable on each interval; in particular, it works even if the measure `μ` has an atom
at `b`; this rules out `Ioo` and `Icc` intervals;
* with this definition for a probability measure `μ`, the integral `∫ x in a..b, 1 ∂μ` equals
the difference $F_μ(b)-F_μ(a)$, where $F_μ(a)=μ(-∞, a]$ is the
[cumulative distribution function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulative_distribution_function)
of `μ`.
### `FTC_filter` class
As explained above, many theorems in this file rely on the typeclass
`FTC_filter (a : α) (l l' : filter α)` to avoid code duplication. This typeclass combines four
assumptions:
- `pure a ≤ l`;
- `l' ≤ 𝓝 a`;
- `l'` has a basis of measurable sets;
- if `u n` and `v n` tend to `l`, then for any `s ∈ l'`, `Ioc (u n) (v n)` is eventually included
in `s`.
This typeclass has exactly four “real” instances: `(a, pure a, ⊥)`, `(a, 𝓝[Ici a] a, 𝓝[Ioi a] a)`,
`(a, 𝓝[Iic a] a, 𝓝[Iic a] a)`, `(a, 𝓝 a, 𝓝 a)`, and two instances that are equal to the first and
last “real” instances: `(a, 𝓝[{a}] a, ⊥)` and `(a, 𝓝[univ] a, 𝓝[univ] a)`. While the difference
between `Ici a` and `Ioi a` doesn't matter for theorems about Lebesgue measure, it becomes important
in the versions of FTC about any locally finite measure if this measure has an atom at one of the
endpoints.
## Tags
integral, fundamental theorem of calculus
-/
noncomputable theory
open topological_space (second_countable_topology)
open measure_theory set classical filter
open_locale classical topological_space filter
variables {α β 𝕜 E F : Type*} [decidable_linear_order α] [measurable_space α]
[measurable_space E] [normed_group E]
/-!
### Integrability at an interval
-/
/-- A function `f` is called *interval integrable* with respect to a measure `μ` on an unordered
interval `a..b` if it is integrable on both intervals `(a, b]` and `(b, a]`. One of these
intervals is always empty, so this property is equivalent to `f` being integrable on
`(min a b, max a b]`. -/
def interval_integrable (f : α → E) (μ : measure α) (a b : α) :=
integrable_on f (Ioc a b) μ ∧ integrable_on f (Ioc b a) μ
lemma measure_theory.integrable.interval_integrable {f : α → E} {μ : measure α}
(hf : integrable f μ) {a b : α} :
interval_integrable f μ a b :=
⟨hf.integrable_on, hf.integrable_on⟩
namespace interval_integrable
section
variables {f : α → E} {a b c : α} {μ : measure α}
@[symm] lemma symm (h : interval_integrable f μ a b) : interval_integrable f μ b a :=
h.symm
@[refl] lemma refl (hf : measurable f) : interval_integrable f μ a a :=
by split; simp [hf]
@[trans] lemma trans (hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hbc : interval_integrable f μ b c) :
interval_integrable f μ a c :=
⟨(hab.1.union hbc.1).mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioc_union_Ioc,
(hbc.2.union hab.2).mono_set Ioc_subset_Ioc_union_Ioc⟩
lemma neg [borel_space E] (h : interval_integrable f μ a b) : interval_integrable (-f) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.neg, h.2.neg⟩
protected lemma measurable (h : interval_integrable f μ a b) : measurable f :=
h.1.measurable
end
variables [borel_space E] {f g : α → E} {a b : α} {μ : measure α}
lemma smul [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] {f : α → E} {a b : α} {μ : measure α}
(h : interval_integrable f μ a b) (r : 𝕜) :
interval_integrable (r • f) μ a b :=
⟨h.1.smul r, h.2.smul r⟩
lemma add [second_countable_topology E] (hf : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hg : interval_integrable g μ a b) : interval_integrable (f + g) μ a b :=
⟨hf.1.add hg.1, hf.2.add hg.2⟩
lemma sub [second_countable_topology E] (hf : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hg : interval_integrable g μ a b) : interval_integrable (f - g) μ a b :=
⟨hf.1.sub hg.1, hf.2.sub hg.2⟩
end interval_integrable
/-- Let `l'` be a measurably generated filter; let `l` be a of filter such that each `s ∈ l'`
eventually includes `Ioc u v` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`. Let `μ` be a measure finite at `l'`.
Suppose that `f : α → E` has a finite limit at `l' ⊓ μ.ae`. Then `f` is interval integrable on
`u..v` provided that both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
Typeclass instances allow Lean to find `l'` based on `l` but not vice versa, so
`apply tendsto.eventually_interval_integrable_ae` will generate goals `filter α` and
`tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc ?m_1 l'`. -/
lemma filter.tendsto.eventually_interval_integrable_ae {f : α → E} (hfm : measurable f)
{μ : measure α} {l l' : filter α} [tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc l l'] [is_measurably_generated l']
(hμ : μ.finite_at_filter l') {c : E} (hf : tendsto f (l' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c))
{u v : β → α} {lt : filter β} (hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) :
∀ᶠ t in lt, interval_integrable f μ (u t) (v t) :=
have _ := (hf.integrable_at_filter_ae hfm hμ).eventually,
((hu.Ioc hv).eventually this).and $ (hv.Ioc hu).eventually this
/-- Let `l'` be a measurably generated filter; let `l` be a of filter such that each `s ∈ l'`
eventually includes `Ioc u v` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`. Let `μ` be a measure finite at `l'`.
Suppose that `f : α → E` has a finite limit at `l`. Then `f` is interval integrable on `u..v`
provided that both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
Typeclass instances allow Lean to find `l'` based on `l` but not vice versa, so
`apply tendsto.eventually_interval_integrable_ae` will generate goals `filter α` and
`tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc ?m_1 l'`. -/
lemma filter.tendsto.eventually_interval_integrable {f : α → E} (hfm : measurable f)
{μ : measure α} {l l' : filter α} [tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc l l'] [is_measurably_generated l']
(hμ : μ.finite_at_filter l') {c : E} (hf : tendsto f l' (𝓝 c))
{u v : β → α} {lt : filter β} (hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) :
∀ᶠ t in lt, interval_integrable f μ (u t) (v t) :=
(hf.mono_left inf_le_left).eventually_interval_integrable_ae hfm hμ hu hv
/-!
### Interval integral: definition and basic properties
In this section we define `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` as `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`
and prove some basic properties.
-/
variables [second_countable_topology E] [complete_space E] [normed_space ℝ E]
[borel_space E]
/-- The interval integral `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ` is defined
as `∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`. If `a ≤ b`, then it equals
`∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ`, otherwise it equals `-∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ`. -/
def interval_integral (f : α → E) (a b : α) (μ : measure α) :=
∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ
notation `∫` binders ` in ` a `..` b `, ` r:(scoped:60 f, f) ` ∂` μ:70 := interval_integral r a b μ
notation `∫` binders ` in ` a `..` b `, ` r:(scoped:60 f, interval_integral f a b volume) := r
namespace interval_integral
section
variables {a b c d : α} {f g : α → E} {μ : measure α}
@[simp] lemma integral_zero : ∫ x in a..b, (0 : E) ∂μ = 0 :=
by simp [interval_integral]
lemma integral_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in Ioc a b, f x ∂μ :=
by simp [interval_integral, h]
@[simp] lemma integral_same : ∫ x in a..a, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
sub_self _
lemma integral_symm (a b) : ∫ x in b..a, f x ∂μ = -∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ :=
by simp only [interval_integral, neg_sub]
lemma integral_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) : ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = -∫ x in Ioc b a, f x ∂μ :=
by simp only [integral_symm b, integral_of_le h]
lemma integral_cases (f : α → E) (a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ ∈ ({∫ x in Ioc (min a b) (max a b), f x ∂μ,
-∫ x in Ioc (min a b) (max a b), f x ∂μ} : set E) :=
(le_total a b).imp (λ h, by simp [h, integral_of_le]) (λ h, by simp [h, integral_of_ge])
lemma integral_non_measurable {f : α → E} {a b} (hf : ¬measurable f) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
by rw [interval_integral, integral_non_measurable hf, integral_non_measurable hf, sub_zero]
lemma norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc :
∥∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ∥ = ∥∫ x in Ioc (min a b) (max a b), f x ∂μ∥ :=
(integral_cases f a b).elim (congr_arg _) (λ h, (congr_arg _ h).trans (norm_neg _))
lemma norm_integral_le_integral_norm_Ioc :
∥∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ ∫ x in Ioc (min a b) (max a b), ∥f x∥ ∂μ :=
calc ∥∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ∥ = ∥∫ x in Ioc (min a b) (max a b), f x ∂μ∥ :
norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc
... ≤ ∫ x in Ioc (min a b) (max a b), ∥f x∥ ∂μ :
norm_integral_le_integral_norm f
lemma norm_integral_le_abs_integral_norm : ∥∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ abs (∫ x in a..b, ∥f x∥ ∂μ) :=
begin
simp only [← real.norm_eq_abs, norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc],
exact le_trans (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _) (le_abs_self _)
end
lemma norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae {a b C : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
(h : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ Ioc (min a b) (max a b) → ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
∥∫ x in a..b, f x∥ ≤ C * abs (b - a) :=
begin
rw [norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_Ioc],
convert norm_set_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae'' _ is_measurable_Ioc h,
{ rw [real.volume_Ioc, max_sub_min_eq_abs, ennreal.to_real_of_real (abs_nonneg _)] },
{ simp only [real.volume_Ioc, ennreal.of_real_lt_top] },
end
lemma norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const {a b C : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
(h : ∀ x ∈ Ioc (min a b) (max a b), ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
∥∫ x in a..b, f x∥ ≤ C * abs (b - a) :=
norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const_ae $ eventually_of_forall h
lemma integral_add (hf : interval_integrable f μ a b) (hg : interval_integrable g μ a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ :=
by { simp only [interval_integral, integral_add hf.1 hg.1, integral_add hf.2 hg.2], abel }
@[simp] lemma integral_neg : ∫ x in a..b, -f x ∂μ = -∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ :=
by { simp only [interval_integral, integral_neg], abel }
lemma integral_sub (hf : interval_integrable f μ a b) (hg : interval_integrable g μ a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in a..b, g x ∂μ :=
(integral_add hf hg.neg).trans $ congr_arg _ integral_neg
lemma integral_smul (r : ℝ) : ∫ x in a..b, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ :=
by simp only [interval_integral, integral_smul, smul_sub]
lemma integral_const' (c : E) :
∫ x in a..b, c ∂μ = ((μ $ Ioc a b).to_real - (μ $ Ioc b a).to_real) • c :=
by simp only [interval_integral, set_integral_const, sub_smul]
lemma integral_const {a b : ℝ} (c : E) : (∫ (x : ℝ) in a..b, c) = (b - a) • c :=
by simp only [integral_const', real.volume_Ioc, ennreal.to_real_of_real', ← neg_sub b,
max_zero_sub_eq_self]
lemma integral_smul_measure (c : ennreal) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂(c • μ) = c.to_real • ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ :=
by simp only [interval_integral, measure.restrict_smul, integral_smul_measure, smul_sub]
lemma integral_comp_add_right (a b c : ℝ) (f : ℝ → E) (hfm : measurable f) :
∫ x in a..b, f (x + c) = ∫ x in a+c..b+c, f x :=
calc ∫ x in a..b, f (x + c) = ∫ x in a+c..b+c, f x ∂(measure.map (λ x, x + c) volume) :
by simp only [interval_integral, set_integral_map is_measurable_Ioc hfm (measurable_add_right _),
preimage_add_const_Ioc, add_sub_cancel]
... = ∫ x in a+c..b+c, f x : by rw [real.map_volume_add_right]
lemma integral_comp_mul_right {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (a b : ℝ) (f : ℝ → E) (hfm : measurable f) :
∫ x in a..b, f (x * c) = c⁻¹ • ∫ x in a*c..b*c, f x :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw [← real.smul_map_volume_mul_right (ne_of_gt hc)] },
rw [integral_smul_measure],
simp only [interval_integral, set_integral_map is_measurable_Ioc hfm (measurable_mul_right _),
hc, preimage_mul_const_Ioc, mul_div_cancel _ (ne_of_gt hc), abs_of_pos,
ennreal.to_real_of_real (le_of_lt hc), inv_smul_smul' (ne_of_gt hc)]
end
lemma integral_comp_neg (a b : ℝ) (f : ℝ → E) (hfm : measurable f) :
∫ x in a..b, f (-x) = ∫ x in -b..-a, f x :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw ← real.map_volume_neg },
simp only [interval_integral, set_integral_map is_measurable_Ioc hfm measurable_neg, neg_preimage,
preimage_neg_Ioc, neg_neg, restrict_congr_set Ico_ae_eq_Ioc]
end
/-!
### Integral is an additive function of the interval
In this section we prove that `∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ`
as well as a few other identities trivially equivalent to this one. We also prove that
`∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ` provided that `support f ⊆ Ioc a b`.
-/
variables [topological_space α] [opens_measurable_space α]
section order_closed_topology
variables [order_closed_topology α]
lemma integral_add_adjacent_intervals_cancel (hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hbc : interval_integrable f μ b c) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in c..a, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
begin
have hac := hab.trans hbc,
simp only [interval_integral, ← add_sub_comm, sub_eq_zero],
iterate 4 { rw ← integral_union },
{ suffices : Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b c ∪ Ioc c a = Ioc b a ∪ Ioc c b ∪ Ioc a c, by rw this,
rw [Ioc_union_Ioc_union_Ioc_cycle, union_right_comm, Ioc_union_Ioc_union_Ioc_cycle,
min_left_comm, max_left_comm] },
all_goals { simp [*, is_measurable.union, is_measurable_Ioc, Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same,
Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same.symm, hab.1, hab.2, hbc.1, hbc.2, hac.1, hac.2] }
end
lemma integral_add_adjacent_intervals (hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hbc : interval_integrable f μ b c) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in b..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ :=
by rw [← add_neg_eq_zero, ← integral_symm, integral_add_adjacent_intervals_cancel hab hbc]
lemma integral_interval_sub_left (hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hac : interval_integrable f μ a c) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in c..b, f x ∂μ :=
sub_eq_of_eq_add' $ eq.symm $ integral_add_adjacent_intervals hac (hac.symm.trans hab)
lemma integral_interval_add_interval_comm (hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hcd : interval_integrable f μ c d) (hac : interval_integrable f μ a c) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in c..d, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..d, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in c..b, f x ∂μ :=
by rw [← integral_add_adjacent_intervals hac hcd, add_assoc, add_left_comm,
integral_add_adjacent_intervals hac (hac.symm.trans hab), add_comm]
lemma integral_interval_sub_interval_comm (hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hcd : interval_integrable f μ c d) (hac : interval_integrable f μ a c) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in c..d, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..c, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in b..d, f x ∂μ :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, ← integral_symm,
integral_interval_add_interval_comm hab hcd.symm (hac.trans hcd)]
lemma integral_interval_sub_interval_comm' (hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hcd : interval_integrable f μ c d) (hac : interval_integrable f μ a c) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in c..d, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in d..b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in c..a, f x ∂μ :=
by { rw [integral_interval_sub_interval_comm hab hcd hac, integral_symm b d, integral_symm a c,
sub_neg_eq_add, sub_eq_neg_add], }
lemma integral_Iic_sub_Iic (ha : integrable_on f (Iic a) μ) (hb : integrable_on f (Iic b) μ) :
∫ x in Iic b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in Iic a, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ :=
begin
wlog hab : a ≤ b using [a b] tactic.skip,
{ rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add', integral_of_le hab, ← integral_union (Iic_disjoint_Ioc (le_refl _)),
Iic_union_Ioc_eq_Iic hab],
exacts [is_measurable_Iic, is_measurable_Ioc, ha, hb.mono_set (λ _, and.right)] },
{ intros ha hb,
rw [integral_symm, ← this hb ha, neg_sub] }
end
/-- If `μ` is a finite measure then `∫ x in a..b, c ∂μ = (μ (Iic b) - μ (Iic a)) • c`. -/
lemma integral_const_of_cdf [finite_measure μ] (c : E) :
∫ x in a..b, c ∂μ = ((μ (Iic b)).to_real - (μ (Iic a)).to_real) • c :=
begin
simp only [sub_smul, ← set_integral_const],
refine (integral_Iic_sub_Iic _ _).symm;
simp only [integrable_on_const, measure_lt_top, or_true]
end
lemma integral_eq_integral_of_support_subset {f : α → E} {a b} (h : function.support f ⊆ Ioc a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
by_cases hfm : measurable f,
{ cases le_total a b with hab hab,
{ rw [integral_of_le hab, ← integral_indicator hfm is_measurable_Ioc,
indicator_of_support_subset h] },
{ rw [Ioc_eq_empty hab, subset_empty_iff, function.support_eq_empty_iff] at h,
simp [h] } },
{ rw [integral_non_measurable hfm, measure_theory.integral_non_measurable hfm] },
end
end order_closed_topology
end
lemma integral_eq_zero_iff_of_le_of_nonneg_ae {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b)
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc a b)] f) (hfi : interval_integrable f volume a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc a b)] 0 :=
by rw [integral_of_le hab, integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1]
lemma integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b a)] f) (hfi : interval_integrable f volume a b) :
∫ x in a..b, f x = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b a)] 0 :=
begin
cases le_total a b with hab hab;
simp only [Ioc_eq_empty hab, empty_union, union_empty] at *,
{ exact integral_eq_zero_iff_of_le_of_nonneg_ae hab hf hfi },
{ rw [integral_symm, neg_eq_zero],
exact integral_eq_zero_iff_of_le_of_nonneg_ae hab hf hfi.symm }
end
lemma integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae' {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[volume.restrict (Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b a)] f) (hfi : interval_integrable f volume a b) :
0 < ∫ x in a..b, f x ↔ a < b ∧ 0 < volume (function.support f ∩ Ioc a b) :=
begin
cases le_total a b with hab hab,
{ simp only [integral_of_le hab, Ioc_eq_empty hab, union_empty] at hf ⊢,
symmetry,
rw [set_integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1, and_iff_right_iff_imp],
contrapose!,
intro h,
simp [Ioc_eq_empty h] },
{ rw [Ioc_eq_empty hab, empty_union] at hf,
simp [integral_of_ge hab, Ioc_eq_empty hab, integral_nonneg_of_ae hf] }
end
lemma integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[volume] f) (hfi : interval_integrable f volume a b) :
0 < ∫ x in a..b, f x ↔ a < b ∧ 0 < volume (function.support f ∩ Ioc a b) :=
integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae' (ae_mono measure.restrict_le_self hf) hfi
/-!
### Fundamental theorem of calculus, part 1, for any measure
In this section we prove a few lemmas that can be seen as versions of FTC-1 for interval integral
w.r.t. any measure. Many theorems are formulated for one or two pairs of filters related by
`FTC_filter a l l'`. This typeclass has exactly four “real” instances: `(a, pure a, ⊥)`,
`(a, 𝓝[Ici a] a, 𝓝[Ioi a] a)`, `(a, 𝓝[Iic a] a, 𝓝[Iic a] a)`, `(a, 𝓝 a, 𝓝 a)`, and two instances
that are equal to the first and last “real” instances: `(a, 𝓝[{a}] a, ⊥)` and
`(a, 𝓝[univ] a, 𝓝[univ] a)`. We use this approach to avoid repeating arguments in many very similar
cases. Lean can automatically find both `a` and `l'` based on `l`.
The most general theorem `measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae` can be seen
as a generalization of lemma `integral_has_strict_fderiv_at` below which states strict
differentiability of `∫ x in u..v, f x` in `(u, v)` at `(a, b)` for a measurable function `f` that
is integrable on `a..b` and is continuous at `a` and `b`. The lemma is generalized in three
directions: first, `measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae` deals with any
locally finite measure `μ`; second, it works for one-sided limits/derivatives; third, it assumes
only that `f` has finite limits almost surely at `a` and `b`.
Namely, let `f` be a measurable function integrable on `a..b`. Let `(la, la')` be a pair of
`FTC_filter`s around `a`; let `(lb, lb')` be a pair of `FTC_filter`s around `b`. Suppose that `f`
has finite limits `ca` and `cb` at `la' ⊓ μ.ae` and `lb' ⊓ μ.ae`, respectively. Then
`∫ x in va..vb, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in ua..ub, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in ub..vb, cb ∂μ - ∫ x in ua..va, ca ∂μ +
o(∥∫ x in ua..va, (1:ℝ) ∂μ∥ + ∥∫ x in ub..vb, (1:ℝ) ∂μ∥)`
as `ua` and `va` tend to `la` while `ub` and `vb` tend to `lb`.
This theorem is formulated with integral of constants instead of measures in the right hand sides
for two reasons: first, this way we avoid `min`/`max` in the statements; second, often it is
possible to write better `simp` lemmas for these integrals, see `integral_const` and
`integral_const_of_cdf`.
In the next subsection we apply this theorem to prove various theorems about differentiability
of the integral w.r.t. Lebesgue measure. -/
/-- An auxiliary typeclass for the Fundamental theorem of calculus, part 1. It is used to formulate
theorems that work simultaneously for left and right one-sided derivatives of `∫ x in u..v, f x`.
There are four instances: `(a, pure a, ⊥)`, `(a, 𝓝[Ici a], 𝓝[Ioi a])`,
`(a, 𝓝[Iic a], 𝓝[Iic a])`, and `(a, 𝓝 a, 𝓝 a)`. -/
class FTC_filter {β : Type*} [linear_order β] [measurable_space β] [topological_space β]
(a : out_param β) (outer : filter β) (inner : out_param $ filter β)
extends tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc outer inner : Prop :=
(pure_le : pure a ≤ outer)
(le_nhds : inner ≤ 𝓝 a)
[meas_gen : is_measurably_generated inner]
/- The `dangerous_instance` linter doesn't take `out_param`s into account, so it thinks that
`FTC_filter.to_tendsto_Ixx_class` is dangerous. Disable this linter using `nolint`.
-/
attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] FTC_filter.to_tendsto_Ixx_class
namespace FTC_filter
variables [linear_order β] [measurable_space β] [topological_space β]
instance pure (a : β) : FTC_filter a (pure a) ⊥ :=
{ pure_le := le_refl _,
le_nhds := bot_le }
instance nhds_within_singleton (a : β) : FTC_filter a (𝓝[{a}] a) ⊥ :=
by { rw [nhds_within, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)], apply_instance }
lemma finite_at_inner {a : β} (l : filter β) {l'} [h : FTC_filter a l l']
{μ : measure β} [locally_finite_measure μ] :
μ.finite_at_filter l' :=
(μ.finite_at_nhds a).filter_mono h.le_nhds
variables [opens_measurable_space β] [order_topology β]
instance nhds (a : β) : FTC_filter a (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
{ pure_le := pure_le_nhds a,
le_nhds := le_refl _ }
instance nhds_univ (a : β) : FTC_filter a (𝓝[univ] a) (𝓝 a) :=
by { rw nhds_within_univ, apply_instance }
instance nhds_left (a : β) : FTC_filter a (𝓝[Iic a] a) (𝓝[Iic a] a) :=
{ pure_le := pure_le_nhds_within right_mem_Iic,
le_nhds := inf_le_left }
instance nhds_right (a : β) : FTC_filter a (𝓝[Ici a] a) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) :=
{ pure_le := pure_le_nhds_within left_mem_Ici,
le_nhds := inf_le_left }
end FTC_filter
open asymptotics
section
variables {f : α → E} {a b : α} {c ca cb : E} {l l' la la' lb lb' : filter α} {lt : filter β}
{μ : measure α} {u v ua va ub vb : β → α}
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, local version for any measure.
Let filters `l` and `l'` be related by `tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc`.
If `f` has a finite limit `c` at `l' ⊓ μ.ae`, where `μ` is a measure
finite at `l'`, then `∫ x in u..v, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in u..v, c ∂μ + o(∫ x in u..v, 1 ∂μ)` as both
`u` and `v` tend to `l`.
See also `measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae` for a version assuming
`[FTC_filter a l l']` and `[locally_finite_measure μ]`. If `l` is one of `𝓝[Ici a] a`,
`𝓝[Iic a] a`, `𝓝 a`, then it's easier to apply the non-primed version.
The primed version also works, e.g., for `l = l' = at_top`.
We use integrals of constants instead of measures because this way it is easier to formulate
a statement that works in both cases `u ≤ v` and `v ≤ u`. -/
lemma measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae'
[is_measurably_generated l'] [tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc l l']
(hfm : measurable f) (hf : tendsto f (l' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c)) (hl : μ.finite_at_filter l')
(hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) :
is_o (λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in u t..v t, c ∂μ)
(λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, (1:ℝ) ∂μ) lt :=
begin
have A := (hf.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae hfm hl).comp_tendsto (hu.Ioc hv),
have B := (hf.integral_sub_linear_is_o_ae hfm hl).comp_tendsto (hv.Ioc hu),
simp only [integral_const'],
convert (A.trans_le _).sub (B.trans_le _),
{ ext t,
simp_rw [(∘), interval_integral, sub_smul],
abel },
all_goals { intro t, cases le_total (u t) (v t) with huv huv; simp [huv] }
end
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, local version for any measure.
Let filters `l` and `l'` be related by `tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc`.
If `f` has a finite limit `c` at `l ⊓ μ.ae`, where `μ` is a measure
finite at `l`, then `∫ x in u..v, f x ∂μ = μ (Ioc u v) • c + o(μ(Ioc u v))` as both
`u` and `v` tend to `l` so that `u ≤ v`.
See also `measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_le` for a version assuming
`[FTC_filter a l l']` and `[locally_finite_measure μ]`. If `l` is one of `𝓝[Ici a] a`,
`𝓝[Iic a] a`, `𝓝 a`, then it's easier to apply the non-primed version.
The primed version also works, e.g., for `l = l' = at_top`. -/
lemma measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_le'
[is_measurably_generated l'] [tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc l l']
(hfm : measurable f) (hf : tendsto f (l' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c)) (hl : μ.finite_at_filter l')
(hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) (huv : u ≤ᶠ[lt] v) :
is_o (λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, f x ∂μ - (μ (Ioc (u t) (v t))).to_real • c)
(λ t, (μ $ Ioc (u t) (v t)).to_real) lt :=
(measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae' hfm hf hl hu hv).congr'
(huv.mono $ λ x hx, by simp [integral_const', hx])
(huv.mono $ λ x hx, by simp [integral_const', hx])
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, local version for any measure.
Let filters `l` and `l'` be related by `tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc`.
If `f` has a finite limit `c` at `l ⊓ μ.ae`, where `μ` is a measure
finite at `l`, then `∫ x in u..v, f x ∂μ = -μ (Ioc v u) • c + o(μ(Ioc v u))` as both
`u` and `v` tend to `l` so that `v ≤ u`.
See also `measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_ge` for a version assuming
`[FTC_filter a l l']` and `[locally_finite_measure μ]`. If `l` is one of `𝓝[Ici a] a`,
`𝓝[Iic a] a`, `𝓝 a`, then it's easier to apply the non-primed version.
The primed version also works, e.g., for `l = l' = at_top`. -/
lemma measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_ge'
[is_measurably_generated l'] [tendsto_Ixx_class Ioc l l']
(hfm : measurable f) (hf : tendsto f (l' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c)) (hl : μ.finite_at_filter l')
(hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) (huv : v ≤ᶠ[lt] u) :
is_o (λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, f x ∂μ + (μ (Ioc (v t) (u t))).to_real • c)
(λ t, (μ $ Ioc (v t) (u t)).to_real) lt :=
(measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_le' hfm hf hl hv hu huv).neg_left.congr_left $
λ t, by simp [integral_symm (u t), add_comm]
variables [topological_space α]
section
variables [locally_finite_measure μ] [FTC_filter a l l']
include a
local attribute [instance] FTC_filter.meas_gen
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, local version for any measure.
Let filters `l` and `l'` be related by `[FTC_filter a l l']`; let `μ` be a locally finite measure.
If `f` has a finite limit `c` at `l' ⊓ μ.ae`, then
`∫ x in u..v, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in u..v, c ∂μ + o(∫ x in u..v, 1 ∂μ)` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
See also `measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae'` for a version that also works, e.g., for
`l = l' = at_top`.
We use integrals of constants instead of measures because this way it is easier to formulate
a statement that works in both cases `u ≤ v` and `v ≤ u`. -/
lemma measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae (hfm : measurable f)
(hf : tendsto f (l' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c)) (hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) :
is_o (λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in u t..v t, c ∂μ)
(λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, (1:ℝ) ∂μ) lt :=
measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae' hfm hf (FTC_filter.finite_at_inner l) hu hv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, local version for any measure.
Let filters `l` and `l'` be related by `[FTC_filter a l l']`; let `μ` be a locally finite measure.
If `f` has a finite limit `c` at `l' ⊓ μ.ae`, then
`∫ x in u..v, f x ∂μ = μ (Ioc u v) • c + o(μ(Ioc u v))` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
See also `measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_le'` for a version that also works,
e.g., for `l = l' = at_top`. -/
lemma measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_le
(hfm : measurable f) (hf : tendsto f (l' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c))
(hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) (huv : u ≤ᶠ[lt] v) :
is_o (λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, f x ∂μ - (μ (Ioc (u t) (v t))).to_real • c)
(λ t, (μ $ Ioc (u t) (v t)).to_real) lt :=
measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_le' hfm hf (FTC_filter.finite_at_inner l) hu hv huv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, local version for any measure.
Let filters `l` and `l'` be related by `[FTC_filter a l l']`; let `μ` be a locally finite measure.
If `f` has a finite limit `c` at `l' ⊓ μ.ae`, then
`∫ x in u..v, f x ∂μ = -μ (Ioc v u) • c + o(μ(Ioc v u))` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`.
See also `measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_ge'` for a version that also works,
e.g., for `l = l' = at_top`. -/
lemma measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_ge
(hfm : measurable f) (hf : tendsto f (l' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c))
(hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) (huv : v ≤ᶠ[lt] u) :
is_o (λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, f x ∂μ + (μ (Ioc (v t) (u t))).to_real • c)
(λ t, (μ $ Ioc (v t) (u t)).to_real) lt :=
measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_of_ge' hfm hf (FTC_filter.finite_at_inner l) hu hv huv
end
variables [order_topology α] [borel_space α]
local attribute [instance] FTC_filter.meas_gen
variables [FTC_filter a la la'] [FTC_filter b lb lb'] [locally_finite_measure μ]
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, strict derivative in both limits for a locally finite
measure.
Let `f` be a measurable function integrable on `a..b`. Let `(la, la')` be a pair of `FTC_filter`s
around `a`; let `(lb, lb')` be a pair of `FTC_filter`s around `b`. Suppose that `f` has finite
limits `ca` and `cb` at `la' ⊓ μ.ae` and `lb' ⊓ μ.ae`, respectively.
Then `∫ x in va..vb, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in ua..ub, f x ∂μ =
∫ x in ub..vb, cb ∂μ - ∫ x in ua..va, ca ∂μ +
o(∥∫ x in ua..va, (1:ℝ) ∂μ∥ + ∥∫ x in ub..vb, (1:ℝ) ∂μ∥)`
as `ua` and `va` tend to `la` while `ub` and `vb` tend to `lb`.
-/
lemma measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae
(hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(ha_lim : tendsto f (la' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 ca)) (hb_lim : tendsto f (lb' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 cb))
(hua : tendsto ua lt la) (hva : tendsto va lt la)
(hub : tendsto ub lt lb) (hvb : tendsto vb lt lb) :
is_o (λ t, (∫ x in va t..vb t, f x ∂μ) - (∫ x in ua t..ub t, f x ∂μ) -
(∫ x in ub t..vb t, cb ∂μ - ∫ x in ua t..va t, ca ∂μ))
(λ t, ∥∫ x in ua t..va t, (1:ℝ) ∂μ∥ + ∥∫ x in ub t..vb t, (1:ℝ) ∂μ∥) lt :=
begin
refine
((measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae hab.measurable ha_lim hua hva).neg_left.add_add
(measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae hab.measurable hb_lim hub hvb)).congr'
_ (eventually_eq.refl _ _),
have A : ∀ᶠ t in lt, interval_integrable f μ (ua t) (va t) :=
ha_lim.eventually_interval_integrable_ae hab.measurable (FTC_filter.finite_at_inner la) hua hva,
have A' : ∀ᶠ t in lt, interval_integrable f μ a (ua t) :=
ha_lim.eventually_interval_integrable_ae hab.measurable (FTC_filter.finite_at_inner la)
(tendsto_const_pure.mono_right FTC_filter.pure_le) hua,
have B : ∀ᶠ t in lt, interval_integrable f μ (ub t) (vb t) :=
hb_lim.eventually_interval_integrable_ae hab.measurable (FTC_filter.finite_at_inner lb) hub hvb,
have B' : ∀ᶠ t in lt, interval_integrable f μ b (ub t) :=
hb_lim.eventually_interval_integrable_ae hab.measurable (FTC_filter.finite_at_inner lb)
(tendsto_const_pure.mono_right FTC_filter.pure_le) hub,
filter_upwards [A, A', B, B'], simp only [mem_set_of_eq],
intros t ua_va a_ua ub_vb b_ub,
rw [← integral_interval_sub_interval_comm'],
{ dsimp only [], abel },
exacts [ub_vb, ua_va, b_ub.symm.trans $ hab.symm.trans a_ua]
end
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, strict derivative in right endpoint for a locally finite
measure.
Let `f` be a measurable function integrable on `a..b`. Let `(lb, lb')` be a pair of `FTC_filter`s
around `b`. Suppose that `f` has a finite limit `c` at `lb' ⊓ μ.ae`.
Then `∫ x in a..v, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in a..u, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in u..v, c ∂μ + o(∫ x in u..v, (1:ℝ) ∂μ)`
as `u` and `v` tend to `lb`.
-/
lemma measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_right
(hab : interval_integrable f μ a b) (hf : tendsto f (lb' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c))
(hu : tendsto u lt lb) (hv : tendsto v lt lb) :
is_o (λ t, ∫ x in a..v t, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in a..u t, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in u t..v t, c ∂μ)
(λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, (1:ℝ) ∂μ) lt :=
by simpa using measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae
hab ((tendsto_bot : tendsto _ ⊥ (𝓝 0)).mono_left inf_le_left)
hf (tendsto_const_pure : tendsto _ _ (pure a)) tendsto_const_pure hu hv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, strict derivative in left endpoint for a locally finite
measure.
Let `f` be a measurable function integrable on `a..b`. Let `(la, la')` be a pair of `FTC_filter`s
around `a`. Suppose that `f` has a finite limit `c` at `la' ⊓ μ.ae`.
Then `∫ x in v..b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in u..b, f x ∂μ = -∫ x in u..v, c ∂μ + o(∫ x in u..v, (1:ℝ) ∂μ)`
as `u` and `v` tend to `la`.
-/
lemma measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_left
(hab : interval_integrable f μ a b)
(hf : tendsto f (la' ⊓ μ.ae) (𝓝 c)) (hu : tendsto u lt la) (hv : tendsto v lt la) :
is_o (λ t, ∫ x in v t..b, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in u t..b, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in u t..v t, c ∂μ)
(λ t, ∫ x in u t..v t, (1:ℝ) ∂μ) lt :=
by simpa using measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae
hab hf ((tendsto_bot : tendsto _ ⊥ (𝓝 0)).mono_left inf_le_left)
hu hv (tendsto_const_pure : tendsto _ _ (pure b)) tendsto_const_pure
end
/-!
### Fundamental theorem of calculus-1 for Lebesgue measure
In this section we restate theorems from the previous section for Lebesgue measure.
In particular, we prove that `∫ x in u..v, f x` is strictly differentiable in `(u, v)`
at `(a, b)` provided that `f` is integrable on `a..b` and is continuous at `a` and `b`.
-/
variables {f : ℝ → E} {c ca cb : E} {l l' la la' lb lb' : filter ℝ} {lt : filter β}
{a b z : ℝ} {u v ua ub va vb : β → ℝ} [FTC_filter a la la'] [FTC_filter b lb lb']
/-!
#### Auxiliary `is_o` statements
In this section we prove several lemmas that can be interpreted as strict differentiability of
`(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x ∂μ` in `u` and/or `v` at a filter. The statements use `is_o` because
we have no definition of `has_strict_(f)deriv_at_filter` in the library.
-/
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, local version. If `f` has a finite limit `c` almost surely at
`l'`, where `(l, l')` is an `FTC_filter` pair around `a`, then
`∫ x in u..v, f x ∂μ = (v - u) • c + o (v - u)` as both `u` and `v` tend to `l`. -/
lemma integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae [FTC_filter a l l']
(hfm : measurable f) (hf : tendsto f (l' ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c))
{u v : β → ℝ} (hu : tendsto u lt l) (hv : tendsto v lt l) :
is_o (λ t, (∫ x in u t..v t, f x) - (v t - u t) • c) (v - u) lt :=
by simpa [integral_const] using measure_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae hfm hf hu hv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, strict differentiability at filter in both endpoints.
If `f` is a measurable function integrable on `a..b`, `(la, la')` is an `FTC_filter` pair around
`a`, and `(lb, lb')` is an `FTC_filter` pair around `b`, and `f` has finite limits `ca` and `cb`
almost surely at `la'` and `lb'`, respectively, then
`(∫ x in va..vb, f x) - ∫ x in ua..ub, f x = (vb - ub) • cb - (va - ua) • ca +
o(∥va - ua∥ + ∥vb - ub∥)` as `ua` and `va` tend to `la` while `ub` and `vb` tend to `lb`.
This lemma could've been formulated using `has_strict_fderiv_at_filter` if we had this
definition. -/
lemma integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae
(hab : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha_lim : tendsto f (la' ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 ca)) (hb_lim : tendsto f (lb' ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 cb))
(hua : tendsto ua lt la) (hva : tendsto va lt la)
(hub : tendsto ub lt lb) (hvb : tendsto vb lt lb) :
is_o (λ t, (∫ x in va t..vb t, f x) - (∫ x in ua t..ub t, f x) -
((vb t - ub t) • cb - (va t - ua t) • ca)) (λ t, ∥va t - ua t∥ + ∥vb t - ub t∥) lt :=
by simpa [integral_const] using
measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae hab ha_lim hb_lim hua hva hub hvb
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, strict differentiability at filter in both endpoints.
If `f` is a measurable function integrable on `a..b`, `(lb, lb')` is an `FTC_filter` pair
around `b`, and `f` has a finite limit `c` almost surely at `lb'`, then
`(∫ x in a..v, f x) - ∫ x in a..u, f x = (v - u) • c + o(∥v - u∥)` as `u` and `v` tend to `lb`.
This lemma could've been formulated using `has_strict_deriv_at_filter` if we had this definition. -/
lemma integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_right
(hab : interval_integrable f volume a b) (hf : tendsto f (lb' ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c))
(hu : tendsto u lt lb) (hv : tendsto v lt lb) :
is_o (λ t, (∫ x in a..v t, f x) - (∫ x in a..u t, f x) - (v t - u t) • c) (v - u) lt :=
by simpa only [integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one] using
measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_right hab hf hu hv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1, strict differentiability at filter in both endpoints.
If `f` is a measurable function integrable on `a..b`, `(la, la')` is an `FTC_filter` pair
around `a`, and `f` has a finite limit `c` almost surely at `la'`, then
`(∫ x in v..b, f x) - ∫ x in u..b, f x = -(v - u) • c + o(∥v - u∥)` as `u` and `v` tend to `la`.
This lemma could've been formulated using `has_strict_deriv_at_filter` if we had this definition. -/
lemma integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_left
(hab : interval_integrable f volume a b) (hf : tendsto f (la' ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c))
(hu : tendsto u lt la) (hv : tendsto v lt la) :
is_o (λ t, (∫ x in v t..b, f x) - (∫ x in u t..b, f x) + (v t - u t) • c) (v - u) lt :=
by simpa only [integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one] using
measure_integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_left hab hf hu hv
open continuous_linear_map (fst snd smul_right sub_apply smul_right_apply coe_fst' coe_snd' map_sub)
/-!
#### Strict differentiability
In this section we prove that for a measurable function `f` integrable on `a..b`,
* `integral_has_strict_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_ae`: the function `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` has
derivative `(u, v) ↦ v • cb - u • ca` at `(a, b)` in the sense of strict differentiability
provided that `f` tends to `ca` and `cb` almost surely as `x` tendsto to `a` and `b`,
respectively;
* `integral_has_strict_fderiv_at`: the function `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` has
derivative `(u, v) ↦ v • f b - u • f a` at `(a, b)` in the sense of strict differentiability
provided that `f` is continuous at `a` and `b`;
* `integral_has_strict_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_right`: the function `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` has
derivative `c` at `b` in the sense of strict differentiability provided that `f` tends to `c`
almost surely as `x` tends to `b`;
* `integral_has_strict_deriv_at_right`: the function `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` has derivative `f b` at
`b` in the sense of strict differentiability provided that `f` is continuous at `b`;
* `integral_has_strict_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_left`: the function `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` has
derivative `-c` at `a` in the sense of strict differentiability provided that `f` tends to `c`
almost surely as `x` tends to `a`;
* `integral_has_strict_deriv_at_left`: the function `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` has derivative `-f a` at
`a` in the sense of strict differentiability provided that `f` is continuous at `a`.
-/
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has finite
limits `ca` and `cb` almost surely as `x` tends to `a` and `b`, respectively, then
`(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` has derivative `(u, v) ↦ v • cb - u • ca` at `(a, b)`
in the sense of strict differentiability. -/
lemma integral_has_strict_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_ae (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 ca)) (hb : tendsto f (𝓝 b ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 cb)) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x)
((snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right cb - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right ca) (a, b) :=
begin
have := integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae hf ha hb
((continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd).tendsto ((a, b), (a, b)))
((continuous_fst.comp continuous_fst).tendsto ((a, b), (a, b)))
((continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd).tendsto ((a, b), (a, b)))
((continuous_snd.comp continuous_fst).tendsto ((a, b), (a, b))),
refine (this.congr_left _).trans_is_O _,
{ intro x, simp [sub_smul] },
{ exact is_O_fst_prod.norm_left.add is_O_snd_prod.norm_left }
end
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `a` and `b`, then `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` has derivative `(u, v) ↦ v • cb - u • ca`
at `(a, b)` in the sense of strict differentiability. -/
lemma integral_has_strict_fderiv_at (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : continuous_at f a) (hb : continuous_at f b) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x)
((snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right (f b) - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right (f a)) (a, b) :=
integral_has_strict_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_ae hf
(ha.mono_left inf_le_left) (hb.mono_left inf_le_left)
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely at `b`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` has derivative `c` at `b` in the sense
of strict differentiability. -/
lemma integral_has_strict_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(hb : tendsto f (𝓝 b ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c)) : has_strict_deriv_at (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) c b :=
integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_right hf hb continuous_at_snd
continuous_at_fst
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `b`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` has derivative `f b` at `b` in the sense of strict
differentiability. -/
lemma integral_has_strict_deriv_at_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(hb : continuous_at f b) : has_strict_deriv_at (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) (f b) b :=
integral_has_strict_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_right hf (hb.mono_left inf_le_left)
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely at `a`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` has derivative `-c` at `a` in the sense
of strict differentiability. -/
lemma integral_has_strict_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c)) : has_strict_deriv_at (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) (-c) a :=
by simpa only [← integral_symm]
using (integral_has_strict_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_right hf.symm ha).neg
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `a`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` has derivative `-f a` at `a` in the sense of strict
differentiability. -/
lemma integral_has_strict_deriv_at_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : continuous_at f a) : has_strict_deriv_at (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) (-f a) a :=
by simpa only [← integral_symm] using (integral_has_strict_deriv_at_right hf.symm ha).neg
/-!
#### Fréchet differentiability
In this subsection we restate results from the previous subsection in terms of `has_fderiv_at`,
`has_deriv_at`, `fderiv`, and `deriv`.
-/
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has finite
limits `ca` and `cb` almost surely as `x` tends to `a` and `b`, respectively, then
`(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` has derivative `(u, v) ↦ v • cb - u • ca` at `(a, b)`. -/
lemma integral_has_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_ae (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 ca)) (hb : tendsto f (𝓝 b ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 cb)) :
has_fderiv_at (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x)
((snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right cb - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right ca) (a, b) :=
(integral_has_strict_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_ae hf ha hb).has_fderiv_at
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `a` and `b`, then `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` has derivative `(u, v) ↦ v • cb - u • ca`
at `(a, b)`. -/
lemma integral_has_fderiv_at (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : continuous_at f a) (hb : continuous_at f b) :
has_fderiv_at (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x)
((snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right (f b) - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right (f a)) (a, b) :=
(integral_has_strict_fderiv_at hf ha hb).has_fderiv_at
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has finite
limits `ca` and `cb` almost surely as `x` tends to `a` and `b`, respectively, then `fderiv`
derivative of `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` at `(a, b)` equals `(u, v) ↦ v • cb - u • ca`. -/
lemma fderiv_integral_of_tendsto_ae (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 ca)) (hb : tendsto f (𝓝 b ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 cb)) :
fderiv ℝ (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x) (a, b) =
(snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right cb - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right ca :=
(integral_has_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_ae hf ha hb).fderiv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `a` and `b`, then `fderiv` derivative of `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x` at `(a, b)` equals `(u, v) ↦
v • cb - u • ca`. -/
lemma fderiv_integral (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : continuous_at f a) (hb : continuous_at f b) :
fderiv ℝ (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x) (a, b) =
(snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right (f b) - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right (f a) :=
(integral_has_fderiv_at hf ha hb).fderiv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely at `b`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` has derivative `c` at `b`. -/
lemma integral_has_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(hb : tendsto f (𝓝 b ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c)) : has_deriv_at (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) c b :=
(integral_has_strict_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_right hf hb).has_deriv_at
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `b`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` has derivative `f b` at `b`. -/
lemma integral_has_deriv_at_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(hb : continuous_at f b) : has_deriv_at (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) (f b) b :=
(integral_has_strict_deriv_at_right hf hb).has_deriv_at
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely at `b`, then the derivative of `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` at `b` equals `c`. -/
lemma deriv_integral_of_tendsto_ae_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(hb : tendsto f (𝓝 b ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c)) : deriv (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) b = c :=
(integral_has_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_right hf hb).deriv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `b`, then the derivative of `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` at `b` equals `f b`. -/
lemma deriv_integral_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b) (hb : continuous_at f b) :
deriv (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) b = f b :=
(integral_has_deriv_at_right hf hb).deriv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely at `a`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` has derivative `-c` at `a`. -/
lemma integral_has_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(ha : tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c)) : has_deriv_at (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) (-c) a :=
(integral_has_strict_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_left hf ha).has_deriv_at
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus-1: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `a`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` has derivative `-f a` at `a`. -/
lemma integral_has_deriv_at_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b) (ha : continuous_at f a) :
has_deriv_at (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) (-f a) a :=
(integral_has_strict_deriv_at_left hf ha).has_deriv_at
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely at `a`, then the derivative of `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` at `a` equals `-c`. -/
lemma deriv_integral_of_tendsto_ae_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
(hb : tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c)) : deriv (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) a = -c :=
(integral_has_deriv_at_of_tendsto_ae_left hf hb).deriv
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f` is continuous
at `a`, then the derivative of `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` at `a` equals `-f a`. -/
lemma deriv_integral_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b) (hb : continuous_at f a) :
deriv (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) a = -f a :=
(integral_has_deriv_at_left hf hb).deriv
/-!
#### One-sided derivatives
-/
/-- Let `f` be a measurable function integrable on `a..b`. The function `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x`
has derivative `(u, v) ↦ v • cb - u • ca` within `s × t` at `(a, b)`, where
`s ∈ {Iic a, {a}, Ici a, univ}` and `t ∈ {Iic b, {b}, Ici b, univ}` provided that `f` tends to `ca`
and `cb` almost surely at the filters `la` and `lb` from the following table.
| `s` | `la` | `t` | `lb` |
| ------- | ---- | --- | ---- |
| `Iic a` | `𝓝[Iic a] a` | `Iic b` | `𝓝[Iic b] b` |
| `Ici a` | `𝓝[Ioi a] a` | `Ici b` | `𝓝[Ioi b] b` |
| `{a}` | `⊥` | `{b}` | `⊥` |
| `univ` | `𝓝 a` | `univ` | `𝓝 b` |
-/
lemma integral_has_fderiv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter a (𝓝[s] a) la] [FTC_filter b (𝓝[t] b) lb]
(ha : tendsto f (la ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 ca)) (hb : tendsto f (lb ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 cb)) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x)
((snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right cb - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right ca) (s.prod t) (a, b) :=
begin
rw [has_fderiv_within_at, nhds_within_prod_eq],
have := integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae hf ha hb
(tendsto_const_pure.mono_right FTC_filter.pure_le : tendsto _ _ (𝓝[s] a)) tendsto_fst
(tendsto_const_pure.mono_right FTC_filter.pure_le : tendsto _ _ (𝓝[t] b)) tendsto_snd,
refine (this.congr_left _).trans_is_O _,
{ intro x, simp [sub_smul] },
{ exact is_O_fst_prod.norm_left.add is_O_snd_prod.norm_left }
end
/-- Let `f` be a measurable function integrable on `a..b`. The function `(u, v) ↦ ∫ x in u..v, f x`
has derivative `(u, v) ↦ v • f b - u • f a` within `s × t` at `(a, b)`, where
`s ∈ {Iic a, {a}, Ici a, univ}` and `t ∈ {Iic b, {b}, Ici b, univ}` provided that `f` tends to
`f a` and `f b` at the filters `la` and `lb` from the following table. In most cases this assumption
is definitionally equal `continuous_at f _` or `continuous_within_at f _ _`.
| `s` | `la` | `t` | `lb` |
| ------- | ---- | --- | ---- |
| `Iic a` | `𝓝[Iic a] a` | `Iic b` | `𝓝[Iic b] b` |
| `Ici a` | `𝓝[Ioi a] a` | `Ici b` | `𝓝[Ioi b] b` |
| `{a}` | `⊥` | `{b}` | `⊥` |
| `univ` | `𝓝 a` | `univ` | `𝓝 b` |
-/
lemma integral_has_fderiv_within_at (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter a (𝓝[s] a) la] [FTC_filter b (𝓝[t] b) lb]
(ha : tendsto f la (𝓝 $ f a)) (hb : tendsto f lb (𝓝 $ f b)) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x)
((snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right (f b) - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right (f a)) (s.prod t) (a, b) :=
integral_has_fderiv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae hf (ha.mono_left inf_le_left)
(hb.mono_left inf_le_left)
/-- An auxiliary tactic closing goals `unique_diff_within_at ℝ s a` where
`s ∈ {Iic a, Ici a, univ}`. -/
meta def unique_diff_within_at_Ici_Iic_univ : tactic unit :=
`[apply_rules [unique_diff_on.unique_diff_within_at, unique_diff_on_Ici, unique_diff_on_Iic,
left_mem_Ici, right_mem_Iic, unique_diff_within_at_univ]]
/-- Let `f` be a measurable function integrable on `a..b`. Choose `s ∈ {Iic a, Ici a, univ}`
and `t ∈ {Iic b, Ici b, univ}`. Suppose that `f` tends to `ca` and `cb` almost surely at the filters
`la` and `lb` from the table below. Then `fderiv_within ℝ (λ p, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x) (s.prod t)`
is equal to `(u, v) ↦ u • cb - v • ca`.
| `s` | `la` | `t` | `lb` |
| ------- | ---- | --- | ---- |
| `Iic a` | `𝓝[Iic a] a` | `Iic b` | `𝓝[Iic b] b` |
| `Ici a` | `𝓝[Ioi a] a` | `Ici b` | `𝓝[Ioi b] b` |
| `univ` | `𝓝 a` | `univ` | `𝓝 b` |
-/
lemma fderiv_within_integral_of_tendsto_ae (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter a (𝓝[s] a) la] [FTC_filter b (𝓝[t] b) lb]
(ha : tendsto f (la ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 ca)) (hb : tendsto f (lb ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 cb))
(hs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s a . unique_diff_within_at_Ici_Iic_univ)
(ht : unique_diff_within_at ℝ t b . unique_diff_within_at_Ici_Iic_univ) :
fderiv_within ℝ (λ p : ℝ × ℝ, ∫ x in p.1..p.2, f x) (s.prod t) (a, b) =
((snd ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right cb - (fst ℝ ℝ ℝ).smul_right ca) :=
(integral_has_fderiv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae hf ha hb).fderiv_within $ hs.prod ht
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely as `x` tends to `b` from the right or from the left,
then `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` has right (resp., left) derivative `c` at `b`. -/
lemma integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter b (𝓝[s] b) (𝓝[t] b)] (hb : tendsto f (𝓝[t] b ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c)) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) c s b :=
integral_sub_integral_sub_linear_is_o_of_tendsto_ae_right hf hb
(tendsto_const_pure.mono_right FTC_filter.pure_le) tendsto_id
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` is continuous
from the left or from the right at `b`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` has left (resp., right)
derivative `f b` at `b`. -/
lemma integral_has_deriv_within_at_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter b (𝓝[s] b) (𝓝[t] b)] (hb : continuous_within_at f t b) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) (f b) s b :=
integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_right hf (hb.mono_left inf_le_left)
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely as `x` tends to `b` from the right or from the left, then the right
(resp., left) derivative of `u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` at `b` equals `c`. -/
lemma deriv_within_integral_of_tendsto_ae_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter b (𝓝[s] b) (𝓝[t] b)] (hb : tendsto f (𝓝[t] b ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c))
(hs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s b . unique_diff_within_at_Ici_Iic_univ) :
deriv_within (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) s b = c :=
(integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_right hf hb).deriv_within hs
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` is continuous
on the right or on the left at `b`, then the right (resp., left) derivative of
`u ↦ ∫ x in a..u, f x` at `b` equals `f b`. -/
lemma deriv_within_integral_right (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter b (𝓝[s] b) (𝓝[t] b)] (hb : continuous_within_at f t b)
(hs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s b . unique_diff_within_at_Ici_Iic_univ) :
deriv_within (λ u, ∫ x in a..u, f x) s b = f b :=
(integral_has_deriv_within_at_right hf hb).deriv_within hs
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely as `x` tends to `a` from the right or from the left,
then `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` has right (resp., left) derivative `-c` at `a`. -/
lemma integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter a (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] a)] (ha : tendsto f (𝓝[t] a ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c)) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) (-c) s a :=
by { simp only [integral_symm b],
exact (integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_right hf.symm ha).neg }
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` is continuous
from the left or from the right at `a`, then `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` has left (resp., right)
derivative `-f a` at `a`. -/
lemma integral_has_deriv_within_at_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter a (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] a)] (ha : continuous_within_at f t a) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) (-f a) s a :=
integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_left hf (ha.mono_left inf_le_left)
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` has a finite
limit `c` almost surely as `x` tends to `a` from the right or from the left, then the right
(resp., left) derivative of `u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` at `a` equals `-c`. -/
lemma deriv_within_integral_of_tendsto_ae_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter a (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] a)] (ha : tendsto f (𝓝[t] a ⊓ volume.ae) (𝓝 c))
(hs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s a . unique_diff_within_at_Ici_Iic_univ) :
deriv_within (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) s a = -c :=
(integral_has_deriv_within_at_of_tendsto_ae_left hf ha).deriv_within hs
/-- Fundamental theorem of calculus: if `f : ℝ → E` is integrable on `a..b` and `f x` is continuous
on the right or on the left at `a`, then the right (resp., left) derivative of
`u ↦ ∫ x in u..b, f x` at `a` equals `-f a`. -/
lemma deriv_within_integral_left (hf : interval_integrable f volume a b)
{s t : set ℝ} [FTC_filter a (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] a)] (ha : continuous_within_at f t a)
(hs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s a . unique_diff_within_at_Ici_Iic_univ) :
deriv_within (λ u, ∫ x in u..b, f x) s a = -f a :=
(integral_has_deriv_within_at_left hf ha).deriv_within hs
end interval_integral
|
5b164288421eacb55bb4c73749294c1bd6d0779b | 271e26e338b0c14544a889c31c30b39c989f2e0f | /stage0/src/Init/Control/Except.lean | 6e5ad2c9c40a543191f9da38d9c191636d7dc45c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dgorokho/lean4 | 805f99b0b60c545b64ac34ab8237a8504f89d7d4 | e949a052bad59b1c7b54a82d24d516a656487d8a | refs/heads/master | 1,607,061,363,851 | 1,578,006,086,000 | 1,578,006,086,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,456 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jared Roesch, Sebastian Ullrich
The Except monad transformer.
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Alternative
import Init.Control.Lift
import Init.Data.ToString
import Init.Control.MonadFail
universes u v w
inductive Except (ε : Type u) (α : Type v)
| error {} : ε → Except
| ok {} : α → Except
attribute [unbox] Except
instance {ε : Type u} {α : Type v} [Inhabited ε] : Inhabited (Except ε α) :=
⟨Except.error (arbitrary ε)⟩
section
variables {ε : Type u} {α : Type v}
protected def Except.toString [HasToString ε] [HasToString α] : Except ε α → String
| Except.error e => "(error " ++ toString e ++ ")"
| Except.ok a => "(ok " ++ toString a ++ ")"
protected def Except.repr [HasRepr ε] [HasRepr α] : Except ε α → String
| Except.error e => "(error " ++ repr e ++ ")"
| Except.ok a => "(ok " ++ repr a ++ ")"
instance [HasToString ε] [HasToString α] : HasToString (Except ε α) :=
⟨Except.toString⟩
instance [HasRepr ε] [HasRepr α] : HasRepr (Except ε α) :=
⟨Except.repr⟩
end
namespace Except
variables {ε : Type u}
@[inline] protected def return {α : Type v} (a : α) : Except ε α :=
Except.ok a
@[inline] protected def map {α β : Type v} (f : α → β) : Except ε α → Except ε β
| Except.error err => Except.error err
| Except.ok v => Except.ok $ f v
@[inline] protected def mapError {ε' : Type u} {α : Type v} (f : ε → ε') : Except ε α → Except ε' α
| Except.error err => Except.error $ f err
| Except.ok v => Except.ok v
@[inline] protected def bind {α β : Type v} (ma : Except ε α) (f : α → Except ε β) : Except ε β :=
match ma with
| (Except.error err) => Except.error err
| (Except.ok v) => f v
@[inline] protected def toBool {α : Type v} : Except ε α → Bool
| Except.ok _ => true
| Except.error _ => false
@[inline] protected def toOption {α : Type v} : Except ε α → Option α
| Except.ok a => some a
| Except.error _ => none
@[inline] protected def catch {α : Type u} (ma : Except ε α) (handle : ε → Except ε α) : Except ε α :=
match ma with
| Except.ok a => Except.ok a
| Except.error e => handle e
instance : Monad (Except ε) :=
{ pure := @Except.return _, bind := @Except.bind _, map := @Except.map _ }
end Except
def ExceptT (ε : Type u) (m : Type u → Type v) (α : Type u) : Type v :=
m (Except ε α)
@[inline] def ExceptT.mk {ε : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} {α : Type u} (x : m (Except ε α)) : ExceptT ε m α :=
x
@[inline] def ExceptT.run {ε : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} {α : Type u} (x : ExceptT ε m α) : m (Except ε α) :=
x
namespace ExceptT
variables {ε : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m]
@[inline] protected def pure {α : Type u} (a : α) : ExceptT ε m α :=
ExceptT.mk $ pure (Except.ok a)
@[inline] protected def bindCont {α β : Type u} (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : Except ε α → m (Except ε β)
| Except.ok a => f a
| Except.error e => pure (Except.error e)
@[inline] protected def bind {α β : Type u} (ma : ExceptT ε m α) (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : ExceptT ε m β :=
ExceptT.mk $ ma >>= ExceptT.bindCont f
@[inline] protected def map {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : ExceptT ε m β :=
ExceptT.mk $ x >>= fun a => match a with
| (Except.ok a) => pure $ Except.ok (f a)
| (Except.error e) => pure $ Except.error e
@[inline] protected def lift {α : Type u} (t : m α) : ExceptT ε m α :=
ExceptT.mk $ Except.ok <$> t
instance exceptTOfExcept : HasMonadLift (Except ε) (ExceptT ε m) :=
⟨fun α e => ExceptT.mk $ pure e⟩
instance : HasMonadLift m (ExceptT ε m) :=
⟨@ExceptT.lift _ _ _⟩
@[inline] protected def catch {α : Type u} (ma : ExceptT ε m α) (handle : ε → ExceptT ε m α) : ExceptT ε m α :=
ExceptT.mk $ ma >>= fun res => match res with
| Except.ok a => pure (Except.ok a)
| Except.error e => (handle e)
instance (m') [Monad m'] : MonadFunctor m m' (ExceptT ε m) (ExceptT ε m') :=
⟨fun _ f x => f x⟩
instance : Monad (ExceptT ε m) :=
{ pure := @ExceptT.pure _ _ _, bind := @ExceptT.bind _ _ _, map := @ExceptT.map _ _ _ }
@[inline] protected def adapt {ε' α : Type u} (f : ε → ε') : ExceptT ε m α → ExceptT ε' m α :=
fun x => ExceptT.mk $ Except.mapError f <$> x
end ExceptT
/-- An implementation of [MonadError](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mtl-2.2.2/docs/Control-Monad-Except.html#t:MonadError) -/
class MonadExcept (ε : outParam (Type u)) (m : Type v → Type w) :=
(throw {} {α : Type v} : ε → m α)
(catch {} {α : Type v} : m α → (ε → m α) → m α)
namespace MonadExcept
variables {ε : Type u} {m : Type v → Type w}
@[inline] protected def orelse [MonadExcept ε m] {α : Type v} (t₁ t₂ : m α) : m α :=
catch t₁ $ fun _ => t₂
instance [MonadExcept ε m] {α : Type v} : HasOrelse (m α) :=
⟨MonadExcept.orelse⟩
/-- Alternative orelse operator that allows to select which exception should be used.
The default is to use the first exception since the standard `orelse` uses the second. -/
@[inline] def orelse' [MonadExcept ε m] {α : Type v} (t₁ t₂ : m α) (useFirstEx := true) : m α :=
catch t₁ $ fun e₁ => catch t₂ $ fun e₂ => throw (if useFirstEx then e₁ else e₂)
@[inline] def liftExcept {ε' : Type u} [MonadExcept ε m] [HasLiftT ε' ε] [Monad m] {α : Type v} : Except ε' α → m α
| Except.error e => throw (coe e)
| Except.ok a => pure a
end MonadExcept
export MonadExcept (throw catch)
instance (m : Type u → Type v) (ε : Type u) [Monad m] : MonadExcept ε (ExceptT ε m) :=
{ throw := fun α e => ExceptT.mk $ pure (Except.error e),
catch := @ExceptT.catch ε _ _ }
instance (ε) : MonadExcept ε (Except ε) :=
{ throw := fun α => Except.error, catch := @Except.catch _ }
/-- Adapt a Monad stack, changing its top-most error Type.
Note: This class can be seen as a simplification of the more "principled" definition
```
class MonadExceptFunctor (ε ε' : outParam (Type u)) (n n' : Type u → Type u) :=
(map {} {α : Type u} : (∀ {m : Type u → Type u} [Monad m], ExceptT ε m α → ExceptT ε' m α) → n α → n' α)
```
-/
class MonadExceptAdapter (ε ε' : outParam (Type u)) (m m' : Type u → Type v) :=
(adaptExcept {} {α : Type u} : (ε → ε') → m α → m' α)
export MonadExceptAdapter (adaptExcept)
section
variables {ε ε' : Type u} {m m' : Type u → Type v}
instance monadExceptAdapterTrans {n n' : Type u → Type v} [MonadFunctor m m' n n'] [MonadExceptAdapter ε ε' m m'] : MonadExceptAdapter ε ε' n n' :=
⟨fun α f => monadMap (fun α => (adaptExcept f : m α → m' α))⟩
instance [Monad m] : MonadExceptAdapter ε ε' (ExceptT ε m) (ExceptT ε' m) :=
⟨fun α => ExceptT.adapt⟩
end
instance (ε m out) [MonadRun out m] : MonadRun (fun α => out (Except ε α)) (ExceptT ε m) :=
⟨fun α => run⟩
-- useful for implicit failures in do-notation
instance (m : Type → Type) [Monad m] : MonadFail (ExceptT String m) :=
⟨fun _ => throw⟩
/-- Execute `x` and then execute `finalizer` even if `x` threw an exception -/
@[inline] def finally {ε α β : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] [MonadExcept ε m] (x : m α) (finalizer : m β) : m α :=
catch
(do a ← x; finalizer; pure a)
(fun e => do finalizer; throw e)
|
5bf83d2e1127f29e881e8e4e0ef18553cfd243e2 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/analysis/normed_space/basic.lean | 7411998f3d590656aa5c1de5c434b2db17e16fa0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 46,231 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.algebra.restrict_scalars
import algebra.algebra.subalgebra
import analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum
import data.matrix.basic
import topology.algebra.module.basic
import topology.instances.ennreal
import topology.sequences
/-!
# Normed spaces
In this file we define (semi)normed rings, fields, spaces, and algebras. We also prove some theorems
about these definitions.
-/
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {ι : Type*}
noncomputable theory
open filter metric
open_locale topological_space big_operators nnreal ennreal uniformity pointwise
section semi_normed_ring
/-- A seminormed ring is a ring endowed with a seminorm which satisfies the inequality
`∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class semi_normed_ring (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, ring α, pseudo_metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) ≤ norm a * norm b)
/-- A normed ring is a ring endowed with a norm which satisfies the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_ring (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, ring α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) ≤ norm a * norm b)
/-- A normed ring is a seminormed ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring.to_semi_normed_ring [β : normed_ring α] : semi_normed_ring α :=
{ ..β }
/-- A seminormed commutative ring is a commutative ring endowed with a seminorm which satisfies
the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class semi_normed_comm_ring (α : Type*) extends semi_normed_ring α :=
(mul_comm : ∀ x y : α, x * y = y * x)
/-- A normed commutative ring is a commutative ring endowed with a norm which satisfies
the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_comm_ring (α : Type*) extends normed_ring α :=
(mul_comm : ∀ x y : α, x * y = y * x)
/-- A normed commutative ring is a seminormed commutative ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_comm_ring.to_semi_normed_comm_ring [β : normed_comm_ring α] :
semi_normed_comm_ring α := { ..β }
instance : normed_comm_ring punit :=
{ norm_mul := λ _ _, by simp,
..punit.normed_group,
..punit.comm_ring, }
/-- A mixin class with the axiom `∥1∥ = 1`. Many `normed_ring`s and all `normed_field`s satisfy this
axiom. -/
class norm_one_class (α : Type*) [has_norm α] [has_one α] : Prop :=
(norm_one : ∥(1:α)∥ = 1)
export norm_one_class (norm_one)
attribute [simp] norm_one
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_one [semi_normed_group α] [has_one α] [norm_one_class α] : ∥(1 : α)∥₊ = 1 :=
nnreal.eq norm_one
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_comm_ring.to_comm_ring [β : semi_normed_comm_ring α] : comm_ring α := { ..β }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring.to_normed_group [β : normed_ring α] : normed_group α := { ..β }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_ring.to_semi_normed_group [β : semi_normed_ring α] :
semi_normed_group α := { ..β }
instance prod.norm_one_class [semi_normed_group α] [has_one α] [norm_one_class α]
[semi_normed_group β] [has_one β] [norm_one_class β] :
norm_one_class (α × β) :=
⟨by simp [prod.norm_def]⟩
variables [semi_normed_ring α]
lemma norm_mul_le (a b : α) : (∥a*b∥) ≤ (∥a∥) * (∥b∥) :=
semi_normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
/-- A subalgebra of a seminormed ring is also a seminormed ring, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance subalgebra.semi_normed_ring {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : comm_ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_ring E] {_ : algebra 𝕜 E} (s : subalgebra 𝕜 E) : semi_normed_ring s :=
{ norm_mul := λ a b, norm_mul_le a.1 b.1,
..s.to_submodule.semi_normed_group }
/-- A subalgebra of a normed ring is also a normed ring, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance subalgebra.normed_ring {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : comm_ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_ring E] {_ : algebra 𝕜 E} (s : subalgebra 𝕜 E) : normed_ring s :=
{ ..s.semi_normed_ring }
lemma list.norm_prod_le' : ∀ {l : list α}, l ≠ [] → ∥l.prod∥ ≤ (l.map norm).prod
| [] h := (h rfl).elim
| [a] _ := by simp
| (a :: b :: l) _ :=
begin
rw [list.map_cons, list.prod_cons, @list.prod_cons _ _ _ ∥a∥],
refine le_trans (norm_mul_le _ _) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _)),
exact list.norm_prod_le' (list.cons_ne_nil b l)
end
lemma list.norm_prod_le [norm_one_class α] : ∀ l : list α, ∥l.prod∥ ≤ (l.map norm).prod
| [] := by simp
| (a::l) := list.norm_prod_le' (list.cons_ne_nil a l)
lemma finset.norm_prod_le' {α : Type*} [normed_comm_ring α] (s : finset ι) (hs : s.nonempty)
(f : ι → α) :
∥∏ i in s, f i∥ ≤ ∏ i in s, ∥f i∥ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩,
have : l.map f ≠ [], by simpa using hs,
simpa using list.norm_prod_le' this
end
lemma finset.norm_prod_le {α : Type*} [normed_comm_ring α] [norm_one_class α] (s : finset ι)
(f : ι → α) :
∥∏ i in s, f i∥ ≤ ∏ i in s, ∥f i∥ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩,
simpa using (l.map f).norm_prod_le
end
/-- If `α` is a seminormed ring, then `∥a^n∥≤ ∥a∥^n` for `n > 0`. See also `norm_pow_le`. -/
lemma norm_pow_le' (a : α) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 1 h := by simp
| (n+2) h := by { rw [pow_succ _ (n+1), pow_succ _ (n+1)],
exact le_trans (norm_mul_le a (a^(n+1)))
(mul_le_mul le_rfl
(norm_pow_le' (nat.succ_pos _)) (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) }
/-- If `α` is a seminormed ring with `∥1∥=1`, then `∥a^n∥≤ ∥a∥^n`. See also `norm_pow_le'`. -/
lemma norm_pow_le [norm_one_class α] (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := norm_pow_le' a n.zero_lt_succ
lemma eventually_norm_pow_le (a : α) : ∀ᶠ (n:ℕ) in at_top, ∥a ^ n∥ ≤ ∥a∥ ^ n :=
eventually_at_top.mpr ⟨1, λ b h, norm_pow_le' a (nat.succ_le_iff.mp h)⟩
/-- In a seminormed ring, the left-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_left_bound (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_left x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
norm_mul_le x
/-- In a seminormed ring, the right-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_right_bound (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_right x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
λ y, by {rw mul_comm, convert norm_mul_le y x}
/-- Seminormed ring structure on the product of two seminormed rings, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.semi_normed_ring [semi_normed_ring β] : semi_normed_ring (α × β) :=
{ norm_mul := assume x y,
calc
∥x * y∥ = ∥(x.1*y.1, x.2*y.2)∥ : rfl
... = (max ∥x.1*y.1∥ ∥x.2*y.2∥) : rfl
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥x.2∥*∥y.2∥)) :
max_le_max (norm_mul_le (x.1) (y.1)) (norm_mul_le (x.2) (y.2))
... = (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥*∥x.2∥)) : by simp[mul_comm]
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.2∥) (∥y.1∥)) :
by apply max_mul_mul_le_max_mul_max; simp [norm_nonneg]
... = (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥)) : by simp [max_comm]
... = (∥x∥*∥y∥) : rfl,
..prod.semi_normed_group }
/-- Seminormed group instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a seminormed ring. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
def matrix.semi_normed_group {n m : Type*} [fintype n] [fintype m] :
semi_normed_group (matrix n m α) :=
pi.semi_normed_group
local attribute [instance] matrix.semi_normed_group
lemma norm_matrix_le_iff {n m : Type*} [fintype n] [fintype m] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r)
{A : matrix n m α} :
∥A∥ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i j, ∥A i j∥ ≤ r :=
by simp [pi_norm_le_iff hr]
end semi_normed_ring
section normed_ring
variables [normed_ring α]
lemma units.norm_pos [nontrivial α] (x : αˣ) : 0 < ∥(x:α)∥ :=
norm_pos_iff.mpr (units.ne_zero x)
/-- Normed ring structure on the product of two normed rings, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_ring [normed_ring β] : normed_ring (α × β) :=
{ norm_mul := norm_mul_le,
..prod.semi_normed_group }
/-- Normed group instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a normed ring. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
def matrix.normed_group {n m : Type*} [fintype n] [fintype m] : normed_group (matrix n m α) :=
pi.normed_group
end normed_ring
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_ring_top_monoid [semi_normed_ring α] : has_continuous_mul α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
begin
have : ∀ e : α × α, ∥e.1 * e.2 - x.1 * x.2∥ ≤ ∥e.1∥ * ∥e.2 - x.2∥ + ∥e.1 - x.1∥ * ∥x.2∥,
{ intro e,
calc ∥e.1 * e.2 - x.1 * x.2∥ ≤ ∥e.1 * (e.2 - x.2) + (e.1 - x.1) * x.2∥ :
by rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel]
... ≤ ∥e.1∥ * ∥e.2 - x.2∥ + ∥e.1 - x.1∥ * ∥x.2∥ :
norm_add_le_of_le (norm_mul_le _ _) (norm_mul_le _ _) },
refine squeeze_zero (λ e, norm_nonneg _) this _,
convert ((continuous_fst.tendsto x).norm.mul ((continuous_snd.tendsto x).sub
tendsto_const_nhds).norm).add
(((continuous_fst.tendsto x).sub tendsto_const_nhds).norm.mul _),
show tendsto _ _ _, from tendsto_const_nhds,
simp
end ⟩
/-- A seminormed ring is a topological ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_top_ring [semi_normed_ring α] : topological_ring α := { }
/-- A normed field is a field with a norm satisfying ∥x y∥ = ∥x∥ ∥y∥. -/
class normed_field (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, field α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul' : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) = norm a * norm b)
/-- A nondiscrete normed field is a normed field in which there is an element of norm different from
`0` and `1`. This makes it possible to bring any element arbitrarily close to `0` by multiplication
by the powers of any element, and thus to relate algebra and topology. -/
class nondiscrete_normed_field (α : Type*) extends normed_field α :=
(non_trivial : ∃x:α, 1<∥x∥)
namespace normed_field
section normed_field
variables [normed_field α]
@[simp] lemma norm_mul (a b : α) : ∥a * b∥ = ∥a∥ * ∥b∥ :=
normed_field.norm_mul' a b
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance to_normed_comm_ring : normed_comm_ring α :=
{ norm_mul := λ a b, (norm_mul a b).le, ..‹normed_field α› }
@[priority 900]
instance to_norm_one_class : norm_one_class α :=
⟨mul_left_cancel₀ (mt norm_eq_zero.1 (@one_ne_zero α _ _)) $
by rw [← norm_mul, mul_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_mul (a b : α) : ∥a * b∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ * ∥b∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_mul a b
/-- `norm` as a `monoid_with_zero_hom`. -/
@[simps] def norm_hom : α →*₀ ℝ := ⟨norm, norm_zero, norm_one, norm_mul⟩
/-- `nnnorm` as a `monoid_with_zero_hom`. -/
@[simps] def nnnorm_hom : α →*₀ ℝ≥0 := ⟨nnnorm, nnnorm_zero, nnnorm_one, nnnorm_mul⟩
@[simp] lemma norm_pow (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a ^ n∥ = ∥a∥ ^ n :=
(norm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ).map_pow a
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ∥a ^ n∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ ^ n :=
(nnnorm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ≥0).map_pow a n
@[simp] lemma norm_prod (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∥∏ b in s, f b∥ = ∏ b in s, ∥f b∥ :=
(norm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ).map_prod f s
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_prod (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∥∏ b in s, f b∥₊ = ∏ b in s, ∥f b∥₊ :=
(nnnorm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ≥0).map_prod f s
@[simp] lemma norm_div (a b : α) : ∥a / b∥ = ∥a∥ / ∥b∥ := (norm_hom : α →*₀ ℝ).map_div a b
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_div (a b : α) : ∥a / b∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ / ∥b∥₊ := (nnnorm_hom : α →*₀ ℝ≥0).map_div a b
@[simp] lemma norm_inv (a : α) : ∥a⁻¹∥ = ∥a∥⁻¹ := (norm_hom : α →*₀ ℝ).map_inv a
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_inv (a : α) : ∥a⁻¹∥₊ = ∥a∥₊⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_zpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ∥a^n∥ = ∥a∥^n := (norm_hom : α →*₀ ℝ).map_zpow
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_zpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ∥a ^ n∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ ^ n :=
(nnnorm_hom : α →*₀ ℝ≥0).map_zpow
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance : has_continuous_inv₀ α :=
begin
refine ⟨λ r r0, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 _⟩,
have r0' : 0 < ∥r∥ := norm_pos_iff.2 r0,
rcases exists_between r0' with ⟨ε, ε0, εr⟩,
have : ∀ᶠ e in 𝓝 r, ∥e⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ ≤ ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ε,
{ filter_upwards [(is_open_lt continuous_const continuous_norm).eventually_mem εr] with e he,
have e0 : e ≠ 0 := norm_pos_iff.1 (ε0.trans he),
calc ∥e⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ = ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ∥e∥ : by field_simp [mul_comm]
... ≤ ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ε :
div_le_div_of_le_left (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) ε0 he.le },
refine squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall $ λ _, norm_nonneg _) this _,
refine (continuous_const.sub continuous_id).norm.div_const.div_const.tendsto' _ _ _,
simp
end
end normed_field
variables (α) [nondiscrete_normed_field α]
lemma exists_one_lt_norm : ∃x : α, 1 < ∥x∥ := ‹nondiscrete_normed_field α›.non_trivial
lemma exists_norm_lt_one : ∃x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < 1 :=
begin
rcases exists_one_lt_norm α with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine ⟨y⁻¹, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [inv_eq_zero, ne.def, norm_pos_iff],
rintro rfl,
rw norm_zero at hy,
exact lt_asymm zero_lt_one hy },
{ simp [inv_lt_one hy] }
end
lemma exists_lt_norm (r : ℝ) : ∃ x : α, r < ∥x∥ :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := pow_unbounded_of_one_lt r hw in
⟨w^n, by rwa norm_pow⟩
lemma exists_norm_lt {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : ∃ x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < r :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hle, hlt⟩ := exists_mem_Ioc_zpow hr hw in
⟨w^n, by { rw norm_zpow; exact zpow_pos_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hw) _},
by rwa norm_zpow⟩
variable {α}
@[instance]
lemma punctured_nhds_ne_bot (x : α) : ne_bot (𝓝[≠] x) :=
begin
rw [← mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot, metric.mem_closure_iff],
rintros ε ε0,
rcases normed_field.exists_norm_lt α ε0 with ⟨b, hb0, hbε⟩,
refine ⟨x + b, mt (set.mem_singleton_iff.trans add_right_eq_self).1 $ norm_pos_iff.1 hb0, _⟩,
rwa [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel'],
end
@[instance]
lemma nhds_within_is_unit_ne_bot : ne_bot (𝓝[{x : α | is_unit x}] 0) :=
by simpa only [is_unit_iff_ne_zero] using punctured_nhds_ne_bot (0:α)
end normed_field
instance : normed_field ℝ :=
{ norm_mul' := abs_mul,
.. real.normed_group }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℝ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
namespace real
lemma norm_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∥x∥ = x :=
abs_of_nonneg hx
lemma norm_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : ∥x∥ = -x :=
abs_of_nonpos hx
@[simp] lemma norm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℝ)∥ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℝ)∥₊ = n := nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_two : ∥(2 : ℝ)∥ = 2 := abs_of_pos (@zero_lt_two ℝ _ _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_two : ∥(2 : ℝ)∥₊ = 2 := nnreal.eq $ by simp
lemma nnnorm_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∥x∥₊ = ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_of_nonneg hx
lemma ennnorm_eq_of_real {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (∥x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real x :=
by { rw [← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, norm_of_nonneg hx] }
lemma of_real_le_ennnorm (x : ℝ) : ennreal.of_real x ≤ ∥x∥₊ :=
begin
by_cases hx : 0 ≤ x,
{ rw real.ennnorm_eq_of_real hx, refl' },
{ rw [ennreal.of_real_eq_zero.2 (le_of_lt (not_le.1 hx))],
exact bot_le }
end
/-- If `E` is a nontrivial topological module over `ℝ`, then `E` has no isolated points.
This is a particular case of `module.punctured_nhds_ne_bot`. -/
instance punctured_nhds_module_ne_bot
{E : Type*} [add_comm_group E] [topological_space E] [has_continuous_add E] [nontrivial E]
[module ℝ E] [has_continuous_smul ℝ E] (x : E) :
ne_bot (𝓝[≠] x) :=
module.punctured_nhds_ne_bot ℝ E x
end real
namespace nnreal
open_locale nnreal
@[simp] lemma norm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : ∥(x : ℝ)∥ = x :=
by rw [real.norm_eq_abs, x.abs_eq]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : ∥(x : ℝ)∥₊ = x :=
nnreal.eq $ real.norm_of_nonneg x.2
end nnreal
@[simp] lemma norm_norm [semi_normed_group α] (x : α) : ∥∥x∥∥ = ∥x∥ :=
real.norm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_norm [semi_normed_group α] (a : α) : ∥∥a∥∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa [real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a)]
/-- A restatement of `metric_space.tendsto_at_top` in terms of the norm. -/
lemma normed_group.tendsto_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {β : Type*} [semi_normed_group β]
{f : α → β} {b : β} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → ∥f n - b∥ < ε :=
(at_top_basis.tendsto_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).trans (by simp [dist_eq_norm])
/--
A variant of `normed_group.tendsto_at_top` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
lemma normed_group.tendsto_at_top' [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [no_max_order α]
{β : Type*} [semi_normed_group β]
{f : α → β} {b : β} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N < n → ∥f n - b∥ < ε :=
(at_top_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).trans (by simp [dist_eq_norm])
instance : normed_comm_ring ℤ :=
{ norm := λ n, ∥(n : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul := λ m n, le_of_eq $ by simp only [norm, int.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ m n, by simp only [int.dist_eq, norm, int.cast_sub],
mul_comm := mul_comm }
@[norm_cast] lemma int.norm_cast_real (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℝ)∥ = ∥m∥ := rfl
lemma int.norm_eq_abs (n : ℤ) : ∥n∥ = |n| := rfl
lemma nnreal.coe_nat_abs (n : ℤ) : (n.nat_abs : ℝ≥0) = ∥n∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ calc ((n.nat_abs : ℝ≥0) : ℝ)
= (n.nat_abs : ℤ) : by simp only [int.cast_coe_nat, nnreal.coe_nat_cast]
... = |n| : by simp only [← int.abs_eq_nat_abs, int.cast_abs]
... = ∥n∥ : rfl
instance : norm_one_class ℤ :=
⟨by simp [← int.norm_cast_real]⟩
instance : normed_field ℚ :=
{ norm := λ r, ∥(r : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul' := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [norm, rat.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [rat.dist_eq, norm, rat.cast_sub] }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℚ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma rat.norm_cast_real (r : ℚ) : ∥(r : ℝ)∥ = ∥r∥ := rfl
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma int.norm_cast_rat (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℚ)∥ = ∥m∥ :=
by rw [← rat.norm_cast_real, ← int.norm_cast_real]; congr' 1; norm_cast
-- Now that we've installed the norm on `ℤ`,
-- we can state some lemmas about `nsmul` and `zsmul`.
section
variables [semi_normed_group α]
lemma norm_nsmul_le (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥ ≤ n * ∥a∥ :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp only [norm_zero, nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul] },
simp only [nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_smul, add_mul, one_mul, nat.cast_add,
nat.cast_one, one_nsmul],
exact norm_add_le_of_le ih le_rfl
end
lemma norm_zsmul_le (n : ℤ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥ ≤ ∥n∥ * ∥a∥ :=
begin
induction n with n n,
{ simp only [int.of_nat_eq_coe, coe_nat_zsmul],
convert norm_nsmul_le n a,
exact nat.abs_cast n },
{ simp only [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, neg_smul, norm_neg, coe_nat_zsmul],
convert norm_nsmul_le n.succ a,
exact nat.abs_cast n.succ, }
end
lemma nnnorm_nsmul_le (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥₊ ≤ n * ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa only [←nnreal.coe_le_coe, nnreal.coe_mul, nnreal.coe_nat_cast]
using norm_nsmul_le n a
lemma nnnorm_zsmul_le (n : ℤ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥₊ ≤ ∥n∥₊ * ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa only [←nnreal.coe_le_coe, nnreal.coe_mul] using norm_zsmul_le n a
end
section semi_normed_group
section prio
set_option extends_priority 920
-- Here, we set a rather high priority for the instance `[normed_space α β] : module α β`
-- to take precedence over `semiring.to_module` as this leads to instance paths with better
-- unification properties.
/-- A normed space over a normed field is a vector space endowed with a norm which satisfies the
equality `∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥`. We require only `∥c • x∥ ≤ ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in the definition, then prove
`∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in `norm_smul`.
Note that since this requires `semi_normed_group` and not `normed_group`, this typeclass can be
used for "semi normed spaces" too, just as `module` can be used for "semi modules". -/
class normed_space (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [normed_field α] [semi_normed_group β]
extends module α β :=
(norm_smul_le : ∀ (a:α) (b:β), ∥a • b∥ ≤ ∥a∥ * ∥b∥)
end prio
variables [normed_field α] [semi_normed_group β]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_space.has_bounded_smul [normed_space α β] : has_bounded_smul α β :=
{ dist_smul_pair' := λ x y₁ y₂,
by simpa [dist_eq_norm, smul_sub] using normed_space.norm_smul_le x (y₁ - y₂),
dist_pair_smul' := λ x₁ x₂ y,
by simpa [dist_eq_norm, sub_smul] using normed_space.norm_smul_le (x₁ - x₂) y }
instance normed_field.to_normed_space : normed_space α α :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a b, le_of_eq (normed_field.norm_mul a b) }
lemma norm_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : ∥s • x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ :=
begin
by_cases h : s = 0,
{ simp [h] },
{ refine le_antisymm (normed_space.norm_smul_le s x) _,
calc ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥s⁻¹ • s • x∥ : by rw [inv_smul_smul₀ h]
... ≤ ∥s∥ * (∥s⁻¹∥ * ∥s • x∥) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (normed_space.norm_smul_le _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = ∥s • x∥ :
by rw [normed_field.norm_inv, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel (mt norm_eq_zero.1 h), one_mul] }
end
@[simp] lemma abs_norm_eq_norm (z : β) : |∥z∥| = ∥z∥ :=
(abs_eq (norm_nonneg z)).mpr (or.inl rfl)
lemma dist_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) : dist (s • x) (s • y) = ∥s∥ * dist x y :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, (norm_smul _ _).symm, smul_sub]
lemma nnnorm_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : ∥s • x∥₊ = ∥s∥₊ * ∥x∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_smul s x
lemma nndist_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) :
nndist (s • x) (s • y) = ∥s∥₊ * nndist x y :=
nnreal.eq $ dist_smul s x y
lemma norm_smul_of_nonneg [normed_space ℝ β] {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 ≤ t) (x : β) :
∥t • x∥ = t * ∥x∥ := by rw [norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ht]
variables {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] [normed_space α E]
variables {F : Type*} [semi_normed_group F] [normed_space α F]
theorem eventually_nhds_norm_smul_sub_lt (c : α) (x : E) {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, ∥c • (y - x)∥ < ε :=
have tendsto (λ y, ∥c • (y - x)∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0),
from (continuous_const.smul (continuous_id.sub continuous_const)).norm.tendsto' _ _ (by simp),
this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds h)
theorem closure_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
closure (ball x r) = closed_ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm closure_ball_subset_closed_ball (λ y hy, _),
have : continuous_within_at (λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x) (set.Ico 0 1) 1 :=
((continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const).continuous_within_at,
convert this.mem_closure _ _,
{ rw [one_smul, sub_add_cancel] },
{ simp [closure_Ico (@zero_ne_one ℝ _ _), zero_le_one] },
{ rintros c ⟨hc0, hc1⟩,
rw [set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg hc0, mul_comm, ← mul_one r],
rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hy,
apply mul_lt_mul'; assumption }
end
theorem frontier_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (ball x r) = sphere x r :=
begin
rw [frontier, closure_ball x hr, is_open_ball.interior_eq],
ext x, exact (@eq_iff_le_not_lt ℝ _ _ _).symm
end
theorem interior_closed_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm _ ball_subset_interior_closed_ball,
intros y hy,
rcases le_iff_lt_or_eq.1 (mem_closed_ball.1 $ interior_subset hy) with hr|rfl, { exact hr },
set f : ℝ → E := λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x,
suffices : f ⁻¹' closed_ball x (dist y x) ⊆ set.Icc (-1) 1,
{ have hfc : continuous f := (continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const,
have hf1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ f ⁻¹' (interior (closed_ball x $ dist y x)), by simpa [f],
have h1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ interior (set.Icc (-1:ℝ) 1) :=
interior_mono this (preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hfc hf1),
contrapose h1,
simp },
intros c hc,
rw [set.mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_le_mul_right hr],
simpa [f, dist_eq_norm, norm_smul] using hc
end
theorem frontier_closed_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball x hr,
closed_ball_diff_ball]
/-- A (semi) normed real vector space is homeomorphic to the unit ball in the same space.
This homeomorphism sends `x : E` to `(1 + ∥x∥)⁻¹ • x`.
In many cases the actual implementation is not important, so we don't mark the projection lemmas
`homeomorph_unit_ball_apply_coe` and `homeomorph_unit_ball_symm_apply` as `@[simp]`. -/
@[simps { attrs := [] }]
def homeomorph_unit_ball {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] :
E ≃ₜ ball (0 : E) 1 :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨(1 + ∥x∥)⁻¹ • x, begin
have : ∥x∥ < |1 + ∥x∥| := (lt_one_add _).trans_le (le_abs_self _),
rwa [mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul,
div_lt_one ((norm_nonneg x).trans_lt this)],
end⟩,
inv_fun := λ x, (1 - ∥(x : E)∥)⁻¹ • (x : E),
left_inv := λ x,
begin
have : 0 < 1 + ∥x∥ := (norm_nonneg x).trans_lt (lt_one_add _),
field_simp [this.ne', abs_of_pos this, norm_smul, smul_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_div]
end,
right_inv := λ x, subtype.ext
begin
have : 0 < 1 - ∥(x : E)∥ := sub_pos.2 (mem_ball_zero_iff.1 x.2),
field_simp [norm_smul, smul_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_div, abs_of_pos this, this.ne']
end,
continuous_to_fun := continuous_subtype_mk _ $
((continuous_const.add continuous_norm).inv₀
(λ x, ((norm_nonneg x).trans_lt (lt_one_add _)).ne')).smul continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous.smul
((continuous_const.sub continuous_subtype_coe.norm).inv₀ $
λ x, (sub_pos.2 $ mem_ball_zero_iff.1 x.2).ne') continuous_subtype_coe }
variables (α)
lemma ne_neg_of_mem_sphere [char_zero α] {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (0:E) r) : x ≠ - x :=
λ h, ne_zero_of_mem_sphere hr x (eq_zero_of_eq_neg α (by { conv_lhs {rw h}, simp }))
lemma ne_neg_of_mem_unit_sphere [char_zero α] (x : sphere (0:E) 1) : x ≠ - x :=
ne_neg_of_mem_sphere α one_ne_zero x
variables {α}
open normed_field
/-- The product of two normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_space : normed_space α (E × F) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, le_of_eq $ by simp [prod.norm_def, norm_smul, mul_max_of_nonneg],
..prod.normed_group,
..prod.module }
/-- The product of finitely many normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_space {E : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (E i)]
[∀i, normed_space α (E i)] : normed_space α (Πi, E i) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a f, le_of_eq $
show (↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), ∥a • f b∥₊)) : ℝ) =
∥a∥₊ * ↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), ∥f b∥₊)),
by simp only [(nnreal.coe_mul _ _).symm, nnreal.mul_finset_sup, nnnorm_smul] }
/-- A subspace of a normed space is also a normed space, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance submodule.normed_space {𝕜 R : Type*} [has_scalar 𝕜 R] [normed_field 𝕜] [ring R]
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [module R E]
[is_scalar_tower 𝕜 R E] (s : submodule R E) :
normed_space 𝕜 s :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ norm_smul c (x : E) }
/-- If there is a scalar `c` with `∥c∥>1`, then any element with nonzero norm can be
moved by scalar multiplication to any shell of width `∥c∥`. Also recap information on the norm of
the rescaling element that shows up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell_semi_normed {c : α} (hc : 1 < ∥c∥) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E}
(hx : ∥x∥ ≠ 0) : ∃d:α, d ≠ 0 ∧ ∥d • x∥ < ε ∧ (ε/∥c∥ ≤ ∥d • x∥) ∧ (∥d∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥) :=
begin
have xεpos : 0 < ∥x∥/ε := div_pos ((ne.symm hx).le_iff_lt.1 (norm_nonneg x)) εpos,
rcases exists_mem_Ico_zpow xεpos hc with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have cpos : 0 < ∥c∥ := lt_trans (zero_lt_one : (0 :ℝ) < 1) hc,
have cnpos : 0 < ∥c^(n+1)∥ := by { rw norm_zpow, exact lt_trans xεpos hn.2 },
refine ⟨(c^(n+1))⁻¹, _, _, _, _⟩,
show (c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ ≠ 0,
by rwa [ne.def, inv_eq_zero, ← ne.def, ← norm_pos_iff],
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥ < ε,
{ rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff cnpos, mul_comm, norm_zpow],
exact (div_lt_iff εpos).1 (hn.2) },
show ε / ∥c∥ ≤ ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥,
{ rw [div_le_iff cpos, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_zpow, zpow_add₀ (ne_of_gt cpos),
zpow_one, mul_inv_rev₀, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt cpos),
one_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff (zpow_pos_of_pos cpos _), mul_comm],
exact (le_div_iff εpos).1 hn.1 },
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
{ have : ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥ = ε⁻¹ * ∥x∥ * ∥c∥, by ring,
rw [norm_inv, inv_inv₀, norm_zpow, zpow_add₀ (ne_of_gt cpos), zpow_one, this, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hn.1 (norm_nonneg _) }
end
end semi_normed_group
section normed_group
variables [normed_field α]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space α E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space α F]
open normed_field
/-- While this may appear identical to `normed_space.to_module`, it contains an implicit argument
involving `normed_group.to_semi_normed_group` that typeclass inference has trouble inferring.
Specifically, the following instance cannot be found without this `normed_space.to_module'`:
```lean
example
(𝕜 ι : Type*) (E : ι → Type*)
[normed_field 𝕜] [Π i, normed_group (E i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (E i)] :
Π i, module 𝕜 (E i) := by apply_instance
```
[This Zulip thread](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typeclass.20resolution.20under.20binders/near/245151099)
gives some more context. -/
@[priority 100]
instance normed_space.to_module' : module α F := normed_space.to_module
theorem interior_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with hr|rfl|hr,
{ simp [closed_ball_eq_empty.2 hr, ball_eq_empty.2 hr.le] },
{ rw [closed_ball_zero, ball_zero, interior_singleton] },
{ exact interior_closed_ball x hr }
end
theorem frontier_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball' x r, closed_ball_diff_ball]
variables {α}
/-- If there is a scalar `c` with `∥c∥>1`, then any element can be moved by scalar multiplication to
any shell of width `∥c∥`. Also recap information on the norm of the rescaling element that shows
up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell {c : α} (hc : 1 < ∥c∥) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃d:α, d ≠ 0 ∧ ∥d • x∥ < ε ∧ (ε/∥c∥ ≤ ∥d • x∥) ∧ (∥d∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥) :=
rescale_to_shell_semi_normed hc εpos (ne_of_lt (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)).symm
section
local attribute [instance] matrix.normed_group
/-- Normed space instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a normed field. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
def matrix.normed_space {α : Type*} [normed_field α] {n m : Type*} [fintype n] [fintype m] :
normed_space α (matrix n m α) :=
pi.normed_space
end
end normed_group
section normed_space_nondiscrete
variables (𝕜 E : Type*) [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
[nontrivial E]
include 𝕜
/-- If `E` is a nontrivial normed space over a nondiscrete normed field `𝕜`, then `E` is unbounded:
for any `c : ℝ`, there exists a vector `x : E` with norm strictly greater than `c`. -/
lemma normed_space.exists_lt_norm (c : ℝ) : ∃ x : E, c < ∥x∥ :=
begin
rcases exists_ne (0 : E) with ⟨x, hx⟩,
rcases normed_field.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 (c / ∥x∥) with ⟨r, hr⟩,
use r • x,
rwa [norm_smul, ← div_lt_iff],
rwa norm_pos_iff
end
protected lemma normed_space.unbounded_univ : ¬bounded (set.univ : set E) :=
λ h, let ⟨R, hR⟩ := bounded_iff_forall_norm_le.1 h, ⟨x, hx⟩ := normed_space.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 E R
in hx.not_le (hR x trivial)
/-- A normed vector space over a nondiscrete normed field is a noncompact space. This cannot be
an instance because in order to apply it, Lean would have to search for `normed_space 𝕜 E` with
unknown `𝕜`. We register this as an instance in two cases: `𝕜 = E` and `𝕜 = ℝ`. -/
protected lemma normed_space.noncompact_space : noncompact_space E :=
⟨λ h, normed_space.unbounded_univ 𝕜 _ h.bounded⟩
@[priority 100]
instance nondiscrete_normed_field.noncompact_space : noncompact_space 𝕜 :=
normed_space.noncompact_space 𝕜 𝕜
omit 𝕜
@[priority 100]
instance real_normed_space.noncompact_space [normed_space ℝ E] : noncompact_space E :=
normed_space.noncompact_space ℝ E
end normed_space_nondiscrete
section normed_algebra
/-- A normed algebra `𝕜'` over `𝕜` is an algebra endowed with a norm for which the
embedding of `𝕜` in `𝕜'` is an isometry. -/
class normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
extends algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
(norm_algebra_map_eq : ∀x:𝕜, ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥)
@[simp] lemma norm_algebra_map_eq {𝕜 : Type*} (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
[h : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] (x : 𝕜) : ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
normed_algebra.norm_algebra_map_eq _
/-- In a normed algebra, the inclusion of the base field in the extended field is an isometry. -/
lemma algebra_map_isometry (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
[normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : isometry (algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜') :=
begin
refine isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 (λx y, _),
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm, ← ring_hom.map_sub, norm_algebra_map_eq],
end
variables (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
@[priority 100]
instance normed_algebra.to_normed_space [semi_normed_ring 𝕜'] [h : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] :
normed_space 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, calc
∥s • x∥ = ∥((algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜') s) * x∥ : by { rw h.smul_def', refl }
... ≤ ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' s∥ * ∥x∥ : semi_normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
... = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ : by rw norm_algebra_map_eq,
..h }
/-- While this may appear identical to `normed_algebra.to_normed_space`, it contains an implicit
argument involving `normed_ring.to_semi_normed_ring` that typeclass inference has trouble inferring.
Specifically, the following instance cannot be found without this `normed_space.to_module'`:
```lean
example
(𝕜 ι : Type*) (E : ι → Type*)
[normed_field 𝕜] [Π i, normed_ring (E i)] [Π i, normed_algebra 𝕜 (E i)] :
Π i, module 𝕜 (E i) := by apply_instance
```
See `normed_space.to_module'` for a similar situation. -/
@[priority 100]
instance normed_algebra.to_normed_space' [normed_ring 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] :
normed_space 𝕜 𝕜' := by apply_instance
instance normed_algebra.id : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜 :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := by simp,
.. algebra.id 𝕜}
variables (𝕜') [semi_normed_ring 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
include 𝕜
lemma normed_algebra.norm_one : ∥(1:𝕜')∥ = 1 :=
by simpa using (norm_algebra_map_eq 𝕜' (1:𝕜))
lemma normed_algebra.norm_one_class : norm_one_class 𝕜' :=
⟨normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜 𝕜'⟩
lemma normed_algebra.zero_ne_one : (0:𝕜') ≠ 1 :=
begin
refine (ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero _).symm,
rw normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜 𝕜', norm_num,
end
lemma normed_algebra.nontrivial : nontrivial 𝕜' :=
⟨⟨0, 1, normed_algebra.zero_ne_one 𝕜 𝕜'⟩⟩
end normed_algebra
section restrict_scalars
variables (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
(E : Type*) [semi_normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜' E]
/-- Warning: This declaration should be used judiciously.
Please consider using `is_scalar_tower` instead.
`𝕜`-normed space structure induced by a `𝕜'`-normed space structure when `𝕜'` is a
normed algebra over `𝕜`. Not registered as an instance as `𝕜'` can not be inferred.
The type synonym `restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E` will be endowed with this instance by default.
-/
def normed_space.restrict_scalars : normed_space 𝕜 E :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ begin
change ∥(algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' c) • x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
simp [norm_smul]
end,
..restrict_scalars.module 𝕜 𝕜' E }
instance {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*} [I : semi_normed_group E] :
semi_normed_group (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*} [I : normed_group E] :
normed_group (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance module.restrict_scalars.normed_space_orig {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*}
[normed_field 𝕜'] [semi_normed_group E] [I : normed_space 𝕜' E] :
normed_space 𝕜' (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance : normed_space 𝕜 (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) :=
(normed_space.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E : normed_space 𝕜 E)
end restrict_scalars
section cauchy_product
/-! ## Multiplying two infinite sums in a normed ring
In this section, we prove various results about `(∑' x : ι, f x) * (∑' y : ι', g y)` in a normed
ring. There are similar results proven in `topology/algebra/infinite_sum` (e.g `tsum_mul_tsum`),
but in a normed ring we get summability results which aren't true in general.
We first establish results about arbitrary index types, `β` and `γ`, and then we specialize to
`β = γ = ℕ` to prove the Cauchy product formula
(see `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm`).
### Arbitrary index types
-/
variables {ι' : Type*} [normed_ring α]
open finset
open_locale classical
lemma summable.mul_of_nonneg {f : ι → ℝ} {g : ι' → ℝ}
(hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) (hf' : 0 ≤ f) (hg' : 0 ≤ g) :
summable (λ (x : ι × ι'), f x.1 * g x.2) :=
let ⟨s, hf⟩ := hf in
let ⟨t, hg⟩ := hg in
suffices this : ∀ u : finset (ι × ι'), ∑ x in u, f x.1 * g x.2 ≤ s*t,
from summable_of_sum_le (λ x, mul_nonneg (hf' _) (hg' _)) this,
assume u,
calc ∑ x in u, f x.1 * g x.2
≤ ∑ x in (u.image prod.fst).product (u.image prod.snd), f x.1 * g x.2 :
sum_mono_set_of_nonneg (λ x, mul_nonneg (hf' _) (hg' _)) subset_product
... = ∑ x in u.image prod.fst, ∑ y in u.image prod.snd, f x * g y : sum_product
... = ∑ x in u.image prod.fst, f x * ∑ y in u.image prod.snd, g y :
sum_congr rfl (λ x _, mul_sum.symm)
... ≤ ∑ x in u.image prod.fst, f x * t :
sum_le_sum
(λ x _, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sum_le_has_sum _ (λ _ _, hg' _) hg) (hf' _))
... = (∑ x in u.image prod.fst, f x) * t : sum_mul.symm
... ≤ s * t :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (sum_le_has_sum _ (λ _ _, hf' _) hf) (hg.nonneg $ λ _, hg' _)
lemma summable.mul_norm {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α}
(hf : summable (λ x, ∥f x∥)) (hg : summable (λ x, ∥g x∥)) :
summable (λ (x : ι × ι'), ∥f x.1 * g x.2∥) :=
summable_of_nonneg_of_le (λ x, norm_nonneg (f x.1 * g x.2)) (λ x, norm_mul_le (f x.1) (g x.2))
(hf.mul_of_nonneg hg (λ x, norm_nonneg $ f x) (λ x, norm_nonneg $ g x) : _)
lemma summable_mul_of_summable_norm [complete_space α] {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α}
(hf : summable (λ x, ∥f x∥)) (hg : summable (λ x, ∥g x∥)) :
summable (λ (x : ι × ι'), f x.1 * g x.2) :=
summable_of_summable_norm (hf.mul_norm hg)
/-- Product of two infinites sums indexed by arbitrary types.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum` if `f` and `g` are *not* absolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum_of_summable_norm [complete_space α] {f : ι → α} {g : ι' → α}
(hf : summable (λ x, ∥f x∥)) (hg : summable (λ x, ∥g x∥)) :
(∑' x, f x) * (∑' y, g y) = (∑' z : ι × ι', f z.1 * g z.2) :=
tsum_mul_tsum (summable_of_summable_norm hf) (summable_of_summable_norm hg)
(summable_mul_of_summable_norm hf hg)
/-! ### `ℕ`-indexed families (Cauchy product)
We prove two versions of the Cauchy product formula. The first one is
`tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range_of_summable_norm`, where the `n`-th term is a sum over
`finset.range (n+1)` involving `nat` substraction.
In order to avoid `nat` substraction, we also provide
`tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm`,
where the `n`-th term is a sum over all pairs `(k, l)` such that `k+l=n`, which corresponds to the
`finset` `finset.nat.antidiagonal n`. -/
section nat
open finset.nat
lemma summable_norm_sum_mul_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm {f g : ℕ → α}
(hf : summable (λ x, ∥f x∥)) (hg : summable (λ x, ∥g x∥)) :
summable (λ n, ∥∑ kl in antidiagonal n, f kl.1 * g kl.2∥) :=
begin
have := summable_sum_mul_antidiagonal_of_summable_mul
(summable.mul_of_nonneg hf hg (λ _, norm_nonneg _) (λ _, norm_nonneg _)),
refine summable_of_nonneg_of_le (λ _, norm_nonneg _) _ this,
intros n,
calc ∥∑ kl in antidiagonal n, f kl.1 * g kl.2∥
≤ ∑ kl in antidiagonal n, ∥f kl.1 * g kl.2∥ : norm_sum_le _ _
... ≤ ∑ kl in antidiagonal n, ∥f kl.1∥ * ∥g kl.2∥ : sum_le_sum (λ i _, norm_mul_le _ _)
end
/-- The Cauchy product formula for the product of two infinite sums indexed by `ℕ`,
expressed by summing on `finset.nat.antidiagonal`.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal` if `f` and `g` are
*not* absolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm [complete_space α] {f g : ℕ → α}
(hf : summable (λ x, ∥f x∥)) (hg : summable (λ x, ∥g x∥)) :
(∑' n, f n) * (∑' n, g n) = ∑' n, ∑ kl in antidiagonal n, f kl.1 * g kl.2 :=
tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal (summable_of_summable_norm hf) (summable_of_summable_norm hg)
(summable_mul_of_summable_norm hf hg)
lemma summable_norm_sum_mul_range_of_summable_norm {f g : ℕ → α}
(hf : summable (λ x, ∥f x∥)) (hg : summable (λ x, ∥g x∥)) :
summable (λ n, ∥∑ k in range (n+1), f k * g (n - k)∥) :=
begin
simp_rw ← sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ (λ k l, f k * g l),
exact summable_norm_sum_mul_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm hf hg
end
/-- The Cauchy product formula for the product of two infinite sums indexed by `ℕ`,
expressed by summing on `finset.range`.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range` if `f` and `g` are
*not* absolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range_of_summable_norm [complete_space α] {f g : ℕ → α}
(hf : summable (λ x, ∥f x∥)) (hg : summable (λ x, ∥g x∥)) :
(∑' n, f n) * (∑' n, g n) = ∑' n, ∑ k in range (n+1), f k * g (n - k) :=
begin
simp_rw ← sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ (λ k l, f k * g l),
exact tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm hf hg
end
end nat
end cauchy_product
section ring_hom_isometric
variables {R₁ : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
/-- This class states that a ring homomorphism is isometric. This is a sufficient assumption
for a continuous semilinear map to be bounded and this is the main use for this typeclass. -/
class ring_hom_isometric [semiring R₁] [semiring R₂] [has_norm R₁] [has_norm R₂]
(σ : R₁ →+* R₂) : Prop :=
(is_iso : ∀ {x : R₁}, ∥σ x∥ = ∥x∥)
attribute [simp] ring_hom_isometric.is_iso
variables [semi_normed_ring R₁] [semi_normed_ring R₂] [semi_normed_ring R₃]
instance ring_hom_isometric.ids : ring_hom_isometric (ring_hom.id R₁) :=
⟨λ x, rfl⟩
end ring_hom_isometric
|
3bf5eab64f9a062fb5aa3669245babab1a54b0f2 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/analysis/normed_space/multilinear.lean | e2db42edbc5b3d73ec1e677dd8f471e707a0bac6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 80,346 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.normed_space.operator_norm
import topology.algebra.module.multilinear
/-!
# Operator norm on the space of continuous multilinear maps
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
When `f` is a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables, we define its norm `‖f‖` as the
smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`.
We show that it is indeed a norm, and prove its basic properties.
## Main results
Let `f` be a multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `exists_bound_of_continuous` asserts that, if `f` is continuous, then there exists `C > 0`
with `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`.
* `continuous_of_bound`, conversely, asserts that this bound implies continuity.
* `mk_continuous` constructs the associated continuous multilinear map.
Let `f` be a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `‖f‖` is its norm, i.e., the smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for
all `m`.
* `le_op_norm f m` asserts the fundamental inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`.
* `norm_image_sub_le f m₁ m₂` gives a control of the difference `f m₁ - f m₂` in terms of
`‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`.
We also register isomorphisms corresponding to currying or uncurrying variables, transforming a
continuous multilinear function `f` in `n+1` variables into a continuous linear function taking
values in continuous multilinear functions in `n` variables, and also into a continuous multilinear
function in `n` variables taking values in continuous linear functions. These operations are called
`f.curry_left` and `f.curry_right` respectively (with inverses `f.uncurry_left` and
`f.uncurry_right`). They induce continuous linear equivalences between spaces of
continuous multilinear functions in `n+1` variables and spaces of continuous linear functions into
continuous multilinear functions in `n` variables (resp. continuous multilinear functions in `n`
variables taking values in continuous linear functions), called respectively
`continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv` and `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv`.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API (and the proofs) of `operator_norm.lean`, with the additional complexity
that we should deal with multilinear maps in several variables. The currying/uncurrying
constructions are based on those in `multilinear.lean`.
From the mathematical point of view, all the results follow from the results on operator norm in
one variable, by applying them to one variable after the other through currying. However, this
is only well defined when there is an order on the variables (for instance on `fin n`) although
the final result is independent of the order. While everything could be done following this
approach, it turns out that direct proofs are easier and more efficient.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators nnreal
open finset metric
local attribute [instance, priority 1001]
add_comm_group.to_add_comm_monoid normed_add_comm_group.to_add_comm_group normed_space.to_module'
/-!
### Type variables
We use the following type variables in this file:
* `𝕜` : a `nontrivially_normed_field`;
* `ι`, `ι'` : finite index types with decidable equality;
* `E`, `E₁` : families of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : ι`;
* `E'` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i' : ι'`;
* `Ei` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : fin (nat.succ n)`;
* `G`, `G'` : normed vector spaces over `𝕜`.
-/
universes u v v' wE wE₁ wE' wEi wG wG'
variables {𝕜 : Type u} {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {n : ℕ}
{E : ι → Type wE} {E₁ : ι → Type wE₁} {E' : ι' → Type wE'} {Ei : fin n.succ → Type wEi}
{G : Type wG} {G' : Type wG'}
[fintype ι] [fintype ι'] [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜]
[Π i, normed_add_comm_group (E i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (E i)]
[Π i, normed_add_comm_group (E₁ i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (E₁ i)]
[Π i, normed_add_comm_group (E' i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (E' i)]
[Π i, normed_add_comm_group (Ei i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (Ei i)]
[normed_add_comm_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G] [normed_add_comm_group G'] [normed_space 𝕜 G']
/-!
### Continuity properties of multilinear maps
We relate continuity of multilinear maps to the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, in
both directions. Along the way, we prove useful bounds on the difference `‖f m₁ - f m₂‖`.
-/
namespace multilinear_map
variable (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E G)
/-- If a multilinear map in finitely many variables on normed spaces satisfies the inequality
`‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` on a shell `ε i / ‖c i‖ < ‖m i‖ < ε i` for some positive numbers `ε i`
and elements `c i : 𝕜`, `1 < ‖c i‖`, then it satisfies this inequality for all `m`. -/
lemma bound_of_shell {ε : ι → ℝ} {C : ℝ} (hε : ∀ i, 0 < ε i) {c : ι → 𝕜} (hc : ∀ i, 1 < ‖c i‖)
(hf : ∀ m : Π i, E i, (∀ i, ε i / ‖c i‖ ≤ ‖m i‖) → (∀ i, ‖m i‖ < ε i) → ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖)
(m : Π i, E i) : ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
begin
rcases em (∃ i, m i = 0) with ⟨i, hi⟩|hm; [skip, push_neg at hm],
{ simp [f.map_coord_zero i hi, prod_eq_zero (mem_univ i), hi] },
choose δ hδ0 hδm_lt hle_δm hδinv using λ i, rescale_to_shell (hc i) (hε i) (hm i),
have hδ0 : 0 < ∏ i, ‖δ i‖, from prod_pos (λ i _, norm_pos_iff.2 (hδ0 i)),
simpa [map_smul_univ, norm_smul, prod_mul_distrib, mul_left_comm C, mul_le_mul_left hδ0]
using hf (λ i, δ i • m i) hle_δm hδm_lt,
end
/-- If a multilinear map in finitely many variables on normed spaces is continuous, then it
satisfies the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, for some `C` which can be chosen to be
positive. -/
theorem exists_bound_of_continuous (hf : continuous f) :
∃ (C : ℝ), 0 < C ∧ (∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty ι,
{ refine ⟨‖f 0‖ + 1, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one, λ m, _⟩,
obtain rfl : m = 0, from funext (is_empty.elim ‹_›),
simp [univ_eq_empty, zero_le_one] },
obtain ⟨ε : ℝ, ε0 : 0 < ε, hε : ∀ m : Π i, E i, ‖m - 0‖ < ε → ‖f m - f 0‖ < 1⟩ :=
normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds.1 (hf.tendsto 0) 1 zero_lt_one,
simp only [sub_zero, f.map_zero] at hε,
rcases normed_field.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩,
have : 0 < (‖c‖ / ε) ^ fintype.card ι, from pow_pos (div_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hc) ε0) _,
refine ⟨_, this, _⟩,
refine f.bound_of_shell (λ _, ε0) (λ _, hc) (λ m hcm hm, _),
refine (hε m ((pi_norm_lt_iff ε0).2 hm)).le.trans _,
rw [← div_le_iff' this, one_div, ← inv_pow, inv_div, fintype.card, ← prod_const],
exact prod_le_prod (λ _ _, div_nonneg ε0.le (norm_nonneg _)) (λ i _, hcm i)
end
/-- If `f` satisfies a boundedness property around `0`, one can deduce a bound on `f m₁ - f m₂`
using the multilinearity. Here, we give a precise but hard to use version. See
`norm_image_sub_le_of_bound` for a less precise but more usable version. The bound reads
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤
C * ‖m 1 - m' 1‖ * max ‖m 2‖ ‖m' 2‖ * max ‖m 3‖ ‖m' 3‖ * ... * max ‖m n‖ ‖m' n‖ + ...`,
where the other terms in the sum are the same products where `1` is replaced by any `i`. -/
lemma norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' [decidable_eq ι] {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) (m₁ m₂ : Πi, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤
C * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :=
begin
have A : ∀(s : finset ι), ‖f m₁ - f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁)‖
≤ C * ∑ i in s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖,
{ refine finset.induction (by simp) _,
assume i s his Hrec,
have I : ‖f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖
≤ C * ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖,
{ have A : ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)
= function.update (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) i (m₂ i) := s.piecewise_insert _ _ _,
have B : s.piecewise m₂ m₁ = function.update (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) i (m₁ i),
{ ext j,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp [his] },
{ simp [h] } },
rw [B, A, ← f.map_sub],
apply le_trans (H _) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ hC),
refine prod_le_prod (λj hj, norm_nonneg _) (λj hj, _),
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp },
{ by_cases h' : j ∈ s;
simp [h', h, le_refl] } },
calc ‖f m₁ - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ ≤
‖f m₁ - f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ + ‖f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ :
by { rw [← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm], exact dist_triangle _ _ _ }
... ≤ (C * ∑ i in s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖)
+ C * ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :
add_le_add Hrec I
... = C * ∑ i in insert i s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :
by simp [his, add_comm, left_distrib] },
convert A univ,
simp
end
/-- If `f` satisfies a boundedness property around `0`, one can deduce a bound on `f m₁ - f m₂`
using the multilinearity. Here, we give a usable but not very precise version. See
`norm_image_sub_le_of_bound'` for a more precise but less usable version. The bound is
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤ C * card ι * ‖m - m'‖ * (max ‖m‖ ‖m'‖) ^ (card ι - 1)`. -/
lemma norm_image_sub_le_of_bound {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) (m₁ m₂ : Πi, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ C * (fintype.card ι) * (max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ :=
begin
letI := classical.dec_eq ι,
have A : ∀ (i : ι), ∏ j, (if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖)
≤ ‖m₁ - m₂‖ * (max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1),
{ assume i,
calc ∏ j, (if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖)
≤ ∏ j : ι, function.update (λ j, max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) i (‖m₁ - m₂‖) j :
begin
apply prod_le_prod,
{ assume j hj, by_cases h : j = i; simp [h, norm_nonneg] },
{ assume j hj,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp, exact norm_le_pi_norm (m₁ - m₂) i },
{ simp [h, max_le_max, norm_le_pi_norm (_ : Π i, E i)] } }
end
... = ‖m₁ - m₂‖ * (max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) :
by { rw prod_update_of_mem (finset.mem_univ _), simp [card_univ_diff] } },
calc
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖
≤ C * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :
f.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' hC H m₁ m₂
... ≤ C * ∑ i, ‖m₁ - m₂‖ * (max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sum_le_sum (λi hi, A i)) hC
... = C * (fintype.card ι) * (max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ :
by { rw [sum_const, card_univ, nsmul_eq_mul], ring }
end
/-- If a multilinear map satisfies an inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, then it is
continuous. -/
theorem continuous_of_bound (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
continuous f :=
begin
let D := max C 1,
have D_pos : 0 ≤ D := le_trans zero_le_one (le_max_right _ _),
replace H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ D * ∏ i, ‖m i‖,
{ assume m,
apply le_trans (H m) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) _),
exact prod_nonneg (λ(i : ι) hi, norm_nonneg (m i)) },
refine continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 (λm, _),
refine continuous_at_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one
(D * (fintype.card ι) * (‖m‖ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1)) (λm' h', _),
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm],
have : 0 ≤ (max ‖m'‖ ‖m‖), by simp,
have : (max ‖m'‖ ‖m‖) ≤ ‖m‖ + 1,
by simp [zero_le_one, norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball (le_of_lt h'), -add_comm],
calc
‖f m' - f m‖
≤ D * (fintype.card ι) * (max ‖m'‖ ‖m‖) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m' - m‖ :
f.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound D_pos H m' m
... ≤ D * (fintype.card ι) * (‖m‖ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m' - m‖ :
by apply_rules [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left, mul_nonneg,
norm_nonneg, nat.cast_nonneg, pow_le_pow_of_le_left]
end
/-- Constructing a continuous multilinear map from a multilinear map satisfying a boundedness
condition. -/
def mk_continuous (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G :=
{ cont := f.continuous_of_bound C H, ..f }
@[simp] lemma coe_mk_continuous (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
⇑(f.mk_continuous C H) = f :=
rfl
/-- Given a multilinear map in `n` variables, if one restricts it to `k` variables putting `z` on
the other coordinates, then the resulting restricted function satisfies an inequality
`‖f.restr v‖ ≤ C * ‖z‖^(n-k) * Π ‖v i‖` if the original function satisfies `‖f v‖ ≤ C * Π ‖v i‖`. -/
lemma restr_norm_le {k n : ℕ} (f : (multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, G) G' : _))
(s : finset (fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) {C : ℝ}
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) (v : fin k → G) :
‖f.restr s hk z v‖ ≤ C * ‖z‖ ^ (n - k) * ∏ i, ‖v i‖ :=
begin
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc],
convert H _ using 2,
simp only [apply_dite norm, fintype.prod_dite, prod_const (‖z‖), finset.card_univ,
fintype.card_of_subtype sᶜ (λ x, mem_compl), card_compl, fintype.card_fin, hk, mk_coe,
← (s.order_iso_of_fin hk).symm.bijective.prod_comp (λ x, ‖v x‖)],
refl
end
end multilinear_map
/-!
### Continuous multilinear maps
We define the norm `‖f‖` of a continuous multilinear map `f` in finitely many variables as the
smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`. We show that this
defines a normed space structure on `continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G`.
-/
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
variables (c : 𝕜) (f g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) (m : Πi, E i)
theorem bound : ∃ (C : ℝ), 0 < C ∧ (∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.exists_bound_of_continuous f.2
open real
/-- The operator norm of a continuous multilinear map is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def op_norm := Inf {c | 0 ≤ (c : ℝ) ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖}
instance has_op_norm : has_norm (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) := ⟨op_norm⟩
/-- An alias of `continuous_multilinear_map.has_op_norm` with non-dependent types to help typeclass
search. -/
instance has_op_norm' : has_norm (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : ι), G) G') :=
continuous_multilinear_map.has_op_norm
lemma norm_def : ‖f‖ = Inf {c | 0 ≤ (c : ℝ) ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖} := rfl
-- So that invocations of `le_cInf` make sense: we show that the set of
-- bounds is nonempty and bounded below.
lemma bounds_nonempty {f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G} :
∃ c, c ∈ {c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖} :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.bound in ⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
lemma bounds_bdd_below {f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G} :
bdd_below {c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖} :=
⟨0, λ _ ⟨hn, _⟩, hn⟩
lemma op_norm_nonneg : 0 ≤ ‖f‖ :=
le_cInf bounds_nonempty (λ _ ⟨hx, _⟩, hx)
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm of a continuous multilinear map:
`‖f m‖` is bounded by `‖f‖` times the product of the `‖m i‖`. -/
theorem le_op_norm : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
begin
have A : 0 ≤ ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := prod_nonneg (λj hj, norm_nonneg _),
cases A.eq_or_lt with h hlt,
{ rcases prod_eq_zero_iff.1 h.symm with ⟨i, _, hi⟩,
rw norm_eq_zero at hi,
have : f m = 0 := f.map_coord_zero i hi,
rw [this, norm_zero],
exact mul_nonneg (op_norm_nonneg f) A },
{ rw [← div_le_iff hlt],
apply le_cInf bounds_nonempty,
rintro c ⟨_, hc⟩, rw [div_le_iff hlt], apply hc }
end
theorem le_of_op_norm_le {C : ℝ} (h : ‖f‖ ≤ C) : ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
(f.le_op_norm m).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (prod_nonneg $ λ i _, norm_nonneg (m i))
lemma ratio_le_op_norm : ‖f m‖ / ∏ i, ‖m i‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (prod_nonneg $ λ i _, norm_nonneg _) (op_norm_nonneg _) (f.le_op_norm m)
/-- The image of the unit ball under a continuous multilinear map is bounded. -/
lemma unit_le_op_norm (h : ‖m‖ ≤ 1) : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ : f.le_op_norm m
... ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i : ι, 1 :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (prod_le_prod (λi hi, norm_nonneg _)
(λi hi, le_trans (norm_le_pi_norm (_ : Π i, E i) _) h)) (op_norm_nonneg f)
... = ‖f‖ : by simp
/-- If one controls the norm of every `f x`, then one controls the norm of `f`. -/
lemma op_norm_le_bound {M : ℝ} (hMp: 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ M * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
‖f‖ ≤ M :=
cInf_le bounds_bdd_below ⟨hMp, hM⟩
/-- The operator norm satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem op_norm_add_le : ‖f + g‖ ≤ ‖f‖ + ‖g‖ :=
cInf_le bounds_bdd_below
⟨add_nonneg (op_norm_nonneg _) (op_norm_nonneg _), λ x, by { rw add_mul,
exact norm_add_le_of_le (le_op_norm _ _) (le_op_norm _ _) }⟩
lemma op_norm_zero : ‖(0 : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G)‖ = 0 :=
(op_norm_nonneg _).antisymm' $ op_norm_le_bound 0 le_rfl $ λ m, by simp
/-- A continuous linear map is zero iff its norm vanishes. -/
theorem op_norm_zero_iff : ‖f‖ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
⟨λ h, by { ext m, simpa [h] using f.le_op_norm m }, by { rintro rfl, exact op_norm_zero }⟩
section
variables {𝕜' : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_space 𝕜' G] [smul_comm_class 𝕜 𝕜' G]
lemma op_norm_smul_le (c : 𝕜') : ‖c • f‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * ‖f‖ :=
(c • f).op_norm_le_bound
(mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (op_norm_nonneg _))
begin
intro m,
erw [norm_smul, mul_assoc],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_op_norm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
end
lemma op_norm_neg : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ := by { rw norm_def, apply congr_arg, ext, simp }
/-- Continuous multilinear maps themselves form a normed space with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance normed_add_comm_group : normed_add_comm_group (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :=
add_group_norm.to_normed_add_comm_group
{ to_fun := norm,
map_zero' := op_norm_zero,
neg' := op_norm_neg,
add_le' := op_norm_add_le,
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := λ f, f.op_norm_zero_iff.1 }
/-- An alias of `continuous_multilinear_map.normed_add_comm_group` with non-dependent types to help
typeclass search. -/
instance normed_add_comm_group' :
normed_add_comm_group (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : ι, G) G') :=
continuous_multilinear_map.normed_add_comm_group
instance normed_space : normed_space 𝕜' (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :=
⟨λ c f, f.op_norm_smul_le c⟩
/-- An alias of `continuous_multilinear_map.normed_space` with non-dependent types to help typeclass
search. -/
instance normed_space' : normed_space 𝕜' (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : ι, G') G) :=
continuous_multilinear_map.normed_space
theorem le_op_norm_mul_prod_of_le {b : ι → ℝ} (hm : ∀ i, ‖m i‖ ≤ b i) : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, b i :=
(f.le_op_norm m).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(prod_le_prod (λ _ _, norm_nonneg _) (λ i _, hm i)) (norm_nonneg f)
theorem le_op_norm_mul_pow_card_of_le {b : ℝ} (hm : ∀ i, ‖m i‖ ≤ b) :
‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * b ^ fintype.card ι :=
by simpa only [prod_const] using f.le_op_norm_mul_prod_of_le m hm
theorem le_op_norm_mul_pow_of_le {Ei : fin n → Type*} [Π i, normed_add_comm_group (Ei i)]
[Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (Ei i)] (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (m : Π i, Ei i)
{b : ℝ} (hm : ‖m‖ ≤ b) :
‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * b ^ n :=
by simpa only [fintype.card_fin]
using f.le_op_norm_mul_pow_card_of_le m (λ i, (norm_le_pi_norm m i).trans hm)
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm of a continuous multilinear map:
`‖f m‖` is bounded by `‖f‖` times the product of the `‖m i‖`, `nnnorm` version. -/
theorem le_op_nnnorm : ‖f m‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ by { push_cast, exact f.le_op_norm m }
theorem le_of_op_nnnorm_le {C : ℝ≥0} (h : ‖f‖₊ ≤ C) : ‖f m‖₊ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊ :=
(f.le_op_nnnorm m).trans $ mul_le_mul' h le_rfl
lemma op_norm_prod (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) (g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') :
‖f.prod g‖ = max (‖f‖) (‖g‖) :=
le_antisymm
(op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg (f, g)) (λ m,
have H : 0 ≤ ∏ i, ‖m i‖, from prod_nonneg $ λ _ _, norm_nonneg _,
by simpa only [prod_apply, prod.norm_def, max_mul_of_nonneg, H]
using max_le_max (f.le_op_norm m) (g.le_op_norm m))) $
max_le
(f.op_norm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) $ λ m, (le_max_left _ _).trans ((f.prod g).le_op_norm _))
(g.op_norm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) $ λ m, (le_max_right _ _).trans ((f.prod g).le_op_norm _))
lemma norm_pi {ι' : Type v'} [fintype ι'] {E' : ι' → Type wE'} [Π i', normed_add_comm_group (E' i')]
[Π i', normed_space 𝕜 (E' i')] (f : Π i', continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (E' i')) :
‖pi f‖ = ‖f‖ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine (op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg f) (λ m, _)),
dsimp,
rw pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg,
exacts [λ i, (f i).le_of_op_norm_le m (norm_le_pi_norm f i),
mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg f) (prod_nonneg $ λ _ _, norm_nonneg _)] },
{ refine (pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)).2 (λ i, _),
refine (op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λ m, _)),
refine le_trans _ ((pi f).le_op_norm m),
convert norm_le_pi_norm (λ j, f j m) i }
end
section
variables (𝕜 G)
lemma norm_of_subsingleton_le [subsingleton ι] (i' : ι) : ‖of_subsingleton 𝕜 G i'‖ ≤ 1 :=
op_norm_le_bound _ zero_le_one $ λ m,
by rw [fintype.prod_subsingleton _ i', one_mul, of_subsingleton_apply]
@[simp] lemma norm_of_subsingleton [subsingleton ι] [nontrivial G] (i' : ι) :
‖of_subsingleton 𝕜 G i'‖ = 1 :=
begin
apply le_antisymm (norm_of_subsingleton_le 𝕜 G i'),
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_ne (0 : G),
rw ←norm_ne_zero_iff at hg,
have := (of_subsingleton 𝕜 G i').ratio_le_op_norm (λ _, g),
rwa [fintype.prod_subsingleton _ i', of_subsingleton_apply, div_self hg] at this,
end
lemma nnnorm_of_subsingleton_le [subsingleton ι] (i' : ι) : ‖of_subsingleton 𝕜 G i'‖₊ ≤ 1 :=
norm_of_subsingleton_le _ _ _
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_of_subsingleton [subsingleton ι] [nontrivial G] (i' : ι) :
‖of_subsingleton 𝕜 G i'‖₊ = 1 :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_of_subsingleton _ _ _
variables {G} (E)
@[simp] lemma norm_const_of_is_empty [is_empty ι] (x : G) : ‖const_of_is_empty 𝕜 E x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λ x, _),
rw [fintype.prod_empty, mul_one, const_of_is_empty_apply], },
{ simpa using (const_of_is_empty 𝕜 E x).le_op_norm 0 }
end
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_const_of_is_empty [is_empty ι] (x : G) : ‖const_of_is_empty 𝕜 E x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_const_of_is_empty _ _ _
end
section
variables (𝕜 E E' G G')
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.prod` as a `linear_isometry_equiv`. -/
def prodL :
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) × (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (G × G') :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f.1.prod f.2,
inv_fun := λ f, ((continuous_linear_map.fst 𝕜 G G').comp_continuous_multilinear_map f,
(continuous_linear_map.snd 𝕜 G G').comp_continuous_multilinear_map f),
map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl,
left_inv := λ f, by ext; refl,
right_inv := λ f, by ext; refl,
norm_map' := λ f, op_norm_prod f.1 f.2 }
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.pi` as a `linear_isometry_equiv`. -/
def piₗᵢ {ι' : Type v'} [fintype ι'] {E' : ι' → Type wE'} [Π i', normed_add_comm_group (E' i')]
[Π i', normed_space 𝕜 (E' i')] :
@linear_isometry_equiv 𝕜 𝕜 _ _ (ring_hom.id 𝕜) _ _ _
(Π i', continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (E' i')) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (Π i, E' i)) _ _
(@pi.module ι' _ 𝕜 _ _ (λ i', infer_instance)) _ :=
{ to_linear_equiv :=
-- note: `pi_linear_equiv` does not unify correctly here, presumably due to issues with dependent
-- typeclass arguments.
{ map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl,
.. pi_equiv, },
norm_map' := norm_pi }
end
end
section restrict_scalars
variables {𝕜' : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜' 𝕜]
variables [normed_space 𝕜' G] [is_scalar_tower 𝕜' 𝕜 G]
variables [Π i, normed_space 𝕜' (E i)] [∀ i, is_scalar_tower 𝕜' 𝕜 (E i)]
@[simp] lemma norm_restrict_scalars : ‖f.restrict_scalars 𝕜'‖ = ‖f‖ := rfl
variable (𝕜')
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.restrict_scalars` as a `linear_isometry`. -/
def restrict_scalarsₗᵢ :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G →ₗᵢ[𝕜'] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜' E G :=
{ to_fun := restrict_scalars 𝕜',
map_add' := λ m₁ m₂, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c m, rfl,
norm_map' := λ f, rfl }
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.restrict_scalars` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def restrict_scalars_linear :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜'] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜' E G :=
(restrict_scalarsₗᵢ 𝕜').to_continuous_linear_map
variable {𝕜'}
lemma continuous_restrict_scalars :
continuous (restrict_scalars 𝕜' : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G →
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜' E G) :=
(restrict_scalars_linear 𝕜').continuous
end restrict_scalars
/-- The difference `f m₁ - f m₂` is controlled in terms of `‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`, precise version.
For a less precise but more usable version, see `norm_image_sub_le`. The bound reads
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤
‖f‖ * ‖m 1 - m' 1‖ * max ‖m 2‖ ‖m' 2‖ * max ‖m 3‖ ‖m' 3‖ * ... * max ‖m n‖ ‖m' n‖ + ...`,
where the other terms in the sum are the same products where `1` is replaced by any `i`.-/
lemma norm_image_sub_le' [decidable_eq ι] (m₁ m₂ : Πi, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤
‖f‖ * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :=
f.to_multilinear_map.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' (norm_nonneg _) f.le_op_norm _ _
/-- The difference `f m₁ - f m₂` is controlled in terms of `‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`, less precise
version. For a more precise but less usable version, see `norm_image_sub_le'`.
The bound is `‖f m - f m'‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * card ι * ‖m - m'‖ * (max ‖m‖ ‖m'‖) ^ (card ι - 1)`.-/
lemma norm_image_sub_le (m₁ m₂ : Πi, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * (fintype.card ι) * (max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ :=
f.to_multilinear_map.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound (norm_nonneg _) f.le_op_norm _ _
/-- Applying a multilinear map to a vector is continuous in both coordinates. -/
lemma continuous_eval :
continuous (λ p : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G × Π i, E i, p.1 p.2) :=
begin
apply continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 (λp, _),
apply continuous_at_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one
((‖p‖ + 1) * (fintype.card ι) * (‖p‖ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) + ∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖)
(λq hq, _),
have : 0 ≤ (max ‖q.2‖ ‖p.2‖), by simp,
have : 0 ≤ ‖p‖ + 1 := zero_le_one.trans ((le_add_iff_nonneg_left 1).2 $ norm_nonneg p),
have A : ‖q‖ ≤ ‖p‖ + 1 := norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball hq.le,
have : (max ‖q.2‖ ‖p.2‖) ≤ ‖p‖ + 1 :=
(max_le_max (norm_snd_le q) (norm_snd_le p)).trans (by simp [A, -add_comm, zero_le_one]),
have : ∀ (i : ι), i ∈ univ → 0 ≤ ‖p.2 i‖ := λ i hi, norm_nonneg _,
calc dist (q.1 q.2) (p.1 p.2)
≤ dist (q.1 q.2) (q.1 p.2) + dist (q.1 p.2) (p.1 p.2) : dist_triangle _ _ _
... = ‖q.1 q.2 - q.1 p.2‖ + ‖q.1 p.2 - p.1 p.2‖ : by rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm]
... ≤ ‖q.1‖ * (fintype.card ι) * (max ‖q.2‖ ‖p.2‖) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖q.2 - p.2‖
+ ‖q.1 - p.1‖ * ∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖ :
add_le_add (norm_image_sub_le _ _ _) ((q.1 - p.1).le_op_norm p.2)
... ≤ (‖p‖ + 1) * (fintype.card ι) * (‖p‖ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖q - p‖
+ ‖q - p‖ * ∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖ :
by apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul, le_refl, le_trans (norm_fst_le q) A, nat.cast_nonneg,
mul_nonneg, pow_le_pow_of_le_left, pow_nonneg, norm_snd_le (q - p), norm_nonneg,
norm_fst_le (q - p), prod_nonneg]
... = ((‖p‖ + 1) * (fintype.card ι) * (‖p‖ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1)
+ (∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖)) * dist q p : by { rw dist_eq_norm, ring }
end
lemma continuous_eval_left (m : Π i, E i) :
continuous (λ p : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G, p m) :=
continuous_eval.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
lemma has_sum_eval
{α : Type*} {p : α → continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G} {q : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G}
(h : has_sum p q) (m : Π i, E i) : has_sum (λ a, p a m) (q m) :=
begin
dsimp [has_sum] at h ⊢,
convert ((continuous_eval_left m).tendsto _).comp h,
ext s,
simp
end
lemma tsum_eval {α : Type*} {p : α → continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G} (hp : summable p)
(m : Π i, E i) : (∑' a, p a) m = ∑' a, p a m :=
(has_sum_eval hp.has_sum m).tsum_eq.symm
open_locale topology
open filter
/-- If the target space is complete, the space of continuous multilinear maps with its norm is also
complete. The proof is essentially the same as for the space of continuous linear maps (modulo the
addition of `finset.prod` where needed. The duplication could be avoided by deducing the linear
case from the multilinear case via a currying isomorphism. However, this would mess up imports,
and it is more satisfactory to have the simplest case as a standalone proof. -/
instance [complete_space G] : complete_space (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :=
begin
have nonneg : ∀ (v : Π i, E i), 0 ≤ ∏ i, ‖v i‖ :=
λ v, finset.prod_nonneg (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _),
-- We show that every Cauchy sequence converges.
refine metric.complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto (λ f hf, _),
-- We now expand out the definition of a Cauchy sequence,
rcases cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0.1 hf with ⟨b, b0, b_bound, b_lim⟩,
-- and establish that the evaluation at any point `v : Π i, E i` is Cauchy.
have cau : ∀ v, cauchy_seq (λ n, f n v),
{ assume v,
apply cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0.2 ⟨λ n, b n * ∏ i, ‖v i‖, λ n, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact mul_nonneg (b0 n) (nonneg v) },
{ assume n m N hn hm,
rw dist_eq_norm,
apply le_trans ((f n - f m).le_op_norm v) _,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (b_bound n m N hn hm) (nonneg v) },
{ simpa using b_lim.mul tendsto_const_nhds } },
-- We assemble the limits points of those Cauchy sequences
-- (which exist as `G` is complete)
-- into a function which we call `F`.
choose F hF using λv, cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete (cau v),
-- Next, we show that this `F` is multilinear,
let Fmult : multilinear_map 𝕜 E G :=
{ to_fun := F,
map_add' := λ _ v i x y, begin
resetI,
have A := hF (function.update v i (x + y)),
have B := (hF (function.update v i x)).add (hF (function.update v i y)),
simp at A B,
exact tendsto_nhds_unique A B
end,
map_smul' := λ _ v i c x, begin
resetI,
have A := hF (function.update v i (c • x)),
have B := filter.tendsto.smul (@tendsto_const_nhds _ ℕ _ c _) (hF (function.update v i x)),
simp at A B,
exact tendsto_nhds_unique A B
end },
-- and that `F` has norm at most `(b 0 + ‖f 0‖)`.
have Fnorm : ∀ v, ‖F v‖ ≤ (b 0 + ‖f 0‖) * ∏ i, ‖v i‖,
{ assume v,
have A : ∀ n, ‖f n v‖ ≤ (b 0 + ‖f 0‖) * ∏ i, ‖v i‖,
{ assume n,
apply le_trans ((f n).le_op_norm _) _,
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (nonneg v),
calc ‖f n‖ = ‖(f n - f 0) + f 0‖ : by { congr' 1, abel }
... ≤ ‖f n - f 0‖ + ‖f 0‖ : norm_add_le _ _
... ≤ b 0 + ‖f 0‖ : begin
apply add_le_add_right,
simpa [dist_eq_norm] using b_bound n 0 0 (zero_le _) (zero_le _)
end },
exact le_of_tendsto (hF v).norm (eventually_of_forall A) },
-- Thus `F` is continuous, and we propose that as the limit point of our original Cauchy sequence.
let Fcont := Fmult.mk_continuous _ Fnorm,
use Fcont,
-- Our last task is to establish convergence to `F` in norm.
have : ∀ n, ‖f n - Fcont‖ ≤ b n,
{ assume n,
apply op_norm_le_bound _ (b0 n) (λ v, _),
have A : ∀ᶠ m in at_top, ‖(f n - f m) v‖ ≤ b n * ∏ i, ‖v i‖,
{ refine eventually_at_top.2 ⟨n, λ m hm, _⟩,
apply le_trans ((f n - f m).le_op_norm _) _,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (b_bound n m n le_rfl hm) (nonneg v) },
have B : tendsto (λ m, ‖(f n - f m) v‖) at_top (𝓝 (‖(f n - Fcont) v‖)) :=
tendsto.norm (tendsto_const_nhds.sub (hF v)),
exact le_of_tendsto B A },
erw tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
exact squeeze_zero (λ n, norm_nonneg _) this b_lim,
end
end continuous_multilinear_map
/-- If a continuous multilinear map is constructed from a multilinear map via the constructor
`mk_continuous`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor if it is
nonnegative. -/
lemma multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖f.mk_continuous C H‖ ≤ C :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ hC (λm, H m)
/-- If a continuous multilinear map is constructed from a multilinear map via the constructor
`mk_continuous`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor if it is
nonnegative. -/
lemma multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le' (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ}
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖f.mk_continuous C H‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) $
λ m, (H m).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _)
(prod_nonneg $ λ _ _, norm_nonneg _)
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `fin n`) and a subset
`s` of `k` of these variables, one gets a new continuous multilinear map on `fin k` by varying
these variables, and fixing the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by
`f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit
identification between `fin k` and `s` that we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : (G [×n]→L[𝕜] G' : _)) (s : finset (fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) :
G [×k]→L[𝕜] G' :=
(f.to_multilinear_map.restr s hk z).mk_continuous
(‖f‖ * ‖z‖^(n-k)) $ λ v, multilinear_map.restr_norm_le _ _ _ _ f.le_op_norm _
lemma norm_restr {k n : ℕ} (f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') (s : finset (fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) :
‖f.restr s hk z‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖z‖ ^ (n - k) :=
begin
apply multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le,
exact mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
end
section
variables {𝕜 ι} {A : Type*} [normed_comm_ring A] [normed_algebra 𝕜 A]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_le [nonempty ι] :
‖continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A‖ ≤ 1 :=
begin
have := λ f, @op_norm_le_bound 𝕜 ι (λ i, A) A _ _ _ _ _ _ f _ zero_le_one,
refine this _ _,
intros m,
simp only [continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_apply, one_mul],
exact norm_prod_le' _ univ_nonempty _,
end
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_of_empty [is_empty ι] :
‖continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A‖ = ‖(1 : A)‖ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ have := λ f, @op_norm_le_bound 𝕜 ι (λ i, A) A _ _ _ _ _ _ f _ (norm_nonneg (1 : A)),
refine this _ _,
simp, },
{ convert ratio_le_op_norm _ (λ _, (1 : A)),
simp [eq_empty_of_is_empty (univ : finset ι)], },
end
@[simp] lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra [norm_one_class A] :
‖continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A‖ = 1 :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty ι,
{ simp [norm_mk_pi_algebra_of_empty] },
{ refine le_antisymm norm_mk_pi_algebra_le _,
convert ratio_le_op_norm _ (λ _, 1); [skip, apply_instance],
simp },
end
end
section
variables {𝕜 n} {A : Type*} [normed_ring A] [normed_algebra 𝕜 A]
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_succ_le :
‖continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 n.succ A‖ ≤ 1 :=
begin
have := λ f, @op_norm_le_bound 𝕜 (fin n.succ) (λ i, A) A _ _ _ _ _ _ f _ zero_le_one,
refine this _ _,
intros m,
simp only [continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin_apply, one_mul, list.of_fn_eq_map,
fin.prod_univ_def, multiset.coe_map, multiset.coe_prod],
refine (list.norm_prod_le' _).trans_eq _,
{ rw [ne.def, list.map_eq_nil, list.fin_range_eq_nil],
exact nat.succ_ne_zero _, },
rw list.map_map,
end
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_le_of_pos (hn : 0 < n) :
‖continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 n A‖ ≤ 1 :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne',
exact norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_succ_le
end
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_zero :
‖continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 0 A‖ = ‖(1 : A)‖ :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ have := λ f, @op_norm_le_bound 𝕜 (fin 0) (λ i, A) A _ _ _ _ _ _ f _ (norm_nonneg (1 : A)),
refine this _ _,
simp, },
{ convert ratio_le_op_norm _ (λ _, (1 : A)),
simp }
end
@[simp] lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin [norm_one_class A] :
‖continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 n A‖ = 1 :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp [norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_zero] },
{ refine le_antisymm norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_succ_le _,
convert ratio_le_op_norm _ (λ _, 1); [skip, apply_instance],
simp }
end
end
variables (𝕜 ι)
/-- The canonical continuous multilinear map on `𝕜^ι`, associating to `m` the product of all the
`m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module) -/
protected def mk_pi_field (z : G) : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : ι), 𝕜) G :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous
(multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring 𝕜 ι z) (‖z‖)
(λ m, by simp only [multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring_apply, norm_smul, norm_prod,
mul_comm])
variables {𝕜 ι}
@[simp] lemma mk_pi_field_apply (z : G) (m : ι → 𝕜) :
(continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z : (ι → 𝕜) → G) m = (∏ i, m i) • z := rfl
lemma mk_pi_field_apply_one_eq_self (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : ι), 𝕜) G) :
continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι (f (λi, 1)) = f :=
to_multilinear_map_injective f.to_multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring_apply_one_eq_self
@[simp] lemma norm_mk_pi_field (z : G) : ‖continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z‖ = ‖z‖ :=
(multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg z) _).antisymm $
by simpa using (continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z).le_op_norm (λ _, 1)
lemma mk_pi_field_eq_iff {z₁ z₂ : G} :
continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z₁ = continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z₂ ↔
z₁ = z₂ :=
begin
rw [← to_multilinear_map_injective.eq_iff],
exact multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring_eq_iff
end
lemma mk_pi_field_zero :
continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι (0 : G) = 0 :=
by ext; rw [mk_pi_field_apply, smul_zero, continuous_multilinear_map.zero_apply]
lemma mk_pi_field_eq_zero_iff (z : G) :
continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
by rw [← mk_pi_field_zero, mk_pi_field_eq_iff]
variables (𝕜 ι G)
/-- Continuous multilinear maps on `𝕜^n` with values in `G` are in bijection with `G`, as such a
continuous multilinear map is completely determined by its value on the constant vector made of
ones. We register this bijection as a linear isometry in
`continuous_multilinear_map.pi_field_equiv`. -/
protected def pi_field_equiv : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : ι), 𝕜) G) :=
{ to_fun := λ z, continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z,
inv_fun := λ f, f (λi, 1),
map_add' := λ z z', by { ext m, simp [smul_add] },
map_smul' := λ c z, by { ext m, simp [smul_smul, mul_comm] },
left_inv := λ z, by simp,
right_inv := λ f, f.mk_pi_field_apply_one_eq_self,
norm_map' := norm_mk_pi_field }
end continuous_multilinear_map
namespace continuous_linear_map
lemma norm_comp_continuous_multilinear_map_le (g : G →L[𝕜] G')
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :
‖g.comp_continuous_multilinear_map f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ‖f‖ :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) $ λ m,
calc ‖g (f m)‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : g.le_op_norm_of_le $ f.le_op_norm _
... = _ : (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
variables (𝕜 E G G')
/-- `continuous_linear_map.comp_continuous_multilinear_map` as a bundled continuous bilinear map. -/
def comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL :
(G →L[𝕜] G') →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G' :=
linear_map.mk_continuous₂
(linear_map.mk₂ 𝕜 comp_continuous_multilinear_map (λ f₁ f₂ g, rfl) (λ c f g, rfl)
(λ f g₁ g₂, by { ext1, apply f.map_add }) (λ c f g, by { ext1, simp }))
1 $ λ f g, by { rw one_mul, exact f.norm_comp_continuous_multilinear_map_le g }
variables {𝕜 G G'}
/-- `continuous_linear_map.comp_continuous_multilinear_map` as a bundled
continuous linear equiv. -/
def _root_.continuous_linear_equiv.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL (g : G ≃L[𝕜] G') :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G ≃L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G' :=
{ inv_fun := comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL 𝕜 _ _ _ g.symm.to_continuous_linear_map,
left_inv := begin
assume f,
ext1 m,
simp only [comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_def_rev,
to_linear_map_eq_coe, linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, coe_coe, linear_map.mk_continuous₂_apply,
linear_map.mk₂_apply, comp_continuous_multilinear_map_coe, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_coe,
function.comp_app, continuous_linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply],
end,
right_inv := begin
assume f,
ext1 m,
simp only [comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_def_rev,
to_linear_map_eq_coe, linear_map.mk_continuous₂_apply, linear_map.mk₂_apply,
linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, coe_coe, comp_continuous_multilinear_map_coe,
continuous_linear_equiv.coe_coe, function.comp_app, continuous_linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply],
end,
continuous_to_fun :=
(comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL 𝕜 _ _ _ g.to_continuous_linear_map).continuous,
continuous_inv_fun :=
(comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL 𝕜 _ _ _ g.symm.to_continuous_linear_map).continuous,
.. comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL 𝕜 _ _ _ g.to_continuous_linear_map }
@[simp] lemma _root_.continuous_linear_equiv.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL_symm
(g : G ≃L[𝕜] G') :
(g.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL E).symm = g.symm.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL E := rfl
variables {E}
@[simp] lemma _root_.continuous_linear_equiv.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL_apply
(g : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :
g.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL E f = (g : G →L[𝕜] G').comp_continuous_multilinear_map f :=
rfl
/-- Flip arguments in `f : G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G'` to get
`continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (G →L[𝕜] G')` -/
@[simps apply_apply]
def flip_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (G →L[𝕜] G') :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ m, linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ x, f x m,
map_add' := λ x y, by simp only [map_add, continuous_multilinear_map.add_apply],
map_smul' := λ c x, by simp only [continuous_multilinear_map.smul_apply, map_smul,
ring_hom.id_apply] }
(‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) $ λ x,
by { rw mul_right_comm, exact (f x).le_of_op_norm_le _ (f.le_op_norm x) },
map_add' := λ _ m i x y,
by { ext1, simp only [add_apply, continuous_multilinear_map.map_add, linear_map.coe_mk,
linear_map.mk_continuous_apply]},
map_smul' := λ _ m i c x,
by { ext1, simp only [coe_smul', continuous_multilinear_map.map_smul, linear_map.coe_mk,
linear_map.mk_continuous_apply, pi.smul_apply]} }
‖f‖ $ λ m,
linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _
(mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg f) (prod_nonneg $ λ i hi, norm_nonneg (m i))) _
end continuous_linear_map
lemma linear_isometry.norm_comp_continuous_multilinear_map
(g : G →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G') (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :
‖g.to_continuous_linear_map.comp_continuous_multilinear_map f‖ = ‖f‖ :=
by simp only [continuous_linear_map.comp_continuous_multilinear_map_coe,
linear_isometry.coe_to_continuous_linear_map, linear_isometry.norm_map,
continuous_multilinear_map.norm_def]
open continuous_multilinear_map
namespace multilinear_map
/-- Given a map `f : G →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E G'` and an estimate
`H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, construct a continuous linear
map from `G` to `continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G'`.
In order to lift, e.g., a map `f : (multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G'`
to a map `(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G'`,
one can apply this construction to `f.comp continuous_multilinear_map.to_multilinear_map_linear`
which is a linear map from `continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G` to `multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G'`. -/
def mk_continuous_linear (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G' :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ x, (f x).mk_continuous (C * ‖x‖) $ H x,
map_add' := λ x y, by { ext1, simp only [_root_.map_add], refl },
map_smul' := λ c x, by { ext1, simp only [smul_hom_class.map_smul], refl } }
(max C 0) $ λ x, ((f x).mk_continuous_norm_le' _).trans_eq $
by rw [max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ (norm_nonneg x), zero_mul]
lemma mk_continuous_linear_norm_le' (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
‖mk_continuous_linear f C H‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
begin
dunfold mk_continuous_linear,
exact linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (le_max_right _ _) _
end
lemma mk_continuous_linear_norm_le (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) :
‖mk_continuous_linear f C H‖ ≤ C :=
(mk_continuous_linear_norm_le' f C H).trans_eq (max_eq_left hC)
/-- Given a map `f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G)` and an estimate
`H : ∀ m m', ‖f m m'‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ * ∏ i, ‖m' i‖`, upgrade all `multilinear_map`s in the type to
`continuous_multilinear_map`s. -/
def mk_continuous_multilinear (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G)) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ C * (∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G) :=
mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ m, mk_continuous (f m) (C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) $ H m,
map_add' := λ _ m i x y, by { ext1, simp },
map_smul' := λ _ m i c x, by { ext1, simp } }
(max C 0) $ λ m, ((f m).mk_continuous_norm_le' _).trans_eq $
by { rw [max_mul_of_nonneg, zero_mul], exact prod_nonneg (λ _ _, norm_nonneg _) }
@[simp] lemma mk_continuous_multilinear_apply (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G))
{C : ℝ} (H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ C * (∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) (m : Π i, E i) :
⇑(mk_continuous_multilinear f C H m) = f m :=
rfl
lemma mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le' (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G)) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ C * (∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
‖mk_continuous_multilinear f C H‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
begin
dunfold mk_continuous_multilinear,
exact mk_continuous_norm_le _ (le_max_right _ _) _
end
lemma mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G)) {C : ℝ}
(hC : 0 ≤ C) (H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ C * (∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
‖mk_continuous_multilinear f C H‖ ≤ C :=
(mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le' f C H).trans_eq (max_eq_left hC)
end multilinear_map
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
lemma norm_comp_continuous_linear_le (g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
‖g.comp_continuous_linear_map f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i‖ :=
op_norm_le_bound _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) $ prod_nonneg $ λ i hi, norm_nonneg _) $ λ m,
calc ‖g (λ i, f i (m i))‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i (m i)‖ : g.le_op_norm _
... ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, (‖f i‖ * ‖m i‖) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(prod_le_prod (λ _ _, norm_nonneg _) (λ i hi, (f i).le_op_norm (m i))) (norm_nonneg g)
... = (‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ : by rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
lemma norm_comp_continuous_linear_isometry_le (g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : Π i, E i →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E₁ i) :
‖g.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ i, (f i).to_continuous_linear_map)‖ ≤ ‖g‖ :=
begin
apply op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λ m, _),
apply (g.le_op_norm _).trans _,
simp only [continuous_linear_map.to_linear_map_eq_coe, continuous_linear_map.coe_coe,
linear_isometry.coe_to_continuous_linear_map, linear_isometry.norm_map]
end
lemma norm_comp_continuous_linear_isometry_equiv (g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : Π i, E i ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E₁ i) :
‖g.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ i, (f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i))‖ = ‖g‖ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm (g.norm_comp_continuous_linear_isometry_le (λ i, (f i).to_linear_isometry)),
have : g = (g.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ i, (f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)))
.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ i, ((f i).symm : E₁ i →L[𝕜] E i)),
{ ext1 m,
simp only [comp_continuous_linear_map_apply, linear_isometry_equiv.coe_coe'',
linear_isometry_equiv.apply_symm_apply] },
conv_lhs { rw this },
apply (g.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ i, (f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)))
.norm_comp_continuous_linear_isometry_le (λ i, (f i).symm.to_linear_isometry),
end
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.comp_continuous_linear_map` as a bundled continuous linear map.
This implementation fixes `f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i`.
TODO: Actually, the map is multilinear in `f` but an attempt to formalize this failed because of
issues with class instances. -/
def comp_continuous_linear_mapL (f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ g, g.comp_continuous_linear_map f,
map_add' := λ g₁ g₂, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c g, rfl }
(∏ i, ‖f i‖) $ λ g, (norm_comp_continuous_linear_le _ _).trans_eq (mul_comm _ _)
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_linear_mapL_apply
(g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G) (f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
comp_continuous_linear_mapL f g = g.comp_continuous_linear_map f :=
rfl
lemma norm_comp_continuous_linear_mapL_le (f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
‖@comp_continuous_linear_mapL 𝕜 ι E E₁ G _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f‖ ≤ (∏ i, ‖f i‖) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (prod_nonneg $ λ i _, norm_nonneg _) _
variable (G)
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.comp_continuous_linear_map` as a bundled continuous linear equiv,
given `f : Π i, E i ≃L[𝕜] E₁ i`. -/
def comp_continuous_linear_map_equivL (f : Π i, E i ≃L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G ≃L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G :=
{ inv_fun := comp_continuous_linear_mapL (λ i, ((f i).symm : E₁ i →L[𝕜] E i)),
continuous_to_fun := (comp_continuous_linear_mapL (λ i, (f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i))).continuous,
continuous_inv_fun :=
(comp_continuous_linear_mapL (λ i, ((f i).symm : E₁ i →L[𝕜] E i))).continuous,
left_inv := begin
assume g,
ext1 m,
simp only [continuous_linear_map.to_linear_map_eq_coe, linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe,
continuous_linear_map.coe_coe, comp_continuous_linear_mapL_apply,
comp_continuous_linear_map_apply, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_coe,
continuous_linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply],
end,
right_inv := begin
assume g,
ext1 m,
simp only [continuous_linear_map.to_linear_map_eq_coe, comp_continuous_linear_mapL_apply,
linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, continuous_linear_map.coe_coe, comp_continuous_linear_map_apply,
continuous_linear_equiv.coe_coe, continuous_linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply],
end,
.. comp_continuous_linear_mapL (λ i, (f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)) }
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_linear_map_equivL_symm (f : Π i, E i ≃L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
(comp_continuous_linear_map_equivL G f).symm =
comp_continuous_linear_map_equivL G (λ (i : ι), (f i).symm) :=
rfl
variable {G}
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_linear_map_equivL_apply
(g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G) (f : Π i, E i ≃L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
comp_continuous_linear_map_equivL G f g =
g.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ i, (f i : E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i)) := rfl
end continuous_multilinear_map
section smul
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [module R G] [smul_comm_class 𝕜 R G]
[has_continuous_const_smul R G]
instance : has_continuous_const_smul R (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :=
⟨λ c, (continuous_linear_map.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL 𝕜 _ G G
(c • continuous_linear_map.id 𝕜 G)).2⟩
end smul
section currying
/-!
### Currying
We associate to a continuous multilinear map in `n+1` variables (i.e., based on `fin n.succ`) two
curried functions, named `f.curry_left` (which is a continuous linear map on `E 0` taking values
in continuous multilinear maps in `n` variables) and `f.curry_right` (which is a continuous
multilinear map in `n` variables taking values in continuous linear maps on `E (last n)`).
The inverse operations are called `uncurry_left` and `uncurry_right`.
We also register continuous linear equiv versions of these correspondences, in
`continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv` and `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv`.
-/
open fin function
lemma continuous_linear_map.norm_map_tail_le
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) (m : Πi, Ei i) :
‖f (m 0) (tail m)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
calc
‖f (m 0) (tail m)‖ ≤ ‖f (m 0)‖ * ∏ i, ‖(tail m) i‖ : (f (m 0)).le_op_norm _
... ≤ (‖f‖ * ‖m 0‖) * ∏ i, ‖(tail m) i‖ :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (f.le_op_norm _) (prod_nonneg (λi hi, norm_nonneg _))
... = ‖f‖ * (‖m 0‖ * ∏ i, ‖(tail m) i‖) : by ring
... = ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ : by { rw prod_univ_succ, refl }
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.norm_map_init_le
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G))
(m : Πi, Ei i) :
‖f (init m) (m (last n))‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
calc
‖f (init m) (m (last n))‖ ≤ ‖f (init m)‖ * ‖m (last n)‖ : (f (init m)).le_op_norm _
... ≤ (‖f‖ * (∏ i, ‖(init m) i‖)) * ‖m (last n)‖ :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (f.le_op_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = ‖f‖ * ((∏ i, ‖(init m) i‖) * ‖m (last n)‖) : mul_assoc _ _ _
... = ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ : by { rw prod_univ_cast_succ, refl }
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.norm_map_cons_le
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (x : Ei 0) (m : Π(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) :
‖f (cons x m)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
calc
‖f (cons x m)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖cons x m i‖ : f.le_op_norm _
... = (‖f‖ * ‖x‖) * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ : by { rw prod_univ_succ, simp [mul_assoc] }
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.norm_map_snoc_le
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (m : Π(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (x : Ei (last n)) :
‖f (snoc m x)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * (∏ i, ‖m i‖) * ‖x‖ :=
calc
‖f (snoc m x)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖snoc m x i‖ : f.le_op_norm _
... = ‖f‖ * (∏ i, ‖m i‖) * ‖x‖ : by { rw prod_univ_cast_succ, simp [mul_assoc] }
/-! #### Left currying -/
/-- Given a continuous linear map `f` from `E 0` to continuous multilinear maps on `n` variables,
construct the corresponding continuous multilinear map on `n+1` variables obtained by concatenating
the variables, given by `m ↦ f (m 0) (tail m)`-/
def continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G :=
(@linear_map.uncurry_left 𝕜 n Ei G _ _ _ _ _
(continuous_multilinear_map.to_multilinear_map_linear.comp f.to_linear_map)).mk_continuous
(‖f‖) (λm, continuous_linear_map.norm_map_tail_le f m)
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left_apply
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) (m : Πi, Ei i) :
f.uncurry_left m = f (m 0) (tail m) := rfl
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` in `n+1` variables, split the first variable to obtain
a continuous linear map into continuous multilinear maps in `n` variables, given by
`x ↦ (m ↦ f (cons x m))`. -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) :
Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ -- define a linear map into `n` continuous multilinear maps from an `n+1` continuous multilinear
-- map
to_fun := λx, (f.to_multilinear_map.curry_left x).mk_continuous
(‖f‖ * ‖x‖) (f.norm_map_cons_le x),
map_add' := λx y, by { ext m, exact f.cons_add m x y },
map_smul' := λc x, by { ext m, exact f.cons_smul m c x } }
-- then register its continuity thanks to its boundedness properties.
(‖f‖) (λx, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) _)
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (x : Ei 0) (m : Π(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) :
f.curry_left x m = f (cons x m) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.curry_uncurry_left
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) :
f.uncurry_left.curry_left = f :=
begin
ext m x,
simp only [tail_cons, continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left_apply,
continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left_apply],
rw cons_zero
end
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) : f.curry_left.uncurry_left = f :=
continuous_multilinear_map.to_multilinear_map_injective $ f.to_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left
variables (𝕜 Ei G)
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin (n+1)), E i` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of continuous linear maps from `E 0` to the space of continuous multilinear maps on
`Π(i : fin n), E i.succ `, by separating the first variable. We register this isomorphism in
`continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 E E₂`. The algebraic version (without topology) is given
in `multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 E E₂`.
The direct and inverse maps are given by `f.uncurry_left` and `f.curry_left`. Use these
unless you need the full framework of linear isometric equivs. -/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv :
(Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_bounds
{ to_fun := continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left,
map_add' := λf₁ f₂, by { ext m, refl },
map_smul' := λc f, by { ext m, refl },
inv_fun := continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left,
left_inv := continuous_linear_map.curry_uncurry_left,
right_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left }
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
(λ f, linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
variables {𝕜 Ei G}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv_apply
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.succ) G)) (v : Π i, Ei i) :
continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 Ei G f v = f (v 0) (tail v) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv_symm_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (x : Ei 0) (v : Π i : fin n, Ei i.succ) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).symm f x v = f (cons x v) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left_norm
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) : ‖f.curry_left‖ = ‖f‖ :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).symm.norm_map f
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left_norm
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) :
‖f.uncurry_left‖ = ‖f‖ :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).norm_map f
/-! #### Right currying -/
/-- Given a continuous linear map `f` from continuous multilinear maps on `n` variables to
continuous linear maps on `E 0`, construct the corresponding continuous multilinear map on `n+1`
variables obtained by concatenating the variables, given by `m ↦ f (init m) (m (last n))`. -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G :=
let f' : multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →ₗ[𝕜] G) :=
{ to_fun := λ m, (f m).to_linear_map,
map_add' := λ _ m i x y, by simp,
map_smul' := λ _ m i c x, by simp } in
(@multilinear_map.uncurry_right 𝕜 n Ei G _ _ _ _ _ f').mk_continuous
(‖f‖) (λm, f.norm_map_init_le m)
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G))
(m : Πi, Ei i) :
f.uncurry_right m = f (init m) (m (last n)) := rfl
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` in `n+1` variables, split the last variable to obtain
a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables into continuous linear maps, given by
`m ↦ (x ↦ f (snoc m x))`. -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G) :=
let f' : multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G) :=
{ to_fun := λm, (f.to_multilinear_map.curry_right m).mk_continuous
(‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) $ λx, f.norm_map_snoc_le m x,
map_add' := λ _ m i x y, by { simp, refl },
map_smul' := λ _ m i c x, by { simp, refl } } in
f'.mk_continuous (‖f‖) (λm, linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _
(mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (prod_nonneg (λj hj, norm_nonneg _))) _)
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (m : Π i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (x : Ei (last n)) :
f.curry_right m x = f (snoc m x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_uncurry_right
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)) :
f.uncurry_right.curry_right = f :=
begin
ext m x,
simp only [snoc_last, continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right_apply,
continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right_apply],
rw init_snoc
end
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_right
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) : f.curry_right.uncurry_right = f :=
by { ext m, simp }
variables (𝕜 Ei G)
/--
The space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin (n+1)), Ei i` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ` with values in the space
of continuous linear maps on `Ei (last n)`, by separating the last variable. We register this
isomorphism as a continuous linear equiv in `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G`.
The algebraic version (without topology) is given in `multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G`.
The direct and inverse maps are given by `f.uncurry_right` and `f.curry_right`. Use these
unless you need the full framework of linear isometric equivs.
-/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv :
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_bounds
{ to_fun := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right,
map_add' := λf₁ f₂, by { ext m, refl },
map_smul' := λc f, by { ext m, refl },
inv_fun := continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right,
left_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.curry_uncurry_right,
right_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_right }
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
variables (n G')
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin (n+1)), G` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin n), G` with values in the space
of continuous linear maps on `G`, by separating the last variable. We register this
isomorphism as a continuous linear equiv in `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n G G'`.
For a version allowing dependent types, see `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv`. When there
are no dependent types, use the primed version as it helps Lean a lot for unification.
The direct and inverse maps are given by `f.uncurry_right` and `f.curry_right`. Use these
unless you need the full framework of linear isometric equivs. -/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' :
(G [×n]→L[𝕜] (G →L[𝕜] G')) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (G [×n.succ]→L[𝕜] G') :=
continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 (λ (i : fin n.succ), G) G'
variables {n 𝕜 G Ei G'}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv_apply
(f : (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)))
(v : Π i, Ei i) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G) f v = f (init v) (v (last n)) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv_symm_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G)
(v : Π (i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (x : Ei (last n)) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).symm f v x = f (snoc v x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv_apply'
(f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] (G →L[𝕜] G')) (v : fin (n + 1) → G) :
continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n G G' f v = f (init v) (v (last n)) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv_symm_apply'
(f : G [×n.succ]→L[𝕜] G') (v : fin n → G) (x : G) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n G G').symm f v x = f (snoc v x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right_norm
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) : ‖f.curry_right‖ = ‖f‖ :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).symm.norm_map f
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right_norm
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)) :
‖f.uncurry_right‖ = ‖f‖ :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).norm_map f
/-!
#### Currying with `0` variables
The space of multilinear maps with `0` variables is trivial: such a multilinear map is just an
arbitrary constant (note that multilinear maps in `0` variables need not map `0` to `0`!).
Therefore, the space of continuous multilinear maps on `(fin 0) → G` with values in `E₂` is
isomorphic (and even isometric) to `E₂`. As this is the zeroth step in the construction of iterated
derivatives, we register this isomorphism. -/
section
variables {𝕜 G G'}
/-- Associating to a continuous multilinear map in `0` variables the unique value it takes. -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin 0), G) G') : G' := f 0
variables (𝕜 G)
/-- Associating to an element `x` of a vector space `E₂` the continuous multilinear map in `0`
variables taking the (unique) value `x` -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 (x : G') : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G' :=
continuous_multilinear_map.const_of_is_empty 𝕜 _ x
variable {G}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry0_apply (x : G') (m : (fin 0) → G) :
continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G x m = x := rfl
variable {𝕜}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_apply (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') :
f.uncurry0 = f 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.apply_zero_curry0 (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') {x : fin 0 → G} :
continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G (f x) = f :=
by { ext m, simp [(subsingleton.elim _ _ : x = m)] }
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_curry0 (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') :
continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G (f.uncurry0) = f :=
by simp
variables (𝕜 G)
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry0_uncurry0 (x : G') :
(continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G x).uncurry0 = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry0_norm (x : G') :
‖continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
norm_const_of_is_empty _ _ _
variables {𝕜 G}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.fin0_apply_norm (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') {x : fin 0 → G} :
‖f x‖ = ‖f‖ :=
begin
obtain rfl : x = 0 := subsingleton.elim _ _,
refine le_antisymm (by simpa using f.le_op_norm 0) _,
have : ‖continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G (f.uncurry0)‖ ≤ ‖f.uncurry0‖ :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λm,
by simp [-continuous_multilinear_map.apply_zero_curry0]),
simpa
end
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_norm (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') : ‖f.uncurry0‖ = ‖f‖ :=
by simp
variables (𝕜 G G')
/-- The continuous linear isomorphism between elements of a normed space, and continuous multilinear
maps in `0` variables with values in this normed space.
The direct and inverse maps are `uncurry0` and `curry0`. Use these unless you need the full
framework of linear isometric equivs. -/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 : (G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G' :=
{ to_fun := λf, continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0 f,
inv_fun := λf, continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G f,
map_add' := λf g, rfl,
map_smul' := λc f, rfl,
left_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_curry0,
right_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.curry0_uncurry0 𝕜 G,
norm_map' := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_norm }
variables {𝕜 G G'}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0_apply (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') :
continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 G G' f = f 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0_symm_apply (x : G') (v : (fin 0) → G) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 G G').symm x v = x := rfl
end
/-! #### With 1 variable -/
variables (𝕜 G G')
/-- Continuous multilinear maps from `G^1` to `G'` are isomorphic with continuous linear maps from
`G` to `G'`. -/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 : (G [×1]→L[𝕜] G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (G →L[𝕜] G') :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 (λ (i : fin 1), G) G').symm.trans
(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 G (G →L[𝕜] G'))
variables {𝕜 G G'}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1_apply (f : G [×1]→L[𝕜] G') (x : G) :
continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 G G' f x = f (fin.snoc 0 x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1_symm_apply
(f : G →L[𝕜] G') (v : (fin 1) → G) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 G G').symm f v = f (v 0) := rfl
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
variables (𝕜 G G')
-- fails to unify without `@`; TODO: try again in Lean 4
@[simp] theorem norm_dom_dom_congr (σ : ι ≃ ι') (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ _ : ι, G) G') :
‖@dom_dom_congr 𝕜 ι G G' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ι' σ f‖ = ‖f‖ :=
by simp only [norm_def, linear_equiv.coe_mk, ← σ.prod_comp,
(σ.arrow_congr (equiv.refl G)).surjective.forall, dom_dom_congr_apply, equiv.arrow_congr_apply,
equiv.coe_refl, comp.left_id, comp_app, equiv.symm_apply_apply, id]
/-- An equivalence of the index set defines a linear isometric equivalence between the spaces
of multilinear maps. -/
def dom_dom_congrₗᵢ (σ : ι ≃ ι') :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ _ : ι, G) G' ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ _ : ι', G) G' :=
{ map_add' := λ _ _, rfl,
map_smul' := λ _ _, rfl,
norm_map' := norm_dom_dom_congr 𝕜 G G' σ,
.. dom_dom_congr_equiv σ }
variables {𝕜 G G'}
section
/-- A continuous multilinear map with variables indexed by `ι ⊕ ι'` defines a continuous multilinear
map with variables indexed by `ι` taking values in the space of continuous multilinear maps with
variables indexed by `ι'`. -/
def curry_sum (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι ⊕ ι', G) G') :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι, G) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι', G) G') :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous_multilinear (multilinear_map.curry_sum f.to_multilinear_map) (‖f‖) $
λ m m', by simpa [fintype.prod_sum_type, mul_assoc] using f.le_op_norm (sum.elim m m')
@[simp] lemma curry_sum_apply (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι ⊕ ι', G) G')
(m : ι → G) (m' : ι' → G) :
f.curry_sum m m' = f (sum.elim m m') :=
rfl
/-- A continuous multilinear map with variables indexed by `ι` taking values in the space of
continuous multilinear maps with variables indexed by `ι'` defines a continuous multilinear map with
variables indexed by `ι ⊕ ι'`. -/
def uncurry_sum
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι, G) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι', G) G')) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι ⊕ ι', G) G' :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous
(to_multilinear_map_linear.comp_multilinear_map f.to_multilinear_map).uncurry_sum (‖f‖) $ λ m,
by simpa [fintype.prod_sum_type, mul_assoc]
using (f (m ∘ sum.inl)).le_of_op_norm_le (m ∘ sum.inr) (f.le_op_norm _)
@[simp] lemma uncurry_sum_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι, G) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι', G) G'))
(m : ι ⊕ ι' → G) :
f.uncurry_sum m = f (m ∘ sum.inl) (m ∘ sum.inr) :=
rfl
variables (𝕜 ι ι' G G')
/-- Linear isometric equivalence between the space of continuous multilinear maps with variables
indexed by `ι ⊕ ι'` and the space of continuous multilinear maps with variables indexed by `ι`
taking values in the space of continuous multilinear maps with variables indexed by `ι'`.
The forward and inverse functions are `continuous_multilinear_map.curry_sum`
and `continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_sum`. Use this definition only if you need
some properties of `linear_isometry_equiv`. -/
def curry_sum_equiv : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι ⊕ ι', G) G' ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι, G) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι', G) G') :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_bounds
{ to_fun := curry_sum,
inv_fun := uncurry_sum,
map_add' := λ f g, by { ext, refl },
map_smul' := λ c f, by { ext, refl },
left_inv := λ f, by { ext m, exact congr_arg f (sum.elim_comp_inl_inr m) },
right_inv := λ f, by { ext m₁ m₂, change f _ _ = f _ _,
rw [sum.elim_comp_inl, sum.elim_comp_inr] } }
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
end
section
variables (𝕜 G G') {k l : ℕ} {s : finset (fin n)}
/-- If `s : finset (fin n)` is a finite set of cardinality `k` and its complement has cardinality
`l`, then the space of continuous multilinear maps `G [×n]→L[𝕜] G'` of `n` variables is isomorphic
to the space of continuous multilinear maps `G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G'` of `k` variables taking
values in the space of continuous multilinear maps of `l` variables. -/
def curry_fin_finset {k l n : ℕ} {s : finset (fin n)}
(hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l) :
(G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G') :=
(dom_dom_congrₗᵢ 𝕜 G G' (fin_sum_equiv_of_finset hk hl).symm).trans
(curry_sum_equiv 𝕜 (fin k) (fin l) G G')
variables {𝕜 G G'}
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_apply (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') (mk : fin k → G) (ml : fin l → G) :
curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl f mk ml =
f (λ i, sum.elim mk ml ((fin_sum_equiv_of_finset hk hl).symm i)) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_symm_apply (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G') (m : fin n → G) :
(curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl).symm f m =
f (λ i, m $ fin_sum_equiv_of_finset hk hl (sum.inl i))
(λ i, m $ fin_sum_equiv_of_finset hk hl (sum.inr i)) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_symm_apply_piecewise_const (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G') (x y : G) :
(curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl).symm f (s.piecewise (λ _, x) (λ _, y)) = f (λ _, x) (λ _, y) :=
multilinear_map.curry_fin_finset_symm_apply_piecewise_const hk hl _ x y
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_symm_apply_const (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G') (x : G) :
(curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl).symm f (λ _, x) = f (λ _, x) (λ _, x) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_apply_const (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') (x y : G) :
curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl f (λ _, x) (λ _, y) = f (s.piecewise (λ _, x) (λ _, y)) :=
begin
refine (curry_fin_finset_symm_apply_piecewise_const hk hl _ _ _).symm.trans _, -- `rw` fails
rw linear_isometry_equiv.symm_apply_apply
end
end
end continuous_multilinear_map
end currying
|
6ac4d77b9dda20671fbecb2c9c1a6c8dfa71b1fc | 315b4184091c669ce8e5e07f9b24473c4bcfbaaf | /library/system/io.lean | 784afa12b78c29309215db9909aa47116c2ac27f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | haraldschilly/lean | 78404910ad4c258cdf84e0509e4348c1525e57a9 | d01e2d7ae8250e8f69139d8cb37950079e76ca9d | refs/heads/master | 1,619,977,395,095 | 1,517,501,044,000 | 1,517,940,670,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,029 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Luke Nelson, Jared Roesch and Leonardo de Moura
-/
import system.io_interface
/- The following constants have a builtin implementation -/
constant io_core : Type → Type → Type
@[instance] constant monad_io_impl : monad_io io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_terminal_impl : monad_io_terminal io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_file_system_impl : monad_io_file_system io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_environment_impl : monad_io_environment io_core
@[instance] constant monad_io_process_impl : monad_io_process io_core
instance io_core_is_monad (e : Type) : monad (io_core e) :=
monad_io_is_monad io_core e
instance io_core_is_monad_fail : monad_fail (io_core io.error) :=
monad_io_is_monad_fail io_core
instance io_core_is_alternative : alternative (io_core io.error) :=
monad_io_is_alternative io_core
@[reducible] def io (α : Type) :=
io_core io.error α
namespace io
/- Remark: the following definitions can be generalized and defined for any (m : Type -> Type -> Type)
that implements the required type classes. However, the generalized versions are very inconvenient to use,
(example: `#eval io.put_str "hello world"` does not work because we don't have enough information to infer `m`.).
-/
def iterate {e α} (a : α) (f : α → io_core e (option α)) : io_core e α :=
monad_io.iterate e α a f
def forever {e} (a : io_core e unit) : io_core e unit :=
iterate () $ λ _, a >> return (some ())
-- TODO(Leo): delete after we merge #1881
def catch {e₁ e₂ α} (a : io_core e₁ α) (b : e₁ → io_core e₂ α) : io_core e₂ α :=
monad_io.catch e₁ e₂ α a b
def finally {α e} (a : io_core e α) (cleanup : io_core e unit) : io_core e α := do
res ← catch (sum.inr <$> a) (return ∘ sum.inl),
cleanup,
match res with
| sum.inr res := return res
| sum.inl error := monad_io.fail _ _ _ error
end
protected def fail {α : Type} (s : string) : io α :=
monad_io.fail io_core _ _ (io.error.other s)
def put_str : string → io unit :=
monad_io_terminal.put_str io_core
def put_str_ln (s : string) : io unit :=
put_str s >> put_str "\n"
def get_line : io string :=
monad_io_terminal.get_line io_core
def cmdline_args : io (list string) :=
return (monad_io_terminal.cmdline_args io_core)
def print {α} [has_to_string α] (s : α) : io unit :=
put_str ∘ to_string $ s
def print_ln {α} [has_to_string α] (s : α) : io unit :=
print s >> put_str "\n"
def handle : Type :=
monad_io.handle io_core
def mk_file_handle (s : string) (m : mode) (bin : bool := ff) : io handle :=
monad_io_file_system.mk_file_handle io_core s m bin
def stdin : io handle :=
monad_io_file_system.stdin io_core
def stderr : io handle :=
monad_io_file_system.stderr io_core
def stdout : io handle :=
monad_io_file_system.stdout io_core
namespace env
def get (env_var : string) : io (option string) :=
monad_io_environment.get_env io_core env_var
/-- get the current working directory -/
def get_cwd : io string :=
monad_io_environment.get_cwd io_core
/-- set the current working directory -/
def set_cwd (cwd : string) : io unit :=
monad_io_environment.set_cwd io_core cwd
end env
namespace fs
def is_eof : handle → io bool :=
monad_io_file_system.is_eof
def flush : handle → io unit :=
monad_io_file_system.flush
def close : handle → io unit :=
monad_io_file_system.close
def read : handle → nat → io char_buffer :=
monad_io_file_system.read
def write : handle → char_buffer → io unit :=
monad_io_file_system.write
def get_char (h : handle) : io char :=
do b ← read h 1,
if h : b.size = 1 then return $ b.read ⟨0, h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one⟩
else io.fail "get_char failed"
def get_line : handle → io char_buffer :=
monad_io_file_system.get_line
def put_char (h : handle) (c : char) : io unit :=
write h (mk_buffer.push_back c)
def put_str (h : handle) (s : string) : io unit :=
write h (mk_buffer.append_string s)
def put_str_ln (h : handle) (s : string) : io unit :=
put_str h s >> put_str h "\n"
def read_to_end (h : handle) : io char_buffer :=
iterate mk_buffer $ λ r,
do done ← is_eof h,
if done
then return none
else do
c ← read h 1024,
return $ some (r ++ c)
def read_file (s : string) (bin := ff) : io char_buffer :=
do h ← mk_file_handle s io.mode.read bin,
read_to_end h
end fs
namespace proc
def child : Type :=
monad_io_process.child io_core
def child.stdin : child → handle :=
monad_io_process.stdin
def child.stdout : child → handle :=
monad_io_process.stdout
def child.stderr : child → handle :=
monad_io_process.stderr
def spawn (p : io.process.spawn_args) : io child :=
monad_io_process.spawn io_core p
def wait (c : child) : io nat :=
monad_io_process.wait c
end proc
end io
meta constant format.print_using : format → options → io unit
meta definition format.print (fmt : format) : io unit :=
format.print_using fmt options.mk
meta definition pp_using {α : Type} [has_to_format α] (a : α) (o : options) : io unit :=
format.print_using (to_fmt a) o
meta definition pp {α : Type} [has_to_format α] (a : α) : io unit :=
format.print (to_fmt a)
/-- Run the external process specified by `args`.
The process will run to completion with its output captured by a pipe, and
read into `string` which is then returned. -/
def io.cmd (args : io.process.spawn_args) : io string :=
do child ← io.proc.spawn { stdout := io.process.stdio.piped, ..args },
buf ← io.fs.read_to_end child.stdout,
exitv ← io.proc.wait child,
when (exitv ≠ 0) $ io.fail $ "process exited with status " ++ repr exitv,
return buf.to_string
/--
This is the "back door" into the `io` monad, allowing IO computation to be performed during tactic execution.
For this to be safe, the IO computation should be ideally free of side effects and independent of its environment.
This primitive is used to invoke external tools (e.g., SAT and SMT solvers) from a tactic.
IMPORTANT: this primitive can be used to implement `unsafe_perform_io {α : Type} : io α → option α`
or `unsafe_perform_io {α : Type} [inhabited α] : io α → α`. This can be accomplished by executing
the resulting tactic using an empty `tactic_state` (we have `tactic_state.mk_empty`).
If `unsafe_perform_io` is defined, and used to perform side-effects, users need to take the following
precautions:
- Use `@[noinline]` attribute in any function to invokes `tactic.unsafe_perform_io`.
Reason: if the call is inlined, the IO may be performed more than once.
- Set `set_option compiler.cse false` before any function that invokes `tactic.unsafe_perform_io`.
This option disables common subexpression elimination. Common subexpression elimination
might combine two side effects that were meant to be separate.
TODO[Leo]: add `[noinline]` attribute and option `compiler.cse`.
-/
meta constant tactic.unsafe_run_io {α : Type} : io α → tactic α
|
66cbb5bded58b6c40cdda4c29478191a1cce1a02 | 6094e25ea0b7699e642463b48e51b2ead6ddc23f | /library/theories/group_theory/pgroup.lean | ff1573329177f1e7bd2efcfc1507aaf5f1aa717b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gbaz/lean | a7835c4e3006fbbb079e8f8ffe18aacc45adebfb | a501c308be3acaa50a2c0610ce2e0d71becf8032 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,198,791,433 | 1,451,339,111,000 | 1,451,339,111,000 | 48,713,797 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,451,338,939,000 | 1,451,338,939,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,489 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Haitao Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author : Haitao Zhang
-/
import theories.number_theory.primes data algebra.group algebra.group_power algebra.group_bigops
import .cyclic .finsubg .hom .perm .action
open nat fin list function subtype
namespace group_theory
section pgroup
open finset fintype
variables {G S : Type} [ambientG : group G] [deceqG : decidable_eq G] [finS : fintype S] [deceqS : decidable_eq S]
include ambientG
definition psubg (H : finset G) (p m : nat) : Prop := prime p ∧ card H = p^m
include deceqG finS deceqS
variables {H : finset G} [subgH : is_finsubg H]
include subgH
variables {hom : G → perm S} [Hom : is_hom_class hom]
include Hom
open finset.partition
lemma card_mod_eq_of_action_by_psubg {p : nat} :
∀ {m : nat}, psubg H p m → (card S) % p = (card (fixed_points hom H)) % p
| 0 := by rewrite [↑psubg, pow_zero]; intro Psubg;
rewrite [finsubg_eq_singleton_one_of_card_one (and.right Psubg), fixed_points_of_one]
| (succ m) := take Ppsubg, begin
rewrite [@orbit_class_equation' G S ambientG finS deceqS hom Hom H subgH],
apply add_mod_eq_of_dvd, apply dvd_Sum_of_dvd,
intro s Psin,
rewrite mem_sep_iff at Psin,
cases Psin with Psinorbs Pcardne,
esimp [orbits, equiv_classes, orbit_partition] at Psinorbs,
rewrite mem_image_iff at Psinorbs,
cases Psinorbs with a Pa,
cases Pa with Pain Porb,
substvars,
cases Ppsubg with Pprime PcardH,
assert Pdvd : card (orbit hom H a) ∣ p ^ (succ m),
rewrite -PcardH,
apply dvd_of_eq_mul (finset.card (stab hom H a)),
apply orbit_stabilizer_theorem,
apply or.elim (eq_one_or_dvd_of_dvd_prime_pow Pprime Pdvd),
intro Pcardeq, contradiction,
intro Ppdvd, exact Ppdvd
end
end pgroup
section psubg_cosets
open finset fintype
variables {G : Type} [ambientG : group G] [finG : fintype G] [deceqG : decidable_eq G]
include ambientG deceqG finG
variables {H : finset G} [finsubgH : is_finsubg H]
include finsubgH
lemma card_psubg_cosets_mod_eq {p : nat} {m : nat} :
psubg H p m → (card (lcoset_type univ H)) % p = card (lcoset_type (normalizer H) H) % p :=
assume Psubg, by rewrite [-card_aol_fixed_points_eq_card_cosets]; exact card_mod_eq_of_action_by_psubg Psubg
end psubg_cosets
section cauchy
lemma prodl_rotl_eq_one_of_prodl_eq_one {A B : Type} [gB : group B] {f : A → B} :
∀ {l : list A}, Prodl l f = 1 → Prodl (list.rotl l) f = 1
| nil := assume Peq, rfl
| (a::l) := begin
rewrite [rotl_cons, Prodl_cons f, Prodl_append _ _ f, Prodl_singleton],
exact mul_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one
end
section rotl_peo
variables {A : Type} [ambA : group A]
include ambA
variable [finA : fintype A]
include finA
variable (A)
definition all_prodl_eq_one (n : nat) : list (list A) :=
map (λ l, cons (Prodl l id)⁻¹ l) (all_lists_of_len n)
variable {A}
lemma prodl_eq_one_of_mem_all_prodl_eq_one {n : nat} {l : list A} : l ∈ all_prodl_eq_one A n → Prodl l id = 1 :=
assume Plin, obtain l' Pl' Pl, from exists_of_mem_map Plin,
by substvars; rewrite [Prodl_cons id _ l', mul.left_inv]
lemma length_of_mem_all_prodl_eq_one {n : nat} {l : list A} : l ∈ all_prodl_eq_one A n → length l = succ n :=
assume Plin, obtain l' Pl' Pl, from exists_of_mem_map Plin,
begin substvars, rewrite [length_cons, length_mem_all_lists Pl'] end
lemma nodup_all_prodl_eq_one {n : nat} : nodup (all_prodl_eq_one A n) :=
nodup_map (take l₁ l₂ Peq, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Peq) nodup_all_lists
lemma all_prodl_eq_one_complete {n : nat} : ∀ {l : list A}, length l = succ n → Prodl l id = 1 → l ∈ all_prodl_eq_one A n
| nil := assume Pleq, by contradiction
| (a::l) := assume Pleq Pprod,
begin
rewrite length_cons at Pleq,
rewrite (Prodl_cons id a l) at Pprod,
rewrite [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one Pprod],
apply mem_map, apply mem_all_lists, apply succ.inj Pleq
end
open fintype
lemma length_all_prodl_eq_one {n : nat} : length (@all_prodl_eq_one A _ _ n) = (card A)^n :=
eq.trans !length_map length_all_lists
open fin
definition prodseq {n : nat} (s : seq A n) : A := Prodl (upto n) s
definition peo [reducible] {n : nat} (s : seq A n) := prodseq s = 1
definition constseq {n : nat} (s : seq A (succ n)) := ∀ i, s i = s !zero
lemma prodseq_eq {n :nat} {s : seq A n} : prodseq s = Prodl (fun_to_list s) id :=
Prodl_map
lemma prodseq_eq_pow_of_constseq {n : nat} (s : seq A (succ n)) :
constseq s → prodseq s = (s !zero) ^ succ n :=
assume Pc, assert Pcl : ∀ i, i ∈ upto (succ n) → s i = s !zero,
from take i, assume Pin, Pc i,
by rewrite [↑prodseq, Prodl_eq_pow_of_const _ Pcl, fin.length_upto]
lemma seq_eq_of_constseq_of_eq {n : nat} {s₁ s₂ : seq A (succ n)} :
constseq s₁ → constseq s₂ → s₁ !zero = s₂ !zero → s₁ = s₂ :=
assume Pc₁ Pc₂ Peq, funext take i, by rewrite [Pc₁ i, Pc₂ i, Peq]
lemma peo_const_one : ∀ {n : nat}, peo (λ i : fin n, (1 : A))
| 0 := rfl
| (succ n) := let s := λ i : fin (succ n), (1 : A) in
assert Pconst : constseq s, from take i, rfl,
calc prodseq s = (s !zero) ^ succ n : prodseq_eq_pow_of_constseq s Pconst
... = (1 : A) ^ succ n : rfl
... = 1 : one_pow
variable [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
include deceqA
variable (A)
definition peo_seq [reducible] (n : nat) := {s : seq A (succ n) | peo s}
definition peo_seq_one (n : nat) : peo_seq A n :=
tag (λ i : fin (succ n), (1 : A)) peo_const_one
definition all_prodseq_eq_one (n : nat) : list (seq A (succ n)) :=
dmap (λ l, length l = card (fin (succ n))) list_to_fun (all_prodl_eq_one A n)
definition all_peo_seqs (n : nat) : list (peo_seq A n) :=
dmap peo tag (all_prodseq_eq_one A n)
variable {A}
lemma prodseq_eq_one_of_mem_all_prodseq_eq_one {n : nat} {s : seq A (succ n)} :
s ∈ all_prodseq_eq_one A n → prodseq s = 1 :=
assume Psin, obtain l Pex, from exists_of_mem_dmap Psin,
obtain leq Pin Peq, from Pex,
by rewrite [prodseq_eq, Peq, list_to_fun_to_list, prodl_eq_one_of_mem_all_prodl_eq_one Pin]
lemma all_prodseq_eq_one_complete {n : nat} {s : seq A (succ n)} :
prodseq s = 1 → s ∈ all_prodseq_eq_one A n :=
assume Peq,
assert Plin : map s (elems (fin (succ n))) ∈ all_prodl_eq_one A n,
from begin
apply all_prodl_eq_one_complete,
rewrite [length_map], exact length_upto (succ n),
rewrite prodseq_eq at Peq, exact Peq
end,
assert Psin : list_to_fun (map s (elems (fin (succ n)))) (length_map_of_fintype s) ∈ all_prodseq_eq_one A n,
from mem_dmap _ Plin,
by rewrite [fun_eq_list_to_fun_map s (length_map_of_fintype s)]; apply Psin
lemma nodup_all_prodseq_eq_one {n : nat} : nodup (all_prodseq_eq_one A n) :=
dmap_nodup_of_dinj dinj_list_to_fun nodup_all_prodl_eq_one
lemma rotl1_peo_of_peo {n : nat} {s : seq A n} : peo s → peo (rotl_fun 1 s) :=
begin rewrite [↑peo, *prodseq_eq, seq_rotl_eq_list_rotl], apply prodl_rotl_eq_one_of_prodl_eq_one end
section
local attribute perm.f [coercion]
lemma rotl_perm_peo_of_peo {n : nat} : ∀ {m} {s : seq A n}, peo s → peo (rotl_perm A n m s)
| 0 := begin rewrite [↑rotl_perm, rotl_seq_zero], intros, assumption end
| (succ m) := take s,
assert Pmul : rotl_perm A n (m + 1) s = rotl_fun 1 (rotl_perm A n m s), from
calc s ∘ (rotl (m + 1)) = s ∘ ((rotl m) ∘ (rotl 1)) : rotl_compose
... = s ∘ (rotl m) ∘ (rotl 1) : compose.assoc,
begin
rewrite [-add_one, Pmul], intro P,
exact rotl1_peo_of_peo (rotl_perm_peo_of_peo P)
end
end
lemma nodup_all_peo_seqs {n : nat} : nodup (all_peo_seqs A n) :=
dmap_nodup_of_dinj (dinj_tag peo) nodup_all_prodseq_eq_one
lemma all_peo_seqs_complete {n : nat} : ∀ s : peo_seq A n, s ∈ all_peo_seqs A n :=
take ps, subtype.destruct ps (take s, assume Ps,
assert Pin : s ∈ all_prodseq_eq_one A n, from all_prodseq_eq_one_complete Ps,
mem_dmap Ps Pin)
lemma length_all_peo_seqs {n : nat} : length (all_peo_seqs A n) = (card A)^n :=
eq.trans (eq.trans
(show length (all_peo_seqs A n) = length (all_prodseq_eq_one A n), from
assert Pmap : map elt_of (all_peo_seqs A n) = all_prodseq_eq_one A n,
from map_dmap_of_inv_of_pos (λ s P, rfl)
(λ s, prodseq_eq_one_of_mem_all_prodseq_eq_one),
by rewrite [-Pmap, length_map])
(show length (all_prodseq_eq_one A n) = length (all_prodl_eq_one A n), from
assert Pmap : map fun_to_list (all_prodseq_eq_one A n) = all_prodl_eq_one A n,
from map_dmap_of_inv_of_pos list_to_fun_to_list
(λ l Pin, by rewrite [length_of_mem_all_prodl_eq_one Pin, card_fin]),
by rewrite [-Pmap, length_map]))
length_all_prodl_eq_one
definition peo_seq_is_fintype [instance] {n : nat} : fintype (peo_seq A n) :=
fintype.mk (all_peo_seqs A n) nodup_all_peo_seqs all_peo_seqs_complete
lemma card_peo_seq {n : nat} : card (peo_seq A n) = (card A)^n :=
length_all_peo_seqs
section
variable (A)
local attribute perm.f [coercion]
definition rotl_peo_seq (n : nat) (m : nat) (s : peo_seq A n) : peo_seq A n :=
tag (rotl_perm A (succ n) m (elt_of s)) (rotl_perm_peo_of_peo (has_property s))
variable {A}
end
lemma rotl_peo_seq_zero {n : nat} : rotl_peo_seq A n 0 = id :=
funext take s, subtype.eq begin rewrite [↑rotl_peo_seq, ↑rotl_perm, rotl_seq_zero] end
lemma rotl_peo_seq_id {n : nat} : rotl_peo_seq A n (succ n) = id :=
funext take s, subtype.eq begin rewrite [↑rotl_peo_seq, -rotl_perm_pow_eq, rotl_perm_pow_eq_one] end
lemma rotl_peo_seq_compose {n i j : nat} :
(rotl_peo_seq A n i) ∘ (rotl_peo_seq A n j) = rotl_peo_seq A n (j + i) :=
funext take s, subtype.eq begin rewrite [↑rotl_peo_seq, ↑rotl_perm, ↑rotl_fun, compose.assoc, rotl_compose] end
lemma rotl_peo_seq_mod {n i : nat} : rotl_peo_seq A n i = rotl_peo_seq A n (i % succ n) :=
funext take s, subtype.eq begin rewrite [↑rotl_peo_seq, rotl_perm_mod] end
lemma rotl_peo_seq_inj {n m : nat} : injective (rotl_peo_seq A n m) :=
take ps₁ ps₂, subtype.destruct ps₁ (λ s₁ P₁, subtype.destruct ps₂ (λ s₂ P₂,
assume Peq, tag_eq (rotl_fun_inj (dinj_tag peo _ _ Peq))))
variable (A)
definition rotl_perm_ps [reducible] (n : nat) (m : fin (succ n)) : perm (peo_seq A n) :=
perm.mk (rotl_peo_seq A n m) rotl_peo_seq_inj
variable {A}
variable {n : nat}
lemma rotl_perm_ps_eq {m : fin (succ n)} {s : peo_seq A n} : elt_of (perm.f (rotl_perm_ps A n m) s) = perm.f (rotl_perm A (succ n) m) (elt_of s) := rfl
lemma rotl_perm_ps_eq_of_rotl_perm_eq {i j : fin (succ n)} :
(rotl_perm A (succ n) i) = (rotl_perm A (succ n) j) → (rotl_perm_ps A n i) = (rotl_perm_ps A n j) :=
assume Peq, eq_of_feq (funext take s, subtype.eq (by rewrite [*rotl_perm_ps_eq, Peq]))
lemma rotl_perm_ps_hom (i j : fin (succ n)) :
rotl_perm_ps A n (i+j) = (rotl_perm_ps A n i) * (rotl_perm_ps A n j) :=
eq_of_feq (begin rewrite [↑rotl_perm_ps, {val (i+j)}val_madd, add.comm, -rotl_peo_seq_mod, -rotl_peo_seq_compose] end)
section
local attribute group_of_add_group [instance]
definition rotl_perm_ps_is_hom [instance] : is_hom_class (rotl_perm_ps A n) :=
is_hom_class.mk rotl_perm_ps_hom
open finset
lemma const_of_is_fixed_point {s : peo_seq A n} :
is_fixed_point (rotl_perm_ps A n) univ s → constseq (elt_of s) :=
assume Pfp, take i, begin
rewrite [-(Pfp i !mem_univ) at {1}, rotl_perm_ps_eq, ↑rotl_perm, ↑rotl_fun, {i}mk_mod_eq at {2}, rotl_to_zero]
end
lemma const_of_rotl_fixed_point {s : peo_seq A n} :
s ∈ fixed_points (rotl_perm_ps A n) univ → constseq (elt_of s) :=
assume Psin, take i, begin
apply const_of_is_fixed_point, exact is_fixed_point_of_mem_fixed_points Psin
end
lemma pow_eq_one_of_mem_fixed_points {s : peo_seq A n} :
s ∈ fixed_points (rotl_perm_ps A n) univ → (elt_of s !zero)^(succ n) = 1 :=
assume Psin, eq.trans
(eq.symm (prodseq_eq_pow_of_constseq (elt_of s) (const_of_rotl_fixed_point Psin)))
(has_property s)
lemma peo_seq_one_is_fixed_point : is_fixed_point (rotl_perm_ps A n) univ (peo_seq_one A n) :=
take h, assume Pin, by esimp [rotl_perm_ps]
lemma peo_seq_one_mem_fixed_points : peo_seq_one A n ∈ fixed_points (rotl_perm_ps A n) univ :=
mem_fixed_points_of_exists_of_is_fixed_point (exists.intro !zero !mem_univ) peo_seq_one_is_fixed_point
lemma generator_of_prime_of_dvd_order {p : nat}
: prime p → p ∣ card A → ∃ g : A, g ≠ 1 ∧ g^p = 1 :=
assume Pprime Pdvd,
let pp := nat.pred p, spp := nat.succ pp in
assert Peq : spp = p, from succ_pred_prime Pprime,
assert Ppsubg : psubg (@univ (fin spp) _) spp 1,
from and.intro (eq.symm Peq ▸ Pprime) (by rewrite [Peq, card_fin, pow_one]),
have (pow_nat (card A) pp) % spp = (card (fixed_points (rotl_perm_ps A pp) univ)) % spp,
by rewrite -card_peo_seq; apply card_mod_eq_of_action_by_psubg Ppsubg,
have Pcardmod : (pow_nat (card A) pp) % p = (card (fixed_points (rotl_perm_ps A pp) univ)) % p,
from Peq ▸ this,
have Pfpcardmod : (card (fixed_points (rotl_perm_ps A pp) univ)) % p = 0,
from eq.trans (eq.symm Pcardmod) (mod_eq_zero_of_dvd (dvd_pow_of_dvd_of_pos Pdvd (pred_prime_pos Pprime))),
have Pfpcardpos : card (fixed_points (rotl_perm_ps A pp) univ) > 0,
from card_pos_of_mem peo_seq_one_mem_fixed_points,
have Pfpcardgt1 : card (fixed_points (rotl_perm_ps A pp) univ) > 1,
from gt_one_of_pos_of_prime_dvd Pprime Pfpcardpos Pfpcardmod,
obtain s₁ s₂ Pin₁ Pin₂ Psnes, from exists_two_of_card_gt_one Pfpcardgt1,
decidable.by_cases
(λ Pe₁ : elt_of s₁ !zero = 1,
assert Pne₂ : elt_of s₂ !zero ≠ 1,
from assume Pe₂,
absurd
(subtype.eq (seq_eq_of_constseq_of_eq
(const_of_rotl_fixed_point Pin₁)
(const_of_rotl_fixed_point Pin₂)
(eq.trans Pe₁ (eq.symm Pe₂))))
Psnes,
exists.intro (elt_of s₂ !zero)
(and.intro Pne₂ (Peq ▸ pow_eq_one_of_mem_fixed_points Pin₂)))
(λ Pne, exists.intro (elt_of s₁ !zero)
(and.intro Pne (Peq ▸ pow_eq_one_of_mem_fixed_points Pin₁)))
end
theorem cauchy_theorem {p : nat} : prime p → p ∣ card A → ∃ g : A, order g = p :=
assume Pprime Pdvd,
obtain g Pne Pgpow, from generator_of_prime_of_dvd_order Pprime Pdvd,
assert Porder : order g ∣ p, from order_dvd_of_pow_eq_one Pgpow,
or.elim (eq_one_or_eq_self_of_prime_of_dvd Pprime Porder)
(λ Pe, absurd (eq_one_of_order_eq_one Pe) Pne)
(λ Porderp, exists.intro g Porderp)
end rotl_peo
end cauchy
section sylow
open finset fintype
variables {G : Type} [ambientG : group G] [finG : fintype G] [deceqG : decidable_eq G]
include ambientG deceqG finG
theorem first_sylow_theorem {p : nat} (Pp : prime p) :
∀ n, p^n ∣ card G → ∃ (H : finset G) (finsubgH : is_finsubg H), card H = p^n
| 0 := assume Pdvd, exists.intro (singleton 1)
(exists.intro one_is_finsubg
(by rewrite [card_singleton, pow_zero]))
| (succ n) := assume Pdvd,
obtain H PfinsubgH PcardH, from first_sylow_theorem n (pow_dvd_of_pow_succ_dvd Pdvd),
assert Ppsubg : psubg H p n, from and.intro Pp PcardH,
assert Ppowsucc : p^(succ n) ∣ (card (lcoset_type univ H) * p^n),
by rewrite [-PcardH, -(lagrange_theorem' !subset_univ)]; exact Pdvd,
assert Ppdvd : p ∣ card (lcoset_type (normalizer H) H), from
dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
(by rewrite [-(card_psubg_cosets_mod_eq Ppsubg), -dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero];
exact dvd_of_pow_succ_dvd_mul_pow (pos_of_prime Pp) Ppowsucc),
obtain J PJ, from cauchy_theorem Pp Ppdvd,
exists.intro (fin_coset_Union (cyc J))
(exists.intro _
(by rewrite [pow_succ, -PcardH, -PJ]; apply card_Union_lcosets))
end sylow
end group_theory
|
9825b57deaacf65f6088e66928cd0677d8b1dec9 | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /tests/lean/resolveGlobalName.lean | 67f75301e77ce2fe1a851d836ebf253d91739298 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 584 | lean | import Lean
new_frontend
def Boo.x := 1
def Foo.x := 2
def Foo.x.y := 3
def Bla.x := 4
namespace Test
export Bla (x)
end Test
open Lean.Elab.Term
open Lean.Elab.Command
syntax[resolveKind] "#resolve " ident : command
@[commandElab resolveKind] def elabResolve : CommandElab :=
fun stx => liftTermElabM none do
let cs ← resolveGlobalName $ stx.getIdAt 1;
Lean.Elab.logInfo $ toString cs;
pure ()
#resolve x.y
#resolve x
open Foo
#resolve x
#resolve x.y
#resolve x.z.w
open Boo
#resolve x
#resolve x.y
#resolve x.z.w
open Test
#resolve x
#resolve x.w.h.r
#resolve x.y
|
db3cf840834605fc9a6066a9f0d4154f913fa39d | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/number_theory/sum_four_squares.lean | 7f12d0225ecb3518ddcf6346586cc563925f69f6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,911 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
## Lagrange's four square theorem
The main result in this file is `sum_four_squares`,
a proof that every natural number is the sum of four square numbers.
# Implementation Notes
The proof used is close to Lagrange's original proof.
-/
import data.zmod.basic
import field_theory.finite
import data.int.parity
import data.fintype.card
open finset polynomial finite_field equiv
namespace int
lemma sum_two_squares_of_two_mul_sum_two_squares {m x y : ℤ} (h : 2 * m = x^2 + y^2) :
m = ((x - y) / 2) ^ 2 + ((x + y) / 2) ^ 2 :=
have (x^2 + y^2).even, by simp [h.symm, even_mul],
have hxaddy : (x + y).even, by simpa [pow_two] with parity_simps,
have hxsuby : (x - y).even, by simpa [pow_two] with parity_simps,
have (x^2 + y^2) % 2 = 0, by simp [h.symm],
(domain.mul_right_inj (show (2*2 : ℤ) ≠ 0, from dec_trivial)).1 $
calc 2 * 2 * m = (x - y)^2 + (x + y)^2 : by rw [mul_assoc, h]; ring
... = (2 * ((x - y) / 2))^2 + (2 * ((x + y) / 2))^2 :
by rw [int.mul_div_cancel' hxsuby, int.mul_div_cancel' hxaddy]
... = 2 * 2 * (((x - y) / 2) ^ 2 + ((x + y) / 2) ^ 2) :
by simp [mul_add, _root_.pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
lemma exists_sum_two_squares_add_one_eq_k (p : ℕ) [hp : fact p.prime] :
∃ (a b : ℤ) (k : ℕ), a^2 + b^2 + 1 = k * p ∧ k < p :=
hp.eq_two_or_odd.elim (λ hp2, hp2.symm ▸ ⟨1, 0, 1, rfl, dec_trivial⟩) $ λ hp1,
let ⟨a, b, hab⟩ := zmod.sum_two_squares p (-1) in
have hab' : (p : ℤ) ∣ a.val_min_abs ^ 2 + b.val_min_abs ^ 2 + 1,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod p) p _).1 $ by simpa [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero] using hab,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hab' in
have hk0 : 0 ≤ k, from nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left
(by rw ← hk; exact (add_nonneg (add_nonneg (pow_two_nonneg _) (pow_two_nonneg _)) zero_le_one))
(int.coe_nat_pos.2 hp.pos),
⟨a.val_min_abs, b.val_min_abs, k.nat_abs,
by rw [hk, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hk0, mul_comm],
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
(calc p * k.nat_abs = a.val_min_abs.nat_abs ^ 2 + b.val_min_abs.nat_abs ^ 2 + 1 :
by rw [← int.coe_nat_inj', int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_pow,
int.coe_nat_pow, int.nat_abs_pow_two, int.nat_abs_pow_two,
int.coe_nat_one, hk, int.coe_nat_mul, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hk0]
... ≤ (p / 2) ^ 2 + (p / 2)^2 + 1 :
add_le_add
(add_le_add
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _)
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _))
(le_refl _)
... < (p / 2) ^ 2 + (p / 2)^ 2 + (p % 2)^2 + ((2 * (p / 2)^2 + (4 * (p / 2) * (p % 2)))) :
by rw [hp1, nat.one_pow, mul_one];
exact (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2
(add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (nat.zero_le _) (mul_pos dec_trivial
(nat.div_pos hp.two_le dec_trivial)))
... = p * p : by { conv_rhs { rw [← nat.mod_add_div p 2] }, ring })
(show 0 ≤ p, from nat.zero_le _)⟩
end int
namespace nat
open int
open_locale classical
private lemma sum_four_squares_of_two_mul_sum_four_squares {m a b c d : ℤ}
(h : a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = 2 * m) : ∃ w x y z : ℤ, w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = m :=
have ∀ f : fin 4 → zmod 2, (f 0)^2 + (f 1)^2 + (f 2)^2 + (f 3)^2 = 0 →
∃ i : (fin 4), (f i)^2 + f (swap i 0 1)^2 = 0 ∧ f (swap i 0 2)^2 + f (swap i 0 3)^2 = 0,
from dec_trivial,
let f : fin 4 → ℤ := vector.nth (a::b::c::d::vector.nil) in
let ⟨i, hσ⟩ := this (coe ∘ f) (by rw [← @zero_mul (zmod 2) _ m, ← show ((2 : ℤ) : zmod 2) = 0, from rfl,
← int.cast_mul, ← h]; simp only [int.cast_add, int.cast_pow]; refl) in
let σ := swap i 0 in
have h01 : 2 ∣ f (σ 0) ^ 2 + f (σ 1) ^ 2,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod 2) 2 _).1 $ by simpa [σ] using hσ.1,
have h23 : 2 ∣ f (σ 2) ^ 2 + f (σ 3) ^ 2,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod 2) 2 _).1 $ by simpa using hσ.2,
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h01 in let ⟨y, hy⟩ := h23 in
⟨(f (σ 0) - f (σ 1)) / 2, (f (σ 0) + f (σ 1)) / 2, (f (σ 2) - f (σ 3)) / 2, (f (σ 2) + f (σ 3)) / 2,
begin
rw [← int.sum_two_squares_of_two_mul_sum_two_squares hx.symm, add_assoc,
← int.sum_two_squares_of_two_mul_sum_two_squares hy.symm,
← domain.mul_right_inj (show (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0, from dec_trivial), ← h, mul_add, ← hx, ← hy],
have : univ.sum (λ x, f (σ x)^2) = univ.sum (λ x, f x^2),
{ conv_rhs { rw ← finset.sum_equiv σ } },
have fin4univ : (univ : finset (fin 4)).1 = 0::1::2::3::0, from dec_trivial,
simpa [finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, fin4univ, multiset.sum_cons, f, add_assoc]
end⟩
private lemma prime_sum_four_squares (p : ℕ) [hp : _root_.fact p.prime] :
∃ a b c d : ℤ, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = p :=
have hm : ∃ m < p, 0 < m ∧ ∃ a b c d : ℤ, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = m * p,
from let ⟨a, b, k, hk⟩ := exists_sum_two_squares_add_one_eq_k p in
⟨k, hk.2, nat.pos_of_ne_zero $
(λ hk0, by rw [hk0, int.coe_nat_zero, zero_mul] at hk;
exact ne_of_gt (show a^2 + b^2 + 1 > 0, from add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos
(add_nonneg (pow_two_nonneg _) (pow_two_nonneg _)) zero_lt_one) hk.1),
a, b, 1, 0, by simpa [_root_.pow_two] using hk.1⟩,
let m := nat.find hm in
let ⟨a, b, c, d, (habcd : a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = m * p)⟩ := (nat.find_spec hm).snd.2 in
by haveI hm0 : _root_.fact (0 < m) := (nat.find_spec hm).snd.1; exact
have hmp : m < p, from (nat.find_spec hm).fst,
m.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one.elim
(λ hm2 : m % 2 = 0,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := (nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).2 hm2 in
have hk0 : 0 < k, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero $ λ _, by { simp [*, lt_irrefl] at *, exact hm0 },
have hkm : k < m, by rw [hk, two_mul]; exact (lt_add_iff_pos_left _).2 hk0,
false.elim $ nat.find_min hm hkm ⟨lt_trans hkm hmp, hk0,
sum_four_squares_of_two_mul_sum_four_squares
(show a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = 2 * (k * p),
by rw [habcd, hk, int.coe_nat_mul, mul_assoc]; simp)⟩)
(λ hm2 : m % 2 = 1,
if hm1 : m = 1 then ⟨a, b, c, d, by simp only [hm1, habcd, int.coe_nat_one, one_mul]⟩
else --have hm1 : 1 < m, from lt_of_le_of_ne hm0 (ne.symm hm1),
let w := (a : zmod m).val_min_abs, x := (b : zmod m).val_min_abs,
y := (c : zmod m).val_min_abs, z := (d : zmod m).val_min_abs in
have hnat_abs : w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 =
(w.nat_abs^2 + x.nat_abs^2 + y.nat_abs ^2 + z.nat_abs ^ 2 : ℕ),
by simp [_root_.pow_two],
have hwxyzlt : w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 < m^2,
from calc w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2
= (w.nat_abs^2 + x.nat_abs^2 + y.nat_abs ^2 + z.nat_abs ^ 2 : ℕ) : hnat_abs
... ≤ ((m / 2) ^ 2 + (m / 2) ^ 2 + (m / 2) ^ 2 + (m / 2) ^ 2 : ℕ) :
int.coe_nat_le.2 $ add_le_add (add_le_add (add_le_add
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _)
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _))
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _))
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _)
... = 4 * (m / 2 : ℕ) ^ 2 : by simp [_root_.pow_two, bit0, bit1, mul_add, add_mul, add_assoc]
... < 4 * (m / 2 : ℕ) ^ 2 + ((4 * (m / 2) : ℕ) * (m % 2 : ℕ) + (m % 2 : ℕ)^2) :
(lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 (by rw [hm2, int.coe_nat_one, _root_.one_pow, mul_one];
exact add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (int.coe_nat_nonneg _) zero_lt_one)
... = m ^ 2 : by conv_rhs {rw [← nat.mod_add_div m 2]};
simp [-nat.mod_add_div, mul_add, add_mul, bit0, bit1, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm,
_root_.pow_add, add_comm, add_left_comm],
have hwxyzabcd : ((w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 : ℤ) : zmod m) =
((a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 : ℤ) : zmod m),
by simp [w, x, y, z, pow_two],
have hwxyz0 : ((w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 : ℤ) : zmod m) = 0,
by rw [hwxyzabcd, habcd, int.cast_mul, cast_coe_nat, zmod.cast_self, zero_mul],
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ((char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff _ m _).1 hwxyz0) in
have hn0 : 0 < n.nat_abs, from int.nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero (λ hn0,
have hwxyz0 : (w.nat_abs^2 + x.nat_abs^2 + y.nat_abs^2 + z.nat_abs^2 : ℕ) = 0,
by { rw [← int.coe_nat_eq_zero, ← hnat_abs], rwa [hn0, mul_zero] at hn },
have habcd0 : (m : ℤ) ∣ a ∧ (m : ℤ) ∣ b ∧ (m : ℤ) ∣ c ∧ (m : ℤ) ∣ d,
by simpa [@add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_nonneg ℤ _ _ _ (pow_two_nonneg _) (pow_two_nonneg _),
nat.pow_two, w, x, y, z, (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff _ m _), and.assoc] using hwxyz0,
let ⟨ma, hma⟩ := habcd0.1, ⟨mb, hmb⟩ := habcd0.2.1,
⟨mc, hmc⟩ := habcd0.2.2.1, ⟨md, hmd⟩ := habcd0.2.2.2 in
have hmdvdp : m ∣ p,
from int.coe_nat_dvd.1 ⟨ma^2 + mb^2 + mc^2 + md^2,
(domain.mul_right_inj (show (m : ℤ) ≠ 0, from int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 hm0)).1 $
by rw [← habcd, hma, hmb, hmc, hmd]; ring⟩,
(hp.2 _ hmdvdp).elim hm1 (λ hmeqp, by simpa [lt_irrefl, hmeqp] using hmp)),
have hawbxcydz : ((m : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a * w + b * x + c * y + d * z,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod m) m _).1 $ by rw [← hwxyz0]; simp; ring,
have haxbwczdy : ((m : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a * x - b * w - c * z + d * y,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod m) m _).1 $ by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]; ring,
have haybzcwdx : ((m : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a * y + b * z - c * w - d * x,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod m) m _).1 $ by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]; ring,
have hazbycxdw : ((m : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a * z - b * y + c * x - d * w,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod m) m _).1 $ by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]; ring,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hawbxcydz, ⟨t, ht⟩ := haxbwczdy, ⟨u, hu⟩ := haybzcwdx, ⟨v, hv⟩ := hazbycxdw in
have hn_nonneg : 0 ≤ n,
from nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left
(by erw [← hn]; repeat {try {refine add_nonneg _ _}, try {exact pow_two_nonneg _}})
(int.coe_nat_pos.2 hm0),
have hnm : n.nat_abs < m,
from int.coe_nat_lt.1 (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
(by rw [int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hn_nonneg, ← hn, ← _root_.pow_two]; exact hwxyzlt)
(int.coe_nat_nonneg m)),
have hstuv : s^2 + t^2 + u^2 + v^2 = n.nat_abs * p,
from (domain.mul_right_inj (show (m^2 : ℤ) ≠ 0, from pow_ne_zero 2
(int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 hm0))).1 $
calc (m : ℤ)^2 * (s^2 + t^2 + u^2 + v^2) = ((m : ℕ) * s)^2 + ((m : ℕ) * t)^2 +
((m : ℕ) * u)^2 + ((m : ℕ) * v)^2 :
by simp [_root_.mul_pow]; ring
... = (w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2) * (a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2) :
by simp only [hs.symm, ht.symm, hu.symm, hv.symm]; ring
... = _ : by rw [hn, habcd, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hn_nonneg]; dsimp [m]; ring,
false.elim $ nat.find_min hm hnm ⟨lt_trans hnm hmp, hn0, s, t, u, v, hstuv⟩)
lemma sum_four_squares : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ a b c d : ℕ, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = n
| 0 := ⟨0, 0, 0, 0, rfl⟩
| 1 := ⟨1, 0, 0, 0, rfl⟩
| n@(k+2) :=
have hm : _root_.fact (min_fac (k+2)).prime := min_fac_prime dec_trivial,
have n / min_fac n < n := factors_lemma,
let ⟨a, b, c, d, h₁⟩ := show ∃ a b c d : ℤ, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = min_fac n,
by exactI prime_sum_four_squares (min_fac (k+2)) in
let ⟨w, x, y, z, h₂⟩ := sum_four_squares (n / min_fac n) in
⟨(a * x - b * w - c * z + d * y).nat_abs,
(a * y + b * z - c * w - d * x).nat_abs,
(a * z - b * y + c * x - d * w).nat_abs,
(a * w + b * x + c * y + d * z).nat_abs,
begin
rw [← int.coe_nat_inj', ← nat.mul_div_cancel' (min_fac_dvd (k+2)), int.coe_nat_mul, ← h₁, ← h₂],
simp,
ring
end⟩
end nat
|
14655925f490d77d3362f80cab8dd488d7b1725a | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/topology/algebra/uniform_ring.lean | 575830ffd1d695f533060a1c45b6873ad239f26b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,532 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
Theory of topological rings with uniform structure.
-/
import topology.algebra.group_completion topology.algebra.ring
open classical set filter topological_space add_comm_group
open_locale classical
noncomputable theory
namespace uniform_space.completion
open dense_inducing uniform_space function
variables (α : Type*) [ring α] [uniform_space α]
instance : has_one (completion α) := ⟨(1:α)⟩
instance : has_mul (completion α) :=
⟨curry $ (dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend (coe ∘ uncurry' (*))⟩
@[elim_cast]
lemma coe_one : ((1 : α) : completion α) = 1 := rfl
variables {α} [topological_ring α]
@[move_cast]
lemma coe_mul (a b : α) : ((a * b : α) : completion α) = a * b :=
((dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend_eq_of_cont
((continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul) (a, b)).symm
variables [uniform_add_group α]
lemma continuous_mul : continuous (λ p : completion α × completion α, p.1 * p.2) :=
begin
haveI : is_Z_bilin ((coe ∘ uncurry' (*)) : α × α → completion α) :=
{ add_left := begin
introv,
change coe ((a + a')*b) = coe (a*b) + coe (a'*b),
rw_mod_cast add_mul
end,
add_right := begin
introv,
change coe (a*(b + b')) = coe (a*b) + coe (a*b'),
rw_mod_cast mul_add
end },
have : continuous ((coe ∘ uncurry' (*)) : α × α → completion α),
from (continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul,
convert dense_inducing_coe.extend_Z_bilin dense_inducing_coe this,
simp only [(*), curry, prod.mk.eta]
end
lemma continuous.mul {β : Type*} [topological_space β] {f g : β → completion α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, f b * g b) :=
continuous_mul.comp (continuous.prod_mk hf hg)
instance : ring (completion α) :=
{ one_mul := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous.mul continuous_const continuous_id) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, one_mul]),
mul_one := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous.mul continuous_id continuous_const) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, mul_one]),
mul_assoc := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul (continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul continuous_fst
(continuous.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_assoc]),
left_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous.add
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)))
(continuous.add
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, mul_add]),
right_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul (continuous.add continuous_fst
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.add
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, add_mul]),
..completion.add_comm_group, ..completion.has_mul α, ..completion.has_one α }
instance is_ring_hom_coe : is_ring_hom (coe : α → completion α) :=
⟨coe_one α, assume a b, coe_mul a b, assume a b, coe_add a b⟩
universes u
variables {β : Type u} [uniform_space β] [ring β] [uniform_add_group β] [topological_ring β]
{f : α → β} [is_ring_hom f] (hf : continuous f)
/-- The completion extension is a ring morphism.
This cannot be an instance, since it depends on the continuity of `f`. -/
protected lemma is_ring_hom_extension [complete_space β] [separated β] :
is_ring_hom (completion.extension f) :=
have hf : uniform_continuous f, from uniform_continuous_of_continuous hf,
{ map_one := by rw [← coe_one, extension_coe hf, is_ring_hom.map_one f],
map_add := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_add)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).add
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_add, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf,
is_add_hom.map_add f]),
map_mul := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_mul)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_mul, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, is_ring_hom.map_mul f]) }
instance top_ring_compl : topological_ring (completion α) :=
{ continuous_add := continuous_add,
continuous_mul := continuous_mul,
continuous_neg := continuous_neg }
/-- The completion map is a ring morphism.
This cannot be an instance, since it depends on the continuity of `f`. -/
protected lemma is_ring_hom_map : is_ring_hom (completion.map f) :=
@completion.is_ring_hom_extension _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (is_ring_hom.comp _ _)
((continuous_coe β).comp hf) _ _
variables (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] [uniform_space R] [uniform_add_group R] [topological_ring R]
instance : comm_ring (completion R) :=
{ mul_comm := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq (continuous_fst.mul continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.mul continuous_fst))
(assume a b, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_comm]),
..completion.ring }
end uniform_space.completion
namespace uniform_space
variables {α : Type*}
lemma ring_sep_rel (α) [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
separation_setoid α = submodule.quotient_rel (ideal.closure ⊥) :=
setoid.ext $ assume x y, group_separation_rel x y
lemma ring_sep_quot (α) [r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) = (⊥ : ideal α).closure.quotient :=
by rw [@ring_sep_rel α r]; refl
def sep_quot_equiv_ring_quot (α)
[r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) ≃ (⊥ : ideal α).closure.quotient :=
quotient.congr_right $ assume x y, group_separation_rel x y
/- TODO: use a form of transport a.k.a. lift definition a.k.a. transfer -/
instance [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
comm_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
by rw ring_sep_quot α; apply_instance
instance [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
topological_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
begin
convert topological_ring_quotient (⊥ : ideal α).closure; try {apply ring_sep_rel},
simp [uniform_space.comm_ring]
end
end uniform_space
|
0288378dfc3341905c5ffa2dcfb1049cf170bd9a | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/algebra/polynomial/group_ring_action.lean | 7ea378ace04355014d42c0b860ee9cdcd4e27a71 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,725 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.polynomial.monic
import Mathlib.algebra.group_ring_action
import Mathlib.algebra.group_action_hom
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2 u_3 u_4
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Group action on rings applied to polynomials
This file contains instances and definitions relating `mul_semiring_action` to `polynomial`.
-/
namespace polynomial
protected instance mul_semiring_action (M : Type u_1) [monoid M] (R : Type u_2) [semiring R] [mul_semiring_action M R] : mul_semiring_action M (polynomial R) :=
mul_semiring_action.mk sorry sorry
protected instance faithful_mul_semiring_action (M : Type u_1) [monoid M] (R : Type u_2) [semiring R] [faithful_mul_semiring_action M R] : faithful_mul_semiring_action M (polynomial R) :=
faithful_mul_semiring_action.mk sorry
@[simp] theorem coeff_smul' {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] {R : Type u_2} [semiring R] [mul_semiring_action M R] (m : M) (p : polynomial R) (n : ℕ) : coeff (m • p) n = m • coeff p n :=
coeff_map (mul_semiring_action.to_semiring_hom M R m) n
@[simp] theorem smul_C {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] {R : Type u_2} [semiring R] [mul_semiring_action M R] (m : M) (r : R) : m • coe_fn C r = coe_fn C (m • r) :=
map_C (mul_semiring_action.to_semiring_hom M R m)
@[simp] theorem smul_X {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] {R : Type u_2} [semiring R] [mul_semiring_action M R] (m : M) : m • X = X :=
map_X (mul_semiring_action.to_semiring_hom M R m)
theorem smul_eval_smul {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] (S : Type u_3) [comm_semiring S] [mul_semiring_action M S] (m : M) (f : polynomial S) (x : S) : eval (m • x) (m • f) = m • eval x f := sorry
theorem eval_smul' (S : Type u_3) [comm_semiring S] (G : Type u_4) [group G] [mul_semiring_action G S] (g : G) (f : polynomial S) (x : S) : eval (g • x) f = g • eval x (g⁻¹ • f) :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (eval (g • x) f = g • eval x (g⁻¹ • f))) (Eq.symm (smul_eval_smul S g (g⁻¹ • f) x))))
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (eval (g • x) f = eval (g • x) (g • g⁻¹ • f))) (smul_inv_smul g f)))
(Eq.refl (eval (g • x) f)))
theorem smul_eval (S : Type u_3) [comm_semiring S] (G : Type u_4) [group G] [mul_semiring_action G S] (g : G) (f : polynomial S) (x : S) : eval x (g • f) = g • eval (g⁻¹ • x) f :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (eval x (g • f) = g • eval (g⁻¹ • x) f)) (Eq.symm (smul_eval_smul S g f (g⁻¹ • x)))))
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (eval x (g • f) = eval (g • g⁻¹ • x) (g • f))) (smul_inv_smul g x)))
(Eq.refl (eval x (g • f))))
end polynomial
/-- the product of `(X - g • x)` over distinct `g • x`. -/
def prod_X_sub_smul (G : Type u_2) [group G] [fintype G] (R : Type u_3) [comm_ring R] [mul_semiring_action G R] (x : R) : polynomial R :=
finset.prod finset.univ
fun (g : quotient_group.quotient (mul_action.stabilizer G x)) =>
polynomial.X - coe_fn polynomial.C (mul_action.of_quotient_stabilizer G x g)
theorem prod_X_sub_smul.monic (G : Type u_2) [group G] [fintype G] (R : Type u_3) [comm_ring R] [mul_semiring_action G R] (x : R) : polynomial.monic (prod_X_sub_smul G R x) := sorry
theorem prod_X_sub_smul.eval (G : Type u_2) [group G] [fintype G] (R : Type u_3) [comm_ring R] [mul_semiring_action G R] (x : R) : polynomial.eval x (prod_X_sub_smul G R x) = 0 := sorry
theorem prod_X_sub_smul.smul (G : Type u_2) [group G] [fintype G] (R : Type u_3) [comm_ring R] [mul_semiring_action G R] (x : R) (g : G) : g • prod_X_sub_smul G R x = prod_X_sub_smul G R x := sorry
theorem prod_X_sub_smul.coeff (G : Type u_2) [group G] [fintype G] (R : Type u_3) [comm_ring R] [mul_semiring_action G R] (x : R) (g : G) (n : ℕ) : g • polynomial.coeff (prod_X_sub_smul G R x) n = polynomial.coeff (prod_X_sub_smul G R x) n := sorry
namespace mul_semiring_action_hom
/-- An equivariant map induces an equivariant map on polynomials. -/
protected def polynomial {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] {P : Type u_2} [comm_semiring P] [mul_semiring_action M P] {Q : Type u_3} [comm_semiring Q] [mul_semiring_action M Q] (g : mul_semiring_action_hom M P Q) : mul_semiring_action_hom M (polynomial P) (polynomial Q) :=
mk (polynomial.map ↑g) sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem coe_polynomial {M : Type u_1} [monoid M] {P : Type u_2} [comm_semiring P] [mul_semiring_action M P] {Q : Type u_3} [comm_semiring Q] [mul_semiring_action M Q] (g : mul_semiring_action_hom M P Q) : ⇑(mul_semiring_action_hom.polynomial g) = polynomial.map ↑g :=
rfl
|
eee9eff0b6396ccc3f08fb244a83ca38ed3b9ad1 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/data/list/intervals.lean | 0ece01cfaa3efc67fb2549fac8e76701630873a8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,845 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.list.lattice
import data.list.range
/-!
# Intervals in ℕ
This file defines intervals of naturals. `list.Ico m n` is the list of integers greater than `m`
and strictly less than `n`.
## TODO
- Define `Ioo` and `Icc`, state basic lemmas about them.
- Also do the versions for integers?
- One could generalise even further, defining 'locally finite partial orders', for which
`set.Ico a b` is `[finite]`, and 'locally finite total orders', for which there is a list model.
- Once the above is done, get rid of `data.int.range` (and maybe `list.range'`?).
-/
open nat
namespace list
/--
`Ico n m` is the list of natural numbers `n ≤ x < m`.
(Ico stands for "interval, closed-open".)
See also `data/set/intervals.lean` for `set.Ico`, modelling intervals in general preorders, and
`multiset.Ico` and `finset.Ico` for `n ≤ x < m` as a multiset or as a finset.
-/
def Ico (n m : ℕ) : list ℕ := range' n (m - n)
namespace Ico
theorem zero_bot (n : ℕ) : Ico 0 n = range n :=
by rw [Ico, tsub_zero, range_eq_range']
@[simp] theorem length (n m : ℕ) : length (Ico n m) = m - n :=
by { dsimp [Ico], simp only [length_range'] }
theorem pairwise_lt (n m : ℕ) : pairwise (<) (Ico n m) :=
by { dsimp [Ico], simp only [pairwise_lt_range'] }
theorem nodup (n m : ℕ) : nodup (Ico n m) :=
by { dsimp [Ico], simp only [nodup_range'] }
@[simp] theorem mem {n m l : ℕ} : l ∈ Ico n m ↔ n ≤ l ∧ l < m :=
suffices n ≤ l ∧ l < n + (m - n) ↔ n ≤ l ∧ l < m, by simp [Ico, this],
begin
cases le_total n m with hnm hmn,
{ rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le hnm] },
{ rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hmn, add_zero],
exact and_congr_right (assume hnl, iff.intro
(assume hln, (not_le_of_gt hln hnl).elim)
(assume hlm, lt_of_lt_of_le hlm hmn)) }
end
theorem eq_nil_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Ico n m = [] :=
by simp [Ico, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h]
theorem map_add (n m k : ℕ) : (Ico n m).map ((+) k) = Ico (n + k) (m + k) :=
by rw [Ico, Ico, map_add_range', add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_right, add_comm n k]
theorem map_sub (n m k : ℕ) (h₁ : k ≤ n) : (Ico n m).map (λ x, x - k) = Ico (n - k) (m - k) :=
by rw [Ico, Ico, tsub_tsub_tsub_cancel_right h₁, map_sub_range' _ _ _ h₁]
@[simp] theorem self_empty {n : ℕ} : Ico n n = [] :=
eq_nil_of_le (le_refl n)
@[simp] theorem eq_empty_iff {n m : ℕ} : Ico n m = [] ↔ m ≤ n :=
iff.intro (assume h, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp $ by rw [← length, h, list.length]) eq_nil_of_le
lemma append_consecutive {n m l : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (hml : m ≤ l) :
Ico n m ++ Ico m l = Ico n l :=
begin
dunfold Ico,
convert range'_append _ _ _,
{ exact (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hnm).symm },
{ rwa [← add_tsub_assoc_of_le hnm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le] }
end
@[simp] lemma inter_consecutive (n m l : ℕ) : Ico n m ∩ Ico m l = [] :=
begin
apply eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.2,
intro a,
simp only [and_imp, not_and, not_lt, list.mem_inter, list.Ico.mem],
intros h₁ h₂ h₃,
exfalso,
exact not_lt_of_ge h₃ h₂
end
@[simp] lemma bag_inter_consecutive (n m l : ℕ) : list.bag_inter (Ico n m) (Ico m l) = [] :=
(bag_inter_nil_iff_inter_nil _ _).2 (inter_consecutive n m l)
@[simp] theorem succ_singleton {n : ℕ} : Ico n (n+1) = [n] :=
by { dsimp [Ico], simp [add_tsub_cancel_left] }
theorem succ_top {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : Ico n (m + 1) = Ico n m ++ [m] :=
by { rwa [← succ_singleton, append_consecutive], exact nat.le_succ _ }
theorem eq_cons {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : Ico n m = n :: Ico (n + 1) m :=
by { rw [← append_consecutive (nat.le_succ n) h, succ_singleton], refl }
@[simp] theorem pred_singleton {m : ℕ} (h : 0 < m) : Ico (m - 1) m = [m - 1] :=
by { dsimp [Ico], rw tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt h), simp }
theorem chain'_succ (n m : ℕ) : chain' (λa b, b = succ a) (Ico n m) :=
begin
by_cases n < m,
{ rw [eq_cons h], exact chain_succ_range' _ _ },
{ rw [eq_nil_of_le (le_of_not_gt h)], trivial }
end
@[simp] theorem not_mem_top {n m : ℕ} : m ∉ Ico n m :=
by simp
lemma filter_lt_of_top_le {n m l : ℕ} (hml : m ≤ l) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < l) = Ico n m :=
filter_eq_self.2 $ assume k hk, lt_of_lt_of_le (mem.1 hk).2 hml
lemma filter_lt_of_le_bot {n m l : ℕ} (hln : l ≤ n) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < l) = [] :=
filter_eq_nil.2 $ assume k hk, not_lt_of_le $ le_trans hln $ (mem.1 hk).1
lemma filter_lt_of_ge {n m l : ℕ} (hlm : l ≤ m) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < l) = Ico n l :=
begin
cases le_total n l with hnl hln,
{ rw [← append_consecutive hnl hlm, filter_append,
filter_lt_of_top_le (le_refl l), filter_lt_of_le_bot (le_refl l), append_nil] },
{ rw [eq_nil_of_le hln, filter_lt_of_le_bot hln] }
end
@[simp] lemma filter_lt (n m l : ℕ) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < l) = Ico n (min m l) :=
begin
cases le_total m l with hml hlm,
{ rw [min_eq_left hml, filter_lt_of_top_le hml] },
{ rw [min_eq_right hlm, filter_lt_of_ge hlm] }
end
lemma filter_le_of_le_bot {n m l : ℕ} (hln : l ≤ n) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, l ≤ x) = Ico n m :=
filter_eq_self.2 $ assume k hk, le_trans hln (mem.1 hk).1
lemma filter_le_of_top_le {n m l : ℕ} (hml : m ≤ l) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, l ≤ x) = [] :=
filter_eq_nil.2 $ assume k hk, not_le_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem.1 hk).2 hml)
lemma filter_le_of_le {n m l : ℕ} (hnl : n ≤ l) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, l ≤ x) = Ico l m :=
begin
cases le_total l m with hlm hml,
{ rw [← append_consecutive hnl hlm, filter_append,
filter_le_of_top_le (le_refl l), filter_le_of_le_bot (le_refl l), nil_append] },
{ rw [eq_nil_of_le hml, filter_le_of_top_le hml] }
end
@[simp] lemma filter_le (n m l : ℕ) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, l ≤ x) = Ico (max n l) m :=
begin
cases le_total n l with hnl hln,
{ rw [max_eq_right hnl, filter_le_of_le hnl] },
{ rw [max_eq_left hln, filter_le_of_le_bot hln] }
end
lemma filter_lt_of_succ_bot {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n < m) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x < n + 1) = [n] :=
begin
have r : min m (n + 1) = n + 1 := (@inf_eq_right _ _ m (n + 1)).mpr hnm,
simp [filter_lt n m (n + 1), r],
end
@[simp] lemma filter_le_of_bot {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n < m) : (Ico n m).filter (λ x, x ≤ n) = [n] :=
begin
rw ←filter_lt_of_succ_bot hnm,
exact filter_congr' (λ _ _, lt_succ_iff.symm),
end
/--
For any natural numbers n, a, and b, one of the following holds:
1. n < a
2. n ≥ b
3. n ∈ Ico a b
-/
lemma trichotomy (n a b : ℕ) : n < a ∨ b ≤ n ∨ n ∈ Ico a b :=
begin
by_cases h₁ : n < a,
{ left, exact h₁ },
{ right,
by_cases h₂ : n ∈ Ico a b,
{ right, exact h₂ },
{ left, simp only [Ico.mem, not_and, not_lt] at *, exact h₂ h₁ }}
end
end Ico
end list
|
1939b19d15a272895f121c3753a132a3420e018e | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/geometry/euclidean/circumcenter.lean | ca0e0f316a333a77fc8d4ee45a107c38637ea34d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 38,384 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import geometry.euclidean.basic
import linear_algebra.affine_space.finite_dimensional
import tactic.derive_fintype
/-!
# Circumcenter and circumradius
This file proves some lemmas on points equidistant from a set of
points, and defines the circumradius and circumcenter of a simplex.
There are also some definitions for use in calculations where it is
convenient to work with affine combinations of vertices together with
the circumcenter.
## Main definitions
* `circumcenter` and `circumradius` are the circumcenter and
circumradius of a simplex.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumscribed_circle
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators
open_locale classical
open_locale real
open_locale real_inner_product_space
namespace euclidean_geometry
open inner_product_geometry
variables {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
[normed_add_torsor V P]
include V
open affine_subspace
/-- `p` is equidistant from two points in `s` if and only if its
`orthogonal_projection` is. -/
lemma dist_eq_iff_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {p1 p2 : P} (p3 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
dist p1 p3 = dist p2 p3 ↔
dist p1 (orthogonal_projection s p3) = dist p2 (orthogonal_projection s p3) :=
begin
rw [←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg,
←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg,
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq
p3 hp1,
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq
p3 hp2],
simp
end
/-- `p` is equidistant from a set of points in `s` if and only if its
`orthogonal_projection` is. -/
lemma dist_set_eq_iff_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {ps : set P} (hps : ps ⊆ s) (p : P) :
(set.pairwise_on ps (λ p1 p2, dist p1 p = dist p2 p) ↔
(set.pairwise_on ps (λ p1 p2, dist p1 (orthogonal_projection s p) =
dist p2 (orthogonal_projection s p)))) :=
⟨λ h p1 hp1 p2 hp2 hne,
(dist_eq_iff_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq p (hps hp1) (hps hp2)).1 (h p1 hp1 p2 hp2 hne),
λ h p1 hp1 p2 hp2 hne,
(dist_eq_iff_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq p (hps hp1) (hps hp2)).2 (h p1 hp1 p2 hp2 hne)⟩
/-- There exists `r` such that `p` has distance `r` from all the
points of a set of points in `s` if and only if there exists (possibly
different) `r` such that its `orthogonal_projection` has that distance
from all the points in that set. -/
lemma exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} [nonempty s]
[complete_space s.direction] {ps : set P} (hps : ps ⊆ s) (p : P) :
(∃ r, ∀ p1 ∈ ps, dist p1 p = r) ↔
∃ r, ∀ p1 ∈ ps, dist p1 ↑(orthogonal_projection s p) = r :=
begin
have h := dist_set_eq_iff_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq hps p,
simp_rw set.pairwise_on_eq_iff_exists_eq at h,
exact h
end
/-- The induction step for the existence and uniqueness of the
circumcenter. Given a nonempty set of points in a nonempty affine
subspace whose direction is complete, such that there is a unique
(circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points in that subspace,
and a point `p` not in that subspace, there is a unique (circumcenter,
circumradius) pair for the set with `p` added, in the span of the
subspace with `p` added. -/
lemma exists_unique_dist_eq_of_insert {s : affine_subspace ℝ P}
[complete_space s.direction] {ps : set P} (hnps : ps.nonempty) {p : P}
(hps : ps ⊆ s) (hp : p ∉ s)
(hu : ∃! cccr : (P × ℝ), cccr.fst ∈ s ∧ ∀ p1 ∈ ps, dist p1 cccr.fst = cccr.snd) :
∃! cccr₂ : (P × ℝ), cccr₂.fst ∈ affine_span ℝ (insert p (s : set P)) ∧
∀ p1 ∈ insert p ps, dist p1 cccr₂.fst = cccr₂.snd :=
begin
haveI : nonempty s := set.nonempty.to_subtype (hnps.mono hps),
rcases hu with ⟨⟨cc, cr⟩, ⟨hcc, hcr⟩, hcccru⟩,
simp only [prod.fst, prod.snd] at hcc hcr hcccru,
let x := dist cc (orthogonal_projection s p),
let y := dist p (orthogonal_projection s p),
have hy0 : y ≠ 0 := dist_orthogonal_projection_ne_zero_of_not_mem hp,
let ycc₂ := (x * x + y * y - cr * cr) / (2 * y),
let cc₂ := (ycc₂ / y) • (p -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p : V) +ᵥ cc,
let cr₂ := real.sqrt (cr * cr + ycc₂ * ycc₂),
use (cc₂, cr₂),
simp only [prod.fst, prod.snd],
have hpo : p = (1 : ℝ) • (p -ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p : V) +ᵥ orthogonal_projection s p,
{ simp },
split,
{ split,
{ refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction _ (mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hcc)),
rw direction_affine_span,
exact submodule.smul_mem _ _
(vsub_mem_vector_span ℝ (set.mem_insert _ _)
(set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (orthogonal_projection_mem _))) },
{ intros p1 hp1,
rw [←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (real.sqrt_nonneg _),
real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))],
cases hp1,
{ rw hp1,
rw [hpo,
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd
(orthogonal_projection_mem p) hcc _ _
(vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
←dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, dist_comm _ cc],
field_simp [hy0],
ring },
{ rw [dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq
_ (hps hp1),
orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection _ _ hcc, subtype.coe_mk,
hcr _ hp1, dist_eq_norm_vsub V cc₂ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←dist_eq_norm_vsub V,
real.norm_eq_abs, abs_div, abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg, div_mul_cancel _ hy0,
abs_mul_abs_self] } } },
{ rintros ⟨cc₃, cr₃⟩ ⟨hcc₃, hcr₃⟩,
simp only [prod.fst, prod.snd] at hcc₃ hcr₃,
obtain ⟨t₃, cc₃', hcc₃', hcc₃''⟩ :
∃ (r : ℝ) (p0 : P) (hp0 : p0 ∈ s), cc₃ = r • (p -ᵥ ↑((orthogonal_projection s) p)) +ᵥ p0,
{ rwa mem_affine_span_insert_iff (orthogonal_projection_mem p) at hcc₃ },
have hcr₃' : ∃ r, ∀ p1 ∈ ps, dist p1 cc₃ = r :=
⟨cr₃, λ p1 hp1, hcr₃ p1 (set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp1)⟩,
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq hps cc₃, hcc₃'',
orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection _ _ hcc₃'] at hcr₃',
cases hcr₃' with cr₃' hcr₃',
have hu := hcccru (cc₃', cr₃'),
simp only [prod.fst, prod.snd] at hu,
replace hu := hu ⟨hcc₃', hcr₃'⟩,
rw prod.ext_iff at hu,
simp only [prod.fst, prod.snd] at hu,
cases hu with hucc hucr,
substs hucc hucr,
have hcr₃val : cr₃ = real.sqrt (cr₃' * cr₃' + (t₃ * y) * (t₃ * y)),
{ cases hnps with p0 hp0,
have h' : ↑(⟨cc₃', hcc₃'⟩ : s) = cc₃' := rfl,
rw [←hcr₃ p0 (set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp0), hcc₃'',
←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (real.sqrt_nonneg _),
real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)),
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq
_ (hps hp0),
orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection _ _ hcc₃', h', hcr p0 hp0,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ cc₃', vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←dist_eq_norm_vsub V p,
real.norm_eq_abs, ←mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (abs t₃), ←mul_assoc, abs_mul_abs_self],
ring },
replace hcr₃ := hcr₃ p (set.mem_insert _ _),
rw [hpo, hcc₃'', hcr₃val, ←mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (real.sqrt_nonneg _),
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd
(orthogonal_projection_mem p) hcc₃' _ _
(vsub_orthogonal_projection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
dist_comm, ←dist_eq_norm_vsub V p,
real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))] at hcr₃,
change x * x + _ * (y * y) = _ at hcr₃,
rw [(show x * x + (1 - t₃) * (1 - t₃) * (y * y) =
x * x + y * y - 2 * y * (t₃ * y) + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y), by ring), add_left_inj] at hcr₃,
have ht₃ : t₃ = ycc₂ / y,
{ field_simp [←hcr₃, hy0],
ring },
subst ht₃,
change cc₃ = cc₂ at hcc₃'',
congr',
rw hcr₃val,
congr' 2,
field_simp [hy0],
ring }
end
/-- Given a finite nonempty affinely independent family of points,
there is a unique (circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points
in the affine subspace they span. -/
lemma exists_unique_dist_eq_of_affine_independent {ι : Type*} [hne : nonempty ι] [fintype ι]
{p : ι → P} (ha : affine_independent ℝ p) :
∃! cccr : (P × ℝ), cccr.fst ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range p) ∧
∀ i, dist (p i) cccr.fst = cccr.snd :=
begin
generalize' hn : fintype.card ι = n,
unfreezingI { induction n with m hm generalizing ι },
{ exfalso,
have h := fintype.card_pos_iff.2 hne,
rw hn at h,
exact lt_irrefl 0 h },
{ cases m,
{ rw fintype.card_eq_one_iff at hn,
cases hn with i hi,
haveI : unique ι := ⟨⟨i⟩, hi⟩,
use (p i, 0),
simp only [prod.fst, prod.snd, set.range_unique, affine_subspace.mem_affine_span_singleton],
split,
{ simp_rw [hi (default ι)],
use rfl,
intro i1,
rw hi i1,
exact dist_self _ },
{ rintros ⟨cc, cr⟩,
simp only [prod.fst, prod.snd],
rintros ⟨rfl, hdist⟩,
rw hi (default ι),
congr',
rw ←hdist (default ι),
exact dist_self _ } },
{ have i := hne.some,
let ι2 := {x // x ≠ i},
have hc : fintype.card ι2 = m + 1,
{ rw fintype.card_of_subtype (finset.univ.filter (λ x, x ≠ i)),
{ rw finset.filter_not,
simp_rw eq_comm,
rw [finset.filter_eq, if_pos (finset.mem_univ _),
finset.card_sdiff (finset.subset_univ _), finset.card_singleton, finset.card_univ,
hn],
simp },
{ simp } },
haveI : nonempty ι2 := fintype.card_pos_iff.1 (hc.symm ▸ nat.zero_lt_succ _),
have ha2 : affine_independent ℝ (λ i2 : ι2, p i2) :=
affine_independent_subtype_of_affine_independent ha _,
replace hm := hm ha2 hc,
have hr : set.range p = insert (p i) (set.range (λ i2 : ι2, p i2)),
{ change _ = insert _ (set.range (λ i2 : {x | x ≠ i}, p i2)),
rw [←set.image_eq_range, ←set.image_univ, ←set.image_insert_eq],
congr' with j,
simp [classical.em] },
change ∃! (cccr : P × ℝ), (_ ∧ ∀ i2, (λ q, dist q cccr.fst = cccr.snd) (p i2)),
conv { congr, funext, conv { congr, skip, rw ←set.forall_range_iff } },
dsimp only,
rw hr,
change ∃! (cccr : P × ℝ), (_ ∧ ∀ (i2 : ι2), (λ q, dist q cccr.fst = cccr.snd) (p i2)) at hm,
conv at hm { congr, funext, conv { congr, skip, rw ←set.forall_range_iff } },
rw ←affine_span_insert_affine_span,
refine exists_unique_dist_eq_of_insert
(set.range_nonempty _)
(subset_span_points ℝ _)
_
hm,
convert not_mem_affine_span_diff_of_affine_independent ha i set.univ,
change set.range (λ i2 : {x | x ≠ i}, p i2) = _,
rw ←set.image_eq_range,
congr' with j, simp, refl } }
end
end euclidean_geometry
namespace affine
namespace simplex
open finset affine_subspace euclidean_geometry
variables {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
[normed_add_torsor V P]
include V
/-- The pair (circumcenter, circumradius) of a simplex. -/
def circumcenter_circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) : (P × ℝ) :=
(exists_unique_dist_eq_of_affine_independent s.independent).some
/-- The property satisfied by the (circumcenter, circumradius) pair. -/
lemma circumcenter_circumradius_unique_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) :
(s.circumcenter_circumradius.fst ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points) ∧
∀ i, dist (s.points i) s.circumcenter_circumradius.fst = s.circumcenter_circumradius.snd) ∧
(∀ cccr : (P × ℝ), (cccr.fst ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points) ∧
∀ i, dist (s.points i) cccr.fst = cccr.snd) → cccr = s.circumcenter_circumradius) :=
(exists_unique_dist_eq_of_affine_independent s.independent).some_spec
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex. -/
def circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
s.circumcenter_circumradius.fst
/-- The circumradius of a simplex. -/
def circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) : ℝ :=
s.circumcenter_circumradius.snd
/-- The circumcenter lies in the affine span. -/
lemma circumcenter_mem_affine_span {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points) :=
s.circumcenter_circumradius_unique_dist_eq.1.1
/-- All points have distance from the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp] lemma dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) :
∀ i, dist (s.points i) s.circumcenter = s.circumradius :=
s.circumcenter_circumradius_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- All points have distance to the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp] lemma dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) :
∀ i, dist s.circumcenter (s.points i) = s.circumradius :=
begin
intro i,
rw dist_comm,
exact dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ _
end
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that point is the circumcenter. -/
lemma eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
p = s.circumcenter :=
begin
have h := s.circumcenter_circumradius_unique_dist_eq.2 (p, r),
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, prod.ext_iff] at h,
exact h.1
end
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that distance is the circumradius. -/
lemma eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
r = s.circumradius :=
begin
have h := s.circumcenter_circumradius_unique_dist_eq.2 (p, r),
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, prod.ext_iff] at h,
exact h.2
end
/-- The circumradius is non-negative. -/
lemma circumradius_nonneg {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) : 0 ≤ s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius 0 ▸ dist_nonneg
/-- The circumradius of a simplex with at least two points is
positive. -/
lemma circumradius_pos {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) : 0 < s.circumradius :=
begin
refine lt_of_le_of_ne s.circumradius_nonneg _,
intro h,
have hr := s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius,
simp_rw [←h, dist_eq_zero] at hr,
have h01 := (injective_of_affine_independent s.independent).ne
(dec_trivial : (0 : fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1),
simpa [hr] using h01
end
/-- The circumcenter of a 0-simplex equals its unique point. -/
lemma circumcenter_eq_point (s : simplex ℝ P 0) (i : fin 1) :
s.circumcenter = s.points i :=
begin
have h := s.circumcenter_mem_affine_span,
rw [set.range_unique, mem_affine_span_singleton] at h,
rw h,
congr
end
/-- The circumcenter of a 1-simplex equals its centroid. -/
lemma circumcenter_eq_centroid (s : simplex ℝ P 1) :
s.circumcenter = finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points :=
begin
have hr : set.pairwise_on set.univ
(λ i j : fin 2, dist (s.points i) (finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) =
dist (s.points j) (finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points)),
{ intros i hi j hj hij,
rw [finset.centroid_insert_singleton_fin, dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points i),
dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points j), vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub,
←one_smul ℝ (s.points i -ᵥ s.points 0), ←one_smul ℝ (s.points j -ᵥ s.points 0)],
fin_cases i; fin_cases j; simp [-one_smul, ←sub_smul]; norm_num },
rw set.pairwise_on_eq_iff_exists_eq at hr,
cases hr with r hr,
exact (s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
(centroid_mem_affine_span_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (finset.card_fin 2))
(λ i, hr i (set.mem_univ _))).symm
end
/-- If there exists a distance that a point has from all vertices of a
simplex, the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace
spanned by that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n)
{p : P} (hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
↑(orthogonal_projection (affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points)) p) = s.circumcenter :=
begin
change ∃ r : ℝ, ∀ i, (λ x, dist x p = r) (s.points i) at hr,
conv at hr { congr, funext, rw ←set.forall_range_iff },
rw exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq (subset_affine_span ℝ _) p at hr,
cases hr with r hr,
exact s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
(orthogonal_projection_mem p) (λ i, hr _ (set.mem_range_self i)),
end
/-- If a point has the same distance from all vertices of a simplex,
the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace spanned by
that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
{r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
↑(orthogonal_projection (affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points)) p) = s.circumcenter :=
s.orthogonal_projection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq ⟨r, hr⟩
/-- The orthogonal projection of the circumcenter onto a face is the
circumcenter of that face. -/
lemma orthogonal_projection_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) {fs : finset (fin (n + 1))}
{m : ℕ} (h : fs.card = m + 1) :
↑(orthogonal_projection (affine_span ℝ (set.range (s.face h).points)) s.circumcenter) =
(s.face h).circumcenter :=
begin
have hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist ((s.face h).points i) s.circumcenter = r,
{ use s.circumradius,
simp [face_points] },
exact orthogonal_projection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq _ hr
end
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same circumcenter. -/
lemma circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : simplex ℝ P n}
(h : set.range s₁.points = set.range s₂.points) : s₁.circumcenter = s₂.circumcenter :=
begin
have hs : s₁.circumcenter ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range s₂.points) :=
h ▸ s₁.circumcenter_mem_affine_span,
have hr : ∀ i, dist (s₂.points i) s₁.circumcenter = s₁.circumradius,
{ intro i,
have hi : s₂.points i ∈ set.range s₂.points := set.mem_range_self _,
rw [←h, set.mem_range] at hi,
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj⟩,
rw [←hj, s₁.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius j] },
exact s₂.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq hs hr
end
omit V
/-- An index type for the vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter.
This is for use in calculations where it is convenient to work with
affine combinations of vertices together with the circumcenter. (An
equivalent form sometimes used in the literature is placing the
circumcenter at the origin and working with vectors for the vertices.) -/
@[derive fintype]
inductive points_with_circumcenter_index (n : ℕ)
| point_index : fin (n + 1) → points_with_circumcenter_index
| circumcenter_index : points_with_circumcenter_index
open points_with_circumcenter_index
instance points_with_circumcenter_index_inhabited (n : ℕ) :
inhabited (points_with_circumcenter_index n) :=
⟨circumcenter_index⟩
/-- `point_index` as an embedding. -/
def point_index_embedding (n : ℕ) : fin (n + 1) ↪ points_with_circumcenter_index n :=
⟨λ i, point_index i, λ _ _ h, by injection h⟩
/-- The sum of a function over `points_with_circumcenter_index`. -/
lemma sum_points_with_circumcenter {α : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α] {n : ℕ}
(f : points_with_circumcenter_index n → α) :
∑ i, f i = (∑ (i : fin (n + 1)), f (point_index i)) + f circumcenter_index :=
begin
have h : univ = insert circumcenter_index (univ.map (point_index_embedding n)),
{ ext x,
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ _, mem_univ _⟩,
cases x with i,
{ exact mem_insert_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem _ (mem_univ i)) },
{ exact mem_insert_self _ _ } },
change _ = ∑ i, f (point_index_embedding n i) + _,
rw [add_comm, h, ←sum_map, sum_insert],
simp_rw [mem_map, not_exists],
intros x hx h,
injection h
end
include V
/-- The vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter. -/
def points_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) : points_with_circumcenter_index n → P
| (point_index i) := s.points i
| circumcenter_index := s.circumcenter
/-- `points_with_circumcenter`, applied to a `point_index` value,
equals `points` applied to that value. -/
@[simp] lemma points_with_circumcenter_point {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) (i : fin (n + 1)) :
s.points_with_circumcenter (point_index i) = s.points i :=
rfl
/-- `points_with_circumcenter`, applied to `circumcenter_index`, equals the
circumcenter. -/
@[simp] lemma points_with_circumcenter_eq_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n) :
s.points_with_circumcenter circumcenter_index = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
omit V
/-- The weights for a single vertex of a simplex, in terms of
`points_with_circumcenter`. -/
def point_weights_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : fin (n + 1)) : points_with_circumcenter_index n → ℝ
| (point_index j) := if j = i then 1 else 0
| circumcenter_index := 0
/-- `point_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp] lemma sum_point_weights_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : fin (n + 1)) :
∑ j, point_weights_with_circumcenter i j = 1 :=
begin
convert sum_ite_eq' univ (point_index i) (function.const _ (1 : ℝ)),
{ ext j,
cases j ; simp [point_weights_with_circumcenter] },
{ simp }
end
include V
/-- A single vertex, in terms of `points_with_circumcenter`. -/
lemma point_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n)
(i : fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i =
(univ : finset (points_with_circumcenter_index n)).affine_combination
s.points_with_circumcenter (point_weights_with_circumcenter i) :=
begin
rw ←points_with_circumcenter_point,
symmetry,
refine affine_combination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _
(mem_univ _)
(by simp [point_weights_with_circumcenter])
_,
intros i hi hn,
cases i,
{ have h : i_1 ≠ i := λ h, hn (h ▸ rfl),
simp [point_weights_with_circumcenter, h] },
{ refl }
end
omit V
/-- The weights for the centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in
terms of `points_with_circumcenter`. -/
def centroid_weights_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (fs : finset (fin (n + 1)))
: points_with_circumcenter_index n → ℝ
| (point_index i) := if i ∈ fs then ((card fs : ℝ) ⁻¹) else 0
| circumcenter_index := 0
/-- `centroid_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1, if the `finset` is
nonempty. -/
@[simp] lemma sum_centroid_weights_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} {fs : finset (fin (n + 1))}
(h : fs.nonempty) :
∑ i, centroid_weights_with_circumcenter fs i = 1 :=
begin
simp_rw [sum_points_with_circumcenter, centroid_weights_with_circumcenter, add_zero,
←fs.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_nonempty ℝ h,
set.sum_indicator_subset _ fs.subset_univ],
rcongr
end
include V
/-- The centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in terms of
`points_with_circumcenter`. -/
lemma centroid_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : simplex ℝ P n)
(fs : finset (fin (n + 1))) :
fs.centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : finset (points_with_circumcenter_index n)).affine_combination
s.points_with_circumcenter (centroid_weights_with_circumcenter fs) :=
begin
simp_rw [centroid_def, affine_combination_apply,
weighted_vsub_of_point_apply, sum_points_with_circumcenter,
centroid_weights_with_circumcenter, points_with_circumcenter_point, zero_smul,
add_zero, centroid_weights,
set.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero
(function.const (fin (n + 1)) ((card fs : ℝ)⁻¹))
(λ i wi, wi • (s.points i -ᵥ classical.choice add_torsor.nonempty))
fs.subset_univ
(λ i, zero_smul ℝ _),
set.indicator_apply],
congr, funext, congr' 2
end
omit V
/-- The weights for the circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of
`points_with_circumcenter`. -/
def circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter (n : ℕ) : points_with_circumcenter_index n → ℝ
| (point_index i) := 0
| circumcenter_index := 1
/-- `circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp] lemma sum_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter n i = 1 :=
begin
convert sum_ite_eq' univ circumcenter_index (function.const _ (1 : ℝ)),
{ ext ⟨j⟩ ; simp [circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter] },
{ simp }
end
include V
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of
`points_with_circumcenter`. -/
lemma circumcenter_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter = (univ : finset (points_with_circumcenter_index n)).affine_combination
s.points_with_circumcenter (circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter n) :=
begin
rw ←points_with_circumcenter_eq_circumcenter,
symmetry,
refine affine_combination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _) rfl _,
rintros ⟨i⟩ hi hn ; tauto
end
omit V
/-- The weights for the reflection of the circumcenter in an edge of a
simplex. This definition is only valid with `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 1)) :
points_with_circumcenter_index n → ℝ
| (point_index i) := if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then 1 else 0
| circumcenter_index := -1
/-- `reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp] lemma sum_reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 1)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : ∑ i, reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 1 :=
begin
simp_rw [sum_points_with_circumcenter, reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter,
sum_ite, sum_const, filter_or, filter_eq'],
rw card_union_eq,
{ simp },
{ simp [h.symm] }
end
include V
/-- The reflection of the circumcenter of a simplex in an edge, in
terms of `points_with_circumcenter`. -/
lemma reflection_circumcenter_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : simplex ℝ P n) {i₁ i₂ : fin (n + 1)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
reflection (affine_span ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})) s.circumcenter =
(univ : finset (points_with_circumcenter_index n)).affine_combination
s.points_with_circumcenter (reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter i₁ i₂) :=
begin
have hc : card ({i₁, i₂} : finset (fin (n + 1))) = 2,
{ simp [h] },
have h_faces : ↑(orthogonal_projection (affine_span ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})) s.circumcenter)
= ↑(orthogonal_projection (affine_span ℝ (set.range (s.face hc).points)) s.circumcenter),
{ apply eq_orthogonal_projection_of_eq_subspace,
simp },
rw [reflection_apply, h_faces, s.orthogonal_projection_circumcenter hc, circumcenter_eq_centroid,
s.face_centroid_eq_centroid hc, centroid_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affine_combination_of_points_with_circumcenter, ←@vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
affine_combination_vsub, weighted_vsub_vadd_affine_combination, affine_combination_vsub,
weighted_vsub_apply, sum_points_with_circumcenter],
simp_rw [pi.sub_apply, pi.add_apply, pi.sub_apply, sub_smul, add_smul, sub_smul,
centroid_weights_with_circumcenter, circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter,
reflection_circumcenter_weights_with_circumcenter, ite_smul, zero_smul, sub_zero,
apply_ite2 (+), add_zero, ←add_smul, hc, zero_sub, neg_smul, sub_self, add_zero],
convert sum_const_zero,
norm_num
end
end simplex
end affine
namespace euclidean_geometry
open affine affine_subspace finite_dimensional
variables {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [inner_product_space ℝ V] [metric_space P]
[normed_add_torsor V P]
include V
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is complete,
that contains a set of points, those points are cospherical if and
only if they are equidistant from some point in that subspace. -/
lemma cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} {ps : set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[nonempty s] [complete_space s.direction] :
cospherical ps ↔ ∃ (center ∈ s) (radius : ℝ), ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨c, hcr⟩,
rw exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonal_projection_eq h c at hcr,
exact ⟨orthogonal_projection s c, orthogonal_projection_mem _, hcr⟩ },
{ exact λ ⟨c, hc, hd⟩, ⟨c, hd⟩ }
end
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is
finite-dimensional, that contains a set of points, those points are
cospherical if and only if they are equidistant from some point in
that subspace. -/
lemma cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finite_dimensional {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} {ps : set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [nonempty s] [finite_dimensional ℝ s.direction] :
cospherical ps ↔ ∃ (center ∈ s) (radius : ℝ), ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius :=
cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete h
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumradius. -/
lemma exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} {ps : set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [finite_dimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : cospherical ps) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ sx : simplex ℝ P n, set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumradius = r :=
begin
rw cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finite_dimensional h at hc,
rcases hc with ⟨c, hc, r, hcr⟩,
use r,
intros sx hsxps,
have hsx : affine_span ℝ (set.range sx.points) = s,
{ refine affine_span_eq_of_le_of_affine_independent_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one sx.independent
(span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.subset.trans hsxps h)) _,
simp [hd] },
have hc : c ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range sx.points) := hsx.symm ▸ hc,
exact (sx.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq
hc
(λ i, hcr (sx.points i) (hsxps (set.mem_range_self i)))).symm
end
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumradius. -/
lemma circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} {ps : set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [finite_dimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumradius = sx₂.circumradius :=
begin
rcases exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩,
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
end
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumradius. -/
lemma exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical {ps : set P} {n : ℕ} [finite_dimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : cospherical ps) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ sx : simplex ℝ P n, set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumradius = r :=
begin
haveI : nonempty (⊤ : affine_subspace ℝ P) := set.univ.nonempty,
rw [←finrank_top, ←direction_top ℝ V P] at hd,
refine exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset _ hd hc,
exact set.subset_univ _
end
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumradius. -/
lemma circumradius_eq_of_cospherical {ps : set P} {n : ℕ} [finite_dimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumradius = sx₂.circumradius :=
begin
rcases exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩,
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
end
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumcenter. -/
lemma exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} {ps : set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [finite_dimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : cospherical ps) :
∃ c : P, ∀ sx : simplex ℝ P n, set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumcenter = c :=
begin
rw cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finite_dimensional h at hc,
rcases hc with ⟨c, hc, r, hcr⟩,
use c,
intros sx hsxps,
have hsx : affine_span ℝ (set.range sx.points) = s,
{ refine affine_span_eq_of_le_of_affine_independent_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one sx.independent
(span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.subset.trans hsxps h)) _,
simp [hd] },
have hc : c ∈ affine_span ℝ (set.range sx.points) := hsx.symm ▸ hc,
exact (sx.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
hc
(λ i, hcr (sx.points i) (hsxps (set.mem_range_self i)))).symm
end
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumcenter. -/
lemma circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : affine_subspace ℝ P} {ps : set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [finite_dimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumcenter = sx₂.circumcenter :=
begin
rcases exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩,
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
end
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumcenter. -/
lemma exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical {ps : set P} {n : ℕ} [finite_dimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : cospherical ps) :
∃ c : P, ∀ sx : simplex ℝ P n, set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumcenter = c :=
begin
haveI : nonempty (⊤ : affine_subspace ℝ P) := set.univ.nonempty,
rw [←finrank_top, ←direction_top ℝ V P] at hd,
refine exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset _ hd hc,
exact set.subset_univ _
end
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumcenter. -/
lemma circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical {ps : set P} {n : ℕ} [finite_dimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumcenter = sx₂.circumcenter :=
begin
rcases exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩,
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
end
/-- Suppose all distances from `p₁` and `p₂` to the points of a
simplex are equal, and that `p₁` and `p₂` lie in the affine span of
`p` with the vertices of that simplex. Then `p₁` and `p₂` are equal
or reflections of each other in the affine span of the vertices of the
simplex. -/
lemma eq_or_eq_reflection_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} {s : simplex ℝ P n} {p p₁ p₂ : P} {r : ℝ}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ affine_span ℝ (insert p (set.range s.points)))
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ affine_span ℝ (insert p (set.range s.points)))
(h₁ : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p₁ = r) (h₂ : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p₂ = r) :
p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₁ = reflection (affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points)) p₂ :=
begin
let span_s := affine_span ℝ (set.range s.points),
have h₁' := s.orthogonal_projection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq h₁,
have h₂' := s.orthogonal_projection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq h₂,
have hn : (span_s : set P).nonempty := (affine_span_nonempty ℝ _).2 (set.range_nonempty _),
have hc : is_complete (span_s.direction : set V) := submodule.complete_of_finite_dimensional _,
rw [←affine_span_insert_affine_span,
mem_affine_span_insert_iff (orthogonal_projection_mem p)] at hp₁ hp₂,
obtain ⟨r₁, p₁o, hp₁o, hp₁⟩ := hp₁,
obtain ⟨r₂, p₂o, hp₂o, hp₂⟩ := hp₂,
obtain rfl : ↑(orthogonal_projection span_s p₁) = p₁o,
{ have := orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection _ _ hp₁o,
rw ← hp₁ at this,
rw this,
refl },
rw h₁' at hp₁,
obtain rfl : ↑(orthogonal_projection span_s p₂) = p₂o,
{ have := orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection _ _ hp₂o,
rw ← hp₂ at this,
rw this,
refl },
rw h₂' at hp₂,
have h : s.points 0 ∈ span_s := mem_affine_span ℝ (set.mem_range_self _),
have hd₁ : dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter =
r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius,
{ rw [dist_comm, ←h₁ 0,
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq p₁ h],
simp [h₁', dist_comm p₁] },
have hd₂ : dist p₂ s.circumcenter * dist p₂ s.circumcenter =
r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius,
{ rw [dist_comm, ←h₂ 0,
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq p₂ h],
simp [h₂', dist_comm p₂] },
rw [←hd₂, hp₁, hp₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ s.circumcenter,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ s.circumcenter, vadd_vsub, vadd_vsub, ←real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq,
←real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left,
real_inner_smul_right, real_inner_smul_right, ←mul_assoc, ←mul_assoc] at hd₁,
by_cases hp : p = orthogonal_projection span_s p,
{ rw [hp₁, hp₂, ←hp],
simp },
{ have hz : ⟪p -ᵥ orthogonal_projection span_s p, p -ᵥ orthogonal_projection span_s p⟫ ≠ 0,
{ simpa using hp },
rw [mul_left_inj' hz, mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff] at hd₁,
rw [hp₁, hp₂],
cases hd₁,
{ left,
rw hd₁ },
{ right,
rw [hd₁,
reflection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection p r₂ s.circumcenter_mem_affine_span,
neg_smul] } }
end
end euclidean_geometry
|
c00923e77a2134b0eab67b006b1d13fe154dcca9 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/1411.lean | 6800f1a8d73cab2a46540116eddf9648616fdb5a | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 153 | lean | namespace Lean
syntax "foo " binderIdent : term
example : Syntax → MacroM Syntax
| `(foo _) => `(_)
| `(foo $x:ident) => `($x:ident)
| _ => `(_)
|
649d29e9d6e5fa070be60e6badc856e43b73f3c1 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /test/monotonicity/test_cases.lean | 16d5ca3f288c40630a43440aa28c80515be592cc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,002 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Simon Hudon
-/
import tactic.monotonicity.interactive
open list tactic tactic.interactive
meta class elaborable (α : Type) (β : out_param Type) :=
(elaborate : α → tactic β)
export elaborable (elaborate)
meta instance : elaborable pexpr expr :=
⟨ to_expr ⟩
meta instance elaborable_list {α α'} [elaborable α α'] : elaborable (list α) (list α') :=
⟨ mmap elaborate ⟩
meta def mono_function.elaborate : mono_function ff → tactic mono_function
| (mono_function.non_assoc x y z) :=
mono_function.non_assoc <$> elaborate x
<*> elaborate y
<*> elaborate z
| (mono_function.assoc x y z) :=
mono_function.assoc <$> elaborate x
<*> traverse elaborate y
<*> traverse elaborate z
| (mono_function.assoc_comm x y) :=
mono_function.assoc_comm <$> elaborate x
<*> elaborate y
meta instance elaborable_mono_function : elaborable (mono_function ff) mono_function :=
⟨ mono_function.elaborate ⟩
meta instance prod_elaborable {α α' β β' : Type} [elaborable α α'] [elaborable β β']
: elaborable (α × β) (α' × β') :=
⟨ λ i, prod.rec_on i (λ x y, prod.mk <$> elaborate x <*> elaborate y) ⟩
meta def parse_mono_function' (l r : pexpr) :=
do l' ← to_expr l,
r' ← to_expr r,
parse_ac_mono_function { mono_cfg . } l' r'
run_cmd
do xs ← mmap to_expr [``(1),``(2),``(3)],
ys ← mmap to_expr [``(1),``(2),``(4)],
x ← match_prefix { unify := ff } xs ys,
p ← elaborate ([``(1),``(2)] , [``(3)], [``(4)]),
guard $ x = p
run_cmd
do xs ← mmap to_expr [``(1),``(2),``(3),``(6),``(7)],
ys ← mmap to_expr [``(1),``(2),``(4),``(5),``(6),``(7)],
x ← match_assoc { unify := ff } xs ys,
p ← elaborate ([``(1), ``(2)], [``(3)], ([``(4), ``(5)], [``(6), ``(7)])),
guard (x = p)
run_cmd
do x ← to_expr ``(7 + 3 : ℕ) >>= check_ac,
x ← pp x.2.2.1,
let y := "(some (is_left_id.left_id has_add.add, (is_right_id.right_id has_add.add, 0)))",
guard (x.to_string = y) <|> fail ("guard: " ++ x.to_string)
meta def test_pp {α} [has_to_tactic_format α] (tag : format) (expected : string) (prog : tactic α) : tactic unit :=
do r ← prog,
pp_r ← pp r,
guard (pp_r.to_string = expected) <|> fail format!"test_pp: {tag}"
run_cmd
do test_pp "test1"
"(3 + 6, (4 + 5, ([], has_add.add _ 2 + 1)))"
(parse_mono_function' ``(1 + 3 + 2 + 6) ``(4 + 2 + 1 + 5)),
test_pp "test2"
"([1] ++ [3] ++ [2] ++ [6], ([4] ++ [2] ++ [1] ++ [5], ([], append none _ none)))"
(parse_mono_function' ``([1] ++ [3] ++ [2] ++ [6]) ``([4] ++ [2] ++ ([1] ++ [5]))),
test_pp "test3"
"([3] ++ [2], ([5] ++ [4], ([], append (some [1]) _ (some [2]))))"
(parse_mono_function' ``([1] ++ [3] ++ [2] ++ [2]) ``([1] ++ [5] ++ ([4] ++ [2])))
|
d75c5ceb0c4822a5fd58681e7ebe88f4e763c719 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /tests/lean/run/tactic1.lean | 48bb5c99032556677ae8a7dc26db926132791bd7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,136 | lean | theorem ex1 (x : Nat) (y : { v // v > x }) (z : Nat) : Nat :=
by {
clear y x;
exact z
}
theorem ex2 (x : Nat) (y : { v // v > x }) (z : Nat) : Nat :=
by {
clear x y;
exact z
}
theorem ex3 (x y z : Nat) (h₁ : x = y) (h₂ : z = y) : x = z :=
by {
have : y = z := h₂.symm;
apply Eq.trans;
exact h₁;
assumption
}
theorem ex4 (x y z : Nat) (h₁ : x = y) (h₂ : z = y) : x = z :=
by {
let h₃ : y = z := h₂.symm;
apply Eq.trans;
exact h₁;
exact h₃
}
theorem ex5 (x y z : Nat) (h₁ : x = y) (h₂ : z = y) : x = z :=
by {
have h₃ : y = z := h₂.symm;
apply Eq.trans;
exact h₁;
exact h₃
}
theorem ex6 (x y z : Nat) (h₁ : x = y) (h₂ : z = y) : id (x + 0 = z) :=
by {
show x = z;
have h₃ : y = z := h₂.symm;
apply Eq.trans;
exact h₁;
exact h₃
}
theorem ex7 (x y z : Nat) (h₁ : x = y) (h₂ : z = y) : x = z := by
have : y = z := by apply Eq.symm; assumption
apply Eq.trans
exact h₁
assumption
theorem ex8 (x y z : Nat) (h₁ : x = y) (h₂ : z = y) : x = z :=
by apply Eq.trans h₁;
have : y = z := by
apply Eq.symm;
assumption;
exact this
|
2e742acbc5808051c29e09606a6622fd0f25ef75 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/measure_theory/constructions/borel_space/continuous_linear_map.lean | ee21c514a2f3b555a48eb4771eebcba66b48455d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,527 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import analysis.normed_space.finite_dimension
import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space.basic
/-!
# Measurable functions in normed spaces
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
-/
open measure_theory
variables {α : Type*} [measurable_space α]
namespace continuous_linear_map
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [measurable_space E]
[opens_measurable_space E] {F : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
[measurable_space F] [borel_space F]
@[measurability]
protected lemma measurable (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : measurable L :=
L.continuous.measurable
lemma measurable_comp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) {φ : α → E} (φ_meas : measurable φ) :
measurable (λ (a : α), L (φ a)) :=
L.measurable.comp φ_meas
end continuous_linear_map
namespace continuous_linear_map
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
instance : measurable_space (E →L[𝕜] F) := borel _
instance : borel_space (E →L[𝕜] F) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_apply [measurable_space F] [borel_space F] (x : E) :
measurable (λ f : E →L[𝕜] F, f x) :=
(apply 𝕜 F x).continuous.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_apply' [measurable_space E] [opens_measurable_space E]
[measurable_space F] [borel_space F] :
measurable (λ (x : E) (f : E →L[𝕜] F), f x) :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ $ λ f, f.measurable
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_coe [measurable_space F] [borel_space F] :
measurable (λ (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E), f x) :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ measurable_apply
end continuous_linear_map
section continuous_linear_map_nontrivially_normed_field
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [measurable_space E]
[borel_space E] {F : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.apply_continuous_linear_map {φ : α → F →L[𝕜] E} (hφ : measurable φ) (v : F) :
measurable (λ a, φ a v) :=
(continuous_linear_map.apply 𝕜 E v).measurable.comp hφ
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.apply_continuous_linear_map {φ : α → F →L[𝕜] E} {μ : measure α}
(hφ : ae_measurable φ μ) (v : F) : ae_measurable (λ a, φ a v) μ :=
(continuous_linear_map.apply 𝕜 E v).measurable.comp_ae_measurable hφ
end continuous_linear_map_nontrivially_normed_field
section normed_space
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜] [complete_space 𝕜] [measurable_space 𝕜]
variables [borel_space 𝕜] {E : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
[measurable_space E] [borel_space E]
lemma measurable_smul_const {f : α → 𝕜} {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
measurable (λ x, f x • c) ↔ measurable f :=
(closed_embedding_smul_left hc).measurable_embedding.measurable_comp_iff
lemma ae_measurable_smul_const {f : α → 𝕜} {μ : measure α} {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
ae_measurable (λ x, f x • c) μ ↔ ae_measurable f μ :=
(closed_embedding_smul_left hc).measurable_embedding.ae_measurable_comp_iff
end normed_space
|
760dc198e797e222626730b9d88545c5a62e2d01 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /stage0/src/Lean/Compiler/IR/Basic.lean | 446790079c75189a4912a61bcfb726474edbe491 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,186 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.KVMap
import Lean.Data.Name
import Lean.Data.Format
import Lean.Compiler.ExternAttr
/-
Implements (extended) λPure and λRc proposed in the article
"Counting Immutable Beans", Sebastian Ullrich and Leonardo de Moura.
The Lean to IR transformation produces λPure code, and
this part is implemented in C++. The procedures described in the paper
above are implemented in Lean.
-/
namespace Lean.IR
/- Function identifier -/
abbrev FunId := Name
abbrev Index := Nat
/- Variable identifier -/
structure VarId where
idx : Index
deriving Inhabited
/- Join point identifier -/
structure JoinPointId where
idx : Index
deriving Inhabited
abbrev Index.lt (a b : Index) : Bool := a < b
instance : BEq VarId := ⟨fun a b => a.idx == b.idx⟩
instance : ToString VarId := ⟨fun a => "x_" ++ toString a.idx⟩
instance : ToFormat VarId := ⟨fun a => toString a⟩
instance : Hashable VarId := ⟨fun a => hash a.idx⟩
instance : BEq JoinPointId := ⟨fun a b => a.idx == b.idx⟩
instance : ToString JoinPointId := ⟨fun a => "block_" ++ toString a.idx⟩
instance : ToFormat JoinPointId := ⟨fun a => toString a⟩
instance : Hashable JoinPointId := ⟨fun a => hash a.idx⟩
abbrev MData := KVMap
abbrev MData.empty : MData := {}
/- Low Level IR types. Most are self explanatory.
- `usize` represents the C++ `size_t` Type. We have it here
because it is 32-bit in 32-bit machines, and 64-bit in 64-bit machines,
and we want the C++ backend for our Compiler to generate platform independent code.
- `irrelevant` for Lean types, propositions and proofs.
- `object` a pointer to a value in the heap.
- `tobject` a pointer to a value in the heap or tagged pointer
(i.e., the least significant bit is 1) storing a scalar value.
- `struct` and `union` are used to return small values (e.g., `Option`, `Prod`, `Except`)
on the stack.
Remark: the RC operations for `tobject` are slightly more expensive because we
first need to test whether the `tobject` is really a pointer or not.
Remark: the Lean runtime assumes that sizeof(void*) == sizeof(sizeT).
Lean cannot be compiled on old platforms where this is not True.
Since values of type `struct` and `union` are only used to return values,
We assume they must be used/consumed "linearly". We use the term "linear" here
to mean "exactly once" in each execution. That is, given `x : S`, where `S` is a struct,
then one of the following must hold in each (execution) branch.
1- `x` occurs only at a single `ret x` instruction. That is, it is being consumed by being returned.
2- `x` occurs only at a single `ctor`. That is, it is being "consumed" by being stored into another `struct/union`.
3- We extract (aka project) every single field of `x` exactly once. That is, we are consuming `x` by consuming each
of one of its components. Minor refinement: we don't need to consume scalar fields or struct/union
fields that do not contain object fields.
-/
inductive IRType where
| float | uint8 | uint16 | uint32 | uint64 | usize
| irrelevant | object | tobject
| struct (leanTypeName : Option Name) (types : Array IRType) : IRType
| union (leanTypeName : Name) (types : Array IRType) : IRType
deriving Inhabited
namespace IRType
partial def beq : IRType → IRType → Bool
| float, float => true
| uint8, uint8 => true
| uint16, uint16 => true
| uint32, uint32 => true
| uint64, uint64 => true
| usize, usize => true
| irrelevant, irrelevant => true
| object, object => true
| tobject, tobject => true
| struct n₁ tys₁, struct n₂ tys₂ => n₁ == n₂ && Array.isEqv tys₁ tys₂ beq
| union n₁ tys₁, union n₂ tys₂ => n₁ == n₂ && Array.isEqv tys₁ tys₂ beq
| _, _ => false
instance : BEq IRType := ⟨beq⟩
def isScalar : IRType → Bool
| float => true
| uint8 => true
| uint16 => true
| uint32 => true
| uint64 => true
| usize => true
| _ => false
def isObj : IRType → Bool
| object => true
| tobject => true
| _ => false
def isIrrelevant : IRType → Bool
| irrelevant => true
| _ => false
def isStruct : IRType → Bool
| struct _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isUnion : IRType → Bool
| union _ _ => true
| _ => false
end IRType
/- Arguments to applications, constructors, etc.
We use `irrelevant` for Lean types, propositions and proofs that have been erased.
Recall that for a Function `f`, we also generate `f._rarg` which does not take
`irrelevant` arguments. However, `f._rarg` is only safe to be used in full applications. -/
inductive Arg where
| var (id : VarId)
| irrelevant
deriving Inhabited
protected def Arg.beq : Arg → Arg → Bool
| var x, var y => x == y
| irrelevant, irrelevant => true
| _, _ => false
instance : BEq Arg := ⟨Arg.beq⟩
@[export lean_ir_mk_var_arg] def mkVarArg (id : VarId) : Arg := Arg.var id
inductive LitVal where
| num (v : Nat)
| str (v : String)
def LitVal.beq : LitVal → LitVal → Bool
| num v₁, num v₂ => v₁ == v₂
| str v₁, str v₂ => v₁ == v₂
| _, _ => false
instance : BEq LitVal := ⟨LitVal.beq⟩
/- Constructor information.
- `name` is the Name of the Constructor in Lean.
- `cidx` is the Constructor index (aka tag).
- `size` is the number of arguments of type `object/tobject`.
- `usize` is the number of arguments of type `usize`.
- `ssize` is the number of bytes used to store scalar values.
Recall that a Constructor object contains a header, then a sequence of
pointers to other Lean objects, a sequence of `USize` (i.e., `size_t`)
scalar values, and a sequence of other scalar values. -/
structure CtorInfo where
name : Name
cidx : Nat
size : Nat
usize : Nat
ssize : Nat
def CtorInfo.beq : CtorInfo → CtorInfo → Bool
| ⟨n₁, cidx₁, size₁, usize₁, ssize₁⟩, ⟨n₂, cidx₂, size₂, usize₂, ssize₂⟩ =>
n₁ == n₂ && cidx₁ == cidx₂ && size₁ == size₂ && usize₁ == usize₂ && ssize₁ == ssize₂
instance : BEq CtorInfo := ⟨CtorInfo.beq⟩
def CtorInfo.isRef (info : CtorInfo) : Bool :=
info.size > 0 || info.usize > 0 || info.ssize > 0
def CtorInfo.isScalar (info : CtorInfo) : Bool :=
!info.isRef
inductive Expr where
/- We use `ctor` mainly for constructing Lean object/tobject values `lean_ctor_object` in the runtime.
This instruction is also used to creat `struct` and `union` return values.
For `union`, only `i.cidx` is relevant. For `struct`, `i` is irrelevant. -/
| ctor (i : CtorInfo) (ys : Array Arg)
| reset (n : Nat) (x : VarId)
/- `reuse x in ctor_i ys` instruction in the paper. -/
| reuse (x : VarId) (i : CtorInfo) (updtHeader : Bool) (ys : Array Arg)
/- Extract the `tobject` value at Position `sizeof(void*)*i` from `x`.
We also use `proj` for extracting fields from `struct` return values, and casting `union` return values. -/
| proj (i : Nat) (x : VarId)
/- Extract the `Usize` value at Position `sizeof(void*)*i` from `x`. -/
| uproj (i : Nat) (x : VarId)
/- Extract the scalar value at Position `sizeof(void*)*n + offset` from `x`. -/
| sproj (n : Nat) (offset : Nat) (x : VarId)
/- Full application. -/
| fap (c : FunId) (ys : Array Arg)
/- Partial application that creates a `pap` value (aka closure in our nonstandard terminology). -/
| pap (c : FunId) (ys : Array Arg)
/- Application. `x` must be a `pap` value. -/
| ap (x : VarId) (ys : Array Arg)
/- Given `x : ty` where `ty` is a scalar type, this operation returns a value of Type `tobject`.
For small scalar values, the Result is a tagged pointer, and no memory allocation is performed. -/
| box (ty : IRType) (x : VarId)
/- Given `x : [t]object`, obtain the scalar value. -/
| unbox (x : VarId)
| lit (v : LitVal)
/- Return `1 : uint8` Iff `RC(x) > 1` -/
| isShared (x : VarId)
/- Return `1 : uint8` Iff `x : tobject` is a tagged pointer (storing a scalar value). -/
| isTaggedPtr (x : VarId)
@[export lean_ir_mk_ctor_expr] def mkCtorExpr (n : Name) (cidx : Nat) (size : Nat) (usize : Nat) (ssize : Nat) (ys : Array Arg) : Expr :=
Expr.ctor ⟨n, cidx, size, usize, ssize⟩ ys
@[export lean_ir_mk_proj_expr] def mkProjExpr (i : Nat) (x : VarId) : Expr := Expr.proj i x
@[export lean_ir_mk_uproj_expr] def mkUProjExpr (i : Nat) (x : VarId) : Expr := Expr.uproj i x
@[export lean_ir_mk_sproj_expr] def mkSProjExpr (n : Nat) (offset : Nat) (x : VarId) : Expr := Expr.sproj n offset x
@[export lean_ir_mk_fapp_expr] def mkFAppExpr (c : FunId) (ys : Array Arg) : Expr := Expr.fap c ys
@[export lean_ir_mk_papp_expr] def mkPAppExpr (c : FunId) (ys : Array Arg) : Expr := Expr.pap c ys
@[export lean_ir_mk_app_expr] def mkAppExpr (x : VarId) (ys : Array Arg) : Expr := Expr.ap x ys
@[export lean_ir_mk_num_expr] def mkNumExpr (v : Nat) : Expr := Expr.lit (LitVal.num v)
@[export lean_ir_mk_str_expr] def mkStrExpr (v : String) : Expr := Expr.lit (LitVal.str v)
structure Param where
x : VarId
borrow : Bool
ty : IRType
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_ir_mk_param]
def mkParam (x : VarId) (borrow : Bool) (ty : IRType) : Param := ⟨x, borrow, ty⟩
inductive AltCore (FnBody : Type) : Type where
| ctor (info : CtorInfo) (b : FnBody) : AltCore FnBody
| default (b : FnBody) : AltCore FnBody
inductive FnBody where
/- `let x : ty := e; b` -/
| vdecl (x : VarId) (ty : IRType) (e : Expr) (b : FnBody)
/- Join point Declaration `block_j (xs) := e; b` -/
| jdecl (j : JoinPointId) (xs : Array Param) (v : FnBody) (b : FnBody)
/- Store `y` at Position `sizeof(void*)*i` in `x`. `x` must be a Constructor object and `RC(x)` must be 1.
This operation is not part of λPure is only used during optimization. -/
| set (x : VarId) (i : Nat) (y : Arg) (b : FnBody)
| setTag (x : VarId) (cidx : Nat) (b : FnBody)
/- Store `y : Usize` at Position `sizeof(void*)*i` in `x`. `x` must be a Constructor object and `RC(x)` must be 1. -/
| uset (x : VarId) (i : Nat) (y : VarId) (b : FnBody)
/- Store `y : ty` at Position `sizeof(void*)*i + offset` in `x`. `x` must be a Constructor object and `RC(x)` must be 1.
`ty` must not be `object`, `tobject`, `irrelevant` nor `Usize`. -/
| sset (x : VarId) (i : Nat) (offset : Nat) (y : VarId) (ty : IRType) (b : FnBody)
/- RC increment for `object`. If c == `true`, then `inc` must check whether `x` is a tagged pointer or not.
If `persistent == true` then `x` is statically known to be a persistent object. -/
| inc (x : VarId) (n : Nat) (c : Bool) (persistent : Bool) (b : FnBody)
/- RC decrement for `object`. If c == `true`, then `inc` must check whether `x` is a tagged pointer or not.
If `persistent == true` then `x` is statically known to be a persistent object. -/
| dec (x : VarId) (n : Nat) (c : Bool) (persistent : Bool) (b : FnBody)
| del (x : VarId) (b : FnBody)
| mdata (d : MData) (b : FnBody)
| case (tid : Name) (x : VarId) (xType : IRType) (cs : Array (AltCore FnBody))
| ret (x : Arg)
/- Jump to join point `j` -/
| jmp (j : JoinPointId) (ys : Array Arg)
| unreachable
instance : Inhabited FnBody := ⟨FnBody.unreachable⟩
abbrev FnBody.nil := FnBody.unreachable
@[export lean_ir_mk_vdecl] def mkVDecl (x : VarId) (ty : IRType) (e : Expr) (b : FnBody) : FnBody := FnBody.vdecl x ty e b
@[export lean_ir_mk_jdecl] def mkJDecl (j : JoinPointId) (xs : Array Param) (v : FnBody) (b : FnBody) : FnBody := FnBody.jdecl j xs v b
@[export lean_ir_mk_uset] def mkUSet (x : VarId) (i : Nat) (y : VarId) (b : FnBody) : FnBody := FnBody.uset x i y b
@[export lean_ir_mk_sset] def mkSSet (x : VarId) (i : Nat) (offset : Nat) (y : VarId) (ty : IRType) (b : FnBody) : FnBody := FnBody.sset x i offset y ty b
@[export lean_ir_mk_case] def mkCase (tid : Name) (x : VarId) (cs : Array (AltCore FnBody)) : FnBody :=
-- Type field `xType` is set by `explicitBoxing` compiler pass.
FnBody.case tid x IRType.object cs
@[export lean_ir_mk_ret] def mkRet (x : Arg) : FnBody := FnBody.ret x
@[export lean_ir_mk_jmp] def mkJmp (j : JoinPointId) (ys : Array Arg) : FnBody := FnBody.jmp j ys
@[export lean_ir_mk_unreachable] def mkUnreachable : Unit → FnBody := fun _ => FnBody.unreachable
abbrev Alt := AltCore FnBody
@[matchPattern] abbrev Alt.ctor := @AltCore.ctor FnBody
@[matchPattern] abbrev Alt.default := @AltCore.default FnBody
instance : Inhabited Alt := ⟨Alt.default arbitrary⟩
def FnBody.isTerminal : FnBody → Bool
| FnBody.case _ _ _ _ => true
| FnBody.ret _ => true
| FnBody.jmp _ _ => true
| FnBody.unreachable => true
| _ => false
def FnBody.body : FnBody → FnBody
| FnBody.vdecl _ _ _ b => b
| FnBody.jdecl _ _ _ b => b
| FnBody.set _ _ _ b => b
| FnBody.uset _ _ _ b => b
| FnBody.sset _ _ _ _ _ b => b
| FnBody.setTag _ _ b => b
| FnBody.inc _ _ _ _ b => b
| FnBody.dec _ _ _ _ b => b
| FnBody.del _ b => b
| FnBody.mdata _ b => b
| other => other
def FnBody.setBody : FnBody → FnBody → FnBody
| FnBody.vdecl x t v _, b => FnBody.vdecl x t v b
| FnBody.jdecl j xs v _, b => FnBody.jdecl j xs v b
| FnBody.set x i y _, b => FnBody.set x i y b
| FnBody.uset x i y _, b => FnBody.uset x i y b
| FnBody.sset x i o y t _, b => FnBody.sset x i o y t b
| FnBody.setTag x i _, b => FnBody.setTag x i b
| FnBody.inc x n c p _, b => FnBody.inc x n c p b
| FnBody.dec x n c p _, b => FnBody.dec x n c p b
| FnBody.del x _, b => FnBody.del x b
| FnBody.mdata d _, b => FnBody.mdata d b
| other, b => other
@[inline] def FnBody.resetBody (b : FnBody) : FnBody :=
b.setBody FnBody.nil
/- If b is a non terminal, then return a pair `(c, b')` s.t. `b == c <;> b'`,
and c.body == FnBody.nil -/
@[inline] def FnBody.split (b : FnBody) : FnBody × FnBody :=
let b' := b.body
let c := b.resetBody
(c, b')
def AltCore.body : Alt → FnBody
| Alt.ctor _ b => b
| Alt.default b => b
def AltCore.setBody : Alt → FnBody → Alt
| Alt.ctor c _, b => Alt.ctor c b
| Alt.default _, b => Alt.default b
@[inline] def AltCore.modifyBody (f : FnBody → FnBody) : AltCore FnBody → Alt
| Alt.ctor c b => Alt.ctor c (f b)
| Alt.default b => Alt.default (f b)
@[inline] def AltCore.mmodifyBody {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (f : FnBody → m FnBody) : AltCore FnBody → m Alt
| Alt.ctor c b => Alt.ctor c <$> f b
| Alt.default b => Alt.default <$> f b
def Alt.isDefault : Alt → Bool
| Alt.ctor _ _ => false
| Alt.default _ => true
def push (bs : Array FnBody) (b : FnBody) : Array FnBody :=
let b := b.resetBody
bs.push b
partial def flattenAux (b : FnBody) (r : Array FnBody) : (Array FnBody) × FnBody :=
if b.isTerminal then (r, b)
else flattenAux b.body (push r b)
def FnBody.flatten (b : FnBody) : (Array FnBody) × FnBody :=
flattenAux b #[]
partial def reshapeAux (a : Array FnBody) (i : Nat) (b : FnBody) : FnBody :=
if i == 0 then b
else
let i := i - 1
let (curr, a) := a.swapAt! i arbitrary
let b := curr.setBody b
reshapeAux a i b
def reshape (bs : Array FnBody) (term : FnBody) : FnBody :=
reshapeAux bs bs.size term
@[inline] def modifyJPs (bs : Array FnBody) (f : FnBody → FnBody) : Array FnBody :=
bs.map fun b => match b with
| FnBody.jdecl j xs v k => FnBody.jdecl j xs (f v) k
| other => other
@[inline] def mmodifyJPs {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (bs : Array FnBody) (f : FnBody → m FnBody) : m (Array FnBody) :=
bs.mapM fun b => match b with
| FnBody.jdecl j xs v k => do let v ← f v; pure $ FnBody.jdecl j xs v k
| other => pure other
@[export lean_ir_mk_alt] def mkAlt (n : Name) (cidx : Nat) (size : Nat) (usize : Nat) (ssize : Nat) (b : FnBody) : Alt :=
Alt.ctor ⟨n, cidx, size, usize, ssize⟩ b
/-- Extra information associated with a declaration. -/
structure DeclInfo where
/-- If `some <blame>`, then declaration depends on `<blame>` which uses a `sorry` axiom. -/
sorryDep? : Option Name := none
inductive Decl where
| fdecl (f : FunId) (xs : Array Param) (type : IRType) (body : FnBody) (info : DeclInfo)
| extern (f : FunId) (xs : Array Param) (type : IRType) (ext : ExternAttrData)
deriving Inhabited
namespace Decl
def name : Decl → FunId
| Decl.fdecl f .. => f
| Decl.extern f .. => f
def params : Decl → Array Param
| Decl.fdecl (xs := xs) .. => xs
| Decl.extern (xs := xs) .. => xs
def resultType : Decl → IRType
| Decl.fdecl (type := t) .. => t
| Decl.extern (type := t) .. => t
def isExtern : Decl → Bool
| Decl.extern .. => true
| _ => false
def getInfo : Decl → DeclInfo
| Decl.fdecl (info := info) .. => info
| _ => {}
def updateBody! (d : Decl) (bNew : FnBody) : Decl :=
match d with
| Decl.fdecl f xs t b info => Decl.fdecl f xs t bNew info
| _ => panic! "expected definition"
end Decl
@[export lean_ir_mk_decl] def mkDecl (f : FunId) (xs : Array Param) (ty : IRType) (b : FnBody) : Decl :=
Decl.fdecl f xs ty b {}
@[export lean_ir_mk_extern_decl] def mkExternDecl (f : FunId) (xs : Array Param) (ty : IRType) (e : ExternAttrData) : Decl :=
Decl.extern f xs ty e
open Std (RBTree RBTree.empty RBMap)
/-- Set of variable and join point names -/
abbrev IndexSet := RBTree Index Index.lt
instance : Inhabited IndexSet := ⟨{}⟩
def mkIndexSet (idx : Index) : IndexSet :=
RBTree.empty.insert idx
inductive LocalContextEntry where
| param : IRType → LocalContextEntry
| localVar : IRType → Expr → LocalContextEntry
| joinPoint : Array Param → FnBody → LocalContextEntry
abbrev LocalContext := RBMap Index LocalContextEntry Index.lt
def LocalContext.addLocal (ctx : LocalContext) (x : VarId) (t : IRType) (v : Expr) : LocalContext :=
ctx.insert x.idx (LocalContextEntry.localVar t v)
def LocalContext.addJP (ctx : LocalContext) (j : JoinPointId) (xs : Array Param) (b : FnBody) : LocalContext :=
ctx.insert j.idx (LocalContextEntry.joinPoint xs b)
def LocalContext.addParam (ctx : LocalContext) (p : Param) : LocalContext :=
ctx.insert p.x.idx (LocalContextEntry.param p.ty)
def LocalContext.addParams (ctx : LocalContext) (ps : Array Param) : LocalContext :=
ps.foldl LocalContext.addParam ctx
def LocalContext.isJP (ctx : LocalContext) (idx : Index) : Bool :=
match ctx.find? idx with
| some (LocalContextEntry.joinPoint _ _) => true
| other => false
def LocalContext.getJPBody (ctx : LocalContext) (j : JoinPointId) : Option FnBody :=
match ctx.find? j.idx with
| some (LocalContextEntry.joinPoint _ b) => some b
| other => none
def LocalContext.getJPParams (ctx : LocalContext) (j : JoinPointId) : Option (Array Param) :=
match ctx.find? j.idx with
| some (LocalContextEntry.joinPoint ys _) => some ys
| other => none
def LocalContext.isParam (ctx : LocalContext) (idx : Index) : Bool :=
match ctx.find? idx with
| some (LocalContextEntry.param _) => true
| other => false
def LocalContext.isLocalVar (ctx : LocalContext) (idx : Index) : Bool :=
match ctx.find? idx with
| some (LocalContextEntry.localVar _ _) => true
| other => false
def LocalContext.contains (ctx : LocalContext) (idx : Index) : Bool :=
Std.RBMap.contains ctx idx
def LocalContext.eraseJoinPointDecl (ctx : LocalContext) (j : JoinPointId) : LocalContext :=
ctx.erase j.idx
def LocalContext.getType (ctx : LocalContext) (x : VarId) : Option IRType :=
match ctx.find? x.idx with
| some (LocalContextEntry.param t) => some t
| some (LocalContextEntry.localVar t _) => some t
| other => none
def LocalContext.getValue (ctx : LocalContext) (x : VarId) : Option Expr :=
match ctx.find? x.idx with
| some (LocalContextEntry.localVar _ v) => some v
| other => none
abbrev IndexRenaming := RBMap Index Index Index.lt
class AlphaEqv (α : Type) where
aeqv : IndexRenaming → α → α → Bool
export AlphaEqv (aeqv)
def VarId.alphaEqv (ρ : IndexRenaming) (v₁ v₂ : VarId) : Bool :=
match ρ.find? v₁.idx with
| some v => v == v₂.idx
| none => v₁ == v₂
instance : AlphaEqv VarId := ⟨VarId.alphaEqv⟩
def Arg.alphaEqv (ρ : IndexRenaming) : Arg → Arg → Bool
| Arg.var v₁, Arg.var v₂ => aeqv ρ v₁ v₂
| Arg.irrelevant, Arg.irrelevant => true
| _, _ => false
instance : AlphaEqv Arg := ⟨Arg.alphaEqv⟩
def args.alphaEqv (ρ : IndexRenaming) (args₁ args₂ : Array Arg) : Bool :=
Array.isEqv args₁ args₂ (fun a b => aeqv ρ a b)
instance: AlphaEqv (Array Arg) := ⟨args.alphaEqv⟩
def Expr.alphaEqv (ρ : IndexRenaming) : Expr → Expr → Bool
| Expr.ctor i₁ ys₁, Expr.ctor i₂ ys₂ => i₁ == i₂ && aeqv ρ ys₁ ys₂
| Expr.reset n₁ x₁, Expr.reset n₂ x₂ => n₁ == n₂ && aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| Expr.reuse x₁ i₁ u₁ ys₁, Expr.reuse x₂ i₂ u₂ ys₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && i₁ == i₂ && u₁ == u₂ && aeqv ρ ys₁ ys₂
| Expr.proj i₁ x₁, Expr.proj i₂ x₂ => i₁ == i₂ && aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| Expr.uproj i₁ x₁, Expr.uproj i₂ x₂ => i₁ == i₂ && aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| Expr.sproj n₁ o₁ x₁, Expr.sproj n₂ o₂ x₂ => n₁ == n₂ && o₁ == o₂ && aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| Expr.fap c₁ ys₁, Expr.fap c₂ ys₂ => c₁ == c₂ && aeqv ρ ys₁ ys₂
| Expr.pap c₁ ys₁, Expr.pap c₂ ys₂ => c₁ == c₂ && aeqv ρ ys₁ ys₂
| Expr.ap x₁ ys₁, Expr.ap x₂ ys₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && aeqv ρ ys₁ ys₂
| Expr.box ty₁ x₁, Expr.box ty₂ x₂ => ty₁ == ty₂ && aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| Expr.unbox x₁, Expr.unbox x₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| Expr.lit v₁, Expr.lit v₂ => v₁ == v₂
| Expr.isShared x₁, Expr.isShared x₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| Expr.isTaggedPtr x₁, Expr.isTaggedPtr x₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| _, _ => false
instance : AlphaEqv Expr:= ⟨Expr.alphaEqv⟩
def addVarRename (ρ : IndexRenaming) (x₁ x₂ : Nat) :=
if x₁ == x₂ then ρ else ρ.insert x₁ x₂
def addParamRename (ρ : IndexRenaming) (p₁ p₂ : Param) : Option IndexRenaming :=
if p₁.ty == p₂.ty && p₁.borrow = p₂.borrow then some (addVarRename ρ p₁.x.idx p₂.x.idx)
else none
def addParamsRename (ρ : IndexRenaming) (ps₁ ps₂ : Array Param) : Option IndexRenaming := do
if ps₁.size != ps₂.size then
none
else
let mut ρ := ρ
for i in [:ps₁.size] do
ρ ← addParamRename ρ ps₁[i] ps₂[i]
pure ρ
partial def FnBody.alphaEqv : IndexRenaming → FnBody → FnBody → Bool
| ρ, FnBody.vdecl x₁ t₁ v₁ b₁, FnBody.vdecl x₂ t₂ v₂ b₂ => t₁ == t₂ && aeqv ρ v₁ v₂ && alphaEqv (addVarRename ρ x₁.idx x₂.idx) b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.jdecl j₁ ys₁ v₁ b₁, FnBody.jdecl j₂ ys₂ v₂ b₂ => match addParamsRename ρ ys₁ ys₂ with
| some ρ' => alphaEqv ρ' v₁ v₂ && alphaEqv (addVarRename ρ j₁.idx j₂.idx) b₁ b₂
| none => false
| ρ, FnBody.set x₁ i₁ y₁ b₁, FnBody.set x₂ i₂ y₂ b₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && i₁ == i₂ && aeqv ρ y₁ y₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.uset x₁ i₁ y₁ b₁, FnBody.uset x₂ i₂ y₂ b₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && i₁ == i₂ && aeqv ρ y₁ y₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.sset x₁ i₁ o₁ y₁ t₁ b₁, FnBody.sset x₂ i₂ o₂ y₂ t₂ b₂ =>
aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && i₁ = i₂ && o₁ = o₂ && aeqv ρ y₁ y₂ && t₁ == t₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.setTag x₁ i₁ b₁, FnBody.setTag x₂ i₂ b₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && i₁ == i₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.inc x₁ n₁ c₁ p₁ b₁, FnBody.inc x₂ n₂ c₂ p₂ b₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && n₁ == n₂ && c₁ == c₂ && p₁ == p₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.dec x₁ n₁ c₁ p₁ b₁, FnBody.dec x₂ n₂ c₂ p₂ b₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && n₁ == n₂ && c₁ == c₂ && p₁ == p₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.del x₁ b₁, FnBody.del x₂ b₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.mdata m₁ b₁, FnBody.mdata m₂ b₂ => m₁ == m₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| ρ, FnBody.case n₁ x₁ _ alts₁, FnBody.case n₂ x₂ _ alts₂ => n₁ == n₂ && aeqv ρ x₁ x₂ && Array.isEqv alts₁ alts₂ (fun alt₁ alt₂ =>
match alt₁, alt₂ with
| Alt.ctor i₁ b₁, Alt.ctor i₂ b₂ => i₁ == i₂ && alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| Alt.default b₁, Alt.default b₂ => alphaEqv ρ b₁ b₂
| _, _ => false)
| ρ, FnBody.jmp j₁ ys₁, FnBody.jmp j₂ ys₂ => j₁ == j₂ && aeqv ρ ys₁ ys₂
| ρ, FnBody.ret x₁, FnBody.ret x₂ => aeqv ρ x₁ x₂
| _, FnBody.unreachable, FnBody.unreachable => true
| _, _, _ => false
def FnBody.beq (b₁ b₂ : FnBody) : Bool :=
FnBody.alphaEqv ∅ b₁ b₂
instance : BEq FnBody := ⟨FnBody.beq⟩
abbrev VarIdSet := RBTree VarId (fun x y => x.idx < y.idx)
instance : Inhabited VarIdSet := ⟨{}⟩
def mkIf (x : VarId) (t e : FnBody) : FnBody :=
FnBody.case `Bool x IRType.uint8 #[
Alt.ctor {name := `Bool.false, cidx := 0, size := 0, usize := 0, ssize := 0} e,
Alt.ctor {name := `Bool.true, cidx := 1, size := 0, usize := 0, ssize := 0} t
]
end Lean.IR
|
aae6c09b9499b307ffffeeda28a74cbc52f43509 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/data/ordmap/ordset.lean | 6db3856a10650f29852e35af9b19651fd6dd9768 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 69,867 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.ordmap.ordnode
import algebra.order.ring
import data.nat.dist
import tactic.linarith
/-!
# Verification of the `ordnode α` datatype
This file proves the correctness of the operations in `data.ordmap.ordnode`.
The public facing version is the type `ordset α`, which is a wrapper around
`ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type, and it exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `ordset` that do the same
thing but bundle the correctness proofs. The advantage is that it is possible
to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert` will actually find
the element, while `ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`
## Implementation notes
The majority of this file is actually in the `ordnode` namespace, because we first
have to prove the correctness of all the operations (and defining what correctness
means here is actually somewhat subtle). So all the actual `ordset` operations are
at the very end, once we have all the theorems.
An `ordnode α` is an inductive type which describes a tree which stores the `size` at
internal nodes. The correctness invariant of an `ordnode α` is:
* `ordnode.sized t`: All internal `size` fields must match the actual measured
size of the tree. (This is not hard to satisfy.)
* `ordnode.balanced t`: Unless the tree has the form `()` or `((a) b)` or `(a (b))`
(that is, nil or a single singleton subtree), the two subtrees must satisfy
`size l ≤ δ * size r` and `size r ≤ δ * size l`, where `δ := 3` is a global
parameter of the data structure (and this property must hold recursively at subtrees).
This is why we say this is a "size balanced tree" data structure.
* `ordnode.bounded lo hi t`: The members of the tree must be in strictly increasing order,
meaning that if `a` is in the left subtree and `b` is the root, then `a ≤ b` and
`¬ (b ≤ a)`. We enforce this using `ordnode.bounded` which includes also a global
upper and lower bound.
Because the `ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`ordnode.valid'.balance_l_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
**Note:** This file is incomplete, in the sense that the intent is to have verified
versions and lemmas about all the definitions in `ordnode.lean`, but at the moment only
a few operations are verified (the hard part should be out of the way, but still).
Contributors are encouraged to pick this up and finish the job, if it appeals to you.
## Tags
ordered map, ordered set, data structure, verified programming
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace ordnode
/-! ### delta and ratio -/
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬ s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ}
(h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : false :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left dec_trivial).2 h₁) h₂) $
by simpa [mul_assoc] using nat.mul_le_mul_right a (dec_trivial : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
/-! ### `singleton` -/
/-! ### `size` and `empty` -/
/-- O(n). Computes the actual number of elements in the set, ignoring the cached `size` field. -/
def real_size : ordnode α → ℕ
| nil := 0
| (node _ l _ r) := real_size l + real_size r + 1
/-! ### `sized` -/
/-- The `sized` property asserts that all the `size` fields in nodes match the actual size of the
respective subtrees. -/
def sized : ordnode α → Prop
| nil := true
| (node s l _ r) := s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ sized l ∧ sized r
theorem sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @sized α l) (hr : sized r) : sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
theorem sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = node' l x r :=
by rw h.1; refl
theorem sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := H.1
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem sized.induction {t} (hl : @sized α t)
{C : ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (node' l x r)) : C t :=
begin
induction t, {exact H0},
rw hl.eq_node',
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
end
theorem size_eq_real_size : ∀ {t : ordnode α}, sized t → size t = real_size t
| nil _ := rfl
| (node s l x r) ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ :=
by rw [size, h₁, size_eq_real_size h₂, size_eq_real_size h₃]; refl
@[simp] theorem sized.size_eq_zero {t : ordnode α} (ht : sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil :=
by cases t; [simp, simp [ht.1]]
theorem sized.pos {s l x r} (h : sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s :=
by rw h.1; apply nat.le_add_left
/-! `dual` -/
theorem dual_dual : ∀ (t : ordnode α), dual (dual t) = t
| nil := rfl
| (node s l x r) := by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual, dual_dual]
@[simp] theorem size_dual (t : ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t :=
by cases t; refl
/-! `balanced` -/
/-- The `balanced_sz l r` asserts that a hypothetical tree with children of sizes `l` and `r` is
balanced: either `l ≤ δ * r` and `r ≤ δ * r`, or the tree is trivial with a singleton on one side
and nothing on the other. -/
def balanced_sz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ (l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l)
instance balanced_sz.dec : decidable_rel balanced_sz := λ l r, or.decidable
/-- The `balanced t` asserts that the tree `t` satisfies the balance invariants
(at every level). -/
def balanced : ordnode α → Prop
| nil := true
| (node _ l _ r) := balanced_sz (size l) (size r) ∧ balanced l ∧ balanced r
instance balanced.dec : decidable_pred (@balanced α) | t :=
by induction t; unfold balanced; resetI; apply_instance
theorem balanced_sz.symm {l r : ℕ} : balanced_sz l r → balanced_sz r l :=
or.imp (by rw add_comm; exact id) and.symm
theorem balanced_sz_zero {l : ℕ} : balanced_sz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 :=
by simp [balanced_sz] { contextual := tt }
theorem balanced_sz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂)
(h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : balanced_sz l r₁) : balanced_sz l r₂ :=
begin
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (λ h, _),
refine ⟨_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩,
cases H,
{ cases r₂,
{ cases h (le_trans (nat.add_le_add_left (nat.zero_le _) _) H) },
{ exact le_trans (le_trans (nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (nat.le_add_left 1 _) } },
{ exact le_trans H.1 (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁) }
end
theorem balanced_sz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂)
(h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : balanced_sz l r₂) : balanced_sz l r₁ :=
have l + r₂ ≤ 1 → balanced_sz l r₁, from
λ H, or.inl (le_trans (nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H),
or.cases_on H this (λ H, or.cases_on h₂ this (λ h₂,
or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩))
theorem balanced.dual : ∀ {t : ordnode α}, balanced t → balanced (dual t)
| nil h := ⟨⟩
| (node s l x r) ⟨b, bl, br⟩ :=
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
/-! ### `rotate` and `balance` -/
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, left associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3_l (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (m : ordnode α) (y : α) (r : ordnode α) : ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, right associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3_r (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (m : ordnode α) (y : α) (r : ordnode α) : ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> (a ()) b` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4_l : ordnode α → α → ordnode α → α → ordnode α → ordnode α
| l x (node _ ml y mr) z r := node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l x nil z r := node3_l l x nil z r -- should not happen
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> a (() b)` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4_r : ordnode α → α → ordnode α → α → ordnode α → ordnode α
| l x (node _ ml y mr) z r := node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l x nil z r := node3_r l x nil z r -- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a left rotation `x (y z) -> ((x y) z)`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotate_l : ordnode α → α → ordnode α → ordnode α
| l x (node _ m y r) :=
if size m < ratio * size r then node3_l l x m y r else node4_l l x m y r
| l x nil := node' l x nil -- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a right rotation `(x y) z -> (x (y z))`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotate_r : ordnode α → α → ordnode α → ordnode α
| (node _ l x m) y r :=
if size m < ratio * size l then node3_r l x m y r else node4_r l x m y r
| nil y r := node' nil y r -- should not happen
/-- A left balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balance_l' (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) : ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r else
if size l > delta * size r then rotate_r l x r else
node' l x r
/-- A right balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balance_r' (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) : ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r else
if size r > delta * size l then rotate_l l x r else
node' l x r
/-- The full balance operation. This is the same as `balance`, but with less manual inlining.
It is somewhat easier to work with this version in proofs. -/
def balance' (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) : ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r else
if size r > delta * size l then rotate_l l x r else
if size l > delta * size r then rotate_r l x r else
node' l x r
theorem dual_node' (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
theorem dual_node3_l (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (m : ordnode α) (y : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (node3_l l x m y r) = node3_r (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) :=
by simp [node3_l, node3_r, dual_node']
theorem dual_node3_r (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (m : ordnode α) (y : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (node3_r l x m y r) = node3_l (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) :=
by simp [node3_l, node3_r, dual_node']
theorem dual_node4_l (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (m : ordnode α) (y : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (node4_l l x m y r) = node4_r (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) :=
by cases m; simp [node4_l, node4_r, dual_node3_l, dual_node']
theorem dual_node4_r (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (m : ordnode α) (y : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (node4_r l x m y r) = node4_l (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) :=
by cases m; simp [node4_l, node4_r, dual_node3_r, dual_node']
theorem dual_rotate_l (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (rotate_l l x r) = rotate_r (dual r) x (dual l) :=
by cases r; simp [rotate_l, rotate_r, dual_node'];
split_ifs; simp [dual_node3_l, dual_node4_l]
theorem dual_rotate_r (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (rotate_r l x r) = rotate_l (dual r) x (dual l) :=
by rw [← dual_dual (rotate_l _ _ _), dual_rotate_l, dual_dual, dual_dual]
theorem dual_balance' (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) :=
begin
simp [balance', add_comm], split_ifs; simp [dual_node', dual_rotate_l, dual_rotate_r],
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
end
theorem dual_balance_l (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (balance_l l x r) = balance_r (dual r) x (dual l) :=
begin
unfold balance_l balance_r,
cases r with rs rl rx rr,
{ cases l with ls ll lx lr, {refl},
cases ll with lls lll llx llr; cases lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr;
dsimp only [dual]; try {refl},
split_ifs; repeat {simp [h, add_comm]} },
{ cases l with ls ll lx lr, {refl},
dsimp only [dual],
split_ifs, swap, {simp [add_comm]},
cases ll with lls lll llx llr; cases lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr; try {refl},
dsimp only [dual],
split_ifs; simp [h, add_comm] },
end
theorem dual_balance_r (l : ordnode α) (x : α) (r : ordnode α) :
dual (balance_r l x r) = balance_l (dual r) x (dual l) :=
by rw [← dual_dual (balance_l _ _ _), dual_balance_l, dual_dual, dual_dual]
theorem sized.node3_l {l x m y r}
(hl : @sized α l) (hm : sized m) (hr : sized r) : sized (node3_l l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
theorem sized.node3_r {l x m y r}
(hl : @sized α l) (hm : sized m) (hr : sized r) : sized (node3_r l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
theorem sized.node4_l {l x m y r}
(hl : @sized α l) (hm : sized m) (hr : sized r) : sized (node4_l l x m y r) :=
by cases m; [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr,
exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
theorem node3_l_size {l x m y r} :
size (@node3_l α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 :=
by dsimp [node3_l, node', size]; rw add_right_comm _ 1
theorem node3_r_size {l x m y r} :
size (@node3_r α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 :=
by dsimp [node3_r, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
theorem node4_l_size {l x m y r} (hm : sized m) :
size (@node4_l α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 :=
by cases m; simp [node4_l, node3_l, node', add_comm, add_left_comm]; [skip, simp [size, hm.1]];
rw [← add_assoc, ← bit0]; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
theorem sized.dual : ∀ {t : ordnode α} (h : sized t), sized (dual t)
| nil h := ⟨⟩
| (node s l x r) ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ := ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sized.dual sr, sized.dual sl⟩
theorem sized.dual_iff {t : ordnode α} : sized (dual t) ↔ sized t :=
⟨λ h, by rw ← dual_dual t; exact h.dual, sized.dual⟩
theorem sized.rotate_l {l x r} (hl : @sized α l) (hr : sized r) : sized (rotate_l l x r) :=
begin
cases r, {exact hl.node' hr},
rw rotate_l, split_ifs,
{ exact hl.node3_l hr.2.1 hr.2.2 },
{ exact hl.node4_l hr.2.1 hr.2.2 }
end
theorem sized.rotate_r {l x r} (hl : @sized α l) (hr : sized r) : sized (rotate_r l x r) :=
sized.dual_iff.1 $ by rw dual_rotate_r; exact hr.dual.rotate_l hl.dual
theorem sized.rotate_l_size {l x r} (hm : sized r) :
size (@rotate_l α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
begin
cases r; simp [rotate_l],
simp [size, hm.1, add_comm, add_left_comm], rw [← add_assoc, ← bit0], simp,
split_ifs; simp [node3_l_size, node4_l_size hm.2.1, add_comm, add_left_comm]
end
theorem sized.rotate_r_size {l x r} (hl : sized l) :
size (@rotate_r α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
by rw [← size_dual, dual_rotate_r, hl.dual.rotate_l_size,
size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
theorem sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @sized α l) (hr : sized r) : sized (balance' l x r) :=
begin
unfold balance', split_ifs,
{ exact hl.node' hr },
{ exact hl.rotate_l hr },
{ exact hl.rotate_r hr },
{ exact hl.node' hr }
end
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @sized α l) (hr : sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
begin
unfold balance', split_ifs,
{ refl },
{ exact hr.rotate_l_size },
{ exact hl.rotate_r_size },
{ refl }
end
/-! ## `all`, `any`, `emem`, `amem` -/
theorem all.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, all P t → all Q t
| nil h := ⟨⟩
| (node _ l x r) ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ⟨h₁.imp, H _ h₂, h₃.imp⟩
theorem any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, any P t → any Q t
| nil := id
| (node _ l x r) := or.imp any.imp $ or.imp (H _) any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : all P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨λ h, h.2.1, λ h, ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, λ h, or.inr (or.inl h)⟩
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : ordnode α},
all P (dual t) ↔ all P t
| nil := iff.rfl
| (node s l x r) :=
⟨λ ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩, ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩,
λ ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩, ⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, all P t ↔ ∀ x, emem x t → P x
| nil := (iff_true_intro $ by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| (node _ l x r) :=
by simp [all, emem, all_iff_forall, any, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, any P t ↔ ∃ x, emem x t ∧ P x
| nil := ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| (node _ l x r) :=
by simp [any, emem, any_iff_exists, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib]
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : emem x t ↔ ∀ P, all P t → P x :=
⟨λ h P al, all_iff_forall.1 al _ h,
λ H, H _ $ all_iff_forall.2 $ λ _, id⟩
theorem all_node' {P l x r} :
@all α P (node' l x r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P r := iff.rfl
theorem all_node3_l {P l x m y r} :
@all α P (node3_l l x m y r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P m ∧ P y ∧ all P r :=
by simp [node3_l, all_node', and_assoc]
theorem all_node3_r {P l x m y r} :
@all α P (node3_r l x m y r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P m ∧ P y ∧ all P r := iff.rfl
theorem all_node4_l {P l x m y r} :
@all α P (node4_l l x m y r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P m ∧ P y ∧ all P r :=
by cases m; simp [node4_l, all_node', all, all_node3_l, and_assoc]
theorem all_node4_r {P l x m y r} :
@all α P (node4_r l x m y r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P m ∧ P y ∧ all P r :=
by cases m; simp [node4_r, all_node', all, all_node3_r, and_assoc]
theorem all_rotate_l {P l x r} :
@all α P (rotate_l l x r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P r :=
by cases r; simp [rotate_l, all_node'];
split_ifs; simp [all_node3_l, all_node4_l, all]
theorem all_rotate_r {P l x r} :
@all α P (rotate_r l x r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P r :=
by rw [← all_dual, dual_rotate_r, all_rotate_l];
simp [all_dual, and_comm, and.left_comm]
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} :
@all α P (balance' l x r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P r :=
by rw balance'; split_ifs; simp [all_node', all_rotate_l, all_rotate_r]
/-! ### `to_list` -/
theorem foldr_cons_eq_to_list : ∀ (t : ordnode α) (r : list α),
t.foldr list.cons r = to_list t ++ r
| nil r := rfl
| (node _ l x r) r' := by rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_to_list, foldr_cons_eq_to_list,
← list.cons_append, ← list.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_to_list]; refl
@[simp] theorem to_list_nil : to_list (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem to_list_node (s l x r) : to_list (@node α s l x r) = to_list l ++ x :: to_list r :=
by rw [to_list, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_to_list]; refl
theorem emem_iff_mem_to_list {x : α} {t} : emem x t ↔ x ∈ to_list t :=
by unfold emem; induction t; simp [any, *, or_assoc]
theorem length_to_list' : ∀ t : ordnode α, (to_list t).length = t.real_size
| nil := rfl
| (node _ l _ r) := by rw [to_list_node, list.length_append, list.length_cons,
length_to_list', length_to_list']; refl
theorem length_to_list {t : ordnode α} (h : sized t) : (to_list t).length = t.size :=
by rw [length_to_list', size_eq_real_size h]
theorem equiv_iff {t₁ t₂ : ordnode α} (h₁ : sized t₁) (h₂ : sized t₂) :
equiv t₁ t₂ ↔ to_list t₁ = to_list t₂ :=
and_iff_right_of_imp $ λ h, by rw [← length_to_list h₁, h, length_to_list h₂]
/-! ### `mem` -/
theorem pos_size_of_mem [has_le α] [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
{x : α} {t : ordnode α} (h : sized t) (h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t :=
by { cases t, { contradiction }, { simp [h.1] } }
/-! ### `(find/erase/split)_(min/max)` -/
theorem find_min'_dual : ∀ t (x : α), find_min' (dual t) x = find_max' x t
| nil x := rfl
| (node _ l x r) _ := find_min'_dual r x
theorem find_max'_dual (t) (x : α) : find_max' x (dual t) = find_min' t x :=
by rw [← find_min'_dual, dual_dual]
theorem find_min_dual : ∀ t : ordnode α, find_min (dual t) = find_max t
| nil := rfl
| (node _ l x r) := congr_arg some $ find_min'_dual _ _
theorem find_max_dual (t : ordnode α) : find_max (dual t) = find_min t :=
by rw [← find_min_dual, dual_dual]
theorem dual_erase_min : ∀ t : ordnode α, dual (erase_min t) = erase_max (dual t)
| nil := rfl
| (node _ nil x r) := rfl
| (node _ l@(node _ _ _ _) x r) :=
by rw [erase_min, dual_balance_r, dual_erase_min, dual, dual, dual, erase_max]
theorem dual_erase_max (t : ordnode α) : dual (erase_max t) = erase_min (dual t) :=
by rw [← dual_dual (erase_min _), dual_erase_min, dual_dual]
theorem split_min_eq : ∀ s l (x : α) r,
split_min' l x r = (find_min' l x, erase_min (node s l x r))
| _ nil x r := rfl
| _ (node ls ll lx lr) x r :=
by rw [split_min', split_min_eq, split_min', find_min', erase_min]
theorem split_max_eq : ∀ s l (x : α) r,
split_max' l x r = (erase_max (node s l x r), find_max' x r)
| _ l x nil := rfl
| _ l x (node ls ll lx lr) :=
by rw [split_max', split_max_eq, split_max', find_max', erase_max]
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem find_min'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ t (x : α), all P t → P x → P (find_min' t x)
| nil x h hx := hx
| (node _ ll lx lr) x ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ hx := find_min'_all _ _ h₁ h₂
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem find_max'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (x : α) t, P x → all P t → P (find_max' x t)
| x nil hx h := hx
| x (node _ ll lx lr) hx ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := find_max'_all _ _ h₂ h₃
/-! ### `glue` -/
/-! ### `merge` -/
@[simp] theorem merge_nil_left (t : ordnode α) : merge t nil = t := by cases t; refl
@[simp] theorem merge_nil_right (t : ordnode α) : merge nil t = t := rfl
@[simp] theorem merge_node {ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr} :
merge (@node α ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) =
if delta * ls < rs then
balance_l (merge (node ls ll lx lr) rl) rx rr
else if delta * rs < ls then
balance_r ll lx (merge lr (node rs rl rx rr))
else glue (node ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) := rfl
/-! ### `insert` -/
theorem dual_insert [preorder α] [is_total α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (≤)] (x : α) :
∀ t : ordnode α, dual (ordnode.insert x t) = @ordnode.insert (order_dual α) _ _ x (dual t)
| nil := rfl
| (node _ l y r) := begin
rw [ordnode.insert, dual, ordnode.insert, order_dual.cmp_le_flip, ← cmp_le_swap x y],
cases cmp_le x y;
simp [ordering.swap, ordnode.insert, dual_balance_l, dual_balance_r, dual_insert]
end
/-! ### `balance` properties -/
theorem balance_eq_balance' {l x r}
(hl : balanced l) (hr : balanced r)
(sl : sized l) (sr : sized r) :
@balance α l x r = balance' l x r :=
begin
cases l with ls ll lx lr,
{ cases r with rs rl rx rr,
{ refl },
{ rw sr.eq_node' at hr ⊢,
cases rl with rls rll rlx rlr; cases rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr;
dsimp [balance, balance'],
{ refl },
{ have : size rrl = 0 ∧ size rrr = 0,
{ have := balanced_sz_zero.1 hr.1.symm,
rwa [size, sr.2.2.1, nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
nat.le_zero_iff, add_eq_zero_iff] at this },
cases sr.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1,
cases sr.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2,
have : rrs = 1 := sr.2.2.1, subst rrs,
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotate_l, if_pos], {refl},
all_goals {exact dec_trivial} },
{ have : size rll = 0 ∧ size rlr = 0,
{ have := balanced_sz_zero.1 hr.1,
rwa [size, sr.2.1.1, nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
nat.le_zero_iff, add_eq_zero_iff] at this },
cases sr.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1,
cases sr.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2,
have : rls = 1 := sr.2.1.1, subst rls,
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotate_l, if_neg], {refl},
all_goals {exact dec_trivial} },
{ symmetry, rw [zero_add, if_neg, if_pos, rotate_l],
{ split_ifs,
{ simp [node3_l, node', add_comm, add_left_comm] },
{ simp [node4_l, node', sr.2.1.1, add_comm, add_left_comm] } },
{ exact dec_trivial },
{ exact not_le_of_gt (nat.succ_lt_succ
(add_pos sr.2.1.pos sr.2.2.pos)) } } } },
{ cases r with rs rl rx rr,
{ rw sl.eq_node' at hl ⊢,
cases ll with lls lll llx llr; cases lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr;
dsimp [balance, balance'],
{ refl },
{ have : size lrl = 0 ∧ size lrr = 0,
{ have := balanced_sz_zero.1 hl.1.symm,
rwa [size, sl.2.2.1, nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
nat.le_zero_iff, add_eq_zero_iff] at this },
cases sl.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1,
cases sl.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2,
have : lrs = 1 := sl.2.2.1, subst lrs,
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotate_r, if_neg], {refl},
all_goals {exact dec_trivial} },
{ have : size lll = 0 ∧ size llr = 0,
{ have := balanced_sz_zero.1 hl.1,
rwa [size, sl.2.1.1, nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
nat.le_zero_iff, add_eq_zero_iff] at this },
cases sl.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1,
cases sl.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2,
have : lls = 1 := sl.2.1.1, subst lls,
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotate_r, if_pos], {refl},
all_goals {exact dec_trivial} },
{ symmetry, rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotate_r],
{ split_ifs,
{ simp [node3_r, node', add_comm, add_left_comm] },
{ simp [node4_r, node', sl.2.2.1, add_comm, add_left_comm] } },
{ exact dec_trivial },
{ exact dec_trivial },
{ exact not_le_of_gt (nat.succ_lt_succ
(add_pos sl.2.1.pos sl.2.2.pos)) } } },
{ simp [balance, balance'],
symmetry, rw [if_neg],
{ split_ifs,
{ have rd : delta ≤ size rl + size rr,
{ have := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sl.pos) h,
rwa [sr.1, nat.lt_succ_iff] at this },
cases rl with rls rll rlx rlr,
{ rw [size, zero_add] at rd,
exact absurd (le_trans rd (balanced_sz_zero.1 hr.1.symm)) dec_trivial },
cases rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr,
{ exact absurd (le_trans rd (balanced_sz_zero.1 hr.1)) dec_trivial },
dsimp [rotate_l], split_ifs,
{ simp [node3_l, node', sr.1, add_comm, add_left_comm] },
{ simp [node4_l, node', sr.1, sr.2.1.1, add_comm, add_left_comm] } },
{ have ld : delta ≤ size ll + size lr,
{ have := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sr.pos) h_1,
rwa [sl.1, nat.lt_succ_iff] at this },
cases ll with lls lll llx llr,
{ rw [size, zero_add] at ld,
exact absurd (le_trans ld (balanced_sz_zero.1 hl.1.symm)) dec_trivial },
cases lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr,
{ exact absurd (le_trans ld (balanced_sz_zero.1 hl.1)) dec_trivial },
dsimp [rotate_r], split_ifs,
{ simp [node3_r, node', sl.1, add_comm, add_left_comm] },
{ simp [node4_r, node', sl.1, sl.2.2.1, add_comm, add_left_comm] } },
{ simp [node'] } },
{ exact not_le_of_gt (add_le_add sl.pos sr.pos : 2 ≤ ls + rs) } } }
end
theorem balance_l_eq_balance {l x r}
(sl : sized l) (sr : sized r)
(H1 : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l) :
@balance_l α l x r = balance l x r :=
begin
cases r with rs rl rx rr,
{ refl },
{ cases l with ls ll lx lr,
{ have : size rl = 0 ∧ size rr = 0,
{ have := H1 rfl,
rwa [size, sr.1, nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
nat.le_zero_iff, add_eq_zero_iff] at this },
cases sr.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1,
cases sr.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2,
rw sr.eq_node', refl },
{ replace H2 : ¬ rs > delta * ls := not_lt_of_le (H2 sl.pos sr.pos),
simp [balance_l, balance, H2]; split_ifs; simp [add_comm] } }
end
/-- `raised n m` means `m` is either equal or one up from `n`. -/
def raised (n m : ℕ) : Prop := m = n ∨ m = n + 1
theorem raised_iff {n m} : raised n m ↔ n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n + 1 :=
begin
split, rintro (rfl | rfl),
{ exact ⟨le_refl _, nat.le_succ _⟩ },
{ exact ⟨nat.le_succ _, le_refl _⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with rfl | h₁,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ exact or.inr (le_antisymm h₂ h₁) } }
end
theorem raised.dist_le {n m} (H : raised n m) : nat.dist n m ≤ 1 :=
by cases raised_iff.1 H with H1 H2;
rwa [nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le H1, sub_le_iff_left]
theorem raised.dist_le' {n m} (H : raised n m) : nat.dist m n ≤ 1 :=
by rw nat.dist_comm; exact H.dist_le
theorem raised.add_left (k) {n m} (H : raised n m) : raised (k + n) (k + m) :=
begin
rcases H with rfl | rfl,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ exact or.inr rfl }
end
theorem raised.add_right (k) {n m} (H : raised n m) : raised (n + k) (m + k) :=
by rw [add_comm, add_comm m]; exact H.add_left _
theorem raised.right {l x₁ x₂ r₁ r₂} (H : raised (size r₁) (size r₂)) :
raised (size (@node' α l x₁ r₁)) (size (@node' α l x₂ r₂)) :=
begin
dsimp [node', size], generalize_hyp : size r₂ = m at H ⊢,
rcases H with rfl | rfl,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ exact or.inr rfl }
end
theorem balance_l_eq_balance' {l x r}
(hl : balanced l) (hr : balanced r)
(sl : sized l) (sr : sized r)
(H : (∃ l', raised l' (size l) ∧ balanced_sz l' (size r)) ∨
(∃ r', raised (size r) r' ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r')) :
@balance_l α l x r = balance' l x r :=
begin
rw [← balance_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr, balance_l_eq_balance sl sr],
{ intro l0, rw l0 at H,
rcases H with ⟨_, ⟨⟨⟩⟩|⟨⟨⟩⟩, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩,
{ exact balanced_sz_zero.1 H.symm },
exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 (balanced_sz_zero.1 H.symm) },
{ intros l1 r1,
rcases H with ⟨l', e, H | ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ | ⟨r', e, H | ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩,
{ exact le_trans (le_trans (nat.le_add_left _ _) H)
(mul_pos dec_trivial l1 : (0:ℕ)<_) },
{ exact le_trans H₂ (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (raised_iff.1 e).1) },
{ cases raised_iff.1 e, unfold delta, linarith },
{ exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 H₂ } }
end
theorem balance_sz_dual {l r}
(H : (∃ l', raised (@size α l) l' ∧ balanced_sz l' (@size α r)) ∨
∃ r', raised r' (size r) ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r') :
(∃ l', raised l' (size (dual r)) ∧ balanced_sz l' (size (dual l))) ∨
∃ r', raised (size (dual l)) r' ∧ balanced_sz (size (dual r)) r' :=
begin
rw [size_dual, size_dual],
exact H.symm.imp
(Exists.imp $ λ _, and.imp_right balanced_sz.symm)
(Exists.imp $ λ _, and.imp_right balanced_sz.symm)
end
theorem size_balance_l {l x r}
(hl : balanced l) (hr : balanced r)
(sl : sized l) (sr : sized r)
(H : (∃ l', raised l' (size l) ∧ balanced_sz l' (size r)) ∨
(∃ r', raised (size r) r' ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r')) :
size (@balance_l α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
by rw [balance_l_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
theorem all_balance_l {P l x r}
(hl : balanced l) (hr : balanced r)
(sl : sized l) (sr : sized r)
(H : (∃ l', raised l' (size l) ∧ balanced_sz l' (size r)) ∨
(∃ r', raised (size r) r' ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r')) :
all P (@balance_l α l x r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P r :=
by rw [balance_l_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
theorem balance_r_eq_balance' {l x r}
(hl : balanced l) (hr : balanced r)
(sl : sized l) (sr : sized r)
(H : (∃ l', raised (size l) l' ∧ balanced_sz l' (size r)) ∨
(∃ r', raised r' (size r) ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r')) :
@balance_r α l x r = balance' l x r :=
by rw [← dual_dual (balance_r l x r), dual_balance_r,
balance_l_eq_balance' hr.dual hl.dual sr.dual sl.dual (balance_sz_dual H),
← dual_balance', dual_dual]
theorem size_balance_r {l x r}
(hl : balanced l) (hr : balanced r)
(sl : sized l) (sr : sized r)
(H : (∃ l', raised (size l) l' ∧ balanced_sz l' (size r)) ∨
(∃ r', raised r' (size r) ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r')) :
size (@balance_r α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
by rw [balance_r_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
theorem all_balance_r {P l x r}
(hl : balanced l) (hr : balanced r)
(sl : sized l) (sr : sized r)
(H : (∃ l', raised (size l) l' ∧ balanced_sz l' (size r)) ∨
(∃ r', raised r' (size r) ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r')) :
all P (@balance_r α l x r) ↔ all P l ∧ P x ∧ all P r :=
by rw [balance_r_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
/-! ### `bounded` -/
section
variable [preorder α]
/-- `bounded t lo hi` says that every element `x ∈ t` is in the range `lo < x < hi`, and also this
property holds recursively in subtrees, making the full tree a BST. The bounds can be set to
`lo = ⊥` and `hi = ⊤` if we care only about the internal ordering constraints. -/
def bounded : ordnode α → with_bot α → with_top α → Prop
| nil (some a) (some b) := a < b
| nil _ _ := true
| (node _ l x r) o₁ o₂ := bounded l o₁ ↑x ∧ bounded r ↑x o₂
theorem bounded.dual : ∀ {t : ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} (h : bounded t o₁ o₂),
@bounded (order_dual α) _ (dual t) o₂ o₁
| nil o₁ o₂ h := by cases o₁; cases o₂; try {trivial}; exact h
| (node s l x r) _ _ ⟨ol, or⟩ := ⟨or.dual, ol.dual⟩
theorem bounded.dual_iff {t : ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : bounded t o₁ o₂ ↔
@bounded (order_dual α) _ (dual t) o₂ o₁ :=
⟨bounded.dual, λ h, by have := bounded.dual h;
rwa [dual_dual, order_dual.preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem bounded.weak_left : ∀ {t : ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, bounded t o₁ o₂ → bounded t ⊥ o₂
| nil o₁ o₂ h := by cases o₂; try {trivial}; exact h
| (node s l x r) _ _ ⟨ol, or⟩ := ⟨ol.weak_left, or⟩
theorem bounded.weak_right : ∀ {t : ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, bounded t o₁ o₂ → bounded t o₁ ⊤
| nil o₁ o₂ h := by cases o₁; try {trivial}; exact h
| (node s l x r) _ _ ⟨ol, or⟩ := ⟨ol, or.weak_right⟩
theorem bounded.weak {t : ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} (h : bounded t o₁ o₂) : bounded t ⊥ ⊤ :=
h.weak_left.weak_right
theorem bounded.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) :
∀ {t : ordnode α} {o}, bounded t ↑y o → bounded t ↑x o
| nil none h := ⟨⟩
| nil (some z) h := lt_of_le_of_lt xy h
| (node s l z r) o ⟨ol, or⟩ := ⟨ol.mono_left, or⟩
theorem bounded.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) :
∀ {t : ordnode α} {o}, bounded t o ↑x → bounded t o ↑y
| nil none h := ⟨⟩
| nil (some z) h := lt_of_lt_of_le h xy
| (node s l z r) o ⟨ol, or⟩ := ⟨ol, or.mono_right⟩
theorem bounded.to_lt : ∀ {t : ordnode α} {x y : α}, bounded t x y → x < y
| nil x y h := h
| (node _ l y r) x z ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := lt_trans h₁.to_lt h₂.to_lt
theorem bounded.to_nil {t : ordnode α} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, bounded t o₁ o₂ → bounded nil o₁ o₂
| none _ h := ⟨⟩
| (some _) none h := ⟨⟩
| (some x) (some y) h := h.to_lt
theorem bounded.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : ordnode α} {x : α} :
∀ {o₁ o₂}, bounded t₁ o₁ ↑x → bounded t₂ ↑x o₂ → bounded t₂ o₁ o₂
| none o₂ h₁ h₂ := h₂.weak_left
| (some y) o₂ h₁ h₂ := h₂.mono_left (le_of_lt h₁.to_lt)
theorem bounded.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : ordnode α} {x : α} :
∀ {o₁ o₂}, bounded t₁ o₁ ↑x → bounded t₂ ↑x o₂ → bounded t₁ o₁ o₂
| o₁ none h₁ h₂ := h₁.weak_right
| o₁ (some y) h₁ h₂ := h₁.mono_right (le_of_lt h₂.to_lt)
theorem bounded.mem_lt : ∀ {t o} {x : α}, bounded t o ↑x → all (< x) t
| nil o x _ := ⟨⟩
| (node _ l y r) o x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
⟨h₁.mem_lt.imp (λ z h, lt_trans h h₂.to_lt), h₂.to_lt, h₂.mem_lt⟩
theorem bounded.mem_gt : ∀ {t o} {x : α}, bounded t ↑x o → all (> x) t
| nil o x _ := ⟨⟩
| (node _ l y r) o x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ :=
⟨h₁.mem_gt, h₁.to_lt, h₂.mem_gt.imp (λ z, lt_trans h₁.to_lt)⟩
theorem bounded.of_lt : ∀ {t o₁ o₂} {x : α},
bounded t o₁ o₂ → bounded nil o₁ ↑x → all (< x) t → bounded t o₁ ↑x
| nil o₁ o₂ x _ hn _ := hn
| (node _ l y r) o₁ o₂ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hn ⟨al₁, al₂, al₃⟩ := ⟨h₁, h₂.of_lt al₂ al₃⟩
theorem bounded.of_gt : ∀ {t o₁ o₂} {x : α},
bounded t o₁ o₂ → bounded nil ↑x o₂ → all (> x) t → bounded t ↑x o₂
| nil o₁ o₂ x _ hn _ := hn
| (node _ l y r) o₁ o₂ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hn ⟨al₁, al₂, al₃⟩ := ⟨h₁.of_gt al₂ al₁, h₂⟩
theorem bounded.to_sep {t₁ t₂ o₁ o₂} {x : α}
(h₁ : bounded t₁ o₁ ↑x) (h₂ : bounded t₂ ↑x o₂) : t₁.all (λ y, t₂.all (λ z : α, y < z)) :=
h₁.mem_lt.imp $ λ y yx, h₂.mem_gt.imp $ λ z xz, lt_trans yx xz
end
/-! ### `valid` -/
section
variable [preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure valid' (lo : with_bot α) (t : ordnode α) (hi : with_top α) : Prop :=
(ord : t.bounded lo hi)
(sz : t.sized)
(bal : t.balanced)
/-- The validity predicate for an `ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def valid (t : ordnode α) : Prop := valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y)
{t : ordnode α} {o} (h : valid' ↑y t o) : valid' ↑x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y)
{t : ordnode α} {o} (h : valid' o t ↑x) : valid' o t ↑y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂}
(h : bounded t₁ o₁ ↑x) (H : valid' ↑x t₂ o₂) : valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂}
(H : valid' o₁ t₁ ↑x) (h : bounded t₂ ↑x o₂) : valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem valid'.of_lt {t : ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂}
(H : valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : bounded nil o₁ ↑x) (h₂ : all (< x) t) : valid' o₁ t ↑x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem valid'.of_gt {t : ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂}
(H : valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : bounded nil ↑x o₂) (h₂ : all (> x) t) : valid' ↑x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : valid t := ⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : bounded nil o₁ o₂) : valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ := ⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : valid (@nil α) := valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem valid'.node {s l x r o₁ o₂}
(hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H : balanced_sz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem valid'.dual : ∀ {t : ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} (h : valid' o₁ t o₂),
@valid' (order_dual α) _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| nil o₁ o₂ h := valid'_nil h.1.dual
| (node s l x r) o₁ o₂ ⟨⟨ol, or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ :=
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩,
⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := valid'.dual ⟨or, sr, br⟩ in
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩,
⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem valid'.dual_iff {t : ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔
@valid' (order_dual α) _ o₂ (dual t) o₁ :=
⟨valid'.dual, λ h, by have := valid'.dual h;
rwa [dual_dual, order_dual.preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem valid.dual {t : ordnode α} : valid t →
@valid (order_dual α) _ (dual t) := valid'.dual
theorem valid.dual_iff {t : ordnode α} : valid t ↔
@valid (order_dual α) _ (dual t) := valid'.dual_iff
theorem valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂) : valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂) : valid' ↑x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
theorem valid.left {s l x r} (H : valid (@node α s l x r)) : valid l := H.left.valid
theorem valid.right {s l x r} (H : valid (@node α s l x r)) : valid r := H.right.valid
theorem valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := H.2.1
theorem valid'.node' {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H : balanced_sz (size l) (size r)) : valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂}
(h₁ : bounded nil o₁ ↑x) (h₂ : bounded nil ↑x o₂) : valid' o₁ (singleton x : ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : valid (singleton x : ordnode α) := valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem valid'.node3_l {l x m y r o₁ o₂}
(hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hm : valid' ↑x m ↑y) (hr : valid' ↑y r o₂)
(H1 : balanced_sz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : balanced_sz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) :
valid' o₁ (@node3_l α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem valid'.node3_r {l x m y r o₁ o₂}
(hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hm : valid' ↑x m ↑y) (hr : valid' ↑y r o₂)
(H1 : balanced_sz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : balanced_sz (size m) (size r)) :
valid' o₁ (@node3_r α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem valid'.node4_l_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ}
(lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by linarith
theorem valid'.node4_l_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by linarith
theorem valid'.node4_l_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ}
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : d ≤ 3 * c := by linarith
theorem valid'.node4_l_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ}
(lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by linarith
theorem valid'.node4_l_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ}
(lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1)
(mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by linarith
theorem valid'.node4_l {l x m y r o₁ o₂}
(hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hm : valid' ↑x m ↑y) (hr : valid' ↑y r o₂)
(Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : (size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1) ∨
(0 < size l ∧ ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧
size m ≤ delta * size r)) :
valid' o₁ (@node4_l α l x m y r) o₂ :=
begin
cases m with s ml z mr, {cases Hm},
suffices : balanced_sz (size l) (size ml) ∧
balanced_sz (size mr) (size r) ∧
balanced_sz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1),
from (valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2),
rcases H with ⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩,
{ rw [hm.2.size_eq, nat.succ_inj', add_eq_zero_iff] at m1,
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2], rcases size r with _|_|_; exact dec_trivial },
{ cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 r0,
{ rw r0 at mr₂, cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂ },
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂,
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1,
{ have r1 := le_antisymm ((mul_le_mul_left dec_trivial).1
(le_trans mr₁ (nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0,
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁,
have l1 := le_antisymm ((mul_le_mul_left dec_trivial).1
(le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1)) l0,
rw [l1, r1],
cases size ml; cases size mr,
{ exact dec_trivial },
{ rw zero_add at mm, rcases mm with _|⟨_,⟨⟩⟩,
exact dec_trivial },
{ rcases mm with _|⟨_,⟨⟩⟩, exact dec_trivial },
{ rw nat.succ_add at mm, rcases mm with _|⟨_,⟨⟩⟩ } },
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩,
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 ml0,
{ rw [ml0, mul_zero, nat.le_zero_iff] at mm₂,
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm, cases mm dec_trivial },
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size mr) with mr0 mr0,
{ rw [mr0, mul_zero, nat.le_zero_iff] at mm₁,
rw [mr0, mm₁] at mm, cases mm dec_trivial },
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1,
{ have := nat.mul_le_mul_left _ lr₁,
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this,
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _),
rw [← nat.succ_mul] at this,
exact (mul_le_mul_left dec_trivial).1 this },
refine ⟨or.inr ⟨_, _⟩, or.inr ⟨_, _⟩, or.inr ⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ refine (mul_le_mul_left dec_trivial).1 (le_trans this _),
rw [two_mul, nat.succ_le_iff],
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le _ mm₂,
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (dec_trivial:1<3) },
{ exact nat.le_of_lt_succ (valid'.node4_l_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁) },
{ exact valid'.node4_l_lemma₂ mr₂ },
{ exact valid'.node4_l_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁ },
{ exact valid'.node4_l_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁ },
{ exact valid'.node4_l_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂ } }
end
theorem valid'.rotate_l_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ}
(H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by linarith
theorem valid'.rotate_l_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ}
(H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by linarith
theorem valid'.rotate_l_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ}
(H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by linarith
theorem valid'.rotate_l_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ}
(H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by linarith
theorem valid'.rotate_l {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬ size l + size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) :
valid' o₁ (@rotate_l α l x r) o₂ :=
begin
cases r with rs rl rx rr, {cases H2},
rw [hr.2.size_eq, nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2,
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3,
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@nat.le_of_add_le_add_right 2 _ _) nat.le_of_succ_le_succ,
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2,
{ intro l0, rw l0 at H3,
exact (or_iff_right_of_imp $ by exact λ h,
(mul_le_mul_left dec_trivial).1 (le_trans h dec_trivial)).1 H3 },
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 :=
λ l0 : 1 ≤ size l, (or_iff_left_of_imp $ by intro; linarith).1 H3,
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1, {intros, linarith},
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬ size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := λ l0 hb, absurd
(le_trans (le_trans (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) dec_trivial,
rw rotate_l, split_ifs,
{ have rr0 : size rr > 0 := (mul_lt_mul_left dec_trivial).1
(lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _),
suffices : balanced_sz (size l) (size rl) ∧ balanced_sz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr),
{ exact hl.node3_l hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2 },
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 l0,
{ rw l0, replace H3 := H3_0 l0,
have := hr.3.1,
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 rl0,
{ rw rl0 at this ⊢,
rw le_antisymm (balanced_sz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0,
exact dec_trivial },
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0,
rw add_comm at H3,
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1, from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0],
exact dec_trivial },
replace H3 := H3p l0,
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨hb₁, hb₂⟩,
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 rl0,
{ rw rl0 at hb₂, cases not_le_of_gt rr0 hb₂ },
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (show 1 ≤ size rr, from rr0) with rr1 rr1,
{ rw [← rr1] at h H2 ⊢,
have : size rl = 1 := le_antisymm (nat.lt_succ_iff.1 h) rl0,
rw this at H2,
exact absurd (le_trans (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) dec_trivial },
refine ⟨or.inr ⟨_, _⟩, or.inr ⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ exact valid'.rotate_l_lemma₁ H2 hb₂ },
{ exact nat.le_of_lt_succ (valid'.rotate_l_lemma₂ H3 h) },
{ exact valid'.rotate_l_lemma₃ H2 h },
{ exact le_trans hb₂ (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ $
le_trans (nat.le_add_left _ _) (nat.le_add_right _ _)) } },
{ cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 rl0,
{ rw [rl0, not_lt, nat.le_zero_iff, nat.mul_eq_zero] at h,
replace h := h.resolve_left dec_trivial,
rw [rl0, h, nat.le_zero_iff, nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2,
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left dec_trivial] at H1,
cases H1 dec_trivial },
refine hl.node4_l hr.left hr.right rl0 _,
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 l0,
{ replace H3 := H3_0 l0,
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 rr0,
{ have := hr.3.1,
rw rr0 at this,
exact or.inl ⟨l0,
le_antisymm (balanced_sz_zero.1 this) rl0,
rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩ },
exact or.inl ⟨l0,
le_antisymm (ablem rr0 $ by rwa add_comm) rl0,
ablem rl0 H3⟩ },
exact or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2,
valid'.rotate_l_lemma₄ (H3p l0),
(hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩ }
end
theorem valid'.rotate_r {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬ size l + size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) :
valid' o₁ (@rotate_r α l x r) o₂ :=
begin
refine valid'.dual_iff.2 _,
rw dual_rotate_r,
refine hr.dual.rotate_l hl.dual _ _ _,
{ rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm] },
{ rwa [size_dual, size_dual] },
{ rwa [size_dual, size_dual] }
end
theorem valid'.balance'_aux {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) :
valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
begin
rw balance', split_ifs,
{ exact hl.node' hr (or.inl h) },
{ exact hl.rotate_l hr h h_1 H₁ },
{ exact hl.rotate_r hr h h_2 H₂ },
{ exact hl.node' hr (or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩) }
end
theorem valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'}
(H1 : balanced_sz l' r')
(H2 : nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨
nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 :=
begin
suffices : @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1),
{ cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 l0,
{ apply or.inr, rwa l0 at this },
change 1 ≤ _ at l0, apply or.inl, linarith },
rcases H2 with ⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩;
rcases H1 with h | ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
{ exact le_trans (nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (nat.le_add_left _ _)) },
{ exact le_trans h₂ (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ $
le_trans (nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (nat.add_le_add_left hl _)) },
{ exact le_trans (nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) dec_trivial) },
{ rw nat.mul_succ,
exact le_trans (nat.dist_tri_right' _ _)
(add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr dec_trivial)) },
end
theorem valid'.balance' {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', balanced_sz l' r' ∧
(nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨
nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨l', r', H1, H2⟩ := H in
valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem valid'.balance {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', balanced_sz l' r' ∧
(nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨
nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ :=
by rw balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem valid'.balance_l_aux {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1)
(H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) :
valid' o₁ (@balance_l α l x r) o₂ :=
begin
rw [balance_l_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2],
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (or.inl _) H₃,
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 r0,
{ rw r0, exact nat.zero_le _ },
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 l0,
{ rw l0, exact le_trans (nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) dec_trivial },
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0, linarith
end
theorem valid'.balance_l {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', raised l' (size l) ∧ balanced_sz l' (size r)) ∨
(∃ r', raised (size r) r' ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r')) :
valid' o₁ (@balance_l α l x r) o₂ :=
begin
rw balance_l_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H,
refine hl.balance' hr _,
rcases H with ⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩,
{ exact ⟨_, _, H, or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩ },
{ exact ⟨_, _, H, or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩ },
end
theorem valid'.balance_r_aux {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1)
(H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) :
valid' o₁ (@balance_r α l x r) o₂ :=
begin
rw [valid'.dual_iff, dual_balance_r],
have := hr.dual.balance_l_aux hl.dual,
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this,
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
end
theorem valid'.balance_r {l x r o₁ o₂} (hl : valid' o₁ l ↑x) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', raised (size l) l' ∧ balanced_sz l' (size r)) ∨
(∃ r', raised r' (size r) ∧ balanced_sz (size l) r')) :
valid' o₁ (@balance_r α l x r) o₂ :=
by rw [valid'.dual_iff, dual_balance_r]; exact
hr.dual.balance_l hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem valid'.erase_max_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂}
(H : valid' o₁ (node s l x r) o₂) :
valid' o₁ (@erase_max α (node' l x r)) ↑(find_max' x r) ∧
size (node' l x r) = size (erase_max (node' l x r)) + 1 :=
begin
have := H.2.eq_node', rw this at H, clear this,
induction r with rs rl rx rr IHrl IHrr generalizing l x o₁,
{ exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩ },
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node', rw this at H ⊢,
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩,
refine ⟨valid'.balance_l H.left h (or.inr ⟨_, or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), _⟩,
rw [erase_max, size_balance_l H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (or.inr ⟨_, or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)],
rw [size, e], refl
end
theorem valid'.erase_min_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂}
(H : valid' o₁ (node s l x r) o₂) :
valid' ↑(find_min' l x) (@erase_min α (node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (node' l x r) = size (erase_min (node' l x r)) + 1 :=
by have := H.dual.erase_max_aux;
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_erase_min,
size_dual, ← valid'.dual_iff, find_max'_dual] at this
theorem erase_min.valid : ∀ {t} (h : @valid α _ t), valid (erase_min t)
| nil _ := valid_nil
| (node _ l x r) h := by rw h.2.eq_node'; exact h.erase_min_aux.1.valid
theorem erase_max.valid {t} (h : @valid α _ t) : valid (erase_max t) :=
by rw [valid.dual_iff, dual_erase_max]; exact erase_min.valid h.dual
theorem valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂}
(hl : valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.all (λ x, r.all (λ y, x < y)))
(bal : balanced_sz (size l) (size r)) :
valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r :=
begin
cases l with ls ll lx lr, {exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩ },
cases r with rs rl rx rr, {exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩ },
dsimp [glue], split_ifs,
{ rw [split_max_eq, glue],
cases valid'.erase_max_aux hl with v e,
suffices H,
refine ⟨valid'.balance_r v (hr.of_gt _ _) H, _⟩,
{ refine find_max'_all lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp _),
exact λ x h, hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1) },
{ exact @find_max'_all _ (λ a, all (> a) (node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2 },
{ rw [size_balance_r v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1], refl },
{ refine or.inl ⟨_, or.inr e, _⟩,
rwa hl.2.eq_node' at bal } },
{ rw [split_min_eq, glue],
cases valid'.erase_min_aux hr with v e,
suffices H,
refine ⟨valid'.balance_l (hl.of_lt _ _) v H, _⟩,
{ refine @find_min'_all _ (λ a, bounded nil o₁ ↑a) rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp _) hr.1.1.to_nil,
exact λ y h, hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h) },
{ exact @find_min'_all _ (λ a, all (< a) (node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 $ λ x hx, sep.imp $ λ y hy, all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp $ λ y hy, hy.2.1) },
{ rw [size_balance_l hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1], refl },
{ refine or.inr ⟨_, or.inr e, _⟩,
rwa hr.2.eq_node' at bal } },
end
theorem valid'.glue {l x r o₁ o₂}
(hl : valid' o₁ l ↑(x:α)) (hr : valid' ↑x r o₂) :
balanced_sz (size l) (size r) →
valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
theorem valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ}
(h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) : 2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 :=
by linarith
theorem valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : valid' o₁ (@node α ls ll lx lr) o₂)
(hr : valid' o₁ (node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs)
(v : valid' o₁ t ↑rx)
(e : size t = ls + size rl) :
valid' o₁ (balance_l t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (balance_l t rx rr) = ls + rs :=
begin
rw hl.2.1 at e,
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h,
rcases hr.3.1 with H|⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩, {linarith},
suffices H₂, suffices H₁,
refine ⟨valid'.balance_l_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ _, _⟩,
{ rw e, exact or.inl (valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁) },
{ rw [balance_l_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1], simp [add_comm, add_left_comm] },
{ rw [e, add_right_comm], rintro ⟨⟩ },
{ intros _ h₁, rw e, unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢, linarith }
end
theorem valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂}
(hl : valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.all (λ x, r.all (λ y, x < y))) :
valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r :=
begin
induction l with ls ll lx lr IHll IHlr generalizing o₁ o₂ r,
{ exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩ },
induction r with rs rl rx rr IHrl IHrr generalizing o₁ o₂,
{ exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩ },
rw [merge_node], split_ifs,
{ cases IHrl (sep.imp $ λ x h, h.1)
(hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil $ sep.imp $ λ x h, h.2.1) hr.left with v e,
exact valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e },
{ cases IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2 with v e,
have := valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual,
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual,
← dual_balance_r, ← valid'.dual_iff, size_dual, add_comm rs] at this,
exact this e },
{ refine valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩) }
end
theorem valid.merge {l r} (hl : valid l) (hr : valid r)
(sep : l.all (λ x, r.all (λ y, x < y))) : valid (@merge α l r) :=
(valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
theorem insert_with.valid_aux [is_total α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
(f : α → α) (x : α) (hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) : ∀ {t o₁ o₂},
valid' o₁ t o₂ → bounded nil o₁ ↑x → bounded nil ↑x o₂ →
valid' o₁ (insert_with f x t) o₂ ∧
raised (size t) (size (insert_with f x t))
| nil o₁ o₂ _ bl br := ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, or.inr rfl⟩
| (node sz l y r) o₁ o₂ h bl br := begin
rw [insert_with, cmp_le],
split_ifs; rw [insert_with],
{ rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩,
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩,
refine ⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf),
xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, or.inl rfl⟩ },
{ rcases insert_with.valid_aux h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩,
suffices H,
{ refine ⟨vl.balance_l h.right H, _⟩,
rw [size_balance_l vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq],
refine (e.add_right _).add_right _ },
{ exact or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩ } },
{ have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (≤) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1,
rcases insert_with.valid_aux h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩,
suffices H,
{ refine ⟨h.left.balance_r vr H, _⟩,
rw [size_balance_r h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq],
refine (e.add_left _).add_right _ },
{ exact or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩ } },
end
theorem insert_with.valid [is_total α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
(f : α → α) (x : α) (hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x)
{t} (h : valid t) : valid (insert_with f x t) :=
(insert_with.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
theorem insert_eq_insert_with [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
(x : α) : ∀ t, ordnode.insert x t = insert_with (λ _, x) x t
| nil := rfl
| (node _ l y r) := by unfold ordnode.insert insert_with;
cases cmp_le x y; unfold ordnode.insert insert_with; simp [insert_eq_insert_with]
theorem insert.valid [is_total α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
(x : α) {t} (h : valid t) : valid (ordnode.insert x t) :=
by rw insert_eq_insert_with; exact
insert_with.valid _ _ (λ _ _, ⟨le_refl _, le_refl _⟩) h
theorem insert'_eq_insert_with [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
(x : α) : ∀ t, insert' x t = insert_with id x t
| nil := rfl
| (node _ l y r) := by unfold insert' insert_with;
cases cmp_le x y; unfold insert' insert_with; simp [insert'_eq_insert_with]
theorem insert'.valid [is_total α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
(x : α) {t} (h : valid t) : valid (insert' x t) :=
by rw insert'_eq_insert_with; exact insert_with.valid _ _ (λ _, id) h
theorem valid'.map_aux {β} [preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : strict_mono f)
{t a₁ a₂} (h : valid' a₁ t a₂) :
valid' (option.map f a₁) (map f t) (option.map f a₂) ∧ (map f t).size = t.size :=
begin
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂,
{ simp [map], apply valid'_nil,
cases a₁, { trivial },
cases a₂, { trivial },
simp [bounded],
exact f_strict_mono h.ord },
{ have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left,
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right,
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r,
cases t_ih_l' with t_l_valid t_l_size,
cases t_ih_r' with t_r_valid t_r_size,
simp [map],
split,
{ exact and.intro t_l_valid.ord t_r_valid.ord },
{ repeat { split },
{ rw [t_l_size, t_r_size], exact h.sz.1 },
{ exact t_l_valid.sz },
{ exact t_r_valid.sz } },
{ repeat { split },
{ rw [t_l_size, t_r_size], exact h.bal.1 },
{ exact t_l_valid.bal },
{ exact t_r_valid.bal } } },
end
theorem map.valid {β} [preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : strict_mono f)
{t} (h : valid t) : valid (map f t) :=
(valid'.map_aux f_strict_mono h).1
theorem valid'.erase_aux [@decidable_rel α (≤)] (x : α) {t a₁ a₂} (h : valid' a₁ t a₂) :
valid' a₁ (erase x t) a₂ ∧ raised (erase x t).size t.size :=
begin
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂,
{ simp [erase, raised], exact h },
{ simp [erase],
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left,
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right,
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r,
cases t_ih_l' with t_l_valid t_l_size,
cases t_ih_r' with t_r_valid t_r_size,
cases (cmp_le x t_x);
simp [erase._match_1]; rw h.sz.1,
{ suffices h_balanceable,
split,
{ exact valid'.balance_r t_l_valid h.right h_balanceable },
{ rw size_balance_r t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz h_balanceable,
repeat { apply raised.add_right },
exact t_l_size },
{ left, existsi t_l.size, exact (and.intro t_l_size h.bal.1) } },
{ have h_glue := valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1,
cases h_glue with h_glue_valid h_glue_sized,
split,
{ exact h_glue_valid },
{ right, rw h_glue_sized } },
{ suffices h_balanceable,
split,
{ exact valid'.balance_l h.left t_r_valid h_balanceable },
{ rw size_balance_l h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz h_balanceable,
apply raised.add_right,
apply raised.add_left,
exact t_r_size },
{ right, existsi t_r.size, exact (and.intro t_r_size h.bal.1) } } },
end
theorem erase.valid [@decidable_rel α (≤)] (x : α) {t} (h : valid t) : valid (erase x t) :=
(valid'.erase_aux x h).1
theorem size_erase_of_mem [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
{x : α} {t a₁ a₂} (h : valid' a₁ t a₂) (h_mem : x ∈ t) :
size (erase x t) = size t - 1 :=
begin
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ h h_mem,
{ contradiction },
{ have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left,
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right,
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r,
unfold has_mem.mem mem at h_mem,
unfold erase,
cases (cmp_le x t_x);
simp [mem._match_1] at h_mem; simp [erase._match_1],
{ have t_ih_l := t_ih_l' h_mem,
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r',
have t_l_h := valid'.erase_aux x h.left,
cases t_l_h with t_l_valid t_l_size,
rw size_balance_r t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz
(or.inl (exists.intro t_l.size (and.intro t_l_size h.bal.1))),
rw [t_ih_l, h.sz.1],
have h_pos_t_l_size := pos_size_of_mem h.left.sz h_mem,
cases t_l.size with t_l_size, { cases h_pos_t_l_size },
simp [nat.succ_add] },
{ rw [(valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1).2, h.sz.1], refl },
{ have t_ih_r := t_ih_r' h_mem,
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r',
have t_r_h := valid'.erase_aux x h.right,
cases t_r_h with t_r_valid t_r_size,
rw size_balance_l h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz
(or.inr (exists.intro t_r.size (and.intro t_r_size h.bal.1))),
rw [t_ih_r, h.sz.1],
have h_pos_t_r_size := pos_size_of_mem h.right.sz h_mem,
cases t_r.size with t_r_size, { cases h_pos_t_r_size },
simp [nat.succ_add, nat.add_succ] } },
end
end
end ordnode
/-- An `ordset α` is a finite set of values, represented as a tree. The operations on this type
maintain that the tree is balanced and correctly stores subtree sizes at each level. The
correctness property of the tree is baked into the type, so all operations on this type are correct
by construction. -/
def ordset (α : Type*) [preorder α] := {t : ordnode α // t.valid}
namespace ordset
open ordnode
variable [preorder α]
/-- O(1). The empty set. -/
def nil : ordset α := ⟨nil, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
/-- O(1). Get the size of the set. -/
def size (s : ordset α) : ℕ := s.1.size
/-- O(1). Construct a singleton set containing value `a`. -/
protected def singleton (a : α) : ordset α := ⟨singleton a, valid_singleton⟩
instance : has_emptyc (ordset α) := ⟨nil⟩
instance : inhabited (ordset α) := ⟨nil⟩
instance : has_singleton α (ordset α) := ⟨ordset.singleton⟩
/-- O(1). Is the set empty? -/
def empty (s : ordset α) : Prop := s = ∅
theorem empty_iff {s : ordset α} : s = ∅ ↔ s.1.empty :=
⟨λ h, by cases h; exact rfl,
λ h, by cases s; cases s_val; [exact rfl, cases h]⟩
instance : decidable_pred (@empty α _) :=
λ s, decidable_of_iff' _ empty_iff
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, this replaces it. -/
protected def insert [is_total α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (≤)] (x : α) (s : ordset α) : ordset α :=
⟨ordnode.insert x s.1, insert.valid _ s.2⟩
instance [is_total α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (≤)] : has_insert α (ordset α) := ⟨ordset.insert⟩
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, the set is returned as is. -/
def insert' [is_total α (≤)] [@decidable_rel α (≤)] (x : α) (s : ordset α) : ordset α :=
⟨insert' x s.1, insert'.valid _ s.2⟩
section
variables [@decidable_rel α (≤)]
/-- O(log n). Does the set contain the element `x`? That is,
is there an element that is equivalent to `x` in the order? -/
def mem (x : α) (s : ordset α) : bool := x ∈ s.val
/-- O(log n). Retrieve an element in the set that is equivalent to `x` in the order,
if it exists. -/
def find (x : α) (s : ordset α) : option α := ordnode.find x s.val
instance : has_mem α (ordset α) := ⟨λ x s, mem x s⟩
instance mem.decidable (x : α) (s : ordset α) : decidable (x ∈ s) := bool.decidable_eq _ _
theorem pos_size_of_mem {x : α} {t : ordset α} (h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t :=
begin
simp [has_mem.mem, mem] at h_mem,
apply ordnode.pos_size_of_mem t.property.sz h_mem,
end
end
/-- O(log n). Remove an element from the set equivalent to `x`. Does nothing if there
is no such element. -/
def erase [@decidable_rel α (≤)] (x : α) (s : ordset α) : ordset α :=
⟨ordnode.erase x s.val, ordnode.erase.valid x s.property⟩
/-- O(n). Map a function across a tree, without changing the structure. -/
def map {β} [preorder β] (f : α → β) (f_strict_mono : strict_mono f) (s : ordset α) : ordset β :=
⟨ordnode.map f s.val, ordnode.map.valid f_strict_mono s.property⟩
end ordset
|
05b54674720c1b0d2e91e1b88b81221f5fe35d07 | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/data/polynomial/coeff.lean | d08b4e42cd58451ffebafcf0ea515ea71ea3e4f7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,469 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import data.polynomial.basic
import data.finset.nat_antidiagonal
import data.nat.choose.sum
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The theorems include formulas for computing coefficients, such as
`coeff_add`, `coeff_sum`, `coeff_mul`
-/
noncomputable theory
open finsupp finset add_monoid_algebra
open_locale big_operators polynomial
namespace polynomial
universes u v
variables {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
variables [semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section coeff
lemma coeff_one (n : ℕ) : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if 0 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
lemma coeff_add (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p + q) n = coeff p n + coeff q n :=
by { rcases p, rcases q, simp_rw [←of_finsupp_add, coeff], exact finsupp.add_apply _ _ _ }
@[simp] lemma coeff_bit0 (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (bit0 p) n = bit0 (coeff p n) := by simp [bit0]
@[simp] lemma coeff_smul [monoid S] [distrib_mul_action S R] (r : S) (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (r • p) n = r • coeff p n :=
by { rcases p, simp_rw [←of_finsupp_smul, coeff], exact finsupp.smul_apply _ _ _ }
lemma support_smul [monoid S] [distrib_mul_action S R] (r : S) (p : R[X]) :
support (r • p) ⊆ support p :=
begin
assume i hi,
simp [mem_support_iff] at hi ⊢,
contrapose! hi,
simp [hi]
end
/-- `polynomial.sum` as a linear map. -/
@[simps] def lsum {R A M : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring A] [add_comm_monoid M]
[module R A] [module R M] (f : ℕ → A →ₗ[R] M) :
A[X] →ₗ[R] M :=
{ to_fun := λ p, p.sum (λ n r, f n r),
map_add' := λ p q, sum_add_index p q _ (λ n, (f n).map_zero) (λ n _ _, (f n).map_add _ _),
map_smul' := λ c p,
begin
rw [sum_eq_of_subset _ (λ n r, f n r) (λ n, (f n).map_zero) _ (support_smul c p)],
simp only [sum_def, finset.smul_sum, coeff_smul, linear_map.map_smul, ring_hom.id_apply]
end }
variable (R)
/-- The nth coefficient, as a linear map. -/
def lcoeff (n : ℕ) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R :=
{ to_fun := λ p, coeff p n,
map_add' := λ p q, coeff_add p q n,
map_smul' := λ r p, coeff_smul r p n }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma lcoeff_apply (n : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : lcoeff R n f = coeff f n := rfl
@[simp] lemma finset_sum_coeff {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (∑ b in s, f b) n = ∑ b in s, coeff (f b) n :=
(lcoeff R n).map_sum
lemma coeff_sum [semiring S] (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R → S[X]) :
coeff (p.sum f) n = p.sum (λ a b, coeff (f a b) n) :=
by { rcases p, simp [polynomial.sum, support, coeff] }
/-- Decomposes the coefficient of the product `p * q` as a sum
over `nat.antidiagonal`. A version which sums over `range (n + 1)` can be obtained
by using `finset.nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ`. -/
lemma coeff_mul (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (p * q) n = ∑ x in nat.antidiagonal n, coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 :=
begin
rcases p, rcases q,
simp_rw [←of_finsupp_mul, coeff],
exact add_monoid_algebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q n _ (λ x, nat.mem_antidiagonal)
end
@[simp] lemma mul_coeff_zero (p q : R[X]) : coeff (p * q) 0 = coeff p 0 * coeff q 0 :=
by simp [coeff_mul]
/-- `constant_coeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`,
defined as `coeff p 0`. This is a ring homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def constant_coeff : R[X] →+* R :=
{ to_fun := λ p, coeff p 0,
map_one' := coeff_one_zero,
map_mul' := mul_coeff_zero,
map_zero' := coeff_zero 0,
map_add' := λ p q, coeff_add p q 0 }
lemma is_unit_C {x : R} : is_unit (C x) ↔ is_unit x :=
⟨λ h, (congr_arg is_unit coeff_C_zero).mp (h.map $ @constant_coeff R _), λ h, h.map C⟩
lemma coeff_mul_X_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff (p * X) 0 = 0 := by simp
lemma coeff_X_mul_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff (X * p) 0 = 0 := by simp
lemma coeff_C_mul_X_pow (x : R) (k n : ℕ) : coeff (C x * X ^ k : R[X]) n = if n = k then x else 0 :=
by { rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial], congr' 1, simp [eq_comm] }
lemma coeff_C_mul_X (x : R) (n : ℕ) : coeff (C x * X : R[X]) n = if n = 1 then x else 0 :=
by rw [← pow_one X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
@[simp] lemma coeff_C_mul (p : R[X]) : coeff (C a * p) n = a * coeff p n :=
begin
rcases p,
simp_rw [←monomial_zero_left, ←of_finsupp_single, ←of_finsupp_mul, coeff],
exact add_monoid_algebra.single_zero_mul_apply p a n
end
lemma C_mul' (a : R) (f : R[X]) : C a * f = a • f :=
by { ext, rw [coeff_C_mul, coeff_smul, smul_eq_mul] }
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_C (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff (p * C a) n = coeff p n * a :=
begin
rcases p,
simp_rw [←monomial_zero_left, ←of_finsupp_single, ←of_finsupp_mul, coeff],
exact add_monoid_algebra.mul_single_zero_apply p a n
end
lemma coeff_X_pow (k n : ℕ) :
coeff (X^k : R[X]) n = if n = k then 1 else 0 :=
by simp only [one_mul, ring_hom.map_one, ← coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) :
coeff (X^n : R[X]) n = 1 :=
by simp [coeff_X_pow]
section fewnomials
open finset
lemma support_binomial {k m : ℕ} (hkm : k ≠ m) {x y : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m).support = {k, m} :=
begin
apply subset_antisymm (support_binomial' k m x y),
simp_rw [insert_subset, singleton_subset_iff, mem_support_iff, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul,
coeff_X_pow_self, mul_one, coeff_X_pow, if_neg hkm, if_neg hkm.symm,
mul_zero, zero_add, add_zero, ne.def, hx, hy, and_self, not_false_iff],
end
lemma support_trinomial {k m n : ℕ} (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) {x y z : R} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) : (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n).support = {k, m, n} :=
begin
apply subset_antisymm (support_trinomial' k m n x y z),
simp_rw [insert_subset, singleton_subset_iff, mem_support_iff, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul,
coeff_X_pow_self, mul_one, coeff_X_pow, if_neg hkm.ne, if_neg hkm.ne', if_neg hmn.ne,
if_neg hmn.ne', if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne, if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne',
mul_zero, add_zero, zero_add, ne.def, hx, hy, hz, and_self, not_false_iff],
end
lemma card_support_binomial {k m : ℕ} (h : k ≠ m) {x y : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m).support.card = 2 :=
by rw [support_binomial h hx hy, card_insert_of_not_mem (mt mem_singleton.mp h), card_singleton]
lemma card_support_trinomial {k m n : ℕ} (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) {x y z : R} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) : (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n).support.card = 3 :=
by rw [support_trinomial hkm hmn hx hy hz, card_insert_of_not_mem
(mt mem_insert.mp (not_or hkm.ne (mt mem_singleton.mp (hkm.trans hmn).ne))),
card_insert_of_not_mem (mt mem_singleton.mp hmn.ne), card_singleton]
end fewnomials
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff (p * polynomial.X ^ n) (d + n) = coeff p d :=
begin
rw [coeff_mul, sum_eq_single (d,n), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, mul_one],
{ rintros ⟨i,j⟩ h1 h2, rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero], rintro rfl, apply h2,
rw [nat.mem_antidiagonal, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1, subst h1 },
{ exact λ h1, (h1 (nat.mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim }
end
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_mul (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff (polynomial.X ^ n * p) (d + n) = coeff p d :=
by rw [(commute_X_pow p n).eq, coeff_mul_X_pow]
lemma coeff_mul_X_pow' (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) :
(p * X ^ n).coeff d = ite (n ≤ d) (p.coeff (d - n)) 0 :=
begin
split_ifs,
{ rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le h, coeff_mul_X_pow, add_tsub_cancel_right] },
{ refine (coeff_mul _ _ _).trans (finset.sum_eq_zero (λ x hx, _)),
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero],
exact ((le_of_add_le_right (finset.nat.mem_antidiagonal.mp hx).le).trans_lt $ not_le.mp h).ne }
end
lemma coeff_X_pow_mul' (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) :
(X ^ n * p).coeff d = ite (n ≤ d) (p.coeff (d - n)) 0 :=
by rw [(commute_X_pow p n).eq, coeff_mul_X_pow']
@[simp] theorem coeff_mul_X (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (p * X) (n + 1) = coeff p n :=
by simpa only [pow_one] using coeff_mul_X_pow p 1 n
@[simp] theorem coeff_X_mul (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (X * p) (n + 1) = coeff p n := by rw [(commute_X p).eq, coeff_mul_X]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) (r : R) :
coeff (p * monomial n r) (d + n) = coeff p d * r :=
by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ←X_pow_mul, ←mul_assoc, coeff_mul_C, coeff_mul_X_pow]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) (r : R) :
coeff (monomial n r * p) (d + n) = r * coeff p d :=
by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, mul_assoc, coeff_C_mul, X_pow_mul, coeff_mul_X_pow]
-- This can already be proved by `simp`.
theorem coeff_mul_monomial_zero (p : R[X]) (d : ℕ) (r : R) :
coeff (p * monomial 0 r) d = coeff p d * r :=
coeff_mul_monomial p 0 d r
-- This can already be proved by `simp`.
theorem coeff_monomial_zero_mul (p : R[X]) (d : ℕ) (r : R) :
coeff (monomial 0 r * p) d = r * coeff p d :=
coeff_monomial_mul p 0 d r
theorem mul_X_pow_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(H : p * X ^ n = 0) : p = 0 :=
ext $ λ k, (coeff_mul_X_pow p n k).symm.trans $ ext_iff.1 H (k+n)
lemma mul_X_pow_injective (n : ℕ) : function.injective (λ P : R[X], X ^ n * P) :=
begin
intros P Q hPQ,
simp only at hPQ,
ext i,
rw [← coeff_X_pow_mul P n i, hPQ, coeff_X_pow_mul Q n i]
end
lemma mul_X_injective : function.injective (λ P : R[X], X * P) :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ mul_X_pow_injective 1
lemma coeff_X_add_C_pow (r : R) (n k : ℕ) :
((X + C r) ^ n).coeff k = r ^ (n - k) * (n.choose k : R) :=
begin
rw [(commute_X (C r : R[X])).add_pow, ← lcoeff_apply, linear_map.map_sum],
simp only [one_pow, mul_one, lcoeff_apply, ← C_eq_nat_cast, ←C_pow, coeff_mul_C, nat.cast_id],
rw [finset.sum_eq_single k, coeff_X_pow_self, one_mul],
{ intros _ _ h,
simp [coeff_X_pow, h.symm] },
{ simp only [coeff_X_pow_self, one_mul, not_lt, finset.mem_range],
intro h, rw [nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, nat.cast_zero, mul_zero] }
end
lemma coeff_X_add_one_pow (R : Type*) [semiring R] (n k : ℕ) :
((X + 1) ^ n).coeff k = (n.choose k : R) :=
by rw [←C_1, coeff_X_add_C_pow, one_pow, one_mul]
lemma coeff_one_add_X_pow (R : Type*) [semiring R] (n k : ℕ) :
((1 + X) ^ n).coeff k = (n.choose k : R) :=
by rw [add_comm _ X, coeff_X_add_one_pow]
lemma C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : R[X]) :
C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c, rw coeff_C_mul, apply dvd_mul_right },
{ intro h,
choose c hc using h,
classical,
let c' : ℕ → R := λ i, if i ∈ φ.support then c i else 0,
let ψ : R[X] := ∑ i in φ.support, monomial i (c' i),
use ψ,
ext i,
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, mem_support_iff, coeff_monomial,
finset_sum_coeff, finset.sum_ite_eq'],
split_ifs with hi hi,
{ rw hc },
{ rw [not_not] at hi, rwa mul_zero } },
end
lemma coeff_bit0_mul (P Q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (bit0 P * Q) n = 2 * coeff (P * Q) n :=
by simp [bit0, add_mul]
lemma coeff_bit1_mul (P Q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (bit1 P * Q) n = 2 * coeff (P * Q) n + coeff Q n :=
by simp [bit1, add_mul, coeff_bit0_mul]
lemma smul_eq_C_mul (a : R) : a • p = C a * p := by simp [ext_iff]
lemma update_eq_add_sub_coeff {R : Type*} [ring R] (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
p.update n a = p + (polynomial.C (a - p.coeff n) * polynomial.X ^ n) :=
begin
ext,
rw [coeff_update_apply, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul_X_pow],
split_ifs with h;
simp [h]
end
end coeff
section cast
@[simp] lemma nat_cast_coeff_zero {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [semiring R] :
(n : R[X]).coeff 0 = n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp, },
{ simp [ih], },
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_inj
{m n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [semiring R] [char_zero R] : (↑m : R[X]) = ↑n ↔ m = n :=
begin
fsplit,
{ intro h,
apply_fun (λ p, p.coeff 0) at h,
simpa using h, },
{ rintro rfl, refl, },
end
@[simp] lemma int_cast_coeff_zero {i : ℤ} {R : Type*} [ring R] :
(i : R[X]).coeff 0 = i :=
by cases i; simp
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem int_cast_inj
{m n : ℤ} {R : Type*} [ring R] [char_zero R] : (↑m : R[X]) = ↑n ↔ m = n :=
begin
fsplit,
{ intro h,
apply_fun (λ p, p.coeff 0) at h,
simpa using h, },
{ rintro rfl, refl, },
end
end cast
instance [char_zero R] : char_zero R[X] :=
{ cast_injective := λ x y, nat_cast_inj.mp }
end polynomial
|
876c5abd5ee4f7cb4af1cd13ac93dfa9bb0f94be | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /src/Lean/Elab/MutualDef.lean | b6b4dfb3bde9bbb94b9c51de60def791f6c9f022 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,293 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Parser.Term
import Lean.Meta.Closure
import Lean.Meta.Check
import Lean.Meta.Transform
import Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator.Options
import Lean.Elab.Command
import Lean.Elab.Match
import Lean.Elab.DefView
import Lean.Elab.PreDefinition
import Lean.Elab.DeclarationRange
namespace Lean.Elab
open Lean.Parser.Term
/-- `DefView` after elaborating the header. -/
structure DefViewElabHeader where
ref : Syntax
modifiers : Modifiers
/-- Stores whether this is the header of a definition, theorem, ... -/
kind : DefKind
/--
Short name. Recall that all declarations in Lean 4 are potentially recursive. We use `shortDeclName` to refer
to them at `valueStx`, and other declarations in the same mutual block. -/
shortDeclName : Name
/-- Full name for this declaration. This is the name that will be added to the `Environment`. -/
declName : Name
/-- Universe level parameter names explicitly provided by the user. -/
levelNames : List Name
/-- Syntax objects for the binders occurring befor `:`, we use them to populate the `InfoTree` when elaborating `valueStx`. -/
binderIds : Array Syntax
/-- Number of parameters before `:`, it also includes auto-implicit parameters automatically added by Lean. -/
numParams : Nat
/-- Type including parameters. -/
type : Expr
/-- `Syntax` object the body/value of the definition. -/
valueStx : Syntax
deriving Inhabited
namespace Term
open Meta
private def checkModifiers (m₁ m₂ : Modifiers) : TermElabM Unit := do
unless m₁.isUnsafe == m₂.isUnsafe do
throwError "cannot mix unsafe and safe definitions"
unless m₁.isNoncomputable == m₂.isNoncomputable do
throwError "cannot mix computable and non-computable definitions"
unless m₁.isPartial == m₂.isPartial do
throwError "cannot mix partial and non-partial definitions"
private def checkKinds (k₁ k₂ : DefKind) : TermElabM Unit := do
unless k₁.isExample == k₂.isExample do
throwError "cannot mix examples and definitions" -- Reason: we should discard examples
unless k₁.isTheorem == k₂.isTheorem do
throwError "cannot mix theorems and definitions" -- Reason: we will eventually elaborate theorems in `Task`s.
private def check (prevHeaders : Array DefViewElabHeader) (newHeader : DefViewElabHeader) : TermElabM Unit := do
if newHeader.kind.isTheorem && newHeader.modifiers.isUnsafe then
throwError "'unsafe' theorems are not allowed"
if newHeader.kind.isTheorem && newHeader.modifiers.isPartial then
throwError "'partial' theorems are not allowed, 'partial' is a code generation directive"
if newHeader.kind.isTheorem && newHeader.modifiers.isNoncomputable then
throwError "'theorem' subsumes 'noncomputable', code is not generated for theorems"
if newHeader.modifiers.isNoncomputable && newHeader.modifiers.isUnsafe then
throwError "'noncomputable unsafe' is not allowed"
if newHeader.modifiers.isNoncomputable && newHeader.modifiers.isPartial then
throwError "'noncomputable partial' is not allowed"
if newHeader.modifiers.isPartial && newHeader.modifiers.isUnsafe then
throwError "'unsafe' subsumes 'partial'"
if h : 0 < prevHeaders.size then
let firstHeader := prevHeaders.get ⟨0, h⟩
try
unless newHeader.levelNames == firstHeader.levelNames do
throwError "universe parameters mismatch"
checkModifiers newHeader.modifiers firstHeader.modifiers
checkKinds newHeader.kind firstHeader.kind
catch
| .error ref msg => throw (.error ref m!"invalid mutually recursive definitions, {msg}")
| ex => throw ex
else
pure ()
private def registerFailedToInferDefTypeInfo (type : Expr) (ref : Syntax) : TermElabM Unit :=
registerCustomErrorIfMVar type ref "failed to infer definition type"
/--
Return `some [b, c]` if the given `views` are representing a declaration of the form
```
opaque a b c : Nat
``` -/
private def isMultiConstant? (views : Array DefView) : Option (List Name) :=
if views.size == 1 &&
views[0]!.kind == .opaque &&
views[0]!.binders.getArgs.size > 0 &&
views[0]!.binders.getArgs.all (·.isIdent) then
some (views[0]!.binders.getArgs.toList.map (·.getId))
else
none
private def getPendindMVarErrorMessage (views : Array DefView) : String :=
match isMultiConstant? views with
| some ids =>
let idsStr := ", ".intercalate <| ids.map fun id => s!"`{id}`"
let paramsStr := ", ".intercalate <| ids.map fun id => s!"`({id} : _)`"
s!"\nrecall that you cannot declare multiple constants in a single declaration. The identifier(s) {idsStr} are being interpreted as parameters {paramsStr}"
| none =>
"\nwhen the resulting type of a declaration is explicitly provided, all holes (e.g., `_`) in the header are resolved before the declaration body is processed"
/--
Convert terms of the form `OfNat <type> (OfNat.ofNat Nat <num> ..)` into `OfNat <type> <num>`.
We use this method on instance declaration types.
The motivation is to address a recurrent mistake when users forget to use `nat_lit` when declaring `OfNat` instances.
See issues #1389 and #875
-/
private def cleanupOfNat (type : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
Meta.transform type fun e => do
if !e.isAppOfArity ``OfNat 2 then return .visit e
let arg ← instantiateMVars e.appArg!
if !arg.isAppOfArity ``OfNat.ofNat 3 then return .visit e
let argArgs := arg.getAppArgs
if !argArgs[0]!.isConstOf ``Nat then return .visit e
let eNew := mkApp e.appFn! argArgs[1]!
return .done eNew
/-- Elaborate only the declaration headers. We have to elaborate the headers first because we support mutually recursive declarations in Lean 4. -/
private def elabHeaders (views : Array DefView) : TermElabM (Array DefViewElabHeader) := do
let expandedDeclIds ← views.mapM fun view => withRef view.ref do
Term.expandDeclId (← getCurrNamespace) (← getLevelNames) view.declId view.modifiers
withAutoBoundImplicitForbiddenPred (fun n => expandedDeclIds.any (·.shortName == n)) do
let mut headers := #[]
for view in views, ⟨shortDeclName, declName, levelNames⟩ in expandedDeclIds do
let newHeader ← withRef view.ref do
addDeclarationRanges declName view.ref
applyAttributesAt declName view.modifiers.attrs .beforeElaboration
withDeclName declName <| withAutoBoundImplicit <| withLevelNames levelNames <|
elabBindersEx view.binders.getArgs fun xs => do
let refForElabFunType := view.value
let mut type ← match view.type? with
| some typeStx =>
let type ← elabType typeStx
registerFailedToInferDefTypeInfo type typeStx
pure type
| none =>
let hole := mkHole refForElabFunType
let type ← elabType hole
trace[Elab.definition] ">> type: {type}\n{type.mvarId!}"
registerFailedToInferDefTypeInfo type refForElabFunType
pure type
Term.synthesizeSyntheticMVarsNoPostponing
if view.isInstance then
type ← cleanupOfNat type
let (binderIds, xs) := xs.unzip
-- TODO: add forbidden predicate using `shortDeclName` from `views`
let xs ← addAutoBoundImplicits xs
type ← mkForallFVars' xs type
type ← instantiateMVars type
let levelNames ← getLevelNames
if view.type?.isSome then
let pendingMVarIds ← getMVars type
discard <| logUnassignedUsingErrorInfos pendingMVarIds <|
getPendindMVarErrorMessage views
let newHeader := {
ref := view.ref
modifiers := view.modifiers
kind := view.kind
shortDeclName := shortDeclName
declName, type, levelNames, binderIds
numParams := xs.size
valueStx := view.value : DefViewElabHeader }
check headers newHeader
return newHeader
headers := headers.push newHeader
return headers
/--
Create auxiliary local declarations `fs` for the given hearders using their `shortDeclName` and `type`, given hearders, and execute `k fs`.
The new free variables are tagged as `auxDecl`.
Remark: `fs.size = headers.size`.
-/
private partial def withFunLocalDecls {α} (headers : Array DefViewElabHeader) (k : Array Expr → TermElabM α) : TermElabM α :=
let rec loop (i : Nat) (fvars : Array Expr) := do
if h : i < headers.size then
let header := headers.get ⟨i, h⟩
if header.modifiers.isNonrec then
loop (i+1) fvars
else
withAuxDecl header.shortDeclName header.type header.declName fun fvar => loop (i+1) (fvars.push fvar)
else
k fvars
loop 0 #[]
private def expandWhereStructInst : Macro
| `(Parser.Command.whereStructInst|where $[$decls:letDecl];* $[$whereDecls?:whereDecls]?) => do
let letIdDecls ← decls.mapM fun stx => match stx with
| `(letDecl|$_decl:letPatDecl) => Macro.throwErrorAt stx "patterns are not allowed here"
| `(letDecl|$decl:letEqnsDecl) => expandLetEqnsDecl decl (useExplicit := false)
| `(letDecl|$decl:letIdDecl) => pure decl
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
let structInstFields ← letIdDecls.mapM fun
| stx@`(letIdDecl|$id:ident $binders* $[: $ty?]? := $val) => withRef stx do
let mut val := val
if let some ty := ty? then
val ← `(($val : $ty))
val ← if binders.size > 0 then `(fun $binders* => $val) else pure val
`(structInstField|$id:ident := $val)
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
let body ← `({ $structInstFields,* })
match whereDecls? with
| some whereDecls => expandWhereDecls whereDecls body
| none => return body
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-
Recall that
```
def declValSimple := leading_parser " :=\n" >> termParser >> optional Term.whereDecls
def declValEqns := leading_parser Term.matchAltsWhereDecls
def declVal := declValSimple <|> declValEqns <|> Term.whereDecls
```
-/
private def declValToTerm (declVal : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := withRef declVal do
if declVal.isOfKind ``Parser.Command.declValSimple then
expandWhereDeclsOpt declVal[2] declVal[1]
else if declVal.isOfKind ``Parser.Command.declValEqns then
expandMatchAltsWhereDecls declVal[0]
else if declVal.isOfKind ``Parser.Command.whereStructInst then
expandWhereStructInst declVal
else if declVal.isMissing then
Macro.throwErrorAt declVal "declaration body is missing"
else
Macro.throwErrorAt declVal "unexpected declaration body"
private def elabFunValues (headers : Array DefViewElabHeader) : TermElabM (Array Expr) :=
headers.mapM fun header => withDeclName header.declName <| withLevelNames header.levelNames do
let valStx ← liftMacroM <| declValToTerm header.valueStx
forallBoundedTelescope header.type header.numParams fun xs type => do
-- Add new info nodes for new fvars. The server will detect all fvars of a binder by the binder's source location.
for i in [0:header.binderIds.size] do
-- skip auto-bound prefix in `xs`
addLocalVarInfo header.binderIds[i]! xs[header.numParams - header.binderIds.size + i]!
let val ← elabTermEnsuringType valStx type
mkLambdaFVars xs val
private def collectUsed (headers : Array DefViewElabHeader) (values : Array Expr) (toLift : List LetRecToLift)
: StateRefT CollectFVars.State MetaM Unit := do
headers.forM fun header => header.type.collectFVars
values.forM fun val => val.collectFVars
toLift.forM fun letRecToLift => do
letRecToLift.type.collectFVars
letRecToLift.val.collectFVars
private def removeUnusedVars (vars : Array Expr) (headers : Array DefViewElabHeader) (values : Array Expr) (toLift : List LetRecToLift)
: TermElabM (LocalContext × LocalInstances × Array Expr) := do
let (_, used) ← (collectUsed headers values toLift).run {}
removeUnused vars used
private def withUsed {α} (vars : Array Expr) (headers : Array DefViewElabHeader) (values : Array Expr) (toLift : List LetRecToLift)
(k : Array Expr → TermElabM α) : TermElabM α := do
let (lctx, localInsts, vars) ← removeUnusedVars vars headers values toLift
withLCtx lctx localInsts <| k vars
private def isExample (views : Array DefView) : Bool :=
views.any (·.kind.isExample)
private def isTheorem (views : Array DefView) : Bool :=
views.any (·.kind.isTheorem)
private def instantiateMVarsAtHeader (header : DefViewElabHeader) : TermElabM DefViewElabHeader := do
let type ← instantiateMVars header.type
pure { header with type := type }
private def instantiateMVarsAtLetRecToLift (toLift : LetRecToLift) : TermElabM LetRecToLift := do
let type ← instantiateMVars toLift.type
let val ← instantiateMVars toLift.val
pure { toLift with type, val }
private def typeHasRecFun (type : Expr) (funFVars : Array Expr) (letRecsToLift : List LetRecToLift) : Option FVarId :=
let occ? := type.find? fun e => match e with
| Expr.fvar fvarId => funFVars.contains e || letRecsToLift.any fun toLift => toLift.fvarId == fvarId
| _ => false
match occ? with
| some (Expr.fvar fvarId) => some fvarId
| _ => none
private def getFunName (fvarId : FVarId) (letRecsToLift : List LetRecToLift) : TermElabM Name := do
match (← fvarId.findDecl?) with
| some decl => return decl.userName
| none =>
/- Recall that the FVarId of nested let-recs are not in the current local context. -/
match letRecsToLift.findSome? fun toLift => if toLift.fvarId == fvarId then some toLift.shortDeclName else none with
| none => throwError "unknown function"
| some n => return n
/--
Ensures that the of let-rec definition types do not contain functions being defined.
In principle, this test can be improved. We could perform it after we separate the set of functions is strongly connected components.
However, this extra complication doesn't seem worth it.
-/
private def checkLetRecsToLiftTypes (funVars : Array Expr) (letRecsToLift : List LetRecToLift) : TermElabM Unit :=
letRecsToLift.forM fun toLift =>
match typeHasRecFun toLift.type funVars letRecsToLift with
| none => pure ()
| some fvarId => do
let fnName ← getFunName fvarId letRecsToLift
throwErrorAt toLift.ref "invalid type in 'let rec', it uses '{fnName}' which is being defined simultaneously"
namespace MutualClosure
/-- A mapping from FVarId to Set of FVarIds. -/
abbrev UsedFVarsMap := FVarIdMap FVarIdSet
/--
Create the `UsedFVarsMap` mapping that takes the variable id for the mutually recursive functions being defined to the set of
free variables in its definition.
For `mainFVars`, this is just the set of section variables `sectionVars` used.
For nested let-rec functions, we collect their free variables.
Recall that a `let rec` expressions are encoded as follows in the elaborator.
```lean
let rec
f : A := t,
g : B := s;
body
```
is encoded as
```lean
let f : A := ?m₁;
let g : B := ?m₂;
body
```
where `?m₁` and `?m₂` are synthetic opaque metavariables. That are assigned by this module.
We may have nested `let rec`s.
```lean
let rec f : A :=
let rec g : B := t;
s;
body
```
is encoded as
```lean
let f : A := ?m₁;
body
```
and the body of `f` is stored the field `val` of a `LetRecToLift`. For the example above,
we would have a `LetRecToLift` containing:
```
{
mvarId := m₁,
val := `(let g : B := ?m₂; body)
...
}
```
Note that `g` is not a free variable at `(let g : B := ?m₂; body)`. We recover the fact that
`f` depends on `g` because it contains `m₂`
-/
private def mkInitialUsedFVarsMap [Monad m] [MonadMCtx m] (sectionVars : Array Expr) (mainFVarIds : Array FVarId) (letRecsToLift : Array LetRecToLift)
: m UsedFVarsMap := do
let mut sectionVarSet := {}
for var in sectionVars do
sectionVarSet := sectionVarSet.insert var.fvarId!
let mut usedFVarMap := {}
for mainFVarId in mainFVarIds do
usedFVarMap := usedFVarMap.insert mainFVarId sectionVarSet
for toLift in letRecsToLift do
let state := Lean.collectFVars {} toLift.val
let state := Lean.collectFVars state toLift.type
let mut set := state.fvarSet
/- toLift.val may contain metavariables that are placeholders for nested let-recs. We should collect the fvarId
for the associated let-rec because we need this information to compute the fixpoint later. -/
let mvarIds := (toLift.val.collectMVars {}).result
for mvarId in mvarIds do
match (← letRecsToLift.findSomeM? fun (toLift : LetRecToLift) => return if toLift.mvarId == (← getDelayedMVarRoot mvarId) then some toLift.fvarId else none) with
| some fvarId => set := set.insert fvarId
| none => pure ()
usedFVarMap := usedFVarMap.insert toLift.fvarId set
return usedFVarMap
/-!
The let-recs may invoke each other. Example:
```
let rec
f (x : Nat) := g x + y
g : Nat → Nat
| 0 => 1
| x+1 => f x + z
```
`y` is free variable in `f`, and `z` is a free variable in `g`.
To close `f` and `g`, `y` and `z` must be in the closure of both.
That is, we need to generate the top-level definitions.
```
def f (y z x : Nat) := g y z x + y
def g (y z : Nat) : Nat → Nat
| 0 => 1
| x+1 => f y z x + z
```
-/
namespace FixPoint
structure State where
usedFVarsMap : UsedFVarsMap := {}
modified : Bool := false
abbrev M := ReaderT (Array FVarId) $ StateM State
private def isModified : M Bool := do pure (← get).modified
private def resetModified : M Unit := modify fun s => { s with modified := false }
private def markModified : M Unit := modify fun s => { s with modified := true }
private def getUsedFVarsMap : M UsedFVarsMap := do pure (← get).usedFVarsMap
private def modifyUsedFVars (f : UsedFVarsMap → UsedFVarsMap) : M Unit := modify fun s => { s with usedFVarsMap := f s.usedFVarsMap }
-- merge s₂ into s₁
private def merge (s₁ s₂ : FVarIdSet) : M FVarIdSet :=
s₂.foldM (init := s₁) fun s₁ k => do
if s₁.contains k then
return s₁
else
markModified
return s₁.insert k
private def updateUsedVarsOf (fvarId : FVarId) : M Unit := do
let usedFVarsMap ← getUsedFVarsMap
match usedFVarsMap.find? fvarId with
| none => return ()
| some fvarIds =>
let fvarIdsNew ← fvarIds.foldM (init := fvarIds) fun fvarIdsNew fvarId' => do
if fvarId == fvarId' then
return fvarIdsNew
else
match usedFVarsMap.find? fvarId' with
| none => return fvarIdsNew
/- We are being sloppy here `otherFVarIds` may contain free variables that are
not in the context of the let-rec associated with fvarId.
We filter these out-of-context free variables later. -/
| some otherFVarIds => merge fvarIdsNew otherFVarIds
modifyUsedFVars fun usedFVars => usedFVars.insert fvarId fvarIdsNew
private partial def fixpoint : Unit → M Unit
| _ => do
resetModified
let letRecFVarIds ← read
letRecFVarIds.forM updateUsedVarsOf
if (← isModified) then
fixpoint ()
def run (letRecFVarIds : Array FVarId) (usedFVarsMap : UsedFVarsMap) : UsedFVarsMap :=
let (_, s) := fixpoint () |>.run letRecFVarIds |>.run { usedFVarsMap := usedFVarsMap }
s.usedFVarsMap
end FixPoint
abbrev FreeVarMap := FVarIdMap (Array FVarId)
private def mkFreeVarMap [Monad m] [MonadMCtx m]
(sectionVars : Array Expr) (mainFVarIds : Array FVarId)
(recFVarIds : Array FVarId) (letRecsToLift : Array LetRecToLift) : m FreeVarMap := do
let usedFVarsMap ← mkInitialUsedFVarsMap sectionVars mainFVarIds letRecsToLift
let letRecFVarIds := letRecsToLift.map fun toLift => toLift.fvarId
let usedFVarsMap := FixPoint.run letRecFVarIds usedFVarsMap
let mut freeVarMap := {}
for toLift in letRecsToLift do
let lctx := toLift.lctx
let fvarIdsSet := usedFVarsMap.find? toLift.fvarId |>.get!
let fvarIds := fvarIdsSet.fold (init := #[]) fun fvarIds fvarId =>
if lctx.contains fvarId && !recFVarIds.contains fvarId then
fvarIds.push fvarId
else
fvarIds
freeVarMap := freeVarMap.insert toLift.fvarId fvarIds
return freeVarMap
structure ClosureState where
newLocalDecls : Array LocalDecl := #[]
localDecls : Array LocalDecl := #[]
newLetDecls : Array LocalDecl := #[]
exprArgs : Array Expr := #[]
private def pickMaxFVar? (lctx : LocalContext) (fvarIds : Array FVarId) : Option FVarId :=
fvarIds.getMax? fun fvarId₁ fvarId₂ => (lctx.get! fvarId₁).index < (lctx.get! fvarId₂).index
private def preprocess (e : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let e ← instantiateMVars e
-- which let-decls are dependent. We say a let-decl is dependent if its lambda abstraction is type incorrect.
Meta.check e
pure e
/-- Push free variables in `s` to `toProcess` if they are not already there. -/
private def pushNewVars (toProcess : Array FVarId) (s : CollectFVars.State) : Array FVarId :=
s.fvarSet.fold (init := toProcess) fun toProcess fvarId =>
if toProcess.contains fvarId then toProcess else toProcess.push fvarId
private def pushLocalDecl (toProcess : Array FVarId) (fvarId : FVarId) (userName : Name) (type : Expr) (bi := BinderInfo.default)
: StateRefT ClosureState TermElabM (Array FVarId) := do
let type ← preprocess type
modify fun s => { s with
newLocalDecls := s.newLocalDecls.push <| LocalDecl.cdecl default fvarId userName type bi
exprArgs := s.exprArgs.push (mkFVar fvarId)
}
return pushNewVars toProcess (collectFVars {} type)
private partial def mkClosureForAux (toProcess : Array FVarId) : StateRefT ClosureState TermElabM Unit := do
let lctx ← getLCtx
match pickMaxFVar? lctx toProcess with
| none => return ()
| some fvarId =>
trace[Elab.definition.mkClosure] "toProcess: {toProcess.map mkFVar}, maxVar: {mkFVar fvarId}"
let toProcess := toProcess.erase fvarId
let localDecl ← fvarId.getDecl
match localDecl with
| .cdecl _ _ userName type bi =>
let toProcess ← pushLocalDecl toProcess fvarId userName type bi
mkClosureForAux toProcess
| .ldecl _ _ userName type val _ =>
let zetaFVarIds ← getZetaFVarIds
if !zetaFVarIds.contains fvarId then
/- Non-dependent let-decl. See comment at src/Lean/Meta/Closure.lean -/
let toProcess ← pushLocalDecl toProcess fvarId userName type
mkClosureForAux toProcess
else
/- Dependent let-decl. -/
let type ← preprocess type
let val ← preprocess val
modify fun s => { s with
newLetDecls := s.newLetDecls.push <| LocalDecl.ldecl default fvarId userName type val false,
/- We don't want to interleave let and lambda declarations in our closure. So, we expand any occurrences of fvarId
at `newLocalDecls` and `localDecls` -/
newLocalDecls := s.newLocalDecls.map (·.replaceFVarId fvarId val)
localDecls := s.localDecls.map (·.replaceFVarId fvarId val)
}
mkClosureForAux (pushNewVars toProcess (collectFVars (collectFVars {} type) val))
private partial def mkClosureFor (freeVars : Array FVarId) (localDecls : Array LocalDecl) : TermElabM ClosureState := do
let (_, s) ← mkClosureForAux freeVars |>.run { localDecls := localDecls }
return { s with
newLocalDecls := s.newLocalDecls.reverse
newLetDecls := s.newLetDecls.reverse
exprArgs := s.exprArgs.reverse
}
structure LetRecClosure where
ref : Syntax
localDecls : Array LocalDecl
/-- Expression used to replace occurrences of the let-rec `FVarId`. -/
closed : Expr
toLift : LetRecToLift
private def mkLetRecClosureFor (toLift : LetRecToLift) (freeVars : Array FVarId) : TermElabM LetRecClosure := do
let lctx := toLift.lctx
withLCtx lctx toLift.localInstances do
lambdaTelescope toLift.val fun xs val => do
/-
Recall that `toLift.type` and `toLift.value` may have different binder annotations.
See issue #1377 for an example.
-/
let userNameAndBinderInfos ← forallBoundedTelescope toLift.type xs.size fun xs _ =>
xs.mapM fun x => do
let localDecl ← x.fvarId!.getDecl
return (localDecl.userName, localDecl.binderInfo)
/- Auxiliary map for preserving binder user-facind names and `BinderInfo` for types. -/
let mut userNameBinderInfoMap : FVarIdMap (Name × BinderInfo) := {}
for x in xs, (userName, bi) in userNameAndBinderInfos do
userNameBinderInfoMap := userNameBinderInfoMap.insert x.fvarId! (userName, bi)
let type ← instantiateForall toLift.type xs
let lctx ← getLCtx
let s ← mkClosureFor freeVars <| xs.map fun x => lctx.get! x.fvarId!
/- Apply original type binder info and user-facing names to local declarations. -/
let typeLocalDecls := s.localDecls.map fun localDecl =>
if let some (userName, bi) := userNameBinderInfoMap.find? localDecl.fvarId then
localDecl.setBinderInfo bi |>.setUserName userName
else
localDecl
let type := Closure.mkForall typeLocalDecls <| Closure.mkForall s.newLetDecls type
let val := Closure.mkLambda s.localDecls <| Closure.mkLambda s.newLetDecls val
let c := mkAppN (Lean.mkConst toLift.declName) s.exprArgs
toLift.mvarId.assign c
return {
ref := toLift.ref
localDecls := s.newLocalDecls
closed := c
toLift := { toLift with val, type }
}
private def mkLetRecClosures (sectionVars : Array Expr) (mainFVarIds : Array FVarId) (recFVarIds : Array FVarId) (letRecsToLift : Array LetRecToLift) : TermElabM (List LetRecClosure) := do
-- Compute the set of free variables (excluding `recFVarIds`) for each let-rec.
let mut letRecsToLift := letRecsToLift
let mut freeVarMap ← mkFreeVarMap sectionVars mainFVarIds recFVarIds letRecsToLift
let mut result := #[]
for i in [:letRecsToLift.size] do
if letRecsToLift[i]!.val.hasExprMVar then
-- This can happen when this particular let-rec has nested let-rec that have been resolved in previous iterations.
-- This code relies on the fact that nested let-recs occur before the outer most let-recs at `letRecsToLift`.
-- Unresolved nested let-recs appear as metavariables before they are resolved. See `assignExprMVar` at `mkLetRecClosureFor`
let valNew ← instantiateMVars letRecsToLift[i]!.val
letRecsToLift := letRecsToLift.modify i fun t => { t with val := valNew }
-- We have to recompute the `freeVarMap` in this case. This overhead should not be an issue in practice.
freeVarMap ← mkFreeVarMap sectionVars mainFVarIds recFVarIds letRecsToLift
let toLift := letRecsToLift[i]!
result := result.push (← mkLetRecClosureFor toLift (freeVarMap.find? toLift.fvarId).get!)
return result.toList
/-- Mapping from FVarId of mutually recursive functions being defined to "closure" expression. -/
abbrev Replacement := FVarIdMap Expr
def insertReplacementForMainFns (r : Replacement) (sectionVars : Array Expr) (mainHeaders : Array DefViewElabHeader) (mainFVars : Array Expr) : Replacement :=
mainFVars.size.fold (init := r) fun i r =>
r.insert mainFVars[i]!.fvarId! (mkAppN (Lean.mkConst mainHeaders[i]!.declName) sectionVars)
def insertReplacementForLetRecs (r : Replacement) (letRecClosures : List LetRecClosure) : Replacement :=
letRecClosures.foldl (init := r) fun r c =>
r.insert c.toLift.fvarId c.closed
def Replacement.apply (r : Replacement) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
e.replace fun e => match e with
| .fvar fvarId => match r.find? fvarId with
| some c => some c
| _ => none
| _ => none
def pushMain (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) (sectionVars : Array Expr) (mainHeaders : Array DefViewElabHeader) (mainVals : Array Expr)
: TermElabM (Array PreDefinition) :=
mainHeaders.size.foldM (init := preDefs) fun i preDefs => do
let header := mainHeaders[i]!
let value ← mkLambdaFVars sectionVars mainVals[i]!
let type ← mkForallFVars sectionVars header.type
return preDefs.push {
ref := getDeclarationSelectionRef header.ref
kind := header.kind
declName := header.declName
levelParams := [], -- we set it later
modifiers := header.modifiers
type, value
}
def pushLetRecs (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) (letRecClosures : List LetRecClosure) (kind : DefKind) (modifiers : Modifiers) : Array PreDefinition :=
letRecClosures.foldl (init := preDefs) fun preDefs c =>
let type := Closure.mkForall c.localDecls c.toLift.type
let value := Closure.mkLambda c.localDecls c.toLift.val
preDefs.push {
ref := c.ref
declName := c.toLift.declName
levelParams := [] -- we set it later
modifiers := { modifiers with attrs := c.toLift.attrs }
kind, type, value
}
def getKindForLetRecs (mainHeaders : Array DefViewElabHeader) : DefKind :=
if mainHeaders.any fun h => h.kind.isTheorem then DefKind.«theorem»
else DefKind.«def»
def getModifiersForLetRecs (mainHeaders : Array DefViewElabHeader) : Modifiers := {
isNoncomputable := mainHeaders.any fun h => h.modifiers.isNoncomputable
recKind := if mainHeaders.any fun h => h.modifiers.isPartial then RecKind.partial else RecKind.default
isUnsafe := mainHeaders.any fun h => h.modifiers.isUnsafe
}
/--
- `sectionVars`: The section variables used in the `mutual` block.
- `mainHeaders`: The elaborated header of the top-level definitions being defined by the mutual block.
- `mainFVars`: The auxiliary variables used to represent the top-level definitions being defined by the mutual block.
- `mainVals`: The elaborated value for the top-level definitions
- `letRecsToLift`: The let-rec's definitions that need to be lifted
-/
def main (sectionVars : Array Expr) (mainHeaders : Array DefViewElabHeader) (mainFVars : Array Expr) (mainVals : Array Expr) (letRecsToLift : List LetRecToLift)
: TermElabM (Array PreDefinition) := do
-- Store in recFVarIds the fvarId of every function being defined by the mutual block.
let letRecsToLift := letRecsToLift.toArray
let mainFVarIds := mainFVars.map Expr.fvarId!
let recFVarIds := (letRecsToLift.map fun toLift => toLift.fvarId) ++ mainFVarIds
resetZetaFVarIds
withTrackingZeta do
-- By checking `toLift.type` and `toLift.val` we populate `zetaFVarIds`. See comments at `src/Lean/Meta/Closure.lean`.
let letRecsToLift ← letRecsToLift.mapM fun toLift => withLCtx toLift.lctx toLift.localInstances do
Meta.check toLift.type
Meta.check toLift.val
return { toLift with val := (← instantiateMVars toLift.val), type := (← instantiateMVars toLift.type) }
let letRecClosures ← mkLetRecClosures sectionVars mainFVarIds recFVarIds letRecsToLift
-- mkLetRecClosures assign metavariables that were placeholders for the lifted declarations.
let mainVals ← mainVals.mapM (instantiateMVars ·)
let mainHeaders ← mainHeaders.mapM instantiateMVarsAtHeader
let letRecClosures ← letRecClosures.mapM fun closure => do pure { closure with toLift := (← instantiateMVarsAtLetRecToLift closure.toLift) }
-- Replace fvarIds for functions being defined with closed terms
let r := insertReplacementForMainFns {} sectionVars mainHeaders mainFVars
let r := insertReplacementForLetRecs r letRecClosures
let mainVals := mainVals.map r.apply
let mainHeaders := mainHeaders.map fun h => { h with type := r.apply h.type }
let letRecClosures := letRecClosures.map fun c => { c with toLift := { c.toLift with type := r.apply c.toLift.type, val := r.apply c.toLift.val } }
let letRecKind := getKindForLetRecs mainHeaders
let letRecMods := getModifiersForLetRecs mainHeaders
pushMain (pushLetRecs #[] letRecClosures letRecKind letRecMods) sectionVars mainHeaders mainVals
end MutualClosure
private def getAllUserLevelNames (headers : Array DefViewElabHeader) : List Name :=
if h : 0 < headers.size then
-- Recall that all top-level functions must have the same levels. See `check` method above
(headers.get ⟨0, h⟩).levelNames
else
[]
/-- Eagerly convert universe metavariables occurring in theorem headers to universe parameters. -/
private def levelMVarToParamHeaders (views : Array DefView) (headers : Array DefViewElabHeader) : TermElabM (Array DefViewElabHeader) := do
let rec process : StateRefT Nat TermElabM (Array DefViewElabHeader) := do
let mut newHeaders := #[]
for view in views, header in headers do
if view.kind.isTheorem then
newHeaders := newHeaders.push { header with type := (← levelMVarToParam' header.type) }
else
newHeaders := newHeaders.push header
return newHeaders
let newHeaders ← (process).run' 1
newHeaders.mapM fun header => return { header with type := (← instantiateMVars header.type) }
/-- Result for `mkInst?` -/
structure MkInstResult where
instVal : Expr
instType : Expr
outParams : Array Expr := #[]
/--
Construct an instance for `className out₁ ... outₙ type`.
The method support classes with a prefix of `outParam`s (e.g. `MonadReader`). -/
private partial def mkInst? (className : Name) (type : Expr) : MetaM (Option MkInstResult) := do
let rec go? (instType instTypeType : Expr) (outParams : Array Expr) : MetaM (Option MkInstResult) := do
let instTypeType ← whnfD instTypeType
unless instTypeType.isForall do
return none
let d := instTypeType.bindingDomain!
if d.isOutParam then
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar d
go? (mkApp instType mvar) (instTypeType.bindingBody!.instantiate1 mvar) (outParams.push mvar)
else
unless (← isDefEqGuarded (← inferType type) d) do
return none
let instType ← instantiateMVars (mkApp instType type)
let instVal ← synthInstance instType
return some { instVal, instType, outParams }
let instType ← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels className
go? instType (← inferType instType) #[]
def processDefDeriving (className : Name) (declName : Name) : TermElabM Bool := do
try
let ConstantInfo.defnInfo info ← getConstInfo declName | return false
let some result ← mkInst? className info.value | return false
let instTypeNew := mkApp result.instType.appFn! (Lean.mkConst declName (info.levelParams.map mkLevelParam))
Meta.check instTypeNew
let instName ← liftMacroM <| mkUnusedBaseName (declName.appendBefore "inst" |>.appendAfter className.getString!)
addAndCompile <| Declaration.defnDecl {
name := instName
levelParams := info.levelParams
type := (← instantiateMVars instTypeNew)
value := (← instantiateMVars result.instVal)
hints := info.hints
safety := info.safety
}
addInstance instName AttributeKind.global (eval_prio default)
return true
catch _ =>
return false
/-- Remove auxiliary match discriminant let-declarations. -/
def eraseAuxDiscr (e : Expr) : CoreM Expr := do
Core.transform e fun e => match e with
| Expr.letE n _ v b .. =>
if isAuxDiscrName n then
return TransformStep.visit (b.instantiate1 v)
else
return TransformStep.visit e
| e => return TransformStep.visit e
partial def checkForHiddenUnivLevels (allUserLevelNames : List Name) (preDefs : Array PreDefinition) : TermElabM Unit :=
unless (← MonadLog.hasErrors) do
-- We do not report this kind of error if the declaration already contains errors
let mut sTypes : CollectLevelParams.State := {}
let mut sValues : CollectLevelParams.State := {}
for preDef in preDefs do
sTypes := collectLevelParams sTypes preDef.type
sValues := collectLevelParams sValues preDef.value
if sValues.params.all fun u => sTypes.params.contains u || allUserLevelNames.contains u then
-- If all universe level occurring in values also occur in types or explicitly provided universes, then everything is fine
-- and we just return
return ()
let checkPreDef (preDef : PreDefinition) : TermElabM Unit :=
-- Otherwise, we try to produce an error message containing the expression with the offending universe
let rec visitLevel (u : Level) : ReaderT Expr TermElabM Unit := do
match u with
| .succ u => visitLevel u
| .imax u v | .max u v => visitLevel u; visitLevel v
| .param n =>
unless sTypes.visitedLevel.contains u || allUserLevelNames.contains n do
let parent ← withOptions (fun o => pp.universes.set o true) do addMessageContext m!"{indentExpr (← read)}"
let body ← withOptions (fun o => pp.letVarTypes.setIfNotSet (pp.funBinderTypes.setIfNotSet o true) true) do addMessageContext m!"{indentExpr preDef.value}"
throwError "invalid occurrence of universe level '{u}' at '{preDef.declName}', it does not occur at the declaration type, nor it is explicit universe level provided by the user, occurring at expression{parent}\nat declaration body{body}"
| _ => pure ()
let rec visit (e : Expr) : ReaderT Expr (MonadCacheT ExprStructEq Unit TermElabM) Unit := do
checkCache { val := e : ExprStructEq } fun _ => do
match e with
| .forallE n d b c | .lam n d b c => visit d e; withLocalDecl n c d fun x => visit (b.instantiate1 x) e
| .letE n t v b _ => visit t e; visit v e; withLetDecl n t v fun x => visit (b.instantiate1 x) e
| .app .. => e.withApp fun f args => do visit f e; args.forM fun arg => visit arg e
| .mdata _ b => visit b e
| .proj _ _ b => visit b e
| .sort u => visitLevel u (← read)
| .const _ us => us.forM (visitLevel · (← read))
| _ => pure ()
visit preDef.value preDef.value |>.run {}
for preDef in preDefs do
checkPreDef preDef
def elabMutualDef (vars : Array Expr) (views : Array DefView) (hints : TerminationHints) : TermElabM Unit :=
if isExample views then
withoutModifyingEnv go
else
go
where
go := do
let scopeLevelNames ← getLevelNames
let headers ← elabHeaders views
let headers ← levelMVarToParamHeaders views headers
let allUserLevelNames := getAllUserLevelNames headers
withFunLocalDecls headers fun funFVars => do
for view in views, funFVar in funFVars do
addLocalVarInfo view.declId funFVar
let values ←
try
let values ← elabFunValues headers
Term.synthesizeSyntheticMVarsNoPostponing
values.mapM (instantiateMVars ·)
catch ex =>
logException ex
headers.mapM fun header => mkSorry header.type (synthetic := true)
let headers ← headers.mapM instantiateMVarsAtHeader
let letRecsToLift ← getLetRecsToLift
let letRecsToLift ← letRecsToLift.mapM instantiateMVarsAtLetRecToLift
checkLetRecsToLiftTypes funFVars letRecsToLift
withUsed vars headers values letRecsToLift fun vars => do
let preDefs ← MutualClosure.main vars headers funFVars values letRecsToLift
for preDef in preDefs do
trace[Elab.definition] "{preDef.declName} : {preDef.type} :=\n{preDef.value}"
let preDefs ← levelMVarToParamPreDecls preDefs
let preDefs ← instantiateMVarsAtPreDecls preDefs
let preDefs ← fixLevelParams preDefs scopeLevelNames allUserLevelNames
let preDefs ← preDefs.mapM fun preDef =>
if preDef.kind.isTheorem || preDef.kind.isExample then
return preDef
else
return { preDef with value := (← eraseAuxDiscr preDef.value) }
for preDef in preDefs do
trace[Elab.definition] "after eraseAuxDiscr, {preDef.declName} : {preDef.type} :=\n{preDef.value}"
checkForHiddenUnivLevels allUserLevelNames preDefs
addPreDefinitions preDefs hints
processDeriving headers
processDeriving (headers : Array DefViewElabHeader) := do
for header in headers, view in views do
if let some classNamesStx := view.deriving? then
for classNameStx in classNamesStx do
let className ← resolveGlobalConstNoOverload classNameStx
withRef classNameStx do
unless (← processDefDeriving className header.declName) do
throwError "failed to synthesize instance '{className}' for '{header.declName}'"
end Term
namespace Command
def elabMutualDef (ds : Array Syntax) (hints : TerminationHints) : CommandElabM Unit := do
let views ← ds.mapM fun d => do
let modifiers ← elabModifiers d[0]
if ds.size > 1 && modifiers.isNonrec then
throwErrorAt d "invalid use of 'nonrec' modifier in 'mutual' block"
mkDefView modifiers d[1]
runTermElabM fun vars => Term.elabMutualDef vars views hints
end Command
end Lean.Elab
|
9a0907b28a5eeb53f442e5cc9557739bab4a8b0d | 076f5040b63237c6dd928c6401329ed5adcb0e44 | /answers/hw4_recursion_inductive.lean | 065bc68f7b2da6bdac8e44f63024d291d4ea68f0 | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/uva-cs-dm-f19 | 0f123689cf6cb078f263950b18382a7086bf30be | 09a950752884bd7ade4be33e9e89a2c4b1927167 | refs/heads/master | 1,594,771,841,541 | 1,575,853,850,000 | 1,575,853,850,000 | 205,433,890 | 4 | 9 | null | 1,571,592,121,000 | 1,567,188,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,823 | lean | /-
CS 2102, Fall 2019, Sullivan sections.
Inductive type definitions, recursive
functions, and higher-order functions.
-/
/-
Problem #1. We give you a simple "natural
number arithmetic abstract data type based
on our own mnat type for representing the
natural numbers. You are to extend it by
adding definitions of several operations
(functions).
The first is a boolean "less than"
operator. It will take two natural
numbers and return true (tt) if and only
if the first is less than the second
(otherwise it will return false).
The second function will implement mnat
multiplication. It will use recursion and
the given definition of mnat addition.
The third function will implement the
factorial function using the mnat type.
The factorial of zero is one and the
factorial of any number n = 1 + n' is
n times the factorial of n'.
-/
-- Here's the logic we've already covered.
inductive mnat : Type
| zero
| succ : mnat → mnat
open mnat
-- an increment function
-- takes mnat, returns one greater nmat
def inc : mnat → mnat :=
λ n : mnat, succ n
-- alternative syntax (c-style)
def inc' (n : mnat) : mnat :=
succ n
-- is_zero predicate
-- return tt iff and only if mnat is zero
def is_zero : mnat → bool
| zero := tt
| _ := ff
-- predecessor
-- returns zero when mnat is zero
-- else returns one less than given mnat
def pred : mnat → mnat
| zero := zero
| (succ m) := m
-- equality predicate
-- tt if given mnats are equal else ff
def eq_mnat : mnat → mnat → bool
| zero zero := tt
| zero (succ m) := ff
| (succ m) zero := ff
| (succ m) (succ n) := eq_mnat m n
-- mnat addition
-- by cases on first argument
-- zero + any m returns m
-- (1 + n') + m returns 1 + (m' + n)
-- understand why the recursion terminates
def add_mnat : mnat → mnat → mnat
| zero m := m
| (succ n') m := succ (add_mnat n' m)
/- [10 points]
#1A. Implement an mnat "less than"
predicate by completing the following
definition. Fill in the placeholders.
-/
def lt_mnat : mnat → mnat → bool
| zero zero := ff
| zero _ := tt
| (succ n') zero := ff
| (succ n') (succ m') := lt_mnat n' m'
-- We give you shorthand names for a few mnats
def mzero := zero
def mone := succ zero
def mtwo := succ (succ zero)
def mthree := succ (succ (succ zero))
def mfour := succ mthree
-- When you succeed, the following tests
-- should all give the right answers.
#reduce lt_mnat mzero mzero
#reduce lt_mnat mzero mtwo
#reduce lt_mnat mtwo mtwo
#reduce lt_mnat mtwo zero
#reduce lt_mnat mtwo mthree
#reduce lt_mnat mthree mtwo
/- [10 points]
#1B. Implement an mnat multiplication
function by completing the following
definition. Hint: use the distributive
law. What is (1 + n') * m? Also be sure
you see why the recursion terminates in
all cases.
-/
-- Answer
def mult_mnat : mnat → mnat → mnat
| zero _ := zero
| (succ n') m := add_mnat m (mult_mnat n' m)
-- When you succeed you should get
-- the right answers for these tests
#reduce mult_mnat mzero mzero
#reduce mult_mnat mzero mthree
#reduce mult_mnat mthree mzero
#reduce mult_mnat mtwo mthree
#reduce mult_mnat mthree mtwo
#reduce mult_mnat mthree mthree
/- [10 points]
#1C. Implement the factorial function
using the mnat type. Call your function
fac_mnat. Give a definition by cases using
recursion, in the style of the preceding
examples.
-/
-- Your code here
def fac_mnat : mnat → mnat
| zero := (succ zero)
| (succ n') := mult_mnat (succ n') (fac_mnat n')
-- Add test cases for zero, one, and
-- some larger argument values and check
-- that you're getting the right answers.
-- Here
-- Test
#reduce fac_mnat mzero
#reduce fac_mnat mone
#reduce fac_mnat mthree
/-
#2. Inductive data type definitions.
For this problem, you will extend a
very simple "list of natural numbers"
abstract data type. The technical term
for a list is a "sequence". You will
first read understand a list_nat data
type and you will then define several
functions that operate on values of
this type. As you work through these
problems, note their similarity to
comparable functions involving the
natural numbers (such as is_zero,
succ, pred, and add).
-/
/-
The following inductive definition
defines a set of terms. The base case is
nil, representing an empty list of mnat.
The cons constructor on the other hand
takes an mnat (let's call it h) and any
list of mnats (call it t) and returns the
term, (cons h t), which we interpret as a
one-longer list with h at its "head" and
the one-smaller list, l, as its "tail").
-/
inductive list_mnat : Type
| nil
| cons : mnat → list_mnat → list_mnat
open list_mnat
-- Here are two list definitions using
-- our new data type
-- representation of an empty list
def empty_list := nil
-- representation of the list [1, 2, 3]
def one_two_three :=
cons
mone
(cons
mtwo
(cons
mthree
nil
)
)
/-
2A. [10 points]
Define three_four to represent the
list [3, 4].
-/
-- Here
def three_four :=
cons mthree
(
cons
mfour
nil
)
-- or equivalent
/-
#2B. [10 points]
Implement a predicate function,
is_empty, that takes a list_mnat and
returns true if an only if it's empty,
otherwise false. Remember once again
that a "predicate" function is one
that returns a Boolean true or false
value depending on whether the argument
to which it is applied has a specified
property or not. Here the property is
that of being an empty list, or not.
-/
-- Your answer here
def is_empty : list_mnat → bool
| nil := tt
| _ := ff
/-
#2C. [10 points]
Implement a prepend_mnat function
that takes an mnat, h, and a list_mnat,
t, and that returns a new list with h
as the value at the head of the list
and t as the "rest" of the new list (its
"tail").
-/
-- Your answer here
def prepend_mnat : mnat → list_mnat → list_mnat
| h t := cons h t
/-
#2D. [10 points]
Implement a "length_mnat" function
that takes any list_mnat and returns its
length represented as a value of type mnat.
The length of the empty list is zero and
the length of a non-empty list, (cons h t),
is one more than the length of t.
-/
def length_mnat : list_mnat → mnat
| nil := zero
| (cons h t) := succ (length_mnat t)
/-
2F. [Extra Credit]
Implement an append_mnat function.
It takes two list_mnat values and returns
a new one, which is the first appended
to (and followed by) the second. So, for
example, the list [1, 2] appended to the
list [3, 4, 5] should return the list,
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Of course you won't be
using this nice list notation, just the
constructors we've defined.
To understand how to solve this problem,
start by really thoroughly seeing how the
addition function for mnats works. It
uses recursion on the *first* of the two
arguments. If the first argument is zero,
it returns the second argument without
change. Similarly, here, if the first list
is nil, the result is the second list. If
the first list is not nil, then it must
be of the form (cons h t). In this case,
the head of the new list will be h. What
will be the tail of the new list?
-/
-- Your answer here
def append_mnat : list_mnat → list_mnat → list_mnat
| nil l := l
| (cons h t) l := cons h (append_mnat t l)
/-
Add tests where the first list is nil and
not nil, and make sure you're getting the
right answers.
-/
#reduce append_mnat one_two_three three_four
/-
#3. Higher-Order Functions
Lean's library-provided polymorphic list type
is implemented in essentially the same way as
the list_mnat type you used in the preceding
questions. The main difference is that the
type of elements in a Lean list is given as
a parameter to the "list" type. We covered
the use of Lean's (polymorphic) list type
in class. Review your notes if necessary.
-/
/-
3A. [10 points] Provide an implementatation of
a function, map_pred. This function will take
as its arguments (1) any predicate function of
type ℕ → bool, (2) any list of natural numbers
(of type "list nat"). It will then return a new
list in which each ℕ value in the given list is
replaced by true (tt) if the predicate returns
true for that value, and otherwise by false (ff).
For example, if the predicate function returns
true if and only if its argument is zero, then
applying map to this function and to the list
[0,1,2,0,1,0] must return [tt,ff,ff,tt,ff,tt].
Test your code by using #eval or #reduce to evaluate
an expression in which map_pred is applied to
such an "is_zero" predicate function and to the
list 0,1,2,0,1,0]. Express the predicate function
as a lambda abstraction within the #eval command.
NOTE: You will have to use list.nil and list.cons
to refer to the nil and cons constructors of the
library-provided list data type, as you already
have definitions for list and cons in the current
namespace.
-/
-- Answer here
def map_pred : (ℕ → bool) → list nat → list bool
| f list.nil := list.nil
| f (list.cons h t) := list.cons (f h) (map_pred f t)
#eval map_pred (λ n, n = 0) [0,1,2,3,0,5]
/-
3B. [5points] Implement a function, reduce_or,
that takes as its argument a list of Boolean values
and that reduces the list to a single Boolean value:
tt if there is at least one true value in the list,
otherwise ff. Note: the Lean libraries provide the
function "bor" to compute "b1 or b2", where b1 and
b2 are Booleans. We recommend that you include
tests of your solution.
-/
-- example
#reduce bor tt tt
-- Answer here
def reduce_or : list bool → bool
| list.nil := ff
| (list.cons h t) := bor h (reduce_or t)
/-
3C. [5 points] Implement a function, reduce_and,
that takes as its argument a list of Boolean values
and that reduces the list to a single Boolean value:
tt if every value in the list is true, otherwise ff.
-/
-- Note: band implements the Boolean "and" function
#reduce band tt tt
-- Answer here
def reduce_and : list bool → bool
| list.nil := tt
| (list.cons h t) := band h (reduce_and t)
#reduce reduce_and list.nil
#reduce reduce_and [tt,tt,ff]
/-
3D. [10 points] Define a function, all_zero, that
takes a list of nat values and returns true if and
only if they are all zero. Express your answer using
map and reduce functions that you have previously
defined above. Again we recommend that you test your
solution.
-/
-- Answer here
def all_zero : list nat → bool
| list.nil := tt
| l :=
reduce_and
(
map_pred (λ n, n = 0) l
)
-- some tests
#reduce all_zero []
#reduce all_zero [0,0,0,0]
#reduce all_zero [1,0,0,0]
#reduce all_zero [0,1,0,0]
#reduce all_zero [1,0,0,1]
/-
This is the end of the homework. Please
be sure to save your file before uploading
then check that you uploaded correctly. We
cannot accept work submitted incorrectly
or late, so take a minute to be sure you
got it right. Thank you!
-/
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.