blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
302dc082b81c57cad788fddb2efc8698092fe3bb | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/analysis/convex/extrema.lean | 8f2b298b1ffbcccecd9606a21153e120a66b40a8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,492 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import analysis.convex.function
import topology.algebra.affine
import topology.local_extr
import topology.instances.real
/-!
# Minima and maxima of convex functions
We show that if a function `f : E → β` is convex, then a local minimum is also
a global minimum, and likewise for concave functions.
-/
variables {E β : Type*} [add_comm_group E] [topological_space E]
[module ℝ E] [topological_add_group E] [has_continuous_smul ℝ E]
[linear_ordered_add_comm_group β] [module ℝ β] [ordered_smul ℝ β]
{s : set E}
open set filter
open_locale classical
/--
Helper lemma for the more general case: `is_min_on.of_is_local_min_on_of_convex_on`.
-/
lemma is_min_on.of_is_local_min_on_of_convex_on_Icc {f : ℝ → β} {a b : ℝ} (a_lt_b : a < b)
(h_local_min : is_local_min_on f (Icc a b) a) (h_conv : convex_on ℝ (Icc a b) f) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f a ≤ f x :=
begin
by_contradiction H_cont,
push_neg at H_cont,
rcases H_cont with ⟨x, ⟨h_ax, h_xb⟩, fx_lt_fa⟩,
obtain ⟨z, hz, ge_on_nhd⟩ : ∃ z > a, ∀ y ∈ (Icc a z), f y ≥ f a,
{ rcases eventually_iff_exists_mem.mp h_local_min with ⟨U, U_in_nhds_within, fy_ge_fa⟩,
rw [nhds_within_Icc_eq_nhds_within_Ici a_lt_b, mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Icc_subset]
at U_in_nhds_within,
rcases U_in_nhds_within with ⟨ε, ε_in_Ioi, Ioc_in_U⟩,
exact ⟨ε, mem_Ioi.mp ε_in_Ioi, λ y y_in_Ioc, fy_ge_fa y $ Ioc_in_U y_in_Ioc⟩ },
have a_lt_x : a < x := lt_of_le_of_ne h_ax (λ H, by subst H; exact lt_irrefl (f a) fx_lt_fa),
have lt_on_nhd : ∀ y ∈ Ioc a x, f y < f a,
{ intros y y_in_Ioc,
rcases (convex.mem_Ioc a_lt_x).mp y_in_Ioc with ⟨ya, yx, ya_pos, yx_pos, yax, y_combo⟩,
calc
f y = f (ya * a + yx * x) : by rw [y_combo]
... ≤ ya • f a + yx • f x
: h_conv.2 (left_mem_Icc.mpr (le_of_lt a_lt_b)) ⟨h_ax, h_xb⟩ (ya_pos)
(le_of_lt yx_pos) yax
... < ya • f a + yx • f a : add_lt_add_left (smul_lt_smul_of_pos fx_lt_fa yx_pos) _
... = f a : by rw [←add_smul, yax, one_smul] },
by_cases h_xz : x ≤ z,
{ exact not_lt_of_ge (ge_on_nhd x (show x ∈ Icc a z, by exact ⟨h_ax, h_xz⟩)) fx_lt_fa, },
{ have h₁ : z ∈ Ioc a x := ⟨hz, le_of_not_ge h_xz⟩,
have h₂ : z ∈ Icc a z := ⟨le_of_lt hz, le_refl z⟩,
exact not_lt_of_ge (ge_on_nhd z h₂) (lt_on_nhd z h₁) }
end
/--
A local minimum of a convex function is a global minimum, restricted to a set `s`.
-/
lemma is_min_on.of_is_local_min_on_of_convex_on {f : E → β} {a : E}
(a_in_s : a ∈ s) (h_localmin : is_local_min_on f s a) (h_conv : convex_on ℝ s f) :
∀ x ∈ s, f a ≤ f x :=
begin
by_contradiction H_cont,
push_neg at H_cont,
rcases H_cont with ⟨x, ⟨x_in_s, fx_lt_fa⟩⟩,
let g : ℝ →ᵃ[ℝ] E := affine_map.line_map a x,
have hg0 : g 0 = a := affine_map.line_map_apply_zero a x,
have hg1 : g 1 = x := affine_map.line_map_apply_one a x,
have fg_local_min_on : is_local_min_on (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) 0,
{ rw ←hg0 at h_localmin,
refine is_local_min_on.comp_continuous_on h_localmin subset.rfl
(continuous.continuous_on (affine_map.line_map_continuous)) _,
simp [mem_preimage, hg0, a_in_s] },
have fg_min_on : ∀ x ∈ (Icc 0 1 : set ℝ), (f ∘ g) 0 ≤ (f ∘ g) x,
{ have Icc_in_s' : Icc 0 1 ⊆ (g ⁻¹' s),
{ have h0 : (0 : ℝ) ∈ (g ⁻¹' s) := by simp [mem_preimage, a_in_s],
have h1 : (1 : ℝ) ∈ (g ⁻¹' s) := by simp [mem_preimage, hg1, x_in_s],
rw ←segment_eq_Icc (show (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1, by linarith),
exact (convex.affine_preimage g h_conv.1).segment_subset
(by simp [mem_preimage, hg0, a_in_s]) (by simp [mem_preimage, hg1, x_in_s]) },
have fg_local_min_on' : is_local_min_on (f ∘ g) (Icc 0 1) 0 :=
is_local_min_on.on_subset fg_local_min_on Icc_in_s',
refine is_min_on.of_is_local_min_on_of_convex_on_Icc (by linarith) fg_local_min_on' _,
exact (convex_on.comp_affine_map g h_conv).subset Icc_in_s' (convex_Icc 0 1) },
have gx_lt_ga : (f ∘ g) 1 < (f ∘ g) 0 := by simp [hg1, fx_lt_fa, hg0],
exact not_lt_of_ge (fg_min_on 1 (mem_Icc.mpr ⟨zero_le_one, le_refl 1⟩)) gx_lt_ga,
end
/-- A local maximum of a concave function is a global maximum, restricted to a set `s`. -/
lemma is_max_on.of_is_local_max_on_of_concave_on {f : E → β} {a : E}
(a_in_s : a ∈ s) (h_localmax: is_local_max_on f s a) (h_conc : concave_on ℝ s f) :
∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ f a :=
@is_min_on.of_is_local_min_on_of_convex_on
_ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s f a a_in_s h_localmax h_conc
/-- A local minimum of a convex function is a global minimum. -/
lemma is_min_on.of_is_local_min_of_convex_univ {f : E → β} {a : E}
(h_local_min : is_local_min f a) (h_conv : convex_on ℝ univ f) : ∀ x, f a ≤ f x :=
λ x, (is_min_on.of_is_local_min_on_of_convex_on (mem_univ a)
(is_local_min.on h_local_min univ) h_conv) x (mem_univ x)
/-- A local maximum of a concave function is a global maximum. -/
lemma is_max_on.of_is_local_max_of_convex_univ {f : E → β} {a : E}
(h_local_max : is_local_max f a) (h_conc : concave_on ℝ univ f) : ∀ x, f x ≤ f a :=
@is_min_on.of_is_local_min_of_convex_univ _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f a h_local_max h_conc
|
b53dbfa2287e19c7483df41ba4bce243bb0a6e5b | abd85493667895c57a7507870867b28124b3998f | /src/data/support.lean | d04abbb47af9b51f9b6d6f2fb4ccbaa796e74125 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pechersky/mathlib | d56eef16bddb0bfc8bc552b05b7270aff5944393 | f1df14c2214ee114c9738e733efd5de174deb95d | refs/heads/master | 1,666,714,392,571 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 1,591,747,567,000 | 270,557,274 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,591,597,975,000 | 1,591,597,974,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,756 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import order.conditionally_complete_lattice
import algebra.big_operators
/-!
# Support of a function
In this file we define `function.support f = {x | f x ≠ 0}` and prove its basic properties.
-/
universes u v w x y
open set
open_locale big_operators
namespace function
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {A : Type x} {B : Type y}
/-- `support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 0`. -/
def support [has_zero A] (f : α → A) : set α := {x | f x ≠ 0}
lemma nmem_support [has_zero A] {f : α → A} {x : α} :
x ∉ support f ↔ f x = 0 :=
classical.not_not
lemma support_binop_subset [has_zero A] (op : A → A → A) (op0 : op 0 0 = 0) (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, op (f x) (g x)) ⊆ support f ∪ support g :=
λ x hx, classical.by_cases
(λ hf : f x = 0, or.inr $ λ hg, hx $ by simp only [hf, hg, op0])
or.inl
lemma support_add [add_monoid A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, f x + g x) ⊆ support f ∪ support g :=
support_binop_subset (+) (zero_add _) f g
@[simp] lemma support_neg [add_group A] (f : α → A) :
support (λ x, -f x) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr neg_eq_zero
lemma support_sub [add_group A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, f x - g x) ⊆ support f ∪ support g :=
support_binop_subset (has_sub.sub) (sub_self _) f g
@[simp] lemma support_mul [domain A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, f x * g x) = support f ∩ support g :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [support, ne.def, mul_eq_zero, mem_set_of_eq,
mem_inter_iff, not_or_distrib]
@[simp] lemma support_mul' {A} [group_with_zero A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, f x * g x) = support f ∩ support g :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [support, ne.def, mul_eq_zero_iff', mem_set_of_eq,
mem_inter_iff, not_or_distrib]
@[simp] lemma support_inv [division_ring A] (f : α → A) :
support (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr inv_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma support_div [division_ring A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, f x / g x) = support f ∩ support g :=
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma support_sup [has_zero A] [semilattice_sup A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, (f x) ⊔ (g x)) ⊆ support f ∪ support g :=
support_binop_subset (⊔) sup_idem f g
lemma support_inf [has_zero A] [semilattice_inf A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, (f x) ⊓ (g x)) ⊆ support f ∪ support g :=
support_binop_subset (⊓) inf_idem f g
lemma support_max [has_zero A] [decidable_linear_order A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, max (f x) (g x)) ⊆ support f ∪ support g :=
support_sup f g
lemma support_min [has_zero A] [decidable_linear_order A] (f g : α → A) :
support (λ x, min (f x) (g x)) ⊆ support f ∪ support g :=
support_inf f g
lemma support_supr [has_zero A] [conditionally_complete_lattice A] [nonempty ι] (f : ι → α → A) :
support (λ x, ⨆ i, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i, support (f i) :=
begin
intros x hx,
classical,
contrapose hx,
simp only [mem_Union, not_exists, nmem_support] at hx ⊢,
simp only [hx, csupr_const]
end
lemma support_infi [has_zero A] [conditionally_complete_lattice A] [nonempty ι] (f : ι → α → A) :
support (λ x, ⨅ i, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i, support (f i) :=
@support_supr _ _ (order_dual A) ⟨(0:A)⟩ _ _ f
lemma support_sum [add_comm_monoid A] (s : finset α) (f : α → β → A) :
support (λ x, s.sum (λ i, f i x)) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ s, support (f i) :=
begin
intros x hx,
classical,
contrapose hx,
simp only [mem_Union, not_exists, nmem_support] at hx ⊢,
exact finset.sum_eq_zero hx
end
-- TODO: Drop `classical` once #2332 is merged
lemma support_prod [integral_domain A] (s : finset α) (f : α → β → A) :
support (λ x, ∏ i in s, f i x) = ⋂ i ∈ s, support (f i) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by classical;
simp only [support, ne.def, finset.prod_eq_zero_iff, mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_Inter, not_exists]
lemma support_comp [has_zero A] [has_zero B] (g : A → B) (hg : g 0 = 0) (f : α → A) :
support (g ∘ f) ⊆ support f :=
λ x, mt $ λ h, by simp [(∘), *]
lemma support_comp' [has_zero A] [has_zero B] (g : A → B) (hg : g 0 = 0) (f : α → A) :
support (λ x, g (f x)) ⊆ support f :=
support_comp g hg f
lemma support_comp_eq [has_zero A] [has_zero B] (g : A → B) (hg : ∀ {x}, g x = 0 ↔ x = 0)
(f : α → A) :
support (g ∘ f) = support f :=
set.ext $ λ x, not_congr hg
lemma support_comp_eq' [has_zero A] [has_zero B] (g : A → B) (hg : ∀ {x}, g x = 0 ↔ x = 0)
(f : α → A) :
support (λ x, g (f x)) = support f :=
support_comp_eq g @hg f
end function
|
cfad6948838841225b7d0e86f263e3a26e655831 | 8e31b9e0d8cec76b5aa1e60a240bbd557d01047c | /scratch/refactor_iterate.lean | 8950cefe1a52acfe10e1cf1b1c28957a2c13406a | [] | no_license | ChrisHughes24/LP | 7bdd62cb648461c67246457f3ddcb9518226dd49 | e3ed64c2d1f642696104584e74ae7226d8e916de | refs/heads/master | 1,685,642,642,858 | 1,578,070,602,000 | 1,578,070,602,000 | 195,268,102 | 4 | 3 | null | 1,569,229,518,000 | 1,562,255,287,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 83,876 | lean | import data.matrix.pequiv data.rat.basic tactic.fin_cases data.list.min_max partition
import order.lexicographic
open matrix fintype finset function pequiv
local notation `rvec`:2000 n := matrix (fin 1) (fin n) ℚ
local notation `cvec`:2000 m := matrix (fin m) (fin 1) ℚ
local infix ` ⬝ `:70 := matrix.mul
local postfix `ᵀ` : 1500 := transpose
section
universes u v
variables {l m n o : Type u} [fintype l] [fintype m] [fintype n] [fintype o] {R : Type v}
/- Belongs in mathlib -/
lemma mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq [semiring R] {M : matrix l m R} {N : matrix m n R} {O : matrix l n R}
{P : matrix n o R} (h : M ⬝ N = O) : M ⬝ (N ⬝ P) = O ⬝ P :=
by rw [← matrix.mul_assoc, h]
end
variables {m n : ℕ}
/-- The tableau consists of a matrix and a kant `const` column.
`to_partition` stores the indices of the current row and column variables.
`restricted` is the set of variables that are restricted to be nonnegative -/
structure tableau (m n : ℕ) :=
(to_matrix : matrix (fin m) (fin n) ℚ)
(const : cvec m)
(to_partition : partition m n)
(restricted : finset (fin (m + n)))
namespace tableau
open partition
section predicates
variable (T : tableau m n)
/-- The affine subspace represented by the tableau ignoring nonnegativity restrictiions -/
def flat : set (cvec (m + n)) :=
{ x | T.to_partition.rowp.to_matrix ⬝ x = T.to_matrix ⬝ T.to_partition.colp.to_matrix ⬝ x + T.const }
/-- The sol_set is the subset of ℚ^(m+n) that satisifies the tableau -/
def sol_set : set (cvec (m + n)) := flat T ∩ { x | ∀ i, i ∈ T.restricted → 0 ≤ x i 0 }
/-- Predicate for a variable being unbounded above in the `sol_set` -/
def is_unbounded_above (i : fin (m + n)) : Prop :=
∀ q : ℚ, ∃ x : cvec (m + n), x ∈ sol_set T ∧ q ≤ x i 0
/-- Predicate for a variable being unbounded below in the `sol_set` -/
def is_unbounded_below (i : fin (m + n)) : Prop :=
∀ q : ℚ, ∃ x : cvec (m + n), x ∈ sol_set T ∧ x i 0 ≤ q
def is_optimal (x : cvec (m + n)) (i : fin (m + n)) : Prop :=
x ∈ T.sol_set ∧ ∀ y : cvec (m + n), y ∈ sol_set T → y i 0 ≤ x i 0
/-- Is this equivalent to `∀ (x : cvec (m + n)), x ∈ sol_set T → x i 0 = x j 0`? No -/
def equal_in_flat (i j : fin (m + n)) : Prop :=
∀ (x : cvec (m + n)), x ∈ flat T → x i 0 = x j 0
/-- Returns an element of the `flat` after assigning values to the column variables -/
def of_col (T : tableau m n) (x : cvec n) : cvec (m + n) :=
T.to_partition.colp.to_matrixᵀ ⬝ x + T.to_partition.rowp.to_matrixᵀ ⬝ (T.to_matrix ⬝ x + T.const)
/-- A `tableau` is feasible if its `const` column is nonnegative in restricted rows -/
def feasible : Prop :=
∀ i, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → 0 ≤ T.const i 0
instance : decidable_pred (@feasible m n) := λ _, by dunfold feasible; apply_instance
/-- Given a row index `r` and a column index `s` it returns a tableau with `r` and `s` switched,
but with the same `sol_set` -/
def pivot (r : fin m) (c : fin n) : tableau m n :=
let p := (T.to_matrix r c)⁻¹ in
{ to_matrix := λ i j,
if i = r
then if j = c
then p
else -T.to_matrix r j * p
else if j = c
then T.to_matrix i c * p
else T.to_matrix i j - T.to_matrix i c * T.to_matrix r j * p,
to_partition := T.to_partition.swap r c,
const := λ i k,
if i = r
then -T.const r k * p
else T.const i k - T.to_matrix i c * T.const r k * p,
restricted := T.restricted }
end predicates
section predicate_lemmas
variable {T : tableau m n}
lemma mem_flat_iff {x : cvec (m + n)} : x ∈ T.flat ↔
∀ r, x (T.to_partition.rowg r) 0 = univ.sum
(λ c : fin n, T.to_matrix r c * x (T.to_partition.colg c) 0) +
T.const r 0 :=
have hx : x ∈ T.flat ↔ ∀ i, (T.to_partition.rowp.to_matrix ⬝ x) i 0 =
(T.to_matrix ⬝ T.to_partition.colp.to_matrix ⬝ x + T.const) i 0,
by rw [flat, set.mem_set_of_eq, matrix.ext_iff.symm, forall_swap,
unique.forall_iff];
refl,
begin
rw hx,
refine forall_congr (λ i, _),
rw [mul_matrix_apply, add_val, rowp_eq_some_rowg, matrix.mul_assoc, matrix.mul],
conv in (T.to_matrix _ _ * (T.to_partition.colp.to_matrix ⬝ x) _ _)
{ rw [mul_matrix_apply, colp_eq_some_colg] },
end
variable (T)
@[simp] lemma colp_mul_of_col (x : cvec n) :
T.to_partition.colp.to_matrix ⬝ of_col T x = x :=
by simp [matrix.mul_assoc, matrix.mul_add, of_col, flat,
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (rowp_mul_colp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (rowp_mul_rowp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (colp_mul_colp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (colp_mul_rowp_transpose _)]
@[simp] lemma rowp_mul_of_col (x : cvec n) :
T.to_partition.rowp.to_matrix ⬝ of_col T x = T.to_matrix ⬝ x + T.const :=
by simp [matrix.mul_assoc, matrix.mul_add, of_col, flat,
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (rowp_mul_colp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (rowp_mul_rowp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (colp_mul_colp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (colp_mul_rowp_transpose _)]
lemma of_col_mem_flat (x : cvec n) : T.of_col x ∈ T.flat :=
by simp [matrix.mul_assoc, matrix.mul_add, flat]
@[simp] lemma of_col_colg (x : cvec n) (c : fin n) :
of_col T x (T.to_partition.colg c) = x c :=
funext $ λ v,
calc of_col T x (T.to_partition.colg c) v =
(T.to_partition.colp.to_matrix ⬝ of_col T x) c v :
by rw [mul_matrix_apply, colp_eq_some_colg]
... = x c v : by rw [colp_mul_of_col]
lemma of_col_rowg (c : cvec n) (r : fin m) :
of_col T c (T.to_partition.rowg r) = (T.to_matrix ⬝ c + T.const) r :=
funext $ λ v,
calc of_col T c (T.to_partition.rowg r) v =
(T.to_partition.rowp.to_matrix ⬝ of_col T c) r v :
by rw [mul_matrix_apply, rowp_eq_some_rowg]
... = (T.to_matrix ⬝ c + T.const) r v : by rw [rowp_mul_of_col]
variable {T}
lemma of_col_single_rowg {q : ℚ} {r c} {k} :
T.of_col (q • (single c 0).to_matrix) (T.to_partition.rowg r) k =
q * T.to_matrix r c + T.const r k:=
begin
fin_cases k,
erw [of_col_rowg, matrix.mul_smul, matrix.add_val, matrix.smul_val,
matrix_mul_apply, pequiv.symm_single_apply]
end
/-- Condition for the solution given by setting column index `j` to `q` and all other columns to
zero being in the `sol_set` -/
lemma of_col_single_mem_sol_set {q : ℚ} {c : fin n} (hT : T.feasible)
(hi : ∀ i, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → 0 ≤ q * T.to_matrix i c)
(hj : T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted ∨ 0 ≤ q) :
T.of_col (q • (single c 0).to_matrix) ∈ T.sol_set :=
⟨of_col_mem_flat _ _,
λ v, (T.to_partition.eq_rowg_or_colg v).elim
begin
rintros ⟨r, hr⟩ hres,
subst hr,
rw [of_col_single_rowg],
exact add_nonneg (hi _ hres) (hT _ hres)
end
begin
rintros ⟨j, hj⟩ hres,
subst hj,
simp [of_col_colg, smul_val, pequiv.single, pequiv.to_matrix],
by_cases hjc : j = c; simp [*, le_refl] at *
end⟩
@[simp] lemma of_col_zero_mem_sol_set_iff : T.of_col 0 ∈ T.sol_set ↔ T.feasible :=
suffices (∀ v : fin (m + n), v ∈ T.restricted → (0 : ℚ) ≤ T.of_col 0 v 0) ↔
(∀ i : fin m, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → 0 ≤ T.const i 0),
by simpa [sol_set, feasible, of_col_mem_flat],
⟨λ h i hi, by simpa [of_col_rowg] using h _ hi,
λ h v hv, (T.to_partition.eq_rowg_or_colg v).elim
(by rintros ⟨i, hi⟩; subst hi; simp [of_col_rowg]; tauto)
(by rintros ⟨j, hj⟩; subst hj; simp)⟩
lemma is_unbounded_above_colg_aux {c : fin n} (hT : T.feasible)
(h : ∀ i : fin m, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → 0 ≤ T.to_matrix i c) (q : ℚ):
of_col T (max q 0 • (single c 0).to_matrix) ∈ sol_set T ∧
q ≤ of_col T (max q 0 • (single c 0).to_matrix) (T.to_partition.colg c) 0 :=
⟨of_col_single_mem_sol_set hT (λ i hi, mul_nonneg (le_max_right _ _) (h _ hi))
(or.inr (le_max_right _ _)),
by simp [of_col_colg, smul_val, pequiv.single, pequiv.to_matrix, le_refl q]⟩
/-- A column variable is unbounded above if it is in a column where every negative entry is
in a row owned by an unrestricted variable -/
lemma is_unbounded_above_colg {c : fin n} (hT : T.feasible)
(h : ∀ i : fin m, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → 0 ≤ T.to_matrix i c) :
T.is_unbounded_above (T.to_partition.colg c) :=
λ q, ⟨_, is_unbounded_above_colg_aux hT h q⟩
lemma is_unbounded_below_colg_aux {c : fin n} (hT : T.feasible)
(hres : T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted)
(h : ∀ i : fin m, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → T.to_matrix i c ≤ 0) (q : ℚ) :
of_col T (min q 0 • (single c 0).to_matrix) ∈ sol_set T ∧
of_col T (min q 0 • (single c 0).to_matrix) (T.to_partition.colg c) 0 ≤ q :=
⟨of_col_single_mem_sol_set hT
(λ i hi, mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (min_le_right _ _) (h _ hi))
(or.inl hres),
by simp [of_col_colg, smul_val, pequiv.single, pequiv.to_matrix, le_refl q]⟩
/-- A column variable is unbounded below if it is unrestricted and it is in a column where every
positive entry is in a row owned by an unrestricted variable -/
lemma is_unbounded_below_colg {c : fin n} (hT : T.feasible)
(hres : T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted)
(h : ∀ i : fin m, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → T.to_matrix i c ≤ 0) :
T.is_unbounded_below (T.to_partition.colg c) :=
λ q, ⟨_, is_unbounded_below_colg_aux hT hres h q⟩
/-- A row variable `r` is unbounded above if it is unrestricted and there is a column `s`
where every restricted row variable has a nonpositive entry in that column, and
`r` has a negative entry in that column. -/
lemma is_unbounded_above_rowg_of_nonpos {r : fin m} (hT : T.feasible) (s : fin n)
(hres : T.to_partition.colg s ∉ T.restricted)
(h : ∀ i : fin m, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → T.to_matrix i s ≤ 0)
(his : T.to_matrix r s < 0) : is_unbounded_above T (T.to_partition.rowg r) :=
λ q, ⟨T.of_col (min ((q - T.const r 0) / T.to_matrix r s) 0 • (single s 0).to_matrix),
of_col_single_mem_sol_set hT
(λ i' hi', mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (min_le_right _ _) (h _ hi'))
(or.inl hres),
begin
rw [of_col_rowg, add_val, matrix.mul_smul, smul_val, matrix_mul_apply,
symm_single_apply],
cases le_total 0 ((q - T.const r 0) / T.to_matrix r s) with hq hq,
{ rw [min_eq_right hq],
rw [le_div_iff_of_neg his, zero_mul, sub_nonpos] at hq,
simpa },
{ rw [min_eq_left hq, div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_lt his)],
simp }
end⟩
/-- A row variable `r` is unbounded above if there is a column `s`
where every restricted row variable has a nonpositive entry in that column, and
`r` has a positive entry in that column. -/
lemma is_unbounded_above_rowg_of_nonneg {r : fin m} (hT : T.feasible) (s : fin n)
(hs : ∀ i : fin m, T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted → 0 ≤ T.to_matrix i s)
(his : 0 < T.to_matrix r s) : is_unbounded_above T (T.to_partition.rowg r) :=
λ q, ⟨T.of_col (max ((q - T.const r 0) / T.to_matrix r s) 0 • (single s 0).to_matrix),
of_col_single_mem_sol_set hT
(λ i hi, mul_nonneg (le_max_right _ _) (hs i hi))
(or.inr (le_max_right _ _)),
begin
rw [of_col_rowg, add_val, matrix.mul_smul, smul_val, matrix_mul_apply,
symm_single_apply],
cases le_total ((q - T.const r 0) / T.to_matrix r s) 0 with hq hq,
{ rw [max_eq_right hq],
rw [div_le_iff his, zero_mul, sub_nonpos] at hq,
simpa },
{ rw [max_eq_left hq, div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_gt his)],
simp }
end⟩
/-- The sample solution of a feasible tableau maximises the variable in row `r`,
if every entry in that row is nonpositive and every entry in that row owned by a restricted
variable is `0` -/
lemma is_optimal_of_col_zero {r : fin m} (hf : T.feasible)
(h : ∀ j, T.to_matrix r j ≤ 0 ∧ (T.to_partition.colg j ∉ T.restricted → T.to_matrix r j = 0)) :
T.is_optimal (T.of_col 0) (T.to_partition.rowg r) :=
⟨of_col_zero_mem_sol_set_iff.2 hf, λ x hx, begin
rw [of_col_rowg, matrix.mul_zero, zero_add, mem_flat_iff.1 hx.1],
refine add_le_of_nonpos_of_le _ (le_refl _),
refine sum_nonpos (λ j _, _),
by_cases hj : (T.to_partition.colg j) ∈ T.restricted,
{ refine mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (h _).1 (hx.2 _ hj) },
{ rw [(h _).2 hj, _root_.zero_mul] }
end⟩
lemma not_optimal_of_unbounded_above {v : fin (m + n)} {x : cvec (m + n)}
(hu : is_unbounded_above T v) : ¬is_optimal T x v :=
λ hm, let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hu (x v 0 + 1) in
not_le_of_gt (lt_add_one (x v 0)) (le_trans hy.2 (hm.2 y hy.1))
/-- Expression for the sum of all but one entries in the a row of a tableau. -/
lemma row_sum_erase_eq {x : cvec (m + n)} (hx : x ∈ T.flat) {r : fin m} {s : fin n} :
(univ.erase s).sum (λ j : fin n, T.to_matrix r j * x (T.to_partition.colg j) 0) =
x (T.to_partition.rowg r) 0 - T.const r 0 - T.to_matrix r s * x (T.to_partition.colg s) 0 :=
begin
rw [mem_flat_iff] at hx,
conv_rhs { rw [hx r, ← insert_erase (mem_univ s), sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _)] },
simp
end
/-- An expression for a column variable in terms of row variables. -/
lemma colg_eq {x : cvec (m + n)} (hx : x ∈ T.flat) {r : fin m} {s : fin n}
(hrs : T.to_matrix r s ≠ 0) : x (T.to_partition.colg s) 0 =
(x (T.to_partition.rowg r) 0
-(univ.erase s).sum (λ j : fin n, T.to_matrix r j * x (T.to_partition.colg j) 0)
- T.const r 0) * (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹ :=
by simp [row_sum_erase_eq hx, mul_left_comm (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹, mul_assoc,
mul_left_comm (T.to_matrix r s), mul_inv_cancel hrs]
/-- Another expression for a column variable in terms of row variables. -/
lemma colg_eq' {x : cvec (m + n)} (hx : x ∈ T.flat) {r : fin m} {s : fin n}
(hrs : T.to_matrix r s ≠ 0) : x (T.to_partition.colg s) 0 =
univ.sum (λ (j : fin n), (if j = s then (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹
else (-(T.to_matrix r j * (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹))) *
x (colg (swap (T.to_partition) r s) j) 0) -
(T.const r 0) * (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹ :=
have (univ.erase s).sum
(λ j : fin n, ite (j = s) (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹ (-(T.to_matrix r j * (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹)) *
x (colg (swap (T.to_partition) r s) j) 0) =
(univ.erase s).sum (λ j : fin n,
-T.to_matrix r j * x (T.to_partition.colg j) 0 * (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹),
from finset.sum_congr rfl $ λ j hj,
by simp [if_neg (mem_erase.1 hj).1, colg_swap_of_ne _ (mem_erase.1 hj).1,
mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm],
by rw [← finset.insert_erase (mem_univ s), finset.sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
if_pos rfl, colg_swap, colg_eq hx hrs, this, ← finset.sum_mul];
simp [_root_.add_mul, mul_comm, _root_.mul_add]
/-- Pivoting twice in the same place does nothing -/
@[simp] lemma pivot_pivot {r : fin m} {s : fin n} (hrs : T.to_matrix r s ≠ 0) :
(T.pivot r s).pivot r s = T :=
begin
cases T,
simp [pivot, function.funext_iff],
split; intros; split_ifs;
simp [*, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (T_to_matrix r s), mul_left_comm (T_to_matrix r s)⁻¹,
mul_comm (T_to_matrix r s), inv_mul_cancel hrs]
end
/- These two sets are equal_in_flat, the stronger lemma is `flat_pivot` -/
private lemma subset_flat_pivot {r : fin m} {s : fin n} (h : T.to_matrix r s ≠ 0) :
T.flat ⊆ (T.pivot r s).flat :=
λ x hx,
have ∀ i : fin m, (univ.erase s).sum (λ j : fin n,
ite (j = s) (T.to_matrix i s * (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹)
(T.to_matrix i j + -(T.to_matrix i s * T.to_matrix r j * (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹))
* x ((T.to_partition.swap r s).colg j) 0) =
(univ.erase s).sum (λ j : fin n, T.to_matrix i j * x (T.to_partition.colg j) 0 -
T.to_matrix r j *
x (T.to_partition.colg j) 0 * T.to_matrix i s * (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹),
from λ i, finset.sum_congr rfl (λ j hj,
by rw [if_neg (mem_erase.1 hj).1, colg_swap_of_ne _ (mem_erase.1 hj).1];
simp [mul_add, add_mul, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]),
begin
rw mem_flat_iff,
assume i,
by_cases hir : i = r,
{ rw eq_comm at hir,
subst hir,
dsimp [pivot],
simp [mul_inv_cancel h, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, if_true,
add_comm, mul_inv_cancel, rowg_swap, eq_self_iff_true, colg_eq' hx h],
congr, funext, congr },
{ dsimp [pivot],
simp only [if_neg hir],
rw [← insert_erase (mem_univ s), sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
if_pos rfl, colg_swap, this, sum_sub_distrib, ← sum_mul, ← sum_mul,
row_sum_erase_eq hx, rowg_swap_of_ne _ hir],
simp [row_sum_erase_eq hx, mul_add, add_mul,
mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc],
simp [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (T.to_matrix r s), mul_left_comm (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹,
mul_comm (T.to_matrix r s), inv_mul_cancel h] }
end
variable (T)
@[simp] lemma pivot_pivot_element (r : fin m) (s : fin n) :
(T.pivot r s).to_matrix r s = (T.to_matrix r s)⁻¹ :=
by simp [pivot, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] lemma pivot_pivot_row {r : fin m} {j s : fin n} (h : j ≠ s) :
(T.pivot r s).to_matrix r j = -T.to_matrix r j / T.to_matrix r s :=
by dsimp [pivot]; rw [if_pos rfl, if_neg h, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma pivot_pivot_column {i r : fin m} {s : fin n} (h : i ≠ r) :
(T.pivot r s).to_matrix i s = T.to_matrix i s / T.to_matrix r s :=
by dsimp [pivot]; rw [if_neg h, if_pos rfl, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma pivot_of_ne_of_ne {i r : fin m} {j s : fin n} (hir : i ≠ r)
(hjs : j ≠ s) : (T.pivot r s).to_matrix i j =
T.to_matrix i j - T.to_matrix i s * T.to_matrix r j / T.to_matrix r s :=
by dsimp [pivot]; rw [if_neg hir, if_neg hjs, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma const_pivot_row {r : fin m} {s : fin n} : (T.pivot r s).const r 0 =
-T.const r 0 / T.to_matrix r s :=
by simp [pivot, if_pos rfl, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma const_pivot_of_ne {i r : fin m} {s : fin n} (hir : i ≠ r) : (T.pivot r s).const i 0
= T.const i 0 - T.to_matrix i s * T.const r 0 / T.to_matrix r s :=
by dsimp [pivot]; rw [if_neg hir, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma restricted_pivot (r s) : (T.pivot r s).restricted = T.restricted := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_partition_pivot (r s) : (T.pivot r s).to_partition = T.to_partition.swap r s := rfl
variable {T}
@[simp] lemma flat_pivot {r : fin m} {s : fin n} (hrs : T.to_matrix r s ≠ 0) :
(T.pivot r s).flat = T.flat :=
set.subset.antisymm
(by conv_rhs { rw ← pivot_pivot hrs };
exact subset_flat_pivot (by simp [hrs]))
(subset_flat_pivot hrs)
@[simp] lemma sol_set_pivot {r : fin m} {s : fin n} (hrs : T.to_matrix r s ≠ 0) :
(T.pivot r s).sol_set = T.sol_set :=
by rw [sol_set, flat_pivot hrs]; refl
-- lemma feasible_pivot (hTf : T.feasible) {r : fin m} {s : fin n}
-- (hs : T.to_partition.colg s ∈ T.restricted → T.const r 0 / T.to_matrix r s ≤ 0)
-- (h : ∀ i : fin m, i ≠ r → T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted →
-- 0 ≤ T.const i 0 - T.to_matrix i s * T.const r 0 / T.to_matrix r s) :
-- (T.pivot r s).feasible :=
-- assume i hi,
-- if hir : i = r
-- then begin
-- subst hir,
-- rw [const_pivot_row],
-- simp at *,
-- end
-- else begin
-- rw [to_partition_pivot, rowg_swap_of_ne _ hir, restricted_pivot] at hi,
-- rw [const_pivot_of_ne _ hir, sub_nonneg, mul_div_assoc],
-- sorry
-- end
/-- Two row variables are `equal_in_flat` iff the corresponding rows of the tableau are equal -/
lemma equal_in_flat_row_row {i i' : fin m} :
T.equal_in_flat (T.to_partition.rowg i) (T.to_partition.rowg i')
↔ (T.const i 0 = T.const i' 0 ∧ ∀ j : fin n, T.to_matrix i j = T.to_matrix i' j) :=
⟨λ h, have Hconst : T.const i 0 = T.const i' 0,
by simpa [of_col_rowg] using h (T.of_col 0) (of_col_mem_flat _ _),
⟨Hconst,
λ j, begin
have := h (T.of_col (single j (0 : fin 1)).to_matrix) (of_col_mem_flat _ _),
rwa [of_col_rowg, of_col_rowg, add_val, add_val, matrix_mul_apply, matrix_mul_apply,
symm_single_apply, Hconst, add_right_cancel_iff] at this,
end⟩,
λ h x hx, by simp [mem_flat_iff.1 hx, h.1, h.2]⟩
/-- A row variable is equal_in_flat to a column variable iff its row has zeros, and a single
one in that column. -/
lemma equal_in_flat_row_col {i : fin m} {j : fin n} :
T.equal_in_flat (T.to_partition.rowg i) (T.to_partition.colg j)
↔ (∀ j', j' ≠ j → T.to_matrix i j' = 0) ∧ T.const i 0 = 0 ∧ T.to_matrix i j = 1 :=
⟨λ h, have Hconst : T.const i 0 = 0,
by simpa [of_col_rowg] using h (T.of_col 0) (of_col_mem_flat _ _),
⟨assume j' hj', begin
have := h (T.of_col (single j' (0 : fin 1)).to_matrix) (of_col_mem_flat _ _),
rwa [of_col_rowg, of_col_colg, add_val, Hconst, add_zero, matrix_mul_apply,
symm_single_apply, pequiv.to_matrix, single_apply_of_ne hj',
if_neg (option.not_mem_none _)] at this
end,
Hconst,
begin
have := h (T.of_col (single j (0 : fin 1)).to_matrix) (of_col_mem_flat _ _),
rwa [of_col_rowg, of_col_colg, add_val, Hconst, add_zero, matrix_mul_apply,
symm_single_apply, pequiv.to_matrix, single_apply] at this
end⟩,
by rintros ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ x hx;
rw [mem_flat_iff.1 hx, h₂, sum_eq_single j]; simp *; tauto⟩
lemma mul_single_ext {R : Type*} {m n : ℕ} [semiring R]
{A B : matrix (fin m) (fin n) R} (h : ∀ j : fin n, A ⬝ (single j (0 : fin 1)).to_matrix = B ⬝
(single j (0 : fin 1)).to_matrix) : A = B :=
by ext i j; simpa [matrix_mul_apply] using congr_fun (congr_fun (h j) i) 0
lemma single_mul_ext {R : Type*} {m n : ℕ} [semiring R]
{A B : matrix (fin m) (fin n) R} (h : ∀ i, (single (0 : fin 1) i).to_matrix ⬝ A =
(single (0 : fin 1) i).to_matrix ⬝ B) : A = B :=
by ext i j; simpa [mul_matrix_apply] using congr_fun (congr_fun (h i) 0) j
lemma ext {T₁ T₂ : tableau m n} (hflat : T₁.flat = T₂.flat)
(hpartition : T₁.to_partition = T₂.to_partition)
(hres : T₁.restricted = T₂.restricted) : T₁ = T₂ :=
have hconst : T₁.const = T₂.const,
by rw [set.ext_iff] at hflat; simpa [of_col, flat, hpartition, matrix.mul_assoc,
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (rowp_mul_rowp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (colp_mul_rowp_transpose _)] using
(hflat (T₁.of_col 0)).1 (of_col_mem_flat _ _),
have hmatrix : T₁.to_matrix = T₂.to_matrix,
from mul_single_ext $ λ j, begin
rw [set.ext_iff] at hflat,
have := (hflat (T₁.of_col (single j 0).to_matrix)).1 (of_col_mem_flat _ _),
simpa [of_col, hconst, hpartition, flat, matrix.mul_add, matrix.mul_assoc,
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (rowp_mul_rowp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (colp_mul_rowp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (colp_mul_colp_transpose _),
mul_right_eq_of_mul_eq (rowp_mul_colp_transpose _)] using
(hflat (T₁.of_col (single j 0).to_matrix)).1 (of_col_mem_flat _ _)
end,
by cases T₁; cases T₂; simp * at *
end predicate_lemmas
/-- Conditions for unboundedness based on reading the tableau. The conditions are equivalent to the
simplex pivot rule failing to find a pivot row. -/
lemma unbounded_of_tableau {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} {c : fin n} (hT : T.feasible)
(hrow : ∀ r, obj ≠ r → T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted →
0 ≤ T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r c)
(hc : (T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted)
∨ (0 < T.to_matrix obj c ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted)) :
T.is_unbounded_above (T.to_partition.rowg obj) :=
have hToc : T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hc,
(lt_or_gt_of_ne hToc).elim
(λ hToc : T.to_matrix obj c < 0, is_unbounded_above_rowg_of_nonpos hT c
(hc.elim and.right (λ h, (not_lt_of_gt hToc h.1).elim))
(λ i hi, classical.by_cases
(λ hoi : obj = i, le_of_lt (hoi ▸ hToc))
(λ hoi : obj ≠ i, inv_nonpos.1 $ nonpos_of_mul_nonneg_right (hrow _ hoi hi) hToc))
hToc)
(λ hToc : 0 < T.to_matrix obj c, is_unbounded_above_rowg_of_nonneg hT c
(λ i hi, classical.by_cases
(λ hoi : obj = i, le_of_lt (hoi ▸ hToc))
(λ hoi : obj ≠ i, inv_nonneg.1 $ nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left (hrow _ hoi hi) hToc))
hToc)
/-- Conditions for the tableau being feasible, that must be satisified by a simplex pivot rule -/
lemma feasible_pivot {T : tableau m n} (hT : T.feasible) {r c}
(hres : T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted)
(hpos : T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted → T.to_matrix r c < 0)
(hrmin : ∀ (i : fin m), T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted →
0 < T.to_matrix i c / T.to_matrix r c →
abs (T.const r 0 / T.to_matrix r c) ≤ abs (T.const i 0 / T.to_matrix i c)) :
(T.pivot r c).feasible :=
begin
assume i hi,
dsimp only [pivot],
by_cases hir : i = r,
{ subst i,
rw [if_pos rfl, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, neg_nonneg],
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (hT _ hres) (inv_nonpos.2 $ le_of_lt (by simp * at *)) },
{ rw if_neg hir,
rw [to_partition_pivot, rowg_swap_of_ne _ hir, restricted_pivot] at hi,
by_cases hTir : 0 < T.to_matrix i c / T.to_matrix r c,
{ have hTic0 : T.to_matrix i c ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hTir,
have hTrc0 : T.to_matrix r c ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hTir,
have := hrmin _ hi hTir,
rwa [abs_div, abs_div, abs_of_nonneg (hT _ hres), abs_of_nonneg (hT _ hi),
le_div_iff (abs_pos_iff.2 hTic0), div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm, ← abs_inv, mul_assoc,
← abs_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hTir), ← sub_nonneg,
← mul_div_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm (T.const r 0)] at this },
{ refine add_nonneg (hT _ hi) (neg_nonneg.2 _),
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm],
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (hT _ hres) (le_of_not_gt hTir) } }
end
lemma feasible_simplex_pivot {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} (hT : T.feasible) {r c}
(hres : T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted)
(hrneg : T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r c < 0)
(hrmin : ∀ (r' : fin m), obj ≠ r' → T.to_partition.rowg r' ∈ T.restricted →
T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r' c < 0 →
abs (T.const r 0 / T.to_matrix r c) ≤ abs (T.const r' 0 / T.to_matrix r' c))
(hc : T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted → 0 < T.to_matrix obj c) :
(T.pivot r c).feasible :=
feasible_pivot hT hres (λ hcres, inv_neg'.1 (neg_of_mul_neg_left hrneg (le_of_lt (hc hcres))))
(λ i hires hir,
have hobji : obj ≠ i,
from λ hobji, not_lt_of_gt hir (hobji ▸ hrneg),
(hrmin _ hobji hires $
have hTrc0 : T.to_matrix r c ≠ 0, from λ _, by simp [*, lt_irrefl] at *,
suffices (T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r c) / (T.to_matrix i c / T.to_matrix r c) < 0,
by rwa [div_div_div_cancel_right _ _ hTrc0] at this,
div_neg_of_neg_of_pos hrneg hir))
lemma simplex_const_obj_le {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} (hT : T.feasible) {r c}
(hres : T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted)
(hrneg : T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r c < 0) :
T.const obj 0 ≤ (T.pivot r c).const obj 0 :=
have obj ≠ r, from λ hor, begin
subst hor,
by_cases h0 : T.to_matrix obj c = 0,
{ simp [lt_irrefl, *] at * },
{ simp [div_self h0, not_lt_of_le zero_le_one, *] at * }
end,
by simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_nonneg, mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_left_comm (T.to_matrix obj c), const_pivot_of_ne _ this];
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (hT _ hres) (le_of_lt hrneg)
lemma const_eq_zero_of_const_obj_eq {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} (hT : T.feasible) {r c}
(hc : T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0) (hrc : T.to_matrix r c ≠ 0) (hobjr : obj ≠ r)
(hobj : (T.pivot r c).const obj 0 = T.const obj 0) :
T.const r 0 = 0 :=
by rw [const_pivot_of_ne _ hobjr, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add', sub_self,
eq_comm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero] at hobj;
tauto
namespace simplex
def pivot_linear_order (T : tableau m n) : decidable_linear_order (fin n) :=
decidable_linear_order.lift T.to_partition.colg (injective_colg _) (by apply_instance)
def find_pivot_column (T : tableau m n) (obj : fin m) : option (fin n) :=
option.cases_on
(fin.find (λ c : fin n, T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted))
(((list.fin_range n).filter (λ c : fin n, 0 < T.to_matrix obj c)).argmin
T.to_partition.colg)
some
def pivot_row_linear_order (T : tableau m n) (c : fin n) : decidable_linear_order (fin m) :=
decidable_linear_order.lift
(show fin m → lex ℚ (fin (m + n)),
from λ r', (abs (T.const r' 0 / T.to_matrix r' c), T.to_partition.rowg r'))
(λ x y, by simp [T.to_partition.injective_rowg.eq_iff])
(by apply_instance)
section
local attribute [instance, priority 0] fin.has_le fin.decidable_linear_order
lemma pivot_row_linear_order_le_def (T : tableau m n) (c : fin n) :
@has_le.le (fin m)
(by haveI := pivot_row_linear_order T c; apply_instance) =
(λ i i', abs (T.const i 0 / T.to_matrix i c) < abs (T.const i' 0 / T.to_matrix i' c) ∨
(abs (T.const i 0 / T.to_matrix i c) = abs (T.const i' 0 / T.to_matrix i' c) ∧
T.to_partition.rowg i ≤ T.to_partition.rowg i')) :=
funext $ λ i, funext $ λ i', propext $ prod.lex_def _ _
end
-- @[simp] lemma pivot_row_linear_order_le_def (T : tableau m n) (c : fin n) (i i' : fin m) :
-- pivot_row_le T c i i' ↔
-- abs (T.const i 0 / T.to_matrix i c) < abs (T.const i' 0 / T.to_matrix i' c) ∨
-- (abs (T.const i 0 / T.to_matrix i c) = abs (T.const i' 0 / T.to_matrix i' c) ∧
-- T.to_partition.rowg i ≤ T.to_partition.rowg i') :=
-- prod.lex_def _ _
def find_pivot_row (T : tableau m n) (obj: fin m) (c : fin n) : option (fin m) :=
let l := (list.fin_range m).filter (λ r : fin m, obj ≠ r ∧ T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted
∧ T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r c < 0) in
@list.minimum _ (pivot_row_linear_order T c) l
lemma find_pivot_column_spec {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} {c : fin n} :
c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj → (T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted)
∨ (0 < T.to_matrix obj c ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted) :=
begin
simp [find_pivot_column],
cases h : fin.find (λ c : fin n, T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted),
{ finish [h, fin.find_eq_some_iff, fin.find_eq_none_iff, lt_irrefl (0 : ℚ),
list.argmin_eq_some_iff] },
{ finish [fin.find_eq_some_iff] }
end
lemma nonpos_of_lt_find_pivot_column {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} {c j : fin n}
(hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) (hcres : T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted)
(hjc : T.to_partition.colg j < T.to_partition.colg c) :
T.to_matrix obj j ≤ 0 :=
begin
rw [find_pivot_column] at hc,
cases h : fin.find (λ c, T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 ∧ colg (T.to_partition) c ∉ T.restricted),
{ rw h at hc,
refine le_of_not_lt (λ hj0, _),
exact not_le_of_gt hjc ((list.mem_argmin_iff.1 hc).2.1 j (list.mem_filter.2 (by simp [hj0]))) },
{ rw h at hc,
simp [*, fin.find_eq_some_iff] at * }
end
lemma find_pivot_column_eq_none {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} (hT : T.feasible)
(h : find_pivot_column T obj = none) : T.is_optimal (T.of_col 0) (T.to_partition.rowg obj) :=
is_optimal_of_col_zero hT
begin
revert h,
simp [find_pivot_column],
cases h : fin.find (λ c : fin n, T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted),
{ finish [fin.find_eq_none_iff, list.argmin_eq_some_iff, list.filter_eq_nil] },
{ simp [h] }
end
lemma find_pivot_row_spec {T : tableau m n} {obj r : fin m} {c : fin n} :
r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c →
obj ≠ r ∧ T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted ∧
T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r c < 0 ∧
(∀ r' : fin m, obj ≠ r' → T.to_partition.rowg r' ∈ T.restricted →
T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r' c < 0 →
abs (T.const r 0 / T.to_matrix r c) ≤ abs (T.const r' 0 / T.to_matrix r' c)) :=
begin
simp only [list.mem_filter, find_pivot_row, option.mem_def, with_bot.some_eq_coe,
list.minimum_eq_coe_iff, list.mem_fin_range, true_and, and_imp],
rw [pivot_row_linear_order_le_def],
intros hor hres hr0 h,
simp only [*, true_and, ne.def, not_false_iff],
intros r' hor' hres' hr0',
cases h r' hor' hres' hr0',
{ exact le_of_lt (by assumption) },
{ exact le_of_eq (by tauto) }
end
lemma nonneg_of_lt_find_pivot_row {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} {r i : fin m} {c : fin n}
(hc0 : 0 < T.to_matrix obj c) (hres : T.to_partition.rowg i ∈ T.restricted)
(hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) (hr : r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c)
(hconst : T.const i 0 = 0)
(hjc : T.to_partition.rowg i < T.to_partition.rowg r) :
0 ≤ T.to_matrix i c :=
if hobj : obj = i then le_of_lt $ hobj ▸ hc0
else
le_of_not_gt $ λ hic, not_le_of_lt hjc
begin
have := ((@list.minimum_eq_coe_iff _ (id _) _ _).1 hr).2 i
(list.mem_filter.2 ⟨list.mem_fin_range _, hobj, hres, div_neg_of_pos_of_neg hc0 hic⟩),
rw [pivot_row_linear_order_le_def] at this,
simp [hconst, not_lt_of_ge (abs_nonneg _), *] at *
end
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_find_pivot_row {T : tableau m n} {obj r : fin m} {c : fin n}
(hr : r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c) : T.to_matrix r c ≠ 0 :=
assume hrc, by simpa [lt_irrefl, hrc] using find_pivot_row_spec hr
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_find_pivot_column {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} {c : fin n}
(hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) : T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 :=
λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using find_pivot_column_spec hc
lemma find_pivot_row_eq_none_aux {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} {c : fin n}
(hrow : find_pivot_row T obj c = none) (hs : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) :
∀ r, obj ≠ r → T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted → 0 ≤ T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r c :=
by simpa [find_pivot_row, list.filter_eq_nil] using hrow
lemma find_pivot_row_eq_none {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} {c : fin n} (hT : T.feasible)
(hrow : find_pivot_row T obj c = none) (hs : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) :
T.is_unbounded_above (T.to_partition.rowg obj) :=
have hrow : ∀ r, obj ≠ r → T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted →
0 ≤ T.to_matrix obj c / T.to_matrix r c,
from find_pivot_row_eq_none_aux hrow hs,
have hc : (T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∉ T.restricted)
∨ (0 < T.to_matrix obj c ∧ T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted),
from find_pivot_column_spec hs,
have hToc : T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hc,
(lt_or_gt_of_ne hToc).elim
(λ hToc : T.to_matrix obj c < 0, is_unbounded_above_rowg_of_nonpos hT c
(hc.elim and.right (λ h, (not_lt_of_gt hToc h.1).elim))
(λ i hi, classical.by_cases
(λ hoi : obj = i, le_of_lt (hoi ▸ hToc))
(λ hoi : obj ≠ i, inv_nonpos.1 $ nonpos_of_mul_nonneg_right (hrow _ hoi hi) hToc))
hToc)
(λ hToc : 0 < T.to_matrix obj c, is_unbounded_above_rowg_of_nonneg hT c
(λ i hi, classical.by_cases
(λ hoi : obj = i, le_of_lt (hoi ▸ hToc))
(λ hoi : obj ≠ i, inv_nonneg.1 $ nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left (hrow _ hoi hi) hToc))
hToc)
def feasible_of_mem_pivot_row_and_column {T : tableau m n} {obj : fin m} (hT : T.feasible) {c}
(hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) {r} (hr : r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c) :
feasible (T.pivot r c) :=
begin
have := find_pivot_column_spec hc,
have := find_pivot_row_spec hr,
have := @feasible_simplex_pivot _ _ _ obj hT r c,
tauto
end
section blands_rule
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.dec
variable (obj : fin m)
lemma not_unique_row_and_unique_col {T T' : tableau m n} {r c c'}
(hcobj0 : 0 < T.to_matrix obj c)
(hc'obj0 : 0 < T'.to_matrix obj c')
(hrc0 : T.to_matrix r c < 0)
(hflat : T.flat = T'.flat)
(hs : T.to_partition.rowg r = T'.to_partition.colg c')
(hrobj : T.to_partition.rowg obj = T'.to_partition.rowg obj)
(hfickle : ∀ i, T.to_partition.rowg i ≠ T'.to_partition.rowg i → T.const i 0 = 0)
(hobj : T.const obj 0 = T'.const obj 0)
(nonpos_of_colg_ne : ∀ j,
T'.to_partition.colg j ≠ T.to_partition.colg j → j ≠ c' → T'.to_matrix obj j ≤ 0)
(nonpos_of_colg_eq : ∀ j, j ≠ c' →
T'.to_partition.colg j = T.to_partition.colg c → T'.to_matrix obj j ≤ 0)
(unique_row : ∀ i ≠ r, T.const i 0 = 0 → T.to_partition.rowg i ≠ T'.to_partition.rowg i →
0 ≤ T.to_matrix i c) :
false :=
let objr := T.to_partition.rowg obj in
let x := λ y : ℚ, T.of_col (y • (single c 0).to_matrix) in
have hxflatT' : ∀ {y}, x y ∈ flat T', from hflat ▸ λ _, of_col_mem_flat _ _,
have hxrow : ∀ y i, x y (T.to_partition.rowg i) 0 = T.const i 0 + y * T.to_matrix i c,
by simp [x, of_col_single_rowg],
have hxcol : ∀ {y j}, j ≠ c → x y (T.to_partition.colg j) 0 = 0,
from λ y j hjc, by simp [x, of_col_colg, pequiv.to_matrix, single_apply_of_ne hjc.symm],
have hxcolc : ∀ {y}, x y (T.to_partition.colg c) 0 = y, by simp [x, of_col_colg, pequiv.to_matrix],
let c_star : fin (m + n) → ℚ := λ v, option.cases_on (T'.to_partition.colp.symm v) 0
(T'.to_matrix obj) in
have hxobj : ∀ y, x y objr 0 = T.const obj 0 + y * T.to_matrix obj c, from λ y, hxrow _ _,
have hgetr : ∀ {y v}, c_star v * x y v 0 ≠ 0 → (T'.to_partition.colp.symm v).is_some,
from λ y v, by cases h : T'.to_partition.colp.symm v; dsimp [c_star]; rw h; simp,
have c_star_eq_get : ∀ {v} (hv : (T'.to_partition.colp.symm v).is_some),
c_star v = T'.to_matrix obj (option.get hv),
from λ v hv, by dsimp only [c_star]; conv_lhs{rw [← option.some_get hv]}; refl,
have hsummmn : ∀ {y}, sum univ (λ j, T'.to_matrix obj j * x y (T'.to_partition.colg j) 0) =
sum univ (λ v, c_star v * x y v 0),
from λ y, sum_bij_ne_zero (λ j _ _, T'.to_partition.colg j) (λ _ _ _, mem_univ _)
(λ _ _ _ _ _ _ h, T'.to_partition.injective_colg h)
(λ v _ h0, ⟨option.get (hgetr h0), mem_univ _,
by rw [← c_star_eq_get (hgetr h0)]; simpa using h0, by simp⟩)
(λ _ _ h0, by dsimp [c_star]; rw [colp_colg]),
have hgetc : ∀ {y v}, c_star v * x y v 0 ≠ 0 → v ≠ T.to_partition.colg c →
(T.to_partition.rowp.symm v).is_some,
from λ y v, (eq_rowg_or_colg T.to_partition v).elim
(λ ⟨i, hi⟩, by rw [hi, rowp_rowg]; simp)
(λ ⟨j, hj⟩ h0 hvc,
by rw [hj, hxcol (mt (congr_arg T.to_partition.colg) (hvc ∘ hj.trans)), mul_zero] at h0;
exact (h0 rfl).elim),
have hsummmnn : ∀ {y}, (univ.erase (T.to_partition.colg c)).sum (λ v, c_star v * x y v 0) =
univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * x y (T.to_partition.rowg i) 0),
from λ y, eq.symm $ sum_bij_ne_zero (λ i _ _, T.to_partition.rowg i) (by simp)
(λ _ _ _ _ _ _ h, T.to_partition.injective_rowg h)
(λ v hvc h0, ⟨option.get (hgetc h0 (mem_erase.1 hvc).1), mem_univ _, by simpa using h0⟩)
(by intros; refl),
have hsumm : ∀ {y}, univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * x y (T.to_partition.rowg i) 0) =
univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.const i 0) +
y * univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i c),
from λ y, by simp only [hxrow, mul_add, add_mul, sum_add_distrib, mul_assoc,
mul_left_comm _ y, mul_sum.symm],
have hxobj' : ∀ y, x y objr 0 = univ.sum (λ v, c_star v * x y v 0) + T'.const obj 0,
from λ y, by dsimp [objr]; rw [hrobj, mem_flat_iff.1 hxflatT', hsummmn],
have hy : ∀ {y}, y * T.to_matrix obj c = c_star (T.to_partition.colg c) * y +
univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.const i 0) +
y * univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i c),
from λ y, by rw [← add_left_inj (T.const obj 0), ← hxobj, hxobj',
← insert_erase (mem_univ (T.to_partition.colg c)), sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
hsummmnn, hobj, hsumm, hxcolc]; simp,
have hy' : ∀ (y), y * (T.to_matrix obj c - c_star (T.to_partition.colg c) -
univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i c)) =
univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.const i 0),
from λ y, by rw [mul_sub, mul_sub, hy]; simp [mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm],
have h0 : T.to_matrix obj c - c_star (T.to_partition.colg c) -
univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i c) = 0,
by rw [← (domain.mul_left_inj (@one_ne_zero ℚ _)), hy', ← hy' 0, zero_mul, mul_zero],
have hcolnec' : T'.to_partition.colp.symm (T.to_partition.colg c) ≠ some c',
from λ h,
by simpa [hs.symm] using congr_arg T'.to_partition.colg (option.eq_some_iff_get_eq.1 h).snd,
have eq_of_roweqc' : ∀ {i}, T'.to_partition.colp.symm (T.to_partition.rowg i) = some c' → i = r,
from λ i h, by simpa [hs.symm, T.to_partition.injective_rowg.eq_iff] using
congr_arg T'.to_partition.colg (option.eq_some_iff_get_eq.1 h).snd,
have sumpos : 0 < univ.sum (λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i c),
by rw [← sub_eq_zero.1 h0]; exact add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hcobj0
(begin
simp only [c_star, neg_nonneg],
cases h : T'.to_partition.colp.symm (T.to_partition.colg c) with j,
{ refl },
{ exact nonpos_of_colg_eq j (mt (congr_arg some) (h ▸ hcolnec'))
(by rw [← (option.eq_some_iff_get_eq.1 h).snd]; simp) }
end),
have hexi : ∃ i, 0 < c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i c,
from imp_of_not_imp_not _ _ (by simpa using @sum_nonpos _ _ (@univ (fin m) _)
(λ i, c_star (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i c) _ _) sumpos,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hexi in
have hi0 : T.const i 0 = 0, from hfickle i
(λ h, by dsimp [c_star] at hi; rw [h, colp_rowg_eq_none] at hi; simpa [lt_irrefl] using hi),
have hi_some : (T'.to_partition.colp.symm (T.to_partition.rowg i)).is_some,
from option.ne_none_iff_is_some.1 (λ h, by dsimp only [c_star] at hi; rw h at hi;
simpa [lt_irrefl] using hi),
have hi' : 0 < T'.to_matrix obj (option.get hi_some) * T.to_matrix i c,
by dsimp only [c_star] at hi; rwa [← option.some_get hi_some] at hi,
have hir : i ≠ r, from λ hir, begin
have : option.get hi_some = c', from T'.to_partition.injective_colg
(by rw [colg_get_colp_symm, ← hs, hir]),
rw [this, hir] at hi',
exact not_lt_of_gt hi' (mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg hc'obj0 hrc0)
end,
have hnec' : option.get hi_some ≠ c',
from λ eq_c', hir $ @eq_of_roweqc' i (eq_c' ▸ by simp),
have hic0 : T.to_matrix i c < 0,
from neg_of_mul_pos_right hi' (nonpos_of_colg_ne _ (by simp) hnec'),
not_le_of_gt hic0 (unique_row _ hir hi0
(by rw [← colg_get_colp_symm _ _ hi_some]; exact colg_ne_rowg _ _ _))
inductive rel : tableau m n → tableau m n → Prop
| pivot : ∀ {T}, feasible T → ∀ {r c}, c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj →
r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c → rel (T.pivot r c) T
| trans_pivot : ∀ {T₁ T₂ r c}, rel T₁ T₂ → c ∈ find_pivot_column T₁ obj →
r ∈ find_pivot_row T₁ obj c → rel (T₁.pivot r c) T₂
lemma feasible_of_rel_right {T T' : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T' T) : T.feasible :=
rel.rec_on h (by tauto) (by tauto)
lemma feasible_of_rel_left {T T' : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T' T) : T'.feasible :=
rel.rec_on h (λ _ hT _ _ hc hr, feasible_of_mem_pivot_row_and_column hT hc hr)
(λ _ _ _ _ _ hc hr hT, feasible_of_mem_pivot_row_and_column hT hc hr)
/-- Slightly stronger recursor than the default recursor -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma rel.rec_on' {obj : fin m} {C : tableau m n → tableau m n → Prop} {T T' : tableau m n}
(hrel : rel obj T T')
(hpivot : ∀ {T : tableau m n} {r : fin m} {c : fin n},
feasible T → c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj → r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c → C (pivot T r c) T)
(hpivot_trans : ∀ {T₁ T₂ : tableau m n} {r : fin m} {c : fin n},
rel obj (T₁.pivot r c) T₁ → rel obj T₁ T₂ →
c ∈ find_pivot_column T₁ obj →
r ∈ find_pivot_row T₁ obj c → C (T₁.pivot r c) T₁ → C T₁ T₂ → C (pivot T₁ r c) T₂) :
C T T' :=
rel.rec_on hrel (λ T hT r c hc hr, hpivot hT hc hr) (λ T₁ T₂ r c hrelT₁₂ hc hr ih, hpivot_trans
(rel.pivot (feasible_of_rel_left obj hrelT₁₂) hc hr) hrelT₁₂ hc hr
(hpivot (feasible_of_rel_left obj hrelT₁₂) hc hr) ih)
lemma rel.trans {obj : fin m} {T₁ T₂ T₃ : tableau m n} (h₁₂ : rel obj T₁ T₂) :
rel obj T₂ T₃ → rel obj T₁ T₃ :=
rel.rec_on h₁₂
(λ T r c hT hc hr hrelT, rel.trans_pivot hrelT hc hr)
(λ T₁ T₂ r c hrelT₁₂ hc hr ih hrelT₂₃, rel.trans_pivot (ih hrelT₂₃) hc hr)
instance : is_trans (tableau m n) (rel obj) := ⟨@rel.trans _ _ obj⟩
lemma flat_eq_of_rel {T T' : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T' T) : flat T' = flat T :=
rel.rec_on' h (λ _ _ _ _ _ hr, flat_pivot (ne_zero_of_mem_find_pivot_row hr))
(λ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, eq.trans)
lemma rowg_obj_eq_of_rel {T T' : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T T') : T.to_partition.rowg obj =
T'.to_partition.rowg obj :=
rel.rec_on' h (λ T r c hfT hc hr, by simp [rowg_swap_of_ne _ (find_pivot_row_spec hr).1])
(λ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, eq.trans)
lemma restricted_eq_of_rel {T T' : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T T') : T.restricted = T'.restricted :=
rel.rec_on' h (λ _ _ _ _ _ _, rfl) (λ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, eq.trans)
lemma exists_mem_pivot_row_column_of_rel {T T' : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T' T) :
∃ r c, c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj ∧ r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c :=
rel.rec_on' h (λ _ r c _ hc hr, ⟨r, c, hc, hr⟩) (λ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, id)
lemma exists_mem_pivot_row_of_rel {T T' : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T' T) {c : fin n}
(hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) : ∃ r, r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c :=
let ⟨r, c', hc', hr⟩ := exists_mem_pivot_row_column_of_rel obj h in ⟨r, by simp * at *⟩
lemma colg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_column {T₁ T₂ : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T₂ T₁) {c : fin n} :
T₁.to_partition.colg c = T₂.to_partition.colg c ∨
∃ T₃, (T₃ = T₁ ∨ rel obj T₃ T₁) ∧ (rel obj T₂ T₃) ∧
T₃.to_partition.colg c = T₁.to_partition.colg c ∧
c ∈ find_pivot_column T₃ obj :=
rel.rec_on' h begin
assume T r c' hT hc' hr,
by_cases hcc : c = c',
{ subst hcc,
exact or.inr ⟨T, or.inl rfl, rel.pivot hT hc' hr, rfl, hc'⟩ },
{ simp [colg_swap_of_ne _ hcc] }
end
(λ T₁ T₂ r c hrelp₁ hrel₁₂ hc hr ihp₁ ih₁₂,
ih₁₂.elim
(λ ih₁₂, ihp₁.elim
(λ ihp₁, or.inl (ih₁₂.trans ihp₁))
(λ ⟨T₃, hT₃⟩, or.inr ⟨T₃,
hT₃.1.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ or.inr hrel₁₂) (λ h, or.inr $ h.trans hrel₁₂),
hT₃.2.1, hT₃.2.2.1.trans ih₁₂.symm, hT₃.2.2.2⟩))
(λ ⟨T₃, hT₃⟩, or.inr ⟨T₃, hT₃.1, hrelp₁.trans hT₃.2.1, hT₃.2.2⟩))
lemma rowg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_row {T₁ T₂ : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T₂ T₁) (r : fin m) :
T₁.to_partition.rowg r = T₂.to_partition.rowg r ∨
∃ (T₃ : tableau m n) c, (T₃ = T₁ ∨ rel obj T₃ T₁) ∧ (rel obj T₂ T₃) ∧
T₃.to_partition.rowg r = T₁.to_partition.rowg r ∧
c ∈ find_pivot_column T₃ obj ∧ r ∈ find_pivot_row T₃ obj c :=
rel.rec_on' h
begin
assume T r' c hT hc hr',
by_cases hrr : r = r',
{ subst hrr,
exact or.inr ⟨T, c, or.inl rfl, rel.pivot hT hc hr', rfl, hc, hr'⟩ },
{ simp [rowg_swap_of_ne _ hrr] }
end
(λ T₁ T₂ r c hrelp₁ hrel₁₂ hc hr ihp₁ ih₁₂,
ih₁₂.elim
(λ ih₁₂, ihp₁.elim
(λ ihp₁, or.inl $ ih₁₂.trans ihp₁)
(λ ⟨T₃, c', hT₃⟩, or.inr ⟨T₃, c', hT₃.1.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ or.inr hrel₁₂)
(λ h, or.inr $ h.trans hrel₁₂), hT₃.2.1, ih₁₂.symm ▸ hT₃.2.2.1, hT₃.2.2.2⟩))
(λ ⟨T₃, c', hT₃⟩, or.inr ⟨T₃, c', hT₃.1,
(rel.pivot (feasible_of_rel_left _ hrel₁₂) hc hr).trans hT₃.2.1, hT₃.2.2⟩))
lemma eq_or_rel_pivot_of_rel {T₁ T₂ : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T₁ T₂) : ∀ {r c}
(hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T₂ obj) (hr : r ∈ find_pivot_row T₂ obj c),
T₁ = T₂.pivot r c ∨ rel obj T₁ (T₂.pivot r c) :=
rel.rec_on' h (λ T r c hT hc hr r' c' hc' hr', by simp * at *)
(λ T₁ T₂ r c hrelp₁ hrel₁₂ hc hr ihp₁ ih₁₂ r' c' hc' hr',
(ih₁₂ hc' hr').elim
(λ ih₁₂, or.inr $ ih₁₂ ▸ rel.pivot (feasible_of_rel_left _ hrel₁₂) hc hr)
(λ ih₁₂, or.inr $ (rel.pivot (feasible_of_rel_left _ hrel₁₂) hc hr).trans ih₁₂))
lemma exists_mem_pivot_column_of_mem_pivot_row {T : tableau m n} (hrelTT : rel obj T T)
{r c} (hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) (hr : r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c) :
∃ (T' : tableau m n), c ∈ find_pivot_column T' obj ∧ T'.to_partition.colg c =
T.to_partition.rowg r ∧ rel obj T' T ∧ rel obj T T' :=
have hrelTTp : rel obj T (T.pivot r c),
from (eq_or_rel_pivot_of_rel _ hrelTT hc hr).elim (λ h, h ▸ hrelTT ) id,
let ⟨T', hT'⟩ := (colg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_column obj hrelTTp).resolve_left
(show (T.pivot r c).to_partition.colg c ≠ T.to_partition.colg c, by simp) in
⟨T', hT'.2.2.2, by simp [hT'.2.2.1], hT'.1.elim
(λ h, h.symm ▸ rel.pivot (feasible_of_rel_left _ hrelTT) hc hr)
(λ h, h.trans $ rel.pivot (feasible_of_rel_left _ hrelTT) hc hr), hT'.2.1⟩
lemma exists_mem_pivot_column_of_rowg_ne {T T' : tableau m n} (hrelTT' : rel obj T T') {r : fin m}
(hrelT'T : rel obj T' T) (hrow : T.to_partition.rowg r ≠ T'.to_partition.rowg r) :
∃ (T₃ : tableau m n) c, c ∈ find_pivot_column T₃ obj ∧ T₃.to_partition.colg c =
T.to_partition.rowg r ∧ rel obj T₃ T ∧ rel obj T T₃ :=
let ⟨T₃, c, hT₃, hrelT₃T, hrow₃, hc, hr⟩ :=
(rowg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_row obj hrelT'T _).resolve_left hrow in
let ⟨T₄, hT₄⟩ := exists_mem_pivot_column_of_mem_pivot_row obj
(show rel obj T₃ T₃, from hT₃.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hrelTT'.trans hrelT'T)
(λ h, h.trans $ hrelTT'.trans hrelT₃T)) hc hr in
⟨T₄, c, hT₄.1, hT₄.2.1.trans hrow₃, hT₄.2.2.1.trans $ hT₃.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hrelTT'.trans hrelT'T)
(λ h, h.trans $ hrelTT'.trans hrelT'T), hrelTT'.trans (hrelT₃T.trans hT₄.2.2.2)⟩
lemma const_obj_le_of_rel {T₁ T₂ : tableau m n} (h : rel obj T₁ T₂) :
T₂.const obj 0 ≤ T₁.const obj 0 :=
rel.rec_on' h (λ T r c hT hc hr,
have hr' : _ := find_pivot_row_spec hr,
simplex_const_obj_le hT (by tauto) (by tauto))
(λ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂, le_trans h₂ h₁)
lemma const_obj_eq_of_rel_of_rel {T₁ T₂ : tableau m n} (h₁₂ : rel obj T₁ T₂)
(h₂₁ : rel obj T₂ T₁) : T₁.const obj 0 = T₂.const obj 0 :=
le_antisymm (const_obj_le_of_rel _ h₂₁) (const_obj_le_of_rel _ h₁₂)
lemma const_eq_const_of_const_obj_eq {T₁ T₂ : tableau m n} (h₁₂ : rel obj T₁ T₂) :
∀ (hobj : T₁.const obj 0 = T₂.const obj 0) (i : fin m), T₁.const i 0 = T₂.const i 0 :=
rel.rec_on' h₁₂
(λ T r c hfT hc hr hobj i,
have hr0 : T.const r 0 = 0, from const_eq_zero_of_const_obj_eq hfT
(ne_zero_of_mem_find_pivot_column hc) (ne_zero_of_mem_find_pivot_row hr)
(find_pivot_row_spec hr).1 hobj,
if hir : i = r
then by simp [hir, hr0]
else by simp [const_pivot_of_ne _ hir, hr0])
(λ T₁ T₂ r c hrelp₁ hrel₁₂ hc hr ihp₁ ih₁₂ hobj i,
have hobjp : (pivot T₁ r c).const obj 0 = T₁.const obj 0,
from le_antisymm (hobj.symm ▸ const_obj_le_of_rel _ hrel₁₂)
(const_obj_le_of_rel _ hrelp₁),
by rw [ihp₁ hobjp, ih₁₂ (hobjp.symm.trans hobj)])
lemma const_eq_zero_of_rowg_ne_of_rel_self {T T' : tableau m n} (hrelTT' : rel obj T T')
(hrelT'T : rel obj T' T) (i : fin m) (hrow : T.to_partition.rowg i ≠ T'.to_partition.rowg i) :
T.const i 0 = 0 :=
let ⟨T₃, c, hT₃₁, hT'₃, hrow₃, hc, hi⟩ := (rowg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_row obj hrelT'T _).resolve_left hrow in
have T₃.const i 0 = 0, from const_eq_zero_of_const_obj_eq
(feasible_of_rel_right _ hT'₃) (ne_zero_of_mem_find_pivot_column hc)
(ne_zero_of_mem_find_pivot_row hi) (find_pivot_row_spec hi).1
(const_obj_eq_of_rel_of_rel _ (rel.pivot (feasible_of_rel_right _ hT'₃) hc hi)
((eq_or_rel_pivot_of_rel _ hT'₃ hc hi).elim
(λ h, h ▸ hT₃₁.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hrelTT') (λ h, h.trans hrelTT'))
(λ hrelT'p, hT₃₁.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hrelTT'.trans (h ▸ hrelT'p))
(λ h, h.trans $ hrelTT'.trans hrelT'p)))),
have hobj : T₃.const obj 0 = T.const obj 0,
from hT₃₁.elim (λ h, h ▸ rfl) (λ h, const_obj_eq_of_rel_of_rel _ h (hrelTT'.trans hT'₃)),
hT₃₁.elim (λ h, h ▸ this) (λ h, const_eq_const_of_const_obj_eq obj h hobj i ▸ this)
lemma colg_mem_restricted_of_rel_self {T : tableau m n} (hrelTT : rel obj T T)
{c} (hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) : T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_mem_pivot_row_of_rel obj hrelTT hc in
let ⟨T', c', hT', hrelTT', hrowcol, _, hr'⟩ := (rowg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_row obj
((eq_or_rel_pivot_of_rel _ hrelTT hc hr).elim
(λ h, show rel obj T (T.pivot r c), from h ▸ hrelTT) id) _).resolve_left
(show (T.pivot r c).to_partition.rowg r ≠ T.to_partition.rowg r, by simp) in
(restricted_eq_of_rel _ hrelTT').symm ▸ by convert (find_pivot_row_spec hr').2.1; simp [hrowcol]
lemma eq_zero_of_not_mem_restricted_of_rel_self {T : tableau m n} (hrelTT : rel obj T T)
{j} (hjres : T.to_partition.colg j ∉ T.restricted) : T.to_matrix obj j = 0 :=
let ⟨r, c, hc, hr⟩ := exists_mem_pivot_row_column_of_rel obj hrelTT in
have hcres : T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted,
from colg_mem_restricted_of_rel_self obj hrelTT hc,
by_contradiction $ λ h0,
begin
simp [find_pivot_column] at hc,
cases h : fin.find (λ c, T.to_matrix obj c ≠ 0 ∧ colg (T.to_partition) c ∉ T.restricted),
{ simp [*, fin.find_eq_none_iff] at * },
{ rw h at hc, clear_aux_decl,
have := (fin.find_eq_some_iff.1 h).1,
simp * at * }
end
lemma rel.irrefl {obj : fin m} : ∀ (T : tableau m n), ¬ rel obj T T :=
λ T1 hrelT1,
let ⟨rT1 , cT1, hrT1, hcT1⟩ := exists_mem_pivot_row_column_of_rel obj hrelT1 in
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := finset.max_of_mem
(show T1.to_partition.colg cT1 ∈ univ.filter (λ v, ∃ (T' : tableau m n) (c : fin n),
rel obj T' T' ∧ c ∈ find_pivot_column T' obj ∧ T'.to_partition.colg c = v),
by simp only [true_and, mem_filter, mem_univ, exists_and_distrib_left];
exact ⟨T1, hrelT1, cT1, hrT1, rfl⟩) in
let ⟨_, T', c', hrelTT'', hcT', hct⟩ := finset.mem_filter.1 (finset.mem_of_max ht) in
have htmax : ∀ (s : fin (m + n)) (T : tableau m n),
rel obj T T → ∀ (j : fin n), find_pivot_column T obj = some j →
T.to_partition.colg j = s → s ≤ t,
by simpa using λ s (h : s ∈ _), finset.le_max_of_mem h ht,
let ⟨r, hrT'⟩ := exists_mem_pivot_row_of_rel obj hrelTT'' hcT' in
have hrelTT''p : rel obj T' (T'.pivot r c'),
from (eq_or_rel_pivot_of_rel obj hrelTT'' hcT' hrT').elim (λ h, h ▸ hrelTT'') id,
let ⟨T, c, hTT', hrelT'T, hT'Tr, hc, hr⟩ := (rowg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_row obj
hrelTT''p r).resolve_left (by simp) in
have hfT' : feasible T', from feasible_of_rel_left _ hrelTT'',
have hfT : feasible T, from feasible_of_rel_right _ hrelT'T,
have hrelT'pT' : rel obj (T'.pivot r c') T', from rel.pivot hfT' hcT' hrT',
have hrelTT' : rel obj T T', from hTT'.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hrelT'pT') (λ h, h.trans hrelT'pT'),
have hrelTT : rel obj T T, from hrelTT'.trans hrelT'T,
have hc't : T.to_partition.colg c ≤ t, from htmax _ T hrelTT _ hc rfl,
have hoT'T : T'.const obj 0 = T.const obj 0, from const_obj_eq_of_rel_of_rel _ hrelT'T hrelTT',
have hfickle : ∀ i, T.to_partition.rowg i ≠ T'.to_partition.rowg i → T.const i 0 = 0,
from const_eq_zero_of_rowg_ne_of_rel_self obj hrelTT' hrelT'T,
have hobj : T.const obj 0 = T'.const obj 0, from const_obj_eq_of_rel_of_rel _ hrelTT' hrelT'T,
have hflat : T.flat = T'.flat, from flat_eq_of_rel obj hrelTT',
have hrobj : T.to_partition.rowg obj = T'.to_partition.rowg obj, from rowg_obj_eq_of_rel _ hrelTT',
have hs : T.to_partition.rowg r = T'.to_partition.colg c', by simpa using hT'Tr,
have hc'res : T'.to_partition.colg c' ∈ T'.restricted,
from hs ▸ restricted_eq_of_rel _ hrelTT' ▸ (find_pivot_row_spec hr).2.1,
have hc'obj0 : 0 < T'.to_matrix obj c', by simpa [hc'res] using find_pivot_column_spec hcT',
have hcres : T.to_partition.colg c ∈ T.restricted,
from colg_mem_restricted_of_rel_self obj hrelTT hc,
have hcobj0 : 0 < to_matrix T obj c, by simpa [hcres] using find_pivot_column_spec hc,
have hrc0 : T.to_matrix r c < 0,
from inv_neg'.1 $ neg_of_mul_neg_left (find_pivot_row_spec hr).2.2.1 (le_of_lt hcobj0),
have nonpos_of_colg_ne : ∀ j, T'.to_partition.colg j ≠ T.to_partition.colg j → j ≠ c' →
T'.to_matrix obj j ≤ 0,
from λ j hj hjc',
let ⟨T₃, hT₃⟩ := (colg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_column obj hrelTT').resolve_left hj in
nonpos_of_lt_find_pivot_column hcT' hc'res
(lt_of_le_of_ne
(hct.symm ▸ hT₃.2.2.1 ▸ htmax _ T₃ (hT₃.1.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hrelTT'')
(λ h, h.trans (hrelT'T.trans hT₃.2.1))) _ hT₃.2.2.2 rfl)
(by rwa [ne.def, T'.to_partition.injective_colg.eq_iff])),
have nonpos_of_colg_eq : ∀ j, j ≠ c' →
T'.to_partition.colg j = T.to_partition.colg c → T'.to_matrix obj j ≤ 0,
from λ j hjc' hj,
if hjc : j = c
then by clear_aux_decl; subst j; exact nonpos_of_lt_find_pivot_column hcT' hc'res
(lt_of_le_of_ne
(hj.symm ▸ hct.symm ▸ htmax _ _ hrelTT _ hc rfl)
(hs ▸ hj.symm ▸ colg_ne_rowg _ _ _))
else let ⟨T₃, hT₃⟩ := (colg_eq_or_exists_mem_pivot_column obj hrelTT').resolve_left
(show T'.to_partition.colg j ≠ T.to_partition.colg j,
by simpa [hj, T.to_partition.injective_colg.eq_iff, eq_comm] using hjc) in
nonpos_of_lt_find_pivot_column hcT' hc'res
(lt_of_le_of_ne
(hct.symm ▸ hT₃.2.2.1 ▸ htmax _ T₃ (hT₃.1.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hrelTT'')
(λ h, h.trans (hrelT'T.trans hT₃.2.1))) _ hT₃.2.2.2 rfl)
(by rwa [ne.def, T'.to_partition.injective_colg.eq_iff])),
have unique_row : ∀ i ≠ r, T.const i 0 = 0 → T.to_partition.rowg i ≠ T'.to_partition.rowg i →
0 ≤ T.to_matrix i c,
from λ i hir hi0 hrow,
let ⟨T₃, c₃, hc₃, hrow₃, hrelT₃T, hrelTT₃⟩ :=
exists_mem_pivot_column_of_rowg_ne _ hrelTT' hrelT'T hrow in
have hrelT₃T₃ : rel obj T₃ T₃, from hrelT₃T.trans hrelTT₃,
nonneg_of_lt_find_pivot_row (by exact hcobj0)
(by rw [← hrow₃, ← restricted_eq_of_rel _ hrelT₃T];
exact colg_mem_restricted_of_rel_self _ hrelT₃T₃ hc₃) hc hr hi0
(lt_of_le_of_ne (by rw [hs, hct, ← hrow₃]; exact htmax _ _ hrelT₃T₃ _ hc₃ rfl)
(by simpa [T.to_partition.injective_rowg.eq_iff])),
not_unique_row_and_unique_col obj hcobj0 hc'obj0 hrc0 hflat hs hrobj hfickle hobj
nonpos_of_colg_ne nonpos_of_colg_eq unique_row
noncomputable instance fintype_rel (T : tableau m n) : fintype {T' | rel obj T' T} :=
fintype.of_injective (λ T', T'.val.to_partition)
(λ T₁ T₂ h, subtype.eq $ tableau.ext
(by rw [flat_eq_of_rel _ T₁.2, flat_eq_of_rel _ T₂.2]) h
(by rw [restricted_eq_of_rel _ T₁.2, restricted_eq_of_rel _ T₂.2]))
lemma rel_wf (m n : ℕ) (obj : fin m): well_founded (@rel m n obj) :=
subrelation.wf
(show subrelation (@rel m n obj) (measure (λ T, fintype.card {T' | rel obj T' T})),
from assume T₁ T₂ h,
set.card_lt_card (set.ssubset_iff_subset_not_subset.2 ⟨λ T' hT', hT'.trans h,
classical.not_forall.2 ⟨T₁, λ h', rel.irrefl _ (h' h)⟩⟩))
(measure_wf (λ T, fintype.card {T' | rel obj T' T}))
end blands_rule
@[derive _root_.decidable_eq] inductive termination : Type
| while : termination
| unbounded : termination
| optimal : termination
open termination
instance : has_repr termination := ⟨λ t, termination.cases_on t "while" "unbounded" "optimal"⟩
instance : fintype termination := ⟨⟨quotient.mk [while, unbounded, optimal], dec_trivial⟩,
λ x, by cases x; exact dec_trivial⟩
end simplex
open simplex simplex.termination
/-- The simplex algorithm -/
def simplex (w : tableau m n → bool) (obj : fin m) : Π (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T) ,
tableau m n × termination
| T := λ hT, cond (w T)
(match find_pivot_column T obj, @feasible_of_mem_pivot_row_and_column _ _ _ obj hT,
@rel.pivot m n obj _ hT with
| none, hc, hrel := (T, optimal)
| some c, hc, hrel :=
match find_pivot_row T obj c, @hc _ rfl, (λ r, @hrel r c rfl) with
| none, hr, hrel := (T, unbounded)
| some r, hr, hrel := have wf : rel obj (pivot T r c) T, from hrel _ rfl,
simplex (T.pivot r c) (hr rfl)
end
end)
(T, while)
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, rel_wf m n obj⟩],
dec_tac := tactic.assumption}
namespace simplex
lemma simplex_pivot {w : tableau m n → bool} {T : tableau m n} (hT : feasible T)
(hw : w T = tt) {obj : fin m} {r : fin m} {c : fin n}
(hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj) (hr : r ∈ find_pivot_row T obj c) :
(T.pivot r c).simplex w obj (feasible_of_mem_pivot_row_and_column hT hc hr) =
T.simplex w obj hT :=
by conv_rhs { rw simplex };
simp [hw, show _ = _, from hr, show _ = _, from hc, _match_1, _match_2]
lemma simplex_spec_aux (w : tableau m n → bool) (obj : fin m) :
Π (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T),
((T.simplex w obj hT).2 = while ∧ w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = ff) ∨
((T.simplex w obj hT).2 = optimal ∧ w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = tt ∧
find_pivot_column (T.simplex w obj hT).1 obj = none) ∨
((T.simplex w obj hT).2 = unbounded ∧ w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = tt ∧
∃ c, c ∈ find_pivot_column (T.simplex w obj hT).1 obj ∧
find_pivot_row (T.simplex w obj hT).1 obj c = none)
| T := λ hT,
begin
cases hw : w T,
{ rw simplex, simp [hw] },
{ cases hc : find_pivot_column T obj with c,
{ rw simplex, simp [hc, hw, _match_1] },
{ cases hr : find_pivot_row T obj c with r,
{ rw simplex, simp [hr, hc, hw, _match_1, _match_2] },
{ rw [← simplex_pivot hT hw hc hr],
exact have wf : rel obj (T.pivot r c) T, from rel.pivot hT hc hr,
simplex_spec_aux _ _ } } }
end
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, rel_wf m n obj⟩],
dec_tac := `[tauto]}
lemma simplex_while_eq_ff {w : tableau m n → bool} {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T}
{obj : fin m} (hw : w T = ff) : T.simplex w obj hT = (T, while) :=
by rw [simplex, hw]; refl
lemma simplex_find_pivot_column_eq_none {w : tableau m n → bool} {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T}
(hw : w T = tt) {obj : fin m} (hc : find_pivot_column T obj = none) :
T.simplex w obj hT = (T, optimal) :=
by rw simplex; simp [hc, hw, _match_1]
lemma simplex_find_pivot_row_eq_none {w : tableau m n → bool} {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T}
{obj : fin m} (hw : w T = tt) {c} (hc : c ∈ find_pivot_column T obj)
(hr : find_pivot_row T obj c = none) : T.simplex w obj hT = (T, unbounded) :=
by rw simplex; simp [hw, show _ = _, from hc, hr, _match_1, _match_2]
lemma simplex_induction (P : tableau m n → Prop) (w : tableau m n → bool) (obj : fin m):
Π {T : tableau m n} (hT : feasible T) (h0 : P T)
(hpivot : ∀ {T' r c}, w T' = tt → c ∈ find_pivot_column T' obj → r ∈ find_pivot_row T' obj c
→ feasible T' → P T' → P (T'.pivot r c)),
P (T.simplex w obj hT).1
| T := λ hT h0 hpivot,
begin
cases hw : w T,
{ rwa [simplex_while_eq_ff hw] },
{ cases hc : find_pivot_column T obj with c,
{ rwa [simplex_find_pivot_column_eq_none hw hc] },
{ cases hr : find_pivot_row T obj c with r,
{ rwa simplex_find_pivot_row_eq_none hw hc hr },
{ rw [← simplex_pivot _ hw hc hr],
exact have wf : rel obj (pivot T r c) T, from rel.pivot hT hc hr,
simplex_induction (feasible_of_mem_pivot_row_and_column hT hc hr)
(hpivot hw hc hr hT h0) @hpivot } } }
end
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, rel_wf m n obj⟩],
dec_tac := `[tauto]}
@[simp] lemma feasible_simplex {w : tableau m n → bool} {T : tableau m n}
{hT : feasible T} {obj : fin m} : feasible (T.simplex w obj hT).1 :=
simplex_induction feasible _ _ hT hT
(λ _ _ _ _ hc hr _ hT', feasible_of_mem_pivot_row_and_column hT' hc hr)
@[simp] lemma simplex_simplex {w : tableau m n → bool} {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T}
{obj : fin m} : (T.simplex w obj hT).1.simplex w obj feasible_simplex = T.simplex w obj hT :=
simplex_induction (λ T', ∀ (hT' : feasible T'), T'.simplex w obj hT' = T.simplex w obj hT) w _ _
(λ _, rfl) (λ T' r c hw hc hr hT' ih hpivot, by rw [simplex_pivot hT' hw hc hr, ih]) _
/-- `simplex` does not move the row variable it is trying to maximise. -/
@[simp] lemma rowg_simplex (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T) (w : tableau m n → bool)
(obj : fin m) : (T.simplex w obj hT).1.to_partition.rowg obj = T.to_partition.rowg obj :=
simplex_induction (λ T', T'.to_partition.rowg obj = T.to_partition.rowg obj) _ _ _ rfl
(λ T' r c hw hc hr, by simp [rowg_swap_of_ne _ (find_pivot_row_spec hr).1])
@[simp] lemma flat_simplex (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T) (w : tableau m n → bool)
(obj : fin m) : (T.simplex w obj hT).1.flat = T.flat :=
simplex_induction (λ T', T'.flat = T.flat) w obj _ rfl
(λ T' r c hw hc hr hT' ih,
have T'.to_matrix r c ≠ 0,
from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using find_pivot_row_spec hr,
by rw [flat_pivot this, ih])
@[simp] lemma restricted_simplex (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T) (w : tableau m n → bool)
(obj : fin m) : (T.simplex w obj hT).1.restricted = T.restricted :=
simplex_induction (λ T', T'.restricted = T.restricted) _ _ _ rfl (by simp { contextual := tt })
@[simp] lemma sol_set_simplex (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T) (w : tableau m n → bool)
(obj : fin m) : (T.simplex w obj hT).1.sol_set = T.sol_set :=
by simp [sol_set]
@[simp] lemma of_col_simplex_zero_mem_sol_set {w : tableau m n → bool} {T : tableau m n}
{hT : feasible T} {obj : fin m} : (T.simplex w obj hT).1.of_col 0 ∈ sol_set T :=
by rw [← sol_set_simplex, of_col_zero_mem_sol_set_iff]; exact feasible_simplex
@[simp] lemma of_col_simplex_rowg {w : tableau m n → bool} {T : tableau m n}
{hT : feasible T} {obj : fin m} (x : cvec n) :
(T.simplex w obj hT).1.of_col x (T.to_partition.rowg obj) =
((T.simplex w obj hT).1.to_matrix ⬝ x + (T.simplex w obj hT).1.const) obj :=
by rw [← of_col_rowg (T.simplex w obj hT).1 x obj, rowg_simplex]
@[simp] lemma is_unbounded_above_simplex {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T} {w : tableau m n → bool}
{obj : fin m} {v : fin (m + n)} : is_unbounded_above (T.simplex w obj hT).1 v ↔
is_unbounded_above T v := by simp [is_unbounded_above]
@[simp] lemma is_optimal_simplex {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T} {w : tableau m n → bool}
{obj : fin m} {x : cvec (m + n)} {v : fin (m + n)} : is_optimal (T.simplex w obj hT).1 x v ↔
is_optimal T x v := by simp [is_optimal]
lemma termination_eq_while_iff {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T} {w : tableau m n → bool}
{obj : fin m} : (T.simplex w obj hT).2 = while ↔ w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = ff :=
by have := simplex_spec_aux w obj T hT; finish
lemma termination_eq_optimal_iff_find_pivot_column_eq_none {T : tableau m n}
{hT : feasible T} {w : tableau m n → bool} {obj : fin m} : (T.simplex w obj hT).2 = optimal ↔
w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = tt ∧ find_pivot_column (T.simplex w obj hT).1 obj = none :=
by have := simplex_spec_aux w obj T hT; finish
lemma termination_eq_unbounded_iff_find_pivot_row_eq_none {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T}
{w : tableau m n → bool} {obj : fin m} : (T.simplex w obj hT).2 = unbounded ↔
w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = tt ∧ ∃ c, c ∈ find_pivot_column (T.simplex w obj hT).1 obj ∧
find_pivot_row (T.simplex w obj hT).1 obj c = none :=
by have := simplex_spec_aux w obj T hT; finish
lemma termination_eq_unbounded_iff_aux {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T}
{w : tableau m n → bool} {obj : fin m} : (T.simplex w obj hT).2 = unbounded →
w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = tt ∧
is_unbounded_above T (T.to_partition.rowg obj) :=
begin
rw termination_eq_unbounded_iff_find_pivot_row_eq_none,
rintros ⟨_, c, hc⟩,
simpa * using find_pivot_row_eq_none feasible_simplex hc.2 hc.1
end
lemma termination_eq_optimal_iff {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T}
{w : tableau m n → bool} {obj : fin m} : (T.simplex w obj hT).2 = optimal ↔
w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = tt ∧
is_optimal T ((T.simplex w obj hT).1.of_col 0) (T.to_partition.rowg obj) :=
begin
rw [termination_eq_optimal_iff_find_pivot_column_eq_none],
split,
{ rintros ⟨_, hc⟩,
simpa * using find_pivot_column_eq_none feasible_simplex hc },
{ cases ht : (T.simplex w obj hT).2,
{ simp [*, termination_eq_while_iff] at * },
{ cases termination_eq_unbounded_iff_aux ht,
simp [*, not_optimal_of_unbounded_above right] },
{ simp [*, termination_eq_optimal_iff_find_pivot_column_eq_none] at * } }
end
lemma termination_eq_unbounded_iff {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T}
{w : tableau m n → bool} {obj : fin m} : (T.simplex w obj hT).2 = unbounded ↔
w (T.simplex w obj hT).1 = tt ∧ is_unbounded_above T (T.to_partition.rowg obj) :=
⟨termination_eq_unbounded_iff_aux,
begin
have := @not_optimal_of_unbounded_above m n (T.simplex w obj hT).1 (T.to_partition.rowg obj)
((T.simplex w obj hT).1.of_col 0),
cases ht : (T.simplex w obj hT).2;
simp [termination_eq_optimal_iff, termination_eq_while_iff, *] at *
end⟩
end simplex
section add_row
/-- adds a new row without making it a restricted variable. -/
def add_row (T : tableau m n) (fac : rvec (m + n)) (k : ℚ) : tableau (m + 1) n :=
{ to_matrix := λ i j, if hm : i.1 < m
then T.to_matrix (fin.cast_lt i hm) j
else fac 0 (T.to_partition.colg j) +
univ.sum (λ i' : fin m, fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i') * T.to_matrix i' j),
const := λ i j, if hm : i.1 < m
then T.const (fin.cast_lt i hm) j
else k +
univ.sum (λ i' : fin m, fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i') * T.const i' 0),
to_partition := T.to_partition.add_row,
restricted := T.restricted.map ⟨fin.castp,
λ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h, fin.eq_of_veq (fin.veq_of_eq h : _)⟩ }
@[simp] lemma add_row_to_partition (T : tableau m n) (fac : rvec (m + n)) (k : ℚ) :
(T.add_row fac k).to_partition = T.to_partition.add_row := rfl
lemma add_row_to_matrix (T : tableau m n) (fac : rvec (m + n)) (k : ℚ) :
(T.add_row fac k).to_matrix = λ i j, if hm : i.1 < m
then T.to_matrix (fin.cast_lt i hm) j else fac 0 (T.to_partition.colg j) +
univ.sum (λ i' : fin m, fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i') * T.to_matrix i' j) := rfl
lemma add_row_const (T : tableau m n) (fac : rvec (m + n)) (k : ℚ) :
(T.add_row fac k).const = λ i j, if hm : i.1 < m
then T.const (fin.cast_lt i hm) j else k +
univ.sum (λ i' : fin m, fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i') * T.const i' 0) := rfl
lemma add_row_restricted (T : tableau m n) (fac : rvec (m + n)) (k : ℚ) :
(T.add_row fac k).restricted = T.restricted.image fin.castp :=
by simp [add_row, map_eq_image]
-- @[simp] lemma fin.cast_lt_cast_succ {n : ℕ} (a : fin n) (h : a.1 < n) :
-- a.cast_succ.cast_lt h = a := by cases a; refl
lemma minor_mem_flat_of_mem_add_row_flat {T : tableau m n} {fac : rvec (m + n)} {k : ℚ}
{x : cvec (m + 1 + n)} : x ∈ (T.add_row fac k).flat → minor x fin.castp id ∈ T.flat :=
begin
rw [mem_flat_iff, mem_flat_iff],
intros h r,
have := h (fin.cast_succ r),
simp [add_row_rowg_cast_succ, add_row_const, add_row_to_matrix,
(show (fin.cast_succ r).val < m, from r.2), add_row_colg] at this,
simpa
end
lemma minor_mem_sol_set_of_mem_add_row_sol_set {T : tableau m n} {fac : rvec (m + n)} {k : ℚ}
{x : cvec (m + 1 + n)} : x ∈ (T.add_row fac k).sol_set → minor x fin.castp id ∈ T.sol_set :=
and_implies minor_mem_flat_of_mem_add_row_flat begin
assume h v,
simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq, add_row_restricted, mem_image, exists_imp_distrib] at h,
simpa [add_row_restricted, matrix.minor, id.def] using h (fin.castp v) v
end
lemma add_row_new_eq_sum_fac (T : tableau m n) (fac : rvec (m + n)) (k : ℚ)
(x : cvec (m + 1 + n)) (hx : x ∈ (T.add_row fac k).flat) :
x fin.lastp 0 = univ.sum (λ v : fin (m + n), fac 0 v * x (fin.castp v) 0) + k :=
calc x fin.lastp 0 = x ((T.add_row fac k).to_partition.rowg (fin.last _)) 0 :
by simp [add_row_rowg_last]
... = univ.sum (λ j : fin n, _) + (T.add_row fac k).const _ _ : mem_flat_iff.1 hx _
... = k +
univ.sum (λ j, (fac 0 (T.to_partition.colg j) * x (T.to_partition.add_row.colg j) 0)) +
(univ.sum (λ j, univ.sum (λ i, fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i j *
x (T.to_partition.add_row.colg j) 0))
+ univ.sum (λ i, fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.const i 0)) :
by simp [add_row_to_matrix, add_row_const, fin.last, add_mul, sum_add_distrib, sum_mul]
... = k +
univ.sum (λ j, (fac 0 (T.to_partition.colg j) * x (T.to_partition.add_row.colg j) 0)) +
(univ.sum (λ i, univ.sum (λ j, fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.to_matrix i j *
x (T.to_partition.add_row.colg j) 0))
+ univ.sum (λ i, fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i) * T.const i 0)) : by rw [sum_comm]
... = k +
univ.sum (λ j, (fac 0 (T.to_partition.colg j) * x (T.to_partition.add_row.colg j) 0)) +
univ.sum (λ i : fin m, (fac 0 (T.to_partition.rowg i) * x (fin.castp (T.to_partition.rowg i)) 0)) :
begin
rw [← sum_add_distrib],
have : ∀ r : fin m, x (fin.castp (T.to_partition.rowg r)) 0 =
sum univ (λ (c : fin n), T.to_matrix r c * x (fin.castp (T.to_partition.colg c)) 0) +
T.const r 0, from mem_flat_iff.1 (minor_mem_flat_of_mem_add_row_flat hx),
simp [this, mul_add, add_row_colg, mul_sum, mul_assoc]
end
... = ((univ.image T.to_partition.colg).sum (λ v, (fac 0 v * x (fin.castp v) 0)) +
(univ.image T.to_partition.rowg).sum (λ v, (fac 0 v * x (fin.castp v) 0))) + k :
by rw [sum_image, sum_image];
simp [add_row_rowg_cast_succ, add_row_colg, T.to_partition.injective_rowg.eq_iff,
T.to_partition.injective_colg.eq_iff]
... = _ : begin
rw [← sum_union],
congr,
simpa [finset.ext, eq_comm] using T.to_partition.eq_rowg_or_colg,
{ simp [finset.ext, eq_comm, T.to_partition.rowg_ne_colg] {contextual := tt} }
end
end add_row
open tableau.simplex tableau.simplex.termination
-- /-- Boolean returning whether or not it is consistent to make `obj` nonnegative.
-- Only makes sense for feasible tableaux. -/
-- def max_nonneg (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T) (obj : fin m) : bool :=
-- let T' := T.simplex (λ T', T'.const obj 0 < 0) hT obj in
-- match T'.2 with
-- | while := tt
-- | unbounded := tt
-- | optimal := ff
-- end
-- lemma max_nonneg_iff {T : tableau m n} {hT : T.feasible} {obj : fin m} :
-- max_nonneg T hT obj ↔ ∃ x : cvec (m + n), x ∈ T.sol_set ∧ 0 ≤ x (T.to_partition.rowg obj) 0 :=
-- let T' := T.simplex (λ T', T'.const obj 0 < 0) hT obj in
-- begin
-- cases h : T'.2,
-- { simp only [max_nonneg, h, bool.coe_sort_tt, coe_tt, true_iff],
-- rw [termination_eq_while_iff] at h,
-- use T'.1.of_col 0,
-- simpa [T'] using h },
-- { simp only [max_nonneg, h, bool.coe_sort_tt, coe_tt, true_iff],
-- rw [termination_eq_unbounded_iff, is_unbounded_above] at h,
-- tauto },
-- { simp only [max_nonneg, h, not_exists, false_iff, not_and, bool.coe_sort_ff, not_le],
-- rw [termination_eq_optimal_iff, is_optimal, to_bool_iff] at h,
-- assume x hx,
-- refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ h.1,
-- simpa using h.2 x hx }
-- end
section sign_of_max_row
def sign_of_max_row (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T) (obj : fin m) : ℤ :=
let T' := T.simplex (λ T', T'.const obj 0 ≤ 0) obj hT in
match T'.2 with
| while := 1
| unbounded := 1
| optimal := if T'.1.const obj 0 = 0 then 0 else -1
end
lemma sign_of_max_row_eq_zero {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T} {obj : fin m} :
sign_of_max_row T hT obj = 0 ↔
∃ x : cvec (m + n), x (T.to_partition.rowg obj) 0 = 0 ∧ is_optimal T x
(T.to_partition.rowg obj) :=
let T' := T.simplex (λ T', T'.const obj 0 ≤ 0) obj hT in
begin
cases h : T'.2,
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_while_iff, is_optimal, classical.not_forall,
not_exists, exists_prop, false_iff, not_and, not_le, to_bool_ff_iff, one_ne_zero] at *,
assume x hx0 hxs,
use [T'.1.of_col 0],
simpa [T', hx0] },
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_unbounded_iff, is_unbounded_above,
classical.not_forall, not_exists, exists_prop, false_iff, not_and, not_le, to_bool_iff,
one_ne_zero, is_optimal] at * {contextual := tt},
cases h.2 1 with y hy,
assume x hxs hx,
use [y, hy.1],
exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hy.2 },
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_optimal_iff, is_unbounded_above,
classical.not_forall, not_exists, exists_prop, false_iff, not_and, not_le, to_bool_iff,
one_ne_zero] at * {contextual := tt},
split_ifs with h0,
{ simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_iff],
refine ⟨_, _, _, h.2.2⟩;
simp [h0] },
{ simp only [is_optimal, not_exists, neg_eq_zero, one_ne_zero, false_iff, not_and],
assume x hx0 hsx ,
exact absurd (le_antisymm h.1 (by simpa [hx0] using h.2.2 x hsx)) h0 } }
end
lemma sign_of_max_row_eq_one {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T} {obj : fin m} :
sign_of_max_row T hT obj = 1 ↔
∃ x : cvec (m + n), x ∈ sol_set T ∧ 0 < x (T.to_partition.rowg obj) 0 :=
let T' := T.simplex (λ T', T'.const obj 0 ≤ 0) obj hT in
begin
cases h : T'.2,
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_while_iff, eq_self_iff_true, true_iff,
to_bool_ff_iff, not_le] at *,
exact ⟨T'.1.of_col 0, by simp *⟩ },
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_unbounded_iff, eq_self_iff_true,
true_iff, to_bool_iff] at *,
cases h.2 1 with y hy,
use [y, hy.1],
exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hy.2 },
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_optimal_iff, to_bool_iff] at *,
suffices : ∀ (x : matrix (fin (m + n)) (fin 1) ℚ), x ∈ sol_set T →
x (T.to_partition.rowg obj) 0 ≤ 0,
{ split_ifs; simpa [show ¬(-1 : ℤ) = 1, from dec_trivial] },
assume x hx,
exact le_trans (h.2.2 x hx) (by simpa using h.1) }
end
lemma sign_of_max_row_eq_neg_one {T : tableau m n} {hT : feasible T} {obj : fin m} :
sign_of_max_row T hT obj = -1 ↔
∀ x : cvec (m + n), x ∈ sol_set T → x (T.to_partition.rowg obj) 0 < 0 :=
let T' := T.simplex (λ T', T'.const obj 0 ≤ 0) obj hT in
begin
cases h : T'.2,
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_while_iff, false_iff, classical.not_forall,
not_lt, show (1 : ℤ) ≠ -1, from dec_trivial, to_bool_ff_iff, not_le] at *,
use T'.1.of_col 0,
simp [le_of_lt h] },
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_unbounded_iff, false_iff, classical.not_forall,
show (1 : ℤ) ≠ -1, from dec_trivial, to_bool_iff, not_lt, not_le] at *,
cases h.2 1 with y hy,
use [y, hy.1],
exact le_trans zero_le_one hy.2 },
{ simp only [sign_of_max_row, *, termination_eq_optimal_iff, to_bool_iff] at *,
split_ifs,
{ simp [show (0 : ℤ) ≠ -1, from dec_trivial, classical.not_forall],
use T'.1.of_col 0, simp * },
{ simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_iff],
assume x hx,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (h.2.2 x hx) (by apply lt_of_le_of_ne; simp; tauto) } }
end
end sign_of_max_row
section to_row
def to_row_pivot_row (T : tableau m n) (c : fin n) : option (fin m) :=
((list.fin_range m).filter (λ r, (T.to_partition.rowg r ∈ T.restricted ∧
T.to_matrix r c < 0))).argmax (λ r, T.const r 0 / T.to_matrix r c)
lemma feasible_to_row_pivot_row {T : tableau m n} (hT : feasible T) {r} (c : fin n)
(hr : r ∈ to_row_pivot_row T c) : feasible (T.pivot r c) :=
begin
simp only [to_row_pivot_row, list.mem_argmax_iff, list.mem_filter] at hr,
refine feasible_pivot hT (by tauto) (by tauto) _,
assume i hir hir0,
have hic0 : T.to_matrix i c < 0,
from neg_of_mul_pos_left hir0 (inv_nonpos.2 $ le_of_lt $ by tauto),
rw [abs_of_nonpos (div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_neg (hT _ hir) hic0),
abs_of_nonpos (div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_neg (hT r (by tauto)) hr.1.2.2), neg_le_neg_iff],
apply hr.2.1,
simp,
tauto
end
def to_row (T : tableau m n) (hT : feasible T) (c : fin n) : option (tableau m n) :=
to_row_pivot_row T c >>= λ r, T.pivot r c
end to_row
section assertge
end assertge
end tableau
section test
open tableau tableau.simplex
def list.to_matrix (m :ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list (list ℚ)) : matrix (fin m) (fin n) ℚ :=
λ i j, (l.nth_le i sorry).nth_le j sorry
def vector.to_matrix (m :ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : vector (vector ℚ n) m) : matrix (fin m) (fin n) ℚ:=
λ i j, (l.nth i).nth j
instance has_repr_fin_fun {n : ℕ} {α : Type*} [has_repr α] : has_repr (fin n → α) :=
⟨λ f, repr (vector.of_fn f).to_list⟩
def matrix.to_vector (A : matrix (fin m) (fin n) ℚ) : vector (vector ℚ n) m :=
(vector.of_fn A).map (λ v, (vector.of_fn v))
example (a b c d e : ℚ) : false :=
let T : tableau 3 2 :=
{ to_matrix := vector.to_matrix 3 2
⟨[⟨[a,b], rfl⟩, ⟨[c,d], rfl⟩, ⟨[-1, e], rfl⟩], rfl⟩,
const := 0,
restricted := univ,
to_partition := default _ } in
have hT : (T.pivot 2 0).to_matrix.to_vector = sorry :=
begin
simp only [T, pivot, matrix.to_vector, vector.to_matrix],
dsimp [vector.nth, list.nth_le, vector.of_fn, vector.map],
simp [(show (0 : fin 3) ≠ 2, from dec_trivial),
show (fin.succ 0 : fin 3) ≠ 2, from dec_trivial,
show (fin.succ (fin.succ 0) : fin 3) = 2, from rfl],
simp [bit0, bit1,
has_add.add, fin.add, has_one.one, has_zero.zero],
end
instance {m n} : has_repr (matrix (fin m) (fin n) ℚ) := has_repr_fin_fun
-- def T : tableau 4 5 :=
-- { to_matrix := list.to_matrix 4 5 [[-1, -3/4, 20, -1/2, 6], [0, 1/4, -8, -1, 9],
-- [0, 1/2, -12, -1/2, 3], [0,0,0,1,0]],
-- const := (list.to_matrix 1 4 [[0,0,0,1]])ᵀ,
-- to_partition := default _,
-- restricted := univ }
-- def T : tableau 4 5 :=
-- { to_matrix := list.to_matrix 4 5 [[1, 3/5, 20, 1/2, -6], [19, 1, -8, -1, 9],
-- [5, 1/2, -12, 1/2, 3], [13,0.1,11,21,0]],
-- const := (list.to_matrix 1 4 [[3,1,51,1]])ᵀ,
-- to_partition := default _,
-- restricted := univ }
-- set_option profiler true
-- #print tactic.eval_expr
def T : tableau 25 10 :=
{ to_matrix := list.to_matrix 25 10
[[0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, -1], [-1, 1, 0, -1, 1, 0, 1, -1, 0, 0],
[0, -1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0], [1, 1, 1, 0, 1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1],
[0, 1, 1, -1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1, 1], [0, -1, 1, -1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, -1],
[-1, 0, 0, -1, -1, 1, 1, 0, -1, -1], [-1, 0, 0, -1, 0, -1, 0, 0, -1, 1],
[-1, 0, 0, 1, -1, 1, -1, -1, 1, 0], [1, 0, 0, 0, 1, -1, 1, 0, -1, 1],
[0, -1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, -1, 0, 0], [-1, 1, -1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0],
[1, 1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 0, 0, -1, 0], [-1, -1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, -1, 0],
[0, 0, -1, 1, -1, 0, 0, 1, 0, -1], [-1, 0, -1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[1, 0, -1, 1, 0, -1, -1, 1, -1, 1], [-1, 1, -1, 1, -1, -1, -1, 1, -1, 1],
[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, -1, 1, -1, -1, 1], [-1, -1, -1, 1, 0, 1, -1, 1, 0, 0],
[-1, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, 1, -1, 0, 1], [-1, 0, 0, -1, 1, 1, 1, -1, 1, 0],
[0, -1, 0, 0, 0, -1, 0, 1, 0, -1], [1, -1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, -1],
[0, -1, -1, 0, 0, 0, -1, 0, 1, 0]],
const := λ i _, if i.1 < 8 then 0 else 1,
to_partition := default _,
restricted := univ.erase 30 } --(λ x, x.1 < 25) }
-- #eval tableau.sizeof _ _ T
-- #print tc.rec
-- #eval 1000 * 1000
-- run_cmd do tactic.is_def_eq `(1000000) `(1000 * 1000)
--#reduce let s := T.simplex (λ _, tt) dec_trivial 0 in s.2
#eval let s := T.simplex (λ _, tt) 0 dec_trivial in
s.1.to_partition.row_indices.1
-- (s.2, s.1.const 0 0, s.1.to_partition.row_indices.1)
end test
|
8b9e395f8ad2bce97e6d4911db93f484757d0cc1 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/linear_algebra/sesquilinear_form.lean | 2c505cca3a0492f4dd739f126b038e88059f8a82 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,299 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andreas Swerdlow
-/
import algebra.module.linear_map
import linear_algebra.bilinear_map
import linear_algebra.matrix.basis
import linear_algebra.linear_pmap
/-!
# Sesquilinear form
This files provides properties about sesquilinear forms. The maps considered are of the form
`M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R`, where `I₁ : R₁ →+* R` and `I₂ : R₂ →+* R` are ring homomorphisms and
`M₁` is a module over `R₁` and `M₂` is a module over `R₂`.
Sesquilinear forms are the special case that `M₁ = M₂`, `R₁ = R₂ = R`, and `I₁ = ring_hom.id R`.
Taking additionally `I₂ = ring_hom.id R`, then one obtains bilinear forms.
These forms are a special case of the bilinear maps defined in `bilinear_map.lean` and all basic
lemmas about construction and elementary calculations are found there.
## Main declarations
* `is_ortho`: states that two vectors are orthogonal with respect to a sesquilinear form
* `is_symm`, `is_alt`: states that a sesquilinear form is symmetric and alternating, respectively
* `orthogonal_bilin`: provides the orthogonal complement with respect to sesquilinear form
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sesquilinear_form#Over_arbitrary_rings>
## Tags
Sesquilinear form,
-/
open_locale big_operators
variables {R R₁ R₂ R₃ M M₁ M₂ K K₁ K₂ V V₁ V₂ n: Type*}
namespace linear_map
/-! ### Orthogonal vectors -/
section comm_ring
-- the `ₗ` subscript variables are for special cases about linear (as opposed to semilinear) maps
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring R₁] [add_comm_monoid M₁] [module R₁ M₁]
[comm_semiring R₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [module R₂ M₂]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₂ →+* R} {I₁' : R₁ →+* R}
/-- The proposition that two elements of a sesquilinear form space are orthogonal -/
def is_ortho (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) (x y) : Prop := B x y = 0
lemma is_ortho_def {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R} {x y} : B.is_ortho x y ↔ B x y = 0 := iff.rfl
lemma is_ortho_zero_left (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) (x) : is_ortho B (0 : M₁) x :=
by { dunfold is_ortho, rw [ map_zero B, zero_apply] }
lemma is_ortho_zero_right (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) (x) : is_ortho B x (0 : M₂) :=
map_zero (B x)
lemma is_ortho_flip {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] R} {x y} :
B.is_ortho x y ↔ B.flip.is_ortho y x :=
by simp_rw [is_ortho_def, flip_apply]
/-- A set of vectors `v` is orthogonal with respect to some bilinear form `B` if and only
if for all `i ≠ j`, `B (v i) (v j) = 0`. For orthogonality between two elements, use
`bilin_form.is_ortho` -/
def is_Ortho (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] R) (v : n → M₁) : Prop :=
pairwise (B.is_ortho on v)
lemma is_Ortho_def {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] R} {v : n → M₁} :
B.is_Ortho v ↔ ∀ i j : n, i ≠ j → B (v i) (v j) = 0 := iff.rfl
lemma is_Ortho_flip (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] R) {v : n → M₁} :
B.is_Ortho v ↔ B.flip.is_Ortho v :=
begin
simp_rw is_Ortho_def,
split; intros h i j hij,
{ rw flip_apply,
exact h j i (ne.symm hij) },
simp_rw flip_apply at h,
exact h j i (ne.symm hij),
end
end comm_ring
section field
variables [field K] [field K₁] [add_comm_group V₁] [module K₁ V₁]
[field K₂] [add_comm_group V₂] [module K₂ V₂]
{I₁ : K₁ →+* K} {I₂ : K₂ →+* K} {I₁' : K₁ →+* K}
{J₁ : K →+* K} {J₂ : K →+* K}
-- todo: this also holds for [comm_ring R] [is_domain R] when J₁ is invertible
lemma ortho_smul_left {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] K} {x y} {a : K₁} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(is_ortho B x y) ↔ (is_ortho B (a • x) y) :=
begin
dunfold is_ortho,
split; intro H,
{ rw [map_smulₛₗ₂, H, smul_zero]},
{ rw [map_smulₛₗ₂, smul_eq_zero] at H,
cases H,
{ rw I₁.map_eq_zero at H, trivial },
{ exact H }}
end
-- todo: this also holds for [comm_ring R] [is_domain R] when J₂ is invertible
lemma ortho_smul_right {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] K} {x y} {a : K₂} {ha : a ≠ 0} :
(is_ortho B x y) ↔ (is_ortho B x (a • y)) :=
begin
dunfold is_ortho,
split; intro H,
{ rw [map_smulₛₗ, H, smul_zero] },
{ rw [map_smulₛₗ, smul_eq_zero] at H,
cases H,
{ simp at H,
exfalso,
exact ha H },
{ exact H }}
end
/-- A set of orthogonal vectors `v` with respect to some sesquilinear form `B` is linearly
independent if for all `i`, `B (v i) (v i) ≠ 0`. -/
lemma linear_independent_of_is_Ortho {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] K} {v : n → V₁}
(hv₁ : B.is_Ortho v) (hv₂ : ∀ i, ¬ B.is_ortho (v i) (v i)) : linear_independent K₁ v :=
begin
classical,
rw linear_independent_iff',
intros s w hs i hi,
have : B (s.sum $ λ (i : n), w i • v i) (v i) = 0,
{ rw [hs, map_zero, zero_apply] },
have hsum : s.sum (λ (j : n), I₁(w j) * B (v j) (v i)) = I₁(w i) * B (v i) (v i),
{ apply finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem i hi,
intros j hj hij,
rw [is_Ortho_def.1 hv₁ _ _ hij, mul_zero], },
simp_rw [B.map_sum₂, map_smulₛₗ₂, smul_eq_mul, hsum] at this,
apply I₁.map_eq_zero.mp,
exact eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_right_eq_zero (hv₂ i) this,
end
end field
/-! ### Reflexive bilinear forms -/
section reflexive
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring R₁] [add_comm_monoid M₁] [module R₁ M₁]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R}
{B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] R}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is reflexive -/
def is_refl (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) : Prop :=
∀ (x y), B x y = 0 → B y x = 0
namespace is_refl
variable (H : B.is_refl)
lemma eq_zero : ∀ {x y}, B x y = 0 → B y x = 0 := λ x y, H x y
lemma ortho_comm {x y} : is_ortho B x y ↔ is_ortho B y x := ⟨eq_zero H, eq_zero H⟩
lemma dom_restrict_refl (H : B.is_refl) (p : submodule R₁ M₁) : (B.dom_restrict₁₂ p p).is_refl :=
λ _ _, by { simp_rw dom_restrict₁₂_apply, exact H _ _}
@[simp] lemma flip_is_refl_iff : B.flip.is_refl ↔ B.is_refl :=
⟨λ h x y H, h y x ((B.flip_apply _ _).trans H), λ h x y, h y x⟩
lemma ker_flip_eq_bot (H : B.is_refl) (h : B.ker = ⊥) : B.flip.ker = ⊥ :=
begin
refine ker_eq_bot'.mpr (λ _ hx, ker_eq_bot'.mp h _ _),
ext,
exact H _ _ (linear_map.congr_fun hx _),
end
lemma ker_eq_bot_iff_ker_flip_eq_bot (H : B.is_refl) : B.ker = ⊥ ↔ B.flip.ker = ⊥ :=
begin
refine ⟨ker_flip_eq_bot H, λ h, _⟩,
exact (congr_arg _ B.flip_flip.symm).trans (ker_flip_eq_bot (flip_is_refl_iff.mpr H) h),
end
end is_refl
end reflexive
/-! ### Symmetric bilinear forms -/
section symmetric
variables [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
{I : R →+* R} {B : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₗ[R] R}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is symmetric -/
def is_symm (B : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₗ[R] R) : Prop :=
∀ (x y), I (B x y) = B y x
namespace is_symm
protected lemma eq (H : B.is_symm) (x y) : I (B x y) = B y x := H x y
lemma is_refl (H : B.is_symm) : B.is_refl := λ x y H1, by { rw ←H.eq, simp [H1] }
lemma ortho_comm (H : B.is_symm) {x y} : is_ortho B x y ↔ is_ortho B y x := H.is_refl.ortho_comm
lemma dom_restrict_symm (H : B.is_symm) (p : submodule R M) : (B.dom_restrict₁₂ p p).is_symm :=
λ _ _, by { simp_rw dom_restrict₁₂_apply, exact H _ _}
end is_symm
lemma is_symm_iff_eq_flip {B : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R} : B.is_symm ↔ B = B.flip :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ ext,
rw [←h, flip_apply, ring_hom.id_apply] },
intros x y,
conv_lhs { rw h },
rw [flip_apply, ring_hom.id_apply],
end
end symmetric
/-! ### Alternating bilinear forms -/
section alternating
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_semiring R₁] [add_comm_monoid M₁] [module R₁ M₁]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R} {I : R₁ →+* R} {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] R}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is alternating -/
def is_alt (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) : Prop := ∀ x, B x x = 0
namespace is_alt
variable (H : B.is_alt)
include H
lemma self_eq_zero (x) : B x x = 0 := H x
lemma neg (x y) : - B x y = B y x :=
begin
have H1 : B (y + x) (y + x) = 0,
{ exact self_eq_zero H (y + x) },
simp [map_add, self_eq_zero H] at H1,
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at H1,
exact H1,
end
lemma is_refl : B.is_refl :=
begin
intros x y h,
rw [←neg H, h, neg_zero],
end
lemma ortho_comm {x y} : is_ortho B x y ↔ is_ortho B y x := H.is_refl.ortho_comm
end is_alt
lemma is_alt_iff_eq_neg_flip [no_zero_divisors R] [char_zero R] {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I] M₁ →ₛₗ[I] R} :
B.is_alt ↔ B = -B.flip :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ ext,
simp_rw [neg_apply, flip_apply],
exact (h.neg _ _).symm },
intros x,
let h' := congr_fun₂ h x x,
simp only [neg_apply, flip_apply, ←add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h',
exact add_self_eq_zero.mp h',
end
end alternating
end linear_map
namespace submodule
/-! ### The orthogonal complement -/
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring R₁] [add_comm_group M₁] [module R₁ M₁]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R}
{B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] R}
/-- The orthogonal complement of a submodule `N` with respect to some bilinear form is the set of
elements `x` which are orthogonal to all elements of `N`; i.e., for all `y` in `N`, `B x y = 0`.
Note that for general (neither symmetric nor antisymmetric) bilinear forms this definition has a
chirality; in addition to this "left" orthogonal complement one could define a "right" orthogonal
complement for which, for all `y` in `N`, `B y x = 0`. This variant definition is not currently
provided in mathlib. -/
def orthogonal_bilin (N : submodule R₁ M₁) (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) : submodule R₁ M₁ :=
{ carrier := { m | ∀ n ∈ N, B.is_ortho n m },
zero_mem' := λ x _, B.is_ortho_zero_right x,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy n hn,
by rw [linear_map.is_ortho, map_add, show B n x = 0, by exact hx n hn,
show B n y = 0, by exact hy n hn, zero_add],
smul_mem' := λ c x hx n hn,
by rw [linear_map.is_ortho, linear_map.map_smulₛₗ, show B n x = 0, by exact hx n hn,
smul_zero] }
variables {N L : submodule R₁ M₁}
@[simp] lemma mem_orthogonal_bilin_iff {m : M₁} :
m ∈ N.orthogonal_bilin B ↔ ∀ n ∈ N, B.is_ortho n m := iff.rfl
lemma orthogonal_bilin_le (h : N ≤ L) : L.orthogonal_bilin B ≤ N.orthogonal_bilin B :=
λ _ hn l hl, hn l (h hl)
lemma le_orthogonal_bilin_orthogonal_bilin (b : B.is_refl) :
N ≤ (N.orthogonal_bilin B).orthogonal_bilin B :=
λ n hn m hm, b _ _ (hm n hn)
end submodule
namespace linear_map
section orthogonal
variables [field K] [add_comm_group V] [module K V]
[field K₁] [add_comm_group V₁] [module K₁ V₁]
{J : K →+* K} {J₁ : K₁ →+* K} {J₁' : K₁ →+* K}
-- ↓ This lemma only applies in fields as we require `a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0`
lemma span_singleton_inf_orthogonal_eq_bot
(B : V₁ →ₛₗ[J₁] V₁ →ₛₗ[J₁'] K) (x : V₁) (hx : ¬ B.is_ortho x x) :
(K₁ ∙ x) ⊓ submodule.orthogonal_bilin (K₁ ∙ x) B = ⊥ :=
begin
rw ← finset.coe_singleton,
refine eq_bot_iff.2 (λ y h, _),
rcases mem_span_finset.1 h.1 with ⟨μ, rfl⟩,
have := h.2 x _,
{ rw finset.sum_singleton at this ⊢,
suffices hμzero : μ x = 0,
{ rw [hμzero, zero_smul, submodule.mem_bot] },
change B x (μ x • x) = 0 at this, rw [map_smulₛₗ, smul_eq_mul] at this,
exact or.elim (zero_eq_mul.mp this.symm)
(λ y, by { simp at y, exact y })
(λ hfalse, false.elim $ hx hfalse) },
{ rw submodule.mem_span; exact λ _ hp, hp $ finset.mem_singleton_self _ }
end
-- ↓ This lemma only applies in fields since we use the `mul_eq_zero`
lemma orthogonal_span_singleton_eq_to_lin_ker {B : V →ₗ[K] V →ₛₗ[J] K} (x : V) :
submodule.orthogonal_bilin (K ∙ x) B = (B x).ker :=
begin
ext y,
simp_rw [submodule.mem_orthogonal_bilin_iff, linear_map.mem_ker,
submodule.mem_span_singleton ],
split,
{ exact λ h, h x ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩ },
{ rintro h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩,
rw [is_ortho, map_smulₛₗ₂, smul_eq_zero],
exact or.intro_right _ h }
end
-- todo: Generalize this to sesquilinear maps
lemma span_singleton_sup_orthogonal_eq_top {B : V →ₗ[K] V →ₗ[K] K}
{x : V} (hx : ¬ B.is_ortho x x) :
(K ∙ x) ⊔ submodule.orthogonal_bilin (K ∙ x) B = ⊤ :=
begin
rw orthogonal_span_singleton_eq_to_lin_ker,
exact (B x).span_singleton_sup_ker_eq_top hx,
end
-- todo: Generalize this to sesquilinear maps
/-- Given a bilinear form `B` and some `x` such that `B x x ≠ 0`, the span of the singleton of `x`
is complement to its orthogonal complement. -/
lemma is_compl_span_singleton_orthogonal {B : V →ₗ[K] V →ₗ[K] K}
{x : V} (hx : ¬ B.is_ortho x x) : is_compl (K ∙ x) (submodule.orthogonal_bilin (K ∙ x) B) :=
{ inf_le_bot := eq_bot_iff.1 $
(span_singleton_inf_orthogonal_eq_bot B x hx),
top_le_sup := eq_top_iff.1 $ span_singleton_sup_orthogonal_eq_top hx }
end orthogonal
/-! ### Adjoint pairs -/
section adjoint_pair
section add_comm_monoid
variables [comm_semiring R]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
variables [add_comm_monoid M₁] [module R M₁]
variables [add_comm_monoid M₂] [module R M₂]
variables {B F : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R} {B' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] R} {B'' : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R}
variables {f f' : M →ₗ[R] M₁} {g g' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M}
variables (B B' f g)
/-- Given a pair of modules equipped with bilinear forms, this is the condition for a pair of
maps between them to be mutually adjoint. -/
def is_adjoint_pair := ∀ x y, B' (f x) y = B x (g y)
variables {B B' f g}
lemma is_adjoint_pair_iff_comp_eq_compl₂ :
is_adjoint_pair B B' f g ↔ B'.comp f = B.compl₂ g :=
begin
split; intros h,
{ ext x y, rw [comp_apply, compl₂_apply], exact h x y },
{ intros _ _, rw [←compl₂_apply, ←comp_apply, h] },
end
lemma is_adjoint_pair_zero : is_adjoint_pair B B' 0 0 :=
λ _ _, by simp only [zero_apply, map_zero]
lemma is_adjoint_pair_id : is_adjoint_pair B B 1 1 := λ x y, rfl
lemma is_adjoint_pair.add (h : is_adjoint_pair B B' f g) (h' : is_adjoint_pair B B' f' g') :
is_adjoint_pair B B' (f + f') (g + g') :=
λ x _, by rw [f.add_apply, g.add_apply, B'.map_add₂, (B x).map_add, h, h']
lemma is_adjoint_pair.comp {f' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂} {g' : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₁}
(h : is_adjoint_pair B B' f g) (h' : is_adjoint_pair B' B'' f' g') :
is_adjoint_pair B B'' (f'.comp f) (g.comp g') :=
λ _ _, by rw [linear_map.comp_apply, linear_map.comp_apply, h', h]
lemma is_adjoint_pair.mul
{f g f' g' : module.End R M} (h : is_adjoint_pair B B f g) (h' : is_adjoint_pair B B f' g') :
is_adjoint_pair B B (f * f') (g' * g) :=
h'.comp h
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [comm_ring R]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables [add_comm_group M₁] [module R M₁]
variables {B F : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R} {B' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] R}
variables {f f' : M →ₗ[R] M₁} {g g' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M}
lemma is_adjoint_pair.sub (h : is_adjoint_pair B B' f g) (h' : is_adjoint_pair B B' f' g') :
is_adjoint_pair B B' (f - f') (g - g') :=
λ x _, by rw [f.sub_apply, g.sub_apply, B'.map_sub₂, (B x).map_sub, h, h']
lemma is_adjoint_pair.smul (c : R) (h : is_adjoint_pair B B' f g) :
is_adjoint_pair B B' (c • f) (c • g) :=
λ _ _, by simp only [smul_apply, map_smul, smul_eq_mul, h _ _]
end add_comm_group
end adjoint_pair
/-! ### Self-adjoint pairs-/
section selfadjoint_pair
section add_comm_monoid
variables [comm_semiring R]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
variables (B F : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R)
/-- The condition for an endomorphism to be "self-adjoint" with respect to a pair of bilinear forms
on the underlying module. In the case that these two forms are identical, this is the usual concept
of self adjointness. In the case that one of the forms is the negation of the other, this is the
usual concept of skew adjointness. -/
def is_pair_self_adjoint (f : module.End R M) := is_adjoint_pair B F f f
/-- An endomorphism of a module is self-adjoint with respect to a bilinear form if it serves as an
adjoint for itself. -/
protected def is_self_adjoint (f : module.End R M) := is_adjoint_pair B B f f
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [comm_ring R]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables [add_comm_group M₁] [module R M₁]
(B F : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R)
/-- The set of pair-self-adjoint endomorphisms are a submodule of the type of all endomorphisms. -/
def is_pair_self_adjoint_submodule : submodule R (module.End R M) :=
{ carrier := { f | is_pair_self_adjoint B F f },
zero_mem' := is_adjoint_pair_zero,
add_mem' := λ f g hf hg, hf.add hg,
smul_mem' := λ c f h, h.smul c, }
/-- An endomorphism of a module is skew-adjoint with respect to a bilinear form if its negation
serves as an adjoint. -/
def is_skew_adjoint (f : module.End R M) := is_adjoint_pair B B f (-f)
/-- The set of self-adjoint endomorphisms of a module with bilinear form is a submodule. (In fact
it is a Jordan subalgebra.) -/
def self_adjoint_submodule := is_pair_self_adjoint_submodule B B
/-- The set of skew-adjoint endomorphisms of a module with bilinear form is a submodule. (In fact
it is a Lie subalgebra.) -/
def skew_adjoint_submodule := is_pair_self_adjoint_submodule (-B) B
variables {B F}
@[simp] lemma mem_is_pair_self_adjoint_submodule (f : module.End R M) :
f ∈ is_pair_self_adjoint_submodule B F ↔ is_pair_self_adjoint B F f :=
iff.rfl
lemma is_pair_self_adjoint_equiv (e : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M) (f : module.End R M) :
is_pair_self_adjoint B F f ↔
is_pair_self_adjoint (B.compl₁₂ ↑e ↑e) (F.compl₁₂ ↑e ↑e) (e.symm.conj f) :=
begin
have hₗ : (F.compl₁₂ (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M)).comp (e.symm.conj f) =
(F.comp f).compl₁₂ (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) :=
by { ext, simp only [linear_equiv.symm_conj_apply, coe_comp, linear_equiv.coe_coe, compl₁₂_apply,
linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply], },
have hᵣ : (B.compl₁₂ (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M)).compl₂ (e.symm.conj f) =
(B.compl₂ f).compl₁₂ (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) (↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) :=
by { ext, simp only [linear_equiv.symm_conj_apply, compl₂_apply, coe_comp, linear_equiv.coe_coe,
compl₁₂_apply, linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply] },
have he : function.surjective (⇑(↑e : M₁ →ₗ[R] M) : M₁ → M) := e.surjective,
simp_rw [is_pair_self_adjoint, is_adjoint_pair_iff_comp_eq_compl₂, hₗ, hᵣ,
compl₁₂_inj he he],
end
lemma is_skew_adjoint_iff_neg_self_adjoint (f : module.End R M) :
B.is_skew_adjoint f ↔ is_adjoint_pair (-B) B f f :=
show (∀ x y, B (f x) y = B x ((-f) y)) ↔ ∀ x y, B (f x) y = (-B) x (f y),
by simp
@[simp] lemma mem_self_adjoint_submodule (f : module.End R M) :
f ∈ B.self_adjoint_submodule ↔ B.is_self_adjoint f := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_skew_adjoint_submodule (f : module.End R M) :
f ∈ B.skew_adjoint_submodule ↔ B.is_skew_adjoint f :=
by { rw is_skew_adjoint_iff_neg_self_adjoint, exact iff.rfl }
end add_comm_group
end selfadjoint_pair
/-! ### Nondegenerate bilinear forms -/
section nondegenerate
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring R₁] [add_comm_monoid M₁] [module R₁ M₁]
[comm_semiring R₂] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [module R₂ M₂]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₂ →+* R} {I₁' : R₁ →+* R}
/-- A bilinear form is called left-separating if
the only element that is left-orthogonal to every other element is `0`; i.e.,
for every nonzero `x` in `M₁`, there exists `y` in `M₂` with `B x y ≠ 0`.-/
def separating_left (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) : Prop :=
∀ x : M₁, (∀ y : M₂, B x y = 0) → x = 0
/-- A bilinear form is called right-separating if
the only element that is right-orthogonal to every other element is `0`; i.e.,
for every nonzero `y` in `M₂`, there exists `x` in `M₁` with `B x y ≠ 0`.-/
def separating_right (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) : Prop :=
∀ y : M₂, (∀ x : M₁, B x y = 0) → y = 0
/-- A bilinear form is called non-degenerate if it is left-separating and right-separating. -/
def nondegenerate (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R) : Prop := separating_left B ∧ separating_right B
@[simp] lemma flip_separating_right {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R} :
B.flip.separating_right ↔ B.separating_left := ⟨λ hB x hy, hB x hy, λ hB x hy, hB x hy⟩
@[simp] lemma flip_separating_left {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R} :
B.flip.separating_left ↔ separating_right B := by rw [←flip_separating_right, flip_flip]
@[simp] lemma flip_nondegenerate {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R} :
B.flip.nondegenerate ↔ B.nondegenerate :=
iff.trans and.comm (and_congr flip_separating_right flip_separating_left)
lemma separating_left_iff_linear_nontrivial {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R} :
B.separating_left ↔ ∀ x : M₁, B x = 0 → x = 0 :=
begin
split; intros h x hB,
{ let h' := h x,
simp only [hB, zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const] at h',
exact h' },
have h' : B x = 0 := by { ext, rw [zero_apply], exact hB _ },
exact h x h',
end
lemma separating_right_iff_linear_flip_nontrivial {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R} :
B.separating_right ↔ ∀ y : M₂, B.flip y = 0 → y = 0 :=
by rw [←flip_separating_left, separating_left_iff_linear_nontrivial]
/-- A bilinear form is left-separating if and only if it has a trivial kernel. -/
theorem separating_left_iff_ker_eq_bot {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R} :
B.separating_left ↔ B.ker = ⊥ :=
iff.trans separating_left_iff_linear_nontrivial linear_map.ker_eq_bot'.symm
/-- A bilinear form is right-separating if and only if its flip has a trivial kernel. -/
theorem separating_right_iff_flip_ker_eq_bot {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] R} :
B.separating_right ↔ B.flip.ker = ⊥ :=
by rw [←flip_separating_left, separating_left_iff_ker_eq_bot]
end comm_semiring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{I I' : R →+* R}
lemma is_refl.nondegenerate_of_separating_left {B : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R}
(hB : B.is_refl) (hB' : B.separating_left) : B.nondegenerate :=
begin
refine ⟨hB', _⟩,
rw [separating_right_iff_flip_ker_eq_bot, hB.ker_eq_bot_iff_ker_flip_eq_bot.mp],
rwa ←separating_left_iff_ker_eq_bot,
end
lemma is_refl.nondegenerate_of_separating_right {B : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R}
(hB : B.is_refl) (hB' : B.separating_right) : B.nondegenerate :=
begin
refine ⟨_, hB'⟩,
rw [separating_left_iff_ker_eq_bot, hB.ker_eq_bot_iff_ker_flip_eq_bot.mpr],
rwa ←separating_right_iff_flip_ker_eq_bot,
end
/-- The restriction of a reflexive bilinear form `B` onto a submodule `W` is
nondegenerate if `W` has trivial intersection with its orthogonal complement,
that is `disjoint W (W.orthogonal_bilin B)`. -/
lemma nondegenerate_restrict_of_disjoint_orthogonal
{B : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R} (hB : B.is_refl)
{W : submodule R M} (hW : disjoint W (W.orthogonal_bilin B)) :
(B.dom_restrict₁₂ W W).nondegenerate :=
begin
refine (hB.dom_restrict_refl W).nondegenerate_of_separating_left _,
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ b₁,
rw [submodule.mk_eq_zero, ← submodule.mem_bot R],
refine hW ⟨hx, λ y hy, _⟩,
specialize b₁ ⟨y, hy⟩,
simp_rw [dom_restrict₁₂_apply, submodule.coe_mk] at b₁,
rw hB.ortho_comm,
exact b₁,
end
/-- An orthogonal basis with respect to a left-separating bilinear form has no self-orthogonal
elements. -/
lemma is_Ortho.not_is_ortho_basis_self_of_separating_left [nontrivial R]
{B : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₛₗ[I'] R} {v : basis n R M} (h : B.is_Ortho v) (hB : B.separating_left)
(i : n) : ¬B.is_ortho (v i) (v i) :=
begin
intro ho,
refine v.ne_zero i (hB (v i) $ λ m, _),
obtain ⟨vi, rfl⟩ := v.repr.symm.surjective m,
rw [basis.repr_symm_apply, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum, map_sum],
apply finset.sum_eq_zero,
rintros j -,
rw map_smulₛₗ,
convert mul_zero _ using 2,
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j,
{ exact ho },
{ exact h i j hij },
end
/-- An orthogonal basis with respect to a right-separating bilinear form has no self-orthogonal
elements. -/
lemma is_Ortho.not_is_ortho_basis_self_of_separating_right [nontrivial R]
{B : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₛₗ[I'] R} {v : basis n R M} (h : B.is_Ortho v) (hB : B.separating_right)
(i : n) : ¬B.is_ortho (v i) (v i) :=
begin
rw is_Ortho_flip at h,
rw is_ortho_flip,
exact h.not_is_ortho_basis_self_of_separating_left (flip_separating_left.mpr hB) i,
end
/-- Given an orthogonal basis with respect to a bilinear form, the bilinear form is left-separating
if the basis has no elements which are self-orthogonal. -/
lemma is_Ortho.separating_left_of_not_is_ortho_basis_self [no_zero_divisors R]
{B : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R} (v : basis n R M) (hO : B.is_Ortho v) (h : ∀ i, ¬B.is_ortho (v i) (v i)) :
B.separating_left :=
begin
intros m hB,
obtain ⟨vi, rfl⟩ := v.repr.symm.surjective m,
rw linear_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff,
ext i,
rw [finsupp.zero_apply],
specialize hB (v i),
simp_rw [basis.repr_symm_apply, finsupp.total_apply, finsupp.sum, map_sum₂, map_smulₛₗ₂,
smul_eq_mul] at hB,
rw finset.sum_eq_single i at hB,
{ exact eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_right_eq_zero (h i) hB, },
{ intros j hj hij, convert mul_zero _ using 2, exact hO j i hij, },
{ intros hi, convert zero_mul _ using 2, exact finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp hi }
end
/-- Given an orthogonal basis with respect to a bilinear form, the bilinear form is right-separating
if the basis has no elements which are self-orthogonal. -/
lemma is_Ortho.separating_right_iff_not_is_ortho_basis_self [no_zero_divisors R]
{B : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R} (v : basis n R M) (hO : B.is_Ortho v) (h : ∀ i, ¬B.is_ortho (v i) (v i)) :
B.separating_right :=
begin
rw is_Ortho_flip at hO,
rw [←flip_separating_left],
refine is_Ortho.separating_left_of_not_is_ortho_basis_self v hO (λ i, _),
rw is_ortho_flip,
exact h i,
end
/-- Given an orthogonal basis with respect to a bilinear form, the bilinear form is nondegenerate
if the basis has no elements which are self-orthogonal. -/
lemma is_Ortho.nondegenerate_of_not_is_ortho_basis_self [no_zero_divisors R]
{B : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R} (v : basis n R M) (hO : B.is_Ortho v) (h : ∀ i, ¬B.is_ortho (v i) (v i)) :
B.nondegenerate :=
⟨is_Ortho.separating_left_of_not_is_ortho_basis_self v hO h,
is_Ortho.separating_right_iff_not_is_ortho_basis_self v hO h⟩
end comm_ring
end nondegenerate
end linear_map
|
29a3ecfc957449b9c97d5b502e269d4a1fa8d31a | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/logic/function/basic.lean | 11de65eabc655a66be9f16c39fb6a15d595d8c7f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,343 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import logic.basic
import data.option.defs
/-!
# Miscellaneous function constructions and lemmas
-/
universes u v w
namespace function
section
variables {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
/-- Evaluate a function at an argument. Useful if you want to talk about the partially applied
`function.eval x : (Π x, β x) → β x`. -/
@[reducible] def eval {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : Π x, β x) : β x := f x
@[simp] lemma eval_apply {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : Π x, β x) : eval x f = f x := rfl
lemma comp_apply {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {φ : Sort w} (f : β → φ) (g : α → β) (a : α) :
(f ∘ g) a = f (g a) := rfl
lemma const_def {y : β} : (λ x : α, y) = const α y := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_apply {y : β} {x : α} : const α y x = y := rfl
@[simp] lemma const_comp {f : α → β} {c : γ} : const β c ∘ f = const α c := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_const {f : β → γ} {b : β} : f ∘ const α b = const α (f b) := rfl
lemma id_def : @id α = λ x, x := rfl
lemma hfunext {α α': Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {β' : α' → Sort v} {f : Πa, β a} {f' : Πa, β' a}
(hα : α = α') (h : ∀a a', a == a' → f a == f' a') : f == f' :=
begin
subst hα,
have : ∀a, f a == f' a,
{ intro a, exact h a a (heq.refl a) },
have : β = β',
{ funext a, exact type_eq_of_heq (this a) },
subst this,
apply heq_of_eq,
funext a,
exact eq_of_heq (this a)
end
lemma funext_iff {β : α → Sort*} {f₁ f₂ : Π (x : α), β x} : f₁ = f₂ ↔ (∀a, f₁ a = f₂ a) :=
iff.intro (assume h a, h ▸ rfl) funext
protected lemma bijective.injective {f : α → β} (hf : bijective f) : injective f := hf.1
protected lemma bijective.surjective {f : α → β} (hf : bijective f) : surjective f := hf.2
theorem injective.eq_iff (I : injective f) {a b : α} :
f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
⟨@I _ _, congr_arg f⟩
theorem injective.eq_iff' (I : injective f) {a b : α} {c : β} (h : f b = c) :
f a = c ↔ a = b :=
h ▸ I.eq_iff
lemma injective.ne (hf : injective f) {a₁ a₂ : α} : a₁ ≠ a₂ → f a₁ ≠ f a₂ :=
mt (assume h, hf h)
lemma injective.ne_iff (hf : injective f) {x y : α} : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
⟨mt $ congr_arg f, hf.ne⟩
lemma injective.ne_iff' (hf : injective f) {x y : α} {z : β} (h : f y = z) :
f x ≠ z ↔ x ≠ y :=
h ▸ hf.ne_iff
/-- If the co-domain `β` of an injective function `f : α → β` has decidable equality, then
the domain `α` also has decidable equality. -/
def injective.decidable_eq [decidable_eq β] (I : injective f) : decidable_eq α :=
λ a b, decidable_of_iff _ I.eq_iff
lemma injective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (I : injective (f ∘ g)) : injective g :=
λ x y h, I $ show f (g x) = f (g y), from congr_arg f h
lemma injective.of_comp_iff {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) (g : γ → α) :
injective (f ∘ g) ↔ injective g :=
⟨injective.of_comp, hf.comp⟩
lemma injective.of_comp_iff' (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : bijective g) :
injective (f ∘ g) ↔ injective f :=
⟨ λ h x y, let ⟨x', hx⟩ := hg.surjective x, ⟨y', hy⟩ := hg.surjective y in
hx ▸ hy ▸ λ hf, h hf ▸ rfl,
λ h, h.comp hg.injective⟩
lemma injective_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] (f : α → β) :
injective f :=
λ a b ab, subsingleton.elim _ _
lemma injective.dite (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
{f : {a : α // p a} → β} {f' : {a : α // ¬ p a} → β}
(hf : injective f) (hf' : injective f')
(im_disj : ∀ {x x' : α} {hx : p x} {hx' : ¬ p x'}, f ⟨x, hx⟩ ≠ f' ⟨x', hx'⟩) :
function.injective (λ x, if h : p x then f ⟨x, h⟩ else f' ⟨x, h⟩) :=
λ x₁ x₂ h, begin
dsimp only at h,
by_cases h₁ : p x₁; by_cases h₂ : p x₂,
{ rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h, injection (hf h), },
{ rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h, exact (im_disj h).elim, },
{ rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h, exact (im_disj h.symm).elim, },
{ rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h, injection (hf' h), },
end
lemma surjective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (S : surjective (f ∘ g)) : surjective f :=
λ y, let ⟨x, h⟩ := S y in ⟨g x, h⟩
lemma surjective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : surjective g) :
surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ surjective f :=
⟨surjective.of_comp, λ h, h.comp hg⟩
lemma surjective.of_comp_iff' {f : α → β} (hf : bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ surjective g :=
⟨λ h x, let ⟨x', hx'⟩ := h (f x) in ⟨x', hf.injective hx'⟩, hf.surjective.comp⟩
instance decidable_eq_pfun (p : Prop) [decidable p] (α : p → Type*)
[Π hp, decidable_eq (α hp)] : decidable_eq (Π hp, α hp)
| f g := decidable_of_iff (∀ hp, f hp = g hp) funext_iff.symm
theorem surjective.forall {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) :=
⟨λ h x, h (f x), λ h y, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y in hx ▸ h x⟩
theorem surjective.forall₂ {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.forall.trans $ forall_congr $ λ x, hf.forall
theorem surjective.forall₃ {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.forall.trans $ forall_congr $ λ x, hf.forall₂
theorem surjective.exists {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) :=
⟨λ ⟨y, hy⟩, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y in ⟨x, hx.symm ▸ hy⟩, λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨f x, hx⟩⟩
theorem surjective.exists₂ {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.exists.trans $ exists_congr $ λ x, hf.exists
theorem surjective.exists₃ {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.exists.trans $ exists_congr $ λ x, hf.exists₂
lemma bijective_iff_exists_unique (f : α → β) : bijective f ↔
∀ b : β, ∃! (a : α), f a = b :=
⟨ λ hf b, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hf.surjective b in ⟨a, ha, λ a' ha', hf.injective (ha'.trans ha.symm)⟩,
λ he, ⟨
λ a a' h, unique_of_exists_unique (he (f a')) h rfl,
λ b, exists_of_exists_unique (he b) ⟩⟩
/-- Shorthand for using projection notation with `function.bijective_iff_exists_unique`. -/
lemma bijective.exists_unique {f : α → β} (hf : bijective f) (b : β) : ∃! (a : α), f a = b :=
(bijective_iff_exists_unique f).mp hf b
lemma bijective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : bijective g) :
bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ bijective f :=
and_congr (injective.of_comp_iff' _ hg) (surjective.of_comp_iff _ hg.surjective)
lemma bijective.of_comp_iff' {f : α → β} (hf : bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
function.bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ function.bijective g :=
and_congr (injective.of_comp_iff hf.injective _) (surjective.of_comp_iff' hf _)
/-- **Cantor's diagonal argument** implies that there are no surjective functions from `α`
to `set α`. -/
theorem cantor_surjective {α} (f : α → set α) : ¬ function.surjective f | h :=
let ⟨D, e⟩ := h (λ a, ¬ f a a) in
(iff_not_self (f D D)).1 $ iff_of_eq (congr_fun e D)
/-- **Cantor's diagonal argument** implies that there are no injective functions from `set α`
to `α`. -/
theorem cantor_injective {α : Type*} (f : (set α) → α) :
¬ function.injective f | i :=
cantor_surjective (λ a b, ∀ U, a = f U → U b) $
right_inverse.surjective (λ U, funext $ λ a, propext ⟨λ h, h U rfl, λ h' U' e, i e ▸ h'⟩)
/-- `g` is a partial inverse to `f` (an injective but not necessarily
surjective function) if `g y = some x` implies `f x = y`, and `g y = none`
implies that `y` is not in the range of `f`. -/
def is_partial_inv {α β} (f : α → β) (g : β → option α) : Prop :=
∀ x y, g y = some x ↔ f x = y
theorem is_partial_inv_left {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g) (x) : g (f x) = some x :=
(H _ _).2 rfl
theorem injective_of_partial_inv {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g) : injective f :=
λ a b h, option.some.inj $ ((H _ _).2 h).symm.trans ((H _ _).2 rfl)
theorem injective_of_partial_inv_right {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : is_partial_inv f g)
(x y b) (h₁ : b ∈ g x) (h₂ : b ∈ g y) : x = y :=
((H _ _).1 h₁).symm.trans ((H _ _).1 h₂)
theorem left_inverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse f g) : f ∘ g = id :=
funext h
theorem left_inverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : left_inverse f g ↔ f ∘ g = id :=
⟨left_inverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem right_inverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : right_inverse f g) : g ∘ f = id :=
funext h
theorem right_inverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : right_inverse f g ↔ g ∘ f = id :=
⟨right_inverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem left_inverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β}
(hf : left_inverse f g) (hh : left_inverse h i) : left_inverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
assume a, show h (f (g (i a))) = a, by rw [hf (i a), hh a]
theorem right_inverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β}
(hf : right_inverse f g) (hh : right_inverse h i) : right_inverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
left_inverse.comp hh hf
theorem left_inverse.right_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse g f) :
right_inverse f g := h
theorem right_inverse.left_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : right_inverse g f) :
left_inverse f g := h
theorem left_inverse.surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse f g) :
surjective f :=
h.right_inverse.surjective
theorem right_inverse.injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : right_inverse f g) :
injective f :=
h.left_inverse.injective
theorem left_inverse.eq_right_inverse {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} (h₁ : left_inverse g₁ f)
(h₂ : right_inverse g₂ f) :
g₁ = g₂ :=
calc g₁ = g₁ ∘ f ∘ g₂ : by rw [h₂.comp_eq_id, comp.right_id]
... = g₂ : by rw [← comp.assoc, h₁.comp_eq_id, comp.left_id]
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
/-- We can use choice to construct explicitly a partial inverse for
a given injective function `f`. -/
noncomputable def partial_inv {α β} (f : α → β) (b : β) : option α :=
if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (classical.some h) else none
theorem partial_inv_of_injective {α β} {f : α → β} (I : injective f) :
is_partial_inv f (partial_inv f) | a b :=
⟨λ h, if h' : ∃ a, f a = b then begin
rw [partial_inv, dif_pos h'] at h,
injection h with h, subst h,
apply classical.some_spec h'
end else by rw [partial_inv, dif_neg h'] at h; contradiction,
λ e, e ▸ have h : ∃ a', f a' = f a, from ⟨_, rfl⟩,
(dif_pos h).trans (congr_arg _ (I $ classical.some_spec h))⟩
theorem partial_inv_left {α β} {f : α → β} (I : injective f) : ∀ x, partial_inv f (f x) = some x :=
is_partial_inv_left (partial_inv_of_injective I)
end
section inv_fun
variables {α : Type u} [n : nonempty α] {β : Sort v} {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β}
include n
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
/-- Construct the inverse for a function `f` on domain `s`. This function is a right inverse of `f`
on `f '' s`. For a computable version, see `function.injective.inv_of_mem_range`. -/
noncomputable def inv_fun_on (f : α → β) (s : set α) (b : β) : α :=
if h : ∃a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b then classical.some h else classical.choice n
theorem inv_fun_on_pos (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b ∈ s ∧ f (inv_fun_on f s b) = b :=
by rw [bex_def] at h; rw [inv_fun_on, dif_pos h]; exact classical.some_spec h
theorem inv_fun_on_mem (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b ∈ s := (inv_fun_on_pos h).left
theorem inv_fun_on_eq (h : ∃a∈s, f a = b) : f (inv_fun_on f s b) = b := (inv_fun_on_pos h).right
theorem inv_fun_on_eq' (h : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), f x = f y → x = y) (ha : a ∈ s) :
inv_fun_on f s (f a) = a :=
have ∃a'∈s, f a' = f a, from ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩,
h _ (inv_fun_on_mem this) _ ha (inv_fun_on_eq this)
theorem inv_fun_on_neg (h : ¬ ∃a∈s, f a = b) : inv_fun_on f s b = classical.choice n :=
by rw [bex_def] at h; rw [inv_fun_on, dif_neg h]
/-- The inverse of a function (which is a left inverse if `f` is injective
and a right inverse if `f` is surjective). -/
noncomputable def inv_fun (f : α → β) : β → α := inv_fun_on f set.univ
theorem inv_fun_eq (h : ∃a, f a = b) : f (inv_fun f b) = b :=
inv_fun_on_eq $ let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨a, trivial, ha⟩
lemma inv_fun_neg (h : ¬ ∃ a, f a = b) : inv_fun f b = classical.choice n :=
by refine inv_fun_on_neg (mt _ h); exact assume ⟨a, _, ha⟩, ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem inv_fun_eq_of_injective_of_right_inverse {g : β → α}
(hf : injective f) (hg : right_inverse g f) : inv_fun f = g :=
funext $ assume b,
hf begin rw [hg b], exact inv_fun_eq ⟨g b, hg b⟩ end
lemma right_inverse_inv_fun (hf : surjective f) : right_inverse (inv_fun f) f :=
assume b, inv_fun_eq $ hf b
lemma left_inverse_inv_fun (hf : injective f) : left_inverse (inv_fun f) f :=
assume b,
have f (inv_fun f (f b)) = f b,
from inv_fun_eq ⟨b, rfl⟩,
hf this
lemma inv_fun_surjective (hf : injective f) : surjective (inv_fun f) :=
(left_inverse_inv_fun hf).surjective
lemma inv_fun_comp (hf : injective f) : inv_fun f ∘ f = id := funext $ left_inverse_inv_fun hf
end inv_fun
section inv_fun
variables {α : Type u} [i : nonempty α] {β : Sort v} {f : α → β}
include i
lemma injective.has_left_inverse (hf : injective f) : has_left_inverse f :=
⟨inv_fun f, left_inverse_inv_fun hf⟩
lemma injective_iff_has_left_inverse : injective f ↔ has_left_inverse f :=
⟨injective.has_left_inverse, has_left_inverse.injective⟩
end inv_fun
section surj_inv
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {f : α → β}
/-- The inverse of a surjective function. (Unlike `inv_fun`, this does not require
`α` to be inhabited.) -/
noncomputable def surj_inv {f : α → β} (h : surjective f) (b : β) : α := classical.some (h b)
lemma surj_inv_eq (h : surjective f) (b) : f (surj_inv h b) = b := classical.some_spec (h b)
lemma right_inverse_surj_inv (hf : surjective f) : right_inverse (surj_inv hf) f :=
surj_inv_eq hf
lemma left_inverse_surj_inv (hf : bijective f) : left_inverse (surj_inv hf.2) f :=
right_inverse_of_injective_of_left_inverse hf.1 (right_inverse_surj_inv hf.2)
lemma surjective.has_right_inverse (hf : surjective f) : has_right_inverse f :=
⟨_, right_inverse_surj_inv hf⟩
lemma surjective_iff_has_right_inverse : surjective f ↔ has_right_inverse f :=
⟨surjective.has_right_inverse, has_right_inverse.surjective⟩
lemma bijective_iff_has_inverse : bijective f ↔ ∃ g, left_inverse g f ∧ right_inverse g f :=
⟨λ hf, ⟨_, left_inverse_surj_inv hf, right_inverse_surj_inv hf.2⟩,
λ ⟨g, gl, gr⟩, ⟨gl.injective, gr.surjective⟩⟩
lemma injective_surj_inv (h : surjective f) : injective (surj_inv h) :=
(right_inverse_surj_inv h).injective
lemma surjective_to_subsingleton [na : nonempty α] [subsingleton β] (f : α → β) :
surjective f :=
λ y, let ⟨a⟩ := na in ⟨a, subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
end surj_inv
section update
variables {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {α' : Sort w} [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq α']
/-- Replacing the value of a function at a given point by a given value. -/
def update (f : Πa, β a) (a' : α) (v : β a') (a : α) : β a :=
if h : a = a' then eq.rec v h.symm else f a
/-- On non-dependent functions, `function.update` can be expressed as an `ite` -/
lemma update_apply {β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) (b : β) (a : α) :
update f a' b a = if a = a' then b else f a :=
begin
dunfold update,
congr,
funext,
rw eq_rec_constant,
end
@[simp] lemma update_same (a : α) (v : β a) (f : Πa, β a) : update f a v a = v :=
dif_pos rfl
lemma update_injective (f : Πa, β a) (a' : α) : injective (update f a') :=
λ v v' h, have _ := congr_fun h a', by rwa [update_same, update_same] at this
@[simp] lemma update_noteq {a a' : α} (h : a ≠ a') (v : β a') (f : Πa, β a) :
update f a' v a = f a :=
dif_neg h
lemma forall_update_iff (f : Π a, β a) {a : α} {b : β a} (p : Π a, β a → Prop) :
(∀ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ p a b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, p x (f x) :=
calc (∀ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ ∀ x, (x = a ∨ x ≠ a) → p x (update f a b x) :
by simp only [ne.def, classical.em, forall_prop_of_true]
... ↔ p a b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, p x (f x) :
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] { contextual := tt }
lemma update_eq_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : Π a, β a} :
update f a b = g ↔ b = g a ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, f x = g x :=
funext_iff.trans $ forall_update_iff _ (λ x y, y = g x)
lemma eq_update_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : Π a, β a} :
g = update f a b ↔ g a = b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, g x = f x :=
funext_iff.trans $ forall_update_iff _ (λ x y, g x = y)
@[simp] lemma update_eq_self (a : α) (f : Πa, β a) : update f a (f a) = f :=
update_eq_iff.2 ⟨rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
lemma update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' {α'} (g : Π a, β a) {f : α' → α} {i : α} (a : β i)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ i) :
(λ j, (update g i a) (f j)) = (λ j, g (f j)) :=
funext $ λ x, update_noteq (h _) _ _
/-- Non-dependent version of `function.update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne'` -/
lemma update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne {α β : Sort*} (g : α' → β) {f : α → α'} {i : α'} (a : β)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ i) :
(update g i a) ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' g a h
lemma update_comp_eq_of_injective' (g : Π a, β a) {f : α' → α} (hf : function.injective f)
(i : α') (a : β (f i)) :
(λ j, update g (f i) a (f j)) = update (λ i, g (f i)) i a :=
eq_update_iff.2 ⟨update_same _ _ _, λ j hj, update_noteq (hf.ne hj) _ _⟩
/-- Non-dependent version of `function.update_comp_eq_of_injective'` -/
lemma update_comp_eq_of_injective {β : Sort*} (g : α' → β) {f : α → α'}
(hf : function.injective f) (i : α) (a : β) :
(function.update g (f i) a) ∘ f = function.update (g ∘ f) i a :=
update_comp_eq_of_injective' g hf i a
lemma apply_update {ι : Sort*} [decidable_eq ι] {α β : ι → Sort*}
(f : Π i, α i → β i) (g : Π i, α i) (i : ι) (v : α i) (j : ι) :
f j (update g i v j) = update (λ k, f k (g k)) i (f i v) j :=
begin
by_cases h : j = i,
{ subst j, simp },
{ simp [h] }
end
lemma comp_update {α' : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (f : α' → β) (g : α → α') (i : α) (v : α') :
f ∘ (update g i v) = update (f ∘ g) i (f v) :=
funext $ apply_update _ _ _ _
theorem update_comm {α} [decidable_eq α] {β : α → Sort*}
{a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (v : β a) (w : β b) (f : Πa, β a) :
update (update f a v) b w = update (update f b w) a v :=
begin
funext c, simp only [update],
by_cases h₁ : c = b; by_cases h₂ : c = a; try {simp [h₁, h₂]},
cases h (h₂.symm.trans h₁),
end
@[simp] theorem update_idem {α} [decidable_eq α] {β : α → Sort*}
{a : α} (v w : β a) (f : Πa, β a) : update (update f a v) a w = update f a w :=
by {funext b, by_cases b = a; simp [update, h]}
end update
section extend
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
variables {α β γ : Type*} {f : α → β}
/-- `extend f g e'` extends a function `g : α → γ`
along a function `f : α → β` to a function `β → γ`,
by using the values of `g` on the range of `f`
and the values of an auxiliary function `e' : β → γ` elsewhere.
Mostly useful when `f` is injective. -/
def extend (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) : β → γ :=
λ b, if h : ∃ a, f a = b then g (classical.some h) else e' b
lemma extend_def (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) (b : β) [decidable (∃ a, f a = b)] :
extend f g e' b = if h : ∃ a, f a = b then g (classical.some h) else e' b :=
by { unfold extend, congr }
@[simp] lemma extend_apply (hf : injective f) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) (a : α) :
extend f g e' (f a) = g a :=
begin
simp only [extend_def, dif_pos, exists_apply_eq_apply],
exact congr_arg g (hf $ classical.some_spec (exists_apply_eq_apply f a))
end
@[simp] lemma extend_comp (hf : injective f) (g : α → γ) (e' : β → γ) :
extend f g e' ∘ f = g :=
funext $ λ a, extend_apply hf g e' a
end extend
lemma uncurry_def {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) : uncurry f = (λp, f p.1 p.2) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma uncurry_apply_pair {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) (x : α) (y : β) :
uncurry f (x, y) = f x y :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma curry_apply {α β γ} (f : α × β → γ) (x : α) (y : β) :
curry f x y = f (x, y) :=
rfl
section bicomp
variables {α β γ δ ε : Type*}
/-- Compose a binary function `f` with a pair of unary functions `g` and `h`.
If both arguments of `f` have the same type and `g = h`, then `bicompl f g g = f on g`. -/
def bicompl (f : γ → δ → ε) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) (a b) :=
f (g a) (h b)
/-- Compose an unary function `f` with a binary function `g`. -/
def bicompr (f : γ → δ) (g : α → β → γ) (a b) :=
f (g a b)
-- Suggested local notation:
local notation f `∘₂` g := bicompr f g
lemma uncurry_bicompr (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
uncurry (g ∘₂ f) = (g ∘ uncurry f) := rfl
lemma uncurry_bicompl (f : γ → δ → ε) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) :
uncurry (bicompl f g h) = (uncurry f) ∘ (prod.map g h) :=
rfl
end bicomp
section uncurry
variables {α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- Records a way to turn an element of `α` into a function from `β` to `γ`. The most generic use
is to recursively uncurry. For instance `f : α → β → γ → δ` will be turned into
`↿f : α × β × γ → δ`. One can also add instances for bundled maps. -/
class has_uncurry (α : Type*) (β : out_param Type*) (γ : out_param Type*) := (uncurry : α → (β → γ))
/-- Uncurrying operator. The most generic use is to recursively uncurry. For instance
`f : α → β → γ → δ` will be turned into `↿f : α × β × γ → δ`. One can also add instances
for bundled maps.-/
add_decl_doc has_uncurry.uncurry
notation `↿`:max x:max := has_uncurry.uncurry x
instance has_uncurry_base : has_uncurry (α → β) α β := ⟨id⟩
instance has_uncurry_induction [has_uncurry β γ δ] : has_uncurry (α → β) (α × γ) δ :=
⟨λ f p, ↿(f p.1) p.2⟩
end uncurry
/-- A function is involutive, if `f ∘ f = id`. -/
def involutive {α} (f : α → α) : Prop := ∀ x, f (f x) = x
lemma involutive_iff_iter_2_eq_id {α} {f : α → α} : involutive f ↔ (f^[2] = id) :=
funext_iff.symm
namespace involutive
variables {α : Sort u} {f : α → α} (h : involutive f)
include h
@[simp]
lemma comp_self : f ∘ f = id := funext h
protected lemma left_inverse : left_inverse f f := h
protected lemma right_inverse : right_inverse f f := h
protected lemma injective : injective f := h.left_inverse.injective
protected lemma surjective : surjective f := λ x, ⟨f x, h x⟩
protected lemma bijective : bijective f := ⟨h.injective, h.surjective⟩
/-- Involuting an `ite` of an involuted value `x : α` negates the `Prop` condition in the `ite`. -/
protected lemma ite_not (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : α) :
f (ite P x (f x)) = ite (¬ P) x (f x) :=
by rw [apply_ite f, h, ite_not]
/-- An involution commutes across an equality. Compare to `function.injective.eq_iff`. -/
protected lemma eq_iff {x y : α} : f x = y ↔ x = f y :=
h.injective.eq_iff' (h y)
end involutive
/-- The property of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` being injective.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the corresponding function `α × β → γ` being injective.
-/
@[reducible] def injective2 {α β γ} (f : α → β → γ) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄, f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂ → a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂
namespace injective2
variables {α β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ)
protected lemma left (hf : injective2 f) ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄ (h : f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) : a₁ = a₂ :=
(hf h).1
protected lemma right (hf : injective2 f) ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄ (h : f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) : b₁ = b₂ :=
(hf h).2
lemma eq_iff (hf : injective2 f) ⦃a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂⦄ : f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ :=
⟨λ h, hf h, λ⟨h1, h2⟩, congr_arg2 f h1 h2⟩
end injective2
section sometimes
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
/-- `sometimes f` evaluates to some value of `f`, if it exists. This function is especially
interesting in the case where `α` is a proposition, in which case `f` is necessarily a
constant function, so that `sometimes f = f a` for all `a`. -/
noncomputable def sometimes {α β} [nonempty β] (f : α → β) : β :=
if h : nonempty α then f (classical.choice h) else classical.choice ‹_›
theorem sometimes_eq {p : Prop} {α} [nonempty α] (f : p → α) (a : p) : sometimes f = f a :=
dif_pos ⟨a⟩
theorem sometimes_spec {p : Prop} {α} [nonempty α]
(P : α → Prop) (f : p → α) (a : p) (h : P (f a)) : P (sometimes f) :=
by rwa sometimes_eq
end sometimes
end function
/-- `s.piecewise f g` is the function equal to `f` on the set `s`, and to `g` on its complement. -/
def set.piecewise {α : Type u} {β : α → Sort v} (s : set α) (f g : Πi, β i)
[∀j, decidable (j ∈ s)] :
Πi, β i :=
λi, if i ∈ s then f i else g i
/-! ### Bijectivity of `eq.rec`, `eq.mp`, `eq.mpr`, and `cast` -/
lemma eq_rec_on_bijective {α : Sort*} {C : α → Sort*} :
∀ {a a' : α} (h : a = a'), function.bijective (@eq.rec_on _ _ C _ h)
| _ _ rfl := ⟨λ x y, id, λ x, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
lemma eq_mp_bijective {α β : Sort*} (h : α = β) : function.bijective (eq.mp h) :=
eq_rec_on_bijective h
lemma eq_mpr_bijective {α β : Sort*} (h : α = β) : function.bijective (eq.mpr h) :=
eq_rec_on_bijective h.symm
lemma cast_bijective {α β : Sort*} (h : α = β) : function.bijective (cast h) :=
eq_rec_on_bijective h
/-! Note these lemmas apply to `Type*` not `Sort*`, as the latter interferes with `simp`, and
is trivial anyway.-/
@[simp]
lemma eq_rec_inj {α : Sort*} {a a' : α} (h : a = a') {C : α → Type*} (x y : C a) :
(eq.rec x h : C a') = eq.rec y h ↔ x = y :=
(eq_rec_on_bijective h).injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
lemma cast_inj {α β : Type*} (h : α = β) {x y : α} : cast h x = cast h y ↔ x = y :=
(cast_bijective h).injective.eq_iff
/-- A set of functions "separates points"
if for each pair of distinct points there is a function taking different values on them. -/
def set.separates_points {α β : Type*} (A : set (α → β)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y : α⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ f ∈ A, (f x : β) ≠ f y
lemma is_symm_op.flip_eq {α β} (op) [is_symm_op α β op] : flip op = op :=
funext $ λ a, funext $ λ b, (is_symm_op.symm_op a b).symm
|
f01d1e87b35e15c21aa030bb02f2372be65e91ae | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/no_meta_rec_inst.lean | 83a57b73e0441e2ddce9e647ff5f1cefed9c4fc8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 211 | lean | class has_false (α : Type) :=
(f : false)
meta def n_has_false : has_false ℕ :=
by apply_instance -- Error, the "recursive" instance (n_has_false : has_false ℕ) should not be used in type class resolution
|
51271e5dc71a69fe21969bb447e7f456f58c5307 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/logic/relation.lean | 84d1272480ef994c81e2c451aa8b42c10d5997b5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,079 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Transitive reflexive as well as reflexive closure of relations.
-/
import tactic.basic
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
section ne_imp
variable {r : α → α → Prop}
lemma is_refl.reflexive [is_refl α r] : reflexive r :=
λ x, is_refl.refl x
/-- To show a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
it suffices to show it holds when `x ≠ y`. -/
lemma reflexive.rel_of_ne_imp (h : reflexive r) {x y : α} (hr : x ≠ y → r x y) : r x y :=
begin
by_cases hxy : x = y,
{ exact hxy ▸ h x },
{ exact hr hxy }
end
/-- If a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
then it holds whether or not `x ≠ y`. -/
lemma reflexive.ne_imp_iff (h : reflexive r) {x y : α} :
(x ≠ y → r x y) ↔ r x y :=
⟨h.rel_of_ne_imp, λ hr _, hr⟩
/-- If a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
then it holds whether or not `x ≠ y`. Unlike `reflexive.ne_imp_iff`, this uses `[is_refl α r]`. -/
lemma reflexive_ne_imp_iff [is_refl α r] {x y : α} :
(x ≠ y → r x y) ↔ r x y :=
is_refl.reflexive.ne_imp_iff
end ne_imp
namespace relation
section comp
variables {r : α → β → Prop} {p : β → γ → Prop} {q : γ → δ → Prop}
/--
The composition of two relations, yielding a new relation. The result
relates a term of `α` and a term of `γ` if there is an intermediate
term of `β` related to both.
-/
def comp (r : α → β → Prop) (p : β → γ → Prop) (a : α) (c : γ) : Prop := ∃b, r a b ∧ p b c
local infixr ` ∘r ` : 80 := relation.comp
lemma comp_eq : r ∘r (=) = r :=
funext $ assume a, funext $ assume b, propext $ iff.intro
(assume ⟨c, h, eq⟩, eq ▸ h)
(assume h, ⟨b, h, rfl⟩)
lemma eq_comp : (=) ∘r r = r :=
funext $ assume a, funext $ assume b, propext $ iff.intro
(assume ⟨c, eq, h⟩, eq.symm ▸ h)
(assume h, ⟨a, rfl, h⟩)
lemma iff_comp {r : Prop → α → Prop} : (↔) ∘r r = r :=
have (↔) = (=), by funext a b; exact iff_eq_eq,
by rw [this, eq_comp]
lemma comp_iff {r : α → Prop → Prop} : r ∘r (↔) = r :=
have (↔) = (=), by funext a b; exact iff_eq_eq,
by rw [this, comp_eq]
lemma comp_assoc : (r ∘r p) ∘r q = r ∘r p ∘r q :=
begin
funext a d, apply propext,
split,
exact assume ⟨c, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, hcd⟩, ⟨b, hab, c, hbc, hcd⟩,
exact assume ⟨b, hab, c, hbc, hcd⟩, ⟨c, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, hcd⟩
end
lemma flip_comp : flip (r ∘r p) = (flip p) ∘r (flip r) :=
begin
funext c a, apply propext,
split,
exact assume ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, ⟨b, hbc, hab⟩,
exact assume ⟨b, hbc, hab⟩, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩
end
end comp
/--
The map of a relation `r` through a pair of functions pushes the
relation to the codomains of the functions. The resulting relation is
defined by having pairs of terms related if they have preimages
related by `r`.
-/
protected def map (r : α → β → Prop) (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : γ → δ → Prop :=
λc d, ∃a b, r a b ∧ f a = c ∧ g b = d
variables {r : α → α → Prop} {a b c d : α}
/-- `refl_trans_gen r`: reflexive transitive closure of `r` -/
@[mk_iff relation.refl_trans_gen.cases_tail_iff]
inductive refl_trans_gen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : refl_trans_gen a
| tail {b c} : refl_trans_gen b → r b c → refl_trans_gen c
attribute [refl] refl_trans_gen.refl
/-- `refl_gen r`: reflexive closure of `r` -/
@[mk_iff] inductive refl_gen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : refl_gen a
| single {b} : r a b → refl_gen b
/-- `trans_gen r`: transitive closure of `r` -/
@[mk_iff] inductive trans_gen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| single {b} : r a b → trans_gen b
| tail {b c} : trans_gen b → r b c → trans_gen c
attribute [refl] refl_gen.refl
lemma refl_gen.to_refl_trans_gen : ∀{a b}, refl_gen r a b → refl_trans_gen r a b
| a _ refl_gen.refl := by refl
| a b (refl_gen.single h) := refl_trans_gen.tail refl_trans_gen.refl h
namespace refl_trans_gen
@[trans]
lemma trans (hab : refl_trans_gen r a b) (hbc : refl_trans_gen r b c) : refl_trans_gen r a c :=
begin
induction hbc,
case refl_trans_gen.refl { assumption },
case refl_trans_gen.tail : c d hbc hcd hac { exact hac.tail hcd }
end
lemma single (hab : r a b) : refl_trans_gen r a b :=
refl.tail hab
lemma head (hab : r a b) (hbc : refl_trans_gen r b c) : refl_trans_gen r a c :=
begin
induction hbc,
case refl_trans_gen.refl { exact refl.tail hab },
case refl_trans_gen.tail : c d hbc hcd hac { exact hac.tail hcd }
end
lemma symmetric (h : symmetric r) : symmetric (refl_trans_gen r) :=
begin
intros x y h,
induction h with z w a b c,
{ refl },
{ apply relation.refl_trans_gen.head (h b) c }
end
lemma cases_tail : refl_trans_gen r a b → b = a ∨ (∃c, refl_trans_gen r a c ∧ r c b) :=
(cases_tail_iff r a b).1
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma head_induction_on
{P : ∀(a:α), refl_trans_gen r a b → Prop}
{a : α} (h : refl_trans_gen r a b)
(refl : P b refl)
(head : ∀{a c} (h' : r a c) (h : refl_trans_gen r c b), P c h → P a (h.head h')) :
P a h :=
begin
induction h generalizing P,
case refl_trans_gen.refl { exact refl },
case refl_trans_gen.tail : b c hab hbc ih {
apply ih,
show P b _, from head hbc _ refl,
show ∀a a', r a a' → refl_trans_gen r a' b → P a' _ → P a _,
from assume a a' hab hbc, head hab _ }
end
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma trans_induction_on
{P : ∀{a b : α}, refl_trans_gen r a b → Prop}
{a b : α} (h : refl_trans_gen r a b)
(ih₁ : ∀a, @P a a refl)
(ih₂ : ∀{a b} (h : r a b), P (single h))
(ih₃ : ∀{a b c} (h₁ : refl_trans_gen r a b) (h₂ : refl_trans_gen r b c),
P h₁ → P h₂ → P (h₁.trans h₂)) :
P h :=
begin
induction h,
case refl_trans_gen.refl { exact ih₁ a },
case refl_trans_gen.tail : b c hab hbc ih { exact ih₃ hab (single hbc) ih (ih₂ hbc) }
end
lemma cases_head (h : refl_trans_gen r a b) : a = b ∨ (∃c, r a c ∧ refl_trans_gen r c b) :=
begin
induction h using relation.refl_trans_gen.head_induction_on,
{ left, refl },
{ right, existsi _, split; assumption }
end
lemma cases_head_iff : refl_trans_gen r a b ↔ a = b ∨ (∃c, r a c ∧ refl_trans_gen r c b) :=
begin
split,
{ exact cases_head },
{ assume h,
rcases h with rfl | ⟨c, hac, hcb⟩,
{ refl },
{ exact head hac hcb } }
end
lemma total_of_right_unique (U : relator.right_unique r)
(ab : refl_trans_gen r a b) (ac : refl_trans_gen r a c) :
refl_trans_gen r b c ∨ refl_trans_gen r c b :=
begin
induction ab with b d ab bd IH,
{ exact or.inl ac },
{ rcases IH with IH | IH,
{ rcases cases_head IH with rfl | ⟨e, be, ec⟩,
{ exact or.inr (single bd) },
{ cases U.unique bd be, exact or.inl ec } },
{ exact or.inr (IH.tail bd) } }
end
end refl_trans_gen
namespace trans_gen
lemma to_refl {a b} (h : trans_gen r a b) : refl_trans_gen r a b :=
begin
induction h with b h b c _ bc ab,
exact refl_trans_gen.single h,
exact refl_trans_gen.tail ab bc
end
@[trans] lemma trans_left (hab : trans_gen r a b) (hbc : refl_trans_gen r b c) : trans_gen r a c :=
begin
induction hbc,
case refl_trans_gen.refl : { assumption },
case refl_trans_gen.tail : c d hbc hcd hac { exact hac.tail hcd }
end
@[trans] lemma trans (hab : trans_gen r a b) (hbc : trans_gen r b c) : trans_gen r a c :=
trans_left hab hbc.to_refl
lemma head' (hab : r a b) (hbc : refl_trans_gen r b c) : trans_gen r a c :=
trans_left (single hab) hbc
lemma tail' (hab : refl_trans_gen r a b) (hbc : r b c) : trans_gen r a c :=
begin
induction hab generalizing c,
case refl_trans_gen.refl : c hac { exact single hac },
case refl_trans_gen.tail : d b hab hdb IH { exact tail (IH hdb) hbc }
end
@[trans] lemma trans_right (hab : refl_trans_gen r a b) (hbc : trans_gen r b c) : trans_gen r a c :=
begin
induction hbc,
case trans_gen.single : c hbc { exact tail' hab hbc },
case trans_gen.tail : c d hbc hcd hac { exact hac.tail hcd }
end
lemma head (hab : r a b) (hbc : trans_gen r b c) : trans_gen r a c :=
head' hab hbc.to_refl
lemma tail'_iff : trans_gen r a c ↔ ∃ b, refl_trans_gen r a b ∧ r b c :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, tail' hab hbc⟩,
cases h with _ hac b _ hab hbc,
{ exact ⟨_, by refl, hac⟩ },
{ exact ⟨_, hab.to_refl, hbc⟩ }
end
lemma head'_iff : trans_gen r a c ↔ ∃ b, r a b ∧ refl_trans_gen r b c :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, head' hab hbc⟩,
induction h,
case trans_gen.single : c hac { exact ⟨_, hac, by refl⟩ },
case trans_gen.tail : b c hab hbc IH {
rcases IH with ⟨d, had, hdb⟩, exact ⟨_, had, hdb.tail hbc⟩ }
end
lemma trans_gen_eq_self (trans : transitive r) :
trans_gen r = r :=
funext $ λ a, funext $ λ b, propext $
⟨λ h, begin
induction h,
case trans_gen.single : c hc { exact hc },
case trans_gen.tail : c d hac hcd hac { exact trans hac hcd }
end,
trans_gen.single⟩
lemma transitive_trans_gen : transitive (trans_gen r) :=
assume a b c, trans
lemma trans_gen_idem :
trans_gen (trans_gen r) = trans_gen r :=
trans_gen_eq_self transitive_trans_gen
lemma trans_gen_lift {p : β → β → Prop} {a b : α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀a b, r a b → p (f a) (f b)) (hab : trans_gen r a b) : trans_gen p (f a) (f b) :=
begin
induction hab,
case trans_gen.single : c hac { exact trans_gen.single (h a c hac) },
case trans_gen.tail : c d hac hcd hac { exact trans_gen.tail hac (h c d hcd) }
end
lemma trans_gen_lift' {p : β → β → Prop} {a b : α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ a b, r a b → trans_gen p (f a) (f b))
(hab : trans_gen r a b) : trans_gen p (f a) (f b) :=
by simpa [trans_gen_idem] using trans_gen_lift f h hab
lemma trans_gen_closed {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a b, r a b → trans_gen p a b) → trans_gen r a b → trans_gen p a b :=
trans_gen_lift' id
end trans_gen
section refl_trans_gen
open refl_trans_gen
lemma refl_trans_gen_iff_eq (h : ∀b, ¬ r a b) : refl_trans_gen r a b ↔ b = a :=
by rw [cases_head_iff]; simp [h, eq_comm]
lemma refl_trans_gen_iff_eq_or_trans_gen :
refl_trans_gen r a b ↔ b = a ∨ trans_gen r a b :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ cases h with c _ hac hcb,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ exact or.inr (trans_gen.tail' hac hcb) } },
{ rcases h with rfl | h, {refl}, {exact h.to_refl} }
end
lemma refl_trans_gen_lift {p : β → β → Prop} {a b : α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀a b, r a b → p (f a) (f b)) (hab : refl_trans_gen r a b) : refl_trans_gen p (f a) (f b) :=
refl_trans_gen.trans_induction_on hab (assume a, refl)
(assume a b, refl_trans_gen.single ∘ h _ _) (assume a b c _ _, trans)
lemma refl_trans_gen_mono {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀a b, r a b → p a b) → refl_trans_gen r a b → refl_trans_gen p a b :=
refl_trans_gen_lift id
lemma refl_trans_gen_eq_self (refl : reflexive r) (trans : transitive r) :
refl_trans_gen r = r :=
funext $ λ a, funext $ λ b, propext $
⟨λ h, begin
induction h with b c h₁ h₂ IH, {apply refl},
exact trans IH h₂,
end, single⟩
lemma reflexive_refl_trans_gen : reflexive (refl_trans_gen r) :=
assume a, refl
lemma transitive_refl_trans_gen : transitive (refl_trans_gen r) :=
assume a b c, trans
lemma refl_trans_gen_idem :
refl_trans_gen (refl_trans_gen r) = refl_trans_gen r :=
refl_trans_gen_eq_self reflexive_refl_trans_gen transitive_refl_trans_gen
lemma refl_trans_gen_lift' {p : β → β → Prop} {a b : α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀a b, r a b → refl_trans_gen p (f a) (f b))
(hab : refl_trans_gen r a b) : refl_trans_gen p (f a) (f b) :=
by simpa [refl_trans_gen_idem] using refl_trans_gen_lift f h hab
lemma refl_trans_gen_closed {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a b, r a b → refl_trans_gen p a b) → refl_trans_gen r a b → refl_trans_gen p a b :=
refl_trans_gen_lift' id
end refl_trans_gen
/--
The join of a relation on a single type is a new relation for which
pairs of terms are related if there is a third term they are both
related to. For example, if `r` is a relation representing rewrites
in a term rewriting system, then *confluence* is the property that if
`a` rewrites to both `b` and `c`, then `join r` relates `b` and `c`
(see `relation.church_rosser`).
-/
def join (r : α → α → Prop) : α → α → Prop := λa b, ∃c, r a c ∧ r b c
section join
open refl_trans_gen refl_gen
lemma church_rosser
(h : ∀a b c, r a b → r a c → ∃d, refl_gen r b d ∧ refl_trans_gen r c d)
(hab : refl_trans_gen r a b) (hac : refl_trans_gen r a c) : join (refl_trans_gen r) b c :=
begin
induction hab,
case refl_trans_gen.refl { exact ⟨c, hac, refl⟩ },
case refl_trans_gen.tail : d e had hde ih {
clear hac had a,
rcases ih with ⟨b, hdb, hcb⟩,
have : ∃a, refl_trans_gen r e a ∧ refl_gen r b a,
{ clear hcb, induction hdb,
case refl_trans_gen.refl { exact ⟨e, refl, refl_gen.single hde⟩ },
case refl_trans_gen.tail : f b hdf hfb ih {
rcases ih with ⟨a, hea, hfa⟩,
cases hfa with _ hfa,
{ exact ⟨b, hea.tail hfb, refl_gen.refl⟩ },
{ rcases h _ _ _ hfb hfa with ⟨c, hbc, hac⟩,
exact ⟨c, hea.trans hac, hbc⟩ } } },
rcases this with ⟨a, hea, hba⟩, cases hba with _ hba,
{ exact ⟨b, hea, hcb⟩ },
{ exact ⟨a, hea, hcb.tail hba⟩ } }
end
lemma join_of_single (h : reflexive r) (hab : r a b) : join r a b :=
⟨b, hab, h b⟩
lemma symmetric_join : symmetric (join r) :=
assume a b ⟨c, hac, hcb⟩, ⟨c, hcb, hac⟩
lemma reflexive_join (h : reflexive r) : reflexive (join r) :=
assume a, ⟨a, h a, h a⟩
lemma transitive_join (ht : transitive r) (h : ∀a b c, r a b → r a c → join r b c) :
transitive (join r) :=
assume a b c ⟨x, hax, hbx⟩ ⟨y, hby, hcy⟩,
let ⟨z, hxz, hyz⟩ := h b x y hbx hby in
⟨z, ht hax hxz, ht hcy hyz⟩
lemma equivalence_join (hr : reflexive r) (ht : transitive r)
(h : ∀a b c, r a b → r a c → join r b c) :
equivalence (join r) :=
⟨reflexive_join hr, symmetric_join, transitive_join ht h⟩
lemma equivalence_join_refl_trans_gen
(h : ∀a b c, r a b → r a c → ∃d, refl_gen r b d ∧ refl_trans_gen r c d) :
equivalence (join (refl_trans_gen r)) :=
equivalence_join reflexive_refl_trans_gen transitive_refl_trans_gen (assume a b c, church_rosser h)
lemma join_of_equivalence {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr : equivalence r)
(h : ∀a b, r' a b → r a b) : join r' a b → r a b
| ⟨c, hac, hbc⟩ := hr.2.2 (h _ _ hac) (hr.2.1 $ h _ _ hbc)
lemma refl_trans_gen_of_transitive_reflexive {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr : reflexive r)
(ht : transitive r) (h : ∀a b, r' a b → r a b) (h' : refl_trans_gen r' a b) :
r a b :=
begin
induction h' with b c hab hbc ih,
{ exact hr _ },
{ exact ht ih (h _ _ hbc) }
end
lemma refl_trans_gen_of_equivalence {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr : equivalence r) :
(∀a b, r' a b → r a b) → refl_trans_gen r' a b → r a b :=
refl_trans_gen_of_transitive_reflexive hr.1 hr.2.2
end join
section eqv_gen
lemma eqv_gen_iff_of_equivalence (h : equivalence r) : eqv_gen r a b ↔ r a b :=
iff.intro
begin
assume h,
induction h,
case eqv_gen.rel { assumption },
case eqv_gen.refl { exact h.1 _ },
case eqv_gen.symm { apply h.2.1, assumption },
case eqv_gen.trans : a b c _ _ hab hbc { exact h.2.2 hab hbc }
end
(eqv_gen.rel a b)
lemma eqv_gen_mono {r p : α → α → Prop}
(hrp : ∀a b, r a b → p a b) (h : eqv_gen r a b) : eqv_gen p a b :=
begin
induction h,
case eqv_gen.rel : a b h { exact eqv_gen.rel _ _ (hrp _ _ h) },
case eqv_gen.refl : { exact eqv_gen.refl _ },
case eqv_gen.symm : a b h ih { exact eqv_gen.symm _ _ ih },
case eqv_gen.trans : a b c ih1 ih2 hab hbc { exact eqv_gen.trans _ _ _ hab hbc }
end
end eqv_gen
end relation
|
9a1fa0bc12d49b5dcf902a02d7bdb320db079e74 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Elab/Frontend.lean | a3ecc3639303dea3e83f2ff117a871a93211d5ca | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,668 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Elab.Import
import Init.Lean.Elab.Command
namespace Lean
namespace Elab
namespace Frontend
structure Context :=
(commandStateRef : IO.Ref Command.State)
(parserStateRef : IO.Ref Parser.ModuleParserState)
(cmdPosRef : IO.Ref String.Pos)
(inputCtx : Parser.InputContext)
abbrev FrontendM := ReaderT Context (EIO Empty)
@[inline] def liftIOCore! {α} [Inhabited α] (x : IO α) : EIO Empty α :=
EIO.catchExceptions x (fun _ => unreachable!)
@[inline] def runCommandElabM (x : Command.CommandElabM Unit) : FrontendM Unit :=
fun ctx => do
cmdPos ← liftIOCore! $ ctx.cmdPosRef.get;
let cmdCtx : Command.Context := { cmdPos := cmdPos, stateRef := ctx.commandStateRef, fileName := ctx.inputCtx.fileName, fileMap := ctx.inputCtx.fileMap };
EIO.catchExceptions (x cmdCtx) (fun _ => pure ())
def elabCommandAtFrontend (stx : Syntax) : FrontendM Unit :=
runCommandElabM (Command.withLogging $ Command.elabCommand stx)
def updateCmdPos : FrontendM Unit :=
fun ctx => do
parserState ← liftIOCore! $ ctx.parserStateRef.get;
liftIOCore! $ ctx.cmdPosRef.set parserState.pos
def getParserState : FrontendM Parser.ModuleParserState :=
fun ctx => liftIOCore! $ ctx.parserStateRef.get
def getCommandState : FrontendM Command.State :=
fun ctx => liftIOCore! $ ctx.commandStateRef.get
def setParserState (ps : Parser.ModuleParserState) : FrontendM Unit :=
fun ctx => liftIOCore! $ ctx.parserStateRef.set ps
def setMessages (msgs : MessageLog) : FrontendM Unit :=
fun ctx => liftIOCore! $ ctx.commandStateRef.modify $ fun s => { messages := msgs, .. s }
def getInputContext : FrontendM Parser.InputContext := do
ctx ← read; pure ctx.inputCtx
def processCommand : FrontendM Bool := do
updateCmdPos;
cmdState ← getCommandState;
parserState ← getParserState;
inputCtx ← getInputContext;
match Parser.parseCommand cmdState.env inputCtx parserState cmdState.messages with
| (cmd, ps, messages) => do
setParserState ps;
setMessages messages;
if Parser.isEOI cmd || Parser.isExitCommand cmd then do
pure true -- Done
else do
elabCommandAtFrontend cmd;
pure false
partial def processCommandsAux : Unit → FrontendM Unit
| () => do
done ← processCommand;
if done then pure ()
else processCommandsAux ()
def processCommands : FrontendM Unit :=
processCommandsAux ()
end Frontend
open Frontend
def IO.processCommands (inputCtx : Parser.InputContext) (parserStateRef : IO.Ref Parser.ModuleParserState) (cmdStateRef : IO.Ref Command.State) : IO Unit := do
ps ← parserStateRef.get;
cmdPosRef ← IO.mkRef ps.pos;
EIO.adaptExcept (fun (ex : Empty) => Empty.rec _ ex) $
processCommands { commandStateRef := cmdStateRef, parserStateRef := parserStateRef, cmdPosRef := cmdPosRef, inputCtx := inputCtx }
def process (input : String) (env : Environment) (opts : Options) (fileName : Option String := none) : IO (Environment × MessageLog) := do
let fileName := fileName.getD "<input>";
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext input fileName;
parserStateRef ← IO.mkRef { Parser.ModuleParserState . };
cmdStateRef ← IO.mkRef $ Command.mkState env {} opts;
IO.processCommands inputCtx parserStateRef cmdStateRef;
cmdState ← cmdStateRef.get;
pure (cmdState.env, cmdState.messages)
@[export lean_process_input]
def processExport (env : Environment) (input : String) (opts : Options) (fileName : String) : IO (Environment × List Message) := do
(env, messages) ← process input env opts fileName;
pure (env, messages.toList)
def runFrontend (env : Environment) (input : String) (opts : Options := {}) (fileName : Option String := none) : IO (Environment × MessageLog) := do
let fileName := fileName.getD "<input>";
let inputCtx := Parser.mkInputContext input fileName;
match Parser.parseHeader env inputCtx with
| (header, parserState, messages) => do
(env, messages) ← processHeader header messages inputCtx;
parserStateRef ← IO.mkRef parserState;
cmdStateRef ← IO.mkRef $ Command.mkState env messages opts;
IO.processCommands inputCtx parserStateRef cmdStateRef;
cmdState ← cmdStateRef.get;
pure (cmdState.env, cmdState.messages)
@[export lean_run_frontend]
def runFrontentExport (env : Environment) (input : String) (fileName : String) (opts : Options) : IO (Option Environment) := do
(env, messages) ← runFrontend env input opts (some fileName);
messages.forM $ fun msg => IO.println msg;
if messages.hasErrors then
pure none
else
pure (some env)
end Elab
end Lean
|
edb1ac5e469a7dda49b9ad3027c33f25fd6d3270 | 94637389e03c919023691dcd05bd4411b1034aa5 | /src/inClassNotes/type_library/nat_test.lean | f632f7f472acdb19e88aff002b8842329139f523 | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/complogic-s21 | 7c4eef2105abad899e46502270d9829d913e8afc | 99039501b770248c8ceb39890be5dfe129dc1082 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,985,669,944 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 1,621,126,241,000 | 335,706,272 | 0 | 38 | null | 1,618,325,669,000 | 1,612,374,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,917 | lean | import .nat
namespace hidden
/-
Finally, nat: a properly inductive
type, where larger values of this
type are constructed using smaller
values *of the same type*.
-/
def n0 := nat.zero
def n1 :=
nat.succ
_
def n2 :=
nat.succ
_
variable n : nat -- assume (n : nat)
#check nat.succ n -- succ is also nat
/-
To fully understand how this
definition produces a set of
terms that we can view interpret
as representing natural numbers,
you need a few additional facts:
(1) Constructors are *disjoint*. This
means that terms built using different
constructors are never equal. So zero
is not equal to any successor of zero.
(2) Constructors are *injective*. This
means applying a constructor different
argument values always yields different
results. It's especially useful in many
cases to think of this rule backwards:
(n : ℕ) (m : ℕ) (h: succ n = succ m)
-------------------------------------
(n = m)
Injective means that different values
are sent to different places. So if
succ is injective and it sends both
n and m to the same value, then n and
m must have the same value. So now, for
example, we can't have succ 5 = zero
(which would be the case for ℕ mod 5.)
(3) The values of a type include *all*
values obtainable by any *finite* number
of applications of its constructors. In
other words, a type is "closed" under
finite applications of its constructors.
So (succ n) is a nat for *any* n.
(4) A type defines the *smallest* set
of values closed under applications of
its constructors. There are not values
in a type that "creep in" wihtout being
constructed by some finite number of
applications of available constructors.
What this means is that if we're given
*any* value of a type, it *must* have
been constructed using some constructor.
applied to some arguments, and we can
recover those specific arguments. This
fact allows us to know that when we do
case analysis by constructor, we are
sure to match *any* value of any type.
-/
/-
The key to writing functions that take nat
arguments is, as usual, case analysis. If
we're given a natural number (term of type
ℕ), n, we first determine which constructor
was used to create it (zero or succ), and if
it was succ, then what one-smaller nat value
succ was applied to to produce our argument.
-/
/-
Zero. Zero is the smallest natural number.
It is implemented by the zero constructor.
-/
#eval nat.zero
/-
Successor. The successor function takes a
nat and yields a one-bigger nat. It is
implemented by the succ constructor. This
constructor takes a term of type nat as
an argument and constructs/returns a new
term with one additional "succ" at its
front.
-/
#eval nat.succ nat.zero
#eval nat.succ
_
#eval nat.succ
(nat.succ
(nat.succ
_
)
)
/-
Inductive data type definitions define
this kind of "tree-structured" data. In
this case each "node" is either "zero" or
"succ" and another "node"
zero
succ
|
zero
succ
|
succ
|
... any finite number of times
|
zero
-/
/-
We've now see how nat is defined.
We close the hidden name space and
just use Lean's nats from now on.
The benefit is that we get additional
Lean notations.
-/
-- Compare this with what follows.
#reduce nat.succ (nat.succ nat.zero)
end hidden
/-
NOTATION (concrete syntax)
-/
#eval nat.succ (nat.succ nat.zero) -- yay
#check 2
variable (n : nat)
/-
The notation 2 *could* have been defined
to mean (2 : nat), (2 : ℚ), (2 : ℝ), or
(2 : ℂ), or even something else, but in Lean
it's *hardwired* to mean (2 : ℕ) by default.
If you want a 2 of type rational, real, or
complex, for example, you have to say so
explicitly, and you have to have imported
the necessary math library. We skip that
for now.
-/
/-
FUNCTIONS
-/
def is0 : ℕ → bool
| nat.zero := tt
| _ := ff
def inc (n : ℕ) := nat.succ n
def pred' : nat → nat
| nat.zero := nat.zero
| (nat.succ n') := n'
#eval pred' 0
#eval pred' 1
#eval pred' 5
-- equivalent
def pred : nat → nat
| nat.zero := nat.zero
| (n' + 1) := n'
-- this notation won't work
def pred'' : nat → nat
| nat.zero := nat.zero
| 1 + n := n'
-- subtle difference in notations here
#reduce n + 1 -- succ n
#reduce 1 + n -- nat.add 1 n
#reduce n + 2
#reduce 2 + n
-- can only match constructor expressions
/-
Because larger values of type nat are
constructed from smaller values of the
same type, many functions that consume
a nat argument will work by applying
themselves recursively to smaller values
of the same type.
-/
def double : ℕ → ℕ
| nat.zero := 0 -- 0 is nat.zero
| (nat.succ n') := double n' + 2
def div2 : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| 1 := 0
| (n' + 2) := div2 n' + 1
#eval div2 5
-- Exercise: define mod2
def fac : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 1
| (n' + 1) := (n' + 1) * fac n'
def fib : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 1
| 1 := 1
| (n' + 2) := fib (n' + 1) + fib n'
#eval fib 5
/-
Exercise: On a piece of paper, draw
the computation tree for fib 5.
fib 5
/ \
fib 4 fib 3
/ \ /\ ...
fib 3 fib 2
/ \ /\ ...
fib 2 fib 1
/ \ /\ ...
fib 1 fib 0
| |
1 1
-/
/-
Addition:
0 + m = m
(n' + 1) + m = (n' + m) + 1
Be sure you understand that!
-/
def add : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| 0 m := m
| (n' + 1) m := (add n' m) + 1
/-
EXERCISE: write a mathematical
definition of multiplication of
n by m, then implement it, using
your add function if/as necessary
to carry out addition.
-/
/-
EXERCISE: write a mathematical
definition of exponentiation and
implement it, using your definition
of multiplication if/as necessary.
-/
/-
Addition is iterated increment.
Multiplication is iterated addition.
Exponentiation is iterated multiplication.
What function is iterated exponentiation?
Exercise: implement it.
-/ |
560bb9abd186edcd661cfb40b8e89cfe30ab7ad4 | dc253be9829b840f15d96d986e0c13520b085033 | /property.hlean | 3477e2c607c32d2af624cd71cb02787dcc6a725e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | cmu-phil/Spectral | 4ce68e5c1ef2a812ffda5260e9f09f41b85ae0ea | 3b078f5f1de251637decf04bd3fc8aa01930a6b3 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,119,195,535 | 1,684,169,772,000 | 1,684,169,772,000 | 46,450,197 | 42 | 13 | null | 1,505,516,767,000 | 1,447,883,921,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,528 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import types.trunc .logic .move_to_lib
open funext eq trunc is_trunc logic
definition property (X : Type) := X → Prop
namespace property
variable {X : Type}
/- membership and subproperty -/
definition mem (x : X) (a : property X) := a x
infix ∈ := mem
notation a ∉ b := ¬ mem a b
theorem ext {X : Type} {a b : property X} (H : ∀x, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b) : a = b :=
eq_of_homotopy (take x, Prop_eq (H x))
definition subproperty (a b : property X) : Prop := Prop.mk (∀⦃x⦄, x ∈ a → x ∈ b) _
infix ⊆ := subproperty
definition superproperty (s t : property X) : Prop := t ⊆ s
infix ⊇ := superproperty
theorem subproperty.refl (a : property X) : a ⊆ a := take x, assume H, H
theorem subproperty.trans {a b c : property X} (subab : a ⊆ b) (subbc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c :=
take x, assume ax, subbc (subab ax)
theorem subproperty.antisymm {X : Type} {a b : property X} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
ext (λ x, iff.intro (λ ina, h₁ ina) (λ inb, h₂ inb))
-- an alterantive name
/-
theorem eq_of_subproperty_of_subproperty {a b : property X} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
subproperty.antisymm h₁ h₂
-/
theorem exteq_of_subproperty_of_subproperty {a b : property X} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b :=
λ x, iff.intro (λ h, h₁ h) (λ h, h₂ h)
theorem mem_of_subproperty_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : property X} {a : X} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
assume h₁ h₂, h₁ _ h₂
/- empty property -/
definition empty : property X := λx, false
notation `∅` := property.empty
theorem not_mem_empty (x : X) : ¬ (x ∈ ∅) :=
assume H : x ∈ ∅, false.elim H
theorem mem_empty_eq (x : X) : x ∈ ∅ = false := rfl
/-
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : property X} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume xs, absurd xs (H x))
(assume xe, absurd xe (not_mem_empty x)))
-/
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {s : property X} {x : X} (H : x ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ :=
begin intro Hs, rewrite Hs at H, apply not_mem_empty x H end
theorem empty_subproperty (s : property X) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
take x, assume H, false.elim H
/-theorem eq_empty_of_subproperty_empty {s : property X} (H : s ⊆ ∅) : s = ∅ :=
subproperty.antisymm H (empty_subproperty s)
theorem subproperty_empty_iff (s : property X) : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
iff.intro eq_empty_of_subproperty_empty (take xeq, by rewrite xeq; apply subproperty.refl ∅)
-/
/- universal property -/
definition univ : property X := λx, true
theorem mem_univ (x : X) : x ∈ univ := trivial
theorem mem_univ_eq (x : X) : x ∈ univ = true := rfl
theorem empty_ne_univ [h : inhabited X] : (empty : property X) ≠ univ :=
assume H : empty = univ,
absurd (mem_univ (inhabited.value h)) (eq.rec_on H (not_mem_empty (arbitrary X)))
theorem subproperty_univ (s : property X) : s ⊆ univ := λ x H, trivial
/-
theorem eq_univ_of_univ_subproperty {s : property X} (H : univ ⊆ s) : s = univ :=
eq_of_subproperty_of_subproperty (subproperty_univ s) H
-/
/-
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : property X} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s) : s = univ :=
ext (take x, iff.intro (assume H', trivial) (assume H', H x))
-/
/- union -/
definition union (a b : property X) : property X := λx, x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b
notation a ∪ b := union a b
theorem mem_union_left {x : X} {a : property X} (b : property X) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inl h
theorem mem_union_right {x : X} {b : property X} (a : property X) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem mem_unionl {x : X} {a b : property X} : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inl h
theorem mem_unionr {x : X} {a b : property X} : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : X} {a b : property X} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := H
theorem mem_union.elim {x : X} {a b : property X} {P : Prop}
(H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P) (H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem mem_union_iff (x : X) (a b : property X) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := !iff.refl
theorem mem_union_eq (x : X) (a b : property X) : x ∈ a ∪ b = (x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b) := rfl
--theorem union_self (a : property X) : a ∪ a = a :=
--ext (take x, !or_self)
--theorem union_empty (a : property X) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
--ext (take x, !or_false)
--theorem empty_union (a : property X) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
--ext (take x, !false_or)
--theorem union_comm (a b : property X) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
--ext (take x, or.comm)
--theorem union_assoc (a b c : property X) : (a ∪ b) ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
--ext (take x, or.assoc)
--theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : property X) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
--!left_comm union_comm union_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
--theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : property X) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
--!right_comm union_comm union_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
theorem subproperty_union_left (s t : property X) : s ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x H, or.inl H
theorem subproperty_union_right (s t : property X) : t ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x H, or.inr H
theorem union_subproperty {s t r : property X} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r :=
λ x xst, or.elim xst (λ xs, sr xs) (λ xt, tr xt)
/- intersection -/
definition inter (a b : property X) : property X := λx, x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b
notation a ∩ b := inter a b
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : X) (a b : property X) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b := !iff.refl
theorem mem_inter_eq (x : X) (a b : property X) : x ∈ a ∩ b = (x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b) := rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : X} {a b : property X} (Ha : x ∈ a) (Hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
and.intro Ha Hb
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : X} {a b : property X} (H : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
and.left H
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : X} {a b : property X} (H : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
and.right H
--theorem inter_self (a : property X) : a ∩ a = a :=
--ext (take x, !and_self)
--theorem inter_empty (a : property X) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
--ext (take x, !and_false)
--theorem empty_inter (a : property X) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
--ext (take x, !false_and)
--theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_right {T : Type} {s t : property T} (H : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : t ≠ ∅ :=
--suppose t = ∅,
--have s ∩ t = ∅, by rewrite this; apply inter_empty,
--H this
--theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_left {T : Type} {s t : property T} (H : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : s ≠ ∅ :=
--suppose s = ∅,
--have s ∩ t = ∅, by rewrite this; apply empty_inter,
--H this
--theorem inter_comm (a b : property X) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
--ext (take x, !and.comm)
--theorem inter_assoc (a b c : property X) : (a ∩ b) ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
--ext (take x, !and.assoc)
--theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : property X) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
--!left_comm inter_comm inter_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
--theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : property X) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
--!right_comm inter_comm inter_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
--theorem inter_univ (a : property X) : a ∩ univ = a :=
--ext (take x, !and_true)
--theorem univ_inter (a : property X) : univ ∩ a = a :=
--ext (take x, !true_and)
theorem inter_subproperty_left (s t : property X) : s ∩ t ⊆ s := λ x H, and.left H
theorem inter_subproperty_right (s t : property X) : s ∩ t ⊆ t := λ x H, and.right H
theorem inter_subproperty_inter_right {s t : property X} (u : property X) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
take x, assume xsu, and.intro (H (and.left xsu)) (and.right xsu)
theorem inter_subproperty_inter_left {s t : property X} (u : property X) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
take x, assume xus, and.intro (and.left xus) (H (and.right xus))
theorem subproperty_inter {s t r : property X} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t :=
λ x xr, and.intro (rs xr) (rt xr)
--theorem not_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem_inter_left {s t : property X} {x : X} (Hxs : x ∈ s) (Hnm : x ∉ s ∩ t) : x ∉ t :=
-- suppose x ∈ t,
-- have x ∈ s ∩ t, from and.intro Hxs this,
-- show false, from Hnm this
--theorem not_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem_inter_right {s t : property X} {x : X} (Hxs : x ∈ t) (Hnm : x ∉ s ∩ t) : x ∉ s :=
-- suppose x ∈ s,
-- have x ∈ s ∩ t, from and.intro this Hxs,
-- show false, from Hnm this
/- distributivity laws -/
--theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : property X) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
--ext (take x, !and.left_distrib)
--theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : property X) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
--ext (take x, !and.right_distrib)
--theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : property X) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
--ext (take x, !or.left_distrib)
--theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : property X) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
--ext (take x, !or.right_distrib)
/- property-builder notation -/
-- {x : X | P}
definition property_of (P : X → Prop) : property X := P
notation `{` binder ` | ` r:(scoped:1 P, property_of P) `}` := r
theorem mem_property_of {P : X → Prop} {a : X} (h : P a) : a ∈ {x | P x} := h
theorem of_mem_property_of {P : X → Prop} {a : X} (h : a ∈ {x | P x}) : P a := h
-- {x ∈ s | P}
definition sep (P : X → Prop) (s : property X) : property X := λx, x ∈ s ∧ P x
notation `{` binder ` ∈ ` s ` | ` r:(scoped:1 p, sep p s) `}` := r
/- insert -/
definition insert (x : X) (a : property X) : property X := {y : X | y = x ∨ y ∈ a}
abbreviation insert_same_level.{u} := @insert.{u u}
-- '{x, y, z}
notation `'{`:max a:(foldr `, ` (x b, insert_same_level x b) ∅) `}`:0 := a
theorem subproperty_insert (x : X) (a : property X) : a ⊆ insert x a :=
take y, assume ys, or.inr ys
theorem mem_insert (x : X) (s : property X) : x ∈ insert x s :=
or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : X} {s : property X} (y : X) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : X} {s : property X} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
assume h, h
/- singleton -/
open trunc_index
theorem mem_singleton_iff {X : Type} [is_set X] (a b : X) : a ∈ '{b} ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro
(assume ainb, or.elim ainb (λ aeqb, aeqb) (λ f, false.elim f))
(assume aeqb, or.inl aeqb)
theorem mem_singleton (a : X) : a ∈ '{a} := !mem_insert
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {X : Type} [is_set X] {x y : X} (h : x ∈ '{y}) : x = y :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert h)
(suppose x = y, this)
(suppose x ∈ ∅, absurd this (not_mem_empty x))
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : X} (H : x = y) : x ∈ '{y} :=
eq.symm H ▸ mem_singleton y
/-
theorem insert_eq (x : X) (s : property X) : insert x s = '{x} ∪ s :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(suppose y ∈ insert x s,
or.elim this (suppose y = x, or.inl (or.inl this)) (suppose y ∈ s, or.inr this))
(suppose y ∈ '{x} ∪ s,
or.elim this
(suppose y ∈ '{x}, or.inl (eq_of_mem_singleton this))
(suppose y ∈ s, or.inr this)))
-/
/-
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : X) : '{a, a} = '{a} :=
by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem !mem_singleton]
-/
/-
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : X) : '{a} ≠ ∅ :=
begin
intro H,
apply not_mem_empty a,
rewrite -H,
apply mem_insert
end
-/
end property
|
a3babb86283e67293d08c6d0284bc775717bbaa4 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/data/option/defs.lean | aa9c57fbc61527dd7e7ee8d917ed8695883e6f32 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,793 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
Extra definitions on option.
-/
namespace option
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
attribute [inline] option.is_some option.is_none
/-- An elimination principle for `option`. It is a nondependent version of `option.rec_on`. -/
@[simp] protected def elim : option α → β → (α → β) → β
| (some x) y f := f x
| none y f := y
instance has_mem : has_mem α (option α) := ⟨λ a b, b = some a⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_def {a : α} {b : option α} : a ∈ b ↔ b = some a :=
iff.rfl
theorem is_none_iff_eq_none {o : option α} : o.is_none = tt ↔ o = none :=
⟨option.eq_none_of_is_none, λ e, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : some a = some b ↔ a = b := by simp
/--
`o = none` is decidable even if the wrapped type does not have decidable equality.
This is not an instance because it is not definitionally equal to `option.decidable_eq`.
Try to use `o.is_none` or `o.is_some` instead.
-/
@[inline]
def decidable_eq_none {o : option α} : decidable (o = none) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (bool.decidable_eq _ _) is_none_iff_eq_none
instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
∀ o : option α, decidable (∀ a ∈ o, p a)
| none := is_true (by simp)
| (some a) := if h : p a
then is_true $ λ o e, some_inj.1 e ▸ h
else is_false $ mt (λ H, H _ rfl) h
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
∀ o : option α, decidable (∃ a ∈ o, p a)
| none := is_false (λ ⟨a, ⟨h, _⟩⟩, by cases h)
| (some a) := if h : p a
then is_true $ ⟨_, rfl, h⟩
else is_false $ λ ⟨_, ⟨rfl, hn⟩⟩, h hn
/-- inhabited `get` function. Returns `a` if the input is `some a`,
otherwise returns `default`. -/
@[reducible] def iget [inhabited α] : option α → α
| (some x) := x
| none := default α
@[simp] theorem iget_some [inhabited α] {a : α} : (some a).iget = a := rfl
/-- `guard p a` returns `some a` if `p a` holds, otherwise `none`. -/
def guard (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (a : α) : option α :=
if p a then some a else none
/-- `filter p o` returns `some a` if `o` is `some a`
and `p a` holds, otherwise `none`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (o : option α) : option α :=
o.bind (guard p)
def to_list : option α → list α
| none := []
| (some a) := [a]
@[simp] theorem mem_to_list {a : α} {o : option α} : a ∈ to_list o ↔ a ∈ o :=
by cases o; simp [to_list, eq_comm]
def lift_or_get (f : α → α → α) : option α → option α → option α
| none none := none
| (some a) none := some a -- get a
| none (some b) := some b -- get b
| (some a) (some b) := some (f a b) -- lift f
instance lift_or_get_comm (f : α → α → α) [h : is_commutative α f] :
is_commutative (option α) (lift_or_get f) :=
⟨λ a b, by cases a; cases b; simp [lift_or_get, h.comm]⟩
instance lift_or_get_assoc (f : α → α → α) [h : is_associative α f] :
is_associative (option α) (lift_or_get f) :=
⟨λ a b c, by cases a; cases b; cases c; simp [lift_or_get, h.assoc]⟩
instance lift_or_get_idem (f : α → α → α) [h : is_idempotent α f] :
is_idempotent (option α) (lift_or_get f) :=
⟨λ a, by cases a; simp [lift_or_get, h.idempotent]⟩
instance lift_or_get_is_left_id (f : α → α → α) :
is_left_id (option α) (lift_or_get f) none :=
⟨λ a, by cases a; simp [lift_or_get]⟩
instance lift_or_get_is_right_id (f : α → α → α) :
is_right_id (option α) (lift_or_get f) none :=
⟨λ a, by cases a; simp [lift_or_get]⟩
inductive rel (r : α → β → Prop) : option α → option β → Prop
| some {a b} : r a b → rel (some a) (some b)
| none : rel none none
/-- Partial bind. If for some `x : option α`, `f : Π (a : α), a ∈ x → option β` is a
partial function defined on `a : α` giving an `option β`, where `some a = x`,
then `pbind x f h` is essentially the same as `bind x f`
but is defined only when all `x = some a`, using the proof to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pbind : Π (x : option α), (Π (a : α), a ∈ x → option β) → option β
| none _ := none
| (some a) f := f a rfl
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f x h` is essentially the same as `map f x`
but is defined only when all members of `x` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π (a : α), p a → β) :
Π x : option α, (∀ a ∈ x, p a) → option β
| none _ := none
| (some a) H := some (f a (H a (mem_def.mpr rfl)))
/--
Flatten an `option` of `option`, a specialization of `mjoin`.
-/
@[simp] def join : option (option α) → option α :=
λ x, bind x id
protected def {u v} traverse {F : Type u → Type v} [applicative F] {α β : Type*} (f : α → F β) :
option α → F (option β)
| none := pure none
| (some x) := some <$> f x
/- By analogy with `monad.sequence` in `init/category/combinators.lean`. -/
/-- If you maybe have a monadic computation in a `[monad m]` which produces a term of type `α`, then
there is a naturally associated way to always perform a computation in `m` which maybe produces a
result. -/
def {u v} maybe {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m] {α : Type u} : option (m α) → m (option α)
| none := return none
| (some fn) := some <$> fn
/-- Map a monadic function `f : α → m β` over an `o : option α`, maybe producing a result. -/
def {u v w} mmap {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β)
(o : option α) : m (option β) := (o.map f).maybe
end option
|
094afcb6fdc4ff15aaa51b142c4a1cf91b152235 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/logic/equiv/list.lean | 523c5832cb68dc6cdeca75432488d1ee37baf46b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,615 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.finset.sort
import logic.denumerable
/-!
# Equivalences involving `list`-like types
This file defines some additional constructive equivalences using `encodable` and the pairing
function on `ℕ`.
-/
open nat list
namespace encodable
variables {α : Type*}
section list
variable [encodable α]
/-- Explicit encoding function for `list α` -/
def encode_list : list α → ℕ
| [] := 0
| (a::l) := succ (mkpair (encode a) (encode_list l))
/-- Explicit decoding function for `list α` -/
def decode_list : ℕ → option (list α)
| 0 := some []
| (succ v) := match unpair v, unpair_right_le v with
| (v₁, v₂), h :=
have v₂ < succ v, from lt_succ_of_le h,
(::) <$> decode α v₁ <*> decode_list v₂
end
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `list α`. This uses the `mkpair` and `unpair` functions from
`data.nat.pairing`. -/
instance _root_.list.encodable : encodable (list α) :=
⟨encode_list, decode_list, λ l,
by induction l with a l IH; simp [encode_list, decode_list, unpair_mkpair, encodek, *]⟩
@[simp] theorem encode_list_nil : encode (@nil α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem encode_list_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
encode (a :: l) = succ (mkpair (encode a) (encode l)) := rfl
@[simp] theorem decode_list_zero : decode (list α) 0 = some [] :=
show decode_list 0 = some [], by rw decode_list
@[simp] theorem decode_list_succ (v : ℕ) :
decode (list α) (succ v) =
(::) <$> decode α v.unpair.1 <*> decode (list α) v.unpair.2 :=
show decode_list (succ v) = _, begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
simp [decode_list, e], refl
end
theorem length_le_encode : ∀ (l : list α), length l ≤ encode l
| [] := _root_.zero_le _
| (a :: l) := succ_le_succ $ (length_le_encode l).trans (right_le_mkpair _ _)
end list
section finset
variables [encodable α]
private def enle : α → α → Prop := encode ⁻¹'o (≤)
private lemma enle.is_linear_order : is_linear_order α enle :=
(rel_embedding.preimage ⟨encode, encode_injective⟩ (≤)).is_linear_order
private def decidable_enle (a b : α) : decidable (enle a b) :=
by unfold enle order.preimage; apply_instance
local attribute [instance] enle.is_linear_order decidable_enle
/-- Explicit encoding function for `multiset α` -/
def encode_multiset (s : multiset α) : ℕ :=
encode (s.sort enle)
/-- Explicit decoding function for `multiset α` -/
def decode_multiset (n : ℕ) : option (multiset α) :=
coe <$> decode (list α) n
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `multiset α`. -/
instance _root_.multiset.encodable : encodable (multiset α) :=
⟨encode_multiset, decode_multiset,
λ s, by simp [encode_multiset, decode_multiset, encodek]⟩
end finset
/-- A listable type with decidable equality is encodable. -/
def encodable_of_list [decidable_eq α] (l : list α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ l) : encodable α :=
⟨λ a, index_of a l, l.nth, λ a, index_of_nth (H _)⟩
/-- A finite type is encodable. Because the encoding is not unique, we wrap it in `trunc` to
preserve computability. -/
def _root_.fintype.trunc_encodable (α : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] : trunc (encodable α) :=
@@quot.rec_on_subsingleton _
(λ s : multiset α, (∀ x:α, x ∈ s) → trunc (encodable α)) _
finset.univ.1
(λ l H, trunc.mk $ encodable_of_list l H)
finset.mem_univ
/-- A noncomputable way to arbitrarily choose an ordering on a finite type.
It is not made into a global instance, since it involves an arbitrary choice.
This can be locally made into an instance with `local attribute [instance] fintype.to_encodable`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.fintype.to_encodable (α : Type*) [fintype α] : encodable α :=
by { classical, exact (fintype.trunc_encodable α).out }
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `vector α n`. -/
instance _root_.vector.encodable [encodable α] {n} : encodable (vector α n) := subtype.encodable
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `fin n → α`. -/
instance fin_arrow [encodable α] {n} : encodable (fin n → α) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.vector_equiv_fin _ _).symm
instance fin_pi (n) (π : fin n → Type*) [∀ i, encodable (π i)] : encodable (Π i, π i) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma (fin n) π)
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `array n α`. -/
instance _root_.array.encodable [encodable α] {n} : encodable (array n α) :=
of_equiv _ (equiv.array_equiv_fin _ _)
/-- If `α` is encodable, then so is `finset α`. -/
instance _root_.finset.encodable [encodable α] : encodable (finset α) :=
by haveI := decidable_eq_of_encodable α; exact
of_equiv {s : multiset α // s.nodup}
⟨λ ⟨a, b⟩, ⟨a, b⟩, λ ⟨a, b⟩, ⟨a, b⟩, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl, λ ⟨a, b⟩, rfl⟩
-- TODO: Unify with `fintype_pi` and find a better name
/-- When `α` is finite and `β` is encodable, `α → β` is encodable too. Because the encoding is not
unique, we wrap it in `trunc` to preserve computability. -/
def fintype_arrow (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] [encodable β] :
trunc (encodable (α → β)) :=
(fintype.trunc_equiv_fin α).map $
λ f, encodable.of_equiv (fin (fintype.card α) → β) $
equiv.arrow_congr f (equiv.refl _)
/-- When `α` is finite and all `π a` are encodable, `Π a, π a` is encodable too. Because the
encoding is not unique, we wrap it in `trunc` to preserve computability. -/
def fintype_pi (α : Type*) (π : α → Type*) [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] [∀ a, encodable (π a)] :
trunc (encodable (Π a, π a)) :=
(fintype.trunc_encodable α).bind $ λ a,
(@fintype_arrow α (Σa, π a) _ _ (@sigma.encodable _ _ a _)).bind $ λ f,
trunc.mk $ @encodable.of_equiv _ _ (@subtype.encodable _ _ f _) (equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma α π)
/-- The elements of a `fintype` as a sorted list. -/
def sorted_univ (α) [fintype α] [encodable α] : list α :=
finset.univ.sort (encodable.encode' α ⁻¹'o (≤))
@[simp] theorem mem_sorted_univ {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] (x : α) : x ∈ sorted_univ α :=
(finset.mem_sort _).2 (finset.mem_univ _)
@[simp] theorem length_sorted_univ (α) [fintype α] [encodable α] :
(sorted_univ α).length = fintype.card α :=
finset.length_sort _
@[simp] theorem sorted_univ_nodup (α) [fintype α] [encodable α] : (sorted_univ α).nodup :=
finset.sort_nodup _ _
@[simp] theorem sorted_univ_to_finset (α) [fintype α] [encodable α] [decidable_eq α] :
(sorted_univ α).to_finset = finset.univ :=
finset.sort_to_finset _ _
/-- An encodable `fintype` is equivalent to the same size `fin`. -/
def fintype_equiv_fin {α} [fintype α] [encodable α] :
α ≃ fin (fintype.card α) :=
begin
haveI : decidable_eq α := encodable.decidable_eq_of_encodable _,
transitivity,
{ exact ((sorted_univ_nodup α).nth_le_equiv_of_forall_mem_list _ mem_sorted_univ).symm },
exact equiv.cast (congr_arg _ (length_sorted_univ α))
end
/-- If `α` and `β` are encodable and `α` is a fintype, then `α → β` is encodable as well. -/
instance fintype_arrow_of_encodable {α β : Type*} [encodable α] [fintype α] [encodable β] :
encodable (α → β) :=
of_equiv (fin (fintype.card α) → β) $ equiv.arrow_congr fintype_equiv_fin (equiv.refl _)
end encodable
namespace denumerable
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [denumerable α] [denumerable β]
open encodable
section list
theorem denumerable_list_aux : ∀ n : ℕ,
∃ a ∈ @decode_list α _ n, encode_list a = n
| 0 := by rw decode_list; exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
| (succ v) := begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
have h := unpair_right_le v,
rw e at h,
rcases have v₂ < succ v, from lt_succ_of_le h,
denumerable_list_aux v₂ with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩,
rw option.mem_def at h₁,
use of_nat α v₁ :: a,
simp [decode_list, e, h₂, h₁, encode_list, mkpair_unpair' e],
end
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then so is `list α`. -/
instance denumerable_list : denumerable (list α) := ⟨denumerable_list_aux⟩
@[simp] theorem list_of_nat_zero : of_nat (list α) 0 = [] :=
by rw [← @encode_list_nil α, of_nat_encode]
@[simp] theorem list_of_nat_succ (v : ℕ) :
of_nat (list α) (succ v) =
of_nat α v.unpair.1 :: of_nat (list α) v.unpair.2 :=
of_nat_of_decode $ show decode_list (succ v) = _,
begin
cases e : unpair v with v₁ v₂,
simp [decode_list, e],
rw [show decode_list v₂ = decode (list α) v₂,
from rfl, decode_eq_of_nat]; refl
end
end list
section multiset
/-- Outputs the list of differences of the input list, that is
`lower [a₁, a₂, ...] n = [a₁ - n, a₂ - a₁, ...]` -/
def lower : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m - n) :: lower l m
/-- Outputs the list of partial sums of the input list, that is
`raise [a₁, a₂, ...] n = [n + a₁, n + a₁ + a₂, ...]` -/
def raise : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m + n) :: raise l (m + n)
lemma lower_raise : ∀ l n, lower (raise l n) n = l
| [] n := rfl
| (m :: l) n := by rw [raise, lower, add_tsub_cancel_right, lower_raise]
lemma raise_lower : ∀ {l n}, list.sorted (≤) (n :: l) → raise (lower l n) n = l
| [] n h := rfl
| (m :: l) n h :=
have n ≤ m, from list.rel_of_sorted_cons h _ (l.mem_cons_self _),
by simp [raise, lower, tsub_add_cancel_of_le this, raise_lower h.of_cons]
lemma raise_chain : ∀ l n, list.chain (≤) n (raise l n)
| [] n := list.chain.nil
| (m :: l) n := list.chain.cons (nat.le_add_left _ _) (raise_chain _ _)
/-- `raise l n` is an non-decreasing sequence. -/
lemma raise_sorted : ∀ l n, list.sorted (≤) (raise l n)
| [] n := list.sorted_nil
| (m :: l) n := (list.chain_iff_pairwise (@le_trans _ _)).1 (raise_chain _ _)
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then so is `multiset α`. Warning: this is *not* the same encoding as used
in `multiset.encodable`. -/
instance multiset : denumerable (multiset α) := mk' ⟨
λ s : multiset α, encode $ lower ((s.map encode).sort (≤)) 0,
λ n, multiset.map (of_nat α) (raise (of_nat (list ℕ) n) 0),
λ s, by have := raise_lower
(list.sorted_cons.2 ⟨λ n _, zero_le n, (s.map encode).sort_sorted _⟩);
simp [-multiset.coe_map, this],
λ n, by simp [-multiset.coe_map, list.merge_sort_eq_self _ (raise_sorted _ _), lower_raise]⟩
end multiset
section finset
/-- Outputs the list of differences minus one of the input list, that is
`lower' [a₁, a₂, a₃, ...] n = [a₁ - n, a₂ - a₁ - 1, a₃ - a₂ - 1, ...]`. -/
def lower' : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m - n) :: lower' l (m + 1)
/-- Outputs the list of partial sums plus one of the input list, that is
`raise [a₁, a₂, a₃, ...] n = [n + a₁, n + a₁ + a₂ + 1, n + a₁ + a₂ + a₃ + 2, ...]`. Adding one each
time ensures the elements are distinct. -/
def raise' : list ℕ → ℕ → list ℕ
| [] n := []
| (m :: l) n := (m + n) :: raise' l (m + n + 1)
lemma lower_raise' : ∀ l n, lower' (raise' l n) n = l
| [] n := rfl
| (m :: l) n := by simp [raise', lower', add_tsub_cancel_right, lower_raise']
lemma raise_lower' : ∀ {l n}, (∀ m ∈ l, n ≤ m) → list.sorted (<) l → raise' (lower' l n) n = l
| [] n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (m :: l) n h₁ h₂ :=
have n ≤ m, from h₁ _ (l.mem_cons_self _),
by simp [raise', lower', tsub_add_cancel_of_le this, raise_lower'
(list.rel_of_sorted_cons h₂ : ∀ a ∈ l, m < a) h₂.of_cons]
lemma raise'_chain : ∀ l {m n}, m < n → list.chain (<) m (raise' l n)
| [] m n h := list.chain.nil
| (a :: l) m n h := list.chain.cons
(lt_of_lt_of_le h (nat.le_add_left _ _)) (raise'_chain _ (lt_succ_self _))
/-- `raise' l n` is a strictly increasing sequence. -/
lemma raise'_sorted : ∀ l n, list.sorted (<) (raise' l n)
| [] n := list.sorted_nil
| (m :: l) n := (list.chain_iff_pairwise (@lt_trans _ _)).1
(raise'_chain _ (lt_succ_self _))
/-- Makes `raise' l n` into a finset. Elements are distinct thanks to `raise'_sorted`. -/
def raise'_finset (l : list ℕ) (n : ℕ) : finset ℕ :=
⟨raise' l n, (raise'_sorted _ _).imp (@ne_of_lt _ _)⟩
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then so is `finset α`. Warning: this is *not* the same encoding as used
in `finset.encodable`. -/
instance finset : denumerable (finset α) := mk' ⟨
λ s : finset α, encode $ lower' ((s.map (eqv α).to_embedding).sort (≤)) 0,
λ n, finset.map (eqv α).symm.to_embedding (raise'_finset (of_nat (list ℕ) n) 0),
λ s, finset.eq_of_veq $ by simp [-multiset.coe_map, raise'_finset,
raise_lower' (λ n _, zero_le n) (finset.sort_sorted_lt _)],
λ n, by simp [-multiset.coe_map, finset.map, raise'_finset, finset.sort,
list.merge_sort_eq_self (≤) ((raise'_sorted _ _).imp (@le_of_lt _ _)),
lower_raise']⟩
end finset
end denumerable
namespace equiv
/-- The type lists on unit is canonically equivalent to the natural numbers. -/
def list_unit_equiv : list unit ≃ ℕ :=
{ to_fun := list.length,
inv_fun := list.repeat (),
left_inv := λ u, list.length_injective (by simp),
right_inv := λ n, list.length_repeat () n }
/-- `list ℕ` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def list_nat_equiv_nat : list ℕ ≃ ℕ := denumerable.eqv _
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `ℕ`, then `list α` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def list_equiv_self_of_equiv_nat {α : Type} (e : α ≃ ℕ) : list α ≃ α :=
calc list α ≃ list ℕ : list_equiv_of_equiv e
... ≃ ℕ : list_nat_equiv_nat
... ≃ α : e.symm
end equiv
|
12d87886506465969212aa2f29f8068bb2ecbf58 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /stage0/src/Leanpkg/Manifest.lean | 03912ee606a667bef8484ff74ccea44ecbc785e4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,769 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Leanpkg.Toml
import Leanpkg.LeanVersion
namespace Leanpkg
inductive Source where
| path (dirName : String) : Source
| git (url rev : String) (branch : Option String) : Source
namespace Source
def fromToml (v : Toml.Value) : Option Source :=
(do let Toml.Value.str dirName ← v.lookup "path" | none
path dirName) <|>
(do let Toml.Value.str url ← v.lookup "git" | none
let Toml.Value.str rev ← v.lookup "rev" | none
match v.lookup "branch" with
| none => git url rev none
| some (Toml.Value.str branch) => git url rev (some branch)
| _ => none)
def toToml : Source → Toml.Value
| path dirName => Toml.Value.table [("path", Toml.Value.str dirName)]
| git url rev none =>
Toml.Value.table [("git", Toml.Value.str url), ("rev", Toml.Value.str rev)]
| git url rev (some branch) =>
Toml.Value.table [("git", Toml.Value.str url), ("branch", Toml.Value.str branch), ("rev", Toml.Value.str rev)]
end Source
structure Dependency where
name : String
src : Source
structure Manifest where
name : String
version : String
leanVersion : String := leanVersionString
timeout : Option Nat := none
path : Option String := none
dependencies : List Dependency := []
namespace Manifest
def effectivePath (m : Manifest) : String :=
m.path.getD "."
def fromToml (t : Toml.Value) : Option Manifest := do
let pkg ← t.lookup "package"
let Toml.Value.str n ← pkg.lookup "name" | none
let Toml.Value.str ver ← pkg.lookup "version" | none
let leanVer ← match pkg.lookup "lean_version" with
| some (Toml.Value.str leanVer) => some leanVer
| none => some leanVersionString
| _ => none
let tm ← match pkg.lookup "timeout" with
| some (Toml.Value.nat timeout) => some (some timeout)
| none => some none
| _ => none
let path ← match pkg.lookup "path" with
| some (Toml.Value.str path) => some (some path)
| none => some none
| _ => none
let Toml.Value.table deps ← t.lookup "dependencies" <|> some (Toml.Value.table []) | none
let deps ← deps.mapM fun ⟨n, src⟩ => do Dependency.mk n (← Source.fromToml src)
return { name := n, version := ver, leanVersion := leanVer,
path := path, dependencies := deps, timeout := tm }
def fromFile (fn : String) : IO Manifest := do
let cnts ← IO.FS.readFile fn
let toml ← Toml.parse cnts
let some manifest ← pure (fromToml toml)
| throw <| IO.userError s!"cannot read manifest from {fn}"
manifest
end Manifest
def leanpkgTomlFn := "leanpkg.toml"
end Leanpkg
|
9a9d5973047f061cf9b5897a7302fb148c6f5c7b | f5373ccdc976e6390397d9f4220a74c76f706f4a | /src/lean_gym/server.lean | 975034ca5f673f0c26d9151543415c69cae7214b | [] | no_license | jasonrute/lean_gym_prototype | fcd91fdc454f9e351bbe258c765f50276407547e | ab29624d14e4e069e15afe0b1d90248b5b394b86 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,628,526,780 | 1,590,539,315,000 | 1,590,539,315,000 | 264,938,525 | 3 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,331 | lean | import lean_gym.interface_m
import tools.serialization -- TODO: Serialize Lean's standard raw expression format
import system.io
-- read eval print loop
namespace lean_gym
meta def deserialize_expr (sexpr : string) : interface_m expr :=
match (expr.deserialize sexpr) with
| (sum.inl error_msg) := throw (interface_ex.user_input_exception ("Error parsing s-expression: " ++ error_msg))
| (sum.inr h) := return h
end
meta def pp_sexpr (ts : tactic_state) (sexpr : string) : interface_m string := do
exp <- deserialize_expr sexpr,
interface_m.run_tactic1 ts (do fmt <- tactic.pp exp, return fmt.to_string)
meta def tactic_str (ts : tactic_state) : lean_tactic -> interface_m string
| (lean_tactic.skip) := return "skip"
| (lean_tactic.apply sexpr) := do
h_str <- pp_sexpr ts sexpr,
return $ "apply " ++ h_str
| (lean_tactic.cases sexpr) := do
h_str <- pp_sexpr ts sexpr,
return $ "cases " ++ h_str
| lean_tactic.intro := return "intro"
| lean_tactic.split := return "split"
| lean_tactic.left := return "left"
| lean_tactic.right := return "right"
| lean_tactic.exfalso := return "exfalso"
meta def apply_tactic (ts : tactic_state) (t : tactic unit): interface_m tactic_state := do
catch (interface_m.run_tactic2 ts t) $ λ e, match e with
| interface_ex.tactic_exception error := throw (interface_ex.apply_tactic_exception error)
| e := throw e
end
meta def apply_lean_tactic (ts : tactic_state) : lean_tactic -> interface_m tactic_state
| (lean_tactic.skip) := do
apply_tactic ts (tactic.interactive.skip)
| (lean_tactic.apply sexpr) := do
h <- deserialize_expr sexpr,
apply_tactic ts (tactic.interactive.concat_tags (tactic.apply h))
| (lean_tactic.cases sexpr) := do
h <- deserialize_expr sexpr,
apply_tactic ts (tactic.interactive.cases_core h [])
| lean_tactic.intro := apply_tactic ts (tactic.interactive.propagate_tags (tactic.intro1 >> tactic.skip))
| lean_tactic.split := apply_tactic ts (tactic.interactive.split)
| lean_tactic.left := apply_tactic ts (tactic.interactive.left)
| lean_tactic.right := apply_tactic ts (tactic.interactive.right)
| lean_tactic.exfalso := apply_tactic ts (tactic.interactive.exfalso)
meta def mk_new_goal (ts0 : tactic_state) (goal : expr) : interface_m tactic_state := do
interface_m.run_tactic2 ts0 $ (do
v <- tactic.mk_meta_var goal,
tactic.set_goals [v],
return ()
)
meta def mk_new_goal2 (ts0 : tactic_state) (goal : pexpr) : interface_m tactic_state := do
interface_m.run_tactic2 ts0 $ (do
exp <- tactic.to_expr goal,
v <- tactic.mk_meta_var exp,
tactic.set_goals [v],
return ()
)
meta def change_goal (sexp : string) : interface_m unit := do
goal_expr <- deserialize_expr sexp,
ts0 <- interface_m.get_inital_tactic_state,
ts <- mk_new_goal ts0 goal_expr,
interface_m.reset_all_tactic_states ts
meta def change_goal_pp (goal : string) : interface_m unit := do
config <- interface_m.read_config,
match config.ps with
| some ps := do
pexp <- interface_m.parse_string ps goal,
ts0 <- interface_m.get_inital_tactic_state,
ts <- mk_new_goal2 ts0 pexp,
interface_m.reset_all_tactic_states ts
| none := throw $ interface_ex.user_input_exception
"In this configuration, the Lean parser is not available to enter goals as Lean expressions. Use an s-expression or run in a different way."
end
meta def change_state : lean_state_control -> interface_m unit
| (lean_state_control.jump_to_state state_index) :=
interface_m.set_tactic_state state_index
| (lean_state_control.change_top_goal sexp) :=
change_goal sexp
| (lean_state_control.change_top_goal_pp goal) :=
change_goal_pp goal
meta def state_info_str (st_ix : nat) (proof_str : string): tactic string := do
let s := "Proof state:",
st ← tactic.read,
let fmt := to_fmt st,
fmt <- tactic.pp fmt,
let s := s ++ "\n" ++ (to_string fmt),
let s := s ++ "\n",
let s := s ++ "\n" ++ "Current state index:",
let s := s ++ "\n" ++ (to_string st_ix),
let s := s ++ "\n",
let s := s ++ "\n" ++ "Pretty-printed proof:",
let s := s ++ "\n" ++ proof_str,
let s := s ++ "\n",
s1 <- (do
let s1 := s ++ "\n" ++ "Local names:",
lctx ← tactic.local_context,
let ls := lctx.map (λ e, expr.representation.form_of_expr e),
let s1 := s1 ++ "\n" ++ (string.intercalate "\n" ls),
return s1
) <|> (return s),
return s1
meta def get_state_info (ts : tactic_state) (ix : nat): interface_m string := do
proof_str <- interface_m.get_pp_proof ix,
interface_m.run_tactic1 ts (state_info_str ix proof_str)
meta def handle_apply_tactic_request (tac : lean_tactic) : interface_m lean_server_response :=
catch (do
ts <- interface_m.get_current_tactic_state,
ix <- interface_m.get_current_tactic_state_ix,
tac_str <- tactic_str ts tac,
ts <- apply_lean_tactic ts tac,
ix <- interface_m.register_tactic_state ts ix tac_str,
state_info <- get_state_info ts ix,
let msg := "Tactic succeeded:" ++ "\n" ++ state_info,
let result := lean_tactic_result.success msg,
let response := lean_server_response.apply_tactic result,
return response
) $ λ e, match e with
| interface_ex.apply_tactic_exception fmt_opt := do
let msg := match fmt_opt with
| some fmt := "Tactic failed: " ++ (to_string (fmt ()))
| none := "Tactic failed: <no message>"
end,
let result := lean_tactic_result.failure msg,
let response := lean_server_response.apply_tactic result,
return response
| interface_ex.tactic_exception fmt_opt := do
let msg := match fmt_opt with
| some fmt := "Unable to apply tactic: " ++ (to_string (fmt ()))
| none := "Unable to apply tactic: <no message>"
end,
let result := lean_tactic_result.server_error msg,
let response := lean_server_response.apply_tactic result,
return response
| interface_ex.user_input_exception msg := do
let msg := "Unable to apply tactic: " ++ msg,
let result := lean_tactic_result.server_error msg,
let response := lean_server_response.apply_tactic result,
return response
| e := throw e
end
meta def handle_change_state_request (state_control : lean_state_control) : interface_m lean_server_response :=
catch (do
change_state state_control,
ts <- interface_m.get_current_tactic_state,
ix <- interface_m.get_current_tactic_state_ix,
state_info <- get_state_info ts ix,
let msg := "state change succeeded:" ++ "\n" ++ state_info,
let result := lean_state_result.success msg,
let response := lean_server_response.change_state result,
return response
) $ λ e, match e with
| interface_ex.tactic_exception fmt_opt := do
let msg := match fmt_opt with
| some fmt := "State change failed: " ++ (to_string (fmt ()))
| none := "State change failed: <no message>"
end,
let result := lean_state_result.server_error msg,
let response := lean_server_response.change_state result,
return response
| interface_ex.user_input_exception msg := do
let msg := "State change failed: " ++ msg,
let result := lean_state_result.server_error msg,
let response := lean_server_response.change_state result,
return response
| e := throw e
end
meta def eval_user_request : lean_server_request → interface_m lean_server_response
| (lean_server_request.apply_tactic tac) := handle_apply_tactic_request tac
| (lean_server_request.change_state state_control) := handle_change_state_request state_control
| (lean_server_request.exit msg) := return (lean_server_response.exit msg)
meta def server_loop : interface_m (option string) := do
response <- catch (do
-- TODO: Might want to split into errors that are parsing errors (json type things) and ones that are bugs on my end
request <- interface_m.read_io_request,
eval_user_request request
) (λ e,
match e with
| interface_ex.tactic_exception fmt_opt := do
let msg := match fmt_opt with
| some fmt := "Unexpected error processing request: " ++ (to_string (fmt ()))
| none := "Unexpected error processing request: <no message>"
end,
let response := lean_server_response.error msg,
return response
| interface_ex.parser_exception fmt_opt := do
let msg := match fmt_opt with
| some fmt := "Unexpected error processing request: " ++ (to_string (fmt ()))
| none := "Unexpected error processing request: <no message>"
end,
let response := lean_server_response.error msg,
return response
| interface_ex.io_exception fmt_opt := do
let msg := match fmt_opt with
| some fmt := "Unexpected error processing request: " ++ (to_string (fmt ()))
| none := "Unexpected error processing request: <no message>"
end,
let response := lean_server_response.error msg,
return response
| e := throw e
end
),
interface_m.write_io_response response,
match response with
| lean_server_response.exit msg := do
return msg
| e := server_loop
end
-- commands for running the interface
-- TODO: maybe it is better not to have the initial tactic state inside the config
-- so that the config can be made ahead of time
meta def run_server_from_tactic (server : json_server lean_server_request lean_server_response) : tactic (except interface_ex (option string)) := do
ts <- get_state,
let config : interface_config := {
server := server,
ps := none,
initial_ts := ts
},
-- it is very important that we do something with `server_loop.run config`
-- (like return it) otherwise it won't be executed
return $ server_loop.run config
meta def get_parser_state : lean.parser lean.parser_state :=
λ ps, interaction_monad.result.success ps ps
meta def tactic_state_at_goal (goal : pexpr) : lean.parser tactic_state :=
lean.parser.of_tactic $ do
e <- tactic.to_expr goal,
v <- tactic.mk_meta_var e,
tactic.set_goals [v],
ts <- get_state,
return ts
meta def run_server_from_parser (server : json_server lean_server_request lean_server_response) (goal : pexpr) : lean.parser (except interface_ex (option string)) := do
ps <- get_parser_state,
ts <- tactic_state_at_goal goal,
let config : interface_config := {
server := server,
ps := ps,
initial_ts := ts
},
-- it is very important that we do something with `server_loop.run config`
-- (like return it) otherwise it won't be executed
return $ server_loop.run config
meta def run_server_from_io (server : json_server lean_server_request lean_server_response): io unit := do
io.run_tactic (run_server_from_tactic server),
return ()
end lean_gym |
e310709fa2404fa1220bd20e2f644d2fd7da2373 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /library/smt/arith.lean | 2f67fc9b96eae245287a3d5bf9a91e822eec3525 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 620 | lean | constants (real : Type)
constants (real.has_zero : has_zero real)
constants (real.has_one : has_one real)
constants (real.has_add : has_add real)
constants (real.has_mul : has_mul real)
constants (real.has_sub : has_sub real)
constants (real.has_neg : has_neg real)
constants (real.has_div : has_div real)
constants (real.has_lt : has_lt real)
constants (real.has_le : has_le real)
attribute [instance] real.has_zero real.has_one real.has_add real.has_mul real.has_sub real.has_neg real.has_div real.has_le real.has_lt
constants (real.of_int : int → real) (real.to_int : real → int) (real.is_int : real → Prop)
|
e96841df3535b257b1e9ecfedb4d5de665b473aa | 4950bf76e5ae40ba9f8491647d0b6f228ddce173 | /src/group_theory/sylow.lean | 447d9c0804a9c6db37e886a96cb135e96a998a27 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ntzwq/mathlib | ca50b21079b0a7c6781c34b62199a396dd00cee2 | 36eec1a98f22df82eaccd354a758ef8576af2a7f | refs/heads/master | 1,675,193,391,478 | 1,607,822,996,000 | 1,607,822,996,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,269 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import group_theory.group_action
import group_theory.quotient_group
import group_theory.order_of_element
import data.zmod.basic
import data.fintype.card
import data.list.rotate
open equiv fintype finset mul_action function
open equiv.perm subgroup list quotient_group
open_locale big_operators
universes u v w
variables {G : Type u} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} [group G]
local attribute [instance, priority 10] subtype.fintype set_fintype classical.prop_decidable
namespace mul_action
variables [mul_action G α]
lemma mem_fixed_points_iff_card_orbit_eq_one {a : α}
[fintype (orbit G a)] : a ∈ fixed_points G α ↔ card (orbit G a) = 1 :=
begin
rw [fintype.card_eq_one_iff, mem_fixed_points],
split,
{ exact λ h, ⟨⟨a, mem_orbit_self _⟩, λ ⟨b, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩, subtype.eq $ by simp [h x, hx.symm]⟩ },
{ assume h x,
rcases h with ⟨⟨z, hz⟩, hz₁⟩,
exact calc x • a = z : subtype.mk.inj (hz₁ ⟨x • a, mem_orbit _ _⟩)
... = a : (subtype.mk.inj (hz₁ ⟨a, mem_orbit_self _⟩)).symm }
end
-- This instance causes `exact card_quotient_dvd_card _` to timeout.
local attribute [-instance] quotient_group.quotient.fintype
lemma card_modeq_card_fixed_points [fintype α] [fintype G] [fintype (fixed_points G α)]
(p : ℕ) {n : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime] (h : card G = p ^ n) :
card α ≡ card (fixed_points G α) [MOD p] :=
calc card α = card (Σ y : quotient (orbit_rel G α), {x // quotient.mk' x = y}) :
card_congr (sigma_preimage_equiv (@quotient.mk' _ (orbit_rel G α))).symm
... = ∑ a : quotient (orbit_rel G α), card {x // quotient.mk' x = a} : card_sigma _
... ≡ ∑ a : fixed_points G α, 1 [MOD p] :
begin
rw [← zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat p, sum_nat_cast, sum_nat_cast],
refine eq.symm (sum_bij_ne_zero (λ a _ _, quotient.mk' a.1)
(λ _ _ _, mem_univ _)
(λ a₁ a₂ _ _ _ _ h,
subtype.eq ((mem_fixed_points' α).1 a₂.2 a₁.1 (quotient.exact' h)))
(λ b, _)
(λ a ha _, by rw [← mem_fixed_points_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.1 a.2];
simp only [quotient.eq']; congr)),
{ refine quotient.induction_on' b (λ b _ hb, _),
have : card (orbit G b) ∣ p ^ n,
{ rw [← h, fintype.card_congr (orbit_equiv_quotient_stabilizer G b)],
exact card_quotient_dvd_card _ },
rcases (nat.dvd_prime_pow hp).1 this with ⟨k, _, hk⟩,
have hb' :¬ p ^ 1 ∣ p ^ k,
{ rw [pow_one, ← hk, ← nat.modeq.modeq_zero_iff, ← zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat,
nat.cast_zero, ← ne.def],
exact eq.mpr (by simp only [quotient.eq']; congr) hb },
have : k = 0 := nat.le_zero_iff.1 (nat.le_of_lt_succ (lt_of_not_ge (mt (pow_dvd_pow p) hb'))),
refine ⟨⟨b, mem_fixed_points_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.2 $ by rw [hk, this, pow_zero]⟩,
mem_univ _, _, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.cast_one], exact one_ne_zero }
end
... = _ : by simp; refl
end mul_action
lemma quotient_group.card_preimage_mk [fintype G] (s : subgroup G)
(t : set (quotient s)) : fintype.card (quotient_group.mk ⁻¹' t) =
fintype.card s * fintype.card t :=
by rw [← fintype.card_prod, fintype.card_congr
(preimage_mk_equiv_subgroup_times_set _ _)]
namespace sylow
/-- Given a vector `v` of length `n`, make a vector of length `n+1` whose product is `1`,
by consing the the inverse of the product of `v`. -/
def mk_vector_prod_eq_one (n : ℕ) (v : vector G n) : vector G (n+1) :=
v.to_list.prod⁻¹ ::ᵥ v
lemma mk_vector_prod_eq_one_injective (n : ℕ) : injective (@mk_vector_prod_eq_one G _ n) :=
λ ⟨v, _⟩ ⟨w, _⟩ h, subtype.eq (show v = w, by injection h with h; injection h)
/-- The type of vectors with terms from `G`, length `n`, and product equal to `1:G`. -/
def vectors_prod_eq_one (G : Type*) [group G] (n : ℕ) : set (vector G n) :=
{v | v.to_list.prod = 1}
lemma mem_vectors_prod_eq_one {n : ℕ} (v : vector G n) :
v ∈ vectors_prod_eq_one G n ↔ v.to_list.prod = 1 := iff.rfl
lemma mem_vectors_prod_eq_one_iff {n : ℕ} (v : vector G (n + 1)) :
v ∈ vectors_prod_eq_one G (n + 1) ↔ v ∈ set.range (@mk_vector_prod_eq_one G _ n) :=
⟨λ (h : v.to_list.prod = 1), ⟨v.tail,
begin
unfold mk_vector_prod_eq_one,
conv {to_rhs, rw ← vector.cons_head_tail v},
suffices : (v.tail.to_list.prod)⁻¹ = v.head,
{ rw this },
rw [← mul_left_inj v.tail.to_list.prod, inv_mul_self, ← list.prod_cons,
← vector.to_list_cons, vector.cons_head_tail, h]
end⟩,
λ ⟨w, hw⟩, by rw [mem_vectors_prod_eq_one, ← hw, mk_vector_prod_eq_one,
vector.to_list_cons, list.prod_cons, inv_mul_self]⟩
/-- The rotation action of `zmod n` (viewed as multiplicative group) on
`vectors_prod_eq_one G n`, where `G` is a multiplicative group. -/
def rotate_vectors_prod_eq_one (G : Type*) [group G] (n : ℕ)
(m : multiplicative (zmod n)) (v : vectors_prod_eq_one G n) : vectors_prod_eq_one G n :=
⟨⟨v.1.to_list.rotate m.val, by simp⟩, prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one v.2 _⟩
instance rotate_vectors_prod_eq_one.mul_action (n : ℕ) [fact (0 < n)] :
mul_action (multiplicative (zmod n)) (vectors_prod_eq_one G n) :=
{ smul := (rotate_vectors_prod_eq_one G n),
one_smul :=
begin
intro v, apply subtype.eq, apply vector.eq _ _,
show rotate _ (0 : zmod n).val = _, rw zmod.val_zero,
exact rotate_zero v.1.to_list
end,
mul_smul := λ a b ⟨⟨v, hv₁⟩, hv₂⟩, subtype.eq $ vector.eq _ _ $
show v.rotate ((a + b : zmod n).val) = list.rotate (list.rotate v (b.val)) (a.val),
by rw [zmod.val_add, rotate_rotate, ← rotate_mod _ (b.val + a.val), add_comm, hv₁] }
lemma one_mem_vectors_prod_eq_one (n : ℕ) : vector.repeat (1 : G) n ∈ vectors_prod_eq_one G n :=
by simp [vector.repeat, vectors_prod_eq_one]
lemma one_mem_fixed_points_rotate (n : ℕ) [fact (0 < n)] :
(⟨vector.repeat (1 : G) n, one_mem_vectors_prod_eq_one n⟩ : vectors_prod_eq_one G n) ∈
fixed_points (multiplicative (zmod n)) (vectors_prod_eq_one G n) :=
λ m, subtype.eq $ vector.eq _ _ $
rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_repeat.2 ⟨(1 : G),
show list.repeat (1 : G) n = list.repeat 1 (list.repeat (1 : G) n).length, by simp⟩ _
/-- Cauchy's theorem -/
lemma exists_prime_order_of_dvd_card [fintype G] (p : ℕ) [hp : fact p.prime]
(hdvd : p ∣ card G) : ∃ x : G, order_of x = p :=
let n : ℕ+ := ⟨p - 1, nat.sub_pos_of_lt hp.one_lt⟩ in
have hn : p = n + 1 := nat.succ_sub hp.pos,
have hcard : card (vectors_prod_eq_one G (n + 1)) = card G ^ (n : ℕ),
by rw [set.ext mem_vectors_prod_eq_one_iff,
set.card_range_of_injective (mk_vector_prod_eq_one_injective _), card_vector],
have hzmod : fintype.card (multiplicative (zmod p)) = p ^ 1,
by { rw pow_one p, exact zmod.card p },
have hmodeq : _ = _ := @mul_action.card_modeq_card_fixed_points
(multiplicative (zmod p)) (vectors_prod_eq_one G p) _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 hp hzmod,
have hdvdcard : p ∣ fintype.card (vectors_prod_eq_one G (n + 1)) :=
calc p ∣ card G ^ 1 : by rwa pow_one
... ∣ card G ^ (n : ℕ) : pow_dvd_pow _ n.2
... = card (vectors_prod_eq_one G (n + 1)) : hcard.symm,
have hdvdcard₂ : p ∣ card (fixed_points (multiplicative (zmod p)) (vectors_prod_eq_one G p)),
by { rw nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero at hdvdcard ⊢, rwa [← hn, hmodeq] at hdvdcard },
have hcard_pos : 0 < card (fixed_points (multiplicative (zmod p)) (vectors_prod_eq_one G p)) :=
fintype.card_pos_iff.2 ⟨⟨⟨vector.repeat 1 p, one_mem_vectors_prod_eq_one _⟩,
one_mem_fixed_points_rotate _⟩⟩,
have hlt : 1 < card (fixed_points (multiplicative (zmod p)) (vectors_prod_eq_one G p)) :=
calc (1 : ℕ) < p : hp.one_lt
... ≤ _ : nat.le_of_dvd hcard_pos hdvdcard₂,
let ⟨⟨⟨⟨x, hx₁⟩, hx₂⟩, hx₃⟩, hx₄⟩ := fintype.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card hlt
⟨_, one_mem_fixed_points_rotate p⟩ in
have hx : x ≠ list.repeat (1 : G) p, from λ h, by simpa [h, vector.repeat] using hx₄,
have ∃ a, x = list.repeat a x.length := by exactI rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_repeat.1 (λ n,
have list.rotate x (n : zmod p).val = x :=
subtype.mk.inj (subtype.mk.inj (hx₃ (n : zmod p))),
by rwa [zmod.val_cast_nat, ← hx₁, rotate_mod] at this),
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := this in
⟨a, have hx1 : x.prod = 1 := hx₂,
have ha1: a ≠ 1, from λ h, hx (ha.symm ▸ h ▸ hx₁ ▸ rfl),
have a ^ p = 1, by rwa [ha, list.prod_repeat, hx₁] at hx1,
(hp.2 _ (order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one this)).resolve_left
(λ h, ha1 (order_of_eq_one_iff.1 h))⟩
open subgroup submonoid is_group_hom mul_action
lemma mem_fixed_points_mul_left_cosets_iff_mem_normalizer {H : subgroup G}
[fintype ((H : set G) : Type u)] {x : G} :
(x : quotient H) ∈ fixed_points H (quotient H) ↔ x ∈ normalizer H :=
⟨λ hx, have ha : ∀ {y : quotient H}, y ∈ orbit H (x : quotient H) → y = x,
from λ _, ((mem_fixed_points' _).1 hx _),
(inv_mem_iff _).1 (@mem_normalizer_fintype _ _ _ _inst_2 _ (λ n (hn : n ∈ H),
have (n⁻¹ * x)⁻¹ * x ∈ H := quotient_group.eq.1 (ha (mem_orbit _ ⟨n⁻¹, H.inv_mem hn⟩)),
show _ ∈ H, by {rw [mul_inv_rev, inv_inv] at this, convert this, rw inv_inv}
)),
λ (hx : ∀ (n : G), n ∈ H ↔ x * n * x⁻¹ ∈ H),
(mem_fixed_points' _).2 $ λ y, quotient.induction_on' y $ λ y hy, quotient_group.eq.2
(let ⟨⟨b, hb₁⟩, hb₂⟩ := hy in
have hb₂ : (b * x)⁻¹ * y ∈ H := quotient_group.eq.1 hb₂,
(inv_mem_iff H).1 $ (hx _).2 $ (mul_mem_cancel_left H (H.inv_mem hb₁)).1
$ by rw hx at hb₂;
simpa [mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc] using hb₂)⟩
def fixed_points_mul_left_cosets_equiv_quotient (H : subgroup G) [fintype (H : set G)] :
fixed_points H (quotient H) ≃
quotient (subgroup.comap ((normalizer H).subtype : normalizer H →* G) H) :=
@subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype G (normalizer H : set G) (id _) (id _) (fixed_points _ _)
(λ a, (@mem_fixed_points_mul_left_cosets_iff_mem_normalizer _ _ _ _inst_2 _).symm)
(by intros; refl)
lemma exists_subgroup_card_pow_prime [fintype G] (p : ℕ) : ∀ {n : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime]
(hdvd : p ^ n ∣ card G), ∃ H : subgroup G, fintype.card H = p ^ n
| 0 := λ _ _, ⟨(⊥ : subgroup G), by convert card_trivial⟩
| (n+1) := λ hp hdvd,
let ⟨H, hH2⟩ := @exists_subgroup_card_pow_prime _ hp
(dvd.trans (pow_dvd_pow _ (nat.le_succ _)) hdvd) in
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd hdvd in
have hcard : card (quotient H) = s * p :=
(nat.mul_left_inj (show card H > 0, from fintype.card_pos_iff.2
⟨⟨1, H.one_mem⟩⟩)).1
(by rwa [← card_eq_card_quotient_mul_card_subgroup H, hH2, hs,
pow_succ', mul_assoc, mul_comm p]),
have hm : s * p % p =
card (quotient (subgroup.comap ((normalizer H).subtype : normalizer H →* G) H)) % p :=
card_congr (fixed_points_mul_left_cosets_equiv_quotient H) ▸ hcard ▸
@card_modeq_card_fixed_points _ _ _ _ _ _ _ p _ hp hH2,
have hm' : p ∣ card (quotient (subgroup.comap ((normalizer H).subtype : normalizer H →* G) H)) :=
nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
(by rwa [nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd (dvd_mul_left _ _), eq_comm] at hm),
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := @exists_prime_order_of_dvd_card _ (quotient_group.quotient.group _) _ _ hp hm' in
have hequiv : H ≃ (subgroup.comap ((normalizer H).subtype : normalizer H →* G) H) :=
⟨λ a, ⟨⟨a.1, le_normalizer a.2⟩, a.2⟩, λ a, ⟨a.1.1, a.2⟩,
λ ⟨_, _⟩, rfl, λ ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl⟩,
-- begin proof of ∃ H : subgroup G, fintype.card H = p ^ n
⟨subgroup.map ((normalizer H).subtype) (subgroup.comap (quotient_group.mk' _) (gpowers x)),
begin
show card ↥(map H.normalizer.subtype
(comap (mk' (comap H.normalizer.subtype H)) (subgroup.gpowers x))) = p ^ (n + 1),
suffices : card ↥(subtype.val '' ((subgroup.comap (mk' (comap H.normalizer.subtype H))
(gpowers x)) : set (↥(H.normalizer)))) = p^(n+1),
{ convert this },
rw [set.card_image_of_injective
(subgroup.comap (mk' _) (gpowers x) : set (H.normalizer)) subtype.val_injective,
pow_succ', ← hH2, fintype.card_congr hequiv, ← hx, order_eq_card_gpowers,
← fintype.card_prod],
exact @fintype.card_congr _ _ (id _) (id _) (preimage_mk_equiv_subgroup_times_set _ _)
end⟩
end sylow
|
0e8ec48d83b288c05855f3a0b79e465760d61cde | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /stage0/src/Std/Data/AssocList.lean | fe8271645b5845b5e52cbede4a0a171acf2202ad | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,372 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
namespace Std
universes u v w
/- List-like type to avoid extra level of indirection -/
inductive AssocList (α : Type u) (β : Type v)
| nil : AssocList
| cons (key : α) (value : β) (tail : AssocList) : AssocList
namespace AssocList
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w} {m : Type w → Type w} [Monad m]
abbrev empty : AssocList α β :=
nil
instance : HasEmptyc (AssocList α β) := ⟨empty⟩
abbrev insert (m : AssocList α β) (k : α) (v : β) : AssocList α β :=
m.cons k v
def isEmpty : AssocList α β → Bool
| nil => true
| _ => false
@[specialize] def foldlM (f : δ → α → β → m δ) : δ → AssocList α β → m δ
| d, nil => pure d
| d, cons a b es => do d ← f d a b; foldlM d es
@[inline] def foldl (f : δ → α → β → δ) (d : δ) (as : AssocList α β) : δ :=
Id.run (foldlM f d as)
def mapKey (f : α → δ) : AssocList α β → AssocList δ β
| nil => nil
| cons k v t => cons (f k) v (mapKey t)
def mapVal (f : β → δ) : AssocList α β → AssocList α δ
| nil => nil
| cons k v t => cons k (f v) (mapVal t)
def findEntry? [HasBeq α] (a : α) : AssocList α β → Option (α × β)
| nil => none
| cons k v es => match k == a with
| true => some (k, v)
| false => findEntry? es
def find? [HasBeq α] (a : α) : AssocList α β → Option β
| nil => none
| cons k v es => match k == a with
| true => some v
| false => find? es
def contains [HasBeq α] (a : α) : AssocList α β → Bool
| nil => false
| cons k v es => k == a || contains es
def replace [HasBeq α] (a : α) (b : β) : AssocList α β → AssocList α β
| nil => nil
| cons k v es => match k == a with
| true => cons a b es
| false => cons k v (replace es)
def erase [HasBeq α] (a : α) : AssocList α β → AssocList α β
| nil => nil
| cons k v es => match k == a with
| true => es
| false => cons k v (erase es)
def any (p : α → β → Bool) : AssocList α β → Bool
| nil => false
| cons k v es => p k v || any es
def all (p : α → β → Bool) : AssocList α β → Bool
| nil => true
| cons k v es => p k v && all es
end AssocList
end Std
|
191c1151ec348fce2e7d24c2f646ecc957a23a83 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/linear_algebra/pi.lean | 17521b57d695ff2477be7886e3b89220f461bf54 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,051 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Eric Wieser
-/
import linear_algebra.basic
import logic.equiv.fin
/-!
# Pi types of modules
This file defines constructors for linear maps whose domains or codomains are pi types.
It contains theorems relating these to each other, as well as to `linear_map.ker`.
## Main definitions
- pi types in the codomain:
- `linear_map.pi`
- `linear_map.single`
- pi types in the domain:
- `linear_map.proj`
- `linear_map.diag`
-/
universes u v w x y z u' v' w' x' y'
variables {R : Type u} {K : Type u'} {M : Type v} {V : Type v'} {M₂ : Type w} {V₂ : Type w'}
variables {M₃ : Type y} {V₃ : Type y'} {M₄ : Type z} {ι : Type x} {ι' : Type x'}
open function submodule
open_locale big_operators
namespace linear_map
universe i
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [module R M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃] [module R M₃]
{φ : ι → Type i} [∀i, add_comm_monoid (φ i)] [∀i, module R (φ i)]
/-- `pi` construction for linear functions. From a family of linear functions it produces a linear
function into a family of modules. -/
def pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : M₂ →ₗ[R] (Πi, φ i) :=
{ to_fun := λ c i, f i c,
map_add' := λ c d, funext $ λ i, (f i).map_add _ _,
map_smul' := λ c d, funext $ λ i, (f i).map_smul _ _ }
@[simp] lemma pi_apply (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (c : M₂) (i : ι) :
pi f c i = f i c := rfl
lemma ker_pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : ker (pi f) = (⨅i:ι, ker (f i)) :=
by ext c; simp [funext_iff]; refl
lemma pi_eq_zero (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) : pi f = 0 ↔ (∀i, f i = 0) :=
by simp only [linear_map.ext_iff, pi_apply, funext_iff]; exact ⟨λh a b, h b a, λh a b, h b a⟩
lemma pi_zero : pi (λi, 0 : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) = 0 :=
by ext; refl
lemma pi_comp (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₂) : (pi f).comp g = pi (λi, (f i).comp g) :=
rfl
/-- The projections from a family of modules are linear maps.
Note: known here as `linear_map.proj`, this construction is in other categories called `eval`, for
example `pi.eval_monoid_hom`, `pi.eval_ring_hom`. -/
def proj (i : ι) : (Πi, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i :=
{ to_fun := function.eval i, map_add' := λ f g, rfl, map_smul' := λ c f, rfl }
@[simp] lemma coe_proj (i : ι) : ⇑(proj i : (Πi, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i) = function.eval i := rfl
lemma proj_apply (i : ι) (b : Πi, φ i) : (proj i : (Πi, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i) b = b i := rfl
lemma proj_pi (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (pi f) = f i :=
ext $ assume c, rfl
lemma infi_ker_proj : (⨅i, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ set_like.le_def.2 $ assume a h,
begin
simp only [mem_infi, mem_ker, proj_apply] at h,
exact (mem_bot _).2 (funext $ assume i, h i)
end
/-- Linear map between the function spaces `I → M₂` and `I → M₃`, induced by a linear map `f`
between `M₂` and `M₃`. -/
@[simps] protected def comp_left (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (I : Type*) : (I → M₂) →ₗ[R] (I → M₃) :=
{ to_fun := λ h, f ∘ h,
map_smul' := λ c h, by { ext x, exact f.map_smul' c (h x) },
.. f.to_add_monoid_hom.comp_left I }
lemma apply_single [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [decidable_eq ι]
(f : Π i, φ i →ₗ[R] M) (i j : ι) (x : φ i) :
f j (pi.single i x j) = pi.single i (f i x) j :=
pi.apply_single (λ i, f i) (λ i, (f i).map_zero) _ _ _
/-- The `linear_map` version of `add_monoid_hom.single` and `pi.single`. -/
def single [decidable_eq ι] (i : ι) : φ i →ₗ[R] (Πi, φ i) :=
{ to_fun := pi.single i,
map_smul' := pi.single_smul i,
.. add_monoid_hom.single φ i}
@[simp] lemma coe_single [decidable_eq ι] (i : ι) :
⇑(single i : φ i →ₗ[R] (Π i, φ i)) = pi.single i := rfl
variables (R φ)
/-- The linear equivalence between linear functions on a finite product of modules and
families of functions on these modules. See note [bundled maps over different rings]. -/
@[simps] def lsum (S) [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [fintype ι] [decidable_eq ι]
[semiring S] [module S M] [smul_comm_class R S M] :
(Π i, φ i →ₗ[R] M) ≃ₗ[S] ((Π i, φ i) →ₗ[R] M) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, ∑ i : ι, (f i).comp (proj i),
inv_fun := λ f i, f.comp (single i),
map_add' := λ f g, by simp only [pi.add_apply, add_comp, finset.sum_add_distrib],
map_smul' := λ c f, by simp only [pi.smul_apply, smul_comp, finset.smul_sum, ring_hom.id_apply],
left_inv := λ f, by { ext i x, simp [apply_single] },
right_inv := λ f,
begin
ext,
suffices : f (∑ j, pi.single j (x j)) = f x, by simpa [apply_single],
rw finset.univ_sum_single
end }
variables {R φ}
section ext
variables [fintype ι] [decidable_eq ι] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
{f g : (Π i, φ i) →ₗ[R] M}
lemma pi_ext (h : ∀ i x, f (pi.single i x) = g (pi.single i x)) :
f = g :=
to_add_monoid_hom_injective $ add_monoid_hom.functions_ext _ _ _ h
lemma pi_ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ i x, f (pi.single i x) = g (pi.single i x) :=
⟨λ h i x, h ▸ rfl, pi_ext⟩
/-- This is used as the ext lemma instead of `linear_map.pi_ext` for reasons explained in
note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext] lemma pi_ext' (h : ∀ i, f.comp (single i) = g.comp (single i)) : f = g :=
begin
refine pi_ext (λ i x, _),
convert linear_map.congr_fun (h i) x
end
lemma pi_ext'_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ i, f.comp (single i) = g.comp (single i) :=
⟨λ h i, h ▸ rfl, pi_ext'⟩
end ext
section
variables (R φ)
/-- If `I` and `J` are disjoint index sets, the product of the kernels of the `J`th projections of
`φ` is linearly equivalent to the product over `I`. -/
def infi_ker_proj_equiv {I J : set ι} [decidable_pred (λi, i ∈ I)]
(hd : disjoint I J) (hu : set.univ ⊆ I ∪ J) :
(⨅i ∈ J, ker (proj i) : submodule R (Πi, φ i)) ≃ₗ[R] (Πi:I, φ i) :=
begin
refine linear_equiv.of_linear
(pi $ λi, (proj (i:ι)).comp (submodule.subtype _))
(cod_restrict _ (pi $ λi, if h : i ∈ I then proj (⟨i, h⟩ : I) else 0) _) _ _,
{ assume b,
simp only [mem_infi, mem_ker, funext_iff, proj_apply, pi_apply],
assume j hjJ,
have : j ∉ I := assume hjI, hd ⟨hjI, hjJ⟩,
rw [dif_neg this, zero_apply] },
{ simp only [pi_comp, comp_assoc, subtype_comp_cod_restrict, proj_pi, subtype.coe_prop],
ext b ⟨j, hj⟩,
simp only [dif_pos, function.comp_app, function.eval_apply, linear_map.cod_restrict_apply,
linear_map.coe_comp, linear_map.coe_proj, linear_map.pi_apply, submodule.subtype_apply,
subtype.coe_prop], refl },
{ ext1 ⟨b, hb⟩,
apply subtype.ext,
ext j,
have hb : ∀i ∈ J, b i = 0,
{ simpa only [mem_infi, mem_ker, proj_apply] using (mem_infi _).1 hb },
simp only [comp_apply, pi_apply, id_apply, proj_apply, subtype_apply, cod_restrict_apply],
split_ifs,
{ refl },
{ exact (hb _ $ (hu trivial).resolve_left h).symm } }
end
end
section
variable [decidable_eq ι]
/-- `diag i j` is the identity map if `i = j`. Otherwise it is the constant 0 map. -/
def diag (i j : ι) : φ i →ₗ[R] φ j :=
@function.update ι (λj, φ i →ₗ[R] φ j) _ 0 i id j
lemma update_apply (f : Πi, M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) (c : M₂) (i j : ι) (b : M₂ →ₗ[R] φ i) :
(update f i b j) c = update (λi, f i c) i (b c) j :=
begin
by_cases j = i,
{ rw [h, update_same, update_same] },
{ rw [update_noteq h, update_noteq h] }
end
end
end linear_map
namespace submodule
variables [semiring R] {φ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, add_comm_monoid (φ i)] [∀ i, module R (φ i)]
open linear_map
/-- A version of `set.pi` for submodules. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`p : Π i, submodule R (φ i)`, `pi I s` is the submodule of dependent functions `f : Π i, φ i`
such that `f i` belongs to `p a` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
def pi (I : set ι) (p : Π i, submodule R (φ i)) : submodule R (Π i, φ i) :=
{ carrier := set.pi I (λ i, p i),
zero_mem' := λ i hi, (p i).zero_mem,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy i hi, (p i).add_mem (hx i hi) (hy i hi),
smul_mem' := λ c x hx i hi, (p i).smul_mem c (hx i hi) }
variables {I : set ι} {p q : Π i, submodule R (φ i)} {x : Π i, φ i}
@[simp] lemma mem_pi : x ∈ pi I p ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ p i := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pi : (pi I p : set (Π i, φ i)) = set.pi I (λ i, p i) := rfl
@[simp] lemma pi_empty (p : Π i, submodule R (φ i)) : pi ∅ p = ⊤ :=
set_like.coe_injective $ set.empty_pi _
@[simp] lemma pi_top (s : set ι) : pi s (λ i : ι, (⊤ : submodule R (φ i))) = ⊤ :=
set_like.coe_injective $ set.pi_univ _
lemma pi_mono {s : set ι} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, p i ≤ q i) : pi s p ≤ pi s q :=
set.pi_mono h
lemma binfi_comap_proj : (⨅ i ∈ I, comap (proj i) (p i)) = pi I p :=
by { ext x, simp }
lemma infi_comap_proj : (⨅ i, comap (proj i) (p i)) = pi set.univ p :=
by { ext x, simp }
lemma supr_map_single [decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] :
(⨆ i, map (linear_map.single i) (p i)) = pi set.univ p :=
begin
refine (supr_le $ λ i, _).antisymm _,
{ rintro _ ⟨x, hx : x ∈ p i, rfl⟩ j -,
rcases em (j = i) with rfl|hj; simp * },
{ intros x hx,
rw [← finset.univ_sum_single x],
exact sum_mem_supr (λ i, mem_map_of_mem (hx i trivial)) }
end
end submodule
namespace linear_equiv
variables [semiring R] {φ ψ χ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, add_comm_monoid (φ i)] [∀ i, module R (φ i)]
variables [∀ i, add_comm_monoid (ψ i)] [∀ i, module R (ψ i)]
variables [∀ i, add_comm_monoid (χ i)] [∀ i, module R (χ i)]
/-- Combine a family of linear equivalences into a linear equivalence of `pi`-types.
This is `equiv.Pi_congr_right` as a `linear_equiv` -/
@[simps apply] def Pi_congr_right (e : Π i, φ i ≃ₗ[R] ψ i) : (Π i, φ i) ≃ₗ[R] (Π i, ψ i) :=
{ to_fun := λ f i, e i (f i),
inv_fun := λ f i, (e i).symm (f i),
map_smul' := λ c f, by { ext, simp },
.. add_equiv.Pi_congr_right (λ j, (e j).to_add_equiv) }
@[simp]
lemma Pi_congr_right_refl : Pi_congr_right (λ j, refl R (φ j)) = refl _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Pi_congr_right_symm (e : Π i, φ i ≃ₗ[R] ψ i) :
(Pi_congr_right e).symm = (Pi_congr_right $ λ i, (e i).symm) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Pi_congr_right_trans (e : Π i, φ i ≃ₗ[R] ψ i) (f : Π i, ψ i ≃ₗ[R] χ i) :
(Pi_congr_right e).trans (Pi_congr_right f) = (Pi_congr_right $ λ i, (e i).trans (f i)) :=
rfl
variables (R φ)
/-- Transport dependent functions through an equivalence of the base space.
This is `equiv.Pi_congr_left'` as a `linear_equiv`. -/
@[simps {simp_rhs := tt}]
def Pi_congr_left' (e : ι ≃ ι') : (Π i', φ i') ≃ₗ[R] (Π i, φ $ e.symm i) :=
{ map_add' := λ x y, rfl, map_smul' := λ x y, rfl, .. equiv.Pi_congr_left' φ e }
/-- Transporting dependent functions through an equivalence of the base,
expressed as a "simplification".
This is `equiv.Pi_congr_left` as a `linear_equiv` -/
def Pi_congr_left (e : ι' ≃ ι) : (Π i', φ (e i')) ≃ₗ[R] (Π i, φ i) :=
(Pi_congr_left' R φ e.symm).symm
/-- This is `equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod` as a `linear_equiv` -/
def pi_option_equiv_prod {ι : Type*} {M : option ι → Type*}
[Π i, add_comm_group (M i)] [Π i, module R (M i)] :
(Π i : option ι, M i) ≃ₗ[R] (M none × Π i : ι, M (some i)) :=
{ map_add' := by simp [function.funext_iff],
map_smul' := by simp [function.funext_iff],
..equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod }
variables (ι R M) (S : Type*) [fintype ι] [decidable_eq ι] [semiring S]
[add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [module S M] [smul_comm_class R S M]
/-- Linear equivalence between linear functions `Rⁿ → M` and `Mⁿ`. The spaces `Rⁿ` and `Mⁿ`
are represented as `ι → R` and `ι → M`, respectively, where `ι` is a finite type.
This as an `S`-linear equivalence, under the assumption that `S` acts on `M` commuting with `R`.
When `R` is commutative, we can take this to be the usual action with `S = R`.
Otherwise, `S = ℕ` shows that the equivalence is additive.
See note [bundled maps over different rings]. -/
def pi_ring : ((ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) ≃ₗ[S] (ι → M) :=
(linear_map.lsum R (λ i : ι, R) S).symm.trans
(Pi_congr_right $ λ i, linear_map.ring_lmap_equiv_self R S M)
variables {ι R M}
@[simp] lemma pi_ring_apply (f : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) (i : ι) :
pi_ring R M ι S f i = f (pi.single i 1) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma pi_ring_symm_apply (f : ι → M) (g : ι → R) :
(pi_ring R M ι S).symm f g = ∑ i, g i • f i :=
by simp [pi_ring, linear_map.lsum]
/--
`equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow` as a linear equivalence.
-/
-- TODO additive version?
def sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow (α β R M : Type*) [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] :
((α ⊕ β) → M) ≃ₗ[R] (α → M) × (β → M) :=
{ map_add' := by { intros f g, ext; refl },
map_smul' := by { intros r f, ext; refl, },
.. equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow α β M, }
@[simp] lemma sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow_apply_fst {α β} (f : (α ⊕ β) → M) (a : α) :
(sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow α β R M f).1 a = f (sum.inl a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow_apply_snd {α β} (f : (α ⊕ β) → M) (b : β) :
(sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow α β R M f).2 b = f (sum.inr b) := rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow_symm_apply_inl {α β} (f : α → M) (g : β → M) (a : α) :
((sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow α β R M).symm (f, g)) (sum.inl a) = f a := rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow_symm_apply_inr {α β} (f : α → M) (g : β → M) (b : β) :
((sum_arrow_lequiv_prod_arrow α β R M).symm (f, g)) (sum.inr b) = g b := rfl
/-- If `ι` has a unique element, then `ι → M` is linearly equivalent to `M`. -/
@[simps { simp_rhs := tt, fully_applied := ff }]
def fun_unique (ι R M : Type*) [unique ι] [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] :
(ι → M) ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl,
.. equiv.fun_unique ι M }
variables (R M)
/-- Linear equivalence between dependent functions `Π i : fin 2, M i` and `M 0 × M 1`. -/
@[simps { simp_rhs := tt, fully_applied := ff }]
def pi_fin_two (M : fin 2 → Type v) [Π i, add_comm_monoid (M i)] [Π i, module R (M i)] :
(Π i, M i) ≃ₗ[R] M 0 × M 1 :=
{ map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl,
.. pi_fin_two_equiv M }
/-- Linear equivalence between vectors in `M² = fin 2 → M` and `M × M`. -/
@[simps { simp_rhs := tt, fully_applied := ff }]
def fin_two_arrow : (fin 2 → M) ≃ₗ[R] M × M :=
{ .. fin_two_arrow_equiv M, .. pi_fin_two R (λ _, M) }
end linear_equiv
section extend
variables (R) {η : Type x} [semiring R] (s : ι → η)
/-- `function.extend s f 0` as a bundled linear map. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def function.extend_by_zero.linear_map : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] (η → R) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, function.extend s f 0,
map_smul' := λ r f, by { simpa using function.extend_smul r s f 0 },
..function.extend_by_zero.hom R s }
end extend
/-! ### Bundled versions of `matrix.vec_cons` and `matrix.vec_empty`
The idea of these definitions is to be able to define a map as `x ↦ ![f₁ x, f₂ x, f₃ x]`, where
`f₁ f₂ f₃` are already linear maps, as `f₁.vec_cons $ f₂.vec_cons $ f₃.vec_cons $ vec_empty`.
While the same thing could be achieved using `linear_map.pi ![f₁, f₂, f₃]`, this is not
definitionally equal to the result using `linear_map.vec_cons`, as `fin.cases` and function
application do not commute definitionally.
Versions for when `f₁ f₂ f₃` are bilinear maps are also provided.
-/
section fin
section semiring
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
/-- The linear map defeq to `matrix.vec_empty` -/
def linear_map.vec_empty : M →ₗ[R] (fin 0 → M₃) :=
{ to_fun := λ m, matrix.vec_empty,
map_add' := λ x y, subsingleton.elim _ _,
map_smul' := λ r x, subsingleton.elim _ _ }
@[simp]
lemma linear_map.vec_empty_apply (m : M) :
(linear_map.vec_empty : M →ₗ[R] (fin 0 → M₃)) m = ![] := rfl
/-- A linear map into `fin n.succ → M₃` can be built out of a map into `M₃` and a map into
`fin n → M₃`. -/
def linear_map.vec_cons {n} (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] (fin n → M₂)) :
M →ₗ[R] (fin n.succ → M₂) :=
{ to_fun := λ m, matrix.vec_cons (f m) (g m),
map_add' := λ x y, begin
rw [f.map_add, g.map_add, matrix.cons_add_cons (f x)]
end,
map_smul' := λ c x, by rw [f.map_smul, g.map_smul, ring_hom.id_apply, matrix.smul_cons c (f x)] }
@[simp]
lemma linear_map.vec_cons_apply {n} (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] (fin n → M₂)) (m : M) :
f.vec_cons g m = matrix.vec_cons (f m) (g m) := rfl
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
variables [module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
/-- The empty bilinear map defeq to `matrix.vec_empty` -/
@[simps]
def linear_map.vec_empty₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] (fin 0 → M₃) :=
{ to_fun := λ m, linear_map.vec_empty,
map_add' := λ x y, linear_map.ext $ λ z, subsingleton.elim _ _,
map_smul' := λ r x, linear_map.ext $ λ z, subsingleton.elim _ _, }
/-- A bilinear map into `fin n.succ → M₃` can be built out of a map into `M₃` and a map into
`fin n → M₃` -/
@[simps]
def linear_map.vec_cons₂ {n} (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] (fin n → M₃)) :
M →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] (fin n.succ → M₃) :=
{ to_fun := λ m, linear_map.vec_cons (f m) (g m),
map_add' := λ x y, linear_map.ext $ λ z, by
simp only [f.map_add, g.map_add, linear_map.add_apply, linear_map.vec_cons_apply,
matrix.cons_add_cons (f x z)],
map_smul' := λ r x, linear_map.ext $ λ z, by simp [matrix.smul_cons r (f x z)], }
end comm_semiring
end fin
|
e4b9635ff3c939daec6674b3ae12b4422bc11c20 | 4b846d8dabdc64e7ea03552bad8f7fa74763fc67 | /library/init/meta/lean/parser.lean | 47e25699cb788fb47fa0a06689ae8b6408c9d559 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pacchiano/lean | 9324b33f3ac3b5c5647285160f9f6ea8d0d767dc | fdadada3a970377a6df8afcd629a6f2eab6e84e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,357,380,399 | 1,489,870,101,000 | 1,489,870,101,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,210 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import init.data.option.basic init.category.monad init.category.alternative
import init.meta.pexpr init.meta.interaction_monad
namespace lean
-- TODO: make inspectable (and pure)
meta constant parser_state : Type
meta constant parser_state.cur_pos : parser_state → pos
@[reducible] meta def parser := interaction_monad parser_state
@[reducible] meta def parser_result := interaction_monad.result parser_state
open interaction_monad
open interaction_monad.result
namespace parser
/-- Make sure the next token is an identifier, consume it, and
produce the quoted name `t, where t is the identifier. -/
meta constant ident : parser name
/-- Check that the next token is `tk` and consume it. `tk` must be a registered token. -/
meta constant tk (tk : string) : parser unit
/-- Parse an unelaborated expression using the given right-binding power. The expression
may contain antiquotations (`%%e`). -/
meta constant qexpr (rbp := nat.of_num std.prec.max) : parser pexpr
/-- Return the current parser position without consuming any input. -/
meta def cur_pos : parser pos := λ s, success (parser_state.cur_pos s) s
meta def parser_orelse {α : Type} (p₁ p₂ : parser α) : parser α :=
λ s,
let pos₁ := parser_state.cur_pos s in
result.cases_on (p₁ s)
success
(λ e₁ ref₁ s',
let pos₂ := parser_state.cur_pos s' in
if pos₁ ≠ pos₂ then
exception e₁ ref₁ s'
else result.cases_on (p₂ s)
success
exception)
meta instance : alternative parser :=
{ interaction_monad.monad with
failure := @interaction_monad.failed _,
orelse := @parser_orelse }
-- TODO: move
meta def {u v} many {f : Type u → Type v} [monad f] [alternative f] {a : Type u} : f a → f (list a)
| x := (do y ← x,
ys ← many x,
return $ y::ys) <|> pure list.nil
local postfix `?`:100 := optional
local postfix * := many
meta def sep_by {α : Type} : string → parser α → parser (list α)
| s p := (list.cons <$> p <*> (tk s *> p)*) <|> return []
end parser
end lean
|
477d3f1ad220e20f2e9d80a73cef6646d9c10f3a | 56af0912bd25910f5caae91d6dd0603b0c032989 | /src/complex/kb_solutions/Level_02_I.lean | b60157c5eae0e0d077f3ba399ba6d8cc1bb57435 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | isabella232/complex-number-game | ae36e0b1df9761d9df07049ca29c91ae44dbdc2d | 3d767f14041f9002e435bed3a3527fdd297c166d | refs/heads/master | 1,679,305,953,116 | 1,606,397,567,000 | 1,606,397,567,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,634 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 The Xena project. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Kevin Buzzard
Thanks: Imperial College London, leanprover-community
-/
-- import level 1
import complex.kb_solutions.Level_01_of_real
/-!
# Level 2: I
I find it unbelievable that we have written quite a lot of code about the
complex numbers and we've still never defined i, or j, or I, or $$\sqrt{-1}$$,
or whatever it's called. Why don't you supply the definition, and make the
basic API?
All the proofs below are sorried. You can try them in tactic mode
by replacing `sorry` with `begin end` and then starting to write
tactics in the `begin end` block.
-/
namespace complex
/-- complex.I is the square root of -1 above the imaginary axis -/
def I : ℂ := ⟨0, 1⟩
/-
Easy lemmas, tagged with `simp` so Lean can prove things about `I` by equating
real and imaginary parts.
-/
/-- re(I) = 0 -/
@[simp] lemma I_re : re(I) = 0 :=
begin
refl
end
/-- im(I) = 1 -/
@[simp] lemma I_im : im(I) = 1 := rfl
--local attribute [simp] ext_iff
/-- I*I = -1 -/
@[simp] lemma I_mul_I : I * I = -1 :=
begin
ext;
simp
end
lemma mk_eq_add_mul_I (a b : ℝ) : (⟨a, b⟩ : ℂ) = a + b * I :=
begin
ext;
simp
end
@[simp] lemma re_add_im (z : ℂ) : (z.re : ℂ) + z.im * I = z :=
begin
ext; simp
end
/-
Bonus level. Hint: don't forget ext_iff. It's defined
in complex.basic and its type is below.
ext_iff : ∀ {z w : ℂ}, z = w ↔ z.re = w.re ∧ z.im = w.im
-/
/-- I is non-zero -/
lemma I_ne_zero : (I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
begin
simp [ext_iff]
end
end complex
|
7a416d5b5005fcfa03c6d57b02f9d5197548485d | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/29.lean | a95ebdf91a3faf9a99b97a3699decbcdf36c27a7 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 105 | lean |
def foo : Nat -> Nat -> Nat -> List Nat
| _, _, 0 => [1]
| 0, _, _ => [2]
| n, d, k+1 => foo n d k
|
2fd00c732373284d2f7e4e29ae041756b7811f99 | b73bd2854495d87ad5ce4f247cfcd6faa7e71c7e | /src/game/world4/level1.lean | bcbc1353cf930d8c3e02331985bdc6d4aeea0dad | [] | no_license | agusakov/category-theory-game | 20db0b26270e0c95a3d5605498570273d72f731d | 652dd7e90ae706643b2a597e2c938403653e167d | refs/heads/master | 1,669,201,216,310 | 1,595,740,057,000 | 1,595,740,057,000 | 280,895,295 | 12 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,649 | lean | import category_theory.category.default
import category_theory.functor
import category_theory.isomorphism
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂ -- The order in this declaration matters: v often needs to be explicitly specified while u often can be omitted
namespace category_theory
variables (C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C]
variables (D : Type u₂) [category.{v₂} D]
/-
# Functor world
## Level 1: Definition of functor
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` between categories `C` and `D` consists of
* an object `F.obj X ∈ D` for all objects `X ∈ C`
* a morphism `Ff : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y` for each morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`, where the domain and codomain of `Ff` are, respectively, equal to `F` applied to the domain and codomain of `f`.
The assignments are required to satisfy the following two functoriality axioms:
* for any composable pair of morphisms `f, g` in `C`, `F.map f ≫ F.map g = F.map (f ≫ g)`.
* for each object `X` in `C`, `F.map (𝟙 X) : 𝟙 (F.obj X)`.
In other words, a functor consists of a mapping on objects and a mapping on morphisms that preserves all of the structure of a category, namely domains and codomains, composition, and identities.
-/
/- Axiom :
F.map f ≫ F.map g = F.map (f ≫ g)-/
/- Axiom:
F.map (𝟙 X) : 𝟙 (F.obj X)-/
/- Lemma
If $$f : X ⟶ Y$$ and $$g : X ⟶ Y$$ are monomorphisms, then $$f ≫ g : X ⟶ Z$$ is a monomorphism.
-/
lemma map_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [epi (f ≫ g)] : epi g :=
begin
split,
intros W h l hyp,
rw ← cancel_epi (f ≫ g),
rw category.assoc,
rw hyp,
rw ← category.assoc,
end
end category_theory |
6b4ff92e1f41e63c06bf5167ebe1d68901d90dd0 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/algebra/group/inj_surj.lean | 64bb225bdc0c3cf80c757753c28af4bfc07adbef | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,133 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.algebra.group.defs
import Mathlib.logic.function.basic
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Lifting algebraic data classes along injective/surjective maps
This file provides definitions that are meant to deal with
situations such as the following:
Suppose that `G` is a group, and `H` is a type endowed with
`has_one H`, `has_mul H`, and `has_inv H`.
Suppose furthermore, that `f : G → H` is a surjective map
that respects the multiplication, and the unit elements.
Then `H` satisfies the group axioms.
The relevant definition in this case is `function.surjective.group`.
Dually, there is also `function.injective.group`.
And there are versions for (additive) (commutative) semigroups/monoids.
-/
namespace function
/-!
### Injective
-/
namespace injective
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `*` to a semigroup. -/
protected def add_semigroup {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₁] [add_semigroup M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_semigroup M₁ :=
add_semigroup.mk Add.add sorry
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a commutative semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `*` to a commutative semigroup. -/
protected def comm_semigroup {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Mul M₁] [comm_semigroup M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x * y) = f x * f y) : comm_semigroup M₁ :=
comm_semigroup.mk semigroup.mul sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a left cancel semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `*` to a left cancel semigroup. -/
protected def add_left_cancel_semigroup {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₁] [add_left_cancel_semigroup M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_left_cancel_semigroup M₁ :=
add_left_cancel_semigroup.mk Add.add sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a right cancel semigroup,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `*` to a right cancel semigroup. -/
protected def right_cancel_semigroup {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Mul M₁] [right_cancel_semigroup M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x * y) = f x * f y) : right_cancel_semigroup M₁ :=
right_cancel_semigroup.mk Mul.mul sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a monoid. -/
protected def add_monoid {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₁] [HasZero M₁] [add_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_monoid M₁ :=
add_monoid.mk add_semigroup.add sorry 0 sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a left cancel monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a left cancel monoid. -/
protected def add_left_cancel_monoid {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₁] [HasZero M₁] [add_left_cancel_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_left_cancel_monoid M₁ :=
add_left_cancel_monoid.mk add_left_cancel_semigroup.add sorry sorry add_monoid.zero sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a commutative monoid,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1` and `*` to a commutative monoid. -/
protected def add_comm_monoid {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₁] [HasZero M₁] [add_comm_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_comm_monoid M₁ :=
add_comm_monoid.mk add_comm_semigroup.add sorry add_monoid.zero sorry sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` is a `div_inv_monoid`
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` to a `div_inv_monoid`. -/
protected def div_inv_monoid {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Mul M₁] [HasOne M₁] [has_inv M₁] [Div M₁] [div_inv_monoid M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (x⁻¹) = (f x⁻¹)) (div : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x / y) = f x / f y) : div_inv_monoid M₁ :=
div_inv_monoid.mk monoid.mul sorry monoid.one sorry sorry has_inv.inv Div.div
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` is a group,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` to a group. -/
protected def group {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Mul M₁] [HasOne M₁] [has_inv M₁] [group M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (x⁻¹) = (f x⁻¹)) : group M₁ :=
group.mk monoid.mul sorry monoid.one sorry sorry has_inv.inv
(div_inv_monoid.div._default monoid.mul sorry monoid.one sorry sorry has_inv.inv) sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹` and `/` is a group,
if it admits an injective map to a group that preserves these operations.
This version of `injective.group` makes sure that the `/` operation is defeq
to the specified division operator.
-/
protected def add_group_sub {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₁] [HasZero M₁] [Neg M₁] [Sub M₁] [add_group M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (-x) = -f x) (div : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x - y) = f x - f y) : add_group M₁ :=
add_group.mk sub_neg_monoid.add sorry sub_neg_monoid.zero sorry sorry sub_neg_monoid.neg sub_neg_monoid.sub sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` is a commutative group,
if it admits an injective map that preserves `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` to a commutative group. -/
protected def comm_group {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Mul M₁] [HasOne M₁] [has_inv M₁] [comm_group M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (x⁻¹) = (f x⁻¹)) : comm_group M₁ :=
comm_group.mk comm_monoid.mul sorry comm_monoid.one sorry sorry group.inv group.div sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹` and `/` is a commutative group,
if it admits an injective map to a commutative group that preserves these operations.
This version of `injective.comm_group` makes sure that the `/` operation is defeq
to the specified division operator.
-/
protected def comm_group_div {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Mul M₁] [HasOne M₁] [has_inv M₁] [Div M₁] [comm_group M₂] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : injective f) (one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (x⁻¹) = (f x⁻¹)) (div : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x / y) = f x / f y) : comm_group M₁ :=
comm_group.mk comm_monoid.mul sorry comm_monoid.one sorry sorry group.inv group.div sorry sorry
end injective
/-!
### Surjective
-/
namespace surjective
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a semigroup,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `*` from a semigroup. -/
protected def add_semigroup {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₂] [add_semigroup M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_semigroup M₂ :=
add_semigroup.mk Add.add sorry
/-- A type endowed with `*` is a commutative semigroup,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `*` from a commutative semigroup. -/
protected def add_comm_semigroup {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₂] [add_comm_semigroup M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_comm_semigroup M₂ :=
add_comm_semigroup.mk add_semigroup.add sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a monoid,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1` and `*` from a monoid. -/
protected def add_monoid {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₂] [HasZero M₂] [add_monoid M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_monoid M₂ :=
add_monoid.mk add_semigroup.add sorry 0 sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1` and `*` is a commutative monoid,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1` and `*` from a commutative monoid. -/
protected def add_comm_monoid {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₂] [HasZero M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) : add_comm_monoid M₂ :=
add_comm_monoid.mk add_comm_semigroup.add sorry add_monoid.zero sorry sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` is a group,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` from a group. -/
protected def group {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Mul M₂] [HasOne M₂] [has_inv M₂] [group M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (x⁻¹) = (f x⁻¹)) : group M₂ :=
group.mk monoid.mul sorry monoid.one sorry sorry has_inv.inv
(div_inv_monoid.div._default monoid.mul sorry monoid.one sorry sorry has_inv.inv) sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` is a `div_inv_monoid`,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1`, `*`, `⁻¹`, and `/` from a `div_inv_monoid` -/
protected def sub_neg_add_monoid {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₂] [HasZero M₂] [Neg M₂] [Sub M₂] [sub_neg_monoid M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (-x) = -f x) (div : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x - y) = f x - f y) : sub_neg_monoid M₂ :=
sub_neg_monoid.mk add_monoid.add sorry add_monoid.zero sorry sorry Neg.neg Sub.sub
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹` and `/` is a group,
if it admits an surjective map from a group that preserves these operations.
This version of `surjective.group` makes sure that the `/` operation is defeq
to the specified division operator.
-/
protected def add_group_sub {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₂] [HasZero M₂] [Neg M₂] [Sub M₂] [add_group M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (-x) = -f x) (div : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x - y) = f x - f y) : add_group M₂ :=
add_group.mk sub_neg_monoid.add sorry sub_neg_monoid.zero sorry sorry sub_neg_monoid.neg sub_neg_monoid.sub sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` is a commutative group,
if it admits a surjective map that preserves `1`, `*` and `⁻¹` from a commutative group. -/
protected def comm_group {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Mul M₂] [HasOne M₂] [has_inv M₂] [comm_group M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (x⁻¹) = (f x⁻¹)) : comm_group M₂ :=
comm_group.mk comm_monoid.mul sorry comm_monoid.one sorry sorry group.inv group.div sorry sorry
/-- A type endowed with `1`, `*`, `⁻¹` and `/` is a commutative group,
if it admits an surjective map from a commutative group that preserves these operations.
This version of `surjective.comm_group` makes sure that the `/` operation is defeq
to the specified division operator.
-/
protected def add_comm_group_sub {M₁ : Type u_1} {M₂ : Type u_2} [Add M₂] [HasZero M₂] [Neg M₂] [Sub M₂] [add_comm_group M₁] (f : M₁ → M₂) (hf : surjective f) (one : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x + y) = f x + f y) (inv : ∀ (x : M₁), f (-x) = -f x) (div : ∀ (x y : M₁), f (x - y) = f x - f y) : add_comm_group M₂ :=
add_comm_group.mk add_comm_monoid.add sorry add_comm_monoid.zero sorry sorry add_group.neg add_group.sub sorry sorry
|
21d80be300ff5bf07d10149ea8a59d809e958ed8 | c3f2fcd060adfa2ca29f924839d2d925e8f2c685 | /library/logic/axioms/funext.lean | 54d5687bc3031caecf14daf664503565ac3a0f76 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | respu/lean | 6582d19a2f2838a28ecd2b3c6f81c32d07b5341d | 8c76419c60b63d0d9f7bc04ebb0b99812d0ec654 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,882,451,231 | 1,427,747,084,000 | 1,427,747,429,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,127 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Module: logic.axioms.funext
Author: Leonardo de Moura
Function extensionality.
-/
import logic.cast algebra.function data.sigma
open function eq.ops
axiom funext : ∀ {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {f g : Π a, B a} (H : ∀ a, f a = g a), f = g
namespace function
variables {A B C D: Type}
theorem compose.assoc (f : C → D) (g : B → C) (h : A → B) : (f ∘ g) ∘ h = f ∘ (g ∘ h) :=
funext (take x, rfl)
theorem compose.left_id (f : A → B) : id ∘ f = f :=
funext (take x, rfl)
theorem compose.right_id (f : A → B) : f ∘ id = f :=
funext (take x, rfl)
theorem compose_const_right (f : B → C) (b : B) : f ∘ (const A b) = const A (f b) :=
funext (take x, rfl)
theorem hfunext {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {B' : A → Type} {f : Π x, B x} {g : Π x, B' x}
(H : ∀ a, f a == g a) : f == g :=
let HH : B = B' := (funext (λ x, heq.type_eq (H x))) in
cast_to_heq (funext (λ a, heq.to_eq (heq.trans (cast_app HH f a) (H a))))
end function
|
888c9b8b06ef2dc53038b30eaaf26a84f690c3ce | 2eab05920d6eeb06665e1a6df77b3157354316ad | /src/algebraic_geometry/sheafed_space.lean | 4ea40462ab027cc6d891967c01d578524d770394 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ayush1801/mathlib | 78949b9f789f488148142221606bf15c02b960d2 | ce164e28f262acbb3de6281b3b03660a9f744e3c | refs/heads/master | 1,692,886,907,941 | 1,635,270,866,000 | 1,635,270,866,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,921 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebraic_geometry.presheafed_space
import topology.sheaves.sheaf
/-!
# Sheafed spaces
Introduces the category of topological spaces equipped with a sheaf (taking values in an
arbitrary target category `C`.)
We further describe how to apply functors and natural transformations to the values of the
presheaves.
-/
universes v u
open category_theory
open Top
open topological_space
open opposite
open category_theory.limits
open category_theory.category category_theory.functor
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C] [limits.has_products C]
local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
namespace algebraic_geometry
/-- A `SheafedSpace C` is a topological space equipped with a sheaf of `C`s. -/
structure SheafedSpace extends PresheafedSpace C :=
(is_sheaf : presheaf.is_sheaf)
variables {C}
namespace SheafedSpace
instance coe_carrier : has_coe (SheafedSpace C) Top :=
{ coe := λ X, X.carrier }
/-- Extract the `sheaf C (X : Top)` from a `SheafedSpace C`. -/
def sheaf (X : SheafedSpace C) : sheaf C (X : Top.{v}) := ⟨X.presheaf, X.is_sheaf⟩
@[simp] lemma as_coe (X : SheafedSpace C) : X.carrier = (X : Top.{v}) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_coe (carrier) (presheaf) (h) :
(({ carrier := carrier, presheaf := presheaf, is_sheaf := h } : SheafedSpace.{v} C) :
Top.{v}) = carrier :=
rfl
instance (X : SheafedSpace.{v} C) : topological_space X := X.carrier.str
/-- The trivial `punit` valued sheaf on any topological space. -/
def punit (X : Top) : SheafedSpace (discrete punit) :=
{ is_sheaf := presheaf.is_sheaf_punit _,
..@PresheafedSpace.const (discrete punit) _ X punit.star }
instance : inhabited (SheafedSpace (discrete _root_.punit)) := ⟨punit (Top.of pempty)⟩
instance : category (SheafedSpace C) :=
show category (induced_category (PresheafedSpace C) SheafedSpace.to_PresheafedSpace),
by apply_instance
/-- Forgetting the sheaf condition is a functor from `SheafedSpace C` to `PresheafedSpace C`. -/
@[derive [full, faithful]]
def forget_to_PresheafedSpace : (SheafedSpace C) ⥤ (PresheafedSpace C) :=
induced_functor _
variables {C}
section
local attribute [simp] id comp
@[simp] lemma id_base (X : SheafedSpace C) :
((𝟙 X) : X ⟶ X).base = (𝟙 (X : Top.{v})) := rfl
lemma id_c (X : SheafedSpace C) :
((𝟙 X) : X ⟶ X).c =
(((functor.left_unitor _).inv) ≫
(whisker_right (nat_trans.op (opens.map_id (X.carrier)).hom) _)) := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_c_app (X : SheafedSpace C) (U) :
((𝟙 X) : X ⟶ X).c.app U = eq_to_hom (by { induction U using opposite.rec, cases U, refl }) :=
by { induction U using opposite.rec, cases U, simp only [id_c], dsimp, simp, }
@[simp] lemma comp_base {X Y Z : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g).base = f.base ≫ g.base := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_c_app {X Y Z : SheafedSpace C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (β : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(α ≫ β).c.app U = (β.c).app U ≫ (α.c).app (op ((opens.map (β.base)).obj (unop U))) ≫
(Top.presheaf.pushforward.comp _ _ _).inv.app U := rfl
variables (C)
/-- The forgetful functor from `SheafedSpace` to `Top`. -/
def forget : SheafedSpace C ⥤ Top :=
{ obj := λ X, (X : Top.{v}),
map := λ X Y f, f.base }
end
open Top.presheaf
/--
The restriction of a sheafed space along an open embedding into the space.
-/
def restrict {U : Top} (X : SheafedSpace C)
(f : U ⟶ (X : Top.{v})) (h : open_embedding f) : SheafedSpace C :=
{ is_sheaf := λ ι 𝒰, ⟨is_limit.of_iso_limit
((is_limit.postcompose_inv_equiv _ _).inv_fun (X.is_sheaf _).some)
(sheaf_condition_equalizer_products.fork.iso_of_open_embedding h 𝒰).symm⟩,
..X.to_PresheafedSpace.restrict f h }
/--
The restriction of a sheafed space `X` to the top subspace is isomorphic to `X` itself.
-/
def restrict_top_iso (X : SheafedSpace C) :
X.restrict (opens.inclusion ⊤) (opens.open_embedding ⊤) ≅ X :=
@preimage_iso _ _ _ _ forget_to_PresheafedSpace _ _
(X.restrict (opens.inclusion ⊤) (opens.open_embedding ⊤)) _
X.to_PresheafedSpace.restrict_top_iso
/--
The global sections, notated Gamma.
-/
def Γ : (SheafedSpace C)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C :=
forget_to_PresheafedSpace.op ⋙ PresheafedSpace.Γ
lemma Γ_def : (Γ : _ ⥤ C) = forget_to_PresheafedSpace.op ⋙ PresheafedSpace.Γ := rfl
@[simp] lemma Γ_obj (X : (SheafedSpace C)ᵒᵖ) : Γ.obj X = (unop X).presheaf.obj (op ⊤) := rfl
lemma Γ_obj_op (X : SheafedSpace C) : Γ.obj (op X) = X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤) := rfl
@[simp] lemma Γ_map {X Y : (SheafedSpace C)ᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Γ.map f = f.unop.c.app (op ⊤) ≫ (unop Y).presheaf.map (opens.le_map_top _ _).op := rfl
lemma Γ_map_op {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Γ.map f.op = f.c.app (op ⊤) ≫ X.presheaf.map (opens.le_map_top _ _).op := rfl
end SheafedSpace
end algebraic_geometry
|
1955e9cbae3377e1a587520f58e7a3f399281411 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/group_theory/perm/sign_auto.lean | 502875881869adeae226d65bafb910941894d798 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,273 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.fintype.basic
import Mathlib.data.finset.sort
import Mathlib.group_theory.perm.basic
import Mathlib.group_theory.order_of_element
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u u_1 v
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Sign of a permutation
The main definition of this file is `equiv.perm.sign`, associating a `units ℤ` sign with a
permutation.
This file also contains miscellaneous lemmas about `equiv.perm` and `equiv.swap`, building on top
of those in `data/equiv/basic` and `data/equiv/perm`.
-/
namespace equiv.perm
/--
`mod_swap i j` contains permutations up to swapping `i` and `j`.
We use this to partition permutations in `matrix.det_zero_of_row_eq`, such that each partition
sums up to `0`.
-/
def mod_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] (i : α) (j : α) : setoid (perm α) :=
setoid.mk (fun (σ τ : perm α) => σ = τ ∨ σ = swap i j * τ) sorry
protected instance r.decidable_rel {α : Type u_1} [fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (i : α) (j : α) :
DecidableRel setoid.r :=
fun (σ τ : perm α) => or.decidable
/-- If the permutation `f` fixes the subtype `{x // p x}`, then this returns the permutation
on `{x // p x}` induced by `f`. -/
def subtype_perm {α : Type u} (f : perm α) {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ (x : α), p x ↔ p (coe_fn f x)) :
perm (Subtype fun (x : α) => p x) :=
mk (fun (x : Subtype fun (x : α) => p x) => { val := coe_fn f ↑x, property := sorry })
(fun (x : Subtype fun (x : α) => p x) => { val := coe_fn (f⁻¹) ↑x, property := sorry }) sorry
sorry
@[simp] theorem subtype_perm_one {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (h : ∀ (x : α), p x ↔ p (coe_fn 1 x)) :
subtype_perm 1 h = 1 :=
sorry
/-- The inclusion map of permutations on a subtype of `α` into permutations of `α`,
fixing the other points. -/
def of_subtype {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] : perm (Subtype p) →* perm α :=
monoid_hom.mk
(fun (f : perm (Subtype p)) =>
mk
(fun (x : α) =>
dite (p x) (fun (h : p x) => ↑(coe_fn f { val := x, property := h })) fun (h : ¬p x) => x)
(fun (x : α) =>
dite (p x) (fun (h : p x) => ↑(coe_fn (f⁻¹) { val := x, property := h }))
fun (h : ¬p x) => x)
sorry sorry)
sorry sorry
/-- Two permutations `f` and `g` are `disjoint` if their supports are disjoint, i.e.,
every element is fixed either by `f`, or by `g`. -/
def disjoint {α : Type u} (f : perm α) (g : perm α) := ∀ (x : α), coe_fn f x = x ∨ coe_fn g x = x
theorem disjoint.symm {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {g : perm α} : disjoint f g → disjoint g f := sorry
theorem disjoint_comm {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {g : perm α} : disjoint f g ↔ disjoint g f :=
{ mp := disjoint.symm, mpr := disjoint.symm }
theorem disjoint.mul_comm {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {g : perm α} (h : disjoint f g) :
f * g = g * f :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem disjoint_one_left {α : Type u} (f : perm α) : disjoint 1 f :=
fun (_x : α) => Or.inl rfl
@[simp] theorem disjoint_one_right {α : Type u} (f : perm α) : disjoint f 1 :=
fun (_x : α) => Or.inr rfl
theorem disjoint.mul_left {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {g : perm α} {h : perm α} (H1 : disjoint f h)
(H2 : disjoint g h) : disjoint (f * g) h :=
sorry
theorem disjoint.mul_right {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {g : perm α} {h : perm α} (H1 : disjoint f g)
(H2 : disjoint f h) : disjoint f (g * h) :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (disjoint f (g * h))) (propext disjoint_comm)))
(disjoint.mul_left (disjoint.symm H1) (disjoint.symm H2))
theorem disjoint_prod_right {α : Type u} {f : perm α} (l : List (perm α))
(h : ∀ (g : perm α), g ∈ l → disjoint f g) : disjoint f (list.prod l) :=
sorry
theorem disjoint_prod_perm {α : Type u} {l₁ : List (perm α)} {l₂ : List (perm α)}
(hl : list.pairwise disjoint l₁) (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) : list.prod l₁ = list.prod l₂ :=
list.perm.prod_eq' hp (list.pairwise.imp (fun (f g : perm α) => disjoint.mul_comm) hl)
theorem of_subtype_subtype_perm {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(h₁ : ∀ (x : α), p x ↔ p (coe_fn f x)) (h₂ : ∀ (x : α), coe_fn f x ≠ x → p x) :
coe_fn of_subtype (subtype_perm f h₁) = f :=
sorry
theorem of_subtype_apply_of_not_mem {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(f : perm (Subtype p)) {x : α} (hx : ¬p x) : coe_fn (coe_fn of_subtype f) x = x :=
dif_neg hx
theorem mem_iff_of_subtype_apply_mem {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(f : perm (Subtype p)) (x : α) : p x ↔ p (coe_fn (coe_fn of_subtype f) x) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem subtype_perm_of_subtype {α : Type u} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(f : perm (Subtype p)) :
subtype_perm (coe_fn of_subtype f) (mem_iff_of_subtype_apply_mem f) = f :=
sorry
theorem pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {x : α} (hfx : coe_fn f x = x)
(n : ℕ) : coe_fn (f ^ n) x = x :=
sorry
theorem gpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {x : α} (hfx : coe_fn f x = x)
(n : ℤ) : coe_fn (f ^ n) x = x :=
sorry
theorem pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {x : α}
(hffx : coe_fn f (coe_fn f x) = x) (n : ℕ) :
coe_fn (f ^ n) x = x ∨ coe_fn (f ^ n) x = coe_fn f x :=
sorry
theorem gpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {α : Type u} {f : perm α} {x : α}
(hffx : coe_fn f (coe_fn f x) = x) (i : ℤ) :
coe_fn (f ^ i) x = x ∨ coe_fn (f ^ i) x = coe_fn f x :=
sorry
/-- The `finset` of nonfixed points of a permutation. -/
def support {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (f : perm α) : finset α :=
finset.filter (fun (x : α) => coe_fn f x ≠ x) finset.univ
@[simp] theorem mem_support {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {f : perm α} {x : α} :
x ∈ support f ↔ coe_fn f x ≠ x :=
sorry
/-- `f.is_swap` indicates that the permutation `f` is a transposition of two elements. -/
def is_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] (f : perm α) := ∃ (x : α), ∃ (y : α), x ≠ y ∧ f = swap x y
theorem is_swap.of_subtype_is_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{f : perm (Subtype p)} (h : is_swap f) : is_swap (coe_fn of_subtype f) :=
sorry
theorem ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] {f : perm α} {x : α}
{y : α} (hy : coe_fn (swap x (coe_fn f x) * f) y ≠ y) : coe_fn f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x :=
sorry
theorem support_swap_mul_eq {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {f : perm α} {x : α}
(hffx : coe_fn f (coe_fn f x) ≠ x) :
support (swap x (coe_fn f x) * f) = finset.erase (support f) x :=
sorry
theorem card_support_swap_mul {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {f : perm α} {x : α}
(hx : coe_fn f x ≠ x) :
finset.card (support (swap x (coe_fn f x) * f)) < finset.card (support f) :=
sorry
/-- Given a list `l : list α` and a permutation `f : perm α` such that the nonfixed points of `f`
are in `l`, recursively factors `f` as a product of transpositions. -/
def swap_factors_aux {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (f : perm α) :
(∀ {x : α}, coe_fn f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) →
Subtype fun (l : List (perm α)) => list.prod l = f ∧ ∀ (g : perm α), g ∈ l → is_swap g :=
sorry
/-- `swap_factors` represents a permutation as a product of a list of transpositions.
The representation is non unique and depends on the linear order structure.
For types without linear order `trunc_swap_factors` can be used. -/
def swap_factors {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] [linear_order α] (f : perm α) :
Subtype fun (l : List (perm α)) => list.prod l = f ∧ ∀ (g : perm α), g ∈ l → is_swap g :=
swap_factors_aux (finset.sort LessEq finset.univ) f sorry
/-- This computably represents the fact that any permutation can be represented as the product of
a list of transpositions. -/
def trunc_swap_factors {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (f : perm α) :
trunc
(Subtype fun (l : List (perm α)) => list.prod l = f ∧ ∀ (g : perm α), g ∈ l → is_swap g) :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton (finset.val finset.univ)
(fun (l : List α) (h : ∀ (x : α), coe_fn f x ≠ x → x ∈ quotient.mk l) =>
trunc.mk (swap_factors_aux l f h))
sorry
/-- An induction principle for permutations. If `P` holds for the identity permutation, and
is preserved under composition with a non-trivial swap, then `P` holds for all permutations. -/
theorem swap_induction_on {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {P : perm α → Prop}
(f : perm α) : P 1 → (∀ (f : perm α) (x y : α), x ≠ y → P f → P (swap x y * f)) → P f :=
sorry
/-- Like `swap_induction_on`, but with the composition on the right of `f`.
An induction principle for permutations. If `P` holds for the identity permutation, and
is preserved under composition with a non-trivial swap, then `P` holds for all permutations. -/
theorem swap_induction_on' {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {P : perm α → Prop}
(f : perm α) : P 1 → (∀ (f : perm α) (x y : α), x ≠ y → P f → P (f * swap x y)) → P f :=
fun (h1 : P 1) (IH : ∀ (f : perm α) (x y : α), x ≠ y → P f → P (f * swap x y)) =>
inv_inv f ▸ swap_induction_on (f⁻¹) h1 fun (f : perm α) => IH (f⁻¹)
theorem is_conj_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] {w : α} {x : α} {y : α} {z : α} (hwx : w ≠ x)
(hyz : y ≠ z) : is_conj (swap w x) (swap y z) :=
sorry
/-- set of all pairs (⟨a, b⟩ : Σ a : fin n, fin n) such that b < a -/
def fin_pairs_lt (n : ℕ) : finset (sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n) :=
finset.sigma finset.univ fun (a : fin n) => finset.attach_fin (finset.range ↑a) sorry
theorem mem_fin_pairs_lt {n : ℕ} {a : sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n} :
a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n ↔ sigma.snd a < sigma.fst a :=
sorry
/-- `sign_aux σ` is the sign of a permutation on `fin n`, defined as the parity of the number of
pairs `(x₁, x₂)` such that `x₂ < x₁` but `σ x₁ ≤ σ x₂` -/
def sign_aux {n : ℕ} (a : perm (fin n)) : units ℤ :=
finset.prod (fin_pairs_lt n)
fun (x : sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n) =>
ite (coe_fn a (sigma.fst x) ≤ coe_fn a (sigma.snd x)) (-1) 1
@[simp] theorem sign_aux_one (n : ℕ) : sign_aux 1 = 1 := sorry
/-- `sign_bij_aux f ⟨a, b⟩` returns the pair consisting of `f a` and `f b` in decreasing order. -/
def sign_bij_aux {n : ℕ} (f : perm (fin n)) (a : sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n) :
sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n :=
dite (coe_fn f (sigma.snd a) < coe_fn f (sigma.fst a))
(fun (hxa : coe_fn f (sigma.snd a) < coe_fn f (sigma.fst a)) =>
sigma.mk (coe_fn f (sigma.fst a)) (coe_fn f (sigma.snd a)))
fun (hxa : ¬coe_fn f (sigma.snd a) < coe_fn f (sigma.fst a)) =>
sigma.mk (coe_fn f (sigma.snd a)) (coe_fn f (sigma.fst a))
theorem sign_bij_aux_inj {n : ℕ} {f : perm (fin n)} (a : sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n)
(b : sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n) :
a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n → b ∈ fin_pairs_lt n → sign_bij_aux f a = sign_bij_aux f b → a = b :=
sorry
theorem sign_bij_aux_surj {n : ℕ} {f : perm (fin n)} (a : sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n)
(H : a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n) :
∃ (b : sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n), ∃ (H : b ∈ fin_pairs_lt n), a = sign_bij_aux f b :=
sorry
theorem sign_bij_aux_mem {n : ℕ} {f : perm (fin n)} (a : sigma fun (a : fin n) => fin n) :
a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n → sign_bij_aux f a ∈ fin_pairs_lt n :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem sign_aux_inv {n : ℕ} (f : perm (fin n)) : sign_aux (f⁻¹) = sign_aux f := sorry
theorem sign_aux_mul {n : ℕ} (f : perm (fin n)) (g : perm (fin n)) :
sign_aux (f * g) = sign_aux f * sign_aux g :=
sorry
-- TODO: slow
theorem sign_aux_swap {n : ℕ} {x : fin n} {y : fin n} (hxy : x ≠ y) : sign_aux (swap x y) = -1 :=
sorry
/-- When the list `l : list α` contains all nonfixed points of the permutation `f : perm α`,
`sign_aux2 l f` recursively calculates the sign of `f`. -/
def sign_aux2 {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] : List α → perm α → units ℤ := sorry
theorem sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} (l : List α) (f : perm α)
(e : α ≃ fin n) (h : ∀ (x : α), coe_fn f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) :
sign_aux (equiv.trans (equiv.trans (equiv.symm e) f) e) = sign_aux2 l f :=
sorry
/-- When the multiset `s : multiset α` contains all nonfixed points of the permutation `f : perm α`,
`sign_aux2 f _` recursively calculates the sign of `f`. -/
def sign_aux3 {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (f : perm α) {s : multiset α} :
(∀ (x : α), x ∈ s) → units ℤ :=
quotient.hrec_on s (fun (l : List α) (h : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ quotient.mk l) => sign_aux2 l f) sorry
theorem sign_aux3_mul_and_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (f : perm α) (g : perm α)
(s : multiset α) (hs : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s) :
sign_aux3 (f * g) hs = sign_aux3 f hs * sign_aux3 g hs ∧
∀ (x y : α), x ≠ y → sign_aux3 (swap x y) hs = -1 :=
sorry
/-- `sign` of a permutation returns the signature or parity of a permutation, `1` for even
permutations, `-1` for odd permutations. It is the unique surjective group homomorphism from
`perm α` to the group with two elements.-/
def sign {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] : perm α →* units ℤ :=
monoid_hom.mk' (fun (f : perm α) => sign_aux3 f finset.mem_univ) sorry
@[simp] theorem sign_mul {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (f : perm α) (g : perm α) :
coe_fn sign (f * g) = coe_fn sign f * coe_fn sign g :=
monoid_hom.map_mul sign f g
@[simp] theorem sign_trans {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (f : perm α) (g : perm α) :
coe_fn sign (equiv.trans f g) = coe_fn sign g * coe_fn sign f :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem sign_one {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] : coe_fn sign 1 = 1 :=
monoid_hom.map_one sign
@[simp] theorem sign_refl {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] :
coe_fn sign (equiv.refl α) = 1 :=
monoid_hom.map_one sign
@[simp] theorem sign_inv {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (f : perm α) :
coe_fn sign (f⁻¹) = coe_fn sign f :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (coe_fn sign (f⁻¹) = coe_fn sign f)) (monoid_hom.map_inv sign f)))
(eq.mpr
(id
(Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (coe_fn sign f⁻¹ = coe_fn sign f))
(int.units_inv_eq_self (coe_fn sign f))))
(Eq.refl (coe_fn sign f)))
@[simp] theorem sign_symm {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (e : perm α) :
coe_fn sign (equiv.symm e) = coe_fn sign e :=
sign_inv e
theorem sign_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {x : α} {y : α} (h : x ≠ y) :
coe_fn sign (swap x y) = -1 :=
and.right (sign_aux3_mul_and_swap 1 1 (finset.val finset.univ) finset.mem_univ) x y h
@[simp] theorem sign_swap' {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {x : α} {y : α} :
coe_fn sign (swap x y) = ite (x = y) 1 (-1) :=
sorry
theorem is_swap.sign_eq {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {f : perm α} (h : is_swap f) :
coe_fn sign f = -1 :=
sorry
theorem sign_aux3_symm_trans_trans {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α]
[DecidableEq β] [fintype β] (f : perm α) (e : α ≃ β) {s : multiset α} {t : multiset β}
(hs : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s) (ht : ∀ (x : β), x ∈ t) :
sign_aux3 (equiv.trans (equiv.trans (equiv.symm e) f) e) ht = sign_aux3 f hs :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem sign_symm_trans_trans {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α]
[DecidableEq β] [fintype β] (f : perm α) (e : α ≃ β) :
coe_fn sign (equiv.trans (equiv.trans (equiv.symm e) f) e) = coe_fn sign f :=
sign_aux3_symm_trans_trans f e finset.mem_univ finset.mem_univ
@[simp] theorem sign_trans_trans_symm {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α]
[DecidableEq β] [fintype β] (f : perm β) (e : α ≃ β) :
coe_fn sign (equiv.trans (equiv.trans e f) (equiv.symm e)) = coe_fn sign f :=
sign_symm_trans_trans f (equiv.symm e)
theorem sign_prod_list_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {l : List (perm α)}
(hl : ∀ (g : perm α), g ∈ l → is_swap g) : coe_fn sign (list.prod l) = (-1) ^ list.length l :=
sorry
theorem sign_surjective {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (hα : 1 < fintype.card α) :
function.surjective ⇑sign :=
sorry
theorem eq_sign_of_surjective_hom {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {s : perm α →* units ℤ}
(hs : function.surjective ⇑s) : s = sign :=
sorry
theorem sign_subtype_perm {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] (f : perm α) {p : α → Prop}
[decidable_pred p] (h₁ : ∀ (x : α), p x ↔ p (coe_fn f x))
(h₂ : ∀ (x : α), coe_fn f x ≠ x → p x) : coe_fn sign (subtype_perm f h₁) = coe_fn sign f :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem sign_of_subtype {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {p : α → Prop}
[decidable_pred p] (f : perm (Subtype p)) : coe_fn sign (coe_fn of_subtype f) = coe_fn sign f :=
sorry
theorem sign_eq_sign_of_equiv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] [DecidableEq β]
[fintype β] (f : perm α) (g : perm β) (e : α ≃ β)
(h : ∀ (x : α), coe_fn e (coe_fn f x) = coe_fn g (coe_fn e x)) :
coe_fn sign f = coe_fn sign g :=
sorry
theorem sign_bij {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] [DecidableEq β] [fintype β]
{f : perm α} {g : perm β} (i : (x : α) → coe_fn f x ≠ x → β)
(h :
∀ (x : α) (hx : coe_fn f x ≠ x) (hx' : coe_fn f (coe_fn f x) ≠ coe_fn f x),
i (coe_fn f x) hx' = coe_fn g (i x hx))
(hi :
∀ (x₁ x₂ : α) (hx₁ : coe_fn f x₁ ≠ x₁) (hx₂ : coe_fn f x₂ ≠ x₂),
i x₁ hx₁ = i x₂ hx₂ → x₁ = x₂)
(hg : ∀ (y : β), coe_fn g y ≠ y → ∃ (x : α), ∃ (hx : coe_fn f x ≠ x), i x hx = y) :
coe_fn sign f = coe_fn sign g :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem support_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {x : α} {y : α}
(hxy : x ≠ y) : support (swap x y) = insert x (singleton y) :=
sorry
theorem card_support_swap {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] {x : α} {y : α} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
finset.card (support (swap x y)) = bit0 1 :=
sorry
/-- If we apply `prod_extend_right a (σ a)` for all `a : α` in turn,
we get `prod_congr_right σ`. -/
theorem prod_prod_extend_right {β : Type v} {α : Type u_1} [DecidableEq α] (σ : α → perm β)
{l : List α} (hl : list.nodup l) (mem_l : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l) :
list.prod (list.map (fun (a : α) => prod_extend_right a (σ a)) l) = prod_congr_right σ :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem sign_prod_extend_right {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α]
[DecidableEq β] [fintype β] (a : α) (σ : perm β) :
coe_fn sign (prod_extend_right a σ) = coe_fn sign σ :=
sorry
theorem sign_prod_congr_right {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] [DecidableEq β]
[fintype β] (σ : α → perm β) :
coe_fn sign (prod_congr_right σ) = finset.prod finset.univ fun (k : α) => coe_fn sign (σ k) :=
sorry
theorem sign_prod_congr_left {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] [DecidableEq β]
[fintype β] (σ : α → perm β) :
coe_fn sign (prod_congr_left σ) = finset.prod finset.univ fun (k : α) => coe_fn sign (σ k) :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem sign_perm_congr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α]
[DecidableEq β] [fintype β] (e : α ≃ β) (p : perm α) :
coe_fn sign (coe_fn (perm_congr e) p) = coe_fn sign p :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem sign_sum_congr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq α] [fintype α] [DecidableEq β]
[fintype β] (σa : perm α) (σb : perm β) :
coe_fn sign (sum_congr σa σb) = coe_fn sign σa * coe_fn sign σb :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
c00843a4c894d2fd751dbf8efda1ea28c5f875da | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/ring_theory/valuation/valuation_subring.lean | faf017aa2555c486e248b0358be7e6a08286b1cf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 30,075 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Junyan Xu, Jack McKoen
-/
import ring_theory.valuation.valuation_ring
import ring_theory.localization.as_subring
import ring_theory.subring.pointwise
import algebraic_geometry.prime_spectrum.basic
/-!
# Valuation subrings of a field
## Projects
The order structure on `valuation_subring K`.
-/
open_locale classical
noncomputable theory
variables (K : Type*) [field K]
/-- A valuation subring of a field `K` is a subring `A` such that for every `x : K`,
either `x ∈ A` or `x⁻¹ ∈ A`. -/
structure valuation_subring extends subring K :=
(mem_or_inv_mem' : ∀ x : K, x ∈ carrier ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ carrier)
namespace valuation_subring
variables {K} (A : valuation_subring K)
instance : set_like (valuation_subring K) K :=
{ coe := λ A, A.to_subring,
coe_injective' := by { rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ _, congr' } }
@[simp] lemma mem_carrier (x : K) : x ∈ A.carrier ↔ x ∈ A := iff.refl _
@[simp] lemma mem_to_subring (x : K) : x ∈ A.to_subring ↔ x ∈ A := iff.refl _
@[ext] lemma ext (A B : valuation_subring K)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) : A = B := set_like.ext h
lemma zero_mem : (0 : K) ∈ A := A.to_subring.zero_mem
lemma one_mem : (1 : K) ∈ A := A.to_subring.one_mem
lemma add_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x + y ∈ A := A.to_subring.add_mem
lemma mul_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x * y ∈ A := A.to_subring.mul_mem
lemma neg_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A → (-x) ∈ A := A.to_subring.neg_mem
lemma mem_or_inv_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ A := A.mem_or_inv_mem' _
instance : subring_class (valuation_subring K) K :=
{ zero_mem := zero_mem,
add_mem := add_mem,
one_mem := one_mem,
mul_mem := mul_mem,
neg_mem := neg_mem }
lemma to_subring_injective : function.injective (to_subring : valuation_subring K → subring K) :=
λ x y h, by { cases x, cases y, congr' }
instance : comm_ring A := show comm_ring A.to_subring, by apply_instance
instance : is_domain A := show is_domain A.to_subring, by apply_instance
instance : has_top (valuation_subring K) := has_top.mk $
{ mem_or_inv_mem' := λ x, or.inl trivial,
..(⊤ : subring K) }
lemma mem_top (x : K) : x ∈ (⊤ : valuation_subring K) := trivial
lemma le_top : A ≤ ⊤ := λ a ha, mem_top _
instance : order_top (valuation_subring K) :=
{ top := ⊤,
le_top := le_top }
instance : inhabited (valuation_subring K) := ⟨⊤⟩
instance : valuation_ring A :=
{ cond := λ a b,
begin
by_cases (b : K) = 0, { use 0, left, ext, simp [h] },
by_cases (a : K) = 0, { use 0, right, ext, simp [h] },
cases A.mem_or_inv_mem (a/b) with hh hh,
{ use ⟨a/b, hh⟩, right, ext, field_simp, ring },
{ rw (show (a/b : K)⁻¹ = b/a, by field_simp) at hh,
use ⟨b/a, hh⟩, left, ext, field_simp, ring },
end }
instance : algebra A K :=
show algebra A.to_subring K, by apply_instance
@[simp]
lemma algebra_map_apply (a : A) : algebra_map A K a = a := rfl
instance : is_fraction_ring A K :=
{ map_units := λ ⟨y, hy⟩,
(units.mk0 (y : K) (λ c, non_zero_divisors.ne_zero hy $ subtype.ext c)).is_unit,
surj := λ z, begin
by_cases z = 0, { use (0, 1), simp [h] },
cases A.mem_or_inv_mem z with hh hh,
{ use (⟨z, hh⟩, 1), simp },
{ refine ⟨⟨1, ⟨⟨_, hh⟩, _⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel h⟩,
exact mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.2 (λ c, h (inv_eq_zero.mp (congr_arg coe c))) },
end,
eq_iff_exists := λ a b, ⟨ λ h, ⟨1, by { ext, simpa using h }⟩, λ ⟨c, h⟩,
congr_arg coe ((mul_eq_mul_left_iff.1 h).resolve_right (non_zero_divisors.ne_zero c.2)) ⟩ }
/-- The value group of the valuation associated to `A`. Note: it is actually a group with zero. -/
@[derive linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero]
def value_group := valuation_ring.value_group A K
/-- Any valuation subring of `K` induces a natural valuation on `K`. -/
def valuation : valuation K A.value_group := valuation_ring.valuation A K
instance inhabited_value_group : inhabited A.value_group := ⟨A.valuation 0⟩
lemma valuation_le_one (a : A) : A.valuation a ≤ 1 :=
(valuation_ring.mem_integer_iff A K _).2 ⟨a, rfl⟩
lemma mem_of_valuation_le_one (x : K) (h : A.valuation x ≤ 1) : x ∈ A :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (valuation_ring.mem_integer_iff A K x).1 h in ha ▸ a.2
lemma valuation_le_one_iff (x : K) : A.valuation x ≤ 1 ↔ x ∈ A :=
⟨mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _, λ ha, A.valuation_le_one ⟨x, ha⟩⟩
lemma valuation_eq_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x = A.valuation y ↔
∃ a : Aˣ, (a : K) * y = x := quotient.eq'
lemma valuation_le_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x ≤ A.valuation y ↔
∃ a : A, (a : K) * y = x := iff.rfl
lemma valuation_surjective : function.surjective A.valuation := surjective_quot_mk _
lemma valuation_unit (a : Aˣ) : A.valuation a = 1 :=
by { rw [← A.valuation.map_one, valuation_eq_iff], use a, simp }
lemma valuation_eq_one_iff (a : A) : is_unit a ↔ A.valuation a = 1 :=
⟨ λ h, A.valuation_unit h.unit,
λ h, begin
have ha : (a : K) ≠ 0,
{ intro c, rw [c, A.valuation.map_zero] at h, exact zero_ne_one h },
have ha' : (a : K)⁻¹ ∈ A,
{ rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, h, inv_one] },
apply is_unit_of_mul_eq_one a ⟨a⁻¹, ha'⟩, ext, field_simp,
end ⟩
lemma valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one (a : A) : A.valuation a < 1 ∨ A.valuation a = 1 :=
lt_or_eq_of_le (A.valuation_le_one a)
lemma valuation_lt_one_iff (a : A) : a ∈ local_ring.maximal_ideal A ↔ A.valuation a < 1 :=
begin
rw local_ring.mem_maximal_ideal,
dsimp [nonunits], rw valuation_eq_one_iff,
exact (A.valuation_le_one a).lt_iff_ne.symm,
end
/-- A subring `R` of `K` such that for all `x : K` either `x ∈ R` or `x⁻¹ ∈ R` is
a valuation subring of `K`. -/
def of_subring (R : subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) : valuation_subring K :=
{ mem_or_inv_mem' := hR, ..R }
@[simp]
lemma mem_of_subring (R : subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) (x : K) :
x ∈ of_subring R hR ↔ x ∈ R := iff.refl _
/-- An overring of a valuation ring is a valuation ring. -/
def of_le (R : valuation_subring K) (S : subring K) (h : R.to_subring ≤ S) :
valuation_subring K :=
{ mem_or_inv_mem' := λ x, (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).imp (@h x) (@h _), ..S}
section order
instance : semilattice_sup (valuation_subring K) :=
{ sup := λ R S, of_le R (R.to_subring ⊔ S.to_subring) $ le_sup_left,
le_sup_left := λ R S x hx, (le_sup_left : R.to_subring ≤ R.to_subring ⊔ S.to_subring) hx,
le_sup_right := λ R S x hx, (le_sup_right : S.to_subring ≤ R.to_subring ⊔ S.to_subring) hx,
sup_le := λ R S T hR hT x hx, (sup_le hR hT : R.to_subring ⊔ S.to_subring ≤ T.to_subring) hx,
..(infer_instance : partial_order (valuation_subring K)) }
/-- The ring homomorphism induced by the partial order. -/
def inclusion (R S : valuation_subring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R →+* S :=
subring.inclusion h
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from a valuation ring to its field of fractions. -/
def subtype (R : valuation_subring K) : R →+* K :=
subring.subtype R.to_subring
/-- The canonical map on value groups induced by a coarsening of valuation rings. -/
def map_of_le (R S : valuation_subring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
R.value_group →*₀ S.value_group :=
{ to_fun := quotient.map' id $ λ x y ⟨u, hu⟩, ⟨units.map (R.inclusion S h).to_monoid_hom u, hu⟩,
map_zero' := rfl,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := by { rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩, refl } }
@[mono]
lemma monotone_map_of_le (R S : valuation_subring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
monotone (R.map_of_le S h) :=
by { rintros ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨a, ha⟩, exact ⟨R.inclusion S h a, ha⟩ }
@[simp]
lemma map_of_le_comp_valuation (R S : valuation_subring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
R.map_of_le S h ∘ R.valuation = S.valuation := by { ext, refl }
@[simp]
lemma map_of_le_valuation_apply (R S : valuation_subring K) (h : R ≤ S) (x : K) :
R.map_of_le S h (R.valuation x) = S.valuation x := rfl
/-- The ideal corresponding to a coarsening of a valuation ring. -/
def ideal_of_le (R S : valuation_subring K) (h : R ≤ S) : ideal R :=
(local_ring.maximal_ideal S).comap (R.inclusion S h)
instance prime_ideal_of_le (R S : valuation_subring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
(ideal_of_le R S h).is_prime := (local_ring.maximal_ideal S).comap_is_prime _
/-- The coarsening of a valuation ring associated to a prime ideal. -/
def of_prime (A : valuation_subring K) (P : ideal A) [P.is_prime] :
valuation_subring K :=
of_le A (localization.subalgebra.of_field K _ P.prime_compl_le_non_zero_divisors).to_subring $
λ a ha, subalgebra.algebra_map_mem _ (⟨a, ha⟩ : A)
instance of_prime_algebra (A : valuation_subring K) (P : ideal A) [P.is_prime] :
algebra A (A.of_prime P) := subalgebra.algebra _
instance of_prime_scalar_tower (A : valuation_subring K) (P : ideal A) [P.is_prime] :
is_scalar_tower A (A.of_prime P) K := is_scalar_tower.subalgebra' A K K _
instance of_prime_localization (A : valuation_subring K) (P : ideal A) [P.is_prime] :
is_localization.at_prime (A.of_prime P) P :=
by apply localization.subalgebra.is_localization_of_field K P.prime_compl
P.prime_compl_le_non_zero_divisors
lemma le_of_prime (A : valuation_subring K) (P : ideal A) [P.is_prime] :
A ≤ of_prime A P :=
λ a ha, subalgebra.algebra_map_mem _ (⟨a, ha⟩ : A)
lemma of_prime_valuation_eq_one_iff_mem_prime_compl
(A : valuation_subring K)
(P : ideal A) [P.is_prime] (x : A) :
(of_prime A P).valuation x = 1 ↔ x ∈ P.prime_compl :=
begin
rw [← is_localization.at_prime.is_unit_to_map_iff (A.of_prime P) P x, valuation_eq_one_iff], refl,
end
@[simp]
lemma ideal_of_le_of_prime (A : valuation_subring K) (P : ideal A) [P.is_prime] :
ideal_of_le A (of_prime A P) (le_of_prime A P) = P :=
by { ext, apply is_localization.at_prime.to_map_mem_maximal_iff }
@[simp]
lemma of_prime_ideal_of_le (R S : valuation_subring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
of_prime R (ideal_of_le R S h) = S :=
begin
ext x, split,
{ rintro ⟨a, r, hr, rfl⟩, apply mul_mem, { exact h a.2 },
{ rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, ← inv_one, inv_le_inv₀],
{ exact not_lt.1 ((not_iff_not.2 $ valuation_lt_one_iff S _).1 hr) },
{ intro hh, erw [valuation.zero_iff, subring.coe_eq_zero_iff] at hh,
apply hr, rw hh, apply ideal.zero_mem (R.ideal_of_le S h) },
{ exact one_ne_zero } } },
{ intro hx, by_cases hr : x ∈ R, { exact R.le_of_prime _ hr },
have : x ≠ 0 := λ h, hr (by { rw h, exact R.zero_mem }),
replace hr := (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).resolve_left hr,
{ use [1, x⁻¹, hr], split,
{ change (⟨x⁻¹, h hr⟩ : S) ∉ nonunits S,
erw [mem_nonunits_iff, not_not],
apply is_unit_of_mul_eq_one _ (⟨x, hx⟩ : S),
ext, field_simp },
{ field_simp } } },
end
lemma of_prime_le_of_le (P Q : ideal A) [P.is_prime] [Q.is_prime]
(h : P ≤ Q) : of_prime A Q ≤ of_prime A P :=
λ x ⟨a, s, hs, he⟩, ⟨a, s, λ c, hs (h c), he⟩
lemma ideal_of_le_le_of_le (R S : valuation_subring K)
(hR : A ≤ R) (hS : A ≤ S) (h : R ≤ S) :
ideal_of_le A S hS ≤ ideal_of_le A R hR :=
λ x hx, (valuation_lt_one_iff R _).2 begin
by_contra c, push_neg at c, replace c := monotone_map_of_le R S h c,
rw [(map_of_le _ _ _).map_one, map_of_le_valuation_apply] at c,
apply not_le_of_lt ((valuation_lt_one_iff S _).1 hx) c,
end
/-- The equivalence between coarsenings of a valuation ring and its prime ideals.-/
@[simps]
def prime_spectrum_equiv :
prime_spectrum A ≃ { S | A ≤ S } :=
{ to_fun := λ P, ⟨of_prime A P.as_ideal, le_of_prime _ _⟩,
inv_fun := λ S, ⟨ideal_of_le _ S S.2, infer_instance⟩,
left_inv := λ P, by { ext1, simp },
right_inv := λ S, by { ext1, simp } }
/-- An ordered variant of `prime_spectrum_equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def prime_spectrum_order_equiv : (prime_spectrum A)ᵒᵈ ≃o {S | A ≤ S} :=
{ map_rel_iff' := λ P Q,
⟨ λ h, begin
have := ideal_of_le_le_of_le A _ _ _ _ h,
iterate 2 { erw ideal_of_le_of_prime at this },
exact this,
end,
λ h, by { apply of_prime_le_of_le, exact h } ⟩,
..(prime_spectrum_equiv A) }
instance linear_order_overring : linear_order { S | A ≤ S } :=
{ le_total :=
let i : is_total (prime_spectrum A) (≤) := ⟨λ ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩, has_le.le.is_total.total x y⟩ in
by exactI (prime_spectrum_order_equiv A).symm.to_rel_embedding.is_total.total,
decidable_le := infer_instance,
..(infer_instance : partial_order _) }
end order
end valuation_subring
namespace valuation
variables {K} {Γ Γ₁ Γ₂ : Type*}
[linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero Γ]
[linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero Γ₁]
[linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero Γ₂]
(v : valuation K Γ)
(v₁ : valuation K Γ₁)
(v₂ : valuation K Γ₂)
/-- The valuation subring associated to a valuation. -/
def valuation_subring : valuation_subring K :=
{ mem_or_inv_mem' := begin
intros x,
cases le_or_lt (v x) 1,
{ left, exact h },
{ right, change v x⁻¹ ≤ 1,
rw [map_inv₀ v, ← inv_one, inv_le_inv₀],
{ exact le_of_lt h },
{ intro c, simpa [c] using h },
{ exact one_ne_zero } }
end,
.. v.integer }
@[simp]
lemma mem_valuation_subring_iff (x : K) : x ∈ v.valuation_subring ↔ v x ≤ 1 := iff.refl _
lemma is_equiv_iff_valuation_subring : v₁.is_equiv v₂ ↔
v₁.valuation_subring = v₂.valuation_subring :=
begin
split,
{ intros h, ext x, specialize h x 1, simpa using h },
{ intros h, apply is_equiv_of_val_le_one,
intros x,
have : x ∈ v₁.valuation_subring ↔ x ∈ v₂.valuation_subring, by rw h,
simpa using this }
end
lemma is_equiv_valuation_valuation_subring :
v.is_equiv v.valuation_subring.valuation :=
begin
rw [is_equiv_iff_val_le_one],
intro x,
rw valuation_subring.valuation_le_one_iff,
refl,
end
end valuation
namespace valuation_subring
variables {K} (A : valuation_subring K)
@[simp]
lemma valuation_subring_valuation : A.valuation.valuation_subring = A :=
by { ext, rw ← A.valuation_le_one_iff, refl }
section unit_group
/-- The unit group of a valuation subring, as a subgroup of `Kˣ`. -/
def unit_group : subgroup Kˣ :=
(A.valuation.to_monoid_with_zero_hom.to_monoid_hom.comp (units.coe_hom K)).ker
@[simp] lemma mem_unit_group_iff (x : Kˣ) : x ∈ A.unit_group ↔ A.valuation x = 1 := iff.rfl
/-- For a valuation subring `A`, `A.unit_group` agrees with the units of `A`. -/
def unit_group_mul_equiv : A.unit_group ≃* Aˣ :=
{ to_fun := λ x,
{ val := ⟨x, mem_of_valuation_le_one A _ x.prop.le⟩,
inv := ⟨↑(x⁻¹), mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _ (x⁻¹).prop.le⟩,
val_inv := subtype.ext (units.mul_inv x),
inv_val := subtype.ext (units.inv_mul x) },
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨units.map A.subtype.to_monoid_hom x, A.valuation_unit x⟩,
left_inv := λ a, by { ext, refl },
right_inv := λ a, by { ext, refl },
map_mul' := λ a b, by { ext, refl } }
@[simp]
lemma coe_unit_group_mul_equiv_apply (a : A.unit_group) :
(A.unit_group_mul_equiv a : K) = a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_unit_group_mul_equiv_symm_apply (a : Aˣ) :
(A.unit_group_mul_equiv.symm a : K) = a := rfl
lemma unit_group_le_unit_group {A B : valuation_subring K} :
A.unit_group ≤ B.unit_group ↔ A ≤ B :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x hx,
rw [← A.valuation_le_one_iff x, le_iff_lt_or_eq] at hx,
by_cases h_1 : x = 0, { simp only [h_1, zero_mem] },
by_cases h_2 : 1 + x = 0,
{ simp only [← add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq.1 h_2, neg_mem _ _ (one_mem _)] },
cases hx,
{ have := h (show (units.mk0 _ h_2) ∈ A.unit_group, from A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt hx),
simpa using B.add_mem _ _
(show 1 + x ∈ B, from set_like.coe_mem ((B.unit_group_mul_equiv ⟨_, this⟩) : B))
(B.neg_mem _ B.one_mem) },
{ have := h (show (units.mk0 x h_1) ∈ A.unit_group, from hx),
refine set_like.coe_mem ((B.unit_group_mul_equiv ⟨_, this⟩) : B) } },
{ rintros h x (hx : A.valuation x = 1),
apply_fun A.map_of_le B h at hx,
simpa using hx }
end
lemma unit_group_injective : function.injective (unit_group : valuation_subring K → subgroup _) :=
λ A B h, by { simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, unit_group_le_unit_group] using h}
lemma eq_iff_unit_group {A B : valuation_subring K} :
A = B ↔ A.unit_group = B.unit_group :=
unit_group_injective.eq_iff.symm
/-- The map on valuation subrings to their unit groups is an order embedding. -/
def unit_group_order_embedding : valuation_subring K ↪o subgroup Kˣ :=
{ to_fun := λ A, A.unit_group,
inj' := unit_group_injective,
map_rel_iff' := λ A B, unit_group_le_unit_group }
lemma unit_group_strict_mono : strict_mono (unit_group : valuation_subring K → subgroup _) :=
unit_group_order_embedding.strict_mono
end unit_group
section nonunits
/-- The nonunits of a valuation subring of `K`, as a subsemigroup of `K`-/
def nonunits : subsemigroup K :=
{ carrier := { x | A.valuation x < 1 },
mul_mem' := λ a b ha hb, (mul_lt_mul₀ ha hb).trans_eq $ mul_one _ }
lemma mem_nonunits_iff {x : K} : x ∈ A.nonunits ↔ A.valuation x < 1 := iff.rfl
lemma nonunits_le_nonunits {A B : valuation_subring K} :
B.nonunits ≤ A.nonunits ↔ A ≤ B :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x hx,
by_cases h_1 : x = 0, { simp only [h_1, zero_mem] },
rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, ← not_lt, valuation.one_lt_val_iff _ h_1] at hx ⊢,
by_contra h_2, from hx (h h_2) },
{ intros h x hx,
by_contra h_1, from not_lt.2 (monotone_map_of_le _ _ h (not_lt.1 h_1)) hx }
end
lemma nonunits_injective :
function.injective (nonunits : valuation_subring K → subsemigroup _) :=
λ A B h, by { simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, nonunits_le_nonunits] using h.symm }
lemma nonunits_inj {A B : valuation_subring K} : A.nonunits = B.nonunits ↔ A = B :=
nonunits_injective.eq_iff
/-- The map on valuation subrings to their nonunits is a dual order embedding. -/
def nonunits_order_embedding :
valuation_subring K ↪o (subsemigroup K)ᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ A, A.nonunits,
inj' := nonunits_injective,
map_rel_iff' := λ A B, nonunits_le_nonunits }
variables {A}
/-- The elements of `A.nonunits` are those of the maximal ideal of `A` after coercion to `K`.
See also `mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximal_ideal`, which gets rid of the coercion to `K`,
at the expense of a more complicated right hand side.
-/
theorem coe_mem_nonunits_iff {a : A} : (a : K) ∈ A.nonunits ↔ a ∈ local_ring.maximal_ideal A :=
(valuation_lt_one_iff _ _).symm
lemma nonunits_le : A.nonunits ≤ A.to_subring.to_submonoid.to_subsemigroup :=
λ a ha, (A.valuation_le_one_iff _).mp (A.mem_nonunits_iff.mp ha).le
lemma nonunits_subset : (A.nonunits : set K) ⊆ A := nonunits_le
/-- The elements of `A.nonunits` are those of the maximal ideal of `A`.
See also `coe_mem_nonunits_iff`, which has a simpler right hand side but requires the element
to be in `A` already.
-/
theorem mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximal_ideal {a : K} :
a ∈ A.nonunits ↔ ∃ ha, (⟨a, ha⟩ : A) ∈ local_ring.maximal_ideal A :=
⟨λ h, ⟨nonunits_subset h, coe_mem_nonunits_iff.mp h⟩,
λ ⟨ha, h⟩, coe_mem_nonunits_iff.mpr h⟩
/-- `A.nonunits` agrees with the maximal ideal of `A`, after taking its image in `K`. -/
theorem image_maximal_ideal : (coe : A → K) '' local_ring.maximal_ideal A = A.nonunits :=
begin
ext a,
simp only [set.mem_image, set_like.mem_coe, mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximal_ideal],
erw subtype.exists,
simp_rw [subtype.coe_mk, exists_and_distrib_right, exists_eq_right],
end
end nonunits
section principal_unit_group
/-- The principal unit group of a valuation subring, as a subgroup of `Kˣ`. -/
def principal_unit_group : subgroup Kˣ :=
{ carrier := { x | A.valuation (x - 1) < 1 },
mul_mem' := begin
intros a b ha hb,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ (max_lt hb ha),
rw [← one_mul (A.valuation (b - 1)), ← A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt ha, add_sub_cancel'_right,
← valuation.map_mul, mul_sub_one, ← sub_add_sub_cancel],
exact A.valuation.map_add _ _,
end,
one_mem' := by simp,
inv_mem' := begin
dsimp,
intros a ha,
conv {to_lhs, rw [← mul_one (A.valuation _), ← A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt ha]},
rwa [add_sub_cancel'_right, ← valuation.map_mul, sub_mul, units.inv_mul, ← neg_sub, one_mul,
valuation.map_neg],
end }
lemma principal_units_le_units : A.principal_unit_group ≤ A.unit_group :=
λ a h, by simpa only [add_sub_cancel'_right] using A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt h
lemma mem_principal_unit_group_iff (x : Kˣ) :
x ∈ A.principal_unit_group ↔ A.valuation ((x : K) - 1) < 1 := iff.rfl
lemma principal_unit_group_le_principal_unit_group {A B : valuation_subring K} :
B.principal_unit_group ≤ A.principal_unit_group ↔ A ≤ B :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x hx,
by_cases h_1 : x = 0, { simp only [h_1, zero_mem] },
by_cases h_2 : x⁻¹ + 1 = 0,
{ rw [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, inv_neg, inv_one] at h_2,
simpa only [h_2] using B.neg_mem _ B.one_mem },
{ rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, ← not_lt, valuation.one_lt_val_iff _ h_1, ← add_sub_cancel x⁻¹,
← units.coe_mk0 h_2, ← mem_principal_unit_group_iff] at hx ⊢,
simpa only [hx] using @h (units.mk0 (x⁻¹ + 1) h_2) } },
{ intros h x hx,
by_contra h_1, from not_lt.2 (monotone_map_of_le _ _ h (not_lt.1 h_1)) hx }
end
lemma principal_unit_group_injective :
function.injective (principal_unit_group : valuation_subring K → subgroup _) :=
λ A B h, by { simpa [le_antisymm_iff, principal_unit_group_le_principal_unit_group] using h.symm }
lemma eq_iff_principal_unit_group {A B : valuation_subring K} :
A = B ↔ A.principal_unit_group = B.principal_unit_group :=
principal_unit_group_injective.eq_iff.symm
/-- The map on valuation subrings to their principal unit groups is an order embedding. -/
def principal_unit_group_order_embedding :
valuation_subring K ↪o (subgroup Kˣ)ᵒᵈ :=
{ to_fun := λ A, A.principal_unit_group,
inj' := principal_unit_group_injective,
map_rel_iff' := λ A B, principal_unit_group_le_principal_unit_group }
lemma coe_mem_principal_unit_group_iff {x : A.unit_group} :
(x : Kˣ) ∈ A.principal_unit_group ↔
A.unit_group_mul_equiv x ∈ (units.map (local_ring.residue A).to_monoid_hom).ker :=
begin
rw [monoid_hom.mem_ker, units.ext_iff],
let π := ideal.quotient.mk (local_ring.maximal_ideal A), convert_to _ ↔ π _ = 1,
rw [← π.map_one, ← sub_eq_zero, ← π.map_sub, ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem,
valuation_lt_one_iff],
simpa,
end
/-- The principal unit group agrees with the kernel of the canonical map from
the units of `A` to the units of the residue field of `A`. -/
def principal_unit_group_equiv :
A.principal_unit_group ≃* (units.map (local_ring.residue A).to_monoid_hom).ker :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨A.unit_group_mul_equiv ⟨_, A.principal_units_le_units x.2⟩,
A.coe_mem_principal_unit_group_iff.1 x.2⟩,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨A.unit_group_mul_equiv.symm x,
by { rw A.coe_mem_principal_unit_group_iff, simpa using set_like.coe_mem x }⟩,
left_inv := λ x, by simp,
right_inv := λ x, by simp,
map_mul' := λ x y, by refl, }
@[simp]
lemma principal_unit_group_equiv_apply (a : A.principal_unit_group) :
(principal_unit_group_equiv A a : K) = a := rfl
@[simp]
lemma principal_unit_group_symm_apply
(a : (units.map (local_ring.residue A).to_monoid_hom).ker) :
(A.principal_unit_group_equiv.symm a : K) = a := rfl
/-- The canonical map from the unit group of `A` to the units of the residue field of `A`. -/
def unit_group_to_residue_field_units :
A.unit_group →* (local_ring.residue_field A)ˣ :=
monoid_hom.comp (units.map $ (ideal.quotient.mk _).to_monoid_hom)
A.unit_group_mul_equiv.to_monoid_hom
@[simp]
lemma coe_unit_group_to_residue_field_units_apply (x : A.unit_group) :
(A.unit_group_to_residue_field_units x : (local_ring.residue_field A) ) =
(ideal.quotient.mk _ (A.unit_group_mul_equiv x : A)) := rfl
lemma ker_unit_group_to_residue_field_units :
A.unit_group_to_residue_field_units.ker = A.principal_unit_group.comap A.unit_group.subtype :=
by { ext, simpa only [subgroup.mem_comap, subgroup.coe_subtype, coe_mem_principal_unit_group_iff] }
lemma surjective_unit_group_to_residue_field_units :
function.surjective A.unit_group_to_residue_field_units :=
(local_ring.surjective_units_map_of_local_ring_hom _
ideal.quotient.mk_surjective local_ring.is_local_ring_hom_residue).comp (mul_equiv.surjective _)
/-- The quotient of the unit group of `A` by the principal unit group of `A` agrees with
the units of the residue field of `A`. -/
def units_mod_principal_units_equiv_residue_field_units :
(A.unit_group ⧸ (A.principal_unit_group.comap A.unit_group.subtype)) ≃*
(local_ring.residue_field A)ˣ :=
(quotient_group.quotient_mul_equiv_of_eq A.ker_unit_group_to_residue_field_units.symm).trans
(quotient_group.quotient_ker_equiv_of_surjective _ A.surjective_unit_group_to_residue_field_units)
@[simp]
lemma units_mod_principal_units_equiv_residue_field_units_comp_quotient_group_mk :
A.units_mod_principal_units_equiv_residue_field_units.to_monoid_hom.comp
(quotient_group.mk' _) = A.unit_group_to_residue_field_units := rfl
@[simp]
lemma units_mod_principal_units_equiv_residue_field_units_comp_quotient_group_mk_apply
(x : A.unit_group) :
A.units_mod_principal_units_equiv_residue_field_units.to_monoid_hom
(quotient_group.mk x) = A.unit_group_to_residue_field_units x := rfl
end principal_unit_group
/-! ### Pointwise actions
This transfers the action from `subring.pointwise_mul_action`, noting that it only applies when
the action is by a group. Notably this provides an instances when `G` is `K ≃+* K`.
These instances are in the `pointwise` locale.
The lemmas in this section are copied from `ring_theory/subring/pointwise.lean`; try to keep these
in sync.
-/
section pointwise_actions
open_locale pointwise
variables {G : Type*} [group G] [mul_semiring_action G K]
/-- The action on a valuation subring corresponding to applying the action to every element.
This is available as an instance in the `pointwise` locale. -/
def pointwise_has_smul : has_smul G (valuation_subring K) :=
{ smul := λ g S,
-- TODO: if we add `valuation_subring.map` at a later date, we should use it here
{ mem_or_inv_mem' := λ x, (mem_or_inv_mem S (g⁻¹ • x)).imp
(subring.mem_pointwise_smul_iff_inv_smul_mem.mpr)
(λ h, subring.mem_pointwise_smul_iff_inv_smul_mem.mpr $ by rwa smul_inv''),
.. g • S.to_subring } }
localized "attribute [instance] valuation_subring.pointwise_has_smul" in pointwise
open_locale pointwise
@[simp] lemma coe_pointwise_smul (g : G) (S : valuation_subring K) : ↑(g • S) = g • (S : set K) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma pointwise_smul_to_subring (g : G) (S : valuation_subring K) :
(g • S).to_subring = g • S.to_subring := rfl
/-- The action on a valuation subring corresponding to applying the action to every element.
This is available as an instance in the `pointwise` locale.
This is a stronger version of `valuation_subring.pointwise_has_smul`. -/
def pointwise_mul_action : mul_action G (valuation_subring K) :=
to_subring_injective.mul_action to_subring pointwise_smul_to_subring
localized "attribute [instance] valuation_subring.pointwise_mul_action" in pointwise
open_locale pointwise
lemma smul_mem_pointwise_smul (g : G) (x : K) (S : valuation_subring K) : x ∈ S → g • x ∈ g • S :=
(set.smul_mem_smul_set : _ → _ ∈ g • (S : set K))
lemma mem_smul_pointwise_iff_exists (g : G) (x : K) (S : valuation_subring K) :
x ∈ g • S ↔ ∃ (s : K), s ∈ S ∧ g • s = x :=
(set.mem_smul_set : x ∈ g • (S : set K) ↔ _)
instance pointwise_central_scalar [mul_semiring_action Gᵐᵒᵖ K] [is_central_scalar G K] :
is_central_scalar G (valuation_subring K) :=
⟨λ g S, to_subring_injective $ by exact op_smul_eq_smul g S.to_subring⟩
@[simp] lemma smul_mem_pointwise_smul_iff {g : G} {S : valuation_subring K} {x : K} :
g • x ∈ g • S ↔ x ∈ S :=
set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff
lemma mem_pointwise_smul_iff_inv_smul_mem {g : G} {S : valuation_subring K} {x : K} :
x ∈ g • S ↔ g⁻¹ • x ∈ S :=
set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem
lemma mem_inv_pointwise_smul_iff {g : G} {S : valuation_subring K} {x : K} :
x ∈ g⁻¹ • S ↔ g • x ∈ S :=
set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff
@[simp] lemma pointwise_smul_le_pointwise_smul_iff {g : G} {S T : valuation_subring K} :
g • S ≤ g • T ↔ S ≤ T :=
set.set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff
lemma pointwise_smul_subset_iff {g : G} {S T : valuation_subring K} : g • S ≤ T ↔ S ≤ g⁻¹ • T :=
set.set_smul_subset_iff
lemma subset_pointwise_smul_iff {g : G} {S T : valuation_subring K} : S ≤ g • T ↔ g⁻¹ • S ≤ T :=
set.subset_set_smul_iff
end pointwise_actions
section
variables {L J: Type*} [field L] [field J]
/-- The pullback of a valuation subring `A` along a ring homomorphism `K →+* L`. -/
def comap (A : valuation_subring L) (f : K →+* L) :
valuation_subring K :=
{ mem_or_inv_mem' := λ k, by simp [valuation_subring.mem_or_inv_mem],
..(A.to_subring.comap f) }
@[simp]
lemma coe_comap (A : valuation_subring L) (f : K →+* L) : (A.comap f : set K) = f ⁻¹' A := rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_comap {A : valuation_subring L} {f : K →+* L} {x : K} : x ∈ A.comap f ↔ f x ∈ A := iff.rfl
lemma comap_comap (A : valuation_subring J) (g : L →+* J) (f : K →+* L) :
(A.comap g).comap f = A.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
end
end valuation_subring
namespace valuation
variables {Γ : Type*} [linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero Γ] (v : valuation K Γ) (x : Kˣ)
@[simp] lemma mem_unit_group_iff : x ∈ v.valuation_subring.unit_group ↔ v x = 1 :=
(valuation.is_equiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).mp (valuation.is_equiv_valuation_valuation_subring _).symm
end valuation
|
3e6b223c7a74c29566ce0c2636c5c103941873a8 | ac89c256db07448984849346288e0eeffe8b20d0 | /tests/lean/343.lean | b90367f30e27a3bf2e490eade51ae7c9a50cf33f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | chepinzhang/lean4 | 002cc667f35417a418f0ebc9cb4a44559bb0ccac | 24fe2875c68549b5481f07c57eab4ad4a0ae5305 | refs/heads/master | 1,688,942,838,326 | 1,628,801,942,000 | 1,628,801,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 620 | lean | structure CatIsh where
Obj : Type o
Hom : Obj → Obj → Type m
infixr:75 " ~> " => (CatIsh.Hom _)
structure FunctorIsh (C D : CatIsh) where
onObj : C.Obj → D.Obj
onHom : ∀ {s d : C.Obj}, (s ~> d) → (onObj s ~> onObj d)
abbrev Catish : CatIsh :=
{
Obj := CatIsh
Hom := FunctorIsh
}
universe m o
unif_hint (mvar : CatIsh) where
Catish.{o,m} =?= mvar |- mvar.Obj =?= CatIsh.{m,o}
structure CtxSyntaxLayerParamsObj where
Ct : CatIsh
def CtxSyntaxLayerParams : CatIsh :=
{
Obj := CtxSyntaxLayerParamsObj
Hom := sorry
}
def CtxSyntaxLayerTy := CtxSyntaxLayerParams ~> Catish
|
224f8130c4589f628c76b03df585dd97e42155a9 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/algebra/module/submodule/lattice.lean | b8a8638df8e2e56f084287ec264abb68643d1638 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,636 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.module.submodule.basic
import algebra.punit_instances
/-!
# The lattice structure on `submodule`s
This file defines the lattice structure on submodules, `submodule.complete_lattice`, with `⊥`
defined as `{0}` and `⊓` defined as intersection of the underlying carrier.
If `p` and `q` are submodules of a module, `p ≤ q` means that `p ⊆ q`.
Many results about operations on this lattice structure are defined in `linear_algebra/basic.lean`,
most notably those which use `span`.
## Implementation notes
This structure should match the `add_submonoid.complete_lattice` structure, and we should try
to unify the APIs where possible.
-/
variables {R S M : Type*}
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [semiring S] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] [module S M]
variables [has_scalar S R] [is_scalar_tower S R M]
variables {p q : submodule R M}
namespace submodule
/-- The set `{0}` is the bottom element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : has_bot (submodule R M) :=
⟨{ carrier := {0}, smul_mem' := by simp { contextual := tt }, .. (⊥ : add_submonoid M)}⟩
instance inhabited' : inhabited (submodule R M) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp] lemma bot_coe : ((⊥ : submodule R M) : set M) = {0} := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_to_add_submonoid : (⊥ : submodule R M).to_add_submonoid = ⊥ := rfl
section
variables (R)
@[simp] lemma restrict_scalars_bot : restrict_scalars S (⊥ : submodule R M) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_bot {x : M} : x ∈ (⊥ : submodule R M) ↔ x = 0 := set.mem_singleton_iff
end
@[simp] lemma restrict_scalars_eq_bot_iff {p : submodule R M} :
restrict_scalars S p = ⊥ ↔ p = ⊥ :=
by simp [set_like.ext_iff]
instance unique_bot : unique (⊥ : submodule R M) :=
⟨infer_instance, λ x, subtype.ext $ (mem_bot R).1 x.mem⟩
instance : order_bot (submodule R M) :=
{ bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ p x, by simp [zero_mem] {contextual := tt} }
protected lemma eq_bot_iff (p : submodule R M) : p = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x = (0 : M) :=
⟨ λ h, h.symm ▸ λ x hx, (mem_bot R).mp hx,
λ h, eq_bot_iff.mpr (λ x hx, (mem_bot R).mpr (h x hx)) ⟩
@[ext] protected lemma bot_ext (x y : (⊥ : submodule R M)) : x = y :=
begin
rcases x with ⟨x, xm⟩, rcases y with ⟨y, ym⟩, congr,
rw (submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl x xm,
rw (submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl y ym,
end
protected lemma ne_bot_iff (p : submodule R M) : p ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ x ∈ p, x ≠ (0 : M) :=
by { haveI := classical.prop_decidable, simp_rw [ne.def, p.eq_bot_iff, not_forall] }
lemma nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt {p : submodule R M} (bot_lt : ⊥ < p) : ∃ a : p, a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp bot_lt.ne' in ⟨⟨b, hb₁⟩, hb₂ ∘ (congr_arg coe)⟩
lemma exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot {p : submodule R M} (h : p ≠ ⊥) : ∃ b : M, b ∈ p ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp h in ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
/-- The bottom submodule is linearly equivalent to punit as an `R`-module. -/
@[simps] def bot_equiv_punit : (⊥ : submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] punit :=
{ to_fun := λ x, punit.star,
inv_fun := λ x, 0,
map_add' := by { intros, ext, },
map_smul' := by { intros, ext, },
left_inv := by { intro x, ext, },
right_inv := by { intro x, ext, }, }
lemma eq_bot_of_subsingleton (p : submodule R M) [subsingleton p] : p = ⊥ :=
begin
rw eq_bot_iff,
intros v hv,
exact congr_arg coe (subsingleton.elim (⟨v, hv⟩ : p) 0)
end
/-- The universal set is the top element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : has_top (submodule R M) :=
⟨{ carrier := set.univ, smul_mem' := λ _ _ _, trivial, .. (⊤ : add_submonoid M)}⟩
@[simp] lemma top_coe : ((⊤ : submodule R M) : set M) = set.univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma top_to_add_submonoid : (⊤ : submodule R M).to_add_submonoid = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_top {x : M} : x ∈ (⊤ : submodule R M) := trivial
section
variables (R)
@[simp] lemma restrict_scalars_top : restrict_scalars S (⊤ : submodule R M) = ⊤ := rfl
end
@[simp] lemma restrict_scalars_eq_top_iff {p : submodule R M} :
restrict_scalars S p = ⊤ ↔ p = ⊤ :=
by simp [set_like.ext_iff]
instance : order_top (submodule R M) :=
{ top := ⊤,
le_top := λ p x _, trivial }
lemma eq_top_iff' {p : submodule R M} : p = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ p :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨λ h x, h trivial, λ h x _, h x⟩
/-- The top submodule is linearly equivalent to the module.
This is the module version of `add_submonoid.top_equiv`. -/
@[simps] def top_equiv : (⊤ : submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ to_fun := λ x, x,
inv_fun := λ x, ⟨x, by simp⟩,
map_add' := by { intros, refl, },
map_smul' := by { intros, refl, },
left_inv := by { intro x, ext, refl, },
right_inv := by { intro x, refl, }, }
instance : has_Inf (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ S,
{ carrier := ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : set M),
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem],
add_mem' := by simp [add_mem] {contextual := tt},
smul_mem' := by simp [smul_mem] {contextual := tt} }⟩
private lemma Inf_le' {S : set (submodule R M)} {p} : p ∈ S → Inf S ≤ p :=
set.bInter_subset_of_mem
private lemma le_Inf' {S : set (submodule R M)} {p} : (∀q ∈ S, p ≤ q) → p ≤ Inf S :=
set.subset_Inter₂
instance : has_inf (submodule R M) :=
⟨λ p q,
{ carrier := p ∩ q,
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem],
add_mem' := by simp [add_mem] {contextual := tt},
smul_mem' := by simp [smul_mem] {contextual := tt} }⟩
instance : complete_lattice (submodule R M) :=
{ sup := λ a b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
le_sup_left := λ a b, le_Inf' $ λ x ⟨ha, hb⟩, ha,
le_sup_right := λ a b, le_Inf' $ λ x ⟨ha, hb⟩, hb,
sup_le := λ a b c h₁ h₂, Inf_le' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
inf := (⊓),
le_inf := λ a b c, set.subset_inter,
inf_le_left := λ a b, set.inter_subset_left _ _,
inf_le_right := λ a b, set.inter_subset_right _ _,
Sup := λtt, Inf {t | ∀t'∈tt, t' ≤ t},
le_Sup := λ s p hs, le_Inf' $ λ q hq, hq _ hs,
Sup_le := λ s p hs, Inf_le' hs,
Inf := Inf,
le_Inf := λ s a, le_Inf',
Inf_le := λ s a, Inf_le',
..submodule.order_top,
..submodule.order_bot,
..set_like.partial_order }
@[simp] theorem inf_coe : ↑(p ⊓ q) = (p ∩ q : set M) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inf {p q : submodule R M} {x : M} :
x ∈ p ⊓ q ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ q := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem Inf_coe (P : set (submodule R M)) : (↑(Inf P) : set M) = ⋂ p ∈ P, ↑p := rfl
@[simp] theorem finset_inf_coe {ι} (s : finset ι) (p : ι → submodule R M) :
(↑(s.inf p) : set M) = ⋂ i ∈ s, ↑(p i) :=
begin
letI := classical.dec_eq ι,
refine s.induction_on _ (λ i s hi ih, _),
{ simp },
{ rw [finset.inf_insert, inf_coe, ih],
simp },
end
@[simp] theorem infi_coe {ι} (p : ι → submodule R M) :
(↑⨅ i, p i : set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) :=
by rw [infi, Inf_coe]; ext a; simp; exact
⟨λ h i, h _ i rfl, λ h i x e, e ▸ h _⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_Inf {S : set (submodule R M)} {x : M} : x ∈ Inf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
set.mem_Inter₂
@[simp] theorem mem_infi {ι} (p : ι → submodule R M) {x} :
x ∈ (⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i :=
by rw [← set_like.mem_coe, infi_coe, set.mem_Inter]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_finset_inf {ι} {s : finset ι} {p : ι → submodule R M} {x : M} :
x ∈ s.inf p ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, x ∈ p i :=
by simp only [← set_like.mem_coe, finset_inf_coe, set.mem_Inter]
lemma mem_sup_left {S T : submodule R M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show S ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_left
lemma mem_sup_right {S T : submodule R M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show T ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_right
lemma add_mem_sup {S T : submodule R M} {s t : M} (hs : s ∈ S) (ht : t ∈ T) : s + t ∈ S ⊔ T :=
add_mem (mem_sup_left hs) (mem_sup_right ht)
lemma mem_supr_of_mem {ι : Sort*} {b : M} {p : ι → submodule R M} (i : ι) (h : b ∈ p i) :
b ∈ (⨆i, p i) :=
have p i ≤ (⨆i, p i) := le_supr p i,
@this b h
open_locale big_operators
lemma sum_mem_supr {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {f : ι → M} {p : ι → submodule R M}
(h : ∀ i, f i ∈ p i) :
∑ i, f i ∈ ⨆ i, p i :=
sum_mem $ λ i hi, mem_supr_of_mem i (h i)
lemma sum_mem_bsupr {ι : Type*} {s : finset ι} {f : ι → M} {p : ι → submodule R M}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ∈ p i) :
∑ i in s, f i ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, p i :=
sum_mem $ λ i hi, mem_supr_of_mem i $ mem_supr_of_mem hi (h i hi)
/-! Note that `submodule.mem_supr` is provided in `linear_algebra/basic.lean`. -/
lemma mem_Sup_of_mem {S : set (submodule R M)} {s : submodule R M}
(hs : s ∈ S) : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ s → x ∈ Sup S :=
show s ≤ Sup S, from le_Sup hs
theorem disjoint_def {p p' : submodule R M} :
disjoint p p' ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x ∈ p' → x = (0:M) :=
show (∀ x, x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' → x ∈ ({0} : set M)) ↔ _, by simp
theorem disjoint_def' {p p' : submodule R M} :
disjoint p p' ↔ ∀ (x ∈ p) (y ∈ p'), x = y → x = (0:M) :=
disjoint_def.trans ⟨λ h x hx y hy hxy, h x hx $ hxy.symm ▸ hy,
λ h x hx hx', h _ hx x hx' rfl⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_coe_mem_of_disjoint (hpq : disjoint p q) {a : p} (ha : (a : M) ∈ q) :
a = 0 :=
by exact_mod_cast disjoint_def.mp hpq a (coe_mem a) ha
end submodule
section nat_submodule
/-- An additive submonoid is equivalent to a ℕ-submodule. -/
def add_submonoid.to_nat_submodule : add_submonoid M ≃o submodule ℕ M :=
{ to_fun := λ S,
{ smul_mem' := λ r s hs, show r • s ∈ S, from nsmul_mem hs _, ..S },
inv_fun := submodule.to_add_submonoid,
left_inv := λ ⟨S, _, _⟩, rfl,
right_inv := λ ⟨S, _, _, _⟩, rfl,
map_rel_iff' := λ a b, iff.rfl }
@[simp]
lemma add_submonoid.to_nat_submodule_symm :
⇑(add_submonoid.to_nat_submodule.symm : _ ≃o add_submonoid M) = submodule.to_add_submonoid := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_submonoid.coe_to_nat_submodule (S : add_submonoid M) :
(S.to_nat_submodule : set M) = S := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_submonoid.to_nat_submodule_to_add_submonoid (S : add_submonoid M) :
S.to_nat_submodule.to_add_submonoid = S :=
add_submonoid.to_nat_submodule.symm_apply_apply S
@[simp]
lemma submodule.to_add_submonoid_to_nat_submodule (S : submodule ℕ M) :
S.to_add_submonoid.to_nat_submodule = S :=
add_submonoid.to_nat_submodule.apply_symm_apply S
end nat_submodule
end add_comm_monoid
section int_submodule
variables [add_comm_group M]
/-- An additive subgroup is equivalent to a ℤ-submodule. -/
def add_subgroup.to_int_submodule : add_subgroup M ≃o submodule ℤ M :=
{ to_fun := λ S,
{ smul_mem' := λ r s hs, S.zsmul_mem hs _, ..S},
inv_fun := submodule.to_add_subgroup,
left_inv := λ ⟨S, _, _, _⟩, rfl,
right_inv := λ ⟨S, _, _, _⟩, rfl,
map_rel_iff' := λ a b, iff.rfl }
@[simp]
lemma add_subgroup.to_int_submodule_symm :
⇑(add_subgroup.to_int_submodule.symm : _ ≃o add_subgroup M) = submodule.to_add_subgroup := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_subgroup.coe_to_int_submodule (S : add_subgroup M) :
(S.to_int_submodule : set M) = S := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_subgroup.to_int_submodule_to_add_subgroup (S : add_subgroup M) :
S.to_int_submodule.to_add_subgroup = S :=
add_subgroup.to_int_submodule.symm_apply_apply S
@[simp]
lemma submodule.to_add_subgroup_to_int_submodule (S : submodule ℤ M) :
S.to_add_subgroup.to_int_submodule = S :=
add_subgroup.to_int_submodule.apply_symm_apply S
end int_submodule
|
a6db698d23726f075cb27a0093ff278d3608d24f | e750538628490a3f5600df1edf4885819c33a4f3 | /Chain-BIRDS/Researcher/D23_update.sql.lean | a1b22683b4fb030b676bce73f39e418d4dba62d6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | cmli93/Chain-Dejima | 0c054cc8d2d28ebcd6b2f84f8b7ba45e0d88b5cf | 008d2748f0602b7d65bba8a9a86530e0899496ec | refs/heads/master | 1,634,811,960,801 | 1,551,677,784,000 | 1,551,677,784,000 | 173,666,288 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,210 | lean | import logic.basic
import tactic.basic
import tactic.finish
import tactic.interactive
import bx
import super
import smt2
universe u
open int
open auto
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable -- make all prop decidable
theorem disjoint_deltas {d23_researanddoc: string → string → Prop} {d2_researcher: string → string → string → string → Prop}: true → (∃ COL0 COL1 COL2 COL3, (((∃ MECHANISMOFACTION1, ((d2_researcher COL0 MECHANISMOFACTION1 COL2 COL3 ∧ d23_researanddoc COL0 COL1) ∧ COL3 = ('Yes':string)) ∧ MECHANISMOFACTION1 ≠ COL1) ∨ (∃ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, ((d2_researcher COL0 COL1 COL2 SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT ∧ ¬(∃ MECHANISMOFACTION, d23_researanddoc COL0 MECHANISMOFACTION)) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string)) ∧ COL3 = ('No':string))) ∨ ((d23_researanddoc COL0 COL1 ∧ ¬(∃ MECHANISMOFACTION MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, d2_researcher COL0 MECHANISMOFACTION MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT)) ∧ COL2 = ('to be added':string)) ∧ COL3 = ('Yes':string)) ∧ (d2_researcher COL0 COL1 COL2 COL3 ∧ ¬d23_researanddoc COL0 COL1) ∧ COL3 = ('Yes':string)) → false:=
begin
intro h,
try{rw[imp_false] at *},
try{simp at *},
revert h,
z3_smt,
end
theorem getput {d2_researcher: string → string → string → string → Prop}: true → (∃ COL0 COL1 COL2 COL3, (d2_researcher COL0 COL1 COL2 COL3 ∧ ¬(∃ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, (∃ MODEOFACTION, d2_researcher COL0 COL1 MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string))) ∧ COL3 = ('Yes':string)) ∨ (∃ COL0 COL1 COL2 COL3, ((∃ MECHANISMOFACTION1, ((d2_researcher COL0 MECHANISMOFACTION1 COL2 COL3 ∧ (∃ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, (∃ MODEOFACTION, d2_researcher COL0 COL1 MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string))) ∧ COL3 = ('Yes':string)) ∧ MECHANISMOFACTION1 ≠ COL1) ∨ (∃ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, ((d2_researcher COL0 COL1 COL2 SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT ∧ ¬(∃ COL1 SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, (∃ MODEOFACTION, d2_researcher COL0 COL1 MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string))) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string)) ∧ COL3 = ('No':string))) ∨ (((∃ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, (∃ MODEOFACTION, d2_researcher COL0 COL1 MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string)) ∧ ¬(∃ MECHANISMOFACTION MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, d2_researcher COL0 MECHANISMOFACTION MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT)) ∧ COL2 = ('to be added':string)) ∧ COL3 = ('Yes':string)) → false:=
begin
intro h,
try{rw[imp_false] at *},
try{simp at *},
revert h,
z3_smt,
end
theorem putget {d23_researanddoc: string → string → Prop} {d2_researcher: string → string → string → string → Prop}: true → (∀ MECHANISMOFACTION MEDICATIONNAME, (∃ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, (∃ COL2, d2_researcher MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION COL2 SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT ∧ ¬((d2_researcher MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION COL2 SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT ∧ ¬d23_researanddoc MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string)) ∨ ((∃ MECHANISMOFACTION1, ((d2_researcher MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION1 COL2 SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT ∧ d23_researanddoc MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string)) ∧ MECHANISMOFACTION1 ≠ MECHANISMOFACTION) ∨ (∃ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT', ((d2_researcher MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION COL2 SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT' ∧ ¬(∃ MECHANISMOFACTION, d23_researanddoc MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION)) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT' = ('Yes':string)) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('No':string))) ∨ ((d23_researanddoc MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION ∧ ¬(∃ MECHANISMOFACTION MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT, d2_researcher MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION MODEOFACTION SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT)) ∧ COL2 = ('to be added':string)) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string)) ∧ SHAREDWITHDOCTORORNOT = ('Yes':string)) ↔ d23_researanddoc MEDICATIONNAME MECHANISMOFACTION):=
begin
intro h,
try{rw[imp_false] at *},
try{simp at *},
revert h,
z3_smt,
end
|
843cd5b1ef682efef943b8fbb1ddb29638f68264 | 7b66d83f3b69dae0a3dfb684d7ebe5e9e3f3c913 | /src/solutions/thursday/afternoon/category_theory/exercise1.lean | db2b7f0875ba6537cf31aa92b9ba10c53d256dfc | [] | permissive | dpochekutov/lftcm2020 | 58a09e10f0e638075b97884d3c2612eb90296adb | cdfbf1ac089f21058e523db73f2476c9c98ed16a | refs/heads/master | 1,669,226,265,076 | 1,594,629,725,000 | 1,594,629,725,000 | 279,213,346 | 1 | 0 | MIT | 1,594,622,757,000 | 1,594,615,843,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,149 | lean | import algebra.category.CommRing
import category_theory.yoneda
open category_theory
open opposite
open polynomial
noncomputable theory
/-!
# Exercise 1
We show that the forgetful functor `CommRing ⥤ Type` is (co?)representable.
There are a sequence of hints available in
`hints/thursday/afternoon/category_theory/hintX.lean`, for `X = 1,2,3,4`.
-/
section exercise1
-- Because we'll be working with `polynomial ℤ`, which is in `Type 0`,
-- we just restrict to that universe for this exercise.
notation `CommRing` := CommRing.{0}
/-!
Before getting to the actual exercise,
I'm going to prove three facts about ring homomorphisms, which you may find useful.
You can just skip over them for now!
-/
lemma helper₀ (R S : CommRing) (f : R ⟶ S) (i : ℤ) :
f (algebra_map ℤ R i) = algebra_map ℤ S i :=
by simp
lemma helper₁ (R S : CommRing) (p : polynomial ℤ) (f : R ⟶ S) (r : R) :
eval₂ (algebra_map ℤ S) (f r) p = f (eval₂ (algebra_map ℤ R) r p) :=
begin
dsimp [eval₂, finsupp.sum],
simp only [f.map_sum, f.map_mul, f.map_pow, helper₀],
end
lemma helper₂ (R : CommRing) (p : polynomial ℤ) (f : polynomial ℤ →+* R) :
eval₂ (algebra_map ℤ R) (f X) p = f p :=
begin
dsimp [eval₂, finsupp.sum],
simp_rw [←helper₀ (CommRing.of (polynomial ℤ)) R f],
simp_rw [←f.map_pow, ←f.map_mul, ←f.map_sum],
congr,
conv_rhs { rw [←polynomial.sum_C_mul_X_eq p], },
simp [finsupp.sum],
end
/-!
One bonus hint before we start, showing you how to obtain the
ring homomorphism from `ℤ` into any commutative ring.
-/
example (R : CommRing) : ℤ →+* R :=
by library_search
/-!
The actual exercise!
-/
def CommRing_forget_representable : Σ (R : CommRing), (forget CommRing) ≅ coyoneda.obj (op R) :=
-- sorry
⟨CommRing.of (polynomial ℤ),
{ hom :=
{ app := λ R r, polynomial.eval₂_ring_hom (algebra_map ℤ R) r,
naturality' := λ R S f, by { ext r p, simp only [coe_eval₂_ring_hom, coe_comp], apply helper₁, }, },
inv :=
{ app := λ R f, by { dsimp at f, exact f X, }, },
inv_hom_id' := by { ext R f p, apply helper₂, }, }⟩
-- sorry
end exercise1
|
9221a175b91633a74af065b2580ffc398cf3f4f6 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /archive/sensitivity.lean | 5b96d7ddbffa0b326a310e8cb965487145cce625 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,684 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton, Johan Commelin, Jesse Han, Chris Hughes, Robert Y. Lewis,
Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Johan Commelin, Jesse Han, Chris Hughes, Robert Y. Lewis, Patrick Massot
-/
import tactic.fin_cases
import tactic.apply_fun
import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional
import linear_algebra.dual
import analysis.normed_space.basic
import data.real.sqrt
/-!
# Huang's sensitivity theorem
A formalization of Hao Huang's sensitivity theorem: in the hypercube of
dimension n ≥ 1, if one colors more than half the vertices then at least one
vertex has at least √n colored neighbors.
A fun summer collaboration by
Reid Barton, Johan Commelin, Jesse Han, Chris Hughes, Robert Y. Lewis, and Patrick Massot,
based on Don Knuth's account of the story
(https://www.cs.stanford.edu/~knuth/papers/huang.pdf),
using the Lean theorem prover (https://leanprover.github.io/),
by Leonardo de Moura at Microsoft Research, and his collaborators
(https://leanprover.github.io/people/),
and using Lean's user maintained mathematics library
(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib).
The project was developed at https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean-sensitivity and is now
archived at https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/blob/master/archive/sensitivity.lean
-/
/-! The next two lines assert we do not want to give a constructive proof,
but rather use classical logic. -/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
/-! We also want to use the notation `∑` for sums. -/
open_locale big_operators
notation `√` := real.sqrt
open function bool linear_map fintype finite_dimensional module.dual_bases
/-!
### The hypercube
Notations:
- `ℕ` denotes natural numbers (including zero).
- `fin n` = {0, ⋯ , n - 1}.
- `bool` = {`tt`, `ff`}.
-/
/-- The hypercube in dimension `n`. -/
@[derive [inhabited, fintype]] def Q (n : ℕ) := fin n → bool
/-- The projection from `Q (n + 1)` to `Q n` forgetting the first value
(ie. the image of zero). -/
def π {n : ℕ} : Q (n + 1) → Q n := λ p, p ∘ fin.succ
namespace Q
/-! `n` will always denote a natural number. -/
variable (n : ℕ)
/-- `Q 0` has a unique element. -/
instance : unique (Q 0) :=
⟨⟨λ _, tt⟩, by { intro, ext x, fin_cases x }⟩
/-- `Q n` has 2^n elements. -/
lemma card : card (Q n) = 2^n :=
by simp [Q]
/-! Until the end of this namespace, `n` will be an implicit argument (still
a natural number). -/
variable {n}
lemma succ_n_eq (p q : Q (n+1)) : p = q ↔ (p 0 = q 0 ∧ π p = π q) :=
begin
split,
{ rintro rfl, exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, },
{ rintros ⟨h₀, h⟩,
ext x,
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ rwa hx },
{ rw ← fin.succ_pred x hx,
convert congr_fun h (fin.pred x hx) } }
end
/-- The adjacency relation defining the graph structure on `Q n`:
`p.adjacent q` if there is an edge from `p` to `q` in `Q n`. -/
def adjacent {n : ℕ} (p : Q n) : set (Q n) := λ q, ∃! i, p i ≠ q i
/-- In `Q 0`, no two vertices are adjacent. -/
lemma not_adjacent_zero (p q : Q 0) : ¬ p.adjacent q :=
by rintros ⟨v, _⟩; apply fin_zero_elim v
/-- If `p` and `q` in `Q (n+1)` have different values at zero then they are adjacent
iff their projections to `Q n` are equal. -/
lemma adj_iff_proj_eq {p q : Q (n+1)} (h₀ : p 0 ≠ q 0) :
p.adjacent q ↔ π p = π q :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨i, h_eq, h_uni⟩,
ext x, by_contradiction hx,
apply fin.succ_ne_zero x,
rw [h_uni _ hx, h_uni _ h₀] },
{ intro heq,
use [0, h₀],
intros y hy,
contrapose! hy,
rw ←fin.succ_pred _ hy,
apply congr_fun heq }
end
/-- If `p` and `q` in `Q (n+1)` have the same value at zero then they are adjacent
iff their projections to `Q n` are adjacent. -/
lemma adj_iff_proj_adj {p q : Q (n+1)} (h₀ : p 0 = q 0) :
p.adjacent q ↔ (π p).adjacent (π q) :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨i, h_eq, h_uni⟩,
have h_i : i ≠ 0, from λ h_i, absurd h₀ (by rwa h_i at h_eq),
use [i.pred h_i,
show p (fin.succ (fin.pred i _)) ≠ q (fin.succ (fin.pred i _)),
by rwa fin.succ_pred],
intros y hy,
simp [eq.symm (h_uni _ hy)] },
{ rintros ⟨i, h_eq, h_uni⟩,
use [i.succ, h_eq],
intros y hy,
rw [←fin.pred_inj, fin.pred_succ],
{ apply h_uni,
change p (fin.pred _ _).succ ≠ q (fin.pred _ _).succ,
simp [hy] },
{ contrapose! hy,
rw [hy, h₀] },
{ apply fin.succ_ne_zero } }
end
@[symm] lemma adjacent.symm {p q : Q n} : p.adjacent q ↔ q.adjacent p :=
by simp only [adjacent, ne_comm]
end Q
/-! ### The vector space -/
/-- The free vector space on vertices of a hypercube, defined inductively. -/
def V : ℕ → Type
| 0 := ℝ
| (n+1) := V n × V n
namespace V
variables (n : ℕ)
/-! `V n` is a real vector space whose equality relation is computable. -/
instance : decidable_eq (V n) :=
by { induction n ; { dunfold V, resetI, apply_instance } }
instance : add_comm_group (V n) :=
by { induction n ; { dunfold V, resetI, apply_instance } }
instance : module ℝ (V n) :=
by { induction n ; { dunfold V, resetI, apply_instance } }
end V
/-- The basis of `V` indexed by the hypercube, defined inductively. -/
noncomputable def e : Π {n}, Q n → V n
| 0 := λ _, (1:ℝ)
| (n+1) := λ x, cond (x 0) (e (π x), 0) (0, e (π x))
@[simp] lemma e_zero_apply (x : Q 0) : e x = (1 : ℝ) := rfl
/-- The dual basis to `e`, defined inductively. -/
noncomputable def ε : Π {n : ℕ} (p : Q n), V n →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ
| 0 _ := linear_map.id
| (n+1) p := cond (p 0) ((ε $ π p).comp $ linear_map.fst _ _ _)
((ε $ π p).comp $ linear_map.snd _ _ _)
variable {n : ℕ}
lemma duality (p q : Q n) : ε p (e q) = if p = q then 1 else 0 :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ rw (show p = q, from subsingleton.elim p q),
dsimp [ε, e],
simp },
{ dsimp [ε, e],
cases hp : p 0 ; cases hq : q 0,
all_goals
{ repeat {rw cond_tt},
repeat {rw cond_ff},
simp only [linear_map.fst_apply, linear_map.snd_apply, linear_map.comp_apply, IH],
try { congr' 1, rw Q.succ_n_eq, finish },
try
{ erw (ε _).map_zero,
have : p ≠ q, { intro h, rw p.succ_n_eq q at h, finish },
simp [this] } } }
end
/-- Any vector in `V n` annihilated by all `ε p`'s is zero. -/
lemma epsilon_total {v : V n} (h : ∀ p : Q n, (ε p) v = 0) : v = 0 :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ dsimp [ε] at h, exact h (λ _, tt) },
{ cases v with v₁ v₂,
ext ; change _ = (0 : V n) ; simp only ; apply ih ; intro p ;
[ let q : Q (n+1) := λ i, if h : i = 0 then tt else p (i.pred h),
let q : Q (n+1) := λ i, if h : i = 0 then ff else p (i.pred h)],
all_goals
{ specialize h q,
rw [ε, show q 0 = tt, from rfl, cond_tt] at h <|>
rw [ε, show q 0 = ff, from rfl, cond_ff] at h,
rwa show p = π q, by { ext, simp [q, fin.succ_ne_zero, π] } } }
end
open module
/-- `e` and `ε` are dual families of vectors. It implies that `e` is indeed a basis
and `ε` computes coefficients of decompositions of vectors on that basis. -/
def dual_bases_e_ε (n : ℕ) : dual_bases (@e n) (@ε n) :=
{ eval := duality,
total := @epsilon_total _ }
/-! We will now derive the dimension of `V`, first as a cardinal in `dim_V` and,
since this cardinal is finite, as a natural number in `finrank_V` -/
lemma dim_V : module.rank ℝ (V n) = 2^n :=
have module.rank ℝ (V n) = (2^n : ℕ),
by { rw [dim_eq_card_basis (dual_bases_e_ε _).basis, Q.card]; apply_instance },
by assumption_mod_cast
instance : finite_dimensional ℝ (V n) :=
finite_dimensional.of_fintype_basis (dual_bases_e_ε _).basis
lemma finrank_V : finrank ℝ (V n) = 2^n :=
have _ := @dim_V n,
by rw ←finrank_eq_dim at this; assumption_mod_cast
/-! ### The linear map -/
/-- The linear operator $f_n$ corresponding to Huang's matrix $A_n$,
defined inductively as a ℝ-linear map from `V n` to `V n`. -/
noncomputable def f : Π n, V n →ₗ[ℝ] V n
| 0 := 0
| (n+1) := linear_map.prod
(linear_map.coprod (f n) linear_map.id)
(linear_map.coprod linear_map.id (-f n))
/-! The preceding definition uses linear map constructions to automatically
get that `f` is linear, but its values are somewhat buried as a side-effect.
The next two lemmas unbury them. -/
@[simp] lemma f_zero : f 0 = 0 := rfl
lemma f_succ_apply (v : V (n+1)) :
f (n+1) v = (f n v.1 + v.2, v.1 - f n v.2) :=
begin
cases v,
rw f,
simp only [linear_map.id_apply, linear_map.prod_apply, pi.prod, prod.mk.inj_iff,
linear_map.neg_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, linear_map.coprod_apply],
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
end
/-! In the next statement, the explicit conversion `(n : ℝ)` of `n` to a real number
is necessary since otherwise `n • v` refers to the multiplication defined
using only the addition of `V`. -/
lemma f_squared : ∀ v : V n, (f n) (f n v) = (n : ℝ) • v :=
begin
induction n with n IH; intro,
{ simpa only [nat.cast_zero, zero_smul] },
{ cases v, simp [f_succ_apply, IH, add_smul, add_assoc], abel }
end
/-! We now compute the matrix of `f` in the `e` basis (`p` is the line index,
`q` the column index). -/
lemma f_matrix :
∀ p q : Q n, |ε q (f n (e p))| = if q.adjacent p then 1 else 0 :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ intros p q,
dsimp [f],
simp [Q.not_adjacent_zero] },
{ intros p q,
have ite_nonneg : ite (π q = π p) (1 : ℝ) 0 ≥ 0,
{ split_ifs ; norm_num },
have f_map_zero := (show (V (n+0)) →ₗ[ℝ] (V n), from f n).map_zero,
dsimp [e, ε, f], cases hp : p 0 ; cases hq : q 0,
all_goals
{ repeat {rw cond_tt}, repeat {rw cond_ff},
simp [f_map_zero, hp, hq, IH, duality, abs_of_nonneg ite_nonneg, Q.adj_iff_proj_eq,
Q.adj_iff_proj_adj] } }
end
/-- The linear operator $g_m$ corresponding to Knuth's matrix $B_m$. -/
noncomputable def g (m : ℕ) : V m →ₗ[ℝ] V (m+1) :=
linear_map.prod (f m + √(m+1) • linear_map.id) linear_map.id
/-! In the following lemmas, `m` will denote a natural number. -/
variables {m : ℕ}
/-! Again we unpack what are the values of `g`. -/
lemma g_apply : ∀ v, g m v = (f m v + √(m+1) • v, v) :=
by delta g; simp
lemma g_injective : injective (g m) :=
begin
rw g,
intros x₁ x₂ h,
simp only [linear_map.prod_apply, linear_map.id_apply, prod.mk.inj_iff, pi.prod] at h,
exact h.right
end
lemma f_image_g (w : V (m + 1)) (hv : ∃ v, g m v = w) :
f (m + 1) w = √(m + 1) • w :=
begin
rcases hv with ⟨v, rfl⟩,
have : √(m+1) * √(m+1) = m+1 :=
real.mul_self_sqrt (by exact_mod_cast zero_le _),
simp [this, f_succ_apply, g_apply, f_squared, smul_add, add_smul, smul_smul],
abel
end
/-!
### The main proof
In this section, in order to enforce that `n` is positive, we write it as
`m + 1` for some natural number `m`. -/
/-! `dim X` will denote the dimension of a subspace `X` as a cardinal. -/
notation `dim ` X:70 := module.rank ℝ ↥X
/-! `fdim X` will denote the (finite) dimension of a subspace `X` as a natural number. -/
notation `fdim` := finrank ℝ
/-! `Span S` will denote the ℝ-subspace spanned by `S`. -/
notation `Span` := submodule.span ℝ
/-! `Card X` will denote the cardinal of a subset of a finite type, as a
natural number. -/
notation `Card ` X:70 := X.to_finset.card
/-! In the following, `⊓` and `⊔` will denote intersection and sums of ℝ-subspaces,
equipped with their subspace structures. The notations come from the general
theory of lattices, with inf and sup (also known as meet and join). -/
/-- If a subset `H` of `Q (m+1)` has cardinal at least `2^m + 1` then the
subspace of `V (m+1)` spanned by the corresponding basis vectors non-trivially
intersects the range of `g m`. -/
lemma exists_eigenvalue (H : set (Q (m + 1))) (hH : Card H ≥ 2^m + 1) :
∃ y ∈ Span (e '' H) ⊓ (g m).range, y ≠ (0 : _) :=
begin
let W := Span (e '' H),
let img := (g m).range,
suffices : 0 < dim (W ⊓ img),
{ simp only [exists_prop],
exact_mod_cast exists_mem_ne_zero_of_dim_pos this },
have dim_le : dim (W ⊔ img) ≤ 2^(m + 1),
{ convert ← dim_submodule_le (W ⊔ img),
apply dim_V },
have dim_add : dim (W ⊔ img) + dim (W ⊓ img) = dim W + 2^m,
{ convert ← dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq W img,
rw ← dim_eq_of_injective (g m) g_injective,
apply dim_V },
have dimW : dim W = card H,
{ have li : linear_independent ℝ (H.restrict e),
{ convert (dual_bases_e_ε _).basis.linear_independent.comp _ subtype.val_injective,
rw (dual_bases_e_ε _).coe_basis },
have hdW := dim_span li,
rw set.range_restrict at hdW,
convert hdW,
rw [← (dual_bases_e_ε _).coe_basis, cardinal.mk_image_eq (dual_bases_e_ε _).basis.injective,
cardinal.mk_fintype] },
rw ← finrank_eq_dim ℝ at ⊢ dim_le dim_add dimW,
rw [← finrank_eq_dim ℝ, ← finrank_eq_dim ℝ] at dim_add,
norm_cast at ⊢ dim_le dim_add dimW,
rw pow_succ' at dim_le,
rw set.to_finset_card at hH,
linarith
end
/-- **Huang sensitivity theorem** also known as the **Huang degree theorem** -/
theorem huang_degree_theorem (H : set (Q (m + 1))) (hH : Card H ≥ 2^m + 1) :
∃ q, q ∈ H ∧ √(m + 1) ≤ Card (H ∩ q.adjacent) :=
begin
rcases exists_eigenvalue H hH with ⟨y, ⟨⟨y_mem_H, y_mem_g⟩, y_ne⟩⟩,
have coeffs_support : ((dual_bases_e_ε (m+1)).coeffs y).support ⊆ H.to_finset,
{ intros p p_in,
rw finsupp.mem_support_iff at p_in,
rw set.mem_to_finset,
exact (dual_bases_e_ε _).mem_of_mem_span y_mem_H p p_in },
obtain ⟨q, H_max⟩ : ∃ q : Q (m+1), ∀ q' : Q (m+1), |(ε q' : _) y| ≤ |ε q y|,
from finite.exists_max _,
have H_q_pos : 0 < |ε q y|,
{ contrapose! y_ne,
exact epsilon_total (λ p, abs_nonpos_iff.mp (le_trans (H_max p) y_ne)) },
refine ⟨q, (dual_bases_e_ε _).mem_of_mem_span y_mem_H q (abs_pos.mp H_q_pos), _⟩,
let s := √(m+1),
suffices : s * |ε q y| ≤ ↑(_) * |ε q y|,
from (mul_le_mul_right H_q_pos).mp ‹_›,
let coeffs := (dual_bases_e_ε (m+1)).coeffs,
calc
s * |ε q y|
= |ε q (s • y)| :
by rw [map_smul, smul_eq_mul, abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (real.sqrt_nonneg _)]
... = |ε q (f (m+1) y)| : by rw [← f_image_g y (by simpa using y_mem_g)]
... = |ε q (f (m+1) (lc _ (coeffs y)))| : by rw (dual_bases_e_ε _).lc_coeffs y
... = |(coeffs y).sum (λ (i : Q (m + 1)) (a : ℝ), a • ((ε q) ∘ (f (m + 1)) ∘
λ (i : Q (m + 1)), e i) i)| :
by erw [(f $ m + 1).map_finsupp_total, (ε q).map_finsupp_total, finsupp.total_apply]
... ≤ ∑ p in (coeffs y).support, |(coeffs y p) * (ε q $ f (m+1) $ e p)| :
norm_sum_le _ $ λ p, coeffs y p * _
... = ∑ p in (coeffs y).support, |coeffs y p| * ite (q.adjacent p) 1 0 :
by simp only [abs_mul, f_matrix]
... = ∑ p in (coeffs y).support.filter (Q.adjacent q), |coeffs y p| :
by simp [finset.sum_filter]
... ≤ ∑ p in (coeffs y).support.filter (Q.adjacent q), |coeffs y q| :
finset.sum_le_sum (λ p _, H_max p)
... = (((coeffs y).support.filter (Q.adjacent q)).card : ℝ) * |coeffs y q| :
by rw [finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
... = (((coeffs y).support ∩ (Q.adjacent q).to_finset).card : ℝ) * |coeffs y q| :
by { congr' with x, simp, refl }
... ≤ (finset.card ((H ∩ Q.adjacent q).to_finset )) * |ε q y| :
begin
refine (mul_le_mul_right H_q_pos).2 _,
norm_cast,
apply finset.card_le_of_subset,
rw set.to_finset_inter,
convert finset.inter_subset_inter_right coeffs_support
end
end
|
569c27c15d223bd6cae250ac710d19d14d7506cc | 8eeb99d0fdf8125f5d39a0ce8631653f588ee817 | /src/tactic/slim_check.lean | 7add92ac9dfc5bf024c73f66122fd2a2c609ce2a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jesse-michael-han/mathlib | a15c58378846011b003669354cbab7062b893cfe | fa6312e4dc971985e6b7708d99a5bc3062485c89 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,200,760,912 | 1,602,081,753,000 | 1,602,081,753,000 | 181,787,230 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,460,682,000 | 1,555,460,682,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,168 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Simon Hudon
-/
import testing.slim_check.testable
import testing.slim_check.functions
import data.list.sort
/-!
## Finding counterexamples automatically using `slim_check`
A proposition can be tested by writing it out as:
```lean
example (xs : list ℕ) (w : ∃ x ∈ xs, x < 3) : ∀ y ∈ xs, y < 5 := by slim_check
-- ===================
-- Found problems!
-- xs := [0, 5]
-- x := 0
-- y := 5
-- -------------------
example (x : ℕ) (h : 2 ∣ x) : x < 100 := by slim_check
-- ===================
-- Found problems!
-- x := 258
-- -------------------
example (α : Type) (xs ys : list α) : xs ++ ys = ys ++ xs := by slim_check
-- ===================
-- Found problems!
-- α := ℤ
-- xs := [-4]
-- ys := [1]
-- -------------------
example : ∀ x ∈ [1,2,3], x < 4 := by slim_check
-- Success
```
In the first example, `slim_check` is called on the following goal:
```lean
xs : list ℕ,
h : ∃ (x : ℕ) (H : x ∈ xs), x < 3
⊢ ∀ (y : ℕ), y ∈ xs → y < 5
```
The local constants are reverted and an instance is found for
`testable (∀ (xs : list ℕ), (∃ x ∈ xs, x < 3) → (∀ y ∈ xs, y < 5))`.
The `testable` instance is supported by instances of `sampleable (list ℕ)`,
`decidable (x < 3)` and `decidable (y < 5)`. `slim_check` builds a
`testable` instance step by step with:
```
- testable (∀ (xs : list ℕ), (∃ x ∈ xs, x < 3) → (∀ y ∈ xs, y < 5))
-: sampleable (list xs)
- testable ((∃ x ∈ xs, x < 3) → (∀ y ∈ xs, y < 5))
- testable (∀ x ∈ xs, x < 3 → (∀ y ∈ xs, y < 5))
- testable (x < 3 → (∀ y ∈ xs, y < 5))
-: decidable (x < 3)
- testable (∀ y ∈ xs, y < 5)
-: decidable (y < 5)
```
`sampleable (list ℕ)` lets us create random data of type `list ℕ` in a way that
helps find small counter-examples. Next, the test of the proposition
hinges on `x < 3` and `y < 5` to both be decidable. The
implication between the two could be tested as a whole but it would be
less informative. Indeed, if we generate lists that only contain numbers
greater than `3`, the implication will always trivially hold but we should
conclude that we haven't found meaningful examples. Instead, when `x < 3`
does not hold, we reject the example (i.e. we do not count it toward
the 100 required positive examples) and we start over. Therefore, when
`slim_check` prints `Success`, it means that a hundred suitable lists
were found and successfully tested.
If no counter-examples are found, `slim_check` behaves like `admit`.
`slim_check` can also be invoked using `#eval`:
```lean
#eval slim_check.testable.check (∀ (α : Type) (xs ys : list α), xs ++ ys = ys ++ xs)
-- ===================
-- Found problems!
-- α := ℤ
-- xs := [-4]
-- ys := [1]
-- -------------------
```
For more information on writing your own `sampleable` and `testable`
instances, see `testing.slim_check.testable`.
-/
namespace tactic.interactive
open tactic slim_check
declare_trace slim_check.instance
declare_trace slim_check.decoration
declare_trace slim_check.discarded
declare_trace slim_check.success
declare_trace slim_check.shrink.steps
declare_trace slim_check.shrink.candidates .
open expr
/-- Tree structure representing a `testable` instance. -/
meta inductive instance_tree
| node : name → expr → list instance_tree → instance_tree
/-- Gather information about a `testable` instance. Given
an expression of type `testable ?p`, gather the
name of the `testable` instances that it is built from
and the proposition that they test. -/
meta def summarize_instance : expr → tactic instance_tree
| (lam n bi d b) := do
v ← mk_local' n bi d,
summarize_instance $ b.instantiate_var v
| e@(app f x) := do
`(testable %%p) ← infer_type e,
xs ← e.get_app_args.mmap_filter (try_core ∘ summarize_instance),
pure $ instance_tree.node e.get_app_fn.const_name p xs
| e := do
failed
/-- format a `instance_tree` -/
meta def instance_tree.to_format : instance_tree → tactic format
| (instance_tree.node n p xs) := do
xs ← format.join <$> (xs.mmap $ λ t, flip format.indent 2 <$> instance_tree.to_format t),
ys ← pformat!"testable ({p})",
pformat!"+ {n} :{format.indent ys 2}\n{xs}"
meta instance instance_tree.has_to_tactic_format : has_to_tactic_format instance_tree :=
⟨ instance_tree.to_format ⟩
/--
`slim_check` considers a proof goal and tries to generate examples
that would contradict the statement.
Let's consider the following proof goal.
```lean
xs : list ℕ,
h : ∃ (x : ℕ) (H : x ∈ xs), x < 3
⊢ ∀ (y : ℕ), y ∈ xs → y < 5
```
The local constants will be reverted and an instance will be found for
`testable (∀ (xs : list ℕ), (∃ x ∈ xs, x < 3) → (∀ y ∈ xs, y < 5))`.
The `testable` instance is supported by an instance of `sampleable (list ℕ)`,
`decidable (x < 3)` and `decidable (y < 5)`.
Examples will be created in ascending order of size (more or less)
The first counter-examples found will be printed and will result in an error:
```
===================
Found problems!
xs := [1, 28]
x := 1
y := 28
-------------------
```
If `slim_check` successfully tests 100 examples, it acts like
admit. If it gives up or finds a counter-example, it reports an error.
For more information on writing your own `sampleable` and `testable`
instances, see `testing.slim_check.testable`.
Optional arguments given with `slim_check_cfg`
* num_inst (default 100): number of examples to test properties with
* max_size (default 100): final size argument
* enable_tracing (default ff): enable the printing of discarded samples
Options:
* `set_option trace.slim_check.decoration true`: print the proposition with quantifier annotations
* `set_option trace.slim_check.discarded true`: print the examples discarded because they do not satisfy assumptions
* `set_option trace.slim_check.shrink.steps true`: trace the shrinking of counter-example
* `set_option trace.slim_check.shrink.candidates true`: print the lists of candidates considered when shrinking each variable
* `set_option trace.slim_check.instance true`: print the instances of `testable` being used to test the proposition
* `set_option trace.slim_check.success true`: print the tested samples that satisfy a property
-/
meta def slim_check (cfg : slim_check_cfg := {}) : tactic unit := do
{ tgt ← retrieve $ tactic.revert_all >> target,
let tgt' := tactic.add_decorations tgt,
let cfg := { cfg with
trace_discarded := cfg.trace_discarded || is_trace_enabled_for `slim_check.discarded,
trace_shrink := cfg.trace_shrink || is_trace_enabled_for `slim_check.shrink.steps,
trace_shrink_candidates := cfg.trace_shrink_candidates || is_trace_enabled_for `slim_check.shrink.candidates,
trace_success := cfg.trace_success || is_trace_enabled_for `slim_check.success },
inst ← mk_app ``testable [tgt'] >>= mk_instance <|>
fail!"Failed to create a `testable` instance for `{tgt}`.
What to do:
1. make sure that the types you are using have `sampleable` instances (you can use `#sample my_type` if you are unsure);
2. make sure that the relations and predicates that your proposition use are decidable;
3. make sure that instances of `testable` exist that, when combined, apply to your decorated proposition:
```
{tgt'}
```
Use `set_option trace.class_instances true` to understand what instances are missing.
Try this:
set_option trace.class_instances true
#check (by apply_instance : testable ({tgt'}))",
e ← mk_mapp ``testable.check [tgt, `(cfg), tgt', inst],
when_tracing `slim_check.decoration trace!"[testable decoration]\n {tgt'}",
when_tracing `slim_check.instance $ do
{ inst ← summarize_instance inst >>= pp,
trace!"\n[testable instance]{format.indent inst 2}" },
code ← eval_expr (io punit) e,
unsafe_run_io code,
admit }
end tactic.interactive
|
7b6846297ac4f62da944d9dc91467fb75c6addc3 | 206422fb9edabf63def0ed2aa3f489150fb09ccb | /src/topology/separation.lean | bc1feb6ee8a3d9ed7067fccb6288dc6bfb698ec0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hamdysalah1/mathlib | b915f86b2503feeae268de369f1b16932321f097 | 95454452f6b3569bf967d35aab8d852b1ddf8017 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,154,116,545 | 1,611,797,994,000 | 1,611,797,994,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,165 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Separation properties of topological spaces.
-/
import topology.subset_properties
open set filter
open_locale topological_space filter
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable -- TODO: use "open_locale classical"
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [topological_space α]
section separation
/--
`separated` is a predicate on pairs of sub`set`s of a topological space. It holds if the two
sub`set`s are contained in disjoint open sets.
-/
def separated : set α → set α → Prop :=
λ (s t : set α), ∃ U V : (set α), (is_open U) ∧ is_open V ∧
(s ⊆ U) ∧ (t ⊆ V) ∧ disjoint U V
namespace separated
open separated
@[symm] lemma symm {s t : set α} : separated s t → separated t s :=
λ ⟨U, V, oU, oV, aU, bV, UV⟩, ⟨V, U, oV, oU, bV, aU, disjoint.symm UV⟩
lemma comm (s t : set α) : separated s t ↔ separated t s :=
⟨symm, symm⟩
lemma empty_right (a : set α) : separated a ∅ :=
⟨_, _, is_open_univ, is_open_empty, λ a h, mem_univ a, λ a h, by cases h, disjoint_empty _⟩
lemma empty_left (a : set α) : separated ∅ a :=
(empty_right _).symm
lemma union_left {a b c : set α} : separated a c → separated b c → separated (a ∪ b) c :=
λ ⟨U, V, oU, oV, aU, bV, UV⟩ ⟨W, X, oW, oX, aW, bX, WX⟩,
⟨U ∪ W, V ∩ X, is_open_union oU oW, is_open_inter oV oX,
union_subset_union aU aW, subset_inter bV bX, set.disjoint_union_left.mpr
⟨disjoint_of_subset_right (inter_subset_left _ _) UV,
disjoint_of_subset_right (inter_subset_right _ _) WX⟩⟩
lemma union_right {a b c : set α} (ab : separated a b) (ac : separated a c) :
separated a (b ∪ c) :=
(ab.symm.union_left ac.symm).symm
end separated
/-- A T₀ space, also known as a Kolmogorov space, is a topological space
where for every pair `x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing one but not the other. -/
class t0_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(t0 : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → ∃ U:set α, is_open U ∧ (xor (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U)))
theorem exists_open_singleton_of_open_finset [t0_space α] (s : finset α) (sne : s.nonempty)
(hso : is_open (↑s : set α)) :
∃ x ∈ s, is_open ({x} : set α):=
begin
induction s using finset.strong_induction_on with s ihs,
by_cases hs : set.subsingleton (↑s : set α),
{ rcases sne with ⟨x, hx⟩,
refine ⟨x, hx, _⟩,
have : (↑s : set α) = {x}, from hs.eq_singleton_of_mem hx,
rwa this at hso },
{ dunfold set.subsingleton at hs,
push_neg at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩,
rcases t0_space.t0 x y hxy with ⟨U, hU, hxyU⟩,
wlog H : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U := hxyU using [x y, y x],
obtain ⟨z, hzs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s.filter (λ z, z ∈ U), is_open ({z} : set α),
{ refine ihs _ (finset.filter_ssubset.2 ⟨y, hy, H.2⟩) ⟨x, finset.mem_filter.2 ⟨hx, H.1⟩⟩ _,
rw [finset.coe_filter],
exact is_open_inter hso hU },
exact ⟨z, (finset.mem_filter.1 hzs).1, hz⟩ }
end
theorem exists_open_singleton_of_fintype [t0_space α] [f : fintype α] [ha : nonempty α] :
∃ x:α, is_open ({x}:set α) :=
begin
refine ha.elim (λ x, _),
have : is_open (↑(finset.univ : finset α) : set α), { simp },
rcases exists_open_singleton_of_open_finset _ ⟨x, finset.mem_univ x⟩ this with ⟨x, _, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
end
instance subtype.t0_space [t0_space α] {p : α → Prop} : t0_space (subtype p) :=
⟨λ x y hxy, let ⟨U, hU, hxyU⟩ := t0_space.t0 (x:α) y ((not_congr subtype.ext_iff_val).1 hxy) in
⟨(coe : subtype p → α) ⁻¹' U, is_open_induced hU, hxyU⟩⟩
/-- A T₁ space, also known as a Fréchet space, is a topological space
where every singleton set is closed. Equivalently, for every pair
`x ≠ y`, there is an open set containing `x` and not `y`. -/
class t1_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(t1 : ∀x, is_closed ({x} : set α))
lemma is_closed_singleton [t1_space α] {x : α} : is_closed ({x} : set α) :=
t1_space.t1 x
lemma is_open_compl_singleton [t1_space α] {x : α} : is_open ({x}ᶜ : set α) :=
is_closed_singleton
lemma is_open_ne [t1_space α] {x : α} : is_open {y | y ≠ x} :=
is_open_compl_singleton
instance subtype.t1_space {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [t1_space α] {p : α → Prop} :
t1_space (subtype p) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩, is_closed_induced_iff.2 $ ⟨{x}, is_closed_singleton, set.ext $ λ y,
by simp [subtype.ext_iff_val]⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance t1_space.t0_space [t1_space α] : t0_space α :=
⟨λ x y h, ⟨{z | z ≠ y}, is_open_ne, or.inl ⟨h, not_not_intro rfl⟩⟩⟩
lemma compl_singleton_mem_nhds [t1_space α] {x y : α} (h : y ≠ x) : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y :=
mem_nhds_sets is_closed_singleton $ by rwa [mem_compl_eq, mem_singleton_iff]
@[simp] lemma closure_singleton [t1_space α] {a : α} :
closure ({a} : set α) = {a} :=
is_closed_singleton.closure_eq
lemma is_closed_map_const {α β} [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [t1_space β] {y : β} :
is_closed_map (function.const α y) :=
begin
apply is_closed_map.of_nonempty, intros s hs h2s, simp_rw [h2s.image_const, is_closed_singleton]
end
lemma discrete_of_t1_of_finite {X : Type*} [topological_space X] [t1_space X] [fintype X] :
discrete_topology X :=
begin
apply singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp,
intros x,
rw [← is_closed_compl_iff, ← bUnion_of_singleton ({x} : set X)ᶜ],
exact is_closed_bUnion (finite.of_fintype _) (λ y _, is_closed_singleton)
end
lemma singleton_mem_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete {s : set α} [discrete_topology s]
{x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
{x} ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
begin
have : ({⟨x, hx⟩} : set s) ∈ 𝓝 (⟨x, hx⟩ : s), by simp [nhds_discrete],
simpa only [nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_coe hx, image_singleton]
using @image_mem_map _ _ _ (coe : s → α) _ this
end
lemma nhds_within_of_mem_discrete {s : set α} [discrete_topology s] {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] x = pure x :=
le_antisymm (le_pure_iff.2 $ singleton_mem_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete hx) (pure_le_nhds_within hx)
lemma filter.has_basis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
{ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {t : ι → set α} {s : set α} [discrete_topology s] {x : α}
(hb : (𝓝 x).has_basis p t) (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ i (hi : p i), t i ∩ s = {x} :=
begin
rcases (nhds_within_has_basis hb s).mem_iff.1 (singleton_mem_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete hx)
with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, subset.antisymm hix $ singleton_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_of_nhds $ hb.mem_of_mem hi, hx⟩⟩
end
/-- A point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a topological space admits a neighbourhood
that only meets `s` at `x`. -/
lemma nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {s : set α} [discrete_topology s]
{x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, U ∩ s = {x} :=
by simpa using (𝓝 x).basis_sets.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
/-- For point `x` in a discrete subset `s` of a topological space, there is a set `U`
such that
1. `U` is a punctured neighborhood of `x` (ie. `U ∪ {x}` is a neighbourhood of `x`),
2. `U` is disjoint from `s`.
-/
lemma disjoint_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete {s : set α} [discrete_topology s] {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ U ∈ 𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x, disjoint U s :=
let ⟨V, h, h'⟩ := nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx in
⟨{x}ᶜ ∩ V, inter_mem_nhds_within _ h,
(disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (by { rw [inter_assoc, h', compl_inter_self] }))⟩
/-- A T₂ space, also known as a Hausdorff space, is one in which for every
`x ≠ y` there exists disjoint open sets around `x` and `y`. This is
the most widely used of the separation axioms. -/
class t2_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] : Prop :=
(t2 : ∀x y, x ≠ y → ∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅)
lemma t2_separation [t2_space α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅ :=
t2_space.t2 x y h
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance t2_space.t1_space [t2_space α] : t1_space α :=
⟨λ x, is_open_iff_forall_mem_open.2 $ λ y hxy,
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hyu, hxv, huv⟩ := t2_separation (mt mem_singleton_of_eq hxy) in
⟨u, λ z hz1 hz2, (ext_iff.1 huv x).1 ⟨mem_singleton_iff.1 hz2 ▸ hz1, hxv⟩, hu, hyu⟩⟩
lemma eq_of_nhds_ne_bot [ht : t2_space α] {x y : α} (h : ne_bot (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y)) : x = y :=
classical.by_contradiction $ assume : x ≠ y,
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hx, hy, huv⟩ := t2_space.t2 x y this in
absurd huv $ (inf_ne_bot_iff.1 h (mem_nhds_sets hu hx) (mem_nhds_sets hv hy)).ne_empty
lemma t2_iff_nhds : t2_space α ↔ ∀ {x y : α}, ne_bot (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y) → x = y :=
⟨assume h, by exactI λ x y, eq_of_nhds_ne_bot,
assume h, ⟨assume x y xy,
have 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y = ⊥ := classical.by_contradiction (mt h xy),
let ⟨u', hu', v', hv', u'v'⟩ := empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mpr this,
⟨u, uu', uo, hu⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hu',
⟨v, vv', vo, hv⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hv' in
⟨u, v, uo, vo, hu, hv, disjoint.eq_bot $ disjoint.mono uu' vv' u'v'⟩⟩⟩
lemma t2_iff_ultrafilter :
t2_space α ↔ ∀ {x y : α} (f : ultrafilter α), ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x → ↑f ≤ 𝓝 y → x = y :=
t2_iff_nhds.trans $ by simp only [←exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_imp, le_inf_iff, exists_imp_distrib]
lemma is_closed_diagonal [t2_space α] : is_closed (diagonal α) :=
is_closed_iff_cluster_pt.mpr $ assume ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ h, eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ assume : 𝓝 a₁ ⊓ 𝓝 a₂ = ⊥, h $
let ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, (h' : t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ ∅)⟩ :=
by rw [←empty_in_sets_eq_bot, mem_inf_sets] at this; exact this in
begin
change t₁ ∈ 𝓝 a₁ at ht₁,
change t₂ ∈ 𝓝 a₂ at ht₂,
rw [nhds_prod_eq, ←empty_in_sets_eq_bot],
apply filter.sets_of_superset,
apply inter_mem_inf_sets (prod_mem_prod ht₁ ht₂) (mem_principal_sets.mpr (subset.refl _)),
exact assume ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, (heq : x₁ = x₂)⟩,
show false, from @h' x₁ ⟨hx₁, heq.symm ▸ hx₂⟩
end
lemma t2_iff_is_closed_diagonal : t2_space α ↔ is_closed (diagonal α) :=
begin
split,
{ introI h,
exact is_closed_diagonal },
{ intro h,
constructor,
intros x y hxy,
have : (x, y) ∈ (diagonal α)ᶜ, by rwa [mem_compl_iff],
obtain ⟨t, t_sub, t_op, xyt⟩ : ∃ t ⊆ (diagonal α)ᶜ, is_open t ∧ (x, y) ∈ t :=
is_open_iff_forall_mem_open.mp h _ this,
rcases is_open_prod_iff.mp t_op x y xyt with ⟨U, V, U_op, V_op, xU, yV, H⟩,
use [U, V, U_op, V_op, xU, yV],
have := subset.trans H t_sub,
rw eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
rintros z ⟨zU, zV⟩,
have : ¬ (z, z) ∈ diagonal α := this (mk_mem_prod zU zV),
exact this rfl },
end
section separated
open separated finset
lemma finset_disjoint_finset_opens_of_t2 [t2_space α] :
∀ (s t : finset α), disjoint s t → separated (s : set α) t :=
begin
refine induction_on_union _ (λ a b hi d, (hi d.symm).symm) (λ a d, empty_right a) (λ a b ab, _) _,
{ obtain ⟨U, V, oU, oV, aU, bV, UV⟩ := t2_separation
(by { rw [ne.def, ← finset.mem_singleton], exact (disjoint_singleton.mp ab.symm) }),
refine ⟨U, V, oU, oV, _, _, set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr UV⟩;
exact singleton_subset_set_iff.mpr ‹_› },
{ intros a b c ac bc d,
apply_mod_cast union_left (ac (disjoint_of_subset_left (a.subset_union_left b) d)) (bc _),
exact disjoint_of_subset_left (a.subset_union_right b) d },
end
lemma point_disjoint_finset_opens_of_t2 [t2_space α] {x : α} {s : finset α} (h : x ∉ s) :
separated ({x} : set α) ↑s :=
by exact_mod_cast finset_disjoint_finset_opens_of_t2 {x} s (singleton_disjoint.mpr h)
end separated
@[simp] lemma nhds_eq_nhds_iff {a b : α} [t2_space α] : 𝓝 a = 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨assume h, eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ by rw [h, inf_idem]; exact nhds_ne_bot, assume h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma nhds_le_nhds_iff {a b : α} [t2_space α] : 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
⟨assume h, eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ by rw [inf_of_le_left h]; exact nhds_ne_bot, assume h, h ▸ le_refl _⟩
lemma tendsto_nhds_unique [t2_space α] {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {a b : α}
[ne_bot l] (ha : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : a = b :=
eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ ne_bot_of_le $ le_inf ha hb
lemma tendsto_nhds_unique' [t2_space α] {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {a b : α}
(hl : ne_bot l) (ha : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : a = b :=
eq_of_nhds_ne_bot $ ne_bot_of_le $ le_inf ha hb
section lim
variables [t2_space α] {f : filter α}
/-!
### Properties of `Lim` and `lim`
In this section we use explicit `nonempty α` instances for `Lim` and `lim`. This way the lemmas
are useful without a `nonempty α` instance.
-/
lemma Lim_eq {a : α} [ne_bot f] (h : f ≤ 𝓝 a) :
@Lim _ _ ⟨a⟩ f = a :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (le_nhds_Lim ⟨a, h⟩) h
lemma Lim_eq_iff [ne_bot f] (h : ∃ (a : α), f ≤ nhds a) {a} : @Lim _ _ ⟨a⟩ f = a ↔ f ≤ 𝓝 a :=
⟨λ c, c ▸ le_nhds_Lim h, Lim_eq⟩
lemma ultrafilter.Lim_eq_iff_le_nhds [compact_space α] {x : α} {F : ultrafilter α} :
F.Lim = x ↔ ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨λ h, h ▸ F.le_nhds_Lim, Lim_eq⟩
lemma is_open_iff_ultrafilter' [compact_space α] (U : set α) :
is_open U ↔ (∀ F : ultrafilter α, F.Lim ∈ U → U ∈ F.1) :=
begin
rw is_open_iff_ultrafilter,
refine ⟨λ h F hF, h F.Lim hF F F.le_nhds_Lim, _⟩,
intros cond x hx f h,
rw [← (ultrafilter.Lim_eq_iff_le_nhds.2 h)] at hx,
exact cond _ hx
end
lemma filter.tendsto.lim_eq {a : α} {f : filter β} [ne_bot f] {g : β → α} (h : tendsto g f (𝓝 a)) :
@lim _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ f g = a :=
Lim_eq h
lemma filter.lim_eq_iff {f : filter β} [ne_bot f] {g : β → α} (h : ∃ a, tendsto g f (𝓝 a)) {a} :
@lim _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ f g = a ↔ tendsto g f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨λ c, c ▸ tendsto_nhds_lim h, filter.tendsto.lim_eq⟩
lemma continuous.lim_eq [topological_space β] {f : β → α} (h : continuous f) (a : β) :
@lim _ _ _ ⟨f a⟩ (𝓝 a) f = f a :=
(h.tendsto a).lim_eq
@[simp] lemma Lim_nhds (a : α) : @Lim _ _ ⟨a⟩ (𝓝 a) = a :=
Lim_eq (le_refl _)
@[simp] lemma lim_nhds_id (a : α) : @lim _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ (𝓝 a) id = a :=
Lim_nhds a
@[simp] lemma Lim_nhds_within {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ closure s) :
@Lim _ _ ⟨a⟩ (𝓝[s] a) = a :=
by haveI : ne_bot (𝓝[s] a) := mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt.1 h;
exact Lim_eq inf_le_left
@[simp] lemma lim_nhds_within_id {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ closure s) :
@lim _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ (𝓝[s] a) id = a :=
Lim_nhds_within h
end lim
/-!
### Instances of `t2_space` typeclass
We use two lemmas to prove that various standard constructions generate Hausdorff spaces from
Hausdorff spaces:
* `separated_by_continuous` says that two points `x y : α` can be separated by open neighborhoods
provided that there exists a continuous map `f`: α → β` with a Hausdorff codomain such that
`f x ≠ f y`. We use this lemma to prove that topological spaces defined using `induced` are
Hausdorff spaces.
* `separated_by_open_embedding` says that for an open embedding `f : α → β` of a Hausdorff space
`α`, the images of two distinct points `x y : α`, `x ≠ y` can be separated by open neighborhoods.
We use this lemma to prove that topological spaces defined using `coinduced` are Hausdorff spaces.
-/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance t2_space_discrete {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] : t2_space α :=
{ t2 := assume x y hxy, ⟨{x}, {y}, is_open_discrete _, is_open_discrete _, rfl, rfl,
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ by intros z hz;
cases eq_of_mem_singleton hz.1; cases eq_of_mem_singleton hz.2; cc⟩ }
lemma separated_by_continuous {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
[topological_space α] [topological_space β] [t2_space β]
{f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) {x y : α} (h : f x ≠ f y) :
∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅ :=
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, xu, yv, uv⟩ := t2_separation h in
⟨f ⁻¹' u, f ⁻¹' v, uo.preimage hf, vo.preimage hf, xu, yv,
by rw [←preimage_inter, uv, preimage_empty]⟩
lemma separated_by_open_embedding {α β : Type*} [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
[t2_space α] {f : α → β} (hf : open_embedding f) {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v : set β, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ f x ∈ u ∧ f y ∈ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅ :=
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, xu, yv, uv⟩ := t2_separation h in
⟨f '' u, f '' v, hf.is_open_map _ uo, hf.is_open_map _ vo,
mem_image_of_mem _ xu, mem_image_of_mem _ yv, by rw [image_inter hf.inj, uv, image_empty]⟩
instance {α : Type*} {p : α → Prop} [t : topological_space α] [t2_space α] : t2_space (subtype p) :=
⟨assume x y h, separated_by_continuous continuous_subtype_val (mt subtype.eq h)⟩
instance {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [t₁ : topological_space α] [t2_space α]
[t₂ : topological_space β] [t2_space β] : t2_space (α × β) :=
⟨assume ⟨x₁,x₂⟩ ⟨y₁,y₂⟩ h,
or.elim (not_and_distrib.mp (mt prod.ext_iff.mpr h))
(λ h₁, separated_by_continuous continuous_fst h₁)
(λ h₂, separated_by_continuous continuous_snd h₂)⟩
instance {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [t₁ : topological_space α] [t2_space α]
[t₂ : topological_space β] [t2_space β] : t2_space (α ⊕ β) :=
begin
constructor,
rintros (x|x) (y|y) h,
{ replace h : x ≠ y := λ c, (c.subst h) rfl,
exact separated_by_open_embedding open_embedding_inl h },
{ exact ⟨_, _, is_open_range_inl, is_open_range_inr, ⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩,
range_inl_inter_range_inr⟩ },
{ exact ⟨_, _, is_open_range_inr, is_open_range_inl, ⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩,
range_inr_inter_range_inl⟩ },
{ replace h : x ≠ y := λ c, (c.subst h) rfl,
exact separated_by_open_embedding open_embedding_inr h }
end
instance Pi.t2_space {α : Type*} {β : α → Type v} [t₂ : Πa, topological_space (β a)]
[∀a, t2_space (β a)] :
t2_space (Πa, β a) :=
⟨assume x y h,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := not_forall.mp (mt funext h) in
separated_by_continuous (continuous_apply i) hi⟩
instance sigma.t2_space {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Πi, topological_space (α i)]
[∀a, t2_space (α a)] :
t2_space (Σi, α i) :=
begin
constructor,
rintros ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ neq,
rcases em (i = j) with (rfl|h),
{ replace neq : x ≠ y := λ c, (c.subst neq) rfl,
exact separated_by_open_embedding open_embedding_sigma_mk neq },
{ exact ⟨_, _, is_open_range_sigma_mk, is_open_range_sigma_mk, ⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩, by tidy⟩ }
end
variables [topological_space β]
lemma is_closed_eq [t2_space α] {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : is_closed {x:β | f x = g x} :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.mp (hf.prod_mk hg) _ is_closed_diagonal
/-- If two continuous maps are equal on `s`, then they are equal on the closure of `s`. -/
lemma set.eq_on.closure [t2_space α] {s : set β} {f g : β → α} (h : eq_on f g s)
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
eq_on f g (closure s) :=
closure_minimal h (is_closed_eq hf hg)
/-- If two continuous functions are equal on a dense set, then they are equal. -/
lemma continuous.ext_on [t2_space α] {s : set β} (hs : dense s) {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) (h : eq_on f g s) :
f = g :=
funext $ λ x, h.closure hf hg (hs x)
lemma diagonal_eq_range_diagonal_map {α : Type*} : {p:α×α | p.1 = p.2} = range (λx, (x,x)) :=
ext $ assume p, iff.intro
(assume h, ⟨p.1, prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨rfl, h⟩⟩)
(assume ⟨x, hx⟩, show p.1 = p.2, by rw ←hx)
lemma prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint {α : Type*} {s t : set α} :
set.prod s t ⊆ {p:α×α | p.1 = p.2}ᶜ ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
by rw [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, subset_compl_comm,
diagonal_eq_range_diagonal_map, range_subset_iff]; simp
lemma compact_compact_separated [t2_space α] {s t : set α}
(hs : is_compact s) (ht : is_compact t) (hst : s ∩ t = ∅) :
∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ u ∩ v = ∅ :=
by simp only [prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint.symm] at ⊢ hst;
exact generalized_tube_lemma hs ht is_closed_diagonal hst
/-- In a `t2_space`, every compact set is closed. -/
lemma is_compact.is_closed [t2_space α] {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s) : is_closed s :=
is_open_compl_iff.mpr $ is_open_iff_forall_mem_open.mpr $ assume x hx,
let ⟨u, v, uo, vo, su, xv, uv⟩ :=
compact_compact_separated hs (compact_singleton : is_compact {x})
(by rwa [inter_comm, ←subset_compl_iff_disjoint, singleton_subset_iff]) in
have v ⊆ sᶜ, from
subset_compl_comm.mp (subset.trans su (subset_compl_iff_disjoint.mpr uv)),
⟨v, this, vo, by simpa using xv⟩
lemma is_compact.inter [t2_space α] {s t : set α} (hs : is_compact s) (ht : is_compact t) :
is_compact (s ∩ t) :=
hs.inter_right $ ht.is_closed
/-- If a compact set is covered by two open sets, then we can cover it by two compact subsets. -/
lemma is_compact.binary_compact_cover [t2_space α] {K U V : set α} (hK : is_compact K)
(hU : is_open U) (hV : is_open V) (h2K : K ⊆ U ∪ V) :
∃ K₁ K₂ : set α, is_compact K₁ ∧ is_compact K₂ ∧ K₁ ⊆ U ∧ K₂ ⊆ V ∧ K = K₁ ∪ K₂ :=
begin
rcases compact_compact_separated (compact_diff hK hU) (compact_diff hK hV)
(by rwa [diff_inter_diff, diff_eq_empty]) with ⟨O₁, O₂, h1O₁, h1O₂, h2O₁, h2O₂, hO⟩,
refine ⟨_, _, compact_diff hK h1O₁, compact_diff hK h1O₂,
by rwa [diff_subset_comm], by rwa [diff_subset_comm], by rw [← diff_inter, hO, diff_empty]⟩
end
section
open finset function
/-- For every finite open cover `Uᵢ` of a compact set, there exists a compact cover `Kᵢ ⊆ Uᵢ`. -/
lemma is_compact.finite_compact_cover [t2_space α] {s : set α} (hs : is_compact s)
{ι} (t : finset ι) (U : ι → set α) (hU : ∀ i ∈ t, is_open (U i)) (hsC : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
∃ K : ι → set α, (∀ i, is_compact (K i)) ∧ (∀i, K i ⊆ U i) ∧ s = ⋃ i ∈ t, K i :=
begin
classical,
induction t using finset.induction with x t hx ih generalizing U hU s hs hsC,
{ refine ⟨λ _, ∅, λ i, compact_empty, λ i, empty_subset _, _⟩, simpa only [subset_empty_iff,
finset.not_mem_empty, Union_neg, Union_empty, not_false_iff] using hsC },
simp only [finset.set_bUnion_insert] at hsC,
simp only [finset.mem_insert] at hU,
have hU' : ∀ i ∈ t, is_open (U i) := λ i hi, hU i (or.inr hi),
rcases hs.binary_compact_cover (hU x (or.inl rfl)) (is_open_bUnion hU') hsC
with ⟨K₁, K₂, h1K₁, h1K₂, h2K₁, h2K₂, hK⟩,
rcases ih U hU' h1K₂ h2K₂ with ⟨K, h1K, h2K, h3K⟩,
refine ⟨update K x K₁, _, _, _⟩,
{ intros i, by_cases hi : i = x,
{ simp only [update_same, hi, h1K₁] },
{ rw [← ne.def] at hi, simp only [update_noteq hi, h1K] }},
{ intros i, by_cases hi : i = x,
{ simp only [update_same, hi, h2K₁] },
{ rw [← ne.def] at hi, simp only [update_noteq hi, h2K] }},
{ simp only [set_bUnion_insert_update _ hx, hK, h3K] }
end
end
lemma locally_compact_of_compact_nhds [t2_space α] (h : ∀ x : α, ∃ s, s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ is_compact s) :
locally_compact_space α :=
⟨assume x n hn,
let ⟨u, un, uo, xu⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp hn in
let ⟨k, kx, kc⟩ := h x in
-- K is compact but not necessarily contained in N.
-- K \ U is again compact and doesn't contain x, so
-- we may find open sets V, W separating x from K \ U.
-- Then K \ W is a compact neighborhood of x contained in U.
let ⟨v, w, vo, wo, xv, kuw, vw⟩ :=
compact_compact_separated compact_singleton (compact_diff kc uo)
(by rw [singleton_inter_eq_empty]; exact λ h, h.2 xu) in
have wn : wᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x, from
mem_nhds_sets_iff.mpr
⟨v, subset_compl_iff_disjoint.mpr vw, vo, singleton_subset_iff.mp xv⟩,
⟨k \ w,
filter.inter_mem_sets kx wn,
subset.trans (diff_subset_comm.mp kuw) un,
compact_diff kc wo⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance locally_compact_of_compact [t2_space α] [compact_space α] : locally_compact_space α :=
locally_compact_of_compact_nhds (assume x, ⟨univ, mem_nhds_sets is_open_univ trivial, compact_univ⟩)
/-- In a locally compact T₂ space, every point has an open neighborhood with compact closure -/
lemma exists_open_with_compact_closure [locally_compact_space α] [t2_space α] (x : α) :
∃ (U : set α), is_open U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ is_compact (closure U) :=
begin
rcases locally_compact_space.local_compact_nhds x univ filter.univ_mem_sets with
⟨K, h1K, _, h2K⟩,
rw [mem_nhds_sets_iff] at h1K, rcases h1K with ⟨t, h1t, h2t, h3t⟩,
exact ⟨t, h2t, h3t, compact_of_is_closed_subset h2K is_closed_closure $
closure_minimal h1t $ h2K.is_closed⟩
end
/-- In a locally compact T₂ space, every compact set is contained in the interior of a compact
set. -/
lemma exists_compact_superset [locally_compact_space α] [t2_space α] {K : set α}
(hK : is_compact K) : ∃ (K' : set α), is_compact K' ∧ K ⊆ interior K' :=
begin
choose U hU using λ x : K, exists_open_with_compact_closure (x : α),
rcases hK.elim_finite_subcover U (λ x, (hU x).1) (λ x hx, ⟨_, ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩, (hU ⟨x, hx⟩).2.1⟩)
with ⟨s, hs⟩,
refine ⟨⋃ (i : K) (H : i ∈ s), closure (U i), _, _⟩,
exact (finite_mem_finset s).compact_bUnion (λ x hx, (hU x).2.2),
refine subset.trans hs _, rw subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open,
exact bUnion_subset_bUnion_right (λ x hx, subset_closure),
exact is_open_bUnion (λ x hx, (hU x).1)
end
end separation
section regularity
/-- A T₃ space, also known as a regular space (although this condition sometimes
omits T₂), is one in which for every closed `C` and `x ∉ C`, there exist
disjoint open sets containing `x` and `C` respectively. -/
class regular_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] extends t1_space α : Prop :=
(regular : ∀{s:set α} {a}, is_closed s → a ∉ s → ∃t, is_open t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ 𝓝[t] a = ⊥)
lemma nhds_is_closed [regular_space α] {a : α} {s : set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
∃t∈(𝓝 a), t ⊆ s ∧ is_closed t :=
let ⟨s', h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp h in
have ∃t, is_open t ∧ s'ᶜ ⊆ t ∧ 𝓝[t] a = ⊥,
from regular_space.regular (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr h₂) (not_not_intro h₃),
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂, ht₃⟩ := this in
⟨tᶜ,
mem_sets_of_eq_bot $ by rwa [compl_compl],
subset.trans (compl_subset_comm.1 ht₂) h₁,
is_closed_compl_iff.mpr ht₁⟩
lemma closed_nhds_basis [regular_space α] (a : α) :
(𝓝 a).has_basis (λ s : set α, s ∈ 𝓝 a ∧ is_closed s) id :=
⟨λ t, ⟨λ t_in, let ⟨s, s_in, h_st, h⟩ := nhds_is_closed t_in in ⟨s, ⟨s_in, h⟩, h_st⟩,
λ ⟨s, ⟨s_in, hs⟩, hst⟩, mem_sets_of_superset s_in hst⟩⟩
instance subtype.regular_space [regular_space α] {p : α → Prop} : regular_space (subtype p) :=
⟨begin
intros s a hs ha,
rcases is_closed_induced_iff.1 hs with ⟨s, hs', rfl⟩,
rcases regular_space.regular hs' ha with ⟨t, ht, hst, hat⟩,
refine ⟨coe ⁻¹' t, is_open_induced ht, preimage_mono hst, _⟩,
rw [nhds_within, nhds_induced, ← comap_principal, ← comap_inf, ← nhds_within, hat, comap_bot]
end⟩
variable (α)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance regular_space.t2_space [regular_space α] : t2_space α :=
⟨λ x y hxy,
let ⟨s, hs, hys, hxs⟩ := regular_space.regular is_closed_singleton
(mt mem_singleton_iff.1 hxy),
⟨t, hxt, u, hsu, htu⟩ := empty_in_sets_eq_bot.2 hxs,
⟨v, hvt, hv, hxv⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.1 hxt in
⟨v, s, hv, hs, hxv, singleton_subset_iff.1 hys,
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ λ z ⟨hzv, hzs⟩, htu ⟨hvt hzv, hsu hzs⟩⟩⟩
variable {α}
lemma disjoint_nested_nhds [regular_space α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ (U₁ V₁ ∈ 𝓝 x) (U₂ V₂ ∈ 𝓝 y), is_closed V₁ ∧ is_closed V₂ ∧ is_open U₁ ∧ is_open U₂ ∧
V₁ ⊆ U₁ ∧ V₂ ⊆ U₂ ∧ U₁ ∩ U₂ = ∅ :=
begin
rcases t2_separation h with ⟨U₁, U₂, U₁_op, U₂_op, x_in, y_in, H⟩,
rcases nhds_is_closed (mem_nhds_sets U₁_op x_in) with ⟨V₁, V₁_in, h₁, V₁_closed⟩,
rcases nhds_is_closed (mem_nhds_sets U₂_op y_in) with ⟨V₂, V₂_in, h₂, V₂_closed⟩,
use [U₁, V₁, mem_sets_of_superset V₁_in h₁, V₁_in,
U₂, V₂, mem_sets_of_superset V₂_in h₂, V₂_in],
tauto
end
end regularity
section normality
/-- A T₄ space, also known as a normal space (although this condition sometimes
omits T₂), is one in which for every pair of disjoint closed sets `C` and `D`,
there exist disjoint open sets containing `C` and `D` respectively. -/
class normal_space (α : Type u) [topological_space α] extends t1_space α : Prop :=
(normal : ∀ s t : set α, is_closed s → is_closed t → disjoint s t →
∃ u v, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ disjoint u v)
theorem normal_separation [normal_space α] (s t : set α)
(H1 : is_closed s) (H2 : is_closed t) (H3 : disjoint s t) :
∃ u v, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ disjoint u v :=
normal_space.normal s t H1 H2 H3
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normal_space.regular_space [normal_space α] : regular_space α :=
{ regular := λ s x hs hxs, let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hsu, hxv, huv⟩ :=
normal_separation s {x} hs is_closed_singleton
(λ _ ⟨hx, hy⟩, hxs $ mem_of_eq_of_mem (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm hx) in
⟨u, hu, hsu, filter.empty_in_sets_eq_bot.1 $ filter.mem_inf_sets.2
⟨v, mem_nhds_sets hv (singleton_subset_iff.1 hxv), u, filter.mem_principal_self u,
inter_comm u v ▸ huv⟩⟩ }
-- We can't make this an instance because it could cause an instance loop.
lemma normal_of_compact_t2 [compact_space α] [t2_space α] : normal_space α :=
begin
refine ⟨assume s t hs ht st, _⟩,
simp only [disjoint_iff],
exact compact_compact_separated hs.compact ht.compact st.eq_bot
end
end normality
/-- In a compact t2 space, the connected component of a point equals the intersection of all
its clopen neighbourhoods. -/
lemma connected_component_eq_Inter_clopen [t2_space α] [compact_space α] {x : α} :
connected_component x = ⋂ Z : {Z : set α // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}, Z :=
begin
apply eq_of_subset_of_subset connected_component_subset_Inter_clopen,
-- Reduce to showing that the clopen intersection is connected.
refine subset_connected_component _ (mem_Inter.2 (λ Z, Z.2.2)),
-- We do this by showing that any disjoint cover by two closed sets implies
-- that one of these closed sets must contain our whole thing. To reduce to the case
-- where the cover is disjoint on all of α we need that s is closed:
have hs : @is_closed _ _inst_1 (⋂ (Z : {Z : set α // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}), ↑Z),
{ exact is_closed_Inter (λ Z, Z.2.1.2) },
apply (is_preconnected_iff_subset_of_fully_disjoint_closed hs).2,
intros a b ha hb hab ab_empty,
haveI := @normal_of_compact_t2 α _ _ _,
-- Since our space is normal, we get two larger disjoint open sets containing the disjoint
-- closed sets. If we can show that our intersection is a subset of any of these we can then
-- "descend" this to show that it is a subset of either a or b.
rcases normal_separation a b ha hb (disjoint_iff.2 ab_empty) with ⟨u, v, hu, hv, hau, hbv, huv⟩,
-- If we can find a clopen set around x, contained in u ∪ v, we get a disjoint decomposition
-- Z = Z ∩ u ∪ Z ∩ v of clopen sets. The intersection of all clopen neighbourhoods will then lie
-- in whatever component x lies in and hence will be a subset of either u or v.
suffices : ∃ (Z : set α), is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z ∧ Z ⊆ u ∪ v,
{ cases this with Z H,
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at huv,
have H1 := is_clopen_inter_of_disjoint_cover_clopen H.1 H.2.2 hu hv huv,
rw [union_comm] at H,
rw [inter_comm] at huv,
have H2 := is_clopen_inter_of_disjoint_cover_clopen H.1 H.2.2 hv hu huv,
by_cases (x ∈ u),
-- The x ∈ u case.
{ left,
suffices : (⋂ (Z : {Z : set α // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}), ↑Z) ⊆ u,
{ rw [inter_comm, ←set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at huv,
replace hab : (⋂ (Z : {Z // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}), ↑Z) ≤ a ∪ b := hab,
replace this : (⋂ (Z : {Z // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}), ↑Z) ≤ u := this,
exact disjoint.left_le_of_le_sup_right hab (huv.mono this hbv) },
{ apply subset.trans _ (inter_subset_right Z u),
apply Inter_subset (λ Z : {Z : set α // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}, ↑Z)
⟨Z ∩ u, by {split, exact H1, apply mem_inter H.2.1 h}⟩ } },
-- If x ∉ u, we get x ∈ v since x ∈ u ∪ v. The rest is then like the x ∈ u case.
have h1 : x ∈ v,
{ cases (mem_union x u v).1 (mem_of_subset_of_mem (subset.trans hab
(union_subset_union hau hbv)) (mem_Inter.2 (λ i, i.2.2))) with h1 h1,
{ exfalso, apply h, exact h1},
{ exact h1} },
right,
suffices : (⋂ (Z : {Z : set α // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}), ↑Z) ⊆ v,
{ rw [←set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at huv,
replace hab : (⋂ (Z : {Z // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}), ↑Z) ≤ a ∪ b := hab,
replace this : (⋂ (Z : {Z // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}), ↑Z) ≤ v := this,
exact disjoint.left_le_of_le_sup_left hab (huv.mono this hau) },
{ apply subset.trans _ (inter_subset_right Z v),
apply Inter_subset (λ Z : {Z : set α // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}, ↑Z)
⟨Z ∩ v, by {split, exact H2, apply mem_inter H.2.1 h1}⟩ } },
-- Now we find the required Z. We utilize the fact that X \ u ∪ v will be compact,
-- so there must be some finite intersection of clopen neighbourhoods of X disjoint to it,
-- but a finite intersection of clopen sets is clopen so we let this be our Z.
have H1 := (is_compact.inter_Inter_nonempty (is_closed.compact
(is_closed_compl_iff.2 (is_open_union hu hv)))
(λ Z : {Z : set α // is_clopen Z ∧ x ∈ Z}, Z) (λ Z, Z.2.1.2)),
rw [←not_imp_not, not_forall, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, inter_comm] at H1,
have huv_union := subset.trans hab (union_subset_union hau hbv),
rw [← compl_compl (u ∪ v), subset_compl_iff_disjoint] at huv_union,
cases H1 huv_union with Zi H2,
refine ⟨(⋂ (U ∈ Zi), subtype.val U), _, _, _⟩,
{ exact is_clopen_bInter (λ Z hZ, Z.2.1) },
{ exact mem_bInter_iff.2 (λ Z hZ, Z.2.2) },
{ rwa [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, inter_comm, ←subset_compl_iff_disjoint, compl_compl] at H2 }
end
|
22ea6a4150e196057c73ad4bde8c43f9654f3b36 | abd677583c7e4d55daf9487b82da11b7c5498d8d | /src/lia.lean | 529a949c4c29fdb31c26a4eb8b2009dcf0467008 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jesse-michael-han/embed | e9c346918ad58e03933bdaa057a571c0cc4a7641 | c2fc188328e871e18e0dcb8258c6d0462c70a8c9 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,677,705,005 | 1,528,451,877,000 | 1,528,451,877,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 755 | lean | import .fol
namespace lia
variable {α : Type}
class is_symb (α : Type) extends prop.is_symb α :=
(eq : α) (lt : α) (gt : α) (pls : α) (mns : α)
def lt [is_symb α] (t s : exp α) := exp.app (exp.app (exp.cst (is_symb.lt α)) t) s
notation t `<'` s := eq t s
def eq [is_symb α] (t s : exp α) := exp.app (exp.app (exp.cst (is_symb.eq α)) t) s
notation t `='` s := lt t s
def gt [is_symb α] (t s : exp α) := exp.app (exp.app (exp.cst (is_symb.gt α)) t) s
notation t `>'` s := gt s
def pls [is_symb α] (t s : exp α) := exp.app (exp.app (exp.cst (is_symb.pls α)) t) s
notation t `+'` s := pls t s
def mns [is_symb α] (t s : exp α) := exp.app (exp.app (exp.cst (is_symb.mns α)) t) s
notation t `-'` s := mns t s
end lia
|
5a8e6fe6ca2d4cb0ffa9775d6d7a8ea05eafa94b | aa3f8992ef7806974bc1ffd468baa0c79f4d6643 | /tests/lean/t6.lean | 7460f313079ad9610c48cec99852b2c664ef6e3e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean | 7f8dff750722c5382bdd0a9a9275dc4bb2c58dd3 | 0cca265db19f7296531e339192e9b9bae4a31f8b | refs/heads/master | 1,610,909,964,159 | 1,407,084,399,000 | 1,416,857,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 334 | lean | definition Prop : Type.{1} := Type.{0}
section
variable {A : Type} -- Mark A as implicit parameter
variable R : A → A → Prop
definition id (a : A) : A := a
definition refl : Prop := forall (a : A), R a a
definition symm : Prop := forall (a b : A), R a b -> R b a
end
check id.{2}
check refl.{1}
check symm.{1}
|
8665d36177d361c89ff0b7b1ca206d8239bf09c6 | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/data/finset/basic.lean | 01844f841df6339671197a5ccca59f13b5430a98 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 90,438 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.multiset.finset_ops
import tactic.monotonicity
import tactic.apply
/-!
# Finite sets
mathlib has several different models for finite sets,
and it can be confusing when you're first getting used to them!
This file builds the basic theory of `finset α`,
modelled as a `multiset α` without duplicates.
It's "constructive" in the since that there is an underlying list of elements,
although this is wrapped in a quotient by permutations,
so anytime you actually use this list you're obligated to show you didn't depend on the ordering.
There's also the typeclass `fintype α`
(which asserts that there is some `finset α` containing every term of type `α`)
as well as the predicate `finite` on `s : set α` (which asserts `nonempty (fintype s)`).
-/
open multiset subtype nat
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure finset (α : Type*) :=
(val : multiset α)
(nodup : nodup val)
namespace finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩ ⟨t, _⟩ rfl := rfl
@[simp] theorem val_inj {s t : finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
⟨eq_of_veq, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_eq_self [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) : erase_dup s.1 = s.1 :=
erase_dup_eq_self.2 s.2
instance has_decidable_eq [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (finset α)
| s₁ s₂ := decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
/- membership -/
instance : has_mem α (finset α) := ⟨λ a s, a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s := iff.rfl
instance decidable_mem [h : decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : finset α) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
multiset.decidable_mem _ _
/-! ### set coercion -/
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : has_lift (finset α) (set α) := ⟨λ s, {x | x ∈ s}⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma mem_coe {a : α} {s : finset α} : a ∈ (↑s : set α) ↔ a ∈ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma set_of_mem {α} {s : finset α} : {a | a ∈ s} = ↑s := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mem {s : finset α} (x : (↑s : set α)) : ↑x ∈ s := x.2
@[simp] lemma mk_coe {s : finset α} (x : (↑s : set α)) {h} :
(⟨↑x, h⟩ : (↑s : set α)) = x :=
by { apply subtype.eq, refl, }
instance decidable_mem' [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : finset α) :
decidable (a ∈ (↑s : set α)) := s.decidable_mem _
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans $ nodup_ext s₁.2 s₂.2
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : (↑s₁ : set α) = ↑s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
lemma coe_injective {α} : function.injective (coe : finset α → set α) :=
λ s t, coe_inj.1
/-! ### subset -/
instance : has_subset (finset α) := ⟨λ s₁ s₂, ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂⟩
theorem subset_def {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁.1 ⊆ s₂.1 := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem subset.refl (s : finset α) : s ⊆ s := subset.refl _
theorem subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ := subset.trans
theorem superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ :=
λ h' h, subset.trans h h'
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
local attribute [trans] subset.trans superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ := mem_of_subset
theorem subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext $ λ a, ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} :
(↑s₁ : set α) ⊆ ↑s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := le_iff_subset s₁.2
instance : has_ssubset (finset α) := ⟨λa b, a ⊆ b ∧ ¬ b ⊆ a⟩
instance : partial_order (finset α) :=
{ le := (⊆),
lt := (⊂),
le_refl := subset.refl,
le_trans := @subset.trans _,
le_antisymm := @subset.antisymm _ }
theorem subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
@[simp] theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : (↑s₁ : set α) ⊂ ↑s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (↑s₁ : set α) ⊂ ↑s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁,
by simp only [set.ssubset_def, finset.coe_subset]
@[simp] theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff $ not_congr val_le_iff
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def nonempty (s : finset α) : Prop := ∃ x:α, x ∈ s
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonempty {s : finset α} : (↑s:set α).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty := iff.rfl
lemma nonempty.bex {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) : ∃ x:α, x ∈ s := h
lemma nonempty.mono {s t : finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.nonempty) : t.nonempty :=
set.nonempty.mono hst hs
/-! ### empty -/
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : finset α := ⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
instance : has_emptyc (finset α) := ⟨finset.empty⟩
instance : inhabited (finset α) := ⟨∅⟩
@[simp] theorem empty_val : (∅ : finset α).1 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : finset α) := id
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ :=
λ e, not_mem_empty a $ e ▸ h
theorem nonempty.ne_empty {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
exists.elim h $ λ a, ne_empty_of_mem
@[simp] theorem empty_subset (s : finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s := zero_subset _
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : finset α} (H : ∀x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
lemma eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl x; exact id, λ h, eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
@[simp] theorem val_eq_zero {s : finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := @val_inj _ s ∅
theorem subset_empty {s : finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : finset α} : s.nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.nonempty :=
classical.by_cases or.inl (λ h, or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h))
@[simp] lemma coe_empty : ↑(∅ : finset α) = (∅ : set α) := rfl
/-- A `finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
lemma eq_empty_of_not_nonempty (h : ¬ nonempty α) (s : finset α) : s = ∅ :=
finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $ λ x, false.elim $ not_nonempty_iff_imp_false.1 h x
/-! ### singleton -/
/--
`{a} : finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `decidable_eq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : has_singleton α (finset α) := ⟨λ a, ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : finset α).1 = a :: 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : finset α) ↔ b = a := mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : finset α) ↔ a ≠ b := not_congr mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : finset α) := or.inl rfl
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : ({a} : finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
⟨λ h, mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _), congr_arg _⟩
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : finset α).nonempty := ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
@[simp] theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : finset α) ≠ ∅ := (singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
@[simp] lemma coe_singleton (a : α) : ↑({a} : finset α) = ({a} : set α) := by { ext, simp }
lemma eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
begin
split; intro t,
rw t,
refine ⟨finset.mem_singleton_self _, λ _, finset.mem_singleton.1⟩,
ext, rw finset.mem_singleton,
refine ⟨t.right _, λ r, r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
end
lemma singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s :=
by simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, exists_unique]
lemma singleton_subset_set_iff {s : set α} {a : α} :
↑({a} : finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
by rw [coe_singleton, set.singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma singleton_subset_iff {s : finset α} {a : α} :
{a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
/-! ### cons -/
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `decidable_eq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons {α} (a : α) (s : finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : finset α :=
⟨a :: s.1, multiset.nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_cons {α a s h b} : b ∈ @cons α a s h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
by rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; apply list.mem_cons_iff
@[simp] theorem cons_val {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a :: s.1 := rfl
/-! ### disjoint union -/
/-- `disj_union s t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disj_union s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`.
It is the same as `s ∪ t`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The hypothesis
ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disj_union {α} (s t : finset α) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, a ∉ t) : finset α :=
⟨s.1 + t.1, multiset.nodup_add.2 ⟨s.2, t.2, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_disj_union {α s t h a} :
a ∈ @disj_union α s t h ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
by rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; rcases t with ⟨⟨t⟩⟩; apply list.mem_append
/-! ### insert -/
section decidable_eq
variables [decidable_eq α]
/-- `insert a s` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. -/
instance : has_insert α (finset α) := ⟨λ a s, ⟨_, nodup_ndinsert a s.2⟩⟩
theorem insert_def (a : α) (s : finset α) : insert a s = ⟨_, nodup_ndinsert a s.2⟩ := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_val (a : α) (s : finset α) : (insert a s).1 = ndinsert a s.1 := rfl
theorem insert_val' (a : α) (s : finset α) : (insert a s).1 = erase_dup (a :: s.1) :=
by rw [erase_dup_cons, erase_dup_eq_self]; refl
theorem insert_val_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).1 = a :: s.1 :=
by rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem h]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert {a b : α} {s : finset α} : a ∈ insert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s := mem_ndinsert
theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (s : finset α) : a ∈ insert a s := mem_ndinsert_self a s.1
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ insert b s :=
mem_ndinsert_of_mem h
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : finset α} (h : b ∈ insert a s) : b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
(mem_insert.1 h).resolve_left
@[simp] theorem cons_eq_insert {α} [decidable_eq α] (a s h) : @cons α a s h = insert a s :=
ext $ λ a, by simp
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_insert (a : α) (s : finset α) :
↑(insert a s) = (insert a ↑s : set α) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_coe, mem_insert, set.mem_insert_iff]
instance : is_lawful_singleton α (finset α) := ⟨λ a, by { ext, simp }⟩
@[simp] theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
eq_of_veq $ ndinsert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem insert_singleton_self_eq (a : α) : ({a, a} : finset α) = {a} :=
insert_eq_of_mem $ mem_singleton_self _
theorem insert.comm (a b : α) (s : finset α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_insert, or.left_comm]
theorem insert_singleton_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : finset α) = {b, a} :=
begin
ext,
simp [or.comm]
end
@[simp] theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : finset α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_insert, or.assoc.symm, or_self]
@[simp] theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : finset α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
ne_empty_of_mem (mem_insert_self a s)
lemma ne_insert_of_not_mem (s t : finset α) {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
s ≠ insert a t :=
by { contrapose! h, simp [h] }
theorem insert_subset {a : α} {s t : finset α} : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
by simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, forall_eq, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem subset_insert (a : α) (s : finset α) : s ⊆ insert a s :=
λ b, mem_insert_of_mem
theorem insert_subset_insert (a : α) {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
insert_subset.2 ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, subset.trans h (subset_insert _ _)⟩
lemma ssubset_iff {s t : finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ (∃a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t) :=
by exact_mod_cast @set.ssubset_iff_insert α ↑s ↑t
lemma ssubset_insert {s : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff.mpr ⟨a, h, subset.refl _⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem induction {α : Type*} {p : finset α → Prop} [decidable_eq α]
(h₁ : p ∅) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : ∀ s, p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ := multiset.induction_on s (λ _, h₁) (λ a s IH nd, begin
cases nodup_cons.1 nd with m nd',
rw [← (eq_of_veq _ : insert a (finset.mk s _) = ⟨a::s, nd⟩)],
{ exact h₂ (by exact m) (IH nd') },
{ rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem m] }
end) nd
/--
To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `finset α`,
then it holds for the `finset` obtained by inserting a new element.
-/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on {α : Type*} {p : finset α → Prop} [decidable_eq α]
(s : finset α) (h₁ : p ∅) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
finset.induction h₁ h₂ s
/-- Inserting an element to a finite set is equivalent to the option type. -/
def subtype_insert_equiv_option {t : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
{i // i ∈ insert x t} ≃ option {i // i ∈ t} :=
begin
refine
{ to_fun := λ y, if h : ↑y = x then none else some ⟨y, (mem_insert.mp y.2).resolve_left h⟩,
inv_fun := λ y, y.elim ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ _⟩ $ λ z, ⟨z, mem_insert_of_mem z.2⟩,
.. },
{ intro y, by_cases h : ↑y = x,
simp only [subtype.ext_iff, h, option.elim, dif_pos, subtype.coe_mk],
simp only [h, option.elim, dif_neg, not_false_iff, subtype.coe_eta, subtype.coe_mk] },
{ rintro (_|y), simp only [option.elim, dif_pos, subtype.coe_mk],
have : ↑y ≠ x, { rintro ⟨⟩, exact h y.2 },
simp only [this, option.elim, subtype.eta, dif_neg, not_false_iff, subtype.coe_eta,
subtype.coe_mk] },
end
/-! ### union -/
/-- `s ∪ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∪ t` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : has_union (finset α) := ⟨λ s₁ s₂, ⟨_, nodup_ndunion s₁.1 s₂.2⟩⟩
theorem union_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).1 = ndunion s₁.1 s₂.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem union_val (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∪ s₂.1 :=
ndunion_eq_union s₁.2
@[simp] theorem mem_union {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ := mem_ndunion
@[simp] theorem disj_union_eq_union {α} [decidable_eq α] (s t h) : @disj_union α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext $ λ a, by simp
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {s₁ : finset α} (s₂ : finset α) (h : a ∈ s₁) : a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂ :=
mem_union.2 $ or.inl h
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} {s₂ : finset α} (s₁ : finset α) (h : a ∈ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂ :=
mem_union.2 $ or.inr h
theorem not_mem_union {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : a ∉ s₁ ∪ s₂ ↔ a ∉ s₁ ∧ a ∉ s₂ :=
by rw [mem_union, not_or_distrib]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_union (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∪ s₂) = (↑s₁ ∪ ↑s₂ : set α) := set.ext $ λ x, mem_union
theorem union_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₃) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ⊆ s₃ :=
val_le_iff.1 (ndunion_le.2 ⟨h₁, val_le_iff.2 h₂⟩)
theorem subset_union_left (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := λ x, mem_union_left _
theorem subset_union_right (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₂ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := λ x, mem_union_right _
lemma union_subset_union {s1 t1 s2 t2 : finset α} (h1 : s1 ⊆ t1) (h2 : s2 ⊆ t2) :
s1 ∪ s2 ⊆ t1 ∪ t2 :=
by { intros x hx, rw finset.mem_union at hx ⊢, tauto }
theorem union_comm (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ = s₂ ∪ s₁ :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_union, or_comm]
instance : is_commutative (finset α) (∪) := ⟨union_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem union_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc]
instance : is_associative (finset α) (∪) := ⟨union_assoc⟩
@[simp] theorem union_idempotent (s : finset α) : s ∪ s = s :=
ext $ λ _, mem_union.trans $ or_self _
instance : is_idempotent (finset α) (∪) := ⟨union_idempotent⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_union, or.left_comm]
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc, or_comm (x ∈ s₂)]
theorem union_self (s : finset α) : s ∪ s = s := union_idempotent s
@[simp] theorem union_empty (s : finset α) : s ∪ ∅ = s :=
ext $ λ x, mem_union.trans $ or_false _
@[simp] theorem empty_union (s : finset α) : ∅ ∪ s = s :=
ext $ λ x, mem_union.trans $ false_or _
theorem insert_eq (a : α) (s : finset α) : insert a s = {a} ∪ s := rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_union (a : α) (s t : finset α) : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
by simp only [insert_eq, union_assoc]
@[simp] theorem union_insert (a : α) (s t : finset α) : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
by simp only [insert_eq, union_left_comm]
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : finset α) :
insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t :=
by simp only [insert_union, union_insert, insert_idem]
@[simp] lemma union_eq_left_iff_subset {s t : finset α} :
s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
have : t ⊆ s ∪ t := subset_union_right _ _,
rwa h at this },
{ assume h,
exact subset.antisymm (union_subset (subset.refl _) h) (subset_union_left _ _) }
end
@[simp] lemma left_eq_union_iff_subset {s t : finset α} :
s = s ∪ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
by rw [← union_eq_left_iff_subset, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma union_eq_right_iff_subset {s t : finset α} :
t ∪ s = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
by rw [union_comm, union_eq_left_iff_subset]
@[simp] lemma right_eq_union_iff_subset {s t : finset α} :
s = t ∪ s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
by rw [← union_eq_right_iff_subset, eq_comm]
/-! ### inter -/
/-- `s ∩ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∩ t` iff `a ∈ s` and `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : has_inter (finset α) := ⟨λ s₁ s₂, ⟨_, nodup_ndinter s₂.1 s₁.2⟩⟩
theorem inter_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = ndinter s₁.1 s₂.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_val (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∩ s₂.1 :=
ndinter_eq_inter s₁.2
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ := mem_ndinter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) :
a ∈ s₁ := (mem_inter.1 h).1
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) :
a ∈ s₂ := (mem_inter.1 h).2
theorem mem_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
and_imp.1 mem_inter.2
theorem inter_subset_left (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₁ := λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem inter_subset_right (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₂ := λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∩ s₃ :=
by simp only [subset_iff, mem_inter] {contextual:=tt}; intros; split; trivial
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_inter (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∩ s₂) = (↑s₁ ∩ ↑s₂ : set α) := set.ext $ λ _, mem_inter
@[simp] theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
by rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, set.union_inter_cancel_left]
@[simp] theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
by rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, set.union_inter_cancel_right]
theorem inter_comm (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₂ ∩ s₁ :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_inter, and_comm]
@[simp] theorem inter_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_inter, and.left_comm]
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_inter, and.right_comm]
@[simp] theorem inter_self (s : finset α) : s ∩ s = s :=
ext $ λ _, mem_inter.trans $ and_self _
@[simp] theorem inter_empty (s : finset α) : s ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext $ λ _, mem_inter.trans $ and_false _
@[simp] theorem empty_inter (s : finset α) : ∅ ∩ s = ∅ :=
ext $ λ _, mem_inter.trans $ false_and _
@[simp] lemma inter_union_self (s t : finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ s) = s :=
by rw [inter_comm, union_inter_cancel_right]
@[simp] theorem insert_inter_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
ext $ λ x, have x = a ∨ x ∈ s₂ ↔ x ∈ s₂, from or_iff_right_of_imp $ by rintro rfl; exact h,
by simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_distrib_left, this]
@[simp] theorem inter_insert_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_mem h, inter_comm]
@[simp] theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
ext $ λ x, have ¬ (x = a ∧ x ∈ s₂), by rintro ⟨rfl, H⟩; exact h H,
by simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_distrib_right, this, false_or]
@[simp] theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_not_mem h, inter_comm]
@[simp] theorem singleton_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (H : a ∈ s) : {a} ∩ s = {a} :=
show insert a ∅ ∩ s = insert a ∅, by rw [insert_inter_of_mem H, empty_inter]
@[simp] theorem singleton_inter_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (H : a ∉ s) : {a} ∩ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $ by simp only [mem_inter, mem_singleton]; rintro x ⟨rfl, h⟩; exact H h
@[simp] theorem inter_singleton_of_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ {a} = {a} :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp] theorem inter_singleton_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ {a} = ∅ :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
@[mono]
lemma inter_subset_inter {x y s t : finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) (h' : s ⊆ t) : x ∩ s ⊆ y ∩ t :=
begin
intros a a_in,
rw finset.mem_inter at a_in ⊢,
exact ⟨h a_in.1, h' a_in.2⟩
end
lemma inter_subset_inter_right {x y s : finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) : x ∩ s ⊆ y ∩ s :=
finset.inter_subset_inter h (finset.subset.refl _)
lemma inter_subset_inter_left {x y s : finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) : s ∩ x ⊆ s ∩ y :=
finset.inter_subset_inter (finset.subset.refl _) h
/-! ### lattice laws -/
instance : lattice (finset α) :=
{ sup := (∪),
sup_le := assume a b c, union_subset,
le_sup_left := subset_union_left,
le_sup_right := subset_union_right,
inf := (∩),
le_inf := assume a b c, subset_inter,
inf_le_left := inter_subset_left,
inf_le_right := inter_subset_right,
..finset.partial_order }
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_union (s t : finset α) : s ⊔ t = s ∪ t := rfl
@[simp] theorem inf_eq_inter (s t : finset α) : s ⊓ t = s ∩ t := rfl
instance : semilattice_inf_bot (finset α) :=
{ bot := ∅, bot_le := empty_subset, ..finset.lattice }
instance {α : Type*} [decidable_eq α] : semilattice_sup_bot (finset α) :=
{ ..finset.semilattice_inf_bot, ..finset.lattice }
instance : distrib_lattice (finset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := assume a b c, show (a ∪ b) ∩ (a ∪ c) ⊆ a ∪ b ∩ c,
by simp only [subset_iff, mem_inter, mem_union, and_imp, or_imp_distrib] {contextual:=tt};
simp only [true_or, imp_true_iff, true_and, or_true],
..finset.lattice }
theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) := inf_sup_left
theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : finset α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) := inf_sup_right
theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : finset α) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) := sup_inf_left
theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : finset α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) := sup_inf_right
lemma union_eq_empty_iff (A B : finset α) : A ∪ B = ∅ ↔ A = ∅ ∧ B = ∅ := sup_eq_bot_iff
/-! ### erase -/
/-- `erase s a` is the set `s - {a}`, that is, the elements of `s` which are
not equal to `a`. -/
def erase (s : finset α) (a : α) : finset α := ⟨_, nodup_erase_of_nodup a s.2⟩
@[simp] theorem erase_val (s : finset α) (a : α) : (erase s a).1 = s.1.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_erase {a b : α} {s : finset α} : a ∈ erase s b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ s :=
mem_erase_iff_of_nodup s.2
theorem not_mem_erase (a : α) (s : finset α) : a ∉ erase s a := mem_erase_of_nodup s.2
@[simp] theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ := rfl
theorem ne_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : finset α} : b ∈ erase s a → b ≠ a :=
by simp only [mem_erase]; exact and.left
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : finset α} : b ∈ erase s a → b ∈ s := mem_of_mem_erase
theorem mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem {a b : α} {s : finset α} : a ≠ b → a ∈ s → a ∈ erase s b :=
by simp only [mem_erase]; exact and.intro
/-- An element of `s` that is not an element of `erase s a` must be
`a`. -/
lemma eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : finset α} (hs : b ∈ s)
(hsa : b ∉ s.erase a) : b = a :=
begin
rw [mem_erase, not_and] at hsa,
exact not_imp_not.mp hsa hs
end
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s :=
ext $ assume x, by simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_distrib_left, not_and_self, false_or];
apply and_iff_right_of_imp; rintro H rfl; exact h H
theorem insert_erase {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext $ assume x, by simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_distrib_left, dec_em, true_and];
apply or_iff_right_of_imp; rintro rfl; exact h
theorem erase_subset_erase (a : α) {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : erase s a ⊆ erase t a :=
val_le_iff.1 $ erase_le_erase _ $ val_le_iff.2 h
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : finset α) : erase s a ⊆ s := erase_subset _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_erase (a : α) (s : finset α) : ↑(erase s a) = (↑s \ {a} : set α) :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_erase.trans $ by rw [and_comm, set.mem_diff, set.mem_singleton_iff]; refl
lemma erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) : ssubset_insert $ not_mem_erase _ _
... = _ : insert_erase h
theorem erase_eq_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase s a = s :=
eq_of_veq $ erase_of_not_mem h
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t :=
by simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp];
exact forall_congr (λ x, forall_swap)
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 $ subset.refl _
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 $ subset.refl _
/-! ### sdiff -/
/-- `s \ t` is the set consisting of the elements of `s` that are not in `t`. -/
instance : has_sdiff (finset α) := ⟨λs₁ s₂, ⟨s₁.1 - s₂.1, nodup_of_le (sub_le_self _ _) s₁.2⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sdiff {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : finset α} :
a ∈ s₁ \ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∉ s₂ := mem_sub_of_nodup s₁.2
lemma not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right {a : α} {s t : finset α} (h : a ∈ t) : a ∉ s \ t :=
by simp only [mem_sdiff, h, not_true, not_false_iff, and_false]
theorem sdiff_union_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : (s₂ \ s₁) ∪ s₁ = s₂ :=
ext $ λ a, by simpa only [mem_sdiff, mem_union, or_comm,
or_and_distrib_left, dec_em, and_true] using or_iff_right_of_imp (@h a)
theorem union_sdiff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ \ s₁) = s₂ :=
(union_comm _ _).trans (sdiff_union_of_subset h)
theorem inter_sdiff (s t u : finset α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = s ∩ t \ u :=
by { ext x, simp [and_assoc] }
@[simp] theorem inter_sdiff_self (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ \ s₁) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $
by simp only [mem_inter, mem_sdiff]; rintro x ⟨h, _, hn⟩; exact hn h
@[simp] theorem sdiff_inter_self (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₂ \ s₁) ∩ s₁ = ∅ :=
(inter_comm _ _).trans (inter_sdiff_self _ _)
@[simp] theorem sdiff_self (s₁ : finset α) : s₁ \ s₁ = ∅ :=
by ext; simp
theorem sdiff_inter_distrib_right (s₁ s₂ s₃ : finset α) : s₁ \ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = (s₁ \ s₂) ∪ (s₁ \ s₃) :=
by ext; simp only [and_or_distrib_left, mem_union, not_and_distrib, mem_sdiff, mem_inter]
@[simp] theorem sdiff_inter_self_left (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ \ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = s₁ \ s₂ :=
by simp only [sdiff_inter_distrib_right, sdiff_self, empty_union]
@[simp] theorem sdiff_inter_self_right (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : s₁ \ (s₂ ∩ s₁) = s₁ \ s₂ :=
by simp only [sdiff_inter_distrib_right, sdiff_self, union_empty]
@[simp] theorem sdiff_empty {s₁ : finset α} : s₁ \ ∅ = s₁ :=
ext (by simp)
@[mono]
theorem sdiff_subset_sdiff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : finset α} (h₁ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) :
t₁ \ s₁ ⊆ t₂ \ s₂ :=
by simpa only [subset_iff, mem_sdiff, and_imp] using λ a m₁ m₂, and.intro (h₁ m₁) (mt (@h₂ _) m₂)
theorem sdiff_subset_self {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁ \ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
suffices s₁ \ s₂ ⊆ s₁ \ ∅, by simpa [sdiff_empty] using this,
sdiff_subset_sdiff (subset.refl _) (empty_subset _)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sdiff (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : ↑(s₁ \ s₂) = (↑s₁ \ ↑s₂ : set α) :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_sdiff
@[simp] theorem union_sdiff_self_eq_union {s t : finset α} : s ∪ (t \ s) = s ∪ t :=
ext $ λ a, by simp only [mem_union, mem_sdiff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
imp_and_distrib, and_iff_left id]
@[simp] theorem sdiff_union_self_eq_union {s t : finset α} : (s \ t) ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
by rw [union_comm, union_sdiff_self_eq_union, union_comm]
lemma union_sdiff_symm {s t : finset α} : s ∪ (t \ s) = t ∪ (s \ t) :=
by rw [union_sdiff_self_eq_union, union_sdiff_self_eq_union, union_comm]
lemma sdiff_union_inter (s t : finset α) : (s \ t) ∪ (s ∩ t) = s :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_union, mem_sdiff, mem_inter], tauto }
@[simp] lemma sdiff_idem (s t : finset α) : s \ t \ t = s \ t :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_sdiff], tauto }
lemma sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset {s t : finset α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
by { rw [subset_iff, ext_iff], simp }
@[simp] lemma empty_sdiff (s : finset α) : ∅ \ s = ∅ :=
by { rw sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, exact empty_subset _ }
lemma insert_sdiff_of_not_mem (s : finset α) {t : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
(insert x s) \ t = insert x (s \ t) :=
begin
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert],
exact set.insert_diff_of_not_mem ↑s h
end
lemma insert_sdiff_of_mem (s : finset α) {t : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ t) :
(insert x s) \ t = s \ t :=
begin
rw [← coe_inj, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert],
exact set.insert_diff_of_mem ↑s h
end
@[simp] lemma sdiff_subset (s t : finset α) : s \ t ⊆ s :=
by simp [subset_iff, mem_sdiff] {contextual := tt}
lemma union_sdiff_distrib (s₁ s₂ t : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \ t = s₁ \ t ∪ s₂ \ t :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_sdiff, mem_union], tauto }
lemma sdiff_union_distrib (s t₁ t₂ : finset α) : s \ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = (s \ t₁) ∩ (s \ t₂) :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_union, mem_sdiff, mem_inter], tauto }
lemma union_sdiff_self (s t : finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
by rw [union_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_self, union_empty]
lemma sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : finset α) : s \ singleton a = erase s a :=
by { ext, rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton], tauto }
lemma sdiff_sdiff_self_left (s t : finset α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_sdiff, mem_inter], tauto }
lemma inter_eq_inter_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff {s t₁ t₂ : finset α} : s \ t₁ = s \ t₂ → s ∩ t₁ = s ∩ t₂ :=
by { simp only [ext_iff, mem_sdiff, mem_inter], intros b c, replace b := b c, split; tauto }
end decidable_eq
/-! ### attach -/
/-- `attach s` takes the elements of `s` and forms a new set of elements of the
subtype `{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : finset α) : finset {x // x ∈ s} := ⟨attach s.1, nodup_attach.2 s.2⟩
theorem sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem [has_sizeof α] {x : α} {s : finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
sizeof x < sizeof s := by
{ cases s, dsimp [sizeof, has_sizeof.sizeof, finset.sizeof],
apply lt_add_left, exact multiset.sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem hx }
@[simp] theorem attach_val (s : finset α) : s.attach.1 = s.1.attach := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (s : finset α) : ∀ x, x ∈ s.attach := mem_attach _
@[simp] theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : finset α) = ∅ := rfl
/-! ### piecewise -/
section piecewise
/-- `s.piecewise f g` is the function equal to `f` on the finset `s`, and to `g` on its
complement. -/
def piecewise {α : Type*} {δ : α → Sort*} (s : finset α) (f g : Πi, δ i) [∀j, decidable (j ∈ s)] :
Πi, δ i :=
λi, if i ∈ s then f i else g i
variables {δ : α → Sort*} (s : finset α) (f g : Πi, δ i)
@[simp] lemma piecewise_insert_self [decidable_eq α] {j : α} [∀i, decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g j = f j :=
by simp [piecewise]
@[simp] lemma piecewise_empty [∀i : α, decidable (i ∈ (∅ : finset α))] : piecewise ∅ f g = g :=
by { ext i, simp [piecewise] }
variable [∀j, decidable (j ∈ s)]
@[norm_cast] lemma piecewise_coe [∀j, decidable (j ∈ (↑s : set α))] :
(↑s : set α).piecewise f g = s.piecewise f g :=
by { ext, congr }
@[simp, priority 980]
lemma piecewise_eq_of_mem {i : α} (hi : i ∈ s) : s.piecewise f g i = f i :=
by simp [piecewise, hi]
@[simp, priority 980]
lemma piecewise_eq_of_not_mem {i : α} (hi : i ∉ s) : s.piecewise f g i = g i :=
by simp [piecewise, hi]
@[simp, priority 990]
lemma piecewise_insert_of_ne [decidable_eq α] {i j : α} [∀i, decidable (i ∈ insert j s)]
(h : i ≠ j) : (insert j s).piecewise f g i = s.piecewise f g i :=
by simp [piecewise, h]
lemma piecewise_insert [decidable_eq α] (j : α) [∀i, decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g = function.update (s.piecewise f g) j (f j) :=
begin
classical,
rw [← piecewise_coe, ← piecewise_coe, ← set.piecewise_insert, ← coe_insert j s],
congr
end
lemma update_eq_piecewise {β : Type*} [decidable_eq α] (f : α → β) (i : α) (v : β) :
function.update f i v = piecewise (singleton i) (λj, v) f :=
begin
ext j,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw [h], simp },
{ simp [h] }
end
end piecewise
section decidable_pi_exists
variables {s : finset α}
instance decidable_dforall_finset {p : Πa∈s, Prop} [hp : ∀a (h : a ∈ s), decidable (p a h)] :
decidable (∀a (h : a ∈ s), p a h) :=
multiset.decidable_dforall_multiset
/-- decidable equality for functions whose domain is bounded by finsets -/
instance decidable_eq_pi_finset {β : α → Type*} [h : ∀a, decidable_eq (β a)] :
decidable_eq (Πa∈s, β a) :=
multiset.decidable_eq_pi_multiset
instance decidable_dexists_finset {p : Πa∈s, Prop} [hp : ∀a (h : a ∈ s), decidable (p a h)] :
decidable (∃a (h : a ∈ s), p a h) :=
multiset.decidable_dexists_multiset
end decidable_pi_exists
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
/-- `filter p s` is the set of elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : finset α) : finset α :=
⟨_, nodup_filter p s.2⟩
@[simp] theorem filter_val (s : finset α) : (filter p s).1 = s.1.filter p := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {s : finset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s.filter p ↔ a ∈ s ∧ p a := mem_filter
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (s : finset α) : s.filter p ⊆ s := filter_subset _
theorem filter_ssubset {s : finset α} : s.filter p ⊂ s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ¬ p x :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨x, hs, hp⟩ := set.exists_of_ssubset h in ⟨x, hs, mt (λ hp, mem_filter.2 ⟨hs, hp⟩) hp⟩,
λ ⟨x, hs, hp⟩, ⟨s.filter_subset, λ h, hp (mem_filter.1 (h hs)).2⟩⟩
theorem filter_filter (s : finset α) :
(s.filter p).filter q = s.filter (λa, p a ∧ q a) :=
ext $ assume a, by simp only [mem_filter, and_comm, and.left_comm]
lemma filter_true {s : finset α} [h : decidable_pred (λ _, true)] :
@finset.filter α (λ _, true) h s = s :=
by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem filter_false {h} (s : finset α) : @filter α (λa, false) h s = ∅ :=
ext $ assume a, by simp only [mem_filter, and_false]; refl
/-- If all elements of a `finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, `s.filter p` is `s`. -/
@[simp] lemma filter_true_of_mem {s : finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : s.filter p = s :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ h, (mem_filter.1 h).1, λ hx, mem_filter.2 ⟨hx, h x hx⟩⟩
/-- If all elements of a `finset` fail to satisfy the predicate `p`, `s.filter p` is `∅`. -/
lemma filter_false_of_mem {s : finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x) : s.filter p = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (by simpa)
lemma filter_congr {s : finset α} (H : ∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x) : filter p s = filter q s :=
eq_of_veq $ filter_congr H
lemma filter_empty : filter p ∅ = ∅ :=
subset_empty.1 $ filter_subset _
lemma filter_subset_filter {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s.filter p ⊆ t.filter p :=
assume a ha, mem_filter.2 ⟨h (mem_filter.1 ha).1, (mem_filter.1 ha).2⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_filter (s : finset α) : ↑(s.filter p) = ({x ∈ ↑s | p x} : set α) :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_filter
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p (singleton a) = if p a then singleton a else ∅ :=
by { classical, ext x, simp, split_ifs with h; by_cases h' : x = a; simp [h, h'] }
variable [decidable_eq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_distrib_right]
theorem filter_union_right (p q : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q] (s : finset α) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter (λx, p x ∨ q x) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_distrib_left.symm]
lemma filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : finset α} : s.filter (λ i, i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext $ λ i, by rw [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter {s t : finset α} : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) :=
by { ext, simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and.right_comm] }
theorem inter_filter {s t : finset α} : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) :=
by rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else (filter p s) :=
by { ext x, simp, split_ifs with h; by_cases h' : x = a; simp [h, h'] }
theorem filter_or [decidable_pred (λ a, p a ∨ q a)] (s : finset α) :
s.filter (λ a, p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_distrib_left]
theorem filter_and [decidable_pred (λ a, p a ∧ q a)] (s : finset α) :
s.filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and.left_comm, and_self]
theorem filter_not [decidable_pred (λ a, ¬ p a)] (s : finset α) :
s.filter (λ a, ¬ p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext $ by simpa only [mem_filter, mem_sdiff, and_comm, not_and] using λ a, and_congr_right $
λ h : a ∈ s, (imp_iff_right h).symm.trans imp_not_comm
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : finset α) :
s₁ \ s₂ = filter (∉ s₂) s₁ := ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem sdiff_eq_self (s₁ s₂ : finset α) :
s₁ \ s₂ = s₁ ↔ s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ ∅ :=
by { simp [subset.antisymm_iff,sdiff_subset_self],
split; intro h,
{ transitivity' ((s₁ \ s₂) ∩ s₂), mono, simp },
{ calc s₁ \ s₂
⊇ s₁ \ (s₁ ∩ s₂) : by simp [(⊇)]
... ⊇ s₁ \ ∅ : by mono using [(⊇)]
... ⊇ s₁ : by simp [(⊇)] } }
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [decidable_pred (λ a, ¬ p a)]
(s : finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter (λa, ¬ p a) = s :=
by simp only [filter_not, union_sdiff_of_subset (filter_subset s)]
theorem filter_inter_filter_neg_eq (s : finset α) : s.filter p ∩ s.filter (λa, ¬ p a) = ∅ :=
by simp only [filter_not, inter_sdiff_self]
lemma subset_union_elim {s : finset α} {t₁ t₂ : set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃s₁ s₂ : finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ :=
begin
classical,
refine ⟨s.filter (∈ t₁), s.filter (∉ t₁), _, _ , _⟩,
{ simp [filter_union_right, em] },
{ intro x, simp },
{ intro x, simp, intros hx hx₂, refine ⟨or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩ }
end
/- We can simplify an application of filter where the decidability is inferred in "the wrong way" -/
@[simp] lemma filter_congr_decidable {α} (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) (h : decidable_pred p)
[decidable_pred p] : @filter α p h s = s.filter p :=
by congr
section classical
open_locale classical
/-- The following instance allows us to write `{ x ∈ s | p x }` for `finset.filter s p`.
Since the former notation requires us to define this for all propositions `p`, and `finset.filter`
only works for decidable propositions, the notation `{ x ∈ s | p x }` is only compatible with
classical logic because it uses `classical.prop_decidable`.
We don't want to redo all lemmas of `finset.filter` for `has_sep.sep`, so we make sure that `simp`
unfolds the notation `{ x ∈ s | p x }` to `finset.filter s p`. If `p` happens to be decidable, the
simp-lemma `filter_congr_decidable` will make sure that `finset.filter` uses the right instance
for decidability.
-/
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} : has_sep α (finset α) := ⟨λ p x, x.filter p⟩
@[simp] lemma sep_def {α : Type*} (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) : {x ∈ s | p x} = s.filter p := rfl
end classical
/--
After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter(eq b)`.
lemma filter_eq [decidable_eq β] (s : finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter(eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
begin
split_ifs,
{ ext,
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, h.2.symm, by { rintro ⟨h⟩, exact ⟨h, rfl⟩, }⟩ },
{ ext,
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty],
rintros m ⟨e⟩, exact h m, }
end
/--
After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
lemma filter_eq' [decidable_eq β] (s : finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (λ a, a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
trans (filter_congr (λ _ _, ⟨eq.symm, eq.symm⟩)) (filter_eq s b)
lemma filter_ne [decidable_eq β] (s : finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (λ a, b ≠ a) = s.erase b :=
by { ext, simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, ne.def], cc, }
lemma filter_ne' [decidable_eq β] (s : finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (λ a, a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
trans (filter_congr (λ _ _, ⟨ne.symm, ne.symm⟩)) (filter_ne s b)
end filter
/-! ### range -/
section range
variables {n m l : ℕ}
/-- `range n` is the set of natural numbers less than `n`. -/
def range (n : ℕ) : finset ℕ := ⟨_, nodup_range n⟩
@[simp] theorem range_coe (n : ℕ) : (range n).1 = multiset.range n := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_range : m ∈ range n ↔ m < n := mem_range
@[simp] theorem range_zero : range 0 = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem range_one : range 1 = {0} := rfl
theorem range_succ : range (succ n) = insert n (range n) :=
eq_of_veq $ (range_succ n).trans $ (ndinsert_of_not_mem not_mem_range_self).symm
theorem range_add_one : range (n + 1) = insert n (range n) :=
range_succ
@[simp] theorem not_mem_range_self : n ∉ range n := not_mem_range_self
@[simp] theorem self_mem_range_succ (n : ℕ) : n ∈ range (n + 1) := multiset.self_mem_range_succ n
@[simp] theorem range_subset {n m} : range n ⊆ range m ↔ n ≤ m := range_subset
theorem range_mono : monotone range := λ _ _, range_subset.2
end range
/- useful rules for calculations with quantifiers -/
theorem exists_mem_empty_iff (p : α → Prop) : (∃ x, x ∈ (∅ : finset α) ∧ p x) ↔ false :=
by simp only [not_mem_empty, false_and, exists_false]
theorem exists_mem_insert [d : decidable_eq α]
(a : α) (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∃ x, x ∈ insert a s ∧ p x) ↔ p a ∨ (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x) :=
by simp only [mem_insert, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem forall_mem_empty_iff (p : α → Prop) : (∀ x, x ∈ (∅ : finset α) → p x) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ _, false.elim
theorem forall_mem_insert [d : decidable_eq α]
(a : α) (s : finset α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → p x) ↔ p a ∧ (∀ x, x ∈ s → p x) :=
by simp only [mem_insert, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
end finset
/-- Equivalence between the set of natural numbers which are `≥ k` and `ℕ`, given by `n → n - k`. -/
def not_mem_range_equiv (k : ℕ) : {n // n ∉ range k} ≃ ℕ :=
{ to_fun := λ i, i.1 - k,
inv_fun := λ j, ⟨j + k, by simp⟩,
left_inv :=
begin
assume j,
rw subtype.ext_iff_val,
apply nat.sub_add_cancel,
simpa using j.2
end,
right_inv := λ j, nat.add_sub_cancel _ _ }
@[simp] lemma coe_not_mem_range_equiv (k : ℕ) :
(not_mem_range_equiv k : {n // n ∉ range k} → ℕ) = (λ i, i - k) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_not_mem_range_equiv_symm (k : ℕ) :
((not_mem_range_equiv k).symm : ℕ → {n // n ∉ range k}) = λ j, ⟨j + k, by simp⟩ := rfl
namespace option
/-- Construct an empty or singleton finset from an `option` -/
def to_finset (o : option α) : finset α :=
match o with
| none := ∅
| some a := {a}
end
@[simp] theorem to_finset_none : none.to_finset = (∅ : finset α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem to_finset_some {a : α} : (some a).to_finset = {a} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_to_finset {a : α} {o : option α} : a ∈ o.to_finset ↔ a ∈ o :=
by cases o; simp only [to_finset, finset.mem_singleton, option.mem_def, eq_comm]; refl
end option
/-! ### erase_dup on list and multiset -/
namespace multiset
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `to_finset s` removes duplicates from the multiset `s` to produce a finset. -/
def to_finset (s : multiset α) : finset α := ⟨_, nodup_erase_dup s⟩
@[simp] theorem to_finset_val (s : multiset α) : s.to_finset.1 = s.erase_dup := rfl
theorem to_finset_eq {s : multiset α} (n : nodup s) : finset.mk s n = s.to_finset :=
finset.val_inj.1 (erase_dup_eq_self.2 n).symm
@[simp] theorem mem_to_finset {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s.to_finset ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_erase_dup
@[simp] lemma to_finset_zero :
to_finset (0 : multiset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_finset_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
to_finset (a :: s) = insert a (to_finset s) :=
finset.eq_of_veq erase_dup_cons
@[simp] lemma to_finset_add (s t : multiset α) :
to_finset (s + t) = to_finset s ∪ to_finset t :=
finset.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma to_finset_nsmul (s : multiset α) :
∀(n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0), (n •ℕ s).to_finset = s.to_finset
| 0 h := by contradiction
| (n+1) h :=
begin
by_cases n = 0,
{ rw [h, zero_add, one_nsmul] },
{ rw [add_nsmul, to_finset_add, one_nsmul, to_finset_nsmul n h, finset.union_idempotent] }
end
@[simp] lemma to_finset_inter (s t : multiset α) :
to_finset (s ∩ t) = to_finset s ∩ to_finset t :=
finset.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma to_finset_union (s t : multiset α) :
(s ∪ t).to_finset = s.to_finset ∪ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
theorem to_finset_eq_empty {m : multiset α} : m.to_finset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
finset.val_inj.symm.trans multiset.erase_dup_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma to_finset_subset (m1 m2 : multiset α) :
m1.to_finset ⊆ m2.to_finset ↔ m1 ⊆ m2 :=
by simp only [finset.subset_iff, multiset.subset_iff, multiset.mem_to_finset]
end multiset
namespace list
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `to_finset l` removes duplicates from the list `l` to produce a finset. -/
def to_finset (l : list α) : finset α := multiset.to_finset l
@[simp] theorem to_finset_val (l : list α) : l.to_finset.1 = (l.erase_dup : multiset α) := rfl
theorem to_finset_eq {l : list α} (n : nodup l) : @finset.mk α l n = l.to_finset :=
multiset.to_finset_eq n
@[simp] theorem mem_to_finset {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.to_finset ↔ a ∈ l :=
mem_erase_dup
@[simp] theorem to_finset_nil : to_finset (@nil α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem to_finset_cons {a : α} {l : list α} : to_finset (a :: l) = insert a (to_finset l) :=
finset.eq_of_veq $ by by_cases h : a ∈ l; simp [finset.insert_val', multiset.erase_dup_cons, h]
theorem to_finset_surjective : function.surjective (to_finset : list α → finset α) :=
begin
refine λ s, ⟨quotient.out' s.val, finset.ext $ λ x, _⟩,
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := quot.exists_rep s.val,
rw [list.mem_to_finset, finset.mem_def, ←hl],
exact list.perm.mem_iff (quotient.mk_out l)
end
end list
namespace finset
/-! ### map -/
section map
open function
/-- When `f` is an embedding of `α` in `β` and `s` is a finset in `α`, then `s.map f` is the image
finset in `β`. The embedding condition guarantees that there are no duplicates in the image. -/
def map (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : finset β :=
⟨s.1.map f, nodup_map f.2 s.2⟩
@[simp] theorem map_val (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : (map f s).1 = s.1.map f := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_empty (f : α ↪ β) : (∅ : finset α).map f = ∅ := rfl
variables {f : α ↪ β} {s : finset α}
@[simp] theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
mem_map.trans $ by simp only [exists_prop]; refl
theorem mem_map' (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : finset α} : f a ∈ s.map f ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_map_of_injective f.2
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : finset α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ s.map f :=
(mem_map' _).2
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : (↑(s.map f) : set β) = f '' ↑s :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_map.trans set.mem_image_iff_bex.symm
theorem coe_map_subset_range (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : (↑(s.map f) : set β) ⊆ set.range f :=
calc ↑(s.map f) = f '' ↑s : coe_map f s
... ⊆ set.range f : set.image_subset_range f ↑s
theorem map_to_finset [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {s : multiset α} :
s.to_finset.map f = (s.map f).to_finset :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_map, multiset.mem_map, exists_prop, multiset.mem_to_finset]
@[simp] theorem map_refl : s.map (embedding.refl _) = s :=
ext $ λ _, by simpa only [mem_map, exists_prop] using exists_eq_right
theorem map_map {g : β ↪ γ} : (s.map f).map g = s.map (f.trans g) :=
eq_of_veq $ by simp only [map_val, multiset.map_map]; refl
theorem map_subset_map {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁.map f ⊆ s₂.map f ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨λ h x xs, (mem_map' _).1 $ h $ (mem_map' f).2 xs,
λ h, by simp [subset_def, map_subset_map h]⟩
theorem map_inj {s₁ s₂ : finset α} : s₁.map f = s₂.map f ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
by simp only [subset.antisymm_iff, map_subset_map]
/-- Associate to an embedding `f` from `α` to `β` the embedding that maps a finset to its image
under `f`. -/
def map_embedding (f : α ↪ β) : finset α ↪ finset β := ⟨map f, λ s₁ s₂, map_inj.1⟩
@[simp] theorem map_embedding_apply : map_embedding f s = map f s := rfl
theorem map_filter {p : β → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
(s.map f).filter p = (s.filter (p ∘ f)).map f :=
ext $ λ b, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_map, exists_prop, and_assoc]; exact
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩; exact ⟨x, h1, h2, rfl⟩,
by rintro ⟨x, h1, h2, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩⟩
theorem map_union [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
{f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∪ s₂.map f :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_map, mem_union, exists_prop, or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib]
theorem map_inter [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
{f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∩ s₂.map f :=
ext $ λ b, by simp only [mem_map, mem_inter, exists_prop]; exact
⟨by rintro ⟨a, ⟨m₁, m₂⟩, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨a, m₁, rfl⟩, ⟨a, m₂, rfl⟩⟩,
by rintro ⟨⟨a, m₁, e⟩, ⟨a', m₂, rfl⟩⟩; cases f.2 e; exact ⟨_, ⟨m₁, m₂⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem map_singleton (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) : map f {a} = {f a} :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_map, mem_singleton, exists_prop, exists_eq_left]; exact eq_comm
@[simp] theorem map_insert [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β]
(f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : finset α) :
(insert a s).map f = insert (f a) (s.map f) :=
by simp only [insert_eq, map_union, map_singleton]
@[simp] theorem map_eq_empty : s.map f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨λ h, eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $
λ a m, ne_empty_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem _ m) h, λ e, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma attach_map_val {s : finset α} : s.attach.map (embedding.subtype _) = s :=
eq_of_veq $ by rw [map_val, attach_val]; exact attach_map_val _
end map
lemma range_add_one' (n : ℕ) :
range (n + 1) = insert 0 ((range n).map ⟨λi, i + 1, assume i j, nat.succ.inj⟩) :=
by ext (⟨⟩ | ⟨n⟩); simp [nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.zero_lt_succ n]
/-! ### image -/
section image
variables [decidable_eq β]
/-- `image f s` is the forward image of `s` under `f`. -/
def image (f : α → β) (s : finset α) : finset β := (s.1.map f).to_finset
@[simp] theorem image_val (f : α → β) (s : finset α) : (image f s).1 = (s.1.map f).erase_dup := rfl
@[simp] theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : (∅ : finset α).image f = ∅ := rfl
variables {f : α → β} {s : finset α}
@[simp] theorem mem_image {b : β} : b ∈ s.image f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
by simp only [mem_def, image_val, mem_erase_dup, multiset.mem_map, exists_prop]
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {a} {s : finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ s.image f :=
mem_image.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_image {f : α → β} : ↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s :=
set.ext $ λ _, mem_image.trans set.mem_image_iff_bex.symm
lemma nonempty.image (h : s.nonempty) (f : α → β) : (s.image f).nonempty :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨f a, mem_image_of_mem f ha⟩
theorem image_to_finset [decidable_eq α] {s : multiset α} :
s.to_finset.image f = (s.map f).to_finset :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_image, multiset.mem_to_finset, exists_prop, multiset.mem_map]
theorem image_val_of_inj_on (H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) : (image f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
multiset.erase_dup_eq_self.2 (nodup_map_on H s.2)
theorem image_id [decidable_eq α] : s.image id = s :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, id, exists_eq_right]
theorem image_image [decidable_eq γ] {g : β → γ} : (s.image f).image g = s.image (g ∘ f) :=
eq_of_veq $ by simp only [image_val, erase_dup_map_erase_dup_eq, multiset.map_map]
theorem image_subset_image {s₁ s₂ : finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.image f ⊆ s₂.image f :=
by simp only [subset_def, image_val, subset_erase_dup', erase_dup_subset',
multiset.map_subset_map h]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : finset α} {t : finset β} {f : α → β} :
s.image f ⊆ t ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t :=
calc s.image f ⊆ t ↔ f '' ↑s ⊆ ↑t : by norm_cast
... ↔ _ : set.image_subset_iff
theorem image_mono (f : α → β) : monotone (finset.image f) := λ _ _, image_subset_image
theorem coe_image_subset_range : ↑(s.image f) ⊆ set.range f :=
calc ↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s : coe_image
... ⊆ set.range f : set.image_subset_range f ↑s
theorem image_filter {p : β → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
(s.image f).filter p = (s.filter (p ∘ f)).image f :=
ext $ λ b, by simp only [mem_filter, mem_image, exists_prop]; exact
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩; exact ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩,
by rintro ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩⟩
theorem image_union [decidable_eq α] {f : α → β} (s₁ s₂ : finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∪ s₂.image f :=
ext $ λ _, by simp only [mem_image, mem_union, exists_prop, or_and_distrib_right,
exists_or_distrib]
theorem image_inter [decidable_eq α] (s₁ s₂ : finset α) (hf : ∀x y, f x = f y → x = y) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∩ s₂.image f :=
ext $ by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_inter]; exact λ b,
⟨λ ⟨a, ⟨m₁, m₂⟩, e⟩, ⟨⟨a, m₁, e⟩, ⟨a, m₂, e⟩⟩,
λ ⟨⟨a, m₁, e₁⟩, ⟨a', m₂, e₂⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨m₁, hf _ _ (e₂.trans e₁.symm) ▸ m₂⟩, e₁⟩⟩.
@[simp] theorem image_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : image f {a} = {f a} :=
ext $ λ x, by simpa only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left] using eq_comm
@[simp] theorem image_insert [decidable_eq α] (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : finset α) :
(insert a s).image f = insert (f a) (s.image f) :=
by simp only [insert_eq, image_singleton, image_union]
@[simp] theorem image_eq_empty : s.image f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨λ h, eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $
λ a m, ne_empty_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem _ m) h, λ e, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma attach_image_val [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} : s.attach.image subtype.val = s :=
eq_of_veq $ by rw [image_val, attach_val, multiset.attach_map_val, erase_dup_eq_self]
@[simp] lemma attach_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
attach (insert a s) = insert (⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩ : {x // x ∈ insert a s})
((attach s).image (λx, ⟨x.1, mem_insert_of_mem x.2⟩)) :=
ext $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨or.cases_on (mem_insert.1 hx)
(λ h : x = a, λ _, mem_insert.2 $ or.inl $ subtype.eq h)
(λ h : x ∈ s, λ _, mem_insert_of_mem $ mem_image.2 $ ⟨⟨x, h⟩, mem_attach _ _, subtype.eq rfl⟩),
λ _, finset.mem_attach _ _⟩
theorem map_eq_image (f : α ↪ β) (s : finset α) : s.map f = s.image f :=
eq_of_veq $ (multiset.erase_dup_eq_self.2 (s.map f).2).symm
lemma image_const {s : finset α} (h : s.nonempty) (b : β) : s.image (λa, b) = singleton b :=
ext $ assume b', by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_right,
h.bex, true_and, mem_singleton, eq_comm]
/--
Because `finset.image` requires a `decidable_eq` instances for the target type,
we can only construct a `functor finset` when working classically.
-/
instance [Π P, decidable P] : functor finset :=
{ map := λ α β f s, s.image f, }
instance [Π P, decidable P] : is_lawful_functor finset :=
{ id_map := λ α x, image_id,
comp_map := λ α β γ f g s, image_image.symm, }
/-- Given a finset `s` and a predicate `p`, `s.subtype p` is the finset of `subtype p` whose
elements belong to `s`. -/
protected def subtype {α} (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : finset α) : finset (subtype p) :=
(s.filter p).attach.map ⟨λ x, ⟨x.1, (finset.mem_filter.1 x.2).2⟩,
λ x y H, subtype.eq $ subtype.mk.inj H⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_subtype {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {s : finset α} :
∀{a : subtype p}, a ∈ s.subtype p ↔ a.val ∈ s
| ⟨a, ha⟩ := by simp [finset.subtype, ha]
/-- `s.subtype p` converts back to `s.filter p` with
`embedding.subtype`. -/
@[simp] lemma subtype_map (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
(s.subtype p).map (function.embedding.subtype _) = s.filter p :=
begin
ext x,
rw mem_map,
change (∃ a : {x // p x}, ∃ H, a.val = x) ↔ _,
split,
{ rintros ⟨y, hy, hyval⟩,
rw [mem_subtype, hyval] at hy,
rw mem_filter,
use hy,
rw ← hyval,
use y.property },
{ intro hx,
rw mem_filter at hx,
use ⟨⟨x, hx.2⟩, mem_subtype.2 hx.1, rfl⟩ }
end
/-- If all elements of a `finset` satisfy the predicate `p`,
`s.subtype p` converts back to `s` with `embedding.subtype`. -/
lemma subtype_map_of_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
(s.subtype p).map (function.embedding.subtype _) = s :=
by rw [subtype_map, filter_true_of_mem h]
/-- If a `finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`embedding.subtype`, all elements of the result have the property of
the subtype. -/
lemma property_of_mem_map_subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : finset {x // p x}) {a : α}
(h : a ∈ s.map (function.embedding.subtype _)) : p a :=
begin
rcases mem_map.1 h with ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact x.2
end
/-- If a `finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`embedding.subtype`, the result does not contain any value that does
not satisfy the property of the subtype. -/
lemma not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property {p : α → Prop} (s : finset {x // p x})
{a : α} (h : ¬ p a) : a ∉ (s.map (function.embedding.subtype _)) :=
mt s.property_of_mem_map_subtype h
/-- If a `finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`embedding.subtype`, the result is a subset of the set giving the
subtype. -/
lemma map_subtype_subset {t : set α} (s : finset t) :
↑(s.map (function.embedding.subtype _)) ⊆ t :=
begin
intros a ha,
rw mem_coe at ha,
convert property_of_mem_map_subtype s ha
end
lemma subset_image_iff {f : α → β}
{s : finset β} {t : set α} : ↑s ⊆ f '' t ↔ ∃s' : finset α, ↑s' ⊆ t ∧ s'.image f = s :=
begin
classical,
split, swap,
{ rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, rw [coe_image], exact set.image_subset f hs },
intro h, induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ refine ⟨∅, set.empty_subset _, _⟩,
convert finset.image_empty _ },
rw [finset.coe_insert, set.insert_subset] at h,
rcases ih h.2 with ⟨s', hst, hsi⟩,
rcases h.1 with ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨insert x s', _, _⟩,
{ rw [finset.coe_insert, set.insert_subset], exact ⟨hxt, hst⟩ },
rw [finset.image_insert, hsi],
congr
end
end image
end finset
theorem multiset.to_finset_map [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (m : multiset α) :
(m.map f).to_finset = m.to_finset.image f :=
finset.val_inj.1 (multiset.erase_dup_map_erase_dup_eq _ _).symm
namespace finset
/-! ### card -/
section card
/-- `card s` is the cardinality (number of elements) of `s`. -/
def card (s : finset α) : nat := s.1.card
theorem card_def (s : finset α) : s.card = s.1.card := rfl
@[simp] lemma card_mk {m nodup} : (⟨m, nodup⟩ : finset α).card = m.card := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_empty : card (∅ : finset α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero {s : finset α} : card s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
theorem card_pos {s : finset α} : 0 < card s ↔ s.nonempty :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans $ (not_congr card_eq_zero).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem {s : finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : card s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 (ne_empty_of_mem h)
theorem card_eq_one {s : finset α} : s.card = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} :=
by cases s; simp only [multiset.card_eq_one, finset.card, ← val_inj, singleton_val]
@[simp] theorem card_insert_of_not_mem [decidable_eq α]
{a : α} {s : finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : card (insert a s) = card s + 1 :=
by simpa only [card_cons, card, insert_val] using
congr_arg multiset.card (ndinsert_of_not_mem h)
theorem card_insert_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α}
(h : a ∈ s) : card (insert a s) = card s := by rw insert_eq_of_mem h
theorem card_insert_le [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : finset α) : card (insert a s) ≤ card s + 1 :=
by by_cases a ∈ s; [{rw [insert_eq_of_mem h], apply nat.le_add_right},
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]]
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : finset α) = 1 := card_singleton _
lemma card_singleton_inter [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {s : finset α} : ({x} ∩ s).card ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases (finset.decidable_mem x s),
{ simp [finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h] },
{ simp [finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h] },
end
theorem card_erase_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
a ∈ s → card (erase s a) = pred (card s) := card_erase_of_mem
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
a ∈ s → card (erase s a) < card s := card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : finset α} :
card (erase s a) ≤ card s := card_erase_le
@[simp] theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : card (range n) = n := card_range n
@[simp] theorem card_attach {s : finset α} : card (attach s) = card s := multiset.card_attach
end card
end finset
theorem multiset.to_finset_card_le [decidable_eq α] (m : multiset α) : m.to_finset.card ≤ m.card :=
card_le_of_le (erase_dup_le _)
theorem list.to_finset_card_le [decidable_eq α] (l : list α) : l.to_finset.card ≤ l.length :=
multiset.to_finset_card_le ⟦l⟧
namespace finset
section card
theorem card_image_le [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {s : finset α} : card (image f s) ≤ card s :=
by simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).to_finset_card_le
theorem card_image_of_inj_on [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {s : finset α}
(H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) : card (image f s) = card s :=
by simp only [card, image_val_of_inj_on H, card_map]
theorem card_image_of_injective [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (s : finset α)
(H : function.injective f) : card (image f s) = card s :=
card_image_of_inj_on $ λ x _ y _ h, H h
@[simp] lemma card_map {α β} (f : α ↪ β) {s : finset α} : (s.map f).card = s.card :=
multiset.card_map _ _
lemma card_eq_of_bijective {s : finset α} {n : ℕ}
(f : ∀i, i < n → α)
(hf : ∀a∈s, ∃i, ∃h:i<n, f i h = a) (hf' : ∀i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) :
card s = n :=
begin
classical,
have : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ ∃i (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a,
from assume a, ⟨assume ha, let ⟨i, hi, eq⟩ := hf a ha in ⟨i, mem_range.2 hi, eq⟩,
assume ⟨i, hi, eq⟩, eq ▸ hf' i (mem_range.1 hi)⟩,
have : s = ((range n).attach.image $ λi, f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)),
by simpa only [ext_iff, mem_image, exists_prop, subtype.exists, mem_attach, true_and],
calc card s = card ((range n).attach.image $ λi, f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)) :
by rw [this]
... = card ((range n).attach) :
card_image_of_injective _ $ assume ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq,
subtype.eq $ f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
... = card (range n) : card_attach
... = n : card_range n
end
lemma card_eq_succ [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {n : ℕ} :
s.card = n + 1 ↔ (∃a t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ card t = n) :=
iff.intro
(assume eq,
have 0 < card s, from eq.symm ▸ nat.zero_lt_succ _,
let ⟨a, has⟩ := card_pos.mp this in
⟨a, s.erase a, s.not_mem_erase a, insert_erase has,
by simp only [eq, card_erase_of_mem has, pred_succ]⟩)
(assume ⟨a, t, hat, s_eq, n_eq⟩, s_eq ▸ n_eq ▸ card_insert_of_not_mem hat)
theorem card_le_of_subset {s t : finset α} : s ⊆ t → card s ≤ card t :=
multiset.card_le_of_le ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : card t ≤ card s) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq $ multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
lemma card_lt_card {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊂ t) : s.card < t.card :=
card_lt_of_lt (val_lt_iff.2 h)
lemma card_le_card_of_inj_on {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀a∈s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : ∀a₁∈s, ∀a₂∈s, f a₁ = f a₂ → a₁ = a₂) :
card s ≤ card t :=
begin
classical,
calc card s = card (s.image f) : by rw [card_image_of_inj_on f_inj]
... ≤ card t : card_le_of_subset $
assume x hx, match x, finset.mem_image.1 hx with _, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf a ha end
end
lemma card_le_of_inj_on {n} {s : finset α}
(f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀i<n, f i ∈ s) (f_inj : ∀i j, i<n → j<n → f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ card s :=
calc n = card (range n) : (card_range n).symm
... ≤ card s : card_le_card_of_inj_on f
(by simpa only [mem_range])
(by simp only [mem_range]; exact assume a₁ h₁ a₂ h₂, f_inj a₁ a₂ h₁ h₂)
/-- Suppose that, given objects defined on all strict subsets of any finset `s`, one knows how to
define an object on `s`. Then one can inductively define an object on all finsets, starting from
the empty set and iterating. This can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def strong_induction_on {p : finset α → Sort*} :
∀ (s : finset α), (∀s, (∀t ⊂ s, p t) → p s) → p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ ih := multiset.strong_induction_on s
(λ s IH nd, ih ⟨s, nd⟩ (λ ⟨t, nd'⟩ ss, IH t (val_lt_iff.2 ss) nd')) nd
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma case_strong_induction_on [decidable_eq α] {p : finset α → Prop}
(s : finset α) (h₀ : p ∅) (h₁ : ∀ a s, a ∉ s → (∀t ⊆ s, p t) → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
finset.strong_induction_on s $ λ s,
finset.induction_on s (λ _, h₀) $ λ a s n _ ih, h₁ a s n $
λ t ss, ih _ (lt_of_le_of_lt ss (ssubset_insert n) : t < _)
lemma card_congr {s : finset α} {t : finset β} (f : Π a ∈ s, β)
(h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t) (h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b)
(h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) : s.card = t.card :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
calc s.card = s.attach.card : card_attach.symm
... = (s.attach.image (λ (a : {a // a ∈ s}), f a.1 a.2)).card :
eq.symm (card_image_of_injective _ (λ a b h, subtype.eq (h₂ _ _ _ _ h)))
... = t.card : congr_arg card (finset.ext $ λ b,
⟨λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_image.1 h in ha₂ ▸ h₁ _ _,
λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := h₃ b h in mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, by simp [ha₂]⟩⟩)
lemma card_union_add_card_inter [decidable_eq α] (s t : finset α) :
(s ∪ t).card + (s ∩ t).card = s.card + t.card :=
finset.induction_on t (by simp) $ λ a r har, by by_cases a ∈ s; simp *; cc
lemma card_union_le [decidable_eq α] (s t : finset α) :
(s ∪ t).card ≤ s.card + t.card :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ le_add_right _ _
lemma card_union_eq [decidable_eq α] {s t : finset α} (h : disjoint s t) :
(s ∪ t).card = s.card + t.card :=
begin
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter],
convert (add_zero _).symm, rw [card_eq_zero], rwa [disjoint_iff] at h
end
lemma surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
(f : Π a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(hst : card t ≤ card s) :
(∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq β; exact
λ b hb,
have h : card (image (λ (a : {a // a ∈ s}), f a a.prop) (attach s)) = card s,
from @card_attach _ s ▸ card_image_of_injective _
(λ ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ h, subtype.eq $ hinj _ _ _ _ h),
have h₁ : image (λ a : {a // a ∈ s}, f a a.prop) s.attach = t :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (λ b h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_image.1 h in
ha₂ ▸ hf _ _) (by simp [hst, h]),
begin
rw ← h₁ at hb,
rcases mem_image.1 hb with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, a.2, ha₂.symm⟩,
end
open function
lemma inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
(f : Π a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha)
(hst : card s ≤ card t)
⦃a₁ a₂⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) (ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s)
(ha₁a₂: f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) : a₁ = a₂ :=
by haveI : inhabited {x // x ∈ s} := ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁⟩⟩; exact
let f' : {x // x ∈ s} → {x // x ∈ t} := λ x, ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf x.1 x.2⟩ in
let g : {x // x ∈ t} → {x // x ∈ s} :=
@surj_inv _ _ f'
(λ x, let ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ := hsurj x.1 x.2 in ⟨⟨y, hy₁⟩, subtype.eq hy₂.symm⟩) in
have hg : injective g, from function.injective_surj_inv _,
have hsg : surjective g, from λ x,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (λ (x : {x // x ∈ t}) (hx : x ∈ t.attach), g x)
(λ x _, show (g x) ∈ s.attach, from mem_attach _ _)
(λ x y _ _ hxy, hg hxy) (by simpa) x (mem_attach _ _) in
⟨y, hy.snd.symm⟩,
have hif : injective f',
from (left_inverse_of_surjective_of_right_inverse hsg
(right_inverse_surj_inv _)).injective,
subtype.ext_iff_val.1 (@hif ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (subtype.eq ha₁a₂))
end card
/-! ### bind -/
section bind
variables [decidable_eq β] {s : finset α} {t : α → finset β}
/-- `bind s t` is the union of `t x` over `x ∈ s` -/
protected def bind (s : finset α) (t : α → finset β) : finset β :=
(s.1.bind (λ a, (t a).1)).to_finset
@[simp] theorem bind_val (s : finset α) (t : α → finset β) :
(s.bind t).1 = (s.1.bind (λ a, (t a).1)).erase_dup := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_empty : finset.bind ∅ t = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_bind {b : β} : b ∈ s.bind t ↔ ∃a∈s, b ∈ t a :=
by simp only [mem_def, bind_val, mem_erase_dup, mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp] theorem bind_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} : (insert a s).bind t = t a ∪ s.bind t :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_bind, exists_prop, mem_union, mem_insert,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
-- ext $ λ x, by simp [or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib]
@[simp] lemma singleton_bind {a : α} : finset.bind {a} t = t a :=
begin
classical,
rw [← insert_emptyc_eq, bind_insert, bind_empty, union_empty]
end
theorem bind_inter (s : finset α) (f : α → finset β) (t : finset β) :
s.bind f ∩ t = s.bind (λ x, f x ∩ t) :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_bind, mem_inter],
tauto
end
theorem inter_bind (t : finset β) (s : finset α) (f : α → finset β) :
t ∩ s.bind f = s.bind (λ x, t ∩ f x) :=
by rw [inter_comm, bind_inter]; simp [inter_comm]
theorem image_bind [decidable_eq γ] {f : α → β} {s : finset α} {t : β → finset γ} :
(s.image f).bind t = s.bind (λa, t (f a)) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s rfl (λ a s has ih,
by simp only [image_insert, bind_insert, ih])
theorem bind_image [decidable_eq γ] {s : finset α} {t : α → finset β} {f : β → γ} :
(s.bind t).image f = s.bind (λa, (t a).image f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s rfl (λ a s has ih,
by simp only [bind_insert, image_union, ih])
theorem bind_to_finset [decidable_eq α] (s : multiset α) (t : α → multiset β) :
(s.bind t).to_finset = s.to_finset.bind (λa, (t a).to_finset) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [multiset.mem_to_finset, mem_bind, multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
lemma bind_mono {t₁ t₂ : α → finset β} (h : ∀a∈s, t₁ a ⊆ t₂ a) : s.bind t₁ ⊆ s.bind t₂ :=
have ∀b a, a ∈ s → b ∈ t₁ a → (∃ (a : α), a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t₂ a),
from assume b a ha hb, ⟨a, ha, finset.mem_of_subset (h a ha) hb⟩,
by simpa only [subset_iff, mem_bind, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp, exists_prop]
lemma bind_subset_bind_of_subset_left {α : Type*} {s₁ s₂ : finset α}
(t : α → finset β) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.bind t ⊆ s₂.bind t :=
begin
intro x,
simp only [and_imp, mem_bind, exists_prop],
exact Exists.imp (λ a ha, ⟨h ha.1, ha.2⟩)
end
lemma bind_singleton {f : α → β} : s.bind (λa, {f a}) = s.image f :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_bind, mem_image, mem_singleton, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma bind_singleton_eq_self [decidable_eq α] :
s.bind (singleton : α → finset α) = s :=
by { rw bind_singleton, exact image_id }
lemma image_bind_filter_eq [decidable_eq α] (s : finset β) (g : β → α) :
(s.image g).bind (λa, s.filter $ (λc, g c = a)) = s :=
begin
ext b,
suffices : (∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ g b = g a) ↔ b ∈ s, by simpa,
exact ⟨λ ⟨a, ha, hb, hab⟩, hb, λ hb, ⟨b, hb, hb, rfl⟩⟩
end
end bind
/-! ### prod-/
section prod
variables {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
/-- `product s t` is the set of pairs `(a, b)` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def product (s : finset α) (t : finset β) : finset (α × β) := ⟨_, nodup_product s.2 t.2⟩
@[simp] theorem product_val : (s.product t).1 = s.1.product t.1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {p : α × β} : p ∈ s.product t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t := mem_product
theorem subset_product [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] {s : finset (α × β)} :
s ⊆ (s.image prod.fst).product (s.image prod.snd) :=
λ p hp, mem_product.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
theorem product_eq_bind [decidable_eq α] [decidable_eq β] (s : finset α) (t : finset β) :
s.product t = s.bind (λa, t.image $ λb, (a, b)) :=
ext $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simp only [mem_product, mem_bind, mem_image, exists_prop, prod.mk.inj_iff,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_right, exists_eq_left]
@[simp] theorem card_product (s : finset α) (t : finset β) : card (s.product t) = card s * card t :=
multiset.card_product _ _
end prod
/-! ### sigma -/
section sigma
variables {σ : α → Type*} {s : finset α} {t : Πa, finset (σ a)}
/-- `sigma s t` is the set of dependent pairs `⟨a, b⟩` such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t a`. -/
protected def sigma (s : finset α) (t : Πa, finset (σ a)) : finset (Σa, σ a) :=
⟨_, nodup_sigma s.2 (λ a, (t a).2)⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {p : sigma σ} : p ∈ s.sigma t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t (p.1) := mem_sigma
theorem sigma_mono {s₁ s₂ : finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Πa, finset (σ a)}
(H1 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H2 : ∀a, t₁ a ⊆ t₂ a) : s₁.sigma t₁ ⊆ s₂.sigma t₂ :=
λ ⟨x, sx⟩ H, let ⟨H3, H4⟩ := mem_sigma.1 H in mem_sigma.2 ⟨H1 H3, H2 x H4⟩
theorem sigma_eq_bind [decidable_eq (Σ a, σ a)] (s : finset α)
(t : Πa, finset (σ a)) :
s.sigma t = s.bind (λa, (t a).map $ function.embedding.sigma_mk a) :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and.left_comm] }
end sigma
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
variable [decidable_eq α]
theorem disjoint_left {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
by simp only [_root_.disjoint, inf_eq_inter, le_iff_subset, subset_iff, mem_inter, not_and,
and_imp]; refl
theorem disjoint_val {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ s.1.disjoint t.1 :=
disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
instance decidable_disjoint (U V : finset α) : decidable (disjoint U V) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by apply_instance) eq_bot_iff
theorem disjoint_right {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ t → a ∉ s :=
by rw [disjoint.comm, disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {s t : finset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {s t u : finset α} (h : s ⊆ u) (d : disjoint u t) : disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.2 (λ x m₁, (disjoint_left.1 d) (h m₁))
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {s t u : finset α} (h : t ⊆ u) (d : disjoint s u) : disjoint s t :=
disjoint_right.2 (λ x m₁, (disjoint_right.1 d) (h m₁))
@[simp] theorem disjoint_empty_left (s : finset α) : disjoint ∅ s := disjoint_bot_left
@[simp] theorem disjoint_empty_right (s : finset α) : disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right
@[simp] theorem singleton_disjoint {s : finset α} {a : α} : disjoint (singleton a) s ↔ a ∉ s :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, mem_singleton, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_singleton {s : finset α} {a : α} : disjoint s (singleton a) ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint.comm.trans singleton_disjoint
@[simp] theorem disjoint_insert_left {a : α} {s t : finset α} :
disjoint (insert a s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ disjoint s t :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, mem_insert, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_insert_right {a : α} {s t : finset α} :
disjoint s (insert a t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ disjoint s t :=
disjoint.comm.trans $ by rw [disjoint_insert_left, disjoint.comm]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_left {s t u : finset α} :
disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ disjoint s u ∧ disjoint t u :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_right {s t u : finset α} :
disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ disjoint s t ∧ disjoint s u :=
by simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
lemma sdiff_disjoint {s t : finset α} : disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 $ assume a ha, (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
lemma disjoint_sdiff {s t : finset α} : disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
lemma disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : finset α) : disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (inter_subset_right _ _) sdiff_disjoint
lemma sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint {s t : finset α} : s \ t = s ↔ disjoint s t :=
by rw [sdiff_eq_self, subset_empty, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
lemma sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint {s t : finset α} (h : disjoint s t) : s \ t = s :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint.2 h
lemma disjoint_self_iff_empty (s : finset α) : disjoint s s ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_self
lemma disjoint_bind_left {ι : Type*}
(s : finset ι) (f : ι → finset α) (t : finset α) :
disjoint (s.bind f) t ↔ (∀i∈s, disjoint (f i) t) :=
begin
classical,
refine s.induction _ _,
{ simp only [forall_mem_empty_iff, bind_empty, disjoint_empty_left] },
{ assume i s his ih,
simp only [disjoint_union_left, bind_insert, his, forall_mem_insert, ih] }
end
lemma disjoint_bind_right {ι : Type*}
(s : finset α) (t : finset ι) (f : ι → finset α) :
disjoint s (t.bind f) ↔ (∀i∈t, disjoint s (f i)) :=
by simpa only [disjoint.comm] using disjoint_bind_left t f s
@[simp] theorem card_disjoint_union {s t : finset α} (h : disjoint s t) :
card (s ∪ t) = card s + card t :=
by rw [← card_union_add_card_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 h, card_empty, add_zero]
theorem card_sdiff {s t : finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : card (t \ s) = card t - card s :=
suffices card (t \ s) = card ((t \ s) ∪ s) - card s, by rwa sdiff_union_of_subset h at this,
by rw [card_disjoint_union sdiff_disjoint, nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma disjoint_filter {s : finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q] :
disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬ q x) :=
by split; simp [disjoint_left] {contextual := tt}
lemma disjoint_filter_filter {s t : finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
[decidable_pred q] :
(disjoint s t) → disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) :=
disjoint.mono (filter_subset _) (filter_subset _)
lemma disjoint_iff_disjoint_coe {α : Type*} {a b : finset α} [decidable_eq α] :
disjoint a b ↔ disjoint (↑a : set α) (↑b : set α) :=
by { rw [finset.disjoint_left, set.disjoint_left], refl }
end disjoint
/--
Given a set A and a set B inside it, we can shrink A to any appropriate size, and keep B
inside it.
-/
lemma exists_intermediate_set {A B : finset α} (i : ℕ)
(h₁ : i + card B ≤ card A) (h₂ : B ⊆ A) :
∃ (C : finset α), B ⊆ C ∧ C ⊆ A ∧ card C = i + card B :=
begin
classical,
rcases nat.le.dest h₁ with ⟨k, _⟩,
clear h₁,
induction k with k ih generalizing A,
{ exact ⟨A, h₂, subset.refl _, h.symm⟩ },
{ have : (A \ B).nonempty,
{ rw [← card_pos, card_sdiff h₂, ← h, nat.add_right_comm,
nat.add_sub_cancel, nat.add_succ],
apply nat.succ_pos },
rcases this with ⟨a, ha⟩,
have z : i + card B + k = card (erase A a),
{ rw [card_erase_of_mem, ← h, nat.add_succ, nat.pred_succ],
rw mem_sdiff at ha,
exact ha.1 },
rcases ih _ z with ⟨B', hB', B'subA', cards⟩,
{ exact ⟨B', hB', trans B'subA' (erase_subset _ _), cards⟩ },
{ rintros t th,
apply mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem _ (h₂ th),
rintro rfl,
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right th ha } }
end
/-- We can shrink A to any smaller size. -/
lemma exists_smaller_set (A : finset α) (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i ≤ card A) :
∃ (B : finset α), B ⊆ A ∧ card B = i :=
let ⟨B, _, x₁, x₂⟩ := exists_intermediate_set i (by simpa) (empty_subset A) in ⟨B, x₁, x₂⟩
/-- `finset.fin_range k` is the finset `{0, 1, ..., k-1}`, as a `finset (fin k)`. -/
def fin_range (k : ℕ) : finset (fin k) :=
⟨list.fin_range k, list.nodup_fin_range k⟩
@[simp]
lemma fin_range_card {k : ℕ} : (fin_range k).card = k :=
by simp [fin_range]
@[simp]
lemma mem_fin_range {k : ℕ} (m : fin k) : m ∈ fin_range k :=
list.mem_fin_range m
/-- Given a finset `s` of `ℕ` contained in `{0,..., n-1}`, the corresponding finset in `fin n`
is `s.attach_fin h` where `h` is a proof that all elements of `s` are less than `n`. -/
def attach_fin (s : finset ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ m ∈ s, m < n) : finset (fin n) :=
⟨s.1.pmap (λ a ha, ⟨a, ha⟩) h, multiset.nodup_pmap (λ _ _ _ _, fin.veq_of_eq) s.2⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_attach_fin {n : ℕ} {s : finset ℕ} (h : ∀ m ∈ s, m < n) {a : fin n} :
a ∈ s.attach_fin h ↔ (a : ℕ) ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := multiset.mem_pmap.1 h in hb₂ ▸ hb₁,
λ h, multiset.mem_pmap.2 ⟨a, h, fin.eta _ _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma card_attach_fin {n : ℕ} (s : finset ℕ) (h : ∀ m ∈ s, m < n) :
(s.attach_fin h).card = s.card := multiset.card_pmap _ _ _
/-! ### choose -/
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def choose_x (hp : (∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a)) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
multiset.choose_x p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α := choose_x p l hp
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
theorem lt_wf {α} : well_founded (@has_lt.lt (finset α) _) :=
have H : subrelation (@has_lt.lt (finset α) _)
(inv_image (<) card),
from λ x y hxy, card_lt_card hxy,
subrelation.wf H $ inv_image.wf _ $ nat.lt_wf
end finset
namespace list
variable [decidable_eq α]
theorem to_finset_card_of_nodup {l : list α} (h : l.nodup) : l.to_finset.card = l.length :=
congr_arg card $ (@multiset.erase_dup_eq_self α _ l).2 h
end list
namespace multiset
lemma disjoint_to_finset [decidable_eq α] (m1 m2 : multiset α) :
_root_.disjoint m1.to_finset m2.to_finset ↔ m1.disjoint m2 :=
begin
rw finset.disjoint_iff_ne,
split,
{ intro h,
intros a ha1 ha2,
rw ← multiset.mem_to_finset at ha1 ha2,
exact h _ ha1 _ ha2 rfl },
{ rintros h a ha b hb rfl,
rw multiset.mem_to_finset at ha hb,
exact h ha hb }
end
end multiset
|
2ef17c8c3c6b38efcf0561b2b4774bac6a76c16e | 74d9d5f45c6ce5c4f2faf215c04a68eab55fe525 | /src/differentiability/derivative.lean | b2dd3cc231f327507cc470af7cf0a807d3c5dc7a | [] | no_license | joshpoll/differential_geometry | 290bb8a934ca3b3b6b707d810e6d4b941710b710 | 57e00a7e37b7c4c73c847429171ff63d3a48def5 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,551,626,391 | 1,527,747,643,000 | 1,527,747,643,000 | 135,014,993 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,919 | lean | -- http://www.docentes.unal.edu.co/eacostag/docs/FreCarat_Acosta.pdf
-- Eventually (maybe): http://mathlab.math.scu.edu.tw/mp/pdf/S22N14.pdf
-- TODO: try to formalize using arbitrary normed vector spaces.
-- If that is too much work, fall back to ℝ → ℝ and build up
import order.filter analysis.topology.continuity analysis.real .continuity tactic.ring .normed_space data.vector
open lattice clm
noncomputable theory
variables {k : Type*} [normed_field k]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_space k E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_space k F]
variables {G : Type*} [normed_space k G]
include k
local notation L `⬝`:70 v := clm_app_pair ⟨L, v⟩
local notation M `∘clm` L := clm_comp L M
namespace derivative
section
def is_ptws_diff (f : E → F) (a : E) (f'_a : clm E F) :=
∃ φ : E → clm E F,
(∀ x, f x = f a + (φ x)⬝(x - a)) ∧
is_ptws_cont φ a ∧
f'_a = φ a
def is_diff (f : E → F) (f' : E → clm E F) := ∀ a : E, is_ptws_diff f a (f' a)
-- the differential operator for pointwise differentiability
-- it's a type, not a function
def ptws_D (f : E → F) (a : E) := { f'_a : clm E F // is_ptws_diff f a f'_a }
-- the differential operator
-- it's a type, not a function
def D (f : E → F) := { f' : E → clm E F // is_diff f f' }
-- TODO: not sure which one to take as *the* definition
-- will depend on approach taken for C^k theorems
-- might be the case that it's easier to prove the composability thms with one or the other
def is_cont_diff (f : E → F) (f' : E → clm E F) := is_diff f f' ∧ continuous f'
def is_cont_diff_caratheodory (f : E → F) (f' : E → clm E F) :=
∃ φ : E × E → clm E F,
(∀ x y, f x = f y + (φ ⟨x, y⟩)⬝(x - y)) ∧
continuous φ ∧
(∀ x, f' x = φ ⟨x, x⟩)
-- this shoudl just be a fold
def is_k_cont_diff : Π (n : ℕ), (E → F) → vector (E → clm /- k -/ E F) n → Prop
| 0 f _ := continuous f
| (n + 1) f f'_vec := sorry /- need to fold over the vector and produce an and-ed collection of differentiability and continuity assertions. should it be is_diff and then one is_cont_diff or is_cont_diff's all the way down? -/
local notation `C` := is_k_cont_diff
def is_smooth (f : E → F) /- stream of derivatives -/ := ∀ n, C n f /- nth derivative -/sorry
-- smooth (infinitely differentiable). maybe want C^k first?
-- frechet
-- caratheodory <=> frechet
-- diff => continuity
def diff_im_cont {f : E → F} {a : E} {f'_a : clm E F} : is_ptws_diff f a f'_a → is_ptws_cont f a := sorry
-- derivative is unique (although φ is not)
-- cor: we can define the differential operator (how to do that?)
-- chain rule
def chain_rule {f : E → F} {g : F → G} {a : E} {f'_a : clm E F} {g'_fa : clm F G} (Hf : is_ptws_diff f a f'_a) (Hg : is_ptws_diff g (f a) g'_fa) : is_ptws_diff (g ∘ f) a (g'_fa ∘clm f'_a) :=
begin
rcases Hf with ⟨φ, f_pf⟩,
rcases f_pf with ⟨f_form, f_cont, f_deriv⟩,
rcases Hg with ⟨ψ, g_pf⟩,
rcases g_pf with ⟨g_form, g_cont, g_deriv⟩,
split,
split,
{
intros,
calc
(g ∘ f) x = g (f x) : by simp
... = g (f a) + (ψ (f x))⬝(f x - f a) : by apply g_form
... = g (f a) + (ψ (f x))⬝((φ x)⬝(x - a)) : by simp; conv { for (f _) [1] { rw f_form } }; simp
... = g (f a) + ((ψ (f x)) ∘clm (φ x))⬝(x - a) : by sorry,
},
split,
{
-- should just be function composition, but having a different version of composition makes this difficult
admit
},
{
rw [f_deriv, g_deriv]
}
end
-- given f differentiable at a and g differentiable a (f a), shows (g ∘ f) is differentiable at a by producing its derivative
def chain_rule_op {f : E → F} {g : F → G} {a : E} (f'_a : ptws_D f a) (g'_fa : ptws_D g (f a)) : ptws_D (g ∘ f) a :=
⟨g'_fa.1 ∘clm f'_a.1, chain_rule f'_a.2 g'_fa.2⟩
-- derivative of addition'
-- TODO: wrong
-- def add' : is_diff (λ (p : E×E), p.1 + p.2) (λ (a : E×E), (λ (p : E×E), p.1 + p.2⟩)) := sorry
-- derivative of addition (composed with two functions)
-- TODO: proof should follow the analogous continuity proof
def add {f g : E → F} {f' g' : E → clm E F} (hf : is_diff f f') (hg : is_diff g g') : is_diff (f + g) (f' + g') := sorry
-- derivative of smul'
-- derivative of smul
-- generalized product rule
-- will be usurped by multilinear function
-- derivative of bilinear function'
-- derivative of bilinear function
-- derivative of multilinear function'
-- derivative of multilinear function
-- TODO: these can be proven either with Caratheodory or with Banach Fixed Point Theorem. The latter is supposedly easier, but I haven't read it thoroughly yet.
-- https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-28890-2_11.pdf
-- http://www.math.jhu.edu/~jmb/note/invfnthm.pdf
-- http://math.mit.edu/~eyjaffe/Short%20Notes/Miscellaneous/Inverse%20Function%20Theorem.pdf
-- implicit function theorem
-- inverse function theorem
end
end derivative |
92f4e83bcbf3bee3386c85123a7677180dac35b1 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/probability_theory/independence.lean | 4e50232b801b482233477f1e348c837a1531d7be | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,494 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Rémy Degenne
-/
import measure_theory.measure_space
import algebra.big_operators.intervals
import data.finset.intervals
/-!
# Independence of sets of sets and measure spaces (σ-algebras)
* A family of sets of sets `π : ι → set (set α)` is independent with respect to a measure `μ` if for
any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets `f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`,
`μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i) `. It will be used for families of π-systems.
* A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (typically defined on a finer σ-algebra) if the family of sets of measurable sets they
define is independent. I.e., `m : ι → measurable_space α` is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ m i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ m i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i)`.
* Independence of sets (or events in probabilistic parlance) is defined as independence of the
measurable space structures they generate: a set `s` generates the measurable space structure with
measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`.
* Independence of functions (or random variables) is also defined as independence of the measurable
space structures they generate: a function `f` for which we have a measurable space `m` on the
codomain generates `measurable_space.comap f m`.
## Main statements
* TODO: `Indep_of_Indep_sets`: if π-systems are independent as sets of sets, then the
measurable space structures they generate are independent.
* `indep_of_indep_sets`: variant with two π-systems.
## Implementation notes
We provide one main definition of independence:
* `Indep_sets`: independence of a family of sets of sets `pi : ι → set (set α)`.
Three other independence notions are defined using `Indep_sets`:
* `Indep`: independence of a family of measurable space structures `m : ι → measurable_space α`,
* `Indep_set`: independence of a family of sets `s : ι → set α`,
* `Indep_fun`: independence of a family of functions. For measurable spaces
`m : Π (i : ι), measurable_space (β i)`, we consider functions `f : Π (i : ι), α → β i`.
Additionally, we provide four corresponding statements for two measurable space structures (resp.
sets of sets, sets, functions) instead of a family. These properties are denoted by the same names
as for a family, but without a capital letter, for example `indep_fun` is the version of `Indep_fun`
for two functions.
The definition of independence for `Indep_sets` uses finite sets (`finset`). An alternative and
equivalent way of defining independence would have been to use countable sets.
TODO: prove that equivalence.
Most of the definitions and lemma in this file list all variables instead of using the `variables`
keyword at the beginning of a section, for example
`lemma indep.symm {α} {m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} ...` .
This is intentional, to be able to control the order of the `measurable_space` variables. Indeed
when defining `μ` in the example above, the measurable space used is the last one defined, here
`[measurable_space α]`, and not `m₁` or `m₂`.
## References
* Williams, David. Probability with martingales. Cambridge university press, 1991.
Part A, Chapter 4.
-/
open measure_theory measurable_space
open_locale big_operators classical
namespace probability_theory
section definitions
/-- A family of sets of sets `π : ι → set (set α)` is independent with respect to a measure `μ` if
for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i) `.
It will be used for families of pi_systems. -/
def Indep_sets {α ι} [measurable_space α] (π : ι → set (set α)) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) :
Prop :=
∀ (s : finset ι) {f : ι → set α} (H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i), μ (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i)
/-- Two sets of sets `s₁, s₂` are independent with respect to a measure `μ` if for any sets
`t₁ ∈ p₁, t₂ ∈ s₂`, then `μ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = μ (t₁) * μ (t₂)` -/
def indep_sets {α} [measurable_space α] (s1 s2 : set (set α)) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ t1 t2 : set α, t1 ∈ s1 → t2 ∈ s2 → μ (t1 ∩ t2) = μ t1 * μ t2
/-- A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (typically defined on a finer σ-algebra) if the family of sets of measurable sets they
define is independent. `m : ι → measurable_space α` is independent with respect to measure `μ` if
for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ m i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ m i_n`, then `μ (⋂ i in s, f i) = ∏ i in s, μ (f i) `. -/
def Indep {α ι} (m : ι → measurable_space α) [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α . volume_tac) :
Prop :=
Indep_sets (λ x, (m x).measurable_set') μ
/-- Two measurable space structures (or σ-algebras) `m₁, m₂` are independent with respect to a
measure `μ` (defined on a third σ-algebra) if for any sets `t₁ ∈ m₁, t₂ ∈ m₂`,
`μ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = μ (t₁) * μ (t₂)` -/
def indep {α} (m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α) [measurable_space α] (μ : measure α . volume_tac) :
Prop :=
indep_sets (m₁.measurable_set') (m₂.measurable_set') μ
/-- A family of sets is independent if the family of measurable space structures they generate is
independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def Indep_set {α ι} [measurable_space α] (s : ι → set α) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
Indep (λ i, generate_from {s i}) μ
/-- Two sets are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are independent.
For a set `s`, the generated measurable space structure has measurable sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`. -/
def indep_set {α} [measurable_space α] (s t : set α) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
indep (generate_from {s}) (generate_from {t}) μ
/-- A family of functions defined on the same space `α` and taking values in possibly different
spaces, each with a measurable space structure, is independent if the family of measurable space
structures they generate on `α` is independent. For a function `g` with codomain having measurable
space structure `m`, the generated measurable space structure is `measurable_space.comap g m`. -/
def Indep_fun {α ι} [measurable_space α] {β : ι → Type*} (m : Π (x : ι), measurable_space (β x))
(f : Π (x : ι), α → β x) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
Indep (λ x, measurable_space.comap (f x) (m x)) μ
/-- Two functions are independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are
independent. For a function `f` with codomain having measurable space structure `m`, the generated
measurable space structure is `measurable_space.comap f m`. -/
def indep_fun {α β γ} [measurable_space α] (mβ : measurable_space β) (mγ : measurable_space γ)
(f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
indep (measurable_space.comap f mβ) (measurable_space.comap g mγ) μ
end definitions
section indep
lemma indep_sets.symm {α} {s₁ s₂ : set (set α)} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(h : indep_sets s₁ s₂ μ) :
indep_sets s₂ s₁ μ :=
by { intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2, rw [set.inter_comm, mul_comm], exact h t2 t1 ht2 ht1, }
lemma indep.symm {α} {m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(h : indep m₁ m₂ μ) :
indep m₂ m₁ μ :=
indep_sets.symm h
lemma indep_sets_of_indep_sets_of_le_left {α} {s₁ s₂ s₃: set (set α)} [measurable_space α]
{μ : measure α} (h_indep : indep_sets s₁ s₂ μ) (h31 : s₃ ⊆ s₁) :
indep_sets s₃ s₂ μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 (set.mem_of_subset_of_mem h31 ht1) ht2
lemma indep_sets_of_indep_sets_of_le_right {α} {s₁ s₂ s₃: set (set α)} [measurable_space α]
{μ : measure α} (h_indep : indep_sets s₁ s₂ μ) (h32 : s₃ ⊆ s₂) :
indep_sets s₁ s₃ μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 ht1 (set.mem_of_subset_of_mem h32 ht2)
lemma indep_of_indep_of_le_left {α} {m₁ m₂ m₃: measurable_space α} [measurable_space α]
{μ : measure α} (h_indep : indep m₁ m₂ μ) (h31 : m₃ ≤ m₁) :
indep m₃ m₂ μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 (h31 _ ht1) ht2
lemma indep_of_indep_of_le_right {α} {m₁ m₂ m₃: measurable_space α} [measurable_space α]
{μ : measure α} (h_indep : indep m₁ m₂ μ) (h32 : m₃ ≤ m₂) :
indep m₁ m₃ μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 ht1 (h32 _ ht2)
lemma indep_sets.union {α} [measurable_space α] {s₁ s₂ s' : set (set α)} {μ : measure α}
(h₁ : indep_sets s₁ s' μ) (h₂ : indep_sets s₂ s' μ) :
indep_sets (s₁ ∪ s₂) s' μ :=
begin
intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2,
cases (set.mem_union _ _ _).mp ht1 with ht1₁ ht1₂,
{ exact h₁ t1 t2 ht1₁ ht2, },
{ exact h₂ t1 t2 ht1₂ ht2, },
end
@[simp] lemma indep_sets.union_iff {α} [measurable_space α] {s₁ s₂ s' : set (set α)}
{μ : measure α} :
indep_sets (s₁ ∪ s₂) s' μ ↔ indep_sets s₁ s' μ ∧ indep_sets s₂ s' μ :=
⟨λ h, ⟨indep_sets_of_indep_sets_of_le_left h (set.subset_union_left s₁ s₂),
indep_sets_of_indep_sets_of_le_left h (set.subset_union_right s₁ s₂)⟩,
λ h, indep_sets.union h.left h.right⟩
lemma indep_sets.Union {α ι} [measurable_space α] {s : ι → set (set α)} {s' : set (set α)}
{μ : measure α} (hyp : ∀ n, indep_sets (s n) s' μ) :
indep_sets (⋃ n, s n) s' μ :=
begin
intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2,
rw set.mem_Union at ht1,
cases ht1 with n ht1,
exact hyp n t1 t2 ht1 ht2,
end
lemma indep_sets.inter {α} [measurable_space α] {s₁ s' : set (set α)} (s₂ : set (set α))
{μ : measure α} (h₁ : indep_sets s₁ s' μ) :
indep_sets (s₁ ∩ s₂) s' μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h₁ t1 t2 ((set.mem_inter_iff _ _ _).mp ht1).left ht2
lemma indep_sets.Inter {α ι} [measurable_space α] {s : ι → set (set α)} {s' : set (set α)}
{μ : measure α} (h : ∃ n, indep_sets (s n) s' μ) :
indep_sets (⋂ n, s n) s' μ :=
by {intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2, cases h with n h, exact h t1 t2 (set.mem_Inter.mp ht1 n) ht2 }
end indep
/-! ### Deducing `indep` from `Indep` -/
section from_Indep_to_indep
lemma Indep_sets.indep_sets {α ι} {s : ι → set (set α)} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(h_indep : Indep_sets s μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
indep_sets (s i) (s j) μ :=
begin
intros t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂,
have hf_m : ∀ (x : ι), x ∈ {i, j} → (ite (x=i) t₁ t₂) ∈ s x,
{ intros x hx,
cases finset.mem_insert.mp hx with hx hx,
{ simp [hx, ht₁], },
{ simp [finset.mem_singleton.mp hx, hij.symm, ht₂], }, },
have h1 : t₁ = ite (i = i) t₁ t₂, by simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true],
have h2 : t₂ = ite (j = i) t₁ t₂, by simp only [hij.symm, if_false],
have h_inter : (⋂ (t : ι) (H : t ∈ ({i, j} : finset ι)), ite (t = i) t₁ t₂)
= (ite (i = i) t₁ t₂) ∩ (ite (j = i) t₁ t₂),
by simp only [finset.set_bInter_singleton, finset.set_bInter_insert],
have h_prod : (∏ (t : ι) in ({i, j} : finset ι), μ (ite (t = i) t₁ t₂))
= μ (ite (i = i) t₁ t₂) * μ (ite (j = i) t₁ t₂),
by simp only [hij, finset.prod_singleton, finset.prod_insert, not_false_iff,
finset.mem_singleton],
rw h1,
nth_rewrite 1 h2,
nth_rewrite 3 h2,
rw [←h_inter, ←h_prod, h_indep {i, j} hf_m],
end
lemma Indep.indep {α ι} {m : ι → measurable_space α} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α}
(h_indep : Indep m μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
indep (m i) (m j) μ :=
begin
change indep_sets ((λ x, (m x).measurable_set') i) ((λ x, (m x).measurable_set') j) μ,
exact Indep_sets.indep_sets h_indep hij,
end
end from_Indep_to_indep
/-!
## π-system lemma
Independence of measurable spaces is equivalent to independence of generating π-systems.
-/
section from_measurable_spaces_to_sets_of_sets
/-! ### Independence of measurable space structures implies independence of generating π-systems -/
lemma Indep.Indep_sets {α ι} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} {m : ι → measurable_space α}
{s : ι → set (set α)} (hms : ∀ n, m n = measurable_space.generate_from (s n))
(h_indep : Indep m μ) :
Indep_sets s μ :=
begin
refine (λ S f hfs, h_indep S (λ x hxS, _)),
simp_rw hms x,
exact measurable_set_generate_from (hfs x hxS),
end
lemma indep.indep_sets {α} [measurable_space α] {μ : measure α} {s1 s2 : set (set α)}
(h_indep : indep (generate_from s1) (generate_from s2) μ) :
indep_sets s1 s2 μ :=
λ t1 t2 ht1 ht2, h_indep t1 t2 (measurable_set_generate_from ht1) (measurable_set_generate_from ht2)
end from_measurable_spaces_to_sets_of_sets
section from_pi_systems_to_measurable_spaces
/-! ### Independence of generating π-systems implies independence of measurable space structures -/
private lemma indep_sets.indep_aux {α} {m2 : measurable_space α}
{m : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α} [probability_measure μ] {p1 p2 : set (set α)}
(h2 : m2 ≤ m) (hp2 : is_pi_system p2) (hpm2 : m2 = generate_from p2)
(hyp : indep_sets p1 p2 μ) {t1 t2 : set α} (ht1 : t1 ∈ p1) (ht2m : m2.measurable_set' t2) :
μ (t1 ∩ t2) = μ t1 * μ t2 :=
begin
let μ_inter := μ.restrict t1,
let ν := (μ t1) • μ,
have h_univ : μ_inter set.univ = ν set.univ,
by rw [measure.restrict_apply_univ, measure.smul_apply, measure_univ, mul_one],
haveI : finite_measure μ_inter := @restrict.finite_measure α _ t1 μ (measure_lt_top μ t1),
rw [set.inter_comm, ←@measure.restrict_apply α _ μ t1 t2 (h2 t2 ht2m)],
refine ext_on_measurable_space_of_generate_finite m p2 (λ t ht, _) h2 hpm2 hp2 h_univ ht2m,
have ht2 : m.measurable_set' t,
{ refine h2 _ _,
rw hpm2,
exact measurable_set_generate_from ht, },
rw [measure.restrict_apply ht2, measure.smul_apply, set.inter_comm],
exact hyp t1 t ht1 ht,
end
lemma indep_sets.indep {α} {m1 m2 : measurable_space α} {m : measurable_space α}
{μ : measure α} [probability_measure μ] {p1 p2 : set (set α)} (h1 : m1 ≤ m) (h2 : m2 ≤ m)
(hp1 : is_pi_system p1) (hp2 : is_pi_system p2) (hpm1 : m1 = generate_from p1)
(hpm2 : m2 = generate_from p2) (hyp : indep_sets p1 p2 μ) :
indep m1 m2 μ :=
begin
intros t1 t2 ht1 ht2,
let μ_inter := μ.restrict t2,
let ν := (μ t2) • μ,
have h_univ : μ_inter set.univ = ν set.univ,
by rw [measure.restrict_apply_univ, measure.smul_apply, measure_univ, mul_one],
haveI : finite_measure μ_inter := @restrict.finite_measure α _ t2 μ (measure_lt_top μ t2),
rw [mul_comm, ←@measure.restrict_apply α _ μ t2 t1 (h1 t1 ht1)],
refine ext_on_measurable_space_of_generate_finite m p1 (λ t ht, _) h1 hpm1 hp1 h_univ ht1,
have ht1 : m.measurable_set' t,
{ refine h1 _ _,
rw hpm1,
exact measurable_set_generate_from ht, },
rw [measure.restrict_apply ht1, measure.smul_apply, mul_comm],
exact indep_sets.indep_aux h2 hp2 hpm2 hyp ht ht2,
end
end from_pi_systems_to_measurable_spaces
end probability_theory
|
260f36a9761843b901e45bad407882b482709831 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /stage0/src/Lean/Expr.lean | aa4c1a4e0242cdb07a969bc7f1c15a3891860781 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,152 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.KVMap
import Lean.Level
namespace Lean
inductive Literal where
| natVal (val : Nat)
| strVal (val : String)
deriving Inhabited, BEq
protected def Literal.hash : Literal → USize
| Literal.natVal v => hash v
| Literal.strVal v => hash v
instance : Hashable Literal := ⟨Literal.hash⟩
def Literal.lt : Literal → Literal → Bool
| Literal.natVal _, Literal.strVal _ => true
| Literal.natVal v₁, Literal.natVal v₂ => v₁ < v₂
| Literal.strVal v₁, Literal.strVal v₂ => v₁ < v₂
| _, _ => false
instance : HasLess Literal := ⟨fun a b => a.lt b⟩
instance (a b : Literal) : Decidable (a < b) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a.lt b))
inductive BinderInfo where
| default | implicit | strictImplicit | instImplicit | auxDecl
deriving Inhabited, BEq
def BinderInfo.hash : BinderInfo → USize
| BinderInfo.default => 947
| BinderInfo.implicit => 1019
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => 1087
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => 1153
| BinderInfo.auxDecl => 1229
def BinderInfo.isExplicit : BinderInfo → Bool
| BinderInfo.implicit => false
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => false
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => false
| _ => true
instance : Hashable BinderInfo := ⟨BinderInfo.hash⟩
def BinderInfo.isInstImplicit : BinderInfo → Bool
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => true
| _ => false
def BinderInfo.isAuxDecl : BinderInfo → Bool
| BinderInfo.auxDecl => true
| _ => false
abbrev MData := KVMap
abbrev MData.empty : MData := {}
/--
Cached hash code, cached results, and other data for `Expr`.
hash : 32-bits
hasFVar : 1-bit
hasExprMVar : 1-bit
hasLevelMVar : 1-bit
hasLevelParam : 1-bit
nonDepLet : 1-bit
binderInfo : 3-bits
looseBVarRange : 24-bits -/
def Expr.Data := UInt64
instance: Inhabited Expr.Data :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited UInt64)
def Expr.Data.hash (c : Expr.Data) : USize :=
c.toUInt32.toUSize
instance : BEq Expr.Data where
beq (a b : UInt64) := a == b
def Expr.Data.looseBVarRange (c : Expr.Data) : UInt32 :=
(c.shiftRight 40).toUInt32
def Expr.Data.hasFVar (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 32).land 1) == 1
def Expr.Data.hasExprMVar (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 33).land 1) == 1
def Expr.Data.hasLevelMVar (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 34).land 1) == 1
def Expr.Data.hasLevelParam (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 35).land 1) == 1
def Expr.Data.nonDepLet (c : Expr.Data) : Bool :=
((c.shiftRight 36).land 1) == 1
@[extern c inline "(uint8_t)((#1 << 24) >> 61)"]
def Expr.Data.binderInfo (c : Expr.Data) : BinderInfo :=
let bi := (c.shiftLeft 24).shiftRight 61
if bi == 0 then BinderInfo.default
else if bi == 1 then BinderInfo.implicit
else if bi == 2 then BinderInfo.strictImplicit
else if bi == 3 then BinderInfo.instImplicit
else BinderInfo.auxDecl
@[extern c inline "(uint64_t)#1"]
def BinderInfo.toUInt64 : BinderInfo → UInt64
| BinderInfo.default => 0
| BinderInfo.implicit => 1
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => 2
| BinderInfo.instImplicit => 3
| BinderInfo.auxDecl => 4
@[inline] private def Expr.mkDataCore
(h : USize) (looseBVarRange : Nat)
(hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam nonDepLet : Bool) (bi : BinderInfo)
: Expr.Data :=
if looseBVarRange > Nat.pow 2 24 - 1 then panic! "bound variable index is too big"
else
let r : UInt64 :=
h.toUInt32.toUInt64 +
hasFVar.toUInt64.shiftLeft 32 +
hasExprMVar.toUInt64.shiftLeft 33 +
hasLevelMVar.toUInt64.shiftLeft 34 +
hasLevelParam.toUInt64.shiftLeft 35 +
nonDepLet.toUInt64.shiftLeft 36 +
bi.toUInt64.shiftLeft 37 +
looseBVarRange.toUInt64.shiftLeft 40
r
def Expr.mkData (h : USize) (looseBVarRange : Nat := 0) (hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam : Bool := false) : Expr.Data :=
Expr.mkDataCore h looseBVarRange hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam false BinderInfo.default
def Expr.mkDataForBinder (h : USize) (looseBVarRange : Nat) (hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam : Bool) (bi : BinderInfo) : Expr.Data :=
Expr.mkDataCore h looseBVarRange hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam false bi
def Expr.mkDataForLet (h : USize) (looseBVarRange : Nat) (hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam nonDepLet : Bool) : Expr.Data :=
Expr.mkDataCore h looseBVarRange hasFVar hasExprMVar hasLevelMVar hasLevelParam nonDepLet BinderInfo.default
open Expr
abbrev MVarId := Name
abbrev FVarId := Name
/- We use the `E` suffix (short for `Expr`) to avoid collision with keywords.
We considered using «...», but it is too inconvenient to use. -/
inductive Expr where
| bvar : Nat → Data → Expr -- bound variables
| fvar : FVarId → Data → Expr -- free variables
| mvar : MVarId → Data → Expr -- meta variables
| sort : Level → Data → Expr -- Sort
| const : Name → List Level → Data → Expr -- constants
| app : Expr → Expr → Data → Expr -- application
| lam : Name → Expr → Expr → Data → Expr -- lambda abstraction
| forallE : Name → Expr → Expr → Data → Expr -- (dependent) arrow
| letE : Name → Expr → Expr → Expr → Data → Expr -- let expressions
| lit : Literal → Data → Expr -- literals
| mdata : MData → Expr → Data → Expr -- metadata
| proj : Name → Nat → Expr → Data → Expr -- projection
deriving Inhabited
namespace Expr
@[inline] def data : Expr → Data
| bvar _ d => d
| fvar _ d => d
| mvar _ d => d
| sort _ d => d
| const _ _ d => d
| app _ _ d => d
| lam _ _ _ d => d
| forallE _ _ _ d => d
| letE _ _ _ _ d => d
| lit _ d => d
| mdata _ _ d => d
| proj _ _ _ d => d
def ctorName : Expr → String
| bvar _ _ => "bvar"
| fvar _ _ => "fvar"
| mvar _ _ => "mvar"
| sort _ _ => "sort"
| const _ _ _ => "const"
| app _ _ _ => "app"
| lam _ _ _ _ => "lam"
| forallE _ _ _ _ => "forallE"
| letE _ _ _ _ _ => "letE"
| lit _ _ => "lit"
| mdata _ _ _ => "mdata"
| proj _ _ _ _ => "proj"
protected def hash (e : Expr) : USize :=
e.data.hash
instance : Hashable Expr := ⟨Expr.hash⟩
def hasFVar (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.data.hasFVar
def hasExprMVar (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.data.hasExprMVar
def hasLevelMVar (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.data.hasLevelMVar
def hasMVar (e : Expr) : Bool :=
let d := e.data
d.hasExprMVar || d.hasLevelMVar
def hasLevelParam (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.data.hasLevelParam
def looseBVarRange (e : Expr) : Nat :=
e.data.looseBVarRange.toNat
def binderInfo (e : Expr) : BinderInfo :=
e.data.binderInfo
@[export lean_expr_hash] def hashEx : Expr → USize := hash
@[export lean_expr_has_fvar] def hasFVarEx : Expr → Bool := hasFVar
@[export lean_expr_has_expr_mvar] def hasExprMVarEx : Expr → Bool := hasExprMVar
@[export lean_expr_has_level_mvar] def hasLevelMVarEx : Expr → Bool := hasLevelMVar
@[export lean_expr_has_mvar] def hasMVarEx : Expr → Bool := hasMVar
@[export lean_expr_has_level_param] def hasLevelParamEx : Expr → Bool := hasLevelParam
@[export lean_expr_loose_bvar_range] def looseBVarRangeEx (e : Expr) : UInt32 := e.data.looseBVarRange
@[export lean_expr_binder_info] def binderInfoEx : Expr → BinderInfo := binderInfo
end Expr
def mkLit (l : Literal) : Expr :=
Expr.lit l $ mkData (mixHash 3 (hash l))
def mkNatLit (n : Nat) : Expr :=
mkLit (Literal.natVal n)
def mkStrLit (s : String) : Expr :=
mkLit (Literal.strVal s)
def mkConst (n : Name) (lvls : List Level := []) : Expr :=
Expr.const n lvls $ mkData (mixHash 5 $ mixHash (hash n) (hash lvls)) 0 false false (lvls.any Level.hasMVar) (lvls.any Level.hasParam)
def Literal.type : Literal → Expr
| Literal.natVal _ => mkConst `Nat
| Literal.strVal _ => mkConst `String
@[export lean_lit_type]
def Literal.typeEx : Literal → Expr := Literal.type
def mkBVar (idx : Nat) : Expr :=
Expr.bvar idx $ mkData (mixHash 7 $ hash idx) (idx+1)
def mkSort (lvl : Level) : Expr :=
Expr.sort lvl $ mkData (mixHash 11 $ hash lvl) 0 false false lvl.hasMVar lvl.hasParam
def mkFVar (fvarId : FVarId) : Expr :=
Expr.fvar fvarId $ mkData (mixHash 13 $ hash fvarId) 0 true
def mkMVar (fvarId : MVarId) : Expr :=
Expr.mvar fvarId $ mkData (mixHash 17 $ hash fvarId) 0 false true
def mkMData (d : MData) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
Expr.mdata d e $ mkData (mixHash 19 $ hash e) e.looseBVarRange e.hasFVar e.hasExprMVar e.hasLevelMVar e.hasLevelParam
def mkProj (s : Name) (i : Nat) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
Expr.proj s i e $ mkData (mixHash 23 $ mixHash (hash s) $ mixHash (hash i) (hash e))
e.looseBVarRange e.hasFVar e.hasExprMVar e.hasLevelMVar e.hasLevelParam
def mkApp (f a : Expr) : Expr :=
Expr.app f a $ mkData (mixHash 29 $ mixHash (hash f) (hash a))
(Nat.max f.looseBVarRange a.looseBVarRange)
(f.hasFVar || a.hasFVar)
(f.hasExprMVar || a.hasExprMVar)
(f.hasLevelMVar || a.hasLevelMVar)
(f.hasLevelParam || a.hasLevelParam)
def mkLambda (x : Name) (bi : BinderInfo) (t : Expr) (b : Expr) : Expr :=
-- let x := x.eraseMacroScopes
Expr.lam x t b $ mkDataForBinder (mixHash 31 $ mixHash (hash t) (hash b))
(Nat.max t.looseBVarRange (b.looseBVarRange - 1))
(t.hasFVar || b.hasFVar)
(t.hasExprMVar || b.hasExprMVar)
(t.hasLevelMVar || b.hasLevelMVar)
(t.hasLevelParam || b.hasLevelParam)
bi
def mkForall (x : Name) (bi : BinderInfo) (t : Expr) (b : Expr) : Expr :=
-- let x := x.eraseMacroScopes
Expr.forallE x t b $ mkDataForBinder (mixHash 37 $ mixHash (hash t) (hash b))
(Nat.max t.looseBVarRange (b.looseBVarRange - 1))
(t.hasFVar || b.hasFVar)
(t.hasExprMVar || b.hasExprMVar)
(t.hasLevelMVar || b.hasLevelMVar)
(t.hasLevelParam || b.hasLevelParam)
bi
/- Return `Unit -> type`. Do not confuse with `Thunk type` -/
def mkSimpleThunkType (type : Expr) : Expr :=
mkForall Name.anonymous BinderInfo.default (Lean.mkConst `Unit) type
/- Return `fun (_ : Unit), e` -/
def mkSimpleThunk (type : Expr) : Expr :=
mkLambda `_ BinderInfo.default (Lean.mkConst `Unit) type
def mkLet (x : Name) (t : Expr) (v : Expr) (b : Expr) (nonDep : Bool := false) : Expr :=
-- let x := x.eraseMacroScopes
Expr.letE x t v b $ mkDataForLet (mixHash 41 $ mixHash (hash t) $ mixHash (hash v) (hash b))
(Nat.max (Nat.max t.looseBVarRange v.looseBVarRange) (b.looseBVarRange - 1))
(t.hasFVar || v.hasFVar || b.hasFVar)
(t.hasExprMVar || v.hasExprMVar || b.hasExprMVar)
(t.hasLevelMVar || v.hasLevelMVar || b.hasLevelMVar)
(t.hasLevelParam || v.hasLevelParam || b.hasLevelParam)
nonDep
@[export lean_expr_mk_bvar] def mkBVarEx : Nat → Expr := mkBVar
@[export lean_expr_mk_fvar] def mkFVarEx : FVarId → Expr := mkFVar
@[export lean_expr_mk_mvar] def mkMVarEx : MVarId → Expr := mkMVar
@[export lean_expr_mk_sort] def mkSortEx : Level → Expr := mkSort
@[export lean_expr_mk_const] def mkConstEx (c : Name) (lvls : List Level) : Expr := mkConst c lvls
@[export lean_expr_mk_app] def mkAppEx : Expr → Expr → Expr := mkApp
@[export lean_expr_mk_lambda] def mkLambdaEx (n : Name) (d b : Expr) (bi : BinderInfo) : Expr := mkLambda n bi d b
@[export lean_expr_mk_forall] def mkForallEx (n : Name) (d b : Expr) (bi : BinderInfo) : Expr := mkForall n bi d b
@[export lean_expr_mk_let] def mkLetEx (n : Name) (t v b : Expr) : Expr := mkLet n t v b
@[export lean_expr_mk_lit] def mkLitEx : Literal → Expr := mkLit
@[export lean_expr_mk_mdata] def mkMDataEx : MData → Expr → Expr := mkMData
@[export lean_expr_mk_proj] def mkProjEx : Name → Nat → Expr → Expr := mkProj
def mkAppN (f : Expr) (args : Array Expr) : Expr :=
args.foldl mkApp f
private partial def mkAppRangeAux (n : Nat) (args : Array Expr) (i : Nat) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
if i < n then mkAppRangeAux n args (i+1) (mkApp e (args.get! i)) else e
/-- `mkAppRange f i j #[a_1, ..., a_i, ..., a_j, ... ]` ==> the expression `f a_i ... a_{j-1}` -/
def mkAppRange (f : Expr) (i j : Nat) (args : Array Expr) : Expr :=
mkAppRangeAux j args i f
def mkAppRev (fn : Expr) (revArgs : Array Expr) : Expr :=
revArgs.foldr (fun a r => mkApp r a) fn
namespace Expr
-- TODO: implement it in Lean
@[extern "lean_expr_dbg_to_string"]
constant dbgToString (e : @& Expr) : String
@[extern "lean_expr_quick_lt"]
constant quickLt (a : @& Expr) (b : @& Expr) : Bool
@[extern "lean_expr_lt"]
constant lt (a : @& Expr) (b : @& Expr) : Bool
/- Return true iff `a` and `b` are alpha equivalent.
Binder annotations are ignored. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_eqv"]
constant eqv (a : @& Expr) (b : @& Expr) : Bool
instance : BEq Expr where
beq := Expr.eqv
/- Return true iff `a` and `b` are equal.
Binder names and annotations are taking into account. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_equal"]
constant equal (a : @& Expr) (b : @& Expr) : Bool
def isSort : Expr → Bool
| sort _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isProp : Expr → Bool
| sort (Level.zero ..) _ => true
| _ => false
def isBVar : Expr → Bool
| bvar _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isMVar : Expr → Bool
| mvar _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isFVar : Expr → Bool
| fvar _ _ => true
| _ => false
def isApp : Expr → Bool
| app .. => true
| _ => false
def isProj : Expr → Bool
| proj .. => true
| _ => false
def isConst : Expr → Bool
| const .. => true
| _ => false
def isConstOf : Expr → Name → Bool
| const n _ _, m => n == m
| _, _ => false
def isForall : Expr → Bool
| forallE .. => true
| _ => false
def isLambda : Expr → Bool
| lam .. => true
| _ => false
def isBinding : Expr → Bool
| lam .. => true
| forallE .. => true
| _ => false
def isLet : Expr → Bool
| letE .. => true
| _ => false
def isMData : Expr → Bool
| mdata .. => true
| _ => false
def isLit : Expr → Bool
| lit .. => true
| _ => false
def getAppFn : Expr → Expr
| app f a _ => getAppFn f
| e => e
def getAppNumArgsAux : Expr → Nat → Nat
| app f a _, n => getAppNumArgsAux f (n+1)
| e, n => n
def getAppNumArgs (e : Expr) : Nat :=
getAppNumArgsAux e 0
private def getAppArgsAux : Expr → Array Expr → Nat → Array Expr
| app f a _, as, i => getAppArgsAux f (as.set! i a) (i-1)
| _, as, _ => as
@[inline] def getAppArgs (e : Expr) : Array Expr :=
let dummy := mkSort levelZero
let nargs := e.getAppNumArgs
getAppArgsAux e (mkArray nargs dummy) (nargs-1)
private def getAppRevArgsAux : Expr → Array Expr → Array Expr
| app f a _, as => getAppRevArgsAux f (as.push a)
| _, as => as
@[inline] def getAppRevArgs (e : Expr) : Array Expr :=
getAppRevArgsAux e (Array.mkEmpty e.getAppNumArgs)
@[specialize] def withAppAux (k : Expr → Array Expr → α) : Expr → Array Expr → Nat → α
| app f a _, as, i => withAppAux k f (as.set! i a) (i-1)
| f, as, i => k f as
@[inline] def withApp (e : Expr) (k : Expr → Array Expr → α) : α :=
let dummy := mkSort levelZero
let nargs := e.getAppNumArgs
withAppAux k e (mkArray nargs dummy) (nargs-1)
@[specialize] private def withAppRevAux (k : Expr → Array Expr → α) : Expr → Array Expr → α
| app f a _, as => withAppRevAux k f (as.push a)
| f, as => k f as
@[inline] def withAppRev (e : Expr) (k : Expr → Array Expr → α) : α :=
withAppRevAux k e (Array.mkEmpty e.getAppNumArgs)
def getRevArgD : Expr → Nat → Expr → Expr
| app f a _, 0, _ => a
| app f _ _, i+1, v => getRevArgD f i v
| _, _, v => v
def getRevArg! : Expr → Nat → Expr
| app f a _, 0 => a
| app f _ _, i+1 => getRevArg! f i
| _, _ => panic! "invalid index"
@[inline] def getArg! (e : Expr) (i : Nat) (n := e.getAppNumArgs) : Expr :=
getRevArg! e (n - i - 1)
@[inline] def getArgD (e : Expr) (i : Nat) (v₀ : Expr) (n := e.getAppNumArgs) : Expr :=
getRevArgD e (n - i - 1) v₀
def isAppOf (e : Expr) (n : Name) : Bool :=
match e.getAppFn with
| const c _ _ => c == n
| _ => false
def isAppOfArity : Expr → Name → Nat → Bool
| const c _ _, n, 0 => c == n
| app f _ _, n, a+1 => isAppOfArity f n a
| _, _, _ => false
def appFn! : Expr → Expr
| app f _ _ => f
| _ => panic! "application expected"
def appArg! : Expr → Expr
| app _ a _ => a
| _ => panic! "application expected"
def isNatLit : Expr → Bool
| lit (Literal.natVal _) _ => true
| _ => false
def natLit? : Expr → Option Nat
| lit (Literal.natVal v) _ => v
| _ => none
def isStringLit : Expr → Bool
| lit (Literal.strVal _) _ => true
| _ => false
def isCharLit (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.isAppOfArity `Char.ofNat 1 && e.appArg!.isNatLit
def constName! : Expr → Name
| const n _ _ => n
| _ => panic! "constant expected"
def constName? : Expr → Option Name
| const n _ _ => some n
| _ => none
def constLevels! : Expr → List Level
| const _ ls _ => ls
| _ => panic! "constant expected"
def bvarIdx! : Expr → Nat
| bvar idx _ => idx
| _ => panic! "bvar expected"
def fvarId! : Expr → FVarId
| fvar n _ => n
| _ => panic! "fvar expected"
def mvarId! : Expr → MVarId
| mvar n _ => n
| _ => panic! "mvar expected"
def bindingName! : Expr → Name
| forallE n _ _ _ => n
| lam n _ _ _ => n
| _ => panic! "binding expected"
def bindingDomain! : Expr → Expr
| forallE _ d _ _ => d
| lam _ d _ _ => d
| _ => panic! "binding expected"
def bindingBody! : Expr → Expr
| forallE _ _ b _ => b
| lam _ _ b _ => b
| _ => panic! "binding expected"
def bindingInfo! : Expr → BinderInfo
| forallE _ _ _ c => c.binderInfo
| lam _ _ _ c => c.binderInfo
| _ => panic! "binding expected"
def letName! : Expr → Name
| letE n _ _ _ _ => n
| _ => panic! "let expression expected"
def consumeMData : Expr → Expr
| mdata _ e _ => consumeMData e
| e => e
def hasLooseBVars (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.looseBVarRange > 0
/- Remark: the following function assumes `e` does not have loose bound variables. -/
def isArrow (e : Expr) : Bool :=
match e with
| forallE _ _ b _ => !b.hasLooseBVars
| _ => false
@[extern "lean_expr_has_loose_bvar"]
constant hasLooseBVar (e : @& Expr) (bvarIdx : @& Nat) : Bool
/-- Return true if `e` contains the loose bound variable `bvarIdx` in an explicit parameter, or in the range if `tryRange == true`. -/
def hasLooseBVarInExplicitDomain : Expr → Nat → Bool → Bool
| Expr.forallE _ d b c, bvarIdx, tryRange => (c.binderInfo.isExplicit && hasLooseBVar d bvarIdx) || hasLooseBVarInExplicitDomain b (bvarIdx+1) tryRange
| e, bvarIdx, tryRange => tryRange && hasLooseBVar e bvarIdx
/--
Lower the loose bound variables `>= s` in `e` by `d`.
That is, a loose bound variable `bvar i`.
`i >= s` is mapped into `bvar (i-d)`.
Remark: if `s < d`, then result is `e` -/
@[extern "lean_expr_lower_loose_bvars"]
constant lowerLooseBVars (e : @& Expr) (s d : @& Nat) : Expr
/--
Lift loose bound variables `>= s` in `e` by `d`. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_lift_loose_bvars"]
constant liftLooseBVars (e : @& Expr) (s d : @& Nat) : Expr
/--
`inferImplicit e numParams considerRange` updates the first `numParams` parameter binder annotations of the `e` forall type.
It marks any parameter with an explicit binder annotation if there is another explicit arguments that depends on it or
the resulting type if `considerRange == true`.
Remark: we use this function to infer the bind annotations of inductive datatype constructors, and structure projections.
When the `{}` annotation is used in these commands, we set `considerRange == false`.
-/
def inferImplicit : Expr → Nat → Bool → Expr
| Expr.forallE n d b c, i+1, considerRange =>
let b := inferImplicit b i considerRange
let newInfo := if c.binderInfo.isExplicit && hasLooseBVarInExplicitDomain b 0 considerRange then BinderInfo.implicit else c.binderInfo
mkForall n newInfo d b
| e, 0, _ => e
| e, _, _ => e
/-- Instantiate the loose bound variables in `e` using `subst`.
That is, a loose `Expr.bvar i` is replaced with `subst[i]`. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate"]
constant instantiate (e : @& Expr) (subst : @& Array Expr) : Expr
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate1"]
constant instantiate1 (e : @& Expr) (subst : @& Expr) : Expr
/-- Similar to instantiate, but `Expr.bvar i` is replaced with `subst[subst.size - i - 1]` -/
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate_rev"]
constant instantiateRev (e : @& Expr) (subst : @& Array Expr) : Expr
/-- Similar to `instantiate`, but consider only the variables `xs` in the range `[beginIdx, endIdx)`.
Function panics if `beginIdx <= endIdx <= xs.size` does not hold. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate_range"]
constant instantiateRange (e : @& Expr) (beginIdx endIdx : @& Nat) (xs : @& Array Expr) : Expr
/-- Similar to `instantiateRev`, but consider only the variables `xs` in the range `[beginIdx, endIdx)`.
Function panics if `beginIdx <= endIdx <= xs.size` does not hold. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_instantiate_rev_range"]
constant instantiateRevRange (e : @& Expr) (beginIdx endIdx : @& Nat) (xs : @& Array Expr) : Expr
/-- Replace free variables `xs` with loose bound variables. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_abstract"]
constant abstract (e : @& Expr) (xs : @& Array Expr) : Expr
/-- Similar to `abstract`, but consider only the first `min n xs.size` entries in `xs`. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_abstract_range"]
constant abstractRange (e : @& Expr) (n : @& Nat) (xs : @& Array Expr) : Expr
/-- Replace occurrences of the free variable `fvar` in `e` with `v` -/
def replaceFVar (e : Expr) (fvar : Expr) (v : Expr) : Expr :=
(e.abstract #[fvar]).instantiate1 v
/-- Replace occurrences of the free variable `fvarId` in `e` with `v` -/
def replaceFVarId (e : Expr) (fvarId : FVarId) (v : Expr) : Expr :=
replaceFVar e (mkFVar fvarId) v
/-- Replace occurrences of the free variables `fvars` in `e` with `vs` -/
def replaceFVars (e : Expr) (fvars : Array Expr) (vs : Array Expr) : Expr :=
(e.abstract fvars).instantiateRev vs
instance : ToString Expr where
toString := Expr.dbgToString
def isAtomic : Expr → Bool
| Expr.const _ _ _ => true
| Expr.sort _ _ => true
| Expr.bvar _ _ => true
| Expr.lit _ _ => true
| Expr.mvar _ _ => true
| Expr.fvar _ _ => true
| _ => false
end Expr
def mkAppB (f a b : Expr) := mkApp (mkApp f a) b
def mkApp2 (f a b : Expr) := mkAppB f a b
def mkApp3 (f a b c : Expr) := mkApp (mkAppB f a b) c
def mkApp4 (f a b c d : Expr) := mkAppB (mkAppB f a b) c d
def mkApp5 (f a b c d e : Expr) := mkApp (mkApp4 f a b c d) e
def mkApp6 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ : Expr) := mkAppB (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂
def mkApp7 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ e₃ : Expr) := mkApp3 (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂ e₃
def mkApp8 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ : Expr) := mkApp4 (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄
def mkApp9 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ e₅ : Expr) := mkApp5 (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ e₅
def mkApp10 (f a b c d e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ e₅ e₆ : Expr) := mkApp6 (mkApp4 f a b c d) e₁ e₂ e₃ e₄ e₅ e₆
def mkDecIsTrue (pred proof : Expr) :=
mkAppB (mkConst `Decidable.isTrue) pred proof
def mkDecIsFalse (pred proof : Expr) :=
mkAppB (mkConst `Decidable.isFalse) pred proof
open Std (HashMap HashSet PHashMap PHashSet)
abbrev ExprMap (α : Type) := HashMap Expr α
abbrev PersistentExprMap (α : Type) := PHashMap Expr α
abbrev ExprSet := HashSet Expr
abbrev PersistentExprSet := PHashSet Expr
abbrev PExprSet := PersistentExprSet
/- Auxiliary type for forcing `==` to be structural equality for `Expr` -/
structure ExprStructEq where
val : Expr
deriving Inhabited
instance : Coe Expr ExprStructEq := ⟨ExprStructEq.mk⟩
namespace ExprStructEq
protected def beq : ExprStructEq → ExprStructEq → Bool
| ⟨e₁⟩, ⟨e₂⟩ => Expr.equal e₁ e₂
protected def hash : ExprStructEq → USize
| ⟨e⟩ => e.hash
instance : BEq ExprStructEq := ⟨ExprStructEq.beq⟩
instance : Hashable ExprStructEq := ⟨ExprStructEq.hash⟩
instance : ToString ExprStructEq := ⟨fun e => toString e.val⟩
end ExprStructEq
abbrev ExprStructMap (α : Type) := HashMap ExprStructEq α
abbrev PersistentExprStructMap (α : Type) := PHashMap ExprStructEq α
namespace Expr
private partial def mkAppRevRangeAux (revArgs : Array Expr) (start : Nat) (b : Expr) (i : Nat) : Expr :=
if i == start then b
else
let i := i - 1
mkAppRevRangeAux revArgs start (mkApp b (revArgs.get! i)) i
/-- `mkAppRevRange f b e args == mkAppRev f (revArgs.extract b e)` -/
def mkAppRevRange (f : Expr) (beginIdx endIdx : Nat) (revArgs : Array Expr) : Expr :=
mkAppRevRangeAux revArgs beginIdx f endIdx
private def betaRevAux (revArgs : Array Expr) (sz : Nat) : Expr → Nat → Expr
| Expr.lam _ _ b _, i =>
if i + 1 < sz then
betaRevAux revArgs sz b (i+1)
else
let n := sz - (i + 1)
mkAppRevRange (b.instantiateRange n sz revArgs) 0 n revArgs
| Expr.mdata _ b _, i => betaRevAux revArgs sz b i
| b, i =>
let n := sz - i
mkAppRevRange (b.instantiateRange n sz revArgs) 0 n revArgs
/-- If `f` is a lambda expression, than "beta-reduce" it using `revArgs`.
This function is often used with `getAppRev` or `withAppRev`.
Examples:
- `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[]` ==> `fun x y => t x y`
- `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[a]` ==> `fun y => t a y`
- `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[a, b]` ==> t b a`
- `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[a, b, c, d]` ==> t d c b a`
Suppose `t` is `(fun x y => t x y) a b c d`, then
`args := t.getAppRev` is `#[d, c, b, a]`,
and `betaRev (fun x y => t x y) #[d, c, b, a]` is `t a b c d`. -/
def betaRev (f : Expr) (revArgs : Array Expr) : Expr :=
if revArgs.size == 0 then f
else betaRevAux revArgs revArgs.size f 0
def isHeadBetaTargetFn : Expr → Bool
| Expr.lam _ _ _ _ => true
| Expr.mdata _ b _ => isHeadBetaTargetFn b
| _ => false
def headBeta (e : Expr) : Expr :=
let f := e.getAppFn
if f.isHeadBetaTargetFn then betaRev f e.getAppRevArgs else e
def isHeadBetaTarget (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.getAppFn.isHeadBetaTargetFn
private def etaExpandedBody : Expr → Nat → Nat → Option Expr
| app f (bvar j _) _, n+1, i => if j == i then etaExpandedBody f n (i+1) else none
| _, n+1, _ => none
| f, 0, _ => if f.hasLooseBVars then none else some f
private def etaExpandedAux : Expr → Nat → Option Expr
| lam _ _ b _, n => etaExpandedAux b (n+1)
| e, n => etaExpandedBody e n 0
/--
If `e` is of the form `(fun x₁ ... xₙ => f x₁ ... xₙ)` and `f` does not contain `x₁`, ..., `xₙ`,
then return `some f`. Otherwise, return `none`.
It assumes `e` does not have loose bound variables.
Remark: `ₙ` may be 0 -/
def etaExpanded? (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
etaExpandedAux e 0
/-- Similar to `etaExpanded?`, but only succeeds if `ₙ ≥ 1`. -/
def etaExpandedStrict? : Expr → Option Expr
| lam _ _ b _ => etaExpandedAux b 1
| _ => none
def getOptParamDefault? (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
if e.isAppOfArity `optParam 2 then
some e.appArg!
else
none
def getAutoParamTactic? (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
if e.isAppOfArity `autoParam 2 then
some e.appArg!
else
none
def isOptParam (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.isAppOfArity `optParam 2
def isAutoParam (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.isAppOfArity `autoParam 2
/-- Return true iff `e` contains a free variable which statisfies `p`. -/
@[inline] def hasAnyFVar (e : Expr) (p : FVarId → Bool) : Bool :=
let rec @[specialize] visit (e : Expr) := if !e.hasFVar then false else
match e with
| Expr.forallE _ d b _ => visit d || visit b
| Expr.lam _ d b _ => visit d || visit b
| Expr.mdata _ e _ => visit e
| Expr.letE _ t v b _ => visit t || visit v || visit b
| Expr.app f a _ => visit f || visit a
| Expr.proj _ _ e _ => visit e
| e@(Expr.fvar fvarId _) => p fvarId
| e => false
visit e
def containsFVar (e : Expr) (fvarId : FVarId) : Bool :=
e.hasAnyFVar (· == fvarId)
/- The update functions here are defined using C code. They will try to avoid
allocating new values using pointer equality.
The hypotheses `(h : e.is... = true)` are used to ensure Lean will not crash
at runtime.
The `update*!` functions are inlined and provide a convenient way of using the
update proofs without providing proofs.
Note that if they are used under a match-expression, the compiler will eliminate
the double-match. -/
@[extern "lean_expr_update_app"]
def updateApp (e : Expr) (newFn : Expr) (newArg : Expr) (h : e.isApp = true) : Expr :=
mkApp newFn newArg
@[inline] def updateApp! (e : Expr) (newFn : Expr) (newArg : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| app fn arg c => updateApp (app fn arg c) newFn newArg rfl
| _ => panic! "application expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_const"]
def updateConst (e : Expr) (newLevels : List Level) (h : e.isConst = true) : Expr :=
mkConst e.constName! newLevels
@[inline] def updateConst! (e : Expr) (newLevels : List Level) : Expr :=
match e with
| const n ls c => updateConst (const n ls c) newLevels rfl
| _ => panic! "constant expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_sort"]
def updateSort (e : Expr) (newLevel : Level) (h : e.isSort = true) : Expr :=
mkSort newLevel
@[inline] def updateSort! (e : Expr) (newLevel : Level) : Expr :=
match e with
| sort l c => updateSort (sort l c) newLevel rfl
| _ => panic! "level expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_proj"]
def updateProj (e : Expr) (newExpr : Expr) (h : e.isProj = true) : Expr :=
match e with
| proj s i _ _ => mkProj s i newExpr
| _ => e -- unreachable because of `h`
@[extern "lean_expr_update_mdata"]
def updateMData (e : Expr) (newExpr : Expr) (h : e.isMData = true) : Expr :=
match e with
| mdata d _ _ => mkMData d newExpr
| _ => e -- unreachable because of `h`
@[inline] def updateMData! (e : Expr) (newExpr : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| mdata d e c => updateMData (mdata d e c) newExpr rfl
| _ => panic! "mdata expected"
@[inline] def updateProj! (e : Expr) (newExpr : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| proj s i e c => updateProj (proj s i e c) newExpr rfl
| _ => panic! "proj expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_forall"]
def updateForall (e : Expr) (newBinfo : BinderInfo) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) (h : e.isForall = true) : Expr :=
mkForall e.bindingName! newBinfo newDomain newBody
@[inline] def updateForall! (e : Expr) (newBinfo : BinderInfo) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| forallE n d b c => updateForall (forallE n d b c) newBinfo newDomain newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "forall expected"
@[inline] def updateForallE! (e : Expr) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| forallE n d b c => updateForall (forallE n d b c) c.binderInfo newDomain newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "forall expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_lambda"]
def updateLambda (e : Expr) (newBinfo : BinderInfo) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) (h : e.isLambda = true) : Expr :=
mkLambda e.bindingName! newBinfo newDomain newBody
@[inline] def updateLambda! (e : Expr) (newBinfo : BinderInfo) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| lam n d b c => updateLambda (lam n d b c) newBinfo newDomain newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "lambda expected"
@[inline] def updateLambdaE! (e : Expr) (newDomain : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| lam n d b c => updateLambda (lam n d b c) c.binderInfo newDomain newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "lambda expected"
@[extern "lean_expr_update_let"]
def updateLet (e : Expr) (newType : Expr) (newVal : Expr) (newBody : Expr) (h : e.isLet = true) : Expr :=
mkLet e.letName! newType newVal newBody
@[inline] def updateLet! (e : Expr) (newType : Expr) (newVal : Expr) (newBody : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| letE n t v b c => updateLet (letE n t v b c) newType newVal newBody rfl
| _ => panic! "let expression expected"
def updateFn : Expr → Expr → Expr
| e@(app f a _), g => e.updateApp! (updateFn f g) a
| _, g => g
/- Instantiate level parameters -/
@[inline] def instantiateLevelParamsCore (s : Name → Option Level) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
let rec @[specialize] visit (e : Expr) : Expr :=
if !e.hasLevelParam then e
else match e with
| lam n d b _ => e.updateLambdaE! (visit d) (visit b)
| forallE n d b _ => e.updateForallE! (visit d) (visit b)
| letE n t v b _ => e.updateLet! (visit t) (visit v) (visit b)
| app f a _ => e.updateApp! (visit f) (visit a)
| proj _ _ s _ => e.updateProj! (visit s)
| mdata _ b _ => e.updateMData! (visit b)
| const _ us _ => e.updateConst! (us.map (fun u => u.instantiateParams s))
| sort u _ => e.updateSort! (u.instantiateParams s)
| e => e
visit e
private def getParamSubst : List Name → List Level → Name → Option Level
| p::ps, u::us, p' => if p == p' then some u else getParamSubst ps us p'
| _, _, _ => none
def instantiateLevelParams (e : Expr) (paramNames : List Name) (lvls : List Level) : Expr :=
instantiateLevelParamsCore (getParamSubst paramNames lvls) e
private partial def getParamSubstArray (ps : Array Name) (us : Array Level) (p' : Name) (i : Nat) : Option Level :=
if h : i < ps.size then
let p := ps.get ⟨i, h⟩
if h : i < us.size then
let u := us.get ⟨i, h⟩
if p == p' then some u else getParamSubstArray ps us p' (i+1)
else none
else none
def instantiateLevelParamsArray (e : Expr) (paramNames : Array Name) (lvls : Array Level) : Expr :=
instantiateLevelParamsCore (fun p => getParamSubstArray paramNames lvls p 0) e
/- Annotate `e` with the given option. -/
def setOption (e : Expr) (optionName : Name) [KVMap.Value α] (val : α) : Expr :=
mkMData (MData.empty.set optionName val) e
/- Annotate `e` with `pp.explicit := true`
The delaborator uses `pp` options. -/
def setPPExplicit (e : Expr) (flag : Bool) :=
e.setOption `pp.explicit flag
/- If `e` is an application `f a_1 ... a_n` annotate `f`, `a_1` ... `a_n` with `pp.explicit := false`,
and annotate `e` with `pp.explicit := true`. -/
def setAppPPExplicit (e : Expr) : Expr :=
match e with
| app .. =>
let f := e.getAppFn.setPPExplicit false
let args := e.getAppArgs.map (·.setPPExplicit false)
mkAppN f args |>.setPPExplicit true
| _ => e
end Expr
def mkAnnotation (kind : Name) (e : Expr) : Expr :=
mkMData (KVMap.empty.insert kind (DataValue.ofBool true)) e
def annotation? (kind : Name) (e : Expr) : Option Expr :=
match e with
| Expr.mdata d b _ => if d.size == 1 && d.getBool kind false then some b else none
| _ => none
def mkFreshFVarId {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadNameGenerator m] : m FVarId :=
mkFreshId
def mkFreshMVarId {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [MonadNameGenerator m] : m FVarId :=
mkFreshId
end Lean
|
f4aa10ace2e3f5c9cafca638cde069d940121b33 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/using_bug2.lean | d74e84f60f06871de785061099d86fb6975c969c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 399 | lean | variable {A : Type}
variable {f : A → A → A}
variable {finv : A → A}
premise (h : ∀ x y : A, finv (f x y) = y)
include h
theorem foo₁ : ∀ x y z : A, f x y = f x z → y = z :=
λ x y z, assume e, sorry
theorem foo₂ : ∀ x y z : A, f x y = f x z → y = z :=
λ x y z, assume e,
assert s₁ : finv (f x y) = finv (f x z), by rewrite e,
show y = z, by rewrite *h at s₁; exact s₁
|
86710dc4bda1264894ae447bef6e49cf48f9f498 | e030b0259b777fedcdf73dd966f3f1556d392178 | /tests/lean/run/e4.lean | 2d3dba7f9ea4cfac9b49e52df84d773088789ec8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fgdorais/lean | 17b46a095b70b21fa0790ce74876658dc5faca06 | c3b7c54d7cca7aaa25328f0a5660b6b75fe26055 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,523,590,686 | 1,484,412,902,000 | 1,484,412,902,000 | 38,489,734 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,435,923,380,000 | 1,435,923,379,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 665 | lean | prelude
definition Prop := Type.{0}
definition false : Prop := ∀x : Prop, x
check false
theorem false.elim (C : Prop) (H : false) : C
:= H C
definition Eq {A : Type} (a b : A)
:= ∀ P : A → Prop, P a → P b
check Eq
infix `=`:50 := Eq
theorem refl {A : Type} (a : A) : a = a
:= λ P H, H
definition true : Prop
:= false = false
theorem trivial : true
:= refl false
attribute [elab_as_eliminator]
theorem subst {A : Type} {P : A -> Prop} {a b : A} (H1 : a = b) (H2 : P a) : P b
:= H1 _ H2
theorem symm {A : Type} {a b : A} (H : a = b) : b = a
:= subst H (refl a)
theorem trans {A : Type} {a b c : A} (H1 : a = b) (H2 : b = c) : a = c
:= subst H2 H1
|
0ac6a324df53c582588487347fc89ac115c32a38 | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/data/int/modeq.lean | 2bd130a2b4f9b05289864fb40414a517a22198cb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,079 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.nat.modeq
import tactic
namespace int
def modeq (n a b : ℤ) := a % n = b % n
notation a ` ≡ `:50 b ` [ZMOD `:50 n `]`:0 := modeq n a b
namespace modeq
variables {n m a b c d : ℤ}
@[refl] protected theorem refl (a : ℤ) : a ≡ a [ZMOD n] := @rfl _ _
@[symm] protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → b ≡ a [ZMOD n] := eq.symm
@[trans] protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → b ≡ c [ZMOD n] → a ≡ c [ZMOD n] := eq.trans
lemma coe_nat_modeq_iff {a b n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
by unfold modeq nat.modeq; rw ← int.coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff; simp [int.coe_nat_mod]
instance : decidable (a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) := by unfold modeq; apply_instance
theorem modeq_zero_iff : a ≡ 0 [ZMOD n] ↔ n ∣ a :=
by rw [modeq, zero_mod, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
theorem modeq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ (n:ℤ) ∣ b - a :=
by rw [modeq, eq_comm];
simp [int.mod_eq_mod_iff_mod_sub_eq_zero, int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, -euclidean_domain.mod_eq_zero]
theorem modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq (d : m ∣ n) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD m] :=
modeq_iff_dvd.2 $ dvd_trans d (modeq_iff_dvd.1 h)
theorem modeq_mul_left' (hc : 0 ≤ c) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [ZMOD (c * n)] :=
or.cases_on (lt_or_eq_of_le hc) (λ hc,
by unfold modeq;
simp [mul_mod_mul_of_pos _ _ hc, (show _ = _, from h)] )
(λ hc, by simp [hc.symm])
theorem modeq_mul_right' (hc : 0 ≤ c) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [ZMOD (n * c)] :=
by rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b, mul_comm n]; exact modeq_mul_left' hc h
theorem modeq_add (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n] :=
modeq_iff_dvd.2 $ by {convert dvd_add (modeq_iff_dvd.1 h₁) (modeq_iff_dvd.1 h₂), ring}
theorem modeq_add_cancel_left (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n]) :
c ≡ d [ZMOD n] :=
have d - c = b + d - (a + c) - (b - a) := by ring,
modeq_iff_dvd.2 $ by { rw [this], exact dvd_sub (modeq_iff_dvd.1 h₂) (modeq_iff_dvd.1 h₁) }
theorem modeq_add_cancel_right (h₁ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n]) :
a ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
by rw [add_comm a, add_comm b] at h₂; exact modeq_add_cancel_left h₁ h₂
theorem mod_modeq (a n) : a % n ≡ a [ZMOD n] := int.mod_mod _ _
theorem modeq_neg (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : -a ≡ -b [ZMOD n] :=
modeq_add_cancel_left h (by simp)
theorem modeq_sub (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) : a - c ≡ b - d [ZMOD n] :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]; exact modeq_add h₁ (modeq_neg h₂)
theorem modeq_mul_left (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [ZMOD n] :=
or.cases_on (le_total 0 c)
(λ hc, modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq (dvd_mul_left _ _) (modeq_mul_left' hc h))
(λ hc, by rw [← neg_neg c, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul _ b];
exact modeq_neg (modeq_of_dvd_of_modeq (dvd_mul_left _ _)
(modeq_mul_left' (neg_nonneg.2 hc) h)))
theorem modeq_mul_right (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [ZMOD n] :=
by rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b]; exact modeq_mul_left c h
theorem modeq_mul (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * d [ZMOD n] :=
(modeq_mul_left _ h₂).trans (modeq_mul_right _ h₁)
theorem modeq_of_modeq_mul_left (m : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD m * n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
by rw [modeq_iff_dvd] at *; exact dvd.trans (dvd_mul_left n m) h
theorem modeq_of_modeq_mul_right (m : ℤ) : a ≡ b [ZMOD n * m] → a ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
mul_comm m n ▸ modeq_of_modeq_mul_left _
lemma modeq_and_modeq_iff_modeq_mul {a b m n : ℤ} (hmn : nat.coprime m.nat_abs n.nat_abs) :
a ≡ b [ZMOD m] ∧ a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ (a ≡ b [ZMOD m * n]) :=
⟨λ h, begin
rw [int.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd, int.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd] at h,
rw [int.modeq.modeq_iff_dvd, ← int.nat_abs_dvd, ← int.dvd_nat_abs,
int.coe_nat_dvd, int.nat_abs_mul],
refine hmn.mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd _ _;
rw [← int.coe_nat_dvd, int.nat_abs_dvd, int.dvd_nat_abs]; tauto
end,
λ h, ⟨int.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_right _ h, int.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_left _ h⟩⟩
lemma gcd_a_modeq (a b : ℕ) : (a : ℤ) * nat.gcd_a a b ≡ nat.gcd a b [ZMOD b] :=
by rw [← add_zero ((a : ℤ) * _), nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab];
exact int.modeq.modeq_add rfl (int.modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 (dvd_mul_right _ _)).symm
theorem modeq_add_fac {a b n : ℤ} (c : ℤ) (ha : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a + n*c ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
calc a + n*c ≡ b + n*c [ZMOD n] : int.modeq.modeq_add ha (int.modeq.refl _)
... ≡ b + 0 [ZMOD n] : int.modeq.modeq_add (int.modeq.refl _)
(int.modeq.modeq_zero_iff.2 (dvd_mul_right _ _))
... ≡ b [ZMOD n] : by simp
open nat
lemma mod_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : coprime a b) : ∃ y : ℤ, a * y ≡ 1 [ZMOD b] :=
⟨ gcd_a a b,
have hgcd : nat.gcd a b = 1, from coprime.gcd_eq_one hab,
calc
↑a * gcd_a a b ≡ ↑a*gcd_a a b + ↑b*gcd_b a b [ZMOD ↑b] : int.modeq.symm $
modeq_add_fac _ $ int.modeq.refl _
... ≡ 1 [ZMOD ↑b] : by rw [←gcd_eq_gcd_ab, hgcd]; reflexivity ⟩
lemma exists_unique_equiv (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (hb : 0 < b) : ∃ z : ℤ, 0 ≤ z ∧ z < b ∧ z ≡ a [ZMOD b] :=
⟨ a % b, int.mod_nonneg _ (ne_of_gt hb),
have a % b < abs b, from int.mod_lt _ (ne_of_gt hb),
by rwa abs_of_pos hb at this,
by simp [int.modeq] ⟩
lemma exists_unique_equiv_nat (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (hb : 0 < b) : ∃ z : ℕ, ↑z < b ∧ ↑z ≡ a [ZMOD b] :=
let ⟨z, hz1, hz2, hz3⟩ := exists_unique_equiv a hb in
⟨z.nat_abs, by split; rw [←int.of_nat_eq_coe, int.of_nat_nat_abs_eq_of_nonneg hz1]; assumption⟩
end modeq
@[simp] lemma mod_mul_right_mod (a b c : ℤ) : a % (b * c) % b = a % b :=
int.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_right _ (int.modeq.mod_modeq _ _)
@[simp] lemma mod_mul_left_mod (a b c : ℤ) : a % (b * c) % c = a % c :=
int.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_left _ (int.modeq.mod_modeq _ _)
end int
|
64877b9b57fbfefb42a24f071d682c50b4b47c98 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/category_theory/abelian/pseudoelements.lean | f0c1701b3fc9fdf7e261cb3f36d1714138d455f5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,141 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import category_theory.abelian.exact
import category_theory.over
import algebra.category.Module.epi_mono
/-!
# Pseudoelements in abelian categories
A *pseudoelement* of an object `X` in an abelian category `C` is an equivalence class of arrows
ending in `X`, where two arrows are considered equivalent if we can find two epimorphisms with a
common domain making a commutative square with the two arrows. While the construction shows that
pseudoelements are actually subobjects of `X` rather than "elements", it is possible to chase these
pseudoelements through commutative diagrams in an abelian category to prove exactness properties.
This is done using some "diagram-chasing metatheorems" proved in this file. In many cases, a proof
in the category of abelian groups can more or less directly be converted into a proof using
pseudoelements.
A classic application of pseudoelements are diagram lemmas like the four lemma or the snake lemma.
Pseudoelements are in some ways weaker than actual elements in a concrete category. The most
important limitation is that there is no extensionality principle: If `f g : X ⟶ Y`, then
`∀ x ∈ X, f x = g x` does not necessarily imply that `f = g` (however, if `f = 0` or `g = 0`,
it does). A corollary of this is that we can not define arrows in abelian categories by dictating
their action on pseudoelements. Thus, a usual style of proofs in abelian categories is this:
First, we construct some morphism using universal properties, and then we use diagram chasing
of pseudoelements to verify that is has some desirable property such as exactness.
It should be noted that the Freyd-Mitchell embedding theorem gives a vastly stronger notion of
pseudoelement (in particular one that gives extensionality). However, this theorem is quite
difficult to prove and probably out of reach for a formal proof for the time being.
## Main results
We define the type of pseudoelements of an object and, in particular, the zero pseudoelement.
We prove that every morphism maps the zero pseudoelement to the zero pseudoelement (`apply_zero`)
and that a zero morphism maps every pseudoelement to the zero pseudoelement (`zero_apply`)
Here are the metatheorems we provide:
* A morphism `f` is zero if and only if it is the zero function on pseudoelements.
* A morphism `f` is an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective on pseudoelements.
* A morphism `f` is a monomorphism if and only if it is injective on pseudoelements
if and only if `∀ a, f a = 0 → f = 0`.
* A sequence `f, g` of morphisms is exact if and only if
`∀ a, g (f a) = 0` and `∀ b, g b = 0 → ∃ a, f a = b`.
* If `f` is a morphism and `a, a'` are such that `f a = f a'`, then there is some
pseudoelement `a''` such that `f a'' = 0` and for every `g` we have
`g a' = 0 → g a = g a''`. We can think of `a''` as `a - a'`, but don't get too carried away
by that: pseudoelements of an object do not form an abelian group.
## Notations
We introduce coercions from an object of an abelian category to the set of its pseudoelements
and from a morphism to the function it induces on pseudoelements.
These coercions must be explicitly enabled via local instances:
`local attribute [instance] object_to_sort hom_to_fun`
## Implementation notes
It appears that sometimes the coercion from morphisms to functions does not work, i.e.,
writing `g a` raises a "function expected" error. This error can be fixed by writing
`(g : X ⟶ Y) a`.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
open category_theory.abelian
open category_theory.preadditive
universes v u
namespace category_theory.abelian
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
local attribute [instance] over.coe_from_hom
/-- This is just composition of morphisms in `C`. Another way to express this would be
`(over.map f).obj a`, but our definition has nicer definitional properties. -/
def app {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (a : over P) : over Q :=
a.hom ≫ f
@[simp] lemma app_hom {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (a : over P) : (app f a).hom = a.hom ≫ f := rfl
/-- Two arrows `f : X ⟶ P` and `g : Y ⟶ P` are called pseudo-equal if there is some object
`R` and epimorphisms `p : R ⟶ X` and `q : R ⟶ Y` such that `p ≫ f = q ≫ g`. -/
def pseudo_equal (P : C) (f g : over P) : Prop :=
∃ (R : C) (p : R ⟶ f.1) (q : R ⟶ g.1) (_ : epi p) (_ : epi q), p ≫ f.hom = q ≫ g.hom
lemma pseudo_equal_refl {P : C} : reflexive (pseudo_equal P) :=
λ f, ⟨f.1, 𝟙 f.1, 𝟙 f.1, by apply_instance, by apply_instance, by simp⟩
lemma pseudo_equal_symm {P : C} : symmetric (pseudo_equal P) :=
λ f g ⟨R, p, q, ep, eq, comm⟩, ⟨R, q, p, eq, ep, comm.symm⟩
variables [abelian.{v} C]
section
/-- Pseudoequality is transitive: Just take the pullback. The pullback morphisms will
be epimorphisms since in an abelian category, pullbacks of epimorphisms are epimorphisms. -/
lemma pseudo_equal_trans {P : C} : transitive (pseudo_equal P) :=
λ f g h ⟨R, p, q, ep, eq, comm⟩ ⟨R', p', q', ep', eq', comm'⟩,
begin
refine ⟨pullback q p', pullback.fst ≫ p, pullback.snd ≫ q', _, _, _⟩,
{ resetI, exact epi_comp _ _ },
{ resetI, exact epi_comp _ _ },
{ rw [category.assoc, comm, ←category.assoc, pullback.condition,
category.assoc, comm', category.assoc] }
end
end
/-- The arrows with codomain `P` equipped with the equivalence relation of being pseudo-equal. -/
def pseudoelement.setoid (P : C) : setoid (over P) :=
⟨_, ⟨pseudo_equal_refl, pseudo_equal_symm, pseudo_equal_trans⟩⟩
local attribute [instance] pseudoelement.setoid
/-- A `pseudoelement` of `P` is just an equivalence class of arrows ending in `P` by being
pseudo-equal. -/
def pseudoelement (P : C) : Type (max u v) := quotient (pseudoelement.setoid P)
namespace pseudoelement
/-- A coercion from an object of an abelian category to its pseudoelements. -/
def object_to_sort : has_coe_to_sort C (Type (max u v)) :=
⟨λ P, pseudoelement P⟩
local attribute [instance] object_to_sort
localized "attribute [instance] category_theory.abelian.pseudoelement.object_to_sort"
in pseudoelement
/-- A coercion from an arrow with codomain `P` to its associated pseudoelement. -/
def over_to_sort {P : C} : has_coe (over P) (pseudoelement P) :=
⟨quot.mk (pseudo_equal P)⟩
local attribute [instance] over_to_sort
lemma over_coe_def {P Q : C} (a : Q ⟶ P) : (a : pseudoelement P) = ⟦a⟧ := rfl
/-- If two elements are pseudo-equal, then their composition with a morphism is, too. -/
lemma pseudo_apply_aux {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (a b : over P) :
a ≈ b → app f a ≈ app f b :=
λ ⟨R, p, q, ep, eq, comm⟩,
⟨R, p, q, ep, eq, show p ≫ a.hom ≫ f = q ≫ b.hom ≫ f, by rw reassoc_of comm⟩
/-- A morphism `f` induces a function `pseudo_apply f` on pseudoelements. -/
def pseudo_apply {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : P → Q :=
quotient.map (λ (g : over P), app f g) (pseudo_apply_aux f)
/-- A coercion from morphisms to functions on pseudoelements -/
def hom_to_fun {P Q : C} : has_coe_to_fun (P ⟶ Q) (λ _, P → Q) := ⟨pseudo_apply⟩
local attribute [instance] hom_to_fun
localized "attribute [instance] category_theory.abelian.pseudoelement.hom_to_fun" in pseudoelement
lemma pseudo_apply_mk {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (a : over P) : f ⟦a⟧ = ⟦a.hom ≫ f⟧ :=
rfl
/-- Applying a pseudoelement to a composition of morphisms is the same as composing
with each morphism. Sadly, this is not a definitional equality, but at least it is
true. -/
theorem comp_apply {P Q R : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) (a : P) : (f ≫ g) a = g (f a) :=
quotient.induction_on a $ λ x, quotient.sound $
by { unfold app, rw [←category.assoc, over.coe_hom] }
/-- Composition of functions on pseudoelements is composition of morphisms. -/
theorem comp_comp {P Q R : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) : g ∘ f = f ≫ g :=
funext $ λ x, (comp_apply _ _ _).symm
section zero
/-!
In this section we prove that for every `P` there is an equivalence class that contains
precisely all the zero morphisms ending in `P` and use this to define *the* zero
pseudoelement.
-/
section
local attribute [instance] has_binary_biproducts.of_has_binary_products
/-- The arrows pseudo-equal to a zero morphism are precisely the zero morphisms -/
lemma pseudo_zero_aux {P : C} (Q : C) (f : over P) : f ≈ (0 : Q ⟶ P) ↔ f.hom = 0 :=
⟨λ ⟨R, p, q, ep, eq, comm⟩, by exactI zero_of_epi_comp p (by simp [comm]),
λ hf, ⟨biprod f.1 Q, biprod.fst, biprod.snd, by apply_instance, by apply_instance,
by rw [hf, over.coe_hom, has_zero_morphisms.comp_zero, has_zero_morphisms.comp_zero]⟩⟩
end
lemma zero_eq_zero' {P Q R : C} :
⟦((0 : Q ⟶ P) : over P)⟧ = ⟦((0 : R ⟶ P) : over P)⟧ :=
quotient.sound $ (pseudo_zero_aux R _).2 rfl
/-- The zero pseudoelement is the class of a zero morphism -/
def pseudo_zero {P : C} : P := ⟦(0 : P ⟶ P)⟧
/--
We can not use `pseudo_zero` as a global `has_zero` instance,
as it would trigger on any type class search for `has_zero` applied to a `coe_sort`.
This would be too expensive.
-/
def has_zero {P : C} : has_zero P := ⟨pseudo_zero⟩
localized "attribute [instance] category_theory.abelian.pseudoelement.has_zero" in pseudoelement
instance {P : C} : inhabited (pseudoelement P) := ⟨0⟩
lemma pseudo_zero_def {P : C} : (0 : pseudoelement P) = ⟦(0 : P ⟶ P)⟧ := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_zero {P Q : C} : ⟦((0 : Q ⟶ P) : over P)⟧ = (0 : pseudoelement P) :=
zero_eq_zero'
/-- The pseudoelement induced by an arrow is zero precisely when that arrow is zero -/
lemma pseudo_zero_iff {P : C} (a : over P) : (a : P) = 0 ↔ a.hom = 0 :=
by { rw ←pseudo_zero_aux P a, exact quotient.eq }
end zero
open_locale pseudoelement
/-- Morphisms map the zero pseudoelement to the zero pseudoelement -/
@[simp] theorem apply_zero {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : f 0 = 0 :=
by { rw [pseudo_zero_def, pseudo_apply_mk], simp }
/-- The zero morphism maps every pseudoelement to 0. -/
@[simp] theorem zero_apply {P : C} (Q : C) (a : P) : (0 : P ⟶ Q) a = 0 :=
quotient.induction_on a $ λ a',
by { rw [pseudo_zero_def, pseudo_apply_mk], simp }
/-- An extensionality lemma for being the zero arrow. -/
theorem zero_morphism_ext {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : (∀ a, f a = 0) → f = 0 :=
λ h, by { rw ←category.id_comp f, exact (pseudo_zero_iff ((𝟙 P ≫ f) : over Q)).1 (h (𝟙 P)) }
theorem zero_morphism_ext' {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : (∀ a, f a = 0) → 0 = f :=
eq.symm ∘ zero_morphism_ext f
localized "attribute [ext] category_theory.abelian.pseudoelement.zero_morphism_ext
category_theory.abelian.pseudoelement.zero_morphism_ext'" in pseudoelement
theorem eq_zero_iff {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : f = 0 ↔ ∀ a, f a = 0 :=
⟨λ h a, by simp [h], zero_morphism_ext _⟩
/-- A monomorphism is injective on pseudoelements. -/
theorem pseudo_injective_of_mono {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) [mono f] : function.injective f :=
λ abar abar', quotient.induction_on₂ abar abar' $ λ a a' ha, quotient.sound $
have ⟦(a.hom ≫ f : over Q)⟧ = ⟦a'.hom ≫ f⟧, by convert ha,
match quotient.exact this with ⟨R, p, q, ep, eq, comm⟩ :=
⟨R, p, q, ep, eq, (cancel_mono f).1 $ by { simp only [category.assoc], exact comm }⟩
end
/-- A morphism that is injective on pseudoelements only maps the zero element to zero. -/
lemma zero_of_map_zero {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : function.injective f → ∀ a, f a = 0 → a = 0 :=
λ h a ha, by { rw ←apply_zero f at ha, exact h ha }
/-- A morphism that only maps the zero pseudoelement to zero is a monomorphism. -/
theorem mono_of_zero_of_map_zero {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : (∀ a, f a = 0 → a = 0) → mono f :=
λ h, (mono_iff_cancel_zero _).2 $ λ R g hg, (pseudo_zero_iff (g : over P)).1 $ h _ $
show f g = 0, from (pseudo_zero_iff (g ≫ f : over Q)).2 hg
section
/-- An epimorphism is surjective on pseudoelements. -/
theorem pseudo_surjective_of_epi {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) [epi f] : function.surjective f :=
λ qbar, quotient.induction_on qbar $ λ q, ⟨((pullback.fst : pullback f q.hom ⟶ P) : over P),
quotient.sound $ ⟨pullback f q.hom, 𝟙 (pullback f q.hom), pullback.snd, by apply_instance,
by apply_instance, by rw [category.id_comp, ←pullback.condition, app_hom, over.coe_hom]⟩⟩
end
/-- A morphism that is surjective on pseudoelements is an epimorphism. -/
theorem epi_of_pseudo_surjective {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : function.surjective f → epi f :=
λ h, match h (𝟙 Q) with ⟨pbar, hpbar⟩ :=
match quotient.exists_rep pbar with ⟨p, hp⟩ :=
have ⟦(p.hom ≫ f : over Q)⟧ = ⟦𝟙 Q⟧, by { rw ←hp at hpbar, exact hpbar },
match quotient.exact this with ⟨R, x, y, ex, ey, comm⟩ :=
@epi_of_epi_fac _ _ _ _ _ (x ≫ p.hom) f y ey $
by { dsimp at comm, rw [category.assoc, comm], apply category.comp_id }
end
end
end
section
/-- Two morphisms in an exact sequence are exact on pseudoelements. -/
theorem pseudo_exact_of_exact {P Q R : C} {f : P ⟶ Q} {g : Q ⟶ R} (h : exact f g) :
(∀ a, g (f a) = 0) ∧ (∀ b, g b = 0 → ∃ a, f a = b) :=
⟨λ a, by { rw [←comp_apply, h.w], exact zero_apply _ _ },
λ b', quotient.induction_on b' $ λ b hb,
have hb' : b.hom ≫ g = 0, from (pseudo_zero_iff _).1 hb,
begin
-- By exactness, b factors through im f = ker g via some c
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := kernel_fork.is_limit.lift' (is_limit_image f g h) _ hb',
-- We compute the pullback of the map into the image and c.
-- The pseudoelement induced by the first pullback map will be our preimage.
use (pullback.fst : pullback (abelian.factor_thru_image f) c ⟶ P),
-- It remains to show that the image of this element under f is pseudo-equal to b.
apply quotient.sound,
-- pullback.snd is an epimorphism because the map onto the image is!
refine ⟨pullback (abelian.factor_thru_image f) c, 𝟙 _, pullback.snd,
by apply_instance, by apply_instance, _⟩,
-- Now we can verify that the diagram commutes.
calc 𝟙 (pullback (abelian.factor_thru_image f) c) ≫ pullback.fst ≫ f = pullback.fst ≫ f
: category.id_comp _
... = pullback.fst ≫ abelian.factor_thru_image f ≫ kernel.ι (cokernel.π f)
: by rw abelian.image.fac
... = (pullback.snd ≫ c) ≫ kernel.ι (cokernel.π f)
: by rw [←category.assoc, pullback.condition]
... = pullback.snd ≫ b.hom
: by { rw category.assoc, congr' }
end⟩
end
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_comp_eq_zero {P Q R : C} (f : Q ⟶ R) (a : P ⟶ Q) : a ≫ f = 0 → f a = 0 :=
λ h, by simp [over_coe_def, pseudo_apply_mk, over.coe_hom, h]
section
/-- If two morphisms are exact on pseudoelements, they are exact. -/
theorem exact_of_pseudo_exact {P Q R : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) :
(∀ a, g (f a) = 0) ∧ (∀ b, g b = 0 → ∃ a, f a = b) → exact f g :=
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, (abelian.exact_iff _ _).2 ⟨zero_morphism_ext _ $ λ a, by rw [comp_apply, h₁ a],
begin
-- If we apply g to the pseudoelement induced by its kernel, we get 0 (of course!).
have : g (kernel.ι g) = 0 := apply_eq_zero_of_comp_eq_zero _ _ (kernel.condition _),
-- By pseudo-exactness, we get a preimage.
obtain ⟨a', ha⟩ := h₂ _ this,
obtain ⟨a, ha'⟩ := quotient.exists_rep a',
rw ←ha' at ha,
obtain ⟨Z, r, q, er, eq, comm⟩ := quotient.exact ha,
-- Consider the pullback of kernel.ι (cokernel.π f) and kernel.ι g.
-- The commutative diagram given by the pseudo-equality f a = b induces
-- a cone over this pullback, so we get a factorization z.
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := @pullback.lift' _ _ _ _ _ _ (kernel.ι (cokernel.π f)) (kernel.ι g) _
(r ≫ a.hom ≫ abelian.factor_thru_image f) q
(by { simp only [category.assoc, abelian.image.fac], exact comm }),
-- Let's give a name to the second pullback morphism.
let j : pullback (kernel.ι (cokernel.π f)) (kernel.ι g) ⟶ kernel g := pullback.snd,
-- Since q is an epimorphism, in particular this means that j is an epimorphism.
haveI pe : epi j := by exactI epi_of_epi_fac hz₂,
-- But is is also a monomorphism, because kernel.ι (cokernel.π f) is: A kernel is
-- always a monomorphism and the pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism.
-- But mono + epi = iso, so j is an isomorphism.
haveI : is_iso j := is_iso_of_mono_of_epi _,
-- But then kernel.ι g can be expressed using all of the maps of the pullback square, and we
-- are done.
rw (iso.eq_inv_comp (as_iso j)).2 pullback.condition.symm,
simp only [category.assoc, kernel.condition, has_zero_morphisms.comp_zero]
end⟩
end
/-- If two pseudoelements `x` and `y` have the same image under some morphism `f`, then we can form
their "difference" `z`. This pseudoelement has the properties that `f z = 0` and for all
morphisms `g`, if `g y = 0` then `g z = g x`. -/
theorem sub_of_eq_image {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (x y : P) : f x = f y →
∃ z, f z = 0 ∧ ∀ (R : C) (g : P ⟶ R), (g : P ⟶ R) y = 0 → g z = g x :=
quotient.induction_on₂ x y $ λ a a' h,
match quotient.exact h with ⟨R, p, q, ep, eq, comm⟩ :=
let a'' : R ⟶ P := p ≫ a.hom - q ≫ a'.hom in ⟨a'',
⟨show ⟦((p ≫ a.hom - q ≫ a'.hom) ≫ f : over Q)⟧ = ⟦(0 : Q ⟶ Q)⟧,
by { dsimp at comm, simp [sub_eq_zero.2 comm] },
λ Z g hh,
begin
obtain ⟨X, p', q', ep', eq', comm'⟩ := quotient.exact hh,
have : a'.hom ≫ g = 0,
{ apply (epi_iff_cancel_zero _).1 ep' _ (a'.hom ≫ g),
simpa using comm' },
apply quotient.sound,
-- Can we prevent quotient.sound from giving us this weird `coe_b` thingy?
change app g (a'' : over P) ≈ app g a,
exact ⟨R, 𝟙 R, p, by apply_instance, ep, by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this]⟩
end⟩⟩
end
variable [limits.has_pullbacks C]
/-- If `f : P ⟶ R` and `g : Q ⟶ R` are morphisms and `p : P` and `q : Q` are pseudoelements such
that `f p = g q`, then there is some `s : pullback f g` such that `fst s = p` and `snd s = q`.
Remark: Borceux claims that `s` is unique, but this is false. See
`counterexamples/pseudoelement` for details. -/
theorem pseudo_pullback {P Q R : C} {f : P ⟶ R} {g : Q ⟶ R} {p : P} {q : Q} : f p = g q →
∃ s, (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ P) s = p ∧ (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Q) s = q :=
quotient.induction_on₂ p q $ λ x y h,
begin
obtain ⟨Z, a, b, ea, eb, comm⟩ := quotient.exact h,
obtain ⟨l, hl₁, hl₂⟩ := @pullback.lift' _ _ _ _ _ _ f g _ (a ≫ x.hom) (b ≫ y.hom)
(by { simp only [category.assoc], exact comm }),
exact ⟨l, ⟨quotient.sound ⟨Z, 𝟙 Z, a, by apply_instance, ea, by rwa category.id_comp⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨Z, 𝟙 Z, b, by apply_instance, eb, by rwa category.id_comp⟩⟩⟩
end
section module
local attribute [-instance] hom_to_fun
/-- In the category `Module R`, if `x` and `y` are pseudoequal, then the range of the associated
morphisms is the same. -/
lemma Module.eq_range_of_pseudoequal {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] {G : Module R} {x y : over G}
(h : pseudo_equal G x y) : x.hom.range = y.hom.range :=
begin
obtain ⟨P, p, q, hp, hq, H⟩ := h,
refine submodule.ext (λ a, ⟨λ ha, _, λ ha, _⟩),
{ obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := ha,
obtain ⟨a'', ha''⟩ := (Module.epi_iff_surjective p).1 hp a',
refine ⟨q a'', _⟩,
rw [← linear_map.comp_apply, ← Module.comp_def, ← H, Module.comp_def, linear_map.comp_apply,
ha'', ha'] },
{ obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := ha,
obtain ⟨a'', ha''⟩ := (Module.epi_iff_surjective q).1 hq a',
refine ⟨p a'', _⟩,
rw [← linear_map.comp_apply, ← Module.comp_def, H, Module.comp_def, linear_map.comp_apply,
ha'', ha'] }
end
end module
end pseudoelement
end category_theory.abelian
|
b9a0ebe0294c99570d8f399666d782ac503bf165 | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /examples/lean/opaque_pairs.lean | 485a82991da0d30794b11abf028ae34a53b494c1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,335 | lean | import macros tactic
variable Sigma {A : (Type 1)} (B : A → (Type 1)) : (Type 1)
variable Pair {A : (Type 1)} {B : A → (Type 1)} (a : A) (b : B a) : Sigma B
variable Fst {A : (Type 1)} {B : A → (Type 1)} (p : Sigma B) : A
variable Snd {A : (Type 1)} {B : A → (Type 1)} (p : Sigma B) : B (Fst p)
axiom FstAx {A : (Type 1)} {B : A → (Type 1)} (a : A) (b : B a) : @Fst A B (Pair a b) = a
axiom SndAx {A : (Type 1)} {B : A → (Type 1)} (a : A) (b : B a) : @Snd A B (Pair a b) == b
scope
-- Remark: A1 a1 A2 a2 A3 a3 A3 a4 are parameters for the definitions and theorems in this scope.
variable A1 : (Type 1)
variable a1 : A1
variable A2 : A1 → (Type 1)
variable a2 : A2 a1
variable A3 : ∀ a1 : A1, A2 a1 → (Type 1)
variable a3 : A3 a1 a2
variable A4 : ∀ (a1 : A1) (a2 : A2 a1), A3 a1 a2 → (Type 1)
variable a4 : A4 a1 a2 a3
-- Pair type parameterized by a1 and a2
definition A1A2_tuple_ty (a1 : A1) (a2 : A2 a1) : (Type 1)
:= @Sigma (A3 a1 a2) (A4 a1 a2)
-- Pair a3 a4
definition tuple_34 : A1A2_tuple_ty a1 a2
:= @Pair (A3 a1 a2) (A4 a1 a2) a3 a4
-- Triple type parameterized by a1 a2 a3
definition A1_tuple_ty (a1 : A1) : (Type 1)
:= @Sigma (A2 a1) (A1A2_tuple_ty a1)
-- Triple a2 a3 a4
definition tuple_234 : A1_tuple_ty a1
:= @Pair (A2 a1) (A1A2_tuple_ty a1) a2 tuple_34
-- Quadruple type
definition tuple_ty : (Type 1)
:= @Sigma A1 A1_tuple_ty
-- Quadruple a1 a2 a3 a4
definition tuple_1234 : tuple_ty
:= @Pair A1 A1_tuple_ty a1 tuple_234
-- First element of the quadruple
definition f_1234 : A1
:= @Fst A1 A1_tuple_ty tuple_1234
-- Rest of the quadruple (i.e., a triple)
definition s_1234 : A1_tuple_ty f_1234
:= @Snd A1 A1_tuple_ty tuple_1234
theorem H_eq_a1 : f_1234 = a1
:= @FstAx A1 A1_tuple_ty a1 tuple_234
theorem H_eq_triple : s_1234 == tuple_234
:= @SndAx A1 A1_tuple_ty a1 tuple_234
-- Second element of the quadruple
definition fs_1234 : A2 f_1234
:= @Fst (A2 f_1234) (A1A2_tuple_ty f_1234) s_1234
-- Rest of the triple (i.e., a pair)
definition ss_1234 : A1A2_tuple_ty f_1234 fs_1234
:= @Snd (A2 f_1234) (A1A2_tuple_ty f_1234) s_1234
theorem H_eq_a2 : fs_1234 == a2
:= have H1 : @Fst (A2 f_1234) (A1A2_tuple_ty f_1234) s_1234 == @Fst (A2 a1) (A1A2_tuple_ty a1) tuple_234,
from hcongr (hcongr (hrefl (λ x, @Fst (A2 x) (A1A2_tuple_ty x))) (to_heq H_eq_a1)) H_eq_triple,
have H2 : @Fst (A2 a1) (A1A2_tuple_ty a1) tuple_234 = a2,
from FstAx _ _,
htrans H1 (to_heq H2)
theorem H_eq_pair : ss_1234 == tuple_34
:= have H1 : @Snd (A2 f_1234) (A1A2_tuple_ty f_1234) s_1234 == @Snd (A2 a1) (A1A2_tuple_ty a1) tuple_234,
from hcongr (hcongr (hrefl (λ x, @Snd (A2 x) (A1A2_tuple_ty x))) (to_heq H_eq_a1)) H_eq_triple,
have H2 : @Snd (A2 a1) (A1A2_tuple_ty a1) tuple_234 == tuple_34,
from SndAx _ _,
htrans H1 H2
-- Third element of the quadruple
definition fss_1234 : A3 f_1234 fs_1234
:= @Fst (A3 f_1234 fs_1234) (A4 f_1234 fs_1234) ss_1234
-- Fourth element of the quadruple
definition sss_1234 : A4 f_1234 fs_1234 fss_1234
:= @Snd (A3 f_1234 fs_1234) (A4 f_1234 fs_1234) ss_1234
theorem H_eq_a3 : fss_1234 == a3
:= have H1 : @Fst (A3 f_1234 fs_1234) (A4 f_1234 fs_1234) ss_1234 == @Fst (A3 a1 a2) (A4 a1 a2) tuple_34,
from hcongr (hcongr (hcongr (hrefl (λ x y z, @Fst (A3 x y) (A4 x y) z)) (to_heq H_eq_a1)) H_eq_a2) H_eq_pair,
have H2 : @Fst (A3 a1 a2) (A4 a1 a2) tuple_34 = a3,
from FstAx _ _,
htrans H1 (to_heq H2)
theorem H_eq_a4 : sss_1234 == a4
:= have H1 : @Snd (A3 f_1234 fs_1234) (A4 f_1234 fs_1234) ss_1234 == @Snd (A3 a1 a2) (A4 a1 a2) tuple_34,
from hcongr (hcongr (hcongr (hrefl (λ x y z, @Snd (A3 x y) (A4 x y) z)) (to_heq H_eq_a1)) H_eq_a2) H_eq_pair,
have H2 : @Snd (A3 a1 a2) (A4 a1 a2) tuple_34 == a4,
from SndAx _ _,
htrans H1 H2
eval tuple_1234
eval f_1234
eval fs_1234
eval fss_1234
eval sss_1234
check H_eq_a1
check H_eq_a2
check H_eq_a3
check H_eq_a4
theorem f_quadruple : Fst (Pair a1 (Pair a2 (Pair a3 a4))) = a1
:= H_eq_a1
theorem fs_quadruple : Fst (Snd (Pair a1 (Pair a2 (Pair a3 a4)))) == a2
:= H_eq_a2
theorem fss_quadruple : Fst (Snd (Snd (Pair a1 (Pair a2 (Pair a3 a4))))) == a3
:= H_eq_a3
theorem sss_quadruple : Snd (Snd (Snd (Pair a1 (Pair a2 (Pair a3 a4))))) == a4
:= H_eq_a4
end
-- Show the theorems with their parameters
check f_quadruple
check fs_quadruple
check fss_quadruple
check sss_quadruple
exit
|
340263ea1c54daf5804ae5ab7577498c0c09a97c | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/category_theory/monad/limits.lean | fe9acefab8e64bb954c402befd2449aaa1897fad | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,219 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.monad.adjunction
import category_theory.adjunction.limits
import category_theory.limits.preserves.shapes.terminal
/-!
# Limits and colimits in the category of algebras
This file shows that the forgetful functor `forget T : algebra T ⥤ C` for a monad `T : C ⥤ C`
creates limits and creates any colimits which `T` preserves.
This is used to show that `algebra T` has any limits which `C` has, and any colimits which `C` has
and `T` preserves.
This is generalised to the case of a monadic functor `D ⥤ C`.
## TODO
Dualise for the category of coalgebras and comonadic left adjoints.
-/
namespace category_theory
open category
open category_theory.limits
universes v u v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [category_theory universes].
namespace monad
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
variables {T : monad C}
variables {J : Type u} [category.{v} J]
namespace forget_creates_limits
variables (D : J ⥤ algebra T) (c : cone (D ⋙ T.forget)) (t : is_limit c)
/-- (Impl) The natural transformation used to define the new cone -/
@[simps] def γ : (D ⋙ T.forget ⋙ ↑T) ⟶ D ⋙ T.forget := { app := λ j, (D.obj j).a }
/-- (Impl) This new cone is used to construct the algebra structure -/
@[simps π_app] def new_cone : cone (D ⋙ forget T) :=
{ X := T.obj c.X,
π := (functor.const_comp _ _ ↑T).inv ≫ whisker_right c.π T ≫ γ D }
/-- The algebra structure which will be the apex of the new limit cone for `D`. -/
@[simps] def cone_point : algebra T :=
{ A := c.X,
a := t.lift (new_cone D c),
unit' := t.hom_ext $ λ j,
begin
rw [category.assoc, t.fac, new_cone_π_app, ←T.η.naturality_assoc, functor.id_map,
(D.obj j).unit],
dsimp, simp -- See library note [dsimp, simp]
end,
assoc' := t.hom_ext $ λ j,
begin
rw [category.assoc, category.assoc, t.fac (new_cone D c), new_cone_π_app,
←functor.map_comp_assoc, t.fac (new_cone D c), new_cone_π_app, ←T.μ.naturality_assoc,
(D.obj j).assoc, functor.map_comp, category.assoc],
refl,
end }
/-- (Impl) Construct the lifted cone in `algebra T` which will be limiting. -/
@[simps] def lifted_cone : cone D :=
{ X := cone_point D c t,
π := { app := λ j, { f := c.π.app j },
naturality' := λ X Y f, by { ext1, dsimp, erw c.w f, simp } } }
/-- (Impl) Prove that the lifted cone is limiting. -/
@[simps]
def lifted_cone_is_limit : is_limit (lifted_cone D c t) :=
{ lift := λ s,
{ f := t.lift ((forget T).map_cone s),
h' := t.hom_ext $ λ j,
begin
dsimp,
rw [category.assoc, category.assoc, t.fac, new_cone_π_app, ←functor.map_comp_assoc, t.fac,
functor.map_cone_π_app],
apply (s.π.app j).h,
end },
uniq' := λ s m J,
begin
ext1,
apply t.hom_ext,
intro j,
simpa [t.fac ((forget T).map_cone s) j] using congr_arg algebra.hom.f (J j),
end }
end forget_creates_limits
-- Theorem 5.6.5 from [Riehl][riehl2017]
/-- The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category creates limits. -/
noncomputable
instance forget_creates_limits : creates_limits_of_size (forget T) :=
{ creates_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ creates_limit := λ D,
creates_limit_of_reflects_iso (λ c t,
{ lifted_cone := forget_creates_limits.lifted_cone D c t,
valid_lift := cones.ext (iso.refl _) (λ j, (id_comp _).symm),
makes_limit := forget_creates_limits.lifted_cone_is_limit _ _ _ } ) } }
/-- `D ⋙ forget T` has a limit, then `D` has a limit. -/
lemma has_limit_of_comp_forget_has_limit (D : J ⥤ algebra T) [has_limit (D ⋙ forget T)] :
has_limit D :=
has_limit_of_created D (forget T)
namespace forget_creates_colimits
-- Let's hide the implementation details in a namespace
variables {D : J ⥤ algebra T} (c : cocone (D ⋙ forget T)) (t : is_colimit c)
-- We have a diagram D of shape J in the category of algebras, and we assume that we are given a
-- colimit for its image D ⋙ forget T under the forgetful functor, say its apex is L.
-- We'll construct a colimiting coalgebra for D, whose carrier will also be L.
-- To do this, we must find a map TL ⟶ L. Since T preserves colimits, TL is also a colimit.
-- In particular, it is a colimit for the diagram `(D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ T`
-- so to construct a map TL ⟶ L it suffices to show that L is the apex of a cocone for this diagram.
-- In other words, we need a natural transformation from const L to `(D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ T`.
-- But we already know that L is the apex of a cocone for the diagram `D ⋙ forget T`, so it
-- suffices to give a natural transformation `((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ T) ⟶ (D ⋙ forget T)`:
/--
(Impl)
The natural transformation given by the algebra structure maps, used to construct a cocone `c` with
apex `colimit (D ⋙ forget T)`.
-/
@[simps] def γ : ((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ ↑T) ⟶ (D ⋙ forget T) := { app := λ j, (D.obj j).a }
/--
(Impl)
A cocone for the diagram `(D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ T` found by composing the natural transformation `γ`
with the colimiting cocone for `D ⋙ forget T`.
-/
@[simps]
def new_cocone : cocone ((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ ↑T) :=
{ X := c.X,
ι := γ ≫ c.ι }
variables [preserves_colimit (D ⋙ forget T) (T : C ⥤ C)]
/--
(Impl)
Define the map `λ : TL ⟶ L`, which will serve as the structure of the coalgebra on `L`, and
we will show is the colimiting object. We use the cocone constructed by `c` and the fact that
`T` preserves colimits to produce this morphism.
-/
@[reducible]
def lambda : ((T : C ⥤ C).map_cocone c).X ⟶ c.X :=
(is_colimit_of_preserves _ t).desc (new_cocone c)
/-- (Impl) The key property defining the map `λ : TL ⟶ L`. -/
lemma commuting (j : J) :
(T : C ⥤ C).map (c.ι.app j) ≫ lambda c t = (D.obj j).a ≫ c.ι.app j :=
(is_colimit_of_preserves _ t).fac (new_cocone c) j
variables [preserves_colimit ((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ ↑T) (T : C ⥤ C)]
/--
(Impl)
Construct the colimiting algebra from the map `λ : TL ⟶ L` given by `lambda`. We are required to
show it satisfies the two algebra laws, which follow from the algebra laws for the image of `D` and
our `commuting` lemma.
-/
@[simps] def cocone_point :
algebra T :=
{ A := c.X,
a := lambda c t,
unit' :=
begin
apply t.hom_ext,
intro j,
rw [(show c.ι.app j ≫ T.η.app c.X ≫ _ = T.η.app (D.obj j).A ≫ _ ≫ _,
from T.η.naturality_assoc _ _), commuting, algebra.unit_assoc (D.obj j)],
dsimp, simp -- See library note [dsimp, simp]
end,
assoc' :=
begin
refine (is_colimit_of_preserves _ (is_colimit_of_preserves _ t)).hom_ext (λ j, _),
rw [functor.map_cocone_ι_app, functor.map_cocone_ι_app,
(show (T : C ⥤ C).map ((T : C ⥤ C).map _) ≫ _ ≫ _ = _, from T.μ.naturality_assoc _ _),
←functor.map_comp_assoc, commuting, functor.map_comp, category.assoc, commuting],
apply (D.obj j).assoc_assoc _,
end }
/-- (Impl) Construct the lifted cocone in `algebra T` which will be colimiting. -/
@[simps] def lifted_cocone : cocone D :=
{ X := cocone_point c t,
ι := { app := λ j, { f := c.ι.app j, h' := commuting _ _ _ },
naturality' := λ A B f, by { ext1, dsimp, rw [comp_id], apply c.w } } }
/-- (Impl) Prove that the lifted cocone is colimiting. -/
@[simps]
def lifted_cocone_is_colimit : is_colimit (lifted_cocone c t) :=
{ desc := λ s,
{ f := t.desc ((forget T).map_cocone s),
h' := (is_colimit_of_preserves (T : C ⥤ C) t).hom_ext $ λ j,
begin
dsimp,
rw [←functor.map_comp_assoc, ←category.assoc, t.fac, commuting, category.assoc, t.fac],
apply algebra.hom.h,
end },
uniq' := λ s m J,
by { ext1, apply t.hom_ext, intro j, simpa using congr_arg algebra.hom.f (J j) } }
end forget_creates_colimits
open forget_creates_colimits
-- TODO: the converse of this is true as well
/--
The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category for a monad creates any colimit
which the monad itself preserves.
-/
noncomputable
instance forget_creates_colimit (D : J ⥤ algebra T)
[preserves_colimit (D ⋙ forget T) (T : C ⥤ C)]
[preserves_colimit ((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ ↑T) (T : C ⥤ C)] :
creates_colimit D (forget T) :=
creates_colimit_of_reflects_iso $ λ c t,
{ lifted_cocone :=
{ X := cocone_point c t,
ι :=
{ app := λ j, { f := c.ι.app j, h' := commuting _ _ _ },
naturality' := λ A B f, by { ext1, dsimp, erw [comp_id, c.w] } } },
valid_lift := cocones.ext (iso.refl _) (by tidy),
makes_colimit := lifted_cocone_is_colimit _ _ }
noncomputable
instance forget_creates_colimits_of_shape
[preserves_colimits_of_shape J (T : C ⥤ C)] :
creates_colimits_of_shape J (forget T) :=
{ creates_colimit := λ K, by apply_instance }
noncomputable
instance forget_creates_colimits
[preserves_colimits_of_size.{v u} (T : C ⥤ C)] :
creates_colimits_of_size.{v u} (forget T) :=
{ creates_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥₁, by apply_instance }
/--
For `D : J ⥤ algebra T`, `D ⋙ forget T` has a colimit, then `D` has a colimit provided colimits
of shape `J` are preserved by `T`.
-/
lemma forget_creates_colimits_of_monad_preserves
[preserves_colimits_of_shape J (T : C ⥤ C)] (D : J ⥤ algebra T) [has_colimit (D ⋙ forget T)] :
has_colimit D :=
has_colimit_of_created D (forget T)
end monad
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
variables {J : Type u} [category.{v} J]
instance comp_comparison_forget_has_limit
(F : J ⥤ D) (R : D ⥤ C) [monadic_right_adjoint R] [has_limit (F ⋙ R)] :
has_limit ((F ⋙ monad.comparison (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R)) ⋙ monad.forget _) :=
@has_limit_of_iso _ _ _ _ (F ⋙ R) _ _
(iso_whisker_left F (monad.comparison_forget (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R)).symm)
instance comp_comparison_has_limit
(F : J ⥤ D) (R : D ⥤ C) [monadic_right_adjoint R] [has_limit (F ⋙ R)] :
has_limit (F ⋙ monad.comparison (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R)) :=
monad.has_limit_of_comp_forget_has_limit (F ⋙ monad.comparison (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R))
/-- Any monadic functor creates limits. -/
noncomputable
def monadic_creates_limits (R : D ⥤ C) [monadic_right_adjoint R] :
creates_limits_of_size.{v u} R :=
creates_limits_of_nat_iso (monad.comparison_forget (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R))
/--
The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category for a monad creates any colimit
which the monad itself preserves.
-/
noncomputable
def monadic_creates_colimit_of_preserves_colimit (R : D ⥤ C) (K : J ⥤ D)
[monadic_right_adjoint R]
[preserves_colimit (K ⋙ R) (left_adjoint R ⋙ R)]
[preserves_colimit ((K ⋙ R) ⋙ left_adjoint R ⋙ R) (left_adjoint R ⋙ R)] :
creates_colimit K R :=
begin
apply creates_colimit_of_nat_iso (monad.comparison_forget (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R)),
apply category_theory.comp_creates_colimit _ _,
apply_instance,
let i : ((K ⋙ monad.comparison (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R)) ⋙ monad.forget _) ≅ K ⋙ R :=
functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫
iso_whisker_left K (monad.comparison_forget (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R)),
apply category_theory.monad.forget_creates_colimit _,
{ dsimp,
refine preserves_colimit_of_iso_diagram _ i.symm },
{ dsimp,
refine preserves_colimit_of_iso_diagram _ (iso_whisker_right i (left_adjoint R ⋙ R)).symm },
end
/-- A monadic functor creates any colimits of shapes it preserves. -/
noncomputable
def monadic_creates_colimits_of_shape_of_preserves_colimits_of_shape (R : D ⥤ C)
[monadic_right_adjoint R] [preserves_colimits_of_shape J R] : creates_colimits_of_shape J R :=
begin
have : preserves_colimits_of_shape J (left_adjoint R ⋙ R),
{ apply category_theory.limits.comp_preserves_colimits_of_shape _ _,
apply (adjunction.left_adjoint_preserves_colimits (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R)).1,
apply_instance },
exactI ⟨λ K, monadic_creates_colimit_of_preserves_colimit _ _⟩,
end
/-- A monadic functor creates colimits if it preserves colimits. -/
noncomputable
def monadic_creates_colimits_of_preserves_colimits (R : D ⥤ C) [monadic_right_adjoint R]
[preserves_colimits_of_size.{v u} R] : creates_colimits_of_size.{v u} R :=
{ creates_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥₁,
by exactI monadic_creates_colimits_of_shape_of_preserves_colimits_of_shape _ }
section
lemma has_limit_of_reflective (F : J ⥤ D) (R : D ⥤ C) [has_limit (F ⋙ R)] [reflective R] :
has_limit F :=
by { haveI := monadic_creates_limits.{v u} R, exact has_limit_of_created F R }
/-- If `C` has limits of shape `J` then any reflective subcategory has limits of shape `J`. -/
lemma has_limits_of_shape_of_reflective [has_limits_of_shape J C] (R : D ⥤ C) [reflective R] :
has_limits_of_shape J D :=
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit_of_reflective F R }
/-- If `C` has limits then any reflective subcategory has limits. -/
lemma has_limits_of_reflective (R : D ⥤ C) [has_limits_of_size.{v u} C] [reflective R] :
has_limits_of_size.{v u} D :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥₁, by exactI has_limits_of_shape_of_reflective R }
/-- If `C` has colimits of shape `J` then any reflective subcategory has colimits of shape `J`. -/
lemma has_colimits_of_shape_of_reflective (R : D ⥤ C)
[reflective R] [has_colimits_of_shape J C] : has_colimits_of_shape J D :=
{ has_colimit := λ F,
begin
let c := (left_adjoint R).map_cocone (colimit.cocone (F ⋙ R)),
let h := (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R).left_adjoint_preserves_colimits.1,
letI := @h J _,
let t : is_colimit c := is_colimit_of_preserves (left_adjoint R) (colimit.is_colimit _),
apply has_colimit.mk ⟨_, (is_colimit.precompose_inv_equiv _ _).symm t⟩,
apply (iso_whisker_left F (as_iso (adjunction.of_right_adjoint R).counit) : _) ≪≫ F.right_unitor,
end }
/-- If `C` has colimits then any reflective subcategory has colimits. -/
lemma has_colimits_of_reflective (R : D ⥤ C) [reflective R] [has_colimits_of_size.{v u} C] :
has_colimits_of_size.{v u} D :=
{ has_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI has_colimits_of_shape_of_reflective R }
/--
The reflector always preserves terminal objects. Note this in general doesn't apply to any other
limit.
-/
noncomputable def left_adjoint_preserves_terminal_of_reflective (R : D ⥤ C) [reflective R] :
preserves_limits_of_shape (discrete.{v} pempty) (left_adjoint R) :=
{ preserves_limit := λ K, let F := functor.empty.{v} D in
begin
apply preserves_limit_of_iso_diagram _ (functor.empty_ext (F ⋙ R) _),
fsplit, intros c h, haveI : has_limit (F ⋙ R) := ⟨⟨⟨c,h⟩⟩⟩,
haveI : has_limit F := has_limit_of_reflective F R,
apply is_limit_change_empty_cone D (limit.is_limit F),
apply (as_iso ((adjunction.of_right_adjoint R).counit.app _)).symm.trans,
{ apply (left_adjoint R).map_iso, letI := monadic_creates_limits.{v v} R,
let := (category_theory.preserves_limit_of_creates_limit_and_has_limit F R).preserves,
apply (this (limit.is_limit F)).cone_point_unique_up_to_iso h },
apply_instance,
end }
end
end category_theory
|
0b8613cd59d8afe85882792a491d22ae630ac80c | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/whileRepeat.lean | fa13a1e97d268b39dbcb00b6dd2f2ea5ee287d42 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 310 | lean | def test2 : IO Unit := do
let mut i := 0
repeat
println! "{i}"
i := i + 1
until i >= 10
println! "test2 done {i}"
#eval test2
def test3 : IO Unit := do
let mut i := 0
repeat
println! "{i}"
if i > 10 && i % 3 == 0 then break
i := i + 1
println! "test3 done {i}"
#eval test3
|
bb91029333b6361d1dbf2d057c8a085ac755ca1f | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/order/filter/curry.lean | d0ad3eee57f574d46bd5a9d59477dc3854067e90 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,668 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kevin H. Wilson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin H. Wilson
-/
import order.filter.prod
/-!
# Curried Filters
This file provides an operation (`filter.curry`) on filters which provides the equivalence
`∀ᶠ a in l, ∀ᶠ b in l', p (a, b) ↔ ∀ᶠ c in (l.curry l'), p c` (see `filter.eventually_curry_iff`).
To understand when this operation might arise, it is helpful to think of `∀ᶠ` as a combination of
the quantifiers `∃ ∀`. For instance, `∀ᶠ n in at_top, p n ↔ ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, p n`. A curried filter
yields the quantifier order `∃ ∀ ∃ ∀`. For instance,
`∀ᶠ n in at_top.curry at_top, p n ↔ ∃ M, ∀ m ≥ M, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, p (m, n)`.
This is different from a product filter, which instead yields a quantifier order `∃ ∃ ∀ ∀`. For
instance, `∀ᶠ n in at_top ×ᶠ at_top, p n ↔ ∃ M, ∃ N, ∀ m ≥ M, ∀ n ≥ N, p (m, n)`. This makes it
clear that if something eventually occurs on the product filter, it eventually occurs on the curried
filter (see `filter.curry_le_prod` and `filter.eventually.curry`), but the converse is not true.
Another way to think about the curried versus the product filter is that tending to some limit on
the product filter is a version of uniform convergence (see `tendsto_prod_filter_iff`) whereas
tending to some limit on a curried filter is just iterated limits (see `tendsto.curry`).
## Main definitions
* `filter.curry`: A binary operation on filters which represents iterated limits
## Main statements
* `filter.eventually_curry_iff`: An alternative definition of a curried filter
* `filter.curry_le_prod`: Something that is eventually true on the a product filter is eventually
true on the curried filter
## Tags
uniform convergence, curried filters, product filters
-/
namespace filter
variables {α β γ : Type*}
/-- This filter is characterized by `filter.eventually_curry_iff`:
`(∀ᶠ (x : α × β) in f.curry g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ (x : α) in f, ∀ᶠ (y : β) in g, p (x, y)`. Useful
in adding quantifiers to the middle of `tendsto`s. See
`has_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter`. -/
def curry (f : filter α) (g : filter β) : filter (α × β) :=
{ sets := { s | ∀ᶠ (a : α) in f, ∀ᶠ (b : β) in g, (a, b) ∈ s },
univ_sets := (by simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_univ, eventually_true]),
sets_of_superset := begin
intros x y hx hxy,
simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq] at hx ⊢,
exact hx.mono (λ a ha, ha.mono(λ b hb, set.mem_of_subset_of_mem hxy hb)),
end,
inter_sets := begin
intros x y hx hy,
simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_inter_iff] at hx hy ⊢,
exact (hx.and hy).mono (λ a ha, (ha.1.and ha.2).mono (λ b hb, hb)),
end, }
lemma eventually_curry_iff {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ (x : α × β) in f.curry g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ (x : α) in f, ∀ᶠ (y : β) in g, p (x, y) :=
iff.rfl
lemma curry_le_prod {f : filter α} {g : filter β} :
f.curry g ≤ f.prod g :=
begin
intros u hu,
rw ←eventually_mem_set at hu ⊢,
rw eventually_curry_iff,
exact hu.curry,
end
lemma tendsto.curry {f : α → β → γ} {la : filter α} {lb : filter β} {lc : filter γ} :
(∀ᶠ a in la, tendsto (λ b : β, f a b) lb lc) → tendsto ↿f (la.curry lb) lc :=
begin
intros h,
rw tendsto_def,
simp only [curry, filter.mem_mk, set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_preimage],
simp_rw tendsto_def at h,
refine (λ s hs, h.mono (λ a ha, eventually_iff.mpr _)),
simpa [function.has_uncurry.uncurry, set.preimage] using ha s hs,
end
end filter
|
096a76899e2625231d2dd0b35919b92c9faba0e3 | a7dd8b83f933e72c40845fd168dde330f050b1c9 | /src/analysis/normed_space/deriv.lean | a2e9190bcc92acfee09433dfb94cb8a97c892ca9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | NeilStrickland/mathlib | 10420e92ee5cb7aba1163c9a01dea2f04652ed67 | 3efbd6f6dff0fb9b0946849b43b39948560a1ffe | refs/heads/master | 1,589,043,046,346 | 1,558,938,706,000 | 1,558,938,706,000 | 181,285,984 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,941,848,000 | 1,555,233,833,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 50,490 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel
The Fréchet derivative.
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[k] F` a
bounded k-linear map, where `k` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`has_fderiv_at f f' x := has_fderiv_within_at f f' x univ`
The derivative is defined in terms of the `is_o` relation, but also
characterized in terms of the `tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `differentiable_within_at k f s x` (where `k` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `differentiable_at k f x`,
`differentiable_on k f s` and `differentiable k f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderiv_within k f s x` and `fderiv k f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `unique_diff_within_at s x` and
`unique_diff_on s` express this property, and we prove that indeed they imply the uniqueness of the
derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular for `univ`. This uniqueness
only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very beginning:
otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative, this file contains the
usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps
* bounded bilinear maps
* sum of two functions
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant
* negative of a function
* subtraction of two functions
* bounded bilinear maps
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function
* multiplication of two scalar functions
* composition of functions (the chain rule)
-/
import topology.basic topology.sequences topology.opens
import analysis.normed_space.operator_norm analysis.normed_space.bounded_linear_maps
import analysis.asymptotics
import tactic.abel
open filter asymptotics bounded_linear_map set
noncomputable theory
local attribute [instance, priority 0] classical.decidable_inhabited classical.prop_decidable
section
set_option class.instance_max_depth 60
variables {k : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field k]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_space k E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_space k F]
variables {G : Type*} [normed_space k G]
def has_fderiv_at_filter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[k] F) (x : E) (L : filter E) :=
is_o (λ x', f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) (λ x', x' - x) L
def has_fderiv_within_at (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[k] F) (s : set E) (x : E) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x (nhds_within x s)
def has_fderiv_at (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[k] F) (x : E) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x (nhds x)
variables (k)
def differentiable_within_at (f : E → F) (s : set E) (x : E) :=
∃f' : E →L[k] F, has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x
def differentiable_at (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃f' : E →L[k] F, has_fderiv_at f f' x
def fderiv_within (f : E → F) (s : set E) (x : E) : E →L[k] F :=
if h : ∃f', has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x then classical.some h else 0
def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[k] F :=
if h : ∃f', has_fderiv_at f f' x then classical.some h else 0
def differentiable_on (f : E → F) (s : set E) :=
∀x ∈ s, differentiable_within_at k f s x
def differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀x, differentiable_at k f x
/- A notation for sets on which the differential has to be unique. This is for instance the case
on open sets, which is the main case of applications, but also on closed halfspaces or closed
disks. It is only on such sets that it makes sense to talk about "the" derivative, and to talk
about higher smoothness.
The differential is unique when the tangent directions (called the tangent cone below) spans a
dense subset of the underlying normed space. -/
def tangent_cone_at (s : set E) (x : E) : set E :=
{y : E | ∃(c:ℕ → k) (d: ℕ → E), {n:ℕ | x + d n ∈ s} ∈ (at_top : filter ℕ) ∧
(tendsto (λn, ∥c n∥) at_top at_top) ∧ (tendsto (λn, c n • d n) at_top (nhds y))}
/-- A property ensuring that the tangent cone to `s` at `x` spans a dense subset of the whole space.
The main role of this property is to ensure that the differential within `s` at `x` is unique,
hence this name. The uniqueness it asserts is proved in `unique_diff_within_at.eq` -/
def unique_diff_within_at (s : set E) (x : E) : Prop :=
closure ((submodule.span k (tangent_cone_at k s x)) : set E) = univ
/-- A property ensuring that the tangent cone to `s` at any of its points spans a dense subset of
the whole space. The main role of this property is to ensure that the differential along `s` is
unique, hence this name. The uniqueness it asserts is proved in `unique_diff_on.eq` -/
def unique_diff_on (s : set E) : Prop :=
∀x ∈ s, unique_diff_within_at k s x
variables {k}
variables {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variables {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[k] F}
variables {x : E}
variables {s t : set E}
variables {L L₁ L₂ : filter E}
section derivative_uniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `unique_diff_within_at` and `unique_diff_on` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
lemma tangent_cone_univ : tangent_cone_at k univ x = univ :=
begin
refine univ_subset_iff.1 (λy hy, _),
rcases exists_one_lt_norm k with ⟨w, hw⟩,
refine ⟨λn, w^n, λn, (w^n)⁻¹ • y, univ_mem_sets' (λn, mem_univ _), _, _⟩,
{ simp only [norm_pow],
exact tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_gt_1 hw },
{ convert tendsto_const_nhds,
ext n,
have : w ^ n * (w ^ n)⁻¹ = 1,
{ apply mul_inv_cancel,
apply pow_ne_zero,
simpa [norm_eq_zero] using (ne_of_lt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hw)).symm },
rw [smul_smul, this, one_smul] }
end
lemma tangent_cone_mono (h : s ⊆ t) :
tangent_cone_at k s x ⊆ tangent_cone_at k t x :=
begin
rintros y ⟨c, d, ds, ctop, clim⟩,
exact ⟨c, d, mem_sets_of_superset ds (λn hn, h hn), ctop, clim⟩
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma ensuring that, under the assumptions defining the tangent cone,
the sequence `d` tends to 0 at infinity. -/
lemma tangent_cone_at.lim_zero {y : E} {c : ℕ → k} {d : ℕ → E}
(hc : tendsto (λn, ∥c n∥) at_top at_top) (hd : tendsto (λn, c n • d n) at_top (nhds y)) :
tendsto d at_top (nhds 0) :=
begin
have A : tendsto (λn, ∥c n∥⁻¹) at_top (nhds 0) :=
tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0.comp hc,
have B : tendsto (λn, ∥c n • d n∥) at_top (nhds ∥y∥) :=
(continuous_norm.tendsto _).comp hd,
have C : tendsto (λn, ∥c n∥⁻¹ * ∥c n • d n∥) at_top (nhds (0 * ∥y∥)) :=
tendsto_mul A B,
rw zero_mul at C,
have : {n | ∥c n∥⁻¹ * ∥c n • d n∥ = ∥d n∥} ∈ (@at_top ℕ _),
{ have : {n | 1 ≤ ∥c n∥} ∈ (@at_top ℕ _) :=
hc (mem_at_top 1),
apply mem_sets_of_superset this (λn hn, _),
rw mem_set_of_eq at hn,
rw [mem_set_of_eq, ← norm_inv, ← norm_smul, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul],
simpa [norm_eq_zero] using (ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hn)).symm },
have D : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), ∥d n∥) at_top (nhds 0) :=
tendsto.congr' this C,
rw tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
exact D
end
/-- Intersecting with an open set does not change the tangent cone. -/
lemma tangent_cone_inter_open {x : E} {s t : set E} (xs : x ∈ s) (xt : x ∈ t) (ht : is_open t) :
tangent_cone_at k (s ∩ t) x = tangent_cone_at k s x :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm (tangent_cone_mono (inter_subset_left _ _)) _,
rintros y ⟨c, d, ds, ctop, clim⟩,
refine ⟨c, d, _, ctop, clim⟩,
have : {n : ℕ | x + d n ∈ t} ∈ at_top,
{ have : tendsto (λn, x + d n) at_top (nhds (x + 0)) :=
tendsto_add tendsto_const_nhds (tangent_cone_at.lim_zero ctop clim),
rw add_zero at this,
exact tendsto_nhds.1 this t ht xt },
exact inter_mem_sets ds this
end
/-- `unique_diff_within_at` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem unique_diff_within_at.eq (H : unique_diff_within_at k s x)
(h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (h₁ : has_fderiv_within_at f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
begin
have A : ∀y ∈ tangent_cone_at k s x, f' y = f₁' y,
{ assume y hy,
rcases hy with ⟨c, d, hd, hc, ylim⟩,
have at_top_is_finer : at_top ≤ comap (λ (n : ℕ), x + d n) (nhds_within (x + 0) s),
{ rw [←tendsto_iff_comap, nhds_within, tendsto_inf],
split,
{ apply tendsto_add tendsto_const_nhds (tangent_cone_at.lim_zero hc ylim) },
{ rwa tendsto_principal } },
rw add_zero at at_top_is_finer,
have : is_o (λ y, f₁' (y - x) - f' (y - x)) (λ y, y - x) (nhds_within x s),
by simpa using h.sub h₁,
have : is_o (λ n:ℕ, f₁' ((x + d n) - x) - f' ((x + d n) - x)) (λ n, (x + d n) - x)
((nhds_within x s).comap (λn, x+ d n)) := is_o.comp this _,
have L1 : is_o (λ n:ℕ, f₁' (d n) - f' (d n)) d
((nhds_within x s).comap (λn, x + d n)) := by simpa using this,
have L2 : is_o (λn:ℕ, f₁' (d n) - f' (d n)) d at_top :=
is_o.mono at_top_is_finer L1,
have L3 : is_o (λn:ℕ, c n • (f₁' (d n) - f' (d n))) (λn, c n • d n) at_top :=
is_o_smul L2,
have L4 : is_o (λn:ℕ, c n • (f₁' (d n) - f' (d n))) (λn, (1:ℝ)) at_top :=
L3.trans_is_O (is_O_one_of_tendsto ylim),
have L : tendsto (λn:ℕ, c n • (f₁' (d n) - f' (d n))) at_top (nhds 0) :=
is_o_one_iff.1 L4,
have L' : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), c n • (f₁' (d n) - f' (d n))) at_top (nhds (f₁' y - f' y)),
{ simp only [smul_sub, (bounded_linear_map.map_smul _ _ _).symm],
apply tendsto_sub ((f₁'.continuous.tendsto _).comp ylim) ((f'.continuous.tendsto _).comp ylim) },
have : f₁' y - f' y = 0 := tendsto_nhds_unique (by simp) L' L,
exact (sub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 this).symm },
have B : ∀y ∈ submodule.span k (tangent_cone_at k s x), f' y = f₁' y,
{ assume y hy,
apply submodule.span_induction hy,
{ exact λy hy, A y hy },
{ simp only [bounded_linear_map.map_zero] },
{ simp {contextual := tt} },
{ simp {contextual := tt} } },
have C : ∀y ∈ closure ((submodule.span k (tangent_cone_at k s x)) : set E), f' y = f₁' y,
{ assume y hy,
let K := {y | f' y = f₁' y},
have : (submodule.span k (tangent_cone_at k s x) : set E) ⊆ K := B,
have : closure (submodule.span k (tangent_cone_at k s x) : set E) ⊆ closure K :=
closure_mono this,
have : y ∈ closure K := this hy,
rwa closure_eq_of_is_closed (is_closed_eq f'.continuous f₁'.continuous) at this },
unfold unique_diff_within_at at H,
rw H at C,
ext y,
exact C y (mem_univ _)
end
theorem unique_diff_on.eq (H : unique_diff_on k s) (hx : x ∈ s)
(h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (h₁ : has_fderiv_within_at f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
unique_diff_within_at.eq (H x hx) h h₁
lemma unique_diff_within_univ_at : unique_diff_within_at k univ x :=
by { rw [unique_diff_within_at, tangent_cone_univ], simp }
lemma unique_diff_within_at_inter (xs : x ∈ s) (xt : x ∈ t) (hs : unique_diff_within_at k s x)
(ht : is_open t) : unique_diff_within_at k (s ∩ t) x :=
begin
unfold unique_diff_within_at,
rw tangent_cone_inter_open xs xt ht,
exact hs
end
lemma is_open.unique_diff_within_at (xs : x ∈ s) (hs : is_open s) : unique_diff_within_at k s x :=
begin
have := unique_diff_within_at_inter (mem_univ _) xs unique_diff_within_univ_at hs,
rwa univ_inter at this
end
lemma unique_diff_on_inter (hs : unique_diff_on k s) (ht : is_open t) : unique_diff_on k (s ∩ t) :=
λx hx, unique_diff_within_at_inter hx.1 hx.2 (hs x hx.1) ht
lemma is_open.unique_diff_on (hs : is_open s) : unique_diff_on k s :=
λx hx, is_open.unique_diff_within_at hx hs
end derivative_uniqueness
/- Basic properties of the derivative -/
section fderiv_properties
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥) L (nhds 0) :=
have h : ∀ x', ∥x' - x∥ = 0 → ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥ = 0, from λ x' hx',
by { rw [sub_eq_zero.1 ((norm_eq_zero (x' - x)).1 hx')], simp },
begin
unfold has_fderiv_at_filter,
rw [←is_o_norm_left, ←is_o_norm_right, is_o_iff_tendsto h],
exact tendsto.congr'r (λ _, div_eq_inv_mul),
end
theorem has_fderiv_within_at_iff_tendsto : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥) (nhds_within x s) (nhds 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_fderiv_at_iff_tendsto : has_fderiv_at f f' x ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥) (nhds x) (nhds 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.mono (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L₁ :=
is_o.mono hst h
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.mono (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x :=
h.mono (nhds_within_mono _ hst)
theorem has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_at_filter (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hL : L ≤ nhds x) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
theorem has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_within_at
(h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x :=
h.has_fderiv_at_filter lattice.inf_le_left
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.differentiable_within_at (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
differentiable_within_at k f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
lemma has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) : differentiable_at k f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
lemma differentiable_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at (h : differentiable_within_at k f s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f (fderiv_within k f s x) s x :=
begin
dunfold fderiv_within,
dunfold differentiable_within_at at h,
rw dif_pos h,
exact classical.some_spec h
end
lemma differentiable_at.has_fderiv_at (h : differentiable_at k f x) :
has_fderiv_at f (fderiv k f x) x :=
begin
dunfold fderiv,
dunfold differentiable_at at h,
rw dif_pos h,
exact classical.some_spec h
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.mono {t : set E} (h : s ⊆ t)
(h : differentiable_within_at k f t x) : differentiable_within_at k f s x :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨f', hf'⟩,
exact ⟨f', hf'.mono h⟩
end
lemma differentiable_within_univ_at :
differentiable_within_at k f univ x ↔ differentiable_at k f x :=
begin
unfold differentiable_within_at has_fderiv_within_at,
rw nhds_within_univ,
refl
end
@[simp] lemma has_fderiv_within_univ_at :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' univ x ↔ has_fderiv_at f f' x :=
by { simp only [has_fderiv_within_at, nhds_within_univ], refl }
theorem has_fderiv_at_unique
(h₀ : has_fderiv_at f f₀' x) (h₁ : has_fderiv_at f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' :=
begin
rw ← has_fderiv_within_univ_at at h₀ h₁,
exact unique_diff_within_univ_at.eq h₀ h₁
end
lemma differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at
(h : differentiable_at k f x) : differentiable_within_at k f s x :=
differentiable_within_at.mono (subset_univ _) (differentiable_within_univ_at.2 h)
lemma differentiable_within_at.differentiable_at'
(h : differentiable_within_at k f s x) (hs : s ∈ nhds x) : differentiable_at k f x :=
begin
unfold differentiable_within_at has_fderiv_within_at at h,
have : nhds_within x s = nhds x := lattice.inf_of_le_left (le_principal_iff.2 hs),
rwa this at h,
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.differentiable_at
(h : differentiable_within_at k f s x) (hx : x ∈ s) (hs : is_open s) : differentiable_at k f x :=
h.differentiable_at' (mem_nhds_sets hs hx)
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within {f' : E →L[k] F}
(h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x) :
fderiv_within k f s x = f' :=
by { ext, rw hxs.eq h h.differentiable_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at }
lemma has_fderiv_at.fderiv {f' : E →L[k] F} (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
fderiv k f x = f' :=
by { ext, rw has_fderiv_at_unique h h.differentiable_at.has_fderiv_at }
lemma differentiable.fderiv_within
(h : differentiable_at k f x) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x) :
fderiv_within k f s x = fderiv k f x :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ hxs,
exact h.has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_within_at
end
lemma differentiable_on.mono {f : E → F} {s t : set E}
(h : differentiable_on k f t) (st : s ⊆ t) : differentiable_on k f s :=
λx hx, (h x (st hx)).mono st
lemma differentiable_on_univ :
differentiable_on k f univ ↔ differentiable k f :=
by { simp [differentiable_on, differentiable_within_univ_at], refl }
lemma differentiable.differentiable_on
(h : differentiable k f) : differentiable_on k f s :=
(differentiable_on_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
@[simp] lemma fderiv_within_univ : fderiv_within k f univ = fderiv k f :=
begin
ext x : 1,
by_cases h : differentiable_at k f x,
{ apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ (is_open_univ.unique_diff_within_at (mem_univ _)),
rw has_fderiv_within_univ_at,
apply h.has_fderiv_at },
{ have : fderiv k f x = 0,
by { unfold differentiable_at at h, simp [fderiv, h] },
rw this,
have : ¬(differentiable_within_at k f univ x), by rwa differentiable_within_univ_at,
unfold differentiable_within_at at this,
simp [fderiv_within, this, -has_fderiv_within_univ_at] }
end
lemma differentiable_within_at_inter (xs : x ∈ s) (xt : x ∈ t) (ht : is_open t) :
differentiable_within_at k f (s ∩ t) x ↔ differentiable_within_at k f s x :=
by simp only [differentiable_within_at, has_fderiv_within_at, has_fderiv_at_filter,
nhds_within_restrict s xt ht]
lemma differentiable_on_of_locally_differentiable_on
(h : ∀x∈s, ∃u, is_open u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ differentiable_on k f (s ∩ u)) : differentiable_on k f s :=
begin
assume x xs,
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩,
exact (differentiable_within_at_inter xs xt t_open).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
end
end fderiv_properties
/- Congr -/
section congr
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_congr'
(hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₀ : {x | f₀ x = f₁ x} ∈ L) (h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ has_fderiv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L :=
by { rw (ext h₁), exact is_o_congr
(by filter_upwards [h₀] λ x (h : _ = _), by simp [h, hx])
(univ_mem_sets' $ λ _, rfl) }
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_congr
(h₀ : ∀ x, f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ has_fderiv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_congr' (h₀ _) (univ_mem_sets' h₀) h₁
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.congr
(h₀ : ∀ x, f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f₀ f₀' x L → has_fderiv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L :=
(has_fderiv_at_filter_congr h₀ h₁).1
theorem has_fderiv_within_at_congr
(h₀ : ∀ x, f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f₀ f₀' s x ↔ has_fderiv_within_at f₁ f₁' s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_congr h₀ h₁
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.congr
(h₀ : ∀ x, f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f₀ f₀' s x → has_fderiv_within_at f₁ f₁' s x :=
(has_fderiv_within_at_congr h₀ h₁).1
theorem has_fderiv_at_congr
(h₀ : ∀ x, f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) :
has_fderiv_at f₀ f₀' x ↔ has_fderiv_at f₁ f₁' x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_congr h₀ h₁
theorem has_fderiv_at.congr
(h₀ : ∀ x, f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) :
has_fderiv_at f₀ f₀' x → has_fderiv_at f₁ f₁' x :=
(has_fderiv_at_congr h₀ h₁).1
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.congr' (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L)
(hL : {x | f₁ x = f x} ∈ L) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_fderiv_at_filter f₁ f' x L :=
begin
refine (asymptotics.is_o_congr_left _).1 h,
convert hL,
ext,
finish [hx],
end
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.congr_mono (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (ht : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : has_fderiv_within_at f₁ f' t x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.congr' (h.mono h₁) (filter.mem_inf_sets_of_right ht) hx
lemma differentiable_within_at.congr_mono (h : differentiable_within_at k f s x)
(ht : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : differentiable_within_at k f₁ t x :=
(has_fderiv_within_at.congr_mono h.has_fderiv_within_at ht hx h₁).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.congr (h : differentiable_at k f x) (h' : ∀x, f₁ x = f x) :
differentiable_at k f₁ x :=
by { have : f₁ = f, by { ext y, exact h' y }, rwa this }
lemma differentiable_on.congr_mono (h : differentiable_on k f s) (h' : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(h₁ : t ⊆ s) : differentiable_on k f₁ t :=
λ x hx, (h x (h₁ hx)).congr_mono h' (h' x hx) h₁
lemma differentiable.congr (h : differentiable k f) (h' : ∀x, f₁ x = f x) :
differentiable k f₁ :=
by { have : f₁ = f, by { ext y, exact h' y }, rwa this }
lemma differentiable.congr' (h : differentiable_at k f x)
(hL : {y | f₁ y = f y} ∈ nhds x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
differentiable_at k f₁ x :=
has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at (has_fderiv_at_filter.congr' h.has_fderiv_at hL hx)
lemma differentiable_within_at.fderiv_within_congr_mono (h : differentiable_within_at k f s x)
(hs : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (hxt : unique_diff_within_at k t x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) :
fderiv_within k f₁ t x = fderiv_within k f s x :=
(has_fderiv_within_at.congr_mono h.has_fderiv_within_at hs hx h₁).fderiv_within hxt
lemma differentiable_at.fderiv_congr (h : differentiable_at k f x) (h' : ∀x, f₁ x = f x) :
fderiv k f₁ x = fderiv k f x :=
by { have : f₁ = f, by { ext y, exact h' y }, rwa this }
lemma differentiable_at.fderiv_congr' (h : differentiable_at k f x)
(hL : {y | f₁ y = f y} ∈ nhds x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
fderiv k f₁ x = fderiv k f x :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (has_fderiv_at_filter.congr' h.has_fderiv_at hL hx)
end congr
/- id -/
section id
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_id (x : E) (L : filter E) :
has_fderiv_at_filter id (id : E →L[k] E) x L :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ by simp
theorem has_fderiv_within_at_id (x : E) (s : set E) :
has_fderiv_within_at id (id : E →L[k] E) s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_id _ _
theorem has_fderiv_at_id (x : E) : has_fderiv_at id (id : E →L[k] E) x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_id _ _
lemma differentiable_at_id : differentiable_at k id x :=
(has_fderiv_at_id x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at_id : differentiable_within_at k id s x :=
differentiable_at_id.differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_id : differentiable k (id : E → E) :=
λx, differentiable_at_id
lemma differentiable_on_id : differentiable_on k id s :=
differentiable_id.differentiable_on
lemma fderiv_id : fderiv k id x = id :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (has_fderiv_at_id x)
lemma fderiv_within_id (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x) :
fderiv_within k id s x = id :=
begin
rw differentiable.fderiv_within (differentiable_at_id) hxs,
exact fderiv_id
end
end id
/- constants -/
section const
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_const (c : F) (x : E) (L : filter E) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, c) (0 : E →L[k] F) x L :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ λ _, by simp only [zero_apply, sub_self]
theorem has_fderiv_within_at_const (c : F) (x : E) (s : set E) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, c) (0 : E →L[k] F) s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_const _ _ _
theorem has_fderiv_at_const (c : F) (x : E) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, c) (0 : E →L[k] F) x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_const _ _ _
lemma differentiable_at_const (c : F) : differentiable_at k (λx, c) x :=
⟨0, has_fderiv_at_const c x⟩
lemma differentiable_within_at_const (c : F) : differentiable_within_at k (λx, c) s x :=
differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at (differentiable_at_const _)
lemma fderiv_const (c : F) : fderiv k (λy, c) x = 0 :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (has_fderiv_at_const c x)
lemma fderiv_within_const (c : F) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x) :
fderiv_within k (λy, c) s x = 0 :=
begin
rw differentiable.fderiv_within (differentiable_at_const _) hxs,
exact fderiv_const _
end
lemma differentiable_const (c : F) : differentiable k (λx : E, c) :=
λx, differentiable_at_const _
lemma differentiable_on_const (c : F) : differentiable_on k (λx, c) s :=
(differentiable_const _).differentiable_on
end const
/- Bounded linear maps -/
section is_bounded_linear_map
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.has_fderiv_at_filter (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f h.to_bounded_linear_map x L :=
begin
have : (λ (x' : E), f x' - f x - h.to_bounded_linear_map (x' - x)) = λx', 0,
{ ext,
have : ∀a, h.to_bounded_linear_map a = f a := λa, rfl,
simp,
simp [this] },
rw [has_fderiv_at_filter, this],
exact asymptotics.is_o_zero _ _
end
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.has_fderiv_within_at (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f) :
has_fderiv_within_at f h.to_bounded_linear_map s x :=
h.has_fderiv_at_filter
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.has_fderiv_at (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f) :
has_fderiv_at f h.to_bounded_linear_map x :=
h.has_fderiv_at_filter
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.differentiable_at (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f) :
differentiable_at k f x :=
h.has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.differentiable_within_at (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f) :
differentiable_within_at k f s x :=
h.differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.fderiv (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f) :
fderiv k f x = h.to_bounded_linear_map :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (h.has_fderiv_at)
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.fderiv_within (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x) : fderiv_within k f s x = h.to_bounded_linear_map :=
begin
rw differentiable.fderiv_within h.differentiable_at hxs,
exact h.fderiv
end
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.differentiable (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f) :
differentiable k f :=
λx, h.differentiable_at
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.differentiable_on (h : is_bounded_linear_map k f) :
differentiable_on k f s :=
h.differentiable.differentiable_on
end is_bounded_linear_map
/- multiplication by a constant -/
section smul_const
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.smul (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : k) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') x L :=
(is_o_const_smul_left h c).congr_left $ λ x, by simp [smul_neg, smul_add]
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.smul (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (c : k) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') s x :=
h.smul c
theorem has_fderiv_at.smul (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : k) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') x :=
h.smul c
lemma differentiable_within_at.smul (h : differentiable_within_at k f s x) (c : k) :
differentiable_within_at k (λy, c • f y) s x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at.smul c).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.smul (h : differentiable_at k f x) (c : k) :
differentiable_at k (λy, c • f y) x :=
(h.has_fderiv_at.smul c).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.smul (h : differentiable_on k f s) (c : k) :
differentiable_on k (λy, c • f y) s :=
λx hx, (h x hx).smul c
lemma differentiable.smul (h : differentiable k f) (c : k) :
differentiable k (λy, c • f y) :=
λx, (h x).smul c
lemma fderiv_within_smul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at k f s x) (c : k) :
fderiv_within k (λy, c • f y) s x = c • fderiv_within k f s x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at.smul c).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_smul (h : differentiable_at k f x) (c : k) :
fderiv k (λy, c • f y) x = c • fderiv k f x :=
(h.has_fderiv_at.smul c).fderiv
end smul_const
/- add -/
section add
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.add
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (hg : has_fderiv_at_filter g g' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') x L :=
(hf.add hg).congr_left $ λ _, by simp
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.add
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_fderiv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
theorem has_fderiv_at.add
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hg : has_fderiv_at g g' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
lemma differentiable_within_at.add
(hf : differentiable_within_at k f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at k g s x) :
differentiable_within_at k (λ y, f y + g y) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.add hg.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.add
(hf : differentiable_at k f x) (hg : differentiable_at k g x) :
differentiable_at k (λ y, f y + g y) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.add hg.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.add
(hf : differentiable_on k f s) (hg : differentiable_on k g s) :
differentiable_on k (λy, f y + g y) s :=
λx hx, (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
lemma differentiable.add
(hf : differentiable k f) (hg : differentiable k g) :
differentiable k (λy, f y + g y) :=
λx, (hf x).add (hg x)
lemma fderiv_within_add (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at k f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at k g s x) :
fderiv_within k (λy, f y + g y) s x = fderiv_within k f s x + fderiv_within k g s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.add hg.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_add
(hf : differentiable_at k f x) (hg : differentiable_at k g x) :
fderiv k (λy, f y + g y) x = fderiv k f x + fderiv k g x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.add hg.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
end add
/- neg -/
section neg
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.neg (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, -f x) (-f') x L :=
(h.smul (-1:k)).congr (by simp) (by simp)
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.neg (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
theorem has_fderiv_at.neg (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
lemma differentiable_within_at.neg (h : differentiable_within_at k f s x) :
differentiable_within_at k (λy, -f y) s x :=
h.has_fderiv_within_at.neg.differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.neg (h : differentiable_at k f x) :
differentiable_at k (λy, -f y) x :=
h.has_fderiv_at.neg.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.neg (h : differentiable_on k f s) :
differentiable_on k (λy, -f y) s :=
λx hx, (h x hx).neg
lemma differentiable.neg (h : differentiable k f) :
differentiable k (λy, -f y) :=
λx, (h x).neg
lemma fderiv_within_neg (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at k f s x) :
fderiv_within k (λy, -f y) s x = - fderiv_within k f s x :=
h.has_fderiv_within_at.neg.fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_neg (h : differentiable_at k f x) :
fderiv k (λy, -f y) x = - fderiv k f x :=
h.has_fderiv_at.neg.fderiv
end neg
/- sub -/
section sub
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.sub
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (hg : has_fderiv_at_filter g g' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x L :=
hf.add hg.neg
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.sub
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_fderiv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
hf.sub hg
theorem has_fderiv_at.sub
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hg : has_fderiv_at g g' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.sub hg
lemma differentiable_within_at.sub
(hf : differentiable_within_at k f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at k g s x) :
differentiable_within_at k (λ y, f y - g y) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sub hg.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.sub
(hf : differentiable_at k f x) (hg : differentiable_at k g x) :
differentiable_at k (λ y, f y - g y) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.sub hg.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sub
(hf : differentiable_on k f s) (hg : differentiable_on k g s) :
differentiable_on k (λy, f y - g y) s :=
λx hx, (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
lemma differentiable.sub
(hf : differentiable k f) (hg : differentiable k g) :
differentiable k (λy, f y - g y) :=
λx, (hf x).sub (hg x)
lemma fderiv_within_sub (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at k f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at k g s x) :
fderiv_within k (λy, f y - g y) s x = fderiv_within k f s x - fderiv_within k g s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sub hg.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_sub
(hf : differentiable_at k f x) (hg : differentiable_at k g x) :
fderiv k (λy, f y - g y) x = fderiv k f x - fderiv k g x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.sub hg.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.is_O_sub (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
is_O (λ x', f x' - f x) (λ x', x' - x) L :=
h.to_is_O.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.is_O_sub _ _)
end sub
/- Continuity -/
section continuous
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds
(hL : L ≤ nhds x) (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
tendsto f L (nhds (f x)) :=
begin
have : tendsto (λ x', f x' - f x) L (nhds 0),
{ refine h.is_O_sub.trans_tendsto (tendsto_le_left hL _),
rw ← sub_self x, exact tendsto_sub tendsto_id tendsto_const_nhds },
have := tendsto_add this tendsto_const_nhds,
rw zero_add (f x) at this,
exact this.congr (by simp)
end
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.continuous_within_at
(h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds lattice.inf_le_left h
theorem has_fderiv_at.continuous_at (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
continuous_at f x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds (le_refl _) h
lemma differentiable_within_at.continuous_within_at (h : differentiable_within_at k f s x) :
continuous_within_at f s x :=
let ⟨f', hf'⟩ := h in hf'.continuous_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.continuous_at (h : differentiable_at k f x) : continuous_at f x :=
let ⟨f', hf'⟩ := h in hf'.continuous_at
lemma differentiable_on.continuous_on (h : differentiable_on k f s) : continuous_on f s :=
λx hx, (h x hx).continuous_within_at
lemma differentiable.continuous (h : differentiable k f) : continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λx, (h x).continuous_at
end continuous
/- Bounded bilinear maps -/
section bilinear_map
variables {b : E × F → G} {u : set (E × F) }
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) (p : E × F) :
has_fderiv_at b (h.deriv p) p :=
begin
have : (λ (x : E × F), b x - b p - (h.deriv p) (x - p)) = (λx, b (x.1 - p.1, x.2 - p.2)),
{ ext x,
delta is_bounded_bilinear_map.deriv,
change b x - b p - (b (p.1, x.2-p.2) + b (x.1-p.1, p.2))
= b (x.1 - p.1, x.2 - p.2),
have : b x = b (x.1, x.2), by { cases x, refl },
rw this,
have : b p = b (p.1, p.2), by { cases p, refl },
rw this,
simp only [h.map_sub_left, h.map_sub_right],
abel },
rw [has_fderiv_at, has_fderiv_at_filter, this],
rcases h.bound with ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩,
have A : asymptotics.is_O (λx : E × F, b (x.1 - p.1, x.2 - p.2))
(λx, ∥x - p∥ * ∥x - p∥) (nhds p) :=
⟨C, Cpos, filter.univ_mem_sets' (λx, begin
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, norm_mul, norm_norm],
calc ∥b (x.1 - p.1, x.2 - p.2)∥ ≤ C * ∥x.1 - p.1∥ * ∥x.2 - p.2∥ : hC _ _
... ≤ C * ∥x-p∥ * ∥x-p∥ : by apply_rules [mul_le_mul, le_max_left, le_max_right, norm_nonneg,
le_of_lt Cpos, le_refl, mul_nonneg, norm_nonneg, norm_nonneg]
... = C * (∥x-p∥ * ∥x-p∥) : mul_assoc _ _ _ end)⟩,
have B : asymptotics.is_o (λ (x : E × F), ∥x - p∥ * ∥x - p∥)
(λx, 1 * ∥x - p∥) (nhds p),
{ apply asymptotics.is_o_mul_right _ (asymptotics.is_O_refl _ _),
rw [asymptotics.is_o_iff_tendsto],
{ simp only [div_one],
have : 0 = ∥p - p∥, by simp,
rw this,
have : continuous (λx, ∥x-p∥) :=
continuous_norm.comp (continuous_sub continuous_id continuous_const),
exact this.tendsto p },
simp only [forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero, forall_true_iff] },
simp only [one_mul, asymptotics.is_o_norm_right] at B,
exact A.trans_is_o B
end
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_within_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) (p : E × F) :
has_fderiv_within_at b (h.deriv p) u p :=
(h.has_fderiv_at p).has_fderiv_within_at
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.differentiable_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) (p : E × F) :
differentiable_at k b p :=
(h.has_fderiv_at p).differentiable_at
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.differentiable_within_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) (p : E × F) :
differentiable_within_at k b u p :=
(h.differentiable_at p).differentiable_within_at
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.fderiv (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) (p : E × F) :
fderiv k b p = h.deriv p :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (h.has_fderiv_at p)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.fderiv_within (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) (p : E × F)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at k u p) : fderiv_within k b u p = h.deriv p :=
begin
rw differentiable.fderiv_within (h.differentiable_at p) hxs,
exact h.fderiv p
end
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.differentiable (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) :
differentiable k b :=
λx, h.differentiable_at x
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.differentiable_on (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) :
differentiable_on k b u :=
h.differentiable.differentiable_on
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map k b) :
continuous b :=
h.differentiable.continuous
end bilinear_map
/- Cartesian products -/
section cartesian_product
variables {f₂ : E → G} {f₂' : E →L[k] G}
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.prod
(hf₁ : has_fderiv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L) (hf₂ : has_fderiv_at_filter f₂ f₂' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λx, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (bounded_linear_map.prod f₁' f₂') x L :=
begin
have : (λ (x' : E), (f₁ x', f₂ x') - (f₁ x, f₂ x) - (bounded_linear_map.prod f₁' f₂') (x' -x)) =
(λ (x' : E), (f₁ x' - f₁ x - f₁' (x' - x), f₂ x' - f₂ x - f₂' (x' - x))) := rfl,
rw [has_fderiv_at_filter, this],
rw [asymptotics.is_o_prod_left],
exact ⟨hf₁, hf₂⟩
end
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.prod
(hf₁ : has_fderiv_within_at f₁ f₁' s x) (hf₂ : has_fderiv_within_at f₂ f₂' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λx, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (bounded_linear_map.prod f₁' f₂') s x :=
hf₁.prod hf₂
lemma has_fderiv_at.prod (hf₁ : has_fderiv_at f₁ f₁' x) (hf₂ : has_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λx, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (bounded_linear_map.prod f₁' f₂') x :=
hf₁.prod hf₂
lemma differentiable_within_at.prod
(hf₁ : differentiable_within_at k f₁ s x) (hf₂ : differentiable_within_at k f₂ s x) :
differentiable_within_at k (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s x :=
(hf₁.has_fderiv_within_at.prod hf₂.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.prod (hf₁ : differentiable_at k f₁ x) (hf₂ : differentiable_at k f₂ x) :
differentiable_at k (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) x :=
(hf₁.has_fderiv_at.prod hf₂.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.prod (hf₁ : differentiable_on k f₁ s) (hf₂ : differentiable_on k f₂ s) :
differentiable_on k (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s :=
λx hx, differentiable_within_at.prod (hf₁ x hx) (hf₂ x hx)
lemma differentiable.prod (hf₁ : differentiable k f₁) (hf₂ : differentiable k f₂) :
differentiable k (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) :=
λ x, differentiable_at.prod (hf₁ x) (hf₂ x)
lemma differentiable_at.fderiv_prod
(hf₁ : differentiable_at k f₁ x) (hf₂ : differentiable_at k f₂ x) :
fderiv k (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) x =
bounded_linear_map.prod (fderiv k f₁ x) (fderiv k f₂ x) :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (has_fderiv_at.prod hf₁.has_fderiv_at hf₂.has_fderiv_at)
lemma differentiable_at.fderiv_within_prod
(hf₁ : differentiable_within_at k f₁ s x) (hf₂ : differentiable_within_at k f₂ s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x) :
fderiv_within k (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s x =
bounded_linear_map.prod (fderiv_within k f₁ s x) (fderiv_within k f₂ s x) :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ hxs,
exact has_fderiv_within_at.prod hf₁.has_fderiv_within_at hf₂.has_fderiv_within_at
end
end cartesian_product
/- Composition -/
section composition
/- For composition lemmas, we put x explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition -/
variable (x)
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[k] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_at_filter g g' (f x) (L.map f))
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L :=
let eq₁ := (g'.is_O_comp _ _).trans_is_o hf in
let eq₂ := ((hg.comp f).mono le_comap_map).trans_is_O hf.is_O_sub in
by { refine eq₂.tri (eq₁.congr_left (λ x', _)), simp }
/- A readable version of the previous theorem,
a general form of the chain rule. -/
example {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[k] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_at_filter g g' (f x) (L.map f))
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L :=
begin
unfold has_fderiv_at_filter at hg,
have : is_o (λ x', g (f x') - g (f x) - g' (f x' - f x)) (λ x', f x' - f x) L,
from (hg.comp f).mono le_comap_map,
have eq₁ : is_o (λ x', g (f x') - g (f x) - g' (f x' - f x)) (λ x', x' - x) L,
from this.trans_is_O hf.is_O_sub,
have eq₂ : is_o (λ x', f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) (λ x', x' - x) L,
from hf,
have : is_O
(λ x', g' (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x))) (λ x', f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) L,
from g'.is_O_comp _ _,
have : is_o (λ x', g' (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x))) (λ x', x' - x) L,
from this.trans_is_o eq₂,
have eq₃ : is_o (λ x', g' (f x' - f x) - (g' (f' (x' - x)))) (λ x', x' - x) L,
by { refine this.congr_left _, simp},
exact eq₁.tri eq₃
end
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[k] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_within_at g g' (f '' s) (f x))
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
(has_fderiv_at_filter.mono hg
hf.continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image).comp x hf
/-- The chain rule. -/
theorem has_fderiv_at.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[k] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_at g g' (f x)) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x :=
(hg.mono hf.continuous_at).comp x hf
theorem has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[k] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_at g g' (f x)) (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
begin
rw ← has_fderiv_within_univ_at at hg,
exact has_fderiv_within_at.comp x (hg.mono (subset_univ _)) hf
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.comp {g : F → G} {t : set F}
(hg : differentiable_within_at k g t (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at k f s x)
(h : f '' s ⊆ t) : differentiable_within_at k (g ∘ f) s x :=
begin
rcases hf with ⟨f', hf'⟩,
rcases hg with ⟨g', hg'⟩,
exact ⟨bounded_linear_map.comp g' f', (hg'.mono h).comp x hf'⟩
end
lemma differentiable_at.comp {g : F → G}
(hg : differentiable_at k g (f x)) (hf : differentiable_at k f x) :
differentiable_at k (g ∘ f) x :=
(hg.has_fderiv_at.comp x hf.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma fderiv_within.comp {g : F → G} {t : set F}
(hg : differentiable_within_at k g t (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at k f s x)
(h : f '' s ⊆ t) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x) :
fderiv_within k (g ∘ f) s x =
bounded_linear_map.comp (fderiv_within k g t (f x)) (fderiv_within k f s x) :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ hxs,
apply has_fderiv_within_at.comp x _ (hf.has_fderiv_within_at),
apply hg.has_fderiv_within_at.mono h
end
lemma fderiv.comp {g : F → G}
(hg : differentiable_at k g (f x)) (hf : differentiable_at k f x) :
fderiv k (g ∘ f) x = bounded_linear_map.comp (fderiv k g (f x)) (fderiv k f x) :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_at.fderiv,
exact has_fderiv_at.comp x hg.has_fderiv_at hf.has_fderiv_at
end
lemma differentiable_on.comp {g : F → G} {t : set F}
(hg : differentiable_on k g t) (hf : differentiable_on k f s) (st : f '' s ⊆ t) :
differentiable_on k (g ∘ f) s :=
λx hx, differentiable_within_at.comp x (hg (f x) (st (mem_image_of_mem _ hx))) (hf x hx) st
end composition
/- Multiplication by a scalar function -/
section smul
variables {c : E → k} {c' : E →L[k] k}
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.smul'
(hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.scalar_prod_space_iso (f x)) s x :=
begin
have : is_bounded_bilinear_map k (λ (p : k × F), p.1 • p.2) := is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul,
exact has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x (this.has_fderiv_at (c x, f x)) (hc.prod hf)
end
theorem has_fderiv_at.smul' (hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.scalar_prod_space_iso (f x)) x :=
begin
have : is_bounded_bilinear_map k (λ (p : k × F), p.1 • p.2) := is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul,
exact has_fderiv_at.comp x (this.has_fderiv_at (c x, f x)) (hc.prod hf)
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.smul'
(hc : differentiable_within_at k c s x) (hf : differentiable_within_at k f s x) :
differentiable_within_at k (λ y, c y • f y) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul' hf.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.smul' (hc : differentiable_at k c x) (hf : differentiable_at k f x) :
differentiable_at k (λ y, c y • f y) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul' hf.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.smul' (hc : differentiable_on k c s) (hf : differentiable_on k f s) :
differentiable_on k (λ y, c y • f y) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).smul' (hf x hx)
lemma differentiable.smul' (hc : differentiable k c) (hf : differentiable k f) :
differentiable k (λ y, c y • f y) :=
λx, (hc x).smul' (hf x)
lemma fderiv_within_smul' (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at k c s x) (hf : differentiable_within_at k f s x) :
fderiv_within k (λ y, c y • f y) s x =
c x • fderiv_within k f s x + (fderiv_within k c s x).scalar_prod_space_iso (f x) :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul' hf.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_smul' (hc : differentiable_at k c x) (hf : differentiable_at k f x) :
fderiv k (λ y, c y • f y) x =
c x • fderiv k f x + (fderiv k c x).scalar_prod_space_iso (f x) :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul' hf.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
end smul
/- Multiplication of scalar functions -/
section mul
variables {c d : E → k} {c' d' : E →L[k] k}
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.mul
(hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (hd : has_fderiv_within_at d d' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') s x :=
begin
have : is_bounded_bilinear_map k (λ (p : k × k), p.1 * p.2) := is_bounded_bilinear_map_mul,
convert has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x (this.has_fderiv_at (c x, d x)) (hc.prod hd),
ext z,
change c x * d' z + d x * c' z = c x * d' z + c' z * d x,
ring
end
theorem has_fderiv_at.mul (hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (hd : has_fderiv_at d d' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') x :=
begin
have : is_bounded_bilinear_map k (λ (p : k × k), p.1 * p.2) := is_bounded_bilinear_map_mul,
convert has_fderiv_at.comp x (this.has_fderiv_at (c x, d x)) (hc.prod hd),
ext z,
change c x * d' z + d x * c' z = c x * d' z + c' z * d x,
ring
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.mul
(hc : differentiable_within_at k c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at k d s x) :
differentiable_within_at k (λ y, c y * d y) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.mul hd.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.mul (hc : differentiable_at k c x) (hd : differentiable_at k d x) :
differentiable_at k (λ y, c y * d y) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.mul hd.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.mul (hc : differentiable_on k c s) (hd : differentiable_on k d s) :
differentiable_on k (λ y, c y * d y) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).mul (hd x hx)
lemma differentiable.mul (hc : differentiable k c) (hd : differentiable k d) :
differentiable k (λ y, c y * d y) :=
λx, (hc x).mul (hd x)
lemma fderiv_within_mul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at k s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at k c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at k d s x) :
fderiv_within k (λ y, c y * d y) s x =
c x • fderiv_within k d s x + d x • fderiv_within k c s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.mul hd.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_mul (hc : differentiable_at k c x) (hd : differentiable_at k d x) :
fderiv k (λ y, c y * d y) x =
c x • fderiv k d x + d x • fderiv k c x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.mul hd.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
end mul
end
/-
In the special case of a normed space over the reals,
we can use scalar multiplication in the `tendsto` characterization
of the Fréchet derivative.
-/
section
variables {E : Type*} [normed_space ℝ E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_space ℝ F]
variables {G : Type*} [normed_space ℝ G]
set_option class.instance_max_depth 34
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_real_equiv {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[ℝ] F} {x : E} {L : filter E} :
tendsto (λ x' : E, ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥) L (nhds 0) ↔
tendsto (λ x' : E, ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ • (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x))) L (nhds 0) :=
begin
symmetry,
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero], refine tendsto.congr'r (λ x', _),
have : ∥x' + -x∥⁻¹ ≥ 0, from inv_nonneg.mpr (norm_nonneg _),
simp [norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg this]
end
end
|
3ef90b653d0c73611ed72b398c633c21987c765f | 704c0b4221e71a413a9270e3160af0813f426c91 | /src/partition.lean | ea8bdd2bcc51c46adc9a54fe3dae3898ea9d65b1 | [] | no_license | CohenCyril/LP | d39b766199d2176b592ff223f9c00cdcb4d5f76d | 4dca829aa0fe94c0627410b88d9dad54e6ed2c63 | refs/heads/master | 1,596,132,000,357 | 1,568,817,913,000 | 1,568,817,913,000 | 210,310,499 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,569,229,479,000 | 1,569,229,479,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 18,644 | lean | import data.matrix.pequiv data.rat.basic data.vector2
variables {m n : ℕ}
/-- The type of ordered partitions of `m + n` elements into vectors of
`m` row variables and `n` column variables -/
structure partition (m n : ℕ) : Type :=
(row_indices : vector (fin (m + n)) m)
(col_indices : vector (fin (m + n)) n)
(mem_row_indices_or_col_indices :
∀ v : fin (m + n), v ∈ row_indices.to_list ∨ v ∈ col_indices.to_list)
open pequiv function matrix finset fintype
namespace partition
local infix ` ⬝ `:70 := matrix.mul
local postfix `ᵀ` : 1500 := transpose
variable (P : partition m n)
def fintype_aux : partition m n ≃ { x : vector (fin (m + n)) m × vector (fin (m + n)) n //
∀ v : fin (m + n), v ∈ x.1.to_list ∨ v ∈ x.2.to_list } :=
{ to_fun := λ ⟨r, c, h⟩, ⟨⟨r, c⟩, h⟩,
inv_fun := λ ⟨⟨r, c⟩, h⟩, ⟨r, c, h⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨r, c, h⟩, rfl,
right_inv := λ ⟨⟨r, c⟩, h⟩, rfl }
instance : fintype (partition m n) := fintype.of_equiv _ fintype_aux.symm
def rowg : fin m → fin (m + n) := P.row_indices.nth
def colg : fin n → fin (m + n) := P.col_indices.nth
lemma mem_row_indices_iff_exists {v : fin (m + n)} :
v ∈ P.row_indices.to_list ↔ ∃ i, v = P.rowg i :=
by simp only [vector.mem_iff_nth, eq_comm, rowg]
lemma mem_col_indices_iff_exists {v : fin (m + n)} :
v ∈ P.col_indices.to_list ↔ ∃ j, v = P.colg j :=
by simp only [vector.mem_iff_nth, eq_comm, colg]
lemma eq_rowg_or_colg (v : fin (m + n)) : (∃ i, v = P.rowg i) ∨ (∃ j, v = P.colg j) :=
by rw [← mem_row_indices_iff_exists, ← mem_col_indices_iff_exists];
exact P.mem_row_indices_or_col_indices _
lemma row_indices_append_col_indices_nodup : (P.row_indices.append P.col_indices).to_list.nodup :=
vector.nodup_iff_nth_inj.2 $ fintype.injective_iff_surjective.2 $ λ v,
(P.mem_row_indices_or_col_indices v).elim
(by rw [← vector.mem_iff_nth]; simp {contextual := tt})
(by rw [← vector.mem_iff_nth]; simp {contextual := tt})
lemma row_indices_nodup : P.row_indices.to_list.nodup :=
begin
have := P.row_indices_append_col_indices_nodup,
simp [list.nodup_append] at this, tauto
end
lemma col_indices_nodup : P.col_indices.to_list.nodup :=
begin
have := P.row_indices_append_col_indices_nodup,
simp [list.nodup_append] at this, tauto
end
@[simp] lemma rowg_ne_colg (i j) : P.rowg i ≠ P.colg j :=
λ h, begin
rw [rowg, colg] at h,
have := P.row_indices_append_col_indices_nodup,
rw [vector.to_list_append (P.row_indices) (P.col_indices), list.nodup_append,
list.disjoint_right] at this,
exact this.2.2 (by rw h; exact vector.nth_mem _ _) (vector.nth_mem i P.row_indices)
end
@[simp] lemma colg_ne_rowg (i j) : P.colg j ≠ P.rowg i := ne.symm $ rowg_ne_colg _ _ _
lemma injective_rowg : injective P.rowg :=
vector.nodup_iff_nth_inj.1 P.row_indices_nodup
@[simp] lemma rowg_inj {i i' : fin m} : P.rowg i = P.rowg i' ↔ i = i' := P.injective_rowg.eq_iff
lemma injective_colg : injective P.colg :=
vector.nodup_iff_nth_inj.1 P.col_indices_nodup
@[simp] lemma colg_inj {j j' : fin n} : P.colg j = P.colg j' ↔ j = j' := P.injective_colg.eq_iff
def rowp : fin (m + n) ≃. fin m :=
{ to_fun := λ v, fin.find (λ i, P.rowg i = v),
inv_fun := λ i, some (P.rowg i),
inv := λ v i, begin
cases h : fin.find (λ i, P.rowg i = v),
{ simp [fin.find_eq_none_iff, *] at * },
{ rw [fin.find_eq_some_iff] at h,
cases h with h _,
subst h,
simp [P.injective_rowg.eq_iff, eq_comm] }
end }
def colp : fin (m + n) ≃. fin n :=
{ to_fun := λ v, fin.find (λ j, P.colg j = v),
inv_fun := λ j, some (P.colg j),
inv := λ v j, begin
cases h : fin.find (λ j, P.colg j = v),
{ simp [fin.find_eq_none_iff, *] at * },
{ rw [fin.find_eq_some_iff] at h,
cases h with h _,
subst h,
simp [P.injective_rowg.eq_iff, eq_comm] }
end }
@[simp] lemma rowp_trans_rowp_symm : P.rowp.symm.trans P.rowp = pequiv.refl _ :=
trans_symm_eq_iff_forall_is_some.2 (λ _, rfl)
@[simp] lemma colp_trans_colp_symm : P.colp.symm.trans P.colp = pequiv.refl _ :=
trans_symm_eq_iff_forall_is_some.2 (λ _, rfl)
@[simp] lemma rowg_mem (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) : (P.rowg r) ∈ P.rowp.symm r := eq.refl _
lemma rowp_symm_eq_some_rowg (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) : P.rowp.symm r = some (P.rowg r) := rfl
@[simp] lemma colg_mem (P : partition m n) (s : fin n) : (P.colg s) ∈ P.colp.symm s := eq.refl _
lemma colp_symm_eq_some_colg (P : partition m n) (s : fin n) : P.colp.symm s = some (P.colg s) := rfl
@[simp] lemma rowp_rowg (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) : P.rowp (P.rowg r) = some r :=
P.rowp.symm.mem_iff_mem.2 (rowg_mem _ _)
@[simp] lemma colp_colg (P : partition m n) (s : fin n) : P.colp (P.colg s) = some s :=
P.colp.symm.mem_iff_mem.2 (colg_mem _ _)
@[simp] lemma rowp_symm_trans_colp : P.rowp.symm.trans P.colp = ⊥ :=
begin
ext,
dsimp [pequiv.trans, colp],
simp [P.rowp_symm_eq_some_rowg, fin.find_eq_some_iff],
end
@[simp] lemma colg_get_colp_symm (v : fin (m + n)) (h : (P.colp v).is_some) :
P.colg (option.get h) = v :=
let ⟨j, hj⟩ := option.is_some_iff_exists.1 h in
have hj' : j ∈ P.colp (P.colg (option.get h)), by simpa,
P.colp.inj hj' hj
@[simp] lemma rowg_get_rowp_symm (v : fin (m + n)) (h : (P.rowp v).is_some) :
P.rowg (option.get h) = v :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := option.is_some_iff_exists.1 h in
have hi' : i ∈ P.rowp (P.rowg (option.get h)), by simpa,
P.rowp.inj hi' hi
def default : partition m n :=
{ row_indices := ⟨(list.fin_range m).map (fin.cast_add _), by simp⟩,
col_indices := ⟨(list.fin_range n).map
(λ i, ⟨m + i.1, add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (le_refl _) i.2⟩), by simp⟩,
mem_row_indices_or_col_indices := λ v,
if h : v.1 < m
then or.inl (list.mem_map.2 ⟨⟨v.1, h⟩, list.mem_fin_range _, fin.eta _ _⟩)
else have v.val - m < n, from (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add (le_of_not_gt h)).2 v.2,
or.inr (list.mem_map.2 ⟨⟨v.1 - m, this⟩, list.mem_fin_range _,
by simp [nat.add_sub_cancel' (le_of_not_gt h)]⟩) }
instance : inhabited (partition m n) := ⟨default⟩
lemma is_some_rowp_symm (P : partition m n) : ∀ (i : fin m), (P.rowp.symm i).is_some := λ _, rfl
lemma is_some_colp_symm (P : partition m n) : ∀ (k : fin n), (P.colp.symm k).is_some := λ _, rfl
lemma injective_rowp_symm (P : partition m n) : injective P.rowp.symm :=
injective_of_forall_is_some (is_some_rowp_symm P)
lemma injective_colp_symm (P : partition m n) : injective P.colp.symm :=
injective_of_forall_is_some (is_some_colp_symm P)
@[elab_as_eliminator] def row_col_cases_on {C : fin (m + n) → Sort*} (P : partition m n)
(v : fin (m + n)) (row : fin m → C v) (col : fin n → C v) : C v :=
begin
cases h : P.rowp v with r,
{ exact col (option.get (show (P.colp v).is_some,
from (P.eq_rowg_or_colg v).elim (λ ⟨r, hr⟩, absurd h (hr.symm ▸ by simp))
(λ ⟨c, hc⟩, hc.symm ▸ by simp))) },
{ exact row r }
end
@[simp] lemma row_col_cases_on_rowg {C : fin (m + n) → Sort*} (P : partition m n)
(r : fin m) (row : fin m → C (P.rowg r)) (col : fin n → C (P.rowg r)) :
(row_col_cases_on P (P.rowg r) row col : C (P.rowg r)) = row r :=
by simp [row_col_cases_on]
local infix ` ♣ `: 70 := pequiv.trans
def swap (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) (s : fin n) : partition m n :=
{ row_indices := P.row_indices.update_nth r (P.col_indices.nth s),
col_indices := P.col_indices.update_nth s (P.row_indices.nth r),
mem_row_indices_or_col_indices := λ v,
(P.mem_row_indices_or_col_indices v).elim
(λ h, begin
revert h,
simp only [vector.mem_iff_nth, exists_imp_distrib, vector.nth_update_nth_eq_if],
intros i hi,
subst hi,
by_cases r = i,
{ right, use s, simp [h] },
{ left, use i, simp [h] }
end)
(λ h, begin
revert h,
simp only [vector.mem_iff_nth, exists_imp_distrib, vector.nth_update_nth_eq_if],
intros j hj,
subst hj,
by_cases s = j,
{ left, use r, simp [h] },
{ right, use j, simp [h] }
end)}
lemma not_is_some_colp_of_is_some_rowp (P : partition m n) (j : fin (m + n)) :
(P.rowp j).is_some → (P.colp j).is_some → false :=
begin
rw [option.is_some_iff_exists, option.is_some_iff_exists],
rintros ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨k, hk⟩,
have : P.rowp.symm.trans P.colp i = none,
{ rw [P.rowp_symm_trans_colp, pequiv.bot_apply] },
rw [pequiv.trans_eq_none] at this,
rw [← pequiv.eq_some_iff] at hi,
exact (this j k).resolve_left (not_not.2 hi) hk
end
lemma colp_ne_none_of_rowp_eq_none (P : partition m n) (v : fin (m + n))
(hb : P.rowp v = none) (hnb : P.colp v = none) : false :=
have hs : card (univ.image P.rowg) = m,
by rw [card_image_of_injective _ (P.injective_rowg), card_univ, card_fin],
have ht : card (univ.image P.colg) = n,
by rw [card_image_of_injective _ (P.injective_colg), card_univ, card_fin],
have hst : disjoint (univ.image P.rowg) (univ.image P.colg),
from finset.disjoint_left.2 begin
simp only [mem_image, exists_imp_distrib, not_exists],
assume v i _ hi j _ hj,
subst hi,
exact not_is_some_colp_of_is_some_rowp P (P.rowg i)
(option.is_some_iff_exists.2 ⟨i, by simp⟩)
(hj ▸ option.is_some_iff_exists.2 ⟨j, by simp⟩),
end,
have (univ.image P.rowg) ∪ (univ.image P.colg) = univ,
from eq_of_subset_of_card_le (λ _ _, mem_univ _)
(by rw [card_disjoint_union hst, hs, ht, card_univ, card_fin]),
begin
cases mem_union.1 (eq_univ_iff_forall.1 this v);
rcases mem_image.1 h with ⟨_, _, h⟩; subst h; simp * at *
end
lemma is_some_rowp_iff (P : partition m n) (j : fin (m + n)) :
(P.rowp j).is_some ↔ ¬(P.colp j).is_some :=
⟨not_is_some_colp_of_is_some_rowp P j,
by erw [option.not_is_some_iff_eq_none, ← option.ne_none_iff_is_some, forall_swap];
exact colp_ne_none_of_rowp_eq_none P j⟩
@[simp] lemma colp_rowg_eq_none (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) :
P.colp (P.rowg r) = none :=
option.not_is_some_iff_eq_none.1 ((P.is_some_rowp_iff _).1 (by simp))
@[simp] lemma rowp_colg_eq_none (P : partition m n) (s : fin n) :
P.rowp (P.colg s) = none :=
option.not_is_some_iff_eq_none.1 (mt (P.is_some_rowp_iff _).1 (by simp))
@[simp] lemma row_col_cases_on_colg {C : fin (m + n) → Sort*} (P : partition m n)
(c : fin n) (row : fin m → C (P.colg c)) (col : fin n → C (P.colg c)) :
(row_col_cases_on P (P.colg c) row col : C (P.colg c)) = col c :=
have ∀ (v' : option (fin m)) (p : option (fin m) → Prop) (h : p v') (h1 : v' = none)
(f : Π (hpn : p none), fin n),
(option.rec (λ (h : p none), col (f h)) (λ (r : fin m) (h : p (some r)), row r)
v' h : C (colg P c)) = col (f (h1 ▸ h)),
from λ v' p pv' hn f, by subst hn,
begin
convert this (P.rowp (P.colg c)) (λ x, P.rowp (P.colg c) = x) rfl (by simp)
(λ h, option.get (row_col_cases_on._proof_1 P (colg P c) h)),
erw [← option.some_inj, option.some_get, colp_colg]
end
@[simp] lemma option.get_inj {α : Type*} : Π {a b : option α} {ha : a.is_some} {hb : b.is_some},
option.get ha = option.get hb ↔ a = b
| (some a) (some b) _ _ := by rw [option.get_some, option.get_some, option.some_inj]
@[extensionality] lemma ext {P C : partition m n} (h : ∀ i, P.rowg i = C.rowg i)
(h₂ : ∀ j, P.colg j = C.colg j) : P = C :=
begin
cases P, cases C,
simp [rowg, colg, function.funext_iff] at *,
split; apply vector.ext; assumption
end
@[simp] lemma single_rowg_mul_rowp (P : partition m n) (i : fin m) :
((single (0 : fin 1) (P.rowg i)).to_matrix : matrix _ _ ℚ) ⬝
P.rowp.to_matrix = (single (0 : fin 1) i).to_matrix :=
by rw [← to_matrix_trans, single_trans_of_mem _ (rowp_rowg _ _)]
@[simp] lemma single_rowg_mul_colp (P : partition m n) (i : fin m) :
((single (0 : fin 1) (P.rowg i)).to_matrix : matrix _ _ ℚ) ⬝
P.colp.to_matrix = 0 :=
by rw [← to_matrix_trans, single_trans_of_eq_none _ (colp_rowg_eq_none _ _),
to_matrix_bot]; apply_instance
@[simp] lemma single_colg_mul_colp (P : partition m n) (k : fin n) :
((single (0 : fin 1) (P.colg k)).to_matrix : matrix _ _ ℚ) ⬝
P.colp.to_matrix = (single (0 : fin 1) k).to_matrix :=
by rw [← to_matrix_trans, single_trans_of_mem _ (colp_colg _ _)]
lemma single_colg_mul_rowp (P : partition m n) (k : fin n) :
((single (0 : fin 1) (P.colg k)).to_matrix : matrix _ _ ℚ) ⬝
P.rowp.to_matrix = 0 :=
by rw [← to_matrix_trans, single_trans_of_eq_none _ (rowp_colg_eq_none _ _),
to_matrix_bot]; apply_instance
lemma colp_symm_trans_rowp (P : partition m n) : P.colp.symm.trans P.rowp = ⊥ :=
symm_injective $ by rw [symm_trans_rev, symm_symm, rowp_symm_trans_colp, symm_bot]
@[simp] lemma colp_transpose_mul_rowp (P : partition m n) :
(P.colp.to_matrix : matrix _ _ ℚ)ᵀ ⬝ P.rowp.to_matrix = 0 :=
by rw [← to_matrix_bot, ← P.colp_symm_trans_rowp, to_matrix_trans, to_matrix_symm]
@[simp] lemma rowp_transpose_mul_colp (P : partition m n) :
(P.rowp.to_matrix : matrix _ _ ℚ)ᵀ ⬝ P.colp.to_matrix = 0 :=
by rw [← to_matrix_bot, ← P.rowp_symm_trans_colp, to_matrix_trans, to_matrix_symm]
@[simp] lemma colp_transpose_mul_colp (P : partition m n) :
(P.colp.to_matrix : matrix _ _ ℚ)ᵀ ⬝ P.colp.to_matrix = 1 :=
by rw [← to_matrix_refl, ← P.colp_trans_colp_symm, to_matrix_trans, to_matrix_symm]
@[simp] lemma rowp_transpose_mul_rowp (P : partition m n) :
(P.rowp.to_matrix : matrix _ _ ℚ)ᵀ ⬝ P.rowp.to_matrix = 1 :=
by rw [← to_matrix_refl, ← P.rowp_trans_rowp_symm, to_matrix_trans, to_matrix_symm]
lemma mul_transpose_add_mul_transpose (P : partition m n) :
(P.rowp.to_matrix ⬝ P.rowp.to_matrixᵀ : matrix _ _ ℚ) +
P.colp.to_matrix ⬝ P.colp.to_matrixᵀ = 1 :=
begin
ext,
repeat {rw [← to_matrix_symm, ← to_matrix_trans] },
simp only [add_val, pequiv.trans_symm, pequiv.to_matrix, one_val,
pequiv.mem_of_set_iff, set.mem_set_of_eq],
have := is_some_rowp_iff P j,
split_ifs; tauto
end
@[simp] lemma rowg_swap (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) (s : fin n) :
(P.swap r s).rowg r = P.colg s :=
option.some_inj.1 begin
dsimp [swap, rowg, colg, pequiv.trans],
simp
end
@[simp] lemma colg_swap (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) (s : fin n) :
(P.swap r s).colg s = P.rowg r :=
option.some_inj.1 begin
dsimp [swap, rowg, colg, pequiv.trans],
simp
end
@[simp] lemma swap_ne_self (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) (c : fin n) : (P.swap r c) ≠ P :=
mt (congr_arg (λ P : partition m n, P.rowg r)) $ by simp
lemma rowg_swap_of_ne (P : partition m n) {i r : fin m} {s : fin n} (h : i ≠ r) :
(P.swap r s).rowg i = P.rowg i :=
option.some_inj.1 begin
dsimp [swap, rowg, colg, pequiv.trans],
simp [vector.nth_update_nth_of_ne h.symm]
end
lemma colg_swap_of_ne (P : partition m n) {r : fin m} {j s : fin n} (h : j ≠ s) :
(P.swap r s).colg j = P.colg j :=
option.some_inj.1 begin
dsimp [swap, rowg, colg, pequiv.trans],
simp [vector.nth_update_nth_of_ne h.symm]
end
lemma rowg_swap' (P : partition m n) (i r : fin m) (s : fin n) :
(P.swap r s).rowg i = if i = r then P.colg s else P.rowg i :=
if hir : i = r then by simp [hir]
else by rw [if_neg hir, rowg_swap_of_ne _ hir]
lemma colg_swap' (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) (j s : fin n) :
(P.swap r s).colg j = if j = s then P.rowg r else P.colg j :=
if hjs : j = s then by simp [hjs]
else by rw [if_neg hjs, colg_swap_of_ne _ hjs]
@[simp] lemma swap_swap (P : partition m n) (r : fin m) (s : fin n) :
(P.swap r s).swap r s = P :=
by ext; intros; simp [rowg_swap', colg_swap']; split_ifs; cc
def fin.lastp : fin (m + 1 + n) := fin.cast (add_right_comm _ _ _) (fin.last (m + n))
def fin.castp (v : fin (m + n)) : fin (m + 1 + n) :=
fin.cast (add_right_comm _ _ _) (fin.cast_succ v)
@[simp] lemma fin.castp_ne_lastp (v : fin (m + n)) : (fin.lastp : fin (m + 1 + n)) ≠ fin.castp v :=
ne_of_gt v.2
@[simp] lemma fin.lastp_ne_castp (v : fin (m + n)) : fin.castp v ≠ fin.lastp :=
ne_of_lt v.2
lemma fin.injective_castp : injective (@fin.castp m n) :=
λ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩, by simp [fin.castp, fin.cast, fin.cast_le, fin.cast_lt, fin.cast_succ]
def add_row (P : partition m n) : partition (m + 1) n :=
{ row_indices := (P.row_indices.map fin.castp).append ⟨[fin.lastp], rfl⟩,
col_indices := P.col_indices.map (fin.cast (add_right_comm _ _ _) ∘ fin.cast_succ),
mem_row_indices_or_col_indices := begin
rintros ⟨v, hv⟩,
simp only [fin.cast, fin.cast_le, fin.cast_lt, fin.last, vector.to_list_map,
fin.eq_iff_veq, list.mem_map, fin.cast_le, vector.to_list_append, list.mem_append,
function.comp, fin.cast_succ, fin.cast_add, fin.exists_iff, and_comm _ (_ = _),
exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, fin.lastp, fin.castp],
by_cases hvmn : v = m + n,
{ simp [hvmn] },
{ have hv : v < m + n, from lt_of_le_of_ne (nat.le_of_lt_succ $ by simpa using hv) hvmn,
cases P.mem_row_indices_or_col_indices ⟨v, hv⟩; simp * }
end }
lemma add_row_rowg_last (P : partition m n) : P.add_row.rowg (fin.last m) = fin.lastp :=
have (fin.last m).1 = (P.row_indices.map fin.castp).to_list.length := by simp [fin.last],
option.some_inj.1 $ by simp only [add_row, rowg, vector.nth_eq_nth_le, vector.to_list_append,
(list.nth_le_nth _).symm, list.nth_concat_length, this, vector.to_list_mk]; refl
lemma add_row_rowg_cast_succ (P : partition m n) (i : fin m) :
P.add_row.rowg (fin.cast_succ i) = fin.castp (P.rowg i) :=
have i.1 < (P.row_indices.to_list.map fin.castp).length, by simp [i.2],
by simp [add_row, rowg, vector.nth_eq_nth_le, vector.to_list_append,
(list.nth_le_nth _).symm, list.nth_concat_length, vector.to_list_mk,
list.nth_le_append _ this, list.nth_le_map]
lemma add_row_colg (P : partition m n) (j : fin n) : P.add_row.colg j = fin.castp (P.colg j) :=
fin.eq_of_veq $ by simp [add_row, colg, vector.nth_eq_nth_le, fin.castp]
def dual (P : partition m n) : partition n m :=
{ row_indices := P.col_indices.map (fin.cast (add_comm _ _)),
col_indices := P.row_indices.map (fin.cast (add_comm _ _)),
mem_row_indices_or_col_indices := λ v,
(P.mem_row_indices_or_col_indices (fin.cast (add_comm _ _) v)).elim
(λ h, or.inr begin
simp only [vector.to_list_map, list.mem_map],
use fin.cast (add_comm _ _) v,
simp [fin.eq_iff_veq, h],
end)
(λ h, or.inl begin
simp only [vector.to_list_map, list.mem_map],
use fin.cast (add_comm _ _) v,
simp [fin.eq_iff_veq, h],
end) }
@[simp] lemma dual_dual (P : partition m n) : P.dual.dual = P :=
by cases P; simp [dual]; split; ext; simp [fin.eq_iff_veq]
end partition
|
0b28a187752135dbe0e45e55a8956b5759e76ba3 | 19cc34575500ee2e3d4586c15544632aa07a8e66 | /src/analysis/calculus/fderiv.lean | 9e92ff11bb4caf8e8b5fbbff25983aaa4d5e6c02 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | LibertasSpZ/mathlib | b9fcd46625eb940611adb5e719a4b554138dade6 | 33f7870a49d7cc06d2f3036e22543e6ec5046e68 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,066,539,347 | 1,602,429,158,000 | 1,602,429,158,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 115,057 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.calculus.tangent_cone
import analysis.normed_space.units
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`has_fderiv_at f f' x := has_fderiv_within_at f f' x univ`
Finally,
`has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_at` twice: first for `has_fderiv_at`, then for
`has_strict_fderiv_at`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative, this file contains the
usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps
* bounded bilinear maps
* sum of two functions
* sum of finitely many functions
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant
* negative of a function
* subtraction of two functions
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function
* multiplication of two scalar functions
* composition of functions (the chain rule)
* inverse function (assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `has_deriv_at`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : differentiable ℝ (λ x, sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : differentiable_at ℝ (λ x, exp x / (1 + sin x)) x :=
by simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `analysis.special_functions.trigonometric`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `is_o` relation, but also
characterized in terms of the `tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `differentiable_at 𝕜 f x`,
`differentiable_on 𝕜 f s` and `differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `unique_diff_within_at s x` and
`unique_diff_on s`, defined in `tangent_cone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(λ x, exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`tests/differentiable.lean`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open filter asymptotics continuous_linear_map set metric
open_locale topological_space classical nnreal
noncomputable theory
section
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
variables {G : Type*} [normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
variables {G' : Type*} [normed_group G'] [normed_space 𝕜 G']
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `has_fderiv_at`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `has_fderiv_within_at`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
def has_fderiv_at_filter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : filter E) :=
is_o (λ x', f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) (λ x', x' - x) L
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
def has_fderiv_within_at (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : set E) (x : E) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
def has_fderiv_at (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
def has_strict_fderiv_at (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
is_o (λ p : E × E, f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) (λ p : E × E, p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (x, x))
variables (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
def differentiable_within_at (f : E → F) (s : set E) (x : E) :=
∃f' : E →L[𝕜] F, has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
def differentiable_at (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃f' : E →L[𝕜] F, has_fderiv_at f f' x
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. -/
def fderiv_within (f : E → F) (s : set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if h : ∃f', has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x then classical.some h else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if h : ∃f', has_fderiv_at f f' x then classical.some h else 0
/-- `differentiable_on 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
def differentiable_on (f : E → F) (s : set E) :=
∀x ∈ s, differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x
/-- `differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
def differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀x, differentiable_at 𝕜 f x
variables {𝕜}
variables {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variables {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variables (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variables {x : E}
variables {s t : set E}
variables {L L₁ L₂ : filter E}
lemma fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at
(h : ¬ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) : fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x = 0 :=
have ¬ ∃ f', has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x, from h,
by simp [fderiv_within, this]
lemma fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at (h : ¬ differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 :=
have ¬ ∃ f', has_fderiv_at f f' x, from h,
by simp [fderiv, this]
section derivative_uniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `unique_diff_within_at` and `unique_diff_on` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f', i.e.,
`n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity and
`c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.lim (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : tendsto (λ n, ∥c n∥) l at_top)
(cdlim : tendsto (λ n, c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
tendsto (λn, c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
begin
have tendsto_arg : tendsto (λ n, x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x),
{ conv in (𝓝[s] x) { rw ← add_zero x },
rw [nhds_within, tendsto_inf],
split,
{ apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangent_cone_at.lim_zero l clim cdlim) },
{ rwa tendsto_principal } },
have : is_o (λ y, f y - f x - f' (y - x)) (λ y, y - x) (𝓝[s] x) := h,
have : is_o (λ n, f (x + d n) - f x - f' ((x + d n) - x)) (λ n, (x + d n) - x) l :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg,
have : is_o (λ n, f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) d l := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel'],
have : is_o (λn, c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) (λn, c n • d n) l :=
(is_O_refl c l).smul_is_o this,
have : is_o (λn, c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) (λn, (1:ℝ)) l :=
this.trans_is_O (is_O_one_of_tendsto ℝ cdlim),
have L1 : tendsto (λn, c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(is_o_one_iff ℝ).1 this,
have L2 : tendsto (λn, f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuous_at cdlim,
have L3 : tendsto (λn, (c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)))
l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2,
have : (λn, (c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)))
= (λn, c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)),
by { ext n, simp [smul_add, smul_sub] },
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
end
/-- `unique_diff_within_at` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem unique_diff_within_at.eq (H : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (h₁ : has_fderiv_within_at f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
begin
have A : ∀y ∈ tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x, f' y = f₁' y,
{ rintros y ⟨c, d, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩,
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h.lim at_top dtop clim cdlim) (h₁.lim at_top dtop clim cdlim) },
have B : ∀y ∈ submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x), f' y = f₁' y,
{ assume y hy,
apply submodule.span_induction hy,
{ exact λy hy, A y hy },
{ simp only [continuous_linear_map.map_zero] },
{ simp {contextual := tt} },
{ simp {contextual := tt} } },
have C : ∀y ∈ closure ((submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x)) : set E), f' y = f₁' y,
{ assume y hy,
let K := {y | f' y = f₁' y},
have : (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x) : set E) ⊆ K := B,
have : closure (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x) : set E) ⊆ closure K :=
closure_mono this,
have : y ∈ closure K := this hy,
rwa (is_closed_eq f'.continuous f₁'.continuous).closure_eq at this },
rw H.1 at C,
ext y,
exact C y (mem_univ _)
end
theorem unique_diff_on.eq (H : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s)
(h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (h₁ : has_fderiv_within_at f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
unique_diff_within_at.eq (H x hx) h h₁
end derivative_uniqueness
section fderiv_properties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥) L (𝓝 0) :=
have h : ∀ x', ∥x' - x∥ = 0 → ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥ = 0, from λ x' hx',
by { rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')], simp },
begin
unfold has_fderiv_at_filter,
rw [←is_o_norm_left, ←is_o_norm_right, is_o_iff_tendsto h],
exact tendsto_congr (λ _, div_eq_inv_mul),
end
theorem has_fderiv_within_at_iff_tendsto : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_fderiv_at_iff_tendsto : has_fderiv_at f f' x ↔
tendsto (λ x', ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_iff_tendsto
theorem has_fderiv_at_iff_is_o_nhds_zero : has_fderiv_at f f' x ↔
is_o (λh, f (x + h) - f x - f' h) (λh, h) (𝓝 0) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H,
have : tendsto (λ (z : E), z + x) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 (0 + x)),
from tendsto_id.add tendsto_const_nhds,
rw [zero_add] at this,
refine (H.comp_tendsto this).congr _ _;
intro z; simp only [function.comp, add_sub_cancel', add_comm z] },
{ assume H,
have : tendsto (λ (z : E), z - x) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (x - x)),
from tendsto_id.sub tendsto_const_nhds,
rw [sub_self] at this,
refine (H.comp_tendsto this).congr _ _;
intro z; simp only [function.comp, add_sub_cancel'_right] }
end
/-- Converse to the mean value inequality: if `f` is differentiable at `x₀` and `C`-lipschitz
on a neighborhood of `x₀` then it its derivative at `x₀` has norm bounded by `C`. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at.le_of_lip {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {x₀ : E} (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x₀)
{s : set E} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x₀) {C : ℝ≥0} (hlip : lipschitz_on_with C f s) : ∥f'∥ ≤ C :=
begin
replace hf : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ∥x' - x₀∥ < δ → ∥x' - x₀∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x₀ - f' (x' - x₀)∥ < ε,
by simpa [has_fderiv_at_iff_tendsto, normed_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds] using hf,
obtain ⟨ε, ε_pos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε > 0, ball x₀ ε ⊆ s := mem_nhds_iff.mp hs,
apply real.le_of_forall_epsilon_le,
intros η η_pos,
rcases hf η η_pos with ⟨δ, δ_pos, h⟩, clear hf,
apply op_norm_le_of_ball (lt_min ε_pos δ_pos) (by linarith [C.coe_nonneg]: (0 : ℝ) ≤ C + η),
intros u u_in,
let x := x₀ + u,
rw show u = x - x₀, by rw [add_sub_cancel'],
have xε : x ∈ ball x₀ ε,
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using ball_subset_ball (min_le_left ε δ) u_in,
have xδ : ∥x - x₀∥ < δ,
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using ball_subset_ball (min_le_right ε δ) u_in,
replace h : ∥f x - f x₀ - f' (x - x₀)∥ ≤ η*∥x - x₀∥,
{ by_cases H : x - x₀ = 0,
{ simp [eq_of_sub_eq_zero H] },
{ exact (inv_mul_le_iff' $ norm_pos_iff.mpr H).mp (le_of_lt $ h x xδ) } },
have := hlip.norm_sub_le (hε xε) (hε $ mem_ball_self ε_pos),
calc ∥f' (x - x₀)∥ ≤ ∥f x - f x₀∥ + ∥f x - f x₀ - f' (x - x₀)∥ : norm_le_insert _ _
... ≤ (C + η) * ∥x - x₀∥ : by linarith,
end
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.mono (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L₁ :=
h.mono hst
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.mono (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x :=
h.mono (nhds_within_mono _ hst)
theorem has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_at_filter (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
theorem has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_within_at
(h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x :=
h.has_fderiv_at_filter inf_le_left
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.differentiable_within_at (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
lemma has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp] lemma has_fderiv_within_at_univ :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' univ x ↔ has_fderiv_at f f' x :=
by { simp only [has_fderiv_within_at, nhds_within_univ], refl }
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.is_O_sub (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
is_O (λ p : E × E, f p.1 - f p.2) (λ p : E × E, p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (x, x)) :=
hf.is_O.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.is_O_comp _ _)
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.is_O_sub (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
is_O (λ x', f x' - f x) (λ x', x' - x) L :=
h.is_O.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.is_O_sub _ _)
protected lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_at (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at f f' x :=
begin
rw [has_fderiv_at, has_fderiv_at_filter, is_o_iff],
exact (λ c hc, tendsto_id.prod_mk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds (is_o_iff.1 hf hc))
end
protected lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.differentiable_at (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
hf.has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at
/-- Directional derivative agrees with `has_fderiv`. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at.lim (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (v : E) {α : Type*} {c : α → 𝕜}
{l : filter α} (hc : tendsto (λ n, ∥c n∥) l at_top) :
tendsto (λ n, (c n) • (f (x + (c n)⁻¹ • v) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
begin
refine (has_fderiv_within_at_univ.2 hf).lim _ (univ_mem_sets' (λ _, trivial)) hc _,
assume U hU,
refine (eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top hc (0:𝕜)).mono (λ y hy, _),
convert mem_of_nhds hU,
dsimp only,
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel hy, one_smul]
end
theorem has_fderiv_at_unique
(h₀ : has_fderiv_at f f₀' x) (h₁ : has_fderiv_at f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' :=
begin
rw ← has_fderiv_within_at_univ at h₀ h₁,
exact unique_diff_within_at_univ.eq h₀ h₁
end
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x :=
by simp [has_fderiv_within_at, nhds_within_restrict'' s h]
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x :=
by simp [has_fderiv_within_at, nhds_within_restrict' s h]
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.union (hs : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (ht : has_fderiv_within_at f f' t x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' (s ∪ t) x :=
begin
simp only [has_fderiv_within_at, nhds_within_union],
exact hs.join ht,
end
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.nhds_within (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x)
(ht : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : has_fderiv_within_at f f' t x :=
(has_fderiv_within_at_inter' ht).1 (h.mono (inter_subset_right _ _))
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.has_fderiv_at (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
has_fderiv_at f f' x :=
by rwa [← univ_inter s, has_fderiv_within_at_inter hs, has_fderiv_within_at_univ] at h
lemma differentiable_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x) s x :=
begin
dunfold fderiv_within,
dunfold differentiable_within_at at h,
rw dif_pos h,
exact classical.some_spec h
end
lemma differentiable_at.has_fderiv_at (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
has_fderiv_at f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x :=
begin
dunfold fderiv,
dunfold differentiable_at at h,
rw dif_pos h,
exact classical.some_spec h
end
lemma has_fderiv_at.fderiv (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = f' :=
by { ext, rw has_fderiv_at_unique h h.differentiable_at.has_fderiv_at }
/-- Converse to the mean value inequality: if `f` is differentiable at `x₀` and `C`-lipschitz
on a neighborhood of `x₀` then it its derivative at `x₀` has norm bounded by `C`.
Version using `fderiv`. -/
lemma fderiv_at.le_of_lip {f : E → F} {x₀ : E} (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x₀)
{s : set E} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x₀) {C : ℝ≥0} (hlip : lipschitz_on_with C f s) : ∥fderiv 𝕜 f x₀∥ ≤ C :=
hf.has_fderiv_at.le_of_lip hs hlip
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within
(h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x = f' :=
(hxs.eq h h.differentiable_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at).symm
/-- If `x` is not in the closure of `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_of_not_mem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) :
has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x :=
begin
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot, ne_bot] at h,
simp [has_fderiv_within_at, has_fderiv_at_filter, h, is_o, is_O_with],
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.mono (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f t x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨f', hf'⟩,
exact ⟨f', hf'.mono st⟩
end
lemma differentiable_within_at_univ :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f univ x ↔ differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
by simp only [differentiable_within_at, has_fderiv_within_at_univ, differentiable_at]
lemma differentiable_within_at_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
by simp only [differentiable_within_at, has_fderiv_within_at, has_fderiv_at_filter,
nhds_within_restrict' s ht]
lemma differentiable_within_at_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
by simp only [differentiable_within_at, has_fderiv_within_at, has_fderiv_at_filter,
nhds_within_restrict'' s ht]
lemma differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at
(h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
(differentiable_within_at_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
lemma differentiable.differentiable_at (h : differentiable 𝕜 f) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
h x
lemma differentiable_within_at.differentiable_at
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
h.imp (λ f' hf', hf'.has_fderiv_at hs)
lemma differentiable_at.fderiv_within
(h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ hxs,
exact h.has_fderiv_at.has_fderiv_within_at
end
lemma differentiable_on.mono (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
λx hx, (h x (st hx)).mono st
lemma differentiable_on_univ :
differentiable_on 𝕜 f univ ↔ differentiable 𝕜 f :=
by { simp [differentiable_on, differentiable_within_at_univ], refl }
lemma differentiable.differentiable_on (h : differentiable 𝕜 f) : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
(differentiable_on_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
lemma differentiable_on_of_locally_differentiable_on
(h : ∀x∈s, ∃u, is_open u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ differentiable_on 𝕜 f (s ∩ u)) : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
begin
assume x xs,
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩,
exact (differentiable_within_at_inter (mem_nhds_sets t_open xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
end
lemma fderiv_within_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f t x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f t x :=
((differentiable_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at h).mono st).fderiv_within ht
@[simp] lemma fderiv_within_univ : fderiv_within 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f :=
begin
ext x : 1,
by_cases h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x,
{ apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ unique_diff_within_at_univ,
rw has_fderiv_within_at_univ,
apply h.has_fderiv_at },
{ have : ¬ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f univ x,
by contrapose! h; rwa ← differentiable_within_at_univ,
rw [fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at h,
fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at this] }
end
lemma fderiv_within_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
begin
by_cases h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x,
{ apply fderiv_within_subset (inter_subset_left _ _) _ ((differentiable_within_at_inter ht).1 h),
apply hs.inter ht },
{ have : ¬ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x,
by contrapose! h; rw differentiable_within_at_inter; assumption,
rw [fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at h,
fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at this] }
end
lemma fderiv_within_of_open (hs : is_open s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
begin
have : s = univ ∩ s, by simp only [univ_inter],
rw [this, ← fderiv_within_univ],
exact fderiv_within_inter (mem_nhds_sets hs hx) (unique_diff_on_univ _ (mem_univ _))
end
lemma fderiv_within_eq_fderiv (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
begin
rw ← fderiv_within_univ,
exact fderiv_within_subset (subset_univ _) hs h.differentiable_within_at
end
end fderiv_properties
section continuous
/-! ### Deducing continuity from differentiability -/
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds
(hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
tendsto f L (𝓝 (f x)) :=
begin
have : tendsto (λ x', f x' - f x) L (𝓝 0),
{ refine h.is_O_sub.trans_tendsto (tendsto.mono_left _ hL),
rw ← sub_self x, exact tendsto_id.sub tendsto_const_nhds },
have := tendsto.add this tendsto_const_nhds,
rw zero_add (f x) at this,
exact this.congr (by simp)
end
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.continuous_within_at
(h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds inf_le_left h
theorem has_fderiv_at.continuous_at (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
continuous_at f x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.tendsto_nhds (le_refl _) h
lemma differentiable_within_at.continuous_within_at (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
continuous_within_at f s x :=
let ⟨f', hf'⟩ := h in hf'.continuous_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.continuous_at (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) : continuous_at f x :=
let ⟨f', hf'⟩ := h in hf'.continuous_at
lemma differentiable_on.continuous_on (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) : continuous_on f s :=
λx hx, (h x hx).continuous_within_at
lemma differentiable.continuous (h : differentiable 𝕜 f) : continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λx, (h x).continuous_at
protected lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.continuous_at (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
continuous_at f x :=
hf.has_fderiv_at.continuous_at
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.is_O_sub_rev {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F}
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) x) :
is_O (λ p : E × E, p.1 - p.2) (λ p : E × E, f p.1 - f p.2) (𝓝 (x, x)) :=
((f'.is_O_comp_rev _ _).trans (hf.trans_is_O (f'.is_O_comp_rev _ _)).right_is_O_add).congr
(λ _, rfl) (λ _, sub_add_cancel _ _)
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.is_O_sub_rev {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F}
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) x L) :
is_O (λ x', x' - x) (λ x', f x' - f x) L :=
((f'.is_O_sub_rev _ _).trans (hf.trans_is_O (f'.is_O_sub_rev _ _)).right_is_O_add).congr
(λ _, rfl) (λ _, sub_add_cancel _ _)
end continuous
section congr
/-! ### congr properties of the derivative -/
theorem filter.eventually_eq.has_strict_fderiv_at_iff
(h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) (h' : ∀ y, f₀' y = f₁' y) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f₀ f₀' x ↔ has_strict_fderiv_at f₁ f₁' x :=
begin
refine is_o_congr ((h.prod_mk_nhds h).mono _) (eventually_of_forall $ λ _, rfl),
rintros p ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩,
simp only [*]
end
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.congr_of_eventually_eq (h : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x)
(h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) : has_strict_fderiv_at f₁ f' x :=
(h₁.has_strict_fderiv_at_iff (λ _, rfl)).1 h
theorem filter.eventually_eq.has_fderiv_at_filter_iff
(h₀ : f₀ =ᶠ[L] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) (h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ has_fderiv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L :=
is_o_congr (h₀.mono $ λ y hy, by simp only [hy, h₁, hx]) (eventually_of_forall $ λ _, rfl)
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.congr_of_eventually_eq (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L)
(hL : f₁ =ᶠ[L] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_fderiv_at_filter f₁ f' x L :=
(hL.has_fderiv_at_filter_iff hx $ λ _, rfl).2 h
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.congr_mono (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (ht : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : has_fderiv_within_at f₁ f' t x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.congr_of_eventually_eq (h.mono h₁) (filter.mem_inf_sets_of_right ht) hx
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.congr (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hs : ∀x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_fderiv_within_at f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (subset.refl _)
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : has_fderiv_within_at f₁ f' s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.congr_of_eventually_eq h h₁ hx
lemma has_fderiv_at.congr_of_eventually_eq (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) : has_fderiv_at f₁ f' x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.congr_of_eventually_eq h h₁ (mem_of_nhds h₁ : _)
lemma differentiable_within_at.congr_mono (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(ht : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₁ t x :=
(has_fderiv_within_at.congr_mono h.has_fderiv_within_at ht hx h₁).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_within_at.congr (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(ht : ∀x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
differentiable_within_at.congr_mono h ht hx (subset.refl _)
lemma differentiable_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq h₁ hx).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_on.congr_mono (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (h' : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(h₁ : t ⊆ s) : differentiable_on 𝕜 f₁ t :=
λ x hx, (h x (h₁ hx)).congr_mono h' (h' x hx) h₁
lemma differentiable_on.congr (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (h' : ∀x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 f₁ s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).congr h' (h' x hx)
lemma differentiable_on_congr (h' : ∀x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 f₁ s ↔ differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
⟨λ h, differentiable_on.congr h (λy hy, (h' y hy).symm),
λ h, differentiable_on.congr h h'⟩
lemma differentiable_at.congr_of_eventually_eq (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 f₁ x :=
has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at
(has_fderiv_at_filter.congr_of_eventually_eq h.has_fderiv_at hL (mem_of_nhds hL : _))
lemma differentiable_within_at.fderiv_within_congr_mono (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : ∀x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (hxt : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 t x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f₁ t x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
(has_fderiv_within_at.congr_mono h.has_fderiv_within_at hs hx h₁).fderiv_within hxt
lemma filter.eventually_eq.fderiv_within_eq (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
if h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x
then has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within (h.has_fderiv_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq hL hx) hs
else
have h' : ¬ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₁ s x,
from mt (λ h, h.congr_of_eventually_eq (hL.mono $ λ x, eq.symm) hx.symm) h,
by rw [fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at h,
fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at h']
lemma fderiv_within_congr (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hL : ∀y∈s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
begin
apply filter.eventually_eq.fderiv_within_eq hs _ hx,
apply mem_sets_of_superset self_mem_nhds_within,
exact hL
end
lemma filter.eventually_eq.fderiv_eq (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
fderiv 𝕜 f₁ x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
begin
have A : f₁ x = f x := hL.eq_of_nhds,
rw [← fderiv_within_univ, ← fderiv_within_univ],
rw ← nhds_within_univ at hL,
exact hL.fderiv_within_eq unique_diff_within_at_univ A
end
end congr
section id
/-! ### Derivative of the identity -/
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at_id (x : E) :
has_strict_fderiv_at id (id 𝕜 E) x :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ by simp
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_id (x : E) (L : filter E) :
has_fderiv_at_filter id (id 𝕜 E) x L :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ by simp
theorem has_fderiv_within_at_id (x : E) (s : set E) :
has_fderiv_within_at id (id 𝕜 E) s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_id _ _
theorem has_fderiv_at_id (x : E) : has_fderiv_at id (id 𝕜 E) x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_id _ _
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at_id : differentiable_at 𝕜 id x :=
(has_fderiv_at_id x).differentiable_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at_id' : differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ x, x) x :=
(has_fderiv_at_id x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at_id : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 id s x :=
differentiable_at_id.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_id : differentiable 𝕜 (id : E → E) :=
λx, differentiable_at_id
@[simp] lemma differentiable_id' : differentiable 𝕜 (λ (x : E), x) :=
λx, differentiable_at_id
lemma differentiable_on_id : differentiable_on 𝕜 id s :=
differentiable_id.differentiable_on
lemma fderiv_id : fderiv 𝕜 id x = id 𝕜 E :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (has_fderiv_at_id x)
@[simp] lemma fderiv_id' : fderiv 𝕜 (λ (x : E), x) x = continuous_linear_map.id 𝕜 E :=
fderiv_id
lemma fderiv_within_id (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 id s x = id 𝕜 E :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within (differentiable_at_id) hxs,
exact fderiv_id
end
lemma fderiv_within_id' (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ (x : E), x) s x = continuous_linear_map.id 𝕜 E :=
fderiv_within_id hxs
end id
section const
/-! ### derivative of a constant function -/
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at_const (c : F) (x : E) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ _, c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ λ _, by simp only [zero_apply, sub_self]
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_const (c : F) (x : E) (L : filter E) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ λ _, by simp only [zero_apply, sub_self]
theorem has_fderiv_within_at_const (c : F) (x : E) (s : set E) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_const _ _ _
theorem has_fderiv_at_const (c : F) (x : E) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_const _ _ _
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at_const (c : F) : differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx, c) x :=
⟨0, has_fderiv_at_const c x⟩
lemma differentiable_within_at_const (c : F) : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx, c) s x :=
differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at (differentiable_at_const _)
lemma fderiv_const_apply (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (λy, c) x = 0 :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (has_fderiv_at_const c x)
@[simp] lemma fderiv_const (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (λ (y : E), c) = 0 :=
by { ext m, rw fderiv_const_apply, refl }
lemma fderiv_within_const_apply (c : F) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, c) s x = 0 :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within (differentiable_at_const _) hxs,
exact fderiv_const_apply _
end
@[simp] lemma differentiable_const (c : F) : differentiable 𝕜 (λx : E, c) :=
λx, differentiable_at_const _
lemma differentiable_on_const (c : F) : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx, c) s :=
(differentiable_const _).differentiable_on
end const
section continuous_linear_map
/-!
### Continuous linear maps
There are currently two variants of these in mathlib, the bundled version
(named `continuous_linear_map`, and denoted `E →L[𝕜] F`), and the unbundled version (with a
predicate `is_bounded_linear_map`). We give statements for both versions. -/
protected theorem continuous_linear_map.has_strict_fderiv_at {x : E} :
has_strict_fderiv_at e e x :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ λ x, by simp only [e.map_sub, sub_self]
protected lemma continuous_linear_map.has_fderiv_at_filter :
has_fderiv_at_filter e e x L :=
(is_o_zero _ _).congr_left $ λ x, by simp only [e.map_sub, sub_self]
protected lemma continuous_linear_map.has_fderiv_within_at : has_fderiv_within_at e e s x :=
e.has_fderiv_at_filter
protected lemma continuous_linear_map.has_fderiv_at : has_fderiv_at e e x :=
e.has_fderiv_at_filter
@[simp] protected lemma continuous_linear_map.differentiable_at : differentiable_at 𝕜 e x :=
e.has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at
protected lemma continuous_linear_map.differentiable_within_at : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 e s x :=
e.differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at
protected lemma continuous_linear_map.fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 e x = e :=
e.has_fderiv_at.fderiv
protected lemma continuous_linear_map.fderiv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 e s x = e :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within e.differentiable_at hxs,
exact e.fderiv
end
@[simp]protected lemma continuous_linear_map.differentiable : differentiable 𝕜 e :=
λx, e.differentiable_at
protected lemma continuous_linear_map.differentiable_on : differentiable_on 𝕜 e s :=
e.differentiable.differentiable_on
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.has_fderiv_at_filter (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
has_fderiv_at_filter f h.to_continuous_linear_map x L :=
h.to_continuous_linear_map.has_fderiv_at_filter
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.has_fderiv_within_at (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
has_fderiv_within_at f h.to_continuous_linear_map s x :=
h.has_fderiv_at_filter
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.has_fderiv_at (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
has_fderiv_at f h.to_continuous_linear_map x :=
h.has_fderiv_at_filter
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.differentiable_at (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
h.has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.differentiable_within_at (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
h.differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.fderiv (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
fderiv 𝕜 f x = h.to_continuous_linear_map :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (h.has_fderiv_at)
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.fderiv_within (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) : fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x = h.to_continuous_linear_map :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within h.differentiable_at hxs,
exact h.fderiv
end
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.differentiable (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
differentiable 𝕜 f :=
λx, h.differentiable_at
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.differentiable_on (h : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
h.differentiable.differentiable_on
end continuous_linear_map
section composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of two functions
For composition lemmas, we put x explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition -/
variable (x)
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_at_filter g g' (f x) (L.map f))
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L :=
let eq₁ := (g'.is_O_comp _ _).trans_is_o hf in
let eq₂ := (hg.comp_tendsto tendsto_map).trans_is_O hf.is_O_sub in
by { refine eq₂.triangle (eq₁.congr_left (λ x', _)), simp }
/- A readable version of the previous theorem,
a general form of the chain rule. -/
example {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_at_filter g g' (f x) (L.map f))
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L :=
begin
unfold has_fderiv_at_filter at hg,
have : is_o (λ x', g (f x') - g (f x) - g' (f x' - f x)) (λ x', f x' - f x) L,
from hg.comp_tendsto (le_refl _),
have eq₁ : is_o (λ x', g (f x') - g (f x) - g' (f x' - f x)) (λ x', x' - x) L,
from this.trans_is_O hf.is_O_sub,
have eq₂ : is_o (λ x', f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) (λ x', x' - x) L,
from hf,
have : is_O
(λ x', g' (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x))) (λ x', f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) L,
from g'.is_O_comp _ _,
have : is_o (λ x', g' (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x))) (λ x', x' - x) L,
from this.trans_is_o eq₂,
have eq₃ : is_o (λ x', g' (f x' - f x) - (g' (f' (x' - x)))) (λ x', x' - x) L,
by { refine this.congr_left _, simp},
exact eq₁.triangle eq₃
end
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {t : set F}
(hg : has_fderiv_within_at g g' t (f x)) (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hst : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
has_fderiv_within_at (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_at_filter.comp _ (has_fderiv_at_filter.mono hg _) hf,
calc map f (𝓝[s] x)
≤ 𝓝[f '' s] (f x) : hf.continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image
... ≤ 𝓝[t] (f x) : nhds_within_mono _ (image_subset_iff.mpr hst)
end
/-- The chain rule. -/
theorem has_fderiv_at.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_at g g' (f x)) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x :=
(hg.mono hf.continuous_at).comp x hf
theorem has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : has_fderiv_at g g' (f x)) (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
begin
rw ← has_fderiv_within_at_univ at hg,
exact has_fderiv_within_at.comp x hg hf subset_preimage_univ
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.comp {g : F → G} {t : set F}
(hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(h : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x :=
begin
rcases hf with ⟨f', hf'⟩,
rcases hg with ⟨g', hg'⟩,
exact ⟨continuous_linear_map.comp g' f', hg'.comp x hf' h⟩
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.comp' {g : F → G} {t : set F}
(hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp x (hf.mono (inter_subset_left _ _)) (inter_subset_right _ _)
lemma differentiable_at.comp {g : F → G}
(hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x :=
(hg.has_fderiv_at.comp x hf.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at.comp_differentiable_within_at {g : F → G}
(hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x :=
(differentiable_within_at_univ.2 hg).comp x hf (by simp)
lemma fderiv_within.comp {g : F → G} {t : set F}
(hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(h : maps_to f s t) (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderiv_within 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x) :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ hxs,
exact has_fderiv_within_at.comp x (hg.has_fderiv_within_at) (hf.has_fderiv_within_at) h
end
lemma fderiv.comp {g : F → G}
(hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x = (fderiv 𝕜 g (f x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_at.fderiv,
exact has_fderiv_at.comp x hg.has_fderiv_at hf.has_fderiv_at
end
lemma fderiv.comp_fderiv_within {g : F → G}
(hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderiv 𝕜 g (f x)).comp (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x) :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ hxs,
exact has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x (hg.has_fderiv_at) (hf.has_fderiv_within_at)
end
lemma differentiable_on.comp {g : F → G} {t : set F}
(hg : differentiable_on 𝕜 g t) (hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (st : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s :=
λx hx, differentiable_within_at.comp x (hg (f x) (st hx)) (hf x hx) st
lemma differentiable.comp {g : F → G} (hg : differentiable 𝕜 g) (hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) :
differentiable 𝕜 (g ∘ f) :=
λx, differentiable_at.comp x (hg (f x)) (hf x)
lemma differentiable.comp_differentiable_on {g : F → G} (hg : differentiable 𝕜 g)
(hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s :=
(differentiable_on_univ.2 hg).comp hf (by simp)
/-- The chain rule for derivatives in the sense of strict differentiability. -/
protected lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : has_strict_fderiv_at g g' (f x)) (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, g (f x)) (g'.comp f') x :=
((hg.comp_tendsto (hf.continuous_at.prod_map' hf.continuous_at)).trans_is_O hf.is_O_sub).triangle $
by simpa only [g'.map_sub, f'.coe_comp'] using (g'.is_O_comp _ _).trans_is_o hf
protected lemma differentiable.iterate {f : E → E} (hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) (n : ℕ) :
differentiable 𝕜 (f^[n]) :=
nat.rec_on n differentiable_id (λ n ihn, ihn.comp hf)
protected lemma differentiable_on.iterate {f : E → E} (hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s)
(hs : maps_to f s s) (n : ℕ) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (f^[n]) s :=
nat.rec_on n differentiable_on_id (λ n ihn, ihn.comp hf hs)
variable {x}
protected lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (hL : tendsto f L L) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (f^[n]) (f'^n) x L :=
begin
induction n with n ihn,
{ exact has_fderiv_at_filter_id x L },
{ change has_fderiv_at_filter (f^[n] ∘ f) (f'^(n+1)) x L,
rw [pow_succ'],
refine has_fderiv_at_filter.comp x _ hf,
rw hx,
exact ihn.mono hL }
end
protected lemma has_fderiv_at.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
has_fderiv_at (f^[n]) (f'^n) x :=
begin
refine hf.iterate _ hx n,
convert hf.continuous_at,
exact hx.symm
end
protected lemma has_fderiv_within_at.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hx : f x = x) (hs : maps_to f s s) (n : ℕ) :
has_fderiv_within_at (f^[n]) (f'^n) s x :=
begin
refine hf.iterate _ hx n,
convert tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hf.continuous_within_at, _⟩,
exacts [hx.symm, (tendsto_principal_principal.2 hs).mono_left inf_le_right]
end
protected lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (f^[n]) (f'^n) x :=
begin
induction n with n ihn,
{ exact has_strict_fderiv_at_id x },
{ change has_strict_fderiv_at (f^[n] ∘ f) (f'^(n+1)) x,
rw [pow_succ'],
refine has_strict_fderiv_at.comp x _ hf,
rwa hx }
end
protected lemma differentiable_at.iterate {f : E → E} (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x)
(hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (f^[n]) x :=
exists.elim hf $ λ f' hf, (hf.iterate hx n).differentiable_at
protected lemma differentiable_within_at.iterate {f : E → E} (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x)
(hx : f x = x) (hs : maps_to f s s) (n : ℕ) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (f^[n]) s x :=
exists.elim hf $ λ f' hf, (hf.iterate hx hs n).differentiable_within_at
end composition
section cartesian_product
/-! ### Derivative of the cartesian product of two functions -/
section prod
variables {f₂ : E → G} {f₂' : E →L[𝕜] G}
protected lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.prod
(hf₁ : has_strict_fderiv_at f₁ f₁' x) (hf₂ : has_strict_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λx, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁'.prod f₂') x :=
hf₁.prod_left hf₂
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.prod
(hf₁ : has_fderiv_at_filter f₁ f₁' x L) (hf₂ : has_fderiv_at_filter f₂ f₂' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λx, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁'.prod f₂') x L :=
hf₁.prod_left hf₂
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.prod
(hf₁ : has_fderiv_within_at f₁ f₁' s x) (hf₂ : has_fderiv_within_at f₂ f₂' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λx, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (f₁'.prod f₂') s x :=
hf₁.prod hf₂
lemma has_fderiv_at.prod (hf₁ : has_fderiv_at f₁ f₁' x) (hf₂ : has_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λx, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) (continuous_linear_map.prod f₁' f₂') x :=
hf₁.prod hf₂
lemma differentiable_within_at.prod
(hf₁ : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₁ s x) (hf₂ : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₂ s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s x :=
(hf₁.has_fderiv_within_at.prod hf₂.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
@[simp]
lemma differentiable_at.prod (hf₁ : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₁ x) (hf₂ : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₂ x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) x :=
(hf₁.has_fderiv_at.prod hf₂.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.prod (hf₁ : differentiable_on 𝕜 f₁ s) (hf₂ : differentiable_on 𝕜 f₂ s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s :=
λx hx, differentiable_within_at.prod (hf₁ x hx) (hf₂ x hx)
@[simp]
lemma differentiable.prod (hf₁ : differentiable 𝕜 f₁) (hf₂ : differentiable 𝕜 f₂) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) :=
λ x, differentiable_at.prod (hf₁ x) (hf₂ x)
lemma differentiable_at.fderiv_prod
(hf₁ : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₁ x) (hf₂ : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₂ x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) x = (fderiv 𝕜 f₁ x).prod (fderiv 𝕜 f₂ x) :=
(hf₁.has_fderiv_at.prod hf₂.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
lemma differentiable_at.fderiv_within_prod
(hf₁ : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₁ s x) (hf₂ : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₂ s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λx:E, (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s x =
(fderiv_within 𝕜 f₁ s x).prod (fderiv_within 𝕜 f₂ s x) :=
begin
apply has_fderiv_within_at.fderiv_within _ hxs,
exact has_fderiv_within_at.prod hf₁.has_fderiv_within_at hf₂.has_fderiv_within_at
end
end prod
section fst
variables {f₂ : E → F × G} {f₂' : E →L[𝕜] F × G} {p : E × F}
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_fst : has_strict_fderiv_at prod.fst (fst 𝕜 E F) p :=
(fst 𝕜 E F).has_strict_fderiv_at
protected lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.fst (h : has_strict_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, (f₂ x).1) ((fst 𝕜 F G).comp f₂') x :=
has_strict_fderiv_at_fst.comp x h
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter_fst {L : filter (E × F)} :
has_fderiv_at_filter prod.fst (fst 𝕜 E F) p L :=
(fst 𝕜 E F).has_fderiv_at_filter
protected lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.fst (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f₂ f₂' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, (f₂ x).1) ((fst 𝕜 F G).comp f₂') x L :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_fst.comp x h
lemma has_fderiv_at_fst : has_fderiv_at prod.fst (fst 𝕜 E F) p :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_fst
protected lemma has_fderiv_at.fst (h : has_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, (f₂ x).1) ((fst 𝕜 F G).comp f₂') x :=
h.fst
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_fst {s : set (E × F)} :
has_fderiv_within_at prod.fst (fst 𝕜 E F) s p :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_fst
protected lemma has_fderiv_within_at.fst (h : has_fderiv_within_at f₂ f₂' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, (f₂ x).1) ((fst 𝕜 F G).comp f₂') s x :=
h.fst
lemma differentiable_at_fst : differentiable_at 𝕜 prod.fst p :=
has_fderiv_at_fst.differentiable_at
@[simp] protected lemma differentiable_at.fst (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₂ x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).1) x :=
differentiable_at_fst.comp x h
lemma differentiable_fst : differentiable 𝕜 (prod.fst : E × F → E) :=
λ x, differentiable_at_fst
@[simp] protected lemma differentiable.fst (h : differentiable 𝕜 f₂) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).1) :=
differentiable_fst.comp h
lemma differentiable_within_at_fst {s : set (E × F)} : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 prod.fst s p :=
differentiable_at_fst.differentiable_within_at
protected lemma differentiable_within_at.fst (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₂ s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).1) s x :=
differentiable_at_fst.comp_differentiable_within_at x h
lemma differentiable_on_fst {s : set (E × F)} : differentiable_on 𝕜 prod.fst s :=
differentiable_fst.differentiable_on
protected lemma differentiable_on.fst (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f₂ s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).1) s :=
differentiable_fst.comp_differentiable_on h
lemma fderiv_fst : fderiv 𝕜 prod.fst p = fst 𝕜 E F := has_fderiv_at_fst.fderiv
lemma fderiv.fst (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₂ x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).1) x = (fst 𝕜 F G).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f₂ x) :=
h.has_fderiv_at.fst.fderiv
lemma fderiv_within_fst {s : set (E × F)} (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s p) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 prod.fst s p = fst 𝕜 E F :=
has_fderiv_within_at_fst.fderiv_within hs
lemma fderiv_within.fst (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₂ s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).1) s x = (fst 𝕜 F G).comp (fderiv_within 𝕜 f₂ s x) :=
h.has_fderiv_within_at.fst.fderiv_within hs
end fst
section snd
variables {f₂ : E → F × G} {f₂' : E →L[𝕜] F × G} {p : E × F}
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at_snd : has_strict_fderiv_at prod.snd (snd 𝕜 E F) p :=
(snd 𝕜 E F).has_strict_fderiv_at
protected lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.snd (h : has_strict_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, (f₂ x).2) ((snd 𝕜 F G).comp f₂') x :=
has_strict_fderiv_at_snd.comp x h
lemma has_fderiv_at_filter_snd {L : filter (E × F)} :
has_fderiv_at_filter prod.snd (snd 𝕜 E F) p L :=
(snd 𝕜 E F).has_fderiv_at_filter
protected lemma has_fderiv_at_filter.snd (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f₂ f₂' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, (f₂ x).2) ((snd 𝕜 F G).comp f₂') x L :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_snd.comp x h
lemma has_fderiv_at_snd : has_fderiv_at prod.snd (snd 𝕜 E F) p :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_snd
protected lemma has_fderiv_at.snd (h : has_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, (f₂ x).2) ((snd 𝕜 F G).comp f₂') x :=
h.snd
lemma has_fderiv_within_at_snd {s : set (E × F)} :
has_fderiv_within_at prod.snd (snd 𝕜 E F) s p :=
has_fderiv_at_filter_snd
protected lemma has_fderiv_within_at.snd (h : has_fderiv_within_at f₂ f₂' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, (f₂ x).2) ((snd 𝕜 F G).comp f₂') s x :=
h.snd
lemma differentiable_at_snd : differentiable_at 𝕜 prod.snd p :=
has_fderiv_at_snd.differentiable_at
@[simp] protected lemma differentiable_at.snd (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₂ x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).2) x :=
differentiable_at_snd.comp x h
lemma differentiable_snd : differentiable 𝕜 (prod.snd : E × F → F) :=
λ x, differentiable_at_snd
@[simp] protected lemma differentiable.snd (h : differentiable 𝕜 f₂) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).2) :=
differentiable_snd.comp h
lemma differentiable_within_at_snd {s : set (E × F)} : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 prod.snd s p :=
differentiable_at_snd.differentiable_within_at
protected lemma differentiable_within_at.snd (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₂ s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).2) s x :=
differentiable_at_snd.comp_differentiable_within_at x h
lemma differentiable_on_snd {s : set (E × F)} : differentiable_on 𝕜 prod.snd s :=
differentiable_snd.differentiable_on
protected lemma differentiable_on.snd (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f₂ s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).2) s :=
differentiable_snd.comp_differentiable_on h
lemma fderiv_snd : fderiv 𝕜 prod.snd p = snd 𝕜 E F := has_fderiv_at_snd.fderiv
lemma fderiv.snd (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₂ x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).2) x = (snd 𝕜 F G).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f₂ x) :=
h.has_fderiv_at.snd.fderiv
lemma fderiv_within_snd {s : set (E × F)} (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s p) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 prod.snd s p = snd 𝕜 E F :=
has_fderiv_within_at_snd.fderiv_within hs
lemma fderiv_within.snd (hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f₂ s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ x, (f₂ x).2) s x = (snd 𝕜 F G).comp (fderiv_within 𝕜 f₂ s x) :=
h.has_fderiv_within_at.snd.fderiv_within hs
end snd
section prod_map
variables {f₂ : G → G'} {f₂' : G →L[𝕜] G'} {y : G} (p : E × G)
-- TODO (Lean 3.8): use `prod.map f f₂``
protected theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.prod_map (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' p.1)
(hf₂ : has_strict_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' p.2) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ p : E × G, (f p.1, f₂ p.2)) (f'.prod_map f₂') p :=
(hf.comp p has_strict_fderiv_at_fst).prod (hf₂.comp p has_strict_fderiv_at_snd)
protected theorem has_fderiv_at.prod_map (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' p.1)
(hf₂ : has_fderiv_at f₂ f₂' p.2) :
has_fderiv_at (λ p : E × G, (f p.1, f₂ p.2)) (f'.prod_map f₂') p :=
(hf.comp p has_fderiv_at_fst).prod (hf₂.comp p has_fderiv_at_snd)
@[simp] protected theorem differentiable_at.prod_map (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f p.1)
(hf₂ : differentiable_at 𝕜 f₂ p.2) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ p : E × G, (f p.1, f₂ p.2)) p :=
(hf.comp p differentiable_at_fst).prod (hf₂.comp p differentiable_at_snd)
end prod_map
end cartesian_product
section const_smul
/-! ### Derivative of a function multiplied by a constant -/
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.const_smul (h : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : 𝕜) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') x :=
(c • (1 : F →L[𝕜] F)).has_strict_fderiv_at.comp x h
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.const_smul (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') x L :=
(c • (1 : F →L[𝕜] F)).has_fderiv_at_filter.comp x h
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.const_smul (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (c : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') s x :=
h.const_smul c
theorem has_fderiv_at.const_smul (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') x :=
h.const_smul c
lemma differentiable_within_at.const_smul (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : 𝕜) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) s x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at.const_smul c).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.const_smul (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : 𝕜) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) x :=
(h.has_fderiv_at.const_smul c).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.const_smul (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (c : 𝕜) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) s :=
λx hx, (h x hx).const_smul c
lemma differentiable.const_smul (h : differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : 𝕜) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) :=
λx, (h x).const_smul c
lemma fderiv_within_const_smul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : 𝕜) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) s x = c • fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at.const_smul c).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_const_smul (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : 𝕜) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) x = c • fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(h.has_fderiv_at.const_smul c).fderiv
end const_smul
section add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.add (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x)
(hg : has_strict_fderiv_at g g' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') x :=
(hf.add hg).congr_left $ λ y, by simp; abel
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.add
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (hg : has_fderiv_at_filter g g' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') x L :=
(hf.add hg).congr_left $ λ _, by simp; abel
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.add
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_fderiv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
theorem has_fderiv_at.add
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hg : has_fderiv_at g g' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
lemma differentiable_within_at.add
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, f y + g y) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.add hg.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.add
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, f y + g y) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.add hg.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.add
(hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (hg : differentiable_on 𝕜 g s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, f y + g y) s :=
λx hx, (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.add
(hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : differentiable 𝕜 g) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, f y + g y) :=
λx, (hf x).add (hg x)
lemma fderiv_within_add (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, f y + g y) s x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x + fderiv_within 𝕜 g s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.add hg.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_add
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, f y + g y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x + fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.add hg.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.add_const (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, f y + c) f' x :=
add_zero f' ▸ hf.add (has_strict_fderiv_at_const _ _)
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.add_const
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ y, f y + c) f' x L :=
add_zero f' ▸ hf.add (has_fderiv_at_filter_const _ _ _)
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.add_const
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, f y + c) f' s x :=
hf.add_const c
theorem has_fderiv_at.add_const
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : F):
has_fderiv_at (λ x, f x + c) f' x :=
hf.add_const c
lemma differentiable_within_at.add_const
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, f y + c) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.add_const c).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.add_const
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, f y + c) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.add_const c).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.add_const
(hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (c : F) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, f y + c) s :=
λx hx, (hf x hx).add_const c
lemma differentiable.add_const
(hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : F) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, f y + c) :=
λx, (hf x).add_const c
lemma fderiv_within_add_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, f y + c) s x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.add_const c).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_add_const
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, f y + c) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.add_const c).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.const_add (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, c + f y) f' x :=
zero_add f' ▸ (has_strict_fderiv_at_const _ _).add hf
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.const_add
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ y, c + f y) f' x L :=
zero_add f' ▸ (has_fderiv_at_filter_const _ _ _).add hf
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.const_add
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c + f y) f' s x :=
hf.const_add c
theorem has_fderiv_at.const_add
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : F):
has_fderiv_at (λ x, c + f x) f' x :=
hf.const_add c
lemma differentiable_within_at.const_add
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, c + f y) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.const_add c).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.const_add
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, c + f y) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.const_add c).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.const_add
(hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (c : F) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, c + f y) s :=
λx hx, (hf x hx).const_add c
lemma differentiable.const_add
(hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : F) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, c + f y) :=
λx, (hf x).const_add c
lemma fderiv_within_const_add (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, c + f y) s x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.const_add c).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_const_add
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, c + f y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.const_add c).fderiv
end add
section sum
/-! ### Derivative of a finite sum of functions -/
open_locale big_operators
variables {ι : Type*} {u : finset ι} {A : ι → (E → F)} {A' : ι → (E →L[𝕜] F)}
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, has_strict_fderiv_at (A i) (A' i) x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) (∑ i in u, A' i) x :=
begin
dsimp [has_strict_fderiv_at] at *,
convert is_o.sum h,
simp [finset.sum_sub_distrib, continuous_linear_map.sum_apply]
end
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, has_fderiv_at_filter (A i) (A' i) x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) (∑ i in u, A' i) x L :=
begin
dsimp [has_fderiv_at_filter] at *,
convert is_o.sum h,
simp [continuous_linear_map.sum_apply]
end
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, has_fderiv_within_at (A i) (A' i) s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) (∑ i in u, A' i) s x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.sum h
theorem has_fderiv_at.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, has_fderiv_at (A i) (A' i) x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) (∑ i in u, A' i) x :=
has_fderiv_at_filter.sum h
theorem differentiable_within_at.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) s x :=
has_fderiv_within_at.differentiable_within_at $ has_fderiv_within_at.sum $
λ i hi, (h i hi).has_fderiv_within_at
@[simp] theorem differentiable_at.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, differentiable_at 𝕜 (A i) x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) x :=
has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at $ has_fderiv_at.sum $ λ i hi, (h i hi).has_fderiv_at
theorem differentiable_on.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, differentiable_on 𝕜 (A i) s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) s :=
λ x hx, differentiable_within_at.sum $ λ i hi, h i hi x hx
@[simp] theorem differentiable.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, differentiable 𝕜 (A i)) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) :=
λ x, differentiable_at.sum $ λ i hi, h i hi x
theorem fderiv_within_sum (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : ∀ i ∈ u, differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) s x = (∑ i in u, fderiv_within 𝕜 (A i) s x) :=
(has_fderiv_within_at.sum (λ i hi, (h i hi).has_fderiv_within_at)).fderiv_within hxs
theorem fderiv_sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, differentiable_at 𝕜 (A i) x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ y, ∑ i in u, A i y) x = (∑ i in u, fderiv 𝕜 (A i) x) :=
(has_fderiv_at.sum (λ i hi, (h i hi).has_fderiv_at)).fderiv
end sum
section neg
/-! ### Derivative of the negative of a function -/
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.neg (h : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') x :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).has_strict_fderiv_at.comp x h
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.neg (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, -f x) (-f') x L :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).has_fderiv_at_filter.comp x h
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.neg (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
theorem has_fderiv_at.neg (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
lemma differentiable_within_at.neg (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λy, -f y) s x :=
h.has_fderiv_within_at.neg.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.neg (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λy, -f y) x :=
h.has_fderiv_at.neg.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.neg (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, -f y) s :=
λx hx, (h x hx).neg
@[simp] lemma differentiable.neg (h : differentiable 𝕜 f) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, -f y) :=
λx, (h x).neg
lemma fderiv_within_neg (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, -f y) s x = - fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
h.has_fderiv_within_at.neg.fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_neg (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, -f y) x = - fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
h.has_fderiv_at.neg.fderiv
end neg
section sub
/-! ### Derivative of the difference of two functions -/
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.sub
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (hg : has_strict_fderiv_at g g' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.add hg.neg
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.sub
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (hg : has_fderiv_at_filter g g' x L) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x L :=
hf.add hg.neg
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.sub
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (hg : has_fderiv_within_at g g' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
hf.sub hg
theorem has_fderiv_at.sub
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hg : has_fderiv_at g g' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.sub hg
lemma differentiable_within_at.sub
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, f y - g y) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sub hg.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.sub
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, f y - g y) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.sub hg.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sub
(hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (hg : differentiable_on 𝕜 g s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, f y - g y) s :=
λx hx, (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.sub
(hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : differentiable 𝕜 g) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, f y - g y) :=
λx, (hf x).sub (hg x)
lemma fderiv_within_sub (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (hg : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 g s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, f y - g y) s x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x - fderiv_within 𝕜 g s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sub hg.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_sub
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (hg : differentiable_at 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, f y - g y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x - fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.sub hg.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.sub_const
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, f x - c) f' x :=
hf.add_const (-c)
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.sub_const
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, f x - c) f' x L :=
hf.add_const (-c)
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.sub_const
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, f x - c) f' s x :=
hf.sub_const c
theorem has_fderiv_at.sub_const
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, f x - c) f' x :=
hf.sub_const c
lemma differentiable_within_at.sub_const
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, f y - c) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sub_const c).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.sub_const
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, f y - c) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.sub_const c).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sub_const
(hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (c : F) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, f y - c) s :=
λx hx, (hf x hx).sub_const c
lemma differentiable.sub_const
(hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : F) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, f y - c) :=
λx, (hf x).sub_const c
lemma fderiv_within_sub_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, f y - c) s x = fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sub_const c).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_sub_const
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, f y - c) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.sub_const c).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.const_sub
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, c - f x) (-f') x :=
hf.neg.const_add c
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.const_sub
(hf : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, c - f x) (-f') x L :=
hf.neg.const_add c
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.const_sub
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, c - f x) (-f') s x :=
hf.const_sub c
theorem has_fderiv_at.const_sub
(hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : F) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, c - f x) (-f') x :=
hf.const_sub c
lemma differentiable_within_at.const_sub
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, c - f y) s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.const_sub c).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.const_sub
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, c - f y) x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.const_sub c).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.const_sub
(hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (c : F) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, c - f y) s :=
λx hx, (hf x hx).const_sub c
lemma differentiable.const_sub
(hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : F) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, c - f y) :=
λx, (hf x).const_sub c
lemma fderiv_within_const_sub (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, c - f y) s x = -fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_within_at.const_sub c).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_const_sub
(hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, c - f y) x = -fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(hf.has_fderiv_at.const_sub c).fderiv
end sub
section bilinear_map
/-! ### Derivative of a bounded bilinear map -/
variables {b : E × F → G} {u : set (E × F) }
open normed_field
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_strict_fderiv_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
has_strict_fderiv_at b (h.deriv p) p :=
begin
rw has_strict_fderiv_at,
set T := (E × F) × (E × F),
have : is_o (λ q : T, b (q.1 - q.2)) (λ q : T, ∥q.1 - q.2∥ * 1) (𝓝 (p, p)),
{ refine (h.is_O'.comp_tendsto le_top).trans_is_o _,
simp only [(∘)],
refine (is_O_refl (λ q : T, ∥q.1 - q.2∥) _).mul_is_o (is_o.norm_left $ (is_o_one_iff _).2 _),
rw [← sub_self p],
exact continuous_at_fst.sub continuous_at_snd },
simp only [mul_one, is_o_norm_right] at this,
refine (is_o.congr_of_sub _).1 this, clear this,
convert_to is_o (λ q : T, h.deriv (p - q.2) (q.1 - q.2)) (λ q : T, q.1 - q.2) (𝓝 (p, p)),
{ ext ⟨⟨x₁, y₁⟩, ⟨x₂, y₂⟩⟩, rcases p with ⟨x, y⟩,
simp only [is_bounded_bilinear_map_deriv_coe, prod.mk_sub_mk, h.map_sub_left, h.map_sub_right],
abel },
have : is_o (λ q : T, p - q.2) (λ q, (1:ℝ)) (𝓝 (p, p)),
from (is_o_one_iff _).2 (sub_self p ▸ tendsto_const_nhds.sub continuous_at_snd),
apply is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply.is_O_comp.trans_is_o,
refine is_o.trans_is_O _ (is_O_const_mul_self 1 _ _).of_norm_right,
refine is_o.mul_is_O _ (is_O_refl _ _),
exact (((h.is_bounded_linear_map_deriv.is_O_id ⊤).comp_tendsto le_top : _).trans_is_o this).norm_left
end
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
has_fderiv_at b (h.deriv p) p :=
(h.has_strict_fderiv_at p).has_fderiv_at
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.has_fderiv_within_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
has_fderiv_within_at b (h.deriv p) u p :=
(h.has_fderiv_at p).has_fderiv_within_at
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.differentiable_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 b p :=
(h.has_fderiv_at p).differentiable_at
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.differentiable_within_at (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b)
(p : E × F) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 b u p :=
(h.differentiable_at p).differentiable_within_at
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.fderiv (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
fderiv 𝕜 b p = h.deriv p :=
has_fderiv_at.fderiv (h.has_fderiv_at p)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.fderiv_within (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) (p : E × F)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 u p) : fderiv_within 𝕜 b u p = h.deriv p :=
begin
rw differentiable_at.fderiv_within (h.differentiable_at p) hxs,
exact h.fderiv p
end
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.differentiable (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) :
differentiable 𝕜 b :=
λx, h.differentiable_at x
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.differentiable_on (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 b u :=
h.differentiable.differentiable_on
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) :
continuous b :=
h.differentiable.continuous
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous_left (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) {f : F} :
continuous (λe, b (e, f)) :=
h.continuous.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.continuous_right (h : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) {e : E} :
continuous (λf, b (e, f)) :=
h.continuous.comp (continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id)
end bilinear_map
section smul
/-! ### Derivative of the product of a scalar-valued function and a vector-valued function -/
variables {c : E → 𝕜} {c' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜}
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.smul (hc : has_strict_fderiv_at c c' x)
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smul_right (f x)) x :=
(is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul.has_strict_fderiv_at (c x, f x)).comp x $
hc.prod hf
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.smul
(hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smul_right (f x)) s x :=
(is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul.has_fderiv_at (c x, f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x $
hc.prod hf
theorem has_fderiv_at.smul (hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smul_right (f x)) x :=
(is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul.has_fderiv_at (c x, f x)).comp x $
hc.prod hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.smul
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul hf.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.smul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul hf.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.smul (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).smul (hf x hx)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.smul (hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) :=
λx, (hc x).smul (hf x)
lemma fderiv_within_smul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) s x =
c x • fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x + (fderiv_within 𝕜 c s x).smul_right (f x) :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul hf.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_smul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) x =
c x • fderiv 𝕜 f x + (fderiv 𝕜 c x).smul_right (f x) :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul hf.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.smul_const (hc : has_strict_fderiv_at c c' x) (f : F) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f) (c'.smul_right f) x :=
by simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (has_strict_fderiv_at_const f x)
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.smul_const (hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (f : F) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c y • f) (c'.smul_right f) s x :=
by simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (has_fderiv_within_at_const f x s)
theorem has_fderiv_at.smul_const (hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (f : F) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f) (c'.smul_right f) x :=
by simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (has_fderiv_at_const f x)
lemma differentiable_within_at.smul_const
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (f : F) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul_const f).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.smul_const (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (f : F) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul_const f).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.smul_const (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (f : F) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).smul_const f
lemma differentiable.smul_const (hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (f : F) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) :=
λx, (hc x).smul_const f
lemma fderiv_within_smul_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (f : F) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) s x =
(fderiv_within 𝕜 c s x).smul_right f :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul_const f).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_smul_const (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (f : F) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) x = (fderiv 𝕜 c x).smul_right f :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul_const f).fderiv
end smul
section mul
/-! ### Derivative of the product of two scalar-valued functions -/
variables {c d : E → 𝕜} {c' d' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜}
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.mul
(hc : has_strict_fderiv_at c c' x) (hd : has_strict_fderiv_at d d' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') x :=
by { convert hc.smul hd, ext z, apply mul_comm }
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.mul
(hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (hd : has_fderiv_within_at d d' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') s x :=
by { convert hc.smul hd, ext z, apply mul_comm }
theorem has_fderiv_at.mul (hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (hd : has_fderiv_at d d' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') x :=
by { convert hc.smul hd, ext z, apply mul_comm }
lemma differentiable_within_at.mul
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d y) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.mul hd.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.mul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d y) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.mul hd.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.mul (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (hd : differentiable_on 𝕜 d s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d y) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).mul (hd x hx)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.mul (hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (hd : differentiable 𝕜 d) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d y) :=
λx, (hc x).mul (hd x)
lemma fderiv_within_mul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hd : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 d s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d y) s x =
c x • fderiv_within 𝕜 d s x + d x • fderiv_within 𝕜 c s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.mul hd.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_mul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hd : differentiable_at 𝕜 d x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d y) x =
c x • fderiv 𝕜 d x + d x • fderiv 𝕜 c x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.mul hd.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.mul_const (hc : has_strict_fderiv_at c c' x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, c y * d) (d • c') x :=
by simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.mul (has_strict_fderiv_at_const d x)
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.mul_const (hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c y * d) (d • c') s x :=
by simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.mul (has_fderiv_within_at_const d x s)
theorem has_fderiv_at.mul_const (hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, c y * d) (d • c') x :=
begin
rw [← has_fderiv_within_at_univ] at *,
exact hc.mul_const d
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.mul_const
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (d : 𝕜) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.mul_const d).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.mul_const (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (d : 𝕜) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.mul_const d).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.mul_const (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (d : 𝕜) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).mul_const d
lemma differentiable.mul_const (hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (d : 𝕜) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d) :=
λx, (hc x).mul_const d
lemma fderiv_within_mul_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (d : 𝕜) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d) s x = d • fderiv_within 𝕜 c s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.mul_const d).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_mul_const (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (d : 𝕜) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ y, c y * d) x = d • fderiv 𝕜 c x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.mul_const d).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.const_mul (hc : has_strict_fderiv_at c c' x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, d * c y) (d • c') x :=
begin
simp only [mul_comm d],
exact hc.mul_const d,
end
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.const_mul
(hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, d * c y) (d • c') s x :=
begin
simp only [mul_comm d],
exact hc.mul_const d,
end
theorem has_fderiv_at.const_mul (hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (d : 𝕜) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, d * c y) (d • c') x :=
begin
simp only [mul_comm d],
exact hc.mul_const d,
end
lemma differentiable_within_at.const_mul
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (d : 𝕜) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, d * c y) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.const_mul d).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.const_mul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (d : 𝕜) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, d * c y) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.const_mul d).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.const_mul (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (d : 𝕜) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ y, d * c y) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).const_mul d
lemma differentiable.const_mul (hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (d : 𝕜) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ y, d * c y) :=
λx, (hc x).const_mul d
lemma fderiv_within_const_mul (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (d : 𝕜) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, d * c y) s x = d • fderiv_within 𝕜 c s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.const_mul d).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_const_mul (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (d : 𝕜) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ y, d * c y) x = d • fderiv 𝕜 c x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.const_mul d).fderiv
end mul
section algebra_inverse
variables {R :Type*} [normed_ring R] [normed_algebra 𝕜 R] [complete_space R]
open normed_ring continuous_linear_map ring
/-- At an invertible element `x` of a normed algebra `R`, the Fréchet derivative of the inversion
operation is the linear map `λ t, - x⁻¹ * t * x⁻¹`. -/
lemma has_fderiv_at_ring_inverse (x : units R) :
has_fderiv_at ring.inverse (- (lmul_right 𝕜 R ↑x⁻¹).comp (lmul_left 𝕜 R ↑x⁻¹)) x :=
begin
have h_is_o : is_o (λ (t : R), inverse (↑x + t) - ↑x⁻¹ + ↑x⁻¹ * t * ↑x⁻¹)
(λ (t : R), t) (𝓝 0),
{ refine (inverse_add_norm_diff_second_order x).trans_is_o ((is_o_norm_norm).mp _),
simp only [normed_field.norm_pow, norm_norm],
have h12 : 1 < 2 := by norm_num,
convert (asymptotics.is_o_pow_pow h12).comp_tendsto lim_norm_zero,
ext, simp },
have h_lim : tendsto (λ (y:R), y - x) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0),
{ refine tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr _,
exact tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mp tendsto_id },
simp only [has_fderiv_at, has_fderiv_at_filter],
convert h_is_o.comp_tendsto h_lim,
ext y,
simp only [coe_comp', function.comp_app, lmul_right_apply, lmul_left_apply, neg_apply,
inverse_unit x, units.inv_mul, add_sub_cancel'_right, mul_sub, sub_mul, one_mul],
abel
end
lemma differentiable_at_inverse (x : units R) : differentiable_at 𝕜 (@ring.inverse R _) x :=
(has_fderiv_at_ring_inverse x).differentiable_at
lemma fderiv_inverse (x : units R) :
fderiv 𝕜 (@ring.inverse R _) x = - (lmul_right 𝕜 R ↑x⁻¹).comp (lmul_left 𝕜 R ↑x⁻¹) :=
(has_fderiv_at_ring_inverse x).fderiv
end algebra_inverse
section continuous_linear_equiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F)
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.has_strict_fderiv_at :
has_strict_fderiv_at iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.to_continuous_linear_map.has_strict_fderiv_at
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_within_at :
has_fderiv_within_at iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iso.to_continuous_linear_map.has_fderiv_within_at
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_at : has_fderiv_at iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.to_continuous_linear_map.has_fderiv_at_filter
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_at : differentiable_at 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.has_fderiv_at.differentiable_at
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_within_at :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.has_fderiv_at.fderiv
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv_within (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
iso.to_continuous_linear_map.fderiv_within hxs
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable : differentiable 𝕜 iso :=
λx, iso.differentiable_at
protected lemma continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_on : differentiable_on 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiable_on
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff {f : G → E} {s : set G} {x : G} :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, _, λ H, iso.differentiable.differentiable_at.comp_differentiable_within_at x H⟩,
have : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (iso.symm ∘ (iso ∘ f)) s x :=
iso.symm.differentiable.differentiable_at.comp_differentiable_within_at x H,
rwa [← function.comp.assoc iso.symm iso f, iso.symm_comp_self] at this,
end
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_at_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
by rw [← differentiable_within_at_univ, ← differentiable_within_at_univ,
iso.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff]
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_on_iff {f : G → E} {s : set G} :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
begin
rw [differentiable_on, differentiable_on],
simp only [iso.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff],
end
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} :
differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ differentiable 𝕜 f :=
begin
rw [← differentiable_on_univ, ← differentiable_on_univ],
exact iso.comp_differentiable_on_iff
end
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff
{f : G → E} {s : set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
has_fderiv_within_at (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, _, λ H, iso.has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x H⟩,
have A : f = iso.symm ∘ (iso ∘ f), by { rw [← function.comp.assoc, iso.symm_comp_self], refl },
have B : f' = (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f'),
by rw [← continuous_linear_map.comp_assoc, iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, continuous_linear_map.id_comp],
rw [A, B],
exact iso.symm.has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x H
end
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
has_strict_fderiv_at (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, _, λ H, iso.has_strict_fderiv_at.comp x H⟩,
convert iso.symm.has_strict_fderiv_at.comp x H; ext z; apply (iso.symm_apply_apply _).symm
end
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
has_fderiv_at (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ has_fderiv_at f f' x :=
by rw [← has_fderiv_within_at_univ, ← has_fderiv_within_at_univ, iso.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff]
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff'
{f : G → E} {s : set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_within_at (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔
has_fderiv_within_at f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x :=
by rw [← iso.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff, ← continuous_linear_map.comp_assoc,
iso.coe_comp_coe_symm, continuous_linear_map.id_comp]
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
has_fderiv_at (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ has_fderiv_at f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x :=
by rw [← has_fderiv_within_at_univ, ← has_fderiv_within_at_univ, iso.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff']
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv_within {f : G → E} {s : set G} {x : G}
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x) :=
begin
by_cases h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x,
{ rw [fderiv.comp_fderiv_within x iso.differentiable_at h hxs, iso.fderiv] },
{ have : ¬differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x,
from mt iso.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff.1 h,
rw [fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at h,
fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at this,
continuous_linear_map.comp_zero] }
end
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
begin
rw [← fderiv_within_univ, ← fderiv_within_univ],
exact iso.comp_fderiv_within unique_diff_within_at_univ,
end
end continuous_linear_equiv
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in some neighborhood of `a`, `g` is continuous at `a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `g a` in the strict sense, then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`
in the strict sense.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have an
inverse function. -/
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.of_local_left_inverse {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {g : F → E} {a : F}
(hg : continuous_at g a) (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (g a))
(hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f (g y) = y) :
has_strict_fderiv_at g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a :=
begin
replace hg := hg.prod_map' hg,
replace hfg := hfg.prod_mk_nhds hfg,
have : is_O (λ p : F × F, g p.1 - g p.2 - f'.symm (p.1 - p.2))
(λ p : F × F, f' (g p.1 - g p.2) - (p.1 - p.2)) (𝓝 (a, a)),
{ refine ((f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).is_O_comp _ _).congr (λ x, _) (λ _, rfl),
simp },
refine this.trans_is_o _, clear this,
refine ((hf.comp_tendsto hg).symm.congr' (hfg.mono _)
(eventually_of_forall $ λ _, rfl)).trans_is_O _,
{ rintros p ⟨hp1, hp2⟩,
simp [hp1, hp2] },
{ refine (hf.is_O_sub_rev.comp_tendsto hg).congr'
(eventually_of_forall $ λ _, rfl) (hfg.mono _),
rintros p ⟨hp1, hp2⟩,
simp only [(∘), hp1, hp2] }
end
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in some neighborhood of `a`, `g` is continuous at `a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `g a`, then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem has_fderiv_at.of_local_left_inverse {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {g : F → E} {a : F}
(hg : continuous_at g a) (hf : has_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (g a))
(hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f (g y) = y) :
has_fderiv_at g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a :=
begin
have : is_O (λ x : F, g x - g a - f'.symm (x - a)) (λ x : F, f' (g x - g a) - (x - a)) (𝓝 a),
{ refine ((f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).is_O_comp _ _).congr (λ x, _) (λ _, rfl),
simp },
refine this.trans_is_o _, clear this,
refine ((hf.comp_tendsto hg).symm.congr' (hfg.mono _)
(eventually_of_forall $ λ _, rfl)).trans_is_O _,
{ rintros p hp,
simp [hp, hfg.self_of_nhds] },
{ refine (hf.is_O_sub_rev.comp_tendsto hg).congr'
(eventually_of_forall $ λ _, rfl) (hfg.mono _),
rintros p hp,
simp only [(∘), hp, hfg.self_of_nhds] }
end
end
section
/-
In the special case of a normed space over the reals,
we can use scalar multiplication in the `tendsto` characterization
of the Fréchet derivative.
-/
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F]
variables {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[ℝ] F} {x : E}
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter_real_equiv {L : filter E} :
tendsto (λ x' : E, ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ * ∥f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)∥) L (𝓝 0) ↔
tendsto (λ x' : E, ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ • (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x))) L (𝓝 0) :=
begin
symmetry,
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero], refine tendsto_congr (λ x', _),
have : ∥x' - x∥⁻¹ ≥ 0, from inv_nonneg.mpr (norm_nonneg _),
simp [norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg this]
end
lemma has_fderiv_at.lim_real (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (v : E) :
tendsto (λ (c:ℝ), c • (f (x + c⁻¹ • v) - f x)) at_top (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
begin
apply hf.lim v,
rw tendsto_at_top_at_top,
exact λ b, ⟨b, λ a ha, le_trans ha (le_abs_self _)⟩
end
end
section tangent_cone
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
{f : E → F} {s : set E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F}
/-- The image of a tangent cone under the differential of a map is included in the tangent cone to
the image. -/
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.maps_to_tangent_cone {x : E} (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
maps_to f' (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x) (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 (f '' s) (f x)) :=
begin
rintros v ⟨c, d, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩,
refine ⟨c, (λn, f (x + d n) - f x), mem_sets_of_superset dtop _, clim, h.lim at_top dtop clim cdlim⟩,
simp [-mem_image, mem_image_of_mem] {contextual := tt}
end
/-- If a set has the unique differentiability property at a point x, then the image of this set
under a map with onto derivative has also the unique differentiability property at the image point.
-/
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.unique_diff_within_at {x : E} (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x)
(hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) (h' : closure (range f') = univ) :
unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 (f '' s) (f x) :=
begin
have B : ∀v ∈ (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x) : set E),
f' v ∈ (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 (f '' s) (f x)) : set F),
{ assume v hv,
apply submodule.span_induction hv,
{ exact λ w hw, submodule.subset_span (h.maps_to_tangent_cone hw) },
{ simp },
{ assume w₁ w₂ hw₁ hw₂,
rw continuous_linear_map.map_add,
exact submodule.add_mem (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 (f '' s) (f x))) hw₁ hw₂ },
{ assume a w hw,
rw continuous_linear_map.map_smul,
exact submodule.smul_mem (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 (f '' s) (f x))) _ hw } },
rw [unique_diff_within_at, ← univ_subset_iff],
split,
show f x ∈ closure (f '' s), from h.continuous_within_at.mem_closure_image hs.2,
show univ ⊆ closure ↑(submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 (f '' s) (f x))), from calc
univ ⊆ closure (range f') : univ_subset_iff.2 h'
... = closure (f' '' univ) : by rw image_univ
... = closure (f' '' (closure (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x) : set E))) : by rw hs.1
... ⊆ closure (closure (f' '' (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x) : set E))) :
closure_mono (image_closure_subset_closure_image f'.cont)
... = closure (f' '' (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 s x) : set E)) : closure_closure
... ⊆ closure (submodule.span 𝕜 (tangent_cone_at 𝕜 (f '' s) (f x)) : set F) :
closure_mono (image_subset_iff.mpr B)
end
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.unique_diff_within_at_of_continuous_linear_equiv
{x : E} (e' : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (h : has_fderiv_within_at f (e' : E →L[𝕜] F) s x)
(hs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x) :
unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 (f '' s) (f x) :=
begin
apply h.unique_diff_within_at hs,
have : set.range (e' : E →L[𝕜] F) = univ := e'.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.range_eq_univ,
rw [this, closure_univ]
end
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.unique_diff_on_preimage_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] E) :
unique_diff_on 𝕜 (e ⁻¹' s) ↔ unique_diff_on 𝕜 s :=
begin
split,
{ assume hs x hx,
have A : s = e '' (e.symm '' s) :=
(equiv.symm_image_image (e.symm.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv) s).symm,
have B : e.symm '' s = e⁻¹' s :=
equiv.image_eq_preimage e.symm.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv s,
rw [A, B, (e.apply_symm_apply x).symm],
refine has_fderiv_within_at.unique_diff_within_at_of_continuous_linear_equiv e
e.has_fderiv_within_at (hs _ _),
rwa [mem_preimage, e.apply_symm_apply x] },
{ assume hs x hx,
have : e ⁻¹' s = e.symm '' s :=
(equiv.image_eq_preimage e.symm.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv s).symm,
rw [this, (e.symm_apply_apply x).symm],
exact has_fderiv_within_at.unique_diff_within_at_of_continuous_linear_equiv e.symm
e.symm.has_fderiv_within_at (hs _ hx) },
end
end tangent_cone
section restrict_scalars
/-!
### Restricting from `ℂ` to `ℝ`, or generally from `𝕜'` to `𝕜`
If a function is differentiable over `ℂ`, then it is differentiable over `ℝ`. In this paragraph,
we give variants of this statement, in the general situation where `ℂ` and `ℝ` are replaced
respectively by `𝕜'` and `𝕜` where `𝕜'` is a normed algebra over `𝕜`.
-/
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{𝕜' : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜' E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜' F]
{f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E → semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F}
{f' : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E →L[𝕜'] semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F} {s : set E} {x : E}
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars (h : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f (f'.restrict_scalars 𝕜) x := h
lemma has_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at f (f'.restrict_scalars 𝕜) x := h
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.restrict_scalars (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at f (f'.restrict_scalars 𝕜) s x := h
lemma differentiable_at.restrict_scalars (h : differentiable_at 𝕜' f x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
(h.has_fderiv_at.restrict_scalars 𝕜).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_within_at.restrict_scalars (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜' f s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at.restrict_scalars 𝕜).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_on.restrict_scalars (h : differentiable_on 𝕜' f s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
λx hx, (h x hx).restrict_scalars 𝕜
lemma differentiable.restrict_scalars (h : differentiable 𝕜' f) :
differentiable 𝕜 f :=
λx, (h x).restrict_scalars 𝕜
end restrict_scalars
/-!
### Multiplying by a complex function respects real differentiability
Consider two functions `c : E → ℂ` and `f : E → F` where `F` is a complex vector space. If both
`c` and `f` are differentiable over `ℝ`, then so is their product. This paragraph proves this
statement, in the general version where `ℝ` is replaced by a field `𝕜`, and `ℂ` is replaced
by a normed algebra `𝕜'` over `𝕜`.
-/
section smul_algebra
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{𝕜' : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜' F]
{f : E → semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F}
{f' : E →L[𝕜] semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F} {s : set E} {x : E}
{c : E → 𝕜'} {c' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {L : filter E}
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.smul_algebra (hc : has_strict_fderiv_at c c' x)
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smul_algebra_right (f x)) x :=
(is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul_algebra.has_strict_fderiv_at (c x, f x)).comp x $
hc.prod hf
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.smul_algebra
(hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smul_algebra_right (f x)) s x :=
(is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul_algebra.has_fderiv_at (c x, f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x $
hc.prod hf
theorem has_fderiv_at.smul_algebra (hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smul_algebra_right (f x)) x :=
(is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul_algebra.has_fderiv_at (c x, f x)).comp x $
hc.prod hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.smul_algebra
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul_algebra hf.has_fderiv_within_at).differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.smul_algebra
(hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul_algebra hf.has_fderiv_at).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.smul_algebra (hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).smul_algebra (hf x hx)
@[simp] lemma differentiable.smul_algebra (hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (hf : differentiable 𝕜 f) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) :=
λx, (hc x).smul_algebra (hf x)
lemma fderiv_within_smul_algebra (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (hf : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) s x =
c x • fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x + (fderiv_within 𝕜 c s x).smul_algebra_right (f x) :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul_algebra hf.has_fderiv_within_at).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_smul_algebra (hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (hf : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f y) x =
c x • fderiv 𝕜 f x + (fderiv 𝕜 c x).smul_algebra_right (f x) :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul_algebra hf.has_fderiv_at).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.smul_algebra_const
(hc : has_strict_fderiv_at c c' x) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f) (c'.smul_algebra_right f) x :=
by simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul_algebra (has_strict_fderiv_at_const f x)
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.smul_algebra_const
(hc : has_fderiv_within_at c c' s x) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, c y • f) (c'.smul_algebra_right f) s x :=
by simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul_algebra (has_fderiv_within_at_const f x s)
theorem has_fderiv_at.smul_algebra_const
(hc : has_fderiv_at c c' x) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
has_fderiv_at (λ y, c y • f) (c'.smul_algebra_right f) x :=
by simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul_algebra (has_fderiv_at_const f x)
lemma differentiable_within_at.smul_algebra_const
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) s x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul_algebra_const f).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.smul_algebra_const
(hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) x :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul_algebra_const f).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.smul_algebra_const
(hc : differentiable_on 𝕜 c s) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) s :=
λx hx, (hc x hx).smul_algebra_const f
lemma differentiable.smul_algebra_const
(hc : differentiable 𝕜 c) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
differentiable 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) :=
λx, (hc x).smul_algebra_const f
lemma fderiv_within_smul_algebra_const (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(hc : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 c s x) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) s x =
(fderiv_within 𝕜 c s x).smul_algebra_right f :=
(hc.has_fderiv_within_at.smul_algebra_const f).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_smul_algebra_const
(hc : differentiable_at 𝕜 c x) (f : semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :
fderiv 𝕜 (λ y, c y • f) x = (fderiv 𝕜 c x).smul_algebra_right f :=
(hc.has_fderiv_at.smul_algebra_const f).fderiv
theorem has_strict_fderiv_at.const_smul_algebra (h : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : 𝕜') :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') x :=
(c • (1 : (semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) →L[𝕜] ((semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F))))
.has_strict_fderiv_at.comp x h
theorem has_fderiv_at_filter.const_smul_algebra (h : has_fderiv_at_filter f f' x L) (c : 𝕜') :
has_fderiv_at_filter (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') x L :=
(c • (1 : (semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) →L[𝕜] ((semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F))))
.has_fderiv_at_filter.comp x h
theorem has_fderiv_within_at.const_smul_algebra (h : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) (c : 𝕜') :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') s x :=
h.const_smul_algebra c
theorem has_fderiv_at.const_smul_algebra (h : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (c : 𝕜') :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, c • f x) (c • f') x :=
h.const_smul_algebra c
lemma differentiable_within_at.const_smul_algebra (h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : 𝕜') :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) s x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at.const_smul_algebra c).differentiable_within_at
lemma differentiable_at.const_smul_algebra (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : 𝕜') :
differentiable_at 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) x :=
(h.has_fderiv_at.const_smul_algebra c).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.const_smul_algebra (h : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s) (c : 𝕜') :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) s :=
λx hx, (h x hx).const_smul_algebra c
lemma differentiable.const_smul_algebra (h : differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : 𝕜') :
differentiable 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) :=
λx, (h x).const_smul_algebra c
lemma fderiv_within_const_smul_algebra (hxs : unique_diff_within_at 𝕜 s x)
(h : differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x) (c : 𝕜') :
fderiv_within 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) s x = c • fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at.const_smul_algebra c).fderiv_within hxs
lemma fderiv_const_smul_algebra (h : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x) (c : 𝕜') :
fderiv 𝕜 (λy, c • f y) x = c • fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(h.has_fderiv_at.const_smul_algebra c).fderiv
end smul_algebra
|
8e5d7b6bd15eece45c856774aad52f7e3912a1c9 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/param.lean | 6c8ab07a2551d80a2b8d2bbff339017c24474699 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 514 | lean | import data.num
open num
definition foo1 a b c := a + b + (c:num)
definition foo2 (a : num) b c := a + b + c
definition foo3 a b (c : num) := a + b + c
definition foo4 (a b c : num) := a + b + c
definition foo5 (a b c) : num := a + b + c
definition foo6 {a b c} : num := a + b + c
definition foo7 a b c : num := a + b + c -- Error
definition foo8 (a b c : num) : num := a + b + c
definition foo9 (a : num) (b : num) (c : num) : num := a + b + c
definition foo10 (a : num) b (c : num) : num := a + b + c
|
a0ee01519f8f1e1b45cd9b00054d9a863f05fe61 | 85d23ae5fcdcd77981feb67549852ff901e8a583 | /kan.lean | 2c06fd81d16e16d3661ed6b4465d196a0e278a0f | [] | no_license | javra/cubes | 5b480abcf1a869335a82b4fb5357ec4d16ab56bc | 734bdf71b9086b0ba9ef7dba3ede0c71f10872cc | refs/heads/master | 1,611,513,591,851 | 1,489,495,303,000 | 1,489,495,303,000 | 84,469,571 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 439 | lean | /- THE UNIFORM KAN CONDITION ON CUBICAL SETS -/
import .cset
structure open_box (X : fcset) (m : ℕ) (a : bool) (S : set (fi $ m + 1)) :=
(bottom : X^.obj (m + 1))
(side : Π (i ∈ S) (b : bool), X^.obj (m + 1))
(adj_bottom : Π (i ∈ S) (b : bool),
X^.zproj a (side i H b) = X^.proj i b bottom)
(adj_side : Π {i} (Hi: i ∈ S) {j} (Hj: j ∈ S) (b c : bool),
X^.proj j b (side i Hi c) = X^.proj i c (side j Hj c))
|
49e7018538e719a26c883d9c72c6ec1aede5bf17 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/order/filter/basic.lean | cadc4fdd3748ce3a0e3f3be8cc554ade5d31c060 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 117,464 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import data.set.finite
import order.copy
import order.zorn
import tactic.monotonicity
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
## Main definitions
* `filter` : filters on a set;
* `at_top`, `at_bot`, `cofinite`, `principal` : specific filters;
* `map`, `comap`, `prod` : operations on filters;
* `tendsto` : limit with respect to filters;
* `eventually` : `f.eventually p` means `{x | p x} ∈ f`;
* `frequently` : `f.frequently p` means `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`;
* `filter_upwards [h₁, ..., hₙ]` : takes a list of proofs `hᵢ : sᵢ ∈ f`, and replaces a goal `s ∈ f`
with `∀ x, x ∈ s₁ → ... → x ∈ sₙ → x ∈ s`;
* `ne_bot f` : an utility class stating that `f` is a non-trivial filter.
Filters on a type `X` are sets of sets of `X` satisfying three conditions. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
In this file, we define the type `filter X` of filters on `X`, and endow it with a complete lattice
structure. This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `set (set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`filter.map` and a pull-back operation `filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
Finally we describe a product operation `filter X → filter Y → filter (X × Y)`.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(at_top : filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in topology.uniform_space.basic)
* `μ.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ` (defined in
`measure_theory.measure_space`)
The general notion of limit of a map with respect to filters on the source and target types
is `filter.tendsto`. It is defined in terms of the order and the push-forward operation.
The predicate "happening eventually" is `filter.eventually`, and "happening often" is
`filter.frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
For instance, anticipating on topology.basic, the statement: "if a sequence `u` converges to
some `x` and `u n` belongs to a set `M` for `n` large enough then `x` is in the closure of
`M`" is formalized as: `tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x) → (∀ᶠ n in at_top, u n ∈ M) → x ∈ closure M`,
which is a special case of `mem_closure_of_tendsto` from topology.basic.
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `f ×ᶠ g` : `filter.prod f g`, localized in `filter`;
* `𝓟 s` : `principal s`, localized in `filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[ne_bot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
open set function
universes u v w x y
open_locale classical
/-- A filter `F` on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. We do not forbid this collection to be
all sets of `α`. -/
structure filter (α : Type*) :=
(sets : set (set α))
(univ_sets : set.univ ∈ sets)
(sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets)
(inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets)
/-- If `F` is a filter on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ F` as on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*}: has_mem (set α) (filter α) := ⟨λ U F, U ∈ F.sets⟩
namespace filter
variables {α : Type u} {f g : filter α} {s t : set α}
@[simp] protected lemma mem_mk {t : set (set α)} {h₁ h₂ h₃} : s ∈ mk t h₁ h₂ h₃ ↔ s ∈ t := iff.rfl
@[simp] protected lemma mem_sets : s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ f := iff.rfl
instance inhabited_mem : inhabited {s : set α // s ∈ f} := ⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
lemma filter_eq : ∀ {f g : filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨a, _, _, _⟩ ⟨._, _, _, _⟩ rfl := rfl
lemma filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
protected lemma ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g :=
by simp only [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff, filter.mem_sets]
@[ext]
protected lemma ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g) → f = g :=
filter.ext_iff.2
@[simp] lemma univ_mem : univ ∈ f :=
f.univ_sets
lemma mem_of_superset : ∀ {x y : set α}, x ∈ f → x ⊆ y → y ∈ f :=
f.sets_of_superset
lemma inter_mem : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ f → t ∈ f → s ∩ t ∈ f :=
f.inter_sets
@[simp] lemma inter_mem_iff {s t} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_superset h (inter_subset_left s t),
mem_of_superset h (inter_subset_right s t)⟩, and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
lemma univ_mem' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s) : s ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset univ_mem (λ x _, h x)
lemma mp_mem (hs : s ∈ f) (h : {x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t} ∈ f) : t ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hs h) $ λ x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ h₁
lemma congr_sets (h : {x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t} ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨λ hs, mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h (λ x, iff.mp)),
λ hs, mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h (λ x, iff.mpr))⟩
@[simp] lemma bInter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → set α} {is : set β} (hf : finite is) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
finite.induction_on hf (by simp) (λ i s hi _ hs, by simp [hs])
@[simp] lemma bInter_finset_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → set α} (is : finset β) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
bInter_mem is.finite_to_set
alias bInter_finset_mem ← finset.Inter_mem_sets
attribute [protected] finset.Inter_mem_sets
@[simp] lemma sInter_mem {s : set (set α)} (hfin : finite s) :
⋂₀ s ∈ f ↔ ∀ U ∈ s, U ∈ f :=
by rw [sInter_eq_bInter, bInter_mem hfin]
@[simp] lemma Inter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → set α} [fintype β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f :=
by simpa using bInter_mem finite_univ
lemma exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨λ ⟨t, ht, ts⟩, mem_of_superset ht ts, λ hs, ⟨s, hs, subset.rfl⟩⟩
lemma monotone_mem {f : filter α} : monotone (λ s, s ∈ f) :=
λ s t hst h, mem_of_superset h hst
end filter
namespace tactic.interactive
open tactic interactive
/-- `filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f`
and terms `h1 : t1 ∈ f, ⋯, hn : tn ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ t1 → ⋯ → x ∈ tn → x ∈ s`.
`filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn] e` is a short form for `{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
-/
meta def filter_upwards
(s : parse types.pexpr_list)
(e' : parse $ optional types.texpr) : tactic unit :=
do
s.reverse.mmap (λ e, eapplyc `filter.mp_mem >> eapply e),
eapplyc `filter.univ_mem',
`[dsimp only [set.mem_set_of_eq]],
match e' with
| some e := interactive.exact e
| none := skip
end
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "filter_upwards",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.filter_upwards],
tags := ["goal management", "lemma application"] }
end tactic.interactive
namespace filter
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
section principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : set α) : filter α :=
{ sets := {t | s ⊆ t},
univ_sets := subset_univ s,
sets_of_superset := λ x y hx, subset.trans hx,
inter_sets := λ x y, subset_inter }
localized "notation `𝓟` := filter.principal" in filter
instance : inhabited (filter α) :=
⟨𝓟 ∅⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_principal {s t : set α} : s ∈ 𝓟 t ↔ t ⊆ s := iff.rfl
lemma mem_principal_self (s : set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := subset.rfl
end principal
open_locale filter
section join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : filter (filter α)) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | {t : filter α | s ∈ t} ∈ f},
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_set_of_eq, univ_sets, ← filter.mem_sets, set_of_true],
sets_of_superset := λ x y hx xy,
mem_of_superset hx $ λ f h, mem_of_superset h xy,
inter_sets := λ x y hx hy,
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx hy) $ λ f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, inter_mem h₁ h₂ }
@[simp] lemma mem_join {s : set α} {f : filter (filter α)} :
s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f := iff.rfl
end join
section lattice
instance : partial_order (filter α) :=
{ le := λ f g, ∀ ⦃U : set α⦄, U ∈ g → U ∈ f,
le_antisymm := λ a b h₁ h₂, filter_eq $ subset.antisymm h₂ h₁,
le_refl := λ a, subset.rfl,
le_trans := λ a b c h₁ h₂, subset.trans h₂ h₁ }
theorem le_def {f g : filter α} : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g, x ∈ f := iff.rfl
/-- `generate_sets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive generate_sets (g : set (set α)) : set α → Prop
| basic {s : set α} : s ∈ g → generate_sets s
| univ : generate_sets univ
| superset {s t : set α} : generate_sets s → s ⊆ t → generate_sets t
| inter {s t : set α} : generate_sets s → generate_sets t → generate_sets (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the smallest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : set (set α)) : filter α :=
{ sets := generate_sets g,
univ_sets := generate_sets.univ,
sets_of_superset := λ x y, generate_sets.superset,
inter_sets := λ s t, generate_sets.inter }
lemma sets_iff_generate {s : set (set α)} {f : filter α} : f ≤ filter.generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
iff.intro
(λ h u hu, h $ generate_sets.basic $ hu)
(λ h u hu, hu.rec_on h univ_mem
(λ x y _ hxy hx, mem_of_superset hx hxy)
(λ x y _ _ hx hy, inter_mem hx hy))
lemma mem_generate_iff {s : set $ set α} {U : set α} :
U ∈ generate s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, finite t ∧ ⋂₀ t ⊆ U :=
begin
split ; intro h,
{ induction h with V V_in V W V_in hVW hV V W V_in W_in hV hW,
{ use {V},
simp [V_in] },
{ use ∅,
simp [subset.refl, univ] },
{ rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, htfin, hinter⟩,
exact ⟨t, hts, htfin, hinter.trans hVW⟩ },
{ rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, htfin, htinter⟩,
rcases hW with ⟨z, hzs, hzfin, hzinter⟩,
refine ⟨t ∪ z, union_subset hts hzs, htfin.union hzfin, _⟩,
rw sInter_union,
exact inter_subset_inter htinter hzinter } },
{ rcases h with ⟨t, ts, tfin, h⟩,
apply generate_sets.superset _ h,
revert ts,
apply finite.induction_on tfin,
{ intro h,
rw sInter_empty,
exact generate_sets.univ },
{ intros V r hV rfin hinter h,
cases insert_subset.mp h with V_in r_sub,
rw [insert_eq V r, sInter_union],
apply generate_sets.inter _ (hinter r_sub),
rw sInter_singleton,
exact generate_sets.basic V_in } },
end
/-- `mk_of_closure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : set (set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mk_of_closure (s : set (set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : filter α :=
{ sets := s,
univ_sets := hs ▸ (univ_mem : univ ∈ generate s),
sets_of_superset := λ x y, hs ▸ (mem_of_superset : x ∈ generate s → x ⊆ y → y ∈ generate s),
inter_sets := λ x y, hs ▸ (inter_mem : x ∈ generate s → y ∈ generate s →
x ∩ y ∈ generate s) }
lemma mk_of_closure_sets {s : set (set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
filter.mk_of_closure s hs = generate s :=
filter.ext $ λ u,
show u ∈ (filter.mk_of_closure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets, from hs.symm ▸ iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def gi_generate (α : Type*) :
@galois_insertion (set (set α)) (order_dual (filter α)) _ _ filter.generate filter.sets :=
{ gc := λ s f, sets_iff_generate,
le_l_u := λ f u h, generate_sets.basic h,
choice := λ s hs, filter.mk_of_closure s (le_antisymm hs $ sets_iff_generate.1 $ le_rfl),
choice_eq := λ s hs, mk_of_closure_sets }
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : has_inf (filter α) := ⟨λf g : filter α,
{ sets := {s | ∃ (a ∈ f) (b ∈ g), s = a ∩ b },
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem, _, univ_mem, by simp⟩,
sets_of_superset := begin
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ xy,
refine ⟨a ∪ y, mem_of_superset ha (subset_union_left a y),
b ∪ y, mem_of_superset hb (subset_union_left b y), _⟩,
rw [← inter_union_distrib_right, union_eq_self_of_subset_left xy]
end,
inter_sets := begin
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨a ∩ c, inter_mem ha hc, b ∩ d, inter_mem hb hd, _⟩,
ac_refl
end }⟩
lemma mem_inf_iff {f g : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ := iff.rfl
lemma mem_inf_of_left {f g : filter α} {s : set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
lemma mem_inf_of_right {f g : filter α} {s : set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
lemma inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : filter α} {s t : set α}
(hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
lemma mem_inf_of_inter {f g : filter α} {s t u : set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) (h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) :
u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
lemma mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨λ ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, eq⟩, ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, eq ▸ subset.rfl⟩,
λ ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, sub⟩, mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
instance : has_top (filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := {s | ∀ x, x ∈ s},
univ_sets := λ x, mem_univ x,
sets_of_superset := λ x y hx hxy a, hxy (hx a),
inter_sets := λ x y hx hy a, mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
lemma mem_top_iff_forall {s : set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : filter α) ↔ (∀ x, x ∈ s) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_top {s : set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : filter α) ↔ s = univ :=
by rw [mem_top_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
section complete_lattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for the lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
private def original_complete_lattice : complete_lattice (filter α) :=
@order_dual.complete_lattice _ (gi_generate α).lift_complete_lattice
local attribute [instance] original_complete_lattice
instance : complete_lattice (filter α) := original_complete_lattice.copy
/- le -/ filter.partial_order.le rfl
/- top -/ (filter.has_top).1
(top_unique $ λ s hs, by simp [mem_top.1 hs])
/- bot -/ _ rfl
/- sup -/ _ rfl
/- inf -/ (filter.has_inf).1
begin
ext f g : 2,
exact le_antisymm
(le_inf (λ s, mem_inf_of_left) (λ s, mem_inf_of_right))
(begin
rintro s ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩,
exact inter_sets _ (@inf_le_left (filter α) _ _ _ _ ha)
(@inf_le_right (filter α) _ _ _ _ hb)
end)
end
/- Sup -/ (join ∘ 𝓟) (by { ext s x, exact (@mem_bInter_iff _ _ s filter.sets x).symm.trans
(set.ext_iff.1 (sInter_image _ _) x).symm})
/- Inf -/ _ rfl
end complete_lattice
/-- A filter is `ne_bot` if it is not equal to `⊥`, or equivalently the empty set
does not belong to the filter. Bourbaki include this assumption in the definition
of a filter but we prefer to have a `complete_lattice` structure on filter, so
we use a typeclass argument in lemmas instead. -/
class ne_bot (f : filter α) : Prop := (ne' : f ≠ ⊥)
lemma ne_bot_iff {f : filter α} : ne_bot f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ := ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma ne_bot.ne {f : filter α} (hf : ne_bot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := ne_bot.ne'
@[simp] lemma not_ne_bot {α : Type*} {f : filter α} : ¬ f.ne_bot ↔ f = ⊥ :=
not_iff_comm.1 ne_bot_iff.symm
lemma ne_bot.mono {f g : filter α} (hf : ne_bot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : ne_bot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
lemma ne_bot_of_le {f g : filter α} [hf : ne_bot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : ne_bot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] lemma sup_ne_bot {f g : filter α} : ne_bot (f ⊔ g) ↔ ne_bot f ∨ ne_bot g :=
by simp [ne_bot_iff, not_and_distrib]
lemma bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : filter α).sets = univ := rfl
lemma sup_sets_eq {f g : filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(gi_generate α).gc.u_inf
lemma Sup_sets_eq {s : set (filter α)} : (Sup s).sets = (⋂ f ∈ s, (f : filter α).sets) :=
(gi_generate α).gc.u_Inf
lemma supr_sets_eq {f : ι → filter α} : (supr f).sets = (⋂ i, (f i).sets) :=
(gi_generate α).gc.u_infi
lemma generate_empty : filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : filter α) :=
(gi_generate α).gc.l_bot
lemma generate_univ : filter.generate univ = (⊥ : filter α) :=
mk_of_closure_sets.symm
lemma generate_union {s t : set (set α)} :
filter.generate (s ∪ t) = filter.generate s ⊓ filter.generate t :=
(gi_generate α).gc.l_sup
lemma generate_Union {s : ι → set (set α)} :
filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = (⨅ i, filter.generate (s i)) :=
(gi_generate α).gc.l_supr
@[simp] lemma mem_bot {s : set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : filter α) :=
trivial
@[simp] lemma mem_sup {f g : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
iff.rfl
lemma union_mem_sup {f g : filter α} {s t : set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs (subset_union_left s t), mem_of_superset ht (subset_union_right s t)⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_Sup {x : set α} {s : set (filter α)} :
x ∈ Sup s ↔ (∀ f ∈ s, x ∈ (f : filter α)) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_supr {x : set α} {f : ι → filter α} :
x ∈ supr f ↔ (∀ i, x ∈ f i) :=
by simp only [← filter.mem_sets, supr_sets_eq, iff_self, mem_Inter]
@[simp] lemma supr_ne_bot {f : ι → filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).ne_bot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).ne_bot :=
by simp [ne_bot_iff]
lemma infi_eq_generate (s : ι → filter α) : infi s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
show generate _ = generate _, from congr_arg _ $ congr_arg Sup $ (range_comp _ _).symm
lemma mem_infi_of_mem {f : ι → filter α} (i : ι) : ∀ {s}, s ∈ f i → s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
show (⨅ i, f i) ≤ f i, from infi_le _ _
lemma mem_infi_of_Inter {ι} {s : ι → filter α} {U : set α} {I : set ι} (I_fin : finite I)
{V : I → set α} (hV : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i) (hU : (⋂ i, V i) ⊆ U) : U ∈ ⨅ i, s i :=
begin
haveI := I_fin.fintype,
refine mem_of_superset (Inter_mem.2 $ λ i, _) hU,
exact mem_infi_of_mem i (hV _)
end
lemma mem_infi {ι} {s : ι → filter α} {U : set α} : (U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔
∃ I : set ι, finite I ∧ ∃ V : I → set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i :=
begin
split,
{ rw [infi_eq_generate, mem_generate_iff],
rintro ⟨t, tsub, tfin, tinter⟩,
rcases eq_finite_Union_of_finite_subset_Union tfin tsub with ⟨I, Ifin, σ, σfin, σsub, rfl⟩,
rw sInter_Union at tinter,
set V := λ i, U ∪ ⋂₀ σ i with hV,
have V_in : ∀ i, V i ∈ s i,
{ rintro i,
have : (⋂₀ σ i) ∈ s i,
{ rw sInter_mem (σfin _),
apply σsub },
exact mem_of_superset this (subset_union_right _ _) },
refine ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, _⟩,
rwa [hV, ← union_Inter, union_eq_self_of_subset_right] },
{ rintro ⟨I, Ifin, V, V_in, rfl⟩,
exact mem_infi_of_Inter Ifin V_in subset.rfl }
end
lemma mem_infi' {ι} {s : ι → filter α} {U : set α} : (U ∈ ⨅ i, s i) ↔
∃ I : set ι, finite I ∧ ∃ V : ι → set α, (∀ i, V i ∈ s i) ∧
(∀ i ∉ I, V i = univ) ∧ (U = ⋂ i ∈ I, V i) ∧ U = ⋂ i, V i :=
begin
simp only [mem_infi, set_coe.forall', bInter_eq_Inter],
refine ⟨_, λ ⟨I, If, V, hVs, _, hVU, _⟩, ⟨I, If, λ i, V i, λ i, hVs i, hVU⟩⟩,
rintro ⟨I, If, V, hV, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨I, If, λ i, if hi : i ∈ I then V ⟨i, hi⟩ else univ, λ i, _, λ i hi, _, _⟩,
{ split_ifs, exacts [hV _, univ_mem] },
{ exact dif_neg hi },
{ simp [Inter_dite, bInter_eq_Inter] }
end
lemma exists_Inter_of_mem_infi {ι : Type*} {α : Type*} {f : ι → filter α} {s}
(hs : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i) : ∃ t : ι → set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i :=
let ⟨I, If, V, hVs, hV', hVU, hVU'⟩ := mem_infi'.1 hs in ⟨V, hVs, hVU'⟩
lemma mem_infi_of_fintype {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {α : Type*} {f : ι → filter α} (s) :
s ∈ (⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ t : ι → set α, (∀ i, t i ∈ f i) ∧ s = ⋂ i, t i :=
begin
refine ⟨exists_Inter_of_mem_infi, _⟩,
rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩,
exact Inter_mem.2 (λ i, mem_infi_of_mem i (ht i))
end
@[simp] lemma le_principal_iff {s : set α} {f : filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
show (∀ {t}, s ⊆ t → t ∈ f) ↔ s ∈ f,
from ⟨λ h, h (subset.refl s), λ hs t ht, mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
lemma principal_mono {s t : set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
by simp only [le_principal_iff, iff_self, mem_principal]
@[mono] lemma monotone_principal : monotone (𝓟 : set α → filter α) :=
λ _ _, principal_mono.2
@[simp] lemma principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; refl
@[simp] lemma join_principal_eq_Sup {s : set (filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = Sup s := rfl
@[simp] lemma principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ λ s _, empty_subset _
lemma generate_eq_binfi (S : set (set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ f, by simp [sets_iff_generate, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
lemma empty_mem_iff_bot {f : filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨λ h, bot_unique $ λ s _, mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s),
λ h, h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
lemma nonempty_of_mem {f : filter α} [hf : ne_bot f] {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ f) :
s.nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ h, absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
lemma ne_bot.nonempty_of_mem {f : filter α} (hf : ne_bot f) {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ f) :
s.nonempty :=
@nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp] lemma empty_not_mem (f : filter α) [ne_bot f] : ¬(∅ ∈ f) :=
λ h, (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
lemma nonempty_of_ne_bot (f : filter α) [ne_bot f] : nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists $ nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
lemma compl_not_mem {f : filter α} {s : set α} [ne_bot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f :=
λ hsc, (nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty $ inter_compl_self s
lemma filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty [is_empty α] (f : filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp $ univ_mem' is_empty_elim
lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : filter α} {s t : set α} (h : disjoint s t)
(hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : disjoint f g :=
begin
refine le_of_eq (empty_mem_iff_bot.1 _),
rw [← set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 h],
exact inter_mem_inf hs ht
end
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. --/
-- TODO[gh-6025]: make this globally an instance once safe to do so
local attribute [instance]
protected def unique [is_empty α] : unique (filter α) :=
{ default := ⊥, uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty }
lemma forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot {f : filter α} :
(∀ (s : set α), s ∈ f → s.nonempty) ↔ ne_bot f :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ hf, empty_not_nonempty (h ∅ $ hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
lemma nontrivial_iff_nonempty : nontrivial (filter α) ↔ nonempty α :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨f, g, hfg⟩⟩, by_contra $
λ h, hfg $ by haveI : is_empty α := not_nonempty_iff.1 h; exact subsingleton.elim _ _,
λ ⟨x⟩, ⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, ne_bot.ne $ forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.1 $ λ s hs,
by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]⟩⟩⟩
lemma eq_Inf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : set (filter α)} {l : filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = Inf S :=
le_antisymm (le_Inf $ λ f hf s hs, h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
(λ s hs, let ⟨f, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs in (Inf_le hf : Inf S ≤ f) hs)
lemma eq_infi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → filter α} {l : filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) :
l = infi f :=
eq_Inf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem $ λ s, h.trans exists_range_iff.symm
lemma eq_binfi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (_ : p i), s ∈ f i) :
l = ⨅ i (_ : p i), f i :=
begin
rw [infi_subtype'],
apply eq_infi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem,
intro s,
exact h.trans ⟨λ ⟨i, pi, si⟩, ⟨⟨i, pi⟩, si⟩, λ ⟨⟨i, pi⟩, si⟩, ⟨i, pi, si⟩⟩
end
lemma infi_sets_eq {f : ι → filter α} (h : directed (≥) f) [ne : nonempty ι] :
(infi f).sets = (⋃ i, (f i).sets) :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne, u := { filter .
sets := (⋃ i, (f i).sets),
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_Union]; exact ⟨i, univ_mem⟩,
sets_of_superset := by simp only [mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib];
intros x y i hx hxy; exact ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩,
inter_sets :=
begin
simp only [mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib],
intros x y a hx b hy,
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩,
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩
end } in
have u = infi f, from eq_infi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem
(λ s, by simp only [filter.mem_mk, mem_Union, filter.mem_sets]),
congr_arg filter.sets this.symm
lemma mem_infi_of_directed {f : ι → filter α} (h : directed (≥) f) [nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ infi f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i :=
by simp only [← filter.mem_sets, infi_sets_eq h, mem_Union]
lemma mem_binfi_of_directed {f : β → filter α} {s : set β}
(h : directed_on (f ⁻¹'o (≥)) s) (ne : s.nonempty) {t : set α} :
t ∈ (⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i :=
by haveI : nonempty {x // x ∈ s} := ne.to_subtype;
erw [infi_subtype', mem_infi_of_directed h.directed_coe, subtype.exists]; refl
lemma binfi_sets_eq {f : β → filter α} {s : set β}
(h : directed_on (f ⁻¹'o (≥)) s) (ne : s.nonempty) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext $ λ t, by simp [mem_binfi_of_directed h ne]
lemma infi_sets_eq_finite {ι : Type*} (f : ι → filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = (⋃ t : finset ι, (⨅ i ∈ t, f i).sets) :=
begin
rw [infi_eq_infi_finset, infi_sets_eq],
exact (directed_of_sup $ λ s₁ s₂ hs, infi_le_infi $ λ i, infi_le_infi_const $ λ h, hs h),
end
lemma infi_sets_eq_finite' (f : ι → filter α) :
(⨅ i, f i).sets = (⋃ t : finset (plift ι), (⨅ i ∈ t, f (plift.down i)).sets) :=
by { rw [← infi_sets_eq_finite, ← equiv.plift.surjective.infi_comp], refl }
lemma mem_infi_finite {ι : Type*} {f : ι → filter α} (s) :
s ∈ infi f ↔ ∃ t : finset ι, s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f i :=
(set.ext_iff.1 (infi_sets_eq_finite f) s).trans mem_Union
lemma mem_infi_finite' {f : ι → filter α} (s) :
s ∈ infi f ↔ ∃ t : finset (plift ι), s ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, f (plift.down i) :=
(set.ext_iff.1 (infi_sets_eq_finite' f) s).trans mem_Union
@[simp] lemma sup_join {f₁ f₂ : filter (filter α)} : (join f₁ ⊔ join f₂) = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
filter.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp] lemma supr_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → filter (filter α)} :
(⨆ x, join (f x)) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
filter.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_supr, mem_join]
instance : bounded_distrib_lattice (filter α) :=
{ le_sup_inf :=
begin
intros x y z s,
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp],
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl,
exact ⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs (inter_subset_left t₁ t₂),
ht₁,
t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs (inter_subset_right t₁ t₂),
ht₂,
rfl⟩
end,
..filter.complete_lattice }
/- the complementary version with ⨆ i, f ⊓ g i does not hold! -/
lemma infi_sup_left {f : filter α} {g : ι → filter α} : (⨅ x, f ⊔ g x) = f ⊔ infi g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_infi $ λ i, sup_le_sup_left (infi_le _ _) _),
rintro t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
rw [infi_sets_eq_finite'] at h₂,
simp only [mem_Union, (finset.inf_eq_infi _ _).symm] at h₂,
rcases h₂ with ⟨s, hs⟩,
suffices : (⨅ i, f ⊔ g i) ≤ f ⊔ s.inf (λ i, g i.down), { exact this ⟨h₁, hs⟩ },
refine finset.induction_on s _ _,
{ exact le_sup_of_le_right le_top },
{ rintro ⟨i⟩ s his ih,
rw [finset.inf_insert, sup_inf_left],
exact le_inf (infi_le _ _) ih }
end
lemma infi_sup_right {f : filter α} {g : ι → filter α} : (⨅ x, g x ⊔ f) = infi g ⊔ f :=
by simp [sup_comm, ← infi_sup_left]
lemma binfi_sup_right (p : ι → Prop) (f : ι → filter α) (g : filter α) :
(⨅ i (h : p i), (f i ⊔ g)) = (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) ⊔ g :=
by rw [infi_subtype', infi_sup_right, infi_subtype']
lemma binfi_sup_left (p : ι → Prop) (f : ι → filter α) (g : filter α) :
(⨅ i (h : p i), (g ⊔ f i)) = g ⊔ (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) :=
by rw [infi_subtype', infi_sup_left, infi_subtype']
lemma mem_infi_finset {s : finset α} {f : α → filter β} {t : set β} :
t ∈ (⨅ a ∈ s, f a) ↔ (∃ p : α → set β, (∀ a ∈ s, p a ∈ f a) ∧ t = ⋂ a ∈ s, p a) :=
begin
simp only [← finset.set_bInter_coe, bInter_eq_Inter, infi_subtype'],
refine ⟨λ h, _, _⟩,
{ rcases (mem_infi_of_fintype _).1 h with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨λ a, if h : a ∈ s then p ⟨a, h⟩ else univ, λ a ha, by simpa [ha] using hp ⟨a, ha⟩, _⟩,
refine Inter_congr id surjective_id _,
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩, simp [ha] },
{ rintro ⟨p, hpf, rfl⟩,
exact Inter_mem.2 (λ a, mem_infi_of_mem a (hpf a a.2)) }
end
/-- If `f : ι → filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `infi f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `infi_ne_bot_of_directed` for a version assuming `nonempty α` instead of `nonempty ι`. -/
lemma infi_ne_bot_of_directed' {f : ι → filter α} [nonempty ι]
(hd : directed (≥) f) (hb : ∀ i, ne_bot (f i)) : ne_bot (infi f) :=
⟨begin
intro h,
have he : ∅ ∈ (infi f), from h.symm ▸ (mem_bot : ∅ ∈ (⊥ : filter α)),
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, ∅ ∈ f i,
from (mem_infi_of_directed hd ∅).1 he,
exact (hb i).ne (empty_mem_iff_bot.1 hi)
end⟩
/-- If `f : ι → filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `infi f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `infi_ne_bot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `nonempty ι` instead of `nonempty α`. -/
lemma infi_ne_bot_of_directed {f : ι → filter α}
[hn : nonempty α] (hd : directed (≥) f) (hb : ∀ i, ne_bot (f i)) : ne_bot (infi f) :=
if hι : nonempty ι then @infi_ne_bot_of_directed' _ _ _ hι hd hb else
⟨λ h : infi f = ⊥,
have univ ⊆ (∅ : set α),
begin
rw [←principal_mono, principal_univ, principal_empty, ←h],
exact (le_infi $ λ i, false.elim $ hι ⟨i⟩)
end,
let ⟨x⟩ := hn in this (mem_univ x)⟩
lemma infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → filter α} [nonempty ι] (hd : directed (≥) f) :
ne_bot (infi f) ↔ ∀ i, ne_bot (f i) :=
⟨λ H i, H.mono (infi_le _ i), infi_ne_bot_of_directed' hd⟩
lemma infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → filter α} [nonempty α] (hd : directed (≥) f) :
ne_bot (infi f) ↔ (∀ i, ne_bot (f i)) :=
⟨λ H i, H.mono (infi_le _ i), infi_ne_bot_of_directed hd⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma infi_sets_induct {f : ι → filter α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ infi f) {p : set α → Prop}
(uni : p univ)
(ins : ∀ {i s₁ s₂}, s₁ ∈ f i → p s₂ → p (s₁ ∩ s₂)) : p s :=
begin
rw [mem_infi_finite'] at hs,
simp only [← finset.inf_eq_infi] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨is, his⟩,
revert s,
refine finset.induction_on is _ _,
{ intros s hs, rwa [mem_top.1 hs] },
{ rintro ⟨i⟩ js his ih s hs,
rw [finset.inf_insert, mem_inf_iff] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, rfl⟩,
exact ins hs₁ (ih hs₂) }
end
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp] lemma inf_principal {s t : set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, subset.rfl, t, subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp] lemma sup_principal {s t : set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
filter.ext $ λ u, by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp] lemma supr_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → set α} : (⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x)) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
filter.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_supr, mem_principal, Union_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma principal_eq_bot_iff {s : set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans $ mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma principal_ne_bot_iff {s : set α} : ne_bot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.nonempty :=
ne_bot_iff.trans $ (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans ne_empty_iff_nonempty
lemma is_compl_principal (s : set α) : is_compl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
⟨by simp only [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty, le_refl],
by simp only [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ, le_refl]⟩
theorem mem_inf_principal {f : filter α} {s t : set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ {x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s} ∈ f :=
begin
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (is_compl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint, inf_assoc,
inf_principal, imp_iff_not_or],
rw [← disjoint, ← (is_compl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl],
refl
end
lemma supr_inf_principal (f : ι → filter α) (s : set α) :
(⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s) = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
by { ext, simp only [mem_supr, mem_inf_principal] }
lemma inf_principal_eq_bot {f : filter α} {s : set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f :=
by { rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal], refl }
lemma mem_of_eq_bot {f : filter α} {s : set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f :=
by rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
lemma diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : filter α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
begin
rw mem_inf_principal,
filter_upwards [hs],
intros a has hat,
exact ⟨has, hat⟩
end
lemma principal_le_iff {s : set α} {f : filter α} :
𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V :=
begin
change (∀ V, V ∈ f → V ∈ _) ↔ _,
simp_rw mem_principal,
end
@[simp] lemma infi_principal_finset {ι : Type w} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → set α) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i)) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction_on with i s hi hs,
{ simp },
{ rw [finset.infi_insert, finset.set_bInter_insert, hs, inf_principal] },
end
@[simp] lemma infi_principal_fintype {ι : Type w} [fintype ι] (f : ι → set α) :
(⨅ i, 𝓟 (f i)) = 𝓟 (⋂ i, f i) :=
by simpa using infi_principal_finset finset.univ f
lemma infi_principal_finite {ι : Type w} {s : set ι} (hs : finite s) (f : ι → set α) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, 𝓟 (f i)) = 𝓟 (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
begin
lift s to finset ι using hs,
exact_mod_cast infi_principal_finset s f
end
end lattice
@[mono] lemma join_mono {f₁ f₂ : filter (filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) :
join f₁ ≤ join f₂ :=
λ s hs, h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
/-- `f.eventually p` or `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | p x} ∈ f`. E.g., `∀ᶠ x in at_top, p x`
means that `p` holds true for sufficiently large `x`. -/
protected def eventually (p : α → Prop) (f : filter α) : Prop := {x | p x} ∈ f
notation `∀ᶠ` binders ` in ` f `, ` r:(scoped p, filter.eventually p f) := r
lemma eventually_iff {f : filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ {x | P x} ∈ f :=
iff.rfl
protected lemma ext' {f₁ f₂ : filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x)) :
f₁ = f₂ :=
filter.ext h
lemma eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
lemma eventually_of_mem {f : filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : set α} (hU : U ∈ f) (h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) :
∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected lemma eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : filter α} :
f.eventually p → f.eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp]
lemma eventually_true (f : filter α) : ∀ᶠ x in f, true := univ_mem
lemma eventually_of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp] lemma eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, false) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp] lemma eventually_const {f : filter α} [t : ne_bot f] {p : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p) ↔ p :=
classical.by_cases (λ h : p, by simp [h]) (λ h, by simpa [h] using t.ne)
lemma eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
lemma eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
lemma eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) :
∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
lemma eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (eventually_of_forall hq)
@[simp] lemma eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
inter_mem_iff
lemma eventually.congr {f : filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono $ λ x hx, hx.mp)
lemma eventually_congr {f : filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
⟨λ hp, hp.congr h, λ hq, hq.congr $ by simpa only [iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp] lemma eventually_all {ι} [fintype ι] {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p i x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x :=
by simpa only [filter.eventually, set_of_forall] using Inter_mem
@[simp] lemma eventually_all_finite {ι} {I : set ι} (hI : I.finite) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ (∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x) :=
by simpa only [filter.eventually, set_of_forall] using bInter_mem hI
alias eventually_all_finite ← set.finite.eventually_all
attribute [protected] set.finite.eventually_all
@[simp] lemma eventually_all_finset {ι} (I : finset ι) {l} {p : ι → α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i ∈ I, p i x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ᶠ x in l, p i x :=
I.finite_to_set.eventually_all
alias eventually_all_finset ← finset.eventually_all
attribute [protected] finset.eventually_all
@[simp] lemma eventually_or_distrib_left {f : filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ (p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
classical.by_cases (λ h : p, by simp [h]) (λ h, by simp [h])
@[simp] lemma eventually_or_distrib_right {f : filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ ((∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q) :=
by simp only [or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp] lemma eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ (p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
by simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
lemma eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := ⟨⟩
@[simp]
lemma eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ (∀ x, p x) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ (∀ᶠ x in g, p x) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma eventually_Sup {p : α → Prop} {fs : set (filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in Sup fs, p x) ↔ (∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma eventually_supr {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in (⨆ b, fs b), p x) ↔ (∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x) :=
mem_supr
@[simp]
lemma eventually_principal {a : set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ a, p x) :=
iff.rfl
lemma eventually_inf {f g : filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ (s ∈ f) (t ∈ g), ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
/-! ### Frequently -/
/-- `f.frequently p` or `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` mean that `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`. E.g., `∃ᶠ x in at_top, p x`
means that there exist arbitrarily large `x` for which `p` holds true. -/
protected def frequently (p : α → Prop) (f : filter α) : Prop := ¬∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x
notation `∃ᶠ` binders ` in ` f `, ` r:(scoped p, filter.frequently p f) := r
lemma eventually.frequently {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
lemma frequently_of_forall {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
eventually.frequently (eventually_of_forall h)
lemma frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (λ hq, hq.mp $ hpq.mono $ λ x, mt) h
lemma frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (λ h', h'.filter_mono hle) h
lemma frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (eventually_of_forall hpq)
lemma frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : filter α}
(hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
begin
refine mt (λ h, hq.mp $ h.mono _) hp,
exact λ x hpq hq hp, hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
end
lemma eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : filter α}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) (hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
by simpa only [and.comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
lemma frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x :=
begin
by_contradiction H,
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬ p x, from eventually_of_forall (not_exists.1 H),
exact hp H
end
lemma eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨λ hp q hq, (hp.and_eventually hq).exists,
λ H hp, by simpa only [and_not_self, exists_false] using H hp⟩
lemma frequently_iff {f : filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x :=
begin
rw frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and,
split ; intro h,
{ intros U U_in,
simpa [exists_prop, and_comm] using h U_in },
{ intros H H',
simpa [and_comm] using h H' },
end
@[simp] lemma not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : filter α} :
(¬ ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, ¬ p x) :=
by simp [filter.frequently]
@[simp] lemma not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : filter α} :
(¬ ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, ¬ p x) :=
by simp only [filter.frequently, not_not]
@[simp] lemma frequently_true_iff_ne_bot (f : filter α) : (∃ᶠ x in f, true) ↔ ne_bot f :=
by simp [filter.frequently, -not_eventually, eventually_false_iff_eq_bot, ne_bot_iff]
@[simp] lemma frequently_false (f : filter α) : ¬ ∃ᶠ x in f, false := by simp
@[simp] lemma frequently_const {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {p : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p) ↔ p :=
classical.by_cases (λ h : p, by simpa [h]) (λ h, by simp [h])
@[simp] lemma frequently_or_distrib {f : filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ (∃ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
by simp only [filter.frequently, ← not_and_distrib, not_or_distrib, eventually_and]
lemma frequently_or_distrib_left {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ (p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
by simp
lemma frequently_or_distrib_right {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma frequently_imp_distrib {f : filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ ((∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
by simp [imp_iff_not_or, not_eventually, frequently_or_distrib]
lemma frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ (p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
by simp
lemma frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ ((∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q) :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ ((∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q) :=
by simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp] lemma frequently_and_distrib_left {f : filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ (p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) :=
by simp only [filter.frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, not_imp]
@[simp] lemma frequently_and_distrib_right {f : filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ ((∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q) :=
by simp only [and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp] lemma frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬ ∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
lemma frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ (∃ x, p x) :=
by simp [filter.frequently]
@[simp]
lemma frequently_principal {a : set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ (∃ x ∈ a, p x) :=
by simp [filter.frequently, not_forall]
lemma frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ (∃ᶠ x in g, p x) :=
by simp only [filter.frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_distrib]
@[simp]
lemma frequently_Sup {p : α → Prop} {fs : set (filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in Sup fs, p x) ↔ (∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) :=
by simp [filter.frequently, -not_eventually, not_forall]
@[simp]
lemma frequently_supr {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in (⨆ b, fs b), p x) ↔ (∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x) :=
by simp [filter.frequently, -not_eventually, not_forall]
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
/-- Two functions `f` and `g` are *eventually equal* along a filter `l` if the set of `x` such that
`f x = g x` belongs to `l`. -/
def eventually_eq (l : filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop := ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x
notation f ` =ᶠ[`:50 l:50 `] `:0 g:50 := eventually_eq l f g
lemma eventually_eq.eventually {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x :=
h
lemma eventually_eq.rw {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) :
∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr $ h.mono $ λ x hx, hx ▸ iff.rfl
lemma eventually_eq_set {s t : set α} {l : filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr $ eventually_of_forall $ λ x, ⟨eq.to_iff, iff.to_eq⟩
alias eventually_eq_set ↔ filter.eventually_eq.mem_iff filter.eventually.set_eq
lemma eventually_eq.exists_mem {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, eq_on f g s :=
h.exists_mem
lemma eventually_eq_of_mem {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : set α}
(hs : s ∈ l) (h : eq_on f g s) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
lemma eventually_eq_iff_exists_mem {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} :
(f =ᶠ[l] g) ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, eq_on f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
lemma eventually_eq.filter_mono {l l' : filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl] lemma eventually_eq.refl (l : filter α) (f : α → β) :
f =ᶠ[l] f :=
eventually_of_forall $ λ x, rfl
lemma eventually_eq.rfl {l : filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f := eventually_eq.refl l f
@[symm] lemma eventually_eq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono $ λ _, eq.symm
@[trans] lemma eventually_eq.trans {f g h : α → β} {l : filter α}
(H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (λ x y, f x = y) H₁
lemma eventually_eq.prod_mk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(λ x, (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] (λ x, (f' x, g' x)) :=
hf.mp $ hg.mono $ by { intros, simp only * }
lemma eventually_eq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
(h ∘ f) =ᶠ[l] (h ∘ g) :=
H.mono $ λ x hx, congr_arg h hx
lemma eventually_eq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(λ x, h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] (λ x, h (f' x) (g' x)) :=
(Hf.prod_mk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
lemma eventually_eq.mul [has_mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') :
((λ x, f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] (λ x, g x * g' x)) :=
h.comp₂ (*) h'
@[to_additive]
lemma eventually_eq.inv [has_inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
((λ x, (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] (λ x, (g x)⁻¹)) :=
h.fun_comp has_inv.inv
lemma eventually_eq.div [group_with_zero β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') :
((λ x, f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] (λ x, g x / g' x)) :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul h'.inv
lemma eventually_eq.div' [group β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') :
((λ x, f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] (λ x, g x / g' x)) :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul h'.inv
lemma eventually_eq.sub [add_group β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') :
((λ x, f x - f' x) =ᶠ[l] (λ x, g x - g' x)) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add h'.neg
lemma eventually_eq.inter {s t s' t' : set α} {l : filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : set α) :=
h.comp₂ (∧) h'
lemma eventually_eq.union {s t s' t' : set α} {l : filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : set α) :=
h.comp₂ (∨) h'
lemma eventually_eq.compl {s t : set α} {l : filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : set α) :=
h.fun_comp not
lemma eventually_eq.diff {s t s' t' : set α} {l : filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
lemma eventually_eq_empty {s : set α} {l : filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventually_eq_set.trans $ by simp
lemma inter_eventually_eq_left {s t : set α} {l : filter α} :
(s ∩ t : set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
by simp only [eventually_eq_set, mem_inter_eq, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
lemma inter_eventually_eq_right {s t : set α} {l : filter α} :
(s ∩ t : set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s :=
by rw [inter_comm, inter_eventually_eq_left]
@[simp] lemma eventually_eq_principal {s : set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ eq_on f g s :=
iff.rfl
lemma eventually_eq_inf_principal_iff {F : filter α} {s : set α} {f g : α → β} :
(f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
lemma eventually_eq.sub_eq [add_group β] {f g : α → β} {l : filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
by simpa using (eventually_eq.sub (eventually_eq.refl l f) h).symm
lemma eventually_eq_iff_sub [add_group β] {f g : α → β} {l : filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨λ h, h.sub_eq, λ h, by simpa using h.add (eventually_eq.refl l g)⟩
section has_le
variables [has_le β] {l : filter α}
/-- A function `f` is eventually less than or equal to a function `g` at a filter `l`. -/
def eventually_le (l : filter α) (f g : α → β) : Prop := ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x
notation f ` ≤ᶠ[`:50 l:50 `] `:0 g:50 := eventually_le l f g
lemma eventually_le.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp $ hg.mp $ hf.mono $ λ x hf hg H, by rwa [hf, hg] at H
lemma eventually_le_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨λ H, H.congr hf hg, λ H, H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
end has_le
section preorder
variables [preorder β] {l : filter α} {f g h : α → β}
lemma eventually_eq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g := h.mono $ λ x, le_of_eq
@[refl] lemma eventually_le.refl (l : filter α) (f : α → β) :
f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
eventually_eq.rfl.le
lemma eventually_le.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f := eventually_le.refl l f
@[trans] lemma eventually_le.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp $ H₁.mono $ λ x, le_trans
@[trans] lemma eventually_eq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
@[trans] lemma eventually_le.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
end preorder
lemma eventually_le.antisymm [partial_order β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp $ h₁.mono $ λ x, le_antisymm
lemma eventually_le_antisymm_iff [partial_order β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
by simp only [eventually_eq, eventually_le, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
lemma eventually_le.le_iff_eq [partial_order β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨λ h', h'.antisymm h, eventually_eq.le⟩
lemma eventually.ne_of_lt [preorder β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono (λ x hx, hx.ne)
lemma eventually.ne_top_of_lt [partial_order β] [order_top β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono (λ x hx, hx.ne_top)
lemma eventually.lt_top_of_ne [partial_order β] [order_top β] {l : filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono (λ x hx, hx.lt_top)
lemma eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [partial_order β] [order_top β] {l : filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨eventually.ne_of_lt, eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono] lemma eventually_le.inter {s t s' t' : set α} {l : filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t)
(h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : set α) :=
h'.mp $ h.mono $ λ x, and.imp
@[mono] lemma eventually_le.union {s t s' t' : set α} {l : filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t)
(h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : set α) :=
h'.mp $ h.mono $ λ x, or.imp
@[mono] lemma eventually_le.compl {s t : set α} {l : filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : set α) :=
h.mono $ λ x, mt
@[mono] lemma eventually_le.diff {s t s' t' : set α} {l : filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t)
(h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
lemma join_le {f : filter (filter α)} {l : filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
λ s hs, h.mono $ λ m hm, hm hs
/-! ### Push-forwards, pull-backs, and the monad structure -/
section map
/-- The forward map of a filter -/
def map (m : α → β) (f : filter α) : filter β :=
{ sets := preimage m ⁻¹' f.sets,
univ_sets := univ_mem,
sets_of_superset := λ s t hs st, mem_of_superset hs $ preimage_mono st,
inter_sets := λ s t hs ht, inter_mem hs ht }
@[simp] lemma map_principal {s : set α} {f : α → β} :
map f (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (set.image f s) :=
filter.ext $ λ a, image_subset_iff.symm
variables {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : set α} {t : set β}
@[simp] lemma eventually_map {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∀ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma frequently_map {P : β → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ b in map m f, P b) ↔ ∃ᶠ a in f, P (m a) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_map : t ∈ map m f ↔ m ⁻¹' t ∈ f := iff.rfl
lemma mem_map' : t ∈ map m f ↔ {x | m x ∈ t} ∈ f := iff.rfl
lemma image_mem_map (hs : s ∈ f) : m '' s ∈ map m f :=
f.sets_of_superset hs $ subset_preimage_image m s
lemma image_mem_map_iff (hf : injective m) : m '' s ∈ map m f ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨λ h, by rwa [← preimage_image_eq s hf], image_mem_map⟩
lemma range_mem_map : range m ∈ map m f :=
by { rw ←image_univ, exact image_mem_map univ_mem }
lemma mem_map_iff_exists_image : t ∈ map m f ↔ (∃ s ∈ f, m '' s ⊆ t) :=
⟨λ ht, ⟨m ⁻¹' t, ht, image_preimage_subset _ _⟩,
λ ⟨s, hs, ht⟩, mem_of_superset (image_mem_map hs) ht⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id : filter.map id f = f :=
filter_eq $ rfl
@[simp] lemma map_id' : filter.map (λ x, x) f = f := map_id
@[simp] lemma map_compose : filter.map m' ∘ filter.map m = filter.map (m' ∘ m) :=
funext $ λ _, filter_eq $ rfl
@[simp] lemma map_map : filter.map m' (filter.map m f) = filter.map (m' ∘ m) f :=
congr_fun (@@filter.map_compose m m') f
/-- If functions `m₁` and `m₂` are eventually equal at a filter `f`, then
they map this filter to the same filter. -/
lemma map_congr {m₁ m₂ : α → β} {f : filter α} (h : m₁ =ᶠ[f] m₂) :
map m₁ f = map m₂ f :=
filter.ext' $ λ p,
by { simp only [eventually_map], exact eventually_congr (h.mono $ λ x hx, hx ▸ iff.rfl) }
end map
section comap
/-- The inverse map of a filter -/
def comap (m : α → β) (f : filter β) : filter α :=
{ sets := { s | ∃ t ∈ f, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s },
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem, by simp only [subset_univ, preimage_univ]⟩,
sets_of_superset := λ a b ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab, ⟨a', ha', ma'a.trans ab⟩,
inter_sets := λ a b ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩,
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem ha₁ hb₁, inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂⟩ }
lemma eventually_comap' {f : filter β} {φ : α → β} {p : β → Prop} (hf : ∀ᶠ b in f, p b) :
∀ᶠ a in comap φ f, p (φ a) :=
⟨_, hf, (λ a h, h)⟩
@[simp] lemma eventually_comap {f : filter β} {φ : α → β} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ a in comap φ f, P a) ↔ ∀ᶠ b in f, ∀ a, φ a = b → P a :=
begin
split ; intro h,
{ rcases h with ⟨t, t_in, ht⟩,
apply mem_of_superset t_in,
rintro y y_in _ rfl,
apply ht y_in },
{ exact ⟨_, h, λ _ x_in, x_in _ rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma frequently_comap {f : filter β} {φ : α → β} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ a in comap φ f, P a) ↔ ∃ᶠ b in f, ∃ a, φ a = b ∧ P a :=
by simp only [filter.frequently, eventually_comap, not_exists, not_and]
end comap
/-- The monadic bind operation on filter is defined the usual way in terms of `map` and `join`.
Unfortunately, this `bind` does not result in the expected applicative. See `filter.seq` for the
applicative instance. -/
def bind (f : filter α) (m : α → filter β) : filter β := join (map m f)
/-- The applicative sequentiation operation. This is not induced by the bind operation. -/
def seq (f : filter (α → β)) (g : filter α) : filter β :=
⟨{ s | ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, (∀ m ∈ u, ∀ x ∈ t, (m : α → β) x ∈ s) },
⟨univ, univ_mem, univ, univ_mem,
by simp only [forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, forall_true_iff]⟩,
λ s₀ s₁ ⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, h⟩ hst, ⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, λ x hx y hy, hst $ h _ hx _ hy⟩,
λ s₀ s₁ ⟨t₀, ht₀, t₁, ht₁, ht⟩ ⟨u₀, hu₀, u₁, hu₁, hu⟩,
⟨t₀ ∩ u₀, inter_mem ht₀ hu₀, t₁ ∩ u₁, inter_mem ht₁ hu₁,
λ x ⟨hx₀, hx₁⟩ x ⟨hy₀, hy₁⟩, ⟨ht _ hx₀ _ hy₀, hu _ hx₁ _ hy₁⟩⟩⟩
/-- `pure x` is the set of sets that contain `x`. It is equal to `𝓟 {x}` but
with this definition we have `s ∈ pure a` defeq `a ∈ s`. -/
instance : has_pure filter :=
⟨λ (α : Type u) x,
{ sets := {s | x ∈ s},
inter_sets := λ s t, and.intro,
sets_of_superset := λ s t hs hst, hst hs,
univ_sets := trivial }⟩
instance : has_bind filter := ⟨@filter.bind⟩
instance : has_seq filter := ⟨@filter.seq⟩
instance : functor filter := { map := @filter.map }
lemma pure_sets (a : α) : (pure a : filter α).sets = {s | a ∈ s} := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_pure {a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ (pure a : filter α) ↔ a ∈ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma eventually_pure {a : α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in pure a, p x) ↔ p a :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma principal_singleton (a : α) : 𝓟 {a} = pure a :=
filter.ext $ λ s, by simp only [mem_pure, mem_principal, singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma map_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma join_pure (f : filter α) : join (pure f) = f := filter.ext $ λ s, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma pure_bind (a : α) (m : α → filter β) :
bind (pure a) m = m a :=
by simp only [has_bind.bind, bind, map_pure, join_pure]
section
-- this section needs to be before applicative, otherwise the wrong instance will be chosen
/-- The monad structure on filters. -/
protected def monad : monad filter := { map := @filter.map }
local attribute [instance] filter.monad
protected lemma is_lawful_monad : is_lawful_monad filter :=
{ id_map := λ α f, filter_eq rfl,
pure_bind := λ α β, pure_bind,
bind_assoc := λ α β γ f m₁ m₂, filter_eq rfl,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := λ α β f x, filter.ext $ λ s,
by simp only [has_bind.bind, bind, functor.map, mem_map', mem_join, mem_set_of_eq,
comp, mem_pure] }
end
instance : applicative filter := { map := @filter.map, seq := @filter.seq }
instance : alternative filter :=
{ failure := λ α, ⊥,
orelse := λ α x y, x ⊔ y }
@[simp] lemma map_def {α β} (m : α → β) (f : filter α) : m <$> f = map m f := rfl
@[simp] lemma bind_def {α β} (f : filter α) (m : α → filter β) : f >>= m = bind f m := rfl
/-! #### `map` and `comap` equations -/
section map
variables {f f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g g₁ g₂ : filter β} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : set α} {t : set β}
@[simp] theorem mem_comap : s ∈ comap m g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := iff.rfl
theorem preimage_mem_comap (ht : t ∈ g) : m ⁻¹' t ∈ comap m g :=
⟨t, ht, subset.rfl⟩
lemma comap_id : comap id f = f :=
le_antisymm (λ s, preimage_mem_comap) (λ s ⟨t, ht, hst⟩, mem_of_superset ht hst)
lemma comap_const_of_not_mem {x : α} {f : filter α} {V : set α} (hV : V ∈ f) (hx : x ∉ V) :
comap (λ y : α, x) f = ⊥ :=
begin
ext W,
suffices : ∃ t ∈ f, (λ (y : α), x) ⁻¹' t ⊆ W, by simpa,
use [V, hV],
simp [preimage_const_of_not_mem hx],
end
lemma comap_const_of_mem {x : α} {f : filter α} (h : ∀ V ∈ f, x ∈ V) : comap (λ y : α, x) f = ⊤ :=
begin
ext W,
suffices : (∃ (t : set α), t ∈ f ∧ (λ (y : α), x) ⁻¹' t ⊆ W) ↔ W = univ,
by simpa,
split,
{ rintro ⟨V, V_in, hW⟩,
simpa [preimage_const_of_mem (h V V_in), univ_subset_iff] using hW },
{ rintro rfl,
use univ,
simp [univ_mem] },
end
lemma comap_comap {m : γ → β} {n : β → α} : comap m (comap n f) = comap (n ∘ m) f :=
le_antisymm
(λ c ⟨b, hb, (h : preimage (n ∘ m) b ⊆ c)⟩, ⟨preimage n b, preimage_mem_comap hb, h⟩)
(λ c ⟨b, ⟨a, ha, (h₁ : preimage n a ⊆ b)⟩, (h₂ : preimage m b ⊆ c)⟩,
⟨a, ha, show preimage m (preimage n a) ⊆ c, from (preimage_mono h₁).trans h₂⟩)
section comm
variables {δ : Type*}
/-!
The variables in the following lemmas are used as in this diagram:
```
φ
α → β
θ ↓ ↓ ψ
γ → δ
ρ
```
-/
variables {φ : α → β} {θ : α → γ} {ψ : β → δ} {ρ : γ → δ} (H : ψ ∘ φ = ρ ∘ θ)
include H
lemma map_comm (F : filter α) : map ψ (map φ F) = map ρ (map θ F) :=
by rw [filter.map_map, H, ← filter.map_map]
lemma comap_comm (G : filter δ) : comap φ (comap ψ G) = comap θ (comap ρ G) :=
by rw [filter.comap_comap, H, ← filter.comap_comap]
end comm
@[simp] theorem comap_principal {t : set β} : comap m (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' t) :=
filter.ext $ λ s,
⟨λ ⟨u, (hu : t ⊆ u), (b : preimage m u ⊆ s)⟩, (preimage_mono hu).trans b,
λ h, ⟨t, subset.refl t, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem comap_pure {b : β} : comap m (pure b) = 𝓟 (m ⁻¹' {b}) :=
by rw [← principal_singleton, comap_principal]
lemma map_le_iff_le_comap : map m f ≤ g ↔ f ≤ comap m g :=
⟨λ h s ⟨t, ht, hts⟩, mem_of_superset (h ht) hts, λ h s ht, h ⟨_, ht, subset.rfl⟩⟩
lemma gc_map_comap (m : α → β) : galois_connection (map m) (comap m) :=
λ f g, map_le_iff_le_comap
@[mono] lemma map_mono : monotone (map m) := (gc_map_comap m).monotone_l
@[mono] lemma comap_mono : monotone (comap m) := (gc_map_comap m).monotone_u
@[simp] lemma map_bot : map m ⊥ = ⊥ := (gc_map_comap m).l_bot
@[simp] lemma map_sup : map m (f₁ ⊔ f₂) = map m f₁ ⊔ map m f₂ := (gc_map_comap m).l_sup
@[simp] lemma map_supr {f : ι → filter α} : map m (⨆ i, f i) = (⨆ i, map m (f i)) :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_supr
@[simp] lemma comap_top : comap m ⊤ = ⊤ := (gc_map_comap m).u_top
@[simp] lemma comap_inf : comap m (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊓ comap m g₂ := (gc_map_comap m).u_inf
@[simp] lemma comap_infi {f : ι → filter β} : comap m (⨅ i, f i) = (⨅ i, comap m (f i)) :=
(gc_map_comap m).u_infi
lemma le_comap_top (f : α → β) (l : filter α) : l ≤ comap f ⊤ :=
by { rw [comap_top], exact le_top }
lemma map_comap_le : map m (comap m g) ≤ g := (gc_map_comap m).l_u_le _
lemma le_comap_map : f ≤ comap m (map m f) := (gc_map_comap m).le_u_l _
@[simp] lemma comap_bot : comap m ⊥ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ λ s _, ⟨∅, by simp only [mem_bot], by simp only [empty_subset, preimage_empty]⟩
lemma comap_supr {ι} {f : ι → filter β} {m : α → β} :
comap m (supr f) = (⨆ i, comap m (f i)) :=
le_antisymm
(λ s hs,
have ∀ i, ∃ t, t ∈ f i ∧ m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s,
by simpa only [mem_comap, exists_prop, mem_supr] using mem_supr.1 hs,
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice this in
⟨⋃ i, t i, mem_supr.2 $ λ i, (f i).sets_of_superset (ht i).1 (subset_Union _ _),
begin
rw [preimage_Union, Union_subset_iff],
exact λ i, (ht i).2
end⟩)
(supr_le $ λ i, comap_mono $ le_supr _ _)
lemma comap_Sup {s : set (filter β)} {m : α → β} : comap m (Sup s) = (⨆ f ∈ s, comap m f) :=
by simp only [Sup_eq_supr, comap_supr, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma comap_sup : comap m (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊔ comap m g₂ :=
by rw [sup_eq_supr, comap_supr, supr_bool_eq, bool.cond_tt, bool.cond_ff]
lemma map_comap (f : filter β) (m : α → β) : (f.comap m).map m = f ⊓ 𝓟 (range m) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_inf map_comap_le $ le_principal_iff.2 range_mem_map) _,
rintro t' ⟨t, ht, sub⟩,
refine mem_inf_principal.2 (mem_of_superset ht _),
rintro _ hxt ⟨x, rfl⟩,
exact sub hxt
end
lemma map_comap_of_mem {f : filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) : (f.comap m).map m = f :=
by rw [map_comap, inf_eq_left.2 (le_principal_iff.2 hf)]
lemma comap_le_comap_iff {f g : filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f) :
comap m f ≤ comap m g ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨λ h, map_comap_of_mem hf ▸ (map_mono h).trans map_comap_le, λ h, comap_mono h⟩
theorem map_comap_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) (l : filter β) :
map f (comap f l) = l :=
map_comap_of_mem $ by simp only [hf.range_eq, univ_mem]
lemma _root_.function.surjective.filter_map_top {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(congr_arg _ comap_top).symm.trans $ map_comap_of_surjective hf ⊤
lemma subtype_coe_map_comap (s : set α) (f : filter α) :
map (coe : s → α) (comap (coe : s → α) f) = f ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
by rw [map_comap, subtype.range_coe]
lemma subtype_coe_map_comap_prod (s : set α) (f : filter (α × α)) :
map (coe : s × s → α × α) (comap (coe : s × s → α × α) f) = f ⊓ 𝓟 (s.prod s) :=
have (coe : s × s → α × α) = (λ x, (x.1, x.2)), by ext ⟨x, y⟩; refl,
by simp [this, map_comap, ← prod_range_range_eq]
lemma image_mem_of_mem_comap {f : filter α} {c : β → α} (h : range c ∈ f) {W : set β}
(W_in : W ∈ comap c f) : c '' W ∈ f :=
begin
rw ← map_comap_of_mem h,
exact image_mem_map W_in
end
lemma image_coe_mem_of_mem_comap {f : filter α} {U : set α} (h : U ∈ f) {W : set U}
(W_in : W ∈ comap (coe : U → α) f) : coe '' W ∈ f :=
image_mem_of_mem_comap (by simp [h]) W_in
lemma comap_map {f : filter α} {m : α → β} (h : injective m) :
comap m (map m f) = f :=
le_antisymm
(λ s hs, mem_of_superset (preimage_mem_comap $ image_mem_map hs) $
by simp only [preimage_image_eq s h])
le_comap_map
lemma mem_comap_iff {f : filter β} {m : α → β} (inj : injective m)
(large : set.range m ∈ f) {S : set α} : S ∈ comap m f ↔ m '' S ∈ f :=
by rw [← image_mem_map_iff inj, map_comap_of_mem large]
lemma le_of_map_le_map_inj' {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} {s : set α}
(hsf : s ∈ f) (hsg : s ∈ g) (hm : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, m x = m y → x = y)
(h : map m f ≤ map m g) : f ≤ g :=
λ t ht, by filter_upwards [hsf, h $ image_mem_map (inter_mem hsg ht)]
λ a has ⟨b, ⟨hbs, hb⟩, h⟩,
hm _ hbs _ has h ▸ hb
lemma le_of_map_le_map_inj_iff {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} {s : set α}
(hsf : s ∈ f) (hsg : s ∈ g) (hm : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, m x = m y → x = y) :
map m f ≤ map m g ↔ f ≤ g :=
iff.intro (le_of_map_le_map_inj' hsf hsg hm) (λ h, map_mono h)
lemma eq_of_map_eq_map_inj' {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} {s : set α}
(hsf : s ∈ f) (hsg : s ∈ g) (hm : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, m x = m y → x = y)
(h : map m f = map m g) : f = g :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_map_le_map_inj' hsf hsg hm $ le_of_eq h)
(le_of_map_le_map_inj' hsg hsf hm $ le_of_eq h.symm)
lemma map_inj {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : injective m) (h : map m f = map m g) :
f = g :=
have comap m (map m f) = comap m (map m g), by rw h,
by rwa [comap_map hm, comap_map hm] at this
lemma comap_ne_bot_iff {f : filter β} {m : α → β} : ne_bot (comap m f) ↔ ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t :=
begin
rw ← forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot,
exact ⟨λ h t t_in, h (m ⁻¹' t) ⟨t, t_in, subset.rfl⟩,
λ h s ⟨u, u_in, hu⟩, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h u u_in in ⟨x, hu hx⟩⟩,
end
lemma comap_ne_bot {f : filter β} {m : α → β} (hm : ∀ t ∈ f, ∃ a, m a ∈ t) : ne_bot (comap m f) :=
comap_ne_bot_iff.mpr hm
lemma comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently {f : filter β} {m : α → β} :
ne_bot (comap m f) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in f, y ∈ range m :=
by simp [comap_ne_bot_iff, frequently_iff, ← exists_and_distrib_left, and.comm]
lemma comap_ne_bot_iff_compl_range {f : filter β} {m : α → β} :
ne_bot (comap m f) ↔ (range m)ᶜ ∉ f :=
comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently
lemma ne_bot.comap_of_range_mem {f : filter β} {m : α → β}
(hf : ne_bot f) (hm : range m ∈ f) : ne_bot (comap m f) :=
comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently.2 $ eventually.frequently hm
@[simp] lemma comap_fst_ne_bot_iff {f : filter α} :
(f.comap (prod.fst : α × β → α)).ne_bot ↔ f.ne_bot ∧ nonempty β :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty β,
{ rw [filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; [simp *, apply_instance] },
{ simp [comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently, h] }
end
@[instance] lemma comap_fst_ne_bot [nonempty β] {f : filter α} [ne_bot f] :
(f.comap (prod.fst : α × β → α)).ne_bot :=
comap_fst_ne_bot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_snd_ne_bot_iff {f : filter β} :
(f.comap (prod.snd : α × β → β)).ne_bot ↔ nonempty α ∧ f.ne_bot :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty α with hα hα,
{ rw [filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not];
[simpa using hα.elim, apply_instance] },
{ simp [comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently, hα] }
end
@[instance] lemma comap_snd_ne_bot [nonempty α] {f : filter β} [ne_bot f] :
(f.comap (prod.snd : α × β → β)).ne_bot :=
comap_snd_ne_bot_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
lemma comap_eval_ne_bot_iff' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {i : ι} {f : filter (α i)} :
(comap (eval i) f).ne_bot ↔ (∀ j, nonempty (α j)) ∧ ne_bot f :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty (Π j, α j) with H H,
{ rw [filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty (f.comap _), ← not_iff_not]; [skip, assumption],
simpa [← classical.nonempty_pi] using H.elim },
{ haveI : ∀ j, nonempty (α j), from classical.nonempty_pi.1 H,
simp [comap_ne_bot_iff_frequently, *] }
end
@[simp] lemma comap_eval_ne_bot_iff {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, nonempty (α j)]
{i : ι} {f : filter (α i)} :
(comap (eval i) f).ne_bot ↔ ne_bot f :=
by simp [comap_eval_ne_bot_iff', *]
@[instance] lemma comap_eval_ne_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ j, nonempty (α j)]
(i : ι) (f : filter (α i)) [ne_bot f] :
(comap (eval i) f).ne_bot :=
comap_eval_ne_bot_iff.2 ‹_›
lemma comap_inf_principal_ne_bot_of_image_mem {f : filter β} {m : α → β}
(hf : ne_bot f) {s : set α} (hs : m '' s ∈ f) :
ne_bot (comap m f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
begin
refine ⟨compl_compl s ▸ mt mem_of_eq_bot _⟩,
rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
rcases hf.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hs ht) with ⟨_, ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩, hxt⟩,
exact absurd hxs (hts hxt)
end
lemma comap_coe_ne_bot_of_le_principal {s : set γ} {l : filter γ} [h : ne_bot l] (h' : l ≤ 𝓟 s) :
ne_bot (comap (coe : s → γ) l) :=
h.comap_of_range_mem $ (@subtype.range_coe γ s).symm ▸ h' (mem_principal_self s)
lemma ne_bot.comap_of_surj {f : filter β} {m : α → β}
(hf : ne_bot f) (hm : surjective m) :
ne_bot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem $ univ_mem' hm
lemma ne_bot.comap_of_image_mem {f : filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : ne_bot f)
{s : set α} (hs : m '' s ∈ f) :
ne_bot (comap m f) :=
hf.comap_of_range_mem $ mem_of_superset hs (image_subset_range _ _)
@[simp] lemma map_eq_bot_iff : map m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨by { rw [←empty_mem_iff_bot, ←empty_mem_iff_bot], exact id },
λ h, by simp only [h, eq_self_iff_true, map_bot]⟩
lemma map_ne_bot_iff (f : α → β) {F : filter α} : ne_bot (map f F) ↔ ne_bot F :=
by simp only [ne_bot_iff, ne, map_eq_bot_iff]
lemma ne_bot.map (hf : ne_bot f) (m : α → β) : ne_bot (map m f) :=
(map_ne_bot_iff m).2 hf
instance map_ne_bot [hf : ne_bot f] : ne_bot (f.map m) := hf.map m
lemma sInter_comap_sets (f : α → β) (F : filter β) :
⋂₀ (comap f F).sets = ⋂ U ∈ F, f ⁻¹' U :=
begin
ext x,
suffices : (∀ (A : set α) (B : set β), B ∈ F → f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A → x ∈ A) ↔
∀ (B : set β), B ∈ F → f x ∈ B,
by simp only [mem_sInter, mem_Inter, filter.mem_sets, mem_comap, this, and_imp,
exists_prop, mem_preimage, exists_imp_distrib],
split,
{ intros h U U_in,
simpa only [subset.refl, forall_prop_of_true, mem_preimage] using h (f ⁻¹' U) U U_in },
{ intros h V U U_in f_U_V,
exact f_U_V (h U U_in) },
end
end map
-- this is a generic rule for monotone functions:
lemma map_infi_le {f : ι → filter α} {m : α → β} :
map m (infi f) ≤ (⨅ i, map m (f i)) :=
le_infi $ λ i, map_mono $ infi_le _ _
lemma map_infi_eq {f : ι → filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : directed (≥) f) [nonempty ι] :
map m (infi f) = (⨅ i, map m (f i)) :=
map_infi_le.antisymm
(λ s (hs : preimage m s ∈ infi f),
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := (mem_infi_of_directed hf _).1 hs in
have (⨅ i, map m (f i)) ≤ 𝓟 s, from
infi_le_of_le i $ by { simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_map], assumption },
filter.le_principal_iff.1 this)
lemma map_binfi_eq {ι : Type w} {f : ι → filter α} {m : α → β} {p : ι → Prop}
(h : directed_on (f ⁻¹'o (≥)) {x | p x}) (ne : ∃ i, p i) :
map m (⨅ i (h : p i), f i) = (⨅ i (h : p i), map m (f i)) :=
begin
haveI := nonempty_subtype.2 ne,
simp only [infi_subtype'],
exact map_infi_eq h.directed_coe
end
lemma map_inf_le {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} : map m (f ⊓ g) ≤ map m f ⊓ map m g :=
(@map_mono _ _ m).map_inf_le f g
lemma map_inf' {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} {t : set α} (htf : t ∈ f) (htg : t ∈ g)
(h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, m x = m y → x = y) : map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm map_inf_le (λ s hs, _),
simp only [mem_inf_iff, exists_prop, mem_map, mem_preimage, mem_inf_iff] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, hs : m ⁻¹' s = t₁ ∩ t₂⟩,
have : m '' (t₁ ∩ t) ∩ m '' (t₂ ∩ t) ∈ map m f ⊓ map m g,
{ apply inter_mem_inf ; apply image_mem_map,
exacts [inter_mem h₁ htf, inter_mem h₂ htg] },
apply mem_of_superset this,
{ rw [image_inter_on],
{ refine image_subset_iff.2 _,
rw hs,
exact λ x ⟨⟨h₁, _⟩, h₂, _⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ exact λ x ⟨_, hx⟩ y ⟨_, hy⟩, h x hx y hy } }
end
lemma map_inf {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} (h : injective m) :
map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g :=
map_inf' univ_mem univ_mem (λ x _ y _ hxy, h hxy)
lemma map_eq_comap_of_inverse {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {n : β → α}
(h₁ : m ∘ n = id) (h₂ : n ∘ m = id) : map m f = comap n f :=
le_antisymm
(λ b ⟨a, ha, (h : preimage n a ⊆ b)⟩, f.sets_of_superset ha $
calc a = preimage (n ∘ m) a : by simp only [h₂, preimage_id, eq_self_iff_true]
... ⊆ preimage m b : preimage_mono h)
(λ b (hb : preimage m b ∈ f),
⟨preimage m b, hb, show preimage (m ∘ n) b ⊆ b, by simp only [h₁]; apply subset.refl⟩)
lemma map_swap_eq_comap_swap {f : filter (α × β)} : prod.swap <$> f = comap prod.swap f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse prod.swap_swap_eq prod.swap_swap_eq
lemma le_map {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {g : filter β} (h : ∀ s ∈ f, m '' s ∈ g) :
g ≤ f.map m :=
λ s hs, mem_of_superset (h _ hs) $ image_preimage_subset _ _
protected lemma push_pull (f : α → β) (F : filter α) (G : filter β) :
map f (F ⊓ comap f G) = map f F ⊓ G :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ calc map f (F ⊓ comap f G) ≤ map f F ⊓ (map f $ comap f G) : map_inf_le
... ≤ map f F ⊓ G : inf_le_inf_left (map f F) map_comap_le },
{ rintro U ⟨V, V_in, W, ⟨Z, Z_in, hZ⟩, h⟩,
apply mem_inf_of_inter (image_mem_map V_in) Z_in,
calc
f '' V ∩ Z = f '' (V ∩ f ⁻¹' Z) : by rw image_inter_preimage
... ⊆ f '' (V ∩ W) : image_subset _ (inter_subset_inter_right _ ‹_›)
... = f '' (f ⁻¹' U) : by rw h
... ⊆ U : image_preimage_subset f U }
end
protected lemma push_pull' (f : α → β) (F : filter α) (G : filter β) :
map f (comap f G ⊓ F) = G ⊓ map f F :=
by simp only [filter.push_pull, inf_comm]
section applicative
lemma singleton_mem_pure {a : α} : {a} ∈ (pure a : filter α) :=
mem_singleton a
lemma pure_injective : injective (pure : α → filter α) :=
λ a b hab, (filter.ext_iff.1 hab {x | a = x}).1 rfl
instance pure_ne_bot {α : Type u} {a : α} : ne_bot (pure a) :=
⟨mt empty_mem_iff_bot.2 $ not_mem_empty a⟩
@[simp] lemma le_pure_iff {f : filter α} {a : α} : f ≤ pure a ↔ {a} ∈ f :=
⟨λ h, h singleton_mem_pure,
λ h s hs, mem_of_superset h $ singleton_subset_iff.2 hs⟩
lemma mem_seq_def {f : filter (α → β)} {g : filter α} {s : set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ (∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, (x : α → β) y ∈ s) :=
iff.rfl
lemma mem_seq_iff {f : filter (α → β)} {g : filter α} {s : set β} :
s ∈ f.seq g ↔ (∃ u ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, set.seq u t ⊆ s) :=
by simp only [mem_seq_def, seq_subset, exists_prop, iff_self]
lemma mem_map_seq_iff {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {m : α → β → γ} {s : set γ} :
s ∈ (f.map m).seq g ↔ (∃ t u, t ∈ g ∧ u ∈ f ∧ ∀ x ∈ u, ∀ y ∈ t, m x y ∈ s) :=
iff.intro
(λ ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hts⟩, ⟨s, m ⁻¹' t, hs, ht, λ a, hts _⟩)
(λ ⟨t, s, ht, hs, hts⟩, ⟨m '' s, image_mem_map hs, t, ht, λ f ⟨a, has, eq⟩, eq ▸ hts _ has⟩)
lemma seq_mem_seq {f : filter (α → β)} {g : filter α} {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α}
(hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s.seq t ∈ f.seq g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, λ f hf a ha, ⟨f, hf, a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
lemma le_seq {f : filter (α → β)} {g : filter α} {h : filter β}
(hh : ∀ t ∈ f, ∀ u ∈ g, set.seq t u ∈ h) : h ≤ seq f g :=
λ s ⟨t, ht, u, hu, hs⟩, mem_of_superset (hh _ ht _ hu) $
λ b ⟨m, hm, a, ha, eq⟩, eq ▸ hs _ hm _ ha
@[mono] lemma seq_mono {f₁ f₂ : filter (α → β)} {g₁ g₂ : filter α}
(hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f₁.seq g₁ ≤ f₂.seq g₂ :=
le_seq $ λ s hs t ht, seq_mem_seq (hf hs) (hg ht)
@[simp] lemma pure_seq_eq_map (g : α → β) (f : filter α) : seq (pure g) f = f.map g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_map $ λ s hs, _) (le_seq $ λ s hs t ht, _),
{ rw ← singleton_seq, apply seq_mem_seq _ hs,
exact singleton_mem_pure },
{ refine sets_of_superset (map g f) (image_mem_map ht) _,
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩, exact ⟨g, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma seq_pure (f : filter (α → β)) (a : α) : seq f (pure a) = map (λ g : α → β, g a) f :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_map $ λ s hs, _) (le_seq $ λ s hs t ht, _),
{ rw ← seq_singleton,
exact seq_mem_seq hs singleton_mem_pure },
{ refine sets_of_superset (map (λg:α→β, g a) f) (image_mem_map hs) _,
rintro b ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩, exact ⟨g, hg, a, ht, rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma seq_assoc (x : filter α) (g : filter (α → β)) (h : filter (β → γ)) :
seq h (seq g x) = seq (seq (map (∘) h) g) x :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_seq $ λ s hs t ht, _) (le_seq $ λ s hs t ht, _),
{ rcases mem_seq_iff.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, hs⟩,
rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hu with ⟨w, hw, hu⟩,
refine mem_of_superset _
(set.seq_mono ((set.seq_mono hu subset.rfl).trans hs) subset.rfl),
rw ← set.seq_seq,
exact seq_mem_seq hw (seq_mem_seq hv ht) },
{ rcases mem_seq_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, ht⟩,
refine mem_of_superset _ (set.seq_mono subset.rfl ht),
rw set.seq_seq,
exact seq_mem_seq (seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map hs) hu) hv }
end
lemma prod_map_seq_comm (f : filter α) (g : filter β) :
(map prod.mk f).seq g = seq (map (λ b a, (a, b)) g) f :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_seq $ λ s hs t ht, _) (le_seq $ λ s hs t ht, _),
{ rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩,
refine mem_of_superset _ (set.seq_mono hs subset.rfl),
rw ← set.prod_image_seq_comm,
exact seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map ht) hu },
{ rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩,
refine mem_of_superset _ (set.seq_mono hs subset.rfl),
rw set.prod_image_seq_comm,
exact seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map ht) hu }
end
instance : is_lawful_functor (filter : Type u → Type u) :=
{ id_map := λ α f, map_id,
comp_map := λ α β γ f g a, map_map.symm }
instance : is_lawful_applicative (filter : Type u → Type u) :=
{ pure_seq_eq_map := λ α β, pure_seq_eq_map,
map_pure := λ α β, map_pure,
seq_pure := λ α β, seq_pure,
seq_assoc := λ α β γ, seq_assoc }
instance : is_comm_applicative (filter : Type u → Type u) :=
⟨λ α β f g, prod_map_seq_comm f g⟩
lemma {l} seq_eq_filter_seq {α β : Type l} (f : filter (α → β)) (g : filter α) :
f <*> g = seq f g := rfl
end applicative
/-! #### `bind` equations -/
section bind
@[simp] lemma eventually_bind {f : filter α} {m : α → filter β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in bind f m, p y) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ᶠ y in m x, p y :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma eventually_eq_bind {f : filter α} {m : α → filter β} {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
(g₁ =ᶠ[bind f m] g₂) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, g₁ =ᶠ[m x] g₂ :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma eventually_le_bind [has_le γ] {f : filter α} {m : α → filter β} {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
(g₁ ≤ᶠ[bind f m] g₂) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, g₁ ≤ᶠ[m x] g₂ :=
iff.rfl
lemma mem_bind' {s : set β} {f : filter α} {m : α → filter β} :
s ∈ bind f m ↔ {a | s ∈ m a} ∈ f :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_bind {s : set β} {f : filter α} {m : α → filter β} :
s ∈ bind f m ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, s ∈ m x :=
calc s ∈ bind f m ↔ {a | s ∈ m a} ∈ f : iff.rfl
... ↔ (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ {a | s ∈ m a}) : exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
... ↔ (∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, s ∈ m x) : iff.rfl
lemma bind_le {f : filter α} {g : α → filter β} {l : filter β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, g x ≤ l) :
f.bind g ≤ l :=
join_le $ eventually_map.2 h
@[mono] lemma bind_mono {f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g₁ g₂ : α → filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[f₁] g₂) :
bind f₁ g₁ ≤ bind f₂ g₂ :=
begin
refine le_trans (λ s hs, _) (join_mono $ map_mono hf),
simp only [mem_join, mem_bind', mem_map] at hs ⊢,
filter_upwards [hg, hs],
exact λ x hx hs, hx hs
end
lemma bind_inf_principal {f : filter α} {g : α → filter β} {s : set β} :
f.bind (λ x, g x ⊓ 𝓟 s) = (f.bind g) ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
filter.ext $ λ s, by simp only [mem_bind, mem_inf_principal]
lemma sup_bind {f g : filter α} {h : α → filter β} :
bind (f ⊔ g) h = bind f h ⊔ bind g h :=
by simp only [bind, sup_join, map_sup, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma principal_bind {s : set α} {f : α → filter β} :
(bind (𝓟 s) f) = (⨆ x ∈ s, f x) :=
show join (map f (𝓟 s)) = (⨆ x ∈ s, f x),
by simp only [Sup_image, join_principal_eq_Sup, map_principal, eq_self_iff_true]
end bind
section list_traverse
/- This is a separate section in order to open `list`, but mostly because of universe
equality requirements in `traverse` -/
open list
lemma sequence_mono :
∀ (as bs : list (filter α)), forall₂ (≤) as bs → sequence as ≤ sequence bs
| [] [] forall₂.nil := le_rfl
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) (forall₂.cons h hs) := seq_mono (map_mono h) (sequence_mono as bs hs)
variables {α' β' γ' : Type u} {f : β' → filter α'} {s : γ' → set α'}
lemma mem_traverse :
∀ (fs : list β') (us : list γ'),
forall₂ (λ b c, s c ∈ f b) fs us → traverse s us ∈ traverse f fs
| [] [] forall₂.nil := mem_pure.2 $ mem_singleton _
| (f :: fs) (u :: us) (forall₂.cons h hs) := seq_mem_seq (image_mem_map h) (mem_traverse fs us hs)
lemma mem_traverse_iff (fs : list β') (t : set (list α')) :
t ∈ traverse f fs ↔
(∃ us : list (set α'), forall₂ (λ b (s : set α'), s ∈ f b) fs us ∧ sequence us ⊆ t) :=
begin
split,
{ induction fs generalizing t,
case nil { simp only [sequence, mem_pure, imp_self, forall₂_nil_left_iff,
exists_eq_left, set.pure_def, singleton_subset_iff, traverse_nil] },
case cons : b fs ih t {
intro ht,
rcases mem_seq_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, ht⟩,
rcases mem_map_iff_exists_image.1 hu with ⟨w, hw, hwu⟩,
rcases ih v hv with ⟨us, hus, hu⟩,
exact ⟨w :: us, forall₂.cons hw hus, (set.seq_mono hwu hu).trans ht⟩ } },
{ rintro ⟨us, hus, hs⟩,
exact mem_of_superset (mem_traverse _ _ hus) hs }
end
end list_traverse
/-! ### Limits -/
/-- `tendsto` is the generic "limit of a function" predicate.
`tendsto f l₁ l₂` asserts that for every `l₂` neighborhood `a`,
the `f`-preimage of `a` is an `l₁` neighborhood. -/
def tendsto (f : α → β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) := l₁.map f ≤ l₂
lemma tendsto_def {f : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂, f ⁻¹' s ∈ l₁ := iff.rfl
lemma tendsto_iff_eventually {f : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃p : β → Prop⦄, (∀ᶠ y in l₂, p y) → ∀ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x) :=
iff.rfl
lemma tendsto.eventually {f : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} {p : β → Prop}
(hf : tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : ∀ᶠ y in l₂, p y) :
∀ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x) :=
hf h
lemma tendsto.frequently {f : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} {p : β → Prop}
(hf : tendsto f l₁ l₂) (h : ∃ᶠ x in l₁, p (f x)) :
∃ᶠ y in l₂, p y :=
mt hf.eventually h
lemma tendsto.frequently_map {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(f : α → β) (c : filter.tendsto f l₁ l₂) (w : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) (h : ∃ᶠ x in l₁, p x) :
∃ᶠ y in l₂, q y :=
c.frequently (h.mono w)
@[simp] lemma tendsto_bot {f : α → β} {l : filter β} : tendsto f ⊥ l := by simp [tendsto]
@[simp] lemma tendsto_top {f : α → β} {l : filter α} : tendsto f l ⊤ := le_top
lemma le_map_of_right_inverse {mab : α → β} {mba : β → α} {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
(h₁ : mab ∘ mba =ᶠ[g] id) (h₂ : tendsto mba g f) :
g ≤ map mab f :=
by { rw [← @map_id _ g, ← map_congr h₁, ← map_map], exact map_mono h₂ }
lemma tendsto_of_is_empty [is_empty α] {f : α → β} {la : filter α} {lb : filter β} :
tendsto f la lb :=
by simp only [filter_eq_bot_of_is_empty la, tendsto_bot]
lemma eventually_eq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} {fa : filter α}
{fb : filter β} (hleft : ∀ᶠ x in fa, g₁ (f x) = x) (hright : ∀ᶠ y in fb, f (g₂ y) = y)
(htendsto : tendsto g₂ fb fa) :
g₁ =ᶠ[fb] g₂ :=
(htendsto.eventually hleft).mp $ hright.mono $ λ y hr hl, (congr_arg g₁ hr.symm).trans hl
lemma tendsto_iff_comap {f : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂.comap f :=
map_le_iff_le_comap
alias tendsto_iff_comap ↔ filter.tendsto.le_comap _
lemma tendsto_congr' {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} (hl : f₁ =ᶠ[l₁] f₂) :
tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ ↔ tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
by rw [tendsto, tendsto, map_congr hl]
lemma tendsto.congr' {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β}
(hl : f₁ =ᶠ[l₁] f₂) (h : tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂) : tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_congr' hl).1 h
theorem tendsto_congr {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β}
(h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ ↔ tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
tendsto_congr' (univ_mem' h)
theorem tendsto.congr {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β}
(h : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂ → tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
(tendsto_congr h).1
lemma tendsto_id' {x y : filter α} : x ≤ y → tendsto id x y :=
by simp only [tendsto, map_id, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt}
lemma tendsto_id {x : filter α} : tendsto id x x := tendsto_id' $ le_refl x
lemma tendsto.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {x : filter α} {y : filter β} {z : filter γ}
(hg : tendsto g y z) (hf : tendsto f x y) : tendsto (g ∘ f) x z :=
calc map (g ∘ f) x = map g (map f x) : by rw [map_map]
... ≤ map g y : map_mono hf
... ≤ z : hg
lemma tendsto.mono_left {f : α → β} {x y : filter α} {z : filter β}
(hx : tendsto f x z) (h : y ≤ x) : tendsto f y z :=
(map_mono h).trans hx
lemma tendsto.mono_right {f : α → β} {x : filter α} {y z : filter β}
(hy : tendsto f x y) (hz : y ≤ z) : tendsto f x z :=
le_trans hy hz
lemma tendsto.ne_bot {f : α → β} {x : filter α} {y : filter β} (h : tendsto f x y) [hx : ne_bot x] :
ne_bot y :=
(hx.map _).mono h
lemma tendsto_map {f : α → β} {x : filter α} : tendsto f x (map f x) := le_refl (map f x)
lemma tendsto_map' {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {x : filter α} {y : filter γ}
(h : tendsto (f ∘ g) x y) : tendsto f (map g x) y :=
by rwa [tendsto, map_map]
@[simp] lemma tendsto_map'_iff {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {x : filter α} {y : filter γ} :
tendsto f (map g x) y ↔ tendsto (f ∘ g) x y :=
by { rw [tendsto, map_map], refl }
lemma tendsto_comap {f : α → β} {x : filter β} : tendsto f (comap f x) x :=
map_comap_le
@[simp] lemma tendsto_comap_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : filter α} {c : filter γ} :
tendsto f a (c.comap g) ↔ tendsto (g ∘ f) a c :=
⟨λ h, tendsto_comap.comp h, λ h, map_le_iff_le_comap.mp $ by rwa [map_map]⟩
lemma tendsto_comap'_iff {m : α → β} {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {i : γ → α}
(h : range i ∈ f) : tendsto (m ∘ i) (comap i f) g ↔ tendsto m f g :=
by { rw [tendsto, ← map_compose], simp only [(∘), map_comap_of_mem h, tendsto] }
lemma tendsto.of_tendsto_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : filter α} {b : filter β} {c : filter γ}
(hfg : tendsto (g ∘ f) a c) (hg : comap g c ≤ b) :
tendsto f a b :=
begin
rw tendsto_iff_comap at hfg ⊢,
calc a ≤ comap (g ∘ f) c : hfg
... ≤ comap f b : by simpa [comap_comap] using comap_mono hg
end
lemma comap_eq_of_inverse {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {φ : α → β} (ψ : β → α)
(eq : ψ ∘ φ = id) (hφ : tendsto φ f g) (hψ : tendsto ψ g f) : comap φ g = f :=
begin
refine ((comap_mono $ map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hψ).trans _).antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hφ),
rw [comap_comap, eq, comap_id],
exact le_rfl
end
lemma map_eq_of_inverse {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {φ : α → β} (ψ : β → α)
(eq : φ ∘ ψ = id) (hφ : tendsto φ f g) (hψ : tendsto ψ g f) : map φ f = g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm hφ (le_trans _ (map_mono hψ)),
rw [map_map, eq, map_id],
exact le_rfl
end
lemma tendsto_inf {f : α → β} {x : filter α} {y₁ y₂ : filter β} :
tendsto f x (y₁ ⊓ y₂) ↔ tendsto f x y₁ ∧ tendsto f x y₂ :=
by simp only [tendsto, le_inf_iff, iff_self]
lemma tendsto_inf_left {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : filter α} {y : filter β}
(h : tendsto f x₁ y) : tendsto f (x₁ ⊓ x₂) y :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) h
lemma tendsto_inf_right {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : filter α} {y : filter β}
(h : tendsto f x₂ y) : tendsto f (x₁ ⊓ x₂) y :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) h
lemma tendsto.inf {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : filter α} {y₁ y₂ : filter β}
(h₁ : tendsto f x₁ y₁) (h₂ : tendsto f x₂ y₂) : tendsto f (x₁ ⊓ x₂) (y₁ ⊓ y₂) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_inf_left h₁, tendsto_inf_right h₂⟩
@[simp] lemma tendsto_infi {f : α → β} {x : filter α} {y : ι → filter β} :
tendsto f x (⨅ i, y i) ↔ ∀ i, tendsto f x (y i) :=
by simp only [tendsto, iff_self, le_infi_iff]
lemma tendsto_infi' {f : α → β} {x : ι → filter α} {y : filter β} (i : ι) (hi : tendsto f (x i) y) :
tendsto f (⨅ i, x i) y :=
hi.mono_left $ infi_le _ _
@[simp] lemma tendsto_sup {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : filter α} {y : filter β} :
tendsto f (x₁ ⊔ x₂) y ↔ tendsto f x₁ y ∧ tendsto f x₂ y :=
by simp only [tendsto, map_sup, sup_le_iff]
lemma tendsto.sup {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : filter α} {y : filter β} :
tendsto f x₁ y → tendsto f x₂ y → tendsto f (x₁ ⊔ x₂) y :=
λ h₁ h₂, tendsto_sup.mpr ⟨ h₁, h₂ ⟩
@[simp] lemma tendsto_supr {f : α → β} {x : ι → filter α} {y : filter β} :
tendsto f (⨆ i, x i) y ↔ ∀ i, tendsto f (x i) y :=
by simp only [tendsto, map_supr, supr_le_iff]
@[simp] lemma tendsto_principal {f : α → β} {l : filter α} {s : set β} :
tendsto f l (𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ᶠ a in l, f a ∈ s :=
by simp only [tendsto, le_principal_iff, mem_map', filter.eventually]
@[simp] lemma tendsto_principal_principal {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
tendsto f (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t :=
by simp only [tendsto_principal, eventually_principal]
@[simp] lemma tendsto_pure {f : α → β} {a : filter α} {b : β} :
tendsto f a (pure b) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in a, f x = b :=
by simp only [tendsto, le_pure_iff, mem_map', mem_singleton_iff, filter.eventually]
lemma tendsto_pure_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) :
tendsto f (pure a) (pure (f a)) :=
tendsto_pure.2 rfl
lemma tendsto_const_pure {a : filter α} {b : β} : tendsto (λ x, b) a (pure b) :=
tendsto_pure.2 $ univ_mem' $ λ _, rfl
lemma pure_le_iff {a : α} {l : filter α} : pure a ≤ l ↔ ∀ s ∈ l, a ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
lemma tendsto_pure_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {l : filter β} :
tendsto f (pure a) l ↔ ∀ s ∈ l, f a ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma map_inf_principal_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set β} {l : filter α} :
map f (l ⊓ 𝓟 (f ⁻¹' s)) = map f l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
filter.ext $ λ t, by simp only [mem_map', mem_inf_principal, mem_set_of_eq, mem_preimage]
/-- If two filters are disjoint, then a function cannot tend to both of them along a non-trivial
filter. -/
lemma tendsto.not_tendsto {f : α → β} {a : filter α} {b₁ b₂ : filter β} (hf : tendsto f a b₁)
[ne_bot a] (hb : disjoint b₁ b₂) :
¬ tendsto f a b₂ :=
λ hf', (tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hf, hf'⟩).ne_bot.ne hb.eq_bot
lemma tendsto.if {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [∀ x, decidable (p x)]
(h₀ : tendsto f (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) l₂) (h₁ : tendsto g (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 { x | ¬ p x }) l₂) :
tendsto (λ x, if p x then f x else g x) l₁ l₂ :=
begin
simp only [tendsto_def, mem_inf_principal] at *,
intros s hs,
filter_upwards [h₀ s hs, h₁ s hs],
simp only [mem_preimage], intros x hp₀ hp₁,
split_ifs,
exacts [hp₀ h, hp₁ h]
end
lemma tendsto.piecewise {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} {f g : α → β}
{s : set α} [∀ x, decidable (x ∈ s)]
(h₀ : tendsto f (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 s) l₂) (h₁ : tendsto g (l₁ ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ) l₂) :
tendsto (piecewise s f g) l₁ l₂ :=
h₀.if h₁
/-! ### Products of filters -/
section prod
variables {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
/- The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
hence:
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
hence:
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
Now ⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i} is in G but not in F.
As product filter we want to have F as result.
-/
/-- Product of filters. This is the filter generated by cartesian products
of elements of the component filters. -/
protected def prod (f : filter α) (g : filter β) : filter (α × β) :=
f.comap prod.fst ⊓ g.comap prod.snd
localized "infix ` ×ᶠ `:60 := filter.prod" in filter
lemma prod_mem_prod {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
(hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : set.prod s t ∈ f ×ᶠ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
lemma mem_prod_iff {s : set (α×β)} {f : filter α} {g : filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ᶠ g ↔ (∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, set.prod t₁ t₂ ⊆ s) :=
begin
simp only [filter.prod],
split,
{ rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, λ p ⟨h, h'⟩, ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩,
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h }
end
@[simp] lemma prod_mem_prod_iff {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
[f.ne_bot] [g.ne_bot] :
s.prod t ∈ f ×ᶠ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨s', hs', t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h in (prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(λ ⟨hs's, ht't⟩, ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩)
(λ h, h.elim
(λ hs'e, absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty)
(λ ht'e, absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty)),
λ h, prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
lemma comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : filter β) (c : filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ᶠ c) = (comap (prod.fst ∘ f) b) ⊓ (comap (prod.snd ∘ f) c) :=
by erw [comap_inf, filter.comap_comap, filter.comap_comap]
lemma prod_top {f : filter α} : f ×ᶠ (⊤ : filter β) = f.comap prod.fst :=
by rw [filter.prod, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
lemma sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : filter α) (g : filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ᶠ g = (f₁ ×ᶠ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ᶠ g) :=
by rw [filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_right, ← filter.prod, ← filter.prod]
lemma prod_sup (f : filter α) (g₁ g₂ : filter β) : f ×ᶠ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ᶠ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ᶠ g₂) :=
by rw [filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_left, ← filter.prod, ← filter.prod]
lemma eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {f : filter α} {g : filter β} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ᶠ g, p x) ↔ ∃ (pa : α → Prop) (ha : ∀ᶠ x in f, pa x)
(pb : β → Prop) (hb : ∀ᶠ y in g, pb y), ∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) :=
by simpa only [set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
lemma tendsto_fst {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : tendsto prod.fst (f ×ᶠ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
lemma tendsto_snd {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : tendsto prod.snd (f ×ᶠ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
lemma tendsto.prod_mk {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {h : filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : tendsto m₂ f h) : tendsto (λ x, (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ᶠ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
lemma eventually.prod_inl {la : filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ᶠ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
lemma eventually.prod_inr {lb : filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ᶠ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
lemma eventually.prod_mk {la : filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x)
{lb : filter β} {pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) :
∀ᶠ p in la ×ᶠ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
lemma eventually.curry {la : filter α} {lb : filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ᶠ lb, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) :=
begin
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩,
exact ha.mono (λ a ha, hb.mono $ λ b hb, h ha hb)
end
lemma prod_infi_left [nonempty ι] {f : ι → filter α} {g : filter β}:
(⨅ i, f i) ×ᶠ g = (⨅ i, (f i) ×ᶠ g) :=
by { rw [filter.prod, comap_infi, infi_inf], simp only [filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true] }
lemma prod_infi_right [nonempty ι] {f : filter α} {g : ι → filter β} :
f ×ᶠ (⨅ i, g i) = (⨅ i, f ×ᶠ (g i)) :=
by { rw [filter.prod, comap_infi, inf_infi], simp only [filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true] }
@[mono] lemma prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g₁ g₂ : filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ᶠ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ᶠ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
lemma prod_comap_comap_eq {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : filter α₁} {f₂ : filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
(comap m₁ f₁) ×ᶠ (comap m₂ f₂) = comap (λ p : β₁×β₂, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ᶠ f₂) :=
by simp only [filter.prod, comap_comap, eq_self_iff_true, comap_inf]
lemma prod_comm' : f ×ᶠ g = comap (prod.swap) (g ×ᶠ f) :=
by simp only [filter.prod, comap_comap, (∘), inf_comm, prod.fst_swap,
eq_self_iff_true, prod.snd_swap, comap_inf]
lemma prod_comm : f ×ᶠ g = map (λ p : β×α, (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ᶠ f) :=
by { rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap], refl }
lemma prod_map_map_eq {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : filter α₁} {f₂ : filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
(map m₁ f₁) ×ᶠ (map m₂ f₂) = map (λ p : α₁×α₂, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ᶠ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(λ s hs,
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs in
filter.sets_of_superset _ (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) $
calc set.prod (m₁ '' s₁) (m₂ '' s₂) = (λ p : α₁×α₂, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' set.prod s₁ s₂ :
set.prod_image_image_eq
... ⊆ _ : by rwa [image_subset_iff])
((tendsto.comp le_rfl tendsto_fst).prod_mk (tendsto.comp le_rfl tendsto_snd))
lemma prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*}
(f : α₁ → α₂) (g : β₁ → β₂) (F : filter α₁) (G : filter β₁) :
(map f F) ×ᶠ (map g G) = map (prod.map f g) (F ×ᶠ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
lemma tendsto.prod_map {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : filter α} {b : filter β}
{c : filter γ} {d : filter δ} (hf : tendsto f a c) (hg : tendsto g b d) :
tendsto (prod.map f g) (a ×ᶠ b) (c ×ᶠ d) :=
begin
erw [tendsto, ← prod_map_map_eq],
exact filter.prod_mono hf hg,
end
lemma map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : filter α) (g : filter β) :
map m (f ×ᶠ g) = (f.map (λ a b, m (a, b))).seq g :=
begin
simp [filter.ext_iff, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff],
intro s,
split,
exact λ ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩, ⟨s, hs, t, ht, λ x hx y hy, @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩,
exact λ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩, ⟨t, ht, s, hs, λ ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩, h x hx y hy⟩
end
lemma prod_eq {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : f ×ᶠ g = (f.map prod.mk).seq g :=
have h : _ := map_prod id f g, by rwa [map_id] at h
lemma prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g₁ g₂ : filter β} :
(f₁ ×ᶠ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ᶠ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ᶠ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) :=
by simp only [filter.prod, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
@[simp] lemma prod_bot {f : filter α} : f ×ᶠ (⊥ : filter β) = ⊥ := by simp [filter.prod]
@[simp] lemma bot_prod {g : filter β} : (⊥ : filter α) ×ᶠ g = ⊥ := by simp [filter.prod]
@[simp] lemma prod_principal_principal {s : set α} {t : set β} :
(𝓟 s) ×ᶠ (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (set.prod s t) :=
by simp only [filter.prod, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal];
refl
@[simp] lemma pure_prod {a : α} {f : filter β} : pure a ×ᶠ f = map (prod.mk a) f :=
by rw [prod_eq, map_pure, pure_seq_eq_map]
@[simp] lemma prod_pure {f : filter α} {b : β} : f ×ᶠ pure b = map (λ a, (a, b)) f :=
by rw [prod_eq, seq_pure, map_map]
lemma prod_pure_pure {a : α} {b : β} : (pure a) ×ᶠ (pure b) = pure (a, b) :=
by simp
lemma prod_eq_bot {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : f ×ᶠ g = ⊥ ↔ (f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (empty_mem_iff_bot.2 h) with ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩,
rw [subset_empty_iff, set.prod_eq_empty_iff] at hst,
cases hst with s_eq t_eq,
{ left, exact empty_mem_iff_bot.1 (s_eq ▸ hs) },
{ right, exact empty_mem_iff_bot.1 (t_eq ▸ ht) } },
{ rintro (rfl | rfl),
exact bot_prod,
exact prod_bot }
end
lemma prod_ne_bot {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : ne_bot (f ×ᶠ g) ↔ (ne_bot f ∧ ne_bot g) :=
by simp only [ne_bot_iff, ne, prod_eq_bot, not_or_distrib]
lemma ne_bot.prod {f : filter α} {g : filter β} (hf : ne_bot f) (hg : ne_bot g) :
ne_bot (f ×ᶠ g) :=
prod_ne_bot.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
instance prod_ne_bot' {f : filter α} {g : filter β} [hf : ne_bot f] [hg : ne_bot g] :
ne_bot (f ×ᶠ g) :=
hf.prod hg
lemma tendsto_prod_iff {f : α × β → γ} {x : filter α} {y : filter β} {z : filter γ} :
filter.tendsto f (x ×ᶠ y) z ↔
∀ W ∈ z, ∃ U ∈ x, ∃ V ∈ y, ∀ x y, x ∈ U → y ∈ V → f (x, y) ∈ W :=
by simp only [tendsto_def, mem_prod_iff, prod_sub_preimage_iff, exists_prop, iff_self]
end prod
/-! ### Coproducts of filters -/
section coprod
variables {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
/-- Coproduct of filters. -/
protected def coprod (f : filter α) (g : filter β) : filter (α × β) :=
f.comap prod.fst ⊔ g.comap prod.snd
lemma mem_coprod_iff {s : set (α×β)} {f : filter α} {g : filter β} :
s ∈ f.coprod g ↔ ((∃ t₁ ∈ f, prod.fst ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s) ∧ (∃ t₂ ∈ g, prod.snd ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s)) :=
by simp [filter.coprod]
@[mono] lemma coprod_mono {f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g₁ g₂ : filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.coprod g₁ ≤ f₂.coprod g₂ :=
sup_le_sup (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
lemma coprod_ne_bot_iff : (f.coprod g).ne_bot ↔ f.ne_bot ∧ nonempty β ∨ nonempty α ∧ g.ne_bot :=
by simp [filter.coprod]
@[instance] lemma coprod_ne_bot_left [ne_bot f] [nonempty β] : (f.coprod g).ne_bot :=
coprod_ne_bot_iff.2 (or.inl ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
@[instance] lemma coprod_ne_bot_right [ne_bot g] [nonempty α] : (f.coprod g).ne_bot :=
coprod_ne_bot_iff.2 (or.inr ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
lemma principal_coprod_principal (s : set α) (t : set β) :
(𝓟 s).coprod (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (sᶜ.prod tᶜ)ᶜ :=
begin
rw [filter.coprod, comap_principal, comap_principal, sup_principal],
congr,
ext x,
simp ; tauto,
end
-- this inequality can be strict; see `map_const_principal_coprod_map_id_principal` and
-- `map_prod_map_const_id_principal_coprod_principal` below.
lemma map_prod_map_coprod_le {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : filter α₁} {f₂ : filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map (prod.map m₁ m₂) (f₁.coprod f₂) ≤ (map m₁ f₁).coprod (map m₂ f₂) :=
begin
intros s,
simp only [mem_map, mem_coprod_iff],
rintro ⟨⟨u₁, hu₁, h₁⟩, u₂, hu₂, h₂⟩,
refine ⟨⟨m₁ ⁻¹' u₁, hu₁, λ _ hx, h₁ _⟩, ⟨m₂ ⁻¹' u₂, hu₂, λ _ hx, h₂ _⟩⟩; convert hx
end
/-- Characterization of the coproduct of the `filter.map`s of two principal filters `𝓟 {a}` and
`𝓟 {i}`, the first under the constant function `λ a, b` and the second under the identity function.
Together with the next lemma, `map_prod_map_const_id_principal_coprod_principal`, this provides an
example showing that the inequality in the lemma `map_prod_map_coprod_le` can be strict. -/
lemma map_const_principal_coprod_map_id_principal {α β ι : Type*} (a : α) (b : β) (i : ι) :
(map (λ _ : α, b) (𝓟 {a})).coprod (map id (𝓟 {i}))
= 𝓟 (({b} : set β).prod (univ : set ι) ∪ (univ : set β).prod {i}) :=
begin
rw [map_principal, map_principal, principal_coprod_principal],
congr,
ext ⟨b', i'⟩,
simp,
tauto,
end
/-- Characterization of the `filter.map` of the coproduct of two principal filters `𝓟 {a}` and
`𝓟 {i}`, under the `prod.map` of two functions, respectively the constant function `λ a, b` and the
identity function. Together with the previous lemma,
`map_const_principal_coprod_map_id_principal`, this provides an example showing that the inequality
in the lemma `map_prod_map_coprod_le` can be strict. -/
lemma map_prod_map_const_id_principal_coprod_principal {α β ι : Type*} (a : α) (b : β) (i : ι) :
map (prod.map (λ _ : α, b) id) ((𝓟 {a}).coprod (𝓟 {i}))
= 𝓟 (({b} : set β).prod (univ : set ι)) :=
begin
rw [principal_coprod_principal, map_principal],
congr,
ext ⟨b', i'⟩,
split,
{ rintro ⟨⟨a'', i''⟩, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩,
simp },
{ rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
use (a, i'),
simpa using h₁.symm }
end
lemma tendsto.prod_map_coprod {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : filter α} {b : filter β}
{c : filter γ} {d : filter δ} (hf : tendsto f a c) (hg : tendsto g b d) :
tendsto (prod.map f g) (a.coprod b) (c.coprod d) :=
map_prod_map_coprod_le.trans (coprod_mono hf hg)
end coprod
/-! ### `n`-ary coproducts of filters -/
section Coprod
variables {δ : Type*} {κ : δ → Type*} -- {f : Π d, filter (κ d)}
/-- Coproduct of filters. -/
protected def Coprod (f : Π d, filter (κ d)) : filter (Π d, κ d) :=
⨆ d : δ, (f d).comap (λ k, k d)
lemma mem_Coprod_iff {s : set (Π d, κ d)} {f : Π d, filter (κ d)} :
(s ∈ (filter.Coprod f)) ↔ (∀ d : δ, (∃ t₁ ∈ f d, (λ k : (Π d, κ d), k d) ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s)) :=
by simp [filter.Coprod]
lemma Coprod_ne_bot_iff' {f : Π d, filter (κ d)} :
ne_bot (filter.Coprod f) ↔ (∀ d, nonempty (κ d)) ∧ ∃ d, ne_bot (f d) :=
by simp only [filter.Coprod, supr_ne_bot, ← exists_and_distrib_left, ← comap_eval_ne_bot_iff']
@[simp] lemma Coprod_ne_bot_iff [∀ d, nonempty (κ d)] {f : Π d, filter (κ d)} :
ne_bot (filter.Coprod f) ↔ ∃ d, ne_bot (f d) :=
by simp [Coprod_ne_bot_iff', *]
lemma ne_bot.Coprod [∀ d, nonempty (κ d)] {f : Π d, filter (κ d)} {d : δ} (h : ne_bot (f d)) :
ne_bot (filter.Coprod f) :=
Coprod_ne_bot_iff.2 ⟨d, h⟩
@[instance] lemma Coprod_ne_bot [∀ d, nonempty (κ d)] [nonempty δ] (f : Π d, filter (κ d))
[H : ∀ d, ne_bot (f d)] : ne_bot (filter.Coprod f) :=
(H (classical.arbitrary δ)).Coprod
@[mono] lemma Coprod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Π d, filter (κ d)} (hf : ∀ d, f₁ d ≤ f₂ d) :
filter.Coprod f₁ ≤ filter.Coprod f₂ :=
supr_le_supr $ λ d, comap_mono (hf d)
lemma map_pi_map_Coprod_le {μ : δ → Type*}
{f : Π d, filter (κ d)} {m : Π d, κ d → μ d} :
map (λ (k : Π d, κ d), λ d, m d (k d)) (filter.Coprod f) ≤ filter.Coprod (λ d, map (m d) (f d)) :=
begin
intros s h,
rw [mem_map', mem_Coprod_iff],
intros d,
rw mem_Coprod_iff at h,
obtain ⟨t, H, hH⟩ := h d,
rw mem_map at H,
refine ⟨{x : κ d | m d x ∈ t}, H, _⟩,
intros x hx,
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, preimage_set_of_eq] at hx,
rw mem_set_of_eq,
exact set.mem_of_subset_of_mem hH (mem_preimage.mpr hx),
end
lemma tendsto.pi_map_Coprod {μ : δ → Type*} {f : Π d, filter (κ d)} {m : Π d, κ d → μ d}
{g : Π d, filter (μ d)} (hf : ∀ d, tendsto (m d) (f d) (g d)) :
tendsto (λ (k : Π d, κ d), λ d, m d (k d)) (filter.Coprod f) (filter.Coprod g) :=
map_pi_map_Coprod_le.trans (Coprod_mono hf)
end Coprod
end filter
open_locale filter
lemma set.eq_on.eventually_eq {α β} {s : set α} {f g : α → β} (h : eq_on f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
lemma set.eq_on.eventually_eq_of_mem {α β} {s : set α} {l : filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : eq_on f g s) (hl : s ∈ l) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventually_eq.filter_mono $ filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
lemma set.subset.eventually_le {α} {l : filter α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
filter.eventually_of_forall h
lemma set.maps_to.tendsto {α β} {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} (h : maps_to f s t) :
filter.tendsto f (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t) :=
filter.tendsto_principal_principal.2 h
|
26ca4b8f839c042eacfac65198765f81d23d6bd4 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /library/algebra/group_power.lean | df414e432011d74c69e4eb75c2f39387b4954c34 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,374 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad
The power operation on monoids and groups. We separate this from group, because it depends on
nat, which in turn depends on other parts of algebra.
We have "pow a n" for natural number powers, and "gpow a i" for integer powers. The notation
a^n is used for the first, but users can locally redefine it to gpow when needed.
Note: power adopts the convention that 0^0=1.
-/
import data.nat.basic data.int.basic
variables {A : Type}
structure has_pow_nat [class] (A : Type) :=
(pow_nat : A → nat → A)
definition pow_nat {A : Type} [s : has_pow_nat A] : A → nat → A :=
has_pow_nat.pow_nat
infix ` ^ ` := pow_nat
structure has_pow_int [class] (A : Type) :=
(pow_int : A → int → A)
definition pow_int {A : Type} [s : has_pow_int A] : A → int → A :=
has_pow_int.pow_int
/- monoid -/
section monoid
open nat
variable [s : monoid A]
include s
definition monoid.pow (a : A) : ℕ → A
| 0 := 1
| (n+1) := a * monoid.pow n
attribute [instance]
definition monoid_has_pow_nat : has_pow_nat A :=
has_pow_nat.mk monoid.pow
theorem pow_zero (a : A) : a^0 = 1 := rfl
theorem pow_succ (a : A) (n : ℕ) : a^(succ n) = a * a^n := rfl
theorem pow_one (a : A) : a^1 = a := !mul_one
theorem pow_two (a : A) : a^2 = a * a :=
calc
a^2 = a * (a * 1) : rfl
... = a * a : mul_one
theorem pow_three (a : A) : a^3 = a * (a * a) :=
calc
a^3 = a * (a * (a * 1)) : rfl
... = a * (a * a) : mul_one
theorem pow_four (a : A) : a^4 = a * (a * (a * a)) :=
calc
a^4 = a * a^3 : rfl
... = a * (a * (a * a)) : pow_three
theorem pow_succ' (a : A) : ∀n, a^(succ n) = a^n * a
| 0 := by rewrite [pow_succ, *pow_zero, one_mul, mul_one]
| (succ n) := by rewrite [pow_succ, pow_succ' at {1}, pow_succ, mul.assoc]
theorem one_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, 1^n = (1:A)
| 0 := rfl
| (succ n) := by rewrite [pow_succ, one_mul, one_pow]
theorem pow_add (a : A) (m n : ℕ) : a^(m + n) = a^m * a^n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{krewrite [nat.add_zero, pow_zero, mul_one]},
rewrite [add_succ, *pow_succ', ih, mul.assoc]
end
theorem pow_mul (a : A) (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, a^(m * n) = (a^m)^n
| 0 := by rewrite [nat.mul_zero, pow_zero]
| (succ n) := by rewrite [nat.mul_succ, pow_add, pow_succ', pow_mul]
theorem pow_comm (a : A) (m n : ℕ) : a^m * a^n = a^n * a^m :=
by rewrite [-*pow_add, add.comm]
end monoid
/- commutative monoid -/
section comm_monoid
open nat
variable [s : comm_monoid A]
include s
theorem mul_pow (a b : A) : ∀ n, (a * b)^n = a^n * b^n
| 0 := by rewrite [*pow_zero, mul_one]
| (succ n) := by rewrite [*pow_succ', mul_pow, *mul.assoc, mul.left_comm a]
end comm_monoid
section group
variable [s : group A]
include s
section nat
open nat
theorem inv_pow (a : A) : ∀n, (a⁻¹)^n = (a^n)⁻¹
| 0 := by rewrite [*pow_zero, one_inv]
| (succ n) := by rewrite [pow_succ, pow_succ', inv_pow, mul_inv]
theorem pow_sub (a : A) {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≥ n) : a^(m - n) = a^m * (a^n)⁻¹ :=
have H1 : m - n + n = m, from nat.sub_add_cancel H,
have H2 : a^(m - n) * a^n = a^m, by rewrite [-pow_add, H1],
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq H2
theorem pow_inv_comm (a : A) : ∀m n, (a⁻¹)^m * a^n = a^n * (a⁻¹)^m
| 0 n := by rewrite [*pow_zero, one_mul, mul_one]
| m 0 := by rewrite [*pow_zero, one_mul, mul_one]
| (succ m) (succ n) := by rewrite [pow_succ' at {1}, pow_succ at {1}, pow_succ', pow_succ,
*mul.assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left, mul_inv_cancel_left, pow_inv_comm]
end nat
open int
definition gpow (a : A) : ℤ → A
| (of_nat n) := a^n
| -[1+n] := (a^(nat.succ n))⁻¹
open nat
private lemma gpow_add_aux (a : A) (m n : nat) :
gpow a ((of_nat m) + -[1+n]) = gpow a (of_nat m) * gpow a (-[1+n]) :=
or.elim (nat.lt_or_ge m (nat.succ n))
(assume H : (m < nat.succ n),
have H1 : (#nat nat.succ n - m > nat.zero), from nat.sub_pos_of_lt H,
calc
gpow a ((of_nat m) + -[1+n]) = gpow a (sub_nat_nat m (nat.succ n)) : rfl
... = gpow a (-[1+ nat.pred (nat.sub (nat.succ n) m)]) : {sub_nat_nat_of_lt H}
... = (a ^ (nat.succ (nat.pred (nat.sub (nat.succ n) m))))⁻¹ : rfl
... = (a ^ (nat.succ n) * (a ^ m)⁻¹)⁻¹ :
by krewrite [succ_pred_of_pos H1, pow_sub a (nat.le_of_lt H)]
... = a ^ m * (a ^ (nat.succ n))⁻¹ :
by rewrite [mul_inv, inv_inv]
... = gpow a (of_nat m) * gpow a (-[1+n]) : rfl)
(assume H : (m ≥ nat.succ n),
calc
gpow a ((of_nat m) + -[1+n]) = gpow a (sub_nat_nat m (nat.succ n)) : rfl
... = gpow a (#nat m - nat.succ n) : {sub_nat_nat_of_ge H}
... = a ^ m * (a ^ (nat.succ n))⁻¹ : pow_sub a H
... = gpow a (of_nat m) * gpow a (-[1+n]) : rfl)
theorem gpow_add (a : A) : ∀i j : int, gpow a (i + j) = gpow a i * gpow a j
| (of_nat m) (of_nat n) := !pow_add
| (of_nat m) -[1+n] := !gpow_add_aux
| -[1+m] (of_nat n) := by rewrite [add.comm, gpow_add_aux, ↑gpow, -*inv_pow, pow_inv_comm]
| -[1+m] -[1+n] :=
calc
gpow a (-[1+m] + -[1+n]) = (a^(#nat nat.succ m + nat.succ n))⁻¹ : rfl
... = (a^(nat.succ m))⁻¹ * (a^(nat.succ n))⁻¹ : by rewrite [pow_add, pow_comm, mul_inv]
... = gpow a (-[1+m]) * gpow a (-[1+n]) : rfl
theorem gpow_comm (a : A) (i j : ℤ) : gpow a i * gpow a j = gpow a j * gpow a i :=
by rewrite [-*gpow_add, add.comm]
end group
section ordered_ring
open nat
variable [s : linear_ordered_ring A]
include s
theorem pow_pos {a : A} (H : a > 0) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n > 0 :=
begin
induction n,
krewrite pow_zero,
apply zero_lt_one,
rewrite pow_succ',
apply mul_pos,
apply v_0, apply H
end
theorem pow_ge_one_of_ge_one {a : A} (H : a ≥ 1) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n ≥ 1 :=
begin
induction n,
krewrite pow_zero,
apply le.refl,
rewrite [pow_succ', -mul_one 1],
apply mul_le_mul v_0 H zero_le_one,
apply le_of_lt,
apply pow_pos,
apply gt_of_ge_of_gt H zero_lt_one
end
theorem pow_two_add (n : ℕ) : (2:A)^n + 2^n = 2^(succ n) :=
by rewrite [pow_succ', -one_add_one_eq_two, left_distrib, *mul_one]
end ordered_ring
/- additive monoid -/
section add_monoid
variable [s : add_monoid A]
include s
local attribute add_monoid.to_monoid [trans_instance]
open nat
definition nmul : ℕ → A → A := λ n a, a^n
infix [priority algebra.prio] `⬝` := nmul
theorem zero_nmul (a : A) : (0:ℕ) ⬝ a = 0 := pow_zero a
theorem succ_nmul (n : ℕ) (a : A) : nmul (succ n) a = a + (nmul n a) := pow_succ a n
theorem succ_nmul' (n : ℕ) (a : A) : succ n ⬝ a = nmul n a + a := pow_succ' a n
theorem nmul_zero (n : ℕ) : n ⬝ 0 = (0:A) := one_pow n
theorem one_nmul (a : A) : 1 ⬝ a = a := pow_one a
theorem add_nmul (m n : ℕ) (a : A) : (m + n) ⬝ a = (m ⬝ a) + (n ⬝ a) := pow_add a m n
theorem mul_nmul (m n : ℕ) (a : A) : (m * n) ⬝ a = m ⬝ (n ⬝ a) := eq.subst (mul.comm n m) (pow_mul a n m)
theorem nmul_comm (m n : ℕ) (a : A) : (m ⬝ a) + (n ⬝ a) = (n ⬝ a) + (m ⬝ a) := pow_comm a m n
end add_monoid
/- additive commutative monoid -/
section add_comm_monoid
open nat
variable [s : add_comm_monoid A]
include s
local attribute add_comm_monoid.to_comm_monoid [trans_instance]
theorem nmul_add (n : ℕ) (a b : A) : n ⬝ (a + b) = (n ⬝ a) + (n ⬝ b) := mul_pow a b n
end add_comm_monoid
section add_group
variable [s : add_group A]
include s
local attribute add_group.to_group [trans_instance]
section nat
open nat
theorem nmul_neg (n : ℕ) (a : A) : n ⬝ (-a) = -(n ⬝ a) := inv_pow a n
theorem sub_nmul {m n : ℕ} (a : A) (H : m ≥ n) : (m - n) ⬝ a = (m ⬝ a) + -(n ⬝ a) := pow_sub a H
theorem nmul_neg_comm (m n : ℕ) (a : A) : (m ⬝ (-a)) + (n ⬝ a) = (n ⬝ a) + (m ⬝ (-a)) := pow_inv_comm a m n
end nat
open int
definition imul : ℤ → A → A := λ i a, gpow a i
theorem add_imul (i j : ℤ) (a : A) : imul (i + j) a = imul i a + imul j a :=
gpow_add a i j
theorem imul_comm (i j : ℤ) (a : A) : imul i a + imul j a = imul j a + imul i a := gpow_comm a i j
end add_group
|
73ce5f7d922c9052a6554c4c0721030aa070a571 | aa3f8992ef7806974bc1ffd468baa0c79f4d6643 | /library/logic/axioms/hilbert.lean | 7cd5debd4b279a5f6b4a459fa5dbce95501d5298 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean | 7f8dff750722c5382bdd0a9a9275dc4bb2c58dd3 | 0cca265db19f7296531e339192e9b9bae4a31f8b | refs/heads/master | 1,610,909,964,159 | 1,407,084,399,000 | 1,416,857,075,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,628 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-- logic.axioms.hilbert
-- ====================
-- Follows Coq.Logic.ClassicalEpsilon (but our definition of "inhabited" is the
-- constructive one).
import logic.quantifiers
import logic.inhabited logic.nonempty
import data.subtype data.sum
open subtype inhabited nonempty
-- the axiom
-- ---------
axiom strong_indefinite_description {A : Type} (P : A → Prop) (H : nonempty A) :
{ x | (∃y : A, P y) → P x}
-- In the presence of classical logic, we could prove this from the weaker
-- axiom indefinite_description {A : Type} {P : A->Prop} (H : ∃x, P x) : {x : A, P x}
theorem nonempty_imp_exists_true {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) : ∃x : A, true :=
nonempty.elim H (take x, exists_intro x trivial)
theorem nonempty_imp_inhabited {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) : inhabited A :=
let u : {x | (∃y : A, true) → true} := strong_indefinite_description (λa, true) H in
inhabited.mk (elt_of u)
theorem exists_imp_inhabited {A : Type} {P : A → Prop} (H : ∃x, P x) : inhabited A :=
nonempty_imp_inhabited (obtain w Hw, from H, nonempty.intro w)
-- the Hilbert epsilon function
-- ----------------------------
opaque definition epsilon {A : Type} [H : nonempty A] (P : A → Prop) : A :=
let u : {x | (∃y, P y) → P x} :=
strong_indefinite_description P H in
elt_of u
theorem epsilon_spec_aux {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) (P : A → Prop) (Hex : ∃y, P y) :
P (@epsilon A H P) :=
let u : {x | (∃y, P y) → P x} :=
strong_indefinite_description P H in
has_property u Hex
theorem epsilon_spec {A : Type} {P : A → Prop} (Hex : ∃y, P y) :
P (@epsilon A (exists_imp_nonempty Hex) P) :=
epsilon_spec_aux (exists_imp_nonempty Hex) P Hex
theorem epsilon_singleton {A : Type} (a : A) : @epsilon A (nonempty.intro a) (λx, x = a) = a :=
epsilon_spec (exists_intro a (eq.refl a))
-- the axiom of choice
-- -------------------
theorem axiom_of_choice {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {R : Πx, B x → Prop} (H : ∀x, ∃y, R x y) :
∃f, ∀x, R x (f x) :=
let f := λx, @epsilon _ (exists_imp_nonempty (H x)) (λy, R x y),
H := take x, epsilon_spec (H x)
in exists_intro f H
theorem skolem {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {P : Πx, B x → Prop} :
(∀x, ∃y, P x y) ↔ ∃f, (∀x, P x (f x)) :=
iff.intro
(assume H : (∀x, ∃y, P x y), axiom_of_choice H)
(assume H : (∃f, (∀x, P x (f x))),
take x, obtain (fw : ∀x, B x) (Hw : ∀x, P x (fw x)), from H,
exists_intro (fw x) (Hw x))
|
d27a17b11757e1158f382abfb0d8bc65f9be4eb8 | a338c3e75cecad4fb8d091bfe505f7399febfd2b | /src/analysis/normed_space/basic.lean | 2a2c1ef151d2fa325313239742f9f219268c4c2a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bacaimano/mathlib | 88eb7911a9054874fba2a2b74ccd0627c90188af | f2edc5a3529d95699b43514d6feb7eb11608723f | refs/heads/master | 1,686,410,075,833 | 1,625,497,070,000 | 1,625,497,070,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 83,473 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.punit_instances
import topology.instances.nnreal
import topology.algebra.module
import topology.algebra.algebra
import topology.algebra.group_completion
import topology.metric_space.completion
import topology.algebra.ordered.liminf_limsup
/-!
# Normed spaces
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `∥x∥ = 0 → x = 0` we start setting up the
theory of `semi_normed_group` and we specialize to `normed_group` at the end.
-/
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {ι : Type*}
noncomputable theory
open filter metric
open_locale topological_space big_operators nnreal ennreal
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`. This class is designed to
be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm. -/
class has_norm (α : Type*) := (norm : α → ℝ)
export has_norm (norm)
notation `∥` e `∥` := norm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ∥x - y∥`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class semi_normed_group (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, add_comm_group α, pseudo_metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ∥x - y∥` defines
a metric space structure. -/
class normed_group (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, add_comm_group α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
/-- A normed group is a seminormed group. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_group.to_semi_normed_group [β : normed_group α] : semi_normed_group α :=
{ ..β }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a translation invariant pseudodistance -/
def semi_normed_group.of_add_dist [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [pseudo_metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist x y ≤ dist (x + z) (y + z)) : semi_normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 },
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this }
end }
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a translation invariant pseudodistance -/
def semi_normed_group.of_add_dist' [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [pseudo_metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist (x + z) (y + z) ≤ dist x y) : semi_normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this },
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 }
end }
/-- A seminormed group can be built from a seminorm that satisfies algebraic properties. This is
formalised in this structure. -/
structure semi_normed_group.core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α] : Prop :=
(norm_zero : ∥(0 : α)∥ = 0)
(triangle : ∀ x y : α, ∥x + y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + ∥y∥)
(norm_neg : ∀ x : α, ∥-x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- Constructing a seminormed group from core properties of a seminorm, i.e., registering the
pseudodistance and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. -/
noncomputable def semi_normed_group.of_core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α]
(C : semi_normed_group.core α) : semi_normed_group α :=
{ dist := λ x y, ∥x - y∥,
dist_eq := assume x y, by refl,
dist_self := assume x, by simp [C.norm_zero],
dist_triangle := assume x y z,
calc ∥x - z∥ = ∥x - y + (y - z)∥ : by rw sub_add_sub_cancel
... ≤ ∥x - y∥ + ∥y - z∥ : C.triangle _ _,
dist_comm := assume x y,
calc ∥x - y∥ = ∥ -(y - x)∥ : by simp
... = ∥y - x∥ : by { rw [C.norm_neg] } }
instance : normed_group punit :=
{ norm := function.const _ 0,
dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl, }
@[simp] lemma punit.norm_eq_zero (r : punit) : ∥r∥ = 0 := rfl
instance : normed_group ℝ :=
{ norm := λ x, abs x,
dist_eq := assume x y, rfl }
lemma real.norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ∥r∥ = abs r := rfl
section semi_normed_group
variables [semi_normed_group α] [semi_normed_group β]
lemma dist_eq_norm (g h : α) : dist g h = ∥g - h∥ :=
semi_normed_group.dist_eq _ _
lemma dist_eq_norm' (g h : α) : dist g h = ∥h - g∥ :=
by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_zero_right (g : α) : dist g 0 = ∥g∥ :=
by rw [dist_eq_norm, sub_zero]
@[simp] lemma dist_zero_left : dist (0:α) = norm :=
funext $ λ g, by rw [dist_comm, dist_zero_right]
lemma tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top [proper_space α] :
tendsto norm (cocompact α) at_top :=
by simpa only [dist_zero_right] using tendsto_dist_right_cocompact_at_top (0:α)
lemma norm_sub_rev (g h : α) : ∥g - h∥ = ∥h - g∥ :=
by simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using dist_comm g h
@[simp] lemma norm_neg (g : α) : ∥-g∥ = ∥g∥ :=
by simpa using norm_sub_rev 0 g
@[simp] lemma dist_add_left (g h₁ h₂ : α) : dist (g + h₁) (g + h₂) = dist h₁ h₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_add_right (g₁ g₂ h : α) : dist (g₁ + h) (g₂ + h) = dist g₁ g₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_neg_neg (g h : α) : dist (-g) (-h) = dist g h :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, neg_sub_neg, norm_sub_rev]
@[simp] lemma dist_sub_left (g h₁ h₂ : α) : dist (g - h₁) (g - h₂) = dist h₁ h₂ :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, dist_add_left, dist_neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma dist_sub_right (g₁ g₂ h : α) : dist (g₁ - h) (g₂ - h) = dist g₁ g₂ :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using dist_add_right _ _ _
/-- Triangle inequality for the norm. -/
lemma norm_add_le (g h : α) : ∥g + h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using dist_triangle g 0 (-h)
lemma norm_add_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ : α} {n₁ n₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ∥g₁∥ ≤ n₁) (H₂ : ∥g₂∥ ≤ n₂) :
∥g₁ + g₂∥ ≤ n₁ + n₂ :=
le_trans (norm_add_le g₁ g₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ dist g₁ h₁ + dist g₂ h₂ :=
by simpa only [dist_add_left, dist_add_right] using dist_triangle (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂)
lemma dist_add_add_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α} {d₁ d₂ : ℝ}
(H₁ : dist g₁ h₁ ≤ d₁) (H₂ : dist g₂ h₂ ≤ d₂) :
dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ d₁ + d₂ :=
le_trans (dist_add_add_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_sub_sub_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
dist (g₁ - g₂) (h₁ - h₂) ≤ dist g₁ h₁ + dist g₂ h₂ :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, dist_neg_neg] using dist_add_add_le g₁ (-g₂) h₁ (-h₂)
lemma dist_sub_sub_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α} {d₁ d₂ : ℝ}
(H₁ : dist g₁ h₁ ≤ d₁) (H₂ : dist g₂ h₂ ≤ d₂) :
dist (g₁ - g₂) (h₁ - h₂) ≤ d₁ + d₂ :=
le_trans (dist_sub_sub_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma abs_dist_sub_le_dist_add_add (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
abs (dist g₁ h₁ - dist g₂ h₂) ≤ dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) :=
by simpa only [dist_add_left, dist_add_right, dist_comm h₂]
using abs_dist_sub_le (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) (h₁ + g₂)
@[simp] lemma norm_nonneg (g : α) : 0 ≤ ∥g∥ :=
by { rw[←dist_zero_right], exact dist_nonneg }
@[simp] lemma norm_zero : ∥(0:α)∥ = 0 := by rw [← dist_zero_right, dist_self]
@[nontriviality] lemma norm_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] (x : α) : ∥x∥ = 0 :=
by rw [subsingleton.elim x 0, norm_zero]
lemma norm_sum_le {β} : ∀(s : finset β) (f : β → α), ∥∑ a in s, f a∥ ≤ ∑ a in s, ∥ f a ∥ :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
lemma norm_sum_le_of_le {β} (s : finset β) {f : β → α} {n : β → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ∥f b∥ ≤ n b) :
∥∑ b in s, f b∥ ≤ ∑ b in s, n b :=
le_trans (norm_sum_le s f) (finset.sum_le_sum h)
lemma norm_sub_le (g h : α) : ∥g - h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using dist_triangle g 0 h
lemma norm_sub_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ : α} {n₁ n₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ∥g₁∥ ≤ n₁) (H₂ : ∥g₂∥ ≤ n₂) :
∥g₁ - g₂∥ ≤ n₁ + n₂ :=
le_trans (norm_sub_le g₁ g₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_le_norm_add_norm (g h : α) : dist g h ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by { rw dist_eq_norm, apply norm_sub_le }
lemma abs_norm_sub_norm_le (g h : α) : abs(∥g∥ - ∥h∥) ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using abs_dist_sub_le g h 0
lemma norm_sub_norm_le (g h : α) : ∥g∥ - ∥h∥ ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_norm_sub_norm_le g h)
lemma dist_norm_norm_le (g h : α) : dist ∥g∥ ∥h∥ ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le g h
lemma norm_le_insert (u v : α) : ∥v∥ ≤ ∥u∥ + ∥u - v∥ :=
calc ∥v∥ = ∥u - (u - v)∥ : by abel
... ≤ ∥u∥ + ∥u - v∥ : norm_sub_le u _
lemma norm_le_insert' (u v : α) : ∥u∥ ≤ ∥v∥ + ∥u - v∥ :=
by { rw norm_sub_rev, exact norm_le_insert v u }
lemma ball_0_eq (ε : ℝ) : ball (0:α) ε = {x | ∥x∥ < ε} :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp
lemma mem_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ ball g r ↔ ∥h - g∥ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm]
lemma add_mem_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
g + h ∈ ball g r ↔ ∥h∥ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball_iff_norm, add_sub_cancel']
lemma mem_ball_iff_norm' {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ ball g r ↔ ∥g - h∥ < r :=
by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma mem_ball_0_iff {ε : ℝ} {x : α} : x ∈ ball (0 : α) ε ↔ ∥x∥ < ε :=
by rw [mem_ball, dist_zero_right]
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ closed_ball g r ↔ ∥h - g∥ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm]
lemma add_mem_closed_ball_iff_norm {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
g + h ∈ closed_ball g r ↔ ∥h∥ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball_iff_norm, add_sub_cancel']
lemma mem_closed_ball_iff_norm' {g h : α} {r : ℝ} :
h ∈ closed_ball g r ↔ ∥g - h∥ ≤ r :=
by rw [mem_closed_ball', dist_eq_norm]
lemma norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball {g h : α} {r : ℝ} (H : h ∈ closed_ball g r) :
∥h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + r :=
calc
∥h∥ = ∥g + (h - g)∥ : by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
... ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h - g∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... ≤ ∥g∥ + r : by { apply add_le_add_left, rw ← dist_eq_norm, exact H }
lemma norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le {a b : α} {c : ℝ} (h : dist a b ≤ c) :
∥a∥ ≤ ∥b∥ + c :=
norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball h
lemma norm_lt_of_mem_ball {g h : α} {r : ℝ} (H : h ∈ ball g r) :
∥h∥ < ∥g∥ + r :=
calc
∥h∥ = ∥g + (h - g)∥ : by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
... ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h - g∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... < ∥g∥ + r : by { apply add_lt_add_left, rw ← dist_eq_norm, exact H }
lemma norm_lt_norm_add_const_of_dist_lt {a b : α} {c : ℝ} (h : dist a b < c) :
∥a∥ < ∥b∥ + c :=
norm_lt_of_mem_ball h
lemma bounded_iff_forall_norm_le {s : set α} : bounded s ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ∥x∥ ≤ C :=
begin
rw bounded_iff_subset_ball (0 : α),
exact exists_congr (λ r, by simp [(⊆), set.subset]),
end
@[simp] lemma mem_sphere_iff_norm (v w : α) (r : ℝ) : w ∈ sphere v r ↔ ∥w - v∥ = r :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm {w : α} {r : ℝ} : w ∈ sphere (0:α) r ↔ ∥w∥ = r :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_of_mem_sphere {r : ℝ} (x : sphere (0:α) r) : ∥(x:α)∥ = r :=
mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm.mp x.2
lemma ne_zero_of_norm_pos {g : α} : 0 < ∥ g ∥ → g ≠ 0 :=
begin
intros hpos hzero,
rw [hzero, norm_zero] at hpos,
exact lt_irrefl 0 hpos,
end
lemma nonzero_of_mem_sphere {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : sphere (0:α) r) : (x:α) ≠ 0 :=
begin
refine ne_zero_of_norm_pos _,
rwa norm_eq_of_mem_sphere x,
end
lemma nonzero_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (0:α) 1) : (x:α) ≠ 0 :=
by { apply nonzero_of_mem_sphere, norm_num }
/-- We equip the sphere, in a seminormed group, with a formal operation of negation, namely the
antipodal map. -/
instance {r : ℝ} : has_neg (sphere (0:α) r) :=
{ neg := λ w, ⟨-↑w, by simp⟩ }
@[simp] lemma coe_neg_sphere {r : ℝ} (v : sphere (0:α) r) :
(((-v) : sphere _ _) : α) = - (v:α) :=
rfl
namespace isometric
/-- Addition `y ↦ y + x` as an `isometry`. -/
protected def add_right (x : α) : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 $ λ y z, dist_add_right _ _ _,
.. equiv.add_right x }
@[simp] lemma add_right_to_equiv (x : α) :
(isometric.add_right x).to_equiv = equiv.add_right x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add_right (x : α) : (isometric.add_right x : α → α) = λ y, y + x := rfl
lemma add_right_apply (x y : α) : (isometric.add_right x : α → α) y = y + x := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_right_symm (x : α) :
(isometric.add_right x).symm = isometric.add_right (-x) :=
ext $ λ y, rfl
/-- Addition `y ↦ x + y` as an `isometry`. -/
protected def add_left (x : α) : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 $ λ y z, dist_add_left _ _ _,
to_equiv := equiv.add_left x }
@[simp] lemma add_left_to_equiv (x : α) :
(isometric.add_left x).to_equiv = equiv.add_left x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add_left (x : α) : ⇑(isometric.add_left x) = (+) x := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_left_symm (x : α) :
(isometric.add_left x).symm = isometric.add_left (-x) :=
ext $ λ y, rfl
variable (α)
/-- Negation `x ↦ -x` as an `isometry`. -/
protected def neg : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ isometry_to_fun := isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 $ λ x y, dist_neg_neg _ _,
to_equiv := equiv.neg α }
variable {α}
@[simp] lemma neg_symm : (isometric.neg α).symm = isometric.neg α := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_to_equiv : (isometric.neg α).to_equiv = equiv.neg α := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_neg : ⇑(isometric.neg α) = has_neg.neg := rfl
end isometric
theorem normed_group.tendsto_nhds_zero {f : γ → α} {l : filter γ} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ∥ f x ∥ < ε :=
metric.tendsto_nhds.trans $ by simp only [dist_zero_right]
lemma normed_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : α → β} {x : α} {y : β} :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ∥x' - x∥ < δ → ∥f x' - y∥ < ε :=
by simp_rw [metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm]
lemma normed_group.cauchy_seq_iff {u : ℕ → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → ∥u m - u n∥ < ε :=
by simp [metric.cauchy_seq_iff, dist_eq_norm]
lemma cauchy_seq.add {u v : ℕ → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u) (hv : cauchy_seq v) : cauchy_seq (u + v) :=
begin
rw normed_group.cauchy_seq_iff at *,
intros ε ε_pos,
rcases hu (ε/2) (half_pos ε_pos) with ⟨Nu, hNu⟩,
rcases hv (ε/2) (half_pos ε_pos) with ⟨Nv, hNv⟩,
use max Nu Nv,
intros m n hm hn,
replace hm := max_le_iff.mp hm,
replace hn := max_le_iff.mp hn,
calc ∥(u + v) m - (u + v) n∥ = ∥u m + v m - (u n + v n)∥ : rfl
... = ∥(u m - u n) + (v m - v n)∥ : by abel
... ≤ ∥u m - u n∥ + ∥v m - v n∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... < ε : by linarith only [hNu m n hm.1 hn.1, hNv m n hm.2 hn.2]
end
open finset
lemma cauchy_seq_sum_of_eventually_eq {u v : ℕ → α} {N : ℕ} (huv : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = v n)
(hv : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range (n+1), v k)) : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) :=
begin
let d : ℕ → α := λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), (u k - v k),
rw show (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) = d + (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), v k),
by { ext n, simp [d] },
have : ∀ n ≥ N, d n = d N,
{ intros n hn,
dsimp [d],
rw eventually_constant_sum _ hn,
intros m hm,
simp [huv m hm] },
exact (tendsto_at_top_of_eventually_const this).cauchy_seq.add hv
end
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
lemma add_monoid_hom.lipschitz_of_bound (f :α →+ β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
lipschitz_with (real.to_nnreal C) f :=
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le' $ λ x y, by simpa only [dist_eq_norm, f.map_sub] using h (x - y)
lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le {f : α → β} {C : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} :
lipschitz_on_with C f s ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ∥f x - f y∥ ≤ C * ∥x - y∥ :=
by simp only [lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm]
lemma lipschitz_on_with.norm_sub_le {f : α → β} {C : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} (h : lipschitz_on_with C f s)
{x y : α} (x_in : x ∈ s) (y_in : y ∈ s) : ∥f x - f y∥ ≤ C * ∥x - y∥ :=
lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le.mp h x x_in y y_in
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥`.
The analogous condition for a linear map of normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
lemma add_monoid_hom.continuous_of_bound (f : α →+ β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
continuous f :=
(f.lipschitz_of_bound C h).continuous
lemma is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ]
{s : set γ} (hs : is_compact s) {f : γ → α} (hf : continuous_on f s) :
∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ∥f x∥ ≤ C :=
begin
have : bounded (f '' s) := (hs.image_of_continuous_on hf).bounded,
rcases bounded_iff_forall_norm_le.1 this with ⟨C, hC⟩,
exact ⟨C, λ x hx, hC _ (set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx)⟩,
end
lemma add_monoid_hom.isometry_iff_norm (f : α →+ β) : isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ∥f x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
begin
simp only [isometry_emetric_iff_metric, dist_eq_norm, ← f.map_sub],
refine ⟨λ h x, _, λ h x y, h _⟩,
simpa using h x 0
end
lemma add_monoid_hom.isometry_of_norm (f : α →+ β) (hf : ∀ x, ∥f x∥ = ∥x∥) : isometry f :=
f.isometry_iff_norm.2 hf
section nnnorm
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0`. -/
class has_nnnorm (α : Type*) := (nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0)
export has_nnnorm (nnnorm)
notation `∥`e`∥₊` := nnnorm e
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_group.to_has_nnnorm : has_nnnorm α := ⟨λ a, ⟨norm a, norm_nonneg a⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nnnorm (a : α) : (∥a∥₊ : ℝ) = norm a := rfl
lemma nndist_eq_nnnorm (a b : α) : nndist a b = ∥a - b∥₊ := nnreal.eq $ dist_eq_norm _ _
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_zero : ∥(0 : α)∥₊ = 0 :=
nnreal.eq norm_zero
lemma nnnorm_add_le (g h : α) : ∥g + h∥₊ ≤ ∥g∥₊ + ∥h∥₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ norm_add_le g h
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_neg (g : α) : ∥-g∥₊ = ∥g∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_neg g
lemma nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le (g h : α) : nndist ∥g∥₊ ∥h∥₊ ≤ ∥g - h∥₊ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ dist_norm_norm_le g h
lemma of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm (x : β) : ennreal.of_real ∥x∥ = (∥x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal _
lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub (x y : β) : edist x y = (∥x - y∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm (x : β) : edist x 0 = (∥x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) :=
by rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, _root_.sub_zero]
lemma mem_emetric_ball_0_iff {x : β} {r : ℝ≥0∞} : x ∈ emetric.ball (0 : β) r ↔ ↑∥x∥₊ < r :=
by rw [emetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma nndist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
nndist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ nndist g₁ h₁ + nndist g₂ h₂ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ dist_add_add_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂
lemma edist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
edist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ edist g₁ h₁ + edist g₂ h₂ :=
by { simp only [edist_nndist], norm_cast, apply nndist_add_add_le }
lemma nnnorm_sum_le {β} : ∀(s : finset β) (f : β → α),
∥∑ a in s, f a∥₊ ≤ ∑ a in s, ∥f a∥₊ :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive nnnorm nnnorm_zero nnnorm_add_le
end nnnorm
lemma lipschitz_with.neg {α : Type*} [pseudo_emetric_space α] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with K f) : lipschitz_with K (λ x, -f x) :=
λ x y, by simpa only [edist_dist, dist_neg_neg] using hf x y
lemma lipschitz_with.add {α : Type*} [pseudo_emetric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x + g x) :=
λ x y,
calc edist (f x + g x) (f y + g y) ≤ edist (f x) (f y) + edist (g x) (g y) :
edist_add_add_le _ _ _ _
... ≤ Kf * edist x y + Kg * edist x y :
add_le_add (hf x y) (hg x y)
... = (Kf + Kg) * edist x y :
(add_mul _ _ _).symm
lemma lipschitz_with.sub {α : Type*} [pseudo_emetric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x - g x) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
lemma antilipschitz_with.add_lipschitz_with {α : Type*} [pseudo_metric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} (hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g)
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ (λ x, f x + g x) :=
begin
refine antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist (λ x y, _),
rw [nnreal.coe_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
rw le_div_iff (nnreal.coe_pos.2 $ nnreal.sub_pos.2 hK),
rw [mul_comm, nnreal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hK), sub_mul],
calc ↑Kf⁻¹ * dist x y - Kg * dist x y ≤ dist (f x) (f y) - dist (g x) (g y) :
sub_le_sub (hf.mul_le_dist x y) (hg.dist_le_mul x y)
... ≤ _ : le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_dist_sub_le_dist_add_add _ _ _ _)
end
lemma antilipschitz_with.add_sub_lipschitz_with {α : Type*} [pseudo_metric_space α] {Kf : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} (hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : ℝ≥0} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg (g - f))
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ g :=
by simpa only [pi.sub_apply, add_sub_cancel'_right] using hf.add_lipschitz_with hg hK
/-- A subgroup of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group,
with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance add_subgroup.semi_normed_group {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] (s : add_subgroup E) :
semi_normed_group s :=
{ norm := λx, norm (x : E),
dist_eq := λx y, dist_eq_norm (x : E) (y : E) }
/-- If `x` is an element of a subgroup `s` of a seminormed group `E`, its norm in `s` is equal to
its norm in `E`. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_norm_subgroup {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] {s : add_subgroup E} (x : s) :
∥x∥ = ∥(x:E)∥ :=
rfl
/-- A submodule of a seminormed group is also a seminormed group, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance submodule.semi_normed_group {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} (s : submodule 𝕜 E) : semi_normed_group s :=
{ norm := λx, norm (x : E),
dist_eq := λx y, dist_eq_norm (x : E) (y : E) }
/-- If `x` is an element of a submodule `s` of a normed group `E`, its norm in `E` is equal to its
norm in `s`.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma submodule.norm_coe {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} {s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : s) :
∥(x : E)∥ = ∥x∥ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma submodule.norm_mk {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} {s : submodule 𝕜 E} (x : E) (hx : x ∈ s) :
∥(⟨x, hx⟩ : s)∥ = ∥x∥ :=
rfl
/-- seminormed group instance on the product of two seminormed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.semi_normed_group : semi_normed_group (α × β) :=
{ norm := λx, max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥,
dist_eq := assume (x y : α × β),
show max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) = (max ∥(x - y).1∥ ∥(x - y).2∥), by simp [dist_eq_norm] }
lemma prod.semi_norm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥ = (max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥) := rfl
lemma prod.nnsemi_norm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥₊ = max (∥x.1∥₊) (∥x.2∥₊) :=
by { have := x.semi_norm_def, simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at this, exact_mod_cast this }
lemma semi_norm_fst_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.1∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_left _ _
lemma semi_norm_snd_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.2∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_right _ _
lemma semi_norm_prod_le_iff {x : α × β} {r : ℝ} :
∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∥x.1∥ ≤ r ∧ ∥x.2∥ ≤ r :=
max_le_iff
/-- seminormed group instance on the product of finitely many seminormed groups,
using the sup norm. -/
instance pi.semi_normed_group {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (π i)] :
semi_normed_group (Πi, π i) :=
{ norm := λf, ((finset.sup finset.univ (λ b, ∥f b∥₊) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ),
dist_eq := assume x y,
congr_arg (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) $ congr_arg (finset.sup finset.univ) $ funext $ assume a,
show nndist (x a) (y a) = ∥x a - y a∥₊, from nndist_eq_nnnorm _ _ }
/-- The seminorm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_semi_norm_le_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) {x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ ≤ r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_le_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
/-- The seminorm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_semi_norm_lt_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) {x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ < r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ < r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_lt_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
lemma semi_norm_le_pi_norm {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (π i)] (x : Πi, π i)
(i : ι) : ∥x i∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
(pi_semi_norm_le_iff (norm_nonneg x)).1 (le_refl _) i
@[simp] lemma pi_semi_norm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) : ∥(λ i : ι, a)∥ = ∥a∥ :=
by simpa only [← dist_zero_right] using dist_pi_const a 0
@[simp] lemma pi_nnsemi_norm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) :
∥(λ i : ι, a)∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ pi_semi_norm_const a
lemma tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : ι → β} {a : filter ι} {b : β} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥f e - b∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { convert tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero, simp [dist_eq_norm] }
lemma is_bounded_under_of_tendsto {l : filter ι} {f : ι → α} {c : α}
(h : filter.tendsto f l (𝓝 c)) : is_bounded_under (≤) l (λ x, ∥f x∥) :=
⟨∥c∥ + 1, @tendsto.eventually ι α f _ _ (λ k, ∥k∥ ≤ ∥c∥ + 1) h (filter.eventually_iff_exists_mem.mpr
⟨metric.closed_ball c 1, metric.closed_ball_mem_nhds c zero_lt_one,
λ y hy, norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le hy⟩)⟩
lemma tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : γ → β} {a : filter γ} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 0) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥f e∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw [tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero], simp only [sub_zero] }
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `g` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`.
In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of
similar lemmas in `topology.metric_space.basic` and `topology.algebra.ordered`, the `'` version is
phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely. -/
lemma squeeze_zero_norm' {f : γ → α} {g : γ → ℝ} {t₀ : filter γ}
(h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ∥f n∥ ≤ g n)
(h' : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr
(squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall (λ n, norm_nonneg _)) h h')
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `g` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`. -/
lemma squeeze_zero_norm {f : γ → α} {g : γ → ℝ} {t₀ : filter γ}
(h : ∀ (n:γ), ∥f n∥ ≤ g n)
(h' : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) :
tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_of_forall h) h'
lemma tendsto_norm_sub_self (x : α) : tendsto (λ g : α, ∥g - x∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ g, (x:α)) (𝓝 x) _)
lemma tendsto_norm {x : α} : tendsto (λg : α, ∥g∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 ∥x∥) :=
by simpa using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : tendsto (λ g, (0:α)) _ _)
lemma tendsto_norm_zero : tendsto (λg : α, ∥g∥) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa using tendsto_norm_sub_self (0:α)
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_norm : continuous (λg:α, ∥g∥) :=
by simpa using continuous_id.dist (continuous_const : continuous (λ g, (0:α)))
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_nnnorm : continuous (λ (a : α), ∥a∥₊) :=
continuous_subtype_mk _ continuous_norm
lemma lipschitz_with_one_norm : lipschitz_with 1 (norm : α → ℝ) :=
by simpa only [dist_zero_left] using lipschitz_with.dist_right (0 : α)
lemma uniform_continuous_norm : uniform_continuous (norm : α → ℝ) :=
lipschitz_with_one_norm.uniform_continuous
lemma uniform_continuous_nnnorm : uniform_continuous (λ (a : α), ∥a∥₊) :=
uniform_continuous_subtype_mk uniform_continuous_norm _
section
variables {l : filter γ} {f : γ → α} {a : α}
lemma filter.tendsto.norm {a : α} (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : tendsto (λ x, ∥f x∥) l (𝓝 ∥a∥) :=
tendsto_norm.comp h
lemma filter.tendsto.nnnorm (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) l (𝓝 (∥a∥₊)) :=
tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm.continuous_at h
end
section
variables [topological_space γ] {f : γ → α} {s : set γ} {a : γ} {b : α}
lemma continuous.norm (h : continuous f) : continuous (λ x, ∥f x∥) := continuous_norm.comp h
lemma continuous.nnnorm (h : continuous f) : continuous (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) :=
continuous_nnnorm.comp h
lemma continuous_at.norm (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ∥f x∥) a := h.norm
lemma continuous_at.nnnorm (h : continuous_at f a) : continuous_at (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) a := h.nnnorm
lemma continuous_within_at.norm (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ∥f x∥) s a :=
h.norm
lemma continuous_within_at.nnnorm (h : continuous_within_at f s a) :
continuous_within_at (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) s a :=
h.nnnorm
lemma continuous_on.norm (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ∥f x∥) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).norm
lemma continuous_on.nnnorm (h : continuous_on f s) : continuous_on (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).nnnorm
end
/-- If `∥y∥→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any fixed `x`. -/
lemma eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top {l : filter γ} {f : γ → α}
(h : tendsto (λ y, ∥f y∥) l at_top) (x : α) :
∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
begin
have : ∀ᶠ y in l, 1 + ∥x∥ ≤ ∥f y∥ := h (mem_at_top (1 + ∥x∥)),
refine this.mono (λ y hy hxy, _),
subst x,
exact not_le_of_lt zero_lt_one (add_le_iff_nonpos_left.1 hy)
end
/-- A seminormed group is a uniform additive group, i.e., addition and subtraction are uniformly
continuous. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_uniform_group : uniform_add_group α :=
⟨(lipschitz_with.prod_fst.sub lipschitz_with.prod_snd).uniform_continuous⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_monoid : has_continuous_add α :=
by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_group : topological_add_group α :=
by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
lemma nat.norm_cast_le [has_one α] : ∀ n : ℕ, ∥(n : α)∥ ≤ n * ∥(1 : α)∥
| 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) := by { rw [n.cast_succ, n.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul],
exact norm_add_le_of_le (nat.norm_cast_le n) le_rfl }
lemma semi_normed_group.mem_closure_iff {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ y ∈ s, ∥x - y∥ < ε :=
by simp [metric.mem_closure_iff, dist_eq_norm]
lemma norm_le_zero_iff' [separated_space α] {g : α} :
∥g∥ ≤ 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
begin
have : g = 0 ↔ g ∈ closure ({0} : set α),
by simpa only [separated_space.out, mem_id_rel, sub_zero] using group_separation_rel g (0 : α),
rw [this, semi_normed_group.mem_closure_iff],
simp [forall_lt_iff_le']
end
lemma norm_eq_zero_iff' [separated_space α] {g : α} : ∥g∥ = 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
begin
conv_rhs { rw ← norm_le_zero_iff' },
split ; intro h,
{ rw h },
{ exact le_antisymm h (norm_nonneg g) }
end
lemma norm_pos_iff' [separated_space α] {g : α} : 0 < ∥g∥ ↔ g ≠ 0 :=
begin
rw lt_iff_le_and_ne,
simp only [norm_nonneg, true_and],
rw [ne_comm],
exact not_iff_not_of_iff (norm_eq_zero_iff'),
end
end semi_normed_group
section normed_group
/-- Construct a normed group from a translation invariant distance -/
def normed_group.of_add_dist [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist x y ≤ dist (x + z) (y + z)) : normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 },
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this }
end }
/-- A normed group can be built from a norm that satisfies algebraic properties. This is
formalised in this structure. -/
structure normed_group.core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α] : Prop :=
(norm_eq_zero_iff : ∀ x : α, ∥x∥ = 0 ↔ x = 0)
(triangle : ∀ x y : α, ∥x + y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + ∥y∥)
(norm_neg : ∀ x : α, ∥-x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- The `semi_normed_group.core` induced by a `normed_group.core`. -/
lemma normed_group.core.to_semi_normed_group.core {α : Type*} [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α]
(C : normed_group.core α) : semi_normed_group.core α :=
{ norm_zero := (C.norm_eq_zero_iff 0).2 rfl,
triangle := C.triangle,
norm_neg := C.norm_neg }
/-- Constructing a normed group from core properties of a norm, i.e., registering the distance and
the metric space structure from the norm properties. -/
noncomputable def normed_group.of_core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α]
(C : normed_group.core α) : normed_group α :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y h,
begin
rw [dist_eq_norm] at h,
exact sub_eq_zero.mp ((C.norm_eq_zero_iff _).1 h)
end
..semi_normed_group.of_core α (normed_group.core.to_semi_normed_group.core C) }
variables [normed_group α] [normed_group β]
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_zero {g : α} : ∥g∥ = 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
dist_zero_right g ▸ dist_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma norm_pos_iff {g : α} : 0 < ∥ g ∥ ↔ g ≠ 0 :=
dist_zero_right g ▸ dist_pos
@[simp] lemma norm_le_zero_iff {g : α} : ∥g∥ ≤ 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
by { rw [← dist_zero_right], exact dist_le_zero }
lemma eq_of_norm_sub_le_zero {g h : α} (a : ∥g - h∥ ≤ 0) : g = h :=
by rwa [← sub_eq_zero, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
lemma eq_of_norm_sub_eq_zero {u v : α} (h : ∥u - v∥ = 0) : u = v :=
begin
apply eq_of_dist_eq_zero,
rwa dist_eq_norm
end
lemma norm_sub_eq_zero_iff {u v : α} : ∥u - v∥ = 0 ↔ u = v :=
begin
convert dist_eq_zero,
rwa dist_eq_norm
end
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq_zero {a : α} : ∥a∥₊ = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, nnreal.coe_zero, coe_nnnorm, norm_eq_zero]
/-- A subgroup of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance add_subgroup.normed_group {E : Type*} [normed_group E] (s : add_subgroup E) :
normed_group s :=
{ ..add_subgroup.semi_normed_group s }
/-- A submodule of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance submodule.normed_group {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} (s : submodule 𝕜 E) : normed_group s :=
{ ..submodule.semi_normed_group s }
/-- normed group instance on the product of two normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_group : normed_group (α × β) := { ..prod.semi_normed_group }
lemma prod.norm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥ = (max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥) := rfl
lemma prod.nnnorm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥₊ = max (∥x.1∥₊) (∥x.2∥₊) :=
by { have := x.norm_def, simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at this, exact_mod_cast this }
lemma norm_fst_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.1∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_left _ _
lemma norm_snd_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.2∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_right _ _
lemma norm_prod_le_iff {x : α × β} {r : ℝ} :
∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∥x.1∥ ≤ r ∧ ∥x.2∥ ≤ r :=
max_le_iff
/-- normed group instance on the product of finitely many normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_group {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] :
normed_group (Πi, π i) := { ..pi.semi_normed_group }
/-- The norm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_norm_le_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r)
{x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ ≤ r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_le_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
/-- The norm of an element in a product space is `< r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_norm_lt_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r)
{x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ < r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ < r :=
by simp only [← dist_zero_right, dist_pi_lt_iff hr, pi.zero_apply]
lemma norm_le_pi_norm {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] (x : Πi, π i) (i : ι) :
∥x i∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
(pi_norm_le_iff (norm_nonneg x)).1 (le_refl _) i
@[simp] lemma pi_norm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) : ∥(λ i : ι, a)∥ = ∥a∥ :=
by simpa only [← dist_zero_right] using dist_pi_const a 0
@[simp] lemma pi_nnnorm_const [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] (a : α) :
∥(λ i : ι, a)∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ pi_norm_const a
lemma tendsto_norm_nhds_within_zero : tendsto (norm : α → ℝ) (𝓝[{0}ᶜ] 0) (𝓝[set.Ioi 0] 0) :=
(continuous_norm.tendsto' (0 : α) 0 norm_zero).inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $
λ x, norm_pos_iff.2
end normed_group
section semi_normed_ring
/-- A seminormed ring is a ring endowed with a seminorm which satisfies the inequality
`∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class semi_normed_ring (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, ring α, pseudo_metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) ≤ norm a * norm b)
/-- A normed ring is a ring endowed with a norm which satisfies the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_ring (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, ring α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) ≤ norm a * norm b)
/-- A normed ring is a seminormed ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring.to_semi_normed_ring [β : normed_ring α] : semi_normed_ring α :=
{ ..β }
/-- A seminormed commutative ring is a commutative ring endowed with a seminorm which satisfies
the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class semi_normed_comm_ring (α : Type*) extends semi_normed_ring α :=
(mul_comm : ∀ x y : α, x * y = y * x)
/-- A normed commutative ring is a commutative ring endowed with a norm which satisfies
the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_comm_ring (α : Type*) extends normed_ring α :=
(mul_comm : ∀ x y : α, x * y = y * x)
/-- A normed commutative ring is a seminormed commutative ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_comm_ring.to_semi_normed_comm_ring [β : normed_comm_ring α] :
semi_normed_comm_ring α := { ..β }
instance : normed_comm_ring punit :=
{ norm_mul := λ _ _, by simp,
..punit.normed_group,
..punit.comm_ring, }
/-- A mixin class with the axiom `∥1∥ = 1`. Many `normed_ring`s and all `normed_field`s satisfy this
axiom. -/
class norm_one_class (α : Type*) [has_norm α] [has_one α] : Prop :=
(norm_one : ∥(1:α)∥ = 1)
export norm_one_class (norm_one)
attribute [simp] norm_one
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_one [semi_normed_group α] [has_one α] [norm_one_class α] : ∥(1 : α)∥₊ = 1 :=
nnreal.eq norm_one
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_comm_ring.to_comm_ring [β : semi_normed_comm_ring α] : comm_ring α := { ..β }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring.to_normed_group [β : normed_ring α] : normed_group α := { ..β }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_ring.to_semi_normed_group [β : semi_normed_ring α] :
semi_normed_group α := { ..β }
instance prod.norm_one_class [normed_group α] [has_one α] [norm_one_class α]
[normed_group β] [has_one β] [norm_one_class β] :
norm_one_class (α × β) :=
⟨by simp [prod.norm_def]⟩
variables [semi_normed_ring α]
lemma norm_mul_le (a b : α) : (∥a*b∥) ≤ (∥a∥) * (∥b∥) :=
semi_normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
/-- A subalgebra of a seminormed ring is also a seminormed ring, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance subalgebra.semi_normed_ring {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : comm_ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_ring E] {_ : algebra 𝕜 E} (s : subalgebra 𝕜 E) : semi_normed_ring s :=
{ norm_mul := λ a b, norm_mul_le a.1 b.1,
..s.to_submodule.semi_normed_group }
/-- A subalgebra of a normed ring is also a normed ring, with the restriction of the norm.
See note [implicit instance arguments]. -/
instance subalgebra.normed_ring {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : comm_ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_ring E] {_ : algebra 𝕜 E} (s : subalgebra 𝕜 E) : normed_ring s :=
{ ..s.semi_normed_ring }
lemma list.norm_prod_le' : ∀ {l : list α}, l ≠ [] → ∥l.prod∥ ≤ (l.map norm).prod
| [] h := (h rfl).elim
| [a] _ := by simp
| (a :: b :: l) _ :=
begin
rw [list.map_cons, list.prod_cons, @list.prod_cons _ _ _ ∥a∥],
refine le_trans (norm_mul_le _ _) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _)),
exact list.norm_prod_le' (list.cons_ne_nil b l)
end
lemma list.norm_prod_le [norm_one_class α] : ∀ l : list α, ∥l.prod∥ ≤ (l.map norm).prod
| [] := by simp
| (a::l) := list.norm_prod_le' (list.cons_ne_nil a l)
lemma finset.norm_prod_le' {α : Type*} [normed_comm_ring α] (s : finset ι) (hs : s.nonempty)
(f : ι → α) :
∥∏ i in s, f i∥ ≤ ∏ i in s, ∥f i∥ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩,
have : l.map f ≠ [], by simpa using hs,
simpa using list.norm_prod_le' this
end
lemma finset.norm_prod_le {α : Type*} [normed_comm_ring α] [norm_one_class α] (s : finset ι)
(f : ι → α) :
∥∏ i in s, f i∥ ≤ ∏ i in s, ∥f i∥ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩,
simpa using (l.map f).norm_prod_le
end
/-- If `α` is a seminormed ring, then `∥a^n∥≤ ∥a∥^n` for `n > 0`. See also `norm_pow_le`. -/
lemma norm_pow_le' (a : α) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 1 h := by simp
| (n+2) h := by { rw [pow_succ _ (n+1), pow_succ _ (n+1)],
exact le_trans (norm_mul_le a (a^(n+1)))
(mul_le_mul (le_refl _)
(norm_pow_le' (nat.succ_pos _)) (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) }
/-- If `α` is a seminormed ring with `∥1∥=1`, then `∥a^n∥≤ ∥a∥^n`. See also `norm_pow_le'`. -/
lemma norm_pow_le [norm_one_class α] (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := norm_pow_le' a n.zero_lt_succ
lemma eventually_norm_pow_le (a : α) : ∀ᶠ (n:ℕ) in at_top, ∥a ^ n∥ ≤ ∥a∥ ^ n :=
eventually_at_top.mpr ⟨1, λ b h, norm_pow_le' a (nat.succ_le_iff.mp h)⟩
/-- In a seminormed ring, the left-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_left_bound (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_left x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
norm_mul_le x
/-- In a seminormed ring, the right-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_right_bound (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_right x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
λ y, by {rw mul_comm, convert norm_mul_le y x}
/-- Seminormed ring structure on the product of two seminormed rings, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.semi_normed_ring [semi_normed_ring β] : semi_normed_ring (α × β) :=
{ norm_mul := assume x y,
calc
∥x * y∥ = ∥(x.1*y.1, x.2*y.2)∥ : rfl
... = (max ∥x.1*y.1∥ ∥x.2*y.2∥) : rfl
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥x.2∥*∥y.2∥)) :
max_le_max (norm_mul_le (x.1) (y.1)) (norm_mul_le (x.2) (y.2))
... = (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥*∥x.2∥)) : by simp[mul_comm]
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.2∥) (∥y.1∥)) :
by apply max_mul_mul_le_max_mul_max; simp [norm_nonneg]
... = (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥)) : by simp [max_comm]
... = (∥x∥*∥y∥) : rfl,
..prod.semi_normed_group }
end semi_normed_ring
section normed_ring
variables [normed_ring α]
lemma units.norm_pos [nontrivial α] (x : units α) : 0 < ∥(x:α)∥ :=
norm_pos_iff.mpr (units.ne_zero x)
/-- Normed ring structure on the product of two normed rings, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_ring [normed_ring β] : normed_ring (α × β) :=
{ norm_mul := norm_mul_le,
..prod.semi_normed_group }
end normed_ring
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_ring_top_monoid [semi_normed_ring α] : has_continuous_mul α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
begin
have : ∀ e : α × α, ∥e.1 * e.2 - x.1 * x.2∥ ≤ ∥e.1∥ * ∥e.2 - x.2∥ + ∥e.1 - x.1∥ * ∥x.2∥,
{ intro e,
calc ∥e.1 * e.2 - x.1 * x.2∥ ≤ ∥e.1 * (e.2 - x.2) + (e.1 - x.1) * x.2∥ :
by rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel]
... ≤ ∥e.1∥ * ∥e.2 - x.2∥ + ∥e.1 - x.1∥ * ∥x.2∥ :
norm_add_le_of_le (norm_mul_le _ _) (norm_mul_le _ _) },
refine squeeze_zero (λ e, norm_nonneg _) this _,
convert ((continuous_fst.tendsto x).norm.mul ((continuous_snd.tendsto x).sub
tendsto_const_nhds).norm).add
(((continuous_fst.tendsto x).sub tendsto_const_nhds).norm.mul _),
show tendsto _ _ _, from tendsto_const_nhds,
simp
end ⟩
/-- A seminormed ring is a topological ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_top_ring [semi_normed_ring α] : topological_ring α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
have ∀ e : α, -e - -x = -(e - x), by intro; simp,
by simp only [this, norm_neg]; apply tendsto_norm_sub_self ⟩
/-- A normed field is a field with a norm satisfying ∥x y∥ = ∥x∥ ∥y∥. -/
class normed_field (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, field α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul' : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) = norm a * norm b)
/-- A nondiscrete normed field is a normed field in which there is an element of norm different from
`0` and `1`. This makes it possible to bring any element arbitrarily close to `0` by multiplication
by the powers of any element, and thus to relate algebra and topology. -/
class nondiscrete_normed_field (α : Type*) extends normed_field α :=
(non_trivial : ∃x:α, 1<∥x∥)
namespace normed_field
section normed_field
variables [normed_field α]
@[simp] lemma norm_mul (a b : α) : ∥a * b∥ = ∥a∥ * ∥b∥ :=
normed_field.norm_mul' a b
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance to_normed_comm_ring : normed_comm_ring α :=
{ norm_mul := λ a b, (norm_mul a b).le, ..‹normed_field α› }
@[priority 900]
instance to_norm_one_class : norm_one_class α :=
⟨mul_left_cancel' (mt norm_eq_zero.1 (@one_ne_zero α _ _)) $
by rw [← norm_mul, mul_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_mul (a b : α) : ∥a * b∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ * ∥b∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_mul a b
/-- `norm` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps] def norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ := ⟨norm, norm_zero, norm_one, norm_mul⟩
/-- `nnnorm` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps] def nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0 :=
⟨nnnorm, nnnorm_zero, nnnorm_one, nnnorm_mul⟩
@[simp] lemma norm_pow (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a ^ n∥ = ∥a∥ ^ n :=
(norm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ).map_pow a
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ∥a ^ n∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ ^ n :=
(nnnorm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ≥0).map_pow a n
@[simp] lemma norm_prod (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∥∏ b in s, f b∥ = ∏ b in s, ∥f b∥ :=
(norm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ).map_prod f s
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_prod (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∥∏ b in s, f b∥₊ = ∏ b in s, ∥f b∥₊ :=
(nnnorm_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* ℝ≥0).map_prod f s
@[simp] lemma norm_div (a b : α) : ∥a / b∥ = ∥a∥ / ∥b∥ :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_div a b
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_div (a b : α) : ∥a / b∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ / ∥b∥₊ :=
(nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0).map_div a b
@[simp] lemma norm_inv (a : α) : ∥a⁻¹∥ = ∥a∥⁻¹ :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_inv' a
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_inv (a : α) : ∥a⁻¹∥₊ = ∥a∥₊⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_fpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ∥a^n∥ = ∥a∥^n :=
(norm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ).map_fpow
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_fpow : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℤ), ∥a ^ n∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ ^ n :=
(nnnorm_hom : monoid_with_zero_hom α ℝ≥0).map_fpow
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance : has_continuous_inv' α :=
begin
refine ⟨λ r r0, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 _⟩,
have r0' : 0 < ∥r∥ := norm_pos_iff.2 r0,
rcases exists_between r0' with ⟨ε, ε0, εr⟩,
have : ∀ᶠ e in 𝓝 r, ∥e⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ ≤ ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ε,
{ filter_upwards [(is_open_lt continuous_const continuous_norm).eventually_mem εr],
intros e he,
have e0 : e ≠ 0 := norm_pos_iff.1 (ε0.trans he),
calc ∥e⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ = ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ∥e∥ : by field_simp [mul_comm]
... ≤ ∥r - e∥ / ∥r∥ / ε :
div_le_div_of_le_left (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) ε0 he.le },
refine squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall $ λ _, norm_nonneg _) this _,
refine (continuous_const.sub continuous_id).norm.div_const.div_const.tendsto' _ _ _,
simp
end
end normed_field
variables (α) [nondiscrete_normed_field α]
lemma exists_one_lt_norm : ∃x : α, 1 < ∥x∥ := ‹nondiscrete_normed_field α›.non_trivial
lemma exists_norm_lt_one : ∃x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < 1 :=
begin
rcases exists_one_lt_norm α with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine ⟨y⁻¹, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [inv_eq_zero, ne.def, norm_pos_iff],
rintro rfl,
rw norm_zero at hy,
exact lt_asymm zero_lt_one hy },
{ simp [inv_lt_one hy] }
end
lemma exists_lt_norm (r : ℝ) : ∃ x : α, r < ∥x∥ :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := pow_unbounded_of_one_lt r hw in
⟨w^n, by rwa norm_pow⟩
lemma exists_norm_lt {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : ∃ x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < r :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hle, hlt⟩ := exists_int_pow_near' hr hw in
⟨w^n, by { rw norm_fpow; exact fpow_pos_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hw) _},
by rwa norm_fpow⟩
variable {α}
@[instance]
lemma punctured_nhds_ne_bot (x : α) : ne_bot (𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x) :=
begin
rw [← mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot, metric.mem_closure_iff],
rintros ε ε0,
rcases normed_field.exists_norm_lt α ε0 with ⟨b, hb0, hbε⟩,
refine ⟨x + b, mt (set.mem_singleton_iff.trans add_right_eq_self).1 $ norm_pos_iff.1 hb0, _⟩,
rwa [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel'],
end
@[instance]
lemma nhds_within_is_unit_ne_bot : ne_bot (𝓝[{x : α | is_unit x}] 0) :=
by simpa only [is_unit_iff_ne_zero] using punctured_nhds_ne_bot (0:α)
end normed_field
instance : normed_field ℝ :=
{ norm_mul' := abs_mul,
.. real.normed_group }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℝ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
namespace real
lemma norm_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∥x∥ = x :=
abs_of_nonneg hx
@[simp] lemma norm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℝ)∥ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℝ)∥₊ = n := nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_two : ∥(2 : ℝ)∥ = 2 := abs_of_pos (@zero_lt_two ℝ _ _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_two : ∥(2 : ℝ)∥₊ = 2 := nnreal.eq $ by simp
lemma nnnorm_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∥x∥₊ = ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_of_nonneg hx
lemma ennnorm_eq_of_real {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (∥x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ennreal.of_real x :=
by { rw [← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, norm_of_nonneg hx] }
end real
namespace nnreal
open_locale nnreal
@[simp] lemma norm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : ∥(x : ℝ)∥ = x :=
by rw [real.norm_eq_abs, x.abs_eq]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : ∥(x : ℝ)∥₊ = x :=
nnreal.eq $ real.norm_of_nonneg x.2
end nnreal
@[simp] lemma norm_norm [semi_normed_group α] (x : α) : ∥∥x∥∥ = ∥x∥ :=
real.norm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_norm [semi_normed_group α] (a : α) : ∥∥a∥∥₊ = ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa [real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a)]
/-- A restatement of `metric_space.tendsto_at_top` in terms of the norm. -/
lemma normed_group.tendsto_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {β : Type*} [semi_normed_group β]
{f : α → β} {b : β} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → ∥f n - b∥ < ε :=
(at_top_basis.tendsto_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).trans (by simp [dist_eq_norm])
/--
A variant of `normed_group.tendsto_at_top` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
lemma normed_group.tendsto_at_top' [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [no_top_order α]
{β : Type*} [semi_normed_group β]
{f : α → β} {b : β} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N < n → ∥f n - b∥ < ε :=
(at_top_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff metric.nhds_basis_ball).trans (by simp [dist_eq_norm])
instance : normed_comm_ring ℤ :=
{ norm := λ n, ∥(n : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul := λ m n, le_of_eq $ by simp only [norm, int.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ m n, by simp only [int.dist_eq, norm, int.cast_sub],
mul_comm := mul_comm }
@[norm_cast] lemma int.norm_cast_real (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℝ)∥ = ∥m∥ := rfl
lemma int.norm_eq_abs (n : ℤ) : ∥n∥ = abs n := rfl
lemma nnreal.coe_nat_abs (n : ℤ) : (n.nat_abs : ℝ≥0) = ∥n∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ calc ((n.nat_abs : ℝ≥0) : ℝ)
= (n.nat_abs : ℤ) : by simp only [int.cast_coe_nat, nnreal.coe_nat_cast]
... = abs n : by simp only [← int.abs_eq_nat_abs, int.cast_abs]
... = ∥n∥ : rfl
instance : norm_one_class ℤ :=
⟨by simp [← int.norm_cast_real]⟩
instance : normed_field ℚ :=
{ norm := λ r, ∥(r : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul' := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [norm, rat.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [rat.dist_eq, norm, rat.cast_sub] }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℚ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma rat.norm_cast_real (r : ℚ) : ∥(r : ℝ)∥ = ∥r∥ := rfl
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma int.norm_cast_rat (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℚ)∥ = ∥m∥ :=
by rw [← rat.norm_cast_real, ← int.norm_cast_real]; congr' 1; norm_cast
-- Now that we've installed the norm on `ℤ`,
-- we can state some lemmas about `nsmul` and `gsmul`.
section
variables [semi_normed_group α]
lemma norm_nsmul_le (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥ ≤ n * ∥a∥ :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ simp only [norm_zero, nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul] },
simp only [nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_smul, add_mul, one_mul, nat.cast_add,
nat.cast_one, one_nsmul],
exact norm_add_le_of_le ih le_rfl
end
lemma norm_gsmul_le (n : ℤ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥ ≤ ∥n∥ * ∥a∥ :=
begin
induction n with n n,
{ simp only [int.of_nat_eq_coe, gsmul_coe_nat],
convert norm_nsmul_le n a,
exact nat.abs_cast n },
{ simp only [int.neg_succ_of_nat_coe, neg_smul, norm_neg, gsmul_coe_nat],
convert norm_nsmul_le n.succ a,
exact nat.abs_cast n.succ, }
end
lemma nnnorm_nsmul_le (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥₊ ≤ n * ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa only [←nnreal.coe_le_coe, nnreal.coe_mul, nnreal.coe_nat_cast]
using norm_nsmul_le n a
lemma nnnorm_gsmul_le (n : ℤ) (a : α) : ∥n • a∥₊ ≤ ∥n∥₊ * ∥a∥₊ :=
by simpa only [←nnreal.coe_le_coe, nnreal.coe_mul] using norm_gsmul_le n a
end
section semi_normed_space
section prio
set_option extends_priority 920
-- Here, we set a rather high priority for the instance `[semi_normed_space α β] : module α β`
-- to take precedence over `semiring.to_module` as this leads to instance paths with better
-- unification properties.
/-- A seminormed space over a normed field is a vector space endowed with a seminorm which satisfies
the equality `∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥`. We require only `∥c • x∥ ≤ ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in the definition, then prove
`∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in `norm_smul`. -/
class semi_normed_space (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [normed_field α] [semi_normed_group β]
extends module α β :=
(norm_smul_le : ∀ (a:α) (b:β), ∥a • b∥ ≤ ∥a∥ * ∥b∥)
set_option extends_priority 920
-- Here, we set a rather high priority for the instance `[normed_space α β] : module α β`
-- to take precedence over `semiring.to_module` as this leads to instance paths with better
-- unification properties.
/-- A normed space over a normed field is a vector space endowed with a norm which satisfies the
equality `∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥`. We require only `∥c • x∥ ≤ ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in the definition, then prove
`∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in `norm_smul`. -/
class normed_space (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [normed_field α] [normed_group β]
extends module α β :=
(norm_smul_le : ∀ (a:α) (b:β), ∥a • b∥ ≤ ∥a∥ * ∥b∥)
/-- A normed space is a seminormed space. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_space.to_semi_normed_space [normed_field α] [normed_group β]
[γ : normed_space α β] : semi_normed_space α β := { ..γ }
end prio
variables [normed_field α] [semi_normed_group β]
instance normed_field.to_normed_space : normed_space α α :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a b, le_of_eq (normed_field.norm_mul a b) }
lemma norm_smul [semi_normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : ∥s • x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ :=
begin
by_cases h : s = 0,
{ simp [h] },
{ refine le_antisymm (semi_normed_space.norm_smul_le s x) _,
calc ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥s⁻¹ • s • x∥ : by rw [inv_smul_smul' h]
... ≤ ∥s∥ * (∥s⁻¹∥ * ∥s • x∥) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (semi_normed_space.norm_smul_le _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = ∥s • x∥ :
by rw [normed_field.norm_inv, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel (mt norm_eq_zero.1 h), one_mul] }
end
@[simp] lemma abs_norm_eq_norm (z : β) : abs ∥z∥ = ∥z∥ :=
(abs_eq (norm_nonneg z)).mpr (or.inl rfl)
lemma dist_smul [semi_normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) : dist (s • x) (s • y) = ∥s∥ * dist x y :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, (norm_smul _ _).symm, smul_sub]
lemma nnnorm_smul [semi_normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : ∥s • x∥₊ = ∥s∥₊ * ∥x∥₊ :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_smul s x
lemma nndist_smul [semi_normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) :
nndist (s • x) (s • y) = ∥s∥₊ * nndist x y :=
nnreal.eq $ dist_smul s x y
lemma norm_smul_of_nonneg [semi_normed_space ℝ β] {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 ≤ t) (x : β) :
∥t • x∥ = t * ∥x∥ := by rw [norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ht]
variables {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] [semi_normed_space α E]
variables {F : Type*} [semi_normed_group F] [semi_normed_space α F]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semi_normed_space.has_continuous_smul : has_continuous_smul α E :=
begin
refine { continuous_smul := continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $
λ p, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 _ },
refine squeeze_zero (λ _, norm_nonneg _) _ _,
{ exact λ q, ∥q.1 - p.1∥ * ∥q.2∥ + ∥p.1∥ * ∥q.2 - p.2∥ },
{ intro q,
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel, ← norm_smul, ← norm_smul, smul_sub, sub_smul],
exact norm_add_le _ _ },
{ conv { congr, skip, skip, congr, rw [← zero_add (0:ℝ)], congr,
rw [← zero_mul ∥p.2∥], skip, rw [← mul_zero ∥p.1∥] },
exact ((tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_fst.tendsto p)).mul
(continuous_snd.tendsto p).norm).add
(tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_snd.tendsto p))) }
end
theorem eventually_nhds_norm_smul_sub_lt (c : α) (x : E) {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, ∥c • (y - x)∥ < ε :=
have tendsto (λ y, ∥c • (y - x)∥) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0),
from (continuous_const.smul (continuous_id.sub continuous_const)).norm.tendsto' _ _ (by simp),
this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds h)
theorem closure_ball [semi_normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
closure (ball x r) = closed_ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm closure_ball_subset_closed_ball (λ y hy, _),
have : continuous_within_at (λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x) (set.Ico 0 1) 1 :=
((continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const).continuous_within_at,
convert this.mem_closure _ _,
{ rw [one_smul, sub_add_cancel] },
{ simp [closure_Ico (@zero_lt_one ℝ _ _), zero_le_one] },
{ rintros c ⟨hc0, hc1⟩,
rw [set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg hc0, mul_comm, ← mul_one r],
rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hy,
apply mul_lt_mul'; assumption }
end
theorem frontier_ball [semi_normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (ball x r) = sphere x r :=
begin
rw [frontier, closure_ball x hr, is_open_ball.interior_eq],
ext x, exact (@eq_iff_le_not_lt ℝ _ _ _).symm
end
theorem interior_closed_ball [semi_normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm _ ball_subset_interior_closed_ball,
intros y hy,
rcases le_iff_lt_or_eq.1 (mem_closed_ball.1 $ interior_subset hy) with hr|rfl, { exact hr },
set f : ℝ → E := λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x,
suffices : f ⁻¹' closed_ball x (dist y x) ⊆ set.Icc (-1) 1,
{ have hfc : continuous f := (continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const,
have hf1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ f ⁻¹' (interior (closed_ball x $ dist y x)), by simpa [f],
have h1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ interior (set.Icc (-1:ℝ) 1) :=
interior_mono this (preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hfc hf1),
contrapose h1,
simp },
intros c hc,
rw [set.mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_le_mul_right hr],
simpa [f, dist_eq_norm, norm_smul] using hc
end
theorem frontier_closed_ball [semi_normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball x hr,
closed_ball_diff_ball]
variables (α)
lemma ne_neg_of_mem_sphere [char_zero α] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : sphere (0:E) r) : x ≠ - x :=
λ h, nonzero_of_mem_sphere hr x (eq_zero_of_eq_neg α (by { conv_lhs {rw h}, simp }))
lemma ne_neg_of_mem_unit_sphere [char_zero α] (x : sphere (0:E) 1) : x ≠ - x :=
ne_neg_of_mem_sphere α (by norm_num) x
variables {α}
open normed_field
/-- The product of two seminormed spaces is a seminormed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance prod.semi_normed_space : semi_normed_space α (E × F) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, le_of_eq $ by simp [prod.semi_norm_def, norm_smul, mul_max_of_nonneg],
..prod.normed_group,
..prod.module }
/-- The product of finitely many seminormed spaces is a seminormed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance pi.semi_normed_space {E : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, semi_normed_group (E i)]
[∀i, semi_normed_space α (E i)] : semi_normed_space α (Πi, E i) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a f, le_of_eq $
show (↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), ∥a • f b∥₊)) : ℝ) =
∥a∥₊ * ↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), ∥f b∥₊)),
by simp only [(nnreal.coe_mul _ _).symm, nnreal.mul_finset_sup, nnnorm_smul] }
/-- A subspace of a seminormed space is also a normed space, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance submodule.semi_normed_space {𝕜 R : Type*} [has_scalar 𝕜 R] [normed_field 𝕜] [ring R]
{E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] [semi_normed_space 𝕜 E] [module R E]
[is_scalar_tower 𝕜 R E] (s : submodule R E) :
semi_normed_space 𝕜 s :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ norm_smul c (x : E) }
/-- If there is a scalar `c` with `∥c∥>1`, then any element of with norm different from `0` can be
moved by scalar multiplication to any shell of width `∥c∥`. Also recap information on the norm of
the rescaling element that shows up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell_semi_normed {c : α} (hc : 1 < ∥c∥) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E}
(hx : ∥x∥ ≠ 0) : ∃d:α, d ≠ 0 ∧ ∥d • x∥ < ε ∧ (ε/∥c∥ ≤ ∥d • x∥) ∧ (∥d∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥) :=
begin
have xεpos : 0 < ∥x∥/ε := div_pos ((ne.symm hx).le_iff_lt.1 (norm_nonneg x)) εpos,
rcases exists_int_pow_near xεpos hc with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have cpos : 0 < ∥c∥ := lt_trans (zero_lt_one : (0 :ℝ) < 1) hc,
have cnpos : 0 < ∥c^(n+1)∥ := by { rw norm_fpow, exact lt_trans xεpos hn.2 },
refine ⟨(c^(n+1))⁻¹, _, _, _, _⟩,
show (c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ ≠ 0,
by rwa [ne.def, inv_eq_zero, ← ne.def, ← norm_pos_iff],
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥ < ε,
{ rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff cnpos, mul_comm, norm_fpow],
exact (div_lt_iff εpos).1 (hn.2) },
show ε / ∥c∥ ≤ ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥,
{ rw [div_le_iff cpos, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_fpow, fpow_add (ne_of_gt cpos),
gpow_one, mul_inv_rev', mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt cpos),
one_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff (fpow_pos_of_pos cpos _), mul_comm],
exact (le_div_iff εpos).1 hn.1 },
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
{ have : ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥ = ε⁻¹ * ∥x∥ * ∥c∥, by ring,
rw [norm_inv, inv_inv', norm_fpow, fpow_add (ne_of_gt cpos), gpow_one, this, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hn.1 (norm_nonneg _) }
end
end semi_normed_space
section normed_space
variables [normed_field α]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space α E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space α F]
open normed_field
theorem interior_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with hr|rfl|hr,
{ simp [closed_ball_eq_empty_iff_neg.2 hr, ball_eq_empty_iff_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt hr)] },
{ suffices : x ∉ interior {x},
{ rw [ball_zero, closed_ball_zero, ← set.subset_empty_iff],
intros y hy,
obtain rfl : y = x := set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (interior_subset hy),
exact this hy },
rw [← set.mem_compl_iff, ← closure_compl],
rcases exists_ne (0 : E) with ⟨z, hz⟩,
suffices : (λ c : ℝ, x + c • z) 0 ∈ closure ({x}ᶜ : set E),
by simpa only [zero_smul, add_zero] using this,
have : (0:ℝ) ∈ closure (set.Ioi (0:ℝ)), by simp [closure_Ioi],
refine (continuous_const.add (continuous_id.smul
continuous_const)).continuous_within_at.mem_closure this _,
intros c hc,
simp [smul_eq_zero, hz, ne_of_gt hc] },
{ exact interior_closed_ball x hr }
end
theorem frontier_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball' x r, closed_ball_diff_ball]
variables {α}
/-- If there is a scalar `c` with `∥c∥>1`, then any element can be moved by scalar multiplication to
any shell of width `∥c∥`. Also recap information on the norm of the rescaling element that shows
up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell {c : α} (hc : 1 < ∥c∥) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃d:α, d ≠ 0 ∧ ∥d • x∥ < ε ∧ (ε/∥c∥ ≤ ∥d • x∥) ∧ (∥d∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥) :=
rescale_to_shell_semi_normed hc εpos (ne_of_lt (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)).symm
/-- The product of two normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance : normed_space α (E × F) := { ..prod.semi_normed_space }
/-- The product of finitely many normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_space {E : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (E i)]
[∀i, normed_space α (E i)] : normed_space α (Πi, E i) :=
{ ..pi.semi_normed_space }
/-- A subspace of a normed space is also a normed space, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance submodule.normed_space {𝕜 R : Type*} [has_scalar 𝕜 R] [normed_field 𝕜] [ring R]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [module R E]
[is_scalar_tower 𝕜 R E] (s : submodule R E) :
normed_space 𝕜 s :=
{ ..submodule.semi_normed_space s }
end normed_space
section normed_algebra
/-- A seminormed algebra `𝕜'` over `𝕜` is an algebra endowed with a seminorm for which the
embedding of `𝕜` in `𝕜'` is an isometry. -/
class semi_normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
extends algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
(norm_algebra_map_eq : ∀x:𝕜, ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- A normed algebra `𝕜'` over `𝕜` is an algebra endowed with a norm for which the embedding of
`𝕜` in `𝕜'` is an isometry. -/
class normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_ring 𝕜']
extends algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
(norm_algebra_map_eq : ∀x:𝕜, ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- A normed algebra is a seminormed algebra. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_algebra.to_semi_normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
[normed_ring 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := normed_algebra.norm_algebra_map_eq }
@[simp] lemma norm_algebra_map_eq {𝕜 : Type*} (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
[h : semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] (x : 𝕜) : ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
semi_normed_algebra.norm_algebra_map_eq _
/-- In a normed algebra, the inclusion of the base field in the extended field is an isometry. -/
lemma algebra_map_isometry (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
[semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : isometry (algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜') :=
begin
refine isometry_emetric_iff_metric.2 (λx y, _),
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm, ← ring_hom.map_sub, norm_algebra_map_eq],
end
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
variables (𝕜' : Type*) [semi_normed_ring 𝕜']
@[priority 100]
instance semi_normed_algebra.to_semi_normed_space [h : semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] :
semi_normed_space 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, calc
∥s • x∥ = ∥((algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜') s) * x∥ : by { rw h.smul_def', refl }
... ≤ ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' s∥ * ∥x∥ : semi_normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
... = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ : by rw norm_algebra_map_eq,
..h }
@[priority 100]
instance normed_algebra.to_normed_space (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] (𝕜' : Type*)
[normed_ring 𝕜'] [h : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : normed_space 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_smul_le := semi_normed_space.norm_smul_le,
..h }
instance normed_algebra.id : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜 :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := by simp,
.. algebra.id 𝕜}
variables (𝕜') [semi_normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
include 𝕜
lemma normed_algebra.norm_one : ∥(1:𝕜')∥ = 1 :=
by simpa using (norm_algebra_map_eq 𝕜' (1:𝕜))
lemma normed_algebra.norm_one_class : norm_one_class 𝕜' :=
⟨normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜 𝕜'⟩
lemma normed_algebra.zero_ne_one : (0:𝕜') ≠ 1 :=
begin
refine (ne_zero_of_norm_pos _).symm,
rw normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜 𝕜', norm_num,
end
lemma normed_algebra.nontrivial : nontrivial 𝕜' :=
⟨⟨0, 1, normed_algebra.zero_ne_one 𝕜 𝕜'⟩⟩
end normed_algebra
section restrict_scalars
variables (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
(E : Type*) [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜' E]
(F : Type*) [semi_normed_group F] [semi_normed_space 𝕜' F]
/-- Warning: This declaration should be used judiciously.
Please consider using `is_scalar_tower` instead.
`𝕜`-seminormed space structure induced by a `𝕜'`-seminormed space structure when `𝕜'` is a
seminormed algebra over `𝕜`. Not registered as an instance as `𝕜'` can not be inferred.
The type synonym `module.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E` will be endowed with this instance by default.
-/
def semi_normed_space.restrict_scalars : semi_normed_space 𝕜 F :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ begin
change ∥(algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' c) • x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
simp [norm_smul]
end,
..restrict_scalars.module 𝕜 𝕜' F }
/-- Warning: This declaration should be used judiciously.
Please consider using `is_scalar_tower` instead.
`𝕜`-normed space structure induced by a `𝕜'`-normed space structure when `𝕜'` is a
normed algebra over `𝕜`. Not registered as an instance as `𝕜'` can not be inferred.
The type synonym `module.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E` will be endowed with this instance by default.
-/
def normed_space.restrict_scalars : normed_space 𝕜 E :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ begin
change ∥(algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' c) • x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
simp [norm_smul]
end,
..restrict_scalars.module 𝕜 𝕜' E }
instance {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {F : Type*} [I : semi_normed_group F] :
semi_normed_group (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) := I
instance {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*} [I : normed_group E] :
normed_group (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance module.restrict_scalars.semi_normed_space_orig {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {F : Type*}
[normed_field 𝕜'] [semi_normed_group F] [I : semi_normed_space 𝕜' F] :
semi_normed_space 𝕜' (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) := I
instance module.restrict_scalars.normed_space_orig {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*}
[normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_group E] [I : normed_space 𝕜' E] :
normed_space 𝕜' (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance : semi_normed_space 𝕜 (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F) :=
(semi_normed_space.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' F : semi_normed_space 𝕜 F)
instance : normed_space 𝕜 (restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) :=
(normed_space.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E : normed_space 𝕜 E)
end restrict_scalars
section summable
open_locale classical
open finset filter
variables [semi_normed_group α] [semi_normed_group β]
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm {f : ι → α} :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ i in s, f i) ↔
∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃s:finset ι, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∥ ∑ i in t, f i ∥ < ε :=
begin
rw [cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing, nhds_basis_ball.forall_iff],
{ simp only [ball_0_eq, set.mem_set_of_eq] },
{ rintros s t hst ⟨s', hs'⟩,
exact ⟨s', λ t' ht', hst $ hs' _ ht'⟩ }
end
lemma summable_iff_vanishing_norm [complete_space α] {f : ι → α} :
summable f ↔ ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃s:finset ι, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∥ ∑ i in t, f i ∥ < ε :=
by rw [summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm]
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) : cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ i in s, f i) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm.2 $ assume ε hε,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := summable_iff_vanishing_norm.1 hg ε hε in
⟨s, assume t ht,
have ∥∑ i in t, g i∥ < ε := hs t ht,
have nn : 0 ≤ ∑ i in t, g i := finset.sum_nonneg (assume a _, le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h a)),
lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_sum_le_of_le t (λ i _, h i)) $
by rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg nn] at this⟩
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥)) :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ a in s, f a) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
/-- If a function `f` is summable in norm, and along some sequence of finsets exhausting the space
its sum is converging to a limit `a`, then this holds along all finsets, i.e., `f` is summable
with sum `a`. -/
lemma has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥))
{s : γ → finset ι} {p : filter γ} [ne_bot p]
(hs : tendsto s p at_top) {a : α} (ha : tendsto (λ b, ∑ i in s b, f i) p (𝓝 a)) :
has_sum f a :=
tendsto_nhds_of_cauchy_seq_of_subseq (cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm hf) hs ha
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm {f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : summable (λi, ∥f i∥)) :
has_sum f a ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, ∑ i in range n, f i) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
⟨λ h, h.tendsto_sum_nat,
λ h, has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable hf tendsto_finset_range h⟩
/-- The direct comparison test for series: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `g`
which is summable, then `f` is summable. -/
lemma summable_of_norm_bounded
[complete_space α] {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g) (h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
summable f :=
by { rw summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, exact cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded g hg h }
lemma has_sum.norm_le_of_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : α} {b : ℝ}
(hf : has_sum f a) (hg : has_sum g b) (h : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
∥a∥ ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hf.norm hg $ λ s, norm_sum_le_of_le _ $ λ i hi, h i
/-- Quantitative result associated to the direct comparison test for series: If `∑' i, g i` is
summable, and for all `i`, `∥f i∥ ≤ g i`, then `∥∑' i, f i∥ ≤ ∑' i, g i`. Note that we do not
assume that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete space. -/
lemma tsum_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (hg : has_sum g a)
(h : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
∥∑' i : ι, f i∥ ≤ a :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ exact hf.has_sum.norm_le_of_bounded hg h },
{ rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf, norm_zero],
exact ge_of_tendsto' hg (λ s, sum_nonneg $ λ i hi, (norm_nonneg _).trans (h i)) }
end
/-- If `∑' i, ∥f i∥` is summable, then `∥∑' i, f i∥ ≤ (∑' i, ∥f i∥)`. Note that we do not assume
that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete space. -/
lemma norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λi, ∥f i∥)) :
∥∑' i, f i∥ ≤ ∑' i, ∥f i∥ :=
tsum_of_norm_bounded hf.has_sum $ λ i, le_rfl
/-- Quantitative result associated to the direct comparison test for series: If `∑' i, g i` is
summable, and for all `i`, `nnnorm (f i) ≤ g i`, then `nnnorm (∑' i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, g i`. Note that we
do not assume that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete
space. -/
lemma tsum_of_nnnorm_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} (hg : has_sum g a)
(h : ∀ i, nnnorm (f i) ≤ g i) :
nnnorm (∑' i : ι, f i) ≤ a :=
begin
simp only [← nnreal.coe_le_coe, ← nnreal.has_sum_coe, coe_nnnorm] at *,
exact tsum_of_norm_bounded hg h
end
/-- If `∑' i, nnnorm (f i)` is summable, then `nnnorm (∑' i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, nnnorm (f i)`. Note that
we do not assume that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete
space. -/
lemma nnnorm_tsum_le {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λi, nnnorm (f i))) :
nnnorm (∑' i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, nnnorm (f i) :=
tsum_of_nnnorm_bounded hf.has_sum (λ i, le_rfl)
variable [complete_space α]
/-- Variant of the direct comparison test for series: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `g` which is summable, then `f` is summable. -/
lemma summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) : summable f :=
begin
replace h := mem_cofinite.1 h,
refine h.summable_compl_iff.mp _,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded _ (h.summable_compl_iff.mpr hg) _,
rintros ⟨a, h'⟩,
simpa using h'
end
lemma summable_of_nnnorm_bounded {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ≥0) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀i, ∥f i∥₊ ≤ g i) : summable f :=
summable_of_norm_bounded (λ i, (g i : ℝ)) (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hg) (λ i, by exact_mod_cast h i)
lemma summable_of_summable_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥)) : summable f :=
summable_of_norm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
lemma summable_of_summable_nnnorm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λ a, ∥f a∥₊)) : summable f :=
summable_of_nnnorm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
end summable
namespace uniform_space
namespace completion
variables (V : Type*)
instance [uniform_space V] [has_norm V] :
has_norm (completion V) :=
{ norm := completion.extension has_norm.norm }
@[simp] lemma norm_coe {V} [semi_normed_group V] (v : V) :
∥(v : completion V)∥ = ∥v∥ :=
completion.extension_coe uniform_continuous_norm v
instance [semi_normed_group V] : normed_group (completion V) :=
{ dist_eq :=
begin
intros x y,
apply completion.induction_on₂ x y; clear x y,
{ refine is_closed_eq (completion.uniform_continuous_extension₂ _).continuous _,
exact continuous.comp completion.continuous_extension continuous_sub },
{ intros x y,
rw [← completion.coe_sub, norm_coe, metric.completion.dist_eq, dist_eq_norm] }
end,
.. (show add_comm_group (completion V), by apply_instance),
.. (show metric_space (completion V), by apply_instance) }
end completion
end uniform_space
|
14084bffa8a6244b904ddb458fee5da8c2fdd072 | 9dd3f3912f7321eb58ee9aa8f21778ad6221f87c | /tests/lean/coe6.lean | 8f159ea898a459377286ec887b44f62021f5651a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bre7k30/lean | de893411bcfa7b3c5572e61b9e1c52951b310aa4 | 5a924699d076dab1bd5af23a8f910b433e598d7a | refs/heads/master | 1,610,900,145,817 | 1,488,006,845,000 | 1,488,006,845,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 321 | lean | universe variables u
structure Group :=
(carrier : Type u) (mul : carrier → carrier → carrier) (one : carrier)
attribute [instance]
definition Group_to_Type : has_coe_to_sort Group :=
{ S := Type u, coe := λ g, g~>carrier }
constant g : Group.{1}
set_option pp.binder_types true
check λ a b : g, Group.mul g a b
|
c41ebcb6ff30efd8f4f73698418c5c70a16d3aec | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/number_theory/legendre_symbol/basic.lean | 4427fe06ad80030b5a74534ce929bf11cf5b85b2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,753 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import number_theory.legendre_symbol.quadratic_char.basic
/-!
# Legendre symbol
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file contains results about Legendre symbols.
We define the Legendre symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$ as `legendre_sym p a`.
Note the order of arguments! The advantage of this form is that then `legendre_sym p`
is a multiplicative map.
The Legendre symbol is used to define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobi_sym a b`, for integers `a`
and (odd) natural numbers `b`, which extends the Legendre symbol.
## Main results
We also prove the supplementary laws that give conditions for when `-1`
is a square modulo a prime `p`:
`legendre_sym.at_neg_one` and `zmod.exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff` for `-1`.
See `number_theory.legendre_symbol.quadratic_reciprocity` for the conditions when `2` and `-2`
are squares:
`legendre_sym.at_two` and `zmod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff` for `2`,
`legendre_sym.at_neg_two` and `zmod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff` for `-2`.
## Tags
quadratic residue, quadratic nonresidue, Legendre symbol
-/
open nat
section euler
namespace zmod
variables (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime]
/-- Euler's Criterion: A unit `x` of `zmod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
lemma euler_criterion_units (x : (zmod p)ˣ) : (∃ y : (zmod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ x ^ (p / 2) = 1 :=
begin
by_cases hc : p = 2,
{ substI hc,
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const], },
{ have h₀ := finite_field.unit_is_square_iff (by rwa ring_char_zmod_n) x,
have hs : (∃ y : (zmod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ is_square(x) :=
by { rw is_square_iff_exists_sq x,
simp_rw eq_comm, },
rw hs,
rwa card p at h₀, },
end
/-- Euler's Criterion: a nonzero `a : zmod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
lemma euler_criterion {a : zmod p} (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_square (a : zmod p) ↔ a ^ (p / 2) = 1 :=
begin
apply (iff_congr _ (by simp [units.ext_iff])).mp (euler_criterion_units p (units.mk0 a ha)),
simp only [units.ext_iff, sq, units.coe_mk0, units.coe_mul],
split, { rintro ⟨y, hy⟩, exact ⟨y, hy.symm⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩,
have hy : y ≠ 0, { rintro rfl, simpa [zero_pow] using ha, },
refine ⟨units.mk0 y hy, _⟩, simp, }
end
/-- If `a : zmod p` is nonzero, then `a^(p/2)` is either `1` or `-1`. -/
lemma pow_div_two_eq_neg_one_or_one {a : zmod p} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a ^ (p / 2) = 1 ∨ a ^ (p / 2) = -1 :=
begin
cases prime.eq_two_or_odd (fact.out p.prime) with hp2 hp_odd,
{ substI p, revert a ha, dec_trivial },
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← pow_add, ← two_mul, two_mul_odd_div_two hp_odd],
exact pow_card_sub_one_eq_one ha
end
end zmod
end euler
section legendre
/-!
### Definition of the Legendre symbol and basic properties
-/
open zmod
variables (p : ℕ) [fact p.prime]
/-- The Legendre symbol of `a : ℤ` and a prime `p`, `legendre_sym p a`,
is an integer defined as
* `0` if `a` is `0` modulo `p`;
* `1` if `a` is a nonzero square modulo `p`
* `-1` otherwise.
Note the order of the arguments! The advantage of the order chosen here is
that `legendre_sym p` is a multiplicative function `ℤ → ℤ`.
-/
def legendre_sym (a : ℤ) : ℤ := quadratic_char (zmod p) a
namespace legendre_sym
/-- We have the congruence `legendre_sym p a ≡ a ^ (p / 2) mod p`. -/
lemma eq_pow (a : ℤ) : (legendre_sym p a : zmod p) = a ^ (p / 2) :=
begin
cases eq_or_ne (ring_char (zmod p)) 2 with hc hc,
{ by_cases ha : (a : zmod p) = 0,
{ rw [legendre_sym, ha, quadratic_char_zero,
zero_pow (nat.div_pos (fact.out p.prime).two_le (succ_pos 1))],
norm_cast, },
{ have := (ring_char_zmod_n p).symm.trans hc, -- p = 2
substI p,
rw [legendre_sym, quadratic_char_eq_one_of_char_two hc ha],
revert ha,
generalize : (a : zmod 2) = b, revert b, dec_trivial } },
{ convert quadratic_char_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two' hc (a : zmod p),
exact (card p).symm },
end
/-- If `p ∤ a`, then `legendre_sym p a` is `1` or `-1`. -/
lemma eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0) :
legendre_sym p a = 1 ∨ legendre_sym p a = -1 :=
quadratic_char_dichotomy ha
lemma eq_neg_one_iff_not_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0) :
legendre_sym p a = -1 ↔ ¬ legendre_sym p a = 1 :=
quadratic_char_eq_neg_one_iff_not_one ha
/-- The Legendre symbol of `p` and `a` is zero iff `p ∣ a`. -/
lemma eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ) : legendre_sym p a = 0 ↔ (a : zmod p) = 0 :=
quadratic_char_eq_zero_iff
@[simp] lemma at_zero : legendre_sym p 0 = 0 :=
by rw [legendre_sym, int.cast_zero, mul_char.map_zero]
@[simp] lemma at_one : legendre_sym p 1 = 1 :=
by rw [legendre_sym, int.cast_one, mul_char.map_one]
/-- The Legendre symbol is multiplicative in `a` for `p` fixed. -/
protected
lemma mul (a b : ℤ) : legendre_sym p (a * b) = legendre_sym p a * legendre_sym p b :=
by simp only [legendre_sym, int.cast_mul, map_mul]
/-- The Legendre symbol is a homomorphism of monoids with zero. -/
@[simps] def hom : ℤ →*₀ ℤ :=
{ to_fun := legendre_sym p,
map_zero' := at_zero p,
map_one' := at_one p,
map_mul' := legendre_sym.mul p }
/-- The square of the symbol is 1 if `p ∤ a`. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0) : (legendre_sym p a) ^ 2 = 1 :=
quadratic_char_sq_one ha
/-- The Legendre symbol of `a^2` at `p` is 1 if `p ∤ a`. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0) : legendre_sym p (a ^ 2) = 1 :=
by exact_mod_cast quadratic_char_sq_one' ha
/-- The Legendre symbol depends only on `a` mod `p`. -/
protected
theorem mod (a : ℤ) : legendre_sym p a = legendre_sym p (a % p) :=
by simp only [legendre_sym, int_cast_mod]
/-- When `p ∤ a`, then `legendre_sym p a = 1` iff `a` is a square mod `p`. -/
lemma eq_one_iff {a : ℤ} (ha0 : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0) :
legendre_sym p a = 1 ↔ is_square (a : zmod p) :=
quadratic_char_one_iff_is_square ha0
lemma eq_one_iff' {a : ℕ} (ha0 : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0) :
legendre_sym p a = 1 ↔ is_square (a : zmod p) :=
by {rw eq_one_iff, norm_cast, exact_mod_cast ha0}
/-- `legendre_sym p a = -1` iff `a` is a nonsquare mod `p`. -/
lemma eq_neg_one_iff {a : ℤ} : legendre_sym p a = -1 ↔ ¬ is_square (a : zmod p) :=
quadratic_char_neg_one_iff_not_is_square
lemma eq_neg_one_iff' {a : ℕ} : legendre_sym p a = -1 ↔ ¬ is_square (a : zmod p) :=
by {rw eq_neg_one_iff, norm_cast}
/-- The number of square roots of `a` modulo `p` is determined by the Legendre symbol. -/
lemma card_sqrts (hp : p ≠ 2) (a : ℤ) :
↑{x : zmod p | x^2 = a}.to_finset.card = legendre_sym p a + 1 :=
quadratic_char_card_sqrts ((ring_char_zmod_n p).substr hp) a
end legendre_sym
end legendre
section quadratic_form
/-!
### Applications to binary quadratic forms
-/
namespace legendre_sym
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendre_sym p a = 1` if there is a solution in `ℤ/pℤ`
of the equation `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` with `y ≠ 0`. -/
lemma eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
{a : ℤ} (ha : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0) {x y : zmod p} (hy : y ≠ 0) (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) :
legendre_sym p a = 1 :=
begin
apply_fun (* y⁻¹ ^ 2) at hxy,
simp only [zero_mul] at hxy,
rw [(by ring : (x ^ 2 - ↑a * y ^ 2) * y⁻¹ ^ 2 = (x * y⁻¹) ^ 2 - a * (y * y⁻¹) ^ 2),
mul_inv_cancel hy, one_pow, mul_one, sub_eq_zero, pow_two] at hxy,
exact (eq_one_iff p ha).mpr ⟨x * y⁻¹, hxy.symm⟩,
end
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendre_sym p a = 1` if there is a solution in `ℤ/pℤ`
of the equation `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` with `x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero' {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
{a : ℤ} (ha : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0) {x y : zmod p} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) :
legendre_sym p a = 1 :=
begin
have hy : y ≠ 0,
{ rintro rfl,
rw [zero_pow' 2 (by norm_num), mul_zero, sub_zero, pow_eq_zero_iff (by norm_num : 0 < 2)]
at hxy,
exacts [hx hxy, infer_instance], }, -- why is the instance not inferred automatically?
exact eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero ha hy hxy,
end
/-- If `legendre_sym p a = -1`, then the only solution of `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` in `ℤ/pℤ`
is the trivial one. -/
lemma eq_zero_mod_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime] {a : ℤ}
(h : legendre_sym p a = -1) {x y : zmod p} (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
begin
have ha : (a : zmod p) ≠ 0,
{ intro hf,
rw (eq_zero_iff p a).mpr hf at h,
exact int.zero_ne_neg_of_ne zero_ne_one h, },
by_contra hf,
cases not_and_distrib.mp hf with hx hy,
{ rw [eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero' ha hx hxy, eq_neg_self_iff] at h,
exact one_ne_zero h, },
{ rw [eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero ha hy hxy, eq_neg_self_iff] at h,
exact one_ne_zero h, }
end
/-- If `legendre_sym p a = -1` and `p` divides `x^2 - a*y^2`, then `p` must divide `x` and `y`. -/
lemma prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime] {a : ℤ}
(h : legendre_sym p a = -1) {x y : ℤ} (hxy : ↑p ∣ x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2) : ↑p ∣ x ∧ ↑p ∣ y :=
begin
simp_rw ← zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd at hxy ⊢,
push_cast at hxy,
exact eq_zero_mod_of_eq_neg_one h hxy,
end
end legendre_sym
end quadratic_form
section values
/-!
### The value of the Legendre symbol at `-1`
See `jacobi_sym.at_neg_one` for the corresponding statement for the Jacobi symbol.
-/
variables {p : ℕ} [fact p.prime]
open zmod
/-- `legendre_sym p (-1)` is given by `χ₄ p`. -/
lemma legendre_sym.at_neg_one (hp : p ≠ 2) : legendre_sym p (-1) = χ₄ p :=
by simp only [legendre_sym, card p, quadratic_char_neg_one ((ring_char_zmod_n p).substr hp),
int.cast_neg, int.cast_one]
namespace zmod
/-- `-1` is a square in `zmod p` iff `p` is not congruent to `3` mod `4`. -/
lemma exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff : is_square (-1 : zmod p) ↔ p % 4 ≠ 3 :=
by rw [finite_field.is_square_neg_one_iff, card p]
lemma mod_four_ne_three_of_sq_eq_neg_one {y : zmod p} (hy : y ^ 2 = -1) : p % 4 ≠ 3 :=
exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff.1 ⟨y, hy ▸ pow_two y⟩
/-- If two nonzero squares are negatives of each other in `zmod p`, then `p % 4 ≠ 3`. -/
lemma mod_four_ne_three_of_sq_eq_neg_sq' {x y : zmod p} (hy : y ≠ 0) (hxy : x ^ 2 = - y ^ 2) :
p % 4 ≠ 3 :=
@mod_four_ne_three_of_sq_eq_neg_one p _ (x / y) begin
apply_fun (λ z, z / y ^ 2) at hxy,
rwa [neg_div, ←div_pow, ←div_pow, div_self hy, one_pow] at hxy
end
lemma mod_four_ne_three_of_sq_eq_neg_sq {x y : zmod p} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxy : x ^ 2 = - y ^ 2) :
p % 4 ≠ 3 :=
mod_four_ne_three_of_sq_eq_neg_sq' hx (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr hxy).symm
end zmod
end values
|
e0d110fc0515dab766e386d8ef16b2c957821e5a | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/computability/tm_computable.lean | 30ddb2affce76f3b8c3b6ac90f654749620db5de | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,343 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Pim Spelier, Daan van Gent. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Pim Spelier, Daan van Gent
-/
import computability.encoding
import computability.turing_machine
import data.polynomial.basic
import data.polynomial.eval
/-!
# Computable functions
This file contains the definition of a Turing machine with some finiteness conditions
(bundling the definition of TM2 in turing_machine.lean), a definition of when a TM gives a certain
output (in a certain time), and the definition of computability (in polytime or any time function)
of a function between two types that have an encoding (as in encoding.lean).
## Main theorems
- `id_computable_in_poly_time` : a TM + a proof it computes the identity on a type in polytime.
- `id_computable` : a TM + a proof it computes the identity on a type.
## Implementation notes
To count the execution time of a Turing machine, we have decided to count the number of times the
`step` function is used. Each step executes a statement (of type stmt); this is a function, and
generally contains multiple "fundamental" steps (pushing, popping, so on). However, as functions
only contain a finite number of executions and each one is executed at most once, this execution
time is up to multiplication by a constant the amount of fundamental steps.
-/
open computability
namespace turing
/-- A bundled TM2 (an equivalent of the classical Turing machine, defined starting from
the namespace `turing.TM2` in `turing_machine.lean`), with an input and output stack,
a main function, an initial state and some finiteness guarantees. -/
structure fin_tm2 :=
{K : Type} [K_decidable_eq : decidable_eq K] [K_fin : fintype K] -- index type of stacks
(k₀ k₁ : K) -- input and output stack
(Γ : K → Type) -- type of stack elements
(Λ : Type) (main : Λ) [Λ_fin : fintype Λ] -- type of function labels
(σ : Type) (initial_state : σ) -- type of states of the machine
[σ_fin : fintype σ]
[Γk₀_fin : fintype (Γ k₀)]
(M : Λ → turing.TM2.stmt Γ Λ σ) -- the program itself, i.e. one function for every function label
namespace fin_tm2
section
variable (tm : fin_tm2)
instance : decidable_eq tm.K := tm.K_decidable_eq
instance : inhabited tm.σ := ⟨tm.initial_state⟩
/-- The type of statements (functions) corresponding to this TM. -/
@[derive inhabited]
def stmt : Type := turing.TM2.stmt tm.Γ tm.Λ tm.σ
/-- The type of configurations (functions) corresponding to this TM. -/
def cfg : Type := turing.TM2.cfg tm.Γ tm.Λ tm.σ
instance inhabited_cfg : inhabited (cfg tm) :=
turing.TM2.cfg.inhabited _ _ _
/-- The step function corresponding to this TM. -/
@[simp] def step : tm.cfg → option tm.cfg :=
turing.TM2.step tm.M
end
end fin_tm2
/-- The initial configuration corresponding to a list in the input alphabet. -/
def init_list (tm : fin_tm2) (s : list (tm.Γ tm.k₀)) : tm.cfg :=
{ l := option.some tm.main,
var := tm.initial_state,
stk := λ k, @dite (list (tm.Γ k)) (k = tm.k₀) (tm.K_decidable_eq k tm.k₀)
(λ h, begin rw h, exact s, end)
(λ _,[]) }
/-- The final configuration corresponding to a list in the output alphabet. -/
def halt_list (tm : fin_tm2) (s : list (tm.Γ tm.k₁)) : tm.cfg :=
{ l := option.none,
var := tm.initial_state,
stk := λ k, @dite (list (tm.Γ k)) (k = tm.k₁) (tm.K_decidable_eq k tm.k₁)
(λ h, begin rw h, exact s, end)
(λ _,[]) }
/-- A "proof" of the fact that f eventually reaches b when repeatedly evaluated on a,
remembering the number of steps it takes. -/
structure evals_to {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) (b : option σ) :=
(steps : ℕ)
(evals_in_steps : ((flip bind f)^[steps] a) = b)
/-- A "proof" of the fact that `f` eventually reaches `b` in at most `m` steps when repeatedly
evaluated on `a`, remembering the number of steps it takes. -/
structure evals_to_in_time {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) (b : option σ) (m : ℕ)
extends evals_to f a b :=
(steps_le_m : steps ≤ m)
/-- Reflexivity of `evals_to` in 0 steps. -/
@[refl] def evals_to.refl {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) : evals_to f a a := ⟨0,rfl⟩
/-- Transitivity of `evals_to` in the sum of the numbers of steps. -/
@[trans] def evals_to.trans {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) (b : σ) (c : option σ)
(h₁ : evals_to f a b) (h₂ : evals_to f b c) : evals_to f a c :=
⟨h₂.steps + h₁.steps,
by rw [function.iterate_add_apply,h₁.evals_in_steps,h₂.evals_in_steps]⟩
/-- Reflexivity of `evals_to_in_time` in 0 steps. -/
@[refl] def evals_to_in_time.refl {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) :
evals_to_in_time f a a 0 :=
⟨evals_to.refl f a, le_refl 0⟩
/-- Transitivity of `evals_to_in_time` in the sum of the numbers of steps. -/
@[trans] def evals_to_in_time.trans {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) (b : σ) (c : option σ)
(m₁ : ℕ) (m₂ : ℕ) (h₁ : evals_to_in_time f a b m₁) (h₂ : evals_to_in_time f b c m₂) :
evals_to_in_time f a c (m₂ + m₁) :=
⟨evals_to.trans f a b c h₁.to_evals_to h₂.to_evals_to, add_le_add h₂.steps_le_m h₁.steps_le_m⟩
/-- A proof of tm outputting l' when given l. -/
def tm2_outputs (tm : fin_tm2) (l : list (tm.Γ tm.k₀)) (l' : option (list (tm.Γ tm.k₁))) :=
evals_to tm.step (init_list tm l) ((option.map (halt_list tm)) l')
/-- A proof of tm outputting l' when given l in at most m steps. -/
def tm2_outputs_in_time (tm : fin_tm2) (l : list (tm.Γ tm.k₀))
(l' : option (list (tm.Γ tm.k₁))) (m : ℕ) :=
evals_to_in_time tm.step (init_list tm l) ((option.map (halt_list tm)) l') m
/-- The forgetful map, forgetting the upper bound on the number of steps. -/
def tm2_outputs_in_time.to_tm2_outputs {tm : fin_tm2} {l : list (tm.Γ tm.k₀)}
{l' : option (list (tm.Γ tm.k₁))} {m : ℕ} (h : tm2_outputs_in_time tm l l' m) :
tm2_outputs tm l l' :=
h.to_evals_to
/-- A Turing machine with input alphabet equivalent to Γ₀ and output alphabet equivalent to Γ₁. -/
structure tm2_computable_aux (Γ₀ Γ₁ : Type) :=
( tm : fin_tm2 )
( input_alphabet : tm.Γ tm.k₀ ≃ Γ₀ )
( output_alphabet : tm.Γ tm.k₁ ≃ Γ₁ )
/-- A Turing machine + a proof it outputs f. -/
structure tm2_computable {α β : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) (eb : fin_encoding β) (f : α → β)
extends tm2_computable_aux ea.Γ eb.Γ :=
(outputs_fun : ∀ a, tm2_outputs tm (list.map input_alphabet.inv_fun (ea.encode a))
(option.some ((list.map output_alphabet.inv_fun) (eb.encode (f a)))) )
/-- A Turing machine + a time function + a proof it outputs f in at most time(len(input)) steps. -/
structure tm2_computable_in_time {α β : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) (eb : fin_encoding β)
(f : α → β)
extends tm2_computable_aux ea.Γ eb.Γ :=
( time: ℕ → ℕ )
( outputs_fun : ∀ a, tm2_outputs_in_time tm (list.map input_alphabet.inv_fun (ea.encode a))
(option.some ((list.map output_alphabet.inv_fun) (eb.encode (f a))))
(time (ea.encode a).length) )
/-- A Turing machine + a polynomial time function + a proof it outputs f in at most time(len(input))
steps. -/
structure tm2_computable_in_poly_time {α β : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) (eb : fin_encoding β)
(f : α → β)
extends tm2_computable_aux ea.Γ eb.Γ :=
( time: polynomial ℕ )
( outputs_fun : ∀ a, tm2_outputs_in_time tm (list.map input_alphabet.inv_fun (ea.encode a))
(option.some ((list.map output_alphabet.inv_fun) (eb.encode (f a))))
(time.eval (ea.encode a).length) )
/-- A forgetful map, forgetting the time bound on the number of steps. -/
def tm2_computable_in_time.to_tm2_computable {α β : Type} {ea : fin_encoding α}
{eb : fin_encoding β} {f : α → β} (h : tm2_computable_in_time ea eb f) :
tm2_computable ea eb f :=
⟨h.to_tm2_computable_aux, λ a, tm2_outputs_in_time.to_tm2_outputs (h.outputs_fun a)⟩
/-- A forgetful map, forgetting that the time function is polynomial. -/
def tm2_computable_in_poly_time.to_tm2_computable_in_time {α β : Type} {ea : fin_encoding α}
{eb : fin_encoding β} {f : α → β} (h : tm2_computable_in_poly_time ea eb f) :
tm2_computable_in_time ea eb f :=
⟨h.to_tm2_computable_aux, λ n, h.time.eval n, h.outputs_fun⟩
open turing.TM2.stmt
/-- A Turing machine computing the identity on α. -/
def id_computer {α : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) : fin_tm2 :=
{ K := unit,
k₀ := ⟨⟩,
k₁ := ⟨⟩,
Γ := λ _, ea.Γ,
Λ := unit,
main := ⟨⟩,
σ := unit,
initial_state := ⟨⟩,
Γk₀_fin := ea.Γ_fin,
M := λ _, halt }
instance inhabited_fin_tm2 : inhabited fin_tm2 :=
⟨id_computer computability.inhabited_fin_encoding.default⟩
noncomputable theory
/-- A proof that the identity map on α is computable in polytime. -/
def id_computable_in_poly_time {α : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) :
@tm2_computable_in_poly_time α α ea ea id :=
{ tm := id_computer ea,
input_alphabet := equiv.cast rfl,
output_alphabet := equiv.cast rfl,
time := 1,
outputs_fun := λ _, { steps := 1,
evals_in_steps := rfl,
steps_le_m := by simp only [polynomial.eval_one] } }
instance inhabited_tm2_computable_in_poly_time : inhabited (tm2_computable_in_poly_time
(default (fin_encoding bool)) (default (fin_encoding bool)) id) :=
⟨id_computable_in_poly_time computability.inhabited_fin_encoding.default⟩
instance inhabited_tm2_outputs_in_time :
inhabited (tm2_outputs_in_time (id_computer fin_encoding_bool_bool)
(list.map (equiv.cast rfl).inv_fun [ff]) (some (list.map (equiv.cast rfl).inv_fun [ff])) _) :=
⟨(id_computable_in_poly_time fin_encoding_bool_bool).outputs_fun ff⟩
instance inhabited_tm2_outputs : inhabited (tm2_outputs (id_computer fin_encoding_bool_bool)
(list.map (equiv.cast rfl).inv_fun [ff]) (some (list.map (equiv.cast rfl).inv_fun [ff]))) :=
⟨tm2_outputs_in_time.to_tm2_outputs turing.inhabited_tm2_outputs_in_time.default⟩
instance inhabited_evals_to_in_time :
inhabited (evals_to_in_time (λ _ : unit, some ⟨⟩) ⟨⟩ (some ⟨⟩) 0) :=
⟨evals_to_in_time.refl _ _⟩
instance inhabited_tm2_evals_to : inhabited (evals_to (λ _ : unit, some ⟨⟩) ⟨⟩ (some ⟨⟩)) :=
⟨evals_to.refl _ _⟩
/-- A proof that the identity map on α is computable in time. -/
def id_computable_in_time {α : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) : @tm2_computable_in_time α α ea ea id :=
tm2_computable_in_poly_time.to_tm2_computable_in_time $ id_computable_in_poly_time ea
instance inhabited_tm2_computable_in_time :
inhabited (tm2_computable_in_time fin_encoding_bool_bool fin_encoding_bool_bool id) :=
⟨id_computable_in_time computability.inhabited_fin_encoding.default⟩
/-- A proof that the identity map on α is computable. -/
def id_computable {α : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) : @tm2_computable α α ea ea id :=
tm2_computable_in_time.to_tm2_computable $ id_computable_in_time ea
instance inhabited_tm2_computable :
inhabited (tm2_computable fin_encoding_bool_bool fin_encoding_bool_bool id) :=
⟨id_computable computability.inhabited_fin_encoding.default⟩
instance inhabited_tm2_computable_aux : inhabited (tm2_computable_aux bool bool) :=
⟨(default (tm2_computable fin_encoding_bool_bool fin_encoding_bool_bool id)).to_tm2_computable_aux⟩
end turing
|
373a963ff353e0ee105ca72c7ca743697852b428 | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/measure_theory/category/Meas.lean | 0e8bf24ea91fd538dcdd2524bbb438f1cc92ad32 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,112 | lean | /- Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import topology.category.Top.basic
import measure_theory.giry_monad
import category_theory.monad.algebra
/-
* Meas, the category of measurable spaces
Measurable spaces and measurable functions form a (concrete) category Meas.
Measure : Meas ⥤ Meas is the functor which sends a measurable space X
to the space of measures on X; it is a monad (the "Giry monad").
Borel : Top ⥤ Meas sends a topological space X to X equipped with the
σ-algebra of Borel sets (the σ-algebra generated by the open subsets of X).
## Tags
measurable space, giry monad, borel
-/
noncomputable theory
open category_theory measure_theory
universes u v
@[derive has_coe_to_sort]
def Meas : Type (u+1) := bundled measurable_space
namespace Meas
instance (X : Meas) : measurable_space X := X.str
/-- Construct a bundled `Meas` from the underlying type and the typeclass. -/
def of (α : Type u) [measurable_space α] : Meas := ⟨α⟩
instance unbundled_hom : unbundled_hom @measurable := ⟨@measurable_id, @measurable.comp⟩
attribute [derive [large_category, concrete_category]] Meas
instance : inhabited Meas := ⟨Meas.of empty⟩
/-- `Measure X` is the measurable space of measures over the measurable space `X`. It is the
weakest measurable space, s.t. λμ, μ s is measurable for all measurable sets `s` in `X`. An
important purpose is to assign a monadic structure on it, the Giry monad. In the Giry monad,
the pure values are the Dirac measure, and the bind operation maps to the integral:
`(μ >>= ν) s = ∫ x. (ν x) s dμ`.
In probability theory, the `Meas`-morphisms `X → Prob X` are (sub-)Markov kernels (here `Prob` is
the restriction of `Measure` to (sub-)probability space.)
-/
def Measure : Meas ⥤ Meas :=
{ obj := λX, ⟨@measure_theory.measure X.1 X.2⟩,
map := λX Y f, ⟨measure.map (f : X → Y), measure.measurable_map f f.2⟩,
map_id' := assume ⟨α, I⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, @measure.map_id α I μ,
map_comp':=
assume X Y Z ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, (measure.map_map hg hf).symm }
/-- The Giry monad, i.e. the monadic structure associated with `Measure`. -/
instance : category_theory.monad Measure.{u} :=
{ η :=
{ app := λX, ⟨@measure.dirac X.1 X.2, measure.measurable_dirac⟩,
naturality' :=
assume X Y ⟨f, hf⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume a, (measure.map_dirac hf a).symm },
μ :=
{ app := λX, ⟨@measure.join X.1 X.2, measure.measurable_join⟩,
naturality' :=
assume X Y ⟨f, hf⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, measure.join_map_map hf μ },
assoc' := assume ⟨α, I⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, @measure.join_map_join α I μ,
left_unit' := assume ⟨α, I⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, @measure.join_dirac α I μ,
right_unit' := assume ⟨α, I⟩, subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ, @measure.join_map_dirac α I μ }
/-- An example for an algebra on `Measure`: the nonnegative Lebesgue integral is a hom, behaving
nicely under the monad operations. -/
def Integral : monad.algebra Measure :=
{ A := Meas.of ennreal ,
a := ⟨λm:measure ennreal, ∫⁻ x, x ∂m, measure.measurable_lintegral measurable_id ⟩,
unit' := subtype.eq $ funext $ assume r:ennreal, lintegral_dirac _ measurable_id,
assoc' := subtype.eq $ funext $ assume μ : measure (measure ennreal),
show ∫⁻ x, x ∂ μ.join = ∫⁻ x, x ∂ (measure.map (λm:measure ennreal, ∫⁻ x, x ∂m) μ),
by rw [measure.lintegral_join, lintegral_map];
apply_rules [measurable_id, measure.measurable_lintegral] }
end Meas
instance Top.has_forget_to_Meas : has_forget₂ Top.{u} Meas.{u} :=
bundled_hom.mk_has_forget₂
borel
(λ X Y f, ⟨f.1, f.2.borel_measurable⟩)
(by intros; refl)
/-- The Borel functor, the canonical embedding of topological spaces into measurable spaces. -/
@[reducible] def Borel : Top.{u} ⥤ Meas.{u} := forget₂ Top.{u} Meas.{u}
|
5a37b2c336e9c084b26b342a85b016123ec13332 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/data/unsigned/ops.lean | f3b2239058357d761e18a2b3ee1ef69b70419b97 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,028 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.data.unsigned.basic
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.data.fin.ops
namespace Mathlib
namespace unsigned
def of_nat (n : ℕ) : unsigned :=
fin.of_nat n
protected instance has_zero : HasZero unsigned :=
{ zero := fin.of_nat 0 }
protected instance has_one : HasOne unsigned :=
{ one := fin.of_nat 1 }
protected instance has_add : Add unsigned :=
{ add := fin.add }
protected instance has_sub : Sub unsigned :=
{ sub := fin.sub }
protected instance has_mul : Mul unsigned :=
{ mul := fin.mul }
protected instance has_mod : Mod unsigned :=
{ mod := fin.mod }
protected instance has_div : Div unsigned :=
{ div := fin.div }
protected instance has_lt : HasLess unsigned :=
{ Less := fin.lt }
end unsigned
protected instance unsigned.has_le : HasLessEq unsigned :=
{ LessEq := fin.le }
|
c042b4f38d7f186f3199b951a5d7aa916c3c7dac | 4767244035cdd124e1ce3d0c81128f8929df6163 | /ring_theory/subring.lean | a3341ab0c0b21f0867bf3aef1d99ae73b73a4c83 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 5HT/mathlib | b941fecacd31a9c5dd0abad58770084b8a1e56b1 | 40fa9ade2f5649569639608db5e621e5fad0cc02 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,978,681,358 | 1,546,681,764,000 | 1,546,681,764,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,046 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import group_theory.subgroup
import data.polynomial
import algebra.ring
universes u v
open group
variables {R : Type u} [ring R]
/-- `S` is a subring: a set containing 1 and closed under multiplication, addition and and additive inverse. -/
class is_subring (S : set R) extends is_add_subgroup S, is_submonoid S : Prop.
instance subset.ring {S : set R} [is_subring S] : ring S :=
by subtype_instance
instance subtype.ring {S : set R} [is_subring S] : ring (subtype S) := subset.ring
namespace is_ring_hom
instance {S : set R} [is_subring S] : is_ring_hom (@subtype.val R S) :=
by refine {..} ; intros ; refl
instance is_subring_set_range {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [ring R] [ring S]
(f : R → S) [is_ring_hom f] : is_subring (set.range f) :=
{ zero_mem := ⟨0, is_ring_hom.map_zero f⟩,
one_mem := ⟨1, is_ring_hom.map_one f⟩,
neg_mem := λ x ⟨p, hp⟩, ⟨-p, hp ▸ is_ring_hom.map_neg f⟩,
add_mem := λ x y ⟨p, hp⟩ ⟨q, hq⟩, ⟨p + q, hp ▸ hq ▸ is_ring_hom.map_add f⟩,
mul_mem := λ x y ⟨p, hp⟩ ⟨q, hq⟩, ⟨p * q, hp ▸ hq ▸ is_ring_hom.map_mul f⟩, }
end is_ring_hom
variables {cR : Type u} [comm_ring cR]
instance subset.comm_ring {S : set cR} [is_subring S] : comm_ring S :=
by subtype_instance
instance subtype.comm_ring {S : set cR} [is_subring S] : comm_ring (subtype S) := subset.comm_ring
instance subring.domain {D : Type*} [integral_domain D] (S : set D) [is_subring S] : integral_domain S :=
by subtype_instance
namespace ring
def closure (s : set R) := add_group.closure (monoid.closure s)
variable {s : set R}
local attribute [reducible] closure
theorem exists_list_of_mem_closure {a : R} (h : a ∈ closure s) :
(∃ L : list (list R), (∀ l ∈ L, ∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s ∨ x = (-1:R)) ∧ (L.map list.prod).sum = a) :=
add_group.in_closure.rec_on h
(λ x hx, match x, monoid.exists_list_of_mem_closure hx with
| _, ⟨L, h1, rfl⟩ := ⟨[L], list.forall_mem_singleton.2 (λ r hr, or.inl (h1 r hr)), zero_add _⟩
end)
⟨[], list.forall_mem_nil _, rfl⟩
(λ b _ ih, match b, ih with
| _, ⟨L1, h1, rfl⟩ := ⟨L1.map (list.cons (-1)),
λ L2 h2, match L2, list.mem_map.1 h2 with
| _, ⟨L3, h3, rfl⟩ := list.forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨or.inr rfl, h1 L3 h3⟩
end,
by simp only [list.map_map, (∘), list.prod_cons, neg_one_mul];
exact list.rec_on L1 neg_zero.symm (λ hd tl ih,
by rw [list.map_cons, list.sum_cons, ih, list.map_cons, list.sum_cons, neg_add])⟩
end)
(λ r1 r2 hr1 hr2 ih1 ih2, match r1, r2, ih1, ih2 with
| _, _, ⟨L1, h1, rfl⟩, ⟨L2, h2, rfl⟩ := ⟨L1 ++ L2, list.forall_mem_append.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩,
by rw [list.map_append, list.sum_append]⟩
end)
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem in_closure.rec_on {C : R → Prop} {x : R} (hx : x ∈ closure s)
(h1 : C 1) (hneg1 : C (-1)) (hs : ∀ z ∈ s, ∀ n, C n → C (z * n))
(ha : ∀ {x y}, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C x :=
begin
have h0 : C 0 := add_neg_self (1:R) ▸ ha h1 hneg1,
rcases exists_list_of_mem_closure hx with ⟨L, HL, rfl⟩, clear hx,
induction L with hd tl ih, { exact h0 },
rw list.forall_mem_cons at HL,
suffices : C (list.prod hd),
{ rw [list.map_cons, list.sum_cons],
exact ha this (ih HL.2) },
replace HL := HL.1, clear ih tl,
suffices : ∃ L : list R, (∀ x ∈ L, x ∈ s) ∧ (list.prod hd = list.prod L ∨ list.prod hd = -list.prod L),
{ rcases this with ⟨L, HL', HP | HP⟩,
{ rw HP, clear HP HL hd, induction L with hd tl ih, { exact h1 },
rw list.forall_mem_cons at HL',
rw list.prod_cons,
exact hs _ HL'.1 _ (ih HL'.2) },
rw HP, clear HP HL hd, induction L with hd tl ih, { exact hneg1 },
rw [list.prod_cons, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg],
rw list.forall_mem_cons at HL',
exact hs _ HL'.1 _ (ih HL'.2) },
induction hd with hd tl ih,
{ exact ⟨[], list.forall_mem_nil _, or.inl rfl⟩ },
rw list.forall_mem_cons at HL,
rcases ih HL.2 with ⟨L, HL', HP | HP⟩; cases HL.1 with hhd hhd,
{ exact ⟨hd :: L, list.forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨hhd, HL'⟩, or.inl $
by rw [list.prod_cons, list.prod_cons, HP]⟩ },
{ exact ⟨L, HL', or.inr $ by rw [list.prod_cons, hhd, neg_one_mul, HP]⟩ },
{ exact ⟨hd :: L, list.forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨hhd, HL'⟩, or.inr $
by rw [list.prod_cons, list.prod_cons, HP, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg]⟩ },
{ exact ⟨L, HL', or.inl $ by rw [list.prod_cons, hhd, HP, neg_one_mul, neg_neg]⟩ }
end
instance : is_subring (closure s) :=
{ one_mem := add_group.mem_closure (is_submonoid.one_mem _),
mul_mem := λ a b ha hb, add_group.in_closure.rec_on hb
(λ b hb, add_group.in_closure.rec_on ha
(λ a ha, add_group.subset_closure (is_submonoid.mul_mem ha hb))
((zero_mul b).symm ▸ is_add_submonoid.zero_mem _)
(λ a ha hab, (neg_mul_eq_neg_mul a b) ▸ is_add_subgroup.neg_mem hab)
(λ a c ha hc hab hcb, (add_mul a c b).symm ▸ is_add_submonoid.add_mem hab hcb))
((mul_zero a).symm ▸ is_add_submonoid.zero_mem _)
(λ b hb hab, (neg_mul_eq_mul_neg a b) ▸ is_add_subgroup.neg_mem hab)
(λ b c hb hc hab hac, (mul_add a b c).symm ▸ is_add_submonoid.add_mem hab hac),
.. add_group.closure.is_add_subgroup _ }
theorem mem_closure {a : R} : a ∈ s → a ∈ closure s :=
add_group.mem_closure ∘ @monoid.subset_closure _ _ _ _
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure s :=
λ _, mem_closure
theorem closure_subset {t : set R} [is_subring t] : s ⊆ t → closure s ⊆ t :=
add_group.closure_subset ∘ monoid.closure_subset
theorem closure_subset_iff (s t : set R) [is_subring t] : closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
(add_group.closure_subset_iff _ t).trans
⟨set.subset.trans monoid.subset_closure, monoid.closure_subset⟩
theorem closure_mono {s t : set R} (H : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_subset $ set.subset.trans H subset_closure
end ring
|
954f24c643a5ab58502aab4791a84b9a5ca16119 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/analysis/normed_space/star/spectrum.lean | 55bd525acdbf2e3f68a93b9b34f4f0e2b0cd3eb0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,914 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import analysis.normed_space.star.basic
import analysis.normed_space.spectrum
import analysis.normed_space.star.exponential
import analysis.special_functions.exponential
import algebra.star.star_alg_hom
/-! # Spectral properties in C⋆-algebras
In this file, we establish various propreties related to the spectrum of elements in C⋆-algebras.
-/
local postfix `⋆`:std.prec.max_plus := star
section
open_locale topological_space ennreal
open filter ennreal spectrum cstar_ring
section unitary_spectrum
variables
{𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_ring E] [star_ring E] [cstar_ring E]
[normed_algebra 𝕜 E] [complete_space E]
lemma unitary.spectrum_subset_circle (u : unitary E) :
spectrum 𝕜 (u : E) ⊆ metric.sphere 0 1 :=
begin
nontriviality E,
refine λ k hk, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm.mpr (le_antisymm _ _),
{ simpa only [cstar_ring.norm_coe_unitary u] using norm_le_norm_of_mem hk },
{ rw ←unitary.coe_to_units_apply u at hk,
have hnk := ne_zero_of_mem_of_unit hk,
rw [←inv_inv (unitary.to_units u), ←spectrum.map_inv, set.mem_inv] at hk,
have : ‖k‖⁻¹ ≤ ‖↑((unitary.to_units u)⁻¹)‖, simpa only [norm_inv] using norm_le_norm_of_mem hk,
simpa using inv_le_of_inv_le (norm_pos_iff.mpr hnk) this }
end
lemma spectrum.subset_circle_of_unitary {u : E} (h : u ∈ unitary E) :
spectrum 𝕜 u ⊆ metric.sphere 0 1 :=
unitary.spectrum_subset_circle ⟨u, h⟩
end unitary_spectrum
section complex_scalars
open complex
variables {A : Type*}
[normed_ring A] [normed_algebra ℂ A] [complete_space A] [star_ring A] [cstar_ring A]
local notation `↑ₐ` := algebra_map ℂ A
lemma is_self_adjoint.spectral_radius_eq_nnnorm {a : A}
(ha : is_self_adjoint a) :
spectral_radius ℂ a = ‖a‖₊ :=
begin
have hconst : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) at_top _ := tendsto_const_nhds,
refine tendsto_nhds_unique _ hconst,
convert (spectrum.pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div_tendsto_nhds_spectral_radius (a : A)).comp
(nat.tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt one_lt_two),
refine funext (λ n, _),
rw [function.comp_app, ha.nnnorm_pow_two_pow, ennreal.coe_pow, ←rpow_nat_cast,
←rpow_mul],
simp,
end
lemma is_star_normal.spectral_radius_eq_nnnorm (a : A) [is_star_normal a] :
spectral_radius ℂ a = ‖a‖₊ :=
begin
refine (ennreal.pow_strict_mono two_ne_zero).injective _,
have heq : (λ n : ℕ, ((‖(a⋆ * a) ^ n‖₊ ^ (1 / n : ℝ)) : ℝ≥0∞))
= (λ x, x ^ 2) ∘ (λ n : ℕ, ((‖a ^ n‖₊ ^ (1 / n : ℝ)) : ℝ≥0∞)),
{ funext,
rw [function.comp_apply, ←rpow_nat_cast, ←rpow_mul, mul_comm, rpow_mul, rpow_nat_cast,
←coe_pow, sq, ←nnnorm_star_mul_self, commute.mul_pow (star_comm_self' a), star_pow], },
have h₂ := ((ennreal.continuous_pow 2).tendsto (spectral_radius ℂ a)).comp
(spectrum.pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div_tendsto_nhds_spectral_radius a),
rw ←heq at h₂,
convert tendsto_nhds_unique h₂ (pow_nnnorm_pow_one_div_tendsto_nhds_spectral_radius (a⋆ * a)),
rw [(is_self_adjoint.star_mul_self a).spectral_radius_eq_nnnorm, sq, nnnorm_star_mul_self,
coe_mul],
end
/-- Any element of the spectrum of a selfadjoint is real. -/
theorem is_self_adjoint.mem_spectrum_eq_re [star_module ℂ A] {a : A}
(ha : is_self_adjoint a) {z : ℂ} (hz : z ∈ spectrum ℂ a) : z = z.re :=
begin
let Iu := units.mk0 I I_ne_zero,
have : exp ℂ (I • z) ∈ spectrum ℂ (exp ℂ (I • a)),
by simpa only [units.smul_def, units.coe_mk0]
using spectrum.exp_mem_exp (Iu • a) (smul_mem_smul_iff.mpr hz),
exact complex.ext (of_real_re _)
(by simpa only [←complex.exp_eq_exp_ℂ, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs, abs_exp,
real.exp_eq_one_iff, smul_eq_mul, I_mul, neg_eq_zero]
using spectrum.subset_circle_of_unitary ha.exp_i_smul_unitary this),
end
/-- Any element of the spectrum of a selfadjoint is real. -/
theorem self_adjoint.mem_spectrum_eq_re [star_module ℂ A]
(a : self_adjoint A) {z : ℂ} (hz : z ∈ spectrum ℂ (a : A)) : z = z.re :=
a.prop.mem_spectrum_eq_re hz
/-- The spectrum of a selfadjoint is real -/
theorem is_self_adjoint.coe_re_map_spectrum [star_module ℂ A] {a : A}
(ha : is_self_adjoint a) : spectrum ℂ a = (coe ∘ re '' (spectrum ℂ a) : set ℂ) :=
le_antisymm (λ z hz, ⟨z, hz, (ha.mem_spectrum_eq_re hz).symm⟩) (λ z, by
{ rintros ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩,
simpa only [(ha.mem_spectrum_eq_re hz).symm, function.comp_app] using hz })
/-- The spectrum of a selfadjoint is real -/
theorem self_adjoint.coe_re_map_spectrum [star_module ℂ A] (a : self_adjoint A) :
spectrum ℂ (a : A) = (coe ∘ re '' (spectrum ℂ (a : A)) : set ℂ) :=
a.property.coe_re_map_spectrum
end complex_scalars
namespace star_alg_hom
variables {F A B : Type*}
[normed_ring A] [normed_algebra ℂ A] [complete_space A] [star_ring A] [cstar_ring A]
[normed_ring B] [normed_algebra ℂ B] [complete_space B] [star_ring B] [cstar_ring B]
[hF : star_alg_hom_class F ℂ A B] (φ : F)
include hF
/-- A star algebra homomorphism of complex C⋆-algebras is norm contractive. -/
lemma nnnorm_apply_le (a : A) : ‖(φ a : B)‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ :=
begin
suffices : ∀ s : A, is_self_adjoint s → ‖φ s‖₊ ≤ ‖s‖₊,
{ exact nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq zero_le'
(by simpa only [nnnorm_star_mul_self, map_star, map_mul]
using this _ (is_self_adjoint.star_mul_self a)) },
{ intros s hs,
simpa only [hs.spectral_radius_eq_nnnorm, (hs.star_hom_apply φ).spectral_radius_eq_nnnorm,
coe_le_coe] using (show spectral_radius ℂ (φ s) ≤ spectral_radius ℂ s,
from supr_le_supr_of_subset (alg_hom.spectrum_apply_subset φ s)) }
end
/-- A star algebra homomorphism of complex C⋆-algebras is norm contractive. -/
lemma norm_apply_le (a : A) : ‖(φ a : B)‖ ≤ ‖a‖ := nnnorm_apply_le φ a
/-- Star algebra homomorphisms between C⋆-algebras are continuous linear maps.
See note [lower instance priority] -/
@[priority 100]
noncomputable instance : continuous_linear_map_class F ℂ A B :=
{ map_continuous := λ φ, add_monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound φ 1
(by simpa only [one_mul] using nnnorm_apply_le φ),
.. alg_hom_class.linear_map_class }
end star_alg_hom
end
namespace weak_dual
open continuous_map complex
open_locale complex_star_module
variables {F A : Type*} [normed_ring A] [normed_algebra ℂ A] [complete_space A]
[star_ring A] [cstar_ring A] [star_module ℂ A] [hF : alg_hom_class F ℂ A ℂ]
include hF
/-- This instance is provided instead of `star_alg_hom_class` to avoid type class inference loops.
See note [lower instance priority] -/
@[priority 100]
noncomputable instance : star_hom_class F A ℂ :=
{ coe := λ φ, φ,
coe_injective' := fun_like.coe_injective',
map_star := λ φ a,
begin
suffices hsa : ∀ s : self_adjoint A, (φ s)⋆ = φ s,
{ rw ←real_part_add_I_smul_imaginary_part a,
simp only [map_add, map_smul, star_add, star_smul, hsa, self_adjoint.star_coe_eq] },
{ intros s,
have := alg_hom.apply_mem_spectrum φ (s : A),
rw self_adjoint.coe_re_map_spectrum s at this,
rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _, heq⟩,
rw [←heq, is_R_or_C.star_def, is_R_or_C.conj_of_real] }
end }
/-- This is not an instance to avoid type class inference loops. See
`weak_dual.complex.star_hom_class`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.alg_hom_class.star_alg_hom_class : star_alg_hom_class F ℂ A ℂ :=
{ coe := λ f, f,
.. weak_dual.complex.star_hom_class,
.. hF }
omit hF
namespace character_space
noncomputable instance : star_alg_hom_class (character_space ℂ A) ℂ A ℂ :=
{ coe := λ f, f,
.. alg_hom_class.star_alg_hom_class }
end character_space
end weak_dual
|
b755e9b6f0b7d55cda1c9a0d00ff8975e6396fa6 | 4b846d8dabdc64e7ea03552bad8f7fa74763fc67 | /library/init/util.lean | 8c56da878bebc390ed27d6427549b423a5ba6d6c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pacchiano/lean | 9324b33f3ac3b5c5647285160f9f6ea8d0d767dc | fdadada3a970377a6df8afcd629a6f2eab6e84e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,357,380,399 | 1,489,870,101,000 | 1,489,870,101,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,446 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.data.string.basic
universes u
/- This function has a native implementation that tracks time. -/
def timeit {α : Type u} (s : string) (f : thunk α) : α :=
f ()
/- This function has a native implementation that displays the given string in the regular output stream. -/
def trace {α : Type u} (s : string) (f : thunk α) : α :=
f ()
/- This function has a native implementation that shows the VM call stack. -/
def trace_call_stack {α : Type u} (f : thunk α) : α :=
f ()
/- This function has a native implementation that displays in the given position all trace messages used in f.
The arguments line and col are filled by the elaborator. -/
def scope_trace {α : Type u} {line col: nat} (f : thunk α) : α :=
f ()
/--
This function has a native implementation where
the thunk is interrupted if it takes more than 'max' "heartbeats" to compute it.
The heartbeat is approx. the maximum number of memory allocations (in thousands) performed by 'f ()'.
This is a deterministic way of interrupting long running tasks. -/
meta def try_for {α : Type u} (max : nat) (f : thunk α) : option α :=
some (f ())
meta constant undefined_core {α : Type u} (message : string) : α
meta def undefined {α : Type u} : α := undefined_core "undefined"
|
207551401ff3949df63600a1bb80dc87946784be | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/data/nat/sqrt.lean | 904d6a5311d08a028f245243be7e5eb3b28584c6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,194 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.int.basic
/-!
# Square root of natural numbers
An efficient binary implementation of a (`sqrt n`) function that
returns `s` such that
```
s*s ≤ n ≤ s*s + s + s
```
-/
namespace nat
theorem sqrt_aux_dec {b} (h : b ≠ 0) : shiftr b 2 < b :=
begin
simp only [shiftr_eq_div_pow],
apply (nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul' (dec_trivial : 0 < 4)).2,
have := nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
(dec_trivial : 1 < 4) (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h),
rwa mul_one at this
end
/-- Auxiliary function for `nat.sqrt`. See e.g.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_computing_square_roots#Binary_numeral_system_(base_2)> -/
def sqrt_aux : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| b r n := if b0 : b = 0 then r else
let b' := shiftr b 2 in
have b' < b, from sqrt_aux_dec b0,
match (n - (r + b : ℕ) : ℤ) with
| (n' : ℕ) := sqrt_aux b' (div2 r + b) n'
| _ := sqrt_aux b' (div2 r) n
end
/-- `sqrt n` is the square root of a natural number `n`. If `n` is not a
perfect square, it returns the largest `k:ℕ` such that `k*k ≤ n`. -/
@[pp_nodot] def sqrt (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
match size n with
| 0 := 0
| succ s := sqrt_aux (shiftl 1 (bit0 (div2 s))) 0 n
end
theorem sqrt_aux_0 (r n) : sqrt_aux 0 r n = r :=
by rw sqrt_aux; simp
local attribute [simp] sqrt_aux_0
theorem sqrt_aux_1 {r n b} (h : b ≠ 0) {n'} (h₂ : r + b + n' = n) :
sqrt_aux b r n = sqrt_aux (shiftr b 2) (div2 r + b) n' :=
by rw sqrt_aux; simp only [h, h₂.symm, int.coe_nat_add, if_false];
rw [add_comm _ (n':ℤ), add_sub_cancel, sqrt_aux._match_1]
theorem sqrt_aux_2 {r n b} (h : b ≠ 0) (h₂ : n < r + b) :
sqrt_aux b r n = sqrt_aux (shiftr b 2) (div2 r) n :=
begin
rw sqrt_aux; simp only [h, h₂, if_false],
cases int.eq_neg_succ_of_lt_zero
(sub_lt_zero.2 (int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt h₂)) with k e,
rw [e, sqrt_aux._match_1]
end
private def is_sqrt (n q : ℕ) : Prop := q*q ≤ n ∧ n < (q+1)*(q+1)
private lemma sqrt_aux_is_sqrt_lemma (m r n : ℕ)
(h₁ : r*r ≤ n)
(m') (hm : shiftr (2^m * 2^m) 2 = m')
(H1 : n < (r + 2^m) * (r + 2^m) →
is_sqrt n (sqrt_aux m' (r * 2^m) (n - r * r)))
(H2 : (r + 2^m) * (r + 2^m) ≤ n →
is_sqrt n (sqrt_aux m' ((r + 2^m) * 2^m) (n - (r + 2^m) * (r + 2^m)))) :
is_sqrt n (sqrt_aux (2^m * 2^m) ((2*r)*2^m) (n - r*r)) :=
begin
have b0 :=
have b0:_, from ne_of_gt (pow_pos (show 0 < 2, from dec_trivial) m),
nat.mul_ne_zero b0 b0,
have lb : n - r * r < 2 * r * 2^m + 2^m * 2^m ↔
n < (r+2^m)*(r+2^m), {
rw [nat.sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add h₁],
simp [left_distrib, right_distrib, two_mul, mul_comm, mul_assoc,
add_comm, add_assoc, add_left_comm] },
have re : div2 (2 * r * 2^m) = r * 2^m, {
rw [div2_val, mul_assoc,
nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (dec_trivial:2>0)] },
cases lt_or_ge n ((r+2^m)*(r+2^m)) with hl hl,
{ rw [sqrt_aux_2 b0 (lb.2 hl), hm, re], apply H1 hl },
{ cases le.dest hl with n' e,
rw [@sqrt_aux_1 (2 * r * 2^m) (n-r*r) (2^m * 2^m) b0 (n - (r + 2^m) * (r + 2^m)),
hm, re, ← right_distrib],
{ apply H2 hl },
apply eq.symm, apply nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add,
rw [← add_assoc, (_ : r*r + _ = _)],
exact (nat.add_sub_cancel' hl).symm,
simp [left_distrib, right_distrib, two_mul, mul_comm, mul_assoc, add_assoc] },
end
private lemma sqrt_aux_is_sqrt (n) : ∀ m r,
r*r ≤ n → n < (r + 2^(m+1)) * (r + 2^(m+1)) →
is_sqrt n (sqrt_aux (2^m * 2^m) (2*r*2^m) (n - r*r))
| 0 r h₁ h₂ := by apply sqrt_aux_is_sqrt_lemma 0 r n h₁ 0 rfl;
intros; simp; [exact ⟨h₁, a⟩, exact ⟨a, h₂⟩]
| (m+1) r h₁ h₂ := begin
apply sqrt_aux_is_sqrt_lemma
(m+1) r n h₁ (2^m * 2^m)
(by simp [shiftr, pow_succ, div2_val, mul_comm, mul_left_comm];
repeat {rw @nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ 2 dec_trivial});
intros,
{ have := sqrt_aux_is_sqrt m r h₁ a,
simpa [pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_assoc] },
{ rw [pow_succ', mul_two, ← add_assoc] at h₂,
have := sqrt_aux_is_sqrt m (r + 2^(m+1)) a h₂,
rwa show (r + 2^(m + 1)) * 2^(m+1) = 2 * (r + 2^(m + 1)) * 2^m,
by simp [pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] }
end
private lemma sqrt_is_sqrt (n : ℕ) : is_sqrt n (sqrt n) :=
begin
generalize e : size n = s, cases s with s; simp [e, sqrt],
{ rw [size_eq_zero.1 e, is_sqrt], exact dec_trivial },
{ have := sqrt_aux_is_sqrt n (div2 s) 0 (zero_le _),
simp [show 2^div2 s * 2^div2 s = shiftl 1 (bit0 (div2 s)), by {
generalize: div2 s = x,
change bit0 x with x+x,
rw [one_shiftl, pow_add] }] at this,
apply this,
rw [← pow_add, ← mul_two], apply size_le.1,
rw e, apply (@div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ 2 dec_trivial).1,
rw [div2_val], apply lt_succ_self }
end
theorem sqrt_le (n : ℕ) : sqrt n * sqrt n ≤ n :=
(sqrt_is_sqrt n).left
theorem lt_succ_sqrt (n : ℕ) : n < succ (sqrt n) * succ (sqrt n) :=
(sqrt_is_sqrt n).right
theorem sqrt_le_add (n : ℕ) : n ≤ sqrt n * sqrt n + sqrt n + sqrt n :=
by rw ← succ_mul; exact le_of_lt_succ (lt_succ_sqrt n)
theorem le_sqrt {m n : ℕ} : m ≤ sqrt n ↔ m*m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, le_trans (mul_self_le_mul_self h) (sqrt_le n),
λ h, le_of_lt_succ $ mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff.2 $
lt_of_le_of_lt h (lt_succ_sqrt n)⟩
theorem sqrt_lt {m n : ℕ} : sqrt m < n ↔ m < n*n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_sqrt
theorem sqrt_le_self (n : ℕ) : sqrt n ≤ n :=
le_trans (le_mul_self _) (sqrt_le n)
theorem sqrt_le_sqrt {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : sqrt m ≤ sqrt n :=
le_sqrt.2 (le_trans (sqrt_le _) h)
theorem sqrt_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : sqrt n = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
⟨λ h, eq_zero_of_le_zero $ le_of_lt_succ $ (@sqrt_lt n 1).1 $
by rw [h]; exact dec_trivial,
λ e, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem eq_sqrt {n q} : q = sqrt n ↔ q*q ≤ n ∧ n < (q+1)*(q+1) :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ sqrt_is_sqrt n,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, le_antisymm (le_sqrt.2 h₁) (le_of_lt_succ $ sqrt_lt.2 h₂)⟩
theorem le_three_of_sqrt_eq_one {n : ℕ} (h : sqrt n = 1) : n ≤ 3 :=
le_of_lt_succ $ (@sqrt_lt n 2).1 $
by rw [h]; exact dec_trivial
theorem sqrt_lt_self {n : ℕ} (h : 1 < n) : sqrt n < n :=
sqrt_lt.2 $ by
have := nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (lt_of_succ_lt h);
rwa [mul_one] at this
theorem sqrt_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < sqrt n ↔ 0 < n := le_sqrt
theorem sqrt_add_eq (n : ℕ) {a : ℕ} (h : a ≤ n + n) : sqrt (n*n + a) = n :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_lt_succ $ sqrt_lt.2 $ by rw [succ_mul, mul_succ, add_succ, add_assoc];
exact lt_succ_of_le (nat.add_le_add_left h _))
(le_sqrt.2 $ nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem sqrt_eq (n : ℕ) : sqrt (n*n) = n :=
sqrt_add_eq n (zero_le _)
theorem sqrt_succ_le_succ_sqrt (n : ℕ) : sqrt n.succ ≤ n.sqrt.succ :=
le_of_lt_succ $ sqrt_lt.2 $ lt_succ_of_le $ succ_le_succ $
le_trans (sqrt_le_add n) $ add_le_add_right
(by refine add_le_add
(mul_le_mul_right _ _) _; exact le_add_right _ 2) _
theorem exists_mul_self (x : ℕ) :
(∃ n, n * n = x) ↔ sqrt x * sqrt x = x :=
⟨λ ⟨n, hn⟩, by rw [← hn, sqrt_eq], λ h, ⟨sqrt x, h⟩⟩
end nat
|
ba00f8f67bf6d7dd67379043e541416be883a746 | d9d511f37a523cd7659d6f573f990e2a0af93c6f | /src/algebra/floor.lean | dc8c6fce6d9951a77a0e31e35dc16a025ee7f826 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hikari0108/mathlib | b7ea2b7350497ab1a0b87a09d093ecc025a50dfa | a9e7d333b0cfd45f13a20f7b96b7d52e19fa2901 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,483,608,260 | 1,631,541,580,000 | 1,631,541,580,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,655 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import tactic.linarith
import tactic.abel
import algebra.ordered_group
import data.set.intervals.basic
/-!
# Floor and ceil
## Summary
We define `floor`, `ceil`, `nat_floor`and `nat_ceil` functions on linear ordered rings.
## Main Definitions
- `floor_ring`: Linear ordered ring with a floor function.
- `floor x`: Greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ x`.
- `ceil x`: Least integer `z` such that `x ≤ z`.
- `fract x`: Fractional part of `x`, defined as `x - floor x`.
- `nat_floor x`: Greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ x`. Defined as `0` if `x < 0`.
- `nat_ceil x`: Least natural `n` such that `x ≤ n`.
## Notations
- `⌊x⌋` is `floor x`.
- `⌈x⌉` is `ceil x`.
- `⌊x⌋₊` is `nat_floor x`.
- `⌈x⌉₊` is `nat_ceil x`.
The index `₊` in the notations for `nat_floor` and `nat_ceil` is used in analogy to the notation
for `nnnorm`.
## Tags
rounding, floor, ceil
-/
variables {α : Type*}
open_locale classical
/-! ### Floor rings -/
/--
A `floor_ring` is a linear ordered ring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℤ` satisfying `∀ (z : ℤ) (x : α), z ≤ floor x ↔ (z : α) ≤ x)`.
-/
class floor_ring (α) [linear_ordered_ring α] :=
(floor : α → ℤ)
(le_floor : ∀ (z : ℤ) (x : α), z ≤ floor x ↔ (z : α) ≤ x)
instance : floor_ring ℤ := { floor := id, le_floor := λ _ _, by rw int.cast_id; refl }
variables [linear_ordered_ring α] [floor_ring α]
/-- `floor x` is the greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ x`. It is denoted with `⌊x⌋`. -/
def floor : α → ℤ := floor_ring.floor
notation `⌊` x `⌋` := floor x
theorem le_floor : ∀ {z : ℤ} {x : α}, z ≤ ⌊x⌋ ↔ (z : α) ≤ x :=
floor_ring.le_floor
theorem floor_lt {x : α} {z : ℤ} : ⌊x⌋ < z ↔ x < z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_floor
theorem floor_le (x : α) : (⌊x⌋ : α) ≤ x :=
le_floor.1 (le_refl _)
theorem floor_nonneg {x : α} : 0 ≤ ⌊x⌋ ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
by rw [le_floor]; refl
theorem lt_succ_floor (x : α) : x < ⌊x⌋.succ :=
floor_lt.1 $ int.lt_succ_self _
theorem lt_floor_add_one (x : α) : x < ⌊x⌋ + 1 :=
by simpa only [int.succ, int.cast_add, int.cast_one] using lt_succ_floor x
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (x : α) : x - 1 < ⌊x⌋ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (lt_floor_add_one x)
@[simp] theorem floor_coe (z : ℤ) : ⌊(z:α)⌋ = z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ a, by rw [le_floor, int.cast_le]
@[simp] theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0:α)⌋ = 0 := floor_coe 0
@[simp] theorem floor_one : ⌊(1:α)⌋ = 1 :=
by rw [← int.cast_one, floor_coe]
@[mono] theorem floor_mono {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ ⌊b⌋ :=
le_floor.2 (le_trans (floor_le _) h)
@[simp] theorem floor_add_int (x : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊x + z⌋ = ⌊x⌋ + z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff $ λ a, by rw [le_floor,
← sub_le_iff_le_add, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, int.cast_sub]
@[simp] theorem floor_int_add (z : ℤ) (x : α) : ⌊↑z + x⌋ = z + ⌊x⌋ :=
by simpa only [add_comm] using floor_add_int x z
@[simp] theorem floor_add_nat (x : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊x + n⌋ = ⌊x⌋ + n :=
floor_add_int x n
@[simp] theorem floor_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : α) : ⌊↑n + x⌋ = n + ⌊x⌋ :=
floor_int_add n x
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_int (x : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊x - z⌋ = ⌊x⌋ - z :=
eq.trans (by rw [int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (floor_add_int _ _)
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_nat (x : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊x - n⌋ = ⌊x⌋ - n :=
floor_sub_int x n
lemma abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor {α : Type*} [linear_ordered_comm_ring α]
[floor_ring α] {x y : α} (h : ⌊x⌋ = ⌊y⌋) : abs (x - y) < 1 :=
begin
have : x < ⌊x⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one x,
have : y < ⌊y⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one y,
have : (⌊x⌋ : α) = ⌊y⌋ := int.cast_inj.2 h,
have : (⌊x⌋: α) ≤ x := floor_le x,
have : (⌊y⌋ : α) ≤ y := floor_le y,
exact abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
end
lemma floor_eq_iff {r : α} {z : ℤ} :
⌊r⌋ = z ↔ ↑z ≤ r ∧ r < (z + 1) :=
by rw [←le_floor, ←int.cast_one, ←int.cast_add, ←floor_lt,
int.lt_add_one_iff, le_antisymm_iff, and.comm]
lemma floor_ring_unique {α} [linear_ordered_ring α] (inst1 inst2 : floor_ring α) :
@floor _ _ inst1 = @floor _ _ inst2 :=
begin
ext v,
suffices : (⌊v⌋ : α) ≤ v ∧ v < ⌊v⌋ + 1, by rwa [floor_eq_iff],
exact ⟨floor_le v, lt_floor_add_one v⟩
end
lemma floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℤ) : ∀ x ∈ (set.Ico n (n+1) : set α), ⌊x⌋ = n :=
λ x ⟨h₀, h₁⟩, floor_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
lemma floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℤ) : ∀ x ∈ (set.Ico n (n+1) : set α), (⌊x⌋ : α) = n :=
λ x hx, by exact_mod_cast floor_eq_on_Ico n x hx
/-- The fractional part fract r of r is just r - ⌊r⌋ -/
def fract (r : α) : α := r - ⌊r⌋
-- Mathematical notation is usually {r}. Let's not even go there.
@[simp] lemma floor_add_fract (r : α) : (⌊r⌋ : α) + fract r = r := by unfold fract; simp
@[simp] lemma fract_add_floor (r : α) : fract r + ⌊r⌋ = r := sub_add_cancel _ _
theorem fract_nonneg (r : α) : 0 ≤ fract r :=
sub_nonneg.2 $ floor_le _
theorem fract_lt_one (r : α) : fract r < 1 :=
sub_lt.1 $ sub_one_lt_floor _
@[simp] lemma fract_zero : fract (0 : α) = 0 := by unfold fract; simp
@[simp] lemma fract_coe (z : ℤ) : fract (z : α) = 0 :=
by unfold fract; rw floor_coe; exact sub_self _
@[simp] lemma fract_floor (r : α) : fract (⌊r⌋ : α) = 0 := fract_coe _
@[simp] lemma floor_fract (r : α) : ⌊fract r⌋ = 0 :=
by rw floor_eq_iff; exact ⟨fract_nonneg _,
by rw [int.cast_zero, zero_add]; exact fract_lt_one r⟩
theorem fract_eq_iff {r s : α} : fract r = s ↔ 0 ≤ s ∧ s < 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, r - s = z :=
⟨λ h, by rw ←h; exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _,
⟨⌊r⌋, sub_sub_cancel _ _⟩⟩, begin
intro h,
show r - ⌊r⌋ = s, apply eq.symm,
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_comm, ←eq_sub_iff_add_eq],
rcases h with ⟨hge, hlt, ⟨z, hz⟩⟩,
rw [hz, int.cast_inj, floor_eq_iff, ←hz],
clear hz, split; simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
end⟩
theorem fract_eq_fract {r s : α} : fract r = fract s ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, r - s = z :=
⟨λ h, ⟨⌊r⌋ - ⌊s⌋, begin
unfold fract at h, rw [int.cast_sub, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub.1 h],
end⟩,
λ h, begin
rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw fract_eq_iff,
split, exact fract_nonneg _,
split, exact fract_lt_one _,
use z + ⌊s⌋,
rw [eq_add_of_sub_eq hz, int.cast_add],
unfold fract, simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
end⟩
@[simp] lemma fract_fract (r : α) : fract (fract r) = fract r :=
by rw fract_eq_fract; exact ⟨-⌊r⌋, by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, fract]⟩
theorem fract_add (r s : α) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract (r + s) - fract r - fract s = z :=
⟨⌊r⌋ + ⌊s⌋ - ⌊r + s⌋, by unfold fract; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]; abel⟩
theorem fract_mul_nat (r : α) (b : ℕ) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract r * b - fract (r * b) = z :=
begin
induction b with c hc,
use 0, simp,
rcases hc with ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.cast_add, mul_add, mul_add, nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_one],
rcases fract_add (r * c) r with ⟨y, hy⟩,
use z - y,
rw [int.cast_sub, ←hz, ←hy],
abel
end
/-- `ceil x` is the smallest integer `z` such that `x ≤ z`. It is denoted with `⌈x⌉`. -/
def ceil (x : α) : ℤ := -⌊-x⌋
notation `⌈` x `⌉` := ceil x
theorem ceil_le {z : ℤ} {x : α} : ⌈x⌉ ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z :=
by rw [ceil, neg_le, le_floor, int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem lt_ceil {x : α} {z : ℤ} : z < ⌈x⌉ ↔ (z:α) < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (x : α) : ⌈x⌉ ≤ ⌊x⌋ + 1 :=
by rw [ceil_le, int.cast_add, int.cast_one]; exact le_of_lt (lt_floor_add_one x)
theorem le_ceil (x : α) : x ≤ ⌈x⌉ :=
ceil_le.1 (le_refl _)
@[simp] theorem ceil_coe (z : ℤ) : ⌈(z:α)⌉ = z :=
by rw [ceil, ← int.cast_neg, floor_coe, neg_neg]
theorem ceil_mono {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : ⌈a⌉ ≤ ⌈b⌉ :=
ceil_le.2 (le_trans h (le_ceil _))
@[simp] theorem ceil_add_int (x : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈x + z⌉ = ⌈x⌉ + z :=
by rw [ceil, neg_add', floor_sub_int, neg_sub, sub_eq_neg_add]; refl
theorem ceil_sub_int (x : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈x - z⌉ = ⌈x⌉ - z :=
eq.trans (by rw [int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (ceil_add_int _ _)
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (x : α) : (⌈x⌉ : α) < x + 1 :=
by rw [← lt_ceil, ← int.cast_one, ceil_add_int]; apply lt_add_one
lemma ceil_pos {a : α} : 0 < ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a :=
⟨ λ h, have ⌊-a⌋ < 0, from neg_of_neg_pos h,
pos_of_neg_neg $ lt_of_not_ge $ (not_iff_not_of_iff floor_nonneg).1 $ not_le_of_gt this,
λ h, have -a < 0, from neg_neg_of_pos h,
neg_pos_of_neg $ lt_of_not_ge $ (not_iff_not_of_iff floor_nonneg).2 $ not_le_of_gt this ⟩
@[simp] theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉ = 0 := by simp [ceil]
lemma ceil_nonneg {q : α} (hq : 0 ≤ q) : 0 ≤ ⌈q⌉ :=
if h : q > 0 then le_of_lt $ ceil_pos.2 h
else by rw [le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt h) hq, ceil_zero]; trivial
lemma ceil_eq_iff {r : α} {z : ℤ} :
⌈r⌉ = z ↔ ↑z-1 < r ∧ r ≤ z :=
by rw [←ceil_le, ←int.cast_one, ←int.cast_sub, ←lt_ceil,
int.sub_one_lt_iff, le_antisymm_iff, and.comm]
lemma ceil_eq_on_Ioc (n : ℤ) : ∀ x ∈ (set.Ioc (n-1) n : set α), ⌈x⌉ = n :=
λ x ⟨h₀, h₁⟩, ceil_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
lemma ceil_eq_on_Ioc' (n : ℤ) : ∀ x ∈ (set.Ioc (n-1) n : set α), (⌈x⌉ : α) = n :=
λ x hx, by exact_mod_cast ceil_eq_on_Ioc n x hx
lemma floor_lt_ceil_of_lt {x y : α} (h : x < y) : ⌊x⌋ < ⌈y⌉ :=
by { rw floor_lt, exact h.trans_le (le_ceil _) }
/-! ### `nat_floor` and `nat_ceil` -/
section nat
variables {a : α} {n : ℕ}
/-- `nat_floor x` is the greatest natural `n` that is less than `x`.
It is equal to `⌊x⌋` when `x ≥ 0`, and is `0` otherwise. It is denoted with `⌊x⌋₊`.-/
def nat_floor (a : α) : ℕ := int.to_nat ⌊a⌋
notation `⌊` x `⌋₊` := nat_floor x
lemma nat_floor_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 :=
begin
apply int.to_nat_of_nonpos,
exact_mod_cast (floor_le a).trans ha,
end
lemma pos_of_nat_floor_pos (h : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊) : 0 < a :=
begin
refine (le_or_lt a 0).resolve_left (λ ha, lt_irrefl 0 _),
rwa nat_floor_of_nonpos ha at h,
end
lemma nat_floor_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ↑⌊a⌋₊ ≤ a :=
begin
refine le_trans _ (floor_le _),
norm_cast,
exact (int.to_nat_of_nonneg (floor_nonneg.2 ha)).le,
end
lemma le_nat_floor_of_le (h : ↑n ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ :=
begin
have hn := int.le_to_nat n,
norm_cast at hn,
exact hn.trans (int.to_nat_le_to_nat (le_floor.2 h)),
end
theorem le_nat_floor_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ ↑n ≤ a :=
⟨λ h, (nat.cast_le.2 h).trans (nat_floor_le ha), le_nat_floor_of_le⟩
lemma lt_of_lt_nat_floor (h : n < ⌊a⌋₊) : ↑n < a :=
(nat.cast_lt.2 h).trans_le (nat_floor_le (pos_of_nat_floor_pos ((nat.zero_le n).trans_lt h)).le)
theorem nat_floor_lt_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < ↑n :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 (le_nat_floor_iff ha)
theorem nat_floor_mono {a₁ a₂ : α} (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : ⌊a₁⌋₊ ≤ ⌊a₂⌋₊ :=
begin
obtain ha | ha := le_total a₁ 0,
{ rw nat_floor_of_nonpos ha,
exact nat.zero_le _ },
exact le_nat_floor_of_le ((nat_floor_le ha).trans h),
end
@[simp] theorem nat_floor_coe (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
begin
rw nat_floor,
convert int.to_nat_coe_nat n,
exact floor_coe n,
end
@[simp] theorem nat_floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋₊ = 0 := nat_floor_coe 0
theorem nat_floor_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + n :=
begin
change int.to_nat ⌊a + (n : ℤ)⌋ = int.to_nat ⌊a⌋ + n,
rw [floor_add_int, int.to_nat_add_nat (le_floor.2 ha)],
end
lemma lt_nat_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 :=
begin
refine (lt_floor_add_one a).trans_le (add_le_add_right _ 1),
norm_cast,
exact int.le_to_nat _,
end
lemma nat_floor_eq_zero_iff : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 ↔ a < 1 :=
begin
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0,
{ exact iff_of_true (nat_floor_of_nonpos ha) (ha.trans_lt zero_lt_one) },
rw [←nat.cast_one, ←nat_floor_lt_iff ha, nat.lt_add_one_iff, nat.le_zero_iff],
end
/-- `nat_ceil x` is the least natural `n` that is greater than `x`.
It is equal to `⌈x⌉` when `x ≥ 0`, and is `0` otherwise. It is denoted with `⌈x⌉₊`. -/
def nat_ceil (a : α) : ℕ := int.to_nat ⌈a⌉
notation `⌈` x `⌉₊` := nat_ceil x
@[simp] theorem nat_ceil_le : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n :=
by rw [nat_ceil, int.to_nat_le, ceil_le]; refl
theorem lt_nat_ceil : n < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a :=
not_iff_not.1 $ by rw [not_lt, not_lt, nat_ceil_le]
theorem le_nat_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ := nat_ceil_le.1 (le_refl _)
theorem nat_ceil_mono {a₁ a₂ : α} (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : ⌈a₁⌉₊ ≤ ⌈a₂⌉₊ :=
nat_ceil_le.2 (le_trans h (le_nat_ceil _))
@[simp] theorem nat_ceil_coe (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉₊ = n :=
show (⌈((n : ℤ) : α)⌉).to_nat = n, by rw [ceil_coe]; refl
@[simp] theorem nat_ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉₊ = 0 := nat_ceil_coe 0
@[simp] theorem nat_ceil_eq_zero : ⌈a⌉₊ = 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 :=
by simp [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
theorem nat_ceil_add_nat {a : α} (a_nonneg : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + n :=
begin
change int.to_nat (⌈a + (n:ℤ)⌉) = int.to_nat ⌈a⌉ + n,
rw [ceil_add_int],
have : 0 ≤ ⌈a⌉, by simpa using (ceil_mono a_nonneg),
obtain ⟨_, ceil_a_eq⟩ : ∃ (n : ℕ), ⌈a⌉ = n, from int.eq_coe_of_zero_le this,
rw ceil_a_eq,
refl
end
theorem nat_ceil_lt_add_one {a : α} (a_nonneg : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : α) < a + 1 :=
lt_nat_ceil.1 $ by rw (
show ⌈a + 1⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + 1, by exact_mod_cast (nat_ceil_add_nat a_nonneg 1));
apply nat.lt_succ_self
lemma lt_of_nat_ceil_lt {x : α} {n : ℕ} (h : ⌈x⌉₊ < n) : x < n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_nat_ceil x) (by exact_mod_cast h)
lemma le_of_nat_ceil_le {x : α} {n : ℕ} (h : ⌈x⌉₊ ≤ n) : x ≤ n :=
le_trans (le_nat_ceil x) (by exact_mod_cast h)
lemma nat_floor_lt_nat_ceil_of_lt_of_pos {x y : α} (h : x < y) (h' : 0 < y) :
⌊x⌋₊ < ⌈y⌉₊ :=
begin
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx|hx,
{ rw nat_floor_lt_iff hx, exact h.trans_le (le_nat_ceil _) },
{ rwa [nat_floor_of_nonpos hx.le, lt_nat_ceil] }
end
end nat
namespace int
@[simp] lemma preimage_Ioo {x y : α} :
((coe : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' (set.Ioo x y)) = set.Ioo ⌊x⌋ ⌈y⌉ :=
by { ext, simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil] }
@[simp] lemma preimage_Ico {x y : α} :
((coe : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' (set.Ico x y)) = set.Ico ⌈x⌉ ⌈y⌉ :=
by { ext, simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil] }
@[simp] lemma preimage_Ioc {x y : α} :
((coe : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' (set.Ioc x y)) = set.Ioc ⌊x⌋ ⌊y⌋ :=
by { ext, simp [floor_lt, le_floor] }
@[simp] lemma preimage_Icc {x y : α} :
((coe : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' (set.Icc x y)) = set.Icc ⌈x⌉ ⌊y⌋ :=
by { ext, simp [ceil_le, le_floor] }
@[simp] lemma preimage_Ioi {x : α} : ((coe : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' (set.Ioi x)) = set.Ioi ⌊x⌋ :=
by { ext, simp [floor_lt] }
@[simp] lemma preimage_Ici {x : α} : ((coe : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' (set.Ici x)) = set.Ici ⌈x⌉ :=
by { ext, simp [ceil_le] }
@[simp] lemma preimage_Iio {x : α} : ((coe : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' (set.Iio x)) = set.Iio ⌈x⌉ :=
by { ext, simp [lt_ceil] }
@[simp] lemma preimage_Iic {x : α} : ((coe : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' (set.Iic x)) = set.Iic ⌊x⌋ :=
by { ext, simp [le_floor] }
end int
|
6460419d6ba7d68a12a537d16ccab33236cf7029 | 02005f45e00c7ecf2c8ca5db60251bd1e9c860b5 | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/images.lean | 8beebd55492e433182f428b62f14bc97b637808b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anthony2698/mathlib | 03cd69fe5c280b0916f6df2d07c614c8e1efe890 | 407615e05814e98b24b2ff322b14e8e3eb5e5d67 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,792,774,873 | 1,614,371,563,000 | 1,614,371,563,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,339 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import category_theory.limits.shapes.equalizers
import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks
import category_theory.limits.shapes.strong_epi
/-!
# Categorical images
We define the categorical image of `f` as a factorisation `f = e ≫ m` through a monomorphism `m`,
so that `m` factors through the `m'` in any other such factorisation.
## Main definitions
* A `mono_factorisation` is a factorisation `f = e ≫ m`, where `m` is a monomorphism
* `is_image F` means that a given mono factorisation `F` has the universal property of the image.
* `has_image f` means that we have chosen an image for the morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`.
* In this case, `image f` is the image object, `image.ι f : image f ⟶ Y` is the monomorphism `m`
of the factorisation and `factor_thru_image f : X ⟶ image f` is the morphism `e`.
* `has_images C` means that every morphism in `C` has an image.
* Let `f : X ⟶ Y` and `g : P ⟶ Q` be morphisms in `C`, which we will represent as objects of the
arrow category `arrow C`. Then `sq : f ⟶ g` is a commutative square in `C`. If `f` and `g` have
images, then `has_image_map sq` represents the fact that there is a morphism
`i : image f ⟶ image g` making the diagram
X ----→ image f ----→ Y
| | |
| | |
↓ ↓ ↓
P ----→ image g ----→ Q
commute, where the top row is the image factorisation of `f`, the bottom row is the image
factorisation of `g`, and the outer rectangle is the commutative square `sq`.
* If a category `has_images`, then `has_image_maps` means that every commutative square admits an
image map.
* If a category `has_images`, then `has_strong_epi_images` means that the morphism to the image is
always a strong epimorphism.
## Main statements
* When `C` has equalizers, the morphism `e` appearing in an image factorisation is an epimorphism.
* When `C` has strong epi images, then these images admit image maps.
## Future work
* TODO: coimages, and abelian categories.
* TODO: connect this with existing working in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair
namespace category_theory.limits
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
variables {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
/-- A factorisation of a morphism `f = e ≫ m`, with `m` monic. -/
structure mono_factorisation (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(I : C)
(m : I ⟶ Y)
[m_mono : mono m]
(e : X ⟶ I)
(fac' : e ≫ m = f . obviously)
restate_axiom mono_factorisation.fac'
attribute [simp, reassoc] mono_factorisation.fac
attribute [instance] mono_factorisation.m_mono
attribute [instance] mono_factorisation.m_mono
namespace mono_factorisation
/-- The obvious factorisation of a monomorphism through itself. -/
def self [mono f] : mono_factorisation f :=
{ I := X,
m := f,
e := 𝟙 X }
-- I'm not sure we really need this, but the linter says that an inhabited instance
-- ought to exist...
instance [mono f] : inhabited (mono_factorisation f) := ⟨self f⟩
/-- The morphism `m` in a factorisation `f = e ≫ m` through a monomorphism is uniquely
determined. -/
@[ext]
lemma ext
{F F' : mono_factorisation f} (hI : F.I = F'.I) (hm : F.m = (eq_to_hom hI) ≫ F'.m) : F = F' :=
begin
cases F, cases F',
cases hI,
simp at hm,
dsimp at F_fac' F'_fac',
congr,
{ assumption },
{ resetI, apply (cancel_mono F_m).1,
rw [F_fac', hm, F'_fac'], }
end
end mono_factorisation
variable {f}
/-- Data exhibiting that a given factorisation through a mono is initial. -/
structure is_image (F : mono_factorisation f) :=
(lift : Π (F' : mono_factorisation f), F.I ⟶ F'.I)
(lift_fac' : Π (F' : mono_factorisation f), lift F' ≫ F'.m = F.m . obviously)
restate_axiom is_image.lift_fac'
attribute [simp, reassoc] is_image.lift_fac
@[simp, reassoc] lemma is_image.fac_lift {F : mono_factorisation f} (hF : is_image F)
(F' : mono_factorisation f) : F.e ≫ hF.lift F' = F'.e :=
(cancel_mono F'.m).1 $ by simp
variable (f)
namespace is_image
/-- The trivial factorisation of a monomorphism satisfies the universal property. -/
@[simps]
def self [mono f] : is_image (mono_factorisation.self f) :=
{ lift := λ F', F'.e }
instance [mono f] : inhabited (is_image (mono_factorisation.self f)) :=
⟨self f⟩
variable {f}
/-- Two factorisations through monomorphisms satisfying the universal property
must factor through isomorphic objects. -/
-- TODO this is another good candidate for a future `unique_up_to_canonical_iso`.
@[simps]
def iso_ext {F F' : mono_factorisation f} (hF : is_image F) (hF' : is_image F') : F.I ≅ F'.I :=
{ hom := hF.lift F',
inv := hF'.lift F,
hom_inv_id' := (cancel_mono F.m).1 (by simp),
inv_hom_id' := (cancel_mono F'.m).1 (by simp) }
variables {F F' : mono_factorisation f} (hF : is_image F) (hF' : is_image F')
lemma iso_ext_hom_m : (iso_ext hF hF').hom ≫ F'.m = F.m := by simp
lemma iso_ext_inv_m : (iso_ext hF hF').inv ≫ F.m = F'.m := by simp
lemma e_iso_ext_hom : F.e ≫ (iso_ext hF hF').hom = F'.e := by simp
lemma e_iso_ext_inv : F'.e ≫ (iso_ext hF hF').inv = F.e := by simp
end is_image
/-- Data exhibiting that a morphism `f` has an image. -/
structure image_factorisation (f : X ⟶ Y) :=
(F : mono_factorisation f)
(is_image : is_image F)
instance inhabited_image_factorisation (f : X ⟶ Y) [mono f] : inhabited (image_factorisation f) :=
⟨⟨_, is_image.self f⟩⟩
/-- `has_image f` means that there exists an image factorisation of `f`. -/
class has_image (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
mk' :: (exists_image : nonempty (image_factorisation f))
lemma has_image.mk {f : X ⟶ Y} (F : image_factorisation f) : has_image f :=
⟨nonempty.intro F⟩
section
variable [has_image f]
/-- The chosen factorisation of `f` through a monomorphism. -/
def image.mono_factorisation : mono_factorisation f :=
(classical.choice (has_image.exists_image)).F
/-- The witness of the universal property for the chosen factorisation of `f` through
a monomorphism. -/
def image.is_image : is_image (image.mono_factorisation f) :=
(classical.choice (has_image.exists_image)).is_image
/-- The categorical image of a morphism. -/
def image : C := (image.mono_factorisation f).I
/-- The inclusion of the image of a morphism into the target. -/
def image.ι : image f ⟶ Y := (image.mono_factorisation f).m
@[simp] lemma image.as_ι : (image.mono_factorisation f).m = image.ι f := rfl
instance : mono (image.ι f) := (image.mono_factorisation f).m_mono
/-- The map from the source to the image of a morphism. -/
def factor_thru_image : X ⟶ image f := (image.mono_factorisation f).e
/-- Rewrite in terms of the `factor_thru_image` interface. -/
@[simp]
lemma as_factor_thru_image : (image.mono_factorisation f).e = factor_thru_image f := rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma image.fac : factor_thru_image f ≫ image.ι f = f := (image.mono_factorisation f).fac'
variable {f}
/-- Any other factorisation of the morphism `f` through a monomorphism receives a map from the
image. -/
def image.lift (F' : mono_factorisation f) : image f ⟶ F'.I := (image.is_image f).lift F'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma image.lift_fac (F' : mono_factorisation f) : image.lift F' ≫ F'.m = image.ι f :=
(image.is_image f).lift_fac' F'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma image.fac_lift (F' : mono_factorisation f) : factor_thru_image f ≫ image.lift F' = F'.e :=
(image.is_image f).fac_lift F'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma is_image.lift_ι {F : mono_factorisation f} (hF : is_image F) :
hF.lift (image.mono_factorisation f) ≫ image.ι f = F.m :=
hF.lift_fac _
-- TODO we could put a category structure on `mono_factorisation f`,
-- with the morphisms being `g : I ⟶ I'` commuting with the `m`s
-- (they then automatically commute with the `e`s)
-- and show that an `image_of f` gives an initial object there
-- (uniqueness of the lift comes for free).
instance lift_mono (F' : mono_factorisation f) : mono (image.lift F') :=
by { apply mono_of_mono _ F'.m, simpa using mono_factorisation.m_mono _ }
lemma has_image.uniq
(F' : mono_factorisation f) (l : image f ⟶ F'.I) (w : l ≫ F'.m = image.ι f) :
l = image.lift F' :=
(cancel_mono F'.m).1 (by simp [w])
end
section
variables (C)
/-- `has_images` represents a choice of image for every morphism -/
class has_images :=
(has_image : Π {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), has_image f)
attribute [instance, priority 100] has_images.has_image
end
section
variables (f) [has_image f]
/-- The image of a monomorphism is isomorphic to the source. -/
def image_mono_iso_source [mono f] : image f ≅ X :=
is_image.iso_ext (image.is_image f) (is_image.self f)
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma image_mono_iso_source_inv_ι [mono f] : (image_mono_iso_source f).inv ≫ image.ι f = f :=
by simp [image_mono_iso_source]
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma image_mono_iso_source_hom_self [mono f] : (image_mono_iso_source f).hom ≫ f = image.ι f :=
begin
conv { to_lhs, congr, skip, rw ←image_mono_iso_source_inv_ι f, },
rw [←category.assoc, iso.hom_inv_id, category.id_comp],
end
-- This is the proof that `factor_thru_image f` is an epimorphism
-- from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_(category_theory), which is in turn taken from:
-- Mitchell, Barry (1965), Theory of categories, MR 0202787, p.12, Proposition 10.1
@[ext]
lemma image.ext {W : C} {g h : image f ⟶ W} [has_limit (parallel_pair g h)]
(w : factor_thru_image f ≫ g = factor_thru_image f ≫ h) :
g = h :=
begin
let q := equalizer.ι g h,
let e' := equalizer.lift _ w,
let F' : mono_factorisation f :=
{ I := equalizer g h,
m := q ≫ image.ι f,
m_mono := by apply mono_comp,
e := e' },
let v := image.lift F',
have t₀ : v ≫ q ≫ image.ι f = image.ι f := image.lift_fac F',
have t : v ≫ q = 𝟙 (image f) :=
(cancel_mono_id (image.ι f)).1 (by { convert t₀ using 1, rw category.assoc }),
-- The proof from wikipedia next proves `q ≫ v = 𝟙 _`,
-- and concludes that `equalizer g h ≅ image f`,
-- but this isn't necessary.
calc g = 𝟙 (image f) ≫ g : by rw [category.id_comp]
... = v ≫ q ≫ g : by rw [←t, category.assoc]
... = v ≫ q ≫ h : by rw [equalizer.condition g h]
... = 𝟙 (image f) ≫ h : by rw [←category.assoc, t]
... = h : by rw [category.id_comp]
end
instance [Π {Z : C} (g h : image f ⟶ Z), has_limit (parallel_pair g h)] :
epi (factor_thru_image f) :=
⟨λ Z g h w, image.ext f w⟩
lemma epi_image_of_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [has_image f] [E : epi f] : epi (image.ι f) :=
begin
rw ←image.fac f at E,
resetI,
exact epi_of_epi (factor_thru_image f) (image.ι f),
end
lemma epi_of_epi_image {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [has_image f]
[epi (image.ι f)] [epi (factor_thru_image f)] : epi f :=
by { rw [←image.fac f], apply epi_comp, }
end
section
variables {f} {f' : X ⟶ Y} [has_image f] [has_image f']
/--
An equation between morphisms gives a comparison map between the images
(which momentarily we prove is an iso).
-/
def image.eq_to_hom (h : f = f') : image f ⟶ image f' :=
image.lift
{ I := image f',
m := image.ι f',
e := factor_thru_image f', }.
instance (h : f = f') : is_iso (image.eq_to_hom h) :=
{ inv := image.eq_to_hom h.symm,
hom_inv_id' := (cancel_mono (image.ι f)).1 (by simp [image.eq_to_hom]),
inv_hom_id' := (cancel_mono (image.ι f')).1 (by simp [image.eq_to_hom]), }
/-- An equation between morphisms gives an isomorphism between the images. -/
def image.eq_to_iso (h : f = f') : image f ≅ image f' := as_iso (image.eq_to_hom h)
/--
As long as the category has equalizers,
the image inclusion maps commute with `image.eq_to_iso`.
-/
lemma image.eq_fac [has_equalizers C] (h : f = f') :
image.ι f = (image.eq_to_iso h).hom ≫ image.ι f' :=
by { ext, simp [image.eq_to_iso, image.eq_to_hom], }
end
section
variables {Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- The comparison map `image (f ≫ g) ⟶ image g`. -/
def image.pre_comp [has_image g] [has_image (f ≫ g)] : image (f ≫ g) ⟶ image g :=
image.lift
{ I := image g,
m := image.ι g,
e := f ≫ factor_thru_image g }
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma image.factor_thru_image_pre_comp [has_image g] [has_image (f ≫ g)] :
factor_thru_image (f ≫ g) ≫ image.pre_comp f g = f ≫ factor_thru_image g :=
by simp [image.pre_comp]
/--
The two step comparison map
`image (f ≫ (g ≫ h)) ⟶ image (g ≫ h) ⟶ image h`
agrees with the one step comparison map
`image (f ≫ (g ≫ h)) ≅ image ((f ≫ g) ≫ h) ⟶ image h`.
-/
lemma image.pre_comp_comp {W : C} (h : Z ⟶ W)
[has_image (g ≫ h)] [has_image (f ≫ g ≫ h)]
[has_image h] [has_image ((f ≫ g) ≫ h)] :
image.pre_comp f (g ≫ h) ≫ image.pre_comp g h =
image.eq_to_hom (category.assoc f g h).symm ≫ (image.pre_comp (f ≫ g) h) :=
begin
apply (cancel_mono (image.ι h)).1,
simp [image.pre_comp, image.eq_to_hom],
end
variables [has_equalizers C]
/--
`image.pre_comp f g` is an isomorphism when `f` is an isomorphism
(we need `C` to have equalizers to prove this).
-/
instance image.is_iso_precomp_iso (f : X ≅ Y) [has_image g] [has_image (f.hom ≫ g)] :
is_iso (image.pre_comp f.hom g) :=
{ inv := image.lift
{ I := image (f.hom ≫ g),
m := image.ι (f.hom ≫ g),
e := f.inv ≫ factor_thru_image (f.hom ≫ g) },
hom_inv_id' := by { ext, simp [image.pre_comp], },
inv_hom_id' := by { ext, simp [image.pre_comp], }, }
-- Note that in general we don't have the other comparison map you might expect
-- `image f ⟶ image (f ≫ g)`.
/-- Postcomposing by an isomorphism induces an isomorphism on the image. -/
def image.post_comp_is_iso [is_iso g] [has_image f] [has_image (f ≫ g)] :
image f ≅ image (f ≫ g) :=
{ hom := image.lift
{ I := _,
m := image.ι (f ≫ g) ≫ inv g,
m_mono := mono_comp _ _,
e := factor_thru_image (f ≫ g) },
inv := image.lift
{ I := _,
m := image.ι f ≫ g,
m_mono := mono_comp _ _,
e := factor_thru_image f } }
@[simp, reassoc] lemma image.post_comp_is_iso_hom_comp_image_ι [is_iso g] [has_image f]
[has_image (f ≫ g)] : (image.post_comp_is_iso f g).hom ≫ image.ι (f ≫ g) = image.ι f ≫ g :=
by { ext, simp [image.post_comp_is_iso] }
@[simp, reassoc] lemma image.post_comp_is_iso_inv_comp_image_ι [is_iso g] [has_image f]
[has_image (f ≫ g)] : (image.post_comp_is_iso f g).inv ≫ image.ι f = image.ι (f ≫ g) ≫ inv g :=
by { ext, simp [image.post_comp_is_iso] }
end
end category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory.limits
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
section
instance {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [has_image f] : has_image (arrow.mk f).hom :=
show has_image f, by apply_instance
end
section has_image_map
/-- An image map is a morphism `image f → image g` fitting into a commutative square and satisfying
the obvious commutativity conditions. -/
structure image_map {f g : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] [has_image g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g) :=
(map : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom)
(map_ι' : map ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right . obviously)
instance inhabited_image_map {f : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] : inhabited (image_map (𝟙 f)) :=
⟨⟨𝟙 _, by tidy⟩⟩
restate_axiom image_map.map_ι'
attribute [simp, reassoc] image_map.map_ι
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma image_map.factor_map {f g : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] [has_image g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(m : image_map sq) :
factor_thru_image f.hom ≫ m.map = sq.left ≫ factor_thru_image g.hom :=
(cancel_mono (image.ι g.hom)).1 $ by simp
/-- To give an image map for a commutative square with `f` at the top and `g` at the bottom, it
suffices to give a map between any mono factorisation of `f` and any image factorisation of
`g`. -/
def image_map.transport {f g : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] [has_image g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(F : mono_factorisation f.hom) {F' : mono_factorisation g.hom} (hF' : is_image F')
{map : F.I ⟶ F'.I} (map_ι : map ≫ F'.m = F.m ≫ sq.right) : image_map sq :=
{ map := image.lift F ≫ map ≫ hF'.lift (image.mono_factorisation g.hom),
map_ι' := by simp [map_ι] }
/-- `has_image_map sq` means that there is an `image_map` for the square `sq`. -/
class has_image_map {f g : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] [has_image g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g) : Prop :=
mk' :: (has_image_map : nonempty (image_map sq))
lemma has_image_map.mk {f g : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] [has_image g.hom] {sq : f ⟶ g}
(m : image_map sq) : has_image_map sq :=
⟨nonempty.intro m⟩
lemma has_image_map.transport {f g : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] [has_image g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(F : mono_factorisation f.hom) {F' : mono_factorisation g.hom} (hF' : is_image F')
(map : F.I ⟶ F'.I) (map_ι : map ≫ F'.m = F.m ≫ sq.right) : has_image_map sq :=
has_image_map.mk $ image_map.transport sq F hF' map_ι
/-- Obtain an `image_map` from a `has_image_map` instance. -/
def has_image_map.image_map {f g : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] [has_image g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
[has_image_map sq] : image_map sq :=
classical.choice $ @has_image_map.has_image_map _ _ _ _ _ _ sq _
variables {f g : arrow C} [has_image f.hom] [has_image g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
section
local attribute [ext] image_map
instance : subsingleton (image_map sq) :=
subsingleton.intro $ λ a b, image_map.ext a b $ (cancel_mono (image.ι g.hom)).1 $
by simp only [image_map.map_ι]
end
variable [has_image_map sq]
/-- The map on images induced by a commutative square. -/
abbreviation image.map : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom :=
(has_image_map.image_map sq).map
lemma image.factor_map :
factor_thru_image f.hom ≫ image.map sq = sq.left ≫ factor_thru_image g.hom :=
by simp
lemma image.map_ι : image.map sq ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right :=
by simp
lemma image.map_hom_mk'_ι {X Y P Q : C} {k : X ⟶ Y} [has_image k] {l : P ⟶ Q} [has_image l]
{m : X ⟶ P} {n : Y ⟶ Q} (w : m ≫ l = k ≫ n) [has_image_map (arrow.hom_mk' w)] :
image.map (arrow.hom_mk' w) ≫ image.ι l = image.ι k ≫ n :=
image.map_ι _
section
variables {h : arrow C} [has_image h.hom] (sq' : g ⟶ h)
variables [has_image_map sq']
/-- Image maps for composable commutative squares induce an image map in the composite square. -/
def image_map_comp : image_map (sq ≫ sq') :=
{ map := image.map sq ≫ image.map sq' }
@[simp]
lemma image.map_comp [has_image_map (sq ≫ sq')] :
image.map (sq ≫ sq') = image.map sq ≫ image.map sq' :=
show (has_image_map.image_map (sq ≫ sq')).map = (image_map_comp sq sq').map, by congr
end
section
variables (f)
/-- The identity `image f ⟶ image f` fits into the commutative square represented by the identity
morphism `𝟙 f` in the arrow category. -/
def image_map_id : image_map (𝟙 f) :=
{ map := 𝟙 (image f.hom) }
@[simp]
lemma image.map_id [has_image_map (𝟙 f)] : image.map (𝟙 f) = 𝟙 (image f.hom) :=
show (has_image_map.image_map (𝟙 f)).map = (image_map_id f).map, by congr
end
end has_image_map
section
variables (C) [has_images C]
/-- If a category `has_image_maps`, then all commutative squares induce morphisms on images. -/
class has_image_maps :=
(has_image_map : Π {f g : arrow C} (st : f ⟶ g), has_image_map st)
attribute [instance, priority 100] has_image_maps.has_image_map
end
section has_image_maps
variables [has_images C] [has_image_maps C]
/-- The functor from the arrow category of `C` to `C` itself that maps a morphism to its image
and a commutative square to the induced morphism on images. -/
@[simps]
def im : arrow C ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ f, image f.hom,
map := λ _ _ st, image.map st }
end has_image_maps
section strong_epi_mono_factorisation
/-- A strong epi-mono factorisation is a decomposition `f = e ≫ m` with `e` a strong epimorphism
and `m` a monomorphism. -/
structure strong_epi_mono_factorisation {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) extends mono_factorisation f :=
[e_strong_epi : strong_epi e]
attribute [instance] strong_epi_mono_factorisation.e_strong_epi
/-- Satisfying the inhabited linter -/
instance strong_epi_mono_factorisation_inhabited {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [strong_epi f] :
inhabited (strong_epi_mono_factorisation f) :=
⟨⟨⟨Y, 𝟙 Y, f, by simp⟩⟩⟩
/-- A mono factorisation coming from a strong epi-mono factorisation always has the universal
property of the image. -/
def strong_epi_mono_factorisation.to_mono_is_image {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(F : strong_epi_mono_factorisation f) : is_image F.to_mono_factorisation :=
{ lift := λ G, arrow.lift $ arrow.hom_mk' $
show G.e ≫ G.m = F.e ≫ F.m, by rw [F.to_mono_factorisation.fac, G.fac] }
variable (C)
/-- A category has strong epi-mono factorisations if every morphism admits a strong epi-mono
factorisation. -/
class has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations : Prop :=
mk' :: (has_fac : Π {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), nonempty (strong_epi_mono_factorisation f))
variable {C}
lemma has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations.mk
(d : Π {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), strong_epi_mono_factorisation f) :
has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations C :=
⟨λ X Y f, nonempty.intro $ d f⟩
@[priority 100]
instance has_images_of_has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations
[has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations C] : has_images C :=
{ has_image := λ X Y f,
let F' := classical.choice (has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations.has_fac f) in
has_image.mk { F := F'.to_mono_factorisation,
is_image := F'.to_mono_is_image } }
end strong_epi_mono_factorisation
section has_strong_epi_images
variables (C) [has_images C]
/-- A category has strong epi images if it has all images and `factor_thru_image f` is a strong
epimorphism for all `f`. -/
class has_strong_epi_images : Prop :=
(strong_factor_thru_image : Π {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), strong_epi (factor_thru_image f))
attribute [instance] has_strong_epi_images.strong_factor_thru_image
end has_strong_epi_images
section has_strong_epi_images
/-- If there is a single strong epi-mono factorisation of `f`, then every image factorisation is a
strong epi-mono factorisation. -/
lemma strong_epi_of_strong_epi_mono_factorisation {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(F : strong_epi_mono_factorisation f) {F' : mono_factorisation f} (hF' : is_image F') :
strong_epi F'.e :=
by { rw ←is_image.e_iso_ext_hom F.to_mono_is_image hF', apply strong_epi_comp }
lemma strong_epi_factor_thru_image_of_strong_epi_mono_factorisation {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
[has_image f] (F : strong_epi_mono_factorisation f) : strong_epi (factor_thru_image f) :=
strong_epi_of_strong_epi_mono_factorisation F $ image.is_image f
/-- If we constructed our images from strong epi-mono factorisations, then these images are
strong epi images. -/
@[priority 100]
instance has_strong_epi_images_of_has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations
[has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations C] : has_strong_epi_images C :=
{ strong_factor_thru_image := λ X Y f,
strong_epi_factor_thru_image_of_strong_epi_mono_factorisation $
classical.choice $ has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations.has_fac f }
end has_strong_epi_images
section has_strong_epi_images
variables [has_images C]
/-- A category with strong epi images has image maps. -/
@[priority 100]
instance has_image_maps_of_has_strong_epi_images [has_strong_epi_images C] :
has_image_maps C :=
{ has_image_map := λ f g st, has_image_map.mk
{ map := arrow.lift $ arrow.hom_mk' $ show (st.left ≫ factor_thru_image g.hom) ≫ image.ι g.hom =
factor_thru_image f.hom ≫ (image.ι f.hom ≫ st.right), by simp } }
/-- If a category has images, equalizers and pullbacks, then images are automatically strong epi
images. -/
@[priority 100]
instance has_strong_epi_images_of_has_pullbacks_of_has_equalizers [has_pullbacks C]
[has_equalizers C] : has_strong_epi_images C :=
{ strong_factor_thru_image := λ X Y f,
{ epi := by apply_instance,
has_lift := λ A B x y h h_mono w, arrow.has_lift.mk
{ lift := image.lift
{ I := pullback h y,
m := pullback.snd ≫ image.ι f,
m_mono := by exactI mono_comp _ _,
e := pullback.lift _ _ w } ≫ pullback.fst,
fac_left := by simp,
fac_right := by tidy } } }
end has_strong_epi_images
variables [has_strong_epi_mono_factorisations.{v} C]
variables {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
/--
If `C` has strong epi mono factorisations, then the image is unique up to isomorphism, in that if
`f` factors as a strong epi followed by a mono, this factorisation is essentially the image
factorisation.
-/
def image.iso_strong_epi_mono {I' : C} (e : X ⟶ I') (m : I' ⟶ Y) (comm : e ≫ m = f) [strong_epi e]
[mono m] :
I' ≅ image f :=
is_image.iso_ext {strong_epi_mono_factorisation . I := I', m := m, e := e}.to_mono_is_image $
image.is_image f
@[simp]
lemma image.iso_strong_epi_mono_hom_comp_ι {I' : C} (e : X ⟶ I') (m : I' ⟶ Y) (comm : e ≫ m = f)
[strong_epi e] [mono m] :
(image.iso_strong_epi_mono e m comm).hom ≫ image.ι f = m :=
is_image.lift_fac _ _
@[simp]
lemma image.iso_strong_epi_mono_inv_comp_mono {I' : C} (e : X ⟶ I') (m : I' ⟶ Y) (comm : e ≫ m = f)
[strong_epi e] [mono m] :
(image.iso_strong_epi_mono e m comm).inv ≫ m = image.ι f :=
image.lift_fac _
end category_theory.limits
|
d438a25dcd4887bb59357c733625c36fb77bf81e | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/ring/ulift.lean | d80b70875968eb8ab2ae4de1716ba464733f3a55 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,030 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.group.ulift
import data.equiv.ring
/-!
# `ulift` instances for ring
This file defines instances for ring, semiring and related structures on `ulift` types.
(Recall `ulift α` is just a "copy" of a type `α` in a higher universe.)
We also provide `ulift.ring_equiv : ulift R ≃+* R`.
-/
universes u v
variables {α : Type u} {x y : ulift.{v} α}
namespace ulift
instance mul_zero_class [mul_zero_class α] : mul_zero_class (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance distrib [distrib α] : distrib (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { add := (+), mul := (*), .. }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance non_unital_non_assoc_semiring [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] :
non_unital_non_assoc_semiring (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), add := (+), mul := (*),
nsmul := λ n f, ⟨nsmul n f.down⟩, };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance non_assoc_semiring [non_assoc_semiring α] : non_assoc_semiring (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), one := 1, add := (+), mul := (*),
nsmul := λ n f, ⟨nsmul n f.down⟩ };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance non_unital_semiring [non_unital_semiring α] : non_unital_semiring (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), add := (+), mul := (*),
nsmul := λ n f, ⟨nsmul n f.down⟩, };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance semiring [semiring α] : semiring (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), one := 1, add := (+), mul := (*),
nsmul := λ n f, ⟨nsmul n f.down⟩, npow := λ n f, ⟨npow n f.down⟩ };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
/--
The ring equivalence between `ulift α` and `α`.
-/
def ring_equiv [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] : ulift α ≃+* α :=
{ to_fun := ulift.down,
inv_fun := ulift.up,
map_mul' := λ x y, rfl,
map_add' := λ x y, rfl,
left_inv := by tidy,
right_inv := by tidy, }
instance comm_semiring [comm_semiring α] : comm_semiring (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), one := 1, add := (+), mul := (*),
nsmul := λ n f, ⟨nsmul n f.down⟩, npow := λ n f, ⟨npow n f.down⟩ };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance ring [ring α] : ring (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), one := 1, add := (+), mul := (*), sub := has_sub.sub,
neg := has_neg.neg, nsmul := λ n f, ⟨nsmul n f.down⟩, npow := λ n f, ⟨npow n f.down⟩,
gsmul := λ n f, ⟨gsmul n f.down⟩ };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance comm_ring [comm_ring α] : comm_ring (ulift α) :=
by refine_struct { zero := (0 : ulift α), one := 1, add := (+), mul := (*), sub := has_sub.sub,
neg := has_neg.neg, nsmul := λ n f, ⟨nsmul n f.down⟩, npow := λ n f, ⟨npow n f.down⟩,
gsmul := λ n f, ⟨gsmul n f.down⟩ };
tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
end ulift
|
e139f0ea621b3010569c15e47712e89c2b4050f8 | 022547453607c6244552158ff25ab3bf17361760 | /src/analysis/specific_limits.lean | 82f1f3e54bfe021b08fa824666abf1ab06aa82b0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 1293045656/mathlib | 5f81741a7c1ff1873440ec680b3680bfb6b7b048 | 4709e61525a60189733e72a50e564c58d534bed8 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,010,200,553 | 1,626,245,646,000 | 1,626,245,646,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,810 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.geom_sum
import order.filter.archimedean
import order.iterate
import topology.instances.ennreal
import tactic.ring_exp
import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical set function filter finset metric asymptotics
open_locale classical topological_space nat big_operators uniformity nnreal ennreal
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
lemma tendsto_norm_at_top_at_top : tendsto (norm : ℝ → ℝ) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_abs_at_top_at_top
lemma summable_of_absolute_convergence_real {f : ℕ → ℝ} :
(∃r, tendsto (λn, (∑ i in range n, abs (f i))) at_top (𝓝 r)) → summable f
| ⟨r, hr⟩ :=
begin
refine summable_of_summable_norm ⟨r, (has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg _ _).2 _⟩,
exact assume i, norm_nonneg _,
simpa only using hr
end
lemma tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_at_top_zero.comp tendsto_coe_nat_at_top_at_top
lemma tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat (C : ℝ) : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, C / n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa only [mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat
lemma nnreal.tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw ← nnreal.tendsto_coe, convert tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat, simp }
lemma nnreal.tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat (C : ℝ≥0) :
tendsto (λ n : ℕ, C / n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.mul nnreal.tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat
lemma tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat :
tendsto (λ n : ℕ, 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
suffices tendsto (λ n : ℕ, 1 / (↑(n + 1) : ℝ)) at_top (𝓝 0), by simpa,
(tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat 1).2 (tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat 1)
/-! ### Powers -/
lemma tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos [linear_ordered_semiring α] [archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 0 < r) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, (r + 1)^n) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone' (λ n m, pow_le_pow (le_add_of_nonneg_left (le_of_lt h))) $
not_bdd_above_iff.2 $ λ x, set.exists_range_iff.2 $ add_one_pow_unbounded_of_pos _ h
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt [linear_ordered_ring α] [archimedean α]
{r : α} (h : 1 < r) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) at_top at_top :=
sub_add_cancel r 1 ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos (sub_pos.2 h)
lemma nat.tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt {m : ℕ} (h : 1 < m) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, m ^ n) at_top at_top :=
nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_lt h) ▸
tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos (nat.sub_pos_of_lt h)
lemma tendsto_norm_zero' {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_group 𝕜] :
tendsto (norm : 𝕜 → ℝ) (𝓝[{x | x ≠ 0}] 0) (𝓝[set.Ioi 0] 0) :=
tendsto_norm_zero.inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ λ x hx, norm_pos_iff.2 hx
lemma normed_field.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhds_within_0_at_top {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] :
tendsto (λ x:𝕜, ∥x⁻¹∥) (𝓝[{x | x ≠ 0}] 0) at_top :=
(tendsto_inv_zero_at_top.comp tendsto_norm_zero').congr $ λ x, (normed_field.norm_inv x).symm
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {𝕜 : Type*} [linear_ordered_field 𝕜] [archimedean 𝕜]
[topological_space 𝕜] [order_topology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
h₁.eq_or_lt.elim
(assume : 0 = r,
(tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat 1).mp $ by simp [pow_succ, ← this, tendsto_const_nhds])
(assume : 0 < r,
have tendsto (λn, (r⁻¹ ^ n)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0),
from tendsto_inv_at_top_zero.comp
(tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt $ one_lt_inv this h₂),
this.congr (λ n, by simp))
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_within_0_of_lt_1 {𝕜 : Type*} [linear_ordered_field 𝕜] [archimedean 𝕜]
[topological_space 𝕜] [order_topology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 < r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝[Ioi 0] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 h₁.le h₂,
tendsto_principal.2 $ eventually_of_forall $ λ n, pow_pos h₁ _⟩
lemma is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ < r₂) :
is_o (λ n : ℕ, r₁ ^ n) (λ n, r₂ ^ n) at_top :=
have H : 0 < r₂ := h₁.trans_lt h₂,
is_o_of_tendsto (λ n hn, false.elim $ H.ne' $ pow_eq_zero hn) $
(tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 (div_nonneg h₁ (h₁.trans h₂.le)) ((div_lt_one H).2 h₂)).congr
(λ n, div_pow _ _ _)
lemma is_O_pow_pow_of_le_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
is_O (λ n : ℕ, r₁ ^ n) (λ n, r₂ ^ n) at_top :=
h₂.eq_or_lt.elim (λ h, h ▸ is_O_refl _ _) (λ h, (is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h).is_O)
lemma is_o_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : abs r₁ < abs r₂) :
is_o (λ n : ℕ, r₁ ^ n) (λ n, r₂ ^ n) at_top :=
begin
refine (is_o.of_norm_left _).of_norm_right,
exact (is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left (abs_nonneg r₁) h).congr (pow_abs r₁) (pow_abs r₂)
end
/-- Various statements equivalent to the fact that `f n` grows exponentially slower than `R ^ n`.
* 0: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 1: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 2: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 3: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 4: there exist `a < R` and `C` such that one of `C` and `R` is positive and $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$
for all `n`;
* 5: there exists `0 < a < R` and a positive `C` such that $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$ for all `n`;
* 6: there exists `a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`;
* 7: there exists `0 < a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`.
NB: For backwards compatibility, if you add more items to the list, please append them at the end of
the list. -/
lemma tfae_exists_lt_is_o_pow (f : ℕ → ℝ) (R : ℝ) :
tfae [∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, is_o f (pow a) at_top,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, is_o f (pow a) at_top,
∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, is_O f (pow a) at_top,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, is_O f (pow a) at_top,
∃ (a < R) C (h₀ : 0 < C ∨ 0 < R), ∀ n, abs (f n) ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ (a ∈ Ioo 0 R) (C > 0), ∀ n, abs (f n) ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ a < R, ∀ᶠ n in at_top, abs (f n) ≤ a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∀ᶠ n in at_top, abs (f n) ≤ a ^ n] :=
begin
have A : Ico 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R,
from λ x hx, ⟨(neg_lt_zero.2 (hx.1.trans_lt hx.2)).trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩,
have B : Ioo 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R := subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self A,
-- First we prove that 1-4 are equivalent using 2 → 3 → 4, 1 → 3, and 2 → 1
tfae_have : 1 → 3, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, ha, H.is_O⟩,
tfae_have : 2 → 1, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, B ha, H⟩,
tfae_have : 3 → 2,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
rcases exists_between (abs_lt.2 ha) with ⟨b, hab, hbR⟩,
exact ⟨b, ⟨(abs_nonneg a).trans_lt hab, hbR⟩,
H.trans_is_o (is_o_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left (hab.trans_le (le_abs_self b)))⟩ },
tfae_have : 2 → 4, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, ha, H.is_O⟩,
tfae_have : 4 → 3, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, B ha, H⟩,
-- Add 5 and 6 using 4 → 6 → 5 → 3
tfae_have : 4 → 6,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
rcases bound_of_is_O_nat_at_top H with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩,
refine ⟨a, ha, C, hC₀, λ n, _⟩,
simpa only [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg ha.1.le]
using hC (pow_ne_zero n ha.1.ne') },
tfae_have : 6 → 5, from λ ⟨a, ha, C, H₀, H⟩, ⟨a, ha.2, C, or.inl H₀, H⟩,
tfae_have : 5 → 3,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, C, h₀, H⟩,
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg (λ n, (abs_nonneg _).trans (H n)) with rfl | ⟨hC₀, ha₀⟩,
{ obtain rfl : f = 0, by { ext n, simpa using H n },
simp only [lt_irrefl, false_or] at h₀,
exact ⟨0, ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 h₀, h₀⟩, is_O_zero _ _⟩ },
exact ⟨a, A ⟨ha₀, ha⟩,
is_O_of_le' _ (λ n, (H n).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_abs_self _) hC₀.le)⟩ },
-- Add 7 and 8 using 2 → 8 → 7 → 3
tfae_have : 2 → 8,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
refine ⟨a, ha, (H.def zero_lt_one).mono (λ n hn, _)⟩,
rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_pos ha.1] at hn },
tfae_have : 8 → 7, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, ha.2, H⟩,
tfae_have : 7 → 3,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
have : 0 ≤ a, from nonneg_of_eventually_pow_nonneg (H.mono $ λ n, (abs_nonneg _).trans),
refine ⟨a, A ⟨this, ha⟩, is_O.of_bound 1 _⟩,
simpa only [real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg this] },
tfae_finish
end
lemma uniformity_basis_dist_pow_of_lt_1 {α : Type*} [pseudo_metric_space α]
{r : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < r) (h₁ : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).has_basis (λ k : ℕ, true) (λ k, {p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ k}) :=
metric.mk_uniformity_basis (λ i _, pow_pos h₀ _) $ λ ε ε0,
(exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h₁).imp $ λ k hk, ⟨trivial, hk.le⟩
lemma geom_lt {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, c * u k < u (k + 1)) :
c ^ n * u 0 < u n :=
begin
refine (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt hn _ _ h,
{ simp },
{ simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, le_refl] }
end
lemma geom_le {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, c * u k ≤ u (k + 1)) :
c ^ n * u 0 ≤ u n :=
by refine (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ _ h; simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, le_refl]
lemma lt_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) < c * u k) :
u n < c ^ n * u 0 :=
begin
refine (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le hn _ h _,
{ simp },
{ simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, le_refl] }
end
lemma le_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) ≤ c * u k) :
u n ≤ (c ^ n) * u 0 :=
by refine (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ h _; simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, le_refl]
/-- For any natural `k` and a real `r > 1` we have `n ^ k = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
lemma is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
is_o (λ n, n ^ k : ℕ → R) (λ n, r ^ n) at_top :=
begin
have : tendsto (λ x : ℝ, x ^ k) (𝓝[Ioi 1] 1) (𝓝 1),
from ((continuous_id.pow k).tendsto' (1 : ℝ) 1 (one_pow _)).mono_left inf_le_left,
obtain ⟨r' : ℝ, hr' : r' ^ k < r, h1 : 1 < r'⟩ :=
((this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hr)).and self_mem_nhds_within).exists,
have h0 : 0 ≤ r' := zero_le_one.trans h1.le,
suffices : is_O _ (λ n : ℕ, (r' ^ k) ^ n) at_top,
from this.trans_is_o (is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left (pow_nonneg h0 _) hr'),
conv in ((r' ^ _) ^ _) { rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul] },
suffices : ∀ n : ℕ, ∥(n : R)∥ ≤ (r' - 1)⁻¹ * ∥(1 : R)∥ * ∥r' ^ n∥,
from (is_O_of_le' _ this).pow _,
intro n, rw mul_right_comm,
refine n.norm_cast_le.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (norm_nonneg _)),
simpa [div_eq_inv_mul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h0] using n.cast_le_pow_div_sub h1
end
/-- For a real `r > 1` we have `n = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
lemma is_o_coe_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
is_o (coe : ℕ → R) (λ n, r ^ n) at_top :=
by simpa only [pow_one] using is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt 1 hr
/-- If `∥r₁∥ < r₂`, then for any naturak `k` we have `n ^ k r₁ ^ n = o (r₂ ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
lemma is_o_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] (k : ℕ)
{r₁ : R} {r₂ : ℝ} (h : ∥r₁∥ < r₂) :
is_o (λ n, n ^ k * r₁ ^ n : ℕ → R) (λ n, r₂ ^ n) at_top :=
begin
by_cases h0 : r₁ = 0,
{ refine (is_o_zero _ _).congr' (mem_at_top_sets.2 $ ⟨1, λ n hn, _⟩) eventually_eq.rfl,
simp [zero_pow (zero_lt_one.trans_le hn), h0] },
rw [← ne.def, ← norm_pos_iff] at h0,
have A : is_o (λ n, n ^ k : ℕ → R) (λ n, (r₂ / ∥r₁∥) ^ n) at_top,
from is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k ((one_lt_div h0).2 h),
suffices : is_O (λ n, r₁ ^ n) (λ n, ∥r₁∥ ^ n) at_top,
by simpa [div_mul_cancel _ (pow_pos h0 _).ne'] using A.mul_is_O this,
exact is_O.of_bound 1 (by simpa using eventually_norm_pow_le r₁)
end
lemma tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
tendsto (λ n, n ^ k / r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
(is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr).tendsto_0
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`. -/
lemma tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : abs r < 1) :
tendsto (λ n, n ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
by_cases h0 : r = 0,
{ exact tendsto_const_nhds.congr'
(mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨1, λ n hn, by simp [zero_lt_one.trans_le hn, h0]⟩) },
have hr' : 1 < (abs r)⁻¹, from one_lt_inv (abs_pos.2 h0) hr,
rw tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr'
end
/-- If a sequence `v` of real numbers satisfies `k * v n ≤ v (n+1)` with `1 < k`,
then it goes to +∞. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_geom_le {v : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < v 0) (hc : 1 < c)
(hu : ∀ n, c * v n ≤ v (n + 1)) : tendsto v at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_mono (λ n, geom_le (zero_le_one.trans hc.le) n (λ k hk, hu k)) $
(tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt hc).at_top_mul_const h₀
lemma nnreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
nnreal.tendsto_coe.1 $ by simp only [nnreal.coe_pow, nnreal.coe_zero,
tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 r.coe_nonneg hr]
lemma ennreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < 1) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩,
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero],
norm_cast at *,
apply nnreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 hr
end
/-- In a normed ring, the powers of an element x with `∥x∥ < 1` tend to zero. -/
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] {x : R}
(h : ∥x∥ < 1) : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), x ^ n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
apply squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_norm_pow_le x),
exact tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h,
end
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : abs r < 1) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h
/-! ### Geometric series-/
section geometric
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
has_sum (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
have r ≠ 1, from ne_of_lt h₂,
have tendsto (λn, (r ^ n - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹)),
from ((tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds,
have (λ n, (∑ i in range n, r ^ i)) = (λ n, geom_sum r n) := rfl,
(has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg h₁) _).mpr $
by simp [neg_inv, geom_sum_eq, div_eq_mul_inv, *] at *
lemma summable_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : ∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂).tsum_eq
lemma has_sum_geometric_two : has_sum (λn:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n) 2 :=
by convert has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 _ _; norm_num
lemma summable_geometric_two : summable (λn:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_two⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_two : ∑'n:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n = 2 :=
has_sum_geometric_two.tsum_eq
lemma sum_geometric_two_le (n : ℕ) : ∑ (i : ℕ) in range n, (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i ≤ 2 :=
begin
have : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i,
{ intro i, apply pow_nonneg, norm_num },
convert sum_le_tsum (range n) (λ i _, this i) summable_geometric_two,
exact tsum_geometric_two.symm
end
lemma has_sum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2 ^ n) a :=
begin
convert has_sum.mul_left (a / 2) (has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1
(le_of_lt one_half_pos) one_half_lt_one),
{ funext n, simp, refl, },
{ norm_num }
end
lemma summable_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : summable (λ n:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2 ^ n) :=
⟨a, has_sum_geometric_two' a⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : ∑' n:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2^n = a :=
(has_sum_geometric_two' a).tsum_eq
/-- **Sum of a Geometric Series** -/
lemma nnreal.has_sum_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) :
has_sum (λ n : ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
begin
apply nnreal.has_sum_coe.1,
push_cast,
rw [nnreal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hr)],
exact has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 r.coe_nonneg hr
end
lemma nnreal.summable_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
⟨_, nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_nnreal {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : ∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr).tsum_eq
/-- The series `pow r` converges to `(1-r)⁻¹`. For `r < 1` the RHS is a finite number,
and for `1 ≤ r` the RHS equals `∞`. -/
@[simp] lemma ennreal.tsum_geometric (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
begin
cases lt_or_le r 1 with hr hr,
{ rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩,
norm_cast at *,
convert ennreal.tsum_coe_eq (nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr),
rw [ennreal.coe_inv $ ne_of_gt $ nnreal.sub_pos.2 hr] },
{ rw [ennreal.sub_eq_zero_of_le hr, ennreal.inv_zero, ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat, supr_eq_top],
refine λ a ha, (ennreal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ha)).imp
(λ n hn, lt_of_lt_of_le hn _),
have : ∀ k:ℕ, 1 ≤ r^k, by simpa using canonically_ordered_semiring.pow_le_pow_of_le_left hr,
calc (n:ℝ≥0∞) = (∑ i in range n, 1) : by rw [sum_const, nsmul_one, card_range]
... ≤ ∑ i in range n, r ^ i : sum_le_sum (λ k _, this k) }
end
variables {K : Type*} [normed_field K] {ξ : K}
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, ξ ^ n) (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
begin
have xi_ne_one : ξ ≠ 1, by { contrapose! h, simp [h] },
have A : tendsto (λn, (ξ ^ n - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹)),
from ((tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds,
have B : (λ n, (∑ i in range n, ξ ^ i)) = (λ n, geom_sum ξ n) := rfl,
rw [has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm, B],
{ simpa [geom_sum_eq, xi_ne_one, neg_inv, div_eq_mul_inv] using A },
{ simp [normed_field.norm_pow, summable_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h] }
end
lemma summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, ξ ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : ∑'n:ℕ, ξ ^ n = (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
(has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h).tsum_eq
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : abs r < 1) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
lemma summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : abs r < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
lemma tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : abs r < 1) : ∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
/-- A geometric series in a normed field is summable iff the norm of the common ratio is less than
one. -/
@[simp] lemma summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_1 : summable (λ n : ℕ, ξ ^ n) ↔ ∥ξ∥ < 1 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1⟩,
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : dist (ξ ^ k) 0 < 1⟩ :=
(h.tendsto_cofinite_zero.eventually (ball_mem_nhds _ zero_lt_one)).exists,
simp only [normed_field.norm_pow, dist_zero_right] at hk,
rw [← one_pow k] at hk,
exact lt_of_pow_lt_pow _ zero_le_one hk
end
end geometric
section mul_geometric
lemma summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 {R : Type*} [normed_ring R]
(k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ∥r∥ < 1) : summable (λ n : ℕ, ∥(n ^ k * r ^ n : R)∥) :=
begin
rcases exists_between hr with ⟨r', hrr', h⟩,
exact summable_of_is_O_nat _ (summable_geometric_of_lt_1 ((norm_nonneg _).trans hrr'.le) h)
(is_o_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt _ hrr').is_O.norm_left
end
lemma summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] [complete_space R]
(k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ∥r∥ < 1) : summable (λ n, n ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → R) :=
summable_of_summable_norm $ summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 _ hr
/-- If `∥r∥ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`, `has_sum` version. -/
lemma has_sum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [complete_space 𝕜]
{r : 𝕜} (hr : ∥r∥ < 1) : has_sum (λ n, n * r ^ n : ℕ → 𝕜) (r / (1 - r) ^ 2) :=
begin
have A : summable (λ n, n * r ^ n : ℕ → 𝕜),
by simpa using summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 1 hr,
have B : has_sum (pow r : ℕ → 𝕜) (1 - r)⁻¹, from has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 hr,
refine A.has_sum_iff.2 _,
have hr' : r ≠ 1, by { rintro rfl, simpa [lt_irrefl] using hr },
set s : 𝕜 := ∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n,
calc s = (1 - r) * s / (1 - r) : (mul_div_cancel_left _ (sub_ne_zero.2 hr'.symm)).symm
... = (s - r * s) / (1 - r) : by rw [sub_mul, one_mul]
... = ((0 : ℕ) * r ^ 0 + (∑' n : ℕ, (n + 1) * r ^ (n + 1)) - r * s) / (1 - r) :
by { congr, exact tsum_eq_zero_add A }
... = (r * (∑' n : ℕ, (n + 1) * r ^ n) - r * s) / (1 - r) :
by simp [pow_succ, mul_left_comm _ r, tsum_mul_left]
... = r / (1 - r) ^ 2 :
by simp [add_mul, tsum_add A B.summable, mul_add, B.tsum_eq, ← div_eq_mul_inv, sq,
div_div_eq_div_mul]
end
/-- If `∥r∥ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`. -/
lemma tsum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [complete_space 𝕜]
{r : 𝕜} (hr : ∥r∥ < 1) :
(∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n : 𝕜) = (r / (1 - r) ^ 2) :=
(has_sum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 hr).tsum_eq
end mul_geometric
/-!
### Sequences with geometrically decaying distance in metric spaces
In this paragraph, we discuss sequences in metric spaces or emetric spaces for which the distance
between two consecutive terms decays geometrically. We show that such sequences are Cauchy
sequences, and bound their distances to the limit. We also discuss series with geometrically
decaying terms.
-/
section edist_le_geometric
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] (r C : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r < 1) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, edist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C * r^n)
include hr hC hu
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `C ≠ ∞`, `r < 1`,
then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.-/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
refine cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top _ hu _,
rw [ennreal.tsum_mul_left, ennreal.tsum_geometric],
refine ennreal.mul_ne_top hC (ennreal.inv_ne_top.2 _),
exact ne_of_gt (ennreal.zero_lt_sub_iff_lt.2 hr)
end
omit hr hC
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ (C * r^n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
convert edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ha _,
simp only [pow_add, ennreal.tsum_mul_left, ennreal.tsum_geometric, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) :=
by simpa only [pow_zero, mul_one] using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hu ha 0
end edist_le_geometric
section edist_le_geometric_two
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] (C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, edist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C / 2^n) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a))
include hC hu
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.-/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric_two : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.inv_pow] at hu,
refine cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric 2⁻¹ C _ hC hu,
simp [ennreal.one_lt_two]
end
omit hC
include ha
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C * 2^-n`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ 2 * C / 2^n :=
begin
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.inv_pow] at *,
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm],
convert edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto 2⁻¹ C hu ha n,
rw [ennreal.one_sub_inv_two, ennreal.inv_inv]
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀: edist (f 0) a ≤ 2 * C :=
by simpa only [pow_zero, div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.inv_one, mul_one]
using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto C hu ha 0
end edist_le_geometric_two
section le_geometric
variables [pseudo_metric_space α] {r C : ℝ} (hr : r < 1) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, dist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C * r^n)
include hr hu
lemma aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric : has_sum (λ n : ℕ, C * r^n) (C / (1 - r)) :=
begin
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg (λ n, dist_nonneg.trans (hu n)) with rfl | ⟨C₀, r₀⟩,
{ simp [has_sum_zero] },
{ refine has_sum.mul_left C _,
simpa using has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 r₀ hr }
end
variables (r C)
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.
Note that this lemma does not assume `0 ≤ C` or `0 ≤ r`. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric : cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ hu ⟨_, aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu⟩
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) :=
(aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu).tsum_eq ▸
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ _ hu ⟨_, aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu⟩ ha
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ (C * r^n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
have := aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu,
convert dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ⟨_, this⟩ ha n,
simp only [pow_add, mul_left_comm C, mul_div_right_comm],
rw [mul_comm],
exact (this.mul_left _).tsum_eq.symm
end
omit hr hu
variable (hu₂ : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ (C / 2) / 2^n)
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric_two : cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ hu₂ $ ⟨_, has_sum_geometric_two' C⟩
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ C :=
(tsum_geometric_two' C) ▸ dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ _ hu₂ (summable_geometric_two' C) ha
include hu₂
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / 2^n`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ C / 2^n :=
begin
convert dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto _ hu₂ (summable_geometric_two' C) ha n,
simp only [add_comm n, pow_add, ← div_div_eq_div_mul],
symmetry,
exact ((has_sum_geometric_two' C).div_const _).tsum_eq
end
end le_geometric
section summable_le_geometric
variables [semi_normed_group α] {r C : ℝ} {f : ℕ → α}
lemma semi_normed_group.cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric {C : ℝ} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1)
{u : ℕ → α} (h : ∀ n, ∥u n - u (n + 1)∥ ≤ C*r^n) : cauchy_seq u :=
cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric r C hr (by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using h)
lemma dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ i in range n, f i) (∑ i in range (n+1), f i) ≤ C * r ^ n :=
begin
rw [sum_range_succ, dist_eq_norm, ← norm_neg, neg_sub, add_sub_cancel'],
exact hf n,
end
/-- If `∥f n∥ ≤ C * r ^ n` for all `n : ℕ` and some `r < 1`, then the partial sums of `f` form a
Cauchy sequence. This lemma does not assume `0 ≤ r` or `0 ≤ C`. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_geometric_bound (hr : r < 1) (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n) :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset (ℕ), ∑ x in s, f x) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _
(aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr (dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric hf)).summable hf
/-- If `∥f n∥ ≤ C * r ^ n` for all `n : ℕ` and some `r < 1`, then the partial sums of `f` are within
distance `C * r ^ n / (1 - r)` of the sum of the series. This lemma does not assume `0 ≤ r` or
`0 ≤ C`. -/
lemma norm_sub_le_of_geometric_bound_of_has_sum (hr : r < 1) (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n)
{a : α} (ha : has_sum f a) (n : ℕ) :
∥(∑ x in finset.range n, f x) - a∥ ≤ (C * r ^ n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
rw ← dist_eq_norm,
apply dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hr (dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric hf),
exact ha.tendsto_sum_nat
end
@[simp] lemma dist_partial_sum (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) (∑ k in range n, u k) = ∥u n∥ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm, sum_range_succ]
@[simp] lemma dist_partial_sum' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ k in range n, u k) (∑ k in range (n+1), u k) = ∥u n∥ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm', sum_range_succ]
lemma cauchy_series_of_le_geometric {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α}
{r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1) (h : ∀ n, ∥u n∥ ≤ C*r^n) : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range n, u k) :=
cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric r C hr (by simp [h])
lemma normed_group.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric' {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n, ∥u n∥ ≤ C*r^n) : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) :=
begin
by_cases hC : C = 0,
{ subst hC,
simp at h,
exact cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric 0 0 zero_lt_one (by simp [h]) },
have : 0 ≤ C,
{ simpa using (norm_nonneg _).trans (h 0) },
replace hC : 0 < C,
from (ne.symm hC).le_iff_lt.mp this,
have : 0 ≤ r,
{ have := (norm_nonneg _).trans (h 1),
rw pow_one at this,
exact (zero_le_mul_left hC).mp this },
simp_rw finset.sum_range_succ_comm,
have : cauchy_seq u,
{ apply tendsto.cauchy_seq,
apply squeeze_zero_norm h,
rw show 0 = C*0, by simp,
exact tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 this hr) },
exact this.add (cauchy_series_of_le_geometric hr h),
end
lemma normed_group.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric'' {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α} {N : ℕ} {r : ℝ}
(hr₀ : 0 < r) (hr₁ : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n ≥ N, ∥u n∥ ≤ C*r^n) : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) :=
begin
set v : ℕ → α := λ n, if n < N then 0 else u n,
have hC : 0 ≤ C,
from (zero_le_mul_right $ pow_pos hr₀ N).mp ((norm_nonneg _).trans $ h N $ le_refl N),
have : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = v n,
{ intros n hn,
simp [v, hn, if_neg (not_lt.mpr hn)] },
refine cauchy_seq_sum_of_eventually_eq this (normed_group.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric' hr₁ _),
{ exact C },
intro n,
dsimp [v],
split_ifs with H H,
{ rw norm_zero,
exact mul_nonneg hC (pow_nonneg hr₀.le _) },
{ push_neg at H,
exact h _ H }
end
end summable_le_geometric
section normed_ring_geometric
variables {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] [complete_space R]
open normed_space
/-- A geometric series in a complete normed ring is summable.
Proved above (same name, different namespace) for not-necessarily-complete normed fields. -/
lemma normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1
(x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) : summable (λ (n:ℕ), x ^ n) :=
begin
have h1 : summable (λ (n:ℕ), ∥x∥ ^ n) := summable_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually _ h1 _,
rw nat.cofinite_eq_at_top,
exact eventually_norm_pow_le x,
end
/-- Bound for the sum of a geometric series in a normed ring. This formula does not assume that the
normed ring satisfies the axiom `∥1∥ = 1`. -/
lemma normed_ring.tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1
(x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) : ∥∑' n:ℕ, x ^ n∥ ≤ ∥(1:R)∥ - 1 + (1 - ∥x∥)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw tsum_eq_zero_add (normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h),
simp only [pow_zero],
refine le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) _,
have : ∥∑' b : ℕ, (λ n, x ^ (n + 1)) b∥ ≤ (1 - ∥x∥)⁻¹ - 1,
{ refine tsum_of_norm_bounded _ (λ b, norm_pow_le' _ (nat.succ_pos b)),
convert (has_sum_nat_add_iff' 1).mpr (has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg x) h),
simp },
linarith
end
lemma geom_series_mul_neg (x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) :
(∑' i:ℕ, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 :=
begin
have := ((normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h).has_sum.mul_right (1 - x)),
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat _,
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 1 - x ^ n) at_top (𝓝 1),
{ simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub (tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h) },
convert ← this,
ext n,
rw [←geom_sum_mul_neg, geom_sum_def, finset.sum_mul],
end
lemma mul_neg_geom_series (x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) :
(1 - x) * ∑' i:ℕ, x ^ i = 1 :=
begin
have := (normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h).has_sum.mul_left (1 - x),
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat _,
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 1 - x ^ n) at_top (nhds 1),
{ simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub
(tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h) },
convert ← this,
ext n,
rw [←mul_neg_geom_sum, geom_sum_def, finset.mul_sum]
end
end normed_ring_geometric
/-! ### Summability tests based on comparison with geometric series -/
lemma summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_le {α : Type*} [semi_normed_group α] [complete_space α]
{f : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr₁ : r < 1)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, ∥f (n+1)∥ ≤ r * ∥f n∥) : summable f :=
begin
by_cases hr₀ : 0 ≤ r,
{ rw eventually_at_top at h,
rcases h with ⟨N, hN⟩,
rw ← @summable_nat_add_iff α _ _ _ _ N,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded (λ n, ∥f N∥ * r^n)
(summable.mul_left _ $ summable_geometric_of_lt_1 hr₀ hr₁) (λ n, _),
conv_rhs {rw [mul_comm, ← zero_add N]},
refine le_geom hr₀ n (λ i _, _),
convert hN (i + N) (N.le_add_left i) using 3,
ac_refl },
{ push_neg at hr₀,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually 0 summable_zero _,
rw nat.cofinite_eq_at_top,
filter_upwards [h],
intros n hn,
by_contra h,
push_neg at h,
exact not_lt.mpr (norm_nonneg _) (lt_of_le_of_lt hn $ mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos hr₀ h) }
end
lemma summable_of_ratio_test_tendsto_lt_one {α : Type*} [normed_group α] [complete_space α]
{f : ℕ → α} {l : ℝ} (hl₁ : l < 1) (hf : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, f n ≠ 0)
(h : tendsto (λ n, ∥f (n+1)∥/∥f n∥) at_top (𝓝 l)) : summable f :=
begin
rcases exists_between hl₁ with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁⟩,
refine summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_le hr₁ _,
filter_upwards [eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt hr₀ h, hf],
intros n h₀ h₁,
rwa ← div_le_iff (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₁)
end
lemma not_summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_ge {α : Type*} [semi_normed_group α]
{f : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) (hf : ∃ᶠ n in at_top, ∥f n∥ ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, r * ∥f n∥ ≤ ∥f (n+1)∥) : ¬ summable f :=
begin
rw eventually_at_top at h,
rcases h with ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩,
rw frequently_at_top at hf,
rcases hf N₀ with ⟨N, hNN₀ : N₀ ≤ N, hN⟩,
rw ← @summable_nat_add_iff α _ _ _ _ N,
refine mt summable.tendsto_at_top_zero
(λ h', not_tendsto_at_top_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_norm_zero.comp h') _),
convert tendsto_at_top_of_geom_le _ hr _,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) _,
intro h'',
specialize hN₀ N hNN₀,
simp only [comp_app, zero_add] at h'',
exact hN h''.symm },
{ intro i,
dsimp only [comp_app],
convert (hN₀ (i + N) (hNN₀.trans (N.le_add_left i))) using 3,
ac_refl }
end
lemma not_summable_of_ratio_test_tendsto_gt_one {α : Type*} [semi_normed_group α]
{f : ℕ → α} {l : ℝ} (hl : 1 < l)
(h : tendsto (λ n, ∥f (n+1)∥/∥f n∥) at_top (𝓝 l)) : ¬ summable f :=
begin
have key : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, ∥f n∥ ≠ 0,
{ filter_upwards [eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt hl h],
intros n hn hc,
rw [hc, div_zero] at hn,
linarith },
rcases exists_between hl with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁⟩,
refine not_summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_ge hr₀ key.frequently _,
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt hr₁ h, key],
intros n h₀ h₁,
rwa ← le_div_iff (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) h₁.symm)
end
/-- A series whose terms are bounded by the terms of a converging geometric series converges. -/
lemma summable_one_div_pow_of_le {m : ℝ} {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hm : 1 < m) (fi : ∀ i, i ≤ f i) :
summable (λ i, 1 / m ^ f i) :=
begin
refine summable_of_nonneg_of_le
(λ a, one_div_nonneg.mpr (pow_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans hm.le) _)) (λ a, _)
(summable_geometric_of_lt_1 (one_div_nonneg.mpr (zero_le_one.trans hm.le))
((one_div_lt (zero_lt_one.trans hm) zero_lt_one).mpr (one_div_one.le.trans_lt hm))),
rw [div_pow, one_pow],
refine (one_div_le_one_div _ _).mpr (pow_le_pow hm.le (fi a));
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hm) _
end
/-! ### Positive sequences with small sums on encodable types -/
/-- For any positive `ε`, define on an encodable type a positive sequence with sum less than `ε` -/
def pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε)
(ι) [encodable ι] : {ε' : ι → ℝ // (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃ c, has_sum ε' c ∧ c ≤ ε} :=
begin
let f := λ n, (ε / 2) / 2 ^ n,
have hf : has_sum f ε := has_sum_geometric_two' _,
have f0 : ∀ n, 0 < f n := λ n, div_pos (half_pos hε) (pow_pos zero_lt_two _),
refine ⟨f ∘ encodable.encode, λ i, f0 _, _⟩,
rcases hf.summable.comp_injective (@encodable.encode_injective ι _) with ⟨c, hg⟩,
refine ⟨c, hg, has_sum_le_inj _ (@encodable.encode_injective ι _) _ _ hg hf⟩,
{ assume i _, exact le_of_lt (f0 _) },
{ assume n, exact le_refl _ }
end
namespace nnreal
theorem exists_pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : 0 < ε) (ι) [encodable ι] :
∃ ε' : ι → ℝ≥0, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃c, has_sum ε' c ∧ c < ε :=
let ⟨a, a0, aε⟩ := exists_between hε in
let ⟨ε', hε', c, hc, hcε⟩ := pos_sum_of_encodable a0 ι in
⟨ λi, ⟨ε' i, le_of_lt $ hε' i⟩, assume i, nnreal.coe_lt_coe.2 $ hε' i,
⟨c, has_sum_le (assume i, le_of_lt $ hε' i) has_sum_zero hc ⟩, nnreal.has_sum_coe.1 hc,
lt_of_le_of_lt (nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 hcε) aε ⟩
end nnreal
namespace ennreal
theorem exists_pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (ι) [encodable ι] :
∃ ε' : ι → ℝ≥0, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∑' i, (ε' i : ℝ≥0∞) < ε :=
begin
rcases exists_between hε with ⟨r, h0r, hrε⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hrε with ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩,
rcases nnreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable (coe_lt_coe.1 h0r) ι with ⟨ε', hp, c, hc, hcr⟩,
exact ⟨ε', hp, (ennreal.tsum_coe_eq hc).symm ▸ lt_trans (coe_lt_coe.2 hcr) hrε⟩
end
theorem exists_pos_sum_of_encodable' {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (ι) [encodable ι] :
∃ ε' : ι → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ (∑' i, ε' i) < ε :=
let ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ := exists_pos_sum_of_encodable hε ι in
⟨λ i, δ i, λ i, ennreal.coe_pos.2 (δpos i), hδ⟩
end ennreal
/-!
### Factorial
-/
lemma factorial_tendsto_at_top : tendsto nat.factorial at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone nat.monotone_factorial (λ n, ⟨n, n.self_le_factorial⟩)
lemma tendsto_factorial_div_pow_self_at_top : tendsto (λ n, n! / n^n : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'
tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat 1)
(eventually_of_forall $ λ n, div_nonneg (by exact_mod_cast n.factorial_pos.le)
(pow_nonneg (by exact_mod_cast n.zero_le) _))
begin
refine (eventually_gt_at_top 0).mono (λ n hn, _),
rcases nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne.symm with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
rw [← prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial, pow_eq_prod_const, div_eq_mul_inv, ← inv_eq_one_div,
prod_nat_cast, nat.cast_succ, ← prod_inv_distrib', ← prod_mul_distrib,
finset.prod_range_succ'],
simp only [prod_range_succ', one_mul, nat.cast_add, zero_add, nat.cast_one],
refine mul_le_of_le_one_left (inv_nonneg.mpr $ by exact_mod_cast hn.le) (prod_le_one _ _);
intros x hx; rw finset.mem_range at hx,
{ refine mul_nonneg _ (inv_nonneg.mpr _); norm_cast; linarith },
{ refine (div_le_one $ by exact_mod_cast hn).mpr _, norm_cast, linarith }
end
|
cee5e1bfb99a4d89f689b5f10ef422411fe3b2d2 | a45212b1526d532e6e83c44ddca6a05795113ddc | /src/topology/uniform_space/cauchy.lean | 7ec7071eac33325f6636bab687dd182f9547a18e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/mathlib | b21ab4068db079cbb8590b58fda9cc4bc1f35df4 | b3433a51ea8bc07c4159c1073838fc0ee9b8f227 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,791,089,608 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 165,722,980 | 5 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,552,657,455,000 | 1,547,494,646,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,083 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets.
-/
import topology.uniform_space.basic
open filter topological_space lattice set classical
local attribute [instance, priority 0] prop_decidable
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [uniform_space α]
universe u
local notation `𝓤` := uniformity
/-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an
`s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy
sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing
cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
def cauchy (f : filter α) := f ≠ ⊥ ∧ filter.prod f f ≤ (𝓤 α)
def is_complete (s : set α) := ∀f, cauchy f → f ≤ principal s → ∃x∈s, f ≤ nhds x
lemma cauchy_iff {f : filter α} :
cauchy f ↔ (f ≠ ⊥ ∧ (∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t∈f.sets, set.prod t t ⊆ s)) :=
and_congr (iff.refl _) $ forall_congr $ assume s, forall_congr $ assume hs, mem_prod_same_iff
lemma cauchy_map_iff {l : filter β} {f : β → α} :
cauchy (l.map f) ↔ (l ≠ ⊥ ∧ tendsto (λp:β×β, (f p.1, f p.2)) (l.prod l) (𝓤 α)) :=
by rw [cauchy, (≠), map_eq_bot_iff, prod_map_map_eq]; refl
lemma cauchy_downwards {f g : filter α} (h_c : cauchy f) (hg : g ≠ ⊥) (h_le : g ≤ f) : cauchy g :=
⟨hg, le_trans (filter.prod_mono h_le h_le) h_c.right⟩
lemma cauchy_nhds {a : α} : cauchy (nhds a) :=
⟨nhds_neq_bot,
calc filter.prod (nhds a) (nhds a) =
(𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α),
set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (a, y) ∈ t})) : nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s s) :
le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs,
infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le_of_le hs $ infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le_of_le hs $
principal_mono.mpr $
assume ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨(hx : (x, a) ∈ s), (hy : (a, y) ∈ s)⟩, ⟨a, hx, hy⟩
... ≤ 𝓤 α : comp_le_uniformity⟩
lemma cauchy_pure {a : α} : cauchy (pure a) :=
cauchy_downwards cauchy_nhds
(show principal {a} ≠ ⊥, by simp)
(pure_le_nhds a)
lemma le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp {f : filter α} {x : α} (hf : cauchy f)
(adhs : f ⊓ nhds x ≠ ⊥) : f ≤ nhds x :=
have ∀s∈f.sets, x ∈ closure s,
begin
intros s hs,
simp [closure_eq_nhds, inf_comm],
exact assume h', adhs $ bot_unique $ h' ▸ inf_le_inf (by simp; exact hs) (le_refl _)
end,
calc f ≤ f.lift' (λs:set α, {y | x ∈ closure s ∧ y ∈ closure s}) :
le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs,
begin
rw [←forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot] at adhs,
simp [this s hs],
exact mem_sets_of_superset hs subset_closure
end
... ≤ f.lift' (λs:set α, {y | (x, y) ∈ closure (set.prod s s)}) :
by simp [closure_prod_eq]; exact le_refl _
... = (filter.prod f f).lift' (λs:set (α×α), {y | (x, y) ∈ closure s}) :
begin
rw [prod_same_eq],
rw [lift'_lift'_assoc],
exact monotone_prod monotone_id monotone_id,
exact monotone_comp (assume s t h x h', closure_mono h h') monotone_preimage
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), {y | (x, y) ∈ closure s}) : lift'_mono hf.right (le_refl _)
... = ((𝓤 α).lift' closure).lift' (λs:set (α×α), {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) :
begin
rw [lift'_lift'_assoc],
exact assume s t h, closure_mono h,
exact monotone_preimage
end
... = (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) :
by rw [←uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure]
... = nhds x :
by rw [nhds_eq_uniformity]
lemma le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy {f : filter α} {x : α} (hf : cauchy f) :
f ≤ nhds x ↔ f ⊓ nhds x ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨assume h, (inf_of_le_left h).symm ▸ hf.left,
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hf⟩
lemma cauchy_map [uniform_space β] {f : filter α} {m : α → β}
(hm : uniform_continuous m) (hf : cauchy f) : cauchy (map m f) :=
⟨have f ≠ ⊥, from hf.left, by simp; assumption,
calc filter.prod (map m f) (map m f) =
map (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (filter.prod f f) : filter.prod_map_map_eq
... ≤ map (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 α) : map_mono hf.right
... ≤ 𝓤 β : hm⟩
lemma cauchy_comap [uniform_space β] {f : filter β} {m : α → β}
(hm : comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α)
(hf : cauchy f) (hb : comap m f ≠ ⊥) : cauchy (comap m f) :=
⟨hb,
calc filter.prod (comap m f) (comap m f) =
comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (filter.prod f f) : filter.prod_comap_comap_eq
... ≤ comap (λp:α×α, (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) : comap_mono hf.right
... ≤ 𝓤 α : hm⟩
/-- Cauchy sequences. Usually defined on ℕ, but often it is also useful to say that a function
defined on ℝ is Cauchy at +∞ to deduce convergence. Therefore, we define it in a type class that
is general enough to cover both ℕ and ℝ, which are the main motivating examples. -/
def cauchy_seq [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β] (u : β → α) := cauchy (at_top.map u)
lemma cauchy_seq_iff_prod_map [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ map (prod.map u u) at_top ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iff.trans (and_iff_right (map_ne_bot at_top_ne_bot)) (prod_map_at_top_eq u u ▸ iff.rfl)
/-- A complete space is defined here using uniformities. A uniform space
is complete if every Cauchy filter converges. -/
class complete_space (α : Type u) [uniform_space α] : Prop :=
(complete : ∀{f:filter α}, cauchy f → ∃x, f ≤ nhds x)
lemma complete_univ {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [complete_space α] :
is_complete (univ : set α) :=
begin
assume f hf _,
rcases complete_space.complete hf with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, by simp, hx⟩
end
lemma cauchy_prod [uniform_space β] {f : filter α} {g : filter β} :
cauchy f → cauchy g → cauchy (filter.prod f g)
| ⟨f_proper, hf⟩ ⟨g_proper, hg⟩ := ⟨filter.prod_neq_bot.2 ⟨f_proper, g_proper⟩,
let p_α := λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.1, p.2.1), p_β := λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.2, p.2.2) in
suffices (f.prod f).comap p_α ⊓ (g.prod g).comap p_β ≤ (𝓤 α).comap p_α ⊓ (𝓤 β).comap p_β,
by simpa [uniformity_prod, filter.prod, filter.comap_inf, filter.comap_comap_comp, (∘),
lattice.inf_assoc, lattice.inf_comm, lattice.inf_left_comm],
lattice.inf_le_inf (filter.comap_mono hf) (filter.comap_mono hg)⟩
instance complete_space.prod [uniform_space β] [complete_space α] [complete_space β] :
complete_space (α × β) :=
{ complete := λ f hf,
let ⟨x1, hx1⟩ := complete_space.complete $ cauchy_map uniform_continuous_fst hf in
let ⟨x2, hx2⟩ := complete_space.complete $ cauchy_map uniform_continuous_snd hf in
⟨(x1, x2), by rw [nhds_prod_eq, filter.prod_def];
from filter.le_lift (λ s hs, filter.le_lift' $ λ t ht,
have H1 : prod.fst ⁻¹' s ∈ f.sets := hx1 hs,
have H2 : prod.snd ⁻¹' t ∈ f.sets := hx2 ht,
filter.inter_mem_sets H1 H2)⟩ }
/--If `univ` is complete, the space is a complete space -/
lemma complete_space_of_is_complete_univ (h : is_complete (univ : set α)) : complete_space α :=
⟨λ f hf, let ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := h f hf ((@principal_univ α).symm ▸ le_top) in ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
lemma cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds [uniform_space α] [complete_space α] {l : filter α} (hl : l ≠ ⊥) :
cauchy l ↔ (∃x, l ≤ nhds x) :=
⟨complete_space.complete, assume ⟨x, hx⟩, cauchy_downwards cauchy_nhds hl hx⟩
lemma cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto [uniform_space α] [complete_space α] {l : filter β} {f : β → α}
(hl : l ≠ ⊥) : cauchy (l.map f) ↔ (∃x, tendsto f l (nhds x)) :=
cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds (map_ne_bot hl)
/-- A Cauchy sequence in a complete space converges -/
theorem cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β] [complete_space α]
{u : β → α} (H : cauchy_seq u) : ∃x, tendsto u at_top (nhds x) :=
complete_space.complete H
theorem le_nhds_lim_of_cauchy {α} [uniform_space α] [complete_space α]
[inhabited α] {f : filter α} (hf : cauchy f) : f ≤ nhds (lim f) :=
lim_spec (complete_space.complete hf)
lemma is_complete_of_is_closed [complete_space α] {s : set α}
(h : is_closed s) : is_complete s :=
λ f cf fs, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := complete_space.complete cf in
⟨x, is_closed_iff_nhds.mp h x (neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot cf.left (le_inf hx fs)), hx⟩
/-- A set `s` is totally bounded if for every entourage `d` there is a finite
set of points `t` such that every element of `s` is `d`-near to some element of `t`. -/
def totally_bounded (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t : set α, finite t ∧ s ⊆ (⋃y∈t, {x | (x,y) ∈ d})
theorem totally_bounded_iff_subset {s : set α} : totally_bounded s ↔
∀d ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃t ⊆ s, finite t ∧ s ⊆ (⋃y∈t, {x | (x,y) ∈ d}) :=
⟨λ H d hd, begin
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hd with ⟨r, hr, rs, rd⟩,
rcases H r hr with ⟨k, fk, ks⟩,
let u := {y ∈ k | ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ (x, y) ∈ r},
let f : u → α := λ x, classical.some x.2.2,
have : ∀ x : u, f x ∈ s ∧ (f x, x.1) ∈ r := λ x, classical.some_spec x.2.2,
refine ⟨range f, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact range_subset_iff.2 (λ x, (this x).1) },
{ have : finite u := finite_subset fk (λ x h, h.1),
exact ⟨@set.fintype_range _ _ _ _ this.fintype⟩ },
{ intros x xs,
have := ks xs, simp at this,
rcases this with ⟨y, hy, xy⟩,
let z : coe_sort u := ⟨y, hy, x, xs, xy⟩,
exact mem_bUnion_iff.2 ⟨_, ⟨z, rfl⟩, rd $ mem_comp_rel.2 ⟨_, xy, rs (this z).2⟩⟩ }
end,
λ H d hd, let ⟨t, _, ht⟩ := H d hd in ⟨t, ht⟩⟩
lemma totally_bounded_subset [uniform_space α] {s₁ s₂ : set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h : totally_bounded s₂) : totally_bounded s₁ :=
assume d hd, let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h d hd in ⟨t, ht₁, subset.trans hs ht₂⟩
lemma totally_bounded_empty [uniform_space α] : totally_bounded (∅ : set α) :=
λ d hd, ⟨∅, finite_empty, empty_subset _⟩
lemma totally_bounded_closure [uniform_space α] {s : set α} (h : totally_bounded s) :
totally_bounded (closure s) :=
assume t ht,
let ⟨t', ht', hct', htt'⟩ := mem_uniformity_is_closed ht, ⟨c, hcf, hc⟩ := h t' ht' in
⟨c, hcf,
calc closure s ⊆ closure (⋃ (y : α) (H : y ∈ c), {x : α | (x, y) ∈ t'}) : closure_mono hc
... = _ : closure_eq_of_is_closed $ is_closed_Union hcf $ assume i hi,
continuous_iff_is_closed.mp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const) _ hct'
... ⊆ _ : bUnion_subset $ assume i hi, subset.trans (assume x, @htt' (x, i))
(subset_bUnion_of_mem hi)⟩
lemma totally_bounded_image [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hs : totally_bounded s) : totally_bounded (f '' s) :=
assume t ht,
have {p:α×α | (f p.1, f p.2) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓤 α,
from hf ht,
let ⟨c, hfc, hct⟩ := hs _ this in
⟨f '' c, finite_image f hfc,
begin
simp [image_subset_iff],
simp [subset_def] at hct,
intros x hx, simp [-mem_image],
exact let ⟨i, hi, ht⟩ := hct x hx in ⟨f i, mem_image_of_mem f hi, ht⟩
end⟩
lemma cauchy_of_totally_bounded_of_ultrafilter {s : set α} {f : filter α}
(hs : totally_bounded s) (hf : is_ultrafilter f) (h : f ≤ principal s) : cauchy f :=
⟨hf.left, assume t ht,
let ⟨t', ht'₁, ht'_symm, ht'_t⟩ := comp_symm_of_uniformity ht in
let ⟨i, hi, hs_union⟩ := hs t' ht'₁ in
have (⋃y∈i, {x | (x,y) ∈ t'}) ∈ f.sets,
from mem_sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.mp h) hs_union,
have ∃y∈i, {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} ∈ f.sets,
from mem_of_finite_Union_ultrafilter hf hi this,
let ⟨y, hy, hif⟩ := this in
have set.prod {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} {x | (x,y) ∈ t'} ⊆ comp_rel t' t',
from assume ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨(h₁ : (x₁, y) ∈ t'), (h₂ : (x₂, y) ∈ t')⟩,
⟨y, h₁, ht'_symm h₂⟩,
(filter.prod f f).sets_of_superset (prod_mem_prod hif hif) (subset.trans this ht'_t)⟩
lemma totally_bounded_iff_filter {s : set α} :
totally_bounded s ↔ (∀f, f ≠ ⊥ → f ≤ principal s → ∃c ≤ f, cauchy c) :=
⟨assume : totally_bounded s, assume f hf hs,
⟨ultrafilter_of f, ultrafilter_of_le,
cauchy_of_totally_bounded_of_ultrafilter this
(ultrafilter_ultrafilter_of hf) (le_trans ultrafilter_of_le hs)⟩,
assume h : ∀f, f ≠ ⊥ → f ≤ principal s → ∃c ≤ f, cauchy c, assume d hd,
classical.by_contradiction $ assume hs,
have hd_cover : ∀{t:set α}, finite t → ¬ s ⊆ (⋃y∈t, {x | (x,y) ∈ d}),
by simpa using hs,
let
f := ⨅t:{t : set α // finite t}, principal (s \ (⋃y∈t.val, {x | (x,y) ∈ d})),
⟨a, ha⟩ := @exists_mem_of_ne_empty α s
(assume h, hd_cover finite_empty $ h.symm ▸ empty_subset _)
in
have f ≠ ⊥,
from infi_neq_bot_of_directed ⟨a⟩
(assume ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩, ⟨⟨t₁ ∪ t₂, finite_union ht₁ ht₂⟩,
principal_mono.mpr $ diff_subset_diff_right $ Union_subset_Union $
assume t, Union_subset_Union_const or.inl,
principal_mono.mpr $ diff_subset_diff_right $ Union_subset_Union $
assume t, Union_subset_Union_const or.inr⟩)
(assume ⟨t, ht⟩, by simp [diff_eq_empty]; exact hd_cover ht),
have f ≤ principal s, from infi_le_of_le ⟨∅, finite_empty⟩ $ by simp; exact subset.refl s,
let
⟨c, (hc₁ : c ≤ f), (hc₂ : cauchy c)⟩ := h f ‹f ≠ ⊥› this,
⟨m, hm, (hmd : set.prod m m ⊆ d)⟩ := (@mem_prod_same_iff α c d).mp $ hc₂.right hd
in
have c ≤ principal s, from le_trans ‹c ≤ f› this,
have m ∩ s ∈ c.sets, from inter_mem_sets hm $ le_principal_iff.mp this,
let ⟨y, hym, hys⟩ := inhabited_of_mem_sets hc₂.left this in
let ys := (⋃y'∈({y}:set α), {x | (x, y') ∈ d}) in
have m ⊆ ys,
from assume y' hy',
show y' ∈ (⋃y'∈({y}:set α), {x | (x, y') ∈ d}),
by simp; exact @hmd (y', y) ⟨hy', hym⟩,
have c ≤ principal (s - ys),
from le_trans hc₁ $ infi_le_of_le ⟨{y}, finite_singleton _⟩ $ le_refl _,
have (s - ys) ∩ (m ∩ s) ∈ c.sets,
from inter_mem_sets (le_principal_iff.mp this) ‹m ∩ s ∈ c.sets›,
have ∅ ∈ c.sets,
from c.sets_of_superset this $ assume x ⟨⟨hxs, hxys⟩, hxm, _⟩, hxys $ ‹m ⊆ ys› hxm,
hc₂.left $ empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mp this⟩
lemma totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter {s : set α} :
totally_bounded s ↔ (∀f, is_ultrafilter f → f ≤ principal s → cauchy f) :=
⟨assume hs f, cauchy_of_totally_bounded_of_ultrafilter hs,
assume h, totally_bounded_iff_filter.mpr $ assume f hf hfs,
have cauchy (ultrafilter_of f),
from h (ultrafilter_of f) (ultrafilter_ultrafilter_of hf) (le_trans ultrafilter_of_le hfs),
⟨ultrafilter_of f, ultrafilter_of_le, this⟩⟩
lemma compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete {s : set α} :
compact s ↔ totally_bounded s ∧ is_complete s :=
⟨λ hs, ⟨totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter.2 (λ f hf1 hf2,
let ⟨x, xs, fx⟩ := compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.1 hs f hf1 hf2 in
cauchy_downwards (cauchy_nhds) (hf1.1) fx),
λ f fc fs,
let ⟨a, as, fa⟩ := hs f fc.1 fs in
⟨a, as, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp fc fa⟩⟩,
λ ⟨ht, hc⟩, compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.2
(λf hf hfs, hc _ (totally_bounded_iff_ultrafilter.1 ht _ hf hfs) hfs)⟩
instance complete_of_compact {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [compact_space α] : complete_space α :=
⟨λf hf, by simpa [principal_univ] using (compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 compact_univ).2 f hf⟩
lemma compact_of_totally_bounded_is_closed [complete_space α] {s : set α}
(ht : totally_bounded s) (hc : is_closed s) : compact s :=
(@compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete α _ s).2 ⟨ht, is_complete_of_is_closed hc⟩
|
6ac200fc8ed315a5c73b360fe6de422dbaa422df | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/topology/algebra/multilinear.lean | 8ad6207fdad88f0fda3ccc14e7551eb6380292da | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,873 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.algebra.module
import linear_algebra.multilinear
/-!
# Continuous multilinear maps
We define continuous multilinear maps as maps from `Π(i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂` which are multilinear
and continuous, by extending the space of multilinear maps with a continuity assumption.
Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type, and all these
spaces are also topological spaces.
## Main definitions
* `continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂` is the space of continuous multilinear maps from
`Π(i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂`. We show that it is an `R`-module.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API of multilinear maps.
## Notation
We introduce the notation `M [×n]→L[R] M'` for the space of continuous `n`-multilinear maps from
`M^n` to `M'`. This is a particular case of the general notion (where we allow varying dependent
types as the arguments of our continuous multilinear maps), but arguably the most important one,
especially when defining iterated derivatives.
-/
open function fin set
universes u v w w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄
variables {R : Type u} {ι : Type v} {n : ℕ}
{M : fin n.succ → Type w} {M₁ : ι → Type w₁} {M₂ : Type w₂} {M₃ : Type w₃} {M₄ : Type w₄}
[decidable_eq ι]
/-- Continuous multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `Πi, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂`
are modules over `R` with a topological structure. In applications, there will be compatibility
conditions between the algebraic and the topological structures, but this is not needed for the
definition. -/
structure continuous_multilinear_map (R : Type u) {ι : Type v} (M₁ : ι → Type w₁) (M₂ : Type w₂)
[decidable_eq ι] [semiring R] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)]
[semimodule R M₂] [∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂]
extends multilinear_map R M₁ M₂ :=
(cont : continuous to_fun)
notation M `[×`:25 n `]→L[`:25 R `] ` M' := continuous_multilinear_map R (λ (i : fin n), M) M'
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
section semiring
variables [semiring R]
[∀i, add_comm_monoid (M i)] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
[add_comm_monoid M₄]
[∀i, semimodule R (M i)] [∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
[semimodule R M₄]
[∀i, topological_space (M i)] [∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂]
[topological_space M₃] [topological_space M₄]
(f f' : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
instance : has_coe_to_fun (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨_, λ f, f.to_multilinear_map.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_coe : (f.to_multilinear_map : (Π i, M₁ i) → M₂) = f := rfl
@[ext] theorem ext {f f' : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
by { cases f, cases f', congr, ext x, exact H x }
@[simp] lemma map_add (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.add m i x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.smul m i c x
lemma map_coord_zero {m : Πi, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_coord_zero i h
@[simp] lemma map_zero [nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_zero
instance : has_zero (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨{ cont := continuous_const, ..(0 : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) }⟩
instance : inhabited (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (0 : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) m = 0 := rfl
section topological_add_monoid
variable [topological_add_monoid M₂]
instance : has_add (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ f f', {cont := f.cont.add f'.cont, ..(f.to_multilinear_map + f'.to_multilinear_map)}⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m := rfl
instance add_comm_monoid : add_comm_monoid (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), ..}; intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp] lemma sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
(m : Πi, M₁ i) : ∀ {s : finset α}, (s.sum f) m = s.sum (λ a, f a m) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction,
{ rw finset.sum_empty, simp },
{ assume a s has H, rw finset.sum_insert has, simp [H, has] }
end
end topological_add_monoid
/-- If `f` is a continuous multilinear map, then `f.to_continuous_linear_map m i` is the continuous
linear map obtained by fixing all coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the
`i`-th coordinate. -/
def to_continuous_linear_map (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := f.cont.comp continuous_update, ..(f.to_multilinear_map.to_linear_map m i) }
/-- The cartesian product of two continuous multilinear maps, as a continuous multilinear map. -/
def prod (f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) (g : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₃) :
continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ cont := f.cont.prod_mk g.cont,
.. f.to_multilinear_map.prod g.to_multilinear_map }
@[simp] lemma prod_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) (g : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₃) (m : Πi, M₁ i) :
(f.prod g) m = (f m, g m) := rfl
/- If `R` and `M₃` are implicit in the next definition, Lean is never able to infer them, even
given `g` and `f`. Therefore, we make them explicit. -/
variables (R M₃)
/-- If `g` is continuous multilinear and `f` is continuous linear, then `g (f m₁, ..., f mₙ)` is
again a continuous multilinear map, that we call `g.comp_continuous_linear_map f`. -/
def comp_continuous_linear_map
(g : continuous_multilinear_map R (λ (i : ι), M₃) M₄) (f : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
continuous_multilinear_map R (λ (i : ι), M₂) M₄ :=
{ cont := g.cont.comp $ continuous_pi $ λj, f.cont.comp $ continuous_apply _,
.. g.to_multilinear_map.comp_linear_map R M₃ f.to_linear_map }
variables {R M₃}
/-- In the specific case of continuous multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `fin (n+1)`, where one
can build an element of `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the
additivity of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
lemma cons_add (f : continuous_multilinear_map R M M₂) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x+y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.cons_add m x y
/-- In the specific case of continuous multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `fin (n+1)`, where one
can build an element of `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the
multiplicativity of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
lemma cons_smul
(f : continuous_multilinear_map R M M₂) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.succ) (c : R) (x : M 0) :
f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.cons_smul m c x
lemma map_piecewise_add (m m' : Πi, M₁ i) (t : finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = t.powerset.sum (λ s, f (s.piecewise m m')) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_piecewise_add _ _ _
/-- Additivity of a continuous multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
lemma map_add_univ [fintype ι] (m m' : Πi, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = (finset.univ : finset (finset ι)).sum (λ s, f (s.piecewise m m')) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_add_univ _ _
section apply_sum
open fintype finset
variables {α : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] (g : Π i, α i → M₁ i) (A : Π i, finset (α i))
/-- If `f` is continuous multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum
of `f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
lemma map_sum_finset :
f (λ i, (A i).sum (g i)) = (pi_finset A).sum (λ r, f (λ i, g i (r i))) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_sum_finset _ _
/-- If `f` is continuous multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
lemma map_sum [∀ i, fintype (α i)] :
f (λ i, finset.univ.sum (g i)) = finset.univ.sum (λ (r : Π i, α i), f (λ i, g i (r i))) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_sum _
end apply_sum
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] [∀i, add_comm_group (M₁ i)] [add_comm_group M₂]
[∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂] [∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂]
(f f' : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
@[simp] lemma map_sub (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_sub _ _ _ _
section topological_add_group
variable [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : has_neg (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ f, {cont := f.cont.neg, ..(-f.to_multilinear_map)}⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (-f) m = - (f m) := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
by refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, ..};
intros; ext; simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp] lemma sub_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (f - f') m = f m - f' m := rfl
end topological_add_group
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R]
[∀i, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂]
[∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂]
(f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
lemma map_piecewise_smul (c : ι → R) (m : Πi, M₁ i) (s : finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (λ i, c i • m i) m) = s.prod c • f m :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_piecewise_smul _ _ _
/-- Multiplicativity of a continuous multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (λ i, c i • m i)` as `univ.prod c • f m`. -/
lemma map_smul_univ [fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : Πi, M₁ i) :
f (λ i, c i • m i) = finset.univ.prod c • f m :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_smul_univ _ _
variables [topological_space R] [topological_semimodule R M₂]
instance : has_scalar R (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ c f, { cont := continuous.smul continuous_const f.cont, .. c • f.to_multilinear_map }⟩
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (c : R) (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (c • f) m = c • f m := rfl
end comm_ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R]
[∀i, add_comm_group (M₁ i)] [add_comm_group M₂]
[∀i, semimodule R (M₁ i)] [semimodule R M₂]
[∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂] [topological_add_group M₂]
[topological_space R] [topological_semimodule R M₂]
(f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps is a module over `R`, for the pointwise addition and
scalar multiplication. -/
instance : semimodule R (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
semimodule.of_core $ by refine { smul := (•), .. };
intros; ext; simp [smul_add, add_smul, smul_smul]
/-- Linear map version of the map `to_multilinear_map` associating to a continuous multilinear map
the corresponding multilinear map. -/
def to_multilinear_map_linear :
(continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) →ₗ[R] (multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f.to_multilinear_map,
add := λ f g, rfl,
smul := λ c f, rfl }
end comm_ring
end continuous_multilinear_map
namespace continuous_linear_map
variables [ring R] [∀i, add_comm_group (M₁ i)] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
[∀i, module R (M₁ i)] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
[∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂] [topological_space M₃]
/-- Composing a continuous multilinear map with a continuous linear map gives again a
continuous multilinear map. -/
def comp_continuous_multilinear_map (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :
continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₃ :=
{ cont := g.cont.comp f.cont,
.. g.to_linear_map.comp_multilinear_map f.to_multilinear_map }
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_multilinear_map_coe (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :
((g.comp_continuous_multilinear_map f) : (Πi, M₁ i) → M₃) =
(g : M₂ → M₃) ∘ (f : (Πi, M₁ i) → M₂) :=
by { ext m, refl }
end continuous_linear_map
|
2753d6860a2adea3453edece122d910396fd22e8 | 4efff1f47634ff19e2f786deadd394270a59ecd2 | /src/tactic/ring_exp.lean | fb44afc5ba19c278770546f2ea2ce2023366afc9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | agjftucker/mathlib | d634cd0d5256b6325e3c55bb7fb2403548371707 | 87fe50de17b00af533f72a102d0adefe4a2285e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,378,131,941 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 160,748,509 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,141,789,000 | 1,544,141,789,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 56,265 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Tim Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Tim Baanen.
Solve equations in commutative (semi)rings with exponents.
-/
import tactic.norm_num
import control.traversable.basic
/-!
# `ring_exp` tactic
A tactic for solving equations in commutative (semi)rings,
where the exponents can also contain variables.
More precisely, expressions of the following form are supported:
- constants (non-negative integers)
- variables
- coefficients (any rational number, embedded into the (semi)ring)
- addition of expressions
- multiplication of expressions
- exponentiation of expressions (the exponent must have type `ℕ`)
- subtraction and negation of expressions (if the base is a full ring)
The motivating example is proving `2 * 2^n * b = b * 2^(n+1)`,
something that the `ring` tactic cannot do, but `ring_exp` can.
## Implementation notes
The basic approach to prove equalities is to normalise both sides and check for equality.
The normalisation is guided by building a value in the type `ex` at the meta level,
together with a proof (at the base level) that the original value is equal to
the normalised version.
The normalised version and normalisation proofs are also stored in the `ex` type.
The outline of the file:
- Define an inductive family of types `ex`, parametrised over `ex_type`,
which can represent expressions with `+`, `*`, `^` and rational numerals.
The parametrisation over `ex_type` ensures that associativity and distributivity are applied,
by restricting which kinds of subexpressions appear as arguments to the various operators.
- Represent addition, multiplication and exponentiation in the `ex` type,
thus allowing us to map expressions to `ex` (the `eval` function drives this).
We apply associativity and distributivity of the operators here (helped by `ex_type`)
and commutativity as well (by sorting the subterms; unfortunately not helped by anything).
Any expression not of the above formats is treated as an atom (the same as a variable).
There are some details we glossed over which make the plan more complicated:
- The order on atoms is not initially obvious.
We construct a list containing them in order of initial appearance in the expression,
then use the index into the list as a key to order on.
- In the tactic, a normalized expression `ps : ex` lives in the meta-world,
but the normalization proofs live in the real world.
Thus, we cannot directly say `ps.orig = ps.pretty` anywhere,
but we have to carefully construct the proof when we compute `ps`.
This was a major source of bugs in development!
- For `pow`, the exponent must be a natural number, while the base can be any semiring `α`.
We swap out operations for the base ring `α` with those for the exponent ring `ℕ`
as soon as we deal with exponents.
This is accomplished by the `in_exponent` function and is relatively painless since
we work in a `reader` monad.
- The normalized form of an expression is the one that is useful for the tactic,
but not as nice to read. To remedy this, the user-facing normalization calls `ex.simp`.
## Caveats and future work
Subtraction cancels out identical terms, but division does not.
That is: `a - a = 0 := by ring_exp` solves the goal,
but `a / a := 1 by ring_exp` doesn't.
Note that `0 / 0` is generally defined to be `0`,
so division cancelling out is not true in general.
Multiplication of powers can be simplified a little bit further:
`2 ^ n * 2 ^ n = 4 ^ n := by ring_exp` could be implemented
in a similar way that `2 * a + 2 * a = 4 * a := by ring_exp` already works.
This feature wasn't needed yet, so it's not implemented yet.
## Tags
ring, semiring, exponent, power
-/
-- The base ring `α` will have a universe level `u`.
-- We do not introduce `α` as a variable yet,
-- in order to make it explicit or implicit as required.
universes u
namespace tactic.ring_exp
open nat
/--
The `atom` structure is used to represent atomic expressions:
those which `ring_exp` cannot parse any further.
For instance, `a + (a % b)` has `a` and `(a % b)` as atoms.
The `ring_exp_eq` tactic does not normalize the subexpressions in atoms,
but `ring_exp` does if `ring_exp_eq` was not sufficient.
Atoms in fact represent equivalence classes of expressions,
modulo definitional equality.
The field `index : ℕ` should be a unique number for each class,
while `value : expr` contains a representative of this class.
The function `resolve_atom` determines the appropriate atom
for a given expression.
-/
meta structure atom : Type := (value : expr) (index : ℕ)
namespace atom
/--
The `eq` operation on `atom`s works modulo definitional equality,
ignoring their `value`s.
The invariants on `atom` ensure indices are unique per value.
Thus, `eq` indicates equality as long as the `atom`s come from the same context.
-/
meta def eq (a b : atom) : bool := a.index = b.index
/--
We order `atom`s on the order of appearance in the main expression.
-/
meta def lt (a b : atom) : bool := a.index < b.index
meta instance : has_repr atom := ⟨λ x, "(atom " ++ repr x.2 ++ ")"⟩
end atom
section expression
/-!
### `expression` section
In this section, we define the `ex` type and its basic operations.
First, we introduce the supporting types `coeff`, `ex_type` and `ex_info`.
For understanding the code, it's easier to check out `ex` itself first,
then refer back to the supporting types.
The arithmetic operations on `ex` need additional definitions,
so they are defined in a later section.
-/
/--
Coefficients in the expression are stored in a wrapper structure,
allowing for easier modification of the data structures.
The modifications might be caching of the result of `expr.of_rat`,
or using a different meta representation of numerals.
-/
@[derive decidable_eq, derive inhabited]
structure coeff : Type := (value : ℚ)
/-- The values in `ex_type` are used as parameters to `ex` to control the expression's structure. -/
@[derive decidable_eq, derive inhabited]
inductive ex_type : Type
| base : ex_type
| sum : ex_type
| prod : ex_type
| exp : ex_type
open ex_type
/--
Each `ex` stores information for its normalization proof.
The `orig` expression is the expression that was passed to `eval`.
The `pretty` expression is the normalised form that the `ex` represents.
(I didn't call this something like `norm`, because there are already
too many things called `norm` in mathematics!)
The field `proof` contains an optional proof term of type `%%orig = %%pretty`.
The value `none` for the proof indicates that everything reduces to reflexivity.
(Which saves space in quite a lot of cases.)
-/
meta structure ex_info : Type :=
(orig : expr) (pretty : expr) (proof : option expr)
/--
The `ex` type is an abstract representation of an expression with `+`, `*` and `^`.
Those operators are mapped to the `sum`, `prod` and `exp` constructors respectively.
The `zero` constructor is the base case for `ex sum`, e.g. `1 + 2` is represented
by (something along the lines of) `sum 1 (sum 2 zero)`.
The `coeff` constructor is the base case for `ex prod`, and is used for numerals.
The code maintains the invariant that the coefficient is never `0`.
The `var` constructor is the base case for `ex exp`, and is used for atoms.
The `sum_b` constructor allows for addition in the base of an exponentiation;
it serves a similar purpose as the parentheses in `(a + b)^c`.
The code maintains the invariant that the argument to `sum_b` is not `zero`
or `sum _ zero`.
All of the constructors contain an `ex_info` field,
used to carry around (arguments to) proof terms.
While the `ex_type` parameter enforces some simplification invariants,
the following ones must be manually maintained at the risk of insufficient power:
- the argument to `coeff` must be nonzero (to ensure `0 = 0 * 1`)
- the argument to `sum_b` must be of the form `sum a (sum b bs)` (to ensure `(a + 0)^n = a^n`)
- normalisation proofs of subexpressions must be `refl ps.pretty`
- if we replace `sum` with `cons` and `zero` with `nil`, the resulting list is sorted
according to the `lt` relation defined further down; similarly for `prod` and `coeff`
(to ensure `a + b = b + a`).
The first two invariants could be encoded in a subtype of `ex`,
but aren't (yet) to spare some implementation burden.
The other invariants cannot be encoded because we need the `tactic` monad to check them.
(For example, the correct equality check of `expr` is `is_def_eq : expr → expr → tactic unit`.)
-/
meta inductive ex : ex_type → Type
| zero (info : ex_info) : ex sum
| sum (info : ex_info) : ex prod → ex sum → ex sum
| coeff (info : ex_info) : coeff → ex prod
| prod (info : ex_info) : ex exp → ex prod → ex prod
| var (info : ex_info) : atom → ex base
| sum_b (info : ex_info) : ex sum → ex base
| exp (info : ex_info) : ex base → ex prod → ex exp
/--
Return the proof information associated to the `ex`.
-/
meta def ex.info : Π {et : ex_type} (ps : ex et), ex_info
| sum (ex.zero i) := i
| sum (ex.sum i _ _) := i
| prod (ex.coeff i _) := i
| prod (ex.prod i _ _) := i
| base (ex.var i _) := i
| base (ex.sum_b i _) := i
| exp (ex.exp i _ _) := i
/--
Return the original, non-normalized version of this `ex`.
Note that arguments to another `ex` are always "pre-normalized":
their `orig` and `pretty` are equal, and their `proof` is reflexivity.
-/
meta def ex.orig {et : ex_type} (ps : ex et) : expr := ps.info.orig
/--
Return the normalized version of this `ex`.
-/
meta def ex.pretty {et : ex_type} (ps : ex et) : expr := ps.info.pretty
/--
Return the normalisation proof of the given expression.
If the proof is `refl`, we give `none` instead,
which helps to control the size of proof terms.
To get an actual term, use `ex.proof_term`,
or use `mk_proof` with the correct set of arguments.
-/
meta def ex.proof {et : ex_type} (ps : ex et) : option expr := ps.info.proof
/--
Update the `orig` and `proof` fields of the `ex_info`.
Intended for use in `ex.set_info`.
-/
meta def ex_info.set (i : ex_info) (o : option expr) (pf : option expr) : ex_info :=
{orig := o.get_or_else i.pretty, proof := pf, .. i}
/--
Update the `ex_info` of the given expression.
We use this to combine intermediate normalisation proofs.
Since `pretty` only depends on the subexpressions,
which do not change, we do not set `pretty`.
-/
meta def ex.set_info : Π {et : ex_type} (ps : ex et), option expr → option expr → ex et
| sum (ex.zero i) o pf := ex.zero (i.set o pf)
| sum (ex.sum i p ps) o pf := ex.sum (i.set o pf) p ps
| prod (ex.coeff i x) o pf := ex.coeff (i.set o pf) x
| prod (ex.prod i p ps) o pf := ex.prod (i.set o pf) p ps
| base (ex.var i x) o pf := ex.var (i.set o pf) x
| base (ex.sum_b i ps) o pf := ex.sum_b (i.set o pf) ps
| exp (ex.exp i p ps) o pf := ex.exp (i.set o pf) p ps
instance coeff_has_repr : has_repr coeff := ⟨λ x, repr x.1⟩
/-- Convert an `ex` to a `string`. -/
meta def ex.repr : Π {et : ex_type}, ex et → string
| sum (ex.zero _) := "0"
| sum (ex.sum _ p ps) := ex.repr p ++ " + " ++ ex.repr ps
| prod (ex.coeff _ x) := repr x
| prod (ex.prod _ p ps) := ex.repr p ++ " * " ++ ex.repr ps
| base (ex.var _ x) := repr x
| base (ex.sum_b _ ps) := "(" ++ ex.repr ps ++ ")"
| exp (ex.exp _ p ps) := ex.repr p ++ " ^ " ++ ex.repr ps
meta instance {et : ex_type} : has_repr (ex et) := ⟨ex.repr⟩
/--
Equality test for expressions.
Since equivalence of `atom`s is not the same as equality,
we cannot make a true `(=)` operator for `ex` either.
-/
meta def ex.eq : Π {et : ex_type}, ex et → ex et → bool
| sum (ex.zero _) (ex.zero _) := tt
| sum (ex.zero _) (ex.sum _ _ _) := ff
| sum (ex.sum _ _ _) (ex.zero _) := ff
| sum (ex.sum _ p ps) (ex.sum _ q qs) := p.eq q && ps.eq qs
| prod (ex.coeff _ x) (ex.coeff _ y) := x = y
| prod (ex.coeff _ _) (ex.prod _ _ _) := ff
| prod (ex.prod _ _ _) (ex.coeff _ _) := ff
| prod (ex.prod _ p ps) (ex.prod _ q qs) := p.eq q && ps.eq qs
| base (ex.var _ x) (ex.var _ y) := x.eq y
| base (ex.var _ _) (ex.sum_b _ _) := ff
| base (ex.sum_b _ _) (ex.var _ _) := ff
| base (ex.sum_b _ ps) (ex.sum_b _ qs) := ps.eq qs
| exp (ex.exp _ p ps) (ex.exp _ q qs) := p.eq q && ps.eq qs
/--
The ordering on expressions.
As for `ex.eq`, this is a linear order only in one context.
-/
meta def ex.lt : Π {et : ex_type}, ex et → ex et → bool
| sum _ (ex.zero _) := ff
| sum (ex.zero _) _ := tt
| sum (ex.sum _ p ps) (ex.sum _ q qs) := p.lt q || (p.eq q && ps.lt qs)
| prod (ex.coeff _ x) (ex.coeff _ y) := x.1 < y.1
| prod (ex.coeff _ _) _ := tt
| prod _ (ex.coeff _ _) := ff
| prod (ex.prod _ p ps) (ex.prod _ q qs) := p.lt q || (p.eq q && ps.lt qs)
| base (ex.var _ x) (ex.var _ y) := x.lt y
| base (ex.var _ _) (ex.sum_b _ _) := tt
| base (ex.sum_b _ _) (ex.var _ _) := ff
| base (ex.sum_b _ ps) (ex.sum_b _ qs) := ps.lt qs
| exp (ex.exp _ p ps) (ex.exp _ q qs) := p.lt q || (p.eq q && ps.lt qs)
end expression
section operations
/-!
### `operations` section
This section defines the operations (on `ex`) that use tactics.
They live in the `ring_exp_m` monad,
which adds a cache and a list of encountered atoms to the `tactic` monad.
Throughout this section, we will be constructing proof terms.
The lemmas used in the construction are all defined over a commutative semiring α.
-/
variables {α : Type u} [comm_semiring α]
open tactic
open ex_type
/--
Stores the information needed in the `eval` function and its dependencies,
so they can (re)construct expressions.
The `eval_info` structure stores this information for one type,
and the `context` combines the two types, one for bases and one for exponents.
-/
meta structure eval_info :=
(α : expr) (univ : level)
-- Cache the instances for optimization and consistency
(csr_instance : expr) (ha_instance : expr) (hm_instance : expr) (hp_instance : expr)
-- Optional instances (only required for (-) and (/) respectively)
(ring_instance : option expr) (dr_instance : option expr)
-- Cache common constants.
(zero : expr) (one : expr)
/--
The `context` contains the full set of information needed for the `eval` function.
This structure has two copies of `eval_info`:
one is for the base (typically some semiring `α`) and another for the exponent (always `ℕ`).
When evaluating an exponent, we put `info_e` in `info_b`.
-/
meta structure context :=
(info_b : eval_info) (info_e : eval_info) (transp : transparency)
/--
The `ring_exp_m` monad is used instead of `tactic` to store the context.
-/
@[derive [monad, alternative]]
meta def ring_exp_m (α : Type) : Type := reader_t context (state_t (list atom) tactic) α
/--
Access the instance cache.
-/
meta def get_context : ring_exp_m context := reader_t.read
/--
Lift an operation in the `tactic` monad to the `ring_exp_m` monad.
This operation will not access the cache.
-/
meta def lift {α} (m : tactic α) : ring_exp_m α := reader_t.lift (state_t.lift m)
/--
Change the context of the given computation,
so that expressions are evaluated in the exponent ring,
instead of the base ring.
-/
meta def in_exponent {α} (mx : ring_exp_m α) : ring_exp_m α := do
ctx ← get_context,
reader_t.lift $ mx.run ⟨ctx.info_e, ctx.info_e, ctx.transp⟩
/--
Specialized version of `mk_app` where the first two arguments are `{α}` `[some_class α]`.
Should be faster because it can use the cached instances.
-/
meta def mk_app_class (f : name) (inst : expr) (args : list expr) : ring_exp_m expr := do
ctx ← get_context,
pure $ (@expr.const tt f [ctx.info_b.univ] ctx.info_b.α inst).mk_app args
/--
Specialized version of `mk_app` where the first two arguments are `{α}` `[comm_semiring α]`.
Should be faster because it can use the cached instances.
-/
meta def mk_app_csr (f : name) (args : list expr) : ring_exp_m expr := do
ctx ← get_context,
mk_app_class f (ctx.info_b.csr_instance) args
/--
Specialized version of `mk_app ``has_add.add`.
Should be faster because it can use the cached instances.
-/
meta def mk_add (args : list expr) : ring_exp_m expr := do
ctx ← get_context,
mk_app_class ``has_add.add ctx.info_b.ha_instance args
/--
Specialized version of `mk_app ``has_mul.mul`.
Should be faster because it can use the cached instances.
-/
meta def mk_mul (args : list expr) : ring_exp_m expr := do
ctx ← get_context,
mk_app_class ``has_mul.mul ctx.info_b.hm_instance args
/--
Specialized version of `mk_app ``has_pow.pow`.
Should be faster because it can use the cached instances.
-/
meta def mk_pow (args : list expr) : ring_exp_m expr := do
ctx ← get_context,
pure $ (@expr.const tt ``has_pow.pow
[ctx.info_b.univ, ctx.info_e.univ]
ctx.info_b.α ctx.info_e.α
ctx.info_b.hp_instance).mk_app args
/-- Construct a normalization proof term or return the cached one. -/
meta def ex_info.proof_term (ps : ex_info) : ring_exp_m expr :=
match ps.proof with
| none := lift $ tactic.mk_eq_refl ps.pretty
| (some p) := pure p
end
/-- Construct a normalization proof term or return the cached one. -/
meta def ex.proof_term {et : ex_type} (ps : ex et) : ring_exp_m expr := ps.info.proof_term
/--
If all `ex_info` have trivial proofs, return a trivial proof.
Otherwise, construct all proof terms.
Useful in applications where trivial proofs combine to another trivial proof,
most importantly to pass to `mk_proof_or_refl`.
-/
meta def none_or_proof_term : list ex_info → ring_exp_m (option (list expr))
| [] := pure none
| (x :: xs) := do
xs_pfs ← none_or_proof_term xs,
match (x.proof, xs_pfs) with
| (none, none) := pure none
| (some x_pf, none) := do
xs_pfs ← traverse ex_info.proof_term xs,
pure (some (x_pf :: xs_pfs))
| (_, some xs_pfs) := do
x_pf ← x.proof_term,
pure (some (x_pf :: xs_pfs))
end
/--
Use the proof terms as arguments to the given lemma.
If the lemma could reduce to reflexivity, consider using `mk_proof_or_refl.`
-/
meta def mk_proof (lem : name) (args : list expr) (hs : list ex_info) : ring_exp_m expr := do
hs' ← traverse ex_info.proof_term hs,
mk_app_csr lem (args ++ hs')
/--
Use the proof terms as arguments to the given lemma.
Often, we construct a proof term using congruence where reflexivity suffices.
To solve this, the following function tries to get away with reflexivity.
-/
meta def mk_proof_or_refl (term : expr) (lem : name) (args : list expr) (hs : list ex_info) :
ring_exp_m expr := do
hs_full ← none_or_proof_term hs,
match hs_full with
| none := lift $ mk_eq_refl term
| (some hs') := mk_app_csr lem (args ++ hs')
end
/-- A shortcut for adding the original terms of two expressions. -/
meta def add_orig {et et'} (ps : ex et) (qs : ex et') : ring_exp_m expr :=
mk_add [ps.orig, qs.orig]
/-- A shortcut for multiplying the original terms of two expressions. -/
meta def mul_orig {et et'} (ps : ex et) (qs : ex et') : ring_exp_m expr :=
mk_mul [ps.orig, qs.orig]
/-- A shortcut for exponentiating the original terms of two expressions. -/
meta def pow_orig {et et'} (ps : ex et) (qs : ex et') : ring_exp_m expr :=
mk_pow [ps.orig, qs.orig]
/-- Congruence lemma for constructing `ex.sum`. -/
lemma sum_congr {p p' ps ps' : α} : p = p' → ps = ps' → p + ps = p' + ps' := by cc
/-- Congruence lemma for constructing `ex.prod`. -/
lemma prod_congr {p p' ps ps' : α} : p = p' → ps = ps' → p * ps = p' * ps' := by cc
/-- Congruence lemma for constructing `ex.exp`. -/
lemma exp_congr {p p' : α} {ps ps' : ℕ} : p = p' → ps = ps' → p ^ ps = p' ^ ps' := by cc
/-- Constructs `ex.zero` with the correct arguments. -/
meta def ex_zero : ring_exp_m (ex sum) := do
ctx ← get_context,
pure $ ex.zero ⟨ctx.info_b.zero, ctx.info_b.zero, none⟩
/-- Constructs `ex.sum` with the correct arguments. -/
meta def ex_sum (p : ex prod) (ps : ex sum) : ring_exp_m (ex sum) := do
pps_o ← add_orig p ps,
pps_p ← mk_add [p.pretty, ps.pretty],
pps_pf ← mk_proof_or_refl pps_p ``sum_congr
[p.orig, p.pretty, ps.orig, ps.pretty]
[p.info, ps.info],
pure (ex.sum ⟨pps_o, pps_p, pps_pf⟩ (p.set_info none none) (ps.set_info none none))
/--
Constructs `ex.coeff` with the correct arguments.
There are more efficient constructors for specific numerals:
if `x = 0`, you should use `ex_zero`; if `x = 1`, use `ex_one`.
-/
meta def ex_coeff (x : rat) : ring_exp_m (ex prod) := do
ctx ← get_context,
x_p ← lift $ expr.of_rat ctx.info_b.α x,
pure (ex.coeff ⟨x_p, x_p, none⟩ ⟨x⟩)
/--
Constructs `ex.coeff 1` with the correct arguments.
This is a special case for optimization purposes.
-/
meta def ex_one : ring_exp_m (ex prod) := do
ctx ← get_context,
pure $ ex.coeff ⟨ctx.info_b.one, ctx.info_b.one, none⟩ ⟨1⟩
/-- Constructs `ex.prod` with the correct arguments. -/
meta def ex_prod (p : ex exp) (ps : ex prod) : ring_exp_m (ex prod) := do
pps_o ← mul_orig p ps,
pps_p ← mk_mul [p.pretty, ps.pretty],
pps_pf ← mk_proof_or_refl pps_p ``prod_congr
[p.orig, p.pretty, ps.orig, ps.pretty]
[p.info, ps.info],
pure (ex.prod ⟨pps_o, pps_p, pps_pf⟩ (p.set_info none none) (ps.set_info none none))
/-- Constructs `ex.var` with the correct arguments. -/
meta def ex_var (p : atom) : ring_exp_m (ex base) := pure (ex.var ⟨p.1, p.1, none⟩ p)
/-- Constructs `ex.sum_b` with the correct arguments. -/
meta def ex_sum_b (ps : ex sum) : ring_exp_m (ex base) :=
pure (ex.sum_b ps.info (ps.set_info none none))
/-- Constructs `ex.exp` with the correct arguments. -/
meta def ex_exp (p : ex base) (ps : ex prod) : ring_exp_m (ex exp) := do
ctx ← get_context,
pps_o ← pow_orig p ps,
pps_p ← mk_pow [p.pretty, ps.pretty],
pps_pf ← mk_proof_or_refl pps_p ``exp_congr
[p.orig, p.pretty, ps.orig, ps.pretty]
[p.info, ps.info],
pure (ex.exp ⟨pps_o, pps_p, pps_pf⟩ (p.set_info none none) (ps.set_info none none))
lemma base_to_exp_pf {p p' : α} : p = p' → p = p' ^ 1 := by simp
/-- Conversion from `ex base` to `ex exp`. -/
meta def base_to_exp (p : ex base) : ring_exp_m (ex exp) := do
o ← in_exponent $ ex_one,
ps ← ex_exp p o,
pf ← mk_proof ``base_to_exp_pf [p.orig, p.pretty] [p.info],
pure $ ps.set_info p.orig pf
lemma exp_to_prod_pf {p p' : α} : p = p' → p = p' * 1 := by simp
/-- Conversion from `ex exp` to `ex prod`. -/
meta def exp_to_prod (p : ex exp) : ring_exp_m (ex prod) := do
o ← ex_one,
ps ← ex_prod p o,
pf ← mk_proof ``exp_to_prod_pf [p.orig, p.pretty] [p.info],
pure $ ps.set_info p.orig pf
lemma prod_to_sum_pf {p p' : α} : p = p' → p = p' + 0 := by simp
/-- Conversion from `ex prod` to `ex sum`. -/
meta def prod_to_sum (p : ex prod) : ring_exp_m (ex sum) := do
z ← ex_zero,
ps ← ex_sum p z,
pf ← mk_proof ``prod_to_sum_pf [p.orig, p.pretty] [p.info],
pure $ ps.set_info p.orig pf
lemma atom_to_sum_pf (p : α) : p = p ^ 1 * 1 + 0 := by simp
/--
A more efficient conversion from `atom` to `ex sum`.
The result should be the same as `ex_var p >>= base_to_exp >>= exp_to_prod >>= prod_to_sum`,
except we need to calculate less intermediate steps.
-/
meta def atom_to_sum (p : atom) : ring_exp_m (ex sum) := do
p' ← ex_var p,
o ← in_exponent $ ex_one,
p' ← ex_exp p' o,
o ← ex_one,
p' ← ex_prod p' o,
z ← ex_zero,
p' ← ex_sum p' z,
pf ← mk_proof ``atom_to_sum_pf [p.1] [],
pure $ p'.set_info p.1 pf
/--
Compute the sum of two coefficients.
Note that the result might not be a valid expression:
if `p = -q`, then the result should be `ex.zero : ex sum` instead.
The caller must detect when this happens!
The returned value is of the form `ex.coeff _ (p + q)`,
with the proof of `expr.of_rat p + expr.of_rat q = expr.of_rat (p + q)`.
-/
meta def add_coeff (p_p q_p : expr) (p q : coeff) : ring_exp_m (ex prod) := do
ctx ← get_context,
pq_o ← mk_add [p_p, q_p],
(pq_p, pq_pf) ← lift $ norm_num.derive' pq_o,
pure $ ex.coeff ⟨pq_o, pq_p, pq_pf⟩ ⟨p.1 + q.1⟩
lemma mul_coeff_pf_one_mul (q : α) : 1 * q = q := one_mul q
lemma mul_coeff_pf_mul_one (p : α) : p * 1 = p := mul_one p
/--
Compute the product of two coefficients.
The returned value is of the form `ex.coeff _ (p * q)`,
with the proof of `expr.of_rat p * expr.of_rat q = expr.of_rat (p * q)`.
-/
meta def mul_coeff (p_p q_p : expr) (p q : coeff) : ring_exp_m (ex prod) :=
match p.1, q.1 with -- Special case to speed up multiplication with 1.
| ⟨1, 1, _, _⟩, _ := do
ctx ← get_context,
pq_o ← mk_mul [p_p, q_p],
pf ← mk_app_csr ``mul_coeff_pf_one_mul [q_p],
pure $ ex.coeff ⟨pq_o, q_p, pf⟩ ⟨q.1⟩
| _, ⟨1, 1, _, _⟩ := do
ctx ← get_context,
pq_o ← mk_mul [p_p, q_p],
pf ← mk_app_csr ``mul_coeff_pf_mul_one [p_p],
pure $ ex.coeff ⟨pq_o, p_p, pf⟩ ⟨p.1⟩
| _, _ := do
ctx ← get_context,
pq' ← mk_mul [p_p, q_p],
(pq_p, pq_pf) ← lift $ norm_num.derive' pq',
pure $ ex.coeff ⟨pq_p, pq_p, pq_pf⟩ ⟨p.1 * q.1⟩
end
/--
Represents the way in which two products are equal except coefficient.
This type is used in the function `add_overlap`.
In order to deal with equations of the form `a * 2 + a = 3 * a`,
the `add` function will add up overlapping products,
turning `a * 2 + a` into `a * 3`.
We need to distinguish `a * 2 + a` from `a * 2 + b` in order to do this,
and the `overlap` type carries the information on how it overlaps.
The case `none` corresponds to non-overlapping products, e.g. `a * 2 + b`;
the case `nonzero` to overlapping products adding to non-zero, e.g. `a * 2 + a`
(the `ex prod` field will then look like `a * 3` with a proof that `a * 2 + a = a * 3`);
the case `zero` to overlapping products adding to zero, e.g. `a * 2 + a * -2`.
We distinguish those two cases because in the second, the whole product reduces to `0`.
A potential extension to the tactic would also do this for the base of exponents,
e.g. to show `2^n * 2^n = 4^n`.
-/
meta inductive overlap : Type
| none : overlap
| nonzero : ex prod → overlap
| zero : ex sum → overlap
lemma add_overlap_pf {ps qs pq} (p : α) : ps + qs = pq → p * ps + p * qs = p * pq := λ pq_pf, calc
p * ps + p * qs = p * (ps + qs) : symm (mul_add _ _ _)
... = p * pq : by rw pq_pf
lemma add_overlap_pf_zero {ps qs} (p : α) : ps + qs = 0 → p * ps + p * qs = 0 := λ pq_pf, calc
p * ps + p * qs = p * (ps + qs) : symm (mul_add _ _ _)
... = p * 0 : by rw pq_pf
... = 0 : mul_zero _
/--
Given arguments `ps`, `qs` of the form `ps' * x` and `ps' * y` respectively
return `ps + qs = ps' * (x + y)` (with `x` and `y` arbitrary coefficients).
For other arguments, return `overlap.none`.
-/
meta def add_overlap : ex prod → ex prod → ring_exp_m overlap
| (ex.coeff x_i x) (ex.coeff y_i y) := do
xy@(ex.coeff _ xy_c) ← add_coeff x_i.pretty y_i.pretty x y
| lift $ fail "internal error: add_coeff should return ex.coeff",
if xy_c.1 = 0
then do
z ← ex_zero,
pure $ overlap.zero (z.set_info xy.orig xy.proof)
else pure $ overlap.nonzero xy
| (ex.prod _ _ _) (ex.coeff _ _) := pure overlap.none
| (ex.coeff _ _) (ex.prod _ _ _) := pure overlap.none
| pps@(ex.prod _ p ps) qqs@(ex.prod _ q qs) := if p.eq q
then do
pq_ol ← add_overlap ps qs,
pqs_o ← add_orig pps qqs,
match pq_ol with
| overlap.none := pure overlap.none
| (overlap.nonzero pq) := do
pqs ← ex_prod p pq,
pf ← mk_proof ``add_overlap_pf
[ps.pretty, qs.pretty, pq.pretty, p.pretty]
[pq.info],
pure $ overlap.nonzero (pqs.set_info pqs_o pf)
| (overlap.zero pq) := do
z ← ex_zero,
pf ← mk_proof ``add_overlap_pf_zero
[ps.pretty, qs.pretty, p.pretty]
[pq.info],
pure $ overlap.zero (z.set_info pqs_o pf)
end
else pure overlap.none
section addition
lemma add_pf_z_sum {ps qs qs' : α} : ps = 0 → qs = qs' → ps + qs = qs' := λ ps_pf qs_pf, calc
ps + qs = 0 + qs' : by rw [ps_pf, qs_pf]
... = qs' : zero_add _
lemma add_pf_sum_z {ps ps' qs : α} : ps = ps' → qs = 0 → ps + qs = ps' := λ ps_pf qs_pf, calc
ps + qs = ps' + 0 : by rw [ps_pf, qs_pf]
... = ps' : add_zero _
lemma add_pf_sum_overlap {pps p ps qqs q qs pq pqs : α} :
pps = p + ps → qqs = q + qs → p + q = pq → ps + qs = pqs → pps + qqs = pq + pqs := by cc
lemma add_pf_sum_overlap_zero {pps p ps qqs q qs pqs : α} :
pps = p + ps → qqs = q + qs → p + q = 0 → ps + qs = pqs → pps + qqs = pqs :=
λ pps_pf qqs_pf pq_pf pqs_pf, calc
pps + qqs = (p + ps) + (q + qs) : by rw [pps_pf, qqs_pf]
... = (p + q) + (ps + qs) : by cc
... = 0 + pqs : by rw [pq_pf, pqs_pf]
... = pqs : zero_add _
lemma add_pf_sum_lt {pps p ps qqs pqs : α} :
pps = p + ps → ps + qqs = pqs → pps + qqs = p + pqs := by cc
lemma add_pf_sum_gt {pps qqs q qs pqs : α} :
qqs = q + qs → pps + qs = pqs → pps + qqs = q + pqs := by cc
/--
Add two expressions.
* `0 + qs = 0`
* `ps + 0 = 0`
* `ps * x + ps * y = ps * (x + y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients; uses `add_overlap`)
* `(p + ps) + (q + qs) = p + (ps + (q + qs))` (if `p.lt q`)
* `(p + ps) + (q + qs) = q + ((p + ps) + qs)` (if not `p.lt q`)
-/
meta def add : ex sum → ex sum → ring_exp_m (ex sum)
| ps@(ex.zero ps_i) qs := do
pf ← mk_proof ``add_pf_z_sum [ps.orig, qs.orig, qs.pretty] [ps.info, qs.info],
pqs_o ← add_orig ps qs,
pure $ qs.set_info pqs_o pf
| ps qs@(ex.zero qs_i) := do
pf ← mk_proof ``add_pf_sum_z [ps.orig, ps.pretty, qs.orig] [ps.info, qs.info],
pqs_o ← add_orig ps qs,
pure $ ps.set_info pqs_o pf
| pps@(ex.sum pps_i p ps) qqs@(ex.sum qqs_i q qs) := do
ol ← add_overlap p q,
ppqqs_o ← add_orig pps qqs,
match ol with
| (overlap.nonzero pq) := do
pqs ← add ps qs,
pqqs ← ex_sum pq pqs,
qqs_pf ← qqs.proof_term,
pf ← mk_proof ``add_pf_sum_overlap
[pps.orig, p.pretty, ps.pretty, qqs.orig, q.pretty, qs.pretty, pq.pretty, pqs.pretty]
[pps.info, qqs.info, pq.info, pqs.info],
pure $ pqqs.set_info ppqqs_o pf
| (overlap.zero pq) := do
pqs ← add ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``add_pf_sum_overlap_zero
[pps.orig, p.pretty, ps.pretty, qqs.orig, q.pretty, qs.pretty, pqs.pretty]
[pps.info, qqs.info, pq.info, pqs.info],
pure $ pqs.set_info ppqqs_o pf
| overlap.none := if p.lt q
then do
pqs ← add ps qqs,
ppqs ← ex_sum p pqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``add_pf_sum_lt
[pps.orig, p.pretty, ps.pretty, qqs.orig, pqs.pretty]
[pps.info, pqs.info],
pure $ ppqs.set_info ppqqs_o pf
else do
pqs ← add pps qs,
pqqs ← ex_sum q pqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``add_pf_sum_gt
[pps.orig, qqs.orig, q.pretty, qs.pretty, pqs.pretty]
[qqs.info, pqs.info],
pure $ pqqs.set_info ppqqs_o pf
end
end addition
section multiplication
lemma mul_pf_c_c {ps ps' qs qs' pq : α} :
ps = ps' → qs = qs' → ps' * qs' = pq → ps * qs = pq := by cc
lemma mul_pf_c_prod {ps qqs q qs pqs : α} :
qqs = q * qs → ps * qs = pqs → ps * qqs = q * pqs := by cc
lemma mul_pf_prod_c {pps p ps qs pqs : α} :
pps = p * ps → ps * qs = pqs → pps * qs = p * pqs := by cc
lemma mul_pp_pf_overlap {pps p_b ps qqs qs psqs : α} {p_e q_e : ℕ} :
pps = p_b ^ p_e * ps → qqs = p_b ^ q_e * qs →
p_b ^ (p_e + q_e) * (ps * qs) = psqs → pps * qqs = psqs
:= λ ps_pf qs_pf psqs_pf, by simp [symm psqs_pf, _root_.pow_add, ps_pf, qs_pf]; ac_refl
lemma mul_pp_pf_prod_lt {pps p ps qqs pqs : α} :
pps = p * ps → ps * qqs = pqs → pps * qqs = p * pqs := by cc
lemma mul_pp_pf_prod_gt {pps qqs q qs pqs : α} :
qqs = q * qs → pps * qs = pqs → pps * qqs = q * pqs := by cc
/--
Multiply two expressions.
* `x * y = (x * y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients)
* `x * (q * qs) = q * (qs * x)` (for `x` coefficient)
* `(p * ps) * y = p * (ps * y)` (for `y` coefficient)
* `(p_b^p_e * ps) * (p_b^q_e * qs) = p_b^(p_e + q_e) * (ps * qs)`
(if `p_e` and `q_e` are identical except coefficient)
* `(p * ps) * (q * qs) = p * (ps * (q * qs))` (if `p.lt q`)
* `(p * ps) * (q * qs) = q * ((p * ps) * qs)` (if not `p.lt q`)
-/
meta def mul_pp : ex prod → ex prod → ring_exp_m (ex prod)
| ps@(ex.coeff _ x) qs@(ex.coeff _ y) := do
pq ← mul_coeff ps.pretty qs.pretty x y,
pq_o ← mul_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof_or_refl pq.pretty ``mul_pf_c_c
[ps.orig, ps.pretty, qs.orig, qs.pretty, pq.pretty]
[ps.info, qs.info, pq.info],
pure $ pq.set_info pq_o pf
| ps@(ex.coeff _ x) qqs@(ex.prod _ q qs) := do
pqs ← mul_pp ps qs,
pqqs ← ex_prod q pqs,
pqqs_o ← mul_orig ps qqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_pf_c_prod
[ps.orig, qqs.orig, q.pretty, qs.pretty, pqs.pretty]
[qqs.info, pqs.info],
pure $ pqqs.set_info pqqs_o pf
| pps@(ex.prod _ p ps) qs@(ex.coeff _ y) := do
pqs ← mul_pp ps qs,
ppqs ← ex_prod p pqs,
ppqs_o ← mul_orig pps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_pf_prod_c
[pps.orig, p.pretty, ps.pretty, qs.orig, pqs.pretty]
[pps.info, pqs.info],
pure $ ppqs.set_info ppqs_o pf
| pps@(ex.prod _ p@(ex.exp _ p_b p_e) ps) qqs@(ex.prod _ q@(ex.exp _ q_b q_e) qs) := do
ppqqs_o ← mul_orig pps qqs,
pq_ol ← in_exponent $ add_overlap p_e q_e,
match pq_ol, p_b.eq q_b with
| (overlap.nonzero pq_e), tt := do
psqs ← mul_pp ps qs,
pq ← ex_exp p_b pq_e,
ppsqqs ← ex_prod pq psqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_pp_pf_overlap
[pps.orig, p_b.pretty, ps.pretty, qqs.orig, qs.pretty, ppsqqs.pretty, p_e.pretty, q_e.pretty]
[pps.info, qqs.info, ppsqqs.info],
pure $ ppsqqs.set_info ppqqs_o pf
| _, _ := if p.lt q then do
pqs ← mul_pp ps qqs,
ppqs ← ex_prod p pqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_pp_pf_prod_lt
[pps.orig, p.pretty, ps.pretty, qqs.orig, pqs.pretty]
[pps.info, pqs.info],
pure $ ppqs.set_info ppqqs_o pf
else do
pqs ← mul_pp pps qs,
pqqs ← ex_prod q pqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_pp_pf_prod_gt
[pps.orig, qqs.orig, q.pretty, qs.pretty, pqs.pretty]
[qqs.info, pqs.info],
pure $ pqqs.set_info ppqqs_o pf
end
lemma mul_p_pf_zero {ps qs : α} : ps = 0 → ps * qs = 0 :=
λ ps_pf, by rw [ps_pf, zero_mul]
lemma mul_p_pf_sum {pps p ps qs ppsqs : α} : pps = p + ps →
p * qs + ps * qs = ppsqs → pps * qs = ppsqs := λ pps_pf ppsqs_pf, calc
pps * qs = (p + ps) * qs : by rw [pps_pf]
... = p * qs + ps * qs : add_mul _ _ _
... = ppsqs : ppsqs_pf
/--
Multiply two expressions.
* `0 * qs = 0`
* `(p + ps) * qs = (p * qs) + (ps * qs)`
-/
meta def mul_p : ex sum → ex prod → ring_exp_m (ex sum)
| ps@(ex.zero ps_i) qs := do
z ← ex_zero,
z_o ← mul_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_p_pf_zero [ps.orig, qs.orig] [ps.info],
pure $ z.set_info z_o pf
| pps@(ex.sum pps_i p ps) qs := do
pqs ← mul_pp p qs >>= prod_to_sum,
psqs ← mul_p ps qs,
ppsqs ← add pqs psqs,
pps_pf ← pps.proof_term,
ppsqs_o ← mul_orig pps qs,
ppsqs_pf ← ppsqs.proof_term,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_p_pf_sum
[pps.orig, p.pretty, ps.pretty, qs.orig, ppsqs.pretty]
[pps.info, ppsqs.info],
pure $ ppsqs.set_info ppsqs_o pf
lemma mul_pf_zero {ps qs : α} : qs = 0 → ps * qs = 0 :=
λ qs_pf, by rw [qs_pf, mul_zero]
lemma mul_pf_sum {ps qqs q qs psqqs : α} : qqs = q + qs → ps * q + ps * qs = psqqs →
ps * qqs = psqqs := λ qs_pf psqqs_pf, calc
ps * qqs = ps * (q + qs) : by rw [qs_pf]
... = ps * q + ps * qs : mul_add _ _ _
... = psqqs : psqqs_pf
/--
Multiply two expressions.
* `ps * 0 = 0`
* `ps * (q + qs) = (ps * q) + (ps * qs)`
-/
meta def mul : ex sum → ex sum → ring_exp_m (ex sum)
| ps qs@(ex.zero qs_i) := do
z ← ex_zero,
z_o ← mul_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_pf_zero [ps.orig, qs.orig] [qs.info],
pure $ z.set_info z_o pf
| ps qqs@(ex.sum qqs_i q qs) := do
psq ← mul_p ps q,
psqs ← mul ps qs,
psqqs ← add psq psqs,
psqqs_o ← mul_orig ps qqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``mul_pf_sum
[ps.orig, qqs.orig, q.orig, qs.orig, psqqs.pretty]
[qqs.info, psqqs.info],
pure $ psqqs.set_info psqqs_o pf
end multiplication
section exponentiation
lemma pow_e_pf_exp {pps p : α} {ps qs psqs : ℕ} :
pps = p ^ ps → ps * qs = psqs → pps ^ qs = p ^ psqs :=
λ pps_pf psqs_pf, calc
pps ^ qs = (p ^ ps) ^ qs : by rw [pps_pf]
... = p ^ (ps * qs) : symm (pow_mul _ _ _)
... = p ^ psqs : by rw [psqs_pf]
/--
Compute the exponentiation of two coefficients.
The returned value is of the form `ex.coeff _ (p ^ q)`,
with the proof of `expr.of_rat p ^ expr.of_rat q = expr.of_rat (p ^ q)`.
-/
meta def pow_coeff (p_p q_p : expr) (p q : coeff) : ring_exp_m (ex prod) := do
ctx ← get_context,
pq' ← mk_pow [p_p, q_p],
(pq_p, pq_pf) ← lift $ norm_num.derive' pq',
pure $ ex.coeff ⟨pq_p, pq_p, pq_pf⟩ ⟨p.1 * q.1⟩
/--
Exponentiate two expressions.
* `(p ^ ps) ^ qs = p ^ (ps * qs)`
-/
meta def pow_e : ex exp → ex prod → ring_exp_m (ex exp)
| pps@(ex.exp pps_i p ps) qs := do
psqs ← in_exponent $ mul_pp ps qs,
ppsqs ← ex_exp p psqs,
ppsqs_o ← pow_orig pps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_e_pf_exp
[pps.orig, p.pretty, ps.pretty, qs.orig, psqs.pretty]
[pps.info, psqs.info],
pure $ ppsqs.set_info ppsqs_o pf
lemma pow_pp_pf_one {ps : α} {qs : ℕ} : ps = 1 → ps ^ qs = 1 :=
λ ps_pf, by rw [ps_pf, _root_.one_pow]
lemma pow_pf_c_c {ps ps' pq : α} {qs qs' : ℕ} :
ps = ps' → qs = qs' → ps' ^ qs' = pq → ps ^ qs = pq := by cc
lemma pow_pp_pf_c {ps ps' pqs : α} {qs qs' : ℕ} :
ps = ps' → qs = qs' → ps' ^ qs' = pqs → ps ^ qs = pqs * 1 :=
by simp; cc
lemma pow_pp_pf_prod {pps p ps pqs psqs : α} {qs : ℕ} : pps = p * ps →
p ^ qs = pqs → ps ^ qs = psqs → pps ^ qs = pqs * psqs :=
λ pps_pf pqs_pf psqs_pf, calc
pps ^ qs = (p * ps) ^ qs : by rw [pps_pf]
... = p ^ qs * ps ^ qs : mul_pow _ _ _
... = pqs * psqs : by rw [pqs_pf, psqs_pf]
/--
Exponentiate two expressions.
* `1 ^ qs = 1`
* `x ^ qs = x ^ qs` (for `x` coefficient)
* `(p * ps) ^ qs = p ^ qs + ps ^ qs`
-/
meta def pow_pp : ex prod → ex prod → ring_exp_m (ex prod)
| ps@(ex.coeff ps_i ⟨⟨1, 1, _, _⟩⟩) qs := do
o ← ex_one,
o_o ← pow_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_pp_pf_one [ps.orig, qs.orig] [ps.info],
pure $ o.set_info o_o pf
| ps@(ex.coeff ps_i x) qs@(ex.coeff qs_i y) := do
pq ← pow_coeff ps.pretty qs.pretty x y,
pq_o ← pow_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof_or_refl pq.pretty ``pow_pf_c_c
[ps.orig, ps.pretty, pq.pretty, qs.orig, qs.pretty]
[ps.info, qs.info, pq.info],
pure $ pq.set_info pq_o pf
| ps@(ex.coeff ps_i x) qs := do
ps'' ← pure ps >>= prod_to_sum >>= ex_sum_b,
pqs ← ex_exp ps'' qs,
pqs_o ← pow_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof_or_refl pqs.pretty ``pow_pp_pf_c
[ps.orig, ps.pretty, pqs.pretty, qs.orig, qs.pretty]
[ps.info, qs.info, pqs.info],
pqs' ← exp_to_prod pqs,
pure $ pqs'.set_info pqs_o pf
| pps@(ex.prod pps_i p ps) qs := do
pqs ← pow_e p qs,
psqs ← pow_pp ps qs,
ppsqs ← ex_prod pqs psqs,
ppsqs_o ← pow_orig pps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_pp_pf_prod
[pps.orig, p.pretty, ps.pretty, pqs.pretty, psqs.pretty, qs.orig]
[pps.info, pqs.info, psqs.info],
pure $ ppsqs.set_info ppsqs_o pf
lemma pow_p_pf_one {ps ps' : α} {qs : ℕ} : ps = ps' → qs = succ zero → ps ^ qs = ps' :=
λ ps_pf qs_pf, calc
ps ^ qs = ps' ^ 1 : by rw [ps_pf, qs_pf]
... = ps' : pow_one _
lemma pow_p_pf_zero {ps : α} {qs qs' : ℕ} : ps = 0 → qs = succ qs' → ps ^ qs = 0 :=
λ ps_pf qs_pf, calc
ps ^ qs = 0 ^ (succ qs') : by rw [ps_pf, qs_pf]
... = 0 : zero_pow (succ_pos qs')
lemma pow_p_pf_succ {ps pqqs : α} {qs qs' : ℕ} :
qs = succ qs' → ps * ps ^ qs' = pqqs → ps ^ qs = pqqs :=
λ qs_pf pqqs_pf, calc
ps ^ qs = ps ^ succ qs' : by rw [qs_pf]
... = ps * ps ^ qs' : pow_succ _ _
... = pqqs : by rw [pqqs_pf]
lemma pow_p_pf_singleton {pps p pqs : α} {qs : ℕ} :
pps = p + 0 → p ^ qs = pqs → pps ^ qs = pqs :=
λ pps_pf pqs_pf, by rw [pps_pf, add_zero, pqs_pf]
lemma pow_p_pf_cons {ps ps' : α} {qs qs' : ℕ} :
ps = ps' → qs = qs' → ps ^ qs = ps' ^ qs' := by cc
/--
Exponentiate two expressions.
* `ps ^ 1 = ps`
* `0 ^ qs = 0` (note that this is handled *after* `ps ^ 0 = 1`)
* `(p + 0) ^ qs = p ^ qs`
* `ps ^ (qs + 1) = ps * ps ^ qs` (note that this is handled *after* `p + 0 ^ qs = p ^ qs`)
* `ps ^ qs = ps ^ qs` (otherwise)
-/
meta def pow_p : ex sum → ex prod → ring_exp_m (ex sum)
| ps qs@(ex.coeff qs_i ⟨⟨1, 1, _, _⟩⟩) := do
ps_o ← pow_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_p_pf_one [ps.orig, ps.pretty, qs.orig] [ps.info, qs.info],
pure $ ps.set_info ps_o pf
| ps@(ex.zero ps_i) qs@(ex.coeff qs_i ⟨⟨succ y, 1, _, _⟩⟩) := do
ctx ← get_context,
z ← ex_zero,
qs_pred ← lift $ expr.of_nat ctx.info_e.α y,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_p_pf_zero [ps.orig, qs.orig, qs_pred] [ps.info, qs.info],
z_o ← pow_orig ps qs,
pure $ z.set_info z_o pf
| pps@(ex.sum pps_i p (ex.zero _)) qqs := do
pqs ← pow_pp p qqs,
pqs_o ← pow_orig pps qqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_p_pf_singleton
[pps.orig, p.pretty, pqs.pretty, qqs.orig]
[pps.info, pqs.info],
prod_to_sum $ pqs.set_info pqs_o pf
| ps qs@(ex.coeff qs_i ⟨⟨int.of_nat (succ n), 1, den_pos, _⟩⟩) := do
qs' ← in_exponent $ ex_coeff ⟨int.of_nat n, 1, den_pos, coprime_one_right _⟩,
pqs ← pow_p ps qs',
pqqs ← mul ps pqs,
pqqs_o ← pow_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_p_pf_succ
[ps.orig, pqqs.pretty, qs.orig, qs'.pretty]
[qs.info, pqqs.info],
pure $ pqqs.set_info pqqs_o pf
| pps qqs := do -- fallback: treat them as atoms
pps' ← ex_sum_b pps,
psqs ← ex_exp pps' qqs,
psqs_o ← pow_orig pps qqs,
pf ← mk_proof_or_refl psqs.pretty ``pow_p_pf_cons
[pps.orig, pps.pretty, qqs.orig, qqs.pretty]
[pps.info, qqs.info],
exp_to_prod (psqs.set_info psqs_o pf) >>= prod_to_sum
lemma pow_pf_zero {ps : α} {qs : ℕ} : qs = 0 → ps ^ qs = 1 := λ qs_pf, calc
ps ^ qs = ps ^ 0 : by rw [qs_pf]
... = 1 : pow_zero _
lemma pow_pf_sum {ps psqqs : α} {qqs q qs : ℕ} : qqs = q + qs →
ps ^ q * ps ^ qs = psqqs → ps ^ qqs = psqqs := λ qqs_pf psqqs_pf, calc
ps ^ qqs = ps ^ (q + qs) : by rw [qqs_pf]
... = ps ^ q * ps ^ qs : pow_add _ _ _
... = psqqs : psqqs_pf
/--
Exponentiate two expressions.
* `ps ^ 0 = 1`
* `ps ^ (q + qs) = ps ^ q * ps ^ qs`
-/
meta def pow : ex sum → ex sum → ring_exp_m (ex sum)
| ps qs@(ex.zero qs_i) := do
o ← ex_one,
o_o ← pow_orig ps qs,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_pf_zero [ps.orig, qs.orig] [qs.info],
prod_to_sum $ o.set_info o_o pf
| ps qqs@(ex.sum qqs_i q qs) := do
psq ← pow_p ps q,
psqs ← pow ps qs,
psqqs ← mul psq psqs,
psqqs_o ← pow_orig ps qqs,
pf ← mk_proof ``pow_pf_sum
[ps.orig, psqqs.pretty, qqs.orig, q.pretty, qs.pretty]
[qqs.info, psqqs.info],
pure $ psqqs.set_info psqqs_o pf
end exponentiation
lemma simple_pf_sum_zero {p p' : α} : p = p' → p + 0 = p' := by simp
lemma simple_pf_prod_one {p p' : α} : p = p' → p * 1 = p' := by simp
lemma simple_pf_prod_neg_one {α} [ring α] {p p' : α} : p = p' → p * -1 = - p' := by simp
lemma simple_pf_var_one (p : α) : p ^ 1 = p := by simp
lemma simple_pf_exp_one {p p' : α} : p = p' → p ^ 1 = p' := by simp
/--
Give a simpler, more human-readable representation of the normalized expression.
Normalized expressions might have the form `a^1 * 1 + 0`,
since the dummy operations reduce special cases in pattern-matching.
Humans prefer to read `a` instead.
This tactic gets rid of the dummy additions, multiplications and exponentiations.
-/
meta def ex.simple : Π {et : ex_type}, ex et → ring_exp_m (expr × expr)
| sum pps@(ex.sum pps_i p (ex.zero _)) := do
(p_p, p_pf) ← p.simple,
prod.mk p_p <$> mk_app_csr ``simple_pf_sum_zero [p.pretty, p_p, p_pf]
| sum (ex.sum pps_i p ps) := do
(p_p, p_pf) ← p.simple,
(ps_p, ps_pf) ← ps.simple,
prod.mk
<$> mk_add [p_p, ps_p]
<*> mk_app_csr ``sum_congr [p.pretty, p_p, ps.pretty, ps_p, p_pf, ps_pf]
| prod (ex.prod pps_i p (ex.coeff _ ⟨⟨1, 1, _, _⟩⟩)) := do
(p_p, p_pf) ← p.simple,
prod.mk p_p <$> mk_app_csr ``simple_pf_prod_one [p.pretty, p_p, p_pf]
| prod pps@(ex.prod pps_i p (ex.coeff _ ⟨⟨-1, 1, _, _⟩⟩)) := do
ctx ← get_context,
match ctx.info_b.ring_instance with
| none := prod.mk pps.pretty <$> pps.proof_term
| (some ringi) := do
(p_p, p_pf) ← p.simple,
prod.mk
<$> lift (mk_app ``has_neg.neg [p_p])
<*> mk_app_class ``simple_pf_prod_neg_one ringi [p.pretty, p_p, p_pf]
end
| prod (ex.prod pps_i p ps) := do
(p_p, p_pf) ← p.simple,
(ps_p, ps_pf) ← ps.simple,
prod.mk
<$> mk_mul [p_p, ps_p]
<*> mk_app_csr ``prod_congr [p.pretty, p_p, ps.pretty, ps_p, p_pf, ps_pf]
| base (ex.sum_b pps_i ps) := ps.simple
| exp (ex.exp pps_i p (ex.coeff _ ⟨⟨1, 1, _, _⟩⟩)) := do
(p_p, p_pf) ← p.simple,
prod.mk p_p <$> mk_app_csr ``simple_pf_exp_one [p.pretty, p_p, p_pf]
| exp (ex.exp pps_i p ps) := do
(p_p, p_pf) ← p.simple,
(ps_p, ps_pf) ← in_exponent $ ps.simple,
prod.mk
<$> mk_pow [p_p, ps_p]
<*> mk_app_csr ``exp_congr [p.pretty, p_p, ps.pretty, ps_p, p_pf, ps_pf]
| et ps := prod.mk ps.pretty <$> ps.proof_term
/--
Performs a lookup of the atom `a` in the list of known atoms,
or allocates a new one.
If `a` is not definitionally equal to any of the list's entries,
a new atom is appended to the list and returned.
The index of this atom is kept track of in the second inductive argument.
This function is mostly useful in `resolve_atom`,
which updates the state with the new list of atoms.
-/
meta def resolve_atom_aux (a : expr) : list atom → ℕ → ring_exp_m (atom × list atom)
| [] n := let atm : atom := ⟨a, n⟩ in pure (atm, [atm])
| bas@(b :: as) n := do
ctx ← get_context,
(lift $ is_def_eq a b.value ctx.transp >> pure (b , bas)) <|> do
(atm, as') ← resolve_atom_aux as (succ n),
pure (atm, b :: as')
/--
Convert the expression to an atom:
either look up a definitionally equal atom,
or allocate it as a new atom.
You probably want to use `eval_base` if `eval` doesn't work
instead of directly calling `resolve_atom`,
since `eval_base` can also handle numerals.
-/
meta def resolve_atom (a : expr) : ring_exp_m atom := do
atoms ← reader_t.lift $ state_t.get,
(atm, atoms') ← resolve_atom_aux a atoms 0,
reader_t.lift $ state_t.put atoms',
pure atm
/--
Treat the expression atomically: as a coefficient or atom.
Handles cases where `eval` cannot treat the expression as a known operation
because it is just a number or single variable.
-/
meta def eval_base (ps : expr) : ring_exp_m (ex sum) :=
match ps.to_rat with
| some ⟨0, 1, _, _⟩ := ex_zero
| some x := ex_coeff x >>= prod_to_sum
| none := do
a ← resolve_atom ps,
atom_to_sum a
end
lemma negate_pf {α} [ring α] {ps ps' : α} : (-1) * ps = ps' → -ps = ps' := by simp
/--
Negate an expression by multiplying with `-1`.
Only works if there is a `ring` instance; otherwise it will `fail`.
-/
meta def negate (ps : ex sum) : ring_exp_m (ex sum) := do
ctx ← get_context,
match ctx.info_b.ring_instance with
| none := lift $ fail "internal error: negate called in semiring"
| (some ring_instance) := do
minus_one ← ex_coeff (-1) >>= prod_to_sum,
ps' ← mul minus_one ps,
ps_pf ← ps'.proof_term,
pf ← mk_app_class ``negate_pf ring_instance [ps.orig, ps'.pretty, ps_pf],
ps'_o ← lift $ mk_app ``has_neg.neg [ps.orig],
pure $ ps'.set_info ps'_o pf
end
lemma inverse_pf {α} [division_ring α] {ps ps_u ps_p e' e'' : α} :
ps = ps_u → ps_u = ps_p → ps_p ⁻¹ = e' → e' = e'' → ps ⁻¹ = e'' :=
by cc
/--
Invert an expression by simplifying, applying `has_inv.inv` and treating the result as an atom.
Only works if there is a `division_ring` instance; otherwise it will `fail`.
-/
meta def inverse (ps : ex sum) : ring_exp_m (ex sum) := do
ctx ← get_context,
dri ← match ctx.info_b.dr_instance with
| none := lift $ fail "division is only supported in a division ring"
| (some dri) := pure dri
end,
(ps_simple, ps_simple_pf) ← ps.simple,
e ← lift $ mk_app ``has_inv.inv [ps_simple],
(e', e_pf) ← lift (norm_num.derive e) <|> ((λ e_pf, (e, e_pf)) <$> lift (mk_eq_refl e)),
e'' ← eval_base e',
ps_pf ← ps.proof_term,
e''_pf ← e''.proof_term,
pf ← mk_app_class ``inverse_pf dri
[ ps.orig, ps.pretty, ps_simple, e', e''.pretty,
ps_pf, ps_simple_pf, e_pf, e''_pf],
e''_o ← lift $ mk_app ``has_inv.inv [ps.orig],
pure $ e''.set_info e''_o pf
lemma sub_pf {α} [ring α] {ps qs psqs : α} : ps + -qs = psqs → ps - qs = psqs := id
lemma div_pf {α} [division_ring α] {ps qs psqs : α} : ps * qs⁻¹ = psqs → ps / qs = psqs := id
end operations
section wiring
/-!
### `wiring` section
This section deals with going from `expr` to `ex` and back.
The main attraction is `eval`, which uses `add`, `mul`, etc.
to calculate an `ex` from a given `expr`.
Other functions use `ex`es to produce `expr`s together with a proof,
or produce the context to run `ring_exp_m` from an `expr`.
-/
open tactic
open ex_type
/--
Compute a normalized form (of type `ex`) from an expression (of type `expr`).
This is the main driver of the `ring_exp` tactic,
calling out to `add`, `mul`, `pow`, etc. to parse the `expr`.
-/
meta def eval : expr → ring_exp_m (ex sum)
| e@`(%%ps + %%qs) := do
ps' ← eval ps,
qs' ← eval qs,
add ps' qs'
| e@`(%%ps - %%qs) := (do
ctx ← get_context,
ri ← match ctx.info_b.ring_instance with
| none := lift $ fail "subtraction is not directly supported in a semiring"
| (some ri) := pure ri
end,
ps' ← eval ps,
qs' ← eval qs >>= negate,
psqs ← add ps' qs',
psqs_pf ← psqs.proof_term,
pf ← mk_app_class ``sub_pf ri [ps, qs, psqs.pretty, psqs_pf],
pure (psqs.set_info e pf)) <|> eval_base e
| e@`(- %%ps) := do
ps' ← eval ps,
negate ps' <|> eval_base e
| e@`(%%ps * %%qs) := do
ps' ← eval ps,
qs' ← eval qs,
mul ps' qs'
| e@`(has_inv.inv %%ps) := do
ps' ← eval ps,
inverse ps' <|> eval_base e
| e@`(%%ps / %%qs) := do
ctx ← get_context,
dri ← match ctx.info_b.dr_instance with
| none := lift $ fail "division is only directly supported in a division ring"
| (some dri) := pure dri
end,
ps' ← eval ps,
qs' ← eval qs,
(do qs'' ← inverse qs',
psqs ← mul ps' qs'',
psqs_pf ← psqs.proof_term,
pf ← mk_app_class ``div_pf dri [ps, qs, psqs.pretty, psqs_pf],
pure (psqs.set_info e pf)) <|> eval_base e
| e@`(@has_pow.pow _ _ %%hp_instance %%ps %%qs) := do
ps' ← eval ps,
qs' ← in_exponent $ eval qs,
psqs ← pow ps' qs',
psqs_pf ← psqs.proof_term,
(do has_pow_pf ← match hp_instance with
| `(monoid.has_pow) := lift $ mk_eq_refl e
| `(nat.has_pow) := lift $ mk_app ``nat.pow_eq_pow [ps, qs] >>= mk_eq_symm
| _ := lift $ fail "has_pow instance must be nat.has_pow or monoid.has_pow"
end,
pf ← lift $ mk_eq_trans has_pow_pf psqs_pf,
pure $ psqs.set_info e pf) <|> eval_base e
| ps := eval_base ps
/--
Run `eval` on the expression and return the result together with normalization proof.
See also `eval_simple` if you want something that behaves like `norm_num`.
-/
meta def eval_with_proof (e : expr) : ring_exp_m (ex sum × expr) := do
e' ← eval e,
prod.mk e' <$> e'.proof_term
/--
Run `eval` on the expression and simplify the result.
Returns a simplified normalized expression, together with an equality proof.
See also `eval_with_proof` if you just want to check the equality of two expressions.
-/
meta def eval_simple (e : expr) : ring_exp_m (expr × expr) := do
(complicated, complicated_pf) ← eval_with_proof e,
(simple, simple_pf) ← complicated.simple,
prod.mk simple <$> lift (mk_eq_trans complicated_pf simple_pf)
/-- Compute the `eval_info` for a given type `α`. -/
meta def make_eval_info (α : expr) : tactic eval_info := do
u ← mk_meta_univ,
infer_type α >>= unify (expr.sort (level.succ u)),
u ← get_univ_assignment u,
csr_instance ← mk_app ``comm_semiring [α] >>= mk_instance,
ring_instance ← (some <$> (mk_app ``ring [α] >>= mk_instance) <|> pure none),
dr_instance ← (some <$> (mk_app ``division_ring [α] >>= mk_instance) <|> pure none),
ha_instance ← mk_app ``has_add [α] >>= mk_instance,
hm_instance ← mk_app ``has_mul [α] >>= mk_instance,
hp_instance ← mk_mapp ``monoid.has_pow [some α, none],
z ← mk_mapp ``has_zero.zero [α, none],
o ← mk_mapp ``has_one.one [α, none],
pure ⟨α, u, csr_instance, ha_instance, hm_instance, hp_instance, ring_instance, dr_instance, z, o⟩
/-- Use `e` to build the context for running `mx`. -/
meta def run_ring_exp {α} (transp : transparency) (e : expr) (mx : ring_exp_m α) : tactic α := do
info_b ← infer_type e >>= make_eval_info,
info_e ← mk_const ``nat >>= make_eval_info,
(λ x : (_ × _), x.1) <$> (state_t.run (reader_t.run mx ⟨info_b, info_e, transp⟩) [])
/-- Repeatedly apply `eval_simple` on (sub)expressions. -/
meta def normalize (transp : transparency) (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) := do
(_, e', pf') ← ext_simplify_core () {}
simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed) (λ _ _ _ _ e, do
(e'', pf) ← run_ring_exp transp e $ eval_simple e,
guard (¬ e'' =ₐ e),
return ((), e'', some pf, ff))
(λ _ _ _ _ _, failed) `eq e,
pure (e', pf')
end wiring
end tactic.ring_exp
namespace tactic.interactive
open interactive interactive.types lean.parser tactic tactic.ring_exp
local postfix `?`:9001 := optional
/--
Tactic for solving equations of *commutative* (semi)rings,
allowing variables in the exponent.
This version of `ring_exp` fails if the target is not an equality.
The variant `ring_exp_eq!` will use a more aggressive reducibility setting
to determine equality of atoms.
-/
meta def ring_exp_eq (red : parse (tk "!")?) : tactic unit := do
`(eq %%ps %%qs) ← target >>= whnf,
let transp := if red.is_some then semireducible else reducible,
((ps', ps_pf), (qs', qs_pf)) ← run_ring_exp transp ps $
prod.mk <$> eval_with_proof ps <*> eval_with_proof qs,
if ps'.eq qs'
then do
qs_pf_inv ← mk_eq_symm qs_pf,
pf ← mk_eq_trans ps_pf qs_pf_inv,
tactic.interactive.exact ``(%%pf)
else fail "ring_exp failed to prove equality"
/--
Tactic for evaluating expressions in *commutative* (semi)rings, allowing for variables in the
exponent.
This tactic extends `ring`: it should solve every goal that `ring` can solve.
Additionally, it knows how to evaluate expressions with complicated exponents
(where `ring` only understands constant exponents).
The variants `ring_exp!` and `ring_exp_eq!` use a more aggessive reducibility setting to determine
equality of atoms.
For example:
```lean
example (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) : 2^(n+1) * m = 2 * 2^n * m := by ring_exp
example (a b : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : (a + b)^(n + 2) = (a^2 + b^2 + a * b + b * a) * (a + b)^n := by ring_exp
example (x y : ℕ) : x + id y = y + id x := by ring_exp!
```
-/
meta def ring_exp (red : parse (tk "!")?) (loc : parse location) : tactic unit :=
match loc with
| interactive.loc.ns [none] := ring_exp_eq red
| _ := failed
end <|>
do ns ← loc.get_locals,
let transp := if red.is_some then semireducible else reducible,
tt ← tactic.replace_at (normalize transp) ns loc.include_goal
| fail "ring_exp failed to simplify",
when loc.include_goal $ try tactic.reflexivity
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "ring_exp",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.ring_exp],
tags := ["arithmetic", "simplification", "decision procedure"] }
end tactic.interactive
namespace conv.interactive
open conv interactive
open tactic tactic.interactive (ring_exp_eq)
open tactic.ring_exp (normalize)
local postfix `?`:9001 := optional
/--
Normalises expressions in commutative (semi-)rings inside of a `conv` block using the tactic `ring_exp`.
-/
meta def ring_exp (red : parse (lean.parser.tk "!")?) : conv unit :=
let transp := if red.is_some then semireducible else reducible in
discharge_eq_lhs (ring_exp_eq red)
<|> replace_lhs (normalize transp)
<|> fail "ring_exp failed to simplify"
end conv.interactive
|
8d96c7f7e66126b9d76cafd58be392e1676f679b | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/topology/algebra/order/extr_closure.lean | 834214a96ff6000dfb39d73f88f25ef6d6ca13d9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,298 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import topology.local_extr
import topology.algebra.order.basic
/-!
# Maximum/minimum on the closure of a set
In this file we prove several versions of the following statement: if `f : X → Y` has a (local or
not) maximum (or minimum) on a set `s` at a point `a` and is continuous on the closure of `s`, then
`f` has an extremum of the same type on `closure s` at `a`.
-/
open filter set
open_locale topological_space
variables {X Y : Type*} [topological_space X] [topological_space Y] [preorder Y]
[order_closed_topology Y] {f g : X → Y} {s : set X} {a : X}
protected lemma is_max_on.closure (h : is_max_on f s a) (hc : continuous_on f (closure s)) :
is_max_on f (closure s) a :=
λ x hx, continuous_within_at.closure_le hx ((hc x hx).mono subset_closure)
continuous_within_at_const h
protected lemma is_min_on.closure (h : is_min_on f s a) (hc : continuous_on f (closure s)) :
is_min_on f (closure s) a :=
h.dual.closure hc
protected lemma is_extr_on.closure (h : is_extr_on f s a) (hc : continuous_on f (closure s)) :
is_extr_on f (closure s) a :=
h.elim (λ h, or.inl $ h.closure hc) (λ h, or.inr $ h.closure hc)
protected lemma is_local_max_on.closure (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
(hc : continuous_on f (closure s)) :
is_local_max_on f (closure s) a :=
begin
rcases mem_nhds_within.1 h with ⟨U, Uo, aU, hU⟩,
refine mem_nhds_within.2 ⟨U, Uo, aU, _⟩,
rintro x ⟨hxU, hxs⟩,
refine continuous_within_at.closure_le _ _ continuous_within_at_const hU,
{ rwa [mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot, nhds_within_inter_of_mem,
← mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot],
exact nhds_within_le_nhds (Uo.mem_nhds hxU) },
{ exact (hc _ hxs).mono ((inter_subset_right _ _).trans subset_closure) }
end
protected lemma is_local_min_on.closure (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
(hc : continuous_on f (closure s)) :
is_local_min_on f (closure s) a :=
is_local_max_on.closure h.dual hc
protected lemma is_local_extr_on.closure (h : is_local_extr_on f s a)
(hc : continuous_on f (closure s)) :
is_local_extr_on f (closure s) a :=
h.elim (λ h, or.inl $ h.closure hc) (λ h, or.inr $ h.closure hc)
|
e217c06f4fdeb5c26f7af58ddd4bbc4bdf19a14a | e9dbaaae490bc072444e3021634bf73664003760 | /src/Problems/2015/IMO_2015_P4.lean | f87c6f9761c915ae9bc0e6f6cc0a7543f3167844 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | liaofei1128/geometry | 566d8bfe095ce0c0113d36df90635306c60e975b | 3dd128e4eec8008764bb94e18b932f9ffd66e6b3 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,996,510,399 | 1,581,454,543,000 | 1,583,337,839,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 720 | lean | import Geo.Geo.Core
namespace Geo
def IMO_2015_P4 : Prop :=
∀ (A B C : Point),
let Ω := Triangle.circumcircle ⟨A, B, C⟩;
let O := Triangle.circumcenter ⟨A, B, C⟩;
∀ (D E : Point) (Γ : Circle),
Circle.isOrigin A Γ →
intersectAt₂ Γ (Seg.mk B C) D E →
[B, D, E, C].allDistinct →
inOrderOn [B, D, E, C] (Line.mk B C) →
∀ (F G : Point),
intersectAt₂ Γ Ω F G →
inOrderOn [A, F, B, C, G] Ω →
∀ (K L : Point),
intersectAt₂ (Triangle.circumcircle ⟨B, D, F⟩) (Seg.mk A B) B K →
intersectAt₂ (Triangle.circumcircle ⟨C, G, E⟩) (Seg.mk C A) C L →
¬Line.same ⟨F, K⟩ ⟨G, L⟩ →
∀ (X : Point),
intersectAt (Line.mk F K) (Line.mk G L) X →
on X (Line.mk A O)
end Geo
|
8c940cf21a328ea404fc2eb9128d00d7f531d0c1 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/number_theory/pell.lean | b2abfcd4cc8dd63cdeba6e454c91a5b22090e053 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,278 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.nat.modeq
import Mathlib.data.zsqrtd.basic
import Mathlib.tactic.omega.default
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
namespace pell
@[simp] theorem d_pos {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : 0 < d a1 :=
nat.sub_pos_of_lt (mul_lt_mul a1 (le_of_lt a1) (of_as_true trivial) (of_as_true trivial))
def pell {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ :=
fun (n : ℕ) =>
nat.rec_on n (1, 0) fun (n : ℕ) (xy : ℕ × ℕ) => (prod.fst xy * a + d a1 * prod.snd xy, prod.fst xy + prod.snd xy * a)
def xn {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
prod.fst (pell a1 n)
def yn {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
prod.snd (pell a1 n)
@[simp] theorem pell_val {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : pell a1 n = (xn a1 n, yn a1 n) :=
(fun (this : pell a1 n = (prod.fst (pell a1 n), prod.snd (pell a1 n))) => this)
((fun (_a : ℕ × ℕ) => prod.cases_on _a fun (fst snd : ℕ) => idRhs ((fst, snd) = (fst, snd)) rfl) (pell a1 n))
@[simp] theorem xn_zero {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : xn a1 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem yn_zero {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : yn a1 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem xn_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n * a + d a1 * yn a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem yn_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : yn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n + yn a1 n * a :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem xn_one {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : xn a1 1 = a := sorry
@[simp] theorem yn_one {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : yn a1 1 = 1 := sorry
def xz {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
↑(xn a1 n)
def yz {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
↑(yn a1 n)
def az {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : ℤ :=
↑a
theorem asq_pos {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : 0 < a * a :=
le_trans (le_of_lt a1) (eq.mp (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (a * 1 ≤ a * a)) (mul_one a)) (nat.mul_le_mul_left a (le_of_lt a1)))
theorem dz_val {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : ↑(d a1) = az a1 * az a1 - 1 := sorry
@[simp] theorem xz_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : xz a1 (n + 1) = xz a1 n * az a1 + ↑(d a1) * yz a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem yz_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : yz a1 (n + 1) = xz a1 n + yz a1 n * az a1 :=
rfl
def pell_zd {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : ℤ√↑(d a1) :=
zsqrtd.mk ↑(xn a1 n) ↑(yn a1 n)
@[simp] theorem pell_zd_re {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : zsqrtd.re (pell_zd a1 n) = ↑(xn a1 n) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem pell_zd_im {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : zsqrtd.im (pell_zd a1 n) = ↑(yn a1 n) :=
rfl
def is_pell {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : ℤ√↑(d a1) → Prop :=
sorry
theorem is_pell_nat {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {x : ℕ} {y : ℕ} : is_pell a1 (zsqrtd.mk ↑x ↑y) ↔ x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1 := sorry
theorem is_pell_norm {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {b : ℤ√↑(d a1)} : is_pell a1 b ↔ b * zsqrtd.conj b = 1 := sorry
theorem is_pell_mul {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {b : ℤ√↑(d a1)} {c : ℤ√↑(d a1)} (hb : is_pell a1 b) (hc : is_pell a1 c) : is_pell a1 (b * c) := sorry
theorem is_pell_conj {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {b : ℤ√↑(d a1)} : is_pell a1 b ↔ is_pell a1 (zsqrtd.conj b) := sorry
@[simp] theorem pell_zd_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : pell_zd a1 (n + 1) = pell_zd a1 n * zsqrtd.mk (↑a) 1 := sorry
theorem is_pell_one {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : is_pell a1 (zsqrtd.mk (↑a) 1) := sorry
theorem is_pell_pell_zd {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : is_pell a1 (pell_zd a1 n) := sorry
@[simp] theorem pell_eqz {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : xz a1 n * xz a1 n - ↑(d a1) * yz a1 n * yz a1 n = 1 :=
is_pell_pell_zd a1 n
@[simp] theorem pell_eq {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : xn a1 n * xn a1 n - d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n = 1 := sorry
protected instance dnsq {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) : zsqrtd.nonsquare (d a1) := sorry
theorem xn_ge_a_pow {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n ≤ xn a1 n := sorry
theorem n_lt_a_pow {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : n < a ^ n := sorry
theorem n_lt_xn {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : n < xn a1 n :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (n_lt_a_pow a1 n) (xn_ge_a_pow a1 n)
theorem x_pos {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : 0 < xn a1 n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le n) (n_lt_xn a1 n)
theorem eq_pell_lem {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) (b : ℤ√↑(d a1)) : 1 ≤ b → is_pell a1 b → b ≤ pell_zd a1 n → ∃ (n : ℕ), b = pell_zd a1 n := sorry
theorem eq_pell_zd {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (b : ℤ√↑(d a1)) (b1 : 1 ≤ b) (hp : is_pell a1 b) : ∃ (n : ℕ), b = pell_zd a1 n := sorry
theorem eq_pell {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {x : ℕ} {y : ℕ} (hp : x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1) : ∃ (n : ℕ), x = xn a1 n ∧ y = yn a1 n := sorry
theorem pell_zd_add {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : pell_zd a1 (m + n) = pell_zd a1 m * pell_zd a1 n := sorry
theorem xn_add {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (m + n) = xn a1 m * xn a1 n + d a1 * yn a1 m * yn a1 n := sorry
theorem yn_add {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : yn a1 (m + n) = xn a1 m * yn a1 n + yn a1 m * xn a1 n := sorry
theorem pell_zd_sub {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : pell_zd a1 (m - n) = pell_zd a1 m * zsqrtd.conj (pell_zd a1 n) := sorry
theorem xz_sub {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : xz a1 (m - n) = xz a1 m * xz a1 n - ↑(d a1) * yz a1 m * yz a1 n := sorry
theorem yz_sub {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : yz a1 (m - n) = xz a1 n * yz a1 m - xz a1 m * yz a1 n := sorry
theorem xy_coprime {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : nat.coprime (xn a1 n) (yn a1 n) := sorry
theorem y_increasing {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ} : m < n → yn a1 m < yn a1 n := sorry
theorem x_increasing {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ} : m < n → xn a1 m < xn a1 n := sorry
theorem yn_ge_n {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : n ≤ yn a1 n := sorry
theorem y_mul_dvd {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) : yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 (n * k) := sorry
theorem y_dvd_iff {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : yn a1 m ∣ yn a1 n ↔ m ∣ n := sorry
theorem xy_modeq_yn {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) : nat.modeq (yn a1 n ^ bit0 1) (xn a1 (n * k)) (xn a1 n ^ k) ∧
nat.modeq (yn a1 n ^ bit1 1) (yn a1 (n * k)) (k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) * yn a1 n) := sorry
theorem ysq_dvd_yy {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : yn a1 n * yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 (n * yn a1 n) := sorry
theorem dvd_of_ysq_dvd {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {n : ℕ} {t : ℕ} (h : yn a1 n * yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 t) : yn a1 n ∣ t := sorry
theorem pell_zd_succ_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : pell_zd a1 (n + bit0 1) + pell_zd a1 n = ↑(bit0 1 * a) * pell_zd a1 (n + 1) := sorry
theorem xy_succ_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (n + bit0 1) + xn a1 n = bit0 1 * a * xn a1 (n + 1) ∧ yn a1 (n + bit0 1) + yn a1 n = bit0 1 * a * yn a1 (n + 1) := sorry
theorem xn_succ_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (n + bit0 1) + xn a1 n = bit0 1 * a * xn a1 (n + 1) :=
and.left (xy_succ_succ a1 n)
theorem yn_succ_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : yn a1 (n + bit0 1) + yn a1 n = bit0 1 * a * yn a1 (n + 1) :=
and.right (xy_succ_succ a1 n)
theorem xz_succ_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : xz a1 (n + bit0 1) = ↑(bit0 1 * a) * xz a1 (n + 1) - xz a1 n := sorry
theorem yz_succ_succ {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : yz a1 (n + bit0 1) = ↑(bit0 1 * a) * yz a1 (n + 1) - yz a1 n := sorry
theorem yn_modeq_a_sub_one {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : nat.modeq (a - 1) (yn a1 n) n := sorry
theorem yn_modeq_two {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : nat.modeq (bit0 1) (yn a1 n) n := sorry
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (y2 : ℤ) (y1 : ℤ) (y0 : ℤ) (yn1 : ℤ) (yn0 : ℤ) (xn1 : ℤ) (xn0 : ℤ) (ay : ℤ) (a2 : ℤ) : (a2 * yn1 - yn0) * ay + y2 - (a2 * xn1 - xn0) = y2 - a2 * y1 + y0 + a2 * (yn1 * ay + y1 - xn1) - (yn0 * ay + y0 - xn0) := sorry
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (y : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : bit0 1 * ↑a * ↑y - ↑y * ↑y - 1 ∣ yz a1 n * (↑a - ↑y) + ↑(y ^ n) - xz a1 n := sorry
theorem xn_modeq_x2n_add_lem {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) (j : ℕ) : xn a1 n ∣ d a1 * yn a1 n * (yn a1 n * xn a1 j) + xn a1 j := sorry
theorem xn_modeq_x2n_add {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) (j : ℕ) : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (bit0 1 * n + j) + xn a1 j) 0 := sorry
theorem xn_modeq_x2n_sub_lem {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {n : ℕ} {j : ℕ} (h : j ≤ n) : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (bit0 1 * n - j) + xn a1 j) 0 := sorry
theorem xn_modeq_x2n_sub {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {n : ℕ} {j : ℕ} (h : j ≤ bit0 1 * n) : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (bit0 1 * n - j) + xn a1 j) 0 := sorry
theorem xn_modeq_x4n_add {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) (j : ℕ) : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (bit0 (bit0 1) * n + j)) (xn a1 j) := sorry
theorem xn_modeq_x4n_sub {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {n : ℕ} {j : ℕ} (h : j ≤ bit0 1 * n) : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (bit0 (bit0 1) * n - j)) (xn a1 j) := sorry
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq_lem1 {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {i : ℕ} {n : ℕ} {j : ℕ} : i < j → j < n → xn a1 i % xn a1 n < xn a1 j % xn a1 n := sorry
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq_lem2 {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {n : ℕ} (h : bit0 1 * xn a1 n = xn a1 (n + 1)) : a = bit0 1 ∧ n = 0 := sorry
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq_lem3 {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {i : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (npos : 0 < n) {j : ℕ} : i < j → j ≤ bit0 1 * n → j ≠ n → ¬(a = bit0 1 ∧ n = 1 ∧ i = 0 ∧ j = bit0 1) → xn a1 i % xn a1 n < xn a1 j % xn a1 n := sorry
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq_le {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {i : ℕ} {j : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (npos : 0 < n) (ij : i ≤ j) (j2n : j ≤ bit0 1 * n) (h : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 i) (xn a1 j)) (ntriv : ¬(a = bit0 1 ∧ n = 1 ∧ i = 0 ∧ j = bit0 1)) : i = j := sorry
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {i : ℕ} {j : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (npos : 0 < n) (i2n : i ≤ bit0 1 * n) (j2n : j ≤ bit0 1 * n) (h : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 i) (xn a1 j)) (ntriv : a = bit0 1 → n = 1 → (i = 0 → j ≠ bit0 1) ∧ (i = bit0 1 → j ≠ 0)) : i = j := sorry
theorem eq_of_xn_modeq' {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {i : ℕ} {j : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (ipos : 0 < i) (hin : i ≤ n) (j4n : j ≤ bit0 (bit0 1) * n) (h : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 j) (xn a1 i)) : j = i ∨ j + i = bit0 (bit0 1) * n := sorry
theorem modeq_of_xn_modeq {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) {i : ℕ} {j : ℕ} {n : ℕ} (ipos : 0 < i) (hin : i ≤ n) (h : nat.modeq (xn a1 n) (xn a1 j) (xn a1 i)) : nat.modeq (bit0 (bit0 1) * n) j i ∨ nat.modeq (bit0 (bit0 1) * n) (j + i) 0 := sorry
theorem xy_modeq_of_modeq {a : ℕ} {b : ℕ} {c : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (b1 : 1 < b) (h : nat.modeq c a b) (n : ℕ) : nat.modeq c (xn a1 n) (xn b1 n) ∧ nat.modeq c (yn a1 n) (yn b1 n) := sorry
theorem matiyasevic {a : ℕ} {k : ℕ} {x : ℕ} {y : ℕ} : (∃ (a1 : 1 < a), xn a1 k = x ∧ yn a1 k = y) ↔
1 < a ∧
k ≤ y ∧
(x = 1 ∧ y = 0 ∨
∃ (u : ℕ),
∃ (v : ℕ),
∃ (s : ℕ),
∃ (t : ℕ),
∃ (b : ℕ),
x * x - (a * a - 1) * y * y = 1 ∧
u * u - (a * a - 1) * v * v = 1 ∧
s * s - (b * b - 1) * t * t = 1 ∧
1 < b ∧
nat.modeq (bit0 (bit0 1) * y) b 1 ∧
nat.modeq u b a ∧ 0 < v ∧ y * y ∣ v ∧ nat.modeq u s x ∧ nat.modeq (bit0 (bit0 1) * y) t k) := sorry
theorem eq_pow_of_pell_lem {a : ℕ} {y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a) (ypos : 0 < y) : 0 < k → y ^ k < a → ↑(y ^ k) < bit0 1 * ↑a * ↑y - ↑y * ↑y - 1 := sorry
theorem eq_pow_of_pell {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ} {k : ℕ} : n ^ k = m ↔
k = 0 ∧ m = 1 ∨
0 < k ∧
(n = 0 ∧ m = 0 ∨
0 < n ∧
∃ (w : ℕ),
∃ (a : ℕ),
∃ (t : ℕ),
∃ (z : ℕ),
∃ (a1 : 1 < a),
nat.modeq t (xn a1 k) (yn a1 k * (a - n) + m) ∧
bit0 1 * a * n = t + (n * n + 1) ∧
m < t ∧ n ≤ w ∧ k ≤ w ∧ a * a - ((w + 1) * (w + 1) - 1) * (w * z) * (w * z) = 1) := sorry
|
60c0070baa7d28ffccb8a89a67837707acc71255 | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /library/init/tactic.lean | 3aaeb60ee8ed22617e44a985684f9f8bafbb6677 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,045 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
This is just a trick to embed the 'tactic language' as a Lean
expression. We should view 'tactic' as automation that when execute
produces a term. tactic.builtin is just a "dummy" for creating the
definitions that are actually implemented in C++
-/
prelude
import init.datatypes init.reserved_notation init.num
inductive tactic :
Type := builtin : tactic
namespace tactic
-- Remark the following names are not arbitrary, the tactic module
-- uses them when converting Lean expressions into actual tactic objects.
-- The bultin 'by' construct triggers the process of converting a
-- a term of type 'tactic' into a tactic that sythesizes a term
definition and_then (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition or_else (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition append (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition interleave (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition par (t1 t2 : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition fixpoint (f : tactic → tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition repeat (t : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition at_most (t : tactic) (k : num) : tactic := builtin
definition discard (t : tactic) (k : num) : tactic := builtin
definition focus_at (t : tactic) (i : num) : tactic := builtin
definition try_for (t : tactic) (ms : num) : tactic := builtin
definition all_goals (t : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition now : tactic := builtin
definition assumption : tactic := builtin
definition eassumption : tactic := builtin
definition state : tactic := builtin
definition fail : tactic := builtin
definition id : tactic := builtin
definition beta : tactic := builtin
definition info : tactic := builtin
definition whnf : tactic := builtin
definition contradiction : tactic := builtin
definition exfalso : tactic := builtin
definition congruence : tactic := builtin
definition rotate_left (k : num) := builtin
definition rotate_right (k : num) := builtin
definition rotate (k : num) := rotate_left k
definition norm_num : tactic := builtin
-- This is just a trick to embed expressions into tactics.
-- The nested expressions are "raw". They tactic should
-- elaborate them when it is executed.
inductive expr : Type :=
builtin : expr
inductive expr_list : Type :=
| nil : expr_list
| cons : expr → expr_list → expr_list
-- auxiliary type used to mark optional list of arguments
definition opt_expr_list := expr_list
-- auxiliary types used to mark that the expression is suppose to be an identifier, optional, or a list.
definition identifier := expr
definition identifier_list := expr_list
definition opt_identifier_list := expr_list
-- Remark: the parser has special support for tactics containing `location` parameters.
-- It will parse the optional `at ...` modifier.
definition location := expr
-- Marker for instructing the parser to parse it as 'with <expr>'
definition with_expr := expr
-- Marker for instructing the parser to parse it as '?(using <expr>)'
definition using_expr := expr
-- Constant used to denote the case were no expression was provided
definition none_expr : expr := expr.builtin
definition apply (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition eapply (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition fapply (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition rename (a b : identifier) : tactic := builtin
definition intro (e : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition generalize_tac (e : expr) (id : identifier) : tactic := builtin
definition clear (e : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition revert (e : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition refine (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition exact (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
-- Relaxed version of exact that does not enforce goal type
definition rexact (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition check_expr (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition trace (s : string) : tactic := builtin
-- rewrite_tac is just a marker for the builtin 'rewrite' notation
-- used to create instances of this tactic.
definition rewrite_tac (e : expr_list) : tactic := builtin
definition xrewrite_tac (e : expr_list) : tactic := builtin
definition krewrite_tac (e : expr_list) : tactic := builtin
definition replace (old : expr) (new : with_expr) (loc : location) : tactic := builtin
-- Arguments:
-- - ls : lemmas to be used (if not provided, then blast will choose them)
-- - ds : definitions that can be unfolded (if not provided, then blast will choose them)
definition blast (ls : opt_identifier_list) (ds : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
-- with_options_tac is just a marker for the builtin 'with_options' notation
definition with_options_tac (o : expr) (t : tactic) : tactic := builtin
-- with_options_tac is just a marker for the builtin 'with_attributes' notation
definition with_attributes_tac (o : expr) (n : identifier_list) (t : tactic) : tactic := builtin
definition simp : tactic := #tactic with_options [blast.strategy "simp"] blast
definition simp_nohyps : tactic := #tactic with_options [blast.strategy "simp_nohyps"] blast
definition simp_topdown : tactic := #tactic with_options [blast.strategy "simp", simplify.top_down true] blast
definition inst_simp : tactic := #tactic with_options [blast.strategy "ematch_simp"] blast
definition rec_simp : tactic := #tactic with_options [blast.strategy "rec_simp"] blast
definition rec_inst_simp : tactic := #tactic with_options [blast.strategy "rec_ematch_simp"] blast
definition grind : tactic := #tactic with_options [blast.strategy "grind"] blast
definition grind_simp : tactic := #tactic with_options [blast.strategy "grind_simp"] blast
definition cases (h : expr) (ids : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition induction (h : expr) (rec : using_expr) (ids : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition intros (ids : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition generalizes (es : expr_list) : tactic := builtin
definition clears (ids : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition reverts (ids : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition change (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition assert_hypothesis (id : identifier) (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition note_tac (id : identifier) (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition constructor (k : option num) : tactic := builtin
definition fconstructor (k : option num) : tactic := builtin
definition existsi (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition split : tactic := builtin
definition left : tactic := builtin
definition right : tactic := builtin
definition injection (e : expr) (ids : opt_identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition subst (ids : identifier_list) : tactic := builtin
definition substvars : tactic := builtin
definition reflexivity : tactic := builtin
definition symmetry : tactic := builtin
definition transitivity (e : expr) : tactic := builtin
definition try (t : tactic) : tactic := or_else t id
definition repeat1 (t : tactic) : tactic := and_then t (repeat t)
definition focus (t : tactic) : tactic := focus_at t 0
definition determ (t : tactic) : tactic := at_most t 1
definition trivial : tactic := or_else (or_else (apply eq.refl) (apply true.intro)) assumption
definition do (n : num) (t : tactic) : tactic :=
nat.rec id (λn t', and_then t t') (nat.of_num n)
end tactic
tactic_infixl `;`:15 := tactic.and_then
tactic_notation T1 `:`:15 T2 := tactic.focus (tactic.and_then T1 (tactic.all_goals T2))
tactic_notation `(` h `|` r:(foldl `|` (e r, tactic.or_else r e) h) `)` := r
--tactic_notation `replace` s `with` t := tactic.replace_tac s t
|
2f32fd6aa6a08bd9ee168d92b8dd3aaf443e4061 | 159fed64bfae88f3b6a6166836d6278f953bcbf9 | /Structure/Generic/Notation.lean | 22b21ae0e1920dc59679103e08e7acd4e039b02f | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | SReichelt/lean4-experiments | 3e56830c8b2fbe3814eda071c48e3c8810d254a8 | ff55357a01a34a91bf670d712637480089085ee4 | refs/heads/main | 1,683,977,454,907 | 1,622,991,121,000 | 1,622,991,121,000 | 340,765,677 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 550 | lean | -- Some type classes for special notation that we use.
import mathlib4_experiments.Data.Notation
set_option autoBoundImplicitLocal false
universes u v w
class HasProduct (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) where
{γ : Sort w}
(Product : α → β → γ)
infixr:35 " (⧆) " => HasProduct.γ
infixr:35 " ⧆ " => HasProduct.Product
class HasArrow (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) where
{γ : Sort w}
(Arrow : α → β → γ)
infixr:20 " (⇝) " => HasArrow.γ
infixr:20 " ⇝ " => HasArrow.Arrow
infixr:25 " (≃) " => HasEquivalence.γ
|
7dfe1762225c2458816901e2fd61deef47de0b4e | 5df84495ec6c281df6d26411cc20aac5c941e745 | /src/formal_ml/nat.lean | 3f713070fa2f968fb821f725a52da8ba089e7824 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/formal-ml | e278df5a8df78aa3947bc8376650419e1b2b0a14 | 630011d19fdd9539c8d6493a69fe70af5d193590 | refs/heads/master | 1,681,491,589,256 | 1,612,642,743,000 | 1,612,642,743,000 | 360,114,136 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,998,189,000 | 1,618,998,188,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,310 | lean | /-
Copyright 2020 Google LLC
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-/
import algebra.ordered_ring
import data.nat.basic
import formal_ml.core
/-
In order to understand all of the results about natural numbers,
it is helpful to look at the instances for nat that are defined.
Specifically, the naturals are:
1. a canonically ordered commutative semiring
2. a decidable linear ordered semiring.
-/
lemma lt_antirefl (n:ℕ):(n < n)→ false :=
begin
apply nat.lt_irrefl,
end
--While this does solve the problem, it is not identical.
lemma lt_succ (n:ℕ):(n < nat.succ n) :=
begin
apply nat.le_refl,
end
lemma lt_succ_of_lt (m n:ℕ):(m < n) → (m < nat.succ n) :=
begin
intros a,
apply nat.lt_succ_of_le,
apply ((@nat.lt_iff_le_not_le m n).mp a).left,
end
lemma nat_lt_def (n m:ℕ): n < m ↔ (nat.succ n) ≤ m :=
begin
refl,
end
lemma lt_succ_imp_le (a b:ℕ):a < nat.succ b → a ≤ b :=
begin
intros a_1,
rw nat_lt_def at a_1,
apply nat.le_of_succ_le_succ,
assumption,
end
lemma nat_fact_pos {n:ℕ}:0 < nat.factorial n :=
begin
induction n,
{
simp,
},
{
simp,
apply n_ih,
}
end
lemma nat_minus_cancel_of_le {k n:ℕ}:k≤ n → (n - k) + k = n :=
begin
rw add_comm,
apply nat.add_sub_cancel',
end
lemma nat_lt_of_add_lt {a b c:ℕ}:a + b < c → b < c :=
begin
induction a,
{
simp,
},
{
rw nat.succ_add,
intro A1,
apply a_ih,
apply nat.lt_of_succ_lt,
apply A1,
}
end
lemma nat_fact_nonzero {n:ℕ}:nat.factorial n ≠ 0 :=
begin
intro A1,
have A2:0 < nat.factorial n := nat_fact_pos,
rw A1 at A2,
apply lt_irrefl 0 A2,
end
lemma nat_lt_sub_of_add_lt {k n n':ℕ}:n + k < n' → n < n' - k :=
begin
revert n',
revert n,
induction k,
{
intros n n' A1,
rw add_zero at A1,
simp,
apply A1,
},
{
intros n n' A1,
cases n',
{
exfalso,
apply nat.not_lt_zero,
apply A1,
},
{
rw nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
apply k_ih,
rw nat.add_succ at A1,
apply nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ,
apply A1,
}
}
end
lemma nat_zero_lt_of_nonzero {n:ℕ}:(n≠ 0)→ (0 < n) :=
begin
intro A1,
cases n,
{
exfalso,
apply A1,
refl,
},
{
apply nat.zero_lt_succ,
}
end
--In an earlier version, this was solvable via simp.
lemma nat_succ_one_add {n:ℕ}:nat.succ n = 1 + n :=
begin
rw add_comm,
end
lemma nat.le_add {a b:ℕ}:a ≤ a + b :=
begin
simp,
end
-- mul_left_cancel' is the inspiration here.
-- However, it doesn't exist for nat.
lemma nat.mul_left_cancel_trichotomy {x : ℕ}:x ≠ 0 → ∀ {y z : ℕ},
(x * y = x * z ↔ y = z)
∧ (x * y < x * z ↔ y < z) :=
begin
induction x,
{
intros A1 y z,
exfalso,
apply A1,
refl,
},
{
intros A1 y z,
rw nat_succ_one_add,
rw right_distrib,
rw one_mul,
rw right_distrib,
rw one_mul,
cases x_n,
{
rw zero_mul,
rw zero_mul,
rw add_zero,
rw add_zero,
simp,
},
{
have B1:nat.succ x_n ≠ 0,
{
have A2A:0 < nat.succ x_n,
{
apply nat.zero_lt_succ,
},
intro A2B,
rw A2B at A2A,
apply lt_irrefl 0 A2A,
},
have A2 := @x_ih B1 y z,
have B2 := @x_ih B1 z y,
cases A2 with A3 A4,
cases B2 with B3 B4,
have A5:y < z ∨ y = z ∨ z < y := lt_trichotomy y z,
split;split;intros A6,
{
cases A5,
{
exfalso,
have A7:y + nat.succ x_n * y < z + nat.succ x_n * z,
{
apply add_lt_add A5 (A4.mpr A5),
},
rw A6 at A7,
apply lt_irrefl _ A7,
},
cases A5,
{
exact A5,
},
{
exfalso,
have A7:z + nat.succ x_n * z < y + nat.succ x_n * y,
{
apply add_lt_add A5 (B4.mpr A5),
},
rw A6 at A7,
apply lt_irrefl _ A7,
},
},
{
rw A6,
},
{
cases A5,
{
apply A5,
},
cases A5,
{
rw A5 at A6,
exfalso,
apply lt_irrefl _ A6,
},
{
exfalso,
apply not_lt_of_lt A6,
apply add_lt_add A5 (B4.mpr A5),
},
},
{
apply add_lt_add A6,
apply A4.mpr A6,
}
}
}
end
lemma nat.mul_left_cancel' {x : ℕ}:x ≠ 0 → ∀ {y z : ℕ},
(x * y = x * z → y = z) :=
begin
intros A1 y z A2,
apply (@nat.mul_left_cancel_trichotomy x A1 y z).left.mp A2,
end
lemma nat.mul_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_zero {a b:ℕ}:
a * b = 0 ↔ (a = 0 ∨ b = 0) :=
begin
split;intros A1,
{
have A2:(a=0) ∨ (a ≠ (0:ℕ)) := eq_or_ne,
cases A2,
{
left,
apply A2,
},
{
have A1:a * b = a * 0,
{
rw mul_zero,
apply A1,
},
right,
apply nat.mul_left_cancel' A2 A1,
}
},
{
cases A1;rw A1,
{
rw zero_mul,
},
{
rw mul_zero,
}
}
end
lemma double_ne {m n:ℕ}:2 * m ≠ 1 + 2 * n :=
begin
intro A1,
have A2:=lt_trichotomy m n,
cases A2,
{
have A3:0 + 2 * m < 1 + 2 * n,
{
apply add_lt_add,
apply zero_lt_one,
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left A2 zero_lt_two,
},
rw zero_add at A3,
rw A1 at A3,
apply lt_irrefl _ A3,
},
cases A2,
{
rw A2 at A1,
have A3:0 + 2 * n < 1 + 2 * n,
{
rw add_comm 0 _,
rw add_comm 1 _,
apply add_lt_add_left,
apply zero_lt_one,
},
rw zero_add at A3,
rw ← A1 at A3,
apply lt_irrefl _ A3,
},
{
have A4:nat.succ n ≤ m,
{
apply nat.succ_le_of_lt A2,
},
have A5 := lt_or_eq_of_le A4,
cases A5,
{
have A6:2 * nat.succ n < 2 * m,
{
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left A5 zero_lt_two,
},
rw nat_succ_one_add at A6,
rw left_distrib at A6,
rw mul_one at A6,
have A7:1 + 2 * n < 2 * m,
{
apply lt_trans _ A6,
apply add_lt_add_right,
apply one_lt_two,
},
rw A1 at A7,
apply lt_irrefl _ A7,
},
{
subst m,
rw nat_succ_one_add at A1,
rw left_distrib at A1,
rw mul_one at A1,
simp at A1,
have A2:1 < 2 := one_lt_two,
rw A1 at A2,
apply lt_irrefl _ A2,
}
},
end
lemma nat.one_le_of_zero_lt {x:ℕ}:0 < x → 1 ≤ x :=
begin
intro A1,
apply nat.succ_le_of_lt,
apply A1,
end
lemma nat.succ_le_iff_lt {m n:ℕ}:m.succ ≤ n ↔ m < n :=
begin
apply nat.succ_le_iff,
end
lemma nat.zero_of_lt_one {x:ℕ}:x < 1 → x = 0 :=
begin
intro A1,
have B1 := nat.le_pred_of_lt A1,
simp at B1,
apply B1,
end
-------------------------------------- Move these to some pow.lean file, or into mathlib ---------------
lemma linear_ordered_semiring.one_le_pow {α:Type*} [linear_ordered_semiring α]
{a:α} {b:ℕ}:1 ≤ a → 1≤ a^b :=
begin
induction b,
{
simp,
intro A1,
apply le_refl _,
},
{
rw pow_succ,
intro A1,
have A2 := b_ih A1,
have A3:1 * a^b_n ≤ a * (a^b_n),
{
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right,
apply A1,
apply le_of_lt,
apply lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one A2,
},
apply le_trans _ A3,
simp [A2],
},
end
lemma linear_ordered_semiring.pow_monotone
{α:Type*} [linear_ordered_semiring α] [N:nontrivial α] {a:α} {b c:ℕ}:1 ≤ a → b ≤ c → a^b ≤ a^c :=
begin
intros A1 A2,
rw le_iff_exists_add at A2,
cases A2 with d A2,
rw A2,
rw pow_add,
rw le_mul_iff_one_le_right,
apply linear_ordered_semiring.one_le_pow A1,
apply lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one,
apply linear_ordered_semiring.one_le_pow A1,
apply N
end
|
21afd709b874a1e7c3dc59ac2c58e8de43f7babd | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/data/list/big_operators/basic.lean | ac866d2ce39f330b9563b1e6069a37efbec897c6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,342 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel, Alex J. Best
-/
import data.list.forall2
/-!
# Sums and products from lists
This file provides basic results about `list.prod`, `list.sum`, which calculate the product and sum
of elements of a list and `list.alternating_prod`, `list.alternating_sum`, their alternating
counterparts. These are defined in [`data.list.defs`](./defs).
-/
variables {ι α M N P M₀ G R : Type*}
namespace list
section monoid
variables [monoid M] [monoid N] [monoid P] {l l₁ l₂ : list M} {a : M}
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_nil : ([] : list M).prod = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_singleton : [a].prod = a := one_mul a
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_cons : (a :: l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a :: l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_concat : (l.concat a).prod = l.prod * a :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, prod_append, prod_singleton]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_join {l : list (list M)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_eq_foldr : l.prod = foldr (*) 1 l :=
list.rec_on l rfl $ λ a l ihl, by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, ihl]
@[simp, priority 500, to_additive]
theorem prod_repeat (a : M) (n : ℕ) : (repeat a n).prod = a ^ n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ rw pow_zero, refl },
{ rw [list.repeat_succ, list.prod_cons, ih, pow_succ] }
end
@[to_additive sum_eq_card_nsmul]
lemma prod_eq_pow_card (l : list M) (m : M) (h : ∀ (x ∈ l), x = m) :
l.prod = m ^ l.length :=
by rw [← prod_repeat, ← list.eq_repeat.mpr ⟨rfl, h⟩]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_hom_rel (l : list ι) {r : M → N → Prop} {f : ι → M} {g : ι → N} (h₁ : r 1 1)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃i a b⦄, r a b → r (f i * a) (g i * b)) :
r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ a l hl, by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl])
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_hom (l : list M) {F : Type*} [monoid_hom_class F M N] (f : F) :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod :=
by { simp only [prod, foldl_map, ← map_one f],
exact l.foldl_hom _ _ _ 1 (map_mul f) }
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_hom₂ (l : list ι) (f : M → N → P)
(hf : ∀ a b c d, f (a * b) (c * d) = f a c * f b d) (hf' : f 1 1 = 1) (f₁ : ι → M) (f₂ : ι → N) :
(l.map $ λ i, f (f₁ i) (f₂ i)).prod = f (l.map f₁).prod (l.map f₂).prod :=
begin
simp only [prod, foldl_map],
convert l.foldl_hom₂ (λ a b, f a b) _ _ _ _ _ (λ a b i, _),
{ exact hf'.symm },
{ exact hf _ _ _ _ }
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_map_mul {α : Type*} [comm_monoid α] {l : list ι} {f g : ι → α} :
(l.map $ λ i, f i * g i).prod = (l.map f).prod * (l.map g).prod :=
l.prod_hom₂ (*) mul_mul_mul_comm (mul_one _) _ _
@[simp]
lemma prod_map_neg {α} [comm_monoid α] [has_distrib_neg α] (l : list α) :
(l.map has_neg.neg).prod = (-1) ^ l.length * l.prod :=
begin
convert @prod_map_mul α α _ l (λ _, -1) id,
{ ext, rw neg_one_mul, refl },
{ convert (prod_repeat _ _).symm, rw eq_repeat,
use l.length_map _, intro, rw mem_map, rintro ⟨_, _, rfl⟩, refl },
{ rw l.map_id },
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_hom (L : list ι) (f : ι → M) {G : Type*} [monoid_hom_class G M N] (g : G) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g ((L.map f).prod) :=
by rw [← prod_hom, map_map]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_is_unit : Π {L : list M} (u : ∀ m ∈ L, is_unit m), is_unit L.prod
| [] _ := by simp
| (h :: t) u :=
begin
simp only [list.prod_cons],
exact is_unit.mul (u h (mem_cons_self h t)) (prod_is_unit (λ m mt, u m (mem_cons_of_mem h mt)))
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_is_unit_iff {α : Type*} [comm_monoid α] {L : list α} :
is_unit L.prod ↔ ∀ m ∈ L, is_unit m :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, prod_is_unit⟩,
induction L with m L ih,
{ exact λ m' h', false.elim (not_mem_nil m' h'), },
rw [prod_cons, is_unit.mul_iff] at h,
exact λ m' h', or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h') (λ H, H.substr h.1) (λ H, ih h.2 _ H),
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_take_mul_prod_drop :
∀ (L : list M) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [] i := by simp [nat.zero_le]
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop] }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : list M) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ, mul_assoc] }
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
@[to_additive "A list with sum not zero must have positive length."]
lemma length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : list M) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { contrapose h, simp }, { simp } }
/-- A list with product greater than one must have positive length. -/
@[to_additive length_pos_of_sum_pos "A list with positive sum must have positive length."]
lemma length_pos_of_one_lt_prod [preorder M] (L : list M) (h : 1 < L.prod) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_prod_ne_one L h.ne'
/-- A list with product less than one must have positive length. -/
@[to_additive "A list with negative sum must have positive length."]
lemma length_pos_of_prod_lt_one [preorder M] (L : list M) (h : L.prod < 1) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_prod_ne_one L h.ne
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_update_nth : ∀ (L : list M) (n : ℕ) (a : M),
(L.update_nth n a).prod =
(L.take n).prod * (if n < L.length then a else 1) * (L.drop (n + 1)).prod
| (x :: xs) 0 a := by simp [update_nth]
| (x :: xs) (i+1) a := by simp [update_nth, prod_update_nth xs i a, mul_assoc]
| [] _ _ := by simp [update_nth, (nat.zero_le _).not_lt, nat.zero_le]
open mul_opposite
/-- We'd like to state this as `L.head * L.tail.prod = L.prod`, but because `L.head` relies on an
inhabited instance to return a garbage value on the empty list, this is not possible.
Instead, we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1`.
-/
@[to_additive "We'd like to state this as `L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum`, but because `L.head`
relies on an inhabited instance to return a garbage value on the empty list, this is not possible.
Instead, we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 0`."]
lemma nth_zero_mul_tail_prod (l : list M) : (l.nth 0).get_or_else 1 * l.tail.prod = l.prod :=
by cases l; simp
/-- Same as `nth_zero_mul_tail_prod`, but avoiding the `list.head` garbage complication by requiring
the list to be nonempty. -/
@[to_additive "Same as `nth_zero_add_tail_sum`, but avoiding the `list.head` garbage complication
by requiring the list to be nonempty."]
lemma head_mul_tail_prod_of_ne_nil [inhabited M] (l : list M) (h : l ≠ []) :
l.head * l.tail.prod = l.prod :=
by cases l; [contradiction, simp]
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.commute.list_prod_right (l : list M) (y : M) (h : ∀ (x ∈ l), commute y x) :
commute y l.prod :=
begin
induction l with z l IH,
{ simp },
{ rw list.ball_cons at h,
rw list.prod_cons,
exact commute.mul_right h.1 (IH h.2), }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.commute.list_prod_left (l : list M) (y : M) (h : ∀ (x ∈ l), commute x y) :
commute l.prod y :=
(commute.list_prod_right _ _ $ λ x hx, (h _ hx).symm).symm
@[to_additive sum_le_sum] lemma forall₂.prod_le_prod' [preorder M]
[covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)]
{l₁ l₂ : list M} (h : forall₂ (≤) l₁ l₂) : l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod :=
begin
induction h with a b la lb hab ih ih',
{ refl },
{ simpa only [prod_cons] using mul_le_mul' hab ih' }
end
/-- If `l₁` is a sublist of `l₂` and all elements of `l₂` are greater than or equal to one, then
`l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod`. One can prove a stronger version assuming `∀ a ∈ l₂.diff l₁, 1 ≤ a` instead
of `∀ a ∈ l₂, 1 ≤ a` but this lemma is not yet in `mathlib`. -/
@[to_additive sum_le_sum "If `l₁` is a sublist of `l₂` and all elements of `l₂` are nonnegative,
then `l₁.sum ≤ l₂.sum`. One can prove a stronger version assuming `∀ a ∈ l₂.diff l₁, 0 ≤ a` instead
of `∀ a ∈ l₂, 0 ≤ a` but this lemma is not yet in `mathlib`."]
lemma sublist.prod_le_prod' [preorder M] [covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)]
[covariant_class M M (*) (≤)] {l₁ l₂ : list M} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, (1 : M) ≤ a) :
l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod :=
begin
induction h, { refl },
case cons : l₁ l₂ a ih ih'
{ simp only [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at h₁ ⊢,
exact (ih' h₁.2).trans (le_mul_of_one_le_left' h₁.1) },
case cons2 : l₁ l₂ a ih ih'
{ simp only [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at h₁ ⊢,
exact mul_le_mul_left' (ih' h₁.2) _ }
end
@[to_additive sum_le_sum] lemma sublist_forall₂.prod_le_prod' [preorder M]
[covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)]
{l₁ l₂ : list M} (h : sublist_forall₂ (≤) l₁ l₂) (h₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, (1 : M) ≤ a) :
l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod :=
let ⟨l, hall, hsub⟩ := sublist_forall₂_iff.1 h
in hall.prod_le_prod'.trans $ hsub.prod_le_prod' h₁
@[to_additive sum_le_sum] lemma prod_le_prod' [preorder M]
[covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)]
{l : list ι} {f g : ι → M} (h : ∀ i ∈ l, f i ≤ g i) :
(l.map f).prod ≤ (l.map g).prod :=
forall₂.prod_le_prod' $ by simpa
@[to_additive sum_lt_sum] lemma prod_lt_prod'
[preorder M] [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)]
[covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (<)] [covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)]
{l : list ι} (f g : ι → M) (h₁ : ∀ i ∈ l, f i ≤ g i) (h₂ : ∃ i ∈ l, f i < g i) :
(l.map f).prod < (l.map g).prod :=
begin
induction l with i l ihl, { rcases h₂ with ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩ },
simp only [ball_cons, bex_cons, map_cons, prod_cons] at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
cases h₂,
exacts [mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le h₂ (prod_le_prod' h₁.2),
mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt h₁.1 $ ihl h₁.2 h₂]
end
@[to_additive] lemma prod_lt_prod_of_ne_nil
[preorder M] [covariant_class M M (*) (<)] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)]
[covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (<)] [covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)]
{l : list ι} (hl : l ≠ []) (f g : ι → M) (hlt : ∀ i ∈ l, f i < g i) :
(l.map f).prod < (l.map g).prod :=
prod_lt_prod' f g (λ i hi, (hlt i hi).le) $ (exists_mem_of_ne_nil l hl).imp $ λ i hi, ⟨hi, hlt i hi⟩
@[to_additive sum_le_card_nsmul]
lemma prod_le_pow_card [preorder M]
[covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)]
(l : list M) (n : M) (h : ∀ (x ∈ l), x ≤ n) :
l.prod ≤ n ^ l.length :=
by simpa only [map_id'', map_const, prod_repeat] using prod_le_prod' h
@[to_additive exists_lt_of_sum_lt] lemma exists_lt_of_prod_lt' [linear_order M]
[covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)] {l : list ι}
(f g : ι → M) (h : (l.map f).prod < (l.map g).prod) :
∃ i ∈ l, f i < g i :=
by { contrapose! h, exact prod_le_prod' h }
@[to_additive exists_le_of_sum_le]
lemma exists_le_of_prod_le' [linear_order M] [covariant_class M M (*) (<)]
[covariant_class M M (*) (≤)] [covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (<)]
[covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)] {l : list ι} (hl : l ≠ [])
(f g : ι → M) (h : (l.map f).prod ≤ (l.map g).prod) :
∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x :=
by { contrapose! h, exact prod_lt_prod_of_ne_nil hl _ _ h }
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le [preorder M] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)] {l : list M}
(hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : M) ≤ x) :
1 ≤ l.prod :=
begin
-- We don't use `pow_card_le_prod` to avoid assumption
-- [covariant_class M M (function.swap (*)) (≤)]
induction l with hd tl ih, { refl },
rw prod_cons,
exact one_le_mul (hl₁ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)) (ih (λ x h, hl₁ x (mem_cons_of_mem hd h)))
end
end monoid
section monoid_with_zero
variables [monoid_with_zero M₀]
/-- If zero is an element of a list `L`, then `list.prod L = 0`. If the domain is a nontrivial
monoid with zero with no divisors, then this implication becomes an `iff`, see
`list.prod_eq_zero_iff`. -/
lemma prod_eq_zero {L : list M₀} (h : (0 : M₀) ∈ L) : L.prod = 0 :=
begin
induction L with a L ihL,
{ exact absurd h (not_mem_nil _) },
{ rw prod_cons,
cases (mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h with ha hL,
exacts [mul_eq_zero_of_left ha.symm _, mul_eq_zero_of_right _ (ihL hL)] }
end
/-- Product of elements of a list `L` equals zero if and only if `0 ∈ L`. See also
`list.prod_eq_zero` for an implication that needs weaker typeclass assumptions. -/
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_zero_iff [nontrivial M₀] [no_zero_divisors M₀] {L : list M₀} :
L.prod = 0 ↔ (0 : M₀) ∈ L :=
begin
induction L with a L ihL,
{ simp },
{ rw [prod_cons, mul_eq_zero, ihL, mem_cons_iff, eq_comm] }
end
lemma prod_ne_zero [nontrivial M₀] [no_zero_divisors M₀] {L : list M₀} (hL : (0 : M₀) ∉ L) :
L.prod ≠ 0 :=
mt prod_eq_zero_iff.1 hL
end monoid_with_zero
section group
variables [group G]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv_rev` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg_rev`"]
lemma prod_inv_reverse : ∀ (L : list G), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).reverse.prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [prod_inv_reverse xs]
/-- A non-commutative variant of `list.prod_reverse` -/
@[to_additive "A non-commutative variant of `list.sum_reverse`"]
lemma prod_reverse_noncomm : ∀ (L : list G), L.reverse.prod = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod⁻¹ :=
by simp [prod_inv_reverse]
/-- Counterpart to `list.prod_take_succ` when we have an inverse operation -/
@[simp, to_additive /-"Counterpart to `list.sum_take_succ` when we have an negation operation"-/]
lemma prod_drop_succ :
∀ (L : list G) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.drop (i + 1)).prod = (L.nth_le i p)⁻¹ * (L.drop i).prod
| [] i p := false.elim (nat.not_lt_zero _ p)
| (x :: xs) 0 p := by simp
| (x :: xs) (i + 1) p := prod_drop_succ xs i _
end group
section comm_group
variables [comm_group G]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg`"]
lemma prod_inv : ∀ (L : list G), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [mul_comm, prod_inv xs]
/-- Alternative version of `list.prod_update_nth` when the list is over a group -/
@[to_additive /-"Alternative version of `list.sum_update_nth` when the list is over a group"-/]
lemma prod_update_nth' (L : list G) (n : ℕ) (a : G) :
(L.update_nth n a).prod =
L.prod * (if hn : n < L.length then (L.nth_le n hn)⁻¹ * a else 1) :=
begin
refine (prod_update_nth L n a).trans _,
split_ifs with hn hn,
{ rw [mul_comm _ a, mul_assoc a, prod_drop_succ L n hn, mul_comm _ (drop n L).prod,
← mul_assoc (take n L).prod, prod_take_mul_prod_drop, mul_comm a, mul_assoc] },
{ simp only [take_all_of_le (le_of_not_lt hn), prod_nil, mul_one,
drop_eq_nil_of_le ((le_of_not_lt hn).trans n.le_succ)] }
end
end comm_group
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_prod_take_eq [left_cancel_monoid M] {L L' : list M} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).prod = (L'.take i).prod) : L = L' :=
begin
apply ext_le h (λ i h₁ h₂, _),
have : (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L'.take (i + 1)).prod := h' _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁),
rw [prod_take_succ L i h₁, prod_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this,
convert mul_left_cancel this
end
@[to_additive]
lemma monotone_prod_take [canonically_ordered_monoid M] (L : list M) :
monotone (λ i, (L.take i).prod) :=
begin
apply monotone_nat_of_le_succ (λ n, _),
cases lt_or_le n L.length with h h,
{ rw prod_take_succ _ _ h,
exact le_self_mul },
{ simp [take_all_of_le h, take_all_of_le (le_trans h (nat.le_succ _))] }
end
@[to_additive sum_pos]
lemma one_lt_prod_of_one_lt [ordered_comm_monoid M] :
∀ (l : list M) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : M) < x) (hl₂ : l ≠ []), 1 < l.prod
| [] _ h := (h rfl).elim
| [b] h _ := by simpa using h
| (a :: b :: l) hl₁ hl₂ :=
begin
simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, list.mem_cons_iff _ a] at hl₁,
rw list.prod_cons,
apply one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' hl₁.1,
apply le_of_lt ((b :: l).one_lt_prod_of_one_lt hl₁.2 (l.cons_ne_nil b)),
end
@[to_additive]
lemma single_le_prod [ordered_comm_monoid M] {l : list M} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : M) ≤ x) :
∀ x ∈ l, x ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
simp_rw [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at ⊢ hl₁,
split,
{ exact le_mul_of_one_le_right' (one_le_prod_of_one_le hl₁.2) },
{ exact λ x H, le_mul_of_one_le_of_le hl₁.1 (l_ih hl₁.right x H) },
end
@[to_additive all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero]
lemma all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one [ordered_comm_monoid M]
{l : list M} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : M) ≤ x) (hl₂ : l.prod = 1) {x : M} (hx : x ∈ l) :
x = 1 :=
le_antisymm (hl₂ ▸ single_le_prod hl₁ _ hx) (hl₁ x hx)
/-- Slightly more general version of `list.prod_eq_one_iff` for a non-ordered `monoid` -/
@[to_additive "Slightly more general version of `list.sum_eq_zero_iff`
for a non-ordered `add_monoid`"]
lemma prod_eq_one [monoid M] {l : list M} (hl : ∀ (x ∈ l), x = (1 : M)) : l.prod = 1 :=
begin
induction l with i l hil,
{ refl },
rw [list.prod_cons, hil (λ x hx, hl _ (mem_cons_of_mem i hx)), hl _ (mem_cons_self i l), one_mul]
end
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_mem_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one [monoid M] {l : list M} (h : l.prod ≠ 1) :
∃ (x ∈ l), x ≠ (1 : M) :=
by simpa only [not_forall] using mt prod_eq_one h
-- TODO: develop theory of tropical rings
lemma sum_le_foldr_max [add_monoid M] [add_monoid N] [linear_order N] (f : M → N)
(h0 : f 0 ≤ 0) (hadd : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ max (f x) (f y)) (l : list M) :
f l.sum ≤ (l.map f).foldr max 0 :=
begin
induction l with hd tl IH,
{ simpa using h0 },
simp only [list.sum_cons, list.foldr_map, list.foldr] at IH ⊢,
exact (hadd _ _).trans (max_le_max le_rfl IH)
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_erase [decidable_eq M] [comm_monoid M] {a} :
∀ {l : list M}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b :: l) h :=
begin
obtain rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩ := decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_map_erase [decidable_eq ι] [comm_monoid M] (f : ι → M) {a} :
∀ {l : list ι}, a ∈ l → f a * ((l.erase a).map f).prod = (l.map f).prod
| (b :: l) h :=
begin
obtain rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩ := decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h,
{ simp only [map, erase_cons_head, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [map, erase_cons_tail _ ne.symm, prod_cons, prod_map_erase h,
mul_left_comm (f a) (f b)], }
end
@[simp] lemma sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
/-- The product of a list of positive natural numbers is positive,
and likewise for any nontrivial ordered semiring. -/
lemma prod_pos [strict_ordered_semiring R] (l : list R) (h : ∀ a ∈ l, (0 : R) < a) : 0 < l.prod :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ simp },
{ rw prod_cons,
exact mul_pos (h _ $ mem_cons_self _ _) (ih $ λ a ha, h a $ mem_cons_of_mem _ ha) }
end
/-!
Several lemmas about sum/head/tail for `list ℕ`.
These are hard to generalize well, as they rely on the fact that `default ℕ = 0`.
If desired, we could add a class stating that `default = 0`.
-/
/-- This relies on `default ℕ = 0`. -/
lemma head_add_tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl }, { simp } }
/-- This relies on `default ℕ = 0`. -/
lemma head_le_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head ≤ L.sum := nat.le.intro (head_add_tail_sum L)
/-- This relies on `default ℕ = 0`. -/
lemma tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.tail.sum = L.sum - L.head :=
by rw [← head_add_tail_sum L, add_comm, add_tsub_cancel_right]
section alternating
section
variables [has_one α] [has_mul α] [has_inv α]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_nil : alternating_prod ([] : list α) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_singleton (a : α) : alternating_prod [a] = a := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_cons_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
alternating_prod (a :: b :: l) = a * b⁻¹ * alternating_prod l := rfl
end
@[to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_cons_cons [div_inv_monoid α] (a b : α) (l : list α) :
alternating_prod (a :: b :: l) = a / b * alternating_prod l :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, alternating_prod_cons_cons']
variables [comm_group α]
@[to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_cons' :
∀ (a : α) (l : list α), alternating_prod (a :: l) = a * (alternating_prod l)⁻¹
| a [] := by rw [alternating_prod_nil, inv_one, mul_one, alternating_prod_singleton]
| a (b :: l) :=
by rw [alternating_prod_cons_cons', alternating_prod_cons' b l, mul_inv, inv_inv, mul_assoc]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
alternating_prod (a :: l) = a / alternating_prod l :=
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, alternating_prod_cons']
end alternating
end list
section monoid_hom
variables [monoid M] [monoid N]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_list_prod {F : Type*} [monoid_hom_class F M N] (f : F)
(l : list M) : f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
(l.prod_hom f).symm
namespace monoid_hom
/-- Deprecated, use `_root_.map_list_prod` instead. -/
@[to_additive "Deprecated, use `_root_.map_list_sum` instead."]
protected lemma map_list_prod (f : M →* N) (l : list M) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
map_list_prod f l
end monoid_hom
end monoid_hom
|
043428b4190fa29433c10eac2345eb3f0ad1311f | 0bd6c950c82dcba3e46dc8d8acb5ecc60b917520 | /ramsey.lean | 534c1c0f0c4fbc593ef3cbc9471719a8438f3cce | [] | no_license | truonghoangle/formalabstracts | 976dbbdede5c71346a3c534a8f319456248d4610 | b889ec60143315053a51b1829a5dc4d82ba503b3 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,899,948,798 | 1,537,184,894,000 | 1,537,184,894,000 | 140,428,980 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,243 | lean |
import data.set.finite
open set
variables α : Type
variable [decidable_eq α]
theorem infinite_ramsey (s :set α) (C:finset α → ℕ ) (m n:ℕ):
infinite s ∧
(∀ t:finset α, t.to_set ⊆ s ∧ t.card = n → C t≤ m)
→ ∃ t c, infinite t ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
(∀ u:finset α, u.to_set ⊆ t ∧ u.card =n → C u = c)
:=
begin
end
def complete_graph (s:finset(finset α )):Prop:=
(∀ t:finset α, t∈ s → t.card =2) ∧
(∀ t:finset α, t ∈ finset.powerset( s.bind (λ t,t)) ∧ t.card=2 → t ∈ s )
def complete_k_graph (s:finset(finset α )) (k:ℕ):Prop:=
(∀ t:finset α, t∈ s → t.card =k) ∧
(∀ t:finset α, t ∈ finset.powerset( s.bind (λ t,t)) ∧ t.card=k → t ∈ s )
theorem ramsey2 (M N:ℕ ):
∃ (n : ℕ) (s:finset(finset α )),
complete_graph _ s ∧
( s.bind (λ t,t)).card =n ∧
∀ (c : finset α → ℕ),
(∀ (t : finset α), t ∈ s → c t ≤ 1) →
(∃ r t : finset(finset α ),
r ⊆ s ∧ complete_graph _ r ∧
t ⊆ s ∧ complete_graph _ t ∧
(∀ (e : finset α), e ∈ t → c e = 0) ∧
(∀ (e : finset α), e ∈ r → c e = 1) ∧ ( t.bind (λ t,t)).card =M ∧
( r.bind (λ t,t)).card =N)
:=
begin
end
theorem colours_ramsey (S:finset ℕ ):
∃ (n : ℕ) (s : finset(finset α)),
complete_graph _ s ∧
( s.bind (λ t,t)).card =n ∧
∀ (c : finset α → ℕ),
(∀ (t : finset α), t ∈ s → c t ≤ S.card ) →
∀ (ci : ℕ),ci ∈ S →
(∃ (ri : finset(finset α )) (cc:ℕ ),
ri ⊆ s ∧ complete_graph _ ri ∧
( ri.bind (λ t,t)).card = ci ∧
∀ (x : finset α), x ∈ ri → c x = cc )
:=
begin
end
theorem ramsey2_hypergraph (M N k:ℕ ):
∃ (n : ℕ) (s:finset(finset α )),
complete_k_graph _ s k ∧
( s.bind (λ t,t)).card =n ∧
∀ (c : finset α → ℕ),
(∀ (t : finset α), t ∈ s → c t ≤ 1) →
(∃ r t : finset(finset α ),
r ⊆ s ∧ complete_k_graph _ r k ∧
t ⊆ s ∧ complete_k_graph _ t k ∧
(∀ (e : finset α), e ∈ t → c e = 0) ∧
(∀ (e : finset α), e ∈ r → c e = 1) ∧ ( t.bind (λ t,t)).card =M ∧
( r.bind (λ t,t)).card =N)
:=
begin
end
theorem colours_ramsey_hypergraph (S:finset ℕ) (k:ℕ):
∃ (n : ℕ) (s : finset(finset α)),
complete_k_graph _ s k ∧
( s.bind (λ t,t)).card =n ∧
∀ (c : finset α → ℕ),
(∀ (t : finset α), t ∈ s → c t ≤ S.card ) →
∀ (ci : ℕ), ci ∈ S →
(∃ (ri : finset(finset α )) (cc:ℕ ),
ri ⊆ s ∧ complete_k_graph _ ri k ∧
( ri.bind (λ t,t)).card = ci ∧
∀ (x : finset α), x ∈ ri → c x = cc )
:=
begin
end
def complete_graph_v1 (s:finset α ):finset(finset α):=
(finset.powerset s).filter (λ t:finset α, t.card =2)
def complete_k_graph_v1 (s:(finset α )) (k:ℕ):finset(finset α) :=
(finset.powerset s).filter (λ t:finset α, t.card =k)
theorem ramsey2_v1 (M N:ℕ ):
∃ (n : ℕ) (s:finset α ),
s.card =n ∧
∀ (c : finset α → ℕ),
(∀ (t : finset α), t ∈ (complete_graph_v1 α s) → c t ≤ 1) →
(∃ r t : finset α,
r ⊆ s ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
(∀ (e : finset α), e ∈ (complete_graph_v1 _ r) → c e = 0) ∧
(∀ (e : finset α), e ∈ complete_graph_v1 _ t → c e = 1) ∧
t.card =M ∧ r.card =N)
:=
begin
end
theorem colours_ramsey_v1 (S:finset ℕ ):
∃ (n : ℕ) (s :(finset α)),
s.card =n ∧
∀ (c : finset α → ℕ),
(∀ (t : finset α), t ∈ complete_graph_v1 _ s → c t ≤ S.card ) →
∀ (ci : ℕ), ci ∈ S →
(∃ (ri : finset α ) (cc:ℕ ),
ri ⊆ s ∧ ri.card = ci ∧
∀ (x : finset α), x ∈ complete_graph_v1 _ ri → c x = cc )
:=
begin
end
theorem ramsey2_hypergraph_v1 (M N k:ℕ ):
∃ (n : ℕ) (s:(finset α )),
s.card =n ∧
∀ (c : finset α → ℕ),
(∀ (t : finset α), t ∈ (complete_k_graph_v1 _ s k) → c t ≤ 1) →
(∃ r t : finset α ,
r ∈ (complete_k_graph_v1 _ s M) ∧
t ∈ (complete_k_graph_v1 _ s N) ∧
(∀ (e : finset α), e ∈ (complete_k_graph_v1 _ r k) → c e = 0) ∧
(∀ (e : finset α), e ∈ (complete_k_graph_v1 _ t k) → c e = 1))
:=
begin
end
theorem colours_ramsey_hypergraph_v1 (S:finset ℕ) (k:ℕ):
∃ (n : ℕ) (s :finset α),
( s.card =n ∧
∀ (c : finset α → ℕ),
(∀ (t : finset α), t ∈ (complete_k_graph_v1 _ s k) → c t ≤ S.card ) →
∀ (ci : ℕ), ci ∈ S →
(∃ (ri : finset α ) (cc:ℕ ),
ri ∈ (complete_k_graph_v1 _ s ci)∧
∀ (x : finset α), x ∈ (complete_k_graph_v1 _ ri k) → c x = cc ))
:=
begin
end
|
64728665ea6fb06098ff77a20aa72d3e64f52d5a | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/data/fintype/intervals.lean | 430b3d03efe8f4a4cbfce302326809201cae6e05 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,623 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import data.set.intervals
import data.set.finite
import data.fintype.basic
import data.pnat.intervals
/-!
# fintype instances for intervals
We provide `fintype` instances for `Ico l u`, for `l u : ℕ`, and for `l u : ℤ`.
-/
namespace set
instance Ico_ℕ_fintype (l u : ℕ) : fintype (Ico l u) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.Ico l u) $
(λ n, by { simp only [mem_Ico, finset.Ico.mem], })
@[simp] lemma Ico_ℕ_card (l u : ℕ) : fintype.card (Ico l u) = u - l :=
calc fintype.card (Ico l u) = (finset.Ico l u).card : fintype.card_of_finset _ _
... = u - l : finset.Ico.card l u
instance Ico_pnat_fintype (l u : ℕ+) : fintype (Ico l u) :=
fintype.of_finset (pnat.Ico l u) $
(λ n, by { simp only [mem_Ico, pnat.Ico.mem], })
@[simp] lemma Ico_pnat_card (l u : ℕ+) : fintype.card (Ico l u) = u - l :=
calc fintype.card (Ico l u) = (pnat.Ico l u).card : fintype.card_of_finset _ _
... = u - l : pnat.Ico.card l u
instance Ico_ℤ_fintype (l u : ℤ) : fintype (Ico l u) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.Ico_ℤ l u) $
(λ n, by { simp only [mem_Ico, finset.Ico_ℤ.mem], })
@[simp] lemma Ico_ℤ_card (l u : ℤ) : fintype.card (Ico l u) = (u - l).to_nat :=
calc fintype.card (Ico l u) = (finset.Ico_ℤ l u).card : fintype.card_of_finset _ _
... = (u - l).to_nat : finset.Ico_ℤ.card l u
-- TODO other useful instances: fin n, zmod?
end set
|
af432be9b1e929c1def81d14194cd83039142f28 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/ring_theory/flat.lean | 8eff39776ef51e61ff778c0d8560051ee472e067 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,682 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import linear_algebra.dimension
import ring_theory.noetherian
import ring_theory.algebra_tower
/-!
# Flat modules
A module `M` over a commutative ring `R` is *flat*
if for all finitely generated ideals `I` of `R`,
the canonical map `I ⊗ M →ₗ M` is injective.
This is equivalent to the claim that for all injective `R`-linear maps `f : M₁ → M₂`
the induced map `M₁ ⊗ M → M₂ ⊗ M` is injective.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00HD>.
This result is not yet formalised.
## Main declaration
* `module.flat`: the predicate asserting that an `R`-module `M` is flat.
## TODO
* Show that tensoring with a flat module preserves injective morphisms.
Show that this is equivalent to be flat.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00HD>.
To do this, it is probably a good idea to think about a suitable
categorical induction principle that should be applied to the category of `R`-modules,
and that will take care of the administrative side of the proof.
* Define flat `R`-algebras
* Define flat ring homomorphisms
- Show that the identity is flat
- Show that composition of flat morphisms is flat
* Show that flatness is stable under base change (aka extension of scalars)
For base change, it will be very useful to have a "characteristic predicate"
instead of relying on the construction `A ⊗ B`.
Indeed, such a predicate should allow us to treat both
`polynomial A` and `A ⊗ polynomial R` as the base change of `polynomial R` to `A`.
(Similar examples exist with `fin n → R`, `R × R`, `ℤ[i] ⊗ ℝ`, etc...)
* Generalize flatness to noncommutative rings.
-/
universe variables u v
namespace module
open function (injective)
open linear_map (lsmul)
open_locale tensor_product
/-- An `R`-module `M` is flat if for all finitely generated ideals `I` of `R`,
the canonical map `I ⊗ M →ₗ M` is injective. -/
class flat (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] : Prop :=
(out : ∀ ⦃I : ideal R⦄ (hI : I.fg), injective (tensor_product.lift ((lsmul R M).comp I.subtype)))
namespace flat
open tensor_product linear_map submodule
instance self (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] : flat R R :=
⟨begin
intros I hI,
rw ← equiv.injective_comp (tensor_product.rid R I).symm.to_equiv,
convert subtype.coe_injective using 1,
ext x,
simp only [function.comp_app, linear_equiv.coe_to_equiv, rid_symm_apply, comp_apply,
mul_one, lift.tmul, subtype_apply, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, lsmul_apply]
end⟩
end flat
end module
|
616aeeda330193fc1f5f1d54bc1e9317b39a365d | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Elab/PreDefinition/Structural/Eqns.lean | 21c990b4c613da5b0f45d9d1acbbbbcaa3ee6417 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,900 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Eqns
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Split
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.Main
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Apply
import Lean.Elab.PreDefinition.Basic
import Lean.Elab.PreDefinition.Eqns
import Lean.Elab.PreDefinition.Structural.Basic
namespace Lean.Elab
open Meta
open Eqns
namespace Structural
structure EqnInfo extends EqnInfoCore where
recArgPos : Nat
deriving Inhabited
private partial def mkProof (declName : Name) (type : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
trace[Elab.definition.structural.eqns] "proving: {type}"
withNewMCtxDepth do
let main ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar type
let (_, mvarId) ← main.mvarId!.intros
unless (← tryURefl mvarId) do -- catch easy cases
go (← deltaLHS mvarId)
instantiateMVars main
where
go (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM Unit := do
trace[Elab.definition.structural.eqns] "step\n{MessageData.ofGoal mvarId}"
if (← tryURefl mvarId) then
return ()
else if (← tryContradiction mvarId) then
return ()
else if let some mvarId ← simpMatch? mvarId then
go mvarId
else if let some mvarId ← simpIf? mvarId then
go mvarId
else if let some mvarId ← whnfReducibleLHS? mvarId then
go mvarId
else match (← simpTargetStar mvarId {}).1 with
| TacticResultCNM.closed => return ()
| TacticResultCNM.modified mvarId => go mvarId
| TacticResultCNM.noChange =>
if let some mvarId ← deltaRHS? mvarId declName then
go mvarId
else if let some mvarIds ← casesOnStuckLHS? mvarId then
mvarIds.forM go
else if let some mvarIds ← splitTarget? mvarId then
mvarIds.forM go
else
throwError "failed to generate equational theorem for '{declName}'\n{MessageData.ofGoal mvarId}"
def mkEqns (info : EqnInfo) : MetaM (Array Name) :=
withOptions (tactic.hygienic.set · false) do
let eqnTypes ← withNewMCtxDepth <| lambdaTelescope info.value fun xs body => do
let us := info.levelParams.map mkLevelParam
let target ← mkEq (mkAppN (Lean.mkConst info.declName us) xs) body
let goal ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar target
mkEqnTypes #[info.declName] goal.mvarId!
let baseName := mkPrivateName (← getEnv) info.declName
let mut thmNames := #[]
for i in [: eqnTypes.size] do
let type := eqnTypes[i]!
trace[Elab.definition.structural.eqns] "{eqnTypes[i]!}"
let name := baseName ++ (`_eq).appendIndexAfter (i+1)
thmNames := thmNames.push name
let value ← mkProof info.declName type
let (type, value) ← removeUnusedEqnHypotheses type value
addDecl <| Declaration.thmDecl {
name, type, value
levelParams := info.levelParams
}
return thmNames
builtin_initialize eqnInfoExt : MapDeclarationExtension EqnInfo ← mkMapDeclarationExtension
def registerEqnsInfo (preDef : PreDefinition) (recArgPos : Nat) : CoreM Unit := do
modifyEnv fun env => eqnInfoExt.insert env preDef.declName { preDef with recArgPos }
def getEqnsFor? (declName : Name) : MetaM (Option (Array Name)) := do
if let some info := eqnInfoExt.find? (← getEnv) declName then
mkEqns info
else
return none
def getUnfoldFor? (declName : Name) : MetaM (Option Name) := do
let env ← getEnv
Eqns.getUnfoldFor? declName fun _ => eqnInfoExt.find? env declName |>.map (·.toEqnInfoCore)
@[export lean_get_structural_rec_arg_pos]
def getStructuralRecArgPosImp? (declName : Name) : CoreM (Option Nat) := do
let some info := eqnInfoExt.find? (← getEnv) declName | return none
return some info.recArgPos
builtin_initialize
registerGetEqnsFn getEqnsFor?
registerGetUnfoldEqnFn getUnfoldFor?
registerTraceClass `Elab.definition.structural.eqns
end Structural
end Lean.Elab
|
07342249087b57057f3784becec1c23c0f669826 | 3618c6e11aa822fd542440674dfb9a7b9921dba0 | /scratch/golf.lean | e44bfd44a63fa6121de5d34f459ae237ff81587c | [] | no_license | ChrisHughes24/single_relation | 99ceedcc02d236ce46d6c65d72caa669857533c5 | 057e157a59de6d0e43b50fcb537d66792ec20450 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,652,062,698 | 1,683,360,089,000 | 1,683,360,089,000 | 279,346,432 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,693 | lean | import .base_case tactic
open free_group multiplicative
variables {ι : Type} [decidable_eq ι]
def golf_single_aux (r : free_group ι) : Π (w : free_group ι) (wl : ℕ), free_group ι
| w wl :=
let wr := w * r in
let wrl := wr.to_list.length in
if h : wrl < wl
then golf_single_aux wr wrl
else w
using_well_founded { rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf psigma.snd⟩] }
/-- Returns the shortest word of the form `w * r^n` with `n ∈ ℤ` -/
def golf_single (r : free_group ι) (w : free_group ι) : free_group ι :=
let wr := w * r in
let wrl := wr.to_list.length in
let wl := w.to_list.length in
if wrl < wl
then golf_single_aux r wr wrl
else
let rn := r⁻¹ in
let wrn := w * rn in
let wrnl := wrn.to_list.length in
if wrnl < wl
then golf_single_aux rn wrn wrnl
else w
#eval golf_single (of "a") (of "a")
def golf_right (r : free_group ι) : Π (w : free_group ι) (wl : ℕ), free_group ι × ℕ
| w wl :=
let rw := r * w in
let rwl := rw.to_list.length in
if h : rwl < wl
then let g := golf_right rw rwl in (g.1, g.2 + 1)
else (rw, 0)
using_well_founded { rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf psigma.snd⟩] }
def golf_aux (r : free_group ι) : free_group (free_group ι) →
free_group (free_group ι) × bool
| ⟨[], _⟩ := (1, ff)
| ⟨[i], _⟩ := (⟨[i], sorry⟩, ff)
| ⟨(i::j::l), _⟩ :=
let ε : ℤ := int.sign (to_add i.2) in
let iri := (mul_aut.conj i.1) (r ^ ε) in
let (g, n) := golf_right iri j.1 j.1.to_list.length in
let gl := golf_right (of' j.1 j.2 * ⟨l, sorry⟩) in
golf_aux (of' i.1 (i.2 * of_add (ε * n)))
using_well_founded { dec_tac := sorry } |
d46ff35b0ef33753e56b51733705300ed8780a89 | 74a42606b2a618112114eacdd674a7cc28b585c4 | /tpl-sec5.lean | e9413cb027de8bb7cc620629c72594eca462e2df | [] | no_license | Hodapp87/leanprover_scratch | 8c53ce6d9e666f8f14cb6162c9e9429ebbecbc8c | de347c54ee56c2a05804f80d5f28e98070507236 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,428,204,434 | 1,484,350,758,000 | 1,484,350,758,000 | 77,873,828 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,784 | lean | -- https://leanprover.github.io/theorem_proving_in_lean/index.html
-- Section 5 (Tactics)
theorem test (p q : Prop) (hp : p) (hq : q) : p ∧ q ∧ p :=
begin
apply and.intro,
exact hp,
apply and.intro,
exact hq,
exact hp
end
print test
-- This looks very Coq-like to me (perhaps intentionally, since Roesch
-- spoke very highly of Coq's tactics as something that Idris and Agda
-- were missing).
-- Helpful:
-- "You can write a tactic script incrementally. If you run Lean on an
-- incomplete tactic proof bracketed by begin and end, the system
-- reports all the unsolved goals that remain. If you are running Lean
-- with its Emacs interface, you can see this information by putting
-- your cursor on the end symbol, which should be underlined. In the
-- Emacs interface, there is another extremely useful trick: if you
-- put your cursor on a line of a tactic proof and press "C-c C-g",
-- Lean will show you the goal that remains at the end of the line."
-- Equivalent:
theorem test2 (p q : Prop) (hp : p) (hq : q) : p ∧ q ∧ p :=
begin
apply and.intro hp,
exact and.intro hq hp
end
print test2
-- Also equivalent:
theorem test3 (p q : Prop) (hp : p) (hq : q) : p ∧ q ∧ p :=
by exact and.intro hp (and.intro hq hp)
print test3
section example1
variables {p q : Prop} (hp : p) (hq : q)
include hp hq
example : p ∧ q ∧ p :=
begin
apply and.intro hp,
exact and.intro hq hp
end
end example1
-- "We adopt the following convention regarding indentation: whenever
-- a tactic introduces one or more additional subgoals, we indent
-- another two spaces, until the additional subgoals are deleted."
example (p q r : Prop) : p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
intro h, -- 1st subgoal (iff.intro)
apply or.elim (and.elim_right h),
intro hq, -- 1st subsubgoal
apply or.intro_left,
apply and.intro, -- 2 subsubsubgoals:
exact and.elim_left h,
exact hq,
intro hr, -- 2nd subsubgoal
apply or.intro_right,
apply and.intro, -- 2 subsubsubgoals:
exact and.elim_left h,
exact hr,
intro h, -- 2nd subgoal (iff.intro)
apply or.elim h,
intro hpq,
apply and.intro,
exact and.elim_left hpq,
apply or.intro_left,
exact and.elim_right hpq,
intro hpr,
apply and.intro,
exact and.elim_left hpr,
apply or.intro_right,
exact and.elim_right hpr
end
section example_assumption
variables {x y z w : Prop}
example (h₁ : x = y) (h₂ : y = z) (h₃ : z = w) : x = w :=
begin
apply eq.trans h₁,
apply eq.trans h₂,
assumption -- applied h₃
end
example (h₁ : x = y) (h₂ : y = z) (h₃ : z = w) : x = w :=
begin
apply eq.trans,
assumption, -- solves x = ?m_1 with h₁
apply eq.trans,
assumption, -- solves y = ?m_1 with h₂
assumption -- solves z = w with h₃
end
end example_assumption
example : ∀ a b c : ℕ, a = b → a = c → c = b :=
begin
intros,
apply eq.trans,
apply eq.symm,
assumption,
assumption
end
-- Same as previous:
example : ∀ a b c : ℕ, a = b → a = c → c = b :=
begin
intros,
transitivity,
symmetry,
assumption,
assumption
end
-- Or:
example : ∀ a b c : ℕ, a = b → a = c → c = b :=
begin
intros,
transitivity,
symmetry,
repeat { assumption }
end
example : ∃ a : ℕ, a = a :=
begin
fapply exists.intro,
exact 0,
apply rfl
end
section example_generalize
variables x y z : ℕ
example : x = x :=
begin
generalize x z, -- goal is x : ℕ ⊢ ∀ (z : ℕ), z = z
intro y, -- goal is x y : ℕ ⊢ y = y
reflexivity
end
-- I still don't totally get this...
example : x + y + z = x + y + z :=
begin
generalize (x + y + z) w, -- goal is x y z : ℕ ⊢ ∀ (w : ℕ), w = w
intro u, -- goal is x y z u : ℕ ⊢ u = u
reflexivity
end
example : x + y + z = x + y + z :=
begin
generalize (x + y + z) w, -- goal is x y z : ℕ ⊢ ∀ (w : ℕ), w = w
clear x y z,
intro u, -- goal is u : ℕ ⊢ u = u
reflexivity
end
end example_generalize
example (x : ℕ) : x = x :=
begin
revert x, -- goal is ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), x = x
intro y, -- goal is y : ℕ ⊢ y = y
reflexivity
end
-- "Moving a hypothesis into the goal yields an implication:" (Is it
-- sort of the opposite of 'intro' then?)
example (x y : ℕ) (h : x = y) : y = x :=
begin
revert h, -- goal is x y : ℕ ⊢ x = y → y = x
intro h₁, -- goal is x y : ℕ, h₁ : x = y ⊢ y = x
symmetry,
assumption
end
-- "reverting x in the example above brings h along with it:"
example (x y : ℕ) (h : x = y) : y = x :=
begin
revert x, -- goal is y : ℕ ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), x = y → y = x
intros,
symmetry,
assumption
end
example (x y : ℕ) (h : x = y) : y = x :=
begin
revert x y, -- goal is ⊢ ∀ (x y : ℕ), x = y → y = x
intros,
symmetry,
assumption
end
-- to create disjunction: left = apply or.inl, right = apply or.inr
-- to decompose disjunction: 'cases' tactic
example (p q : Prop) : p ∨ q → q ∨ p :=
begin
intro h,
cases h with hp hq,
-- case hp : p
right, exact hp,
-- case hq : q
left, exact hq
end
example (p q : Prop) : p ∧ q → q ∧ p :=
begin
intro h,
-- Also works for conjunction (or any inductively-defined type):
cases h with hp hq,
-- 'constructor' applies first constructor of inductive type (first?
-- what?)
constructor, exact hq, exact hp
end
section swap
universe variables u v
def swap_pair {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : α × β → β × α :=
begin
intro p,
cases p with ha hb,
constructor, exact hb, exact ha
end
def swap_sum {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : α ⊕ β → β ⊕ α :=
begin
intro p,
cases p with ha hb,
right, exact ha,
left, exact hb
end
end swap
section nats
open nat
example (P : ℕ → Prop) (h₀ : P 0) (h₁ : ∀ n, P (succ n)) (m : ℕ) : P m :=
begin
cases m with m', exact h₀, exact h₁ m'
end
end nats
-- My term-style solution (from section 3):
example (p q r : Prop) : p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
iff.intro
(assume h : p ∧ (q ∨ r),
(show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r), from
and.elim h
(assume hp : p, assume hqr : q ∨ r,
or.elim hqr
(assume hq : q, or.inl (and.intro hp hq))
(assume hr : r, or.inr (and.intro hp hr)))))
(assume h : (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
(show p ∧ (q ∨ r), from
or.elim h
(assume hpq : (p ∧ q),
have hp : p, from and.left hpq,
have hqr : q ∨ r, from or.inl (and.right hpq),
and.intro hp hqr)
(assume hpr : (p ∧ r),
have hp : p, from and.left hpr,
have hqr : q ∨ r, from or.inr (and.right hpr),
and.intro hp hqr)))
-- Their tactic-style solution:
example (p q r : Prop) : p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
intro h,
cases h with hp hqr,
cases hqr with hq hr,
left, constructor, repeat { assumption },
right, constructor, repeat { assumption },
intro h,
cases h with hpq hpr,
cases hpq with hp hq,
constructor, exact hp, left, exact hq,
cases hpr with hp hr,
constructor, exact hp, right, exact hr
end
-- Their solution combining both styles:
example (p q r : Prop) : p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
intro h,
cases h^.right with hq hr,
exact
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
from or.inl ⟨h^.left, hq⟩,
exact
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
from or.inr ⟨h^.left, hr⟩,
intro h,
cases h with hpq hpr,
exact
show p ∧ (q ∨ r),
from ⟨hpq^.left, or.inl hpq^.right⟩,
exact show p ∧ (q ∨ r),
from ⟨hpr^.left, or.inr hpr^.right⟩
end
-- "One thing that is nice about Lean's proof-writing syntax is that
-- it is possible to mix term-style and tactic-style proofs, and pass
-- between the two freely. For example, the tactics apply and exact
-- expect arbitrary terms, which you can write using have, show, and
-- so on. Conversely, when writing an arbitrary Lean term, you can
-- always invoke the tactic mode by inserting a begin...end block. "
-- Even further, using "show p, from t" for "exact (show p, from t)":
example (p q r : Prop) : p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
intro h,
cases h^.right with hq hr,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
from or.inl ⟨h^.left, hq⟩,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
from or.inr ⟨h^.left, hr⟩,
intro h,
cases h with hpq hpr,
show p ∧ (q ∨ r),
from ⟨hpq^.left, or.inl hpq^.right⟩,
show p ∧ (q ∨ r),
from ⟨hpr^.left, or.inr hpr^.right⟩
end
-- Further still, using "have p, from t₁, t₂" for
-- "exact (have p, from t₁, t₂)":
example (p q r : Prop) : p ∧ (q ∨ r) → (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
intro h,
have hp : p, from h^.left,
have hqr : q ∨ r, from h^.right,
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
begin
cases hqr with hq hr,
exact or.inl ⟨hp, hq⟩,
exact or.inr ⟨hp, hr⟩
end
end
-- { & } act like nested begin/end:
example (p q r : Prop) : p ∧ (q ∨ r) ↔ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
{ intro h,
cases h^.right with hq hr,
{ show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
from or.inl ⟨h^.left, hq⟩ },
show (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r),
from or.inr ⟨h^.left, hr⟩ },
intro h,
cases h with hpq hpr,
{ show p ∧ (q ∨ r),
from ⟨hpq^.left, or.inl hpq^.right⟩ },
show p ∧ (q ∨ r),
from ⟨hpr^.left, or.inr hpr^.right⟩
end
-- Note that an unsolved goal at "end" (or a closing bracket)
-- generates an error; use this to keep goals lined up.
-- Their convention: "every time a tactic leaves more than one
-- subgoal, we separate the remaining subgoals by enclosing them in
-- blocks and indenting, until we are back down to one subgoal" Note
-- that this differs a bit from what one might naturally expect,
-- e.g. indenting all subgoals including the last.
example (p q : Prop) : p ∧ q ↔ q ∧ p :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
{ intro h,
-- 'assert' creates subgoals, and the term hangs around in the
-- context after that subgoal is proved:
assert hp : p, exact h^.left,
assert hq : q, exact h^.right,
exact ⟨hq, hp⟩ },
intro h,
assert hp : p, exact h^.right,
assert hq : q, exact h^.left,
exact ⟨hp, hq⟩
end
-- Another way ('note' inserts a fact into the context):
example (p q : Prop) : p ∧ q ↔ q ∧ p :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
{ intro h,
note hp := h^.left,
note hq := h^.right,
exact ⟨hq, hp⟩ },
intro h,
note hp := h^.right,
note hq := h^.left,
exact ⟨hp, hq⟩
end
-- But with 'note' you can't get at the contents (not totally sure
-- what this means), whereas with 'pose' you can:
example : ∃ x : ℕ, x + 3 = 8 :=
begin
pose x := 5,
existsi x,
reflexivity
end
example (p q : Prop) : p ∧ q → q ∧ p :=
begin
intro h,
split,
{ change q,
-- I don't understand the point of 'change' here. I can remove it
-- and not change anything.
exact h^.right },
change p,
exact h^.left
end
example (a b : ℕ) (h : a = b) : a + 0 = b + 0 :=
begin
change a = b,
assumption
end
example (a b c : ℕ) (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b = c) : a = c :=
begin
transitivity,
change _ = b, assumption,
assumption
end
-- "In this example, after the transitivity tactic is applied, there
-- are two goals, a = ?m_1 and ?m_1 = c. After the change, the two
-- goals have been specialized to a = b and b = c."
section rewrite1
variables (f : ℕ → ℕ) (k : ℕ)
example (h₁ : f 0 = 0) (h₂ : k = 0) : f k = 0 :=
begin
rw h₂, -- replace k with 0
rw h₁ -- replace f 0 with 0
end
-- Identical:
example (h₁ : f 0 = 0) (h₂ : k = 0) : f k = 0 :=
begin
rw [h₂, h₁]
end
end rewrite1
section rewrite2
variables (f : ℕ → ℕ) (a b : ℕ)
example (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : f a = 0) : f b = 0 :=
begin
-- Rewriting in reverse direction of equality (see minus sign):
rw [-h₁, h₂]
end
end rewrite2
-- Clarifying a rewrite with an argument:
example (a b c : ℕ) : a + b + c = a + c + b :=
begin
rw [add_assoc, add_comm b, -add_assoc]
end
example (a b c : ℕ) : a + b + c = a + c + b :=
begin
rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, add_comm b]
end
example (a b c : ℕ) : a + b + c = a + c + b :=
begin
rw [add_assoc, add_assoc, add_comm _ b]
end
-- Applying to specific hypothesis:
section rewrite3
variables (f : ℕ → ℕ) (a : ℕ)
example (h : a + 0 = 0) : f a = f 0 :=
begin
rw add_zero at h, rw h
end
end rewrite3
section rewrite4
universe variable u
def tuple (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) := { l : list α // list.length l = n }
variables {α : Type u} {n : ℕ}
-- Note that propositions are just types, and 'rewrite' can work
-- more generally on types other than Prop:
example (h : n = 0) (t : tuple α n) : tuple α 0 :=
begin
rw h at t,
exact t
end
end rewrite4
-- Examples of 'simp' (much more automated than 'rewrite'):
section simplify1
variables (x y z : ℕ) (p : ℕ → Prop)
premise (h : p (x * y))
example : (x + 0) * (0 + y * 1 + z * 0) = x * y :=
by simp
include h
example : p ((x + 0) * (0 + y * 1 + z * 0)) :=
begin simp, assumption end
-- Simplify a hypothesis:
example (h : p ((x + 0) * (0 + y * 1 + z * 0))) : p (x * y) :=
begin simp at h, assumption end
end simplify1
-- Below, I redo some of the section 4 exercises in tactic style
-- rather than term style:
section exercises44a
variables (α : Type) (p q : α → Prop)
-- "Notice that the declaration variable a : α amounts to the
-- assumption that there is at least one element of type α. This
-- assumption is needed in the second example, as well as in the
-- last two." (This sounds kinda... nonconstructive.)
variable a : α
variable r : Prop
example : (∃ x, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∨ (∃ x, q x) :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
-- How do I start a begin/end block in Emacs, leave it empty, and
-- still have C-c C-g tell me the current goal? All I want to do
-- is work incrementally.
{ intro h,
cases h with x hpq,
cases hpq with hp hq,
left, existsi x, exact hp,
right, existsi x, exact hq },
intro h,
cases h with hp hq,
cases hp with x hpx,
existsi x, left, exact hpx,
cases hq with x hpq,
existsi x, right, exact hpq,
end
end exercises44a
|
421b11ef7bd2665aa801423029193de3bdcfa321 | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/category_theory/concrete_category/default.lean | 23b547fc38ceba04956f7a3fea1db2f341f02c37 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 204 | lean | import category_theory.concrete_category.basic
import category_theory.concrete_category.bundled
import category_theory.concrete_category.bundled_hom
import category_theory.concrete_category.unbundled_hom
|
c958434ea4c2f0c1ffdbe71c5a98c05f370616a9 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/topology/uniform_space/completion.lean | 4e3385e7a837638e6aeaa4fb26728cd15ddcd54f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,226 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
Hausdorff completions of uniform spaces.
The goal is to construct a left-adjoint to the inclusion of complete Hausdorff uniform spaces
into all uniform spaces. Any uniform space `α` gets a completion `completion α` and a morphism
(ie. uniformly continuous map) `completion : α → completion α` which solves the universal
mapping problem of factorizing morphisms from `α` to any complete Hausdorff uniform space `β`.
It means any uniformly continuous `f : α → β` gives rise to a unique morphism
`completion.extension f : completion α → β` such that `f = completion.extension f ∘ completion α`.
Actually `completion.extension f` is defined for all maps from `α` to `β` but it has the desired
properties only if `f` is uniformly continuous.
Beware that `completion α` is not injective if `α` is not Hausdorff. But its image is always
dense. The adjoint functor acting on morphisms is then constructed by the usual abstract nonsense.
For every uniform spaces `α` and `β`, it turns `f : α → β` into a morphism
`completion.map f : completion α → completion β`
such that
`coe ∘ f = (completion.map f) ∘ coe`
provided `f` is uniformly continuous. This construction is compatible with composition.
In this file we introduce the following concepts:
* `Cauchy α` the uniform completion of the uniform space `α` (using Cauchy filters). These are not
minimal filters.
* `completion α := quotient (separation_setoid (Cauchy α))` the Hausdorff completion.
This formalization is mostly based on
N. Bourbaki: General Topology
I. M. James: Topologies and Uniformities
From a slightly different perspective in order to reuse material in topology.uniform_space.basic.
-/
import topology.uniform_space.abstract_completion
noncomputable theory
open filter set
universes u v w x
open_locale uniformity classical topological_space
/-- Space of Cauchy filters
This is essentially the completion of a uniform space. The embeddings are the neighbourhood filters.
This space is not minimal, the separated uniform space (i.e. quotiented on the intersection of all
entourages) is necessary for this.
-/
def Cauchy (α : Type u) [uniform_space α] : Type u := { f : filter α // cauchy f }
namespace Cauchy
section
parameters {α : Type u} [uniform_space α]
variables {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
variables [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ]
def gen (s : set (α × α)) : set (Cauchy α × Cauchy α) :=
{p | s ∈ filter.prod (p.1.val) (p.2.val) }
lemma monotone_gen : monotone gen :=
monotone_set_of $ assume p, @monotone_mem_sets (α×α) (filter.prod (p.1.val) (p.2.val))
private lemma symm_gen : map prod.swap ((𝓤 α).lift' gen) ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' gen :=
calc map prod.swap ((𝓤 α).lift' gen) =
(𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), {p | s ∈ filter.prod (p.2.val) (p.1.val) }) :
begin
delta gen,
simp [map_lift'_eq, monotone_set_of, monotone_mem_sets,
function.comp, image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' gen :
uniformity_lift_le_swap
(monotone_principal.comp (monotone_set_of $ assume p,
@monotone_mem_sets (α×α) ((filter.prod ((p.2).val) ((p.1).val)))))
begin
have h := λ(p:Cauchy α×Cauchy α), @filter.prod_comm _ _ (p.2.val) (p.1.val),
simp [function.comp, h],
exact le_refl _
end
private lemma comp_rel_gen_gen_subset_gen_comp_rel {s t : set (α×α)} : comp_rel (gen s) (gen t) ⊆
(gen (comp_rel s t) : set (Cauchy α × Cauchy α)) :=
assume ⟨f, g⟩ ⟨h, h₁, h₂⟩,
let ⟨t₁, (ht₁ : t₁ ∈ f.val), t₂, (ht₂ : t₂ ∈ h.val), (h₁ : set.prod t₁ t₂ ⊆ s)⟩ :=
mem_prod_iff.mp h₁ in
let ⟨t₃, (ht₃ : t₃ ∈ h.val), t₄, (ht₄ : t₄ ∈ g.val), (h₂ : set.prod t₃ t₄ ⊆ t)⟩ :=
mem_prod_iff.mp h₂ in
have t₂ ∩ t₃ ∈ h.val,
from inter_mem_sets ht₂ ht₃,
let ⟨x, xt₂, xt₃⟩ :=
nonempty_of_mem_sets (h.property.left) this in
(filter.prod f.val g.val).sets_of_superset
(prod_mem_prod ht₁ ht₄)
(assume ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨(ha : a ∈ t₁), (hb : b ∈ t₄)⟩,
⟨x,
h₁ (show (a, x) ∈ set.prod t₁ t₂, from ⟨ha, xt₂⟩),
h₂ (show (x, b) ∈ set.prod t₃ t₄, from ⟨xt₃, hb⟩)⟩)
private lemma comp_gen :
((𝓤 α).lift' gen).lift' (λs, comp_rel s s) ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' gen :=
calc ((𝓤 α).lift' gen).lift' (λs, comp_rel s s) =
(𝓤 α).lift' (λs, comp_rel (gen s) (gen s)) :
begin
rw [lift'_lift'_assoc],
exact monotone_gen,
exact (monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id)
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' (λs, gen $ comp_rel s s) :
lift'_mono' $ assume s hs, comp_rel_gen_gen_subset_gen_comp_rel
... = ((𝓤 α).lift' $ λs:set(α×α), comp_rel s s).lift' gen :
begin
rw [lift'_lift'_assoc],
exact (monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id),
exact monotone_gen
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' gen : lift'_mono comp_le_uniformity (le_refl _)
instance : uniform_space (Cauchy α) :=
uniform_space.of_core
{ uniformity := (𝓤 α).lift' gen,
refl := principal_le_lift' $ assume s hs ⟨a, b⟩ (a_eq_b : a = b),
a_eq_b ▸ a.property.right hs,
symm := symm_gen,
comp := comp_gen }
theorem mem_uniformity {s : set (Cauchy α × Cauchy α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 (Cauchy α) ↔ ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, gen t ⊆ s :=
mem_lift'_sets monotone_gen
theorem mem_uniformity' {s : set (Cauchy α × Cauchy α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 (Cauchy α) ↔ ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α,
∀ f g : Cauchy α, t ∈ filter.prod f.1 g.1 → (f, g) ∈ s :=
mem_uniformity.trans $ bex_congr $ λ t h, prod.forall
/-- Embedding of `α` into its completion -/
def pure_cauchy (a : α) : Cauchy α :=
⟨pure a, cauchy_pure⟩
lemma uniform_inducing_pure_cauchy : uniform_inducing (pure_cauchy : α → Cauchy α) :=
⟨have (preimage (λ (x : α × α), (pure_cauchy (x.fst), pure_cauchy (x.snd))) ∘ gen) = id,
from funext $ assume s, set.ext $ assume ⟨a₁, a₂⟩,
by simp [preimage, gen, pure_cauchy, prod_principal_principal],
calc comap (λ (x : α × α), (pure_cauchy (x.fst), pure_cauchy (x.snd))) ((𝓤 α).lift' gen)
= (𝓤 α).lift' (preimage (λ (x : α × α), (pure_cauchy (x.fst), pure_cauchy (x.snd))) ∘ gen) :
comap_lift'_eq monotone_gen
... = 𝓤 α : by simp [this]⟩
lemma uniform_embedding_pure_cauchy : uniform_embedding (pure_cauchy : α → Cauchy α) :=
{ inj := assume a₁ a₂ h, pure_inj $ subtype.ext.1 h,
..uniform_inducing_pure_cauchy }
lemma pure_cauchy_dense : ∀x, x ∈ closure (range pure_cauchy) :=
assume f,
have h_ex : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 (Cauchy α), ∃y:α, (f, pure_cauchy y) ∈ s, from
assume s hs,
let ⟨t'', ht''₁, (ht''₂ : gen t'' ⊆ s)⟩ := (mem_lift'_sets monotone_gen).mp hs in
let ⟨t', ht'₁, ht'₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets ht''₁ in
have t' ∈ filter.prod (f.val) (f.val),
from f.property.right ht'₁,
let ⟨t, ht, (h : set.prod t t ⊆ t')⟩ := mem_prod_same_iff.mp this in
let ⟨x, (hx : x ∈ t)⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets f.property.left ht in
have t'' ∈ filter.prod f.val (pure x),
from mem_prod_iff.mpr ⟨t, ht, {y:α | (x, y) ∈ t'},
h $ mk_mem_prod hx hx,
assume ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨(h₁ : a ∈ t), (h₂ : (x, b) ∈ t')⟩,
ht'₂ $ prod_mk_mem_comp_rel (@h (a, x) ⟨h₁, hx⟩) h₂⟩,
⟨x, ht''₂ $ by dsimp [gen]; exact this⟩,
begin
simp [closure_eq_nhds, nhds_eq_uniformity, lift'_inf_principal_eq, set.inter_comm],
exact (lift'_ne_bot_iff $ monotone_inter monotone_const monotone_preimage).mpr
(assume s hs,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := h_ex s hs in
have pure_cauchy y ∈ range pure_cauchy ∩ {y : Cauchy α | (f, y) ∈ s},
from ⟨mem_range_self y, hy⟩,
⟨_, this⟩)
end
lemma dense_inducing_pure_cauchy : dense_inducing pure_cauchy :=
uniform_inducing_pure_cauchy.dense_inducing pure_cauchy_dense
lemma dense_embedding_pure_cauchy : dense_embedding pure_cauchy :=
uniform_embedding_pure_cauchy.dense_embedding pure_cauchy_dense
lemma nonempty_Cauchy_iff : nonempty (Cauchy α) ↔ nonempty α :=
begin
split ; rintro ⟨c⟩,
{ have := eq_univ_iff_forall.1 dense_embedding_pure_cauchy.to_dense_inducing.closure_range c,
obtain ⟨_, ⟨_, a, _⟩⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 this _ is_open_univ trivial,
exact ⟨a⟩ },
{ exact ⟨pure_cauchy c⟩ }
end
section
set_option eqn_compiler.zeta true
instance : complete_space (Cauchy α) :=
complete_space_extension
uniform_inducing_pure_cauchy
pure_cauchy_dense $
assume f hf,
let f' : Cauchy α := ⟨f, hf⟩ in
have map pure_cauchy f ≤ (𝓤 $ Cauchy α).lift' (preimage (prod.mk f')),
from le_lift' $ assume s hs,
let ⟨t, ht₁, (ht₂ : gen t ⊆ s)⟩ := (mem_lift'_sets monotone_gen).mp hs in
let ⟨t', ht', (h : set.prod t' t' ⊆ t)⟩ := mem_prod_same_iff.mp (hf.right ht₁) in
have t' ⊆ { y : α | (f', pure_cauchy y) ∈ gen t },
from assume x hx, (filter.prod f (pure x)).sets_of_superset (prod_mem_prod ht' hx) h,
f.sets_of_superset ht' $ subset.trans this (preimage_mono ht₂),
⟨f', by simp [nhds_eq_uniformity]; assumption⟩
end
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (Cauchy α) :=
⟨pure_cauchy $ default α⟩
instance [h : nonempty α] : nonempty (Cauchy α) :=
h.rec_on $ assume a, nonempty.intro $ Cauchy.pure_cauchy a
section extend
def extend (f : α → β) : (Cauchy α → β) :=
if uniform_continuous f then
dense_inducing_pure_cauchy.extend f
else
λ x, f (classical.inhabited_of_nonempty $ nonempty_Cauchy_iff.1 ⟨x⟩).default
variables [separated β]
lemma extend_pure_cauchy {f : α → β} (hf : uniform_continuous f) (a : α) :
extend f (pure_cauchy a) = f a :=
begin
rw [extend, if_pos hf],
exact uniformly_extend_of_ind uniform_inducing_pure_cauchy pure_cauchy_dense hf _
end
variables [_root_.complete_space β]
lemma uniform_continuous_extend {f : α → β} : uniform_continuous (extend f) :=
begin
by_cases hf : uniform_continuous f,
{ rw [extend, if_pos hf],
exact uniform_continuous_uniformly_extend uniform_inducing_pure_cauchy pure_cauchy_dense hf },
{ rw [extend, if_neg hf],
exact uniform_continuous_of_const (assume a b, by congr) }
end
end extend
end
theorem Cauchy_eq
{α : Type*} [inhabited α] [uniform_space α] [complete_space α] [separated α] {f g : Cauchy α} :
lim f.1 = lim g.1 ↔ (f, g) ∈ separation_rel (Cauchy α) :=
begin
split,
{ intros e s hs,
rcases Cauchy.mem_uniformity'.1 hs with ⟨t, tu, ts⟩,
apply ts,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets tu with ⟨d, du, dt⟩,
refine mem_prod_iff.2
⟨_, le_nhds_lim_of_cauchy f.2 (mem_nhds_right (lim f.1) du),
_, le_nhds_lim_of_cauchy g.2 (mem_nhds_left (lim g.1) du), λ x h, _⟩,
cases x with a b, cases h with h₁ h₂,
rw ← e at h₂,
exact dt ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ intros H,
refine separated_def.1 (by apply_instance) _ _ (λ t tu, _),
rcases mem_uniformity_is_closed tu with ⟨d, du, dc, dt⟩,
refine H {p | (lim p.1.1, lim p.2.1) ∈ t}
(Cauchy.mem_uniformity'.2 ⟨d, du, λ f g h, _⟩),
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨x, xf, y, yg, h⟩,
have limc : ∀ (f : Cauchy α) (x ∈ f.1), lim f.1 ∈ closure x,
{ intros f x xf,
rw closure_eq_nhds,
exact ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot f.2.1
(le_inf (le_nhds_lim_of_cauchy f.2) (le_principal_iff.2 xf)) },
have := (closure_subset_iff_subset_of_is_closed dc).2 h,
rw closure_prod_eq at this,
refine dt (this ⟨_, _⟩); dsimp; apply limc; assumption }
end
section
local attribute [instance] uniform_space.separation_setoid
lemma injective_separated_pure_cauchy {α : Type*} [uniform_space α] [s : separated α] :
function.injective (λa:α, ⟦pure_cauchy a⟧) | a b h :=
separated_def.1 s _ _ $ assume s hs,
let ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ :=
by rw [← (@uniform_embedding_pure_cauchy α _).comap_uniformity, filter.mem_comap_sets] at hs; exact hs in
have (pure_cauchy a, pure_cauchy b) ∈ t, from quotient.exact h t ht,
@hts (a, b) this
end
end Cauchy
local attribute [instance] uniform_space.separation_setoid
open Cauchy set
namespace uniform_space
variables (α : Type*) [uniform_space α]
variables {β : Type*} [uniform_space β]
variables {γ : Type*} [uniform_space γ]
instance complete_space_separation [h : complete_space α] :
complete_space (quotient (separation_setoid α)) :=
⟨assume f, assume hf : cauchy f,
have cauchy (f.comap (λx, ⟦x⟧)), from
cauchy_comap comap_quotient_le_uniformity hf $
comap_ne_bot_of_surj hf.left $ assume b, quotient.exists_rep _,
let ⟨x, (hx : f.comap (λx, ⟦x⟧) ≤ 𝓝 x)⟩ := complete_space.complete this in
⟨⟦x⟧, calc f = map (λx, ⟦x⟧) (f.comap (λx, ⟦x⟧)) :
(map_comap $ univ_mem_sets' $ assume b, quotient.exists_rep _).symm
... ≤ map (λx, ⟦x⟧) (𝓝 x) : map_mono hx
... ≤ _ : continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp uniform_continuous_quotient_mk.continuous _⟩⟩
/-- Hausdorff completion of `α` -/
def completion := quotient (separation_setoid $ Cauchy α)
namespace completion
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (completion α) :=
by unfold completion; apply_instance
@[priority 50]
instance : uniform_space (completion α) := by dunfold completion ; apply_instance
instance : complete_space (completion α) := by dunfold completion ; apply_instance
instance : separated (completion α) := by dunfold completion ; apply_instance
instance : t2_space (completion α) := separated_t2
instance : regular_space (completion α) := separated_regular
/-- Automatic coercion from `α` to its completion. Not always injective. -/
instance : has_coe_t α (completion α) := ⟨quotient.mk ∘ pure_cauchy⟩ -- note [use has_coe_t]
protected lemma coe_eq : (coe : α → completion α) = quotient.mk ∘ pure_cauchy := rfl
lemma comap_coe_eq_uniformity :
(𝓤 _).comap (λ(p:α×α), ((p.1 : completion α), (p.2 : completion α))) = 𝓤 α :=
begin
have : (λx:α×α, ((x.1 : completion α), (x.2 : completion α))) =
(λx:(Cauchy α)×(Cauchy α), (⟦x.1⟧, ⟦x.2⟧)) ∘ (λx:α×α, (pure_cauchy x.1, pure_cauchy x.2)),
{ ext ⟨a, b⟩; simp; refl },
rw [this, ← filter.comap_comap_comp],
change filter.comap _ (filter.comap _ (𝓤 $ quotient $ separation_setoid $ Cauchy α)) = 𝓤 α,
rw [comap_quotient_eq_uniformity, uniform_embedding_pure_cauchy.comap_uniformity]
end
lemma uniform_inducing_coe : uniform_inducing (coe : α → completion α) :=
⟨comap_coe_eq_uniformity α⟩
variables {α}
lemma dense : dense_range (coe : α → completion α) :=
begin
rw [dense_range_iff_closure_range, completion.coe_eq, range_comp],
exact quotient_dense_of_dense pure_cauchy_dense
end
variables (α)
def cpkg {α : Type*} [uniform_space α] : abstract_completion α :=
{ space := completion α,
coe := coe,
uniform_struct := by apply_instance,
complete := by apply_instance,
separation := by apply_instance,
uniform_inducing := completion.uniform_inducing_coe α,
dense := completion.dense }
instance abstract_completion.inhabited : inhabited (abstract_completion α) :=
⟨cpkg⟩
local attribute [instance]
abstract_completion.uniform_struct abstract_completion.complete abstract_completion.separation
lemma nonempty_completion_iff : nonempty (completion α) ↔ nonempty α :=
(dense_range.nonempty (cpkg.dense)).symm
lemma uniform_continuous_coe : uniform_continuous (coe : α → completion α) :=
cpkg.uniform_continuous_coe
lemma continuous_coe : continuous (coe : α → completion α) :=
cpkg.continuous_coe
lemma uniform_embedding_coe [separated α] : uniform_embedding (coe : α → completion α) :=
{ comap_uniformity := comap_coe_eq_uniformity α,
inj := injective_separated_pure_cauchy }
variable {α}
lemma dense_inducing_coe : dense_inducing (coe : α → completion α) :=
{ dense := dense,
..(uniform_inducing_coe α).inducing }
lemma dense_embedding_coe [separated α]: dense_embedding (coe : α → completion α) :=
{ inj := injective_separated_pure_cauchy,
..dense_inducing_coe }
lemma dense₂ : dense_range (λx:α × β, ((x.1 : completion α), (x.2 : completion β))) :=
dense.prod dense
lemma dense₃ :
dense_range (λx:α × (β × γ), ((x.1 : completion α), ((x.2.1 : completion β), (x.2.2 : completion γ)))) :=
dense.prod dense₂
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction_on {p : completion α → Prop}
(a : completion α) (hp : is_closed {a | p a}) (ih : ∀a:α, p a) : p a :=
is_closed_property dense hp ih a
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction_on₂ {p : completion α → completion β → Prop}
(a : completion α) (b : completion β)
(hp : is_closed {x : completion α × completion β | p x.1 x.2})
(ih : ∀(a:α) (b:β), p a b) : p a b :=
have ∀x : completion α × completion β, p x.1 x.2, from
is_closed_property dense₂ hp $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, ih a b,
this (a, b)
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction_on₃ {p : completion α → completion β → completion γ → Prop}
(a : completion α) (b : completion β) (c : completion γ)
(hp : is_closed {x : completion α × completion β × completion γ | p x.1 x.2.1 x.2.2})
(ih : ∀(a:α) (b:β) (c:γ), p a b c) : p a b c :=
have ∀x : completion α × completion β × completion γ, p x.1 x.2.1 x.2.2, from
is_closed_property dense₃ hp $ assume ⟨a, b, c⟩, ih a b c,
this (a, b, c)
lemma ext [t2_space β] {f g : completion α → β} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g)
(h : ∀a:α, f a = g a) : f = g :=
cpkg.funext hf hg h
section extension
variables {f : α → β}
/-- "Extension" to the completion. It is defined for any map `f` but
returns an arbitrary constant value if `f` is not uniformly continuous -/
protected def extension (f : α → β) : completion α → β :=
cpkg.extend f
variables [separated β]
@[simp] lemma extension_coe (hf : uniform_continuous f) (a : α) : (completion.extension f) a = f a :=
cpkg.extend_coe hf a
variables [complete_space β]
lemma uniform_continuous_extension : uniform_continuous (completion.extension f) :=
cpkg.uniform_continuous_extend
lemma continuous_extension : continuous (completion.extension f) :=
cpkg.continuous_extend
lemma extension_unique (hf : uniform_continuous f) {g : completion α → β} (hg : uniform_continuous g)
(h : ∀ a : α, f a = g (a : completion α)) : completion.extension f = g :=
cpkg.extend_unique hf hg h
@[simp] lemma extension_comp_coe {f : completion α → β} (hf : uniform_continuous f) :
completion.extension (f ∘ coe) = f :=
cpkg.extend_comp_coe hf
end extension
section map
variables {f : α → β}
/-- Completion functor acting on morphisms -/
protected def map (f : α → β) : completion α → completion β :=
cpkg.map cpkg f
lemma uniform_continuous_map : uniform_continuous (completion.map f) :=
cpkg.uniform_continuous_map cpkg f
lemma continuous_map : continuous (completion.map f) :=
cpkg.continuous_map cpkg f
@[simp] lemma map_coe (hf : uniform_continuous f) (a : α) : (completion.map f) a = f a :=
cpkg.map_coe cpkg hf a
lemma map_unique {f : α → β} {g : completion α → completion β}
(hg : uniform_continuous g) (h : ∀a:α, ↑(f a) = g a) : completion.map f = g :=
cpkg.map_unique cpkg hg h
@[simp] lemma map_id : completion.map (@id α) = id :=
cpkg.map_id
lemma extension_map [complete_space γ] [separated γ] {f : β → γ} {g : α → β}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hg : uniform_continuous g) :
completion.extension f ∘ completion.map g = completion.extension (f ∘ g) :=
completion.ext (continuous_extension.comp continuous_map) continuous_extension $
by intro a; simp only [hg, hf, hf.comp hg, (∘), map_coe, extension_coe]
lemma map_comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : uniform_continuous g) (hf : uniform_continuous f) :
completion.map g ∘ completion.map f = completion.map (g ∘ f) :=
extension_map ((uniform_continuous_coe _).comp hg) hf
end map
/- In this section we construct isomorphisms between the completion of a uniform space and the
completion of its separation quotient -/
section separation_quotient_completion
def completion_separation_quotient_equiv (α : Type u) [uniform_space α] :
completion (separation_quotient α) ≃ completion α :=
begin
refine ⟨completion.extension (separation_quotient.lift (coe : α → completion α)),
completion.map quotient.mk, _, _⟩,
{ assume a,
refine induction_on a (is_closed_eq (continuous_map.comp continuous_extension) continuous_id) _,
rintros ⟨a⟩,
show completion.map quotient.mk (completion.extension (separation_quotient.lift coe) ↑⟦a⟧) = ↑⟦a⟧,
rw [extension_coe (separation_quotient.uniform_continuous_lift _),
separation_quotient.lift_mk (uniform_continuous_coe α),
completion.map_coe uniform_continuous_quotient_mk] ; apply_instance },
{ assume a,
refine completion.induction_on a (is_closed_eq (continuous_extension.comp continuous_map) continuous_id) _,
assume a,
rw [map_coe uniform_continuous_quotient_mk,
extension_coe (separation_quotient.uniform_continuous_lift _),
separation_quotient.lift_mk (uniform_continuous_coe α) _] ; apply_instance }
end
lemma uniform_continuous_completion_separation_quotient_equiv :
uniform_continuous ⇑(completion_separation_quotient_equiv α) :=
uniform_continuous_extension
lemma uniform_continuous_completion_separation_quotient_equiv_symm :
uniform_continuous ⇑(completion_separation_quotient_equiv α).symm :=
uniform_continuous_map
end separation_quotient_completion
section extension₂
variables (f : α → β → γ)
open function
protected def extension₂ (f : α → β → γ) : completion α → completion β → γ :=
cpkg.extend₂ cpkg f
variables [separated γ] {f}
@[simp] lemma extension₂_coe_coe (hf : uniform_continuous₂ f) (a : α) (b : β) :
completion.extension₂ f a b = f a b :=
cpkg.extension₂_coe_coe cpkg hf a b
variables [complete_space γ] (f)
lemma uniform_continuous_extension₂ : uniform_continuous₂ (completion.extension₂ f) :=
cpkg.uniform_continuous_extension₂ cpkg f
end extension₂
section map₂
open function
protected def map₂ (f : α → β → γ) : completion α → completion β → completion γ :=
cpkg.map₂ cpkg cpkg f
lemma uniform_continuous_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) : uniform_continuous₂ (completion.map₂ f) :=
cpkg.uniform_continuous_map₂ cpkg cpkg f
lemma continuous_map₂ {δ} [topological_space δ] {f : α → β → γ}
{a : δ → completion α} {b : δ → completion β} (ha : continuous a) (hb : continuous b) :
continuous (λd:δ, completion.map₂ f (a d) (b d)) :=
cpkg.continuous_map₂ cpkg cpkg ha hb
lemma map₂_coe_coe (a : α) (b : β) (f : α → β → γ) (hf : uniform_continuous₂ f) :
completion.map₂ f (a : completion α) (b : completion β) = f a b :=
cpkg.map₂_coe_coe cpkg cpkg a b f hf
end map₂
end completion
end uniform_space
|
5865ae61d38e318078c2af6c4328cdf624fd19e8 | b4a7d9c9980fc97e8ea50eaec4d4dab5467ec1ff | /docs/hlm/experimental/lean/hlm-defs.lean | 82c84feeb1b3cb6385deea7362c76d71a28446e0 | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | SReichelt/slate | 27fe8b4f162338460334d86cca640f6dabb24b00 | e7d8d3cfd1b8311b7d1026e1b83add345db2e0bd | refs/heads/master | 1,674,179,982,128 | 1,670,018,304,000 | 1,670,018,304,000 | 167,445,060 | 18 | 1 | MIT | 1,673,266,820,000 | 1,548,367,505,000 | TypeScript | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,696 | lean | /-
This file experimentally maps the primitives of the HLM logic to the Lean proof assistant.
In particular, for HLM parameters of type `Set`, `Subset`, and `Element`, we provide three
Lean types with the same names. Some usage examples are included at the bottom.
The translation serves several purposes:
* It gives HLM expressions an unambiguous meaning via their corresponding Lean expressions
(even in cases like homomorphisms between equivalence classes of structures, where the
mathematical meaning could be in doubt).
* It can serve as a basis for independent checking of the library.
* If a theorem has been proved in HLM, the corresponding Lean theorem and proof can be
used in other Lean libraries. (However, complicated structures are always difficult to
translate between libraries.)
* Conversely, a Lean proof of a translated statement could be accepted as a proof of the
original statement.
* The definitions in this file provide an alternative way of dealing with sets in Lean,
which could be useful in itself. (Unfortunately, it requires many trivial proofs, which
can be generated automatically when translating from HLM, but which need to be written
manually otherwise. Perhaps it is possible to write Lean tactics for them.)
The most idiomatic translation of HLM sets to Lean would be as follows:
* An HLM parameter `S: Set` ("let S be a set") is simply translated to `S : Type*`, with
the intention of translating subsets as subtypes wherever applicable.
* An HLM parameter `T: Subset(S)` ("let T ⊆ S") is translated to `T : set S` if `S` is of
(HLM) type `Set`, or `T : set (subtype S)` if `S` if of (HLM) type `Subset`.
* An HLM parameter `x: Element(S)` ("let x ∈ S") is translated to `x : S` if `S` is of
(HLM) type `Set`, or `x : subtype S` if `S` if of (HLM) type `Subset`. (An alternative
translation for the second case would simply be `x ∈ S`, which uses special Lean
syntactic sugar.)
However, the following (pseudocode) translation more closely matches the HLM-specific
concept of sets:
* An HLM parameter `S: Set` ("let S be a set") is translated to `S : Set`, where
`structure Set := (α : Type u) (s : set α)`.
That is, `Set` bundles a Lean type with a Lean set of that type.
* An HLM parameter `T: Subset(S)` ("let T ⊆ S") is translated to `T : Subset S`, where
`structure Subset (S : {Set | Subset ?}) := (s : set S.α) (is_subset : s ⊆ S.s)`.
That is, `Subset` inherits the type `α` from the given superset. (In reality, `S.α` does
not work if `S` is itself of type `Subset`; this is solved using type classes.) It
bundles a set of that type with a proof that this set is indeed a subset of the given
argument.
* An HLM parameter `x: Element(S)` ("let x ∈ S") is translated to `x : Element S`, where
`structure Element (S : {Set | Subset ?}) := (a : S.α) (is_element : a ∈ S.s)`.
The `Element` structure simply bundles an element of the required type with a proof that
it is indeed an element of the given set. Note that this is exactly the same as
`subtype S.s`.
These definitions translate the type system of HLM, in the sense that a translated
expression is well-typed in Lean if and only if the original expression is well-typed in
HLM.
These definitions would be sufficient to translate simple definitions, but not HLM
constructions that contain sets: Their custom equality definition in HLM necessarily
identifies isomorphic elements, but it is still possible to obtain "arbitrary
representatives" of such sets and even return them (or elements of them, etc.) from
definitions. When working with concrete instances of such structures, one can then infer
information about specific sets, not just equivalence classes.
Therefore, when translating a construction with a custom equality definition, we cannot
immediately take the quotient with respect to that equality definition (as that would lose
too much information), but we need to bundle the equality definition together with the type
(as a setoid), and use it whenever we translate a formula containing "=". Specifically, in
the pseudo-definitions above, we replace α with a new structure called `BaseType`.
Sets of a given `BaseType` must respect the equality definition, in the sense that two
HLM-equal objects must either both be in the set or both not be in the set. This is encoded
in the structure `BaseSet`. (Equivalently, we could define `BaseSet` as a set of quotients.)
Each translated definitions must also respect the equality definition "in the obvious way".
This file is known to compile in Lean 3.4.2 and 3.17.1.
-/
namespace hlm
-- Conjunction and disjunction are dependent in HLM.
-- This is equivalent to a sigma type; can it be simplified?
def and_dep {left : Prop} (right : left → Prop) := left ∧ (Π l : left, right l)
def and_dep_left {left : Prop} {right : left → Prop} (h : and_dep (λ l : left, right l)) := and.left h
def and_dep_right {left : Prop} {right : left → Prop} (h : and_dep (λ l : left, right l)) := and.right h (and_dep_left h)
universes u v
structure BaseType := (α : Type u) (equality : setoid α)
instance BaseType_is_setoid {base_type : BaseType} : setoid base_type.α := base_type.equality
def make_base_type (α : Type u) (equality : α → α → Prop) (is_equivalence : equivalence equality) := BaseType.mk α (setoid.mk equality is_equivalence)
def base_class_of {base_type : BaseType} (x : base_type.α) := ⟦x⟧
def base_equals {base_type : BaseType} (x y : base_type.α) := x ≈ y
@[refl] lemma base_refl {base_type : BaseType} (x : base_type.α) : base_equals x x := setoid.refl x
@[symm] lemma base_symm {base_type : BaseType} {x y : base_type.α} (h1 : base_equals x y) : base_equals y x := setoid.symm h1
@[trans] lemma base_trans {base_type : BaseType} {x y z : base_type.α} (h1 : base_equals x y) (h2 : base_equals y z) : base_equals x z := setoid.trans h1 h2
def lean_type_to_base_type (α : Type u) := make_base_type α (=) ⟨@eq.refl _, @eq.symm _, @eq.trans _⟩
def lean_set_respects_equality (base_type : BaseType) (lean_set : set base_type.α) := ∀ x y : base_type.α, base_equals x y → x ∈ lean_set → y ∈ lean_set
structure BaseSet (base_type : BaseType) := (lean_set : set base_type.α) (respects_equality : lean_set_respects_equality base_type lean_set)
def make_base_set (base_type : BaseType) (lean_set : set base_type.α) (respects_equality : lean_set_respects_equality base_type lean_set) := @BaseSet.mk base_type lean_set respects_equality
def universal_base_set {base_type : BaseType} := make_base_set base_type set.univ (λ _ _ _ _, trivial)
def lean_set_to_base_set {α : Type u} (lean_set : set α) := make_base_set (lean_type_to_base_type α) lean_set (λ _ _, eq.subst)
structure BaseElement {base_type : BaseType} (base_set: BaseSet base_type) := (element : base_type.α) (is_element : element ∈ base_set.lean_set)
def make_base_element {base_type : BaseType} (base_set: BaseSet base_type) (element : base_type.α) (is_element : element ∈ base_set.lean_set) : BaseElement base_set := @BaseElement.mk base_type base_set element is_element
def class_of {base_type : BaseType} {base_set: BaseSet base_type} (x : BaseElement base_set) :=
base_class_of x.element
def equals {base_type : BaseType} {x_base_set: BaseSet base_type} (x : BaseElement x_base_set) {y_base_set: BaseSet base_type} (y : BaseElement y_base_set) :=
base_equals x.element y.element
@[refl] lemma refl {base_type : BaseType} {x_base_set: BaseSet base_type} (x : BaseElement x_base_set) : equals x x := base_refl x.element
@[symm] lemma symm {base_type : BaseType} {x_base_set: BaseSet base_type} {x : BaseElement x_base_set} {y_base_set: BaseSet base_type} {y : BaseElement y_base_set} (h1 : equals x y) : equals y x := base_symm h1
@[trans] lemma trans {base_type : BaseType} {x_base_set: BaseSet base_type} {x : BaseElement x_base_set} {y_base_set: BaseSet base_type} {y : BaseElement y_base_set} {z_base_set: BaseSet base_type} {z : BaseElement z_base_set} (h1 : equals x y) (h2 : equals y z) : equals x z := base_trans h1 h2
class has_base_type (H : Sort v) := (base_type : H → BaseType)
class has_base_set (H : Sort v) extends has_base_type H := (base_set : Π S : H, BaseSet (has_base_type.base_type S))
def lean_type_of {H : Sort v} [h : has_base_type H] (S : H) := (has_base_type.base_type S).α
def lean_set_of {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] (S : H) := (has_base_set.base_set S).lean_set
-- The coercions do not seem to work within definitions, even with `↑`. Need to figure out why.
-- However, they seem to be used implicitly in proofs, as can be seen by commenting them out.
structure Set := (base_type : BaseType) (base_set : BaseSet base_type)
instance Set_has_base_type : has_base_type Set := ⟨Set.base_type⟩
instance Set_has_base_set : has_base_set Set := ⟨Set.base_set⟩
def make_set (base_type : BaseType) (base_set : BaseSet base_type) := Set.mk base_type base_set
def lean_type_to_set (α : Type u) := Set.mk (lean_type_to_base_type α) universal_base_set
instance Lean_Type_to_Set : has_coe (Type u) Set := ⟨lean_type_to_set⟩
def lean_type_to_set_with_equality (α : Type u) (equality : α → α → Prop) (is_equivalence : equivalence equality) := Set.mk (make_base_type α equality is_equivalence) universal_base_set
def lean_setoid_to_set (α : Type u) [h : setoid α] := Set.mk (BaseType.mk α h) universal_base_set
def lean_set_to_set {α : Type u} (lean_set : set α) := Set.mk (lean_type_to_base_type α) (lean_set_to_base_set lean_set)
instance Lean_Set_to_Set {α : Type u} : has_coe (set α) Set := ⟨lean_set_to_set⟩
structure Subset {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] (S : H) := (base_set : BaseSet (has_base_type.base_type S)) (is_subset : base_set.lean_set ⊆ lean_set_of S)
instance Subset_has_base_type {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} : has_base_type (Subset S) := ⟨λ _, has_base_type.base_type S⟩
instance Subset_has_base_set {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} : has_base_set (Subset S) := ⟨Subset.base_set⟩
def make_subset {H : Sort v} [h : has_base_set H] (S : H) (lean_set : set (lean_type_of S)) (is_subset : lean_set ⊆ lean_set_of S) (respects_equality : lean_set_respects_equality (has_base_type.base_type S) lean_set) : Subset S := @Subset.mk H h S (BaseSet.mk lean_set respects_equality) is_subset
def subset_to_set {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (T : Subset S) := make_set (has_base_type.base_type S) T.base_set
instance Subset_to_Set {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} : has_coe (Subset S) Set := ⟨subset_to_set⟩
def subset_to_superset {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} {S' : Subset S} (T : Subset S') : Subset S := Subset.mk T.base_set (λ _ h, S'.is_subset (T.is_subset h))
instance Subset_to_Superset {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} {S' : Subset S} : has_coe (Subset S') (Subset S) := ⟨subset_to_superset⟩
def set_to_subset (S : Set) : Subset S := Subset.mk S.base_set (λ _, id)
def Element {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] (S : H) := BaseElement (has_base_set.base_set S)
instance Element_has_base_type {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} : has_base_type (Element S) := ⟨λ _, has_base_type.base_type S⟩
instance Element_is_setoid {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} : setoid (Element S) := setoid.mk (λ x y, equals x y) ⟨refl, λ _ _, symm, λ _ _ _, trans⟩
def make_element {H : Sort v} [h : has_base_set H] (S : H) (element : lean_type_of S) (is_element : element ∈ lean_set_of S) : Element S := make_base_element (has_base_set.base_set S) element is_element
instance Lean_Object_to_Element {α : Type u} : has_coe α (Element (lean_type_to_set α)) := ⟨λ x, make_element _ x trivial⟩
def eliminate_subset_to_set {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} {T : Subset S} (x : Element (subset_to_set T)) :=
make_element T x.element x.is_element
instance Eliminate_subset_to_set {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} {T : Subset S} : has_coe (Element (subset_to_set T)) (Element T) := ⟨eliminate_subset_to_set⟩
def superset_element {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] (S : H) {T : Subset S} (x : Element T) :=
make_element S x.element (T.is_subset x.is_element)
instance Superset_element {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} {T : Subset S} : has_coe (Element T) (Element S) := ⟨superset_element S⟩
def is_element {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} {x_base_set : BaseSet (has_base_type.base_type S)} (x : BaseElement x_base_set) (T : Subset S) :=
x.element ∈ T.base_set.lean_set
instance {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} : has_mem (Element S) (Subset S) :=
⟨is_element⟩
def is_subset {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (X Y : Subset S) :=
∀ s : Element S, s ∈ X → s ∈ Y
instance {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} : has_subset (Subset S) :=
⟨is_subset⟩
@[refl] lemma is_subset_refl {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (X : Subset S) : is_subset X X := λ _, id
@[trans] lemma is_subset_trans {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} {X Y Z : Subset S} (h1 : is_subset X Y) (h2 : is_subset Y Z) : is_subset X Z := λ s h3, h2 s (h1 s h3)
def set_equals {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (X Y : Subset S) :=
X ⊆ Y ∧ Y ⊆ X
instance Subset_is_setoid {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} : setoid (Subset S) :=
setoid.mk set_equals ⟨(λ X, ⟨is_subset_refl X, is_subset_refl X⟩), (λ X Y h, ⟨h.right, h.left⟩), (λ X Y Z h1 h2, ⟨is_subset_trans h1.left h2.left, is_subset_trans h2.right h1.right⟩)⟩
theorem is_element_respects_equality_x {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (x1 x2 : Element S) (h : x1 ≈ x2) (T : Subset S) :
x1 ∈ T → x2 ∈ T :=
T.base_set.respects_equality x1.element x2.element h
theorem is_element_respects_equality_T {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (x : Element S) (T1 T2 : Subset S) (h : T1 ≈ T2) :
x ∈ T1 → x ∈ T2 :=
h.left x
theorem is_subset_respects_equality_X {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (X1 X2 : Subset S) (h : X1 ≈ X2) (Y : Subset S) :
X1 ⊆ Y → X2 ⊆ Y :=
λ h1 x h2, h1 x (h.right x h2)
theorem is_subset_respects_equality_Y {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (X : Subset S) (Y1 Y2 : Subset S) (h : Y1 ≈ Y2) :
X ⊆ Y1 → X ⊆ Y2 :=
λ h1 x h2, h.left x (h1 x h2)
def subset {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (s : set (Element S)) (s_respects_equality : ∀ x y : Element S, x ≈ y → x ∈ s → y ∈ s) : Subset S :=
let lean_set := {x : lean_type_of S | and_dep (λ p : x ∈ lean_set_of S, (make_element S x p) ∈ s)} in
make_subset S lean_set (λ _, and_dep_left) (λ x_base y_base,
assume h1 h2,
let h3 := and_dep_left h2 in
let h4 := and_dep_right h2 in
⟨(has_base_set.base_set S).respects_equality x_base y_base h1 h3,
(assume h5,
let x := make_element S x_base h3 in
let y := make_element S y_base h5 in
s_respects_equality x y h1 h4)⟩
)
lemma trivially_respects_equality {α : Type u} {s : set (Element (lean_type_to_set α))} (x y : Element (lean_type_to_set α)) (h : x ≈ y) :
x ∈ s → y ∈ s := begin
intro h1,
cases x with x_base _, cases y with y_base _,
have h2 : x_base = y_base, from h,
rewrite ← h2,
exact h1
end
def exists_unique_element {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (p : Element S → Prop) :=
∃ x : Element S, p x ∧ ∀ y : Element S, p y → y ≈ x
structure unique_element_desc {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] (S : H) :=
(p : Element S → Prop) (h : exists_unique_element p)
noncomputable def unique_element {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (desc : unique_element_desc S) :=
classical.some desc.h
theorem unique_element_spec {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (desc : unique_element_desc S) :
desc.p (unique_element desc) :=
(classical.some_spec desc.h).left
theorem unique_element_equality {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (desc : unique_element_desc S) :
∀ y : Element S, desc.p y → y ≈ (unique_element desc) :=
(classical.some_spec desc.h).right
theorem unique_elements_equality {H : Sort v} [has_base_set H] {S : H} (desc : unique_element_desc S) :
∀ x y : Element S, desc.p x → desc.p y → x ≈ y := begin
intros x y h1 h2,
transitivity unique_element desc,
exact unique_element_equality desc x h1,
symmetry, exact unique_element_equality desc y h2
end
class has_embedding (S : Set) (T : Set) :=
(f : Element S → Element T) (is_well_defined : ∀ x y : Element S, x ≈ y ↔ f x ≈ f y)
instance embed (S : Set) (T : Set) [h : has_embedding S T] : has_coe (Element S) (Element T) := ⟨h.f⟩
end hlm
-- Examples
open hlm
def Intersection (U : Set) (S T : Subset U) :=
subset {x : Element U | x ∈ S ∧ x ∈ T} (begin
intros x y h1 h2,
split,
exact is_element_respects_equality_x x y h1 S h2.left,
exact is_element_respects_equality_x x y h1 T h2.right
end)
theorem Intersection_respects_equality_S (U : Set) (S1 S2 : Subset U) (h : S1 ≈ S2) (T : Subset U) :
Intersection U S1 T ⊆ Intersection U S2 T := begin
intros x h1,
split,
{ exact x.is_element },
{ intro,
split,
{ apply is_element_respects_equality_T x S1 S2 h,
exact (and_dep_right h1).left },
{ exact (and_dep_right h1).right } }
end
theorem Intersection_respects_equality_T (U : Set) (S : Subset U) (T1 T2 : Subset U) (h : T1 ≈ T2) :
Intersection U S T1 ⊆ Intersection U S T2 := begin
intros x h1,
split,
{ exact x.is_element },
{ intro,
split,
{ exact (and_dep_right h1).left },
{ apply is_element_respects_equality_T x T1 T2 h,
exact (and_dep_right h1).right } }
end
def Natural_numbers :=
lean_type_to_set ℕ
def Natural_numbers_zero :=
make_element Natural_numbers nat.zero trivial
def Natural_numbers_sum (m n : Element Natural_numbers) :=
make_element Natural_numbers (nat.add m.element n.element) trivial
theorem Natural_numbers_sum_respects_equality_m (m1 m2 : Element Natural_numbers) (h : m1 ≈ m2) (n : Element Natural_numbers) :
Natural_numbers_sum m1 n ≈ Natural_numbers_sum m2 n := begin
have h1 : m1.element = m2.element, from h,
unfold Natural_numbers_sum,
rewrite h1
end
theorem Natural_numbers_sum_respects_equality_n (m n1 n2 : Element Natural_numbers) (h : n1 ≈ n2) :
Natural_numbers_sum m n1 ≈ Natural_numbers_sum m n2 := begin
have h1 : n1.element = n2.element, from h,
unfold Natural_numbers_sum,
rewrite h1
end
theorem Natural_numbers_sum_associative (k m n : Element Natural_numbers) :
Natural_numbers_sum (Natural_numbers_sum k m) n ≈ Natural_numbers_sum k (Natural_numbers_sum m n) :=
nat.add_assoc k.element m.element n.element
theorem Natural_numbers_sum_commutative (m n : Element Natural_numbers) :
Natural_numbers_sum m n ≈ Natural_numbers_sum n m :=
nat.add_comm m.element n.element
theorem Natural_numbers_sum_right_cancel (k m n : Element Natural_numbers) :
Natural_numbers_sum k n ≈ Natural_numbers_sum m n → k ≈ m :=
nat.add_right_cancel
def Natural_numbers_less (m n : Element Natural_numbers) :=
nat.lt m.element n.element
def Initial_segment (n : Element Natural_numbers) :=
subset {m : Element Natural_numbers | Natural_numbers_less m n} trivially_respects_equality
def Functions (X Y : Set) :=
let base_type := make_base_type (Element X → Element Y) (λ f g : Element X → Element Y, ∀ x : Element X, f x ≈ g x) (begin
split,
{ intros f x,
reflexivity },
split,
{ intros f g h1 x,
symmetry, exact h1 x },
{ intros f g h h1 h2 x,
transitivity (g x),
exact h1 x,
exact h2 x }
end) in
let base_set := make_base_set base_type {f : Element X → Element Y | ∀ x y : Element X, x ≈ y → f x ≈ f y} (begin
intros f g h1 h2 x y h3,
transitivity (f x),
symmetry, exact h1 x,
transitivity (f y),
exact h2 x y h3,
exact h1 y
end) in
make_set base_type base_set
def value {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) (x : Element X) :=
f.element x
theorem value_respects_equality_f {X Y : Set} (f1 f2 : Element (Functions X Y)) (h : f1 ≈ f2) (x : Element X)
: value f1 x ≈ value f2 x :=
h x
theorem value_respects_equality_x {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) (x1 x2 : Element X) (h : x1 ≈ x2)
: value f x1 ≈ value f x2 :=
f.is_element x1 x2 h
def identity (X : Set) :=
make_element (Functions X X) id (λ x y, id)
def composition {X Y Z : Set} (g : Element (Functions Y Z)) (f : Element (Functions X Y)) :=
make_element (Functions X Z) (λ x : Element X, value g (value f x)) (begin
intros x y h1,
let h2 := value_respects_equality_x f x y h1,
exact value_respects_equality_x g (value f x) (value f y) h2
end)
theorem composition_respects_equality_g {X Y Z : Set} (g1 g2 : Element (Functions Y Z)) (h : g1 ≈ g2) (f : Element (Functions X Y)) :
composition g1 f ≈ composition g2 f := begin
intro x,
apply value_respects_equality_f g1 g2 h (value f x)
end
theorem composition_respects_equality_f {X Y Z : Set} (g : Element (Functions Y Z)) (f1 f2 : Element (Functions X Y)) (h : f1 ≈ f2) :
composition g f1 ≈ composition g f2 := begin
intro x,
let h1 := value_respects_equality_f f1 f2 h x,
exact value_respects_equality_x g (value f1 x) (value f2 x) h1
end
def Image {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) (S : Subset X) :=
subset {y : Element Y | ∃ x : Element X, value f x ≈ y} (begin
intros y1 y2 h1 h2,
cases h2 with x h3,
existsi x,
transitivity y1,
exact h3,
exact h1
end)
def injective {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) :=
∀ (x y : Element X) (h : value f x ≈ value f y), x ≈ y
theorem injective_respects_equality_f {X Y : Set} (f1 f2 : Element (Functions X Y)) (h : f1 ≈ f2)
: injective f1 → injective f2 := begin
intros h1 x y h2,
apply h1 x y,
transitivity value f2 x,
exact value_respects_equality_f f1 f2 h x,
transitivity value f2 y,
exact h2,
symmetry, exact value_respects_equality_f f1 f2 h y
end
def surjective {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) :=
∀ y : Element Y, ∃ x : Element X, value f x ≈ y
theorem surjective_respects_equality_f {X Y : Set} (f1 f2 : Element (Functions X Y)) (h : f1 ≈ f2)
: surjective f1 → surjective f2 := begin
intros h1 y,
cases h1 y with x h2,
existsi x,
transitivity value f1 x,
symmetry, exact value_respects_equality_f f1 f2 h x,
exact h2
end
def bijective {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) :=
injective f ∧ surjective f
theorem bijective_respects_equality_f {X Y : Set} (f1 f2 : Element (Functions X Y)) (h : f1 ≈ f2)
: bijective f1 → bijective f2 := begin
intro h1,
split,
exact injective_respects_equality_f f1 f2 h h1.left,
exact surjective_respects_equality_f f1 f2 h h1.right
end
def Bijections (X Y : Set) :=
subset {f : Element (Functions X Y) | bijective f} (begin
intros f g h1 h2,
exact bijective_respects_equality_f f g h1 h2
end)
def preimage_desc {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) (h1 : bijective f) (y : Element Y) :=
let is_preimage (x : Element X) := value f x ≈ y in
unique_element_desc.mk is_preimage (begin
cases (h1.right y) with x h2,
existsi x,
split,
{ exact h2 },
{ intros z h3,
apply h1.left z x,
symmetry,
transitivity y,
exact h2,
symmetry, exact h3 }
end)
noncomputable def preimage {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) (h1 : bijective f) (y : Element Y) :=
unique_element (preimage_desc f h1 y)
def inverse_desc {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Bijections X Y)) :=
let is_inverse (g : Element (Bijections Y X)) := composition (superset_element (Functions Y X) g) (superset_element (Functions X Y) f) ≈ identity X in
unique_element_desc.mk is_inverse (begin
let f_is_bijective := and_dep_right f.is_element,
let f_is_injective := f_is_bijective.left,
let f_is_surjective := f_is_bijective.right,
let g_base := preimage ↑f f_is_bijective,
let g := make_element (Bijections Y X) g_base (begin
split,
{ intros y1 y2 h1,
let x1 := g_base y1,
apply unique_element_equality (preimage_desc ↑f f_is_bijective y2) x1,
show f.element x1 ≈ y2,
transitivity y1,
exact unique_element_spec (preimage_desc ↑f f_is_bijective y1),
exact h1 },
{ intro,
split,
{ intros y1 y2 h1,
let x1 := g_base y1,
let x2 := g_base y2,
transitivity f.element x1,
symmetry,
exact unique_element_spec (preimage_desc ↑f f_is_bijective y1),
transitivity f.element x2,
exact value_respects_equality_x (superset_element (Functions X Y) f) x1 x2 h1,
exact unique_element_spec (preimage_desc ↑f f_is_bijective y2) },
{ intro x,
let y := f.element x,
existsi y,
let z := g_base y,
apply f_is_injective z x,
exact unique_element_spec (preimage_desc ↑f f_is_bijective y) } }
end),
existsi g,
split,
{ intro x,
let y := f.element x,
symmetry,
apply unique_element_equality (preimage_desc ↑f f_is_bijective y) x,
show y ≈ y, reflexivity },
{ intros h h1 y,
let h2 := h1 (g.element y),
let fgy := f.element (g.element y),
have h3 : fgy ≈ y, from unique_element_spec (preimage_desc ↑f f_is_bijective y),
transitivity h.element fgy,
symmetry, exact value_respects_equality_x (superset_element (Functions Y X) h) fgy y h3,
exact h2 }
end)
noncomputable def inverse {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Bijections X Y)) :=
unique_element (inverse_desc f)
def restriction {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) (T : Subset X) :=
make_element (Functions (subset_to_set T) Y) (λ t : Element (subset_to_set T), value f (superset_element X (eliminate_subset_to_set t))) (begin
intros x y,
exact f.is_element x y
end)
theorem Restriction_preserves_injectivity {X Y : Set} (f : Element (Functions X Y)) (h1 : injective f) (T : Subset X) :
injective (restriction f T) := begin
intros x y,
exact h1 x y
end
def finite (S : Set) :=
∃ (n : Element Natural_numbers) (f : Element (Functions S (subset_to_set (Initial_segment n)))), injective f
theorem Subsets_of_finite_sets_are_finite (S : Set) (h1 : finite S) (T : Subset S) :
finite (subset_to_set T) := begin
cases h1 with n h2,
cases h2 with f h3,
existsi [n, (restriction f T)],
exact Restriction_preserves_injectivity f h3 T
end
def Cardinal_numbers :=
lean_type_to_set_with_equality Set (λ S T : Set, ∃ f : Element (Bijections S T), true) (begin
split,
{ intro S,
let id := identity S,
let id_bijection := make_element (Bijections S S) id.element ⟨id.is_element, (begin
intro,
split,
{ intros x y h1,
exact h1 },
{ intro y,
existsi y,
reflexivity }
end)⟩,
existsi id_bijection,
trivial },
split,
{ intros S T h1,
cases h1 with f _,
existsi inverse f,
trivial },
{ intros S T U h1 h2,
cases h1 with f _,
cases h2 with g _,
let comp := composition (superset_element (Functions T U) g) (superset_element (Functions S T) f),
let comp_bijection := make_element (Bijections S U) comp.element (begin
let f_is_bijective := and_dep_right f.is_element,
let g_is_bijective := and_dep_right g.is_element,
split,
{ exact comp.is_element },
{ intro,
split,
{ intros x y h1,
apply f_is_bijective.left,
apply g_is_bijective.left,
exact h1 },
{ intro z,
cases (g_is_bijective.right z) with y h1,
cases (f_is_bijective.right y) with x h2,
existsi x,
let h3 := (and_dep_left g.is_element) (f.element x) y h2,
transitivity g.element y,
exact h3,
exact h1 } }
end),
existsi comp_bijection,
trivial }
end)
def Carrier (k : Element Cardinal_numbers) :=
k.element
def Homomorphisms (k l : Element Cardinal_numbers) :=
Functions (Carrier k) (Carrier l)
|
d2b0e436a8e9f0b478be4457ecafbea6313fc6d1 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/linear_algebra/exterior_algebra/of_alternating.lean | 2ad764e901130c0ba9490b93b79cdb238e76a6d6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,206 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.fold
import linear_algebra.exterior_algebra.basic
/-!
# Extending an alternating map to the exterior algebra
## Main definitions
* `exterior_algebra.lift_alternating`: construct a linear map out of the exterior algebra
given alternating maps (corresponding to maps out of the exterior powers).
* `exterior_algebra.lift_alternating_equiv`: the above as a linear equivalence
## Main results
* `exterior_algebra.lhom_ext`: linear maps from the exterior algebra agree if they agree on the
exterior powers.
-/
variables {R M N N' : Type*}
variables [comm_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group N] [add_comm_group N']
variables [module R M] [module R N] [module R N']
-- This instance can't be found where it's needed if we don't remind lean that it exists.
instance alternating_map.module_add_comm_group {ι : Type*} [decidable_eq ι] :
module R (alternating_map R M N ι) :=
by apply_instance
namespace exterior_algebra
open clifford_algebra (hiding ι)
/-- Build a map out of the exterior algebra given a collection of alternating maps acting on each
exterior power -/
def lift_alternating : (Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)) →ₗ[R] exterior_algebra R M →ₗ[R] N :=
begin
suffices :
(Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i))
→ₗ[R] exterior_algebra R M
→ₗ[R] (Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)),
{ refine linear_map.compr₂ this _,
refine linear_equiv.to_linear_map _ ∘ₗ linear_map.proj 0,
exact alternating_map.const_linear_equiv_of_is_empty.symm },
refine clifford_algebra.foldl _ _ _,
{ refine linear_map.mk₂ R
(λ m f i, (f i.succ).curry_left m) (λ m₁ m₂ f, _) (λ c m f, _) (λ m f₁ f₂, _) (λ c m f, _),
all_goals {
ext i : 1,
simp only [map_smul, map_add, pi.add_apply, pi.smul_apply, alternating_map.curry_left_add,
alternating_map.curry_left_smul, map_add, map_smul, linear_map.add_apply,
linear_map.smul_apply] } },
{ -- when applied twice with the same `m`, this recursive step produces 0
intros m x,
dsimp only [linear_map.mk₂_apply, quadratic_form.coe_fn_zero, pi.zero_apply],
simp_rw zero_smul,
ext i : 1,
exact alternating_map.curry_left_same _ _, }
end
@[simp]
lemma lift_alternating_ι (f : Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)) (m : M) :
lift_alternating f (ι R m) = f 1 ![m] :=
begin
dsimp [lift_alternating],
rw [foldl_ι, linear_map.mk₂_apply, alternating_map.curry_left_apply_apply],
congr,
end
lemma lift_alternating_ι_mul (f : Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)) (m : M)
(x : exterior_algebra R M):
lift_alternating f (ι R m * x) = lift_alternating (λ i, (f i.succ).curry_left m) x :=
begin
dsimp [lift_alternating],
rw [foldl_mul, foldl_ι],
refl,
end
@[simp]
lemma lift_alternating_one (f : Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)) :
lift_alternating f (1 : exterior_algebra R M) = f 0 0 :=
begin
dsimp [lift_alternating],
rw foldl_one,
end
@[simp]
lemma lift_alternating_algebra_map (f : Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)) (r : R) :
lift_alternating f (algebra_map _ (exterior_algebra R M) r) = r • f 0 0 :=
by rw [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, map_smul, lift_alternating_one]
@[simp]
lemma lift_alternating_apply_ι_multi {n : ℕ} (f : Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i))
(v : fin n → M) :
lift_alternating f (ι_multi R n v) = f n v :=
begin
rw ι_multi_apply,
induction n with n ih generalizing f v,
{ rw [list.of_fn_zero, list.prod_nil, lift_alternating_one, subsingleton.elim 0 v] },
{ rw [list.of_fn_succ, list.prod_cons, lift_alternating_ι_mul, ih,
alternating_map.curry_left_apply_apply],
congr',
exact matrix.cons_head_tail _ }
end
@[simp]
lemma lift_alternating_comp_ι_multi {n : ℕ} (f : Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)) :
(lift_alternating f).comp_alternating_map (ι_multi R n) = f n :=
alternating_map.ext $ lift_alternating_apply_ι_multi f
@[simp]
lemma lift_alternating_comp (g : N →ₗ[R] N') (f : Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)) :
lift_alternating (λ i, g.comp_alternating_map (f i)) = g ∘ₗ lift_alternating f :=
begin
ext v,
rw linear_map.comp_apply,
induction v using clifford_algebra.left_induction with r x y hx hy x m hx generalizing f,
{ rw [lift_alternating_algebra_map, lift_alternating_algebra_map, map_smul,
linear_map.comp_alternating_map_apply] },
{ rw [map_add, map_add, map_add, hx, hy] },
{ rw [lift_alternating_ι_mul, lift_alternating_ι_mul, ←hx],
simp_rw alternating_map.curry_left_comp_alternating_map },
end
@[simp]
lemma lift_alternating_ι_multi :
lift_alternating (by exact (ι_multi R)) =
(linear_map.id : exterior_algebra R M →ₗ[R] exterior_algebra R M) :=
begin
ext v,
dsimp,
induction v using clifford_algebra.left_induction with r x y hx hy x m hx,
{ rw [lift_alternating_algebra_map, ι_multi_zero_apply, algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one] },
{ rw [map_add, hx, hy] },
{ simp_rw [lift_alternating_ι_mul, ι_multi_succ_curry_left, lift_alternating_comp,
linear_map.comp_apply, linear_map.mul_left_apply, hx] },
end
/-- `exterior_algebra.lift_alternating` is an equivalence. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def lift_alternating_equiv :
(Π i, alternating_map R M N (fin i)) ≃ₗ[R] exterior_algebra R M →ₗ[R] N :=
{ to_fun := lift_alternating,
map_add' := map_add _,
map_smul' := map_smul _,
inv_fun := λ F i, F.comp_alternating_map (ι_multi R i),
left_inv := λ f, funext $ λ i, lift_alternating_comp_ι_multi _,
right_inv := λ F, (lift_alternating_comp _ _).trans $
by rw [lift_alternating_ι_multi, linear_map.comp_id]}
/-- To show that two linear maps from the exterior algebra agree, it suffices to show they agree on
the exterior powers.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas] -/
@[ext]
lemma lhom_ext ⦃f g : exterior_algebra R M →ₗ[R] N⦄
(h : ∀ i, f.comp_alternating_map (ι_multi R i) = g.comp_alternating_map (ι_multi R i)) : f = g :=
lift_alternating_equiv.symm.injective $ funext h
end exterior_algebra
|
bac05f7084a0cd6894b23caba24e4936b4f3b95c | 5ae26df177f810c5006841e9c73dc56e01b978d7 | /src/category/bitraversable/instances.lean | 8ddf29dae0a700f4bf407df38fac5e523fb524a3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/mathlib | 98322577c460bc6b1fe5c21f42ce33ad1c3e5558 | a2a867e827c2a6702beb9efc2b9282bd801d5f9a | refs/heads/master | 1,583,848,251,477 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 129,409,993 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,565,164,817,000 | 1,523,628,059,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,007 | lean | import category.bitraversable.basic
category.bitraversable.lemmas
category.traversable.lemmas
tactic.solve_by_elim
universes u v w
variables {t : Type u → Type u → Type u} [bitraversable t]
section
variables {F : Type u → Type u} [applicative F]
def prod.bitraverse {α α' β β'} (f : α → F α') (f' : β → F β') : α × β → F (α' × β')
| (x,y) := prod.mk <$> f x <*> f' y
instance : bitraversable prod :=
{ bitraverse := @prod.bitraverse }
instance : is_lawful_bitraversable prod :=
by constructor; introsI; cases x;
simp [bitraverse,prod.bitraverse] with functor_norm; refl
open functor
def sum.bitraverse {α α' β β'} (f : α → F α') (f' : β → F β') : α ⊕ β → F (α' ⊕ β')
| (sum.inl x) := sum.inl <$> f x
| (sum.inr x) := sum.inr <$> f' x
instance : bitraversable sum :=
{ bitraverse := @sum.bitraverse }
instance : is_lawful_bitraversable sum :=
by constructor; introsI; cases x;
simp [bitraverse,sum.bitraverse] with functor_norm; refl
def const.bitraverse {α α' β β'} (f : α → F α') (f' : β → F β') : const α β → F (const α' β') := f
instance bitraversable.const : bitraversable const :=
{ bitraverse := @const.bitraverse }
instance is_lawful_bitraversable.const : is_lawful_bitraversable const :=
by constructor; introsI;
simp [bitraverse,const.bitraverse] with functor_norm; refl
def flip.bitraverse {α α' β β'} (f : α → F α') (f' : β → F β') : flip t α β → F (flip t α' β') :=
(bitraverse f' f : t β α → F (t β' α'))
instance bitraversable.flip : bitraversable (flip t) :=
{ bitraverse := @flip.bitraverse t _ }
variables [is_lawful_bitraversable t]
open is_lawful_bitraversable
instance is_lawful_bitraversable.flip : is_lawful_bitraversable (flip t) :=
by constructor; introsI; casesm is_lawful_bitraversable t; apply_assumption
open bitraversable functor
@[priority 0]
instance bitraversable.traversable {α} : traversable (t α) :=
{ traverse := @tsnd t _ _ }
@[priority 0]
instance bitraversable.is_lawful_traversable [is_lawful_bitraversable t] {α} :
is_lawful_traversable (t α) :=
by { constructor; introsI; simp [traverse,comp_tsnd] with functor_norm,
{ refl },
{ simp [tsnd_eq_snd_id], refl },
{ simp [tsnd,binaturality,function.comp] with functor_norm } }
end
open bifunctor traversable is_lawful_traversable is_lawful_bitraversable
open function (bicompl bicompr)
section bicompl
variables (F G : Type u → Type u) [traversable F] [traversable G]
def bicompl.bitraverse {m} [applicative m] {α β α' β'} (f : α → m β) (f' : α' → m β') :
bicompl t F G α α' → m (bicompl t F G β β') :=
(bitraverse (traverse f) (traverse f') : t (F α) (G α') → m _)
instance : bitraversable (bicompl t F G) :=
{ bitraverse := @bicompl.bitraverse t _ F G _ _ }
instance [is_lawful_traversable F] [is_lawful_traversable G] [is_lawful_bitraversable t] :
is_lawful_bitraversable (bicompl t F G) :=
begin
constructor; introsI;
simp [bitraverse,bicompl.bitraverse,bimap,traverse_id,bitraverse_id_id,comp_bitraverse] with functor_norm,
{ simp [traverse_eq_map_id',bitraverse_eq_bimap_id], },
{ revert x, dunfold bicompl,
simp [binaturality,naturality_pf] }
end
end bicompl
section bicompr
variables (F : Type u → Type u) [traversable F]
def bicompr.bitraverse {m} [applicative m] {α β α' β'} (f : α → m β) (f' : α' → m β') :
bicompr F t α α' → m (bicompr F t β β') :=
(traverse (bitraverse f f') : F (t α α') → m _)
instance : bitraversable (bicompr F t) :=
{ bitraverse := @bicompr.bitraverse t _ F _ }
instance [is_lawful_traversable F] [is_lawful_bitraversable t] :
is_lawful_bitraversable (bicompr F t) :=
begin
constructor; introsI;
simp [bitraverse,bicompr.bitraverse,bitraverse_id_id] with functor_norm,
{ simp [bitraverse_eq_bimap_id',traverse_eq_map_id'], refl },
{ revert x, dunfold bicompr, intro,
simp [naturality,binaturality'] }
end
end bicompr
|
5ef1cfd112bedc97a1ca658e02f610f7f458a61c | b561a44b48979a98df50ade0789a21c79ee31288 | /src/Init/Notation.lean | 8c425b3c8f59bd3f7272c985a9da953d0c1c02f6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | 3401ijk/lean4 | 97659c475ebd33a034fed515cb83a85f75ccfb06 | a5b1b8de4f4b038ff752b9e607b721f15a9a4351 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,933,007,651 | 1,636,424,845,000 | 1,636,424,845,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,467 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
Notation for operators defined at Prelude.lean
-/
prelude
import Init.Prelude
-- DSL for specifying parser precedences and priorities
namespace Lean.Parser.Syntax
syntax:65 (name := addPrec) prec " + " prec:66 : prec
syntax:65 (name := subPrec) prec " - " prec:66 : prec
syntax:65 (name := addPrio) prio " + " prio:66 : prio
syntax:65 (name := subPrio) prio " - " prio:66 : prio
end Lean.Parser.Syntax
macro "max" : prec => `(1024) -- maximum precedence used in term parsers, in particular for terms in function position (`ident`, `paren`, ...)
macro "arg" : prec => `(1023) -- precedence used for application arguments (`do`, `by`, ...)
macro "lead" : prec => `(1022) -- precedence used for terms not supposed to be used as arguments (`let`, `have`, ...)
macro "(" p:prec ")" : prec => p
macro "min" : prec => `(10) -- minimum precedence used in term parsers
macro "min1" : prec => `(11) -- `(min+1) we can only `min+1` after `Meta.lean`
/-
`max:prec` as a term. It is equivalent to `eval_prec max` for `eval_prec` defined at `Meta.lean`.
We use `max_prec` to workaround bootstrapping issues. -/
macro "max_prec" : term => `(1024)
macro "default" : prio => `(1000)
macro "low" : prio => `(100)
macro "mid" : prio => `(1000)
macro "high" : prio => `(10000)
macro "(" p:prio ")" : prio => p
-- Basic notation for defining parsers
-- NOTE: precedence must be at least `arg` to be used in `macro` without parentheses
syntax:arg stx:max "+" : stx
syntax:arg stx:max "*" : stx
syntax:arg stx:max "?" : stx
syntax:2 stx:2 " <|> " stx:1 : stx
macro_rules
| `(stx| $p +) => `(stx| many1($p))
| `(stx| $p *) => `(stx| many($p))
| `(stx| $p ?) => `(stx| optional($p))
| `(stx| $p₁ <|> $p₂) => `(stx| orelse($p₁, $p₂))
/- Comma-separated sequence. -/
macro:arg x:stx:max ",*" : stx => `(stx| sepBy($x, ",", ", "))
macro:arg x:stx:max ",+" : stx => `(stx| sepBy1($x, ",", ", "))
/- Comma-separated sequence with optional trailing comma. -/
macro:arg x:stx:max ",*,?" : stx => `(stx| sepBy($x, ",", ", ", allowTrailingSep))
macro:arg x:stx:max ",+,?" : stx => `(stx| sepBy1($x, ",", ", ", allowTrailingSep))
macro:arg "!" x:stx:max : stx => `(stx| notFollowedBy($x))
syntax (name := rawNatLit) "nat_lit " num : term
infixr:90 " ∘ " => Function.comp
infixr:35 " × " => Prod
infixl:55 " ||| " => HOr.hOr
infixl:58 " ^^^ " => HXor.hXor
infixl:60 " &&& " => HAnd.hAnd
infixl:65 " + " => HAdd.hAdd
infixl:65 " - " => HSub.hSub
infixl:70 " * " => HMul.hMul
infixl:70 " / " => HDiv.hDiv
infixl:70 " % " => HMod.hMod
infixl:75 " <<< " => HShiftLeft.hShiftLeft
infixl:75 " >>> " => HShiftRight.hShiftRight
infixr:80 " ^ " => HPow.hPow
infixl:65 " ++ " => HAppend.hAppend
prefix:100 "-" => Neg.neg
prefix:100 "~~~" => Complement.complement
/-
Remark: the infix commands above ensure a delaborator is generated for each relations.
We redefine the macros below to be able to use the auxiliary `binop%` elaboration helper for binary operators.
It addresses issue #382. -/
macro_rules | `($x ||| $y) => `(binop% HOr.hOr $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x ^^^ $y) => `(binop% HXor.hXor $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x &&& $y) => `(binop% HAnd.hAnd $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x + $y) => `(binop% HAdd.hAdd $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x - $y) => `(binop% HSub.hSub $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x * $y) => `(binop% HMul.hMul $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x / $y) => `(binop% HDiv.hDiv $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x ++ $y) => `(binop% HAppend.hAppend $x $y)
-- declare ASCII alternatives first so that the latter Unicode unexpander wins
infix:50 " <= " => LE.le
infix:50 " ≤ " => LE.le
infix:50 " < " => LT.lt
infix:50 " >= " => GE.ge
infix:50 " ≥ " => GE.ge
infix:50 " > " => GT.gt
infix:50 " = " => Eq
infix:50 " == " => BEq.beq
/-
Remark: the infix commands above ensure a delaborator is generated for each relations.
We redefine the macros below to be able to use the auxiliary `binrel%` elaboration helper for binary relations.
It has better support for applying coercions. For example, suppose we have `binrel% Eq n i` where `n : Nat` and
`i : Int`. The default elaborator fails because we don't have a coercion from `Int` to `Nat`, but
`binrel%` succeeds because it also tries a coercion from `Nat` to `Int` even when the nat occurs before the int. -/
macro_rules | `($x <= $y) => `(binrel% LE.le $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x ≤ $y) => `(binrel% LE.le $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x < $y) => `(binrel% LT.lt $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x > $y) => `(binrel% GT.gt $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x >= $y) => `(binrel% GE.ge $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x ≥ $y) => `(binrel% GE.ge $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x = $y) => `(binrel% Eq $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x == $y) => `(binrel% BEq.beq $x $y)
infixr:35 " /\\ " => And
infixr:35 " ∧ " => And
infixr:30 " \\/ " => Or
infixr:30 " ∨ " => Or
notation:max "¬" p:40 => Not p
infixl:35 " && " => and
infixl:30 " || " => or
notation:max "!" b:40 => not b
infixr:67 " :: " => List.cons
syntax:20 term:21 " <|> " term:20 : term
syntax:60 term:61 " >> " term:60 : term
infixl:55 " >>= " => Bind.bind
notation:60 a:60 " <*> " b:61 => Seq.seq a fun _ : Unit => b
notation:60 a:60 " <* " b:61 => SeqLeft.seqLeft a fun _ : Unit => b
notation:60 a:60 " *> " b:61 => SeqRight.seqRight a fun _ : Unit => b
infixr:100 " <$> " => Functor.map
macro_rules | `($x <|> $y) => `(binop_lazy% HOrElse.hOrElse $x $y)
macro_rules | `($x >> $y) => `(binop_lazy% HAndThen.hAndThen $x $y)
syntax (name := termDepIfThenElse) ppGroup(ppDedent("if " ident " : " term " then" ppSpace term ppDedent(ppSpace "else") ppSpace term)) : term
macro_rules
| `(if $h:ident : $c then $t:term else $e:term) => `(let_mvar% ?m := $c; wait_if_type_mvar% ?m; dite ?m (fun $h:ident => $t) (fun $h:ident => $e))
syntax (name := termIfThenElse) ppGroup(ppDedent("if " term " then" ppSpace term ppDedent(ppSpace "else") ppSpace term)) : term
macro_rules
| `(if $c then $t:term else $e:term) => `(let_mvar% ?m := $c; wait_if_type_mvar% ?m; ite ?m $t $e)
macro "if " "let " pat:term " := " d:term " then " t:term " else " e:term : term =>
`(match $d:term with | $pat:term => $t | _ => $e)
syntax:min term "<|" term:min : term
macro_rules
| `($f $args* <| $a) => let args := args.push a; `($f $args*)
| `($f <| $a) => `($f $a)
syntax:min term "|>" term:min1 : term
macro_rules
| `($a |> $f $args*) => let args := args.push a; `($f $args*)
| `($a |> $f) => `($f $a)
-- Haskell-like pipe <|
-- Note that we have a whitespace after `$` to avoid an ambiguity with the antiquotations.
syntax:min term atomic("$" ws) term:min : term
macro_rules
| `($f $args* $ $a) => let args := args.push a; `($f $args*)
| `($f $ $a) => `($f $a)
syntax "{ " ident (" : " term)? " // " term " }" : term
macro_rules
| `({ $x : $type // $p }) => ``(Subtype (fun ($x:ident : $type) => $p))
| `({ $x // $p }) => ``(Subtype (fun ($x:ident : _) => $p))
/-
`without_expected_type t` instructs Lean to elaborate `t` without an expected type.
Recall that terms such as `match ... with ...` and `⟨...⟩` will postpone elaboration until
expected type is known. So, `without_expected_type` is not effective in this case. -/
macro "without_expected_type " x:term : term => `(let aux := $x; aux)
syntax "[" term,* "]" : term
syntax "%[" term,* "|" term "]" : term -- auxiliary notation for creating big list literals
namespace Lean
macro_rules
| `([ $elems,* ]) => do
let rec expandListLit (i : Nat) (skip : Bool) (result : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
match i, skip with
| 0, _ => pure result
| i+1, true => expandListLit i false result
| i+1, false => expandListLit i true (← ``(List.cons $(elems.elemsAndSeps[i]) $result))
if elems.elemsAndSeps.size < 64 then
expandListLit elems.elemsAndSeps.size false (← ``(List.nil))
else
`(%[ $elems,* | List.nil ])
notation:50 e:51 " matches " p:51 => match e with | p => true | _ => false
namespace Parser.Tactic
/--
Introduce one or more hypotheses, optionally naming and/or pattern-matching them.
For each hypothesis to be introduced, the remaining main goal's target type must be a `let` or function type.
* `intro` by itself introduces one anonymous hypothesis, which can be accessed by e.g. `assumption`.
* `intro x y` introduces two hypotheses and names them. Individual hypotheses can be anonymized via `_`,
or matched against a pattern:
```lean
-- ... ⊢ α × β → ...
intro (a, b)
-- ..., a : α, b : β ⊢ ...
```
* Alternatively, `intro` can be combined with pattern matching much like `fun`:
```lean
intro
| n + 1, 0 => tac
| ...
```
-/
syntax (name := intro) "intro " notFollowedBy("|") (colGt term:max)* : tactic
/-- `intros x...` behaves like `intro x...`, but then keeps introducing (anonymous) hypotheses until goal is not of a function type. -/
syntax (name := intros) "intros " (colGt (ident <|> "_"))* : tactic
/--
`rename t => x` renames the most recent hypothesis whose type matches `t` (which may contain placeholders) to `x`,
or fails if no such hypothesis could be found. -/
syntax (name := rename) "rename " term " => " ident : tactic
/-- `revert x...` is the inverse of `intro x...`: it moves the given hypotheses into the main goal's target type. -/
syntax (name := revert) "revert " (colGt ident)+ : tactic
/-- `clear x...` removes the given hypotheses, or fails if there are remaining references to a hypothesis. -/
syntax (name := clear) "clear " (colGt ident)+ : tactic
/--
`subst x...` substitutes each `x` with `e` in the goal if there is a hypothesis of type `x = e` or `e = x`.
If `x` is itself a hypothesis of type `y = e` or `e = y`, `y` is substituted instead. -/
syntax (name := subst) "subst " (colGt ident)+ : tactic
/--
`assumption` tries to solve the main goal using a hypothesis of compatible type, or else fails.
Note also the `‹t›` term notation, which is a shorthand for `show t by assumption`. -/
syntax (name := assumption) "assumption" : tactic
/--
`contradiction` closes the main goal if its hypotheses are "trivially contradictory".
```lean
example (h : False) : p := by contradiction -- inductive type/family with no applicable constructors
example (h : none = some true) : p := by contradiction -- injectivity of constructors
example (h : 2 + 2 = 3) : p := by contradiction -- decidable false proposition
example (h : p) (h' : ¬ p) : q := by contradiction
example (x : Nat) (h : x ≠ x) : p := by contradiction
```
-/
syntax (name := contradiction) "contradiction" : tactic
/--
`apply e` tries to match the current goal against the conclusion of `e`'s type.
If it succeeds, then the tactic returns as many subgoals as the number of premises that
have not been fixed by type inference or type class resolution.
Non-dependent premises are added before dependent ones.
The `apply` tactic uses higher-order pattern matching, type class resolution, and first-order unification with dependent types.
-/
syntax (name := apply) "apply " term : tactic
/--
`exact e` closes the main goal if its target type matches that of `e`.
-/
syntax (name := exact) "exact " term : tactic
/--
`refine e` behaves like `exact e`, except that named (`?x`) or unnamed (`?_`) holes in `e` that are not solved
by unification with the main goal's target type are converted into new goals, using the hole's name, if any, as the goal case name.
-/
syntax (name := refine) "refine " term : tactic
/-- `refine' e` behaves like `refine e`, except that unsolved placeholders (`_`) and implicit parameters are also converted into new goals. -/
syntax (name := refine') "refine' " term : tactic
/-- If the main goal's target type is an inductive type, `constructor` solves it with the first matching constructor, or else fails. -/
syntax (name := constructor) "constructor" : tactic
/--
`case tag => tac` focuses on the goal with case name `tag` and solves it using `tac`, or else fails.
`case tag x₁ ... xₙ => tac` additionally renames the `n` most recent hypotheses with inaccessible names to the given names. -/
syntax (name := case) "case " (ident <|> "_") (ident <|> "_")* " => " tacticSeq : tactic
/--
`next => tac` focuses on the next goal solves it using `tac`, or else fails.
`next x₁ ... xₙ => tac` additionally renames the `n` most recent hypotheses with inaccessible names to the given names. -/
macro "next " args:(ident <|> "_")* " => " tac:tacticSeq : tactic => `(tactic| case _ $(args.getArgs)* => $tac)
/-- `allGoals tac` runs `tac` on each goal, concatenating the resulting goals, if any. -/
syntax (name := allGoals) "all_goals " tacticSeq : tactic
/-- `anyGoals tac` applies the tactic `tac` to every goal, and succeeds if at least one application succeeds. -/
syntax (name := anyGoals) "any_goals " tacticSeq : tactic
/--
`focus tac` focuses on the main goal, suppressing all other goals, and runs `tac` on it.
Usually `· tac`, which enforces that the goal is closed by `tac`, should be preferred. -/
syntax (name := focus) "focus " tacticSeq : tactic
/-- `skip` does nothing. -/
syntax (name := skip) "skip" : tactic
/-- `done` succeeds iff there are no remaining goals. -/
syntax (name := done) "done" : tactic
syntax (name := traceState) "trace_state" : tactic
syntax (name := failIfSuccess) "fail_if_success " tacticSeq : tactic
syntax (name := paren) "(" tacticSeq ")" : tactic
syntax (name := withReducible) "with_reducible " tacticSeq : tactic
syntax (name := withReducibleAndInstances) "with_reducible_and_instances " tacticSeq : tactic
/-- `first | tac | ...` runs each `tac` until one succeeds, or else fails. -/
syntax (name := first) "first " withPosition((group(colGe "|" tacticSeq))+) : tactic
syntax (name := rotateLeft) "rotate_left" (num)? : tactic
syntax (name := rotateRight) "rotate_right" (num)? : tactic
/-- `try tac` runs `tac` and succeeds even if `tac` failed. -/
macro "try " t:tacticSeq : tactic => `(first | $t | skip)
/-- `tac <;> tac'` runs `tac` on the main goal and `tac'` on each produced goal, concatenating all goals produced by `tac'`. -/
macro:1 x:tactic " <;> " y:tactic:0 : tactic => `(tactic| focus ($x:tactic; all_goals $y:tactic))
/-- `· tac` focuses on the main goal and tries to solve it using `tac`, or else fails. -/
macro dot:("·" <|> ".") ts:tacticSeq : tactic => `(tactic| {%$dot ($ts:tacticSeq) })
/-- `rfl` is a shorthand for `exact rfl`. -/
macro "rfl" : tactic => `(exact rfl)
/-- `admit` is a shorthand for `exact sorry`. -/
macro "admit" : tactic => `(exact sorry)
/-- The `sorry` tactic isnxo a shorthand for `exact sorry`. -/
macro "sorry" : tactic => `(exact sorry)
macro "infer_instance" : tactic => `(exact inferInstance)
/-- Optional configuration option for tactics -/
syntax config := atomic("(" &"config") " := " term ")"
syntax locationWildcard := "*"
syntax locationHyp := (colGt ident)+ ("⊢" <|> "|-")? -- TODO: delete
syntax locationTargets := (colGt ident)+ ("⊢" <|> "|-")?
syntax location := withPosition(" at " (locationWildcard <|> locationHyp))
syntax (name := change) "change " term (location)? : tactic
syntax (name := changeWith) "change " term " with " term (location)? : tactic
syntax rwRule := ("←" <|> "<-")? term
syntax rwRuleSeq := "[" rwRule,+,? "]"
syntax (name := rewriteSeq) "rewrite " (config)? rwRuleSeq (location)? : tactic
syntax (name := rwSeq) "rw " (config)? rwRuleSeq (location)? : tactic
def rwWithRfl (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (atom : String) (stx : Syntax) : MacroM Syntax := do
-- We show the `rfl` state on `]`
let seq := stx[2]
let rbrak := seq[2]
-- Replace `]` token with one without position information in the expanded tactic
let seq := seq.setArg 2 (mkAtom "]")
let tac := stx.setKind kind |>.setArg 0 (mkAtomFrom stx atom) |>.setArg 2 seq
`(tactic| $tac; try (with_reducible rfl%$rbrak))
@[macro rwSeq] def expandRwSeq : Macro :=
rwWithRfl ``Lean.Parser.Tactic.rewriteSeq "rewrite"
syntax (name := injection) "injection " term (" with " (colGt (ident <|> "_"))+)? : tactic
syntax (name := injections) "injections" : tactic
syntax discharger := atomic("(" (&"discharger" <|> &"disch")) " := " tacticSeq ")"
syntax simpPre := "↓"
syntax simpPost := "↑"
syntax simpLemma := (simpPre <|> simpPost)? ("←" <|> "<-")? term
syntax simpErase := "-" ident
syntax simpStar := "*"
syntax (name := simp) "simp " (config)? (discharger)? (&"only ")? ("[" (simpStar <|> simpErase <|> simpLemma),* "]")? (location)? : tactic
syntax (name := simpAll) "simp_all " (config)? (discharger)? (&"only ")? ("[" (simpErase <|> simpLemma),* "]")? : tactic
/--
Delta expand the given definition.
This is a low-level tactic, it will expose how recursive definitions have been compiled by Lean. -/
syntax (name := delta) "delta " ident (location)? : tactic
-- Auxiliary macro for lifting have/suffices/let/...
-- It makes sure the "continuation" `?_` is the main goal after refining
macro "refine_lift " e:term : tactic => `(focus (refine no_implicit_lambda% $e; rotate_right))
macro "have " d:haveDecl : tactic => `(refine_lift have $d:haveDecl; ?_)
/- We use a priority > default, to avoid ambiguity with previous `have` notation -/
macro (priority := high) "have" x:ident " := " p:term : tactic => `(have $x:ident : _ := $p)
macro "suffices " d:sufficesDecl : tactic => `(refine_lift suffices $d:sufficesDecl; ?_)
macro "let " d:letDecl : tactic => `(refine_lift let $d:letDecl; ?_)
macro "show " e:term : tactic => `(refine_lift show $e:term from ?_)
syntax (name := letrec) withPosition(atomic(group("let " &"rec ")) letRecDecls) : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| let rec $d:letRecDecls) => `(tactic| refine_lift let rec $d:letRecDecls; ?_)
-- Similar to `refineLift`, but using `refine'`
macro "refine_lift' " e:term : tactic => `(focus (refine' no_implicit_lambda% $e; rotate_right))
macro "have' " d:haveDecl : tactic => `(refine_lift' have $d:haveDecl; ?_)
macro (priority := high) "have'" x:ident " := " p:term : tactic => `(have' $x:ident : _ := $p)
macro "let' " d:letDecl : tactic => `(refine_lift' let $d:letDecl; ?_)
syntax inductionAlt := "| " (group("@"? ident) <|> "_") (ident <|> "_")* " => " (hole <|> syntheticHole <|> tacticSeq)
syntax inductionAlts := "with " (tactic)? withPosition( (colGe inductionAlt)+)
syntax (name := induction) "induction " term,+ (" using " ident)? ("generalizing " ident+)? (inductionAlts)? : tactic
syntax generalizeArg := atomic(ident " : ")? term:51 " = " ident
/--
`generalize ([h :] e = x),+` replaces all occurrences `e`s in the main goal with a fresh hypothesis `x`s.
If `h` is given, `h : e = x` is introduced as well. -/
syntax (name := generalize) "generalize " generalizeArg,+ : tactic
syntax casesTarget := atomic(ident " : ")? term
syntax (name := cases) "cases " casesTarget,+ (" using " ident)? (inductionAlts)? : tactic
syntax (name := existsIntro) "exists " term : tactic
/-- `rename_i x_1 ... x_n` renames the last `n` inaccessible names using the given names. -/
syntax (name := renameI) "rename_i " (colGt (ident <|> "_"))+ : tactic
syntax "repeat " tacticSeq : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| repeat $seq) => `(tactic| first | ($seq); repeat $seq | skip)
syntax "trivial" : tactic
syntax (name := split) "split " (colGt term)? (location)? : tactic
/--
The tactic `specialize h a₁ ... aₙ` works on local hypothesis `h`.
The premises of this hypothesis, either universal quantifications or non-dependent implications,
are instantiated by concrete terms coming either from arguments `a₁` ... `aₙ`.
The tactic adds a new hypothesis with the same name `h := h a₁ ... aₙ` and tries to clear the previous one.
-/
syntax (name := specialize) "specialize " term : tactic
macro_rules | `(tactic| trivial) => `(tactic| assumption)
macro_rules | `(tactic| trivial) => `(tactic| rfl)
macro_rules | `(tactic| trivial) => `(tactic| contradiction)
macro_rules | `(tactic| trivial) => `(tactic| apply True.intro)
macro_rules | `(tactic| trivial) => `(tactic| apply And.intro <;> trivial)
macro "unhygienic " t:tacticSeq : tactic => `(set_option tactic.hygienic false in $t:tacticSeq)
end Tactic
namespace Attr
-- simp attribute syntax
syntax (name := simp) "simp" (Tactic.simpPre <|> Tactic.simpPost)? (prio)? : attr
end Attr
end Parser
end Lean
macro "‹" type:term "›" : term => `((by assumption : $type))
|
ecc0538640585770ac2575818217601c982cd422 | 3f7026ea8bef0825ca0339a275c03b911baef64d | /src/ring_theory/localization.lean | e732fefd4fec97db2546cb4ba0f3ed3b69e47ae5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rspencer01/mathlib | b1e3afa5c121362ef0881012cc116513ab09f18c | c7d36292c6b9234dc40143c16288932ae38fdc12 | refs/heads/master | 1,595,010,346,708 | 1,567,511,503,000 | 1,567,511,503,000 | 206,071,681 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,567,513,643,000 | 1,567,513,643,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,634 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import tactic.ring data.quot data.equiv.algebra ring_theory.ideal_operations group_theory.submonoid
universes u v
namespace localization
variables (α : Type u) [comm_ring α] (S : set α) [is_submonoid S]
def r (x y : α × S) : Prop :=
∃ t ∈ S, ((x.2 : α) * y.1 - y.2 * x.1) * t = 0
local infix ≈ := r α S
section
variables {α S}
theorem r_of_eq {a₀ a₁ : α × S} (h : (a₀.2 : α) * a₁.1 = a₁.2 * a₀.1) : a₀ ≈ a₁ :=
⟨1, is_submonoid.one_mem S, by rw [h, sub_self, mul_one]⟩
end
theorem refl (x : α × S) : x ≈ x := r_of_eq rfl
theorem symm (x y : α × S) : x ≈ y → y ≈ x :=
λ ⟨t, hts, ht⟩, ⟨t, hts, by rw [← neg_sub, ← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, ht, neg_zero]⟩
theorem trans : ∀ (x y z : α × S), x ≈ y → y ≈ z → x ≈ z :=
λ ⟨r₁, s₁, hs₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂, hs₂⟩ ⟨r₃, s₃, hs₃⟩ ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ ⟨t', hts', ht'⟩,
⟨s₂ * t' * t, is_submonoid.mul_mem (is_submonoid.mul_mem hs₂ hts') hts,
calc (s₁ * r₃ - s₃ * r₁) * (s₂ * t' * t) =
t' * s₃ * ((s₁ * r₂ - s₂ * r₁) * t) + t * s₁ * ((s₂ * r₃ - s₃ * r₂) * t') :
by simp [mul_left_comm, mul_add, mul_comm]
... = 0 : by simp only [subtype.coe_mk] at ht ht'; rw [ht, ht']; simp⟩
instance : setoid (α × S) :=
⟨r α S, refl α S, symm α S, trans α S⟩
end localization
/-- The localization of a ring at a submonoid:
the elements of the submonoid become invertible in the localization.-/
def localization (α : Type u) [comm_ring α] (S : set α) [is_submonoid S] :=
quotient $ localization.setoid α S
namespace localization
variables (α : Type u) [comm_ring α] (S : set α) [is_submonoid S]
instance : has_add (localization α S) :=
⟨quotient.lift₂
(λ x y : α × S, (⟦⟨x.2 * y.1 + y.2 * x.1, x.2 * y.2⟩⟧ : localization α S)) $
λ ⟨r₁, s₁, hs₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂, hs₂⟩ ⟨r₃, s₃, hs₃⟩ ⟨r₄, s₄, hs₄⟩ ⟨t₅, hts₅, ht₅⟩ ⟨t₆, hts₆, ht₆⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨t₆ * t₅, is_submonoid.mul_mem hts₆ hts₅,
calc (s₁ * s₂ * (s₃ * r₄ + s₄ * r₃) - s₃ * s₄ * (s₁ * r₂ + s₂ * r₁)) * (t₆ * t₅) =
s₁ * s₃ * ((s₂ * r₄ - s₄ * r₂) * t₆) * t₅ + s₂ * s₄ * ((s₁ * r₃ - s₃ * r₁) * t₅) * t₆ : by ring
... = 0 : by simp only [subtype.coe_mk] at ht₅ ht₆; rw [ht₆, ht₅]; simp⟩⟩
instance : has_neg (localization α S) :=
⟨quotient.lift (λ x : α × S, (⟦⟨-x.1, x.2⟩⟧ : localization α S)) $
λ ⟨r₁, s₁, hs₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂, hs₂⟩ ⟨t, hts, ht⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨t, hts,
calc (s₁ * -r₂ - s₂ * -r₁) * t = -((s₁ * r₂ - s₂ * r₁) * t) : by ring
... = 0 : by simp only [subtype.coe_mk] at ht; rw ht; simp⟩⟩
instance : has_mul (localization α S) :=
⟨quotient.lift₂
(λ x y : α × S, (⟦⟨x.1 * y.1, x.2 * y.2⟩⟧ : localization α S)) $
λ ⟨r₁, s₁, hs₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂, hs₂⟩ ⟨r₃, s₃, hs₃⟩ ⟨r₄, s₄, hs₄⟩ ⟨t₅, hts₅, ht₅⟩ ⟨t₆, hts₆, ht₆⟩,
quotient.sound ⟨t₆ * t₅, is_submonoid.mul_mem hts₆ hts₅,
calc ((s₁ * s₂) * (r₃ * r₄) - (s₃ * s₄) * (r₁ * r₂)) * (t₆ * t₅) =
t₆ * ((s₁ * r₃ - s₃ * r₁) * t₅) * r₂ * s₄ + t₅ * ((s₂ * r₄ - s₄ * r₂) * t₆) * r₃ * s₁ :
by simp [mul_left_comm, mul_add, mul_comm]
... = 0 : by simp only [subtype.coe_mk] at ht₅ ht₆; rw [ht₅, ht₆]; simp⟩⟩
variables {α S}
def mk (r : α) (s : S) : localization α S := ⟦(r, s)⟧
/-- The natural map from the ring to the localization.-/
def of (r : α) : localization α S := mk r 1
instance : comm_ring (localization α S) :=
by refine
{ add := has_add.add,
add_assoc := λ m n k, quotient.induction_on₃ m n k _,
zero := of 0,
zero_add := quotient.ind _,
add_zero := quotient.ind _,
neg := has_neg.neg,
add_left_neg := quotient.ind _,
add_comm := quotient.ind₂ _,
mul := has_mul.mul,
mul_assoc := λ m n k, quotient.induction_on₃ m n k _,
one := of 1,
one_mul := quotient.ind _,
mul_one := quotient.ind _,
left_distrib := λ m n k, quotient.induction_on₃ m n k _,
right_distrib := λ m n k, quotient.induction_on₃ m n k _,
mul_comm := quotient.ind₂ _ };
{ intros,
try {rcases a with ⟨r₁, s₁, hs₁⟩},
try {rcases b with ⟨r₂, s₂, hs₂⟩},
try {rcases c with ⟨r₃, s₃, hs₃⟩},
refine (quotient.sound $ r_of_eq _),
simp [mul_left_comm, mul_add, mul_comm] }
instance of.is_ring_hom : is_ring_hom (of : α → localization α S) :=
{ map_add := λ x y, quotient.sound $ by simp,
map_mul := λ x y, quotient.sound $ by simp,
map_one := rfl }
variables {S}
instance : has_coe α (localization α S) := ⟨of⟩
instance coe.is_ring_hom : is_ring_hom (coe : α → localization α S) :=
localization.of.is_ring_hom
/-- The natural map from the submonoid to the unit group of the localization.-/
def to_units (s : S) : units (localization α S) :=
{ val := s,
inv := mk 1 s,
val_inv := quotient.sound $ r_of_eq $ mul_assoc _ _ _,
inv_val := quotient.sound $ r_of_eq $ show s.val * 1 * 1 = 1 * (1 * s.val), by simp }
@[simp] lemma to_units_coe (s : S) : ((to_units s) : localization α S) = s := rfl
section
variables (α S) (x y : α) (n : ℕ)
@[simp] lemma of_zero : (of 0 : localization α S) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_one : (of 1 : localization α S) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_add : (of (x + y) : localization α S) = of x + of y :=
by apply is_ring_hom.map_add
@[simp] lemma of_sub : (of (x - y) : localization α S) = of x - of y :=
by apply is_ring_hom.map_sub
@[simp] lemma of_mul : (of (x * y) : localization α S) = of x * of y :=
by apply is_ring_hom.map_mul
@[simp] lemma of_neg : (of (-x) : localization α S) = -of x :=
by apply is_ring_hom.map_neg
@[simp] lemma of_pow : (of (x ^ n) : localization α S) = (of x) ^ n :=
by apply is_semiring_hom.map_pow
@[simp] lemma of_is_unit (s : S) : is_unit (of s : localization α S) :=
is_unit_unit $ to_units s
@[simp] lemma of_is_unit' (s ∈ S) : is_unit (of s : localization α S) :=
is_unit_unit $ to_units ⟨s, ‹s ∈ S›⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : α) : localization α S) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ((1 : α) : localization α S) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add : (↑(x + y) : localization α S) = x + y := of_add _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_sub : (↑(x - y) : localization α S) = x - y := of_sub _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_mul : (↑(x * y) : localization α S) = x * y := of_mul _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_neg : (↑(-x) : localization α S) = -x := of_neg _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_pow : (↑(x ^ n) : localization α S) = x ^ n := of_pow _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_is_unit (s : S) : is_unit (s : localization α S) := of_is_unit _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_is_unit' (s ∈ S) : is_unit (s : localization α S) := of_is_unit' _ _ _ ‹s ∈ S›
end
@[simp] lemma mk_self {x : α} {hx : x ∈ S} :
(mk x ⟨x, hx⟩ : localization α S) = 1 :=
quotient.sound ⟨1, is_submonoid.one_mem S,
by simp only [subtype.coe_mk, is_submonoid.coe_one, mul_one, one_mul, sub_self]⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_self' {s : S} :
(mk s s : localization α S) = 1 :=
by cases s; exact mk_self
@[simp] lemma mk_self'' {s : S} :
(mk s.1 s : localization α S) = 1 :=
mk_self'
@[simp] lemma coe_mul_mk (x y : α) (s : S) :
↑x * mk y s = mk (x * y) s :=
quotient.sound $ r_of_eq $ by rw one_mul
lemma mk_eq_mul_mk_one (r : α) (s : S) :
mk r s = r * mk 1 s :=
by rw [coe_mul_mk, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma mk_mul_mk (x y : α) (s t : S) :
mk x s * mk y t = mk (x * y) (s * t) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_mul_cancel_left (r : α) (s : S) :
mk (↑s * r) s = r :=
by rw [mk_eq_mul_mk_one, mul_comm ↑s, coe_mul,
mul_assoc, ← mk_eq_mul_mk_one, mk_self', mul_one]
@[simp] lemma mk_mul_cancel_right (r : α) (s : S) :
mk (r * s) s = r :=
by rw [mul_comm, mk_mul_cancel_left]
@[simp] lemma mk_eq (r : α) (s : S) :
mk r s = r * ((to_units s)⁻¹ : units _) :=
quotient.sound $ by simp
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on {C : localization α S → Prop} (x : localization α S)
(ih : ∀ r s, C (mk r s : localization α S)) : C x :=
by rcases x with ⟨r, s⟩; exact ih r s
section
variables {β : Type v} [comm_ring β] {T : set β} [is_submonoid T] (f : α → β) [is_ring_hom f]
@[elab_with_expected_type]
def lift' (g : S → units β) (hg : ∀ s, (g s : β) = f s) (x : localization α S) : β :=
quotient.lift_on x (λ p, f p.1 * ((g p.2)⁻¹ : units β)) $ λ ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂⟩ ⟨t, hts, ht⟩,
show f r₁ * ↑(g s₁)⁻¹ = f r₂ * ↑(g s₂)⁻¹, from
calc f r₁ * ↑(g s₁)⁻¹
= (f r₁ * g s₂ + ((g s₁ * f r₂ - g s₂ * f r₁) * g ⟨t, hts⟩) * ↑(g ⟨t, hts⟩)⁻¹)
* ↑(g s₁)⁻¹ * ↑(g s₂)⁻¹ :
by simp only [hg, subtype.coe_mk, (is_ring_hom.map_mul f).symm, (is_ring_hom.map_sub f).symm,
ht, is_ring_hom.map_zero f, zero_mul, add_zero];
rw [is_ring_hom.map_mul f, ← hg, mul_right_comm,
mul_assoc (f r₁), ← units.coe_mul, mul_inv_self];
rw [units.coe_one, mul_one]
... = f r₂ * ↑(g s₂)⁻¹ :
by rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← units.coe_mul, mul_inv_self, units.coe_one,
mul_one, mul_comm ↑(g s₂), add_sub_cancel'_right];
rw [mul_comm ↑(g s₁), ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc (f r₂), ← units.coe_mul,
mul_inv_self, units.coe_one, mul_one]
instance lift'.is_ring_hom (g : S → units β) (hg : ∀ s, (g s : β) = f s) :
is_ring_hom (localization.lift' f g hg) :=
{ map_one := have g 1 = 1, from units.ext (by rw hg; exact is_ring_hom.map_one f),
show f 1 * ↑(g 1)⁻¹ = 1, by rw [this, one_inv, units.coe_one, mul_one, is_ring_hom.map_one f],
map_mul := λ x y, localization.induction_on x $ λ r₁ s₁,
localization.induction_on y $ λ r₂ s₂,
have g (s₁ * s₂) = g s₁ * g s₂,
from units.ext (by simp only [hg, units.coe_mul]; exact is_ring_hom.map_mul f),
show _ * ↑(g (_ * _))⁻¹ = (_ * _) * (_ * _),
by simp only [subtype.coe_mk, mul_one, one_mul, subtype.coe_eta, this, mul_inv_rev];
rw [is_ring_hom.map_mul f, units.coe_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc];
simp only [mul_right_comm],
map_add := λ x y, localization.induction_on x $ λ r₁ s₁,
localization.induction_on y $ λ r₂ s₂,
have g (s₁ * s₂) = g s₁ * g s₂,
from units.ext (by simp only [hg, units.coe_mul]; exact is_ring_hom.map_mul f),
show _ * ↑(g (_ * _))⁻¹ = _ * _ + _ * _,
by simp only [subtype.coe_mk, mul_one, one_mul, subtype.coe_eta, this, mul_inv_rev];
simp only [is_ring_hom.map_mul f, is_ring_hom.map_add f, add_mul, (hg _).symm];
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, (units.coe_mul _ _).symm];
rw [mul_inv_cancel_left, mul_left_comm, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_right, add_comm] }
noncomputable def lift (h : ∀ s ∈ S, is_unit (f s)) :
localization α S → β :=
localization.lift' f (λ s, classical.some $ h s.1 s.2)
(λ s, by rw [← classical.some_spec (h s.1 s.2)]; refl)
instance lift.is_ring_hom (h : ∀ s ∈ S, is_unit (f s)) :
is_ring_hom (lift f h) :=
lift'.is_ring_hom _ _ _
@[simp] lemma lift'_mk (g : S → units β) (hg : ∀ s, (g s : β) = f s) (r : α) (s : S) :
lift' f g hg (mk r s) = f r * ↑(g s)⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] lemma lift'_of (g : S → units β) (hg : ∀ s, (g s : β) = f s) (a : α) :
lift' f g hg (of a) = f a :=
have g 1 = 1, from units.ext_iff.2 $ by simp [hg, is_ring_hom.map_one f],
by simp [lift', quotient.lift_on_beta, of, mk, this]
@[simp] lemma lift'_coe (g : S → units β) (hg : ∀ s, (g s : β) = f s) (a : α) :
lift' f g hg a = f a := lift'_of _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma lift_of (h : ∀ s ∈ S, is_unit (f s)) (a : α) :
lift f h (of a) = f a := lift'_of _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma lift_coe (h : ∀ s ∈ S, is_unit (f s)) (a : α) :
lift f h a = f a := lift'_of _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma lift'_comp_of (g : S → units β) (hg : ∀ s, (g s : β) = f s) :
lift' f g hg ∘ of = f := funext $ λ a, lift'_of _ _ _ a
@[simp] lemma lift_comp_of (h : ∀ s ∈ S, is_unit (f s)) :
lift f h ∘ of = f := lift'_comp_of _ _ _
@[simp] lemma lift'_apply_coe (f : localization α S → β) [is_ring_hom f]
(g : S → units β) (hg : ∀ s, (g s : β) = f s) :
lift' (λ a : α, f a) g hg = f :=
have g = (λ s, (units.map' f : units (localization α S) → units β) (to_units s)),
from funext $ λ x, units.ext $ (hg x).symm ▸ rfl,
funext $ λ x, localization.induction_on x
(λ r s, by subst this; rw [lift'_mk, ← (units.map' f).map_inv, units.coe_map'];
simp [is_ring_hom.map_mul f])
@[simp] lemma lift_apply_coe (f : localization α S → β) [is_ring_hom f] :
lift (λ a : α, f a)
(λ s hs, is_unit.map' f (is_unit_unit (to_units ⟨s, hs⟩))) = f :=
by rw [lift, lift'_apply_coe]
/-- Function extensionality for localisations:
two functions are equal if they agree on elements that are coercions.-/
protected lemma funext (f g : localization α S → β) [is_ring_hom f] [is_ring_hom g]
(h : ∀ a : α, f a = g a) : f = g :=
begin
rw [← lift_apply_coe f, ← lift_apply_coe g],
congr' 1,
exact funext h
end
variables {α S T}
def map (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s ∈ T) : localization α S → localization β T :=
lift' (of ∘ f) (to_units ∘ subtype.map f hf) (λ s, rfl)
instance map.is_ring_hom (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s ∈ T) : is_ring_hom (map f hf) :=
lift'.is_ring_hom _ _ _
@[simp] lemma map_of (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s ∈ T) (a : α) :
map f hf (of a) = of (f a) := lift'_of _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma map_coe (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s ∈ T) (a : α) :
map f hf a = (f a) := lift'_of _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma map_comp_of (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s ∈ T) :
map f hf ∘ of = of ∘ f := funext $ λ a, map_of _ _ _
@[simp] lemma map_id : map id (λ s (hs : s ∈ S), hs) = id :=
localization.funext _ _ $ map_coe _ _
lemma map_comp_map {γ : Type*} [comm_ring γ] (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s ∈ T) (U : set γ)
[is_submonoid U] (g : β → γ) [is_ring_hom g] (hg : ∀ t ∈ T, g t ∈ U) :
map g hg ∘ map f hf = map (λ x, g (f x)) (λ s hs, hg _ (hf _ hs)) :=
localization.funext _ _ $ by simp
lemma map_map {γ : Type*} [comm_ring γ] (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s ∈ T) (U : set γ)
[is_submonoid U] (g : β → γ) [is_ring_hom g] (hg : ∀ t ∈ T, g t ∈ U) (x) :
map g hg (map f hf x) = map (λ x, g (f x)) (λ s hs, hg _ (hf _ hs)) x :=
congr_fun (map_comp_map _ _ _ _ _) x
def equiv_of_equiv (h₁ : α ≃r β) (h₂ : h₁.to_equiv '' S = T) :
localization α S ≃r localization β T :=
{ to_fun := map h₁.to_equiv $ λ s hs, by {rw ← h₂, simp [hs]},
inv_fun := map h₁.symm.to_equiv $ λ t ht,
by simp [equiv.image_eq_preimage, set.preimage, set.ext_iff, *] at *,
left_inv := λ _, by simp only [map_map, ring_equiv.to_equiv_symm_apply,
equiv.symm_apply_apply]; erw map_id; refl,
right_inv := λ _, by simp only [map_map, ring_equiv.to_equiv_symm_apply,
equiv.apply_symm_apply]; erw map_id; refl,
hom := map.is_ring_hom _ _ }
end
section away
variables {β : Type v} [comm_ring β] (f : α → β) [is_ring_hom f]
@[reducible] def away (x : α) := localization α (powers x)
@[simp] def away.inv_self (x : α) : away x :=
mk 1 ⟨x, 1, pow_one x⟩
@[elab_with_expected_type]
noncomputable def away.lift {x : α} (hfx : is_unit (f x)) : away x → β :=
localization.lift' f (λ s, classical.some hfx ^ classical.some s.2) $ λ s,
by rw [units.coe_pow, ← classical.some_spec hfx,
← is_semiring_hom.map_pow f, classical.some_spec s.2]; refl
instance away.lift.is_ring_hom {x : α} (hfx : is_unit (f x)) :
is_ring_hom (localization.away.lift f hfx) :=
lift'.is_ring_hom _ _ _
@[simp] lemma away.lift_of {x : α} (hfx : is_unit (f x)) (a : α) :
away.lift f hfx (of a) = f a := lift'_of _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma away.lift_coe {x : α} (hfx : is_unit (f x)) (a : α) :
away.lift f hfx a = f a := lift'_of _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma away.lift_comp_of {x : α} (hfx : is_unit (f x)) :
away.lift f hfx ∘ of = f := lift'_comp_of _ _ _
noncomputable def away_to_away_right (x y : α) : away x → away (x * y) :=
localization.away.lift coe $
is_unit_of_mul_one x (y * away.inv_self (x * y)) $
by rw [away.inv_self, coe_mul_mk, coe_mul_mk, mul_one, mk_self]
instance away_to_away_right.is_ring_hom (x y : α) :
is_ring_hom (away_to_away_right x y) :=
away.lift.is_ring_hom _ _
end away
section at_prime
variables (P : ideal α) [hp : ideal.is_prime P]
include hp
instance prime.is_submonoid :
is_submonoid (-P : set α) :=
{ one_mem := P.ne_top_iff_one.1 hp.1,
mul_mem := λ x y hnx hny hxy, or.cases_on (hp.2 hxy) hnx hny }
@[reducible] def at_prime := localization α (-P)
instance at_prime.local_ring : local_ring (at_prime P) :=
local_of_nonunits_ideal
(λ hze,
let ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := quotient.exact hze in
hts $ have htz : t = 0, by simpa using ht,
suffices (0:α) ∈ P, by rwa htz,
P.zero_mem)
(begin
rintro ⟨⟨r₁, s₁, hs₁⟩⟩ ⟨⟨r₂, s₂, hs₂⟩⟩ hx hy hu,
rcases is_unit_iff_exists_inv.1 hu with ⟨⟨⟨r₃, s₃, hs₃⟩⟩, hz⟩,
rcases quotient.exact hz with ⟨t, hts, ht⟩,
simp at ht,
have : ∀ {r s hs}, (⟦⟨r, s, hs⟩⟧ : at_prime P) ∈ nonunits (at_prime P) → r ∈ P,
{ haveI := classical.dec,
exact λ r s hs, not_imp_comm.1 (λ nr,
is_unit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨⟦⟨s, r, nr⟩⟧,
quotient.sound $ r_of_eq $ by simp [mul_comm]⟩) },
have hr₃ := (hp.mem_or_mem_of_mul_eq_zero ht).resolve_right hts,
have := (ideal.add_mem_iff_left _ _).1 hr₃,
{ exact not_or (mt hp.mem_or_mem (not_or hs₁ hs₂)) hs₃ (hp.mem_or_mem this) },
{ exact P.neg_mem (P.mul_mem_right
(P.add_mem (P.mul_mem_left (this hy)) (P.mul_mem_left (this hx)))) }
end)
end at_prime
variable (α)
def non_zero_divisors : set α := {x | ∀ z, z * x = 0 → z = 0}
instance non_zero_divisors.is_submonoid : is_submonoid (non_zero_divisors α) :=
{ one_mem := λ z hz, by rwa mul_one at hz,
mul_mem := λ x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ z hz,
have z * x₁ * x₂ = 0, by rwa mul_assoc,
hx₁ z $ hx₂ (z * x₁) this }
@[simp] lemma non_zero_divisors_one_val : (1 : non_zero_divisors α).val = 1 := rfl
/-- The field of fractions of an integral domain.-/
@[reducible] def fraction_ring := localization α (non_zero_divisors α)
namespace fraction_ring
open function
variables {β : Type u} [integral_domain β] [decidable_eq β]
lemma eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {x y : β} :
x ≠ 0 → y * x = 0 → y = 0 :=
λ hnx hxy, or.resolve_right (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hxy) hnx
lemma mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero {x : β} :
x ∈ non_zero_divisors β ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨λ hm hz, zero_ne_one (hm 1 $ by rw [hz, one_mul]).symm,
λ hnx z, eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hnx⟩
variable (β)
def inv_aux (x : β × (non_zero_divisors β)) : fraction_ring β :=
if h : x.1 = 0 then 0 else ⟦⟨x.2, x.1, mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr h⟩⟧
instance : has_inv (fraction_ring β) :=
⟨quotient.lift (inv_aux β) $
λ ⟨r₁, s₁, hs₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂, hs₂⟩ ⟨t, hts, ht⟩,
begin
have hrs : s₁ * r₂ = 0 + s₂ * r₁,
from sub_eq_iff_eq_add.1 (hts _ ht),
by_cases hr₁ : r₁ = 0;
by_cases hr₂ : r₂ = 0;
simp [hr₁, hr₂] at hrs;
simp only [inv_aux, hr₁, hr₂, dif_pos, dif_neg, not_false_iff, subtype.coe_mk, quotient.eq],
{ exfalso,
exact mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mp hs₁ hrs },
{ exfalso,
exact mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mp hs₂ hrs },
{ apply r_of_eq,
simpa [mul_comm] using hrs.symm }
end⟩
lemma mk_inv {r s} :
(mk r s : fraction_ring β)⁻¹ =
if h : r = 0 then 0 else ⟦⟨s, r, mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr h⟩⟧ := rfl
lemma mk_inv' :
∀ (x : β × (non_zero_divisors β)), (⟦x⟧⁻¹ : fraction_ring β) =
if h : x.1 = 0 then 0 else ⟦⟨x.2.val, x.1, mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr h⟩⟧
| ⟨r,s,hs⟩ := rfl
instance : decidable_eq (fraction_ring β) :=
@quotient.decidable_eq (β × non_zero_divisors β) (localization.setoid β (non_zero_divisors β)) $
λ ⟨r₁, s₁, hs₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂, hs₂⟩, show decidable (∃ t ∈ non_zero_divisors β, (s₁ * r₂ - s₂ * r₁) * t = 0),
from decidable_of_iff (s₁ * r₂ - s₂ * r₁ = 0)
⟨λ H, ⟨1, λ y, (mul_one y).symm ▸ id, H.symm ▸ zero_mul _⟩,
λ ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩, or.resolve_right (mul_eq_zero.1 ht2) $ λ ht,
one_ne_zero (ht1 1 ((one_mul t).symm ▸ ht))⟩
instance : discrete_field (fraction_ring β) :=
by refine
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
zero_ne_one := λ hzo,
let ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := quotient.exact hzo in
zero_ne_one (by simpa using hts _ ht : 0 = 1),
mul_inv_cancel := quotient.ind _,
inv_mul_cancel := quotient.ind _,
has_decidable_eq := fraction_ring.decidable_eq β,
inv_zero := dif_pos rfl,
.. localization.comm_ring };
{ intros x hnx,
rcases x with ⟨x, z, hz⟩,
have : x ≠ 0,
from assume hx, hnx (quotient.sound $ r_of_eq $ by simp [hx]),
simp only [has_inv.inv, inv_aux, quotient.lift_beta, dif_neg this],
exact (quotient.sound $ r_of_eq $ by simp [mul_comm]) }
@[simp] lemma mk_eq_div {r s} : (mk r s : fraction_ring β) = (r / s : fraction_ring β) :=
show _ = _ * dite (s.1 = 0) _ _, by rw [dif_neg (mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mp s.2)];
exact localization.mk_eq_mul_mk_one _ _
variables {β}
@[simp] lemma mk_eq_div' (x : β × (non_zero_divisors β)) :
(⟦x⟧ : fraction_ring β) = ((x.1) / ((x.2).val) : fraction_ring β) :=
by erw ← mk_eq_div; cases x; refl
lemma eq_zero_of (x : β) (h : (of x : fraction_ring β) = 0) : x = 0 :=
begin
rcases quotient.exact h with ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩,
simpa [mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.mp ht] using ht'
end
lemma of.injective : function.injective (of : β → fraction_ring β) :=
(is_add_group_hom.injective_iff _).mpr eq_zero_of
section map
open function is_ring_hom
variables {A : Type u} [integral_domain A] [decidable_eq A]
variables {B : Type v} [integral_domain B] [decidable_eq B]
variables (f : A → B) [is_ring_hom f]
def map (hf : injective f) : fraction_ring A → fraction_ring B :=
localization.map f $ λ s h,
by rw [mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero, ← map_zero f, ne.def, hf.eq_iff];
exact mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero.1 h
@[simp] lemma map_of (hf : injective f) (a : A) : map f hf (of a) = of (f a) :=
localization.map_of _ _ _
@[simp] lemma map_coe (hf : injective f) (a : A) : map f hf a = f a :=
localization.map_coe _ _ _
@[simp] lemma map_comp_of (hf : injective f) :
map f hf ∘ (of : A → fraction_ring A) = (of : B → fraction_ring B) ∘ f :=
localization.map_comp_of _ _
instance map.is_field_hom (hf : injective f) : is_field_hom (map f hf) :=
localization.map.is_ring_hom _ _
def equiv_of_equiv (h : A ≃r B) : fraction_ring A ≃r fraction_ring B :=
localization.equiv_of_equiv h
begin
ext b,
rw [equiv.image_eq_preimage, set.preimage, set.mem_set_of_eq,
mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero, mem_non_zero_divisors_iff_ne_zero, ne.def],
exact ⟨mt (λ h, h.symm ▸ is_ring_hom.map_zero _),
mt ((is_add_group_hom.injective_iff _).1 h.to_equiv.symm.injective _)⟩
end
end map
end fraction_ring
section ideals
theorem map_comap (J : ideal (localization α S)) :
ideal.map coe (ideal.comap (coe : α → localization α S) J) = J :=
le_antisymm (ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (le_refl _)) $ λ x,
localization.induction_on x $ λ r s hJ, (submodule.mem_coe _).2 $
mul_one r ▸ coe_mul_mk r 1 s ▸ (ideal.mul_mem_right _ $ ideal.mem_map_of_mem $
have _ := @ideal.mul_mem_left (localization α S) _ _ s _ hJ,
by rwa [coe_coe, coe_mul_mk, mk_mul_cancel_left] at this)
def le_order_embedding :
((≤) : ideal (localization α S) → ideal (localization α S) → Prop) ≼o
((≤) : ideal α → ideal α → Prop) :=
{ to_fun := λ J, ideal.comap coe J,
inj := function.injective_of_left_inverse (map_comap α),
ord := λ J₁ J₂, ⟨ideal.comap_mono, λ hJ,
map_comap α J₁ ▸ map_comap α J₂ ▸ ideal.map_mono hJ⟩ }
end ideals
end localization
|
4f9b84187342f5c1db116c3692a54f641884d8f9 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/order/filter/lift.lean | 81c48e3e98b27a3dffb42dffd0fd480765aa58da | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,406 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import order.filter.bases
/-!
# Lift filters along filter and set functions
-/
open set
open_locale classical filter
namespace filter
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section lift
/-- A variant on `bind` using a function `g` taking a set instead of a member of `α`.
This is essentially a push-forward along a function mapping each set to a filter. -/
protected def lift (f : filter α) (g : set α → filter β) :=
⨅s ∈ f, g s
variables {f f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g g₁ g₂ : set α → filter β}
@[simp] lemma lift_top (g : set α → filter β) : (⊤ : filter α).lift g = g univ :=
by simp [filter.lift]
/-- If `(p : ι → Prop, s : ι → set α)` is a basis of a filter `f`, `g` is a monotone function
`set α → filter γ`, and for each `i`, `(pg : β i → Prop, sg : β i → set α)` is a basis
of the filter `g (s i)`, then `(λ (i : ι) (x : β i), p i ∧ pg i x, λ (i : ι) (x : β i), sg i x)`
is a basis of the filter `f.lift g`.
This basis is parametrized by `i : ι` and `x : β i`, so in order to formulate this fact using
`has_basis` one has to use `Σ i, β i` as the index type, see `filter.has_basis.lift`.
This lemma states the corresponding `mem_iff` statement without using a sigma type. -/
lemma has_basis.mem_lift_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {f : filter α}
(hf : f.has_basis p s) {β : ι → Type*} {pg : Π i, β i → Prop} {sg : Π i, β i → set γ}
{g : set α → filter γ} (hg : ∀ i, (g $ s i).has_basis (pg i) (sg i)) (gm : monotone g)
{s : set γ} :
s ∈ f.lift g ↔ ∃ (i : ι) (hi : p i) (x : β i) (hx : pg i x), sg i x ⊆ s :=
begin
refine (mem_binfi_of_directed _ ⟨univ, univ_sets _⟩).trans _,
{ intros t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂,
exact ⟨t₁ ∩ t₂, inter_mem ht₁ ht₂, gm $ inter_subset_left _ _,
gm $ inter_subset_right _ _⟩ },
{ simp only [← (hg _).mem_iff],
exact hf.exists_iff (λ t₁ t₂ ht H, gm ht H) }
end
/-- If `(p : ι → Prop, s : ι → set α)` is a basis of a filter `f`, `g` is a monotone function
`set α → filter γ`, and for each `i`, `(pg : β i → Prop, sg : β i → set α)` is a basis
of the filter `g (s i)`, then `(λ (i : ι) (x : β i), p i ∧ pg i x, λ (i : ι) (x : β i), sg i x)`
is a basis of the filter `f.lift g`.
This basis is parametrized by `i : ι` and `x : β i`, so in order to formulate this fact using
`has_basis` one has to use `Σ i, β i` as the index type. See also `filter.has_basis.mem_lift_iff`
for the corresponding `mem_iff` statement formulated without using a sigma type. -/
lemma has_basis.lift {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {f : filter α} (hf : f.has_basis p s)
{β : ι → Type*} {pg : Π i, β i → Prop} {sg : Π i, β i → set γ} {g : set α → filter γ}
(hg : ∀ i, (g $ s i).has_basis (pg i) (sg i)) (gm : monotone g) :
(f.lift g).has_basis (λ i : Σ i, β i, p i.1 ∧ pg i.1 i.2) (λ i : Σ i, β i, sg i.1 i.2) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, (hf.mem_lift_iff hg gm).trans _⟩,
simp [sigma.exists, and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_left]
end
lemma mem_lift_sets (hg : monotone g) {s : set β} :
s ∈ f.lift g ↔ ∃t∈f, s ∈ g t :=
(f.basis_sets.mem_lift_iff (λ s, (g s).basis_sets) hg).trans $
by simp only [id, exists_mem_subset_iff]
lemma mem_lift {s : set β} {t : set α} (ht : t ∈ f) (hs : s ∈ g t) :
s ∈ f.lift g :=
le_principal_iff.mp $ show f.lift g ≤ 𝓟 s,
from infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le_of_le ht $ le_principal_iff.mpr hs
lemma lift_le {f : filter α} {g : set α → filter β} {h : filter β} {s : set α}
(hs : s ∈ f) (hg : g s ≤ h) : f.lift g ≤ h :=
infi₂_le_of_le s hs hg
lemma le_lift {f : filter α} {g : set α → filter β} {h : filter β}
(hh : ∀s∈f, h ≤ g s) : h ≤ f.lift g :=
le_infi₂ hh
lemma lift_mono (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f₁.lift g₁ ≤ f₂.lift g₂ :=
infi_mono $ λ s, infi_mono' $ λ hs, ⟨hf hs, hg s⟩
lemma lift_mono' (hg : ∀s ∈ f, g₁ s ≤ g₂ s) : f.lift g₁ ≤ f.lift g₂ := infi₂_mono hg
lemma tendsto_lift {m : γ → β} {l : filter γ} :
tendsto m l (f.lift g) ↔ ∀ s ∈ f, tendsto m l (g s) :=
by simp only [filter.lift, tendsto_infi]
lemma map_lift_eq {m : β → γ} (hg : monotone g) : map m (f.lift g) = f.lift (map m ∘ g) :=
have monotone (map m ∘ g),
from map_mono.comp hg,
filter.ext $ λ s,
by simp only [mem_lift_sets hg, mem_lift_sets this, exists_prop, mem_map, function.comp_app]
lemma comap_lift_eq {m : γ → β} (hg : monotone g) : comap m (f.lift g) = f.lift (comap m ∘ g) :=
have monotone (comap m ∘ g),
from comap_mono.comp hg,
begin
ext,
simp only [mem_lift_sets hg, mem_lift_sets this, mem_comap, exists_prop, mem_lift_sets],
exact ⟨λ ⟨b, ⟨a, ha, hb⟩, hs⟩, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hs⟩, λ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hs⟩, ⟨b, ⟨a, ha, hb⟩, hs⟩⟩
end
theorem comap_lift_eq2 {m : β → α} {g : set β → filter γ} (hg : monotone g) :
(comap m f).lift g = f.lift (g ∘ preimage m) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs,
infi_le_of_le (preimage m s) $ infi_le _ ⟨s, hs, subset.refl _⟩)
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume ⟨s', hs', (h_sub : preimage m s' ⊆ s)⟩,
infi_le_of_le s' $ infi_le_of_le hs' $ hg h_sub)
lemma map_lift_eq2 {g : set β → filter γ} {m : α → β} (hg : monotone g) :
(map m f).lift g = f.lift (g ∘ image m) :=
le_antisymm
(infi_mono' $ assume s, ⟨image m s,
infi_mono' $ assume hs, ⟨
f.sets_of_superset hs $ assume a h, mem_image_of_mem _ h,
le_rfl⟩⟩)
(infi_mono' $ assume t, ⟨preimage m t,
infi_mono' $ assume ht, ⟨ht,
hg $ assume x, assume h : x ∈ m '' preimage m t,
let ⟨y, hy, h_eq⟩ := h in
show x ∈ t, from h_eq ▸ hy⟩⟩)
lemma lift_comm {g : filter β} {h : set α → set β → filter γ} :
f.lift (λs, g.lift (h s)) = g.lift (λt, f.lift (λs, h s t)) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume hi, le_infi $ assume j, le_infi $ assume hj,
infi_le_of_le j $ infi_le_of_le hj $ infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ hi)
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume hi, le_infi $ assume j, le_infi $ assume hj,
infi_le_of_le j $ infi_le_of_le hj $ infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le _ hi)
lemma lift_assoc {h : set β → filter γ} (hg : monotone g) :
(f.lift g).lift h = f.lift (λs, (g s).lift h) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, le_infi $ assume t, le_infi $ assume ht,
infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le _ $ (mem_lift_sets hg).mpr ⟨_, hs, ht⟩)
(le_infi $ assume t, le_infi $ assume ht,
let ⟨s, hs, h'⟩ := (mem_lift_sets hg).mp ht in
infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le_of_le hs $ infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le _ h')
lemma lift_lift_same_le_lift {g : set α → set α → filter β} :
f.lift (λs, f.lift (g s)) ≤ f.lift (λs, g s s) :=
le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le_of_le hs $ infi_le_of_le s $
infi_le _ hs
lemma lift_lift_same_eq_lift {g : set α → set α → filter β}
(hg₁ : ∀s, monotone (λt, g s t)) (hg₂ : ∀t, monotone (λs, g s t)) :
f.lift (λs, f.lift (g s)) = f.lift (λs, g s s) :=
le_antisymm
lift_lift_same_le_lift
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, le_infi $ assume t, le_infi $ assume ht,
infi_le_of_le (s ∩ t) $
infi_le_of_le (inter_mem hs ht) $
calc g (s ∩ t) (s ∩ t) ≤ g s (s ∩ t) : hg₂ (s ∩ t) (inter_subset_left _ _)
... ≤ g s t : hg₁ s (inter_subset_right _ _))
lemma lift_principal {s : set α} (hg : monotone g) :
(𝓟 s).lift g = g s :=
le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le _ $ subset.refl _)
(le_infi $ assume t, le_infi $ assume hi, hg hi)
theorem monotone_lift [preorder γ] {f : γ → filter α} {g : γ → set α → filter β}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λc, (f c).lift (g c)) :=
assume a b h, lift_mono (hf h) (hg h)
lemma lift_ne_bot_iff (hm : monotone g) : (ne_bot $ f.lift g) ↔ (∀s∈f, ne_bot (g s)) :=
begin
rw [filter.lift, infi_subtype', infi_ne_bot_iff_of_directed', subtype.forall'],
{ rintros ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨t, ht⟩,
exact ⟨⟨s ∩ t, inter_mem hs ht⟩, hm (inter_subset_left s t), hm (inter_subset_right s t)⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma lift_const {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : f.lift (λx, g) = g :=
le_antisymm (lift_le univ_mem $ le_refl g) (le_lift $ assume s hs, le_refl g)
@[simp] lemma lift_inf {f : filter α} {g h : set α → filter β} :
f.lift (λx, g x ⊓ h x) = f.lift g ⊓ f.lift h :=
by simp only [filter.lift, infi_inf_eq, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma lift_principal2 {f : filter α} : f.lift 𝓟 = f :=
le_antisymm
(assume s hs, mem_lift hs (mem_principal_self s))
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, by simp only [hs, le_principal_iff])
lemma lift_infi {f : ι → filter α} {g : set α → filter β}
[hι : nonempty ι] (hg : ∀{s t}, g s ⊓ g t = g (s ∩ t)) : (infi f).lift g = (⨅i, (f i).lift g) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, lift_mono (infi_le _ _) le_rfl)
(assume s,
have g_mono : monotone g,
from assume s t h, le_of_inf_eq $ eq.trans hg $ congr_arg g $ inter_eq_self_of_subset_left h,
have ∀t∈(infi f), (⨅ (i : ι), filter.lift (f i) g) ≤ g t,
from assume t ht, infi_sets_induct ht
(let ⟨i⟩ := hι in infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le_of_le univ $ infi_le _ univ_mem)
(assume i s₁ s₂ hs₁ hs₂,
@hg s₁ s₂ ▸ le_inf (infi_le_of_le i $ infi_le_of_le s₁ $ infi_le _ hs₁) hs₂),
begin
simp only [mem_lift_sets g_mono, exists_imp_distrib],
exact assume t ht hs, this t ht hs
end)
end lift
section lift'
/-- Specialize `lift` to functions `set α → set β`. This can be viewed as a generalization of `map`.
This is essentially a push-forward along a function mapping each set to a set. -/
protected def lift' (f : filter α) (h : set α → set β) :=
f.lift (𝓟 ∘ h)
variables {f f₁ f₂ : filter α} {h h₁ h₂ : set α → set β}
@[simp] lemma lift'_top (h : set α → set β) : (⊤ : filter α).lift' h = 𝓟 (h univ) :=
lift_top _
lemma mem_lift' {t : set α} (ht : t ∈ f) : h t ∈ (f.lift' h) :=
le_principal_iff.mp $ show f.lift' h ≤ 𝓟 (h t),
from infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le_of_le ht $ le_rfl
lemma tendsto_lift' {m : γ → β} {l : filter γ} :
tendsto m l (f.lift' h) ↔ ∀ s ∈ f, ∀ᶠ a in l, m a ∈ h s :=
by simp only [filter.lift', tendsto_lift, tendsto_principal]
lemma has_basis.lift' {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} (hf : f.has_basis p s) (hh : monotone h) :
(f.lift' h).has_basis p (h ∘ s) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, (hf.mem_lift_iff _ (monotone_principal.comp hh)).trans _⟩,
show ∀ i, (𝓟 (h (s i))).has_basis (λ j : unit, true) (λ (j : unit), h (s i)),
from λ i, has_basis_principal _,
simp only [exists_const]
end
lemma mem_lift'_sets (hh : monotone h) {s : set β} : s ∈ (f.lift' h) ↔ (∃t∈f, h t ⊆ s) :=
mem_lift_sets $ monotone_principal.comp hh
lemma eventually_lift'_iff (hh : monotone h) {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in f.lift' h, p y) ↔ (∃ t ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ h t, p y) :=
mem_lift'_sets hh
lemma lift'_le {f : filter α} {g : set α → set β} {h : filter β} {s : set α}
(hs : s ∈ f) (hg : 𝓟 (g s) ≤ h) : f.lift' g ≤ h :=
lift_le hs hg
lemma lift'_mono (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hh : h₁ ≤ h₂) : f₁.lift' h₁ ≤ f₂.lift' h₂ :=
lift_mono hf $ assume s, principal_mono.mpr $ hh s
lemma lift'_mono' (hh : ∀s∈f, h₁ s ⊆ h₂ s) : f.lift' h₁ ≤ f.lift' h₂ :=
infi₂_mono $ λ s hs, principal_mono.mpr $ hh s hs
lemma lift'_cong (hh : ∀s∈f, h₁ s = h₂ s) : f.lift' h₁ = f.lift' h₂ :=
le_antisymm (lift'_mono' $ assume s hs, le_of_eq $ hh s hs)
(lift'_mono' $ assume s hs, le_of_eq $ (hh s hs).symm)
lemma map_lift'_eq {m : β → γ} (hh : monotone h) : map m (f.lift' h) = f.lift' (image m ∘ h) :=
calc map m (f.lift' h) = f.lift (map m ∘ 𝓟 ∘ h) :
map_lift_eq $ monotone_principal.comp hh
... = f.lift' (image m ∘ h) : by simp only [(∘), filter.lift', map_principal, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma map_lift'_eq2 {g : set β → set γ} {m : α → β} (hg : monotone g) :
(map m f).lift' g = f.lift' (g ∘ image m) :=
map_lift_eq2 $ monotone_principal.comp hg
theorem comap_lift'_eq {m : γ → β} (hh : monotone h) :
comap m (f.lift' h) = f.lift' (preimage m ∘ h) :=
calc comap m (f.lift' h) = f.lift (comap m ∘ 𝓟 ∘ h) :
comap_lift_eq $ monotone_principal.comp hh
... = f.lift' (preimage m ∘ h) :
by simp only [(∘), filter.lift', comap_principal, eq_self_iff_true]
theorem comap_lift'_eq2 {m : β → α} {g : set β → set γ} (hg : monotone g) :
(comap m f).lift' g = f.lift' (g ∘ preimage m) :=
comap_lift_eq2 $ monotone_principal.comp hg
lemma lift'_principal {s : set α} (hh : monotone h) :
(𝓟 s).lift' h = 𝓟 (h s) :=
lift_principal $ monotone_principal.comp hh
lemma lift'_pure {a : α} (hh : monotone h) :
(pure a : filter α).lift' h = 𝓟 (h {a}) :=
by rw [← principal_singleton, lift'_principal hh]
lemma lift'_bot (hh : monotone h) : (⊥ : filter α).lift' h = 𝓟 (h ∅) :=
by rw [← principal_empty, lift'_principal hh]
lemma principal_le_lift' {t : set β} (hh : ∀s∈f, t ⊆ h s) :
𝓟 t ≤ f.lift' h :=
le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, principal_mono.mpr (hh s hs)
theorem monotone_lift' [preorder γ] {f : γ → filter α} {g : γ → set α → set β}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λc, (f c).lift' (g c)) :=
assume a b h, lift'_mono (hf h) (hg h)
lemma lift_lift'_assoc {g : set α → set β} {h : set β → filter γ}
(hg : monotone g) (hh : monotone h) :
(f.lift' g).lift h = f.lift (λs, h (g s)) :=
calc (f.lift' g).lift h = f.lift (λs, (𝓟 (g s)).lift h) :
lift_assoc (monotone_principal.comp hg)
... = f.lift (λs, h (g s)) : by simp only [lift_principal, hh, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma lift'_lift'_assoc {g : set α → set β} {h : set β → set γ}
(hg : monotone g) (hh : monotone h) :
(f.lift' g).lift' h = f.lift' (λs, h (g s)) :=
lift_lift'_assoc hg (monotone_principal.comp hh)
lemma lift'_lift_assoc {g : set α → filter β} {h : set β → set γ}
(hg : monotone g) : (f.lift g).lift' h = f.lift (λs, (g s).lift' h) :=
lift_assoc hg
lemma lift_lift'_same_le_lift' {g : set α → set α → set β} :
f.lift (λs, f.lift' (g s)) ≤ f.lift' (λs, g s s) :=
lift_lift_same_le_lift
lemma lift_lift'_same_eq_lift' {g : set α → set α → set β}
(hg₁ : ∀s, monotone (λt, g s t)) (hg₂ : ∀t, monotone (λs, g s t)) :
f.lift (λs, f.lift' (g s)) = f.lift' (λs, g s s) :=
lift_lift_same_eq_lift
(assume s, monotone_principal.comp (hg₁ s))
(assume t, monotone_principal.comp (hg₂ t))
lemma lift'_inf_principal_eq {h : set α → set β} {s : set β} :
f.lift' h ⊓ 𝓟 s = f.lift' (λt, h t ∩ s) :=
by simp only [filter.lift', filter.lift, (∘), ← inf_principal, infi_subtype', ← infi_inf]
lemma lift'_ne_bot_iff (hh : monotone h) : (ne_bot (f.lift' h)) ↔ (∀s∈f, (h s).nonempty) :=
calc (ne_bot (f.lift' h)) ↔ (∀s∈f, ne_bot (𝓟 (h s))) :
lift_ne_bot_iff (monotone_principal.comp hh)
... ↔ (∀s∈f, (h s).nonempty) : by simp only [principal_ne_bot_iff]
@[simp] lemma lift'_id {f : filter α} : f.lift' id = f :=
lift_principal2
lemma le_lift' {f : filter α} {h : set α → set β} {g : filter β}
(h_le : ∀s∈f, h s ∈ g) : g ≤ f.lift' h :=
le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs,
by simpa only [h_le, le_principal_iff, function.comp_app] using h_le s hs
lemma lift_infi' {f : ι → filter α} {g : set α → filter β}
[nonempty ι] (hf : directed (≥) f) (hg : monotone g) : (infi f).lift g = (⨅i, (f i).lift g) :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, lift_mono (infi_le _ _) le_rfl)
(assume s,
begin
rw mem_lift_sets hg,
simp only [exists_imp_distrib, mem_infi_of_directed hf],
exact assume t i ht hs, mem_infi_of_mem i $ mem_lift ht hs
end)
lemma lift'_infi {f : ι → filter α} {g : set α → set β}
[nonempty ι] (hg : ∀{s t}, g s ∩ g t = g (s ∩ t)) : (infi f).lift' g = (⨅i, (f i).lift' g) :=
lift_infi $ λ s t, by simp only [principal_eq_iff_eq, inf_principal, (∘), hg]
lemma lift'_inf (f g : filter α) {s : set α → set β} (hs : ∀ {t₁ t₂}, s t₁ ∩ s t₂ = s (t₁ ∩ t₂)) :
(f ⊓ g).lift' s = f.lift' s ⊓ g.lift' s :=
have (⨅ b : bool, cond b f g).lift' s = ⨅ b : bool, (cond b f g).lift' s :=
lift'_infi @hs,
by simpa only [infi_bool_eq]
theorem comap_eq_lift' {f : filter β} {m : α → β} :
comap m f = f.lift' (preimage m) :=
filter.ext $ λ s, (mem_lift'_sets monotone_preimage).symm
end lift'
section prod
variables {f : filter α}
lemma prod_def {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : f ×ᶠ g = (f.lift $ λ s, g.lift' $ λ t, s ×ˢ t) :=
have ∀(s:set α) (t : set β),
𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) = (𝓟 s).comap prod.fst ⊓ (𝓟 t).comap prod.snd,
by simp only [principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal]; intros; refl,
begin
simp only [filter.lift', function.comp, this, lift_inf, lift_const, lift_inf],
rw [← comap_lift_eq monotone_principal, ← comap_lift_eq monotone_principal],
simp only [filter.prod, lift_principal2, eq_self_iff_true]
end
lemma prod_same_eq : f ×ᶠ f = f.lift' (λ t : set α, t ×ˢ t) :=
by rw [prod_def];
from lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'
(assume s, set.monotone_prod monotone_const monotone_id)
(assume t, set.monotone_prod monotone_id monotone_const)
lemma mem_prod_same_iff {s : set (α×α)} :
s ∈ f ×ᶠ f ↔ (∃t∈f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s) :=
by rw [prod_same_eq, mem_lift'_sets]; exact set.monotone_prod monotone_id monotone_id
lemma tendsto_prod_self_iff {f : α × α → β} {x : filter α} {y : filter β} :
filter.tendsto f (x ×ᶠ x) y ↔
∀ W ∈ y, ∃ U ∈ x, ∀ (x x' : α), x ∈ U → x' ∈ U → f (x, x') ∈ W :=
by simp only [tendsto_def, mem_prod_same_iff, prod_sub_preimage_iff, exists_prop, iff_self]
variables {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*}
lemma prod_lift_lift
{f₁ : filter α₁} {f₂ : filter α₂} {g₁ : set α₁ → filter β₁} {g₂ : set α₂ → filter β₂}
(hg₁ : monotone g₁) (hg₂ : monotone g₂) :
(f₁.lift g₁) ×ᶠ (f₂.lift g₂) = f₁.lift (λs, f₂.lift (λt, g₁ s ×ᶠ g₂ t)) :=
begin
simp only [prod_def],
rw [lift_assoc],
apply congr_arg, funext x,
rw [lift_comm],
apply congr_arg, funext y,
rw [lift'_lift_assoc],
exact hg₂,
exact hg₁
end
lemma prod_lift'_lift'
{f₁ : filter α₁} {f₂ : filter α₂} {g₁ : set α₁ → set β₁} {g₂ : set α₂ → set β₂}
(hg₁ : monotone g₁) (hg₂ : monotone g₂) :
f₁.lift' g₁ ×ᶠ f₂.lift' g₂ = f₁.lift (λs, f₂.lift' (λt, g₁ s ×ˢ g₂ t)) :=
begin
rw [prod_def, lift_lift'_assoc],
apply congr_arg, funext x,
rw [lift'_lift'_assoc],
exact hg₂,
exact set.monotone_prod monotone_const monotone_id,
exact hg₁,
exact (monotone_lift' monotone_const $ monotone_lam $
assume x, set.monotone_prod monotone_id monotone_const)
end
end prod
end filter
|
fb174d094488e9434cbf80dae11a4ad41b1e412e | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /archive/100-theorems-list/16_abel_ruffini.lean | 2bdc569180ffeb0cffd2f2e08fd314a0a7c40fe4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,868 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import field_theory.abel_ruffini
import analysis.calculus.local_extr
/-!
Construction of an algebraic number that is not solvable by radicals.
The main ingredients are:
* `solvable_by_rad.is_solvable'` in `field_theory/abel_ruffini` :
an irreducible polynomial with an `is_solvable_by_rad` root has solvable Galois group
* `gal_action_hom_bijective_of_prime_degree'` in `field_theory/polynomial_galois_group` :
an irreducible polynomial of prime degree with 1-3 non-real roots has full Galois group
* `equiv.perm.not_solvable` in `group_theory/solvable` : the symmetric group is not solvable
Then all that remains is the construction of a specific polynomial satisfying the conditions of
`gal_action_hom_bijective_of_prime_degree'`, which is done in this file.
-/
namespace abel_ruffini
open function polynomial polynomial.gal ideal
local attribute [instance] splits_ℚ_ℂ
variables (R : Type*) [comm_ring R] (a b : ℕ)
/-- A quintic polynomial that we will show is irreducible -/
noncomputable def Φ : polynomial R := X ^ 5 - C ↑a * X + C ↑b
variables {R}
@[simp] lemma map_Phi {S : Type*} [comm_ring S] (f : R →+* S) : (Φ R a b).map f = Φ S a b :=
by simp [Φ]
@[simp] lemma coeff_zero_Phi : (Φ R a b).coeff 0 = ↑b :=
by simp [Φ, coeff_X_pow]
@[simp] lemma coeff_five_Phi : (Φ R a b).coeff 5 = 1 :=
by simp [Φ, coeff_X, coeff_C, -C_eq_nat_cast, -ring_hom.map_nat_cast]
variables [nontrivial R]
lemma degree_Phi : (Φ R a b).degree = ↑5 :=
begin
suffices : degree (X ^ 5 - C ↑a * X) = ↑5,
{ rwa [Φ, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt],
convert degree_C_le.trans_lt (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.mpr (nat.zero_lt_bit1 2)) },
rw degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt; rw degree_X_pow,
exact (degree_C_mul_X_le _).trans_lt (with_bot.coe_lt_coe.mpr (nat.one_lt_bit1 two_ne_zero)),
end
lemma nat_degree_Phi : (Φ R a b).nat_degree = 5 :=
nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_Phi a b)
lemma leading_coeff_Phi : (Φ R a b).leading_coeff = 1 :=
by rw [polynomial.leading_coeff, nat_degree_Phi, coeff_five_Phi]
lemma monic_Phi : (Φ R a b).monic :=
leading_coeff_Phi a b
lemma irreducible_Phi (p : ℕ) (hp : p.prime) (hpa : p ∣ a) (hpb : p ∣ b) (hp2b : ¬ p ^ 2 ∣ b) :
irreducible (Φ ℚ a b) :=
begin
rw [←map_Phi a b (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ), ←is_primitive.int.irreducible_iff_irreducible_map_cast],
apply irreducible_of_eisenstein_criterion,
{ rwa [span_singleton_prime (int.coe_nat_ne_zero.mpr hp.ne_zero), int.prime_iff_nat_abs_prime] },
{ rw [leading_coeff_Phi, mem_span_singleton],
exact_mod_cast mt nat.dvd_one.mp (hp.ne_one) },
{ intros n hn,
rw mem_span_singleton,
rw [degree_Phi, with_bot.coe_lt_coe] at hn,
interval_cases n with hn;
simp [Φ, coeff_X_pow, coeff_C, int.coe_nat_dvd.mpr, hpb, hpa, -ring_hom.eq_int_cast] },
{ simp only [degree_Phi, ←with_bot.coe_zero, with_bot.coe_lt_coe, nat.succ_pos'] },
{ rw [coeff_zero_Phi, span_singleton_pow, mem_span_singleton, int.nat_cast_eq_coe_nat],
exact mt int.coe_nat_dvd.mp hp2b },
all_goals { exact monic.is_primitive (monic_Phi a b) },
end
lemma real_roots_Phi_le : fintype.card ((Φ ℚ a b).root_set ℝ) ≤ 3 :=
begin
rw [←map_Phi a b (algebra_map ℤ ℚ), Φ, ←one_mul (X ^ 5), ←C_1],
refine (card_root_set_le_derivative _).trans
(nat.succ_le_succ ((card_root_set_le_derivative _).trans (nat.succ_le_succ _))),
suffices : ((C ((algebra_map ℤ ℚ) 20) * X ^ 3).root_set ℝ).subsingleton,
{ norm_num [fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← mul_assoc, *] at * },
rw root_set_C_mul_X_pow; norm_num,
end
lemma real_roots_Phi_ge_aux (hab : b < a) :
∃ x y : ℝ, x ≠ y ∧ aeval x (Φ ℚ a b) = 0 ∧ aeval y (Φ ℚ a b) = 0 :=
begin
let f := λ x : ℝ, aeval x (Φ ℚ a b),
have hf : f = λ x, x ^ 5 - a * x + b := by simp [f, Φ],
have hc : ∀ s : set ℝ, continuous_on f s := λ s, (Φ ℚ a b).continuous_on_aeval,
have ha : (1 : ℝ) ≤ a := nat.one_le_cast.mpr (nat.one_le_of_lt hab),
have hle : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 := zero_le_one,
have hf0 : 0 ≤ f 0 := by norm_num [hf],
by_cases hb : (1 : ℝ) - a + b < 0,
{ have hf1 : f 1 < 0 := by norm_num [hf, hb],
have hfa : 0 ≤ f a,
{ simp_rw [hf, ←sq],
refine add_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr (pow_le_pow ha _)) _; norm_num },
obtain ⟨x, ⟨-, hx1⟩, hx2⟩ := intermediate_value_Ico' hle (hc _) (set.mem_Ioc.mpr ⟨hf1, hf0⟩),
obtain ⟨y, ⟨hy1, -⟩, hy2⟩ := intermediate_value_Ioc ha (hc _) (set.mem_Ioc.mpr ⟨hf1, hfa⟩),
exact ⟨x, y, (hx1.trans hy1).ne, hx2, hy2⟩ },
{ replace hb : (b : ℝ) = a - 1 := by linarith [show (b : ℝ) + 1 ≤ a, by exact_mod_cast hab],
have hf1 : f 1 = 0 := by norm_num [hf, hb],
have hfa := calc f (-a) = a ^ 2 - a ^ 5 + b : by norm_num [hf, ← sq]
... ≤ a ^ 2 - a ^ 3 + (a - 1) : by refine add_le_add (sub_le_sub_left
(pow_le_pow ha _) _) _; linarith
... = -(a - 1) ^ 2 * (a + 1) : by ring
... ≤ 0 : by nlinarith,
have ha' := neg_nonpos.mpr (hle.trans ha),
obtain ⟨x, ⟨-, hx1⟩, hx2⟩ := intermediate_value_Icc ha' (hc _) (set.mem_Icc.mpr ⟨hfa, hf0⟩),
exact ⟨x, 1, (hx1.trans_lt zero_lt_one).ne, hx2, hf1⟩ },
end
lemma real_roots_Phi_ge (hab : b < a) : 2 ≤ fintype.card ((Φ ℚ a b).root_set ℝ) :=
begin
have q_ne_zero : Φ ℚ a b ≠ 0 := (monic_Phi a b).ne_zero,
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ := real_roots_Phi_ge_aux a b hab,
have key : ↑({x, y} : finset ℝ) ⊆ (Φ ℚ a b).root_set ℝ,
{ simp [set.insert_subset, mem_root_set q_ne_zero, hx, hy] },
convert fintype.card_le_of_embedding (set.embedding_of_subset _ _ key),
simp only [finset.coe_sort_coe, fintype.card_coe, finset.card_singleton,
finset.card_insert_of_not_mem (mt finset.mem_singleton.mp hxy)]
end
lemma complex_roots_Phi (h : (Φ ℚ a b).separable) : fintype.card ((Φ ℚ a b).root_set ℂ) = 5 :=
(card_root_set_eq_nat_degree h (is_alg_closed.splits_codomain _)).trans (nat_degree_Phi a b)
lemma gal_Phi (hab : b < a) (h_irred : irreducible (Φ ℚ a b)) :
bijective (gal_action_hom (Φ ℚ a b) ℂ) :=
begin
apply gal_action_hom_bijective_of_prime_degree' h_irred,
{ norm_num [nat_degree_Phi] },
{ rw [complex_roots_Phi a b h_irred.separable, nat.succ_le_succ_iff],
exact (real_roots_Phi_le a b).trans (nat.le_succ 3) },
{ simp_rw [complex_roots_Phi a b h_irred.separable, nat.succ_le_succ_iff],
exact real_roots_Phi_ge a b hab },
end
theorem not_solvable_by_rad (p : ℕ) (x : ℂ) (hx : aeval x (Φ ℚ a b) = 0) (hab : b < a)
(hp : p.prime) (hpa : p ∣ a) (hpb : p ∣ b) (hp2b : ¬ p ^ 2 ∣ b) :
¬ is_solvable_by_rad ℚ x :=
begin
have h_irred := irreducible_Phi a b p hp hpa hpb hp2b,
apply mt (solvable_by_rad.is_solvable' h_irred hx),
introI h,
refine equiv.perm.not_solvable _ (le_of_eq _)
(solvable_of_surjective (gal_Phi a b hab h_irred).2),
rw_mod_cast [cardinal.fintype_card, complex_roots_Phi a b h_irred.separable],
end
theorem not_solvable_by_rad' (x : ℂ) (hx : aeval x (Φ ℚ 4 2) = 0) :
¬ is_solvable_by_rad ℚ x :=
by apply not_solvable_by_rad 4 2 2 x hx; norm_num
theorem exists_not_solvable_by_rad : ∃ x : ℂ, is_algebraic ℚ x ∧ ¬ is_solvable_by_rad ℚ x :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_splits (algebra_map ℚ ℂ)
(is_alg_closed.splits_codomain (Φ ℚ 4 2))
(ne_of_eq_of_ne (degree_Phi 4 2) (mt with_bot.coe_eq_coe.mp (nat.bit1_ne_zero 2))),
exact ⟨x, ⟨Φ ℚ 4 2, (monic_Phi 4 2).ne_zero, hx⟩, not_solvable_by_rad' x hx⟩,
end
end abel_ruffini
|
f3261759d215c74f9248adc4d1be56940384d9f3 | 31f556cdeb9239ffc2fad8f905e33987ff4feab9 | /stage0/src/Lean/Data/RBMap.lean | b3c02ddb089ab304c881ab1b4a910f933c0491a1 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | tobiasgrosser/lean4 | ce0fd9cca0feba1100656679bf41f0bffdbabb71 | ebdbdc10436a4d9d6b66acf78aae7a23f5bd073f | refs/heads/master | 1,673,103,412,948 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 186,870,185 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,665,129,237,000 | 1,557,939,901,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,792 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
namespace Lean
universe u v w w'
inductive Rbcolor where
| red | black
inductive RBNode (α : Type u) (β : α → Type v) where
| leaf : RBNode α β
| node (color : Rbcolor) (lchild : RBNode α β) (key : α) (val : β key) (rchild : RBNode α β) : RBNode α β
namespace RBNode
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} {σ : Type w}
open Rbcolor Nat
def depth (f : Nat → Nat → Nat) : RBNode α β → Nat
| leaf => 0
| node _ l _ _ r => succ (f (depth f l) (depth f r))
protected def min : RBNode α β → Option (Sigma (fun k => β k))
| leaf => none
| node _ leaf k v _ => some ⟨k, v⟩
| node _ l _ _ _ => RBNode.min l
protected def max : RBNode α β → Option (Sigma (fun k => β k))
| leaf => none
| node _ _ k v leaf => some ⟨k, v⟩
| node _ _ _ _ r => RBNode.max r
@[specialize] def fold (f : σ → (k : α) → β k → σ) : (init : σ) → RBNode α β → σ
| b, leaf => b
| b, node _ l k v r => fold f (f (fold f b l) k v) r
@[specialize] def forM [Monad m] (f : (k : α) → β k → m Unit) : RBNode α β → m Unit
| leaf => pure ()
| node _ l k v r => do forM f l; f k v; forM f r
@[specialize] def foldM [Monad m] (f : σ → (k : α) → β k → m σ) : (init : σ) → RBNode α β → m σ
| b, leaf => pure b
| b, node _ l k v r => do
let b ← foldM f b l
let b ← f b k v
foldM f b r
@[inline] protected def forIn [Monad m] (as : RBNode α β) (init : σ) (f : (k : α) → β k → σ → m (ForInStep σ)) : m σ := do
let rec @[specialize] visit : RBNode α β → σ → m (ForInStep σ)
| leaf, b => return ForInStep.yield b
| node _ l k v r, b => do
match (← visit l b) with
| r@(ForInStep.done _) => return r
| ForInStep.yield b =>
match (← f k v b) with
| r@(ForInStep.done _) => return r
| ForInStep.yield b => visit r b
match (← visit as init) with
| ForInStep.done b => pure b
| ForInStep.yield b => pure b
@[specialize] def revFold (f : σ → (k : α) → β k → σ) : (init : σ) → RBNode α β → σ
| b, leaf => b
| b, node _ l k v r => revFold f (f (revFold f b r) k v) l
@[specialize] def all (p : (k : α) → β k → Bool) : RBNode α β → Bool
| leaf => true
| node _ l k v r => p k v && all p l && all p r
@[specialize] def any (p : (k : α) → β k → Bool) : RBNode α β → Bool
| leaf => false
| node _ l k v r => p k v || any p l || any p r
def singleton (k : α) (v : β k) : RBNode α β :=
node red leaf k v leaf
-- the first half of Okasaki's `balance`, concerning red-red sequences in the left child
@[inline] def balance1 : RBNode α β → (a : α) → β a → RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| node red (node red a kx vx b) ky vy c, kz, vz, d
| node red a kx vx (node red b ky vy c), kz, vz, d => node red (node black a kx vx b) ky vy (node black c kz vz d)
| a, kx, vx, b => node black a kx vx b
-- the second half, concerning red-red sequences in the right child
@[inline] def balance2 : RBNode α β → (a : α) → β a → RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| a, kx, vx, node red (node red b ky vy c) kz vz d
| a, kx, vx, node red b ky vy (node red c kz vz d) => node red (node black a kx vx b) ky vy (node black c kz vz d)
| a, kx, vx, b => node black a kx vx b
def isRed : RBNode α β → Bool
| node red .. => true
| _ => false
def isBlack : RBNode α β → Bool
| node black .. => true
| _ => false
section Insert
variable (cmp : α → α → Ordering)
@[specialize] def ins : RBNode α β → (k : α) → β k → RBNode α β
| leaf, kx, vx => node red leaf kx vx leaf
| node red a ky vy b, kx, vx =>
match cmp kx ky with
| Ordering.lt => node red (ins a kx vx) ky vy b
| Ordering.gt => node red a ky vy (ins b kx vx)
| Ordering.eq => node red a kx vx b
| node black a ky vy b, kx, vx =>
match cmp kx ky with
| Ordering.lt => balance1 (ins a kx vx) ky vy b
| Ordering.gt => balance2 a ky vy (ins b kx vx)
| Ordering.eq => node black a kx vx b
def setBlack : RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| node _ l k v r => node black l k v r
| e => e
@[specialize] def insert (t : RBNode α β) (k : α) (v : β k) : RBNode α β :=
if isRed t then setBlack (ins cmp t k v)
else ins cmp t k v
end Insert
-- Okasaki's full `balance`
def balance₃ (a : RBNode α β) (k : α) (v : β k) (d : RBNode α β) : RBNode α β :=
match a with
| node red (node red a kx vx b) ky vy c
| node red a kx vx (node red b ky vy c) => node red (node black a kx vx b) ky vy (node black c k v d)
| a => match d with
| node red b ky vy (node red c kz vz d)
| node red (node red b ky vy c) kz vz d => node red (node black a k v b) ky vy (node black c kz vz d)
| _ => node black a k v d
def setRed : RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| node _ a k v b => node red a k v b
| e => e
def balLeft : RBNode α β → (k : α) → β k → RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| node red a kx vx b, k, v, r => node red (node black a kx vx b) k v r
| l, k, v, node black a ky vy b => balance₃ l k v (node red a ky vy b)
| l, k, v, node red (node black a ky vy b) kz vz c => node red (node black l k v a) ky vy (balance₃ b kz vz (setRed c))
| l, k, v, r => node red l k v r -- unreachable
def balRight (l : RBNode α β) (k : α) (v : β k) (r : RBNode α β) : RBNode α β :=
match r with
| (node red b ky vy c) => node red l k v (node black b ky vy c)
| _ => match l with
| node black a kx vx b => balance₃ (node red a kx vx b) k v r
| node red a kx vx (node black b ky vy c) => node red (balance₃ (setRed a) kx vx b) ky vy (node black c k v r)
| _ => node red l k v r -- unreachable
-- TODO: use wellfounded recursion
partial def appendTrees : RBNode α β → RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| leaf, x => x
| x, leaf => x
| node red a kx vx b, node red c ky vy d =>
match appendTrees b c with
| node red b' kz vz c' => node red (node red a kx vx b') kz vz (node red c' ky vy d)
| bc => node red a kx vx (node red bc ky vy d)
| node black a kx vx b, node black c ky vy d =>
match appendTrees b c with
| node red b' kz vz c' => node red (node black a kx vx b') kz vz (node black c' ky vy d)
| bc => balLeft a kx vx (node black bc ky vy d)
| a, node red b kx vx c => node red (appendTrees a b) kx vx c
| node red a kx vx b, c => node red a kx vx (appendTrees b c)
section Erase
variable (cmp : α → α → Ordering)
@[specialize] def del (x : α) : RBNode α β → RBNode α β
| leaf => leaf
| node _ a y v b =>
match cmp x y with
| Ordering.lt =>
if a.isBlack then balLeft (del x a) y v b
else node red (del x a) y v b
| Ordering.gt =>
if b.isBlack then balRight a y v (del x b)
else node red a y v (del x b)
| Ordering.eq => appendTrees a b
@[specialize] def erase (x : α) (t : RBNode α β) : RBNode α β :=
let t := del cmp x t;
t.setBlack
end Erase
section Membership
variable (cmp : α → α → Ordering)
@[specialize] def findCore : RBNode α β → (k : α) → Option (Sigma (fun k => β k))
| leaf, _ => none
| node _ a ky vy b, x =>
match cmp x ky with
| Ordering.lt => findCore a x
| Ordering.gt => findCore b x
| Ordering.eq => some ⟨ky, vy⟩
@[specialize] def find {β : Type v} : RBNode α (fun _ => β) → α → Option β
| leaf, _ => none
| node _ a ky vy b, x =>
match cmp x ky with
| Ordering.lt => find a x
| Ordering.gt => find b x
| Ordering.eq => some vy
@[specialize] def lowerBound : RBNode α β → α → Option (Sigma β) → Option (Sigma β)
| leaf, _, lb => lb
| node _ a ky vy b, x, lb =>
match cmp x ky with
| Ordering.lt => lowerBound a x lb
| Ordering.gt => lowerBound b x (some ⟨ky, vy⟩)
| Ordering.eq => some ⟨ky, vy⟩
end Membership
inductive WellFormed (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : RBNode α β → Prop where
| leafWff : WellFormed cmp leaf
| insertWff {n n' : RBNode α β} {k : α} {v : β k} : WellFormed cmp n → n' = insert cmp n k v → WellFormed cmp n'
| eraseWff {n n' : RBNode α β} {k : α} : WellFormed cmp n → n' = erase cmp k n → WellFormed cmp n'
section Map
@[specialize] def mapM {α : Type v} {β γ : α → Type v} {M : Type v → Type v} [Applicative M]
(f : (a : α) → β a → M (γ a))
: RBNode α β → M (RBNode α γ)
| leaf => pure leaf
| node color lchild key val rchild =>
pure (node color · key · ·) <*> lchild.mapM f <*> f _ val <*> rchild.mapM f
@[specialize] def map {α : Type u} {β γ : α → Type v}
(f : (a : α) → β a → γ a)
: RBNode α β → RBNode α γ
| leaf => leaf
| node color lchild key val rchild => node color (lchild.map f) key (f key val) (rchild.map f)
end Map
def toArray (n : RBNode α β) : Array (Sigma β) :=
n.fold (init := ∅) fun acc k v => acc.push ⟨k,v⟩
instance : EmptyCollection (RBNode α β) := ⟨leaf⟩
end RBNode
open Lean.RBNode
/- TODO(Leo): define dRBMap -/
def RBMap (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : Type (max u v) :=
{t : RBNode α (fun _ => β) // t.WellFormed cmp }
@[inline] def mkRBMap (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : RBMap α β cmp :=
⟨leaf, WellFormed.leafWff⟩
@[inline] def RBMap.empty {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} : RBMap α β cmp :=
mkRBMap ..
instance (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : EmptyCollection (RBMap α β cmp) :=
⟨RBMap.empty⟩
instance (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : Inhabited (RBMap α β cmp) := ⟨∅⟩
namespace RBMap
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {σ : Type w} {cmp : α → α → Ordering}
def depth (f : Nat → Nat → Nat) (t : RBMap α β cmp) : Nat :=
t.val.depth f
@[inline] def fold (f : σ → α → β → σ) : (init : σ) → RBMap α β cmp → σ
| b, ⟨t, _⟩ => t.fold f b
@[inline] def revFold (f : σ → α → β → σ) : (init : σ) → RBMap α β cmp → σ
| b, ⟨t, _⟩ => t.revFold f b
@[inline] def foldM [Monad m] (f : σ → α → β → m σ) : (init : σ) → RBMap α β cmp → m σ
| b, ⟨t, _⟩ => t.foldM f b
@[inline] def forM [Monad m] (f : α → β → m PUnit) (t : RBMap α β cmp) : m PUnit :=
t.foldM (fun _ k v => f k v) ⟨⟩
@[inline] protected def forIn [Monad m] (t : RBMap α β cmp) (init : σ) (f : (α × β) → σ → m (ForInStep σ)) : m σ :=
t.val.forIn init (fun a b acc => f (a, b) acc)
instance : ForIn m (RBMap α β cmp) (α × β) where
forIn := RBMap.forIn
@[inline] def isEmpty : RBMap α β cmp → Bool
| ⟨leaf, _⟩ => true
| _ => false
@[specialize] def toList : RBMap α β cmp → List (α × β)
| ⟨t, _⟩ => t.revFold (fun ps k v => (k, v)::ps) []
/-- Returns the kv pair `(a,b)` such that `a ≤ k` for all keys in the RBMap. -/
@[inline] protected def min : RBMap α β cmp → Option (α × β)
| ⟨t, _⟩ =>
match t.min with
| some ⟨k, v⟩ => some (k, v)
| none => none
/-- Returns the kv pair `(a,b)` such that `a ≥ k` for all keys in the RBMap. -/
@[inline] protected def max : RBMap α β cmp → Option (α × β)
| ⟨t, _⟩ =>
match t.max with
| some ⟨k, v⟩ => some (k, v)
| none => none
instance [Repr α] [Repr β] : Repr (RBMap α β cmp) where
reprPrec m prec := Repr.addAppParen ("Lean.rbmapOf " ++ repr m.toList) prec
@[inline] def insert : RBMap α β cmp → α → β → RBMap α β cmp
| ⟨t, w⟩, k, v => ⟨t.insert cmp k v, WellFormed.insertWff w rfl⟩
@[inline] def erase : RBMap α β cmp → α → RBMap α β cmp
| ⟨t, w⟩, k => ⟨t.erase cmp k, WellFormed.eraseWff w rfl⟩
@[specialize] def ofList : List (α × β) → RBMap α β cmp
| [] => mkRBMap ..
| ⟨k,v⟩::xs => (ofList xs).insert k v
@[inline] def findCore? : RBMap α β cmp → α → Option (Sigma (fun (_ : α) => β))
| ⟨t, _⟩, x => t.findCore cmp x
@[inline] def find? : RBMap α β cmp → α → Option β
| ⟨t, _⟩, x => t.find cmp x
@[inline] def findD (t : RBMap α β cmp) (k : α) (v₀ : β) : β :=
(t.find? k).getD v₀
/-- (lowerBound k) retrieves the kv pair of the largest key smaller than or equal to `k`,
if it exists. -/
@[inline] def lowerBound : RBMap α β cmp → α → Option (Sigma (fun (_ : α) => β))
| ⟨t, _⟩, x => t.lowerBound cmp x none
/-- Returns true if the given key `a` is in the RBMap. -/
@[inline] def contains (t : RBMap α β cmp) (a : α) : Bool :=
(t.find? a).isSome
@[inline] def fromList (l : List (α × β)) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : RBMap α β cmp :=
l.foldl (fun r p => r.insert p.1 p.2) (mkRBMap α β cmp)
@[inline] def fromArray (l : Array (α × β)) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : RBMap α β cmp :=
l.foldl (fun r p => r.insert p.1 p.2) (mkRBMap α β cmp)
/-- Returns true if the given predicate is true for all items in the RBMap. -/
@[inline] def all : RBMap α β cmp → (α → β → Bool) → Bool
| ⟨t, _⟩, p => t.all p
/-- Returns true if the given predicate is true for any item in the RBMap. -/
@[inline] def any : RBMap α β cmp → (α → β → Bool) → Bool
| ⟨t, _⟩, p => t.any p
/-- The number of items in the RBMap. -/
def size (m : RBMap α β cmp) : Nat :=
m.fold (fun sz _ _ => sz+1) 0
def maxDepth (t : RBMap α β cmp) : Nat :=
t.val.depth Nat.max
@[inline] def min! [Inhabited α] [Inhabited β] (t : RBMap α β cmp) : α × β :=
match t.min with
| some p => p
| none => panic! "map is empty"
@[inline] def max! [Inhabited α] [Inhabited β] (t : RBMap α β cmp) : α × β :=
match t.max with
| some p => p
| none => panic! "map is empty"
/-- Attempts to find the value with key `k : α` in `t` and panics if there is no such key. -/
@[inline] def find! [Inhabited β] (t : RBMap α β cmp) (k : α) : β :=
match t.find? k with
| some b => b
| none => panic! "key is not in the map"
/-- Merges the maps `t₁` and `t₂`, if a key `a : α` exists in both,
then use `mergeFn a b₁ b₂` to produce the new merged value. -/
def mergeBy (mergeFn : α → β → β → β) (t₁ t₂ : RBMap α β cmp) : RBMap α β cmp :=
t₂.fold (init := t₁) fun t₁ a b₂ =>
t₁.insert a <|
match t₁.find? a with
| some b₁ => mergeFn a b₁ b₂
| none => b₂
/-- Intersects the maps `t₁` and `t₂` using `mergeFn a b₁ b₂` to produce the new value. -/
def intersectBy {γ : Type v₁} {δ : Type v₂} (mergeFn : α → β → γ → δ) (t₁ : RBMap α β cmp) (t₂ : RBMap α γ cmp) : RBMap α δ cmp :=
t₁.fold (init := ∅) fun acc a b₁ =>
match t₂.find? a with
| some b₂ => acc.insert a <| mergeFn a b₁ b₂
| none => acc
end RBMap
def rbmapOf {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (l : List (α × β)) (cmp : α → α → Ordering) : RBMap α β cmp :=
RBMap.fromList l cmp
|
dd21f42210ab5dd247efda4db64883472b716ccf | 22e97a5d648fc451e25a06c668dc03ac7ed7bc25 | /src/topology/algebra/module.lean | 7dba6acc2f6c95819c0e5685d32fdea188e81211 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | keeferrowan/mathlib | f2818da875dbc7780830d09bd4c526b0764a4e50 | aad2dfc40e8e6a7e258287a7c1580318e865817e | refs/heads/master | 1,661,736,426,952 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 1,590,438,032,000 | 266,892,663 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,445,835,000 | 1,590,445,835,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 36,761 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.algebra.ring
import ring_theory.algebra
import linear_algebra.projection
/-!
# Theory of topological modules and continuous linear maps.
We define classes `topological_semimodule`, `topological_module` and `topological_vector_spaces`,
as extensions of the corresponding algebraic classes where the algebraic operations are continuous.
We also define continuous linear maps, as linear maps between topological modules which are
continuous. The set of continuous linear maps between the topological `R`-modules `M` and `M₂` is
denoted by `M →L[R] M₂`.
Continuous linear equivalences are denoted by `M ≃L[R] M₂`.
## Implementation notes
Topological vector spaces are defined as an `abbreviation` for topological modules,
if the base ring is a field. This has as advantage that topological vector spaces are completely
transparent for type class inference, which means that all instances for topological modules
are immediately picked up for vector spaces as well.
A cosmetic disadvantage is that one can not extend topological vector spaces.
The solution is to extend `topological_module` instead.
-/
open filter
open_locale topological_space
universes u v w u'
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A topological semimodule, over a semiring which is also a topological space, is a
semimodule in which scalar multiplication is continuous. In applications, R will be a topological
semiring and M a topological additive semigroup, but this is not needed for the definition -/
class topological_semimodule (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] : Prop :=
(continuous_smul : continuous (λp : R × M, p.1 • p.2))
end prio
section
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] [topological_semimodule R M]
lemma continuous_smul : continuous (λp:R×M, p.1 • p.2) :=
topological_semimodule.continuous_smul
lemma continuous.smul {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {f : α → R} {g : α → M}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λp, f p • g p) :=
continuous_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma tendsto_smul {c : R} {x : M} : tendsto (λp:R×M, p.fst • p.snd) (𝓝 (c, x)) (𝓝 (c • x)) :=
continuous_smul.tendsto _
lemma filter.tendsto.smul {α : Type*} {l : filter α} {f : α → R} {g : α → M} {c : R} {x : M}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 c)) (hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 x)) : tendsto (λ a, f a • g a) l (𝓝 (c • x)) :=
tendsto_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
end
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A topological module, over a ring which is also a topological space, is a module in which
scalar multiplication is continuous. In applications, `R` will be a topological ring and `M` a
topological additive group, but this is not needed for the definition -/
class topological_module (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[ring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[module R M]
extends topological_semimodule R M : Prop
/-- A topological vector space is a topological module over a field. -/
abbreviation topological_vector_space (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[field R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] :=
topological_module R M
end prio
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*}
[ring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[module R M] [topological_module R M]
/-- Scalar multiplication by a unit is a homeomorphism from a
topological module onto itself. -/
protected def homeomorph.smul_of_unit (a : units R) : M ≃ₜ M :=
{ to_fun := λ x, (a : R) • x,
inv_fun := λ x, ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • x,
right_inv := λ x, calc (a : R) • ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • x = x :
by rw [smul_smul, units.mul_inv, one_smul],
left_inv := λ x, calc ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • (a : R) • x = x :
by rw [smul_smul, units.inv_mul, one_smul],
continuous_to_fun := continuous_const.smul continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_const.smul continuous_id }
lemma is_open_map_smul_of_unit (a : units R) : is_open_map (λ (x : M), (a : R) • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_unit a).is_open_map
lemma is_closed_map_smul_of_unit (a : units R) : is_closed_map (λ (x : M), (a : R) • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_unit a).is_closed_map
/-- If `M` is a topological module over `R` and `0` is a limit of invertible elements of `R`, then
`⊤` is the only submodule of `M` with a nonempty interior. See also
`submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior` for a `normed_space` version. -/
lemma submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior' [topological_add_monoid M]
(h : nhds_within (0:R) {x | is_unit x} ≠ ⊥)
(s : submodule R M) (hs : (interior (s:set M)).nonempty) :
s = ⊤ :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine (submodule.eq_top_iff'.2 $ λ x, _),
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds] at hy,
have : tendsto (λ c:R, y + c • x) (nhds_within 0 {x | is_unit x}) (𝓝 (y + (0:R) • x)),
from tendsto_const_nhds.add ((tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id).smul
tendsto_const_nhds),
rw [zero_smul, add_zero] at this,
rcases nonempty_of_mem_sets h (inter_mem_sets (mem_map.1 (this hy)) self_mem_nhds_within)
with ⟨_, hu, u, rfl⟩,
have hy' : y ∈ ↑s := mem_of_nhds hy,
exact (s.smul_mem_iff' _).1 ((s.add_mem_iff_right hy').1 hu)
end
end
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {a : R}
[field R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[vector_space R M] [topological_vector_space R M]
/-- Scalar multiplication by a non-zero field element is a
homeomorphism from a topological vector space onto itself. -/
protected def homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : M ≃ₜ M :=
{.. homeomorph.smul_of_unit (units.mk0 a ha)}
lemma is_open_map_smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_open_map (λ (x : M), a • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero ha).is_open_map
lemma is_closed_map_smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_closed_map (λ (x : M), a • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero ha).is_closed_map
end
/-- Continuous linear maps between modules. We only put the type classes that are necessary for the
definition, although in applications `M` and `M₂` will be topological modules over the topological
ring `R`. -/
structure continuous_linear_map
(R : Type*) [ring R]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
(M₂ : Type*) [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
[module R M] [module R M₂]
extends linear_map R M M₂ :=
(cont : continuous to_fun)
notation M ` →L[`:25 R `] ` M₂ := continuous_linear_map R M M₂
/-- Continuous linear equivalences between modules. We only put the type classes that are necessary
for the definition, although in applications `M` and `M₂` will be topological modules over the
topological ring `R`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure continuous_linear_equiv
(R : Type*) [ring R]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
(M₂ : Type*) [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
[module R M] [module R M₂]
extends linear_equiv R M M₂ :=
(continuous_to_fun : continuous to_fun)
(continuous_inv_fun : continuous inv_fun)
notation M ` ≃L[`:50 R `] ` M₂ := continuous_linear_equiv R M M₂
namespace continuous_linear_map
section general_ring
/- Properties that hold for non-necessarily commutative rings. -/
variables
{R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_group M₄]
[module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [module R M₄]
/-- Coerce continuous linear maps to linear maps. -/
instance : has_coe (M →L[R] M₂) (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨to_linear_map⟩
/-- Coerce continuous linear maps to functions. -/
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance to_fun : has_coe_to_fun $ M →L[R] M₂ := ⟨λ _, M → M₂, λ f, f⟩
protected lemma continuous (f : M →L[R] M₂) : continuous f := f.2
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : M →L[R] M₂} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; congr' 1; ext x; apply h
theorem ext_iff {f g : M →L[R] M₂} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h, by ext⟩
variables (c : R) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x y z : M)
-- make some straightforward lemmas available to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma map_zero : f (0 : M) = 0 := (to_linear_map _).map_zero
@[simp] lemma map_add : f (x + y) = f x + f y := (to_linear_map _).map_add _ _
@[simp] lemma map_sub : f (x - y) = f x - f y := (to_linear_map _).map_sub _ _
@[simp] lemma map_smul : f (c • x) = c • f x := (to_linear_map _).map_smul _ _
@[simp] lemma map_neg : f (-x) = - (f x) := (to_linear_map _).map_neg _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_coe : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (M → M₂)) = (f : M → M₂) := rfl
/-- The continuous map that is constantly zero. -/
instance: has_zero (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨⟨0, continuous_const⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply : (0 : M →L[R] M₂) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = 0 := rfl
/- no simp attribute on the next line as simp does not always simplify `0 x` to `0`
when `0` is the zero function, while it does for the zero continuous linear map,
and this is the most important property we care about. -/
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_zero' : ((0 : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = 0 := rfl
section
variables (R M)
/-- the identity map as a continuous linear map. -/
def id : M →L[R] M :=
⟨linear_map.id, continuous_id⟩
end
instance : has_one (M →L[R] M) := ⟨id R M⟩
lemma id_apply : id R M x = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id : (id R M : M →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.id := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id' : (id R M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_apply : (1 : M →L[R] M) x = x := rfl
section add
variables [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : has_add (M →L[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : (((f + g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) + g := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_add' : (((f + g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (f : M → M₂) + g := rfl
instance : has_neg (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨λ f, ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply : (-f) x = - (f x) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg : (((-f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = -(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_neg' : (((-f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = -(f : M → M₂) := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (M →L[R] M₂) :=
by { refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, ..}; intros; ext;
apply_rules [zero_add, add_assoc, add_zero, add_left_neg, add_comm] }
lemma sub_apply (x : M) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : (((f - g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) - g := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub' : (((f - g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (f : M → M₂) - g := rfl
lemma sum_apply {ι : Type*} (t : finset ι) (f : ι → M →L[R] M₂) (b : M) :
t.sum f b = t.sum (λd, f d b) :=
begin
haveI : is_add_group_hom (λ (g : M →L[R] M₂), g b) :=
{ map_add := λ f g, continuous_linear_map.add_apply f g b },
exact (finset.sum_hom t (λ g : M →L[R] M₂, g b)).symm
end
end add
@[simp] lemma sub_apply' (x : M) : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
/-- Composition of bounded linear maps. -/
def comp (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) : M →L[R] M₃ :=
⟨linear_map.comp g.to_linear_map f.to_linear_map, g.2.comp f.2⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_comp : ((h.comp f) : (M →ₗ[R] M₃)) = (h : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_comp' : ((h.comp f) : (M → M₃)) = (h : M₂ → M₃) ∘ f := rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id : f.comp (id R M) = f :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp : (id R M₂).comp f = f :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_zero : f.comp (0 : M₃ →L[R] M) = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] theorem zero_comp : (0 : M₂ →L[R] M₃).comp f = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma comp_add [topological_add_group M₂] [topological_add_group M₃]
(g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f₁ f₂ : M →L[R] M₂) :
g.comp (f₁ + f₂) = g.comp f₁ + g.comp f₂ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma add_comp [topological_add_group M₃]
(g₁ g₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) :
(g₁ + g₂).comp f = g₁.comp f + g₂.comp f :=
by { ext, simp }
theorem comp_assoc (h : M₃ →L[R] M₄) (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
instance : has_mul (M →L[R] M) := ⟨comp⟩
lemma mul_def (f g : M →L[R] M) : f * g = f.comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (f g : M →L[R] M) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g := rfl
lemma mul_apply (f g : M →L[R] M) (x : M) : (f * g) x = f (g x) := rfl
instance [topological_add_group M] : ring (M →L[R] M) :=
{ mul := (*),
one := 1,
mul_one := λ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
one_mul := λ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
mul_assoc := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
left_distrib := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, map_add _ _ _,
right_distrib := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, linear_map.add_apply _ _ _,
..continuous_linear_map.add_comm_group }
/-- The cartesian product of two bounded linear maps, as a bounded linear map. -/
protected def prod (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) : M →L[R] (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ cont := f₁.2.prod_mk f₂.2,
..f₁.to_linear_map.prod f₂.to_linear_map }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) :
(f₁.prod f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃) = linear_map.prod f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma prod_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) (x : M) :
f₁.prod f₂ x = (f₁ x, f₂ x) :=
rfl
/-- Kernel of a continuous linear map. -/
def ker (f : M →L[R] M₂) : submodule R M := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker
@[norm_cast] lemma ker_coe : (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker = f.ker := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_ker {f : M →L[R] M₂} {x} : x ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = 0 := linear_map.mem_ker
lemma is_closed_ker [t1_space M₂] : is_closed (f.ker : set M) :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.1 f.cont _ is_closed_singleton
@[simp] lemma apply_ker (x : f.ker) : f x = 0 := mem_ker.1 x.2
@[simp] lemma ker_prod (f : M →L[R] M₂) (g : M →L[R] M₃) :
ker (f.prod g) = ker f ⊓ ker g :=
linear_map.ker_prod f g
/-- Range of a continuous linear map. -/
def range (f : M →L[R] M₂) : submodule R M₂ := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range
lemma range_coe : (f.range : set M₂) = set.range f := linear_map.range_coe _
lemma mem_range {f : M →L[R] M₂} {y} : y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y := linear_map.mem_range
lemma range_prod_le (f : M →L[R] M₂) (g : M →L[R] M₃) :
range (f.prod g) ≤ (range f).prod (range g) :=
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range_prod_le g
lemma range_prod_eq {f : M →L[R] M₂} {g : M →L[R] M₃} (h : ker f ⊔ ker g = ⊤) :
range (f.prod g) = (range f).prod (range g) :=
linear_map.range_prod_eq h
/-- Restrict codomain of a continuous linear map. -/
def cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
M →L[R] p :=
{ cont := continuous_subtype_mk h f.continuous,
to_linear_map := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).cod_restrict p h}
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
(f.cod_restrict p h : M →ₗ[R] p) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).cod_restrict p h :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_cod_restrict_apply (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) (x) :
(f.cod_restrict p h x : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma ker_cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
ker (f.cod_restrict p h) = ker f :=
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker_cod_restrict p h
/-- Embedding of a submodule into the ambient space as a continuous linear map. -/
def subtype_val (p : submodule R M) : p →L[R] M :=
{ cont := continuous_subtype_val,
to_linear_map := p.subtype }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_subtype_val (p : submodule R M) :
(subtype_val p : p →ₗ[R] M) = p.subtype :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma subtype_val_apply (p : submodule R M) (x : p) :
(subtype_val p : p → M) x = x :=
rfl
variables (R M M₂)
/-- `prod.fst` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →L[R] M :=
{ cont := continuous_fst, to_linear_map := linear_map.fst R M M₂ }
/-- `prod.snd` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := continuous_snd, to_linear_map := linear_map.snd R M M₂ }
variables {R M M₂}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst : (fst R M M₂ : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.fst R M M₂ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst' : (fst R M M₂ : M × M₂ → M) = prod.fst := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd : (snd R M M₂ : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = linear_map.snd R M M₂ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd' : (snd R M M₂ : M × M₂ → M₂) = prod.snd := rfl
@[simp] lemma fst_prod_snd : (fst R M M₂).prod (snd R M M₂) = id R (M × M₂) := ext $ λ ⟨x, y⟩, rfl
/-- `prod.map` of two continuous linear maps. -/
def prod_map (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) →L[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
(f₁.comp (fst R M M₃)).prod (f₂.comp (snd R M M₃))
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod_map (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :
(f₁.prod_map f₂ : (M × M₃) →ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = ((f₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prod_map (f₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄)) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod_map' (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :
⇑(f₁.prod_map f₂) = prod.map f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
/-- The continuous linear map given by `(x, y) ↦ f₁ x + f₂ y`. -/
def coprod [topological_add_monoid M₃] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
(M × M₂) →L[R] M₃ :=
⟨linear_map.coprod f₁ f₂, (f₁.cont.comp continuous_fst).add (f₂.cont.comp continuous_snd)⟩
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_coprod [topological_add_monoid M₃]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
(f₁.coprod f₂ : (M × M₂) →ₗ[R] M₃) = linear_map.coprod f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coprod_apply [topological_add_monoid M₃] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x) :
f₁.coprod f₂ x = f₁ x.1 + f₂ x.2 := rfl
/-- Given a right inverse `f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M` to `f₁ : M →L[R] M₂`,
`proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h` is the projection `M →L[R] f₁.ker` along `f₂.range`. -/
def proj_ker_of_right_inverse [topological_add_group M] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M →L[R] f₁.ker :=
(id R M - f₂.comp f₁).cod_restrict f₁.ker $ λ x, by simp [h (f₁ x)]
@[simp] lemma coe_proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
(f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h x : M) = x - f₂ (f₁ x) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply_idem [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : f₁.ker) :
f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h x = x :=
subtype.coe_ext.2 $ by simp
@[simp] lemma proj_ker_of_right_inverse_comp_inv [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (y : M₂) :
f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h (f₂ y) = 0 :=
subtype.coe_ext.2 $ by simp [h y]
variables [topological_space R] [topological_module R M₂]
/-- The linear map `λ x, c x • f`. Associates to a scalar-valued linear map and an element of
`M₂` the `M₂`-valued linear map obtained by multiplying the two (a.k.a. tensoring by `M₂`) -/
def smul_right (c : M →L[R] R) (f : M₂) : M →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := c.2.smul continuous_const,
..c.to_linear_map.smul_right f }
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_apply {c : M →L[R] R} {f : M₂} {x : M} :
(smul_right c f : M → M₂) x = (c : M → R) x • f :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_one_one (c : R →L[R] M₂) : smul_right 1 ((c : R → M₂) 1) = c :=
by ext; simp [-continuous_linear_map.map_smul, (continuous_linear_map.map_smul _ _ _).symm]
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_one_eq_iff {f f' : M₂} :
smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f = smul_right 1 f' ↔ f = f' :=
⟨λ h, have (smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f : R → M₂) 1 = (smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f' : R → M₂) 1,
by rw h,
by simp at this; assumption,
by cc⟩
lemma smul_right_comp [topological_module R R] {x : M₂} {c : R} :
(smul_right 1 x : R →L[R] M₂).comp (smul_right 1 c : R →L[R] R) = smul_right 1 (c • x) :=
by { ext, simp [mul_smul] }
lemma smul_right_one_pow [topological_add_group R] [topological_module R R] (c : R) (n : ℕ) :
(smul_right 1 c : R →L[R] R)^n = smul_right 1 (c^n) :=
begin
induction n with n ihn,
{ ext, simp },
{ rw [pow_succ, ihn, mul_def, smul_right_comp, smul_eq_mul, pow_succ'] }
end
end general_ring
section comm_ring
variables
{R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [topological_space R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
[module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [topological_module R M₃]
instance : has_scalar R (M →L[R] M₃) :=
⟨λ c f, ⟨c • f, continuous_const.smul f.2⟩⟩
variables (c : R) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (x y z : M)
@[simp] lemma smul_comp : (c • h).comp f = c • (h.comp f) := rfl
variable [topological_module R M₂]
@[simp] lemma smul_apply : (c • f) x = c • (f x) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_apply : (((c • f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = c • (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_apply' : (((c • f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = c • (f : M → M₂) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_smul : h.comp (c • f) = c • (h.comp f) := by { ext, simp }
variable [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : module R (M →L[R] M₂) :=
{ smul_zero := λ _, ext $ λ _, smul_zero _,
zero_smul := λ _, ext $ λ _, zero_smul _ _,
one_smul := λ _, ext $ λ _, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, mul_smul _ _ _,
add_smul := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, add_smul _ _ _,
smul_add := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, smul_add _ _ _ }
instance : algebra R (M₂ →L[R] M₂) :=
algebra.of_semimodule' (λ c f, ext $ λ x, rfl) (λ c f, ext $ λ x, f.map_smul c x)
end comm_ring
end continuous_linear_map
namespace continuous_linear_equiv
variables {R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_group M₄]
[module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [module R M₄]
/-- A continuous linear equivalence induces a continuous linear map. -/
def to_continuous_linear_map (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := e.continuous_to_fun,
..e.to_linear_equiv.to_linear_map }
/-- Coerce continuous linear equivs to continuous linear maps. -/
instance : has_coe (M ≃L[R] M₂) (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨to_continuous_linear_map⟩
/-- Coerce continuous linear equivs to maps. -/
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M ≃L[R] M₂) := ⟨λ _, M → M₂, λ f, f⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_def_rev (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e.to_continuous_linear_map = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (b : M) : (e : M →L[R] M₂) b = e b := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_coe (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : ((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = e := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : M ≃L[R] M₂} (h : (f : M → M₂) = g) : f = g :=
begin
cases f; cases g,
simp only [],
ext x,
induction h,
refl
end
/-- A continuous linear equivalence induces a homeomorphism. -/
def to_homeomorph (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M ≃ₜ M₂ := { ..e }
-- Make some straightforward lemmas available to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma map_zero (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e (0 : M) = 0 := (e : M →L[R] M₂).map_zero
@[simp] lemma map_add (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x y : M) : e (x + y) = e x + e y :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_add x y
@[simp] lemma map_sub (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x y : M) : e (x - y) = e x - e y :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_sub x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (c : R) (x : M) : e (c • x) = c • (e x) :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_smul c x
@[simp] lemma map_neg (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x : M) : e (-x) = -e x := (e : M →L[R] M₂).map_neg x
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_iff (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x : M} : e x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
e.to_linear_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff
protected lemma continuous (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : continuous (e : M → M₂) :=
e.continuous_to_fun
protected lemma continuous_on (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {s : set M} : continuous_on (e : M → M₂) s :=
e.continuous.continuous_on
protected lemma continuous_at (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x : M} : continuous_at (e : M → M₂) x :=
e.continuous.continuous_at
protected lemma continuous_within_at (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {s : set M} {x : M} :
continuous_within_at (e : M → M₂) s x :=
e.continuous.continuous_within_at
lemma comp_continuous_on_iff
{α : Type*} [topological_space α] (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (f : α → M) (s : set α) :
continuous_on (e ∘ f) s ↔ continuous_on f s :=
e.to_homeomorph.comp_continuous_on_iff _ _
lemma comp_continuous_iff
{α : Type*} [topological_space α] (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (f : α → M) :
continuous (e ∘ f) ↔ continuous f :=
e.to_homeomorph.comp_continuous_iff _
/-- An extensionality lemma for `R ≃L[R] M`. -/
lemma ext₁ [topological_space R] {f g : R ≃L[R] M} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
ext $ funext $ λ x, mul_one x ▸ by rw [← smul_eq_mul, map_smul, h, map_smul]
section
variables (R M)
/-- The identity map as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[refl] protected def refl : M ≃L[R] M :=
{ continuous_to_fun := continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_id,
.. linear_equiv.refl R M }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_refl :
(continuous_linear_equiv.refl R M : M →L[R] M) = continuous_linear_map.id R M := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_refl' :
(continuous_linear_equiv.refl R M : M → M) = id := rfl
/-- The inverse of a continuous linear equivalence as a continuous linear equivalence-/
@[symm] protected def symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M₂ ≃L[R] M :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.continuous_inv_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e.continuous_to_fun,
.. e.to_linear_equiv.symm }
@[simp] lemma symm_to_linear_equiv (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
e.symm.to_linear_equiv = e.to_linear_equiv.symm :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- The composition of two continuous linear equivalences as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[trans] protected def trans (e₁ : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃L[R] M₃) : M ≃L[R] M₃ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e₂.continuous_to_fun.comp e₁.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e₁.continuous_inv_fun.comp e₂.continuous_inv_fun,
.. e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv }
@[simp] lemma trans_to_linear_equiv (e₁ : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃L[R] M₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).to_linear_equiv = e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- Product of two continuous linear equivalences. The map comes from `equiv.prod_congr`. -/
def prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) ≃L[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.continuous_to_fun.prod_map e'.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e.continuous_inv_fun.prod_map e'.continuous_inv_fun,
.. e.to_linear_equiv.prod e'.to_linear_equiv }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma prod_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (x) :
e.prod e' x = (e x.1, e' x.2) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) :
(e.prod e' : (M × M₃) →L[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = (e : M →L[R] M₂).prod_map (e' : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :=
rfl
variables [topological_add_group M₄]
/-- Equivalence given by a block lower diagonal matrix. `e` and `e'` are diagonal square blocks,
and `f` is a rectangular block below the diagonal. -/
def skew_prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) :
(M × M₃) ≃L[R] M₂ × M₄ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := (e.continuous_to_fun.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
((e'.continuous_to_fun.comp continuous_snd).add $ f.continuous.comp continuous_fst),
continuous_inv_fun := (e.continuous_inv_fun.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
(e'.continuous_inv_fun.comp $ continuous_snd.sub $ f.continuous.comp $
e.continuous_inv_fun.comp continuous_fst),
.. e.to_linear_equiv.skew_prod e'.to_linear_equiv ↑f }
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) (x) :
e.skew_prod e' f x = (e x.1, e' x.2 + f x.1) := rfl
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) (x) :
(e.skew_prod e' f).symm x = (e.symm x.1, e'.symm (x.2 - f (e.symm x.1))) := rfl
theorem bijective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.bijective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.bijective
theorem injective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.injective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.injective
theorem surjective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.surjective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.surjective
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (c : M₂) : e (e.symm c) = c := e.1.6 c
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (b : M) : e.symm (e b) = b := e.1.5 b
@[simp] theorem coe_comp_coe_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e : M →L[R] M₂).comp (e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) = continuous_linear_map.id R M₂ :=
continuous_linear_map.ext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem coe_symm_comp_coe (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M).comp (e : M →L[R] M₂) = continuous_linear_map.id R M :=
continuous_linear_map.ext e.symm_apply_apply
lemma symm_comp_self (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e.symm : M₂ → M) ∘ (e : M → M₂) = id :=
by{ ext x, exact symm_apply_apply e x }
lemma self_comp_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e : M → M₂) ∘ (e.symm : M₂ → M) = id :=
by{ ext x, exact apply_symm_apply e x }
@[simp] lemma symm_comp_self' (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
((e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) : M₂ → M) ∘ ((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = id :=
symm_comp_self e
@[simp] lemma self_comp_symm' (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) ∘ ((e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) : M₂ → M) = id :=
self_comp_symm e
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e.symm.symm = e :=
by { ext x, refl }
theorem symm_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x : M) : e.symm.symm x = e x :=
rfl
lemma symm_apply_eq (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
e.to_linear_equiv.symm_apply_eq
lemma eq_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
e.to_linear_equiv.eq_symm_apply
/-- Create a `continuous_linear_equiv` from two `continuous_linear_map`s that are
inverse of each other. -/
def equiv_of_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h₁ : function.left_inverse f₂ f₁)
(h₂ : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M ≃L[R] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f₁,
continuous_to_fun := f₁.continuous,
inv_fun := f₂,
continuous_inv_fun := f₂.continuous,
left_inv := h₁,
right_inv := h₂,
.. f₁ }
@[simp] lemma equiv_of_inverse_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ h₁ h₂ x) :
equiv_of_inverse f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ x = f₁ x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_equiv_of_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ h₁ h₂) :
(equiv_of_inverse f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂).symm = equiv_of_inverse f₂ f₁ h₂ h₁ :=
rfl
section
variables (R) [topological_space R] [topological_module R R]
/-- Continuous linear equivalences `R ≃L[R] R` are enumerated by `units R`. -/
def units_equiv_aut : units R ≃ (R ≃L[R] R) :=
{ to_fun := λ u, equiv_of_inverse
(continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 ↑u)
(continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 ↑u⁻¹)
(λ x, by simp) (λ x, by simp),
inv_fun := λ e, ⟨e 1, e.symm 1,
by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, symm_apply_apply],
by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, apply_symm_apply]⟩,
left_inv := λ u, units.ext $ by simp,
right_inv := λ e, ext₁ $ by simp }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_apply (u : units R) (x : R) : units_equiv_aut R u x = x * u := rfl
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_apply_symm (u : units R) (x : R) :
(units_equiv_aut R u).symm x = x * ↑u⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_symm_apply (e : R ≃L[R] R) :
↑((units_equiv_aut R).symm e) = e 1 :=
rfl
end
variables [topological_add_group M]
open continuous_linear_map (id fst snd subtype_val mem_ker)
/-- A pair of continuous linear maps such that `f₁ ∘ f₂ = id` generates a continuous
linear equivalence `e` between `M` and `M₂ × f₁.ker` such that `(e x).2 = x` for `x ∈ f₁.ker`,
`(e x).1 = f₁ x`, and `(e (f₂ y)).2 = 0`. The map is given by `e x = (f₁ x, x - f₂ (f₁ x))`. -/
def equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M ≃L[R] M₂ × f₁.ker :=
equiv_of_inverse (f₁.prod (f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h)) (f₂.coprod (subtype_val f₁.ker))
(λ x, by simp)
(λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simp [h x])
@[simp] lemma fst_equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
(equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h x).1 = f₁ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
((equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h x).2 : M) = x - f₂ (f₁ x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_of_right_inverse_symm_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (y : M₂ × f₁.ker) :
(equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h).symm y = f₂ y.1 + y.2 := rfl
end continuous_linear_equiv
namespace submodule
variables
{R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂]
open continuous_linear_map
/-- A submodule `p` is called *complemented* if there exists a continuous projection `M →ₗ[R] p`. -/
def closed_complemented (p : submodule R M) : Prop := ∃ f : M →L[R] p, ∀ x : p, f x = x
lemma closed_complemented.has_closed_complement {p : submodule R M} [t1_space p]
(h : closed_complemented p) :
∃ (q : submodule R M) (hq : is_closed (q : set M)), is_compl p q :=
exists.elim h $ λ f hf, ⟨f.ker, f.is_closed_ker, linear_map.is_compl_of_proj hf⟩
protected lemma closed_complemented.is_closed [topological_add_group M] [t1_space M]
{p : submodule R M} (h : closed_complemented p) :
is_closed (p : set M) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨f, hf⟩,
have : ker (id R M - (subtype_val p).comp f) = p := linear_map.ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj hf,
exact this ▸ (is_closed_ker _)
end
@[simp] lemma closed_complemented_bot : closed_complemented (⊥ : submodule R M) :=
⟨0, λ x, by simp only [zero_apply, eq_zero_of_bot_submodule x]⟩
@[simp] lemma closed_complemented_top : closed_complemented (⊤ : submodule R M) :=
⟨(id R M).cod_restrict ⊤ (λ x, trivial), λ x, subtype.coe_ext.2 $ by simp⟩
end submodule
lemma continuous_linear_map.closed_complemented_ker_of_right_inverse {R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
[topological_add_group M] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
f₁.ker.closed_complemented :=
⟨f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h, f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply_idem f₂ h⟩
|
0291cea03604210eceb6a24354009a06b1b92c62 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /test/norm_num.lean | 97dba721cd51bb5b3621974af0441815f4826877 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,598 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Simon Hudon All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import tactic.norm_num
import algebra.ring.pi
/-!
# Tests for `norm_num` extensions
-/
constant real : Type
notation `ℝ` := real
@[instance] constant real.linear_ordered_ring : linear_ordered_field ℝ
constant complex : Type
notation `ℂ` := complex
@[instance] constant complex.field : field ℂ
@[instance] constant complex.char_zero : char_zero ℂ
example : 374 + (32 - (2 * 8123) : ℤ) - 61 * 50 = 86 + 32 * 32 - 4 * 5000
∧ 43 ≤ 74 + (33 : ℤ) := by norm_num
example : ¬ (7-2)/(2*3) ≥ (1:ℝ) + 2/(3^2) := by norm_num
example : (6:real) + 9 = 15 := by norm_num
example : (2:real)/4 + 4 = 3*3/2 := by norm_num
example : (((3:real)/4)-12)<6 := by norm_num
example : (5:real) ≠ 8 := by norm_num
example : (10:real) > 7 := by norm_num
example : (2:real) * 2 + 3 = 7 := by norm_num
example : (6:real) < 10 := by norm_num
example : (7:real)/2 > 3 := by norm_num
example : (4:real)⁻¹ < 1 := by norm_num
example : ((1:real) / 2)⁻¹ = 2 := by norm_num
example : 2 ^ 17 - 1 = 131071 :=
by {norm_num, tactic.try_for 200 (tactic.result >>= tactic.type_check)}
example : (3 : real) ^ (-2 : ℤ) = 1/9 := by norm_num
example : (3 : real) ^ (-2 : ℤ) = 1/9 := by norm_num1
example : (-3 : real) ^ (0 : ℤ) = 1 := by norm_num
example : (-3 : real) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = -1/3 := by norm_num
example : (-3 : real) ^ (2 : ℤ) = 9 := by norm_num
example : (1:complex) ≠ 2 := by norm_num
example : (1:complex) / 3 ≠ 2 / 7 := by norm_num
example : (1:real) ≠ 2 := by norm_num
example {α} [semiring α] [char_zero α] : (1:α) ≠ 2 := by norm_num
example {α} [ring α] [char_zero α] : (-1:α) ≠ 2 := by norm_num
example {α} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] : (-1:α) ≠ 2 := by norm_num
example {α} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] : (1:α) / 3 ≠ 2 / 7 := by norm_num
example {α} [division_ring α] [char_zero α] : (1:α) / 3 ≠ 0 := by norm_num
example : (5 / 2:ℕ) = 2 := by norm_num
example : (5 / -2:ℤ) < -1 := by norm_num
example : (0 + 1) / 2 < 0 + 1 := by norm_num
example : nat.succ (nat.succ (2 ^ 3)) = 10 := by norm_num
example : 10 = (-1 : ℤ) % 11 := by norm_num
example : (12321 - 2 : ℤ) = 12319 := by norm_num
example : (63:ℚ) ≥ 5 := by norm_num
example : nat.zero.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ % 4 = 2 := by norm_num1
example (x : ℤ) (h : 1000 + 2000 < x) : 100 * 30 < x :=
by norm_num at *; try_for 100 {exact h}
example : (1103 : ℤ) ≤ (2102 : ℤ) := by norm_num
example : (110474 : ℤ) ≤ (210485 : ℤ) := by norm_num
example : (11047462383473829263 : ℤ) ≤ (21048574677772382462 : ℤ) := by norm_num
example : (210485742382937847263 : ℤ) ≤ (1104857462382937847262 : ℤ) := by norm_num
example : (210485987642382937847263 : ℕ) ≤ (11048512347462382937847262 : ℕ) := by norm_num
example : (210485987642382937847263 : ℚ) ≤ (11048512347462382937847262 : ℚ) := by norm_num
example : (2 * 12868 + 25705) * 11621 ^ 2 ≤ 23235 ^ 2 * 12868 := by norm_num
example (x : ℕ) : ℕ := begin
let n : ℕ, {apply_normed (2^32 - 71)},
exact n
end
example (a : ℚ) (h : 3⁻¹ * a = a) : true :=
begin
norm_num at h,
guard_hyp h : 1 / 3 * a = a,
trivial
end
example (h : (5 : ℤ) ∣ 2) : false := by norm_num at h
example (h : false) : false := by norm_num at h
example : true := by norm_num
example : true ∧ true := by { split, norm_num, norm_num }
example : 10 + 2 = 1 + 11 := by norm_num
example : 10 - 1 = 9 := by norm_num
example : 12 - 5 = 3 + 4 := by norm_num
example : 5 - 20 = 0 := by norm_num
example : 0 - 2 = 0 := by norm_num
example : 4 - (5 - 10) = 2 + (3 - 1) := by norm_num
example : 0 - 0 = 0 := by norm_num
example : 100 - 100 = 0 := by norm_num
example : 5 * (2 - 3) = 0 := by norm_num
example : 10 - 5 * 5 + (7 - 3) * 6 = 27 - 3 := by norm_num
def foo : ℕ := 1
@[norm_num] meta def eval_foo : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| `(foo) := pure (`(1:ℕ), `(eq.refl 1))
| _ := tactic.failed
example : foo = 1 := by norm_num
-- ordered field examples
variable {α : Type}
variable [linear_ordered_field α]
example : (-1 :α) * 1 = -1 := by norm_num
example : (-2 :α) * 1 = -2 := by norm_num
example : (-2 :α) * -1 = 2 := by norm_num
example : (-2 :α) * -2 = 4 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) * 0 = 0 := by norm_num
example : ((1 : α) + 1) * 5 = 6 + 4 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) = 0 + 1 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) = 1 + 0 := by norm_num
example : (2 : α) = 1 + 1 := by norm_num
example : (2 : α) = 0 + 2 := by norm_num
example : (3 : α) = 1 + 2 := by norm_num
example : (3 : α) = 2 + 1 := by norm_num
example : (4 : α) = 3 + 1 := by norm_num
example : (4 : α) = 2 + 2 := by norm_num
example : (5 : α) = 4 + 1 := by norm_num
example : (5 : α) = 3 + 2 := by norm_num
example : (5 : α) = 2 + 3 := by norm_num
example : (6 : α) = 0 + 6 := by norm_num
example : (6 : α) = 3 + 3 := by norm_num
example : (6 : α) = 4 + 2 := by norm_num
example : (6 : α) = 5 + 1 := by norm_num
example : (7 : α) = 4 + 3 := by norm_num
example : (7 : α) = 1 + 6 := by norm_num
example : (7 : α) = 6 + 1 := by norm_num
example : 33 = 5 + (28 : α) := by norm_num
example : (12 : α) = 0 + (2 + 3) + 7 := by norm_num
example : (105 : α) = 70 + (33 + 2) := by norm_num
example : (45000000000 : α) = 23000000000 + 22000000000 := by norm_num
example : (0 : α) - 3 = -3 := by norm_num
example : (0 : α) - 2 = -2 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) - 3 = -2 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) - 1 = 0 := by norm_num
example : (0 : α) - 3 = -3 := by norm_num
example : (0 : α) - 3 = -3 := by norm_num
example : (12 : α) - 4 - (5 + -2) = 5 := by norm_num
example : (12 : α) - 4 - (5 + -2) - 20 = -15 := by norm_num
example : (0 : α) * 0 = 0 := by norm_num
example : (0 : α) * 1 = 0 := by norm_num
example : (0 : α) * 2 = 0 := by norm_num
example : (2 : α) * 0 = 0 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) * 0 = 0 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) * 1 = 1 := by norm_num
example : (2 : α) * 1 = 2 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) * 2 = 2 := by norm_num
example : (2 : α) * 2 = 4 := by norm_num
example : (3 : α) * 2 = 6 := by norm_num
example : (2 : α) * 3 = 6 := by norm_num
example : (4 : α) * 1 = 4 := by norm_num
example : (1 : α) * 4 = 4 := by norm_num
example : (3 : α) * 3 = 9 := by norm_num
example : (3 : α) * 4 = 12 := by norm_num
example : (4 : α) * 4 = 16 := by norm_num
example : (11 : α) * 2 = 22 := by norm_num
example : (15 : α) * 6 = 90 := by norm_num
example : (123456 : α) * 123456 = 15241383936 := by norm_num
example : (4 : α) / 2 = 2 := by norm_num
example : (4 : α) / 1 = 4 := by norm_num
example : (4 : α) / 3 = 4 / 3 := by norm_num
example : (50 : α) / 5 = 10 := by norm_num
example : (1056 : α) / 1 = 1056 := by norm_num
example : (6 : α) / 4 = 3/2 := by norm_num
example : (0 : α) / 3 = 0 := by norm_num
example : (3 : α) / 0 = 0 := by norm_num
example : (9 * 9 * 9) * (12 : α) / 27 = 81 * (2 + 2) := by norm_num
example : (-2 : α) * 4 / 3 = -8 / 3 := by norm_num
example : - (-4 / 3) = 1 / (3 / (4 : α)) := by norm_num
-- user command
set_option trace.silence_norm_num_if_true true
#norm_num 1 = 1
example : 1 = 1 := by norm_num
#norm_num 2^4-1 ∣ 2^16-1
example : 2^4-1 ∣ 2^16-1 := by norm_num
#norm_num (3 : real) ^ (-2 : ℤ) = 1/9
example : (3 : real) ^ (-2 : ℤ) = 1/9 := by norm_num
section norm_num_cmd_variable
variables (x y : ℕ)
#norm_num bit0 x < bit0 (y + x) ↔ 0 < y
example : bit0 x < bit0 (y + x) ↔ 0 < y := by norm_num
#norm_num bit0 x < bit0 (y + (2^10%11 - 1) + x) ↔ 0 < y
example : bit0 x < bit0 (y + (2^10%11 - 1) + x) ↔ 0 < y := by norm_num
#norm_num bit0 x < bit0 (y + (2^10%11 - 1) + x) + 3*2-6 ↔ 0 < y
example : bit0 x < bit0 (y + (2^10%11 - 1) + x) + 3*2-6 ↔ 0 < y := by norm_num
end norm_num_cmd_variable
-- auto gen tests
example : ((25 * (1 / 1)) + (30 - 16)) = (39 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((19 * (- 2 - 3)) / 6) = (-95/6 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (3 * 28) = (-84 : α) := by norm_num
example : - - (16 / ((11 / (- - (6 * 19) + 12)) * 21)) = (96/11 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- (- 21 + 24) - - (- - (28 + (- 21 / - (16 / ((1 * 26) * ((0 * - 11) + 13))))) * 21)) =
(79209/8 : α) := by norm_num
example : (27 * (((16 + - (12 + 4)) + (22 - - 19)) - 23)) = (486 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (13 * (- 30 / ((7 / 24) + - 7))) = (-9360/161 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (0 + 20) = (-20 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- 2 - (27 + (((2 / 14) - (7 + 21)) + (16 - - - 14)))) = (-22/7 : α) := by norm_num
example : (25 + ((8 - 2) + 16)) = (47 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- - 26 / 27) = (26/27 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((((16 * (22 / 14)) - 18) / 11) + 30) = (2360/77 : α) := by norm_num
example : (((- 28 * 28) / (29 - 24)) * 24) = (-18816/5 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((- (18 - ((- - (10 + - 2) - - (23 / 5)) / 5)) - (21 * 22)) -
(((20 / - ((((19 + 18) + 15) + 3) + - 22)) + 14) / 17)) = (-394571/825 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((3 + 25) - - 4) = (32 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((1 - 0) - 22) = (-21 : α) := by norm_num
example : (((- (8 / 7) / 14) + 20) + 22) = (2054/49 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((21 / 20) - 29) = (-559/20 : α) := by norm_num
example : - - 20 = (20 : α) := by norm_num
example : (24 - (- 9 / 4)) = (105/4 : α) := by norm_num
example : (((7 / ((23 * 19) + (27 * 10))) - ((28 - - 15) * 24)) + (9 / - (10 * - 3))) =
(-1042007/1010 : α) := by norm_num
example : (26 - (- 29 + (12 / 25))) = (1363/25 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((11 * 27) / (4 - 5)) = (-297 : α) := by norm_num
example : (24 - (9 + 15)) = (0 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- 9 - - 0) = (-9 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- 10 / (30 + 10)) = (-1/4 : α) := by norm_num
example : (22 - (6 * (28 * - 8))) = (1366 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((- - 2 * (9 * - 3)) + (22 / 30)) = (-799/15 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (26 / ((3 + 7) / - (27 * (12 / - 16)))) = (-1053/20 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((- 29 / 1) + 28) = (-1 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((21 * ((10 - (((17 + 28) - - 0) + 20)) + 26)) + ((17 + - 16) * 7)) = (-602 : α) :=
by norm_num
example : (((- 5 - ((24 + - - 8) + 3)) + 20) + - 23) = (-43 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((- ((14 - 15) * (14 + 8)) + ((- (18 - 27) - 0) + 12)) - 11) = (32 : α) := by norm_num
example : (((15 / 17) * (26 / 27)) + 28) = (4414/153 : α) := by norm_num
example : (14 - ((- 16 - 3) * - (20 * 19))) = (-7206 : α) := by norm_num
example : (21 - - - (28 - (12 * 11))) = (125 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((0 + (7 + (25 + 8))) * - (11 * 27)) = (-11880 : α) := by norm_num
example : (19 * - 5) = (-95 : α) := by norm_num
example : (29 * - 8) = (-232 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((22 / 9) - 29) = (-239/9 : α) := by norm_num
example : (3 + (19 / 12)) = (55/12 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (13 + 30) = (-43 : α) := by norm_num
example : - - - (((21 * - - ((- 25 - (- (30 - 5) / (- 5 - 5))) /
(((6 + ((25 * - 13) + 22)) - 3) / 2))) / (- 3 / 10)) * (- 8 - 0)) = (-308/3 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (2 * - (- 24 * 22)) = (-1056 : α) := by norm_num
example : - - (((28 / - ((- 13 * - 5) / - (((7 - 30) / 16) + 6))) * 0) - 24) = (-24 : α) :=
by norm_num
example : ((13 + 24) - (27 / (21 * 13))) = (3358/91 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((3 / - 21) * 25) = (-25/7 : α) := by norm_num
example : (17 - (29 - 18)) = (6 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((28 / 20) * 15) = (21 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((((26 * (- (23 - 13) - 3)) / 20) / (14 - (10 + 20))) / ((16 / 6) / (16 * - (3 / 28)))) =
(-1521/2240 : α) := by norm_num
example : (46 / (- ((- 17 * 28) - 77) + 87)) = (23/320 : α) := by norm_num
example : (73 * - (67 - (74 * - - 11))) = (54531 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((8 * (25 / 9)) + 59) = (731/9 : α) := by norm_num
example : - ((59 + 85) * - 70) = (10080 : α) := by norm_num
example : (66 + (70 * 58)) = (4126 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- - 49 * 0) = (0 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((- 78 - 69) * 9) = (-1323 : α) := by norm_num
example : - - (7 - - (50 * 79)) = (3957 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (85 * (((4 * 93) * 19) * - 31)) = (18624180 : α) := by norm_num
example : (21 + (- 5 / ((74 * 85) / 45))) = (26373/1258 : α) := by norm_num
example : (42 - ((27 + 64) + 26)) = (-75 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- ((38 - - 17) + 86) - (74 + 58)) = (-273 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((29 * - (75 + - 68)) + (- 41 / 28)) = (-5725/28 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- - (40 - 11) - (68 * 86)) = (-5819 : α) := by norm_num
example : (6 + ((65 - 14) + - 89)) = (-32 : α) := by norm_num
example : (97 * - (29 * 35)) = (-98455 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (66 / 33) = (-2 : α) := by norm_num
example : - ((94 * 89) + (79 - (23 - (((- 1 / 55) + 95) * (28 - (54 / - - - 22)))))) =
(-1369070/121 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- 23 + 61) = (38 : α) := by norm_num
example : - (93 / 69) = (-31/23 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- - ((68 / (39 + (((45 * - (59 - (37 + 35))) / (53 - 75)) -
- (100 + - (50 / (- 30 - 59)))))) - (69 - (23 * 30))) / (57 + 17)) = (137496481/16368578 : α) :=
by norm_num
example : (- 19 * - - (75 * - - 41)) = (-58425 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((3 / ((- 28 * 45) * (19 + ((- (- 88 - (- (- 1 + 90) + 8)) + 87) * 48)))) + 1) =
(1903019/1903020 : α) := by norm_num
example : ((- - (28 + 48) / 75) + ((- 59 - 14) - 0)) = (-5399/75 : α) := by norm_num
example : (- ((- (((66 - 86) - 36) / 94) - 3) / - - (77 / (56 - - - 79))) + 87) =
(312254/3619 : α) := by norm_num
example : 2 ^ 13 - 1 = int.of_nat 8191 := by norm_num
example : 1 + 1 = 2 := by success_if_fail { norm_num [this_doesnt_exist] }; refl
-- `^` and `•` do not have to match `monoid.has_pow` and `add_monoid.has_smul` syntactically
example {α} [ring α] : (2 ^ 3 : ℕ → α) = 8 := by norm_num
example {α} [ring α] : (2 • 3 : ℕ → α) = 6 := by norm_num
/-! Test the behaviour of removing one `norm_num` extension tactic. -/
section remove_extension
-- turn off the `norm_num` extension which deals with `/`, `%`, `∣`
local attribute [-norm_num] norm_num.eval_nat_int_ext
example : (5 / 2:ℕ) = 2 := by success_if_fail { solve1 { norm_num } }; refl
example : 10 = (-1 : ℤ) % 11 := by success_if_fail { solve1 { norm_num } }; refl
example (h : (5 : ℤ) ∣ 2) : false :=
begin
success_if_fail { norm_num at h },
have : (2:ℤ) ≠ 0 := by norm_num,
exact this (int.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h),
end
example : 2^4-1 ∣ 2^16-1 :=
begin
success_if_fail { solve1 { norm_num } },
use 4369,
norm_num,
end
end remove_extension
|
c6c7bcba183414137ceb35891acb3a3bb2ea263c | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/data/pfun.lean | 9d27724a938f8bff42e644ce37816eb239a866b9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,646 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import data.rel
/-- `roption α` is the type of "partial values" of type `α`. It
is similar to `option α` except the domain condition can be an
arbitrary proposition, not necessarily decidable. -/
structure {u} roption (α : Type u) : Type u :=
(dom : Prop)
(get : dom → α)
namespace roption
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Convert an `roption α` with a decidable domain to an option -/
def to_option (o : roption α) [decidable o.dom] : option α :=
if h : dom o then some (o.get h) else none
/-- `roption` extensionality -/
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : roption α}
(H1 : o.dom ↔ p.dom)
(H2 : ∀h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂), o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩ ⟨pd, p⟩ H1 H2 := have t : od = pd, from propext H1,
by cases t; rw [show o = p, from funext $ λp, H2 p p]
/-- `roption` eta expansion -/
@[simp] theorem eta : Π (o : roption α), (⟨o.dom, λ h, o.get h⟩ : roption α) = o
| ⟨h, f⟩ := rfl
/-- `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a` -/
protected def mem (a : α) (o : roption α) : Prop := ∃ h, o.get h = a
instance : has_mem α (roption α) := ⟨roption.mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : roption α) : (a ∈ o) = (∃ h, o.get h = a) :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : roption α}, o.dom ↔ ∃y, y ∈ o
| ⟨p, f⟩ := ⟨λh, ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, λ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, h⟩
theorem get_mem {o : roption α} (h) : get o h ∈ o := ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- `roption` extensionality -/
theorem ext {o p : roption α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
ext' ⟨λ h, ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst,
λ h, ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩ $
λ a b, ((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
/-- The `none` value in `roption` has a `false` domain and an empty function. -/
def none : roption α := ⟨false, false.rec _⟩
instance : inhabited (roption α) := ⟨none⟩
@[simp] theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := λ h, h.fst
/-- The `some a` value in `roption` has a `true` domain and the
function returns `a`. -/
def some (a : α) : roption α := ⟨true, λ_, a⟩
theorem mem_unique : relator.left_unique ((∈) : α → roption α → Prop)
| _ ⟨p, f⟩ _ ⟨h₁, rfl⟩ ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ := rfl
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : roption α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
@[simp] theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).dom) : get (some a) ha = a := rfl
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a := ⟨trivial, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : roption α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨λ⟨h, e⟩, e.symm, λ e, ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : roption α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ mem_some _,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) (λ _ _, rfl)⟩
theorem eq_none_iff {o : roption α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ not_mem_none,
λ h, ext (by simpa [not_mem_none])⟩
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : roption α} : o = none ↔ ¬ o.dom :=
⟨λ e, e.symm ▸ id, λ h, eq_none_iff.2 (λ a h', h h'.fst)⟩
lemma some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none :=
by { intro h, change none.dom, rw [← h], trivial }
lemma ne_none_iff {o : roption α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃x, o = some x :=
begin
split,
{ rw [ne, eq_none_iff], intro h, push_neg at h, cases h with x hx, use x, rwa [eq_some_iff] },
{ rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩, apply some_ne_none }
end
@[simp] lemma some_inj {a b : α} : roption.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
function.injective.eq_iff (λ a b h, congr_fun (eq_of_heq (roption.mk.inj h).2) trivial)
@[simp] lemma some_get {a : roption α} (ha : a.dom) :
roption.some (roption.get a ha) = a :=
eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
lemma get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : roption α} {ha : a.dom} {b : α} :
a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨λ h, by simp [h.symm], λ h, by simp [h]⟩
instance none_decidable : decidable (@none α).dom := decidable.false
instance some_decidable (a : α) : decidable (some a).dom := decidable.true
def get_or_else (a : roption α) [decidable a.dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.dom then a.get ha else d
@[simp] lemma get_or_else_none (d : α) : get_or_else none d = d :=
dif_neg id
@[simp] lemma get_or_else_some (a : α) (d : α) : get_or_else (some a) d = a :=
dif_pos trivial
@[simp] theorem mem_to_option {o : roption α} [decidable o.dom] {a : α} :
a ∈ to_option o ↔ a ∈ o :=
begin
unfold to_option,
by_cases h : o.dom; simp [h],
{ exact ⟨λ h, ⟨_, h⟩, λ ⟨_, h⟩, h⟩ },
{ exact mt Exists.fst h }
end
/-- Convert an `option α` into an `roption α` -/
def of_option : option α → roption α
| option.none := none
| (option.some a) := some a
@[simp] theorem mem_of_option {a : α} : ∀ {o : option α}, a ∈ of_option o ↔ a ∈ o
| option.none := ⟨λ h, h.fst.elim, λ h, option.no_confusion h⟩
| (option.some b) := ⟨λ h, congr_arg option.some h.snd,
λ h, ⟨trivial, option.some.inj h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem of_option_dom {α} : ∀ (o : option α), (of_option o).dom ↔ o.is_some
| option.none := by simp [of_option, none]
| (option.some a) := by simp [of_option]
theorem of_option_eq_get {α} (o : option α) : of_option o = ⟨_, @option.get _ o⟩ :=
roption.ext' (of_option_dom o) $ λ h₁ h₂, by cases o; [cases h₁, refl]
instance : has_coe (option α) (roption α) := ⟨of_option⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : option α} :
a ∈ (o : roption α) ↔ a ∈ o := mem_of_option
@[simp] theorem coe_none : (@option.none α : roption α) = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_some (a : α) : (option.some a : roption α) = some a := rfl
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma induction_on {P : roption α → Prop}
(a : roption α) (hnone : P none) (hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(classical.em a.dom).elim
(λ h, roption.some_get h ▸ hsome _)
(λ h, (eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone)
instance of_option_decidable : ∀ o : option α, decidable (of_option o).dom
| option.none := roption.none_decidable
| (option.some a) := roption.some_decidable a
@[simp] theorem to_of_option (o : option α) : to_option (of_option o) = o :=
by cases o; refl
@[simp] theorem of_to_option (o : roption α) [decidable o.dom] : of_option (to_option o) = o :=
ext $ λ a, mem_of_option.trans mem_to_option
noncomputable def equiv_option : roption α ≃ option α :=
by haveI := classical.dec; exact
⟨λ o, to_option o, of_option, λ o, of_to_option o,
λ o, eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_of_option o)⟩
/-- `assert p f` is a bind-like operation which appends an additional condition
`p` to the domain and uses `f` to produce the value. -/
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → roption α) : roption α :=
⟨∃h : p, (f h).dom, λha, (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
/-- The bind operation has value `g (f.get)`, and is defined when all the
parts are defined. -/
protected def bind (f : roption α) (g : α → roption β) : roption β :=
assert (dom f) (λb, g (f.get b))
/-- The map operation for `roption` just maps the value and maintains the same domain. -/
def map (f : α → β) (o : roption α) : roption β :=
⟨o.dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : roption α} :
∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _ ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : roption α} {b} :
b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨match b with _, ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
@[simp] theorem map_none (f : α → β) :
map f none = none := eq_none_iff.2 $ λ a, by simp
@[simp] theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 $ mem_map f $ mem_some _
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → roption α}
: ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _ x ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → roption α} {a} :
a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨match a with _, ⟨h, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h⟩, mem_assert _ h⟩
theorem mem_bind {f : roption α} {g : α → roption β} :
∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _ _ ⟨h, rfl⟩ ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_bind_iff {f : roption α} {g : α → roption β} {b} :
b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨match b with _, ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩ := ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩ end,
λ ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
@[simp] theorem bind_none (f : α → roption β) :
none.bind f = none := eq_none_iff.2 $ λ a, by simp
@[simp] theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → roption β) :
(some a).bind f = f a := ext $ by simp
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : roption α) :
x.bind (some ∘ f) = map f x :=
ext $ by simp [eq_comm]
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : roption α) (g : α → roption β) (k : β → roption γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind (λ x, (g x).bind k) :=
ext $ λ a, by simp; exact
⟨λ ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
λ ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩, ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → roption γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind (λ y, g (f y)) :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
@[simp] theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → roption β) (x : roption α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind (λ y, map g (f y)) :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : roption α) :
map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o :=
by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_map, bind_some_eq_map]
instance : monad roption :=
{ pure := @some,
map := @map,
bind := @roption.bind }
instance : is_lawful_monad roption :=
{ bind_pure_comp_eq_map := @bind_some_eq_map,
id_map := λ β f, by cases f; refl,
pure_bind := @bind_some,
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc }
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ (x : α), f x = x) (o) : map f o = o :=
by rw [show f = id, from funext H]; exact id_map o
@[simp] theorem bind_some_right (x : roption α) : x.bind some = x :=
by rw [bind_some_eq_map]; simp [map_id']
@[simp] theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a := rfl
@[simp] theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : return a = some a := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : roption α) :
f <$> o = map f o := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : roption α) (g : α → roption β) :
f >>= g = f.bind g := rfl
instance : monad_fail roption :=
{ fail := λ_ _, none, ..roption.monad }
/- `restrict p o h` replaces the domain of `o` with `p`, and is well defined when
`p` implies `o` is defined. -/
def restrict (p : Prop) : ∀ (o : roption α), (p → o.dom) → roption α
| ⟨d, f⟩ H := ⟨p, λh, f (H h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : roption α) (h : p → o.dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o :=
begin
cases o, dsimp [restrict, mem_eq], split,
{ rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩, exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩ },
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, h₂⟩, exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
end
/-- `unwrap o` gets the value at `o`, ignoring the condition.
(This function is unsound.) -/
meta def unwrap (o : roption α) : α := o.get undefined
theorem assert_defined {p : Prop} {f : p → roption α} :
∀ (h : p), (f h).dom → (assert p f).dom := exists.intro
theorem bind_defined {f : roption α} {g : α → roption β} :
∀ (h : f.dom), (g (f.get h)).dom → (f.bind g).dom := assert_defined
@[simp] theorem bind_dom {f : roption α} {g : α → roption β} :
(f.bind g).dom ↔ ∃ h : f.dom, (g (f.get h)).dom := iff.rfl
end roption
/-- `pfun α β`, or `α →. β`, is the type of partial functions from
`α` to `β`. It is defined as `α → roption β`. -/
def pfun (α : Type*) (β : Type*) := α → roption β
infixr ` →. `:25 := pfun
namespace pfun
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
instance : inhabited (α →. β) := ⟨λ a, roption.none⟩
/-- The domain of a partial function -/
def dom (f : α →. β) : set α := λ a, (f a).dom
theorem mem_dom (f : α →. β) (x : α) : x ∈ dom f ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ f x :=
by simp [dom, set.mem_def, roption.dom_iff_mem]
theorem dom_eq (f : α →. β) : dom f = {x | ∃ y, y ∈ f x} :=
set.ext (mem_dom f)
/-- Evaluate a partial function -/
def fn (f : α →. β) (x) (h : dom f x) : β := (f x).get h
/-- Evaluate a partial function to return an `option` -/
def eval_opt (f : α →. β) [D : decidable_pred (dom f)] (x : α) : option β :=
@roption.to_option _ _ (D x)
/-- Partial function extensionality -/
theorem ext' {f g : α →. β}
(H1 : ∀ a, a ∈ dom f ↔ a ∈ dom g)
(H2 : ∀ a p q, f.fn a p = g.fn a q) : f = g :=
funext $ λ a, roption.ext' (H1 a) (H2 a)
theorem ext {f g : α →. β} (H : ∀ a b, b ∈ f a ↔ b ∈ g a) : f = g :=
funext $ λ a, roption.ext (H a)
/-- Turn a partial function into a function out of a subtype -/
def as_subtype (f : α →. β) (s : {x // f.dom x}) : β := f.fn s.1 s.2
def equiv_subtype : (α →. β) ≃ (Σ p : α → Prop, subtype p → β) :=
⟨λ f, ⟨f.dom, as_subtype f⟩,
λ ⟨p, f⟩ x, ⟨p x, λ h, f ⟨x, h⟩⟩,
λ f, funext $ λ a, roption.eta _,
λ ⟨p, f⟩, by dsimp; congr; funext a; cases a; refl⟩
theorem as_subtype_eq_of_mem {f : α →. β} {x : α} {y : β} (fxy : y ∈ f x) (domx : x ∈ f.dom) :
f.as_subtype ⟨x, domx⟩ = y :=
roption.mem_unique (roption.get_mem _) fxy
/-- Turn a total function into a partial function -/
protected def lift (f : α → β) : α →. β := λ a, roption.some (f a)
instance : has_coe (α → β) (α →. β) := ⟨pfun.lift⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_eq_coe (f : α → β) : pfun.lift f = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_val (f : α → β) (a : α) :
(f : α →. β) a = roption.some (f a) := rfl
/-- The graph of a partial function is the set of pairs
`(x, f x)` where `x` is in the domain of `f`. -/
def graph (f : α →. β) : set (α × β) := {p | p.2 ∈ f p.1}
def graph' (f : α →. β) : rel α β := λ x y, y ∈ f x
/-- The range of a partial function is the set of values
`f x` where `x` is in the domain of `f`. -/
def ran (f : α →. β) : set β := {b | ∃a, b ∈ f a}
/-- Restrict a partial function to a smaller domain. -/
def restrict (f : α →. β) {p : set α} (H : p ⊆ f.dom) : α →. β :=
λ x, roption.restrict (p x) (f x) (@H x)
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict {f : α →. β} {s : set α} (h : s ⊆ f.dom) (a : α) (b : β) :
b ∈ restrict f h a ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ f a :=
by { simp [restrict], reflexivity }
def res (f : α → β) (s : set α) : α →. β :=
restrict (pfun.lift f) (set.subset_univ s)
theorem mem_res (f : α → β) (s : set α) (a : α) (b : β) :
b ∈ res f s a ↔ (a ∈ s ∧ f a = b) :=
by { simp [res], split; {intro h, simp [h]} }
theorem res_univ (f : α → β) : pfun.res f set.univ = f :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_graph (f : α →. β) (x : α) : x ∈ f.dom ↔ ∃y, (x, y) ∈ f.graph :=
roption.dom_iff_mem
theorem lift_graph {f : α → β} {a b} : (a, b) ∈ (f : α →. β).graph ↔ f a = b :=
show (∃ (h : true), f a = b) ↔ f a = b, by simp
/-- The monad `pure` function, the total constant `x` function -/
protected def pure (x : β) : α →. β := λ_, roption.some x
/-- The monad `bind` function, pointwise `roption.bind` -/
def bind (f : α →. β) (g : β → α →. γ) : α →. γ :=
λa, roption.bind (f a) (λb, g b a)
/-- The monad `map` function, pointwise `roption.map` -/
def map (f : β → γ) (g : α →. β) : α →. γ :=
λa, roption.map f (g a)
instance : monad (pfun α) :=
{ pure := @pfun.pure _,
bind := @pfun.bind _,
map := @pfun.map _ }
instance : is_lawful_monad (pfun α) :=
{ bind_pure_comp_eq_map := λ β γ f x, funext $ λ a, roption.bind_some_eq_map _ _,
id_map := λ β f, by funext a; dsimp [functor.map, pfun.map]; cases f a; refl,
pure_bind := λ β γ x f, funext $ λ a, roption.bind_some.{u_1 u_2} _ (f x),
bind_assoc := λ β γ δ f g k,
funext $ λ a, roption.bind_assoc (f a) (λ b, g b a) (λ b, k b a) }
theorem pure_defined (p : set α) (x : β) : p ⊆ (@pfun.pure α _ x).dom := set.subset_univ p
theorem bind_defined {α β γ} (p : set α) {f : α →. β} {g : β → α →. γ}
(H1 : p ⊆ f.dom) (H2 : ∀x, p ⊆ (g x).dom) : p ⊆ (f >>= g).dom :=
λa ha, (⟨H1 ha, H2 _ ha⟩ : (f >>= g).dom a)
def fix (f : α →. β ⊕ α) : α →. β := λ a,
roption.assert (acc (λ x y, sum.inr x ∈ f y) a) $ λ h,
@well_founded.fix_F _ (λ x y, sum.inr x ∈ f y) _
(λ a IH, roption.assert (f a).dom $ λ hf,
by cases e : (f a).get hf with b a';
[exact roption.some b, exact IH _ ⟨hf, e⟩])
a h
theorem dom_of_mem_fix {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {a : α} {b : β}
(h : b ∈ fix f a) : (f a).dom :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := roption.mem_assert_iff.1 h in
by rw well_founded.fix_F_eq at h₂; exact h₂.fst.fst
theorem mem_fix_iff {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {a : α} {b : β} :
b ∈ fix f a ↔ sum.inl b ∈ f a ∨ ∃ a', sum.inr a' ∈ f a ∧ b ∈ fix f a' :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := roption.mem_assert_iff.1 h in
begin
rw well_founded.fix_F_eq at h₂,
simp at h₂,
cases h₂ with h₂ h₃,
cases e : (f a).get h₂ with b' a'; simp [e] at h₃,
{ subst b', refine or.inl ⟨h₂, e⟩ },
{ exact or.inr ⟨a', ⟨_, e⟩, roption.mem_assert _ h₃⟩ }
end,
λ h, begin
simp [fix],
rcases h with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ | ⟨a', h, h₃⟩,
{ refine ⟨⟨_, λ y h', _⟩, _⟩,
{ injection roption.mem_unique ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h' },
{ rw well_founded.fix_F_eq, simp [h₁, h₂] } },
{ simp [fix] at h₃, cases h₃ with h₃ h₄,
refine ⟨⟨_, λ y h', _⟩, _⟩,
{ injection roption.mem_unique h h' with e,
exact e ▸ h₃ },
{ cases h with h₁ h₂,
rw well_founded.fix_F_eq, simp [h₁, h₂, h₄] } }
end⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator] def fix_induction
{f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {C : α → Sort*} {a : α} (h : b ∈ fix f a)
(H : ∀ a, b ∈ fix f a →
(∀ a', b ∈ fix f a' → sum.inr a' ∈ f a → C a') → C a) : C a :=
begin
replace h := roption.mem_assert_iff.1 h,
have := h.snd, revert this,
induction h.fst with a ha IH, intro h₂,
refine H a (roption.mem_assert_iff.2 ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, h₂⟩)
(λ a' ha' fa', _),
have := (roption.mem_assert_iff.1 ha').snd,
exact IH _ fa' ⟨ha _ fa', this⟩ this
end
end pfun
namespace pfun
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (f : α →. β)
def image (s : set α) : set β := rel.image f.graph' s
lemma image_def (s : set α) : image f s = {y | ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x} := rfl
lemma mem_image (y : β) (s : set α) : y ∈ image f s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x :=
iff.rfl
lemma image_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.image s ⊆ f.image t :=
rel.image_mono _ h
lemma image_inter (s t : set α) : f.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ f.image s ∩ f.image t :=
rel.image_inter _ s t
lemma image_union (s t : set α) : f.image (s ∪ t) = f.image s ∪ f.image t :=
rel.image_union _ s t
def preimage (s : set β) : set α := rel.preimage (λ x y, y ∈ f x) s
lemma preimage_def (s : set β) : preimage f s = {x | ∃ y ∈ s, y ∈ f x} := rfl
lemma mem_preimage (s : set β) (x : α) : x ∈ preimage f s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, y ∈ f x :=
iff.rfl
lemma preimage_subset_dom (s : set β) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.dom :=
assume x ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩, roption.dom_iff_mem.mpr ⟨y, fxy⟩
lemma preimage_mono {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.preimage t :=
rel.preimage_mono _ h
lemma preimage_inter (s t : set β) : f.preimage (s ∩ t) ⊆ f.preimage s ∩ f.preimage t :=
rel.preimage_inter _ s t
lemma preimage_union (s t : set β) : f.preimage (s ∪ t) = f.preimage s ∪ f.preimage t :=
rel.preimage_union _ s t
lemma preimage_univ : f.preimage set.univ = f.dom :=
by ext; simp [mem_preimage, mem_dom]
def core (s : set β) : set α := rel.core f.graph' s
lemma core_def (s : set β) : core f s = {x | ∀ y, y ∈ f x → y ∈ s} := rfl
lemma mem_core (x : α) (s : set β) : x ∈ core f s ↔ (∀ y, y ∈ f x → y ∈ s) :=
iff.rfl
lemma compl_dom_subset_core (s : set β) : f.domᶜ ⊆ f.core s :=
assume x hx y fxy,
absurd ((mem_dom f x).mpr ⟨y, fxy⟩) hx
lemma core_mono {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.core s ⊆ f.core t :=
rel.core_mono _ h
lemma core_inter (s t : set β) : f.core (s ∩ t) = f.core s ∩ f.core t :=
rel.core_inter _ s t
lemma mem_core_res (f : α → β) (s : set α) (t : set β) (x : α) :
x ∈ core (res f s) t ↔ (x ∈ s → f x ∈ t) :=
begin
simp [mem_core, mem_res], split,
{ intros h h', apply h _ h', reflexivity },
intros h y xs fxeq, rw ←fxeq, exact h xs
end
section
open_locale classical
lemma core_res (f : α → β) (s : set α) (t : set β) : core (res f s) t = sᶜ ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
by { ext, rw mem_core_res, by_cases h : x ∈ s; simp [h] }
end
lemma core_restrict (f : α → β) (s : set β) : core (f : α →. β) s = set.preimage f s :=
by ext x; simp [core_def]
lemma preimage_subset_core (f : α →. β) (s : set β) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.core s :=
assume x ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩ y' fxy',
have y = y', from roption.mem_unique fxy fxy',
this ▸ ys
lemma preimage_eq (f : α →. β) (s : set β) : f.preimage s = f.core s ∩ f.dom :=
set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
(set.subset_inter (preimage_subset_core f s) (preimage_subset_dom f s))
(assume x ⟨xcore, xdom⟩,
let y := (f x).get xdom in
have ys : y ∈ s, from xcore _ (roption.get_mem _),
show x ∈ preimage f s, from ⟨(f x).get xdom, ys, roption.get_mem _⟩)
lemma core_eq (f : α →. β) (s : set β) : f.core s = f.preimage s ∪ f.domᶜ :=
by rw [preimage_eq, set.union_distrib_right, set.union_comm (dom f), set.compl_union_self,
set.inter_univ, set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right (compl_dom_subset_core f s)]
lemma preimage_as_subtype (f : α →. β) (s : set β) :
f.as_subtype ⁻¹' s = subtype.val ⁻¹' pfun.preimage f s :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [set.mem_preimage, set.mem_set_of_eq, pfun.as_subtype, pfun.mem_preimage],
show pfun.fn f (x.val) _ ∈ s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, y ∈ f (x.val),
exact iff.intro
(assume h, ⟨_, h, roption.get_mem _⟩)
(assume ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩,
have f.fn x.val x.property ∈ f x.val := roption.get_mem _,
roption.mem_unique fxy this ▸ ys)
end
end pfun
|
3d08b4246c201bb150af490ee22546b0a522afb7 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/order/zorn.lean | e5b47dfba7d15eeccdfa171d3d2849a0fcc05936 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,294 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.set.lattice
/-!
# Chains and Zorn's lemmas
This file defines chains for an arbitrary relation and proves several formulations of Zorn's Lemma,
along with Hausdorff's Maximality Principle.
## Main declarations
* `chain c`: A chain `c` is a set of comparable elements.
* `max_chain_spec`: Hausdorff's Maximality Principle.
* `exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded`: Zorn's Lemma. Many variants are offered.
## Variants
The primary statement of Zorn's lemma is `exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded`. Then it is specialized
to particular relations:
* `(≤)` with `zorn_partial_order`
* `(⊆)` with `zorn_subset`
* `(⊇)` with `zorn_superset`
Lemma names carry modifiers:
* `₀`: Quantifies over a set, as opposed to over a type.
* `_nonempty`: Doesn't ask to prove that the empty chain is bounded and lets you give an element
that will be smaller than the maximal element found (the maximal element is no smaller than any
other element, but it can also be incomparable to some).
## How-to
This file comes across as confusing to those who haven't yet used it, so here is a detailed
walkthrough:
1. Know what relation on which type/set you're looking for. See Variants above. You can discharge
some conditions to Zorn's lemma directly using a `_nonempty` variant.
2. Write down the definition of your type/set, put a `suffices : ∃ m, ∀ a, m ≺ a → a ≺ m, { ... },`
(or whatever you actually need) followed by a `apply some_version_of_zorn`.
3. Fill in the details. This is where you start talking about chains.
A typical proof using Zorn could look like this
```lean
lemma zorny_lemma : zorny_statement :=
begin
let s : set α := {x | whatever x},
suffices : ∃ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, y ⊆ x → y = x, -- or with another operator
{ exact proof_post_zorn },
apply zorn.zorn_subset, -- or another variant
rintro c hcs hc,
obtain rfl | hcnemp := c.eq_empty_or_nonempty, -- you might need to disjunct on c empty or not
{ exact ⟨edge_case_construction,
proof_that_edge_case_construction_respects_whatever,
proof_that_edge_case_construction_contains_all_stuff_in_c⟩ },
exact ⟨construction,
proof_that_construction_respects_whatever,
proof_that_construction_contains_all_stuff_in_c⟩,
end
```
## Notes
Originally ported from Isabelle/HOL. The
[original file](https://isabelle.in.tum.de/dist/library/HOL/HOL/Zorn.html) was written by Jacques D.
Fleuriot, Tobias Nipkow, Christian Sternagel.
-/
noncomputable theory
universes u
open set classical
open_locale classical
namespace zorn
section chain
parameters {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop)
local infix ` ≺ `:50 := r
/-- A chain is a subset `c` satisfying `x ≺ y ∨ x = y ∨ y ≺ x` for all `x y ∈ c`. -/
def chain (c : set α) := pairwise_on c (λ x y, x ≺ y ∨ y ≺ x)
parameters {r}
lemma chain.total_of_refl [is_refl α r]
{c} (H : chain c) {x y} (hx : x ∈ c) (hy : y ∈ c) :
x ≺ y ∨ y ≺ x :=
if e : x = y then or.inl (e ▸ refl _) else H _ hx _ hy e
lemma chain.mono {c c'} :
c' ⊆ c → chain c → chain c' :=
pairwise_on.mono
lemma chain.directed_on [is_refl α r] {c} (H : chain c) :
directed_on (≺) c :=
λ x hx y hy,
match H.total_of_refl hx hy with
| or.inl h := ⟨y, hy, h, refl _⟩
| or.inr h := ⟨x, hx, refl _, h⟩
end
lemma chain_insert {c : set α} {a : α} (hc : chain c) (ha : ∀ b ∈ c, b ≠ a → a ≺ b ∨ b ≺ a) :
chain (insert a c) :=
forall_insert_of_forall
(λ x hx, forall_insert_of_forall (hc x hx) (λ hneq, (ha x hx hneq).symm))
(forall_insert_of_forall
(λ x hx hneq, ha x hx $ λ h', hneq h'.symm) (λ h, (h rfl).rec _))
/-- `super_chain c₁ c₂` means that `c₂` is a chain that strictly includes `c₁`. -/
def super_chain (c₁ c₂ : set α) : Prop := chain c₂ ∧ c₁ ⊂ c₂
/-- A chain `c` is a maximal chain if there does not exists a chain strictly including `c`. -/
def is_max_chain (c : set α) := chain c ∧ ¬ (∃ c', super_chain c c')
/-- Given a set `c`, if there exists a chain `c'` strictly including `c`, then `succ_chain c`
is one of these chains. Otherwise it is `c`. -/
def succ_chain (c : set α) : set α :=
if h : ∃ c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c' then some h else c
lemma succ_spec {c : set α} (h : ∃ c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c') :
super_chain c (succ_chain c) :=
let ⟨c', hc'⟩ := h in
have chain c ∧ super_chain c (some h),
from @some_spec _ (λ c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c') _,
by simp [succ_chain, dif_pos, h, this.right]
lemma chain_succ {c : set α} (hc : chain c) :
chain (succ_chain c) :=
if h : ∃ c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c' then
(succ_spec h).left
else
by simp [succ_chain, dif_neg, h]; exact hc
lemma super_of_not_max {c : set α} (hc₁ : chain c) (hc₂ : ¬ is_max_chain c) :
super_chain c (succ_chain c) :=
begin
simp [is_max_chain, not_and_distrib, not_forall_not] at hc₂,
cases hc₂.neg_resolve_left hc₁ with c' hc',
exact succ_spec ⟨c', hc₁, hc'⟩
end
lemma succ_increasing {c : set α} :
c ⊆ succ_chain c :=
if h : ∃ c', chain c ∧ super_chain c c' then
have super_chain c (succ_chain c), from succ_spec h,
this.right.left
else by simp [succ_chain, dif_neg, h, subset.refl]
/-- Set of sets reachable from `∅` using `succ_chain` and `⋃₀`. -/
inductive chain_closure : set (set α)
| succ : ∀ {s}, chain_closure s → chain_closure (succ_chain s)
| union : ∀ {s}, (∀ a ∈ s, chain_closure a) → chain_closure (⋃₀ s)
lemma chain_closure_empty :
∅ ∈ chain_closure :=
have chain_closure (⋃₀ ∅),
from chain_closure.union $ λ a h, h.rec _,
by simp at this; assumption
lemma chain_closure_closure :
⋃₀ chain_closure ∈ chain_closure :=
chain_closure.union $ λ s hs, hs
variables {c c₁ c₂ c₃ : set α}
private lemma chain_closure_succ_total_aux (hc₁ : c₁ ∈ chain_closure) (hc₂ : c₂ ∈ chain_closure)
(h : ∀ {c₃}, c₃ ∈ chain_closure → c₃ ⊆ c₂ → c₂ = c₃ ∨ succ_chain c₃ ⊆ c₂) :
c₁ ⊆ c₂ ∨ succ_chain c₂ ⊆ c₁ :=
begin
induction hc₁,
case succ : c₃ hc₃ ih {
cases ih with ih ih,
{ have h := h hc₃ ih,
cases h with h h,
{ exact or.inr (h ▸ subset.refl _) },
{ exact or.inl h } },
{ exact or.inr (subset.trans ih succ_increasing) } },
case union : s hs ih {
refine (or_iff_not_imp_right.2 $ λ hn, sUnion_subset $ λ a ha, _),
apply (ih a ha).resolve_right,
apply mt (λ h, _) hn,
exact subset.trans h (subset_sUnion_of_mem ha) }
end
private lemma chain_closure_succ_total (hc₁ : c₁ ∈ chain_closure) (hc₂ : c₂ ∈ chain_closure)
(h : c₁ ⊆ c₂) :
c₂ = c₁ ∨ succ_chain c₁ ⊆ c₂ :=
begin
induction hc₂ generalizing c₁ hc₁ h,
case succ : c₂ hc₂ ih {
have h₁ : c₁ ⊆ c₂ ∨ @succ_chain α r c₂ ⊆ c₁ :=
(chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₁ hc₂ $ λ c₁, ih),
cases h₁ with h₁ h₁,
{ have h₂ := ih hc₁ h₁,
cases h₂ with h₂ h₂,
{ exact (or.inr $ h₂ ▸ subset.refl _) },
{ exact (or.inr $ subset.trans h₂ succ_increasing) } },
{ exact (or.inl $ subset.antisymm h₁ h) } },
case union : s hs ih {
apply or.imp_left (λ h', subset.antisymm h' h),
apply classical.by_contradiction,
simp [not_or_distrib, sUnion_subset_iff, not_forall],
intros c₃ hc₃ h₁ h₂,
have h := chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₁ (hs c₃ hc₃) (λ c₄, ih _ hc₃),
cases h with h h,
{ have h' := ih c₃ hc₃ hc₁ h,
cases h' with h' h',
{ exact (h₁ $ h' ▸ subset.refl _) },
{ exact (h₂ $ subset.trans h' $ subset_sUnion_of_mem hc₃) } },
{ exact (h₁ $ subset.trans succ_increasing h) } }
end
lemma chain_closure_total (hc₁ : c₁ ∈ chain_closure) (hc₂ : c₂ ∈ chain_closure) :
c₁ ⊆ c₂ ∨ c₂ ⊆ c₁ :=
or.imp_right succ_increasing.trans $ chain_closure_succ_total_aux hc₁ hc₂ $ λ c₃ hc₃,
chain_closure_succ_total hc₃ hc₂
lemma chain_closure_succ_fixpoint (hc₁ : c₁ ∈ chain_closure) (hc₂ : c₂ ∈ chain_closure)
(h_eq : succ_chain c₂ = c₂) :
c₁ ⊆ c₂ :=
begin
induction hc₁,
case succ : c₁ hc₁ h {
exact or.elim (chain_closure_succ_total hc₁ hc₂ h)
(λ h, h ▸ h_eq.symm ▸ subset.refl c₂) id },
case union : s hs ih {
exact (sUnion_subset $ λ c₁ hc₁, ih c₁ hc₁) }
end
lemma chain_closure_succ_fixpoint_iff (hc : c ∈ chain_closure) :
succ_chain c = c ↔ c = ⋃₀ chain_closure :=
⟨λ h, (subset_sUnion_of_mem hc).antisymm
(chain_closure_succ_fixpoint chain_closure_closure hc h),
λ h,
subset.antisymm
(calc succ_chain c ⊆ ⋃₀{c : set α | c ∈ chain_closure} :
subset_sUnion_of_mem $ chain_closure.succ hc
... = c : h.symm)
succ_increasing⟩
lemma chain_chain_closure (hc : c ∈ chain_closure) :
chain c :=
begin
induction hc,
case succ : c hc h {
exact chain_succ h },
case union : s hs h {
have h : ∀ c ∈ s, zorn.chain c := h,
exact λ c₁ ⟨t₁, ht₁, (hc₁ : c₁ ∈ t₁)⟩ c₂ ⟨t₂, ht₂, (hc₂ : c₂ ∈ t₂)⟩ hneq,
have t₁ ⊆ t₂ ∨ t₂ ⊆ t₁, from chain_closure_total (hs _ ht₁) (hs _ ht₂),
or.elim this
(λ ht, h t₂ ht₂ c₁ (ht hc₁) c₂ hc₂ hneq)
(λ ht, h t₁ ht₁ c₁ hc₁ c₂ (ht hc₂) hneq) }
end
/-- An explicit maximal chain. `max_chain` is taken to be the union of all sets in `chain_closure`.
-/
def max_chain := ⋃₀ chain_closure
/-- Hausdorff's maximality principle
There exists a maximal totally ordered subset of `α`.
Note that we do not require `α` to be partially ordered by `r`. -/
theorem max_chain_spec :
is_max_chain max_chain :=
classical.by_contradiction $ λ h,
begin
obtain ⟨h₁, H⟩ := super_of_not_max (chain_chain_closure chain_closure_closure) h,
obtain ⟨h₂, h₃⟩ := ssubset_iff_subset_ne.1 H,
exact h₃ ((chain_closure_succ_fixpoint_iff chain_closure_closure).mpr rfl).symm,
end
/-- Zorn's lemma
If every chain has an upper bound, then there exists a maximal element. -/
theorem exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded (h : ∀ c, chain c → ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ c, a ≺ ub)
(trans : ∀ {a b c}, a ≺ b → b ≺ c → a ≺ c) :
∃ m, ∀ a, m ≺ a → a ≺ m :=
have ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ max_chain, a ≺ ub,
from h _ $ max_chain_spec.left,
let ⟨ub, (hub : ∀ a ∈ max_chain, a ≺ ub)⟩ := this in
⟨ub, λ a ha,
have chain (insert a max_chain),
from chain_insert max_chain_spec.left $ λ b hb _, or.inr $ trans (hub b hb) ha,
have a ∈ max_chain, from
classical.by_contradiction $ λ h : a ∉ max_chain,
max_chain_spec.right $ ⟨insert a max_chain, this, ssubset_insert h⟩,
hub a this⟩
/-- A variant of Zorn's lemma. If every nonempty chain of a nonempty type has an upper bound, then
there is a maximal element.
-/
theorem exists_maximal_of_nonempty_chains_bounded [nonempty α]
(h : ∀ c, chain c → c.nonempty → ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ c, a ≺ ub)
(trans : ∀ {a b c}, a ≺ b → b ≺ c → a ≺ c) :
∃ m, ∀ a, m ≺ a → a ≺ m :=
exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded
(λ c hc,
(eq_empty_or_nonempty c).elim
(λ h, ⟨classical.arbitrary α, λ x hx, (h ▸ hx : x ∈ (∅ : set α)).elim⟩)
(h c hc))
(λ a b c, trans)
end chain
--This lemma isn't under section `chain` because `parameters` messes up with it. Feel free to fix it
/-- This can be used to turn `zorn.chain (≥)` into `zorn.chain (≤)` and vice-versa. -/
lemma chain.symm {α : Type u} {s : set α} {q : α → α → Prop} (h : chain q s) :
chain (flip q) s :=
h.mono' (λ _ _, or.symm)
theorem zorn_partial_order {α : Type u} [partial_order α]
(h : ∀ c : set α, chain (≤) c → ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ c, a ≤ ub) :
∃ m : α, ∀ a, m ≤ a → a = m :=
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := @exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded α (≤) h (λ a b c, le_trans) in
⟨m, λ a ha, le_antisymm (hm a ha) ha⟩
theorem zorn_nonempty_partial_order {α : Type u} [partial_order α] [nonempty α]
(h : ∀ (c : set α), chain (≤) c → c.nonempty → ∃ ub, ∀ a ∈ c, a ≤ ub) :
∃ (m : α), ∀ a, m ≤ a → a = m :=
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := @exists_maximal_of_nonempty_chains_bounded α (≤) _ h (λ a b c, le_trans) in
⟨m, λ a ha, le_antisymm (hm a ha) ha⟩
theorem zorn_partial_order₀ {α : Type u} [partial_order α] (s : set α)
(ih : ∀ c ⊆ s, chain (≤) c → ∃ ub ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ c, z ≤ ub) :
∃ m ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ s, m ≤ z → z = m :=
let ⟨⟨m, hms⟩, h⟩ := @zorn_partial_order {m // m ∈ s} _
(λ c hc,
let ⟨ub, hubs, hub⟩ := ih (subtype.val '' c) (λ _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, _, h⟩, h ▸ hx)
(by { rintro _ ⟨p, hpc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨q, hqc, rfl⟩ hpq;
refine hc _ hpc _ hqc (λ t, hpq (subtype.ext_iff.1 t)) })
in ⟨⟨ub, hubs⟩, λ ⟨y, hy⟩ hc, hub _ ⟨_, hc, rfl⟩⟩)
in ⟨m, hms, λ z hzs hmz, congr_arg subtype.val (h ⟨z, hzs⟩ hmz)⟩
theorem zorn_nonempty_partial_order₀ {α : Type u} [partial_order α] (s : set α)
(ih : ∀ c ⊆ s, chain (≤) c → ∀ y ∈ c, ∃ ub ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ c, z ≤ ub) (x : α) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
∃ m ∈ s, x ≤ m ∧ ∀ z ∈ s, m ≤ z → z = m :=
let ⟨⟨m, hms, hxm⟩, h⟩ := @zorn_partial_order {m // m ∈ s ∧ x ≤ m} _
(λ c hc, c.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim
(λ hce, hce.symm ▸ ⟨⟨x, hxs, le_refl _⟩, λ _, false.elim⟩)
(λ ⟨m, hmc⟩,
let ⟨ub, hubs, hub⟩ := ih (subtype.val '' c) (image_subset_iff.2 $ λ z hzc, z.2.1)
(by rintro _ ⟨p, hpc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨q, hqc, rfl⟩ hpq;
exact hc p hpc q hqc (mt (by rintro rfl; refl) hpq)) m.1 (mem_image_of_mem _ hmc) in
⟨⟨ub, hubs, le_trans m.2.2 $ hub m.1 $ mem_image_of_mem _ hmc⟩,
λ a hac, hub a.1 ⟨a, hac, rfl⟩⟩)) in
⟨m, hms, hxm, λ z hzs hmz, congr_arg subtype.val $ h ⟨z, hzs, le_trans hxm hmz⟩ hmz⟩
theorem zorn_subset {α : Type u} (S : set (set α))
(h : ∀ c ⊆ S, chain (⊆) c → ∃ ub ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, s ⊆ ub) :
∃ m ∈ S, ∀ a ∈ S, m ⊆ a → a = m :=
zorn_partial_order₀ S h
theorem zorn_subset_nonempty {α : Type u} (S : set (set α))
(H : ∀ c ⊆ S, chain (⊆) c → c.nonempty → ∃ ub ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, s ⊆ ub) (x) (hx : x ∈ S) :
∃ m ∈ S, x ⊆ m ∧ ∀ a ∈ S, m ⊆ a → a = m :=
zorn_nonempty_partial_order₀ _ (λ c cS hc y yc, H _ cS hc ⟨y, yc⟩) _ hx
theorem zorn_superset {α : Type u} (S : set (set α))
(h : ∀ c ⊆ S, chain (⊆) c → ∃ lb ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, lb ⊆ s) :
∃ m ∈ S, ∀ a ∈ S, a ⊆ m → a = m :=
@zorn_partial_order₀ (order_dual (set α)) _ S $ λ c cS hc, h c cS hc.symm
theorem zorn_superset_nonempty {α : Type u} (S : set (set α))
(H : ∀ c ⊆ S, chain (⊆) c → c.nonempty → ∃ lb ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, lb ⊆ s) (x) (hx : x ∈ S) :
∃ m ∈ S, m ⊆ x ∧ ∀ a ∈ S, a ⊆ m → a = m :=
@zorn_nonempty_partial_order₀ (order_dual (set α)) _ S (λ c cS hc y yc, H _ cS
hc.symm ⟨y, yc⟩) _ hx
lemma chain.total {α : Type u} [preorder α] {c : set α} (H : chain (≤) c) :
∀ {x y}, x ∈ c → y ∈ c → x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x :=
λ x y, H.total_of_refl
lemma chain.image {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → s (f x) (f y)) {c : set α} (hrc : chain r c) :
chain s (f '' c) :=
λ x ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ y ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩, ha₂ ▸ hb₂ ▸ λ hxy,
(hrc a ha₁ b hb₁ (mt (congr_arg f) $ hxy)).elim
(or.inl ∘ h _ _) (or.inr ∘ h _ _)
end zorn
lemma directed_of_chain {α β r} [is_refl β r] {f : α → β} {c : set α}
(h : zorn.chain (f ⁻¹'o r) c) :
directed r (λ x : {a : α // a ∈ c}, f x) :=
λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩, classical.by_cases
(λ hab : a = b, by simp only [hab, exists_prop, and_self, subtype.exists];
exact ⟨b, hb, refl _⟩)
(λ hab, (h a ha b hb hab).elim
(λ h : r (f a) (f b), ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, h, refl _⟩)
(λ h : r (f b) (f a), ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, refl _, h⟩))
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.