blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05be2a35c3bca031afc7db283a0f8f26ac45ef47 | 302b541ac2e998a523ae04da7673fd0932ded126 | /tests/bench/tree2.lean | 0b451fd5452037eb58d0a526563e0264f58643dd | [] | no_license | mattweingarten/lambdapure | 4aeff69e8e3b8e78ea3c0a2b9b61770ef5a689b1 | f920a4ad78e6b1e3651f30bf8445c9105dfa03a8 | refs/heads/master | 1,680,665,168,790 | 1,618,420,180,000 | 1,618,420,180,000 | 310,816,264 | 2 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 414 | lean |
inductive Tree
| Nil
| Node (l r : Tree) : Tree
open Tree
instance : Inhabited Tree := ⟨Nil⟩
-- This Function has an extra argument to suppress the
-- common sub-expression elimination optimization
partial def make' : UInt32 -> UInt32 -> Tree
| n, d =>
if d = 0 then Node Nil Nil
else Node (make' n (d - 1)) (make' (n + 1) (d - 1))
-- build a tree
def make (d : UInt32) := make' d d
|
8032b8aff589af6a5447d5cb0b7978ee6b3196d5 | 32025d5c2d6e33ad3b6dd8a3c91e1e838066a7f7 | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Exception.lean | dc010e7c80105298ecdcbf105f433fc6a9fc48bb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | walterhu1015/lean4 | b2c71b688975177402758924eaa513475ed6ce72 | 2214d81e84646a905d0b20b032c89caf89c737ad | refs/heads/master | 1,671,342,096,906 | 1,599,695,985,000 | 1,599,695,985,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,810 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.InternalExceptionId
import Lean.Meta.Exception
namespace Lean
namespace Elab
def registerPostponeId : IO InternalExceptionId :=
registerInternalExceptionId `postpone
@[init registerPostponeId]
constant postponeExceptionId : InternalExceptionId := arbitrary _
def registerUnsupportedSyntaxId : IO InternalExceptionId :=
registerInternalExceptionId `unsupportedSyntax
@[init registerUnsupportedSyntaxId]
constant unsupportedSyntaxExceptionId : InternalExceptionId := arbitrary _
def registerAbortElabId : IO InternalExceptionId :=
registerInternalExceptionId `abortElab
@[init registerAbortElabId]
constant abortExceptionId : InternalExceptionId := arbitrary _
def throwPostpone {α m} [MonadExceptOf Exception m] : m α :=
throw $ Exception.internal postponeExceptionId
def throwUnsupportedSyntax {α m} [MonadExceptOf Exception m] : m α :=
throw $ Exception.internal unsupportedSyntaxExceptionId
def throwIllFormedSyntax {α m} [Monad m] [MonadError m] : m α :=
throwError "ill-formed syntax"
def throwAlreadyDeclaredUniverseLevel {α m} [Monad m] [MonadError m] (u : Name) : m α :=
throwError ("a universe level named '" ++ toString u ++ "' has already been declared")
-- Throw exception to abort elaboration without producing any error message
def throwAbort {α m} [MonadExcept Exception m] : m α :=
throw $ Exception.internal abortExceptionId
def mkMessageCore (fileName : String) (fileMap : FileMap) (msgData : MessageData) (severity : MessageSeverity) (pos : String.Pos) : Message :=
let pos := fileMap.toPosition pos;
{ fileName := fileName, pos := pos, data := msgData, severity := severity }
end Elab
end Lean
|
d492a9e2290ca99c0e030a5cf7ed596f31979df5 | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/algebra/category/Module/adjunctions.lean | ebadde6cf2f5da0caa568050ddd6001b078c7775 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,195 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Johan Commelin
-/
import algebra.category.Module.monoidal
import category_theory.monoidal.functorial
import category_theory.monoidal.types
import linear_algebra.direct_sum.finsupp
/-!
The functor of forming finitely supported functions on a type with values in a `[ring R]`
is the left adjoint of
the forgetful functor from `R`-modules to types.
-/
noncomputable theory
universe u
open category_theory
namespace Module
open_locale classical
variables (R : Type u)
section
variables [ring R]
/--
The free functor `Type u ⥤ Module R` sending a type `X` to the
free `R`-module with generators `x : X`, implemented as the type `X →₀ R`.
-/
@[simps]
def free : Type u ⥤ Module R :=
{ obj := λ X, Module.of R (X →₀ R),
map := λ X Y f, finsupp.lmap_domain _ _ f,
map_id' := by { intros, exact finsupp.lmap_domain_id _ _ },
map_comp' := by { intros, exact finsupp.lmap_domain_comp _ _ _ _, } }
/--
The free-forgetful adjunction for R-modules.
-/
def adj : free R ⊣ forget (Module.{u} R) :=
adjunction.mk_of_hom_equiv
{ hom_equiv := λ X M, (finsupp.lift M R X).to_equiv.symm,
hom_equiv_naturality_left_symm' := λ _ _ M f g,
finsupp.lhom_ext' (λ x, linear_map.ext_ring
(finsupp.sum_map_domain_index_add_monoid_hom (λ y, ((smul_add_hom R ↥M).flip) (g y))).symm) }
end
namespace free
variables [comm_ring R]
/-- The free R-module functor is lax monoidal. -/
-- In fact, it's strong monoidal, but we don't yet have a typeclass for that.
instance : lax_monoidal.{u} (free R).obj :=
{ -- Send `R` to `punit →₀ R`
ε := finsupp.lsingle punit.star,
-- Send `(α →₀ R) ⊗ (β →₀ R)` to `α × β →₀ R`
μ := λ α β, (finsupp_tensor_finsupp' R α β).to_linear_map,
μ_natural' := begin
intros,
ext x x' ⟨y, y'⟩,
-- This is rather tedious: it's a terminal simp, with no arguments,
-- but between the four of them it is too slow.
simp only [tensor_product.mk_apply, mul_one, tensor_apply, monoidal_category.hom_apply,
Module.free_map, Module.coe_comp, map_functorial_obj,
linear_map.compr₂_apply, linear_equiv.coe_to_linear_map, linear_map.comp_apply,
function.comp_app,
finsupp.lmap_domain_apply, finsupp.map_domain_single,
finsupp_tensor_finsupp'_single_tmul_single, finsupp.lsingle_apply],
end,
left_unitality' := begin
intros,
ext,
simp only [tensor_product.mk_apply, mul_one,
Module.id_apply, Module.free_map, Module.coe_comp, map_functorial_obj,
Module.monoidal_category.hom_apply, left_unitor_hom_apply,
Module.monoidal_category.left_unitor_hom_apply,
linear_map.compr₂_apply, linear_equiv.coe_to_linear_map, linear_map.comp_apply,
function.comp_app,
finsupp.lmap_domain_apply, finsupp.smul_single', finsupp.map_domain_single,
finsupp_tensor_finsupp'_single_tmul_single, finsupp.lsingle_apply],
end,
right_unitality' := begin
intros,
ext,
simp only [tensor_product.mk_apply, mul_one,
Module.id_apply, Module.free_map, Module.coe_comp, map_functorial_obj,
Module.monoidal_category.hom_apply, right_unitor_hom_apply,
Module.monoidal_category.right_unitor_hom_apply,
linear_map.compr₂_apply, linear_equiv.coe_to_linear_map, linear_map.comp_apply,
function.comp_app,
finsupp.lmap_domain_apply, finsupp.smul_single', finsupp.map_domain_single,
finsupp_tensor_finsupp'_single_tmul_single, finsupp.lsingle_apply],
end,
associativity' := begin
intros,
ext,
simp only [tensor_product.mk_apply, mul_one,
Module.id_apply, Module.free_map, Module.coe_comp, map_functorial_obj,
Module.monoidal_category.hom_apply, associator_hom_apply,
Module.monoidal_category.associator_hom_apply,
linear_map.compr₂_apply, linear_equiv.coe_to_linear_map, linear_map.comp_apply,
function.comp_app,
finsupp.lmap_domain_apply, finsupp.smul_single', finsupp.map_domain_single,
finsupp_tensor_finsupp'_single_tmul_single, finsupp.lsingle_apply],
end, }
end free
end Module
|
e406c26610ae2919f6cc19a0969b3630240335d5 | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /tests/lean/run/using_bug.lean | 71e882b7425449cbdfe894fd16b6eebaef3d1ab3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 283 | lean | example (p q r : Prop) : p ∧ q ∧ r → q ∧ p :=
assume Hpqr : p ∧ q ∧ r,
have Hp : p, from and.elim_left Hpqr,
have Hqr : q ∧ r, from and.elim_right Hpqr,
have Hq : q, from and.elim_left Hqr,
show q ∧ p, using Hp Hq, from
proof
and.intro Hq Hp
qed
|
80ec2b3a88753f23e1a050b875911f07d02c5c4c | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/geometry/manifold/vector_bundle/pullback.lean | a68fa9c52a52a8acbf0faec1e49bddd452d80001 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,309 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2023 Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import geometry.manifold.cont_mdiff_map
import geometry.manifold.vector_bundle.basic
/-! # Pullbacks of smooth vector bundles
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines pullbacks of smooth vector bundles over a smooth manifold.
## Main definitions
* `smooth_vector_bundle.pullback`: For a smooth vector bundle `E` over a manifold `B` and a smooth
map `f : B' → B`, the pullback vector bundle `f *ᵖ E` is a smooth vector bundle.
-/
open bundle set
open_locale manifold
variables {𝕜 B B' M : Type*} (F : Type*) (E : B → Type*)
variables [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕜] [∀ x, add_comm_monoid (E x)] [∀ x, module 𝕜 (E x)]
[normed_add_comm_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
[topological_space (total_space F E)] [∀ x, topological_space (E x)]
{EB : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group EB] [normed_space 𝕜 EB]
{HB : Type*} [topological_space HB] (IB : model_with_corners 𝕜 EB HB)
[topological_space B] [charted_space HB B] [smooth_manifold_with_corners IB B]
{EB' : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group EB'] [normed_space 𝕜 EB']
{HB' : Type*} [topological_space HB'] (IB' : model_with_corners 𝕜 EB' HB')
[topological_space B'] [charted_space HB' B'] [smooth_manifold_with_corners IB' B']
[fiber_bundle F E] [vector_bundle 𝕜 F E] [smooth_vector_bundle F E IB]
(f : smooth_map IB' IB B' B)
/-- For a smooth vector bundle `E` over a manifold `B` and a smooth map `f : B' → B`, the pullback
vector bundle `f *ᵖ E` is a smooth vector bundle. -/
instance smooth_vector_bundle.pullback : smooth_vector_bundle F (f *ᵖ E) IB' :=
{ smooth_on_coord_change := begin
rintro _ _ ⟨e, he, rfl⟩ ⟨e', he', rfl⟩, resetI,
refine ((smooth_on_coord_change e e').comp f.smooth.smooth_on
(λ b hb, hb)).congr _,
rintro b (hb : f b ∈ e.base_set ∩ e'.base_set), ext v,
show ((e.pullback f).coord_changeL 𝕜 (e'.pullback f) b) v = (e.coord_changeL 𝕜 e' (f b)) v,
rw [e.coord_changeL_apply e' hb, (e.pullback f).coord_changeL_apply' _],
exacts [rfl, hb]
end }
|
77187fcf4ffc04ad1de4f989f54efb8eefce0e85 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /stage0/src/Lean/Util/CollectMVars.lean | 250ef65112286a518ead74d07e28d1df7b8836a2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,212 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Expr
namespace Lean
namespace CollectMVars
structure State where
visitedExpr : ExprSet := {}
result : Array MVarId := #[]
instance : Inhabited State := ⟨{}⟩
abbrev Visitor := State → State
@[inline] def visit (f : Expr → Visitor) (e : Expr) : Visitor := fun s =>
if !e.hasMVar || s.visitedExpr.contains e then s
else f e { s with visitedExpr := s.visitedExpr.insert e }
partial def main : Expr → Visitor
| Expr.proj _ _ e _ => visit main e
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ => visit main b ∘ visit main d
| Expr.lam _ d b _ => visit main b ∘ visit main d
| Expr.letE _ t v b _ => visit main b ∘ visit main v ∘ visit main t
| Expr.app f a _ => visit main a ∘ visit main f
| Expr.mdata _ b _ => visit main b
| Expr.mvar mvarId _ => fun s => { s with result := s.result.push mvarId }
| _ => id
end CollectMVars
def Expr.collectMVars (s : CollectMVars.State) (e : Expr) : CollectMVars.State :=
CollectMVars.visit CollectMVars.main e s
end Lean
|
7bce17d4cf5aa75f9f606058937df12174b23956 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/control/equiv_functor_auto.lean | d299dd5aff9bed7fc6b8be1af7b916980df7fc2a | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,069 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.category_theory.category.default
import Mathlib.data.equiv.functor
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u₀ u₁ l
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Functions functorial with respect to equivalences
An `equiv_functor` is a function from `Type → Type` equipped with the additional data of
coherently mapping equivalences to equivalences.
In categorical language, it is an endofunctor of the "core" of the category `Type`.
-/
/--
An `equiv_functor` is only functorial with respect to equivalences.
To construct an `equiv_functor`, it suffices to supply just the function `f α → f β` from
an equivalence `α ≃ β`, and then prove the functor laws. It's then a consequence that
this function is part of an equivalence, provided by `equiv_functor.map_equiv`.
-/
class equiv_functor (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) where
map : {α β : Type u₀} → α ≃ β → f α → f β
map_refl' :
autoParam (∀ (α : Type u₀), map (equiv.refl α) = id)
(Lean.Syntax.ident Lean.SourceInfo.none (String.toSubstring "Mathlib.obviously")
(Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous "Mathlib") "obviously") [])
map_trans' :
autoParam (∀ {α β γ : Type u₀} (k : α ≃ β) (h : β ≃ γ), map (equiv.trans k h) = map h ∘ map k)
(Lean.Syntax.ident Lean.SourceInfo.none (String.toSubstring "Mathlib.obviously")
(Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous "Mathlib") "obviously") [])
@[simp] theorem equiv_functor.map_refl {f : Type u₀ → Type u₁} [c : equiv_functor f] (α : Type u₀) :
equiv_functor.map (equiv.refl α) = id :=
sorry
theorem equiv_functor.map_trans {f : Type u₀ → Type u₁} [c : equiv_functor f] {α : Type u₀}
{β : Type u₀} {γ : Type u₀} (k : α ≃ β) (h : β ≃ γ) :
equiv_functor.map (equiv.trans k h) = equiv_functor.map h ∘ equiv_functor.map k :=
sorry
namespace equiv_functor
/-- An `equiv_functor` in fact takes every equiv to an equiv. -/
def map_equiv (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [equiv_functor f] {α : Type u₀} {β : Type u₀} (e : α ≃ β) :
f α ≃ f β :=
equiv.mk (map e) (map (equiv.symm e)) sorry sorry
@[simp] theorem map_equiv_apply (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [equiv_functor f] {α : Type u₀}
{β : Type u₀} (e : α ≃ β) (x : f α) : coe_fn (map_equiv f e) x = map e x :=
rfl
theorem map_equiv_symm_apply (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [equiv_functor f] {α : Type u₀} {β : Type u₀}
(e : α ≃ β) (y : f β) : coe_fn (equiv.symm (map_equiv f e)) y = map (equiv.symm e) y :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map_equiv_refl (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [equiv_functor f] (α : Type u₀) :
map_equiv f (equiv.refl α) = equiv.refl (f α) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem map_equiv_symm (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [equiv_functor f] {α : Type u₀} {β : Type u₀}
(e : α ≃ β) : equiv.symm (map_equiv f e) = map_equiv f (equiv.symm e) :=
equiv.ext (map_equiv_symm_apply f e)
/--
The composition of `map_equiv`s is carried over the `equiv_functor`.
For plain `functor`s, this lemma is named `map_map` when applied
or `map_comp_map` when not applied.
-/
@[simp] theorem map_equiv_trans (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [equiv_functor f] {α : Type u₀}
{β : Type u₀} {γ : Type u₀} (ab : α ≃ β) (bc : β ≃ γ) :
equiv.trans (map_equiv f ab) (map_equiv f bc) = map_equiv f (equiv.trans ab bc) :=
sorry
protected instance of_is_lawful_functor (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [Functor f] [is_lawful_functor f] :
equiv_functor f :=
mk fun (α β : Type u₀) (e : α ≃ β) => Functor.map ⇑e
theorem map_equiv.injective (f : Type u₀ → Type u₁) [Applicative f] [is_lawful_applicative f]
{α : Type u₀} {β : Type u₀} (h : Type u₀ → function.injective pure) :
function.injective (map_equiv f) :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
69b6e76ef38fa4e499efaae1aeb050a33ae0a870 | 95dcf8dea2baf2b4b0a60d438f27c35ae3dd3990 | /src/data/list/perm.lean | cf5bb32182d6469acb9ab9617ae9dba82dd38414 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | uniformity1/mathlib | 829341bad9dfa6d6be9adaacb8086a8a492e85a4 | dd0e9bd8f2e5ec267f68e72336f6973311909105 | refs/heads/master | 1,588,592,015,670 | 1,554,219,842,000 | 1,554,219,842,000 | 179,110,702 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,554,220,076,000 | 1,554,220,076,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 40,972 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
List permutations.
-/
import data.list.basic
namespace list
universe variables uu vv
variables {α : Type uu} {β : Type vv}
/-- `perm l₁ l₂` or `l₁ ~ l₂` asserts that `l₁` and `l₂` are permutations
of each other. This is defined by induction using pairwise swaps. -/
inductive perm : list α → list α → Prop
| nil : perm [] []
| skip : Π (x : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α}, perm l₁ l₂ → perm (x::l₁) (x::l₂)
| swap : Π (x y : α) (l : list α), perm (y::x::l) (x::y::l)
| trans : Π {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, perm l₁ l₂ → perm l₂ l₃ → perm l₁ l₃
open perm
infix ~ := perm
@[refl] protected theorem perm.refl : ∀ (l : list α), l ~ l
| [] := perm.nil
| (x::xs) := skip x (perm.refl xs)
@[symm] protected theorem perm.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₂ ~ l₁ :=
perm.rec_on p
perm.nil
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, skip x r₁)
(λ x y l, swap y x l)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₂ r₁)
theorem perm.swap'
(x y : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : y::x::l₁ ~ x::y::l₂ :=
trans (swap _ _ _) (skip _ $ skip _ p)
attribute [trans] perm.trans
theorem perm.eqv (α : Type) : equivalence (@perm α) :=
mk_equivalence (@perm α) (@perm.refl α) (@perm.symm α) (@perm.trans α)
instance is_setoid (α : Type) : setoid (list α) :=
setoid.mk (@perm α) (perm.eqv α)
theorem perm_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, perm.rec_on p
(λ h, h)
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁ i, or.elim i
(λ ax, by simp [ax])
(λ al₁, or.inr (r₁ al₁)))
(λ x y l ayxl, or.elim ayxl
(λ ay, by simp [ay])
(λ axl, or.elim axl
(λ ax, by simp [ax])
(λ al, or.inr (or.inr al))))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ ainl₁, r₂ (r₁ ainl₁))
theorem mem_of_perm {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂ :=
iff.intro (λ m, perm_subset h m) (λ m, perm_subset h.symm m)
theorem perm_app_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t₁ : list α) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁++t₁ ~ l₂++t₁ :=
perm.rec_on p
(perm.refl ([] ++ t₁))
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, skip x r₁)
(λ x y l, swap x y _)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, trans r₁ r₂)
theorem perm_app_right {t₁ t₂ : list α} : ∀ (l : list α), t₁ ~ t₂ → l++t₁ ~ l++t₂
| [] p := p
| (x::xs) p := skip x (perm_app_right xs p)
theorem perm_app {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : l₁++t₁ ~ l₂++t₂ :=
trans (perm_app_left t₁ p₁) (perm_app_right l₂ p₂)
theorem perm_app_cons (a : α) {h₁ h₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}
(p₁ : h₁ ~ h₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : h₁ ++ a::t₁ ~ h₂ ++ a::t₂ :=
perm_app p₁ (skip a p₂)
@[simp] theorem perm_middle {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁++a::l₂ ~ a::(l₁++l₂)
| [] l₂ := perm.refl _
| (b::l₁) l₂ := (skip b (@perm_middle l₁ l₂)).trans (swap a b _)
@[simp] theorem perm_cons_app (a : α) (l : list α) : l ++ [a] ~ a::l :=
by simpa using @perm_middle _ a l []
@[simp] theorem perm_app_comm : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (l₁++l₂) ~ (l₂++l₁)
| [] l₂ := by simp
| (a::t) l₂ := (skip a perm_app_comm).trans perm_middle.symm
theorem concat_perm (l : list α) (a : α) : concat l a ~ a :: l :=
by simp
theorem perm_length {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ :=
perm.rec_on p
rfl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r, by simp[r])
(λ x y l, by simp)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, eq.trans r₁ r₂)
theorem eq_nil_of_perm_nil {l₁ : list α} (p : [] ~ l₁) : l₁ = [] :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (perm_length p).symm
theorem perm_nil {l₁ : list α} : l₁ ~ [] ↔ l₁ = [] :=
⟨λ p, eq_nil_of_perm_nil p.symm, λ e, e ▸ perm.refl _⟩
theorem not_perm_nil_cons (x : α) (l : list α) : ¬ [] ~ x::l
| p := by injection eq_nil_of_perm_nil p
theorem eq_singleton_of_perm {a b : α} (p : [a] ~ [b]) : a = b :=
by simpa using perm_subset p (by simp)
theorem eq_singleton_of_perm_inv {a : α} {l : list α} (p : [a] ~ l) : l = [a] :=
match l, show 1 = _, from perm_length p, p with
| [a'], rfl, p := by rw [eq_singleton_of_perm p]
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_perm : ∀ (l : list α), reverse l ~ l
| [] := perm.nil
| (a::l) := by rw reverse_cons; exact
(perm_cons_app _ _).trans (skip a $ reverse_perm l)
theorem perm_cons_app_cons {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (p : l ~ l₁++l₂) : a::l ~ l₁++(a::l₂) :=
trans (skip a p) perm_middle.symm
@[simp] theorem perm_repeat {a : α} {n : ℕ} {l : list α} : repeat a n ~ l ↔ repeat a n = l :=
⟨λ p, (eq_repeat.2 $ by exact
⟨by simpa using (perm_length p).symm,
λ b m, eq_of_mem_repeat $ perm_subset p.symm m⟩).symm,
λ h, h ▸ perm.refl _⟩
theorem perm_erase [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ~ a :: l.erase a :=
let ⟨l₁, l₂, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_erase_eq h in
e₂.symm ▸ e₁.symm ▸ perm_middle
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem perm_induction_on
{P : list α → list α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂)
(h₁ : P [] [])
(h₂ : ∀ x l₁ l₂, l₁ ~ l₂ → P l₁ l₂ → P (x::l₁) (x::l₂))
(h₃ : ∀ x y l₁ l₂, l₁ ~ l₂ → P l₁ l₂ → P (y::x::l₁) (x::y::l₂))
(h₄ : ∀ l₁ l₂ l₃, l₁ ~ l₂ → l₂ ~ l₃ → P l₁ l₂ → P l₂ l₃ → P l₁ l₃) :
P l₁ l₂ :=
have P_refl : ∀ l, P l l, from
assume l,
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ x xs ih, h₂ x xs xs (perm.refl xs) ih),
perm.rec_on p h₁ h₂ (λ x y l, h₃ x y l l (perm.refl l) (P_refl l)) h₄
@[congr] theorem perm_filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
filter_map f l₁ ~ filter_map f l₂ :=
begin
induction p with x l₂ l₂' p IH x y l₂ l₂ m₂ r₂ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂,
{ simp },
{ simp [filter_map], cases f x with a; simp [filter_map, IH, skip] },
{ simp [filter_map], cases f x with a; cases f y with b; simp [filter_map, swap] },
{ exact IH₁.trans IH₂ }
end
@[congr] theorem perm_map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
map f l₁ ~ map f l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_map; apply perm_filter_map _ p
theorem perm_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) {H₁ H₂} : pmap f l₁ H₁ ~ pmap f l₂ H₂ :=
begin
induction p with x l₂ l₂' p IH x y l₂ l₂ m₂ r₂ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂,
{ simp },
{ simp [IH, skip] },
{ simp [swap] },
{ refine IH₁.trans IH₂,
exact λ a m, H₂ a (perm_subset p₂ m) }
end
theorem perm_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ ~ l₂) : filter p l₁ ~ filter p l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_filter; apply perm_filter_map _ s
theorem exists_perm_sublist {l₁ l₂ l₂' : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) (p : l₂ ~ l₂') : ∃ l₁' ~ l₁, l₁' <+ l₂' :=
begin
induction p with x l₂ l₂' p IH x y l₂ l₂ m₂ r₂ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂ generalizing l₁ s,
{ exact ⟨[], eq_nil_of_sublist_nil s ▸ perm.refl _, nil_sublist _⟩ },
{ cases s with _ _ _ s l₁ _ _ s,
{ exact let ⟨l₁', p', s'⟩ := IH s in ⟨l₁', p', s'.cons _ _ _⟩ },
{ exact let ⟨l₁', p', s'⟩ := IH s in ⟨x::l₁', skip x p', s'.cons2 _ _ _⟩ } },
{ cases s with _ _ _ s l₁ _ _ s; cases s with _ _ _ s l₁ _ _ s,
{ exact ⟨l₁, perm.refl _, (s.cons _ _ _).cons _ _ _⟩ },
{ exact ⟨x::l₁, perm.refl _, (s.cons _ _ _).cons2 _ _ _⟩ },
{ exact ⟨y::l₁, perm.refl _, (s.cons2 _ _ _).cons _ _ _⟩ },
{ exact ⟨x::y::l₁, perm.swap _ _ _, (s.cons2 _ _ _).cons2 _ _ _⟩ } },
{ exact let ⟨m₁, pm, sm⟩ := IH₁ s, ⟨r₁, pr, sr⟩ := IH₂ sm in
⟨r₁, pr.trans pm, sr⟩ }
end
section rel
open relator
variables {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop}
local infixr ` ∘r ` : 80 := relation.comp
lemma perm_comp_perm : (perm ∘r perm : list α → list α → Prop) = perm :=
begin
funext a c, apply propext,
split,
{ exact assume ⟨b, hab, hba⟩, perm.trans hab hba },
{ exact assume h, ⟨a, perm.refl a, h⟩ }
end
lemma perm_comp_forall₂ {l u v} (hlu : perm l u) (huv : forall₂ r u v) : (forall₂ r ∘r perm) l v :=
begin
induction hlu generalizing v,
case perm.nil { cases huv, exact ⟨[], forall₂.nil, perm.nil⟩ },
case perm.skip : a l u hlu ih {
cases huv with _ b _ v hab huv',
rcases ih huv' with ⟨l₂, h₁₂, h₂₃⟩,
exact ⟨b::l₂, forall₂.cons hab h₁₂, perm.skip _ h₂₃⟩
},
case perm.swap : a₁ a₂ l₁ l₂ h₂₃ {
cases h₂₃ with _ b₁ _ l₂ h₁ hr_₂₃,
cases hr_₂₃ with _ b₂ _ l₂ h₂ h₁₂,
exact ⟨b₂::b₁::l₂, forall₂.cons h₂ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₁₂), perm.swap _ _ _⟩
},
case perm.trans : la₁ la₂ la₃ _ _ ih₁ ih₂ {
rcases ih₂ huv with ⟨lb₂, hab₂, h₂₃⟩,
rcases ih₁ hab₂ with ⟨lb₁, hab₁, h₁₂⟩,
exact ⟨lb₁, hab₁, perm.trans h₁₂ h₂₃⟩
}
end
lemma forall₂_comp_perm_eq_perm_comp_forall₂ : forall₂ r ∘r perm = perm ∘r forall₂ r :=
begin
funext l₁ l₃, apply propext,
split,
{ assume h, rcases h with ⟨l₂, h₁₂, h₂₃⟩,
have : forall₂ (flip r) l₂ l₁, from h₁₂.flip ,
rcases perm_comp_forall₂ h₂₃.symm this with ⟨l', h₁, h₂⟩,
exact ⟨l', h₂.symm, h₁.flip⟩ },
{ exact assume ⟨l₂, h₁₂, h₂₃⟩, perm_comp_forall₂ h₁₂ h₂₃ }
end
lemma rel_perm_imp (hr : right_unique r) : (forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ implies) perm perm :=
assume a b h₁ c d h₂ h,
have (flip (forall₂ r) ∘r (perm ∘r forall₂ r)) b d, from ⟨a, h₁, c, h, h₂⟩,
have ((flip (forall₂ r) ∘r forall₂ r) ∘r perm) b d,
by rwa [← forall₂_comp_perm_eq_perm_comp_forall₂, ← relation.comp_assoc] at this,
let ⟨b', ⟨c', hbc, hcb⟩, hbd⟩ := this in
have b' = b, from right_unique_forall₂ @hr hcb hbc,
this ▸ hbd
lemma rel_perm (hr : bi_unique r) : (forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ (↔)) perm perm :=
assume a b hab c d hcd, iff.intro
(rel_perm_imp hr.2 hab hcd)
(rel_perm_imp (assume a b c, left_unique_flip hr.1) hab.flip hcd.flip)
end rel
section subperm
/-- `subperm l₁ l₂`, denoted `l₁ <+~ l₂`, means that `l₁` is a sublist of
a permutation of `l₂`. This is an analogue of `l₁ ⊆ l₂` which respects
multiplicities of elements, and is used for the `≤` relation on multisets. -/
def subperm (l₁ l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ l ~ l₁, l <+ l₂
infix ` <+~ `:50 := subperm
theorem perm.subperm_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l <+~ l₁ ↔ l <+~ l₂ :=
suffices ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ ~ l₂ → l <+~ l₁ → l <+~ l₂,
from ⟨this p, this p.symm⟩,
λ l₁ l₂ p ⟨u, pu, su⟩,
let ⟨v, pv, sv⟩ := exists_perm_sublist su p in
⟨v, pv.trans pu, sv⟩
theorem perm.subperm_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l ↔ l₂ <+~ l :=
⟨λ ⟨u, pu, su⟩, ⟨u, pu.trans p, su⟩,
λ ⟨u, pu, su⟩, ⟨u, pu.trans p.symm, su⟩⟩
theorem subperm_of_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
⟨l₁, perm.refl _, s⟩
theorem subperm_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
⟨l₂, p.symm, sublist.refl _⟩
theorem subperm.refl (l : list α) : l <+~ l := subperm_of_perm (perm.refl _)
theorem subperm.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → l₂ <+~ l₃ → l₁ <+~ l₃
| s ⟨l₂', p₂, s₂⟩ :=
let ⟨l₁', p₁, s₁⟩ := p₂.subperm_left.2 s in ⟨l₁', p₁, s₁.trans s₂⟩
theorem length_le_of_subperm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| ⟨l, p, s⟩ := perm_length p ▸ length_le_of_sublist s
theorem subperm.perm_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → length l₂ ≤ length l₁ → l₁ ~ l₂
| ⟨l, p, s⟩ h :=
suffices l = l₂, from this ▸ p.symm,
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s $ perm_length p.symm ▸ h
theorem subperm.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+~ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+~ l₁) : l₁ ~ l₂ :=
h₁.perm_of_length_le (length_le_of_subperm h₂)
theorem subset_of_subperm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ⟨l, p, s⟩ := subset.trans (perm_subset p.symm) (subset_of_sublist s)
end subperm
theorem exists_perm_append_of_sublist : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → ∃ l, l₂ ~ l₁ ++ l
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil := ⟨nil, perm.refl _⟩
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) :=
let ⟨l, p⟩ := exists_perm_append_of_sublist s in
⟨a::l, (skip a p).trans perm_middle.symm⟩
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) :=
let ⟨l, p⟩ := exists_perm_append_of_sublist s in
⟨l, skip a p⟩
theorem perm_countp (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ ~ l₂) : countp p l₁ = countp p l₂ :=
by rw [countp_eq_length_filter, countp_eq_length_filter];
exact perm_length (perm_filter _ s)
theorem countp_le_of_subperm (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
{l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂
| ⟨l, p', s⟩ := perm_countp p p' ▸ countp_le_of_sublist s
theorem perm_count [decidable_eq α] {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) (a) : count a l₁ = count a l₂ :=
perm_countp _ p
theorem count_le_of_subperm [decidable_eq α] {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+~ l₂) (a) : count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_subperm _ s
theorem foldl_eq_of_perm {f : β → α → β} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (rcomm : right_commutative f) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
∀ b, foldl f b l₁ = foldl f b l₂ :=
perm_induction_on p
(λ b, rfl)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r b, r (f b x))
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p r b, by simp; rw rcomm; exact r (f (f b x) y))
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ b, eq.trans (r₁ b) (r₂ b))
theorem foldr_eq_of_perm {f : α → β → β} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (lcomm : left_commutative f) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
∀ b, foldr f b l₁ = foldr f b l₂ :=
perm_induction_on p
(λ b, rfl)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r b, by simp; rw [r b])
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p r b, by simp; rw [lcomm, r b])
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ a, eq.trans (r₁ a) (r₂ a))
lemma rec_heq_of_perm {β : list α → Sort*} {f : Πa l, β l → β (a::l)} {b : β []} {l l' : list α}
(hl : perm l l')
(f_congr : ∀{a l l' b b'}, perm l l' → b == b' → f a l b == f a l' b')
(f_swap : ∀{a a' l b}, f a (a'::l) (f a' l b) == f a' (a::l) (f a l b)) :
@list.rec α β b f l == @list.rec α β b f l' :=
begin
induction hl,
case list.perm.nil { refl },
case list.perm.skip : a l l' h ih { exact f_congr h ih },
case list.perm.swap : a a' l { exact f_swap },
case list.perm.trans : l₁ l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ ih₁ ih₂ { exact heq.trans ih₁ ih₂ }
end
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [is_associative α op] [is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
lemma fold_op_eq_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ <*> a = l₂ <*> a :=
foldl_eq_of_perm (right_comm _ (is_commutative.comm _) (is_associative.assoc _)) h _
end
section comm_monoid
open list
variable [comm_monoid α]
@[to_additive list.sum_eq_of_perm]
lemma prod_eq_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : perm l₁ l₂) : prod l₁ = prod l₂ :=
by induction h; simp [*, mul_left_comm]
@[to_additive list.sum_reverse]
lemma prod_reverse (l : list α) : prod l.reverse = prod l :=
prod_eq_of_perm $ reverse_perm l
end comm_monoid
theorem perm_inv_core {a : α} {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α} : l₁++a::r₁ ~ l₂++a::r₂ → l₁++r₁ ~ l₂++r₂ :=
begin
generalize e₁ : l₁++a::r₁ = s₁, generalize e₂ : l₂++a::r₂ = s₂,
intro p, revert l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ e₁ e₂,
refine perm_induction_on p _ (λ x t₁ t₂ p IH, _) (λ x y t₁ t₂ p IH, _) (λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, _);
intros l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ e₁ e₂,
{ apply (not_mem_nil a).elim, rw ← e₁, simp },
{ cases l₁ with y l₁; cases l₂ with z l₂;
dsimp at e₁ e₂; injections; subst x,
{ substs t₁ t₂, exact p },
{ substs z t₁ t₂, exact p.trans perm_middle },
{ substs y t₁ t₂, exact perm_middle.symm.trans p },
{ substs z t₁ t₂, exact skip y (IH rfl rfl) } },
{ rcases l₁ with _|⟨y, _|⟨z, l₁⟩⟩; rcases l₂ with _|⟨u, _|⟨v, l₂⟩⟩;
dsimp at e₁ e₂; injections; substs x y,
{ substs r₁ r₂, exact skip a p },
{ substs r₁ r₂, exact skip u p },
{ substs r₁ v t₂, exact skip u (p.trans perm_middle) },
{ substs r₁ r₂, exact skip y p },
{ substs r₁ r₂ y u, exact skip a p },
{ substs r₁ u v t₂, exact (skip y $ p.trans perm_middle).trans (swap _ _ _) },
{ substs r₂ z t₁, exact skip y (perm_middle.symm.trans p) },
{ substs r₂ y z t₁, exact (swap _ _ _).trans (skip u $ perm_middle.symm.trans p) },
{ substs u v t₁ t₂, exact (IH rfl rfl).swap' _ _ } },
{ substs t₁ t₃,
have : a ∈ t₂ := perm_subset p₁ (by simp),
rcases mem_split this with ⟨l₂, r₂, e₂⟩,
subst t₂, exact (IH₁ rfl rfl).trans (IH₂ rfl rfl) }
end
theorem perm_cons_inv {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ ~ a::l₂ → l₁ ~ l₂ :=
@perm_inv_core _ _ [] [] _ _
theorem perm_cons (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ ~ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
⟨perm_cons_inv, skip a⟩
theorem perm_app_left_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ ~ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := (perm_cons a).trans (perm_app_left_iff l)
theorem perm_app_right_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l ~ l₂++l ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
⟨λ p, (perm_app_left_iff _).1 $ trans perm_app_comm $ trans p perm_app_comm,
perm_app_left _⟩
theorem perm_option_to_list {o₁ o₂ : option α} : o₁.to_list ~ o₂.to_list ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ p, _, λ e, e ▸ perm.refl _⟩,
cases o₁ with a; cases o₂ with b, {refl},
{ cases (perm_length p) },
{ cases (perm_length p) },
{ exact option.mem_to_list.1 ((mem_of_perm p).2 $ by simp) }
end
theorem subperm_cons (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+~ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨l, p, s⟩, begin
cases s with _ _ _ s' u _ _ s',
{ exact (p.subperm_left.2 $ subperm_of_sublist $ sublist_cons _ _).trans
(subperm_of_sublist s') },
{ exact ⟨u, perm_cons_inv p, s'⟩ }
end, λ ⟨l, p, s⟩, ⟨a::l, skip a p, s.cons2 _ _ _⟩⟩
theorem cons_subperm_of_mem {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (h₁ : a ∉ l₁) (h₂ : a ∈ l₂)
(s : l₁ <+~ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨l, p, s⟩,
induction s generalizing l₁,
case list.sublist.slnil { cases h₂ },
case list.sublist.cons : r₁ r₂ b s' ih {
simp at h₂,
cases h₂ with e m,
{ subst b, exact ⟨a::r₁, skip a p, s'.cons2 _ _ _⟩ },
{ rcases ih m d₁ h₁ p with ⟨t, p', s'⟩, exact ⟨t, p', s'.cons _ _ _⟩ } },
case list.sublist.cons2 : r₁ r₂ b s' ih {
have bm : b ∈ l₁ := (perm_subset p $ mem_cons_self _ _),
have am : a ∈ r₂ := h₂.resolve_left (λ e, h₁ $ e.symm ▸ bm),
rcases mem_split bm with ⟨t₁, t₂, rfl⟩,
have st : t₁ ++ t₂ <+ t₁ ++ b :: t₂ := by simp,
rcases ih am (nodup_of_sublist st d₁)
(mt (λ x, subset_of_sublist st x) h₁)
(perm_cons_inv $ p.trans perm_middle) with ⟨t, p', s'⟩,
exact ⟨b::t, (skip b p').trans $ (swap _ _ _).trans (skip a perm_middle.symm), s'.cons2 _ _ _⟩ }
end
theorem subperm_app_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+~ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := (subperm_cons a).trans (subperm_app_left l)
theorem subperm_app_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+~ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
(perm_app_comm.subperm_left.trans perm_app_comm.subperm_right).trans (subperm_app_left l)
theorem subperm.exists_of_length_lt {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <+~ l₂ → length l₁ < length l₂ → ∃ a, a :: l₁ <+~ l₂
| ⟨l, p, s⟩ h :=
suffices length l < length l₂ → ∃ (a : α), a :: l <+~ l₂, from
(this $ perm_length p.symm ▸ h).imp (λ a, (skip a p).subperm_right.1),
begin
clear subperm.exists_of_length_lt p h l₁, rename l₂ u,
induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH _ _ b s IH; intro h,
{ cases h },
{ cases lt_or_eq_of_le (nat.le_of_lt_succ h : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) with h h,
{ exact (IH h).imp (λ a s, s.trans (subperm_of_sublist $ sublist_cons _ _)) },
{ exact ⟨a, eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h ▸ subperm.refl _⟩ } },
{ exact (IH $ nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h).imp
(λ a s, (swap _ _ _).subperm_right.1 $ (subperm_cons _).2 s) }
end
theorem subperm_of_subset_nodup
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : nodup l₁) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
begin
induction d with a l₁' h d IH,
{ exact ⟨nil, perm.nil, nil_sublist _⟩ },
{ cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
simp at h,
exact cons_subperm_of_mem d h H₁ (IH H₂) }
end
theorem perm_ext {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) : l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ ∀a, a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂ :=
⟨λ p a, mem_of_perm p, λ H, subperm.antisymm
(subperm_of_subset_nodup d₁ (λ a, (H a).1))
(subperm_of_subset_nodup d₂ (λ a, (H a).2))⟩
theorem perm_ext_sublist_nodup {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : nodup l)
(s₁ : l₁ <+ l) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l) : l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨λ h, begin
induction s₂ with l₂ l a s₂ IH l₂ l a s₂ IH generalizing l₁,
{ exact eq_nil_of_perm_nil h.symm },
{ simp at d,
cases s₁ with _ _ _ s₁ l₁ _ _ s₁,
{ exact IH d.2 s₁ h },
{ apply d.1.elim,
exact subset_of_subperm ⟨_, h.symm, s₂⟩ (mem_cons_self _ _) } },
{ simp at d,
cases s₁ with _ _ _ s₁ l₁ _ _ s₁,
{ apply d.1.elim,
exact subset_of_subperm ⟨_, h, s₁⟩ (mem_cons_self _ _) },
{ rw IH d.2 s₁ (perm_cons_inv h) } }
end, λ h, by rw h⟩
section
variable [decidable_eq α]
-- attribute [congr]
theorem erase_perm_erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.erase a ~ l₂.erase a :=
if h₁ : a ∈ l₁ then
have h₂ : a ∈ l₂, from perm_subset p h₁,
perm_cons_inv $ trans (perm_erase h₁).symm $ trans p (perm_erase h₂)
else
have h₂ : a ∉ l₂, from mt (mem_of_perm p).2 h₁,
by rw [erase_of_not_mem h₁, erase_of_not_mem h₂]; exact p
theorem erase_subperm (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+~ l :=
⟨l.erase a, perm.refl _, erase_sublist _ _⟩
theorem erase_subperm_erase {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (h : l₁ <+~ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+~ l₂.erase a :=
let ⟨l, hp, hs⟩ := h in ⟨l.erase a, erase_perm_erase _ hp, erase_sublist_erase _ hs⟩
theorem perm_diff_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t : list α) (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁.diff t ~ l₂.diff t :=
by induction t generalizing l₁ l₂ h; simp [*, erase_perm_erase]
theorem perm_diff_right (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : t₁ ~ t₂) : l.diff t₁ = l.diff t₂ :=
by induction h generalizing l; simp [*, erase_perm_erase, erase_comm]
<|> exact (ih_1 _).trans (ih_2 _)
theorem subperm_cons_diff {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (a :: l₁).diff l₂ <+~ a :: l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] := ⟨a::l₁, by simp⟩
| l₁ (b::l₂) :=
begin
repeat {rw diff_cons},
by_cases heq : a = b,
{ by_cases b ∈ l₁,
{ rw perm.subperm_right, apply subperm_cons_diff,
simp [perm_diff_left, heq, perm_erase h] },
{ simp [subperm_of_sublist, sublist.cons, h, heq] } },
{ simp [heq, subperm_cons_diff] }
end
theorem subset_cons_diff {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (a :: l₁).diff l₂ ⊆ a :: l₁.diff l₂ :=
subset_of_subperm subperm_cons_diff
theorem perm_bag_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t : list α) (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁.bag_inter t ~ l₂.bag_inter t :=
begin
induction h with x _ _ _ _ x y _ _ _ _ _ _ ih_1 ih_2 generalizing t, {simp},
{ by_cases x ∈ t; simp [*, skip] },
{ by_cases x = y, {simp [h]},
by_cases xt : x ∈ t; by_cases yt : y ∈ t,
{ simp [xt, yt, mem_erase_of_ne h, mem_erase_of_ne (ne.symm h), erase_comm, swap] },
{ simp [xt, yt, mt mem_of_mem_erase, skip] },
{ simp [xt, yt, mt mem_of_mem_erase, skip] },
{ simp [xt, yt] } },
{ exact (ih_1 _).trans (ih_2 _) }
end
theorem perm_bag_inter_right (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list α} (p : t₁ ~ t₂) : l.bag_inter t₁ = l.bag_inter t₂ :=
begin
induction l with a l IH generalizing t₁ t₂ p, {simp},
by_cases a ∈ t₁,
{ simp [h, (mem_of_perm p).1 h, IH (erase_perm_erase _ p)] },
{ simp [h, mt (mem_of_perm p).2 h, IH p] }
end
theorem cons_perm_iff_perm_erase {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₂ ∧ l₁ ~ l₂.erase a :=
⟨λ h, have a ∈ l₂, from perm_subset h (mem_cons_self a l₁),
⟨this, perm_cons_inv $ h.trans $ perm_erase this⟩,
λ ⟨m, h⟩, trans (skip a h) (perm_erase m).symm⟩
theorem perm_iff_count {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ ∀ a, count a l₁ = count a l₂ :=
⟨perm_count, λ H, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂,
{ cases l₂ with b l₂, {refl},
specialize H b, simp at H, contradiction },
{ have : a ∈ l₂ := count_pos.1 (by rw ← H; simp; apply nat.succ_pos),
refine trans (skip a $ IH $ λ b, _) (perm_erase this).symm,
specialize H b,
rw perm_count (perm_erase this) at H,
by_cases b = a; simp [h] at H ⊢; assumption }
end⟩
instance decidable_perm : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ ~ l₂)
| [] [] := is_true $ perm.refl _
| [] (b::l₂) := is_false $ λ h, by have := eq_nil_of_perm_nil h; contradiction
| (a::l₁) l₂ := by haveI := decidable_perm l₁ (l₂.erase a);
exact decidable_of_iff' _ cons_perm_iff_perm_erase
-- @[congr]
theorem perm_erase_dup_of_perm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
erase_dup l₁ ~ erase_dup l₂ :=
perm_iff_count.2 $ λ a,
if h : a ∈ l₁
then by simp [nodup_erase_dup, h, perm_subset p h]
else by simp [h, mt (mem_of_perm p).2 h]
-- attribute [congr]
theorem perm_insert (a : α)
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : insert a l₁ ~ insert a l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁
then by simpa [h, perm_subset p h] using p
else by simpa [h, mt (mem_of_perm p).2 h] using skip a p
theorem perm_insert_swap (x y : α) (l : list α) :
insert x (insert y l) ~ insert y (insert x l) :=
begin
by_cases xl : x ∈ l; by_cases yl : y ∈ l; simp [xl, yl],
by_cases xy : x = y, { simp [xy] },
simp [not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem xy xl,
not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (ne.symm xy) yl],
constructor
end
theorem perm_union_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t₁ : list α) (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ ∪ t₁ ~ l₂ ∪ t₁ :=
begin
induction h with a _ _ _ ih _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih_1 ih_2; try {simp},
{ exact perm_insert a ih },
{ apply perm_insert_swap },
{ exact ih_1.trans ih_2 }
end
theorem perm_union_right (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : t₁ ~ t₂) : l ∪ t₁ ~ l ∪ t₂ :=
by induction l; simp [*, perm_insert]
-- @[congr]
theorem perm_union {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : l₁ ∪ t₁ ~ l₂ ∪ t₂ :=
trans (perm_union_left t₁ p₁) (perm_union_right l₂ p₂)
theorem perm_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t₁ : list α) : l₁ ~ l₂ → l₁ ∩ t₁ ~ l₂ ∩ t₁ :=
perm_filter _
theorem perm_inter_right (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list α} (p : t₁ ~ t₂) : l ∩ t₁ = l ∩ t₂ :=
by dsimp [(∩), list.inter]; congr; funext a; rw [mem_of_perm p]
-- @[congr]
theorem perm_inter {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : l₁ ∩ t₁ ~ l₂ ∩ t₂ :=
perm_inter_right l₂ p₂ ▸ perm_inter_left t₁ p₁
end
theorem perm_pairwise {R : α → α → Prop} (S : symmetric R) :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂), pairwise R l₁ ↔ pairwise R l₂ :=
suffices ∀ {l₁ l₂}, l₁ ~ l₂ → pairwise R l₁ → pairwise R l₂, from λ l₁ l₂ p, ⟨this p, this p.symm⟩,
λ l₁ l₂ p d, begin
induction d with a l₁ h d IH generalizing l₂,
{ rw eq_nil_of_perm_nil p, constructor },
{ have : a ∈ l₂ := perm_subset p (mem_cons_self _ _),
rcases mem_split this with ⟨s₂, t₂, rfl⟩,
have p' := perm_cons_inv (p.trans perm_middle),
refine (pairwise_middle S).2 (pairwise_cons.2 ⟨λ b m, _, IH _ p'⟩),
exact h _ (perm_subset p'.symm m) }
end
theorem perm_nodup {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ~ l₂ → (nodup l₁ ↔ nodup l₂) :=
perm_pairwise $ @ne.symm α
theorem perm_bind_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → list β) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.bind f ~ l₂.bind f :=
begin
induction p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, {simp},
{ simp, exact perm_app_right _ IH },
{ simp, rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc], exact perm_app_left _ perm_app_comm },
{ exact trans IH₁ IH₂ }
end
theorem perm_bind_right (l : list α) {f g : α → list β} (h : ∀ a, f a ~ g a) :
l.bind f ~ l.bind g :=
by induction l with a l IH; simp; exact perm_app (h a) IH
theorem perm_product_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t₁ : list β) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : product l₁ t₁ ~ product l₂ t₁ :=
perm_bind_left _ p
theorem perm_product_right (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list β} (p : t₁ ~ t₂) : product l t₁ ~ product l t₂ :=
perm_bind_right _ $ λ a, perm_map _ p
@[congr] theorem perm_product {l₁ l₂ : list α} {t₁ t₂ : list β}
(p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : product l₁ t₁ ~ product l₂ t₂ :=
trans (perm_product_left t₁ p₁) (perm_product_right l₂ p₂)
theorem sublists_cons_perm_append (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists (a :: l) ~ sublists l ++ map (cons a) (sublists l) :=
begin
simp [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine skip _ ((skip _ _).trans perm_middle.symm),
induction sublists_aux l cons with b l IH; simp,
exact skip b ((skip _ IH).trans perm_middle.symm)
end
theorem sublists_perm_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, sublists l ~ sublists' l
| [] := perm.refl _
| (a::l) := let IH := sublists_perm_sublists' l in
by rw sublists'_cons; exact
(sublists_cons_perm_append _ _).trans (perm_app IH (perm_map _ IH))
theorem revzip_sublists (l : list α) :
∀ l₁ l₂, (l₁, l₂) ∈ revzip l.sublists → l₁ ++ l₂ ~ l :=
begin
rw revzip,
apply list.reverse_rec_on l,
{ intros l₁ l₂ h, simp at h, simp [h] },
{ intros l a IH l₁ l₂ h,
rw [sublists_concat, reverse_append, zip_append, ← map_reverse,
zip_map_right, zip_map_left] at h; [simp at h, simp],
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂', h, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁', l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩,
{ rw ← append_assoc,
exact perm_app_left _ (IH _ _ h) },
{ rw append_assoc,
apply (perm_app_right _ perm_app_comm).trans,
rw ← append_assoc,
exact perm_app_left _ (IH _ _ h) } }
end
theorem revzip_sublists' (l : list α) :
∀ l₁ l₂, (l₁, l₂) ∈ revzip l.sublists' → l₁ ++ l₂ ~ l :=
begin
rw revzip,
induction l with a l IH; intros l₁ l₂ h,
{ simp at h, simp [h] },
{ rw [sublists'_cons, reverse_append, zip_append, ← map_reverse,
zip_map_right, zip_map_left] at h; [simp at h, simp],
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂', h, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁', l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩,
{ exact perm_middle.trans (skip _ (IH _ _ h)) },
{ exact skip _ (IH _ _ h) } }
end
theorem perm_lookmap (f : α → option α) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(H : pairwise (λ a b, ∀ (c ∈ f a) (d ∈ f b), a = b ∧ c = d) l₁)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookmap f l₁ ~ lookmap f l₂ :=
begin
let F := λ a b, ∀ (c ∈ f a) (d ∈ f b), a = b ∧ c = d,
change pairwise F l₁ at H,
induction p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, {simp},
{ cases h : f a,
{ simp [h], exact (IH (pairwise_cons.1 H).2).skip _ },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h], exact p.skip _ } },
{ cases h₁ : f a with c; cases h₂ : f b with d,
{ simp [h₁, h₂], apply swap },
{ simp [h₁, lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₂], apply swap },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₁, h₂], apply swap },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₁, lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₂],
rcases (pairwise_cons.1 H).1 _ (or.inl rfl) _ h₂ _ h₁ with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
refl } },
{ refine (IH₁ H).trans (IH₂ ((perm_pairwise _ p₁).1 H)),
exact λ a b h c h₁ d h₂, (h d h₂ c h₁).imp eq.symm eq.symm }
end
theorem perm_erasep (f : α → Prop) [decidable_pred f] {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(H : pairwise (λ a b, f a → f b → false) l₁)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : erasep f l₁ ~ erasep f l₂ :=
begin
let F := λ a b, f a → f b → false,
change pairwise F l₁ at H,
induction p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, {simp},
{ by_cases h : f a,
{ simp [h, p] },
{ simp [h], exact (IH (pairwise_cons.1 H).2).skip _ } },
{ by_cases h₁ : f a; by_cases h₂ : f b; simp [h₁, h₂],
{ cases (pairwise_cons.1 H).1 _ (or.inl rfl) h₂ h₁ },
{ apply swap } },
{ refine (IH₁ H).trans (IH₂ ((perm_pairwise _ p₁).1 H)),
exact λ a b h h₁ h₂, h h₂ h₁ }
end
/- enumerating permutations -/
section permutations
theorem permutations_aux2_fst (t : α) (ts : list α) (r : list β) : ∀ (ys : list α) (f : list α → β),
(permutations_aux2 t ts r ys f).1 = ys ++ ts
| [] f := rfl
| (y::ys) f := match _, permutations_aux2_fst ys _ : ∀ o : list α × list β, o.1 = ys ++ ts →
(permutations_aux2._match_1 t y f o).1 = y :: ys ++ ts with
| ⟨_, zs⟩, rfl := rfl
end
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux2_snd_nil (t : α) (ts : list α) (r : list β) (f : list α → β) :
(permutations_aux2 t ts r [] f).2 = r := rfl
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux2_snd_cons (t : α) (ts : list α) (r : list β) (y : α) (ys : list α) (f : list α → β) :
(permutations_aux2 t ts r (y::ys) f).2 = f (t :: y :: ys ++ ts) ::
(permutations_aux2 t ts r ys (λx : list α, f (y::x))).2 :=
match _, permutations_aux2_fst t ts r _ _ : ∀ o : list α × list β, o.1 = ys ++ ts →
(permutations_aux2._match_1 t y f o).2 = f (t :: y :: ys ++ ts) :: o.2 with
| ⟨_, zs⟩, rfl := rfl
end
theorem permutations_aux2_append (t : α) (ts : list α) (r : list β) (ys : list α) (f : list α → β) :
(permutations_aux2 t ts nil ys f).2 ++ r = (permutations_aux2 t ts r ys f).2 :=
by induction ys generalizing f; simp *
theorem mem_permutations_aux2 {t : α} {ts : list α} {ys : list α} {l l' : list α} :
l' ∈ (permutations_aux2 t ts [] ys (append l)).2 ↔
∃ l₁ l₂, l₂ ≠ [] ∧ ys = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l' = l ++ l₁ ++ t :: l₂ ++ ts :=
begin
induction ys with y ys ih generalizing l,
{ simp {contextual := tt} },
{ rw [permutations_aux2_snd_cons, show (λ (x : list α), l ++ y :: x) = append (l ++ [y]),
by funext; simp, mem_cons_iff, ih], split; intro h,
{ rcases h with e | ⟨l₁, l₂, l0, ye, _⟩,
{ subst l', exact ⟨[], y::ys, by simp⟩ },
{ substs l' ys, exact ⟨y::l₁, l₂, l0, by simp⟩ } },
{ rcases h with ⟨_ | ⟨y', l₁⟩, l₂, l0, ye, rfl⟩,
{ simp [ye] },
{ simp at ye, rcases ye with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
exact or.inr ⟨l₁, l₂, l0, by simp⟩ } } }
end
theorem mem_permutations_aux2' {t : α} {ts : list α} {ys : list α} {l : list α} :
l ∈ (permutations_aux2 t ts [] ys id).2 ↔
∃ l₁ l₂, l₂ ≠ [] ∧ ys = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l = l₁ ++ t :: l₂ ++ ts :=
by rw [show @id (list α) = append nil, by funext; refl]; apply mem_permutations_aux2
theorem length_permutations_aux2 (t : α) (ts : list α) (ys : list α) (f : list α → β) :
length (permutations_aux2 t ts [] ys f).2 = length ys :=
by induction ys generalizing f; simp *
theorem foldr_permutations_aux2 (t : α) (ts : list α) (r L : list (list α)) :
foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2) r L = L.bind (λ y, (permutations_aux2 t ts [] y id).2) ++ r :=
by induction L with l L ih; [refl, {simp [ih], rw ← permutations_aux2_append}]
theorem mem_foldr_permutations_aux2 {t : α} {ts : list α} {r L : list (list α)} {l' : list α} :
l' ∈ foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2) r L ↔ l' ∈ r ∨
∃ l₁ l₂, l₁ ++ l₂ ∈ L ∧ l₂ ≠ [] ∧ l' = l₁ ++ t :: l₂ ++ ts :=
have (∃ (a : list α), a ∈ L ∧
∃ (l₁ l₂ : list α), ¬l₂ = nil ∧ a = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l' = l₁ ++ t :: (l₂ ++ ts)) ↔
∃ (l₁ l₂ : list α), ¬l₂ = nil ∧ l₁ ++ l₂ ∈ L ∧ l' = l₁ ++ t :: (l₂ ++ ts),
from ⟨λ ⟨a, aL, l₁, l₂, l0, e, h⟩, ⟨l₁, l₂, l0, e ▸ aL, h⟩,
λ ⟨l₁, l₂, l0, aL, h⟩, ⟨_, aL, l₁, l₂, l0, rfl, h⟩⟩,
by rw foldr_permutations_aux2; simp [mem_permutations_aux2', this,
or.comm, or.left_comm, or.assoc, and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc]
theorem length_foldr_permutations_aux2 (t : α) (ts : list α) (r L : list (list α)) :
length (foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2) r L) = sum (map length L) + length r :=
by simp [foldr_permutations_aux2, (∘), length_permutations_aux2]
theorem length_foldr_permutations_aux2' (t : α) (ts : list α) (r L : list (list α))
(n) (H : ∀ l ∈ L, length l = n) :
length (foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2) r L) = n * length L + length r :=
begin
rw [length_foldr_permutations_aux2, (_ : sum (map length L) = n * length L)],
induction L with l L ih, {simp},
simp [ih (λ l m, H l (mem_cons_of_mem _ m)), H l (mem_cons_self _ _), mul_add]
end
theorem perm_of_mem_permutations_aux :
∀ {ts is l : list α}, l ∈ permutations_aux ts is → l ~ ts ++ is :=
begin
refine permutations_aux.rec (by simp) _,
introv IH1 IH2 m,
rw [permutations_aux_cons, permutations, mem_foldr_permutations_aux2] at m,
rcases m with m | ⟨l₁, l₂, m, _, e⟩,
{ exact (IH1 m).trans perm_middle },
{ subst e,
have p : l₁ ++ l₂ ~ is,
{ simp [permutations] at m,
cases m with e m, {simp [e]},
exact is.append_nil ▸ IH2 m },
exact (perm_app_left _ (perm_middle.trans (skip _ p))).trans (skip _ perm_app_comm) }
end
theorem perm_of_mem_permutations {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : l₁ ∈ permutations l₂) : l₁ ~ l₂ :=
(eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).elim (λ e, e ▸ perm.refl _)
(λ m, append_nil l₂ ▸ perm_of_mem_permutations_aux m)
theorem length_permutations_aux :
∀ ts is : list α, length (permutations_aux ts is) + is.length.fact = (length ts + length is).fact :=
begin
refine permutations_aux.rec (by simp) _,
intros t ts is IH1 IH2,
have IH2 : length (permutations_aux is nil) + 1 = is.length.fact,
{ simpa using IH2 },
simp [-add_comm, nat.fact, nat.add_succ, mul_comm] at IH1,
rw [permutations_aux_cons,
length_foldr_permutations_aux2' _ _ _ _ _
(λ l m, perm_length (perm_of_mem_permutations m)),
permutations, length, length, IH2,
nat.succ_add, nat.fact_succ, mul_comm (nat.succ _), ← IH1,
add_comm (_*_), add_assoc, nat.mul_succ, mul_comm]
end
theorem length_permutations (l : list α) : length (permutations l) = (length l).fact :=
length_permutations_aux l []
theorem mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma {is l : list α}
(H : l ~ [] ++ is → (∃ ts' ~ [], l = ts' ++ is) ∨ l ∈ permutations_aux is [])
: l ~ is → l ∈ permutations is :=
by simpa [permutations, perm_nil] using H
theorem mem_permutations_aux_of_perm :
∀ {ts is l : list α}, l ~ is ++ ts → (∃ is' ~ is, l = is' ++ ts) ∨ l ∈ permutations_aux ts is :=
begin
refine permutations_aux.rec (by simp) _,
intros t ts is IH1 IH2 l p,
rw [permutations_aux_cons, mem_foldr_permutations_aux2],
rcases IH1 (p.trans perm_middle) with ⟨is', p', e⟩ | m,
{ clear p, subst e,
rcases mem_split (perm_subset p'.symm (mem_cons_self _ _)) with ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩,
subst is',
have p := perm_cons_inv (perm_middle.symm.trans p'),
cases l₂ with a l₂',
{ exact or.inl ⟨l₁, by simpa using p⟩ },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨l₁, a::l₂',
mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma IH2 p, by simp⟩) } },
{ exact or.inr (or.inl m) }
end
@[simp] theorem mem_permutations (s t : list α) : s ∈ permutations t ↔ s ~ t :=
⟨perm_of_mem_permutations, mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma mem_permutations_aux_of_perm⟩
end permutations
end list
|
cd039ad2d014046739d7dde5f7d073d62f74540f | 592ee40978ac7604005a4e0d35bbc4b467389241 | /Library/generated/mathscheme-lean/NearSemiring.lean | 9fee370c78912191990caf8d17342ad9570c6c0d | [] | no_license | ysharoda/Deriving-Definitions | 3e149e6641fae440badd35ac110a0bd705a49ad2 | dfecb27572022de3d4aa702cae8db19957523a59 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,127,857,700 | 1,615,939,007,000 | 1,615,939,007,000 | 229,785,731 | 4 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,275 | lean | import init.data.nat.basic
import init.data.fin.basic
import data.vector
import .Prelude
open Staged
open nat
open fin
open vector
section NearSemiring
structure NearSemiring (A : Type) : Type :=
(times : (A → (A → A)))
(plus : (A → (A → A)))
(associative_plus : (∀ {x y z : A} , (plus (plus x y) z) = (plus x (plus y z))))
(associative_times : (∀ {x y z : A} , (times (times x y) z) = (times x (times y z))))
(rightDistributive_times_plus : (∀ {x y z : A} , (times (plus y z) x) = (plus (times y x) (times z x))))
open NearSemiring
structure Sig (AS : Type) : Type :=
(timesS : (AS → (AS → AS)))
(plusS : (AS → (AS → AS)))
structure Product (A : Type) : Type :=
(timesP : ((Prod A A) → ((Prod A A) → (Prod A A))))
(plusP : ((Prod A A) → ((Prod A A) → (Prod A A))))
(associative_plusP : (∀ {xP yP zP : (Prod A A)} , (plusP (plusP xP yP) zP) = (plusP xP (plusP yP zP))))
(associative_timesP : (∀ {xP yP zP : (Prod A A)} , (timesP (timesP xP yP) zP) = (timesP xP (timesP yP zP))))
(rightDistributive_times_plusP : (∀ {xP yP zP : (Prod A A)} , (timesP (plusP yP zP) xP) = (plusP (timesP yP xP) (timesP zP xP))))
structure Hom {A1 : Type} {A2 : Type} (Ne1 : (NearSemiring A1)) (Ne2 : (NearSemiring A2)) : Type :=
(hom : (A1 → A2))
(pres_times : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} , (hom ((times Ne1) x1 x2)) = ((times Ne2) (hom x1) (hom x2))))
(pres_plus : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} , (hom ((plus Ne1) x1 x2)) = ((plus Ne2) (hom x1) (hom x2))))
structure RelInterp {A1 : Type} {A2 : Type} (Ne1 : (NearSemiring A1)) (Ne2 : (NearSemiring A2)) : Type 1 :=
(interp : (A1 → (A2 → Type)))
(interp_times : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} {y1 y2 : A2} , ((interp x1 y1) → ((interp x2 y2) → (interp ((times Ne1) x1 x2) ((times Ne2) y1 y2))))))
(interp_plus : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} {y1 y2 : A2} , ((interp x1 y1) → ((interp x2 y2) → (interp ((plus Ne1) x1 x2) ((plus Ne2) y1 y2))))))
inductive NearSemiringTerm : Type
| timesL : (NearSemiringTerm → (NearSemiringTerm → NearSemiringTerm))
| plusL : (NearSemiringTerm → (NearSemiringTerm → NearSemiringTerm))
open NearSemiringTerm
inductive ClNearSemiringTerm (A : Type) : Type
| sing : (A → ClNearSemiringTerm)
| timesCl : (ClNearSemiringTerm → (ClNearSemiringTerm → ClNearSemiringTerm))
| plusCl : (ClNearSemiringTerm → (ClNearSemiringTerm → ClNearSemiringTerm))
open ClNearSemiringTerm
inductive OpNearSemiringTerm (n : ℕ) : Type
| v : ((fin n) → OpNearSemiringTerm)
| timesOL : (OpNearSemiringTerm → (OpNearSemiringTerm → OpNearSemiringTerm))
| plusOL : (OpNearSemiringTerm → (OpNearSemiringTerm → OpNearSemiringTerm))
open OpNearSemiringTerm
inductive OpNearSemiringTerm2 (n : ℕ) (A : Type) : Type
| v2 : ((fin n) → OpNearSemiringTerm2)
| sing2 : (A → OpNearSemiringTerm2)
| timesOL2 : (OpNearSemiringTerm2 → (OpNearSemiringTerm2 → OpNearSemiringTerm2))
| plusOL2 : (OpNearSemiringTerm2 → (OpNearSemiringTerm2 → OpNearSemiringTerm2))
open OpNearSemiringTerm2
def simplifyCl {A : Type} : ((ClNearSemiringTerm A) → (ClNearSemiringTerm A))
| (timesCl x1 x2) := (timesCl (simplifyCl x1) (simplifyCl x2))
| (plusCl x1 x2) := (plusCl (simplifyCl x1) (simplifyCl x2))
| (sing x1) := (sing x1)
def simplifyOpB {n : ℕ} : ((OpNearSemiringTerm n) → (OpNearSemiringTerm n))
| (timesOL x1 x2) := (timesOL (simplifyOpB x1) (simplifyOpB x2))
| (plusOL x1 x2) := (plusOL (simplifyOpB x1) (simplifyOpB x2))
| (v x1) := (v x1)
def simplifyOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} : ((OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A) → (OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A))
| (timesOL2 x1 x2) := (timesOL2 (simplifyOp x1) (simplifyOp x2))
| (plusOL2 x1 x2) := (plusOL2 (simplifyOp x1) (simplifyOp x2))
| (v2 x1) := (v2 x1)
| (sing2 x1) := (sing2 x1)
def evalB {A : Type} : ((NearSemiring A) → (NearSemiringTerm → A))
| Ne (timesL x1 x2) := ((times Ne) (evalB Ne x1) (evalB Ne x2))
| Ne (plusL x1 x2) := ((plus Ne) (evalB Ne x1) (evalB Ne x2))
def evalCl {A : Type} : ((NearSemiring A) → ((ClNearSemiringTerm A) → A))
| Ne (sing x1) := x1
| Ne (timesCl x1 x2) := ((times Ne) (evalCl Ne x1) (evalCl Ne x2))
| Ne (plusCl x1 x2) := ((plus Ne) (evalCl Ne x1) (evalCl Ne x2))
def evalOpB {A : Type} {n : ℕ} : ((NearSemiring A) → ((vector A n) → ((OpNearSemiringTerm n) → A)))
| Ne vars (v x1) := (nth vars x1)
| Ne vars (timesOL x1 x2) := ((times Ne) (evalOpB Ne vars x1) (evalOpB Ne vars x2))
| Ne vars (plusOL x1 x2) := ((plus Ne) (evalOpB Ne vars x1) (evalOpB Ne vars x2))
def evalOp {A : Type} {n : ℕ} : ((NearSemiring A) → ((vector A n) → ((OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A) → A)))
| Ne vars (v2 x1) := (nth vars x1)
| Ne vars (sing2 x1) := x1
| Ne vars (timesOL2 x1 x2) := ((times Ne) (evalOp Ne vars x1) (evalOp Ne vars x2))
| Ne vars (plusOL2 x1 x2) := ((plus Ne) (evalOp Ne vars x1) (evalOp Ne vars x2))
def inductionB {P : (NearSemiringTerm → Type)} : ((∀ (x1 x2 : NearSemiringTerm) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (timesL x1 x2))))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : NearSemiringTerm) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (plusL x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : NearSemiringTerm) , (P x))))
| ptimesl pplusl (timesL x1 x2) := (ptimesl _ _ (inductionB ptimesl pplusl x1) (inductionB ptimesl pplusl x2))
| ptimesl pplusl (plusL x1 x2) := (pplusl _ _ (inductionB ptimesl pplusl x1) (inductionB ptimesl pplusl x2))
def inductionCl {A : Type} {P : ((ClNearSemiringTerm A) → Type)} : ((∀ (x1 : A) , (P (sing x1))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (ClNearSemiringTerm A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (timesCl x1 x2))))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (ClNearSemiringTerm A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (plusCl x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (ClNearSemiringTerm A)) , (P x)))))
| psing ptimescl ppluscl (sing x1) := (psing x1)
| psing ptimescl ppluscl (timesCl x1 x2) := (ptimescl _ _ (inductionCl psing ptimescl ppluscl x1) (inductionCl psing ptimescl ppluscl x2))
| psing ptimescl ppluscl (plusCl x1 x2) := (ppluscl _ _ (inductionCl psing ptimescl ppluscl x1) (inductionCl psing ptimescl ppluscl x2))
def inductionOpB {n : ℕ} {P : ((OpNearSemiringTerm n) → Type)} : ((∀ (fin : (fin n)) , (P (v fin))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpNearSemiringTerm n)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (timesOL x1 x2))))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpNearSemiringTerm n)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (plusOL x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (OpNearSemiringTerm n)) , (P x)))))
| pv ptimesol pplusol (v x1) := (pv x1)
| pv ptimesol pplusol (timesOL x1 x2) := (ptimesol _ _ (inductionOpB pv ptimesol pplusol x1) (inductionOpB pv ptimesol pplusol x2))
| pv ptimesol pplusol (plusOL x1 x2) := (pplusol _ _ (inductionOpB pv ptimesol pplusol x1) (inductionOpB pv ptimesol pplusol x2))
def inductionOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} {P : ((OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A) → Type)} : ((∀ (fin : (fin n)) , (P (v2 fin))) → ((∀ (x1 : A) , (P (sing2 x1))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (timesOL2 x1 x2))))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (plusOL2 x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A)) , (P x))))))
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 pplusol2 (v2 x1) := (pv2 x1)
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 pplusol2 (sing2 x1) := (psing2 x1)
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 pplusol2 (timesOL2 x1 x2) := (ptimesol2 _ _ (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 pplusol2 x1) (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 pplusol2 x2))
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 pplusol2 (plusOL2 x1 x2) := (pplusol2 _ _ (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 pplusol2 x1) (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 pplusol2 x2))
def stageB : (NearSemiringTerm → (Staged NearSemiringTerm))
| (timesL x1 x2) := (stage2 timesL (codeLift2 timesL) (stageB x1) (stageB x2))
| (plusL x1 x2) := (stage2 plusL (codeLift2 plusL) (stageB x1) (stageB x2))
def stageCl {A : Type} : ((ClNearSemiringTerm A) → (Staged (ClNearSemiringTerm A)))
| (sing x1) := (Now (sing x1))
| (timesCl x1 x2) := (stage2 timesCl (codeLift2 timesCl) (stageCl x1) (stageCl x2))
| (plusCl x1 x2) := (stage2 plusCl (codeLift2 plusCl) (stageCl x1) (stageCl x2))
def stageOpB {n : ℕ} : ((OpNearSemiringTerm n) → (Staged (OpNearSemiringTerm n)))
| (v x1) := (const (code (v x1)))
| (timesOL x1 x2) := (stage2 timesOL (codeLift2 timesOL) (stageOpB x1) (stageOpB x2))
| (plusOL x1 x2) := (stage2 plusOL (codeLift2 plusOL) (stageOpB x1) (stageOpB x2))
def stageOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} : ((OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A) → (Staged (OpNearSemiringTerm2 n A)))
| (sing2 x1) := (Now (sing2 x1))
| (v2 x1) := (const (code (v2 x1)))
| (timesOL2 x1 x2) := (stage2 timesOL2 (codeLift2 timesOL2) (stageOp x1) (stageOp x2))
| (plusOL2 x1 x2) := (stage2 plusOL2 (codeLift2 plusOL2) (stageOp x1) (stageOp x2))
structure StagedRepr (A : Type) (Repr : (Type → Type)) : Type :=
(timesT : ((Repr A) → ((Repr A) → (Repr A))))
(plusT : ((Repr A) → ((Repr A) → (Repr A))))
end NearSemiring |
23699cf44793c2c1b06814fab35bf891844b3373 | f2fbd9ce3f46053c664b74a5294d7d2f584e72d3 | /src/groups_TODO.lean | 5fae7802ff3aa37b1a3f1f694914aa87b3b564f6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/lean-perfectoid-spaces | c656ae26a2338ee7a0072dab63baf577f079ca12 | d5ed816bcc116fd4cde5ce9aaf03905d00ee391c | refs/heads/master | 1,584,610,432,107 | 1,538,491,594,000 | 1,538,491,594,000 | 136,299,168 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,528,274,452,000 | 1,528,274,452,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 974 | lean | import group_theory.coset
-- for images
import data.set.basic
-- finsupp for free abelian groups
import data.finsupp
universes u v
variables (G : Type u) [group G] (H : Type v) [group H] (S : set G)
-- maybe use group.in_closure?
theorem closure_image (f : G → H) [is_group_hom f] :
f '' (group.closure (is_group_hom.ker f) ∪ S) = group.closure (f '' S) := sorry
-- don't know why we need decidable equality -- maybe some finsupp reason
example (X : Type u) [decidable_eq X] : add_comm_group (X →₀ ℤ) := by apply_instance
definition group.free_ab_gens (X : Type u) [decidable_eq X] :
X → (X →₀ ℤ) := λ x, finsupp.single x (1 : ℤ)
-- do we have to copy out all of the definitions here?
definition group.add_closure {G : Type u} [add_group G] (S : set G) : set G := sorry
-- maybe use finsupp.induction?
theorem closure_free_gens (X : Type u) [decidable_eq X] :
group.add_closure ((group.free_ab_gens X) '' set.univ) = set.univ := sorry
|
26a7139cb4dfb7a8710c1b98d698fe94a5be658d | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/data/mv_polynomial/default.lean | e90a087f351d360c04973a1134c9e98db3204f6a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 137 | lean | import data.mv_polynomial.basic
import data.mv_polynomial.variables
import data.mv_polynomial.rename
import data.mv_polynomial.comm_ring
|
292e853f199009d6666a0daf65cfba2933e1dead | 206422fb9edabf63def0ed2aa3f489150fb09ccb | /src/data/real/ennreal.lean | 47d52df697c3e4b9d4b05cf7f0eb7edbd4f6ee2f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hamdysalah1/mathlib | b915f86b2503feeae268de369f1b16932321f097 | 95454452f6b3569bf967d35aab8d852b1ddf8017 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,154,116,545 | 1,611,797,994,000 | 1,611,797,994,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 56,382 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.real.nnreal
import data.set.intervals
/-!
# Extended non-negative reals
We define `ennreal := with_no ℝ≥0` to be the type of extended nonnegative real numbers, i.e., the
interval `[0, +∞]`. This type is used as the codomain of a `measure_theory.measure`, and of the
extended distance `edist` in a `emetric_space`. In this file we define some algebraic operations and
a linear order on `ennreal` and prove basic properties of these operations, order, and conversions
to/from `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℕ`.
## Main definitions
* `ennreal`: the extended nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞]`; defined as `with_top ℝ≥0`; it is
equipped with the following structures:
- coercion from `ℝ≥0` defined in the natural way;
- the natural structure of a complete dense linear order: `↑p ≤ ↑q ↔ p ≤ q` and `∀ a, a ≤ ∞`;
- `a + b` is defined so that `↑p + ↑q = ↑(p + q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)` and `a + ∞ = ∞ + a = ∞`;
- `a * b` is defined so that `↑p * ↑q = ↑(p * q)` for `(p q : ℝ≥0)`, `0 * ∞ = ∞ * 0 = 0`, and `a *
∞ = ∞ * a = ∞` for `a ≠ 0`;
- `a - b` is defined as the minimal `d` such that `a ≤ d + b`; this way we have
`↑p - ↑q = ↑(p - q)`, `∞ - ↑p = ∞`, `↑p - ∞ = ∞ - ∞ = 0`; note that there is no negation, only
subtraction;
- `a⁻¹` is defined as `Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}`. This way we have `(↑p)⁻¹ = ↑(p⁻¹)` for
`p : ℝ≥0`, `p ≠ 0`, `0⁻¹ = ∞`, and `∞⁻¹ = 0`.
- `a / b` is defined as `a * b⁻¹`.
The addition and multiplication defined this way together with `0 = ↑0` and `1 = ↑1` turn
`ennreal` into a canonically ordered commutative semiring of characteristic zero.
* Coercions to/from other types:
- coercion `ℝ≥0 → ennreal` is defined as `has_coe`, so one can use `(p : ℝ≥0)` in a context that
expects `a : ennreal`, and Lean will apply `coe` automatically;
- `ennreal.to_nnreal` sends `↑p` to `p` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ennreal.to_real := coe ∘ ennreal.to_nnreal` sends `↑p`, `p : ℝ≥0` to `(↑p : ℝ)` and `∞` to `0`;
- `ennreal.of_real := coe ∘ nnreal.of_real` sends `x : ℝ` to `↑⟨max x 0, _⟩`
- `ennreal.ne_top_equiv_nnreal` is an equivalence between `{a : ennreal // a ≠ 0}` and `ℝ≥0`.
## Implementation notes
We define a `can_lift ennreal ℝ≥0` instance, so one of the ways to prove theorems about an `ennreal`
number `a` is to consider the cases `a = ∞` and `a ≠ ∞`, and use the tactic `lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha`
in the second case. This instance is even more useful if one already has `ha : a ≠ ∞` in the
context, or if we have `(f : α → ennreal) (hf : ∀ x, f x ≠ ∞)`.
## Notations
* `ℝ≥0`: type of nonnegative real numbers `[0, ∞)`; defined in `data.real.nnreal`;
* `∞`: a localized notation in `ennreal` for `⊤ : ennreal`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical set
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- The extended nonnegative real numbers. This is usually denoted [0, ∞],
and is relevant as the codomain of a measure. -/
@[derive canonically_ordered_comm_semiring, derive complete_linear_order, derive densely_ordered,
derive nontrivial]
def ennreal := with_top ℝ≥0
localized "notation `∞` := (⊤ : ennreal)" in ennreal
namespace ennreal
variables {a b c d : ennreal} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
instance : inhabited ennreal := ⟨0⟩
instance : has_coe ℝ≥0 ennreal := ⟨ option.some ⟩
instance : can_lift ennreal ℝ≥0 :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := λ r, r ≠ ∞,
prf := λ x hx, ⟨option.get $ option.ne_none_iff_is_some.1 hx, option.some_get _⟩ }
@[simp] lemma none_eq_top : (none : ennreal) = ∞ := rfl
@[simp] lemma some_eq_coe (a : ℝ≥0) : (some a : ennreal) = (↑a : ennreal) := rfl
/-- `to_nnreal x` returns `x` if it is real, otherwise 0. -/
protected def to_nnreal : ennreal → ℝ≥0
| (some r) := r
| none := 0
/-- `to_real x` returns `x` if it is real, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def to_real (a : ennreal) : real := coe (a.to_nnreal)
/-- `of_real x` returns `x` if it is nonnegative, `0` otherwise. -/
protected def of_real (r : real) : ennreal := coe (nnreal.of_real r)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma to_nnreal_coe : (r : ennreal).to_nnreal = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_nnreal : ∀{a:ennreal}, a ≠ ∞ → ↑(a.to_nnreal) = a
| (some r) h := rfl
| none h := (h rfl).elim
@[simp] lemma of_real_to_real {a : ennreal} (h : a ≠ ∞) : ennreal.of_real (a.to_real) = a :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.of_real, h]
@[simp] lemma to_real_of_real {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ennreal.to_real (ennreal.of_real r) = r :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.of_real, nnreal.coe_of_real _ h]
lemma to_real_of_real' {r : ℝ} : ennreal.to_real (ennreal.of_real r) = max r 0 := rfl
lemma coe_to_nnreal_le_self : ∀{a:ennreal}, ↑(a.to_nnreal) ≤ a
| (some r) := by rw [some_eq_coe, to_nnreal_coe]; exact le_refl _
| none := le_top
lemma coe_nnreal_eq (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ennreal) = ennreal.of_real r :=
by { rw [ennreal.of_real, nnreal.of_real], cases r with r h, congr, dsimp, rw max_eq_left h }
lemma of_real_eq_coe_nnreal {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) :
ennreal.of_real x = @coe ℝ≥0 ennreal _ (⟨x, h⟩ : ℝ≥0) :=
by { rw [coe_nnreal_eq], refl }
@[simp] lemma of_real_coe_nnreal : ennreal.of_real p = p := (coe_nnreal_eq p).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ≥0) = (0 : ennreal) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ↑(1 : ℝ≥0) = (1 : ennreal) := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_real_nonneg {a : ennreal} : 0 ≤ a.to_real := by simp [ennreal.to_real]
@[simp] lemma top_to_nnreal : ∞.to_nnreal = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_to_real : ∞.to_real = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_to_real : (1 : ennreal).to_real = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_to_nnreal : (1 : ennreal).to_nnreal = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_real (r : ℝ≥0) : (r : ennreal).to_real = r := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_to_nnreal : (0 : ennreal).to_nnreal = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_to_real : (0 : ennreal).to_real = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_real_zero : ennreal.of_real (0 : ℝ) = 0 :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]; refl
@[simp] lemma of_real_one : ennreal.of_real (1 : ℝ) = (1 : ennreal) :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
lemma of_real_to_real_le {a : ennreal} : ennreal.of_real (a.to_real) ≤ a :=
if ha : a = ∞ then ha.symm ▸ le_top else le_of_eq (of_real_to_real ha)
lemma forall_ennreal {p : ennreal → Prop} : (∀a, p a) ↔ (∀r:ℝ≥0, p r) ∧ p ∞ :=
⟨assume h, ⟨assume r, h _, h _⟩,
assume ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ a, match a with some r := h₁ _ | none := h₂ end⟩
lemma forall_ne_top {p : ennreal → Prop} : (∀ a ≠ ∞, p a) ↔ ∀ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
option.ball_ne_none
lemma exists_ne_top {p : ennreal → Prop} : (∃ a ≠ ∞, p a) ↔ ∃ r : ℝ≥0, p r :=
option.bex_ne_none
lemma to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff (x : ennreal) : x.to_nnreal = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ :=
⟨begin
cases x,
{ simp [none_eq_top] },
{ have A : some (0:ℝ≥0) = (0:ennreal) := rfl,
simp [ennreal.to_nnreal, A] {contextual := tt} }
end,
by intro h; cases h; simp [h]⟩
lemma to_real_eq_zero_iff (x : ennreal) : x.to_real = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = ∞ :=
by simp [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_top : (r : ennreal) ≠ ∞ := with_top.coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_coe : ∞ ≠ (r : ennreal) := with_top.top_ne_coe
@[simp] lemma of_real_ne_top {r : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real r ≠ ∞ := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_lt_top {r : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real r < ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 of_real_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_of_real {r : ℝ} : ∞ ≠ ennreal.of_real r := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma zero_ne_top : 0 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_zero : ∞ ≠ 0 := top_ne_coe
@[simp] lemma one_ne_top : 1 ≠ ∞ := coe_ne_top
@[simp] lemma top_ne_one : ∞ ≠ 1 := top_ne_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_coe : (↑r : ennreal) = ↑q ↔ r = q := with_top.coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : (↑r : ennreal) ≤ ↑q ↔ r ≤ q := with_top.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : (↑r : ennreal) < ↑q ↔ r < q := with_top.coe_lt_coe
lemma coe_mono : monotone (coe : ℝ≥0 → ennreal) := λ _ _, coe_le_coe.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_zero : (↑r : ennreal) = 0 ↔ r = 0 := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma zero_eq_coe : 0 = (↑r : ennreal) ↔ 0 = r := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_one : (↑r : ennreal) = 1 ↔ r = 1 := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_eq_coe : 1 = (↑r : ennreal) ↔ 1 = r := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonneg : 0 ≤ (↑r : ennreal) ↔ 0 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pos : 0 < (↑r : ennreal) ↔ 0 < r := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : ↑(r + p) = (r + p : ennreal) := with_top.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul : ↑(r * p) = (r * p : ennreal) := with_top.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bit0 : (↑(bit0 r) : ennreal) = bit0 r := coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bit1 : (↑(bit1 r) : ennreal) = bit1 r := by simp [bit1]
lemma coe_two : ((2:ℝ≥0) : ennreal) = 2 := by norm_cast
protected lemma zero_lt_one : 0 < (1 : ennreal) :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.zero_lt_one
@[simp] lemma one_lt_two : (1 : ennreal) < 2 :=
coe_one ▸ coe_two ▸ by exact_mod_cast (@one_lt_two ℕ _ _)
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_two : (0:ennreal) < 2 := lt_trans ennreal.zero_lt_one one_lt_two
lemma two_ne_zero : (2:ennreal) ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt zero_lt_two).symm
lemma two_ne_top : (2:ennreal) ≠ ∞ := coe_two ▸ coe_ne_top
/-- The set of `ennreal` numbers that are not equal to `∞` is equivalent to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ne_top_equiv_nnreal : {a | a ≠ ∞} ≃ ℝ≥0 :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ennreal.to_nnreal x,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, coe_ne_top⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨x, hx⟩, subtype.eq $ coe_to_nnreal hx,
right_inv := λ x, to_nnreal_coe }
lemma cinfi_ne_top [has_Inf α] (f : ennreal → α) : (⨅ x : {x // x ≠ ∞}, f x) = ⨅ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
eq.symm $ infi_congr _ ne_top_equiv_nnreal.symm.surjective $ λ x, rfl
lemma infi_ne_top [complete_lattice α] (f : ennreal → α) : (⨅ x ≠ ∞, f x) = ⨅ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
by rw [infi_subtype', cinfi_ne_top]
lemma csupr_ne_top [has_Sup α] (f : ennreal → α) : (⨆ x : {x // x ≠ ∞}, f x) = ⨆ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
@cinfi_ne_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma supr_ne_top [complete_lattice α] (f : ennreal → α) : (⨆ x ≠ ∞, f x) = ⨆ x : ℝ≥0, f x :=
@infi_ne_top (order_dual α) _ _
lemma infi_ennreal {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ennreal → α} :
(⨅ n, f n) = (⨅ n : ℝ≥0, f n) ⊓ f ∞ :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf (le_infi $ assume i, infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _))
(le_infi $ forall_ennreal.2 ⟨assume r, inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le _ _, inf_le_right⟩)
lemma supr_ennreal {α : Type*} [complete_lattice α] {f : ennreal → α} :
(⨆ n, f n) = (⨆ n : ℝ≥0, f n) ⊔ f ∞ :=
@infi_ennreal (order_dual α) _ _
@[simp] lemma add_top : a + ∞ = ∞ := with_top.add_top
@[simp] lemma top_add : ∞ + a = ∞ := with_top.top_add
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ennreal` as a `ring_hom`. -/
def of_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0 →+* ennreal :=
⟨coe, coe_one, λ _ _, coe_mul, coe_zero, λ _ _, coe_add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_of_nnreal_hom : ⇑of_nnreal_hom = coe := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_indicator {α} (s : set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ennreal) = s.indicator (λ x, f x) a :=
(of_nnreal_hom : ℝ≥0 →+ ennreal).map_indicator _ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(r^n) : ennreal) = r^n :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_pow r n
@[simp] lemma add_eq_top : a + b = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ ∨ b = ∞ := with_top.add_eq_top
@[simp] lemma add_lt_top : a + b < ∞ ↔ a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞ := with_top.add_lt_top
lemma to_nnreal_add {r₁ r₂ : ennreal} (h₁ : r₁ < ∞) (h₂ : r₂ < ∞) :
(r₁ + r₂).to_nnreal = r₁.to_nnreal + r₂.to_nnreal :=
begin
rw [← coe_eq_coe, coe_add, coe_to_nnreal, coe_to_nnreal, coe_to_nnreal];
apply @ne_top_of_lt ennreal _ _ ∞,
exact h₂,
exact h₁,
exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
end
/- rw has trouble with the generic lt_top_iff_ne_top and bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
(contrary to erw). This is solved with the next lemmas -/
protected lemma lt_top_iff_ne_top : a < ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top
protected lemma bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
lemma not_lt_top {x : ennreal} : ¬ x < ∞ ↔ x = ∞ := by rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, not_not]
lemma add_ne_top : a + b ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using add_lt_top
lemma mul_top : a * ∞ = (if a = 0 then 0 else ∞) :=
begin split_ifs, { simp [h] }, { exact with_top.mul_top h } end
lemma top_mul : ∞ * a = (if a = 0 then 0 else ∞) :=
begin split_ifs, { simp [h] }, { exact with_top.top_mul h } end
@[simp] lemma top_mul_top : ∞ * ∞ = ∞ := with_top.top_mul_top
lemma top_pow {n:ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : ∞^n = ∞ :=
nat.le_induction (pow_one _) (λ m hm hm', by rw [pow_succ, hm', top_mul_top])
_ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h)
lemma mul_eq_top : a * b = ∞ ↔ (a ≠ 0 ∧ b = ∞) ∨ (a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ 0) :=
with_top.mul_eq_top_iff
lemma mul_lt_top : a < ∞ → b < ∞ → a * b < ∞ :=
with_top.mul_lt_top
lemma mul_ne_top : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → a * b ≠ ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using mul_lt_top
lemma ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (h : a * b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a ≠ ∞ :=
by { simp [mul_eq_top, hb, not_or_distrib] at h ⊢, exact h.2 }
lemma ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_right (h : a * b ≠ ∞) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b ≠ ∞ :=
ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
lemma lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left (h : a * b < ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a < ∞ :=
by { rw [ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top] at h ⊢, exact ne_top_of_mul_ne_top_left h hb }
lemma lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right (h : a * b < ∞) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b < ∞ :=
lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
lemma mul_lt_top_iff {a b : ennreal} : a * b < ∞ ↔ (a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞) ∨ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, rw [← or_assoc, or_iff_not_imp_right, or_iff_not_imp_right], intros hb ha,
exact ⟨lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_left h hb, lt_top_of_mul_lt_top_right h ha⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩|rfl|rfl); [exact mul_lt_top ha hb, simp, simp] }
end
@[simp] lemma mul_pos : 0 < a * b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b :=
by simp only [pos_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, mul_eq_zero, not_or_distrib]
lemma pow_eq_top : ∀ n:ℕ, a^n=∞ → a=∞
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := λ o, (mul_eq_top.1 o).elim (λ h, pow_eq_top n h.2) and.left
lemma pow_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) {n:ℕ} : a^n ≠ ∞ :=
mt (pow_eq_top n) h
lemma pow_lt_top : a < ∞ → ∀ n:ℕ, a^n < ∞ :=
by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using pow_ne_top
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(∑ a in s, f a) = (∑ a in s, f a : ennreal) :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_sum f s
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_prod {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(∏ a in s, f a) = ((∏ a in s, f a) : ennreal) :=
of_nnreal_hom.map_prod f s
section order
@[simp] lemma bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : ennreal) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_lt_top : coe r < ∞ := with_top.coe_lt_top r
@[simp] lemma not_top_le_coe : ¬ ∞ ≤ ↑r := with_top.not_top_le_coe r
lemma zero_lt_coe_iff : 0 < (↑p : ennreal) ↔ 0 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_le_coe_iff : (1:ennreal) ≤ ↑r ↔ 1 ≤ r := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_one_iff : ↑r ≤ (1:ennreal) ↔ r ≤ 1 := coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_one_iff : (↑p : ennreal) < 1 ↔ p < 1 := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_lt_coe_iff : 1 < (↑p : ennreal) ↔ 1 < p := coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ≥0) : ennreal) = n := with_top.coe_nat n
@[simp] lemma of_real_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ennreal.of_real n = n := by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma nat_ne_top (n : ℕ) : (n : ennreal) ≠ ∞ := with_top.nat_ne_top n
@[simp] lemma top_ne_nat (n : ℕ) : ∞ ≠ n := with_top.top_ne_nat n
@[simp] lemma one_lt_top : 1 < ∞ := coe_lt_top
lemma le_coe_iff : a ≤ ↑r ↔ (∃p:ℝ≥0, a = p ∧ p ≤ r) := with_top.le_coe_iff
lemma coe_le_iff : ↑r ≤ a ↔ (∀p:ℝ≥0, a = p → r ≤ p) := with_top.coe_le_iff
lemma lt_iff_exists_coe : a < b ↔ (∃p:ℝ≥0, a = p ∧ ↑p < b) := with_top.lt_iff_exists_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_finset_sup {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
↑(s.sup f) = s.sup (λ x, (f x : ennreal)) :=
finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total _ coe_mono rfl
lemma pow_le_pow {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
begin
cases a,
{ cases m,
{ rw eq_bot_iff.mpr h,
exact le_refl _ },
{ rw [none_eq_top, top_pow (nat.succ_pos m)],
exact le_top } },
{ rw [some_eq_coe, ← coe_pow, ← coe_pow, coe_le_coe],
exact pow_le_pow (by simpa using ha) h }
end
@[simp] lemma max_eq_zero_iff : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
by simp only [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.symm, max_le_iff]
@[simp] lemma max_zero_left : max 0 a = a := max_eq_right (zero_le a)
@[simp] lemma max_zero_right : max a 0 = a := max_eq_left (zero_le a)
-- TODO: why this is not a `rfl`? There is some hidden diamond here.
@[simp] lemma sup_eq_max : a ⊔ b = max a b :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, sup_le_iff.trans max_le_iff.symm
protected lemma pow_pos : 0 < a → ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < a^n :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.pow_pos
protected lemma pow_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 → ∀ n : ℕ, a^n ≠ 0 :=
by simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using ennreal.pow_pos
@[simp] lemma not_lt_zero : ¬ a < 0 := by simp
lemma add_lt_add_iff_left : a < ∞ → (a + c < a + b ↔ c < b) :=
with_top.add_lt_add_iff_left
lemma add_lt_add_iff_right : a < ∞ → (c + a < b + a ↔ c < b) :=
with_top.add_lt_add_iff_right
lemma lt_add_right (ha : a < ∞) (hb : 0 < b) : a < a + b :=
by rwa [← add_lt_add_iff_left ha, add_zero] at hb
lemma le_of_forall_pos_le_add : ∀{a b : ennreal}, (∀ε:ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → b < ∞ → a ≤ b + ε) → a ≤ b
| a none h := le_top
| none (some a) h :=
have ∞ ≤ ↑a + ↑(1:ℝ≥0), from h 1 zero_lt_one coe_lt_top,
by rw [← coe_add] at this; exact (not_top_le_coe this).elim
| (some a) (some b) h :=
by simp only [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, coe_add.symm, coe_le_coe, coe_lt_top, true_implies_iff]
at *; exact nnreal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add h
lemma lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃q:ℚ, 0 ≤ q ∧ a < nnreal.of_real q ∧ (nnreal.of_real q:ennreal) < b) :=
⟨λ h,
begin
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 h with ⟨p, rfl, _⟩,
rcases exists_between h with ⟨c, pc, cb⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 cb with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩,
rcases (nnreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn _ _).1 (coe_lt_coe.1 pc) with ⟨q, hq0, pq, qr⟩,
exact ⟨q, hq0, coe_lt_coe.2 pq, lt_trans (coe_lt_coe.2 qr) cb⟩
end,
λ ⟨q, q0, qa, qb⟩, lt_trans qa qb⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_real_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃r:ℝ, 0 ≤ r ∧ a < ennreal.of_real r ∧ (ennreal.of_real r:ennreal) < b) :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨q, q0, aq, qb⟩ := ennreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h in
⟨q, rat.cast_nonneg.2 q0, aq, qb⟩,
λ ⟨q, q0, qa, qb⟩, lt_trans qa qb⟩
lemma lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn :
a < b ↔ (∃r:ℝ≥0, a < r ∧ (r : ennreal) < b) :=
with_top.lt_iff_exists_coe_btwn
lemma lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt : a < b ↔ (∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ a + r < b) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hab, _, λ ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right (le_refl _)) hr⟩,
cases a, { simpa using hab },
rcases lt_iff_exists_real_btwn.1 hab with ⟨c, c_nonneg, ac, cb⟩,
let d : ℝ≥0 := ⟨c, c_nonneg⟩,
have ad : a < d,
{ rw of_real_eq_coe_nnreal c_nonneg at ac,
exact coe_lt_coe.1 ac },
refine ⟨d-a, nnreal.sub_pos.2 ad, _⟩,
rw [some_eq_coe, ← coe_add],
convert cb,
have : nnreal.of_real c = d,
by { rw [← nnreal.coe_eq, nnreal.coe_of_real _ c_nonneg], refl },
rw [add_comm, this],
exact nnreal.sub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt ad)
end
lemma coe_nat_lt_coe {n : ℕ} : (n : ennreal) < r ↔ ↑n < r := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_coe
lemma coe_lt_coe_nat {n : ℕ} : (r : ennreal) < n ↔ r < n := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_lt_coe
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_lt_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} : (m : ennreal) < n ↔ m < n :=
ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_nat_lt_coe.trans nat.cast_lt
lemma coe_nat_ne_top {n : ℕ} : (n : ennreal) ≠ ∞ := ennreal.coe_nat n ▸ coe_ne_top
lemma coe_nat_mono : strict_mono (coe : ℕ → ennreal) := λ _ _, coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.2
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_le_coe_nat {m n : ℕ} : (m : ennreal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
coe_nat_mono.le_iff_le
instance : char_zero ennreal := ⟨coe_nat_mono.injective⟩
protected lemma exists_nat_gt {r : ennreal} (h : r ≠ ∞) : ∃n:ℕ, r < n :=
begin
lift r to ℝ≥0 using h,
rcases exists_nat_gt r with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact ⟨n, coe_lt_coe_nat.2 hn⟩,
end
lemma add_lt_add (ac : a < c) (bd : b < d) : a + b < c + d :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt ac,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt bd,
cases c, { simp }, cases d, { simp },
simp only [← coe_add, some_eq_coe, coe_lt_coe] at *,
exact add_lt_add ac bd
end
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_min : ((min r p:ℝ≥0):ennreal) = min r p :=
coe_mono.map_min
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_max : ((max r p:ℝ≥0):ennreal) = max r p :=
coe_mono.map_max
lemma le_of_top_imp_top_of_to_nnreal_le {a b : ennreal} (h : a = ⊤ → b = ⊤)
(h_nnreal : a ≠ ⊤ → b ≠ ⊤ → a.to_nnreal ≤ b.to_nnreal) :
a ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = ⊤,
{ rw h ha,
exact le_top, },
by_cases hb : b = ⊤,
{ rw hb,
exact le_top, },
rw [←coe_to_nnreal hb, ←coe_to_nnreal ha, coe_le_coe],
exact h_nnreal ha hb,
end
end order
section complete_lattice
lemma coe_Sup {s : set ℝ≥0} : bdd_above s → (↑(Sup s) : ennreal) = (⨆a∈s, ↑a) := with_top.coe_Sup
lemma coe_Inf {s : set ℝ≥0} : s.nonempty → (↑(Inf s) : ennreal) = (⨅a∈s, ↑a) := with_top.coe_Inf
@[simp] lemma top_mem_upper_bounds {s : set ennreal} : ∞ ∈ upper_bounds s :=
assume x hx, le_top
lemma coe_mem_upper_bounds {s : set ℝ≥0} :
↑r ∈ upper_bounds ((coe : ℝ≥0 → ennreal) '' s) ↔ r ∈ upper_bounds s :=
by simp [upper_bounds, ball_image_iff, -mem_image, *] {contextual := tt}
end complete_lattice
section mul
@[mono] lemma mul_le_mul : a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a * c ≤ b * d :=
canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul
@[mono] lemma mul_lt_mul (ac : a < c) (bd : b < d) : a * b < c * d :=
begin
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ac with ⟨a', aa', a'c⟩,
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt aa',
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 bd with ⟨b', bb', b'd⟩,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt bb',
norm_cast at *,
calc ↑(a * b) < ↑(a' * b') :
coe_lt_coe.2 (mul_lt_mul' aa'.le bb' (zero_le _) ((zero_le a).trans_lt aa'))
... = ↑a' * ↑b' : coe_mul
... ≤ c * d : mul_le_mul a'c.le b'd.le
end
lemma mul_left_mono : monotone ((*) a) := λ b c, mul_le_mul (le_refl a)
lemma mul_right_mono : monotone (λ x, x * a) := λ b c h, mul_le_mul h (le_refl a)
lemma max_mul : max a b * c = max (a * c) (b * c) :=
mul_right_mono.map_max
lemma mul_max : a * max b c = max (a * b) (a * c) :=
mul_left_mono.map_max
lemma mul_eq_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b = a * c ↔ b = c) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; cases c;
simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm,
nnreal.mul_eq_mul_left] {contextual := tt},
end
lemma mul_eq_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c = b * c ↔ a = b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_eq_mul_left
lemma mul_le_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; cases c;
simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm] {contextual := tt},
assume h, exact mul_le_mul_left (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
end
lemma mul_le_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c ≤ b * c ↔ a ≤ b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_le_mul_left
lemma mul_lt_mul_left : a ≠ 0 → a ≠ ∞ → (a * b < a * c ↔ b < c) :=
λ h0 ht, by simp only [mul_le_mul_left h0 ht, lt_iff_le_not_le]
lemma mul_lt_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c < b * c ↔ a < b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_lt_mul_left
end mul
section sub
instance : has_sub ennreal := ⟨λa b, Inf {d | a ≤ d + b}⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : ↑(p - r) = (↑p:ennreal) - r :=
le_antisymm
(le_Inf $ assume b (hb : ↑p ≤ b + r), coe_le_iff.2 $
by rintros d rfl; rwa [← coe_add, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.sub_le_iff_le_add] at hb)
(Inf_le $ show (↑p : ennreal) ≤ ↑(p - r) + ↑r,
by rw [← coe_add, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.sub_le_iff_le_add])
@[simp] lemma top_sub_coe : ∞ - ↑r = ∞ :=
top_unique $ le_Inf $ by simp [add_eq_top]
@[simp] lemma sub_eq_zero_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : a - b = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ le_add_left h) (zero_le _)
@[simp] lemma sub_self : a - a = 0 := sub_eq_zero_of_le $ le_refl _
@[simp] lemma zero_sub : 0 - a = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ zero_le $ 0 + a) (zero_le _)
@[simp] lemma sub_infty : a - ∞ = 0 :=
le_antisymm (Inf_le $ by simp) (zero_le _)
lemma sub_le_sub (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : d ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b - d :=
Inf_le_Inf $ assume e (h : b ≤ e + d),
calc a ≤ b : h₁
... ≤ e + d : h
... ≤ e + c : add_le_add (le_refl _) h₂
@[simp] lemma add_sub_self : ∀{a b : ennreal}, b < ∞ → (a + b) - b = a
| a none := by simp [none_eq_top]
| none (some b) := by simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe]
| (some a) (some b) :=
by simp [some_eq_coe]; rw [← coe_add, ← coe_sub, coe_eq_coe, nnreal.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] lemma add_sub_self' (h : a < ∞) : (a + b) - a = b :=
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_self h]
lemma add_right_inj (h : a < ∞) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
⟨λ e, by simpa [h] using congr_arg (λ x, x - a) e, congr_arg _⟩
lemma add_left_inj (h : a < ∞) : b + a = c + a ↔ b = c :=
by rw [add_comm, add_comm c, add_right_inj h]
@[simp] lemma sub_add_cancel_of_le : ∀{a b : ennreal}, b ≤ a → (a - b) + b = a :=
begin
simp [forall_ennreal, le_coe_iff, -add_comm] {contextual := tt},
rintros r p x rfl h,
rw [← coe_sub, ← coe_add, nnreal.sub_add_cancel_of_le h]
end
@[simp] lemma add_sub_cancel_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
by rwa [add_comm, sub_add_cancel_of_le]
lemma sub_add_self_eq_max : (a - b) + b = max a b :=
match le_total a b with
| or.inl h := by simp [h, max_eq_right]
| or.inr h := by simp [h, max_eq_left]
end
lemma le_sub_add_self : a ≤ (a - b) + b :=
by { rw sub_add_self_eq_max, exact le_max_left a b }
@[simp] protected lemma sub_le_iff_le_add : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b :=
iff.intro
(assume h : a - b ≤ c,
calc a ≤ (a - b) + b : le_sub_add_self
... ≤ c + b : add_le_add_right h _)
(assume h : a ≤ c + b, Inf_le h)
protected lemma sub_le_iff_le_add' : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
add_comm c b ▸ ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add
lemma sub_eq_of_add_eq : b ≠ ∞ → a + b = c → c - b = a :=
λ hb hc, hc ▸ add_sub_self (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hb)
protected lemma sub_le_of_sub_le (h : a - b ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ by { rw add_comm, exact ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 h }
protected lemma sub_lt_self : a ≠ ∞ → a ≠ 0 → 0 < b → a - b < a :=
match a, b with
| none, _ := by { have := none_eq_top, assume h, contradiction }
| (some a), none := by {intros, simp only [none_eq_top, sub_infty, pos_iff_ne_zero], assumption}
| (some a), (some b) :=
begin
simp only [some_eq_coe, coe_sub.symm, coe_pos, coe_eq_zero, coe_lt_coe, ne.def],
assume h₁ h₂, apply nnreal.sub_lt_self, exact pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h₂
end
end
@[simp] lemma sub_eq_zero_iff_le : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simpa [-ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add] using @ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add a b 0
@[simp] lemma zero_lt_sub_iff_lt : 0 < a - b ↔ b < a :=
by simpa [ennreal.bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, -sub_eq_zero_iff_le]
using not_iff_not.2 (@sub_eq_zero_iff_le a b)
lemma lt_sub_iff_add_lt : a < b - c ↔ a + c < b :=
begin
cases a, { simp },
cases c, { simp },
cases b, { simp only [true_iff, coe_lt_top, some_eq_coe, top_sub_coe, none_eq_top, ← coe_add] },
simp only [some_eq_coe],
rw [← coe_add, ← coe_sub, coe_lt_coe, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.lt_sub_iff_add_lt],
end
lemma sub_le_self (a b : ennreal) : a - b ≤ a :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ le_add_right (le_refl a)
@[simp] lemma sub_zero : a - 0 = a :=
eq.trans (add_zero (a - 0)).symm $ by simp
/-- A version of triangle inequality for difference as a "distance". -/
lemma sub_le_sub_add_sub : a - c ≤ a - b + (b - c) :=
ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $
calc a ≤ a - b + b : le_sub_add_self
... ≤ a - b + ((b - c) + c) : add_le_add_left le_sub_add_self _
... = a - b + (b - c) + c : (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
lemma sub_sub_cancel (h : a < ∞) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a - (a - b) = b :=
by rw [← add_left_inj (lt_of_le_of_lt (sub_le_self _ _) h),
sub_add_cancel_of_le (sub_le_self _ _), add_sub_cancel_of_le h2]
lemma sub_right_inj {a b c : ennreal} (ha : a < ∞) (hb : b ≤ a) (hc : c ≤ a) :
a - b = a - c ↔ b = c :=
iff.intro
begin
assume h, have : a - (a - b) = a - (a - c), rw h,
rw [sub_sub_cancel ha hb, sub_sub_cancel ha hc] at this, exact this
end
(λ h, by rw h)
lemma sub_mul (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ ∞) : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c :=
begin
cases le_or_lt a b with hab hab,
{ simp [hab, mul_right_mono hab] },
symmetry,
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le b) with hb hb,
{ subst b, simp },
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq,
{ exact mul_ne_top (ne_top_of_lt hab) (h hb hab) },
rw [← add_mul, sub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hab)]
end
lemma mul_sub (h : 0 < c → c < b → a ≠ ∞) :
a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
by { simp only [mul_comm a], exact sub_mul h }
lemma sub_mul_ge : a * c - b * c ≤ (a - b) * c :=
begin
-- with `0 < b → b < a → c ≠ ∞` Lean names the first variable `a`
by_cases h : ∀ (hb : 0 < b), b < a → c ≠ ∞,
{ rw [sub_mul h],
exact le_refl _ },
{ push_neg at h,
rcases h with ⟨hb, hba, hc⟩,
subst c,
simp only [mul_top, if_neg (ne_of_gt hb), if_neg (ne_of_gt $ lt_trans hb hba), sub_self,
zero_le] }
end
end sub
section sum
open finset
/-- A product of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma prod_lt_top {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} (h : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) : (∏ a in s, f a) < ∞ :=
with_top.prod_lt_top h
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} :
(∀a∈s, f a < ∞) → ∑ a in s, f a < ∞ :=
with_top.sum_lt_top
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top_iff {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} :
∑ a in s, f a < ∞ ↔ (∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :=
with_top.sum_lt_top_iff
/-- A sum of numbers is infinite iff one of them is infinite -/
lemma sum_eq_top_iff {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} :
(∑ x in s, f x) = ∞ ↔ (∃a∈s, f a = ∞) :=
with_top.sum_eq_top_iff
/-- seeing `ennreal` as `ℝ≥0` does not change their sum, unless one of the `ennreal` is
infinity -/
lemma to_nnreal_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} (hf : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :
ennreal.to_nnreal (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, ennreal.to_nnreal (f a) :=
begin
rw [← coe_eq_coe, coe_to_nnreal, coe_finset_sum, sum_congr],
{ refl },
{ intros x hx, exact (coe_to_nnreal (hf x hx).ne).symm },
{ exact (sum_lt_top hf).ne }
end
/-- seeing `ennreal` as `real` does not change their sum, unless one of the `ennreal` is infinity -/
lemma to_real_sum {s : finset α} {f : α → ennreal} (hf : ∀a∈s, f a < ∞) :
ennreal.to_real (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, ennreal.to_real (f a) :=
by { rw [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_sum hf, nnreal.coe_sum], refl }
lemma of_real_sum_of_nonneg {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → 0 ≤ f i) :
ennreal.of_real (∑ i in s, f i) = ∑ i in s, ennreal.of_real (f i) :=
begin
simp_rw [ennreal.of_real, ←coe_finset_sum, coe_eq_coe],
exact nnreal.of_real_sum_of_nonneg hf,
end
end sum
section interval
variables {x y z : ennreal} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ennreal} {s : set ennreal}
protected lemma Ico_eq_Iio : (Ico 0 y) = (Iio y) :=
ext $ assume a, iff.intro
(assume ⟨_, hx⟩, hx)
(assume hx, ⟨zero_le _, hx⟩)
lemma mem_Iio_self_add : x ≠ ∞ → 0 < ε → x ∈ Iio (x + ε) :=
assume xt ε0, lt_add_right (by rwa lt_top_iff_ne_top) ε0
lemma not_mem_Ioo_self_sub : x = 0 → x ∉ Ioo (x - ε) y :=
assume x0, by simp [x0]
lemma mem_Ioo_self_sub_add : x ≠ ∞ → x ≠ 0 → 0 < ε₁ → 0 < ε₂ → x ∈ Ioo (x - ε₁) (x + ε₂) :=
assume xt x0 ε0 ε0',
⟨ennreal.sub_lt_self xt x0 ε0, lt_add_right (by rwa [lt_top_iff_ne_top]) ε0'⟩
end interval
section bit
@[simp] lemma bit0_inj : bit0 a = bit0 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λh, begin
rcases (lt_trichotomy a b) with h₁| h₂| h₃,
{ exact (absurd h (ne_of_lt (add_lt_add h₁ h₁))) },
{ exact h₂ },
{ exact (absurd h.symm (ne_of_lt (add_lt_add h₃ h₃))) }
end,
λh, congr_arg _ h⟩
@[simp] lemma bit0_eq_zero_iff : bit0 a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [bit0_zero] using @bit0_inj a 0
@[simp] lemma bit0_eq_top_iff : bit0 a = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ :=
by rw [bit0, add_eq_top, or_self]
@[simp] lemma bit1_inj : bit1 a = bit1 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨λh, begin
unfold bit1 at h,
rwa [add_left_inj, bit0_inj] at h,
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top]
end,
λh, congr_arg _ h⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_ne_zero : bit1 a ≠ 0 :=
by unfold bit1; simp
@[simp] lemma bit1_eq_one_iff : bit1 a = 1 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simpa only [bit1_zero] using @bit1_inj a 0
@[simp] lemma bit1_eq_top_iff : bit1 a = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ :=
by unfold bit1; rw add_eq_top; simp
end bit
section inv
instance : has_inv ennreal := ⟨λa, Inf {b | 1 ≤ a * b}⟩
instance : div_inv_monoid ennreal :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
.. (infer_instance : monoid ennreal) }
@[simp] lemma inv_zero : (0 : ennreal)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show Inf {b : ennreal | 1 ≤ 0 * b} = ∞, by simp; refl
@[simp] lemma inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique $ le_of_forall_le_of_dense $ λ a (h : a > 0), Inf_le $ by simp [*, ne_of_gt h, top_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ennreal) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_antisymm
(le_Inf $ assume b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b), coe_le_iff.2 $
by rintros b rfl; rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.inv_le hr] at hb)
(Inf_le $ by simp; rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr]; exact le_refl 1)
lemma coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ennreal) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
if hr : r = 0 then by simp only [hr, inv_zero, coe_zero, le_top]
else by simp only [coe_inv hr, le_refl]
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹:ℝ≥0):ennreal) = 2⁻¹ :=
by rw [coe_inv (ne_of_gt _root_.zero_lt_two), coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ennreal) = p / r :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
@[simp] lemma inv_one : (1:ennreal)⁻¹ = 1 :=
by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_eq_coe.2 inv_one
@[simp] lemma div_one {a : ennreal} : a / 1 = a :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_one, mul_one]
protected lemma inv_pow {n : ℕ} : (a^n)⁻¹ = (a⁻¹)^n :=
begin
by_cases a = 0; cases a; cases n; simp [*, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
zero_pow, top_pow, nat.zero_lt_succ] at *,
rw [← coe_inv h, ← coe_pow, ← coe_inv (pow_ne_zero _ h), ← inv_pow', coe_pow]
end
@[simp] lemma inv_inv : (a⁻¹)⁻¹ = a :=
by by_cases a = 0; cases a; simp [*, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
-coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm] at *
lemma inv_involutive : function.involutive (λ a:ennreal, a⁻¹) :=
λ a, ennreal.inv_inv
lemma inv_bijective : function.bijective (λ a:ennreal, a⁻¹) :=
ennreal.inv_involutive.bijective
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b := inv_bijective.1.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 :=
inv_zero ▸ inv_eq_inv
lemma inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_top {x : ennreal} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x :=
by { simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero] }
lemma div_lt_top {x y : ennreal} (h1 : x < ∞) (h2 : 0 < y) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1 (inv_lt_top.mpr h2)
@[simp] lemma inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_eq_inv
lemma inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
@[simp] lemma inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans inv_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
begin
cases a; cases b; simp only [some_eq_coe, none_eq_top, inv_top],
{ simp only [lt_irrefl] },
{ exact inv_pos.trans lt_top_iff_ne_top.symm },
{ simp only [not_lt_zero, not_top_lt] },
{ cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le a) with ha ha;
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le b) with hb hb,
{ subst a, subst b, simp },
{ subst a, simp },
{ subst b, simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top] },
{ rw [← coe_inv (ne_of_gt ha), ← coe_inv (ne_of_gt hb), coe_lt_coe, coe_lt_coe],
simp only [nnreal.coe_lt_coe.symm] at *,
exact inv_lt_inv ha hb } }
end
lemma inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
lemma lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp, priority 1100] -- higher than le_inv_iff_mul_le
lemma inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
by simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, inv_lt_inv, inv_eq_inv, eq_comm]
lemma inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
lemma le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [inv_inv] using @inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a :=
inv_lt_iff_inv_lt.trans $ by rw [inv_one]
@[simp] lemma div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul]
lemma top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ :=
by { lift a to ℝ≥0 using h, exact top_div_coe }
lemma top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ :=
top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
lemma top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ :=
by by_cases a = ∞; simp [top_div_of_ne_top, *]
@[simp] lemma zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
lemma div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ (a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨ (a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞) :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.mul_eq_top]
lemma le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c :=
begin
cases b,
{ simp at ht,
split,
{ assume ha, simp at ha, simp [ha] },
{ contrapose,
assume ha,
simp at ha,
have : a * ∞ = ∞, by simp [ennreal.mul_eq_top, ha],
simp [this, ht] } },
by_cases hb : b ≠ 0,
{ have : (b : ennreal) ≠ 0, by simp [hb],
rw [← ennreal.mul_le_mul_left this coe_ne_top],
suffices : ↑b * a ≤ (↑b * ↑b⁻¹) * c ↔ a * ↑b ≤ c,
{ simpa [some_eq_coe, div_eq_mul_inv, hb, mul_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc] },
rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hb, coe_one, one_mul, mul_comm] },
{ simp at hb,
simp [hb] at h0,
have : c / 0 = ∞, by simp [div_eq_top, h0],
simp [hb, this] }
end
lemma div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
begin
suffices : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹, by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv],
refine (le_div_iff_mul_le _ _).symm; simpa
end
lemma div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases h0 : c = 0,
{ have : a = 0, by simpa [h0] using h, simp [*] },
by_cases hinf : c = ∞, by simp [hinf],
exact (div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h0) (or.inl hinf)).2 h
end
protected lemma div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
lemma mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b :=
by { contrapose! h, exact ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul h }
lemma inv_le_iff_le_mul : (b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) → (a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) → (a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b) :=
begin
cases a; cases b; simp [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, mul_top, top_mul] {contextual := tt},
by_cases a = 0; simp [*, -coe_mul, coe_mul.symm, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm, nnreal.inv_le]
end
@[simp] lemma le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases b, { by_cases a = 0; simp [*, none_eq_top, mul_top] },
by_cases b = 0; simp [*, some_eq_coe, le_div_iff_mul_le],
suffices : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ a * b ≤ 1, { simpa [div_eq_mul_inv, h] },
exact le_div_iff_mul_le (or.inl (mt coe_eq_coe.1 h)) (or.inl coe_ne_top)
end
lemma mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht,
norm_cast at *,
exact mul_inv_cancel h0
end
lemma inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
lemma mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ennreal} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : (r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b) :=
by rw [← @ennreal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁, one_mul]
lemma le_of_forall_nnreal_lt {x y : ennreal} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y :=
begin
refine le_of_forall_ge_of_dense (λ r hr, _),
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr,
exact h r hr
end
lemma eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le {x : ennreal} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x) : x = ∞ :=
top_unique $ le_of_forall_nnreal_lt $ λ r hr, h r
lemma div_add_div_same {a b c : ennreal} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
eq.symm $ right_distrib a b (c⁻¹)
lemma div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
mul_inv_cancel h0 hI
lemma mul_div_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : (b / a) * a = b :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel h0 hI, mul_one]
lemma mul_div_cancel' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel h0 hI]
lemma mul_div_le : a * (b / a) ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases h0 : a = 0, { simp [h0] },
by_cases hI : a = ∞, { simp [hI] },
rw mul_div_cancel' h0 hI, exact le_refl b
end
lemma inv_two_add_inv_two : (2:ennreal)⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1 :=
by rw [← two_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self two_ne_zero two_ne_top]
lemma add_halves (a : ennreal) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, inv_two_add_inv_two, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma div_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = ∞ :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ∞ :=
by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, not_or_distrib]
lemma half_pos {a : ennreal} (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
by simp [ne_of_gt h]
lemma one_half_lt_one : (2⁻¹:ennreal) < 1 := inv_lt_one.2 $ one_lt_two
lemma half_lt_self {a : ennreal} (hz : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a / 2 < a :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht,
have h : (2 : ennreal) = ((2 : ℝ≥0) : ennreal), from rfl,
have h' : (2 : ℝ≥0) ≠ 0, from _root_.two_ne_zero',
rw [h, ← coe_div h', coe_lt_coe], -- `norm_cast` fails to apply `coe_div`
norm_cast at hz,
exact nnreal.half_lt_self hz
end
lemma sub_half (h : a ≠ ∞) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h,
exact sub_eq_of_add_eq (mul_ne_top coe_ne_top $ by simp) (add_halves a)
end
lemma one_sub_inv_two : (1:ennreal) - 2⁻¹ = 2⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul] using sub_half one_ne_top
lemma exists_inv_nat_lt {a : ennreal} (h : a ≠ 0) :
∃n:ℕ, (n:ennreal)⁻¹ < a :=
@inv_inv a ▸ by simp only [inv_lt_inv, ennreal.exists_nat_gt (inv_ne_top.2 h)]
lemma exists_nat_pos_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
∃ n > 0, b < (n : ℕ) * a :=
begin
have : b / a ≠ ∞, from mul_ne_top hb (inv_ne_top.2 ha),
refine (ennreal.exists_nat_gt this).imp (λ n hn, _),
have : 0 < (n : ennreal), from (zero_le _).trans_lt hn,
refine ⟨coe_nat_lt_coe_nat.1 this, _⟩,
rwa [← ennreal.div_lt_iff (or.inl ha) (or.inr hb)]
end
lemma exists_nat_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
∃ n : ℕ, b < n * a :=
(exists_nat_pos_mul_gt ha hb).imp $ λ n, Exists.snd
lemma exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ n > 0, ((n : ℕ) : ennreal)⁻¹ * a < b :=
begin
rcases exists_nat_pos_mul_gt hb ha with ⟨n, npos, hn⟩,
have : (n : ennreal) ≠ 0 := nat.cast_ne_zero.2 npos.lt.ne',
use [n, npos],
rwa [← one_mul b, ← inv_mul_cancel this coe_nat_ne_top,
mul_assoc, mul_lt_mul_left (inv_ne_zero.2 coe_nat_ne_top) (inv_ne_top.2 this)]
end
lemma exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ n > 0, ↑(n : ℝ≥0) * a < b :=
begin
rcases exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt ha hb with ⟨n, npos : 0 < n, hn⟩,
use (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹,
simp [*, npos.ne', zero_lt_one]
end
end inv
section real
lemma to_real_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a+b).to_real = a.to_real + b.to_real :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
refl
end
lemma to_real_add_le : (a+b).to_real ≤ a.to_real + b.to_real :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, top_to_real, zero_add, to_real_nonneg]
else if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, top_to_real, add_zero, to_real_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (to_real_add ha hb)
lemma of_real_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ennreal.of_real (p + q) = ennreal.of_real p + ennreal.of_real q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ← coe_add,
coe_eq_coe, nnreal.of_real_add hp hq]
lemma of_real_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real (p + q) ≤ ennreal.of_real p + ennreal.of_real q :=
coe_le_coe.2 nnreal.of_real_add_le
@[simp] lemma to_real_le_to_real (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.to_real ≤ b.to_real ↔ a ≤ b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
norm_cast
end
@[simp] lemma to_real_lt_to_real (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.to_real < b.to_real ↔ a < b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
norm_cast
end
lemma to_real_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.to_real (max a b) = max (ennreal.to_real a) (ennreal.to_real b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(λ h, by simp only [h, (ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hr hp).2 h, max_eq_right])
(λ h, by simp only [h, (ennreal.to_real_le_to_real hp hr).2 h, max_eq_left])
lemma to_nnreal_pos_iff : 0 < a.to_nnreal ↔ (0 < a ∧ a ≠ ∞) :=
begin
cases a,
{ simp [none_eq_top] },
{ simp [some_eq_coe] }
end
lemma to_real_pos_iff : 0 < a.to_real ↔ (0 < a ∧ a ≠ ∞):=
(nnreal.coe_pos).trans to_nnreal_pos_iff
lemma of_real_le_of_real {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ennreal.of_real p ≤ ennreal.of_real q :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real, nnreal.of_real_le_of_real h]
lemma of_real_le_of_le_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ennreal} (h : a ≤ ennreal.to_real b) :
ennreal.of_real a ≤ b :=
(of_real_le_of_real h).trans of_real_to_real_le
@[simp] lemma of_real_le_of_real_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ennreal.of_real p ≤ ennreal.of_real q ↔ p ≤ q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_le_coe, nnreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff h]
@[simp] lemma of_real_lt_of_real_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ennreal.of_real p < ennreal.of_real q ↔ p < q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff h]
lemma of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real p < ennreal.of_real q ↔ p < q :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, coe_lt_coe, nnreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp] lemma of_real_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ennreal.of_real p ↔ 0 < p :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ennreal.of_real p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
by simp [ennreal.of_real]
lemma of_real_le_iff_le_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ennreal} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.of_real a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ennreal.to_real b :=
begin
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.of_real_le_iff_le_coe
end
lemma of_real_lt_iff_lt_to_real {a : ℝ} {b : ennreal} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ennreal.of_real a < b ↔ a < ennreal.to_real b :=
begin
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.of_real_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
end
lemma le_of_real_iff_to_real_le {a : ennreal} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ennreal.of_real b ↔ ennreal.to_real a ≤ b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.le_of_real_iff_coe_le hb
end
lemma to_real_le_of_le_of_real {a : ennreal} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ennreal.of_real b) :
ennreal.to_real a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞, from ne_top_of_le_ne_top of_real_ne_top h,
(le_of_real_iff_to_real_le ha hb).1 h
lemma lt_of_real_iff_to_real_lt {a : ennreal} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ennreal.of_real b ↔ ennreal.to_real a < b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha,
simpa [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.to_real] using nnreal.lt_of_real_iff_coe_lt
end
lemma of_real_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ennreal.of_real (p * q) = (ennreal.of_real p) * (ennreal.of_real q) :=
by { simp only [ennreal.of_real, coe_mul.symm, coe_eq_coe], exact nnreal.of_real_mul hp }
lemma of_real_inv_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
(ennreal.of_real x)⁻¹ = ennreal.of_real x⁻¹ :=
by rw [ennreal.of_real, ennreal.of_real, ←@coe_inv (nnreal.of_real x) (by simp [hx]), coe_eq_coe,
nnreal.of_real_inv.symm]
lemma of_real_div_of_pos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
ennreal.of_real (x / y) = ennreal.of_real x / ennreal.of_real y :=
by rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, of_real_mul (inv_nonneg.2 hy.le), of_real_inv_of_pos hy,
mul_comm]
lemma to_real_of_real_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ennreal) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ennreal.to_real ((ennreal.of_real c) * a) = c * ennreal.to_real a :=
begin
cases a,
{ simp only [none_eq_top, ennreal.to_real, top_to_nnreal, nnreal.coe_zero, mul_zero, mul_top],
by_cases h' : c ≤ 0,
{ rw [if_pos], { simp }, { convert of_real_zero, exact le_antisymm h' h } },
{ rw [if_neg], refl, rw [of_real_eq_zero], assumption } },
{ simp only [ennreal.to_real, ennreal.to_nnreal],
simp only [some_eq_coe, ennreal.of_real, coe_mul.symm, to_nnreal_coe, nnreal.coe_mul],
congr, apply nnreal.coe_of_real, exact h }
end
@[simp] lemma to_nnreal_mul_top (a : ennreal) : ennreal.to_nnreal (a * ∞) = 0 :=
begin
by_cases h : a = 0,
{ rw [h, zero_mul, zero_to_nnreal] },
{ rw [mul_top, if_neg h, top_to_nnreal] }
end
@[simp] lemma to_nnreal_top_mul (a : ennreal) : ennreal.to_nnreal (∞ * a) = 0 :=
by rw [mul_comm, to_nnreal_mul_top]
@[simp] lemma to_real_mul_top (a : ennreal) : ennreal.to_real (a * ∞) = 0 :=
by rw [ennreal.to_real, to_nnreal_mul_top, nnreal.coe_zero]
@[simp] lemma to_real_top_mul (a : ennreal) : ennreal.to_real (∞ * a) = 0 :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact to_real_mul_top _ }
lemma to_real_eq_to_real (ha : a < ∞) (hb : b < ∞) :
ennreal.to_real a = ennreal.to_real b ↔ a = b :=
begin
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.ne,
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb.ne,
simp only [coe_eq_coe, nnreal.coe_eq, coe_to_real],
end
/-- `ennreal.to_nnreal` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
def to_nnreal_hom : ennreal →* ℝ≥0 :=
{ to_fun := ennreal.to_nnreal,
map_one' := to_nnreal_coe,
map_mul' := by rintro (_|x) (_|y); simp only [← coe_mul, none_eq_top, some_eq_coe,
to_nnreal_top_mul, to_nnreal_mul_top, top_to_nnreal, mul_zero, zero_mul, to_nnreal_coe] }
lemma to_nnreal_mul {a b : ennreal}: (a * b).to_nnreal = a.to_nnreal * b.to_nnreal :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_mul a b
lemma to_nnreal_pow (a : ennreal) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).to_nnreal = a.to_nnreal ^ n :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_pow a n
lemma to_nnreal_prod {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ennreal} :
(∏ i in s, f i).to_nnreal = ∏ i in s, (f i).to_nnreal :=
to_nnreal_hom.map_prod _ _
/-- `ennreal.to_real` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
def to_real_hom : ennreal →* ℝ :=
(nnreal.to_real_hom : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ).comp to_nnreal_hom
lemma to_real_mul : (a * b).to_real = a.to_real * b.to_real :=
to_real_hom.map_mul a b
lemma to_real_pow (a : ennreal) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).to_real = a.to_real ^ n :=
to_real_hom.map_pow a n
lemma to_real_prod {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {f : ι → ennreal} :
(∏ i in s, f i).to_real = ∏ i in s, (f i).to_real :=
to_real_hom.map_prod _ _
lemma of_real_prod_of_nonneg {s : finset α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, i ∈ s → 0 ≤ f i) :
ennreal.of_real (∏ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, ennreal.of_real (f i) :=
begin
simp_rw [ennreal.of_real, ←coe_finset_prod, coe_eq_coe],
exact nnreal.of_real_prod_of_nonneg hf,
end
end real
section infi
variables {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ennreal}
lemma infi_add : infi f + a = ⨅i, f i + a :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, add_le_add (infi_le _ _) $ le_refl _)
(ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 $ le_infi $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ infi_le _ _)
lemma supr_sub : (⨆i, f i) - a = (⨆i, f i - a) :=
le_antisymm
(ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ supr_le $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 $ le_supr _ i)
(supr_le $ assume i, ennreal.sub_le_sub (le_supr _ _) (le_refl a))
lemma sub_infi : a - (⨅i, f i) = (⨆i, a - f i) :=
begin
refine (eq_of_forall_ge_iff $ λ c, _),
rw [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, add_comm, infi_add],
simp [ennreal.sub_le_iff_le_add, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm],
end
lemma Inf_add {s : set ennreal} : Inf s + a = ⨅b∈s, b + a :=
by simp [Inf_eq_infi, infi_add]
lemma add_infi {a : ennreal} : a + infi f = ⨅b, a + f b :=
by rw [add_comm, infi_add]; simp [add_comm]
lemma infi_add_infi (h : ∀i j, ∃k, f k + g k ≤ f i + g j) : infi f + infi g = (⨅a, f a + g a) :=
suffices (⨅a, f a + g a) ≤ infi f + infi g,
from le_antisymm (le_infi $ assume a, add_le_add (infi_le _ _) (infi_le _ _)) this,
calc (⨅a, f a + g a) ≤ (⨅ a a', f a + g a') :
le_infi $ assume a, le_infi $ assume a',
let ⟨k, h⟩ := h a a' in infi_le_of_le k h
... ≤ infi f + infi g :
by simp [add_infi, infi_add, -add_comm, -le_infi_iff]; exact le_refl _
lemma infi_sum {f : ι → α → ennreal} {s : finset α} [nonempty ι]
(h : ∀(t : finset α) (i j : ι), ∃k, ∀a∈t, f k a ≤ f i a ∧ f k a ≤ f j a) :
(⨅i, ∑ a in s, f i a) = ∑ a in s, ⨅i, f i a :=
finset.induction_on s (by simp) $ assume a s ha ih,
have ∀ (i j : ι), ∃ (k : ι), f k a + ∑ b in s, f k b ≤ f i a + ∑ b in s, f j b,
from assume i j,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h (insert a s) i j in
⟨k, add_le_add (hk a (finset.mem_insert_self _ _)).left $ finset.sum_le_sum $
assume a ha, (hk _ $ finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha).right⟩,
by simp [ha, ih.symm, infi_add_infi this]
lemma infi_mul {ι} [nonempty ι] {f : ι → ennreal} {x : ennreal} (h : x ≠ ∞) :
infi f * x = ⨅i, f i * x :=
begin
by_cases h2 : x = 0, simp only [h2, mul_zero, infi_const],
refine le_antisymm
(le_infi $ λ i, mul_right_mono $ infi_le _ _)
((div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h2) $ or.inl h).mp $ le_infi $
λ i, (div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inl h2) $ or.inl h).mpr $ infi_le _ _)
end
lemma mul_infi {ι} [nonempty ι] {f : ι → ennreal} {x : ennreal} (h : x ≠ ∞) :
x * infi f = ⨅i, x * f i :=
by { rw [mul_comm, infi_mul h], simp only [mul_comm], assumption }
/-! `supr_mul`, `mul_supr` and variants are in `topology.instances.ennreal`. -/
end infi
section supr
lemma supr_coe_nat : (⨆n:ℕ, (n : ennreal)) = ∞ :=
(supr_eq_top _).2 $ assume b hb, ennreal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 hb)
end supr
/-- `le_of_add_le_add_left` is normally applicable to `ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid`,
but it holds in `ennreal` with the additional assumption that `a < ∞`. -/
lemma le_of_add_le_add_left {a b c : ennreal} : a < ∞ →
a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c :=
by cases a; cases b; cases c; simp [← ennreal.coe_add, ennreal.coe_le_coe]
end ennreal
|
2c08e8d1787fee92c4c0fb0c801862ef3217a536 | b561a44b48979a98df50ade0789a21c79ee31288 | /stage0/src/Leanc.lean | 9f779335280e69c1b84958cfa51c89b13ac9939f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 3401ijk/lean4 | 97659c475ebd33a034fed515cb83a85f75ccfb06 | a5b1b8de4f4b038ff752b9e607b721f15a9a4351 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,933,007,651 | 1,636,424,845,000 | 1,636,424,845,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,175 | lean | def main (args : List String) : IO UInt32 := do
if args.isEmpty then
IO.println "Lean C compiler
A simple wrapper around a C compiler. Defaults to `@LEANC_CC@`,
which can be overridden with the environment variable `LEAN_CC`. All parameters are passed
as-is to the wrapped compiler.
Interesting options:
* `-U LEAN_MULTI_THREAD` can be used to optimize programs not making use of multi-threading
* `--print-cflags`: print C compiler flags necessary for building against the Lean runtime and exit
* `--print-ldlags`: print C compiler flags necessary for statically linking against the Lean library and exit
* Set the `LEANC_GMP` environment variable to a path to `libgmp.a` (or `-l:libgmp.a` on Linux) to link GMP statically.
Beware of the licensing consequences since GMP is LGPL."
return 1
let binDir ← IO.appDir
-- Zig gets confused by relative include paths on Windows
let binDir ← IO.FS.realPath binDir
let root := binDir.parent.get!
-- We assume that the CMake variables do not contain escaped spaces
let cflags := ["-I", (root / "include").toString] ++ "@LEANC_EXTRA_FLAGS@".trim.splitOn
let mut ldflags := ["-L", (root / "lib").toString, "-L", (root / "lib" / "lean").toString, (← IO.getEnv "LEANC_GMP").getD "-lgmp"] ++ "@LEAN_EXTRA_LINKER_FLAGS@".trim.splitOn
let mut ldflagsExt := "@LEANC_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS@".trim.splitOn
for arg in args do
match arg with
| "-shared" =>
-- switch to shared linker flags
ldflagsExt := "@LEANC_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS@".trim.splitOn
| "-c" =>
ldflags := []
ldflagsExt := []
| "--print-cflags" =>
IO.println <| " ".intercalate cflags
return 0
| "--print-ldflags" =>
IO.println <| " ".intercalate (cflags ++ ldflagsExt ++ ldflags)
return 0
| _ => ()
let mut cc := (← IO.getEnv "LEAN_CC").getD "@LEANC_CC@"
if cc.startsWith "." then
cc := (binDir / cc).toString
let args := cflags ++ args ++ ldflagsExt ++ ldflags ++ ["-Wno-unused-command-line-argument"]
if args.contains "-v" then
IO.eprintln s!"{cc} {" ".intercalate args}"
let child ← IO.Process.spawn { cmd := cc, args := args.toArray }
child.wait
|
3f303fdde919558174b025bb135bd76edcb97b55 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/algebra/support.lean | f37857437b9d03b294cdb80cad2a8b04bb6ee4ff | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,987 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import order.conditionally_complete_lattice
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import algebra.group.prod
import algebra.group.pi
import algebra.module.pi
/-!
# Support of a function
In this file we define `function.support f = {x | f x ≠ 0}` and prove its basic properties.
We also define `function.mul_support f = {x | f x ≠ 1}`.
-/
open set
open_locale big_operators
namespace function
variables {α β A B M N P R S G M₀ G₀ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section has_one
variables [has_one M] [has_one N] [has_one P]
/-- `support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 0`. -/
def support [has_zero A] (f : α → A) : set α := {x | f x ≠ 0}
/-- `mul_support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive] def mul_support (f : α → M) : set α := {x | f x ≠ 1}
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_eq_preimage (f : α → M) : mul_support f = f ⁻¹' {1}ᶜ := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma nmem_mul_support {f : α → M} {x : α} :
x ∉ mul_support f ↔ f x = 1 :=
not_not
@[to_additive] lemma compl_mul_support {f : α → M} :
(mul_support f)ᶜ = {x | f x = 1} :=
ext $ λ x, nmem_mul_support
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_mul_support {f : α → M} {x : α} :
x ∈ mul_support f ↔ f x ≠ 1 :=
iff.rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_subset_iff {f : α → M} {s : set α} :
mul_support f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 1 → x ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_subset_iff' {f : α → M} {s : set α} :
mul_support f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 1 :=
forall_congr $ λ x, not_imp_comm
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_eq_empty_iff {f : α → M} :
mul_support f = ∅ ↔ f = 1 :=
by { simp_rw [← subset_empty_iff, mul_support_subset_iff', funext_iff], simp }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_one' : mul_support (1 : α → M) = ∅ :=
mul_support_eq_empty_iff.2 rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_one : mul_support (λ x : α, (1 : M)) = ∅ :=
mul_support_one'
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_const {c : M} (hc : c ≠ 1) :
mul_support (λ x : α, c) = set.univ :=
by { ext x, simp [hc] }
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_binop_subset (op : M → N → P) (op1 : op 1 1 = 1)
(f : α → M) (g : α → N) :
mul_support (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
λ x hx, classical.by_cases
(λ hf : f x = 1, or.inr $ λ hg, hx $ by simp only [hf, hg, op1])
or.inl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_sup [semilattice_sup M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, f x ⊔ g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (⊔) sup_idem f g
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_inf [semilattice_inf M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, f x ⊓ g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (⊓) inf_idem f g
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_max [linear_order M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_sup f g
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_min [linear_order M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_inf f g
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_supr [conditionally_complete_lattice M] [nonempty ι]
(f : ι → α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, ⨆ i, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i, mul_support (f i) :=
begin
rw mul_support_subset_iff',
simp only [mem_Union, not_exists, nmem_mul_support],
intros x hx,
simp only [hx, csupr_const]
end
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_infi [conditionally_complete_lattice M] [nonempty ι]
(f : ι → α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, ⨅ i, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i, mul_support (f i) :=
@mul_support_supr _ (order_dual M) ι ⟨(1:M)⟩ _ _ f
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_comp_subset {g : M → N} (hg : g 1 = 1) (f : α → M) :
mul_support (g ∘ f) ⊆ mul_support f :=
λ x, mt $ λ h, by simp only [(∘), *]
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_subset_comp {g : M → N} (hg : ∀ {x}, g x = 1 → x = 1)
(f : α → M) :
mul_support f ⊆ mul_support (g ∘ f) :=
λ x, mt hg
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_comp_eq (g : M → N) (hg : ∀ {x}, g x = 1 ↔ x = 1)
(f : α → M) :
mul_support (g ∘ f) = mul_support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr hg
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_comp_eq_preimage (g : β → M) (f : α → β) :
mul_support (g ∘ f) = f ⁻¹' mul_support g :=
rfl
@[to_additive support_prod_mk] lemma mul_support_prod_mk (f : α → M) (g : α → N) :
mul_support (λ x, (f x, g x)) = mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mul_support, not_and_distrib, mem_union_eq, mem_set_of_eq,
prod.mk_eq_one, ne.def]
@[to_additive support_prod_mk'] lemma mul_support_prod_mk' (f : α → M × N) :
mul_support f = mul_support (λ x, (f x).1) ∪ mul_support (λ x, (f x).2) :=
by simp only [← mul_support_prod_mk, prod.mk.eta]
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_along_fiber_subset (f : α × β → M) (a : α) :
mul_support (λ b, f (a, b)) ⊆ (mul_support f).image prod.snd :=
by tidy
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_along_fiber_finite_of_finite
(f : α × β → M) (a : α) (h : (mul_support f).finite) :
(mul_support (λ b, f (a, b))).finite :=
(h.image prod.snd).subset (mul_support_along_fiber_subset f a)
end has_one
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_mul [monoid M] (f g : α → M) :
mul_support (λ x, f x * g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (*) (one_mul _) f g
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_inv [group G] (f : α → G) :
mul_support (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) = mul_support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr inv_eq_one
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_support_inv' [group G] (f : α → G) :
mul_support (f⁻¹) = mul_support f :=
mul_support_inv f
@[simp] lemma mul_support_inv₀ [group_with_zero G₀] (f : α → G₀) :
mul_support (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) = mul_support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr inv_eq_one₀
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_mul_inv [group G] (f g : α → G) :
mul_support (λ x, f x * (g x)⁻¹) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (λ a b, a * b⁻¹) (by simp) f g
@[to_additive support_sub] lemma mul_support_group_div [group G] (f g : α → G) :
mul_support (λ x, f x / g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (/) (by simp only [one_div, one_inv]) f g
lemma mul_support_div [group_with_zero G₀] (f g : α → G₀) :
mul_support (λ x, f x / g x) ⊆ mul_support f ∪ mul_support g :=
mul_support_binop_subset (/) (by simp only [div_one]) f g
@[simp] lemma support_mul [mul_zero_class R] [no_zero_divisors R] (f g : α → R) :
support (λ x, f x * g x) = support f ∩ support g :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_support, mul_ne_zero_iff, mem_inter_eq, not_or_distrib]
lemma support_smul_subset_right [add_monoid A] [monoid B] [distrib_mul_action B A]
(b : B) (f : α → A) :
support (b • f) ⊆ support f :=
λ x hbf hf, hbf $ by rw [pi.smul_apply, hf, smul_zero]
lemma support_smul_subset_left [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
(f : α → R) (g : α → M) :
support (f • g) ⊆ support f :=
λ x hfg hf, hfg $ by rw [pi.smul_apply', hf, zero_smul]
lemma support_smul [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
[no_zero_smul_divisors R M] (f : α → R) (g : α → M) :
support (f • g) = support f ∩ support g :=
ext $ λ x, smul_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma support_inv [group_with_zero G₀] (f : α → G₀) :
support (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr inv_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma support_div [group_with_zero G₀] (f g : α → G₀) :
support (λ x, f x / g x) = support f ∩ support g :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive] lemma mul_support_prod [comm_monoid M] (s : finset α) (f : α → β → M) :
mul_support (λ x, ∏ i in s, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ s, mul_support (f i) :=
begin
rw mul_support_subset_iff',
simp only [mem_Union, not_exists, nmem_mul_support],
exact λ x, finset.prod_eq_one
end
lemma support_prod_subset [comm_monoid_with_zero A] (s : finset α) (f : α → β → A) :
support (λ x, ∏ i in s, f i x) ⊆ ⋂ i ∈ s, support (f i) :=
λ x hx, mem_bInter_iff.2 $ λ i hi H, hx $ finset.prod_eq_zero hi H
lemma support_prod [comm_monoid_with_zero A] [no_zero_divisors A] [nontrivial A]
(s : finset α) (f : α → β → A) :
support (λ x, ∏ i in s, f i x) = ⋂ i ∈ s, support (f i) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by
simp only [support, ne.def, finset.prod_eq_zero_iff, mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_Inter, not_exists]
lemma mul_support_one_add [has_one R] [add_left_cancel_monoid R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (λ x, 1 + f x) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr add_right_eq_self
lemma mul_support_one_add' [has_one R] [add_left_cancel_monoid R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (1 + f) = support f :=
mul_support_one_add f
lemma mul_support_add_one [has_one R] [add_right_cancel_monoid R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (λ x, f x + 1) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr add_left_eq_self
lemma mul_support_add_one' [has_one R] [add_right_cancel_monoid R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (f + 1) = support f :=
mul_support_add_one f
lemma mul_support_one_sub' [has_one R] [add_group R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (1 - f) = support f :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_support_one_add', support_neg']
lemma mul_support_one_sub [has_one R] [add_group R] (f : α → R) :
mul_support (λ x, 1 - f x) = support f :=
mul_support_one_sub' f
end function
namespace set
open function
variables {α β M : Type*} [has_one M] {f : α → M}
@[to_additive] lemma image_inter_mul_support_eq {s : set β} {g : β → α} :
(g '' s ∩ mul_support f) = g '' (s ∩ mul_support (f ∘ g)) :=
by rw [mul_support_comp_eq_preimage f g, image_inter_preimage]
end set
namespace pi
variables {A : Type*} {B : Type*} [decidable_eq A] [has_zero B] {a : A} {b : B}
lemma support_single_zero : function.support (pi.single a (0 : B)) = ∅ := by simp
@[simp] lemma support_single_of_ne (h : b ≠ 0) :
function.support (pi.single a b) = {a} :=
begin
ext,
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, ne.def, function.mem_support],
split,
{ contrapose!,
exact λ h', single_eq_of_ne h' b },
{ rintro rfl,
rw single_eq_same,
exact h }
end
lemma support_single [decidable_eq B] :
function.support (pi.single a b) = if b = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by { split_ifs with h; simp [h] }
lemma support_single_subset : function.support (pi.single a b) ⊆ {a} :=
begin
classical,
rw support_single,
split_ifs; simp
end
lemma support_single_disjoint {b' : B} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hb' : b' ≠ 0) {i j : A} :
disjoint (function.support (single i b)) (function.support (single j b')) ↔ i ≠ j :=
by rw [support_single_of_ne hb, support_single_of_ne hb', disjoint_singleton]
end pi
|
60e7e6f261898cafb042256cd879a146b4255359 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/measure_theory/function/special_functions.lean | 8aa2b24be303dd07b03be391f7242043b50d55fb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,321 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.special_functions.pow
import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.arctan
import analysis.inner_product_space.basic
import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space
/-!
# Measurability of real and complex functions
We show that most standard real and complex functions are measurable, notably `exp`, `cos`, `sin`,
`cosh`, `sinh`, `log`, `pow`, `arcsin`, `arccos`, `arctan`, and scalar products.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale nnreal ennreal
namespace real
@[measurability] lemma measurable_exp : measurable exp := continuous_exp.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_log : measurable log :=
measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton 0 $ continuous.measurable $
continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuous_on_log
@[measurability] lemma measurable_sin : measurable sin := continuous_sin.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_cos : measurable cos := continuous_cos.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_sinh : measurable sinh := continuous_sinh.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_cosh : measurable cosh := continuous_cosh.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_arcsin : measurable arcsin := continuous_arcsin.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_arccos : measurable arccos := continuous_arccos.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_arctan : measurable arctan := continuous_arctan.measurable
end real
namespace complex
@[measurability] lemma measurable_re : measurable re := continuous_re.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_im : measurable im := continuous_im.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_of_real : measurable (coe : ℝ → ℂ) :=
continuous_of_real.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_exp : measurable exp := continuous_exp.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_sin : measurable sin := continuous_sin.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_cos : measurable cos := continuous_cos.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_sinh : measurable sinh := continuous_sinh.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_cosh : measurable cosh := continuous_cosh.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_arg : measurable arg :=
have A : measurable (λ x : ℂ, real.arcsin (x.im / x.abs)),
from real.measurable_arcsin.comp (measurable_im.div measurable_norm),
have B : measurable (λ x : ℂ, real.arcsin ((-x).im / x.abs)),
from real.measurable_arcsin.comp ((measurable_im.comp measurable_neg).div measurable_norm),
measurable.ite (is_closed_le continuous_const continuous_re).measurable_set A $
measurable.ite (is_closed_le continuous_const continuous_im).measurable_set
(B.add_const _) (B.sub_const _)
@[measurability] lemma measurable_log : measurable log :=
(measurable_of_real.comp $ real.measurable_log.comp measurable_norm).add $
(measurable_of_real.comp measurable_arg).mul_const I
end complex
namespace is_R_or_C
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜]
@[measurability] lemma measurable_re : measurable (re : 𝕜 → ℝ) := continuous_re.measurable
@[measurability] lemma measurable_im : measurable (im : 𝕜 → ℝ) := continuous_im.measurable
end is_R_or_C
section real_composition
open real
variables {α : Type*} {m : measurable_space α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : measurable f)
@[measurability] lemma measurable.exp : measurable (λ x, real.exp (f x)) :=
real.measurable_exp.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.log : measurable (λ x, log (f x)) :=
measurable_log.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.cos : measurable (λ x, real.cos (f x)) :=
real.measurable_cos.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.sin : measurable (λ x, real.sin (f x)) :=
real.measurable_sin.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.cosh : measurable (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) :=
real.measurable_cosh.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.sinh : measurable (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) :=
real.measurable_sinh.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.arctan : measurable (λ x, arctan (f x)) :=
measurable_arctan.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.sqrt : measurable (λ x, sqrt (f x)) :=
continuous_sqrt.measurable.comp hf
end real_composition
section complex_composition
open complex
variables {α : Type*} {m : measurable_space α} {f : α → ℂ} (hf : measurable f)
@[measurability] lemma measurable.cexp : measurable (λ x, complex.exp (f x)) :=
complex.measurable_exp.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.ccos : measurable (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) :=
complex.measurable_cos.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.csin : measurable (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) :=
complex.measurable_sin.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.ccosh : measurable (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) :=
complex.measurable_cosh.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.csinh : measurable (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) :=
complex.measurable_sinh.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.carg : measurable (λ x, arg (f x)) :=
measurable_arg.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.clog : measurable (λ x, log (f x)) :=
measurable_log.comp hf
end complex_composition
section is_R_or_C_composition
variables {α 𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] {m : measurable_space α}
{f : α → 𝕜} {μ : measure_theory.measure α}
include m
@[measurability] lemma measurable.re (hf : measurable f) : measurable (λ x, is_R_or_C.re (f x)) :=
is_R_or_C.measurable_re.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma ae_measurable.re (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, is_R_or_C.re (f x)) μ :=
is_R_or_C.measurable_re.comp_ae_measurable hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.im (hf : measurable f) : measurable (λ x, is_R_or_C.im (f x)) :=
is_R_or_C.measurable_im.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma ae_measurable.im (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, is_R_or_C.im (f x)) μ :=
is_R_or_C.measurable_im.comp_ae_measurable hf
omit m
end is_R_or_C_composition
section
variables {α 𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] [measurable_space α]
{f : α → 𝕜} {μ : measure_theory.measure α}
@[measurability] lemma is_R_or_C.measurable_of_real : measurable (coe : ℝ → 𝕜) :=
is_R_or_C.continuous_of_real.measurable
lemma measurable_of_re_im
(hre : measurable (λ x, is_R_or_C.re (f x)))
(him : measurable (λ x, is_R_or_C.im (f x))) : measurable f :=
begin
convert (is_R_or_C.measurable_of_real.comp hre).add
((is_R_or_C.measurable_of_real.comp him).mul_const is_R_or_C.I),
{ ext1 x,
exact (is_R_or_C.re_add_im _).symm },
all_goals { apply_instance },
end
lemma ae_measurable_of_re_im
(hre : ae_measurable (λ x, is_R_or_C.re (f x)) μ)
(him : ae_measurable (λ x, is_R_or_C.im (f x)) μ) : ae_measurable f μ :=
begin
convert (is_R_or_C.measurable_of_real.comp_ae_measurable hre).add
((is_R_or_C.measurable_of_real.comp_ae_measurable him).mul_const is_R_or_C.I),
{ ext1 x,
exact (is_R_or_C.re_add_im _).symm },
all_goals { apply_instance },
end
end
section pow_instances
instance complex.has_measurable_pow : has_measurable_pow ℂ ℂ :=
⟨measurable.ite (measurable_fst (measurable_set_singleton 0))
(measurable.ite (measurable_snd (measurable_set_singleton 0)) measurable_one measurable_zero)
(measurable_fst.clog.mul measurable_snd).cexp⟩
instance real.has_measurable_pow : has_measurable_pow ℝ ℝ :=
⟨complex.measurable_re.comp $ ((complex.measurable_of_real.comp measurable_fst).pow
(complex.measurable_of_real.comp measurable_snd))⟩
instance nnreal.has_measurable_pow : has_measurable_pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨(measurable_fst.coe_nnreal_real.pow measurable_snd).subtype_mk⟩
instance ennreal.has_measurable_pow : has_measurable_pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
begin
refine ⟨ennreal.measurable_of_measurable_nnreal_prod _ _⟩,
{ simp_rw ennreal.coe_rpow_def,
refine measurable.ite _ measurable_const
(measurable_fst.pow measurable_snd).coe_nnreal_ennreal,
exact measurable_set.inter (measurable_fst (measurable_set_singleton 0))
(measurable_snd measurable_set_Iio), },
{ simp_rw ennreal.top_rpow_def,
refine measurable.ite measurable_set_Ioi measurable_const _,
exact measurable.ite (measurable_set_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const, },
end
end pow_instances
section
variables {α : Type*} {𝕜 : Type*} {E : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] [inner_product_space 𝕜 E]
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.inner {m : measurable_space α} [measurable_space E] [opens_measurable_space E]
[topological_space.second_countable_topology E]
{f g : α → E} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ t, ⟪f t, g t⟫) :=
continuous.measurable2 continuous_inner hf hg
@[measurability]
lemma ae_measurable.inner {m : measurable_space α} [measurable_space E] [opens_measurable_space E]
[topological_space.second_countable_topology E]
{μ : measure_theory.measure α} {f g : α → E} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_measurable g μ) :
ae_measurable (λ x, ⟪f x, g x⟫) μ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x, ⟪hf.mk f x, hg.mk g x⟫, hf.measurable_mk.inner hg.measurable_mk, _⟩,
refine hf.ae_eq_mk.mp (hg.ae_eq_mk.mono (λ x hxg hxf, _)),
dsimp only,
congr,
exacts [hxf, hxg],
end
end
|
2a5a4af1f3e45f33f1e6e5ccc922625712d49c3e | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/unzip_error.lean | 785a7772ff68b364f04d2404f5b91fe468137887 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 406 | lean | import data.examples.vector
open nat vector prod
variables {A B : Type}
definition unzip : Π {n : nat}, vector (A × B) n → vector A n × vector B n
| unzip nil := (nil, nil)
| unzip ((a, b) :: v) :=
match unzip v with -- ERROR
(va, vb) := (a :: va, b :: vb)
end
example : unzip ((1, 20) :: (2, 30) :: nil) = ((1 :: 2 :: nil, 20 :: 30 :: nil) : vector nat 2 × vector nat 2) :=
rfl
|
74b47c60df484a37ab8a237cf4f1df520d4e8a03 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/linear_algebra/tensor_algebra/basic.lean | 7ba9ed22644cd7ce4317dac1f977c15b570fe406 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,118 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import algebra.free_algebra
import algebra.ring_quot
import algebra.triv_sq_zero_ext
import algebra.algebra.operations
import linear_algebra.multilinear.basic
/-!
# Tensor Algebras
Given a commutative semiring `R`, and an `R`-module `M`, we construct the tensor algebra of `M`.
This is the free `R`-algebra generated (`R`-linearly) by the module `M`.
## Notation
1. `tensor_algebra R M` is the tensor algebra itself. It is endowed with an R-algebra structure.
2. `tensor_algebra.ι R` is the canonical R-linear map `M → tensor_algebra R M`.
3. Given a linear map `f : M → A` to an R-algebra `A`, `lift R f` is the lift of `f` to an
`R`-algebra morphism `tensor_algebra R M → A`.
## Theorems
1. `ι_comp_lift` states that the composition `(lift R f) ∘ (ι R)` is identical to `f`.
2. `lift_unique` states that whenever an R-algebra morphism `g : tensor_algebra R M → A` is
given whose composition with `ι R` is `f`, then one has `g = lift R f`.
3. `hom_ext` is a variant of `lift_unique` in the form of an extensionality theorem.
4. `lift_comp_ι` is a combination of `ι_comp_lift` and `lift_unique`. It states that the lift
of the composition of an algebra morphism with `ι` is the algebra morphism itself.
## Implementation details
As noted above, the tensor algebra of `M` is constructed as the free `R`-algebra generated by `M`,
modulo the additional relations making the inclusion of `M` into an `R`-linear map.
-/
variables (R : Type*) [comm_semiring R]
variables (M : Type*) [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
namespace tensor_algebra
/--
An inductively defined relation on `pre R M` used to force the initial algebra structure on
the associated quotient.
-/
inductive rel : free_algebra R M → free_algebra R M → Prop
-- force `ι` to be linear
| add {a b : M} :
rel (free_algebra.ι R (a+b)) (free_algebra.ι R a + free_algebra.ι R b)
| smul {r : R} {a : M} :
rel (free_algebra.ι R (r • a)) (algebra_map R (free_algebra R M) r * free_algebra.ι R a)
end tensor_algebra
/--
The tensor algebra of the module `M` over the commutative semiring `R`.
-/
@[derive [inhabited, semiring, algebra R]]
def tensor_algebra := ring_quot (tensor_algebra.rel R M)
namespace tensor_algebra
instance {S : Type*} [comm_ring S] [module S M] : ring (tensor_algebra S M) :=
ring_quot.ring (rel S M)
variables {M}
/--
The canonical linear map `M →ₗ[R] tensor_algebra R M`.
-/
def ι : M →ₗ[R] (tensor_algebra R M) :=
{ to_fun := λ m, (ring_quot.mk_alg_hom R _ (free_algebra.ι R m)),
map_add' := λ x y, by { rw [←alg_hom.map_add], exact ring_quot.mk_alg_hom_rel R rel.add, },
map_smul' := λ r x, by { rw [←alg_hom.map_smul], exact ring_quot.mk_alg_hom_rel R rel.smul, } }
lemma ring_quot_mk_alg_hom_free_algebra_ι_eq_ι (m : M) :
ring_quot.mk_alg_hom R (rel R M) (free_algebra.ι R m) = ι R m := rfl
/--
Given a linear map `f : M → A` where `A` is an `R`-algebra, `lift R f` is the unique lift
of `f` to a morphism of `R`-algebras `tensor_algebra R M → A`.
-/
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A] : (M →ₗ[R] A) ≃ (tensor_algebra R M →ₐ[R] A) :=
{ to_fun := ring_quot.lift_alg_hom R ∘ λ f,
⟨free_algebra.lift R ⇑f, λ x y (h : rel R M x y), by induction h; simp [algebra.smul_def]⟩,
inv_fun := λ F, F.to_linear_map.comp (ι R),
left_inv := λ f, linear_map.ext $ λ x,
(ring_quot.lift_alg_hom_mk_alg_hom_apply _ _ _ _).trans (free_algebra.lift_ι_apply f x),
right_inv := λ F, ring_quot.ring_quot_ext' _ _ _ $ free_algebra.hom_ext $ funext $ λ x,
(ring_quot.lift_alg_hom_mk_alg_hom_apply _ _ _ _).trans (free_algebra.lift_ι_apply _ _) }
variables {R}
@[simp]
theorem ι_comp_lift {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A] (f : M →ₗ[R] A) :
(lift R f).to_linear_map.comp (ι R) = f := (lift R).symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
theorem lift_ι_apply {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A] (f : M →ₗ[R] A) (x) :
lift R f (ι R x) = f x := by { dsimp [lift, ι], refl, }
@[simp]
theorem lift_unique {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A] (f : M →ₗ[R] A)
(g : tensor_algebra R M →ₐ[R] A) : g.to_linear_map.comp (ι R) = f ↔ g = lift R f :=
(lift R).symm_apply_eq
-- Marking `tensor_algebra` irreducible makes `ring` instances inaccessible on quotients.
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/algebra.2Esemiring_to_ring.20breaks.20semimodule.20typeclass.20lookup/near/212580241
-- For now, we avoid this by not marking it irreducible.
attribute [irreducible] ι lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_ι {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A] (g : tensor_algebra R M →ₐ[R] A) :
lift R (g.to_linear_map.comp (ι R)) = g :=
by { rw ←lift_symm_apply, exact (lift R).apply_symm_apply g }
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {A : Type*} [semiring A] [algebra R A] {f g : tensor_algebra R M →ₐ[R] A}
(w : f.to_linear_map.comp (ι R) = g.to_linear_map.comp (ι R)) : f = g :=
begin
rw [←lift_symm_apply, ←lift_symm_apply] at w,
exact (lift R).symm.injective w,
end
/-- If `C` holds for the `algebra_map` of `r : R` into `tensor_algebra R M`, the `ι` of `x : M`,
and is preserved under addition and muliplication, then it holds for all of `tensor_algebra R M`.
-/
-- This proof closely follows `free_algebra.induction`
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction {C : tensor_algebra R M → Prop}
(h_grade0 : ∀ r, C (algebra_map R (tensor_algebra R M) r))
(h_grade1 : ∀ x, C (ι R x))
(h_mul : ∀ a b, C a → C b → C (a * b))
(h_add : ∀ a b, C a → C b → C (a + b))
(a : tensor_algebra R M) :
C a :=
begin
-- the arguments are enough to construct a subalgebra, and a mapping into it from M
let s : subalgebra R (tensor_algebra R M) :=
{ carrier := C,
mul_mem' := h_mul,
add_mem' := h_add,
algebra_map_mem' := h_grade0, },
let of : M →ₗ[R] s := (ι R).cod_restrict s.to_submodule h_grade1,
-- the mapping through the subalgebra is the identity
have of_id : alg_hom.id R (tensor_algebra R M) = s.val.comp (lift R of),
{ ext,
simp [of], },
-- finding a proof is finding an element of the subalgebra
convert subtype.prop (lift R of a),
exact alg_hom.congr_fun of_id a,
end
/-- The left-inverse of `algebra_map`. -/
def algebra_map_inv : tensor_algebra R M →ₐ[R] R :=
lift R (0 : M →ₗ[R] R)
variables (M)
lemma algebra_map_left_inverse :
function.left_inverse algebra_map_inv (algebra_map R $ tensor_algebra R M) :=
λ x, by simp [algebra_map_inv]
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_inj (x y : R) :
algebra_map R (tensor_algebra R M) x = algebra_map R (tensor_algebra R M) y ↔ x = y :=
(algebra_map_left_inverse M).injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_eq_zero_iff (x : R) : algebra_map R (tensor_algebra R M) x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff (algebra_map _ _) (algebra_map_left_inverse _).injective
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_eq_one_iff (x : R) : algebra_map R (tensor_algebra R M) x = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
map_eq_one_iff (algebra_map _ _) (algebra_map_left_inverse _).injective
variables {M}
/-- The canonical map from `tensor_algebra R M` into `triv_sq_zero_ext R M` that sends
`tensor_algebra.ι` to `triv_sq_zero_ext.inr`. -/
def to_triv_sq_zero_ext : tensor_algebra R M →ₐ[R] triv_sq_zero_ext R M :=
lift R (triv_sq_zero_ext.inr_hom R M)
@[simp] lemma to_triv_sq_zero_ext_ι (x : M) :
to_triv_sq_zero_ext (ι R x) = triv_sq_zero_ext.inr x :=
lift_ι_apply _ _
/-- The left-inverse of `ι`.
As an implementation detail, we implement this using `triv_sq_zero_ext` which has a suitable
algebra structure. -/
def ι_inv : tensor_algebra R M →ₗ[R] M :=
(triv_sq_zero_ext.snd_hom R M).comp to_triv_sq_zero_ext.to_linear_map
lemma ι_left_inverse : function.left_inverse ι_inv (ι R : M → tensor_algebra R M) :=
λ x, by simp [ι_inv]
variables (R)
@[simp] lemma ι_inj (x y : M) : ι R x = ι R y ↔ x = y :=
ι_left_inverse.injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma ι_eq_zero_iff (x : M) : ι R x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
by rw [←ι_inj R x 0, linear_map.map_zero]
variables {R}
@[simp] lemma ι_eq_algebra_map_iff (x : M) (r : R) : ι R x = algebra_map R _ r ↔ x = 0 ∧ r = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, _⟩,
{ have hf0 : to_triv_sq_zero_ext (ι R x) = (0, x), from lift_ι_apply _ _,
rw [h, alg_hom.commutes] at hf0,
have : r = 0 ∧ 0 = x := prod.ext_iff.1 hf0,
exact this.symm.imp_left eq.symm, },
{ rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
rw [linear_map.map_zero, ring_hom.map_zero] }
end
@[simp] lemma ι_ne_one [nontrivial R] (x : M) : ι R x ≠ 1 :=
begin
rw [←(algebra_map R (tensor_algebra R M)).map_one, ne.def, ι_eq_algebra_map_iff],
exact one_ne_zero ∘ and.right,
end
/-- The generators of the tensor algebra are disjoint from its scalars. -/
lemma ι_range_disjoint_one : disjoint (linear_map.range (ι R : M →ₗ[R] tensor_algebra R M))
(1 : submodule R (tensor_algebra R M)) :=
begin
rw submodule.disjoint_def,
rintros _ ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨r, (rfl : algebra_map _ _ _ = _)⟩,
rw ι_eq_algebra_map_iff x at hx,
rw [hx.2, ring_hom.map_zero]
end
variables (R M)
/-- Construct a product of `n` elements of the module within the tensor algebra.
See also `pi_tensor_product.tprod`. -/
def tprod (n : ℕ) : multilinear_map R (λ i : fin n, M) (tensor_algebra R M) :=
(multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin R n (tensor_algebra R M)).comp_linear_map $ λ _, ι R
@[simp] lemma tprod_apply {n : ℕ} (x : fin n → M) :
tprod R M n x = (list.of_fn (λ i, ι R (x i))).prod := rfl
variables {R M}
end tensor_algebra
namespace free_algebra
variables {R M}
/-- The canonical image of the `free_algebra` in the `tensor_algebra`, which maps
`free_algebra.ι R x` to `tensor_algebra.ι R x`. -/
def to_tensor : free_algebra R M →ₐ[R] tensor_algebra R M :=
free_algebra.lift R (tensor_algebra.ι R)
@[simp] lemma to_tensor_ι (m : M) : (free_algebra.ι R m).to_tensor = tensor_algebra.ι R m :=
by simp [to_tensor]
end free_algebra
|
952eb049b5b769d362af2beaed1ff5b3556a7ec5 | 5ae26df177f810c5006841e9c73dc56e01b978d7 | /src/linear_algebra/dimension.lean | f2464942b88356f46f5ccac20da6f5c676275d1e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/mathlib | 98322577c460bc6b1fe5c21f42ce33ad1c3e5558 | a2a867e827c2a6702beb9efc2b9282bd801d5f9a | refs/heads/master | 1,583,848,251,477 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 129,409,993 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,565,164,817,000 | 1,523,628,059,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,188 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen
Dimension of modules and vector spaces.
-/
import linear_algebra.basis
import set_theory.ordinal
noncomputable theory
universes u u' u'' v v' w w'
variables {α : Type u} {β γ δ ε : Type v}
variables {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u''} {φ : η → Type u'}
-- TODO: relax these universe constraints
section vector_space
variables [decidable_eq ι] [decidable_eq ι'] [discrete_field α] [add_comm_group β] [vector_space α β]
include α
open submodule lattice function set
variables (α β)
def vector_space.dim : cardinal :=
cardinal.min
(nonempty_subtype.2 (@exists_is_basis α β _ (classical.dec_eq _) _ _ _))
(λ b, cardinal.mk b.1)
variables {α β}
open vector_space
section
set_option class.instance_max_depth 50
theorem is_basis.le_span (zero_ne_one : (0 : α) ≠ 1) [decidable_eq β] {v : ι → β} {J : set β} (hv : is_basis α v)
(hJ : span α J = ⊤) : cardinal.mk (range v) ≤ cardinal.mk J :=
begin
cases le_or_lt cardinal.omega (cardinal.mk J) with oJ oJ,
{ have := cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_inj (linear_independent.injective zero_ne_one hv.1),
let S : J → set ι := λ j, (is_basis.repr hv j).support.to_set,
let S' : J → set β := λ j, v '' S j,
have hs : range v ⊆ ⋃ j, S' j,
{ intros b hb,
rcases mem_range.1 hb with ⟨i, hi⟩,
have : span α J ≤ comap hv.repr (finsupp.supported α α (⋃ j, S j)) :=
span_le.2 (λ j hj x hx, ⟨_, ⟨⟨j, hj⟩, rfl⟩, hx⟩),
rw hJ at this,
replace : hv.repr (v i) ∈ (finsupp.supported α α (⋃ j, S j)) := this trivial,
rw [hv.repr_eq_single, finsupp.mem_supported, finsupp.support_single_ne_zero zero_ne_one.symm] at this,
rw ← hi,
apply mem_Union.2,
rcases mem_Union.1 (this (mem_singleton _)) with ⟨j, hj⟩,
use j,
rw mem_image,
use i,
exact ⟨hj, rfl⟩ },
refine le_of_not_lt (λ IJ, _),
suffices : cardinal.mk (⋃ j, S' j) < cardinal.mk (range v),
{ exact not_le_of_lt this ⟨set.embedding_of_subset hs⟩ },
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans cardinal.mk_Union_le_sum_mk
(cardinal.sum_le_sum _ (λ _, cardinal.omega) _)) _,
{ exact λ j, le_of_lt (cardinal.lt_omega_iff_finite.2 $ finite_image _ (finset.finite_to_set _)) },
{ rwa [cardinal.sum_const, cardinal.mul_eq_max oJ (le_refl _), max_eq_left oJ] } },
{ rcases exists_finite_card_le_of_finite_of_linear_independent_of_span
(cardinal.lt_omega_iff_finite.1 oJ) hv.1.to_subtype_range _ with ⟨fI, hi⟩,
{ rwa [← cardinal.nat_cast_le, cardinal.finset_card, finset.coe_to_finset,
cardinal.finset_card, finset.coe_to_finset] at hi, },
{ rw hJ, apply set.subset_univ } },
end
end
/-- dimension theorem -/
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_basis [decidable_eq β] {v : ι → β} {v' : ι' → β}
(hv : is_basis α v) (hv' : is_basis α v') :
cardinal.lift.{w w'} (cardinal.mk ι) = cardinal.lift.{w' w} (cardinal.mk ι') :=
begin
rw ←cardinal.lift_inj.{(max w w') v},
rw [cardinal.lift_lift, cardinal.lift_lift],
apply le_antisymm,
{ convert cardinal.lift_le.{v (max w w')}.2 (hv.le_span zero_ne_one hv'.2),
{ rw cardinal.lift_max.{w v w'},
apply (cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_inj (hv.injective zero_ne_one)).symm, },
{ rw cardinal.lift_max.{w' v w},
apply (cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_inj (hv'.injective zero_ne_one)).symm, }, },
{ convert cardinal.lift_le.{v (max w w')}.2 (hv'.le_span zero_ne_one hv.2),
{ rw cardinal.lift_max.{w' v w},
apply (cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_inj (hv'.injective zero_ne_one)).symm, },
{ rw cardinal.lift_max.{w v w'},
apply (cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_inj (hv.injective zero_ne_one)).symm, }, }
end
theorem is_basis.mk_range_eq_dim [decidable_eq β] {v : ι → β} (h : is_basis α v) :
cardinal.mk (range v) = dim α β :=
begin
have := show ∃ v', dim α β = _, from cardinal.min_eq _ _,
rcases this with ⟨v', e⟩,
rw e,
apply cardinal.lift_inj.1,
rw cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_inj (h.injective zero_ne_one),
convert @mk_eq_mk_of_basis _ _ _ _ _ (id _) _ _ _ (id _) _ _ h v'.property
end
theorem is_basis.mk_eq_dim [decidable_eq β] {v : ι → β} (h : is_basis α v) :
cardinal.lift.{w v} (cardinal.mk ι) = cardinal.lift.{v w} (dim α β) :=
by rw [←h.mk_range_eq_dim, cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_inj (h.injective zero_ne_one)]
variables [add_comm_group γ] [vector_space α γ]
theorem linear_equiv.dim_eq (f : β ≃ₗ[α] γ) :
dim α β = dim α γ :=
by letI := classical.dec_eq β;
letI := classical.dec_eq γ; exact
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_is_basis α β in
cardinal.lift_inj.1 $ hb.mk_eq_dim.symm.trans (f.is_basis hb).mk_eq_dim
@[simp] lemma dim_bot : dim α (⊥ : submodule α β) = 0 :=
by letI := classical.dec_eq β;
rw [← cardinal.lift_inj, ← (@is_basis_empty_bot pempty α β _ _ _ _ _ _ nonempty_pempty).mk_eq_dim,
cardinal.mk_pempty]
@[simp] lemma dim_top : dim α (⊤ : submodule α β) = dim α β :=
linear_equiv.dim_eq (linear_equiv.of_top _ rfl)
lemma dim_of_field (α : Type*) [discrete_field α] : dim α α = 1 :=
by rw [←cardinal.lift_inj, ← (@is_basis_singleton_one punit _ α _ _ _).mk_eq_dim, cardinal.mk_punit]
lemma dim_span [decidable_eq β] {v : ι → β} (hv : linear_independent α v) :
dim α ↥(span α (range v)) = cardinal.mk (range v) :=
by rw [←cardinal.lift_inj, ← (is_basis_span hv).mk_eq_dim,
cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_inj (@linear_independent.injective ι α β v _ _ _ _ _ _ zero_ne_one hv)]
lemma dim_span_set [decidable_eq β] {s : set β} (hs : linear_independent α (λ x, x : s → β)) :
dim α ↥(span α s) = cardinal.mk s :=
by rw [← @set_of_mem_eq _ s, ← subtype.val_range]; exact dim_span hs
lemma dim_span_le (s : set β) : dim α (span α s) ≤ cardinal.mk s :=
begin
classical,
rcases
exists_linear_independent linear_independent_empty (set.empty_subset s)
with ⟨b, hb, _, hsb, hlib⟩,
have hsab : span α s = span α b,
from span_eq_of_le _ hsb (span_le.2 (λ x hx, subset_span (hb hx))),
convert cardinal.mk_le_mk_of_subset hb,
rw [hsab, dim_span_set hlib]
end
lemma dim_span_of_finset (s : finset β) :
dim α (span α (↑s : set β)) < cardinal.omega :=
calc dim α (span α (↑s : set β)) ≤ cardinal.mk (↑s : set β) : dim_span_le ↑s
... = s.card : by rw ←cardinal.finset_card
... < cardinal.omega : cardinal.nat_lt_omega _
theorem dim_prod : dim α (β × γ) = dim α β + dim α γ :=
begin
letI := classical.dec_eq β,
letI := classical.dec_eq γ,
rcases exists_is_basis α β with ⟨b, hb⟩,
rcases exists_is_basis α γ with ⟨c, hc⟩,
rw [← cardinal.lift_inj,
← @is_basis.mk_eq_dim α (β × γ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (is_basis_inl_union_inr hb hc),
cardinal.lift_add, cardinal.lift_mk,
← hb.mk_eq_dim, ← hc.mk_eq_dim,
cardinal.lift_mk, cardinal.lift_mk,
cardinal.add_def (ulift b) (ulift c)],
exact cardinal.lift_inj.1 (cardinal.lift_mk_eq.2
⟨equiv.ulift.trans (equiv.sum_congr (@equiv.ulift b) (@equiv.ulift c)).symm ⟩),
end
theorem dim_quotient (p : submodule α β) [decidable_eq p.quotient]:
dim α p.quotient + dim α p = dim α β :=
by classical; exact let ⟨f⟩ := quotient_prod_linear_equiv p in dim_prod.symm.trans f.dim_eq
/-- rank-nullity theorem -/
theorem dim_range_add_dim_ker (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) : dim α f.range + dim α f.ker = dim α β :=
begin
haveI := λ (p : submodule α β), classical.dec_eq p.quotient,
rw [← f.quot_ker_equiv_range.dim_eq, dim_quotient]
end
lemma dim_range_le (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) : dim α f.range ≤ dim α β :=
by rw ← dim_range_add_dim_ker f; exact le_add_right (le_refl _)
lemma dim_map_le (f : β →ₗ γ) (p : submodule α β) : dim α (p.map f) ≤ dim α p :=
begin
have h := dim_range_le (f.comp (submodule.subtype p)),
rwa [linear_map.range_comp, range_subtype] at h,
end
lemma dim_range_of_surjective (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) (h : surjective f) : dim α f.range = dim α γ :=
begin
refine linear_equiv.dim_eq (linear_equiv.of_bijective (submodule.subtype _) _ _),
exact linear_map.ker_eq_bot.2 subtype.val_injective,
rwa [range_subtype, linear_map.range_eq_top]
end
lemma dim_eq_surjective (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) (h : surjective f) : dim α β = dim α γ + dim α f.ker :=
by rw [← dim_range_add_dim_ker f, ← dim_range_of_surjective f h]
lemma dim_le_surjective (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) (h : surjective f) : dim α γ ≤ dim α β :=
by rw [dim_eq_surjective f h]; refine le_add_right (le_refl _)
lemma dim_eq_injective (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) (h : injective f) : dim α β = dim α f.range :=
by rw [← dim_range_add_dim_ker f, linear_map.ker_eq_bot.2 h]; simp [dim_bot]
set_option class.instance_max_depth 37
lemma dim_submodule_le (s : submodule α β) : dim α s ≤ dim α β :=
begin
letI := classical.dec_eq β,
rcases exists_is_basis α s with ⟨bs, hbs⟩,
have : linear_independent α (λ (i : bs), submodule.subtype s i.val) :=
(linear_independent.image hbs.1) (linear_map.disjoint_ker'.2
(λ _ _ _ _ h, subtype.val_injective h)),
rcases exists_subset_is_basis (this.to_subtype_range) with ⟨b, hbs_b, hb⟩,
rw [←cardinal.lift_le, ← is_basis.mk_eq_dim hbs, ← is_basis.mk_eq_dim hb, cardinal.lift_le],
have : subtype.val '' bs ⊆ b,
{ convert hbs_b,
rw [@range_comp _ _ _ (λ (i : bs), (i.val)) (submodule.subtype s),
←image_univ, submodule.subtype],
simp only [subtype.val_image_univ],
refl },
calc cardinal.mk ↥bs = cardinal.mk ((subtype.val : s → β) '' bs) :
(cardinal.mk_image_eq $ subtype.val_injective).symm
... ≤ cardinal.mk ↥b :
nonempty.intro (embedding_of_subset this),
end
set_option class.instance_max_depth 32
lemma dim_le_injective (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) (h : injective f) :
dim α β ≤ dim α γ :=
by rw [dim_eq_injective f h]; exact dim_submodule_le _
lemma dim_le_of_submodule (s t : submodule α β) (h : s ≤ t) : dim α s ≤ dim α t :=
dim_le_injective (of_le h) $ assume ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ eq,
subtype.eq $ show x = y, from subtype.ext.1 eq
section
variables [add_comm_group δ] [vector_space α δ]
variables [add_comm_group ε] [vector_space α ε]
set_option class.instance_max_depth 70
open linear_map
/-- This is mostly an auxiliary lemma for `dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq` -/
lemma dim_add_dim_split
(db : δ →ₗ[α] β) (eb : ε →ₗ[α] β) (cd : γ →ₗ[α] δ) (ce : γ →ₗ[α] ε)
(hde : ⊤ ≤ db.range ⊔ eb.range)
(hgd : ker cd = ⊥)
(eq : db.comp cd = eb.comp ce)
(eq₂ : ∀d e, db d = eb e → (∃c, cd c = d ∧ ce c = e)) :
dim α β + dim α γ = dim α δ + dim α ε :=
have hf : surjective (copair db eb),
begin
refine (range_eq_top.1 $ top_unique $ _),
rwa [← map_top, ← prod_top, map_copair_prod]
end,
begin
conv {to_rhs, rw [← dim_prod, dim_eq_surjective _ hf] },
congr' 1,
apply linear_equiv.dim_eq,
fapply linear_equiv.of_bijective,
{ refine cod_restrict _ (pair cd (- ce)) _,
{ assume c,
simp [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg],
exact linear_map.ext_iff.1 eq c } },
{ rw [ker_cod_restrict, ker_pair, hgd, bot_inf_eq] },
{ rw [eq_top_iff, range_cod_restrict, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, map_top, range_subtype],
rintros ⟨d, e⟩,
have h := eq₂ d (-e),
simp [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at ⊢ h,
assume hde,
rcases h hde with ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩,
refine ⟨c, h₁, _⟩,
rw [h₂, _root_.neg_neg] }
end
lemma dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq (s t : submodule α β) :
dim α (s ⊔ t : submodule α β) + dim α (s ⊓ t : submodule α β) = dim α s + dim α t :=
dim_add_dim_split (of_le le_sup_left) (of_le le_sup_right) (of_le inf_le_left) (of_le inf_le_right)
begin
rw [← map_le_map_iff (ker_subtype $ s ⊔ t), map_sup, map_top,
← linear_map.range_comp, ← linear_map.range_comp, subtype_comp_of_le, subtype_comp_of_le,
range_subtype, range_subtype, range_subtype],
exact le_refl _
end
(ker_of_le _ _ _)
begin ext ⟨x, hx⟩, refl end
begin
rintros ⟨b₁, hb₁⟩ ⟨b₂, hb₂⟩ eq,
have : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg subtype.val eq,
subst this,
exact ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁, hb₂⟩, rfl, rfl⟩
end
lemma dim_add_le_dim_add_dim (s t : submodule α β) :
dim α (s ⊔ t : submodule α β) ≤ dim α s + dim α t :=
by rw [← dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq]; exact le_add_right (le_refl _)
end
section fintype
variable [fintype η]
variables [∀i, add_comm_group (φ i)] [∀i, vector_space α (φ i)]
open linear_map
lemma dim_pi : vector_space.dim α (Πi, φ i) = cardinal.sum (λi, vector_space.dim α (φ i)) :=
begin
letI := λ i, classical.dec_eq (φ i),
choose b hb using assume i, exists_is_basis α (φ i),
haveI := classical.dec_eq η,
have : is_basis α (λ (ji : Σ j, b j), std_basis α (λ j, φ j) ji.fst ji.snd.val),
by apply pi.is_basis_std_basis _ hb,
rw [←cardinal.lift_inj, ← this.mk_eq_dim],
simp [λ i, (hb i).mk_range_eq_dim.symm, cardinal.sum_mk]
end
lemma dim_fun {β η : Type u} [fintype η] [add_comm_group β] [vector_space α β] :
vector_space.dim α (η → β) = fintype.card η * vector_space.dim α β :=
by rw [dim_pi, cardinal.sum_const, cardinal.fintype_card]
lemma dim_fun_eq_lift_mul :
vector_space.dim α (η → β) = (fintype.card η : cardinal.{max u'' v}) *
cardinal.lift.{v u''} (vector_space.dim α β) :=
by rw [dim_pi, cardinal.sum_const_eq_lift_mul, cardinal.fintype_card, cardinal.lift_nat_cast]
lemma dim_fun' : vector_space.dim α (η → α) = fintype.card η :=
by rw [dim_fun_eq_lift_mul, dim_of_field α, cardinal.lift_one, mul_one, cardinal.nat_cast_inj]
lemma dim_fin_fun (n : ℕ) : dim α (fin n → α) = n :=
by simp [dim_fun']
end fintype
lemma exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot {s : submodule α β} (h : s ≠ ⊥) : ∃ b : β, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
begin
classical,
by_contradiction hex,
have : ∀x∈s, (x:β) = 0, { simpa only [not_exists, not_and, not_not, ne.def] using hex },
exact (h $ bot_unique $ assume s hs, (submodule.mem_bot α).2 $ this s hs)
end
lemma exists_mem_ne_zero_of_dim_pos {s : submodule α β} (h : vector_space.dim α s > 0) :
∃ b : β, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot $ assume eq, by rw [(>), eq, dim_bot] at h; exact lt_irrefl _ h
lemma exists_is_basis_fintype [decidable_eq β] (h : dim α β < cardinal.omega) :
∃ s : (set β), (is_basis α (subtype.val : s → β)) ∧ nonempty (fintype s) :=
begin
cases exists_is_basis α β with s hs,
rw [←cardinal.lift_lt, ← is_basis.mk_eq_dim hs, cardinal.lift_lt,
cardinal.lt_omega_iff_fintype] at h,
exact ⟨s, hs, h⟩
end
section rank
def rank (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) : cardinal := dim α f.range
lemma rank_le_domain (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) : rank f ≤ dim α β :=
by rw [← dim_range_add_dim_ker f]; exact le_add_right (le_refl _)
lemma rank_le_range (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) : rank f ≤ dim α γ :=
dim_submodule_le _
lemma rank_add_le (f g : β →ₗ[α] γ) : rank (f + g) ≤ rank f + rank g :=
calc rank (f + g) ≤ dim α (f.range ⊔ g.range : submodule α γ) :
begin
refine dim_le_of_submodule _ _ _,
exact (linear_map.range_le_iff_comap.2 $ eq_top_iff'.2 $
assume x, show f x + g x ∈ (f.range ⊔ g.range : submodule α γ), from
mem_sup.2 ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _), _, mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _), rfl⟩)
end
... ≤ rank f + rank g : dim_add_le_dim_add_dim _ _
@[simp] lemma rank_zero : rank (0 : β →ₗ[α] γ) = 0 :=
by rw [rank, linear_map.range_zero, dim_bot]
lemma rank_finset_sum_le {η} (s : finset η) (f : η → β →ₗ[α] γ) :
rank (s.sum f) ≤ s.sum (λ d, rank (f d)) :=
@finset.sum_hom_rel _ _ _ _ _ (λa b, rank a ≤ b) f (λ d, rank (f d)) s (le_of_eq rank_zero)
(λ i g c h, le_trans (rank_add_le _ _) (add_le_add_left' h))
variables [add_comm_group δ] [vector_space α δ]
lemma rank_comp_le1 (g : β →ₗ[α] γ) (f : γ →ₗ[α] δ) : rank (f.comp g) ≤ rank f :=
begin
refine dim_le_of_submodule _ _ _,
rw [linear_map.range_comp],
exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
end
lemma rank_comp_le2 (g : β →ₗ[α] γ) (f : γ →ₗ δ) : rank (f.comp g) ≤ rank g :=
by rw [rank, rank, linear_map.range_comp]; exact dim_map_le _ _
end rank
end vector_space
section unconstrained_universes
variables {γ' : Type v'}
variables [discrete_field α] [add_comm_group β] [vector_space α β]
[add_comm_group γ'] [vector_space α γ']
open vector_space
/-- Version of linear_equiv.dim_eq without universe constraints. -/
theorem linear_equiv.dim_eq_lift [decidable_eq β] [decidable_eq γ'] (f : β ≃ₗ[α] γ') :
cardinal.lift.{v v'} (dim α β) = cardinal.lift.{v' v} (dim α γ') :=
begin
cases exists_is_basis α β with b hb,
rw [← cardinal.lift_inj.1 hb.mk_eq_dim, ← (f.is_basis hb).mk_eq_dim, cardinal.lift_mk],
end
end unconstrained_universes
|
faab3147a919335e8ded2f0f6194972b8e76f8df | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/bracket.lean | f081f02f9187e2593497fd5b4e372781329a266d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,627 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Lutz, Oliver Nash
-/
/-!
# Bracket Notation
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/480
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file provides notation which can be used for the Lie bracket, for the commutator of two
subgroups, and for other similar operations.
## Main Definitions
* `has_bracket L M` for a binary operation that takes something in `L` and something in `M` and
produces something in `M`. Defining an instance of this structure gives access to the notation `⁅ ⁆`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `⁅x, y⁆` for the `bracket` of any `has_bracket` structure. Note that
these are the Unicode "square with quill" brackets rather than the usual square brackets.
-/
/-- The has_bracket class has three intended uses:
1. for certain binary operations on structures, like the product `⁅x, y⁆` of two elements
`x`, `y` in a Lie algebra or the commutator of two elements `x` and `y` in a group.
2. for certain actions of one structure on another, like the action `⁅x, m⁆` of an element `x`
of a Lie algebra on an element `m` in one of its modules (analogous to `has_smul` in the
associative setting).
3. for binary operations on substructures, like the commutator `⁅H, K⁆` of two subgroups `H` and
`K` of a group. -/
class has_bracket (L M : Type*) := (bracket : L → M → M)
notation `⁅`x`, `y`⁆` := has_bracket.bracket x y
|
0a8fd0280e6a365a764d2c3797ee74ca8fb53b32 | 1b8f093752ba748c5ca0083afef2959aaa7dace5 | /src/category_theory/products/bifunctors.lean | f83f2f7001dbe27895be9145659f125929d18be4 | [] | no_license | khoek/lean-category-theory | 7ec4cda9cc64a5a4ffeb84712ac7d020dbbba386 | 63dcb598e9270a3e8b56d1769eb4f825a177cd95 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,251,725,759 | 1,539,344,445,000 | 1,539,344,445,000 | 145,281,070 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,534,662,376,000 | 1,534,662,376,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,186 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
import category_theory.products
import category_theory.tactics.obviously
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.ProductCategory
universes u₁ v₁ u₂ v₂ u₃ v₃
variable {C : Type u₁}
variable [𝒞 : category.{u₁ v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂}
variable [𝒟 : category.{u₂ v₂} D]
variable {E : Type u₃}
variable [ℰ : category.{u₃ v₃} E]
include 𝒞 𝒟 ℰ
@[simp] lemma Bifunctor_identities (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (X : C) (Y : D)
: @category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X, Y) (𝟙 X, 𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 (F (X, Y))
:= F.map_id (X, Y)
@[simp] lemma Bifunctor_left_identity (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (W : C) {X Y Z : D} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
: @category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (W, X) (W, Z) (𝟙 W, f ≫ g) =
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (W, X) (W, Y) (𝟙 W, f)) ≫ (@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (W, Y) (W, Z) (𝟙 W, g)) := by obviously
@[simp] lemma Bifunctor_right_identity (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (X Y Z : C) (W : D) (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
: @category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, W) (Z, W) (f ≫ g, 𝟙 W) =
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, W) (Y, W) (f, 𝟙 W)) ≫ (@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (Y, W) (Z, W) (g, 𝟙 W)) := by obviously
@[simp] lemma Bifunctor_diagonal_identities_1 (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (X X' : C) (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Y' : D) (g : Y ⟶ Y')
: (@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X, Y') (𝟙 X, g)) ≫ (@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y') (X', Y') (f, 𝟙 Y')) =
@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X', Y') (f, g) := by obviously
@[simp] lemma Bifunctor_diagonal_identities_2 (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (X X' : C) (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Y' : D) (g : Y ⟶ Y')
: (@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X', Y) (f, 𝟙 Y)) ≫ (@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X', Y) (X', Y') (𝟙 X', g)) =
@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X', Y') (f, g) := by obviously
end category_theory.ProductCategory
|
25404dd0c6aaf2dd72f8d25ecef2359b638331bf | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/data/nat/basic.lean | a7be9ca61dd1999898c2fdbb0466c44fc0917670 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62,174 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.ordered_ring
import algebra.order_functions
import init_.data.nat.lemmas
/-!
# Basic operations on the natural numbers
This files has some basic lemmas about natural numbers, definition of the `choice` function,
and extra recursors:
* `le_rec_on`, `le_induction`: recursion and induction principles starting at non-zero numbers.
* `decreasing_induction` : recursion growing downwards.
* `strong_rec'` : recursion based on strong inequalities.
-/
universes u v
instance : canonically_ordered_comm_semiring ℕ :=
{ le_iff_exists_add := assume a b,
⟨assume h, let ⟨c, hc⟩ := nat.le.dest h in ⟨c, hc.symm⟩,
assume ⟨c, hc⟩, hc.symm ▸ nat.le_add_right _ _⟩,
zero_ne_one := ne_of_lt zero_lt_one,
mul_eq_zero_iff := assume a b,
iff.intro nat.eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (by simp [or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt}),
bot := 0,
bot_le := nat.zero_le,
.. (infer_instance : ordered_add_comm_monoid ℕ),
.. (infer_instance : linear_ordered_semiring ℕ),
.. (infer_instance : comm_semiring ℕ) }
namespace nat
variables {m n k : ℕ}
-- Sometimes a bare `nat.add` or similar appears as a consequence of unfolding
-- during pattern matching. These lemmas package them back up as typeclass
-- mediated operations.
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b : ℕ} : nat.add a b = a + b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b : ℕ} : nat.mul a b = a * b := rfl
attribute [simp] nat.add_sub_cancel nat.add_sub_cancel_left
attribute [simp] nat.sub_self
@[simp] lemma succ_pos' {n : ℕ} : 0 < succ n := succ_pos n
theorem succ_inj' {n m : ℕ} : succ n = succ m ↔ n = m :=
⟨succ_inj, congr_arg _⟩
theorem succ_le_succ_iff {m n : ℕ} : succ m ≤ succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ⟩
lemma zero_max {m : nat} : max 0 m = m :=
max_eq_right (zero_le _)
theorem max_succ_succ {m n : ℕ} :
max (succ m) (succ n) = succ (max m n) :=
begin
by_cases h1 : m ≤ n,
rw [max_eq_right h1, max_eq_right (succ_le_succ h1)],
{ rw not_le at h1, have h2 := le_of_lt h1,
rw [max_eq_left h2, max_eq_left (succ_le_succ h2)] }
end
lemma not_succ_lt_self {n : ℕ} : ¬succ n < n :=
not_lt_of_ge (nat.le_succ _)
theorem lt_succ_iff {m n : ℕ} : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
succ_le_succ_iff
lemma succ_le_iff {m n : ℕ} : succ m ≤ n ↔ m < n :=
⟨lt_of_succ_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma lt_iff_add_one_le {m n : ℕ} : m < n ↔ m + 1 ≤ n :=
by rw succ_le_iff
-- Just a restatement of `nat.lt_succ_iff` using `+1`.
lemma lt_add_one_iff {a b : ℕ} : a < b + 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
lt_succ_iff
-- A flipped version of `lt_add_one_iff`.
lemma lt_one_add_iff {a b : ℕ} : a < 1 + b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by simp only [add_comm, lt_succ_iff]
-- This is true reflexively, by the definition of `≤` on ℕ,
-- but it's still useful to have, to convince Lean to change the syntactic type.
lemma add_one_le_iff {a b : ℕ} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
iff.refl _
lemma one_add_le_iff {a b : ℕ} : 1 + a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
by simp only [add_comm, add_one_le_iff]
theorem of_le_succ {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m.succ) : n ≤ m ∨ n = m.succ :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le H).imp le_of_lt_succ id
/-- Recursion starting at a non-zero number: given a map `C k → C (k+1)` for each `k`,
there is a map from `C n` to each `C m`, `n ≤ m`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def le_rec_on {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n : ℕ} : Π {m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → (Π {k}, C k → C (k+1)) → C n → C m
| 0 H next x := eq.rec_on (eq_zero_of_le_zero H) x
| (m+1) H next x := or.by_cases (of_le_succ H) (λ h : n ≤ m, next $ le_rec_on h @next x) (λ h : n = m + 1, eq.rec_on h x)
theorem le_rec_on_self {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n} {h : n ≤ n} {next} (x : C n) : (le_rec_on h next x : C n) = x :=
by cases n; unfold le_rec_on or.by_cases; rw [dif_neg n.not_succ_le_self, dif_pos rfl]
theorem le_rec_on_succ {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (h1 : n ≤ m) {h2 : n ≤ m+1} {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h2 @next x : C (m+1)) = next (le_rec_on h1 @next x : C m) :=
by conv { to_lhs, rw [le_rec_on, or.by_cases, dif_pos h1] }
theorem le_rec_on_succ' {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n} {h : n ≤ n+1} {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h next x : C (n+1)) = next x :=
by rw [le_rec_on_succ (le_refl n), le_rec_on_self]
theorem le_rec_on_trans {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m k} (hnm : n ≤ m) (hmk : m ≤ k) {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on (le_trans hnm hmk) @next x : C k) = le_rec_on hmk @next (le_rec_on hnm @next x) :=
begin
induction hmk with k hmk ih, { rw le_rec_on_self },
rw [le_rec_on_succ (le_trans hnm hmk), ih, le_rec_on_succ]
end
theorem le_rec_on_succ_left {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (h1 : n ≤ m) (h2 : n+1 ≤ m)
{next : Π{{k}}, C k → C (k+1)} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h2 next (next x) : C m) = (le_rec_on h1 next x : C m) :=
begin
rw [subsingleton.elim h1 (le_trans (le_succ n) h2),
le_rec_on_trans (le_succ n) h2, le_rec_on_succ']
end
theorem le_rec_on_injective {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (hnm : n ≤ m)
(next : Π n, C n → C (n+1)) (Hnext : ∀ n, function.injective (next n)) :
function.injective (le_rec_on hnm next) :=
begin
induction hnm with m hnm ih, { intros x y H, rwa [le_rec_on_self, le_rec_on_self] at H },
intros x y H, rw [le_rec_on_succ hnm, le_rec_on_succ hnm] at H, exact ih (Hnext _ H)
end
theorem le_rec_on_surjective {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (hnm : n ≤ m)
(next : Π n, C n → C (n+1)) (Hnext : ∀ n, function.surjective (next n)) :
function.surjective (le_rec_on hnm next) :=
begin
induction hnm with m hnm ih, { intros x, use x, rw le_rec_on_self },
intros x, rcases Hnext _ x with ⟨w, rfl⟩, rcases ih w with ⟨x, rfl⟩, use x, rw le_rec_on_succ
end
theorem pred_eq_of_eq_succ {m n : ℕ} (H : m = n.succ) : m.pred = n := by simp [H]
@[simp] lemma pred_eq_succ_iff {n m : ℕ} : pred n = succ m ↔ n = m + 2 :=
by cases n; split; rintro ⟨⟩; refl
theorem pred_sub (n m : ℕ) : pred n - m = pred (n - m) :=
by rw [← sub_one, nat.sub_sub, one_add]; refl
@[simp]
lemma add_succ_sub_one (n m : ℕ) : (n + succ m) - 1 = n + m :=
by rw [add_succ, succ_sub_one]
@[simp]
lemma succ_add_sub_one (n m : ℕ) : (succ n + m) - 1 = n + m :=
by rw [succ_add, succ_sub_one]
lemma pred_eq_sub_one (n : ℕ) : pred n = n - 1 := rfl
lemma one_le_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : 1 ≤ m :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h
lemma le_pred_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) : m ≤ n - 1 :=
nat.sub_le_sub_right h 1
lemma le_of_pred_lt {m n : ℕ} : pred m < n → m ≤ n :=
match m with
| 0 := le_of_lt
| m+1 := id
end
/-- This ensures that `simp` succeeds on `pred (n + 1) = n`. -/
@[simp] lemma pred_one_add (n : ℕ) : pred (1 + n) = n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_one, pred_succ]
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero : 0 < n ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨ne_of_gt, nat.pos_of_ne_zero⟩
lemma one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 1 < n ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ n ≠ 1
| 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 := dec_trivial
| (n+2) := dec_trivial
theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt {a b : ℕ} (h1 : a < b + 1) (h2 : ¬ a < b) : a = b :=
have h3 : a ≤ b, from le_of_lt_succ h1,
or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_not_lt h2) (λ h, h) (λ h, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge h3))
protected theorem le_sub_add (n m : ℕ) : n ≤ n - m + m :=
or.elim (le_total n m)
(assume : n ≤ m, begin rw [sub_eq_zero_of_le this, zero_add], exact this end)
(assume : m ≤ n, begin rw (nat.sub_add_cancel this) end)
theorem sub_add_eq_max (n m : ℕ) : n - m + m = max n m :=
eq_max (nat.le_sub_add _ _) (le_add_left _ _) $ λ k h₁ h₂,
by rw ← nat.sub_add_cancel h₂; exact
add_le_add_right (nat.sub_le_sub_right h₁ _) _
theorem add_sub_eq_max (n m : ℕ) : n + (m - n) = max n m :=
by rw [add_comm, max_comm, sub_add_eq_max]
theorem sub_add_min (n m : ℕ) : n - m + min n m = n :=
(le_total n m).elim
(λ h, by rw [min_eq_left h, sub_eq_zero_of_le h, zero_add])
(λ h, by rw [min_eq_right h, nat.sub_add_cancel h])
protected theorem add_sub_cancel' {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : m + (n - m) = n :=
by rw [add_comm, nat.sub_add_cancel h]
protected theorem sub_eq_of_eq_add (h : k = m + n) : k - m = n :=
begin rw [h, nat.add_sub_cancel_left] end
theorem sub_cancel {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : a ≤ c) (w : b - a = c - a) : b = c :=
by rw [←nat.sub_add_cancel h₁, ←nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, w]
lemma sub_sub_sub_cancel_right {a b c : ℕ} (h₂ : c ≤ b) : (a - c) - (b - c) = a - b :=
by rw [nat.sub_sub, ←nat.add_sub_assoc h₂, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
lemma add_sub_cancel_right (n m k : ℕ) : n + (m + k) - k = n + m :=
by { rw [nat.add_sub_assoc, nat.add_sub_cancel], apply k.le_add_left }
protected lemma sub_add_eq_add_sub {a b c : ℕ} (h : b ≤ a) : (a - b) + c = (a + c) - b :=
by rw [add_comm a, nat.add_sub_assoc h, add_comm]
theorem sub_min (n m : ℕ) : n - min n m = n - m :=
nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add $ by rw [add_comm, sub_add_min]
theorem sub_sub_assoc {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : b ≤ a) (h₂ : c ≤ b) : a - (b - c) = a - b + c :=
(nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (le_trans (nat.sub_le _ _) h₁)).2 $
by rw [add_right_comm, add_assoc, nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, nat.sub_add_cancel h₁]
protected theorem lt_of_sub_pos (h : 0 < n - m) : m < n :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume : n ≤ m,
have n - m = 0, from sub_eq_zero_of_le this,
begin rw this at h, exact lt_irrefl _ h end)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right : m - k < n - k → m < n :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h, nat.sub_le_sub_right h _)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_left : m - n < m - k → k < n :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (nat.sub_le_sub_left _)
protected theorem sub_lt_self (h₁ : 0 < m) (h₂ : 0 < n) : m - n < m :=
calc
m - n = succ (pred m) - succ (pred n) : by rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁, succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₂]
... = pred m - pred n : by rw succ_sub_succ
... ≤ pred m : sub_le _ _
... < succ (pred m) : lt_succ_self _
... = m : succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁
protected theorem le_sub_right_of_add_le (h : m + k ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
by rw ← nat.add_sub_cancel m k; exact nat.sub_le_sub_right h k
protected theorem le_sub_left_of_add_le (h : k + m ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le (by rwa add_comm at h)
protected theorem lt_sub_right_of_add_lt (h : m + k < n) : m < n - k :=
lt_of_succ_le $ nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le $
by rw succ_add; exact succ_le_of_lt h
protected theorem lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (h : k + m < n) : m < n - k :=
nat.lt_sub_right_of_add_lt (by rwa add_comm at h)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_right (h : m < n - k) : m + k < n :=
@nat.lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right _ _ k (by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_left (h : m < n - k) : k + m < n :=
by rw add_comm; exact nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right h
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_le_right : n - k ≤ m → n ≤ m + k :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.lt_sub_right_of_add_lt
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_le_left : n - k ≤ m → n ≤ k + m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_right : n - k < m → n < m + k :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_left : n - k < m → n < k + m :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le
protected theorem sub_le_left_of_le_add : n ≤ k + m → n - k ≤ m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left
protected theorem sub_le_right_of_le_add : n ≤ m + k → n - k ≤ m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right
protected theorem sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add (H : n ≤ k) : k - n < m ↔ k < n + m :=
⟨nat.lt_add_of_sub_lt_left,
λ h₁,
have succ k ≤ n + m, from succ_le_of_lt h₁,
have succ (k - n) ≤ m, from
calc succ (k - n) = succ k - n : by rw (succ_sub H)
... ≤ n + m - n : nat.sub_le_sub_right this n
... = m : by rw nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
lt_of_succ_le this⟩
protected theorem le_sub_left_iff_add_le (H : m ≤ k) : n ≤ k - m ↔ m + n ≤ k :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add H)
protected theorem le_sub_right_iff_add_le (H : n ≤ k) : m ≤ k - n ↔ m + n ≤ k :=
by rw [nat.le_sub_left_iff_add_le H, add_comm]
protected theorem lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt : n < k - m ↔ m + n < k :=
⟨nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left, nat.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt⟩
protected theorem lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt : m < k - n ↔ m + n < k :=
by rw [nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt, add_comm]
theorem sub_le_left_iff_le_add : m - n ≤ k ↔ m ≤ n + k :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt
theorem sub_le_right_iff_le_add : m - k ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n + k :=
by rw [nat.sub_le_left_iff_le_add, add_comm]
protected theorem sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add (H : k ≤ m) : m - k < n ↔ m < n + k :=
by rw [nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add H, add_comm]
protected theorem sub_le_sub_left_iff (H : k ≤ m) : m - n ≤ m - k ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h,
have k + (m - k) - n ≤ m - k, by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel' H,
nat.le_of_add_le_add_right (nat.le_add_of_sub_le_left this),
nat.sub_le_sub_left _⟩
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_right_iff (H : k ≤ m) : m - k < n - k ↔ m < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff _ _ _ H)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_left_iff (H : n ≤ m) : m - n < m - k ↔ k < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (nat.sub_le_sub_left_iff H)
protected theorem sub_le_iff : m - n ≤ k ↔ m - k ≤ n :=
nat.sub_le_left_iff_le_add.trans nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add.symm
protected lemma sub_le_self (n m : ℕ) : n - m ≤ n :=
nat.sub_le_left_of_le_add (nat.le_add_left _ _)
protected theorem sub_lt_iff (h₁ : n ≤ m) (h₂ : k ≤ m) : m - n < k ↔ m - k < n :=
(nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add h₁).trans (nat.sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add h₂).symm
lemma pred_le_iff {n m : ℕ} : pred n ≤ m ↔ n ≤ succ m :=
@nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add n m 1
lemma lt_pred_iff {n m : ℕ} : n < pred m ↔ succ n < m :=
@nat.lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt n 1 m
lemma lt_of_lt_pred {a b : ℕ} (h : a < b - 1) : a < b :=
lt_of_succ_lt (lt_pred_iff.1 h)
protected theorem mul_ne_zero {n m : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) (m0 : m ≠ 0) : n * m ≠ 0
| nm := (eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero nm).elim n0 m0
@[simp] protected theorem mul_eq_zero {a b : ℕ} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
iff.intro eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (by simp [or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt})
@[simp] protected theorem zero_eq_mul {a b : ℕ} : 0 = a * b ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
by rw [eq_comm, nat.mul_eq_zero]
lemma eq_zero_of_double_le {a : ℕ} (h : 2 * a ≤ a) : a = 0 :=
nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $
by rwa [two_mul, nat.add_le_to_le_sub, nat.sub_self] at h; refl
lemma eq_zero_of_mul_le {a b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (h : b * a ≤ a) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_double_le $ le_trans (nat.mul_le_mul_right _ hb) h
lemma le_mul_of_pos_left {m n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : m ≤ n * m :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← one_mul(m)]},
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (nat.succ_le_of_lt h) dec_trivial,
end
lemma le_mul_of_pos_right {m n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : m ≤ m * n :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← mul_one(m)]},
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (nat.succ_le_of_lt h) dec_trivial,
end
theorem two_mul_ne_two_mul_add_one {n m} : 2 * n ≠ 2 * m + 1 :=
mt (congr_arg (%2)) (by rw [add_comm, add_mul_mod_self_left, mul_mod_right]; exact dec_trivial)
/-- Recursion principle based on `<`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected def strong_rec' {p : ℕ → Sort u} (H : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → p m) → p n) : ∀ (n : ℕ), p n
| n := H n (λ m hm, strong_rec' m)
attribute [simp] nat.div_self
protected lemma div_le_of_le_mul' {m n : ℕ} {k} (h : m ≤ k * n) : m / k ≤ n :=
(eq_zero_or_pos k).elim
(λ k0, by rw [k0, nat.div_zero]; apply zero_le)
(λ k0, (decidable.mul_le_mul_left k0).1 $
calc k * (m / k)
≤ m % k + k * (m / k) : le_add_left _ _
... = m : mod_add_div _ _
... ≤ k * n : h)
protected lemma div_le_self' (m n : ℕ) : m / n ≤ m :=
(eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λ n0, by rw [n0, nat.div_zero]; apply zero_le)
(λ n0, nat.div_le_of_le_mul' $ calc
m = 1 * m : (one_mul _).symm
... ≤ n * m : mul_le_mul_right _ n0)
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le' {x y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : 0 < k) : x ≤ y / k ↔ x * k ≤ y :=
begin
revert x, refine nat.strong_rec' _ y,
clear y, intros y IH x,
cases decidable.lt_or_le y k with h h,
{ rw [div_eq_of_lt h],
cases x with x,
{ simp [zero_mul, zero_le] },
{ rw succ_mul,
exact iff_of_false (not_succ_le_zero _)
(not_le_of_lt $ lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_left _ _)) } },
{ rw [div_eq_sub_div k0 h],
cases x with x,
{ simp [zero_mul, zero_le] },
{ rw [← add_one, nat.add_le_add_iff_le_right, succ_mul,
IH _ (sub_lt_of_pos_le _ _ k0 h), add_le_to_le_sub _ h] } }
end
theorem div_mul_le_self' (m n : ℕ) : m / n * n ≤ m :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos n).elim (λ n0, by simp [n0, zero_le]) $ λ n0,
(le_div_iff_mul_le' n0).1 (le_refl _)
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul' {x y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : 0 < k) : x / k < y ↔ x < y * k :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_mul_le' k0
protected theorem div_le_div_right {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) {k : ℕ} : n / k ≤ m / k :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos k).elim (λ k0, by simp [k0]) $ λ hk,
(le_div_iff_mul_le' hk).2 $ le_trans (nat.div_mul_le_self' _ _) h
lemma lt_of_div_lt_div {m n k : ℕ} (h : m / k < n / k) : m < n :=
by_contradiction $ λ h₁, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge (nat.div_le_div_right (not_lt.1 h₁)))
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : ℕ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c :=
by rw [← H2, nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℕ} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
⟨nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℕ} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = c * b :=
by rw mul_comm; exact nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_left {a b c : ℕ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H1 H2]
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left' {a b : ℕ} (Hd : a ∣ b) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm,nat.div_mul_cancel Hd]
protected theorem div_mod_unique {n k m d : ℕ} (h : 0 < k) :
n / k = d ∧ n % k = m ↔ m + k * d = n ∧ m < k :=
⟨λ ⟨e₁, e₂⟩, e₁ ▸ e₂ ▸ ⟨mod_add_div _ _, mod_lt _ h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁ ▸ by rw [add_mul_div_left _ _ h, add_mul_mod_self_left];
simp [div_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt, h₂]⟩
lemma two_mul_odd_div_two {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 2 = 1) : 2 * (n / 2) = n - 1 :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← nat.mod_add_div n 2, hn, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]}
lemma div_dvd_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (h : b ∣ a) : (a / b) ∣ a :=
⟨b, (nat.div_mul_cancel h).symm⟩
protected lemma div_pos {a b : ℕ} (hba : b ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b :=
nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, lt_irrefl a
(calc a = a % b : by simpa [h] using (mod_add_div a b).symm
... < b : nat.mod_lt a hb
... ≤ a : hba))
protected theorem mul_left_inj {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right ha, λ e, e ▸ rfl⟩
protected theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left ha, λ e, e ▸ rfl⟩
protected lemma div_div_self : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, b ∣ a → 0 < a → a / (a / b) = b
| a 0 h₁ h₂ := by rw eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁; refl
| 0 b h₁ h₂ := absurd h₂ dec_trivial
| (a+1) (b+1) h₁ h₂ :=
(nat.mul_left_inj (nat.div_pos (le_of_dvd (succ_pos a) h₁) (succ_pos b))).1 $
by rw [nat.div_mul_cancel (div_dvd_of_dvd h₁), nat.mul_div_cancel' h₁]
protected lemma div_lt_of_lt_mul {m n k : ℕ} (h : m < n * k) : m / n < k :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
(calc n * (m / n) ≤ m % n + n * (m / n) : nat.le_add_left _ _
... = m : mod_add_div _ _
... < n * k : h)
(nat.zero_le n)
lemma lt_mul_of_div_lt {a b c : ℕ} (h : a / c < b) (w : 0 < c) : a < b * c :=
lt_of_not_ge $ not_le_of_gt h ∘ (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ w).2
protected lemma div_eq_zero_iff {a b : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) : a / b = 0 ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← mod_add_div a b, h, mul_zero, add_zero]; exact mod_lt _ hb,
λ h, by rw [← nat.mul_right_inj hb, ← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ (a % b), mod_add_div,
mod_eq_of_lt h, mul_zero, add_zero]⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_le_div {a b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ a / b) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_mul_le hb $
by rw mul_comm; exact (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le' (lt_of_lt_of_le dec_trivial hb)).1 h
lemma mul_div_le_mul_div_assoc (a b c : ℕ) : a * (b / c) ≤ (a * b) / c :=
if hc0 : c = 0 then by simp [hc0]
else (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0)).2
(by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_le_mul_left _ (nat.div_mul_le_self _ _))
lemma div_mul_div_le_div (a b c : ℕ) : ((a / c) * b) / a ≤ b / c :=
if ha0 : a = 0 then by simp [ha0]
else calc a / c * b / a ≤ b * a / c / a :
nat.div_le_div_right (by rw [mul_comm];
exact mul_div_le_mul_div_assoc _ _ _)
... = b / c : by rw [nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_comm b, mul_comm c,
nat.mul_div_mul _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero ha0)]
lemma eq_zero_of_le_half {a : ℕ} (h : a ≤ a / 2) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_le_div (le_refl _) h
lemma mod_mul_right_div_self (a b c : ℕ) : a % (b * c) / b = (a / b) % c :=
if hb : b = 0 then by simp [hb] else if hc : c = 0 then by simp [hc]
else by conv {to_rhs, rw ← mod_add_div a (b * c)};
rw [mul_assoc, nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb), add_mul_mod_self_left,
mod_eq_of_lt (nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (mod_lt _ (mul_pos (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb) (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc))))]
lemma mod_mul_left_div_self (a b c : ℕ) : a % (c * b) / b = (a / b) % c :=
by rw [mul_comm c, mod_mul_right_div_self]
/- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number -/
lemma triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * ((n + 1) - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n :=
begin
rw [← add_mul_div_left, mul_comm 2 n, ← mul_add, nat.add_sub_cancel, mul_comm],
cases n; refl, apply zero_lt_succ
end
@[simp] protected theorem dvd_one {n : ℕ} : n ∣ 1 ↔ n = 1 :=
⟨eq_one_of_dvd_one, λ e, e.symm ▸ dvd_refl _⟩
protected theorem dvd_add_left {k m n : ℕ} (h : k ∣ n) : k ∣ m + n ↔ k ∣ m :=
(nat.dvd_add_iff_left h).symm
protected theorem dvd_add_right {k m n : ℕ} (h : k ∣ m) : k ∣ m + n ↔ k ∣ n :=
(nat.dvd_add_iff_right h).symm
/-- A natural number m divides the sum m + n if and only if m divides b.-/
@[simp] protected lemma dvd_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} :
m ∣ m + n ↔ m ∣ n :=
nat.dvd_add_right (dvd_refl m)
/-- A natural number m divides the sum n + m if and only if m divides b.-/
@[simp] protected lemma dvd_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} :
m ∣ n + m ↔ m ∣ n :=
nat.dvd_add_left (dvd_refl m)
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_left {a b c : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b ∣ a * c ↔ b ∣ c :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_assoc, nat.mul_right_inj ha]
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_right {a b c : ℕ} (hc : 0 < c) : a * c ∣ b * c ↔ a ∣ b :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_right_comm, nat.mul_left_inj hc]
lemma succ_div : ∀ (a b : ℕ), (a + 1) / b =
a / b + if b ∣ a + 1 then 1 else 0
| a 0 := by simp
| 0 1 := rfl
| 0 (b+2) := have hb2 : b + 2 > 1, from dec_trivial,
by simp [ne_of_gt hb2, div_eq_of_lt hb2]
| (a+1) (b+1) := begin
rw [nat.div_def], conv_rhs { rw nat.div_def },
by_cases hb_eq_a : b = a + 1,
{ simp [hb_eq_a, le_refl] },
by_cases hb_le_a1 : b ≤ a + 1,
{ have hb_le_a : b ≤ a, from le_of_lt_succ (lt_of_le_of_ne hb_le_a1 hb_eq_a),
have h₁ : (0 < b + 1 ∧ b + 1 ≤ a + 1 + 1),
from ⟨succ_pos _, (add_le_add_iff_right _).2 hb_le_a1⟩,
have h₂ : (0 < b + 1 ∧ b + 1 ≤ a + 1),
from ⟨succ_pos _, (add_le_add_iff_right _).2 hb_le_a⟩,
have dvd_iff : b + 1 ∣ a - b + 1 ↔ b + 1 ∣ a + 1 + 1,
{ rw [nat.dvd_add_iff_left (dvd_refl (b + 1)),
← nat.add_sub_add_right a 1 b, add_comm (_ - _), add_assoc,
nat.sub_add_cancel (succ_le_succ hb_le_a), add_comm 1] },
have wf : a - b < a + 1, from lt_succ_of_le (nat.sub_le_self _ _),
rw [if_pos h₁, if_pos h₂, nat.add_sub_add_right, nat.sub_add_comm hb_le_a,
by exact have _ := wf, succ_div (a - b),
nat.add_sub_add_right],
simp [dvd_iff, succ_eq_add_one, add_comm 1, add_assoc] },
{ have hba : ¬ b ≤ a,
from not_le_of_gt (lt_trans (lt_succ_self a) (lt_of_not_ge hb_le_a1)),
have hb_dvd_a : ¬ b + 1 ∣ a + 2,
from λ h, hb_le_a1 (le_of_succ_le_succ (le_of_dvd (succ_pos _) h)),
simp [hba, hb_le_a1, hb_dvd_a], }
end
lemma succ_div_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hba : b ∣ a + 1) :
(a + 1) / b = a / b + 1 :=
by rw [succ_div, if_pos hba]
lemma succ_div_of_not_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hba : ¬ b ∣ a + 1) :
(a + 1) / b = a / b :=
by rw [succ_div, if_neg hba, add_zero]
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (n : nat) {m k : nat} (h : m ∣ k) : n % k % m = n % m :=
begin
conv { to_rhs, rw ←mod_add_div n k },
rcases h with ⟨t, rfl⟩, rw [mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
end
@[simp] theorem mod_mod (a n : ℕ) : (a % n) % n = a % n :=
(eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λ n0, by simp [n0])
(λ npos, mod_eq_of_lt (mod_lt _ npos))
/-- If `a` and `b` are equal mod `c`, `a - b` is zero mod `c`. -/
lemma sub_mod_eq_zero_of_mod_eq {a b c : ℕ} (h : a % c = b % c) : (a - b) % c = 0 :=
by rw [←nat.mod_add_div a c, ←nat.mod_add_div b c, ←h, ←nat.sub_sub, nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
←nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, nat.mul_mod_right]
lemma dvd_sub_mod (k : ℕ) : n ∣ (k - (k % n)) :=
⟨k / n, nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add (nat.mod_add_div k n).symm⟩
@[simp] theorem mod_add_mod (m n k : ℕ) : (m % n + k) % n = (m + k) % n :=
by have := (add_mul_mod_self_left (m % n + k) n (m / n)).symm;
rwa [add_right_comm, mod_add_div] at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_mod (m n k : ℕ) : (m + n % k) % k = (m + n) % k :=
by rw [add_comm, mod_add_mod, add_comm]
lemma add_mod (a b n : ℕ) : (a + b) % n = ((a % n) + (b % n)) % n :=
by rw [add_mod_mod, mod_add_mod]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_right {m n k : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(m + i) % n = (k + i) % n :=
by rw [← mod_add_mod, ← mod_add_mod k, H]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_left {m n k : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _ H, add_comm]
lemma mul_mod (a b n : ℕ) : (a * b) % n = ((a % n) * (b % n)) % n :=
begin
conv_lhs {
rw [←mod_add_div a n, ←mod_add_div b n, right_distrib, left_distrib, left_distrib,
mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ←left_distrib n _ _, add_mul_mod_self_left,
mul_comm _ (n * (b / n)), mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left] }
end
theorem add_pos_left {m : ℕ} (h : 0 < m) (n : ℕ) : 0 < m + n :=
calc
m + n > 0 + n : nat.add_lt_add_right h n
... = n : nat.zero_add n
... ≥ 0 : zero_le n
theorem add_pos_right (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : 0 < m + n :=
begin rw add_comm, exact add_pos_left h m end
theorem add_pos_iff_pos_or_pos (m n : ℕ) : 0 < m + n ↔ 0 < m ∨ 0 < n :=
iff.intro
begin
intro h,
cases m with m,
{simp [zero_add] at h, exact or.inr h},
exact or.inl (succ_pos _)
end
begin
intro h, cases h with mpos npos,
{ apply add_pos_left mpos },
apply add_pos_right _ npos
end
lemma add_eq_one_iff : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, a + b = 1 ↔ (a = 0 ∧ b = 1) ∨ (a = 1 ∧ b = 0)
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 1 := dec_trivial
| 1 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 1 := dec_trivial
| (a+2) _ := by rw add_right_comm; exact dec_trivial
| _ (b+2) := by rw [← add_assoc]; simp only [nat.succ_inj', nat.succ_ne_zero]; simp
lemma mul_eq_one_iff : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, a * b = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∧ b = 1
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 1 := dec_trivial
| 1 0 := dec_trivial
| (a+2) 0 := by simp
| 0 (b+2) := by simp
| (a+1) (b+1) := ⟨λ h, by simp only [add_mul, mul_add, mul_add, one_mul, mul_one,
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm, nat.succ_inj', add_eq_zero_iff] at h; simp [h.1.2, h.2],
by clear_aux_decl; finish⟩
lemma mul_right_eq_self_iff {a b : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 :=
suffices a * b = a * 1 ↔ b = 1, by rwa mul_one at this,
nat.mul_right_inj ha
lemma mul_left_eq_self_iff {a b : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 :=
by rw [mul_comm, nat.mul_right_eq_self_iff hb]
lemma lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq {n i : ℕ} : n < i.succ ↔ (n < i ∨ n = i) :=
lt_succ_iff.trans le_iff_lt_or_eq
theorem le_zero_iff {i : ℕ} : i ≤ 0 ↔ i = 0 :=
⟨nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, assume h, h ▸ le_refl i⟩
theorem le_add_one_iff {i j : ℕ} : i ≤ j + 1 ↔ (i ≤ j ∨ i = j + 1) :=
⟨assume h,
match nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h with
| or.inl h := or.inr h
| or.inr h := or.inl $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h
end,
or.rec (assume h, le_trans h $ nat.le_add_right _ _) le_of_eq⟩
theorem mul_self_inj {n m : ℕ} : n * n = m * m ↔ n = m :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans (le_antisymm_iff.trans
(and_congr mul_self_le_mul_self_iff mul_self_le_mul_self_iff)).symm
section facts
-- Inject some simple facts into the typeclass system.
-- This `fact` should not be confused with the factorial function `nat.fact`!
instance succ_pos'' (n : ℕ) : _root_.fact (0 < n.succ) := n.succ_pos
instance pos_of_one_lt (n : ℕ) [h : fact (1 < n)] : fact (0 < n) :=
lt_trans zero_lt_one h
end facts
instance decidable_ball_lt (n : nat) (P : Π k < n, Prop) :
∀ [H : ∀ n h, decidable (P n h)], decidable (∀ n h, P n h) :=
begin
induction n with n IH; intro; resetI,
{ exact is_true (λ n, dec_trivial) },
cases IH (λ k h, P k (lt_succ_of_lt h)) with h,
{ refine is_false (mt _ h), intros hn k h, apply hn },
by_cases p : P n (lt_succ_self n),
{ exact is_true (λ k h',
(lt_or_eq_of_le $ le_of_lt_succ h').elim (h _)
(λ e, match k, e, h' with _, rfl, h := p end)) },
{ exact is_false (mt (λ hn, hn _ _) p) }
end
instance decidable_forall_fin {n : ℕ} (P : fin n → Prop)
[H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀ i, P i) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ k h, P ⟨k, h⟩) ⟨λ a ⟨k, h⟩, a k h, λ a k h, a ⟨k, h⟩⟩
instance decidable_ball_le (n : ℕ) (P : Π k ≤ n, Prop)
[H : ∀ n h, decidable (P n h)] : decidable (∀ n h, P n h) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ k (h : k < succ n), P k (le_of_lt_succ h))
⟨λ a k h, a k (lt_succ_of_le h), λ a k h, a k _⟩
instance decidable_lo_hi (lo hi : ℕ) (P : ℕ → Prop) [H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀x, lo ≤ x → x < hi → P x) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ x < hi - lo, P (lo + x))
⟨λal x hl hh, by have := al (x - lo) (lt_of_not_ge $
(not_congr (nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff _ _ _ hl)).2 $ not_le_of_gt hh);
rwa [nat.add_sub_of_le hl] at this,
λal x h, al _ (nat.le_add_right _ _) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left h)⟩
instance decidable_lo_hi_le (lo hi : ℕ) (P : ℕ → Prop) [H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀x, lo ≤ x → x ≤ hi → P x) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀x, lo ≤ x → x < hi + 1 → P x) $
ball_congr $ λ x hl, imp_congr lt_succ_iff iff.rfl
protected theorem bit0_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : bit0 n ≤ bit0 m :=
add_le_add h h
protected theorem bit1_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : bit1 n ≤ bit1 m :=
succ_le_succ (add_le_add h h)
theorem bit_le : ∀ (b : bool) {n m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → bit b n ≤ bit b m
| tt n m h := nat.bit1_le h
| ff n m h := nat.bit0_le h
theorem bit_ne_zero (b) {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : bit b n ≠ 0 :=
by cases b; [exact nat.bit0_ne_zero h, exact nat.bit1_ne_zero _]
theorem bit0_le_bit : ∀ (b) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit0 m ≤ bit b n
| tt m n h := le_of_lt $ nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h
| ff m n h := nat.bit0_le h
theorem bit_le_bit1 : ∀ (b) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit b m ≤ bit1 n
| ff m n h := le_of_lt $ nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h
| tt m n h := nat.bit1_le h
theorem bit_lt_bit0 : ∀ (b) {n m : ℕ}, n < m → bit b n < bit0 m
| tt n m h := nat.bit1_lt_bit0 h
| ff n m h := nat.bit0_lt h
theorem bit_lt_bit (a b) {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : bit a n < bit b m :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (bit_lt_bit0 _ h) (bit0_le_bit _ (le_refl _))
@[simp] lemma bit0_le_bit1_iff : bit0 k ≤ bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [← nat.lt_succ_iff, n.bit1_eq_succ_bit0, ← n.bit0_succ_eq,
bit0_lt_bit0, nat.lt_succ_iff] at h, λ h, le_of_lt (nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h)⟩
@[simp] lemma bit0_lt_bit1_iff : bit0 k < bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, bit0_le_bit1_iff.1 (le_of_lt h), nat.bit0_lt_bit1⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_le_bit0_iff : bit1 k ≤ bit0 n ↔ k < n :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [k.bit1_eq_succ_bit0, succ_le_iff, bit0_lt_bit0] at h,
λ h, le_of_lt (nat.bit1_lt_bit0 h)⟩
@[simp] lemma bit1_lt_bit0_iff : bit1 k < bit0 n ↔ k < n :=
⟨λ h, bit1_le_bit0_iff.1 (le_of_lt h), nat.bit1_lt_bit0⟩
@[simp] lemma one_le_bit0_iff : 1 ≤ bit0 n ↔ 0 < n :=
by { convert bit1_le_bit0_iff, refl, }
@[simp] lemma one_lt_bit0_iff : 1 < bit0 n ↔ 1 ≤ n :=
by { convert bit1_lt_bit0_iff, refl, }
@[simp] lemma bit_le_bit_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k ≤ bit b n ↔ k ≤ n
| ff := bit0_le_bit0
| tt := bit1_le_bit1
@[simp] lemma bit_lt_bit_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k < bit b n ↔ k < n
| ff := bit0_lt_bit0
| tt := bit1_lt_bit1
@[simp] lemma bit_le_bit1_iff : ∀ {b : bool}, bit b k ≤ bit1 n ↔ k ≤ n
| ff := bit0_le_bit1_iff
| tt := bit1_le_bit1
lemma pos_of_bit0_pos {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < bit0 n) : 0 < n :=
by { cases n, cases h, apply succ_pos, }
/-- Define a function on `ℕ` depending on parity of the argument. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def bit_cases {C : ℕ → Sort u} (H : Π b n, C (bit b n)) (n : ℕ) : C n :=
eq.rec_on n.bit_decomp (H (bodd n) (div2 n))
/- partial subtraction -/
/-- Partial predecessor operation. Returns `ppred n = some m`
if `n = m + 1`, otherwise `none`. -/
@[simp] def ppred : ℕ → option ℕ
| 0 := none
| (n+1) := some n
/-- Partial subtraction operation. Returns `psub m n = some k`
if `m = n + k`, otherwise `none`. -/
@[simp] def psub (m : ℕ) : ℕ → option ℕ
| 0 := some m
| (n+1) := psub n >>= ppred
theorem pred_eq_ppred (n : ℕ) : pred n = (ppred n).get_or_else 0 :=
by cases n; refl
theorem sub_eq_psub (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, m - n = (psub m n).get_or_else 0
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := (pred_eq_ppred (m-n)).trans $
by rw [sub_eq_psub, psub]; cases psub m n; refl
@[simp] theorem ppred_eq_some {m : ℕ} : ∀ {n}, ppred n = some m ↔ succ m = n
| 0 := by split; intro h; contradiction
| (n+1) := by dsimp; split; intro h; injection h; subst n
@[simp] theorem ppred_eq_none : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ppred n = none ↔ n = 0
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by dsimp; split; contradiction
theorem psub_eq_some {m : ℕ} : ∀ {n k}, psub m n = some k ↔ k + n = m
| 0 k := by simp [eq_comm]
| (n+1) k :=
begin
dsimp,
apply option.bind_eq_some.trans,
simp [psub_eq_some, add_comm, add_left_comm, nat.succ_eq_add_one]
end
theorem psub_eq_none (m n : ℕ) : psub m n = none ↔ m < n :=
begin
cases s : psub m n; simp [eq_comm],
{ show m < n, refine lt_of_not_ge (λ h, _),
cases le.dest h with k e,
injection s.symm.trans (psub_eq_some.2 $ (add_comm _ _).trans e) },
{ show n ≤ m, rw ← psub_eq_some.1 s, apply le_add_left }
end
theorem ppred_eq_pred {n} (h : 0 < n) : ppred n = some (pred n) :=
ppred_eq_some.2 $ succ_pred_eq_of_pos h
theorem psub_eq_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : psub m n = some (m - n) :=
psub_eq_some.2 $ nat.sub_add_cancel h
theorem psub_add (m n k) : psub m (n + k) = do x ← psub m n, psub x k :=
by induction k; simp [*, add_succ, bind_assoc]
/- pow -/
attribute [simp] nat.pow_zero nat.pow_one
@[simp] lemma one_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, 1 ^ n = 1
| 0 := rfl
| (k+1) := show 1^k * 1 = 1, by rw [mul_one, one_pow]
theorem pow_add (a m n : ℕ) : a^(m + n) = a^m * a^n :=
by induction n; simp [*, pow_succ, mul_assoc]
theorem pow_two (a : ℕ) : a ^ 2 = a * a := show (1 * a) * a = _, by rw one_mul
theorem pow_dvd_pow (a : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : a^m ∣ a^n :=
by rw [← nat.add_sub_cancel' h, pow_add]; apply dvd_mul_right
theorem pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (h : a ∣ b) : ∀ n:ℕ, a^n ∣ b^n
| 0 := dvd_refl _
| (n+1) := mul_dvd_mul (pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd n) h
theorem mul_pow (a b n : ℕ) : (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [*, nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem pow_mul (a b n : ℕ) : n ^ (a * b) = (n ^ a) ^ b :=
by induction b; simp [*, nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.pow_add, mul_add, mul_comm]
theorem pow_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < p ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (k+1) := mul_pos (pow_pos _) hp
lemma pow_eq_mul_pow_sub (p : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : p ^ m * p ^ (n - m) = p ^ n :=
by rw [←nat.pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
lemma pow_lt_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (h : 1 < p) (n : ℕ) : p^n < p^(n+1) :=
suffices p^n*1 < p^n*p, by simpa,
nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (nat.pow_pos (lt_of_succ_lt h) n)
lemma lt_pow_self {p : ℕ} (h : 1 < p) : ∀ n : ℕ, n < p ^ n
| 0 := by simp [zero_lt_one]
| (n+1) := calc
n + 1 < p^n + 1 : nat.add_lt_add_right (lt_pow_self _) _
... ≤ p ^ (n+1) : pow_lt_pow_succ h _
lemma lt_two_pow (n : ℕ) : n < 2^n :=
lt_pow_self dec_trivial n
lemma one_le_pow (n m : ℕ) (h : 0 < m) : 1 ≤ m^n :=
one_pow n ▸ pow_le_pow_of_le_left h n
lemma one_le_pow' (n m : ℕ) : 1 ≤ (m+1)^n := one_le_pow n (m+1) (succ_pos m)
lemma one_le_two_pow (n : ℕ) : 1 ≤ 2^n := one_le_pow n 2 dec_trivial
lemma one_lt_pow (n m : ℕ) (h₀ : 0 < n) (h₁ : 1 < m) : 1 < m^n :=
one_pow n ▸ pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h₀
lemma one_lt_pow' (n m : ℕ) : 1 < (m+2)^(n+1) :=
one_lt_pow (n+1) (m+2) (succ_pos n) (nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)
lemma one_lt_two_pow (n : ℕ) (h₀ : 0 < n) : 1 < 2^n := one_lt_pow n 2 h₀ dec_trivial
lemma one_lt_two_pow' (n : ℕ) : 1 < 2^(n+1) := one_lt_pow (n+1) 2 (succ_pos n) dec_trivial
lemma pow_right_strict_mono {x : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : strict_mono (nat.pow x) :=
λ _ _, pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right k
lemma pow_le_iff_le_right {x m n : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : x^m ≤ x^n ↔ m ≤ n :=
strict_mono.le_iff_le (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_lt_iff_lt_right {x m n : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : x^m < x^n ↔ m < n :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_right_injective {x : ℕ} (k : 2 ≤ x) : function.injective (nat.pow x) :=
strict_mono.injective (pow_right_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_dvd_pow_iff_pow_le_pow {k l : ℕ} : Π {x : ℕ} (w : 0 < x), x^k ∣ x^l ↔ x^k ≤ x^l
| (x+1) w :=
begin
split,
{ intro a, exact le_of_dvd (pow_pos (succ_pos x) l) a, },
{ intro a, cases x with x,
{ simp only [one_pow], },
{ have le := (pow_le_iff_le_right (le_add_left _ _)).mp a,
use (x+2)^(l-k),
rw [←nat.pow_add, add_comm k, nat.sub_add_cancel le], } }
end
/-- If `1 < x`, then `x^k` divides `x^l` if and only if `k` is at most `l`. -/
lemma pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right {x k l : ℕ} (w : 1 < x) : x^k ∣ x^l ↔ k ≤ l :=
by rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_pow_le_pow (lt_of_succ_lt w), pow_le_iff_le_right w]
lemma pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right' {b k l : ℕ} : (b+2)^k ∣ (b+2)^l ↔ k ≤ l :=
pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right (nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)
lemma pow_left_strict_mono {m : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : strict_mono (λ (x : ℕ), x^m) :=
λ _ _ h, pow_lt_pow_of_lt_left h k
lemma pow_le_iff_le_left {m x y : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : x^m ≤ y^m ↔ x ≤ y :=
strict_mono.le_iff_le (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_lt_iff_lt_left {m x y : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : x^m < y^m ↔ x < y :=
strict_mono.lt_iff_lt (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma pow_left_injective {m : ℕ} (k : 1 ≤ m) : function.injective (λ (x : ℕ), x^m) :=
strict_mono.injective (pow_left_strict_mono k)
lemma not_pos_pow_dvd : ∀ {p k : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hk : 1 < k), ¬ p^k ∣ p
| (succ p) (succ k) hp hk h :=
have (succ p)^k * succ p ∣ 1 * succ p, by simpa,
have (succ p) ^ k ∣ 1, from dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (succ_pos _) this,
have he : (succ p) ^ k = 1, from eq_one_of_dvd_one this,
have k < (succ p) ^ k, from lt_pow_self hp k,
have k < 1, by rwa [he] at this,
have k = 0, from eq_zero_of_le_zero $ le_of_lt_succ this,
have 1 < 1, by rwa [this] at hk,
absurd this dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bodd_div2_eq (n : ℕ) : bodd_div2 n = (bodd n, div2 n) :=
by unfold bodd div2; cases bodd_div2 n; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit0 (n) : bodd (bit0 n) = ff := bodd_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit1 (n) : bodd (bit1 n) = tt := bodd_bit tt n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit0 (n) : div2 (bit0 n) = n := div2_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit1 (n) : div2 (bit1 n) = n := div2_bit tt n
/- size and shift -/
theorem shiftl'_ne_zero_left (b) {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) : shiftl' b m n ≠ 0 :=
by induction n; simp [shiftl', bit_ne_zero, *]
theorem shiftl'_tt_ne_zero (m) : ∀ {n} (h : n ≠ 0), shiftl' tt m n ≠ 0
| 0 h := absurd rfl h
| (succ n) _ := nat.bit1_ne_zero _
@[simp] theorem size_zero : size 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_bit {b n} (h : bit b n ≠ 0) : size (bit b n) = succ (size n) :=
begin
rw size,
conv { to_lhs, rw [binary_rec], simp [h] },
rw div2_bit,
end
@[simp] theorem size_bit0 {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : size (bit0 n) = succ (size n) :=
@size_bit ff n (nat.bit0_ne_zero h)
@[simp] theorem size_bit1 (n) : size (bit1 n) = succ (size n) :=
@size_bit tt n (nat.bit1_ne_zero n)
@[simp] theorem size_one : size 1 = 1 := by apply size_bit1 0
@[simp] theorem size_shiftl' {b m n} (h : shiftl' b m n ≠ 0) :
size (shiftl' b m n) = size m + n :=
begin
induction n with n IH; simp [shiftl'] at h ⊢,
rw [size_bit h, nat.add_succ],
by_cases s0 : shiftl' b m n = 0; [skip, rw [IH s0]],
rw s0 at h ⊢,
cases b, {exact absurd rfl h},
have : shiftl' tt m n + 1 = 1 := congr_arg (+1) s0,
rw [shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow] at this,
have m0 := succ_inj (eq_one_of_dvd_one ⟨_, this.symm⟩),
subst m0,
simp at this,
have : n = 0 := eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_not_gt $ λ hn,
ne_of_gt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right dec_trivial hn) this),
subst n, refl
end
@[simp] theorem size_shiftl {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) :
size (shiftl m n) = size m + n :=
size_shiftl' (shiftl'_ne_zero_left _ h _)
theorem lt_size_self (n : ℕ) : n < 2^size n :=
begin
rw [← one_shiftl],
have : ∀ {n}, n = 0 → n < shiftl 1 (size n) :=
λ n e, by subst e; exact dec_trivial,
apply binary_rec _ _ n, {apply this rfl},
intros b n IH,
by_cases bit b n = 0, {apply this h},
rw [size_bit h, shiftl_succ],
exact bit_lt_bit0 _ IH
end
theorem size_le {m n : ℕ} : size m ≤ n ↔ m < 2^n :=
⟨λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_size_self _) (pow_le_pow_of_le_right dec_trivial h),
begin
rw [← one_shiftl], revert n,
apply binary_rec _ _ m,
{ intros n h, apply zero_le },
{ intros b m IH n h,
by_cases e : bit b m = 0, { rw e, apply zero_le },
rw [size_bit e],
cases n with n,
{ exact e.elim (eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_lt_succ h)) },
{ apply succ_le_succ (IH _),
apply lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h', bit0_le_bit _ h') h } }
end⟩
theorem lt_size {m n : ℕ} : m < size n ↔ 2^m ≤ n :=
by rw [← not_lt, iff_not_comm, not_lt, size_le]
theorem size_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < size n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw lt_size; refl
theorem size_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : size n = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by have := @size_pos n; simp [pos_iff_ne_zero] at this;
exact not_iff_not.1 this
theorem size_pow {n : ℕ} : size (2^n) = n+1 :=
le_antisymm
(size_le.2 $ pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right dec_trivial (lt_succ_self _))
(lt_size.2 $ le_refl _)
theorem size_le_size {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : size m ≤ size n :=
size_le.2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt h (lt_size_self _)
/- factorial -/
/-- `fact n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
@[simp] def fact : nat → nat
| 0 := 1
| (succ n) := succ n * fact n
@[simp] theorem fact_zero : fact 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fact_succ (n) : fact (succ n) = succ n * fact n := rfl
@[simp] theorem fact_one : fact 1 = 1 := rfl
theorem fact_pos : ∀ n, 0 < fact n
| 0 := zero_lt_one
| (succ n) := mul_pos (succ_pos _) (fact_pos n)
theorem fact_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : fact n ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (fact_pos _)
theorem fact_dvd_fact {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : fact m ∣ fact n :=
begin
induction n with n IH; simp,
{ have := eq_zero_of_le_zero h, subst m, simp },
{ cases eq_or_lt_of_le h with he hl,
{ subst m, simp },
{ apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (IH (le_of_lt_succ hl)) } }
end
theorem dvd_fact : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ fact n
| (succ m) n _ h := dvd_of_mul_right_dvd (fact_dvd_fact h)
theorem fact_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : fact m ≤ fact n :=
le_of_dvd (fact_pos _) (fact_dvd_fact h)
lemma fact_mul_pow_le_fact : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.fact * m.succ ^ n ≤ (m + n).fact
| m 0 := by simp
| m (n+1) :=
by rw [← add_assoc, nat.fact_succ, mul_comm (nat.succ _), nat.pow_succ, ← mul_assoc];
exact mul_le_mul fact_mul_pow_le_fact
(nat.succ_le_succ (nat.le_add_right _ _)) (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)
lemma monotone_fact : monotone fact := λ n m, fact_le
lemma fact_lt (h0 : 0 < n) : n.fact < m.fact ↔ n < m :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw [← not_le], intro hmn, apply not_le_of_lt h (fact_le hmn) },
{ have : ∀(n : ℕ), 0 < n → n.fact < n.succ.fact,
{ intros k hk, rw [fact_succ, succ_mul, lt_add_iff_pos_left],
apply mul_pos hk (fact_pos k) },
induction h generalizing h0,
{ exact this _ h0, },
{ refine lt_trans (h_ih h0) (this _ _), exact lt_trans h0 (lt_of_succ_le h_a) }}
end
lemma one_lt_fact : 1 < n.fact ↔ 1 < n :=
by { convert fact_lt _, refl, exact one_pos }
lemma fact_eq_one : n.fact = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_fact, h], apply lt_irrefl },
{ cases h with h h, refl, cases h, refl }
end
lemma fact_inj (h0 : 1 < n.fact) : n.fact = m.fact ↔ n = m :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rcases lt_trichotomy n m with hnm|hnm|hnm,
{ exfalso, rw [← fact_lt, h] at hnm, exact lt_irrefl _ hnm,
rw [one_lt_fact] at h0, exact lt_trans one_pos h0 },
{ exact hnm },
{ exfalso, rw [← fact_lt, h] at hnm, exact lt_irrefl _ hnm,
rw [h, one_lt_fact] at h0, exact lt_trans one_pos h0 }},
{ rw h }
end
/- choose -/
/-- `choose n k` is the number of `k`-element subsets in an `n`-element set. Also known as binomial
coefficients. -/
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _ 0 := 1
| 0 (k + 1) := 0
| (n + 1) (k + 1) := choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
@[simp] lemma choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 := rfl
lemma choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) := rfl
lemma choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _ 0 hk := absurd hk dec_trivial
| 0 (k + 1) hk := choose_zero_succ _
| (n + 1) (k + 1) hk :=
have hnk : n < k, from lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk,
have hnk1 : n < k + 1, from lt_of_succ_lt hk,
by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
@[simp] lemma choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 :=
by induction n; simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
@[simp] lemma choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n :=
by induction n; simp [*, choose, add_comm]
/-- `choose n 2` is the `n`-th triangle number. -/
lemma choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
simp,
{rw triangle_succ n, simp [choose, ih], rw add_comm},
end
lemma choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0 _ hk := by rw [eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; exact dec_trivial
| (n + 1) 0 hk := by simp; exact dec_trivial
| (n + 1) (k + 1) hk := by rw choose_succ_succ;
exact add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) (nat.zero_le _)
lemma succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 (k + 1) := by simp [choose]
| (n + 1) 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) (k + 1) :=
by rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), add_mul, ←succ_mul_choose_eq, mul_succ,
←succ_mul_choose_eq, add_right_comm, ←mul_add, ←choose_succ_succ, ←succ_mul]
lemma choose_mul_fact_mul_fact : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * fact k * fact (n - k) = fact n
| 0 _ hk := by simp [eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| (n + 1) 0 hk := by simp
| (n + 1) (succ k) hk :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ hk₁,
{ have h : choose n k * fact (succ k) * fact (n - k) = succ k * fact n :=
by rw ← choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (le_of_succ_le_succ hk);
simp [fact_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm],
have h₁ : fact (n - k) = (n - k) * fact (n - succ k) :=
by rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), fact_succ],
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * fact (succ k) * ((n - k) * fact (n - succ k)) = (n - k) * fact n :=
by rw ← choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (le_of_lt_succ hk₁);
simp [fact_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc],
have h₃ : k * fact n ≤ n * fact n := mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk),
rw [choose_succ_succ, add_mul, add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, ← add_one, add_mul, nat.mul_sub_right_distrib,
fact_succ, ← nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, add_assoc, ← add_mul, nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm] },
{ simp [hk₁, mul_comm, choose, nat.sub_self] }
end
theorem choose_eq_fact_div_fact {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n k = fact n / (fact k * fact (n - k)) :=
begin
have : fact n = choose n k * (fact k * fact (n - k)) :=
by rw ← mul_assoc; exact (choose_mul_fact_mul_fact hk).symm,
exact (nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (mul_pos (fact_pos _) (fact_pos _)) this).symm
end
theorem fact_mul_fact_dvd_fact {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : fact k * fact (n - k) ∣ fact n :=
by rw [←choose_mul_fact_mul_fact hk, mul_assoc]; exact dvd_mul_left _ _
@[simp] lemma choose_symm {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n (n-k) = choose n k :=
by rw [choose_eq_fact_div_fact hk, choose_eq_fact_div_fact (sub_le _ _), nat.sub_sub_self hk, mul_comm]
lemma choose_symm_of_eq_add {n a b : ℕ} (h : n = a + b) : nat.choose n a = nat.choose n b :=
by { convert nat.choose_symm (nat.le_add_left _ _), rw nat.add_sub_cancel}
lemma choose_symm_add {a b : ℕ} : choose (a+b) a = choose (a+b) b :=
choose_symm_of_eq_add rfl
lemma choose_symm_half (m : ℕ) : choose (2 * m + 1) (m + 1) = choose (2 * m + 1) m :=
by { apply choose_symm_of_eq_add, rw [add_comm m 1, add_assoc 1 m m, add_comm (2 * m) 1, two_mul m] }
lemma choose_succ_right_eq (n k : ℕ) : choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) = choose n k * (n - k) :=
begin
have e : (n+1) * choose n k = choose n k * (k+1) + choose n (k+1) * (k+1),
rw [← right_distrib, ← choose_succ_succ, succ_mul_choose_eq],
rw [← nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add e, mul_comm, ← nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, nat.add_sub_add_right]
end
@[simp] lemma choose_succ_self_right : ∀ (n:ℕ), (n+1).choose n = n+1
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_succ_self_right, choose_self]
lemma choose_mul_succ_eq (n k : ℕ) :
(n.choose k) * (n + 1) = ((n+1).choose k) * (n + 1 - k) :=
begin
induction k with k ih, { simp },
by_cases hk : n < k + 1,
{ rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, sub_eq_zero_of_le hk, zero_mul, mul_zero] },
push_neg at hk,
replace hk : k + 1 ≤ n + 1 := _root_.le_add_right hk,
rw [choose_succ_succ],
rw [add_mul, succ_sub_succ],
rw [← choose_succ_right_eq],
rw [← succ_sub_succ, nat.mul_sub_left_distrib],
symmetry,
apply nat.add_sub_cancel',
exact mul_le_mul_left _ hk,
end
theorem units_eq_one (u : units ℕ) : u = 1 :=
units.ext $ nat.eq_one_of_dvd_one ⟨u.inv, u.val_inv.symm⟩
theorem add_units_eq_zero (u : add_units ℕ) : u = 0 :=
add_units.ext $ (nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero u.val_neg).1
@[simp] protected theorem is_unit_iff {n : ℕ} : is_unit n ↔ n = 1 :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨u, hu⟩, match n, u, hu, nat.units_eq_one u with _, _, rfl, rfl := rfl end)
(assume h, h.symm ▸ ⟨1, rfl⟩)
section find_greatest
/-- `find_greatest P b` is the largest `i ≤ bound` such that `P i` holds, or `0` if no such `i`
exists -/
protected def find_greatest (P : ℕ → Prop) [decidable_pred P] : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (n + 1) := if P (n + 1) then n + 1 else find_greatest n
variables {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P]
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_zero : nat.find_greatest P 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_eq : ∀{b}, P b → nat.find_greatest P b = b
| 0 h := rfl
| (n + 1) h := by simp [nat.find_greatest, h]
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_of_not {b} (h : ¬ P (b + 1)) :
nat.find_greatest P (b + 1) = nat.find_greatest P b :=
by simp [nat.find_greatest, h]
lemma find_greatest_spec_and_le :
∀{b m}, m ≤ b → P m → P (nat.find_greatest P b) ∧ m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b
| 0 m hm hP :=
have m = 0, from le_antisymm hm (nat.zero_le _),
show P 0 ∧ m ≤ 0, from this ▸ ⟨hP, le_refl _⟩
| (b + 1) m hm hP :=
begin
by_cases h : P (b + 1),
{ simp [h, hm] },
{ have : m ≠ b + 1 := assume this, h $ this ▸ hP,
have : m ≤ b := (le_of_not_gt $ assume h : b + 1 ≤ m, this $ le_antisymm hm h),
have : P (nat.find_greatest P b) ∧ m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b :=
find_greatest_spec_and_le this hP,
simp [h, this] }
end
lemma find_greatest_spec {b} : (∃m, m ≤ b ∧ P m) → P (nat.find_greatest P b)
| ⟨m, hmb, hm⟩ := (find_greatest_spec_and_le hmb hm).1
lemma find_greatest_le : ∀ {b}, nat.find_greatest P b ≤ b
| 0 := le_refl _
| (b + 1) :=
have nat.find_greatest P b ≤ b + 1, from le_trans find_greatest_le (nat.le_succ b),
by by_cases P (b + 1); simp [h, this]
lemma le_find_greatest {b m} (hmb : m ≤ b) (hm : P m) : m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b :=
(find_greatest_spec_and_le hmb hm).2
lemma find_greatest_is_greatest {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] {b} :
(∃ m, m ≤ b ∧ P m) → ∀ k, nat.find_greatest P b < k ∧ k ≤ b → ¬ P k
| ⟨m, hmb, hP⟩ k ⟨hk, hkb⟩ hPk := lt_irrefl k $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_find_greatest hkb hPk) hk
lemma find_greatest_eq_zero {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] :
∀ {b}, (∀ n ≤ b, ¬ P n) → nat.find_greatest P b = 0
| 0 h := find_greatest_zero
| (n + 1) h :=
begin
have := nat.find_greatest_of_not (h (n + 1) (le_refl _)),
rw this, exact find_greatest_eq_zero (assume k hk, h k (le_trans hk $ nat.le_succ _))
end
lemma find_greatest_of_ne_zero {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] :
∀ {b m}, nat.find_greatest P b = m → m ≠ 0 → P m
| 0 m rfl h := by { have := @find_greatest_zero P _, contradiction }
| (b + 1) m rfl h :=
decidable.by_cases
(assume hb : P (b + 1), by { have := find_greatest_eq hb, rw this, exact hb })
(assume hb : ¬ P (b + 1), find_greatest_of_ne_zero (find_greatest_of_not hb).symm h)
end find_greatest
section div
lemma dvd_div_of_mul_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c / a :=
if ha : a = 0 then
by simp [ha]
else
have ha : 0 < a, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero ha,
have h1 : ∃ d, c = a * b * d, from h,
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := h1 in
have hac : a ∣ c, from dvd_of_mul_right_dvd h,
have h2 : c / a = b * d, from nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right ha (by simpa [mul_assoc] using hd),
show ∃ d, c / a = b * d, from ⟨d, h2⟩
lemma mul_dvd_of_dvd_div {a b c : ℕ} (hab : c ∣ b) (h : a ∣ b / c) : c * a ∣ b :=
have h1 : ∃ d, b / c = a * d, from h,
have h2 : ∃ e, b = c * e, from hab,
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := h1, ⟨e, he⟩ := h2 in
have h3 : b = a * d * c, from
nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left hab hd,
show ∃ d, b = c * a * d, from ⟨d, by cc⟩
lemma div_mul_div {a b c d : ℕ} (hab : b ∣ a) (hcd : d ∣ c) :
(a / b) * (c / d) = (a * c) / (b * d) :=
have exi1 : ∃ x, a = b * x, from hab,
have exi2 : ∃ y, c = d * y, from hcd,
if hb : b = 0 then by simp [hb]
else have 0 < b, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb,
if hd : d = 0 then by simp [hd]
else have 0 < d, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero hd,
begin
cases exi1 with x hx, cases exi2 with y hy,
rw [hx, hy, nat.mul_div_cancel_left, nat.mul_div_cancel_left],
symmetry,
apply nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left,
apply mul_pos,
repeat {assumption},
cc
end
lemma pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd {p m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hdiv : p ^ n ∣ k) : p ^ m ∣ k :=
have p ^ m ∣ p ^ n, from pow_dvd_pow _ hmn,
dvd_trans this hdiv
lemma dvd_of_pow_dvd {p k m : ℕ} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hpk : p^k ∣ m) : p ∣ m :=
by rw ←nat.pow_one p; exact pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hk hpk
lemma eq_of_dvd_of_div_eq_one {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b / a = 1) : a = b :=
by rw [←nat.div_mul_cancel w, h, one_mul]
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b / a = 0) : b = 0 :=
by rw [←nat.div_mul_cancel w, h, zero_mul]
/-- If a small natural number is divisible by a larger natural number,
the small number is zero. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b < a) : b = 0 :=
nat.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero w
((nat.div_eq_zero_iff (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le b) h)).elim_right h)
lemma div_le_div_left {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : c ≤ b) (h₂ : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c :=
(nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ h₂).2 $
le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ h₁) (div_mul_le_self _ _)
lemma div_eq_self {a b : ℕ} : a / b = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 1 :=
begin
split,
{ intro,
cases b,
{ simp * at * },
{ cases b,
{ right, refl },
{ left,
have : a / (b + 2) ≤ a / 2 := div_le_div_left (by simp) dec_trivial,
refine eq_zero_of_le_half _,
simp * at * } } },
{ rintros (rfl|rfl); simp }
end
end div
lemma exists_eq_add_of_le : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → ∃ k : ℕ, n = m + k
| 0 0 h := ⟨0, by simp⟩
| 0 (n+1) h := ⟨n+1, by simp⟩
| (m+1) (n+1) h :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_eq_add_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) in
⟨k, by simp [hk, add_comm, add_left_comm]⟩
lemma exists_eq_add_of_lt : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m < n → ∃ k : ℕ, n = m + k + 1
| 0 0 h := false.elim $ lt_irrefl _ h
| 0 (n+1) h := ⟨n, by simp⟩
| (m+1) (n+1) h := let ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_eq_add_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) in ⟨k, by simp [hk]⟩
lemma with_bot.add_eq_zero_iff : ∀ {n m : with_bot ℕ}, n + m = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 0
| none m := iff_of_false dec_trivial (λ h, absurd h.1 dec_trivial)
| n none := iff_of_false (by cases n; exact dec_trivial)
(λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial)
| (some n) (some m) := show (n + m : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ) ↔ (n : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ) ∧
(m : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ),
by rw [← with_bot.coe_add, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe, add_eq_zero_iff' (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)]
lemma with_bot.add_eq_one_iff : ∀ {n m : with_bot ℕ}, n + m = 1 ↔ (n = 0 ∧ m = 1) ∨ (n = 1 ∧ m = 0)
| none none := dec_trivial
| none (some m) := dec_trivial
| (some n) none := iff_of_false dec_trivial (λ h, h.elim (λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial)
(λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial))
| (some n) (some 0) := by erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe]; simp
| (some n) (some (m + 1)) := by erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe]; simp [nat.add_succ, nat.succ_inj', nat.succ_ne_zero]
@[simp] lemma with_bot.coe_nonneg {n : ℕ} : 0 ≤ (n : with_bot ℕ) :=
by rw [← with_bot.coe_zero, with_bot.coe_le_coe]; exact nat.zero_le _
@[simp] lemma with_bot.lt_zero_iff (n : with_bot ℕ) : n < 0 ↔ n = ⊥ :=
option.cases_on n dec_trivial (λ n, iff_of_false
(by simp [with_bot.some_eq_coe]) (λ h, option.no_confusion h))
-- induction
/-- Induction principle starting at a non-zero number. For maps to a `Sort*` see `le_rec_on`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma le_induction {P : nat → Prop} {m} (h0 : P m) (h1 : ∀ n, m ≤ n → P n → P (n + 1)) :
∀ n, m ≤ n → P n :=
by apply nat.less_than_or_equal.rec h0; exact h1
/-- Decreasing induction: if `P (k+1)` implies `P k`, then `P n` implies `P m` for all `m ≤ n`.
Also works for functions to `Sort*`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def decreasing_induction {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n)
(hP : P n) : P m :=
le_rec_on mn (λ k ih hsk, ih $ h k hsk) (λ h, h) hP
@[simp] lemma decreasing_induction_self {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {n : ℕ}
(nn : n ≤ n) (hP : P n) : (decreasing_induction h nn hP : P n) = hP :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_self] }
lemma decreasing_induction_succ {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n)
(msn : m ≤ n + 1) (hP : P (n+1)) :
(decreasing_induction h msn hP : P m) = decreasing_induction h mn (h n hP) :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_succ] }
@[simp] lemma decreasing_induction_succ' {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m : ℕ}
(msm : m ≤ m + 1) (hP : P (m+1)) : (decreasing_induction h msm hP : P m) = h m hP :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_succ'] }
lemma decreasing_induction_trans {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n k : ℕ}
(mn : m ≤ n) (nk : n ≤ k) (hP : P k) :
(decreasing_induction h (le_trans mn nk) hP : P m) =
decreasing_induction h mn (decreasing_induction h nk hP) :=
by { induction nk with k nk ih, rw [decreasing_induction_self],
rw [decreasing_induction_succ h (le_trans mn nk), ih, decreasing_induction_succ] }
lemma decreasing_induction_succ_left {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ}
(smn : m + 1 ≤ n) (mn : m ≤ n) (hP : P n) :
(decreasing_induction h mn hP : P m) = h m (decreasing_induction h smn hP) :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim mn (le_trans (le_succ m) smn), decreasing_induction_trans,
decreasing_induction_succ'] }
end nat
|
4ec7300c9cd7f8f337961262dcea36d3bae085a7 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/data/finset/card.lean | ffd13c0b7bb32cf9a35ac76914ddc01d5a737301 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,909 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import data.finset.basic
import tactic.by_contra
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `finset.card`: `s.card : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `finset.strong_induction`: Strong induction
* `finset.strong_induction_on`
* `finset.strong_downward_induction`
* `finset.strong_downward_induction_on`
* `finset.case_strong_induction_on`
## TODO
Should we add a noncomputable version?
-/
open function multiset nat
variables {α β : Type*}
namespace finset
variables {s t : finset α} {a : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality. -/
def card (s : finset α) : ℕ := s.1.card
lemma card_def (s : finset α) : s.card = s.1.card := rfl
@[simp] lemma card_mk {m nodup} : (⟨m, nodup⟩ : finset α).card = m.card := rfl
@[simp] lemma card_empty : card (∅ : finset α) = 0 := rfl
lemma card_le_of_subset : s ⊆ t → s.card ≤ t.card := multiset.card_le_of_le ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
@[mono] lemma card_mono : monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_of_subset
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : s.card = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_pos : 0 < s.card ↔ s.nonempty :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans $ (not_congr card_eq_zero).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias finset.card_pos ↔ _ finset.nonempty.card_pos
lemma card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s.card ≠ 0 := (not_congr card_eq_zero).2 $ ne_empty_of_mem h
@[simp] lemma card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : finset α) = 1 := card_singleton _
lemma card_singleton_inter [decidable_eq α] : ({a} ∩ s).card ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases (finset.decidable_mem a s),
{ simp [finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h] },
{ simp [finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h] }
end
@[simp] lemma card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).card = s.card + 1 := card_cons _ _
section insert_erase
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).card = s.card + 1 :=
by rw [←cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
lemma card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : card (insert a s) = s.card := by rw insert_eq_of_mem h
lemma card_insert_le (a : α) (s : finset α) : card (insert a s) ≤ s.card + 1 :=
by by_cases a ∈ s; [{rw insert_eq_of_mem h, exact nat.le_succ _ }, rw card_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
lemma card_insert_eq_ite : card (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.card else s.card + 1 :=
begin
by_cases h : a ∈ s,
{ rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h] },
{ rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h] }
end
@[simp]
lemma card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card = pred s.card := card_erase_of_mem
@[simp] lemma card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card + 1 = s.card := card_erase_add_one
lemma card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card < s.card := card_erase_lt_of_mem
lemma card_erase_le : (s.erase a).card ≤ s.card := card_erase_le
lemma pred_card_le_card_erase : s.card - 1 ≤ (s.erase a).card :=
begin
by_cases h : a ∈ s,
{ exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge },
{ rw erase_eq_of_not_mem h,
exact nat.sub_le _ _ }
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
lemma card_erase_eq_ite : (s.erase a).card = if a ∈ s then pred s.card else s.card :=
card_erase_eq_ite
end insert_erase
@[simp] lemma card_range (n : ℕ) : (range n).card = n := card_range n
@[simp] lemma card_attach : s.attach.card = s.card := multiset.card_attach
end finset
section to_list_multiset
variables [decidable_eq α] (m : multiset α) (l : list α)
lemma multiset.card_to_finset : m.to_finset.card = m.erase_dup.card := rfl
lemma multiset.to_finset_card_le : m.to_finset.card ≤ m.card := card_le_of_le $ erase_dup_le _
lemma multiset.to_finset_card_of_nodup {m : multiset α} (h : m.nodup) : m.to_finset.card = m.card :=
congr_arg card $ multiset.erase_dup_eq_self.mpr h
lemma list.card_to_finset : l.to_finset.card = l.erase_dup.length := rfl
lemma list.to_finset_card_le : l.to_finset.card ≤ l.length := multiset.to_finset_card_le ⟦l⟧
lemma list.to_finset_card_of_nodup {l : list α} (h : l.nodup) : l.to_finset.card = l.length :=
multiset.to_finset_card_of_nodup h
end to_list_multiset
namespace finset
variables {s t : finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma length_to_list (s : finset α) : s.to_list.length = s.card :=
by { rw [to_list, ←multiset.coe_card, multiset.coe_to_list], refl }
lemma card_image_le [decidable_eq β] : (s.image f).card ≤ s.card :=
by simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).to_finset_card_le
lemma card_image_of_inj_on [decidable_eq β] (H : set.inj_on f s) : (s.image f).card = s.card :=
by simp only [card, image_val_of_inj_on H, card_map]
lemma inj_on_of_card_image_eq [decidable_eq β] (H : (s.image f).card = s.card) : set.inj_on f s :=
begin
change (s.1.map f).erase_dup.card = s.1.card at H,
have : (s.1.map f).erase_dup = s.1.map f,
{ refine multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (multiset.erase_dup_le _) _,
rw H,
simp only [multiset.card_map] },
rw multiset.erase_dup_eq_self at this,
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this,
end
lemma card_image_eq_iff_inj_on [decidable_eq β] : (s.image f).card = s.card ↔ set.inj_on f s :=
⟨inj_on_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_inj_on⟩
lemma card_image_of_injective [decidable_eq β] (s : finset α) (H : injective f) :
(s.image f).card = s.card :=
card_image_of_inj_on $ λ x _ y _ h, H h
lemma fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : finset α) (f : α → β) [decidable_eq β] (y : β) :
(s.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f :=
by { rw [←pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image] }
@[simp] lemma card_map (f : α ↪ β) : (s.map f).card = s.card := multiset.card_map _ _
@[simp] lemma card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : finset α) :
(s.subtype p).card = (s.filter p).card :=
by simp [finset.subtype]
lemma card_filter_le (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
(s.filter p).card ≤ s.card :=
card_le_of_subset $ filter_subset _ _
lemma eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t.card ≤ s.card) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq $ multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
lemma map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
lemma filter_card_eq {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (h : (s.filter p).card = s.card) (x : α)
(hx : x ∈ s) :
p x :=
begin
rw [←eq_of_subset_of_card_le (s.filter_subset p) h.ge, mem_filter] at hx,
exact hx.2,
end
lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : s.card < t.card := card_lt_of_lt $ val_lt_iff.2 h
lemma card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s) (f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n)
(hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) :
s.card = n :=
begin
classical,
have : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ ∃ i (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a,
from λ a, ⟨λ ha, let ⟨i, hi, eq⟩ := hf a ha in ⟨i, mem_range.2 hi, eq⟩,
λ ⟨i, hi, eq⟩, eq ▸ hf' i (mem_range.1 hi)⟩,
have : s = ((range n).attach.image $ λi, f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)),
by simpa only [ext_iff, mem_image, exists_prop, subtype.exists, mem_attach, true_and],
calc s.card = card ((range n).attach.image $ λ i, f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)) :
by rw this
... = card ((range n).attach) :
card_image_of_injective _ $ λ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq,
subtype.eq $ f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
... = card (range n) : card_attach
... = n : card_range n
end
lemma card_congr {t : finset β} (f : Π a ∈ s, β) (h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) :
s.card = t.card :=
by classical;
calc s.card = s.attach.card : card_attach.symm
... = (s.attach.image (λ (a : {a // a ∈ s}), f a.1 a.2)).card
: eq.symm (card_image_of_injective _ $ λ a b h, subtype.eq $ h₂ _ _ _ _ h)
... = t.card : congr_arg card (finset.ext $ λ b,
⟨λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_image.1 h in ha₂ ▸ h₁ _ _,
λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := h₃ b h in mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, by simp [ha₂]⟩⟩)
lemma card_le_card_of_inj_on {t : finset β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(f_inj : ∀ a₁ ∈ s, ∀ a₂ ∈ s, f a₁ = f a₂ → a₁ = a₂) :
s.card ≤ t.card :=
by classical;
calc s.card = (s.image f).card : (card_image_of_inj_on f_inj).symm
... ≤ t.card : card_le_of_subset $ image_subset_iff.2 hf
/-- If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons in the same pigeonhole.
-/
lemma exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {t : finset β} (hc : t.card < s.card)
{f : α → β} (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) :
∃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y :=
begin
classical,
by_contra' hz,
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_inj_on f hf _),
intros x hx y hy, contrapose, exact hz x hx y hy,
end
lemma le_card_of_inj_on_range (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ (i < n) (j < n), f i = f j → i = j) :
n ≤ s.card :=
calc n = card (range n) : (card_range n).symm
... ≤ s.card : card_le_card_of_inj_on f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa only [mem_range])
lemma surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le {t : finset β} (f : Π a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.card ≤ s.card) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha :=
begin
classical,
intros b hb,
have h : (s.attach.image $ λ (a : {a // a ∈ s}), f a a.prop).card = s.card,
{ exact @card_attach _ s ▸ card_image_of_injective _
(λ ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ h, subtype.eq $ hinj _ _ _ _ h) },
have h' : image (λ a : {a // a ∈ s}, f a a.prop) s.attach = t,
{ exact eq_of_subset_of_card_le (λ b h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_image.1 h in
ha₂ ▸ hf _ _) (by simp [hst, h]) },
rw ←h' at hb,
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_image.1 hb,
exact ⟨a, a.2, ha₂.symm⟩,
end
lemma inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le {t : finset β} (f : Π a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha) (hst : s.card ≤ t.card) ⦃a₁ a₂⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s)
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂: f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) :
a₁ = a₂ :=
by haveI : inhabited {x // x ∈ s} := ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁⟩⟩; exact
let f' : {x // x ∈ s} → {x // x ∈ t} := λ x, ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf x.1 x.2⟩ in
let g : {x // x ∈ t} → {x // x ∈ s} :=
@surj_inv _ _ f'
(λ x, let ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ := hsurj x.1 x.2 in ⟨⟨y, hy₁⟩, subtype.eq hy₂.symm⟩) in
have hg : injective g, from injective_surj_inv _,
have hsg : surjective g, from λ x,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (λ (x : {x // x ∈ t}) (hx : x ∈ t.attach), g x)
(λ x _, show (g x) ∈ s.attach, from mem_attach _ _)
(λ x y _ _ hxy, hg hxy) (by simpa) x (mem_attach _ _) in
⟨y, hy.snd.symm⟩,
have hif : injective f',
from (left_inverse_of_surjective_of_right_inverse hsg
(right_inverse_surj_inv _)).injective,
subtype.ext_iff_val.1 (@hif ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (subtype.eq ha₁a₂))
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section lattice
variables [decidable_eq α]
lemma card_union_add_card_inter (s t : finset α) : (s ∪ t).card + (s ∩ t).card = s.card + t.card :=
finset.induction_on t (by simp) $ λ a r har, by by_cases a ∈ s; simp *; cc
lemma card_union_le (s t : finset α) : (s ∪ t).card ≤ s.card + t.card :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ nat.le_add_right _ _
lemma card_union_eq (h : disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card :=
by rw [←card_union_add_card_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 h, card_empty, add_zero]
@[simp] lemma card_disjoint_union (h : disjoint s t) : card (s ∪ t) = s.card + t.card :=
by rw [←card_union_add_card_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 h, card_empty, add_zero]
lemma card_sdiff (h : s ⊆ t) : card (t \ s) = t.card - s.card :=
suffices card (t \ s) = card ((t \ s) ∪ s) - s.card, by rwa sdiff_union_of_subset h at this,
by rw [card_disjoint_union sdiff_disjoint, add_tsub_cancel_right]
lemma card_sdiff_add_card : (s \ t).card + t.card = (s ∪ t).card :=
by rw [←card_disjoint_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
end lattice
lemma filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
(s.filter p).card + (s.filter (not ∘ p)).card = s.card :=
by { classical, simp [←card_union_eq, filter_union_filter_neg_eq, disjoint_filter] }
/-- Given a set `A` and a set `B` inside it, we can shrink `A` to any appropriate size, and keep `B`
inside it. -/
lemma exists_intermediate_set {A B : finset α} (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i + card B ≤ card A) (h₂ : B ⊆ A) :
∃ (C : finset α), B ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A ∧ card C = i + card B :=
begin
classical,
rcases nat.le.dest h₁ with ⟨k, _⟩,
clear h₁,
induction k with k ih generalizing A,
{ exact ⟨A, h₂, subset.refl _, h.symm⟩ },
have : (A \ B).nonempty,
{ rw [←card_pos, card_sdiff h₂, ←h, nat.add_right_comm,
add_tsub_cancel_right, nat.add_succ],
apply nat.succ_pos },
rcases this with ⟨a, ha⟩,
have z : i + card B + k = card (erase A a),
{ rw [card_erase_of_mem, ←h, nat.add_succ, nat.pred_succ],
rw mem_sdiff at ha,
exact ha.1 },
rcases ih _ z with ⟨B', hB', B'subA', cards⟩,
{ exact ⟨B', hB', trans B'subA' (erase_subset _ _), cards⟩ },
{ rintro t th,
apply mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem _ (h₂ th),
rintro rfl,
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right th ha }
end
/-- We can shrink `A` to any smaller size. -/
lemma exists_smaller_set (A : finset α) (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i ≤ card A) :
∃ (B : finset α), B ⊆ A ∧ card B = i :=
let ⟨B, _, x₁, x₂⟩ := exists_intermediate_set i (by simpa) (empty_subset A) in ⟨B, x₁, x₂⟩
lemma exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card [decidable_eq α] {X Y : finset α} {n : ℕ}
(hXY : 2 * n < (X ∪ Y).card) :
∃ C : finset α, n < C.card ∧ (C ⊆ X ∨ C ⊆ Y) :=
begin
have h₁ : (X ∩ (Y \ X)).card = 0 := finset.card_eq_zero.mpr (finset.inter_sdiff_self X Y),
have h₂ : (X ∪ Y).card = X.card + (Y \ X).card,
{ rw [←card_union_add_card_inter X (Y \ X), finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union, h₁, add_zero] },
rw [h₂, two_mul] at hXY,
rcases lt_or_lt_of_add_lt_add hXY with h|h,
{ exact ⟨X, h, or.inl (finset.subset.refl X)⟩ },
{ exact ⟨Y \ X, h, or.inr (finset.sdiff_subset Y X)⟩ }
end
/-! ### Explicit description of a finset from its card -/
lemma card_eq_one : s.card = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} :=
by cases s; simp only [multiset.card_eq_one, finset.card, ←val_inj, singleton_val]
lemma card_le_one : s.card ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s), a = b :=
begin
obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty,
{ simp },
refine (nat.succ_le_of_lt (card_pos.2 ⟨x, hx⟩)).le_iff_eq.trans (card_eq_one.trans ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩,
simp },
{ exact λ h, ⟨x, eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨hx, λ y hy, h _ hy _ hx⟩⟩ }
end
lemma card_le_one_iff : s.card ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by { rw card_le_one, tauto }
lemma card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton [nonempty α] : s.card ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ (x : α), s ⊆ {x} :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, _, _⟩,
{ obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty,
{ exact ⟨classical.arbitrary α, empty_subset _⟩ },
{ exact ⟨x, λ y hy, by rw [card_le_one.1 H y hy x hx, mem_singleton]⟩ } },
{ rintro ⟨x, hx⟩,
rw ←card_singleton x,
exact card_le_of_subset hx }
end
/-- A `finset` of a subsingleton type has cardinality at most one. -/
lemma card_le_one_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] (s : finset α) : s.card ≤ 1 :=
finset.card_le_one_iff.2 $ λ _ _ _ _, subsingleton.elim _ _
lemma one_lt_card : 1 < s.card ↔ ∃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s), a ≠ b :=
by { rw ←not_iff_not, push_neg, exact card_le_one }
lemma one_lt_card_iff : 1 < s.card ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b :=
by { rw one_lt_card, simp only [exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left] }
lemma two_lt_card_iff : 2 < s.card ↔ ∃ a b c, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ c ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c :=
begin
classical,
refine ⟨λ h, _, _⟩,
{ obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := card_pos.mp (zero_lt_two.trans h),
have : 1 < (s.erase c).card := by rwa [←add_lt_add_iff_right 1, card_erase_add_one hc],
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab⟩ := one_lt_card_iff.mp this,
exact ⟨a, b, c, mem_of_mem_erase ha, mem_of_mem_erase hb, hc,
hab, ne_of_mem_erase ha, ne_of_mem_erase hb⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, hab, hac, hbc⟩,
rw [←card_erase_add_one hc, ←card_erase_add_one (mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hbc hb),
←card_erase_add_one (mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hab (mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hac ha))],
apply nat.le_add_left },
end
lemma two_lt_card : 2 < s.card ↔ ∃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s) (c ∈ s), a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c :=
by simp_rw [two_lt_card_iff, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left]
lemma exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (hs : 1 < s.card) (a : α) : ∃ b, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ a :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := finset.one_lt_card.mp hs,
by_cases ha : y = a,
{ exact ⟨x, hx, ne_of_ne_of_eq hxy ha⟩ },
{ exact ⟨y, hy, ha⟩ }
end
lemma card_eq_succ [decidable_eq α] :
s.card = n + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.card = n) :=
⟨λ eq,
let ⟨a, has⟩ := card_pos.mp (eq.symm ▸ nat.zero_lt_succ _ : 0 < s.card) in
⟨a, s.erase a, s.not_mem_erase a, insert_erase has,
by simp only [eq, card_erase_of_mem has, pred_succ]⟩,
λ ⟨a, t, hat, s_eq, n_eq⟩, s_eq ▸ n_eq ▸ card_insert_of_not_mem hat⟩
lemma card_eq_two [decidable_eq α] : s.card = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} :=
begin
split,
{ rw card_eq_succ,
simp_rw [card_eq_one],
rintro ⟨a, _, hab, rfl, b, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨a, b, not_mem_singleton.1 hab, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩,
simp only [hxy, card_insert_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, mem_singleton, card_singleton] }
end
lemma card_eq_three [decidable_eq α] :
s.card = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} :=
begin
split,
{ rw card_eq_succ,
simp_rw [card_eq_two],
rintro ⟨a, _, abc, rfl, b, c, bc, rfl⟩,
rw [mem_insert, mem_singleton, not_or_distrib] at abc,
exact ⟨a, b, c, abc.1, abc.2, bc, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨x, y, z, xy, xz, yz, rfl⟩,
simp only [xy, xz, yz, mem_insert, card_insert_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, mem_singleton,
or_self, card_singleton] }
end
/-! ### Inductions -/
/-- Suppose that, given objects defined on all strict subsets of any finset `s`, one knows how to
define an object on `s`. Then one can inductively define an object on all finsets, starting from
the empty set and iterating. This can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strong_induction {p : finset α → Sort*} (H : ∀ s, (∀ t ⊂ s, p t) → p s) :
∀ (s : finset α), p s
| s := H s (λ t h, have t.card < s.card, from card_lt_card h, strong_induction t)
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf card⟩]}
lemma strong_induction_eq {p : finset α → Sort*} (H : ∀ s, (∀ t ⊂ s, p t) → p s) (s : finset α) :
strong_induction H s = H s (λ t h, strong_induction H t) :=
by rw strong_induction
/-- Analogue of `strong_induction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def strong_induction_on {p : finset α → Sort*} (s : finset α) :
(∀ s, (∀ t ⊂ s, p t) → p s) → p s :=
λ H, strong_induction H s
lemma strong_induction_on_eq {p : finset α → Sort*} (s : finset α) (H : ∀ s, (∀ t ⊂ s, p t) → p s) :
s.strong_induction_on H = H s (λ t h, t.strong_induction_on H) :=
by { dunfold strong_induction_on, rw strong_induction }
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma case_strong_induction_on [decidable_eq α] {p : finset α → Prop}
(s : finset α) (h₀ : p ∅) (h₁ : ∀ a s, a ∉ s → (∀ t ⊆ s, p t) → p (insert a s)) :
p s :=
finset.strong_induction_on s $ λ s,
finset.induction_on s (λ _, h₀) $ λ a s n _ ih, h₁ a s n $
λ t ss, ih _ (lt_of_le_of_lt ss (ssubset_insert n) : t < _)
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all finsets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from finsets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strong_downward_induction {p : finset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : finset α},
t₂.card ≤ n → t₁ ⊂ t₂ → p t₂) → t₁.card ≤ n → p t₁) :
∀ (s : finset α), s.card ≤ n → p s
| s := H s (λ t ht h, have n - t.card < n - s.card,
from (tsub_lt_tsub_iff_left_of_le ht).2 (finset.card_lt_card h),
strong_downward_induction t ht)
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf (λ (t : finset α), n - t.card)⟩]}
lemma strong_downward_induction_eq {p : finset α → Sort*}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : finset α}, t₂.card ≤ n → t₁ ⊂ t₂ → p t₂) → t₁.card ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : finset α) :
strong_downward_induction H s = H s (λ t ht hst, strong_downward_induction H t ht) :=
by rw strong_downward_induction
/-- Analogue of `strong_downward_induction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def strong_downward_induction_on {p : finset α → Sort*} (s : finset α)
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : finset α}, t₂.card ≤ n → t₁ ⊂ t₂ → p t₂) → t₁.card ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.card ≤ n → p s :=
strong_downward_induction H s
lemma strong_downward_induction_on_eq {p : finset α → Sort*} (s : finset α) (H : ∀ t₁,
(∀ {t₂ : finset α}, t₂.card ≤ n → t₁ ⊂ t₂ → p t₂) → t₁.card ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strong_downward_induction_on H = H s (λ t ht h, t.strong_downward_induction_on H ht) :=
by { dunfold strong_downward_induction_on, rw strong_downward_induction }
lemma lt_wf {α} : well_founded (@has_lt.lt (finset α) _) :=
have H : subrelation (@has_lt.lt (finset α) _)
(inv_image ( < ) card),
from λ x y hxy, card_lt_card hxy,
subrelation.wf H $ inv_image.wf _ $ nat.lt_wf
end finset
|
ca0840458e190be82ac9fdc206e238f6f7fd30d5 | 61ccc57f9d72048e493dd6969b56ebd7f0a8f9e8 | /src/analysis/calculus/deriv.lean | 007caa880ab2ccc7ff7fd1fde31cd7c89bc3b939 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jtristan/mathlib | 375b3c8682975df28f79f53efcb7c88840118467 | 8fa8f175271320d675277a672f59ec53abd62f10 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,072,765,551 | 1,588,255,641,000 | 1,588,255,641,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 65,427 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.calculus.fderiv
import data.polynomial
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives
This file defines the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` where `𝕜` is a
normed field and `F` is a normed space over this field. The derivative of
such a function `f` at a point `x` is given by an element `f' : F`.
The theory is developed analogously to the [Fréchet
derivatives](./fderiv.lean). We first introduce predicates defined in terms
of the corresponding predicates for Fréchet derivatives:
- `has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
- `has_deriv_within_at f f' s x` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
- `has_deriv_at f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x`.
- `has_strict_deriv_at f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability, i.e.,
`f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o (y - z)` as `y, z → x`.
For the last two notions we also define a functional version:
- `deriv_within f s x` is a derivative of `f` at `x` within `s`. If the
derivative does not exist, then `deriv_within f s x` equals zero.
- `deriv f x` is a derivative of `f` at `x`. If the derivative does not
exist, then `deriv f x` equals zero.
The theorems `fderiv_within_deriv_within` and `fderiv_deriv` show that the
one-dimensional derivatives coincide with the general Fréchet derivatives.
We also show the existence and compute the derivatives of:
- constants
- the identity function
- linear maps
- addition
- negation
- subtraction
- multiplication
- inverse `x → x⁻¹`
- multiplication of two functions in `𝕜 → 𝕜`
- multiplication of a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` and of a function in `𝕜 → E`
- composition of a function in `𝕜 → F` with a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜`
- composition of a function in `F → E` with a function in `𝕜 → F`
- inverse function (assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `inverse.lean`)
- division
- polynomials
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `has_deriv_at`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
We set up the simplifier so that it can compute the derivative of simple functions. For instance,
```lean
example (x : ℝ) : deriv (λ x, cos (sin x) * exp x) x = (cos(sin(x))-sin(sin(x))*cos(x))*exp(x) :=
by { simp, ring }
```
## Implementation notes
Most of the theorems are direct restatements of the corresponding theorems
for Fréchet derivatives.
The strategy to construct simp lemmas that give the simplifier the possibility to compute
derivatives is the same as the one for differentiability statements, as explained in `fderiv.lean`.
See the explanations there.
-/
universes u v w
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space
open filter asymptotics set
open continuous_linear_map (smul_right smul_right_one_eq_iff)
set_option class.instance_max_depth 100
variables {𝕜 : Type u} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
section
variables {F : Type v} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
variables {E : Type w} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
/--
`f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges along the filter `L`.
-/
def has_deriv_at_filter (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) (L : filter 𝕜) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter f (smul_right 1 f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) x L
/--
`f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def has_deriv_within_at (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (s : set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x (nhds_within x s)
/--
`f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def has_deriv_at (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability.
That is, `f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. -/
def has_strict_deriv_at (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
has_strict_fderiv_at f (smul_right 1 f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) x
/--
Derivative of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', has_deriv_within_at f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv_within f s x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def deriv_within (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
(fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) 1
/--
Derivative of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', has_deriv_at f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv f x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def deriv (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) :=
(fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) 1
variables {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variables {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variables {x : 𝕜}
variables {s t : set 𝕜}
variables {L L₁ L₂ : filter 𝕜}
/-- Expressing `has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L` in terms of `has_deriv_at_filter` -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_has_deriv_at_filter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L ↔ has_deriv_at_filter f (f' 1) x L :=
by simp [has_deriv_at_filter]
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.has_deriv_at_filter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L → has_deriv_at_filter f (f' 1) x L :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_has_deriv_at_filter.mp
/-- Expressing `has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x` in terms of `has_deriv_within_at` -/
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_iff_has_deriv_within_at {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x ↔ has_deriv_within_at f (f' 1) s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_has_deriv_at_filter
/-- Expressing `has_deriv_within_at f f' s x` in terms of `has_fderiv_within_at` -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at_iff_has_fderiv_within_at {f' : F} :
has_deriv_within_at f f' s x ↔
has_fderiv_within_at f (smul_right 1 f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iff.rfl
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.has_deriv_within_at {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x → has_deriv_within_at f (f' 1) s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at_iff_has_deriv_within_at.mp
/-- Expressing `has_fderiv_at f f' x` in terms of `has_deriv_at` -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_iff_has_deriv_at {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_at f f' x ↔ has_deriv_at f (f' 1) x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_has_deriv_at_filter
lemma has_fderiv_at.has_deriv_at {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_at f f' x → has_deriv_at f (f' 1) x :=
has_fderiv_at_iff_has_deriv_at.mp
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_iff_has_strict_deriv_at {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x ↔ has_strict_deriv_at f (f' 1) x :=
by simp [has_strict_deriv_at, has_strict_fderiv_at]
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.has_strict_deriv_at {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x → has_strict_deriv_at f (f' 1) x :=
has_strict_fderiv_at_iff_has_strict_deriv_at.mp
/-- Expressing `has_deriv_at f f' x` in terms of `has_fderiv_at` -/
lemma has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at {f' : F} :
has_deriv_at f f' x ↔
has_fderiv_at f (smul_right 1 f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iff.rfl
lemma deriv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at
(h : ¬ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) : deriv_within f s x = 0 :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at, simp, assumption }
lemma deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at (h : ¬ differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) : deriv f x = 0 :=
by { unfold deriv, rw fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at, simp, assumption }
theorem unique_diff_within_at.eq_deriv (s : set 𝕜) (H : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (h₁ : has_deriv_within_at f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
smul_right_one_eq_iff.mp $ unique_diff_within_at.eq H h h₁
theorem has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto :
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L ↔
tendsto (λ x' : 𝕜, ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'∥) L (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'∥) (nhds_within x s) (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_deriv_at_iff_tendsto : has_deriv_at f f' x ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.has_deriv_at (h : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at f f' x :=
h.has_fderiv_at
/-- If the domain has dimension one, then Fréchet derivative is equivalent to the classical
definition with a limit. In this version we have to take the limit along the subset `-{x}`,
because for `y=x` the slope equals zero due to the convention `0⁻¹=0`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto_slope {x : 𝕜} {L : filter 𝕜} :
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L ↔
tendsto (λ y, (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)) (L ⊓ principal (-{x})) (𝓝 f') :=
begin
conv_lhs { simp only [has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto, (normed_field.norm_inv _).symm,
(norm_smul _ _).symm, tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.symm] },
conv_rhs { rw [← nhds_translation f', tendsto_comap_iff] },
refine (tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq $ by simp).symm.trans (tendsto_congr' _),
rw mem_inf_principal,
refine univ_mem_sets' (λ z hz, _),
have : z ≠ x, by simpa [function.comp] using hz,
simp only [mem_set_of_eq],
rw [smul_sub, ← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel (sub_ne_zero.2 this), one_smul]
end
lemma has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜} :
has_deriv_within_at f f' s x ↔
tendsto (λ y, (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)) (nhds_within x (s \ {x})) (𝓝 f') :=
begin
simp only [has_deriv_within_at, nhds_within, diff_eq, inf_assoc.symm, inf_principal.symm],
exact has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto_slope
end
lemma has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope' {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜} (hs : x ∉ s) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' s x ↔
tendsto (λ y, (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)) (nhds_within x s) (𝓝 f') :=
begin
convert ← has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope,
exact diff_singleton_eq_self hs
end
lemma has_deriv_at_iff_tendsto_slope {x : 𝕜} :
has_deriv_at f f' x ↔
tendsto (λ y, (y - x)⁻¹ • (f y - f x)) (nhds_within x (-{x})) (𝓝 f') :=
has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto_slope
theorem has_deriv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero : has_deriv_at f f' x ↔
is_o (λh, f (x + h) - f x - h • f') (λh, h) (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.mono (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L₁ :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.mono h hst
theorem has_deriv_within_at.mono (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.mono h hst
theorem has_deriv_at.has_deriv_at_filter (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L :=
has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_at_filter h hL
theorem has_deriv_at.has_deriv_within_at
(h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x :=
has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_within_at h
lemma has_deriv_within_at.differentiable_within_at (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.differentiable_within_at h
lemma has_deriv_at.differentiable_at (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at h
@[simp] lemma has_deriv_within_at_univ : has_deriv_within_at f f' univ x ↔ has_deriv_at f f' x :=
has_fderiv_within_at_univ
theorem has_deriv_at_unique
(h₀ : has_deriv_at f f₀' x) (h₁ : has_deriv_at f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' :=
smul_right_one_eq_iff.mp $ has_fderiv_at_unique h₀ h₁
lemma has_deriv_within_at_inter' (h : t ∈ nhds_within x s) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ has_deriv_within_at f f' s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at_inter' h
lemma has_deriv_within_at_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ has_deriv_within_at f f' s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at_inter h
lemma has_deriv_within_at.union (hs : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (ht : has_deriv_within_at f f' t x) :
has_deriv_within_at f f' (s ∪ t) x :=
begin
simp only [has_deriv_within_at, nhds_within_union],
exact hs.join ht,
end
lemma has_deriv_within_at.nhds_within (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x)
(ht : s ∈ nhds_within x t) : has_deriv_within_at f f' t x :=
(has_deriv_within_at_inter' ht).1 (h.mono (inter_subset_right _ _))
lemma has_deriv_within_at.has_deriv_at (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
has_deriv_at f f' x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.has_fderiv_at h hs
lemma differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
has_deriv_within_at f (deriv_within f s x) s x :=
show has_fderiv_within_at _ _ _ _, by { convert h.has_fderiv_within_at, simp [deriv_within] }
lemma differentiable_at.has_deriv_at (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) : has_deriv_at f (deriv f x) x :=
show has_fderiv_at _ _ _, by { convert h.has_fderiv_at, simp [deriv] }
lemma has_deriv_at.deriv (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : deriv f x = f' :=
has_deriv_at_unique h.differentiable_at.has_deriv_at h
lemma has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within
(h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within f s x = f' :=
hxs.eq_deriv _ h.differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at h
lemma fderiv_within_deriv_within : (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = deriv_within f s x :=
rfl
lemma deriv_within_fderiv_within :
smul_right 1 (deriv_within f s x) = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
by simp [deriv_within]
lemma fderiv_deriv : (fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = deriv f x :=
rfl
lemma deriv_fderiv :
smul_right 1 (deriv f x) = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
by simp [deriv]
lemma differentiable_at.deriv_within (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) : deriv_within f s x = deriv f x :=
by { unfold deriv_within deriv, rw h.fderiv_within hxs }
lemma deriv_within_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f t x) :
deriv_within f s x = deriv_within f t x :=
((differentiable_within_at.has_deriv_within_at h).mono st).deriv_within ht
@[simp] lemma deriv_within_univ : deriv_within f univ = deriv f :=
by { ext, unfold deriv_within deriv, rw fderiv_within_univ }
lemma deriv_within_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within f (s ∩ t) x = deriv_within f s x :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_inter ht hs }
section congr
/-! ### Congruence properties of derivatives -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter_congr_of_mem_sets
(hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₀ : ∀ᶠ x in L, f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : f₀' = f₁') :
has_deriv_at_filter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ has_deriv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_congr_of_mem_sets hx h₀ (by simp [h₁])
lemma has_deriv_at_filter.congr_of_mem_sets (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L)
(hL : ∀ᶠ x in L, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_deriv_at_filter f₁ f' x L :=
by rwa has_deriv_at_filter_congr_of_mem_sets hx hL rfl
lemma has_deriv_within_at.congr_mono (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (ht : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : has_deriv_within_at f₁ f' t x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.congr_mono h ht hx h₁
lemma has_deriv_within_at.congr (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hs : ∀x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_deriv_within_at f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (subset.refl _)
lemma has_deriv_within_at.congr_of_mem_nhds_within (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x)
(h₁ : ∀ᶠ y in nhds_within x s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_deriv_within_at f₁ f' s x :=
has_deriv_at_filter.congr_of_mem_sets h h₁ hx
lemma has_deriv_at.congr_of_mem_nhds (h : has_deriv_at f f' x)
(h₁ : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f₁ y = f y) : has_deriv_at f₁ f' x :=
has_deriv_at_filter.congr_of_mem_sets h h₁ (mem_of_nhds h₁ : _)
lemma deriv_within_congr_of_mem_nhds_within (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hL : ∀ᶠ y in nhds_within x s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
deriv_within f₁ s x = deriv_within f s x :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_congr_of_mem_nhds_within hs hL hx }
lemma deriv_within_congr (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hL : ∀y∈s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
deriv_within f₁ s x = deriv_within f s x :=
by { unfold deriv_within, rw fderiv_within_congr hs hL hx }
lemma deriv_congr_of_mem_nhds (hL : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f₁ y = f y) : deriv f₁ x = deriv f x :=
by { unfold deriv, rwa fderiv_congr_of_mem_nhds }
end congr
section id
/-! ### Derivative of the identity -/
variables (s x L)
theorem has_deriv_at_filter_id : has_deriv_at_filter id 1 x L :=
(has_fderiv_at_filter_id x L).has_deriv_at_filter
theorem has_deriv_within_at_id : has_deriv_within_at id 1 s x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_id _ _
theorem has_deriv_at_id : has_deriv_at id 1 x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_id _ _
theorem has_deriv_at_id' : has_deriv_at (λ (x : 𝕜), x) 1 x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_id _ _
theorem has_strict_deriv_at_id : has_strict_deriv_at id 1 x :=
(has_strict_fderiv_at_id x).has_strict_deriv_at
lemma deriv_id : deriv id x = 1 :=
has_deriv_at.deriv (has_deriv_at_id x)
@[simp] lemma deriv_id' : deriv (@id 𝕜) = λ _, 1 :=
funext deriv_id
@[simp] lemma deriv_id'' : deriv (λ x : 𝕜, x) x = 1 :=
deriv_id x
lemma deriv_within_id (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) : deriv_within id s x = 1 :=
(has_deriv_within_at_id x s).deriv_within hxs
end id
section const
/-! ### Derivative of constant functions -/
variables (c : F) (s x L)
theorem has_deriv_at_filter_const : has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, c) 0 x L :=
(has_fderiv_at_filter_const c x L).has_deriv_at_filter
theorem has_strict_deriv_at_const : has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, c) 0 x :=
(has_strict_fderiv_at_const c x).has_strict_deriv_at
theorem has_deriv_within_at_const : has_deriv_within_at (λ x, c) 0 s x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_const _ _ _
theorem has_deriv_at_const : has_deriv_at (λ x, c) 0 x :=
has_deriv_at_filter_const _ _ _
lemma deriv_const : deriv (λ x, c) x = 0 :=
has_deriv_at.deriv (has_deriv_at_const x c)
@[simp] lemma deriv_const' : deriv (λ x:𝕜, c) = λ x, 0 :=
funext (λ x, deriv_const x c)
lemma deriv_within_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) : deriv_within (λ x, c) s x = 0 :=
(has_deriv_within_at_const _ _ _).deriv_within hxs
end const
section continuous_linear_map
/-! ### Derivative of continuous linear maps -/
variables (e : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F)
lemma continuous_linear_map.has_deriv_at_filter : has_deriv_at_filter e (e 1) x L :=
e.has_fderiv_at_filter.has_deriv_at_filter
lemma continuous_linear_map.has_strict_deriv_at : has_strict_deriv_at e (e 1) x :=
e.has_strict_fderiv_at.has_strict_deriv_at
lemma continuous_linear_map.has_deriv_at : has_deriv_at e (e 1) x :=
e.has_deriv_at_filter
lemma continuous_linear_map.has_deriv_within_at : has_deriv_within_at e (e 1) s x :=
e.has_deriv_at_filter
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.deriv : deriv e x = e 1 :=
e.has_deriv_at.deriv
lemma continuous_linear_map.deriv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within e s x = e 1 :=
e.has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within hxs
end continuous_linear_map
section linear_map
/-! ### Derivative of bundled linear maps -/
variables (e : 𝕜 →ₗ[𝕜] F)
lemma linear_map.has_deriv_at_filter : has_deriv_at_filter e (e 1) x L :=
e.to_continuous_linear_map₁.has_deriv_at_filter
lemma linear_map.has_strict_deriv_at : has_strict_deriv_at e (e 1) x :=
e.to_continuous_linear_map₁.has_strict_deriv_at
lemma linear_map.has_deriv_at : has_deriv_at e (e 1) x :=
e.has_deriv_at_filter
lemma linear_map.has_deriv_within_at : has_deriv_within_at e (e 1) s x :=
e.has_deriv_at_filter
@[simp] lemma linear_map.deriv : deriv e x = e 1 :=
e.has_deriv_at.deriv
lemma linear_map.deriv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within e s x = e 1 :=
e.has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within hxs
end linear_map
section add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.add
(hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) (hg : has_deriv_at_filter g g' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') x L :=
by simpa using (hf.add hg).has_deriv_at_filter
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.add
(hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) (hg : has_strict_deriv_at g g' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') x :=
by simpa using (hf.add hg).has_strict_deriv_at
theorem has_deriv_within_at.add
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_deriv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
theorem has_deriv_at.add
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hg : has_deriv_at g g' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
lemma deriv_within_add (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g s x) :
deriv_within (λy, f y + g y) s x = deriv_within f s x + deriv_within g s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.add hg.has_deriv_within_at).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_add
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g x) :
deriv (λy, f y + g y) x = deriv f x + deriv g x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.add hg.has_deriv_at).deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.add_const
(hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : F) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ y, f y + c) f' x L :=
add_zero f' ▸ hf.add (has_deriv_at_filter_const x L c)
theorem has_deriv_within_at.add_const
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (c : F) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, f y + c) f' s x :=
hf.add_const c
theorem has_deriv_at.add_const
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x + c) f' x :=
hf.add_const c
lemma deriv_within_add_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
deriv_within (λy, f y + c) s x = deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.add_const c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_add_const (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
deriv (λy, f y + c) x = deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.add_const c).deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.const_add (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ y, c + f y) f' x L :=
zero_add f' ▸ (has_deriv_at_filter_const x L c).add hf
theorem has_deriv_within_at.const_add (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c + f y) f' s x :=
hf.const_add c
theorem has_deriv_at.const_add (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, c + f x) f' x :=
hf.const_add c
lemma deriv_within_const_add (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(c : F) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λy, c + f y) s x = deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.const_add c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_const_add (c : F) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λy, c + f y) x = deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.const_add c).deriv
end add
section mul_vector
/-! ### Derivative of the multiplication of a scalar function and a vector function -/
variables {c : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' : 𝕜}
theorem has_deriv_within_at.smul
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c' • f x) s x :=
by simpa using (has_fderiv_within_at.smul hc hf).has_deriv_within_at
theorem has_deriv_at.smul
(hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c' • f x) x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.smul hf
end
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.smul
(hc : has_strict_deriv_at c c' x) (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c' • f x) x :=
by simpa using (hc.smul hf).has_strict_deriv_at
lemma deriv_within_smul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λ y, c y • f y) s x = c x • deriv_within f s x + (deriv_within c s x) • f x :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.smul hf.has_deriv_within_at).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_smul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ y, c y • f y) x = c x • deriv f x + (deriv c x) • f x :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.smul hf.has_deriv_at).deriv
theorem has_deriv_within_at.smul_const
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (f : F) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y • f) (c' • f) s x :=
begin
have := hc.smul (has_deriv_within_at_const x s f),
rwa [smul_zero, zero_add] at this
end
theorem has_deriv_at.smul_const
(hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (f : F) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y • f) (c' • f) x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.smul_const f
end
lemma deriv_within_smul_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (f : F) :
deriv_within (λ y, c y • f) s x = (deriv_within c s x) • f :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.smul_const f).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_smul_const (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (f : F) :
deriv (λ y, c y • f) x = (deriv c x) • f :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.smul_const f).deriv
theorem has_deriv_within_at.const_smul
(c : 𝕜) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c • f y) (c • f') s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_within_at_const x s c).smul hf,
rw [zero_smul, add_zero]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.const_smul (c : 𝕜) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c • f y) (c • f') x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hf.const_smul c
end
lemma deriv_within_const_smul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(c : 𝕜) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λ y, c • f y) s x = c • deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.const_smul c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_const_smul (c : 𝕜) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ y, c • f y) x = c • deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.const_smul c).deriv
end mul_vector
section neg
/-! ### Derivative of the negative of a function -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.neg (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, -f x) (-f') x L :=
by simpa using h.neg.has_deriv_at_filter
theorem has_deriv_within_at.neg (h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
theorem has_deriv_at.neg (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : has_deriv_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.neg (h : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') x :=
by simpa using h.neg.has_strict_deriv_at
lemma deriv_within_neg (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λy, -f y) s x = - deriv_within f s x :=
h.has_deriv_within_at.neg.deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_neg : deriv (λy, -f y) x = - deriv f x :=
if h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x then h.has_deriv_at.neg.deriv else
have ¬differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, -f y) x, from λ h', by simpa only [neg_neg] using h'.neg,
by simp only [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at h,
deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at this, neg_zero]
@[simp] lemma deriv_neg' : deriv (λy, -f y) = (λ x, - deriv f x) :=
funext $ λ x, deriv_neg
end neg
section sub
/-! ### Derivative of the difference of two functions -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.sub
(hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) (hg : has_deriv_at_filter g g' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x L :=
hf.add hg.neg
theorem has_deriv_within_at.sub
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_deriv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
hf.sub hg
theorem has_deriv_at.sub
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hg : has_deriv_at g g' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.sub hg
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.sub
(hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) (hg : has_strict_deriv_at g g' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.add hg.neg
lemma deriv_within_sub (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g s x) :
deriv_within (λy, f y - g y) s x = deriv_within f s x - deriv_within g s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.sub hg.has_deriv_within_at).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_sub
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g x) :
deriv (λ y, f y - g y) x = deriv f x - deriv g x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.sub hg.has_deriv_at).deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.is_O_sub (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
is_O (λ x', f x' - f x) (λ x', x' - x) L :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.is_O_sub h
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.sub_const
(hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : F) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, f x - c) f' x L :=
hf.add_const (-c)
theorem has_deriv_within_at.sub_const
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (c : F) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, f x - c) f' s x :=
hf.sub_const c
theorem has_deriv_at.sub_const
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, f x - c) f' x :=
hf.sub_const c
lemma deriv_within_sub_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
deriv_within (λy, f y - c) s x = deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.sub_const c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_sub_const (c : F) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ y, f y - c) x = deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.sub_const c).deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.const_sub (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, c - f x) (-f') x L :=
hf.neg.const_add c
theorem has_deriv_within_at.const_sub (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, c - f x) (-f') s x :=
hf.const_sub c
theorem has_deriv_at.const_sub (c : F) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, c - f x) (-f') x :=
hf.const_sub c
lemma deriv_within_const_sub (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(c : F) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
deriv_within (λy, c - f y) s x = -deriv_within f s x :=
(hf.has_deriv_within_at.const_sub c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_const_sub (c : F) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (λ y, c - f y) x = -deriv f x :=
(hf.has_deriv_at.const_sub c).deriv
end sub
section continuous
/-! ### Continuity of a function admitting a derivative -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds
(hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) (h : has_deriv_at_filter f f' x L) :
tendsto f L (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h.tendsto_nhds hL
theorem has_deriv_within_at.continuous_within_at
(h : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
has_deriv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds inf_le_left h
theorem has_deriv_at.continuous_at (h : has_deriv_at f f' x) : continuous_at f x :=
has_deriv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds (le_refl _) h
end continuous
section cartesian_product
/-! ### Derivative of the cartesian product of two functions -/
variables {G : Type w} [normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
variables {f₂ : 𝕜 → G} {f₂' : G}
lemma has_deriv_at_filter.prod
(hf₁ : has_deriv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L) (hf₂ : has_deriv_at_filter f₂ f₂' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (λ x, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁', f₂') x L :=
show has_fderiv_at_filter _ _ _ _,
by convert has_fderiv_at_filter.prod hf₁ hf₂
lemma has_deriv_within_at.prod
(hf₁ : has_deriv_within_at f₁ f₁' s x) (hf₂ : has_deriv_within_at f₂ f₂' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁', f₂') s x :=
hf₁.prod hf₂
lemma has_deriv_at.prod (hf₁ : has_deriv_at f₁ f₁' x) (hf₂ : has_deriv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁', f₂') x :=
hf₁.prod hf₂
end cartesian_product
section composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of a vector function and a scalar function
We use `scomp` in lemmas on composition of vector valued and scalar valued functions, and `comp`
in lemmas on composition of scalar valued functions, in analogy for `smul` and `mul` (and also
because the `comp` version with the shorter name will show up much more often in applications).
The formula for the derivative involves `smul` in `scomp` lemmas, which can be reduced to
usual multiplication in `comp` lemmas.
-/
variables {h h₁ h₂ : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {h' h₁' h₂' : 𝕜}
/- For composition lemmas, we put x explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition -/
variable (x)
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.scomp
(hg : has_deriv_at_filter g g' (h x) (L.map h))
(hh : has_deriv_at_filter h h' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (g ∘ h) (h' • g') x L :=
by simpa using (hg.comp x hh).has_deriv_at_filter
theorem has_deriv_within_at.scomp {t : set 𝕜}
(hg : has_deriv_within_at g g' t (h x))
(hh : has_deriv_within_at h h' s x) (hst : s ⊆ h ⁻¹' t) :
has_deriv_within_at (g ∘ h) (h' • g') s x :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at_filter.scomp _ (has_deriv_at_filter.mono hg _) hh,
calc map h (nhds_within x s)
≤ nhds_within (h x) (h '' s) : hh.continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image
... ≤ nhds_within (h x) t : nhds_within_mono _ (image_subset_iff.mpr hst)
end
/-- The chain rule. -/
theorem has_deriv_at.scomp
(hg : has_deriv_at g g' (h x)) (hh : has_deriv_at h h' x) :
has_deriv_at (g ∘ h) (h' • g') x :=
(hg.mono hh.continuous_at).scomp x hh
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.scomp
(hg : has_strict_deriv_at g g' (h x)) (hh : has_strict_deriv_at h h' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (g ∘ h) (h' • g') x :=
by simpa using (hg.comp x hh).has_strict_deriv_at
theorem has_deriv_at.scomp_has_deriv_within_at
(hg : has_deriv_at g g' (h x)) (hh : has_deriv_within_at h h' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (g ∘ h) (h' • g') s x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at hg,
exact has_deriv_within_at.scomp x hg hh subset_preimage_univ
end
lemma deriv_within.scomp
(hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g t (h x)) (hh : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 h s x)
(hs : s ⊆ h ⁻¹' t) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (g ∘ h) s x = deriv_within h s x • deriv_within g t (h x) :=
begin
apply has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within _ hxs,
exact has_deriv_within_at.scomp x (hg.has_deriv_within_at) (hh.has_deriv_within_at) hs
end
lemma deriv.scomp
(hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g (h x)) (hh : differentiable_at 𝕜 h x) :
deriv (g ∘ h) x = deriv h x • deriv g (h x) :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at.deriv,
exact has_deriv_at.scomp x hg.has_deriv_at hh.has_deriv_at
end
/-! ### Derivative of the composition of two scalar functions -/
theorem has_deriv_at_filter.comp
(hh₁ : has_deriv_at_filter h₁ h₁' (h₂ x) (L.map h₂))
(hh₂ : has_deriv_at_filter h₂ h₂' x L) :
has_deriv_at_filter (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') x L :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact hh₁.scomp x hh₂ }
theorem has_deriv_within_at.comp {t : set 𝕜}
(hh₁ : has_deriv_within_at h₁ h₁' t (h₂ x))
(hh₂ : has_deriv_within_at h₂ h₂' s x) (hst : s ⊆ h₂ ⁻¹' t) :
has_deriv_within_at (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') s x :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact hh₁.scomp x hh₂ hst, }
/-- The chain rule. -/
theorem has_deriv_at.comp
(hh₁ : has_deriv_at h₁ h₁' (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : has_deriv_at h₂ h₂' x) :
has_deriv_at (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') x :=
(hh₁.mono hh₂.continuous_at).comp x hh₂
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.comp
(hh₁ : has_strict_deriv_at h₁ h₁' (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : has_strict_deriv_at h₂ h₂' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') x :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact hh₁.scomp x hh₂ }
theorem has_deriv_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at
(hh₁ : has_deriv_at h₁ h₁' (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : has_deriv_within_at h₂ h₂' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (h₁ ∘ h₂) (h₁' * h₂') s x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at hh₁,
exact has_deriv_within_at.comp x hh₁ hh₂ subset_preimage_univ
end
lemma deriv_within.comp
(hh₁ : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 h₁ t (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 h₂ s x)
(hs : s ⊆ h₂ ⁻¹' t) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (h₁ ∘ h₂) s x = deriv_within h₁ t (h₂ x) * deriv_within h₂ s x :=
begin
apply has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within _ hxs,
exact has_deriv_within_at.comp x (hh₁.has_deriv_within_at) (hh₂.has_deriv_within_at) hs
end
lemma deriv.comp
(hh₁ : differentiable_at 𝕜 h₁ (h₂ x)) (hh₂ : differentiable_at 𝕜 h₂ x) :
deriv (h₁ ∘ h₂) x = deriv h₁ (h₂ x) * deriv h₂ x :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at.deriv,
exact has_deriv_at.comp x hh₁.has_deriv_at hh₂.has_deriv_at
end
end composition
section composition_vector
/-! ### Derivative of the composition of a function between vector spaces and of a function defined on `𝕜` -/
variables {l : F → E} {l' : F →L[𝕜] E}
variable (x)
/-- The composition `l ∘ f` where `l : F → E` and `f : 𝕜 → F`, has a derivative within a set
equal to the Fréchet derivative of `l` applied to the derivative of `f`. -/
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at {t : set F}
(hl : has_fderiv_within_at l l' t (f x)) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hst : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
has_deriv_within_at (l ∘ f) (l' (f')) s x :=
begin
rw has_deriv_within_at_iff_has_fderiv_within_at,
convert has_fderiv_within_at.comp x hl hf hst,
ext,
simp
end
/-- The composition `l ∘ f` where `l : F → E` and `f : 𝕜 → F`, has a derivative equal to the
Fréchet derivative of `l` applied to the derivative of `f`. -/
theorem has_fderiv_at.comp_has_deriv_at
(hl : has_fderiv_at l l' (f x)) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (l ∘ f) (l' (f')) x :=
begin
rw has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at,
convert has_fderiv_at.comp x hl hf,
ext,
simp
end
theorem has_fderiv_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at
(hl : has_fderiv_at l l' (f x)) (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (l ∘ f) (l' (f')) s x :=
begin
rw ← has_fderiv_within_at_univ at hl,
exact has_fderiv_within_at.comp_has_deriv_within_at x hl hf subset_preimage_univ
end
lemma fderiv_within.comp_deriv_within {t : set F}
(hl : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 l t (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (l ∘ f) s x = (fderiv_within 𝕜 l t (f x) : F → E) (deriv_within f s x) :=
begin
apply has_deriv_within_at.deriv_within _ hxs,
exact (hl.has_fderiv_within_at).comp_has_deriv_within_at x (hf.has_deriv_within_at) hs
end
lemma fderiv.comp_deriv
(hl : differentiable_at 𝕜 l (f x)) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (l ∘ f) x = (fderiv 𝕜 l (f x) : F → E) (deriv f x) :=
begin
apply has_deriv_at.deriv _,
exact (hl.has_fderiv_at).comp_has_deriv_at x (hf.has_deriv_at)
end
end composition_vector
section mul
/-! ### Derivative of the multiplication of two scalar functions -/
variables {c d : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' d' : 𝕜}
theorem has_deriv_within_at.mul
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (hd : has_deriv_within_at d d' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') s x :=
begin
convert hc.smul hd using 1,
rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, add_comm]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.mul (hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (hd : has_deriv_at d d' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.mul hd
end
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.mul
(hc : has_strict_deriv_at c c' x) (hd : has_strict_deriv_at d d' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') x :=
begin
convert hc.smul hd using 1,
rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, add_comm]
end
lemma deriv_within_mul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) :
deriv_within (λ y, c y * d y) s x = deriv_within c s x * d x + c x * deriv_within d s x :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.mul hd.has_deriv_within_at).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_mul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) :
deriv (λ y, c y * d y) x = deriv c x * d x + c x * deriv d x :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.mul hd.has_deriv_at).deriv
theorem has_deriv_within_at.mul_const (hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y * d) (c' * d) s x :=
begin
convert hc.mul (has_deriv_within_at_const x s d),
rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.mul_const (hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y * d) (c' * d) x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.mul_const d
end
lemma deriv_within_mul_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (d : 𝕜) :
deriv_within (λ y, c y * d) s x = deriv_within c s x * d :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.mul_const d).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_mul_const (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (d : 𝕜) :
deriv (λ y, c y * d) x = deriv c x * d :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.mul_const d).deriv
theorem has_deriv_within_at.const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hd : has_deriv_within_at d d' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c * d y) (c * d') s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_within_at_const x s c).mul hd,
rw [zero_mul, zero_add]
end
theorem has_deriv_at.const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hd : has_deriv_at d d' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c * d y) (c * d') x :=
begin
rw [← has_deriv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hd.const_mul c
end
lemma deriv_within_const_mul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(c : 𝕜) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) :
deriv_within (λ y, c * d y) s x = c * deriv_within d s x :=
(hd.has_deriv_within_at.const_mul c).deriv_within hxs
lemma deriv_const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) :
deriv (λ y, c * d y) x = c * deriv d x :=
(hd.has_deriv_at.const_mul c).deriv
end mul
section inverse
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ x⁻¹` -/
theorem has_strict_deriv_at_inv (hx : x ≠ 0) : has_strict_deriv_at has_inv.inv (-(x^2)⁻¹) x :=
begin
suffices : is_o (λ p : 𝕜 × 𝕜, (p.1 - p.2) * ((x * x)⁻¹ - (p.1 * p.2)⁻¹))
(λ (p : 𝕜 × 𝕜), (p.1 - p.2) * 1) (𝓝 (x, x)),
{ refine this.congr' _ (eventually_of_forall _ $ λ _, mul_one _),
refine eventually.mono (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_prod is_open_ne is_open_ne) ⟨hx, hx⟩) _,
rintro ⟨y, z⟩ ⟨hy, hz⟩,
simp only [mem_set_of_eq] at hy hz, -- hy : y ≠ 0, hz : z ≠ 0
field_simp [hx, hy, hz], ring, },
refine (is_O_refl (λ p : 𝕜 × 𝕜, p.1 - p.2) _).mul_is_o ((is_o_one_iff _).2 _),
rw [← sub_self (x * x)⁻¹],
exact tendsto_const_nhds.sub ((continuous_mul.tendsto (x, x)).inv' $ mul_ne_zero hx hx)
end
theorem has_deriv_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λy, y⁻¹) (-(x^2)⁻¹) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero).has_deriv_at
theorem has_deriv_within_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (s : set 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λx, x⁻¹) (-(x^2)⁻¹) s x :=
(has_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero).has_deriv_within_at
lemma differentiable_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, x⁻¹) x :=
(has_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, x⁻¹) s x :=
(differentiable_at_inv x_ne_zero).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_on_inv : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx:𝕜, x⁻¹) {x | x ≠ 0} :=
λx hx, differentiable_within_at_inv hx
lemma deriv_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, x⁻¹) x = -(x^2)⁻¹ :=
(has_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero).deriv
lemma deriv_within_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, x⁻¹) s x = -(x^2)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.deriv_within (differentiable_at_inv x_ne_zero) hxs,
exact deriv_inv x_ne_zero
end
lemma has_fderiv_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_at (λx, x⁻¹) (smul_right 1 (-(x^2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
has_deriv_at_inv x_ne_zero
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λx, x⁻¹) (smul_right 1 (-(x^2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) s x :=
(has_fderiv_at_inv x_ne_zero).has_fderiv_within_at
lemma fderiv_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λx, x⁻¹) x = smul_right 1 (-(x^2)⁻¹) :=
(has_fderiv_at_inv x_ne_zero).fderiv
lemma fderiv_within_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λx, x⁻¹) s x = smul_right 1 (-(x^2)⁻¹) :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within (differentiable_at_inv x_ne_zero) hxs,
exact fderiv_inv x_ne_zero
end
variables {c : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' : 𝕜}
lemma has_deriv_within_at.inv
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, (c y)⁻¹) (- c' / (c x)^2) s x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_inv hx).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hc,
field_simp
end
lemma has_deriv_at.inv (hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, (c y)⁻¹) (- c' / (c x)^2) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hc.inv hx
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.inv (hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, (c x)⁻¹) s x :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.inv hx).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.inv (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, (c x)⁻¹) x :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.inv hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.inv (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, (c x)⁻¹) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).inv (hx x h)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.inv (hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (hx : ∀ x, c x ≠ 0) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λx, (c x)⁻¹) :=
λx, (hc x).inv (hx x)
lemma deriv_within_inv' (hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hx : c x ≠ 0)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, (c x)⁻¹) s x = - (deriv_within c s x) / (c x)^2 :=
(hc.has_deriv_within_at.inv hx).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_inv' (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, (c x)⁻¹) x = - (deriv c x) / (c x)^2 :=
(hc.has_deriv_at.inv hx).deriv
end inverse
section division
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ c x / d x` -/
variables {c d : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' d' : 𝕜}
lemma has_deriv_within_at.div
(hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) (hd : has_deriv_within_at d d' s x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, c y / d y) ((c' * d x - c x * d') / (d x)^2) s x :=
begin
have A : (d x)⁻¹ * (d x)⁻¹ * (c' * d x) = (d x)⁻¹ * c',
by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hx, one_mul],
convert hc.mul ((has_deriv_at_inv hx).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hd),
simp [div_eq_inv_mul', pow_two, mul_inv', mul_add, A, sub_eq_add_neg],
ring
end
lemma has_deriv_at.div (hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) (hd : has_deriv_at d d' x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, c y / d y) ((c' * d x - c x * d') / (d x)^2) x :=
begin
rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *,
exact hc.div hd hx
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.div
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, c x / d x) s x :=
((hc.has_deriv_within_at).div (hd.has_deriv_within_at) hx).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.div
(hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, c x / d x) x :=
((hc.has_deriv_at).div (hd.has_deriv_at) hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.div
(hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (hd : differentiable_on 𝕜 d s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, d x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, c x / d x) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).div (hd x h) (hx x h)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.div
(hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (hd : differentiable 𝕜 d) (hx : ∀ x, d x ≠ 0) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λx, c x / d x) :=
λx, (hc x).div (hd x) (hx x)
lemma deriv_within_div
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) (hx : d x ≠ 0)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, c x / d x) s x
= ((deriv_within c s x) * d x - c x * (deriv_within d s x)) / (d x)^2 :=
((hc.has_deriv_within_at).div (hd.has_deriv_within_at) hx).deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_div
(hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) (hx : d x ≠ 0) :
deriv (λx, c x / d x) x = ((deriv c x) * d x - c x * (deriv d x)) / (d x)^2 :=
((hc.has_deriv_at).div (hd.has_deriv_at) hx).deriv
end division
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' x : 𝕜}
(hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) (hf' : f' ≠ 0) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f
(continuous_linear_equiv.units_equiv_aut 𝕜 (units.mk0 f' hf') : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
hf
theorem has_deriv_at.has_fderiv_at_equiv {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' x : 𝕜}
(hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hf' : f' ≠ 0) :
has_fderiv_at f
(continuous_linear_equiv.units_equiv_aut 𝕜 (units.mk0 f' hf') : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
hf
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in some neighborhood of `a`, `g` is continuous at `a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `g a` in the strict sense, then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`
in the strict sense.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have an
inverse function. -/
theorem has_strict_deriv_at.of_local_left_inverse {f g : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' a : 𝕜}
(hg : continuous_at g a) (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' (g a)) (hf' : f' ≠ 0)
(hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f (g y) = y) :
has_strict_deriv_at g f'⁻¹ a :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv hf').of_local_left_inverse hg hfg
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in some neighborhood of `a`, `g` is continuous at `a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `g a`, then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem has_deriv_at.of_local_left_inverse {f g : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' a : 𝕜}
(hg : continuous_at g a) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' (g a)) (hf' : f' ≠ 0)
(hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f (g y) = y) :
has_deriv_at g f'⁻¹ a :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at_equiv hf').of_local_left_inverse hg hfg
end
namespace polynomial
/-! ### Derivative of a polynomial -/
variables {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜}
variable (p : polynomial 𝕜)
/-- The derivative (in the analysis sense) of a polynomial `p` is given by `p.derivative`. -/
protected lemma has_strict_deriv_at (x : 𝕜) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λx, p.eval x) (p.derivative.eval x) x :=
begin
apply p.induction_on,
{ simp [has_strict_deriv_at_const] },
{ assume p q hp hq,
convert hp.add hq;
simp },
{ assume n a h,
convert h.mul (has_strict_deriv_at_id x),
{ ext y, simp [pow_add, mul_assoc] },
{ simp [pow_add], ring } }
end
/-- The derivative (in the analysis sense) of a polynomial `p` is given by `p.derivative`. -/
protected lemma has_deriv_at (x : 𝕜) : has_deriv_at (λx, p.eval x) (p.derivative.eval x) x :=
(p.has_strict_deriv_at x).has_deriv_at
protected theorem has_deriv_within_at (x : 𝕜) (s : set 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λx, p.eval x) (p.derivative.eval x) s x :=
(p.has_deriv_at x).has_deriv_within_at
protected lemma differentiable_at : differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) x :=
(p.has_deriv_at x).differentiable_at
protected lemma differentiable_within_at : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) s x :=
p.differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at
protected lemma differentiable : differentiable 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) :=
λx, p.differentiable_at
protected lemma differentiable_on : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) s :=
p.differentiable.differentiable_on
@[simp] protected lemma deriv : deriv (λx, p.eval x) x = p.derivative.eval x :=
(p.has_deriv_at x).deriv
protected lemma deriv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, p.eval x) s x = p.derivative.eval x :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.deriv_within p.differentiable_at hxs,
exact p.deriv
end
protected lemma continuous : continuous (λx, p.eval x) :=
p.differentiable.continuous
protected lemma continuous_on : continuous_on (λx, p.eval x) s :=
p.continuous.continuous_on
protected lemma continuous_at : continuous_at (λx, p.eval x) x :=
p.continuous.continuous_at
protected lemma continuous_within_at : continuous_within_at (λx, p.eval x) s x :=
p.continuous_at.continuous_within_at
protected lemma has_fderiv_at (x : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_at (λx, p.eval x) (smul_right 1 (p.derivative.eval x) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
by simpa [has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at] using p.has_deriv_at x
protected lemma has_fderiv_within_at (x : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λx, p.eval x) (smul_right 1 (p.derivative.eval x) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) s x :=
(p.has_fderiv_at x).has_fderiv_within_at
@[simp] protected lemma fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) x = smul_right 1 (p.derivative.eval x) :=
(p.has_fderiv_at x).fderiv
protected lemma fderiv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λx, p.eval x) s x = smul_right 1 (p.derivative.eval x) :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within p.differentiable_at hxs,
exact p.fderiv
end
end polynomial
section pow
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ x^n` for `n : ℕ` -/
variables {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜} {c : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' : 𝕜}
variable {n : ℕ }
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_pow (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕜) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λx, x^n) ((n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1)) x :=
begin
convert (polynomial.C 1 * (polynomial.X)^n).has_strict_deriv_at x,
{ simp },
{ rw [polynomial.derivative_monomial], simp }
end
lemma has_deriv_at_pow (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕜) : has_deriv_at (λx, x^n) ((n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1)) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_pow n x).has_deriv_at
theorem has_deriv_within_at_pow (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕜) (s : set 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λx, x^n) ((n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1)) s x :=
(has_deriv_at_pow n x).has_deriv_within_at
lemma differentiable_at_pow : differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, x^n) x :=
(has_deriv_at_pow n x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at_pow : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, x^n) s x :=
differentiable_at_pow.differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_pow : differentiable 𝕜 (λx:𝕜, x^n) :=
λx, differentiable_at_pow
lemma differentiable_on_pow : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, x^n) s :=
differentiable_pow.differentiable_on
lemma deriv_pow : deriv (λx, x^n) x = (n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1) :=
(has_deriv_at_pow n x).deriv
@[simp] lemma deriv_pow' : deriv (λx, x^n) = λ x, (n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1) :=
funext $ λ x, deriv_pow
lemma deriv_within_pow (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, x^n) s x = (n : 𝕜) * x^(n-1) :=
(has_deriv_within_at_pow n x s).deriv_within hxs
lemma iter_deriv_pow' {k : ℕ} :
deriv^[k] (λx:𝕜, x^n) = λ x, ((finset.range k).prod (λ i, n - i):ℕ) * x^(n-k) :=
begin
induction k with k ihk,
{ simp only [one_mul, finset.prod_range_zero, nat.iterate_zero, nat.sub_zero, nat.cast_one] },
{ simp only [nat.iterate_succ', ihk, finset.prod_range_succ],
ext x,
rw [((has_deriv_at_pow (n - k) x).const_mul _).deriv, nat.cast_mul, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc,
nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.sub_sub] }
end
lemma iter_deriv_pow {k : ℕ} :
deriv^[k] (λx:𝕜, x^n) x = ((finset.range k).prod (λ i, n - i):ℕ) * x^(n-k) :=
congr_fun iter_deriv_pow' x
lemma has_deriv_within_at.pow (hc : has_deriv_within_at c c' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ y, (c y)^n) ((n : 𝕜) * (c x)^(n-1) * c') s x :=
(has_deriv_at_pow n (c x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hc
lemma has_deriv_at.pow (hc : has_deriv_at c c' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ y, (c y)^n) ((n : 𝕜) * (c x)^(n-1) * c') x :=
by { rw ← has_deriv_within_at_univ at *, exact hc.pow }
lemma differentiable_within_at.pow (hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, (c x)^n) s x :=
hc.has_deriv_within_at.pow.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.pow (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, (c x)^n) x :=
hc.has_deriv_at.pow.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.pow (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, (c x)^n) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).pow
@[simp] lemma differentiable.pow (hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λx, (c x)^n) :=
λx, (hc x).pow
lemma deriv_within_pow' (hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
deriv_within (λx, (c x)^n) s x = (n : 𝕜) * (c x)^(n-1) * (deriv_within c s x) :=
hc.has_deriv_within_at.pow.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_pow'' (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) :
deriv (λx, (c x)^n) x = (n : 𝕜) * (c x)^(n-1) * (deriv c x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.pow.deriv
end pow
section fpow
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ x^m` for `m : ℤ` -/
variables {x : 𝕜} {s : set 𝕜}
variable {m : ℤ}
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_fpow (m : ℤ) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λx, x^m) ((m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1)) x :=
begin
have : ∀ m : ℤ, 0 < m → has_strict_deriv_at (λx, x^m) ((m:𝕜) * x^(m-1)) x,
{ assume m hm,
lift m to ℕ using (le_of_lt hm),
simp only [fpow_of_nat, int.cast_coe_nat],
convert has_strict_deriv_at_pow _ _ using 2,
rw [← int.coe_nat_one, ← int.coe_nat_sub, fpow_coe_nat],
norm_cast at hm,
exact nat.succ_le_of_lt hm },
rcases lt_trichotomy m 0 with hm|hm|hm,
{ have := (has_strict_deriv_at_inv _).scomp _ (this (-m) (neg_pos.2 hm));
[skip, exact fpow_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hx _],
simp only [(∘), fpow_neg, one_div_eq_inv, inv_inv', smul_eq_mul] at this,
convert this using 1,
rw [pow_two, mul_inv', inv_inv', int.cast_neg, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, neg_mul_neg,
← fpow_add hx, mul_assoc, ← fpow_add hx], congr, abel },
{ simp only [hm, fpow_zero, int.cast_zero, zero_mul, has_strict_deriv_at_const] },
{ exact this m hm }
end
lemma has_deriv_at_fpow (m : ℤ) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
has_deriv_at (λx, x^m) ((m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1)) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_fpow m hx).has_deriv_at
theorem has_deriv_within_at_fpow (m : ℤ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (s : set 𝕜) :
has_deriv_within_at (λx, x^m) ((m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1)) s x :=
(has_deriv_at_fpow m hx).has_deriv_within_at
lemma differentiable_at_fpow (hx : x ≠ 0) : differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, x^m) x :=
(has_deriv_at_fpow m hx).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at_fpow (hx : x ≠ 0) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, x^m) s x :=
(differentiable_at_fpow hx).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_on_fpow (hs : (0:𝕜) ∉ s) : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, x^m) s :=
λ x hxs, differentiable_within_at_fpow (λ hx, hs $ hx ▸ hxs)
-- TODO : this is true at `x=0` as well
lemma deriv_fpow (hx : x ≠ 0) : deriv (λx, x^m) x = (m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1) :=
(has_deriv_at_fpow m hx).deriv
lemma deriv_within_fpow (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
deriv_within (λx, x^m) s x = (m : 𝕜) * x^(m-1) :=
(has_deriv_within_at_fpow m hx s).deriv_within hxs
lemma iter_deriv_fpow {k : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
deriv^[k] (λx:𝕜, x^m) x = ((finset.range k).prod (λ i, m - i):ℤ) * x^(m-k) :=
begin
induction k with k ihk generalizing x hx,
{ simp only [one_mul, finset.prod_range_zero, nat.iterate_zero, int.coe_nat_zero, sub_zero,
int.cast_one] },
{ rw [nat.iterate_succ', finset.prod_range_succ, int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, int.coe_nat_succ,
← sub_sub, ← ((has_deriv_at_fpow _ hx).const_mul _).deriv],
apply deriv_congr_of_mem_nhds,
apply eventually.mono _ @ihk,
exact mem_nhds_sets is_open_ne hx }
end
end fpow
/-! ### Upper estimates on liminf and limsup -/
section real
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' : ℝ} {s : set ℝ} {x : ℝ} {r : ℝ}
lemma has_deriv_within_at.limsup_slope_le (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hr : f' < r) :
∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x (s \ {x}), (z - x)⁻¹ * (f z - f x) < r :=
has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope.1 hf (mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio hr)
lemma has_deriv_within_at.limsup_slope_le' (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x)
(hs : x ∉ s) (hr : f' < r) :
∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x s, (z - x)⁻¹ * (f z - f x) < r :=
(has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope' hs).1 hf (mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio hr)
lemma has_deriv_within_at.liminf_right_slope_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' (Ioi x) x) (hr : f' < r) :
∃ᶠ z in nhds_within x (Ioi x), (z - x)⁻¹ * (f z - f x) < r :=
(hf.limsup_slope_le' (lt_irrefl x) hr).frequently (nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot x)
end real
section real_space
open metric
variables {E : Type u} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] {f : ℝ → E} {f' : E} {s : set ℝ}
{x r : ℝ}
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `s` at `x`, then for any `r > ∥f'∥` the ratio
`∥f z - f x∥ / ∥z - x∥` is less than `r` in some neighborhood of `x` within `s`.
In other words, the limit superior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x` along `s`
is less than or equal to `∥f'∥`. -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.limsup_norm_slope_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hr : ∥f'∥ < r) :
∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x s, ∥z - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f z - f x∥ < r :=
begin
have hr₀ : 0 < r, from lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg f') hr,
have A : ∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x (s \ {x}), ∥(z - x)⁻¹ • (f z - f x)∥ ∈ Iio r,
from (has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope.1 hf).norm (mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio hr),
have B : ∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x {x}, ∥(z - x)⁻¹ • (f z - f x)∥ ∈ Iio r,
from mem_sets_of_superset self_mem_nhds_within
(singleton_subset_iff.2 $ by simp [hr₀]),
have C := mem_sup_sets.2 ⟨A, B⟩,
rw [← nhds_within_union, diff_union_self, nhds_within_union, mem_sup_sets] at C,
filter_upwards [C.1],
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, norm_smul, mem_Iio, normed_field.norm_inv],
exact λ _, id
end
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `s` at `x`, then for any `r > ∥f'∥` the ratio
`(∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥) / ∥z - x∥` is less than `r` in some neighborhood of `x` within `s`.
In other words, the limit superior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x` along `s`
is less than or equal to `∥f'∥`.
This lemma is a weaker version of `has_deriv_within_at.limsup_norm_slope_le`
where `∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥` is replaced by `∥f z - f x∥`. -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.limsup_slope_norm_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) (hr : ∥f'∥ < r) :
∀ᶠ z in nhds_within x s, ∥z - x∥⁻¹ * (∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥) < r :=
begin
apply (hf.limsup_norm_slope_le hr).mono,
assume z hz,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_sub_norm_le _ _) _) hz,
exact inv_nonneg.2 (norm_nonneg _)
end
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `(x, +∞)` at `x`, then for any `r > ∥f'∥` the ratio
`∥f z - f x∥ / ∥z - x∥` is frequently less than `r` as `z → x+0`.
In other words, the limit inferior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x+0`
is less than or equal to `∥f'∥`. See also `has_deriv_within_at.limsup_norm_slope_le`
for a stronger version using limit superior and any set `s`. -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.liminf_right_norm_slope_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' (Ioi x) x) (hr : ∥f'∥ < r) :
∃ᶠ z in nhds_within x (Ioi x), ∥z - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f z - f x∥ < r :=
(hf.limsup_norm_slope_le hr).frequently (nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot x)
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` within `(x, +∞)` at `x`, then for any `r > ∥f'∥` the ratio
`(∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥) / (z - x)` is frequently less than `r` as `z → x+0`.
In other words, the limit inferior of this ratio as `z` tends to `x+0`
is less than or equal to `∥f'∥`.
See also
* `has_deriv_within_at.limsup_norm_slope_le` for a stronger version using
limit superior and any set `s`;
* `has_deriv_within_at.liminf_right_norm_slope_le` for a stronger version using
`∥f z - f x∥` instead of `∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥`. -/
lemma has_deriv_within_at.liminf_right_slope_norm_le
(hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' (Ioi x) x) (hr : ∥f'∥ < r) :
∃ᶠ z in nhds_within x (Ioi x), (z - x)⁻¹ * (∥f z∥ - ∥f x∥) < r :=
begin
have := (hf.limsup_slope_norm_le hr).frequently (nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot x),
refine this.mp (eventually.mono self_mem_nhds_within _),
assume z hxz hz,
rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos (sub_pos_of_lt hxz)] at hz
end
end real_space
|
7c11e1ec04c41199cd4d9abed126813a18fe9331 | 853df553b1d6ca524e3f0a79aedd32dde5d27ec3 | /src/topology/algebra/uniform_ring.lean | c8d4ef67823bda3279487cbd30cdf4187ef97162 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | DanielFabian/mathlib | efc3a50b5dde303c59eeb6353ef4c35a345d7112 | f520d07eba0c852e96fe26da71d85bf6d40fcc2a | refs/heads/master | 1,668,739,922,971 | 1,595,201,756,000 | 1,595,201,756,000 | 279,469,476 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,594,696,604,000 | 1,594,696,604,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,430 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
Theory of topological rings with uniform structure.
-/
import topology.algebra.group_completion
import topology.algebra.ring
open classical set filter topological_space add_comm_group
open_locale classical
noncomputable theory
namespace uniform_space.completion
open dense_inducing uniform_space function
variables (α : Type*) [ring α] [uniform_space α]
instance : has_one (completion α) := ⟨(1:α)⟩
instance : has_mul (completion α) :=
⟨curry $ (dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend (coe ∘ uncurry (*))⟩
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : α) : completion α) = 1 := rfl
variables {α} [topological_ring α]
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_mul (a b : α) : ((a * b : α) : completion α) = a * b :=
((dense_inducing_coe.prod dense_inducing_coe).extend_eq_of_cont
((continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul) (a, b)).symm
variables [uniform_add_group α]
lemma continuous_mul : continuous (λ p : completion α × completion α, p.1 * p.2) :=
begin
haveI : is_Z_bilin ((coe ∘ uncurry (*)) : α × α → completion α) :=
{ add_left := begin
introv,
change coe ((a + a')*b) = coe (a*b) + coe (a'*b),
rw_mod_cast add_mul
end,
add_right := begin
introv,
change coe (a*(b + b')) = coe (a*b) + coe (a*b'),
rw_mod_cast mul_add
end },
have : continuous ((coe ∘ uncurry (*)) : α × α → completion α),
from (continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul,
convert dense_inducing_coe.extend_Z_bilin dense_inducing_coe this,
simp only [(*), curry, prod.mk.eta]
end
lemma continuous.mul {β : Type*} [topological_space β] {f g : β → completion α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, f b * g b) :=
continuous_mul.comp (continuous.prod_mk hf hg)
instance : ring (completion α) :=
{ one_mul := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous.mul continuous_const continuous_id) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, one_mul]),
mul_one := assume a, completion.induction_on a
(is_closed_eq (continuous.mul continuous_id continuous_const) continuous_id)
(assume a, by rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, mul_one]),
mul_assoc := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul (continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul continuous_fst
(continuous.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_assoc]),
left_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous.add
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)))
(continuous.add
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, mul_add]),
right_distrib := assume a b c, completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(is_closed_eq
(continuous.mul (continuous.add continuous_fst
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.add
(continuous.mul continuous_fst (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
(assume a b c, by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ←coe_add, add_mul]),
..completion.add_comm_group, ..completion.has_mul α, ..completion.has_one α }
/-- The map from a uniform ring to its completion, as a ring homomorphism. -/
def coe_ring_hom : α →+* completion α :=
⟨coe, coe_one α, assume a b, coe_mul a b, coe_zero, assume a b, coe_add a b⟩
universes u
variables {β : Type u} [uniform_space β] [ring β] [uniform_add_group β] [topological_ring β]
(f : α →+* β) (hf : continuous f)
/-- The completion extension as a ring morphism. -/
def extension_hom [complete_space β] [separated_space β] :
completion α →+* β :=
have hf : uniform_continuous f, from uniform_continuous_of_continuous hf,
{ to_fun := completion.extension f,
map_zero' := by rw [← coe_zero, extension_coe hf, f.map_zero],
map_add' := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_add)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).add
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_add, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf,
f.map_add]),
map_one' := by rw [← coe_one, extension_coe hf, f.map_one],
map_mul' := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_mul)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).mul (continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
(assume a b,
by rw [← coe_mul, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, extension_coe hf, f.map_mul]) }
instance top_ring_compl : topological_ring (completion α) :=
{ continuous_add := continuous_add,
continuous_mul := continuous_mul,
continuous_neg := continuous_neg }
/-- The completion map as a ring morphism. -/
def map_ring_hom : completion α →+* completion β :=
extension_hom (coe_ring_hom.comp f) ((continuous_coe β).comp hf)
variables (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] [uniform_space R] [uniform_add_group R] [topological_ring R]
instance : comm_ring (completion R) :=
{ mul_comm := assume a b, completion.induction_on₂ a b
(is_closed_eq (continuous_fst.mul continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.mul continuous_fst))
(assume a b, by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_comm]),
..completion.ring }
end uniform_space.completion
namespace uniform_space
variables {α : Type*}
lemma ring_sep_rel (α) [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
separation_setoid α = submodule.quotient_rel (ideal.closure ⊥) :=
setoid.ext $ assume x y, group_separation_rel x y
lemma ring_sep_quot (α) [r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) = (⊥ : ideal α).closure.quotient :=
by rw [@ring_sep_rel α r]; refl
def sep_quot_equiv_ring_quot (α)
[r : comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
quotient (separation_setoid α) ≃ (⊥ : ideal α).closure.quotient :=
quotient.congr_right $ assume x y, group_separation_rel x y
/- TODO: use a form of transport a.k.a. lift definition a.k.a. transfer -/
instance [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
comm_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
by rw ring_sep_quot α; apply_instance
instance [comm_ring α] [uniform_space α] [uniform_add_group α] [topological_ring α] :
topological_ring (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
begin
convert topological_ring_quotient (⊥ : ideal α).closure; try {apply ring_sep_rel},
simp [uniform_space.comm_ring]
end
end uniform_space
|
289a5327d2eef988747594b25c032bfd8987880a | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /tests/lean/run/simp4.lean | 9046587cbe0a6ee5deb0d82847ff7644e36f244b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,512 | lean | constant f : Nat → Nat
constant q : Nat → Prop
constant r : Nat → Prop
@[simp] axiom ax1 (p : Prop) : (p ∧ True) ↔ p
@[simp] axiom ax2 (x : Nat) : q (f x)
@[simp] axiom ax3 (x : Nat) : ¬ r (f x)
@[simp] axiom ax4 (p : Prop) : (p ∨ False) ↔ p
theorem ex1 (x : Nat) (h : q x) : q x ∧ q (f x) := by
simp [h]
theorem ex2 (x : Nat) : q (f x) ∨ r (f x) := by
simp
@[simp] axiom ax5 (x : Nat) : 0 + x = x
theorem ex3 (h : 0 + x = y) : f x = f y := by
simp at h
simp [h]
theorem ex4 (x y z : Nat) (h : (x, z).1 = y) : f x = f y := by
simp at h
simp [h]
theorem ex5
(f : Nat → Nat → Nat)
(g : Nat → Nat)
(h₁ : ∀ x, f x x = x)
(h₂ : ∀ x, g (g x) = x)
: f (g (g x)) (f x x) = x :=
by simp [h₁, h₂]
@[simp] axiom ax6 (x : Nat) : x + 0 = x
theorem ex6
(f : Nat → Nat)
(x y : Nat)
: (fun (h : y = 0) => y + x) = (fun _ => x + 0) := by
simp { contextual := true }
theorem ex7 (x : Nat) : (let y := x + 0; y + y) = x + x := by
simp
@[simp] theorem impTrue (p : Sort u) : (p → True) = True :=
propext <| Iff.intro (fun _ => trivial) (fun _ _ => trivial)
theorem ex8 (y x : Nat) : y = 0 → x + y = 0 → x = 0 := by
simp { contextual := true }
theorem ex9 (y x : Nat) : y = 0 → x + y = 0 → x = 0 := by
simp
intro h₁ h₂
simp [h₁] at h₂
simp [h₂]
theorem ex10 (y x : Nat) : y = 0 → x + 0 = 0 → x = 0 := by
simp
intro h₁ h₂
simp [h₂]
theorem ex11 : ∀ x : Nat, 0 + x + 0 = x := by
simp
|
f02ae9339fc87468e0075fcab869476e585ab6ff | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/data/mllist.lean | e760e35196d15f67b05737fb579de363ad484f17 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,646 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Keeley Hoek, Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison
Monadic lazy lists.
The inductive construction is not allowed outside of meta (indeed, we can build infinite objects).
This isn't so bad, as the typical use is with the tactic monad, in any case.
As we're in meta anyway, we don't bother with proofs about these constructions.
-/
import data.option.defs
universes u v
namespace tactic -- We hide this away in the tactic namespace, just because it's all meta.
meta inductive mllist (m : Type u → Type u) (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : mllist
| cons : m (option α × mllist) → mllist
namespace mllist
variables {α β : Type u} {m : Type u → Type u} [alternative m]
meta def fix (f : α → m α) : α → mllist m α
| x := cons $ (λ a, (some x, fix a)) <$> f x <|> pure (some x, nil)
variables [monad m]
meta def fixl_with (f : α → m (α × list β)) : α → list β → mllist m β
| s (b :: rest) := cons $ pure (some b, fixl_with s rest)
| s [] := cons $ do {
(s', l) ← f s,
match l with
| (b :: rest) := pure (some b, fixl_with s' rest)
| [] := pure (none, fixl_with s' [])
end
} <|> pure (none, nil)
meta def fixl (f : α → m (α × list β)) (s : α) : mllist m β := fixl_with f s []
meta def uncons {α : Type u} : mllist m α → m (option (α × mllist m α))
| nil := pure none
| (cons l) := do (x, xs) ← l,
some x ← return x | uncons xs,
return (x, xs)
meta def empty {α : Type u} (xs : mllist m α) : m (ulift bool) :=
(ulift.up ∘ option.is_some) <$> uncons xs
meta def of_list {α : Type u} : list α → mllist m α
| [] := nil
| (h :: t) := cons (pure (h, of_list t))
meta def m_of_list {α : Type u} : list (m α) → mllist m α
| [] := nil
| (h :: t) := cons ((λ x, (x, m_of_list t)) <$> some <$> h)
meta def force {α} : mllist m α → m (list α)
| nil := pure []
| (cons l) :=
do (x, xs) ← l,
some x ← pure x | force xs,
(::) x <$> (force xs)
meta def take {α} : mllist m α → ℕ → m (list α)
| nil _ := pure []
| _ 0 := pure []
| (cons l) (n+1) :=
do (x, xs) ← l,
some x ← pure x | take xs (n+1),
(::) x <$> (take xs n)
meta def map {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) : mllist m α → mllist m β
| nil := nil
| (cons l) := cons $ do (x, xs) ← l, pure (f <$> x, map xs)
meta def mmap {α β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : mllist m α → mllist m β
| nil := nil
| (cons l) :=
cons $ do (x, xs) ← l,
b ← x.traverse f,
return (b, mmap xs)
meta def filter {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : mllist m α → mllist m α
| nil := nil
| (cons l) :=
cons $ do (a, r) ← l,
some a ← return a | return (none, filter r),
return (if p a then some a else none, filter r)
meta def mfilter [alternative m] {α β : Type u} (p : α → m β) : mllist m α → mllist m α
| nil := nil
| (cons l) :=
cons $ do (a, r) ← l,
some a ← return a | return (none, mfilter r),
(p a >> return (a, mfilter r)) <|> return (none , mfilter r)
meta def filter_map {α β : Type u} (f : α → option β) : mllist m α → mllist m β
| nil := nil
| (cons l) :=
cons $ do (a, r) ← l,
some a ← return a | return (none, filter_map r),
match f a with
| (some b) := return (some b, filter_map r)
| none := return (none, filter_map r)
end
meta def mfilter_map [alternative m] {α β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : mllist m α → mllist m β
| nil := nil
| (cons l) :=
cons $ do (a, r) ← l,
some a ← return a | return (none, mfilter_map r),
(f a >>= (λ b, return (some b, mfilter_map r))) <|> return (none, mfilter_map r)
meta def append {α : Type u} : mllist m α → mllist m α → mllist m α
| nil ys := ys
| (cons xs) ys :=
cons $ do (x, xs) ← xs,
return (x, append xs ys)
meta def join {α : Type u} : mllist m (mllist m α) → mllist m α
| nil := nil
| (cons l) :=
cons $ do (xs,r) ← l,
some xs ← return xs | return (none, join r),
match xs with
| nil := return (none, join r)
| cons m := do (a,n) ← m, return (a, join (cons $ return (n, r)))
end
meta def squash {α} (t : m (mllist m α)) : mllist m α :=
(mllist.m_of_list [t]).join
meta def enum_from {α : Type u} : ℕ → mllist m α → mllist m (ℕ × α)
| _ nil := nil
| n (cons l) :=
cons $ do (a, r) ← l,
some a ← return a | return (none, enum_from n r),
return ((n, a), (enum_from (n + 1) r))
meta def enum {α : Type u} : mllist m α → mllist m (ℕ × α) := enum_from 0
meta def range {m : Type → Type} [alternative m] : mllist m ℕ := mllist.fix (λ n, pure (n + 1)) 0
meta def concat {α : Type u} : mllist m α → α → mllist m α
| L a := (mllist.of_list [L, mllist.of_list [a]]).join
meta def bind_ {α β : Type u} : mllist m α → (α → mllist m β) → mllist m β
| nil f := nil
| (cons ll) f :=
cons $ do (x, xs) ← ll,
some x ← return x | return (none, bind_ xs f),
return (none, append (f x) (bind_ xs f))
meta def monad_lift {α} (x : m α) : mllist m α := cons $ (flip prod.mk nil ∘ some) <$> x
meta def head [alternative m] {α} (L : mllist m α) : m α :=
do some (r, _) ← L.uncons | failure,
return r
meta def mfirst [alternative m] {α β} (L : mllist m α) (f : α → m β) : m β :=
(L.mfilter_map f).head
end mllist
end tactic
|
50539cc30372d02eb53f85cc855c78859985bc77 | 329788bf44a766cbceec47f6d3a91aeee20146cf | /src/example.lean | 9b3e459e0c9fde1ff83ea1aae6e1e362e2d6e29f | [] | no_license | jamiebell2805/BSD-conjecture | ca69613bb4b0d7051575ff6a7528ccace1bf9c6b | 74aa51f13750868b7011e397576d6f8035d69360 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,937,124,285 | 1,624,744,421,000 | 1,624,744,421,000 | 364,047,425 | 7 | 0 | null | 1,624,482,924,000 | 1,620,072,330,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,111 | lean | -- example of an elliptic curve
import elliptic_curve_rationals -- <-- has a dodgy sorry I think
namespace elliptic_curve
/-- `E` is the elliptic curve $y^2=x^3-x$ over the integers.
## Notes
Cremona and Stein call this curve 32A2. Note in particular that it is a
global minimal model. The curve, and our model, have bad reduction
only at the prime 2. -/
def E : elliptic_curve := ⟨-1,0,by unfold disc; norm_num⟩
/-
## The `E` namespace
This is like saying: Let $E$ be the elliptic curve $y^2=x^3-x$ over the
rationals. We now develop some theory which is specific to this curve $E$,
for example a computation of its rank (note: this is not yet done).
-/
namespace E -- our example of an elliptic curve.
/-- In standard Lean notation $y^2=x^3+ax+b$, $a=-1$.
This is an implementation issue, so we teach it to the simplifier. -/
@[simp] lemma a : E.a = -1 := rfl
/-- In standard Lean notation $y^2=x^3+ax+b$, $b=0$.
This is an implementation issue, so we teach it to the simplifier. -/
@[simp] lemma b : E.b = 0 := rfl
theorem five_is_good : 5 ∈ E.good_primes :=
begin
-- delta E,
split,
{ norm_num },
{ simp [disc],
norm_num },
end
/-- `good_five` is the prime 5 in the type of good primes for the integral model of E. -/
def good_five : ↥(E.good_primes) := ⟨5, five_is_good⟩
-- API for this definition, teach it to simplifier and then forget it
@[simp] lemma good_five_coe : (good_five : ℤ) = 5 := rfl
/-
The affine curve $y^2=x^3-x$ mod 5 has solutions
$(0,0),(\pm1,0),(2,\pm1),(3,\pm1)$,
so seven solutions.
-/
theorem five_points : E.p_points good_five = {(0,0),(1,0),(-1,0),(2,1),(2,-1),(3,1),(3,-1)} :=
begin
delta p_points,
simp,
-- urk. Need tactical assistance
sorry
end
theorem a_five : a_p E good_five = -2 :=
begin
delta a_p,
simp,
let card_five_points := ↑(fintype.card (fintype ↥(E.p_points good_five))),
-- conv begin to_lhs, congr, skip, congr, end,
change (5 : ℤ) - card_five_points = -2,
suffices : card_five_points = 7,
rw this, norm_num,
have h := five_points,
-- no idea
sorry,
end
end E
end elliptic_curve |
c826bc2543cf0ab72ec2b465301006154041eb1a | 193da933cf42f2f9188bb47e3c973205bc2abc5c | /13.Inductive_Definitions/Data_Types/dm_sum.lean | c4ae7fd4a50ba498047f6339e2571b0b11f65ced | [] | no_license | pandaman64/cs-dm | aa4e2621c7a19e2dae911bc237c33e02fcb0c7a3 | bfd2f5fd2612472e15bd970c7870b5d0dd73bd1c | refs/heads/master | 1,647,620,340,607 | 1,570,055,187,000 | 1,570,055,187,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 439 | lean | /- *** Introduction *** -/
inductive dm_sum (α : Type) (β : Type)
| inl {} : α → dm_sum
| inr {} : β → dm_sum
/- Examples -/
def s1 : dm_sum nat bool := dm_sum.inl 1
def s2 : dm_sum nat bool := dm_sum.inr tt
/- *** Elimination *** -/
/- Example -/
def fixs: dm_sum nat bool → dm_sum nat bool
| (dm_sum.inl n) := dm_sum.inl (n - 1)
| (dm_sum.inr b) := dm_sum.inr ¬ b
#reduce s1
#reduce fixs s1
#reduce s2
#reduce fixs s2
|
984f1032f3e6821281ed8cda85efcfa874d9cb91 | d9d511f37a523cd7659d6f573f990e2a0af93c6f | /src/number_theory/bernoulli_polynomials.lean | e2c40d4afc2d05ac2e5453b922169bd5c1e443ce | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hikari0108/mathlib | b7ea2b7350497ab1a0b87a09d093ecc025a50dfa | a9e7d333b0cfd45f13a20f7b96b7d52e19fa2901 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,483,608,260 | 1,631,541,580,000 | 1,631,541,580,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,089 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Ashvni Narayanan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ashvni Narayanan
-/
import number_theory.bernoulli
/-!
# Bernoulli polynomials
The Bernoulli polynomials (defined here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_polynomials)
are an important tool obtained from Bernoulli numbers.
## Mathematical overview
The $n$-th Bernoulli polynomial is defined as
$$ B_n(X) = ∑_{k = 0}^n {n \choose k} (-1)^k * B_k * X^{n - k} $$
where $B_k$ is the $k$-th Bernoulli number. The Bernoulli polynomials are generating functions,
$$ t * e^{tX} / (e^t - 1) = ∑_{n = 0}^{\infty} B_n(X) * \frac{t^n}{n!} $$
## Implementation detail
Bernoulli polynomials are defined using `bernoulli`, the Bernoulli numbers.
## Main theorems
- `sum_bernoulli_poly`: The sum of the $k^\mathrm{th}$ Bernoulli polynomial with binomial
coefficients up to n is `(n + 1) * X^n`.
- `exp_bernoulli_poly`: The Bernoulli polynomials act as generating functions for the exponential.
## TODO
- `bernoulli_poly_eval_one_neg` : $$ B_n(1 - x) = (-1)^n*B_n(x) $$
- ``bernoulli_poly_eval_one` : Follows as a consequence of `bernoulli_poly_eval_one_neg`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators
open_locale nat
open nat finset
/-- The Bernoulli polynomials are defined in terms of the negative Bernoulli numbers. -/
def bernoulli_poly (n : ℕ) : polynomial ℚ :=
∑ i in range (n + 1), polynomial.monomial (n - i) ((bernoulli i) * (choose n i))
lemma bernoulli_poly_def (n : ℕ) : bernoulli_poly n =
∑ i in range (n + 1), polynomial.monomial i ((bernoulli (n - i)) * (choose n i)) :=
begin
rw [←sum_range_reflect, add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, bernoulli_poly],
apply sum_congr rfl,
rintros x hx,
rw mem_range_succ_iff at hx, rw [choose_symm hx, nat.sub_sub_self hx],
end
namespace bernoulli_poly
/-
### examples
-/
section examples
@[simp] lemma bernoulli_poly_zero : bernoulli_poly 0 = 1 :=
by simp [bernoulli_poly]
@[simp] lemma bernoulli_poly_eval_zero (n : ℕ) : (bernoulli_poly n).eval 0 = bernoulli n :=
begin
rw [bernoulli_poly, polynomial.eval_finset_sum, sum_range_succ],
have : ∑ (x : ℕ) in range n, bernoulli x * (n.choose x) * 0 ^ (n - x) = 0,
{ apply sum_eq_zero (λ x hx, _),
have h : 0 < n - x := nat.sub_pos_of_lt (mem_range.1 hx),
simp [h] },
simp [this],
end
@[simp] lemma bernoulli_poly_eval_one (n : ℕ) : (bernoulli_poly n).eval 1 = bernoulli' n :=
begin
simp only [bernoulli_poly, polynomial.eval_finset_sum],
simp only [←succ_eq_add_one, sum_range_succ, mul_one, cast_one, choose_self,
(bernoulli _).mul_comm, sum_bernoulli, one_pow, mul_one, polynomial.eval_C,
polynomial.eval_monomial],
by_cases h : n = 1,
{ norm_num [h], },
{ simp [h],
exact bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one h, }
end
end examples
@[simp] theorem sum_bernoulli_poly (n : ℕ) :
∑ k in range (n + 1), ((n + 1).choose k : ℚ) • bernoulli_poly k =
polynomial.monomial n (n + 1 : ℚ) :=
begin
simp_rw [bernoulli_poly_def, finset.smul_sum, finset.range_eq_Ico, ←finset.sum_Ico_Ico_comm,
finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range],
simp only [cast_succ, nat.add_sub_cancel_left, nat.sub_zero, zero_add, linear_map.map_add],
simp_rw [polynomial.smul_monomial, mul_comm (bernoulli _) _, smul_eq_mul, ←mul_assoc],
conv_lhs { apply_congr, skip, conv
{ apply_congr, skip,
rw [← nat.cast_mul, choose_mul ((nat.le_sub_left_iff_add_le $ mem_range_le H).1
$ mem_range_le H_1) (le.intro rfl), nat.cast_mul, add_comm x x_1, nat.add_sub_cancel,
mul_assoc, mul_comm, ←smul_eq_mul, ←polynomial.smul_monomial] },
rw [←sum_smul], },
rw [sum_range_succ_comm],
simp only [add_right_eq_self, cast_succ, mul_one, cast_one, cast_add, nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
choose_succ_self_right, one_smul, bernoulli_zero, sum_singleton, zero_add,
linear_map.map_add, range_one],
apply sum_eq_zero (λ x hx, _),
have f : ∀ x ∈ range n, ¬ n + 1 - x = 1,
{ rintros x H, rw [mem_range] at H,
rw [eq_comm],
exact ne_of_lt (nat.lt_of_lt_of_le one_lt_two (nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le (succ_le_succ H))) },
rw [sum_bernoulli],
have g : (ite (n + 1 - x = 1) (1 : ℚ) 0) = 0,
{ simp only [ite_eq_right_iff, one_ne_zero],
intro h₁,
exact (f x hx) h₁, },
rw [g, zero_smul],
end
open power_series
open polynomial (aeval)
variables {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [algebra ℚ A]
-- TODO: define exponential generating functions, and use them here
-- This name should probably be updated afterwards
/-- The theorem that `∑ Bₙ(t)X^n/n!)(e^X-1)=Xe^{tX}` -/
theorem exp_bernoulli_poly' (t : A) :
mk (λ n, aeval t ((1 / n! : ℚ) • bernoulli_poly n)) * (exp A - 1) = X * rescale t (exp A) :=
begin
-- check equality of power series by checking coefficients of X^n
ext n,
-- n = 0 case solved by `simp`
cases n, { simp },
-- n ≥ 1, the coefficients is a sum to n+2, so use `sum_range_succ` to write as
-- last term plus sum to n+1
rw [coeff_succ_X_mul, coeff_rescale, coeff_exp, coeff_mul,
nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk, sum_range_succ],
-- last term is zero so kill with `add_zero`
simp only [ring_hom.map_sub, nat.sub_self, constant_coeff_one, constant_coeff_exp,
coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff, mul_zero, sub_self, add_zero],
-- Let's multiply both sides by (n+1)! (OK because it's a unit)
set u : units ℚ := ⟨(n+1)!, (n+1)!⁻¹,
mul_inv_cancel (by exact_mod_cast factorial_ne_zero (n+1)),
inv_mul_cancel (by exact_mod_cast factorial_ne_zero (n+1))⟩ with hu,
rw ←units.mul_right_inj (units.map (algebra_map ℚ A).to_monoid_hom u),
-- now tidy up unit mess and generally do trivial rearrangements
-- to make RHS (n+1)*t^n
rw [units.coe_map, mul_left_comm, ring_hom.to_monoid_hom_eq_coe,
ring_hom.coe_monoid_hom, ←ring_hom.map_mul, hu, units.coe_mk],
change _ = t^n * algebra_map ℚ A (((n+1)*n! : ℕ)*(1/n!)),
rw [cast_mul, mul_assoc, mul_one_div_cancel
(show (n! : ℚ) ≠ 0, from cast_ne_zero.2 (factorial_ne_zero n)), mul_one, mul_comm (t^n),
← polynomial.aeval_monomial, cast_add, cast_one],
-- But this is the RHS of `sum_bernoulli_poly`
rw [← sum_bernoulli_poly, finset.mul_sum, alg_hom.map_sum],
-- and now we have to prove a sum is a sum, but all the terms are equal.
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
-- The rest is just trivialities, hampered by the fact that we're coercing
-- factorials and binomial coefficients between ℕ and ℚ and A.
intros i hi,
-- deal with coefficients of e^X-1
simp only [nat.cast_choose ℚ (mem_range_le hi), coeff_mk,
if_neg (mem_range_sub_ne_zero hi), one_div, alg_hom.map_smul, coeff_one, units.coe_mk,
coeff_exp, sub_zero, linear_map.map_sub, algebra.smul_mul_assoc, algebra.smul_def,
mul_right_comm _ ((aeval t) _), ←mul_assoc, ← ring_hom.map_mul, succ_eq_add_one],
-- finally cancel the Bernoulli polynomial and the algebra_map
congr',
apply congr_arg,
rw [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv'],
end
end bernoulli_poly
|
8bc50ca153f88865481cc8f6ce74039029f03976 | 30b012bb72d640ec30c8fdd4c45fdfa67beb012c | /linear_algebra/direct_sum_module.lean | 717743cb5433d632e5bc25696eba15cece5e0c92 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kckennylau/mathlib | 21fb810b701b10d6606d9002a4004f7672262e83 | 47b3477e20ffb5a06588dd3abb01fe0fe3205646 | refs/heads/master | 1,634,976,409,281 | 1,542,042,832,000 | 1,542,319,733,000 | 109,560,458 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,542,369,208,000 | 1,509,867,494,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,740 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
Direct sum of modules over commutative rings, indexed by a discrete type.
-/
import linear_algebra.basic
import algebra.pi_instances
import data.dfinsupp
universes u v w u₁
variables (R : Type u) [comm_ring R]
variables (ι : Type v) [decidable_eq ι] (β : ι → Type w)
variables [Π i, add_comm_group (β i)] [Π i, module R (β i)]
include R
def direct_sum : Type* := Π₀ i, β i
namespace direct_sum
variables {R ι β}
--local attribute [instance] dfinsupp.to_has_scalar'
instance direct_sum.add_comm_group : add_comm_group (direct_sum R ι β) :=
dfinsupp.add_comm_group
instance direct_sum.module : module R (direct_sum R ι β) :=
dfinsupp.to_module
variable β
def mk (s : finset ι) : (Π i : (↑s : set ι), β i.1) →ₗ direct_sum R ι β :=
dfinsupp.lmk β s
def of (i : ι) : β i →ₗ direct_sum R ι β :=
dfinsupp.lsingle β i
variable {β}
theorem mk_inj (s : finset ι) : function.injective ⇑(mk β s) :=
dfinsupp.mk_inj s
theorem of_inj (i : ι) : function.injective ⇑(of β i) :=
λ x y H, congr_fun (mk_inj _ H) ⟨i, by simp [finset.to_set]⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on {C : direct_sum R ι β → Prop}
(x : direct_sum R ι β) (H_zero : C 0)
(H_basic : ∀ (i : ι) (x : β i), C ((of β i : β i →ₗ direct_sum R ι β) x))
(H_plus : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C x :=
begin
apply dfinsupp.induction x H_zero,
intros i b f h1 h2 ih,
solve_by_elim
end
variables {γ : Type u₁} [add_comm_group γ] [module R γ]
variables (φ : Π i, β i →ₗ γ)
def to_module_aux (f : direct_sum R ι β) : γ :=
quotient.lift_on f (λ x, x.2.to_finset.sum $ λ i, φ i (x.1 i)) $ λ x y H,
begin
have H1 : x.2.to_finset ∩ y.2.to_finset ⊆ x.2.to_finset, from finset.inter_subset_left _ _,
have H2 : x.2.to_finset ∩ y.2.to_finset ⊆ y.2.to_finset, from finset.inter_subset_right _ _,
refine (finset.sum_subset H1 _).symm.trans ((finset.sum_congr rfl _).trans (finset.sum_subset H2 _)),
{ intros i H1 H2, rw finset.mem_inter at H2, rw H i,
simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset] at H1 H2,
rw [(y.3 i).resolve_left (mt (and.intro H1) H2), (φ i).map_zero] },
{ intros i H1, rw H i },
{ intros i H1 H2, rw finset.mem_inter at H2, rw ← H i,
simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset] at H1 H2,
rw [(x.3 i).resolve_left (mt (λ H3, and.intro H3 H1) H2), (φ i).map_zero] }
end
variables {φ}
theorem to_module_aux.add (f g) :
to_module_aux φ (f + g) = to_module_aux φ f + to_module_aux φ g :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on f (λ x, _),
refine quotient.induction_on g (λ y, _),
change finset.sum _ _ = finset.sum _ _ + finset.sum _ _,
simp only [(φ _).map_add, finset.sum_add_distrib],
congr' 1,
{ refine (finset.sum_subset _ _).symm,
{ intro i, simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.mem_add], exact or.inl },
{ intros i H1 H2, simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.mem_add] at H2,
rw [(x.3 i).resolve_left H2, (φ i).map_zero] } },
{ refine (finset.sum_subset _ _).symm,
{ intro i, simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.mem_add], exact or.inr },
{ intros i H1 H2, simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.mem_add] at H2,
rw [(y.3 i).resolve_left H2, (φ i).map_zero] } }
end
theorem to_module_aux.smul (c f) :
to_module_aux φ (c • f) = c • to_module_aux φ f :=
begin
refine quotient.induction_on f (λ x, _),
refine eq.trans (finset.sum_congr rfl _) (finset.sum_hom _ _ _),
{ intros i h1, dsimp at *, simp [h1, (φ i).map_smul] },
all_goals { simp [smul_add] }
end
variable (φ)
def to_module : direct_sum R ι β →ₗ γ :=
⟨to_module_aux φ, to_module_aux.add, to_module_aux.smul⟩
variable {φ}
lemma to_module_apply (x) :
(to_module φ : direct_sum R ι (λ (i : ι), β i) →ₗ γ) x = to_module_aux φ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_module.of (i) (x : β i) :
(to_module φ : direct_sum R ι (λ (i : ι), β i) →ₗ γ) ((of β i : β i →ₗ direct_sum R ι β) x) = φ i x :=
by dsimp [to_module_apply, to_module_aux, of, dfinsupp.single, dfinsupp.mk, to_module_aux]; simp
variables {ψ : direct_sum R ι β →ₗ γ}
variables (H1 : ∀ (i : ι) (x : β i),
ψ ((of β i : β i →ₗ direct_sum R ι β) x)
= (to_module φ : direct_sum R ι (λ (i : ι), β i) →ₗ γ) ((of β i : β i →ₗ direct_sum R ι β) x))
theorem to_module.unique (f : direct_sum R ι β) :
ψ f = (to_module φ : direct_sum R ι (λ (i : ι), β i) →ₗ γ) f :=
direct_sum.induction_on f
(ψ.map_zero.trans (to_module _).map_zero.symm) H1 $ λ f g ihf ihg,
by rw [ψ.map_add, (to_module _).map_add, ihf, ihg]
variables {ψ' : direct_sum R ι β →ₗ γ}
variables (H2 : ∀ i, ψ.comp (of β i) = ψ'.comp (of β i))
theorem to_module.ext (f : direct_sum R ι β) : ψ f = ψ' f :=
direct_sum.induction_on f (ψ.map_zero.trans ψ'.map_zero.symm)
(λ i, linear_map.ext_iff.1 (H2 i)) $ λ f g ihf ihg,
by rw [ψ.map_add, ψ'.map_add, ihf, ihg]
def set_to_set (S T : set ι) (H : S ⊆ T) :
direct_sum R S (β ∘ subtype.val) →ₗ direct_sum R T (β ∘ subtype.val) :=
to_module $ λ i, of (β ∘ @subtype.val _ T) ⟨i.1, H i.2⟩
protected def id (M : Type v) [add_comm_group M] [module R M] :
direct_sum R punit (λ _, M) ≃ₗ M :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (to_module $ λ _, linear_map.id) (of (λ _, M) punit.star)
(linear_map.ext $ λ x, to_module.of _ _)
(linear_map.ext $ to_module.ext $ λ ⟨⟩, linear_map.ext $ λ m, by dsimp; rw to_module.of; refl)
instance : has_coe_to_fun (direct_sum R ι β) :=
dfinsupp.has_coe_to_fun
end direct_sum |
81c0d673660728afeb89f16651c6ac3a59a66d90 | d7189ea2ef694124821b033e533f18905b5e87ef | /galois/data/lptree_to_tree.lean | 945e1a1f1797af9ad34cfb1f7eb9fa8f1d43a5f0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | digama0/lean-protocol-support | eaa7e6f8b8e0d5bbfff1f7f52bfb79a3b11b0f59 | cabfa3abedbdd6fdca6e2da6fbbf91a13ed48dda | refs/heads/master | 1,625,421,450,627 | 1,506,035,462,000 | 1,506,035,462,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,407 | lean | import .lptree .binary_tree
galois.option
namespace binary_tree
def twice {A} (f : A -> A -> A)
(x y : A × A) : A × A :=
let (a, b) := x in let (p, q) := y in
(f a b, f p q)
def untwice_tree {A} (f : A -> A -> A)
: tree (A × A) -> tree A
| (tree.leaf (x, y)) := tree.node (f x y) (tree.leaf x) (tree.leaf y)
| (tree.node (x, y) l r) := tree.node (f x y) (untwice_tree l) (untwice_tree r)
lemma untwice_tree_height {A} (f : A → A → A)
(x : tree (A × A))
: (untwice_tree f x).height = x.height + 1
:= begin
induction x; induction item; dsimp [untwice_tree, tree.height],
{ rw nat.max_same, },
{ rw ih_1, rw ih_2, clear ih_1 ih_2 fst snd,
f_equal, rw nat.max_add,
}
end
/-- Compute a list of left subtrees, starting with the furthest
down
-/
def lptree_to_tree_helper
: ∀ {A}, (A -> A -> A) -> lptree A -> list (tree A)
| A f lptree.nil := []
| A f (lptree.cons mx t') := (match mx with
| some x := list.cons (tree.leaf x)
| none := λ zs, zs
end)
(list.map (untwice_tree f) (lptree_to_tree_helper (twice f) t'))
def lptree_to_tree_helper_option
: ∀ {A}, (A -> A -> A) -> lptree A -> list (option (tree A))
| A f lptree.nil := []
| A f (lptree.cons mx t') := list.cons
(option.map tree.leaf mx)
(list.map (option.map (untwice_tree f)) (lptree_to_tree_helper_option (twice f) t'))
def asc_heights : ℕ → list ℕ → ℕ
| n [] := n
| n (x :: xs) := asc_heights(max x n + 1) xs
def max_tree_list_height {A : Type} (x : tree A) (xs : list (tree A)) : ℕ
:= asc_heights x.height (xs.map tree.height)
lemma tree_height_untwice_tree {A} (f : A → A → A) :
(tree.height ∘ untwice_tree f) = (nat.succ ∘ tree.height)
:= begin
apply funext, intros x; dsimp [function.comp],
rw untwice_tree_height,
end
lemma asc_heights_helper_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n)
(xs : list ℕ)
: asc_heights m xs ≤ asc_heights n xs
:= begin
revert m n,
induction xs; intros; dsimp [asc_heights], assumption,
apply ih_1, apply nat.add_le_add_right, apply nat.max_mono,
apply nat.le_refl, assumption,
end
lemma asc_heights_succ (n : ℕ) (xs : list ℕ)
: asc_heights n.succ (xs.map nat.succ) ≤ (asc_heights n xs).succ
:= begin
revert n;
induction xs; intros; dsimp [asc_heights],
{ constructor, },
{ repeat { rw ← nat.add_one },
rw nat.max_add, apply le_trans, apply ih_1,
rw ← nat.add_one,
}
end
/-- Given a rightmost subtree, and a list of left subtrees
starting from furthest toward the rightmost subtree and
moving towards the root, assemble them into a single tree.
-/
def assemble_left_subtrees {A} (f : A -> A -> A)
: tree A -> list (tree A) -> tree A
| x [] := x
| x (y :: ys) := assemble_left_subtrees (combine f y x) ys
/-- Convert a left-perfect tree to a binary tree with internal
nodes, using the function `f` to produce internal nodes
from the roots of the corresponding subtrees. Since lptrees
may be empty, but trees may not, we return `none` exactly
when the lptree is empty.
-/
def lptree_to_tree {A} (f : A -> A -> A)
(t : lptree A) : option (tree A) :=
match lptree_to_tree_helper f t with
| [] := none
| (x :: xs) := some (assemble_left_subtrees f x xs)
end
def assemble_left_subtrees_option {A} (f : A → A → A) : list (option (tree A)) → option (tree A)
| [] := none
| (none :: xs) := assemble_left_subtrees_option xs
| (some x :: xs) := some (assemble_left_subtrees f x xs.filter_some)
def lptree_to_tree_option {A} (f : A -> A -> A)
(t : lptree A) : option (tree A) :=
assemble_left_subtrees_option f (lptree_to_tree_helper_option f t)
lemma lptree.nonzero_subtrees {A} (t : lptree A)
(f : A -> A -> A)
(H : lptree_to_tree_helper f t ≠ [])
: option.Issome (lptree_to_tree f t)
:=
begin
unfold lptree_to_tree,
revert H,
destruct (lptree_to_tree_helper f t); intros,
{ contradiction },
{ clear H, rw a_2, simp [lptree_to_tree._match_1], constructor }
end
lemma lptree.nonzero_tree {A} (t : lptree A)
(f : A -> A -> A)
(tnonzero : lptree.nonzero t)
: option.Issome (lptree_to_tree f t) :=
begin
apply lptree.nonzero_subtrees,
induction tnonzero with A x t A ma t tnonzero IHtnonzero,
{ dsimp, simp [lptree_to_tree_helper], },
{ simp [lptree_to_tree_helper],
cases ma; simp [lptree_to_tree_helper._match_1],
{ apply list.map_not_nil, apply IHtnonzero },
}
end
def merge_to_tree {A} (f : A -> A -> A)
(xs : list A) : option (tree A)
:= lptree_to_tree f (list_to_lptree xs)
lemma list_to_tree_Some {A} (xs : list A)
(f) (H : xs ≠ [])
: option.Issome (merge_to_tree f xs)
:=
begin
apply lptree.nonzero_tree,
apply list_to_lptree.nonzero,
assumption
end
lemma lptree_to_tree_helper_nonempty_nonzero {A}
(f : A -> A -> A)
(t : lptree A)
(H : lptree_to_tree_helper f t ≠ [])
: lptree.nonzero t :=
begin
induction t,
{ contradiction },
{ cases a,
{ simp [lptree_to_tree_helper] at H, constructor,
apply ih_1, intros contra, apply H,
apply list.map_nil, apply contra },
{ constructor }
}
end
lemma assemble_left_subtrees_height {A : Type}
(f : A → A → A) (x : tree A) (xs : list (tree A))
: (assemble_left_subtrees f x xs).height = max_tree_list_height x xs
:= begin
revert x,
unfold max_tree_list_height,
induction xs; intros;
dsimp [tree.height, assemble_left_subtrees, asc_heights],
{ reflexivity },
{ rw ih_1, rw combine_height, }
end
lemma asc_heights_lemma1 (xs : list ℕ) (n : ℕ)
: asc_heights n (list.map nat.succ xs)
≤ asc_heights n xs + 1
:= begin
apply le_trans, tactic.swap,
apply asc_heights_succ,
apply asc_heights_helper_mono,
constructor, constructor,
end
def opt_default {A} (default : A) : option A → A
| (some x) := x
| none := default
lemma asc_heights_filter_some1 {A} (n : ℕ) (xs : list (option (tree A))) :
asc_heights n (list.map tree.height xs.filter_some) ≤
asc_heights n
(list.map (opt_default 0 ∘ option.map tree.height) xs)
:= begin
revert n,
induction xs; intros; dsimp [asc_heights, list.map, list.filter_some],
{ apply le_refl },
{ induction a; dsimp [list.filter_some],
{ apply le_trans, apply ih_1,
apply asc_heights_helper_mono,
apply le_trans, tactic.swap, apply nat.le_add_r,
apply le_max_right, },
{ dsimp [asc_heights], apply le_trans,
apply ih_1,
apply asc_heights_helper_mono,
apply nat.add_le_add_right,
apply nat.max_mono,
{ apply le_refl },
{ apply le_refl }
}
}
end
lemma asc_heights_filter_some {A} (n : ℕ) (xs : list (option (tree A))) :
asc_heights n (list.map tree.height xs.filter_some) ≤
asc_heights (n + 1)
(list.map (opt_default 0 ∘ option.map tree.height) xs)
:= begin
apply le_trans, apply asc_heights_filter_some1,
apply asc_heights_helper_mono, constructor, constructor,
end
lemma assemble_left_subtrees_option_height {A : Type}
(f : A → A → A) (xs : list (option (tree A)))
: (match assemble_left_subtrees_option f xs with
| none := true
| some t := t.height ≤ asc_heights 0 (list.map (opt_default 0 ∘ option.map tree.height) xs)
end : Prop)
:= begin
destruct (assemble_left_subtrees_option f xs),
{ intros Hnone, rw Hnone, dsimp, constructor, },
{ intros t Ht, rw Ht, dsimp,
revert t, induction xs; intros; dsimp [list.map, asc_heights],
{ dsimp [assemble_left_subtrees_option] at Ht, contradiction, },
{ induction a,
{ dsimp [assemble_left_subtrees_option] at Ht,
specialize (ih_1 _ Ht), apply le_trans, assumption,
apply asc_heights_helper_mono, apply nat.zero_le,
},
{ dsimp [assemble_left_subtrees_option] at Ht,
injection Ht with Ht', clear Ht,
subst t,
rw assemble_left_subtrees_height,
clear ih_1,
unfold max_tree_list_height,
apply le_trans, apply asc_heights_filter_some,
apply asc_heights_helper_mono,
dsimp [option.map, opt_default, option.bind, function.comp],
rw nat.max_0_r,
}
}
}
end
lemma asc_heights_list_mono_lemma (n : ℕ) (xs : list (option ℕ)) :
asc_heights n (xs.map (opt_default 0 ∘ option.map nat.succ))
≤ asc_heights n (xs.map (nat.succ ∘ opt_default 0))
:= begin
revert n,
induction xs; intros; dsimp [list.map, asc_heights],
{ apply nat.le_refl, },
{ apply le_trans, apply ih_1,
apply asc_heights_helper_mono,
apply nat.add_le_add_right,
apply nat.max_mono,
{ dsimp [function.comp], induction a;
dsimp [option.map, option.bind, opt_default],
apply nat.zero_le, apply nat.le_refl },
{ apply le_refl }
}
end
lemma asc_heights_succ_option (n : ℕ) (xs : list (option ℕ))
: asc_heights n.succ (xs.map (opt_default 0 ∘ option.map nat.succ))
≤ (asc_heights n (xs.map (opt_default 0))).succ
:= begin
revert n;
induction xs; intros; dsimp [asc_heights],
{ constructor, },
{ repeat { rw nat.add_one },
apply le_trans, apply ih_1,
apply nat.succ_le_succ, apply asc_heights_helper_mono,
repeat { rw ← nat.add_one }, rw ← nat.max_add,
apply nat.max_mono,
{ induction a; dsimp [opt_default, function.comp, option.map, option.bind],
apply nat.zero_le, apply le_refl,
},
{ apply le_refl }
}
end
lemma stupid_lemma {A} (a : A)
: ((opt_default 0 ∘ option.map tree.height) ((some ∘ tree.leaf) a))
= 0 := rfl
lemma asc_heights_lemma {A : Type}
(f : A → A → A) (t : lptree A)
: asc_heights 0 (list.map (opt_default 0 ∘ option.map tree.height) (lptree_to_tree_helper_option f t))
≤ lptree.height t
:= begin
induction t; dsimp [lptree_to_tree_helper_option, lptree.height, asc_heights],
{ apply nat.zero_le, },
{ rw ← list.map_compose,
rw function.comp.assoc
(opt_default 0) (option.map tree.height) (option.map (untwice_tree f)),
rw ← option.map_compose,
rw tree_height_untwice_tree,
rw option.map_compose (tree.height) (nat.succ),
rw ← function.comp.assoc
(opt_default 0) (option.map nat.succ) (option.map tree.height),
rw list.map_compose,
apply le_trans, apply asc_heights_list_mono_lemma,
rw ← list.map_compose,
rw function.comp.assoc
(nat.succ) (opt_default 0) (option.map tree.height),
rw list.map_compose,
repeat { rw nat.add_one },
apply le_trans,
apply asc_heights_succ,
apply nat.succ_le_succ,
induction a; dsimp [option.map, option.bind
, lptree_to_tree_helper_option, lptree.height
, asc_heights],
{
apply ih_1,
},
{ rw stupid_lemma,
dsimp [max], rw (if_pos (le_refl 0)),
apply ih_1,
}
}
end
lemma lptree_to_tree_option_height
{A : Type}
(f : A → A → A) (lpt : lptree A)
: (match lptree_to_tree_option f lpt with
| none := true
| some t := t.height ≤ lpt.height
end : Prop)
:= begin
destruct (lptree_to_tree_option f lpt),
{ intros Hnone, rw Hnone, dsimp, constructor },
{ intros t Ht, rw Ht, dsimp,
unfold lptree_to_tree_option at Ht,
have H := assemble_left_subtrees_option_height
f (lptree_to_tree_helper_option f lpt),
rw Ht at H, dsimp at H,
apply le_trans, assumption,
apply asc_heights_lemma,
}
end
lemma lptree_to_tree_helper_option_equiv
{A : Type}
(f : A → A → A) (lpt : lptree A)
: lptree_to_tree_helper f lpt
= (lptree_to_tree_helper_option f lpt).filter_some
:= begin
induction lpt;
dsimp [lptree_to_tree_helper, lptree_to_tree_helper_option, list.filter_some],
{ reflexivity },
{ induction a;
dsimp [option.map, option.bind, lptree_to_tree_helper
, lptree_to_tree_helper_option, list.filter_some],
{ rw list.map_filter_some, f_equal,
apply ih_1, },
{ f_equal, rw list.map_filter_some, f_equal, apply ih_1 }
}
end
lemma assemble_left_subtrees_option_filter_some
{A : Type} (f : A → A → A)
(xs : list (option (tree A)))
: assemble_left_subtrees_option f xs = match xs.filter_some with
| [] := none
| (y :: ys) := some (assemble_left_subtrees f y ys)
end
:= begin
induction xs; dsimp [list.filter_some, assemble_left_subtrees_option],
{ reflexivity },
{ rename a x, induction x; dsimp [list.filter_some, assemble_left_subtrees_option],
{ rw ih_1, },
{ reflexivity }
}
end
lemma lptree_to_tree_option_equiv
{A : Type}
(f : A → A → A) (lpt : lptree A)
: lptree_to_tree_option f lpt = lptree_to_tree f lpt
:= begin
unfold lptree_to_tree_option lptree_to_tree,
rw assemble_left_subtrees_option_filter_some,
destruct (lptree_to_tree_helper f lpt),
{ intros Hnone, rw Hnone, dsimp [lptree_to_tree],
rw lptree_to_tree_helper_option_equiv at Hnone,
rw Hnone,
},
{ intros t ts Hts, rw Hts, dsimp [lptree_to_tree],
rw lptree_to_tree_helper_option_equiv at Hts,
rw Hts,
}
end
lemma lptree_to_tree_some_nonzero {A}
(f : A -> A -> A)
(t : lptree A) :
∀ (x : tree A) (H : lptree_to_tree f t = some x), lptree.nonzero t :=
begin
intros, apply (lptree_to_tree_helper_nonempty_nonzero f),
unfold lptree_to_tree at H,
intros contra,
rw contra at H,
simp [lptree_to_tree._match_1] at H,
contradiction
end
lemma assemble_left_subtrees_preserves_nodes
{A} (f : A -> A -> A) (xs : list (tree A))
(Hxs : list.Forall (internal_nodes_ok f) xs)
: ∀ (x : tree A) (Hx : internal_nodes_ok f x),
internal_nodes_ok f (assemble_left_subtrees f x xs)
:=
begin
induction Hxs; intros,
{ simp [assemble_left_subtrees], assumption },
{ simp [assemble_left_subtrees],
apply ih_1, apply internal_nodes_ok_combine,
assumption, assumption }
end
lemma assemble_left_subtrees_preserves_leaves
{A} (f : A -> A -> A) (xs : list (tree A))
: ∀ (x : tree A),
(assemble_left_subtrees f x xs).leaves
= left_subtrees_leaves f xs x :=
begin
induction xs; intros,
{ reflexivity },
{ simp [assemble_left_subtrees],
rw ih_1,
reflexivity
}
end
lemma congr_arg2_pair {A B C} (f : A -> B -> C)
(a a' : A) (b b' : B)
: (a, b) = (a', b') -> f a b = f a' b'
:=
begin
intros H, injection H,
subst a,
subst b
end
lemma root_untwice_tree {A} (f : A -> A -> A) (t : tree (A × A))
: forall (x y : A) (Hroot : root t = (x, y))
, f x y = root (untwice_tree f t) :=
begin
induction t; intros,
{ simp [root] at Hroot,
rw Hroot,
simp [untwice_tree],
reflexivity,
},
{ simp [root] at Hroot,
rw Hroot,
simp [untwice_tree],
reflexivity
}
end
lemma root_untwice_tree' {A} (f : A -> A -> A) (l r : tree (A × A))
: twice f (root l) (root r)
= (root (untwice_tree f l), root (untwice_tree f r))
:=
begin
generalize Ql : (root l) = Pl,
cases Pl,
generalize Qr : (root r) = Pr,
cases Pr,
simp [twice],
apply and.intro,
all_goals { apply root_untwice_tree, assumption, },
end
lemma internal_nodes_ok_twice {A}
(f : A -> A -> A) (x : tree (A × A))
(H : internal_nodes_ok (twice f) x)
: internal_nodes_ok f (untwice_tree f x)
:=
begin
induction x,
{ cases item, simp [untwice_tree],
constructor, constructor, constructor, reflexivity
},
{ cases item, simp [untwice_tree], constructor,
{ apply ih_1, clear ih_1 ih_2,
generalize Q : (tree.node (fst, snd) l r) = P,
rw Q at H, revert fst snd l r Q,
induction H; intros,
{ contradiction },
{ injection Q, subst l_1, assumption }
},
{ apply ih_2, clear ih_1 ih_2,
generalize Q : (tree.node (fst, snd) l r) = P,
rw Q at H, revert fst snd l r Q,
induction H; intros,
{ contradiction },
{ injection Q, subst r_1, assumption }
},
{ clear ih_1 ih_2,
generalize Q : (tree.node (fst, snd) l r) = P,
rw Q at H, revert fst snd l r Q,
induction H; intros,
{ contradiction },
{ subst x, injection Q with h, subst l_1, subst r_1,
clear Q, generalize Y : (root l) = X,
apply congr_arg2_pair, rw h,
apply root_untwice_tree' }
},
}
end
lemma internal_nodes_ok_lptree_to_tree_helper
{A} (f : A -> A -> A) (t : lptree A)
: list.Forall (internal_nodes_ok f)
(lptree_to_tree_helper f t) :=
begin
induction t,
{ simp [lptree_to_tree_helper],
constructor },
{ simp [lptree_to_tree_helper],
cases a,
{ simp [lptree_to_tree_helper._match_1],
specialize (ih_1 (twice f)),
apply list.map_Forall,
apply list.impl_Forall,
{ assumption },
{ intros, apply internal_nodes_ok_twice, apply a }
},
{ simp [lptree_to_tree_helper._match_1],
constructor,
{ constructor },
{ apply list.map_Forall,
apply list.impl_Forall,
{ apply ih_1 },
{ intros, apply internal_nodes_ok_twice, assumption }
}
}
}
end
/-- If we convert an lptree to a tree, producing internal
nodes with f, indeed all the internal nodes are the
result of applying f to the roots of their subtrees.
-/
theorem lptree_nodes_spec {A} (t : lptree A)
(f : A -> A -> A)
: (match lptree_to_tree f t with
| (some t') := internal_nodes_ok f t'
| none := true
end : Prop)
:=
begin
generalize Q : (lptree_to_tree f t) = P,
cases P,
{ dsimp, constructor },
{ dsimp,
generalize W : (lptree_to_tree_helper f t) = Z,
cases Z,
{ unfold lptree_to_tree at Q,
rewrite W at Q,
simp [lptree_to_tree._match_1] at Q,
contradiction },
{ unfold lptree_to_tree at Q,
rewrite W at Q,
simp [lptree_to_tree._match_1] at Q,
injection Q with Q', clear Q, subst a,
have H := internal_nodes_ok_lptree_to_tree_helper f t,
rw W at H,
clear W,
apply_in H list.Forall_invert,
dsimp at H,
induction H,
apply assemble_left_subtrees_preserves_nodes;
assumption
}
}
end
lemma depair_app {A} (xs ys : list (A × A))
: depair (xs ++ ys) = depair xs ++ depair ys
:=
begin
induction xs,
{ reflexivity },
{ cases a,
simp [depair],
rw ih_1 }
end
lemma depair_tree_leaves {A} (f : A -> A -> A)
(t : tree (A × A))
: depair t.leaves = (untwice_tree f t).leaves
:=
begin
induction t,
{ cases item, simp [tree.leaves, untwice_tree],
simp [depair]
},
{ simp [tree.leaves],
rw depair_app,
rw [ih_1, ih_2],
cases item with i1 i2,
simp [untwice_tree],
simp [tree.leaves] }
end
lemma depair_leaves {A} (f : A -> A -> A)
(xs : list (tree (A × A)))
: depair (left_subtrees_leaves' xs) =
left_subtrees_leaves' (list.map (untwice_tree f) xs)
:=
begin
induction xs,
{ reflexivity },
{ simp [left_subtrees_leaves'],
rw depair_app,
f_equal,
apply depair_tree_leaves,
assumption }
end
lemma lptree.leaves_helper_same' {A} (f) (t : lptree A)
: t.leaves
= left_subtrees_leaves' (lptree_to_tree_helper f t) :=
begin
induction t,
{ reflexivity },
{ simp [lptree.leaves],
simp [lptree_to_tree_helper],
cases a,
{ simp [lptree.leaves],
simp [lptree_to_tree_helper],
rw (ih_1 (twice f)),
rw depair_leaves,
},
{ simp [lptree.leaves],
simp [lptree_to_tree_helper],
simp [left_subtrees_leaves'],
simp only [tree.leaves],
f_equal,
rw (ih_1 (twice f)),
apply depair_leaves },
}
end
lemma lptree.leaves_helper_same {A} (f) (t : lptree A)
: t.leaves
= match lptree_to_tree_helper f t with
| [] := []
| x :: xs := left_subtrees_leaves f xs x
end :=
begin
simp,
rw (lptree.leaves_helper_same' f),
generalize : (lptree_to_tree_helper f t) = xs,
intros,
cases xs,
{ reflexivity },
{ dsimp,
symmetry,
apply left_subtrees_leaves_same }
end
/-- If we compute the leaves of an lptree, it is the same
as if we convert it to a binary tree and then compute
the leaves
-/
lemma tree_lptree.leaves {A} (f) (t : lptree A)
: t.leaves = tree_leaves_option (lptree_to_tree f t)
:=
begin
generalize P : (lptree_to_tree f t) = Q,
cases Q,
{ simp [tree_leaves_option],
cases (lptree.nonzero_dec t),
apply lptree_not_nonzero_no_leaves,
assumption,
cases t,
reflexivity,
exfalso,
have H' := lptree.nonzero_tree _ f a,
rw P at H',
apply (@option.not_Issome_none (tree A)),
assumption
},
{ simp [tree_leaves_option],
generalize W : (lptree_to_tree_helper f t) = Z,
cases Z,
{ unfold lptree_to_tree at P,
rewrite W at P,
simp [lptree_to_tree._match_1] at P,
contradiction },
{ unfold lptree_to_tree at P,
rewrite W at P,
simp [lptree_to_tree._match_1] at P,
injection P, clear P,
subst a,
rw assemble_left_subtrees_preserves_leaves,
rw (lptree.leaves_helper_same f),
simp, rw W }
}
end
/-- If we take a list, convert it to an lptree, convert
that to a binary tree, and compute the leaves,
we get back the original list
-/
lemma lptree.leaves_ok {A} (f : A -> A -> A) (xs : list A)
: xs = tree_leaves_option (merge_to_tree f xs) :=
begin
transitivity,
rw ← (lptree_leaves_list xs),
unfold merge_to_tree,
rw (tree_lptree.leaves f)
end
--#eval (lptree_to_tree nat.add (list_to_lptree [7,6,5,4,3,2,1]))
end binary_tree |
193de8a1f6cd9a74aadbf186e9c03f6c363f327d | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /scripts/required_imports.lean | 842868dac3c5df79b60b6873073b2ffe7f255a98 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 950 | lean | import all
import system.io
meta def decls_used_in : declaration → name_set → name_set
| d ns :=
let process (v : expr) : name_set :=
v.fold ns $ λ e _ ns, if e.is_constant then ns.insert e.const_name else ns in
match d with
| (declaration.defn _ _ _ v _ _) := process v
| (declaration.thm _ _ _ v) := process v.get
| _ := ns
end
meta def main : io unit := do
env ← io.run_tactic tactic.get_env,
let map := env.fold (native.rb_map.mk string name_set) (λ d map,
match env.decl_olean d.to_name with
| some tgt := map.insert tgt (decls_used_in d ((map.find tgt).get_or_else mk_name_set))
| none := map
end),
map.mfold () $ λ mod ns _, do
io.print_ln sformat!"module: {mod}",
let mods := ns.fold (native.mk_rb_set) (λ n mods, match env.decl_olean n with
| some tgt := mods.insert tgt
| none := mods
end),
mods.mfold () $ λ mod _, do
io.print_ln sformat!"needs: {mod}"
|
85592d90721b6fda6255f3ced043fe0b615fbcb9 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/measure_theory/measurable_space.lean | 0081573eea32f894b17415787fb1c2edddc98ced | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 52,571 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.set.disjointed
import data.set.countable
import data.indicator_function
import data.equiv.encodable.lattice
import data.tprod
import order.filter.lift
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file defines measurable spaces and the functions and isomorphisms
between them.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of
subsets closed under complementation and countable union. A function
between measurable spaces is measurable if the preimage of each
measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order
σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂` if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is
also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`). In particular, any
collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which
contains all of them. A function `f : α → β` induces a Galois connection
between the lattices of σ-algebras on `α` and `β`.
A measurable equivalence between measurable spaces is an equivalence
which respects the σ-algebras, that is, for which both directions of
the equivalence are measurable functions.
We say that a filter `f` is measurably generated if every set `s ∈ f` includes a measurable
set `t ∈ f`. This property is useful, e.g., to extract a measurable witness of `filter.eventually`.
## Notation
* We write `α ≃ᵐ β` for measurable equivalences between the measurable spaces `α` and `β`.
This should not be confused with `≃ₘ` which is used for diffeomorphisms between manifolds.
## Implementation notes
Measurability of a function `f : α → β` between measurable spaces is
defined in terms of the Galois connection induced by f.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function, measurable equivalence, dynkin system,
π-λ theorem, π-system
-/
open set encodable function equiv
open_locale classical filter
variables {α β γ δ δ' : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {s t u : set α}
/-- A measurable space is a space equipped with a σ-algebra. -/
structure measurable_space (α : Type*) :=
(measurable_set' : set α → Prop)
(measurable_set_empty : measurable_set' ∅)
(measurable_set_compl : ∀ s, measurable_set' s → measurable_set' sᶜ)
(measurable_set_Union : ∀ f : ℕ → set α, (∀ i, measurable_set' (f i)) → measurable_set' (⋃ i, f i))
attribute [class] measurable_space
instance [h : measurable_space α] : measurable_space (order_dual α) := h
section
variable [measurable_space α]
/-- `measurable_set s` means that `s` is measurable (in the ambient measure space on `α`) -/
def measurable_set : set α → Prop := ‹measurable_space α›.measurable_set'
@[simp] lemma measurable_set.empty : measurable_set (∅ : set α) :=
‹measurable_space α›.measurable_set_empty
lemma measurable_set.compl : measurable_set s → measurable_set sᶜ :=
‹measurable_space α›.measurable_set_compl s
lemma measurable_set.of_compl (h : measurable_set sᶜ) : measurable_set s :=
compl_compl s ▸ h.compl
@[simp] lemma measurable_set.compl_iff : measurable_set sᶜ ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨measurable_set.of_compl, measurable_set.compl⟩
@[simp] lemma measurable_set.univ : measurable_set (univ : set α) :=
by simpa using (@measurable_set.empty α _).compl
@[nontriviality] lemma subsingleton.measurable_set [subsingleton α] {s : set α} :
measurable_set s :=
subsingleton.set_cases measurable_set.empty measurable_set.univ s
lemma measurable_set.congr {s t : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) (h : s = t) :
measurable_set t :=
by rwa ← h
lemma measurable_set.bUnion_decode2 [encodable β] ⦃f : β → set α⦄ (h : ∀ b, measurable_set (f b))
(n : ℕ) : measurable_set (⋃ b ∈ decode2 β n, f b) :=
encodable.Union_decode2_cases measurable_set.empty h
lemma measurable_set.Union [encodable β] ⦃f : β → set α⦄ (h : ∀ b, measurable_set (f b)) :
measurable_set (⋃ b, f b) :=
begin
rw ← encodable.Union_decode2,
exact ‹measurable_space α›.measurable_set_Union _ (measurable_set.bUnion_decode2 h)
end
lemma measurable_set.bUnion {f : β → set α} {s : set β} (hs : countable s)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, measurable_set (f b)) : measurable_set (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) :=
begin
rw bUnion_eq_Union,
haveI := hs.to_encodable,
exact measurable_set.Union (by simpa using h)
end
lemma set.finite.measurable_set_bUnion {f : β → set α} {s : set β} (hs : finite s)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, measurable_set (f b)) :
measurable_set (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) :=
measurable_set.bUnion hs.countable h
lemma finset.measurable_set_bUnion {f : β → set α} (s : finset β)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, measurable_set (f b)) :
measurable_set (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) :=
s.finite_to_set.measurable_set_bUnion h
lemma measurable_set.sUnion {s : set (set α)} (hs : countable s) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, measurable_set t) :
measurable_set (⋃₀ s) :=
by { rw sUnion_eq_bUnion, exact measurable_set.bUnion hs h }
lemma set.finite.measurable_set_sUnion {s : set (set α)} (hs : finite s)
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, measurable_set t) :
measurable_set (⋃₀ s) :=
measurable_set.sUnion hs.countable h
lemma measurable_set.Union_Prop {p : Prop} {f : p → set α} (hf : ∀ b, measurable_set (f b)) :
measurable_set (⋃ b, f b) :=
by { by_cases p; simp [h, hf, measurable_set.empty] }
lemma measurable_set.Inter [encodable β] {f : β → set α} (h : ∀ b, measurable_set (f b)) :
measurable_set (⋂ b, f b) :=
measurable_set.compl_iff.1 $
by { rw compl_Inter, exact measurable_set.Union (λ b, (h b).compl) }
section fintype
local attribute [instance] fintype.encodable
lemma measurable_set.Union_fintype [fintype β] {f : β → set α} (h : ∀ b, measurable_set (f b)) :
measurable_set (⋃ b, f b) :=
measurable_set.Union h
lemma measurable_set.Inter_fintype [fintype β] {f : β → set α} (h : ∀ b, measurable_set (f b)) :
measurable_set (⋂ b, f b) :=
measurable_set.Inter h
end fintype
lemma measurable_set.bInter {f : β → set α} {s : set β} (hs : countable s)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, measurable_set (f b)) : measurable_set (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
measurable_set.compl_iff.1 $
by { rw compl_bInter, exact measurable_set.bUnion hs (λ b hb, (h b hb).compl) }
lemma set.finite.measurable_set_bInter {f : β → set α} {s : set β} (hs : finite s)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, measurable_set (f b)) : measurable_set (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
measurable_set.bInter hs.countable h
lemma finset.measurable_set_bInter {f : β → set α} (s : finset β)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, measurable_set (f b)) : measurable_set (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
s.finite_to_set.measurable_set_bInter h
lemma measurable_set.sInter {s : set (set α)} (hs : countable s) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, measurable_set t) :
measurable_set (⋂₀ s) :=
by { rw sInter_eq_bInter, exact measurable_set.bInter hs h }
lemma set.finite.measurable_set_sInter {s : set (set α)} (hs : finite s)
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, measurable_set t) : measurable_set (⋂₀ s) :=
measurable_set.sInter hs.countable h
lemma measurable_set.Inter_Prop {p : Prop} {f : p → set α} (hf : ∀ b, measurable_set (f b)) :
measurable_set (⋂ b, f b) :=
by { by_cases p; simp [h, hf, measurable_set.univ] }
@[simp] lemma measurable_set.union {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h₁ : measurable_set s₁)
(h₂ : measurable_set s₂) :
measurable_set (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
by { rw union_eq_Union, exact measurable_set.Union (bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩) }
@[simp] lemma measurable_set.inter {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h₁ : measurable_set s₁)
(h₂ : measurable_set s₂) :
measurable_set (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by { rw inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl, exact (h₁.compl.union h₂.compl).compl }
@[simp] lemma measurable_set.diff {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h₁ : measurable_set s₁)
(h₂ : measurable_set s₂) :
measurable_set (s₁ \ s₂) :=
h₁.inter h₂.compl
@[simp] lemma measurable_set.disjointed {f : ℕ → set α} (h : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (n) :
measurable_set (disjointed f n) :=
disjointed_induct (h n) (assume t i ht, measurable_set.diff ht $ h _)
@[simp] lemma measurable_set.const (p : Prop) : measurable_set {a : α | p} :=
by { by_cases p; simp [h, measurable_set.empty]; apply measurable_set.univ }
/-- Every set has a measurable superset. Declare this as local instance as needed. -/
lemma nonempty_measurable_superset (s : set α) : nonempty { t // s ⊆ t ∧ measurable_set t} :=
⟨⟨univ, subset_univ s, measurable_set.univ⟩⟩
end
@[ext] lemma measurable_space.ext : ∀ {m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α},
(∀ s : set α, m₁.measurable_set' s ↔ m₂.measurable_set' s) → m₁ = m₂
| ⟨s₁, _, _, _⟩ ⟨s₂, _, _, _⟩ h :=
have s₁ = s₂, from funext $ assume x, propext $ h x,
by subst this
@[ext] lemma measurable_space.ext_iff {m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} :
m₁ = m₂ ↔ (∀ s : set α, m₁.measurable_set' s ↔ m₂.measurable_set' s) :=
⟨by { unfreezingI {rintro rfl}, intro s, refl }, measurable_space.ext⟩
/-- A typeclass mixin for `measurable_space`s such that each singleton is measurable. -/
class measurable_singleton_class (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : Prop :=
(measurable_set_singleton : ∀ x, measurable_set ({x} : set α))
export measurable_singleton_class (measurable_set_singleton)
attribute [simp] measurable_set_singleton
section measurable_singleton_class
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_singleton_class α]
lemma measurable_set_eq {a : α} : measurable_set {x | x = a} :=
measurable_set_singleton a
lemma measurable_set.insert {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) (a : α) :
measurable_set (insert a s) :=
(measurable_set_singleton a).union hs
@[simp] lemma measurable_set_insert {a : α} {s : set α} :
measurable_set (insert a s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨λ h, if ha : a ∈ s then by rwa ← insert_eq_of_mem ha
else insert_diff_self_of_not_mem ha ▸ h.diff (measurable_set_singleton _),
λ h, h.insert a⟩
lemma set.finite.measurable_set {s : set α} (hs : finite s) : measurable_set s :=
finite.induction_on hs measurable_set.empty $ λ a s ha hsf hsm, hsm.insert _
protected lemma finset.measurable_set (s : finset α) : measurable_set (↑s : set α) :=
s.finite_to_set.measurable_set
end measurable_singleton_class
namespace measurable_space
section complete_lattice
instance : partial_order (measurable_space α) :=
{ le := λ m₁ m₂, m₁.measurable_set' ≤ m₂.measurable_set',
le_refl := assume a b, le_refl _,
le_trans := assume a b c, le_trans,
le_antisymm := assume a b h₁ h₂, measurable_space.ext $ assume s, ⟨h₁ s, h₂ s⟩ }
/-- The smallest σ-algebra containing a collection `s` of basic sets -/
inductive generate_measurable (s : set (set α)) : set α → Prop
| basic : ∀ u ∈ s, generate_measurable u
| empty : generate_measurable ∅
| compl : ∀ s, generate_measurable s → generate_measurable sᶜ
| union : ∀ f : ℕ → set α, (∀ n, generate_measurable (f n)) → generate_measurable (⋃ i, f i)
/-- Construct the smallest measure space containing a collection of basic sets -/
def generate_from (s : set (set α)) : measurable_space α :=
{ measurable_set' := generate_measurable s,
measurable_set_empty := generate_measurable.empty,
measurable_set_compl := generate_measurable.compl,
measurable_set_Union := generate_measurable.union }
lemma measurable_set_generate_from {s : set (set α)} {t : set α} (ht : t ∈ s) :
(generate_from s).measurable_set' t :=
generate_measurable.basic t ht
lemma generate_from_le {s : set (set α)} {m : measurable_space α}
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, m.measurable_set' t) : generate_from s ≤ m :=
assume t (ht : generate_measurable s t), ht.rec_on h
(measurable_set_empty m)
(assume s _ hs, measurable_set_compl m s hs)
(assume f _ hf, measurable_set_Union m f hf)
lemma generate_from_le_iff {s : set (set α)} (m : measurable_space α) :
generate_from s ≤ m ↔ s ⊆ {t | m.measurable_set' t} :=
iff.intro
(assume h u hu, h _ $ measurable_set_generate_from hu)
(assume h, generate_from_le h)
@[simp] lemma generate_from_measurable_set [measurable_space α] :
generate_from {s : set α | measurable_set s} = ‹_› :=
le_antisymm (generate_from_le $ λ _, id) $ λ s, measurable_set_generate_from
/-- If `g` is a collection of subsets of `α` such that the `σ`-algebra generated from `g` contains
the same sets as `g`, then `g` was already a `σ`-algebra. -/
protected def mk_of_closure (g : set (set α)) (hg : {t | (generate_from g).measurable_set' t} = g) :
measurable_space α :=
{ measurable_set' := λ s, s ∈ g,
measurable_set_empty := hg ▸ measurable_set_empty _,
measurable_set_compl := hg ▸ measurable_set_compl _,
measurable_set_Union := hg ▸ measurable_set_Union _ }
lemma mk_of_closure_sets {s : set (set α)}
{hs : {t | (generate_from s).measurable_set' t} = s} :
measurable_space.mk_of_closure s hs = generate_from s :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume t, show t ∈ s ↔ _, by { conv_lhs { rw [← hs] }, refl }
/-- We get a Galois insertion between `σ`-algebras on `α` and `set (set α)` by using `generate_from`
on one side and the collection of measurable sets on the other side. -/
def gi_generate_from : galois_insertion (@generate_from α) (λ m, {t | @measurable_set α m t}) :=
{ gc := assume s, generate_from_le_iff,
le_l_u := assume m s, measurable_set_generate_from,
choice :=
λ g hg, measurable_space.mk_of_closure g $ le_antisymm hg $ (generate_from_le_iff _).1 le_rfl,
choice_eq := assume g hg, mk_of_closure_sets }
instance : complete_lattice (measurable_space α) :=
gi_generate_from.lift_complete_lattice
instance : inhabited (measurable_space α) := ⟨⊤⟩
lemma measurable_set_bot_iff {s : set α} : @measurable_set α ⊥ s ↔ (s = ∅ ∨ s = univ) :=
let b : measurable_space α :=
{ measurable_set' := λ s, s = ∅ ∨ s = univ,
measurable_set_empty := or.inl rfl,
measurable_set_compl := by simp [or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt},
measurable_set_Union := assume f hf, classical.by_cases
(assume h : ∃i, f i = univ,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h in
or.inr $ eq_univ_of_univ_subset $ hi ▸ le_supr f i)
(assume h : ¬ ∃i, f i = univ,
or.inl $ eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ Union_subset $ assume i,
(hf i).elim (by simp {contextual := tt}) (assume hi, false.elim $ h ⟨i, hi⟩)) } in
have b = ⊥, from bot_unique $ assume s hs,
hs.elim (λ s, s.symm ▸ @measurable_set_empty _ ⊥) (λ s, s.symm ▸ @measurable_set.univ _ ⊥),
this ▸ iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem measurable_set_top {s : set α} : @measurable_set _ ⊤ s := trivial
@[simp] theorem measurable_set_inf {m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} {s : set α} :
@measurable_set _ (m₁ ⊓ m₂) s ↔ @measurable_set _ m₁ s ∧ @measurable_set _ m₂ s :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem measurable_set_Inf {ms : set (measurable_space α)} {s : set α} :
@measurable_set _ (Inf ms) s ↔ ∀ m ∈ ms, @measurable_set _ m s :=
show s ∈ (⋂ m ∈ ms, {t | @measurable_set _ m t }) ↔ _, by simp
@[simp] theorem measurable_set_infi {ι} {m : ι → measurable_space α} {s : set α} :
@measurable_set _ (infi m) s ↔ ∀ i, @measurable_set _ (m i) s :=
show s ∈ (λ m, {s | @measurable_set _ m s }) (infi m) ↔ _,
by { rw (@gi_generate_from α).gc.u_infi, simp }
theorem measurable_set_sup {m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} {s : set α} :
@measurable_set _ (m₁ ⊔ m₂) s ↔ generate_measurable (m₁.measurable_set' ∪ m₂.measurable_set') s :=
iff.refl _
theorem measurable_set_Sup {ms : set (measurable_space α)} {s : set α} :
@measurable_set _ (Sup ms) s ↔
generate_measurable {s : set α | ∃ m ∈ ms, @measurable_set _ m s} s :=
begin
change @measurable_set' _ (generate_from $ ⋃ m ∈ ms, _) _ ↔ _,
simp [generate_from, ← set_of_exists]
end
theorem measurable_set_supr {ι} {m : ι → measurable_space α} {s : set α} :
@measurable_set _ (supr m) s ↔
generate_measurable {s : set α | ∃ i, @measurable_set _ (m i) s} s :=
begin
convert @measurable_set_Sup _ (range m) s,
simp,
end
end complete_lattice
section functors
variables {m m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} {m' : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
/-- The forward image of a measure space under a function. `map f m` contains the sets `s : set β`
whose preimage under `f` is measurable. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (m : measurable_space α) : measurable_space β :=
{ measurable_set' := λ s, m.measurable_set' $ f ⁻¹' s,
measurable_set_empty := m.measurable_set_empty,
measurable_set_compl := assume s hs, m.measurable_set_compl _ hs,
measurable_set_Union := assume f hf, by { rw preimage_Union, exact m.measurable_set_Union _ hf }}
@[simp] lemma map_id : m.map id = m :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (m.map f).map g = m.map (g ∘ f) :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, iff.rfl
/-- The reverse image of a measure space under a function. `comap f m` contains the sets `s : set α`
such that `s` is the `f`-preimage of a measurable set in `β`. -/
protected def comap (f : α → β) (m : measurable_space β) : measurable_space α :=
{ measurable_set' := λ s, ∃s', m.measurable_set' s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s,
measurable_set_empty := ⟨∅, m.measurable_set_empty, rfl⟩,
measurable_set_compl := assume s ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨s'ᶜ, m.measurable_set_compl _ h₁, h₂ ▸ rfl⟩,
measurable_set_Union := assume s hs,
let ⟨s', hs'⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice hs in
⟨⋃ i, s' i, m.measurable_set_Union _ (λ i, (hs' i).left), by simp [hs'] ⟩ }
@[simp] lemma comap_id : m.comap id = m :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, ⟨assume ⟨s', hs', h⟩, h ▸ hs', assume h, ⟨s, h, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_comp {f : β → α} {g : γ → β} : (m.comap f).comap g = m.comap (f ∘ g) :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s,
⟨assume ⟨t, ⟨u, h, hu⟩, ht⟩, ⟨u, h, ht ▸ hu ▸ rfl⟩, assume ⟨t, h, ht⟩, ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, ht⟩⟩
lemma comap_le_iff_le_map {f : α → β} : m'.comap f ≤ m ↔ m' ≤ m.map f :=
⟨assume h s hs, h _ ⟨_, hs, rfl⟩, assume h s ⟨t, ht, heq⟩, heq ▸ h _ ht⟩
lemma gc_comap_map (f : α → β) :
galois_connection (measurable_space.comap f) (measurable_space.map f) :=
assume f g, comap_le_iff_le_map
lemma map_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.map f ≤ m₂.map f := (gc_comap_map f).monotone_u h
lemma monotone_map : monotone (measurable_space.map f) := assume a b h, map_mono h
lemma comap_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.comap g ≤ m₂.comap g := (gc_comap_map g).monotone_l h
lemma monotone_comap : monotone (measurable_space.comap g) := assume a b h, comap_mono h
@[simp] lemma comap_bot : (⊥ : measurable_space α).comap g = ⊥ := (gc_comap_map g).l_bot
@[simp] lemma comap_sup : (m₁ ⊔ m₂).comap g = m₁.comap g ⊔ m₂.comap g := (gc_comap_map g).l_sup
@[simp] lemma comap_supr {m : ι → measurable_space α} : (⨆i, m i).comap g = (⨆i, (m i).comap g) :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_supr
@[simp] lemma map_top : (⊤ : measurable_space α).map f = ⊤ := (gc_comap_map f).u_top
@[simp] lemma map_inf : (m₁ ⊓ m₂).map f = m₁.map f ⊓ m₂.map f := (gc_comap_map f).u_inf
@[simp] lemma map_infi {m : ι → measurable_space α} : (⨅i, m i).map f = (⨅i, (m i).map f) :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_infi
lemma comap_map_le : (m.map f).comap f ≤ m := (gc_comap_map f).l_u_le _
lemma le_map_comap : m ≤ (m.comap g).map g := (gc_comap_map g).le_u_l _
end functors
lemma generate_from_le_generate_from {s t : set (set α)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
generate_from s ≤ generate_from t :=
gi_generate_from.gc.monotone_l h
lemma generate_from_sup_generate_from {s t : set (set α)} :
generate_from s ⊔ generate_from t = generate_from (s ∪ t) :=
(@gi_generate_from α).gc.l_sup.symm
lemma comap_generate_from {f : α → β} {s : set (set β)} :
(generate_from s).comap f = generate_from (preimage f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ generate_from_le $ assume t hts,
generate_measurable.basic _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ $ hts)
(generate_from_le $ assume t ⟨u, hu, eq⟩, eq ▸ ⟨u, generate_measurable.basic _ hu, rfl⟩)
end measurable_space
section measurable_functions
open measurable_space
/-- A function `f` between measurable spaces is measurable if the preimage of every
measurable set is measurable. -/
def measurable [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃t : set β⦄, measurable_set t → measurable_set (f ⁻¹' t)
lemma measurable_iff_le_map {m₁ : measurable_space α} {m₂ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} :
measurable f ↔ m₂ ≤ m₁.map f :=
iff.rfl
alias measurable_iff_le_map ↔ measurable.le_map measurable.of_le_map
lemma measurable_iff_comap_le {m₁ : measurable_space α} {m₂ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} :
measurable f ↔ m₂.comap f ≤ m₁ :=
comap_le_iff_le_map.symm
alias measurable_iff_comap_le ↔ measurable.comap_le measurable.of_comap_le
lemma measurable.mono {ma ma' : measurable_space α} {mb mb' : measurable_space β} {f : α → β}
(hf : @measurable α β ma mb f) (ha : ma ≤ ma') (hb : mb' ≤ mb) :
@measurable α β ma' mb' f :=
λ t ht, ha _ $ hf $ hb _ ht
lemma measurable_from_top [measurable_space β] {f : α → β} : @measurable _ _ ⊤ _ f :=
λ s hs, trivial
lemma measurable_generate_from [measurable_space α] {s : set (set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' t)) : @measurable _ _ _ (generate_from s) f :=
measurable.of_le_map $ generate_from_le h
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
lemma measurable_id : measurable (@id α) := λ t, id
lemma measurable.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : measurable g) (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (g ∘ f) :=
λ t ht, hf (hg ht)
@[nontriviality] lemma subsingleton.measurable [subsingleton α] {f : α → β} : measurable f :=
λ s hs, @subsingleton.measurable_set α _ _ _
lemma measurable.piecewise {s : set α} {_ : decidable_pred s} {f g : α → β}
(hs : measurable_set s) (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (piecewise s f g) :=
begin
intros t ht,
simp only [piecewise_preimage],
exact (hs.inter $ hf ht).union (hs.compl.inter $ hg ht)
end
/-- this is slightly different from `measurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`measurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact measurable.ite (measurable_set_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const`,
but replacing `measurable.ite` by `measurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
lemma measurable.ite {p : α → Prop} {_ : decidable_pred p} {f g : α → β}
(hp : measurable_set {a : α | p a}) (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ x, ite (p x) (f x) (g x)) :=
measurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[simp] lemma measurable_const {a : α} : measurable (λ b : β, a) :=
assume s hs, measurable_set.const (a ∈ s)
lemma measurable.indicator [has_zero β] {s : set α} {f : α → β}
(hf : measurable f) (hs : measurable_set s) : measurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs measurable_const
@[to_additive]
lemma measurable_one [has_one α] : measurable (1 : β → α) := @measurable_const _ _ _ _ 1
lemma measurable_of_not_nonempty (h : ¬ nonempty α) (f : α → β) : measurable f :=
begin
assume s hs,
convert measurable_set.empty,
exact eq_empty_of_not_nonempty h _,
end
end measurable_functions
section constructions
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
instance : measurable_space empty := ⊤
instance : measurable_space punit := ⊤ -- this also works for `unit`
instance : measurable_space bool := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℕ := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℤ := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℚ := ⊤
lemma measurable_to_encodable [encodable α] {f : β → α} (h : ∀ y, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' {f y})) :
measurable f :=
begin
assume s hs,
rw [← bUnion_preimage_singleton],
refine measurable_set.Union (λ y, measurable_set.Union_Prop $ λ hy, _),
by_cases hyf : y ∈ range f,
{ rcases hyf with ⟨y, rfl⟩,
apply h },
{ simp only [preimage_singleton_eq_empty.2 hyf, measurable_set.empty] }
end
lemma measurable_unit (f : unit → α) : measurable f :=
measurable_from_top
section nat
lemma measurable_from_nat {f : ℕ → α} : measurable f :=
measurable_from_top
lemma measurable_to_nat {f : α → ℕ} : (∀ y, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' {f y})) → measurable f :=
measurable_to_encodable
lemma measurable_find_greatest' {p : α → ℕ → Prop}
{N} (hN : ∀ k ≤ N, measurable_set {x | nat.find_greatest (p x) N = k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find_greatest (p x) N) :=
measurable_to_nat $ λ x, hN _ nat.find_greatest_le
lemma measurable_find_greatest {p : α → ℕ → Prop} {N} (hN : ∀ k ≤ N, measurable_set {x | p x k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find_greatest (p x) N) :=
begin
refine measurable_find_greatest' (λ k hk, _),
simp only [nat.find_greatest_eq_iff, set_of_and, set_of_forall, ← compl_set_of],
repeat { apply_rules [measurable_set.inter, measurable_set.const, measurable_set.Inter,
measurable_set.Inter_Prop, measurable_set.compl, hN]; try { intros } }
end
lemma measurable_find {p : α → ℕ → Prop} (hp : ∀ x, ∃ N, p x N)
(hm : ∀ k, measurable_set {x | p x k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find (hp x)) :=
begin
refine measurable_to_nat (λ x, _),
simp only [set.preimage, mem_singleton_iff, nat.find_eq_iff, set_of_and, set_of_forall,
← compl_set_of],
repeat { apply_rules [measurable_set.inter, hm, measurable_set.Inter, measurable_set.Inter_Prop,
measurable_set.compl]; try { intros } }
end
end nat
section subtype
instance {α} {p : α → Prop} [m : measurable_space α] : measurable_space (subtype p) :=
m.comap (coe : _ → α)
lemma measurable_subtype_coe {p : α → Prop} : measurable (coe : subtype p → α) :=
measurable_space.le_map_comap
lemma measurable.subtype_coe {p : β → Prop} {f : α → subtype p} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a : β)) :=
measurable_subtype_coe.comp hf
lemma measurable.subtype_mk {p : β → Prop} {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f) {h : ∀ x, p (f x)} :
measurable (λ x, (⟨f x, h x⟩ : subtype p)) :=
λ t ⟨s, hs⟩, hs.2 ▸ by simp only [← preimage_comp, (∘), subtype.coe_mk, hf hs.1]
lemma measurable_set.subtype_image {s : set α} {t : set s}
(hs : measurable_set s) : measurable_set t → measurable_set ((coe : s → α) '' t)
| ⟨u, (hu : measurable_set u), (eq : coe ⁻¹' u = t)⟩ :=
begin
rw [← eq, subtype.image_preimage_coe],
exact hu.inter hs
end
lemma measurable_of_measurable_union_cover
{f : α → β} (s t : set α) (hs : measurable_set s) (ht : measurable_set t) (h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t)
(hc : measurable (λ a : s, f a)) (hd : measurable (λ a : t, f a)) :
measurable f :=
begin
intros u hu,
convert (hs.subtype_image (hc hu)).union (ht.subtype_image (hd hu)),
change f ⁻¹' u = coe '' (coe ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' u) : set s) ∪ coe '' (coe ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' u) : set t),
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, subtype.range_coe,
subtype.range_coe, ← inter_distrib_left, univ_subset_iff.1 h, inter_univ],
end
lemma measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton [measurable_singleton_class α]
{f : α → β} (a : α) (hf : measurable (set.restrict f {x | x ≠ a})) :
measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_union_cover _ _ measurable_set_eq measurable_set_eq.compl
(λ x hx, classical.em _)
(@subsingleton.measurable {x | x = a} _ _ _ ⟨λ x y, subtype.eq $ x.2.trans y.2.symm⟩ _) hf
end subtype
section prod
instance {α β} [m₁ : measurable_space α] [m₂ : measurable_space β] : measurable_space (α × β) :=
m₁.comap prod.fst ⊔ m₂.comap prod.snd
lemma measurable_fst : measurable (prod.fst : α × β → α) :=
measurable.of_comap_le le_sup_left
lemma measurable.fst {f : α → β × γ} (hf : measurable f) : measurable (λ a : α, (f a).1) :=
measurable_fst.comp hf
lemma measurable_snd : measurable (prod.snd : α × β → β) :=
measurable.of_comap_le le_sup_right
lemma measurable.snd {f : α → β × γ} (hf : measurable f) : measurable (λ a : α, (f a).2) :=
measurable_snd.comp hf
lemma measurable.prod {f : α → β × γ}
(hf₁ : measurable (λ a, (f a).1)) (hf₂ : measurable (λ a, (f a).2)) : measurable f :=
measurable.of_le_map $ sup_le
(by { rw [measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map, measurable_space.map_comp], exact hf₁ })
(by { rw [measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map, measurable_space.map_comp], exact hf₂ })
lemma measurable_prod {f : α → β × γ} : measurable f ↔
measurable (λ a, (f a).1) ∧ measurable (λ a, (f a).2) :=
⟨λ hf, ⟨measurable_fst.comp hf, measurable_snd.comp hf⟩, λ h, measurable.prod h.1 h.2⟩
lemma measurable.prod_mk {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a, g a)) :=
measurable.prod hf hg
lemma measurable_prod_mk_left {x : α} : measurable (@prod.mk _ β x) :=
measurable_const.prod_mk measurable_id
lemma measurable_prod_mk_right {y : β} : measurable (λ x : α, (x, y)) :=
measurable_id.prod_mk measurable_const
lemma measurable.of_uncurry_left {f : α → β → γ} (hf : measurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} :
measurable (f x) :=
hf.comp measurable_prod_mk_left
lemma measurable.of_uncurry_right {f : α → β → γ} (hf : measurable (uncurry f)) {y : β} :
measurable (λ x, f x y) :=
hf.comp measurable_prod_mk_right
lemma measurable_swap : measurable (prod.swap : α × β → β × α) :=
measurable.prod measurable_snd measurable_fst
lemma measurable_swap_iff {f : α × β → γ} : measurable (f ∘ prod.swap) ↔ measurable f :=
⟨λ hf, by { convert hf.comp measurable_swap, ext ⟨x, y⟩, refl }, λ hf, hf.comp measurable_swap⟩
lemma measurable_set.prod {s : set α} {t : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) (ht : measurable_set t) :
measurable_set (s.prod t) :=
measurable_set.inter (measurable_fst hs) (measurable_snd ht)
lemma measurable_set_prod_of_nonempty {s : set α} {t : set β} (h : (s.prod t).nonempty) :
measurable_set (s.prod t) ↔ measurable_set s ∧ measurable_set t :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hx, hy⟩,
refine ⟨λ hst, _, λ h, h.1.prod h.2⟩,
have : measurable_set ((λ x, (x, y)) ⁻¹' s.prod t) := measurable_id.prod_mk measurable_const hst,
have : measurable_set (prod.mk x ⁻¹' s.prod t) := measurable_const.prod_mk measurable_id hst,
simp * at *
end
lemma measurable_set_prod {s : set α} {t : set β} :
measurable_set (s.prod t) ↔ (measurable_set s ∧ measurable_set t) ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
begin
cases (s.prod t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h] },
{ simp [←not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, prod_nonempty_iff.mp h, measurable_set_prod_of_nonempty h] }
end
lemma measurable_set_swap_iff {s : set (α × β)} :
measurable_set (prod.swap ⁻¹' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨λ hs, by { convert measurable_swap hs, ext ⟨x, y⟩, refl }, λ hs, measurable_swap hs⟩
end prod
section pi
variables {π : δ → Type*}
instance measurable_space.pi [m : Π a, measurable_space (π a)] : measurable_space (Π a, π a) :=
⨆ a, (m a).comap (λ b, b a)
variables [Π a, measurable_space (π a)] [measurable_space γ]
lemma measurable_pi_iff {g : α → Π a, π a} :
measurable g ↔ ∀ a, measurable (λ x, g x a) :=
by simp_rw [measurable_iff_comap_le, measurable_space.pi, measurable_space.comap_supr,
measurable_space.comap_comp, function.comp, supr_le_iff]
lemma measurable_pi_apply (a : δ) : measurable (λ f : Π a, π a, f a) :=
measurable.of_comap_le $ le_supr _ a
lemma measurable.eval {a : δ} {g : α → Π a, π a}
(hg : measurable g) : measurable (λ x, g x a) :=
(measurable_pi_apply a).comp hg
lemma measurable_pi_lambda (f : α → Π a, π a) (hf : ∀ a, measurable (λ c, f c a)) :
measurable f :=
measurable_pi_iff.mpr hf
/-- The function `update f a : π a → Π a, π a` is always measurable.
This doesn't require `f` to be measurable.
This should not be confused with the statement that `update f a x` is measurable. -/
lemma measurable_update (f : Π (a : δ), π a) {a : δ} : measurable (update f a) :=
begin
apply measurable_pi_lambda,
intro x, by_cases hx : x = a,
{ cases hx, convert measurable_id, ext, simp },
simp_rw [update_noteq hx], apply measurable_const,
end
/- Even though we cannot use projection notation, we still keep a dot to be consistent with similar
lemmas, like `measurable_set.prod`. -/
lemma measurable_set.pi {s : set δ} {t : Π i : δ, set (π i)} (hs : countable s)
(ht : ∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i)) :
measurable_set (s.pi t) :=
by { rw [pi_def], exact measurable_set.bInter hs (λ i hi, measurable_pi_apply _ (ht i hi)) }
lemma measurable_set.univ_pi [encodable δ] {t : Π i : δ, set (π i)}
(ht : ∀ i, measurable_set (t i)) : measurable_set (pi univ t) :=
measurable_set.pi (countable_encodable _) (λ i _, ht i)
lemma measurable_set_pi_of_nonempty {s : set δ} {t : Π i, set (π i)} (hs : countable s)
(h : (pi s t).nonempty) : measurable_set (pi s t) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨f, hf⟩, refine ⟨λ hst i hi, _, measurable_set.pi hs⟩,
convert measurable_update f hst, rw [update_preimage_pi hi], exact λ j hj _, hf j hj
end
lemma measurable_set_pi {s : set δ} {t : Π i, set (π i)} (hs : countable s) :
measurable_set (pi s t) ↔ (∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i)) ∨ pi s t = ∅ :=
begin
cases (pi s t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h] },
{ simp [measurable_set_pi_of_nonempty hs, h, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] }
end
section fintype
local attribute [instance] fintype.encodable
lemma measurable_set.pi_fintype [fintype δ] {s : set δ} {t : Π i, set (π i)}
(ht : ∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i)) : measurable_set (pi s t) :=
measurable_set.pi (countable_encodable _) ht
lemma measurable_set.univ_pi_fintype [fintype δ] {t : Π i, set (π i)}
(ht : ∀ i, measurable_set (t i)) : measurable_set (pi univ t) :=
measurable_set.pi_fintype (λ i _, ht i)
end fintype
end pi
instance tprod.measurable_space (π : δ → Type*) [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)] :
∀ (l : list δ), measurable_space (list.tprod π l)
| [] := punit.measurable_space
| (i :: is) := @prod.measurable_space _ _ _ (tprod.measurable_space is)
section tprod
open list
variables {π : δ → Type*} [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)]
lemma measurable_tprod_mk (l : list δ) : measurable (@tprod.mk δ π l) :=
begin
induction l with i l ih,
{ exact measurable_const },
{ exact (measurable_pi_apply i).prod_mk ih }
end
lemma measurable_tprod_elim : ∀ {l : list δ} {i : δ} (hi : i ∈ l),
measurable (λ (v : tprod π l), v.elim hi)
| (i :: is) j hj := begin
by_cases hji : j = i,
{ subst hji, simp [measurable_fst] },
{ rw [funext $ tprod.elim_of_ne _ hji],
exact (measurable_tprod_elim (hj.resolve_left hji)).comp measurable_snd }
end
lemma measurable_tprod_elim' {l : list δ} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ l) :
measurable (tprod.elim' h : tprod π l → Π i, π i) :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, measurable_tprod_elim (h i))
lemma measurable_set.tprod (l : list δ) {s : ∀ i, set (π i)} (hs : ∀ i, measurable_set (s i)) :
measurable_set (set.tprod l s) :=
by { induction l with i l ih, exact measurable_set.univ, exact (hs i).prod ih }
end tprod
instance {α β} [m₁ : measurable_space α] [m₂ : measurable_space β] : measurable_space (α ⊕ β) :=
m₁.map sum.inl ⊓ m₂.map sum.inr
section sum
lemma measurable_inl : measurable (@sum.inl α β) := measurable.of_le_map inf_le_left
lemma measurable_inr : measurable (@sum.inr α β) := measurable.of_le_map inf_le_right
lemma measurable_sum {f : α ⊕ β → γ}
(hl : measurable (f ∘ sum.inl)) (hr : measurable (f ∘ sum.inr)) : measurable f :=
measurable.of_comap_le $ le_inf
(measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ hl)
(measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ hr)
lemma measurable.sum_elim {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (sum.elim f g) :=
measurable_sum hf hg
lemma measurable_set.inl_image {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable_set (sum.inl '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
⟨show measurable_set (sum.inl ⁻¹' _), by { rwa [preimage_image_eq], exact (λ a b, sum.inl.inj) },
have sum.inr ⁻¹' (sum.inl '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨y, hy, eq⟩, by contradiction,
show measurable_set (sum.inr ⁻¹' _), by { rw [this], exact measurable_set.empty }⟩
lemma measurable_set_range_inl : measurable_set (range sum.inl : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
by { rw [← image_univ], exact measurable_set.univ.inl_image }
lemma measurable_set_inr_image {s : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable_set (sum.inr '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
⟨ have sum.inl ⁻¹' (sum.inr '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨y, hy, eq⟩, by contradiction,
show measurable_set (sum.inl ⁻¹' _), by { rw [this], exact measurable_set.empty },
show measurable_set (sum.inr ⁻¹' _), by { rwa [preimage_image_eq], exact λ a b, sum.inr.inj }⟩
lemma measurable_set_range_inr : measurable_set (range sum.inr : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
by { rw [← image_univ], exact measurable_set_inr_image measurable_set.univ }
end sum
instance {α} {β : α → Type*} [m : Πa, measurable_space (β a)] : measurable_space (sigma β) :=
⨅a, (m a).map (sigma.mk a)
end constructions
/-- Equivalences between measurable spaces. Main application is the simplification of measurability
statements along measurable equivalences. -/
structure measurable_equiv (α β : Type*) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] extends α ≃ β :=
(measurable_to_fun : measurable to_fun)
(measurable_inv_fun : measurable inv_fun)
infix ` ≃ᵐ `:25 := measurable_equiv
namespace measurable_equiv
variables (α β) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] [measurable_space δ]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (α ≃ᵐ β) :=
⟨λ _, α → β, λ e, e.to_equiv⟩
variables {α β}
lemma coe_eq (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : (e : α → β) = e.to_equiv := rfl
protected lemma measurable (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : measurable (e : α → β) :=
e.measurable_to_fun
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h1 : measurable e) (h2 : measurable e.symm) :
((⟨e, h1, h2⟩ : α ≃ᵐ β) : α → β) = e := rfl
/-- Any measurable space is equivalent to itself. -/
def refl (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : α ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.refl α,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id, measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id }
instance : inhabited (α ≃ᵐ α) := ⟨refl α⟩
/-- The composition of equivalences between measurable spaces. -/
@[simps] def trans (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (bc : β ≃ᵐ γ) :
α ≃ᵐ γ :=
{ to_equiv := ab.to_equiv.trans bc.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun := bc.measurable_to_fun.comp ab.measurable_to_fun,
measurable_inv_fun := ab.measurable_inv_fun.comp bc.measurable_inv_fun }
/-- The inverse of an equivalence between measurable spaces. -/
@[simps] def symm (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) : β ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := ab.to_equiv.symm,
measurable_to_fun := ab.measurable_inv_fun,
measurable_inv_fun := ab.measurable_to_fun }
@[simp] lemma coe_symm_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h1 : measurable e) (h2 : measurable e.symm) :
((⟨e, h1, h2⟩ : α ≃ᵐ β).symm : β → α) = e.symm := rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_comp_self (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e.symm ∘ e = id := funext e.left_inv
@[simp] theorem self_comp_symm (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e ∘ e.symm = id := funext e.right_inv
/-- Equal measurable spaces are equivalent. -/
protected def cast {α β} [i₁ : measurable_space α] [i₂ : measurable_space β]
(h : α = β) (hi : i₁ == i₂) : α ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.cast h,
measurable_to_fun := by { substI h, substI hi, exact measurable_id },
measurable_inv_fun := by { substI h, substI hi, exact measurable_id }}
protected lemma measurable_coe_iff {f : β → γ} (e : α ≃ᵐ β) :
measurable (f ∘ e) ↔ measurable f :=
iff.intro
(assume hfe,
have measurable (f ∘ (e.symm.trans e).to_equiv) := hfe.comp e.symm.measurable,
by rwa [trans_to_equiv, symm_to_equiv, equiv.symm_trans] at this)
(λ h, h.comp e.measurable)
/-- Products of equivalent measurable spaces are equivalent. -/
def prod_congr (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (cd : γ ≃ᵐ δ) : α × γ ≃ᵐ β × δ :=
{ to_equiv := prod_congr ab.to_equiv cd.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun := (ab.measurable_to_fun.comp measurable_id.fst).prod_mk
(cd.measurable_to_fun.comp measurable_id.snd),
measurable_inv_fun := (ab.measurable_inv_fun.comp measurable_id.fst).prod_mk
(cd.measurable_inv_fun.comp measurable_id.snd) }
/-- Products of measurable spaces are symmetric. -/
def prod_comm : α × β ≃ᵐ β × α :=
{ to_equiv := prod_comm α β,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.snd.prod_mk measurable_id.fst,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id.snd.prod_mk measurable_id.fst }
/-- Products of measurable spaces are associative. -/
def prod_assoc : (α × β) × γ ≃ᵐ α × (β × γ) :=
{ to_equiv := prod_assoc α β γ,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_fst.fst.prod_mk $ measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd,
measurable_inv_fun := (measurable_fst.prod_mk measurable_snd.fst).prod_mk measurable_snd.snd }
/-- Sums of measurable spaces are symmetric. -/
def sum_congr (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (cd : γ ≃ᵐ δ) : α ⊕ γ ≃ᵐ β ⊕ δ :=
{ to_equiv := sum_congr ab.to_equiv cd.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun :=
begin
cases ab with ab' abm, cases ab', cases cd with cd' cdm, cases cd',
refine measurable_sum (measurable_inl.comp abm) (measurable_inr.comp cdm)
end,
measurable_inv_fun :=
begin
cases ab with ab' _ abm, cases ab', cases cd with cd' _ cdm, cases cd',
refine measurable_sum (measurable_inl.comp abm) (measurable_inr.comp cdm)
end }
/-- `set.prod s t ≃ (s × t)` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.prod (s : set α) (t : set β) : s.prod t ≃ᵐ s × t :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.prod s t,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.subtype_coe.fst.subtype_mk.prod_mk
measurable_id.subtype_coe.snd.subtype_mk,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk $ measurable_id.fst.subtype_coe.prod_mk
measurable_id.snd.subtype_coe }
/-- `univ α ≃ α` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.univ (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : (univ : set α) ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.univ α,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.subtype_coe,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id.subtype_mk }
/-- `{a} ≃ unit` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.singleton (a : α) : ({a} : set α) ≃ᵐ unit :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.singleton a,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_const,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_const }
/-- A set is equivalent to its image under a function `f` as measurable spaces,
if `f` is an injective measurable function that sends measurable sets to measurable sets. -/
noncomputable def set.image (f : α → β) (s : set α) (hf : injective f)
(hfm : measurable f) (hfi : ∀ s, measurable_set s → measurable_set (f '' s)) : s ≃ᵐ (f '' s) :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.image f s hf,
measurable_to_fun := (hfm.comp measurable_id.subtype_coe).subtype_mk,
measurable_inv_fun :=
begin
rintro t ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩, simp [preimage_preimage, set.image_symm_preimage hf],
exact measurable_subtype_coe (hfi u hu)
end }
/-- The domain of `f` is equivalent to its range as measurable spaces,
if `f` is an injective measurable function that sends measurable sets to measurable sets. -/
noncomputable def set.range (f : α → β) (hf : injective f) (hfm : measurable f)
(hfi : ∀ s, measurable_set s → measurable_set (f '' s)) :
α ≃ᵐ (range f) :=
(measurable_equiv.set.univ _).symm.trans $
(measurable_equiv.set.image f univ hf hfm hfi).trans $
measurable_equiv.cast (by rw image_univ) (by rw image_univ)
/-- `α` is equivalent to its image in `α ⊕ β` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.range_inl : (range sum.inl : set (α ⊕ β)) ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, match ab with
| ⟨sum.inl a, _⟩ := a
| ⟨sum.inr b, p⟩ := have false, by { cases p, contradiction }, this.elim
end,
inv_fun := λ a, ⟨sum.inl a, a, rfl⟩,
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨ab, a, rfl⟩, refl },
right_inv := assume a, rfl,
measurable_to_fun := assume s (hs : measurable_set s),
begin
refine ⟨_, hs.inl_image, set.ext _⟩,
rintros ⟨ab, a, rfl⟩,
simp [set.range_inl._match_1]
end,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk measurable_inl }
/-- `β` is equivalent to its image in `α ⊕ β` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.range_inr : (range sum.inr : set (α ⊕ β)) ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, match ab with
| ⟨sum.inr b, _⟩ := b
| ⟨sum.inl a, p⟩ := have false, by { cases p, contradiction }, this.elim
end,
inv_fun := λ b, ⟨sum.inr b, b, rfl⟩,
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨ab, b, rfl⟩, refl },
right_inv := assume b, rfl,
measurable_to_fun := assume s (hs : measurable_set s),
begin
refine ⟨_, measurable_set_inr_image hs, set.ext _⟩,
rintros ⟨ab, b, rfl⟩,
simp [set.range_inr._match_1]
end,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk measurable_inr }
/-- Products distribute over sums (on the right) as measurable spaces. -/
def sum_prod_distrib (α β γ) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] :
(α ⊕ β) × γ ≃ᵐ (α × γ) ⊕ (β × γ) :=
{ to_equiv := sum_prod_distrib α β γ,
measurable_to_fun :=
begin
refine measurable_of_measurable_union_cover
((range sum.inl).prod univ)
((range sum.inr).prod univ)
(measurable_set_range_inl.prod measurable_set.univ)
(measurable_set_range_inr.prod measurable_set.univ)
(by { rintro ⟨a|b, c⟩; simp [set.prod_eq] })
_
_,
{ refine (set.prod (range sum.inl) univ).symm.measurable_coe_iff.1 _,
refine (prod_congr set.range_inl (set.univ _)).symm.measurable_coe_iff.1 _,
dsimp [(∘)],
convert measurable_inl,
ext ⟨a, c⟩, refl },
{ refine (set.prod (range sum.inr) univ).symm.measurable_coe_iff.1 _,
refine (prod_congr set.range_inr (set.univ _)).symm.measurable_coe_iff.1 _,
dsimp [(∘)],
convert measurable_inr,
ext ⟨b, c⟩, refl }
end,
measurable_inv_fun :=
measurable_sum
((measurable_inl.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_snd)
((measurable_inr.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_snd) }
/-- Products distribute over sums (on the left) as measurable spaces. -/
def prod_sum_distrib (α β γ) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] :
α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ᵐ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ) :=
prod_comm.trans $ (sum_prod_distrib _ _ _).trans $ sum_congr prod_comm prod_comm
/-- Products distribute over sums as measurable spaces. -/
def sum_prod_sum (α β γ δ)
[measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] [measurable_space δ] :
(α ⊕ β) × (γ ⊕ δ) ≃ᵐ ((α × γ) ⊕ (α × δ)) ⊕ ((β × γ) ⊕ (β × δ)) :=
(sum_prod_distrib _ _ _).trans $ sum_congr (prod_sum_distrib _ _ _) (prod_sum_distrib _ _ _)
variables {π π' : δ' → Type*} [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)] [∀ x, measurable_space (π' x)]
/-- A family of measurable equivalences `Π a, β₁ a ≃ᵐ β₂ a` generates a measurable equivalence
between `Π a, β₁ a` and `Π a, β₂ a`. -/
def Pi_congr_right (e : Π a, π a ≃ᵐ π' a) : (Π a, π a) ≃ᵐ (Π a, π' a) :=
{ to_equiv := Pi_congr_right (λ a, (e a).to_equiv),
measurable_to_fun :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, (e i).measurable_to_fun.comp (measurable_pi_apply i)),
measurable_inv_fun :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, (e i).measurable_inv_fun.comp (measurable_pi_apply i)) }
/-- Pi-types are measurably equivalent to iterated products. -/
noncomputable def pi_measurable_equiv_tprod {l : list δ'} (hnd : l.nodup) (h : ∀ i, i ∈ l) :
(Π i, π i) ≃ᵐ list.tprod π l :=
{ to_equiv := list.tprod.pi_equiv_tprod hnd h,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_tprod_mk l,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_tprod_elim' h }
end measurable_equiv
namespace filter
variables [measurable_space α]
/-- A filter `f` is measurably generates if each `s ∈ f` includes a measurable `t ∈ f`. -/
class is_measurably_generated (f : filter α) : Prop :=
(exists_measurable_subset : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∃ t ∈ f, measurable_set t ∧ t ⊆ s)
instance is_measurably_generated_bot : is_measurably_generated (⊥ : filter α) :=
⟨λ _ _, ⟨∅, mem_bot_sets, measurable_set.empty, empty_subset _⟩⟩
instance is_measurably_generated_top : is_measurably_generated (⊤ : filter α) :=
⟨λ s hs, ⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, measurable_set.univ, λ x _, hs x⟩⟩
lemma eventually.exists_measurable_mem {f : filter α} [is_measurably_generated f]
{p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ s ∈ f, measurable_set s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset h
lemma eventually.exists_measurable_mem_of_lift' {f : filter α} [is_measurably_generated f]
{p : set α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ s in f.lift' powerset, p s) :
∃ s ∈ f, measurable_set s ∧ p s :=
let ⟨s, hsf, hs⟩ := eventually_lift'_powerset.1 h,
⟨t, htf, htm, hts⟩ := is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsf
in ⟨t, htf, htm, hs t hts⟩
instance inf_is_measurably_generated (f g : filter α) [is_measurably_generated f]
[is_measurably_generated g] :
is_measurably_generated (f ⊓ g) :=
begin
refine ⟨_⟩,
rintros t ⟨sf, hsf, sg, hsg, ht⟩,
rcases is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsf with ⟨s'f, hs'f, hmf, hs'sf⟩,
rcases is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsg with ⟨s'g, hs'g, hmg, hs'sg⟩,
refine ⟨s'f ∩ s'g, inter_mem_inf_sets hs'f hs'g, hmf.inter hmg, _⟩,
exact subset.trans (inter_subset_inter hs'sf hs'sg) ht
end
lemma principal_is_measurably_generated_iff {s : set α} :
is_measurably_generated (𝓟 s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ hs, ⟨λ t ht, ⟨s, mem_principal_self s, hs, ht⟩⟩⟩,
rintros ⟨hs⟩,
rcases hs (mem_principal_self s) with ⟨t, ht, htm, hts⟩,
have : t = s := subset.antisymm hts ht,
rwa ← this
end
alias principal_is_measurably_generated_iff ↔
_ measurable_set.principal_is_measurably_generated
instance infi_is_measurably_generated {f : ι → filter α} [∀ i, is_measurably_generated (f i)] :
is_measurably_generated (⨅ i, f i) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ s hs, _⟩,
rw [← equiv.plift.surjective.infi_comp, mem_infi_iff] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨t, ht, ⟨V, hVf, hVs⟩⟩,
choose U hUf hU using λ i, is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset (hVf i),
refine ⟨⋂ i : t, U i, _, _, _⟩,
{ rw [← equiv.plift.surjective.infi_comp, mem_infi_iff],
refine ⟨t, ht, U, hUf, subset.refl _⟩ },
{ haveI := ht.countable.to_encodable,
refine measurable_set.Inter (λ i, (hU i).1) },
{ exact subset.trans (Inter_subset_Inter $ λ i, (hU i).2) hVs }
end
end filter
/-- We say that a collection of sets is countably spanning if a countable subset spans the
whole type. This is a useful condition in various parts of measure theory. For example, it is
a needed condition to show that the product of two collections generate the product sigma algebra,
see `generate_from_prod_eq`. -/
def is_countably_spanning (C : set (set α)) : Prop :=
∃ (s : ℕ → set α), (∀ n, s n ∈ C) ∧ (⋃ n, s n) = univ
lemma is_countably_spanning_measurable_set [measurable_space α] :
is_countably_spanning {s : set α | measurable_set s} :=
⟨λ _, univ, λ _, measurable_set.univ, Union_const _⟩
|
e6bf2694c2a81b1ad5928f539ba007a5fad6586b | 01eb4c74ed0144826962c915fd513c4d3db7f1ca | /sledgehammer.lean | a14e05784057ea5f11fd28b7928feba4ca24e835 | [] | no_license | johoelzl/lean-sh | a8fff00774a7f1c7a587182bdcc57bf22a0f3839 | 01ce37c2a7b897e02e0d75b1db3b5fee779ae880 | refs/heads/master | 1,629,381,989,595 | 1,511,708,563,000 | 1,511,708,563,000 | 112,092,141 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,383 | lean | open tactic expr declaration
meta def get_declarations : tactic $ list declaration :=
(λe : environment, e.fold [] (λd xs, d :: xs)) <$> get_env
inductive fo_term : Type
| var : name → fo_term
| func : name → list fo_term → fo_term
def fo_term.func₀ (n : name) : fo_term := fo_term.func n []
def fo_term.func₁ (n : name) (a : fo_term) : fo_term := fo_term.func n [a]
def fo_term.func₂ (n : name) (a₁ a₂ : fo_term) : fo_term := fo_term.func n [a₁, a₂]
instance : inhabited fo_term := ⟨fo_term.var $ default name⟩
meta def fo_term.to_format : fo_term → format
| (fo_term.var nm) := to_fmt nm
| (fo_term.func nm lst) :=
to_fmt nm ++ format.paren (format.join (lst.map $ λl, l.to_format ++ format.space))
meta instance : has_to_format fo_term := ⟨fo_term.to_format⟩
inductive fo_logic : Type
| all : name → fo_logic → fo_logic
| ex : name → fo_logic → fo_logic
| pred : name → list fo_term → fo_logic
| eq : fo_term → fo_term → fo_logic
| conn : name → list fo_logic → fo_logic
def fo_logic.conn₀ (n : name) : fo_logic := fo_logic.conn n []
def fo_logic.conn₁ (n : name) (a : fo_logic) : fo_logic := fo_logic.conn n [a]
def fo_logic.conn₂ (n : name) (a₁ a₂ : fo_logic) : fo_logic := fo_logic.conn n [a₁, a₂]
def fo_logic.imp : fo_logic → fo_logic → fo_logic := fo_logic.conn₂ `imp
def fo_logic.and : fo_logic → fo_logic → fo_logic := fo_logic.conn₂ `and
def fo_logic.or : fo_logic → fo_logic → fo_logic := fo_logic.conn₂ `or
def fo_logic.iff : fo_logic → fo_logic → fo_logic := fo_logic.conn₂ `iff
def fo_logic.neg : fo_logic → fo_logic := fo_logic.conn₁ `neg
def fo_logic.true : fo_logic := fo_logic.conn₀ `true
def fo_logic.false : fo_logic := fo_logic.conn₀ `false
def fo_logic.pred₀ (n : name) : fo_logic := fo_logic.pred n []
def fo_logic.pred₁ (n : name) (a : fo_term) : fo_logic := fo_logic.pred n [a]
def fo_logic.pred₂ (n : name) (a₁ a₂ : fo_term) : fo_logic := fo_logic.pred n [a₁, a₂]
instance : inhabited fo_logic := ⟨fo_logic.true⟩
meta def fo_logic.to_format : fo_logic → format
| (fo_logic.all nm l) := to_fmt "∀" ++ to_fmt nm ++ to_fmt ", " ++ fo_logic.to_format l
| (fo_logic.ex nm l) := to_fmt "∃" ++ to_fmt nm ++ to_fmt ", " ++ fo_logic.to_format l
| (fo_logic.pred nm lst) := to_fmt nm ++ to_fmt lst
| (fo_logic.eq a b) := to_fmt a ++ to_fmt " = " ++ to_fmt b
| (fo_logic.conn nm lst) := to_fmt nm ++ format.space ++
format.paren (format.join $ lst.map $ λl, l.to_format ++ format.space)
meta instance : has_to_format fo_logic := ⟨fo_logic.to_format⟩
meta structure cic_to_fo_data : Type :=
(ctxt : list $ name × expr × fo_term)
(declarations : list $ name × fo_logic)
meta instance : inhabited cic_to_fo_data := ⟨⟨[], []⟩⟩
meta def cic_to_fo := state_t cic_to_fo_data tactic
meta instance : monad cic_to_fo := state_t.monad _ _
meta instance : monad.has_monad_lift tactic cic_to_fo := ⟨λα, state_t.lift⟩
meta instance (α : Type) : has_coe (tactic α) (cic_to_fo α) := ⟨monad.monad_lift⟩
meta instance : alternative cic_to_fo := state_t.alternative _ _
meta instance : monad_fail cic_to_fo :=
{ fail := λ α s, (tactic.fail (to_fmt s) : cic_to_fo α), ..cic_to_fo.monad }
meta def get_ctxt : cic_to_fo $ list $ name × expr × fo_term :=
cic_to_fo_data.ctxt <$> state_t.read
meta def update_ctxt (ctxt : list $ name × expr × fo_term) : cic_to_fo unit :=
state_t.modify $ λd, {ctxt := ctxt .. d}
meta def with_var {α : Type} (t : name × expr × fo_term) (c : cic_to_fo α) : cic_to_fo α := do
ctxt ← get_ctxt,
update_ctxt (t :: ctxt),
a ← c,
update_ctxt ctxt,
return a
meta def add_decl (nm : name) (decl : fo_logic) : cic_to_fo unit :=
state_t.modify $ λd, { declarations := (nm, decl) :: d.declarations, .. d }
meta def get_decls : cic_to_fo $ list $ name × fo_logic :=
cic_to_fo_data.declarations <$> state_t.read
meta mutual def abstract_context, to_fo_term, to_fo_logic, to_fo_type
with abstract_context : list (name × expr × fo_term) → fo_logic → cic_to_fo fo_logic
| [] e := return e
| ((n, t, r) :: cs) e := do
t' ← to_fo_type (fo_term.var n) t,
abstract_context cs $ (t'.imp e).all n
with to_fo_term : expr → cic_to_fo fo_term
| (const n ls) := return $ fo_term.func n []
| (local_const n _ _ t) := (do
ctxt ← get_ctxt,
let n := ctxt.find_index $ λd, d.fst = n,
some (n, t, r) ← return $ ctxt.nth n,
return r) <|> (do
ctxt ← get_ctxt,
(fail ("name not found" ++ n.to_string ++ ((to_fmt ctxt).to_string)) : cic_to_fo fo_term))
| (sort l) := return $ fo_term.func `Type [] -- take care of the level
| e@(pi n _ t d) := do
ctxt ← get_ctxt,
n' ← mk_fresh_name,
let c := fo_term.func n' $ ctxt.map (fo_term.var ∘ prod.fst),
infer_type e >>= to_fo_type c >>= abstract_context ctxt >>= add_decl (n' ++ "_type"),
x ← mk_fresh_name,
let x' := fo_term.var x,
(fo_logic.all x <$> with_var (x, e, x')
((fo_logic.pred₂ `has_Type x' c).iff <$> to_fo_type x' e)) >>=
abstract_context ctxt >>= add_decl n',
return c
| e@(lam n _ t b) := do
ctxt ← get_ctxt,
n' ← mk_fresh_name,
let c := fo_term.func n' $ ctxt.map $ fo_term.var ∘ prod.fst,
infer_type e >>= to_fo_type c >>= abstract_context ctxt >>= add_decl (n' ++ "_type"),
x ← mk_fresh_name,
let x' := fo_term.var x,
let x'' := expr.local_const x n binder_info.default t,
(fo_logic.all x <$> with_var (x, t, x')
(fo_logic.eq (c.func₂ `app x') <$> to_fo_term (b.instantiate_var x''))) >>=
abstract_context ctxt >>= add_decl n',
return c
| (elet n t v b) := do
ctxt ← get_ctxt,
c ← (λn, fo_term.func n $ ctxt.map (fo_term.var ∘ prod.fst)) <$> mk_fresh_name,
to_fo_type c t >>= abstract_context ctxt >>= add_decl (n ++ "_type"),
to_fo_term v >>= λv, abstract_context ctxt (fo_logic.eq c v) >>= add_decl n,
with_var (n, t, c) $
to_fo_term (b.instantiate_var $ expr.local_const n n binder_info.default t)
| (app f a) := fo_term.func₂ `app <$> to_fo_term f <*> to_fo_term a
| (var n) := fail "unexpected bound variable"
| (mvar n pp t) := fail "meta variables not supported" -- yet?
| (macro n es) := fail "macros not handled"
with to_fo_logic : expr → cic_to_fo fo_logic
| (pi n bi t d) := do
n' ← mk_fresh_name,
let v := fo_term.var n',
let c := expr.local_const n' n bi t,
fo_logic.all n' <$> (fo_logic.imp <$> to_fo_type v t <*>
(with_var (n', t, fo_term.var n') $ to_fo_logic $ d.instantiate_var c))
| `(@Exists %%t %%d) := do
n' ← mk_fresh_name,
let v := fo_term.var n',
let c := expr.local_const n' n' binder_info.default t,
let d' := if d.is_lambda then d.binding_body.instantiate_var c else d.app c,
fo_logic.ex n' <$> (fo_logic.and <$> to_fo_type v t <*>
(with_var (n', t, fo_term.var n') $ to_fo_logic d'))
| `(true) := return fo_logic.true
| `(false) := return fo_logic.false
| `(¬ %%p) := fo_logic.neg <$> to_fo_logic p
| `(%%p ∧ %%q) := fo_logic.and <$> to_fo_logic p <*> to_fo_logic q
| `(%%p ∨ %%q) := fo_logic.or <$> to_fo_logic p <*> to_fo_logic q
| `(%%p ↔ %%q) := fo_logic.iff <$> to_fo_logic p <*> to_fo_logic q
| `(%%a = %%b) := fo_logic.eq <$> to_fo_term a <*> to_fo_term b
| `(%%a ≠ %%b) := fo_logic.neg <$> (fo_logic.eq <$> to_fo_term a <*> to_fo_term b)
| e := fo_logic.pred₁ `is_True <$> to_fo_term e
with to_fo_type : fo_term → expr → cic_to_fo fo_logic
| f (pi n bi t d) := do
n' ← mk_fresh_name,
let x := fo_term.var n',
let c := expr.local_const n n' bi t,
let f_v := f.func₂ `app x in
fo_logic.all n' <$> (fo_logic.imp <$> to_fo_type f_v t <*>
(with_var (n', t, fo_term.var n') $ to_fo_type f_v $ d.instantiate_var c))
| v e := fo_logic.pred₂ `has_Type v <$> to_fo_term e
meta def fo_term.rename_variables : list (name × name) → fo_term → tactic fo_term
| ren t@(fo_term.var nm) := (do
let n := ren.find_index $ λd, d.fst = nm,
some (_, nm') ← return $ ren.nth n,
return $ fo_term.var nm') <|> return t
| ren (fo_term.func nm ls) :=
fo_term.func nm <$> (ls.mmap $ fo_term.rename_variables ren)
meta def fo_logic.rename_variables : ℕ → list (name × name) → fo_logic → tactic fo_logic
| n ren (fo_logic.all nm l) :=
fo_logic.all (to_string n) <$> (l.rename_variables (n + 1) ((nm, to_string n) :: ren))
| n ren (fo_logic.ex nm l) :=
fo_logic.ex (to_string n) <$> (l.rename_variables (n + 1) ((nm, to_string n) :: ren))
| n ren (fo_logic.pred nm ls) :=
fo_logic.pred nm <$> (ls.mmap $ fo_term.rename_variables ren)
| n ren (fo_logic.conn nm ls) :=
fo_logic.conn nm <$> (ls.mmap $ fo_logic.rename_variables n ren)
| n ren (fo_logic.eq a b) :=
fo_logic.eq <$> (fo_term.rename_variables ren a) <*> (fo_term.rename_variables ren b)
meta def in_empty_context {α : Type} (m : cic_to_fo α) : tactic α :=
prod.fst <$> m (default cic_to_fo_data)
run_cmd do
(t, d) ← in_empty_context (do
t ← to_fo_logic `(∀α:Type, (λa:α, a) = (λa:α, a) ∧ (Πa:α, α) = (Πa:α, α)),
d ← get_decls,
return (t, d)),
d.mmap (λ⟨n, d⟩, d.rename_variables 0 [] >>= trace),
t.rename_variables 0 [] >>= trace
|
a7eb75c2596a85e00ea9e375c69d5a872ccfd1f3 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/data/nat/interval.lean | 4c78cfffd66ed334aa4f1ea98775455483e923c7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,274 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import data.finset.locally_finite
/-!
# Finite intervals of naturals
This file proves that `ℕ` is a `locally_finite_order` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
## TODO
Some lemmas can be generalized using `ordered_group`, `canonically_ordered_monoid` or `succ_order`
and subsequently be moved upstream to `data.finset.locally_finite`.
-/
open finset nat
instance : locally_finite_order ℕ :=
{ finset_Icc := λ a b, (list.range' a (b + 1 - a)).to_finset,
finset_Ico := λ a b, (list.range' a (b - a)).to_finset,
finset_Ioc := λ a b, (list.range' (a + 1) (b - a)).to_finset,
finset_Ioo := λ a b, (list.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1)).to_finset,
finset_mem_Icc := λ a b x, begin
rw [list.mem_to_finset, list.mem_range'],
cases le_or_lt a b,
{ rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le (nat.lt_succ_of_le h).le, nat.lt_succ_iff] },
{ rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (succ_le_of_lt h), add_zero],
exact iff_of_false (λ hx, hx.2.not_le hx.1) (λ hx, h.not_le (hx.1.trans hx.2)) }
end,
finset_mem_Ico := λ a b x, begin
rw [list.mem_to_finset, list.mem_range'],
cases le_or_lt a b,
{ rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le h] },
{ rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h.le, add_zero],
exact iff_of_false (λ hx, hx.2.not_le hx.1) (λ hx, h.not_le (hx.1.trans hx.2.le)) }
end,
finset_mem_Ioc := λ a b x, begin
rw [list.mem_to_finset, list.mem_range'],
cases le_or_lt a b,
{ rw [←succ_sub_succ, add_tsub_cancel_of_le (succ_le_succ h), nat.lt_succ_iff,
nat.succ_le_iff] },
{ rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h.le, add_zero],
exact iff_of_false (λ hx, hx.2.not_le hx.1) (λ hx, h.not_le (hx.1.le.trans hx.2)) }
end,
finset_mem_Ioo := λ a b x, begin
rw [list.mem_to_finset, list.mem_range', ← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub],
cases le_or_lt (a + 1) b,
{ rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le h, nat.succ_le_iff] },
{ rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h.le, add_zero],
exact iff_of_false (λ hx, hx.2.not_le hx.1) (λ hx, h.not_le (hx.1.trans hx.2)) }
end }
variables (a b c : ℕ)
namespace nat
lemma Icc_eq_range' : Icc a b = (list.range' a (b + 1 - a)).to_finset := rfl
lemma Ico_eq_range' : Ico a b = (list.range' a (b - a)).to_finset := rfl
lemma Ioc_eq_range' : Ioc a b = (list.range' (a + 1) (b - a)).to_finset := rfl
lemma Ioo_eq_range' : Ioo a b = (list.range' (a + 1) (b - a - 1)).to_finset := rfl
lemma Iio_eq_range : Iio = range := by { ext b x, rw [mem_Iio, mem_range] }
@[simp] lemma Ico_zero_eq_range : Ico 0 = range := by rw [←bot_eq_zero, ←Iio_eq_Ico, Iio_eq_range]
lemma _root_.finset.range_eq_Ico : range = Ico 0 := Ico_zero_eq_range.symm
@[simp] lemma card_Icc : (Icc a b).card = b + 1 - a :=
by rw [Icc_eq_range', list.card_to_finset, (list.nodup_range' _ _).dedup, list.length_range']
@[simp] lemma card_Ico : (Ico a b).card = b - a :=
by rw [Ico_eq_range', list.card_to_finset, (list.nodup_range' _ _).dedup, list.length_range']
@[simp] lemma card_Ioc : (Ioc a b).card = b - a :=
by rw [Ioc_eq_range', list.card_to_finset, (list.nodup_range' _ _).dedup, list.length_range']
@[simp] lemma card_Ioo : (Ioo a b).card = b - a - 1 :=
by rw [Ioo_eq_range', list.card_to_finset, (list.nodup_range' _ _).dedup, list.length_range']
@[simp] lemma card_Iic : (Iic b).card = b + 1 := by rw [Iic, card_Icc, bot_eq_zero, tsub_zero]
@[simp] lemma card_Iio : (Iio b).card = b := by rw [Iio, card_Ico, bot_eq_zero, tsub_zero]
@[simp] lemma card_fintype_Icc : fintype.card (set.Icc a b) = b + 1 - a :=
by rw [fintype.card_of_finset, card_Icc]
@[simp] lemma card_fintype_Ico : fintype.card (set.Ico a b) = b - a :=
by rw [fintype.card_of_finset, card_Ico]
@[simp] lemma card_fintype_Ioc : fintype.card (set.Ioc a b) = b - a :=
by rw [fintype.card_of_finset, card_Ioc]
@[simp] lemma card_fintype_Ioo : fintype.card (set.Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 :=
by rw [fintype.card_of_finset, card_Ioo]
@[simp] lemma card_fintype_Iic : fintype.card (set.Iic b) = b + 1 :=
by rw [fintype.card_of_finset, card_Iic]
@[simp] lemma card_fintype_Iio : fintype.card (set.Iio b) = b :=
by rw [fintype.card_of_finset, card_Iio]
-- TODO@Yaël: Generalize all the following lemmas to `succ_order`
lemma Icc_succ_left : Icc a.succ b = Ioc a b := by { ext x, rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff] }
lemma Ico_succ_right : Ico a b.succ = Icc a b := by { ext x, rw [mem_Ico, mem_Icc, lt_succ_iff] }
lemma Ico_succ_left : Ico a.succ b = Ioo a b := by { ext x, rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioo, succ_le_iff] }
lemma Icc_pred_right {b : ℕ} (h : 0 < b) : Icc a (b - 1) = Ico a b :=
by { ext x, rw [mem_Icc, mem_Ico, lt_iff_le_pred h] }
lemma Ico_succ_succ : Ico a.succ b.succ = Ioc a b :=
by { ext x, rw [mem_Ico, mem_Ioc, succ_le_iff, lt_succ_iff] }
@[simp] lemma Ico_succ_singleton : Ico a (a + 1) = {a} := by rw [Ico_succ_right, Icc_self]
@[simp] lemma Ico_pred_singleton {a : ℕ} (h : 0 < a) : Ico (a - 1) a = {a - 1} :=
by rw [←Icc_pred_right _ h, Icc_self]
@[simp] lemma Ioc_succ_singleton : Ioc b (b + 1) = {b+1} :=
by rw [← nat.Icc_succ_left, Icc_self]
variables {a b c}
lemma Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Ico a (b + 1) = insert b (Ico a b) :=
by rw [Ico_succ_right, ←Ico_insert_right h]
lemma Ico_insert_succ_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ico a.succ b) = Ico a b :=
by rw [Ico_succ_left, ←Ioo_insert_left h]
lemma image_sub_const_Ico (h : c ≤ a) : (Ico a b).image (λ x, x - c) = Ico (a - c) (b - c) :=
begin
ext x,
rw mem_image,
split,
{ rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
rw [mem_Ico] at ⊢ hx,
exact ⟨tsub_le_tsub_right hx.1 _, tsub_lt_tsub_right_of_le (h.trans hx.1) hx.2⟩ },
{ rintro h,
refine ⟨x + c, _, add_tsub_cancel_right _ _⟩,
rw mem_Ico at ⊢ h,
exact ⟨tsub_le_iff_right.1 h.1, lt_tsub_iff_right.1 h.2⟩ }
end
lemma Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico (hac : a ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).image (λ x, c - x) = Ico (c + 1 - b) (c + 1 - a) :=
begin
ext x,
rw [mem_image, mem_Ico],
split,
{ rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
rw mem_Ico at hx,
refine ⟨_, ((tsub_le_tsub_iff_left hac).2 hx.1).trans_lt ((tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right hac).2
(nat.lt_succ_self _))⟩,
cases lt_or_le c b,
{ rw tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr (succ_le_of_lt h),
exact zero_le _ },
{ rw ←succ_sub_succ c,
exact (tsub_le_tsub_iff_left (succ_le_succ $ hx.2.le.trans h)).2 hx.2 } },
{ rintro ⟨hb, ha⟩,
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left, lt_succ_iff] at ha,
have hx : x ≤ c := (nat.le_add_left _ _).trans ha,
refine ⟨c - x, _, tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le hx⟩,
{ rw mem_Ico,
exact ⟨le_tsub_of_add_le_right ha, (tsub_lt_iff_left hx).2 $ succ_le_iff.1 $
tsub_le_iff_right.1 hb⟩ } }
end
lemma Ico_succ_left_eq_erase_Ico : Ico a.succ b = erase (Ico a b) a :=
begin
ext x,
rw [Ico_succ_left, mem_erase, mem_Ico, mem_Ioo, ←and_assoc, ne_comm, and_comm (a ≠ x),
lt_iff_le_and_ne],
end
lemma mod_inj_on_Ico (n a : ℕ) : set.inj_on (% a) (finset.Ico n (n+a)) :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp only [zero_add, nat_zero_eq_zero, Ico_zero_eq_range],
rintro k hk l hl (hkl : k % a = l % a),
simp only [finset.mem_range, finset.mem_coe] at hk hl,
rwa [mod_eq_of_lt hk, mod_eq_of_lt hl] at hkl, },
rw [Ico_succ_left_eq_erase_Ico, succ_add, Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico le_self_add],
rintro k hk l hl (hkl : k % a = l % a),
have ha : 0 < a,
{ by_contra ha, simp only [not_lt, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at ha, simpa [ha] using hk },
simp only [finset.mem_coe, finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_erase] at hk hl,
rcases hk with ⟨hkn, (rfl|hk)⟩; rcases hl with ⟨hln, (rfl|hl)⟩,
{ refl },
{ rw add_mod_right at hkl,
refine (hln $ ih hl _ hkl.symm).elim,
simp only [lt_add_iff_pos_right, set.left_mem_Ico, finset.coe_Ico, ha], },
{ rw add_mod_right at hkl,
suffices : k = n, { contradiction },
refine ih hk _ hkl,
simp only [lt_add_iff_pos_right, set.left_mem_Ico, finset.coe_Ico, ha], },
{ refine ih _ _ hkl; simp only [finset.mem_coe, hk, hl], },
end
/-- Note that while this lemma cannot be easily generalized to a type class, it holds for ℤ as
well. See `int.image_Ico_mod` for the ℤ version. -/
lemma image_Ico_mod (n a : ℕ) :
(Ico n (n+a)).image (% a) = range a :=
begin
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0,
{ rw [range_zero, add_zero, Ico_self, image_empty], },
ext i,
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_range, mem_Ico],
split,
{ rintro ⟨i, h, rfl⟩, exact mod_lt i ha.bot_lt },
intro hia,
have hn := nat.mod_add_div n a,
obtain hi | hi := lt_or_le i (n % a),
{ refine ⟨i + a * (n/a + 1), ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩,
{ rw [add_comm (n/a), mul_add, mul_one, ← add_assoc],
refine hn.symm.le.trans (add_le_add_right _ _),
simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add (zero_le i) (nat.mod_lt n ha.bot_lt).le, },
{ refine lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add_right hi (a * (n/a + 1))) _,
rw [mul_add, mul_one, ← add_assoc, hn], },
{ rw [nat.add_mul_mod_self_left, nat.mod_eq_of_lt hia], } },
{ refine ⟨i + a * (n/a), ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩,
{ exact hn.symm.le.trans (add_le_add_right hi _), },
{ rw [add_comm n a],
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hia (le_trans _ hn.le),
simp only [zero_le, le_add_iff_nonneg_left], },
{ rw [nat.add_mul_mod_self_left, nat.mod_eq_of_lt hia], } },
end
section multiset
open multiset
lemma multiset_Ico_map_mod (n a : ℕ) : (multiset.Ico n (n+a)).map (% a) = range a :=
begin
convert congr_arg finset.val (image_Ico_mod n a),
refine ((nodup_map_iff_inj_on (finset.Ico _ _).nodup).2 $ _).dedup.symm,
exact mod_inj_on_Ico _ _,
end
end multiset
end nat
namespace finset
lemma range_image_pred_top_sub (n : ℕ) : (finset.range n).image (λ j, n - 1 - j) = finset.range n :=
begin
cases n,
{ rw [range_zero, image_empty] },
{ rw [finset.range_eq_Ico, nat.Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico (zero_le _)],
simp_rw [succ_sub_succ, tsub_zero, tsub_self] }
end
lemma range_add_eq_union : range (a + b) = range a ∪ (range b).map (add_left_embedding a) :=
begin
rw [finset.range_eq_Ico, map_eq_image],
convert (Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico a.zero_le le_self_add).symm,
exact image_add_left_Ico _ _ _,
end
end finset
|
392f056f7240e5191b9ebbdf7f7a75edaef91c41 | 37a833c924892ee3ecb911484775a6d6ebb8984d | /src/category_theory/products/bifunctors.lean | a8540d474ee2211966b882ea1bd3e17e80c0f105 | [] | no_license | silky/lean-category-theory | 28126e80564a1f99e9c322d86b3f7d750da0afa1 | 0f029a2364975f56ac727d31d867a18c95c22fd8 | refs/heads/master | 1,589,555,811,646 | 1,554,673,665,000 | 1,554,673,665,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,278 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
import category_theory.products
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.bifunctor
universes v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
variable {C : Type u₁}
variable [𝒞 : category.{v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂}
variable [𝒟 : category.{v₂} D]
variable {E : Type u₃}
variable [ℰ : category.{v₃} E]
include 𝒞 𝒟 ℰ
@[simp] lemma map_id (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (X : C) (Y : D) :
@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X, Y) (𝟙 X, 𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 (F.obj (X, Y)) :=
F.map_id (X, Y)
@[simp] lemma map_id_comp (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (W : C) {X Y Z : D} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (W, X) (W, Z) (𝟙 W, f ≫ g) =
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (W, X) (W, Y) (𝟙 W, f)) ≫
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (W, Y) (W, Z) (𝟙 W, g)) :=
by rw [←functor.map_comp,prod_comp,category.comp_id]
@[simp] lemma map_comp_id (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (X Y Z : C) (W : D) (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, W) (Z, W) (f ≫ g, 𝟙 W) =
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, W) (Y, W) (f, 𝟙 W)) ≫
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (Y, W) (Z, W) (g, 𝟙 W)) :=
by rw [←functor.map_comp,prod_comp,category.comp_id]
@[simp] lemma diagonal (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (X X' : C) (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Y' : D) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X, Y') (𝟙 X, g)) ≫
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y') (X', Y') (f, 𝟙 Y')) =
@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X', Y') (f, g) :=
begin
rw [←functor.map_comp, prod_comp, category.id_comp, category.comp_id],
end
@[simp] lemma diagonal' (F : (C × D) ⥤ E) (X X' : C) (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Y' : D) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X', Y) (f, 𝟙 Y)) ≫
(@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X', Y) (X', Y') (𝟙 X', g)) =
@category_theory.functor.map _ _ _ _ F (X, Y) (X', Y') (f, g) :=
begin
rw [←functor.map_comp, prod_comp, category.id_comp, category.comp_id],
end
end category_theory.bifunctor
|
d3d6c8defdf89043ca8057c62b2306a4d4bf368e | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/data/nat/count.lean | 3ec1de6d907b2d04258eb0f5df43bdf5812a1a3c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,884 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Vladimir Goryachev. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Goryachev, Kyle Miller, Scott Morrison, Eric Rodriguez
-/
import set_theory.cardinal.basic
import tactic.ring
/-!
# Counting on ℕ
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines the `count` function, which gives, for any predicate on the natural numbers,
"how many numbers under `k` satisfy this predicate?".
We then prove several expected lemmas about `count`, relating it to the cardinality of other
objects, and helping to evaluate it for specific `k`.
-/
open finset
namespace nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
section count
variable [decidable_pred p]
/-- Count the number of naturals `k < n` satisfying `p k`. -/
def count (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (list.range n).countp p
@[simp] lemma count_zero : count p 0 = 0 :=
by rw [count, list.range_zero, list.countp]
/-- A fintype instance for the set relevant to `nat.count`. Locally an instance in locale `count` -/
def count_set.fintype (n : ℕ) : fintype {i // i < n ∧ p i} :=
begin
apply fintype.of_finset ((finset.range n).filter p),
intro x,
rw [mem_filter, mem_range],
refl,
end
localized "attribute [instance] nat.count_set.fintype" in count
lemma count_eq_card_filter_range (n : ℕ) : count p n = ((range n).filter p).card :=
by { rw [count, list.countp_eq_length_filter], refl, }
/-- `count p n` can be expressed as the cardinality of `{k // k < n ∧ p k}`. -/
lemma count_eq_card_fintype (n : ℕ) : count p n = fintype.card {k : ℕ // k < n ∧ p k} :=
by { rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, ←fintype.card_of_finset, ←count_set.fintype], refl, }
lemma count_succ (n : ℕ) : count p (n + 1) = count p n + (if p n then 1 else 0) :=
by split_ifs; simp [count, list.range_succ, h]
@[mono] lemma count_monotone : monotone (count p) :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ $ λ n, by by_cases h : p n; simp [count_succ, h]
lemma count_add (a b : ℕ) : count p (a + b) = count p a + count (λ k, p (a + k)) b :=
begin
have : disjoint ((range a).filter p) (((range b).map $ add_left_embedding a).filter p),
{ apply disjoint_filter_filter,
rw finset.disjoint_left,
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, add_left_embedding_apply],
rintro x hx ⟨c, _, rfl⟩,
exact (self_le_add_right _ _).not_lt hx },
simp_rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, range_add, filter_union, card_disjoint_union this,
filter_map, add_left_embedding, card_map], refl,
end
lemma count_add' (a b : ℕ) : count p (a + b) = count (λ k, p (k + b)) a + count p b :=
by { rw [add_comm, count_add, add_comm], simp_rw [add_comm b] }
lemma count_one : count p 1 = if p 0 then 1 else 0 := by simp [count_succ]
lemma count_succ' (n : ℕ) : count p (n + 1) = count (λ k, p (k + 1)) n + if p 0 then 1 else 0 :=
by rw [count_add', count_one]
variables {p}
@[simp] lemma count_lt_count_succ_iff {n : ℕ} : count p n < count p (n + 1) ↔ p n :=
by by_cases h : p n; simp [count_succ, h]
lemma count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff {n : ℕ} : count p (n + 1) = count p n + 1 ↔ p n :=
by by_cases h : p n; simp [h, count_succ]
lemma count_succ_eq_count_iff {n : ℕ} : count p (n + 1) = count p n ↔ ¬p n :=
by by_cases h : p n; simp [h, count_succ]
alias count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff ↔ _ count_succ_eq_succ_count
alias count_succ_eq_count_iff ↔ _ count_succ_eq_count
lemma count_le_cardinal (n : ℕ) : (count p n : cardinal) ≤ cardinal.mk {k | p k} :=
begin
rw [count_eq_card_fintype, ← cardinal.mk_fintype],
exact cardinal.mk_subtype_mono (λ x hx, hx.2),
end
lemma lt_of_count_lt_count {a b : ℕ} (h : count p a < count p b) : a < b :=
(count_monotone p).reflect_lt h
lemma count_strict_mono {m n : ℕ} (hm : p m) (hmn : m < n) : count p m < count p n :=
(count_lt_count_succ_iff.2 hm).trans_le $ count_monotone _ (nat.succ_le_iff.2 hmn)
lemma count_injective {m n : ℕ} (hm : p m) (hn : p n) (heq : count p m = count p n) : m = n :=
begin
by_contra' h : m ≠ n,
wlog hmn : m < n,
{ exact this hn hm heq.symm h.symm (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left hmn) },
{ simpa [heq] using count_strict_mono hm hmn }
end
lemma count_le_card (hp : (set_of p).finite) (n : ℕ) : count p n ≤ hp.to_finset.card :=
begin
rw count_eq_card_filter_range,
exact finset.card_mono (λ x hx, hp.mem_to_finset.2 (mem_filter.1 hx).2)
end
lemma count_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hp : (set_of p).finite) (hpn : p n) :
count p n < hp.to_finset.card :=
(count_lt_count_succ_iff.2 hpn).trans_le (count_le_card hp _)
variable {q : ℕ → Prop}
variable [decidable_pred q]
lemma count_mono_left {n : ℕ} (hpq : ∀ k, p k → q k) : count p n ≤ count q n :=
begin
simp only [count_eq_card_filter_range],
exact card_le_of_subset ((range n).monotone_filter_right hpq),
end
end count
end nat
|
4fb8aefae4a451febde554945f661c461273e02d | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/order/filter/bases.lean | c42d14439a69d3f2d27d0d51d60b89a42a2ce3d4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,950 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import order.filter.basic
import data.set.countable
import data.pprod
/-!
# Filter bases
A filter basis `B : filter_basis α` on a type `α` is a nonempty collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element of
the collection. Compared to filters, filter bases do not require that any set containing
an element of `B` belongs to `B`.
A filter basis `B` can be used to construct `B.filter : filter α` such that a set belongs
to `B.filter` if and only if it contains an element of `B`.
Given an indexing type `ι`, a predicate `p : ι → Prop`, and a map `s : ι → set α`,
the proposition `h : filter.is_basis p s` makes sure the range of `s` bounded by `p`
(ie. `s '' set_of p`) defines a filter basis `h.filter_basis`.
If one already has a filter `l` on `α`, `filter.has_basis l p s` (where `p : ι → Prop`
and `s : ι → set α` as above) means that a set belongs to `l` if and
only if it contains some `s i` with `p i`. It implies `h : filter.is_basis p s`, and
`l = h.filter_basis.filter`. The point of this definition is that checking statements
involving elements of `l` often reduces to checking them on the basis elements.
We define a function `has_basis.index (h : filter.has_basis l p s) (t) (ht : t ∈ l)` that returns
some index `i` such that `p i` and `s i ⊆ t`. This function can be useful to avoid manual
destruction of `h.mem_iff.mpr ht` using `cases` or `let`.
This file also introduces more restricted classes of bases, involving monotonicity or
countability. In particular, for `l : filter α`, `l.is_countably_generated` means
there is a countable set of sets which generates `s`. This is reformulated in term of bases,
and consequences are derived.
## Main statements
* `has_basis.mem_iff`, `has_basis.mem_of_superset`, `has_basis.mem_of_mem` : restate `t ∈ f`
in terms of a basis;
* `basis_sets` : all sets of a filter form a basis;
* `has_basis.inf`, `has_basis.inf_principal`, `has_basis.prod`, `has_basis.prod_self`,
`has_basis.map`, `has_basis.comap` : combinators to construct filters of `l ⊓ l'`,
`l ⊓ 𝓟 t`, `l ×ᶠ l'`, `l ×ᶠ l`, `l.map f`, `l.comap f` respectively;
* `has_basis.le_iff`, `has_basis.ge_iff`, has_basis.le_basis_iff` : restate `l ≤ l'` in terms
of bases.
* `has_basis.tendsto_right_iff`, `has_basis.tendsto_left_iff`, `has_basis.tendsto_iff` : restate
`tendsto f l l'` in terms of bases.
* `is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antitone_basis` : proves a filter is
countably generated if and only if it admits a basis parametrized by a
decreasing sequence of sets indexed by `ℕ`.
* `tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto ` : an abstract version of "sequentially continuous implies continuous".
## Implementation notes
As with `Union`/`bUnion`/`sUnion`, there are three different approaches to filter bases:
* `has_basis l s`, `s : set (set α)`;
* `has_basis l s`, `s : ι → set α`;
* `has_basis l p s`, `p : ι → Prop`, `s : ι → set α`.
We use the latter one because, e.g., `𝓝 x` in an `emetric_space` or in a `metric_space` has a basis
of this form. The other two can be emulated using `s = id` or `p = λ _, true`.
With this approach sometimes one needs to `simp` the statement provided by the `has_basis`
machinery, e.g., `simp only [exists_prop, true_and]` or `simp only [forall_const]` can help
with the case `p = λ _, true`.
-/
open set filter
open_locale filter classical
section sort
variables {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*}
/-- A filter basis `B` on a type `α` is a nonempty collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element
of the collection. -/
structure filter_basis (α : Type*) :=
(sets : set (set α))
(nonempty : sets.nonempty)
(inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → ∃ z ∈ sets, z ⊆ x ∩ y)
instance filter_basis.nonempty_sets (B : filter_basis α) : nonempty B.sets := B.nonempty.to_subtype
/-- If `B` is a filter basis on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ B` as
on paper. -/
@[reducible]
instance {α : Type*}: has_mem (set α) (filter_basis α) := ⟨λ U B, U ∈ B.sets⟩
-- For illustration purposes, the filter basis defining (at_top : filter ℕ)
instance : inhabited (filter_basis ℕ) :=
⟨{ sets := range Ici,
nonempty := ⟨Ici 0, mem_range_self 0⟩,
inter_sets := begin
rintros _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨Ici (max n m), mem_range_self _, _⟩,
rintros p p_in,
split ; rw mem_Ici at *,
exact le_of_max_le_left p_in,
exact le_of_max_le_right p_in,
end }⟩
/-- `is_basis p s` means the image of `s` bounded by `p` is a filter basis. -/
protected structure filter.is_basis (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) : Prop :=
(nonempty : ∃ i, p i)
(inter : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → ∃ k, p k ∧ s k ⊆ s i ∩ s j)
namespace filter
namespace is_basis
/-- Constructs a filter basis from an indexed family of sets satisfying `is_basis`. -/
protected def filter_basis {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (h : is_basis p s) : filter_basis α :=
{ sets := {t | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = t},
nonempty := let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.nonempty in ⟨s i, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩⟩,
inter_sets := by { rintros _ _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩,
rcases h.inter hi hj with ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩,
exact ⟨_, ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩, hk'⟩ } }
variables {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (h : is_basis p s)
lemma mem_filter_basis_iff {U : set α} : U ∈ h.filter_basis ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U :=
iff.rfl
end is_basis
end filter
namespace filter_basis
/-- The filter associated to a filter basis. -/
protected def filter (B : filter_basis α) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ s},
univ_sets := let ⟨s, s_in⟩ := B.nonempty in ⟨s, s_in, s.subset_univ⟩,
sets_of_superset := λ x y ⟨s, s_in, h⟩ hxy, ⟨s, s_in, set.subset.trans h hxy⟩,
inter_sets := λ x y ⟨s, s_in, hs⟩ ⟨t, t_in, ht⟩,
let ⟨u, u_in, u_sub⟩ := B.inter_sets s_in t_in in
⟨u, u_in, set.subset.trans u_sub $ set.inter_subset_inter hs ht⟩ }
lemma mem_filter_iff (B : filter_basis α) {U : set α} : U ∈ B.filter ↔ ∃ s ∈ B, s ⊆ U :=
iff.rfl
lemma mem_filter_of_mem (B : filter_basis α) {U : set α} : U ∈ B → U ∈ B.filter:=
λ U_in, ⟨U, U_in, subset.refl _⟩
lemma eq_infi_principal (B : filter_basis α) : B.filter = ⨅ s : B.sets, 𝓟 s :=
begin
have : directed (≥) (λ (s : B.sets), 𝓟 (s : set α)),
{ rintros ⟨U, U_in⟩ ⟨V, V_in⟩,
rcases B.inter_sets U_in V_in with ⟨W, W_in, W_sub⟩,
use [W, W_in],
simp only [ge_iff_le, le_principal_iff, mem_principal, subtype.coe_mk],
exact subset_inter_iff.mp W_sub },
ext U,
simp [mem_filter_iff, mem_infi_of_directed this]
end
protected lemma generate (B : filter_basis α) : generate B.sets = B.filter :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ intros U U_in,
rcases B.mem_filter_iff.mp U_in with ⟨V, V_in, h⟩,
exact generate_sets.superset (generate_sets.basic V_in) h },
{ rw sets_iff_generate,
apply mem_filter_of_mem }
end
end filter_basis
namespace filter
namespace is_basis
variables {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α}
/-- Constructs a filter from an indexed family of sets satisfying `is_basis`. -/
protected def filter (h : is_basis p s) : filter α := h.filter_basis.filter
protected lemma mem_filter_iff (h : is_basis p s) {U : set α} :
U ∈ h.filter ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ U :=
begin
erw [h.filter_basis.mem_filter_iff],
simp only [mem_filter_basis_iff h, exists_prop],
split,
{ rintros ⟨_, ⟨i, pi, rfl⟩, h⟩,
tauto },
{ tauto }
end
lemma filter_eq_generate (h : is_basis p s) : h.filter = generate {U | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U} :=
by erw h.filter_basis.generate ; refl
end is_basis
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a basis `s : ι → set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`. -/
protected structure has_basis (l : filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) : Prop :=
(mem_iff' : ∀ (t : set α), t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t)
section same_type
variables {l l' : filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} {i : ι}
{p' : ι' → Prop} {s' : ι' → set α} {i' : ι'}
lemma has_basis_generate (s : set (set α)) :
(generate s).has_basis (λ t, finite t ∧ t ⊆ s) (λ t, ⋂₀ t) :=
⟨begin
intro U,
rw mem_generate_iff,
apply exists_congr,
tauto
end⟩
/-- The smallest filter basis containing a given collection of sets. -/
def filter_basis.of_sets (s : set (set α)) : filter_basis α :=
{ sets := sInter '' { t | finite t ∧ t ⊆ s},
nonempty := ⟨univ, ∅, ⟨⟨finite_empty, empty_subset s⟩, sInter_empty⟩⟩,
inter_sets := begin
rintros _ _ ⟨a, ⟨fina, suba⟩, rfl⟩ ⟨b, ⟨finb, subb⟩, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨⋂₀ (a ∪ b), mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨fina.union finb, union_subset suba subb⟩,
by rw sInter_union⟩,
end }
/-- Definition of `has_basis` unfolded with implicit set argument. -/
lemma has_basis.mem_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) : t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
hl.mem_iff' t
lemma has_basis.eq_of_same_basis (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p s) : l = l' :=
begin
ext t,
rw [hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff]
end
lemma has_basis_iff : l.has_basis p s ↔ ∀ t, t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
⟨λ ⟨h⟩, h, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma has_basis.ex_mem (h : l.has_basis p s) : ∃ i, p i :=
let ⟨i, pi, h⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp univ_mem in ⟨i, pi⟩
protected lemma has_basis.nonempty (h : l.has_basis p s) : nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_exists h.ex_mem
protected lemma is_basis.has_basis (h : is_basis p s) : has_basis h.filter p s :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [h.mem_filter_iff, exists_prop]⟩
lemma has_basis.mem_of_superset (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hi : p i) (ht : s i ⊆ t) : t ∈ l :=
(hl.mem_iff).2 ⟨i, hi, ht⟩
lemma has_basis.mem_of_mem (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hi : p i) : s i ∈ l :=
hl.mem_of_superset hi $ subset.refl _
/-- Index of a basis set such that `s i ⊆ t` as an element of `subtype p`. -/
noncomputable def has_basis.index (h : l.has_basis p s) (t : set α) (ht : t ∈ l) :
{i : ι // p i} :=
⟨(h.mem_iff.1 ht).some, (h.mem_iff.1 ht).some_spec.fst⟩
lemma has_basis.property_index (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : p (h.index t ht) :=
(h.index t ht).2
lemma has_basis.set_index_mem (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : s (h.index t ht) ∈ l :=
h.mem_of_mem $ h.property_index _
lemma has_basis.set_index_subset (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : s (h.index t ht) ⊆ t :=
(h.mem_iff.1 ht).some_spec.snd
lemma has_basis.is_basis (h : l.has_basis p s) : is_basis p s :=
{ nonempty := let ⟨i, hi, H⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp univ_mem in ⟨i, hi⟩,
inter := λ i j hi hj, by simpa [h.mem_iff]
using l.inter_sets (h.mem_of_mem hi) (h.mem_of_mem hj) }
lemma has_basis.filter_eq (h : l.has_basis p s) : h.is_basis.filter = l :=
by { ext U, simp [h.mem_iff, is_basis.mem_filter_iff] }
lemma has_basis.eq_generate (h : l.has_basis p s) : l = generate { U | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U } :=
by rw [← h.is_basis.filter_eq_generate, h.filter_eq]
lemma generate_eq_generate_inter (s : set (set α)) :
generate s = generate (sInter '' { t | finite t ∧ t ⊆ s}) :=
by erw [(filter_basis.of_sets s).generate, ← (has_basis_generate s).filter_eq] ; refl
lemma of_sets_filter_eq_generate (s : set (set α)) : (filter_basis.of_sets s).filter = generate s :=
by rw [← (filter_basis.of_sets s).generate, generate_eq_generate_inter s] ; refl
protected lemma _root_.filter_basis.has_basis {α : Type*} (B : filter_basis α) :
has_basis (B.filter) (λ s : set α, s ∈ B) id :=
⟨λ t, B.mem_filter_iff⟩
lemma has_basis.to_has_basis' (hl : l.has_basis p s) (h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → s' i' ∈ l) : l.has_basis p' s' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, ⟨λ ht, _, λ ⟨i', hi', ht⟩, mem_of_superset (h' i' hi') ht⟩⟩,
rcases hl.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨i, hi, ht⟩,
rcases h i hi with ⟨i', hi', hs's⟩,
exact ⟨i', hi', subset.trans hs's ht⟩
end
lemma has_basis.to_has_basis (hl : l.has_basis p s) (h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i') : l.has_basis p' s' :=
hl.to_has_basis' h $ λ i' hi', let ⟨i, hi, hss'⟩ := h' i' hi' in hl.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, hss'⟩
lemma has_basis.to_subset (hl : l.has_basis p s) {t : ι → set α} (h : ∀ i, p i → t i ⊆ s i)
(ht : ∀ i, p i → t i ∈ l) : l.has_basis p t :=
hl.to_has_basis' (λ i hi, ⟨i, hi, h i hi⟩) ht
lemma has_basis.eventually_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, q x) ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s i → q x :=
by simpa using hl.mem_iff
lemma has_basis.frequently_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, q x) ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ x ∈ s i, q x :=
by simp [filter.frequently, hl.eventually_iff]
lemma has_basis.exists_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {P : set α → Prop}
(mono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → P t → P s) :
(∃ s ∈ l, P s) ↔ ∃ (i) (hi : p i), P (s i) :=
⟨λ ⟨s, hs, hP⟩, let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := hl.mem_iff.1 hs in ⟨i, hi, mono his hP⟩,
λ ⟨i, hi, hP⟩, ⟨s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, hP⟩⟩
lemma has_basis.forall_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {P : set α → Prop}
(mono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ l, P s) ↔ ∀ i, p i → P (s i) :=
⟨λ H i hi, H (s i) $ hl.mem_of_mem hi,
λ H s hs, let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := hl.mem_iff.1 hs in mono his (H i hi)⟩
lemma has_basis.ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
ne_bot l ↔ (∀ {i}, p i → (s i).nonempty) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.symm.trans $ hl.forall_iff $ λ _ _, nonempty.mono
lemma has_basis.eq_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
l = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 $ ne_bot_iff.symm.trans $ hl.ne_bot_iff.trans $
by simp only [not_exists, not_and, ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty]
lemma basis_sets (l : filter α) : l.has_basis (λ s : set α, s ∈ l) id :=
⟨λ t, exists_mem_subset_iff.symm⟩
lemma has_basis_self {l : filter α} {P : set α → Prop} :
has_basis l (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ P s) id ↔ ∀ t ∈ l, ∃ r ∈ l, P r ∧ r ⊆ t :=
begin
simp only [has_basis_iff, exists_prop, id, and_assoc],
exact forall_congr (λ s, ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h, λ ⟨t, hl, hP, hts⟩, mem_of_superset hl hts⟩⟩)
end
/-- If `{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l` and each `s i` includes `s j` such that
`p j ∧ q j`, then `{s j | p j ∧ q j}` is a basis of `l`. -/
lemma has_basis.restrict (h : l.has_basis p s) {q : ι → Prop}
(hq : ∀ i, p i → ∃ j, p j ∧ q j ∧ s j ⊆ s i) :
l.has_basis (λ i, p i ∧ q i) s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, ⟨λ ht, _, λ ⟨i, hpi, hti⟩, h.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, hpi.1, hti⟩⟩⟩,
rcases h.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨i, hpi, hti⟩,
rcases hq i hpi with ⟨j, hpj, hqj, hji⟩,
exact ⟨j, ⟨hpj, hqj⟩, subset.trans hji hti⟩
end
/-- If `{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l` and `V ∈ l`, then `{s i | p i ∧ s i ⊆ V}`
is a basis of `l`. -/
lemma has_basis.restrict_subset (h : l.has_basis p s) {V : set α} (hV : V ∈ l) :
l.has_basis (λ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ V) s :=
h.restrict $ λ i hi, (h.mem_iff.1 (inter_mem hV (h.mem_of_mem hi))).imp $
λ j hj, ⟨hj.fst, subset_inter_iff.1 hj.snd⟩
lemma has_basis.has_basis_self_subset {p : set α → Prop} (h : l.has_basis (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ p s) id)
{V : set α} (hV : V ∈ l) : l.has_basis (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ p s ∧ s ⊆ V) id :=
by simpa only [and_assoc] using h.restrict_subset hV
theorem has_basis.ge_iff (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → s' i' ∈ l :=
⟨λ h i' hi', h $ hl'.mem_of_mem hi',
λ h s hs, let ⟨i', hi', hs⟩ := hl'.mem_iff.1 hs in mem_of_superset (h _ hi') hs⟩
theorem has_basis.le_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ t ∈ l', ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
by simp only [le_def, hl.mem_iff]
theorem has_basis.le_basis_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ s' i' :=
by simp only [hl'.ge_iff, hl.mem_iff]
lemma has_basis.ext (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s')
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i') : l = l' :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw hl.le_basis_iff hl',
simpa using h' },
{ rw hl'.le_basis_iff hl,
simpa using h },
end
lemma has_basis.inf' (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊓ l').has_basis (λ i : pprod ι ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∩ s' i.2) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
split,
{ simp only [mem_inf_iff, exists_prop, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff],
rintros ⟨t, ⟨i, hi, ht⟩, t', ⟨i', hi', ht'⟩, rfl⟩,
use [⟨i, i'⟩, ⟨hi, hi'⟩, inter_subset_inter ht ht'] },
{ rintros ⟨⟨i, i'⟩, ⟨hi, hi'⟩, H⟩,
exact mem_inf_of_inter (hl.mem_of_mem hi) (hl'.mem_of_mem hi') H }
end⟩
lemma has_basis.inf {ι ι' : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {p' : ι' → Prop}
{s' : ι' → set α} (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊓ l').has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∩ s' i.2) :=
(hl.inf' hl').to_has_basis (λ i hi, ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩, hi, subset.rfl⟩)
(λ i hi, ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩, hi, subset.rfl⟩)
lemma has_basis_principal (t : set α) : (𝓟 t).has_basis (λ i : unit, true) (λ i, t) :=
⟨λ U, by simp⟩
lemma has_basis_pure (x : α) : (pure x : filter α).has_basis (λ i : unit, true) (λ i, {x}) :=
by simp only [← principal_singleton, has_basis_principal]
lemma has_basis.sup' (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊔ l').has_basis (λ i : pprod ι ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∪ s' i.2) :=
⟨begin
intros t,
simp only [mem_sup, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff, pprod.exists, union_subset_iff, exists_prop,
and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_left],
simp only [← and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_right, and_comm]
end⟩
lemma has_basis.sup {ι ι' : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {p' : ι' → Prop}
{s' : ι' → set α} (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊔ l').has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∪ s' i.2) :=
(hl.sup' hl').to_has_basis (λ i hi, ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩, hi, subset.rfl⟩)
(λ i hi, ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩, hi, subset.rfl⟩)
lemma has_basis_supr {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Type*} {l : ι → filter α}
{p : Π i, ι' i → Prop} {s : Π i, ι' i → set α} (hl : ∀ i, (l i).has_basis (p i) (s i)) :
(⨆ i, l i).has_basis (λ f : Π i, ι' i, ∀ i, p i (f i)) (λ f : Π i, ι' i, ⋃ i, s i (f i)) :=
has_basis_iff.mpr $ λ t, by simp only [has_basis_iff, (hl _).mem_iff, classical.skolem,
forall_and_distrib, Union_subset_iff, mem_supr]
lemma has_basis.sup_principal (hl : l.has_basis p s) (t : set α) :
(l ⊔ 𝓟 t).has_basis p (λ i, s i ∪ t) :=
⟨λ u, by simp only [(hl.sup' (has_basis_principal t)).mem_iff, pprod.exists, exists_prop, and_true,
unique.exists_iff]⟩
lemma has_basis.sup_pure (hl : l.has_basis p s) (x : α) :
(l ⊔ pure x).has_basis p (λ i, s i ∪ {x}) :=
by simp only [← principal_singleton, hl.sup_principal]
lemma has_basis.inf_principal (hl : l.has_basis p s) (s' : set α) :
(l ⊓ 𝓟 s').has_basis p (λ i, s i ∩ s') :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [mem_inf_principal, hl.mem_iff, subset_def, mem_set_of_eq,
mem_inter_iff, and_imp]⟩
lemma has_basis.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i) ⦃i'⦄ (hi' : p' i'), (s i ∩ s' i').nonempty :=
(hl.inf' hl').ne_bot_iff.trans $ by simp [@forall_swap _ ι']
lemma has_basis.inf_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i) ⦃s'⦄ (hs' : s' ∈ l'), (s i ∩ s').nonempty :=
hl.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff l'.basis_sets
lemma has_basis.inf_principal_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {t : set α} :
ne_bot (l ⊓ 𝓟 t) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i), (s i ∩ t).nonempty :=
(hl.inf_principal t).ne_bot_iff
lemma has_basis.disjoint_basis_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
disjoint l l' ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i) i' (hi' : p' i'), disjoint (s i) (s' i') :=
not_iff_not.mp $ by simp only [disjoint_iff, ← ne.def, ← ne_bot_iff, hl.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff hl',
not_exists, bot_eq_empty, ne_empty_iff_nonempty, inf_eq_inter]
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃s : set α⦄ (hs : s ∈ l) ⦃s'⦄ (hs' : s' ∈ l'), (s ∩ s').nonempty :=
l.basis_sets.inf_ne_bot_iff
lemma inf_principal_ne_bot_iff {s : set α} :
ne_bot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ U ∈ l, (U ∩ s).nonempty :=
l.basis_sets.inf_principal_ne_bot_iff
lemma mem_iff_inf_principal_compl {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ f ↔ f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥ :=
begin
refine not_iff_not.1 ((inf_principal_ne_bot_iff.trans _).symm.trans ne_bot_iff),
exact ⟨λ h hs, by simpa [empty_not_nonempty] using h s hs,
λ hs t ht, inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 $ λ hts, hs $ mem_of_superset ht hts⟩,
end
lemma not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∉ f ↔ ne_bot (f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ) :=
(not_congr mem_iff_inf_principal_compl).trans ne_bot_iff.symm
@[simp] lemma disjoint_principal_right {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
disjoint f (𝓟 s) ↔ sᶜ ∈ f :=
by rw [mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, disjoint_iff]
@[simp] lemma disjoint_principal_left {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
disjoint (𝓟 s) f ↔ sᶜ ∈ f :=
by rw [disjoint.comm, disjoint_principal_right]
@[simp] lemma disjoint_principal_principal {s t : set α} :
disjoint (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t) ↔ disjoint s t :=
by simp [disjoint_iff_subset_compl_left]
alias disjoint_principal_principal ↔ _ disjoint.filter_principal
@[simp] lemma disjoint_pure_pure {x y : α} :
disjoint (pure x : filter α) (pure y) ↔ x ≠ y :=
by simp only [← principal_singleton, disjoint_principal_principal, disjoint_singleton]
lemma le_iff_forall_inf_principal_compl {f g : filter α} :
f ≤ g ↔ ∀ V ∈ g, f ⊓ 𝓟 Vᶜ = ⊥ :=
forall₂_congr $ λ _ _, mem_iff_inf_principal_compl
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left {f g : filter α} :
ne_bot (f ⊓ g) ↔ ∀ {p : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
by simpa only [inf_ne_bot_iff, frequently_iff, exists_prop, and_comm]
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_right {f g : filter α} :
ne_bot (f ⊓ g) ↔ ∀ {p : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in g, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
by { rw inf_comm, exact inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left }
lemma has_basis.eq_binfi (h : l.has_basis p s) :
l = ⨅ i (_ : p i), 𝓟 (s i) :=
eq_binfi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem $ λ t, by simp only [h.mem_iff, mem_principal]
lemma has_basis.eq_infi (h : l.has_basis (λ _, true) s) :
l = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i) :=
by simpa only [infi_true] using h.eq_binfi
lemma has_basis_infi_principal {s : ι → set α} (h : directed (≥) s) [nonempty ι] :
(⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ _, true) s :=
⟨begin
refine λ t, (mem_infi_of_directed (h.mono_comp _ _) t).trans $
by simp only [exists_prop, true_and, mem_principal],
exact λ _ _, principal_mono.2
end⟩
/-- If `s : ι → set α` is an indexed family of sets, then finite intersections of `s i` form a basis
of `⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)`. -/
lemma has_basis_infi_principal_finite {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set α) :
(⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ t : set ι, finite t) (λ t, ⋂ i ∈ t, s i) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ U, (mem_infi_finite _).trans _⟩,
simp only [infi_principal_finset, mem_Union, mem_principal, exists_prop,
exists_finite_iff_finset, finset.set_bInter_coe]
end
lemma has_basis_binfi_principal {s : β → set α} {S : set β} (h : directed_on (s ⁻¹'o (≥)) S)
(ne : S.nonempty) :
(⨅ i ∈ S, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ i, i ∈ S) s :=
⟨begin
refine λ t, (mem_binfi_of_directed _ ne).trans $ by simp only [mem_principal],
rw [directed_on_iff_directed, ← directed_comp, (∘)] at h ⊢,
apply h.mono_comp _ _,
exact λ _ _, principal_mono.2
end⟩
lemma has_basis_binfi_principal' {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α}
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, p j → ∃ k (h : p k), s k ⊆ s i ∧ s k ⊆ s j) (ne : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅ i (h : p i), 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis p s :=
filter.has_basis_binfi_principal h ne
lemma has_basis.map (f : α → β) (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.map f).has_basis p (λ i, f '' (s i)) :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [mem_map, image_subset_iff, hl.mem_iff, preimage]⟩
lemma has_basis.comap (f : β → α) (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.comap f).has_basis p (λ i, f ⁻¹' (s i)) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
simp only [mem_comap, exists_prop, hl.mem_iff],
split,
{ rintros ⟨t', ⟨i, hi, ht'⟩, H⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, subset.trans (preimage_mono ht') H⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact ⟨s i, ⟨i, hi, subset.refl _⟩, H⟩ }
end⟩
lemma comap_has_basis (f : α → β) (l : filter β) :
has_basis (comap f l) (λ s : set β, s ∈ l) (λ s, f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨λ t, mem_comap⟩
lemma has_basis.prod_self (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l ×ᶠ l).has_basis p (λ i, s i ×ˢ s i) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
apply mem_prod_iff.trans,
split,
{ rintros ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, H⟩,
rcases hl.mem_iff.1 (inter_mem ht₁ ht₂) with ⟨i, hi, ht⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, λ p ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩, H ⟨(ht hp₁).1, (ht hp₂).2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact ⟨s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, H⟩ }
end⟩
lemma mem_prod_self_iff {s} : s ∈ l ×ᶠ l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
l.basis_sets.prod_self.mem_iff
lemma has_basis.sInter_sets (h : has_basis l p s) :
⋂₀ l.sets = ⋂ i (hi : p i), s i :=
begin
ext x,
suffices : (∀ t ∈ l, x ∈ t) ↔ ∀ i, p i → x ∈ s i,
by simpa only [mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq, mem_sInter],
simp_rw h.mem_iff,
split,
{ intros h i hi,
exact h (s i) ⟨i, hi, subset.refl _⟩ },
{ rintros h _ ⟨i, hi, sub⟩,
exact sub (h i hi) },
end
variables {ι'' : Type*} [preorder ι''] (l) (s'' : ι'' → set α)
/-- `is_antitone_basis s` means the image of `s` is a filter basis such that `s` is decreasing. -/
@[protect_proj] structure is_antitone_basis extends is_basis (λ _, true) s'' : Prop :=
(antitone : antitone s'')
/-- We say that a filter `l` has an antitone basis `s : ι → set α`, if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t`
includes `s i` for some `i`, and `s` is decreasing. -/
@[protect_proj] structure has_antitone_basis (l : filter α) (s : ι'' → set α)
extends has_basis l (λ _, true) s : Prop :=
(antitone : antitone s)
end same_type
section two_types
variables {la : filter α} {pa : ι → Prop} {sa : ι → set α}
{lb : filter β} {pb : ι' → Prop} {sb : ι' → set β} {f : α → β}
lemma has_basis.tendsto_left_iff (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ t ∈ lb, ∃ i (hi : pa i), maps_to f (sa i) t :=
by { simp only [tendsto, (hla.map f).le_iff, image_subset_iff], refl }
lemma has_basis.tendsto_right_iff (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ i (hi : pb i), ∀ᶠ x in la, f x ∈ sb i :=
by simpa only [tendsto, hlb.ge_iff, mem_map, filter.eventually]
lemma has_basis.tendsto_iff (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ ib (hib : pb ib), ∃ ia (hia : pa ia), ∀ x ∈ sa ia, f x ∈ sb ib :=
by simp [hlb.tendsto_right_iff, hla.eventually_iff]
lemma tendsto.basis_left (H : tendsto f la lb) (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) :
∀ t ∈ lb, ∃ i (hi : pa i), maps_to f (sa i) t :=
hla.tendsto_left_iff.1 H
lemma tendsto.basis_right (H : tendsto f la lb) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
∀ i (hi : pb i), ∀ᶠ x in la, f x ∈ sb i :=
hlb.tendsto_right_iff.1 H
lemma tendsto.basis_both (H : tendsto f la lb) (hla : la.has_basis pa sa)
(hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
∀ ib (hib : pb ib), ∃ ia (hia : pa ia), ∀ x ∈ sa ia, f x ∈ sb ib :=
(hla.tendsto_iff hlb).1 H
lemma has_basis.prod'' (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
(la ×ᶠ lb).has_basis (λ i : pprod ι ι', pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2) (λ i, sa i.1 ×ˢ sb i.2) :=
(hla.comap prod.fst).inf' (hlb.comap prod.snd)
lemma has_basis.prod {ι ι' : Type*} {pa : ι → Prop} {sa : ι → set α} {pb : ι' → Prop}
{sb : ι' → set β} (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
(la ×ᶠ lb).has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2) (λ i, sa i.1 ×ˢ sb i.2) :=
(hla.comap prod.fst).inf (hlb.comap prod.snd)
lemma has_basis.prod' {la : filter α} {lb : filter β} {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop}
{sa : ι → set α} {sb : ι → set β}
(hla : la.has_basis p sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis p sb)
(h_dir : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → ∃ k, p k ∧ sa k ⊆ sa i ∧ sb k ⊆ sb j) :
(la ×ᶠ lb).has_basis p (λ i, sa i ×ˢ sb i) :=
begin
simp only [has_basis_iff, (hla.prod hlb).mem_iff],
refine λ t, ⟨_, _⟩,
{ rintros ⟨⟨i, j⟩, ⟨hi, hj⟩, hsub : sa i ×ˢ sb j ⊆ t⟩,
rcases h_dir hi hj with ⟨k, hk, ki, kj⟩,
exact ⟨k, hk, (set.prod_mono ki kj).trans hsub⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨i, hi, h⟩,
exact ⟨⟨i, i⟩, ⟨hi, hi⟩, h⟩ },
end
end two_types
end filter
end sort
namespace filter
variables {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
/-- `is_countably_generated f` means `f = generate s` for some countable `s`. -/
class is_countably_generated (f : filter α) : Prop :=
(out [] : ∃ s : set (set α), countable s ∧ f = generate s)
/-- `is_countable_basis p s` means the image of `s` bounded by `p` is a countable filter basis. -/
structure is_countable_basis (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) extends is_basis p s : Prop :=
(countable : countable $ set_of p)
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a countable basis `s : ι → set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`, and the set
defined by `p` is countable. -/
structure has_countable_basis (l : filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α)
extends has_basis l p s : Prop :=
(countable : countable $ set_of p)
/-- A countable filter basis `B` on a type `α` is a nonempty countable collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element
of the collection. -/
structure countable_filter_basis (α : Type*) extends filter_basis α :=
(countable : countable sets)
-- For illustration purposes, the countable filter basis defining (at_top : filter ℕ)
instance nat.inhabited_countable_filter_basis : inhabited (countable_filter_basis ℕ) :=
⟨{ countable := countable_range (λ n, Ici n),
..(default : filter_basis ℕ) }⟩
lemma has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated {f : filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α}
(h : f.has_countable_basis p s) :
f.is_countably_generated :=
⟨⟨{t | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = t}, h.countable.image s, h.to_has_basis.eq_generate⟩⟩
lemma antitone_seq_of_seq (s : ℕ → set α) :
∃ t : ℕ → set α, antitone t ∧ (⨅ i, 𝓟 $ s i) = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (t i) :=
begin
use λ n, ⋂ m ≤ n, s m, split,
{ exact λ i j hij, bInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hij) (λ n hn, subset.refl _) },
apply le_antisymm; rw le_infi_iff; intro i,
{ rw le_principal_iff, refine (bInter_mem (finite_le_nat _)).2 (λ j hji, _),
rw ← le_principal_iff, apply infi_le_of_le j _, exact le_rfl },
{ apply infi_le_of_le i _, rw principal_mono, intro a, simp, intro h, apply h, refl },
end
lemma countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq [complete_lattice α] {B : set ι} (Bcbl : countable B)
(Bne : B.nonempty) (f : ι → α) :
∃ (x : ℕ → ι), (⨅ t ∈ B, f t) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
begin
rw countable_iff_exists_surjective_to_subtype Bne at Bcbl,
rcases Bcbl with ⟨g, gsurj⟩,
rw infi_subtype',
use (λ n, g n), apply le_antisymm; rw le_infi_iff,
{ intro i, apply infi_le_of_le (g i) _, apply le_rfl },
{ intros a, rcases gsurj a with ⟨i, rfl⟩, apply infi_le }
end
lemma countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq' [complete_lattice α] {B : set ι} (Bcbl : countable B) (f : ι → α)
{i₀ : ι} (h : f i₀ = ⊤) :
∃ (x : ℕ → ι), (⨅ t ∈ B, f t) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
begin
cases B.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hB Bnonempty,
{ rw [hB, infi_emptyset],
use λ n, i₀,
simp [h] },
{ exact countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq Bcbl Bnonempty f }
end
lemma countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi {B : set (set α)} (Bcbl : countable B) :
∃ (x : ℕ → set α), (⨅ t ∈ B, 𝓟 t) = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (x i) :=
countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq' Bcbl 𝓟 principal_univ
section is_countably_generated
/-- If `f` is countably generated and `f.has_basis p s`, then `f` admits a decreasing basis
enumerated by natural numbers such that all sets have the form `s i`. More precisely, there is a
sequence `i n` such that `p (i n)` for all `n` and `s (i n)` is a decreasing sequence of sets which
forms a basis of `f`-/
lemma has_basis.exists_antitone_subbasis {f : filter α} [h : f.is_countably_generated]
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (hs : f.has_basis p s) :
∃ x : ℕ → ι, (∀ i, p (x i)) ∧ f.has_antitone_basis (λ i, s (x i)) :=
begin
obtain ⟨x', hx'⟩ : ∃ x : ℕ → set α, f = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (x i),
{ unfreezingI { rcases h with ⟨s, hsc, rfl⟩ },
rw generate_eq_binfi,
exact countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi hsc },
have : ∀ i, x' i ∈ f := λ i, hx'.symm ▸ (infi_le (λ i, 𝓟 (x' i)) i) (mem_principal_self _),
let x : ℕ → {i : ι // p i} := λ n, nat.rec_on n (hs.index _ $ this 0)
(λ n xn, (hs.index _ $ inter_mem (this $ n + 1) (hs.mem_of_mem xn.coe_prop))),
have x_mono : antitone (λ i, s (x i)),
{ refine antitone_nat_of_succ_le (λ i, _),
exact (hs.set_index_subset _).trans (inter_subset_right _ _) },
have x_subset : ∀ i, s (x i) ⊆ x' i,
{ rintro (_|i),
exacts [hs.set_index_subset _, subset.trans (hs.set_index_subset _) (inter_subset_left _ _)] },
refine ⟨λ i, x i, λ i, (x i).2, _⟩,
have : (⨅ i, 𝓟 (s (x i))).has_antitone_basis (λ i, s (x i)) :=
⟨has_basis_infi_principal (directed_of_sup x_mono), x_mono⟩,
convert this,
exact le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, le_principal_iff.2 $ by cases i; apply hs.set_index_mem)
(hx'.symm ▸ le_infi (λ i, le_principal_iff.2 $
this.to_has_basis.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, trivial, x_subset i⟩))
end
/-- A countably generated filter admits a basis formed by an antitone sequence of sets. -/
lemma exists_antitone_basis (f : filter α) [f.is_countably_generated] :
∃ x : ℕ → set α, f.has_antitone_basis x :=
let ⟨x, hxf, hx⟩ := f.basis_sets.exists_antitone_subbasis in ⟨x, hx⟩
lemma exists_antitone_seq (f : filter α) [f.is_countably_generated] :
∃ x : ℕ → set α, antitone x ∧ ∀ {s}, (s ∈ f ↔ ∃ i, x i ⊆ s) :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := f.exists_antitone_basis in
⟨x, hx.antitone, λ s, by simp [hx.to_has_basis.mem_iff]⟩
instance inf.is_countably_generated (f g : filter α) [is_countably_generated f]
[is_countably_generated g] :
is_countably_generated (f ⊓ g) :=
begin
rcases f.exists_antitone_basis with ⟨s, hs⟩,
rcases g.exists_antitone_basis with ⟨t, ht⟩,
exact has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated
⟨hs.to_has_basis.inf ht.to_has_basis, set.countable_encodable _⟩
end
instance comap.is_countably_generated (l : filter β) [l.is_countably_generated] (f : α → β) :
(comap f l).is_countably_generated :=
let ⟨x, hxl⟩ := l.exists_antitone_basis in
has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated ⟨hxl.to_has_basis.comap _, countable_encodable _⟩
instance sup.is_countably_generated (f g : filter α) [is_countably_generated f]
[is_countably_generated g] :
is_countably_generated (f ⊔ g) :=
begin
rcases f.exists_antitone_basis with ⟨s, hs⟩,
rcases g.exists_antitone_basis with ⟨t, ht⟩,
exact has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated
⟨hs.to_has_basis.sup ht.to_has_basis, set.countable_encodable _⟩
end
end is_countably_generated
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_seq [encodable β] (x : β → set α) :
is_countably_generated (⨅ i, 𝓟 $ x i) :=
begin
use [range x, countable_range x],
rw [generate_eq_binfi, infi_range]
end
lemma is_countably_generated_of_seq {f : filter α} (h : ∃ x : ℕ → set α, f = ⨅ i, 𝓟 $ x i) :
f.is_countably_generated :=
let ⟨x, h⟩ := h in by rw h ; apply is_countably_generated_seq
lemma is_countably_generated_binfi_principal {B : set $ set α} (h : countable B) :
is_countably_generated (⨅ (s ∈ B), 𝓟 s) :=
is_countably_generated_of_seq (countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi h)
lemma is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antitone_basis {f : filter α} :
is_countably_generated f ↔ ∃ x : ℕ → set α, f.has_antitone_basis x :=
begin
split,
{ introI h, exact f.exists_antitone_basis },
{ rintros ⟨x, h⟩,
rw h.to_has_basis.eq_infi,
exact is_countably_generated_seq x },
end
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_principal (s : set α) : is_countably_generated (𝓟 s) :=
is_countably_generated_of_seq ⟨λ _, s, infi_const.symm⟩
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_bot : is_countably_generated (⊥ : filter α) :=
@principal_empty α ▸ is_countably_generated_principal _
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_top : is_countably_generated (⊤ : filter α) :=
@principal_univ α ▸ is_countably_generated_principal _
end filter
|
78fdcc4ba53b7b2fdb25fb13acd11f1972964bae | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/topology/opens.lean | e18248dc78f23dbbab0a046058a35b812f398ebc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,337 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import topology.bases
import topology.homeomorph
/-!
# Open sets
## Summary
We define the subtype of open sets in a topological space.
## Main Definitions
- `opens α` is the type of open subsets of a topological space `α`.
- `open_nhds_of x` is the type of open subsets of a topological space `α` containing `x : α`.
-
-/
open filter set
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
[topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
namespace topological_space
variable (α)
/-- The type of open subsets of a topological space. -/
def opens := {s : set α // is_open s}
variable {α}
namespace opens
instance : has_coe (opens α) (set α) := { coe := subtype.val }
lemma val_eq_coe (U : opens α) : U.1 = ↑U := rfl
/-- the coercion `opens α → set α` applied to a pair is the same as taking the first component -/
lemma coe_mk {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {U : set α} {hU : is_open U} :
↑(⟨U, hU⟩ : opens α) = U := rfl
instance : has_subset (opens α) :=
{ subset := λ U V, (U : set α) ⊆ V }
instance : has_mem α (opens α) :=
{ mem := λ a U, a ∈ (U : set α) }
@[simp] lemma subset_coe {U V : opens α} : ((U : set α) ⊆ (V : set α)) = (U ⊆ V) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_coe {x : α} {U : opens α} : (x ∈ (U : set α)) = (x ∈ U) := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {U V : opens α} (h : (U : set α) = V) : U = V := subtype.ext_iff.mpr h
@[ext] lemma ext_iff {U V : opens α} : (U : set α) = V ↔ U = V :=
⟨opens.ext, congr_arg coe⟩
instance : partial_order (opens α) := subtype.partial_order _
/-- The interior of a set, as an element of `opens`. -/
def interior (s : set α) : opens α := ⟨interior s, is_open_interior⟩
lemma gc : galois_connection (coe : opens α → set α) interior :=
λ U s, ⟨λ h, interior_maximal h U.property, λ h, le_trans h interior_subset⟩
/-- The galois insertion between sets and opens, but ordered by reverse inclusion. -/
def gi : @galois_insertion (order_dual (set α)) (order_dual (opens α)) _ _ interior subtype.val :=
{ choice := λ s hs, ⟨s, interior_eq_iff_open.mp $ le_antisymm interior_subset hs⟩,
gc := gc.dual,
le_l_u := λ _, interior_subset,
choice_eq := λ s hs, le_antisymm interior_subset hs }
@[simp] lemma gi_choice_val {s : order_dual (set α)} {hs} : (gi.choice s hs).val = s := rfl
instance : complete_lattice (opens α) :=
complete_lattice.copy
(@order_dual.complete_lattice _ (galois_insertion.lift_complete_lattice (@gi α _)))
/- le -/ (λ U V, U ⊆ V) rfl
/- top -/ ⟨set.univ, is_open_univ⟩ (subtype.ext_iff_val.mpr interior_univ.symm)
/- bot -/ ⟨∅, is_open_empty⟩ rfl
/- sup -/ (λ U V, ⟨↑U ∪ ↑V, is_open.union U.2 V.2⟩) rfl
/- inf -/ (λ U V, ⟨↑U ∩ ↑V, is_open.inter U.2 V.2⟩)
begin
funext,
apply subtype.ext_iff_val.mpr,
exact (is_open.inter U.2 V.2).interior_eq.symm,
end
/- Sup -/ (λ Us, ⟨⋃₀ (coe '' Us), is_open_sUnion $ λ U hU,
by { rcases hU with ⟨⟨V, hV⟩, h, h'⟩, dsimp at h', subst h', exact hV}⟩)
begin
funext,
apply subtype.ext_iff_val.mpr,
simp [Sup_range],
refl,
end
/- Inf -/ _ rfl
lemma le_def {U V : opens α} : U ≤ V ↔ (U : set α) ≤ (V : set α) :=
by refl
@[simp] lemma mk_inf_mk {U V : set α} {hU : is_open U} {hV : is_open V} :
(⟨U, hU⟩ ⊓ ⟨V, hV⟩ : opens α) = ⟨U ⊓ V, is_open.inter hU hV⟩ := rfl
@[simp,norm_cast] lemma coe_inf {U V : opens α} :
((U ⊓ V : opens α) : set α) = (U : set α) ⊓ (V : set α) := rfl
instance : has_inter (opens α) := ⟨λ U V, U ⊓ V⟩
instance : has_union (opens α) := ⟨λ U V, U ⊔ V⟩
instance : has_emptyc (opens α) := ⟨⊥⟩
instance : inhabited (opens α) := ⟨∅⟩
@[simp] lemma inter_eq (U V : opens α) : U ∩ V = U ⊓ V := rfl
@[simp] lemma union_eq (U V : opens α) : U ∪ V = U ⊔ V := rfl
@[simp] lemma empty_eq : (∅ : opens α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma Sup_s {Us : set (opens α)} : ↑(Sup Us) = ⋃₀ ((coe : _ → set α) '' Us) :=
begin
rw [@galois_connection.l_Sup (opens α) (set α) _ _ (coe : opens α → set α) interior gc Us],
rw [set.sUnion_image]
end
lemma supr_def {ι} (s : ι → opens α) : (⨆ i, s i) = ⟨⋃ i, s i, is_open_Union $ λ i, (s i).2⟩ :=
by { ext, simp only [supr, opens.Sup_s, sUnion_image, bUnion_range], refl }
@[simp] lemma supr_mk {ι} (s : ι → set α) (h : Π i, is_open (s i)) :
(⨆ i, ⟨s i, h i⟩ : opens α) = ⟨⨆ i, s i, is_open_Union h⟩ :=
by { rw supr_def, simp }
@[simp] lemma supr_s {ι} (s : ι → opens α) : ((⨆ i, s i : opens α) : set α) = ⋃ i, s i :=
by simp [supr_def]
@[simp] theorem mem_supr {ι} {x : α} {s : ι → opens α} : x ∈ supr s ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ s i :=
by { rw [←mem_coe], simp, }
@[simp] lemma mem_Sup {Us : set (opens α)} {x : α} : x ∈ Sup Us ↔ ∃ u ∈ Us, x ∈ u :=
by simp_rw [Sup_eq_supr, mem_supr]
lemma open_embedding_of_le {U V : opens α} (i : U ≤ V) :
open_embedding (set.inclusion i) :=
{ inj := set.inclusion_injective i,
induced := (@induced_compose _ _ _ _ (set.inclusion i) coe).symm,
open_range :=
begin
rw set.range_inclusion i,
exact U.property.preimage continuous_subtype_val
end, }
def is_basis (B : set (opens α)) : Prop := is_topological_basis ((coe : _ → set α) '' B)
lemma is_basis_iff_nbhd {B : set (opens α)} :
is_basis B ↔ ∀ {U : opens α} {x}, x ∈ U → ∃ U' ∈ B, x ∈ U' ∧ U' ⊆ U :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rintros ⟨sU, hU⟩ x hx,
rcases h.mem_nhds_iff.mp (is_open.mem_nhds hU hx)
with ⟨sV, ⟨⟨V, H₁, H₂⟩, hsV⟩⟩,
refine ⟨V, H₁, _⟩,
cases V, dsimp at H₂, subst H₂, exact hsV },
{ refine is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds _ _,
{ rintros sU ⟨U, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩, subst H₂, exact U.property },
{ intros x sU hx hsU,
rcases @h (⟨sU, hsU⟩ : opens α) x hx with ⟨V, hV, H⟩,
exact ⟨V, ⟨V, hV, rfl⟩, H⟩ } }
end
lemma is_basis_iff_cover {B : set (opens α)} :
is_basis B ↔ ∀ U : opens α, ∃ Us ⊆ B, U = Sup Us :=
begin
split,
{ intros hB U,
refine ⟨{V : opens α | V ∈ B ∧ V ⊆ U}, λ U hU, hU.left, _⟩,
apply ext,
rw [Sup_s, hB.open_eq_sUnion' U.prop],
simp_rw [sUnion_image, sUnion_eq_bUnion, Union, supr_and, supr_image],
refl },
{ intro h,
rw is_basis_iff_nbhd,
intros U x hx,
rcases h U with ⟨Us, hUs, rfl⟩,
rcases mem_Sup.1 hx with ⟨U, Us, xU⟩,
exact ⟨U, hUs Us, xU, le_Sup Us⟩ }
end
/-- The preimage of an open set, as an open set. -/
def comap {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (V : opens β) : opens α :=
⟨f ⁻¹' V.1, V.2.preimage hf⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_id (U : opens α) : U.comap continuous_id = U := by { ext, refl }
lemma comap_mono {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) {V W : opens β} (hVW : V ⊆ W) :
V.comap hf ⊆ W.comap hf :=
λ _ h, hVW h
@[simp] lemma coe_comap {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (U : opens β) :
↑(U.comap hf) = f ⁻¹' U := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_val {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (U : opens β) :
(U.comap hf).1 = f ⁻¹' U := rfl
protected lemma comap_comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : continuous g) (hf : continuous f)
(U : opens γ) : U.comap (hg.comp hf) = (U.comap hg).comap hf :=
by { ext1, simp only [coe_comap, preimage_preimage] }
/-- A homeomorphism induces an equivalence on open sets, by taking comaps. -/
@[simp] protected def equiv (f : α ≃ₜ β) : opens α ≃ opens β :=
{ to_fun := opens.comap f.symm.continuous,
inv_fun := opens.comap f.continuous,
left_inv := by { intro U, ext1,
simp only [coe_comap, ← preimage_comp, f.symm_comp_self, preimage_id] },
right_inv := by { intro U, ext1,
simp only [coe_comap, ← preimage_comp, f.self_comp_symm, preimage_id] } }
end opens
/-- The open neighborhoods of a point. See also `opens` or `nhds`. -/
def open_nhds_of (x : α) : Type* := { s : set α // is_open s ∧ x ∈ s }
instance open_nhds_of.inhabited {α : Type*} [topological_space α] (x : α) :
inhabited (open_nhds_of x) := ⟨⟨set.univ, is_open_univ, set.mem_univ _⟩⟩
end topological_space
|
045a1045d826c53413025f708f4b08e4750a524c | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/linear_algebra/special_linear_group.lean | cc49bd53c55672b2b568fa2c862f04381f21ab5f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,779 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Anne Baanen.
The Special Linear group $SL(n, R)$
-/
import linear_algebra.basic
import linear_algebra.matrix
import linear_algebra.nonsingular_inverse
import tactic.norm_cast
/-!
# The Special Linear group $SL(n, R)$
This file defines the elements of the Special Linear group `special_linear_group n R`,
also written `SL(n, R)` or `SLₙ(R)`, consisting of all `n` by `n` `R`-matrices with
determinant `1`. In addition, we define the group structure on `special_linear_group n R`
and the embedding into the general linear group `general_linear_group R (n → R)`
(i.e. `GL(n, R)` or `GLₙ(R)`).
## Main definitions
* `matrix.special_linear_group` is the type of matrices with determinant 1
* `matrix.special_linear_group.group` gives the group structure (under multiplication)
* `matrix.special_linear_group.embedding_GL` is the embedding `SLₙ(R) → GLₙ(R)`
## Implementation notes
The inverse operation in the `special_linear_group` is defined to be the adjugate
matrix, so that `special_linear_group n R` has a group structure for all `comm_ring R`.
We define the elements of `special_linear_group` to be matrices, since we need to
compute their determinant. This is in contrast with `general_linear_group R M`,
which consists of invertible `R`-linear maps on `M`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_linear_group
## Tags
matrix group, group, matrix inverse
-/
namespace matrix
universes u v
open_locale matrix
open linear_map
set_option class.instance_max_depth 60
section
variables (n : Type u) [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] (R : Type v) [comm_ring R]
/-- `special_linear_group n R` is the group of `n` by `n` `R`-matrices with determinant equal to 1. -/
def special_linear_group := { A : matrix n n R // A.det = 1 }
end
namespace special_linear_group
variables {n : Type u} [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] {R : Type v} [comm_ring R]
instance coe_matrix : has_coe (special_linear_group n R) (matrix n n R) :=
⟨λ A, A.val⟩
instance coe_fun : has_coe_to_fun (special_linear_group n R) :=
{ F := λ _, n → n → R,
coe := λ A, A.val }
/--
`to_lin A` is matrix multiplication of vectors by `A`, as a linear map.
After the group structure on `special_linear_group n R` is defined,
we show in `to_linear_equiv` that this gives a linear equivalence.
-/
def to_lin (A : special_linear_group n R) := matrix.to_lin A
lemma ext_iff (A B : special_linear_group n R) : A = B ↔ (∀ i j, A i j = B i j) :=
iff.trans subtype.ext ⟨(λ h i j, congr_fun (congr_fun h i) j), matrix.ext⟩
@[ext] lemma ext (A B : special_linear_group n R) : (∀ i j, A i j = B i j) → A = B :=
(special_linear_group.ext_iff A B).mpr
instance has_inv : has_inv (special_linear_group n R) :=
⟨λ A, ⟨adjugate A, det_adjugate_eq_one A.2⟩⟩
instance has_mul : has_mul (special_linear_group n R) :=
⟨λ A B, ⟨A.1 ⬝ B.1, by erw [det_mul, A.2, B.2, one_mul]⟩⟩
instance has_one : has_one (special_linear_group n R) :=
⟨⟨1, det_one⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (special_linear_group n R) := ⟨1⟩
section coe_lemmas
variables (A B : special_linear_group n R)
@[simp] lemma inv_val : ↑(A⁻¹) = adjugate A := rfl
@[simp] lemma inv_apply : ⇑(A⁻¹) = adjugate A := rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_val : ↑(A * B) = A ⬝ B := rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_apply : ⇑(A * B) = (A ⬝ B) := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_val : ↑(1 : special_linear_group n R) = (1 : matrix n n R) := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_apply : ⇑(1 : special_linear_group n R) = (1 : matrix n n R) := rfl
@[simp] lemma det_coe_matrix : det A = 1 := A.2
lemma det_coe_fun : det ⇑A = 1 := A.2
@[simp] lemma to_lin_mul : to_lin (A * B) = (to_lin A).comp (to_lin B) := matrix.mul_to_lin A B
@[simp] lemma to_lin_one : to_lin (1 : special_linear_group n R) = linear_map.id := matrix.to_lin_one
end coe_lemmas
instance group : group (special_linear_group n R) :=
{ mul_assoc := λ A B C, by { ext, simp [matrix.mul_assoc] },
one_mul := λ A, by { ext, simp },
mul_one := λ A, by { ext, simp },
mul_left_inv := λ A, by { ext, simp [adjugate_mul] },
..special_linear_group.has_mul,
..special_linear_group.has_one,
..special_linear_group.has_inv }
/-- `to_linear_equiv A` is matrix multiplication of vectors by `A`, as a linear equivalence. -/
def to_linear_equiv (A : special_linear_group n R) : (n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) :=
{ inv_fun := A⁻¹.to_lin,
left_inv := λ x, calc
A⁻¹.to_lin.comp A.to_lin x
= (A⁻¹ * A).to_lin x : by rw [←to_lin_mul]
... = x : by rw [mul_left_inv, to_lin_one, id_apply],
right_inv := λ x, calc
A.to_lin.comp A⁻¹.to_lin x
= (A * A⁻¹).to_lin x : by rw [←to_lin_mul]
... = x : by rw [mul_right_inv, to_lin_one, id_apply],
..matrix.to_lin A }
/-- `to_GL` is the map from the special linear group to the general linear group -/
def to_GL (A : special_linear_group n R) : general_linear_group R (n → R) :=
general_linear_group.of_linear_equiv (to_linear_equiv A)
lemma coe_to_GL (A : special_linear_group n R) :
(@coe (units _) _ _ (to_GL A)) = A.to_lin :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma to_GL_one : to_GL (1 : special_linear_group n R) = 1 :=
by { ext v i, rw [coe_to_GL, to_lin_one], refl }
@[simp]
lemma to_GL_mul (A B : special_linear_group n R) :
to_GL (A * B) = to_GL A * to_GL B :=
by { ext v i, rw [coe_to_GL, to_lin_mul], refl }
/-- `special_linear_group.embedding_GL` is the embedding from `special_linear_group n R`
to `general_linear_group n R`. -/
def embedding_GL : (special_linear_group n R) →* (general_linear_group R (n → R)) :=
⟨λ A, to_GL A, by simp, by simp⟩
end special_linear_group
end matrix
|
92c919b814128e9bc3297089702d9dd0be568912 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/meta/congr_tactic.lean | 640720d605bed72de5f0cc7f25270c521a3be87d | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 391 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Daniel Selsam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Daniel Selsam
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.tactic
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.congr_lemma
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.relation_tactics
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.function
namespace Mathlib
namespace tactic
|
a51b1c22a534df52f2d7e3844982404014f2a81a | 7a51de2540dffbb2071672b4c6ace23ebf73b000 | /src/matroid.lean | d183b730709bc0ce4a2ed3750cdd1d84144eaa39 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bryangingechen/lean-matroids | 112b3839ca8d067d13d2b9bc6c392b680968d5e8 | 37c2964208f5a0532ef0a3e525ace06d4d7bc156 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,161,348,754 | 1,575,521,642,000 | 1,575,521,642,000 | 149,715,612 | 4 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,608,525,997,000 | 1,537,508,725,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 57,693 | lean | /-
Matroids, after Chapter 1 of Oxley, Matroid Theory, 1992.
-/
import data.finset tactic.wlog data.equiv.list tactic.find
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [decidable_eq α]
namespace finset
/- For mathlib? -/
lemma inter_of_subset {A B : finset α} (h : A ⊆ B) : A ∩ B = A :=
lattice.inf_of_le_left h
lemma subset_iff_sdiff_eq_empty {x y : finset α} : x ⊆ y ↔ x \ y = ∅ :=
by simp only [sdiff_eq_filter, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, subset_iff, not_and,
not_not, finset.mem_filter]
lemma empty_sdiff (E : finset α): E \ ∅ = E :=
by simp only [ext, finset.not_mem_empty, and_true, iff_self, finset.mem_sdiff,
not_false_iff, forall_true_iff]
lemma sdiff_subset (A B : finset α): A \ B ⊆ A :=
(empty_sdiff A).subst $ sdiff_subset_sdiff (subset.refl A) $ empty_subset B
lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_inter (A B : finset α) : A \ B = A \ (A ∩ B) :=
by { simp only [ext, not_and, mem_sdiff, mem_inter],
exact λ a, iff.intro (λ h, ⟨h.1, λ x, h.2⟩) (λ h, ⟨h.1, h.2 h.1⟩) }
lemma card_eq_inter_sdiff (A B : finset α) : card A = card (A ∩ B) + card (A \ B) :=
begin
have hA : A \ B ∪ A ∩ B = A := by { simp only [ext, mem_union, union_comm, mem_sdiff, mem_inter],
exact λ a, iff.intro (λ ha, or.elim ha (λ H, H.1) (λ H, H.1))
(by { intro ha, by_cases h : a ∈ B, { exact or.inl ⟨ha, h⟩ }, { exact or.inr ⟨ha, h⟩ } }) },
have : disjoint (A \ B) (A ∩ B) := by simp only [disjoint, empty_subset, inf_eq_inter,
inter_empty, sdiff_inter_self, inter_left_comm, le_iff_subset],
replace this := card_disjoint_union this, rwa [hA, add_comm] at this
end
lemma card_sdiff_eq (A B : finset α) : card (A \ B) = card A - card (A ∩ B) :=
(nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add $ card_eq_inter_sdiff A B).symm
lemma card_union_inter (A B : finset α) : card A + card B = card (A ∪ B) + card (A ∩ B) :=
begin
have hBA : card B = card (B \ A) + card (A ∩ B) := inter_comm B A ▸
(add_comm (card (B ∩ A)) (card (B \ A))) ▸ (card_eq_inter_sdiff B A),
have Hdis : disjoint A (B \ A) := by simp only [disjoint, empty_subset, inf_eq_inter,
inter_sdiff_self, le_iff_subset],
have H : card A + card (B \ A) = card (A ∪ B) :=
(congr_arg card $ union_sdiff_self_eq_union.symm).substr (card_disjoint_union Hdis).symm,
calc
card A + card B = card A + card (B \ A) + card (A ∩ B) : by rw [add_assoc, hBA]
... = card (A ∪ B) + card (A ∩ B) : by rw H
end
/- proof by Kenny Lau https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/subject/choosing.20from.20difference.20of.20finsets/near/133624012 -/
lemma exists_sdiff_of_card_lt {x y : finset α} (hcard : card x < card y) : ∃ e : α, e ∈ y \ x :=
suffices ∃ e ∈ y, e ∉ x, by simpa only [exists_prop, finset.mem_sdiff],
by_contradiction $ λ H, not_le_of_lt hcard $ card_le_of_subset $ by simpa only [not_exists,
exists_prop, not_and, not_not] using H
/- proof by chris hughes
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/subject/maximal.20finset.20in.20finset.20of.20finsets/near/133905271 -/
lemma max_fun_of_ne_empty {F : finset β} (func : β → ℕ) (h : F ≠ ∅) :
∃ x ∈ F, ∀ g ∈ F, func g ≤ func x :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (max_of_ne_empty (mt image_eq_empty.1 h) : ∃ a, a ∈ finset.max (F.image func)) in
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := mem_image.1 (mem_of_max hn) in
⟨x, hx₁, hx₂.symm ▸ λ g hg, le_max_of_mem (mem_image.2 ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩) hn⟩
lemma min_fun_of_ne_empty {F : finset β} (func : β → ℕ) (h : F ≠ ∅) :
∃ x ∈ F, ∀ g ∈ F, func x ≤ func g :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (min_of_ne_empty $ mt image_eq_empty.1 h : ∃ a, a ∈ finset.min (F.image func)) in
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := mem_image.1 (mem_of_min hn) in
⟨x, hx₁, hx₂.symm ▸ λ g hg, min_le_of_mem (mem_image.2 ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩) hn⟩
section inst
variables {F : finset α} {Q : finset α → Prop} [decidable_pred Q] {P : α → Prop} [decidable_pred P]
instance decidable_not_forall (c₁ : finset (finset α)) :
decidable (∃ x : finset α, ¬(x ∈ c₁ → ¬Q x)) :=
decidable_of_iff (∃ x ∈ c₁, Q x) $ by simp only [exists_prop, not_forall_not]
instance decidable_exists_and_mem : decidable (∃ e, e ∈ F ∧ P e) :=
decidable_of_iff (∃ e ∈ F, P e) $ by simp only [exists_prop, not_forall_not]
end inst
end finset
open finset
-- § 1.1
namespace matroid
variables {E : finset α}
/-- `indep E` is the type of matroids (encoded as systems of independent sets) with ground set `E` :
`finset α` -/
structure indep (E : finset α) :=
(indep : finset (finset α))
(indep_subset_powerset_ground : indep ⊆ powerset E)
-- (I1)
(empty_mem_indep : ∅ ∈ indep)
-- (I2)
(indep_of_subset_indep {x y} (hx : x ∈ indep) (hyx : y ⊆ x) : y ∈ indep)
-- (I3)
(indep_exch {x y} (hx : x ∈ indep) (hy : y ∈ indep) (hcard : card x < card y)
: ∃ e, e ∈ y \ x ∧ insert e x ∈ indep)
--attribute [class] indep
instance indep_repr [has_repr α] (E : finset α) : has_repr (indep E) :=
⟨λ m, has_repr.repr m.indep⟩
theorem eq_of_indep_eq : ∀ {M₁ M₂ : indep E}, M₁.1 = M₂.1 → M₁ = M₂
| ⟨I₁, p₁, q₁, r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨I₂, p₂, q₂, r₂, s₂⟩ h :=
by simpa only []
/-- A circuit of a matroid is a minimal dependent subset of the ground set -/
def is_circuit (x : finset α) (m : indep E) : Prop :=
x ∉ m.indep ∧ ∀ y, y ⊂ x → y ∈ m.indep
/-- proof by Mario Carneiro https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/subject/finsets.2C.20decidable_mem.2C.20and.20filter/near/133708937 -/
instance decidable_circuit (x : finset α) (m : indep E) : decidable (is_circuit x m) :=
decidable_of_iff (x ∉ m.indep ∧ ∀ y ∈ (powerset x).erase x, y ∈ m.indep)
begin
simp only [is_circuit, has_ssubset.ssubset, mem_powerset, and_imp, mem_erase],
refine and_congr iff.rfl (forall_congr $ λ y, _),
refine ⟨λ H h₁ h₂, H (mt _ h₂) h₁, λ H h₁ h₂, H h₂ $ mt _ h₁⟩,
{ rintro rfl, refl }, { exact subset.antisymm h₂ }
end
instance decidable_circuit_subset (x : finset α) (m : indep E) :
decidable (∃ (y : finset α) (H : y ⊆ x), is_circuit y m) :=
decidable_of_iff (∃ (y : finset α) (H : y ∈ powerset x), is_circuit y m) $
by simp only [exists_prop, mem_powerset]
/- should I make this definition reducible? I don't know when to use attributes... -/
def circuits_circ_of_indep (m : indep E) : finset (finset α) :=
(powerset E).filter (λ S, is_circuit S m)
lemma C2_of_indep (m : indep E) (x y : finset α) (hx : x ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m)
(hy : y ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : x = y :=
begin
simp only [circuits_circ_of_indep, is_circuit, mem_filter] at *,
have hnxy : ¬x ⊂ y := λ h, hx.2.1 $ hy.2.2 x h,
rw ←lt_iff_ssubset at hnxy, rw [←le_iff_subset, le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hxy,
exact or.elim hxy id (λ hxy2, false.elim $ hnxy hxy2)
end
theorem dep_iff_circuit_subset {x : finset α} (m : indep E) :
x ⊆ E → (x ∉ m.indep ↔ ∃ y ⊆ x, is_circuit y m) :=
λ hxE, iff.intro (λ hxd, exists.elim (min_fun_of_ne_empty card (ne_empty_of_mem $
mem_filter.mpr ⟨mem_powerset.mpr $ subset.refl x, hxd⟩)) $
λ a ha, exists.elim ha $
λ ha2 hamin, exists.intro a $ have hax : a ⊆ x := mem_powerset.mp (mem_filter.mp ha2).1,
exists.intro hax $ by { unfold is_circuit,
exact ⟨(mem_filter.mp ha2).2, by { intros y hy, by_contra h,
exact not_le_of_lt (card_lt_card hy) (hamin y $ mem_filter.mpr ⟨mem_powerset.mpr $
subset.trans (le_of_lt $ lt_iff_ssubset.mpr hy) hax, h⟩) }⟩ }) $
λ H, exists.elim H $ λ a ha, exists.elim ha $
by { intros hax hacirc hxi, unfold is_circuit at hacirc,
exact hacirc.1 (m.indep_of_subset_indep hxi hax) }
/-- Lemma 1.1.3 -/
lemma C3_of_indep (m : indep E) (x y : finset α) (e : α) (hx : x ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m)
(hy : y ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m) (hxny : x ≠ y) (he : e ∈ x ∩ y) :
∃ z, z ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m ∧ z ⊆ erase (x ∪ y) e :=
have hxmy : x \ y ≠ ∅ := mt subset_iff_sdiff_eq_empty.mpr $ mt (C2_of_indep m x y hx hy) hxny,
exists.elim (exists_mem_of_ne_empty hxmy) $
by { clear hxny hxmy,
intros a ha, simp only [circuits_circ_of_indep, mem_powerset, mem_filter, mem_sdiff, mem_inter]
at ha hx hy he,
have hxai : erase x a ∈ m.indep := by { unfold is_circuit at hx,
exact hx.2.2 (erase x a) (erase_ssubset ha.1) },
let F := (powerset (x ∪ y)).filter (λ S, erase x a ⊆ S ∧ S ∈ m.indep),
have hxaF : erase x a ∈ F := mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_powerset.mpr $ subset.trans (erase_subset a x) $
@subset_union_left _ _ x y, ⟨subset.refl _, hxai⟩⟩, clear hxai,
exact exists.elim (max_fun_of_ne_empty card $ ne_empty_of_mem hxaF)
(λ I hEI2, exists.elim hEI2 $ by { clear hxaF hEI2,
exact λ hIF hI,
have hIFindep : I ∈ m.indep := (mem_filter.mp hIF).2.2,
have hIdep : _ → I ∉ m.indep := (dep_iff_circuit_subset m $ mem_powerset.1 $
m.indep_subset_powerset_ground hIFindep).2,
have hIFxa : erase x a ⊆ I := (mem_filter.mp hIF).2.1,
have hIxuy : I ⊆ x ∪ y := mem_powerset.mp (mem_filter.mp hIF).1,
have haniI : a ∉ I :=
λ H, have hxI : x ⊆ I := (insert_erase ha.1) ▸ insert_subset.mpr ⟨H, hIFxa⟩,
have ∃ A ⊆ I, is_circuit A m := exists.intro x (exists.intro hxI hx.2),
hIdep this hIFindep,
have hEg : ∃ g ∈ y, g ∉ I :=
by { have hIdep2 := mt hIdep, simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_not]
at hIdep2,
have hyI0 := mt (hIdep2 hIFindep y), simp only [not_not] at hyI0,
have hYI : ¬y ⊆ I := hyI0 hy.2,
have this := exists_mem_of_ne_empty (mt subset_iff_sdiff_eq_empty.mpr hYI),
simp only [mem_sdiff] at this, simpa only [exists_prop] },
exists.elim hEg $ λ g hEg2, exists.elim hEg2 $ by { clear hEg hEg2 hIdep,
intros hgy hgnI,
have hga : g ≠ a := λ H, ha.2 (H ▸ hgy),
have hIag : I ⊆ erase (erase (x ∪ y) a) g :=
subset_iff.mpr (λ xx hxx, mem_erase.mpr ⟨λ hgg, hgnI $ hgg ▸ hxx,
mem_erase.mpr ⟨λ hgga, haniI $ hgga ▸ hxx, mem_of_subset hIxuy hxx⟩⟩),
have haxuy : a ∈ x ∪ y := mem_union_left y ha.1,
have hcardxye : card (erase (x ∪ y) a) = nat.pred (card (x ∪ y)) :=
card_erase_of_mem haxuy,
have hpcard : nat.pred (card (x ∪ y)) > 0 := by { rw ←hcardxye,
exact card_pos.mpr (ne_empty_of_mem $ mem_erase.mpr ⟨hga, mem_union_right x hgy⟩) },
have hcard : card I < card (erase (x ∪ y) e) :=
calc card I ≤ card (erase (erase (x ∪ y) a) g) : card_le_of_subset hIag
... = nat.pred (nat.pred (card (x ∪ y))) : by rw [card_erase_of_mem
(mem_erase.mpr ⟨hga, mem_union_right x hgy⟩), hcardxye]
... < card (erase (x ∪ y) e) :
by { rw [card_erase_of_mem (mem_union_left y he.1),
←nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hpcard], exact nat.lt_succ_self _ },
clear hga hIag haxuy hcardxye hpcard he,
by_contra h, simp only [circuits_circ_of_indep, mem_powerset, not_exists, and_imp,
mem_filter, not_and] at h,
have hinE : erase (x ∪ y) e ⊆ E :=
subset.trans (erase_subset e (x ∪ y)) (union_subset hx.1 hy.1),
have : (∀ x_1 : finset α, x_1 ⊆ erase (x ∪ y) e → ¬is_circuit x_1 m) :=
λ x1 hx1, (mt $ h x1 $ subset.trans hx1 hinE) $ not_not.mpr hx1,
have hindep := mt (dep_iff_circuit_subset m hinE).mp,
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_not] at hindep,
replace hindep : erase (x ∪ y) e ∈ m.indep := hindep this,
have hfinal := m.indep_exch hIFindep hindep hcard,
exact exists.elim hfinal (λ El ⟨hElxy, hElindep⟩,
have hElF : insert El I ∈ F := mem_filter.mpr ⟨mem_powerset.mpr
(insert_subset.mpr ⟨(mem_erase.mp (mem_sdiff.mp hElxy).1).2, hIxuy⟩),
⟨subset.trans hIFxa (subset_insert El I), hElindep⟩⟩,
have hcardEl : card I < card (insert El I) :=
by { rw card_insert_of_not_mem (mem_sdiff.mp hElxy).2,
exact lt_add_one (card I) },
not_lt.mpr (hI (insert El I) hElF) hcardEl) } }) }
structure circuits (E : finset α) :=
(circuits : finset (finset α))
(circuits_subset_powerset_ground : circuits ⊆ powerset E)
-- (C1)
(empty_not_mem_circuits : ∅ ∉ circuits)
-- (C2)
(circuits_eq_of_subset {x y} (hx : x ∈ circuits) (hy : y ∈ circuits) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : x = y)
-- (C3)
(circuit_elim {x y e} (hx : x ∈ circuits) (hy : y ∈ circuits) (hxy : x ≠ y) (he : e ∈ x ∩ y) :
∃ z, z ∈ circuits ∧ z ⊆ erase (x ∪ y) e)
--attribute [class] circuits
instance circuits_repr [has_repr α] (E : finset α) : has_repr (circuits E) :=
⟨λ c, has_repr.repr c.circuits⟩
theorem eq_of_circ_eq : ∀ {C₁ C₂ : circuits E}, C₁.1 = C₂.1 → C₁ = C₂
| ⟨c₁, p₁, q₁, r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨c₂, p₂, q₂, r₂, s₂⟩ h :=
by simpa only []
def circuits_of_indep (m : indep E) : circuits E :=
{ circuits := circuits_circ_of_indep m,
circuits_subset_powerset_ground := filter_subset _,
empty_not_mem_circuits :=
begin
simp only [circuits_circ_of_indep, is_circuit, mem_filter, not_and],
exact λ h h1, (h1 m.empty_mem_indep).elim
end,
circuits_eq_of_subset := C2_of_indep m,
circuit_elim := C3_of_indep m }
/- make reducible? -/
def indep_indep_of_circuits (C : circuits E) : finset (finset α) :=
(powerset E).filter (λ S, ∀ c ∈ C.circuits, ¬c ⊆ S)
/-- first part of Theorem 1.1.4 -/
lemma I2_of_circuits (C : circuits E) (x y : finset α) : x ∈ indep_indep_of_circuits C → y ⊆ x →
y ∈ indep_indep_of_circuits C :=
begin
simp only [indep_indep_of_circuits, mem_powerset, and_imp, mem_filter],
exact λ hxE hx hxy, ⟨subset.trans hxy hxE, λ c hc H, hx c hc $ subset.trans H hxy⟩
end
/-- second part of Theorem 1.1.4 -/
lemma I3_of_circuits (C : circuits E) (x y : finset α) (hx : x ∈ indep_indep_of_circuits C)
(hy : y ∈ indep_indep_of_circuits C) (hcardxy : card x < card y)
: ∃ e, e ∈ y \ x ∧ insert e x ∈ indep_indep_of_circuits C :=
begin
unfold indep_indep_of_circuits at ⊢,
simp only [indep_indep_of_circuits, mem_powerset, mem_filter] at hx hy,
by_contra h,
simp only [mem_powerset, not_exists, and_imp, mem_filter, not_and, mem_sdiff] at h,
let F := (powerset $ x ∪ y).filter (λ S, (∀ c ∈ C.circuits, ¬c ⊆ S) ∧ card x < card S),
have hyF : y ∈ F := mem_filter.mpr ⟨mem_powerset.mpr $ subset_union_right x y,
⟨hy.2, hcardxy⟩⟩,
exact exists.elim (min_fun_of_ne_empty (λ f, card (x \ f)) $ ne_empty_of_mem hyF)
(λ z Hz, exists.elim Hz $ by { clear hcardxy Hz hyF,
intros hz hminz,
have hzxuy : z ⊆ x ∪ y := mem_powerset.mp (mem_filter.mp hz).1,
replace hz := (mem_filter.mp hz).2,
exact exists.elim (exists_sdiff_of_card_lt hz.2)
(by { intros a ha, rw mem_sdiff at ha,
have hxsdiffz : x \ z ≠ ∅ :=
by { intro H,
have Hxsubz : x ⊆ z := subset_iff_sdiff_eq_empty.mpr H,
have hay : a ∈ y := or.elim (mem_union.mp $ mem_of_subset hzxuy ha.1)
(λ Hax, false.elim $ ha.2 Hax) id,
have haindep : insert a x ∈ indep_indep_of_circuits C := I2_of_circuits C z (insert a x)
(by { simp only [indep_indep_of_circuits, mem_powerset, mem_filter],
exact ⟨subset.trans hzxuy $ union_subset hx.1 hy.1, hz.1⟩ })
(insert_subset.mpr ⟨ha.1, Hxsubz⟩),
simp only [indep_indep_of_circuits, mem_powerset, mem_filter] at haindep,
exact h a hay ha.2 haindep.1 haindep.2 },
exact exists.elim (exists_mem_of_ne_empty hxsdiffz)
(by { clear h ha hxsdiffz,
intros e he, rw mem_sdiff at he,
let T : α → finset α := λ f, erase (insert e z) f,
have hTf1 : ∀ f, f ∈ z \ x → T f ⊆ x ∪ y :=
by { intros f hf, rw [mem_sdiff] at hf,
rw [subset_iff],
intros gg hgg, simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, ne.def] at hgg,
simp only [mem_union],
exact or.elim hgg.2 (λ gge, or.inl $ gge.symm ▸ he.1)
(λ ggz, mem_union.mp $ mem_of_subset hzxuy ggz) },
have hTf2 : ∀ f, f ∈ z \ x → card (x \ T f) < card (x \ z) :=
by { intros f hf, rw mem_sdiff at hf,
suffices H : x \ T f ⊂ x \ z, exact card_lt_card H,
by { simp only [ssubset_iff, exists_prop, mem_insert, not_forall_not, not_and,
mem_sdiff, mem_erase],
exact exists.intro e
⟨λ h_, ⟨λ hef, hf.2 $ hef ▸ he.1, or.inl rfl⟩,
by { rw [subset_iff],
intros gg hgg,
simp only [mem_insert, not_and, mem_sdiff, mem_erase, ne.def] at hgg,
have ggnef : gg ≠ f := λ ggef, or.elim hgg
(λ gge, (gge.symm ▸ he.2) $ ggef.substr hf.1) (λ H, (ggef.substr hf.2) H.1),
have he0 := mem_sdiff.mpr he,
exact or.elim hgg (λ gge, gge.symm ▸ he0)
(λ H, mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨H.1, λ ggz, (H.2 ggnef) $ or.inr ggz⟩) }⟩ } },
have hTfindep : ∀ f, f ∈ z \ x → T f ∉ indep_indep_of_circuits C :=
by { intros f hf,
simp only [indep_indep_of_circuits, mem_powerset, mem_filter, not_and],
intros hTfE H,
have HTf1 : T f ⊆ x ∪ y := hTf1 f hf,
have HTf2 : card (x \ T f) < card (x \ z) := hTf2 f hf,
rw mem_sdiff at hf,
have HTfcard : card z = card (T f) :=
by { simp only [card_erase_of_mem (mem_insert.mpr $ or.inr hf.1),
card_insert_of_not_mem he.2, mem_insert, card_insert_of_not_mem, nat.pred_succ] },
replace HTfcard : card x < card (T f) := HTfcard ▸ hz.2,
have : T f ∈ F := mem_filter.mpr ⟨mem_powerset.mpr HTf1, ⟨H, HTfcard⟩⟩,
exact not_lt.mpr (hminz (T f) this) HTf2 },
have hTfC : ∀ f, f ∈ z \ x → ∃ c ∈ C.circuits, c ⊆ T f :=
by { intros f hf,
have : T f ∉ indep_indep_of_circuits C := hTfindep f hf,
simp only [indep_indep_of_circuits, mem_powerset, mem_filter, not_and] at this,
have hfc := this (subset.trans (hTf1 f hf) $ union_subset hx.1 hy.1),
by_contra H, simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and] at H, contradiction },
exact exists.elim (exists_sdiff_of_card_lt hz.2) (λ g hg, exists.elim (hTfC g hg) $
λ Cg hCg, exists.elim hCg $
by { clear hCg hTf1 hTf2 hTfindep hg,
intros HCg1 HCg2,
have hCgsub : Cg ⊆ insert e z := subset.trans HCg2 (erase_subset g $ insert e z),
rw [subset_iff] at HCg2,
have HCgzx : Cg ∩ (z \ x) ≠ ∅ :=
λ H, suffices Cg ⊆ x, from hx.2 Cg HCg1 this,
suffices H1 : Cg ⊆ erase (insert e (x ∩ z)) g, from
suffices H2 : erase (insert e (x ∩ z)) g ⊆ x, from
subset.trans H1 H2,
show erase (insert e (x ∩ z)) g ⊆ x, by
{ rw [subset_iff],
intros gg hgg,
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, mem_inter] at hgg,
exact or.elim hgg.2 (λ gge, gge.symm ▸ he.1) (λ ggxggz, ggxggz.1) },
show Cg ⊆ erase (insert e (x ∩ z)) g, by
{ rw [subset_iff],
intros gg hgg,
replace HCg2 : gg ∈ T g := HCg2 hgg,
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, mem_inter] at HCg2 ⊢,
split,
{ exact HCg2.1 },
{ rw eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem at H,
replace H : gg ∉ Cg ∩ (z \ x) := H gg,
simp only [not_and, mem_sdiff, not_not, mem_inter] at H,
exact or.elim HCg2.2 (λ gge, or.inl gge) (λ ggz, or.inr ⟨H hgg ggz, ggz⟩) } },
clear HCg2,
exact exists.elim (exists_mem_of_ne_empty HCgzx)
(by { intros h0 hh0, rw [mem_inter] at hh0,
exact exists.elim (hTfC h0 hh0.2)
(λ Ch0 HCh0, exists.elim HCh0 $ λ hCh0circ hCh0T,
have hCgneCh0 : Cg ≠ Ch0 :=
λ H, have hh0Ch0 : h0 ∉ Ch0 := λ HH, (mem_erase.mp $
mem_of_subset hCh0T HH).1 rfl, (H.symm ▸ hh0Ch0) hh0.1,
have hCh0sub : Ch0 ⊆ insert e z :=
subset.trans hCh0T (erase_subset h0 $ insert e z),
have heCgCh0 : e ∈ Cg ∩ Ch0 :=
by { rw mem_inter, split,
{ by_contra heCg, have hCgz : Cg ⊆ z :=
(erase_eq_of_not_mem heCg) ▸ (subset_insert_iff.mp hCgsub),
exact hz.1 Cg HCg1 hCgz },
{ by_contra heCh0, have hCh0z : Ch0 ⊆ z :=
(erase_eq_of_not_mem heCh0) ▸ (subset_insert_iff.1 hCh0sub),
exact hz.1 Ch0 hCh0circ hCh0z } },
exists.elim (C.circuit_elim HCg1 hCh0circ hCgneCh0 heCgCh0) $
λ CC ⟨hCCcirc, hCCCguCh0⟩,
have hCCz : CC ⊆ z :=
by { rw [subset_iff],
intros t ht,
rw [subset_iff] at hCCCguCh0,
have htCguCh0 := hCCCguCh0 ht,
simp only [mem_union, mem_erase] at htCguCh0,
rw [subset_iff] at hCgsub hCh0sub,
have orCg : t ∈ Cg → t ∈ z :=
λ htCg, or.elim (mem_insert.mp $ hCgsub htCg)
(λ H, false.elim $ htCguCh0.1 H) id,
have orCh0 : t ∈ Ch0 → t ∈ z :=
λ htCh0, or.elim (mem_insert.mp $ hCh0sub htCh0)
(λ H, false.elim $ htCguCh0.1 H) id,
exact or.elim htCguCh0.2 orCg orCh0 },
hz.1 CC hCCcirc hCCz) }) }) }) }) })
end
def indep_of_circuits (C : circuits E) : indep E :=
⟨indep_indep_of_circuits C,
by simp only [indep_indep_of_circuits, filter_subset],
mem_filter.mpr
⟨empty_mem_powerset E, λ c hc H, C.empty_not_mem_circuits $ (subset_empty.mp H) ▸ hc⟩,
I2_of_circuits C,
I3_of_circuits C⟩
instance circ_indep : has_coe (circuits E) (indep E) := ⟨indep_of_circuits⟩
instance indep_circ : has_coe (indep E) (circuits E) := ⟨circuits_of_indep⟩
/-- third part of Theorem 1.1.4 -/
theorem circ_indep_circ : ∀ C : circuits E, C = circuits_of_indep (indep_of_circuits C)
| ⟨c₁, p₁, q₁, r₁, s₁⟩ :=
by { simp only [indep_of_circuits, circuits_of_indep, indep_indep_of_circuits,
circuits_circ_of_indep, is_circuit, ext, mem_filter, mem_powerset, and_imp, not_and],
exact λ c, iff.intro
(λ hc : c ∈ c₁, have ce : c ⊆ E := mem_powerset.mp (mem_of_subset p₁ hc),
⟨ce, ⟨λ _ H, (H c hc) $ subset.refl c, λ f hf,
⟨subset.trans (le_of_lt $ lt_iff_ssubset.mpr hf) ce,
λ g hg H, have Hc : g < c := lt_of_le_of_lt (le_iff_subset.mpr H) $ lt_iff_ssubset.mpr hf,
have r : g = c := r₁ hg hc $ le_of_lt Hc, (not_le_of_lt Hc) $ le_of_eq r.symm⟩⟩⟩) $
λ hc, have ∃ c_1 ∈ c₁, c_1 ⊆ c := by { have := not_forall.mp (hc.2.1 hc.1),
simpa only [exists_prop, not_forall_not] },
exists.elim this $ λ c' H, exists.elim H $ by { intros hc' hcc',
by_cases h : c = c', { exact h.symm ▸ hc' },
{ have hc'lt : c' ⊂ c := lt_of_le_of_ne (le_iff_subset.mpr hcc') (ne.symm h),
have : c' ∉ c₁ := mt ((hc.2.2 c' hc'lt).2 c') (not_not.mpr $ subset.refl c'),
exact false.elim (this hc') } } }
theorem indep_circ_indep (M : indep E) : M = indep_of_circuits (circuits_of_indep M) :=
suffices M.indep = (indep_of_circuits $ circuits_of_indep M).indep, from eq_of_indep_eq this,
begin
simp only [circuits_of_indep, indep_of_circuits, circuits_circ_of_indep, indep_indep_of_circuits,
ext, mem_powerset, and_imp, mem_filter],
intro I,
have hI : I ∈ M.indep → I ⊆ E := λ H, mem_powerset.mp $
mem_of_subset (M.indep_subset_powerset_ground) H,
rw [←and_iff_right_of_imp hI, and_congr_right],
intro hIE, have := not_iff_not_of_iff (dep_iff_circuit_subset M hIE),
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_not] at this,
rw [this, forall_congr],
exact λ a, ⟨λ h h₁ h₂ h₃, (h h₃) h₂, λ h h₁ h₂, h (subset.trans h₁ hIE) h₂ h₁⟩
end
/-- Proposition 1.1.6 -/
theorem existsu_circuit_of_dep_of_insert_indep {I : finset α} {e : α} {m : indep E}
(hI : I ∈ m.indep) (he : e ∈ E) (hIe : insert e I ∉ m.indep) :
∃ c, c ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m ∧ c ⊆ insert e I ∧ e ∈ c ∧
∀ c' ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m, c' ⊆ insert e I ∧ e ∈ c → c' = c :=
by { simp only [circuits_circ_of_indep, mem_powerset, and_imp, mem_filter],
exact have hIE : I ⊆ E, from mem_powerset.mp (mem_of_subset m.indep_subset_powerset_ground hI),
have hIeE : insert e I ⊆ E, from insert_subset.mpr ⟨he, hIE⟩,
have hc : _, from (dep_iff_circuit_subset m hIeE).mp hIe,
exists.elim hc $ λ c hEc, exists.elim hEc $ λ hceI hccirc,
have hcE : c ⊆ E := subset.trans hceI hIeE,
have hecirc : ∀ c' ⊆ insert e I, is_circuit c' m → e ∈ c' :=
by { intros c' hc'eI hc'circ,
have h₁ := subset_insert_iff.mp hc'eI,
by_contra h,
have h₂ := (erase_eq_of_not_mem h).symm,
have h₃ : c' ⊆ I := calc
c' = erase c' e : h₂
... ⊆ I : h₁,
exact (dep_iff_circuit_subset m hIE).mpr (exists.intro c' $ exists.intro h₃ $ hc'circ) hI },
have hec : e ∈ c := hecirc c hceI hccirc,
exists.intro c $ by { exact ⟨⟨hcE, hccirc⟩, ⟨hceI,⟨hec, by { intros c' hc'E hc'circ hc'eI _,
have hec' : e ∈ c' := hecirc c' hc'eI hc'circ,
have hcuc'eI : erase (c ∪ c') e ⊆ I := by {
simp only [subset_iff, and_imp, mem_union, mem_insert, mem_erase, ne.def] at hceI hc'eI ⊢,
exact λ a hane ha, or.elim ha (λ H, or.elim (hceI H) (λ H, false.elim $ hane H) id)
(λ H, or.elim (hc'eI H) (λ H, false.elim $ hane H) id) },
have : erase (c ∪ c') e ∈ m.indep := m.indep_of_subset_indep hI hcuc'eI,
by_contra h,
have C3 := C3_of_indep m c c' e,
simp only [circuits_circ_of_indep, mem_powerset, and_imp,
filter_congr_decidable, mem_filter, mem_inter] at C3,
exact exists.elim (C3 hcE hccirc hc'E hc'circ (ne.symm h) hec hec')
(λ c₀ hc₀, (dep_iff_circuit_subset m hIE).mpr (exists.intro c₀ $ exists.intro
(subset.trans hc₀.2 hcuc'eI) hc₀.1.2) hI) }⟩⟩⟩ } }
section encodable
variable [encodable α]
def circuit_of_dep_of_insert_indep {I : finset α} {e : α} {m : indep E}
(hI : I ∈ m.indep) (he : e ∈ E) (hIe : insert e I ∉ m.indep) : finset α :=
encodable.choose (existsu_circuit_of_dep_of_insert_indep hI he hIe)
local notation `cdii` := circuit_of_dep_of_insert_indep
def circuit_of_dep_of_insert_indep_spec {I : finset α} {e : α} {m : indep E}
(hI : I ∈ m.indep) (he : e ∈ E) (hIe : insert e I ∉ m.indep) :
cdii hI he hIe ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m ∧ cdii hI he hIe ⊆ insert e I ∧
e ∈ cdii hI he hIe ∧ ∀ (c' : finset α), c' ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m →
c' ⊆ insert e I ∧ e ∈ cdii hI he hIe → c' = cdii hI he hIe :=
encodable.choose_spec (existsu_circuit_of_dep_of_insert_indep hI he hIe)
end encodable
-- § 1.2
def is_basis (x : finset α) (m : indep E) : Prop :=
x ∈ m.indep ∧ (∀ y ⊆ E, x ⊂ y → y ∉ m.indep)
instance decidable_basis (x : finset α) (m : indep E) : decidable (is_basis x m) :=
decidable_of_iff (x ∈ m.indep ∧ (∀ y ∈ powerset E, x ⊂ y → y ∉ m.indep)) $
by simp only [is_basis, iff_self, finset.mem_powerset]
/-- Lemma 1.2.1 -/
theorem bases_of_indep_card_eq {x y : finset α} {m : indep E} : is_basis x m → is_basis y m →
card x = card y :=
begin
intros hx hy,
by_contra heq,
wlog h : card x < card y using [x y, y x],
exact lt_or_gt_of_ne heq,
unfold is_basis at hx hy,
exact exists.elim (m.indep_exch hx.1 hy.1 h) (λ e ⟨he1, he2⟩,
have hins : insert e x ⊆ E := mem_powerset.mp
(mem_of_subset (m.indep_subset_powerset_ground) he2),
have hememx : e ∉ x := (mem_sdiff.mp he1).2,
(hx.2 (insert e x) hins $ ssubset_insert hememx) he2)
end
theorem exists_basis_containing_indep {I : finset α} {m : indep E} (h : I ∈ m.indep) :
∃ B : finset α, I ⊆ B ∧ is_basis B m :=
let F := (m.indep).filter (λ a, I ⊆ a) in
have FI : I ∈ F := mem_filter.mpr ⟨h, subset.refl I⟩,
exists.elim (max_fun_of_ne_empty card $ ne_empty_of_mem FI) $
λ B HB, exists.elim HB $ by { clear HB, intros HBF Hg, rw mem_filter at HBF,
have hBB : is_basis B m := ⟨HBF.1, λ y hy hBy hyI,
have hxsy : I ⊆ y := le_of_lt $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_iff_subset.mpr HBF.2) $
lt_iff_ssubset.mpr hBy,
have hyF : y ∈ F := mem_filter.mpr ⟨hyI, hxsy⟩,
lt_irrefl (card B) $ lt_of_lt_of_le (card_lt_card hBy) $ Hg y hyF⟩,
exact exists.intro B ⟨HBF.2, hBB⟩ }
section encodable
def basis_containing_indep [encodable α] {I : finset α} {m : indep E} (h : I ∈ m.indep) :
finset α :=
encodable.choose $ exists_basis_containing_indep h
local notation `bci` := basis_containing_indep
def basis_containing_indep_spec [encodable α] {I : finset α} {m : indep E} (h : I ∈ m.indep) :
I ⊆ bci h ∧ is_basis (bci h) m :=
encodable.choose_spec $ exists_basis_containing_indep h
end encodable
theorem dep_of_card_gt_card_basis {x B : finset α} {m : indep E} (hB : is_basis B m)
(hcard : card B < card x) : x ∉ m.indep :=
λ hxI, exists.elim (exists_basis_containing_indep hxI) $ λ B' hB',
ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hcard $ card_le_of_subset hB'.1) $ bases_of_indep_card_eq hB hB'.2
theorem card_of_indep_le_card_basis {x B : finset α} {m : indep E} (hx : x ∈ m.indep)
(hB : is_basis B m) : card x ≤ card B :=
by { by_contra h, exact dep_of_card_gt_card_basis hB (lt_of_not_ge h) hx }
structure bases (E : finset α) :=
(bases : finset (finset α))
(bases_subset_powerset_ground : bases ⊆ powerset E)
-- (B1)
(bases_not_empty : bases ≠ ∅)
-- (B2)
(basis_exch {x y e} (hx : x ∈ bases) (hy : y ∈ bases) (he : e ∈ x \ y)
: ∃ a, a ∈ y \ x ∧ insert a (erase x e) ∈ bases)
--attribute [class] bases
instance bases_repr [has_repr α] (E : finset α) : has_repr (bases E) :=
⟨λ b, has_repr.repr b.bases⟩
theorem eq_of_base_eq : ∀ {B₁ B₂ : bases E}, B₁.1 = B₂.1 → B₁ = B₂
| ⟨b₁, p₁, q₁, r₁⟩ ⟨b₂, p₂, q₂, r₂⟩ h :=
by simpa only []
def bases_bases_of_indep (m : indep E) : finset (finset α) :=
(powerset E).filter (λ S, is_basis S m)
lemma B1_of_indep (m : indep E) : bases_bases_of_indep m ≠ ∅ :=
by { simp only [is_basis, bases_bases_of_indep, ext, ne.def, mem_filter, mem_powerset,
not_mem_empty, not_and, iff_false],
exact λ h, exists.elim (max_fun_of_ne_empty card $ ne_empty_of_mem m.empty_mem_indep)
(λ a ha, exists.elim ha $ λ ha1 hg, (h a (mem_powerset.mp $
mem_of_subset m.indep_subset_powerset_ground ha1)
ha1) $ λ F _ Fcontainsa Findep, not_le_of_lt (card_lt_card Fcontainsa) $ hg F Findep) }
/- Lemma 1.2.2 -/
lemma B2_of_indep (m : indep E) : ∀ (x y : finset α) (e : α), x ∈ bases_bases_of_indep m →
y ∈ bases_bases_of_indep m → e ∈ x \ y →
∃ a, a ∈ y \ x ∧ insert a (erase x e) ∈ bases_bases_of_indep m :=
by { simp only [is_basis, bases_bases_of_indep, filter_and, mem_filter, mem_sdiff,
mem_powerset, and_imp],
exact λ x y e hxE hxI hx hyE hyI hy hex hey,
have hxr : erase x e ∈ m.indep := m.indep_of_subset_indep hxI $ erase_subset e x,
have hxB : is_basis x m := ⟨hxI, hx⟩, have hyB : is_basis y m := ⟨hyI, hy⟩,
have hcard : card (erase x e) < card y := calc
card (erase x e) < card x : card_lt_card $ erase_ssubset hex
... = card y : bases_of_indep_card_eq hxB hyB,
exists.elim (m.indep_exch hxr hyI hcard) $
by { clear hxr hyI hcard hyB, intros a ha,
have ha1 := mem_sdiff.mp ha.1,
have hae : a ≠ e := λ hae, hey $ hae ▸ ha1.1,
have hax : a ∉ x := by { simp only [not_and, mem_erase, ne.def] at ha1, exact ha1.2 hae },
have hcx : card x > 0 := card_pos.mpr (ne_empty_of_mem hex),
have hayycard : card (insert a $ erase x e) = card x := calc
card (insert a $ erase x e) = nat.pred (card x) + 1 : by rw [card_insert_of_not_mem ha1.2,
card_erase_of_mem hex]
... = card x : nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hcx,
exact exists.intro a ⟨⟨ha1.1, hax⟩, mem_powerset.mp $
mem_of_subset m.indep_subset_powerset_ground ha.2, ha.2,
λ _ _ hayy, dep_of_card_gt_card_basis hxB $ hayycard ▸ (card_lt_card hayy)⟩ } }
def bases_of_indep (m : indep E) : bases E :=
⟨bases_bases_of_indep m,
filter_subset _,
B1_of_indep m,
B2_of_indep m⟩
/-- Lemma 1.2.4 -/
theorem bases_card_eq {x y : finset α} {b : bases E} (hx : x ∈ b.bases) (hy : y ∈ b.bases) :
card x = card y :=
begin
by_contra heq,
wlog h : card y < card x using [x y, y x],
exact lt_or_gt_of_ne (ne.symm heq), clear heq,
let F : finset (finset α × finset α) := (finset.product b.bases b.bases).filter
(λ e : finset α × finset α, card e.1 < card e.2),
have hyx : (y, x) ∈ F := mem_filter.mpr ⟨mem_product.mpr ⟨hy, hx⟩, h⟩, clear hy hx,
exact exists.elim (min_fun_of_ne_empty (λ f : finset α × finset α, card (f.2 \ f.1)) $
ne_empty_of_mem hyx)
(λ a ha, exists.elim ha $ by { clear hyx ha,
intros haF Ha, replace haF := mem_filter.mp haF,
have hab : a.1 ∈ b.bases ∧ a.2 ∈ b.bases := mem_product.mp haF.1,
exact exists.elim (exists_sdiff_of_card_lt haF.2)
(λ e he, exists.elim (b.basis_exch hab.2 hab.1 he) $ λ aa ⟨haa1, haa2⟩,
by { rw mem_sdiff at haa1,
let a2 : finset α := insert aa (erase a.2 e),
have haani : aa ∉ erase a.2 e := λ h, haa1.2 (mem_erase.mp h).2,
have hea2 : e ∈ a.2 := (mem_sdiff.mp he).1,
have hpos : 0 < card a.2 := card_pos.mpr (ne_empty_of_mem hea2),
have hcarda2 : card a.1 < card a2 := by { rw [card_insert_of_not_mem haani,
card_erase_of_mem hea2, ←nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hpos],
exact haF.2 }, clear haani hpos,
have : e ∉ a2 := λ hh, or.elim (mem_insert.mp hh)
(λ h4, haa1.2 $ h4 ▸ hea2) $ λ h5, (mem_erase.mp h5).1 rfl,
have hcard : card (a2 \ a.1) < card (a.2 \ a.1) :=
suffices a2 \ a.1 ⊂ a.2 \ a.1, from card_lt_card this,
by { rw ssubset_iff,
exact exists.intro e ⟨λ h0, this (mem_sdiff.mp h0).1,
by { rw subset_iff,
intros A hA, rw mem_insert at hA,
exact or.elim hA (λ hA1, hA1.symm ▸ he)
(by { intro hA2, rw [mem_sdiff, mem_insert] at hA2,
exact mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨or.elim hA2.1 (λ h6, false.elim $ hA2.2 $ h6.symm ▸ haa1.1) $
λ h7, (mem_erase.mp h7).2, hA2.2⟩ }) }⟩ },
have ha2F : (a.1, a2) ∈ F := mem_filter.mpr ⟨mem_product.mpr ⟨hab.1, haa2⟩, hcarda2⟩,
exact not_le_of_lt hcard (Ha (a.1, a2) ha2F) }) })
end
def indep_indep_of_bases (b : bases E) : finset (finset α) :=
(powerset E).filter (λ x, ∃ a ∈ b.bases, x ⊆ a)
/-- first part of Theorem 1.2.3 -/
def indep_of_bases (b : bases E) : indep E :=
⟨indep_indep_of_bases b,
filter_subset _,
mem_filter.mpr ⟨empty_mem_powerset E, exists.elim (exists_mem_of_ne_empty b.bases_not_empty) $
λ a ha, exists.intro a $ exists.intro ha $ empty_subset a⟩,
begin
intros x y hx hxy, simp only [indep_indep_of_bases, mem_powerset, filter_congr_decidable,
exists_prop, mem_filter] at hx ⊢,
exact ⟨subset.trans hxy hx.1,
exists.elim hx.2 $ λ a ha, exists.intro a ⟨ha.1, subset.trans hxy ha.2⟩⟩
end,
begin
intros x y hx hy hcard, unfold indep_indep_of_bases at *,
let F := (b.bases).filter (λ S, S ⊆ y),
by_contra h, simp only [mem_powerset, not_exists, and_imp, filter_congr_decidable,
exists_prop, mem_filter, not_and, mem_sdiff] at hx hy h,
exact exists.elim hx.2 (λ b1 hb1, exists.elim hy.2 $ λ b2 hb2, exists.elim
(min_fun_of_ne_empty (λ f, card (f \ (y ∪ b1))) $ ne_empty_of_mem $ mem_filter.mpr hb2) $
λ B2 hEB2, exists.elim hEB2 $ by { clear hb2 b2 hEB2,
intros hB2filt hB2min, replace hB2filt : B2 ∈ b.bases ∧ y ⊆ B2 := mem_filter.mp hB2filt,
have hysdiff : y \ b1 = y \ x := by { simp only [ext, mem_sdiff],
exact λ gg, ⟨λ hgg, ⟨hgg.1, λ hggnx, hgg.2 $ mem_of_subset hb1.2 hggnx⟩,
λ hgg, ⟨hgg.1, λ ggb1, h gg hgg.1 hgg.2 (insert_subset.mpr
⟨mem_of_subset hy.1 hgg.1, hx.1⟩) b1 hb1.1 $ insert_subset.mpr ⟨ggb1, hb1.2⟩⟩⟩ },
have hB2yub1: B2 \ (y ∪ b1) = ∅ := by { by_contra H,
exact exists.elim (exists_mem_of_ne_empty H) (by { clear H,
intros X hX, simp only [not_or_distrib, mem_union, mem_sdiff] at hX,
have hXB2b1 : X ∈ B2 \ b1 := by { rw mem_sdiff, exact ⟨hX.1, hX.2.2⟩ },
exact exists.elim (b.basis_exch hB2filt.1 hb1.1 hXB2b1)
(λ Y ⟨hYb1B2, hYbases⟩, by { rw mem_sdiff at hYb1B2 hXB2b1,
have hssubY : insert Y (erase B2 X) \ (y ∪ b1) ⊂ B2 \ (y ∪ b1) :=
by { rw [ssubset_iff],
exact exists.intro X (by {
simp only [subset_iff, not_or_distrib, mem_union, mem_insert, not_and, mem_sdiff,
not_not, mem_erase, not_true, or_false, ne.def, false_and, or_false,
eq_self_iff_true],
exact ⟨λ hXY, false.elim $ hYb1B2.2 (hXY ▸ hXB2b1.1),
λ gg hgg, or.elim hgg (λ ggx, ggx.symm ▸ hX) $ λ ggor2, or.elim ggor2.1
(λ ggY, false.elim $ (ggY ▸ ggor2.2.2) hYb1B2.1) $
λ ggXB2, ⟨ggXB2.2, ggor2.2⟩⟩ }) },
replace hssubY := card_lt_card hssubY,
have hysubY : y ⊆ insert Y (erase B2 X) := by {
simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, mem_erase, ne.def],
exact λ gg hgg, or.inr ⟨λ ggx, hX.2.1 $ ggx ▸ hgg, mem_of_subset hB2filt.2 hgg⟩ },
exact not_lt_of_le (hB2min (insert Y $ erase B2 X) $ mem_filter.mpr
⟨hYbases, hysubY⟩) hssubY }) }) }, clear hB2min,
rw [←subset_iff_sdiff_eq_empty, subset_iff] at hB2yub1, simp only [mem_union] at hB2yub1,
have hB2b1y : B2 \ b1 = y \ b1 := by { simp only [ext, mem_sdiff],
exact λ gg, ⟨λ hgg, ⟨or.elim (hB2yub1 hgg.1) id $ λ hb1, false.elim $ hgg.2 hb1, hgg.2⟩,
λ hgg, ⟨mem_of_subset hB2filt.2 hgg.1, hgg.2⟩⟩ },
rw [hysdiff] at hB2b1y, clear hysdiff,
have hb1xuB2 : b1 \ (x ∪ B2) = ∅ := by { by_contra H,
exact exists.elim (exists_mem_of_ne_empty H)
(by { intros X hX, simp only [not_or_distrib, mem_union, mem_sdiff] at hX,
exact exists.elim (b.basis_exch hb1.1 hB2filt.1 $ mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hX.1, hX.2.2⟩)
(by { intros Y hY, rw mem_sdiff at hY,
have hYyx : Y ∈ y ∧ Y ∉ x := mem_sdiff.mp (hB2b1y ▸ (mem_sdiff.mpr hY.1)),
have hxYsub : insert Y x ⊆ insert Y (erase b1 X) := by {
simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, mem_erase, ne.def],
exact λ gg hgg, or.elim hgg (λ ggY, or.inl ggY) $ λ ggx, or.inr ⟨λ ggX, hX.2.1 $
ggX ▸ ggx, mem_of_subset hb1.2 ggx⟩ },
have : insert Y x ⊆ E := insert_subset.mpr ⟨mem_of_subset hy.1 hYyx.1, hx.1⟩,
exact h Y hYyx.1 hYyx.2 this (insert Y $ erase b1 X) hY.2 hxYsub }) }) },
clear h hx hy,
rw [←subset_iff_sdiff_eq_empty, subset_iff] at hb1xuB2, simp only [mem_union] at hb1xuB2,
have hb1B2 : b1 \ B2 = x \ B2 := by { simp only [ext, mem_sdiff],
exact λ gg, ⟨λ hgg, ⟨or.elim (hb1xuB2 hgg.1) id $ λ ggB2, false.elim $ hgg.2 ggB2, hgg.2⟩,
λ hgg, ⟨mem_of_subset hb1.2 hgg.1, hgg.2⟩⟩ }, clear hb1xuB2,
replace hb1B2 : b1 \ B2 ⊆ x \ y := hb1B2.symm ▸ (sdiff_subset_sdiff (subset.refl x)
hB2filt.2),
have hcardeq : card b1 = card B2 := bases_card_eq hb1.1 hB2filt.1,
have hcardb1B2 : card (b1 \ B2) = card (B2 \ b1) := calc
card (b1 \ B2) = card b1 - card (b1 ∩ B2) : card_sdiff_eq b1 B2
... = card B2 - card (B2 ∩ b1) : by rw [hcardeq, inter_comm]
... = card (B2 \ b1) : by rw ←card_sdiff_eq B2 b1,
have hcardcontra0 : card (y \ x) ≤ card (x \ y) := calc
card (y \ x) = card (B2 \ b1) : by rw hB2b1y
... = card (b1 \ B2) : by rw hcardb1B2
... ≤ card (x \ y) : card_le_of_subset hb1B2,
rw [card_sdiff_eq y x, card_sdiff_eq x y, inter_comm] at hcardcontra0,
have hcardcontra : card y ≤ card x := nat.le_of_le_of_sub_le_sub_right
(card_le_of_subset $ @inter_subset_left _ _ x y) hcardcontra0,
exact not_lt_of_le hcardcontra hcard })
end⟩
instance base_indep : has_coe (bases E) (indep E) := ⟨indep_of_bases⟩
instance indep_base : has_coe (indep E) (bases E) := ⟨bases_of_indep⟩
/-- second part of Theorem 1.2.3 -/
theorem base_indep_base (B : bases E) : B = bases_of_indep (indep_of_bases B) :=
suffices B.bases = (bases_of_indep $ indep_of_bases B).bases, from eq_of_base_eq this,
by { simp only [indep_of_bases, bases_of_indep, indep_indep_of_bases, is_basis,
ext, bases_bases_of_indep, mem_filter, mem_powerset, not_and, not_exists, exists_prop],
exact λ b, iff.intro
(λ hb, have hB : b ⊆ E := mem_powerset.mp (mem_of_subset B.bases_subset_powerset_ground hb),
⟨hB, ⟨⟨hB, exists.intro b ⟨hb, subset.refl b⟩⟩, λ b' _ hbb' _ _ hx H,
(ne_of_lt $ lt_of_lt_of_le (card_lt_card hbb') $ card_le_of_subset H) $ bases_card_eq hb hx⟩⟩) $
λ hb, exists.elim hb.2.1.2 $ λ a ha, have a ⊆ E := mem_powerset.mp $
B.bases_subset_powerset_ground ha.1, by { by_cases h : a = b,
{ exact h ▸ ha.1 },
{ have hba : b ⊂ a := lt_iff_ssubset.mp (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_iff_subset.mpr ha.2) $ ne.symm h),
exact false.elim (hb.2.2 a this hba this a ha.1 $ subset.refl a) } } }
theorem indep_base_indep (M : indep E) : M = indep_of_bases (bases_of_indep M) :=
suffices M.indep = (indep_of_bases $ bases_of_indep M).indep, from eq_of_indep_eq this,
by { simp only [indep_of_bases, bases_of_indep, indep_indep_of_bases, is_basis,
ext, bases_bases_of_indep, mem_filter, mem_powerset, exists_prop],
exact λ I, iff.intro (λ hI, ⟨mem_powerset.mp $ mem_of_subset M.indep_subset_powerset_ground hI,
exists.elim (exists_basis_containing_indep hI) $ λ B hB, by { unfold is_basis at hB,
exact exists.intro B ⟨⟨mem_powerset.1 $ mem_of_subset M.indep_subset_powerset_ground hB.2.1,
hB.2⟩, hB.1⟩ }⟩) $ λ hI, exists.elim hI.2 $ λ B hB, M.indep_of_subset_indep hB.1.2.1 hB.2 }
/-- Corollary 1.2.6 -/
theorem existsu_fund_circ_of_basis {m : indep E} {B : finset α} (hB : is_basis B m) {e : α}
(he : e ∈ E \ B) : ∃ C, C ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m ∧ C ⊆ insert e B ∧
∀ C' ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m, C' ⊆ insert e B → C' = C :=
begin
unfold is_basis at hB, rw mem_sdiff at he,
have : insert e B ∉ m.indep := hB.2 (insert e B) (insert_subset.mpr ⟨he.1,
mem_powerset.mp $ mem_of_subset m.indep_subset_powerset_ground hB.1⟩) (ssubset_insert he.2),
replace := existsu_circuit_of_dep_of_insert_indep hB.1 he.1 this,
exact exists.elim this (λ C ⟨hCcirc, HC⟩, exists.intro C $
⟨hCcirc, ⟨HC.1, λ C' hC'circ hC', HC.2.2 C' hC'circ ⟨hC', HC.2.1⟩⟩⟩)
end
section encodable
def fund_circ_of_basis [encodable α] {m : indep E} {B : finset α} (hB : is_basis B m) {e : α}
(he : e ∈ E \ B) : finset α :=
encodable.choose (existsu_fund_circ_of_basis hB he)
def fund_circ_of_basis_spec [encodable α] {m : indep E} {B : finset α} (hB : is_basis B m) {e : α}
(he : e ∈ E \ B) : fund_circ_of_basis hB he ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m ∧
fund_circ_of_basis hB he ⊆ insert e B ∧ ∀ C' ∈ circuits_circ_of_indep m, C' ⊆ insert e B →
C' = fund_circ_of_basis hB he :=
encodable.choose_spec (existsu_fund_circ_of_basis hB he)
end encodable
-- § 1.3
def indep_of_restriction (m : indep E) {X : finset α} (hXE : X ⊆ E) : finset (finset α) :=
(m.indep).filter (λ I, I ⊆ X)
def restriction (m : indep E) {X : finset α} (hXE : X ⊆ E) : indep X :=
⟨indep_of_restriction m hXE,
by simp only [indep_of_restriction, subset_iff, and_imp, imp_self,
mem_powerset, mem_filter, forall_true_iff],
by simp only [indep_of_restriction, m.empty_mem_indep, empty_subset, and_self, mem_filter],
by { unfold indep_of_restriction, exact λ x y hx hy, mem_filter.mpr
⟨m.indep_of_subset_indep (mem_filter.mp hx).1 hy, subset.trans hy (mem_filter.mp hx).2⟩ },
by { unfold indep_of_restriction, exact λ x y hx hy hcard,
have hxm : x ∈ m.indep := (mem_filter.mp hx).1, have hym : y ∈ m.indep := (mem_filter.mp hy).1,
have hxX : x ⊆ X := (mem_filter.mp hx).2, have hyX : y ⊆ X := (mem_filter.mp hy).2,
have H : _ := m.indep_exch hxm hym hcard,
let ⟨e, H, h₁⟩ := H in
⟨e, H, mem_filter.mpr ⟨h₁, insert_subset.mpr ⟨mem_of_subset hyX (mem_sdiff.mp H).1, hxX⟩⟩⟩ }⟩
def deletion (m : indep E) {X : finset α} (hXE : X ⊆ E) : indep (E \ X) :=
restriction m $ sdiff_subset E X
notation m `¦` hxe := restriction m hxe
notation m `\` hxe := deletion m hxe
lemma restriction_subset_restriction {X : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ E) (m : indep E) :
(m ¦ hX).indep ⊆ m.indep :=
by { simp only [restriction, indep_of_restriction, subset_iff, and_imp,
filter_congr_decidable, mem_filter],
exact λ _ hX'I _, hX'I }
lemma restriction_trans {X Y : finset α} (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ E) (m : indep E) :
(m ¦ subset.trans hXY hY) = ((m ¦ hY) ¦ hXY) :=
by { simp only [restriction, indep_of_restriction, ext, mem_filter],
exact λ I, iff.intro (λ h, ⟨⟨h.1, subset.trans h.2 hXY⟩, h.2⟩) $ λ h, ⟨h.1.1, h.2⟩ }
lemma subset_restriction_indep {X Y : finset α} {m : indep E} (hX : X ∈ m.indep) (hXY : X ⊆ Y)
(hY : Y ⊆ E) : X ∈ (m ¦ hY).indep :=
by { simp only [restriction, indep_of_restriction, mem_filter], exact ⟨hX, hXY⟩ }
/-def spans (X : finset α) {Y : finset α} (hY : Y ⊆ E) (m : indep E) : Prop :=
X ∈ bases_bases_of_indep (m ¦ hY)-/
lemma exists_basis_of_subset {X : finset α} (hXE : X ⊆ E) (m : indep E) :
∃ B, B ∈ bases_bases_of_indep (m ¦ hXE) :=
exists_mem_of_ne_empty $ B1_of_indep (m ¦ hXE)
/-lemma inter_of_span_of_subset_span {m : indep E} {X Y bX bY : finset α} {hXE : X ⊆ E}
(hbX : spans bX hXE m) {hYE : Y ⊆ E} (hbY : spans bY hYE m) (hbXbY : bX ⊆ bY) : bY ∩ X = bX :=
sorry-/
section encodable
variable [encodable α]
def basis_of_subset {X : finset α} (hXE : X ⊆ E) (m : indep E) : finset α :=
encodable.choose $ exists_basis_of_subset hXE m
def basis_of_subset_spec {X : finset α} (hXE : X ⊆ E) (m : indep E) :
basis_of_subset hXE m ∈ bases_bases_of_indep (m ¦ hXE) :=
encodable.choose_spec $ exists_basis_of_subset hXE m
notation `𝔹` := basis_of_subset
notation `𝔹ₛ` := basis_of_subset_spec
def rank_of_subset {X : finset α} (hXE : X ⊆ E) (m : indep E) : ℕ :=
card $ 𝔹 hXE m
notation `𝓇` := rank_of_subset
lemma R2_of_indep (m : indep E) {X Y : finset α} (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hYE : Y ⊆ E) :
𝓇 (subset.trans hXY hYE) m ≤ 𝓇 hYE m :=
let hXE : X ⊆ E := subset.trans hXY hYE in let bX := 𝔹 hXE m in let bY := 𝔹 hYE m in
have bXs : _ := 𝔹ₛ hXE m, have bYs : _ := 𝔹ₛ hYE m,
by { simp only [bases_bases_of_indep, mem_powerset, filter_congr_decidable, mem_filter] at bXs bYs,
unfold rank_of_subset,
have hBX : bX ∈ (m ¦ hYE).indep := mem_of_subset (restriction_subset_restriction hXY (m ¦ hYE))
((restriction_trans hXY hYE m) ▸ bXs.2.1),
exact exists.elim (exists_basis_containing_indep hBX) (λ B hB, calc
card bX ≤ card B : card_le_of_subset hB.1
... = card bY : bases_of_indep_card_eq hB.2 bYs.2) }
/-- Lemma 1.3.1 -/
lemma R3_of_indep (m : indep E) {X Y : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ E) (hY : Y ⊆ E) :
𝓇 (union_subset hX hY) m +
𝓇 (subset.trans (@inter_subset_left _ _ X Y) hX) m ≤
𝓇 hX m + 𝓇 hY m :=
begin
have hXXuY : X ⊆ X ∪ Y := @subset_union_left _ _ X Y,
have hYXuY : Y ⊆ X ∪ Y := @subset_union_right _ _ X Y,
have hXiYX : X ∩ Y ⊆ X := @inter_subset_left _ _ X Y,
have hXuY : X ∪ Y ⊆ E := union_subset hX hY,
have hXiY : X ∩ Y ⊆ E := subset.trans hXiYX hX,
let bXuY := 𝔹 hXuY m, let bXiY := 𝔹 hXiY m,
let bX := 𝔹 hX m, let bY := 𝔹 hY m,
unfold rank_of_subset,
have bXuYs := 𝔹ₛ hXuY m, have bXiYs := 𝔹ₛ hXiY m,
have bXs := 𝔹ₛ hX m, have bYs := 𝔹ₛ hY m,
simp only [bases_bases_of_indep, mem_powerset, filter_congr_decidable, mem_filter]
at bXuYs bXiYs bXs bYs,
have rXiY : 𝓇 hXiY m = card bXiY := by simp only [rank_of_subset],
have hiu : X ∩ Y ⊆ X ∪ Y := subset.trans hXiYX hXXuY,
have hbXiY : bXiY ∈ (m ¦ hXuY).indep := mem_of_subset
(restriction_subset_restriction hiu (m ¦ hXuY)) ((restriction_trans hiu hXuY m) ▸ bXiYs.2.1),
have HbbXiY := exists_basis_containing_indep hbXiY,
exact exists.elim HbbXiY (by { intros B hB,
have rXuY : 𝓇 hXuY m = card B := by { simp only [rank_of_subset],
exact bases_of_indep_card_eq bXuYs.2 hB.2 },
have hBXuY : B ⊆ X ∪ Y := mem_powerset.mp ((m ¦ hXuY).indep_subset_powerset_ground hB.2.1),
have hBX : B ∩ X ∈ (m ¦ hX).indep := have hsub : _ := restriction_trans hXXuY hXuY m,
have hBX : _ := ((m ¦ hXuY).indep_of_subset_indep hB.2.1 $ @inter_subset_left _ _ B X),
hsub.symm ▸ (subset_restriction_indep hBX (@inter_subset_right _ _ B X) hXXuY),
have hBY : B ∩ Y ∈ (m ¦ hY).indep := have hsub : _ := restriction_trans hYXuY hXuY m,
have hBY : _ := ((m ¦ hXuY).indep_of_subset_indep hB.2.1 $ @inter_subset_left _ _ B Y),
hsub.symm ▸ (subset_restriction_indep hBY (@inter_subset_right _ _ B Y) hYXuY),
have hBXr : card (B ∩ X) ≤ 𝓇 hX m := by { unfold rank_of_subset,
exact card_of_indep_le_card_basis hBX bXs.2 },
have hBYr : card (B ∩ Y) ≤ 𝓇 hY m := by { unfold rank_of_subset,
exact card_of_indep_le_card_basis hBY bYs.2 },
have hinter : (B ∩ X) ∩ (B ∩ Y) = B ∩ X ∩ Y := by simp only [finset.inter_assoc,
inter_right_comm, inter_self, inter_comm, inter_left_comm],
have hBXiY : B ∩ X ∩ Y = bXiY :=
by { have hsub : B ∩ X ∩ Y ⊆ bXiY :=
by { by_contra h,
exact exists.elim (exists_mem_of_ne_empty $ (mt subset_iff_sdiff_eq_empty.mpr) h)
(by { intros a ha, rw [mem_sdiff, inter_assoc, mem_inter] at ha, unfold is_basis at bXiYs,
have := ssubset_insert ha.2,
have hbXiYsubXiY : insert a bXiY ⊆ X ∩ Y:= insert_subset.mpr ⟨ha.1.2, bXiYs.1⟩,
have hrestrict : (m ¦ hXiY) = (m ¦ hXuY ¦ hiu) := restriction_trans hiu hXuY m,
have hindep : insert a bXiY ∈ (m ¦ hXiY).indep := hrestrict.symm ▸
(subset_restriction_indep ((m ¦ hXuY).indep_of_subset_indep hB.2.1
$ insert_subset.mpr ⟨ha.1.1, hB.1⟩) hbXiYsubXiY hiu),
exact bXiYs.2.2 (insert a bXiY) hbXiYsubXiY this hindep }) },
have hsuper : bXiY ⊆ B ∩ X ∩ Y :=
by { rw [inter_assoc],
have := inter_subset_inter_right hB.1,
have h : bXiY ∩ (X ∩ Y) = bXiY := inter_of_subset bXiYs.1,
exact h ▸ this },
exact subset.antisymm hsub hsuper },
exact calc 𝓇 hX m + 𝓇 hY m ≥ card (B ∩ X) + card (B ∩ Y) : add_le_add hBXr hBYr
... = card ((B ∩ X) ∪ (B ∩ Y)) + card ((B ∩ X) ∩ (B ∩ Y)) : card_union_inter (B ∩ X) (B ∩ Y)
... = card (B ∩ (X ∪ Y)) + card (B ∩ X ∩ Y) : by rw [←inter_distrib_left, hinter]
... = card B + card bXiY : by rw [inter_of_subset hBXuY, hBXiY]
... = 𝓇 hXuY m + 𝓇 hXiY m : by rw [rXuY, rXiY] })
end
end encodable
structure rank (ground : finset α) :=
(r {X : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ ground) : ℕ)
-- (R1)
(bounded {X : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ ground) : 0 ≤ r hX ∧ r hX ≤ card X)
-- (R2)
(order_preserving {X Y : finset α} (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ ground) : r (subset.trans hXY hY) ≤ r hY)
-- (R3)
(submodular {X Y : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ ground) (hY : Y ⊆ ground) :
r (union_subset hX hY) + r (subset.trans (@inter_subset_left _ _ X Y) hX) ≤ r hX + r hY)
section encodable
variable [encodable α]
def rank_of_indep (m : indep E) : rank E :=
⟨λ X hX, rank_of_subset hX m,
λ X hX, ⟨dec_trivial, (by { have := basis_of_subset_spec hX m,
simp only [bases_bases_of_indep, mem_powerset, filter_congr_decidable, mem_filter] at this,
exact card_le_of_subset this.1 })⟩,
λ X Y hXY hY, R2_of_indep m hXY hY,
λ X Y hX hY, R3_of_indep m hX hY⟩
end encodable
structure rank_R2_R3 (ground : finset α) :=
(r {X : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ ground) : ℕ)
-- (R2)
(order_preserving {X Y : finset α} (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ ground) : r (subset.trans hXY hY) ≤ r hY)
-- (R3)
(submodular {X Y : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ ground) (hY : Y ⊆ ground) :
r (union_subset hX hY) + r (subset.trans (@inter_subset_left _ _ X Y) hX) ≤ r hX + r hY)
lemma congr_for_rank (rk : rank_R2_R3 E ) {X Y : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ E) (hY : Y ⊆ E) (h : X = Y) :
rk.r hX = rk.r hY :=
by { congr, exact h }
-- Lemma 1.3.3
lemma rank_union_lemma (rk : rank_R2_R3 E) {X Y : finset α} (hX : X ⊆ E) (hY : Y ⊆ E)
(hy : ∀ y, ∀ (h : y ∈ Y \ X), rk.r (by { rw mem_sdiff at h,
exact insert_subset.mpr ⟨mem_of_subset hY h.1, hX⟩ }) = rk.r hX) :
rk.r (union_subset hX hY) = rk.r hX :=
begin
have hXuY : X ∪ Y ⊆ E := union_subset hX hY,
induction h : (Y \ X) using finset.induction with a S ha ih generalizing X Y,
{ congr, have H := congr_arg (λ x, X ∪ x) h,
simp only [union_sdiff_self_eq_union, union_empty] at H, exact H },
{ have h₁ : rk.r hX + rk.r hX ≥ rk.r hXuY + rk.r hX :=
by { have haa : a ∈ Y \ X := h.substr (mem_insert_self a S),
have haX : insert a X ⊆ E := insert_subset.mpr ⟨mem_of_subset hY (mem_sdiff.mp haa).1, hX⟩,
have hins : insert a S ⊆ E := h ▸ subset.trans (sdiff_subset Y X) hY,
have hS : S ⊆ E := subset.trans (subset_insert a S) hins,
have hXS : X ∪ S ⊆ E := union_subset hX hS,
have hrins : rk.r haX = rk.r hX := hy a haa, rw mem_sdiff at haa,
have hrS : rk.r hXS = rk.r hX := by {
exact ih hX hS (by { intros y Hy, have : y ∈ Y \ X := by { rw mem_sdiff at Hy,
simp only [ext, mem_insert, mem_sdiff] at h,
exact mem_sdiff.mpr ((h y).mpr $ or.inr Hy.1) }, exact hy y this })
hXS (by { simp only [ext, mem_insert, mem_sdiff] at h ⊢,
exact λ y, iff.intro (λ Hy, Hy.1) $ λ Hy, ⟨Hy, ((h y).mpr $ or.inr Hy).2⟩ }) },
have hXuSiaX : (X ∪ S) ∩ insert a X ⊆ E := (subset.trans (@inter_subset_right _ _ (X ∪ S)
(insert a X)) haX),
have hr₁ : rk.r (union_subset hXS haX) = rk.r hXuY :=
by { exact congr_for_rank rk (union_subset hXS haX) hXuY (by {
simp only [ext, mem_union, union_comm, mem_insert, mem_sdiff, union_insert,
union_self, union_assoc] at h ⊢,
exact λ x, iff.intro (λ hx, or.elim hx (λ hxa, or.inr $ hxa.substr haa.1) $
λ H, or.elim H (by { intro hxS, exact or.inr ((h x).mpr $ or.inr hxS).1}) $
by {exact (λ hxX, or.inl hxX) }) $
λ hx, or.elim hx (by {intro hxX, exact or.inr (or.inr hxX)}) $
by { intro hxY, by_cases hxX : x ∈ X,
{ exact or.inr (or.inr hxX) },
{ exact or.elim ((h x).mp ⟨hxY, hxX⟩) (λ H, or.inl H)
(λ HS, or.inr $ or.inl HS) } } }) },
have hr₂ : rk.r hXuSiaX = rk.r hX := by { congr,
simp only [ext, mem_union, union_comm, mem_insert, mem_inter],
exact λ x, iff.intro (λ hx, or.elim hx.1 (or.elim hx.2
(λ H₁ H₂, false.elim $ ha $ H₁.subst H₂) $ λ h _, h) id) (λ hx, ⟨or.inr hx, or.inr hx⟩) },
calc rk.r hX + rk.r hX = rk.r hXS + rk.r haX : by rw [hrS, hrins]
... ≥ rk.r (union_subset hXS haX) + rk.r hXuSiaX : rk.submodular (union_subset hX hS) haX
... = _ : by rw [hr₁, hr₂] },
replace h₁ := le_of_add_le_add_right h₁,
have h₂ : rk.r hX ≤ rk.r hXuY := rk.order_preserving (@subset_union_left _ _ X Y) hXuY,
exact nat.le_antisymm h₁ h₂ }
end
def indep_of_rank (r : rank E) : indep E :=
⟨sorry,
sorry,
sorry,
sorry,
sorry⟩
end matroid
|
a8e495d00b07df87598c03ba6bf279459bc79fff | 626e312b5c1cb2d88fca108f5933076012633192 | /src/algebra/squarefree.lean | be40dcfc1b7f0cf1cd220d9528ce227db6da473a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Bioye97/mathlib | 9db2f9ee54418d29dd06996279ba9dc874fd6beb | 782a20a27ee83b523f801ff34efb1a9557085019 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,305,956,488 | 1,631,067,774,000 | 1,631,067,774,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,429 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import ring_theory.unique_factorization_domain
import ring_theory.int.basic
import number_theory.divisors
/-!
# Squarefree elements of monoids
An element of a monoid is squarefree when it is not divisible by any squares
except the squares of units.
## Main Definitions
- `squarefree r` indicates that `r` is only divisible by `x * x` if `x` is a unit.
## Main Results
- `multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one`: `x` is `squarefree` iff for every `y`, either
`multiplicity y x ≤ 1` or `is_unit y`.
- `unique_factorization_monoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors`: A nonzero element `x` of a unique
factorization monoid is squarefree iff `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
- `nat.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors`: A positive natural number `x` is squarefree iff
the list `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
## Tags
squarefree, multiplicity
-/
variables {R : Type*}
/-- An element of a monoid is squarefree if the only squares that
divide it are the squares of units. -/
def squarefree [monoid R] (r : R) : Prop := ∀ x : R, x * x ∣ r → is_unit x
@[simp]
lemma is_unit.squarefree [comm_monoid R] {x : R} (h : is_unit x) :
squarefree x :=
λ y hdvd, is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left (is_unit_of_dvd_unit hdvd h)
@[simp]
lemma squarefree_one [comm_monoid R] : squarefree (1 : R) :=
is_unit_one.squarefree
@[simp]
lemma not_squarefree_zero [monoid_with_zero R] [nontrivial R] : ¬ squarefree (0 : R) :=
begin
erw [not_forall],
exact ⟨0, (by simp)⟩,
end
@[simp]
lemma irreducible.squarefree [comm_monoid R] {x : R} (h : irreducible x) :
squarefree x :=
begin
rintros y ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw mul_assoc at hz,
rcases h.is_unit_or_is_unit hz with hu | hu,
{ exact hu },
{ apply is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left hu },
end
@[simp]
lemma prime.squarefree [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero R] {x : R} (h : prime x) :
squarefree x :=
h.irreducible.squarefree
lemma squarefree_of_dvd_of_squarefree [comm_monoid R]
{x y : R} (hdvd : x ∣ y) (hsq : squarefree y) :
squarefree x :=
λ a h, hsq _ (h.trans hdvd)
namespace multiplicity
variables [comm_monoid R] [decidable_rel (has_dvd.dvd : R → R → Prop)]
lemma squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one (r : R) :
squarefree r ↔ ∀ x : R, multiplicity x r ≤ 1 ∨ is_unit x :=
begin
refine forall_congr (λ a, _),
rw [← sq, pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, or_iff_not_imp_left, not_le, imp_congr],
swap, { refl },
convert enat.add_one_le_iff_lt (enat.coe_ne_top _),
norm_cast,
end
end multiplicity
namespace unique_factorization_monoid
variables [comm_cancel_monoid_with_zero R] [nontrivial R] [unique_factorization_monoid R]
variables [normalization_monoid R]
lemma squarefree_iff_nodup_factors [decidable_eq R] {x : R} (x0 : x ≠ 0) :
squarefree x ↔ multiset.nodup (factors x) :=
begin
have drel : decidable_rel (has_dvd.dvd : R → R → Prop),
{ classical,
apply_instance, },
haveI := drel,
rw [multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one, multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one],
split; intros h a,
{ by_cases hmem : a ∈ factors x,
{ have ha := irreducible_of_factor _ hmem,
rcases h a with h | h,
{ rw ← normalize_factor _ hmem,
rw [multiplicity_eq_count_factors ha x0] at h,
assumption_mod_cast },
{ have := ha.1, contradiction, } },
{ simp [multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem hmem] } },
{ rw or_iff_not_imp_right, intro hu,
by_cases h0 : a = 0,
{ simp [h0, x0] },
rcases wf_dvd_monoid.exists_irreducible_factor hu h0 with ⟨b, hib, hdvd⟩,
apply le_trans (multiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_of_dvd_left hdvd),
rw [multiplicity_eq_count_factors hib x0],
specialize h (normalize b),
assumption_mod_cast }
end
lemma dvd_pow_iff_dvd_of_squarefree {x y : R} {n : ℕ} (hsq : squarefree x) (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
x ∣ y ^ n ↔ x ∣ y :=
begin
classical,
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ simp [hx, pow_eq_zero_iff (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)] },
by_cases hy : y = 0,
{ simp [hy, zero_pow (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)] },
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, h.pow h0⟩,
rw [dvd_iff_factors_le_factors hx (pow_ne_zero n hy), factors_pow,
((squarefree_iff_nodup_factors hx).1 hsq).le_nsmul_iff_le h0] at h,
rwa dvd_iff_factors_le_factors hx hy,
end
end unique_factorization_monoid
namespace nat
lemma squarefree_iff_nodup_factors {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
squarefree n ↔ n.factors.nodup :=
begin
rw [unique_factorization_monoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors h0, nat.factors_eq],
simp,
end
instance : decidable_pred (squarefree : ℕ → Prop)
| 0 := is_false not_squarefree_zero
| (n + 1) := decidable_of_iff _ (squarefree_iff_nodup_factors (nat.succ_ne_zero n)).symm
open unique_factorization_monoid
lemma divisors_filter_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
(n.divisors.filter squarefree).val =
(unique_factorization_monoid.factors n).to_finset.powerset.val.map (λ x, x.val.prod) :=
begin
rw multiset.nodup_ext (finset.nodup _) (multiset.nodup_map_on _ (finset.nodup _)),
{ intro a,
simp only [multiset.mem_filter, id.def, multiset.mem_map, finset.filter_val, ← finset.mem_def,
mem_divisors],
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨an, h0⟩, hsq⟩,
use (unique_factorization_monoid.factors a).to_finset,
simp only [id.def, finset.mem_powerset],
rcases an with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rw mul_ne_zero_iff at h0,
rw unique_factorization_monoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors h0.1 at hsq,
rw [multiset.to_finset_subset, multiset.to_finset_val, multiset.erase_dup_eq_self.2 hsq,
← associated_iff_eq, factors_mul h0.1 h0.2],
exact ⟨multiset.subset_of_le (multiset.le_add_right _ _), factors_prod h0.1⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩,
rw [finset.mem_powerset, ← finset.val_le_iff, multiset.to_finset_val] at hs,
have hs0 : s.val.prod ≠ 0,
{ rw [ne.def, multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff],
simp only [exists_prop, id.def, exists_eq_right],
intro con,
apply not_irreducible_zero (irreducible_of_factor 0
(multiset.mem_erase_dup.1 (multiset.mem_of_le hs con))) },
rw (factors_prod h0).symm.dvd_iff_dvd_right,
refine ⟨⟨multiset.prod_dvd_prod (le_trans hs (multiset.erase_dup_le _)), h0⟩, _⟩,
have h := unique_factorization_monoid.factors_unique irreducible_of_factor
(λ x hx, irreducible_of_factor x (multiset.mem_of_le
(le_trans hs (multiset.erase_dup_le _)) hx)) (factors_prod hs0),
rw [associated_eq_eq, multiset.rel_eq] at h,
rw [unique_factorization_monoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors hs0, h],
apply s.nodup } },
{ intros x hx y hy h,
rw [← finset.val_inj, ← multiset.rel_eq, ← associated_eq_eq],
rw [← finset.mem_def, finset.mem_powerset] at hx hy,
apply unique_factorization_monoid.factors_unique _ _ (associated_iff_eq.2 h),
{ intros z hz,
apply irreducible_of_factor z,
rw ← multiset.mem_to_finset,
apply hx hz },
{ intros z hz,
apply irreducible_of_factor z,
rw ← multiset.mem_to_finset,
apply hy hz } }
end
open_locale big_operators
lemma sum_divisors_filter_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0)
{α : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α] {f : ℕ → α} :
∑ i in (n.divisors.filter squarefree), f i =
∑ i in (unique_factorization_monoid.factors n).to_finset.powerset, f (i.val.prod) :=
by rw [finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, divisors_filter_squarefree h0, multiset.map_map,
finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum]
lemma sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
∃ a b : ℕ, 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ b ^ 2 * a = n ∧ squarefree a :=
begin
let S := {s ∈ finset.range (n + 1) | s ∣ n ∧ ∃ x, s = x ^ 2},
have hSne : S.nonempty,
{ use 1,
have h1 : 0 < n ∧ ∃ (x : ℕ), 1 = x ^ 2 := ⟨hn, ⟨1, (one_pow 2).symm⟩⟩,
simpa [S] },
let s := finset.max' S hSne,
have hs : s ∈ S := finset.max'_mem S hSne,
simp only [finset.sep_def, S, finset.mem_filter, finset.mem_range] at hs,
obtain ⟨hsn1, ⟨a, hsa⟩, ⟨b, hsb⟩⟩ := hs,
rw hsa at hn,
obtain ⟨hlts, hlta⟩ := canonically_ordered_comm_semiring.mul_pos.mp hn,
rw hsb at hsa hn hlts,
refine ⟨a, b, hlta, (pow_pos_iff zero_lt_two).mp hlts, hsa.symm, _⟩,
rintro x ⟨y, hy⟩,
rw nat.is_unit_iff,
by_contra hx,
refine lt_le_antisymm _ (finset.le_max' S ((b * x) ^ 2) _),
{ simp_rw [S, hsa, finset.sep_def, finset.mem_filter, finset.mem_range],
refine ⟨lt_succ_iff.mpr (le_of_dvd hn _), _, ⟨b * x, rfl⟩⟩; use y; rw hy; ring },
{ convert lt_mul_of_one_lt_right hlts
(one_lt_pow 2 x zero_lt_two (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨λ h, by simp * at *, hx⟩)),
rw mul_pow },
end
lemma sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos' {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) :
∃ a b : ℕ, (b + 1) ^ 2 * (a + 1) = n ∧ squarefree (a + 1) :=
begin
obtain ⟨a₁, b₁, ha₁, hb₁, hab₁, hab₂⟩ := sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos h,
refine ⟨a₁.pred, b₁.pred, _, _⟩;
simpa only [add_one, succ_pred_eq_of_pos, ha₁, hb₁],
end
lemma sq_mul_squarefree (n : ℕ) : ∃ a b : ℕ, b ^ 2 * a = n ∧ squarefree a :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact ⟨1, 0, (by simp), squarefree_one⟩ },
{ obtain ⟨a, b, -, -, h₁, h₂⟩ := sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos (succ_pos n),
exact ⟨a, b, h₁, h₂⟩ },
end
end nat
|
174cd144da1691131eda9429d58c5415acdcc93c | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /library/init/algebra/norm_num.lean | 77a951df04b99c6074d477a0c6eaa13f61df121a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,740 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Lewis and Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.algebra.field init.algebra.ordered_ring
import init.data.nat.lemmas
namespace norm_num
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
def add1 [has_add α] [has_one α] (a : α) : α :=
a + 1
local attribute [reducible] bit0 bit1 add1
local attribute [simp] right_distrib left_distrib
private meta def u : tactic unit :=
`[unfold bit0 bit1 add1]
private meta def usimp : tactic unit :=
u >> `[simp]
lemma mul_zero [mul_zero_class α] (a : α) : a * 0 = 0 :=
by simp
lemma zero_mul [mul_zero_class α] (a : α) : 0 * a = 0 :=
by simp
lemma mul_one [monoid α] (a : α) : a * 1 = a :=
by simp
lemma mul_bit0 [distrib α] (a b : α) : a * (bit0 b) = bit0 (a * b) :=
by simp
lemma mul_bit0_helper [distrib α] (a b t : α) (h : a * b = t) : a * (bit0 b) = bit0 t :=
begin rw [← h], simp end
lemma mul_bit1 [semiring α] (a b : α) : a * (bit1 b) = bit0 (a * b) + a :=
by simp
lemma mul_bit1_helper [semiring α] (a b s t : α) (hs : a * b = s) (ht : bit0 s + a = t) :
a * (bit1 b) = t :=
by simp [hs, ht]
lemma subst_into_prod [has_mul α] (l r tl tr t : α) (prl : l = tl) (prr : r = tr) (prt : tl * tr = t) : l * r = t :=
by simp [prl, prr, prt]
lemma mk_cong (op : α → α) (a b : α) (h : a = b) : op a = op b :=
by simp [h]
lemma neg_add_neg_eq_of_add_add_eq_zero [add_comm_group α] (a b c : α) (h : c + a + b = 0) : -a + -b = c :=
begin
apply add_neg_eq_of_eq_add,
apply neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero,
simp at h, simp, assumption
end
lemma neg_add_neg_helper [add_comm_group α] (a b c : α) (h : a + b = c) : -a + -b = -c :=
begin apply @neg_inj α, simp [neg_add, neg_neg], assumption end
lemma neg_add_pos_eq_of_eq_add [add_comm_group α] (a b c : α) (h : b = c + a) : -a + b = c :=
begin apply neg_add_eq_of_eq_add, simp at h, assumption end
lemma neg_add_pos_helper1 [add_comm_group α] (a b c : α) (h : b + c = a) : -a + b = -c :=
begin apply neg_add_eq_of_eq_add, apply eq_add_neg_of_add_eq h end
lemma neg_add_pos_helper2 [add_comm_group α] (a b c : α) (h : a + c = b) : -a + b = c :=
begin apply neg_add_eq_of_eq_add, rw h end
lemma pos_add_neg_helper [add_comm_group α] (a b c : α) (h : b + a = c) : a + b = c :=
by rw [← h, add_comm a b]
lemma subst_into_subtr [add_group α] (l r t : α) (h : l + -r = t) : l - r = t :=
by simp [h]
lemma neg_neg_helper [add_group α] (a b : α) (h : a = -b) : -a = b :=
by simp [h]
lemma neg_mul_neg_helper [ring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) : (-a) * (-b) = c :=
by simp [h]
lemma neg_mul_pos_helper [ring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) : (-a) * b = -c :=
by simp [h]
lemma pos_mul_neg_helper [ring α] (a b c : α) (h : a * b = c) : a * (-b) = -c :=
by simp [h]
lemma div_add_helper [field α] (n d b c val : α) (hd : d ≠ 0) (h : n + b * d = val)
(h2 : c * d = val) : n / d + b = c :=
begin
apply eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_nonzero_right hd,
rw [h2, ← h, right_distrib, div_mul_cancel _ hd]
end
lemma add_div_helper [field α] (n d b c val : α) (hd : d ≠ 0) (h : d * b + n = val)
(h2 : d * c = val) : b + n / d = c :=
begin
apply eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_nonzero_left hd,
rw [h2, ← h, left_distrib, mul_div_cancel' _ hd]
end
lemma div_mul_helper [field α] (n d c v : α) (hd : d ≠ 0) (h : (n * c) / d = v) :
(n / d) * c = v :=
by rw [← h, field.div_mul_eq_mul_div_comm _ _ hd, mul_div_assoc]
lemma mul_div_helper [field α] (a n d v : α) (hd : d ≠ 0) (h : (a * n) / d = v) :
a * (n / d) = v :=
by rw [← h, mul_div_assoc]
lemma nonzero_of_div_helper [field α] (a b : α) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≠ 0 :=
begin
intro hab,
have habb : (a / b) * b = 0, rw [hab, zero_mul],
rw [div_mul_cancel _ hb] at habb,
exact ha habb
end
lemma div_helper [field α] (n d v : α) (hd : d ≠ 0) (h : v * d = n) : n / d = v :=
begin
apply eq_of_mul_eq_mul_of_nonzero_right hd,
rw (div_mul_cancel _ hd),
exact eq.symm h
end
lemma div_eq_div_helper [field α] (a b c d v : α) (h1 : a * d = v) (h2 : c * b = v)
(hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b = c / d :=
begin
apply eq_div_of_mul_eq,
exact hd,
rw div_mul_eq_mul_div,
apply eq.symm,
apply eq_div_of_mul_eq,
exact hb,
rw [h1, h2]
end
lemma subst_into_div [has_div α] (a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ v : α) (h : a₁ / b₁ = v) (h1 : a₂ = a₁)
(h2 : b₂ = b₁) : a₂ / b₂ = v :=
by rw [h1, h2, h]
lemma add_comm_four [add_comm_semigroup α] (a b : α) : a + a + (b + b) = (a + b) + (a + b) :=
by simp
lemma add_comm_middle [add_comm_semigroup α] (a b c : α) : a + b + c = a + c + b :=
by simp
lemma bit0_add_bit0 [add_comm_semigroup α] (a b : α) : bit0 a + bit0 b = bit0 (a + b) :=
by usimp
lemma bit0_add_bit0_helper [add_comm_semigroup α] (a b t : α) (h : a + b = t) :
bit0 a + bit0 b = bit0 t :=
begin rw [← h], usimp end
lemma bit1_add_bit0 [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a b : α) : bit1 a + bit0 b = bit1 (a + b) :=
by usimp
lemma bit1_add_bit0_helper [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a b t : α)
(h : a + b = t) : bit1 a + bit0 b = bit1 t :=
begin rw [← h], usimp end
lemma bit0_add_bit1 [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a b : α) :
bit0 a + bit1 b = bit1 (a + b) :=
by usimp
lemma bit0_add_bit1_helper [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a b t : α)
(h : a + b = t) : bit0 a + bit1 b = bit1 t :=
begin rw [← h], usimp end
lemma bit1_add_bit1 [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a b : α) :
bit1 a + bit1 b = bit0 (add1 (a + b)) :=
by usimp
lemma bit1_add_bit1_helper [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a b t s : α)
(h : (a + b) = t) (h2 : add1 t = s) : bit1 a + bit1 b = bit0 s :=
begin rw [← h] at h2, rw [← h2], usimp end
lemma bin_add_zero [add_monoid α] (a : α) : a + 0 = a :=
by simp
lemma bin_zero_add [add_monoid α] (a : α) : 0 + a = a :=
by simp
lemma one_add_bit0 [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a : α) : 1 + bit0 a = bit1 a :=
begin unfold bit0 bit1, simp end
lemma bit0_add_one [has_add α] [has_one α] (a : α) : bit0 a + 1 = bit1 a :=
rfl
lemma bit1_add_one [has_add α] [has_one α] (a : α) : bit1 a + 1 = add1 (bit1 a) :=
rfl
lemma bit1_add_one_helper [has_add α] [has_one α] (a t : α) (h : add1 (bit1 a) = t) :
bit1 a + 1 = t :=
by rw [← h]
lemma one_add_bit1 [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a : α) : 1 + bit1 a = add1 (bit1 a) :=
begin unfold bit0 bit1 add1, simp end
lemma one_add_bit1_helper [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a t : α)
(h : add1 (bit1 a) = t) : 1 + bit1 a = t :=
begin rw [← h], usimp end
lemma add1_bit0 [has_add α] [has_one α] (a : α) : add1 (bit0 a) = bit1 a :=
rfl
lemma add1_bit1 [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a : α) :
add1 (bit1 a) = bit0 (add1 a) :=
by usimp
lemma add1_bit1_helper [add_comm_semigroup α] [has_one α] (a t : α) (h : add1 a = t) :
add1 (bit1 a) = bit0 t :=
begin rw [← h], usimp end
lemma add1_one [has_add α] [has_one α] : add1 (1 : α) = bit0 1 :=
rfl
lemma add1_zero [add_monoid α] [has_one α] : add1 (0 : α) = 1 :=
by usimp
lemma one_add_one [has_add α] [has_one α] : (1 : α) + 1 = bit0 1 :=
rfl
lemma subst_into_sum [has_add α] (l r tl tr t : α) (prl : l = tl) (prr : r = tr)
(prt : tl + tr = t) : l + r = t :=
by rw [← prt, prr, prl]
lemma neg_zero_helper [add_group α] (a : α) (h : a = 0) : - a = 0 :=
begin rw h, simp end
lemma pos_bit0_helper [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : a > 0) : bit0 a > 0 :=
begin u, apply add_pos h h end
lemma nonneg_bit0_helper [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : a ≥ 0) : bit0 a ≥ 0 :=
begin u, apply add_nonneg h h end
lemma pos_bit1_helper [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : a ≥ 0) : bit1 a > 0 :=
begin
u,
apply add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos,
apply nonneg_bit0_helper _ h,
apply zero_lt_one
end
lemma nonneg_bit1_helper [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : a ≥ 0) : bit1 a ≥ 0 :=
begin apply le_of_lt, apply pos_bit1_helper _ h end
lemma nonzero_of_pos_helper [linear_ordered_semiring α] (a : α) (h : a > 0) : a ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt h
lemma nonzero_of_neg_helper [linear_ordered_ring α] (a : α) (h : a ≠ 0) : -a ≠ 0 :=
begin intro ha, apply h, apply neg_inj, rwa neg_zero end
lemma sub_nat_zero_helper {a b c d: ℕ} (hac : a = c) (hbd : b = d) (hcd : c < d) : a - b = 0 :=
begin
simp *, apply nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le, apply le_of_lt, assumption
end
lemma sub_nat_pos_helper {a b c d e : ℕ} (hac : a = c) (hbd : b = d) (hced : e + d = c) :
a - b = e :=
begin
simp *, rw [← hced, nat.add_sub_cancel]
end
end norm_num
|
1498a23feab8da39993962c0b7cbe6f37a0bcbc6 | efce24474b28579aba3272fdb77177dc2b11d7aa | /src/for_mathlib/data_sum.lean | afa87088eb8fe9d88848b72c92d0e633e21f064e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rwbarton/lean-homotopy-theory | cff499f24268d60e1c546e7c86c33f58c62888ed | 39e1b4ea1ed1b0eca2f68bc64162dde6a6396dee | refs/heads/lean-3.4.2 | 1,622,711,883,224 | 1,598,550,958,000 | 1,598,550,958,000 | 136,023,667 | 12 | 6 | Apache-2.0 | 1,573,187,573,000 | 1,528,116,262,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 718 | lean | import data.sum
import data.set
open sum
lemma preimage_inl_image_inl {α β : Type*} (u : set α) :
@inl α β ⁻¹' (@inl α β '' u) = u :=
set.preimage_image_eq u (λ _ _, inl.inj_iff.mp)
lemma preimage_inl_image_inr {α β : Type*} (u : set β) :
@inl α β ⁻¹' (@inr α β '' u) = ∅ :=
set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr (assume b ⟨a, _, h⟩, inr_ne_inl h)
lemma preimage_inr_image_inl {α β : Type*} (u : set α) :
@inr α β ⁻¹' (@inl α β '' u) = ∅ :=
set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr (assume a ⟨b, _, h⟩, inl_ne_inr h)
lemma preimage_inr_image_inr {α β : Type*} (u : set β) :
@inr α β ⁻¹' (@inr α β '' u) = u :=
set.preimage_image_eq u (λ _ _, inr.inj_iff.mp)
|
f665e9101398cbb45d284d531e0b05c873c1f37b | 8e691ffe296a38e3e9dc95845e5b607422c3c973 | /src/topology/basic.lean | 90ddee921f296a801df8dda9da585f98966a878b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jmvlangen/mathlib | 8d847f7831f0e8ddebc99568704530af7c9e1a50 | 82f79a58df3047b8002bbaf90ce50da2a978e114 | refs/heads/master | 1,588,094,154,678 | 1,552,412,266,000 | 1,552,412,266,000 | 175,439,673 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 34,592 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Theory of topological spaces.
Parts of the formalization is based on the books:
N. Bourbaki: General Topology
I. M. James: Topologies and Uniformities
A major difference is that this formalization is heavily based on the filter library.
-/
import order.filter data.set.countable tactic
open set filter lattice classical
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
universes u v w
structure topological_space (α : Type u) :=
(is_open : set α → Prop)
(is_open_univ : is_open univ)
(is_open_inter : ∀s t, is_open s → is_open t → is_open (s ∩ t))
(is_open_sUnion : ∀s, (∀t∈s, is_open t) → is_open (⋃₀ s))
attribute [class] topological_space
section topological_space
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {a : α} {s s₁ s₂ : set α} {p p₁ p₂ : α → Prop}
@[extensionality]
lemma topological_space_eq : ∀ {f g : topological_space α}, f.is_open = g.is_open → f = g
| ⟨a, _, _, _⟩ ⟨b, _, _, _⟩ rfl := rfl
section
variables [t : topological_space α]
include t
/-- `is_open s` means that `s` is open in the ambient topological space on `α` -/
def is_open (s : set α) : Prop := topological_space.is_open t s
@[simp]
lemma is_open_univ : is_open (univ : set α) := topological_space.is_open_univ t
lemma is_open_inter (h₁ : is_open s₁) (h₂ : is_open s₂) : is_open (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
topological_space.is_open_inter t s₁ s₂ h₁ h₂
lemma is_open_sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : ∀t ∈ s, is_open t) : is_open (⋃₀ s) :=
topological_space.is_open_sUnion t s h
end
lemma is_open_fold {s : set α} {t : topological_space α} : t.is_open s = @is_open α t s :=
rfl
variables [topological_space α]
lemma is_open_Union {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, is_open (f i)) : is_open (⋃i, f i) :=
is_open_sUnion $ by rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩; exact h i
lemma is_open_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (h : ∀i∈s, is_open (f i)) :
is_open (⋃i∈s, f i) :=
is_open_Union $ assume i, is_open_Union $ assume hi, h i hi
lemma is_open_union (h₁ : is_open s₁) (h₂ : is_open s₂) : is_open (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
by rw union_eq_Union; exact is_open_Union (bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
@[simp] lemma is_open_empty : is_open (∅ : set α) :=
by rw ← sUnion_empty; exact is_open_sUnion (assume a, false.elim)
lemma is_open_sInter {s : set (set α)} (hs : finite s) : (∀t ∈ s, is_open t) → is_open (⋂₀ s) :=
finite.induction_on hs (λ _, by rw sInter_empty; exact is_open_univ) $
λ a s has hs ih h, by rw sInter_insert; exact
is_open_inter (h _ $ mem_insert _ _) (ih $ λ t, h t ∘ mem_insert_of_mem _)
lemma is_open_bInter {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s) :
(∀i∈s, is_open (f i)) → is_open (⋂i∈s, f i) :=
finite.induction_on hs
(λ _, by rw bInter_empty; exact is_open_univ)
(λ a s has hs ih h, by rw bInter_insert; exact
is_open_inter (h a (mem_insert _ _)) (ih (λ i hi, h i (mem_insert_of_mem _ hi))))
lemma is_open_const {p : Prop} : is_open {a : α | p} :=
by_cases
(assume : p, begin simp only [this]; exact is_open_univ end)
(assume : ¬ p, begin simp only [this]; exact is_open_empty end)
lemma is_open_and : is_open {a | p₁ a} → is_open {a | p₂ a} → is_open {a | p₁ a ∧ p₂ a} :=
is_open_inter
/-- A set is closed if its complement is open -/
def is_closed (s : set α) : Prop := is_open (-s)
@[simp] lemma is_closed_empty : is_closed (∅ : set α) :=
by unfold is_closed; rw compl_empty; exact is_open_univ
@[simp] lemma is_closed_univ : is_closed (univ : set α) :=
by unfold is_closed; rw compl_univ; exact is_open_empty
lemma is_closed_union : is_closed s₁ → is_closed s₂ → is_closed (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
λ h₁ h₂, by unfold is_closed; rw compl_union; exact is_open_inter h₁ h₂
lemma is_closed_sInter {s : set (set α)} : (∀t ∈ s, is_closed t) → is_closed (⋂₀ s) :=
by simp only [is_closed, compl_sInter, sUnion_image]; exact assume h, is_open_Union $ assume t, is_open_Union $ assume ht, h t ht
lemma is_closed_Inter {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, is_closed (f i)) : is_closed (⋂i, f i ) :=
is_closed_sInter $ assume t ⟨i, (heq : f i = t)⟩, heq ▸ h i
@[simp] lemma is_open_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_open (-s) ↔ is_closed s := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma is_closed_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_closed (-s) ↔ is_open s :=
by rw [←is_open_compl_iff, compl_compl]
lemma is_open_diff {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_open s) (h₂ : is_closed t) : is_open (s \ t) :=
is_open_inter h₁ $ is_open_compl_iff.mpr h₂
lemma is_closed_inter (h₁ : is_closed s₁) (h₂ : is_closed s₂) : is_closed (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by rw [is_closed, compl_inter]; exact is_open_union h₁ h₂
lemma is_closed_Union {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s) :
(∀i∈s, is_closed (f i)) → is_closed (⋃i∈s, f i) :=
finite.induction_on hs
(λ _, by rw bUnion_empty; exact is_closed_empty)
(λ a s has hs ih h, by rw bUnion_insert; exact
is_closed_union (h a (mem_insert _ _)) (ih (λ i hi, h i (mem_insert_of_mem _ hi))))
lemma is_closed_imp {p q : α → Prop} (hp : is_open {x | p x})
(hq : is_closed {x | q x}) : is_closed {x | p x → q x} :=
have {x | p x → q x} = (- {x | p x}) ∪ {x | q x}, from set.ext $ λ x, imp_iff_not_or,
by rw [this]; exact is_closed_union (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr hp) hq
lemma is_open_neg : is_closed {a | p a} → is_open {a | ¬ p a} :=
is_open_compl_iff.mpr
/-- The interior of a set `s` is the largest open subset of `s`. -/
def interior (s : set α) : set α := ⋃₀ {t | is_open t ∧ t ⊆ s}
lemma mem_interior {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t :=
by simp only [interior, mem_set_of_eq, exists_prop, and_assoc, and.left_comm]
@[simp] lemma is_open_interior {s : set α} : is_open (interior s) :=
is_open_sUnion $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁
lemma interior_subset {s : set α} : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂
lemma interior_maximal {s t : set α} (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : is_open t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
lemma interior_eq_of_open {s : set α} (h : is_open s) : interior s = s :=
subset.antisymm interior_subset (interior_maximal (subset.refl s) h)
lemma interior_eq_iff_open {s : set α} : interior s = s ↔ is_open s :=
⟨assume h, h ▸ is_open_interior, interior_eq_of_open⟩
lemma subset_interior_iff_open {s : set α} : s ⊆ interior s ↔ is_open s :=
by simp only [interior_eq_iff_open.symm, subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
lemma subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_open s) :
s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h, subset.trans h interior_subset, assume h₂, interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
lemma interior_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (subset.trans interior_subset h) is_open_interior
@[simp] lemma interior_empty : interior (∅ : set α) = ∅ :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_empty
@[simp] lemma interior_univ : interior (univ : set α) = univ :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_univ
@[simp] lemma interior_interior {s : set α} : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_interior
@[simp] lemma interior_inter {s t : set α} : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
subset.antisymm
(subset_inter (interior_mono $ inter_subset_left s t) (interior_mono $ inter_subset_right s t))
(interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) $ is_open_inter is_open_interior is_open_interior)
lemma interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed s) (h₂ : interior t = ∅) :
interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s, from
assume x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : is_open u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩,
classical.by_contradiction $ assume hx₂ : x ∉ s,
have u \ s ⊆ t,
from assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂,
have u \ s ⊆ interior t,
by rwa subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open (is_open_diff hu₁ h₁),
have u \ s ⊆ ∅,
by rwa h₂ at this,
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩,
subset.antisymm
(interior_maximal this is_open_interior)
(interior_mono $ subset_union_left _ _)
lemma is_open_iff_forall_mem_open : is_open s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t :=
by rw ← subset_interior_iff_open; simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
/-- The closure of `s` is the smallest closed set containing `s`. -/
def closure (s : set α) : set α := ⋂₀ {t | is_closed t ∧ s ⊆ t}
@[simp] lemma is_closed_closure {s : set α} : is_closed (closure s) :=
is_closed_sInter $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁
lemma subset_closure {s : set α} : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂
lemma closure_minimal {s t : set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : is_closed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
lemma closure_eq_of_is_closed {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) : closure s = s :=
subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
lemma closure_eq_iff_is_closed {s : set α} : closure s = s ↔ is_closed s :=
⟨assume h, h ▸ is_closed_closure, closure_eq_of_is_closed⟩
lemma closure_subset_iff_subset_of_is_closed {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed t) :
closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨subset.trans subset_closure, assume h, closure_minimal h h₁⟩
lemma closure_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (subset.trans h subset_closure) is_closed_closure
lemma is_closed_of_closure_subset {s : set α} (h : closure s ⊆ s) : is_closed s :=
by rw subset.antisymm subset_closure h; exact is_closed_closure
@[simp] lemma closure_empty : closure (∅ : set α) = ∅ :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_empty
lemma closure_empty_iff (s : set α) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
intros x H,
simpa only [h] using subset_closure H },
{ exact (eq.symm h) ▸ closure_empty },
end
@[simp] lemma closure_univ : closure (univ : set α) = univ :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_univ
@[simp] lemma closure_closure {s : set α} : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_closure
@[simp] lemma closure_union {s t : set α} : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t :=
subset.antisymm
(closure_minimal (union_subset_union subset_closure subset_closure) $ is_closed_union is_closed_closure is_closed_closure)
(union_subset (closure_mono $ subset_union_left _ _) (closure_mono $ subset_union_right _ _))
lemma interior_subset_closure {s : set α} : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
lemma closure_eq_compl_interior_compl {s : set α} : closure s = - interior (- s) :=
begin
unfold interior closure is_closed,
rw [compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of],
simp only [compl_subset_compl]
end
@[simp] lemma interior_compl {s : set α} : interior (- s) = - closure s :=
by simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
@[simp] lemma closure_compl {s : set α} : closure (- s) = - interior s :=
by simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, is_open o → a ∈ o → o ∩ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨λ h o oo ao os,
have s ⊆ -o, from λ x xs xo, @ne_empty_of_mem α (o∩s) x ⟨xo, xs⟩ os,
closure_minimal this (is_closed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
λ H c ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, classical.by_contradiction $ λ nc,
let ⟨x, hc, hs⟩ := exists_mem_of_ne_empty (H _ h₁ nc) in hc (h₂ hs)⟩
lemma dense_iff_inter_open {s : set α} : closure s = univ ↔ ∀ U, is_open U → U ≠ ∅ → U ∩ s ≠ ∅ :=
begin
split ; intro h,
{ intros U U_op U_ne,
cases exists_mem_of_ne_empty U_ne with x x_in,
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (by simp only [h]) U U_op x_in },
{ apply eq_univ_of_forall, intro x,
rw mem_closure_iff,
intros U U_op x_in,
exact h U U_op (ne_empty_of_mem x_in) },
end
/-- The frontier of a set is the set of points between the closure and interior. -/
def frontier (s : set α) : set α := closure s \ interior s
lemma frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure {s : set α} :
frontier s = closure s ∩ closure (- s) :=
by rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
@[simp] lemma frontier_compl (s : set α) : frontier (-s) = frontier s :=
by simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, lattice.neg_neg, inter_comm]
/-- neighbourhood filter -/
def nhds (a : α) : filter α := (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, principal s)
lemma nhds_sets {a : α} : (nhds a).sets = {s | ∃t⊆s, is_open t ∧ a ∈ t} :=
calc (nhds a).sets = (⋃s∈{s : set α| a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, (principal s).sets) : infi_sets_eq'
(assume x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩,
⟨x ∩ y, ⟨⟨hx₁, hy₁⟩, is_open_inter hx₂ hy₂⟩,
le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_left _ _),
le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_right _ _)⟩)
⟨univ, mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩
... = {s | ∃t⊆s, is_open t ∧ a ∈ t} :
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume ⟨hi₁, hi₂⟩ t ht, ⟨i, ht, hi₂, hi₁⟩)
(assume t ⟨i, hi₁, hi₂, hi₃⟩, mem_Union.2 ⟨i, mem_Union.2 ⟨⟨hi₃, hi₂⟩, hi₁⟩⟩)
lemma map_nhds {a : α} {f : α → β} :
map f (nhds a) = (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, principal (image f s)) :=
calc map f (nhds a) = (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, map f (principal s)) :
map_binfi_eq
(assume x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩,
⟨x ∩ y, ⟨⟨hx₁, hy₁⟩, is_open_inter hx₂ hy₂⟩,
le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_left _ _),
le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_right _ _)⟩)
⟨univ, mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩
... = _ : by simp only [map_principal]
lemma mem_nhds_sets_iff {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ nhds a ↔ ∃t⊆s, is_open t ∧ a ∈ t :=
by simp only [nhds_sets, mem_set_of_eq, exists_prop]
lemma mem_of_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ nhds a → a ∈ s :=
λ H, let ⟨t, ht, _, hs⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.1 H in ht hs
lemma mem_nhds_sets {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
s ∈ nhds a :=
mem_nhds_sets_iff.2 ⟨s, subset.refl _, hs, ha⟩
theorem all_mem_nhds (x : α) (P : set α → Prop) (hP : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ nhds x, P s) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → x ∈ s → P s) :=
iff.intro
(λ h s os xs, h s (mem_nhds_sets os xs))
(λ h t,
begin
change t ∈ (nhds x).sets → P t,
rw nhds_sets,
rintros ⟨s, hs, opens, xs⟩,
exact hP _ _ hs (h s opens xs),
end)
theorem all_mem_nhds_filter (x : α) (f : set α → set β) (hf : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → f s ⊆ f t)
(l : filter β) :
(∀ s ∈ nhds x, f s ∈ l) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → x ∈ s → f s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds _ _ (λ s t ssubt h, mem_sets_of_superset h (hf s t ssubt))
theorem rtendsto_nhds {r : rel β α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
rtendsto r l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → r.core s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (λ s t h, λ x hx, λ y hy, h (hx y hy)) _
theorem rtendsto'_nhds {r : rel β α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
rtendsto' r l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → r.preimage s ∈ l) :=
by { rw [rtendsto'_def], apply all_mem_nhds_filter, apply rel.preimage_mono }
theorem ptendsto_nhds {f : β →. α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
ptendsto f l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f.core s ∈ l) :=
rtendsto_nhds
theorem ptendsto'_nhds {f : β →. α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
ptendsto' f l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f.preimage s ∈ l) :=
rtendsto'_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
tendsto f l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f ⁻¹' s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (λ s t h, preimage_mono h) _
lemma tendsto_const_nhds {a : α} {f : filter β} : tendsto (λb:β, a) f (nhds a) :=
tendsto_nhds.mpr $ assume s hs ha, univ_mem_sets' $ assume _, ha
lemma pure_le_nhds : pure ≤ (nhds : α → filter α) :=
assume a, le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume ⟨h₁, _⟩, principal_mono.mpr $
singleton_subset_iff.2 h₁
lemma tendsto_pure_nhds [topological_space β] (f : α → β) (a : α) :
tendsto f (pure a) (nhds (f a)) :=
begin
rw [tendsto, filter.map_pure],
exact pure_le_nhds (f a)
end
@[simp] lemma nhds_neq_bot {a : α} : nhds a ≠ ⊥ :=
assume : nhds a = ⊥,
have pure a = (⊥ : filter α),
from lattice.bot_unique $ this ▸ pure_le_nhds a,
pure_neq_bot this
lemma interior_eq_nhds {s : set α} : interior s = {a | nhds a ≤ principal s} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_interior, le_principal_iff, mem_nhds_sets_iff]; refl
lemma mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ interior s ↔ s ∈ nhds a :=
by simp only [interior_eq_nhds, le_principal_iff]; refl
lemma is_open_iff_nhds {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀a∈s, nhds a ≤ principal s :=
calc is_open s ↔ s ⊆ interior s : subset_interior_iff_open.symm
... ↔ (∀a∈s, nhds a ≤ principal s) : by rw [interior_eq_nhds]; refl
lemma is_open_iff_mem_nhds {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀a∈s, s ∈ nhds a :=
is_open_iff_nhds.trans $ forall_congr $ λ _, imp_congr_right $ λ _, le_principal_iff
lemma closure_eq_nhds {s : set α} : closure s = {a | nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥} :=
calc closure s = - interior (- s) : closure_eq_compl_interior_compl
... = {a | ¬ nhds a ≤ principal (-s)} : by rw [interior_eq_nhds]; refl
... = {a | nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥} : set.ext $ assume a, not_congr
(inf_eq_bot_iff_le_compl
(show principal s ⊔ principal (-s) = ⊤, by simp only [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ])
(by simp only [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty])).symm
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ nhds a, t ∩ s ≠ ∅ :=
mem_closure_iff.trans
⟨λ H t ht, subset_ne_empty
(inter_subset_inter_left _ interior_subset)
(H _ is_open_interior (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 ht)),
λ H o oo ao, H _ (mem_nhds_sets oo ao)⟩
/-- `x` belongs to the closure of `s` if and only if some ultrafilter
supported on `s` converges to `x`. -/
lemma mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ (u : ultrafilter α), s ∈ u.val ∧ u.val ≤ nhds x :=
begin
rw closure_eq_nhds, change nhds x ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ ↔ _, symmetry,
convert exists_ultrafilter_iff _, ext u,
rw [←le_principal_iff, inf_comm, le_inf_iff]
end
lemma is_closed_iff_nhds {s : set α} : is_closed s ↔ ∀a, nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → a ∈ s :=
calc is_closed s ↔ closure s = s : by rw [closure_eq_iff_is_closed]
... ↔ closure s ⊆ s : ⟨assume h, by rw h, assume h, subset.antisymm h subset_closure⟩
... ↔ (∀a, nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → a ∈ s) : by rw [closure_eq_nhds]; refl
lemma closure_inter_open {s t : set α} (h : is_open s) : s ∩ closure t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) :=
assume a ⟨hs, ht⟩,
have s ∈ nhds a, from mem_nhds_sets h hs,
have nhds a ⊓ principal s = nhds a, from inf_of_le_left $ by rwa le_principal_iff,
have nhds a ⊓ principal (s ∩ t) ≠ ⊥,
from calc nhds a ⊓ principal (s ∩ t) = nhds a ⊓ (principal s ⊓ principal t) : by rw inf_principal
... = nhds a ⊓ principal t : by rw [←inf_assoc, this]
... ≠ ⊥ : by rw [closure_eq_nhds] at ht; assumption,
by rw [closure_eq_nhds]; assumption
lemma closure_diff {s t : set α} : closure s - closure t ⊆ closure (s - t) :=
calc closure s \ closure t = (- closure t) ∩ closure s : by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
... ⊆ closure (- closure t ∩ s) : closure_inter_open $ is_open_compl_iff.mpr $ is_closed_closure
... = closure (s \ closure t) : by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
... ⊆ closure (s \ t) : closure_mono $ diff_subset_diff (subset.refl s) subset_closure
lemma mem_of_closed_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hf : tendsto f b (nhds a)) (hs : is_closed s) (h : f ⁻¹' s ∈ b) : a ∈ s :=
have b.map f ≤ nhds a ⊓ principal s,
from le_trans (le_inf (le_refl _) (le_principal_iff.mpr h)) (inf_le_inf hf (le_refl _)),
is_closed_iff_nhds.mp hs a $ neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot (map_ne_bot hb) this
lemma mem_of_closed_of_tendsto' {f : β → α} {x : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hf : tendsto f x (nhds a)) (hs : is_closed s) (h : x ⊓ principal (f ⁻¹' s) ≠ ⊥) : a ∈ s :=
is_closed_iff_nhds.mp hs _ $ neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot (@map_ne_bot _ _ _ f h) $
le_inf (le_trans (map_mono $ inf_le_left) hf) $
le_trans (map_mono $ inf_le_right_of_le $ by simp only [comap_principal, le_principal_iff]; exact subset.refl _) (@map_comap_le _ _ _ f)
lemma mem_closure_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hf : tendsto f b (nhds a)) (h : f ⁻¹' s ∈ b) : a ∈ closure s :=
mem_of_closed_of_tendsto hb hf (is_closed_closure) $
filter.mem_sets_of_superset h (preimage_mono subset_closure)
section lim
variables [inhabited α]
/-- If `f` is a filter, then `lim f` is a limit of the filter, if it exists. -/
noncomputable def lim (f : filter α) : α := epsilon $ λa, f ≤ nhds a
lemma lim_spec {f : filter α} (h : ∃a, f ≤ nhds a) : f ≤ nhds (lim f) := epsilon_spec h
end lim
/-
The nhds_within filter.
-/
def nhds_within (a : α) (s : set α) : filter α := nhds a ⊓ principal s
theorem nhds_within_eq (a : α) (s : set α) :
nhds_within a s = ⨅ t ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}, principal (t ∩ s) :=
have set.univ ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, from ⟨set.mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩,
begin
rw [nhds_within, nhds, lattice.binfi_inf]; try { exact this },
simp only [inf_principal]
end
theorem nhds_within_univ (a : α) : nhds_within a set.univ = nhds a :=
by rw [nhds_within, principal_univ, lattice.inf_top_eq]
theorem mem_nhds_within (t : set α) (a : α) (s : set α) :
t ∈ nhds_within a s ↔ ∃ u, is_open u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
begin
rw [nhds_within, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_sets_iff], split,
{ rintros ⟨u, hu, openu, au⟩,
exact ⟨u, openu, au, λ x ⟨xu, xs⟩, hu xu xs⟩ },
rintros ⟨u, openu, au, hu⟩,
exact ⟨u, λ x xu xs, hu ⟨xu, xs⟩, openu, au⟩
end
theorem nhds_within_mono (a : α) {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : nhds_within a s ≤ nhds_within a t :=
lattice.inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (principal_mono.mpr h)
theorem nhds_within_restrict {a : α} (s : set α) {t : set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : is_open t) :
nhds_within a s = nhds_within a (s ∩ t) :=
have s ∩ t ∈ nhds_within a s,
from inter_mem_sets (mem_inf_sets_of_right (mem_principal_self s))
(mem_inf_sets_of_left (mem_nhds_sets h₁ h₀)),
le_antisymm
(lattice.le_inf lattice.inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr this))
(lattice.inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (principal_mono.mpr (set.inter_subset_left _ _)))
theorem nhds_within_eq_nhds_within {a : α} {s t u : set α}
(h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : is_open s) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
nhds_within a t = nhds_within a u :=
by rw [nhds_within_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhds_within_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
theorem nhs_within_eq_of_open {a : α} {s : set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : is_open s) :
nhds_within a s = nhds a :=
by rw [←nhds_within_univ]; apply nhds_within_eq_nhds_within h₀ h₁;
rw [set.univ_inter, set.inter_self]
@[simp] theorem nhds_within_empty (a : α) : nhds_within a {} = ⊥ :=
by rw [nhds_within, principal_empty, lattice.inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhds_within_union (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∪ t) = nhds_within a s ⊔ nhds_within a t :=
by unfold nhds_within; rw [←lattice.inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_within_inter (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∩ t) = nhds_within a s ⊓ nhds_within a t :=
by unfold nhds_within; rw [lattice.inf_left_comm, lattice.inf_assoc, inf_principal,
←lattice.inf_assoc, lattice.inf_idem]
theorem nhds_within_inter' (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∩ t) = (nhds_within a s) ⊓ principal t :=
by { unfold nhds_within, rw [←inf_principal, lattice.inf_assoc] }
theorem tendsto_if_nhds_within {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter β}
(h₀ : tendsto f (nhds_within a (s ∩ p)) l)
(h₁ : tendsto g (nhds_within a (s ∩ {x | ¬ p x})) l) :
tendsto (λ x, if p x then f x else g x) (nhds_within a s) l :=
by apply tendsto_if; rw [←nhds_within_inter']; assumption
lemma map_nhds_within (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : set α) :
map f (nhds_within a s) =
⨅ t ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}, principal (set.image f (t ∩ s)) :=
have h₀ : directed_on ((λ (i : set α), principal (i ∩ s)) ⁻¹'o ge)
{x : set α | x ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}}, from
assume x ⟨ax, openx⟩ y ⟨ay, openy⟩,
⟨x ∩ y, ⟨⟨ax, ay⟩, is_open_inter openx openy⟩,
le_principal_iff.mpr (set.inter_subset_inter_left _ (set.inter_subset_left _ _)),
le_principal_iff.mpr (set.inter_subset_inter_left _ (set.inter_subset_right _ _))⟩,
have h₁ : ∃ (i : set α), i ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t},
from ⟨set.univ, set.mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩,
by { rw [nhds_within_eq, map_binfi_eq h₀ h₁], simp only [map_principal] }
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α}
{s t : set α} {l : filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : tendsto f (nhds_within a t) l) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l :=
tendsto_le_left (nhds_within_mono a hst) h
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : filter β}
{a : α} {s t : set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : tendsto f l (nhds_within a s)) :
tendsto f l (nhds_within a t) :=
tendsto_le_right (nhds_within_mono a hst) h
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α}
{s : set α} {l : filter β} (h : tendsto f (nhds a) l) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l :=
by rw [←nhds_within_univ] at h; exact tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left (set.subset_univ _) h
/- locally finite family [General Topology (Bourbaki, 1995)] -/
section locally_finite
/-- A family of sets in `set α` is locally finite if at every point `x:α`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` which meets only finitely many sets in the family -/
def locally_finite (f : β → set α) :=
∀x:α, ∃t ∈ nhds x, finite {i | f i ∩ t ≠ ∅ }
lemma locally_finite_of_finite {f : β → set α} (h : finite (univ : set β)) : locally_finite f :=
assume x, ⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, finite_subset h $ subset_univ _⟩
lemma locally_finite_subset
{f₁ f₂ : β → set α} (hf₂ : locally_finite f₂) (hf : ∀b, f₁ b ⊆ f₂ b) : locally_finite f₁ :=
assume a,
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := hf₂ a in
⟨t, ht₁, finite_subset ht₂ $ assume i hi,
neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot hi $ inter_subset_inter (hf i) $ subset.refl _⟩
lemma is_closed_Union_of_locally_finite {f : β → set α}
(h₁ : locally_finite f) (h₂ : ∀i, is_closed (f i)) : is_closed (⋃i, f i) :=
is_open_iff_nhds.mpr $ assume a, assume h : a ∉ (⋃i, f i),
have ∀i, a ∈ -f i,
from assume i hi, h $ mem_Union.2 ⟨i, hi⟩,
have ∀i, - f i ∈ (nhds a).sets,
by rw [nhds_sets]; exact assume i, ⟨- f i, subset.refl _, h₂ i, this i⟩,
let ⟨t, h_sets, (h_fin : finite {i | f i ∩ t ≠ ∅ })⟩ := h₁ a in
calc nhds a ≤ principal (t ∩ (⋂ i∈{i | f i ∩ t ≠ ∅ }, - f i)) :
begin
rw [le_principal_iff],
apply @filter.inter_mem_sets _ (nhds a) _ _ h_sets,
apply @filter.Inter_mem_sets _ (nhds a) _ _ _ h_fin,
exact assume i h, this i
end
... ≤ principal (- ⋃i, f i) :
begin
simp only [principal_mono, subset_def, mem_compl_eq, mem_inter_eq,
mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq, mem_Union, and_imp, not_exists,
not_eq_empty_iff_exists, exists_imp_distrib, (≠)],
exact assume x xt ht i xfi, ht i x xfi xt xfi
end
end locally_finite
end topological_space
section continuous
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous if the preimage
of every open set is open. -/
def continuous (f : α → β) := ∀s, is_open s → is_open (f ⁻¹' s)
def continuous_at (f : α → β) (x : α) := tendsto f (nhds x) (nhds (f x))
def continuous_at_within (f : α → β) (x : α) (s : set α) : Prop :=
tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (nhds (f x))
def continuous_on (f : α → β) (s : set α) : Prop := ∀ x ∈ s, continuous_at_within f x s
lemma continuous_id : continuous (id : α → α) :=
assume s h, h
lemma continuous.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (g ∘ f) :=
assume s h, hf _ (hg s h)
lemma continuous.tendsto {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (x) :
tendsto f (nhds x) (nhds (f x)) | s :=
show s ∈ nhds (f x) → s ∈ map f (nhds x),
by simp [nhds_sets]; exact
assume t t_subset t_open fx_in_t,
⟨f ⁻¹' t, preimage_mono t_subset, hf t t_open, fx_in_t⟩
lemma continuous_iff_continuous_at {f : α → β} : continuous f ↔ ∀ x, continuous_at f x :=
⟨continuous.tendsto,
assume hf : ∀x, tendsto f (nhds x) (nhds (f x)),
assume s, assume hs : is_open s,
have ∀a, f a ∈ s → s ∈ nhds (f a),
by simp [nhds_sets]; exact assume a ha, ⟨s, subset.refl s, hs, ha⟩,
show is_open (f ⁻¹' s),
by simp [is_open_iff_nhds]; exact assume a ha, hf a (this a ha)⟩
lemma continuous_const {b : β} : continuous (λa:α, b) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume a, tendsto_const_nhds
lemma continuous_iff_is_closed {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔ (∀s, is_closed s → is_closed (f ⁻¹' s)) :=
⟨assume hf s hs, hf (-s) hs,
assume hf s, by rw [←is_closed_compl_iff, ←is_closed_compl_iff]; exact hf _⟩
lemma continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter {f : α → β} (x) : continuous_at f x ↔
∀ g, is_ultrafilter g → g ≤ nhds x → g.map f ≤ nhds (f x) :=
tendsto_iff_ultrafilter f (nhds x) (nhds (f x))
lemma continuous_iff_ultrafilter {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔ ∀ x g, is_ultrafilter g → g ≤ nhds x → g.map f ≤ nhds (f x) :=
by simp only [continuous_iff_continuous_at, continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter]
lemma continuous_if {p : α → Prop} {f g : α → β} {h : ∀a, decidable (p a)}
(hp : ∀a∈frontier {a | p a}, f a = g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
continuous (λa, @ite (p a) (h a) β (f a) (g a)) :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.mpr $
assume s hs,
have (λa, ite (p a) (f a) (g a)) ⁻¹' s =
(closure {a | p a} ∩ f ⁻¹' s) ∪ (closure {a | ¬ p a} ∩ g ⁻¹' s),
from set.ext $ assume a,
classical.by_cases
(assume : a ∈ frontier {a | p a},
have hac : a ∈ closure {a | p a}, from this.left,
have hai : a ∈ closure {a | ¬ p a},
from have a ∈ - interior {a | p a}, from this.right, by rwa [←closure_compl] at this,
by by_cases p a; simp [h, hp a this, hac, hai, iff_def] {contextual := tt})
(assume hf : a ∈ - frontier {a | p a},
classical.by_cases
(assume : p a,
have hc : a ∈ closure {a | p a}, from subset_closure this,
have hnc : a ∉ closure {a | ¬ p a},
by show a ∉ closure (- {a | p a}); rw [closure_compl]; simpa [frontier, hc] using hf,
by simp [this, hc, hnc])
(assume : ¬ p a,
have hc : a ∈ closure {a | ¬ p a}, from subset_closure this,
have hnc : a ∉ closure {a | p a},
begin
have hc : a ∈ closure (- {a | p a}), from hc,
simp [closure_compl] at hc,
simpa [frontier, hc] using hf
end,
by simp [this, hc, hnc])),
by rw [this]; exact is_closed_union
(is_closed_inter is_closed_closure $ continuous_iff_is_closed.mp hf s hs)
(is_closed_inter is_closed_closure $ continuous_iff_is_closed.mp hg s hs)
/- Continuity and partial functions -/
def pcontinuous (f : α →. β) := ∀ s, is_open s → is_open (f.preimage s)
lemma open_dom_of_pcontinuous {f : α →. β} (h : pcontinuous f) : is_open f.dom :=
by rw [←pfun.preimage_univ]; exact h _ is_open_univ
lemma pcontinuous_iff' {f : α →. β} :
pcontinuous f ↔ ∀ {x y} (h : y ∈ f x), ptendsto' f (nhds x) (nhds y) :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x y h',
rw [ptendsto'_def],
change ∀ (s : set β), s ∈ (nhds y).sets → pfun.preimage f s ∈ (nhds x).sets,
rw [nhds_sets, nhds_sets],
rintros s ⟨t, tsubs, opent, yt⟩,
exact ⟨f.preimage t, pfun.preimage_mono _ tsubs, h _ opent, ⟨y, yt, h'⟩⟩
},
intros hf s os,
rw is_open_iff_nhds,
rintros x ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩ t,
rw [mem_principal_sets],
assume h : f.preimage s ⊆ t,
change t ∈ nhds x,
apply mem_sets_of_superset _ h,
have h' : ∀ s ∈ nhds y, f.preimage s ∈ nhds x,
{ intros s hs,
have : ptendsto' f (nhds x) (nhds y) := hf fxy,
rw ptendsto'_def at this,
exact this s hs },
show f.preimage s ∈ nhds x,
apply h', rw mem_nhds_sets_iff, exact ⟨s, set.subset.refl _, os, ys⟩
end
lemma image_closure_subset_closure_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous f) :
f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
have ∀ (a : α), nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → nhds (f a) ⊓ principal (f '' s) ≠ ⊥,
from assume a ha,
have h₁ : ¬ map f (nhds a ⊓ principal s) = ⊥,
by rwa[map_eq_bot_iff],
have h₂ : map f (nhds a ⊓ principal s) ≤ nhds (f a) ⊓ principal (f '' s),
from le_inf
(le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) $ by rw [continuous_iff_continuous_at] at h; exact h a)
(le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) $ by simp; exact subset.refl _),
neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot h₁ h₂,
by simp [image_subset_iff, closure_eq_nhds]; assumption
lemma mem_closure [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
{s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} {a : α}
(hf : continuous f) (ha : a ∈ closure s) (ht : ∀a∈s, f a ∈ t) : f a ∈ closure t :=
subset.trans (image_closure_subset_closure_image hf) (closure_mono $ image_subset_iff.2 ht) $
(mem_image_of_mem f ha)
end continuous
|
87a3a69ca657525e59a3993b2f83280cd5fc1467 | ed2fefcfa8b4fe534e01e6245f2696fd7c890d95 | /recursaoPrimitiva.lean | eba8b04d5614169dcbdfebf23398ef01354e92b5 | [] | no_license | Bpalkmim/EstOrientadoLean | 2036194e2211badb8ae18c1440edfe557b8e11d2 | 05a11f20cb5d0da612c9767fd97d0dbf698a405a | refs/heads/master | 1,588,562,078,354 | 1,557,777,940,000 | 1,557,777,940,000 | 178,943,165 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 489 | lean | inductive Nat
| z : Nat
| suc : Nat → Nat
def natrec {C : Type} : C → (Nat → C → C) → Nat → C
| g h Nat.z := g
| g h (Nat.suc n) := h n (natrec g h n)
def add : Nat → Nat → Nat
:= λ n m, natrec m (λ x y, Nat.suc y) n
def mul : Nat → Nat → Nat
:= λ n m, natrec Nat.z (λ x y, add y m) n
#reduce add (Nat.suc Nat.z) (Nat.suc (Nat.suc Nat.z))
#reduce mul (Nat.suc (Nat.suc (Nat.suc Nat.z))) (Nat.suc Nat.z)
#reduce mul (Nat.suc (Nat.suc (Nat.suc Nat.z))) Nat.z |
e413030d52271936f3208ea63e26c8cc56e3fa84 | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/analysis/convex/caratheodory.lean | 9427ba7bee049a19a01317d82150a749ce164656 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,633 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Scott Morrison
-/
import analysis.convex.basic
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
/-!
# Carathéodory's convexity theorem
This file is devoted to proving Carathéodory's convexity theorem:
The convex hull of a set `s` in ℝᵈ is the union of the convex hulls of the (d+1)-tuples in `s`.
## Main results:
* `convex_hull_eq_union`: Carathéodory's convexity theorem
## Implementation details
This theorem was formalized as part of the Sphere Eversion project.
## Tags
convex hull, caratheodory
-/
universes u
open set finset finite_dimensional
open_locale big_operators
variables {E : Type u} [add_comm_group E] [vector_space ℝ E] [finite_dimensional ℝ E]
namespace caratheodory
/--
If `x` is in the convex hull of some finset `t` with strictly more than `findim + 1` elements,
then it is in the union of the convex hulls of the finsets `t.erase y` for `y ∈ t`.
-/
lemma mem_convex_hull_erase [decidable_eq E] {t : finset E} (h : findim ℝ E + 1 < t.card)
{x : E} (m : x ∈ convex_hull (↑t : set E)) :
∃ (y : (↑t : set E)), x ∈ convex_hull (↑(t.erase y) : set E) :=
begin
simp only [finset.convex_hull_eq, mem_set_of_eq] at m ⊢,
obtain ⟨f, fpos, fsum, rfl⟩ := m,
obtain ⟨g, gcombo, gsum, gpos⟩ := exists_relation_sum_zero_pos_coefficient_of_dim_succ_lt_card h,
clear h,
let s := t.filter (λ z : E, 0 < g z),
obtain ⟨i₀, mem, w⟩ : ∃ i₀ ∈ s, ∀ i ∈ s, f i₀ / g i₀ ≤ f i / g i,
{ apply s.exists_min_image (λ z, f z / g z),
obtain ⟨x, hx, hgx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ t, 0 < g x := gpos,
exact ⟨x, mem_filter.mpr ⟨hx, hgx⟩⟩, },
have hg : 0 < g i₀ := by { rw mem_filter at mem, exact mem.2 },
have hi₀ : i₀ ∈ t := filter_subset _ mem,
let k : E → ℝ := λ z, f z - (f i₀ / g i₀) * g z,
have hk : k i₀ = 0 := by field_simp [k, ne_of_gt hg],
have ksum : ∑ e in t.erase i₀, k e = 1,
{ calc ∑ e in t.erase i₀, k e = ∑ e in t, k e :
by conv_rhs { rw [← insert_erase hi₀, sum_insert (not_mem_erase i₀ t), hk, zero_add], }
... = ∑ e in t, (f e - f i₀ / g i₀ * g e) : rfl
... = 1 : by rw [sum_sub_distrib, fsum, ← mul_sum, gsum, mul_zero, sub_zero] },
refine ⟨⟨i₀, hi₀⟩, k, _, ksum, _⟩,
{ simp only [and_imp, sub_nonneg, mem_erase, ne.def, subtype.coe_mk],
intros e hei₀ het,
by_cases hes : e ∈ s,
{ have hge : 0 < g e := by { rw mem_filter at hes, exact hes.2 },
rw ← le_div_iff hge,
exact w _ hes, },
{ calc _ ≤ 0 : mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos _ _ -- prove two goals below
... ≤ f e : fpos e het,
{ apply div_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos (fpos i₀ (mem_of_subset (filter_subset t) mem)) hg },
{ simpa only [mem_filter, het, true_and, not_lt] using hes }, } },
{ simp only [subtype.coe_mk, center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 _ id ksum, id],
calc ∑ e in t.erase i₀, k e • e = ∑ e in t, k e • e :
by conv_rhs { rw [← insert_erase hi₀, sum_insert (not_mem_erase i₀ t), hk, zero_smul, zero_add], }
... = ∑ e in t, (f e - f i₀ / g i₀ * g e) • e : rfl
... = t.center_mass f id : _,
simp only [sub_smul, mul_smul, sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sum, gcombo, smul_zero,
sub_zero, center_mass, fsum, inv_one, one_smul, id.def], },
end
/--
The convex hull of a finset `t` with `findim ℝ E + 1 < t.card` is equal to
the union of the convex hulls of the finsets `t.erase x` for `x ∈ t`.
-/
lemma step [decidable_eq E] (t : finset E) (h : findim ℝ E + 1 < t.card) :
convex_hull (↑t : set E) = ⋃ (x : (↑t : set E)), convex_hull ↑(t.erase x) :=
begin
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ intros x m',
obtain ⟨y, m⟩ := mem_convex_hull_erase h m',
exact mem_Union.2 ⟨y, m⟩, },
{ refine Union_subset _,
intro x,
apply convex_hull_mono,
apply erase_subset, }
end
/--
The convex hull of a finset `t` with `findim ℝ E + 1 < t.card` is contained in
the union of the convex hulls of the finsets `t' ⊆ t` with `t'.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1`.
-/
lemma shrink' (t : finset E) (k : ℕ) (h : t.card = findim ℝ E + 1 + k) :
convex_hull (↑t : set E) ⊆
⋃ (t' : finset E) (w : t' ⊆ t) (b : t'.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1), convex_hull ↑t' :=
begin
induction k with k ih generalizing t,
{ apply subset_subset_Union t,
apply subset_subset_Union (set.subset.refl _),
exact subset_subset_Union (le_of_eq h) (subset.refl _), },
{ classical,
rw step _ (by { rw h, simp, } : findim ℝ E + 1 < t.card),
apply Union_subset,
intro i,
transitivity,
{ apply ih,
rw [card_erase_of_mem, h, nat.pred_succ],
exact i.2, },
{ apply Union_subset_Union,
intro t',
apply Union_subset_Union_const,
exact λ h, set.subset.trans h (erase_subset _ _), } }
end
/--
The convex hull of any finset `t` is contained in
the union of the convex hulls of the finsets `t' ⊆ t` with `t'.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1`.
-/
lemma shrink (t : finset E) :
convex_hull (↑t : set E) ⊆
⋃ (t' : finset E) (w : t' ⊆ t) (b : t'.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1), convex_hull ↑t' :=
begin
by_cases h : t.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1,
{ apply subset_subset_Union t,
apply subset_subset_Union (set.subset.refl _),
exact subset_subset_Union h (set.subset.refl _), },
push_neg at h,
obtain ⟨k, w⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp (le_of_lt h), clear h,
exact shrink' _ _ w,
end
end caratheodory
/--
One inclusion of Carathéodory's convexity theorem.
The convex hull of a set `s` in ℝᵈ is contained in
the union of the convex hulls of the (d+1)-tuples in `s`.
-/
lemma convex_hull_subset_union (s : set E) :
convex_hull s ⊆ ⋃ (t : finset E) (w : ↑t ⊆ s) (b : t.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1), convex_hull ↑t :=
begin
-- First we replace `convex_hull s` with the union of the convex hulls of finite subsets,
rw convex_hull_eq_union_convex_hull_finite_subsets,
-- and prove the inclusion for each of those.
apply Union_subset, intro r,
apply Union_subset, intro h,
-- Second, for each convex hull of a finite subset, we shrink it.
transitivity,
{ apply caratheodory.shrink, },
{ -- After that it's just shuffling unions around.
apply Union_subset, intro t,
apply Union_subset, intro htr,
apply Union_subset, intro ht,
apply set.subset_subset_Union t,
apply set.subset_subset_Union (subset.trans htr h),
exact subset_Union _ ht, },
end
/--
Carathéodory's convexity theorem.
The convex hull of a set `s` in ℝᵈ is the union of the convex hulls of the (d+1)-tuples in `s`.
-/
theorem convex_hull_eq_union (s : set E) :
convex_hull s = ⋃ (t : finset E) (w : ↑t ⊆ s) (b : t.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1), convex_hull ↑t :=
begin
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{ apply convex_hull_subset_union, },
iterate 3 { convert Union_subset _, intro, },
exact convex_hull_mono ‹_›,
end
/--
A more explicit formulation of Carathéodory's convexity theorem,
writing an element of a convex hull as the center of mass
of an explicit `finset` with cardinality at most `dim + 1`.
-/
theorem eq_center_mass_card_le_dim_succ_of_mem_convex_hull
{s : set E} {x : E} (h : x ∈ convex_hull s) :
∃ (t : finset E) (w : ↑t ⊆ s) (b : t.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1)
(f : E → ℝ), (∀ y ∈ t, 0 ≤ f y) ∧ t.sum f = 1 ∧ t.center_mass f id = x :=
begin
rw convex_hull_eq_union at h,
simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union] at h,
obtain ⟨t, w, b, m⟩ := h,
refine ⟨t, w, b, _⟩,
rw finset.convex_hull_eq at m,
simpa only [exists_prop] using m,
end
/--
A variation on Carathéodory's convexity theorem,
writing an element of a convex hull as a center of mass
of an explicit `finset` with cardinality at most `dim + 1`,
where all coefficients in the center of mass formula
are strictly positive.
(This is proved using `eq_center_mass_card_le_dim_succ_of_mem_convex_hull`,
and discarding any elements of the set with coefficient zero.)
-/
theorem eq_pos_center_mass_card_le_dim_succ_of_mem_convex_hull
{s : set E} {x : E} (h : x ∈ convex_hull s) :
∃ (t : finset E) (w : ↑t ⊆ s) (b : t.card ≤ findim ℝ E + 1)
(f : E → ℝ), (∀ y ∈ t, 0 < f y) ∧ t.sum f = 1 ∧ t.center_mass f id = x :=
begin
obtain ⟨t, w, b, f, ⟨pos, sum, center⟩⟩ := eq_center_mass_card_le_dim_succ_of_mem_convex_hull h,
let t' := t.filter (λ z, 0 < f z),
have t'sum : t'.sum f = 1,
{ convert sum using 1,
symmetry,
fapply sum_bij_ne_zero (λ z h w, z),
{ intros z m nz,
exact multiset.mem_filter_of_mem m (lt_of_le_of_ne (pos z m) (ne.symm nz)), },
{ intros _ _ _ _ _ _ a, exact a, },
{ intros z m nz,
exact ⟨z, mem_of_subset (filter_subset t) m, nz, rfl⟩, },
{ intros, refl, }, },
refine ⟨t', _, _, f, ⟨_, _, _⟩⟩,
{ exact subset.trans (filter_subset t) w, },
{ exact le_trans (card_le_of_subset (filter_subset t)) b, },
{ exact λ y H, (mem_filter.mp H).right, },
{ exact t'sum, },
{ convert center using 1,
symmetry,
simp only [center_mass, t'sum, sum, inv_one, one_smul, id.def],
fapply sum_bij_ne_zero (λ z h w, z),
{ intros z m nz,
have nz' : f z ≠ 0,
{ intro a, rw a at nz,
simpa using nz, },
exact multiset.mem_filter_of_mem m (lt_of_le_of_ne (pos z m) (ne.symm nz')), },
{ intros _ _ _ _ _ _ a, exact a, },
{ intros z m nz,
exact ⟨z, mem_of_subset (filter_subset t) m, nz, rfl⟩, },
{ intros, refl, }, },
end
|
b608706522dfa74a0eba60972fcd3fb94fdc39bd | 94935fb4ab68d4ce640296d02911624a93282575 | /src/solutions/thursday/afternoon/category_theory/exercise18.lean | f5ecfe1a2cef5ef57bbd945afbc969c419d2be54 | [] | permissive | marius-leonhardt/lftcm2020 | 41c0d7fe3457c1cf3b72cbb1c312b48fc94b85d2 | a3eb53f18d9be9a5be748dfe8fe74d0d31a0c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,623,789,936 | 1,594,710,949,000 | 1,594,710,949,000 | 279,514,936 | 0 | 0 | MIT | 1,594,711,916,000 | 1,594,711,916,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,718 | lean | import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks
/-!
Thanks to Markus Himmel for suggesting this question.
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
/-!
Let C be a category, X and Y be objects and f : X ⟶ Y be a morphism. Show that f is an epimorphism
if and only if the diagram
X --f--→ Y
| |
f 𝟙
| |
↓ ↓
Y --𝟙--→ Y
is a pushout.
-/
universes v u
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
def pushout_of_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [epi f] :
is_colimit (pushout_cocone.mk (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) rfl : pushout_cocone f f) :=
-- Hint: you can start a proof with `fapply pushout_cocone.is_colimit.mk`
-- to save a little bit of work over just building a `is_colimit` structure directly.
begin
fapply pushout_cocone.is_colimit.mk,
{ intro s,
apply s.ι.app walking_span.left, },
{ tidy, },
{ tidy,
apply (cancel_epi f).1,
have fst := s.ι.naturality walking_span.hom.fst,
simp at fst,
rw fst,
have snd := s.ι.naturality walking_span.hom.snd,
simp at snd,
rw snd, },
{ tidy, specialize w walking_span.left, tidy, }
end
theorem epi_of_pushout {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(is_colim : is_colimit (pushout_cocone.mk (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) rfl : pushout_cocone f f)) : epi f :=
{ left_cancellation := λ Z g h hf,
begin
let a := pushout_cocone.mk _ _ hf,
have hg : is_colim.desc a = g, {
have := is_colim.fac a walking_span.left,
simp at this,
dsimp at this,
simp at this,
exact this,
},
have hh : is_colim.desc a = h, {
have := is_colim.fac a walking_span.right,
simp at this,
dsimp at this,
simp at this,
exact this,
},
rw [←hg, ←hh],
end }
|
4e2849eca09fae5510dfba8246a8284e7688392b | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/measure_theory/measure/vector_measure.lean | 5ac7b7bfe75771e8ec9263de0e4764d8eb9d4f07 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 49,923 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import measure_theory.measure.measure_space
import analysis.complex.basic
/-!
# Vector valued measures
This file defines vector valued measures, which are σ-additive functions from a set to a add monoid
`M` such that it maps the empty set and non-measurable sets to zero. In the case
that `M = ℝ`, we called the vector measure a signed measure and write `signed_measure α`.
Similarly, when `M = ℂ`, we call the measure a complex measure and write `complex_measure α`.
## Main definitions
* `measure_theory.vector_measure` is a vector valued, σ-additive function that maps the empty
and non-measurable set to zero.
* `measure_theory.vector_measure.map` is the pushforward of a vector measure along a function.
* `measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict` is the restriction of a vector measure on some set.
## Notation
* `v ≤[i] w` means that the vector measure `v` restricted on the set `i` is less than or equal
to the vector measure `w` restricted on `i`, i.e. `v.restrict i ≤ w.restrict i`.
## Implementation notes
We require all non-measurable sets to be mapped to zero in order for the extensionality lemma
to only compare the underlying functions for measurable sets.
We use `has_sum` instead of `tsum` in the definition of vector measures in comparison to `measure`
since this provides summablity.
## Tags
vector measure, signed measure, complex measure
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal ennreal measure_theory
namespace measure_theory
variables {α β : Type*} {m : measurable_space α}
/-- A vector measure on a measurable space `α` is a σ-additive `M`-valued function (for some `M`
an add monoid) such that the empty set and non-measurable sets are mapped to zero. -/
structure vector_measure (α : Type*) [measurable_space α]
(M : Type*) [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M] :=
(measure_of' : set α → M)
(empty' : measure_of' ∅ = 0)
(not_measurable' ⦃i : set α⦄ : ¬ measurable_set i → measure_of' i = 0)
(m_Union' ⦃f : ℕ → set α⦄ :
(∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) → pairwise (disjoint on f) →
has_sum (λ i, measure_of' (f i)) (measure_of' (⋃ i, f i)))
/-- A `signed_measure` is a `ℝ`-vector measure. -/
abbreviation signed_measure (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] := vector_measure α ℝ
/-- A `complex_measure` is a `ℂ`-vector_measure. -/
abbreviation complex_measure (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] := vector_measure α ℂ
open set measure_theory
namespace vector_measure
section
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
include m
instance : has_coe_to_fun (vector_measure α M) (λ _, set α → M) :=
⟨vector_measure.measure_of'⟩
initialize_simps_projections vector_measure (measure_of' → apply)
@[simp]
lemma measure_of_eq_coe (v : vector_measure α M) : v.measure_of' = v := rfl
@[simp]
lemma empty (v : vector_measure α M) : v ∅ = 0 := v.empty'
lemma not_measurable (v : vector_measure α M)
{i : set α} (hi : ¬ measurable_set i) : v i = 0 := v.not_measurable' hi
lemma m_Union (v : vector_measure α M) {f : ℕ → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
has_sum (λ i, v (f i)) (v (⋃ i, f i)) :=
v.m_Union' hf₁ hf₂
lemma of_disjoint_Union_nat [t2_space M] (v : vector_measure α M) {f : ℕ → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
v (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, v (f i) :=
(v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂).tsum_eq.symm
lemma coe_injective : @function.injective (vector_measure α M) (set α → M) coe_fn :=
λ v w h, by { cases v, cases w, congr' }
lemma ext_iff' (v w : vector_measure α M) :
v = w ↔ ∀ i : set α, v i = w i :=
by rw [← coe_injective.eq_iff, function.funext_iff]
lemma ext_iff (v w : vector_measure α M) :
v = w ↔ ∀ i : set α, measurable_set i → v i = w i :=
begin
split,
{ rintro rfl _ _, refl },
{ rw ext_iff',
intros h i,
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ exact h i hi },
{ simp_rw [not_measurable _ hi] } }
end
@[ext] lemma ext {s t : vector_measure α M}
(h : ∀ i : set α, measurable_set i → s i = t i) : s = t :=
(ext_iff s t).2 h
variables [t2_space M] {v : vector_measure α M} {f : ℕ → set α}
lemma has_sum_of_disjoint_Union [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
has_sum (λ i, v (f i)) (v (⋃ i, f i)) :=
begin
set g := λ i : ℕ, ⋃ (b : β) (H : b ∈ encodable.decode₂ β i), f b with hg,
have hg₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (g i),
{ exact λ _, measurable_set.Union (λ b, measurable_set.Union_Prop $ λ _, hf₁ b) },
have hg₂ : pairwise (disjoint on g),
{ exact encodable.Union_decode₂_disjoint_on hf₂ },
have := v.of_disjoint_Union_nat hg₁ hg₂,
rw [hg, encodable.Union_decode₂] at this,
have hg₃ : (λ (i : β), v (f i)) = (λ i, v (g (encodable.encode i))),
{ ext, rw hg, simp only,
congr, ext y, simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, option.mem_def],
split,
{ intro hy,
refine ⟨x, (encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _).2 rfl, hy⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩,
rw (encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _) at hb₁,
rwa ← encodable.encode_injective hb₁ } },
rw [summable.has_sum_iff, this, ← tsum_Union_decode₂],
{ exact v.empty },
{ rw hg₃, change summable ((λ i, v (g i)) ∘ encodable.encode),
rw function.injective.summable_iff encodable.encode_injective,
{ exact (v.m_Union hg₁ hg₂).summable },
{ intros x hx,
convert v.empty,
simp only [Union_eq_empty, option.mem_def, not_exists, mem_range] at ⊢ hx,
intros i hi,
exact false.elim ((hx i) ((encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _).1 hi)) } }
end
lemma of_disjoint_Union [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
v (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, v (f i) :=
(has_sum_of_disjoint_Union hf₁ hf₂).tsum_eq.symm
lemma of_union {A B : set α}
(h : disjoint A B) (hA : measurable_set A) (hB : measurable_set B) :
v (A ∪ B) = v A + v B :=
begin
rw [union_eq_Union, of_disjoint_Union, tsum_fintype, fintype.sum_bool, cond, cond],
exacts [λ b, bool.cases_on b hB hA, pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 h]
end
lemma of_add_of_diff {A B : set α} (hA : measurable_set A) (hB : measurable_set B)
(h : A ⊆ B) : v A + v (B \ A) = v B :=
begin
rw [← of_union disjoint_diff hA (hB.diff hA), union_diff_cancel h],
apply_instance,
end
lemma of_diff {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M]
[topological_space M] [t2_space M] {v : vector_measure α M}
{A B : set α} (hA : measurable_set A) (hB : measurable_set B)
(h : A ⊆ B) : v (B \ A) = v B - (v A) :=
begin
rw [← of_add_of_diff hA hB h, add_sub_cancel'],
apply_instance,
end
lemma of_diff_of_diff_eq_zero {A B : set α}
(hA : measurable_set A) (hB : measurable_set B) (h' : v (B \ A) = 0) :
v (A \ B) + v B = v A :=
begin
symmetry,
calc v A = v (A \ B ∪ A ∩ B) : by simp only [set.diff_union_inter]
... = v (A \ B) + v (A ∩ B) :
by { rw of_union,
{ rw disjoint.comm,
exact set.disjoint_of_subset_left (A.inter_subset_right B) set.disjoint_diff },
{ exact hA.diff hB },
{ exact hA.inter hB } }
... = v (A \ B) + v (A ∩ B ∪ B \ A) :
by { rw [of_union, h', add_zero],
{ exact set.disjoint_of_subset_left (A.inter_subset_left B) set.disjoint_diff },
{ exact hA.inter hB },
{ exact hB.diff hA } }
... = v (A \ B) + v B :
by { rw [set.union_comm, set.inter_comm, set.diff_union_inter] }
end
lemma of_Union_nonneg {M : Type*} [topological_space M]
[ordered_add_comm_monoid M] [order_closed_topology M]
{v : vector_measure α M} (hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i))
(hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) (hf₃ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ v (f i)) :
0 ≤ v (⋃ i, f i) :=
(v.of_disjoint_Union_nat hf₁ hf₂).symm ▸ tsum_nonneg hf₃
lemma of_Union_nonpos {M : Type*} [topological_space M]
[ordered_add_comm_monoid M] [order_closed_topology M]
{v : vector_measure α M} (hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i))
(hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) (hf₃ : ∀ i, v (f i) ≤ 0) :
v (⋃ i, f i) ≤ 0 :=
(v.of_disjoint_Union_nat hf₁ hf₂).symm ▸ tsum_nonpos hf₃
lemma of_nonneg_disjoint_union_eq_zero {s : signed_measure α} {A B : set α}
(h : disjoint A B) (hA₁ : measurable_set A) (hB₁ : measurable_set B)
(hA₂ : 0 ≤ s A) (hB₂ : 0 ≤ s B)
(hAB : s (A ∪ B) = 0) : s A = 0 :=
begin
rw of_union h hA₁ hB₁ at hAB,
linarith,
apply_instance,
end
lemma of_nonpos_disjoint_union_eq_zero {s : signed_measure α} {A B : set α}
(h : disjoint A B) (hA₁ : measurable_set A) (hB₁ : measurable_set B)
(hA₂ : s A ≤ 0) (hB₂ : s B ≤ 0)
(hAB : s (A ∪ B) = 0) : s A = 0 :=
begin
rw of_union h hA₁ hB₁ at hAB,
linarith,
apply_instance,
end
end
section has_smul
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [distrib_mul_action R M] [has_continuous_const_smul R M]
include m
/-- Given a real number `r` and a signed measure `s`, `smul r s` is the signed
measure corresponding to the function `r • s`. -/
def smul (r : R) (v : vector_measure α M) : vector_measure α M :=
{ measure_of' := r • v,
empty' := by rw [pi.smul_apply, empty, smul_zero],
not_measurable' := λ _ hi, by rw [pi.smul_apply, v.not_measurable hi, smul_zero],
m_Union' := λ _ hf₁ hf₂, has_sum.const_smul (v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂) }
instance : has_smul R (vector_measure α M) := ⟨smul⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_smul (r : R) (v : vector_measure α M) : ⇑(r • v) = r • v := rfl
lemma smul_apply (r : R) (v : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :
(r • v) i = r • v i := rfl
end has_smul
section add_comm_monoid
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
include m
instance : has_zero (vector_measure α M) :=
⟨⟨0, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _ _, has_sum_zero⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (vector_measure α M) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : vector_measure α M) = 0 := rfl
lemma zero_apply (i : set α) : (0 : vector_measure α M) i = 0 := rfl
variables [has_continuous_add M]
/-- The sum of two vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def add (v w : vector_measure α M) : vector_measure α M :=
{ measure_of' := v + w,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ _ hi,
by simp [v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi],
m_Union' := λ f hf₁ hf₂,
has_sum.add (v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂) (w.m_Union hf₁ hf₂) }
instance : has_add (vector_measure α M) := ⟨add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_add (v w : vector_measure α M) : ⇑(v + w) = v + w := rfl
lemma add_apply (v w : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) : (v + w) i = v i + w i := rfl
instance : add_comm_monoid (vector_measure α M) :=
function.injective.add_comm_monoid _ coe_injective coe_zero coe_add (λ _ _, coe_smul _ _)
/-- `coe_fn` is an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def coe_fn_add_monoid_hom : vector_measure α M →+ (set α → M) :=
{ to_fun := coe_fn, map_zero' := coe_zero, map_add' := coe_add }
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [topological_space M] [topological_add_group M]
include m
/-- The negative of a vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def neg (v : vector_measure α M) : vector_measure α M :=
{ measure_of' := -v,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ _ hi, by simp [v.not_measurable hi],
m_Union' := λ f hf₁ hf₂, has_sum.neg $ v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂ }
instance : has_neg (vector_measure α M) := ⟨neg⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_neg (v : vector_measure α M) : ⇑(-v) = - v := rfl
lemma neg_apply (v : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :(-v) i = - v i := rfl
/-- The difference of two vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def sub (v w : vector_measure α M) : vector_measure α M :=
{ measure_of' := v - w,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ _ hi,
by simp [v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi],
m_Union' := λ f hf₁ hf₂,
has_sum.sub (v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂)
(w.m_Union hf₁ hf₂) }
instance : has_sub (vector_measure α M) := ⟨sub⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_sub (v w : vector_measure α M) : ⇑(v - w) = v - w := rfl
lemma sub_apply (v w : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) : (v - w) i = v i - w i := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (vector_measure α M) :=
function.injective.add_comm_group _ coe_injective coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(λ _ _, coe_smul _ _) (λ _ _, coe_smul _ _)
end add_comm_group
section distrib_mul_action
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [distrib_mul_action R M] [has_continuous_const_smul R M]
include m
instance [has_continuous_add M] : distrib_mul_action R (vector_measure α M) :=
function.injective.distrib_mul_action coe_fn_add_monoid_hom coe_injective coe_smul
end distrib_mul_action
section module
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [module R M] [has_continuous_const_smul R M]
include m
instance [has_continuous_add M] : module R (vector_measure α M) :=
function.injective.module R coe_fn_add_monoid_hom coe_injective coe_smul
end module
end vector_measure
namespace measure
include m
/-- A finite measure coerced into a real function is a signed measure. -/
@[simps]
def to_signed_measure (μ : measure α) [hμ : is_finite_measure μ] : signed_measure α :=
{ measure_of' := λ i : set α, if measurable_set i then (μ.measure_of i).to_real else 0,
empty' := by simp [μ.empty],
not_measurable' := λ _ hi, if_neg hi,
m_Union' :=
begin
intros _ hf₁ hf₂,
rw [μ.m_Union hf₁ hf₂, ennreal.tsum_to_real_eq, if_pos (measurable_set.Union hf₁),
summable.has_sum_iff],
{ congr, ext n, rw if_pos (hf₁ n) },
{ refine @summable_of_nonneg_of_le _ (ennreal.to_real ∘ μ ∘ f) _ _ _ _,
{ intro, split_ifs,
exacts [ennreal.to_real_nonneg, le_rfl] },
{ intro, split_ifs,
exacts [le_rfl, ennreal.to_real_nonneg] },
exact summable_measure_to_real hf₁ hf₂ },
{ intros a ha,
apply ne_of_lt hμ.measure_univ_lt_top,
rw [eq_top_iff, ← ha, outer_measure.measure_of_eq_coe, coe_to_outer_measure],
exact measure_mono (set.subset_univ _) }
end }
lemma to_signed_measure_apply_measurable {μ : measure α} [is_finite_measure μ]
{i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) :
μ.to_signed_measure i = (μ i).to_real :=
if_pos hi
-- Without this lemma, `singular_part_neg` in `measure_theory.decomposition.lebesgue` is
-- extremely slow
lemma to_signed_measure_congr {μ ν : measure α} [is_finite_measure μ] [is_finite_measure ν]
(h : μ = ν) : μ.to_signed_measure = ν.to_signed_measure :=
by { congr, exact h }
lemma to_signed_measure_eq_to_signed_measure_iff
{μ ν : measure α} [is_finite_measure μ] [is_finite_measure ν] :
μ.to_signed_measure = ν.to_signed_measure ↔ μ = ν :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ ext1 i hi,
have : μ.to_signed_measure i = ν.to_signed_measure i,
{ rw h },
rwa [to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi,
ennreal.to_real_eq_to_real] at this;
{ exact measure_ne_top _ _ } },
{ congr, assumption }
end
@[simp] lemma to_signed_measure_zero :
(0 : measure α).to_signed_measure = 0 :=
by { ext i hi, simp }
@[simp] lemma to_signed_measure_add (μ ν : measure α) [is_finite_measure μ] [is_finite_measure ν] :
(μ + ν).to_signed_measure = μ.to_signed_measure + ν.to_signed_measure :=
begin
ext i hi,
rw [to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply,
ennreal.to_real_add (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _ )) (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)),
vector_measure.add_apply, to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi,
to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi],
all_goals { apply_instance }
end
@[simp] lemma to_signed_measure_smul (μ : measure α) [is_finite_measure μ] (r : ℝ≥0) :
(r • μ).to_signed_measure = r • μ.to_signed_measure :=
begin
ext i hi,
rw [to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, vector_measure.smul_apply,
to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, coe_smul, pi.smul_apply,
ennreal.to_real_smul],
end
/-- A measure is a vector measure over `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
@[simps]
def to_ennreal_vector_measure (μ : measure α) : vector_measure α ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ measure_of' := λ i : set α, if measurable_set i then μ i else 0,
empty' := by simp [μ.empty],
not_measurable' := λ _ hi, if_neg hi,
m_Union' := λ _ hf₁ hf₂,
begin
rw summable.has_sum_iff ennreal.summable,
{ rw [if_pos (measurable_set.Union hf₁), measure_theory.measure_Union hf₂ hf₁],
exact tsum_congr (λ n, if_pos (hf₁ n)) },
end }
lemma to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable
{μ : measure α} {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) :
μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure i = μ i :=
if_pos hi
@[simp] lemma to_ennreal_vector_measure_zero :
(0 : measure α).to_ennreal_vector_measure = 0 :=
by { ext i hi, simp }
@[simp] lemma to_ennreal_vector_measure_add (μ ν : measure α) :
(μ + ν).to_ennreal_vector_measure = μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure + ν.to_ennreal_vector_measure :=
begin
refine measure_theory.vector_measure.ext (λ i hi, _),
rw [to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply, vector_measure.add_apply,
to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable hi, to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable hi]
end
lemma to_signed_measure_sub_apply {μ ν : measure α} [is_finite_measure μ] [is_finite_measure ν]
{i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) :
(μ.to_signed_measure - ν.to_signed_measure) i = (μ i).to_real - (ν i).to_real :=
begin
rw [vector_measure.sub_apply, to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi,
measure.to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, sub_eq_add_neg]
end
end measure
namespace vector_measure
open measure
section
/-- A vector measure over `ℝ≥0∞` is a measure. -/
def ennreal_to_measure {m : measurable_space α} (v : vector_measure α ℝ≥0∞) : measure α :=
of_measurable (λ s _, v s) v.empty (λ f hf₁ hf₂, v.of_disjoint_Union_nat hf₁ hf₂)
lemma ennreal_to_measure_apply {m : measurable_space α} {v : vector_measure α ℝ≥0∞}
{s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) : ennreal_to_measure v s = v s :=
by rw [ennreal_to_measure, of_measurable_apply _ hs]
/-- The equiv between `vector_measure α ℝ≥0∞` and `measure α` formed by
`measure_theory.vector_measure.ennreal_to_measure` and
`measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure`. -/
@[simps] def equiv_measure [measurable_space α] : vector_measure α ℝ≥0∞ ≃ measure α :=
{ to_fun := ennreal_to_measure,
inv_fun := to_ennreal_vector_measure,
left_inv := λ _, ext (λ s hs,
by rw [to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable hs, ennreal_to_measure_apply hs]),
right_inv := λ _, measure.ext (λ s hs,
by rw [ennreal_to_measure_apply hs, to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable hs]) }
end
section
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β]
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables (v : vector_measure α M)
/-- The pushforward of a vector measure along a function. -/
def map (v : vector_measure α M) (f : α → β) :
vector_measure β M :=
if hf : measurable f then
{ measure_of' := λ s, if measurable_set s then v (f ⁻¹' s) else 0,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ i hi, if_neg hi,
m_Union' :=
begin
intros g hg₁ hg₂,
convert v.m_Union (λ i, hf (hg₁ i)) (λ i j hij x hx, hg₂ i j hij hx),
{ ext i, rw if_pos (hg₁ i) },
{ rw [preimage_Union, if_pos (measurable_set.Union hg₁)] }
end } else 0
lemma map_not_measurable {f : α → β} (hf : ¬ measurable f) : v.map f = 0 :=
dif_neg hf
lemma map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f) {s : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) :
v.map f s = v (f ⁻¹' s) :=
by { rw [map, dif_pos hf], exact if_pos hs }
@[simp] lemma map_id : v.map id = v :=
ext (λ i hi, by rw [map_apply v measurable_id hi, preimage_id])
@[simp] lemma map_zero (f : α → β) : (0 : vector_measure α M).map f = 0 :=
begin
by_cases hf : measurable f,
{ ext i hi,
rw [map_apply _ hf hi, zero_apply, zero_apply] },
{ exact dif_neg hf }
end
section
variables {N : Type*} [add_comm_monoid N] [topological_space N]
/-- Given a vector measure `v` on `M` and a continuous add_monoid_hom `f : M → N`, `f ∘ v` is a
vector measure on `N`. -/
def map_range (v : vector_measure α M) (f : M →+ N) (hf : continuous f) : vector_measure α N :=
{ measure_of' := λ s, f (v s),
empty' := by rw [empty, add_monoid_hom.map_zero],
not_measurable' := λ i hi, by rw [not_measurable v hi, add_monoid_hom.map_zero],
m_Union' := λ g hg₁ hg₂, has_sum.map (v.m_Union hg₁ hg₂) f hf }
@[simp] lemma map_range_apply {f : M →+ N} (hf : continuous f) {s : set α} :
v.map_range f hf s = f (v s) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_range_id :
v.map_range (add_monoid_hom.id M) continuous_id = v :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma map_range_zero {f : M →+ N} (hf : continuous f) :
map_range (0 : vector_measure α M) f hf = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
section has_continuous_add
variables [has_continuous_add M] [has_continuous_add N]
@[simp] lemma map_range_add {v w : vector_measure α M} {f : M →+ N} (hf : continuous f) :
(v + w).map_range f hf = v.map_range f hf + w.map_range f hf :=
by { ext, simp }
/-- Given a continuous add_monoid_hom `f : M → N`, `map_range_hom` is the add_monoid_hom mapping the
vector measure `v` on `M` to the vector measure `f ∘ v` on `N`. -/
def map_range_hom (f : M →+ N) (hf : continuous f) : vector_measure α M →+ vector_measure α N :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.map_range f hf,
map_zero' := map_range_zero hf,
map_add' := λ _ _, map_range_add hf }
end has_continuous_add
section module
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [module R M] [module R N]
variables [has_continuous_add M] [has_continuous_add N]
[has_continuous_const_smul R M] [has_continuous_const_smul R N]
/-- Given a continuous linear map `f : M → N`, `map_rangeₗ` is the linear map mapping the
vector measure `v` on `M` to the vector measure `f ∘ v` on `N`. -/
def map_rangeₗ (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (hf : continuous f) : vector_measure α M →ₗ[R] vector_measure α N :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.map_range f.to_add_monoid_hom hf,
map_add' := λ _ _, map_range_add hf,
map_smul' := by { intros, ext, simp } }
end module
end
/-- The restriction of a vector measure on some set. -/
def restrict (v : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :
vector_measure α M :=
if hi : measurable_set i then
{ measure_of' := λ s, if measurable_set s then v (s ∩ i) else 0,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ i hi, if_neg hi,
m_Union' :=
begin
intros f hf₁ hf₂,
convert v.m_Union (λ n, (hf₁ n).inter hi)
(hf₂.mono $ λ i j, disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left),
{ ext n, rw if_pos (hf₁ n) },
{ rw [Union_inter, if_pos (measurable_set.Union hf₁)] }
end } else 0
lemma restrict_not_measurable {i : set α} (hi : ¬ measurable_set i) :
v.restrict i = 0 :=
dif_neg hi
lemma restrict_apply {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i)
{j : set α} (hj : measurable_set j) : v.restrict i j = v (j ∩ i) :=
by { rw [restrict, dif_pos hi], exact if_pos hj }
lemma restrict_eq_self {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i)
{j : set α} (hj : measurable_set j) (hij : j ⊆ i) : v.restrict i j = v j :=
by rw [restrict_apply v hi hj, inter_eq_left_iff_subset.2 hij]
@[simp] lemma restrict_empty : v.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
ext (λ i hi, by rw [restrict_apply v measurable_set.empty hi, inter_empty, v.empty, zero_apply])
@[simp] lemma restrict_univ : v.restrict univ = v :=
ext (λ i hi, by rw [restrict_apply v measurable_set.univ hi, inter_univ])
@[simp] lemma restrict_zero {i : set α} :
(0 : vector_measure α M).restrict i = 0 :=
begin
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ ext j hj, rw [restrict_apply 0 hi hj], refl },
{ exact dif_neg hi }
end
section has_continuous_add
variables [has_continuous_add M]
lemma map_add (v w : vector_measure α M) (f : α → β) :
(v + w).map f = v.map f + w.map f :=
begin
by_cases hf : measurable f,
{ ext i hi,
simp [map_apply _ hf hi] },
{ simp [map, dif_neg hf] }
end
/-- `vector_measure.map` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def map_gm (f : α → β) : vector_measure α M →+ vector_measure β M :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.map f,
map_zero' := map_zero f,
map_add' := λ _ _, map_add _ _ f }
lemma restrict_add (v w : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :
(v + w).restrict i = v.restrict i + w.restrict i :=
begin
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ ext j hj,
simp [restrict_apply _ hi hj] },
{ simp [restrict_not_measurable _ hi] }
end
/--`vector_measure.restrict` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def restrict_gm (i : set α) : vector_measure α M →+ vector_measure α M :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.restrict i,
map_zero' := restrict_zero,
map_add' := λ _ _, restrict_add _ _ i }
end has_continuous_add
end
section
variables [measurable_space β]
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [distrib_mul_action R M] [has_continuous_const_smul R M]
include m
@[simp] lemma map_smul {v : vector_measure α M} {f : α → β} (c : R) :
(c • v).map f = c • v.map f :=
begin
by_cases hf : measurable f,
{ ext i hi,
simp [map_apply _ hf hi] },
{ simp only [map, dif_neg hf],
-- `smul_zero` does not work since we do not require `has_continuous_add`
ext i hi, simp }
end
@[simp] lemma restrict_smul {v :vector_measure α M} {i : set α} (c : R) :
(c • v).restrict i = c • v.restrict i :=
begin
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ ext j hj,
simp [restrict_apply _ hi hj] },
{ simp only [restrict_not_measurable _ hi],
-- `smul_zero` does not work since we do not require `has_continuous_add`
ext j hj, simp }
end
end
section
variables [measurable_space β]
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [module R M]
[has_continuous_const_smul R M] [has_continuous_add M]
include m
/-- `vector_measure.map` as a linear map. -/
@[simps] def mapₗ (f : α → β) : vector_measure α M →ₗ[R] vector_measure β M :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.map f,
map_add' := λ _ _, map_add _ _ f,
map_smul' := λ _ _, map_smul _ }
/-- `vector_measure.restrict` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def restrictₗ (i : set α) : vector_measure α M →ₗ[R] vector_measure α M :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.restrict i,
map_add' := λ _ _, restrict_add _ _ i,
map_smul' := λ _ _, restrict_smul _ }
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M] [partial_order M]
include m
/-- Vector measures over a partially ordered monoid is partially ordered.
This definition is consistent with `measure.partial_order`. -/
instance : partial_order (vector_measure α M) :=
{ le := λ v w, ∀ i, measurable_set i → v i ≤ w i,
le_refl := λ v i hi, le_rfl,
le_trans := λ u v w h₁ h₂ i hi, le_trans (h₁ i hi) (h₂ i hi),
le_antisymm := λ v w h₁ h₂, ext (λ i hi, le_antisymm (h₁ i hi) (h₂ i hi)) }
variables {u v w : vector_measure α M}
lemma le_iff : v ≤ w ↔ ∀ i, measurable_set i → v i ≤ w i :=
iff.rfl
lemma le_iff' : v ≤ w ↔ ∀ i, v i ≤ w i :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h i, _, λ h i hi, h i⟩,
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ exact h i hi },
{ rw [v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi] }
end
end
localized "notation v ` ≤[`:50 i:50 `] `:0 w:50 :=
measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict v i ≤ measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict w i"
in measure_theory
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M] [partial_order M]
variables (v w : vector_measure α M)
lemma restrict_le_restrict_iff {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) :
v ≤[i] w ↔ ∀ ⦃j⦄, measurable_set j → j ⊆ i → v j ≤ w j :=
⟨λ h j hj₁ hj₂, (restrict_eq_self v hi hj₁ hj₂) ▸ (restrict_eq_self w hi hj₁ hj₂) ▸ h j hj₁,
λ h, le_iff.1 (λ j hj, (restrict_apply v hi hj).symm ▸ (restrict_apply w hi hj).symm ▸
h (hj.inter hi) (set.inter_subset_right j i))⟩
lemma subset_le_of_restrict_le_restrict {i : set α}
(hi : measurable_set i) (hi₂ : v ≤[i] w) {j : set α} (hj : j ⊆ i) :
v j ≤ w j :=
begin
by_cases hj₁ : measurable_set j,
{ exact (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi).1 hi₂ hj₁ hj },
{ rw [v.not_measurable hj₁, w.not_measurable hj₁] },
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le {i : set α}
(h : ∀ ⦃j⦄, measurable_set j → j ⊆ i → v j ≤ w j) : v ≤[i] w :=
begin
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ exact (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi).2 h },
{ rw [restrict_not_measurable v hi, restrict_not_measurable w hi],
exact le_rfl },
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_subset {i j : set α}
(hi₁ : measurable_set i) (hi₂ : v ≤[i] w) (hij : j ⊆ i) : v ≤[j] w :=
restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le v w (λ k hk₁ hk₂,
subset_le_of_restrict_le_restrict v w hi₁ hi₂ (set.subset.trans hk₂ hij))
lemma le_restrict_empty : v ≤[∅] w :=
begin
intros j hj,
rw [restrict_empty, restrict_empty]
end
lemma le_restrict_univ_iff_le : v ≤[univ] w ↔ v ≤ w :=
begin
split,
{ intros h s hs,
have := h s hs,
rwa [restrict_apply _ measurable_set.univ hs, inter_univ,
restrict_apply _ measurable_set.univ hs, inter_univ] at this },
{ intros h s hs,
rw [restrict_apply _ measurable_set.univ hs, inter_univ,
restrict_apply _ measurable_set.univ hs, inter_univ],
exact h s hs }
end
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [ordered_add_comm_group M] [topological_add_group M]
variables (v w : vector_measure α M)
lemma neg_le_neg {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) (h : v ≤[i] w) : -w ≤[i] -v :=
begin
intros j hj₁,
rw [restrict_apply _ hi hj₁, restrict_apply _ hi hj₁, neg_apply, neg_apply],
refine neg_le_neg _,
rw [← restrict_apply _ hi hj₁, ← restrict_apply _ hi hj₁],
exact h j hj₁,
end
@[simp]
lemma neg_le_neg_iff {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) : -w ≤[i] -v ↔ v ≤[i] w :=
⟨λ h, neg_neg v ▸ neg_neg w ▸ neg_le_neg _ _ hi h, λ h, neg_le_neg _ _ hi h⟩
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [ordered_add_comm_monoid M] [order_closed_topology M]
variables (v w : vector_measure α M) {i j : set α}
lemma restrict_le_restrict_Union {f : ℕ → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ n, measurable_set (f n)) (hf₂ : ∀ n, v ≤[f n] w) :
v ≤[⋃ n, f n] w :=
begin
refine restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le v w (λ a ha₁ ha₂, _),
have ha₃ : (⋃ n, a ∩ disjointed f n) = a,
{ rwa [← inter_Union, Union_disjointed, inter_eq_left_iff_subset] },
have ha₄ : pairwise (disjoint on (λ n, a ∩ disjointed f n)),
{ exact (disjoint_disjointed _).mono (λ i j, disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right) },
rw [← ha₃, v.of_disjoint_Union_nat _ ha₄, w.of_disjoint_Union_nat _ ha₄],
refine tsum_le_tsum (λ n, (restrict_le_restrict_iff v w (hf₁ n)).1 (hf₂ n) _ _) _ _,
{ exact (ha₁.inter (measurable_set.disjointed hf₁ n)) },
{ exact set.subset.trans (set.inter_subset_right _ _) (disjointed_subset _ _) },
{ refine (v.m_Union (λ n, _) _).summable,
{ exact ha₁.inter (measurable_set.disjointed hf₁ n) },
{ exact (disjoint_disjointed _).mono (λ i j, disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right) } },
{ refine (w.m_Union (λ n, _) _).summable,
{ exact ha₁.inter (measurable_set.disjointed hf₁ n) },
{ exact (disjoint_disjointed _).mono (λ i j, disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right) } },
{ intro n, exact (ha₁.inter (measurable_set.disjointed hf₁ n)) },
{ exact λ n, ha₁.inter (measurable_set.disjointed hf₁ n) }
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_encodable_Union [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ b, measurable_set (f b)) (hf₂ : ∀ b, v ≤[f b] w) :
v ≤[⋃ b, f b] w :=
begin
rw ← encodable.Union_decode₂,
refine restrict_le_restrict_Union v w _ _,
{ intro n, measurability },
{ intro n,
cases encodable.decode₂ β n with b,
{ simp },
{ simp [hf₂ b] } }
end
lemma restrict_le_restrict_union
(hi₁ : measurable_set i) (hi₂ : v ≤[i] w)
(hj₁ : measurable_set j) (hj₂ : v ≤[j] w) :
v ≤[i ∪ j] w :=
begin
rw union_eq_Union,
refine restrict_le_restrict_encodable_Union v w _ _,
{ measurability },
{ rintro (_ | _); simpa }
end
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [ordered_add_comm_monoid M]
variables (v w : vector_measure α M) {i j : set α}
lemma nonneg_of_zero_le_restrict (hi₂ : 0 ≤[i] v) :
0 ≤ v i :=
begin
by_cases hi₁ : measurable_set i,
{ exact (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁).1 hi₂ hi₁ set.subset.rfl },
{ rw v.not_measurable hi₁ },
end
lemma nonpos_of_restrict_le_zero (hi₂ : v ≤[i] 0) :
v i ≤ 0 :=
begin
by_cases hi₁ : measurable_set i,
{ exact (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁).1 hi₂ hi₁ set.subset.rfl },
{ rw v.not_measurable hi₁ }
end
lemma zero_le_restrict_not_measurable (hi : ¬ measurable_set i) :
0 ≤[i] v :=
begin
rw [restrict_zero, restrict_not_measurable _ hi],
exact le_rfl,
end
lemma restrict_le_zero_of_not_measurable (hi : ¬ measurable_set i) :
v ≤[i] 0 :=
begin
rw [restrict_zero, restrict_not_measurable _ hi],
exact le_rfl,
end
lemma measurable_of_not_zero_le_restrict (hi : ¬ 0 ≤[i] v) : measurable_set i :=
not.imp_symm (zero_le_restrict_not_measurable _) hi
lemma measurable_of_not_restrict_le_zero (hi : ¬ v ≤[i] 0) : measurable_set i :=
not.imp_symm (restrict_le_zero_of_not_measurable _) hi
lemma zero_le_restrict_subset (hi₁ : measurable_set i) (hij : j ⊆ i) (hi₂ : 0 ≤[i] v):
0 ≤[j] v :=
restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le _ _
(λ k hk₁ hk₂, (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁).1 hi₂ hk₁ (set.subset.trans hk₂ hij))
lemma restrict_le_zero_subset (hi₁ : measurable_set i) (hij : j ⊆ i) (hi₂ : v ≤[i] 0):
v ≤[j] 0 :=
restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le _ _
(λ k hk₁ hk₂, (restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁).1 hi₂ hk₁ (set.subset.trans hk₂ hij))
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid M]
variables (v w : vector_measure α M) {i j : set α}
include m
lemma exists_pos_measure_of_not_restrict_le_zero (hi : ¬ v ≤[i] 0) :
∃ j : set α, measurable_set j ∧ j ⊆ i ∧ 0 < v j :=
begin
have hi₁ : measurable_set i := measurable_of_not_restrict_le_zero _ hi,
rw [restrict_le_restrict_iff _ _ hi₁] at hi,
push_neg at hi,
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂, hj⟩ := hi,
exact ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂, hj⟩,
end
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M] [partial_order M]
[covariant_class M M (+) (≤)] [has_continuous_add M]
include m
instance covariant_add_le :
covariant_class (vector_measure α M) (vector_measure α M) (+) (≤) :=
⟨λ u v w h i hi, add_le_add_left (h i hi) _⟩
end
section
variables {L M N : Type*}
variables [add_comm_monoid L] [topological_space L] [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
[add_comm_monoid N] [topological_space N]
include m
/-- A vector measure `v` is absolutely continuous with respect to a measure `μ` if for all sets
`s`, `μ s = 0`, we have `v s = 0`. -/
def absolutely_continuous (v : vector_measure α M) (w : vector_measure α N) :=
∀ ⦃s : set α⦄, w s = 0 → v s = 0
localized "infix ` ≪ᵥ `:50 := measure_theory.vector_measure.absolutely_continuous"
in measure_theory
open_locale measure_theory
namespace absolutely_continuous
variables {v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N}
lemma mk (h : ∀ ⦃s : set α⦄, measurable_set s → w s = 0 → v s = 0) : v ≪ᵥ w :=
begin
intros s hs,
by_cases hmeas : measurable_set s,
{ exact h hmeas hs },
{ exact not_measurable v hmeas }
end
lemma eq {w : vector_measure α M} (h : v = w) : v ≪ᵥ w :=
λ s hs, h.symm ▸ hs
@[refl] lemma refl (v : vector_measure α M) : v ≪ᵥ v :=
eq rfl
@[trans] lemma trans {u : vector_measure α L} {v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N}
(huv : u ≪ᵥ v) (hvw : v ≪ᵥ w) : u ≪ᵥ w :=
λ _ hs, huv $ hvw hs
lemma zero (v : vector_measure α N) : (0 : vector_measure α M) ≪ᵥ v :=
λ s _, vector_measure.zero_apply s
lemma neg_left {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [topological_space M] [topological_add_group M]
{v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N} (h : v ≪ᵥ w) : -v ≪ᵥ w :=
λ s hs, by { rw [neg_apply, h hs, neg_zero] }
lemma neg_right {N : Type*} [add_comm_group N] [topological_space N] [topological_add_group N]
{v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N} (h : v ≪ᵥ w) : v ≪ᵥ -w :=
begin
intros s hs,
rw [neg_apply, neg_eq_zero] at hs,
exact h hs
end
lemma add [has_continuous_add M] {v₁ v₂ : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N}
(hv₁ : v₁ ≪ᵥ w) (hv₂ : v₂ ≪ᵥ w) : v₁ + v₂ ≪ᵥ w :=
λ s hs, by { rw [add_apply, hv₁ hs, hv₂ hs, zero_add] }
lemma sub {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [topological_space M] [topological_add_group M]
{v₁ v₂ : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N} (hv₁ : v₁ ≪ᵥ w) (hv₂ : v₂ ≪ᵥ w) :
v₁ - v₂ ≪ᵥ w :=
λ s hs, by { rw [sub_apply, hv₁ hs, hv₂ hs, zero_sub, neg_zero] }
lemma smul {R : Type*} [semiring R] [distrib_mul_action R M] [has_continuous_const_smul R M]
{r : R} {v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N} (h : v ≪ᵥ w) :
r • v ≪ᵥ w :=
λ s hs, by { rw [smul_apply, h hs, smul_zero] }
lemma map [measure_space β] (h : v ≪ᵥ w) (f : α → β) :
v.map f ≪ᵥ w.map f :=
begin
by_cases hf : measurable f,
{ refine mk (λ s hs hws, _),
rw map_apply _ hf hs at hws ⊢,
exact h hws },
{ intros s hs,
rw [map_not_measurable v hf, zero_apply] }
end
lemma ennreal_to_measure {μ : vector_measure α ℝ≥0∞} :
(∀ ⦃s : set α⦄, μ.ennreal_to_measure s = 0 → v s = 0) ↔ v ≪ᵥ μ :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ refine mk (λ s hmeas hs, h _),
rw [← hs, ennreal_to_measure_apply hmeas] },
{ intros s hs,
by_cases hmeas : measurable_set s,
{ rw ennreal_to_measure_apply hmeas at hs,
exact h hs },
{ exact not_measurable v hmeas } },
end
end absolutely_continuous
/-- Two vector measures `v` and `w` are said to be mutually singular if there exists a measurable
set `s`, such that for all `t ⊆ s`, `v t = 0` and for all `t ⊆ sᶜ`, `w t = 0`.
We note that we do not require the measurability of `t` in the definition since this makes it easier
to use. This is equivalent to the definition which requires measurability. To prove
`mutually_singular` with the measurability condition, use
`measure_theory.vector_measure.mutually_singular.mk`. -/
def mutually_singular (v : vector_measure α M) (w : vector_measure α N) : Prop :=
∃ (s : set α), measurable_set s ∧ (∀ t ⊆ s, v t = 0) ∧ (∀ t ⊆ sᶜ, w t = 0)
localized "infix ` ⊥ᵥ `:60 := measure_theory.vector_measure.mutually_singular" in measure_theory
namespace mutually_singular
variables {v v₁ v₂ : vector_measure α M} {w w₁ w₂ : vector_measure α N}
lemma mk (s : set α) (hs : measurable_set s)
(h₁ : ∀ t ⊆ s, measurable_set t → v t = 0)
(h₂ : ∀ t ⊆ sᶜ, measurable_set t → w t = 0) : v ⊥ᵥ w :=
begin
refine ⟨s, hs, λ t hst, _, λ t hst, _⟩;
by_cases ht : measurable_set t,
{ exact h₁ t hst ht },
{ exact not_measurable v ht },
{ exact h₂ t hst ht },
{ exact not_measurable w ht }
end
lemma symm (h : v ⊥ᵥ w) : w ⊥ᵥ v :=
let ⟨s, hmeas, hs₁, hs₂⟩ := h in
⟨sᶜ, hmeas.compl, hs₂, λ t ht, hs₁ _ (compl_compl s ▸ ht : t ⊆ s)⟩
lemma zero_right : v ⊥ᵥ (0 : vector_measure α N) :=
⟨∅, measurable_set.empty, λ t ht, (subset_empty_iff.1 ht).symm ▸ v.empty, λ _ _, zero_apply _⟩
lemma zero_left : (0 : vector_measure α M) ⊥ᵥ w :=
zero_right.symm
lemma add_left [t2_space N] [has_continuous_add M] (h₁ : v₁ ⊥ᵥ w) (h₂ : v₂ ⊥ᵥ w) : v₁ + v₂ ⊥ᵥ w :=
begin
obtain ⟨u, hmu, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := h₁,
obtain ⟨v, hmv, hv₁, hv₂⟩ := h₂,
refine mk (u ∩ v) (hmu.inter hmv) (λ t ht hmt, _) (λ t ht hmt, _),
{ rw [add_apply, hu₁ _ (subset_inter_iff.1 ht).1, hv₁ _ (subset_inter_iff.1 ht).2, zero_add] },
{ rw compl_inter at ht,
rw [(_ : t = (uᶜ ∩ t) ∪ (vᶜ \ uᶜ ∩ t)),
of_union _ (hmu.compl.inter hmt) ((hmv.compl.diff hmu.compl).inter hmt),
hu₂, hv₂, add_zero],
{ exact subset.trans (inter_subset_left _ _) (diff_subset _ _) },
{ exact inter_subset_left _ _ },
{ apply_instance },
{ exact disjoint.mono (inter_subset_left _ _) (inter_subset_left _ _) disjoint_diff },
{ apply subset.antisymm;
intros x hx,
{ by_cases hxu' : x ∈ uᶜ,
{ exact or.inl ⟨hxu', hx⟩ },
rcases ht hx with (hxu | hxv),
exacts [false.elim (hxu' hxu), or.inr ⟨⟨hxv, hxu'⟩, hx⟩] },
{ rcases hx; exact hx.2 } } },
end
lemma add_right [t2_space M] [has_continuous_add N] (h₁ : v ⊥ᵥ w₁) (h₂ : v ⊥ᵥ w₂) : v ⊥ᵥ w₁ + w₂ :=
(add_left h₁.symm h₂.symm).symm
lemma smul_right {R : Type*} [semiring R] [distrib_mul_action R N] [has_continuous_const_smul R N]
(r : R) (h : v ⊥ᵥ w) : v ⊥ᵥ r • w :=
let ⟨s, hmeas, hs₁, hs₂⟩ := h in
⟨s, hmeas, hs₁, λ t ht, by simp only [coe_smul, pi.smul_apply, hs₂ t ht, smul_zero]⟩
lemma smul_left {R : Type*} [semiring R] [distrib_mul_action R M] [has_continuous_const_smul R M]
(r : R) (h : v ⊥ᵥ w) : r • v ⊥ᵥ w :=
(smul_right r h.symm).symm
lemma neg_left {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [topological_space M] [topological_add_group M]
{v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N} (h : v ⊥ᵥ w) : -v ⊥ᵥ w :=
begin
obtain ⟨u, hmu, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := h,
refine ⟨u, hmu, λ s hs, _, hu₂⟩,
rw [neg_apply v s, neg_eq_zero],
exact hu₁ s hs
end
lemma neg_right {N : Type*} [add_comm_group N] [topological_space N] [topological_add_group N]
{v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N} (h : v ⊥ᵥ w) : v ⊥ᵥ -w :=
h.symm.neg_left.symm
@[simp]
lemma neg_left_iff {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [topological_space M] [topological_add_group M]
{v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N} :
-v ⊥ᵥ w ↔ v ⊥ᵥ w :=
⟨λ h, neg_neg v ▸ h.neg_left, neg_left⟩
@[simp]
lemma neg_right_iff {N : Type*} [add_comm_group N] [topological_space N] [topological_add_group N]
{v : vector_measure α M} {w : vector_measure α N} :
v ⊥ᵥ -w ↔ v ⊥ᵥ w :=
⟨λ h, neg_neg w ▸ h.neg_right, neg_right⟩
end mutually_singular
section trim
omit m
/-- Restriction of a vector measure onto a sub-σ-algebra. -/
@[simps] def trim {m n : measurable_space α} (v : vector_measure α M) (hle : m ≤ n) :
@vector_measure α m M _ _ :=
{ measure_of' := λ i, if measurable_set[m] i then v i else 0,
empty' := by rw [if_pos measurable_set.empty, v.empty],
not_measurable' := λ i hi, by rw if_neg hi,
m_Union' := λ f hf₁ hf₂,
begin
have hf₁' : ∀ k, measurable_set[n] (f k) := λ k, hle _ (hf₁ k),
convert v.m_Union hf₁' hf₂,
{ ext n, rw if_pos (hf₁ n) },
{ rw if_pos (@measurable_set.Union _ _ m _ _ hf₁) }
end }
variables {n : measurable_space α} {v : vector_measure α M}
lemma trim_eq_self : v.trim le_rfl = v :=
begin
ext1 i hi,
exact if_pos hi,
end
@[simp] lemma zero_trim (hle : m ≤ n) :
(0 : vector_measure α M).trim hle = 0 :=
begin
ext1 i hi,
exact if_pos hi,
end
lemma trim_measurable_set_eq (hle : m ≤ n) {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set[m] i) :
v.trim hle i = v i :=
if_pos hi
lemma restrict_trim (hle : m ≤ n) {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set[m] i) :
@vector_measure.restrict α m M _ _ (v.trim hle) i = (v.restrict i).trim hle :=
begin
ext j hj,
rw [restrict_apply, trim_measurable_set_eq hle hj, restrict_apply, trim_measurable_set_eq],
all_goals { measurability }
end
end trim
end
end vector_measure
namespace signed_measure
open vector_measure
open_locale measure_theory
include m
/-- The underlying function for `signed_measure.to_measure_of_zero_le`. -/
def to_measure_of_zero_le' (s : signed_measure α) (i : set α) (hi : 0 ≤[i] s)
(j : set α) (hj : measurable_set j) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
@coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ _ ⟨s.restrict i j, le_trans (by simp) (hi j hj)⟩
/-- Given a signed measure `s` and a positive measurable set `i`, `to_measure_of_zero_le`
provides the measure, mapping measurable sets `j` to `s (i ∩ j)`. -/
def to_measure_of_zero_le (s : signed_measure α) (i : set α)
(hi₁ : measurable_set i) (hi₂ : 0 ≤[i] s) : measure α :=
measure.of_measurable (s.to_measure_of_zero_le' i hi₂)
(by { simp_rw [to_measure_of_zero_le', s.restrict_apply hi₁ measurable_set.empty,
set.empty_inter i, s.empty], refl })
begin
intros f hf₁ hf₂,
have h₁ : ∀ n, measurable_set (i ∩ f n) := λ n, hi₁.inter (hf₁ n),
have h₂ : pairwise (disjoint on λ (n : ℕ), i ∩ f n),
{ rintro n m hnm x ⟨⟨_, hx₁⟩, _, hx₂⟩,
exact hf₂ n m hnm ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ },
simp only [to_measure_of_zero_le', s.restrict_apply hi₁ (measurable_set.Union hf₁),
set.inter_comm, set.inter_Union, s.of_disjoint_Union_nat h₁ h₂,
ennreal.some_eq_coe, id.def],
have h : ∀ n, 0 ≤ s (i ∩ f n) :=
λ n, s.nonneg_of_zero_le_restrict
(s.zero_le_restrict_subset hi₁ (inter_subset_left _ _) hi₂),
rw [nnreal.coe_tsum_of_nonneg h, ennreal.coe_tsum],
{ refine tsum_congr (λ n, _),
simp_rw [s.restrict_apply hi₁ (hf₁ n), set.inter_comm] },
{ exact (nnreal.summable_coe_of_nonneg h).2 (s.m_Union h₁ h₂).summable }
end
variables (s : signed_measure α) {i j : set α}
lemma to_measure_of_zero_le_apply (hi : 0 ≤[i] s)
(hi₁ : measurable_set i) (hj₁ : measurable_set j) :
s.to_measure_of_zero_le i hi₁ hi j =
@coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ _ ⟨s (i ∩ j), nonneg_of_zero_le_restrict s
(zero_le_restrict_subset s hi₁ (set.inter_subset_left _ _) hi)⟩ :=
by simp_rw [to_measure_of_zero_le, measure.of_measurable_apply _ hj₁, to_measure_of_zero_le',
s.restrict_apply hi₁ hj₁, set.inter_comm]
/-- Given a signed measure `s` and a negative measurable set `i`, `to_measure_of_le_zero`
provides the measure, mapping measurable sets `j` to `-s (i ∩ j)`. -/
def to_measure_of_le_zero (s : signed_measure α) (i : set α) (hi₁ : measurable_set i)
(hi₂ : s ≤[i] 0) : measure α :=
to_measure_of_zero_le (-s) i hi₁ $ (@neg_zero (vector_measure α ℝ) _) ▸ neg_le_neg _ _ hi₁ hi₂
lemma to_measure_of_le_zero_apply (hi : s ≤[i] 0)
(hi₁ : measurable_set i) (hj₁ : measurable_set j) :
s.to_measure_of_le_zero i hi₁ hi j =
@coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ _ ⟨-s (i ∩ j), neg_apply s (i ∩ j) ▸ nonneg_of_zero_le_restrict _
(zero_le_restrict_subset _ hi₁ (set.inter_subset_left _ _)
((@neg_zero (vector_measure α ℝ) _) ▸ neg_le_neg _ _ hi₁ hi))⟩ :=
begin
erw [to_measure_of_zero_le_apply],
{ simp },
{ assumption },
end
/-- `signed_measure.to_measure_of_zero_le` is a finite measure. -/
instance to_measure_of_zero_le_finite (hi : 0 ≤[i] s) (hi₁ : measurable_set i) :
is_finite_measure (s.to_measure_of_zero_le i hi₁ hi) :=
{ measure_univ_lt_top :=
begin
rw [to_measure_of_zero_le_apply s hi hi₁ measurable_set.univ],
exact ennreal.coe_lt_top,
end }
/-- `signed_measure.to_measure_of_le_zero` is a finite measure. -/
instance to_measure_of_le_zero_finite (hi : s ≤[i] 0) (hi₁ : measurable_set i) :
is_finite_measure (s.to_measure_of_le_zero i hi₁ hi) :=
{ measure_univ_lt_top :=
begin
rw [to_measure_of_le_zero_apply s hi hi₁ measurable_set.univ],
exact ennreal.coe_lt_top,
end }
lemma to_measure_of_zero_le_to_signed_measure (hs : 0 ≤[univ] s) :
(s.to_measure_of_zero_le univ measurable_set.univ hs).to_signed_measure = s :=
begin
ext i hi,
simp [measure.to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, to_measure_of_zero_le_apply _ _ _ hi],
end
lemma to_measure_of_le_zero_to_signed_measure (hs : s ≤[univ] 0) :
(s.to_measure_of_le_zero univ measurable_set.univ hs).to_signed_measure = -s :=
begin
ext i hi,
simp [measure.to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, to_measure_of_le_zero_apply _ _ _ hi],
end
end signed_measure
namespace measure
open vector_measure
variables (μ : measure α) [is_finite_measure μ]
lemma zero_le_to_signed_measure : 0 ≤ μ.to_signed_measure :=
begin
rw ← le_restrict_univ_iff_le,
refine restrict_le_restrict_of_subset_le _ _ (λ j hj₁ _, _),
simp only [measure.to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hj₁, coe_zero, pi.zero_apply,
ennreal.to_real_nonneg, vector_measure.coe_zero]
end
lemma to_signed_measure_to_measure_of_zero_le :
μ.to_signed_measure.to_measure_of_zero_le univ measurable_set.univ
((le_restrict_univ_iff_le _ _).2 (zero_le_to_signed_measure μ)) = μ :=
begin
refine measure.ext (λ i hi, _),
lift μ i to ℝ≥0 using (measure_lt_top _ _).ne with m hm,
simp [signed_measure.to_measure_of_zero_le_apply _ _ _ hi,
measure.to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, ← hm],
end
end measure
end measure_theory
|
89ca93d4d1f50dc4374f6a5a21e9e85cd8683724 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/order/bounds.lean | 16df805a04d43a0a91733961c58504543cf96867 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 30,677 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.set.intervals.basic
import algebra.ordered_group
/-!
# Upper / lower bounds
In this file we define:
* `upper_bounds`, `lower_bounds` : the set of upper bounds (resp., lower bounds) of a set;
* `bdd_above s`, `bdd_below s` : the set `s` is bounded above (resp., below), i.e., the set of upper
(resp., lower) bounds of `s` is nonempty;
* `is_least s a`, `is_greatest s a` : `a` is a least (resp., greatest) element of `s`;
for a partial order, it is unique if exists;
* `is_lub s a`, `is_glb s a` : `a` is a least upper bound (resp., a greatest lower bound)
of `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists.
We also prove various lemmas about monotonicity, behaviour under `∪`, `∩`, `insert`, and provide
formulas for `∅`, `univ`, and intervals.
-/
open set
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
section
variables [preorder α] [preorder β] {s t : set α} {a b : α}
/-!
### Definitions
-/
/-- The set of upper bounds of a set. -/
def upper_bounds (s : set α) : set α := { x | ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ≤ x }
/-- The set of lower bounds of a set. -/
def lower_bounds (s : set α) : set α := { x | ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → x ≤ a }
/-- A set is bounded above if there exists an upper bound. -/
def bdd_above (s : set α) := (upper_bounds s).nonempty
/-- A set is bounded below if there exists a lower bound. -/
def bdd_below (s : set α) := (lower_bounds s).nonempty
/-- `a` is a least element of a set `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists. -/
def is_least (s : set α) (a : α) : Prop := a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ lower_bounds s
/-- `a` is a greatest element of a set `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists -/
def is_greatest (s : set α) (a : α) : Prop := a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ upper_bounds s
/-- `a` is a least upper bound of a set `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists. -/
def is_lub (s : set α) : α → Prop := is_least (upper_bounds s)
/-- `a` is a greatest lower bound of a set `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists. -/
def is_glb (s : set α) : α → Prop := is_greatest (lower_bounds s)
lemma mem_upper_bounds : a ∈ upper_bounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a := iff.rfl
lemma mem_lower_bounds : a ∈ lower_bounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x := iff.rfl
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not greater than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `preorder` structure and uses
`¬(y ≤ x)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bdd_above_iff`. -/
lemma not_bdd_above_iff' : ¬bdd_above s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬(y ≤ x) :=
by simp [bdd_above, upper_bounds, set.nonempty]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not less than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `preorder` structure and uses
`¬(x ≤ y)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bdd_below_iff`. -/
lemma not_bdd_below_iff' : ¬bdd_below s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬(x ≤ y) :=
@not_bdd_above_iff' (order_dual α) _ _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is greater
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bdd_above_iff'`. -/
lemma not_bdd_above_iff {α : Type*} [linear_order α] {s : set α} :
¬bdd_above s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, x < y :=
by simp only [not_bdd_above_iff', not_le]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is less
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bdd_below_iff'`. -/
lemma not_bdd_below_iff {α : Type*} [linear_order α] {s : set α} :
¬bdd_below s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
@not_bdd_above_iff (order_dual α) _ _
/-!
### Monotonicity
-/
lemma upper_bounds_mono_set ⦃s t : set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) :
upper_bounds t ⊆ upper_bounds s :=
λ b hb x h, hb $ hst h
lemma lower_bounds_mono_set ⦃s t : set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) :
lower_bounds t ⊆ lower_bounds s :=
λ b hb x h, hb $ hst h
lemma upper_bounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : a ∈ upper_bounds s → b ∈ upper_bounds s :=
λ ha x h, le_trans (ha h) hab
lemma lower_bounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : b ∈ lower_bounds s → a ∈ lower_bounds s :=
λ hb x h, le_trans hab (hb h)
lemma upper_bounds_mono ⦃s t : set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
a ∈ upper_bounds t → b ∈ upper_bounds s :=
λ ha, upper_bounds_mono_set hst $ upper_bounds_mono_mem hab ha
lemma lower_bounds_mono ⦃s t : set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
b ∈ lower_bounds t → a ∈ lower_bounds s :=
λ hb, lower_bounds_mono_set hst $ lower_bounds_mono_mem hab hb
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded above, then so is `s`. -/
lemma bdd_above.mono ⦃s t : set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : bdd_above t → bdd_above s :=
nonempty.mono $ upper_bounds_mono_set h
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded below, then so is `s`. -/
lemma bdd_below.mono ⦃s t : set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : bdd_below t → bdd_below s :=
nonempty.mono $ lower_bounds_mono_set h
/-- If `a` is a least upper bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a least upper bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
lemma is_lub.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : set α} (hs : is_lub s a) (hp : is_lub p a)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (htp : t ⊆ p) : is_lub t a :=
⟨upper_bounds_mono_set htp hp.1, lower_bounds_mono_set (upper_bounds_mono_set hst) hs.2⟩
/-- If `a` is a greatest lower bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a greater lower bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
lemma is_glb.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : set α} (hs : is_glb s a) (hp : is_glb p a)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (htp : t ⊆ p) : is_glb t a :=
@is_lub.of_subset_of_superset (order_dual α) _ a s t p hs hp hst htp
lemma is_least.mono (ha : is_least s a) (hb : is_least t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
lemma is_greatest.mono (ha : is_greatest s a) (hb : is_greatest t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
lemma is_lub.mono (ha : is_lub s a) (hb : is_lub t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
hb.mono ha $ upper_bounds_mono_set hst
lemma is_glb.mono (ha : is_glb s a) (hb : is_glb t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
hb.mono ha $ lower_bounds_mono_set hst
/-!
### Conversions
-/
lemma is_least.is_glb (h : is_least s a) : is_glb s a := ⟨h.2, λ b hb, hb h.1⟩
lemma is_greatest.is_lub (h : is_greatest s a) : is_lub s a := ⟨h.2, λ b hb, hb h.1⟩
lemma is_lub.upper_bounds_eq (h : is_lub s a) : upper_bounds s = Ici a :=
set.ext $ λ b, ⟨λ hb, h.2 hb, λ hb, upper_bounds_mono_mem hb h.1⟩
lemma is_glb.lower_bounds_eq (h : is_glb s a) : lower_bounds s = Iic a :=
@is_lub.upper_bounds_eq (order_dual α) _ _ _ h
lemma is_least.lower_bounds_eq (h : is_least s a) : lower_bounds s = Iic a :=
h.is_glb.lower_bounds_eq
lemma is_greatest.upper_bounds_eq (h : is_greatest s a) : upper_bounds s = Ici a :=
h.is_lub.upper_bounds_eq
lemma is_lub_le_iff (h : is_lub s a) : a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upper_bounds s :=
by { rw h.upper_bounds_eq, refl }
lemma le_is_glb_iff (h : is_glb s a) : b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lower_bounds s :=
by { rw h.lower_bounds_eq, refl }
/-- If `s` has a least upper bound, then it is bounded above. -/
lemma is_lub.bdd_above (h : is_lub s a) : bdd_above s := ⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest lower bound, then it is bounded below. -/
lemma is_glb.bdd_below (h : is_glb s a) : bdd_below s := ⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest element, then it is bounded above. -/
lemma is_greatest.bdd_above (h : is_greatest s a) : bdd_above s := ⟨a, h.2⟩
/-- If `s` has a least element, then it is bounded below. -/
lemma is_least.bdd_below (h : is_least s a) : bdd_below s := ⟨a, h.2⟩
lemma is_least.nonempty (h : is_least s a) : s.nonempty := ⟨a, h.1⟩
lemma is_greatest.nonempty (h : is_greatest s a) : s.nonempty := ⟨a, h.1⟩
/-!
### Union and intersection
-/
@[simp] lemma upper_bounds_union : upper_bounds (s ∪ t) = upper_bounds s ∩ upper_bounds t :=
subset.antisymm
(λ b hb, ⟨λ x hx, hb (or.inl hx), λ x hx, hb (or.inr hx)⟩)
(λ b hb x hx, hx.elim (λ hs, hb.1 hs) (λ ht, hb.2 ht))
@[simp] lemma lower_bounds_union : lower_bounds (s ∪ t) = lower_bounds s ∩ lower_bounds t :=
@upper_bounds_union (order_dual α) _ s t
lemma union_upper_bounds_subset_upper_bounds_inter :
upper_bounds s ∪ upper_bounds t ⊆ upper_bounds (s ∩ t) :=
union_subset
(upper_bounds_mono_set $ inter_subset_left _ _)
(upper_bounds_mono_set $ inter_subset_right _ _)
lemma union_lower_bounds_subset_lower_bounds_inter :
lower_bounds s ∪ lower_bounds t ⊆ lower_bounds (s ∩ t) :=
@union_upper_bounds_subset_upper_bounds_inter (order_dual α) _ s t
lemma is_least_union_iff {a : α} {s t : set α} :
is_least (s ∪ t) a ↔ (is_least s a ∧ a ∈ lower_bounds t ∨ a ∈ lower_bounds s ∧ is_least t a) :=
by simp [is_least, lower_bounds_union, or_and_distrib_right, and_comm (a ∈ t), and_assoc]
lemma is_greatest_union_iff :
is_greatest (s ∪ t) a ↔ (is_greatest s a ∧ a ∈ upper_bounds t ∨
a ∈ upper_bounds s ∧ is_greatest t a) :=
@is_least_union_iff (order_dual α) _ a s t
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
lemma bdd_above.inter_of_left (h : bdd_above s) : bdd_above (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono $ inter_subset_left s t
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
lemma bdd_above.inter_of_right (h : bdd_above t) : bdd_above (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono $ inter_subset_right s t
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
lemma bdd_below.inter_of_left (h : bdd_below s) : bdd_below (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono $ inter_subset_left s t
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
lemma bdd_below.inter_of_right (h : bdd_below t) : bdd_below (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono $ inter_subset_right s t
/-- If `s` and `t` are bounded above sets in a `semilattice_sup`, then so is `s ∪ t`. -/
lemma bdd_above.union [semilattice_sup γ] {s t : set γ} :
bdd_above s → bdd_above t → bdd_above (s ∪ t) :=
begin
rintros ⟨bs, hs⟩ ⟨bt, ht⟩,
use bs ⊔ bt,
rw upper_bounds_union,
exact ⟨upper_bounds_mono_mem le_sup_left hs,
upper_bounds_mono_mem le_sup_right ht⟩
end
/-- The union of two sets is bounded above if and only if each of the sets is. -/
lemma bdd_above_union [semilattice_sup γ] {s t : set γ} :
bdd_above (s ∪ t) ↔ bdd_above s ∧ bdd_above t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.mono $ subset_union_left s t, h.mono $ subset_union_right s t⟩,
λ h, h.1.union h.2⟩
lemma bdd_below.union [semilattice_inf γ] {s t : set γ} :
bdd_below s → bdd_below t → bdd_below (s ∪ t) :=
@bdd_above.union (order_dual γ) _ s t
/--The union of two sets is bounded above if and only if each of the sets is.-/
lemma bdd_below_union [semilattice_inf γ] {s t : set γ} :
bdd_below (s ∪ t) ↔ bdd_below s ∧ bdd_below t :=
@bdd_above_union (order_dual γ) _ s t
/-- If `a` is the least upper bound of `s` and `b` is the least upper bound of `t`,
then `a ⊔ b` is the least upper bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
lemma is_lub.union [semilattice_sup γ] {a b : γ} {s t : set γ}
(hs : is_lub s a) (ht : is_lub t b) :
is_lub (s ∪ t) (a ⊔ b) :=
⟨assume c h, h.cases_on (λ h, le_sup_left_of_le $ hs.left h) (λ h, le_sup_right_of_le $ ht.left h),
assume c hc, sup_le
(hs.right $ assume d hd, hc $ or.inl hd) (ht.right $ assume d hd, hc $ or.inr hd)⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest lower bound of `s` and `b` is the greatest lower bound of `t`,
then `a ⊓ b` is the greatest lower bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
lemma is_glb.union [semilattice_inf γ] {a₁ a₂ : γ} {s t : set γ}
(hs : is_glb s a₁) (ht : is_glb t a₂) :
is_glb (s ∪ t) (a₁ ⊓ a₂) :=
@is_lub.union (order_dual γ) _ _ _ _ _ hs ht
/-- If `a` is the least element of `s` and `b` is the least element of `t`,
then `min a b` is the least element of `s ∪ t`. -/
lemma is_least.union [linear_order γ] {a b : γ} {s t : set γ}
(ha : is_least s a) (hb : is_least t b) : is_least (s ∪ t) (min a b) :=
⟨by cases (le_total a b) with h h; simp [h, ha.1, hb.1],
(ha.is_glb.union hb.is_glb).1⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of `s` and `b` is the greatest element of `t`,
then `max a b` is the greatest element of `s ∪ t`. -/
lemma is_greatest.union [linear_order γ] {a b : γ} {s t : set γ}
(ha : is_greatest s a) (hb : is_greatest t b) : is_greatest (s ∪ t) (max a b) :=
⟨by cases (le_total a b) with h h; simp [h, ha.1, hb.1],
(ha.is_lub.union hb.is_lub).1⟩
lemma is_lub.inter_Ici_of_mem [linear_order γ] {s : set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : is_lub s a)
(hb : b ∈ s) : is_lub (s ∩ Ici b) a :=
⟨λ x hx, ha.1 hx.1, λ c hc, have hbc : b ≤ c, from hc ⟨hb, le_rfl⟩,
ha.2 $ λ x hx, (le_total x b).elim (λ hxb, hxb.trans hbc) $ λ hbx, hc ⟨hx, hbx⟩⟩
lemma is_glb.inter_Iic_of_mem [linear_order γ] {s : set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : is_glb s a)
(hb : b ∈ s) : is_glb (s ∩ Iic b) a :=
@is_lub.inter_Ici_of_mem (order_dual γ) _ _ _ _ ha hb
/-!
### Specific sets
#### Unbounded intervals
-/
lemma is_least_Ici : is_least (Ici a) a := ⟨left_mem_Ici, λ x, id⟩
lemma is_greatest_Iic : is_greatest (Iic a) a := ⟨right_mem_Iic, λ x, id⟩
lemma is_lub_Iic : is_lub (Iic a) a := is_greatest_Iic.is_lub
lemma is_glb_Ici : is_glb (Ici a) a := is_least_Ici.is_glb
lemma upper_bounds_Iic : upper_bounds (Iic a) = Ici a := is_lub_Iic.upper_bounds_eq
lemma lower_bounds_Ici : lower_bounds (Ici a) = Iic a := is_glb_Ici.lower_bounds_eq
lemma bdd_above_Iic : bdd_above (Iic a) := is_lub_Iic.bdd_above
lemma bdd_below_Ici : bdd_below (Ici a) := is_glb_Ici.bdd_below
lemma bdd_above_Iio : bdd_above (Iio a) := ⟨a, λ x hx, le_of_lt hx⟩
lemma bdd_below_Ioi : bdd_below (Ioi a) := ⟨a, λ x hx, le_of_lt hx⟩
section
variables [linear_order γ] [densely_ordered γ]
lemma is_lub_Iio {a : γ} : is_lub (Iio a) a :=
⟨λ x hx, le_of_lt hx, λ y hy, le_of_forall_ge_of_dense hy⟩
lemma is_glb_Ioi {a : γ} : is_glb (Ioi a) a := @is_lub_Iio (order_dual γ) _ _ a
lemma upper_bounds_Iio {a : γ} : upper_bounds (Iio a) = Ici a := is_lub_Iio.upper_bounds_eq
lemma lower_bounds_Ioi {a : γ} : lower_bounds (Ioi a) = Iic a := is_glb_Ioi.lower_bounds_eq
end
/-!
#### Singleton
-/
lemma is_greatest_singleton : is_greatest {a} a :=
⟨mem_singleton a, λ x hx, le_of_eq $ eq_of_mem_singleton hx⟩
lemma is_least_singleton : is_least {a} a :=
@is_greatest_singleton (order_dual α) _ a
lemma is_lub_singleton : is_lub {a} a := is_greatest_singleton.is_lub
lemma is_glb_singleton : is_glb {a} a := is_least_singleton.is_glb
lemma bdd_above_singleton : bdd_above ({a} : set α) := is_lub_singleton.bdd_above
lemma bdd_below_singleton : bdd_below ({a} : set α) := is_glb_singleton.bdd_below
@[simp] lemma upper_bounds_singleton : upper_bounds {a} = Ici a := is_lub_singleton.upper_bounds_eq
@[simp] lemma lower_bounds_singleton : lower_bounds {a} = Iic a := is_glb_singleton.lower_bounds_eq
/-!
#### Bounded intervals
-/
lemma bdd_above_Icc : bdd_above (Icc a b) := ⟨b, λ _, and.right⟩
lemma bdd_below_Icc : bdd_below (Icc a b) := ⟨a, λ _, and.left⟩
lemma bdd_above_Ico : bdd_above (Ico a b) := bdd_above_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
lemma bdd_below_Ico : bdd_below (Ico a b) := bdd_below_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
lemma bdd_above_Ioc : bdd_above (Ioc a b) := bdd_above_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
lemma bdd_below_Ioc : bdd_below (Ioc a b) := bdd_below_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
lemma bdd_above_Ioo : bdd_above (Ioo a b) := bdd_above_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
lemma bdd_below_Ioo : bdd_below (Ioo a b) := bdd_below_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
lemma is_greatest_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : is_greatest (Icc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Icc.2 h, λ x, and.right⟩
lemma is_lub_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : is_lub (Icc a b) b := (is_greatest_Icc h).is_lub
lemma upper_bounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : upper_bounds (Icc a b) = Ici b :=
(is_lub_Icc h).upper_bounds_eq
lemma is_least_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : is_least (Icc a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Icc.2 h, λ x, and.left⟩
lemma is_glb_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : is_glb (Icc a b) a := (is_least_Icc h).is_glb
lemma lower_bounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : lower_bounds (Icc a b) = Iic a :=
(is_glb_Icc h).lower_bounds_eq
lemma is_greatest_Ioc (h : a < b) : is_greatest (Ioc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Ioc.2 h, λ x, and.right⟩
lemma is_lub_Ioc (h : a < b) : is_lub (Ioc a b) b :=
(is_greatest_Ioc h).is_lub
lemma upper_bounds_Ioc (h : a < b) : upper_bounds (Ioc a b) = Ici b :=
(is_lub_Ioc h).upper_bounds_eq
lemma is_least_Ico (h : a < b) : is_least (Ico a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ico.2 h, λ x, and.left⟩
lemma is_glb_Ico (h : a < b) : is_glb (Ico a b) a :=
(is_least_Ico h).is_glb
lemma lower_bounds_Ico (h : a < b) : lower_bounds (Ico a b) = Iic a :=
(is_glb_Ico h).lower_bounds_eq
section
variables [semilattice_sup γ] [densely_ordered γ]
lemma is_glb_Ioo {a b : γ} (h : a < b) :
is_glb (Ioo a b) a :=
⟨λ x hx, hx.1.le, λ x hx,
begin
cases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_sup_right : a ≤ x ⊔ a) with h₁ h₂,
{ exact h₁.symm ▸ le_sup_left },
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between h₂,
apply (not_lt_of_le (sup_le (hx ⟨lty, ylt.trans_le (sup_le _ h.le)⟩) lty.le) ylt).elim,
obtain ⟨u, au, ub⟩ := exists_between h,
apply (hx ⟨au, ub⟩).trans ub.le,
end⟩
lemma lower_bounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lower_bounds (Ioo a b) = Iic a :=
(is_glb_Ioo hab).lower_bounds_eq
lemma is_glb_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : is_glb (Ioc a b) a :=
(is_glb_Ioo hab).of_subset_of_superset (is_glb_Icc hab.le) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Ioc_subset_Icc_self
lemma lower_bound_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lower_bounds (Ioc a b) = Iic a :=
(is_glb_Ioc hab).lower_bounds_eq
end
section
variables [semilattice_inf γ] [densely_ordered γ]
lemma is_lub_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : is_lub (Ioo a b) b :=
by simpa only [dual_Ioo] using @is_glb_Ioo (order_dual γ) _ _ b a hab
lemma upper_bounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upper_bounds (Ioo a b) = Ici b :=
(is_lub_Ioo hab).upper_bounds_eq
lemma is_lub_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : is_lub (Ico a b) b :=
by simpa only [dual_Ioc] using @is_glb_Ioc (order_dual γ) _ _ b a hab
lemma upper_bounds_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upper_bounds (Ico a b) = Ici b :=
(is_lub_Ico hab).upper_bounds_eq
end
lemma bdd_below_iff_subset_Ici : bdd_below s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Ici a := iff.rfl
lemma bdd_above_iff_subset_Iic : bdd_above s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Iic a := iff.rfl
lemma bdd_below_bdd_above_iff_subset_Icc : bdd_below s ∧ bdd_above s ↔ ∃ a b, s ⊆ Icc a b :=
by simp only [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, subset_inter_iff, bdd_below_iff_subset_Ici,
bdd_above_iff_subset_Iic, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_and_distrib_right]
/-!
### Univ
-/
lemma order_top.upper_bounds_univ [order_top γ] : upper_bounds (univ : set γ) = {⊤} :=
set.ext $ λ b, iff.trans ⟨λ hb, top_unique $ hb trivial, λ hb x hx, hb.symm ▸ le_top⟩
mem_singleton_iff.symm
lemma is_greatest_univ [order_top γ] : is_greatest (univ : set γ) ⊤ :=
by simp only [is_greatest, order_top.upper_bounds_univ, mem_univ, mem_singleton, true_and]
lemma is_lub_univ [order_top γ] : is_lub (univ : set γ) ⊤ :=
is_greatest_univ.is_lub
lemma order_bot.lower_bounds_univ [order_bot γ] : lower_bounds (univ : set γ) = {⊥} :=
@order_top.upper_bounds_univ (order_dual γ) _
lemma is_least_univ [order_bot γ] : is_least (univ : set γ) ⊥ :=
@is_greatest_univ (order_dual γ) _
lemma is_glb_univ [order_bot γ] : is_glb (univ : set γ) ⊥ :=
is_least_univ.is_glb
lemma no_top_order.upper_bounds_univ [no_top_order α] : upper_bounds (univ : set α) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ λ b hb, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := no_top b in
not_le_of_lt hx (hb trivial)
lemma no_bot_order.lower_bounds_univ [no_bot_order α] : lower_bounds (univ : set α) = ∅ :=
@no_top_order.upper_bounds_univ (order_dual α) _ _
/-!
### Empty set
-/
@[simp] lemma upper_bounds_empty : upper_bounds (∅ : set α) = univ :=
by simp only [upper_bounds, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_set_of_eq, ball_empty_iff, forall_true_iff]
@[simp] lemma lower_bounds_empty : lower_bounds (∅ : set α) = univ :=
@upper_bounds_empty (order_dual α) _
@[simp] lemma bdd_above_empty [nonempty α] : bdd_above (∅ : set α) :=
by simp only [bdd_above, upper_bounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp] lemma bdd_below_empty [nonempty α] : bdd_below (∅ : set α) :=
by simp only [bdd_below, lower_bounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
lemma is_glb_empty [order_top γ] : is_glb ∅ (⊤:γ) :=
by simp only [is_glb, lower_bounds_empty, is_greatest_univ]
lemma is_lub_empty [order_bot γ] : is_lub ∅ (⊥:γ) :=
@is_glb_empty (order_dual γ) _
lemma is_lub.nonempty [no_bot_order α] (hs : is_lub s a) : s.nonempty :=
let ⟨a', ha'⟩ := no_bot a in
ne_empty_iff_nonempty.1 $ assume h,
have a ≤ a', from hs.right $ by simp only [h, upper_bounds_empty],
not_le_of_lt ha' this
lemma is_glb.nonempty [no_top_order α] (hs : is_glb s a) : s.nonempty :=
@is_lub.nonempty (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ hs
lemma nonempty_of_not_bdd_above [ha : nonempty α] (h : ¬bdd_above s) : s.nonempty :=
nonempty.elim ha $ λ x, (not_bdd_above_iff'.1 h x).imp $ λ a ha, ha.fst
lemma nonempty_of_not_bdd_below [ha : nonempty α] (h : ¬bdd_below s) : s.nonempty :=
@nonempty_of_not_bdd_above (order_dual α) _ _ _ h
/-!
### insert
-/
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness above. -/
@[simp] lemma bdd_above_insert [semilattice_sup γ] (a : γ) {s : set γ} :
bdd_above (insert a s) ↔ bdd_above s :=
by simp only [insert_eq, bdd_above_union, bdd_above_singleton, true_and]
lemma bdd_above.insert [semilattice_sup γ] (a : γ) {s : set γ} (hs : bdd_above s) :
bdd_above (insert a s) :=
(bdd_above_insert a).2 hs
/--Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness below.-/
@[simp] lemma bdd_below_insert [semilattice_inf γ] (a : γ) {s : set γ} :
bdd_below (insert a s) ↔ bdd_below s :=
by simp only [insert_eq, bdd_below_union, bdd_below_singleton, true_and]
lemma bdd_below.insert [semilattice_inf γ] (a : γ) {s : set γ} (hs : bdd_below s) :
bdd_below (insert a s) :=
(bdd_below_insert a).2 hs
lemma is_lub.insert [semilattice_sup γ] (a) {b} {s : set γ} (hs : is_lub s b) :
is_lub (insert a s) (a ⊔ b) :=
by { rw insert_eq, exact is_lub_singleton.union hs }
lemma is_glb.insert [semilattice_inf γ] (a) {b} {s : set γ} (hs : is_glb s b) :
is_glb (insert a s) (a ⊓ b) :=
by { rw insert_eq, exact is_glb_singleton.union hs }
lemma is_greatest.insert [linear_order γ] (a) {b} {s : set γ} (hs : is_greatest s b) :
is_greatest (insert a s) (max a b) :=
by { rw insert_eq, exact is_greatest_singleton.union hs }
lemma is_least.insert [linear_order γ] (a) {b} {s : set γ} (hs : is_least s b) :
is_least (insert a s) (min a b) :=
by { rw insert_eq, exact is_least_singleton.union hs }
@[simp] lemma upper_bounds_insert (a : α) (s : set α) :
upper_bounds (insert a s) = Ici a ∩ upper_bounds s :=
by rw [insert_eq, upper_bounds_union, upper_bounds_singleton]
@[simp] lemma lower_bounds_insert (a : α) (s : set α) :
lower_bounds (insert a s) = Iic a ∩ lower_bounds s :=
by rw [insert_eq, lower_bounds_union, lower_bounds_singleton]
/-- When there is a global maximum, every set is bounded above. -/
@[simp] protected lemma order_top.bdd_above [order_top γ] (s : set γ) : bdd_above s :=
⟨⊤, assume a ha, order_top.le_top a⟩
/-- When there is a global minimum, every set is bounded below. -/
@[simp] protected lemma order_bot.bdd_below [order_bot γ] (s : set γ) : bdd_below s :=
⟨⊥, assume a ha, order_bot.bot_le a⟩
/-!
### Pair
-/
lemma is_lub_pair [semilattice_sup γ] {a b : γ} : is_lub {a, b} (a ⊔ b) :=
is_lub_singleton.insert _
lemma is_glb_pair [semilattice_inf γ] {a b : γ} : is_glb {a, b} (a ⊓ b) :=
is_glb_singleton.insert _
lemma is_least_pair [linear_order γ] {a b : γ} : is_least {a, b} (min a b) :=
is_least_singleton.insert _
lemma is_greatest_pair [linear_order γ] {a b : γ} : is_greatest {a, b} (max a b) :=
is_greatest_singleton.insert _
end
/-!
### (In)equalities with the least upper bound and the greatest lower bound
-/
section preorder
variables [preorder α] {s : set α} {a b : α}
lemma lower_bounds_le_upper_bounds (ha : a ∈ lower_bounds s) (hb : b ∈ upper_bounds s) :
s.nonempty → a ≤ b
| ⟨c, hc⟩ := le_trans (ha hc) (hb hc)
lemma is_glb_le_is_lub (ha : is_glb s a) (hb : is_lub s b) (hs : s.nonempty) : a ≤ b :=
lower_bounds_le_upper_bounds ha.1 hb.1 hs
lemma is_lub_lt_iff (ha : is_lub s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ upper_bounds s, c < b :=
⟨λ hb, ⟨a, ha.1, hb⟩, λ ⟨c, hcs, hcb⟩, lt_of_le_of_lt (ha.2 hcs) hcb⟩
lemma lt_is_glb_iff (ha : is_glb s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ lower_bounds s, b < c :=
@is_lub_lt_iff (order_dual α) _ s _ _ ha
lemma le_of_is_lub_le_is_glb {x y} (ha : is_glb s a) (hb : is_lub s b) (hab : b ≤ a)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y :=
calc x ≤ b : hb.1 hx
... ≤ a : hab
... ≤ y : ha.1 hy
end preorder
section partial_order
variables [partial_order α] {s : set α} {a b : α}
lemma is_least.unique (Ha : is_least s a) (Hb : is_least s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Ha.right Hb.left) (Hb.right Ha.left)
lemma is_least.is_least_iff_eq (Ha : is_least s a) : is_least s b ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro Ha.unique (assume h, h ▸ Ha)
lemma is_greatest.unique (Ha : is_greatest s a) (Hb : is_greatest s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Hb.right Ha.left) (Ha.right Hb.left)
lemma is_greatest.is_greatest_iff_eq (Ha : is_greatest s a) : is_greatest s b ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro Ha.unique (assume h, h ▸ Ha)
lemma is_lub.unique (Ha : is_lub s a) (Hb : is_lub s b) : a = b :=
Ha.unique Hb
lemma is_glb.unique (Ha : is_glb s a) (Hb : is_glb s b) : a = b :=
Ha.unique Hb
lemma set.subsingleton_of_is_lub_le_is_glb (Ha : is_glb s a) (Hb : is_lub s b) (hab : b ≤ a) :
s.subsingleton :=
λ x hx y hy, le_antisymm (le_of_is_lub_le_is_glb Ha Hb hab hx hy)
(le_of_is_lub_le_is_glb Ha Hb hab hy hx)
lemma is_glb_lt_is_lub_of_ne (Ha : is_glb s a) (Hb : is_lub s b)
{x y} (Hx : x ∈ s) (Hy : y ∈ s) (Hxy : x ≠ y) :
a < b :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.2
⟨lower_bounds_le_upper_bounds Ha.1 Hb.1 ⟨x, Hx⟩,
λ hab, Hxy $ set.subsingleton_of_is_lub_le_is_glb Ha Hb hab Hx Hy⟩
end partial_order
section linear_order
variables [linear_order α] {s : set α} {a b : α}
lemma lt_is_lub_iff (h : is_lub s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, b < c :=
by simp only [← not_le, is_lub_le_iff h, mem_upper_bounds, not_forall]
lemma is_glb_lt_iff (h : is_glb s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, c < b :=
@lt_is_lub_iff (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ h
lemma is_lub.exists_between (h : is_lub s a) (hb : b < a) :
∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c ≤ a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (lt_is_lub_iff h).1 hb in ⟨c, hcs, hbc, h.1 hcs⟩
lemma is_lub.exists_between' (h : is_lub s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : b < a) :
∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c < a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca⟩ := h.exists_between hb
in ⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca.lt_of_ne $ λ hac, h' $ hac ▸ hcs⟩
lemma is_glb.exists_between (h : is_glb s a) (hb : a < b) :
∃ c ∈ s, a ≤ c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (is_glb_lt_iff h).1 hb in ⟨c, hcs, h.1 hcs, hbc⟩
lemma is_glb.exists_between' (h : is_glb s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : a < b) :
∃ c ∈ s, a < c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hac, hcb⟩ := h.exists_between hb
in ⟨c, hcs, hac.lt_of_ne $ λ hac, h' $ hac.symm ▸ hcs, hcb⟩
end linear_order
/-!
### Least upper bound and the greatest lower bound in linear ordered additive commutative groups
-/
section linear_ordered_add_comm_group
variables [linear_ordered_add_comm_group α] {s : set α} {a ε : α}
lemma is_glb.exists_between_self_add (h : is_glb s a) (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ b ∧ b < a + ε :=
h.exists_between $ lt_add_of_pos_right _ hε
lemma is_glb.exists_between_self_add' (h : is_glb s a) (h₂ : a ∉ s) (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ b ∈ s, a < b ∧ b < a + ε :=
h.exists_between' h₂ $ lt_add_of_pos_right _ hε
lemma is_lub.exists_between_sub_self (h : is_lub s a) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ b ∈ s, a - ε < b ∧ b ≤ a :=
h.exists_between $ sub_lt_self _ hε
lemma is_lub.exists_between_sub_self' (h : is_lub s a) (h₂ : a ∉ s) (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ b ∈ s, a - ε < b ∧ b < a :=
h.exists_between' h₂ $ sub_lt_self _ hε
end linear_ordered_add_comm_group
/-!
### Images of upper/lower bounds under monotone functions
-/
namespace monotone
variables [preorder α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} (Hf : monotone f) {a : α} {s : set α}
lemma mem_upper_bounds_image (Ha : a ∈ upper_bounds s) :
f a ∈ upper_bounds (f '' s) :=
ball_image_of_ball (assume x H, Hf (Ha ‹x ∈ s›))
lemma mem_lower_bounds_image (Ha : a ∈ lower_bounds s) :
f a ∈ lower_bounds (f '' s) :=
ball_image_of_ball (assume x H, Hf (Ha ‹x ∈ s›))
/-- The image under a monotone function of a set which is bounded above is bounded above. -/
lemma map_bdd_above (hf : monotone f) : bdd_above s → bdd_above (f '' s)
| ⟨C, hC⟩ := ⟨f C, hf.mem_upper_bounds_image hC⟩
/-- The image under a monotone function of a set which is bounded below is bounded below. -/
lemma map_bdd_below (hf : monotone f) : bdd_below s → bdd_below (f '' s)
| ⟨C, hC⟩ := ⟨f C, hf.mem_lower_bounds_image hC⟩
/-- A monotone map sends a least element of a set to a least element of its image. -/
lemma map_is_least (Ha : is_least s a) : is_least (f '' s) (f a) :=
⟨mem_image_of_mem _ Ha.1, Hf.mem_lower_bounds_image Ha.2⟩
/-- A monotone map sends a greatest element of a set to a greatest element of its image. -/
lemma map_is_greatest (Ha : is_greatest s a) : is_greatest (f '' s) (f a) :=
⟨mem_image_of_mem _ Ha.1, Hf.mem_upper_bounds_image Ha.2⟩
lemma is_lub_image_le (Ha : is_lub s a) {b : β} (Hb : is_lub (f '' s) b) :
b ≤ f a :=
Hb.2 (Hf.mem_upper_bounds_image Ha.1)
lemma le_is_glb_image (Ha : is_glb s a) {b : β} (Hb : is_glb (f '' s) b) :
f a ≤ b :=
Hb.2 (Hf.mem_lower_bounds_image Ha.1)
end monotone
lemma is_glb.of_image [preorder α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y)
{s : set α} {x : α} (hx : is_glb (f '' s) (f x)) :
is_glb s x :=
⟨λ y hy, hf.1 $ hx.1 $ mem_image_of_mem _ hy,
λ y hy, hf.1 $ hx.2 $ monotone.mem_lower_bounds_image (λ x y, hf.2) hy⟩
lemma is_lub.of_image [preorder α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y)
{s : set α} {x : α} (hx : is_lub (f '' s) (f x)) :
is_lub s x :=
@is_glb.of_image (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ f (λ x y, hf) _ _ hx
|
19bb397ab1ee2f9ee16fe26fc5639c8205a2292f | b3fced0f3ff82d577384fe81653e47df68bb2fa1 | /src/meta/expr.lean | 079734ba65a645a570cc7095a4573ad191911180 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ratmice/mathlib | 93b251ef5df08b6fd55074650ff47fdcc41a4c75 | 3a948a6a4cd5968d60e15ed914b1ad2f4423af8d | refs/heads/master | 1,599,240,104,318 | 1,572,981,183,000 | 1,572,981,183,000 | 219,830,178 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,572,980,897,000 | 1,572,980,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,412 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison, Keeley Hoek, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import data.string.defs
/-!
# Additional operations on expr and related types
This file defines basic operations on the types expr, name, declaration, level, environment.
This file is mostly for non-tactics. Tactics should generally be placed in `tactic.core`.
## Tags
expr, name, declaration, level, environment, meta, metaprogramming, tactic
-/
namespace binder_info
instance : inhabited binder_info := ⟨ binder_info.default ⟩
/-- The brackets corresponding to a given binder_info. -/
def brackets : binder_info → string × string
| binder_info.implicit := ("{", "}")
| binder_info.strict_implicit := ("{{", "}}")
| binder_info.inst_implicit := ("[", "]")
| _ := ("(", ")")
end binder_info
namespace name
/-- Find the largest prefix `n` of a `name` such that `f n ≠ none`, then replace this prefix
with the value of `f n`. -/
def map_prefix (f : name → option name) : name → name
| anonymous := anonymous
| (mk_string s n') := (f (mk_string s n')).get_or_else (mk_string s $ map_prefix n')
| (mk_numeral d n') := (f (mk_numeral d n')).get_or_else (mk_numeral d $ map_prefix n')
/-- If `nm` is a simple name (having only one string component) starting with `_`, then `deinternalize_field nm` removes the underscore. Otherwise, it does nothing. -/
meta def deinternalize_field : name → name
| (mk_string s name.anonymous) :=
let i := s.mk_iterator in
if i.curr = '_' then i.next.next_to_string else s
| n := n
/-- `get_nth_prefix nm n` removes the last `n` components from `nm` -/
meta def get_nth_prefix : name → ℕ → name
| nm 0 := nm
| nm (n + 1) := get_nth_prefix nm.get_prefix n
/-- Auxilliary definition for `pop_nth_prefix` -/
private meta def pop_nth_prefix_aux : name → ℕ → name × ℕ
| anonymous n := (anonymous, 1)
| nm n := let (pfx, height) := pop_nth_prefix_aux nm.get_prefix n in
if height ≤ n then (anonymous, height + 1)
else (nm.update_prefix pfx, height + 1)
/-- Pops the top `n` prefixes from the given name. -/
meta def pop_nth_prefix (nm : name) (n : ℕ) : name :=
prod.fst $ pop_nth_prefix_aux nm n
/-- Pop the prefix of a name -/
meta def pop_prefix (n : name) : name :=
pop_nth_prefix n 1
/-- Auxilliary definition for `from_components` -/
private def from_components_aux : name → list string → name
| n [] := n
| n (s :: rest) := from_components_aux (name.mk_string s n) rest
/-- Build a name from components. For example `from_components ["foo","bar"]` becomes
``` `foo.bar``` -/
def from_components : list string → name :=
from_components_aux name.anonymous
/-- `name`s can contain numeral pieces, which are not legal names
when typed/passed directly to the parser. We turn an arbitrary
name into a legal identifier name by turning the numbers to strings. -/
meta def sanitize_name : name → name
| name.anonymous := name.anonymous
| (name.mk_string s p) := name.mk_string s $ sanitize_name p
| (name.mk_numeral s p) := name.mk_string sformat!"n{s}" $ sanitize_name p
/-- Append a string to the last component of a name -/
def append_suffix : name → string → name
| (mk_string s n) s' := mk_string (s ++ s') n
| n _ := n
/-- The first component of a name, turning a number to a string -/
meta def head : name → string
| (mk_string s anonymous) := s
| (mk_string s p) := head p
| (mk_numeral n p) := head p
| anonymous := "[anonymous]"
/-- Tests whether the first component of a name is `"_private"` -/
meta def is_private (n : name) : bool :=
n.head = "_private"
/-- Get the last component of a name, and convert it to a string. -/
meta def last : name → string
| (mk_string s _) := s
| (mk_numeral n _) := repr n
| anonymous := "[anonymous]"
/-- Returns the number of characters used to print all the string components of a name,
including periods between name segments. Ignores numerical parts of a name. -/
meta def length : name → ℕ
| (mk_string s anonymous) := s.length
| (mk_string s p) := s.length + 1 + p.length
| (mk_numeral n p) := p.length
| anonymous := "[anonymous]".length
/-- checks whether `nm` has a prefix (including itself) such that P is true -/
def has_prefix (P : name → bool) : name → bool
| anonymous := ff
| (mk_string s nm) := P (mk_string s nm) ∨ has_prefix nm
| (mk_numeral s nm) := P (mk_numeral s nm) ∨ has_prefix nm
end name
namespace level
/-- Tests whether a universe level is non-zero for all assignments of its variables -/
meta def nonzero : level → bool
| (succ _) := tt
| (max l₁ l₂) := l₁.nonzero || l₂.nonzero
| (imax _ l₂) := l₂.nonzero
| _ := ff
end level
/-- The type of binders containing a name, the binding info and the binding type -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
meta structure binder :=
(name : name)
(info : binder_info)
(type : expr)
namespace binder
/-- Turn a binder into a string. Uses expr.to_string for the type. -/
protected meta def to_string (b : binder) : string :=
let (l, r) := b.info.brackets in
l ++ b.name.to_string ++ " : " ++ b.type.to_string ++ r
open tactic
meta instance : inhabited binder := ⟨⟨default _, default _, default _⟩⟩
meta instance : has_to_string binder := ⟨ binder.to_string ⟩
meta instance : has_to_format binder := ⟨ λ b, b.to_string ⟩
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format binder :=
⟨ λ b, let (l, r) := b.info.brackets in
(λ e, l ++ b.name.to_string ++ " : " ++ e ++ r) <$> pp b.type ⟩
end binder
/- converting between expressions and numerals -/
/--
`nat.mk_numeral n` embeds `n` as a numeral expression inside a type with 0, 1, and +.
`type`: an expression representing the target type. This must live in Type 0.
`has_zero`, `has_one`, `has_add`: expressions of the type `has_zero %%type`, etc.
-/
meta def nat.mk_numeral (type has_zero has_one has_add : expr) : ℕ → expr :=
let z : expr := `(@has_zero.zero.{0} %%type %%has_zero),
o : expr := `(@has_one.one.{0} %%type %%has_one) in
nat.binary_rec z
(λ b n e, if n = 0 then o else
if b then `(@bit1.{0} %%type %%has_one %%has_add %%e)
else `(@bit0.{0} %%type %%has_add %%e))
/--
`int.mk_numeral z` embeds `z` as a numeral expression inside a type with 0, 1, +, and -.
`type`: an expression representing the target type. This must live in Type 0.
`has_zero`, `has_one`, `has_add`, `has_neg`: expressions of the type `has_zero %%type`, etc.
-/
meta def int.mk_numeral (type has_zero has_one has_add has_neg : expr) : ℤ → expr
| (int.of_nat n) := n.mk_numeral type has_zero has_one has_add
| -[1+n] := let ne := (n+1).mk_numeral type has_zero has_one has_add in
`(@has_neg.neg.{0} %%type %%has_neg %%ne)
namespace expr
/-- Turns an expression into a positive natural number, assuming it is only built up from
`has_one.one`, `bit0` and `bit1`. -/
protected meta def to_pos_nat : expr → option ℕ
| `(has_one.one _) := some 1
| `(bit0 %%e) := bit0 <$> e.to_pos_nat
| `(bit1 %%e) := bit1 <$> e.to_pos_nat
| _ := none
/-- Turns an expression into a natural number, assuming it is only built up from
`has_one.one`, `bit0`, `bit1` and `has_zero.zero`. -/
protected meta def to_nat : expr → option ℕ
| `(has_zero.zero _) := some 0
| e := e.to_pos_nat
/-- Turns an expression into a integer, assuming it is only built up from
`has_one.one`, `bit0`, `bit1`, `has_zero.zero` and a optionally a single `has_neg.neg` as head. -/
protected meta def to_int : expr → option ℤ
| `(has_neg.neg %%e) := do n ← e.to_nat, some (-n)
| e := coe <$> e.to_nat
end expr
namespace expr
open tactic
/-- Apply a function to each constant (inductive type, defined function etc) in an expression. -/
protected meta def apply_replacement_fun (f : name → name) (e : expr) : expr :=
e.replace $ λ e d,
match e with
| expr.const n ls := some $ expr.const (f n) ls
| _ := none
end
/-- Tests whether an expression is a meta-variable. -/
meta def is_mvar : expr → bool
| (mvar _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Tests whether an expression is a sort. -/
meta def is_sort : expr → bool
| (sort _) := tt
| e := ff
/-- Returns a list of all local constants in an expression (without duplicates). -/
meta def list_local_consts (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_local_constant then insert e' es else es)
/-- Returns a name_set of all constants in an expression. -/
meta def list_constant (e : expr) : name_set :=
e.fold mk_name_set (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_constant then es.insert e'.const_name else es)
/-- Returns a list of all meta-variables in an expression (without duplicates). -/
meta def list_meta_vars (e : expr) : list expr :=
e.fold [] (λ e' _ es, if e'.is_mvar then insert e' es else es)
/-- Returns a name_set of all constants in an expression starting with a certain prefix. -/
meta def list_names_with_prefix (pre : name) (e : expr) : name_set :=
e.fold mk_name_set $ λ e' _ l,
match e' with
| expr.const n _ := if n.get_prefix = pre then l.insert n else l
| _ := l
end
/-- Returns true if `e` contains a name `n` where `p n` is true.
Returns `true` if `p name.anonymous` is true -/
meta def contains_constant (e : expr) (p : name → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : bool :=
e.fold ff (λ e' _ b, if p (e'.const_name) then tt else b)
/--
is_num_eq n1 n2 returns true if n1 and n2 are both numerals with the same numeral structure,
ignoring differences in type and type class arguments.
-/
meta def is_num_eq : expr → expr → bool
| `(@has_zero.zero _ _) `(@has_zero.zero _ _) := tt
| `(@has_one.one _ _) `(@has_one.one _ _) := tt
| `(bit0 %%a) `(bit0 %%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(bit1 %%a) `(bit1 %%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(-%%a) `(-%%b) := a.is_num_eq b
| `(%%a/%%a') `(%%b/%%b') := a.is_num_eq b
| _ _ := ff
/-- Simplifies the expression `t` with the specified options.
The result is `(new_e, pr)` with the new expression `new_e` and a proof
`pr : e = new_e`. -/
meta def simp (t : expr)
(cfg : simp_config := {}) (discharger : tactic unit := failed)
(no_defaults := ff) (attr_names : list name := []) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) :
tactic (expr × expr) :=
do (s, to_unfold) ← mk_simp_set no_defaults attr_names hs,
simplify s to_unfold t cfg `eq discharger
/-- Definitionally simplifies the expression `t` with the specified options.
The result is the simplified expression. -/
meta def dsimp (t : expr)
(cfg : dsimp_config := {})
(no_defaults := ff) (attr_names : list name := []) (hs : list simp_arg_type := []) :
tactic expr :=
do (s, to_unfold) ← mk_simp_set no_defaults attr_names hs,
s.dsimplify to_unfold t cfg
/-- Auxilliary definition for `expr.pi_arity` -/
meta def pi_arity_aux : ℕ → expr → ℕ
| n (pi _ _ _ b) := pi_arity_aux (n + 1) b
| n e := n
/-- The arity of a pi-type. Does not perform any reduction of the expression.
In one application this was ~30 times quicker than `tactic.get_pi_arity`. -/
meta def pi_arity : expr → ℕ :=
pi_arity_aux 0
/-- Get the names of the bound variables by a sequence of pis or lambdas. -/
meta def binding_names : expr → list name
| (pi n _ _ e) := n :: e.binding_names
| (lam n _ _ e) := n :: e.binding_names
| e := []
/-- head-reduce a single let expression -/
meta def reduce_let : expr → expr
| (elet _ _ v b) := b.instantiate_var v
| e := e
/-- head-reduce all let expressions -/
meta def reduce_lets : expr → expr
| (elet _ _ v b) := reduce_lets $ b.instantiate_var v
| e := e
/-- Instantiate lambdas in the second argument by expressions from the first. -/
meta def instantiate_lambdas : list expr → expr → expr
| (e'::es) (lam n bi t e) := instantiate_lambdas es (e.instantiate_var e')
| _ e := e
/-- `instantiate_lambdas_or_apps es e` instantiates lambdas in `e` by expressions from `es`.
If the length of `es` is larger than the number of lambdas in `e`,
then the term is applied to the remaining terms.
Also reduces head let-expressions in `e`, including those after instantiating all lambdas. -/
meta def instantiate_lambdas_or_apps : list expr → expr → expr
| (v::es) (lam n bi t b) := instantiate_lambdas_or_apps es $ b.instantiate_var v
| es (elet _ _ v b) := instantiate_lambdas_or_apps es $ b.instantiate_var v
| es e := mk_app e es
/- Note [open expressions]:
Some declarations work with open expressions, i.e. an expr that has free variables.
Terms will free variables are not well-typed, and one should not use them in tactics like
`infer_type` or `unify`. You can still do syntactic analysis/manipulation on them.
The reason for working with open types is for performance: instantiating variables requires
iterating through the expression. In one performance test `pi_binders` was more than 6x
quicker than `mk_local_pis` (when applied to the type of all imported declarations 100x).
-/
/-- Get the codomain/target of a pi-type.
This definition doesn't Instantiate bound variables, and therefore produces a term that is open.-/
meta def pi_codomain : expr → expr -- see note [open expressions]
| (pi n bi d b) := pi_codomain b
| e := e
/-- Auxilliary defintion for `pi_binders`. -/
-- see note [open expressions]
meta def pi_binders_aux : list binder → expr → list binder × expr
| es (pi n bi d b) := pi_binders_aux (⟨n, bi, d⟩::es) b
| es e := (es, e)
/-- Get the binders and codomain of a pi-type.
This definition doesn't Instantiate bound variables, and therefore produces a term that is open.
The.tactic `get_pi_binders` in `tactic.core` does the same, but also instantiates the
free variables -/
meta def pi_binders (e : expr) : list binder × expr := -- see note [open expressions]
let (es, e) := pi_binders_aux [] e in (es.reverse, e)
/-- Auxilliary defintion for `get_app_fn_args`. -/
meta def get_app_fn_args_aux : list expr → expr → expr × list expr
| r (app f a) := get_app_fn_args_aux (a::r) f
| r e := (e, r)
/-- A combination of `get_app_fn` and `get_app_args`: lists both the
function and its arguments of an application -/
meta def get_app_fn_args : expr → expr × list expr :=
get_app_fn_args_aux []
/-- `drop_pis es e` instantiates the pis in `e` with the expressions from `es`. -/
meta def drop_pis : list expr → expr → tactic expr
| (list.cons v vs) (pi n bi d b) := do
t ← infer_type v,
guard (t =ₐ d),
drop_pis vs (b.instantiate_var v)
| [] e := return e
| _ _ := failed
/-- `mk_op_lst op empty [x1, x2, ...]` is defined as `op x1 (op x2 ...)`.
Returns `empty` if the list is empty. -/
meta def mk_op_lst (op : expr) (empty : expr) : list expr → expr
| [] := empty
| [e] := e
| (e :: es) := op e $ mk_op_lst es
/-- `mk_and_lst [x1, x2, ...]` is defined as `x1 ∧ (x2 ∧ ...)`, or `true` if the list is empty. -/
meta def mk_and_lst : list expr → expr := mk_op_lst `(and) `(true)
/-- `mk_or_lst [x1, x2, ...]` is defined as `x1 ∨ (x2 ∨ ...)`, or `false` if the list is empty. -/
meta def mk_or_lst : list expr → expr := mk_op_lst `(or) `(false)
end expr
namespace environment
/-- Tests whether a name is declared in the current file. Fixes an error in `in_current_file`
which returns `tt` for the four names `quot, quot.mk, quot.lift, quot.ind` -/
meta def in_current_file' (env : environment) (n : name) : bool :=
env.in_current_file n && (n ∉ [``quot, ``quot.mk, ``quot.lift, ``quot.ind])
/-- Tests whether `n` is an inductive type with one constructor without indices.
If so, returns the number of paramaters and the name of the constructor.
Otherwise, returns `none`. -/
meta def is_structure_like (env : environment) (n : name) : option (nat × name) :=
do guardb (env.is_inductive n),
d ← (env.get n).to_option,
[intro] ← pure (env.constructors_of n) | none,
guard (env.inductive_num_indices n = 0),
some (env.inductive_num_params n, intro)
/-- Tests whether `n` is a structure.
It will first test whether `n` is structure-like and then test that the first projection is
defined in the environment and is a projection. -/
meta def is_structure (env : environment) (n : name) : bool :=
option.is_some $ do
(nparams, intro) ← env.is_structure_like n,
di ← (env.get intro).to_option,
expr.pi x _ _ _ ← nparams.iterate
(λ e : option expr, do expr.pi _ _ _ body ← e | none, some body)
(some di.type) | none,
env.is_projection (n ++ x.deinternalize_field)
/-- Get all projections of the structure `n`. Returns `none` if `n` is not structure-like.
If `n` is not a structure, but is structure-like, this does not check whether the names
are existing declarations. -/
meta def get_projections (env : environment) (n : name) : option (list name) := do
(nparams, intro) ← env.is_structure_like n,
di ← (env.get intro).to_option,
tgt ← nparams.iterate
(λ e : option expr, do expr.pi _ _ _ body ← e | none, some body)
(some di.type) | none,
return $ tgt.binding_names.map (λ x, n ++ x.deinternalize_field)
/-- Tests whether `nm` is a generalized inductive type that is not a normal inductive type.
Note that `is_ginductive` returns `tt` even on regular inductive types.
This returns `tt` if `nm` is (part of a) mutually defined inductive type or a nested inductive
type. -/
meta def is_ginductive' (e : environment) (nm : name) : bool :=
e.is_ginductive nm ∧ ¬ e.is_inductive nm
/-- For all declarations `d` where `f d = some x` this adds `x` to the returned list. -/
meta def decl_filter_map {α : Type} (e : environment) (f : declaration → option α) : list α :=
e.fold [] $ λ d l, match f d with
| some r := r :: l
| none := l
end
/-- Maps `f` to all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def decl_map {α : Type} (e : environment) (f : declaration → α) : list α :=
e.decl_filter_map $ λ d, some (f d)
/-- Lists all declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_decls (e : environment) : list declaration :=
e.decl_map id
/-- Lists all trusted (non-meta) declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_trusted_decls (e : environment) : list declaration :=
e.decl_filter_map (λ d, if d.is_trusted then some d else none)
/-- Lists the name of all declarations in the environment -/
meta def get_decl_names (e : environment) : list name :=
e.decl_map declaration.to_name
/-- Fold a monad over all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def mfold {α : Type} {m : Type → Type} [monad m] (e : environment) (x : α)
(fn : declaration → α → m α) : m α :=
e.fold (return x) (λ d t, t >>= fn d)
/-- Filters all declarations in the environment. -/
meta def mfilter (e : environment) (test : declaration → tactic bool) : tactic (list declaration) :=
e.mfold [] $ λ d ds, do b ← test d, return $ if b then d::ds else ds
/-- Checks whether `s` is a prefix of the file where `n` is declared.
This is used to check whether `n` is declared in mathlib, where `s` is the mathlib directory. -/
meta def is_prefix_of_file (e : environment) (s : string) (n : name) : bool :=
s.is_prefix_of $ (e.decl_olean n).get_or_else ""
end environment
namespace expr
/- In this section we define the tactic `is_eta_expansion` which checks whether an expression
is an eta-expansion of a structure. (not to be confused with eta-expanion for `λ`). -/
open tactic
/-- `is_eta_expansion_of args univs l` checks whether for all elements `(nm, pr)` in `l` we have
`pr = nm.{univs} args`.
Used in `is_eta_expansion`, where `l` consists of the projections and the fields of the value we
want to eta-reduce. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_of (args : list expr) (univs : list level) (l : list (name × expr)) :
bool :=
l.all $ λ⟨proj, val⟩, val = (const proj univs).mk_app args
/-- `is_eta_expansion_test l` checks whether there is a list of expresions `args` such that for all
elements `(nm, pr)` in `l` we have `pr = nm args`. If so, returns the last element of `args`.
Used in `is_eta_expansion`, where `l` consists of the projections and the fields of the value we
want to eta-reduce. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_test : list (name × expr) → option expr
| [] := none
| (⟨proj, val⟩::l) :=
match val.get_app_fn with
| (const nm univs : expr) :=
if nm = proj then
let args := val.get_app_args in
let e := args.ilast in
if is_eta_expansion_of args univs l then some e else none
else
none
| _ := none
end
/-- `is_eta_expansion_aux val l` checks whether `val` can be eta-reduced to an expression `e`.
Here `l` is intended to consists of the projections and the fields of `val`.
This tactic calls `is_eta_expansion_test l`, but first removes all proofs from the list `l` and
afterward checks whether the retulting expression `e` unifies with `val`.
This last check is necessary, because `val` and `e` might have different types. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion_aux (val : expr) (l : list (name × expr)) : tactic (option expr) :=
do l' ← l.mfilter (λ⟨proj, val⟩, bnot <$> is_proof val),
match is_eta_expansion_test l' with
| some e := option.map (λ _, e) <$> try_core (unify e val)
| none := return none
end
/-- `is_eta_expansion val` checks whether there is an expression `e` such that `val` is the
eta-expansion of `e`.
With eta-expansion we here mean the eta-expansion of a structure, not of a function.
For example, the eta-expansion of `x : α × β` is `⟨x.1, x.2⟩`.
This assumes that `val` is a fully-applied application of the constructor of a structure.
This is useful to reduce expressions generated by the notation
`{ field_1 := _, ..other_structure }`
If `other_structure` is itself a field of the structure, then the elaborator will insert an
eta-expanded version of `other_structure`. -/
meta def is_eta_expansion (val : expr) : tactic (option expr) := do
e ← get_env,
type ← infer_type val,
projs ← e.get_projections type.get_app_fn.const_name,
let args := (val.get_app_args).drop type.get_app_args.length,
is_eta_expansion_aux val (projs.zip args)
end expr
namespace declaration
open tactic
protected meta def update_with_fun (f : name → name) (tgt : name) (decl : declaration) :
declaration :=
let decl := decl.update_name $ tgt in
let decl := decl.update_type $ decl.type.apply_replacement_fun f in
decl.update_value $ decl.value.apply_replacement_fun f
/-- Checks whether the declaration is declared in the current file.
This is a simple wrapper around `environment.in_current_file'`
Use `environment.in_current_file'` instead if performance matters. -/
meta def in_current_file (d : declaration) : tactic bool :=
do e ← get_env, return $ e.in_current_file' d.to_name
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a theorem -/
meta def is_theorem : declaration → bool
| (thm _ _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a constant -/
meta def is_constant : declaration → bool
| (cnst _ _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is a axiom -/
meta def is_axiom : declaration → bool
| (ax _ _ _) := tt
| _ := ff
/-- Checks whether a declaration is automatically generated in the environment.
There is no cheap way to check whether a declaration in the namespace of a generalized
inductive type is automatically generated, so for now we say that all of them are automatically
generated. -/
meta def is_auto_generated (e : environment) (d : declaration) : bool :=
e.is_constructor d.to_name ∨
(e.is_projection d.to_name).is_some ∨
(e.is_constructor d.to_name.get_prefix ∧
d.to_name.last ∈ ["inj", "inj_eq", "sizeof_spec", "inj_arrow"]) ∨
(e.is_inductive d.to_name.get_prefix ∧
d.to_name.last ∈ ["below", "binduction_on", "brec_on", "cases_on", "dcases_on", "drec_on", "drec",
"rec", "rec_on", "no_confusion", "no_confusion_type", "sizeof", "ibelow", "has_sizeof_inst"]) ∨
d.to_name.has_prefix (λ nm, e.is_ginductive' nm)
/-- Returns the list of universe levels of a declaration. -/
meta def univ_levels (d : declaration) : list level :=
d.univ_params.map level.param
end declaration
|
0b549b4cddad37587d6788d3e36ec1bdade1df15 | 3c693e12637d1cf47effc09ab5e21700d1278e73 | /src/elliptic_curves/basic.lean | 051aa76c4fac663546dc45c91109ace51316e9b4 | [] | no_license | ImperialCollegeLondon/Example-Lean-Projects | e731664ae046980921a69ccfeb2286674080c5bb | 87b27ba616eaf03f3642000829a481a1932dd08e | refs/heads/master | 1,685,399,670,721 | 1,623,092,696,000 | 1,623,092,696,000 | 275,571,570 | 19 | 1 | null | 1,593,361,524,000 | 1,593,344,124,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,953 | lean | import tactic
open_locale classical -- assume the law of the excluded middle
noncomputable theory -- because Lean can't calculate with an arbitrary field
-- "let k be a field"
variables {k : Type} [field k]
def disc (a1 a2 a3 a4 a6 : k) : k :=
-a6*a1^6 + a4*a3*a1^5 + ((-a3^2 - 12*a6)*a2 + a4^2)*a1^4 +
(8*a4*a3*a2 + (a3^3 + 36*a6*a3))*a1^3 + ((-8*a3^2 - 48*a6)*a2^2 + 8*a4^2*a2 +
(-30*a4*a3^2 + 72*a6*a4))*a1^2 + (16*a4*a3*a2^2 + (36*a3^3 + 144*a6*a3)*a2 - 96*a4^2*a3)*a1
+ ((-16*a3^2 - 64*a6)*a2^3 + 16*a4^2*a2^2 + (72*a4*a3^2 + 288*a6*a4)*a2 +
(-27*a3^4 - 216*a6*a3^2 + (-64*a4^3 - 432*a6^2)))
/-- An elliptic curve over a field -/
structure elliptic_curve (k : Type) [field k] :=
(a1 a2 a3 a4 a6 : k)
(disc_nonzero : disc a1 a2 a3 a4 a6 ≠ 0)
namespace elliptic_curve
/-- The set of points on an elliptic curve, considered as the affine
solutions plus an extra term "none" -/
def points (E : elliptic_curve k) := with_zero {P : k × k // let ⟨x, y⟩ := P in
y^2 + E.a1*x*y + E.a3*y = x^3 + E.a2*x^2 + E.a4*x + E.a6}
-- "let E be an elliptic curve over k"
variable (E : elliptic_curve k)
/-- notation 0 for the "extra point" we added -/
instance : has_zero (points E) := with_zero.has_zero
def scale (E : elliptic_curve k) (d : k) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
elliptic_curve k :=
{ a1 := d*E.a1,
a2 := d^2*E.a2,
a3 := d^3*E.a3,
a4 := d^4*E.a4,
a6 := d^6*E.a6,
disc_nonzero := begin
have hE : disc E.a1 E.a2 E.a3 E.a4 E.a6 ≠ 0,
exact E.disc_nonzero,
have h12 : d^12*disc E.a1 E.a2 E.a3 E.a4 E.a6 ≠ 0,
refine mul_ne_zero _ hE,
exact pow_ne_zero 12 hd,
convert h12,
unfold disc,
ring,
end }
def to_scale (E : elliptic_curve k) (d : k) (hd : d ≠ 0) : points E → points (scale E d hd)
| 0 := 0
| (some P) :=
let ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ := P in
some ⟨⟨d*d*x, d*d*d*y⟩, begin
change y^2 + E.a1*x*y + E.a3*y = x^3 + E.a2*x^2 + E.a4*x + E.a6 at h,
replace h := congr_arg (λ t, d^6*t) h,
dsimp at h,
change _ = _,
unfold scale,
dsimp,
convert h,
ring_exp,
ring_exp,
end⟩
@[simp] lemma helper (a b : k) (h : b ≠ 0) : (a * b⁻¹) * b = a :=
begin
rw mul_assoc,
rw inv_mul_cancel h,
rw mul_one,
end
def of_scale (E : elliptic_curve k) (d : k) (hd : d ≠ 0) : points (scale E d hd) → points E
| 0 := 0
| (some P) :=
let ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ := P in
let F := (scale E d hd) in
some ⟨⟨d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * x, d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * y⟩, begin
change y^2 + F.a1*x*y + F.a3*y = x^3 + F.a2*x^2 + F.a4*x + F.a6 at h,
replace h := congr_arg (λ t, d⁻¹^6*t) h,
dsimp at h,
change _ = _,
simp only [F, scale] at h,
have hdd : d * d⁻¹ = 1,
exact mul_inv_cancel hd,
convert h,
{ ring_exp,
rw (show d⁻¹ ^ 6 = d⁻¹ * (d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * d⁻¹^3), by ring),
repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
rw hdd,
rw (show d ^ 3 * d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ = d * ( d * ( d * d⁻¹) * d⁻¹) * d⁻¹, by ring),
rw [hdd, mul_one, hdd, mul_one, hdd],
ring },
{ repeat {rw pow_succ},
repeat {rw pow_zero},
repeat {rw mul_one},
-- rw (show d⁻¹ ^ 6 = (d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * d⁻¹ * d⁻¹), by ring),
repeat {rw mul_add},
repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
repeat {rw helper _ d hd},
rw inv_mul_cancel hd,
ring_exp}
end⟩.
def scale_points (E : elliptic_curve k) (d : k) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
points E ≃ points (scale E d hd) :=
{ to_fun := to_scale E d hd,
inv_fun := of_scale E d hd,
left_inv := begin
intro P,
cases P,
refl,
rcases P with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩,
simp only [to_scale, of_scale],
congr',
{ repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp [hd] },
{ repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp [hd] },
end,
right_inv := begin
intro P,
cases P,
refl,
rcases P with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩,
simp only [to_scale, of_scale],
congr',
{ repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp [hd] },
{ repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp [hd] },
end }
def neg : points E → points E
| 0 := 0
| (some P) :=
let ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hP⟩ := P in
some ⟨(x, -E.a1*x-E.a3-y), begin
-- need to prove point is on the curve
change y^2 + E.a1*x*y + E.a3*y = x^3 + E.a2*x^2 + E.a4*x + E.a6 at hP,
change (-E.a1*x-E.a3-y)^2 + E.a1*x*(-E.a1*x-E.a3-y)+E.a3*(-E.a1*x-E.a3-y)
= x^3 + E.a2*x^2 + E.a4*x + E.a6,
-- our hypothesis is y^2+...=x^3+...
-- want : (a₁x-a₃-y)^2+...=x^3+...
-- I claim that our hypothesis equals what we want
convert hP using 1,
-- RHS's are equal, so it suffices to prove LHS's are equal
ring,
end⟩
theorem neg_to_scale (d : k) (hd : d ≠ 0) (P : points E) :
(scale E d hd).neg (to_scale E d hd P) = to_scale E d hd (E.neg P) :=
begin
cases P,
refl,
rcases P with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩,
simp [scale, to_scale, neg],
congr',
ring,
end
lemma pow_three {R : Type} [comm_ring R] (x : R) :
x^3=x*x*x := by ring
theorem neg_of_scale (d : k) (hd : d ≠ 0) (P : points (scale E d hd)) :
E.neg (of_scale E d hd P) = of_scale E d hd ((scale E d hd).neg P) :=
begin
cases P,
refl,
rcases P with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩,
simp [scale, of_scale, neg],
congr',
rw pow_three,
repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp [hd],
repeat {rw mul_sub},
repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp [hd],
repeat {rw ←mul_assoc},
simp [hd],
ring,
end
theorem neg_neg : function.involutive (neg E) :=
begin
rintros (_|⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩),
{ refl },
{ simp only [elliptic_curve.neg],
congr,
ring }
end
def double : points E → points E
| 0 := 0
| (some P) :=
let ⟨⟨x, y⟩, h⟩ := P in
if h2 : 2*y+E.a1*x+E.a3 = 0 then 0 else
let d := 2*y+E.a1*x+E.a3 in
let sd := (3*x^2+2*E.a2*x+E.a4-E.a1*y) in
let td := y*d-sd*x in
let x₂dd := sd^2+E.a1*sd*d-E.a2*d*d-2*x*d*d in
let y₂ddd := sd*x₂dd+td*d*d in
let y₂ddd' := y*d*d*d-sd*(x*d*d-x₂dd) in
let P2d : points (scale E d h2) := some ⟨⟨x₂dd, y₂ddd⟩, begin
unfold points._match_1 at h ⊢,
simp [y₂ddd, x₂dd, td, sd, scale, d] at h ⊢,
rw ←sub_eq_zero at h ⊢,
-- thank you sagemath!
have key : (y ^ 2 + E.a1 * x * y + E.a3 * y - (x ^ 3 + E.a2 * x ^ 2 + E.a4 * x + E.a6)) *
(64*y^6 + (192*E.a1*x + 192*E.a3)*y^5 + (240*E.a1^2*x^2 + 480*E.a1*E.a3*x + 240*E.a3^2)*y^4 +
(160*E.a1^3*x^3 + 480*E.a1^2*E.a3*x^2 + 480*E.a1*E.a3^2*x + 160*E.a3^3)*y^3 +
(60*E.a1^4*x^4 + 240*E.a1^3*E.a3*x^3 + 360*E.a1^2*E.a3^2*x^2 + 240*E.a1*E.a3^3*x +
60*E.a3^4)*y^2 + (12*E.a1^5*x^5 + 60*E.a1^4*E.a3*x^4 + 120*E.a1^3*E.a3^2*x^3 +
120*E.a1^2*E.a3^3*x^2 + 60*E.a1*E.a3^4*x + 12*E.a3^5)*y + E.a1^6*x^6 +
6*E.a1^5*E.a3*x^5 + 15*E.a1^4*E.a3^2*x^4 + 20*E.a1^3*E.a3^3*x^3 +
15*E.a1^2*E.a3^4*x^2 + 6*E.a1*E.a3^5*x + E.a3^6) = 0,
{ simp [h] },
convert key,
ring,
end⟩ in
E.neg (of_scale E d h2 P2d).
def add : points E → points E → points E
| 0 P := P
| P 0 := P
| (some P) (some Q) :=
let ⟨⟨x1, y1⟩, h1⟩ := P in
let ⟨⟨x2, y2⟩, h2⟩ := Q in
if hd : x1 = x2 then (if y1 = y2 then double E (some P) else 0) else
let d := (x1 - x2) in
let sd := (y1 - y2) in
let td := y1*d-sd*x1 in
let x3dd := sd^2+E.a1*sd*d-E.a2*d*d-(x1+x2)*d*d in
let y3ddd := sd*x3dd+td*d*d in
let q1 := ((-2*x1^3 + 6*x1^2*x2 - 6*x1*x2^2 + 2*x2^3)*y1 - E.a1*x1^4 +
3*E.a1*x1^3*x2 - 3*E.a1*x1^2*x2^2 + E.a1*x1*x2^3 - E.a3*x1^3 +
3*E.a3*x1^2*x2 - 3*E.a3*x1*x2^2 + E.a3*x2^3)*y2 + (x1^3 - 3*x1^2*x2 +
3*x1*x2^2 - x2^3)*y1^2 + (E.a1*x1^4 - 4*E.a1*x1^3*x2 +
6*E.a1*x1^2*x2^2 - 4*E.a1*x1*x2^3 + E.a1*x2^4)*y1 - E.a2*x1^5 - x1^6 +
5*E.a2*x1^4*x2 + 3*x1^5*x2 - 9*E.a2*x1^3*x2^2 + 7*E.a2*x1^2*x2^3 -
9*x1^3*x2^3 - 2*E.a2*x1*x2^4 + 12*x1^2*x2^4 - 6*x1*x2^5 + x2^6 +
E.a4*x1^3*x2 - 3*E.a4*x1^2*x2^2 + 3*E.a4*x1*x2^3 - E.a4*x2^4 +
E.a6*x1^3 - 3*E.a6*x1^2*x2 + 3*E.a6*x1*x2^2 - E.a6*x2^3 in
let q2 := (-x1^3 + 3*x1^2*x2 - 3*x1*x2^2 + x2^3)*y2^2 + ((2*x1^3 -
6*x1^2*x2 + 6*x1*x2^2 - 2*x2^3)*y1 + E.a1*x1^4 - 4*E.a1*x1^3*x2 +
6*E.a1*x1^2*x2^2 - 4*E.a1*x1*x2^3 + E.a1*x2^4)*y2 + (E.a1*x1^3*x2 -
3*E.a1*x1^2*x2^2 + 3*E.a1*x1*x2^3 - E.a1*x2^4 + E.a3*x1^3 -
3*E.a3*x1^2*x2 + 3*E.a3*x1*x2^2 - E.a3*x2^3)*y1 + x1^6 -
2*E.a2*x1^4*x2 - 6*x1^5*x2 + 7*E.a2*x1^3*x2^2 + 12*x1^4*x2^2 -
9*E.a2*x1^2*x2^3 - 9*x1^3*x2^3 + 5*E.a2*x1*x2^4 - E.a2*x2^5 +
3*x1*x2^5 - x2^6 - E.a4*x1^4 + 3*E.a4*x1^3*x2 - 3*E.a4*x1^2*x2^2 +
E.a4*x1*x2^3 - E.a6*x1^3 + 3*E.a6*x1^2*x2 - 3*E.a6*x1*x2^2 + E.a6*x2^3 in
let P3 : points (scale E d (sub_ne_zero.2 hd)) :=
some ⟨⟨x3dd, y3ddd⟩, begin
unfold points._match_1 at h1 h2 ⊢,
simp [y3ddd, x3dd, td, sd, scale, d] at ⊢,
rw ←sub_eq_zero at h1 h2 ⊢,
have : q1 * (y1 ^ 2 + E.a1 * x1 * y1 + E.a3 * y1 - (x1 ^ 3 + E.a2 * x1 ^ 2 + E.a4 * x1 + E.a6))
+ q2 * (y2 ^ 2 + E.a1 * x2 * y2 + E.a3 * y2 - (x2 ^ 3 + E.a2 * x2 ^ 2 + E.a4 * x2 + E.a6)) = 0,
{ rw h1,
rw h2,
simp
},
convert this,
simp only [q1, q2],
ring,
end⟩ in
E.neg (of_scale E d (sub_ne_zero.2 hd) P3).
end elliptic_curve
|
2352283a2d720b0b397aac8097b0c53b6071db36 | fddcf4b659baa121761c71be606b3f74b86fa695 | /quantifiers.lean | 4d2d2fc7f0ca9737475fb781b883235fc9f25db9 | [] | no_license | swarnpriya/Lean | 4218df9392f396cd7e5e745de35a917536ebd2bb | a0a9978fd058041eb1a09aec0e2dd7d19a7436a7 | refs/heads/master | 1,595,831,634,399 | 1,568,673,127,000 | 1,568,673,127,000 | 208,903,604 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,300 | lean | variables (α : Type) (p q : α -> Prop)
example : (∀ x : α , p x ∧ q x) -> (∀ y : α, p y) :=
assume h : (∀ x : α, p x ∧ q x),
assume z : α,
show p z, from and.elim_left(h z)
variables (x y z : α) (r : α -> α -> Prop)
variable trans_r : ∀ x y z, r x y -> r y z -> r x z
variables a b c : α
variables (hab : r a b) (hbc : r b c)
#check trans_r
#check trans_r a b c
#check trans_r a b c hab
#check trans_r a b c hab hbc
variables (α' : Type) (r' : α' -> α' -> Prop)
variable refl_r' : ∀ x, r' x x
variable symm_r' : ∀ {x y}, r' x y -> r' y x
variable trans_r' : ∀ {x y z}, r' x y -> r' y z -> r' x z
example (a b c d : α') (hab' : r' a b) (hcb' : r' c b) (hcd : r' c d): r' a d :=
trans_r' (trans_r' hab' (symm_r' hcb')) hcd
#check eq.refl
#check eq.trans
#check eq.symm
open eq
variables (α'' : Type) (a'' b'' c'' d'' : α'')
example (hab'' : a'' = b'') (hcb'' : c'' = b'') (hcd'' : c'' = d'') :
a'' = d'' :=
trans (trans hab'' (symm hcb'')) hcd''
example : 2 + 3 = 5 :=
rfl
variable α1 : Type
variables a1 a2 : α1
variables f g : α1 -> ℕ
variable h1 : a1 = a2
variable h2 : f = g
example : f a1 = f a2 := congr_arg f h1
example : f a1 = g a1 := congr_fun h2 a1
example : f a1 = g a2 := congr h2 h1
variables w1 x1 y1 z1 : ℤ
example : w1 + 0 = w1 := add_zero w1
example : 0 + w1 = w1 := zero_add w1
example : w1 * 1 = w1 := mul_one w1
example : 1 * w1 = w1 := one_mul w1
example : -w1 + w1 = 0 := neg_add_self w1
example : w1 + -w1 = 0 := add_neg_self w1
example : w1 - w1 = 0 := sub_self w1
example : w1 + x1 = x1 + w1 := add_comm w1 x1
example : w1 + x1 + y1 = w1 + (x1 + y1) := add_assoc w1 x1 y1
example : w1 * x1 = x1 * w1 := mul_comm w1 x1
example : w1 * (x1 + y1) = w1 * x1 + w1 * y1 := mul_add w1 x1 y1
example : w1 * (x1 + y1) = w1 * x1 + w1 * y1 := left_distrib w1 x1 y1
example : (x1 + y1) * w1 = x1 * w1 + y1 * w1 := add_mul x1 y1 w1
example : (x1 + y1) * w1 = x1 * w1 + y1 * w1 := right_distrib x1 y1 w1
example : w1 * (x1 - y1) = w1 * x1 - w1 * y1 := mul_sub w1 x1 y1
variables x' y' z' : ℤ
example (x' y' z' : ℕ) : x' * (y' + z') = x' * y' + x' * z':= mul_add x' y' z'
example (x' y' z' : ℕ) : (x' + y') * z' = x' * z' + y' * z' := add_mul x' y' z'
example (x' y' z' : ℕ) : x' + y' + z' = x' + (y' + z') := add_assoc x' y' z'
example (x' y' : ℕ) :
(x' + y') * (x' + y') = x' * x' + y' * x' + x' * y' + y' * y' :=
have h1 : (x' + y') * (x' + y') = (x' + y') * x' + (x' + y') * y',
from mul_add (x' + y') x' y',
have h2 : (x' + y') * (x' + y') = x' * x' + y' * x' + (x' * y' + y' * y'),
from (add_mul x' y' x') ▸ (add_mul x' y' y') ▸ h1,
h2.trans (add_assoc (x' * x'+ y' * x') (x' * y') (y' * y')).symm
namespace hide
variables (a' b' c' d' e' : ℕ)
variable h : a' = b'
variable hb : b' = c' + 1
variable hd : c' = d'
variable he : e' = 1 + d'
include h hb hd he
theorem T : a' = e' :=
calc
a' = b' : by rw h
... = c' + 1 : by rw hb
... = d' + 1 : by rw hd
... = 1 + d' : by rw add_comm
... = e' : by rw he
--theorem T : a' = e' :=
--calc
--a' = b' : h
--... = c' + 1 : hb
--... = d' + 1 : congr_arg _ hd
--... = 1 + d' : add_comm d' (1 : ℕ)
--... = e' : symm he
--theorem T' (a'' b'' c'' d'' : ℕ)
--(h1' : a'' = b'') (h2' : b'' ≤ c'') (h3' : c'' + 1 < d'') : a'' < d'' :=
--calc
-- a'' = b'' : h1'
--... ≤ b'' + 1 : nat.lt_succ_self b''
-- ... ≤ c'' + 1 : nat.succ_le_succ h2'
-- ... < d'' : h3'
example (s p : ℕ) :
(s + p) * (s + p) = s * s + p * s + s * p + p * p :=
by simp [mul_add, add_mul]
--calc
--(s + p) * (s + p) = (s + p) * s + (s + p) * p : by rw mul_add
--... = s * s + p * s + (s + p) * p : by rw add_mul
--... = s * s + p * s + (s * p + p * p) : by rw add_mul
-- ... = s * s + p * s + s * p + p * p : by rw ←add_assoc
-- Existential Quantifier
open nat
example : ∃ x : ℕ , x > 0 :=
have h1 : 1 > 0 , from zero_lt_succ 0,
exists.intro 1 h1
example (x : ℕ) (h : x > 0) : ∃ y, y < x :=
exists.intro 0 h
example (x y z : ℕ) (hxy : x < y) (hyz : y < z) :
∃ w, x < w ∧ w < z :=
exists.intro y (and.intro hxy hyz)
def is_even (a : nat) := ∃ b, a = 2*b
open classical
variables (α11 : Type) (p1 q1 : α11 -> Prop)
variable β : α11
variable r11 : Prop
example : (∃ x : α11, r11) -> r11 :=
begin
exists.intro,
|
322ad2baa65b1c635563c877522123bef5b13177 | 2fbe653e4bc441efde5e5d250566e65538709888 | /src/order/filter/bases.lean | b86440e87c2c9d75fd39b008cecf0acdba062e27 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | aceg00/mathlib | 5e15e79a8af87ff7eb8c17e2629c442ef24e746b | 8786ea6d6d46d6969ac9a869eb818bf100802882 | refs/heads/master | 1,649,202,698,930 | 1,580,924,783,000 | 1,580,924,783,000 | 149,197,272 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,537,224,208,000 | 1,537,224,207,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,654 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import order.filter.basic
/-! # Filter bases
In this file we define `filter.has_basis l p s`, where `l` is a filter on `α`, `p` is a predicate
on some index set `ι`, and `s : ι → set α`.
## Main statements
* `has_basis.mem_iff`, `has_basis.mem_of_superset`, `has_basis.mem_of_mem` : restate `t ∈ f` in terms
of a basis;
* `basis_sets` : all sets of a filter form a basis;
* `has_basis.inf`, `has_basis.inf_principal`, `has_basis.prod`, `has_basis.prod_self`,
`has_basis.map`, `has_basis.comap` : combinators to construct filters of `l ⊓ l'`,
`l ⊓ principal t`, `l.prod l'`, `l.prod l`, `l.map f`, `l.comap f` respectively;
* `has_basis.le_iff`, `has_basis.ge_iff`, has_basis.le_basis_iff` : restate `l ≤ l'` in terms
of bases.
* `has_basis.tendsto_right_iff`, `has_basis.tendsto_left_iff`, `has_basis.tendsto_iff` : restate
`tendsto f l l'` in terms of bases.
## Implementation notes
As with `Union`/`bUnion`/`sUnion`, there are three different approaches to filter bases:
* `has_basis l s`, `s : set (set α)`;
* `has_basis l s`, `s : ι → set α`;
* `has_basis l p s`, `p : ι → Prop`, `s : ι → set α`.
We use the latter one because, e.g., `𝓝 x` in an `emetric_space` or in a `metric_space` has a basis
of this form. The other two can be emulated using `s = id` or `p = λ _, true`.
With this approach sometimes one needs to `simp` the statement provided by the `has_basis`
machinery, e.g., `simp only [exists_prop, true_and]` or `simp only [forall_const]` can help
with the case `p = λ _, true`.
-/
namespace filter
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*}
open set lattice
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a basis `s : ι → set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`. -/
protected def has_basis (l : filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) : Prop :=
∀ t : set α, t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t
section same_type
variables {l l' : filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} {i : ι}
{p' : ι' → Prop} {s' : ι' → set α} {i' : ι'}
/-- Definition of `has_basis` unfolded to make it useful for `rw` and `simp`. -/
lemma has_basis.mem_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) : t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
hl t
lemma has_basis.mem_of_superset (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hi : p i) (ht : s i ⊆ t) : t ∈ l :=
(hl t).2 ⟨i, hi, ht⟩
lemma has_basis.mem_of_mem (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hi : p i) : s i ∈ l :=
hl.mem_of_superset hi $ subset.refl _
lemma has_basis.forall_nonempty_iff_ne_bot (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(∀ {i}, p i → (s i).nonempty) ↔ l ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨λ H, forall_sets_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.1 $
λ s hs, let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := (hl s).1 hs in (H hi).mono his,
λ H i hi, nonempty_of_mem_sets H (hl.mem_of_mem hi)⟩
lemma basis_sets (l : filter α) : l.has_basis (λ s : set α, s ∈ l) id :=
λ t, exists_sets_subset_iff.symm
lemma at_top_basis [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] :
(@at_top α _).has_basis (λ _, true) Ici :=
λ t, by simpa only [exists_prop, true_and] using @mem_at_top_sets α _ _ t
lemma at_top_basis' [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
(@at_top α _).has_basis (λ x, a ≤ x) Ici :=
λ t, (@at_top_basis α ⟨a⟩ _ t).trans
⟨λ ⟨x, _, hx⟩, ⟨x ⊔ a, le_sup_right, λ y hy, hx (le_trans le_sup_left hy)⟩,
λ ⟨x, _, hx⟩, ⟨x, trivial, hx⟩⟩
theorem has_basis.ge_iff (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → s' i' ∈ l :=
⟨λ h i' hi', h $ hl'.mem_of_mem hi',
λ h s hs, let ⟨i', hi', hs⟩ := (hl' s).1 hs in mem_sets_of_superset (h _ hi') hs⟩
theorem has_basis.le_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ t ∈ l', ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
by simp only [le_def, hl.mem_iff]
theorem has_basis.le_basis_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ s' i' :=
by simp only [hl'.ge_iff, hl.mem_iff]
lemma has_basis.inf (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊓ l').has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∩ s' i.2) :=
begin
intro t,
simp only [mem_inf_sets, exists_prop, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff],
split,
{ rintros ⟨t, ⟨i, hi, ht⟩, t', ⟨i', hi', ht'⟩, H⟩,
use [(i, i'), ⟨hi, hi'⟩, subset.trans (inter_subset_inter ht ht') H] },
{ rintros ⟨⟨i, i'⟩, ⟨hi, hi'⟩, H⟩,
use [s i, i, hi, subset.refl _, s' i', i', hi', subset.refl _, H] }
end
lemma has_basis.inf_principal (hl : l.has_basis p s) (s' : set α) :
(l ⊓ principal s').has_basis p (λ i, s i ∩ s') :=
λ t, by simp only [mem_inf_principal, hl.mem_iff, subset_def, mem_set_of_eq,
mem_inter_iff, and_imp]
lemma has_basis.eq_binfi (h : l.has_basis p s) :
l = ⨅ i (_ : p i), principal (s i) :=
eq_binfi_of_mem_sets_iff_exists_mem $ λ t, by simp only [h.mem_iff, mem_principal_sets]
lemma has_basis.eq_infi (h : l.has_basis (λ _, true) s) :
l = ⨅ i, principal (s i) :=
by simpa only [infi_true] using h.eq_binfi
@[nolint] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma has_basis_infi_principal {s : ι → set α} (h : directed (≥) s) (ne : nonempty ι) :
(⨅ i, principal (s i)).has_basis (λ _, true) s :=
begin
refine λ t, (mem_infi (h.mono_comp _ _) ne t).trans $
by simp only [exists_prop, true_and, mem_principal_sets],
exact λ _ _, principal_mono.2
end
@[nolint] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma has_basis_binfi_principal {s : β → set α} {S : set β} (h : directed_on (s ⁻¹'o (≥)) S)
(ne : S.nonempty) :
(⨅ i ∈ S, principal (s i)).has_basis (λ i, i ∈ S) s :=
begin
refine λ t, (mem_binfi _ ne).trans $ by simp only [mem_principal_sets],
rw [directed_on_iff_directed, ← directed_comp, (∘)] at h ⊢,
apply h.mono_comp _ _,
exact λ _ _, principal_mono.2
end
lemma has_basis.map (f : α → β) (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.map f).has_basis p (λ i, f '' (s i)) :=
λ t, by simp only [mem_map, image_subset_iff, hl.mem_iff, preimage]
lemma has_basis.comap (f : β → α) (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.comap f).has_basis p (λ i, f ⁻¹' (s i)) :=
begin
intro t,
simp only [mem_comap_sets, exists_prop, hl.mem_iff],
split,
{ rintros ⟨t', ⟨i, hi, ht'⟩, H⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, subset.trans (preimage_mono ht') H⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact ⟨s i, ⟨i, hi, subset.refl _⟩, H⟩ }
end
lemma has_basis.prod_self (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.prod l).has_basis p (λ i, (s i).prod (s i)) :=
begin
intro t,
apply mem_prod_iff.trans,
split,
{ rintros ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, H⟩,
rcases hl.mem_iff.1 (inter_mem_sets ht₁ ht₂) with ⟨i, hi, ht⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, λ p ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩, H ⟨(ht hp₁).1, (ht hp₂).2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact ⟨s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, H⟩ }
end
end same_type
section two_types
variables {la : filter α} {pa : ι → Prop} {sa : ι → set α}
{lb : filter β} {pb : ι' → Prop} {sb : ι' → set β} {f : α → β}
lemma has_basis.tendsto_left_iff (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ t ∈ lb, ∃ i (hi : pa i), ∀ x ∈ sa i, f x ∈ t :=
by { simp only [tendsto, (hla.map f).le_iff, image_subset_iff], refl }
lemma has_basis.tendsto_right_iff (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ i (hi : pb i), {x | f x ∈ sb i} ∈ la :=
by simp only [tendsto, hlb.ge_iff, mem_map, preimage]
lemma has_basis.tendsto_iff (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ ib (hib : pb ib), ∃ ia (hia : pa ia), ∀ x ∈ sa ia, f x ∈ sb ib :=
by simp only [hlb.tendsto_right_iff, hla.mem_iff, subset_def, mem_set_of_eq]
lemma tendsto.basis_left (H : tendsto f la lb) (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) :
∀ t ∈ lb, ∃ i (hi : pa i), ∀ x ∈ sa i, f x ∈ t :=
hla.tendsto_left_iff.1 H
lemma tendsto.basis_right (H : tendsto f la lb) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
∀ i (hi : pb i), {x | f x ∈ sb i} ∈ la :=
hlb.tendsto_right_iff.1 H
lemma tendsto.basis_both (H : tendsto f la lb) (hla : la.has_basis pa sa)
(hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
∀ ib (hib : pb ib), ∃ ia (hia : pa ia), ∀ x ∈ sa ia, f x ∈ sb ib :=
(hla.tendsto_iff hlb).1 H
lemma has_basis.prod (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
(la.prod lb).has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2) (λ i, (sa i.1).prod (sb i.2)) :=
(hla.comap prod.fst).inf (hlb.comap prod.snd)
end two_types
end filter
|
9005eca3237b71c451c2811a51a012a8534babad | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/data/nat/gcd/basic.lean | 1755c5bc553132035d0070ab2c00af48c140ef53 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,414 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import algebra.group_power.basic
import algebra.group_with_zero.divisibility
import data.nat.order.lemmas
/-!
# Definitions and properties of `nat.gcd`, `nat.lcm`, and `nat.coprime`
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `gcd_monoid.gcd` and
`gcd_monoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `is_coprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `nat.coprime`, see
`nat.is_coprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
-/
namespace nat
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_dvd (m n : ℕ) : (gcd m n ∣ m) ∧ (gcd m n ∣ n) :=
gcd.induction m n
(λn, by rw gcd_zero_left; exact ⟨dvd_zero n, dvd_refl n⟩)
(λm n npos, by rw ←gcd_rec; exact λ ⟨IH₁, IH₂⟩, ⟨IH₂, (dvd_mod_iff IH₂).1 IH₁⟩)
theorem gcd_dvd_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ m := (gcd_dvd m n).left
theorem gcd_dvd_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ n := (gcd_dvd m n).right
theorem gcd_le_left {m} (n) (h : 0 < m) : gcd m n ≤ m := le_of_dvd h $ gcd_dvd_left m n
theorem gcd_le_right (m) {n} (h : 0 < n) : gcd m n ≤ n := le_of_dvd h $ gcd_dvd_right m n
theorem dvd_gcd {m n k : ℕ} : k ∣ m → k ∣ n → k ∣ gcd m n :=
gcd.induction m n (λn _ kn, by rw gcd_zero_left; exact kn)
(λn m mpos IH H1 H2, by rw gcd_rec; exact IH ((dvd_mod_iff H1).2 H2) H1)
theorem dvd_gcd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : k ∣ gcd m n ↔ k ∣ m ∧ k ∣ n :=
iff.intro (λ h, ⟨h.trans (gcd_dvd m n).left, h.trans (gcd_dvd m n).right⟩)
(λ h, dvd_gcd h.left h.right)
theorem gcd_comm (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n = gcd n m :=
dvd_antisymm
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right m n) (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right n m) (gcd_dvd_left n m))
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ} : m ∣ n ↔ gcd m n = m :=
⟨λ h, by rw [gcd_rec, mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, gcd_zero_left],
λ h, h ▸ gcd_dvd_right m n⟩
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ} : m ∣ n ↔ gcd n m = m :=
by rw gcd_comm; apply gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
theorem gcd_assoc (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd_antisymm
(dvd_gcd
((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n))
(gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
@[simp] theorem gcd_one_right (n : ℕ) : gcd n 1 = 1 :=
eq.trans (gcd_comm n 1) $ gcd_one_left n
theorem gcd_mul_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m * n) (m * k) = m * gcd n k :=
gcd.induction n k
(λk, by repeat {rw mul_zero <|> rw gcd_zero_left})
(λk n H IH, by rwa [←mul_mod_mul_left, ←gcd_rec, ←gcd_rec] at IH)
theorem gcd_mul_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m * n) (k * n) = gcd m k * n :=
by rw [mul_comm m n, mul_comm k n, mul_comm (gcd m k) n, gcd_mul_left]
theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_left {m : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (mpos : 0 < m) : 0 < gcd m n :=
pos_of_dvd_of_pos (gcd_dvd_left m n) mpos
theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_right (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (npos : 0 < n) : 0 < gcd m n :=
pos_of_dvd_of_pos (gcd_dvd_right m n) npos
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left {m n : ℕ} (H : gcd m n = 0) : m = 0 :=
or.elim (nat.eq_zero_or_pos m) id
(assume H1 : 0 < m, absurd (eq.symm H) (ne_of_lt (gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ H1)))
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right {m n : ℕ} (H : gcd m n = 0) : n = 0 :=
by rw gcd_comm at H; exact eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H
@[simp] theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : ℕ} : gcd i j = 0 ↔ i = 0 ∧ j = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
exact ⟨eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h, eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h⟩, },
{ rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
exact nat.gcd_zero_right 0 }
end
theorem gcd_div {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : k ∣ m) (H2 : k ∣ n) :
gcd (m / k) (n / k) = gcd m n / k :=
(decidable.eq_or_ne k 0).elim
(λk0, by rw [k0, nat.div_zero, nat.div_zero, nat.div_zero, gcd_zero_right])
(λH3, mul_right_cancel₀ H3 $ by rw [
nat.div_mul_cancel (dvd_gcd H1 H2), ←gcd_mul_right,
nat.div_mul_cancel H1, nat.div_mul_cancel H2])
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b)
(hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) : d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {m k : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H : m ∣ k) : gcd m n ∣ gcd k n :=
dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left m n).trans H) (gcd_dvd_right m n)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {m k : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H : m ∣ k) : gcd n m ∣ gcd n k :=
dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left n m) ((gcd_dvd_right n m).trans H)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_eq_left {m n : ℕ} (H : m ∣ n) : gcd m n = m :=
dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd dvd_rfl H)
theorem gcd_eq_right {m n : ℕ} (H : n ∣ m) : gcd m n = n :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
-- Lemmas where one argument is a multiple of the other
@[simp] lemma gcd_mul_left_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m * n) n = n :=
dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left _ _) dvd_rfl)
@[simp] lemma gcd_mul_left_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd n (m * n) = n :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_left_left]
@[simp] lemma gcd_mul_right_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (n * m) n = n :=
by rw [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left_left]
@[simp] lemma gcd_mul_right_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd n (n * m) = n :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_right_left]
-- Lemmas for repeated application of `gcd`
@[simp] lemma gcd_gcd_self_right_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (gcd m n) = gcd m n :=
dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left _ _) dvd_rfl)
@[simp] lemma gcd_gcd_self_right_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (gcd n m) = gcd n m :=
by rw [gcd_comm n m, gcd_gcd_self_right_left]
@[simp] lemma gcd_gcd_self_left_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd (gcd n m) m = gcd n m :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_gcd_self_right_right]
@[simp] lemma gcd_gcd_self_left_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (gcd m n) m = gcd m n :=
by rw [gcd_comm m n, gcd_gcd_self_left_right]
-- Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other
@[simp] lemma gcd_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + k * m) = gcd m n :=
by simp [gcd_rec m (n + k * m), gcd_rec m n]
@[simp] lemma gcd_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m * k) = gcd m n :=
by simp [gcd_rec m (n + m * k), gcd_rec m n]
@[simp] lemma gcd_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (k * m + n) = gcd m n :=
by simp [add_comm _ n]
@[simp] lemma gcd_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (m * k + n) = gcd m n :=
by simp [add_comm _ n]
@[simp] lemma gcd_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m + k * n) n = gcd m n :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_mul_right_right, gcd_comm]
@[simp] lemma gcd_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m + n * k) n = gcd m n :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_mul_left_right, gcd_comm]
@[simp] lemma gcd_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (k * n + m) n = gcd m n :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_right_add_right, gcd_comm]
@[simp] lemma gcd_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (n * k + m) n = gcd m n :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_left_add_right, gcd_comm]
-- Lemmas where one argument consists of an addition of the other
@[simp] lemma gcd_add_self_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m) = gcd m n :=
eq.trans (by rw one_mul) (gcd_add_mul_right_right m n 1)
@[simp] lemma gcd_add_self_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m + n) n = gcd m n :=
by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_self_right, gcd_comm]
@[simp] lemma gcd_self_add_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m + n) m = gcd n m :=
by rw [add_comm, gcd_add_self_left]
@[simp] lemma gcd_self_add_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (m + n) = gcd m n :=
by rw [add_comm, gcd_add_self_right]
/-! ### `lcm` -/
theorem lcm_comm (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n = lcm n m :=
by delta lcm; rw [mul_comm, gcd_comm]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_left (m : ℕ) : lcm 0 m = 0 :=
by delta lcm; rw [zero_mul, nat.zero_div]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_right (m : ℕ) : lcm m 0 = 0 := lcm_comm 0 m ▸ lcm_zero_left m
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_left (m : ℕ) : lcm 1 m = m :=
by delta lcm; rw [one_mul, gcd_one_left, nat.div_one]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_right (m : ℕ) : lcm m 1 = m := lcm_comm 1 m ▸ lcm_one_left m
@[simp]
theorem lcm_self (m : ℕ) : lcm m m = m :=
or.elim (nat.eq_zero_or_pos m)
(λh, by rw [h, lcm_zero_left])
(λh, by delta lcm; rw [gcd_self, nat.mul_div_cancel _ h])
theorem dvd_lcm_left (m n : ℕ) : m ∣ lcm m n :=
dvd.intro (n / gcd m n) (nat.mul_div_assoc _ $ gcd_dvd_right m n).symm
theorem dvd_lcm_right (m n : ℕ) : n ∣ lcm m n :=
lcm_comm n m ▸ dvd_lcm_left n m
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n * lcm m n = m * n :=
by delta lcm; rw [nat.mul_div_cancel' ((gcd_dvd_left m n).trans (dvd_mul_right m n))]
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : m ∣ k) (H2 : n ∣ k) : lcm m n ∣ k :=
or.elim (nat.eq_zero_or_pos k)
(λh, by rw h; exact dvd_zero _)
(λkpos, dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (gcd_pos_of_pos_left n (pos_of_dvd_of_pos H1 kpos)) $
by rw [gcd_mul_lcm, ←gcd_mul_right, mul_comm n k];
exact dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left _ H2) (mul_dvd_mul_right H1 _))
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
lemma lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨λ h, ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩,
and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
theorem lcm_assoc (m n k : ℕ) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
dvd_antisymm
(lcm_dvd
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left m (lcm n k)) ((dvd_lcm_left n k).trans (dvd_lcm_right m (lcm n k))))
((dvd_lcm_right n k).trans (dvd_lcm_right m (lcm n k))))
(lcm_dvd
((dvd_lcm_left m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (lcm m n) k))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (lcm m n) k))
(dvd_lcm_right (lcm m n) k)))
theorem lcm_ne_zero {m n : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) : lcm m n ≠ 0 :=
by { intro h, simpa [h, hm, hn] using gcd_mul_lcm m n, }
lemma lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n :=
by { simp_rw pos_iff_ne_zero, exact lcm_ne_zero }
/-!
### `coprime`
See also `nat.coprime_of_dvd` and `nat.coprime_of_dvd'` to prove `nat.coprime m n`.
-/
instance (m n : ℕ) : decidable (coprime m n) := by unfold coprime; apply_instance
theorem coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one {m n : ℕ} : coprime m n ↔ gcd m n = 1 := iff.rfl
theorem coprime.gcd_eq_one {m n : ℕ} (h : coprime m n) : gcd m n = 1 := h
theorem coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n :=
by rw [←one_mul (lcm m n), ←h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
theorem coprime.symm {m n : ℕ} : coprime n m → coprime m n := (gcd_comm m n).trans
theorem coprime_comm {m n : ℕ} : coprime n m ↔ coprime m n := ⟨coprime.symm, coprime.symm⟩
theorem coprime.symmetric : symmetric coprime := λ m n, coprime.symm
theorem coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : coprime k n) (H2 : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m :=
let t := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left k m) H2 in
by rwa [gcd_mul_left, H1.gcd_eq_one, mul_one] at t
theorem coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : coprime k m) (H2 : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ n :=
by rw mul_comm at H2; exact H1.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right H2
theorem coprime.dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H : coprime k n) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ m :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right, λ h, dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h n⟩
theorem coprime.dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H : coprime k m) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ n :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left, λ h, dvd_mul_of_dvd_right h m⟩
theorem coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel {k : ℕ} (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (H : coprime k n) :
gcd (k * m) n = gcd m n :=
have H1 : coprime (gcd (k * m) n) k,
by rw [coprime, gcd_assoc, H.symm.gcd_eq_one, gcd_one_right],
dvd_antisymm
(dvd_gcd (H1.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left (gcd_dvd_left _ _)) (gcd_dvd_right _ _))
(gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left _ _ _)
theorem coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel (m : ℕ) {k n : ℕ} (H : coprime k n) :
gcd (m * k) n = gcd m n :=
by rw [mul_comm m k, H.gcd_mul_left_cancel m]
theorem coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel_right {k m : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H : coprime k m) :
gcd m (k * n) = gcd m n :=
by rw [gcd_comm m n, gcd_comm m (k * n), H.gcd_mul_left_cancel n]
theorem coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel_right {k m : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H : coprime k m) :
gcd m (n * k) = gcd m n :=
by rw [mul_comm n k, H.gcd_mul_left_cancel_right n]
theorem coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd {m n : ℕ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
coprime (m / gcd m n) (n / gcd m n) :=
by rw [coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, gcd_div (gcd_dvd_left m n) (gcd_dvd_right m n), nat.div_self H]
theorem not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd {m n d : ℕ} (dgt1 : 1 < d) (Hm : d ∣ m) (Hn : d ∣ n) :
¬ coprime m n :=
λ co, not_lt_of_ge (le_of_dvd zero_lt_one $ by rw [←co.gcd_eq_one]; exact dvd_gcd Hm Hn) dgt1
theorem exists_coprime {m n : ℕ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ m' n', coprime m' n' ∧ m = m' * gcd m n ∧ n = n' * gcd m n :=
⟨_, _, coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd H,
(nat.div_mul_cancel (gcd_dvd_left m n)).symm,
(nat.div_mul_cancel (gcd_dvd_right m n)).symm⟩
theorem exists_coprime' {m n : ℕ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ g m' n', 0 < g ∧ coprime m' n' ∧ m = m' * g ∧ n = n' * g :=
let ⟨m', n', h⟩ := exists_coprime H in ⟨_, m', n', H, h⟩
@[simp] theorem coprime_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} : coprime m (n + m) ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_add_self_right]
@[simp] theorem coprime_self_add_right {m n : ℕ} : coprime m (m + n) ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [add_comm, coprime_add_self_right]
@[simp] theorem coprime_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} : coprime (m + n) n ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_add_self_left]
@[simp] theorem coprime_self_add_left {m n : ℕ} : coprime (m + n) m ↔ coprime n m :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_self_add_left]
@[simp] lemma coprime_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : coprime m (n + k * m) ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_right]
@[simp] lemma coprime_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : coprime m (n + m * k) ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_right]
@[simp] lemma coprime_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : coprime m (k * m + n) ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_right]
@[simp] lemma coprime_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : coprime m (m * k + n) ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_right]
@[simp] lemma coprime_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : coprime (m + k * n) n ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_left]
@[simp] lemma coprime_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : coprime (m + n * k) n ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_left]
@[simp] lemma coprime_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : coprime (k * n + m) n ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_left]
@[simp] lemma coprime_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : coprime (n * k + m) n ↔ coprime m n :=
by rw [coprime, coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_left]
theorem coprime.mul {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : coprime m k) (H2 : coprime n k) : coprime (m * n) k :=
(H1.gcd_mul_left_cancel n).trans H2
theorem coprime.mul_right {k m n : ℕ} (H1 : coprime k m) (H2 : coprime k n) : coprime k (m * n) :=
(H1.symm.mul H2.symm).symm
theorem coprime.coprime_dvd_left {m k n : ℕ} (H1 : m ∣ k) (H2 : coprime k n) : coprime m n :=
eq_one_of_dvd_one (by delta coprime at H2; rw ← H2; exact gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ H1)
theorem coprime.coprime_dvd_right {m k n : ℕ} (H1 : n ∣ m) (H2 : coprime k m) : coprime k n :=
(H2.symm.coprime_dvd_left H1).symm
theorem coprime.coprime_mul_left {k m n : ℕ} (H : coprime (k * m) n) : coprime m n :=
H.coprime_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem coprime.coprime_mul_right {k m n : ℕ} (H : coprime (m * k) n) : coprime m n :=
H.coprime_dvd_left (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem coprime.coprime_mul_left_right {k m n : ℕ} (H : coprime m (k * n)) : coprime m n :=
H.coprime_dvd_right (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem coprime.coprime_mul_right_right {k m n : ℕ} (H : coprime m (n * k)) : coprime m n :=
H.coprime_dvd_right (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem coprime.coprime_div_left {m n a : ℕ} (cmn : coprime m n) (dvd : a ∣ m) :
coprime (m / a) n :=
begin
by_cases a_split : (a = 0),
{ subst a_split,
rw zero_dvd_iff at dvd,
simpa [dvd] using cmn, },
{ rcases dvd with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
rw nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero a_split),
exact coprime.coprime_mul_left cmn, },
end
theorem coprime.coprime_div_right {m n a : ℕ} (cmn : coprime m n) (dvd : a ∣ n) :
coprime m (n / a) :=
(coprime.coprime_div_left cmn.symm dvd).symm
lemma coprime_mul_iff_left {k m n : ℕ} : coprime (m * n) k ↔ coprime m k ∧ coprime n k :=
⟨λ h, ⟨coprime.coprime_mul_right h, coprime.coprime_mul_left h⟩,
λ ⟨h, _⟩, by rwa [coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel n h]⟩
lemma coprime_mul_iff_right {k m n : ℕ} : coprime k (m * n) ↔ coprime k m ∧ coprime k n :=
by simpa only [coprime_comm] using coprime_mul_iff_left
lemma coprime.gcd_left (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : coprime m n) : coprime (gcd k m) n :=
hmn.coprime_dvd_left $ gcd_dvd_right k m
lemma coprime.gcd_right (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : coprime m n) : coprime m (gcd k n) :=
hmn.coprime_dvd_right $ gcd_dvd_right k n
lemma coprime.gcd_both (k l : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : coprime m n) : coprime (gcd k m) (gcd l n) :=
(hmn.gcd_left k).gcd_right l
lemma coprime.mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd {a n m : ℕ} (hmn : coprime m n)
(hm : m ∣ a) (hn : n ∣ a) : m * n ∣ a :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hm in hk.symm ▸ mul_dvd_mul_left _ (hmn.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left (hk ▸ hn))
theorem coprime_one_left : ∀ n, coprime 1 n := gcd_one_left
theorem coprime_one_right : ∀ n, coprime n 1 := gcd_one_right
theorem coprime.pow_left {m k : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H1 : coprime m k) : coprime (m ^ n) k :=
nat.rec_on n (coprime_one_left _) (λn IH, H1.mul IH)
theorem coprime.pow_right {m k : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H1 : coprime k m) : coprime k (m ^ n) :=
(H1.symm.pow_left n).symm
theorem coprime.pow {k l : ℕ} (m n : ℕ) (H1 : coprime k l) : coprime (k ^ m) (l ^ n) :=
(H1.pow_left _).pow_right _
@[simp] lemma coprime_pow_left_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a b : ℕ) :
nat.coprime (a ^ n) b ↔ nat.coprime a b :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne',
rw [pow_succ, nat.coprime_mul_iff_left],
exact ⟨and.left, λ hab, ⟨hab, hab.pow_left _⟩⟩
end
@[simp] lemma coprime_pow_right_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a b : ℕ) :
nat.coprime a (b ^ n) ↔ nat.coprime a b :=
by rw [nat.coprime_comm, coprime_pow_left_iff hn, nat.coprime_comm]
theorem coprime.eq_one_of_dvd {k m : ℕ} (H : coprime k m) (d : k ∣ m) : k = 1 :=
by rw [← H.gcd_eq_one, gcd_eq_left d]
@[simp] theorem coprime_zero_left (n : ℕ) : coprime 0 n ↔ n = 1 :=
by simp [coprime]
@[simp] theorem coprime_zero_right (n : ℕ) : coprime n 0 ↔ n = 1 :=
by simp [coprime]
theorem not_coprime_zero_zero : ¬ coprime 0 0 := by simp
@[simp] theorem coprime_one_left_iff (n : ℕ) : coprime 1 n ↔ true :=
by simp [coprime]
@[simp] theorem coprime_one_right_iff (n : ℕ) : coprime n 1 ↔ true :=
by simp [coprime]
@[simp] theorem coprime_self (n : ℕ) : coprime n n ↔ n = 1 :=
by simp [coprime]
lemma gcd_mul_of_coprime_of_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (hac : coprime a c) (b_dvd_c : b ∣ c) :
gcd (a * b) c = b :=
begin
rcases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd b_dvd_c with ⟨d, rfl⟩,
rw [gcd_mul_right],
convert one_mul b,
exact coprime.coprime_mul_right_right hac,
end
lemma coprime.eq_of_mul_eq_zero {m n : ℕ} (h : m.coprime n) (hmn : m * n = 0) :
m = 0 ∧ n = 1 ∨ m = 1 ∧ n = 0 :=
(nat.eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hmn).imp
(λ hm, ⟨hm, n.coprime_zero_left.mp $ hm ▸ h⟩)
(λ hn, ⟨m.coprime_zero_left.mp $ hn ▸ h.symm, hn⟩)
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`.
See `exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul` for the more general but less constructive version for other
`gcd_monoid`s. -/
def prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod {m n k : ℕ} (H : k ∣ m * n) :
{ d : {m' // m' ∣ m} × {n' // n' ∣ n} // k = d.1 * d.2 } :=
begin
cases h0 : (gcd k m),
case nat.zero
{ obtain rfl : k = 0 := eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0,
obtain rfl : m = 0 := eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0,
exact ⟨⟨⟨0, dvd_refl 0⟩, ⟨n, dvd_refl n⟩⟩, (zero_mul n).symm⟩ },
case nat.succ : tmp
{ have hpos : 0 < gcd k m := h0.symm ▸ nat.zero_lt_succ _; clear h0 tmp,
have hd : gcd k m * (k / gcd k m) = k := (nat.mul_div_cancel' (gcd_dvd_left k m)),
refine ⟨⟨⟨gcd k m, gcd_dvd_right k m⟩, ⟨k / gcd k m, _⟩⟩, hd.symm⟩,
apply dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left hpos,
rw [hd, ← gcd_mul_right],
exact dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) H }
end
lemma dvd_mul {x m n : ℕ} :
x ∣ (m * n) ↔ ∃ y z, y ∣ m ∧ z ∣ n ∧ y * z = x :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
obtain ⟨⟨⟨y, hy⟩, ⟨z, hz⟩⟩, rfl⟩ := prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod h,
exact ⟨y, z, hy, hz, rfl⟩, },
{ rintro ⟨y, z, hy, hz, rfl⟩,
exact mul_dvd_mul hy hz },
end
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd (k m n : ℕ) : gcd k (m * n) ∣ gcd k m * gcd k n :=
begin
rcases (prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod $ gcd_dvd_right k (m * n)) with ⟨⟨⟨m', hm'⟩, ⟨n', hn'⟩⟩, h⟩,
replace h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n' := h,
rw h,
have hm'n' : m' * n' ∣ k := h ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _,
apply mul_dvd_mul,
{ have hm'k : m' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_right m' n').trans hm'n',
exact dvd_gcd hm'k hm' },
{ have hn'k : n' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_left n' m').trans hm'n',
exact dvd_gcd hn'k hn' }
end
theorem coprime.gcd_mul (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : coprime m n) : gcd k (m * n) = gcd k m * gcd k n :=
dvd_antisymm
(gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd k m n)
((h.gcd_both k k).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd
(gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right _ _ _)
(gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right _ _ _))
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff {a b n : ℕ} (n0 : 0 < n) : a ^ n ∣ b ^ n ↔ a ∣ b :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd h _⟩,
cases nat.eq_zero_or_pos (gcd a b) with g0 g0,
{ simp [eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right g0] },
rcases exists_coprime' g0 with ⟨g, a', b', g0', co, rfl, rfl⟩,
rw [mul_pow, mul_pow] at h,
replace h := dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (pow_pos g0' _) h,
have := pow_dvd_pow a' n0,
rw [pow_one, (co.pow n n).eq_one_of_dvd h] at this,
simp [eq_one_of_dvd_one this]
end
lemma gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul {a b c d : ℕ} (cop : c.coprime d) (h : a * b = c * d) :
a.gcd c * b.gcd c = c :=
begin
apply dvd_antisymm,
{ apply nat.coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right (nat.coprime.mul (cop.gcd_left _) (cop.gcd_left _)),
rw ← h,
apply mul_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd _ _).1 (gcd_dvd _ _).1 },
{ rw [gcd_comm a _, gcd_comm b _],
transitivity c.gcd (a * b),
rw [h, gcd_mul_right_right d c],
apply gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd }
end
/-- If `k:ℕ` divides coprime `a` and `b` then `k = 1` -/
lemma eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes {a b k : ℕ} (h_ab_coprime : coprime a b)
(hka : k ∣ a) (hkb : k ∣ b) : k = 1 :=
begin
rw coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one at h_ab_coprime,
have h1 := dvd_gcd hka hkb,
rw h_ab_coprime at h1,
exact nat.dvd_one.mp h1,
end
lemma coprime.mul_add_mul_ne_mul {m n a b : ℕ} (cop : coprime m n) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * m + b * n ≠ m * n :=
begin
intro h,
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ : n ∣ a := cop.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
((nat.dvd_add_iff_left (dvd_mul_left n b)).mpr ((congr_arg _ h).mpr (dvd_mul_left n m))),
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ : m ∣ b := cop.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
((nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_left m (n*x))).mpr ((congr_arg _ h).mpr (dvd_mul_right m n))),
rw [mul_comm, mul_ne_zero_iff, ←one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb,
refine mul_ne_zero hb.2 ha.2 (eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_left (ne_of_gt (add_le_add ha.1 hb.1)) _),
rw [← mul_assoc, ← h, add_mul, add_mul, mul_comm _ n, ←mul_assoc, mul_comm y]
end
end nat
|
43f0877dea35d0e8a13833537a45558ade2ac379 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/analysis/normed_space/basic.lean | ea86773fbab3c2ab20cd185c446167601e754bc8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 59,154 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import topology.instances.nnreal
import topology.algebra.module
import topology.metric_space.antilipschitz
/-!
# Normed spaces
-/
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {ι : Type*}
noncomputable theory
open filter metric
open_locale topological_space big_operators nnreal ennreal
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`. This class is designed to
be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm. -/
class has_norm (α : Type*) := (norm : α → ℝ)
export has_norm (norm)
notation `∥`:1024 e:1 `∥`:1 := norm e
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ∥x - y∥` defines
a metric space structure. -/
class normed_group (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, add_comm_group α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
/-- Construct a normed group from a translation invariant distance -/
def normed_group.of_add_dist [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist x y ≤ dist (x + z) (y + z)) : normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 },
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this }
end }
/-- Construct a normed group from a translation invariant distance -/
def normed_group.of_add_dist' [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist (x + z) (y + z) ≤ dist x y) : normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this },
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 }
end }
/-- A normed group can be built from a norm that satisfies algebraic properties. This is
formalised in this structure. -/
structure normed_group.core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α] : Prop :=
(norm_eq_zero_iff : ∀ x : α, ∥x∥ = 0 ↔ x = 0)
(triangle : ∀ x y : α, ∥x + y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + ∥y∥)
(norm_neg : ∀ x : α, ∥-x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- Constructing a normed group from core properties of a norm, i.e., registering the distance and
the metric space structure from the norm properties. -/
noncomputable def normed_group.of_core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α]
(C : normed_group.core α) : normed_group α :=
{ dist := λ x y, ∥x - y∥,
dist_eq := assume x y, by refl,
dist_self := assume x, (C.norm_eq_zero_iff (x - x)).mpr (show x - x = 0, by simp),
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := assume x y h, sub_eq_zero.mp $ (C.norm_eq_zero_iff (x - y)).mp h,
dist_triangle := assume x y z,
calc ∥x - z∥ = ∥x - y + (y - z)∥ : by rw sub_add_sub_cancel
... ≤ ∥x - y∥ + ∥y - z∥ : C.triangle _ _,
dist_comm := assume x y,
calc ∥x - y∥ = ∥ -(y - x)∥ : by simp
... = ∥y - x∥ : by { rw [C.norm_neg] } }
instance : normed_group ℝ :=
{ norm := λ x, abs x,
dist_eq := assume x y, rfl }
lemma real.norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ∥r∥ = abs r := rfl
section normed_group
variables [normed_group α] [normed_group β]
lemma dist_eq_norm (g h : α) : dist g h = ∥g - h∥ :=
normed_group.dist_eq _ _
lemma dist_eq_norm' (g h : α) : dist g h = ∥h - g∥ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_zero_right (g : α) : dist g 0 = ∥g∥ :=
by rw [dist_eq_norm, sub_zero]
@[simp] lemma dist_zero_left : dist (0:α) = norm :=
funext $ λ g, by rw [dist_comm, dist_zero_right]
lemma tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top [proper_space α] :
tendsto norm (cocompact α) at_top :=
by simpa only [dist_zero_right] using tendsto_dist_right_cocompact_at_top (0:α)
lemma norm_sub_rev (g h : α) : ∥g - h∥ = ∥h - g∥ :=
by simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using dist_comm g h
@[simp] lemma norm_neg (g : α) : ∥-g∥ = ∥g∥ :=
by simpa using norm_sub_rev 0 g
@[simp] lemma dist_add_left (g h₁ h₂ : α) : dist (g + h₁) (g + h₂) = dist h₁ h₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_add_right (g₁ g₂ h : α) : dist (g₁ + h) (g₂ + h) = dist g₁ g₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_neg_neg (g h : α) : dist (-g) (-h) = dist g h :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, neg_sub_neg, norm_sub_rev]
@[simp] lemma dist_sub_left (g h₁ h₂ : α) : dist (g - h₁) (g - h₂) = dist h₁ h₂ :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, dist_add_left, dist_neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma dist_sub_right (g₁ g₂ h : α) : dist (g₁ - h) (g₂ - h) = dist g₁ g₂ :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using dist_add_right _ _ _
/-- Triangle inequality for the norm. -/
lemma norm_add_le (g h : α) : ∥g + h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using dist_triangle g 0 (-h)
lemma norm_add_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ : α} {n₁ n₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ∥g₁∥ ≤ n₁) (H₂ : ∥g₂∥ ≤ n₂) :
∥g₁ + g₂∥ ≤ n₁ + n₂ :=
le_trans (norm_add_le g₁ g₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ dist g₁ h₁ + dist g₂ h₂ :=
by simpa only [dist_add_left, dist_add_right] using dist_triangle (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂)
lemma dist_add_add_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α} {d₁ d₂ : ℝ}
(H₁ : dist g₁ h₁ ≤ d₁) (H₂ : dist g₂ h₂ ≤ d₂) :
dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ d₁ + d₂ :=
le_trans (dist_add_add_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_sub_sub_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
dist (g₁ - g₂) (h₁ - h₂) ≤ dist g₁ h₁ + dist g₂ h₂ :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, dist_neg_neg] using dist_add_add_le g₁ (-g₂) h₁ (-h₂)
lemma dist_sub_sub_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α} {d₁ d₂ : ℝ}
(H₁ : dist g₁ h₁ ≤ d₁) (H₂ : dist g₂ h₂ ≤ d₂) :
dist (g₁ - g₂) (h₁ - h₂) ≤ d₁ + d₂ :=
le_trans (dist_sub_sub_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma abs_dist_sub_le_dist_add_add (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
abs (dist g₁ h₁ - dist g₂ h₂) ≤ dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) :=
by simpa only [dist_add_left, dist_add_right, dist_comm h₂]
using abs_dist_sub_le (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) (h₁ + g₂)
@[simp] lemma norm_nonneg (g : α) : 0 ≤ ∥g∥ :=
by { rw[←dist_zero_right], exact dist_nonneg }
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_zero {g : α} : ∥g∥ = 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
dist_zero_right g ▸ dist_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma norm_zero : ∥(0:α)∥ = 0 := norm_eq_zero.2 rfl
@[nontriviality] lemma norm_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] (x : α) : ∥x∥ = 0 :=
by rw [subsingleton.elim x 0, norm_zero]
lemma norm_sum_le {β} : ∀(s : finset β) (f : β → α), ∥∑ a in s, f a∥ ≤ ∑ a in s, ∥ f a ∥ :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
lemma norm_sum_le_of_le {β} (s : finset β) {f : β → α} {n : β → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ∥f b∥ ≤ n b) :
∥∑ b in s, f b∥ ≤ ∑ b in s, n b :=
le_trans (norm_sum_le s f) (finset.sum_le_sum h)
@[simp] lemma norm_pos_iff {g : α} : 0 < ∥ g ∥ ↔ g ≠ 0 :=
dist_zero_right g ▸ dist_pos
@[simp] lemma norm_le_zero_iff {g : α} : ∥g∥ ≤ 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
by { rw[←dist_zero_right], exact dist_le_zero }
lemma eq_of_norm_sub_le_zero {g h : α} (a : ∥g - h∥ ≤ 0) : g = h :=
by rwa [← sub_eq_zero, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
lemma norm_sub_le (g h : α) : ∥g - h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using dist_triangle g 0 h
lemma norm_sub_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ : α} {n₁ n₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ∥g₁∥ ≤ n₁) (H₂ : ∥g₂∥ ≤ n₂) :
∥g₁ - g₂∥ ≤ n₁ + n₂ :=
le_trans (norm_sub_le g₁ g₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_le_norm_add_norm (g h : α) : dist g h ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by { rw dist_eq_norm, apply norm_sub_le }
lemma abs_norm_sub_norm_le (g h : α) : abs(∥g∥ - ∥h∥) ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using abs_dist_sub_le g h 0
lemma norm_sub_norm_le (g h : α) : ∥g∥ - ∥h∥ ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_norm_sub_norm_le g h)
lemma dist_norm_norm_le (g h : α) : dist ∥g∥ ∥h∥ ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le g h
lemma eq_of_norm_sub_eq_zero {u v : α} (h : ∥u - v∥ = 0) : u = v :=
begin
apply eq_of_dist_eq_zero,
rwa dist_eq_norm
end
lemma norm_sub_eq_zero_iff {u v : α} : ∥u - v∥ = 0 ↔ u = v :=
begin
convert dist_eq_zero,
rwa dist_eq_norm
end
lemma norm_le_insert (u v : α) : ∥v∥ ≤ ∥u∥ + ∥u - v∥ :=
calc ∥v∥ = ∥u - (u - v)∥ : by abel
... ≤ ∥u∥ + ∥u - v∥ : norm_sub_le u _
lemma ball_0_eq (ε : ℝ) : ball (0:α) ε = {x | ∥x∥ < ε} :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp
lemma mem_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ ball g r ↔ ∥h - g∥ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm]
lemma mem_ball_iff_norm' {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ ball g r ↔ ∥g - h∥ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm]
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ closed_ball g r ↔ ∥h - g∥ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm]
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm' {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ closed_ball g r ↔ ∥g - h∥ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball', dist_eq_norm]
lemma norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball {g h : α} {r : ℝ} (H : h ∈ closed_ball g r) :
∥h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + r :=
calc
∥h∥ = ∥g + (h - g)∥ : by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
... ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h - g∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... ≤ ∥g∥ + r : by { apply add_le_add_left, rw ← dist_eq_norm, exact H }
lemma norm_lt_of_mem_ball {g h : α} {r : ℝ} (H : h ∈ ball g r) :
∥h∥ < ∥g∥ + r :=
calc
∥h∥ = ∥g + (h - g)∥ : by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
... ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h - g∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... < ∥g∥ + r : by { apply add_lt_add_left, rw ← dist_eq_norm, exact H }
@[simp] lemma mem_sphere_iff_norm (v w : α) (r : ℝ) : w ∈ sphere v r ↔ ∥w - v∥ = r :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm {w : α} {r : ℝ} : w ∈ sphere (0:α) r ↔ ∥w∥ = r :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_of_mem_sphere {r : ℝ} (x : sphere (0:α) r) : ∥(x:α)∥ = r :=
mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm.mp x.2
lemma nonzero_of_mem_sphere {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : sphere (0:α) r) : (x:α) ≠ 0 :=
by rwa [← norm_pos_iff, norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
lemma nonzero_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (0:α) 1) : (x:α) ≠ 0 :=
by { apply nonzero_of_mem_sphere, norm_num }
/-- We equip the sphere, in a normed group, with a formal operation of negation, namely the
antipodal map. -/
instance {r : ℝ} : has_neg (sphere (0:α) r) :=
{ neg := λ w, ⟨-↑w, by simp⟩ }
@[simp] lemma coe_neg_sphere {r : ℝ} (v : sphere (0:α) r) :
(((-v) : sphere _ _) : α) = - (v:α) :=
rfl
theorem normed_group.tendsto_nhds_zero {f : γ → α} {l : filter γ} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ∥ f x ∥ < ε :=
metric.tendsto_nhds.trans $ by simp only [dist_zero_right]
lemma normed_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : α → β} {x : α} {y : β} :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ∥x' - x∥ < δ → ∥f x' - y∥ < ε :=
by simp_rw [metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of normed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that for
all `x`, one has `∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥`.
The analogous condition for a linear map of normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
lemma add_monoid_hom.lipschitz_of_bound (f :α →+ β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
lipschitz_with (nnreal.of_real C) f :=
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le' $ λ x y, by simpa only [dist_eq_norm, f.map_sub] using h (x - y)
lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le {f : α → β} {C : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} :
lipschitz_on_with C f s ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ∥f x - f y∥ ≤ C * ∥x - y∥ :=
by simp only [lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm]
lemma lipschitz_on_with.norm_sub_le {f : α → β} {C : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} (h : lipschitz_on_with C f s)
{x y : α} (x_in : x ∈ s) (y_in : y ∈ s) : ∥f x - f y∥ ≤ C * ∥x - y∥ :=
lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le.mp h x x_in y y_in
/-- A homomorphism `f` of normed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that for
all `x`, one has `∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥`.
The analogous condition for a linear map of normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
lemma add_monoid_hom.continuous_of_bound (f :α →+ β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
continuous f :=
(f.lipschitz_of_bound C h).continuous
section nnnorm
/-- Version of the norm taking values in nonnegative reals. -/
def nnnorm (a : α) : ℝ≥0 := ⟨norm a, norm_nonneg a⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nnnorm (a : α) : (nnnorm a : ℝ) = norm a := rfl
lemma nndist_eq_nnnorm (a b : α) : nndist a b = nnnorm (a - b) := nnreal.eq $ dist_eq_norm _ _
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq_zero {a : α} : nnnorm a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, nnreal.coe_zero, coe_nnnorm, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_zero : nnnorm (0 : α) = 0 :=
nnreal.eq norm_zero
lemma nnnorm_add_le (g h : α) : nnnorm (g + h) ≤ nnnorm g + nnnorm h :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ norm_add_le g h
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_neg (g : α) : nnnorm (-g) = nnnorm g :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_neg g
lemma nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le (g h : α) : nndist (nnnorm g) (nnnorm h) ≤ nnnorm (g - h) :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ dist_norm_norm_le g h
lemma of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm (x : β) : ennreal.of_real ∥x∥ = (nnnorm x : ℝ≥0∞) :=
ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal _
lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub (x y : β) : edist x y = (nnnorm (x - y) : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm (x : β) : edist x 0 = (nnnorm x : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, _root_.sub_zero]
lemma mem_emetric_ball_0_iff {x : β} {r : ℝ≥0∞} : x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : β) r ↔ ↑(nnnorm x) < r :=
by rw [emetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma nndist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
nndist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ nndist g₁ h₁ + nndist g₂ h₂ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ dist_add_add_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂
lemma edist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
edist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ edist g₁ h₁ + edist g₂ h₂ :=
by { simp only [edist_nndist], norm_cast, apply nndist_add_add_le }
lemma nnnorm_sum_le {β} : ∀(s : finset β) (f : β → α),
nnnorm (∑ a in s, f a) ≤ ∑ a in s, nnnorm (f a) :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive nnnorm nnnorm_zero nnnorm_add_le
end nnnorm
lemma lipschitz_with.neg {α : Type*} [emetric_space α] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with K f) : lipschitz_with K (λ x, -f x) :=
λ x y, by simpa only [edist_dist, dist_neg_neg] using hf x y
lemma lipschitz_with.add {α : Type*} [emetric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x + g x) :=
λ x y,
calc edist (f x + g x) (f y + g y) ≤ edist (f x) (f y) + edist (g x) (g y) :
edist_add_add_le _ _ _ _
... ≤ Kf * edist x y + Kg * edist x y :
add_le_add (hf x y) (hg x y)
... = (Kf + Kg) * edist x y :
(add_mul _ _ _).symm
lemma lipschitz_with.sub {α : Type*} [emetric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x - g x) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
lemma antilipschitz_with.add_lipschitz_with {α : Type*} [metric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g)
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) :
antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ (λ x, f x + g x) :=
begin
refine antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist (λ x y, _),
rw [nnreal.coe_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
rw le_div_iff (nnreal.coe_pos.2 $ nnreal.sub_pos.2 hK),
rw [mul_comm, nnreal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hK), sub_mul],
calc ↑Kf⁻¹ * dist x y - Kg * dist x y ≤ dist (f x) (f y) - dist (g x) (g y) :
sub_le_sub (hf.mul_le_dist x y) (hg.dist_le_mul x y)
... ≤ _ : le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_dist_sub_le_dist_add_add _ _ _ _)
end
/-- A subgroup of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance add_subgroup.normed_group {E : Type*} [normed_group E] (s : add_subgroup E) :
normed_group s :=
{ norm := λx, norm (x : E),
dist_eq := λx y, dist_eq_norm (x : E) (y : E) }
/-- If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a normed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to its
norm in `E`. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_norm_subgroup {E : Type*} [normed_group E] {s : add_subgroup E} (x : s) :
∥x∥ = ∥(x:E)∥ :=
rfl
/-- A submodule of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance submodule.normed_group {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} (s : submodule 𝕜 E) : normed_group s :=
{ norm := λx, norm (x : E),
dist_eq := λx y, dist_eq_norm (x : E) (y : E) }
/-- If `x` is an element of a submodule `s` of a normed group `E`, its norm in `E` is equal to its
norm in `s`.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma submodule.norm_coe {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} {s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : s) :
∥(x : E)∥ = ∥x∥ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma submodule.norm_mk {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} {s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : E) (hx : x ∈ s) :
∥(⟨x, hx⟩ : s)∥ = ∥x∥ :=
rfl
/-- normed group instance on the product of two normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_group : normed_group (α × β) :=
{ norm := λx, max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥,
dist_eq := assume (x y : α × β),
show max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) = (max ∥(x - y).1∥ ∥(x - y).2∥), by simp [dist_eq_norm] }
lemma prod.norm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥ = (max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥) := rfl
lemma prod.nnnorm_def (x : α × β) : nnnorm x = max (nnnorm x.1) (nnnorm x.2) :=
by { have := x.norm_def, simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at this, exact_mod_cast this }
lemma norm_fst_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.1∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_left _ _
lemma norm_snd_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.2∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_right _ _
lemma norm_prod_le_iff {x : α × β} {r : ℝ} :
∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∥x.1∥ ≤ r ∧ ∥x.2∥ ≤ r :=
max_le_iff
/-- normed group instance on the product of finitely many normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_group {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] :
normed_group (Πi, π i) :=
{ norm := λf, ((finset.sup finset.univ (λ b, nnnorm (f b)) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ),
dist_eq := assume x y,
congr_arg (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) $ congr_arg (finset.sup finset.univ) $ funext $ assume a,
show nndist (x a) (y a) = nnnorm (x a - y a), from nndist_eq_nnnorm _ _ }
/-- The norm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_norm_le_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r)
{x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ ≤ r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_le_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
/-- The norm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_norm_lt_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r)
{x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ < r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ < r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_lt_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
lemma norm_le_pi_norm {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] (x : Πi, π i) (i : ι) :
∥x i∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
(pi_norm_le_iff (norm_nonneg x)).1 (le_refl _) i
@[simp] lemma pi_norm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) : ∥(λ i : ι, a)∥ = ∥a∥ :=
by simpa only [← dist_zero_right] using dist_pi_const a 0
@[simp] lemma pi_nnnorm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) :
nnnorm (λ i : ι, a) = nnnorm a :=
nnreal.eq $ pi_norm_const a
lemma tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : ι → β} {a : filter ι} {b : β} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥f e - b∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { convert tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero, simp [dist_eq_norm] }
lemma tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : γ → β} {a : filter γ} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 0) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥f e∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw [tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero], simp only [sub_zero] }
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `g` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`.
In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of
similar lemmas in `topology.metric_space.basic` and `topology.algebra.ordered`, the `'` version is
phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely. -/
lemma squeeze_zero_norm' {f : γ → α} {g : γ → ℝ} {t₀ : filter γ}
(h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ∥f n∥ ≤ g n)
(h' : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr
(squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall (λ n, norm_nonneg _)) h h')
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `g` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`. -/
lemma squeeze_zero_norm {f : γ → α} {g : γ → ℝ} {t₀ : filter γ}
(h : ∀ (n:γ), ∥f n∥ ≤ g n)
(h' : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) :
tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_of_forall h) h'
lemma tendsto_norm_sub_self (x : α) : tendsto (λ g : α, ∥g - x∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ g, (x:α)) (𝓝 x) _)
lemma tendsto_norm {x : α} : tendsto (λg : α, ∥g∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 ∥x∥) :=
by simpa using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ g, (0:α)) _ _)
lemma tendsto_norm_zero : tendsto (λg : α, ∥g∥) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa using tendsto_norm_sub_self (0:α)
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_norm : continuous (λg:α, ∥g∥) :=
by simpa using continuous_id.dist (continuous_const : continuous (λ g, (0:α)))
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_nnnorm : continuous (nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0) :=
continuous_subtype_mk _ continuous_norm
lemma lipschitz_with_one_norm : lipschitz_with 1 (norm : α → ℝ) :=
by simpa only [dist_zero_left] using lipschitz_with.dist_right (0 : α)
lemma uniform_continuous_norm : uniform_continuous (norm : α → ℝ) :=
lipschitz_with_one_norm.uniform_continuous
lemma uniform_continuous_nnnorm : uniform_continuous (nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0) :=
uniform_continuous_subtype_mk uniform_continuous_norm _
lemma tendsto_norm_nhds_within_zero : tendsto (norm : α → ℝ) (𝓝[{0}ᶜ] 0) (𝓝[set.Ioi 0] 0) :=
(continuous_norm.tendsto' (0 : α) 0 norm_zero).inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $
λ x, norm_pos_iff.2
section
variables {l : filter γ} {f : γ → α} {a : α}
lemma filter.tendsto.norm {a : α} (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : tendsto (λ x, ∥f x∥) l (𝓝 ∥a∥) :=
tendsto_norm.comp h
lemma filter.tendsto.nnnorm (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, nnnorm (f x)) l (𝓝 (nnnorm a)) :=
tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm.continuous_at h
end
section
variables [topological_space γ] {f : γ → α} {s : set γ} {a : γ} {b : α}
lemma continuous.norm (h : continuous f) : continuous (λ x, ∥f x∥) := continuous_norm.comp h
lemma continuous.nnnorm (h : continuous f) : continuous (λ x, nnnorm (f x)) :=
continuous_nnnorm.comp h
lemma continuous_at.norm (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ∥f x∥) a := h.norm
lemma continuous_at.nnnorm (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, nnnorm (f x)) a := h.nnnorm
lemma continuous_within_at.norm (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ∥f x∥) s a :=
h.norm
lemma continuous_within_at.nnnorm (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, nnnorm (f x)) s a :=
h.nnnorm
lemma continuous_on.norm (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ∥f x∥) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).norm
lemma continuous_on.nnnorm (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, nnnorm (f x)) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).nnnorm
end
/-- If `∥y∥→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any fixed `x`. -/
lemma eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top {l : filter γ} {f : γ → α}
(h : tendsto (λ y, ∥f y∥) l at_top) (x : α) :
∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
begin
have : ∀ᶠ y in l, 1 + ∥x∥ ≤ ∥f y∥ := h (mem_at_top (1 + ∥x∥)),
refine this.mono (λ y hy hxy, _),
subst x,
exact not_le_of_lt zero_lt_one (add_le_iff_nonpos_left.1 hy)
end
/-- A normed group is a uniform additive group, i.e., addition and subtraction are uniformly
continuous. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_uniform_group : uniform_add_group α :=
⟨(lipschitz_with.prod_fst.sub lipschitz_with.prod_snd).uniform_continuous⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_monoid : has_continuous_add α :=
by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_group : topological_add_group α :=
by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
lemma nat.norm_cast_le [has_one α] : ∀ n : ℕ, ∥(n : α)∥ ≤ n * ∥(1 : α)∥
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := by { rw [n.cast_succ, n.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul],
exact norm_add_le_of_le (nat.norm_cast_le n) le_rfl }
end normed_group
section normed_ring
/-- A normed ring is a ring endowed with a norm which satisfies the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_ring (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, ring α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) ≤ norm a * norm b)
/-- A normed commutative ring is a commutative ring endowed with a norm which satisfies
the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_comm_ring (α : Type*) extends normed_ring α :=
(mul_comm : ∀ x y : α, x * y = y * x)
/-- A mixin class with the axiom `∥1∥ = 1`. Many `normed_ring`s and all `normed_field`s satisfy this
axiom. -/
class norm_one_class (α : Type*) [has_norm α] [has_one α] : Prop :=
(norm_one : ∥(1:α)∥ = 1)
export norm_one_class (norm_one)
attribute [simp] norm_one
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_one [normed_group α] [has_one α] [norm_one_class α] : nnnorm (1:α) = 1 :=
nnreal.eq norm_one
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_comm_ring.to_comm_ring [β : normed_comm_ring α] : comm_ring α := { ..β }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring.to_normed_group [β : normed_ring α] : normed_group α := { ..β }
instance prod.norm_one_class [normed_group α] [has_one α] [norm_one_class α]
[normed_group β] [has_one β] [norm_one_class β] :
norm_one_class (α × β) :=
⟨by simp [prod.norm_def]⟩
variables [normed_ring α]
lemma norm_mul_le (a b : α) : (∥a*b∥) ≤ (∥a∥) * (∥b∥) :=
normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
lemma list.norm_prod_le' : ∀ {l : list α}, l ≠ [] → ∥l.prod∥ ≤ (l.map norm).prod
| [] h := (h rfl).elim
| [a] _ := by simp
| (a :: b :: l) _ :=
begin
rw [list.map_cons, list.prod_cons, @list.prod_cons _ _ _ ∥a∥],
refine le_trans (norm_mul_le _ _) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _)),
exact list.norm_prod_le' (list.cons_ne_nil b l)
end
lemma list.norm_prod_le [norm_one_class α] : ∀ l : list α, ∥l.prod∥ ≤ (l.map norm).prod
| [] := by simp
| (a::l) := list.norm_prod_le' (list.cons_ne_nil a l)
lemma finset.norm_prod_le' {α : Type*} [normed_comm_ring α] (s : finset ι) (hs : s.nonempty)
(f : ι → α) :
∥∏ i in s, f i∥ ≤ ∏ i in s, ∥f i∥ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩,
have : l.map f ≠ [], by simpa using hs,
simpa using list.norm_prod_le' this
end
lemma finset.norm_prod_le {α : Type*} [normed_comm_ring α] [norm_one_class α] (s : finset ι)
(f : ι → α) :
∥∏ i in s, f i∥ ≤ ∏ i in s, ∥f i∥ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩,
simpa using (l.map f).norm_prod_le
end
/-- If `α` is a normed ring, then `∥a^n∥≤ ∥a∥^n` for `n > 0`. See also `norm_pow_le`. -/
lemma norm_pow_le' (a : α) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 1 h := by simp
| (n+2) h :=
le_trans (norm_mul_le a (a^(n+1)))
(mul_le_mul (le_refl _)
(norm_pow_le' (nat.succ_pos _)) (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _))
/-- If `α` is a normed ring with `∥1∥=1`, then `∥a^n∥≤ ∥a∥^n`. See also `norm_pow_le'`. -/
lemma norm_pow_le [norm_one_class α] (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := norm_pow_le' a n.zero_lt_succ
lemma eventually_norm_pow_le (a : α) : ∀ᶠ (n:ℕ) in at_top, ∥a ^ n∥ ≤ ∥a∥ ^ n :=
eventually_at_top.mpr ⟨1, λ b h, norm_pow_le' a (nat.succ_le_iff.mp h)⟩
lemma units.norm_pos [nontrivial α] (x : units α) : 0 < ∥(x:α)∥ :=
norm_pos_iff.mpr (units.ne_zero x)
/-- In a normed ring, the left-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_left_bound (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_left x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
norm_mul_le x
/-- In a normed ring, the right-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_right_bound (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_right x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
λ y, by {rw mul_comm, convert norm_mul_le y x}
/-- Normed ring structure on the product of two normed rings, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_ring [normed_ring β] : normed_ring (α × β) :=
{ norm_mul := assume x y,
calc
∥x * y∥ = ∥(x.1*y.1, x.2*y.2)∥ : rfl
... = (max ∥x.1*y.1∥ ∥x.2*y.2∥) : rfl
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥x.2∥*∥y.2∥)) :
max_le_max (norm_mul_le (x.1) (y.1)) (norm_mul_le (x.2) (y.2))
... = (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥*∥x.2∥)) : by simp[mul_comm]
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.2∥) (∥y.1∥)) :
by apply max_mul_mul_le_max_mul_max; simp [norm_nonneg]
... = (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥)) : by simp [max_comm]
... = (∥x∥*∥y∥) : rfl,
..prod.normed_group }
end normed_ring
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring_top_monoid [normed_ring α] : has_continuous_mul α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
begin
have : ∀ e : α × α, ∥e.1 * e.2 - x.1 * x.2∥ ≤ ∥e.1∥ * ∥e.2 - x.2∥ + ∥e.1 - x.1∥ * ∥x.2∥,
{ intro e,
calc ∥e.1 * e.2 - x.1 * x.2∥ ≤ ∥e.1 * (e.2 - x.2) + (e.1 - x.1) * x.2∥ :
by rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel]
... ≤ ∥e.1∥ * ∥e.2 - x.2∥ + ∥e.1 - x.1∥ * ∥x.2∥ :
norm_add_le_of_le (norm_mul_le _ _) (norm_mul_le _ _) },
refine squeeze_zero (λ e, norm_nonneg _) this _,
convert ((continuous_fst.tendsto x).norm.mul ((continuous_snd.tendsto x).sub
tendsto_const_nhds).norm).add
(((continuous_fst.tendsto x).sub tendsto_const_nhds).norm.mul _),
show tendsto _ _ _, from tendsto_const_nhds,
simp
end ⟩
/-- A normed ring is a topological ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_ring [normed_ring α] : topological_ring α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
have ∀ e : α, -e - -x = -(e - x), by intro; simp,
by simp only [this, norm_neg]; apply tendsto_norm_sub_self ⟩
/-- A normed field is a field with a norm satisfying ∥x y∥ = ∥x∥ ∥y∥. -/
class normed_field (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, field α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul' : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) = norm a * norm b)
/-- A nondiscrete normed field is a normed field in which there is an element of norm different from
`0` and `1`. This makes it possible to bring any element arbitrarily close to `0` by multiplication
by the powers of any element, and thus to relate algebra and topology. -/
class nondiscrete_normed_field (α : Type*) extends normed_field α :=
(non_trivial : ∃x:α, 1<∥x∥)
namespace normed_field
section normed_field
variables [normed_field α]
@[simp] lemma norm_mul (a b : α) : ∥a * b∥ = ∥a∥ * ∥b∥ :=
normed_field.norm_mul' a b
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance to_normed_comm_ring : normed_comm_ring α :=
{ norm_mul := λ a b, (norm_mul a b).le, ..‹normed_field α› }
@[priority 900]
instance to_norm_one_class : norm_one_class α :=
⟨mul_left_cancel' (mt norm_eq_zero.1 (@one_ne_zero α _ _)) $
by rw [← norm_mul, mul_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_mul (a b : α) : nnnorm (a * b) = nnnorm a * nnnorm b :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_mul a b
/-- `norm` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps] def norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ := ⟨norm, norm_zero, norm_one, norm_mul⟩
/-- `nnnorm` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps] def nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0 :=
⟨nnnorm, nnnorm_zero, nnnorm_one, nnnorm_mul⟩
@[simp] lemma norm_pow (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a ^ n∥ = ∥a∥ ^ n :=
norm_hom.to_monoid_hom.map_pow a
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : nnnorm (a ^ n) = nnnorm a ^ n :=
nnnorm_hom.to_monoid_hom.map_pow a n
@[simp] lemma norm_prod (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∥∏ b in s, f b∥ = ∏ b in s, ∥f b∥ :=
(norm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ).map_prod f s
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_prod (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
nnnorm (∏ b in s, f b) = ∏ b in s, nnnorm (f b) :=
(nnnorm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ≥0).map_prod f s
@[simp] lemma norm_div (a b : α) : ∥a / b∥ = ∥a∥ / ∥b∥ :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_div a b
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_div (a b : α) : nnnorm (a / b) = nnnorm a / nnnorm b :=
(nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0).map_div a b
@[simp] lemma norm_inv (a : α) : ∥a⁻¹∥ = ∥a∥⁻¹ :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_inv' a
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_inv (a : α) : nnnorm (a⁻¹) = (nnnorm a)⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_fpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ∥a^n∥ = ∥a∥^n :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_fpow
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_fpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), nnnorm (a^n) = (nnnorm a)^n :=
(nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0).map_fpow
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance : has_continuous_inv' α :=
begin
refine ⟨λ r r0, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 _⟩,
have r0' : 0 < ∥r∥ := norm_pos_iff.2 r0,
rcases exists_between r0' with ⟨ε, ε0, εr⟩,
have : ∀ᶠ e in 𝓝 r, ∥e⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ ≤ ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ε,
{ filter_upwards [(is_open_lt continuous_const continuous_norm).eventually_mem εr],
intros e he,
have e0 : e ≠ 0 := norm_pos_iff.1 (ε0.trans he),
calc ∥e⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ = ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ∥e∥ : by field_simp [mul_comm]
... ≤ ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ε :
div_le_div_of_le_left (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) ε0 he.le },
refine squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall $ λ _, norm_nonneg _) this _,
refine (continuous_const.sub continuous_id).norm.div_const.div_const.tendsto' _ _ _,
simp
end
end normed_field
variables (α) [nondiscrete_normed_field α]
lemma exists_one_lt_norm : ∃x : α, 1 < ∥x∥ := ‹nondiscrete_normed_field α›.non_trivial
lemma exists_norm_lt_one : ∃x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < 1 :=
begin
rcases exists_one_lt_norm α with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine ⟨y⁻¹, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [inv_eq_zero, ne.def, norm_pos_iff],
rintro rfl,
rw norm_zero at hy,
exact lt_asymm zero_lt_one hy },
{ simp [inv_lt_one hy] }
end
lemma exists_lt_norm (r : ℝ) : ∃ x : α, r < ∥x∥ :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := pow_unbounded_of_one_lt r hw in
⟨w^n, by rwa norm_pow⟩
lemma exists_norm_lt {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : ∃ x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < r :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hle, hlt⟩ := exists_int_pow_near' hr hw in
⟨w^n, by { rw norm_fpow; exact fpow_pos_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hw) _},
by rwa norm_fpow⟩
variable {α}
@[instance]
lemma punctured_nhds_ne_bot (x : α) : ne_bot (𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x) :=
begin
rw [← mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot, metric.mem_closure_iff],
rintros ε ε0,
rcases normed_field.exists_norm_lt α ε0 with ⟨b, hb0, hbε⟩,
refine ⟨x + b, mt (set.mem_singleton_iff.trans add_right_eq_self).1 $ norm_pos_iff.1 hb0, _⟩,
rwa [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel'],
end
@[instance]
lemma nhds_within_is_unit_ne_bot : ne_bot (𝓝[{x : α | is_unit x}] 0) :=
by simpa only [is_unit_iff_ne_zero] using punctured_nhds_ne_bot (0:α)
end normed_field
instance : normed_field ℝ :=
{ norm_mul' := abs_mul,
.. real.normed_group }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℝ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
namespace real
lemma norm_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∥x∥ = x :=
abs_of_nonneg hx
@[simp] lemma norm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℝ)∥ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : nnnorm (n : ℝ) = n := nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_two : ∥(2:ℝ)∥ = 2 := abs_of_pos (@zero_lt_two ℝ _ _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_two : nnnorm (2:ℝ) = 2 := nnreal.eq $ by simp
lemma nnnorm_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : nnnorm x = ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_of_nonneg hx
lemma ennnorm_eq_of_real {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (nnnorm x : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real x :=
by { rw [← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, norm_of_nonneg hx] }
end real
namespace nnreal
open_locale nnreal
@[simp] lemma norm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : ∥(x : ℝ)∥ = x :=
by rw [real.norm_eq_abs, x.abs_eq]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : nnnorm (x : ℝ) = x :=
nnreal.eq $ real.norm_of_nonneg x.2
end nnreal
@[simp] lemma norm_norm [normed_group α] (x : α) : ∥∥x∥∥ = ∥x∥ :=
real.norm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_norm [normed_group α] (a : α) : nnnorm ∥a∥ = nnnorm a :=
by simp only [nnnorm, norm_norm]
/-- A restatement of `metric_space.tendsto_at_top` in terms of the norm. -/
lemma normed_group.tendsto_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {β : Type*} [normed_group β]
{f : α → β} {b : β} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → ∥f n - b∥ < ε :=
(at_top_basis.tendsto_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).trans (by simp [dist_eq_norm])
/--
A variant of `normed_group.tendsto_at_top` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
lemma normed_group.tendsto_at_top' [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [no_top_order α]
{β : Type*} [normed_group β]
{f : α → β} {b : β} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N < n → ∥f n - b∥ < ε :=
(at_top_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).trans (by simp [dist_eq_norm])
instance : normed_comm_ring ℤ :=
{ norm := λ n, ∥(n : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul := λ m n, le_of_eq $ by simp only [norm, int.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ m n, by simp only [int.dist_eq, norm, int.cast_sub],
mul_comm := mul_comm }
@[norm_cast] lemma int.norm_cast_real (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℝ)∥ = ∥m∥ := rfl
instance : norm_one_class ℤ :=
⟨by simp [← int.norm_cast_real]⟩
instance : normed_field ℚ :=
{ norm := λ r, ∥(r : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul' := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [norm, rat.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [rat.dist_eq, norm, rat.cast_sub] }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℚ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma rat.norm_cast_real (r : ℚ) : ∥(r : ℝ)∥ = ∥r∥ := rfl
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma int.norm_cast_rat (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℚ)∥ = ∥m∥ :=
by rw [← rat.norm_cast_real, ← int.norm_cast_real]; congr' 1; norm_cast
section normed_space
section prio
set_option extends_priority 920
-- Here, we set a rather high priority for the instance `[normed_space α β] : semimodule α β`
-- to take precedence over `semiring.to_semimodule` as this leads to instance paths with better
-- unification properties.
-- see Note[vector space definition] for why we extend `semimodule`.
/-- A normed space over a normed field is a vector space endowed with a norm which satisfies the
equality `∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥`. We require only `∥c • x∥ ≤ ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in the definition, then prove
`∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in `norm_smul`. -/
class normed_space (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [normed_field α] [normed_group β]
extends semimodule α β :=
(norm_smul_le : ∀ (a:α) (b:β), ∥a • b∥ ≤ ∥a∥ * ∥b∥)
end prio
variables [normed_field α] [normed_group β]
instance normed_field.to_normed_space : normed_space α α :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a b, le_of_eq (normed_field.norm_mul a b) }
lemma norm_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : ∥s • x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ :=
begin
classical,
by_cases h : s = 0,
{ simp [h] },
{ refine le_antisymm (normed_space.norm_smul_le s x) _,
calc ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥s⁻¹ • s • x∥ : by rw [inv_smul_smul' h]
... ≤ ∥s∥ * (∥s⁻¹∥ * ∥s • x∥) : _
... = ∥s • x∥ : _,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (normed_space.norm_smul_le _ _) (norm_nonneg _),
rw [normed_field.norm_inv, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul],
rwa [ne.def, norm_eq_zero] }
end
@[simp] lemma abs_norm_eq_norm (z : β) : abs ∥z∥ = ∥z∥ :=
(abs_eq (norm_nonneg z)).mpr (or.inl rfl)
lemma dist_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) : dist (s • x) (s • y) = ∥s∥ * dist x y :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, (norm_smul _ _).symm, smul_sub]
lemma nnnorm_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : nnnorm (s • x) = nnnorm s * nnnorm x :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_smul s x
lemma nndist_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) :
nndist (s • x) (s • y) = nnnorm s * nndist x y :=
nnreal.eq $ dist_smul s x y
lemma norm_smul_of_nonneg [normed_space ℝ β] {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 ≤ t) (x : β) : ∥t • x∥ = t * ∥x∥ :=
by rw [norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ht]
variables {E : Type*} {F : Type*}
[normed_group E] [normed_space α E] [normed_group F] [normed_space α F]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_space.topological_vector_space : topological_vector_space α E :=
begin
refine { continuous_smul := continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $
λ p, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 _ },
refine squeeze_zero (λ _, norm_nonneg _) _ _,
{ exact λ q, ∥q.1 - p.1∥ * ∥q.2∥ + ∥p.1∥ * ∥q.2 - p.2∥ },
{ intro q,
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel, ← norm_smul, ← norm_smul, smul_sub, sub_smul],
exact norm_add_le _ _ },
{ conv { congr, skip, skip, congr, rw [← zero_add (0:ℝ)], congr,
rw [← zero_mul ∥p.2∥], skip, rw [← mul_zero ∥p.1∥] },
exact ((tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_fst.tendsto p)).mul
(continuous_snd.tendsto p).norm).add
(tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_snd.tendsto p))) }
end
theorem closure_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
closure (ball x r) = closed_ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm closure_ball_subset_closed_ball (λ y hy, _),
have : continuous_within_at (λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x) (set.Ico 0 1) 1 :=
((continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const).continuous_within_at,
convert this.mem_closure _ _,
{ rw [one_smul, sub_add_cancel] },
{ simp [closure_Ico (@zero_lt_one ℝ _ _), zero_le_one] },
{ rintros c ⟨hc0, hc1⟩,
rw [set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg hc0, mul_comm, ← mul_one r],
rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hy,
apply mul_lt_mul'; assumption }
end
theorem frontier_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (ball x r) = sphere x r :=
begin
rw [frontier, closure_ball x hr, is_open_ball.interior_eq],
ext x, exact (@eq_iff_le_not_lt ℝ _ _ _).symm
end
theorem interior_closed_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm _ ball_subset_interior_closed_ball,
intros y hy,
rcases le_iff_lt_or_eq.1 (mem_closed_ball.1 $ interior_subset hy) with hr|rfl, { exact hr },
set f : ℝ → E := λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x,
suffices : f ⁻¹' closed_ball x (dist y x) ⊆ set.Icc (-1) 1,
{ have hfc : continuous f := (continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const,
have hf1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ f ⁻¹' (interior (closed_ball x $ dist y x)), by simpa [f],
have h1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ interior (set.Icc (-1:ℝ) 1) :=
interior_mono this (preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hfc hf1),
contrapose h1,
simp },
intros c hc,
rw [set.mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_le_mul_right hr],
simpa [f, dist_eq_norm, norm_smul] using hc
end
theorem interior_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with hr|rfl|hr,
{ simp [closed_ball_eq_empty_iff_neg.2 hr, ball_eq_empty_iff_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt hr)] },
{ suffices : x ∉ interior {x},
{ rw [ball_zero, closed_ball_zero, ← set.subset_empty_iff],
intros y hy,
obtain rfl : y = x := set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (interior_subset hy),
exact this hy },
rw [← set.mem_compl_iff, ← closure_compl],
rcases exists_ne (0 : E) with ⟨z, hz⟩,
suffices : (λ c : ℝ, x + c • z) 0 ∈ closure ({x}ᶜ : set E),
by simpa only [zero_smul, add_zero] using this,
have : (0:ℝ) ∈ closure (set.Ioi (0:ℝ)), by simp [closure_Ioi],
refine (continuous_const.add (continuous_id.smul
continuous_const)).continuous_within_at.mem_closure this _,
intros c hc,
simp [smul_eq_zero, hz, ne_of_gt hc] },
{ exact interior_closed_ball x hr }
end
theorem frontier_closed_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball x hr,
closed_ball_diff_ball]
theorem frontier_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball' x r, closed_ball_diff_ball]
variables (α)
lemma ne_neg_of_mem_sphere [char_zero α] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : sphere (0:E) r) : x ≠ - x :=
λ h, nonzero_of_mem_sphere hr x (eq_zero_of_eq_neg α (by { conv_lhs {rw h}, simp }))
lemma ne_neg_of_mem_unit_sphere [char_zero α] (x : sphere (0:E) 1) : x ≠ - x :=
ne_neg_of_mem_sphere α (by norm_num) x
variables {α}
open normed_field
/-- If there is a scalar `c` with `∥c∥>1`, then any element can be moved by scalar multiplication to
any shell of width `∥c∥`. Also recap information on the norm of the rescaling element that shows
up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell {c : α} (hc : 1 < ∥c∥) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃d:α, d ≠ 0 ∧ ∥d • x∥ < ε ∧ (ε/∥c∥ ≤ ∥d • x∥) ∧ (∥d∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥) :=
begin
have xεpos : 0 < ∥x∥/ε := div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hx) εpos,
rcases exists_int_pow_near xεpos hc with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have cpos : 0 < ∥c∥ := lt_trans (zero_lt_one : (0 :ℝ) < 1) hc,
have cnpos : 0 < ∥c^(n+1)∥ := by { rw norm_fpow, exact lt_trans xεpos hn.2 },
refine ⟨(c^(n+1))⁻¹, _, _, _, _⟩,
show (c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ ≠ 0,
by rwa [ne.def, inv_eq_zero, ← ne.def, ← norm_pos_iff],
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥ < ε,
{ rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff cnpos, mul_comm, norm_fpow],
exact (div_lt_iff εpos).1 (hn.2) },
show ε / ∥c∥ ≤ ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥,
{ rw [div_le_iff cpos, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_fpow, fpow_add (ne_of_gt cpos),
fpow_one, mul_inv_rev', mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt cpos),
one_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff (fpow_pos_of_pos cpos _), mul_comm],
exact (le_div_iff εpos).1 hn.1 },
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
{ have : ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥ = ε⁻¹ * ∥x∥ * ∥c∥, by ring,
rw [norm_inv, inv_inv', norm_fpow, fpow_add (ne_of_gt cpos), fpow_one, this, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hn.1 (norm_nonneg _) }
end
/-- The product of two normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance : normed_space α (E × F) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, le_of_eq $ by simp [prod.norm_def, norm_smul, mul_max_of_nonneg],
-- TODO: without the next two lines Lean unfolds `≤` to `real.le`
add_smul := λ r x y, prod.ext (add_smul _ _ _) (add_smul _ _ _),
smul_add := λ r x y, prod.ext (smul_add _ _ _) (smul_add _ _ _),
..prod.normed_group,
..prod.semimodule }
/-- The product of finitely many normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_space {E : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (E i)]
[∀i, normed_space α (E i)] : normed_space α (Πi, E i) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a f, le_of_eq $
show (↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), nnnorm (a • f b))) : ℝ) =
nnnorm a * ↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), nnnorm (f b))),
by simp only [(nnreal.coe_mul _ _).symm, nnreal.mul_finset_sup, nnnorm_smul] }
/-- A subspace of a normed space is also a normed space, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance submodule.normed_space {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] (s : submodule 𝕜 E) : normed_space 𝕜 s :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ norm_smul c (x : E) }
end normed_space
section normed_algebra
/-- A normed algebra `𝕜'` over `𝕜` is an algebra endowed with a norm for which the embedding of
`𝕜` in `𝕜'` is an isometry. -/
class normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_ring 𝕜']
extends algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
(norm_algebra_map_eq : ∀x:𝕜, ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥)
@[simp] lemma norm_algebra_map_eq {𝕜 : Type*} (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_ring 𝕜']
[h : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] (x : 𝕜) : ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
normed_algebra.norm_algebra_map_eq _
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
variables (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_ring 𝕜']
@[priority 100]
instance normed_algebra.to_normed_space [h : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : normed_space 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, calc
∥s • x∥ = ∥((algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜') s) * x∥ : by { rw h.smul_def', refl }
... ≤ ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' s∥ * ∥x∥ : normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
... = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ : by rw norm_algebra_map_eq,
..h }
instance normed_algebra.id : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜 :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := by simp,
.. algebra.id 𝕜}
variables (𝕜') [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
include 𝕜
lemma normed_algebra.norm_one : ∥(1:𝕜')∥ = 1 :=
by simpa using (norm_algebra_map_eq 𝕜' (1:𝕜))
lemma normed_algebra.norm_one_class : norm_one_class 𝕜' :=
⟨normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜 𝕜'⟩
lemma normed_algebra.zero_ne_one : (0:𝕜') ≠ 1 :=
begin
refine (norm_pos_iff.mp _).symm,
rw normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜 𝕜', norm_num,
end
lemma normed_algebra.nontrivial : nontrivial 𝕜' :=
⟨⟨0, 1, normed_algebra.zero_ne_one 𝕜 𝕜'⟩⟩
end normed_algebra
section restrict_scalars
variables (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
(E : Type*) [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜' E]
/-- Warning: This declaration should be used judiciously.
Please consider using `is_scalar_tower` instead.
`𝕜`-normed space structure induced by a `𝕜'`-normed space structure when `𝕜'` is a
normed algebra over `𝕜`. Not registered as an instance as `𝕜'` can not be inferred.
The type synonym `semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E` will be endowed with this instance by default.
-/
def normed_space.restrict_scalars : normed_space 𝕜 E :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ begin
change ∥(algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' c) • x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
simp [norm_smul]
end,
..restrict_scalars.semimodule 𝕜 𝕜' E }
instance {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*} [I : normed_group E] :
normed_group (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance semimodule.restrict_scalars.normed_space_orig {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*}
[normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_group E] [I : normed_space 𝕜' E] :
normed_space 𝕜' (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance : normed_space 𝕜 (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) :=
(normed_space.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E : normed_space 𝕜 E)
end restrict_scalars
section summable
open_locale classical
open finset filter
variables [normed_group α] [normed_group β]
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm {f : ι → α} :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ i in s, f i) ↔
∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃s:finset ι, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∥ ∑ i in t, f i ∥ < ε :=
begin
rw [cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing, nhds_basis_ball.forall_iff],
{ simp only [ball_0_eq, set.mem_set_of_eq] },
{ rintros s t hst ⟨s', hs'⟩,
exact ⟨s', λ t' ht', hst $ hs' _ ht'⟩ }
end
lemma summable_iff_vanishing_norm [complete_space α] {f : ι → α} :
summable f ↔ ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃s:finset ι, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∥ ∑ i in t, f i ∥ < ε :=
by rw [summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm]
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) : cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ i in s, f i) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm.2 $ assume ε hε,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := summable_iff_vanishing_norm.1 hg ε hε in
⟨s, assume t ht,
have ∥∑ i in t, g i∥ < ε := hs t ht,
have nn : 0 ≤ ∑ i in t, g i := finset.sum_nonneg (assume a _, le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h a)),
lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_sum_le_of_le t (λ i _, h i)) $
by rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg nn] at this⟩
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥)) :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ a in s, f a) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
/-- If a function `f` is summable in norm, and along some sequence of finsets exhausting the space
its sum is converging to a limit `a`, then this holds along all finsets, i.e., `f` is summable
with sum `a`. -/
lemma has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥))
{s : γ → finset ι} {p : filter γ} [ne_bot p]
(hs : tendsto s p at_top) {a : α} (ha : tendsto (λ b, ∑ i in s b, f i) p (𝓝 a)) :
has_sum f a :=
tendsto_nhds_of_cauchy_seq_of_subseq (cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm hf) hs ha
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm {f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : summable (λi, ∥f i∥)) :
has_sum f a ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, ∑ i in range n, f i) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
⟨λ h, h.tendsto_sum_nat,
λ h, has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable hf tendsto_finset_range h⟩
/-- The direct comparison test for series: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `g`
which is summable, then `f` is summable. -/
lemma summable_of_norm_bounded
[complete_space α] {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g) (h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
summable f :=
by { rw summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, exact cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded g hg h }
lemma has_sum.norm_le_of_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : α} {b : ℝ}
(hf : has_sum f a) (hg : has_sum g b) (h : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
∥a∥ ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hf.norm hg $ λ s, norm_sum_le_of_le _ $ λ i hi, h i
/-- Quantitative result associated to the direct comparison test for series: If `∑' i, g i` is
summable, and for all `i`, `∥f i∥ ≤ g i`, then `∥∑' i, f i∥ ≤ ∑' i, g i`. Note that we do not
assume that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete space. -/
lemma tsum_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (hg : has_sum g a)
(h : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
∥∑' i : ι, f i∥ ≤ a :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ exact hf.has_sum.norm_le_of_bounded hg h },
{ rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf, norm_zero],
exact ge_of_tendsto' hg (λ s, sum_nonneg $ λ i hi, (norm_nonneg _).trans (h i)) }
end
/-- If `∑' i, ∥f i∥` is summable, then `∥∑' i, f i∥ ≤ (∑' i, ∥f i∥)`. Note that we do not assume
that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete space. -/
lemma norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λi, ∥f i∥)) :
∥∑'i, f i∥ ≤ ∑' i, ∥f i∥ :=
tsum_of_norm_bounded hf.has_sum $ λ i, le_rfl
variable [complete_space α]
/-- Variant of the direct comparison test for series: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `g` which is summable, then `f` is summable. -/
lemma summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) : summable f :=
begin
replace h := mem_cofinite.1 h,
refine h.summable_compl_iff.mp _,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded _ (h.summable_compl_iff.mpr hg) _,
rintros ⟨a, h'⟩,
simpa using h'
end
lemma summable_of_nnnorm_bounded {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ≥0) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀i, nnnorm (f i) ≤ g i) : summable f :=
summable_of_norm_bounded (λ i, (g i : ℝ)) (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hg) (λ i, by exact_mod_cast h i)
lemma summable_of_summable_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥)) : summable f :=
summable_of_norm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
lemma summable_of_summable_nnnorm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, nnnorm (f a))) : summable f :=
summable_of_nnnorm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
end summable
|
298dd16697a13c7b83f4b67319f755049ef28c87 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/meta/case_tag_auto.lean | 906fbc88c3d3435f1ae84e3082fdd21134b4d81b | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,721 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jannis Limperg. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jannis Limperg
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.tactic
universes l
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Case tags
Case tags are an internal mechanism used by certain tactics to communicate with
each other. They are generated by the tactics `cases`, `induction` and
`with_cases` ('cases-like tactics'), which generate goals corresponding to the
'cases' of an inductive hypothesis. Each of these goals carries a case tag. They
are consumed by the `case` tactic, which focuses on one of these cases. Their
purpose is twofold:
1. Give intuitive names to case goals. For example, when performing induction on
a natural number, two cases are generated: one tagged with `nat.zero` and
one tagged with `nat.succ`. Users can then focus on e.g. the second goal with
`case succ {...}`.
2. Communicate which new hypotheses were introduced by the cases-like tactic
that generated the goal. For example, when performing induction on a
`list α`, the `cons` case introduces two hypotheses corresponding to the two
arguments of the `cons` constructor. `case` allows users to name these with
`case cons : x xs {...}`. To perform this renaming, `case` needs to know
which hypotheses to rename; this information is contained in the case tag for
the `cons` goal.
## Module contents
This module defines
1. what a case tag is (see `case_tag`);
2. how to render a `case_tag` as a list of names (see `render`);
3. how to parse a `case_tag` from a list of names (see `parse`);
4. how to match a `case_tag` with a sequence of names given by the user
(see `match_tag`).
-/
namespace tactic
namespace interactive
/--
A case tag carries the following information:
1. A list of names identifying the case ('case names'). This is usually a list
of constructor names, one for each case split that was performed. For
example, the sequence of tactics `cases n; cases xs`, where `n` is a natural
number and `xs` is a list, will generate four cases tagged as follows:
```
nat.zero, list.nil
nat.zero, list.cons
nat.succ, list.nil
nat.succ, list.cons
```
Note: In the case tag, the case names are stored in reverse order. Thus, the
case names of the first case tag would be `list.nil, nat.zero`. This is
because when printing a goal tag (as part of a goal state), Lean prints all
non-internal names in reverse order.
2. Information about the arguments introduced by the cases-like tactic.
Different tactics work slightly different in this regard:
1. The `with_cases` tactic generates goals where the target quantifies over
any added hypotheses. For example, `with_cases { cases xs }`, where `xs`
is a `list α`, will generate a target of the form `α → list α → ...` in
the `cons` case, where the two arguments correspond to the two arguments
of the `cons` constructor. Goals of this form are tagged with a `pi` case
tag (since the target is a pi type). In addition to the case names, it
contains a natural number, `num_arguments`, which specifies how many of
the arguments that the target quantifies over were introduced by
`with_cases`.
For example, given `n : ℕ` and `xs : list α`, the fourth goal generated by
`with_cases { cases n; induction xs }` has this form:
```
...
⊢ ℕ → α → ∀ (xs' : list α), P xs' → ...
```
The corresponding case tag is
```
pi [`list.cons, `nat.succ] 4
```
since the first four arguments of the target were introduced by
`with_cases {...}`.
2. The `cases` and `induction` tactics do not add arguments to the target,
but rather introduce them as hypotheses in the local context. Goals of
this form are tagged with a `hyps` case tag. In addition to the case
names, it contains a list of *unique* names of the hypotheses that were
introduced.
For example, given `xs : list α`, the second goal generated by
`induction xs` has this form:
```
...
x : α
xs' : list α
ih_xs' : P xs'
⊢ ...
```
The corresponding goal tag is
```
hyps [`list.cons] [`<x>, `<xs'>, `<ih_xs'>]
```
where ````<h>``` denotes the unique name of a hypothesis `h`.
Note: Many tactics do not preserve the unique names of hypotheses
(particularly those tactics that use `revert`). Therefore, a `hyps` case
tag is only guaranteed to be valid directly after it was generated.
-/
inductive case_tag where
| pi : List name → ℕ → case_tag
| hyps : List name → List name → case_tag
protected def case_tag.repr : case_tag → string := sorry
protected def case_tag.to_string : case_tag → string := sorry
namespace case_tag
protected instance has_repr : has_repr case_tag := has_repr.mk case_tag.repr
protected instance has_to_string : has_to_string case_tag := has_to_string.mk case_tag.to_string
/--
The constructor names associated with a case tag.
-/
/--
Renders a case tag to a goal tag (i.e. a list of names), according to the
following schema:
- A `pi` tag with names `N₀ ... Nₙ` and number of arguments `a` is rendered as
```
[`_case.pi.a, N₀, ..., Nₙ]
```
- A `hyps` tag with names `N₀ ... Nₙ` and argument names `A₀ ... Aₘ` is rendered
as
```
[`_case.hyps, A₀._arg, ..., Aₘ._arg, N₀, ..., Nₙ]
```
-/
/--
Creates a `pi` case tag from an input tag `in_tag`. The `names` of the resulting
tag are the non-internal names in `in_tag` (in the order in which they appear in
`in_tag`). `num_arguments` is the number of arguments of the resulting tag.
-/
/--
Creates a `hyps` case tag from an input tag `in_tag`. The `names` of the
resulting tag are the non-internal names in `in_tag` (in the order in which they
appear in `in_tag`). `arguments` is the list of unique hypothesis names of the
resulting tag.
-/
/--
Parses a case tag from the list of names produced by `render`.
-/
/--
Indicates the result of matching a list of names against the names of a case
tag. See `match_tag`.
-/
inductive match_result where
| exact_match : match_result
| fuzzy_match : match_result
| no_match : match_result
namespace match_result
/--
The 'minimum' of two match results:
- If any of the arguments is `no_match`, the result is `no_match`.
- Otherwise, if any of the arguments is `fuzzy_match`, the result is `fuzzy_match`.
- Otherwise (iff both arguments are `exact_match`), the result is `exact_match`.
-/
def combine : match_result → match_result → match_result := sorry
end Mathlib |
7eee0dac44c95782a814c3e017914fb37cd9070d | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/field_theory/abel_ruffini.lean | a83e4287b59daac663bdb2dfc532333ed19157d5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,262 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning and Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import group_theory.solvable
import field_theory.polynomial_galois_group
import ring_theory.roots_of_unity
/-!
# The Abel-Ruffini Theorem
This file proves one direction of the Abel-Ruffini theorem, namely that if an element is solvable
by radicals, then its minimal polynomial has solvable Galois group.
## Main definitions
* `SBF F E` : the intermediate field of solvable-by-radicals elements
## Main results
* `solvable_gal_of_solvable_by_rad` : the minimal polynomial of an element of `SBF F E` has
solvable Galois group
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open polynomial intermediate_field
section abel_ruffini
variables {F : Type*} [field F] {E : Type*} [field E] [algebra F E]
lemma gal_zero_is_solvable : is_solvable (0 : polynomial F).gal :=
by apply_instance
lemma gal_one_is_solvable : is_solvable (1 : polynomial F).gal :=
by apply_instance
lemma gal_C_is_solvable (x : F) : is_solvable (C x).gal :=
by apply_instance
lemma gal_X_is_solvable : is_solvable (X : polynomial F).gal :=
by apply_instance
lemma gal_X_sub_C_is_solvable (x : F) : is_solvable (X - C x).gal :=
by apply_instance
lemma gal_X_pow_is_solvable (n : ℕ) : is_solvable (X ^ n : polynomial F).gal :=
by apply_instance
lemma gal_mul_is_solvable {p q : polynomial F}
(hp : is_solvable p.gal) (hq : is_solvable q.gal) : is_solvable (p * q).gal :=
solvable_of_solvable_injective (gal.restrict_prod_injective p q)
lemma gal_prod_is_solvable {s : multiset (polynomial F)}
(hs : ∀ p ∈ s, is_solvable (gal p)) : is_solvable s.prod.gal :=
begin
apply multiset.induction_on' s,
{ exact gal_one_is_solvable },
{ intros p t hps hts ht,
rw [multiset.insert_eq_cons, multiset.prod_cons],
exact gal_mul_is_solvable (hs p hps) ht },
end
lemma gal_is_solvable_of_splits {p q : polynomial F}
(hpq : fact (p.splits (algebra_map F q.splitting_field))) (hq : is_solvable q.gal) :
is_solvable p.gal :=
begin
haveI : is_solvable (q.splitting_field ≃ₐ[F] q.splitting_field) := hq,
exact solvable_of_surjective (alg_equiv.restrict_normal_hom_surjective q.splitting_field),
end
lemma gal_is_solvable_tower (p q : polynomial F)
(hpq : p.splits (algebra_map F q.splitting_field))
(hp : is_solvable p.gal)
(hq : is_solvable (q.map (algebra_map F p.splitting_field)).gal) :
is_solvable q.gal :=
begin
let K := p.splitting_field,
let L := q.splitting_field,
haveI : fact (p.splits (algebra_map F L)) := ⟨hpq⟩,
let ϕ : (L ≃ₐ[K] L) ≃* (q.map (algebra_map F K)).gal :=
(is_splitting_field.alg_equiv L (q.map (algebra_map F K))).aut_congr,
have ϕ_inj : function.injective ϕ.to_monoid_hom := ϕ.injective,
haveI : is_solvable (K ≃ₐ[F] K) := hp,
haveI : is_solvable (L ≃ₐ[K] L) := solvable_of_solvable_injective ϕ_inj,
exact is_solvable_of_is_scalar_tower F p.splitting_field q.splitting_field,
end
section gal_X_pow_sub_C
lemma gal_X_pow_sub_one_is_solvable (n : ℕ) : is_solvable (X ^ n - 1 : polynomial F).gal :=
begin
by_cases hn : n = 0,
{ rw [hn, pow_zero, sub_self],
exact gal_zero_is_solvable },
have hn' : 0 < n := pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn,
have hn'' : (X ^ n - 1 : polynomial F) ≠ 0 :=
λ h, one_ne_zero ((leading_coeff_X_pow_sub_one hn').symm.trans (congr_arg leading_coeff h)),
apply is_solvable_of_comm,
intros σ τ,
ext a ha,
rw [mem_root_set hn'', alg_hom.map_sub, aeval_X_pow, aeval_one, sub_eq_zero] at ha,
have key : ∀ σ : (X ^ n - 1 : polynomial F).gal, ∃ m : ℕ, σ a = a ^ m,
{ intro σ,
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := σ.to_alg_hom.to_ring_hom.map_root_of_unity_eq_pow_self
⟨is_unit.unit (is_unit_of_pow_eq_one a n ha hn'),
by { ext, rwa [units.coe_pow, is_unit.unit_spec, subtype.coe_mk n hn'] }⟩,
use m,
convert hm,
all_goals { exact (is_unit.unit_spec _).symm } },
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := key σ,
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := key τ,
rw [σ.mul_apply, τ.mul_apply, hc, τ.map_pow, hd, σ.map_pow, hc, ←pow_mul, pow_mul'],
end
lemma gal_X_pow_sub_C_is_solvable_aux (n : ℕ) (a : F)
(h : (X ^ n - 1 : polynomial F).splits (ring_hom.id F)) : is_solvable (X ^ n - C a).gal :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ rw [ha, C_0, sub_zero],
exact gal_X_pow_is_solvable n },
have ha' : algebra_map F (X ^ n - C a).splitting_field a ≠ 0 :=
mt ((ring_hom.injective_iff _).mp (ring_hom.injective _) a) ha,
by_cases hn : n = 0,
{ rw [hn, pow_zero, ←C_1, ←C_sub],
exact gal_C_is_solvable (1 - a) },
have hn' : 0 < n := pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn,
have hn'' : X ^ n - C a ≠ 0 :=
λ h, one_ne_zero ((leading_coeff_X_pow_sub_C hn').symm.trans (congr_arg leading_coeff h)),
have hn''' : (X ^ n - 1 : polynomial F) ≠ 0 :=
λ h, one_ne_zero ((leading_coeff_X_pow_sub_one hn').symm.trans (congr_arg leading_coeff h)),
have mem_range : ∀ {c}, c ^ n = 1 → ∃ d, algebra_map F (X ^ n - C a).splitting_field d = c :=
λ c hc, ring_hom.mem_range.mp (minpoly.mem_range_of_degree_eq_one F c (or.resolve_left h hn'''
(minpoly.irreducible ((splitting_field.normal (X ^ n - C a)).is_integral c)) (minpoly.dvd F c
(by rwa [map_id, alg_hom.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, aeval_X_pow, aeval_one])))),
apply is_solvable_of_comm,
intros σ τ,
ext b hb,
rw [mem_root_set hn'', alg_hom.map_sub, aeval_X_pow, aeval_C, sub_eq_zero] at hb,
have hb' : b ≠ 0,
{ intro hb',
rw [hb', zero_pow hn'] at hb,
exact ha' hb.symm },
have key : ∀ σ : (X ^ n - C a).gal, ∃ c, σ b = b * algebra_map F _ c,
{ intro σ,
have key : (σ b / b) ^ n = 1 := by rw [div_pow, ←σ.map_pow, hb, σ.commutes, div_self ha'],
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := mem_range key,
use c,
rw [hc, mul_div_cancel' (σ b) hb'] },
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := key σ,
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := key τ,
rw [σ.mul_apply, τ.mul_apply, hc, τ.map_mul, τ.commutes, hd, σ.map_mul, σ.commutes, hc],
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_right_inj' hb', mul_comm],
end
lemma splits_X_pow_sub_one_of_X_pow_sub_C {F : Type*} [field F] {E : Type*} [field E]
(i : F →+* E) (n : ℕ) {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : (X ^ n - C a).splits i) : (X ^ n - 1).splits i :=
begin
have ha' : i a ≠ 0 := mt (i.injective_iff.mp (i.injective) a) ha,
by_cases hn : n = 0,
{ rw [hn, pow_zero, sub_self],
exact splits_zero i },
have hn' : 0 < n := pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn,
have hn'' : (X ^ n - C a).degree ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_eq_of_ne (degree_X_pow_sub_C hn' a) (mt with_bot.coe_eq_coe.mp hn),
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_root_of_splits i h hn'',
rw [eval₂_sub, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_C, sub_eq_zero] at hb,
have hb' : b ≠ 0,
{ intro hb',
rw [hb', zero_pow hn'] at hb,
exact ha' hb.symm },
let s := ((X ^ n - C a).map i).roots,
have hs : _ = _ * (s.map _).prod := eq_prod_roots_of_splits h,
rw [leading_coeff_X_pow_sub_C hn', ring_hom.map_one, C_1, one_mul] at hs,
have hs' : s.card = n := (nat_degree_eq_card_roots h).symm.trans nat_degree_X_pow_sub_C,
apply @splits_of_exists_multiset F E _ _ i (X ^ n - 1) (s.map (λ c : E, c / b)),
rw [leading_coeff_X_pow_sub_one hn', ring_hom.map_one, C_1, one_mul, multiset.map_map],
have C_mul_C : (C (i a⁻¹)) * (C (i a)) = 1,
{ rw [←C_mul, ←i.map_mul, inv_mul_cancel ha, i.map_one, C_1] },
have key1 : (X ^ n - 1).map i = C (i a⁻¹) * ((X ^ n - C a).map i).comp (C b * X),
{ rw [map_sub, map_sub, map_pow, map_X, map_C, map_one, sub_comp, pow_comp, X_comp, C_comp,
mul_pow, ←C_pow, hb, mul_sub, ←mul_assoc, C_mul_C, one_mul] },
have key2 : (λ q : polynomial E, q.comp (C b * X)) ∘ (λ c : E, X - C c) =
(λ c : E, C b * (X - C (c / b))),
{ ext1 c,
change (X - C c).comp (C b * X) = C b * (X - C (c / b)),
rw [sub_comp, X_comp, C_comp, mul_sub, ←C_mul, mul_div_cancel' c hb'] },
rw [key1, hs, prod_comp, multiset.map_map, key2, multiset.prod_map_mul, multiset.map_const,
multiset.prod_repeat, hs', ←C_pow, hb, ←mul_assoc, C_mul_C, one_mul],
all_goals { exact field.to_nontrivial F },
end
lemma gal_X_pow_sub_C_is_solvable (n : ℕ) (x : F) : is_solvable (X ^ n - C x).gal :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ rw [hx, C_0, sub_zero],
exact gal_X_pow_is_solvable n },
apply gal_is_solvable_tower (X ^ n - 1) (X ^ n - C x),
{ exact splits_X_pow_sub_one_of_X_pow_sub_C _ n hx (splitting_field.splits _) },
{ exact gal_X_pow_sub_one_is_solvable n },
{ rw [map_sub, map_pow, map_X, map_C],
apply gal_X_pow_sub_C_is_solvable_aux,
have key := splitting_field.splits (X ^ n - 1 : polynomial F),
rwa [←splits_id_iff_splits, map_sub, map_pow, map_X, map_one] at key },
end
end gal_X_pow_sub_C
variables (F)
/-- Inductive definition of solvable by radicals -/
inductive is_solvable_by_rad : E → Prop
| base (a : F) : is_solvable_by_rad (algebra_map F E a)
| add (a b : E) : is_solvable_by_rad a → is_solvable_by_rad b → is_solvable_by_rad (a + b)
| neg (α : E) : is_solvable_by_rad α → is_solvable_by_rad (-α)
| mul (α β : E) : is_solvable_by_rad α → is_solvable_by_rad β → is_solvable_by_rad (α * β)
| inv (α : E) : is_solvable_by_rad α → is_solvable_by_rad α⁻¹
| rad (α : E) (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : is_solvable_by_rad (α^n) → is_solvable_by_rad α
variables (E)
/-- The intermediate field of solvable-by-radicals elements -/
def solvable_by_rad : intermediate_field F E :=
{ carrier := is_solvable_by_rad F,
zero_mem' := by { convert is_solvable_by_rad.base (0 : F), rw ring_hom.map_zero },
add_mem' := is_solvable_by_rad.add,
neg_mem' := is_solvable_by_rad.neg,
one_mem' := by { convert is_solvable_by_rad.base (1 : F), rw ring_hom.map_one },
mul_mem' := is_solvable_by_rad.mul,
inv_mem' := is_solvable_by_rad.inv,
algebra_map_mem' := is_solvable_by_rad.base }
namespace solvable_by_rad
variables {F} {E} {α : E}
lemma induction (P : solvable_by_rad F E → Prop)
(base : ∀ α : F, P (algebra_map F (solvable_by_rad F E) α))
(add : ∀ α β : solvable_by_rad F E, P α → P β → P (α + β))
(neg : ∀ α : solvable_by_rad F E, P α → P (-α))
(mul : ∀ α β : solvable_by_rad F E, P α → P β → P (α * β))
(inv : ∀ α : solvable_by_rad F E, P α → P α⁻¹)
(rad : ∀ α : solvable_by_rad F E, ∀ n : ℕ, n ≠ 0 → P (α^n) → P α)
(α : solvable_by_rad F E) : P α :=
begin
revert α,
suffices : ∀ (α : E), is_solvable_by_rad F α → (∃ β : solvable_by_rad F E, ↑β = α ∧ P β),
{ intro α,
obtain ⟨α₀, hα₀, Pα⟩ := this α (subtype.mem α),
convert Pα,
exact subtype.ext hα₀.symm },
apply is_solvable_by_rad.rec,
{ exact λ α, ⟨algebra_map F (solvable_by_rad F E) α, rfl, base α⟩ },
{ intros α β hα hβ Pα Pβ,
obtain ⟨⟨α₀, hα₀, Pα⟩, β₀, hβ₀, Pβ⟩ := ⟨Pα, Pβ⟩,
exact ⟨α₀ + β₀, by {rw [←hα₀, ←hβ₀], refl }, add α₀ β₀ Pα Pβ⟩ },
{ intros α hα Pα,
obtain ⟨α₀, hα₀, Pα⟩ := Pα,
exact ⟨-α₀, by {rw ←hα₀, refl }, neg α₀ Pα⟩ },
{ intros α β hα hβ Pα Pβ,
obtain ⟨⟨α₀, hα₀, Pα⟩, β₀, hβ₀, Pβ⟩ := ⟨Pα, Pβ⟩,
exact ⟨α₀ * β₀, by {rw [←hα₀, ←hβ₀], refl }, mul α₀ β₀ Pα Pβ⟩ },
{ intros α hα Pα,
obtain ⟨α₀, hα₀, Pα⟩ := Pα,
exact ⟨α₀⁻¹, by {rw ←hα₀, refl }, inv α₀ Pα⟩ },
{ intros α n hn hα Pα,
obtain ⟨α₀, hα₀, Pα⟩ := Pα,
refine ⟨⟨α, is_solvable_by_rad.rad α n hn hα⟩, rfl, rad _ n hn _⟩,
convert Pα,
exact subtype.ext (eq.trans ((solvable_by_rad F E).coe_pow _ n) hα₀.symm) }
end
theorem is_integral (α : solvable_by_rad F E) : is_integral F α :=
begin
revert α,
apply solvable_by_rad.induction,
{ exact λ _, is_integral_algebra_map },
{ exact λ _ _, is_integral_add },
{ exact λ _, is_integral_neg },
{ exact λ _ _, is_integral_mul },
{ exact λ α hα, subalgebra.inv_mem_of_algebraic (integral_closure F (solvable_by_rad F E))
(show is_algebraic F ↑(⟨α, hα⟩ : integral_closure F (solvable_by_rad F E)),
by exact (is_algebraic_iff_is_integral F).mpr hα) },
{ intros α n hn hα,
obtain ⟨p, h1, h2⟩ := (is_algebraic_iff_is_integral F).mpr hα,
refine (is_algebraic_iff_is_integral F).mp ⟨p.comp (X ^ n),
⟨λ h, h1 (leading_coeff_eq_zero.mp _), by rw [aeval_comp, aeval_X_pow, h2]⟩⟩,
rwa [←leading_coeff_eq_zero, leading_coeff_comp, leading_coeff_X_pow, one_pow, mul_one] at h,
rwa nat_degree_X_pow }
end
/-- The statement to be proved inductively -/
def P (α : solvable_by_rad F E) : Prop := is_solvable (minpoly F α).gal
/-- An auxiliary induction lemma, which is generalized by `solvable_by_rad.is_solvable`. -/
lemma induction3 {α : solvable_by_rad F E} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hα : P (α ^ n)) : P α :=
begin
let p := minpoly F (α ^ n),
have hp : p.comp (X ^ n) ≠ 0,
{ intro h,
cases (comp_eq_zero_iff.mp h) with h' h',
{ exact minpoly.ne_zero (is_integral (α ^ n)) h' },
{ exact hn (by rw [←nat_degree_C _, ←h'.2, nat_degree_X_pow]) } },
apply gal_is_solvable_of_splits,
{ exact ⟨splits_of_splits_of_dvd _ hp (splitting_field.splits (p.comp (X ^ n)))
(minpoly.dvd F α (by rw [aeval_comp, aeval_X_pow, minpoly.aeval]))⟩ },
{ refine gal_is_solvable_tower p (p.comp (X ^ n)) _ hα _,
{ exact gal.splits_in_splitting_field_of_comp _ _ (by rwa [nat_degree_X_pow]) },
{ obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_multiset_of_splits _ (splitting_field.splits p),
rw [map_comp, map_pow, map_X, hs, mul_comp, C_comp],
apply gal_mul_is_solvable (gal_C_is_solvable _),
rw prod_comp,
apply gal_prod_is_solvable,
intros q hq,
rw multiset.mem_map at hq,
obtain ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩ := hq,
rw multiset.mem_map at hq,
obtain ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩ := hq,
rw [sub_comp, X_comp, C_comp],
exact gal_X_pow_sub_C_is_solvable n q } },
end
/-- An auxiliary induction lemma, which is generalized by `solvable_by_rad.is_solvable`. -/
lemma induction2 {α β γ : solvable_by_rad F E} (hγ : γ ∈ F⟮α, β⟯) (hα : P α) (hβ : P β) : P γ :=
begin
let p := (minpoly F α),
let q := (minpoly F β),
have hpq := polynomial.splits_of_splits_mul _ (mul_ne_zero (minpoly.ne_zero (is_integral α))
(minpoly.ne_zero (is_integral β))) (splitting_field.splits (p * q)),
let f : F⟮α, β⟯ →ₐ[F] (p * q).splitting_field := classical.choice (alg_hom_mk_adjoin_splits
begin
intros x hx,
cases hx,
rw hx,
exact ⟨is_integral α, hpq.1⟩,
cases hx,
exact ⟨is_integral β, hpq.2⟩,
end),
have key : minpoly F γ = minpoly F (f ⟨γ, hγ⟩) := minpoly.unique'
(minpoly.irreducible (is_integral γ)) begin
suffices : aeval (⟨γ, hγ⟩ : F ⟮α, β⟯) (minpoly F γ) = 0,
{ rw [aeval_alg_hom_apply, this, alg_hom.map_zero] },
apply (algebra_map F⟮α, β⟯ (solvable_by_rad F E)).injective,
rw [ring_hom.map_zero, is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_aeval],
exact minpoly.aeval F γ,
end (minpoly.monic (is_integral γ)),
rw [P, key],
exact gal_is_solvable_of_splits ⟨normal.splits (splitting_field.normal _) _⟩
(gal_mul_is_solvable hα hβ),
end
/-- An auxiliary induction lemma, which is generalized by `solvable_by_rad.is_solvable`. -/
lemma induction1 {α β : solvable_by_rad F E} (hβ : β ∈ F⟮α⟯) (hα : P α) : P β :=
induction2 (adjoin.mono F _ _ (ge_of_eq (set.pair_eq_singleton α)) hβ) hα hα
theorem is_solvable (α : solvable_by_rad F E) :
is_solvable (minpoly F α).gal :=
begin
revert α,
apply solvable_by_rad.induction,
{ exact λ α, by { rw minpoly.eq_X_sub_C, exact gal_X_sub_C_is_solvable α } },
{ exact λ α β, induction2 (add_mem _ (subset_adjoin F _ (set.mem_insert α _))
(subset_adjoin F _ (set.mem_insert_of_mem α (set.mem_singleton β)))) },
{ exact λ α, induction1 (neg_mem _ (mem_adjoin_simple_self F α)) },
{ exact λ α β, induction2 (mul_mem _ (subset_adjoin F _ (set.mem_insert α _))
(subset_adjoin F _ (set.mem_insert_of_mem α (set.mem_singleton β)))) },
{ exact λ α, induction1 (inv_mem _ (mem_adjoin_simple_self F α)) },
{ exact λ α n, induction3 },
end
/-- An irreducible polynomial with an `is_solvable_by_rad` root has solvable Galois group -/
lemma is_solvable' {α : E} {q : polynomial F} (q_irred : irreducible q)
(q_aeval : aeval α q = 0) (hα : is_solvable_by_rad F α) :
_root_.is_solvable q.gal :=
begin
haveI : _root_.is_solvable (q * C q.leading_coeff⁻¹).gal := by
{ rw [minpoly.unique'' q_irred q_aeval,
←show minpoly F (⟨α, hα⟩ : solvable_by_rad F E) = minpoly F α,
from minpoly.eq_of_algebra_map_eq (ring_hom.injective _) (is_integral ⟨α, hα⟩) rfl],
exact is_solvable ⟨α, hα⟩ },
refine solvable_of_surjective (gal.restrict_dvd_surjective ⟨C q.leading_coeff⁻¹, rfl⟩ _),
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff, ne, ne, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero],
exact ⟨q_irred.ne_zero, leading_coeff_ne_zero.mpr q_irred.ne_zero⟩,
end
end solvable_by_rad
end abel_ruffini
|
bf8152b83072ad96082bd070087c548631d6dbc9 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/ring_theory/integral_closure.lean | b02f24b3844696408bf5449f9fa216ba381caac7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 43,009 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import data.polynomial.expand
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import linear_algebra.matrix.determinant
import ring_theory.adjoin.fg
import ring_theory.polynomial.scale_roots
import ring_theory.polynomial.tower
import ring_theory.tensor_product
/-!
# Integral closure of a subring.
If A is an R-algebra then `a : A` is integral over R if it is a root of a monic polynomial
with coefficients in R. Enough theory is developed to prove that integral elements
form a sub-R-algebra of A.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a `comm_ring` and let `A` be an R-algebra.
* `ring_hom.is_integral_elem (f : R →+* A) (x : A)` : `x` is integral with respect to the map `f`,
* `is_integral (x : A)` : `x` is integral over `R`, i.e., is a root of a monic polynomial with
coefficients in `R`.
* `integral_closure R A` : the integral closure of `R` in `A`, regarded as a sub-`R`-algebra of `A`.
-/
open_locale classical
open_locale big_operators polynomial
open polynomial submodule
section ring
variables {R S A : Type*}
variables [comm_ring R] [ring A] [ring S] (f : R →+* S)
/-- An element `x` of `A` is said to be integral over `R` with respect to `f`
if it is a root of a monic polynomial `p : R[X]` evaluated under `f` -/
def ring_hom.is_integral_elem (f : R →+* A) (x : A) :=
∃ p : R[X], monic p ∧ eval₂ f x p = 0
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : R →+* A` is said to be integral
if every element `A` is integral with respect to the map `f` -/
def ring_hom.is_integral (f : R →+* A) :=
∀ x : A, f.is_integral_elem x
variables [algebra R A] (R)
/-- An element `x` of an algebra `A` over a commutative ring `R` is said to be *integral*,
if it is a root of some monic polynomial `p : R[X]`.
Equivalently, the element is integral over `R` with respect to the induced `algebra_map` -/
def is_integral (x : A) : Prop :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_elem x
variable (A)
/-- An algebra is integral if every element of the extension is integral over the base ring -/
def algebra.is_integral : Prop :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral
variables {R A}
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_map {x : R} : f.is_integral_elem (f x) :=
⟨X - C x, monic_X_sub_C _, by simp⟩
theorem is_integral_algebra_map {x : R} : is_integral R (algebra_map R A x) :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_map
theorem is_integral_of_noetherian (H : is_noetherian R A) (x : A) :
is_integral R x :=
begin
let leval : (R[X] →ₗ[R] A) := (aeval x).to_linear_map,
let D : ℕ → submodule R A := λ n, (degree_le R n).map leval,
let M := well_founded.min (is_noetherian_iff_well_founded.1 H)
(set.range D) ⟨_, ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩,
have HM : M ∈ set.range D := well_founded.min_mem _ _ _,
cases HM with N HN,
have HM : ¬M < D (N+1) := well_founded.not_lt_min
(is_noetherian_iff_well_founded.1 H) (set.range D) _ ⟨N+1, rfl⟩,
rw ← HN at HM,
have HN2 : D (N+1) ≤ D N := classical.by_contradiction (λ H, HM
(lt_of_le_not_le (map_mono (degree_le_mono
(with_bot.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_succ N)))) H)),
have HN3 : leval (X^(N+1)) ∈ D N,
{ exact HN2 (mem_map_of_mem (mem_degree_le.2 (degree_X_pow_le _))) },
rcases HN3 with ⟨p, hdp, hpe⟩,
refine ⟨X^(N+1) - p, monic_X_pow_sub (mem_degree_le.1 hdp), _⟩,
show leval (X ^ (N + 1) - p) = 0,
rw [linear_map.map_sub, hpe, sub_self]
end
theorem is_integral_of_submodule_noetherian (S : subalgebra R A)
(H : is_noetherian R S.to_submodule) (x : A) (hx : x ∈ S) :
is_integral R x :=
begin
suffices : is_integral R (show S, from ⟨x, hx⟩),
{ rcases this with ⟨p, hpm, hpx⟩,
replace hpx := congr_arg S.val hpx,
refine ⟨p, hpm, eq.trans _ hpx⟩,
simp only [aeval_def, eval₂, sum_def],
rw S.val.map_sum,
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ n hn, _),
rw [S.val.map_mul, S.val.map_pow, S.val.commutes, S.val_apply, subtype.coe_mk], },
refine is_integral_of_noetherian H ⟨x, hx⟩
end
end ring
section
variables {R A B S : Type*}
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A] [comm_ring B] [comm_ring S]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : R →+* S)
theorem is_integral_alg_hom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) {x : A} (hx : is_integral R x) : is_integral R (f x) :=
let ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩ :=
hx in ⟨p, hp, by rw [← aeval_def, aeval_alg_hom_apply, aeval_def, hpx, f.map_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem is_integral_alg_equiv (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) {x : A} : is_integral R (f x) ↔ is_integral R x :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using is_integral_alg_hom f.symm.to_alg_hom h, is_integral_alg_hom f.to_alg_hom⟩
theorem is_integral_of_is_scalar_tower [algebra A B] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
(x : B) (hx : is_integral R x) : is_integral A x :=
let ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩ := hx in
⟨p.map $ algebra_map R A, hp.map _,
by rw [← aeval_def, ← is_scalar_tower.aeval_apply, aeval_def, hpx]⟩
theorem is_integral_of_subring {x : A} (T : subring R)
(hx : is_integral T x) : is_integral R x :=
is_integral_of_is_scalar_tower x hx
lemma is_integral.algebra_map [algebra A B] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
{x : A} (h : is_integral R x) :
is_integral R (algebra_map A B x) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨f, hf, hx⟩,
use [f, hf],
rw [is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq R A B, ← hom_eval₂, hx, ring_hom.map_zero]
end
lemma is_integral_algebra_map_iff [algebra A B] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
{x : A} (hAB : function.injective (algebra_map A B)) :
is_integral R (algebra_map A B x) ↔ is_integral R x :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, h.algebra_map⟩,
rintros ⟨f, hf, hx⟩,
use [f, hf],
exact is_scalar_tower.aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_algebra_map_eq_zero R A B hAB hx,
end
theorem is_integral_iff_is_integral_closure_finite {r : A} :
is_integral R r ↔ ∃ s : set R, s.finite ∧ is_integral (subring.closure s) r :=
begin
split; intro hr,
{ rcases hr with ⟨p, hmp, hpr⟩,
refine ⟨_, finset.finite_to_set _, p.restriction, monic_restriction.2 hmp, _⟩,
erw [← aeval_def, is_scalar_tower.aeval_apply _ R, map_restriction, aeval_def, hpr] },
rcases hr with ⟨s, hs, hsr⟩,
exact is_integral_of_subring _ hsr
end
theorem fg_adjoin_singleton_of_integral (x : A) (hx : is_integral R x) :
(algebra.adjoin R ({x} : set A)).to_submodule.fg :=
begin
rcases hx with ⟨f, hfm, hfx⟩,
existsi finset.image ((^) x) (finset.range (nat_degree f + 1)),
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw span_le, intros s hs, rw finset.mem_coe at hs,
rcases finset.mem_image.1 hs with ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩, clear hk,
exact (algebra.adjoin R {x}).pow_mem (algebra.subset_adjoin (set.mem_singleton _)) k },
intros r hr, change r ∈ algebra.adjoin R ({x} : set A) at hr,
rw algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval at hr,
rcases (aeval x).mem_range.mp hr with ⟨p, rfl⟩,
rw ← mod_by_monic_add_div p hfm,
rw ← aeval_def at hfx,
rw [alg_hom.map_add, alg_hom.map_mul, hfx, zero_mul, add_zero],
have : degree (p %ₘ f) ≤ degree f := degree_mod_by_monic_le p hfm,
generalize_hyp : p %ₘ f = q at this ⊢,
rw [← sum_C_mul_X_eq q, aeval_def, eval₂_sum, sum_def],
refine sum_mem (λ k hkq, _),
rw [eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_pow, eval₂_X, ← algebra.smul_def],
refine smul_mem _ _ (subset_span _),
rw finset.mem_coe, refine finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, _, rfl⟩,
rw [finset.mem_range, nat.lt_succ_iff], refine le_of_not_lt (λ hk, _),
rw [degree_le_iff_coeff_zero] at this,
rw [mem_support_iff] at hkq, apply hkq, apply this,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_nat_degree (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.2 hk)
end
theorem fg_adjoin_of_finite {s : set A} (hfs : s.finite)
(his : ∀ x ∈ s, is_integral R x) : (algebra.adjoin R s).to_submodule.fg :=
set.finite.induction_on hfs (λ _, ⟨{1}, submodule.ext $ λ x,
by { erw [algebra.adjoin_empty, finset.coe_singleton, ← one_eq_span, one_eq_range,
linear_map.mem_range, algebra.mem_bot], refl }⟩)
(λ a s has hs ih his, by rw [← set.union_singleton, algebra.adjoin_union_coe_submodule]; exact
fg.mul (ih $ λ i hi, his i $ set.mem_insert_of_mem a hi)
(fg_adjoin_singleton_of_integral _ $ his a $ set.mem_insert a s)) his
lemma is_noetherian_adjoin_finset [is_noetherian_ring R] (s : finset A)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, is_integral R x) :
is_noetherian R (algebra.adjoin R (↑s : set A)) :=
is_noetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian _ (fg_adjoin_of_finite s.finite_to_set hs)
/-- If `S` is a sub-`R`-algebra of `A` and `S` is finitely-generated as an `R`-module,
then all elements of `S` are integral over `R`. -/
theorem is_integral_of_mem_of_fg (S : subalgebra R A)
(HS : S.to_submodule.fg) (x : A) (hx : x ∈ S) : is_integral R x :=
begin
-- say `x ∈ S`. We want to prove that `x` is integral over `R`.
-- Say `S` is generated as an `R`-module by the set `y`.
cases HS with y hy,
-- We can write `x` as `∑ rᵢ yᵢ` for `yᵢ ∈ Y`.
obtain ⟨lx, hlx1, hlx2⟩ :
∃ (l : A →₀ R) (H : l ∈ finsupp.supported R R ↑y), (finsupp.total A A R id) l = x,
{ rwa [←(@finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total A A R _ _ _ id ↑y x), set.image_id ↑y, hy] },
-- Note that `y ⊆ S`.
have hyS : ∀ {p}, p ∈ y → p ∈ S := λ p hp, show p ∈ S.to_submodule,
by { rw ← hy, exact subset_span hp },
-- Now `S` is a subalgebra so the product of two elements of `y` is also in `S`.
have : ∀ (jk : (↑(y ×ˢ y) : set (A × A))), jk.1.1 * jk.1.2 ∈ S.to_submodule :=
λ jk, S.mul_mem (hyS (finset.mem_product.1 jk.2).1) (hyS (finset.mem_product.1 jk.2).2),
rw [← hy, ← set.image_id ↑y] at this, simp only [finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total] at this,
-- Say `yᵢyⱼ = ∑rᵢⱼₖ yₖ`
choose ly hly1 hly2,
-- Now let `S₀` be the subring of `R` generated by the `rᵢ` and the `rᵢⱼₖ`.
let S₀ : subring R :=
subring.closure ↑(lx.frange ∪ finset.bUnion finset.univ (finsupp.frange ∘ ly)),
-- It suffices to prove that `x` is integral over `S₀`.
refine is_integral_of_subring S₀ _,
letI : comm_ring S₀ := subring_class.to_comm_ring S₀,
letI : algebra S₀ A := algebra.of_subring S₀,
-- Claim: the `S₀`-module span (in `A`) of the set `y ∪ {1}` is closed under
-- multiplication (indeed, this is the motivation for the definition of `S₀`).
have :
span S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A) * span S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A) ≤ span S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A),
{ rw span_mul_span, refine span_le.2 (λ z hz, _),
rcases set.mem_mul.1 hz with ⟨p, q, rfl | hp, hq, rfl⟩,
{ rw one_mul, exact subset_span hq },
rcases hq with rfl | hq,
{ rw mul_one, exact subset_span (or.inr hp) },
erw ← hly2 ⟨(p, q), finset.mem_product.2 ⟨hp, hq⟩⟩,
rw [finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum],
refine (span S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A)).sum_mem (λ t ht, _),
have : ly ⟨(p, q), finset.mem_product.2 ⟨hp, hq⟩⟩ t ∈ S₀ :=
subring.subset_closure (finset.mem_union_right _ $ finset.mem_bUnion.2
⟨⟨(p, q), finset.mem_product.2 ⟨hp, hq⟩⟩, finset.mem_univ _,
finsupp.mem_frange.2 ⟨finsupp.mem_support_iff.1 ht, _, rfl⟩⟩),
change (⟨_, this⟩ : S₀) • t ∈ _, exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span $ or.inr $ hly1 _ ht) },
-- Hence this span is a subring. Call this subring `S₁`.
let S₁ : subring A :=
{ carrier := span S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A),
one_mem' := subset_span $ or.inl rfl,
mul_mem' := λ p q hp hq, this $ mul_mem_mul hp hq,
zero_mem' := (span S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A)).zero_mem,
add_mem' := λ _ _, (span S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A)).add_mem,
neg_mem' := λ _, (span S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A)).neg_mem },
have : S₁ = subalgebra.to_subring (algebra.adjoin S₀ (↑y : set A)),
{ ext z,
suffices : z ∈ span ↥S₀ (insert 1 ↑y : set A) ↔
z ∈ (algebra.adjoin ↥S₀ (y : set A)).to_submodule,
{ simpa },
split; intro hz,
{ exact (span_le.2
(set.insert_subset.2 ⟨(algebra.adjoin S₀ ↑y).one_mem, algebra.subset_adjoin⟩)) hz },
{ rw [subalgebra.mem_to_submodule, algebra.mem_adjoin_iff] at hz,
suffices : subring.closure (set.range ⇑(algebra_map ↥S₀ A) ∪ ↑y) ≤ S₁,
{ exact this hz },
refine subring.closure_le.2 (set.union_subset _ (λ t ht, subset_span $ or.inr ht)),
rw set.range_subset_iff,
intro y,
rw algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one,
exact smul_mem _ y (subset_span (or.inl rfl)) } },
have foo : ∀ z, z ∈ S₁ ↔ z ∈ algebra.adjoin ↥S₀ (y : set A),
simp [this],
haveI : is_noetherian_ring ↥S₀ := is_noetherian_subring_closure _ (finset.finite_to_set _),
refine is_integral_of_submodule_noetherian (algebra.adjoin S₀ ↑y)
(is_noetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian _ ⟨insert 1 y,
by { rw [finset.coe_insert], ext z, simp [S₁], convert foo z}⟩) _ _,
rw [← hlx2, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum], refine subalgebra.sum_mem _ (λ r hr, _),
have : lx r ∈ S₀ :=
subring.subset_closure (finset.mem_union_left _ (finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hr)),
change (⟨_, this⟩ : S₀) • r ∈ _,
rw finsupp.mem_supported at hlx1,
exact subalgebra.smul_mem _ (algebra.subset_adjoin $ hlx1 hr) _
end
variables {f}
lemma ring_hom.finite.to_is_integral (h : f.finite) : f.is_integral :=
by { letI := f.to_algebra, exact λ x, is_integral_of_mem_of_fg ⊤ h.1 _ trivial }
alias ring_hom.finite.to_is_integral ← ring_hom.is_integral.of_finite
lemma ring_hom.is_integral.to_finite (h : f.is_integral) (h' : f.finite_type) : f.finite :=
begin
letI := f.to_algebra,
unfreezingI { obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := h' },
constructor,
change (⊤ : subalgebra R S).to_submodule.fg,
rw ← hs,
exact fg_adjoin_of_finite (set.to_finite _) (λ x _, h x)
end
alias ring_hom.is_integral.to_finite ← ring_hom.finite.of_is_integral_of_finite_type
/-- finite = integral + finite type -/
lemma ring_hom.finite_iff_is_integral_and_finite_type :
f.finite ↔ f.is_integral ∧ f.finite_type :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.to_is_integral, h.to_finite_type⟩, λ ⟨h, h'⟩, h.to_finite h'⟩
lemma algebra.is_integral.finite (h : algebra.is_integral R A) [h' : algebra.finite_type R A] :
module.finite R A :=
begin
have := h.to_finite
(by { delta ring_hom.finite_type, convert h', ext, exact (algebra.smul_def _ _).symm }),
delta ring_hom.finite at this, convert this, ext, exact algebra.smul_def _ _,
end
lemma algebra.is_integral.of_finite [h : module.finite R A] : algebra.is_integral R A :=
begin
apply ring_hom.finite.to_is_integral,
delta ring_hom.finite, convert h, ext, exact (algebra.smul_def _ _).symm,
end
/-- finite = integral + finite type -/
lemma algebra.finite_iff_is_integral_and_finite_type :
module.finite R A ↔ algebra.is_integral R A ∧ algebra.finite_type R A :=
⟨λ h, by exactI ⟨algebra.is_integral.of_finite, infer_instance⟩, λ ⟨h, h'⟩, by exactI h.finite⟩
variables (f)
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_of_mem_closure {x y z : S}
(hx : f.is_integral_elem x) (hy : f.is_integral_elem y)
(hz : z ∈ subring.closure ({x, y} : set S)) :
f.is_integral_elem z :=
begin
letI : algebra R S := f.to_algebra,
have := (fg_adjoin_singleton_of_integral x hx).mul (fg_adjoin_singleton_of_integral y hy),
rw [← algebra.adjoin_union_coe_submodule, set.singleton_union] at this,
exact is_integral_of_mem_of_fg (algebra.adjoin R {x, y}) this z
(algebra.mem_adjoin_iff.2 $ subring.closure_mono (set.subset_union_right _ _) hz),
end
theorem is_integral_of_mem_closure {x y z : A}
(hx : is_integral R x) (hy : is_integral R y)
(hz : z ∈ subring.closure ({x, y} : set A)) :
is_integral R z :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_of_mem_closure hx hy hz
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_zero : f.is_integral_elem 0 :=
f.map_zero ▸ f.is_integral_map
theorem is_integral_zero : is_integral R (0:A) :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_zero
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_one : f.is_integral_elem 1 :=
f.map_one ▸ f.is_integral_map
theorem is_integral_one : is_integral R (1:A) :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_one
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_add {x y : S}
(hx : f.is_integral_elem x) (hy : f.is_integral_elem y) :
f.is_integral_elem (x + y) :=
f.is_integral_of_mem_closure hx hy $ subring.add_mem _
(subring.subset_closure (or.inl rfl)) (subring.subset_closure (or.inr rfl))
theorem is_integral_add {x y : A}
(hx : is_integral R x) (hy : is_integral R y) :
is_integral R (x + y) :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_add hx hy
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_neg {x : S}
(hx : f.is_integral_elem x) : f.is_integral_elem (-x) :=
f.is_integral_of_mem_closure hx hx (subring.neg_mem _ (subring.subset_closure (or.inl rfl)))
theorem is_integral_neg {x : A}
(hx : is_integral R x) : is_integral R (-x) :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_neg hx
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_sub {x y : S}
(hx : f.is_integral_elem x) (hy : f.is_integral_elem y) : f.is_integral_elem (x - y) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.is_integral_add hx (f.is_integral_neg hy)
theorem is_integral_sub {x y : A}
(hx : is_integral R x) (hy : is_integral R y) : is_integral R (x - y) :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_sub hx hy
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_mul {x y : S}
(hx : f.is_integral_elem x) (hy : f.is_integral_elem y) : f.is_integral_elem (x * y) :=
f.is_integral_of_mem_closure hx hy (subring.mul_mem _
(subring.subset_closure (or.inl rfl)) (subring.subset_closure (or.inr rfl)))
theorem is_integral_mul {x y : A}
(hx : is_integral R x) (hy : is_integral R y) : is_integral R (x * y) :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_mul hx hy
lemma is_integral_smul [algebra S A] [algebra R S] [is_scalar_tower R S A] {x : A} (r : R)
(hx : is_integral S x) : is_integral S (r • x) :=
begin
rw [algebra.smul_def, is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply R S A],
exact is_integral_mul is_integral_algebra_map hx,
end
lemma is_integral_of_pow {x : A} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (hx : is_integral R $ x ^ n) :
is_integral R x :=
begin
rcases hx with ⟨p, ⟨hmonic, heval⟩⟩,
exact ⟨expand R n p, monic.expand hn hmonic,
by rwa [eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_expand, expand_eval, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map]⟩
end
variables (R A)
/-- The integral closure of R in an R-algebra A. -/
def integral_closure : subalgebra R A :=
{ carrier := { r | is_integral R r },
zero_mem' := is_integral_zero,
one_mem' := is_integral_one,
add_mem' := λ _ _, is_integral_add,
mul_mem' := λ _ _, is_integral_mul,
algebra_map_mem' := λ x, is_integral_algebra_map }
theorem mem_integral_closure_iff_mem_fg {r : A} :
r ∈ integral_closure R A ↔ ∃ M : subalgebra R A, M.to_submodule.fg ∧ r ∈ M :=
⟨λ hr, ⟨algebra.adjoin R {r}, fg_adjoin_singleton_of_integral _ hr, algebra.subset_adjoin rfl⟩,
λ ⟨M, Hf, hrM⟩, is_integral_of_mem_of_fg M Hf _ hrM⟩
variables {R} {A}
lemma adjoin_le_integral_closure {x : A} (hx : is_integral R x) :
algebra.adjoin R {x} ≤ integral_closure R A :=
begin
rw [algebra.adjoin_le_iff],
simp only [set_like.mem_coe, set.singleton_subset_iff],
exact hx
end
lemma le_integral_closure_iff_is_integral {S : subalgebra R A} :
S ≤ integral_closure R A ↔ algebra.is_integral R S :=
set_like.forall.symm.trans (forall_congr (λ x, show is_integral R (algebra_map S A x)
↔ is_integral R x, from is_integral_algebra_map_iff subtype.coe_injective))
lemma is_integral_sup {S T : subalgebra R A} :
algebra.is_integral R ↥(S ⊔ T) ↔ algebra.is_integral R S ∧ algebra.is_integral R T :=
by simp only [←le_integral_closure_iff_is_integral, sup_le_iff]
/-- Mapping an integral closure along an `alg_equiv` gives the integral closure. -/
lemma integral_closure_map_alg_equiv (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) :
(integral_closure R A).map (f : A →ₐ[R] B) = integral_closure R B :=
begin
ext y,
rw subalgebra.mem_map,
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact is_integral_alg_hom f hx },
{ intro hy,
use [f.symm y, is_integral_alg_hom (f.symm : B →ₐ[R] A) hy],
simp }
end
lemma integral_closure.is_integral (x : integral_closure R A) : is_integral R x :=
let ⟨p, hpm, hpx⟩ := x.2 in ⟨p, hpm, subtype.eq $
by rwa [← aeval_def, subtype.val_eq_coe, ← subalgebra.val_apply, aeval_alg_hom_apply] at hpx⟩
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_of_is_integral_mul_unit (x y : S) (r : R) (hr : f r * y = 1)
(hx : f.is_integral_elem (x * y)) : f.is_integral_elem x :=
begin
obtain ⟨p, ⟨p_monic, hp⟩⟩ := hx,
refine ⟨scale_roots p r, ⟨(monic_scale_roots_iff r).2 p_monic, _⟩⟩,
convert scale_roots_eval₂_eq_zero f hp,
rw [mul_comm x y, ← mul_assoc, hr, one_mul],
end
theorem is_integral_of_is_integral_mul_unit {x y : A} {r : R} (hr : algebra_map R A r * y = 1)
(hx : is_integral R (x * y)) : is_integral R x :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_of_is_integral_mul_unit x y r hr hx
/-- Generalization of `is_integral_of_mem_closure` bootstrapped up from that lemma -/
lemma is_integral_of_mem_closure' (G : set A) (hG : ∀ x ∈ G, is_integral R x) :
∀ x ∈ (subring.closure G), is_integral R x :=
λ x hx, subring.closure_induction hx hG is_integral_zero is_integral_one
(λ _ _, is_integral_add) (λ _, is_integral_neg) (λ _ _, is_integral_mul)
lemma is_integral_of_mem_closure'' {S : Type*} [comm_ring S] {f : R →+* S} (G : set S)
(hG : ∀ x ∈ G, f.is_integral_elem x) : ∀ x ∈ (subring.closure G), f.is_integral_elem x :=
λ x hx, @is_integral_of_mem_closure' R S _ _ f.to_algebra G hG x hx
lemma is_integral.pow {x : A} (h : is_integral R x) (n : ℕ) : is_integral R (x ^ n) :=
(integral_closure R A).pow_mem h n
lemma is_integral.nsmul {x : A} (h : is_integral R x) (n : ℕ) : is_integral R (n • x) :=
(integral_closure R A).nsmul_mem h n
lemma is_integral.zsmul {x : A} (h : is_integral R x) (n : ℤ) : is_integral R (n • x) :=
(integral_closure R A).zsmul_mem h n
lemma is_integral.multiset_prod {s : multiset A} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, is_integral R x) :
is_integral R s.prod :=
(integral_closure R A).multiset_prod_mem h
lemma is_integral.multiset_sum {s : multiset A} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, is_integral R x) :
is_integral R s.sum :=
(integral_closure R A).multiset_sum_mem h
lemma is_integral.prod {α : Type*} {s : finset α} (f : α → A) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, is_integral R (f x)) :
is_integral R (∏ x in s, f x) :=
(integral_closure R A).prod_mem h
lemma is_integral.sum {α : Type*} {s : finset α} (f : α → A) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, is_integral R (f x)) :
is_integral R (∑ x in s, f x) :=
(integral_closure R A).sum_mem h
lemma is_integral.det {n : Type*} [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] {M : matrix n n A}
(h : ∀ i j, is_integral R (M i j)) :
is_integral R M.det :=
begin
rw [matrix.det_apply],
exact is_integral.sum _ (λ σ hσ, is_integral.zsmul (is_integral.prod _ (λ i hi, h _ _)) _)
end
@[simp] lemma is_integral.pow_iff {x : A} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
is_integral R (x ^ n) ↔ is_integral R x :=
⟨is_integral_of_pow hn, λ hx, is_integral.pow hx n⟩
open_locale tensor_product
lemma is_integral.tmul (x : A) {y : B} (h : is_integral R y) : is_integral A (x ⊗ₜ[R] y) :=
begin
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := h,
refine ⟨(p.map (algebra_map R A)).scale_roots x, _, _⟩,
{ rw polynomial.monic_scale_roots_iff, exact hp.map _ },
convert @polynomial.scale_roots_eval₂_mul (A ⊗[R] B) A _ _ _
algebra.tensor_product.include_left.to_ring_hom (1 ⊗ₜ y) x using 2,
{ simp only [alg_hom.to_ring_hom_eq_coe, alg_hom.coe_to_ring_hom, mul_one, one_mul,
algebra.tensor_product.include_left_apply, algebra.tensor_product.tmul_mul_tmul] },
convert (mul_zero _).symm,
rw [polynomial.eval₂_map, algebra.tensor_product.include_left_comp_algebra_map,
← polynomial.eval₂_map],
convert polynomial.eval₂_at_apply algebra.tensor_product.include_right.to_ring_hom y,
rw [polynomial.eval_map, hp', _root_.map_zero],
end
section
variables (p : R[X]) (x : S)
/-- The monic polynomial whose roots are `p.leading_coeff * x` for roots `x` of `p`. -/
noncomputable
def normalize_scale_roots (p : R[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i in p.support, monomial i
(if i = p.nat_degree then 1 else p.coeff i * p.leading_coeff ^ (p.nat_degree - 1 - i))
lemma normalize_scale_roots_coeff_mul_leading_coeff_pow (i : ℕ) (hp : 1 ≤ nat_degree p) :
(normalize_scale_roots p).coeff i * p.leading_coeff ^ i =
p.coeff i * p.leading_coeff ^ (p.nat_degree - 1) :=
begin
simp only [normalize_scale_roots, finset_sum_coeff, coeff_monomial, finset.sum_ite_eq', one_mul,
zero_mul, mem_support_iff, ite_mul, ne.def, ite_not],
split_ifs with h₁ h₂,
{ simp [h₁], },
{ rw [h₂, leading_coeff, ← pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hp], },
{ rw [mul_assoc, ← pow_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le],
apply nat.le_pred_of_lt,
rw lt_iff_le_and_ne,
exact ⟨le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero h₁, h₂⟩, },
end
lemma leading_coeff_smul_normalize_scale_roots (p : R[X]) :
p.leading_coeff • normalize_scale_roots p = scale_roots p p.leading_coeff :=
begin
ext,
simp only [coeff_scale_roots, normalize_scale_roots, coeff_monomial, coeff_smul, finset.smul_sum,
ne.def, finset.sum_ite_eq', finset_sum_coeff, smul_ite, smul_zero, mem_support_iff],
split_ifs with h₁ h₂,
{ simp [*] },
{ simp [*] },
{ rw [algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ', tsub_right_comm,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le],
rw nat.succ_le_iff,
exact tsub_pos_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero h₁) h₂) },
end
lemma normalize_scale_roots_support :
(normalize_scale_roots p).support ≤ p.support :=
begin
intro x,
contrapose,
simp only [not_mem_support_iff, normalize_scale_roots, finset_sum_coeff, coeff_monomial,
finset.sum_ite_eq', mem_support_iff, ne.def, not_not, ite_eq_right_iff],
intros h₁ h₂,
exact (h₂ h₁).rec _,
end
lemma normalize_scale_roots_degree :
(normalize_scale_roots p).degree = p.degree :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ exact finset.sup_mono (normalize_scale_roots_support p) },
{ rw [← degree_scale_roots, ← leading_coeff_smul_normalize_scale_roots],
exact degree_smul_le _ _ }
end
lemma normalize_scale_roots_eval₂_leading_coeff_mul (h : 1 ≤ p.nat_degree) (f : R →+* S) (x : S) :
(normalize_scale_roots p).eval₂ f (f p.leading_coeff * x) =
f p.leading_coeff ^ (p.nat_degree - 1) * (p.eval₂ f x) :=
begin
rw [eval₂_eq_sum_range, eval₂_eq_sum_range, finset.mul_sum],
apply finset.sum_congr,
{ rw nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq (normalize_scale_roots_degree p) },
intros n hn,
rw [mul_pow, ← mul_assoc, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_mul,
normalize_scale_roots_coeff_mul_leading_coeff_pow _ _ h, f.map_mul, f.map_pow],
ring,
end
lemma normalize_scale_roots_monic (h : p ≠ 0) : (normalize_scale_roots p).monic :=
begin
delta monic leading_coeff,
rw nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq (normalize_scale_roots_degree p),
suffices : p = 0 → (0 : R) = 1,
{ simpa [normalize_scale_roots, coeff_monomial] },
exact λ h', (h h').rec _,
end
/-- Given a `p : R[X]` and a `x : S` such that `p.eval₂ f x = 0`,
`f p.leading_coeff * x` is integral. -/
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_elem_leading_coeff_mul (h : p.eval₂ f x = 0) :
f.is_integral_elem (f p.leading_coeff * x) :=
begin
by_cases h' : 1 ≤ p.nat_degree,
{ use normalize_scale_roots p,
have : p ≠ 0 := λ h'', by { rw [h'', nat_degree_zero] at h', exact nat.not_succ_le_zero 0 h' },
use normalize_scale_roots_monic p this,
rw [normalize_scale_roots_eval₂_leading_coeff_mul p h' f x, h, mul_zero] },
{ by_cases hp : p.map f = 0,
{ apply_fun (λ q, coeff q p.nat_degree) at hp,
rw [coeff_map, coeff_zero, coeff_nat_degree] at hp,
rw [hp, zero_mul],
exact f.is_integral_zero },
{ rw [nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not] at h',
rw [eq_C_of_nat_degree_eq_zero h', eval₂_C] at h,
suffices : p.map f = 0,
{ exact (hp this).rec _ },
rw [eq_C_of_nat_degree_eq_zero h', map_C, h, C_eq_zero] } }
end
/-- Given a `p : R[X]` and a root `x : S`,
then `p.leading_coeff • x : S` is integral over `R`. -/
lemma is_integral_leading_coeff_smul [algebra R S] (h : aeval x p = 0) :
is_integral R (p.leading_coeff • x) :=
begin
rw aeval_def at h,
rw algebra.smul_def,
exact (algebra_map R S).is_integral_elem_leading_coeff_mul p x h,
end
end
end
section is_integral_closure
/-- `is_integral_closure A R B` is the characteristic predicate stating `A` is
the integral closure of `R` in `B`,
i.e. that an element of `B` is integral over `R` iff it is an element of (the image of) `A`.
-/
class is_integral_closure (A R B : Type*) [comm_ring R] [comm_semiring A] [comm_ring B]
[algebra R B] [algebra A B] : Prop :=
(algebra_map_injective [] : function.injective (algebra_map A B))
(is_integral_iff : ∀ {x : B}, is_integral R x ↔ ∃ y, algebra_map A B y = x)
instance integral_closure.is_integral_closure (R A : Type*) [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A]
[algebra R A] : is_integral_closure (integral_closure R A) R A :=
⟨subtype.coe_injective, λ x, ⟨λ h, ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩, by { rintro ⟨⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, exact h }⟩⟩
namespace is_integral_closure
variables {R A B : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A] [comm_ring B]
variables [algebra R B] [algebra A B] [is_integral_closure A R B]
variables (R) {A} (B)
protected theorem is_integral [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R A B] (x : A) : is_integral R x :=
(is_integral_algebra_map_iff (algebra_map_injective A R B)).mp $
show is_integral R (algebra_map A B x), from is_integral_iff.mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩
theorem is_integral_algebra [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R A B] :
algebra.is_integral R A :=
λ x, is_integral_closure.is_integral R B x
variables {R} (A) {B}
/-- If `x : B` is integral over `R`, then it is an element of the integral closure of `R` in `B`. -/
noncomputable def mk' (x : B) (hx : is_integral R x) : A :=
classical.some (is_integral_iff.mp hx)
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_mk' (x : B) (hx : is_integral R x) :
algebra_map A B (mk' A x hx) = x :=
classical.some_spec (is_integral_iff.mp hx)
@[simp] lemma mk'_one (h : is_integral R (1 : B) := is_integral_one) :
mk' A 1 h = 1 :=
algebra_map_injective A R B $ by rw [algebra_map_mk', ring_hom.map_one]
@[simp] lemma mk'_zero (h : is_integral R (0 : B) := is_integral_zero) :
mk' A 0 h = 0 :=
algebra_map_injective A R B $ by rw [algebra_map_mk', ring_hom.map_zero]
@[simp] lemma mk'_add (x y : B) (hx : is_integral R x) (hy : is_integral R y) :
mk' A (x + y) (is_integral_add hx hy) = mk' A x hx + mk' A y hy :=
algebra_map_injective A R B $ by simp only [algebra_map_mk', ring_hom.map_add]
@[simp] lemma mk'_mul (x y : B) (hx : is_integral R x) (hy : is_integral R y) :
mk' A (x * y) (is_integral_mul hx hy) = mk' A x hx * mk' A y hy :=
algebra_map_injective A R B $ by simp only [algebra_map_mk', ring_hom.map_mul]
@[simp] lemma mk'_algebra_map [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R A B] (x : R)
(h : is_integral R (algebra_map R B x) := is_integral_algebra_map) :
is_integral_closure.mk' A (algebra_map R B x) h = algebra_map R A x :=
algebra_map_injective A R B $ by rw [algebra_map_mk', ← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply]
section lift
variables {R} (A B) {S : Type*} [comm_ring S] [algebra R S] [algebra S B] [is_scalar_tower R S B]
variables [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R A B] (h : algebra.is_integral R S)
/-- If `B / S / R` is a tower of ring extensions where `S` is integral over `R`,
then `S` maps (uniquely) into an integral closure `B / A / R`. -/
noncomputable def lift : S →ₐ[R] A :=
{ to_fun := λ x, mk' A (algebra_map S B x) (is_integral.algebra_map (h x)),
map_one' := by simp only [ring_hom.map_one, mk'_one],
map_zero' := by simp only [ring_hom.map_zero, mk'_zero],
map_add' := λ x y, by simp_rw [← mk'_add, ring_hom.map_add],
map_mul' := λ x y, by simp_rw [← mk'_mul, ring_hom.map_mul],
commutes' := λ x, by simp_rw [← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply, mk'_algebra_map] }
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_lift (x : S) : algebra_map A B (lift A B h x) = algebra_map S B x :=
algebra_map_mk' _ _ _
end lift
section equiv
variables (R A B) (A' : Type*) [comm_ring A'] [algebra A' B] [is_integral_closure A' R B]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R A'] [is_scalar_tower R A B] [is_scalar_tower R A' B]
/-- Integral closures are all isomorphic to each other. -/
noncomputable def equiv : A ≃ₐ[R] A' :=
alg_equiv.of_alg_hom (lift _ B (is_integral_algebra R B)) (lift _ B (is_integral_algebra R B))
(by { ext x, apply algebra_map_injective A' R B, simp })
(by { ext x, apply algebra_map_injective A R B, simp })
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_equiv (x : A) : algebra_map A' B (equiv R A B A' x) = algebra_map A B x :=
algebra_map_lift _ _ _ _
end equiv
end is_integral_closure
end is_integral_closure
section algebra
open algebra
variables {R A B S T : Type*}
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A] [comm_ring B] [comm_ring S] [comm_ring T]
variables [algebra A B] [algebra R B] (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T)
lemma is_integral_trans_aux (x : B) {p : A[X]} (pmonic : monic p) (hp : aeval x p = 0) :
is_integral (adjoin R (↑(p.map $ algebra_map A B).frange : set B)) x :=
begin
generalize hS : (↑(p.map $ algebra_map A B).frange : set B) = S,
have coeffs_mem : ∀ i, (p.map $ algebra_map A B).coeff i ∈ adjoin R S,
{ intro i, by_cases hi : (p.map $ algebra_map A B).coeff i = 0,
{ rw hi, exact subalgebra.zero_mem _ },
rw ← hS,
exact subset_adjoin (coeff_mem_frange _ _ hi) },
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ : ∃ q : (adjoin R S)[X], q.map (algebra_map (adjoin R S) B) =
(p.map $ algebra_map A B),
{ rw ← set.mem_range, exact (polynomial.mem_map_range _).2 (λ i, ⟨⟨_, coeffs_mem i⟩, rfl⟩) },
use q,
split,
{ suffices h : (q.map (algebra_map (adjoin R S) B)).monic,
{ refine monic_of_injective _ h,
exact subtype.val_injective },
{ rw hq, exact pmonic.map _ } },
{ convert hp using 1,
replace hq := congr_arg (eval x) hq,
convert hq using 1; symmetry; apply eval_map },
end
variables [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
/-- If A is an R-algebra all of whose elements are integral over R,
and x is an element of an A-algebra that is integral over A, then x is integral over R.-/
lemma is_integral_trans (A_int : is_integral R A) (x : B) (hx : is_integral A x) :
is_integral R x :=
begin
rcases hx with ⟨p, pmonic, hp⟩,
let S : set B := ↑(p.map $ algebra_map A B).frange,
refine is_integral_of_mem_of_fg (adjoin R (S ∪ {x})) _ _ (subset_adjoin $ or.inr rfl),
refine fg_trans (fg_adjoin_of_finite (finset.finite_to_set _) (λ x hx, _)) _,
{ rw [finset.mem_coe, frange, finset.mem_image] at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨i, _, rfl⟩,
rw coeff_map,
exact is_integral_alg_hom (is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom R A B) (A_int _) },
{ apply fg_adjoin_singleton_of_integral,
exact is_integral_trans_aux _ pmonic hp }
end
/-- If A is an R-algebra all of whose elements are integral over R,
and B is an A-algebra all of whose elements are integral over A,
then all elements of B are integral over R.-/
lemma algebra.is_integral_trans (hA : is_integral R A) (hB : is_integral A B) : is_integral R B :=
λ x, is_integral_trans hA x (hB x)
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_trans (hf : f.is_integral) (hg : g.is_integral) :
(g.comp f).is_integral :=
@algebra.is_integral_trans R S T _ _ _ g.to_algebra (g.comp f).to_algebra f.to_algebra
(@is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq R S T _ _ _ f.to_algebra g.to_algebra (g.comp f).to_algebra
(ring_hom.comp_apply g f)) hf hg
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_of_surjective (hf : function.surjective f) : f.is_integral :=
λ x, (hf x).rec_on (λ y hy, (hy ▸ f.is_integral_map : f.is_integral_elem x))
lemma is_integral_of_surjective (h : function.surjective (algebra_map R A)) : is_integral R A :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_of_surjective h
/-- If `R → A → B` is an algebra tower with `A → B` injective,
then if the entire tower is an integral extension so is `R → A` -/
lemma is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral (H : function.injective (algebra_map A B))
{x : A} (h : is_integral R (algebra_map A B x)) : is_integral R x :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨p, ⟨hp, hp'⟩⟩,
refine ⟨p, ⟨hp, _⟩⟩,
rw [is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq R A B, ← eval₂_map,
eval₂_hom, ← ring_hom.map_zero (algebra_map A B)] at hp',
rw [eval₂_eq_eval_map],
exact H hp',
end
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral (hg : function.injective g)
(hfg : (g.comp f).is_integral) : f.is_integral :=
λ x,
@is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral R S T _ _ _ g.to_algebra (g.comp f).to_algebra f.to_algebra
(@is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq R S T _ _ _ f.to_algebra g.to_algebra (g.comp f).to_algebra
(ring_hom.comp_apply g f)) hg x (hfg (g x))
lemma is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral_field {R A B : Type*} [comm_ring R] [field A]
[comm_ring B] [nontrivial B] [algebra R A] [algebra A B] [algebra R B] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
{x : A} (h : is_integral R (algebra_map A B x)) : is_integral R x :=
is_integral_tower_bot_of_is_integral (algebra_map A B).injective h
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_elem_of_is_integral_elem_comp {x : T}
(h : (g.comp f).is_integral_elem x) : g.is_integral_elem x :=
let ⟨p, ⟨hp, hp'⟩⟩ := h in ⟨p.map f, hp.map f, by rwa ← eval₂_map at hp'⟩
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_tower_top_of_is_integral (h : (g.comp f).is_integral) : g.is_integral :=
λ x, ring_hom.is_integral_elem_of_is_integral_elem_comp f g (h x)
/-- If `R → A → B` is an algebra tower,
then if the entire tower is an integral extension so is `A → B`. -/
lemma is_integral_tower_top_of_is_integral {x : B} (h : is_integral R x) : is_integral A x :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨p, ⟨hp, hp'⟩⟩,
refine ⟨p.map (algebra_map R A), ⟨hp.map (algebra_map R A), _⟩⟩,
rw [is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq R A B, ← eval₂_map] at hp',
exact hp',
end
lemma ring_hom.is_integral_quotient_of_is_integral {I : ideal S} (hf : f.is_integral) :
(ideal.quotient_map I f le_rfl).is_integral :=
begin
rintros ⟨x⟩,
obtain ⟨p, ⟨p_monic, hpx⟩⟩ := hf x,
refine ⟨p.map (ideal.quotient.mk _), ⟨p_monic.map _, _⟩⟩,
simpa only [hom_eval₂, eval₂_map] using congr_arg (ideal.quotient.mk I) hpx
end
lemma is_integral_quotient_of_is_integral {I : ideal A} (hRA : is_integral R A) :
is_integral (R ⧸ I.comap (algebra_map R A)) (A ⧸ I) :=
(algebra_map R A).is_integral_quotient_of_is_integral hRA
lemma is_integral_quotient_map_iff {I : ideal S} :
(ideal.quotient_map I f le_rfl).is_integral ↔
((ideal.quotient.mk I).comp f : R →+* S ⧸ I).is_integral :=
begin
let g := ideal.quotient.mk (I.comap f),
have := ideal.quotient_map_comp_mk le_rfl,
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, ring_hom.is_integral_tower_top_of_is_integral g _ (this ▸ h)⟩,
refine this ▸ ring_hom.is_integral_trans g (ideal.quotient_map I f le_rfl) _ h,
exact ring_hom.is_integral_of_surjective g ideal.quotient.mk_surjective,
end
/-- If the integral extension `R → S` is injective, and `S` is a field, then `R` is also a field. -/
lemma is_field_of_is_integral_of_is_field
{R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [nontrivial R] [comm_ring S] [is_domain S]
[algebra R S] (H : is_integral R S) (hRS : function.injective (algebra_map R S))
(hS : is_field S) : is_field R :=
begin
refine ⟨⟨0, 1, zero_ne_one⟩, mul_comm, λ a ha, _⟩,
-- Let `a_inv` be the inverse of `algebra_map R S a`,
-- then we need to show that `a_inv` is of the form `algebra_map R S b`.
obtain ⟨a_inv, ha_inv⟩ := hS.mul_inv_cancel (λ h, ha (hRS (trans h (ring_hom.map_zero _).symm))),
-- Let `p : R[X]` be monic with root `a_inv`,
-- and `q` be `p` with coefficients reversed (so `q(a) = q'(a) * a + 1`).
-- We claim that `q(a) = 0`, so `-q'(a)` is the inverse of `a`.
obtain ⟨p, p_monic, hp⟩ := H a_inv,
use -∑ (i : ℕ) in finset.range p.nat_degree, (p.coeff i) * a ^ (p.nat_degree - i - 1),
-- `q(a) = 0`, because multiplying everything with `a_inv^n` gives `p(a_inv) = 0`.
-- TODO: this could be a lemma for `polynomial.reverse`.
have hq : ∑ (i : ℕ) in finset.range (p.nat_degree + 1), (p.coeff i) * a ^ (p.nat_degree - i) = 0,
{ apply (injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebra_map R S)).mp hRS,
have a_inv_ne_zero : a_inv ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul (mt ha_inv.symm.trans one_ne_zero),
refine (mul_eq_zero.mp _).resolve_right (pow_ne_zero p.nat_degree a_inv_ne_zero),
rw [eval₂_eq_sum_range] at hp,
rw [ring_hom.map_sum, finset.sum_mul],
refine (finset.sum_congr rfl (λ i hi, _)).trans hp,
rw [ring_hom.map_mul, mul_assoc],
congr,
have : a_inv ^ p.nat_degree = a_inv ^ (p.nat_degree - i) * a_inv ^ i,
{ rw [← pow_add a_inv, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (nat.le_of_lt_succ (finset.mem_range.mp hi))] },
rw [ring_hom.map_pow, this, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_pow, ha_inv, one_pow, one_mul] },
-- Since `q(a) = 0` and `q(a) = q'(a) * a + 1`, we have `a * -q'(a) = 1`.
-- TODO: we could use a lemma for `polynomial.div_X` here.
rw [finset.sum_range_succ_comm, p_monic.coeff_nat_degree, one_mul, tsub_self, pow_zero,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm] at hq,
rw [mul_comm, neg_mul, finset.sum_mul],
convert hq using 2,
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ i hi, _),
have : 1 ≤ p.nat_degree - i := le_tsub_of_add_le_left (finset.mem_range.mp hi),
rw [mul_assoc, ← pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le this]
end
lemma is_field_of_is_integral_of_is_field'
{R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] [is_domain S] [algebra R S]
(H : algebra.is_integral R S) (hR : is_field R) :
is_field S :=
begin
letI := hR.to_field,
refine ⟨⟨0, 1, zero_ne_one⟩, mul_comm, λ x hx, _⟩,
let A := algebra.adjoin R ({x} : set S),
haveI : is_noetherian R A :=
is_noetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian A.to_submodule (fg_adjoin_singleton_of_integral x (H x)),
haveI : module.finite R A := module.is_noetherian.finite R A,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := linear_map.surjective_of_injective (@linear_map.mul_left_injective R A _ _ _ _
⟨x, subset_adjoin (set.mem_singleton x)⟩ (λ h, hx (subtype.ext_iff.mp h))) 1,
exact ⟨y, subtype.ext_iff.mp hy⟩,
end
lemma algebra.is_integral.is_field_iff_is_field
{R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [nontrivial R] [comm_ring S] [is_domain S] [algebra R S]
(H : algebra.is_integral R S) (hRS : function.injective (algebra_map R S)) :
is_field R ↔ is_field S :=
⟨is_field_of_is_integral_of_is_field' H, is_field_of_is_integral_of_is_field H hRS⟩
end algebra
theorem integral_closure_idem {R : Type*} {A : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A] [algebra R A] :
integral_closure (integral_closure R A : set A) A = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ x hx, algebra.mem_bot.2
⟨⟨x, @is_integral_trans _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (integral_closure R A).algebra
_ integral_closure.is_integral x hx⟩, rfl⟩
section is_domain
variables {R S : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] [is_domain S] [algebra R S]
instance : is_domain (integral_closure R S) :=
infer_instance
end is_domain
|
1a6e561a7d0cb3f196064f18f546f8e1ab3dde70 | 3dd1b66af77106badae6edb1c4dea91a146ead30 | /library/standard/wf.lean | f56d3d30f42a0ea5efa45f77536280e2b0aeb9c4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | silky/lean | 79c20c15c93feef47bb659a2cc139b26f3614642 | df8b88dca2f8da1a422cb618cd476ef5be730546 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,737,587,697 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 22,362,176 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,537 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Author: Leonardo de Moura
import logic classical
-- Well-founded relation definition
-- We are essentially saying that a relation R is well-founded
-- if every non-empty "set" P, has a R-minimal element
definition wf {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) : Prop
:= ∀P, (∃w, P w) → ∃min, P min ∧ ∀b, R b min → ¬P b
-- Well-founded induction theorem
theorem wf_induction {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop} {P : A → Prop} (Hwf : wf R) (iH : ∀x, (∀y, R y x → P y) → P x)
: ∀x, P x
:= by_contradiction (assume N : ¬∀x, P x,
obtain (w : A) (Hw : ¬P w), from not_forall_exists N,
-- The main "trick" is to define Q x as ¬P x.
-- Since R is well-founded, there must be a R-minimal element r s.t. Q r (which is ¬P r)
let Q [inline] x := ¬P x in
have Qw : ∃w, Q w, from exists_intro w Hw,
have Qwf : ∃min, Q min ∧ ∀b, R b min → ¬Q b, from Hwf Q Qw,
obtain (r : A) (Hr : Q r ∧ ∀b, R b r → ¬Q b), from Qwf,
-- Using the inductive hypothesis iH and Hr, we show P r, and derive the contradiction.
have s1 : ∀b, R b r → P b, from
take b : A, assume H : R b r,
-- We are using Hr to derive ¬¬P b
not_not_elim (and_elim_right Hr b H),
have s2 : P r, from iH r s1,
have s3 : ¬P r, from and_elim_left Hr,
absurd s2 s3)
|
1c05ab19ba06af6a21a2f7dbce3520520a7a2fee | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/data/vector2.lean | ba40e788c7df87969a0aa21b399306e1ca1b8f7a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,294 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.vector
import data.list.nodup
import data.list.of_fn
import control.applicative
/-!
# Additional theorems about the `vector` type
This file introduces the infix notation `::ᵥ` for `vector.cons`.
-/
universes u
variables {n : ℕ}
namespace vector
variables {α : Type*}
infixr `::ᵥ`:67 := vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (vector α n) :=
⟨of_fn (λ _, default α)⟩
theorem to_list_injective : function.injective (@to_list α n) :=
subtype.val_injective
/-- Two `v w : vector α n` are equal iff they are equal at every single index. -/
@[ext] theorem ext : ∀ {v w : vector α n}
(h : ∀ m : fin n, vector.nth v m = vector.nth w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ h := subtype.eq (list.ext_le (by rw [hv, hw])
(λ m hm hn, h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩))
/-- The empty `vector` is a `subsingleton`. -/
instance zero_subsingleton : subsingleton (vector α 0) :=
⟨λ _ _, vector.ext (λ m, fin.elim0 m)⟩
@[simp] theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ (v : vector α n), (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_head (a : α) : ∀ (v : vector α n), (a ::ᵥ v).head = a
| ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_tail (a : α) : ∀ (v : vector α n), (a ::ᵥ v).tail = v
| ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem to_list_of_fn : ∀ {n} (f : fin n → α), to_list (of_fn f) = list.of_fn f
| 0 f := rfl
| (n+1) f := by rw [of_fn, list.of_fn_succ, to_list_cons, to_list_of_fn]
@[simp] theorem mk_to_list :
∀ (v : vector α n) h, (⟨to_list v, h⟩ : vector α n) = v
| ⟨l, h₁⟩ h₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_list_map {β : Type*} (v : vector α n) (f : α → β) : (v.map f).to_list =
v.to_list.map f := by cases v; refl
theorem nth_eq_nth_le : ∀ (v : vector α n) (i),
nth v i = v.to_list.nth_le i.1 (by rw to_list_length; exact i.2)
| ⟨l, h⟩ i := rfl
@[simp] lemma nth_map {β : Type*} (v : vector α n) (f : α → β) (i : fin n) :
(v.map f).nth i = f (v.nth i) :=
by simp [nth_eq_nth_le]
@[simp] theorem nth_of_fn {n} (f : fin n → α) (i) : nth (of_fn f) i = f i :=
by rw [nth_eq_nth_le, ← list.nth_le_of_fn f];
congr; apply to_list_of_fn
@[simp] theorem of_fn_nth (v : vector α n) : of_fn (nth v) = v :=
begin
rcases v with ⟨l, rfl⟩,
apply to_list_injective,
change nth ⟨l, eq.refl _⟩ with λ i, nth ⟨l, rfl⟩ i,
simpa only [to_list_of_fn] using list.of_fn_nth_le _
end
@[simp] theorem nth_tail : ∀ (v : vector α n.succ) (i : fin n),
nth (tail v) i = nth v i.succ
| ⟨a::l, e⟩ ⟨i, h⟩ := by simp [nth_eq_nth_le]; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_val : ∀ (v : vector α n.succ), v.tail.val = v.val.tail
| ⟨a::l, e⟩ := rfl
/-- The `tail` of a `nil` vector is `nil`. -/
@[simp] lemma tail_nil : (@nil α).tail = nil := rfl
/-- The `tail` of a vector made up of one element is `nil`. -/
@[simp] lemma singleton_tail (v : vector α 1) : v.tail = vector.nil :=
by simp only [←cons_head_tail, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp] theorem tail_of_fn {n : ℕ} (f : fin n.succ → α) :
tail (of_fn f) = of_fn (λ i, f i.succ) :=
(of_fn_nth _).symm.trans $ by congr; funext i; simp
/-- The list that makes up a `vector` made up of a single element,
retrieved via `to_list`, is equal to the list of that single element. -/
@[simp] lemma to_list_singleton (v : vector α 1) : v.to_list = [v.head] :=
begin
rw ←v.cons_head_tail,
simp only [to_list_cons, to_list_nil, cons_head, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self, singleton_tail]
end
/-- Mapping under `id` does not change a vector. -/
@[simp] lemma map_id {n : ℕ} (v : vector α n) : vector.map id v = v :=
vector.eq _ _ (by simp only [list.map_id, vector.to_list_map])
lemma mem_iff_nth {a : α} {v : vector α n} : a ∈ v.to_list ↔ ∃ i, v.nth i = a :=
by simp only [list.mem_iff_nth_le, fin.exists_iff, vector.nth_eq_nth_le];
exact ⟨λ ⟨i, hi, h⟩, ⟨i, by rwa to_list_length at hi, h⟩,
λ ⟨i, hi, h⟩, ⟨i, by rwa to_list_length, h⟩⟩
lemma nodup_iff_nth_inj {v : vector α n} : v.to_list.nodup ↔ function.injective v.nth :=
begin
cases v with l hl,
subst hl,
simp only [list.nodup_iff_nth_le_inj],
split,
{ intros h i j hij,
cases i, cases j, ext, apply h, simpa },
{ intros h i j hi hj hij,
have := @h ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩, simp [nth_eq_nth_le] at *, tauto }
end
@[simp] lemma nth_mem (i : fin n) (v : vector α n) : v.nth i ∈ v.to_list :=
by rw [nth_eq_nth_le]; exact list.nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem head'_to_list : ∀ (v : vector α n.succ),
(to_list v).head' = some (head v)
| ⟨a::l, e⟩ := rfl
def reverse (v : vector α n) : vector α n :=
⟨v.to_list.reverse, by simp⟩
/-- The `list` of a vector after a `reverse`, retrieved by `to_list` is equal
to the `list.reverse` after retrieving a vector's `to_list`. -/
lemma to_list_reverse {v : vector α n} : v.reverse.to_list = v.to_list.reverse := rfl
@[simp] theorem nth_zero : ∀ (v : vector α n.succ), nth v 0 = head v
| ⟨a::l, e⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_of_fn
{n : ℕ} (f : fin n.succ → α) : head (of_fn f) = f 0 :=
by rw [← nth_zero, nth_of_fn]
@[simp] theorem nth_cons_zero
(a : α) (v : vector α n) : nth (a ::ᵥ v) 0 = a :=
by simp [nth_zero]
/-- Accessing the `nth` element of a vector made up
of one element `x : α` is `x` itself. -/
@[simp] lemma nth_cons_nil {ix : fin 1}
(x : α) : nth (x ::ᵥ nil) ix = x :=
by convert nth_cons_zero x nil
@[simp] theorem nth_cons_succ
(a : α) (v : vector α n) (i : fin n) : nth (a ::ᵥ v) i.succ = nth v i :=
by rw [← nth_tail, tail_cons]
/-- The last element of a `vector`, given that the vector is at least one element. -/
def last (v : vector α (n + 1)) : α := v.nth (fin.last n)
/-- The last element of a `vector`, given that the vector is at least one element. -/
lemma last_def {v : vector α (n + 1)} : v.last = v.nth (fin.last n) := rfl
/-- The `last` element of a vector is the `head` of the `reverse` vector. -/
lemma reverse_nth_zero {v : vector α (n + 1)} : v.reverse.head = v.last :=
begin
have : 0 = v.to_list.length - 1 - n,
{ simp only [nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, to_list_length, nat.sub_self,
list.length_reverse] },
rw [←nth_zero, last_def, nth_eq_nth_le, nth_eq_nth_le],
simp_rw [to_list_reverse, fin.val_eq_coe, fin.coe_last, fin.coe_zero, this],
rw list.nth_le_reverse,
end
section scan
variables {β : Type*}
variables (f : β → α → β) (b : β)
variables (v : vector α n)
/--
Construct a `vector β (n + 1)` from a `vector α n` by scanning `f : β → α → β`
from the "left", that is, from 0 to `fin.last n`, using `b : β` as the starting value.
-/
def scanl : vector β (n + 1) :=
⟨list.scanl f b v.to_list, by rw [list.length_scanl, to_list_length]⟩
/-- Providing an empty vector to `scanl` gives the starting value `b : β`. -/
@[simp] lemma scanl_nil : scanl f b nil = b ::ᵥ nil := rfl
/--
The recursive step of `scanl` splits a vector `x ::ᵥ v : vector α (n + 1)`
into the provided starting value `b : β` and the recursed `scanl`
`f b x : β` as the starting value.
This lemma is the `cons` version of `scanl_nth`.
-/
@[simp] lemma scanl_cons (x : α) : scanl f b (x ::ᵥ v) = b ::ᵥ scanl f (f b x) v :=
by simpa only [scanl, to_list_cons]
/--
The underlying `list` of a `vector` after a `scanl` is the `list.scanl`
of the underlying `list` of the original `vector`.
-/
@[simp] lemma scanl_val : ∀ {v : vector α n}, (scanl f b v).val = list.scanl f b v.val
| ⟨l, hl⟩ := rfl
/--
The `to_list` of a `vector` after a `scanl` is the `list.scanl`
of the `to_list` of the original `vector`.
-/
@[simp] lemma to_list_scanl : (scanl f b v).to_list = list.scanl f b v.to_list := rfl
/--
The recursive step of `scanl` splits a vector made up of a single element
`x ::ᵥ nil : vector α 1` into a `vector` of the provided starting value `b : β`
and the mapped `f b x : β` as the last value.
-/
@[simp] lemma scanl_singleton (v : vector α 1) : scanl f b v = b ::ᵥ f b v.head ::ᵥ nil :=
begin
rw [←cons_head_tail v],
simp only [scanl_cons, scanl_nil, cons_head, singleton_tail]
end
/--
The first element of `scanl` of a vector `v : vector α n`,
retrieved via `head`, is the starting value `b : β`.
-/
@[simp] lemma scanl_head : (scanl f b v).head = b :=
begin
cases n,
{ have : v = nil := by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton],
simp only [this, scanl_nil, cons_head] },
{ rw ←cons_head_tail v,
simp only [←nth_zero, nth_eq_nth_le, to_list_scanl,
to_list_cons, list.scanl, fin.val_zero', list.nth_le] }
end
/--
For an index `i : fin n`, the `nth` element of `scanl` of a
vector `v : vector α n` at `i.succ`, is equal to the application
function `f : β → α → β` of the `i.cast_succ` element of
`scanl f b v` and `nth v i`.
This lemma is the `nth` version of `scanl_cons`.
-/
@[simp] lemma scanl_nth (i : fin n) :
(scanl f b v).nth i.succ = f ((scanl f b v).nth i.cast_succ) (v.nth i) :=
begin
cases n,
{ exact fin_zero_elim i },
induction n with n hn generalizing b,
{ have i0 : i = 0 := by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton],
simpa only [scanl_singleton, i0, nth_zero] },
{ rw [←cons_head_tail v, scanl_cons, nth_cons_succ],
refine fin.cases _ _ i,
{ simp only [nth_zero, scanl_head, fin.cast_succ_zero, cons_head] },
{ intro i',
simp only [hn, fin.cast_succ_fin_succ, nth_cons_succ] } }
end
end scan
def m_of_fn {m} [monad m] {α : Type u} : ∀ {n}, (fin n → m α) → m (vector α n)
| 0 f := pure nil
| (n+1) f := do a ← f 0, v ← m_of_fn (λi, f i.succ), pure (a ::ᵥ v)
theorem m_of_fn_pure {m} [monad m] [is_lawful_monad m] {α} :
∀ {n} (f : fin n → α), @m_of_fn m _ _ _ (λ i, pure (f i)) = pure (of_fn f)
| 0 f := rfl
| (n+1) f := by simp [m_of_fn, @m_of_fn_pure n, of_fn]
def mmap {m} [monad m] {α} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) :
∀ {n}, vector α n → m (vector β n)
| 0 xs := pure nil
| (n+1) xs := do h' ← f xs.head, t' ← @mmap n xs.tail, pure (h' ::ᵥ t')
@[simp] theorem mmap_nil {m} [monad m] {α β} (f : α → m β) :
mmap f nil = pure nil := rfl
@[simp] theorem mmap_cons {m} [monad m] {α β} (f : α → m β) (a) :
∀ {n} (v : vector α n), mmap f (a ::ᵥ v) =
do h' ← f a, t' ← mmap f v, pure (h' ::ᵥ t')
| _ ⟨l, rfl⟩ := rfl
/-- Define `C v` by induction on `v : vector α (n + 1)`, a vector of
at least one element.
This function has two arguments: `h0` handles the base case on `C nil`,
and `hs` defines the inductive step using `∀ x : α, C v → C (x ::ᵥ v)`. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def induction_on
{α : Type*} {n : ℕ}
{C : Π {n : ℕ}, vector α n → Sort*}
(v : vector α (n + 1))
(h0 : C nil)
(hs : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x : α} {w : vector α n}, C w → C (x ::ᵥ w)) :
C v :=
begin
induction n with n hn,
{ rw ←v.cons_head_tail,
convert hs h0 },
{ rw ←v.cons_head_tail,
apply hs,
apply hn }
end
def to_array : vector α n → array n α
| ⟨xs, h⟩ := cast (by rw h) xs.to_array
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
def insert_nth (a : α) (i : fin (n+1)) (v : vector α n) : vector α (n+1) :=
⟨v.1.insert_nth i a,
begin
rw [list.length_insert_nth, v.2],
rw [v.2, ← nat.succ_le_succ_iff],
exact i.2
end⟩
lemma insert_nth_val {i : fin (n+1)} {v : vector α n} :
(v.insert_nth a i).val = v.val.insert_nth i.1 a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma remove_nth_val {i : fin n} :
∀{v : vector α n}, (remove_nth i v).val = v.val.remove_nth i
| ⟨l, hl⟩ := rfl
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth {v : vector α n} {i : fin (n+1)} :
remove_nth i (insert_nth a i v) = v :=
subtype.eq $ list.remove_nth_insert_nth i.1 v.1
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth' {v : vector α (n+1)} :
∀{i : fin (n+1)} {j : fin (n+2)},
remove_nth (j.succ_above i) (insert_nth a j v) = insert_nth a (i.pred_above j) (remove_nth i v)
| ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ :=
begin
dsimp [insert_nth, remove_nth, fin.succ_above, fin.pred_above],
simp only [subtype.mk_eq_mk],
split_ifs,
{ convert (list.insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge i (j-1) _ _ _).symm,
{ convert (nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos _).symm, exact lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) h, },
{ apply remove_nth_val, },
{ convert hi, exact v.2, },
{ exact nat.le_pred_of_lt h, }, },
{ convert (list.insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le i j _ _ _).symm,
{ apply remove_nth_val, },
{ convert hi, exact v.2, },
{ simpa using h, }, }
end
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) (i j : fin (n+1)) (h : i ≤ j) :
∀(v : vector α n),
(v.insert_nth a i).insert_nth b j.succ = (v.insert_nth b j).insert_nth a i.cast_succ
| ⟨l, hl⟩ :=
begin
refine subtype.eq _,
simp only [insert_nth_val, fin.coe_succ, fin.cast_succ, fin.val_eq_coe, fin.coe_cast_add],
apply list.insert_nth_comm,
{ assumption },
{ rw hl, exact nat.le_of_succ_le_succ j.2 }
end
end insert_nth
section update_nth
/-- `update_nth v n a` replaces the `n`th element of `v` with `a` -/
def update_nth (v : vector α n) (i : fin n) (a : α) : vector α n :=
⟨v.1.update_nth i.1 a, by rw [list.update_nth_length, v.2]⟩
@[simp] lemma nth_update_nth_same (v : vector α n) (i : fin n) (a : α) :
(v.update_nth i a).nth i = a :=
by cases v; cases i; simp [vector.update_nth, vector.nth_eq_nth_le]
lemma nth_update_nth_of_ne {v : vector α n} {i j : fin n} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α) :
(v.update_nth i a).nth j = v.nth j :=
by cases v; cases i; cases j; simp [vector.update_nth, vector.nth_eq_nth_le,
list.nth_le_update_nth_of_ne (fin.vne_of_ne h)]
lemma nth_update_nth_eq_if {v : vector α n} {i j : fin n} (a : α) :
(v.update_nth i a).nth j = if i = j then a else v.nth j :=
by split_ifs; try {simp *}; try {rw nth_update_nth_of_ne}; assumption
end update_nth
end vector
namespace vector
section traverse
variables {F G : Type u → Type u}
variables [applicative F] [applicative G]
open applicative functor
open list (cons) nat
private def traverse_aux {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β) :
Π (x : list α), F (vector β x.length)
| [] := pure vector.nil
| (x::xs) := vector.cons <$> f x <*> traverse_aux xs
protected def traverse {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β) : vector α n → F (vector β n)
| ⟨v, Hv⟩ := cast (by rw Hv) $ traverse_aux f v
variables [is_lawful_applicative F] [is_lawful_applicative G]
variables {α β γ : Type u}
@[simp] protected lemma traverse_def
(f : α → F β) (x : α) : ∀ (xs : vector α n),
(x ::ᵥ xs).traverse f = cons <$> f x <*> xs.traverse f :=
by rintro ⟨xs, rfl⟩; refl
protected lemma id_traverse : ∀ (x : vector α n), x.traverse id.mk = x :=
begin
rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩, dsimp [vector.traverse, cast],
induction x with x xs IH, {refl},
simp! [IH], refl
end
open function
protected lemma comp_traverse (f : β → F γ) (g : α → G β) : ∀ (x : vector α n),
vector.traverse (comp.mk ∘ functor.map f ∘ g) x =
comp.mk (vector.traverse f <$> vector.traverse g x) :=
by rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩; dsimp [vector.traverse, cast];
induction x with x xs; simp! [cast, *] with functor_norm;
[refl, simp [(∘)]]
protected lemma traverse_eq_map_id {α β} (f : α → β) : ∀ (x : vector α n),
x.traverse (id.mk ∘ f) = id.mk (map f x) :=
by rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩; simp!;
induction x; simp! * with functor_norm; refl
variable (η : applicative_transformation F G)
protected lemma naturality {α β : Type*}
(f : α → F β) : ∀ (x : vector α n),
η (x.traverse f) = x.traverse (@η _ ∘ f) :=
by rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩; simp! [cast];
induction x with x xs IH; simp! * with functor_norm
end traverse
instance : traversable.{u} (flip vector n) :=
{ traverse := @vector.traverse n,
map := λ α β, @vector.map.{u u} α β n }
instance : is_lawful_traversable.{u} (flip vector n) :=
{ id_traverse := @vector.id_traverse n,
comp_traverse := @vector.comp_traverse n,
traverse_eq_map_id := @vector.traverse_eq_map_id n,
naturality := @vector.naturality n,
id_map := by intros; cases x; simp! [(<$>)],
comp_map := by intros; cases x; simp! [(<$>)] }
end vector
|
d155e01ebb1b1ea49dca577dfe3b4beb29178dab | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/analysis/special_functions/exponential.lean | dccb029c003ca3134815bae2432b6a9010e91dfc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,030 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import analysis.normed_space.exponential
import analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic
import topology.metric_space.cau_seq_filter
/-!
# Calculus results on exponential in a Banach algebra
In this file, we prove basic properties about the derivative of the exponential map `exp 𝕂`
in a Banach algebra `𝔸` over a field `𝕂`. We keep them separate from the main file
`analysis/normed_space/exponential` in order to minimize dependencies.
## Main results
We prove most result for an arbitrary field `𝕂`, and then specialize to `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`.
### General case
- `has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos` : `exp 𝕂` has strict Fréchet-derivative
`1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero, as long as it converges on a neighborhood of zero
(see also `has_strict_deriv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos` for the case `𝔸 = 𝕂`)
- `has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_of_lt_radius` : if `𝕂` has characteristic zero and `𝔸` is commutative,
then given a point `x` in the disk of convergence, `exp 𝕂` as strict Fréchet-derivative
`exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at x (see also `has_strict_deriv_at_exp_of_lt_radius` for the case
`𝔸 = 𝕂`)
### `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`
- `has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_zero` : `exp 𝕂` has strict Fréchet-derivative `1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero
(see also `has_strict_deriv_at_exp_zero` for the case `𝔸 = 𝕂`)
- `has_strict_fderiv_at_exp` : if `𝔸` is commutative, then given any point `x`, `exp 𝕂` as strict
Fréchet-derivative `exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at x (see also `has_strict_deriv_at_exp` for the
case `𝔸 = 𝕂`)
### Compatibilty with `real.exp` and `complex.exp`
- `complex.exp_eq_exp_ℂ` : `complex.exp = exp ℂ ℂ`
- `real.exp_eq_exp_ℝ` : `real.exp = exp ℝ ℝ`
-/
open filter is_R_or_C continuous_multilinear_map normed_field asymptotics
open_locale nat topology big_operators ennreal
section any_field_any_algebra
variables {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕂] [normed_ring 𝔸] [normed_algebra 𝕂 𝔸]
[complete_space 𝔸]
/-- The exponential in a Banach-algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` has strict Fréchet-derivative
`1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero, as long as it converges on a neighborhood of zero. -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (h : 0 < (exp_series 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) 0 :=
begin
convert (has_fpower_series_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos h).has_strict_fderiv_at,
ext x,
change x = exp_series 𝕂 𝔸 1 (λ _, x),
simp [exp_series_apply_eq]
end
/-- The exponential in a Banach-algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` has Fréchet-derivative
`1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero, as long as it converges on a neighborhood of zero. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (h : 0 < (exp_series 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
has_fderiv_at (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) 0 :=
(has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos h).has_fderiv_at
end any_field_any_algebra
section any_field_comm_algebra
variables {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕂] [normed_comm_ring 𝔸] [normed_algebra 𝕂 𝔸]
[complete_space 𝔸]
/-- The exponential map in a commutative Banach-algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` of
characteristic zero has Fréchet-derivative `exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at any point `x` in the
disk of convergence. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_exp_of_mem_ball [char_zero 𝕂] {x : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (exp_series 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
has_fderiv_at (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) x :=
begin
have hpos : 0 < (exp_series 𝕂 𝔸).radius := (zero_le _).trans_lt hx,
rw has_fderiv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero,
suffices : (λ h, exp 𝕂 x * (exp 𝕂 (0 + h) - exp 𝕂 0 - continuous_linear_map.id 𝕂 𝔸 h))
=ᶠ[𝓝 0] (λ h, exp 𝕂 (x + h) - exp 𝕂 x - exp 𝕂 x • continuous_linear_map.id 𝕂 𝔸 h),
{ refine (is_o.const_mul_left _ _).congr' this (eventually_eq.refl _ _),
rw ← has_fderiv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero,
exact has_fderiv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos hpos },
have : ∀ᶠ h in 𝓝 (0 : 𝔸), h ∈ emetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (exp_series 𝕂 𝔸).radius :=
emetric.ball_mem_nhds _ hpos,
filter_upwards [this] with _ hh,
rw [exp_add_of_mem_ball hx hh, exp_zero, zero_add, continuous_linear_map.id_apply, smul_eq_mul],
ring
end
/-- The exponential map in a commutative Banach-algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` of
characteristic zero has strict Fréchet-derivative `exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at any point `x` in
the disk of convergence. -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_of_mem_ball [char_zero 𝕂] {x : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (exp_series 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) x :=
let ⟨p, hp⟩ := analytic_at_exp_of_mem_ball x hx in
hp.has_fderiv_at.unique (has_fderiv_at_exp_of_mem_ball hx) ▸ hp.has_strict_fderiv_at
end any_field_comm_algebra
section deriv
variables {𝕂 : Type*} [nontrivially_normed_field 𝕂] [complete_space 𝕂]
/-- The exponential map in a complete normed field `𝕂` of characteristic zero has strict derivative
`exp 𝕂 x` at any point `x` in the disk of convergence. -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_exp_of_mem_ball [char_zero 𝕂] {x : 𝕂}
(hx : x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : 𝕂) (exp_series 𝕂 𝕂).radius) :
has_strict_deriv_at (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x) x :=
by simpa using (has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_of_mem_ball hx).has_strict_deriv_at
/-- The exponential map in a complete normed field `𝕂` of characteristic zero has derivative
`exp 𝕂 x` at any point `x` in the disk of convergence. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_exp_of_mem_ball [char_zero 𝕂] {x : 𝕂}
(hx : x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : 𝕂) (exp_series 𝕂 𝕂).radius) :
has_deriv_at (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_exp_of_mem_ball hx).has_deriv_at
/-- The exponential map in a complete normed field `𝕂` of characteristic zero has strict derivative
`1` at zero, as long as it converges on a neighborhood of zero. -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (h : 0 < (exp_series 𝕂 𝕂).radius) :
has_strict_deriv_at (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝕂) 0 :=
(has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos h).has_strict_deriv_at
/-- The exponential map in a complete normed field `𝕂` of characteristic zero has derivative
`1` at zero, as long as it converges on a neighborhood of zero. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (h : 0 < (exp_series 𝕂 𝕂).radius) :
has_deriv_at (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝕂) 0 :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos h).has_deriv_at
end deriv
section is_R_or_C_any_algebra
variables {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕂] [normed_ring 𝔸] [normed_algebra 𝕂 𝔸]
[complete_space 𝔸]
/-- The exponential in a Banach-algebra `𝔸` over `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ` has strict Fréchet-derivative
`1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero. -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_zero :
has_strict_fderiv_at (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) 0 :=
has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (exp_series_radius_pos 𝕂 𝔸)
/-- The exponential in a Banach-algebra `𝔸` over `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ` has Fréchet-derivative
`1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_exp_zero :
has_fderiv_at (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) 0 :=
has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_zero.has_fderiv_at
end is_R_or_C_any_algebra
section is_R_or_C_comm_algebra
variables {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕂] [normed_comm_ring 𝔸] [normed_algebra 𝕂 𝔸]
[complete_space 𝔸]
/-- The exponential map in a commutative Banach-algebra `𝔸` over `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ` has strict
Fréchet-derivative `exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at any point `x`. -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_exp {x : 𝔸} :
has_strict_fderiv_at (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) x :=
has_strict_fderiv_at_exp_of_mem_ball ((exp_series_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝔸).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
/-- The exponential map in a commutative Banach-algebra `𝔸` over `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ` has
Fréchet-derivative `exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at any point `x`. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_exp {x : 𝔸} :
has_fderiv_at (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) x :=
has_strict_fderiv_at_exp.has_fderiv_at
end is_R_or_C_comm_algebra
section deriv_R_or_C
variables {𝕂 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕂]
/-- The exponential map in `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ` has strict derivative `exp 𝕂 x` at any point
`x`. -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_exp {x : 𝕂} : has_strict_deriv_at (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x) x :=
has_strict_deriv_at_exp_of_mem_ball ((exp_series_radius_eq_top 𝕂 𝕂).symm ▸ edist_lt_top _ _)
/-- The exponential map in `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ` has derivative `exp 𝕂 x` at any point `x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_exp {x : 𝕂} : has_deriv_at (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x) x :=
has_strict_deriv_at_exp.has_deriv_at
/-- The exponential map in `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ` has strict derivative `1` at zero. -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_exp_zero : has_strict_deriv_at (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝕂) 0 :=
has_strict_deriv_at_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (exp_series_radius_pos 𝕂 𝕂)
/-- The exponential map in `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ` has derivative `1` at zero. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_exp_zero :
has_deriv_at (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝕂) 0 :=
has_strict_deriv_at_exp_zero.has_deriv_at
end deriv_R_or_C
lemma complex.exp_eq_exp_ℂ : complex.exp = exp ℂ :=
begin
refine funext (λ x, _),
rw [complex.exp, exp_eq_tsum_div],
exact tendsto_nhds_unique x.exp'.tendsto_limit
(exp_series_div_summable ℝ x).has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat
end
lemma real.exp_eq_exp_ℝ : real.exp = exp ℝ :=
by { ext x, exact_mod_cast congr_fun complex.exp_eq_exp_ℂ x }
|
4ad40200bd59cdcdd9fcd3000b40f9d765c6f99e | 271e26e338b0c14544a889c31c30b39c989f2e0f | /tests/plugin/Default.lean | b4d574ce82c067c0d6630c13a0b221b1a3ae7627 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dgorokho/lean4 | 805f99b0b60c545b64ac34ab8237a8504f89d7d4 | e949a052bad59b1c7b54a82d24d516a656487d8a | refs/heads/master | 1,607,061,363,851 | 1,578,006,086,000 | 1,578,006,086,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 315 | lean | import Init.Lean
open Lean
def oh_no : Nat := 0
def snakeLinter : Linter :=
fun env n =>
-- TODO(Sebastian): return actual message with position from syntax tree
if n.toString.contains '_' then throw "SNAKES!!"
else pure MessageLog.empty
@[init]
def registerSnakeLinter : IO Unit :=
addLinter snakeLinter
|
2db4038b98d96277fe6a629faa81a8de94c8dd1c | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/group_theory/group_action/fixing_subgroup.lean | 3718d4c8ac4daf120e492c57758c0a1d21b25452 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,480 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import group_theory.subgroup.basic
import group_theory.group_action.basic
/-!
# Fixing submonoid, fixing subgroup of an action
In the presence of of an action of a monoid or a group,
this file defines the fixing submonoid or the fixing subgroup,
and relates it to the set of fixed points via a Galois connection.
## Main definitions
* `fixing_submonoid M s` : in the presence of `mul_action M α` (with `monoid M`)
it is the `submonoid M` consisting of elements which fix `s : set α` pointwise.
* `fixing_submonoid_fixed_points_gc M α` is the `galois_connection`
that relates `fixing_submonoid` with `fixed_points`.
* `fixing_subgroup M s` : in the presence of `mul_action M α` (with `group M`)
it is the `subgroup M` consisting of elements which fix `s : set α` pointwise.
* `fixing_subgroup_fixed_points_gc M α` is the `galois_connection`
that relates `fixing_subgroup` with `fixed_points`.
TODO :
* Maybe other lemmas are useful
* Treat semigroups ?
-/
section monoid
open mul_action
variables (M : Type*) {α : Type*} [monoid M] [mul_action M α]
/-- The submonoid fixing a set under a `mul_action`. -/
@[to_additive /-" The additive submonoid fixing a set under an `add_action`. "-/]
def fixing_submonoid (s : set α) : submonoid M :=
{ carrier := { ϕ : M | ∀ x : s, ϕ • (x : α) = x },
one_mem' := λ _, one_smul _ _,
mul_mem' := λ x y hx hy z, by rw [mul_smul, hy z, hx z], }
lemma mem_fixing_submonoid_iff {s : set α} {m : M} :
m ∈ fixing_submonoid M s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, m • y = y :=
⟨λ hg y hy, hg ⟨y, hy⟩, λ h ⟨y, hy⟩, h y hy⟩
variable (α)
/-- The Galois connection between fixing submonoids and fixed points of a monoid action -/
theorem fixing_submonoid_fixed_points_gc : galois_connection
(order_dual.to_dual ∘ (fixing_submonoid M))
((λ P : submonoid M, (fixed_points P α)) ∘ order_dual.of_dual) :=
λ s P, ⟨λ h s hs p, h p.2 ⟨s, hs⟩, λ h p hp s, h s.2 ⟨p, hp⟩⟩
lemma fixing_submonoid_antitone : antitone (λ (s : set α), fixing_submonoid M s) :=
(fixing_submonoid_fixed_points_gc M α).monotone_l
lemma fixed_points_antitone :
antitone (λ (P : submonoid M), fixed_points P α) :=
(fixing_submonoid_fixed_points_gc M α).monotone_u.dual_left
/-- Fixing submonoid of union is intersection -/
lemma fixing_submonoid_union {s t : set α} :
fixing_submonoid M (s ∪ t) = fixing_submonoid M s ⊓ fixing_submonoid M t :=
(fixing_submonoid_fixed_points_gc M α).l_sup
/-- Fixing submonoid of Union is intersection -/
lemma fixing_submonoid_Union {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → set α} :
fixing_submonoid M (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, fixing_submonoid M (s i) :=
(fixing_submonoid_fixed_points_gc M α).l_supr
/-- Fixed points of sup of submonoids is intersection -/
lemma fixed_points_submonoid_sup {P Q : submonoid M} :
fixed_points ↥(P ⊔ Q) α = fixed_points P α ∩ fixed_points Q α :=
(fixing_submonoid_fixed_points_gc M α).u_inf
/-- Fixed points of supr of submonoids is intersection -/
lemma fixed_points_submonoid_supr {ι : Sort*} {P : ι → submonoid M} :
fixed_points ↥(supr P) α = ⋂ i, fixed_points (P i) α :=
(fixing_submonoid_fixed_points_gc M α).u_infi
end monoid
section group
open mul_action
variables (M : Type*) {α : Type*} [group M] [mul_action M α]
/-- The subgroup fixing a set under a `mul_action`. -/
@[to_additive /-" The additive subgroup fixing a set under an `add_action`. "-/]
def fixing_subgroup (s : set α) : subgroup M :=
{ inv_mem' := λ _ hx z, by rw [inv_smul_eq_iff, hx z],
..fixing_submonoid M s, }
lemma mem_fixing_subgroup_iff {s : set α} {m : M} :
m ∈ fixing_subgroup M s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, m • y = y :=
⟨λ hg y hy, hg ⟨y, hy⟩, λ h ⟨y, hy⟩, h y hy⟩
variable (α)
/-- The Galois connection between fixing subgroups and fixed points of a group action -/
lemma fixing_subgroup_fixed_points_gc : galois_connection
(order_dual.to_dual ∘ fixing_subgroup M)
((λ P : subgroup M, fixed_points P α) ∘ order_dual.of_dual) :=
λ s P, ⟨λ h s hs p, h p.2 ⟨s, hs⟩, λ h p hp s, h s.2 ⟨p, hp⟩⟩
lemma fixing_subgroup_antitone : antitone (fixing_subgroup M : set α → subgroup M) :=
(fixing_subgroup_fixed_points_gc M α).monotone_l
lemma fixed_points_subgroup_antitone :
antitone (λ (P : subgroup M), fixed_points P α) :=
(fixing_subgroup_fixed_points_gc M α).monotone_u.dual_left
/-- Fixing subgroup of union is intersection -/
lemma fixing_subgroup_union {s t : set α} :
fixing_subgroup M (s ∪ t) = fixing_subgroup M s ⊓ fixing_subgroup M t :=
(fixing_subgroup_fixed_points_gc M α).l_sup
/-- Fixing subgroup of Union is intersection -/
lemma fixing_subgroup_Union {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → set α} :
fixing_subgroup M (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, fixing_subgroup M (s i) :=
(fixing_subgroup_fixed_points_gc M α).l_supr
/-- Fixed points of sup of subgroups is intersection -/
lemma fixed_points_subgroup_sup {P Q : subgroup M} :
fixed_points ↥(P ⊔ Q) α = fixed_points P α ∩ fixed_points Q α :=
(fixing_subgroup_fixed_points_gc M α).u_inf
/-- Fixed points of supr of subgroups is intersection -/
lemma fixed_points_subgroup_supr {ι : Sort*} {P : ι → subgroup M} :
fixed_points ↥(supr P) α = ⋂ i, fixed_points (P i) α :=
(fixing_subgroup_fixed_points_gc M α).u_infi
end group
|
fcb82dfba96e6f5d2524f2f26130111420c08615 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/category_theory/linear/yoneda.lean | 24d1ff739b222d0b7cf988873239eb03210b9e91 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,480 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.category.Module.basic
import category_theory.linear
import category_theory.preadditive.additive_functor
import category_theory.preadditive.opposite
/-!
# The Yoneda embedding for `R`-linear categories
The Yoneda embedding for `R`-linear categories `C`,
sends an object `X : C` to the `Module R`-valued presheaf on `C`,
with value on `Y : Cᵒᵖ` given by `Module.of R (unop Y ⟶ X)`.
TODO: `linear_yoneda R C` is `R`-linear.
TODO: In fact, `linear_yoneda` itself is additive and `R`-linear.
-/
open opposite
namespace category_theory
variables (R : Type*) [ring R] (C : Type*) [category C] [preadditive C] [linear R C]
/-- The Yoneda embedding for `R`-linear categories `C`,
sending an object `X : C` to the `Module R`-valued presheaf on `C`,
with value on `Y : Cᵒᵖ` given by `Module.of R (unop Y ⟶ X)`. -/
@[simps]
def linear_yoneda : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Module R :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ obj := λ Y, Module.of R (unop Y ⟶ X),
map := λ Y Y' f, linear.left_comp R _ f.unop,
map_comp' := λ _ _ _ f g, begin ext, dsimp, erw [category.assoc] end,
map_id' := λ Y, begin ext, dsimp, erw [category.id_comp] end },
map := λ X X' f, { app := λ Y, linear.right_comp R _ f } }.
instance linear_yoneda_obj_additive (X : C) : ((linear_yoneda R C).obj X).additive := {}
end category_theory
|
c67b02962efe1b2e47e39f3a9d6ecf0f603feeaa | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/number_theory/padics/padic_integers.lean | aac1d3115ce20a92e7989c5e9bed2e992846729b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,398 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import number_theory.padics.padic_numbers
import ring_theory.discrete_valuation_ring.basic
/-!
# p-adic integers
This file defines the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` as the subtype of `ℚ_[p]` with norm `≤ 1`.
We show that `ℤ_[p]`
* is complete,
* is nonarchimedean,
* is a normed ring,
* is a local ring, and
* is a discrete valuation ring.
The relation between `ℤ_[p]` and `zmod p` is established in another file.
## Important definitions
* `padic_int` : the type of `p`-adic integers
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℤ_[p]` for the `p`-adic integers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[fact p.prime]` as a type class argument.
Coercions into `ℤ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, p-adic integer
-/
open padic metric local_ring
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
/-- The `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` are the `p`-adic numbers with norm `≤ 1`. -/
def padic_int (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime] := {x : ℚ_[p] // ‖x‖ ≤ 1}
notation `ℤ_[`p`]` := padic_int p
namespace padic_int
/-! ### Ring structure and coercion to `ℚ_[p]` -/
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
instance : has_coe ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] := ⟨subtype.val⟩
lemma ext {x y : ℤ_[p]} : (x : ℚ_[p]) = y → x = y := subtype.ext
variables (p)
/-- The `p`-adic integers as a subring of `ℚ_[p]`. -/
def subring : subring (ℚ_[p]) :=
{ carrier := {x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1},
zero_mem' := by norm_num,
one_mem' := by norm_num,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy, (padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean _ _).trans $ max_le_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩,
mul_mem' := λ x y hx hy, (padic_norm_e.mul _ _).trans_le $ mul_le_one hx (norm_nonneg _) hy,
neg_mem' := λ x hx, (norm_neg _).trans_le hx }
@[simp] lemma mem_subring_iff {x : ℚ_[p]} : x ∈ subring p ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ 1 := iff.rfl
variables {p}
/-- Addition on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : has_add ℤ_[p] := (by apply_instance : has_add (subring p))
/-- Multiplication on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : has_mul ℤ_[p] := (by apply_instance : has_mul (subring p))
/-- Negation on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : has_neg ℤ_[p] := (by apply_instance : has_neg (subring p))
/-- Subtraction on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : has_sub ℤ_[p] := (by apply_instance : has_sub (subring p))
/-- Zero on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : has_zero ℤ_[p] := (by apply_instance : has_zero (subring p))
instance : inhabited ℤ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
/-- One on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : has_one ℤ_[p] := ⟨⟨1, by norm_num⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_zero {h} : (⟨0, h⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = (0 : ℤ_[p]) := rfl
@[simp] lemma val_eq_coe (z : ℤ_[p]) : z.val = z := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 + z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 + z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 * z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 * z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg (z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ((-z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = -z1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 - z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 - z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
lemma coe_eq_zero (z : ℤ_[p]) : (z : ℚ_[p]) = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
by rw [← coe_zero, subtype.coe_inj]
lemma coe_ne_zero (z : ℤ_[p]) : (z : ℚ_[p]) ≠ 0 ↔ z ≠ 0 := z.coe_eq_zero.not
instance : add_comm_group ℤ_[p] :=
(by apply_instance : add_comm_group (subring p))
instance : comm_ring ℤ_[p] :=
(by apply_instance : comm_ring (subring p))
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_int_cast (z : ℤ) : ((z : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z := rfl
/-- The coercion from `ℤ_[p]` to `ℚ_[p]` as a ring homomorphism. -/
def coe.ring_hom : ℤ_[p] →+* ℚ_[p] := (subring p).subtype
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x^n) : ℚ_[p]) = (↑x : ℚ_[p])^n := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_coe (k : ℤ_[p]) : (⟨k, k.2⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = k := subtype.coe_eta _ _
/-- The inverse of a `p`-adic integer with norm equal to `1` is also a `p`-adic integer.
Otherwise, the inverse is defined to be `0`. -/
def inv : ℤ_[p] → ℤ_[p]
| ⟨k, _⟩ := if h : ‖k‖ = 1 then ⟨k⁻¹, by simp [h]⟩ else 0
instance : char_zero ℤ_[p] :=
{ cast_injective :=
λ m n h, nat.cast_injective $
show (m:ℚ_[p]) = n, by { rw subtype.ext_iff at h, norm_cast at h, exact h } }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_int_eq (z1 z2 : ℤ) : (z1 : ℤ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 :=
suffices (z1 : ℚ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2, from iff.trans (by norm_cast) this,
by norm_cast
/-- A sequence of integers that is Cauchy with respect to the `p`-adic norm converges to a `p`-adic
integer. -/
def of_int_seq (seq : ℕ → ℤ) (h : is_cau_seq (padic_norm p) (λ n, seq n)) : ℤ_[p] :=
⟨⟦⟨_, h⟩⟧,
show ↑(padic_seq.norm _) ≤ (1 : ℝ), begin
rw padic_seq.norm,
split_ifs with hne; norm_cast,
{ exact zero_le_one },
{ apply padic_norm.of_int }
end ⟩
end padic_int
namespace padic_int
/-! ### Instances
We now show that `ℤ_[p]` is a
* complete metric space
* normed ring
* integral domain
-/
variables (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime]
instance : metric_space ℤ_[p] := subtype.metric_space
instance complete_space : complete_space ℤ_[p] :=
have is_closed {x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1}, from is_closed_le continuous_norm continuous_const,
this.complete_space_coe
instance : has_norm ℤ_[p] := ⟨λ z, ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖⟩
variables {p}
lemma norm_def {z : ℤ_[p]} : ‖z‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := rfl
variables (p)
instance : normed_comm_ring ℤ_[p] :=
{ dist_eq := λ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩, rfl,
norm_mul := by simp [norm_def],
norm := norm, .. padic_int.comm_ring, .. padic_int.metric_space p }
instance : norm_one_class ℤ_[p] := ⟨norm_def.trans norm_one⟩
instance is_absolute_value : is_absolute_value (λ z : ℤ_[p], ‖z‖) :=
{ abv_nonneg := norm_nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := λ ⟨_, _⟩, by simp [norm_eq_zero],
abv_add := λ ⟨_,_⟩ ⟨_, _⟩, norm_add_le _ _,
abv_mul := λ _ _, by simp only [norm_def, padic_norm_e.mul, padic_int.coe_mul] }
variables {p}
instance : is_domain ℤ_[p] := function.injective.is_domain (subring p).subtype subtype.coe_injective
end padic_int
namespace padic_int
/-! ### Norm -/
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
lemma norm_le_one (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z‖ ≤ 1 := z.2
@[simp] lemma norm_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z1 * z2‖ = ‖z1‖ * ‖z2‖ := by simp [norm_def]
@[simp] lemma norm_pow (z : ℤ_[p]) : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖z ^ n‖ = ‖z‖ ^ n
| 0 := by simp
| (k + 1) := by { rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, norm_mul], congr, apply norm_pow }
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℤ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max (‖q‖) (‖r‖) := padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean _ _
theorem norm_add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℤ_[p]} : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖ → ‖q+r‖ = max (‖q‖) (‖r‖) :=
padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne
lemma norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z2‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contradiction $ λ hne, not_lt_of_ge (by rw norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne; apply le_max_right) h
lemma norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z1‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contradiction $ λ hne, not_lt_of_ge (by rw norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne; apply le_max_left) h
@[simp] lemma padic_norm_e_of_padic_int (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp [norm_def]
lemma norm_int_cast_eq_padic_norm (z : ℤ) : ‖(z : ℤ_[p])‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := by simp [norm_def]
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_padic_norm {q : ℚ_[p]} (hq : ‖q‖ ≤ 1) : @norm ℤ_[p] _ ⟨q, hq⟩ = ‖q‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_p : ‖(p : ℤ_[p])‖ = p⁻¹ := padic_norm_e.norm_p
@[simp] lemma norm_p_pow (n : ℕ) : ‖(p : ℤ_[p])^n‖ = p^(-n:ℤ) := padic_norm_e.norm_p_pow n
private def cau_seq_to_rat_cau_seq (f : cau_seq ℤ_[p] norm) : cau_seq ℚ_[p] (λ a, ‖a‖) :=
⟨ λ n, f n, λ _ hε, by simpa [norm, norm_def] using f.cauchy hε ⟩
variables (p)
instance complete : cau_seq.is_complete ℤ_[p] norm :=
⟨ λ f,
have hqn : ‖cau_seq.lim (cau_seq_to_rat_cau_seq f)‖ ≤ 1,
from padic_norm_e_lim_le zero_lt_one (λ _, norm_le_one _),
⟨⟨_, hqn⟩, λ ε, by simpa [norm, norm_def] using cau_seq.equiv_lim (cau_seq_to_rat_cau_seq f) ε⟩⟩
end padic_int
namespace padic_int
variables (p : ℕ) [hp : fact p.prime]
include hp
lemma exists_pow_neg_lt {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, ↑p ^ -(k : ℤ) < ε :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹,
use k,
rw ← inv_lt_inv hε (_root_.zpow_pos_of_pos _ _),
{ rw [zpow_neg, inv_inv, zpow_coe_nat],
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hk,
norm_cast,
apply le_of_lt,
convert nat.lt_pow_self _ _ using 1,
exact hp.1.one_lt },
{ exact_mod_cast hp.1.pos }
end
lemma exists_pow_neg_lt_rat {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, ↑p ^ -(k : ℤ) < ε :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := @exists_pow_neg_lt p _ ε (by exact_mod_cast hε),
use k,
rw (show (p : ℝ) = (p : ℚ), by simp) at hk,
exact_mod_cast hk
end
variable {p}
lemma norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) : ‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ (p : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ k, by rwa norm_int_cast_eq_padic_norm,
padic_norm_e.norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd k
lemma norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd {k : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : ‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ ≤ p ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ p ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ ↑(p ^ n) ∣ k,
by simpa [norm_int_cast_eq_padic_norm], padic_norm_e.norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd _ _
/-! ### Valuation on `ℤ_[p]` -/
/-- `padic_int.valuation` lifts the `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` to `ℤ_[p]`. -/
def valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) := padic.valuation (x : ℚ_[p])
lemma norm_eq_pow_val {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ‖x‖ = (p : ℝ) ^ -x.valuation :=
begin
convert padic.norm_eq_pow_val _,
contrapose! hx,
exact subtype.val_injective hx
end
@[simp] lemma valuation_zero : valuation (0 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := padic.valuation_zero
@[simp] lemma valuation_one : valuation (1 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := padic.valuation_one
@[simp] lemma valuation_p : valuation (p : ℤ_[p]) = 1 := by simp [valuation]
lemma valuation_nonneg (x : ℤ_[p]) : 0 ≤ x.valuation :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ simp [hx] },
have h : (1 : ℝ) < p := by exact_mod_cast hp.1.one_lt,
rw [← neg_nonpos, ← (zpow_strict_mono h).le_iff_le],
show (p : ℝ) ^ -valuation x ≤ p ^ (0 : ℤ),
rw [← norm_eq_pow_val hx],
simpa using x.property
end
@[simp] lemma valuation_p_pow_mul (n : ℕ) (c : ℤ_[p]) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(↑p ^ n * c).valuation = n + c.valuation :=
begin
have : ‖(↑p ^ n * c)‖ = ‖(p ^ n : ℤ_[p])‖ * ‖c‖,
{ exact norm_mul _ _ },
have aux : (↑p ^ n * c) ≠ 0,
{ contrapose! hc, rw mul_eq_zero at hc, cases hc,
{ refine (hp.1.ne_zero _).elim,
exact_mod_cast (pow_eq_zero hc) },
{ exact hc } },
rwa [norm_eq_pow_val aux, norm_p_pow, norm_eq_pow_val hc,
← zpow_add₀, ← neg_add, zpow_inj, neg_inj] at this,
{ exact_mod_cast hp.1.pos },
{ exact_mod_cast hp.1.ne_one },
{ exact_mod_cast hp.1.ne_zero }
end
section units
/-! ### Units of `ℤ_[p]` -/
local attribute [reducible] padic_int
lemma mul_inv : ∀ {z : ℤ_[p]}, ‖z‖ = 1 → z * z.inv = 1
| ⟨k, _⟩ h :=
begin
have hk : k ≠ 0, from λ h', zero_ne_one' ℚ_[p] (by simpa [h'] using h),
unfold padic_int.inv,
rw [norm_eq_padic_norm] at h,
rw dif_pos h,
apply subtype.ext_iff_val.2,
simp [mul_inv_cancel hk]
end
lemma inv_mul {z : ℤ_[p]} (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z.inv * z = 1 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_inv hz]
lemma is_unit_iff {z : ℤ_[p]} : is_unit z ↔ ‖z‖ = 1 :=
⟨λ h, begin
rcases is_unit_iff_dvd_one.1 h with ⟨w, eq⟩,
refine le_antisymm (norm_le_one _) _,
have := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_le_one w) (norm_nonneg z),
rwa [mul_one, ← norm_mul, ← eq, norm_one] at this
end, λ h, ⟨⟨z, z.inv, mul_inv h, inv_mul h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
lemma norm_lt_one_add {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (hz1 : ‖z1‖ < 1) (hz2 : ‖z2‖ < 1) : ‖z1 + z2‖ < 1 :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nonarchimedean _ _) (max_lt hz1 hz2)
lemma norm_lt_one_mul {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (hz2 : ‖z2‖ < 1) : ‖z1 * z2‖ < 1 :=
calc ‖z1 * z2‖ = ‖z1‖ * ‖z2‖ : by simp
... < 1 : mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_right (norm_le_one _) (norm_nonneg _) hz2
@[simp] lemma mem_nonunits {z : ℤ_[p]} : z ∈ nonunits ℤ_[p] ↔ ‖z‖ < 1 :=
by rw lt_iff_le_and_ne; simp [norm_le_one z, nonunits, is_unit_iff]
/-- A `p`-adic number `u` with `‖u‖ = 1` is a unit of `ℤ_[p]`. -/
def mk_units {u : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖u‖ = 1) : ℤ_[p]ˣ :=
let z : ℤ_[p] := ⟨u, le_of_eq h⟩ in ⟨z, z.inv, mul_inv h, inv_mul h⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_units_eq {u : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖u‖ = 1) : ((mk_units h : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = u := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_units (u : ℤ_[p]ˣ) : ‖(u : ℤ_[p])‖ = 1 := is_unit_iff.mp $ by simp
/-- `unit_coeff hx` is the unit `u` in the unique representation `x = u * p ^ n`.
See `unit_coeff_spec`. -/
def unit_coeff {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ℤ_[p]ˣ :=
let u : ℚ_[p] := x * p ^ -x.valuation in
have hu : ‖u‖ = 1,
by simp [hx, nat.zpow_ne_zero_of_pos (by exact_mod_cast hp.1.pos) x.valuation,
norm_eq_pow_val, zpow_neg, inv_mul_cancel],
mk_units hu
@[simp] lemma unit_coeff_coe {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(unit_coeff hx : ℚ_[p]) = x * p ^ -x.valuation := rfl
lemma unit_coeff_spec {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
x = (unit_coeff hx : ℤ_[p]) * p ^ int.nat_abs (valuation x) :=
begin
apply subtype.coe_injective,
push_cast,
have repr : (x : ℚ_[p]) = (unit_coeff hx) * p ^ x.valuation,
{ rw [unit_coeff_coe, mul_assoc, ← zpow_add₀],
{ simp },
{ exact_mod_cast hp.1.ne_zero } },
convert repr using 2,
rw [← zpow_coe_nat, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg (valuation_nonneg x)]
end
end units
section norm_le_iff
/-! ### Various characterizations of open unit balls -/
lemma norm_le_pow_iff_le_valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) (hx : x ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
‖x‖ ≤ p ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ ↑n ≤ x.valuation :=
begin
rw norm_eq_pow_val hx,
lift x.valuation to ℕ using x.valuation_nonneg with k hk,
simp only [int.coe_nat_le, zpow_neg, zpow_coe_nat],
have aux : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < (p ^ n : ℝ),
{ apply pow_pos, exact_mod_cast hp.1.pos },
rw [inv_le_inv (aux _) (aux _)],
have : p ^ n ≤ p ^ k ↔ n ≤ k := (pow_strict_mono_right hp.1.one_lt).le_iff_le,
rw [← this],
norm_cast
end
lemma mem_span_pow_iff_le_valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) (hx : x ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
x ∈ (ideal.span {p ^ n} : ideal ℤ_[p]) ↔ ↑n ≤ x.valuation :=
begin
rw [ideal.mem_span_singleton],
split,
{ rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩,
suffices : c ≠ 0,
{ rw [valuation_p_pow_mul _ _ this, le_add_iff_nonneg_right], apply valuation_nonneg },
contrapose! hx, rw [hx, mul_zero] },
{ rw [unit_coeff_spec hx] { occs := occurrences.pos [2] },
lift x.valuation to ℕ using x.valuation_nonneg with k hk,
simp only [int.nat_abs_of_nat, units.is_unit, is_unit.dvd_mul_left, int.coe_nat_le],
intro H,
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_le H,
simp only [pow_add, dvd_mul_right] }
end
lemma norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) :
‖x‖ ≤ p ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ x ∈ (ideal.span {p ^ n} : ideal ℤ_[p]) :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ subst hx,
simp only [norm_zero, zpow_neg, zpow_coe_nat, inv_nonneg, iff_true, submodule.zero_mem],
exact_mod_cast nat.zero_le _ },
rw [norm_le_pow_iff_le_valuation x hx, mem_span_pow_iff_le_valuation x hx]
end
lemma norm_le_pow_iff_norm_lt_pow_add_one (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℤ) : ‖x‖ ≤ p ^ n ↔ ‖x‖ < p ^ (n + 1) :=
begin
rw norm_def, exact padic.norm_le_pow_iff_norm_lt_pow_add_one _ _,
end
lemma norm_lt_pow_iff_norm_le_pow_sub_one (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℤ) : ‖x‖ < p ^ n ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ p ^ (n - 1) :=
by rw [norm_le_pow_iff_norm_lt_pow_add_one, sub_add_cancel]
lemma norm_lt_one_iff_dvd (x : ℤ_[p]) : ‖x‖ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ x :=
begin
have := norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow x 1,
rw [ideal.mem_span_singleton, pow_one] at this,
rw [← this, norm_le_pow_iff_norm_lt_pow_add_one],
simp only [zpow_zero, int.coe_nat_zero, int.coe_nat_succ, add_left_neg, zero_add]
end
@[simp] lemma pow_p_dvd_int_iff (n : ℕ) (a : ℤ) : (p ^ n : ℤ_[p]) ∣ a ↔ ↑p ^ n ∣ a :=
by rw [← norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd, norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow, ideal.mem_span_singleton]
end norm_le_iff
section dvr
/-! ### Discrete valuation ring -/
instance : local_ring ℤ_[p] :=
local_ring.of_nonunits_add $ by simp only [mem_nonunits]; exact λ x y, norm_lt_one_add
lemma p_nonnunit : (p : ℤ_[p]) ∈ nonunits ℤ_[p] :=
have (p : ℝ)⁻¹ < 1, from inv_lt_one $ by exact_mod_cast hp.1.one_lt,
by simp [this]
lemma maximal_ideal_eq_span_p : maximal_ideal ℤ_[p] = ideal.span {p} :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ intros x hx,
simp only [local_ring.mem_maximal_ideal, mem_nonunits] at hx,
rwa [ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← norm_lt_one_iff_dvd] },
{ rw [ideal.span_le, set.singleton_subset_iff], exact p_nonnunit }
end
lemma prime_p : prime (p : ℤ_[p]) :=
begin
rw [← ideal.span_singleton_prime, ← maximal_ideal_eq_span_p],
{ apply_instance },
{ exact_mod_cast hp.1.ne_zero }
end
lemma irreducible_p : irreducible (p : ℤ_[p]) := prime.irreducible prime_p
instance : discrete_valuation_ring ℤ_[p] :=
discrete_valuation_ring.of_has_unit_mul_pow_irreducible_factorization
⟨p, irreducible_p, λ x hx, ⟨x.valuation.nat_abs, unit_coeff hx,
by rw [mul_comm, ← unit_coeff_spec hx]⟩⟩
lemma ideal_eq_span_pow_p {s : ideal ℤ_[p]} (hs : s ≠ ⊥) : ∃ n : ℕ, s = ideal.span {p ^ n} :=
discrete_valuation_ring.ideal_eq_span_pow_irreducible hs irreducible_p
open cau_seq
instance : is_adic_complete (maximal_ideal ℤ_[p]) ℤ_[p] :=
{ prec' := λ x hx,
begin
simp only [← ideal.one_eq_top, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, smodeq.sub_mem, maximal_ideal_eq_span_p,
ideal.span_singleton_pow, ← norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow] at hx ⊢,
let x' : cau_seq ℤ_[p] norm := ⟨x, _⟩, swap,
{ intros ε hε, obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt p hε,
refine ⟨m, λ n hn, lt_of_le_of_lt _ hm⟩, rw [← neg_sub, norm_neg], exact hx hn },
{ refine ⟨x'.lim, λ n, _⟩,
have : (0:ℝ) < p ^ (-n : ℤ), { apply zpow_pos_of_pos, exact_mod_cast hp.1.pos },
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := equiv_def₃ (equiv_lim x') this,
by_cases hin : i ≤ n,
{ exact (hi i le_rfl n hin).le },
{ push_neg at hin, specialize hi i le_rfl i le_rfl, specialize hx hin.le,
have := nonarchimedean (x n - x i) (x i - x'.lim),
rw [sub_add_sub_cancel] at this,
refine this.trans (max_le_iff.mpr ⟨hx, hi.le⟩) } }
end }
end dvr
section fraction_ring
instance algebra : algebra ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] := algebra.of_subring (subring p)
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_apply (x : ℤ_[p]) : algebra_map ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] x = x := rfl
instance is_fraction_ring : is_fraction_ring ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] :=
{ map_units := λ ⟨x, hx⟩,
by rwa [set_like.coe_mk, algebra_map_apply, is_unit_iff_ne_zero, padic_int.coe_ne_zero,
←mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero],
surj := λ x,
begin
by_cases hx : ‖ x ‖ ≤ 1,
{ use (⟨x, hx⟩, 1),
rw [submonoid.coe_one, map_one, mul_one, padic_int.algebra_map_apply, subtype.coe_mk] },
{ set n := int.to_nat(- x.valuation) with hn,
have hn_coe : (n : ℤ) = -x.valuation,
{ rw [hn, int.to_nat_of_nonneg],
rw right.nonneg_neg_iff,
rw [padic.norm_le_one_iff_val_nonneg, not_le] at hx,
exact hx.le },
set a := x * p^n with ha,
have ha_norm : ‖ a ‖ = 1,
{ have hx : x ≠ 0,
{ intro h0,
rw [h0, norm_zero] at hx,
exact hx (zero_le_one) },
rw [ha, padic_norm_e.mul, padic_norm_e.norm_p_pow,
padic.norm_eq_pow_val hx, ← zpow_add', hn_coe, neg_neg, add_left_neg, zpow_zero],
exact or.inl (nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (ne_zero.ne p)), },
use (⟨a, le_of_eq ha_norm⟩,
⟨(p^n : ℤ_[p]), mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr (ne_zero.ne _)⟩),
simp only [set_like.coe_mk, map_pow, map_nat_cast, algebra_map_apply,
padic_int.coe_pow, padic_int.coe_nat_cast, subtype.coe_mk] }
end,
eq_iff_exists := λ x y,
begin
rw [algebra_map_apply, algebra_map_apply, subtype.coe_inj],
refine ⟨λ h, ⟨1, by rw h⟩, _⟩,
rintro ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, h⟩,
exact (mul_eq_mul_left_iff.mp h).resolve_right (mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mp hc)
end }
end fraction_ring
end padic_int
|
6385c6280e3efed1fd2340bb6421d098428ea460 | 8b9f17008684d796c8022dab552e42f0cb6fb347 | /library/data/quotient/classical.lean | c3da18b1f9659bd7eb73d25307f066e48f2d437f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | chubbymaggie/lean | 0d06ae25f9dd396306fb02190e89422ea94afd7b | d2c7b5c31928c98f545b16420d37842c43b4ae9a | refs/heads/master | 1,611,313,622,901 | 1,430,266,839,000 | 1,430,267,083,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,065 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Author: Floris van Doorn
import algebra.relation data.subtype logic.axioms.classical logic.axioms.hilbert
import .basic
namespace quotient
open relation nonempty subtype
-- abstract quotient
-- -----------------
definition prelim_map {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) (a : A) :=
-- TODO: it is interesting how the elaborator fails here
-- epsilon (fun b, R a b)
@epsilon _ (nonempty.intro a) (fun b, R a b)
-- TODO: only needed R reflexive (or weaker: R a a)
theorem prelim_map_rel {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop} (H : is_equivalence R) (a : A)
: R a (prelim_map R a) :=
have reflR : reflexive R, from is_equivalence.refl R,
epsilon_spec (exists.intro a (reflR a))
-- TODO: only needed: R PER
theorem prelim_map_congr {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop} (H1 : is_equivalence R) {a b : A}
(H2 : R a b) : prelim_map R a = prelim_map R b :=
have symmR : relation.symmetric R, from is_equivalence.symm R,
have transR : relation.transitive R, from is_equivalence.trans R,
have H3 : ∀c, R a c ↔ R b c, from
take c,
iff.intro
(assume H4 : R a c, transR (symmR H2) H4)
(assume H4 : R b c, transR H2 H4),
have H4 : (fun c, R a c) = (fun c, R b c), from
funext (take c, eq.of_iff (H3 c)),
assert H5 : nonempty A, from
nonempty.intro a,
show epsilon (λc, R a c) = epsilon (λc, R b c), from
congr_arg _ H4
definition quotient {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) : Type := image (prelim_map R)
definition quotient_abs {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) : A → quotient R :=
fun_image (prelim_map R)
definition quotient_elt_of {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) : quotient R → A := elt_of
-- TODO: I had to make is_quotient transparent -- change this?
theorem quotient_is_quotient {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) (H : is_equivalence R)
: is_quotient R (quotient_abs R) (quotient_elt_of R) :=
representative_map_to_quotient_equiv
H
(prelim_map_rel H)
(@prelim_map_congr _ _ H)
end quotient
|
3d26ea3621d2b30035536a3be422d985462c5152 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/analysis/fourier/add_circle.lean | a5e5f3877cfdd75863ddf74880d3bfea2fd812bc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,747 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, David Loeffler
-/
import analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv
import analysis.special_functions.complex.circle
import analysis.inner_product_space.l2_space
import measure_theory.function.continuous_map_dense
import measure_theory.function.l2_space
import measure_theory.group.integration
import measure_theory.integral.periodic
import topology.continuous_function.stone_weierstrass
import measure_theory.integral.fund_thm_calculus
/-!
# Fourier analysis on the additive circle
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file contains basic results on Fourier series for functions on the additive circle
`add_circle T = ℝ / ℤ • T`.
## Main definitions
* `haar_add_circle`, Haar measure on `add_circle T`, normalized to have total measure `1`. (Note
that this is not the same normalisation as the standard measure defined in `integral.periodic`,
so we do not declare it as a `measure_space` instance, to avoid confusion.)
* for `n : ℤ`, `fourier n` is the monomial `λ x, exp (2 π i n x / T)`, bundled as a continuous map
from `add_circle T` to `ℂ`.
* `fourier_basis` is the Hilbert basis of `Lp ℂ 2 haar_add_circle` given by the images of the
monomials `fourier n`.
* `fourier_coeff f n`, for `f : add_circle T → E` (with `E` a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space), is
the `n`-th Fourier coefficient of `f`, defined as an integral over `add_circle T`. The lemma
`fourier_coeff_eq_interval_integral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, a + T]` for any real
`a`.
* `fourier_coeff_on`, for `f : ℝ → E` and `a < b` reals, is the `n`-th Fourier
coefficient of the unique periodic function of period `b - a` which agrees with `f` on `(a, b]`.
The lemma `fourier_coeff_on_eq_integral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, b]`.
## Main statements
The theorem `span_fourier_closure_eq_top` states that the span of the monomials `fourier n` is
dense in `C(add_circle T, ℂ)`, i.e. that its `submodule.topological_closure` is `⊤`. This follows
from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem after checking that the span is a subalgebra, is closed under
conjugation, and separates points.
Using this and general theory on approximation of Lᵖ functions by continuous functions, we deduce
(`span_fourier_Lp_closure_eq_top`) that for any `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the span of the Fourier monomials is
dense in the Lᵖ space of `add_circle T`. For `p = 2` we show (`orthonormal_fourier`) that the
monomials are also orthonormal, so they form a Hilbert basis for L², which is named as
`fourier_basis`; in particular, for `L²` functions `f`, the Fourier series of `f` converges to `f`
in the `L²` topology (`has_sum_fourier_series_L2`). Parseval's identity, `tsum_sq_fourier_coeff`, is
a direct consequence.
For continuous maps `f : add_circle T → ℂ`, the theorem
`continuous_map.has_sum_fourier_series_of_summable` states that if the sequence of Fourier
coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series `∑ (i:ℤ), f.fourier_coeff i * fourier i`
converges to `f` in the uniform-convergence topology of `C(add_circle T, ℂ)`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale ennreal complex_conjugate real
open topological_space continuous_map measure_theory measure_theory.measure algebra submodule set
variables {T : ℝ}
namespace add_circle
/-! ### Map from `add_circle` to `circle` -/
lemma scaled_exp_map_periodic :
function.periodic (λ x, exp_map_circle (2 * π / T * x)) T :=
begin
-- The case T = 0 is not interesting, but it is true, so we prove it to save hypotheses
rcases eq_or_ne T 0 with rfl | hT,
{ intro x, simp },
{ intro x, simp_rw mul_add, rw [div_mul_cancel _ hT, periodic_exp_map_circle] }
end
/-- The canonical map `λ x, exp (2 π i x / T)` from `ℝ / ℤ • T` to the unit circle in `ℂ`.
If `T = 0` we understand this as the constant function 1. -/
def to_circle : add_circle T → circle := (@scaled_exp_map_periodic T).lift
lemma to_circle_add (x : add_circle T) (y : add_circle T) :
to_circle (x + y) = to_circle x * to_circle y :=
begin
induction x using quotient_add_group.induction_on',
induction y using quotient_add_group.induction_on',
simp_rw [←quotient_add_group.coe_add, to_circle, function.periodic.lift_coe,
mul_add, exp_map_circle_add],
end
lemma continuous_to_circle : continuous (@to_circle T) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.mpr (exp_map_circle.continuous.comp $ continuous_const.mul continuous_id')
lemma injective_to_circle (hT : T ≠ 0) : function.injective (@to_circle T) :=
begin
intros a b h,
induction a using quotient_add_group.induction_on',
induction b using quotient_add_group.induction_on',
simp_rw [to_circle, function.periodic.lift_coe] at h,
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exp_map_circle_eq_exp_map_circle.mp h.symm,
simp_rw [quotient_add_group.eq, add_subgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff, zsmul_eq_mul],
use m,
field_simp [real.two_pi_pos.ne'] at hm,
rw ← mul_right_inj' real.two_pi_pos.ne',
linarith
end
/-! ### Measure on `add_circle T`
In this file we use the Haar measure on `add_circle T` normalised to have total measure 1 (which is
**not** the same as the standard measure defined in `topology.instances.add_circle`). -/
variables [hT : fact (0 < T)]
include hT
/-- Haar measure on the additive circle, normalised to have total measure 1. -/
@[derive is_add_haar_measure]
def haar_add_circle : measure (add_circle T) := add_haar_measure ⊤
instance : is_probability_measure (@haar_add_circle T _) :=
is_probability_measure.mk add_haar_measure_self
lemma volume_eq_smul_haar_add_circle :
(volume : measure (add_circle T)) = ennreal.of_real T • haar_add_circle := rfl
end add_circle
open add_circle
section monomials
/-- The family of exponential monomials `λ x, exp (2 π i n x / T)`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and
considered as bundled continuous maps from `ℝ / ℤ • T` to `ℂ`. -/
def fourier (n : ℤ) : C(add_circle T, ℂ) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, to_circle (n • x),
continuous_to_fun := continuous_induced_dom.comp $ continuous_to_circle.comp $ continuous_zsmul _}
@[simp] lemma fourier_apply {n : ℤ} {x : add_circle T} : fourier n x = to_circle (n • x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma fourier_coe_apply {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
fourier n (x : add_circle T) = complex.exp (2 * π * complex.I * n * x / T) :=
begin
rw [fourier_apply, ←quotient_add_group.coe_zsmul, to_circle, function.periodic.lift_coe,
exp_map_circle_apply, complex.of_real_mul, complex.of_real_div, complex.of_real_mul,
zsmul_eq_mul, complex.of_real_mul, complex.of_real_int_cast, complex.of_real_bit0,
complex.of_real_one],
congr' 1, ring,
end
@[simp] lemma fourier_zero {x : add_circle T} : fourier 0 x = 1 :=
begin
induction x using quotient_add_group.induction_on',
simp only [fourier_coe_apply, algebra_map.coe_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul,
zero_div, complex.exp_zero],
end
@[simp] lemma fourier_eval_zero (n : ℤ) : fourier n (0 : add_circle T) = 1 :=
by rw [←quotient_add_group.coe_zero, fourier_coe_apply, complex.of_real_zero,
mul_zero, zero_div, complex.exp_zero]
@[simp] lemma fourier_one {x : add_circle T} : fourier 1 x = to_circle x :=
by rw [fourier_apply, one_zsmul]
@[simp] lemma fourier_neg {n : ℤ} {x : add_circle T} : fourier (-n) x = conj (fourier n x) :=
begin
induction x using quotient_add_group.induction_on',
simp_rw [fourier_apply, to_circle, ←quotient_add_group.coe_zsmul,
function.periodic.lift_coe, ←coe_inv_circle_eq_conj, ←exp_map_circle_neg, neg_smul, mul_neg],
end
@[simp] lemma fourier_add {m n : ℤ} {x : add_circle T} :
fourier (m + n) x = fourier m x * fourier n x :=
by simp_rw [fourier_apply, add_zsmul, to_circle_add, coe_mul_unit_sphere]
lemma fourier_norm [fact (0 < T)] (n : ℤ) : ‖@fourier T n‖ = 1 :=
begin
rw continuous_map.norm_eq_supr_norm,
have : ∀ (x : add_circle T), ‖fourier n x‖ = 1 := λ x, abs_coe_circle _,
simp_rw this,
exact @csupr_const _ _ _ has_zero.nonempty _,
end
/-- For `n ≠ 0`, a translation by `T / 2 / n` negates the function `fourier n`. -/
lemma fourier_add_half_inv_index {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hT : 0 < T) (x : add_circle T) :
fourier n (x + ((T / 2 / n) : ℝ)) = - fourier n x :=
begin
rw [fourier_apply, zsmul_add, ←quotient_add_group.coe_zsmul, to_circle_add, coe_mul_unit_sphere],
have : (n : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by simpa using hn,
have : ((@to_circle T ((n • (T / 2 / n)) : ℝ)) : ℂ) = -1,
{ rw [zsmul_eq_mul, to_circle, function.periodic.lift_coe, exp_map_circle_apply],
replace hT := complex.of_real_ne_zero.mpr hT.ne',
convert complex.exp_pi_mul_I using 3,
field_simp, ring, },
rw this, simp,
end
/-- The subalgebra of `C(add_circle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` . -/
def fourier_subalgebra : subalgebra ℂ C(add_circle T, ℂ) := algebra.adjoin ℂ (range fourier)
/-- The subalgebra of `C(add_circle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is in fact the
linear span of these functions. -/
lemma fourier_subalgebra_coe : (@fourier_subalgebra T).to_submodule = span ℂ (range fourier) :=
begin
apply adjoin_eq_span_of_subset,
refine subset.trans _ submodule.subset_span,
intros x hx,
apply submonoid.closure_induction hx (λ _, id) ⟨0, _⟩,
{ rintros _ _ ⟨m, rfl⟩ ⟨n, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨m + n, _⟩,
ext1 z,
exact fourier_add },
{ ext1 z, exact fourier_zero }
end
/-- The subalgebra of `C(add_circle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is invariant under
complex conjugation. -/
lemma fourier_subalgebra_conj_invariant :
conj_invariant_subalgebra ((@fourier_subalgebra T).restrict_scalars ℝ) :=
begin
apply subalgebra_conj_invariant,
rintros _ ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨-n, ext (λ _, fourier_neg)⟩
end
variables [hT : fact (0 < T)]
include hT
/-- The subalgebra of `C(add_circle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ`
separates points. -/
lemma fourier_subalgebra_separates_points : (@fourier_subalgebra T).separates_points :=
begin
intros x y hxy,
refine ⟨_, ⟨fourier 1, subset_adjoin ⟨1, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, _⟩,
dsimp only, rw [fourier_one, fourier_one],
contrapose! hxy,
rw subtype.coe_inj at hxy,
exact injective_to_circle hT.elim.ne' hxy,
end
/-- The subalgebra of `C(add_circle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is dense. -/
lemma fourier_subalgebra_closure_eq_top : (@fourier_subalgebra T).topological_closure = ⊤ :=
continuous_map.subalgebra_is_R_or_C_topological_closure_eq_top_of_separates_points
fourier_subalgebra fourier_subalgebra_separates_points fourier_subalgebra_conj_invariant
/-- The linear span of the monomials `fourier n` is dense in `C(add_circle T, ℂ)`. -/
lemma span_fourier_closure_eq_top : (span ℂ (range $ @fourier T)).topological_closure = ⊤ :=
begin
rw ← fourier_subalgebra_coe,
exact congr_arg subalgebra.to_submodule fourier_subalgebra_closure_eq_top,
end
/-- The family of monomials `fourier n`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and considered as
elements of the `Lp` space of functions `add_circle T → ℂ`. -/
abbreviation fourier_Lp (p : ℝ≥0∞) [fact (1 ≤ p)] (n : ℤ) : Lp ℂ p (@haar_add_circle T hT) :=
to_Lp p haar_add_circle ℂ (fourier n)
lemma coe_fn_fourier_Lp (p : ℝ≥0∞) [fact (1 ≤ p)] (n : ℤ) :
(@fourier_Lp T hT p _ n) =ᵐ[haar_add_circle] fourier n := coe_fn_to_Lp haar_add_circle (fourier n)
/-- For each `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the linear span of the monomials `fourier n` is dense in
`Lp ℂ p haar_circle`. -/
lemma span_fourier_Lp_closure_eq_top {p : ℝ≥0∞} [fact (1 ≤ p)] (hp : p ≠ ∞) :
(span ℂ (range (@fourier_Lp T _ p _))).topological_closure = ⊤ :=
begin
convert (continuous_map.to_Lp_dense_range ℂ (@haar_add_circle T hT) hp ℂ
).topological_closure_map_submodule (span_fourier_closure_eq_top),
rw [map_span, range_comp],
simp only [continuous_linear_map.coe_coe],
end
/-- The monomials `fourier n` are an orthonormal set with respect to normalised Haar measure. -/
lemma orthonormal_fourier : orthonormal ℂ (@fourier_Lp T _ 2 _) :=
begin
rw orthonormal_iff_ite,
intros i j,
rw continuous_map.inner_to_Lp (@haar_add_circle T hT) (fourier i) (fourier j),
simp_rw [←fourier_neg, ←fourier_add],
split_ifs,
{ simp_rw [h, neg_add_self],
have : ⇑(@fourier T 0) = (λ x, 1 : (add_circle T) → ℂ),
{ ext1, exact fourier_zero },
rw [this, integral_const, measure_univ, ennreal.one_to_real, complex.real_smul,
complex.of_real_one, mul_one] },
have hij : -i + j ≠ 0,
{ rw add_comm,
exact sub_ne_zero.mpr (ne.symm h) },
convert integral_eq_zero_of_add_right_eq_neg (fourier_add_half_inv_index hij hT.elim),
exact is_add_left_invariant.is_add_right_invariant
end
end monomials
section scope_hT -- everything from here on needs `0 < T`
variables [hT : fact (0 < T)]
include hT
section fourier_coeff
variables {E : Type} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℂ E] [complete_space E]
/-- The `n`-th Fourier coefficient of a function `add_circle T → E`, for `E` a complete normed
`ℂ`-vector space, defined as the integral over `add_circle T` of `fourier (-n) t • f t`. -/
def fourier_coeff (f : add_circle T → E) (n : ℤ) : E :=
∫ (t : add_circle T), fourier (-n) t • f t ∂ haar_add_circle
/-- The Fourier coefficients of a function on `add_circle T` can be computed as an integral
over `[a, a + T]`, for any real `a`. -/
lemma fourier_coeff_eq_interval_integral (f : add_circle T → E) (n : ℤ) (a : ℝ) :
fourier_coeff f n = (1 / T) • ∫ x in a .. a + T, @fourier T (-n) x • f x :=
begin
have : ∀ (x : ℝ), @fourier T (-n) x • f x = (λ (z : add_circle T), @fourier T (-n) z • f z) x,
{ intro x, refl, },
simp_rw this,
rw [fourier_coeff, add_circle.interval_integral_preimage T a,
volume_eq_smul_haar_add_circle, integral_smul_measure, ennreal.to_real_of_real hT.out.le,
←smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hT.out.ne', one_smul],
end
lemma fourier_coeff.const_smul (f : add_circle T → E) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourier_coeff (c • f) n = c • fourier_coeff f n :=
by simp_rw [fourier_coeff, pi.smul_apply, ←smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, ←smul_eq_mul,
smul_assoc, integral_smul]
lemma fourier_coeff.const_mul (f : add_circle T → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourier_coeff (λ x, c * f x) n = c * fourier_coeff f n :=
fourier_coeff.const_smul f c n
omit hT
/-- For a function on `ℝ`, the Fourier coefficients of `f` on `[a, b]` are defined as the
Fourier coefficients of the unique periodic function agreeing with `f` on `Ioc a b`. -/
def fourier_coeff_on {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℤ) : E :=
begin
haveI := fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a),
exact fourier_coeff (add_circle.lift_Ioc (b - a) a f) n
end
lemma fourier_coeff_on_eq_integral {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourier_coeff_on hab f n =
(1 / (b - a)) • ∫ x in a ..b, fourier (-n) (x : add_circle (b - a)) • f x :=
begin
rw [fourier_coeff_on, fourier_coeff_eq_interval_integral _ _ a],
congr' 1,
rw [add_sub, add_sub_cancel'],
simp_rw interval_integral.integral_of_le hab.le,
refine set_integral_congr measurable_set_Ioc (λ x hx, _),
dsimp only,
rwa [lift_Ioc_coe_apply],
rwa [add_sub, add_sub_cancel'],
end
lemma fourier_coeff_on.const_smul {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourier_coeff_on hab (c • f) n = c • fourier_coeff_on hab f n :=
by apply fourier_coeff.const_smul
lemma fourier_coeff_on.const_mul {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourier_coeff_on hab (λ x, c * f x) n = c * fourier_coeff_on hab f n :=
fourier_coeff_on.const_smul _ _ _ _
include hT
lemma fourier_coeff_lift_Ioc_eq {a : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourier_coeff (add_circle.lift_Ioc T a f) n =
fourier_coeff_on (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out) f n :=
begin
rw [fourier_coeff_on_eq_integral, fourier_coeff_eq_interval_integral, add_sub_cancel' a T],
congr' 1,
refine interval_integral.integral_congr_ae (ae_of_all _ (λ x hx, _)),
rw lift_Ioc_coe_apply,
rwa uIoc_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out).le at hx,
end
lemma fourier_coeff_lift_Ico_eq {a : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourier_coeff (add_circle.lift_Ico T a f) n =
fourier_coeff_on (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out) f n :=
begin
rw [fourier_coeff_on_eq_integral, fourier_coeff_eq_interval_integral _ _ a, add_sub_cancel' a T],
congr' 1,
simp_rw [interval_integral.integral_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out).le,
integral_Ioc_eq_integral_Ioo],
refine set_integral_congr measurable_set_Ioo (λ x hx, _),
dsimp only,
rw lift_Ico_coe_apply (Ioo_subset_Ico_self hx),
end
end fourier_coeff
section fourier_L2
/-- We define `fourier_basis` to be a `ℤ`-indexed Hilbert basis for `Lp ℂ 2 haar_add_circle`,
which by definition is an isometric isomorphism from `Lp ℂ 2 haar_add_circle` to `ℓ²(ℤ, ℂ)`. -/
def fourier_basis : hilbert_basis ℤ ℂ (Lp ℂ 2 $ @haar_add_circle T hT) :=
hilbert_basis.mk orthonormal_fourier (span_fourier_Lp_closure_eq_top (by norm_num)).ge
/-- The elements of the Hilbert basis `fourier_basis` are the functions `fourier_Lp 2`, i.e. the
monomials `fourier n` on the circle considered as elements of `L²`. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_fourier_basis : ⇑(@fourier_basis _ hT) = fourier_Lp 2 := hilbert_basis.coe_mk _ _
/-- Under the isometric isomorphism `fourier_basis` from `Lp ℂ 2 haar_circle` to `ℓ²(ℤ, ℂ)`, the
`i`-th coefficient is `fourier_coeff f i`, i.e., the integral over `add_circle T` of
`λ t, fourier (-i) t * f t` with respect to the Haar measure of total mass 1. -/
lemma fourier_basis_repr (f : Lp ℂ 2 $ @haar_add_circle T hT) (i : ℤ) :
fourier_basis.repr f i = fourier_coeff f i :=
begin
transitivity ∫ (t : add_circle T),
conj (((@fourier_Lp T hT 2 _ i) : add_circle T → ℂ) t) * f t ∂ haar_add_circle,
{ simp [fourier_basis.repr_apply_apply f i, measure_theory.L2.inner_def] },
{ apply integral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [coe_fn_fourier_Lp 2 i] with _ ht,
rw [ht, ←fourier_neg, smul_eq_mul], }
end
/-- The Fourier series of an `L2` function `f` sums to `f`, in the `L²` space of `add_circle T`. -/
lemma has_sum_fourier_series_L2 (f : Lp ℂ 2 $ @haar_add_circle T hT) :
has_sum (λ i, fourier_coeff f i • fourier_Lp 2 i) f :=
by { simp_rw ←fourier_basis_repr, simpa using hilbert_basis.has_sum_repr fourier_basis f }
/-- **Parseval's identity**: for an `L²` function `f` on `add_circle T`, the sum of the squared
norms of the Fourier coefficients equals the `L²` norm of `f`. -/
lemma tsum_sq_fourier_coeff (f : Lp ℂ 2 $ @haar_add_circle T hT) :
∑' i : ℤ, ‖fourier_coeff f i‖ ^ 2 = ∫ (t : add_circle T), ‖f t‖ ^ 2 ∂ haar_add_circle :=
begin
simp_rw ←fourier_basis_repr,
have H₁ : ‖fourier_basis.repr f‖ ^ 2 = ∑' i, ‖fourier_basis.repr f i‖ ^ 2,
{ exact_mod_cast lp.norm_rpow_eq_tsum _ (fourier_basis.repr f),
norm_num },
have H₂ : ‖fourier_basis.repr f‖ ^ 2 = ‖f‖ ^ 2 := by simp,
have H₃ := congr_arg is_R_or_C.re (@L2.inner_def (add_circle T) ℂ ℂ _ _ _ _ _ f f),
rw ← integral_re at H₃,
{ simp only [← norm_sq_eq_inner] at H₃,
rw [← H₁, H₂, H₃], },
{ exact L2.integrable_inner f f },
end
end fourier_L2
section convergence
variables (f : C(add_circle T, ℂ))
lemma fourier_coeff_to_Lp (n : ℤ) :
fourier_coeff (to_Lp 2 haar_add_circle ℂ f) n = fourier_coeff f n :=
integral_congr_ae (filter.eventually_eq.mul
(filter.eventually_of_forall (by tauto))
(continuous_map.coe_fn_to_ae_eq_fun haar_add_circle f))
variables {f}
/-- If the sequence of Fourier coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series converges
uniformly to `f`. -/
lemma has_sum_fourier_series_of_summable (h : summable (fourier_coeff f)) :
has_sum (λ i, fourier_coeff f i • fourier i) f :=
begin
have sum_L2 := has_sum_fourier_series_L2 (to_Lp 2 haar_add_circle ℂ f),
simp_rw fourier_coeff_to_Lp at sum_L2,
refine continuous_map.has_sum_of_has_sum_Lp (summable_of_summable_norm _) sum_L2,
simp_rw [norm_smul, fourier_norm, mul_one, summable_norm_iff],
exact h,
end
/-- If the sequence of Fourier coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series of `f`
converges everywhere pointwise to `f`. -/
lemma has_pointwise_sum_fourier_series_of_summable
(h : summable (fourier_coeff f)) (x : add_circle T) :
has_sum (λ i, fourier_coeff f i • fourier i x) (f x) :=
(continuous_map.eval_clm ℂ x).has_sum (has_sum_fourier_series_of_summable h)
end convergence
end scope_hT
section deriv
open complex interval_integral
open_locale interval
variables (T)
lemma has_deriv_at_fourier (n : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at (λ y:ℝ, fourier n (y : add_circle T))
(2 * π * I * n / T * fourier n (x : add_circle T)) x :=
begin
simp_rw [fourier_coe_apply],
refine (_ : has_deriv_at (λ y, exp (2 * π * I * n * y / T)) _ _).comp_of_real,
rw (λ α β, by ring : ∀ (α β : ℂ), α * exp β = exp β * α),
refine (has_deriv_at_exp _).comp x _,
convert has_deriv_at_mul_const (2 * ↑π * I * ↑n / T),
ext1 y, ring,
end
lemma has_deriv_at_fourier_neg (n : ℤ) (x : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ y:ℝ, fourier (-n) (y : add_circle T))
(-2 * π * I * n / T * fourier (-n) (x : add_circle T)) x :=
by simpa using has_deriv_at_fourier T (-n) x
variables {T}
lemma has_antideriv_at_fourier_neg (hT : fact (0 < T)) {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
has_deriv_at (λ (y : ℝ), (T : ℂ) / (-2 * π * I * n) * fourier (-n) (y : add_circle T))
(fourier (-n) (x : add_circle T)) x :=
begin
convert (has_deriv_at_fourier_neg T n x).div_const (-2 * π * I * n / T) using 1,
{ ext1 y, rw div_div_eq_mul_div, ring, },
{ rw mul_div_cancel_left,
simp only [ne.def, div_eq_zero_iff, neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, bit0_eq_zero, one_ne_zero,
of_real_eq_zero, false_or, int.cast_eq_zero, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨⟨⟨real.pi_ne_zero, I_ne_zero⟩, hn⟩, hT.out.ne'⟩ },
end
/-- Express Fourier coefficients of `f` on an interval in terms of those of its derivative. -/
lemma fourier_coeff_on_of_has_deriv_at {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) {f f' : ℝ → ℂ} {n : ℤ}
(hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ x, x ∈ [a, b] → has_deriv_at f (f' x) x)
(hf' : interval_integrable f' volume a b) :
fourier_coeff_on hab f n =
1 / (-2 * π * I * n) * (fourier (-n) (a : add_circle (b - a)) * (f b - f a)
- (b - a) * fourier_coeff_on hab f' n) :=
begin
rw ←of_real_sub,
have hT : fact (0 < b - a) := ⟨by linarith⟩,
simp_rw [fourier_coeff_on_eq_integral, smul_eq_mul, real_smul, of_real_div, of_real_one],
conv { for (fourier _ _ * _) [1, 2, 3] { rw mul_comm } },
rw integral_mul_deriv_eq_deriv_mul hf (λ x hx, has_antideriv_at_fourier_neg hT hn x) hf'
(((map_continuous (fourier (-n))).comp (add_circle.continuous_mk' _)).interval_integrable _ _),
dsimp only,
have : ∀ (u v w : ℂ), u * ( (b - a : ℝ) / v * w) = (b - a : ℝ) / v * (u * w) := by {intros, ring},
conv in (interval_integral _ _ _ _) { congr, funext, rw this, },
rw (by ring : ((b - a : ℝ) : ℂ) / ((-2) * π * I * n)
= ((b - a : ℝ) : ℂ) * (1 / ((-2) * π * I * n))),
have s2 : (b : add_circle (b - a)) = (a : add_circle (b - a)),
{ simpa using coe_add_period (b - a) a, },
rw [s2, integral_const_mul, ←sub_mul, mul_sub, mul_sub],
congr' 1,
{ conv_lhs {rw [mul_comm, mul_div, mul_one]},
rw [div_eq_iff (of_real_ne_zero.mpr hT.out.ne')],
ring, },
{ ring, },
end
end deriv
|
557813db16b7380e4ff9324b379216bdd24b68ac | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /src/Lean/Elab/PatternVar.lean | e91dfead6da775f8c52ffba216ecbfcc83af9af0 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,850 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Match.MatchPatternAttr
import Lean.Elab.Arg
import Lean.Elab.MatchAltView
namespace Lean.Elab.Term
open Meta
inductive PatternVar where
| localVar (userName : Name)
-- anonymous variables (`_`) are encoded using metavariables
| anonymousVar (mvarId : MVarId)
instance : ToString PatternVar := ⟨fun
| PatternVar.localVar x => toString x
| PatternVar.anonymousVar mvarId => s!"?m{mvarId.name}"⟩
/--
Create an auxiliary Syntax node wrapping a fresh metavariable id.
We use this kind of Syntax for representing `_` occurring in patterns.
The metavariables are created before we elaborate the patterns into `Expr`s. -/
private def mkMVarSyntax : TermElabM Syntax := do
let mvarId ← mkFreshId
return mkNode `MVarWithIdKind #[mkNode mvarId #[]]
/-- Given a syntax node constructed using `mkMVarSyntax`, return its MVarId -/
def getMVarSyntaxMVarId (stx : Syntax) : MVarId :=
{ name := stx[0].getKind }
/-
Patterns define new local variables.
This module collect them and preprocess `_` occurring in patterns.
Recall that an `_` may represent anonymous variables or inaccessible terms
that are implied by typing constraints. Thus, we represent them with fresh named holes `?x`.
After we elaborate the pattern, if the metavariable remains unassigned, we transform it into
a regular pattern variable. Otherwise, it becomes an inaccessible term.
Macros occurring in patterns are expanded before the `collectPatternVars` method is executed.
The following kinds of Syntax are handled by this module
- Constructor applications
- Applications of functions tagged with the `[matchPattern]` attribute
- Identifiers
- Anonymous constructors
- Structure instances
- Inaccessible terms
- Named patterns
- Tuple literals
- Type ascriptions
- Literals: num, string and char
-/
namespace CollectPatternVars
structure State where
found : NameSet := {}
vars : Array PatternVar := #[]
abbrev M := StateRefT State TermElabM
private def throwCtorExpected {α} : M α :=
throwError "invalid pattern, constructor or constant marked with '[matchPattern]' expected"
private def getNumExplicitCtorParams (ctorVal : ConstructorVal) : TermElabM Nat :=
forallBoundedTelescope ctorVal.type ctorVal.numParams fun ps _ => do
let mut result := 0
for p in ps do
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl p.fvarId!
if localDecl.binderInfo.isExplicit then
result := result+1
pure result
private def throwInvalidPattern {α} : M α :=
throwError "invalid pattern"
/-
An application in a pattern can be
1- A constructor application
The elaborator assumes fields are accessible and inductive parameters are not accessible.
2- A regular application `(f ...)` where `f` is tagged with `[matchPattern]`.
The elaborator assumes implicit arguments are not accessible and explicit ones are accessible.
-/
structure Context where
funId : Syntax
ctorVal? : Option ConstructorVal -- It is `some`, if constructor application
explicit : Bool
ellipsis : Bool
paramDecls : Array (Name × BinderInfo) -- parameters names and binder information
paramDeclIdx : Nat := 0
namedArgs : Array NamedArg
args : List Arg
newArgs : Array Syntax := #[]
deriving Inhabited
private def isDone (ctx : Context) : Bool :=
ctx.paramDeclIdx ≥ ctx.paramDecls.size
private def finalize (ctx : Context) : M Syntax := do
if ctx.namedArgs.isEmpty && ctx.args.isEmpty then
let fStx ← `(@$(ctx.funId):ident)
return Syntax.mkApp fStx ctx.newArgs
else
throwError "too many arguments"
private def isNextArgAccessible (ctx : Context) : Bool :=
let i := ctx.paramDeclIdx
match ctx.ctorVal? with
| some ctorVal => i ≥ ctorVal.numParams -- For constructor applications only fields are accessible
| none =>
if h : i < ctx.paramDecls.size then
-- For `[matchPattern]` applications, only explicit parameters are accessible.
let d := ctx.paramDecls.get ⟨i, h⟩
d.2.isExplicit
else
false
private def getNextParam (ctx : Context) : (Name × BinderInfo) × Context :=
let i := ctx.paramDeclIdx
let d := ctx.paramDecls[i]
(d, { ctx with paramDeclIdx := ctx.paramDeclIdx + 1 })
private def processVar (idStx : Syntax) : M Syntax := do
unless idStx.isIdent do
throwErrorAt idStx "identifier expected"
let id := idStx.getId
unless id.eraseMacroScopes.isAtomic do
throwError "invalid pattern variable, must be atomic"
if (← get).found.contains id then
throwError "invalid pattern, variable '{id}' occurred more than once"
modify fun s => { s with vars := s.vars.push (PatternVar.localVar id), found := s.found.insert id }
return idStx
private def nameToPattern : Name → TermElabM Syntax
| Name.anonymous => `(Name.anonymous)
| Name.str p s _ => do let p ← nameToPattern p; `(Name.str $p $(quote s) _)
| Name.num p n _ => do let p ← nameToPattern p; `(Name.num $p $(quote n) _)
private def quotedNameToPattern (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax :=
match stx[0].isNameLit? with
| some val => nameToPattern val
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
private def doubleQuotedNameToPattern (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax := do
nameToPattern (← resolveGlobalConstNoOverloadWithInfo stx[2])
partial def collect (stx : Syntax) : M Syntax := withRef stx <| withFreshMacroScope do
let k := stx.getKind
if k == identKind then
processId stx
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.app then
processCtorApp stx
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.anonymousCtor then
let elems ← stx[1].getArgs.mapSepElemsM collect
return stx.setArg 1 <| mkNullNode elems
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.structInst then
/-
```
leading_parser "{" >> optional (atomic (termParser >> " with "))
>> manyIndent (group (structInstField >> optional ", "))
>> optional ".."
>> optional (" : " >> termParser)
>> " }"
```
-/
let withMod := stx[1]
unless withMod.isNone do
throwErrorAt withMod "invalid struct instance pattern, 'with' is not allowed in patterns"
let fields ← stx[2].getArgs.mapM fun p => do
-- p is of the form (group (structInstField >> optional ", "))
let field := p[0]
-- leading_parser structInstLVal >> " := " >> termParser
let newVal ← collect field[2]
let field := field.setArg 2 newVal
pure <| field.setArg 0 field
return stx.setArg 2 <| mkNullNode fields
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.hole then
let r ← mkMVarSyntax
modify fun s => { s with vars := s.vars.push <| PatternVar.anonymousVar <| getMVarSyntaxMVarId r }
return r
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.paren then
let arg := stx[1]
if arg.isNone then
return stx -- `()`
else
let t := arg[0]
let s := arg[1]
if s.isNone || s[0].getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.typeAscription then
-- Ignore `s`, since it empty or it is a type ascription
let t ← collect t
let arg := arg.setArg 0 t
return stx.setArg 1 arg
else
return stx
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.explicitUniv then
processCtor stx[0]
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.namedPattern then
/- Recall that
def namedPattern := check... >> trailing_parser "@" >> termParser -/
let id := stx[0]
discard <| processVar id
let pat := stx[2]
let pat ← collect pat
`(_root_.namedPattern $id $pat)
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.binop then
let lhs ← collect stx[2]
let rhs ← collect stx[3]
return stx.setArg 2 lhs |>.setArg 3 rhs
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.inaccessible then
return stx
else if k == strLitKind then
return stx
else if k == numLitKind then
return stx
else if k == scientificLitKind then
return stx
else if k == charLitKind then
return stx
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName then
/- Quoted names have an elaboration function associated with them, and they will not be macro expanded.
Note that macro expansion is not a good option since it produces a term using the smart constructors `Name.mkStr`, `Name.mkNum`
instead of the constructors `Name.str` and `Name.num` -/
quotedNameToPattern stx
else if k == ``Lean.Parser.Term.doubleQuotedName then
/- Similar to previous case -/
doubleQuotedNameToPattern stx
else if k == choiceKind then
throwError "invalid pattern, notation is ambiguous"
else
throwInvalidPattern
where
processCtorApp (stx : Syntax) : M Syntax := do
let (f, namedArgs, args, ellipsis) ← expandApp stx true
processCtorAppCore f namedArgs args ellipsis
processCtor (stx : Syntax) : M Syntax := do
processCtorAppCore stx #[] #[] false
/- Check whether `stx` is a pattern variable or constructor-like (i.e., constructor or constant tagged with `[matchPattern]` attribute) -/
processId (stx : Syntax) : M Syntax := do
match (← resolveId? stx "pattern" (withInfo := true)) with
| none => processVar stx
| some f => match f with
| Expr.const fName _ _ =>
match (← getEnv).find? fName with
| some (ConstantInfo.ctorInfo _) => processCtor stx
| some _ =>
if hasMatchPatternAttribute (← getEnv) fName then
processCtor stx
else
processVar stx
| none => throwCtorExpected
| _ => processVar stx
pushNewArg (accessible : Bool) (ctx : Context) (arg : Arg) : M Context := do
match arg with
| Arg.stx stx =>
let stx ← if accessible then collect stx else pure stx
return { ctx with newArgs := ctx.newArgs.push stx }
| _ => unreachable!
processExplicitArg (accessible : Bool) (ctx : Context) : M Context := do
match ctx.args with
| [] =>
if ctx.ellipsis then
pushNewArg accessible ctx (Arg.stx (← `(_)))
else
throwError "explicit parameter is missing, unused named arguments {ctx.namedArgs.map fun narg => narg.name}"
| arg::args =>
pushNewArg accessible { ctx with args := args } arg
processImplicitArg (accessible : Bool) (ctx : Context) : M Context := do
if ctx.explicit then
processExplicitArg accessible ctx
else
pushNewArg accessible ctx (Arg.stx (← `(_)))
processCtorAppContext (ctx : Context) : M Syntax := do
if isDone ctx then
finalize ctx
else
let accessible := isNextArgAccessible ctx
let (d, ctx) := getNextParam ctx
match ctx.namedArgs.findIdx? fun namedArg => namedArg.name == d.1 with
| some idx =>
let arg := ctx.namedArgs[idx]
let ctx := { ctx with namedArgs := ctx.namedArgs.eraseIdx idx }
let ctx ← pushNewArg accessible ctx arg.val
processCtorAppContext ctx
| none =>
let ctx ← match d.2 with
| BinderInfo.implicit => processImplicitArg accessible ctx
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => processImplicitArg accessible ctx
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => processImplicitArg accessible ctx
| _ => processExplicitArg accessible ctx
processCtorAppContext ctx
processCtorAppCore (f : Syntax) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg) (ellipsis : Bool) : M Syntax := do
let args := args.toList
let (fId, explicit) ← match f with
| `($fId:ident) => pure (fId, false)
| `(@$fId:ident) => pure (fId, true)
| _ => throwError "identifier expected"
let some (Expr.const fName _ _) ← resolveId? fId "pattern" (withInfo := true) | throwCtorExpected
let fInfo ← getConstInfo fName
let paramDecls ← forallTelescopeReducing fInfo.type fun xs _ => xs.mapM fun x => do
let d ← getFVarLocalDecl x
return (d.userName, d.binderInfo)
match fInfo with
| ConstantInfo.ctorInfo val =>
processCtorAppContext
{ funId := fId, explicit := explicit, ctorVal? := val, paramDecls := paramDecls, namedArgs := namedArgs, args := args, ellipsis := ellipsis }
| _ =>
if hasMatchPatternAttribute (← getEnv) fName then
processCtorAppContext
{ funId := fId, explicit := explicit, ctorVal? := none, paramDecls := paramDecls, namedArgs := namedArgs, args := args, ellipsis := ellipsis }
else
throwCtorExpected
def main (alt : MatchAltView) : M MatchAltView := do
let patterns ← alt.patterns.mapM fun p => do
trace[Elab.match] "collecting variables at pattern: {p}"
collect p
return { alt with patterns := patterns }
end CollectPatternVars
def collectPatternVars (alt : MatchAltView) : TermElabM (Array PatternVar × MatchAltView) := do
let (alt, s) ← (CollectPatternVars.main alt).run {}
return (s.vars, alt)
/- Return the pattern variables in the given pattern.
Remark: this method is not used by the main `match` elaborator, but in the precheck hook and other macros (e.g., at `Do.lean`). -/
def getPatternVars (patternStx : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array PatternVar) := do
let patternStx ← liftMacroM <| expandMacros patternStx
let (_, s) ← (CollectPatternVars.collect patternStx).run {}
return s.vars
def getPatternsVars (patterns : Array Syntax) : TermElabM (Array PatternVar) := do
let collect : CollectPatternVars.M Unit := do
for pattern in patterns do
discard <| CollectPatternVars.collect (← liftMacroM <| expandMacros pattern)
let (_, s) ← collect.run {}
return s.vars
def getPatternVarNames (pvars : Array PatternVar) : Array Name :=
pvars.filterMap fun
| PatternVar.localVar x => some x
| _ => none
end Lean.Elab.Term
|
0e821e744f8cc621d643b76dd15b56fb5fb04d8c | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/set_theory/ordinal/notation.lean | 606e136c196b79ace5e926a91b05c6711c25a4ef | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 45,116 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import set_theory.ordinal.principal
/-!
# Ordinal notation
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Constructive ordinal arithmetic for ordinals below `ε₀`.
We define a type `onote`, with constructors `0 : onote` and `onote.oadd e n a` representing
`ω ^ e * n + a`.
We say that `o` is in Cantor normal form - `onote.NF o` - if either `o = 0` or
`o = ω ^ e * n + a` with `a < ω ^ e` and `a` in Cantor normal form.
The type `nonote` is the type of ordinals below `ε₀` in Cantor normal form.
Various operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, power function)
are defined on `onote` and `nonote`.
-/
open ordinal order
open_locale ordinal -- get notation for `ω`
/-- Recursive definition of an ordinal notation. `zero` denotes the
ordinal 0, and `oadd e n a` is intended to refer to `ω^e * n + a`.
For this to be valid Cantor normal form, we must have the exponents
decrease to the right, but we can't state this condition until we've
defined `repr`, so it is a separate definition `NF`. -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive onote : Type
| zero : onote
| oadd : onote → ℕ+ → onote → onote
namespace onote
/-- Notation for 0 -/
instance : has_zero onote := ⟨zero⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_def : zero = 0 := rfl
instance : inhabited onote := ⟨0⟩
/-- Notation for 1 -/
instance : has_one onote := ⟨oadd 0 1 0⟩
/-- Notation for ω -/
def omega : onote := oadd 1 1 0
/-- The ordinal denoted by a notation -/
@[simp] noncomputable def repr : onote → ordinal.{0}
| 0 := 0
| (oadd e n a) := ω ^ repr e * n + repr a
/-- Auxiliary definition to print an ordinal notation -/
def to_string_aux1 (e : onote) (n : ℕ) (s : string) : string :=
if e = 0 then _root_.to_string n else
(if e = 1 then "ω" else "ω^(" ++ s ++ ")") ++
if n = 1 then "" else "*" ++ _root_.to_string n
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def to_string : onote → string
| zero := "0"
| (oadd e n 0) := to_string_aux1 e n (to_string e)
| (oadd e n a) := to_string_aux1 e n (to_string e) ++ " + " ++ to_string a
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def repr' : onote → string
| zero := "0"
| (oadd e n a) := "(oadd " ++ repr' e ++ " " ++ _root_.to_string (n:ℕ) ++ " " ++ repr' a ++ ")"
instance : has_to_string onote := ⟨to_string⟩
instance : has_repr onote := ⟨repr'⟩
instance : preorder onote :=
{ le := λ x y, repr x ≤ repr y,
lt := λ x y, repr x < repr y,
le_refl := λ a, @le_refl ordinal _ _,
le_trans := λ a b c, @le_trans ordinal _ _ _ _,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ a b, @lt_iff_le_not_le ordinal _ _ _ }
theorem lt_def {x y : onote} : x < y ↔ repr x < repr y := iff.rfl
theorem le_def {x y : onote} : x ≤ y ↔ repr x ≤ repr y := iff.rfl
/-- Convert a `nat` into an ordinal -/
@[simp] def of_nat : ℕ → onote
| 0 := 0
| (nat.succ n) := oadd 0 n.succ_pnat 0
@[simp] theorem of_nat_one : of_nat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem repr_of_nat (n : ℕ) : repr (of_nat n) = n :=
by cases n; simp
@[simp] theorem repr_one : repr 1 = 1 :=
by simpa using repr_of_nat 1
theorem omega_le_oadd (e n a) : ω ^ repr e ≤ repr (oadd e n a) :=
begin
unfold repr,
refine le_trans _ (le_add_right _ _),
simpa using (mul_le_mul_iff_left $ opow_pos (repr e) omega_pos).2 (nat_cast_le.2 n.2)
end
theorem oadd_pos (e n a) : 0 < oadd e n a :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ _ _ (opow_pos _ omega_pos)
(omega_le_oadd _ _ _)
/-- Compare ordinal notations -/
def cmp : onote → onote → ordering
| 0 0 := ordering.eq
| _ 0 := ordering.gt
| 0 _ := ordering.lt
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) :=
(cmp e₁ e₂).or_else $ (_root_.cmp (n₁:ℕ) n₂).or_else (cmp a₁ a₂)
theorem eq_of_cmp_eq : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, cmp o₁ o₂ = ordering.eq → o₁ = o₂
| 0 0 h := rfl
| (oadd e n a) 0 h := by injection h
| 0 (oadd e n a) h := by injection h
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) h := begin
revert h, simp only [cmp],
cases h₁ : cmp e₁ e₂; intro h; try {cases h},
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h₁,
revert h, cases h₂ : _root_.cmp (n₁:ℕ) n₂; intro h; try {cases h},
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h,
rw [_root_.cmp, cmp_using_eq_eq] at h₂,
obtain rfl := subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp h₂),
simp
end
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : onote) < 1 :=
by rw [lt_def, repr, repr_one]; exact zero_lt_one
/-- `NF_below o b` says that `o` is a normal form ordinal notation
satisfying `repr o < ω ^ b`. -/
inductive NF_below : onote → ordinal.{0} → Prop
| zero {b} : NF_below 0 b
| oadd' {e n a eb b} : NF_below e eb →
NF_below a (repr e) → repr e < b → NF_below (oadd e n a) b
/-- A normal form ordinal notation has the form
ω ^ a₁ * n₁ + ω ^ a₂ * n₂ + ... ω ^ aₖ * nₖ
where `a₁ > a₂ > ... > aₖ` and all the `aᵢ` are
also in normal form.
We will essentially only be interested in normal form
ordinal notations, but to avoid complicating the algorithms
we define everything over general ordinal notations and
only prove correctness with normal form as an invariant. -/
class NF (o : onote) : Prop := (out : Exists (NF_below o))
attribute [pp_nodot] NF
instance NF.zero : NF 0 := ⟨⟨0, NF_below.zero⟩⟩
theorem NF_below.oadd {e n a b} : NF e →
NF_below a (repr e) → repr e < b → NF_below (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨eb, h⟩⟩ := NF_below.oadd' h
theorem NF_below.fst {e n a b} (h : NF_below (oadd e n a) b) : NF e :=
by cases h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
theorem NF.fst {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF e
| ⟨⟨b, h⟩⟩ := h.fst
theorem NF_below.snd {e n a b} (h : NF_below (oadd e n a) b) : NF_below a (repr e) :=
by cases h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₂
theorem NF.snd' {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF_below a (repr e)
| ⟨⟨b, h⟩⟩ := h.snd
theorem NF.snd {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) : NF a :=
⟨⟨_, h.snd'⟩⟩
theorem NF.oadd {e a} (h₁ : NF e) (n)
(h₂ : NF_below a (repr e)) : NF (oadd e n a) :=
⟨⟨_, NF_below.oadd h₁ h₂ (lt_succ _)⟩⟩
instance NF.oadd_zero (e n) [h : NF e] : NF (oadd e n 0) :=
h.oadd _ NF_below.zero
theorem NF_below.lt {e n a b} (h : NF_below (oadd e n a) b) : repr e < b :=
by cases h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₃
theorem NF_below_zero : ∀ {o}, NF_below o 0 ↔ o = 0
| 0 := ⟨λ _, rfl, λ _, NF_below.zero⟩
| (oadd e n a) := ⟨λ h, (not_le_of_lt h.lt).elim (ordinal.zero_le _),
λ e, e.symm ▸ NF_below.zero⟩
theorem NF.zero_of_zero {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) (e0 : e = 0) : a = 0 :=
by simpa [e0, NF_below_zero] using h.snd'
theorem NF_below.repr_lt {o b} (h : NF_below o b) : repr o < ω ^ b :=
begin
induction h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ IH,
{ exact opow_pos _ omega_pos },
{ rw repr,
apply ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 IH).trans_le,
rw ← mul_succ,
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) _).trans,
rw ← opow_succ,
exact opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (succ_le_of_lt h₃) }
end
theorem NF_below.mono {o b₁ b₂} (bb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h : NF_below o b₁) : NF_below o b₂ :=
begin
induction h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ IH; constructor,
exacts [h₁, h₂, lt_of_lt_of_le h₃ bb]
end
theorem NF.below_of_lt {e n a b} (H : repr e < b) : NF (oadd e n a) → NF_below (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨b', h⟩⟩ := by cases h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃;
exact NF_below.oadd' h₁ h₂ H
theorem NF.below_of_lt' : ∀ {o b}, repr o < ω ^ b → NF o → NF_below o b
| 0 b H _ := NF_below.zero
| (oadd e n a) b H h := h.below_of_lt $ (opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega).1 $
(lt_of_le_of_lt (omega_le_oadd _ _ _) H)
theorem NF_below_of_nat : ∀ n, NF_below (of_nat n) 1
| 0 := NF_below.zero
| (nat.succ n) := NF_below.oadd NF.zero NF_below.zero zero_lt_one
instance NF_of_nat (n) : NF (of_nat n) := ⟨⟨_, NF_below_of_nat n⟩⟩
instance NF_one : NF 1 := by rw ← of_nat_one; apply_instance
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_1 {e₁ n₁ o₁ e₂ n₂ o₂} (h₁ : NF (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) (h : e₁ < e₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ o₁ < oadd e₂ n₂ o₂ :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ _ _ ((h₁.below_of_lt h).repr_lt) (omega_le_oadd _ _ _)
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_2 {e o₁ o₂ : onote} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ+}
(h₁ : NF (oadd e n₁ o₁)) (h : (n₁:ℕ) < n₂) : oadd e n₁ o₁ < oadd e n₂ o₂ :=
begin
simp [lt_def],
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 h₁.snd'.repr_lt)
(le_trans _ (le_add_right _ _)),
rwa [← mul_succ, mul_le_mul_iff_left (opow_pos _ omega_pos), succ_le_iff, nat_cast_lt]
end
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_3 {e n a₁ a₂} (h : a₁ < a₂) :
oadd e n a₁ < oadd e n a₂ :=
begin
rw lt_def, unfold repr,
exact add_lt_add_left h _
end
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ (a b : onote) [NF a] [NF b], (cmp a b).compares a b
| 0 0 h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (oadd e n a) 0 h₁ h₂ := oadd_pos _ _ _
| 0 (oadd e n a) h₁ h₂ := oadd_pos _ _ _
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) h₁ h₂ := begin
rw cmp,
have IHe := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst,
cases cmp e₁ e₂,
case ordering.lt { exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ IHe },
case ordering.gt { exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₂ IHe },
change e₁ = e₂ at IHe, subst IHe,
unfold _root_.cmp, cases nh : cmp_using (<) (n₁:ℕ) n₂,
case ordering.lt
{ rw cmp_using_eq_lt at nh, exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ nh },
case ordering.gt
{ rw cmp_using_eq_gt at nh, exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₂ nh },
rw cmp_using_eq_eq at nh,
obtain rfl := subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp nh),
have IHa := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.snd h₂.snd,
cases cmp a₁ a₂,
case ordering.lt { exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa },
case ordering.gt { exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa },
change a₁ = a₂ at IHa, subst IHa, exact rfl
end
theorem repr_inj {a b} [NF a] [NF b] : repr a = repr b ↔ a = b :=
⟨match cmp a b, cmp_compares a b with
| ordering.lt, (h : repr a < repr b), e := (ne_of_lt h e).elim
| ordering.gt, (h : repr a > repr b), e := (ne_of_gt h e).elim
| ordering.eq, h, e := h
end, congr_arg _⟩
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega_opow {b e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) (d : ω ^ b ∣ repr (oadd e n a)) :
b ≤ repr e ∧ ω ^ b ∣ repr a :=
begin
have := mt repr_inj.1 (λ h, by injection h : oadd e n a ≠ 0),
have L := le_of_not_lt (λ l, not_le_of_lt (h.below_of_lt l).repr_lt (le_of_dvd this d)),
simp at d,
exact ⟨L, (dvd_add_iff $ (opow_dvd_opow _ L).mul_right _).1 d⟩
end
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) :
ω ∣ repr (oadd e n a) → repr e ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ repr a :=
by rw [← opow_one ω, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero]; exact h.of_dvd_omega_opow
/-- `top_below b o` asserts that the largest exponent in `o`, if
it exists, is less than `b`. This is an auxiliary definition
for decidability of `NF`. -/
def top_below (b) : onote → Prop
| 0 := true
| (oadd e n a) := cmp e b = ordering.lt
instance decidable_top_below : decidable_rel top_below :=
by intros b o; cases o; delta top_below; apply_instance
theorem NF_below_iff_top_below {b} [NF b] : ∀ {o},
NF_below o (repr b) ↔ NF o ∧ top_below b o
| 0 := ⟨λ h, ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, trivial⟩, λ _, NF_below.zero⟩
| (oadd e n a) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, (@cmp_compares _ b h.fst _).eq_lt.2 h.lt⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁.below_of_lt $ (@cmp_compares _ b h₁.fst _).eq_lt.1 h₂⟩
instance decidable_NF : decidable_pred NF
| 0 := is_true NF.zero
| (oadd e n a) := begin
have := decidable_NF e,
have := decidable_NF a, resetI,
apply decidable_of_iff (NF e ∧ NF a ∧ top_below e a),
abstract
{ rw ← and_congr_right (λ h, @NF_below_iff_top_below _ h _),
exact ⟨λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, NF.oadd h₁ n h₂, λ h, ⟨h.fst, h.snd'⟩⟩ },
end
/-- Addition of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def add : onote → onote → onote
| 0 o := o
| (oadd e n a) o := match add a o with
| 0 := oadd e n 0
| o'@(oadd e' n' a') := match cmp e e' with
| ordering.lt := o'
| ordering.eq := oadd e (n + n') a'
| ordering.gt := oadd e n o'
end
end
instance : has_add onote := ⟨add⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_add (o : onote) : 0 + o = o := rfl
theorem oadd_add (e n a o) : oadd e n a + o = add._match_1 e n (a + o) := rfl
/-- Subtraction of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def sub : onote → onote → onote
| 0 o := 0
| o 0 := o
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) := match cmp e₁ e₂ with
| ordering.lt := 0
| ordering.gt := o₁
| ordering.eq := match (n₁:ℕ) - n₂ with
| 0 := if n₁ = n₂ then sub a₁ a₂ else 0
| (nat.succ k) := oadd e₁ k.succ_pnat a₁
end
end
instance : has_sub onote := ⟨sub⟩
theorem add_NF_below {b} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, NF_below o₁ b → NF_below o₂ b → NF_below (o₁ + o₂) b
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := h₂
| (oadd e n a) o h₁ h₂ := begin
have h' := add_NF_below (h₁.snd.mono $ le_of_lt h₁.lt) h₂,
simp [oadd_add], cases a + o with e' n' a',
{ exact NF_below.oadd h₁.fst NF_below.zero h₁.lt },
simp [add], have := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h'.fst,
cases cmp e e'; simp [add],
{ exact h' },
{ simp at this, subst e',
exact NF_below.oadd h'.fst h'.snd h'.lt },
{ exact NF_below.oadd h₁.fst (NF.below_of_lt this ⟨⟨_, h'⟩⟩) h₁.lt }
end
instance add_NF (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ + o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩ ⟨⟨b₂, h₂⟩⟩ := ⟨(le_total b₁ b₂).elim
(λ h, ⟨b₂, add_NF_below (h₁.mono h) h₂⟩)
(λ h, ⟨b₁, add_NF_below h₁ (h₂.mono h)⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem repr_add : ∀ o₁ o₂ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ + o₂) = repr o₁ + repr o₂
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := by simp
| (oadd e n a) o h₁ h₂ := begin
haveI := h₁.snd, have h' := repr_add a o,
conv at h' in (_+o) {simp [(+)]},
have nf := onote.add_NF a o,
conv at nf in (_+o) {simp [(+)]},
conv in (_+o) {simp [(+), add]},
cases add a o with e' n' a'; simp [add, h'.symm, add_assoc],
have := h₁.fst, haveI := nf.fst, have ee := cmp_compares e e',
cases cmp e e'; simp [add],
{ rw [← add_assoc, @add_absorp _ (repr e') (ω ^ repr e' * (n':ℕ))],
{ have := (h₁.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt, unfold repr at this,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) this },
{ simpa using (mul_le_mul_iff_left $
opow_pos (repr e') omega_pos).2 (nat_cast_le.2 n'.pos) } },
{ change e = e' at ee, substI e',
rw [← add_assoc, ← mul_add, ← nat.cast_add] }
end
theorem sub_NF_below : ∀ {o₁ o₂ b}, NF_below o₁ b → NF o₂ → NF_below (o₁ - o₂) b
| 0 o b h₁ h₂ := by cases o; exact NF_below.zero
| (oadd e n a) 0 b h₁ h₂ := h₁
| (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) b h₁ h₂ := begin
have h' := sub_NF_below h₁.snd h₂.snd,
simp [has_sub.sub, sub] at h' ⊢,
have := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst,
cases cmp e₁ e₂; simp [sub],
{ apply NF_below.zero },
{ simp at this, subst e₂,
cases mn : (n₁:ℕ) - n₂; simp [sub],
{ by_cases en : n₁ = n₂; simp [en],
{ exact h'.mono (le_of_lt h₁.lt) },
{ exact NF_below.zero } },
{ exact NF_below.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd h₁.lt } },
{ exact h₁ }
end
instance sub_NF (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ - o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩ h₂ := ⟨⟨b₁, sub_NF_below h₁ h₂⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem repr_sub : ∀ o₁ o₂ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ - o₂) = repr o₁ - repr o₂
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := by cases o; exact (ordinal.zero_sub _).symm
| (oadd e n a) 0 h₁ h₂ := (ordinal.sub_zero _).symm
| (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) h₁ h₂ := begin
haveI := h₁.snd, haveI := h₂.snd, have h' := repr_sub a₁ a₂,
conv at h' in (a₁-a₂) {simp [has_sub.sub]},
have nf := onote.sub_NF a₁ a₂,
conv at nf in (a₁-a₂) {simp [has_sub.sub]},
conv in (_-oadd _ _ _) {simp [has_sub.sub, sub]},
have ee := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst,
cases cmp e₁ e₂,
{ rw [ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2], {refl},
exact le_of_lt (oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ ee) },
{ change e₁ = e₂ at ee, substI e₂, unfold sub._match_1,
cases mn : (n₁:ℕ) - n₂; dsimp only [sub._match_2],
{ by_cases en : n₁ = n₂,
{ simpa [en] },
{ simp [en, -repr],
exact (ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 $ le_of_lt $ oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ $
lt_of_le_of_ne (tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 mn) (mt pnat.eq en)).symm } },
{ simp [nat.succ_pnat, -nat.cast_succ],
rw [(tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le $ le_of_lt $ nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ mn).1 mn,
add_comm, nat.cast_add, mul_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_cancel],
refine (ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq $ add_absorp h₂.snd'.repr_lt $
le_trans _ (le_add_right _ _)).symm,
simpa using mul_le_mul_left' (nat_cast_le.2 $ nat.succ_pos _) _ } },
{ exact (ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq $ add_absorp (h₂.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt $
omega_le_oadd _ _ _).symm }
end
/-- Multiplication of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def mul : onote → onote → onote
| 0 _ := 0
| _ 0 := 0
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) :=
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else
oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (mul o₁ a₂)
instance : has_mul onote := ⟨mul⟩
instance : mul_zero_class onote :=
{ mul := (*),
zero := 0,
zero_mul := λ o, by cases o; refl,
mul_zero := λ o, by cases o; refl }
theorem oadd_mul (e₁ n₁ a₁ e₂ n₂ a₂) : oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else
oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * a₂) := rfl
theorem oadd_mul_NF_below {e₁ n₁ a₁ b₁} (h₁ : NF_below (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) b₁) :
∀ {o₂ b₂}, NF_below o₂ b₂ → NF_below (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * o₂) (repr e₁ + b₂)
| 0 b₂ h₂ := NF_below.zero
| (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) b₂ h₂ := begin
have IH := oadd_mul_NF_below h₂.snd,
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0; simp [e0, oadd_mul],
{ apply NF_below.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd,
simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr e₁)).2
(lt_of_le_of_lt (ordinal.zero_le _) h₂.lt) },
{ haveI := h₁.fst, haveI := h₂.fst,
apply NF_below.oadd, apply_instance,
{ rwa repr_add },
{ rw [repr_add, add_lt_add_iff_left], exact h₂.lt } }
end
instance mul_NF : ∀ o₁ o₂ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ * o₂)
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := by cases o; exact NF.zero
| (oadd e n a) o ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁⟩⟩ ⟨⟨b₂, hb₂⟩⟩ :=
⟨⟨_, oadd_mul_NF_below hb₁ hb₂⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem repr_mul : ∀ o₁ o₂ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ * o₂) = repr o₁ * repr o₂
| 0 o h₁ h₂ := by cases o; exact (zero_mul _).symm
| (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) 0 h₁ h₂ := (mul_zero _).symm
| (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) (oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) h₁ h₂ := begin
have IH : repr (mul _ _) = _ := @repr_mul _ _ h₁ h₂.snd,
conv {to_lhs, simp [(*)]},
have ao : repr a₁ + ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁:ℕ) = ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁:ℕ),
{ apply add_absorp h₁.snd'.repr_lt,
simpa using (mul_le_mul_iff_left $ opow_pos _ omega_pos).2
(nat_cast_le.2 n₁.2) },
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0; simp [e0, mul],
{ cases nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero n₂.ne_zero with x xe,
simp [h₂.zero_of_zero e0, xe, -nat.cast_succ],
rw [nat_cast_succ x, add_mul_succ _ ao, mul_assoc] },
{ haveI := h₁.fst, haveI := h₂.fst,
simp [IH, repr_add, opow_add, mul_add],
rw ← mul_assoc, congr' 2,
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0,
rw [add_mul_limit ao (opow_is_limit_left omega_is_limit this),
mul_assoc, mul_omega_dvd (nat_cast_pos.2 n₁.pos) (nat_lt_omega _)],
simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this) },
end
/-- Calculate division and remainder of `o` mod ω.
`split' o = (a, n)` means `o = ω * a + n`. -/
def split' : onote → onote × ℕ
| 0 := (0, 0)
| (oadd e n a) := if e = 0 then (0, n) else
let (a', m) := split' a in (oadd (e - 1) n a', m)
/-- Calculate division and remainder of `o` mod ω.
`split o = (a, n)` means `o = a + n`, where `ω ∣ a`. -/
def split : onote → onote × ℕ
| 0 := (0, 0)
| (oadd e n a) := if e = 0 then (0, n) else
let (a', m) := split a in (oadd e n a', m)
/-- `scale x o` is the ordinal notation for `ω ^ x * o`. -/
def scale (x : onote) : onote → onote
| 0 := 0
| (oadd e n a) := oadd (x + e) n (scale a)
/-- `mul_nat o n` is the ordinal notation for `o * n`. -/
def mul_nat : onote → ℕ → onote
| 0 m := 0
| _ 0 := 0
| (oadd e n a) (m+1) := oadd e (n * m.succ_pnat) a
/-- Auxiliary definition to compute the ordinal notation for the ordinal
exponentiation in `opow` -/
def opow_aux (e a0 a : onote) : ℕ → ℕ → onote
| _ 0 := 0
| 0 (m+1) := oadd e m.succ_pnat 0
| (k+1) m := scale (e + mul_nat a0 k) a + opow_aux k m
/-- `opow o₁ o₂` calculates the ordinal notation for
the ordinal exponential `o₁ ^ o₂`. -/
def opow (o₁ o₂ : onote) : onote :=
match split o₁ with
| (0, 0) := if o₂ = 0 then 1 else 0
| (0, 1) := 1
| (0, m+1) := let (b', k) := split' o₂ in
oadd b' (@has_pow.pow ℕ+ _ _ m.succ_pnat k) 0
| (a@(oadd a0 _ _), m) := match split o₂ with
| (b, 0) := oadd (a0 * b) 1 0
| (b, k+1) := let eb := a0*b in
scale (eb + mul_nat a0 k) a + opow_aux eb a0 (mul_nat a m) k m
end
end
instance : has_pow onote onote := ⟨opow⟩
theorem opow_def (o₁ o₂ : onote) : o₁ ^ o₂ = opow._match_1 o₂ (split o₁) := rfl
theorem split_eq_scale_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → split o = (scale 1 o', m)
| 0 o' m h p := by injection p; substs o' m; refl
| (oadd e n a) o' m h p := begin
by_cases e0 : e = 0; simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢,
{ rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ revert p, cases h' : split' a with a' m',
haveI := h.fst, haveI := h.snd,
simp [split_eq_scale_split' h', split, split'],
have : 1 + (e - 1) = e,
{ refine repr_inj.1 _, simp,
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0,
exact ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this) },
intros, substs o' m, simp [scale, this] }
end
theorem NF_repr_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → NF o' ∧ repr o = ω * repr o' + m
| 0 o' m h p := by injection p; substs o' m; simp [NF.zero]
| (oadd e n a) o' m h p := begin
by_cases e0 : e = 0; simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢,
{ rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
simp [h.zero_of_zero e0, NF.zero] },
{ revert p, cases h' : split' a with a' m',
haveI := h.fst, haveI := h.snd,
cases NF_repr_split' h' with IH₁ IH₂,
simp [IH₂, split'],
intros, substs o' m,
have : (ω : ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e = ω ^ (1 : ordinal.{0}) * ω ^ (repr e - 1),
{ have := mt repr_inj.1 e0,
rw [← opow_add, ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)] },
refine ⟨NF.oadd (by apply_instance) _ _, _⟩,
{ simp at this ⊢,
refine IH₁.below_of_lt' ((mul_lt_mul_iff_left omega_pos).1 $
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ m') _),
rw [← this, ← IH₂], exact h.snd'.repr_lt },
{ rw this, simp [mul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc] } }
end
theorem scale_eq_mul (x) [NF x] : ∀ o [NF o], scale x o = oadd x 1 0 * o
| 0 h := rfl
| (oadd e n a) h := begin
simp [(*)], simp [mul, scale],
haveI := h.snd,
by_cases e0 : e = 0,
{ rw scale_eq_mul, simp [e0, h.zero_of_zero, show x + 0 = x, from repr_inj.1 (by simp)] },
{ simp [e0, scale_eq_mul, (*)] }
end
instance NF_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : NF (scale x o) :=
by rw scale_eq_mul; apply_instance
@[simp] theorem repr_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : repr (scale x o) = ω ^ repr x * repr o :=
by simp [scale_eq_mul]
theorem NF_repr_split {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : NF o' ∧ repr o = repr o' + m :=
begin
cases e : split' o with a n,
cases NF_repr_split' e with s₁ s₂, resetI,
rw split_eq_scale_split' e at h,
injection h, substs o' n,
simp [repr_scale, s₂.symm],
apply_instance
end
theorem split_dvd {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : ω ∣ repr o' :=
begin
cases e : split' o with a n,
rw split_eq_scale_split' e at h,
injection h, subst o',
cases NF_repr_split' e, resetI, simp
end
theorem split_add_lt {o e n a m} [NF o] (h : split o = (oadd e n a, m)) : repr a + m < ω ^ repr e :=
begin
cases NF_repr_split h with h₁ h₂,
cases h₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd h) with e0 d,
have := h₁.fst, have := h₁.snd,
apply principal_add_omega_opow _ h₁.snd'.repr_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat_lt_omega _) _),
simpa using opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0),
end
@[simp] theorem mul_nat_eq_mul (n o) : mul_nat o n = o * of_nat n :=
by cases o; cases n; refl
instance NF_mul_nat (o) [NF o] (n) : NF (mul_nat o n) :=
by simp; apply_instance
instance NF_opow_aux (e a0 a) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] : ∀ k m, NF (opow_aux e a0 a k m)
| k 0 := by cases k; exact NF.zero
| 0 (m+1) := NF.oadd_zero _ _
| (k+1) (m+1) := by haveI := NF_opow_aux k;
simp [opow_aux, nat.succ_ne_zero]; apply_instance
instance NF_opow (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : NF (o₁ ^ o₂) :=
begin
cases e₁ : split o₁ with a m,
have na := (NF_repr_split e₁).1,
cases e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k,
haveI := (NF_repr_split' e₂).1,
casesI a with a0 n a',
{ cases m with m,
{ by_cases o₂ = 0; simp [pow, opow, *]; apply_instance },
{ by_cases m = 0,
{ simp only [pow, opow, *, zero_def], apply_instance },
{ simp [pow, opow, *, - npow_eq_pow], apply_instance } } },
{ simp [pow, opow, e₁, e₂, split_eq_scale_split' e₂],
have := na.fst,
cases k with k; simp [opow]; resetI; apply_instance }
end
theorem scale_opow_aux (e a0 a : onote) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] :
∀ k m, repr (opow_aux e a0 a k m) = ω ^ repr e * repr (opow_aux 0 a0 a k m)
| 0 m := by cases m; simp [opow_aux]
| (k+1) m := by by_cases m = 0; simp [h, opow_aux, mul_add, opow_add, mul_assoc, scale_opow_aux]
theorem repr_opow_aux₁ {e a} [Ne : NF e] [Na : NF a] {a' : ordinal} (e0 : repr e ≠ 0)
(h : a' < (ω : ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e) (aa : repr a = a') (n : ℕ+) :
((ω : ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e * (n:ℕ) + a') ^ (ω : ordinal.{0}) =
(ω ^ repr e) ^ (ω : ordinal.{0}) :=
begin
subst aa,
have No := Ne.oadd n (Na.below_of_lt' h),
have := omega_le_oadd e n a, unfold repr at this,
refine le_antisymm _ (opow_le_opow_left _ this),
apply (opow_le_of_limit ((opow_pos _ omega_pos).trans_le this).ne' omega_is_limit).2,
intros b l,
have := (No.below_of_lt (lt_succ _)).repr_lt, unfold repr at this,
apply (opow_le_opow_left b $ this.le).trans,
rw [← opow_mul, ← opow_mul],
apply opow_le_opow_right omega_pos,
cases le_or_lt ω (repr e) with h h,
{ apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ b) _).trans,
rw [←add_one_eq_succ, add_mul_succ _ (one_add_of_omega_le h), add_one_eq_succ,
succ_le_iff, mul_lt_mul_iff_left (ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)],
exact omega_is_limit.2 _ l },
{ apply (principal_mul_omega (omega_is_limit.2 _ h) l).le.trans,
simpa using mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0) ω }
end
section
local infixr (name := ordinal.pow) ^ := @pow ordinal.{0} ordinal ordinal.has_pow
theorem repr_opow_aux₂ {a0 a'} [N0 : NF a0] [Na' : NF a'] (m : ℕ)
(d : ω ∣ repr a')
(e0 : repr a0 ≠ 0) (h : repr a' + m < ω ^ repr a0) (n : ℕ+) (k : ℕ) :
let R := repr (opow_aux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * of_nat m) k m) in
(k ≠ 0 → R < (ω ^ repr a0) ^ succ k) ∧
(ω ^ repr a0) ^ k * (ω ^ repr a0 * (n:ℕ) + repr a') + R =
(ω ^ repr a0 * (n:ℕ) + repr a' + m) ^ succ k :=
begin
intro,
haveI No : NF (oadd a0 n a') :=
N0.oadd n (Na'.below_of_lt' $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) h),
induction k with k IH, {cases m; simp [opow_aux, R]},
rename R R', let R := repr (opow_aux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * of_nat m) k m),
let ω0 := ω ^ repr a0, let α' := ω0 * n + repr a',
change (k ≠ 0 → R < ω0 ^ succ k) ∧ ω0 ^ k * α' + R = (α' + m) ^ succ k at IH,
have RR : R' = ω0 ^ k * (α' * m) + R,
{ by_cases m = 0; simp [h, R', opow_aux, R, opow_mul],
{ cases k; simp [opow_aux] }, { refl } },
have α0 : 0 < α', {simpa [α', lt_def, repr] using oadd_pos a0 n a'},
have ω00 : 0 < ω0 ^ k := opow_pos _ (opow_pos _ omega_pos),
have Rl : R < ω ^ (repr a0 * succ ↑k),
{ by_cases k0 : k = 0,
{ simp [k0],
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ (opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)),
cases m with m; simp [k0, R, opow_aux, omega_pos],
rw [←add_one_eq_succ, ←nat.cast_succ], apply nat_lt_omega },
{ rw opow_mul, exact IH.1 k0 } },
refine ⟨λ_, _, _⟩,
{ rw [RR, ← opow_mul _ _ (succ k.succ)],
have e0 := ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0,
have rr0 := lt_of_lt_of_le e0 (le_add_left _ _),
apply principal_add_omega_opow,
{ simp [opow_mul, ω0, opow_add, mul_assoc],
rw [mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00, ← ordinal.opow_add],
have := (No.below_of_lt _).repr_lt, unfold repr at this,
refine mul_lt_omega_opow rr0 this (nat_lt_omega _),
simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr a0)).2 e0 },
{ refine lt_of_lt_of_le Rl (opow_le_opow_right omega_pos $
mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 (nat_cast_le.2 (le_of_lt k.lt_succ_self))) _) } },
calc
ω0 ^ k.succ * α' + R'
= ω0 ^ succ k * α' + (ω0 ^ k * α' * m + R) : by rw [nat_cast_succ, RR, ← mul_assoc]
... = (ω0 ^ k * α' + R) * α' + (ω0 ^ k * α' + R) * m : _
... = (α' + m) ^ succ k.succ : by rw [← mul_add, nat_cast_succ, opow_succ, IH.2],
congr' 1,
{ have αd : ω ∣ α' := dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left
(by simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)) _) d,
rw [mul_add (ω0 ^ k), add_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← opow_succ,
add_mul_limit _ (is_limit_iff_omega_dvd.2 ⟨ne_of_gt α0, αd⟩), mul_assoc,
@mul_omega_dvd n (nat_cast_pos.2 n.pos) (nat_lt_omega _) _ αd],
apply @add_absorp _ (repr a0 * succ k),
{ refine principal_add_omega_opow _ _ Rl,
rw [opow_mul, opow_succ, mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00],
exact No.snd'.repr_lt },
{ have := mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 $ nat_cast_pos.2 n.pos) (ω0 ^ succ k),
rw opow_mul, simpa [-opow_succ] } },
{ cases m,
{ have : R = 0, {cases k; simp [R, opow_aux]}, simp [this] },
{ rw [nat_cast_succ, add_mul_succ],
apply add_absorp Rl,
rw [opow_mul, opow_succ],
apply mul_le_mul_left',
simpa [α', repr] using omega_le_oadd a0 n a' } }
end
end
theorem repr_opow (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : repr (o₁ ^ o₂) = repr o₁ ^ repr o₂ :=
begin
cases e₁ : split o₁ with a m,
cases NF_repr_split e₁ with N₁ r₁,
cases a with a0 n a',
{ cases m with m,
{ by_cases o₂ = 0; simp [opow_def, opow, e₁, h, r₁],
have := mt repr_inj.1 h, rw zero_opow this },
{ cases e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k,
cases NF_repr_split' e₂ with _ r₂,
by_cases m = 0; simp [opow_def, opow, e₁, h, r₁, e₂, r₂, -nat.cast_succ],
rw [opow_add, opow_mul, opow_omega _ (nat_lt_omega _)],
simpa using nat_cast_lt.2 (nat.succ_lt_succ $ pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h) } },
{ haveI := N₁.fst, haveI := N₁.snd,
cases N₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd e₁) with a00 ad,
have al := split_add_lt e₁,
have aa : repr (a' + of_nat m) = repr a' + m, {simp},
cases e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k,
cases NF_repr_split' e₂ with _ r₂,
simp [opow_def, opow, e₁, r₁, split_eq_scale_split' e₂],
cases k with k; resetI,
{ simp [opow, r₂, opow_mul, repr_opow_aux₁ a00 al aa, add_assoc] },
{ simp [opow, r₂, opow_add, opow_mul, mul_assoc, add_assoc],
rw [repr_opow_aux₁ a00 al aa, scale_opow_aux], simp [opow_mul],
rw [← mul_add, ← add_assoc ((ω : ordinal.{0}) ^ repr a0 * (n:ℕ))], congr' 1,
rw [← opow_succ],
exact (repr_opow_aux₂ _ ad a00 al _ _).2 } }
end
/-- Given an ordinal, returns `inl none` for `0`, `inl (some a)` for `a+1`, and
`inr f` for a limit ordinal `a`, where `f i` is a sequence converging to `a`. -/
def fundamental_sequence : onote → option onote ⊕ (ℕ → onote)
| zero := sum.inl none
| (oadd a m b) :=
match fundamental_sequence b with
| sum.inr f := sum.inr (λ i, oadd a m (f i))
| sum.inl (some b') := sum.inl (some (oadd a m b'))
| sum.inl none := match fundamental_sequence a, m.nat_pred with
| sum.inl none, 0 := sum.inl (some zero)
| sum.inl none, m+1 := sum.inl (some (oadd zero m.succ_pnat zero))
| sum.inl (some a'), 0 := sum.inr (λ i, oadd a' i.succ_pnat zero)
| sum.inl (some a'), m+1 := sum.inr (λ i, oadd a m.succ_pnat (oadd a' i.succ_pnat zero))
| sum.inr f, 0 := sum.inr (λ i, oadd (f i) 1 zero)
| sum.inr f, m+1 := sum.inr (λ i, oadd a m.succ_pnat (oadd (f i) 1 zero))
end
end
private theorem exists_lt_add {α} [hα : nonempty α] {o : ordinal} {f : α → ordinal}
(H : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a < o → ∃ i, a < f i) {b : ordinal} ⦃a⦄ (h : a < b + o) : ∃ i, a < b + f i :=
begin
cases lt_or_le a b with h h',
{ obtain ⟨i⟩ := id hα, exact ⟨i, h.trans_le (le_add_right _ _)⟩ },
{ rw [← ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h', add_lt_add_iff_left] at h,
refine (H h).imp (λ i H, _),
rwa [← ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h', add_lt_add_iff_left] }
end
private theorem exists_lt_mul_omega' {o : ordinal} ⦃a⦄ (h : a < o * ω) : ∃ i : ℕ, a < o * ↑i + o :=
begin
obtain ⟨i, hi, h'⟩ := (lt_mul_of_limit omega_is_limit).1 h,
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := lt_omega.1 hi,
exact ⟨i, h'.trans_le (le_add_right _ _)⟩
end
local infixr (name := ordinal.pow) ^ := @pow ordinal ordinal ordinal.has_pow
private theorem exists_lt_omega_opow' {α} {o b : ordinal}
(hb : 1 < b) (ho : o.is_limit) {f : α → ordinal}
(H : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a < o → ∃ i, a < f i) ⦃a⦄ (h : a < b ^ o) : ∃ i, a < b ^ f i :=
begin
obtain ⟨d, hd, h'⟩ := (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' ho).1 h,
exact (H hd).imp (λ i hi, h'.trans $ (opow_lt_opow_iff_right hb).2 hi)
end
/-- The property satisfied by `fundamental_sequence o`:
* `inl none` means `o = 0`
* `inl (some a)` means `o = succ a`
* `inr f` means `o` is a limit ordinal and `f` is a
strictly increasing sequence which converges to `o` -/
def fundamental_sequence_prop (o : onote) : option onote ⊕ (ℕ → onote) → Prop
| (sum.inl none) := o = 0
| (sum.inl (some a)) := o.repr = succ a.repr ∧ (o.NF → a.NF)
| (sum.inr f) := o.repr.is_limit ∧
(∀ i, f i < f (i + 1) ∧ f i < o ∧ (o.NF → (f i).NF)) ∧
(∀ a, a < o.repr → ∃ i, a < (f i).repr)
theorem fundamental_sequence_has_prop (o) : fundamental_sequence_prop o (fundamental_sequence o) :=
begin
induction o with a m b iha ihb, {exact rfl},
rw [fundamental_sequence],
rcases e : b.fundamental_sequence with ⟨_|b'⟩|f;
simp only [fundamental_sequence, fundamental_sequence_prop];
rw [e, fundamental_sequence_prop] at ihb,
{ rcases e : a.fundamental_sequence with ⟨_|a'⟩|f; cases e' : m.nat_pred with m';
simp only [fundamental_sequence, fundamental_sequence_prop];
rw [e, fundamental_sequence_prop] at iha;
try { rw show m = 1,
{ have := pnat.nat_pred_add_one m, rw [e'] at this, exact pnat.coe_inj.1 this.symm } };
try { rw show m = m'.succ.succ_pnat,
{ rw [← e', ← pnat.coe_inj, nat.succ_pnat_coe, ← nat.add_one, pnat.nat_pred_add_one] } };
simp only [repr, iha, ihb, opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega,
add_lt_add_iff_left, add_zero, coe_coe, eq_self_iff_true, lt_add_iff_pos_right,
lt_def, mul_one, nat.cast_zero, nat.cast_succ, nat.succ_pnat_coe, opow_succ,
opow_zero, mul_add_one, pnat.one_coe, succ_zero, true_and, _root_.zero_add,
zero_def],
{ apply_instance },
{ exact ⟨rfl, infer_instance⟩ },
{ have := opow_pos _ omega_pos,
refine ⟨mul_is_limit this omega_is_limit,
λ i, ⟨this, _, λ H, @NF.oadd_zero _ _ (iha.2 H.fst)⟩, exists_lt_mul_omega'⟩,
rw [← mul_succ, ← nat_cast_succ, ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this],
apply nat_lt_omega },
{ have := opow_pos _ omega_pos,
refine ⟨
add_is_limit _ (mul_is_limit this omega_is_limit), λ i, ⟨this, _, _⟩,
exists_lt_add exists_lt_mul_omega'⟩,
{ rw [← mul_succ, ← nat_cast_succ, ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this],
apply nat_lt_omega },
{ refine λ H, H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' _ (@NF.oadd_zero _ _ (iha.2 H.fst))),
rw [repr, repr, add_zero, iha.1, opow_succ, ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this],
apply nat_lt_omega } },
{ rcases iha with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩,
refine ⟨opow_is_limit one_lt_omega h1, λ i, _, exists_lt_omega_opow' one_lt_omega h1 h3⟩,
obtain ⟨h4, h5, h6⟩ := h2 i, exact ⟨h4, h5, λ H, @NF.oadd_zero _ _ (h6 H.fst)⟩ },
{ rcases iha with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩,
refine ⟨add_is_limit _ (opow_is_limit one_lt_omega h1), λ i, _,
exists_lt_add (exists_lt_omega_opow' one_lt_omega h1 h3)⟩,
obtain ⟨h4, h5, h6⟩ := h2 i,
refine ⟨h4, h5, λ H, H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' _ (@NF.oadd_zero _ _ (h6 H.fst)))⟩,
rwa [repr, repr, add_zero, coe_coe, pnat.one_coe, nat.cast_one, mul_one,
opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega] } },
{ refine ⟨by rw [repr, ihb.1, add_succ, repr],
λ H, H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' _ (ihb.2 H.snd))⟩,
have := H.snd'.repr_lt, rw ihb.1 at this,
exact (lt_succ _).trans this },
{ rcases ihb with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩,
simp only [repr],
exact ⟨ordinal.add_is_limit _ h1,
λ i, ⟨oadd_lt_oadd_3 (h2 i).1, oadd_lt_oadd_3 (h2 i).2.1, λ H, H.fst.oadd _
(NF.below_of_lt' (lt_trans (h2 i).2.1 H.snd'.repr_lt) ((h2 i).2.2 H.snd))⟩,
exists_lt_add h3⟩ }
end
/-- The fast growing hierarchy for ordinal notations `< ε₀`. This is a sequence of
functions `ℕ → ℕ` indexed by ordinals, with the definition:
* `f_0(n) = n + 1`
* `f_(α+1)(n) = f_α^[n](n)`
* `f_α(n) = f_(α[n])(n)` where `α` is a limit ordinal
and `α[i]` is the fundamental sequence converging to `α` -/
def fast_growing : onote → ℕ → ℕ
| o :=
match fundamental_sequence o, fundamental_sequence_has_prop o with
| sum.inl none, _ := nat.succ
| sum.inl (some a), h :=
have a < o, { rw [lt_def, h.1], apply lt_succ },
λ i, (fast_growing a)^[i] i
| sum.inr f, h := λ i, have f i < o, from (h.2.1 i).2.1, fast_growing (f i) i
end
using_well_founded
{ rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, inv_image.wf repr ordinal.lt_wf⟩],
dec_tac := `[assumption] }
theorem fast_growing_def
{o : onote} {x} (e : fundamental_sequence o = x) :
fast_growing o =
fast_growing._match_1 o
(λ a _ _, a.fast_growing)
(λ f _ i _, (f i).fast_growing i)
x (e ▸ fundamental_sequence_has_prop _) :=
by { subst x, rw [fast_growing] }
theorem fast_growing_zero' (o : onote) (h : fundamental_sequence o = sum.inl none) :
fast_growing o = nat.succ := by { rw [fast_growing_def h], refl }
theorem fast_growing_succ (o) {a} (h : fundamental_sequence o = sum.inl (some a)) :
fast_growing o = λ i, ((fast_growing a)^[i] i) := by { rw [fast_growing_def h], refl }
theorem fast_growing_limit (o) {f} (h : fundamental_sequence o = sum.inr f) :
fast_growing o = λ i, fast_growing (f i) i := by { rw [fast_growing_def h], refl }
@[simp] theorem fast_growing_zero : fast_growing 0 = nat.succ := fast_growing_zero' _ rfl
@[simp] theorem fast_growing_one : fast_growing 1 = (λ n, 2 * n) :=
begin
rw [@fast_growing_succ 1 0 rfl], funext i, rw [two_mul, fast_growing_zero],
suffices : ∀ a b, nat.succ^[a] b = b + a, from this _ _,
intros a b, induction a; simp [*, function.iterate_succ', nat.add_succ],
end
section
local infixr (name := pow) ^ := pow
@[simp] theorem fast_growing_two : fast_growing 2 = (λ n, 2 ^ n * n) :=
begin
rw [@fast_growing_succ 2 1 rfl], funext i, rw [fast_growing_one],
suffices : ∀ a b, (λ (n : ℕ), 2 * n)^[a] b = 2 ^ a * b, from this _ _,
intros a b, induction a; simp [*, function.iterate_succ', pow_succ, mul_assoc],
end
end
/-- We can extend the fast growing hierarchy one more step to `ε₀` itself,
using `ω^(ω^...^ω^0)` as the fundamental sequence converging to `ε₀` (which is not an `onote`).
Extending the fast growing hierarchy beyond this requires a definition of fundamental sequence
for larger ordinals. -/
def fast_growing_ε₀ (i : ℕ) : ℕ := fast_growing ((λ a, a.oadd 1 0)^[i] 0) i
theorem fast_growing_ε₀_zero : fast_growing_ε₀ 0 = 1 := by simp [fast_growing_ε₀]
theorem fast_growing_ε₀_one : fast_growing_ε₀ 1 = 2 :=
by simp [fast_growing_ε₀, show oadd 0 1 0 = 1, from rfl]
theorem fast_growing_ε₀_two : fast_growing_ε₀ 2 = 2048 :=
by norm_num [fast_growing_ε₀,
show oadd 0 1 0 = 1, from rfl,
@fast_growing_limit (oadd 1 1 0) _ rfl,
show oadd 0 (2:nat).succ_pnat 0 = 3, from rfl,
@fast_growing_succ 3 2 rfl]
end onote
/-- The type of normal ordinal notations. (It would have been
nicer to define this right in the inductive type, but `NF o`
requires `repr` which requires `onote`, so all these things
would have to be defined at once, which messes up the VM
representation.) -/
def nonote := {o : onote // o.NF}
instance : decidable_eq nonote := by unfold nonote; apply_instance
namespace nonote
open onote
instance NF (o : nonote) : NF o.1 := o.2
/-- Construct a `nonote` from an ordinal notation
(and infer normality) -/
def mk (o : onote) [h : NF o] : nonote := ⟨o, h⟩
/-- The ordinal represented by an ordinal notation.
(This function is noncomputable because ordinal
arithmetic is noncomputable. In computational applications
`nonote` can be used exclusively without reference
to `ordinal`, but this function allows for correctness
results to be stated.) -/
noncomputable def repr (o : nonote) : ordinal := o.1.repr
instance : has_to_string nonote := ⟨λ x, x.1.to_string⟩
instance : has_repr nonote := ⟨λ x, x.1.repr'⟩
instance : preorder nonote :=
{ le := λ x y, repr x ≤ repr y,
lt := λ x y, repr x < repr y,
le_refl := λ a, @le_refl ordinal _ _,
le_trans := λ a b c, @le_trans ordinal _ _ _ _,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ a b, @lt_iff_le_not_le ordinal _ _ _ }
instance : has_zero nonote := ⟨⟨0, NF.zero⟩⟩
instance : inhabited nonote := ⟨0⟩
theorem lt_wf : @well_founded nonote (<) := inv_image.wf repr ordinal.lt_wf
instance : well_founded_lt nonote := ⟨lt_wf⟩
instance : has_well_founded nonote := ⟨(<), lt_wf⟩
/-- Convert a natural number to an ordinal notation -/
def of_nat (n : ℕ) : nonote := ⟨of_nat n, ⟨⟨_, NF_below_of_nat _⟩⟩⟩
/-- Compare ordinal notations -/
def cmp (a b : nonote) : ordering :=
cmp a.1 b.1
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ a b : nonote, (cmp a b).compares a b
| ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ := begin
resetI,
dsimp [cmp], have := onote.cmp_compares a b,
cases onote.cmp a b; try {exact this},
exact subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 this
end
instance : linear_order nonote := linear_order_of_compares cmp cmp_compares
instance : is_well_order nonote (<) := { }
/-- Asserts that `repr a < ω ^ repr b`. Used in `nonote.rec_on` -/
def below (a b : nonote) : Prop := NF_below a.1 (repr b)
/-- The `oadd` pseudo-constructor for `nonote` -/
def oadd (e : nonote) (n : ℕ+) (a : nonote) (h : below a e) : nonote := ⟨_, NF.oadd e.2 n h⟩
/-- This is a recursor-like theorem for `nonote` suggesting an
inductive definition, which can't actually be defined this
way due to conflicting dependencies. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def rec_on {C : nonote → Sort*} (o : nonote)
(H0 : C 0)
(H1 : ∀ e n a h, C e → C a → C (oadd e n a h)) : C o :=
begin
cases o with o h, induction o with e n a IHe IHa,
{ exact H0 },
{ exact H1 ⟨e, h.fst⟩ n ⟨a, h.snd⟩ h.snd' (IHe _) (IHa _) }
end
/-- Addition of ordinal notations -/
instance : has_add nonote := ⟨λ x y, mk (x.1 + y.1)⟩
theorem repr_add (a b) : repr (a + b) = repr a + repr b :=
onote.repr_add a.1 b.1
/-- Subtraction of ordinal notations -/
instance : has_sub nonote := ⟨λ x y, mk (x.1 - y.1)⟩
theorem repr_sub (a b) : repr (a - b) = repr a - repr b :=
onote.repr_sub a.1 b.1
/-- Multiplication of ordinal notations -/
instance : has_mul nonote := ⟨λ x y, mk (x.1 * y.1)⟩
theorem repr_mul (a b) : repr (a * b) = repr a * repr b :=
onote.repr_mul a.1 b.1
/-- Exponentiation of ordinal notations -/
def opow (x y : nonote) := mk (x.1.opow y.1)
theorem repr_opow (a b) : repr (opow a b) = repr a ^ repr b :=
onote.repr_opow a.1 b.1
end nonote
|
1c32429813e3e8f76bb8d923f08458eddf93a2ba | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/data/rbmap/default.lean | c2bed52e5ba489c43f146d336f3bfc3f5d553c26 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,760 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.data.rbtree.default
universes u v
namespace Mathlib
namespace rbmap
/- Auxiliary instances -/
/- Helper lemmas for reusing rbtree results. -/
theorem eq_some_of_to_value_eq_some {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {e : Option (α × β)} {v : β} : to_value e = some v → ∃ (k : α), e = some (k, v) := sorry
theorem eq_none_of_to_value_eq_none {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {e : Option (α × β)} : to_value e = none → e = none := sorry
/- Lemmas -/
theorem not_mem_mk_rbmap {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} (k : α) : ¬k ∈ mk_rbmap α β := sorry
theorem not_mem_of_empty {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} {m : rbmap α β} (k : α) : empty m = tt → ¬k ∈ m := sorry
theorem not_mem_of_find_entry_none {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k : α} {m : rbmap α β} : find_entry m k = none → ¬k ∈ m := sorry
theorem not_mem_of_find_none {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k : α} {m : rbmap α β} : find m k = none → ¬k ∈ m := sorry
theorem mem_of_find_entry_some {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {e : α × β} {m : rbmap α β} : find_entry m k₁ = some e → k₁ ∈ m := sorry
theorem mem_of_find_some {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : find m k = some v → k ∈ m := sorry
theorem find_entry_eq_find_entry_of_eqv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {m : rbmap α β} {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} : strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ → find_entry m k₁ = find_entry m k₂ := sorry
theorem find_eq_find_of_eqv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) : strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ → find m k₁ = find m k₂ := sorry
theorem find_entry_correct {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] (k : α) (m : rbmap α β) : k ∈ m ↔ ∃ (e : α × β), find_entry m k = some e ∧ strict_weak_order.equiv k (prod.fst e) := sorry
theorem eqv_of_find_entry_some {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : find_entry m k₁ = some (k₂, v) → strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ := sorry
theorem eq_of_find_entry_some {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_total_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : find_entry m k₁ = some (k₂, v) → k₁ = k₂ :=
fun (h : find_entry m k₁ = some (k₂, v)) =>
(fun (this : strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂) => eq_of_eqv_lt this) (eqv_of_find_entry_some h)
theorem find_correct {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] (k : α) (m : rbmap α β) : k ∈ m ↔ ∃ (v : β), find m k = some v := sorry
theorem constains_correct {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] (k : α) (m : rbmap α β) : k ∈ m ↔ contains m k = tt := sorry
theorem mem_of_mem_of_eqv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {m : rbmap α β} {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} : k₁ ∈ m → strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ → k₂ ∈ m := sorry
theorem mem_insert_of_incomp {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : ¬lt k₁ k₂ ∧ ¬lt k₂ k₁ → k₁ ∈ insert m k₂ v :=
fun (h : ¬lt k₁ k₂ ∧ ¬lt k₂ k₁) => to_rbmap_mem (rbtree.mem_insert_of_incomp m (eqv_entries_of_eqv_keys v v h))
theorem mem_insert {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] (k : α) (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : k ∈ insert m k v :=
to_rbmap_mem (rbtree.mem_insert (k, v) m)
theorem mem_insert_of_equiv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ → k₁ ∈ insert m k₂ v :=
mem_insert_of_incomp m v
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {m : rbmap α β} (k₂ : α) (v : β) : k₁ ∈ m → k₁ ∈ insert m k₂ v :=
fun (h : k₁ ∈ m) => to_rbmap_mem (rbtree.mem_insert_of_mem (k₂, v) (to_rbtree_mem' v h))
theorem equiv_or_mem_of_mem_insert {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : k₁ ∈ insert m k₂ v → strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ ∨ k₁ ∈ m := sorry
theorem incomp_or_mem_of_mem_ins {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : k₁ ∈ insert m k₂ v → ¬lt k₁ k₂ ∧ ¬lt k₂ k₁ ∨ k₁ ∈ m :=
equiv_or_mem_of_mem_insert
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_ins {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_total_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : k₁ ∈ insert m k₂ v → k₁ = k₂ ∨ k₁ ∈ m := sorry
theorem find_entry_insert_of_eqv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] (m : rbmap α β) {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (v : β) : strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ → find_entry (insert m k₁ v) k₂ = some (k₁, v) := sorry
theorem find_entry_insert {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] (m : rbmap α β) (k : α) (v : β) : find_entry (insert m k v) k = some (k, v) :=
find_entry_insert_of_eqv m v (refl k)
theorem find_insert_of_eqv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] (m : rbmap α β) {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (v : β) : strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ → find (insert m k₁ v) k₂ = some v := sorry
theorem find_insert {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] (m : rbmap α β) (k : α) (v : β) : find (insert m k v) k = some v :=
find_insert_of_eqv m v (refl k)
theorem find_entry_insert_of_disj {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : lt k₁ k₂ ∨ lt k₂ k₁ → find_entry (insert m k₁ v) k₂ = find_entry m k₂ := sorry
theorem find_entry_insert_of_not_eqv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : ¬strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ → find_entry (insert m k₁ v) k₂ = find_entry m k₂ := sorry
theorem find_entry_insert_of_ne {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_total_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : k₁ ≠ k₂ → find_entry (insert m k₁ v) k₂ = find_entry m k₂ :=
fun (h : k₁ ≠ k₂) => find_entry_insert_of_not_eqv m v fun (h' : strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂) => h (eq_of_eqv_lt h')
theorem find_insert_of_disj {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : lt k₁ k₂ ∨ lt k₂ k₁ → find (insert m k₁ v) k₂ = find m k₂ := sorry
theorem find_insert_of_not_eqv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : ¬strict_weak_order.equiv k₁ k₂ → find (insert m k₁ v) k₂ = find m k₂ := sorry
theorem find_insert_of_ne {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_total_order α lt] {k₁ : α} {k₂ : α} (m : rbmap α β) (v : β) : k₁ ≠ k₂ → find (insert m k₁ v) k₂ = find m k₂ := sorry
theorem mem_of_min_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_total_order α lt] {k : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : min m = some (k, v) → k ∈ m :=
fun (h : min m = some (k, v)) => to_rbmap_mem (rbtree.mem_of_min_eq h)
theorem mem_of_max_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_total_order α lt] {k : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : max m = some (k, v) → k ∈ m :=
fun (h : max m = some (k, v)) => to_rbmap_mem (rbtree.mem_of_max_eq h)
theorem eq_leaf_of_min_eq_none {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {m : rbmap α β} : min m = none → m = mk_rbmap α β :=
rbtree.eq_leaf_of_min_eq_none
theorem eq_leaf_of_max_eq_none {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {m : rbmap α β} : max m = none → m = mk_rbmap α β :=
rbtree.eq_leaf_of_max_eq_none
theorem min_is_minimal {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : min m = some (k, v) → ∀ {k' : α}, k' ∈ m → strict_weak_order.equiv k k' ∨ lt k k' := sorry
theorem max_is_maximal {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_weak_order α lt] {k : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : max m = some (k, v) → ∀ {k' : α}, k' ∈ m → strict_weak_order.equiv k k' ∨ lt k' k := sorry
theorem min_is_minimal_of_total {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_total_order α lt] {k : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : min m = some (k, v) → ∀ {k' : α}, k' ∈ m → k = k' ∨ lt k k' := sorry
theorem max_is_maximal_of_total {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {lt : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel lt] [is_strict_total_order α lt] {k : α} {v : β} {m : rbmap α β} : max m = some (k, v) → ∀ {k' : α}, k' ∈ m → k = k' ∨ lt k' k := sorry
|
9806b2ce77c37e5acc3ac1e008904a5fac97aa7a | d6df40070de62348d40ffe5d02f9c5e18250e863 | /src/apartness_topology_1.lean | 71ac74044773ebdeaa68a069e77e4013b10bc939 | [] | no_license | owen-fool/Elementary-Apartness-Spaces | f1ce08f065092c21c7d179cac5f7527f4fea7e46 | 139029bae2c9f40322ee4c75f8f5299b5bf4f2d5 | refs/heads/master | 1,670,498,775,650 | 1,597,845,090,000 | 1,597,845,090,000 | 293,635,048 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,396 | lean | import tactic
import topology.basic
import apartness_spaces
variables (X : Type) (τ : topological_space X)
namespace top_apart
def apart (x : X) (A : set X) : Prop :=
∃ U : set X, (τ.is_open U) ∧ (x ∈ U ∧ U ⊆ {z | ∀ y, y ∈ A → z ≠ y})
def apartness_complement (S : set X) : set X :=
{x | apart X τ x S}
def apartness_difference (A : set X) (S : set X) : set X :=
A ∩ (apartness_complement X τ S)
def near (x : X) (A : set X) : Prop :=
∀ S : set X, x ∈ (apartness_complement X τ S) → ∃ y : X, y ∈ (apartness_difference X τ A S)
variable (A5 : ∀ (x : X) (A : set X), apart X τ x A → (∀ y : X, x ≠ y ∨ apart X τ y A))
open point_set_apartness
@[instance]
lemma topological_apartness_structure
(TTA₁ : ∀ (x y : X), x ≠ y → ∃ (U V : set X),
(τ.is_open U ∧ τ.is_open V)
∧ (x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U)
∧ (x ∉ V ∧ y ∈ V))
: point_set_apartness_space X :=
{ r := λ x y, x = y,
iseqv := eq_equivalence,
ar := λ x y, x ≠ y,
ar_not_r := λ _ _ p, p,
ar_symm := λ _ _ p, by finish,
apart := apart X τ,
ar_to_apart := begin
intros x y p,
unfold apart,
have h := TTA₁ x y p,
cases h with U h,
cases h with V h,
cases h with h0 h1,
cases h0 with oU oV,
cases h1 with h0 h1,
use U,
split,
exact oU,
split,
exact h0.1,
intros hh hhi y' hy' hhhy',
apply h0.2,
cases hy',
rw ← hhhy',
exact hhi
end,
apart_to_nin := begin
intros x A axA,
cases axA with U hUA,
cases hUA with oU huA,
cases huA with hUx hUA,
intro hxA,
specialize hUA hUx x hxA,
apply hUA,
refl,
end,
apart_union_iff_apart_and_apart := begin
intros x A B,
split,
intro axAB,
cases axAB with U axAB,
cases axAB with oU axAB,
cases axAB with hxU axAB,
split,
use U,
split,
exact oU,
split,
exact hxU,
intros x' hx',
specialize axAB hx',
intros y' hy',
specialize axAB y',
apply axAB,
exact set.mem_union_left B hy',
use U,
split,
exact oU,
split,
exact hxU,
intros x' hx',
specialize axAB hx',
intros y' hy',
specialize axAB y',
apply axAB,
exact set.mem_union_right A hy',
intro h,
cases h with h1 h2,
cases h1 with U h1,
cases h2 with U' h2,
cases h1 with oU h1,
cases h2 with oU' h2,
cases h1 with hxU h1,
cases h2 with hxU' h2,
use U ∩ U',
split,
exact topological_space.is_open_inter τ U U' oU oU',
split,
split,
exact hxU,
exact hxU',
intros x'' hx'',
cases hx'' with hx''1 hx''2,
intros y hy,
specialize h1 hx''1,
specialize h2 hx''2,
cases hy,
exact h1 y hy,
exact h2 y hy,
end,
apart_conj_to_apart := begin
intros x A B h,
cases h with h1 h2,
dsimp at *,
unfold apartness.complement at h2,
unfold apart,
cases h1 with U h1,
cases h1 with hU h1,
cases h1 with korn h1,
use U,
split,
exact hU,
split,
exact korn,
intros x' hx' y hy,
apply h2,
use U,
split,
exact hU,
split,
exact hx',
exact h1,
exact hy,
end,
apart_to_or_apart := A5 }
-- possibly need to refactor so that these definitions can be accessed
end top_apart |
e4ee62ce11ad3f662e2cc2ab54071d62f2dc03a2 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/empty_french_quote.lean | 35201c4e901a10de56a91644a4364ebbeb0cc048 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 69 | lean | def «» := not
theorem thm : «» false := id
#print «»
#print thm |
db2b73c0abbb38cb48422a7ca53fce7b20ab022d | 31f556cdeb9239ffc2fad8f905e33987ff4feab9 | /stage0/src/Lean/Compiler/LCNF/Check.lean | 61b0500380157f2532168b98e302e1663b06eca0 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | tobiasgrosser/lean4 | ce0fd9cca0feba1100656679bf41f0bffdbabb71 | ebdbdc10436a4d9d6b66acf78aae7a23f5bd073f | refs/heads/master | 1,673,103,412,948 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 186,870,185 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,665,129,237,000 | 1,557,939,901,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,456 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.InferType
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.PrettyPrinter
namespace Lean.Compiler.LCNF
namespace Check
open InferType
/-
Type and structural properties checker for LCNF expressions.
-/
structure Context where
/-- Join points that are in scope. -/
jps : FVarIdSet := {}
/-- Variables and local functions in scope -/
vars : FVarIdSet := {}
structure State where
/-- All free variables found -/
all : FVarIdHashSet := {}
abbrev CheckM := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State InferTypeM
def checkFVar (fvarId : FVarId) : CheckM Unit :=
unless (← read).vars.contains fvarId do
throwError "invalid out of scope free variable {← getBinderName fvarId}"
def checkAppArgs (f : Expr) (args : Array Expr) : CheckM Unit := do
let mut fType ← inferType f
let mut j := 0
for i in [:args.size] do
let arg := args[i]!
if fType.isAnyType then
return ()
fType := fType.headBeta
let (d, b) ←
match fType with
| .forallE _ d b _ => pure (d, b)
| _ =>
fType := fType.instantiateRevRange j i args |>.headBeta
match fType with
| .forallE _ d b _ => j := i; pure (d, b)
| _ =>
if fType.isAnyType then return ()
throwError "function expected at{indentExpr (mkAppN f args)}\narrow type expected{indentExpr fType}"
let argType ← inferType arg
let expectedType := d.instantiateRevRange j i args
unless (← InferType.compatibleTypes argType expectedType) do
throwError "type mismatch at LCNF application{indentExpr (mkAppN f args)}\nargument {arg} has type{indentExpr argType}\nbut is expected to have type{indentExpr expectedType}"
unless (← pure (maybeTypeFormerType expectedType) <||> isErasedCompatible expectedType) do
unless arg.isFVar do
throwError "invalid LCNF application{indentExpr (mkAppN f args)}\nargument{indentExpr arg}\nhas type{indentExpr expectedType}\nmust be a free variable"
checkFVar arg.fvarId!
fType := b
def checkApp (f : Expr) (args : Array Expr) : CheckM Unit := do
unless f.isConst || f.isFVar do
throwError "unexpected function application, function must be a constant or free variable{indentExpr (mkAppN f args)}"
if f.isFVar then
checkFVar f.fvarId!
checkAppArgs f args
def checkExpr (e : Expr) : CheckM Unit :=
match e with
| .lit _ => pure ()
| .app .. => checkApp e.getAppFn e.getAppArgs
| .proj _ _ (.fvar fvarId) => checkFVar fvarId
| .mdata _ (.fvar fvarId) => checkFVar fvarId
| .const _ _ => pure () -- TODO: check number of universe level parameters
| .fvar fvarId => checkFVar fvarId
| _ => throwError "unexpected expression at LCNF{indentExpr e}"
def checkJpInScope (jp : FVarId) : CheckM Unit := do
unless (← read).jps.contains jp do
/-
We cannot jump to join points defined out of the scope of a local function declaration.
For example, the following is an invalid LCNF.
```
jp_1 := fun x => ... -- Some join point
let f := fun y => -- Local function declaration.
...
jp_1 _x.n -- jump to a join point that is not in the scope of `f`.
```
-/
throwError "invalid jump to out of scope join point `{mkFVar jp}`"
def checkParam (param : Param) : CheckM Unit := do
unless param == (← getParam param.fvarId) do
throwError "LCNF parameter mismatch at `{param.binderName}`, does not value in local context"
def checkParams (params : Array Param) : CheckM Unit :=
params.forM checkParam
def checkLetDecl (letDecl : LetDecl) : CheckM Unit := do
checkExpr letDecl.value
let valueType ← inferType letDecl.value
unless (← InferType.compatibleTypes letDecl.type valueType) do
throwError "type mismatch at `{letDecl.binderName}`, value has type{indentExpr valueType}\nbut is expected to have type{indentExpr letDecl.type}"
unless letDecl == (← getLetDecl letDecl.fvarId) do
throwError "LCNF let declaration mismatch at `{letDecl.binderName}`, does not match value in local context"
def addFVarId (fvarId : FVarId) : CheckM Unit := do
if (← get).all.contains fvarId then
throwError "invalid LCNF, free variables are not unique `{fvarId.name}`"
modify fun s => { s with all := s.all.insert fvarId }
@[inline] def withFVarId (fvarId : FVarId) (x : CheckM α) : CheckM α := do
addFVarId fvarId
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with vars := ctx.vars.insert fvarId }) x
@[inline] def withJp (fvarId : FVarId) (x : CheckM α) : CheckM α := do
addFVarId fvarId
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with jps := ctx.jps.insert fvarId }) x
@[inline] def withParams (params : Array Param) (x : CheckM α) : CheckM α := do
params.forM (addFVarId ·.fvarId)
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with vars := params.foldl (init := ctx.vars) fun vars p => vars.insert p.fvarId })
x
mutual
partial def checkFunDeclCore (declName : Name) (type : Expr) (params : Array Param) (value : Code) : CheckM Unit := do
checkParams params
let valueType ← withParams params do
mkForallParams params (← check value)
unless (← InferType.compatibleTypes type valueType) do
throwError "type mismatch at `{declName}`, value has type{indentExpr valueType}\nbut is expected to have type{indentExpr type}"
partial def checkFunDecl (funDecl : FunDecl) : CheckM Unit := do
checkFunDeclCore funDecl.binderName funDecl.type funDecl.params funDecl.value
let decl ← getFunDecl funDecl.fvarId
unless decl.binderName == funDecl.binderName do
throwError "LCNF local function declaration mismatch at `{funDecl.binderName}`, binder name in local context `{decl.binderName}`"
unless decl.type == funDecl.type do
throwError "LCNF local function declaration mismatch at `{funDecl.binderName}`, type in local context{indentExpr decl.type}\nexpected{indentExpr funDecl.type}"
unless (← getFunDecl funDecl.fvarId) == funDecl do
throwError "LCNF local function declaration mismatch at `{funDecl.binderName}`, declaration in local context does match"
partial def checkCases (c : Cases) : CheckM Expr := do
let mut ctorNames : NameSet := {}
let mut hasDefault := false
checkFVar c.discr
let discrType ← LCNF.getType c.discr
unless discrType.isAnyType do
let .const declName _ := discrType.headBeta.getAppFn | throwError "unexpected LCNF discriminant type {discrType}"
unless c.typeName == declName do
throwError "invalid LCNF `{c.typeName}.casesOn`, discriminant has type{indentExpr discrType}"
for alt in c.alts do
let type ←
match alt with
| .default k => hasDefault := true; check k
| .alt ctorName params k =>
checkParams params
if ctorNames.contains ctorName then
throwError "invalid LCNF `cases`, alternative `{ctorName}` occurs more than once"
ctorNames := ctorNames.insert ctorName
let .ctorInfo val ← getConstInfo ctorName | throwError "invalid LCNF `cases`, `{ctorName}` is not a constructor name"
unless val.induct == c.typeName do
throwError "invalid LCNF `cases`, `{ctorName}` is not a constructor of `{c.typeName}`"
unless params.size == val.numFields do
throwError "invalid LCNF `cases`, `{ctorName}` has # {val.numFields} fields, but alternative has # {params.size} alternatives"
-- TODO: check whether the ctor field types as parameter types match.
withParams params do check k
unless (← InferType.compatibleTypes type c.resultType) do
throwError "type mismatch at LCNF `cases` alternative\nhas type{indentExpr type}\nbut is expected to have type{indentExpr c.resultType}"
return c.resultType
partial def check (code : Code) : CheckM Expr := do
match code with
| .let decl k => checkLetDecl decl; withFVarId decl.fvarId do check k
| .fun decl k =>
-- Remark: local function declarations should not jump to out of scope join points
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with jps := {} }) do checkFunDecl decl
withFVarId decl.fvarId do check k
| .jp decl k => checkFunDecl decl; withJp decl.fvarId do check k
| .cases c => checkCases c
| .jmp fvarId args =>
checkJpInScope fvarId
let decl ← getFunDecl fvarId
unless decl.getArity == args.size do
throwError "invalid LCNF `jmp`, join point has #{decl.getArity} parameters, but #{args.size} were provided"
checkAppArgs (.fvar fvarId) args; code.inferType
| .return fvarId => checkFVar fvarId; code.inferType
| .unreach .. => code.inferType
end
def run (x : CheckM α) : CompilerM α :=
x |>.run {} |>.run' {} |>.run {}
end Check
def Decl.check (decl : Decl) : CompilerM Unit := do
Check.run do Check.checkFunDeclCore decl.name decl.type decl.params decl.value
/--
Check whether every local declaration in the local context is used in one of given `decls`.
-/
partial def checkDeadLocalDecls (decls : Array Decl) : CompilerM Unit := do
let (_, s) := visitDecls decls |>.run {}
let usesFVar (binderName : Name) (fvarId : FVarId) :=
unless s.contains fvarId do
throwError "LCNF local context contains unused local variable declaration `{binderName}`"
let lctx := (← get).lctx
lctx.params.forM fun fvarId decl => usesFVar decl.binderName fvarId
lctx.letDecls.forM fun fvarId decl => usesFVar decl.binderName fvarId
lctx.funDecls.forM fun fvarId decl => usesFVar decl.binderName fvarId
where
visitFVar (fvarId : FVarId) : StateM FVarIdHashSet Unit :=
modify (·.insert fvarId)
visitParam (param : Param) : StateM FVarIdHashSet Unit := do
visitFVar param.fvarId
visitParams (params : Array Param) : StateM FVarIdHashSet Unit := do
params.forM visitParam
visitCode (code : Code) : StateM FVarIdHashSet Unit := do
match code with
| .jmp .. | .return .. | .unreach .. => return ()
| .let decl k => visitFVar decl.fvarId; visitCode k
| .fun decl k | .jp decl k =>
visitFVar decl.fvarId; visitParams decl.params; visitCode decl.value
visitCode k
| .cases c => c.alts.forM fun alt => do
match alt with
| .default k => visitCode k
| .alt _ ps k => visitParams ps; visitCode k
visitDecl (decl : Decl) : StateM FVarIdHashSet Unit := do
visitParams decl.params
visitCode decl.value
visitDecls (decls : Array Decl) : StateM FVarIdHashSet Unit :=
decls.forM visitDecl
end Lean.Compiler.LCNF
|
5a118f298355e2b33815ea0f4e7dba6ef75fae87 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/meta/expr_lens.lean | 1611ea91c514ae7c491b4ee2d74b27b0c4557212 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,699 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Keeley Hoek. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Keeley Hoek, Scott Morrison
-/
import meta.expr
/-!
# A lens for zooming into nested `expr` applications
A "lens" for looking into the subterms of an expression, tracking where we've been, so that
when we "zoom out" after making a change we know exactly which order of `congr_fun`s and
`congr_arg`s we need to make things work.
This file defines the `expr_lens` inductive type, defines basic operations this type, and defines a
useful map-like function `expr.app_map` on `expr`s which maps over applications.
This file is for non-tactics.
## Tags
expr, expr_lens, congr, environment, meta, metaprogramming, tactic
-/
/-! ### Declarations about `expr_lens` -/
/-- You're supposed to think of an `expr_lens` as a big set of nested applications with a single
hole which needs to be filled, either in a function spot or argument spot. `expr_lens.fill` can
fill this hole and turn your lens back into a real `expr`. -/
meta inductive expr_lens
| app_fun : expr_lens → expr → expr_lens
| app_arg : expr_lens → expr → expr_lens
| entire : expr_lens
namespace expr_lens
/-- Inductive type with two constructors `F` and `A`,
that represent the function-part `f` and arg-part `a` of an application `f a`. They specify the
directions in which an `expr_lens` should zoom into an `expr`.
This type is used in the development of rewriting tactics such as `nth_rewrite` and
`rewrite_search`. -/
@[derive [decidable_eq, inhabited]]
inductive dir
| F
| A
/-- String representation of `dir`. -/
def dir.to_string : dir → string
| dir.F := "F"
| dir.A := "A"
instance : has_to_string dir := ⟨dir.to_string⟩
open tactic
/-- Fill the function or argument hole in this lens with the given `expr`. -/
meta def fill : expr_lens → expr → expr
| entire e := e
| (app_fun l f) x := l.fill (expr.app f x)
| (app_arg l x) f := l.fill (expr.app f x)
/-- Zoom into `e : expr` given the context of an `expr_lens`, popping out an `expr` and a new
zoomed `expr_lens`, if this is possible (`e` has to be an application). -/
meta def zoom : expr_lens → list dir → expr → option (expr_lens × expr)
| l [] e := (l, e)
| l (dir.F :: rest) (expr.app f x) := (expr_lens.app_arg l x).zoom rest f
| l (dir.A :: rest) (expr.app f x) := (expr_lens.app_fun l f).zoom rest x
| _ _ _ := none
/-- Convert an `expr_lens` into a list of instructions needed to build it; repeatedly inspecting a
function or its argument a finite number of times. -/
meta def to_dirs : expr_lens → list dir
| expr_lens.entire := []
| (expr_lens.app_fun l _) := l.to_dirs.concat dir.A
| (expr_lens.app_arg l _) := l.to_dirs.concat dir.F
/-- Sometimes `mk_congr_arg` fails, when the function is 'superficially dependent'.
Try to `dsimp` the function first before building the `congr_arg` expression. -/
meta def mk_congr_arg_using_dsimp (G W : expr) (u : list name) : tactic expr :=
do s ← simp_lemmas.mk_default,
t ← infer_type G,
t' ← s.dsimplify u t { fail_if_unchanged := ff },
to_expr ```(congr_arg (show %%t', from %%G) %%W)
private meta def trace_congr_error (f : expr) (x_eq : expr) : tactic unit :=
do pp_f ← pp f,
pp_f_t ← (infer_type f >>= λ t, pp t),
pp_x_eq ← pp x_eq,
pp_x_eq_t ← (infer_type x_eq >>= λ t, pp t),
trace format!"expr_lens.congr failed on \n{pp_f} : {pp_f_t}\n{pp_x_eq} : {pp_x_eq_t}"
/-- Turn an `e : expr_lens` and a proof that `a = b` into a series of `congr_arg` or `congr_fun`
applications showing that the expressions obtained from `e.fill a` and `e.fill b` are equal. -/
meta def congr : expr_lens → expr → tactic expr
| entire e_eq := pure e_eq
| (app_fun l f) x_eq := do fx_eq ← try_core $ do {
mk_congr_arg f x_eq
<|> mk_congr_arg_using_dsimp f x_eq [`has_coe_to_fun.F] },
match fx_eq with
| (some fx_eq) := l.congr fx_eq
| none := trace_congr_error f x_eq >> failed
end
| (app_arg l x) f_eq := mk_congr_fun f_eq x >>= l.congr
/-- Pretty print a lens. -/
meta def to_tactic_string : expr_lens → tactic string
| entire := return "(entire)"
| (app_fun l f) := do pp ← pp f,
rest ← l.to_tactic_string,
return sformat!"(fun \"{pp}\" {rest})"
| (app_arg l x) := do pp ← pp x,
rest ← l.to_tactic_string,
return sformat!"(arg \"{pp}\" {rest})"
end expr_lens
namespace expr
/-- The private internal function used by `app_map`, which "does the work". -/
private meta def app_map_aux {α} (F : expr_lens → expr → tactic (list α)) :
option (expr_lens × expr) → tactic (list α)
| (some (l, e)) := list.join <$> monad.sequence [
F l e,
app_map_aux $ l.zoom [expr_lens.dir.F] e,
app_map_aux $ l.zoom [expr_lens.dir.A] e
] <|> pure []
| none := pure []
/-- `app_map F e` maps a function `F` which understands `expr_lens`es
over the given `e : expr` in the natural way;
that is, make holes in `e` everywhere where that is possible
(generating `expr_lens`es in the process),
and at each stage call the function `F` passing
both the `expr_lens` generated and the `expr` which was removed to make the hole.
At each stage `F` returns a list of some type, and `app_map` collects these lists together and
returns a concatenation of them all. -/
meta def app_map {α} (F : expr_lens → expr → tactic (list α)) (e : expr) : tactic (list α) :=
app_map_aux F (expr_lens.entire, e)
end expr
|
f4fc72738e5aafaac339e686890d5e55aeda502d | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebraic_geometry/AffineScheme.lean | a03d6f223f6a66b88f9e05e8bd9e88079c1592bf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,345 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import algebraic_geometry.Gamma_Spec_adjunction
import algebraic_geometry.open_immersion
import category_theory.limits.opposites
import ring_theory.localization.inv_submonoid
/-!
# Affine schemes
We define the category of `AffineScheme`s as the essential image of `Spec`.
We also define predicates about affine schemes and affine open sets.
## Main definitions
* `algebraic_geometry.AffineScheme`: The category of affine schemes.
* `algebraic_geometry.is_affine`: A scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an
isomorphism.
* `algebraic_geometry.Scheme.iso_Spec`: The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine
scheme.
* `algebraic_geometry.AffineScheme.equiv_CommRing`: The equivalence of categories
`AffineScheme ≌ CommRingᵒᵖ` given by `AffineScheme.Spec : CommRingᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme` and
`AffineScheme.Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRing`.
* `algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open`: An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is
affine.
* `algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open.from_Spec`: The immersion `Spec 𝒪ₓ(U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open category_theory category_theory.limits opposite topological_space
universe u
namespace algebraic_geometry
open Spec (structure_sheaf)
/-- The category of affine schemes -/
@[derive category, nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def AffineScheme := Scheme.Spec.ess_image_subcategory
/-- A Scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an isomorphism. -/
class is_affine (X : Scheme) : Prop :=
(affine : is_iso (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app X))
attribute [instance] is_affine.affine
/-- The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine scheme. -/
def Scheme.iso_Spec (X : Scheme) [is_affine X] :
X ≅ Scheme.Spec.obj (op $ Scheme.Γ.obj $ op X) :=
as_iso (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app X)
/-- Construct an affine scheme from a scheme and the information that it is affine.
Also see `AffineScheme.of` for a typclass version. -/
@[simps]
def AffineScheme.mk (X : Scheme) (h : is_affine X) : AffineScheme :=
⟨X, @@mem_ess_image_of_unit_is_iso _ _ _ _ h.1⟩
/-- Construct an affine scheme from a scheme. Also see `AffineScheme.mk` for a non-typeclass
version. -/
def AffineScheme.of (X : Scheme) [h : is_affine X] : AffineScheme :=
AffineScheme.mk X h
/-- Type check a morphism of schemes as a morphism in `AffineScheme`. -/
def AffineScheme.of_hom {X Y : Scheme} [is_affine X] [is_affine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
AffineScheme.of X ⟶ AffineScheme.of Y :=
f
lemma mem_Spec_ess_image (X : Scheme) : X ∈ Scheme.Spec.ess_image ↔ is_affine X :=
⟨λ h, ⟨functor.ess_image.unit_is_iso h⟩, λ h, @@mem_ess_image_of_unit_is_iso _ _ _ X h.1⟩
instance is_affine_AffineScheme (X : AffineScheme.{u}) : is_affine X.obj :=
⟨functor.ess_image.unit_is_iso X.property⟩
instance Spec_is_affine (R : CommRingᵒᵖ) : is_affine (Scheme.Spec.obj R) :=
algebraic_geometry.is_affine_AffineScheme ⟨_, Scheme.Spec.obj_mem_ess_image R⟩
lemma is_affine_of_iso {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] [h : is_affine Y] :
is_affine X :=
by { rw [← mem_Spec_ess_image] at h ⊢, exact functor.ess_image.of_iso (as_iso f).symm h }
namespace AffineScheme
/-- The `Spec` functor into the category of affine schemes. -/
@[derive [full, faithful, ess_surj]]
def Spec : CommRingᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme := Scheme.Spec.to_ess_image
/-- The forgetful functor `AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme`. -/
@[derive [full, faithful], simps]
def forget_to_Scheme : AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme := Scheme.Spec.ess_image_inclusion
/-- The global section functor of an affine scheme. -/
def Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRing := forget_to_Scheme.op ⋙ Scheme.Γ
/-- The category of affine schemes is equivalent to the category of commutative rings. -/
def equiv_CommRing : AffineScheme ≌ CommRingᵒᵖ :=
equiv_ess_image_of_reflective.symm
instance Γ_is_equiv : is_equivalence Γ.{u} :=
begin
haveI : is_equivalence Γ.{u}.right_op.op := is_equivalence.of_equivalence equiv_CommRing.op,
exact (functor.is_equivalence_trans Γ.{u}.right_op.op (op_op_equivalence _).functor : _),
end
instance : has_colimits AffineScheme.{u} :=
begin
haveI := adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence.{u} Γ.{u},
exactI adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence.{u} (op_op_equivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
end
instance : has_limits AffineScheme.{u} :=
begin
haveI := adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence Γ.{u},
haveI : has_limits AffineScheme.{u} ᵒᵖᵒᵖ := limits.has_limits_op_of_has_colimits,
exactI adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence (op_op_equivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
end
noncomputable
instance : preserves_limits Γ.{u}.right_op :=
@@adjunction.is_equivalence_preserves_limits _ _ Γ.right_op
(is_equivalence.of_equivalence equiv_CommRing)
noncomputable
instance : preserves_limits forget_to_Scheme :=
begin
apply_with (@@preserves_limits_of_nat_iso _ _
(iso_whisker_right equiv_CommRing.unit_iso forget_to_Scheme).symm) { instances := ff },
change preserves_limits (equiv_CommRing.functor ⋙ Scheme.Spec),
apply_instance,
end
end AffineScheme
/-- An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is affine. -/
def is_affine_open {X : Scheme} (U : opens X.carrier) : Prop :=
is_affine (X.restrict U.open_embedding)
/-- The set of affine opens as a subset of `opens X.carrier`. -/
def Scheme.affine_opens (X : Scheme) : set (opens X.carrier) :=
{ U : opens X.carrier | is_affine_open U }
lemma range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion {X Y : Scheme} [is_affine X] (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : is_open_immersion f] : is_affine_open f.opens_range :=
begin
refine is_affine_of_iso (is_open_immersion.iso_of_range_eq f (Y.of_restrict _) _).inv,
exact subtype.range_coe.symm,
apply_instance
end
lemma top_is_affine_open (X : Scheme) [is_affine X] : is_affine_open (⊤ : opens X.carrier) :=
begin
convert range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion (𝟙 X),
ext1,
exact set.range_id.symm
end
instance Scheme.affine_cover_is_affine (X : Scheme) (i : X.affine_cover.J) :
is_affine (X.affine_cover.obj i) :=
algebraic_geometry.Spec_is_affine _
instance Scheme.affine_basis_cover_is_affine (X : Scheme) (i : X.affine_basis_cover.J) :
is_affine (X.affine_basis_cover.obj i) :=
algebraic_geometry.Spec_is_affine _
lemma is_basis_affine_open (X : Scheme) :
opens.is_basis X.affine_opens :=
begin
rw opens.is_basis_iff_nbhd,
rintros U x (hU : x ∈ (U : set X.carrier)),
obtain ⟨S, hS, hxS, hSU⟩ := X.affine_basis_cover_is_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open hU U.prop,
refine ⟨⟨S, X.affine_basis_cover_is_basis.is_open hS⟩, _, hxS, hSU⟩,
rcases hS with ⟨i, rfl⟩,
exact range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion _,
end
/-- The open immersion `Spec 𝒪ₓ(U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`. -/
def is_affine_open.from_Spec {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
Scheme.Spec.obj (op $ X.presheaf.obj $ op U) ⟶ X :=
begin
haveI : is_affine (X.restrict U.open_embedding) := hU,
have : U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤ = U,
{ ext1, exact set.image_univ.trans subtype.range_coe },
exact Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom this.symm).op).op ≫
(X.restrict U.open_embedding).iso_Spec.inv ≫ X.of_restrict _
end
instance is_affine_open.is_open_immersion_from_Spec {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) :
is_open_immersion hU.from_Spec :=
by { delta is_affine_open.from_Spec, apply_instance }
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_range {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
set.range hU.from_Spec.1.base = (U : set X.carrier) :=
begin
delta is_affine_open.from_Spec,
erw [← category.assoc, Scheme.comp_val_base],
rw [coe_comp, set.range_comp, set.range_iff_surjective.mpr, set.image_univ],
exact subtype.range_coe,
rw ← Top.epi_iff_surjective,
apply_instance
end
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_image_top {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) :
hU.is_open_immersion_from_Spec.base_open.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤ = U :=
by { ext1, exact set.image_univ.trans hU.from_Spec_range }
lemma is_affine_open.is_compact {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
is_compact (U : set X.carrier) :=
begin
convert @is_compact.image _ _ _ _ set.univ hU.from_Spec.1.base
prime_spectrum.compact_space.1 (by continuity),
convert hU.from_Spec_range.symm,
exact set.image_univ
end
lemma is_affine_open.image_is_open_immersion {X Y : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U)
(f : X ⟶ Y) [H : is_open_immersion f] : is_affine_open (f.opens_functor.obj U) :=
begin
haveI : is_affine _ := hU,
convert range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion (X.of_restrict U.open_embedding ≫ f),
ext1,
change f.1.base '' U.1 = set.range (f.1.base ∘ coe),
rw [set.range_comp, subtype.range_coe],
end
lemma is_affine_open_iff_of_is_open_immersion {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : is_open_immersion f]
(U : opens X.carrier) :
is_affine_open (H.open_functor.obj U) ↔ is_affine_open U :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hU, @@is_affine_of_iso _ _ hU, λ hU, hU.image_is_open_immersion f⟩,
refine (is_open_immersion.iso_of_range_eq (X.of_restrict _ ≫ f) (Y.of_restrict _) _).hom,
{ rw [Scheme.comp_val_base, coe_comp, set.range_comp],
dsimp [opens.inclusion],
rw [subtype.range_coe, subtype.range_coe],
refl },
{ apply_instance }
end
instance Scheme.quasi_compact_of_affine (X : Scheme) [is_affine X] : compact_space X.carrier :=
⟨(top_is_affine_open X).is_compact⟩
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_base_preimage
{X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
(opens.map hU.from_Spec.val.base).obj U = ⊤ :=
begin
ext1,
change hU.from_Spec.1.base ⁻¹' (U : set X.carrier) = set.univ,
rw [← hU.from_Spec_range, ← set.image_univ],
exact set.preimage_image_eq _ PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.base_open.inj
end
lemma Scheme.Spec_map_presheaf_map_eq_to_hom {X : Scheme} {U V : opens X.carrier} (h : U = V) (W) :
(Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom h).op).op).val.c.app W =
eq_to_hom (by { cases h, dsimp, induction W using opposite.rec, congr, ext1, simpa }) :=
begin
have : Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (𝟙 (op U))).op = 𝟙 _,
{ rw [X.presheaf.map_id, op_id, Scheme.Spec.map_id] },
cases h,
refine (Scheme.congr_app this _).trans _,
erw category.id_comp,
simpa [eq_to_hom_map],
end
lemma is_affine_open.Spec_Γ_identity_hom_app_from_Spec {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) :
(Spec_Γ_identity.hom.app (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)) ≫ hU.from_Spec.1.c.app (op U) =
(Scheme.Spec.obj _).presheaf.map (eq_to_hom hU.from_Spec_base_preimage).op :=
begin
haveI : is_affine _ := hU,
have e₁ :=
Spec_Γ_identity.hom.naturality (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom U.open_embedding_obj_top).op),
rw ← is_iso.comp_inv_eq at e₁,
have e₂ := Γ_Spec.adjunction_unit_app_app_top (X.restrict U.open_embedding),
erw ← e₂ at e₁,
simp only [functor.id_map, quiver.hom.unop_op, functor.comp_map, ← functor.map_inv, ← op_inv,
LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_map, category.assoc, functor.right_op_map, inv_eq_to_hom] at e₁,
delta is_affine_open.from_Spec Scheme.iso_Spec,
rw [Scheme.comp_val_c_app, Scheme.comp_val_c_app, ← e₁],
simp_rw category.assoc,
erw ← X.presheaf.map_comp_assoc,
rw ← op_comp,
have e₃ : U.open_embedding.is_open_map.adjunction.counit.app U ≫
eq_to_hom U.open_embedding_obj_top.symm =
U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.map (eq_to_hom U.inclusion_map_eq_top) :=
subsingleton.elim _ _,
have e₄ : X.presheaf.map _ ≫ _ = _ :=
(as_iso (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app (X.restrict U.open_embedding)))
.inv.1.c.naturality_assoc (eq_to_hom U.inclusion_map_eq_top).op _,
erw [e₃, e₄, ← Scheme.comp_val_c_app_assoc, iso.inv_hom_id],
simp only [eq_to_hom_map, eq_to_hom_op, Scheme.Spec_map_presheaf_map_eq_to_hom],
erw [Scheme.Spec_map_presheaf_map_eq_to_hom, category.id_comp],
simpa only [eq_to_hom_trans]
end
@[elementwise]
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_app_eq {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) :
hU.from_Spec.1.c.app (op U) = Spec_Γ_identity.inv.app (X.presheaf.obj $ op U) ≫
(Scheme.Spec.obj _).presheaf.map (eq_to_hom hU.from_Spec_base_preimage).op :=
by rw [← hU.Spec_Γ_identity_hom_app_from_Spec, iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
lemma is_affine_open.basic_open_is_affine {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) : is_affine_open (X.basic_open f) :=
begin
convert range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion (Scheme.Spec.map (CommRing.of_hom
(algebra_map (X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (localization.away f))).op ≫ hU.from_Spec),
ext1,
have : hU.from_Spec.val.base '' (hU.from_Spec.val.base ⁻¹' (X.basic_open f : set X.carrier)) =
(X.basic_open f : set X.carrier),
{ rw [set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, set.inter_eq_left_iff_subset, hU.from_Spec_range],
exact Scheme.basic_open_le _ _ },
rw [Scheme.hom.opens_range_coe, Scheme.comp_val_base, ← this, coe_comp, set.range_comp],
congr' 1,
refine (congr_arg coe $ Scheme.preimage_basic_open hU.from_Spec f).trans _,
refine eq.trans _ (prime_spectrum.localization_away_comap_range (localization.away f) f).symm,
congr' 1,
have : (opens.map hU.from_Spec.val.base).obj U = ⊤,
{ ext1,
change hU.from_Spec.1.base ⁻¹' (U : set X.carrier) = set.univ,
rw [← hU.from_Spec_range, ← set.image_univ],
exact set.preimage_image_eq _ PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.base_open.inj },
refine eq.trans _ (basic_open_eq_of_affine f),
have lm : ∀ s, (opens.map hU.from_Spec.val.base).obj U ⊓ s = s := λ s, this.symm ▸ top_inf_eq,
refine eq.trans _ (lm _),
refine eq.trans _
((Scheme.Spec.obj $ op $ X.presheaf.obj $ op U).basic_open_res _ (eq_to_hom this).op),
rw ← comp_apply,
congr' 2,
rw iso.eq_inv_comp,
erw hU.Spec_Γ_identity_hom_app_from_Spec,
end
lemma is_affine_open.map_restrict_basic_open {X : Scheme} (r : X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤))
{U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
is_affine_open ((opens.map (X.of_restrict (X.basic_open r).open_embedding).1.base).obj U) :=
begin
apply (is_affine_open_iff_of_is_open_immersion
(X.of_restrict (X.basic_open r).open_embedding) _).mp,
delta PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.open_functor,
dsimp,
rw [opens.functor_obj_map_obj, opens.open_embedding_obj_top, inf_comm,
← Scheme.basic_open_res _ _ (hom_of_le le_top).op],
exact hU.basic_open_is_affine _,
end
lemma Scheme.map_prime_spectrum_basic_open_of_affine (X : Scheme) [is_affine X]
(f : Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)) :
(opens.map X.iso_Spec.hom.1.base).obj (prime_spectrum.basic_open f) = X.basic_open f :=
begin
rw ← basic_open_eq_of_affine,
transitivity (opens.map X.iso_Spec.hom.1.base).obj ((Scheme.Spec.obj
(op (Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)))).basic_open ((inv (X.iso_Spec.hom.1.c.app
(op ((opens.map (inv X.iso_Spec.hom).val.base).obj ⊤)))) ((X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom _)) f))),
congr,
{ rw [← is_iso.inv_eq_inv, is_iso.inv_inv, is_iso.iso.inv_inv, nat_iso.app_hom],
erw ← Γ_Spec.adjunction_unit_app_app_top,
refl },
{ rw eq_to_hom_map, refl },
{ dsimp, congr },
{ refine (Scheme.preimage_basic_open _ _).trans _,
rw [is_iso.inv_hom_id_apply, Scheme.basic_open_res_eq] }
end
lemma is_basis_basic_open (X : Scheme) [is_affine X] :
opens.is_basis (set.range (X.basic_open : X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤) → opens X.carrier)) :=
begin
delta opens.is_basis,
convert prime_spectrum.is_basis_basic_opens.inducing
(Top.homeo_of_iso (Scheme.forget_to_Top.map_iso X.iso_Spec)).inducing using 1,
ext,
simp only [set.mem_image, exists_exists_eq_and],
split,
{ rintro ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, _⟩,
exact congr_arg subtype.val (X.map_prime_spectrum_basic_open_of_affine x) },
{ rintro ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, _⟩,
exact congr_arg subtype.val (X.map_prime_spectrum_basic_open_of_affine x).symm }
end
lemma is_affine_open.exists_basic_open_le {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) {V : opens X.carrier} (x : V) (h : ↑x ∈ U) :
∃ f : X.presheaf.obj (op U), X.basic_open f ≤ V ∧ ↑x ∈ X.basic_open f :=
begin
haveI : is_affine _ := hU,
obtain ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨r, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ := (is_basis_basic_open (X.restrict U.open_embedding))
.exists_subset_of_mem_open _ ((opens.map U.inclusion).obj V).prop,
swap, exact ⟨x, h⟩,
have : U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ((X.restrict U.open_embedding).basic_open r)
= X.basic_open (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom U.open_embedding_obj_top.symm).op r),
{ refine (Scheme.image_basic_open (X.of_restrict U.open_embedding) r).trans _,
erw ← Scheme.basic_open_res_eq _ _ (eq_to_hom U.open_embedding_obj_top).op,
rw [← comp_apply, ← category_theory.functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, eq_to_hom_trans,
eq_to_hom_refl, op_id, category_theory.functor.map_id, Scheme.hom.inv_app],
erw PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.of_restrict_inv_app,
congr },
use X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom U.open_embedding_obj_top.symm).op r,
rw ← this,
exact ⟨set.image_subset_iff.mpr h₂, set.mem_image_of_mem _ h₁⟩,
exact x.prop,
end
instance {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :
algebra (X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (X.presheaf.obj (op $ X.basic_open f)) :=
(X.presheaf.map (hom_of_le $ RingedSpace.basic_open_le _ f : _ ⟶ U).op).to_algebra
lemma is_affine_open.opens_map_from_Spec_basic_open {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :
(opens.map hU.from_Spec.val.base).obj (X.basic_open f) =
RingedSpace.basic_open _ (Spec_Γ_identity.inv.app (X.presheaf.obj $ op U) f) :=
begin
erw LocallyRingedSpace.preimage_basic_open,
refine eq.trans _ (RingedSpace.basic_open_res_eq (Scheme.Spec.obj $ op $ X.presheaf.obj (op U))
.to_LocallyRingedSpace.to_RingedSpace (eq_to_hom hU.from_Spec_base_preimage).op _),
congr,
rw ← comp_apply,
congr,
erw ← hU.Spec_Γ_identity_hom_app_from_Spec,
rw iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc,
end
/-- The canonical map `Γ(𝒪ₓ, D(f)) ⟶ Γ(Spec 𝒪ₓ(U), D(Spec_Γ_identity.inv f))`
This is an isomorphism, as witnessed by an `is_iso` instance. -/
def basic_open_sections_to_affine {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U)
(f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) : X.presheaf.obj (op $ X.basic_open f) ⟶
(Scheme.Spec.obj $ op $ X.presheaf.obj (op U)).presheaf.obj
(op $ Scheme.basic_open _ $ Spec_Γ_identity.inv.app (X.presheaf.obj (op U)) f) :=
hU.from_Spec.1.c.app (op $ X.basic_open f) ≫ (Scheme.Spec.obj $ op $ X.presheaf.obj (op U))
.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom $ (hU.opens_map_from_Spec_basic_open f).symm).op
instance {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U)
(f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) : is_iso (basic_open_sections_to_affine hU f) :=
begin
delta basic_open_sections_to_affine,
apply_with is_iso.comp_is_iso { instances := ff },
{ apply PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.is_iso_of_subset,
rw hU.from_Spec_range,
exact RingedSpace.basic_open_le _ _ },
apply_instance
end
.
lemma is_localization_basic_open {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U)
(f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :
is_localization.away f (X.presheaf.obj (op $ X.basic_open f)) :=
begin
apply (is_localization.is_localization_iff_of_ring_equiv (submonoid.powers f)
(as_iso $ basic_open_sections_to_affine hU f ≫ (Scheme.Spec.obj _).presheaf.map
(eq_to_hom (basic_open_eq_of_affine _).symm).op).CommRing_iso_to_ring_equiv).mpr,
convert structure_sheaf.is_localization.to_basic_open _ f,
change _ ≫ (basic_open_sections_to_affine hU f ≫ _) = _,
delta basic_open_sections_to_affine,
erw ring_hom.algebra_map_to_algebra,
simp only [Scheme.comp_val_c_app, category.assoc],
erw hU.from_Spec.val.c.naturality_assoc,
rw hU.from_Spec_app_eq,
dsimp,
simp only [category.assoc, ← functor.map_comp, ← op_comp],
apply structure_sheaf.to_open_res,
end
instance {X : Scheme} [is_affine X] (r : X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤)) :
is_localization.away r (X.presheaf.obj (op $ X.basic_open r)) :=
is_localization_basic_open (top_is_affine_open X) r
lemma is_localization_of_eq_basic_open {X : Scheme} {U V : opens X.carrier} (i : V ⟶ U)
(hU : is_affine_open U) (r : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (e : V = X.basic_open r) :
@@is_localization.away _ r (X.presheaf.obj (op V)) _ (X.presheaf.map i.op).to_algebra :=
by { subst e, convert is_localization_basic_open hU r using 3 }
instance Γ_restrict_algebra
{X : Scheme} {Y : Top} {f : Y ⟶ X.carrier} (hf : open_embedding f) :
algebra (Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)) (Scheme.Γ.obj (op $ X.restrict hf)) :=
(Scheme.Γ.map (X.of_restrict hf).op).to_algebra
instance Γ_restrict_is_localization (X : Scheme.{u}) [is_affine X] (r : Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)) :
is_localization.away r (Scheme.Γ.obj (op $ X.restrict (X.basic_open r).open_embedding)) :=
is_localization_of_eq_basic_open _ (top_is_affine_open X) r (opens.open_embedding_obj_top _)
lemma basic_open_basic_open_is_basic_open {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (g : X.presheaf.obj (op $ X.basic_open f)) :
∃ f' : X.presheaf.obj (op U), X.basic_open f' = X.basic_open g :=
begin
haveI := is_localization_basic_open hU f,
obtain ⟨x, ⟨_, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := is_localization.surj' (submonoid.powers f) g,
use f * x,
rw [algebra.smul_def, Scheme.basic_open_mul, Scheme.basic_open_mul],
erw Scheme.basic_open_res,
refine (inf_eq_left.mpr _).symm,
convert inf_le_left using 1,
apply Scheme.basic_open_of_is_unit,
apply submonoid.left_inv_le_is_unit _ (is_localization.to_inv_submonoid (submonoid.powers f)
(X.presheaf.obj (op $ X.basic_open f)) _).prop
end
lemma exists_basic_open_le_affine_inter {X : Scheme} {U V : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (hV : is_affine_open V) (x : X.carrier) (hx : x ∈ U ∩ V) :
∃ (f : X.presheaf.obj $ op U) (g : X.presheaf.obj $ op V),
X.basic_open f = X.basic_open g ∧ x ∈ X.basic_open f :=
begin
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ := hU.exists_basic_open_le ⟨x, hx.2⟩ hx.1,
obtain ⟨g, hg₁, hg₂⟩ := hV.exists_basic_open_le ⟨x, hf₂⟩ hx.2,
obtain ⟨f', hf'⟩ := basic_open_basic_open_is_basic_open hU f
(X.presheaf.map (hom_of_le hf₁ : _ ⟶ V).op g),
replace hf' := (hf'.trans (RingedSpace.basic_open_res _ _ _)).trans (inf_eq_right.mpr hg₁),
exact ⟨f', g, hf', hf'.symm ▸ hg₂⟩
end
/-- The prime ideal of `𝒪ₓ(U)` corresponding to a point `x : U`. -/
noncomputable
def is_affine_open.prime_ideal_of {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (x : U) :
prime_spectrum (X.presheaf.obj $ op U) :=
((Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom $
show U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤ = U, from
opens.ext (set.image_univ.trans subtype.range_coe)).op).op).1.base
((@@Scheme.iso_Spec (X.restrict U.open_embedding) hU).hom.1.base x))
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_prime_ideal_of {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (x : U) :
hU.from_Spec.val.base (hU.prime_ideal_of x) = x.1 :=
begin
dsimp only [is_affine_open.from_Spec, subtype.coe_mk],
erw [← Scheme.comp_val_base_apply, ← Scheme.comp_val_base_apply],
simpa only [← functor.map_comp_assoc, ← functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, eq_to_hom_trans, op_id,
eq_to_hom_refl, category_theory.functor.map_id, category.id_comp, iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
end
lemma is_affine_open.is_localization_stalk_aux {X : Scheme} (U : opens X.carrier)
[is_affine (X.restrict U.open_embedding)] :
(inv (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app (X.restrict U.open_embedding))).1.c.app
(op ((opens.map U.inclusion).obj U)) =
X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom $ by rw opens.inclusion_map_eq_top :
U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤ ⟶
(U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ((opens.map U.inclusion).obj U))).op ≫
to_Spec_Γ (X.presheaf.obj $ op (U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤)) ≫
(Scheme.Spec.obj $ op $ X.presheaf.obj $ _).presheaf.map
(eq_to_hom (by { rw [opens.inclusion_map_eq_top], refl }) : unop _ ⟶ ⊤).op :=
begin
have e : (opens.map (inv (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app (X.restrict U.open_embedding))).1.base).obj
((opens.map U.inclusion).obj U) = ⊤,
by { rw [opens.inclusion_map_eq_top], refl },
rw [Scheme.inv_val_c_app, is_iso.comp_inv_eq, Scheme.app_eq _ e,
Γ_Spec.adjunction_unit_app_app_top],
simp only [category.assoc, eq_to_hom_op],
erw ← functor.map_comp_assoc,
rw [eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl, category_theory.functor.map_id,
category.id_comp],
erw Spec_Γ_identity.inv_hom_id_app_assoc,
simp only [eq_to_hom_map, eq_to_hom_trans],
end
lemma is_affine_open.is_localization_stalk {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (x : U) :
is_localization.at_prime (X.presheaf.stalk x) (hU.prime_ideal_of x).as_ideal :=
begin
haveI : is_affine _ := hU,
haveI : nonempty U := ⟨x⟩,
rcases x with ⟨x, hx⟩,
let y := hU.prime_ideal_of ⟨x, hx⟩,
have : hU.from_Spec.val.base y = x := hU.from_Spec_prime_ideal_of ⟨x, hx⟩,
change is_localization y.as_ideal.prime_compl _,
clear_value y,
subst this,
apply (is_localization.is_localization_iff_of_ring_equiv _
(as_iso $ PresheafedSpace.stalk_map hU.from_Spec.1 y).CommRing_iso_to_ring_equiv).mpr,
convert structure_sheaf.is_localization.to_stalk _ _ using 1,
delta structure_sheaf.stalk_algebra,
congr' 1,
rw ring_hom.algebra_map_to_algebra,
refine (PresheafedSpace.stalk_map_germ hU.from_Spec.1 _ ⟨_, _⟩).trans _,
delta is_affine_open.from_Spec Scheme.iso_Spec structure_sheaf.to_stalk,
simp only [Scheme.comp_val_c_app, category.assoc],
dsimp only [functor.op, as_iso_inv, unop_op],
erw is_affine_open.is_localization_stalk_aux,
simp only [category.assoc],
conv_lhs { rw ← category.assoc },
erw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, Spec_Γ_naturality_assoc],
congr' 1,
simp only [← category.assoc],
transitivity _ ≫ (structure_sheaf (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)).presheaf.germ ⟨_, _⟩,
{ refl },
convert ((structure_sheaf (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)).presheaf.germ_res (hom_of_le le_top) ⟨_, _⟩)
using 2,
rw category.assoc,
erw nat_trans.naturality,
rw [← LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_map_op, ← LocallyRingedSpace.Γ.map_comp_assoc, ← op_comp],
erw ← Scheme.Spec.map_comp,
rw [← op_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp],
transitivity LocallyRingedSpace.Γ.map (quiver.hom.op $ Scheme.Spec.map
(X.presheaf.map (𝟙 (op U))).op) ≫ _,
{ congr },
simp only [category_theory.functor.map_id, op_id],
erw category_theory.functor.map_id,
rw category.id_comp,
refl
end
/-- The basic open set of a section `f` on an an affine open as an `X.affine_opens`. -/
@[simps]
def Scheme.affine_basic_open (X : Scheme) {U : X.affine_opens}
(f : X.presheaf.obj $ op U) : X.affine_opens :=
⟨X.basic_open f, U.prop.basic_open_is_affine f⟩
@[simp]
lemma is_affine_open.basic_open_from_Spec_app {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :
@Scheme.basic_open (Scheme.Spec.obj $ op (X.presheaf.obj $ op U))
((opens.map hU.from_Spec.1.base).obj U)
(hU.from_Spec.1.c.app (op U) f) = prime_spectrum.basic_open f :=
begin
rw [← Scheme.basic_open_res_eq _ _ (eq_to_hom hU.from_Spec_base_preimage.symm).op,
basic_open_eq_of_affine', is_affine_open.from_Spec_app_eq],
congr,
rw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, category.assoc, ← functor.map_comp_assoc,
eq_to_hom_op, eq_to_hom_op, eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl, category_theory.functor.map_id,
category.id_comp, ← iso.app_inv, iso.inv_hom_id],
refl
end
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_map_basic_open {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :
(opens.map hU.from_Spec.val.base).obj (X.basic_open f) = prime_spectrum.basic_open f :=
by simp
lemma is_affine_open.basic_open_union_eq_self_iff {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (s : set (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)) :
(⨆ (f : s), X.basic_open (f : X.presheaf.obj $ op U)) = U ↔ ideal.span s = ⊤ :=
begin
transitivity (⋃ (i : s), (prime_spectrum.basic_open i.1).1) = set.univ,
transitivity hU.from_Spec.1.base ⁻¹' (⨆ (f : s), X.basic_open (f : X.presheaf.obj $ op U)).1 =
hU.from_Spec.1.base ⁻¹' U.1,
{ refine ⟨λ h, by rw h, _⟩,
intro h,
apply_fun set.image hU.from_Spec.1.base at h,
rw [set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
hU.from_Spec_range] at h,
simp only [set.inter_self, subtype.val_eq_coe, set.inter_eq_right_iff_subset]
at h,
ext1,
refine le_antisymm _ h,
simp only [set.Union_subset_iff, set_coe.forall, opens.supr_def, set.le_eq_subset,
subtype.coe_mk],
intros x hx,
exact X.basic_open_le x },
{ simp only [opens.supr_def, subtype.coe_mk, set.preimage_Union, subtype.val_eq_coe],
congr' 3,
{ ext1 x,
exact congr_arg subtype.val (hU.from_Spec_map_basic_open _) },
{ exact congr_arg subtype.val hU.from_Spec_base_preimage } },
{ simp only [subtype.val_eq_coe, prime_spectrum.basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl],
rw [← set.compl_Inter, set.compl_univ_iff, ← prime_spectrum.zero_locus_Union,
← prime_spectrum.zero_locus_empty_iff_eq_top, prime_spectrum.zero_locus_span],
simp only [set.Union_singleton_eq_range, subtype.range_coe_subtype, set.set_of_mem_eq] }
end
lemma is_affine_open.self_le_basic_open_union_iff {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (s : set (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)) :
U ≤ (⨆ (f : s), X.basic_open (f : X.presheaf.obj $ op U)) ↔ ideal.span s = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← hU.basic_open_union_eq_self_iff, @comm _ eq],
refine ⟨λ h, le_antisymm h _, le_of_eq⟩,
simp only [supr_le_iff, set_coe.forall],
intros x hx,
exact X.basic_open_le x
end
/--
Let `P` be a predicate on the affine open sets of `X` satisfying
1. If `P` holds on `U`, then `P` holds on the basic open set of every section on `U`.
2. If `P` holds for a family of basic open sets covering `U`, then `P` holds for `U`.
3. There exists an affine open cover of `X` each satisfying `P`.
Then `P` holds for every affine open of `X`.
This is also known as the **Affine communication lemma** in [*The rising sea*][RisingSea]. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma of_affine_open_cover {X : Scheme} (V : X.affine_opens) (S : set X.affine_opens)
{P : X.affine_opens → Prop}
(hP₁ : ∀ (U : X.affine_opens) (f : X.presheaf.obj $ op U.1), P U →
P (X.affine_basic_open f))
(hP₂ : ∀ (U : X.affine_opens) (s : finset (X.presheaf.obj $ op U))
(hs : ideal.span (s : set (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)) = ⊤),
(∀ (f : s), P (X.affine_basic_open f.1)) → P U)
(hS : (⋃ (i : S), i : set X.carrier) = set.univ)
(hS' : ∀ (U : S), P U) : P V :=
begin
classical,
have : ∀ (x : V), ∃ (f : X.presheaf.obj $ op V.1),
↑x ∈ (X.basic_open f) ∧ P (X.affine_basic_open f),
{ intro x,
have : ↑x ∈ (set.univ : set X.carrier) := trivial,
rw ← hS at this,
obtain ⟨W, hW⟩ := set.mem_Union.mp this,
obtain ⟨f, g, e, hf⟩ := exists_basic_open_le_affine_inter V.prop W.1.prop x ⟨x.prop, hW⟩,
refine ⟨f, hf, _⟩,
convert hP₁ _ g (hS' W) using 1,
ext1,
exact e },
choose f hf₁ hf₂ using this,
suffices : ideal.span (set.range f) = ⊤,
{ obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := (ideal.span_eq_top_iff_finite _).mp this,
apply hP₂ V t ht₂,
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩,
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := ht₁ hi,
exact hf₂ x },
rw ← V.prop.self_le_basic_open_union_iff,
intros x hx,
simp only [exists_prop, set.mem_Union, set.mem_range, set_coe.exists, opens.supr_def,
exists_exists_eq_and, opens.mem_coe, subtype.coe_mk],
refine ⟨_, hf₁ ⟨x, hx⟩⟩,
end
end algebraic_geometry
|
32f8152219b5f771c9f92ea70e1cb0780685a6c9 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/order/closure.lean | 347ee87c9174e43553504033407265ca87d9ea09 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,321 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Yaël Dillies
-/
import data.set.lattice
import data.set_like.basic
import order.galois_connection
import order.hom.basic
/-!
# Closure operators between preorders
We define (bundled) closure operators on a preorder as monotone (increasing), extensive
(inflationary) and idempotent functions.
We define closed elements for the operator as elements which are fixed by it.
Lower adjoints to a function between preorders `u : β → α` allow to generalise closure operators to
situations where the closure operator we are dealing with naturally decomposes as `u ∘ l` where `l`
is a worthy function to have on its own. Typical examples include
`l : set G → subgroup G := subgroup.closure`, `u : subgroup G → set G := coe`, where `G` is a group.
This shows there is a close connection between closure operators, lower adjoints and Galois
connections/insertions: every Galois connection induces a lower adjoint which itself induces a
closure operator by composition (see `galois_connection.lower_adjoint` and
`lower_adjoint.closure_operator`), and every closure operator on a partial order induces a Galois
insertion from the set of closed elements to the underlying type (see `closure_operator.gi`).
## Main definitions
* `closure_operator`: A closure operator is a monotone function `f : α → α` such that
`∀ x, x ≤ f x` and `∀ x, f (f x) = f x`.
* `lower_adjoint`: A lower adjoint to `u : β → α` is a function `l : α → β` such that `l` and `u`
form a Galois connection.
## Implementation details
Although `lower_adjoint` is technically a generalisation of `closure_operator` (by defining
`to_fun := id`), it is desirable to have both as otherwise `id`s would be carried all over the
place when using concrete closure operators such as `convex_hull`.
`lower_adjoint` really is a semibundled `structure` version of `galois_connection`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closure_operator#Closure_operators_on_partially_ordered_sets
-/
universe u
/-! ### Closure operator -/
variables (α : Type*) {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-- A closure operator on the preorder `α` is a monotone function which is extensive (every `x`
is less than its closure) and idempotent. -/
structure closure_operator [preorder α] extends α →o α :=
(le_closure' : ∀ x, x ≤ to_fun x)
(idempotent' : ∀ x, to_fun (to_fun x) = to_fun x)
namespace closure_operator
instance [preorder α] : has_coe_to_fun (closure_operator α) (λ _, α → α) := ⟨λ c, c.to_fun⟩
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.apply [preorder α] (f : closure_operator α) : α → α := f
initialize_simps_projections closure_operator (to_order_hom_to_fun → apply, -to_order_hom)
section partial_order
variable [partial_order α]
/-- The identity function as a closure operator. -/
@[simps]
def id : closure_operator α :=
{ to_order_hom := order_hom.id,
le_closure' := λ _, le_rfl,
idempotent' := λ _, rfl }
instance : inhabited (closure_operator α) := ⟨id α⟩
variables {α} (c : closure_operator α)
@[ext] lemma ext :
∀ (c₁ c₂ : closure_operator α), (c₁ : α → α) = (c₂ : α → α) → c₁ = c₂
| ⟨⟨c₁, _⟩, _, _⟩ ⟨⟨c₂, _⟩, _, _⟩ h := by { congr, exact h }
/-- Constructor for a closure operator using the weaker idempotency axiom: `f (f x) ≤ f x`. -/
@[simps]
def mk' (f : α → α) (hf₁ : monotone f) (hf₂ : ∀ x, x ≤ f x) (hf₃ : ∀ x, f (f x) ≤ f x) :
closure_operator α :=
{ to_fun := f,
monotone' := hf₁,
le_closure' := hf₂,
idempotent' := λ x, (hf₃ x).antisymm (hf₁ (hf₂ x)) }
/-- Convenience constructor for a closure operator using the weaker minimality axiom:
`x ≤ f y → f x ≤ f y`, which is sometimes easier to prove in practice. -/
@[simps]
def mk₂ (f : α → α) (hf : ∀ x, x ≤ f x) (hmin : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ f y → f x ≤ f y) :
closure_operator α :=
{ to_fun := f,
monotone' := λ x y hxy, hmin (hxy.trans (hf y)),
le_closure' := hf,
idempotent' := λ x, (hmin le_rfl).antisymm (hf _) }
/-- Expanded out version of `mk₂`. `p` implies being closed. This constructor should be used when
you already know a sufficient condition for being closed and using `mem_mk₃_closed` will avoid you
the (slight) hassle of having to prove it both inside and outside the constructor. -/
@[simps]
def mk₃ (f : α → α) (p : α → Prop) (hf : ∀ x, x ≤ f x) (hfp : ∀ x, p (f x))
(hmin : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → p y → f x ≤ y) :
closure_operator α :=
mk₂ f hf (λ x y hxy, hmin hxy (hfp y))
/-- This lemma shows that the image of `x` of a closure operator built from the `mk₃` constructor
respects `p`, the property that was fed into it. -/
lemma closure_mem_mk₃ {f : α → α} {p : α → Prop} {hf : ∀ x, x ≤ f x} {hfp : ∀ x, p (f x)}
{hmin : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → p y → f x ≤ y} (x : α) :
p (mk₃ f p hf hfp hmin x) :=
hfp x
/-- Analogue of `closure_le_closed_iff_le` but with the `p` that was fed into the `mk₃` constructor.
-/
lemma closure_le_mk₃_iff {f : α → α} {p : α → Prop} {hf : ∀ x, x ≤ f x} {hfp : ∀ x, p (f x)}
{hmin : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → p y → f x ≤ y} {x y : α} (hxy : x ≤ y) (hy : p y) :
mk₃ f p hf hfp hmin x ≤ y :=
hmin hxy hy
@[mono] lemma monotone : monotone c := c.monotone'
/-- Every element is less than its closure. This property is sometimes referred to as extensivity or
inflationarity. -/
lemma le_closure (x : α) : x ≤ c x := c.le_closure' x
@[simp] lemma idempotent (x : α) : c (c x) = c x := c.idempotent' x
lemma le_closure_iff (x y : α) : x ≤ c y ↔ c x ≤ c y :=
⟨λ h, c.idempotent y ▸ c.monotone h, λ h, (c.le_closure x).trans h⟩
/-- An element `x` is closed for the closure operator `c` if it is a fixed point for it. -/
def closed : set α := λ x, c x = x
lemma mem_closed_iff (x : α) : x ∈ c.closed ↔ c x = x := iff.rfl
lemma mem_closed_iff_closure_le (x : α) : x ∈ c.closed ↔ c x ≤ x :=
⟨le_of_eq, λ h, h.antisymm (c.le_closure x)⟩
lemma closure_eq_self_of_mem_closed {x : α} (h : x ∈ c.closed) : c x = x := h
@[simp] lemma closure_is_closed (x : α) : c x ∈ c.closed := c.idempotent x
/-- The set of closed elements for `c` is exactly its range. -/
lemma closed_eq_range_close : c.closed = set.range c :=
set.ext $ λ x, ⟨λ h, ⟨x, h⟩, by { rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩, apply c.idempotent }⟩
/-- Send an `x` to an element of the set of closed elements (by taking the closure). -/
def to_closed (x : α) : c.closed := ⟨c x, c.closure_is_closed x⟩
@[simp] lemma closure_le_closed_iff_le (x : α) {y : α} (hy : c.closed y) : c x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
by rw [←c.closure_eq_self_of_mem_closed hy, ←le_closure_iff]
/-- A closure operator is equal to the closure operator obtained by feeding `c.closed` into the
`mk₃` constructor. -/
lemma eq_mk₃_closed (c : closure_operator α) :
c = mk₃ c c.closed c.le_closure c.closure_is_closed
(λ x y hxy hy, (c.closure_le_closed_iff_le x hy).2 hxy) :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- The property `p` fed into the `mk₃` constructor implies being closed. -/
lemma mem_mk₃_closed {f : α → α} {p : α → Prop} {hf : ∀ x, x ≤ f x} {hfp : ∀ x, p (f x)}
{hmin : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≤ y → p y → f x ≤ y} {x : α} (hx : p x) :
x ∈ (mk₃ f p hf hfp hmin).closed :=
(hmin le_rfl hx).antisymm (hf _)
end partial_order
variable {α}
section order_top
variables [partial_order α] [order_top α] (c : closure_operator α)
@[simp] lemma closure_top : c ⊤ = ⊤ :=
le_top.antisymm (c.le_closure _)
lemma top_mem_closed : ⊤ ∈ c.closed :=
c.closure_top
end order_top
lemma closure_inf_le [semilattice_inf α] (c : closure_operator α) (x y : α) :
c (x ⊓ y) ≤ c x ⊓ c y :=
c.monotone.map_inf_le _ _
section semilattice_sup
variables [semilattice_sup α] (c : closure_operator α)
lemma closure_sup_closure_le (x y : α) :
c x ⊔ c y ≤ c (x ⊔ y) :=
c.monotone.le_map_sup _ _
lemma closure_sup_closure_left (x y : α) :
c (c x ⊔ y) = c (x ⊔ y) :=
((c.le_closure_iff _ _).1 (sup_le (c.monotone le_sup_left) (le_sup_right.trans
(c.le_closure _)))).antisymm (c.monotone (sup_le_sup_right (c.le_closure _) _))
lemma closure_sup_closure_right (x y : α) :
c (x ⊔ c y) = c (x ⊔ y) :=
by rw [sup_comm, closure_sup_closure_left, sup_comm]
lemma closure_sup_closure (x y : α) :
c (c x ⊔ c y) = c (x ⊔ y) :=
by rw [closure_sup_closure_left, closure_sup_closure_right]
end semilattice_sup
section complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice α] (c : closure_operator α)
@[simp] lemma closure_supr_closure (f : ι → α) : c (⨆ i, c (f i)) = c (⨆ i, f i) :=
le_antisymm ((c.le_closure_iff _ _).1 $ supr_le $ λ i, c.monotone $ le_supr f i) $
c.monotone $ supr_mono $ λ i, c.le_closure _
@[simp] lemma closure_supr₂_closure (f : Π i, κ i → α) : c (⨆ i j, c (f i j)) = c (⨆ i j, f i j) :=
le_antisymm ((c.le_closure_iff _ _).1 $ supr₂_le $ λ i j, c.monotone $ le_supr₂ i j) $
c.monotone $ supr₂_mono $ λ i j, c.le_closure _
end complete_lattice
end closure_operator
/-! ### Lower adjoint -/
variables {α} {β : Type*}
/-- A lower adjoint of `u` on the preorder `α` is a function `l` such that `l` and `u` form a Galois
connection. It allows us to define closure operators whose output does not match the input. In
practice, `u` is often `coe : β → α`. -/
structure lower_adjoint [preorder α] [preorder β] (u : β → α) :=
(to_fun : α → β)
(gc' : galois_connection to_fun u)
namespace lower_adjoint
variable (α)
/-- The identity function as a lower adjoint to itself. -/
@[simps]
protected def id [preorder α] : lower_adjoint (id : α → α) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, x,
gc' := galois_connection.id }
variable {α}
instance [preorder α] : inhabited (lower_adjoint (id : α → α)) := ⟨lower_adjoint.id α⟩
section preorder
variables [preorder α] [preorder β] {u : β → α} (l : lower_adjoint u)
instance : has_coe_to_fun (lower_adjoint u) (λ _, α → β) := { coe := to_fun }
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.apply : α → β := l
lemma gc : galois_connection l u := l.gc'
@[ext] lemma ext :
∀ (l₁ l₂ : lower_adjoint u), (l₁ : α → β) = (l₂ : α → β) → l₁ = l₂
| ⟨l₁, _⟩ ⟨l₂, _⟩ h := by { congr, exact h }
@[mono] lemma monotone : monotone (u ∘ l) := l.gc.monotone_u.comp l.gc.monotone_l
/-- Every element is less than its closure. This property is sometimes referred to as extensivity or
inflationarity. -/
lemma le_closure (x : α) : x ≤ u (l x) := l.gc.le_u_l _
end preorder
section partial_order
variables [partial_order α] [preorder β] {u : β → α} (l : lower_adjoint u)
/-- Every lower adjoint induces a closure operator given by the composition. This is the partial
order version of the statement that every adjunction induces a monad. -/
@[simps]
def closure_operator :
closure_operator α :=
{ to_fun := λ x, u (l x),
monotone' := l.monotone,
le_closure' := l.le_closure,
idempotent' := λ x, l.gc.u_l_u_eq_u (l x) }
lemma idempotent (x : α) : u (l (u (l x))) = u (l x) :=
l.closure_operator.idempotent _
lemma le_closure_iff (x y : α) : x ≤ u (l y) ↔ u (l x) ≤ u (l y) :=
l.closure_operator.le_closure_iff _ _
end partial_order
section preorder
variables [preorder α] [preorder β] {u : β → α} (l : lower_adjoint u)
/-- An element `x` is closed for `l : lower_adjoint u` if it is a fixed point: `u (l x) = x` -/
def closed : set α := λ x, u (l x) = x
lemma mem_closed_iff (x : α) : x ∈ l.closed ↔ u (l x) = x := iff.rfl
lemma closure_eq_self_of_mem_closed {x : α} (h : x ∈ l.closed) : u (l x) = x := h
end preorder
section partial_order
variables [partial_order α] [partial_order β] {u : β → α} (l : lower_adjoint u)
lemma mem_closed_iff_closure_le (x : α) : x ∈ l.closed ↔ u (l x) ≤ x :=
l.closure_operator.mem_closed_iff_closure_le _
@[simp] lemma closure_is_closed (x : α) : u (l x) ∈ l.closed := l.idempotent x
/-- The set of closed elements for `l` is the range of `u ∘ l`. -/
lemma closed_eq_range_close : l.closed = set.range (u ∘ l) :=
l.closure_operator.closed_eq_range_close
/-- Send an `x` to an element of the set of closed elements (by taking the closure). -/
def to_closed (x : α) : l.closed := ⟨u (l x), l.closure_is_closed x⟩
@[simp] lemma closure_le_closed_iff_le (x : α) {y : α} (hy : l.closed y) : u (l x) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
l.closure_operator.closure_le_closed_iff_le x hy
end partial_order
lemma closure_top [partial_order α] [order_top α] [preorder β] {u : β → α} (l : lower_adjoint u) :
u (l ⊤) = ⊤ :=
l.closure_operator.closure_top
lemma closure_inf_le [semilattice_inf α] [preorder β] {u : β → α} (l : lower_adjoint u) (x y : α) :
u (l (x ⊓ y)) ≤ u (l x) ⊓ u (l y) :=
l.closure_operator.closure_inf_le x y
section semilattice_sup
variables [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] {u : β → α} (l : lower_adjoint u)
lemma closure_sup_closure_le (x y : α) :
u (l x) ⊔ u (l y) ≤ u (l (x ⊔ y)) :=
l.closure_operator.closure_sup_closure_le x y
lemma closure_sup_closure_left (x y : α) :
u (l (u (l x) ⊔ y)) = u (l (x ⊔ y)) :=
l.closure_operator.closure_sup_closure_left x y
lemma closure_sup_closure_right (x y : α) :
u (l (x ⊔ u (l y))) = u (l (x ⊔ y)) :=
l.closure_operator.closure_sup_closure_right x y
lemma closure_sup_closure (x y : α) :
u (l (u (l x) ⊔ u (l y))) = u (l (x ⊔ y)) :=
l.closure_operator.closure_sup_closure x y
end semilattice_sup
section complete_lattice
variables [complete_lattice α] [preorder β] {u : β → α} (l : lower_adjoint u)
lemma closure_supr_closure (f : ι → α) : u (l (⨆ i, u (l (f i)))) = u (l (⨆ i, f i)) :=
l.closure_operator.closure_supr_closure _
lemma closure_supr₂_closure (f : Π i, κ i → α) :
u (l $ ⨆ i j, u (l $ f i j)) = u (l $ ⨆ i j, f i j) :=
l.closure_operator.closure_supr₂_closure _
end complete_lattice
/- Lemmas for `lower_adjoint (coe : α → set β)`, where `set_like α β` -/
section coe_to_set
variables [set_like α β] (l : lower_adjoint (coe : α → set β))
lemma subset_closure (s : set β) : s ⊆ l s :=
l.le_closure s
lemma not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {s : set β} {P : β} (hP : P ∉ l s) : P ∉ s :=
λ h, hP (subset_closure _ s h)
lemma le_iff_subset (s : set β) (S : α) : l s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
l.gc s S
lemma mem_iff (s : set β) (x : β) : x ∈ l s ↔ ∀ S : α, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
by { simp_rw [←set_like.mem_coe, ←set.singleton_subset_iff, ←l.le_iff_subset],
exact ⟨λ h S, h.trans, λ h, h _ le_rfl⟩ }
lemma eq_of_le {s : set β} {S : α} (h₁ : s ⊆ S) (h₂ : S ≤ l s) : l s = S :=
((l.le_iff_subset _ _).2 h₁).antisymm h₂
lemma closure_union_closure_subset (x y : α) :
(l x : set β) ∪ (l y) ⊆ l (x ∪ y) :=
l.closure_sup_closure_le x y
@[simp] lemma closure_union_closure_left (x y : α) :
(l ((l x) ∪ y) : set β) = l (x ∪ y) :=
l.closure_sup_closure_left x y
@[simp] lemma closure_union_closure_right (x y : α) :
l (x ∪ (l y)) = l (x ∪ y) :=
set_like.coe_injective (l.closure_sup_closure_right x y)
@[simp] lemma closure_union_closure (x y : α) :
l ((l x) ∪ (l y)) = l (x ∪ y) :=
set_like.coe_injective (l.closure_operator.closure_sup_closure x y)
@[simp] lemma closure_Union_closure (f : ι → α) : l (⋃ i, l (f i)) = l (⋃ i, f i) :=
set_like.coe_injective $ l.closure_supr_closure _
@[simp] lemma closure_Union₂_closure (f : Π i, κ i → α) : l (⋃ i j, l (f i j)) = l (⋃ i j, f i j) :=
set_like.coe_injective $ l.closure_supr₂_closure _
end coe_to_set
end lower_adjoint
/-! ### Translations between `galois_connection`, `lower_adjoint`, `closure_operator` -/
variable {α}
/-- Every Galois connection induces a lower adjoint. -/
@[simps]
def galois_connection.lower_adjoint [preorder α] [preorder β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gc : galois_connection l u) :
lower_adjoint u :=
{ to_fun := l,
gc' := gc }
/-- Every Galois connection induces a closure operator given by the composition. This is the partial
order version of the statement that every adjunction induces a monad. -/
@[simps]
def galois_connection.closure_operator [partial_order α] [preorder β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gc : galois_connection l u) :
closure_operator α :=
gc.lower_adjoint.closure_operator
/-- The set of closed elements has a Galois insertion to the underlying type. -/
def closure_operator.gi [partial_order α] (c : closure_operator α) :
galois_insertion c.to_closed coe :=
{ choice := λ x hx, ⟨x, hx.antisymm (c.le_closure x)⟩,
gc := λ x y, (c.closure_le_closed_iff_le _ y.2),
le_l_u := λ x, c.le_closure _,
choice_eq := λ x hx, le_antisymm (c.le_closure x) hx }
/-- The Galois insertion associated to a closure operator can be used to reconstruct the closure
operator.
Note that the inverse in the opposite direction does not hold in general. -/
@[simp]
lemma closure_operator_gi_self [partial_order α] (c : closure_operator α) :
c.gi.gc.closure_operator = c :=
by { ext x, refl }
|
dbc24652515de1ee1bc1123a18a0529f7ba0538d | c09f5945267fd905e23a77be83d9a78580e04a4a | /src/topology/metric_space/basic.lean | c87db7b93e493119dfe6b17ac4476d3eb92d4370 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | OHIHIYA20/mathlib | 023a6df35355b5b6eb931c404f7dd7535dccfa89 | 1ec0a1f49db97d45e8666a3bf33217ff79ca1d87 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,964,529,965 | 1,551,819,319,000 | 1,551,819,319,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 56,187 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Metric spaces.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
Many definitions and theorems expected on metric spaces are already introduced on uniform spaces and
topological spaces. For example:
open and closed sets, compactness, completeness, continuity and uniform continuity
-/
import data.real.nnreal topology.metric_space.emetric_space topology.algebra.ordered
open lattice set filter classical topological_space
noncomputable theory
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def uniform_space_of_dist
(dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : uniform_space α :=
uniform_space.of_core {
uniformity := (⨅ ε>0, principal {p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε}),
refl := le_infi $ assume ε, le_infi $
by simp [set.subset_def, id_rel, dist_self, (>)] {contextual := tt},
comp := le_infi $ assume ε, le_infi $ assume h, lift'_le
(mem_infi_sets (ε / 2) $ mem_infi_sets (div_pos_of_pos_of_pos h two_pos) (subset.refl _)) $
have ∀ (a b c : α), dist a c < ε / 2 → dist c b < ε / 2 → dist a b < ε,
from assume a b c hac hcb,
calc dist a b ≤ dist a c + dist c b : dist_triangle _ _ _
... < ε / 2 + ε / 2 : add_lt_add hac hcb
... = ε : by rw [div_add_div_same, add_self_div_two],
by simpa [comp_rel],
symm := tendsto_infi.2 $ assume ε, tendsto_infi.2 $ assume h,
tendsto_infi' ε $ tendsto_infi' h $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ by simp [dist_comm] }
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
class has_dist (α : Type*) := (dist : α → α → ℝ)
export has_dist (dist)
/-- Metric space
Each metric space induces a canonical `uniform_space` and hence a canonical `topological_space`.
This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `uniform_space` structure. When
instantiating a `metric_space` structure, the uniformity fields are not necessary, they will be
filled in by default. In the same way, each metric space induces an emetric space structure.
It is included in the structure, but filled in by default.
When one instantiates a metric space structure, for instance a product structure,
this makes it possible to use a uniform structure and an edistance that are exactly
the ones for the uniform spaces product and the emetric spaces products, thereby
ensuring that everything in defeq in diamonds.-/
class metric_space (α : Type u) extends has_dist α : Type u :=
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(eq_of_dist_eq_zero : ∀ {x y : α}, dist x y = 0 → x = y)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(edist : α → α → ennreal := λx y, ennreal.of_real (dist x y))
(edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ennreal.of_real (dist x y) . control_laws_tac)
(to_uniform_space : uniform_space α := uniform_space_of_dist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle)
(uniformity_dist : uniformity = ⨅ ε>0, principal {p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε} . control_laws_tac)
variables [metric_space α]
instance metric_space.to_uniform_space' : uniform_space α :=
metric_space.to_uniform_space α
instance metric_space.to_has_edist : has_edist α := ⟨metric_space.edist⟩
@[simp] theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 := metric_space.dist_self x
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero {x y : α} : dist x y = 0 → x = y :=
metric_space.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x := metric_space.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ennreal.of_real (dist x y) :=
metric_space.edist_dist _ x y
@[simp] theorem dist_eq_zero {x y : α} : dist x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
iff.intro eq_of_dist_eq_zero (assume : x = y, this ▸ dist_self _)
@[simp] theorem zero_eq_dist {x y : α} : 0 = dist x y ↔ x = y :=
by rw [eq_comm, dist_eq_zero]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
metric_space.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y :=
by rw dist_comm z; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z :=
by rw dist_comm y; apply dist_triangle
lemma dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) :
dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w : dist_triangle x z w
... ≤ (dist x y + dist y z) + dist z w : add_le_add_right (metric_space.dist_triangle x y z) _
lemma dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) :=
by rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]; apply dist_triangle4
lemma dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ :=
by rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]; apply dist_triangle4
theorem swap_dist : function.swap (@dist α _) = dist :=
by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : abs (dist x z - dist y z) ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _),
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have 2 * dist x y ≥ 0,
from calc 2 * dist x y = dist x y + dist y x : by rw [dist_comm x y, two_mul]
... ≥ 0 : by rw ← dist_self x; apply dist_triangle,
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left this two_pos
@[simp] theorem dist_le_zero {x y : α} : dist x y ≤ 0 ↔ x = y :=
by simpa [le_antisymm_iff, dist_nonneg] using @dist_eq_zero _ _ x y
@[simp] theorem dist_pos {x y : α} : 0 < dist x y ↔ x ≠ y :=
by simpa [-dist_le_zero] using not_congr (@dist_le_zero _ _ x y)
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : abs (dist a b) = dist a b :=
abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
theorem eq_of_forall_dist_le {x y : α} (h : ∀ε, ε > 0 → dist x y ≤ ε) : x = y :=
eq_of_dist_eq_zero (eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense dist_nonneg h)
def nndist (a b : α) : nnreal := ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩
/--Express `nndist` in terms of `edist`-/
lemma nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).to_nnreal :=
by simp [nndist, edist_dist, nnreal.of_real, max_eq_left dist_nonneg, ennreal.of_real]
/--Express `edist` in terms of `nndist`-/
lemma edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = ↑(nndist x y) :=
by simp [nndist, edist_dist, nnreal.of_real, max_eq_left dist_nonneg, ennreal.of_real]
/--In a metric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
lemma edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
by rw [edist_dist x y]; apply ennreal.coe_ne_top
/--`nndist x x` vanishes-/
@[simp] lemma nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := (nnreal.coe_eq_zero _).1 (dist_self a)
/--Express `dist` in terms of `nndist`-/
lemma dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = ↑(nndist x y) := rfl
/--Express `nndist` in terms of `dist`-/
lemma nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = nnreal.of_real (dist x y) :=
by rw [dist_nndist, nnreal.of_real_coe]
/--Deduce the equality of points with the vanishing of the nonnegative distance-/
theorem eq_of_nndist_eq_zero {x y : α} : nndist x y = 0 → x = y :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, (dist_nndist _ _).symm, imp_self, nnreal.coe_zero, dist_eq_zero]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x :=
by simpa [nnreal.eq_iff.symm] using dist_comm x y
/--Characterize the equality of points with the vanishing of the nonnegative distance-/
@[simp] theorem nndist_eq_zero {x y : α} : nndist x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, (dist_nndist _ _).symm, imp_self, nnreal.coe_zero, dist_eq_zero]
@[simp] theorem zero_eq_nndist {x y : α} : 0 = nndist x y ↔ x = y :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, (dist_nndist _ _).symm, imp_self, nnreal.coe_zero, zero_eq_dist]
/--Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance-/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
by simpa [nnreal.coe_le] using dist_triangle x y z
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
by simpa [nnreal.coe_le] using dist_triangle_left x y z
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
by simpa [nnreal.coe_le] using dist_triangle_right x y z
/--Express `dist` in terms of `edist`-/
lemma dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).to_real :=
by rw [edist_dist, ennreal.to_real_of_real (dist_nonneg)]
namespace metric
/- instantiate metric space as a topology -/
variables {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : set α := {y | dist y x < ε}
@[simp] theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε := iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw dist_comm; refl
/-- `closed_ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closed_ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := {y | dist y x ≤ ε}
@[simp] theorem mem_closed_ball : y ∈ closed_ball x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := iff.rfl
theorem ball_subset_closed_ball : ball x ε ⊆ closed_ball x ε :=
assume y, by simp; intros h; apply le_of_lt h
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : ε > 0 :=
lt_of_le_of_lt dist_nonneg hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : ε > 0) : x ∈ ball x ε :=
show dist x x < ε, by rw dist_self; assumption
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε :=
by simp [dist_comm]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
λ y (yx : _ < ε₁), lt_of_lt_of_le yx h
theorem closed_ball_subset_closed_ball {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {x : α} (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) :
closed_ball x ε₁ ⊆ closed_ball x ε₂ :=
λ y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁), le_trans yx h
theorem ball_disjoint (h : ε₁ + ε₂ ≤ dist x y) : ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂ = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ λ z ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
not_lt_of_le (dist_triangle_left x y z)
(lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add h₁ h₂) h)
theorem ball_disjoint_same (h : ε ≤ dist x y / 2) : ball x ε ∩ ball y ε = ∅ :=
ball_disjoint $ by rwa [← two_mul, ← le_div_iff' two_pos]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ :=
λ z zx, by rw ← add_sub_cancel'_right ε₁ ε₂; exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset $ by rw sub_self_div_two; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset $ by rw sub_sub_self⟩
theorem ball_eq_empty_iff_nonpos : ε ≤ 0 ↔ ball x ε = ∅ :=
(eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨λ h, le_of_not_gt $ λ ε0, h _ $ mem_ball_self ε0,
λ ε0 y h, not_lt_of_le ε0 $ pos_of_mem_ball h⟩).symm
theorem uniformity_dist : uniformity = (⨅ ε>0, principal {p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε}) :=
metric_space.uniformity_dist _
theorem uniformity_dist' : uniformity = (⨅ε:{ε:ℝ // ε>0}, principal {p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε.val}) :=
by simp [infi_subtype]; exact uniformity_dist
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : set (α×α)} :
s ∈ (@uniformity α _).sets ↔ (∃ε>0, ∀{a b:α}, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s) :=
begin
rw [uniformity_dist', infi_sets_eq],
simp [subset_def],
exact assume ⟨r, hr⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩, ⟨⟨min r p, lt_min hr hp⟩, by simp [lt_min_iff, (≥)] {contextual := tt}⟩,
exact ⟨⟨1, zero_lt_one⟩⟩
end
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε:ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
{p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε} ∈ (@uniformity α _).sets :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, λ a b, id⟩
theorem uniform_continuous_iff [metric_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0,
∀{a b:α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniform_continuous_def.trans
⟨λ H ε ε0, mem_uniformity_dist.1 $ H _ $ dist_mem_uniformity ε0,
λ H r ru,
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 ru, ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ := H _ ε0 in
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨δ, δ0, λ a b h, hε (hδ h)⟩⟩
theorem uniform_embedding_iff [metric_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_embedding f ↔ function.injective f ∧ uniform_continuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ :=
uniform_embedding_def'.trans $ and_congr iff.rfl $ and_congr iff.rfl
⟨λ H δ δ0, let ⟨t, tu, ht⟩ := H _ (dist_mem_uniformity δ0),
⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 tu in
⟨ε, ε0, λ a b h, ht _ _ (hε h)⟩,
λ H s su, let ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 su, ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := H _ δ0 in
⟨_, dist_mem_uniformity ε0, λ a b h, hδ (hε h)⟩⟩
theorem totally_bounded_iff {s : set α} :
totally_bounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃t : set α, finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃y∈t, ball y ε :=
⟨λ H ε ε0, H _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε0),
λ H r ru, let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 ru,
⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0 in
⟨t, ft, subset.trans h $ Union_subset_Union $ λ y, Union_subset_Union $ λ yt z, hε⟩⟩
/-- A metric space space is totally bounded if one can reconstruct up to any ε>0 any element of the
space from finitely many data. -/
lemma totally_bounded_of_finite_discretization {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {s : set α}
(H : ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ (β : Type u) [fintype β] (F : s → β),
∀x y, F x = F y → dist (x:α) y < ε) :
totally_bounded s :=
begin
classical, by_cases hs : s = ∅,
{ rw hs, exact totally_bounded_empty },
rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty hs with ⟨x0, hx0⟩,
haveI : inhabited s := ⟨⟨x0, hx0⟩⟩,
refine totally_bounded_iff.2 (λ ε ε0, _),
rcases H ε ε0 with ⟨β, fβ, F, hF⟩,
let Finv := function.inv_fun F,
refine ⟨range (subtype.val ∘ Finv), finite_range _, λ x xs, _⟩,
let x' := Finv (F ⟨x, xs⟩),
have : F x' = F ⟨x, xs⟩ := function.inv_fun_eq ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩,
simp only [set.mem_Union, set.mem_range],
exact ⟨_, ⟨F ⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩, hF _ _ this.symm⟩
end
protected lemma cauchy_iff {f : filter α} :
cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f.sets, ∀ x y ∈ t, dist x y < ε :=
cauchy_iff.trans $ and_congr iff.rfl
⟨λ H ε ε0, let ⟨t, tf, ts⟩ := H _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε0) in
⟨t, tf, λ x y xt yt, @ts (x, y) ⟨xt, yt⟩⟩,
λ H r ru, let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 ru,
⟨t, tf, h⟩ := H ε ε0 in
⟨t, tf, λ ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩, hε (h x y hx hy)⟩⟩
theorem nhds_eq : nhds x = (⨅ε:{ε:ℝ // ε>0}, principal (ball x ε.val)) :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity, uniformity_dist', lift'_infi],
{ apply congr_arg, funext ε,
rw [lift'_principal],
{ simp [ball, dist_comm] },
{ exact monotone_preimage } },
{ exact ⟨⟨1, zero_lt_one⟩⟩ },
{ intros, refl }
end
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ (nhds x).sets ↔ ∃ε>0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq, infi_sets_eq],
{ simp },
{ intros y z, cases y with y hy, cases z with z hz,
refine ⟨⟨min y z, lt_min hy hz⟩, _⟩,
simp [ball_subset_ball, min_le_left, min_le_right, (≥)] },
{ exact ⟨⟨1, zero_lt_one⟩⟩ }
end
theorem is_open_iff : is_open s ↔ ∀x∈s, ∃ε>0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
by simp [is_open_iff_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
theorem is_open_ball : is_open (ball x ε) :=
is_open_iff.2 $ λ y, exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ (nhds x).sets :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open_ball (mem_ball_self ε0)
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [metric_space β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
tendsto f (nhds a) (nhds b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀{x:α}, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
⟨λ H ε ε0, mem_nhds_iff.1 (H (ball_mem_nhds _ ε0)),
λ H s hs,
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 hs, ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ := H _ ε0 in
mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨δ, δ0, λ x h, hε (hδ h)⟩⟩
theorem continuous_iff [metric_space β] {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔
∀b (ε > 0), ∃ δ > 0, ∀a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.trans $ forall_congr $ λ b, tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem exists_delta_of_continuous [metric_space β] {f : α → β} {ε : ℝ}
(hf : continuous f) (hε : ε > 0) (b : α) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀a, dist a b ≤ δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
let ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδ⟩ := continuous_iff.1 hf b ε hε in
⟨δ / 2, half_pos δ_pos, assume a ha, hδ a $ lt_of_le_of_lt ha $ div_two_lt_of_pos δ_pos⟩
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
tendsto u f (nhds a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ n ∈ f.sets, ∀x ∈ n, dist (u x) a < ε :=
by simp only [metric.nhds_eq, tendsto_infi, subtype.forall, tendsto_principal, mem_ball];
exact forall_congr (assume ε, forall_congr (assume hε, exists_sets_subset_iff.symm))
theorem continuous_iff' [topological_space β] {f : β → α} :
continuous f ↔ ∀a (ε > 0), ∃ n ∈ (nhds a).sets, ∀b ∈ n, dist (f b) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.trans $ forall_congr $ λ b, tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_at_top [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
tendsto u at_top (nhds a) ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀n≥N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
by simp only [metric.nhds_eq, tendsto_infi, subtype.forall, tendsto_at_top_principal]; refl
end metric
open metric
instance metric_space.to_separated : separated α :=
separated_def.2 $ λ x y h, eq_of_forall_dist_le $
λ ε ε0, le_of_lt (h _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε0))
/-Instantiate a metric space as an emetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
/-- Expressing the uniformity in terms of `edist` -/
protected lemma metric.mem_uniformity_edist {s : set (α×α)} :
s ∈ (@uniformity α _).sets ↔ (∃ε>0, ∀{a b:α}, edist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s) :=
begin
refine mem_uniformity_dist.trans ⟨_, _⟩; rintro ⟨ε, ε0, Hε⟩,
{ refine ⟨ennreal.of_real ε, _, λ a b, _⟩,
{ rwa [gt, ennreal.of_real_pos] },
{ rw [edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff ε0],
exact Hε } },
{ rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn.1 ε0 with ⟨ε', _, ε0', hε⟩,
rw [ennreal.of_real_pos] at ε0',
refine ⟨ε', ε0', λ a b h, Hε (lt_trans _ hε)⟩,
rwa [edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff ε0'] }
end
protected theorem metric.uniformity_edist' : uniformity = (⨅ε:{ε:ennreal // ε>0}, principal {p:α×α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε.val}) :=
begin
ext s, rw infi_sets_eq,
{ simp [metric.mem_uniformity_edist, subset_def] },
{ rintro ⟨r, hr⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩, use ⟨min r p, lt_min hr hp⟩,
simp [lt_min_iff, (≥)] {contextual := tt} },
{ exact ⟨⟨1, ennreal.zero_lt_one⟩⟩ }
end
theorem uniformity_edist : uniformity = (⨅ ε>0, principal {p:α×α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε}) :=
by simpa [infi_subtype] using @metric.uniformity_edist' α _
/-- A metric space induces an emetric space -/
instance metric_space.to_emetric_space : emetric_space α :=
{ edist := edist,
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist],
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := assume x y h, by simpa [edist_dist] using h,
edist_comm := by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]; simp,
edist_triangle := assume x y z, begin
simp only [edist_dist, (ennreal.of_real_add _ _).symm, dist_nonneg],
rw ennreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff _,
{ exact dist_triangle _ _ _ },
{ simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg }
end,
uniformity_edist := uniformity_edist,
..‹metric_space α› }
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
lemma metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : emetric.ball x (ennreal.of_real ε) = ball x ε :=
begin
classical, by_cases h : 0 < ε,
{ ext y, by simp [edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff h] },
{ have h' : ε ≤ 0, by simpa using h,
have A : ball x ε = ∅, by simpa [ball_eq_empty_iff_nonpos.symm],
have B : emetric.ball x (ennreal.of_real ε) = ∅,
by simp [ennreal.of_real_eq_zero.2 h', emetric.ball_eq_empty_iff],
rwa [A, B] }
end
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
lemma metric.emetric_closed_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
emetric.closed_ball x (ennreal.of_real ε) = closed_ball x ε :=
by ext y; simp [edist_dist]; rw ennreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff h
def metric_space.replace_uniformity {α} [U : uniform_space α] (m : metric_space α)
(H : @uniformity _ U = @uniformity _ (metric_space.to_uniform_space α)) :
metric_space α :=
{ dist := @dist _ m.to_has_dist,
dist_self := dist_self,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := @eq_of_dist_eq_zero _ _,
dist_comm := dist_comm,
dist_triangle := dist_triangle,
edist := edist,
edist_dist := edist_dist,
to_uniform_space := U,
uniformity_dist := H.trans (metric_space.uniformity_dist α) }
/-- One gets a metric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite. We set it up so that the edist and the uniformity are
defeq in the metric space and the emetric space -/
def emetric_space.to_metric_space {α : Type u} [e : emetric_space α] (h : ∀x y: α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) :
metric_space α :=
let m : metric_space α :=
{ dist := λx y, ennreal.to_real (edist x y),
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λx y hxy, by simpa [dist, ennreal.to_real_eq_zero_iff, h x y] using hxy,
dist_self := λx, by simp,
dist_comm := λx y, by simp [emetric_space.edist_comm],
dist_triangle := λx y z, begin
rw [← ennreal.to_real_add (h _ _) (h _ _), ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (h _ _)],
{ exact edist_triangle _ _ _ },
{ simp [ennreal.add_eq_top, h] }
end,
edist := λx y, edist x y,
edist_dist := λx y, by simp [ennreal.of_real_to_real, h] } in
metric_space.replace_uniformity m (by rw [uniformity_edist, uniformity_edist']; refl)
section real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a metric space. -/
instance real.metric_space : metric_space ℝ :=
{ dist := λx y, abs (x - y),
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero],
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := by simp [add_neg_eq_zero],
dist_comm := assume x y, abs_sub _ _,
dist_triangle := assume x y z, abs_sub_le _ _ _ }
theorem real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = abs (x - y) := rfl
theorem real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = abs x :=
by simp [real.dist_eq]
instance : orderable_topology ℝ :=
orderable_topology_of_nhds_abs $ λ x, begin
simp only [show ∀ r, {b : ℝ | abs (x - b) < r} = ball x r,
by simp [-sub_eq_add_neg, abs_sub, ball, real.dist_eq]],
apply le_antisymm,
{ simp [le_infi_iff],
exact λ ε ε0, mem_nhds_sets (is_open_ball) (mem_ball_self ε0) },
{ intros s h,
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 h with ⟨ε, ε0, ss⟩,
exact mem_infi_sets _ (mem_infi_sets ε0 (mem_principal_sets.2 ss)) },
end
lemma closed_ball_Icc {x r : ℝ} : closed_ball x r = Icc (x-r) (x+r) :=
by ext y; rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_comm, real.dist_eq,
abs_sub_le_iff, mem_Icc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add', sub_le]
lemma squeeze_zero {α} {f g : α → ℝ} {t₀ : filter α} (hf : ∀t, 0 ≤ f t) (hft : ∀t, f t ≤ g t)
(g0 : tendsto g t₀ (nhds 0)) : tendsto f t₀ (nhds 0) :=
begin
apply tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le (tendsto_const_nhds) g0;
simp [*]; exact filter.univ_mem_sets
end
theorem metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero :
uniformity = comap (λp:α×α, dist p.1 p.2) (nhds (0 : ℝ)) :=
begin
simp only [uniformity_dist', nhds_eq, comap_infi, comap_principal],
congr, funext ε,
rw [principal_eq_iff_eq],
ext ⟨a, b⟩,
simp [real.dist_0_eq_abs]
end
lemma cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto_dist_at_top_0 [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ tendsto (λ (n : β × β), dist (u n.1) (u n.2)) at_top (nhds 0) :=
by rw [cauchy_seq_iff_prod_map, metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, ← map_le_iff_le_comap,
filter.map_map, tendsto, prod.map_def]
end real
section cauchy_seq
variables [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β]
/-- In a metric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the distance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem metric.cauchy_seq_iff {u : β → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀m n≥N, dist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
begin
unfold cauchy_seq,
rw metric.cauchy_iff,
simp only [true_and, exists_prop, filter.mem_at_top_sets, filter.at_top_ne_bot,
filter.mem_map, ne.def, filter.map_eq_bot_iff, not_false_iff, set.mem_set_of_eq],
split,
{ intros H ε εpos,
rcases H ε εpos with ⟨t, ⟨N, hN⟩, ht⟩,
exact ⟨N, λm n hm hn, ht _ _ (hN _ hm) (hN _ hn)⟩ },
{ intros H ε εpos,
rcases H (ε/2) (half_pos εpos) with ⟨N, hN⟩,
existsi ball (u N) (ε/2),
split,
{ exact ⟨N, λx hx, hN _ _ hx (le_refl N)⟩ },
{ exact λx y hx hy, calc
dist x y ≤ dist x (u N) + dist y (u N) : dist_triangle_right _ _ _
... < ε/2 + ε/2 : add_lt_add hx hy
... = ε : add_halves _ } }
end
/-- A variation around the metric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem metric.cauchy_seq_iff' {u : β → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀n≥N, dist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
begin
rw metric.cauchy_seq_iff,
split,
{ intros H ε εpos,
rcases H ε εpos with ⟨N, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, λn hn, hN _ _ hn (le_refl N)⟩ },
{ intros H ε εpos,
rcases H (ε/2) (half_pos εpos) with ⟨N, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, λ m n hm hn, calc
dist (u m) (u n) ≤ dist (u m) (u N) + dist (u n) (u N) : dist_triangle_right _ _ _
... < ε/2 + ε/2 : add_lt_add (hN _ hm) (hN _ hn)
... = ε : add_halves _⟩ }
end
/-- A Cauchy sequence on the natural numbers is bounded. -/
theorem cauchy_seq_bdd {u : ℕ → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u) :
∃ R > 0, ∀ m n, dist (u m) (u n) < R :=
begin
rcases metric.cauchy_seq_iff'.1 hu 1 zero_lt_one with ⟨N, hN⟩,
suffices : ∃ R > 0, ∀ n, dist (u n) (u N) < R,
{ rcases this with ⟨R, R0, H⟩,
exact ⟨_, add_pos R0 R0, λ m n,
lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle_right _ _ _) (add_lt_add (H m) (H n))⟩ },
let R := finset.sup (finset.range N) (λ n, nndist (u n) (u N)),
refine ⟨↑R + 1, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos R.2 zero_lt_one, λ n, _⟩,
cases le_or_lt N n,
{ exact lt_of_lt_of_le (hN _ h) (le_add_of_nonneg_left R.2) },
{ have : _ ≤ R := finset.le_sup (finset.mem_range.2 h),
exact lt_of_le_of_lt this (lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one) }
end
/-- Yet another metric characterization of Cauchy sequences on integers. This one is often the
most efficient. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0 {s : ℕ → α} : cauchy_seq s ↔ ∃ b : ℕ → ℝ,
(∀ n, 0 ≤ b n) ∧
(∀ n m N : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N) ∧
tendsto b at_top (nhds 0) :=
⟨λ hs, begin
/- `s` is a Cauchy sequence. The sequence `b` will be constructed by taking
the supremum of the distances between `s n` and `s m` for `n m ≥ N`.
First, we prove that all these distances are bounded, as otherwise the Sup
would not make sense. -/
let S := λ N, (λ(p : ℕ × ℕ), dist (s p.1) (s p.2)) '' {p | p.1 ≥ N ∧ p.2 ≥ N},
have hS : ∀ N, ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ S N, y ≤ x,
{ rcases cauchy_seq_bdd hs with ⟨R, R0, hR⟩,
refine λ N, ⟨R, _⟩, rintro _ ⟨⟨m, n⟩, _, rfl⟩,
exact le_of_lt (hR m n) },
have bdd : bdd_above (range (λ(p : ℕ × ℕ), dist (s p.1) (s p.2))),
{ rcases cauchy_seq_bdd hs with ⟨R, R0, hR⟩,
use R, rintro _ ⟨⟨m, n⟩, rfl⟩, exact le_of_lt (hR m n) },
-- Prove that it bounds the distances of points in the Cauchy sequence
have ub : ∀ m n N, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → dist (s m) (s n) ≤ real.Sup (S N) :=
λ m n N hm hn, real.le_Sup _ (hS N) ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨hm, hn⟩, rfl⟩,
have S0m : ∀ n, (0:ℝ) ∈ S n := λ n, ⟨⟨n, n⟩, ⟨le_refl _, le_refl _⟩, dist_self _⟩,
have S0 := λ n, real.le_Sup _ (hS n) (S0m n),
-- Prove that it tends to `0`, by using the Cauchy property of `s`
refine ⟨λ N, real.Sup (S N), S0, ub, metric.tendsto_at_top.2 (λ ε ε0, _)⟩,
refine (metric.cauchy_seq_iff.1 hs (ε/2) (half_pos ε0)).imp (λ N hN n hn, _),
rw [real.dist_0_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (S0 n)],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (real.Sup_le_ub _ ⟨_, S0m _⟩ _) (half_lt_self ε0),
rintro _ ⟨⟨m', n'⟩, ⟨hm', hn'⟩, rfl⟩,
exact le_of_lt (hN _ _ (le_trans hn hm') (le_trans hn hn'))
end,
λ ⟨b, _, b_bound, b_lim⟩, metric.cauchy_seq_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0,
(metric.tendsto_at_top.1 b_lim ε ε0).imp $ λ N hN m n hm hn,
calc dist (s m) (s n) ≤ b N : b_bound m n N hm hn
... ≤ abs (b N) : le_abs_self _
... = dist (b N) 0 : by rw real.dist_0_eq_abs; refl
... < ε : (hN _ (le_refl N)) ⟩
end cauchy_seq
def metric_space.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : function.injective f)
(m : metric_space β) : metric_space α :=
{ dist := λ x y, dist (f x) (f y),
dist_self := λ x, dist_self _,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y h, hf (dist_eq_zero.1 h),
dist_comm := λ x y, dist_comm _ _,
dist_triangle := λ x y z, dist_triangle _ _ _,
edist := λ x y, edist (f x) (f y),
edist_dist := λ x y, edist_dist _ _,
to_uniform_space := uniform_space.comap f m.to_uniform_space,
uniformity_dist := begin
apply @uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity _ _ _ _ _ (λ x y, dist (f x) (f y)),
refine λ s, mem_comap_sets.trans _,
split; intro H,
{ rcases H with ⟨r, ru, rs⟩,
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 ru with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
refine ⟨ε, ε0, λ a b h, rs (hε _)⟩, exact h },
{ rcases H with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
exact ⟨_, dist_mem_uniformity ε0, λ ⟨a, b⟩, hε⟩ }
end }
instance metric_space_subtype {p : α → Prop} [t : metric_space α] : metric_space (subtype p) :=
metric_space.induced subtype.val (λ x y, subtype.eq) t
theorem subtype.dist_eq {p : α → Prop} [t : metric_space α] (x y : subtype p) :
dist x y = dist x.1 y.1 := rfl
section nnreal
instance : metric_space nnreal := by unfold nnreal; apply_instance
end nnreal
section prod
instance prod.metric_space_max [metric_space β] : metric_space (α × β) :=
{ dist := λ x y, max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2),
dist_self := λ x, by simp,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y h, begin
cases max_le_iff.1 (le_of_eq h) with h₁ h₂,
exact prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨dist_le_zero.1 h₁, dist_le_zero.1 h₂⟩
end,
dist_comm := λ x y, by simp [dist_comm],
dist_triangle := λ x y z, max_le
(le_trans (dist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)))
(le_trans (dist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _))),
edist := λ x y, max (edist x.1 y.1) (edist x.2 y.2),
edist_dist := assume x y, begin
have : monotone ennreal.of_real := assume x y h, ennreal.of_real_le_of_real h,
rw [edist_dist, edist_dist, (max_distrib_of_monotone this).symm]
end,
uniformity_dist := begin
refine uniformity_prod.trans _,
simp [uniformity_dist, comap_infi],
rw ← infi_inf_eq, congr, funext,
rw ← infi_inf_eq, congr, funext,
simp [inf_principal, ext_iff, max_lt_iff]
end,
to_uniform_space := prod.uniform_space }
lemma prod.dist_eq [metric_space β] {x y : α × β} :
dist x y = max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) := rfl
end prod
theorem uniform_continuous_dist' : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, dist p.1 p.2) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 (λ ε ε0, ⟨ε/2, half_pos ε0,
begin
suffices,
{ intros p q h, cases p with p₁ p₂, cases q with q₁ q₂,
cases max_lt_iff.1 h with h₁ h₂, clear h,
dsimp at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
rw real.dist_eq,
refine abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨_, _⟩,
{ revert p₁ p₂ q₁ q₂ h₁ h₂, exact this },
{ apply this; rwa dist_comm } },
intros p₁ p₂ q₁ q₂ h₁ h₂,
have := add_lt_add
(abs_sub_lt_iff.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_dist_sub_le p₁ q₁ p₂) h₁)).1
(abs_sub_lt_iff.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_dist_sub_le p₂ q₂ q₁) h₂)).1,
rwa [add_halves, dist_comm p₂, sub_add_sub_cancel, dist_comm q₂] at this
end⟩)
theorem uniform_continuous_dist [uniform_space β] {f g : β → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hg : uniform_continuous g) :
uniform_continuous (λb, dist (f b) (g b)) :=
(hf.prod_mk hg).comp uniform_continuous_dist'
theorem continuous_dist' : continuous (λp:α×α, dist p.1 p.2) :=
uniform_continuous_dist'.continuous
theorem continuous_dist [topological_space β] {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, dist (f b) (g b)) :=
(hf.prod_mk hg).comp continuous_dist'
theorem tendsto_dist {f g : β → α} {x : filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : tendsto f x (nhds a)) (hg : tendsto g x (nhds b)) :
tendsto (λx, dist (f x) (g x)) x (nhds (dist a b)) :=
have tendsto (λp:α×α, dist p.1 p.2) (nhds (a, b)) (nhds (dist a b)),
from continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp continuous_dist' (a, b),
(hf.prod_mk hg).comp (by rw [nhds_prod_eq] at this; exact this)
lemma nhds_comap_dist (a : α) : (nhds (0 : ℝ)).comap (λa', dist a' a) = nhds a :=
have h₁ : ∀ε, (λa', dist a' a) ⁻¹' ball 0 ε ⊆ ball a ε,
by simp [subset_def, real.dist_0_eq_abs],
have h₂ : tendsto (λa', dist a' a) (nhds a) (nhds (dist a a)),
from tendsto_dist tendsto_id tendsto_const_nhds,
le_antisymm
(by simp [h₁, nhds_eq, infi_le_infi, principal_mono,
-le_principal_iff, -le_infi_iff])
(by simpa [map_le_iff_le_comap.symm, tendsto] using h₂)
lemma tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : β → α} {x : filter β} {a : α} :
(tendsto f x (nhds a)) ↔ (tendsto (λb, dist (f b) a) x (nhds 0)) :=
by rw [← nhds_comap_dist a, tendsto_comap_iff]
lemma uniform_continuous_nndist' : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, nndist p.1 p.2) :=
uniform_continuous_subtype_mk uniform_continuous_dist' _
lemma continuous_nndist' : continuous (λp:α×α, nndist p.1 p.2) :=
uniform_continuous_nndist'.continuous
lemma tendsto_nndist' (a b :α) :
tendsto (λp:α×α, nndist p.1 p.2) (filter.prod (nhds a) (nhds b)) (nhds (nndist a b)) :=
by rw [← nhds_prod_eq]; exact continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 continuous_nndist' _
namespace metric
variables {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : set α}
theorem is_closed_ball : is_closed (closed_ball x ε) :=
is_closed_le (continuous_dist continuous_id continuous_const) continuous_const
/-- ε-characterization of the closure in metric spaces-/
theorem mem_closure_iff' {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃b ∈ s, dist a b < ε :=
⟨begin
intros ha ε hε,
have A : ball a ε ∩ s ≠ ∅ := mem_closure_iff.1 ha _ is_open_ball (mem_ball_self hε),
cases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 A with b hb,
simp,
exact ⟨b, ⟨hb.2, by have B := hb.1; simpa [mem_ball'] using B⟩⟩
end,
begin
intros H,
apply mem_closure_iff.2,
intros o ho ao,
rcases is_open_iff.1 ho a ao with ⟨ε, ⟨εpos, hε⟩⟩,
rcases H ε εpos with ⟨b, ⟨bs, bdist⟩⟩,
have B : b ∈ o ∩ s := ⟨hε (by simpa [dist_comm]), bs⟩,
apply ne_empty_of_mem B
end⟩
theorem mem_of_closed' {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s)
{a : α} : a ∈ s ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃b ∈ s, dist a b < ε :=
by simpa only [closure_eq_of_is_closed hs] using @mem_closure_iff' _ _ s a
end metric
section pi
open finset lattice
variables {π : β → Type*} [fintype β] [∀b, metric_space (π b)]
instance has_dist_pi : has_dist (Πb, π b) :=
⟨λf g, ((finset.sup univ (λb, nndist (f b) (g b)) : nnreal) : ℝ)⟩
lemma dist_pi_def (f g : Πb, π b) :
dist f g = (finset.sup univ (λb, nndist (f b) (g b)) : nnreal) := rfl
instance metric_space_pi : metric_space (Πb, π b) :=
{ dist := dist,
dist_self := assume f, (nnreal.coe_eq_zero _).2 $ bot_unique $ finset.sup_le $ by simp,
dist_comm := assume f g, nnreal.eq_iff.2 $ by congr; ext a; exact nndist_comm _ _,
dist_triangle := assume f g h, show dist f h ≤ (dist f g) + (dist g h), from
begin
simp only [dist_pi_def, (nnreal.coe_add _ _).symm, nnreal.coe_le.symm,
finset.sup_le_iff],
assume b hb,
exact le_trans (nndist_triangle _ (g b) _) (add_le_add (le_sup hb) (le_sup hb))
end,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := assume f g eq0,
begin
simp only [dist_pi_def, nnreal.coe_eq_zero, nnreal.bot_eq_zero.symm, eq_bot_iff,
finset.sup_le_iff] at eq0,
exact (funext $ assume b, eq_of_nndist_eq_zero $ bot_unique $ eq0 b $ mem_univ b),
end,
edist := λ f g, finset.sup univ (λb, edist (f b) (g b)),
edist_dist := assume x y, begin
have A : sup univ (λ (b : β), ((nndist (x b) (y b)) : ennreal)) = ↑(sup univ (λ (b : β), nndist (x b) (y b))),
{ refine eq.symm (comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ _ _),
exact (assume x y h, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 h), refl },
simp [dist, edist_nndist, ennreal.of_real, A]
end }
end pi
section compact
/-- Any compact set in a metric space can be covered by finitely many balls of a given positive
radius -/
lemma finite_cover_balls_of_compact {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {s : set α}
(hs : compact s) {e : ℝ} (he : e > 0) :
∃t ⊆ s, finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃x∈t, ball x e :=
begin
apply compact_elim_finite_subcover_image hs,
{ simp [is_open_ball] },
{ intros x xs,
simp,
exact ⟨x, ⟨xs, by simpa⟩⟩ }
end
end compact
section proper_space
open metric
/-- A metric space is proper if all closed balls are compact. -/
class proper_space (α : Type u) [metric_space α] : Prop :=
(compact_ball : ∀x:α, ∀r, compact (closed_ball x r))
/- A compact metric space is proper -/
instance proper_of_compact [metric_space α] [compact_space α] : proper_space α :=
⟨assume x r, compact_of_is_closed_subset compact_univ is_closed_ball (subset_univ _)⟩
/-- A proper space is locally compact -/
instance locally_compact_of_proper [metric_space α] [proper_space α] :
locally_compact_space α :=
begin
apply locally_compact_of_compact_nhds,
intros x,
existsi closed_ball x 1,
split,
{ apply mem_nhds_iff.2,
existsi (1 : ℝ),
simp,
exact ⟨zero_lt_one, ball_subset_closed_ball⟩ },
{ apply proper_space.compact_ball }
end
/-- A proper space is complete -/
instance complete_of_proper {α : Type u} [metric_space α] [proper_space α] : complete_space α :=
⟨begin
intros f hf,
/- We want to show that the Cauchy filter `f` is converging. It suffices to find a closed
ball (therefore compact by properness) where it is nontrivial. -/
have A : ∃ t ∈ f.sets, ∀ x y ∈ t, dist x y < 1 := (metric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 1 zero_lt_one,
rcases A with ⟨t, ⟨t_fset, ht⟩⟩,
rcases inhabited_of_mem_sets hf.1 t_fset with ⟨x, xt⟩,
have : t ⊆ closed_ball x 1 := by intros y yt; simp [dist_comm]; apply le_of_lt (ht x y xt yt),
have : closed_ball x 1 ∈ f.sets := f.sets_of_superset t_fset this,
rcases (compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 (proper_space.compact_ball x 1)).2 f hf (le_principal_iff.2 this)
with ⟨y, _, hy⟩,
exact ⟨y, hy⟩
end⟩
/-- A proper metric space is separable, and therefore second countable. Indeed, any ball is
compact, and therefore admits a countable dense subset. Taking a countable union over the balls
centered at a fixed point and with integer radius, one obtains a countable set which is
dense in the whole space. -/
instance second_countable_of_proper [metric_space α] [proper_space α] :
second_countable_topology α :=
begin
/- We show that the space admits a countable dense subset. The case where the space is empty
is special, and trivial. -/
have A : (univ : set α) = ∅ → ∃(s : set α), countable s ∧ closure s = (univ : set α) :=
assume H, ⟨∅, ⟨by simp, by simp; exact H.symm⟩⟩,
have B : (univ : set α) ≠ ∅ → ∃(s : set α), countable s ∧ closure s = (univ : set α) :=
begin
/- When the space is not empty, we take a point `x` in the space, and then a countable set
`T r` which is dense in the closed ball `closed_ball x r` for each `r`. Then the set
`t = ⋃ T n` (where the union is over all integers `n`) is countable, as a countable union
of countable sets, and dense in the space by construction. -/
assume non_empty,
rcases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 non_empty with ⟨x, x_univ⟩,
choose T a using show ∀ (r:ℝ), ∃ t ⊆ closed_ball x r, (countable (t : set α) ∧ closed_ball x r = closure t),
from assume r, emetric.countable_closure_of_compact (proper_space.compact_ball _ _),
let t := (⋃n:ℕ, T (n : ℝ)),
have T₁ : countable t := by finish [countable_Union],
have T₂ : closure t ⊆ univ := by simp,
have T₃ : univ ⊆ closure t :=
begin
intros y y_univ,
rcases exists_nat_gt (dist y x) with ⟨n, n_large⟩,
have h : y ∈ closed_ball x (n : ℝ) := by simp; apply le_of_lt n_large,
have h' : closed_ball x (n : ℝ) = closure (T (n : ℝ)) := by finish,
have : y ∈ closure (T (n : ℝ)) := by rwa h' at h,
show y ∈ closure t, from mem_of_mem_of_subset this (by apply closure_mono; apply subset_Union (λ(n:ℕ), T (n:ℝ))),
end,
exact ⟨t, ⟨T₁, subset.antisymm T₂ T₃⟩⟩
end,
haveI : separable_space α := ⟨by_cases A B⟩,
apply emetric.second_countable_of_separable,
end
end proper_space
namespace metric
section second_countable
open topological_space
/-- A metric space is second countable if, for every ε > 0, there is a countable set which is ε-dense. -/
lemma second_countable_of_almost_dense_set
(H : ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ s : set α, countable s ∧ (∀x, ∃y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ ε)) :
second_countable_topology α :=
begin
choose T T_dense using H,
have I1 : ∀n:ℕ, (n:ℝ) + 1 > 0 :=
λn, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_add_of_nonneg_left (nat.cast_nonneg _)),
have I : ∀n:ℕ, (n+1 : ℝ)⁻¹ > 0 := λn, inv_pos'.2 (I1 n),
let t := ⋃n:ℕ, T (n+1)⁻¹ (I n),
have count_t : countable t := by finish [countable_Union],
have clos_t : closure t = univ,
{ refine subset.antisymm (subset_univ _) (λx xuniv, mem_closure_iff'.2 (λε εpos, _)),
rcases exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹ with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have : ε⁻¹ < n + 1 := lt_of_lt_of_le hn (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one),
have nε : ((n:ℝ)+1)⁻¹ < ε := (inv_lt (I1 n) εpos).2 this,
rcases (T_dense (n+1)⁻¹ (I n)).2 x with ⟨y, yT, Dxy⟩,
have : y ∈ t := mem_of_mem_of_subset yT (by apply subset_Union (λ (n:ℕ), T (n+1)⁻¹ (I n))),
exact ⟨y, this, lt_of_le_of_lt Dxy nε⟩ },
haveI : separable_space α := ⟨⟨t, ⟨count_t, clos_t⟩⟩⟩,
exact emetric.second_countable_of_separable α
end
/-- A metric space space is second countable if one can reconstruct up to any ε>0 any element of the
space from countably many data. -/
lemma second_countable_of_countable_discretization {α : Type u} [metric_space α]
(H : ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ (β : Type u) [encodable β] (F : α → β), ∀x y, F x = F y → dist x y ≤ ε) :
second_countable_topology α :=
begin
classical, by_cases hs : (univ : set α) = ∅,
{ haveI : compact_space α := ⟨by rw hs; exact compact_of_finite (set.finite_empty)⟩, by apply_instance },
rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty hs with ⟨x0, hx0⟩,
letI : inhabited α := ⟨x0⟩,
refine second_countable_of_almost_dense_set (λε ε0, _),
rcases H ε ε0 with ⟨β, fβ, F, hF⟩,
let Finv := function.inv_fun F,
refine ⟨range Finv, ⟨countable_range _, λx, _⟩⟩,
let x' := Finv (F x),
have : F x' = F x := function.inv_fun_eq ⟨x, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨x', mem_range_self _, hF _ _ this.symm⟩
end
end second_countable
end metric
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma_of_metric
{s : set α} {ι} {c : ι → set α} (hs : compact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i, is_open (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, ball x δ ⊆ c i :=
let ⟨n, en, hn⟩ := lebesgue_number_lemma hs hc₁ hc₂,
⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 en in
⟨δ, δ0, assume x hx, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn x hx in
⟨i, assume y hy, hi (hδ (mem_ball'.mp hy))⟩⟩
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma_of_metric_sUnion
{s : set α} {c : set (set α)} (hs : compact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, is_open t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ball x δ ⊆ t :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union at hc₂;
simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma_of_metric hs (by simpa) hc₂
namespace metric
/-- Boundedness of a subset of a metric space. We formulate the definition to work
even in the empty space. -/
def bounded (s : set α) : Prop :=
∃C, ∀x y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ C
section bounded
variables {x : α} {s t : set α} {r : ℝ}
@[simp] lemma bounded_empty : bounded (∅ : set α) :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma bounded_iff_mem_bounded : bounded s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, bounded s :=
⟨λ h _ _, h, λ H, begin
classical, by_cases s = ∅,
{ subst s, exact ⟨0, by simp⟩ },
{ rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact H x hx }
end⟩
/-- Subsets of a bounded set are also bounded -/
lemma bounded.subset (incl : s ⊆ t) : bounded t → bounded s :=
Exists.imp $ λ C hC x y hx hy, hC x y (incl hx) (incl hy)
/-- Closed balls are bounded -/
lemma bounded_closed_ball : bounded (closed_ball x r) :=
⟨r + r, λ y z hy hz, begin
simp only [mem_closed_ball] at *,
calc dist y z ≤ dist y x + dist z x : dist_triangle_right _ _ _
... ≤ r + r : add_le_add hy hz
end⟩
/-- Open balls are bounded -/
lemma bounded_ball : bounded (ball x r) :=
bounded_closed_ball.subset ball_subset_closed_ball
/-- Given a point, a bounded subset is included in some ball around this point -/
lemma bounded_iff_subset_ball (c : α) : bounded s ↔ ∃r, s ⊆ closed_ball c r :=
begin
split; rintro ⟨C, hC⟩,
{ classical, by_cases s = ∅,
{ subst s, exact ⟨0, by simp⟩ },
{ rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact ⟨C + dist x c, λ y hy, calc
dist y c ≤ dist y x + dist x c : dist_triangle _ _ _
... ≤ C + dist x c : add_le_add_right (hC y x hy hx) _⟩ } },
{ exact bounded_closed_ball.subset hC }
end
/-- The union of two bounded sets is bounded iff each of the sets is bounded -/
@[simp] lemma bounded_union :
bounded (s ∪ t) ↔ bounded s ∧ bounded t :=
⟨λh, ⟨h.subset (by simp), h.subset (by simp)⟩,
begin
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩,
refine bounded_iff_mem_bounded.2 (λ x _, _),
rw bounded_iff_subset_ball x at hs ht ⊢,
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hCs⟩, rcases ht with ⟨Ct, hCt⟩,
exact ⟨max Cs Ct, union_subset
(subset.trans hCs $ closed_ball_subset_closed_ball $ le_max_left _ _)
(subset.trans hCt $ closed_ball_subset_closed_ball $ le_max_right _ _)⟩,
end⟩
/-- A finite union of bounded sets is bounded -/
lemma bounded_bUnion {I : set β} {s : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
bounded (⋃i∈I, s i) ↔ ∀i ∈ I, bounded (s i) :=
finite.induction_on H (by simp) $ λ x I _ _ IH,
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, IH]
/-- A compact set is bounded -/
lemma bounded_of_compact {s : set α} (h : compact s) : bounded s :=
-- We cover the compact set by finitely many balls of radius 1,
-- and then argue that a finite union of bounded sets is bounded
let ⟨t, ht, fint, subs⟩ := finite_cover_balls_of_compact h zero_lt_one in
bounded.subset subs $ (bounded_bUnion fint).2 $ λ i hi, bounded_ball
/-- A finite set is bounded -/
lemma bounded_of_finite {s : set α} (h : finite s) : bounded s :=
bounded_of_compact $ compact_of_finite h
/-- A singleton is bounded -/
lemma bounded_singleton {x : α} : bounded ({x} : set α) :=
bounded_of_finite $ finite_singleton _
/-- Characterization of the boundedness of the range of a function -/
lemma bounded_range_iff {f : β → α} : bounded (range f) ↔ ∃C, ∀x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
exists_congr $ λ C, ⟨
λ H x y, H _ _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩,
by rintro H _ _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact H x y⟩
/-- In a compact space, all sets are bounded -/
lemma bounded_of_compact_space [compact_space α] : bounded s :=
(bounded_of_compact compact_univ).subset (subset_univ _)
/-- In a proper space, a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded -/
lemma compact_iff_closed_bounded [proper_space α] :
compact s ↔ is_closed s ∧ bounded s :=
⟨λ h, ⟨closed_of_compact _ h, bounded_of_compact h⟩, begin
rintro ⟨hc, hb⟩,
classical, by_cases s = ∅, {simp [h, compact_empty]},
rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
rcases (bounded_iff_subset_ball x).1 hb with ⟨r, hr⟩,
exact compact_of_is_closed_subset (proper_space.compact_ball x r) hc hr
end⟩
end bounded
section diam
variables {s : set α} {x y : α}
/-- The diameter of a set in a metric space. To get controllable behavior even when the diameter
should be infinite, we express it in terms of the emetric.diameter -/
def diam (s : set α) : ℝ := ennreal.to_real (emetric.diam s)
/-- The diameter of a set is always nonnegative -/
lemma diam_nonneg : 0 ≤ diam s :=
by simp [diam]
/-- The empty set has zero diameter -/
@[simp] lemma diam_empty : diam (∅ : set α) = 0 :=
by simp [diam]
/-- A singleton has zero diameter -/
@[simp] lemma diam_singleton : diam ({x} : set α) = 0 :=
by simp [diam]
/-- Characterize the boundedness of a set in terms of the finiteness of its emetric.diameter. -/
lemma bounded_iff_diam_ne_top : bounded s ↔ emetric.diam s ≠ ⊤ :=
begin
classical, by_cases hs : s = ∅,
{ simp [hs] },
{ rcases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 hs with ⟨x, hx⟩,
split,
{ assume bs,
rcases (bounded_iff_subset_ball x).1 bs with ⟨r, hr⟩,
have r0 : 0 ≤ r := by simpa [closed_ball] using hr hx,
have : emetric.diam s < ⊤ := calc
emetric.diam s ≤ emetric.diam (emetric.closed_ball x (ennreal.of_real r)) :
by rw emetric_closed_ball r0; exact emetric.diam_mono hr
... ≤ 2 * (ennreal.of_real r) : emetric.diam_closed_ball
... < ⊤ : begin apply ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.2, simp [ennreal.mul_eq_top], end,
exact ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 this },
{ assume ds,
have : s ⊆ closed_ball x (ennreal.to_real (emetric.diam s)),
{ rw [← emetric_closed_ball ennreal.to_real_nonneg, ennreal.of_real_to_real ds],
exact λy hy, emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hy hx },
exact bounded.subset this (bounded_closed_ball) }}
end
/-- An unbounded set has zero diameter. If you would prefer to get the value ∞, use `emetric.diam`.
This lemma makes it possible to avoid side conditions in some situations -/
lemma diam_eq_zero_of_unbounded (h : ¬(bounded s)) : diam s = 0 :=
begin
simp only [bounded_iff_diam_ne_top, not_not, ne.def] at h,
simp [diam, h]
end
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then the diameter of `s` is bounded by that of `t`, provided `t` is bounded. -/
lemma diam_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : bounded t) : diam s ≤ diam t :=
begin
unfold diam,
rw ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (bounded_iff_diam_ne_top.1 (bounded.subset h ht)) (bounded_iff_diam_ne_top.1 ht),
exact emetric.diam_mono h
end
/-- The distance between two points in a set is controlled by the diameter of the set. -/
lemma dist_le_diam_of_mem (h : bounded s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : dist x y ≤ diam s :=
begin
rw [diam, dist_edist],
rw ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (edist_ne_top _ _) (bounded_iff_diam_ne_top.1 h),
exact emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy
end
/-- If the distance between any two points in a set is bounded by some constant, this constant
bounds the diameter. -/
lemma diam_le_of_forall_dist_le {d : real} (hd : d ≥ 0) (h : ∀x y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ d) : diam s ≤ d :=
begin
have I : emetric.diam s ≤ ennreal.of_real d,
{ refine emetric.diam_le_of_forall_edist_le (λx y hx hy, _),
rw [edist_dist],
exact ennreal.of_real_le_of_real (h x y hx hy) },
have A : emetric.diam s ≠ ⊤ :=
ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt I (ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 (by simp))),
rw [← ennreal.to_real_of_real hd, diam, ennreal.to_real_le_to_real A],
{ exact I },
{ simp }
end
/-- The diameter of a union is controlled by the sum of the diameters, and the distance between
any two points in each of the sets. This lemma is true without any side condition, since it is
obviously true if `s ∪ t` is unbounded. -/
lemma diam_union {t : set α} (xs : x ∈ s) (yt : y ∈ t) : diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t :=
have I1 : ¬(bounded (s ∪ t)) → diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := λh, calc
diam (s ∪ t) = 0 + 0 + 0 : by simp [diam_eq_zero_of_unbounded h]
... ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t : add_le_add (add_le_add diam_nonneg dist_nonneg) diam_nonneg,
have I2 : (bounded (s ∪ t)) → diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := λh,
begin
have : bounded s := bounded.subset (subset_union_left _ _) h,
have : bounded t := bounded.subset (subset_union_right _ _) h,
have A : ∀a ∈ s, ∀b ∈ t, dist a b ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := λa ha b hb, calc
dist a b ≤ dist a x + dist x y + dist y b : dist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
... ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t :
add_le_add (add_le_add (dist_le_diam_of_mem ‹bounded s› ha xs) (le_refl _)) (dist_le_diam_of_mem ‹bounded t› yt hb),
have B : ∀a b ∈ s ∪ t, dist a b ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := λa b ha hb,
begin
cases (mem_union _ _ _).1 ha with h'a h'a; cases (mem_union _ _ _).1 hb with h'b h'b,
{ calc dist a b ≤ diam s : dist_le_diam_of_mem ‹bounded s› h'a h'b
... = diam s + (0 + 0) : by simp
... ≤ diam s + (dist x y + diam t) : add_le_add (le_refl _) (add_le_add dist_nonneg diam_nonneg)
... = diam s + dist x y + diam t : by simp only [add_comm, eq_self_iff_true, add_left_comm] },
{ exact A a h'a b h'b },
{ have Z := A b h'b a h'a, rwa [dist_comm] at Z },
{ calc dist a b ≤ diam t : dist_le_diam_of_mem ‹bounded t› h'a h'b
... = (0 + 0) + diam t : by simp
... ≤ (diam s + dist x y) + diam t : add_le_add (add_le_add diam_nonneg dist_nonneg) (le_refl _) }
end,
have C : 0 ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := calc
0 = 0 + 0 + 0 : by simp
... ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t : add_le_add (add_le_add diam_nonneg dist_nonneg) diam_nonneg,
exact diam_le_of_forall_dist_le C B
end,
classical.by_cases I2 I1
/-- If two sets intersect, the diameter of the union is bounded by the sum of the diameters. -/
lemma diam_union' {t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + diam t :=
begin
rcases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 h with ⟨x, ⟨xs, xt⟩⟩,
simpa using diam_union xs xt
end
/-- The diameter of a closed ball of radius `r` is at most `2 r`. -/
lemma diam_closed_ball {r : ℝ} (h : r ≥ 0) : diam (closed_ball x r) ≤ 2 * r :=
diam_le_of_forall_dist_le (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) h) $ λa b ha hb, calc
dist a b ≤ dist a x + dist b x : dist_triangle_right _ _ _
... ≤ r + r : add_le_add ha hb
... = 2 * r : by simp [mul_two, mul_comm]
/-- The diameter of a ball of radius `r` is at most `2 r`. -/
lemma diam_ball {r : ℝ} (h : r ≥ 0) : diam (ball x r) ≤ 2 * r :=
le_trans (diam_mono ball_subset_closed_ball bounded_closed_ball) (diam_closed_ball h)
end diam
end metric
|
00d5364b383ceaabe85fb28a8488e351ce8f8ed7 | 8b9f17008684d796c8022dab552e42f0cb6fb347 | /tests/lean/hott/tele_eq.hlean | abc8f602f4679af4e902fff0f4a2e9d3430482ce | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | chubbymaggie/lean | 0d06ae25f9dd396306fb02190e89422ea94afd7b | d2c7b5c31928c98f545b16420d37842c43b4ae9a | refs/heads/master | 1,611,313,622,901 | 1,430,266,839,000 | 1,430,267,083,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 586 | hlean | constant A₁ : Type
constant A₂ : A₁ → Type
constant A₃ : Π (a₁ : A₁), A₂ a₁ → Type
structure foo :=
mk :: (a₁ : A₁) (a₂ : A₂ a₁) (a₃ : A₃ a₁ a₂)
theorem foo.eq {a₁ b₁ : A₁} {a₂ : A₂ a₁} {b₂ : A₂ b₁} {a₃ : A₃ a₁ a₂} {b₃ : A₃ b₁ b₂}
(H₁ : a₁ = b₁) (H₂ : eq.rec_on H₁ a₂ = b₂) (H₃ : eq.rec_on H₂ (eq.rec_on H₁ a₃) = b₃)
: foo.mk a₁ a₂ a₃ = foo.mk b₁ b₂ b₃ :=
begin
cases H₁,
cases H₂,
cases H₃,
apply rfl
end
print definition foo.eq
|
a62442a026e931786469d26b43b4e2c642adfb0d | 947fa6c38e48771ae886239b4edce6db6e18d0fb | /src/algebra/big_operators/ring.lean | 7d5e7727e114e2f89e89155550db5cb82f7336a2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ramonfmir/mathlib | c5dc8b33155473fab97c38bd3aa6723dc289beaa | 14c52e990c17f5a00c0cc9e09847af16fabbed25 | refs/heads/master | 1,661,979,343,526 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 182,072,989 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,585,876,000 | 1,555,585,876,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,177 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import algebra.field.basic
import data.finset.pi
import data.finset.powerset
/-!
# Results about big operators with values in a (semi)ring
We prove results about big operators that involve some interaction between
multiplicative and additive structures on the values being combined.
-/
universes u v w
open_locale big_operators
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace finset
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} {b : β} {f g : α → β}
section comm_monoid
variables [comm_monoid β]
open_locale classical
lemma prod_pow_eq_pow_sum {x : β} {f : α → ℕ} :
∀ {s : finset α}, (∏ i in s, x ^ (f i)) = x ^ (∑ x in s, f x) :=
begin
apply finset.induction,
{ simp },
{ assume a s has H,
rw [finset.prod_insert has, finset.sum_insert has, pow_add, H] }
end
end comm_monoid
section semiring
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring β]
lemma sum_mul : (∑ x in s, f x) * b = ∑ x in s, f x * b :=
add_monoid_hom.map_sum (add_monoid_hom.mul_right b) _ s
lemma mul_sum : b * (∑ x in s, f x) = ∑ x in s, b * f x :=
add_monoid_hom.map_sum (add_monoid_hom.mul_left b) _ s
lemma sum_mul_sum {ι₁ : Type*} {ι₂ : Type*} (s₁ : finset ι₁) (s₂ : finset ι₂)
(f₁ : ι₁ → β) (f₂ : ι₂ → β) :
(∑ x₁ in s₁, f₁ x₁) * (∑ x₂ in s₂, f₂ x₂) = ∑ p in s₁ ×ˢ s₂, f₁ p.1 * f₂ p.2 :=
by { rw [sum_product, sum_mul, sum_congr rfl], intros, rw mul_sum }
end semiring
section semiring
variables [non_assoc_semiring β]
lemma sum_mul_boole [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
(∑ x in s, (f x * ite (a = x) 1 0)) = ite (a ∈ s) (f a) 0 :=
by simp
lemma sum_boole_mul [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
(∑ x in s, (ite (a = x) 1 0) * f x) = ite (a ∈ s) (f a) 0 :=
by simp
end semiring
lemma sum_div [division_ring β] {s : finset α} {f : α → β} {b : β} :
(∑ x in s, f x) / b = ∑ x in s, f x / b :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring β]
/-- The product over a sum can be written as a sum over the product of sets, `finset.pi`.
`finset.prod_univ_sum` is an alternative statement when the product is over `univ`. -/
lemma prod_sum {δ : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] [∀a, decidable_eq (δ a)]
{s : finset α} {t : Πa, finset (δ a)} {f : Πa, δ a → β} :
(∏ a in s, ∑ b in (t a), f a b) =
∑ p in (s.pi t), ∏ x in s.attach, f x.1 (p x.1 x.2) :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction with a s ha ih,
{ rw [pi_empty, sum_singleton], refl },
{ have h₁ : ∀x ∈ t a, ∀y ∈ t a, ∀h : x ≠ y,
disjoint (image (pi.cons s a x) (pi s t)) (image (pi.cons s a y) (pi s t)),
{ assume x hx y hy h,
simp only [disjoint_iff_ne, mem_image],
rintros _ ⟨p₂, hp, eq₂⟩ _ ⟨p₃, hp₃, eq₃⟩ eq,
have : pi.cons s a x p₂ a (mem_insert_self _ _) = pi.cons s a y p₃ a (mem_insert_self _ _),
{ rw [eq₂, eq₃, eq] },
rw [pi.cons_same, pi.cons_same] at this,
exact h this },
rw [prod_insert ha, pi_insert ha, ih, sum_mul, sum_bUnion h₁],
refine sum_congr rfl (λ b _, _),
have h₂ : ∀p₁∈pi s t, ∀p₂∈pi s t, pi.cons s a b p₁ = pi.cons s a b p₂ → p₁ = p₂, from
assume p₁ h₁ p₂ h₂ eq, pi_cons_injective ha eq,
rw [sum_image h₂, mul_sum],
refine sum_congr rfl (λ g _, _),
rw [attach_insert, prod_insert, prod_image],
{ simp only [pi.cons_same],
congr' with ⟨v, hv⟩, congr',
exact (pi.cons_ne (by rintro rfl; exact ha hv)).symm },
{ exact λ _ _ _ _, subtype.eq ∘ subtype.mk.inj },
{ simp only [mem_image], rintro ⟨⟨_, hm⟩, _, rfl⟩, exact ha hm } }
end
open_locale classical
/-- The product of `f a + g a` over all of `s` is the sum
over the powerset of `s` of the product of `f` over a subset `t` times
the product of `g` over the complement of `t` -/
lemma prod_add (f g : α → β) (s : finset α) :
∏ a in s, (f a + g a) = ∑ t in s.powerset, ((∏ a in t, f a) * (∏ a in (s \ t), g a)) :=
calc ∏ a in s, (f a + g a)
= ∏ a in s, ∑ p in ({true, false} : finset Prop), if p then f a else g a : by simp
... = ∑ p in (s.pi (λ _, {true, false}) : finset (Π a ∈ s, Prop)),
∏ a in s.attach, if p a.1 a.2 then f a.1 else g a.1 : prod_sum
... = ∑ t in s.powerset, (∏ a in t, f a) * (∏ a in (s \ t), g a) : begin
refine eq.symm (sum_bij (λ t _ a _, a ∈ t) _ _ _ _),
{ simp [subset_iff]; tauto },
{ intros t ht,
erw [prod_ite (λ a : {a // a ∈ s}, f a.1) (λ a : {a // a ∈ s}, g a.1)],
refine congr_arg2 _
(prod_bij (λ (a : α) (ha : a ∈ t), ⟨a, mem_powerset.1 ht ha⟩)
_ _ _
(λ b hb, ⟨b, by cases b;
simpa only [true_and, exists_prop, mem_filter, and_true, mem_attach, eq_self_iff_true,
subtype.coe_mk] using hb⟩))
(prod_bij (λ (a : α) (ha : a ∈ s \ t), ⟨a, by simp * at *⟩)
_ _ _
(λ b hb, ⟨b, by cases b; begin
simp only [true_and, mem_filter, mem_attach, subtype.coe_mk] at hb,
simpa only [true_and, exists_prop, and_true, mem_sdiff, eq_self_iff_true, subtype.coe_mk,
b_property],
end⟩));
intros; simp * at *; simp * at * },
{ assume a₁ a₂ h₁ h₂ H,
ext x,
simp only [function.funext_iff, subset_iff, mem_powerset, eq_iff_iff] at h₁ h₂ H,
exact ⟨λ hx, (H x (h₁ hx)).1 hx, λ hx, (H x (h₂ hx)).2 hx⟩ },
{ assume f hf,
exact ⟨s.filter (λ a : α, ∃ h : a ∈ s, f a h),
by simp, by funext; intros; simp *⟩ }
end
/-- `∏ i, (f i + g i) = (∏ i, f i) + ∑ i, g i * (∏ j < i, f j + g j) * (∏ j > i, f j)`. -/
lemma prod_add_ordered {ι R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [linear_order ι] (s : finset ι)
(f g : ι → R) :
(∏ i in s, (f i + g i)) = (∏ i in s, f i) +
∑ i in s, g i * (∏ j in s.filter (< i), (f j + g j)) * ∏ j in s.filter (λ j, i < j), f j :=
begin
refine finset.induction_on_max s (by simp) _,
clear s, intros a s ha ihs,
have ha' : a ∉ s, from λ ha', (ha a ha').false,
rw [prod_insert ha', prod_insert ha', sum_insert ha', filter_insert, if_neg (lt_irrefl a),
filter_true_of_mem ha, ihs, add_mul, mul_add, mul_add, add_assoc],
congr' 1, rw add_comm, congr' 1,
{ rw [filter_false_of_mem, prod_empty, mul_one],
exact (forall_mem_insert _ _ _).2 ⟨lt_irrefl a, λ i hi, (ha i hi).not_lt⟩ },
{ rw mul_sum,
refine sum_congr rfl (λ i hi, _),
rw [filter_insert, if_neg (ha i hi).not_lt, filter_insert, if_pos (ha i hi), prod_insert,
mul_left_comm],
exact mt (λ ha, (mem_filter.1 ha).1) ha' }
end
/-- `∏ i, (f i - g i) = (∏ i, f i) - ∑ i, g i * (∏ j < i, f j - g j) * (∏ j > i, f j)`. -/
lemma prod_sub_ordered {ι R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [linear_order ι] (s : finset ι) (f g : ι → R) :
(∏ i in s, (f i - g i)) = (∏ i in s, f i) -
∑ i in s, g i * (∏ j in s.filter (< i), (f j - g j)) * ∏ j in s.filter (λ j, i < j), f j :=
begin
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg],
convert prod_add_ordered s f (λ i, -g i),
simp,
end
/-- `∏ i, (1 - f i) = 1 - ∑ i, f i * (∏ j < i, 1 - f j)`. This formula is useful in construction of
a partition of unity from a collection of “bump” functions. -/
lemma prod_one_sub_ordered {ι R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [linear_order ι] (s : finset ι) (f : ι → R) :
(∏ i in s, (1 - f i)) = 1 - ∑ i in s, f i * ∏ j in s.filter (< i), (1 - f j) :=
by { rw prod_sub_ordered, simp }
/-- Summing `a^s.card * b^(n-s.card)` over all finite subsets `s` of a `finset`
gives `(a + b)^s.card`.-/
lemma sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow
{α R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (a b : R) (s : finset α) :
(∑ t in s.powerset, a ^ t.card * b ^ (s.card - t.card)) = (a + b) ^ s.card :=
begin
rw [← prod_const, prod_add],
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ t ht, _),
rw [prod_const, prod_const, ← card_sdiff (mem_powerset.1 ht)]
end
theorem dvd_sum {b : β} {s : finset α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, b ∣ f x) : b ∣ ∑ x in s, f x :=
multiset.dvd_sum (λ y hy, by rcases multiset.mem_map.1 hy with ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact h x hx)
@[norm_cast]
lemma prod_nat_cast (s : finset α) (f : α → ℕ) :
↑(∏ x in s, f x : ℕ) = (∏ x in s, (f x : β)) :=
(nat.cast_ring_hom β).map_prod f s
end comm_semiring
section comm_ring
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
lemma prod_range_cast_nat_sub (n k : ℕ) :
∏ i in range k, (n - i : R) = (∏ i in range k, (n - i) : ℕ) :=
begin
rw prod_nat_cast,
cases le_or_lt k n with hkn hnk,
{ exact prod_congr rfl (λ i hi, (nat.cast_sub $ (mem_range.1 hi).le.trans hkn).symm) },
{ rw ← mem_range at hnk,
rw [prod_eq_zero hnk, prod_eq_zero hnk]; simp }
end
end comm_ring
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_insert [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid β] {s : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s)
(f : finset α → β) :
(∏ a in (insert x s).powerset, f a) =
(∏ a in s.powerset, f a) * (∏ t in s.powerset, f (insert x t)) :=
begin
rw [powerset_insert, finset.prod_union, finset.prod_image],
{ assume t₁ h₁ t₂ h₂ heq,
rw [← finset.erase_insert (not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem h₁ h),
← finset.erase_insert (not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem h₂ h), heq] },
{ rw finset.disjoint_iff_ne,
assume t₁ h₁ t₂ h₂,
rcases finset.mem_image.1 h₂ with ⟨t₃, h₃, H₃₂⟩,
rw ← H₃₂,
exact ne_insert_of_not_mem _ _ (not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem h₁ h) }
end
/-- A product over `powerset s` is equal to the double product over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over `powerset s` is equal to the double sum over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`"]
lemma prod_powerset [comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (f : finset α → β) :
∏ t in powerset s, f t = ∏ j in range (card s + 1), ∏ t in powerset_len j s, f t :=
begin
classical,
rw [powerset_card_bUnion, prod_bUnion],
intros i hi j hj hij,
rw [function.on_fun, powerset_len_eq_filter, powerset_len_eq_filter, disjoint_filter],
intros x hx hc hnc,
apply hij,
rwa ← hc,
end
lemma sum_range_succ_mul_sum_range_succ [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring β] (n k : ℕ) (f g : ℕ → β) :
(∑ i in range (n+1), f i) * (∑ i in range (k+1), g i) =
(∑ i in range n, f i) * (∑ i in range k, g i) +
f n * (∑ i in range k, g i) +
(∑ i in range n, f i) * g k +
f n * g k :=
by simp only [add_mul, mul_add, add_assoc, sum_range_succ]
end finset
|
84f79361a539594333d5ad39938f5df411475e31 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Attributes.lean | 3e41e9e50c16e2239516949cc6bbb22577076d40 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,836 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Parser.Attr
import Lean.Attributes
import Lean.MonadEnv
import Lean.Elab.Util
namespace Lean.Elab
structure Attribute where
kind : AttributeKind := AttributeKind.global
name : Name
stx : Syntax := Syntax.missing
deriving Inhabited
instance : ToFormat Attribute where
format attr :=
let kindStr := match attr.kind with
| AttributeKind.global => ""
| AttributeKind.local => "local "
| AttributeKind.scoped => "scoped "
Format.bracket "@[" f!"{kindStr}{attr.name}{toString attr.stx}" "]"
/--
```
attrKind := leading_parser optional («scoped» <|> «local»)
```
-/
def toAttributeKind (attrKindStx : Syntax) : MacroM AttributeKind := do
if attrKindStx[0].isNone then
return AttributeKind.global
else if attrKindStx[0][0].getKind == ``Lean.Parser.Term.scoped then
if (← Macro.getCurrNamespace).isAnonymous then
throw <| Macro.Exception.error (← getRef) "scoped attributes must be used inside namespaces"
return AttributeKind.scoped
else
return AttributeKind.local
def mkAttrKindGlobal : Syntax :=
mkNode ``Lean.Parser.Term.attrKind #[mkNullNode]
def elabAttr [Monad m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadResolveName m] [MonadError m] [MonadMacroAdapter m] [MonadRecDepth m] [MonadTrace m] [MonadOptions m] [AddMessageContext m] [MonadInfoTree m] (attrInstance : Syntax) : m Attribute := do
/- attrInstance := ppGroup $ leading_parser attrKind >> attrParser -/
let attrKind ← liftMacroM <| toAttributeKind attrInstance[0]
let attr := attrInstance[1]
let attr ← liftMacroM <| expandMacros attr
let attrName ← if attr.getKind == ``Parser.Attr.simple then
pure attr[0].getId.eraseMacroScopes
else match attr.getKind with
| .str _ s => pure <| Name.mkSimple s
| _ => throwErrorAt attr "unknown attribute"
let .ok impl := getAttributeImpl (← getEnv) attrName
| throwError "unknown attribute [{attrName}]"
let attrSyntaxNodeKind := attrInstance[1].getKind
-- `Lean.Parser.Attr.simple` is a generic `attribute` parser used in simple attributes.
-- We don't want to create an info tree node from a simple attribute to the generic parser.
let declTarget := if attrSyntaxNodeKind == ``Lean.Parser.Attr.simple then impl.ref else attrSyntaxNodeKind
if (← getEnv).contains declTarget && (← getInfoState).enabled then
pushInfoLeaf <| .ofCommandInfo {
elaborator := declTarget -- not truly an elaborator, but a sensible target for go-to-definition
stx := attrInstance[1][0] -- We want to associate the information to the first atom only
}
/- The `AttrM` does not have sufficient information for expanding macros in `args`.
So, we expand them before here before we invoke the attributer handlers implemented using `AttrM`. -/
return { kind := attrKind, name := attrName, stx := attr }
def elabAttrs [Monad m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadResolveName m] [MonadError m] [MonadMacroAdapter m] [MonadRecDepth m] [MonadTrace m] [MonadOptions m] [AddMessageContext m] [MonadLog m] [MonadInfoTree m] [MonadLiftT IO m] (attrInstances : Array Syntax) : m (Array Attribute) := do
let mut attrs := #[]
for attr in attrInstances do
try
attrs := attrs.push (← withRef attr do elabAttr attr)
catch ex =>
logException ex
return attrs
-- leading_parser "@[" >> sepBy1 attrInstance ", " >> "]"
def elabDeclAttrs [Monad m] [MonadEnv m] [MonadResolveName m] [MonadError m] [MonadMacroAdapter m] [MonadRecDepth m] [MonadTrace m] [MonadOptions m] [AddMessageContext m] [MonadLog m] [MonadInfoTree m] [MonadLiftT IO m] (stx : Syntax) : m (Array Attribute) :=
elabAttrs stx[1].getSepArgs
end Lean.Elab
|
de27d4155cf9f22f740d894768d9ee57ec8871f7 | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/ring_theory/ideals.lean | 19e5303a4ff6df608bde6cf51ebf4e445f565201 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,142 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.associated linear_algebra.basic order.zorn
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {a b : α}
open set function lattice
open_locale classical
namespace ideal
variables [comm_ring α] (I : ideal α)
@[ext] lemma ext {I J : ideal α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) : I = J :=
submodule.ext h
theorem eq_top_of_unit_mem
(x y : α) (hx : x ∈ I) (h : y * x = 1) : I = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ λ z _, calc
z = z * (y * x) : by simp [h]
... = (z * y) * x : eq.symm $ mul_assoc z y x
... ∈ I : I.mul_mem_left hx
theorem eq_top_of_is_unit_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ I) (h : is_unit x) : I = ⊤ :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := is_unit_iff_exists_inv'.1 h in eq_top_of_unit_mem I x y hx hy
theorem eq_top_iff_one : I = ⊤ ↔ (1:α) ∈ I :=
⟨by rintro rfl; trivial,
λ h, eq_top_of_unit_mem _ _ 1 h (by simp)⟩
theorem ne_top_iff_one : I ≠ ⊤ ↔ (1:α) ∉ I :=
not_congr I.eq_top_iff_one
def span (s : set α) : ideal α := submodule.span α s
lemma subset_span {s : set α} : s ⊆ span s := submodule.subset_span
lemma span_le {s : set α} {I} : span s ≤ I ↔ s ⊆ I := submodule.span_le
lemma span_mono {s t : set α} : s ⊆ t → span s ≤ span t := submodule.span_mono
@[simp] lemma span_eq : span (I : set α) = I := submodule.span_eq _
@[simp] lemma span_singleton_one : span ({1} : set α) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ subset_span $ mem_singleton _
lemma mem_span_insert {s : set α} {x y} :
x ∈ span (insert y s) ↔ ∃ a (z ∈ span s), x = a * y + z := submodule.mem_span_insert
lemma mem_span_insert' {s : set α} {x y} :
x ∈ span (insert y s) ↔ ∃a, x + a * y ∈ span s := submodule.mem_span_insert'
lemma mem_span_singleton' {x y : α} :
x ∈ span ({y} : set α) ↔ ∃ a, a * y = x := submodule.mem_span_singleton
lemma mem_span_singleton {x y : α} :
x ∈ span ({y} : set α) ↔ y ∣ x :=
mem_span_singleton'.trans $ exists_congr $ λ _, by rw [eq_comm, mul_comm]; refl
lemma span_singleton_le_span_singleton {x y : α} :
span ({x} : set α) ≤ span ({y} : set α) ↔ y ∣ x :=
span_le.trans $ singleton_subset_iff.trans mem_span_singleton
lemma span_eq_bot {s : set α} : span s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, (x:α) = 0 := submodule.span_eq_bot
lemma span_singleton_eq_bot {x} : span ({x} : set α) = ⊥ ↔ x = 0 := submodule.span_singleton_eq_bot
lemma span_singleton_eq_top {x} : span ({x} : set α) = ⊤ ↔ is_unit x :=
by rw [is_unit_iff_dvd_one, ← span_singleton_le_span_singleton, span_singleton_one, eq_top_iff]
@[class] def is_prime (I : ideal α) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ {x y : α}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I
theorem is_prime.mem_or_mem {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime) :
∀ {x y : α}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I := hI.2
theorem is_prime.mem_or_mem_of_mul_eq_zero {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime)
{x y : α} (h : x * y = 0) : x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I :=
hI.2 (h.symm ▸ I.zero_mem)
theorem is_prime.mem_of_pow_mem {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime)
{r : α} (n : ℕ) (H : r^n ∈ I) : r ∈ I :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ exact (mt (eq_top_iff_one _).2 hI.1).elim H },
exact or.cases_on (hI.mem_or_mem H) id ih
end
theorem zero_ne_one_of_proper {I : ideal α} (h : I ≠ ⊤) : (0:α) ≠ 1 :=
λ hz, I.ne_top_iff_one.1 h $ hz ▸ I.zero_mem
theorem span_singleton_prime {p : α} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
is_prime (span ({p} : set α)) ↔ prime p :=
by simp [is_prime, prime, span_singleton_eq_top, hp, mem_span_singleton]
@[class] def is_maximal (I : ideal α) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ J, I < J → J = ⊤
theorem is_maximal_iff {I : ideal α} : I.is_maximal ↔
(1:α) ∉ I ∧ ∀ (J : ideal α) x, I ≤ J → x ∉ I → x ∈ J → (1:α) ∈ J :=
and_congr I.ne_top_iff_one $ forall_congr $ λ J,
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le]; exact
⟨λ H x h hx₁ hx₂, J.eq_top_iff_one.1 $
H ⟨h, not_subset.2 ⟨_, hx₂, hx₁⟩⟩,
λ H ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, let ⟨x, xJ, xI⟩ := not_subset.1 h₂ in
J.eq_top_iff_one.2 $ H x h₁ xI xJ⟩
theorem is_maximal.eq_of_le {I J : ideal α}
(hI : I.is_maximal) (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) (IJ : I ≤ J) : I = J :=
eq_iff_le_not_lt.2 ⟨IJ, λ h, hJ (hI.2 _ h)⟩
theorem is_maximal.exists_inv {I : ideal α}
(hI : I.is_maximal) {x} (hx : x ∉ I) : ∃ y, y * x - 1 ∈ I :=
begin
cases is_maximal_iff.1 hI with H₁ H₂,
rcases mem_span_insert'.1 (H₂ (span (insert x I)) x
(set.subset.trans (subset_insert _ _) subset_span)
hx (subset_span (mem_insert _ _))) with ⟨y, hy⟩,
rw [span_eq, ← neg_mem_iff, add_comm, neg_add', neg_mul_eq_neg_mul] at hy,
exact ⟨-y, hy⟩
end
theorem is_maximal.is_prime {I : ideal α} (H : I.is_maximal) : I.is_prime :=
⟨H.1, λ x y hxy, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hx, begin
cases H.exists_inv hx with z hz,
have := I.mul_mem_left hz,
rw [mul_sub, mul_one, mul_comm, mul_assoc] at this,
exact I.neg_mem_iff.1 ((I.add_mem_iff_right $ I.mul_mem_left hxy).1 this)
end⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_maximal.is_prime' (I : ideal α) : ∀ [H : I.is_maximal], I.is_prime := is_maximal.is_prime
theorem exists_le_maximal (I : ideal α) (hI : I ≠ ⊤) :
∃ M : ideal α, M.is_maximal ∧ I ≤ M :=
begin
rcases zorn.zorn_partial_order₀ { J : ideal α | J ≠ ⊤ } _ I hI with ⟨M, M0, IM, h⟩,
{ refine ⟨M, ⟨M0, λ J hJ, by_contradiction $ λ J0, _⟩, IM⟩,
cases h J J0 (le_of_lt hJ), exact lt_irrefl _ hJ },
{ intros S SC cC I IS,
refine ⟨Sup S, λ H, _, λ _, le_Sup⟩,
rcases submodule.mem_Sup_of_directed ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 H) I IS cC.directed_on with ⟨J, JS, J0⟩,
exact SC JS ((eq_top_iff_one _).2 J0) }
end
def is_coprime (x y : α) : Prop :=
span ({x, y} : set α) = ⊤
theorem mem_span_pair {x y z : α} :
z ∈ span (insert y {x} : set α) ↔ ∃ a b, a * x + b * y = z :=
begin
simp only [mem_span_insert, mem_span_singleton', exists_prop],
split,
{ rintros ⟨a, b, ⟨c, hc⟩, h⟩,
exact ⟨c, a, by simp [h, hc]⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨b, c, e⟩, exact ⟨c, b * x, ⟨b, rfl⟩, by simp [e.symm]⟩ }
end
theorem is_coprime_def {x y : α} :
is_coprime x y ↔ ∀ z, ∃ a b, a * x + b * y = z :=
by simp [is_coprime, submodule.eq_top_iff', mem_span_pair]
theorem is_coprime_self {x : α} :
is_coprime x x ↔ is_unit x :=
by rw [← span_singleton_eq_top]; simp [is_coprime]
lemma span_singleton_lt_span_singleton [integral_domain β] {x y : β} :
span ({x} : set β) < span ({y} : set β) ↔ y ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ d : β, ¬ is_unit d ∧ x = y * d :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, span_singleton_le_span_singleton, span_singleton_le_span_singleton,
dvd_and_not_dvd_iff]
def quotient (I : ideal α) := I.quotient
namespace quotient
variables {I} {x y : α}
def mk (I : ideal α) (a : α) : I.quotient := submodule.quotient.mk a
protected theorem eq : mk I x = mk I y ↔ x - y ∈ I := submodule.quotient.eq I
instance (I : ideal α) : has_one I.quotient := ⟨mk I 1⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_one (I : ideal α) : mk I 1 = 1 := rfl
instance (I : ideal α) : has_mul I.quotient :=
⟨λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂' a b (λ a b, mk I (a * b)) $
λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ h₁ h₂, quot.sound $ begin
refine calc a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂ = a₂ * (a₁ - b₁) + (a₂ - b₂) * b₁ : _
... ∈ I : I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left h₁) (I.mul_mem_right h₂),
rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel, mul_comm, mul_comm b₁]
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_mul : mk I (x * y) = mk I x * mk I y := rfl
instance (I : ideal α) : comm_ring I.quotient :=
{ mul := (*),
one := 1,
mul_assoc := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg (mk _) (mul_assoc a b c),
mul_comm := λ a b, quotient.induction_on₂' a b $
λ a b, congr_arg (mk _) (mul_comm a b),
one_mul := λ a, quotient.induction_on' a $
λ a, congr_arg (mk _) (one_mul a),
mul_one := λ a, quotient.induction_on' a $
λ a, congr_arg (mk _) (mul_one a),
left_distrib := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg (mk _) (left_distrib a b c),
right_distrib := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg (mk _) (right_distrib a b c),
..submodule.quotient.add_comm_group I }
instance is_ring_hom_mk (I : ideal α) : is_ring_hom (mk I) :=
⟨rfl, λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
def map_mk (I J : ideal α) : ideal I.quotient :=
{ carrier := mk I '' J,
zero := ⟨0, J.zero_mem, rfl⟩,
add := by rintro _ _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨x + y, J.add_mem hx hy, rfl⟩,
smul := by rintro ⟨c⟩ _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨c * x, J.mul_mem_left hx, rfl⟩ }
@[simp] lemma mk_zero (I : ideal α) : mk I 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_add (I : ideal α) (a b : α) : mk I (a + b) = mk I a + mk I b := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_neg (I : ideal α) (a : α) : mk I (-a : α) = -mk I a := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_sub (I : ideal α) (a b : α) : mk I (a - b : α) = mk I a - mk I b := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_pow (I : ideal α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) : mk I (a ^ n : α) = mk I a ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [*, pow_succ]
lemma eq_zero_iff_mem {I : ideal α} : mk I a = 0 ↔ a ∈ I :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw ← sub_zero a }; exact quotient.eq'
theorem zero_eq_one_iff {I : ideal α} : (0 : I.quotient) = 1 ↔ I = ⊤ :=
eq_comm.trans $ eq_zero_iff_mem.trans (eq_top_iff_one _).symm
theorem zero_ne_one_iff {I : ideal α} : (0 : I.quotient) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ ⊤ :=
not_congr zero_eq_one_iff
protected def nonzero_comm_ring {I : ideal α} (hI : I ≠ ⊤) : nonzero_comm_ring I.quotient :=
{ zero_ne_one := zero_ne_one_iff.2 hI, ..quotient.comm_ring I }
instance (I : ideal α) [hI : I.is_prime] : integral_domain I.quotient :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ a b,
quotient.induction_on₂' a b $ λ a b hab,
(hI.mem_or_mem (eq_zero_iff_mem.1 hab)).elim
(or.inl ∘ eq_zero_iff_mem.2)
(or.inr ∘ eq_zero_iff_mem.2),
..quotient.nonzero_comm_ring hI.1 }
lemma exists_inv {I : ideal α} [hI : I.is_maximal] :
∀ {a : I.quotient}, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b : I.quotient, a * b = 1 :=
begin
rintro ⟨a⟩ h,
cases hI.exists_inv (mt eq_zero_iff_mem.2 h) with b hb,
rw [mul_comm] at hb,
exact ⟨mk _ b, quot.sound hb⟩
end
/-- quotient by maximal ideal is a field. def rather than instance, since users will have
computable inverses in some applications -/
protected noncomputable def field (I : ideal α) [hI : I.is_maximal] : discrete_field I.quotient :=
{ inv := λ a, if ha : a = 0 then 0 else classical.some (exists_inv ha),
mul_inv_cancel := λ a (ha : a ≠ 0), show a * dite _ _ _ = _,
by rw dif_neg ha;
exact classical.some_spec (exists_inv ha),
inv_mul_cancel := λ a (ha : a ≠ 0), show dite _ _ _ * a = _,
by rw [mul_comm, dif_neg ha];
exact classical.some_spec (exists_inv ha),
inv_zero := dif_pos rfl,
has_decidable_eq := classical.dec_eq _,
..quotient.integral_domain I }
variable [comm_ring β]
def lift (S : ideal α) (f : α → β) [is_ring_hom f] (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ S → f a = 0) :
quotient S → β :=
λ x, quotient.lift_on' x f $ λ (a b) (h : _ ∈ _),
eq_of_sub_eq_zero (by simpa only [is_ring_hom.map_sub f] using H _ h)
variables {S : ideal α} {f : α → β} [is_ring_hom f] {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ S → f a = 0}
@[simp] lemma lift_mk : lift S f H (mk S a) = f a := rfl
instance : is_ring_hom (lift S f H) :=
{ map_one := by show lift S f H (mk S 1) = 1; simp [is_ring_hom.map_one f, - mk_one],
map_add := λ a₁ a₂, quotient.induction_on₂' a₁ a₂ $ λ a₁ a₂, begin
show lift S f H (mk S a₁ + mk S a₂) = lift S f H (mk S a₁) + lift S f H (mk S a₂),
have := ideal.quotient.is_ring_hom_mk S,
rw ← this.map_add,
show lift S f H (mk S (a₁ + a₂)) = lift S f H (mk S a₁) + lift S f H (mk S a₂),
simp only [lift_mk, is_ring_hom.map_add f],
end,
map_mul := λ a₁ a₂, quotient.induction_on₂' a₁ a₂ $ λ a₁ a₂, begin
show lift S f H (mk S a₁ * mk S a₂) = lift S f H (mk S a₁) * lift S f H (mk S a₂),
have := ideal.quotient.is_ring_hom_mk S,
rw ← this.map_mul,
show lift S f H (mk S (a₁ * a₂)) = lift S f H (mk S a₁) * lift S f H (mk S a₂),
simp only [lift_mk, is_ring_hom.map_mul f],
end }
end quotient
lemma eq_bot_or_top {K : Type u} [discrete_field K] (I : ideal K) :
I = ⊥ ∨ I = ⊤ :=
begin
rw classical.or_iff_not_imp_right,
change _ ≠ _ → _,
rw ideal.ne_top_iff_one,
intro h1,
rw eq_bot_iff,
intros r hr,
by_cases H : r = 0, {simpa},
simpa [H, h1] using submodule.smul_mem I r⁻¹ hr,
end
lemma eq_bot_of_prime {K : Type u} [discrete_field K] (I : ideal K) [h : I.is_prime] :
I = ⊥ :=
classical.or_iff_not_imp_right.mp I.eq_bot_or_top h.1
end ideal
def nonunits (α : Type u) [monoid α] : set α := { a | ¬is_unit a }
@[simp] theorem mem_nonunits_iff [comm_monoid α] : a ∈ nonunits α ↔ ¬ is_unit a := iff.rfl
theorem mul_mem_nonunits_right [comm_monoid α] :
b ∈ nonunits α → a * b ∈ nonunits α :=
mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_right
theorem mul_mem_nonunits_left [comm_monoid α] :
a ∈ nonunits α → a * b ∈ nonunits α :=
mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left
theorem zero_mem_nonunits [semiring α] : 0 ∈ nonunits α ↔ (0:α) ≠ 1 :=
not_congr is_unit_zero_iff
@[simp] theorem one_not_mem_nonunits [monoid α] : (1:α) ∉ nonunits α :=
not_not_intro is_unit_one
theorem coe_subset_nonunits [comm_ring α] {I : ideal α} (h : I ≠ ⊤) :
(I : set α) ⊆ nonunits α :=
λ x hx hu, h $ I.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem hx hu
lemma exists_max_ideal_of_mem_nonunits [comm_ring α] (h : a ∈ nonunits α) :
∃ I : ideal α, I.is_maximal ∧ a ∈ I :=
begin
have : ideal.span ({a} : set α) ≠ ⊤,
{ intro H, rw ideal.span_singleton_eq_top at H, contradiction },
rcases ideal.exists_le_maximal _ this with ⟨I, Imax, H⟩,
use [I, Imax], apply H, apply ideal.subset_span, exact set.mem_singleton a
end
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
class local_ring (α : Type u) extends nonzero_comm_ring α :=
(is_local : ∀ (a : α), (is_unit a) ∨ (is_unit (1 - a)))
end prio
namespace local_ring
variable [local_ring α]
lemma is_unit_or_is_unit_one_sub_self (a : α) :
(is_unit a) ∨ (is_unit (1 - a)) :=
is_local a
lemma is_unit_of_mem_nonunits_one_sub_self (a : α) (h : (1 - a) ∈ nonunits α) :
is_unit a :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.1 (is_local a) h
lemma is_unit_one_sub_self_of_mem_nonunits (a : α) (h : a ∈ nonunits α) :
is_unit (1 - a) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.1 (is_local a) h
lemma nonunits_add {x y} (hx : x ∈ nonunits α) (hy : y ∈ nonunits α) :
x + y ∈ nonunits α :=
begin
rintros ⟨u, hu⟩,
apply hy,
suffices : is_unit ((↑u⁻¹ : α) * y),
{ rcases this with ⟨s, hs⟩,
use u * s,
convert congr_arg (λ z, (u : α) * z) hs,
rw ← mul_assoc, simp },
rw show (↑u⁻¹ * y) = (1 - ↑u⁻¹ * x),
{ rw eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
replace hu := congr_arg (λ z, (↑u⁻¹ : α) * z) hu,
simpa [mul_add] using hu },
apply is_unit_one_sub_self_of_mem_nonunits,
exact mul_mem_nonunits_right hx
end
variable (α)
def nonunits_ideal : ideal α :=
{ carrier := nonunits α,
zero := zero_mem_nonunits.2 $ zero_ne_one,
add := λ x y hx hy, nonunits_add hx hy,
smul := λ a x, mul_mem_nonunits_right }
instance nonunits_ideal.is_maximal : (nonunits_ideal α).is_maximal :=
begin
rw ideal.is_maximal_iff,
split,
{ intro h, apply h, exact is_unit_one },
{ intros I x hI hx H,
erw not_not at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨u,rfl⟩,
simpa using I.smul_mem ↑u⁻¹ H }
end
lemma max_ideal_unique :
∃! I : ideal α, I.is_maximal :=
⟨nonunits_ideal α, nonunits_ideal.is_maximal α,
λ I hI, hI.eq_of_le (nonunits_ideal.is_maximal α).1 $
λ x hx, hI.1 ∘ I.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem hx⟩
variable {α}
@[simp] lemma mem_nonunits_ideal (x) :
x ∈ nonunits_ideal α ↔ x ∈ nonunits α := iff.rfl
end local_ring
def is_local_ring (α : Type u) [comm_ring α] : Prop :=
((0:α) ≠ 1) ∧ ∀ (a : α), (is_unit a) ∨ (is_unit (1 - a))
def local_of_is_local_ring [comm_ring α] (h : is_local_ring α) : local_ring α :=
{ zero_ne_one := h.1,
is_local := h.2,
.. ‹comm_ring α› }
def local_of_unit_or_unit_one_sub [comm_ring α] (hnze : (0:α) ≠ 1)
(h : ∀ x : α, is_unit x ∨ is_unit (1 - x)) : local_ring α :=
local_of_is_local_ring ⟨hnze, h⟩
def local_of_nonunits_ideal [comm_ring α] (hnze : (0:α) ≠ 1)
(h : ∀ x y ∈ nonunits α, x + y ∈ nonunits α) : local_ring α :=
local_of_is_local_ring ⟨hnze,
λ x, or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr $ λ hx,
begin
by_contra H,
apply h _ _ hx H,
simp [-sub_eq_add_neg, add_sub_cancel'_right]
end⟩
def local_of_unique_max_ideal [comm_ring α] (h : ∃! I : ideal α, I.is_maximal) :
local_ring α :=
local_of_nonunits_ideal
(let ⟨I, Imax, _⟩ := h in (λ (H : 0 = 1), Imax.1 $ I.eq_top_iff_one.2 $ H ▸ I.zero_mem))
$ λ x y hx hy H,
let ⟨I, Imax, Iuniq⟩ := h in
let ⟨Ix, Ixmax, Hx⟩ := exists_max_ideal_of_mem_nonunits hx in
let ⟨Iy, Iymax, Hy⟩ := exists_max_ideal_of_mem_nonunits hy in
have xmemI : x ∈ I, from ((Iuniq Ix Ixmax) ▸ Hx),
have ymemI : y ∈ I, from ((Iuniq Iy Iymax) ▸ Hy),
Imax.1 $ I.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem (I.add_mem xmemI ymemI) H
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
class is_local_ring_hom [comm_ring α] [comm_ring β] (f : α → β) extends is_ring_hom f : Prop :=
(map_nonunit : ∀ a, is_unit (f a) → is_unit a)
end prio
@[simp] lemma is_unit_of_map_unit [comm_ring α] [comm_ring β] (f : α → β) [is_local_ring_hom f]
(a) (h : is_unit (f a)) : is_unit a :=
is_local_ring_hom.map_nonunit a h
section
open local_ring
variables [local_ring α] [local_ring β]
variables (f : α → β) [is_local_ring_hom f]
lemma map_nonunit (a) (h : a ∈ nonunits_ideal α) : f a ∈ nonunits_ideal β :=
λ H, h $ is_unit_of_map_unit f a H
end
namespace local_ring
variables [local_ring α] [local_ring β]
variable (α)
def residue_field := (nonunits_ideal α).quotient
namespace residue_field
noncomputable instance : discrete_field (residue_field α) :=
ideal.quotient.field (nonunits_ideal α)
variables {α β}
noncomputable def map (f : α → β) [is_local_ring_hom f] :
residue_field α → residue_field β :=
ideal.quotient.lift (nonunits_ideal α) (ideal.quotient.mk _ ∘ f) $
λ a ha,
begin
erw ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem,
exact map_nonunit f a ha
end
instance map.is_ring_hom (f : α → β) [is_local_ring_hom f] :
is_ring_hom (map f) :=
ideal.quotient.is_ring_hom
end residue_field
end local_ring
namespace discrete_field
variables [discrete_field α]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance : local_ring α :=
{ is_local := λ a,
if h : a = 0
then or.inr (by rw [h, sub_zero]; exact is_unit_one)
else or.inl $ is_unit_of_mul_one a a⁻¹ $ div_self h }
end discrete_field
|
e6fb4c26dff5d0c14933355eae22da6c1650dcfe | 19cc34575500ee2e3d4586c15544632aa07a8e66 | /src/logic/nontrivial.lean | d02f9d86714d72ca95682d37ed48a779bb2758ac | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | LibertasSpZ/mathlib | b9fcd46625eb940611adb5e719a4b554138dade6 | 33f7870a49d7cc06d2f3036e22543e6ec5046e68 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,066,539,347 | 1,602,429,158,000 | 1,602,429,158,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,972 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import logic.unique
import logic.function.basic
/-!
# Nontrivial types
A type is *nontrivial* if it contains at least two elements. This is useful in particular for rings
(where it is equivalent to the fact that zero is different from one) and for vector spaces
(where it is equivalent to the fact that the dimension is positive).
We introduce a typeclass `nontrivial` formalizing this property.
-/
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
open_locale classical
/-- Predicate typeclass for expressing that a type is not reduced to a single element. In rings,
this is equivalent to `0 ≠ 1`. In vector spaces, this is equivalent to positive dimension. -/
class nontrivial (α : Type*) : Prop :=
(exists_pair_ne : ∃ (x y : α), x ≠ y)
lemma nontrivial_iff : nontrivial α ↔ ∃ (x y : α), x ≠ y :=
⟨λ h, h.exists_pair_ne, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma exists_pair_ne (α : Type*) [nontrivial α] : ∃ (x y : α), x ≠ y :=
nontrivial.exists_pair_ne
lemma exists_ne [nontrivial α] (x : α) : ∃ y, y ≠ x :=
begin
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨y, y', h⟩,
by_cases hx : x = y,
{ rw ← hx at h,
exact ⟨y', h.symm⟩ },
{ exact ⟨y, ne.symm hx⟩ }
end
-- `x` and `y` are explicit here, as they are often needed to guide typechecking of `h`.
lemma nontrivial_of_ne (x y : α) (h : x ≠ y) : nontrivial α :=
⟨⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
-- `x` and `y` are explicit here, as they are often needed to guide typechecking of `h`.
lemma nontrivial_of_lt [preorder α] (x y : α) (h : x < y) : nontrivial α :=
⟨⟨x, y, ne_of_lt h⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance nontrivial.to_nonempty [nontrivial α] : nonempty α :=
let ⟨x, _⟩ := exists_pair_ne α in ⟨x⟩
/-- An inhabited type is either nontrivial, or has a unique element. -/
noncomputable def nontrivial_psum_unique (α : Type*) [inhabited α] :
psum (nontrivial α) (unique α) :=
if h : nontrivial α then psum.inl h else psum.inr
{ default := default α,
uniq := λ (x : α),
begin
change x = default α,
contrapose! h,
use [x, default α]
end }
lemma subsingleton_iff : subsingleton α ↔ ∀ (x y : α), x = y :=
⟨by { introsI h, exact subsingleton.elim }, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton : ¬(nontrivial α) ↔ subsingleton α :=
by { rw [nontrivial_iff, subsingleton_iff], push_neg, refl }
/-- A type is either a subsingleton or nontrivial. -/
lemma subsingleton_or_nontrivial (α : Type*) : subsingleton α ∨ nontrivial α :=
by { rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, or_comm], exact classical.em _ }
lemma false_of_nontrivial_of_subsingleton (α : Type*) [nontrivial α] [subsingleton α] : false :=
let ⟨x, y, h⟩ := exists_pair_ne α in h $ subsingleton.elim x y
instance nontrivial_prod_left [nontrivial α] [nonempty β] : nontrivial (α × β) :=
begin
inhabit β,
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨x, y, h⟩,
use [(x, default β), (y, default β)],
contrapose! h,
exact congr_arg prod.fst h
end
instance nontrivial_prod_right [nontrivial α] [nonempty β] : nontrivial (β × α) :=
begin
inhabit β,
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨x, y, h⟩,
use [(default β, x), (default β, y)],
contrapose! h,
exact congr_arg prod.snd h
end
instance option.nontrivial [nonempty α] : nontrivial (option α) :=
by { inhabit α, use [none, some (default α)] }
instance function.nontrivial [nonempty α] [nontrivial β] : nontrivial (α → β) :=
begin
rcases exists_pair_ne β with ⟨x, y, h⟩,
use [λ _, x, λ _, y],
contrapose! h,
inhabit α,
exact congr_fun h (default α)
end
/-- Pushforward a `nontrivial` instance along an injective function. -/
protected lemma function.injective.nontrivial [nontrivial α]
{f : α → β} (hf : function.injective f) : nontrivial β :=
let ⟨x, y, h⟩ := exists_pair_ne α in ⟨⟨f x, f y, hf.ne h⟩⟩
/-- Pullback a `nontrivial` instance along a surjective function. -/
protected lemma function.surjective.nontrivial [nontrivial β]
{f : α → β} (hf : function.surjective f) : nontrivial α :=
begin
rcases exists_pair_ne β with ⟨x, y, h⟩,
rcases hf x with ⟨x', hx'⟩,
rcases hf y with ⟨y', hy'⟩,
have : x' ≠ y', by { contrapose! h, rw [← hx', ← hy', h] },
exact ⟨⟨x', y', this⟩⟩
end
/-- An injective function from a nontrivial type has an argument at
which it does not take a given value. -/
protected lemma function.injective.exists_ne [nontrivial α] {f : α → β}
(hf : function.injective f) (y : β) : ∃ x, f x ≠ y :=
begin
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨x₁, x₂, hx⟩,
by_cases h : f x₂ = y,
{ exact ⟨x₁, (hf.ne_iff' h).2 hx⟩ },
{ exact ⟨x₂, h⟩ }
end
namespace tactic
/--
Tries to generate a `nontrivial α` instance by performing case analysis on
`subsingleton_or_nontrivial α`,
attempting to discharge the subsingleton branch using `le_of_eq` and `subsingleton.elim`.
-/
meta def nontriviality_by_elim (α : expr) : tactic unit :=
do
alternative ← to_expr ``(subsingleton_or_nontrivial %%α),
n ← get_unused_name "_inst",
tactic.cases alternative [n, n],
`[{ resetI, try { apply le_of_eq }, apply subsingleton.elim, }] <|>
fail format!"Could not prove goal assuming `subsingleton {α}`",
reset_instance_cache
/--
Tries to generate a `nontrivial α` instance using `nontrivial_of_ne` or `nontrivial_of_lt`
and local hypotheses.
-/
meta def nontriviality_by_assumption (α : expr) : tactic unit :=
do
n ← get_unused_name "_inst",
to_expr ``(nontrivial %%α) >>= assert n,
apply_instance <|> `[solve_by_elim [nontrivial_of_ne, nontrivial_of_lt]],
reset_instance_cache
end tactic
namespace tactic.interactive
open tactic
setup_tactic_parser
/--
Attempts to generate a `nontrivial α` hypothesis.
The tactic first looks for an instance using `apply_instance`.
If the goal is an (in)equality, the type `α` is inferred from the goal.
Otherwise, the type needs to be specified in the tactic invocation, as `nontriviality α`.
The `nontriviality` tactic will first look for strict inequalities amongst the hypotheses,
and use these to derive the `nontrivial` instance directly.
Otherwise, it will perform a case split on `subsingleton α ∨ nontrivial α`,
and attempt to discharge the `subsingleton` goal.
```
example {R : Type} [ordered_ring R] {a : R} (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a :=
begin
nontriviality, -- There is now a `nontrivial R` hypothesis available.
assumption,
end
```
```
example {R : Type} [comm_ring R] {r s : R} : r * s = s * r :=
begin
nontriviality, -- There is now a `nontrivial R` hypothesis available.
apply mul_comm,
end
```
```
example {R : Type} [ordered_ring R] {a : R} (h : 0 < a) : (2 : ℕ) ∣ 4 :=
begin
nontriviality R, -- there is now a `nontrivial R` hypothesis available.
dec_trivial
end
```
-/
meta def nontriviality (t : parse parser.pexpr?) : tactic unit :=
do
α ← match t with
| some α := to_expr α
| none :=
(do t ← mk_mvar, e ← to_expr ``(@eq %%t _ _), target >>= unify e, return t) <|>
(do t ← mk_mvar, e ← to_expr ``(@has_le.le %%t _ _ _), target >>= unify e, return t) <|>
(do t ← mk_mvar, e ← to_expr ``(@ne %%t _ _), target >>= unify e, return t) <|>
(do t ← mk_mvar, e ← to_expr ``(@has_lt.lt %%t _ _ _), target >>= unify e, return t) <|>
fail "The goal is not an (in)equality, so you'll need to specify the desired `nontrivial α`
instance by invoking `nontriviality α`."
end,
nontriviality_by_assumption α <|> nontriviality_by_elim α
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "nontriviality",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.nontriviality],
tags := ["logic", "typeclass"] }
end tactic.interactive
|
5c156a194017f458e99f3121049917ddb17a9287 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/control/traversable/instances.lean | 97fe4a08bf51e028460902588d0bceb1bf806035 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,469 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import control.applicative
import data.list.forall2
import data.set.functor
/-!
# Traversable instances
This file provides instances of `traversable` for types from the core library: `option`, `list` and
`sum`.
-/
universes u v
section option
open functor
variables {F G : Type u → Type u}
variables [applicative F] [applicative G]
variables [is_lawful_applicative F] [is_lawful_applicative G]
lemma option.id_traverse {α} (x : option α) : option.traverse id.mk x = x :=
by cases x; refl
@[nolint unused_arguments]
lemma option.comp_traverse {α β γ} (f : β → F γ) (g : α → G β) (x : option α) :
option.traverse (comp.mk ∘ (<$>) f ∘ g) x =
comp.mk (option.traverse f <$> option.traverse g x) :=
by cases x; simp! with functor_norm; refl
lemma option.traverse_eq_map_id {α β} (f : α → β) (x : option α) :
traverse (id.mk ∘ f) x = id.mk (f <$> x) :=
by cases x; refl
variable (η : applicative_transformation F G)
lemma option.naturality {α β} (f : α → F β) (x : option α) :
η (option.traverse f x) = option.traverse (@η _ ∘ f) x :=
by cases x with x; simp! [*] with functor_norm
end option
instance : is_lawful_traversable option :=
{ id_traverse := @option.id_traverse,
comp_traverse := @option.comp_traverse,
traverse_eq_map_id := @option.traverse_eq_map_id,
naturality := @option.naturality,
.. option.is_lawful_monad }
namespace list
variables {F G : Type u → Type u}
variables [applicative F] [applicative G]
section
variables [is_lawful_applicative F] [is_lawful_applicative G]
open applicative functor list
protected lemma id_traverse {α} (xs : list α) :
list.traverse id.mk xs = xs :=
by induction xs; simp! * with functor_norm; refl
@[nolint unused_arguments]
protected lemma comp_traverse {α β γ} (f : β → F γ) (g : α → G β) (x : list α) :
list.traverse (comp.mk ∘ (<$>) f ∘ g) x =
comp.mk (list.traverse f <$> list.traverse g x) :=
by induction x; simp! * with functor_norm; refl
protected lemma traverse_eq_map_id {α β} (f : α → β) (x : list α) :
list.traverse (id.mk ∘ f) x = id.mk (f <$> x) :=
by induction x; simp! * with functor_norm; refl
variable (η : applicative_transformation F G)
protected lemma naturality {α β} (f : α → F β) (x : list α) :
η (list.traverse f x) = list.traverse (@η _ ∘ f) x :=
by induction x; simp! * with functor_norm
open nat
instance : is_lawful_traversable.{u} list :=
{ id_traverse := @list.id_traverse,
comp_traverse := @list.comp_traverse,
traverse_eq_map_id := @list.traverse_eq_map_id,
naturality := @list.naturality,
.. list.is_lawful_monad }
end
section traverse
variables {α' β' : Type u} (f : α' → F β')
@[simp] lemma traverse_nil : traverse f ([] : list α') = (pure [] : F (list β')) := rfl
@[simp] lemma traverse_cons (a : α') (l : list α') :
traverse f (a :: l) = (::) <$> f a <*> traverse f l := rfl
variables [is_lawful_applicative F]
@[simp] lemma traverse_append :
∀ (as bs : list α'), traverse f (as ++ bs) = (++) <$> traverse f as <*> traverse f bs
| [] bs :=
have has_append.append ([] : list β') = id, by funext; refl,
by simp [this] with functor_norm
| (a :: as) bs := by simp [traverse_append as bs] with functor_norm; congr
lemma mem_traverse {f : α' → set β'} :
∀(l : list α') (n : list β'), n ∈ traverse f l ↔ forall₂ (λb a, b ∈ f a) n l
| [] [] := by simp
| (a::as) [] := by simp
| [] (b::bs) := by simp
| (a::as) (b::bs) := by simp [mem_traverse as bs]
end traverse
end list
namespace sum
section traverse
variables {σ : Type u}
variables {F G : Type u → Type u}
variables [applicative F] [applicative G]
open applicative functor
open list (cons)
protected lemma traverse_map {α β γ : Type u} (g : α → β) (f : β → G γ) (x : σ ⊕ α) :
sum.traverse f (g <$> x) = sum.traverse (f ∘ g) x :=
by cases x; simp [sum.traverse, id_map] with functor_norm; refl
variables [is_lawful_applicative F] [is_lawful_applicative G]
protected lemma id_traverse {σ α} (x : σ ⊕ α) : sum.traverse id.mk x = x :=
by cases x; refl
@[nolint unused_arguments]
protected lemma comp_traverse {α β γ} (f : β → F γ) (g : α → G β) (x : σ ⊕ α) :
sum.traverse (comp.mk ∘ (<$>) f ∘ g) x =
comp.mk (sum.traverse f <$> sum.traverse g x) :=
by cases x; simp! [sum.traverse,map_id] with functor_norm; refl
protected lemma traverse_eq_map_id {α β} (f : α → β) (x : σ ⊕ α) :
sum.traverse (id.mk ∘ f) x = id.mk (f <$> x) :=
by induction x; simp! * with functor_norm; refl
protected lemma map_traverse {α β γ} (g : α → G β) (f : β → γ) (x : σ ⊕ α) :
(<$>) f <$> sum.traverse g x = sum.traverse ((<$>) f ∘ g) x :=
by cases x; simp [sum.traverse, id_map] with functor_norm; congr; refl
variable (η : applicative_transformation F G)
protected lemma naturality {α β} (f : α → F β) (x : σ ⊕ α) :
η (sum.traverse f x) = sum.traverse (@η _ ∘ f) x :=
by cases x; simp! [sum.traverse] with functor_norm
end traverse
instance {σ : Type u} : is_lawful_traversable.{u} (sum σ) :=
{ id_traverse := @sum.id_traverse σ,
comp_traverse := @sum.comp_traverse σ,
traverse_eq_map_id := @sum.traverse_eq_map_id σ,
naturality := @sum.naturality σ,
.. sum.is_lawful_monad }
end sum
|
261a269a70ab6c835a00974e9b35e4f3efe6570a | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/eqThmWithMoreThanOneAsPattern.lean | d3103c9722694c32e83b7573c50867444dd98639 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 97 | lean | @[simp] def foo: Nat → Nat → Nat
| p1@(t₁ + 1), p2@(t₂ + 1) => foo t₁ t₂
| _, _ => 0
|
4028af75f42cc24af48267ac7dc87350da97e634 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/cmd_meta_errors.lean | 4b381c5873f26108a21b8ec29fec81b68b34533a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 242 | lean | /-- docs -/
run_cmd
@[class]
run_cmd
private run_cmd
meta axiom
private protected def f := 42
private private def f := 42
private inductive
protected inductive
noncomputable inductive
private instance
protected instance
mutual instance
|
41948badb7b1067b1ca0000c5affb9b2aa6b4b3a | 8c02fed42525b65813b55c064afe2484758d6d09 | /src/ops.lean | 78bfe08243ddcd104cc74304bc7c0cb28eddb06b | [
"LicenseRef-scancode-generic-cla",
"MIT"
] | permissive | microsoft/AliveInLean | 3eac351a34154efedd3ffc4fe2fa4ec01b219e0d | 4b739dd6e4266b26a045613849df221374119871 | refs/heads/master | 1,691,419,737,939 | 1,689,365,567,000 | 1,689,365,568,000 | 131,156,103 | 23 | 18 | NOASSERTION | 1,660,342,040,000 | 1,524,747,538,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,678 | lean | -- Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-- Licensed under the MIT license.
import .common
universes u v
class has_udiv (α : Type u) := (udiv : α → α → α)
class has_umod (α : Type u) := (umod : α → α → α)
class has_and (α : Type u) := (and : α → α → α)
class has_or (α : Type u) := (or : α → α → α)
class has_xor (α : Type u) := (xor : α → α → α)
class has_shl (α : Type u) := (shl : α → α → α)
class has_lshr (α : Type u) := (lshr : α → α → α)
class has_ashr (α : Type u) := (ashr : α → α → α)
class has_not (α : Type u) := (not : α → α)
infix `/u`:70 := has_udiv.udiv
infix `%u`:70 := has_umod.umod
infix `&`:70 := has_and.and
infix `|b`:70 := has_or.or
infix `^b`:70 := has_xor.xor
infix `<<`:70 := has_shl.shl
infix `>>l`:70 := has_lshr.lshr
infix `>>a`:70 := has_ashr.ashr
prefix `~` := has_not.not
class has_eq (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (eq : α → α → β)
class has_ne (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (ne : α → α → β)
class has_slt (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (slt : α → α → β)
class has_sle (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (sle : α → α → β)
class has_ult (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (ult : α → α → β)
class has_ule (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (ule : α → α → β)
class has_sgt (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (sgt : α → α → β)
class has_sge (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (sge : α → α → β)
class has_ugt (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (ugt : α → α → β)
class has_uge (β: Type v) (α: Type u) := (uge : α → α → β)
notation a `=_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_eq.eq ty a b
notation a `≠_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_ne.ne ty a b
notation a `<_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_slt.slt ty a b
notation a `≤_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_sle.sle ty a b
notation a `>_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_sgt.sgt ty a b
notation a `≥_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_sge.sge ty a b
notation a `<u_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_ult.ult ty a b
notation a `≤u_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_ule.ule ty a b
notation a `>u_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_ugt.ugt ty a b
notation a `≥u_{` ty `}` b : 50 := has_uge.uge ty a b
class bool_like (α: Type u) :=
(tt ff:α)
(and or xor:α → α → α)
(not:α → α)
instance bool_like_has_and (α : Type u) [s:bool_like α]
: has_and α := ⟨s.and⟩
instance bool_like_has_or (α : Type u) [s:bool_like α]
: has_or α := ⟨s.or⟩
instance bool_like_has_xor (α : Type u) [s:bool_like α]
: has_xor α := ⟨s.xor⟩
instance bool_like_has_not (α : Type u) [s:bool_like α]
: has_not α := ⟨s.not⟩
instance bool_is_bool_like : bool_like bool :=
⟨tt, ff, band, bor, bxor, bnot⟩
class uint_like (α: Π (v:size), Type v) :=
(add sub mul udiv urem sdiv srem and or xor shl lshr ashr:
Π {sz:size}, α sz → α sz → α sz)
(zero {} :Π (sz:size), α sz)
(allone {} :Π (sz:size), α sz)
(signonly {} :Π (sz:size), α sz)
(from_z {} :Π (sz:size) (z:ℤ), α sz)
(zext sext:Π (sz1 sz2:size), α sz1 → α sz2)
(trunc:Π (sz1 sz2:size), α sz1 → α sz2)
instance uint_like_has_add (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_add (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.add⟩
instance uint_like_has_sub (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_sub (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.sub⟩
instance uint_like_has_mul (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_mul (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.mul⟩
instance uint_like_has_udiv (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_udiv (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.udiv⟩
instance uint_like_has_urem (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_umod (α sz) :=
⟨uint_like.urem⟩ -- Even if rem and mod are different, we define this way
-- because this helps us use '%u' operator
instance uint_like_has_sdiv (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_div (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.sdiv⟩
instance uint_like_has_srem (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_mod (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.srem⟩
instance uint_like_has_and (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_and (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.and⟩
instance uint_like_has_or (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_or (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.or⟩
instance uint_like_has_xor (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_xor (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.xor⟩
instance uint_like_has_shl (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_shl (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.shl⟩
instance uint_like_has_lshr (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_lshr (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.lshr⟩
instance uint_like_has_ashr (α:Π (v:size), Type v) [s:uint_like α] {sz:size}
: has_ashr (α sz) := ⟨uint_like.ashr⟩
class has_ite (α :Type v) (β:Type u) :=
(ite:α → β → β → β)
@[reducible]
instance bool_has_ite (β:Type u) : has_ite bool β :=
⟨cond⟩
class has_comp (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) :=
(eq ne sle slt ule ult:Π {sz:size}, α sz → α sz → β)
instance has_comp_has_eq (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_eq β (α sz) := ⟨@has_comp.eq α β s sz⟩
instance has_comp_has_ne (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_ne β (α sz) := ⟨@has_comp.ne α β s sz⟩
instance has_comp_has_slt (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_slt β (α sz) := ⟨@has_comp.slt α β s sz⟩
instance has_comp_has_sle (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_sle β (α sz) := ⟨@has_comp.sle α β s sz⟩
instance has_comp_has_sgt (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_sgt β (α sz) := ⟨λ x y, has_comp.slt β y x⟩
instance has_comp_has_sge (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_sge β (α sz) := ⟨λ x y, has_comp.sle β y x⟩
instance has_comp_has_ult (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_ult β (α sz) := ⟨@has_comp.ult α β s sz⟩
instance has_comp_has_ule (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_ule β (α sz) := ⟨@has_comp.ule α β s sz⟩
instance has_comp_has_ugt (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_ugt β (α sz) := ⟨λ x y, has_comp.ult β y x⟩
instance has_comp_has_uge (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v) [s:has_comp α β] {sz:size}
: has_uge β (α sz) := ⟨λ x y, has_comp.ule β y x⟩
class has_overflow_check (α:Π (v:size), Type u) (β:Type v):=
(add_chk sub_chk mul_chk shl_chk:Π {sz:size}, bool → α sz → α sz → β) -- is_sign? → op1 → op2
|
941219830ff6bbfcd39b5f7dd626a599bb967b1d | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /tests/lean/run/t11.lean | 0ff8574ae083f5fd3abec22ac455f9eab53568cb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 297 | lean | constant A : Type
constants a b c : A
constant f : A → A → A
check f a b
section
universe variables u v
parameters A B : Type u
parameters {C D : Type v}
parameters [e : A] [d : A]
check A
check B
definition g (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) : A := e
end
check g.{2 1}
constants x y : A
|
d0814e0691892cafee7f5b7c6e694086dfd0fd94 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/normed/group/basic.lean | 88fc629764a1c857172ca744b8b35ce491256a6a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 80,152 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import analysis.normed.group.seminorm
import order.liminf_limsup
import topology.algebra.uniform_group
import topology.metric_space.algebra
import topology.metric_space.isometry
import topology.sequences
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `has_norm`, `has_nnnorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `seminormed_..._group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `normed_..._group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`seminormed_group` and `seminormed_add_group` not extend `group` and `add_group`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variables {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open filter function metric
open_locale big_operators ennreal filter nnreal uniformity pointwise topological_space
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class] class has_norm (E : Type*) := (norm : E → ℝ)
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class] class has_nnnorm (E : Type*) := (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0)
export has_norm (norm)
export has_nnnorm (nnnorm)
notation `‖` e `‖` := norm e
notation `‖` e `‖₊` := nnnorm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class seminormed_add_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, add_group E, pseudo_metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x - y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ . obviously)
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class seminormed_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, group E, pseudo_metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x / y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ . obviously)
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class normed_add_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, add_group E, metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x - y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ . obviously)
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class normed_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, group E, metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x / y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ . obviously)
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class seminormed_add_comm_group (E : Type*)
extends has_norm E, add_comm_group E, pseudo_metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x - y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ . obviously)
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class seminormed_comm_group (E : Type*)
extends has_norm E, comm_group E, pseudo_metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x / y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ . obviously)
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class normed_add_comm_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, add_comm_group E, metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x - y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ . obviously)
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class normed_comm_group (E : Type*) extends has_norm E, comm_group E, metric_space E :=
(dist := λ x y, ‖x / y‖)
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ . obviously)
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_group.to_seminormed_group [normed_group E] : seminormed_group E :=
{ ..‹normed_group E› }
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group [normed_comm_group E] :
seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..‹normed_comm_group E› }
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group [seminormed_comm_group E] : seminormed_group E :=
{ ..‹seminormed_comm_group E› }
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_comm_group.to_normed_group [normed_comm_group E] : normed_group E :=
{ ..‹normed_comm_group E› }
/-- Construct a `normed_group` from a `seminormed_group` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(pseudo_)metric_space` level when declaring a `normed_group`
instance as a special case of a more general `seminormed_group` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `normed_add_group` from a `seminormed_add_group` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(pseudo_)metric_space` level when
declaring a `normed_add_group` instance as a special case of a more general `seminormed_add_group`
instance.", reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def normed_group.of_separation [seminormed_group E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
normed_group E :=
{ to_metric_space :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y hxy, div_eq_one.1 $ h _ $ by rwa ←‹seminormed_group E›.dist_eq },
..‹seminormed_group E› }
/-- Construct a `normed_comm_group` from a `seminormed_comm_group` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(pseudo_)metric_space` level when
declaring a `normed_comm_group` instance as a special case of a more general `seminormed_comm_group`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `normed_add_comm_group` from a `seminormed_add_comm_group` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(pseudo_)metric_space` level when
declaring a `normed_add_comm_group` instance as a special case of a more general
`seminormed_add_comm_group` instance.", reducible] -- See note [reducible non-instances]
def normed_comm_group.of_separation [seminormed_comm_group E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..‹seminormed_comm_group E›, ..normed_group.of_separation h }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def seminormed_group.of_mul_dist [has_norm E] [group E] [pseudo_metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
seminormed_group E :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw h₁, apply le_antisymm,
{ simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _ },
{ simpa only [div_mul_cancel', one_mul] using h₂ (x/y) 1 y }
end }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' [has_norm E] [group E] [pseudo_metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
seminormed_group E :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw h₁, apply le_antisymm,
{ simpa only [div_mul_cancel', one_mul] using h₂ (x/y) 1 y },
{ simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _ }
end }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist [has_norm E] [comm_group E] [pseudo_metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.of_mul_dist h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' [has_norm E] [comm_group E] [pseudo_metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def normed_group.of_mul_dist [has_norm E] [group E] [metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
normed_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.of_mul_dist h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def normed_group.of_mul_dist' [has_norm E] [group E] [metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
normed_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist [has_norm E] [comm_group E] [metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..normed_group.of_mul_dist h₁ h₂ }
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' [has_norm E] [comm_group E] [metric_space E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..normed_group.of_mul_dist' h₁ h₂ }
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`uniform_space` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance*
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `uniform_space` instance on `E`)."]
def group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group [group E] (f : group_seminorm E) : seminormed_group E :=
{ dist := λ x y, f (x / y),
norm := f,
dist_eq := λ x y, rfl,
dist_self := λ x, by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero],
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f,
dist_comm := map_div_rev f }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`uniform_space` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive "Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance*
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `uniform_space` instance on `E`)."]
def group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group [comm_group E] (f : group_seminorm E) :
seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..f.to_seminormed_group }
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `uniform_space` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `uniform_space`
instance on `E`)."]
def group_norm.to_normed_group [group E] (f : group_norm E) : normed_group E :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y h, div_eq_one.1 $ eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h,
..f.to_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group }
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `uniform_space` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive "Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `uniform_space`
instance on `E`)."]
def group_norm.to_normed_comm_group [comm_group E] (f : group_norm E) : normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..f.to_normed_group }
instance : normed_add_comm_group punit :=
{ norm := function.const _ 0,
dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl, }
@[simp] lemma punit.norm_eq_zero (r : punit) : ‖r‖ = 0 := rfl
section seminormed_group
variables [seminormed_group E] [seminormed_group F] [seminormed_group G] {s : set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ := seminormed_group.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm_sub ← dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm_sub' ← dist_eq_norm'
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ :=
by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext $ λ a, by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
by rw [←dist_one_right, ←h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top]
lemma tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' [proper_space E] : tendsto norm (cocompact E) at_top :=
by simpa only [dist_one_right] using tendsto_dist_right_cocompact_at_top (1 : E)
@[to_additive] lemma norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ :=
by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[simp, to_additive norm_neg]
lemma norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_mul_right (a₁ a₂ b : E) : dist (a₁ * b) (a₂ * b) = dist a₁ a₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ :=
by rw [←dist_one_left, ←dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
@[to_additive] lemma dist_div_right (a₁ a₂ b : E) : dist (a₁ / b) (a₂ / b) = dist a₁ a₂ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using dist_mul_right _ _ _
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) :
dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) :=
by rw [←dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel']
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) :
dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b :=
by rw [←dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel']
/-- In a (semi)normed group, inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` tends to infinity at infinity. TODO: use
`bornology.cobounded` instead of `filter.comap has_norm.norm filter.at_top`. -/
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity. TODO: use
`bornology.cobounded` instead of `filter.comap has_norm.norm filter.at_top`."]
lemma filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded :
tendsto (has_inv.inv : E → E) (comap norm at_top) (comap norm at_top) :=
by simpa only [norm_inv', tendsto_comap_iff, (∘)] using tendsto_comap
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
@[to_additive] lemma norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans $ add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le] lemma norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[simp, to_additive norm_nonneg] lemma norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ :=
by { rw [←dist_one_right], exact dist_nonneg }
section
open tactic tactic.positivity
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: norms are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity]
meta def _root_.tactic.positivity_norm : expr → tactic strictness
| `(‖%%a‖) := nonnegative <$> mk_app ``norm_nonneg [a] <|> nonnegative <$> mk_app ``norm_nonneg' [a]
| _ := failed
end
@[simp, to_additive norm_zero] lemma norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [←dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive] lemma ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt $ by { rintro rfl, exact norm_one' }
@[nontriviality, to_additive norm_of_subsingleton]
lemma norm_of_subsingleton' [subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 :=
by rw [subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
attribute [nontriviality] norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
lemma zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖^2 := by positivity
@[to_additive] lemma norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
@[to_additive] lemma norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) :
‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans $ add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive] lemma dist_le_norm_mul_norm (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ :=
by { rw dist_eq_norm_div, apply norm_div_le }
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le] lemma abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le] lemma norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le] lemma dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive] lemma norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ :=
by { rw add_comm, refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' _, rw div_mul_cancel' }
@[to_additive] lemma norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ :=
by { rw norm_div_rev, exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u }
alias norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub' ← norm_le_insert'
alias norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub ← norm_le_insert
@[to_additive] lemma norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc ‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ : by rw mul_div_cancel''
... ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ : norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive ball_eq] lemma ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = {x | ‖x / y‖ < ε} :=
set.ext $ λ a, by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] lemma ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = {x | ‖x‖ < r} :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm] lemma mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm'] lemma mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closed_ball_iff_norm]
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closed_ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_closed_ball_one_iff : a ∈ closed_ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closed_ball_iff_norm']
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closed_ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball]
lemma norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball' (h : b ∈ closed_ball a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans $ add_le_add_left (by rwa ←dist_eq_norm_div) _
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
lemma norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball'
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
lemma norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt $ add_lt_add_left (by rwa ←dist_eq_norm_div) _
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ :=
by simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right'] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
@[to_additive bounded_iff_forall_norm_le]
lemma bounded_iff_forall_norm_le' : bounded s ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ C :=
by simpa only [set.subset_def, mem_closed_ball_one_iff] using bounded_iff_subset_ball (1 : E)
alias bounded_iff_forall_norm_le' ↔ metric.bounded.exists_norm_le' _
alias bounded_iff_forall_norm_le ↔ metric.bounded.exists_norm_le _
attribute [to_additive metric.bounded.exists_norm_le] metric.bounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le]
lemma metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le' (hs : metric.bounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R :=
let ⟨R₀, hR₀⟩ := hs.exists_norm_le' in
⟨max R₀ 1, by positivity, λ x hx, (hR₀ x hx).trans $ le_max_left _ _⟩
@[simp, to_additive mem_sphere_iff_norm]
lemma mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[simp, to_additive norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
lemma norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1:E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r := mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
@[to_additive] lemma ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero $ by rwa norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
lemma ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x:E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
variables (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def norm_group_seminorm : group_seminorm E := ⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_norm_group_seminorm : ⇑(norm_group_seminorm E) = norm := rfl
variables {E}
namespace isometric
-- TODO This material is superseded by similar constructions such as
-- `affine_isometry_equiv.const_vadd`; deduplicate
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ y * x` as an `isometry`. -/
@[to_additive "Addition `y ↦ y + x` as an `isometry`"]
protected def mul_right (x : E) : E ≃ᵢ E :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry.of_dist_eq $ λ y z, dist_mul_right _ _ _,
.. equiv.mul_right x }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_right_to_equiv (x : E) : (isometric.mul_right x).to_equiv = equiv.mul_right x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_mul_right (x : E) : (isometric.mul_right x : E → E) = λ y, y * x := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_right_apply (x y : E) : (isometric.mul_right x : E → E) y = y * x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_right_symm (x : E) : (isometric.mul_right x).symm = isometric.mul_right x⁻¹ :=
ext $ λ y, rfl
end isometric
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : filter α} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖ f x ‖ < ε :=
metric.tendsto_nhds.trans $ by simp only [dist_one_right]
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε :=
by simp_rw [metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {u : α → E} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → ‖u m / u n‖ < ε :=
by simp [metric.cauchy_seq_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).has_basis (λ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε) (λ ε, {y | ‖y / x‖ < ε}) :=
by { simp_rw ← ball_eq', exact metric.nhds_basis_ball }
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).has_basis (λ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε) (λ ε, {y | ‖y‖ < ε}) :=
by { convert normed_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E), simp }
@[to_additive] lemma normed_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).has_basis (λ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε) (λ ε, {p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε}) :=
by { convert metric.uniformity_basis_dist, simp [dist_eq_norm_div] }
open finset
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`."]
lemma monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : lipschitz_with (real.to_nnreal C) f :=
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le' $ λ x y, by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive] lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
lipschitz_on_with C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ :=
by simp only [lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_div_le ↔ lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le _
attribute [to_additive] lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le
@[to_additive] lemma lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0}
(h : lipschitz_on_with C f s) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) :
‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hr C.2
@[to_additive] lemma lipschitz_with_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
lipschitz_with C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ :=
by simp only [lipschitz_with_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias lipschitz_with_iff_norm_div_le ↔ lipschitz_with.norm_div_le _
attribute [to_additive] lipschitz_with.norm_div_le
@[to_additive] lemma lipschitz_with.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : lipschitz_with C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hr C.2
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
lemma monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : continuous f :=
(monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F]
(f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : uniform_continuous f :=
(monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniform_continuous
@[to_additive is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on]
lemma is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on' [topological_space α] {s : set α}
(hs : is_compact s) {f : α → E} (hf : continuous_on f s) :
∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
(bounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.1 (hs.image_of_continuous_on hf).bounded).imp $ λ C hC x hx,
hC _ $ set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
begin
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ←map_div],
refine ⟨λ h x, _, λ h x y, h _⟩,
simpa using h x 1,
end
alias monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm ↔ _ monoid_hom_class.isometry_of_norm
attribute [to_additive] monoid_hom_class.isometry_of_norm
section nnnorm
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_group.to_has_nnnorm : has_nnnorm E := ⟨λ a, ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive coe_nnnorm] lemma coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[simp, to_additive coe_comp_nnnorm]
lemma coe_comp_nnnorm' : (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm := rfl
@[to_additive norm_to_nnreal]
lemma norm_to_nnreal' : ‖a‖.to_nnreal = ‖a‖₊ := @real.to_nnreal_coe ‖a‖₊
@[to_additive]
lemma nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ := nnreal.eq $ dist_eq_norm_div _ _
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub ← nndist_eq_nnnorm
@[simp, to_additive nnnorm_zero] lemma nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 := nnreal.eq norm_one'
@[to_additive] lemma ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt $ by { rintro rfl, exact nnnorm_one' }
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
lemma nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ := nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ norm_mul_le' a b
@[simp, to_additive nnnorm_neg] lemma nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ := nnreal.eq $ norm_inv' a
@[to_additive] lemma nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
lemma nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ dist_norm_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive] lemma nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
@[to_additive] lemma nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
alias nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub' ← nnnorm_le_insert'
alias nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub ← nnnorm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ := norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
@[to_additive of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : ennreal.of_real ‖a‖ = ‖a‖₊ :=
ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal _
@[to_additive] lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
by rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm']
@[to_additive edist_eq_coe_nnnorm] lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' (x : E) : edist x 1 = (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ emetric.ball (1 : E) r ↔ ↑‖a‖₊ < r :=
by rw [emetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm']
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_mul_right (a₁ a₂ b : E) : edist (a₁ * b) (a₂ * b) = edist a₁ a₂ :=
by simp [edist_dist]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_div_right (a₁ a₂ b : E) : edist (a₁ / b) (a₂ / b) = edist a₁ a₂ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using edist_mul_right _ _ _
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(C : ℝ≥0) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) : lipschitz_with C f :=
@real.to_nnreal_coe C ▸ monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound f C h
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.antilipschitz_of_bound [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
{K : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) :
antilipschitz_with K f :=
antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist $ λ x y, by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom_class.bound_of_antilipschitz [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
{K : ℝ≥0} (h : antilipschitz_with K f) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ :=
by simpa only [dist_one_right, map_one] using h.le_mul_dist x 1
end nnnorm
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_one {f : α → E} {a : filter α} {b : E} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ‖f e / b‖) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { convert tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero, simp [dist_eq_norm_div] }
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_one {f : α → E} {a : filter α} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 1) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ‖f e‖) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_one, simp only [div_one] }
@[to_additive] lemma comap_norm_nhds_one : comap norm (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 (1 : E) :=
by simpa only [dist_one_right] using nhds_comap_dist (1 : E)
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_one_norm'`
and `squeeze_one_norm`), following a convention of similar lemmas in `topology.metric_space.basic`
and `topology.algebra.order`, the `'` version is phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version
is phrased absolutely. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. In this pair of lemmas
(`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of similar lemmas in
`topology.metric_space.basic` and `topology.algebra.order`, the `'` version is phrased using
\"eventually\" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely."]
lemma squeeze_one_norm' {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n)
(h' : tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0)) : tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_one.2 $ squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall $ λ n, norm_nonneg' _) h h'
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `a` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`."]
lemma squeeze_one_norm {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : filter α} (h : ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n) :
tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0) → tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
squeeze_one_norm' $ eventually_of_forall h
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_norm_div_self (x : E) : tendsto (λ a, ‖a / x‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using
tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ a, (x:E)) (𝓝 x) _)
@[to_additive tendsto_norm]lemma tendsto_norm' {x : E} : tendsto (λ a, ‖a‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 ‖x‖) :=
by simpa using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ a, (1:E)) _ _)
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_norm_one : tendsto (λ a : E, ‖a‖) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa using tendsto_norm_div_self (1:E)
@[continuity, to_additive continuous_norm] lemma continuous_norm' : continuous (λ a : E, ‖a‖) :=
by simpa using continuous_id.dist (continuous_const : continuous (λ a, (1:E)))
@[continuity, to_additive continuous_nnnorm]
lemma continuous_nnnorm' : continuous (λ a : E, ‖a‖₊) := continuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
@[to_additive lipschitz_with_one_norm] lemma lipschitz_with_one_norm' :
lipschitz_with 1 (norm : E → ℝ) :=
by simpa only [dist_one_left] using lipschitz_with.dist_right (1 : E)
@[to_additive lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm] lemma lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm' :
lipschitz_with 1 (has_nnnorm.nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) :=
lipschitz_with_one_norm'
@[to_additive uniform_continuous_norm]
lemma uniform_continuous_norm' : uniform_continuous (norm : E → ℝ) :=
lipschitz_with_one_norm'.uniform_continuous
@[to_additive uniform_continuous_nnnorm]
lemma uniform_continuous_nnnorm' : uniform_continuous (λ (a : E), ‖a‖₊) :=
uniform_continuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
@[to_additive] lemma mem_closure_one_iff_norm {x : E} : x ∈ closure ({1} : set E) ↔ ‖x‖ = 0 :=
by rw [←closed_ball_zero', mem_closed_ball_one_iff, (norm_nonneg' x).le_iff_eq]
@[to_additive] lemma closure_one_eq : closure ({1} : set E) = {x | ‖x‖ = 0} :=
set.ext (λ x, mem_closure_one_iff_norm)
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead of
multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead
of multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
lemma filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le' {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : filter α}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : is_bounded_under (≤) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∃ A, ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :
tendsto (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) :=
begin
cases h_op with A h_op,
rcases hg with ⟨C, hC⟩, rw eventually_map at hC,
rw normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_one at hf ⊢,
intros ε ε₀,
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε₀ (A * C) with ⟨δ, δ₀, hδ⟩,
filter_upwards [hf δ δ₀, hC] with i hf hg,
refine (h_op _ _).trans_lt _,
cases le_total A 0 with hA hA,
{ exact (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hA $ norm_nonneg' _) $
norm_nonneg' _).trans_lt ε₀ },
calc A * ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖ ≤ A * δ * C :
mul_le_mul (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hf.le hA) hg (norm_nonneg' _) (mul_nonneg hA δ₀.le)
... = A * C * δ : mul_right_comm _ _ _
... < ε : hδ,
end
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so that it
can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so that
it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
lemma filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : filter α}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : is_bounded_under (≤) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :
tendsto (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) :=
hf.op_one_is_bounded_under_le' hg op ⟨1, λ x y, (one_mul (‖x‖)).symm ▸ h_op x y⟩
section
variables {l : filter α} {f : α → E}
@[to_additive filter.tendsto.norm] lemma filter.tendsto.norm' (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, ‖f x‖) l (𝓝 ‖a‖) :=
tendsto_norm'.comp h
@[to_additive filter.tendsto.nnnorm] lemma filter.tendsto.nnnorm' (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) l (𝓝 (‖a‖₊)) :=
tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm'.continuous_at h
end
section
variables [topological_space α] {f : α → E}
@[to_additive continuous.norm] lemma continuous.norm' : continuous f → continuous (λ x, ‖f x‖) :=
continuous_norm'.comp
@[to_additive continuous.nnnorm]
lemma continuous.nnnorm' : continuous f → continuous (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) := continuous_nnnorm'.comp
@[to_additive continuous_at.norm]
lemma continuous_at.norm' {a : α} (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ‖f x‖) a := h.norm'
@[to_additive continuous_at.nnnorm]
lemma continuous_at.nnnorm' {a : α} (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) a :=
h.nnnorm'
@[to_additive continuous_within_at.norm]
lemma continuous_within_at.norm' {s : set α} {a : α} (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ‖f x‖) s a :=
h.norm'
@[to_additive continuous_within_at.nnnorm]
lemma continuous_within_at.nnnorm' {s : set α} {a : α} (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) s a :=
h.nnnorm'
@[to_additive continuous_on.norm]
lemma continuous_on.norm' {s : set α} (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ‖f x‖) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).norm'
@[to_additive continuous_on.nnnorm]
lemma continuous_on.nnnorm' {s : set α} (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ‖f x‖₊) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).nnnorm'
end
/-- If `‖y‖ → ∞`, then we can assume `y ≠ x` for any fixed `x`. -/
@[to_additive eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top "If `‖y‖→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any
fixed `x`"]
lemma eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top' {l : filter α} {f : α → E}
(h : tendsto (λ y, ‖f y‖) l at_top) (x : E) :
∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
(h.eventually_ne_at_top _).mono $ λ x, ne_of_apply_ne norm
@[to_additive] lemma seminormed_comm_group.mem_closure_iff :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ b ∈ s, ‖a / b‖ < ε :=
by simp [metric.mem_closure_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_zero_iff'] lemma norm_le_zero_iff''' [t0_space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 :=
begin
letI : normed_group E :=
{ to_metric_space := metric.of_t0_pseudo_metric_space E, ..‹seminormed_group E› },
rw [←dist_one_right, dist_le_zero],
end
@[to_additive norm_eq_zero'] lemma norm_eq_zero''' [t0_space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 :=
(norm_nonneg' a).le_iff_eq.symm.trans norm_le_zero_iff'''
@[to_additive norm_pos_iff'] lemma norm_pos_iff''' [t0_space E] {a : E} : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
by rw [← not_le, norm_le_zero_iff''']
@[to_additive]
lemma seminormed_group.tendsto_uniformly_on_one {f : ι → κ → G} {s : set κ} {l : filter ι} :
tendsto_uniformly_on f 1 l s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ i in l, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f i x‖ < ε :=
by simp_rw [tendsto_uniformly_on_iff, pi.one_apply, dist_one_left]
@[to_additive]
lemma seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_one
{f : ι → κ → G} {l : filter ι} {l' : filter κ} : uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter f l l' ↔
tendsto_uniformly_on_filter (λ n : ι × ι, λ z, f n.fst z / f n.snd z) 1 (l ×ᶠ l) l' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hf u hu, _, λ hf u hu, _⟩,
{ obtain ⟨ε, hε, H⟩ := uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff.mp hu,
refine (hf {p : G × G | dist p.fst p.snd < ε} $ dist_mem_uniformity hε).mono (λ x hx,
H 1 (f x.fst.fst x.snd / f x.fst.snd x.snd) _),
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div, norm_div_rev] using hx },
{ obtain ⟨ε, hε, H⟩ := uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff.mp hu,
refine (hf {p : G × G | dist p.fst p.snd < ε} $ dist_mem_uniformity hε).mono (λ x hx,
H (f x.fst.fst x.snd) (f x.fst.snd x.snd) _),
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div, norm_div_rev] using hx }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_one
{f : ι → κ → G} {s : set κ} {l : filter ι} :
uniform_cauchy_seq_on f l s ↔
tendsto_uniformly_on (λ n : ι × ι, λ z, f n.fst z / f n.snd z) 1 (l ×ᶠ l) s :=
by rw [tendsto_uniformly_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter,
uniform_cauchy_seq_on_iff_uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter,
seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_one]
end seminormed_group
section induced
variables (E F)
/-- A group homomorphism from a `group` to a `seminormed_group` induces a `seminormed_group`
structure on the domain. -/
@[reducible, -- See note [reducible non-instances]
to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `add_group` to a `seminormed_add_group` induces a
`seminormed_add_group` structure on the domain."]
def seminormed_group.induced [group E] [seminormed_group F] [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
seminormed_group E :=
{ norm := λ x, ‖f x‖,
dist_eq := λ x y, by simpa only [map_div, ←dist_eq_norm_div],
..pseudo_metric_space.induced f _ }
/-- A group homomorphism from a `comm_group` to a `seminormed_group` induces a
`seminormed_comm_group` structure on the domain. -/
@[reducible, -- See note [reducible non-instances]
to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `add_comm_group` to a `seminormed_add_group` induces a
`seminormed_add_comm_group` structure on the domain."]
def seminormed_comm_group.induced [comm_group E] [seminormed_group F] [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F]
(f : 𝓕) : seminormed_comm_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.induced E F f }
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `group` to a `normed_group` induces a `normed_group`
structure on the domain. -/
@[reducible, -- See note [reducible non-instances].
to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from an `add_group` to a `normed_add_group` induces a
`normed_add_group` structure on the domain."]
def normed_group.induced [group E] [normed_group F] [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : injective f) : normed_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.induced E F f, ..metric_space.induced f h _ }
/-- An injective group homomorphism from an `comm_group` to a `normed_group` induces a
`normed_comm_group` structure on the domain. -/
@[reducible, -- See note [reducible non-instances].
to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from an `comm_group` to a `normed_comm_group` induces a
`normed_comm_group` structure on the domain."]
def normed_comm_group.induced [comm_group E] [normed_group F] [monoid_hom_class 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : injective f) : normed_comm_group E :=
{ ..seminormed_group.induced E F f, ..metric_space.induced f h _ }
end induced
section seminormed_comm_group
variables [seminormed_comm_group E] [seminormed_comm_group F] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_mul_left (a b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a * b₁) (a * b₂) = dist b₁ b₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] lemma dist_inv (x y : E) : dist x⁻¹ y = dist x y⁻¹ :=
by simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_div, ←norm_inv' (x⁻¹ / y), inv_div, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_inv_inv (a b : E) : dist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = dist a b :=
by rw [dist_inv, inv_inv]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_div_left (a b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a / b₁) (a / b₂) = dist b₁ b₂ :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_mul_left, dist_inv_inv]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_self_mul_right (a b : E) : dist a (a * b) = ‖b‖ :=
by rw [←dist_one_left, ←dist_mul_left a 1 b, mul_one]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_self_mul_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) a = ‖b‖ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_self_mul_right]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_self_div_right (a b : E) : dist a (a / b) = ‖b‖ :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_self_mul_right, norm_inv']
@[simp, to_additive] lemma dist_self_div_left (a b : E) : dist (a / b) a = ‖b‖ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_self_div_right]
@[to_additive] lemma dist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ :=
by simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right] using dist_triangle (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
@[to_additive] lemma dist_mul_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans $ add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive] lemma dist_div_div_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_inv_inv] using dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂⁻¹ b₁ b₂⁻¹
@[to_additive] lemma dist_div_div_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_div_div_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans $ add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive] lemma abs_dist_sub_le_dist_mul_mul (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
|dist a₁ b₁ - dist a₂ b₂| ≤ dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) :=
by simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right, dist_comm b₂]
using abs_dist_sub_le (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) (b₁ * a₂)
lemma norm_multiset_sum_le {E} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] (m : multiset E) :
‖m.sum‖ ≤ (m.map (λ x, ‖x‖)).sum :=
m.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_multiset_prod_le (m : multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖ ≤ (m.map $ λ x, ‖x‖).sum :=
begin
rw [←multiplicative.of_add_le, of_add_multiset_prod, multiset.map_map],
refine multiset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (multiplicative.of_add ∘ norm) _ (λ x y, _) _,
{ simp only [comp_app, norm_one', of_add_zero] },
{ exact norm_mul_le' _ _ }
end
lemma norm_sum_le {E} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) :
‖∑ i in s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i in s, ‖f i‖ :=
s.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le f
@[to_additive] lemma norm_prod_le (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ i in s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i in s, ‖f i‖ :=
begin
rw [←multiplicative.of_add_le, of_add_sum],
refine finset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (multiplicative.of_add ∘ norm) _ (λ x y, _) _ _,
{ simp only [comp_app, norm_one', of_add_zero] },
{ exact norm_mul_le' _ _ }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_prod_le_of_le (s : finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b in s, f b‖ ≤ ∑ b in s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le s f).trans $ finset.sum_le_sum h
@[to_additive] lemma dist_prod_prod_le_of_le (s : finset ι) {f a : ι → E} {d : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) ≤ d b) :
dist (∏ b in s, f b) (∏ b in s, a b) ≤ ∑ b in s, d b :=
by { simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, ← finset.prod_div_distrib] at *, exact norm_prod_le_of_le s h }
@[to_additive] lemma dist_prod_prod_le (s : finset ι) (f a : ι → E) :
dist (∏ b in s, f b) (∏ b in s, a b) ≤ ∑ b in s, dist (f b) (a b) :=
dist_prod_prod_le_of_le s $ λ _ _, le_rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_mem_ball_iff_norm : a * b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b‖ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel''']
@[to_additive] lemma mul_mem_closed_ball_iff_norm : a * b ∈ closed_ball a r ↔ ‖b‖ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel''']
@[simp, to_additive] lemma preimage_mul_ball (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
((*) b) ⁻¹' ball a r = ball (a / b) r :=
by { ext c, simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm] }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma preimage_mul_closed_ball (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
((*) b) ⁻¹' (closed_ball a r) = closed_ball (a / b) r :=
by { ext c,
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, set.mem_preimage, mem_closed_ball, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm] }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma preimage_mul_sphere (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
((*) b) ⁻¹' sphere a r = sphere (a / b) r :=
by { ext c, simp only [set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_iff_norm', div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm] }
namespace isometric
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ x * y` as an `isometry`. -/
@[to_additive "Addition `y ↦ x + y` as an `isometry`"]
protected def mul_left (x : E) : E ≃ᵢ E :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry.of_dist_eq $ λ y z, dist_mul_left _ _ _,
to_equiv := equiv.mul_left x }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_left_to_equiv (x : E) :
(isometric.mul_left x).to_equiv = equiv.mul_left x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_mul_left (x : E) : ⇑(isometric.mul_left x) = (*) x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_left_symm (x : E) :
(isometric.mul_left x).symm = isometric.mul_left x⁻¹ :=
ext $ λ y, rfl
variables (E)
/-- Inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an `isometry`. -/
@[to_additive "Negation `x ↦ -x` as an `isometry`."] protected def inv : E ≃ᵢ E :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry.of_dist_eq $ λ x y, dist_inv_inv _ _,
to_equiv := equiv.inv E }
variables {E}
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_symm : (isometric.inv E).symm = isometric.inv E := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_to_equiv : (isometric.inv E).to_equiv = equiv.inv E := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_inv : ⇑(isometric.inv E) = has_inv.inv := rfl
end isometric
open finset
@[to_additive] lemma controlled_prod_of_mem_closure {s : subgroup E} (hg : a ∈ closure (s : set E))
{b : ℕ → ℝ} (b_pos : ∀ n, 0 < b n) :
∃ v : ℕ → E,
tendsto (λ n, ∏ i in range (n+1), v i) at_top (𝓝 a) ∧
(∀ n, v n ∈ s) ∧
‖v 0 / a‖ < b 0 ∧
∀ n, 0 < n → ‖v n‖ < b n :=
begin
obtain ⟨u : ℕ → E, u_in : ∀ n, u n ∈ s, lim_u : tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a)⟩ :=
mem_closure_iff_seq_limit.mp hg,
obtain ⟨n₀, hn₀⟩ : ∃ n₀, ∀ n ≥ n₀, ‖u n / a‖ < b 0,
{ have : {x | ‖x / a‖ < b 0} ∈ 𝓝 a,
{ simp_rw ← dist_eq_norm_div,
exact metric.ball_mem_nhds _ (b_pos _) },
exact filter.tendsto_at_top'.mp lim_u _ this },
set z : ℕ → E := λ n, u (n + n₀),
have lim_z : tendsto z at_top (𝓝 a) := lim_u.comp (tendsto_add_at_top_nat n₀),
have mem_𝓤 : ∀ n, {p : E × E | ‖p.1 / p.2‖ < b (n + 1)} ∈ 𝓤 E :=
λ n, by simpa [← dist_eq_norm_div] using metric.dist_mem_uniformity (b_pos $ n+1),
obtain ⟨φ : ℕ → ℕ, φ_extr : strict_mono φ,
hφ : ∀ n, ‖z (φ $ n + 1) / z (φ n)‖ < b (n + 1)⟩ :=
lim_z.cauchy_seq.subseq_mem mem_𝓤,
set w : ℕ → E := z ∘ φ,
have hw : tendsto w at_top (𝓝 a),
from lim_z.comp φ_extr.tendsto_at_top,
set v : ℕ → E := λ i, if i = 0 then w 0 else w i / w (i - 1),
refine ⟨v, tendsto.congr (finset.eq_prod_range_div' w) hw , _,
hn₀ _ (n₀.le_add_left _), _⟩,
{ rintro ⟨⟩,
{ change w 0 ∈ s,
apply u_in },
{ apply s.div_mem ; apply u_in }, },
{ intros l hl,
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ : ∃ k, l = k+1, exact nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hl.ne',
apply hφ }
end
@[to_additive] lemma controlled_prod_of_mem_closure_range {j : E →* F} {b : F}
(hb : b ∈ closure (j.range : set F)) {f : ℕ → ℝ} (b_pos : ∀ n, 0 < f n) :
∃ a : ℕ → E,
tendsto (λ n, ∏ i in range (n + 1), j (a i)) at_top (𝓝 b) ∧
‖j (a 0) / b‖ < f 0 ∧
∀ n, 0 < n → ‖j (a n)‖ < f n :=
begin
obtain ⟨v, sum_v, v_in, hv₀, hv_pos⟩ := controlled_prod_of_mem_closure hb b_pos,
choose g hg using v_in,
refine ⟨g, by simpa [← hg] using sum_v, by simpa [hg 0] using hv₀, λ n hn,
by simpa [hg] using hv_pos n hn⟩,
end
@[to_additive] lemma nndist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
nndist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ nndist a₁ b₁ + nndist a₂ b₂ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂
@[to_additive]
lemma edist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : edist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ edist a₁ b₁ + edist a₂ b₂ :=
by { simp only [edist_nndist], norm_cast, apply nndist_mul_mul_le }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_mul_left (a b₁ b₂ : E) : edist (a * b₁) (a * b₂) = edist b₁ b₂ :=
by simp [edist_dist]
@[to_additive]
lemma edist_inv (a b : E) : edist a⁻¹ b = edist a b⁻¹ := by simp_rw [edist_dist, dist_inv]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_inv_inv (x y : E) : edist x⁻¹ y⁻¹ = edist x y :=
by rw [edist_inv, inv_inv]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma edist_div_left (a b₁ b₂ : E) : edist (a / b₁) (a / b₂) = edist b₁ b₂ :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, edist_mul_left, edist_inv_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_multiset_prod_le (m : multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖₊ ≤ (m.map (λ x, ‖x‖₊)).sum :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ by { push_cast, rw multiset.map_map, exact norm_multiset_prod_le _ }
@[to_additive] lemma nnnorm_prod_le (s : finset ι) (f : ι → E) :
‖∏ a in s, f a‖₊ ≤ ∑ a in s, ‖f a‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ by { push_cast, exact norm_prod_le _ _ }
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_prod_le_of_le (s : finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖₊ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b in s, f b‖₊ ≤ ∑ b in s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le_of_le s h).trans_eq nnreal.coe_sum.symm
namespace real
instance : has_norm ℝ := { norm := λ r, |r| }
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ = |r| := rfl
instance : normed_add_comm_group ℝ := ⟨λ r y, rfl⟩
lemma norm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ = r := abs_of_nonneg hr
lemma norm_of_nonpos (hr : r ≤ 0) : ‖r‖ = -r := abs_of_nonpos hr
lemma le_norm_self (r : ℝ) : r ≤ ‖r‖ := le_abs_self r
@[simp] lemma norm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖₊ = n := nnreal.eq $ norm_coe_nat _
@[simp] lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖ = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖₊ = 2 := nnreal.eq $ by simp
lemma nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖₊ = ⟨r, hr⟩ := nnreal.eq $ norm_of_nonneg hr
lemma ennnorm_eq_of_real (hr : 0 ≤ r) : (‖r‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real r :=
by { rw [← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, norm_of_nonneg hr] }
lemma to_nnreal_eq_nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.to_nnreal = ‖r‖₊ :=
begin
rw real.to_nnreal_of_nonneg hr,
congr,
rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hr],
end
lemma of_real_le_ennnorm (r : ℝ) : ennreal.of_real r ≤ ‖r‖₊ :=
begin
obtain hr | hr := le_total 0 r,
{ exact (real.ennnorm_eq_of_real hr).ge },
{ rw [ennreal.of_real_eq_zero.2 hr],
exact bot_le }
end
end real
namespace lipschitz_with
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] {K Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f g : α → E}
@[to_additive] lemma inv (hf : lipschitz_with K f) : lipschitz_with K (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) :=
λ x y, (edist_inv_inv _ _).trans_le $ hf x y
@[to_additive add] lemma mul' (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x * g x) :=
λ x y, calc
edist (f x * g x) (f y * g y) ≤ edist (f x) (f y) + edist (g x) (g y) : edist_mul_mul_le _ _ _ _
... ≤ Kf * edist x y + Kg * edist x y : add_le_add (hf x y) (hg x y)
... = (Kf + Kg) * edist x y : (add_mul _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive] lemma div (hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x / g x) :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul' hg.inv
end lipschitz_with
namespace antilipschitz_with
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] {K Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f g : α → E}
@[to_additive] lemma mul_lipschitz_with (hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f) (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g)
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ (λ x, f x * g x) :=
begin
letI : pseudo_metric_space α := pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space hf.edist_ne_top,
refine antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist (λ x y, _),
rw [nnreal.coe_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
rw le_div_iff (nnreal.coe_pos.2 $ tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hK),
rw [mul_comm, nnreal.coe_sub hK.le, sub_mul],
calc ↑Kf⁻¹ * dist x y - Kg * dist x y ≤ dist (f x) (f y) - dist (g x) (g y) :
sub_le_sub (hf.mul_le_dist x y) (hg.dist_le_mul x y)
... ≤ _ : le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_dist_sub_le_dist_mul_mul _ _ _ _),
end
@[to_additive] lemma mul_div_lipschitz_with (hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f)
(hg : lipschitz_with Kg (g / f)) (hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ g :=
by simpa only [pi.div_apply, mul_div_cancel'_right] using hf.mul_lipschitz_with hg hK
@[to_additive] lemma le_mul_norm_div {f : E → F} (hf : antilipschitz_with K f) (x y : E) :
‖x / y‖ ≤ K * ‖f x / f y‖ :=
by simp [← dist_eq_norm_div, hf.le_mul_dist x y]
end antilipschitz_with
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_comm_group.to_has_lipschitz_mul : has_lipschitz_mul E :=
⟨⟨1 + 1, lipschitz_with.prod_fst.mul' lipschitz_with.prod_snd⟩⟩
/-- A seminormed group is a uniform group, i.e., multiplication and division are uniformly
continuous. -/
@[priority 100, to_additive "A seminormed group is a uniform additive group, i.e., addition and
subtraction are uniformly continuous."] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_comm_group.to_uniform_group : uniform_group E :=
⟨(lipschitz_with.prod_fst.div lipschitz_with.prod_snd).uniform_continuous⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance seminormed_comm_group.to_topological_group : topological_group E := infer_instance
@[to_additive] lemma cauchy_seq_prod_of_eventually_eq {u v : ℕ → E} {N : ℕ}
(huv : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = v n) (hv : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∏ k in range (n+1), v k)) :
cauchy_seq (λ n, ∏ k in range (n + 1), u k) :=
begin
let d : ℕ → E := λ n, ∏ k in range (n + 1), (u k / v k),
rw show (λ n, ∏ k in range (n + 1), u k) = d * (λ n, ∏ k in range (n + 1), v k),
by { ext n, simp [d] },
suffices : ∀ n ≥ N, d n = d N,
{ exact (tendsto_at_top_of_eventually_const this).cauchy_seq.mul hv },
intros n hn,
dsimp [d],
rw eventually_constant_prod _ hn,
intros m hm,
simp [huv m hm],
end
end seminormed_comm_group
section normed_group
variables [normed_group E] [normed_group F] {a b : E}
@[simp, to_additive norm_eq_zero] lemma norm_eq_zero'' : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := norm_eq_zero'''
@[to_additive norm_ne_zero_iff] lemma norm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := norm_eq_zero''.not
@[simp, to_additive norm_pos_iff] lemma norm_pos_iff'' : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 := norm_pos_iff'''
@[simp, to_additive norm_le_zero_iff]
lemma norm_le_zero_iff'' : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 := norm_le_zero_iff'''
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_zero_iff : ‖a / b‖ = 0 ↔ a = b := by rw [norm_eq_zero'', div_eq_one]
@[to_additive] lemma norm_div_pos_iff : 0 < ‖a / b‖ ↔ a ≠ b :=
by { rw [(norm_nonneg' _).lt_iff_ne, ne_comm], exact norm_div_eq_zero_iff.not }
@[to_additive] lemma eq_of_norm_div_le_zero (h : ‖a / b‖ ≤ 0) : a = b :=
by rwa [←div_eq_one, ← norm_le_zero_iff'']
alias norm_div_eq_zero_iff ↔ eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero _
attribute [to_additive] eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero
@[simp, to_additive nnnorm_eq_zero] lemma nnnorm_eq_zero' : ‖a‖₊ = 0 ↔ a = 1 :=
by rw [← nnreal.coe_eq_zero, coe_nnnorm', norm_eq_zero'']
@[to_additive nnnorm_ne_zero_iff]
lemma nnnorm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := nnnorm_eq_zero'.not
@[to_additive]
lemma tendsto_norm_div_self_punctured_nhds (a : E) : tendsto (λ x, ‖x / a‖) (𝓝[≠] a) (𝓝[>] 0) :=
(tendsto_norm_div_self a).inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ λ x hx, norm_pos_iff''.2 $
div_ne_one.2 hx
@[to_additive] lemma tendsto_norm_nhds_within_one : tendsto (norm : E → ℝ) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_norm_one.inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ λ x, norm_pos_iff''.2
variables (E)
/-- The norm of a normed group as a group norm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a normed group as an additive group norm."]
def norm_group_norm : group_norm E :=
{ eq_one_of_map_eq_zero' := λ _, norm_eq_zero''.1, ..norm_group_seminorm _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_norm_group_norm : ⇑(norm_group_norm E) = norm := rfl
end normed_group
section normed_add_group
variables [normed_add_group E] [topological_space α] {f : α → E}
/-! Some relations with `has_compact_support` -/
lemma has_compact_support_norm_iff : has_compact_support (λ x, ‖f x‖) ↔ has_compact_support f :=
has_compact_support_comp_left $ λ x, norm_eq_zero
alias has_compact_support_norm_iff ↔ _ has_compact_support.norm
lemma continuous.bounded_above_of_compact_support (hf : continuous f) (h : has_compact_support f) :
∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
by simpa [bdd_above_def] using hf.norm.bdd_above_range_of_has_compact_support h.norm
end normed_add_group
/-! ### `ulift` -/
namespace ulift
section has_norm
variables [has_norm E]
instance : has_norm (ulift E) := ⟨λ x, ‖x.down‖⟩
lemma norm_def (x : ulift E) : ‖x‖ = ‖x.down‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_up (x : E) : ‖ulift.up x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_down (x : ulift E) : ‖x.down‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
end has_norm
section has_nnnorm
variables [has_nnnorm E]
instance : has_nnnorm (ulift E) := ⟨λ x, ‖x.down‖₊⟩
lemma nnnorm_def (x : ulift E) : ‖x‖₊ = ‖x.down‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_up (x : E) : ‖ulift.up x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_down (x : ulift E) : ‖x.down‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
end has_nnnorm
@[to_additive] instance seminormed_group [seminormed_group E] : seminormed_group (ulift E) :=
seminormed_group.induced _ _ (⟨ulift.down, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩ : ulift E →* E)
@[to_additive]
instance seminormed_comm_group [seminormed_comm_group E] : seminormed_comm_group (ulift E) :=
seminormed_comm_group.induced _ _ (⟨ulift.down, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩ : ulift E →* E)
@[to_additive] instance normed_group [normed_group E] : normed_group (ulift E) :=
normed_group.induced _ _ (⟨ulift.down, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩ : ulift E →* E) down_injective
@[to_additive]
instance normed_comm_group [normed_comm_group E] : normed_comm_group (ulift E) :=
normed_comm_group.induced _ _ (⟨ulift.down, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩ : ulift E →* E) down_injective
end ulift
/-! ### `additive`, `multiplicative` -/
section additive_multiplicative
open additive multiplicative
section has_norm
variables [has_norm E]
instance : has_norm (additive E) := ‹has_norm E›
instance : has_norm (multiplicative E) := ‹has_norm E›
@[simp] lemma norm_to_mul (x) : ‖(to_mul x : E)‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_of_mul (x : E) : ‖of_mul x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_to_add (x) : ‖(to_add x : E)‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_of_add (x : E) : ‖of_add x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
end has_norm
section has_nnnorm
variables [has_nnnorm E]
instance : has_nnnorm (additive E) := ‹has_nnnorm E›
instance : has_nnnorm (multiplicative E) := ‹has_nnnorm E›
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_to_mul (x) : ‖(to_mul x : E)‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_of_mul (x : E) : ‖of_mul x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_to_add (x) : ‖(to_add x : E)‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_of_add (x : E) : ‖of_add x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
end has_nnnorm
instance [seminormed_group E] : seminormed_add_group (additive E) :=
{ dist_eq := dist_eq_norm_div }
instance [seminormed_add_group E] : seminormed_group (multiplicative E) :=
{ dist_eq := dist_eq_norm_sub }
instance [seminormed_comm_group E] : seminormed_add_comm_group (additive E) :=
{ ..additive.seminormed_add_group }
instance [seminormed_add_comm_group E] : seminormed_comm_group (multiplicative E) :=
{ ..multiplicative.seminormed_group }
instance [normed_group E] : normed_add_group (additive E) :=
{ ..additive.seminormed_add_group }
instance [normed_add_group E] : normed_group (multiplicative E) :=
{ ..multiplicative.seminormed_group }
instance [normed_comm_group E] : normed_add_comm_group (additive E) :=
{ ..additive.seminormed_add_group }
instance [normed_add_comm_group E] : normed_comm_group (multiplicative E) :=
{ ..multiplicative.seminormed_group }
end additive_multiplicative
/-! ### Order dual -/
section order_dual
open order_dual
section has_norm
variables [has_norm E]
instance : has_norm Eᵒᵈ := ‹has_norm E›
@[simp] lemma norm_to_dual (x : E) : ‖to_dual x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_of_dual (x : Eᵒᵈ) : ‖of_dual x‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
end has_norm
section has_nnnorm
variables [has_nnnorm E]
instance : has_nnnorm Eᵒᵈ := ‹has_nnnorm E›
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_to_dual (x : E) : ‖to_dual x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_of_dual (x : Eᵒᵈ) : ‖of_dual x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
end has_nnnorm
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance [seminormed_group E] : seminormed_group Eᵒᵈ := ‹seminormed_group E›
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance [seminormed_comm_group E] : seminormed_comm_group Eᵒᵈ := ‹seminormed_comm_group E›
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance [normed_group E] : normed_group Eᵒᵈ := ‹normed_group E›
@[priority 100, to_additive] -- See note [lower instance priority]
instance [normed_comm_group E] : normed_comm_group Eᵒᵈ := ‹normed_comm_group E›
end order_dual
/-! ### Binary product of normed groups -/
section has_norm
variables [has_norm E] [has_norm F] {x : E × F} {r : ℝ}
instance : has_norm (E × F) := ⟨λ x, ‖x.1‖ ⊔ ‖x.2‖⟩
lemma prod.norm_def (x : E × F) : ‖x‖ = (max ‖x.1‖ ‖x.2‖) := rfl
lemma norm_fst_le (x : E × F) : ‖x.1‖ ≤ ‖x‖ := le_max_left _ _
lemma norm_snd_le (x : E × F) : ‖x.2‖ ≤ ‖x‖ := le_max_right _ _
lemma norm_prod_le_iff : ‖x‖ ≤ r ↔ ‖x.1‖ ≤ r ∧ ‖x.2‖ ≤ r := max_le_iff
end has_norm
section seminormed_group
variables [seminormed_group E] [seminormed_group F]
/-- Product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance : seminormed_group (E × F) :=
⟨λ x y, by simp only [prod.norm_def, prod.dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, prod.fst_div, prod.snd_div]⟩
@[to_additive prod.nnnorm_def']
lemma prod.nnorm_def (x : E × F) : ‖x‖₊ = (max ‖x.1‖₊ ‖x.2‖₊) := rfl
end seminormed_group
/-- Product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance [seminormed_comm_group E] [seminormed_comm_group F] : seminormed_comm_group (E × F) :=
{ ..prod.seminormed_group }
/-- Product of normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Product of normed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance [normed_group E] [normed_group F] : normed_group (E × F) := { ..prod.seminormed_group }
/-- Product of normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Product of normed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance [normed_comm_group E] [normed_comm_group F] : normed_comm_group (E × F) :=
{ ..prod.seminormed_group }
/-! ### Finite product of normed groups -/
section pi
variables {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι]
section seminormed_group
variables [Π i, seminormed_group (π i)] [seminormed_group E] (f : Π i, π i) {x : Π i, π i} {r : ℝ}
/-- Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance : seminormed_group (Π i, π i) :=
{ norm := λ f, ↑(finset.univ.sup (λ b, ‖f b‖₊)),
dist_eq := λ x y,
congr_arg (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) $ congr_arg (finset.sup finset.univ) $ funext $ λ a,
show nndist (x a) (y a) = ‖x a / y a‖₊, from nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (x a) (y a) }
@[to_additive pi.norm_def] lemma pi.norm_def' : ‖f‖ = ↑(finset.univ.sup (λ b, ‖f b‖₊)) := rfl
@[to_additive pi.nnnorm_def] lemma pi.nnnorm_def' : ‖f‖₊ = finset.univ.sup (λ b, ‖f b‖₊) :=
subtype.eta _ _
/-- The seminorm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
@[to_additive pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg "The seminorm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if
and only if the norm of each component is."]
lemma pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖x‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i, ‖x i‖ ≤ r :=
by simp only [←dist_one_right, dist_pi_le_iff hr, pi.one_apply]
@[to_additive pi_nnnorm_le_iff]
lemma pi_nnnorm_le_iff' {r : ℝ≥0} : ‖x‖₊ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i, ‖x i‖₊ ≤ r :=
pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' r.coe_nonneg
@[to_additive pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonempty]
lemma pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonempty' [nonempty ι] : ‖f‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ b, ‖f b‖ ≤ r :=
begin
by_cases hr : 0 ≤ r,
{ exact pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' hr },
{ exact iff_of_false (λ h, hr $ (norm_nonneg' _).trans h)
(λ h, hr $ (norm_nonneg' _).trans $ h $ classical.arbitrary _) }
end
/-- The seminorm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
@[to_additive pi_norm_lt_iff "The seminorm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if
the norm of each component is."]
lemma pi_norm_lt_iff' (hr : 0 < r) : ‖x‖ < r ↔ ∀ i, ‖x i‖ < r :=
by simp only [←dist_one_right, dist_pi_lt_iff hr, pi.one_apply]
@[to_additive pi_nnnorm_lt_iff]
lemma pi_nnnorm_lt_iff' {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) : ‖x‖₊ < r ↔ ∀ i, ‖x i‖₊ < r := pi_norm_lt_iff' hr
@[to_additive norm_le_pi_norm]
lemma norm_le_pi_norm' (i : ι) : ‖f i‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
(pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' $ norm_nonneg' _).1 le_rfl i
@[to_additive nnnorm_le_pi_nnnorm]
lemma nnnorm_le_pi_nnnorm' (i : ι) : ‖f i‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ := norm_le_pi_norm' _ i
@[to_additive pi_norm_const_le]
lemma pi_norm_const_le' (a : E) : ‖(λ _ : ι, a)‖ ≤ ‖a‖ :=
(pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg' $ norm_nonneg' _).2 $ λ _, le_rfl
@[to_additive pi_nnnorm_const_le]
lemma pi_nnnorm_const_le' (a : E) : ‖(λ _ : ι, a)‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ := pi_norm_const_le' _
@[simp, to_additive pi_norm_const]
lemma pi_norm_const' [nonempty ι] (a : E) : ‖(λ i : ι, a)‖ = ‖a‖ :=
by simpa only [←dist_one_right] using dist_pi_const a 1
@[simp, to_additive pi_nnnorm_const]
lemma pi_nnnorm_const' [nonempty ι] (a : E) : ‖(λ i : ι, a)‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ := nnreal.eq $ pi_norm_const' a
/-- The $L^1$ norm is less than the $L^\infty$ norm scaled by the cardinality. -/
@[to_additive pi.sum_norm_apply_le_norm "The $L^1$ norm is less than the $L^\\infty$ norm scaled by
the cardinality."]
lemma pi.sum_norm_apply_le_norm' : ∑ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ fintype.card ι • ‖f‖ :=
finset.sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ _ $ λ i hi, norm_le_pi_norm' _ i
/-- The $L^1$ norm is less than the $L^\infty$ norm scaled by the cardinality. -/
@[to_additive pi.sum_nnnorm_apply_le_nnnorm "The $L^1$ norm is less than the $L^\\infty$ norm scaled
by the cardinality."]
lemma pi.sum_nnnorm_apply_le_nnnorm' : ∑ i, ‖f i‖₊ ≤ fintype.card ι • ‖f‖₊ :=
nnreal.coe_sum.trans_le $ pi.sum_norm_apply_le_norm' _
end seminormed_group
/-- Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance pi.seminormed_comm_group [Π i, seminormed_comm_group (π i)] :
seminormed_comm_group (Π i, π i) :=
{ ..pi.seminormed_group }
/-- Finite product of normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance pi.normed_group [Π i, normed_group (π i)] : normed_group (Π i, π i) :=
{ ..pi.seminormed_group }
/-- Finite product of normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
@[to_additive "Finite product of seminormed groups, using the sup norm."]
instance pi.normed_comm_group [Π i, normed_comm_group (π i)] : normed_comm_group (Π i, π i) :=
{ ..pi.seminormed_group }
end pi
/-! ### Subgroups of normed groups -/
namespace subgroup
section seminormed_group
variables [seminormed_group E] {s : subgroup E}
/-- A subgroup of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group,
with the restriction of the norm. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group,
with the restriction of the norm."]
instance seminormed_group : seminormed_group s := seminormed_group.induced _ _ s.subtype
/-- If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to
its norm in `E`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm in
`s` is equal to its norm in `E`."]
lemma coe_norm (x : s) : ‖x‖ = ‖(x : E)‖ := rfl
/-- If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to
its norm in `E`.
This is a reversed version of the `simp` lemma `subgroup.coe_norm` for use by `norm_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast, to_additive "If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm
in `s` is equal to its norm in `E`.
This is a reversed version of the `simp` lemma `add_subgroup.coe_norm` for use by `norm_cast`."]
lemma norm_coe {s : subgroup E} (x : s) : ‖(x : E)‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
end seminormed_group
@[to_additive] instance seminormed_comm_group [seminormed_comm_group E] {s : subgroup E} :
seminormed_comm_group s :=
seminormed_comm_group.induced _ _ s.subtype
@[to_additive] instance normed_group [normed_group E] {s : subgroup E} : normed_group s :=
normed_group.induced _ _ s.subtype subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
instance normed_comm_group [normed_comm_group E] {s : subgroup E} : normed_comm_group s :=
normed_comm_group.induced _ _ s.subtype subtype.coe_injective
end subgroup
/-! ### Submodules of normed groups -/
namespace submodule
/-- A submodule of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group, with the restriction of the norm.
-/
-- See note [implicit instance arguments]
instance seminormed_add_comm_group {_ : ring 𝕜} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E}
(s : submodule 𝕜 E) :
seminormed_add_comm_group s :=
seminormed_add_comm_group.induced _ _ s.subtype.to_add_monoid_hom
/-- If `x` is an element of a submodule `s` of a normed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to its
norm in `E`. -/
-- See note [implicit instance arguments].
@[simp] lemma coe_norm {_ : ring 𝕜} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E}
{s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : s) :
‖x‖ = ‖(x : E)‖ := rfl
/-- If `x` is an element of a submodule `s` of a normed group `E`, its norm in `E` is equal to its
norm in `s`.
This is a reversed version of the `simp` lemma `submodule.coe_norm` for use by `norm_cast`. -/
-- See note [implicit instance arguments].
@[norm_cast] lemma norm_coe {_ : ring 𝕜} [seminormed_add_comm_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E}
{s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : s) :
‖(x : E)‖ = ‖x‖ := rfl
/-- A submodule of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm. -/
-- See note [implicit instance arguments].
instance {_ : ring 𝕜} [normed_add_comm_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} (s : submodule 𝕜 E) :
normed_add_comm_group s :=
{ ..submodule.seminormed_add_comm_group s }
end submodule
|
db85a9595f741ba652e7da1346549c532d99ce46 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Syntax.lean | 199105dbc1ad178c69a54fa39e917ffd5def8275 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,268 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.Name
import Lean.Data.Format
/--
A position range inside a string. This type is mostly in combination with syntax trees,
as there might not be a single underlying string in this case that could be used for a `Substring`.
-/
protected structure String.Range where
start : String.Pos
stop : String.Pos
deriving Inhabited, Repr, BEq, Hashable
def String.Range.contains (r : String.Range) (pos : String.Pos) (includeStop := false) : Bool :=
r.start <= pos && (if includeStop then pos <= r.stop else pos < r.stop)
def String.Range.includes (super sub : String.Range) : Bool :=
super.start <= sub.start && super.stop >= sub.stop
namespace Lean
def SourceInfo.updateTrailing (trailing : Substring) : SourceInfo → SourceInfo
| SourceInfo.original leading pos _ endPos => SourceInfo.original leading pos trailing endPos
| info => info
/-! # Syntax AST -/
inductive IsNode : Syntax → Prop where
| mk (info : SourceInfo) (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (args : Array Syntax) : IsNode (Syntax.node info kind args)
def SyntaxNode : Type := {s : Syntax // IsNode s }
def unreachIsNodeMissing {β} (h : IsNode Syntax.missing) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
def unreachIsNodeAtom {β} {info val} (h : IsNode (Syntax.atom info val)) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
def unreachIsNodeIdent {β info rawVal val preresolved} (h : IsNode (Syntax.ident info rawVal val preresolved)) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
def isLitKind (k : SyntaxNodeKind) : Bool :=
k == strLitKind || k == numLitKind || k == charLitKind || k == nameLitKind || k == scientificLitKind
namespace SyntaxNode
@[inline] def getKind (n : SyntaxNode) : SyntaxNodeKind :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node _ k _, _⟩ => k
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom .., h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident .., h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
@[inline] def withArgs {β} (n : SyntaxNode) (fn : Array Syntax → β) : β :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node _ _ args, _⟩ => fn args
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident _ _ _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
@[inline] def getNumArgs (n : SyntaxNode) : Nat :=
withArgs n fun args => args.size
@[inline] def getArg (n : SyntaxNode) (i : Nat) : Syntax :=
withArgs n fun args => args.get! i
@[inline] def getArgs (n : SyntaxNode) : Array Syntax :=
withArgs n fun args => args
@[inline] def modifyArgs (n : SyntaxNode) (fn : Array Syntax → Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node i k args, _⟩ => Syntax.node i k (fn args)
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident _ _ _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
end SyntaxNode
namespace Syntax
def getAtomVal : Syntax → String
| atom _ val => val
| _ => ""
def setAtomVal : Syntax → String → Syntax
| atom info _, v => (atom info v)
| stx, _ => stx
@[inline] def ifNode {β} (stx : Syntax) (hyes : SyntaxNode → β) (hno : Unit → β) : β :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node i k args => hyes ⟨Syntax.node i k args, IsNode.mk i k args⟩
| _ => hno ()
@[inline] def ifNodeKind {β} (stx : Syntax) (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (hyes : SyntaxNode → β) (hno : Unit → β) : β :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node i k args => if k == kind then hyes ⟨Syntax.node i k args, IsNode.mk i k args⟩ else hno ()
| _ => hno ()
def asNode : Syntax → SyntaxNode
| Syntax.node info kind args => ⟨Syntax.node info kind args, IsNode.mk info kind args⟩
| _ => ⟨mkNullNode, IsNode.mk _ _ _⟩
def getIdAt (stx : Syntax) (i : Nat) : Name :=
(stx.getArg i).getId
@[inline] def modifyArgs (stx : Syntax) (fn : Array Syntax → Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx with
| node i k args => node i k (fn args)
| stx => stx
@[inline] def modifyArg (stx : Syntax) (i : Nat) (fn : Syntax → Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx with
| node info k args => node info k (args.modify i fn)
| stx => stx
@[specialize] partial def replaceM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (fn : Syntax → m (Option Syntax)) : Syntax → m (Syntax)
| stx@(node info kind args) => do
match (← fn stx) with
| some stx => return stx
| none => return node info kind (← args.mapM (replaceM fn))
| stx => do
let o ← fn stx
return o.getD stx
@[specialize] partial def rewriteBottomUpM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (fn : Syntax → m (Syntax)) : Syntax → m (Syntax)
| node info kind args => do
let args ← args.mapM (rewriteBottomUpM fn)
fn (node info kind args)
| stx => fn stx
@[inline] def rewriteBottomUp (fn : Syntax → Syntax) (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
Id.run <| stx.rewriteBottomUpM fn
private def updateInfo : SourceInfo → String.Pos → String.Pos → SourceInfo
| SourceInfo.original lead pos trail endPos, leadStart, trailStop =>
SourceInfo.original { lead with startPos := leadStart } pos { trail with stopPos := trailStop } endPos
| info, _, _ => info
private def chooseNiceTrailStop (trail : Substring) : String.Pos :=
trail.startPos + trail.posOf '\n'
/-- Remark: the State `String.Pos` is the `SourceInfo.trailing.stopPos` of the previous token,
or the beginning of the String. -/
@[inline]
private def updateLeadingAux : Syntax → StateM String.Pos (Option Syntax)
| atom info@(SourceInfo.original _ _ trail _) val => do
let trailStop := chooseNiceTrailStop trail
let newInfo := updateInfo info (← get) trailStop
set trailStop
return some (atom newInfo val)
| ident info@(SourceInfo.original _ _ trail _) rawVal val pre => do
let trailStop := chooseNiceTrailStop trail
let newInfo := updateInfo info (← get) trailStop
set trailStop
return some (ident newInfo rawVal val pre)
| _ => pure none
/-- Set `SourceInfo.leading` according to the trailing stop of the preceding token.
The result is a round-tripping syntax tree IF, in the input syntax tree,
* all leading stops, atom contents, and trailing starts are correct
* trailing stops are between the trailing start and the next leading stop.
Remark: after parsing, all `SourceInfo.leading` fields are empty.
The `Syntax` argument is the output produced by the parser for `source`.
This function "fixes" the `source.leading` field.
Additionally, we try to choose "nicer" splits between leading and trailing stops
according to some heuristics so that e.g. comments are associated to the (intuitively)
correct token.
Note that the `SourceInfo.trailing` fields must be correct.
The implementation of this Function relies on this property. -/
def updateLeading : Syntax → Syntax :=
fun stx => (replaceM updateLeadingAux stx).run' 0
partial def updateTrailing (trailing : Substring) : Syntax → Syntax
| Syntax.atom info val => Syntax.atom (info.updateTrailing trailing) val
| Syntax.ident info rawVal val pre => Syntax.ident (info.updateTrailing trailing) rawVal val pre
| n@(Syntax.node info k args) =>
if args.size == 0 then n
else
let i := args.size - 1
let last := updateTrailing trailing args[i]!
let args := args.set! i last;
Syntax.node info k args
| s => s
partial def getTailWithPos : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(atom info _) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| stx@(ident info ..) => info.getPos?.map fun _ => stx
| node SourceInfo.none _ args => args.findSomeRev? getTailWithPos
| stx@(node ..) => stx
| _ => none
open SourceInfo in
/-- Split an `ident` into its dot-separated components while preserving source info.
Macro scopes are first erased. For example, `` `foo.bla.boo._@._hyg.4 `` ↦ `` [`foo, `bla, `boo] ``.
If `nFields` is set, we take that many fields from the end and keep the remaining components
as one name. For example, `` `foo.bla.boo `` with `(nFields := 1)` ↦ `` [`foo.bla, `boo] ``. -/
def identComponents (stx : Syntax) (nFields? : Option Nat := none) : List Syntax :=
match stx with
| ident si@(SourceInfo.original lead pos trail _) rawStr val _ => Id.run do
let val := val.eraseMacroScopes
-- With original info, we assume that `rawStr` represents `val`.
let nameComps := nameComps val nFields?
let rawComps := splitNameLit rawStr
if !rawComps.isEmpty then
let rawComps :=
if let some nFields := nFields? then
let nPrefix := rawComps.length - nFields
let prefixSz := rawComps.take nPrefix |>.foldl (init := 0) fun acc (ss : Substring) => acc + ss.bsize + 1
let prefixSz := prefixSz - 1 -- The last component has no dot
rawStr.extract 0 ⟨prefixSz⟩ :: rawComps.drop nPrefix
else
rawComps
if nameComps.length == rawComps.length then
return nameComps.zip rawComps |>.map fun (id, ss) =>
let off := ss.startPos - rawStr.startPos
let lead := if off == 0 then lead else "".toSubstring
let trail := if ss.stopPos == rawStr.stopPos then trail else "".toSubstring
let info := original lead (pos + off) trail (pos + off + ⟨ss.bsize⟩)
ident info ss id []
-- if re-parsing failed, just give them all the same span
nameComps.map fun n => ident si n.toString.toSubstring n []
| ident si _ val _ =>
let val := val.eraseMacroScopes
/- With non-original info:
- `rawStr` can take all kinds of forms so we only use `val`.
- there is no source extent to offset, so we pass it as-is. -/
nameComps val nFields? |>.map fun n => ident si n.toString.toSubstring n []
| _ => unreachable!
where
nameComps (n : Name) (nFields? : Option Nat) : List Name :=
if let some nFields := nFields? then
let nameComps := n.components
let nPrefix := nameComps.length - nFields
let namePrefix := nameComps.take nPrefix |>.foldl (init := Name.anonymous) fun acc n => acc ++ n
namePrefix :: nameComps.drop nPrefix
else
n.components
structure TopDown where
firstChoiceOnly : Bool
stx : Syntax
/--
`for _ in stx.topDown` iterates through each node and leaf in `stx` top-down, left-to-right.
If `firstChoiceOnly` is `true`, only visit the first argument of each choice node.
-/
def topDown (stx : Syntax) (firstChoiceOnly := false) : TopDown := ⟨firstChoiceOnly, stx⟩
partial instance : ForIn m TopDown Syntax where
forIn := fun ⟨firstChoiceOnly, stx⟩ init f => do
let rec @[specialize] loop stx b [Inhabited (type_of% b)] := do
match (← f stx b) with
| ForInStep.yield b' =>
let mut b := b'
if let Syntax.node _ k args := stx then
if firstChoiceOnly && k == choiceKind then
return ← loop args[0]! b
else
for arg in args do
match (← loop arg b) with
| ForInStep.yield b' => b := b'
| ForInStep.done b' => return ForInStep.done b'
return ForInStep.yield b
| ForInStep.done b => return ForInStep.done b
match (← @loop stx init ⟨init⟩) with
| ForInStep.yield b => return b
| ForInStep.done b => return b
partial def reprint (stx : Syntax) : Option String := do
let mut s := ""
for stx in stx.topDown (firstChoiceOnly := true) do
match stx with
| atom info val => s := s ++ reprintLeaf info val
| ident info rawVal _ _ => s := s ++ reprintLeaf info rawVal.toString
| node _ kind args =>
if kind == choiceKind then
-- this visit the first arg twice, but that should hardly be a problem
-- given that choice nodes are quite rare and small
let s0 ← reprint args[0]!
for arg in args[1:] do
let s' ← reprint arg
guard (s0 == s')
| _ => pure ()
return s
where
reprintLeaf (info : SourceInfo) (val : String) : String :=
match info with
| SourceInfo.original lead _ trail _ => s!"{lead}{val}{trail}"
-- no source info => add gracious amounts of whitespace to definitely separate tokens
-- Note that the proper pretty printer does not use this function.
-- The parser as well always produces source info, so round-tripping is still
-- guaranteed.
| _ => s!" {val} "
def hasMissing (stx : Syntax) : Bool := Id.run do
for stx in stx.topDown do
if stx.isMissing then
return true
return false
def getRange? (stx : Syntax) (canonicalOnly := false) : Option String.Range :=
match stx.getPos? canonicalOnly, stx.getTailPos? canonicalOnly with
| some start, some stop => some { start, stop }
| _, _ => none
/--
Represents a cursor into a syntax tree that can be read, written, and advanced down/up/left/right.
Indices are allowed to be out-of-bound, in which case `cur` is `Syntax.missing`.
If the `Traverser` is used linearly, updates are linear in the `Syntax` object as well.
-/
structure Traverser where
cur : Syntax
parents : Array Syntax
idxs : Array Nat
namespace Traverser
def fromSyntax (stx : Syntax) : Traverser :=
⟨stx, #[], #[]⟩
def setCur (t : Traverser) (stx : Syntax) : Traverser :=
{ t with cur := stx }
/-- Advance to the `idx`-th child of the current node. -/
def down (t : Traverser) (idx : Nat) : Traverser :=
if idx < t.cur.getNumArgs then
{ cur := t.cur.getArg idx, parents := t.parents.push <| t.cur.setArg idx default, idxs := t.idxs.push idx }
else
{ cur := Syntax.missing, parents := t.parents.push t.cur, idxs := t.idxs.push idx }
/-- Advance to the parent of the current node, if any. -/
def up (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
let cur := if t.idxs.back < t.parents.back.getNumArgs then t.parents.back.setArg t.idxs.back t.cur else t.parents.back
{ cur := cur, parents := t.parents.pop, idxs := t.idxs.pop }
else
t
/-- Advance to the left sibling of the current node, if any. -/
def left (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
t.up.down (t.idxs.back - 1)
else
t
/-- Advance to the right sibling of the current node, if any. -/
def right (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
t.up.down (t.idxs.back + 1)
else
t
end Traverser
/-- Monad class that gives read/write access to a `Traverser`. -/
class MonadTraverser (m : Type → Type) where
st : MonadState Traverser m
namespace MonadTraverser
variable {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [t : MonadTraverser m]
def getCur : m Syntax := Traverser.cur <$> t.st.get
def setCur (stx : Syntax) : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.setCur stx)
def goDown (idx : Nat) : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.down idx)
def goUp : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.up)
def goLeft : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.left)
def goRight : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.right)
def getIdx : m Nat := do
let st ← t.st.get
return st.idxs.back?.getD 0
end MonadTraverser
end Syntax
namespace SyntaxNode
@[inline] def getIdAt (n : SyntaxNode) (i : Nat) : Name :=
(n.getArg i).getId
end SyntaxNode
def mkListNode (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkNullNode args
namespace Syntax
-- quotation node kinds are formed from a unique quotation name plus "quot"
def isQuot : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node _ (Name.str _ "quot") _ => true
| Syntax.node _ `Lean.Parser.Term.dynamicQuot _ => true
| _ => false
def getQuotContent (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
let stx := if stx.getNumArgs == 1 then stx[0] else stx
if stx.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.dynamicQuot then
stx[3]
else
stx[1]
-- antiquotation node kinds are formed from the original node kind (if any) plus "antiquot"
def isAntiquot : Syntax → Bool
| .node _ (.str _ "antiquot") _ => true
| _ => false
def isAntiquots (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
stx.isAntiquot || (stx.isOfKind choiceKind && stx.getNumArgs > 0 && stx.getArgs.all isAntiquot)
def getCanonicalAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
if stx.isOfKind choiceKind then
stx[0]
else
stx
def mkAntiquotNode (kind : Name) (term : Syntax) (nesting := 0) (name : Option String := none) (isPseudoKind := false) : Syntax :=
let nesting := mkNullNode (mkArray nesting (mkAtom "$"))
let term :=
if term.isIdent then term
else if term.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.hole then term[0]
else mkNode `antiquotNestedExpr #[mkAtom "(", term, mkAtom ")"]
let name := match name with
| some name => mkNode `antiquotName #[mkAtom ":", mkAtom name]
| none => mkNullNode
mkNode (kind ++ (if isPseudoKind then `pseudo else Name.anonymous) ++ `antiquot) #[mkAtom "$", nesting, term, name]
-- Antiquotations can be escaped as in `$$x`, which is useful for nesting macros. Also works for antiquotation splices.
def isEscapedAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
!stx[1].getArgs.isEmpty
-- Also works for antiquotation splices.
def unescapeAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
if isAntiquot stx then
stx.setArg 1 <| mkNullNode stx[1].getArgs.pop
else
stx
-- Also works for token antiquotations.
def getAntiquotTerm (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
let e := if stx.isAntiquot then stx[2] else stx[3]
if e.isIdent then e
else if e.isAtom then mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.hole #[e]
else
-- `e` is from `"(" >> termParser >> ")"`
e[1]
/-- Return kind of parser expected at this antiquotation, and whether it is a "pseudo" kind (see `mkAntiquot`). -/
def antiquotKind? : Syntax → Option (SyntaxNodeKind × Bool)
| .node _ (.str (.str k "pseudo") "antiquot") _ => (k, true)
| .node _ (.str k "antiquot") _ => (k, false)
| _ => none
def antiquotKinds (stx : Syntax) : List (SyntaxNodeKind × Bool) :=
if stx.isOfKind choiceKind then
stx.getArgs.filterMap antiquotKind? |>.toList
else
match antiquotKind? stx with
| some stx => [stx]
| none => []
-- An "antiquotation splice" is something like `$[...]?` or `$[...]*`.
def antiquotSpliceKind? : Syntax → Option SyntaxNodeKind
| .node _ (.str k "antiquot_scope") _ => some k
| _ => none
def isAntiquotSplice (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
antiquotSpliceKind? stx |>.isSome
def getAntiquotSpliceContents (stx : Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
stx[3].getArgs
-- `$[..],*` or `$x,*` ~> `,*`
def getAntiquotSpliceSuffix (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
if stx.isAntiquotSplice then
stx[5]
else
stx[1]
def mkAntiquotSpliceNode (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (contents : Array Syntax) (suffix : String) (nesting := 0) : Syntax :=
let nesting := mkNullNode (mkArray nesting (mkAtom "$"))
mkNode (kind ++ `antiquot_splice) #[mkAtom "$", nesting, mkAtom "[", mkNullNode contents, mkAtom "]", mkAtom suffix]
-- `$x,*` etc.
def antiquotSuffixSplice? : Syntax → Option SyntaxNodeKind
| .node _ (.str k "antiquot_suffix_splice") _ => some k
| _ => none
def isAntiquotSuffixSplice (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
antiquotSuffixSplice? stx |>.isSome
-- `$x` in the example above
def getAntiquotSuffixSpliceInner (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
stx[0]
def mkAntiquotSuffixSpliceNode (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (inner : Syntax) (suffix : String) : Syntax :=
mkNode (kind ++ `antiquot_suffix_splice) #[inner, mkAtom suffix]
def isTokenAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
stx.isOfKind `token_antiquot
def isAnyAntiquot (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
stx.isAntiquot || stx.isAntiquotSplice || stx.isAntiquotSuffixSplice || stx.isTokenAntiquot
/-- List of `Syntax` nodes in which each succeeding element is the parent of
the current. The associated index is the index of the preceding element in the
list of children of the current element. -/
protected abbrev Stack := List (Syntax × Nat)
/-- Return stack of syntax nodes satisfying `visit`, starting with such a node that also fulfills `accept` (default "is leaf"), and ending with the root. -/
partial def findStack? (root : Syntax) (visit : Syntax → Bool) (accept : Syntax → Bool := fun stx => !stx.hasArgs) : Option Syntax.Stack :=
if visit root then go [] root else none
where
go (stack : Syntax.Stack) (stx : Syntax) : Option Syntax.Stack := Id.run do
if accept stx then
return (stx, 0) :: stack -- the first index is arbitrary as there is no preceding element
for i in [0:stx.getNumArgs] do
if visit stx[i] then
if let some stack := go ((stx, i) :: stack) stx[i] then
return stack
return none
/-- Compare the `SyntaxNodeKind`s in `pattern` to those of the `Syntax`
elements in `stack`. Return `false` if `stack` is shorter than `pattern`. -/
def Stack.matches (stack : Syntax.Stack) (pattern : List $ Option SyntaxNodeKind) : Bool :=
stack.length >= pattern.length &&
(stack
|>.zipWith (fun (s, _) p => p |>.map (s.isOfKind ·) |>.getD true) pattern
|>.all id)
end Syntax
end Lean
|
efb57ab12c7433dfaa57045c485b3fb454cf0491 | 4efff1f47634ff19e2f786deadd394270a59ecd2 | /src/data/lazy_list2.lean | 03029980b52e3834be163680936fc298e6fd84e1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | agjftucker/mathlib | d634cd0d5256b6325e3c55bb7fb2403548371707 | 87fe50de17b00af533f72a102d0adefe4a2285e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,378,131,941 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 160,748,509 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,141,789,000 | 1,544,141,789,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,527 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
Traversable instance for lazy_lists.
-/
import control.traversable.equiv
import control.traversable.instances
import data.lazy_list
universes u
namespace thunk
/-- Creates a thunk with a (non-lazy) constant value. -/
def mk {α} (x : α) : thunk α := λ _, x
instance {α : Type u} [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (thunk α) | a b :=
have a = b ↔ a () = b (), from ⟨by cc, by intro; ext x; cases x; assumption⟩,
by rw this; apply_instance
end thunk
namespace lazy_list
open function
def list_equiv_lazy_list (α : Type*) : list α ≃ lazy_list α :=
{ to_fun := lazy_list.of_list,
inv_fun := lazy_list.to_list,
right_inv := by { intro, induction x, refl, simp! [*],
ext, cases x, refl },
left_inv := by { intro, induction x, refl, simp! [*] } }
instance {α : Type u} : inhabited (lazy_list α) := ⟨nil⟩
instance {α : Type u} [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (lazy_list α)
| nil nil := is_true rfl
| (cons x xs) (cons y ys) :=
if h : x = y then
match decidable_eq (xs ()) (ys ()) with
| is_false h2 := is_false (by intro; cc)
| is_true h2 :=
have xs = ys, by ext u; cases u; assumption,
is_true (by cc)
end
else
is_false (by intro; cc)
| nil (cons _ _) := is_false (by cc)
| (cons _ _) nil := is_false (by cc)
protected def traverse {m : Type u → Type u} [applicative m] {α β : Type u}
(f : α → m β) : lazy_list α → m (lazy_list β)
| lazy_list.nil := pure lazy_list.nil
| (lazy_list.cons x xs) := lazy_list.cons <$> f x <*> (thunk.mk <$> traverse (xs ()))
instance : traversable lazy_list :=
{ map := @lazy_list.traverse id _,
traverse := @lazy_list.traverse }
instance : is_lawful_traversable lazy_list :=
begin
apply equiv.is_lawful_traversable' list_equiv_lazy_list;
intros ; resetI; ext,
{ induction x, refl,
simp! [equiv.map,functor.map] at *,
simp [*], refl, },
{ induction x, refl,
simp! [equiv.map,functor.map_const] at *,
simp [*], refl, },
{ induction x,
{ simp! [traversable.traverse,equiv.traverse] with functor_norm, refl },
simp! [equiv.map,functor.map_const,traversable.traverse] at *, rw x_ih,
dsimp [list_equiv_lazy_list,equiv.traverse,to_list,traversable.traverse,list.traverse],
simp! with functor_norm, refl },
end
/-- `init xs`, if `xs` non-empty, drops the last element of the list.
Otherwise, return the empty list. -/
def init {α} : lazy_list α → lazy_list α
| lazy_list.nil := lazy_list.nil
| (lazy_list.cons x xs) :=
let xs' := xs () in
match xs' with
| lazy_list.nil := lazy_list.nil
| (lazy_list.cons _ _) := lazy_list.cons x (init xs')
end
/-- `interleave xs ys` creates a list where elements of `xs` and `ys` alternate. -/
def interleave {α} : lazy_list α → lazy_list α → lazy_list α
| lazy_list.nil xs := xs
| a@(lazy_list.cons x xs) lazy_list.nil := a
| (lazy_list.cons x xs) (lazy_list.cons y ys) :=
lazy_list.cons x (lazy_list.cons y (interleave (xs ()) (ys ())))
/-- `interleave_all (xs::ys::zs::xss)` creates a list where elements of `xs`, `ys`
and `zs` and the rest alternate. Every other element of the resulting list is taken from
`xs`, every fourth is taken from `ys`, every eighth is taken from `zs` and so on. -/
def interleave_all {α} : list (lazy_list α) → lazy_list α
| [] := lazy_list.nil
| (x :: xs) := interleave x (interleave_all xs)
end lazy_list
|
4a4fd17e873b24406b12693e15c29973102e47a1 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /stage0/src/Init/Lean/Compiler/IR/ExpandResetReuse.lean | 081f71640fba0fd6262e34cd41c5fa8a182f893f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,782 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.State
import Init.Control.Reader
import Init.Data.Nat
import Init.Lean.Compiler.IR.CompilerM
import Init.Lean.Compiler.IR.NormIds
import Init.Lean.Compiler.IR.FreeVars
namespace Lean
namespace IR
namespace ExpandResetReuse
/- Mapping from variable to projections -/
abbrev ProjMap := HashMap VarId Expr
namespace CollectProjMap
abbrev Collector := ProjMap → ProjMap
@[inline] def collectVDecl (x : VarId) (v : Expr) : Collector :=
fun m => match v with
| Expr.proj _ _ => m.insert x v
| Expr.sproj _ _ _ => m.insert x v
| Expr.uproj _ _ => m.insert x v
| _ => m
partial def collectFnBody : FnBody → Collector
| FnBody.vdecl x _ v b => collectVDecl x v ∘ collectFnBody b
| FnBody.jdecl _ _ v b => collectFnBody v ∘ collectFnBody b
| FnBody.case _ _ _ alts => fun s => alts.foldl (fun s alt => collectFnBody alt.body s) s
| e => if e.isTerminal then id else collectFnBody e.body
end CollectProjMap
/- Create a mapping from variables to projections.
This function assumes variable ids have been normalized -/
def mkProjMap (d : Decl) : ProjMap :=
match d with
| Decl.fdecl _ _ _ b => CollectProjMap.collectFnBody b {}
| _ => {}
structure Context :=
(projMap : ProjMap)
/- Return true iff `x` is consumed in all branches of the current block.
Here consumption means the block contains a `dec x` or `reuse x ...`. -/
partial def consumed (x : VarId) : FnBody → Bool
| FnBody.vdecl _ _ v b =>
match v with
| Expr.reuse y _ _ _ => x == y || consumed b
| _ => consumed b
| FnBody.dec y _ _ _ b => x == y || consumed b
| FnBody.case _ _ _ alts => alts.all $ fun alt => consumed alt.body
| e => !e.isTerminal && consumed e.body
abbrev Mask := Array (Option VarId)
/- Auxiliary function for eraseProjIncFor -/
partial def eraseProjIncForAux (y : VarId) : Array FnBody → Mask → Array FnBody → Array FnBody × Mask
| bs, mask, keep =>
let done (_ : Unit) := (bs ++ keep.reverse, mask);
let keepInstr (b : FnBody) := eraseProjIncForAux bs.pop mask (keep.push b);
if bs.size < 2 then done ()
else
let b := bs.back;
match b with
| (FnBody.vdecl _ _ (Expr.sproj _ _ _) _) => keepInstr b
| (FnBody.vdecl _ _ (Expr.uproj _ _) _) => keepInstr b
| (FnBody.inc z n c p _) =>
if n == 0 then done () else
let b' := bs.get! (bs.size - 2);
match b' with
| (FnBody.vdecl w _ (Expr.proj i x) _) =>
if w == z && y == x then
/- Found
```
let z := proj[i] y;
inc z n c
```
We keep `proj`, and `inc` when `n > 1`
-/
let bs := bs.pop.pop;
let mask := mask.set! i (some z);
let keep := keep.push b';
let keep := if n == 1 then keep else keep.push (FnBody.inc z (n-1) c p FnBody.nil);
eraseProjIncForAux bs mask keep
else done ()
| other => done ()
| other => done ()
/- Try to erase `inc` instructions on projections of `y` occurring in the tail of `bs`.
Return the updated `bs` and a bit mask specifying which `inc`s have been removed. -/
def eraseProjIncFor (n : Nat) (y : VarId) (bs : Array FnBody) : Array FnBody × Mask :=
eraseProjIncForAux y bs (mkArray n none) #[]
/- Replace `reuse x ctor ...` with `ctor ...`, and remoce `dec x` -/
partial def reuseToCtor (x : VarId) : FnBody → FnBody
| FnBody.dec y n c p b =>
if x == y then b -- n must be 1 since `x := reset ...`
else FnBody.dec y n c p (reuseToCtor b)
| FnBody.vdecl z t v b =>
match v with
| Expr.reuse y c u xs =>
if x == y then FnBody.vdecl z t (Expr.ctor c xs) b
else FnBody.vdecl z t v (reuseToCtor b)
| _ =>
FnBody.vdecl z t v (reuseToCtor b)
| FnBody.case tid y yType alts =>
let alts := alts.map $ fun alt => alt.modifyBody reuseToCtor;
FnBody.case tid y yType alts
| e =>
if e.isTerminal then e
else
let (instr, b) := e.split;
let b := reuseToCtor b;
instr.setBody b
/-
replace
```
x := reset y; b
```
with
```
inc z_1; ...; inc z_i; dec y; b'
```
where `z_i`'s are the variables in `mask`,
and `b'` is `b` where we removed `dec x` and replaced `reuse x ctor_i ...` with `ctor_i ...`.
-/
def mkSlowPath (x y : VarId) (mask : Mask) (b : FnBody) : FnBody :=
let b := reuseToCtor x b;
let b := FnBody.dec y 1 true false b;
mask.foldl
(fun b m => match m with
| some z => FnBody.inc z 1 true false b
| none => b)
b
abbrev M := ReaderT Context (StateM Nat)
def mkFresh : M VarId :=
modifyGet $ fun n => ({ idx := n }, n + 1)
def releaseUnreadFields (y : VarId) (mask : Mask) (b : FnBody) : M FnBody :=
mask.size.foldM
(fun i b =>
match mask.get! i with
| some _ => pure b -- code took ownership of this field
| none => do
fld ← mkFresh;
pure (FnBody.vdecl fld IRType.object (Expr.proj i y) (FnBody.dec fld 1 true false b)))
b
def setFields (y : VarId) (zs : Array Arg) (b : FnBody) : FnBody :=
zs.size.fold
(fun i b => FnBody.set y i (zs.get! i) b)
b
/- Given `set x[i] := y`, return true iff `y := proj[i] x` -/
def isSelfSet (ctx : Context) (x : VarId) (i : Nat) (y : Arg) : Bool :=
match y with
| Arg.var y =>
match ctx.projMap.find? y with
| some (Expr.proj j w) => j == i && w == x
| _ => false
| _ => false
/- Given `uset x[i] := y`, return true iff `y := uproj[i] x` -/
def isSelfUSet (ctx : Context) (x : VarId) (i : Nat) (y : VarId) : Bool :=
match ctx.projMap.find? y with
| some (Expr.uproj j w) => j == i && w == x
| _ => false
/- Given `sset x[n, i] := y`, return true iff `y := sproj[n, i] x` -/
def isSelfSSet (ctx : Context) (x : VarId) (n : Nat) (i : Nat) (y : VarId) : Bool :=
match ctx.projMap.find? y with
| some (Expr.sproj m j w) => n == m && j == i && w == x
| _ => false
/- Remove unnecessary `set/uset/sset` operations -/
partial def removeSelfSet (ctx : Context) : FnBody → FnBody
| FnBody.set x i y b =>
if isSelfSet ctx x i y then removeSelfSet b
else FnBody.set x i y (removeSelfSet b)
| FnBody.uset x i y b =>
if isSelfUSet ctx x i y then removeSelfSet b
else FnBody.uset x i y (removeSelfSet b)
| FnBody.sset x n i y t b =>
if isSelfSSet ctx x n i y then removeSelfSet b
else FnBody.sset x n i y t (removeSelfSet b)
| FnBody.case tid y yType alts =>
let alts := alts.map $ fun alt => alt.modifyBody removeSelfSet;
FnBody.case tid y yType alts
| e =>
if e.isTerminal then e
else
let (instr, b) := e.split;
let b := removeSelfSet b;
instr.setBody b
partial def reuseToSet (ctx : Context) (x y : VarId) : FnBody → FnBody
| FnBody.dec z n c p b =>
if x == z then FnBody.del y b
else FnBody.dec z n c p (reuseToSet b)
| FnBody.vdecl z t v b =>
match v with
| Expr.reuse w c u zs =>
if x == w then
let b := setFields y zs (b.replaceVar z y);
let b := if u then FnBody.setTag y c.cidx b else b;
removeSelfSet ctx b
else FnBody.vdecl z t v (reuseToSet b)
| _ => FnBody.vdecl z t v (reuseToSet b)
| FnBody.case tid y yType alts =>
let alts := alts.map $ fun alt => alt.modifyBody reuseToSet;
FnBody.case tid y yType alts
| e =>
if e.isTerminal then e
else
let (instr, b) := e.split;
let b := reuseToSet b;
instr.setBody b
/-
replace
```
x := reset y; b
```
with
```
let f_i_1 := proj[i_1] y;
...
let f_i_k := proj[i_k] y;
b'
```
where `i_j`s are the field indexes
that the code did not touch immediately before the reset.
That is `mask[j] == none`.
`b'` is `b` where `y` `dec x` is replaced with `del y`,
and `z := reuse x ctor_i ws; F` is replaced with
`set x i ws[i]` operations, and we replace `z` with `x` in `F`
-/
def mkFastPath (x y : VarId) (mask : Mask) (b : FnBody) : M FnBody := do
ctx ← read;
let b := reuseToSet ctx x y b;
releaseUnreadFields y mask b
-- Expand `bs; x := reset[n] y; b`
partial def expand (mainFn : FnBody → Array FnBody → M FnBody)
(bs : Array FnBody) (x : VarId) (n : Nat) (y : VarId) (b : FnBody) : M FnBody := do
let bOld := FnBody.vdecl x IRType.object (Expr.reset n y) b;
let (bs, mask) := eraseProjIncFor n y bs;
/- Remark: we may be duplicting variable/JP indices. That is, `bSlow` and `bFast` may
have duplicate indices. We run `normalizeIds` to fix the ids after we have expand them. -/
let bSlow := mkSlowPath x y mask b;
bFast ← mkFastPath x y mask b;
/- We only optimize recursively the fast. -/
bFast ← mainFn bFast #[];
c ← mkFresh;
let b := FnBody.vdecl c IRType.uint8 (Expr.isShared y) (mkIf c bSlow bFast);
pure $ reshape bs b
partial def searchAndExpand : FnBody → Array FnBody → M FnBody
| d@(FnBody.vdecl x t (Expr.reset n y) b), bs =>
if consumed x b then do
expand searchAndExpand bs x n y b
else
searchAndExpand b (push bs d)
| FnBody.jdecl j xs v b, bs => do
v ← searchAndExpand v #[];
searchAndExpand b (push bs (FnBody.jdecl j xs v FnBody.nil))
| FnBody.case tid x xType alts, bs => do
alts ← alts.mapM $ fun alt => alt.mmodifyBody $ fun b => searchAndExpand b #[];
pure $ reshape bs (FnBody.case tid x xType alts)
| b, bs =>
if b.isTerminal then pure $ reshape bs b
else searchAndExpand b.body (push bs b)
def main (d : Decl) : Decl :=
match d with
| (Decl.fdecl f xs t b) =>
let m := mkProjMap d;
let nextIdx := d.maxIndex + 1;
let b := (searchAndExpand b #[] { projMap := m }).run' nextIdx;
Decl.fdecl f xs t b
| d => d
end ExpandResetReuse
/-- (Try to) expand `reset` and `reuse` instructions. -/
def Decl.expandResetReuse (d : Decl) : Decl :=
(ExpandResetReuse.main d).normalizeIds
end IR
end Lean
|
80a0213ff31651b47d2e7cb3d2b4e6e967693fed | b392eb79fb36952401156496daa60628ccb07438 | /MathPort/Run.lean | 53513a3d10050988aa1821715ba28647b6654ac7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AurelienSaue/mathportsource | d9eabe74e3ab7774baa6a10a6dc8d4855ff92266 | 1a164e4fff7204c522c1f4ecc5024fd909be3b0b | refs/heads/master | 1,685,214,377,305 | 1,623,621,223,000 | 1,623,621,223,000 | 364,191,042 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,819 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Daniel Selsam
-/
import MathPort.Basic
import MathPort.Rules
import MathPort.ParseExport
import MathPort.ProcessActionItem
import MathPort.Path
import Lean
import Std.Data.HashMap
import Std.Data.HashSet
open Lean Lean.Meta
open Std (HashMap HashSet)
namespace MathPort
namespace Run -- TODO: better name. runAll? schedule?
abbrev Job := Task (Except IO.Error Unit)
instance : Inhabited Job := ⟨⟨pure ()⟩⟩
structure Context where
proofs : Bool
source : Bool
structure State where
path2task : HashMap String Job := {}
abbrev RunM := ReaderT Context (StateRefT State IO)
-- TODO: weave
def rulesFilename := "rules.txt"
def parseTLeanImports (target : Path34) : IO (List Path34) := do
let line ← IO.FS.withFile target.toTLean IO.FS.Mode.read fun h => h.getLine
let tokens := line.trim.splitOn " " |>.toArray
let nImports := tokens[1].toNat!
let mut paths := #[]
for i in [:nImports] do
if tokens[2+2*i+1] ≠ "-1" then throw $ IO.userError "found relative import!"
let dotPath : DotPath := ⟨tokens[2+2*i]⟩
paths := paths.push $ ← resolveDotPath dotPath
return paths.toList
def bindTasks (tasks : List Job) (k : Unit → IO Job) : IO Job :=
match tasks with
| [] => k ()
| task::tasks => IO.bindTask task λ
| Except.ok _ => bindTasks tasks k
| Except.error err => throw err
@[implementedBy withImportModules]
constant withImportModulesConst {α : Type} (imports : List Import) (opts : Options) (trustLevel : UInt32 := 0) (x : Environment → IO α) : IO α :=
throw $ IO.userError "NYI"
def initialComment (hsource3 : IO.FS.Handle) : PortM String := do
println! "finding initial comment"
let mut res := ""
let mut line := (← hsource3.getLine)
if not $ line.startsWith "/-" then
return ""
res := res ++ line
while not $ line.endsWith "-/\n" do
line := (← hsource3.getLine)
res := res ++ line
println! "initial comment: {line}"
modify λ s => { s with currLine := s.currLine + 1}
return res
def processSource3Lines (hsource3 : IO.FS.Handle) (startLine : Nat) (endLine : Nat): PortM String := do
let mut res := ""
println! "processing source lines {startLine} to {endLine}"
for i in [startLine : endLine] do
println! "printligne {i}"
let line ← hsource3.getLine
if line.startsWith "--" then
println! "comment '{line}'"
res := res ++ line ++ "\n"
if (← get).docstring || line.startsWith "/--" then
println! "docstring '{line}'"
modify λ s => { s with docstring := true}
res := res ++ line
else if (← get).comment || line.startsWith "/-" then
println! "comment '{line}'"
modify λ s => { s with comment := true}
res := res ++ line
if (← get).comment && line.endsWith "-/\n" then
println! "end of comment"
modify λ s => { s with comment := false}
res := res ++"\n"
else if (← get).docstring && line.endsWith "-/\n" then
println! "end of docstring"
modify λ s => { s with docstring := false}
res := res
if line.startsWith "namespace" then
match line.splitOn " " with
| ["namespace", name] => do
modify λ s => { s with currNamespace := s.currNamespace.append name.toName}
res := res ++ ( "namespace " ++ name ++ "\n\n")
println! "NAMESPACE {name} -> currNamespace = {(← get).currNamespace}"
| _ => println! "Unrecognized namespace pattern: {line}"
if line.startsWith "end" then
match line.splitOn " " with
| ["end", name] => do
if name.toName.isSuffixOf (← get).currNamespace then
modify λ s => { s with currNamespace := s.currNamespace.removeSuffix name.toName}
res := res ++ ( "end " ++ name ++ "\n\n")
println! "END {name} -> currNamespace = {(← get).currNamespace}"
else
println! "END {name} not a prefix of {(← get).currNamespace}"
| _ => ()
return res
def genOLeanFor (proofs : Bool) (source : Bool) (target : Path34) : IO Unit := do
println! s!"[genOLeanFor] START {target.mrpath.path}"
createDirectoriesIfNotExists target.toLean4olean
println! "directories created"
let imports : List Import := [{ module := `Init : Import }, { module := `PrePort : Import }]
++ (← parseTLeanImports target).map fun path => { module := parseName path.toLean4dot }
-- NEW
let hsource3 : IO.FS.Handle ← IO.FS.Handle.mk target.toLean3Source IO.FS.Mode.read false
let hsource4 : IO.FS.Handle ← IO.FS.Handle.mk target.toLean4autolean IO.FS.Mode.write false
-- if source then
-- println! "Processing imports"
-- for import in imports do
-- hsource4.putStr "import "
-- hsource4.putStrLn $ toString import.module
-- println! "IMPORT {modPathToFilePath import.module}"
-- -- if importPostport then
-- -- hsource4.putStrLn "import PostPort"
-- hsource4.putStr "\n"
withImportModulesConst imports (opts := {}) (trustLevel := 0) $ λ env₀ => do
let env₀ := env₀.setMainModule target.mrpath.toDotPath.path
let _ ← PortM.toIO (ctx := { proofs := proofs, source := source, path := target }) (env := env₀) do
parseRules rulesFilename
IO.FS.withFile target.toTLean IO.FS.Mode.read fun h => do
let _ ← h.getLine -- discard imports
let mut actionItems := #[]
while (not (← h.isEof)) do
let line := (← h.getLine).dropRightWhile λ c => c == '\n'
if line == "" then continue
actionItems := actionItems.append (← processLine line).toArray
if source then
for actionItem in actionItems do
fillDeclInfo actionItem
fillUniverses actionItem
findAutoGenerated
hsource4.putStr (← initialComment hsource3)
println! "Processing imports"
for import in imports do
if not $ toString import.module = "Init" then
hsource4.putStr "import "
hsource4.putStrLn $ toString import.module
println! "IMPORT {modPathToFilePath import.module}"
if importPostport then
hsource4.putStrLn "import PostPort"
hsource4.putStr "\n"
println! "Processing levelParams"
if declareUniverses then
let allLevelParams ← (← get).«universes»
if not allLevelParams.isEmpty then
hsource4.putStr "universes "
for u in allLevelParams do
hsource4.putStr $ toString u ++ " "
hsource4.putStr "\n\n"
hsource4.putStr "namespace Mathlib\n\n"
let firstLine ← findFirstLine
hsource4.putStr (← processSource3Lines hsource3 (← get).currLine firstLine)
modify λ s => { s with currLine := firstLine}
let mut isIrreducible : Bool := false
let mut comment := false
let mut doneImports := false
for actionItem in actionItems do
processActionItem actionItem
if source then
let newPos ← newPos actionItem
println! "newPos: {newPos}"
hsource4.putStr (← processSource3Lines hsource3 (← get).currLine newPos)
let sourceStr ← actionItemToSource actionItem
modify λ s => { s with currLine := newPos}
hsource4.putStr sourceStr
if source then
hsource4.putStr "end Mathlib"
let env ← getEnv
writeModule env target.toLean4olean
println! s!"[genOLeanFor] END {target.mrpath.path}"
pure ()
partial def visit (depth : Nat) (target : Path34) : RunM Job := do
match (← get).path2task.find? target.toTLean with
| some task => pure task
| none => do
if (← IO.fileExists target.toLean4autolean) && (← IO.fileExists target.toLean4olean) && depth > 0 then
IO.asTask (pure ())
else
let paths ← parseTLeanImports target
let cjobs ← paths.mapM (visit (depth + 1))
let job : Job ← bindTasks cjobs λ _ => IO.asTask $ genOLeanFor (← read).proofs (← read).source target
modify λ s => { s with path2task := s.path2task.insert target.toTLean job }
pure job
end Run
open Run
unsafe def run (proofs : Bool) (source : Bool) (target : Path34) : IO Unit := do
initSearchPath s!"{Lean4LibPath}:{Lib4Path}"
let job ← (visit 0 target) { proofs := proofs, source := source } |>.run' (s := {})
let result ← IO.wait job
match result with
| Except.ok _ => pure ()
| Except.error err => throw err
end MathPort
|
802a566c8cf5a4b2a298593fc9161d086dde419a | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/combinatorics/pigeonhole.lean | 7c3655380f457456008c48c402924fb6c499ac69 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,197 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.set.finite
import data.nat.modeq
import algebra.big_operators.order
/-!
# Pigeonhole principles
Given pigeons (possibly infinitely many) in pigeonholes, the
pigeonhole principle states that, if there are more pigeons than
pigeonholes, then there is a pigeonhole with two or more pigeons.
There are a few variations on this statement, and the conclusion can
be made stronger depending on how many pigeons you know you might
have.
The basic statements of the pigeonhole principle appear in the
following locations:
* `data.finset.basic` has `finset.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to`
* `data.fintype.basic` has `fintype.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt`
* `data.fintype.basic` has `fintype.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite`
* `data.fintype.basic` has `fintype.exists_infinite_fiber`
* `data.set.finite` has `set.infinite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_maps_to`
This module gives access to these pigeonhole principles along with 20 more.
The versions vary by:
* using a function between `fintype`s or a function between possibly infinite types restricted to
`finset`s;
* counting pigeons by a general weight function (`∑ x in s, w x`) or by heads (`finset.card s`);
* using strict or non-strict inequalities;
* establishing upper or lower estimate on the number (or the total weight) of the pigeons in one
pigeonhole;
* in case when we count pigeons by some weight function `w` and consider a function `f` between
`finset`s `s` and `t`, we can either assume that each pigeon is in one of the pigeonholes
(`∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t`), or assume that for `y ∉ t`, the total weight of the pigeons in this
pigeonhole `∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x` is nonpositive or nonnegative depending on
the inequality we are proving.
Lemma names follow `mathlib` convention (e.g.,
`finset.exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum`); "pigeonhole principle" is mentioned in the
docstrings instead of the names.
## See also
* `ordinal.infinite_pigeonhole`: pigeonhole principle for cardinals, formulated using cofinality;
* `measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure`,
`measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure`: pigeonhole principle in a
measure space.
## TODO
The `_nsmul` lemmas could be generalized from `linear_ordered_comm_ring` to
`linear_ordered_comm_semiring` if the latter existed (or some combination of
`covariant`/`contravariant` classes once the refactor has gone deep enough). This would allow
deriving the `_mul` lemmas from the `_nsmul` ones.
## Tags
pigeonhole principle
-/
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {M : Type w} [decidable_eq β]
open nat
open_locale big_operators
namespace finset
variables {s : finset α} {t : finset β} {f : α → β} {w : α → M} {b : M} {n : ℕ}
/-!
### The pigeonhole principles on `finset`s, pigeons counted by weight
In this section we prove the following version of the pigeonhole principle: if the total weight of a
finite set of pigeons is greater than `n • b`, and they are sorted into `n` pigeonholes, then for
some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole is greater than `b`, and a few
variations of this theorem.
The principle is formalized in the following way, see
`finset.exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum`: if `f : α → β` is a function which maps all
elements of `s : finset α` to `t : finset β` and `card t • b < ∑ x in s, w x`, where `w : α → M` is
a weight function taking values in a `linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid`, then for
some `y ∈ t`, the sum of the weights of all `x ∈ s` such that `f x = y` is greater than `b`.
There are a few bits we can change in this theorem:
* reverse all inequalities, with obvious adjustments to the name;
* replace the assumption `∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t` with
`∀ y ∉ t, (∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) ≤ 0`,
and replace `of_maps_to` with `of_sum_fiber_nonpos` in the name;
* use non-strict inequalities assuming `t` is nonempty.
We can do all these variations independently, so we have eight versions of the theorem.
-/
section
variables [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid M]
/-!
#### Strict inequality versions
-/
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, strict inequality version:
if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is greater than `n • b`, and they are sorted into
`n` pigeonholes, then for some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole is
greater than `b`. -/
lemma exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hb : t.card • b < ∑ x in s, w x) :
∃ y ∈ t, b < ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x :=
exists_lt_of_sum_lt $ by simpa only [sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to hf, sum_const]
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, strict inequality version:
if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is less than `n • b`, and they are sorted into `n`
pigeonholes, then for some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole is less
than `b`. -/
lemma exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_maps_to_of_sum_lt_nsmul (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hb : (∑ x in s, w x) < t.card • b) :
∃ y ∈ t, (∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) < b :=
@exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum α β Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf hb
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, strict inequality version:
if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is greater than `n • b`, they are sorted into some
pigeonholes, and for all but `n` pigeonholes the total weight of the pigeons there is nonpositive,
then for at least one of these `n` pigeonholes, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole
is greater than `b`. -/
lemma exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_lt_sum
(ht : ∀ y ∉ t, (∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) ≤ 0) (hb : t.card • b < ∑ x in s, w x) :
∃ y ∈ t, b < ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x :=
exists_lt_of_sum_lt $
calc (∑ y in t, b) < ∑ x in s, w x : by simpa
... ≤ ∑ y in t, ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x :
sum_le_sum_fiberwise_of_sum_fiber_nonpos ht
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, strict inequality version:
if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is less than `n • b`, they are sorted into some
pigeonholes, and for all but `n` pigeonholes the total weight of the pigeons there is nonnegative,
then for at least one of these `n` pigeonholes, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole
is less than `b`. -/
lemma exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_lt_nsmul
(ht : ∀ y ∉ t, (0:M) ≤ ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) (hb : (∑ x in s, w x) < t.card • b) :
∃ y ∈ t, (∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) < b :=
@exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_lt_sum α β Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ht hb
/-!
#### Non-strict inequality versions
-/
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, non-strict inequality
version: if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is greater than or equal to `n • b`, and
they are sorted into `n > 0` pigeonholes, then for some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons
in this pigeonhole is greater than or equal to `b`. -/
lemma exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.nonempty)
(hb : t.card • b ≤ ∑ x in s, w x) :
∃ y ∈ t, b ≤ ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x :=
exists_le_of_sum_le ht $ by simpa only [sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to hf, sum_const]
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, non-strict inequality
version: if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is less than or equal to `n • b`, and they
are sorted into `n > 0` pigeonholes, then for some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons in
this pigeonhole is less than or equal to `b`. -/
lemma exists_sum_fiber_le_of_maps_to_of_sum_le_nsmul (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.nonempty)
(hb : (∑ x in s, w x) ≤ t.card • b) :
∃ y ∈ t, (∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) ≤ b :=
@exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum α β Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf ht hb
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, non-strict inequality
version: if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is greater than or equal to `n • b`, they
are sorted into some pigeonholes, and for all but `n > 0` pigeonholes the total weight of the
pigeons there is nonpositive, then for at least one of these `n` pigeonholes, the total weight of
the pigeons in this pigeonhole is greater than or equal to `b`. -/
lemma exists_le_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_le_sum
(hf : ∀ y ∉ t, (∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) ≤ 0) (ht : t.nonempty)
(hb : t.card • b ≤ ∑ x in s, w x) :
∃ y ∈ t, b ≤ ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x :=
exists_le_of_sum_le ht $
calc (∑ y in t, b) ≤ ∑ x in s, w x : by simpa
... ≤ ∑ y in t, ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x :
sum_le_sum_fiberwise_of_sum_fiber_nonpos hf
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, non-strict inequality
version: if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is less than or equal to `n • b`, they are
sorted into some pigeonholes, and for all but `n > 0` pigeonholes the total weight of the pigeons
there is nonnegative, then for at least one of these `n` pigeonholes, the total weight of the
pigeons in this pigeonhole is less than or equal to `b`. -/
lemma exists_sum_fiber_le_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_le_nsmul
(hf : ∀ y ∉ t, (0:M) ≤ ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) (ht : t.nonempty)
(hb : (∑ x in s, w x) ≤ t.card • b) :
∃ y ∈ t, (∑ x in s.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) ≤ b :=
@exists_le_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_le_sum α β Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf ht hb
end
variables [linear_ordered_comm_ring M]
/-!
### The pigeonhole principles on `finset`s, pigeons counted by heads
In this section we formalize a few versions of the following pigeonhole principle: there is a
pigeonhole with at least as many pigeons as the ceiling of the average number of pigeons across all
pigeonholes.
First, we can use strict or non-strict inequalities. While the versions with non-strict inequalities
are weaker than those with strict inequalities, sometimes it might be more convenient to apply the
weaker version. Second, we can either state that there exists a pigeonhole with at least `n`
pigeons, or state that there exists a pigeonhole with at most `n` pigeons. In the latter case we do
not need the assumption `∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t`.
So, we prove four theorems: `finset.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_maps_to_of_mul_lt_card`,
`finset.exists_le_card_fiber_of_maps_to_of_mul_le_card`,
`finset.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul`, and `finset.exists_card_fiber_le_of_card_le_mul`. -/
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: there is a pigeonhole with
at least as many pigeons as the ceiling of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes. -/
lemma exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(ht : t.card • b < s.card) :
∃ y ∈ t, b < (s.filter $ λ x, f x = y).card :=
begin
simp_rw cast_card at ⊢ ht,
exact exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum hf ht,
end
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: there is a pigeonhole with
at least as many pigeons as the ceiling of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes.
("The maximum is at least the mean" specialized to integers.)
More formally, given a function between finite sets `s` and `t` and a natural number `n` such that
`card t * n < card s`, there exists `y ∈ t` such that its preimage in `s` has more than `n`
elements. -/
lemma exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hn : t.card * n < s.card) :
∃ y ∈ t, n < (s.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card :=
begin
simp only [card_eq_sum_ones],
apply exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum hf,
simpa
end
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: there is a pigeonhole with
at most as many pigeons as the floor of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes. -/
lemma exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul (ht : ↑(s.card) < t.card • b) :
∃ y ∈ t, ↑((s.filter $ λ x, f x = y).card) < b :=
begin
simp_rw cast_card at ⊢ ht,
exact exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_lt_nsmul
(λ _ _, sum_nonneg $ λ _ _, zero_le_one) ht,
end
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: there is a pigeonhole with
at most as many pigeons as the floor of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes. ("The
minimum is at most the mean" specialized to integers.)
More formally, given a function `f`, a finite sets `s` in its domain, a finite set `t` in its
codomain, and a natural number `n` such that `card s < card t * n`, there exists `y ∈ t` such that
its preimage in `s` has less than `n` elements. -/
lemma exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul (hn : s.card < t.card * n) :
∃ y ∈ t, (s.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card < n:=
begin
simp only [card_eq_sum_ones],
apply exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_lt_nsmul (λ _ _, nat.zero_le _),
simpa
end
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: given a function between
finite sets `s` and `t` and a number `b` such that `card t • b ≤ card s`, there exists `y ∈ t` such
that its preimage in `s` has at least `b` elements.
See also `finset.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to` for a stronger statement. -/
lemma exists_le_card_fiber_of_nsmul_le_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.nonempty)
(hb : t.card • b ≤ s.card) :
∃ y ∈ t, b ≤ (s.filter $ λ x, f x = y).card :=
begin
simp_rw cast_card at ⊢ hb,
exact exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum hf ht hb,
end
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: given a function between
finite sets `s` and `t` and a natural number `b` such that `card t * n ≤ card s`, there exists `y ∈
t` such that its preimage in `s` has at least `n` elements. See also
`finset.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card_of_maps_to` for a stronger statement. -/
lemma exists_le_card_fiber_of_mul_le_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.nonempty)
(hn : t.card * n ≤ s.card) :
∃ y ∈ t, n ≤ (s.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card :=
begin
simp only [card_eq_sum_ones],
apply exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum hf ht,
simpa
end
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: given a function `f`, a
finite sets `s` and `t`, and a number `b` such that `card s ≤ card t • b`, there exists `y ∈ t` such
that its preimage in `s` has no more than `b` elements.
See also `finset.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul` for a stronger statement. -/
lemma exists_card_fiber_le_of_card_le_nsmul (ht : t.nonempty) (hb : ↑(s.card) ≤ t.card • b) :
∃ y ∈ t, ↑((s.filter $ λ x, f x = y).card) ≤ b :=
begin
simp_rw cast_card at ⊢ hb,
refine exists_sum_fiber_le_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_le_nsmul
(λ _ _, sum_nonneg $ λ _ _, zero_le_one) ht hb,
end
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: given a function `f`, a
finite sets `s` in its domain, a finite set `t` in its codomain, and a natural number `n` such that
`card s ≤ card t * n`, there exists `y ∈ t` such that its preimage in `s` has no more than `n`
elements. See also `finset.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul` for a stronger statement. -/
lemma exists_card_fiber_le_of_card_le_mul (ht : t.nonempty) (hn : s.card ≤ t.card * n) :
∃ y ∈ t, (s.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card ≤ n:=
begin
simp only [card_eq_sum_ones],
apply exists_sum_fiber_le_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_le_nsmul (λ _ _, nat.zero_le _) ht,
simpa
end
end finset
namespace fintype
open finset
variables [fintype α] [fintype β] (f : α → β) {w : α → M} {b : M} {n : ℕ}
section
variables [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid M]
/-!
### The pigeonhole principles on `fintypes`s, pigeons counted by weight
In this section we specialize theorems from the previous section to the special case of functions
between `fintype`s and `s = univ`, `t = univ`. In this case the assumption `∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t` always
holds, so we have four theorems instead of eight. -/
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons of different weights, strict inequality
version: there is a pigeonhole with the total weight of pigeons in it greater than `b` provided that
the total number of pigeonholes times `b` is less than the total weight of all pigeons. -/
lemma exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_sum (hb : card β • b < ∑ x, w x) :
∃ y, b < ∑ x in univ.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x :=
let ⟨y, _, hy⟩ := exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum (λ _ _, mem_univ _) hb in ⟨y, hy⟩
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons of different weights, non-strict inequality
version: there is a pigeonhole with the total weight of pigeons in it greater than or equal to `b`
provided that the total number of pigeonholes times `b` is less than or equal to the total weight of
all pigeons. -/
lemma exists_le_sum_fiber_of_nsmul_le_sum [nonempty β] (hb : card β • b ≤ ∑ x, w x) :
∃ y, b ≤ ∑ x in univ.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x :=
let ⟨y, _, hy⟩ :=
exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum (λ _ _, mem_univ _) univ_nonempty hb
in ⟨y, hy⟩
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons of different weights, strict inequality
version: there is a pigeonhole with the total weight of pigeons in it less than `b` provided that
the total number of pigeonholes times `b` is greater than the total weight of all pigeons. -/
lemma exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_lt_nsmul (hb : (∑ x, w x) < card β • b) :
∃ y, (∑ x in univ.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) < b :=
@exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_sum α β Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hb
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons of different weights, non-strict inequality
version: there is a pigeonhole with the total weight of pigeons in it less than or equal to `b`
provided that the total number of pigeonholes times `b` is greater than or equal to the total weight
of all pigeons. -/
lemma exists_sum_fiber_le_of_sum_le_nsmul [nonempty β] (hb : (∑ x, w x) ≤ card β • b) :
∃ y, (∑ x in univ.filter (λ x, f x = y), w x) ≤ b :=
@exists_le_sum_fiber_of_nsmul_le_sum α β Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hb
end
variables [linear_ordered_comm_ring M]
/--
The strong pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes. There is a pigeonhole
with at least as many pigeons as the ceiling of the average number of pigeons across all
pigeonholes. -/
lemma exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card (hb : card β • b < card α) :
∃ y : β, b < (univ.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card :=
let ⟨y, _, h⟩ := exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to (λ _ _, mem_univ _) hb in ⟨y, h⟩
/--
The strong pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes.
There is a pigeonhole with at least as many pigeons as
the ceiling of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes.
("The maximum is at least the mean" specialized to integers.)
More formally, given a function `f` between finite types `α` and `β` and a number `n` such that
`card β * n < card α`, there exists an element `y : β` such that its preimage has more than `n`
elements. -/
lemma exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card (hn : card β * n < card α) :
∃ y : β, n < (univ.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card :=
let ⟨y, _, h⟩ := exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card_of_maps_to (λ _ _, mem_univ _) hn in ⟨y, h⟩
/-- The strong pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes. There is a pigeonhole
with at most as many pigeons as the floor of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes.
-/
lemma exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul (hb : ↑(card α) < card β • b) :
∃ y : β, ↑((univ.filter $ λ x, f x = y).card) < b :=
let ⟨y, _, h⟩ := exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul hb in ⟨y, h⟩
/--
The strong pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes.
There is a pigeonhole with at most as many pigeons as
the floor of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes.
("The minimum is at most the mean" specialized to integers.)
More formally, given a function `f` between finite types `α` and `β` and a number `n` such that
`card α < card β * n`, there exists an element `y : β` such that its preimage has less than `n`
elements. -/
lemma exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul (hn : card α < card β * n) :
∃ y : β, (univ.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card < n :=
let ⟨y, _, h⟩ := exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul hn in ⟨y, h⟩
/-- The strong pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes. Given a function `f`
between finite types `α` and `β` and a number `b` such that `card β • b ≤ card α`, there exists an
element `y : β` such that its preimage has at least `b` elements.
See also `fintype.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card` for a stronger statement. -/
lemma exists_le_card_fiber_of_nsmul_le_card [nonempty β] (hb : card β • b ≤ card α) :
∃ y : β, b ≤ (univ.filter $ λ x, f x = y).card :=
let ⟨y, _, h⟩ := exists_le_card_fiber_of_nsmul_le_card_of_maps_to (λ _ _, mem_univ _) univ_nonempty
hb in ⟨y, h⟩
/-- The strong pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes. Given a function `f`
between finite types `α` and `β` and a number `n` such that `card β * n ≤ card α`, there exists an
element `y : β` such that its preimage has at least `n` elements. See also
`fintype.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card` for a stronger statement. -/
lemma exists_le_card_fiber_of_mul_le_card [nonempty β] (hn : card β * n ≤ card α) :
∃ y : β, n ≤ (univ.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card :=
let ⟨y, _, h⟩ := exists_le_card_fiber_of_mul_le_card_of_maps_to (λ _ _, mem_univ _) univ_nonempty hn
in ⟨y, h⟩
/-- The strong pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes. Given a function `f`
between finite types `α` and `β` and a number `b` such that `card α ≤ card β • b`, there exists an
element `y : β` such that its preimage has at most `b` elements.
See also `fintype.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul` for a stronger statement. -/
lemma exists_card_fiber_le_of_card_le_nsmul [nonempty β] (hb : ↑(card α) ≤ card β • b) :
∃ y : β, ↑((univ.filter $ λ x, f x = y).card) ≤ b :=
let ⟨y, _, h⟩ := exists_card_fiber_le_of_card_le_nsmul univ_nonempty hb in ⟨y, h⟩
/-- The strong pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons and pigeonholes. Given a function `f`
between finite types `α` and `β` and a number `n` such that `card α ≤ card β * n`, there exists an
element `y : β` such that its preimage has at most `n` elements. See also
`fintype.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul` for a stronger statement. -/
lemma exists_card_fiber_le_of_card_le_mul [nonempty β] (hn : card α ≤ card β * n) :
∃ y : β, (univ.filter (λ x, f x = y)).card ≤ n :=
let ⟨y, _, h⟩ := exists_card_fiber_le_of_card_le_mul univ_nonempty hn in ⟨y, h⟩
end fintype
namespace nat
open set
/-- If `s` is an infinite set of natural numbers and `k > 0`, then `s` contains two elements `m < n`
that are equal mod `k`. -/
theorem exists_lt_modeq_of_infinite {s : set ℕ} (hs : s.infinite) {k : ℕ} (hk : 0 < k) :
∃ (m ∈ s) (n ∈ s), m < n ∧ m ≡ n [MOD k] :=
hs.exists_lt_map_eq_of_maps_to (λ n _, show n % k ∈ Iio k, from nat.mod_lt n hk) $
finite_lt_nat k
end nat
|
242c907921f98394cc025ef610e70e5a00d6367b | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/algebra/group/anti_hom.lean | 3e12ade50eccaa9271551a24fc4458c48fb12e1b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 928 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
Various multiplicative and additive structures.
-/
import algebra.group.basic
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [group α] [group β]
/-- Predicate for group anti-homomorphism, or a homomorphism
into the opposite group. -/
class is_group_anti_hom (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(map_mul [] : ∀ a b : α, f (a * b) = f b * f a)
namespace is_group_anti_hom
variables (f : α → β) [w : is_group_anti_hom f]
include w
theorem map_one : f 1 = 1 :=
mul_self_iff_eq_one.1 $ by rw [← map_mul f, one_mul]
theorem map_inv (a : α) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one $ by rw [← map_mul f, mul_inv_self, map_one f]
end is_group_anti_hom
theorem inv_is_group_anti_hom : is_group_anti_hom (λ x : α, x⁻¹) :=
⟨mul_inv_rev⟩
|
9bd03ec1c8d2b7b58e794dc04cf500a2470e1a5d | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/algebra/group/to_additive.lean | 8c9c500a69375535279f2b7e22bb04bbc3336407 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,385 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov.
-/
import tactic.transform_decl
import tactic.algebra
/-!
# Transport multiplicative to additive
This file defines an attribute `to_additive` that can be used to
automatically transport theorems and definitions (but not inductive
types and structures) from multiplicative theory to additive theory.
To use this attribute, just write
```
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm' {α} [comm_semigroup α] (x y : α) : x * y = y * x := comm_semigroup.mul_comm
```
This code will generate a theorem named `add_comm'`. It is also
possible to manually specify the name of the new declaration, and
provide a documentation string.
The transport tries to do the right thing in most cases using several
heuristics described below. However, in some cases it fails, and
requires manual intervention.
## Implementation notes
### Handling of hidden definitions
Before transporting the “main” declaration `src`, `to_additive` first
scans its type and value for names starting with `src`, and transports
them. This includes auxiliary definitions like `src._match_1`,
`src._proof_1`.
After transporting the “main” declaration, `to_additive` transports
its equational lemmas.
### Structure fields and constructors
If `src` is a structure, then `to_additive` automatically adds
structure fields to its mapping, and similarly for constructors of
inductive types.
For new structures this means that `to_additive` automatically handles
coercions, and for old structures it does the same, if ancestry
information is present in `@[ancestor]` attributes.
### Name generation
* If `@[to_additive]` is called without a `name` argument, then the
new name is autogenerated. First, it takes the longest prefix of
the source name that is already known to `to_additive`, and replaces
this prefix with its additive counterpart. Second, it takes the last
part of the name (i.e., after the last dot), and replaces common
name parts (“mul”, “one”, “inv”, “prod”) with their additive versions.
* If `@[to_additive]` is called with a `name` argument `new_name`
/without a dot/, then `to_additive` updates the prefix as described
above, then replaces the last part of the name with `new_name`.
* If `@[to_additive]` is called with a `name` argument
`new_namespace.new_name` /with a dot/, then `to_additive` uses this
new name as is.
As a safety check, in the first two cases `to_additive` double checks
that the new name differs from the original one.
### Missing features
* Automatically transport structures and other inductive types.
* For structures, automatically generate theorems like `group α ↔
add_group (additive α)`.
* Rewrite rules for the last part of the name that work in more
cases. E.g., we can replace `monoid` with `add_monoid` etc.
-/
namespace to_additive
open tactic exceptional
@[user_attribute]
meta def aux_attr : user_attribute (name_map name) name :=
{ name := `to_additive_aux,
descr := "Auxiliary attribute for `to_additive`. DON'T USE IT",
cache_cfg := ⟨λ ns,
ns.mfoldl
(λ dict n',
let n := match n' with
| name.mk_string s pre := if s = "_to_additive" then pre else n'
| _ := n'
end
in dict.insert n <$> aux_attr.get_param n')
mk_name_map, []⟩,
parser := lean.parser.ident }
meta def map_namespace (src tgt : name) : command :=
do let n := src.mk_string "_to_additive",
let decl := declaration.thm n [] `(unit) (pure (reflect ())),
add_decl decl,
aux_attr.set n tgt tt
@[derive has_reflect, derive inhabited]
structure value_type := (tgt : name) (doc : option string)
/-- Dictionary of words used by `to_additive.guess_name` to autogenerate
names. -/
meta def tokens_dict : native.rb_map string string :=
native.rb_map.of_list $
[("mul", "add"), ("one", "zero"), ("inv", "neg"), ("prod", "sum")]
/-- Autogenerate target name for `to_additive`. -/
meta def guess_name : string → string :=
string.map_tokens '_' $
string.map_tokens ''' $
λ s, (tokens_dict.find s).get_or_else s
meta def target_name (src tgt : name) (dict : name_map name) : tactic name :=
(if tgt.get_prefix ≠ name.anonymous -- `tgt` is a full name
then pure tgt
else match src with
| (name.mk_string s pre) :=
do let tgt_auto := guess_name s,
guard (tgt.to_string ≠ tgt_auto)
<|> trace ("`to_additive " ++ src.to_string ++ "`: remove `name` argument"),
pure $ name.mk_string
(if tgt = name.anonymous then tgt_auto else tgt.to_string)
(pre.map_prefix dict.find)
| _ := fail ("to_additive: can't transport " ++ src.to_string)
end) >>=
(λ res,
if res = src
then fail ("to_additive: can't transport " ++ src.to_string ++ " to itself")
else pure res)
meta def parser : lean.parser value_type :=
do
tgt ← optional lean.parser.ident,
e ← optional interactive.types.texpr,
doc ← match e with
| some pe := some <$> ((to_expr pe >>= eval_expr string) : tactic string)
| none := pure none
end,
return ⟨tgt.get_or_else name.anonymous, doc⟩
private meta def proceed_fields_aux (src tgt : name) (prio : ℕ) (f : name → tactic (list string)) :
command :=
do
src_fields ← f src,
tgt_fields ← f tgt,
guard (src_fields.length = tgt_fields.length) <|>
fail ("Failed to map fields of " ++ src.to_string),
(src_fields.zip tgt_fields).mmap' $
λ names, guard (names.fst = names.snd) <|>
aux_attr.set (src.append names.fst) (tgt.append names.snd) tt prio
meta def proceed_fields (env : environment) (src tgt : name) (prio : ℕ) : command :=
let aux := proceed_fields_aux src tgt prio in
do
aux (λ n, pure $ list.map name.to_string $ (env.structure_fields n).get_or_else []) >>
aux (λ n, (list.map (λ (x : name), "to_" ++ x.to_string) <$>
(ancestor_attr.get_param n <|> pure []))) >>
aux (λ n, (env.constructors_of n).mmap $
λ cs, match cs with
| (name.mk_string s pre) :=
(guard (pre = n) <|> fail "Bad constructor name") >>
pure s
| _ := fail "Bad constructor name"
end)
@[user_attribute]
protected meta def attr : user_attribute unit value_type :=
{ name := `to_additive,
descr := "Transport multiplicative to additive",
parser := parser,
after_set := some $ λ src prio persistent, do
guard persistent <|> fail "`to_additive` can't be used as a local attribute",
env ← get_env,
val ← attr.get_param src,
dict ← aux_attr.get_cache,
tgt ← target_name src val.tgt dict,
aux_attr.set src tgt tt,
let dict := dict.insert src tgt,
if env.contains tgt
then proceed_fields env src tgt prio
else do
transform_decl_with_prefix_dict dict src tgt
[`reducible, `simp, `instance, `refl, `symm, `trans, `elab_as_eliminator, `no_rsimp],
match val.doc with
| some doc := add_doc_string tgt doc
| none := skip
end }
end to_additive
/- map operations -/
attribute [to_additive] has_mul has_one has_inv
|
cf858847d6c87de51c777b979264b30476afc49a | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/ring_theory/tensor_product.lean | 8f9bb03eb1aa5e26293cfd7b2b008e1374012ace | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,961 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Johan Commelin
-/
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import ring_theory.adjoin.basic
import linear_algebra.direct_sum.finsupp
/-!
# The tensor product of R-algebras
Let `R` be a (semi)ring and `A` an `R`-algebra.
In this file we:
- Define the `A`-module structure on `A ⊗ M`, for an `R`-module `M`.
- Define the `R`-algebra structure on `A ⊗ B`, for another `R`-algebra `B`.
and provide the structure isomorphisms
* `R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A`
* `A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[R] A`
* `A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A`
* `((A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C) ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] (B ⊗[R] C))`
## Main declaration
- `linear_map.base_change A f` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗ f`, for an `R`-linear map `f`.
## Implementation notes
The heterobasic definitions below such as:
* `tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.curry`
* `tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.uncurry`
* `tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.lcurry`
* `tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.lift`
* `tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.lift.equiv`
* `tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.mk`
* `tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.assoc`
are just more general versions of the definitions already in `linear_algebra/tensor_product`. We
could thus consider replacing the less general definitions with these ones. If we do this, we
probably should still implement the less general ones as abbreviations to the more general ones with
fewer type arguments.
-/
universes u v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄
open_locale tensor_product
open tensor_product
namespace tensor_product
variables {R A M N P : Type*}
/-!
### The `A`-module structure on `A ⊗[R] M`
-/
open linear_map
open algebra (lsmul)
namespace algebra_tensor_module
section semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [module A M] [is_scalar_tower R A M]
variables [add_comm_monoid N] [module R N]
variables [add_comm_monoid P] [module R P] [module A P] [is_scalar_tower R A P]
lemma smul_eq_lsmul_rtensor (a : A) (x : M ⊗[R] N) : a • x = (lsmul R M a).rtensor N x := rfl
/-- Heterobasic version of `tensor_product.curry`:
Given a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P`, compose it with the canonical
bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` to form a bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
@[simps] def curry (f : (M ⊗[R] N) →ₗ[A] P) : M →ₗ[A] (N →ₗ[R] P) :=
{ map_smul' := λ c x, linear_map.ext $ λ y, f.map_smul c (x ⊗ₜ y),
.. curry (f.restrict_scalars R) }
lemma restrict_scalars_curry (f : (M ⊗[R] N) →ₗ[A] P) :
restrict_scalars R (curry f) = curry (f.restrict_scalars R) :=
rfl
/-- Just as `tensor_product.ext` is marked `ext` instead of `tensor_product.ext'`, this is
a better `ext` lemma than `tensor_product.algebra_tensor_module.ext` below.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext] lemma curry_injective :
function.injective (curry : (M ⊗ N →ₗ[A] P) → (M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P)) :=
λ x y h, linear_map.restrict_scalars_injective R $ curry_injective $
(congr_arg (linear_map.restrict_scalars R) h : _)
theorem ext {g h : (M ⊗[R] N) →ₗ[A] P}
(H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = h (x ⊗ₜ y)) : g = h :=
curry_injective $ linear_map.ext₂ H
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [module A M] [is_scalar_tower R A M]
variables [add_comm_monoid N] [module R N]
variables [add_comm_monoid P] [module R P] [module A P] [is_scalar_tower R A P]
/-- Heterobasic version of `tensor_product.lift`:
Constructing a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P` given a bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P` with the
property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` is
the given bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
@[simps] def lift (f : M →ₗ[A] (N →ₗ[R] P)) : (M ⊗[R] N) →ₗ[A] P :=
{ map_smul' := λ c, show ∀ x : M ⊗[R] N, (lift (f.restrict_scalars R)).comp (lsmul R _ c) x =
(lsmul R _ c).comp (lift (f.restrict_scalars R)) x,
from ext_iff.1 $ tensor_product.ext' $ λ x y,
by simp only [comp_apply, algebra.lsmul_coe, smul_tmul', lift.tmul, coe_restrict_scalars_eq_coe,
f.map_smul, smul_apply],
.. lift (f.restrict_scalars R) }
@[simp] lemma lift_tmul (f : M →ₗ[A] (N →ₗ[R] P)) (x : M) (y : N) :
lift f (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
lift.tmul' x y
variables (R A M N P)
/-- Heterobasic version of `tensor_product.uncurry`:
Linearly constructing a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P` given a bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` is
the given bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
@[simps] def uncurry : (M →ₗ[A] (N →ₗ[R] P)) →ₗ[A] ((M ⊗[R] N) →ₗ[A] P) :=
{ to_fun := lift,
map_add' := λ f g, ext $ λ x y, by simp only [lift_tmul, add_apply],
map_smul' := λ c f, ext $ λ x y, by simp only [lift_tmul, smul_apply, ring_hom.id_apply] }
/-- Heterobasic version of `tensor_product.lcurry`:
Given a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P`, compose it with the canonical
bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` to form a bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
@[simps] def lcurry : ((M ⊗[R] N) →ₗ[A] P) →ₗ[A] (M →ₗ[A] (N →ₗ[R] P)) :=
{ to_fun := curry,
map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl }
/-- Heterobasic version of `tensor_product.lift.equiv`:
A linear equivalence constructing a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P` given a
bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P` with the property that its composition with the
canonical bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` is the given bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
def lift.equiv : (M →ₗ[A] (N →ₗ[R] P)) ≃ₗ[A] ((M ⊗[R] N) →ₗ[A] P) :=
linear_equiv.of_linear (uncurry R A M N P) (lcurry R A M N P)
(linear_map.ext $ λ f, ext $ λ x y, lift_tmul _ x y)
(linear_map.ext $ λ f, linear_map.ext $ λ x, linear_map.ext $ λ y, lift_tmul f x y)
variables (R A M N P)
/-- Heterobasic version of `tensor_product.mk`:
The canonical bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N`. -/
@[simps] def mk : M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N :=
{ map_smul' := λ c x, rfl,
.. mk R M N }
local attribute [ext] tensor_product.ext
/-- Heterobasic version of `tensor_product.assoc`:
Linear equivalence between `(M ⊗[A] N) ⊗[R] P` and `M ⊗[A] (N ⊗[R] P)`. -/
def assoc : ((M ⊗[A] P) ⊗[R] N) ≃ₗ[A] (M ⊗[A] (P ⊗[R] N)) :=
linear_equiv.of_linear
(lift $ tensor_product.uncurry A _ _ _ $ comp (lcurry R A _ _ _) $
tensor_product.mk A M (P ⊗[R] N))
(tensor_product.uncurry A _ _ _ $ comp (uncurry R A _ _ _) $
by { apply tensor_product.curry, exact (mk R A _ _) })
(by { ext, refl, })
(by { ext, simp only [curry_apply, tensor_product.curry_apply, mk_apply, tensor_product.mk_apply,
uncurry_apply, tensor_product.uncurry_apply, id_apply, lift_tmul, compr₂_apply,
restrict_scalars_apply, function.comp_app, to_fun_eq_coe, lcurry_apply,
linear_map.comp_apply] })
end comm_semiring
end algebra_tensor_module
end tensor_product
namespace linear_map
open tensor_product
/-!
### The base-change of a linear map of `R`-modules to a linear map of `A`-modules
-/
section semiring
variables {R A B M N : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
variables [semiring A] [algebra R A] [semiring B] [algebra R B]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [add_comm_monoid N] [module R N]
variables (r : R) (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
variables (A)
/-- `base_change A f` for `f : M →ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`. -/
def base_change (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
{ to_fun := f.ltensor A,
map_add' := (f.ltensor A).map_add,
map_smul' := λ a x,
show (f.ltensor A) (rtensor M (linear_map.mul R A a) x) =
(rtensor N ((linear_map.mul R A) a)) ((ltensor A f) x),
by { rw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply],
simp only [ltensor_comp_rtensor, rtensor_comp_ltensor] } }
variables {A}
@[simp] lemma base_change_tmul (a : A) (x : M) :
f.base_change A (a ⊗ₜ x) = a ⊗ₜ (f x) := rfl
lemma base_change_eq_ltensor :
(f.base_change A : A ⊗ M → A ⊗ N) = f.ltensor A := rfl
@[simp] lemma base_change_add :
(f + g).base_change A = f.base_change A + g.base_change A :=
by { ext, simp [base_change_eq_ltensor], }
@[simp] lemma base_change_zero : base_change A (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 :=
by { ext, simp [base_change_eq_ltensor], }
@[simp] lemma base_change_smul : (r • f).base_change A = r • (f.base_change A) :=
by { ext, simp [base_change_tmul], }
variables (R A M N)
/-- `base_change` as a linear map. -/
@[simps] def base_change_hom : (M →ₗ[R] N) →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
{ to_fun := base_change A,
map_add' := base_change_add,
map_smul' := base_change_smul }
end semiring
section ring
variables {R A B M N : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables [ring A] [algebra R A] [ring B] [algebra R B]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [add_comm_group N] [module R N]
variables (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
@[simp] lemma base_change_sub :
(f - g).base_change A = f.base_change A - g.base_change A :=
by { ext, simp [base_change_eq_ltensor], }
@[simp] lemma base_change_neg : (-f).base_change A = -(f.base_change A) :=
by { ext, simp [base_change_eq_ltensor], }
end ring
end linear_map
namespace algebra
namespace tensor_product
section semiring
variables {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R]
variables {A : Type v₁} [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables {B : Type v₂} [semiring B] [algebra R B]
/-!
### The `R`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`
-/
/--
(Implementation detail)
The multiplication map on `A ⊗[R] B`,
for a fixed pure tensor in the first argument,
as an `R`-linear map.
-/
def mul_aux (a₁ : A) (b₁ : B) : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₗ[R] (A ⊗[R] B) :=
tensor_product.map (linear_map.mul_left R a₁) (linear_map.mul_left R b₁)
@[simp]
lemma mul_aux_apply (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
(mul_aux a₁ b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
/--
(Implementation detail)
The multiplication map on `A ⊗[R] B`,
as an `R`-bilinear map.
-/
def mul : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₗ[R] (A ⊗[R] B) →ₗ[R] (A ⊗[R] B) :=
tensor_product.lift $ linear_map.mk₂ R mul_aux
(λ x₁ x₂ y, tensor_product.ext' $ λ x' y',
by simp only [mul_aux_apply, linear_map.add_apply, add_mul, add_tmul])
(λ c x y, tensor_product.ext' $ λ x' y',
by simp only [mul_aux_apply, linear_map.smul_apply, smul_tmul', smul_mul_assoc])
(λ x y₁ y₂, tensor_product.ext' $ λ x' y',
by simp only [mul_aux_apply, linear_map.add_apply, add_mul, tmul_add])
(λ c x y, tensor_product.ext' $ λ x' y',
by simp only [mul_aux_apply, linear_map.smul_apply, smul_tmul, smul_tmul', smul_mul_assoc])
@[simp]
lemma mul_apply (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
mul (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
lemma mul_assoc' (mul : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₗ[R] (A ⊗[R] B) →ₗ[R] (A ⊗[R] B))
(h : ∀ (a₁ a₂ a₃ : A) (b₁ b₂ b₃ : B),
mul (mul (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂)) (a₃ ⊗ₜ[R] b₃) =
mul (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (mul (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) (a₃ ⊗ₜ[R] b₃))) :
∀ (x y z : A ⊗[R] B), mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z) :=
begin
intros,
apply tensor_product.induction_on x,
{ simp only [linear_map.map_zero, linear_map.zero_apply], },
apply tensor_product.induction_on y,
{ simp only [linear_map.map_zero, forall_const, linear_map.zero_apply], },
apply tensor_product.induction_on z,
{ simp only [linear_map.map_zero, forall_const], },
{ intros, simp only [h], },
{ intros, simp only [linear_map.map_add, *], },
{ intros, simp only [linear_map.map_add, *, linear_map.add_apply], },
{ intros, simp only [linear_map.map_add, *, linear_map.add_apply], },
end
lemma mul_assoc (x y z : A ⊗[R] B) : mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z) :=
mul_assoc' mul (by { intros, simp only [mul_apply, mul_assoc], }) x y z
lemma one_mul (x : A ⊗[R] B) : mul (1 ⊗ₜ 1) x = x :=
begin
apply tensor_product.induction_on x;
simp {contextual := tt},
end
lemma mul_one (x : A ⊗[R] B) : mul x (1 ⊗ₜ 1) = x :=
begin
apply tensor_product.induction_on x;
simp {contextual := tt},
end
instance : has_one (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ one := 1 ⊗ₜ 1 }
instance : add_monoid_with_one (A ⊗[R] B) := add_monoid_with_one.unary
instance : semiring (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
one := 1,
mul := λ a b, mul a b,
one_mul := one_mul,
mul_one := mul_one,
mul_assoc := mul_assoc,
zero_mul := by simp,
mul_zero := by simp,
left_distrib := by simp,
right_distrib := by simp,
.. (by apply_instance : add_monoid_with_one (A ⊗[R] B)),
.. (by apply_instance : add_comm_monoid (A ⊗[R] B)) }.
lemma one_def : (1 : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma tmul_mul_tmul (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
(a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) * (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma tmul_pow (a : A) (b : B) (k : ℕ) :
(a ⊗ₜ[R] b)^k = (a^k) ⊗ₜ[R] (b^k) :=
begin
induction k with k ih,
{ simp [one_def], },
{ simp [pow_succ, ih], }
end
/-- The ring morphism `A →+* A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
@[simps]
def include_left_ring_hom : A →+* A ⊗[R] B :=
{ to_fun := λ a, a ⊗ₜ 1,
map_zero' := by simp,
map_add' := by simp [add_tmul],
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := by simp }
variables {S : Type*} [comm_semiring S] [algebra R S] [algebra S A] [is_scalar_tower R S A]
instance left_algebra : algebra S (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ commutes' := λ r x,
begin
apply tensor_product.induction_on x,
{ simp, },
{ intros a b, dsimp, rw [algebra.commutes, _root_.mul_one, _root_.one_mul], },
{ intros y y' h h', dsimp at h h' ⊢, simp only [mul_add, add_mul, h, h'], },
end,
smul_def' := λ r x,
begin
apply tensor_product.induction_on x,
{ simp [smul_zero], },
{ intros a b, dsimp, rw [tensor_product.smul_tmul', algebra.smul_def r a, _root_.one_mul] },
{ intros, dsimp, simp [smul_add, mul_add, *], },
end,
.. tensor_product.include_left_ring_hom.comp (algebra_map S A),
.. (by apply_instance : module S (A ⊗[R] B)) }.
-- This is for the `undergrad.yaml` list.
/-- The tensor product of two `R`-algebras is an `R`-algebra. -/
instance : algebra R (A ⊗[R] B) := infer_instance
@[simp]
lemma algebra_map_apply (r : S) :
(algebra_map S (A ⊗[R] B)) r = ((algebra_map S A) r) ⊗ₜ 1 := rfl
instance : is_scalar_tower R S (A ⊗[R] B) := ⟨λ a b c, by simp⟩
variables {C : Type v₃} [semiring C] [algebra R C]
@[ext]
theorem ext {g h : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[R] C}
(H : ∀ a b, g (a ⊗ₜ b) = h (a ⊗ₜ b)) : g = h :=
begin
apply @alg_hom.to_linear_map_injective R (A ⊗[R] B) C _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
ext,
simp [H],
end
/-- The `R`-algebra morphism `A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
def include_left : A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B :=
{ commutes' := by simp,
..include_left_ring_hom }
@[simp]
lemma include_left_apply (a : A) : (include_left : A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B) a = a ⊗ₜ 1 := rfl
/-- The algebra morphism `B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B` sending `b` to `1 ⊗ₜ b`. -/
def include_right : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B :=
{ to_fun := λ b, 1 ⊗ₜ b,
map_zero' := by simp,
map_add' := by simp [tmul_add],
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := by simp,
commutes' := λ r,
begin
simp only [algebra_map_apply],
transitivity r • ((1 : A) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B)),
{ rw [←tmul_smul, algebra.smul_def], simp, },
{ simp [algebra.smul_def], },
end, }
@[simp]
lemma include_right_apply (b : B) : (include_right : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B) b = 1 ⊗ₜ b := rfl
lemma include_left_comp_algebra_map {R S T : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] [comm_ring T]
[algebra R S] [algebra R T] :
(include_left.to_ring_hom.comp (algebra_map R S) : R →+* S ⊗[R] T) =
include_right.to_ring_hom.comp (algebra_map R T) :=
by { ext, simp }
end semiring
section ring
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
variables {A : Type v₁} [ring A] [algebra R A]
variables {B : Type v₂} [ring B] [algebra R B]
instance : ring (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ .. (by apply_instance : add_comm_group (A ⊗[R] B)),
.. (by apply_instance : semiring (A ⊗[R] B)) }.
end ring
section comm_ring
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
variables {A : Type v₁} [comm_ring A] [algebra R A]
variables {B : Type v₂} [comm_ring B] [algebra R B]
instance : comm_ring (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ mul_comm := λ x y,
begin
apply tensor_product.induction_on x,
{ simp, },
{ intros a₁ b₁,
apply tensor_product.induction_on y,
{ simp, },
{ intros a₂ b₂,
simp [mul_comm], },
{ intros a₂ b₂ ha hb,
simp [mul_add, add_mul, ha, hb], }, },
{ intros x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂,
simp [mul_add, add_mul, h₁, h₂], },
end
.. (by apply_instance : ring (A ⊗[R] B)) }.
end comm_ring
/--
Verify that typeclass search finds the ring structure on `A ⊗[ℤ] B`
when `A` and `B` are merely rings, by treating both as `ℤ`-algebras.
-/
example {A : Type v₁} [ring A] {B : Type v₂} [ring B] : ring (A ⊗[ℤ] B) :=
by apply_instance
/--
Verify that typeclass search finds the comm_ring structure on `A ⊗[ℤ] B`
when `A` and `B` are merely comm_rings, by treating both as `ℤ`-algebras.
-/
example {A : Type v₁} [comm_ring A] {B : Type v₂} [comm_ring B] : comm_ring (A ⊗[ℤ] B) :=
by apply_instance
/-!
We now build the structure maps for the symmetric monoidal category of `R`-algebras.
-/
section monoidal
section
variables {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R]
variables {A : Type v₁} [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables {B : Type v₂} [semiring B] [algebra R B]
variables {C : Type v₃} [semiring C] [algebra R C]
variables {D : Type v₄} [semiring D] [algebra R D]
/--
Build an algebra morphism from a linear map out of a tensor product,
and evidence of multiplicativity on pure tensors.
-/
def alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product
(f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] C)
(w₁ : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(w₂ : ∀ r, f ((algebra_map R A) r ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = (algebra_map R C) r):
A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[R] C :=
{ map_one' := by rw [←(algebra_map R C).map_one, ←w₂, (algebra_map R A).map_one]; refl,
map_zero' := by rw [linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, map_zero],
map_mul' := λ x y, by
{ rw linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe,
apply tensor_product.induction_on x,
{ rw [zero_mul, map_zero, zero_mul] },
{ intros a₁ b₁,
apply tensor_product.induction_on y,
{ rw [mul_zero, map_zero, mul_zero] },
{ intros a₂ b₂,
rw [tmul_mul_tmul, w₁] },
{ intros x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂,
rw [mul_add, map_add, map_add, mul_add, h₁, h₂] } },
{ intros x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂,
rw [add_mul, map_add, map_add, add_mul, h₁, h₂] } },
commutes' := λ r, by rw [linear_map.to_fun_eq_coe, algebra_map_apply, w₂],
.. f }
@[simp]
lemma alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product_apply (f w₁ w₂ x) :
(alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product f w₁ w₂ : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[R] C) x = f x := rfl
/--
Build an algebra equivalence from a linear equivalence out of a tensor product,
and evidence of multiplicativity on pure tensors.
-/
def alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_tensor_product
(f : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₗ[R] C)
(w₁ : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(w₂ : ∀ r, f ((algebra_map R A) r ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = (algebra_map R C) r):
A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] C :=
{ .. alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product (f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] C) w₁ w₂,
.. f }
@[simp]
lemma alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_tensor_product_apply (f w₁ w₂ x) :
(alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_tensor_product f w₁ w₂ : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] C) x = f x := rfl
/--
Build an algebra equivalence from a linear equivalence out of a triple tensor product,
and evidence of multiplicativity on pure tensors.
-/
def alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_triple_tensor_product
(f : ((A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C) ≃ₗ[R] D)
(w₁ : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) (c₁ c₂ : C),
f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂) ⊗ₜ (c₁ * c₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁ ⊗ₜ c₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂ ⊗ₜ c₂))
(w₂ : ∀ r, f (((algebra_map R A) r ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B)) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : C)) = (algebra_map R D) r) :
(A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] D :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_mul' := λ x y,
begin
apply tensor_product.induction_on x,
{ simp only [map_zero, zero_mul] },
{ intros ab₁ c₁,
apply tensor_product.induction_on y,
{ simp only [map_zero, mul_zero] },
{ intros ab₂ c₂,
apply tensor_product.induction_on ab₁,
{ simp only [zero_tmul, map_zero, zero_mul] },
{ intros a₁ b₁,
apply tensor_product.induction_on ab₂,
{ simp only [zero_tmul, map_zero, mul_zero] },
{ intros, simp only [tmul_mul_tmul, w₁] },
{ intros x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂,
simp only [tmul_mul_tmul] at h₁ h₂,
simp only [tmul_mul_tmul, mul_add, add_tmul, map_add, h₁, h₂] } },
{ intros x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂,
simp only [tmul_mul_tmul] at h₁ h₂,
simp only [tmul_mul_tmul, add_mul, add_tmul, map_add, h₁, h₂] } },
{ intros x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂,
simp only [tmul_mul_tmul, map_add, mul_add, add_mul, h₁, h₂], }, },
{ intros x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂,
simp only [tmul_mul_tmul, map_add, mul_add, add_mul, h₁, h₂], }
end,
commutes' := λ r, by simp [w₂],
.. f }
@[simp]
lemma alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_triple_tensor_product_apply (f w₁ w₂ x) :
(alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_triple_tensor_product f w₁ w₂ : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] D) x = f x :=
rfl
end
variables {R : Type u} [comm_semiring R]
variables {A : Type v₁} [semiring A] [algebra R A]
variables {B : Type v₂} [semiring B] [algebra R B]
variables {C : Type v₃} [semiring C] [algebra R C]
variables {D : Type v₄} [semiring D] [algebra R D]
section
variables (R A)
/--
The base ring is a left identity for the tensor product of algebra, up to algebra isomorphism.
-/
protected def lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A :=
alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_tensor_product (tensor_product.lid R A)
(by simp [mul_smul]) (by simp [algebra.smul_def])
@[simp] theorem lid_tmul (r : R) (a : A) :
(tensor_product.lid R A : (R ⊗ A → A)) (r ⊗ₜ a) = r • a :=
by simp [tensor_product.lid]
/--
The base ring is a right identity for the tensor product of algebra, up to algebra isomorphism.
-/
protected def rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[R] A :=
alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_tensor_product (tensor_product.rid R A)
(by simp [mul_smul]) (by simp [algebra.smul_def])
@[simp] theorem rid_tmul (r : R) (a : A) :
(tensor_product.rid R A : (A ⊗ R → A)) (a ⊗ₜ r) = r • a :=
by simp [tensor_product.rid]
section
variables (R A B)
/--
The tensor product of R-algebras is commutative, up to algebra isomorphism.
-/
protected def comm : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A :=
alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_tensor_product (tensor_product.comm R A B)
(by simp)
(λ r, begin
transitivity r • ((1 : B) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : A)),
{ rw [←tmul_smul, algebra.smul_def], simp, },
{ simp [algebra.smul_def], },
end)
@[simp]
theorem comm_tmul (a : A) (b : B) :
(tensor_product.comm R A B : (A ⊗[R] B → B ⊗[R] A)) (a ⊗ₜ b) = (b ⊗ₜ a) :=
by simp [tensor_product.comm]
lemma adjoin_tmul_eq_top : adjoin R {t : A ⊗[R] B | ∃ a b, a ⊗ₜ[R] b = t} = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp $ (top_le_iff.mpr $ span_tmul_eq_top R A B).trans (span_le_adjoin R _)
end
section
variables {R A B C}
lemma assoc_aux_1 (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) (c₁ c₂ : C) :
(tensor_product.assoc R A B C) (((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂)) ⊗ₜ[R] (c₁ * c₂)) =
(tensor_product.assoc R A B C) ((a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) ⊗ₜ[R] c₁) *
(tensor_product.assoc R A B C) ((a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) ⊗ₜ[R] c₂) :=
rfl
lemma assoc_aux_2 (r : R) :
(tensor_product.assoc R A B C) (((algebra_map R A) r ⊗ₜ[R] 1) ⊗ₜ[R] 1) =
(algebra_map R (A ⊗ (B ⊗ C))) r := rfl
variables (R A B C)
/-- The associator for tensor product of R-algebras, as an algebra isomorphism. -/
protected def assoc : ((A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C) ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] (B ⊗[R] C)) :=
alg_equiv_of_linear_equiv_triple_tensor_product
(tensor_product.assoc.{u v₁ v₂ v₃} R A B C : (A ⊗ B ⊗ C) ≃ₗ[R] (A ⊗ (B ⊗ C)))
(@algebra.tensor_product.assoc_aux_1.{u v₁ v₂ v₃} R _ A _ _ B _ _ C _ _)
(@algebra.tensor_product.assoc_aux_2.{u v₁ v₂ v₃} R _ A _ _ B _ _ C _ _)
variables {R A B C}
@[simp] theorem assoc_tmul (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) :
((tensor_product.assoc R A B C) :
(A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C → A ⊗[R] (B ⊗[R] C)) ((a ⊗ₜ b) ⊗ₜ c) = a ⊗ₜ (b ⊗ₜ c) :=
rfl
end
variables {R A B C D}
/-- The tensor product of a pair of algebra morphisms. -/
def map (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) : A ⊗[R] C →ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] D :=
alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product
(tensor_product.map f.to_linear_map g.to_linear_map)
(by simp)
(by simp [alg_hom.commutes])
@[simp] theorem map_tmul (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) (a : A) (c : C) :
map f g (a ⊗ₜ c) = f a ⊗ₜ g c :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_comp_include_left (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).comp include_left = include_left.comp f := alg_hom.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma map_comp_include_right (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).comp include_right = include_right.comp g := alg_hom.ext $ by simp
lemma map_range (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D) :
(map f g).range = (include_left.comp f).range ⊔ (include_right.comp g).range :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [←map_top, ←adjoin_tmul_eq_top, ←adjoin_image, adjoin_le_iff],
rintros _ ⟨_, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
rw [map_tmul, ←_root_.mul_one (f a), ←_root_.one_mul (g b), ←tmul_mul_tmul],
exact mul_mem_sup (alg_hom.mem_range_self _ a) (alg_hom.mem_range_self _ b) },
{ rw [←map_comp_include_left f g, ←map_comp_include_right f g],
exact sup_le (alg_hom.range_comp_le_range _ _) (alg_hom.range_comp_le_range _ _) },
end
/--
Construct an isomorphism between tensor products of R-algebras
from isomorphisms between the tensor factors.
-/
def congr (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) (g : C ≃ₐ[R] D) : A ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] D :=
alg_equiv.of_alg_hom (map f g) (map f.symm g.symm)
(ext $ λ b d, by simp)
(ext $ λ a c, by simp)
@[simp]
lemma congr_apply (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) (g : C ≃ₐ[R] D) (x) :
congr f g x = (map (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D)) x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma congr_symm_apply (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) (g : C ≃ₐ[R] D) (x) :
(congr f g).symm x = (map (f.symm : B →ₐ[R] A) (g.symm : D →ₐ[R] C)) x := rfl
end
end monoidal
section
variables {R A B S : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [comm_semiring S]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B] [algebra R S]
variables (f : A →ₐ[R] S) (g : B →ₐ[R] S)
variables (R)
/-- `linear_map.mul'` is an alg_hom on commutative rings. -/
def lmul' : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S :=
alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product (linear_map.mul' R S)
(λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, by simp only [linear_map.mul'_apply, mul_mul_mul_comm])
(λ r, by simp only [linear_map.mul'_apply, _root_.mul_one])
variables {R}
lemma lmul'_to_linear_map : (lmul' R : _ →ₐ[R] S).to_linear_map = linear_map.mul' R S := rfl
@[simp] lemma lmul'_apply_tmul (a b : S) : lmul' R (a ⊗ₜ[R] b) = a * b := linear_map.mul'_apply
@[simp]
lemma lmul'_comp_include_left : (lmul' R : _ →ₐ[R] S).comp include_left = alg_hom.id R S :=
alg_hom.ext $ λ _, (lmul'_apply_tmul _ _).trans (_root_.mul_one _)
@[simp]
lemma lmul'_comp_include_right : (lmul' R : _ →ₐ[R] S).comp include_right = alg_hom.id R S :=
alg_hom.ext $ λ _, (lmul'_apply_tmul _ _).trans (_root_.one_mul _)
/--
If `S` is commutative, for a pair of morphisms `f : A →ₐ[R] S`, `g : B →ₐ[R] S`,
We obtain a map `A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[R] S` that commutes with `f`, `g` via `a ⊗ b ↦ f(a) * g(b)`.
-/
def product_map : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[R] S := (lmul' R).comp (tensor_product.map f g)
@[simp] lemma product_map_apply_tmul (a : A) (b : B) : product_map f g (a ⊗ₜ b) = f a * g b :=
by { unfold product_map lmul', simp }
lemma product_map_left_apply (a : A) :
product_map f g ((include_left : A →ₐ[R] A ⊗ B) a) = f a := by simp
@[simp] lemma product_map_left : (product_map f g).comp include_left = f := alg_hom.ext $ by simp
lemma product_map_right_apply (b : B) : product_map f g (include_right b) = g b := by simp
@[simp] lemma product_map_right : (product_map f g).comp include_right = g := alg_hom.ext $ by simp
lemma product_map_range : (product_map f g).range = f.range ⊔ g.range :=
by rw [product_map, alg_hom.range_comp, map_range, map_sup, ←alg_hom.range_comp,
←alg_hom.range_comp, ←alg_hom.comp_assoc, ←alg_hom.comp_assoc, lmul'_comp_include_left,
lmul'_comp_include_right, alg_hom.id_comp, alg_hom.id_comp]
end
section
variables {R A A' B S : Type*}
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A] [semiring A'] [semiring B] [comm_semiring S]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R A'] [algebra A A'] [is_scalar_tower R A A'] [algebra R B]
variables [algebra R S] [algebra A S] [is_scalar_tower R A S]
/-- If `A`, `B` are `R`-algebras, `A'` is an `A`-algebra, then the product map of `f : A' →ₐ[A] S`
and `g : B →ₐ[R] S` is an `A`-algebra homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def product_left_alg_hom (f : A' →ₐ[A] S) (g : B →ₐ[R] S) : A' ⊗[R] B →ₐ[A] S :=
{ commutes' := λ r, by { dsimp, simp },
..(product_map (f.restrict_scalars R) g).to_ring_hom }
end
section basis
variables {k : Type*} [comm_ring k] (R : Type*) [ring R] [algebra k R] {M : Type*}
[add_comm_monoid M] [module k M] {ι : Type*} (b : basis ι k M)
/-- Given a `k`-algebra `R` and a `k`-basis of `M,` this is a `k`-linear isomorphism
`R ⊗[k] M ≃ (ι →₀ R)` (which is in fact `R`-linear). -/
noncomputable def basis_aux : R ⊗[k] M ≃ₗ[k] (ι →₀ R) :=
(_root_.tensor_product.congr (finsupp.linear_equiv.finsupp_unique k R punit).symm b.repr) ≪≫ₗ
(finsupp_tensor_finsupp k R k punit ι).trans (finsupp.lcongr (equiv.unique_prod ι punit)
(_root_.tensor_product.rid k R))
variables {R}
lemma basis_aux_tmul (r : R) (m : M) :
basis_aux R b (r ⊗ₜ m) = r • (finsupp.map_range (algebra_map k R)
(map_zero _) (b.repr m)) :=
begin
ext,
simp [basis_aux, ←algebra.commutes, algebra.smul_def],
end
lemma basis_aux_map_smul (r : R) (x : R ⊗[k] M) :
basis_aux R b (r • x) = r • basis_aux R b x :=
tensor_product.induction_on x (by simp) (λ x y, by simp only [tensor_product.smul_tmul',
basis_aux_tmul, smul_assoc]) (λ x y hx hy, by simp [hx, hy])
variables (R)
/-- Given a `k`-algebra `R`, this is the `R`-basis of `R ⊗[k] M` induced by a `k`-basis of `M`. -/
noncomputable def basis : basis ι R (R ⊗[k] M) :=
{ repr := { map_smul' := basis_aux_map_smul b, .. basis_aux R b } }
variables {R}
@[simp] lemma basis_repr_tmul (r : R) (m : M) :
(basis R b).repr (r ⊗ₜ m) = r • (finsupp.map_range (algebra_map k R) (map_zero _) (b.repr m)) :=
basis_aux_tmul _ _ _
@[simp] lemma basis_repr_symm_apply (r : R) (i : ι) :
(basis R b).repr.symm (finsupp.single i r) = r ⊗ₜ b.repr.symm (finsupp.single i 1) :=
by simp [basis, equiv.unique_prod_symm_apply, basis_aux]
end basis
end tensor_product
end algebra
namespace module
variables {R M N : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N]
variables [module R M] [module R N]
/-- The algebra homomorphism from `End M ⊗ End N` to `End (M ⊗ N)` sending `f ⊗ₜ g` to
the `tensor_product.map f g`, the tensor product of the two maps. -/
def End_tensor_End_alg_hom : (End R M) ⊗[R] (End R N) →ₐ[R] End R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
begin
refine algebra.tensor_product.alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product
(hom_tensor_hom_map R M N M N) _ _,
{ intros f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂,
simp only [hom_tensor_hom_map_apply, tensor_product.map_mul] },
{ intro r,
simp only [hom_tensor_hom_map_apply],
ext m n, simp [smul_tmul] }
end
lemma End_tensor_End_alg_hom_apply (f : End R M) (g : End R N) :
End_tensor_End_alg_hom (f ⊗ₜ[R] g) = tensor_product.map f g :=
by simp only [End_tensor_End_alg_hom,
algebra.tensor_product.alg_hom_of_linear_map_tensor_product_apply, hom_tensor_hom_map_apply]
end module
lemma subalgebra.finite_dimensional_sup {K L : Type*} [field K] [comm_ring L] [algebra K L]
(E1 E2 : subalgebra K L) [finite_dimensional K E1] [finite_dimensional K E2] :
finite_dimensional K ↥(E1 ⊔ E2) :=
begin
rw [←E1.range_val, ←E2.range_val, ←algebra.tensor_product.product_map_range],
exact (algebra.tensor_product.product_map E1.val E2.val).to_linear_map.finite_dimensional_range,
end
namespace tensor_product.algebra
variables {R A B M : Type*}
variables [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
variables [semiring A] [semiring B] [module A M] [module B M]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
variables [is_scalar_tower R A M] [is_scalar_tower R B M]
/-- An auxiliary definition, used for constructing the `module (A ⊗[R] B) M` in
`tensor_product.algebra.module` below. -/
def module_aux : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] M :=
tensor_product.lift
{ to_fun := λ a, a • (algebra.lsmul R M : B →ₐ[R] module.End R M).to_linear_map,
map_add' := λ r t, by { ext, simp only [add_smul, linear_map.add_apply] },
map_smul' := λ n r, by { ext, simp only [ring_hom.id_apply, linear_map.smul_apply, smul_assoc] } }
lemma module_aux_apply (a : A) (b : B) (m : M) :
module_aux (a ⊗ₜ[R] b) m = a • b • m :=
by simp [module_aux]
variables [smul_comm_class A B M]
/-- If `M` is a representation of two different `R`-algebras `A` and `B` whose actions commute,
then it is a representation the `R`-algebra `A ⊗[R] B`.
An important example arises from a semiring `S`; allowing `S` to act on itself via left and right
multiplication, the roles of `R`, `A`, `B`, `M` are played by `ℕ`, `S`, `Sᵐᵒᵖ`, `S`. This example
is important because a submodule of `S` as a `module` over `S ⊗[ℕ] Sᵐᵒᵖ` is a two-sided ideal.
NB: This is not an instance because in the case `B = A` and `M = A ⊗[R] A` we would have a diamond
of `smul` actions. Furthermore, this would not be a mere definitional diamond but a true
mathematical diamond in which `A ⊗[R] A` had two distinct scalar actions on itself: one from its
multiplication, and one from this would-be instance. Arguably we could live with this but in any
case the real fix is to address the ambiguity in notation, probably along the lines outlined here:
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/144837-PR-reviews/topic/.234773.20base.20change/near/240929258
-/
protected def module : module (A ⊗[R] B) M :=
{ smul := λ x m, module_aux x m,
zero_smul := λ m, by simp only [map_zero, linear_map.zero_apply],
smul_zero := λ x, by simp only [map_zero],
smul_add := λ x m₁ m₂, by simp only [map_add],
add_smul := λ x y m, by simp only [map_add, linear_map.add_apply],
one_smul := λ m, by simp only [module_aux_apply, algebra.tensor_product.one_def, one_smul],
mul_smul := λ x y m,
begin
apply tensor_product.induction_on x;
apply tensor_product.induction_on y,
{ simp only [mul_zero, map_zero, linear_map.zero_apply], },
{ intros a b, simp only [zero_mul, map_zero, linear_map.zero_apply], },
{ intros z w hz hw, simp only [zero_mul, map_zero, linear_map.zero_apply], },
{ intros a b, simp only [mul_zero, map_zero, linear_map.zero_apply], },
{ intros a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂,
simp only [module_aux_apply, mul_smul, smul_comm a₁ b₂, algebra.tensor_product.tmul_mul_tmul,
linear_map.mul_apply], },
{ intros z w hz hw a b,
simp only at hz hw,
simp only [mul_add, hz, hw, map_add, linear_map.add_apply], },
{ intros z w hz hw, simp only [mul_zero, map_zero, linear_map.zero_apply], },
{ intros a b z w hz hw,
simp only at hz hw,
simp only [map_add, add_mul, linear_map.add_apply, hz, hw], },
{ intros u v hu hv z w hz hw,
simp only at hz hw,
simp only [add_mul, hz, hw, map_add, linear_map.add_apply], },
end }
local attribute [instance] tensor_product.algebra.module
lemma smul_def (a : A) (b : B) (m : M) : (a ⊗ₜ[R] b) • m = a • b • m := module_aux_apply a b m
end tensor_product.algebra
|
dfd44313f88b18781c71f71fa79316eda8e5a1c2 | 037dba89703a79cd4a4aec5e959818147f97635d | /src/2020/relations/lattice.lean | 1515f825fc336cba81cbb093ed5b5b979ad6607f | [] | no_license | ImperialCollegeLondon/M40001_lean | 3a6a09298da395ab51bc220a535035d45bbe919b | 62a76fa92654c855af2b2fc2bef8e60acd16ccec | refs/heads/master | 1,666,750,403,259 | 1,665,771,117,000 | 1,665,771,117,000 | 209,141,835 | 115 | 12 | null | 1,640,270,596,000 | 1,568,749,174,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 146 | lean | -- equivalence relations form a complete lattice.
-- binary intersection
-- binary union doens't work
-- but semilattice inf top and bot works
|
5f90f4946e12f5472a7ab8681233ce6f6c717da2 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/finset1.lean | 9772dfcae906798eb132da4d39089d13331635e7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,138 | lean | exit
import data.finset algebra.function algebra.binary
open nat list finset function binary
variable {A : Type}
-- TODO define for group
definition bigsum (s : finset A) (f : A → nat) : nat :=
acc (compose_right nat.add f) (right_commutative_compose_right nat.add f nat.add.right_comm) 0 s
definition bigprod (s : finset A) (f : A → nat) : nat :=
acc (compose_right nat.mul f) (right_commutative_compose_right nat.mul f nat.mul.right_comm) 1 s
definition bigand (s : finset A) (p : A → Prop) : Prop :=
acc (compose_right and p) (right_commutative_compose_right and p (λ a b c, propext (and.right_comm a b c))) true s
definition bigor (s : finset A) (p : A → Prop) : Prop :=
acc (compose_right or p) (right_commutative_compose_right or p (λ a b c, propext (or.right_comm a b c))) false s
example : to_finset [1, 3, 1] = to_finset [3, 3, 3, 1] :=
dec_trivial
example : to_finset [1, 2] ∪ to_finset [1, 3] = to_finset [3, 2, 1] :=
dec_trivial
example : 1 ∈ to_finset [3, 2, 1] :=
dec_trivial
example : bigsum (to_finset [3, 2, 2]) (λ x, x*x) = 13 :=
rfl
example : bigprod (to_finset [1, 2]) (λ x, x+1) = 6 :=
rfl
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.