blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25be2d8701a07b11267fa1fc672713b2c549f5a2 | 1a2aed113dcb5f1c07ae98040953fba5e6563624 | /lean_root/src/tao_ch9.lean | e776f1d7960650a59dc9394fb5932a4453e4723f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kevindoran/lean | 61d9fb90363b04587624036136482b29e3c16ebd | 77e755095a31e3a214010eb48a61e48d65dfdec9 | refs/heads/master | 1,670,372,072,769 | 1,598,920,365,000 | 1,598,920,365,000 | 264,824,992 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,118 | lean | /-
Notes
-----
A set seems to be the lambda λα : Type → Prop
`mem` takes a set and another input and simply applies the set to the other.
protected def mem (a : α) (s : set α) :=
s a
∈ is defined in library/init.core.lean.
infix ∈ := has_mem.mem
with has_mem.mem having the definition:
class has_mem (α : out_param $ Type u) (y : Type v) := (mem : α→y→Prop)
$ usage. Quoted from "Programming in Lean":
Note the use of the dollar-sign for function application. In general,
an expression f $ a denotes nothing more than f a, but the binding strength
is such that you do not need to use extra parentheses when a is a long
expression. This provides a convenient idiom in situations exactly like
the one in the example.
The statement:
∃x ∈ X
is shorthand for:
∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ X)
which is shorthand for:
∃ (x : _), ∃ (h : x ∈ X),
-/
/-
Contents and exercises for Chapter 9 of Tao's Analysis.
-/
-- We want real numbers and their basic properties
import data.real.basic
import data.set
import logic.basic
import tao_ch5
set_option pp.implicit true
-- Make simp display the steps used.
set_option trace.simplify.rewrite true
-- We want to be able to define functions using the law of excluded middle
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
-- Use a namespace so that we can copy some of the matlib naming.
namespace tao_analysis
-- Notation for absolute. Is this in Lean somewhere?
local notation `|`x`|` := abs x
/- Section 9.1
Many of these results can be found in matlib. For example, definitions and
properties of closures can be found here:
https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib_docs/topology/basic.html
-/
/- Definition 9.1.1 (Intervals)
Intervals are available in matlib.
https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib_docs/data/set/intervals/basic.html
-/
namespace demo
def x₁ : ℝ := 1
def x₂ : ℝ := 4
constant open_interval : set.Ioo x₁ x₂
constant closed_open_interval : set.Ico x₁ x₂
constant open_closed_interval : set.Ioc x₁ x₂
constant closed_interval : set.Icc x₁ x₂
end demo
/-
Exercises
---------
9.1.1
9.1.2 (Lemma 9.1.11)
9.1.3 TODO
9.1.1 again, this time using Lemma 9.1.11, and Exercise 9.1.6.
-/
-- Definition 9.1.7
-- I'm skipping this and going directly to 9.1.8
-- Definition 9.1.8
def is_adherent (x : ℝ) (X : set ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃y ∈ X, |x - y| < ε
infix `is_adherent_to` :55 := is_adherent
-- Definition 9.1.10
def closure (X : set ℝ) : set ℝ :=
{x : ℝ | x is_adherent_to X }
-- Definition 9.1.15
def is_closed (X : set ℝ) :Prop :=
closure X = X
-- Definition 9.1.18 a)
def is_limit_point (x : ℝ) (X : set ℝ) : Prop :=
is_adherent x (X \ {x})
def is_isolated_point (x : ℝ) (X : set ℝ) : Prop :=
x ∈ X ∧ ∃ ε > 0, ∀y ∈ (X \ {x}), |x - y| > ε
-- Definition 9.1.22
def is_bounded (X : set ℝ) : Prop :=
∃ M > 0, X ⊆ set.Icc (-M) M
/- Exercise 9.1.1
If X ⊆ Y ⊆ closure(X), then closure(Y) = closure(X)
This attempt is a hacky δ—ε proof; it doesn't use any properties from Lemma
9.1.11. I repeat the proof again below using Lemma 9.1.11.
-/
lemma closure_squeeze
(X Y : set ℝ)
(h₁ : X ⊆ Y)
(h₂ : Y ⊆ closure(X)) :
closure(X) = closure(Y) :=
begin
apply set.eq_of_subset_of_subset,
{
intros x h₃ ε hε,
have h₄ : x is_adherent_to X, from h₃,
have h₅ : ∃x' ∈ X, |x - x'| < ε, from h₃ ε hε,
rcases h₅ with ⟨x', h₆, h₇⟩,
have h₈ : x' ∈ Y, from h₁ h₆,
use x',
exact and.intro h₈ h₇
},
{
intros y h₃ ε hε,
set δ := ε/3 with hδ,
have h₅ : δ > 0, by linarith,
have h₆ : ∃y' ∈ Y, |y - y'| < δ, from h₃ δ h₅,
rcases h₆ with ⟨y', hy', h₇⟩,
have h₈ : y' ∈ closure(X), from h₂ hy',
have h₉ : ∃x ∈ X, |y' - x| < δ, from h₈ δ h₅,
rcases h₉ with ⟨x, hx, h₁₀⟩,
use x,
have h₁₀ : |(y - y') + (y' - x)| ≤ |y - y'| + |y' - x|, from abs_add _ _,
have h₁₁ : |y - x| < 2*δ,
rw (show (y - x) = (y - y') + (y' - x), by ring),
linarith,
have h₁₂ : |y - x| < ε, by linarith,
exact and.intro hx h₁₂
}
end
/- Exercise 9.1.2 (Lemma 9.1.11)
There are 4 separate propositions here:
1. X ⊆ closure(X)
The 4th part is done next so that it can be used in 2 and 3.
4. X ⊆ Y → closure(X) ⊆ closure(Y)
2. closure(X ∪ Y) = closure(X) ∪ closure(Y)
3. closure(X ∩ Y) ⊆ closure(X) ∩ closure(Y)
-/
-- 1. X ⊆ closure(X)
lemma subset_closure (X : set ℝ ) : X ⊆ closure(X) :=
begin
intros x h₁ ε h₂,
apply exists.intro x,
apply exists.intro h₁,
rw [sub_self, abs_zero],
exact h₂,
end
-- Trying to achieve the same thing using a term-based proof.
lemma subset_closure_term (X : set ℝ ) : X ⊆ closure(X) :=
assume x,
assume h₁ : x ∈ X,
have adh: x is_adherent_to X, from
assume ε,
assume h₂ : ε > 0,
have h₃ : |x - x| < ε, from
have h₄ : x - x = 0, from sub_self x,
sorry, -- not sure how to proceed here.
exists.intro x (exists.intro h₁ h₃),
show x ∈ closure(X), from adh
-- 4. X ⊆ Y → closure(X) ⊆ closure(Y)
lemma closure_mono {X Y :set ℝ} (hXY : X ⊆ Y) : closure(X) ⊆ closure(Y) :=
begin
intros x hx ε hε,
have : ∃x' ∈ X, |x - x'| < ε, from hx ε hε,
rcases this with ⟨x', hx', h₂⟩,
use x',
split,
exact hXY hx',
exact h₂, -- could use `assumption` here instead.
end
-- 2. closure(X ∪ Y) = closure(X) ∪ closure(Y)
lemma closure_union
{X Y : set ℝ} :
closure (X ∪ Y) = closure (X) ∪ closure (Y) :=
begin
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{
-- not sure how to do this part in Lean.
admit
},
{
intros a haXY,
cases haXY,
apply closure_mono (set.subset_union_left X Y) haXY,
apply closure_mono (set.subset_union_right X Y) haXY
}
end
/- 3. closure(X ∩ Y) ⊆ closure(X) ∩ closure(Y)
Version 1, my original ε attempt.
Below, using closure_mono, is a nicer proof.
-/
lemma closure_inter_subset_inter_closure (X Y : set ℝ) :
closure (X ∩ Y) ⊆ closure X ∩ closure Y :=
begin
intros a ha,
split,
repeat {
intros ε hε,
rcases ha ε hε with ⟨xy, hxy, h₁⟩,
use xy,
cases hxy with l r,
split; assumption
}
end
/- 3. closure(X ∩ Y) ⊆ closure(X) ∩ closure(Y)
Version 2, by Kenny Lau.
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/topic/cleaning.20up.20this.20tactic.20proof.20%28regarding.20closures%29/near/192625784
-/
lemma closure_inter_subset_inter_closure' (X Y : set ℝ) :
closure (X ∩ Y) ⊆ closure X ∩ closure Y :=
have h₁ : closure (X ∩ Y) ⊆ closure X,
from closure_mono (set.inter_subset_left X Y),
have h₂ : closure (X ∩ Y) ⊆ closure Y,
from closure_mono (set.inter_subset_right X Y),
set.subset_inter h₁ h₂
-- Lemma 9.1.12
-- There are 4 parts.
-- 1. Closure of interval (a, b) is [a, b].
lemma closure_Ioo_Icc
(a b : ℝ)
(hab : a < b) :
closure (set.Ioo a b) = (set.Icc a b) :=
begin
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{
intros x hx,
by_contradiction H,
unfold set.Icc at H,
simp at H,
have hxa : x < a ∨ a ≤ x, by exact @lt_or_ge ℝ real.linear_order x a,
cases hxa with hlt hge,
{
have h₁ : ∃ β > 0, x + β = a, from sorry,
--have h₆ : x = a - β, by linarith,--exact @eq_sub_of_add_eq ℝ real.add_group x a β h₂,
rcases h₁ with ⟨β, hβ, h₂⟩,
rcases hx β hβ with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩,
have h₃ : a < y, from hy.left,
have h₄ : ∃ α > 0, a + α = y, from sorry,
rcases h₄ with ⟨α, hα, h₅⟩,
have h₆ : a = y - α, by linarith,
rw h₆ at h₂,
have h₇ := y - x = β + α, from sorry,--by linarith, -- really linarith!
},
{
admit
},
},
{
admit
},
end
-- 2. Closure of interval (a, b] is [a, b].
-- 3. Closure of interval [a, b) is [a, b].
-- 4. Closure of interval [a, b] is [a, b].
-- [TODO: convert to lean]
-- Exercise 9.1.3
-- This needs to be improved! How to properly prove being equal to the
-- empty set?
lemma is_empty_closed : is_closed ∅ :=
begin
unfold is_closed,
unfold closure,
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{
intros x hx,
have h₁ : ∀ ε > 0, ∃x' ∈ ∅, |x - x'| < ε, from hx,
set a : ℝ := 1 with h₂,
have h₃ : a > 0, by linarith,
rcases h₁ a h₃ with ⟨x', h0, h0a⟩,
exact h0
},
{simp,}
end
-- Exercise 9.1.4
-- Exercise 9.1.5
/-
Exercise 9.1.6
-/
lemma closure_closure (X : set ℝ) : closure (closure X) = closure X :=
begin
apply set.subset.antisymm,
{
intros a haX ε hε,
set δ := ε/3 with h3δ,
have hδ : δ > 0, by linarith,
rcases haX δ hδ with ⟨xc, hxc, h₁⟩,
rcases hxc δ hδ with ⟨x, hx, h₂⟩,
use x,
split,
exact hx,
calc |a - x| = |(a - xc) + (xc - x)| : by ring
... ≤ |a - xc| + |xc - x| : by apply abs_add
... < 2 * δ : by linarith
... < ε : by linarith
},
{
apply subset_closure (closure X)
}
end
/- Exercise 9.1.6 (version 2)
If you decide to follow the book and prove exercise 9.1.1 first, then you can
use that result to prove 9.1.6 easily. Above, 9.1.6 is done without 9.1.1
so as to be available for earlier proofs.
-/
example {X : set ℝ} : closure (closure X) = closure X :=
begin
-- Use closure(X) as the middle term in 9.1.1's lemma.
let Y := closure X,
have h₁ : X ⊆ Y, from subset_closure X,
have h₂ : Y ⊆ closure X, from set.subset.refl Y,
have h₃ : closure X = closure (closure X), from closure_squeeze X Y h₁ h₂,
apply eq.symm, -- Should `simp,` work here instead?
exact h₃,
end
/- Exercise 9.1.7
A the union of a finite number of closed sets is closed.
It seems possible to either:
a) take a function, f: ℕ → set ℝ, as input and induce on ℕ, or
b) take a finset ℝ as input and induce using the provided mechanism of finset.
Let's try a)
The captial 'U' refers to the union of the family of sets.
Note: should the `n` be removed?
mathlib uses 'is_closed_bUnion' to name their method. I'm not sure what
the b prefix means here.
-/
/-lemma is_closed_Union
{ss : finset set ℝ}
(h₁ : ∀s ∈ ss, is_closed (s)) :
is_closed (set.Union (finset.to_set ss)) :=
sorry
-/
/- TODO
Struggling to induce over finite sets, so I'll try a more general approach of
using index sets and come back later to address it. We can define f to be
a function that simply maps all i>n to n to achieve the same thing as intented,
it's just not really honoring the intent of the original statement.
-/
lemma is_closed_Union_n
{n : ℕ}
{f : ℕ → set ℝ}
(h₁ : ∀i < n, is_closed (f i)) :
is_closed ⋃ i < n, f i :=
sorry
lemma not_le_of_ge (a b : ℝ) (h : ¬ a < b) : a ≥ b :=
begin
-- ge_iff_le isn't actually needed.
rw [@not_lt ℝ real.linear_order a b, ←ge_iff_le] at h,
exact h
end
--@iff.mp (¬a < b) (b ≤ a) (@not_lt ℝ real.linear_order a b) h
variables P : ℝ → Prop
example (a : ℝ) (h : ∀ y : ℝ, P y → ¬ a < y) : ∀ y : ℝ, P y → a ≥ y :=
begin
simp_rw @not_lt ℝ real.linear_order a at h,
exact h
end
/-- Exercise 9.1.9
I took two approaches to solving this.
1. Tao's order
I approached it in the sequence presented in the problem (starting with adherent
points being limit points xor isolated points). The first part of this turned
into a monolithic tactic proof.
2. First introduce to iff statements
In an attempt to make the above proof less of a monolith, I proved the
bijections:
is_limit_point x X ↔ x ∈ closure (X \ {x})
is_isolated_point x X ↔ is_adherent x X ∧ x ∉ closure (X \ {x})
However, the second of these proofs turned out to be even more involved than the
original monolith, so nothing was really gained here.
-/
-- 1. Tao's order.
/- 1.1
An adherent point to set of reals is exactly one of the following:
* a limit point or
* an isolated point
-/
lemma limit_xor_isolated
(X : set ℝ)
(x : ℝ)
(hx : is_adherent x X) :
is_isolated_point x X ↔ ¬ is_limit_point x X :=
begin
split,
{
intros hix hlx,
rcases hix with ⟨hxX, ε, hε, hy⟩,
rcases hlx ε hε with ⟨y, hyX, hxy⟩,
have h₁ := hy y hyX,
linarith,
},
{
intros nhlx,
-- unfold so that simp will be able to work.
unfold is_limit_point is_adherent at nhlx,
-- Push the negative all the way to the < relation.
simp_rw [not_forall, not_exists, @not_lt ℝ real.linear_order] at nhlx,
-- Writing it out here will nicer variables.
have h₁ : ∃ (ε : ℝ) (hε : ε > 0), ∀ (y : ℝ), y ∈ X \ {x} → |x - y| ≥ ε, from nhlx,
-- Q: Is there an easy way to replace all ≥ with > knowing that we can find
-- a smaller real?
-- I just want to replace ≥ with >. It look simple, but it takes me...
have h₂ : ∃ (ε : ℝ) (hε : ε > 0), ∀ (y : ℝ), y ∈ X \ {x} → |x - y| > ε,
rcases h₁ with ⟨ε, hε, hy⟩,
use ε/2,
split,
{
exact (by linarith),
},
{
intros y hyX,
have h:= hy y hyX,
linarith,
},
-- ... 8 lines.
split,
{
rcases h₁ with ⟨ε, hε, hy⟩,
rcases hx ε hε with ⟨y, hyX, hxy⟩,
by_contradiction,
rw ←(set.diff_singleton_eq_self a) at hyX,
have nhxy := hy y hyX,
linarith,
},
{
exact h₂
}
}
end
-- 1.2 a limit point is an adherent point.
lemma adherent_of_limit
{X : set ℝ}
{x : ℝ}
(h : is_limit_point x X) :
is_adherent x X :=
begin
set X_diff_x := X \ {x},
have h₁ : is_adherent x X_diff_x, from h,
have h₂ : X_diff_x ⊆ X, from set.diff_subset X {x},
exact closure_mono h₂ h₁,
end
-- 1.3 a isolated point is an adherent point.
lemma adherent_of_isolated
{X : set ℝ}
{x : ℝ}
(h : is_isolated_point x X) :
is_adherent x X :=
begin
intros ε hε,
use x,
rw [sub_self, abs_zero],
exact ⟨h.left, hε⟩,
end
-- 2. Custom order.
lemma limit_iff_mem_closure_minus
{X : set ℝ}
{x : ℝ} :
is_limit_point x X ↔ x ∈ closure (X \ {x}) :=
begin
unfold is_limit_point closure,
simp
end
lemma isolated_iff_adherent_not_mem_closure_minus
{X : set ℝ}
{x : ℝ} :
is_isolated_point x X ↔ is_adherent x X ∧ x ∉ closure (X \ {x}) :=
begin
split,
{
intro h,
split,
{
intros ε hε,
use x,
rw [sub_self, abs_zero],
exact ⟨h.left,hε⟩,
},
{
-- I wanted to push the negative to the left and produce:
-- ∃ ε > 0, ¬∃ y ∈ X\{x}, |x - y| ≤ ε
-- ∃ ε/2 > 0, ¬∃ y ∈ X\{x}, |x - y| < ε/2
-- ¬ ∀ ε/2 > 0, ∃ y ∈ X\{x}, |x - y| < ε/2
-- which is our goal.
-- But, as seen below, it's tedius, so I'll just bounce between the ∃ and ∀.
intros hn,
rcases h.right with ⟨ε, hε, h₁⟩,
simp at hn h₁,
rcases hn ε hε with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩,
simp at hy,
have h := h₁ y hy.left hy.right,
linarith,
}
},
{
assume h,
have h₁ : x ∈ closure X, from h.left,
split,
{
by_contradiction,
have h₂ : X = X \ {x}, from eq.symm (set.diff_singleton_eq_self a),
rw h₂ at h₁,
exact h.right h₁,
},
{
have hr := h.right,
unfold closure is_adherent at hr,
rw set.mem_set_of_eq at hr,
-- Push the negative all the way to the < relation.
simp_rw [not_forall, not_exists, @not_lt ℝ real.linear_order,
iff.symm ge_iff_le] at hr,
-- I just want to replace ≥ with >. It look simple, but it takes me...
have ans : ∃ (ε : ℝ) (hε : ε > 0), ∀ (y : ℝ), y ∈ X \ {x} → |x - y| > ε,
rcases hr with ⟨ε, hε, hy⟩,
use ε/2,
split,
exact (by linarith),
intros y hyX,
have h:= hy y hyX,
linarith,
-- ... 8 lines.-/
exact ans
}
}
end
lemma limit_xor_isolated'
(X : set ℝ)
(x : ℝ)
(hx : is_adherent x X) :
is_isolated_point x X ↔ ¬ is_limit_point x X :=
begin
split,
{
intros hix hlx,
exact (iff.elim_left isolated_iff_adherent_not_mem_closure_minus hix).right hlx,
},
{
intros nhlx,
rw limit_iff_mem_closure_minus at nhlx,
have h₁ := and.intro hx nhlx,
exact (iff.elim_right isolated_iff_adherent_not_mem_closure_minus h₁)
}
end
-- Exercise 9.1.10
-- This is an trivial proof on paper, but I ended up with a mess in Lean.
example (X : set ℝ) (h : X.nonempty) :
is_bounded X ↔ has_finite_sup X ∧ has_finite_inf X :=
begin
split,
{
-- The forward proof isn't too bad—it's the reverse that is the main issue.
intro hb,
rcases hb with ⟨u, hu, h₁⟩,
let l := -u,
have hub : u ∈ upper_bounds X,
intros x hx,
exact (h₁ hx).right,
have hlb : l ∈ lower_bounds X,
intros x hx,
exact (h₁ hx).left,
have hfs : has_finite_sup X, from ⟨h, set.nonempty_of_mem hub⟩,
have hfi : has_finite_inf X, from ⟨h, set.nonempty_of_mem hlb⟩,
exact ⟨hfs, hfi⟩,
},
{
-- This part is a mess, mainly becase:
-- 1. I don't find a simple way of going from `u l : ℝ` to `∃ m > 0, m ≥ u ∧ m ≥ l`
-- 2. I don't know of a tactic like `linarith` that will work with abs inequalities.
intro h,
rcases h.left.right with ⟨u, hu⟩,
rcases h.right.right with ⟨l, hl⟩,
-- Try create m by setting it equal to `|upper bound| + |lower bound| + 1`
let m0 := |u| + |l|,
have h₁ : m0 ≥ |u| ∧ m0 ≥ |l|,
split; {norm_num, apply abs_nonneg},
let m1 : ℝ := m0 + 1,
have h₂ : m0 ≤ m1, by norm_num,
have h₄ : m1 ≥ |u| ∧ m1 ≥ |l|,
-- Short but opaque alternative for h₄ proof:
-- split; cases h₁; apply le_trans; assumption,
split,
{
apply le_trans h₁.left h₂,
},
{
apply le_trans h₁.right h₂,
},
use m1,
split,
{
-- Can't find any automation for here.
have m0_nonneg : 0 ≤ m0, from add_nonneg (abs_nonneg u) (abs_nonneg l),
have h₃ : 0 < m1, from add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos m0_nonneg (by norm_num),
exact h₃,
},
{
intros x hx,
-- Can't find any automation for here.
have hxm : x ≤ m1, from le_trans (hu hx) (le_trans (le_abs_self u) h₄.left),
have hml : -l ≤ m1, from le_trans (neg_le_abs_self l) h₄.right,
rw neg_le at hml,
have hmx := le_trans hml (hl hx),
exact ⟨hmx, hxm⟩,
},
},
end
example (X : set ℝ) (h : X.nonempty) :
is_bounded X ↔ has_finite_sup X ∧ has_finite_inf X :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨M, M0, hM⟩,
exact ⟨⟨h, M, λ x h, (hM h).2⟩, ⟨h, -M, λ x h, (hM h).1⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨⟨_, u, hu⟩, ⟨_, v, hv⟩⟩,
use max 1 (max u (-v)), split,
{ apply lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one,
apply le_max_left },
{ intros x hx, split,
{ apply neg_le.1,
apply le_trans _ (le_max_right _ _),
apply le_trans _ (le_max_right _ _),
apply neg_le_neg,
exact hv hx },
{ apply le_trans _ (le_max_right _ _),
apply le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _),
exact hu hx } } }
end
/-
intros hlx,
--have h₁ := not_forall hlx,
have h₁ := iff.elim_left not_forall hlx,
-- Why can't I apply rw not_imp here? simp goes too far.
-- rw not_imp,
cases h₁ with ε h₂,
have h₃ := iff.elim_left not_imp h₂,
cases h₃,
rw not_exists at h₃_right,
-- Why can't I write: rw ←not_le at h₃_right,
split,
{
rcases hx ε h₃_left with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩,
have h₄ := h₃_right y,
rw not_exists at h₄,
by_contradiction,
have h₅ := and.intro hy a,
rw [set.sub_eq_diff, set.mem_diff] at h₄,
have h₆ : y ≠ x,
by_contradiction,
simp at a_1,
have h₇ := h₄ ⟨h₅.left, _⟩,
simp at h₄,
},
{
set δ := ε/2 with h3δ,
have hδ : δ > 0, by linarith,
use δ,
split,
exact hδ,
intros y hy,
have h₄ := h₃_right y,
rw not_exists at h₄,
have h₅ := h₄ hy,
linarith,
}
--rcases hx ε h₃.left with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩,
}
end-/
/-have h₁ : ¬(is_isolated_point x X ∧ is_limit_point x X),
intro h₂,
rcases h₂.left with ⟨hxX, ε, hε, hy⟩,
have h₃ := h₂.right ε hε,
rcases h₃ with ⟨y, hyX, hxy⟩,
have h₄ := hy y hyX,
linarith,-/
/-{
intros hix hlx,
rcases hix with ⟨hxX, ε, hε, hy⟩,
rcases hlx ε hε with ⟨y, hyX, hxy⟩,
have h₁ := hy y hyX,
linarith,
},
{
intros hlx hix,
}
end-/
lemma limit_point_is_adherent
(X : set ℝ)
(x : ℝ)
(h₁ : is_limit_point x X):
is_adherent x X :=
sorry
lemma isolated_point_is_adherent
(X : set ℝ)
(x : ℝ)
(h₁ : is_isolated_point x X):
is_adherent x X :=
sorry
/-- Exercise 9.1.10
-/
lemma closure_bounded_if_bounded :
(X :)
end tao_analysis |
21ee442dd44585d4eb5f184f751a82590842a6b5 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/topology/algebra/group_completion_auto.lean | 2c6a94975f006849ca46b361daeee808242fc1bc | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,842 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
Completion of topological groups:
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.topology.uniform_space.completion
import Mathlib.topology.algebra.uniform_group
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u u_1 v
namespace Mathlib
protected instance uniform_space.completion.has_zero {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [HasZero α] :
HasZero (uniform_space.completion α) :=
{ zero := ↑0 }
protected instance uniform_space.completion.has_neg {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [Neg α] :
Neg (uniform_space.completion α) :=
{ neg := uniform_space.completion.map fun (a : α) => -a }
protected instance uniform_space.completion.has_add {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [Add α] :
Add (uniform_space.completion α) :=
{ add := uniform_space.completion.map₂ Add.add }
protected instance uniform_space.completion.has_sub {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [Sub α] :
Sub (uniform_space.completion α) :=
{ sub := uniform_space.completion.map₂ Sub.sub }
-- TODO: switch sides once #1103 is fixed
theorem uniform_space.completion.coe_zero {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [HasZero α] : ↑0 = 0 := rfl
namespace uniform_space.completion
theorem coe_neg {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α] [uniform_add_group α] (a : α) :
↑(-a) = -↑a :=
Eq.symm (map_coe uniform_continuous_neg a)
theorem coe_sub {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α] [uniform_add_group α] (a : α)
(b : α) : ↑(a - b) = ↑a - ↑b :=
Eq.symm (map₂_coe_coe a b Sub.sub uniform_continuous_sub)
theorem coe_add {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α] [uniform_add_group α] (a : α)
(b : α) : ↑(a + b) = ↑a + ↑b :=
Eq.symm (map₂_coe_coe a b Add.add uniform_continuous_add)
protected instance sub_neg_monoid {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α]
[uniform_add_group α] : sub_neg_monoid (completion α) :=
sub_neg_monoid.mk Add.add sorry 0 sorry sorry Neg.neg Sub.sub
protected instance add_group {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α] [uniform_add_group α] :
add_group (completion α) :=
add_group.mk sub_neg_monoid.add sorry sub_neg_monoid.zero sorry sorry sub_neg_monoid.neg
sub_neg_monoid.sub sorry
protected instance uniform_add_group {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α]
[uniform_add_group α] : uniform_add_group (completion α) :=
uniform_add_group.mk (uniform_continuous_map₂ Sub.sub)
protected instance is_add_group_hom_coe {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α]
[uniform_add_group α] : is_add_group_hom coe :=
is_add_group_hom.mk
theorem is_add_group_hom_extension {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α]
[uniform_add_group α] {β : Type v} [uniform_space β] [add_group β] [uniform_add_group β]
[complete_space β] [separated_space β] {f : α → β} [is_add_group_hom f] (hf : continuous f) :
is_add_group_hom (completion.extension f) :=
(fun (hf : uniform_continuous f) => is_add_group_hom.mk) (uniform_continuous_of_continuous hf)
theorem is_add_group_hom_map {α : Type u_1} [uniform_space α] [add_group α] [uniform_add_group α]
{β : Type v} [uniform_space β] [add_group β] [uniform_add_group β] {f : α → β}
[is_add_group_hom f] (hf : continuous f) : is_add_group_hom (completion.map f) :=
is_add_group_hom_extension (continuous.comp (continuous_coe β) hf)
protected instance add_comm_group {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] [add_comm_group α]
[uniform_add_group α] : add_comm_group (completion α) :=
add_comm_group.mk add_group.add sorry add_group.zero sorry sorry add_group.neg add_group.sub sorry
sorry
end Mathlib |
e5d590c3a34ea9c6e3ab6371d9c12d625e176c16 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/topology/algebra/multilinear.lean | fe349c037ab8bee6a66490fdda32f6a767e6995b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,086 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.algebra.module
import linear_algebra.multilinear
/-!
# Continuous multilinear maps
We define continuous multilinear maps as maps from `Π(i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂` which are multilinear
and continuous, by extending the space of multilinear maps with a continuity assumption.
Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type, and all these
spaces are also topological spaces.
## Main definitions
* `continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂` is the space of continuous multilinear maps from
`Π(i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂`. We show that it is an `R`-module.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API of multilinear maps.
## Notation
We introduce the notation `M [×n]→L[R] M'` for the space of continuous `n`-multilinear maps from
`M^n` to `M'`. This is a particular case of the general notion (where we allow varying dependent
types as the arguments of our continuous multilinear maps), but arguably the most important one,
especially when defining iterated derivatives.
-/
open function fin set
open_locale big_operators
universes u v w w₁ w₁' w₂ w₃ w₄
variables {R : Type u} {ι : Type v} {n : ℕ} {M : fin n.succ → Type w} {M₁ : ι → Type w₁}
{M₁' : ι → Type w₁'} {M₂ : Type w₂} {M₃ : Type w₃} {M₄ : Type w₄} [decidable_eq ι]
/-- Continuous multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `Πi, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂`
are modules over `R` with a topological structure. In applications, there will be compatibility
conditions between the algebraic and the topological structures, but this is not needed for the
definition. -/
structure continuous_multilinear_map (R : Type u) {ι : Type v} (M₁ : ι → Type w₁) (M₂ : Type w₂)
[decidable_eq ι] [semiring R] [∀i, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[∀i, module R (M₁ i)] [module R M₂] [∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂]
extends multilinear_map R M₁ M₂ :=
(cont : continuous to_fun)
notation M `[×`:25 n `]→L[`:25 R `] ` M' := continuous_multilinear_map R (λ (i : fin n), M) M'
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
section semiring
variables [semiring R]
[Πi, add_comm_monoid (M i)] [Πi, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [Πi, add_comm_monoid (M₁' i)]
[add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₄] [Π i, module R (M i)]
[Π i, module R (M₁ i)] [Π i, module R (M₁' i)] [module R M₂]
[module R M₃] [module R M₄]
[Π i, topological_space (M i)] [Π i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [Π i, topological_space (M₁' i)]
[topological_space M₂] [topological_space M₃] [topological_space M₄]
(f f' : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
instance : has_coe_to_fun (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨_, λ f, f.to_multilinear_map.to_fun⟩
@[continuity] lemma coe_continuous : continuous (f : (Π i, M₁ i) → M₂) := f.cont
@[simp] lemma coe_coe : (f.to_multilinear_map : (Π i, M₁ i) → M₂) = f := rfl
theorem to_multilinear_map_inj :
function.injective (continuous_multilinear_map.to_multilinear_map :
continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂ → multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
| ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ rfl := rfl
@[ext] theorem ext {f f' : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
to_multilinear_map_inj $ multilinear_map.ext H
@[simp] lemma map_add (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.map_add' m i x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.map_smul' m i c x
lemma map_coord_zero {m : Πi, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_coord_zero i h
@[simp] lemma map_zero [nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_zero
instance : has_zero (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨{ cont := continuous_const, ..(0 : multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) }⟩
instance : inhabited (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (0 : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) m = 0 := rfl
section has_continuous_add
variable [has_continuous_add M₂]
instance : has_add (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ f f', ⟨f.to_multilinear_map + f'.to_multilinear_map, f.cont.add f'.cont⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_multilinear_map_add (f g : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :
(f + g).to_multilinear_map = f.to_multilinear_map + g.to_multilinear_map :=
rfl
instance add_comm_monoid : add_comm_monoid (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
to_multilinear_map_inj.add_comm_monoid _ rfl (λ _ _, rfl)
/-- Evaluation of a `continuous_multilinear_map` at a vector as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
def apply_add_hom (m : Π i, M₁ i) : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂ →+ M₂ :=
⟨λ f, f m, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
(m : Πi, M₁ i) {s : finset α} : (∑ a in s, f a) m = ∑ a in s, f a m :=
(apply_add_hom m).map_sum f s
end has_continuous_add
/-- If `f` is a continuous multilinear map, then `f.to_continuous_linear_map m i` is the continuous
linear map obtained by fixing all coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the
`i`-th coordinate. -/
def to_continuous_linear_map (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := f.cont.comp (continuous_const.update i continuous_id),
.. f.to_multilinear_map.to_linear_map m i }
/-- The cartesian product of two continuous multilinear maps, as a continuous multilinear map. -/
def prod (f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) (g : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₃) :
continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ cont := f.cont.prod_mk g.cont,
.. f.to_multilinear_map.prod g.to_multilinear_map }
@[simp] lemma prod_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) (g : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₃) (m : Πi, M₁ i) :
(f.prod g) m = (f m, g m) := rfl
/-- Combine a family of continuous multilinear maps with the same domain and codomains `M' i` into a
continuous multilinear map taking values in the space of functions `Π i, M' i`. -/
def pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [Π i, add_comm_group (M' i)] [Π i, topological_space (M' i)]
[Π i, module R (M' i)] (f : Π i, continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ (M' i)) :
continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ (Π i, M' i) :=
{ cont := continuous_pi $ λ i, (f i).coe_continuous,
to_multilinear_map := multilinear_map.pi (λ i, (f i).to_multilinear_map) }
@[simp] lemma coe_pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [Π i, add_comm_group (M' i)]
[Π i, topological_space (M' i)] [Π i, module R (M' i)]
(f : Π i, continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ (M' i)) :
⇑(pi f) = λ m j, f j m :=
rfl
lemma pi_apply {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [Π i, add_comm_group (M' i)]
[Π i, topological_space (M' i)] [Π i, module R (M' i)]
(f : Π i, continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ (M' i)) (m : Π i, M₁ i) (j : ι') :
pi f m j = f j m :=
rfl
/-- If `g` is continuous multilinear and `f` is a collection of continuous linear maps,
then `g (f₁ m₁, ..., fₙ mₙ)` is again a continuous multilinear map, that we call
`g.comp_continuous_linear_map f`. -/
def comp_continuous_linear_map
(g : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁' M₄) (f : Π i : ι, M₁ i →L[R] M₁' i) :
continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₄ :=
{ cont := g.cont.comp $ continuous_pi $ λj, (f j).cont.comp $ continuous_apply _,
.. g.to_multilinear_map.comp_linear_map (λ i, (f i).to_linear_map) }
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_linear_map_apply (g : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁' M₄)
(f : Π i : ι, M₁ i →L[R] M₁' i) (m : Π i, M₁ i) :
g.comp_continuous_linear_map f m = g (λ i, f i $ m i) :=
rfl
/-- In the specific case of continuous multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `fin (n+1)`, where one
can build an element of `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the
additivity of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
lemma cons_add (f : continuous_multilinear_map R M M₂) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x+y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.cons_add m x y
/-- In the specific case of continuous multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `fin (n+1)`, where one
can build an element of `Π(i : fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the
multiplicativity of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
lemma cons_smul
(f : continuous_multilinear_map R M M₂) (m : Π(i : fin n), M i.succ) (c : R) (x : M 0) :
f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.cons_smul m c x
lemma map_piecewise_add (m m' : Πi, M₁ i) (t : finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = ∑ s in t.powerset, f (s.piecewise m m') :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_piecewise_add _ _ _
/-- Additivity of a continuous multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
lemma map_add_univ [fintype ι] (m m' : Πi, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = ∑ s : finset ι, f (s.piecewise m m') :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_add_univ _ _
section apply_sum
open fintype finset
variables {α : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] (g : Π i, α i → M₁ i) (A : Π i, finset (α i))
/-- If `f` is continuous multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the
sum of `f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
lemma map_sum_finset :
f (λ i, ∑ j in A i, g i j) = ∑ r in pi_finset A, f (λ i, g i (r i)) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_sum_finset _ _
/-- If `f` is continuous multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
lemma map_sum [∀ i, fintype (α i)] :
f (λ i, ∑ j, g i j) = ∑ r : Π i, α i, f (λ i, g i (r i)) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_sum _
end apply_sum
section restrict_scalar
variables (R) {A : Type*} [semiring A] [has_scalar R A] [Π (i : ι), module A (M₁ i)]
[module A M₂] [∀ i, is_scalar_tower R A (M₁ i)] [is_scalar_tower R A M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an `A`-multilinear map as an `R`-multilinear map, if `A` is an algebra over `R`
and their actions on all involved modules agree with the action of `R` on `A`. -/
def restrict_scalars (f : continuous_multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :
continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂ :=
{ to_multilinear_map := f.to_multilinear_map.restrict_scalars R,
cont := f.cont }
@[simp] lemma coe_restrict_scalars (f : continuous_multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :
⇑(f.restrict_scalars R) = f := rfl
end restrict_scalar
end semiring
section ring
variables [ring R] [∀i, add_comm_group (M₁ i)] [add_comm_group M₂]
[∀i, module R (M₁ i)] [module R M₂] [∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂]
(f f' : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
@[simp] lemma map_sub (m : Πi, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_sub _ _ _ _
section topological_add_group
variable [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : has_neg (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ f, {cont := f.cont.neg, ..(-f.to_multilinear_map)}⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (-f) m = - (f m) := rfl
instance : has_sub (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ f g, { cont := f.cont.sub g.cont, .. (f.to_multilinear_map - g.to_multilinear_map) }⟩
@[simp] lemma sub_apply (m : Πi, M₁ i) : (f - f') m = f m - f' m := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :=
to_multilinear_map_inj.add_comm_group _ rfl (λ _ _, rfl) (λ _, rfl) (λ _ _, rfl)
end topological_add_group
end ring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R]
[∀i, add_comm_monoid (M₁ i)] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[∀i, module R (M₁ i)] [module R M₂]
[∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂]
(f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂)
lemma map_piecewise_smul (c : ι → R) (m : Πi, M₁ i) (s : finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (λ i, c i • m i) m) = (∏ i in s, c i) • f m :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_piecewise_smul _ _ _
/-- Multiplicativity of a continuous multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (λ i, c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`. -/
lemma map_smul_univ [fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : Πi, M₁ i) :
f (λ i, c i • m i) = (∏ i, c i) • f m :=
f.to_multilinear_map.map_smul_univ _ _
variables {R' A : Type*} [comm_semiring R'] [semiring A] [algebra R' A]
[Π i, module A (M₁ i)] [module R' M₂] [module A M₂] [is_scalar_tower R' A M₂]
[topological_space R'] [has_continuous_smul R' M₂]
instance : has_scalar R' (continuous_multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ c f, { cont := continuous_const.smul f.cont, .. c • f.to_multilinear_map }⟩
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (f : continuous_multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) (c : R') (m : Πi, M₁ i) :
(c • f) m = c • f m := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_multilinear_map_smul (c : R') (f : continuous_multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :
(c • f).to_multilinear_map = c • f.to_multilinear_map :=
rfl
instance {R''} [comm_semiring R''] [has_scalar R' R''] [algebra R'' A]
[module R'' M₂] [is_scalar_tower R'' A M₂] [is_scalar_tower R' R'' M₂]
[topological_space R''] [has_continuous_smul R'' M₂]:
is_scalar_tower R' R'' (continuous_multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨λ c₁ c₂ f, ext $ λ x, smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
variable [has_continuous_add M₂]
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the
pointwise addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : module R' (continuous_multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :=
{ one_smul := λ f, ext $ λ x, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ c₁ c₂ f, ext $ λ x, mul_smul _ _ _,
smul_zero := λ r, ext $ λ x, smul_zero _,
smul_add := λ r f₁ f₂, ext $ λ x, smul_add _ _ _,
add_smul := λ r₁ r₂ f, ext $ λ x, add_smul _ _ _,
zero_smul := λ f, ext $ λ x, zero_smul _ _ }
/-- Linear map version of the map `to_multilinear_map` associating to a continuous multilinear map
the corresponding multilinear map. -/
@[simps] def to_multilinear_map_linear :
(continuous_multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) →ₗ[R'] (multilinear_map A M₁ M₂) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f.to_multilinear_map,
map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl }
end comm_semiring
end continuous_multilinear_map
namespace continuous_linear_map
variables [ring R] [∀i, add_comm_group (M₁ i)] [add_comm_group M₂] [add_comm_group M₃]
[∀i, module R (M₁ i)] [module R M₂] [module R M₃]
[∀i, topological_space (M₁ i)] [topological_space M₂] [topological_space M₃]
/-- Composing a continuous multilinear map with a continuous linear map gives again a
continuous multilinear map. -/
def comp_continuous_multilinear_map (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :
continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₃ :=
{ cont := g.cont.comp f.cont,
.. g.to_linear_map.comp_multilinear_map f.to_multilinear_map }
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_multilinear_map_coe (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃)
(f : continuous_multilinear_map R M₁ M₂) :
((g.comp_continuous_multilinear_map f) : (Πi, M₁ i) → M₃) =
(g : M₂ → M₃) ∘ (f : (Πi, M₁ i) → M₂) :=
by { ext m, refl }
end continuous_linear_map
|
d008139e0f94f721fcbdf8637beaebb68e08cc53 | d9d511f37a523cd7659d6f573f990e2a0af93c6f | /src/data/polynomial/denoms_clearable.lean | 36cde53bb00901f554282b6fe0886d95c685b57e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hikari0108/mathlib | b7ea2b7350497ab1a0b87a09d093ecc025a50dfa | a9e7d333b0cfd45f13a20f7b96b7d52e19fa2901 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,483,608,260 | 1,631,541,580,000 | 1,631,541,580,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,689 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import data.polynomial.erase_lead
import data.polynomial.eval
/-!
# Denominators of evaluation of polynomials at ratios
Let `i : R → K` be a homomorphism of semirings. Assume that `K` is commutative. If `a` and
`b` are elements of `R` such that `i b ∈ K` is invertible, then for any polynomial
`f ∈ polynomial R` the "mathematical" expression `b ^ f.nat_degree * f (a / b) ∈ K` is in
the image of the homomorphism `i`.
-/
open polynomial finset
section denoms_clearable
variables {R K : Type*} [semiring R] [comm_semiring K] {i : R →+* K}
variables {a b : R} {bi : K}
-- TODO: use hypothesis (ub : is_unit (i b)) to work with localizations.
/-- `denoms_clearable` formalizes the property that `b ^ N * f (a / b)`
does not have denominators, if the inequality `f.nat_degree ≤ N` holds.
The definition asserts the existence of an element `D` of `R` and an
element `bi = 1 / i b` of `K` such that clearing the denominators of
the fraction equals `i D`.
-/
def denoms_clearable (a b : R) (N : ℕ) (f : polynomial R) (i : R →+* K) : Prop :=
∃ (D : R) (bi : K), bi * i b = 1 ∧ i D = i b ^ N * eval (i a * bi) (f.map i)
lemma denoms_clearable_zero (N : ℕ) (a : R) (bu : bi * i b = 1) :
denoms_clearable a b N 0 i :=
⟨0, bi, bu, by simp only [eval_zero, ring_hom.map_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]⟩
lemma denoms_clearable_C_mul_X_pow {N : ℕ} (a : R) (bu : bi * i b = 1) {n : ℕ} (r : R)
(nN : n ≤ N) : denoms_clearable a b N (C r * X ^ n) i :=
begin
refine ⟨r * a ^ n * b ^ (N - n), bi, bu, _⟩,
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, map_monomial, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eval_mul, eval_pow, eval_C],
rw [ring_hom.map_mul, ring_hom.map_mul, ring_hom.map_pow, ring_hom.map_pow, eval_X, mul_comm],
rw [← nat.sub_add_cancel nN] {occs := occurrences.pos [2]},
rw [pow_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm (i b ^ n), mul_pow, mul_assoc, mul_assoc (i a ^ n), ← mul_pow],
rw [bu, one_pow, mul_one],
end
lemma denoms_clearable.add {N : ℕ} {f g : polynomial R} :
denoms_clearable a b N f i → denoms_clearable a b N g i → denoms_clearable a b N (f + g) i :=
λ ⟨Df, bf, bfu, Hf⟩ ⟨Dg, bg, bgu, Hg⟩, ⟨Df + Dg, bf, bfu,
begin
rw [ring_hom.map_add, polynomial.map_add, eval_add, mul_add, Hf, Hg],
congr,
refine @inv_unique K _ (i b) bg bf _ _;
rwa mul_comm,
end ⟩
lemma denoms_clearable_of_nat_degree_le (N : ℕ) (a : R) (bu : bi * i b = 1) :
∀ (f : polynomial R), f.nat_degree ≤ N → denoms_clearable a b N f i :=
induction_with_nat_degree_le N
(denoms_clearable_zero N a bu)
(λ N_1 r r0, denoms_clearable_C_mul_X_pow a bu r)
(λ f g fN gN df dg, df.add dg)
/-- If `i : R → K` is a ring homomorphism, `f` is a polynomial with coefficients in `R`,
`a, b` are elements of `R`, with `i b` invertible, then there is a `D ∈ R` such that
`b ^ f.nat_degree * f (a / b)` equals `i D`. -/
theorem denoms_clearable_nat_degree
(i : R →+* K) (f : polynomial R) (a : R) (bu : bi * i b = 1) :
denoms_clearable a b f.nat_degree f i :=
denoms_clearable_of_nat_degree_le f.nat_degree a bu f le_rfl
end denoms_clearable
open ring_hom
/-- Evaluating a polynomial with integer coefficients at a rational number and clearing
denominators, yields a number greater than or equal to one. The target can be any
`linear_ordered_field K`.
The assumption on `K` could be weakened to `linear_ordered_comm_ring` assuming that the
image of the denominator is invertible in `K`. -/
lemma one_le_pow_mul_abs_eval_div {K : Type*} [linear_ordered_field K] {f : polynomial ℤ}
{a b : ℤ} (b0 : 0 < b) (fab : eval ((a : K) / b) (f.map (algebra_map ℤ K)) ≠ 0) :
(1 : K) ≤ b ^ f.nat_degree * abs (eval ((a : K) / b) (f.map (algebra_map ℤ K))) :=
begin
obtain ⟨ev, bi, bu, hF⟩ := @denoms_clearable_nat_degree _ _ _ _ b _ (algebra_map ℤ K)
f a (by { rw [eq_int_cast, one_div_mul_cancel], rw [int.cast_ne_zero], exact (b0.ne.symm) }),
obtain Fa := congr_arg abs hF,
rw [eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left bu, eq_int_cast, eq_int_cast, abs_mul] at Fa,
rw [abs_of_pos (pow_pos (int.cast_pos.mpr b0) _ : 0 < (b : K) ^ _), one_div, eq_int_cast] at Fa,
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← Fa, ← int.cast_abs, ← int.cast_one, int.cast_le],
refine int.le_of_lt_add_one ((lt_add_iff_pos_left 1).mpr (abs_pos.mpr (λ F0, fab _))),
rw [eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left bu, F0, one_div, eq_int_cast, int.cast_zero, zero_eq_mul] at hF,
cases hF with hF hF,
{ exact (not_le.mpr b0 (le_of_eq (int.cast_eq_zero.mp (pow_eq_zero hF)))).elim },
{ rwa div_eq_mul_inv }
end
|
1c8edae700f7fb22621f68ffbd8ce2b4b3fc42a0 | 9dc8cecdf3c4634764a18254e94d43da07142918 | /src/linear_algebra/adic_completion.lean | 161f4c3ad06dd7120a6cb2de4e70b479308955f7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcommelin/mathlib | d8456447c36c176e14d96d9e76f39841f69d2d9b | ee8279351a2e434c2852345c51b728d22af5a156 | refs/heads/master | 1,664,782,136,488 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 1,663,638,983,000 | 132,563,656 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,663,599,929,000 | 1,525,760,539,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,023 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.geom_sum
import linear_algebra.smodeq
import ring_theory.ideal.quotient
import ring_theory.jacobson_ideal
/-!
# Completion of a module with respect to an ideal.
In this file we define the notions of Hausdorff, precomplete, and complete for an `R`-module `M`
with respect to an ideal `I`:
## Main definitions
- `is_Hausdorff I M`: this says that the intersection of `I^n M` is `0`.
- `is_precomplete I M`: this says that every Cauchy sequence converges.
- `is_adic_complete I M`: this says that `M` is Hausdorff and precomplete.
- `Hausdorffification I M`: this is the universal Hausdorff module with a map from `M`.
- `completion I M`: if `I` is finitely generated, then this is the universal complete module (TODO)
with a map from `M`. This map is injective iff `M` is Hausdorff and surjective iff `M` is
precomplete.
-/
open submodule
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R] (I : ideal R)
variables (M : Type*) [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
variables {N : Type*} [add_comm_group N] [module R N]
/-- A module `M` is Hausdorff with respect to an ideal `I` if `⋂ I^n M = 0`. -/
class is_Hausdorff : Prop :=
(haus' : ∀ x : M, (∀ n : ℕ, x ≡ 0 [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)]) → x = 0)
/-- A module `M` is precomplete with respect to an ideal `I` if every Cauchy sequence converges. -/
class is_precomplete : Prop :=
(prec' : ∀ f : ℕ → M,
(∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → f m ≡ f n [SMOD (I ^ m • ⊤ : submodule R M)]) →
∃ L : M, ∀ n, f n ≡ L [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)])
/-- A module `M` is `I`-adically complete if it is Hausdorff and precomplete. -/
class is_adic_complete extends is_Hausdorff I M, is_precomplete I M : Prop
variables {I M}
theorem is_Hausdorff.haus (h : is_Hausdorff I M) :
∀ x : M, (∀ n : ℕ, x ≡ 0 [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)]) → x = 0 := is_Hausdorff.haus'
theorem is_Hausdorff_iff : is_Hausdorff I M ↔
∀ x : M, (∀ n : ℕ, x ≡ 0 [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)]) → x = 0 :=
⟨is_Hausdorff.haus, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem is_precomplete.prec (h : is_precomplete I M) {f : ℕ → M} :
(∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → f m ≡ f n [SMOD (I ^ m • ⊤ : submodule R M)]) →
∃ L : M, ∀ n, f n ≡ L [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)] := is_precomplete.prec' _
theorem is_precomplete_iff : is_precomplete I M ↔ ∀ f : ℕ → M,
(∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → f m ≡ f n [SMOD (I ^ m • ⊤ : submodule R M)]) →
∃ L : M, ∀ n, f n ≡ L [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)] :=
⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
variables (I M)
/-- The Hausdorffification of a module with respect to an ideal. -/
@[reducible] def Hausdorffification : Type* :=
M ⧸ (⨅ n : ℕ, I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)
/-- The completion of a module with respect to an ideal. This is not necessarily Hausdorff.
In fact, this is only complete if the ideal is finitely generated. -/
def adic_completion : submodule R (Π n : ℕ, (M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M))) :=
{ carrier := { f | ∀ {m n} (h : m ≤ n), liftq _ (mkq _)
(by { rw ker_mkq, exact smul_mono (ideal.pow_le_pow h) le_rfl }) (f n) = f m },
zero_mem' := λ m n hmn, by rw [pi.zero_apply, pi.zero_apply, linear_map.map_zero],
add_mem' := λ f g hf hg m n hmn, by rw [pi.add_apply, pi.add_apply,
linear_map.map_add, hf hmn, hg hmn],
smul_mem' := λ c f hf m n hmn, by rw [pi.smul_apply, pi.smul_apply, linear_map.map_smul, hf hmn] }
namespace is_Hausdorff
instance bot : is_Hausdorff (⊥ : ideal R) M :=
⟨λ x hx, by simpa only [pow_one ⊥, bot_smul, smodeq.bot] using hx 1⟩
variables {M}
protected theorem subsingleton (h : is_Hausdorff (⊤ : ideal R) M) : subsingleton M :=
⟨λ x y, eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ h.haus (x - y) $ λ n,
by { rw [ideal.top_pow, top_smul], exact smodeq.top }⟩
variables (M)
@[priority 100] instance of_subsingleton [subsingleton M] : is_Hausdorff I M :=
⟨λ x _, subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
variables {I M}
theorem infi_pow_smul (h : is_Hausdorff I M) :
(⨅ n : ℕ, I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ x hx, (mem_bot _).2 $ h.haus x $ λ n, smodeq.zero.2 $
(mem_infi $ λ n : ℕ, I ^ n • ⊤).1 hx n
end is_Hausdorff
namespace Hausdorffification
/-- The canonical linear map to the Hausdorffification. -/
def of : M →ₗ[R] Hausdorffification I M := mkq _
variables {I M}
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction_on {C : Hausdorffification I M → Prop} (x : Hausdorffification I M)
(ih : ∀ x, C (of I M x)) : C x :=
quotient.induction_on' x ih
variables (I M)
instance : is_Hausdorff I (Hausdorffification I M) :=
⟨λ x, quotient.induction_on' x $ λ x hx, (quotient.mk_eq_zero _).2 $ (mem_infi _).2 $ λ n, begin
have := comap_map_mkq (⨅ n : ℕ, I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M) (I ^ n • ⊤),
simp only [sup_of_le_right (infi_le (λ n, (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)) n)] at this,
rw [← this, map_smul'', mem_comap, map_top, range_mkq, ← smodeq.zero], exact hx n
end⟩
variables {M} [h : is_Hausdorff I N]
include h
/-- universal property of Hausdorffification: any linear map to a Hausdorff module extends to a
unique map from the Hausdorffification. -/
def lift (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : Hausdorffification I M →ₗ[R] N :=
liftq _ f $ map_le_iff_le_comap.1 $ h.infi_pow_smul ▸ le_infi (λ n,
le_trans (map_mono $ infi_le _ n) $ by { rw map_smul'', exact smul_mono le_rfl le_top })
theorem lift_of (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (x : M) : lift I f (of I M x) = f x := rfl
theorem lift_comp_of (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : (lift I f).comp (of I M) = f :=
linear_map.ext $ λ _, rfl
/-- Uniqueness of lift. -/
theorem lift_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : Hausdorffification I M →ₗ[R] N) (hg : g.comp (of I M) = f) :
g = lift I f :=
linear_map.ext $ λ x, induction_on x $ λ x, by rw [lift_of, ← hg, linear_map.comp_apply]
end Hausdorffification
namespace is_precomplete
instance bot : is_precomplete (⊥ : ideal R) M :=
begin
refine ⟨λ f hf, ⟨f 1, λ n, _⟩⟩, cases n,
{ rw [pow_zero, ideal.one_eq_top, top_smul], exact smodeq.top },
specialize hf (nat.le_add_left 1 n),
rw [pow_one, bot_smul, smodeq.bot] at hf, rw hf
end
instance top : is_precomplete (⊤ : ideal R) M :=
⟨λ f hf, ⟨0, λ n, by { rw [ideal.top_pow, top_smul], exact smodeq.top }⟩⟩
@[priority 100] instance of_subsingleton [subsingleton M] : is_precomplete I M :=
⟨λ f hf, ⟨0, λ n, by rw subsingleton.elim (f n) 0⟩⟩
end is_precomplete
namespace adic_completion
/-- The canonical linear map to the completion. -/
def of : M →ₗ[R] adic_completion I M :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨λ n, mkq _ x, λ m n hmn, rfl⟩,
map_add' := λ x y, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c x, rfl }
@[simp] lemma of_apply (x : M) (n : ℕ) : (of I M x).1 n = mkq _ x := rfl
/-- Linearly evaluating a sequence in the completion at a given input. -/
def eval (n : ℕ) : adic_completion I M →ₗ[R] (M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M)) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f.1 n,
map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl }
@[simp] lemma coe_eval (n : ℕ) :
(eval I M n : adic_completion I M → (M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : submodule R M))) = λ f, f.1 n := rfl
lemma eval_apply (n : ℕ) (f : adic_completion I M) : eval I M n f = f.1 n := rfl
lemma eval_of (n : ℕ) (x : M) : eval I M n (of I M x) = mkq _ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma eval_comp_of (n : ℕ) : (eval I M n).comp (of I M) = mkq _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma range_eval (n : ℕ) : (eval I M n).range = ⊤ :=
linear_map.range_eq_top.2 $ λ x, quotient.induction_on' x $ λ x, ⟨of I M x, rfl⟩
variables {I M}
@[ext] lemma ext {x y : adic_completion I M} (h : ∀ n, eval I M n x = eval I M n y) : x = y :=
subtype.eq $ funext h
variables (I M)
instance : is_Hausdorff I (adic_completion I M) :=
⟨λ x hx, ext $ λ n, smul_induction_on (smodeq.zero.1 $ hx n)
(λ r hr x _, ((eval I M n).map_smul r x).symm ▸ quotient.induction_on' (eval I M n x)
(λ x, smodeq.zero.2 $ smul_mem_smul hr mem_top))
(λ _ _ ih1 ih2, by rw [linear_map.map_add, ih1, ih2, linear_map.map_zero, add_zero])⟩
end adic_completion
namespace is_adic_complete
instance bot : is_adic_complete (⊥ : ideal R) M := {}
protected theorem subsingleton (h : is_adic_complete (⊤ : ideal R) M) : subsingleton M :=
h.1.subsingleton
@[priority 100] instance of_subsingleton [subsingleton M] : is_adic_complete I M := {}
open_locale big_operators
open finset
lemma le_jacobson_bot [is_adic_complete I R] : I ≤ (⊥ : ideal R).jacobson :=
begin
intros x hx,
rw [← ideal.neg_mem_iff, ideal.mem_jacobson_bot],
intros y,
rw add_comm,
let f : ℕ → R := λ n, ∑ i in range n, (x * y) ^ i,
have hf : ∀ m n, m ≤ n → f m ≡ f n [SMOD I ^ m • (⊤ : submodule R R)],
{ intros m n h,
simp only [f, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, ideal.mul_top, smodeq.sub_mem],
rw [← add_tsub_cancel_of_le h, finset.sum_range_add, ← sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub,
neg_mem_iff],
apply submodule.sum_mem,
intros n hn,
rw [mul_pow, pow_add, mul_assoc],
exact ideal.mul_mem_right _ (I ^ m) (ideal.pow_mem_pow hx m) },
obtain ⟨L, hL⟩ := is_precomplete.prec to_is_precomplete hf,
{ rw is_unit_iff_exists_inv,
use L,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, neg_mul],
apply is_Hausdorff.haus (to_is_Hausdorff : is_Hausdorff I R),
intros n,
specialize hL n,
rw [smodeq.sub_mem, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, ideal.mul_top] at ⊢ hL,
rw sub_zero,
suffices : (1 - x * y) * (f n) - 1 ∈ I ^ n,
{ convert (ideal.sub_mem _ this (ideal.mul_mem_left _ (1 + - (x * y)) hL)) using 1,
ring },
cases n,
{ simp only [ideal.one_eq_top, pow_zero] },
{ dsimp [f],
rw [← neg_sub _ (1:R), neg_mul, mul_geom_sum, neg_sub,
sub_sub, add_comm, ← sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub, neg_mem_iff, mul_pow],
exact ideal.mul_mem_right _ (I ^ _) (ideal.pow_mem_pow hx _), } },
end
end is_adic_complete
|
cc25c6a53ec49efe2007dca6a84692769c18b7b6 | da23b545e1653cafd4ab88b3a42b9115a0b1355f | /src/tidy/lock_tactic_state.lean | cccd9149823330d13d98b33d82bc91051ad2c3e9 | [] | no_license | minchaowu/lean-tidy | 137f5058896e0e81dae84bf8d02b74101d21677a | 2d4c52d66cf07c59f8746e405ba861b4fa0e3835 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,283,406,120 | 1,535,094,033,000 | 1,535,094,033,000 | 145,945,792 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 438 | lean | /-- This makes sure that the execution of the tactic does not change the tactic state.
This can be helpful while using rewrite, apply, or expr munging.
Remember to instantiate your metavariables before you're done! -/
meta def lock_tactic_state {α} (t : tactic α) : tactic α
| s := match t s with
| result.success a s' := result.success a s
| result.exception msg pos s' := result.exception msg pos s
end
|
babf81e304e09c58049464c8e96cf745129b208f | 750acab0c635b67751bcfec43c5411aa3941c441 | /q_fourier_xform.lean | ef13dc30e495235ba245922e8275b5aa259a9488 | [] | no_license | nthomas103/lean_work | 912f8e662cdd73ba97f5d3655ddb8a5d2cd204c9 | 7e9785cae2b60a77b41922fd5d5b159a1fae415c | refs/heads/master | 1,586,739,169,355 | 1,455,759,226,000 | 1,455,759,226,000 | 50,978,095 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,408 | lean | import standard data.matrix
open nat matrix matrix.ops real complex fin
open sigma prod prod.ops sigma.ops list
definition mx [reducible] (d : ℕ × ℕ) := matrix ℂ d.1 d.2
constant tensor_product {da db}
(A : mx da) (B : mx db) : mx (da.1*db.1,da.2*db.2)
infixl `⊗`:100 := tensor_product
constant mx_one : mx (1,1)
definition Imx {n} : mx (n,n) := @I ℂ _ n
definition mx_to_sigma [coercion] [reducible]
{d} (M : mx d) : sigma mx := ⟨_,M⟩
definition tensor_bigop_aux (l : list (sigma mx)) :=
list.foldl
(λ M N, ⟨_, M.2 ⊗ N.2⟩) ⟨_, mx_one⟩ l
definition tensor_bigop (l : list (sigma mx)) := (tensor_bigop_aux l).2
prefix `⊗` := tensor_bigop
constant (M₁ : mx (2,2))
constant (M₂ : mx (4,4))
eval (mx_to_sigma (matrix.mul (⊗ [M₂, M₁, M₂]) Imx)).1.1
definition conj_transpose {n} (M : mx (n,n)) : mx (n,n) :=
λ i j, conj (M[j, i])
postfix `†`:2000 := conj_transpose
structure is_unitary [class] {n} (U : mx (n,n)) :=
(uni_right : U * U† = I)
(uni_left : U† * U = I)
noncomputable definition mul_unitary {n} (U₁ U₂ : mx (n,n))
[is_unitary U₁] [is_unitary U₂] : is_unitary (U₁ * U₂) := sorry
definition stack_unitary {m n}
(U₁ : mx (m,m)) (U₂ : mx (n,n))
[is_unitary U₁] [is_unitary U₂] : is_unitary (U₁ ⊗ U₂) := sorry
definition gate := Σ (U : mx (2,2)), is_unitary U
definition qcirc (n) := Σ (U : mx (2^n,2^n)), is_unitary U
noncomputable definition qcirc_comp
{n} (q₁ : qcirc n) (q₂ : qcirc n) : qcirc n :=
⟨matrix.mul q₂.1 q₁.1, @mul_unitary _ q₂.1 q₁.1 q₂.2 q₁.2⟩
infixl `**`:97 := qcirc_comp
definition qcirc_stack
{m n} (q₁ : qcirc m) (q₂ : qcirc n) : qcirc (m + n) :=
sorry--⟨q₁.1 ⊗ q₂.1, @stack_unitary _ _ q₁.1 q₂.1 q₁.2 q₂.2⟩
infixl `⊗`:100 := qcirc_stack
lemma I_unitary {n} : @is_unitary n Imx := sorry
noncomputable definition Ic {n} : qcirc n := ⟨Imx, I_unitary⟩
lemma slide {m n} (q₁ : qcirc m) (q₂ : qcirc n) :
(q₁ ⊗ Ic) ** (Ic ⊗ q₂) =
(Ic ⊗ q₂) ** (q₁ ⊗ Ic) := sorry
constant π : ℝ
constant H : gate
constant R : ℝ → gate
--constant swap : mx (4,4)
constant gate_circ {n} (g : fin n) (U : gate) : qcirc n
constant cgate {n} (c g : fin n) (U : gate) : qcirc n
constant cast_qcirc {m n} (q : qcirc m) (h : m = n) : qcirc n
noncomputable definition qft_helper : ∀ n, qcirc (n+1)
| 0 := gate_circ (fin.mk 0 sorry) H
| (m+1) := (cgate (fin.mk 0 sorry) (fin.mk (m+1) sorry) (R (π / 2^(m+1))))
** ((qft_helper m) ⊗ Ic)
noncomputable definition qft : ∀ n, qcirc (n+1)
| 0 := qft_helper 0
| (m+1) := cast_qcirc ((cast_qcirc ((@Ic 1) ⊗ (qft m)) (by inst_simp)) **
(qft_helper (m+1))) (by inst_simp)
--some other matrix stuff
definition matrix_inv [instance] {T : Type} [comm_ring T] {n} :
has_inv (matrix T n n) := sorry
constant det {T : Type} [comm_ring T] {m} (A : matrix T m m) : T
notation `|`A`|` := det A
noncomputable definition kron_sum {m n}
(A : mx (n,n)) (B : mx (m,m)) : mx ((n*m),(n*m)) :=
A ⊗ I + I ⊗ B
infixl `⊕`:100 := kron_sum
section
variables {T : Type} [comm_ring T]
variables {m n p q r s: ℕ}
lemma t_left_distrib (A B : mx (m,n)) (C : mx (p,q)) :
(A + B) ⊗ C = A ⊗ C + B ⊗ C := sorry
lemma t_right_distrib (A : matrix T m n) (B C : matrix T p q) :
A ⊗ (B + C) = A ⊗ B + A ⊗ C := sorry
lemma t_left_smul (k : T) (A : matrix T m n) (B : matrix T p q) :
(k ⬝A) ⊗ B = k ⬝(A ⊗ B) := sorry
lemma t_right_smul (k : T) (A : matrix T m n) (B : matrix T p q) :
A ⊗ (k ⬝B) = k ⬝(A ⊗ B) := sorry
lemma t_assoc (A : matrix T m n) (B : matrix T p q) (C : matrix T r s) :
(A ⊗ B) ⊗ C == A ⊗ (B ⊗ C) := sorry
lemma t_mul (A : matrix T m n) (B : matrix T q r)
(C : matrix T n p) (D : matrix T r s) :
matrix.mul (A ⊗ B) (C ⊗ D) = (matrix.mul A C) ⊗ (matrix.mul B D) :=
sorry
lemma t_inverse (A : matrix T m m) (B : matrix T n n) :
(A ⊗ B)⁻¹ = A⁻¹ ⊗ B⁻¹ := sorry
postfix `ᵀ`:1500 := transpose
lemma t_trans (A : matrix T m n) (B : matrix T p q) :
(A ⊗ B)ᵀ = Aᵀ ⊗ Bᵀ := sorry
lemma t_det (A : matrix T m m) (B : matrix T n n) :
|A ⊗ B| = |A|^n * |B|^m := sorry
end
|
aef8d4f6ecaaee0193b1d2467d1f329a72dc4483 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/number_theory/sum_four_squares.lean | 3b298a43a83dce8b1039814200d9ee0a841f60a7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,810 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import algebra.group_power.identities
import data.zmod.basic
import field_theory.finite.basic
import data.int.parity
import data.fintype.card
/-!
# Lagrange's four square theorem
The main result in this file is `sum_four_squares`,
a proof that every natural number is the sum of four square numbers.
## Implementation Notes
The proof used is close to Lagrange's original proof.
-/
open finset polynomial finite_field equiv
open_locale big_operators
namespace int
lemma sq_add_sq_of_two_mul_sq_add_sq {m x y : ℤ} (h : 2 * m = x^2 + y^2) :
m = ((x - y) / 2) ^ 2 + ((x + y) / 2) ^ 2 :=
have even (x^2 + y^2), by simp [h.symm, even_mul],
have hxaddy : even (x + y), by simpa [sq] with parity_simps,
have hxsuby : even (x - y), by simpa [sq] with parity_simps,
(mul_right_inj' (show (2*2 : ℤ) ≠ 0, from dec_trivial)).1 $
calc 2 * 2 * m = (x - y)^2 + (x + y)^2 : by rw [mul_assoc, h]; ring
... = (2 * ((x - y) / 2))^2 + (2 * ((x + y) / 2))^2 :
by rw [int.mul_div_cancel' hxsuby, int.mul_div_cancel' hxaddy]
... = 2 * 2 * (((x - y) / 2) ^ 2 + ((x + y) / 2) ^ 2) :
by simp [mul_add, pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
lemma exists_sq_add_sq_add_one_eq_k (p : ℕ) [hp : fact p.prime] :
∃ (a b : ℤ) (k : ℕ), a^2 + b^2 + 1 = k * p ∧ k < p :=
hp.1.eq_two_or_odd.elim (λ hp2, hp2.symm ▸ ⟨1, 0, 1, rfl, dec_trivial⟩) $ λ hp1,
let ⟨a, b, hab⟩ := zmod.sq_add_sq p (-1) in
have hab' : (p : ℤ) ∣ a.val_min_abs ^ 2 + b.val_min_abs ^ 2 + 1,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod p) p _).1 $ by simpa [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero] using hab,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hab' in
have hk0 : 0 ≤ k, from nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left
(by rw ← hk; exact (add_nonneg (add_nonneg (sq_nonneg _) (sq_nonneg _)) zero_le_one))
(int.coe_nat_pos.2 hp.1.pos),
⟨a.val_min_abs, b.val_min_abs, k.nat_abs,
by rw [hk, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hk0, mul_comm],
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
(calc p * k.nat_abs = a.val_min_abs.nat_abs ^ 2 + b.val_min_abs.nat_abs ^ 2 + 1 :
by rw [← int.coe_nat_inj', int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_pow,
int.coe_nat_pow, int.nat_abs_sq, int.nat_abs_sq,
int.coe_nat_one, hk, int.coe_nat_mul, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hk0]
... ≤ (p / 2) ^ 2 + (p / 2)^2 + 1 :
add_le_add
(add_le_add
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _)
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _))
(le_refl _)
... < (p / 2) ^ 2 + (p / 2)^ 2 + (p % 2)^2 + ((2 * (p / 2)^2 + (4 * (p / 2) * (p % 2)))) :
by rw [hp1, one_pow, mul_one];
exact (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2
(add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (nat.zero_le _) (mul_pos dec_trivial
(nat.div_pos hp.1.two_le dec_trivial)))
... = p * p : by { conv_rhs { rw [← nat.mod_add_div p 2] }, ring })
(show 0 ≤ p, from nat.zero_le _)⟩
end int
namespace nat
open int
open_locale classical
private lemma sum_four_squares_of_two_mul_sum_four_squares {m a b c d : ℤ}
(h : a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = 2 * m) : ∃ w x y z : ℤ, w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = m :=
have ∀ f : fin 4 → zmod 2, (f 0)^2 + (f 1)^2 + (f 2)^2 + (f 3)^2 = 0 →
∃ i : (fin 4), (f i)^2 + f (swap i 0 1)^2 = 0 ∧ f (swap i 0 2)^2 + f (swap i 0 3)^2 = 0,
from dec_trivial,
let f : fin 4 → ℤ :=
vector.nth (a ::ᵥ b ::ᵥ c ::ᵥ d ::ᵥ vector.nil) in
let ⟨i, hσ⟩ := this (coe ∘ f) (by rw [← @zero_mul (zmod 2) _ m,
← show ((2 : ℤ) : zmod 2) = 0, from rfl,
← int.cast_mul, ← h]; simp only [int.cast_add, int.cast_pow]; refl) in
let σ := swap i 0 in
have h01 : 2 ∣ f (σ 0) ^ 2 + f (σ 1) ^ 2,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod 2) 2 _).1 $ by simpa [σ] using hσ.1,
have h23 : 2 ∣ f (σ 2) ^ 2 + f (σ 3) ^ 2,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod 2) 2 _).1 $ by simpa using hσ.2,
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h01 in let ⟨y, hy⟩ := h23 in
⟨(f (σ 0) - f (σ 1)) / 2, (f (σ 0) + f (σ 1)) / 2, (f (σ 2) - f (σ 3)) / 2, (f (σ 2) + f (σ 3)) / 2,
begin
rw [← int.sq_add_sq_of_two_mul_sq_add_sq hx.symm, add_assoc,
← int.sq_add_sq_of_two_mul_sq_add_sq hy.symm,
← mul_right_inj' (show (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0, from dec_trivial), ← h, mul_add, ← hx, ← hy],
have : ∑ x, f (σ x)^2 = ∑ x, f x^2,
{ conv_rhs { rw ← σ.sum_comp } },
have fin4univ : (univ : finset (fin 4)).1 = 0 ::ₘ 1 ::ₘ 2 ::ₘ 3 ::ₘ 0, from dec_trivial,
simpa [finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, fin4univ, multiset.sum_cons, f, add_assoc]
end⟩
private lemma prime_sum_four_squares (p : ℕ) [hp : _root_.fact p.prime] :
∃ a b c d : ℤ, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = p :=
have hm : ∃ m < p, 0 < m ∧ ∃ a b c d : ℤ, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = m * p,
from let ⟨a, b, k, hk⟩ := exists_sq_add_sq_add_one_eq_k p in
⟨k, hk.2, nat.pos_of_ne_zero $
(λ hk0, by { rw [hk0, int.coe_nat_zero, zero_mul] at hk,
exact ne_of_gt (show a^2 + b^2 + 1 > 0, from add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos
(add_nonneg (sq_nonneg _) (sq_nonneg _)) zero_lt_one) hk.1 }),
a, b, 1, 0, by simpa [sq] using hk.1⟩,
let m := nat.find hm in
let ⟨a, b, c, d, (habcd : a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = m * p)⟩ := (nat.find_spec hm).snd.2 in
by haveI hm0 : _root_.fact (0 < m) := ⟨(nat.find_spec hm).snd.1⟩; exact
have hmp : m < p, from (nat.find_spec hm).fst,
m.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one.elim
(λ hm2 : m % 2 = 0,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := (nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).2 hm2 in
have hk0 : 0 < k, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero $ λ _, by { simp [*, lt_irrefl] at * },
have hkm : k < m, { rw [hk, two_mul], exact (lt_add_iff_pos_left _).2 hk0 },
false.elim $ nat.find_min hm hkm ⟨lt_trans hkm hmp, hk0,
sum_four_squares_of_two_mul_sum_four_squares
(show a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = 2 * (k * p),
by { rw [habcd, hk, int.coe_nat_mul, mul_assoc], simp })⟩)
(λ hm2 : m % 2 = 1,
if hm1 : m = 1 then ⟨a, b, c, d, by simp only [hm1, habcd, int.coe_nat_one, one_mul]⟩
else
let w := (a : zmod m).val_min_abs, x := (b : zmod m).val_min_abs,
y := (c : zmod m).val_min_abs, z := (d : zmod m).val_min_abs in
have hnat_abs : w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 =
(w.nat_abs^2 + x.nat_abs^2 + y.nat_abs ^2 + z.nat_abs ^ 2 : ℕ),
by simp [sq],
have hwxyzlt : w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 < m^2,
from calc w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2
= (w.nat_abs^2 + x.nat_abs^2 + y.nat_abs ^2 + z.nat_abs ^ 2 : ℕ) : hnat_abs
... ≤ ((m / 2) ^ 2 + (m / 2) ^ 2 + (m / 2) ^ 2 + (m / 2) ^ 2 : ℕ) :
int.coe_nat_le.2 $ add_le_add (add_le_add (add_le_add
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _)
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _))
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _))
(nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_left (zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le _) _)
... = 4 * (m / 2 : ℕ) ^ 2 : by simp [sq, bit0, bit1, mul_add, add_mul, add_assoc]
... < 4 * (m / 2 : ℕ) ^ 2 + ((4 * (m / 2) : ℕ) * (m % 2 : ℕ) + (m % 2 : ℕ)^2) :
(lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 (by { rw [hm2, int.coe_nat_one, one_pow, mul_one],
exact add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (int.coe_nat_nonneg _) zero_lt_one })
... = m ^ 2 : by { conv_rhs {rw [← nat.mod_add_div m 2]},
simp [-nat.mod_add_div, mul_add, add_mul, bit0, bit1, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm,
pow_add, add_comm, add_left_comm] },
have hwxyzabcd : ((w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 : ℤ) : zmod m) =
((a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 : ℤ) : zmod m),
by simp [w, x, y, z, sq],
have hwxyz0 : ((w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 : ℤ) : zmod m) = 0,
by rw [hwxyzabcd, habcd, int.cast_mul, cast_coe_nat, zmod.nat_cast_self, zero_mul],
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ((char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff _ m _).1 hwxyz0) in
have hn0 : 0 < n.nat_abs, from int.nat_abs_pos_of_ne_zero (λ hn0,
have hwxyz0 : (w.nat_abs^2 + x.nat_abs^2 + y.nat_abs^2 + z.nat_abs^2 : ℕ) = 0,
by { rw [← int.coe_nat_eq_zero, ← hnat_abs], rwa [hn0, mul_zero] at hn },
have habcd0 : (m : ℤ) ∣ a ∧ (m : ℤ) ∣ b ∧ (m : ℤ) ∣ c ∧ (m : ℤ) ∣ d,
by simpa [@add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_nonneg ℤ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (pow_two_nonneg _)
(pow_two_nonneg _),
pow_two, w, x, y, z, (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff _ m _), and.assoc] using hwxyz0,
let ⟨ma, hma⟩ := habcd0.1, ⟨mb, hmb⟩ := habcd0.2.1,
⟨mc, hmc⟩ := habcd0.2.2.1, ⟨md, hmd⟩ := habcd0.2.2.2 in
have hmdvdp : m ∣ p,
from int.coe_nat_dvd.1 ⟨ma^2 + mb^2 + mc^2 + md^2,
(mul_right_inj' (show (m : ℤ) ≠ 0, from int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 hm0.1)).1 $
by { rw [← habcd, hma, hmb, hmc, hmd], ring }⟩,
(hp.1.2 _ hmdvdp).elim hm1 (λ hmeqp, by simpa [lt_irrefl, hmeqp] using hmp)),
have hawbxcydz : ((m : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a * w + b * x + c * y + d * z,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod m) m _).1 $ by { rw [← hwxyz0], simp, ring },
have haxbwczdy : ((m : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a * x - b * w - c * z + d * y,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod m) m _).1 $ by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg], ring },
have haybzcwdx : ((m : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a * y + b * z - c * w - d * x,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod m) m _).1 $ by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg], ring },
have hazbycxdw : ((m : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a * z - b * y + c * x - d * w,
from (char_p.int_cast_eq_zero_iff (zmod m) m _).1 $ by { simp [sub_eq_add_neg], ring },
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hawbxcydz, ⟨t, ht⟩ := haxbwczdy, ⟨u, hu⟩ := haybzcwdx, ⟨v, hv⟩ := hazbycxdw in
have hn_nonneg : 0 ≤ n,
from nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left
(by { erw [← hn], repeat {try {refine add_nonneg _ _}, try {exact sq_nonneg _}} })
(int.coe_nat_pos.2 hm0.1),
have hnm : n.nat_abs < m,
from int.coe_nat_lt.1 (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
(by { rw [int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hn_nonneg, ← hn, ← sq], exact hwxyzlt })
(int.coe_nat_nonneg m)),
have hstuv : s^2 + t^2 + u^2 + v^2 = n.nat_abs * p,
from (mul_right_inj' (show (m^2 : ℤ) ≠ 0, from pow_ne_zero 2
(int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 hm0.1))).1 $
calc (m : ℤ)^2 * (s^2 + t^2 + u^2 + v^2) = ((m : ℕ) * s)^2 + ((m : ℕ) * t)^2 +
((m : ℕ) * u)^2 + ((m : ℕ) * v)^2 :
by { simp [mul_pow], ring }
... = (w^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2) * (a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2) :
by { simp only [hs.symm, ht.symm, hu.symm, hv.symm], ring }
... = _ : by { rw [hn, habcd, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg hn_nonneg], dsimp [m], ring },
false.elim $ nat.find_min hm hnm ⟨lt_trans hnm hmp, hn0, s, t, u, v, hstuv⟩)
lemma sum_four_squares : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ a b c d : ℕ, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = n
| 0 := ⟨0, 0, 0, 0, rfl⟩
| 1 := ⟨1, 0, 0, 0, rfl⟩
| n@(k+2) :=
have hm : _root_.fact (min_fac (k+2)).prime := ⟨min_fac_prime dec_trivial⟩,
have n / min_fac n < n := factors_lemma,
let ⟨a, b, c, d, h₁⟩ := show ∃ a b c d : ℤ, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 = min_fac n,
by exactI prime_sum_four_squares (min_fac (k+2)) in
let ⟨w, x, y, z, h₂⟩ := sum_four_squares (n / min_fac n) in
⟨(a * w - b * x - c * y - d * z).nat_abs,
(a * x + b * w + c * z - d * y).nat_abs,
(a * y - b * z + c * w + d * x).nat_abs,
(a * z + b * y - c * x + d * w).nat_abs,
begin
rw [← int.coe_nat_inj', ← nat.mul_div_cancel' (min_fac_dvd (k+2)), int.coe_nat_mul, ← h₁, ← h₂],
simp [sum_four_sq_mul_sum_four_sq],
end⟩
end nat
|
39abcced58824aaa3b6f2f42dfdf5c0fad016a09 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Parser/Level.lean | dc71411c0b98e43967e777eac9e0374010e2fee5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 994 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Parser.Parser
namespace Lean
namespace Parser
@[init] def regBuiltinLevelParserAttr : IO Unit :=
registerBuiltinParserAttribute `builtinLevelParser `level
@[inline] def levelParser (rbp : Nat := 0) : Parser :=
categoryParser `level rbp
namespace Level
@[builtinLevelParser] def paren := parser! symbol "(" appPrec >> levelParser >> ")"
@[builtinLevelParser] def max := parser! nonReservedSymbol "max " true >> many1 (levelParser appPrec)
@[builtinLevelParser] def imax := parser! "imax" >> many1 (levelParser appPrec)
@[builtinLevelParser] def hole := parser! "_"
@[builtinLevelParser] def num := parser! numLit
@[builtinLevelParser] def ident := parser! ident
@[builtinLevelParser] def addLit := tparser! symbol "+" (65:Nat) >> numLit
end Level
end Parser
end Lean
|
061699893ce17055f4abdd64f89cfaf2240ccb9d | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/expandWhereStructInstIssue.lean | d8c9ea2406b7355137acc3473019121c428f13a0 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 117 | lean | instance [Alternative m] : MonadLiftT Option m where
monadLift := fun
| some a => pure a
| none => failure
|
bd71773ccc8f44c3e43e19148de45b9fbdd08d55 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /tests/lean/mvar3.lean | a5494cf603e132976cfba2269c402e9fd61188b8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,852 | lean | import Init.Lean.MetavarContext
open Lean
def mkLambdaTest (mctx : MetavarContext) (ngen : NameGenerator) (lctx : LocalContext) (xs : Array Expr) (e : Expr)
: Except MetavarContext.MkBinding.Exception (MetavarContext × NameGenerator × Expr) :=
match MetavarContext.mkLambda xs e lctx { mctx := mctx, ngen := ngen } with
| EStateM.Result.ok e s => Except.ok (s.mctx, s.ngen, e)
| EStateM.Result.error e s => Except.error e
def check (b : Bool) : IO Unit :=
unless b (throw $ IO.userError "error")
def f := mkConst `f
def g := mkConst `g
def a := mkConst `a
def b := mkConst `b
def c := mkConst `c
def b0 := mkBVar 0
def b1 := mkBVar 1
def b2 := mkBVar 2
def u := mkLevelParam `u
def typeE := mkSort levelOne
def natE := mkConst `Nat
def boolE := mkConst `Bool
def vecE := mkConst `Vec [levelZero]
def α := mkFVar `α
def x := mkFVar `x
def y := mkFVar `y
def z := mkFVar `z
def w := mkFVar `w
def m1 := mkMVar `m1
def m2 := mkMVar `m2
def m3 := mkMVar `m3
def bi := BinderInfo.default
def arrow (d b : Expr) := mkForall `_ bi d b
def lctx1 : LocalContext := {}
def lctx2 := lctx1.mkLocalDecl `α `α typeE
def lctx3 := lctx2.mkLocalDecl `x `x m1
def lctx4 := lctx3.mkLocalDecl `y `y (arrow natE m2)
def mctx1 : MetavarContext := {}
def mctx2 := mctx1.addExprMVarDecl `m1 `m1 lctx2 #[] typeE
def mctx3 := mctx2.addExprMVarDecl `m2 `m2 lctx3 #[] natE
def mctx4 := mctx3.addExprMVarDecl `m3 `m3 lctx3 #[] natE
def mctx4' := mctx3.addExprMVarDecl `m3 `m3 lctx3 #[] natE MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque
def R1 :=
match mkLambdaTest mctx4 {namePrefix := `n} lctx4 #[α, x, y] $ mkAppN f #[m3, x] with
| Except.ok s => s
| Except.error e => panic! (toString e)
def e1 := R1.2.2
def mctx5 := R1.1
def sortNames (xs : List Name) : List Name :=
(xs.toArray.qsort Name.lt).toList
def sortNamePairs {α} [Inhabited α] (xs : List (Name × α)) : List (Name × α) :=
(xs.toArray.qsort (fun a b => Name.lt a.1 b.1)).toList
#eval toString $ sortNames $ mctx5.decls.toList.map Prod.fst
#eval toString $ sortNamePairs $ mctx5.eAssignment.toList
#eval e1
#eval check (!e1.hasFVar)
def R2 :=
match mkLambdaTest mctx4' {namePrefix := `n} lctx4 #[α, x, y] $ mkAppN f #[m3, y] with
| Except.ok s => s
| Except.error e => panic! (toString e)
def e2 := R2.2.2
def mctx6 := R2.1
#eval toString $ sortNames $ mctx6.decls.toList.map Prod.fst
#eval toString $ sortNamePairs $ mctx6.eAssignment.toList
-- ?n.2 was delayed assigned because ?m.3 is synthetic
#eval toString $ sortNames $ mctx6.dAssignment.toList.map Prod.fst
#eval e2
#print "assigning ?m1 and ?n.1"
def R3 :=
let mctx := mctx6.assignExpr `m3 x;
let mctx := mctx.assignExpr (mkNameNum `n 1) (mkLambda `_ bi typeE natE);
-- ?n.2 is instantiated because we have the delayed assignment `?n.2 α x := ?m1`
(mctx.instantiateMVars e2)
def e3 := R3.1
def mctx7 := R3.2
#eval e3
|
3bfdd91901b65a91f5ad335b7ebd481e7516326a | 88fb7558b0636ec6b181f2a548ac11ad3919f8a5 | /library/tools/super/clausifier.lean | 1cf04009ad3ead9992c6e3eb5bb9550f43819049 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | moritayasuaki/lean | 9f666c323cb6fa1f31ac597d777914aed41e3b7a | ae96ebf6ee953088c235ff7ae0e8c95066ba8001 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,135,440,814 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 90,269,903 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,493,906,291,000 | 1,493,906,291,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,792 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner
-/
import .clause .clause_ops
import .prover_state .misc_preprocessing
open expr list tactic monad decidable
universe u
namespace super
meta def try_option {a : Type u} (tac : tactic a) : tactic (option a) :=
lift some tac <|> return none
private meta def normalize : expr → tactic expr | e := do
e' ← whnf e reducible,
args' ← monad.for e'.get_app_args normalize,
return $ app_of_list e'.get_app_fn args'
meta def inf_normalize_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left c $ λtype, do
type' ← normalize type,
guard $ type' ≠ type,
h ← mk_local_def `h type',
return [([h], h)]
meta def inf_normalize_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_right c $ λha, do
a' ← normalize ha.local_type,
guard $ a' ≠ ha.local_type,
hna ← mk_local_def `hna (imp a' c.local_false),
return [([hna], app hna ha)]
meta def inf_false_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
first $ do i ← list.range c.num_lits,
if c.get_lit i = clause.literal.left ```(false)
then [return []]
else []
meta def inf_false_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_right c $ λhf,
if hf.local_type = c.local_false
then return [([], hf)]
else match hf.local_type with
| const ``false [] := do
pr ← mk_app ``false.rec [c.local_false, hf],
return [([], pr)]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_true_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left c $ λt,
match t with
| (const ``true []) := return [([], const ``true.intro [])]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_true_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
first $ do i ← list.range c.num_lits,
if c.get_lit i = clause.literal.right (const ``true [])
then [return []]
else []
meta def inf_not_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left c $ λtype,
match type with
| app (const ``not []) a := do
hna ← mk_local_def `h ```(%%a → false),
return [([hna], hna)]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_not_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_right c $ λhna,
match hna.local_type with
| app (const ``not []) a := do
hnna ← mk_local_def `h ```((%%a → false) → %%c.local_false),
return [([hnna], app hnna hna)]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_and_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left c $ λab,
match ab with
| (app (app (const ``and []) a) b) := do
ha ← mk_local_def `l a,
hb ← mk_local_def `r b,
pab ← mk_mapp ``and.intro [some a, some b, some ha, some hb],
return [([ha, hb], pab)]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_and_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_right' c $ λhyp, do
pa ← mk_mapp ``and.left [none, none, some hyp],
pb ← mk_mapp ``and.right [none, none, some hyp],
return [([], pa), ([], pb)]
meta def inf_iff_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left c $ λab,
match ab with
| (app (app (const ``iff []) a) b) := do
hab ← mk_local_def `l (imp a b),
hba ← mk_local_def `r (imp b a),
pab ← mk_mapp ``iff.intro [some a, some b, some hab, some hba],
return [([hab, hba], pab)]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_iff_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_right' c $ λhyp, do
pa ← mk_mapp ``iff.mp [none, none, some hyp],
pb ← mk_mapp ``iff.mpr [none, none, some hyp],
return [([], pa), ([], pb)]
meta def inf_or_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_right c $ λhab,
match hab.local_type with
| (app (app (const ``or []) a) b) := do
hna ← mk_local_def `l (imp a c.local_false),
hnb ← mk_local_def `r (imp b c.local_false),
proof ← mk_app ``or.elim [a, b, c.local_false, hab, hna, hnb],
return [([hna, hnb], proof)]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_or_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left c $ λab,
match ab with
| (app (app (const ``or []) a) b) := do
ha ← mk_local_def `l a,
hb ← mk_local_def `l b,
pa ← mk_mapp ``or.inl [some a, some b, some ha],
pb ← mk_mapp ``or.inr [some a, some b, some hb],
return [([ha], pa), ([hb], pb)]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_all_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_right' c $ λhallb,
match hallb.local_type with
| (pi n bi a b) := do
ha ← mk_local_def `x a,
return [([ha], app hallb ha)]
| _ := failed
end
lemma imp_l {F a b} [decidable a] : ((a → b) → F) → ((a → F) → F) :=
λhabf haf, decidable.by_cases
(assume ha : a, haf ha)
(assume hna : ¬a, habf (take ha, absurd ha hna))
lemma imp_l' {F a b} [decidable F] : ((a → b) → F) → ((a → F) → F) :=
λhabf haf, decidable.by_cases
(assume hf : F, hf)
(assume hnf : ¬F, habf (take ha, absurd (haf ha) hnf))
lemma imp_l_c {F : Prop} {a b} : ((a → b) → F) → ((a → F) → F) :=
λhabf haf, classical.by_cases
(assume hf : F, hf)
(assume hnf : ¬F, habf (take ha, absurd (haf ha) hnf))
meta def inf_imp_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left_dn c $ λhnab,
match hnab.local_type with
| (pi _ _ (pi _ _ a b) _) :=
if b.has_var then failed else do
hna ← mk_local_def `na (imp a c.local_false),
pf ← first (do r ← [``super.imp_l, ``super.imp_l', ``super.imp_l_c],
[mk_app r [hnab, hna]]),
hb ← mk_local_def `b b,
return [([hna], pf), ([hb], app hnab (lam `a binder_info.default a hb))]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_ex_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left c $ λexp,
match exp with
| (app (app (const ``Exists [u]) dom) pred) := do
hx ← mk_local_def `x dom,
predx ← whnf $ app pred hx,
hpx ← mk_local_def `hpx predx,
return [([hx,hpx], app_of_list (const ``exists.intro [u])
[dom, pred, hx, hpx])]
| _ := failed
end
lemma demorgan' {F a} {b : a → Prop} : ((∀x, b x) → F) → (((∃x, b x → F) → F) → F) :=
assume hab hnenb,
classical.by_cases
(assume h : ∃x, ¬b x, begin cases h with x, apply hnenb, existsi x, intros, contradiction end)
(assume h : ¬∃x, ¬b x, hab (take x,
classical.by_cases
(assume bx : b x, bx)
(assume nbx : ¬b x, begin assert hf : false, apply h, existsi x, assumption, contradiction end)))
meta def inf_all_l (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) :=
on_first_left_dn c $ λhnallb,
match hnallb.local_type with
| pi _ _ (pi n bi a b) _ := do
enb ← mk_mapp ``Exists [none, some $ lam n binder_info.default a (imp b c.local_false)],
hnenb ← mk_local_def `h (imp enb c.local_false),
pr ← mk_app ``super.demorgan' [hnallb, hnenb],
return [([hnenb], pr)]
| _ := failed
end
meta def inf_ex_r (c : clause) : tactic (list clause) := do
(qf, ctx) ← c.open_constn c.num_quants,
skolemized ← on_first_right' qf $ λhexp,
match hexp.local_type with
| (app (app (const ``Exists [_]) d) p) := do
sk_sym_name_pp ← get_unused_name `sk (some 1),
inh_lc ← mk_local' `w binder_info.implicit d,
sk_sym ← mk_local_def sk_sym_name_pp (pis (ctx ++ [inh_lc]) d),
sk_p ← whnf_no_delta $ app p (app_of_list sk_sym (ctx ++ [inh_lc])),
sk_ax ← mk_mapp ``Exists [some (local_type sk_sym),
some (lambdas [sk_sym] (pis (ctx ++ [inh_lc]) (imp hexp.local_type sk_p)))],
sk_ax_name ← get_unused_name `sk_axiom (some 1), assert sk_ax_name sk_ax,
nonempt_of_inh ← mk_mapp ``nonempty.intro [some d, some inh_lc],
eps ← mk_mapp ``classical.epsilon [some d, some nonempt_of_inh, some p],
existsi (lambdas (ctx ++ [inh_lc]) eps),
eps_spec ← mk_mapp ``classical.epsilon_spec [some d, some p],
exact (lambdas (ctx ++ [inh_lc]) eps_spec),
sk_ax_local ← get_local sk_ax_name, cases sk_ax_local [sk_sym_name_pp, sk_ax_name],
sk_ax' ← get_local sk_ax_name,
return [([inh_lc], app_of_list sk_ax' (ctx ++ [inh_lc, hexp]))]
| _ := failed
end,
return $ skolemized.map (λs, s.close_constn ctx)
meta def first_some {a : Type} : list (tactic (option a)) → tactic (option a)
| [] := return none
| (x::xs) := do xres ← x, match xres with some y := return (some y) | none := first_some xs end
private meta def get_clauses_core' (rules : list (clause → tactic (list clause)))
: list clause → tactic (list clause) | cs :=
lift list.join $ do
for cs $ λc, do first $
rules.map (λr, r c >>= get_clauses_core') ++ [return [c]]
meta def get_clauses_core (rules : list (clause → tactic (list clause))) (initial : list clause)
: tactic (list clause) := do
clauses ← get_clauses_core' rules initial,
filter (λc, lift bnot $ is_taut c) $ list.nub_on clause.type clauses
meta def clausification_rules_intuit : list (clause → tactic (list clause)) :=
[ inf_false_l, inf_false_r, inf_true_l, inf_true_r,
inf_not_l, inf_not_r,
inf_and_l, inf_and_r,
inf_iff_l, inf_iff_r,
inf_or_l, inf_or_r,
inf_ex_l,
inf_normalize_l, inf_normalize_r ]
meta def clausification_rules_classical : list (clause → tactic (list clause)) :=
[ inf_false_l, inf_false_r, inf_true_l, inf_true_r,
inf_not_l, inf_not_r,
inf_and_l, inf_and_r,
inf_iff_l, inf_iff_r,
inf_or_l, inf_or_r,
inf_imp_l, inf_all_r,
inf_ex_l,
inf_all_l, inf_ex_r,
inf_normalize_l, inf_normalize_r ]
meta def get_clauses_classical : list clause → tactic (list clause) :=
get_clauses_core clausification_rules_classical
meta def get_clauses_intuit : list clause → tactic (list clause) :=
get_clauses_core clausification_rules_intuit
meta def as_refutation : tactic unit := do
repeat (do intro1, skip),
tgt ← target,
if tgt.is_constant || tgt.is_local_constant then skip else do
local_false_name ← get_unused_name `F none, tgt_type ← infer_type tgt,
definev local_false_name tgt_type tgt, local_false ← get_local local_false_name,
target_name ← get_unused_name `target none,
assertv target_name (imp tgt local_false) (lam `hf binder_info.default tgt $ mk_var 0),
change local_false
meta def clauses_of_context : tactic (list clause) := do
local_false ← target,
l ← local_context,
monad.for l (clause.of_proof local_false)
meta def clausify_pre := preprocessing_rule $ take new, lift list.join $ for new $ λ dc, do
cs ← get_clauses_classical [dc.c],
if cs.length ≤ 1 then
return (for cs $ λ c, { dc with c := c })
else
for cs (λc, mk_derived c dc.sc)
-- @[super.inf]
meta def clausification_inf : inf_decl := inf_decl.mk 0 $
λ given, list.foldr (<|>) (return ()) $
do r ← clausification_rules_classical,
[do cs ← r given.c,
cs' ← get_clauses_classical cs,
for' cs' (λc, mk_derived c given.sc.sched_now >>= add_inferred),
remove_redundant given.id []]
end super
|
a26d7b5096a3b14c79a105a6625d1567e5288d6f | 947fa6c38e48771ae886239b4edce6db6e18d0fb | /src/data/matrix/basic.lean | 56995376e726ef7c6b5b4f0acf3f341343f98983 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ramonfmir/mathlib | c5dc8b33155473fab97c38bd3aa6723dc289beaa | 14c52e990c17f5a00c0cc9e09847af16fabbed25 | refs/heads/master | 1,661,979,343,526 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 182,072,989 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,585,876,000 | 1,555,585,876,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 79,406 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import algebra.algebra.basic
import algebra.big_operators.pi
import algebra.big_operators.ring
import algebra.module.linear_map
import algebra.module.pi
import algebra.ring.equiv
import algebra.star.module
import algebra.star.pi
import data.fintype.card
/-!
# Matrices
This file defines basic properties of matrices.
Matrices with rows indexed by `m`, columns indexed by `n`, and entries of type `α` are represented
with `matrix m n α`. For the typical approach of counting rows and columns,
`matrix (fin m) (fin n) α` can be used.
## Notation
The locale `matrix` gives the following notation:
* `⬝ᵥ` for `matrix.dot_product`
* `⬝` for `matrix.mul`
* `ᵀ` for `matrix.transpose`
* `ᴴ` for `matrix.conj_transpose`
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `λ i j, _` or even `(λ i j, _ : matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by lean as having
the right type. Instead, `matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
universes u u' v w
open_locale big_operators
/-- `matrix m n R` is the type of matrices with entries in `R`, whose rows are indexed by `m`
and whose columns are indexed by `n`. -/
def matrix (m : Type u) (n : Type u') (α : Type v) : Type (max u u' v) :=
m → n → α
variables {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variables {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace matrix
section ext
variables {M N : matrix m n α}
theorem ext_iff : (∀ i j, M i j = N i j) ↔ M = N :=
⟨λ h, funext $ λ i, funext $ h i, λ h, by simp [h]⟩
@[ext] theorem ext : (∀ i j, M i j = N i j) → M = N :=
ext_iff.mp
end ext
/-- Cast a function into a matrix.
The two sides of the equivalence are definitionally equal types. We want to use an explicit cast
to distinguish the types because `matrix` has different instances to pi types (such as `pi.has_mul`,
which performs elementwise multiplication, vs `matrix.has_mul`).
If you are defining a matrix, in terms of its entries, either use `of (λ i j, _)`, or use pattern
matching in a definition as `| i j := _` (which can only be unfolded when fully-applied). The
purpose of this approach is to ensure that terms of the form `(λ i j, _) * (λ i j, _)` do not
appear, as the type of `*` can be misleading.
-/
def of : (m → n → α) ≃ matrix m n α := equiv.refl _
@[simp] lemma of_apply (f : m → n → α) (i j) : of f i j = f i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_symm_apply (f : matrix m n α) (i j) : of.symm f i j = f i j := rfl
/-- `M.map f` is the matrix obtained by applying `f` to each entry of the matrix `M`.
This is available in bundled forms as:
* `add_monoid_hom.map_matrix`
* `linear_map.map_matrix`
* `ring_hom.map_matrix`
* `alg_hom.map_matrix`
* `equiv.map_matrix`
* `add_equiv.map_matrix`
* `linear_equiv.map_matrix`
* `ring_equiv.map_matrix`
* `alg_equiv.map_matrix`
-/
def map (M : matrix m n α) (f : α → β) : matrix m n β := of (λ i j, f (M i j))
@[simp]
lemma map_apply {M : matrix m n α} {f : α → β} {i : m} {j : n} :
M.map f i j = f (M i j) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_id (M : matrix m n α) : M.map id = M :=
by { ext, refl, }
@[simp]
lemma map_map {M : matrix m n α} {β γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
(M.map f).map g = M.map (g ∘ f) :=
by { ext, refl, }
lemma map_injective {f : α → β} (hf : function.injective f) :
function.injective (λ M : matrix m n α, M.map f) :=
λ M N h, ext $ λ i j, hf $ ext_iff.mpr h i j
/-- The transpose of a matrix. -/
def transpose (M : matrix m n α) : matrix n m α
| x y := M y x
localized "postfix `ᵀ`:1500 := matrix.transpose" in matrix
/-- The conjugate transpose of a matrix defined in term of `star`. -/
def conj_transpose [has_star α] (M : matrix m n α) : matrix n m α :=
M.transpose.map star
localized "postfix `ᴴ`:1500 := matrix.conj_transpose" in matrix
/-- `matrix.col u` is the column matrix whose entries are given by `u`. -/
def col (w : m → α) : matrix m unit α
| x y := w x
/-- `matrix.row u` is the row matrix whose entries are given by `u`. -/
def row (v : n → α) : matrix unit n α
| x y := v y
instance [inhabited α] : inhabited (matrix m n α) := pi.inhabited _
instance [has_add α] : has_add (matrix m n α) := pi.has_add
instance [add_semigroup α] : add_semigroup (matrix m n α) := pi.add_semigroup
instance [add_comm_semigroup α] : add_comm_semigroup (matrix m n α) := pi.add_comm_semigroup
instance [has_zero α] : has_zero (matrix m n α) := pi.has_zero
instance [add_zero_class α] : add_zero_class (matrix m n α) := pi.add_zero_class
instance [add_monoid α] : add_monoid (matrix m n α) := pi.add_monoid
instance [add_comm_monoid α] : add_comm_monoid (matrix m n α) := pi.add_comm_monoid
instance [has_neg α] : has_neg (matrix m n α) := pi.has_neg
instance [has_sub α] : has_sub (matrix m n α) := pi.has_sub
instance [add_group α] : add_group (matrix m n α) := pi.add_group
instance [add_comm_group α] : add_comm_group (matrix m n α) := pi.add_comm_group
instance [unique α] : unique (matrix m n α) := pi.unique
instance [subsingleton α] : subsingleton (matrix m n α) := pi.subsingleton
instance [nonempty m] [nonempty n] [nontrivial α] : nontrivial (matrix m n α) :=
function.nontrivial
instance [has_smul R α] : has_smul R (matrix m n α) := pi.has_smul
instance [has_smul R α] [has_smul S α] [smul_comm_class R S α] :
smul_comm_class R S (matrix m n α) := pi.smul_comm_class
instance [has_smul R S] [has_smul R α] [has_smul S α] [is_scalar_tower R S α] :
is_scalar_tower R S (matrix m n α) := pi.is_scalar_tower
instance [has_smul R α] [has_smul Rᵐᵒᵖ α] [is_central_scalar R α] :
is_central_scalar R (matrix m n α) := pi.is_central_scalar
instance [monoid R] [mul_action R α] :
mul_action R (matrix m n α) := pi.mul_action _
instance [monoid R] [add_monoid α] [distrib_mul_action R α] :
distrib_mul_action R (matrix m n α) := pi.distrib_mul_action _
instance [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid α] [module R α] :
module R (matrix m n α) := pi.module _ _ _
/-! simp-normal form pulls `of` to the outside. -/
@[simp] lemma of_zero [has_zero α] : of (0 : m → n → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_add_of [has_add α] (f g : m → n → α) : of f + of g = of (f + g) := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_sub_of [has_sub α] (f g : m → n → α) : of f - of g = of (f - g) := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_of [has_neg α] (f : m → n → α) : -of f = of (-f) := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_of [has_smul R α] (r : R) (f : m → n → α) : r • of f = of (r • f) := rfl
@[simp] protected lemma map_zero [has_zero α] [has_zero β] (f : α → β) (h : f 0 = 0) :
(0 : matrix m n α).map f = 0 :=
by { ext, simp [h], }
protected lemma map_add [has_add α] [has_add β] (f : α → β)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f (a₁ + a₂) = f a₁ + f a₂)
(M N : matrix m n α) : (M + N).map f = M.map f + N.map f :=
ext $ λ _ _, hf _ _
protected lemma map_sub [has_sub α] [has_sub β] (f : α → β)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f (a₁ - a₂) = f a₁ - f a₂)
(M N : matrix m n α) : (M - N).map f = M.map f - N.map f :=
ext $ λ _ _, hf _ _
lemma map_smul [has_smul R α] [has_smul R β] (f : α → β) (r : R)
(hf : ∀ a, f (r • a) = r • f a) (M : matrix m n α) : (r • M).map f = r • (M.map f) :=
ext $ λ _ _, hf _
/-- The scalar action via `has_mul.to_has_smul` is transformed by the same map as the elements
of the matrix, when `f` preserves multiplication. -/
lemma map_smul' [has_mul α] [has_mul β] (f : α → β) (r : α) (A : matrix n n α)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f (a₁ * a₂) = f a₁ * f a₂) :
(r • A).map f = f r • A.map f :=
ext $ λ _ _, hf _ _
/-- The scalar action via `has_mul.to_has_opposite_smul` is transformed by the same map as the
elements of the matrix, when `f` preserves multiplication. -/
lemma map_op_smul' [has_mul α] [has_mul β] (f : α → β) (r : α) (A : matrix n n α)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f (a₁ * a₂) = f a₁ * f a₂) :
(mul_opposite.op r • A).map f = mul_opposite.op (f r) • A.map f :=
ext $ λ _ _, hf _ _
lemma _root_.is_smul_regular.matrix [has_smul R S] {k : R} (hk : is_smul_regular S k) :
is_smul_regular (matrix m n S) k :=
is_smul_regular.pi $ λ _, is_smul_regular.pi $ λ _, hk
lemma _root_.is_left_regular.matrix [has_mul α] {k : α} (hk : is_left_regular k) :
is_smul_regular (matrix m n α) k :=
hk.is_smul_regular.matrix
instance subsingleton_of_empty_left [is_empty m] : subsingleton (matrix m n α) :=
⟨λ M N, by { ext, exact is_empty_elim i }⟩
instance subsingleton_of_empty_right [is_empty n] : subsingleton (matrix m n α) :=
⟨λ M N, by { ext, exact is_empty_elim j }⟩
end matrix
open_locale matrix
namespace matrix
section diagonal
variables [decidable_eq n]
/-- `diagonal d` is the square matrix such that `(diagonal d) i i = d i` and `(diagonal d) i j = 0`
if `i ≠ j`.
Note that bundled versions exist as:
* `matrix.diagonal_add_monoid_hom`
* `matrix.diagonal_linear_map`
* `matrix.diagonal_ring_hom`
* `matrix.diagonal_alg_hom`
-/
def diagonal [has_zero α] (d : n → α) : matrix n n α
| i j := if i = j then d i else 0
@[simp] theorem diagonal_apply_eq [has_zero α] (d : n → α) (i : n) : (diagonal d) i i = d i :=
by simp [diagonal]
@[simp] theorem diagonal_apply_ne [has_zero α] (d : n → α) {i j : n} (h : i ≠ j) :
(diagonal d) i j = 0 := by simp [diagonal, h]
theorem diagonal_apply_ne' [has_zero α] (d : n → α) {i j : n} (h : j ≠ i) :
(diagonal d) i j = 0 := diagonal_apply_ne d h.symm
@[simp] theorem diagonal_eq_diagonal_iff [has_zero α] {d₁ d₂ : n → α} :
diagonal d₁ = diagonal d₂ ↔ ∀ i, d₁ i = d₂ i :=
⟨λ h i, by simpa using congr_arg (λ m : matrix n n α, m i i) h,
λ h, by rw show d₁ = d₂, from funext h⟩
lemma diagonal_injective [has_zero α] : function.injective (diagonal : (n → α) → matrix n n α) :=
λ d₁ d₂ h, funext $ λ i, by simpa using matrix.ext_iff.mpr h i i
@[simp] theorem diagonal_zero [has_zero α] : (diagonal (λ _, 0) : matrix n n α) = 0 :=
by { ext, simp [diagonal] }
@[simp] lemma diagonal_transpose [has_zero α] (v : n → α) :
(diagonal v)ᵀ = diagonal v :=
begin
ext i j,
by_cases h : i = j,
{ simp [h, transpose] },
{ simp [h, transpose, diagonal_apply_ne' _ h] }
end
@[simp] theorem diagonal_add [add_zero_class α] (d₁ d₂ : n → α) :
diagonal d₁ + diagonal d₂ = diagonal (λ i, d₁ i + d₂ i) :=
by ext i j; by_cases h : i = j; simp [h]
@[simp] theorem diagonal_smul [monoid R] [add_monoid α] [distrib_mul_action R α] (r : R)
(d : n → α) :
diagonal (r • d) = r • diagonal d :=
by ext i j; by_cases h : i = j; simp [h]
variables (n α)
/-- `matrix.diagonal` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonal_add_monoid_hom [add_zero_class α] : (n → α) →+ matrix n n α :=
{ to_fun := diagonal,
map_zero' := diagonal_zero,
map_add' := λ x y, (diagonal_add x y).symm,}
variables (R)
/-- `matrix.diagonal` as a `linear_map`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonal_linear_map [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid α] [module R α] :
(n → α) →ₗ[R] matrix n n α :=
{ map_smul' := diagonal_smul,
.. diagonal_add_monoid_hom n α,}
variables {n α R}
@[simp] lemma diagonal_map [has_zero α] [has_zero β] {f : α → β} (h : f 0 = 0) {d : n → α} :
(diagonal d).map f = diagonal (λ m, f (d m)) :=
by { ext, simp only [diagonal, map_apply], split_ifs; simp [h], }
@[simp] lemma diagonal_conj_transpose [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] (v : n → α) :
(diagonal v)ᴴ = diagonal (star v) :=
begin
rw [conj_transpose, diagonal_transpose, diagonal_map (star_zero _)],
refl,
end
section one
variables [has_zero α] [has_one α]
instance : has_one (matrix n n α) := ⟨diagonal (λ _, 1)⟩
@[simp] theorem diagonal_one : (diagonal (λ _, 1) : matrix n n α) = 1 := rfl
theorem one_apply {i j} : (1 : matrix n n α) i j = if i = j then 1 else 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_apply_eq (i) : (1 : matrix n n α) i i = 1 := diagonal_apply_eq _ i
@[simp] theorem one_apply_ne {i j} : i ≠ j → (1 : matrix n n α) i j = 0 :=
diagonal_apply_ne _
theorem one_apply_ne' {i j} : j ≠ i → (1 : matrix n n α) i j = 0 :=
diagonal_apply_ne' _
@[simp] lemma map_one [has_zero β] [has_one β]
(f : α → β) (h₀ : f 0 = 0) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) :
(1 : matrix n n α).map f = (1 : matrix n n β) :=
by { ext, simp only [one_apply, map_apply], split_ifs; simp [h₀, h₁], }
lemma one_eq_pi_single {i j} : (1 : matrix n n α) i j = pi.single i 1 j :=
by simp only [one_apply, pi.single_apply, eq_comm]; congr -- deal with decidable_eq
end one
section numeral
@[simp] lemma bit0_apply [has_add α] (M : matrix m m α) (i : m) (j : m) :
(bit0 M) i j = bit0 (M i j) := rfl
variables [add_zero_class α] [has_one α]
lemma bit1_apply (M : matrix n n α) (i : n) (j : n) :
(bit1 M) i j = if i = j then bit1 (M i j) else bit0 (M i j) :=
by dsimp [bit1]; by_cases h : i = j; simp [h]
@[simp]
lemma bit1_apply_eq (M : matrix n n α) (i : n) :
(bit1 M) i i = bit1 (M i i) :=
by simp [bit1_apply]
@[simp]
lemma bit1_apply_ne (M : matrix n n α) {i j : n} (h : i ≠ j) :
(bit1 M) i j = bit0 (M i j) :=
by simp [bit1_apply, h]
end numeral
end diagonal
section diag
/-- The diagonal of a square matrix. -/
@[simp] def diag (A : matrix n n α) (i : n) : α := A i i
@[simp] lemma diag_diagonal [decidable_eq n] [has_zero α] (a : n → α) : diag (diagonal a) = a :=
funext $ @diagonal_apply_eq _ _ _ _ a
@[simp] lemma diag_transpose (A : matrix n n α) : diag Aᵀ = diag A := rfl
@[simp] theorem diag_zero [has_zero α] : diag (0 : matrix n n α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem diag_add [has_add α] (A B : matrix n n α) : diag (A + B) = diag A + diag B := rfl
@[simp] theorem diag_sub [has_sub α] (A B : matrix n n α) : diag (A - B) = diag A - diag B := rfl
@[simp] theorem diag_neg [has_neg α] (A : matrix n n α) : diag (-A) = -diag A := rfl
@[simp] theorem diag_smul [has_smul R α] (r : R) (A : matrix n n α) : diag (r • A) = r • diag A :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem diag_one [decidable_eq n] [has_zero α] [has_one α] : diag (1 : matrix n n α) = 1 :=
diag_diagonal _
variables (n α)
/-- `matrix.diag` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def diag_add_monoid_hom [add_zero_class α] : matrix n n α →+ (n → α) :=
{ to_fun := diag,
map_zero' := diag_zero,
map_add' := diag_add,}
variables (R)
/-- `matrix.diag` as a `linear_map`. -/
@[simps]
def diag_linear_map [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid α] [module R α] : matrix n n α →ₗ[R] (n → α) :=
{ map_smul' := diag_smul,
.. diag_add_monoid_hom n α,}
variables {n α R}
lemma diag_map {f : α → β} {A : matrix n n α} : diag (A.map f) = f ∘ diag A := rfl
@[simp] lemma diag_conj_transpose [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] (A : matrix n n α) :
diag Aᴴ = star (diag A) := rfl
@[simp] lemma diag_list_sum [add_monoid α] (l : list (matrix n n α)) :
diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diag_add_monoid_hom n α) l
@[simp] lemma diag_multiset_sum [add_comm_monoid α] (s : multiset (matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diag_add_monoid_hom n α) s
@[simp] lemma diag_sum {ι} [add_comm_monoid α] (s : finset ι) (f : ι → matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i in s, f i) = ∑ i in s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diag_add_monoid_hom n α) f s
end diag
section dot_product
variables [fintype m] [fintype n]
/-- `dot_product v w` is the sum of the entrywise products `v i * w i` -/
def dot_product [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α] (v w : m → α) : α :=
∑ i, v i * w i
/- The precedence of 72 comes immediately after ` • ` for `has_smul.smul`,
so that `r₁ • a ⬝ᵥ r₂ • b` is parsed as `(r₁ • a) ⬝ᵥ (r₂ • b)` here. -/
localized "infix ` ⬝ᵥ `:72 := matrix.dot_product" in matrix
lemma dot_product_assoc [non_unital_semiring α] (u : m → α) (w : n → α)
(v : matrix m n α) :
(λ j, u ⬝ᵥ (λ i, v i j)) ⬝ᵥ w = u ⬝ᵥ (λ i, (v i) ⬝ᵥ w) :=
by simpa [dot_product, finset.mul_sum, finset.sum_mul, mul_assoc] using finset.sum_comm
lemma dot_product_comm [add_comm_monoid α] [comm_semigroup α] (v w : m → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ w = w ⬝ᵥ v :=
by simp_rw [dot_product, mul_comm]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_punit [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α] (v w : punit → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ w = v ⟨⟩ * w ⟨⟩ :=
by simp [dot_product]
section non_unital_non_assoc_semiring
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] (u v w : m → α) (x y : n → α)
@[simp] lemma dot_product_zero : v ⬝ᵥ 0 = 0 := by simp [dot_product]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_zero' : v ⬝ᵥ (λ _, 0) = 0 := dot_product_zero v
@[simp] lemma zero_dot_product : 0 ⬝ᵥ v = 0 := by simp [dot_product]
@[simp] lemma zero_dot_product' : (λ _, (0 : α)) ⬝ᵥ v = 0 := zero_dot_product v
@[simp] lemma add_dot_product : (u + v) ⬝ᵥ w = u ⬝ᵥ w + v ⬝ᵥ w :=
by simp [dot_product, add_mul, finset.sum_add_distrib]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_add : u ⬝ᵥ (v + w) = u ⬝ᵥ v + u ⬝ᵥ w :=
by simp [dot_product, mul_add, finset.sum_add_distrib]
@[simp] lemma sum_elim_dot_product_sum_elim :
(sum.elim u x) ⬝ᵥ (sum.elim v y) = u ⬝ᵥ v + x ⬝ᵥ y :=
by simp [dot_product]
end non_unital_non_assoc_semiring
section non_unital_non_assoc_semiring_decidable
variables [decidable_eq m] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] (u v w : m → α)
@[simp] lemma diagonal_dot_product (i : m) : diagonal v i ⬝ᵥ w = v i * w i :=
have ∀ j ≠ i, diagonal v i j * w j = 0 := λ j hij, by simp [diagonal_apply_ne' _ hij],
by convert finset.sum_eq_single i (λ j _, this j) _ using 1; simp
@[simp] lemma dot_product_diagonal (i : m) : v ⬝ᵥ diagonal w i = v i * w i :=
have ∀ j ≠ i, v j * diagonal w i j = 0 := λ j hij, by simp [diagonal_apply_ne' _ hij],
by convert finset.sum_eq_single i (λ j _, this j) _ using 1; simp
@[simp] lemma dot_product_diagonal' (i : m) : v ⬝ᵥ (λ j, diagonal w j i) = v i * w i :=
have ∀ j ≠ i, v j * diagonal w j i = 0 := λ j hij, by simp [diagonal_apply_ne _ hij],
by convert finset.sum_eq_single i (λ j _, this j) _ using 1; simp
@[simp] lemma single_dot_product (x : α) (i : m) : pi.single i x ⬝ᵥ v = x * v i :=
have ∀ j ≠ i, pi.single i x j * v j = 0 := λ j hij, by simp [pi.single_eq_of_ne hij],
by convert finset.sum_eq_single i (λ j _, this j) _ using 1; simp
@[simp] lemma dot_product_single (x : α) (i : m) : v ⬝ᵥ pi.single i x = v i * x :=
have ∀ j ≠ i, v j * pi.single i x j = 0 := λ j hij, by simp [pi.single_eq_of_ne hij],
by convert finset.sum_eq_single i (λ j _, this j) _ using 1; simp
end non_unital_non_assoc_semiring_decidable
section non_unital_non_assoc_ring
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] (u v w : m → α)
@[simp] lemma neg_dot_product : -v ⬝ᵥ w = - (v ⬝ᵥ w) := by simp [dot_product]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_neg : v ⬝ᵥ -w = - (v ⬝ᵥ w) := by simp [dot_product]
@[simp] lemma sub_dot_product : (u - v) ⬝ᵥ w = u ⬝ᵥ w - v ⬝ᵥ w :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_sub : u ⬝ᵥ (v - w) = u ⬝ᵥ v - u ⬝ᵥ w :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
end non_unital_non_assoc_ring
section distrib_mul_action
variables [monoid R] [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α] [distrib_mul_action R α]
@[simp] lemma smul_dot_product [is_scalar_tower R α α] (x : R) (v w : m → α) :
(x • v) ⬝ᵥ w = x • (v ⬝ᵥ w) :=
by simp [dot_product, finset.smul_sum, smul_mul_assoc]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_smul [smul_comm_class R α α] (x : R) (v w : m → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ (x • w) = x • (v ⬝ᵥ w) :=
by simp [dot_product, finset.smul_sum, mul_smul_comm]
end distrib_mul_action
section star_ring
variables [non_unital_semiring α] [star_ring α] (v w : m → α)
lemma star_dot_product_star : star v ⬝ᵥ star w = star (w ⬝ᵥ v) :=
by simp [dot_product]
lemma star_dot_product : star v ⬝ᵥ w = star (star w ⬝ᵥ v) :=
by simp [dot_product]
lemma dot_product_star : v ⬝ᵥ star w = star (w ⬝ᵥ star v) :=
by simp [dot_product]
end star_ring
end dot_product
open_locale matrix
/-- `M ⬝ N` is the usual product of matrices `M` and `N`, i.e. we have that
`(M ⬝ N) i k` is the dot product of the `i`-th row of `M` by the `k`-th column of `N`.
This is currently only defined when `m` is finite. -/
protected def mul [fintype m] [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α]
(M : matrix l m α) (N : matrix m n α) : matrix l n α :=
λ i k, (λ j, M i j) ⬝ᵥ (λ j, N j k)
localized "infixl ` ⬝ `:75 := matrix.mul" in matrix
theorem mul_apply [fintype m] [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α]
{M : matrix l m α} {N : matrix m n α} {i k} : (M ⬝ N) i k = ∑ j, M i j * N j k := rfl
instance [fintype n] [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α] : has_mul (matrix n n α) := ⟨matrix.mul⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul [fintype n] [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α] (M N : matrix n n α) :
M * N = M ⬝ N := rfl
theorem mul_apply' [fintype m] [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α]
{M : matrix l m α} {N : matrix m n α} {i k} : (M ⬝ N) i k = (λ j, M i j) ⬝ᵥ (λ j, N j k)
:= rfl
@[simp] theorem diagonal_neg [decidable_eq n] [add_group α] (d : n → α) :
-diagonal d = diagonal (λ i, -d i) :=
((diagonal_add_monoid_hom n α).map_neg d).symm
lemma sum_apply [add_comm_monoid α] (i : m) (j : n)
(s : finset β) (g : β → matrix m n α) :
(∑ c in s, g c) i j = ∑ c in s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
section add_comm_monoid
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α]
@[simp] lemma smul_mul [fintype n] [monoid R] [distrib_mul_action R α] [is_scalar_tower R α α]
(a : R) (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n l α) :
(a • M) ⬝ N = a • M ⬝ N :=
by { ext, apply smul_dot_product }
@[simp] lemma mul_smul [fintype n] [monoid R] [distrib_mul_action R α] [smul_comm_class R α α]
(M : matrix m n α) (a : R) (N : matrix n l α) : M ⬝ (a • N) = a • M ⬝ N :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_smul }
end add_comm_monoid
section non_unital_non_assoc_semiring
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α]
@[simp] protected theorem mul_zero [fintype n] (M : matrix m n α) : M ⬝ (0 : matrix n o α) = 0 :=
by { ext i j, apply dot_product_zero }
@[simp] protected theorem zero_mul [fintype m] (M : matrix m n α) : (0 : matrix l m α) ⬝ M = 0 :=
by { ext i j, apply zero_dot_product }
protected theorem mul_add [fintype n] (L : matrix m n α) (M N : matrix n o α) :
L ⬝ (M + N) = L ⬝ M + L ⬝ N := by { ext i j, apply dot_product_add }
protected theorem add_mul [fintype m] (L M : matrix l m α) (N : matrix m n α) :
(L + M) ⬝ N = L ⬝ N + M ⬝ N := by { ext i j, apply add_dot_product }
instance [fintype n] : non_unital_non_assoc_semiring (matrix n n α) :=
{ mul := (*),
add := (+),
zero := 0,
mul_zero := matrix.mul_zero,
zero_mul := matrix.zero_mul,
left_distrib := matrix.mul_add,
right_distrib := matrix.add_mul,
.. matrix.add_comm_monoid}
@[simp] theorem diagonal_mul [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
(d : m → α) (M : matrix m n α) (i j) : (diagonal d).mul M i j = d i * M i j :=
diagonal_dot_product _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mul_diagonal [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
(d : n → α) (M : matrix m n α) (i j) : (M ⬝ diagonal d) i j = M i j * d j :=
by { rw ← diagonal_transpose, apply dot_product_diagonal }
@[simp] theorem diagonal_mul_diagonal [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] (d₁ d₂ : n → α) :
(diagonal d₁) ⬝ (diagonal d₂) = diagonal (λ i, d₁ i * d₂ i) :=
by ext i j; by_cases i = j; simp [h]
theorem diagonal_mul_diagonal' [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] (d₁ d₂ : n → α) :
diagonal d₁ * diagonal d₂ = diagonal (λ i, d₁ i * d₂ i) :=
diagonal_mul_diagonal _ _
lemma smul_eq_diagonal_mul [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (M : matrix m n α) (a : α) :
a • M = diagonal (λ _, a) ⬝ M :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma diag_col_mul_row (a b : n → α) : diag (col a ⬝ row b) = a * b :=
by { ext, simp [matrix.mul_apply, col, row] }
/-- Left multiplication by a matrix, as an `add_monoid_hom` from matrices to matrices. -/
@[simps] def add_monoid_hom_mul_left [fintype m] (M : matrix l m α) :
matrix m n α →+ matrix l n α :=
{ to_fun := λ x, M ⬝ x,
map_zero' := matrix.mul_zero _,
map_add' := matrix.mul_add _ }
/-- Right multiplication by a matrix, as an `add_monoid_hom` from matrices to matrices. -/
@[simps] def add_monoid_hom_mul_right [fintype m] (M : matrix m n α) :
matrix l m α →+ matrix l n α :=
{ to_fun := λ x, x ⬝ M,
map_zero' := matrix.zero_mul _,
map_add' := λ _ _, matrix.add_mul _ _ _ }
protected lemma sum_mul [fintype m] (s : finset β) (f : β → matrix l m α)
(M : matrix m n α) : (∑ a in s, f a) ⬝ M = ∑ a in s, f a ⬝ M :=
(add_monoid_hom_mul_right M : matrix l m α →+ _).map_sum f s
protected lemma mul_sum [fintype m] (s : finset β) (f : β → matrix m n α)
(M : matrix l m α) : M ⬝ ∑ a in s, f a = ∑ a in s, M ⬝ f a :=
(add_monoid_hom_mul_left M : matrix m n α →+ _).map_sum f s
/-- This instance enables use with `smul_mul_assoc`. -/
instance semiring.is_scalar_tower [fintype n] [monoid R] [distrib_mul_action R α]
[is_scalar_tower R α α] : is_scalar_tower R (matrix n n α) (matrix n n α) :=
⟨λ r m n, matrix.smul_mul r m n⟩
/-- This instance enables use with `mul_smul_comm`. -/
instance semiring.smul_comm_class [fintype n] [monoid R] [distrib_mul_action R α]
[smul_comm_class R α α] : smul_comm_class R (matrix n n α) (matrix n n α) :=
⟨λ r m n, (matrix.mul_smul m r n).symm⟩
end non_unital_non_assoc_semiring
section non_assoc_semiring
variables [non_assoc_semiring α]
@[simp] protected theorem one_mul [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (M : matrix m n α) :
(1 : matrix m m α) ⬝ M = M :=
by ext i j; rw [← diagonal_one, diagonal_mul, one_mul]
@[simp] protected theorem mul_one [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] (M : matrix m n α) :
M ⬝ (1 : matrix n n α) = M :=
by ext i j; rw [← diagonal_one, mul_diagonal, mul_one]
instance [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] : non_assoc_semiring (matrix n n α) :=
{ one := 1,
one_mul := matrix.one_mul,
mul_one := matrix.mul_one,
nat_cast := λ n, diagonal (λ _, n),
nat_cast_zero := by ext; simp [nat.cast],
nat_cast_succ := λ n, by ext; by_cases i = j; simp [nat.cast, *],
.. matrix.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring }
@[simp]
lemma map_mul [fintype n] {L : matrix m n α} {M : matrix n o α} [non_assoc_semiring β]
{f : α →+* β} : (L ⬝ M).map f = L.map f ⬝ M.map f :=
by { ext, simp [mul_apply, ring_hom.map_sum], }
variables (α n)
/-- `matrix.diagonal` as a `ring_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonal_ring_hom [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] : (n → α) →+* matrix n n α :=
{ to_fun := diagonal,
map_one' := diagonal_one,
map_mul' := λ _ _, (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm,
.. diagonal_add_monoid_hom n α }
end non_assoc_semiring
section non_unital_semiring
variables [non_unital_semiring α] [fintype m] [fintype n]
protected theorem mul_assoc (L : matrix l m α) (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) :
(L ⬝ M) ⬝ N = L ⬝ (M ⬝ N) :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_assoc }
instance : non_unital_semiring (matrix n n α) :=
{ mul_assoc := matrix.mul_assoc, ..matrix.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring }
end non_unital_semiring
section semiring
variables [semiring α]
instance [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] : semiring (matrix n n α) :=
{ ..matrix.non_unital_semiring, ..matrix.non_assoc_semiring }
end semiring
section non_unital_non_assoc_ring
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] [fintype n]
@[simp] protected theorem neg_mul (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) :
(-M) ⬝ N = -(M ⬝ N) :=
by { ext, apply neg_dot_product }
@[simp] protected theorem mul_neg (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) :
M ⬝ (-N) = -(M ⬝ N) :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_neg }
protected theorem sub_mul (M M' : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) :
(M - M') ⬝ N = M ⬝ N - M' ⬝ N :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, matrix.add_mul, matrix.neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
protected theorem mul_sub (M : matrix m n α) (N N' : matrix n o α) :
M ⬝ (N - N') = M ⬝ N - M ⬝ N' :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, matrix.mul_add, matrix.mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
instance : non_unital_non_assoc_ring (matrix n n α) :=
{ ..matrix.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring, ..matrix.add_comm_group }
end non_unital_non_assoc_ring
instance [fintype n] [non_unital_ring α] : non_unital_ring (matrix n n α) :=
{ ..matrix.non_unital_semiring, ..matrix.add_comm_group }
instance [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] [non_assoc_ring α] : non_assoc_ring (matrix n n α) :=
{ ..matrix.non_assoc_semiring, ..matrix.add_comm_group }
instance [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] [ring α] : ring (matrix n n α) :=
{ ..matrix.semiring, ..matrix.add_comm_group }
section semiring
variables [semiring α]
lemma diagonal_pow [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonal_ring_hom n α) v k).symm
@[simp] lemma mul_mul_left [fintype n] (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) (a : α) :
of (λ i j, a * M i j) ⬝ N = a • (M ⬝ N) :=
smul_mul a M N
/--
The ring homomorphism `α →+* matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [decidable_eq n] [fintype n] : α →+* matrix n n α :=
{ to_fun := λ a, a • 1,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by { intros, ext, simp [mul_assoc], },
.. (smul_add_hom α _).flip (1 : matrix n n α) }
section scalar
variables [decidable_eq n] [fintype n]
@[simp] lemma coe_scalar : (scalar n : α → matrix n n α) = λ a, a • 1 := rfl
lemma scalar_apply_eq (a : α) (i : n) :
scalar n a i i = a :=
by simp only [coe_scalar, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, one_apply_eq, pi.smul_apply]
lemma scalar_apply_ne (a : α) (i j : n) (h : i ≠ j) :
scalar n a i j = 0 :=
by simp only [h, coe_scalar, one_apply_ne, ne.def, not_false_iff, pi.smul_apply, smul_zero]
lemma scalar_inj [nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
inhabit n,
rw [← scalar_apply_eq r (arbitrary n), ← scalar_apply_eq s (arbitrary n), h] },
{ rintro rfl, refl }
end
end scalar
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring α] [fintype n]
lemma smul_eq_mul_diagonal [decidable_eq n] (M : matrix m n α) (a : α) :
a • M = M ⬝ diagonal (λ _, a) :=
by { ext, simp [mul_comm] }
@[simp] lemma mul_mul_right (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) (a : α) :
M ⬝ of (λ i j, a * N i j) = a • (M ⬝ N) :=
mul_smul M a N
lemma scalar.commute [decidable_eq n] (r : α) (M : matrix n n α) : commute (scalar n r) M :=
by simp [commute, semiconj_by]
end comm_semiring
section algebra
variables [fintype n] [decidable_eq n]
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring α] [semiring β] [algebra R α] [algebra R β]
instance : algebra R (matrix n n α) :=
{ commutes' := λ r x, begin
ext, simp [matrix.scalar, matrix.mul_apply, matrix.one_apply, algebra.commutes, smul_ite], end,
smul_def' := λ r x, begin ext, simp [matrix.scalar, algebra.smul_def r], end,
..((matrix.scalar n).comp (algebra_map R α)) }
lemma algebra_map_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebra_map R (matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebra_map R α r else 0 :=
begin
dsimp [algebra_map, algebra.to_ring_hom, matrix.scalar],
split_ifs with h; simp [h, matrix.one_apply_ne],
end
lemma algebra_map_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebra_map R (matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebra_map R (n → α) r) :=
matrix.ext $ λ i j, algebra_map_matrix_apply
@[simp] lemma algebra_map_eq_smul (r : R) :
algebra_map R (matrix n n R) r = r • (1 : matrix n n R) := rfl
lemma algebra_map_eq_diagonal_ring_hom :
algebra_map R (matrix n n α) = (diagonal_ring_hom n α).comp (algebra_map R _) :=
ring_hom.ext algebra_map_eq_diagonal
@[simp] lemma map_algebra_map (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebra_map R α r) = algebra_map R β r) :
(algebra_map R (matrix n n α) r).map f = algebra_map R (matrix n n β) r :=
begin
rw [algebra_map_eq_diagonal, algebra_map_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf],
congr' 1 with x,
simp only [hf₂, pi.algebra_map_apply]
end
variables (R)
/-- `matrix.diagonal` as an `alg_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonal_alg_hom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] matrix n n α :=
{ to_fun := diagonal,
commutes' := λ r, (algebra_map_eq_diagonal r).symm,
.. diagonal_ring_hom n α }
end algebra
end matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `matrix.map`
-/
namespace equiv
/-- The `equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as an `equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def map_matrix (f : α ≃ β) : matrix m n α ≃ matrix m n β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
inv_fun := λ M, M.map f.symm,
left_inv := λ M, matrix.ext $ λ _ _, f.symm_apply_apply _,
right_inv := λ M, matrix.ext $ λ _ _, f.apply_symm_apply _, }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_refl : (equiv.refl α).map_matrix = equiv.refl (matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) :
f.map_matrix.symm = (f.symm.map_matrix : matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.map_matrix.trans g.map_matrix = ((f.trans g).map_matrix : matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end equiv
namespace add_monoid_hom
variables [add_zero_class α] [add_zero_class β] [add_zero_class γ]
/-- The `add_monoid_hom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `add_monoid_hom` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def map_matrix (f : α →+ β) : matrix m n α →+ matrix m n β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
map_zero' := matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero,
map_add' := matrix.map_add f f.map_add }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_id : (add_monoid_hom.id α).map_matrix = add_monoid_hom.id (matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.map_matrix.comp g.map_matrix = ((f.comp g).map_matrix : matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
end add_monoid_hom
namespace add_equiv
variables [has_add α] [has_add β] [has_add γ]
/-- The `add_equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `add_equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as an `add_equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def map_matrix (f : α ≃+ β) : matrix m n α ≃+ matrix m n β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
inv_fun := λ M, M.map f.symm,
map_add' := matrix.map_add f f.map_add,
.. f.to_equiv.map_matrix }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_refl : (add_equiv.refl α).map_matrix = add_equiv.refl (matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) :
f.map_matrix.symm = (f.symm.map_matrix : matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.map_matrix.trans g.map_matrix = ((f.trans g).map_matrix : matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
end add_equiv
namespace linear_map
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid α] [add_comm_monoid β] [add_comm_monoid γ]
variables [module R α] [module R β] [module R γ]
/-- The `linear_map` between spaces of matrices induced by a `linear_map` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as a `linear_map`. -/
@[simps]
def map_matrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : matrix m n α →ₗ[R] matrix m n β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
map_add' := matrix.map_add f f.map_add,
map_smul' := λ r, matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r), }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_id : linear_map.id.map_matrix = (linear_map.id : matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.map_matrix.comp g.map_matrix = ((f.comp g).map_matrix : matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
end linear_map
namespace linear_equiv
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid α] [add_comm_monoid β] [add_comm_monoid γ]
variables [module R α] [module R β] [module R γ]
/-- The `linear_equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `linear_equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as an `linear_equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def map_matrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] matrix m n β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
inv_fun := λ M, M.map f.symm,
.. f.to_equiv.map_matrix,
.. f.to_linear_map.map_matrix }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_refl :
(linear_equiv.refl R α).map_matrix = linear_equiv.refl R (matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.map_matrix.symm = (f.symm.map_matrix : matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.map_matrix.trans g.map_matrix = ((f.trans g).map_matrix : matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
end linear_equiv
namespace ring_hom
variables [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
variables [non_assoc_semiring α] [non_assoc_semiring β] [non_assoc_semiring γ]
/-- The `ring_hom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `ring_hom` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as a `ring_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def map_matrix (f : α →+* β) : matrix m m α →+* matrix m m β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := λ L M, matrix.map_mul,
.. f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_matrix }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_id : (ring_hom.id α).map_matrix = ring_hom.id (matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.map_matrix.comp g.map_matrix = ((f.comp g).map_matrix : matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end ring_hom
namespace ring_equiv
variables [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
variables [non_assoc_semiring α] [non_assoc_semiring β] [non_assoc_semiring γ]
/-- The `ring_equiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `ring_equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as a `ring_equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def map_matrix (f : α ≃+* β) : matrix m m α ≃+* matrix m m β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
inv_fun := λ M, M.map f.symm,
.. f.to_ring_hom.map_matrix,
.. f.to_add_equiv.map_matrix }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_refl :
(ring_equiv.refl α).map_matrix = ring_equiv.refl (matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) :
f.map_matrix.symm = (f.symm.map_matrix : matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.map_matrix.trans g.map_matrix = ((f.trans g).map_matrix : matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
end ring_equiv
namespace alg_hom
variables [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring α] [semiring β] [semiring γ]
variables [algebra R α] [algebra R β] [algebra R γ]
/-- The `alg_hom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `alg_hom` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as a `alg_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def map_matrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : matrix m m α →ₐ[R] matrix m m β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
commutes' := λ r, matrix.map_algebra_map r f f.map_zero (f.commutes r),
.. f.to_ring_hom.map_matrix }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_id : (alg_hom.id R α).map_matrix = alg_hom.id R (matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.map_matrix.comp g.map_matrix = ((f.comp g).map_matrix : matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end alg_hom
namespace alg_equiv
variables [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring α] [semiring β] [semiring γ]
variables [algebra R α] [algebra R β] [algebra R γ]
/-- The `alg_equiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `alg_equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `matrix.map` as a `alg_equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def map_matrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] matrix m m β :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.map f,
inv_fun := λ M, M.map f.symm,
.. f.to_alg_hom.map_matrix,
.. f.to_ring_equiv.map_matrix }
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_refl :
alg_equiv.refl.map_matrix = (alg_equiv.refl : matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.map_matrix.symm = (f.symm.map_matrix : matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_matrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.map_matrix.trans g.map_matrix = ((f.trans g).map_matrix : matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end alg_equiv
open_locale matrix
namespace matrix
/-- For two vectors `w` and `v`, `vec_mul_vec w v i j` is defined to be `w i * v j`.
Put another way, `vec_mul_vec w v` is exactly `col w ⬝ row v`. -/
def vec_mul_vec [has_mul α] (w : m → α) (v : n → α) : matrix m n α
| x y := w x * v y
lemma vec_mul_vec_eq [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α] (w : m → α) (v : n → α) :
vec_mul_vec w v = (col w) ⬝ (row v) :=
by { ext i j, simp only [vec_mul_vec, mul_apply, fintype.univ_punit, finset.sum_singleton], refl }
section non_unital_non_assoc_semiring
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α]
/-- `mul_vec M v` is the matrix-vector product of `M` and `v`, where `v` is seen as a column matrix.
Put another way, `mul_vec M v` is the vector whose entries
are those of `M ⬝ col v` (see `col_mul_vec`). -/
def mul_vec [fintype n] (M : matrix m n α) (v : n → α) : m → α
| i := (λ j, M i j) ⬝ᵥ v
/-- `vec_mul v M` is the vector-matrix product of `v` and `M`, where `v` is seen as a row matrix.
Put another way, `vec_mul v M` is the vector whose entries
are those of `row v ⬝ M` (see `row_vec_mul`). -/
def vec_mul [fintype m] (v : m → α) (M : matrix m n α) : n → α
| j := v ⬝ᵥ (λ i, M i j)
/-- Left multiplication by a matrix, as an `add_monoid_hom` from vectors to vectors. -/
@[simps] def mul_vec.add_monoid_hom_left [fintype n] (v : n → α) : matrix m n α →+ m → α :=
{ to_fun := λ M, mul_vec M v,
map_zero' := by ext; simp [mul_vec]; refl,
map_add' := λ x y, by { ext m, apply add_dot_product } }
lemma mul_vec_diagonal [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (v w : m → α) (x : m) :
mul_vec (diagonal v) w x = v x * w x :=
diagonal_dot_product v w x
lemma vec_mul_diagonal [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (v w : m → α) (x : m) :
vec_mul v (diagonal w) x = v x * w x :=
dot_product_diagonal' v w x
/-- Associate the dot product of `mul_vec` to the left. -/
lemma dot_product_mul_vec [fintype n] [fintype m] [non_unital_semiring R]
(v : m → R) (A : matrix m n R) (w : n → R) :
v ⬝ᵥ mul_vec A w = vec_mul v A ⬝ᵥ w :=
by simp only [dot_product, vec_mul, mul_vec, finset.mul_sum, finset.sum_mul, mul_assoc];
exact finset.sum_comm
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_zero [fintype n] (A : matrix m n α) : mul_vec A 0 = 0 :=
by { ext, simp [mul_vec] }
@[simp] lemma zero_vec_mul [fintype m] (A : matrix m n α) : vec_mul 0 A = 0 :=
by { ext, simp [vec_mul] }
@[simp] lemma zero_mul_vec [fintype n] (v : n → α) : mul_vec (0 : matrix m n α) v = 0 :=
by { ext, simp [mul_vec] }
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_zero [fintype m] (v : m → α) : vec_mul v (0 : matrix m n α) = 0 :=
by { ext, simp [vec_mul] }
lemma smul_mul_vec_assoc [fintype n] [monoid R] [distrib_mul_action R α] [is_scalar_tower R α α]
(a : R) (A : matrix m n α) (b : n → α) :
(a • A).mul_vec b = a • (A.mul_vec b) :=
by { ext, apply smul_dot_product, }
lemma mul_vec_add [fintype n] (A : matrix m n α) (x y : n → α) :
A.mul_vec (x + y) = A.mul_vec x + A.mul_vec y :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_add }
lemma add_mul_vec [fintype n] (A B : matrix m n α) (x : n → α) :
(A + B).mul_vec x = A.mul_vec x + B.mul_vec x :=
by { ext, apply add_dot_product }
lemma vec_mul_add [fintype m] (A B : matrix m n α) (x : m → α) :
vec_mul x (A + B) = vec_mul x A + vec_mul x B :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_add }
lemma add_vec_mul [fintype m] (A : matrix m n α) (x y : m → α) :
vec_mul (x + y) A = vec_mul x A + vec_mul y A :=
by { ext, apply add_dot_product }
lemma vec_mul_smul [fintype n] [monoid R] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring S] [distrib_mul_action R S]
[is_scalar_tower R S S] (M : matrix n m S) (b : R) (v : n → S) :
M.vec_mul (b • v) = b • M.vec_mul v :=
by { ext i, simp only [vec_mul, dot_product, finset.smul_sum, pi.smul_apply, smul_mul_assoc] }
lemma mul_vec_smul [fintype n] [monoid R] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring S] [distrib_mul_action R S]
[smul_comm_class R S S] (M : matrix m n S) (b : R) (v : n → S) :
M.mul_vec (b • v) = b • M.mul_vec v :=
by { ext i, simp only [mul_vec, dot_product, finset.smul_sum, pi.smul_apply, mul_smul_comm] }
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_single [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring R]
(M : matrix m n R) (j : n) (x : R) :
M.mul_vec (pi.single j x) = (λ i, M i j * x) :=
funext $ λ i, dot_product_single _ _ _
@[simp] lemma single_vec_mul [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring R]
(M : matrix m n R) (i : m) (x : R) :
vec_mul (pi.single i x) M = (λ j, x * M i j) :=
funext $ λ i, single_dot_product _ _ _
@[simp] lemma diagonal_mul_vec_single [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring R]
(v : n → R) (j : n) (x : R) :
(diagonal v).mul_vec (pi.single j x) = pi.single j (v j * x) :=
begin
ext i,
rw mul_vec_diagonal,
exact pi.apply_single (λ i x, v i * x) (λ i, mul_zero _) j x i,
end
@[simp] lemma single_vec_mul_diagonal [fintype n] [decidable_eq n] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring R]
(v : n → R) (j : n) (x : R) :
vec_mul (pi.single j x) (diagonal v) = pi.single j (x * v j) :=
begin
ext i,
rw vec_mul_diagonal,
exact pi.apply_single (λ i x, x * v i) (λ i, zero_mul _) j x i,
end
end non_unital_non_assoc_semiring
section non_unital_semiring
variables [non_unital_semiring α]
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_vec_mul [fintype n] [fintype m]
(v : m → α) (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) :
vec_mul (vec_mul v M) N = vec_mul v (M ⬝ N) :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_assoc }
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_mul_vec [fintype n] [fintype o]
(v : o → α) (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) :
mul_vec M (mul_vec N v) = mul_vec (M ⬝ N) v :=
by { ext, symmetry, apply dot_product_assoc }
lemma star_mul_vec [fintype n] [star_ring α] (M : matrix m n α) (v : n → α) :
star (M.mul_vec v) = vec_mul (star v) (Mᴴ) :=
funext $ λ i, (star_dot_product_star _ _).symm
lemma star_vec_mul [fintype m] [star_ring α] (M : matrix m n α) (v : m → α) :
star (M.vec_mul v) = (Mᴴ).mul_vec (star v) :=
funext $ λ i, (star_dot_product_star _ _).symm
lemma mul_vec_conj_transpose [fintype m] [star_ring α] (A : matrix m n α) (x : m → α) :
mul_vec Aᴴ x = star (vec_mul (star x) A) :=
funext $ λ i, star_dot_product _ _
lemma vec_mul_conj_transpose [fintype n] [star_ring α] (A : matrix m n α) (x : n → α) :
vec_mul x Aᴴ = star (mul_vec A (star x)) :=
funext $ λ i, dot_product_star _ _
end non_unital_semiring
section non_assoc_semiring
variables [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] [non_assoc_semiring α]
@[simp] lemma one_mul_vec (v : m → α) : mul_vec 1 v = v :=
by { ext, rw [←diagonal_one, mul_vec_diagonal, one_mul] }
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_one (v : m → α) : vec_mul v 1 = v :=
by { ext, rw [←diagonal_one, vec_mul_diagonal, mul_one] }
end non_assoc_semiring
section non_unital_non_assoc_ring
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α]
lemma neg_vec_mul [fintype m] (v : m → α) (A : matrix m n α) : vec_mul (-v) A = - vec_mul v A :=
by { ext, apply neg_dot_product }
lemma vec_mul_neg [fintype m] (v : m → α) (A : matrix m n α) : vec_mul v (-A) = - vec_mul v A :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_neg }
lemma neg_mul_vec [fintype n] (v : n → α) (A : matrix m n α) : mul_vec (-A) v = - mul_vec A v :=
by { ext, apply neg_dot_product }
lemma mul_vec_neg [fintype n] (v : n → α) (A : matrix m n α) : mul_vec A (-v) = - mul_vec A v :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_neg }
lemma sub_mul_vec [fintype n] (A B : matrix m n α) (x : n → α) :
mul_vec (A - B) x = mul_vec A x - mul_vec B x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_mul_vec, neg_mul_vec]
lemma vec_mul_sub [fintype m] (A B : matrix m n α) (x : m → α) :
vec_mul x (A - B) = vec_mul x A - vec_mul x B :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, vec_mul_add, vec_mul_neg]
end non_unital_non_assoc_ring
section non_unital_comm_semiring
variables [non_unital_comm_semiring α]
lemma mul_vec_transpose [fintype m] (A : matrix m n α) (x : m → α) :
mul_vec Aᵀ x = vec_mul x A :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_comm }
lemma vec_mul_transpose [fintype n] (A : matrix m n α) (x : n → α) :
vec_mul x Aᵀ = mul_vec A x :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_comm }
lemma mul_vec_vec_mul [fintype n] [fintype o] (A : matrix m n α) (B : matrix o n α) (x : o → α) :
mul_vec A (vec_mul x B) = mul_vec (A ⬝ Bᵀ) x :=
by rw [← mul_vec_mul_vec, mul_vec_transpose]
lemma vec_mul_mul_vec [fintype m] [fintype n] (A : matrix m n α) (B : matrix m o α) (x : n → α) :
vec_mul (mul_vec A x) B = vec_mul x (Aᵀ ⬝ B) :=
by rw [← vec_mul_vec_mul, vec_mul_transpose]
end non_unital_comm_semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring α]
lemma mul_vec_smul_assoc [fintype n] (A : matrix m n α) (b : n → α) (a : α) :
A.mul_vec (a • b) = a • (A.mul_vec b) :=
by { ext, apply dot_product_smul }
end comm_semiring
section transpose
open_locale matrix
/--
Tell `simp` what the entries are in a transposed matrix.
Compare with `mul_apply`, `diagonal_apply_eq`, etc.
-/
@[simp] lemma transpose_apply (M : matrix m n α) (i j) : M.transpose j i = M i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma transpose_transpose (M : matrix m n α) :
Mᵀᵀ = M :=
by ext; refl
@[simp] lemma transpose_zero [has_zero α] : (0 : matrix m n α)ᵀ = 0 :=
by ext i j; refl
@[simp] lemma transpose_one [decidable_eq n] [has_zero α] [has_one α] : (1 : matrix n n α)ᵀ = 1 :=
begin
ext i j,
unfold has_one.one transpose,
by_cases i = j,
{ simp only [h, diagonal_apply_eq] },
{ simp only [diagonal_apply_ne _ h, diagonal_apply_ne' _ h] }
end
@[simp] lemma transpose_add [has_add α] (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix m n α) :
(M + N)ᵀ = Mᵀ + Nᵀ :=
by { ext i j, simp }
@[simp] lemma transpose_sub [has_sub α] (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix m n α) :
(M - N)ᵀ = Mᵀ - Nᵀ :=
by { ext i j, simp }
@[simp] lemma transpose_mul [add_comm_monoid α] [comm_semigroup α] [fintype n]
(M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n l α) : (M ⬝ N)ᵀ = Nᵀ ⬝ Mᵀ :=
begin
ext i j,
apply dot_product_comm
end
@[simp] lemma transpose_smul {R : Type*} [has_smul R α] (c : R) (M : matrix m n α) :
(c • M)ᵀ = c • Mᵀ :=
by { ext i j, refl }
@[simp] lemma transpose_neg [has_neg α] (M : matrix m n α) :
(- M)ᵀ = - Mᵀ :=
by ext i j; refl
lemma transpose_map {f : α → β} {M : matrix m n α} : Mᵀ.map f = (M.map f)ᵀ :=
by { ext, refl }
variables (m n α)
/-- `matrix.transpose` as an `add_equiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transpose_add_equiv [has_add α] : matrix m n α ≃+ matrix n m α :=
{ to_fun := transpose,
inv_fun := transpose,
left_inv := transpose_transpose,
right_inv := transpose_transpose,
map_add' := transpose_add }
@[simp] lemma transpose_add_equiv_symm [has_add α] :
(transpose_add_equiv m n α).symm = transpose_add_equiv n m α := rfl
variables {m n α}
lemma transpose_list_sum [add_monoid α] (l : list (matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
(transpose_add_equiv m n α).to_add_monoid_hom.map_list_sum l
lemma transpose_multiset_sum [add_comm_monoid α] (s : multiset (matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transpose_add_equiv m n α).to_add_monoid_hom.map_multiset_sum s
lemma transpose_sum [add_comm_monoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (M : ι → matrix m n α) :
(∑ i in s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i in s, (M i)ᵀ :=
(transpose_add_equiv m n α).to_add_monoid_hom.map_sum _ s
variables (m n R α)
/-- `matrix.transpose` as a `linear_map` -/
@[simps apply]
def transpose_linear_equiv [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid α] [module R α] :
matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] matrix n m α := { map_smul' := transpose_smul, ..transpose_add_equiv m n α}
@[simp] lemma transpose_linear_equiv_symm [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid α] [module R α] :
(transpose_linear_equiv m n R α).symm = transpose_linear_equiv n m R α := rfl
variables {m n R α}
variables (m α)
/-- `matrix.transpose` as a `ring_equiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transpose_ring_equiv [add_comm_monoid α] [comm_semigroup α] [fintype m] :
matrix m m α ≃+* (matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ to_fun := λ M, mul_opposite.op (Mᵀ),
inv_fun := λ M, M.unopᵀ,
map_mul' := λ M N, (congr_arg mul_opposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans
(mul_opposite.op_mul _ _),
..(transpose_add_equiv m m α).trans mul_opposite.op_add_equiv }
variables {m α}
@[simp] lemma transpose_pow [comm_semiring α] [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (M : matrix m m α)
(k : ℕ) : (M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
mul_opposite.op_injective $ map_pow (transpose_ring_equiv m α) M k
lemma transpose_list_prod [comm_semiring α] [fintype m] [decidable_eq m] (l : list (matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transpose_ring_equiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variables (R m α)
/-- `matrix.transpose` as an `alg_equiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transpose_alg_equiv [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring α] [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
[algebra R α] : matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ to_fun := λ M, mul_opposite.op (Mᵀ),
commutes' := λ r, by simp only [algebra_map_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose,
mul_opposite.algebra_map_apply],
..(transpose_add_equiv m m α).trans mul_opposite.op_add_equiv,
..transpose_ring_equiv m α }
variables {R m α}
end transpose
section conj_transpose
open_locale matrix
/--
Tell `simp` what the entries are in a conjugate transposed matrix.
Compare with `mul_apply`, `diagonal_apply_eq`, etc.
-/
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_apply [has_star α] (M : matrix m n α) (i j) :
M.conj_transpose j i = star (M i j) := rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_conj_transpose [has_involutive_star α] (M : matrix m n α) :
Mᴴᴴ = M :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_zero [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] : (0 : matrix m n α)ᴴ = 0 :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_one [decidable_eq n] [semiring α] [star_ring α]:
(1 : matrix n n α)ᴴ = 1 :=
by simp [conj_transpose]
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_add [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] (M N : matrix m n α) :
(M + N)ᴴ = Mᴴ + Nᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_sub [add_group α] [star_add_monoid α] (M N : matrix m n α) :
(M - N)ᴴ = Mᴴ - Nᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
/-- Note that `star_module` is quite a strong requirement; as such we also provide the following
variants which this lemma would not apply to:
* `matrix.conj_transpose_smul_non_comm`
* `matrix.conj_transpose_nsmul`
* `matrix.conj_transpose_zsmul`
* `matrix.conj_transpose_nat_cast_smul`
* `matrix.conj_transpose_int_cast_smul`
* `matrix.conj_transpose_inv_nat_cast_smul`
* `matrix.conj_transpose_inv_int_cast_smul`
* `matrix.conj_transpose_rat_smul`
* `matrix.conj_transpose_rat_cast_smul`
-/
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_smul [has_star R] [has_star α] [has_smul R α] [star_module R α]
(c : R) (M : matrix m n α) :
(c • M)ᴴ = star c • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ λ i j, star_smul _ _
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_smul_non_comm [has_star R] [has_star α]
[has_smul R α] [has_smul Rᵐᵒᵖ α] (c : R) (M : matrix m n α)
(h : ∀ (r : R) (a : α), star (r • a) = mul_opposite.op (star r) • star a) :
(c • M)ᴴ = mul_opposite.op (star c) • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp [h]
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_smul_self [semigroup α] [star_semigroup α] (c : α)
(M : matrix m n α) : (c • M)ᴴ = mul_opposite.op (star c) • Mᴴ :=
conj_transpose_smul_non_comm c M star_mul
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_nsmul [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] (c : ℕ) (M : matrix m n α) :
(c • M)ᴴ = c • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_zsmul [add_group α] [star_add_monoid α] (c : ℤ) (M : matrix m n α) :
(c • M)ᴴ = c • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_nat_cast_smul [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid α]
[star_add_monoid α] [module R α] (c : ℕ) (M : matrix m n α) : ((c : R) • M)ᴴ = (c : R) • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_int_cast_smul [ring R] [add_comm_group α]
[star_add_monoid α] [module R α] (c : ℤ) (M : matrix m n α) : ((c : R) • M)ᴴ = (c : R) • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_inv_nat_cast_smul [division_ring R] [add_comm_group α]
[star_add_monoid α] [module R α] (c : ℕ) (M : matrix m n α) : ((c : R)⁻¹ • M)ᴴ = (c : R)⁻¹ • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_inv_int_cast_smul [division_ring R] [add_comm_group α]
[star_add_monoid α] [module R α] (c : ℤ) (M : matrix m n α) : ((c : R)⁻¹ • M)ᴴ = (c : R)⁻¹ • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_rat_cast_smul [division_ring R] [add_comm_group α] [star_add_monoid α]
[module R α] (c : ℚ) (M : matrix m n α) : ((c : R) • M)ᴴ = (c : R) • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_rat_smul [add_comm_group α] [star_add_monoid α] [module ℚ α] (c : ℚ)
(M : matrix m n α) : (c • M)ᴴ = c • Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_mul [fintype n] [non_unital_semiring α] [star_ring α]
(M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n l α) : (M ⬝ N)ᴴ = Nᴴ ⬝ Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp [mul_apply]
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_neg [add_group α] [star_add_monoid α] (M : matrix m n α) :
(- M)ᴴ = - Mᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ by simp
lemma conj_transpose_map [has_star α] [has_star β] {A : matrix m n α} (f : α → β)
(hf : function.semiconj f star star) :
Aᴴ.map f = (A.map f)ᴴ :=
matrix.ext $ λ i j, hf _
variables (m n α)
/-- `matrix.conj_transpose` as an `add_equiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def conj_transpose_add_equiv [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] : matrix m n α ≃+ matrix n m α :=
{ to_fun := conj_transpose,
inv_fun := conj_transpose,
left_inv := conj_transpose_conj_transpose,
right_inv := conj_transpose_conj_transpose,
map_add' := conj_transpose_add }
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_add_equiv_symm [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] :
(conj_transpose_add_equiv m n α).symm = conj_transpose_add_equiv n m α := rfl
variables {m n α}
lemma conj_transpose_list_sum [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] (l : list (matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᴴ = (l.map conj_transpose).sum :=
(conj_transpose_add_equiv m n α).to_add_monoid_hom.map_list_sum l
lemma conj_transpose_multiset_sum [add_comm_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α]
(s : multiset (matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᴴ = (s.map conj_transpose).sum :=
(conj_transpose_add_equiv m n α).to_add_monoid_hom.map_multiset_sum s
lemma conj_transpose_sum [add_comm_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι)
(M : ι → matrix m n α) :
(∑ i in s, M i)ᴴ = ∑ i in s, (M i)ᴴ :=
(conj_transpose_add_equiv m n α).to_add_monoid_hom.map_sum _ s
variables (m n R α)
/-- `matrix.conj_transpose` as a `linear_map` -/
@[simps apply]
def conj_transpose_linear_equiv [comm_semiring R] [star_ring R] [add_comm_monoid α]
[star_add_monoid α] [module R α] [star_module R α] : matrix m n α ≃ₗ⋆[R] matrix n m α :=
{ map_smul' := conj_transpose_smul, ..conj_transpose_add_equiv m n α}
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_linear_equiv_symm [comm_semiring R] [star_ring R] [add_comm_monoid α]
[star_add_monoid α] [module R α] [star_module R α] :
(conj_transpose_linear_equiv m n R α).symm = conj_transpose_linear_equiv n m R α := rfl
variables {m n R α}
variables (m α)
/-- `matrix.conj_transpose` as a `ring_equiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def conj_transpose_ring_equiv [semiring α] [star_ring α] [fintype m] :
matrix m m α ≃+* (matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ to_fun := λ M, mul_opposite.op (Mᴴ),
inv_fun := λ M, M.unopᴴ,
map_mul' := λ M N, (congr_arg mul_opposite.op (conj_transpose_mul M N)).trans
(mul_opposite.op_mul _ _),
..(conj_transpose_add_equiv m m α).trans mul_opposite.op_add_equiv }
variables {m α}
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_pow [semiring α] [star_ring α] [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
(M : matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) : (M ^ k)ᴴ = Mᴴ ^ k :=
mul_opposite.op_injective $ map_pow (conj_transpose_ring_equiv m α) M k
lemma conj_transpose_list_prod [semiring α] [star_ring α] [fintype m] [decidable_eq m]
(l : list (matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᴴ = (l.map conj_transpose).reverse.prod :=
(conj_transpose_ring_equiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
end conj_transpose
section star
/-- When `α` has a star operation, square matrices `matrix n n α` have a star
operation equal to `matrix.conj_transpose`. -/
instance [has_star α] : has_star (matrix n n α) := {star := conj_transpose}
lemma star_eq_conj_transpose [has_star α] (M : matrix m m α) : star M = Mᴴ := rfl
@[simp] lemma star_apply [has_star α] (M : matrix n n α) (i j) :
(star M) i j = star (M j i) := rfl
instance [has_involutive_star α] : has_involutive_star (matrix n n α) :=
{ star_involutive := conj_transpose_conj_transpose }
/-- When `α` is a `*`-additive monoid, `matrix.has_star` is also a `*`-additive monoid. -/
instance [add_monoid α] [star_add_monoid α] : star_add_monoid (matrix n n α) :=
{ star_add := conj_transpose_add }
/-- When `α` is a `*`-(semi)ring, `matrix.has_star` is also a `*`-(semi)ring. -/
instance [fintype n] [semiring α] [star_ring α] : star_ring (matrix n n α) :=
{ star_add := conj_transpose_add,
star_mul := conj_transpose_mul, }
/-- A version of `star_mul` for `⬝` instead of `*`. -/
lemma star_mul [fintype n] [non_unital_semiring α] [star_ring α] (M N : matrix n n α) :
star (M ⬝ N) = star N ⬝ star M := conj_transpose_mul _ _
end star
/-- Given maps `(r_reindex : l → m)` and `(c_reindex : o → n)` reindexing the rows and columns of
a matrix `M : matrix m n α`, the matrix `M.submatrix r_reindex c_reindex : matrix l o α` is defined
by `(M.submatrix r_reindex c_reindex) i j = M (r_reindex i) (c_reindex j)` for `(i,j) : l × o`.
Note that the total number of row and columns does not have to be preserved. -/
def submatrix (A : matrix m n α) (r_reindex : l → m) (c_reindex : o → n) : matrix l o α :=
of $ λ i j, A (r_reindex i) (c_reindex j)
@[simp] lemma submatrix_apply (A : matrix m n α) (r_reindex : l → m) (c_reindex : o → n) (i j) :
A.submatrix r_reindex c_reindex i j = A (r_reindex i) (c_reindex j) := rfl
@[simp] lemma submatrix_id_id (A : matrix m n α) :
A.submatrix id id = A :=
ext $ λ _ _, rfl
@[simp] lemma submatrix_submatrix {l₂ o₂ : Type*} (A : matrix m n α)
(r₁ : l → m) (c₁ : o → n) (r₂ : l₂ → l) (c₂ : o₂ → o) :
(A.submatrix r₁ c₁).submatrix r₂ c₂ = A.submatrix (r₁ ∘ r₂) (c₁ ∘ c₂) :=
ext $ λ _ _, rfl
@[simp] lemma transpose_submatrix (A : matrix m n α) (r_reindex : l → m) (c_reindex : o → n) :
(A.submatrix r_reindex c_reindex)ᵀ = Aᵀ.submatrix c_reindex r_reindex :=
ext $ λ _ _, rfl
@[simp] lemma conj_transpose_submatrix
[has_star α] (A : matrix m n α) (r_reindex : l → m) (c_reindex : o → n) :
(A.submatrix r_reindex c_reindex)ᴴ = Aᴴ.submatrix c_reindex r_reindex :=
ext $ λ _ _, rfl
lemma submatrix_add [has_add α] (A B : matrix m n α) :
((A + B).submatrix : (l → m) → (o → n) → matrix l o α) = A.submatrix + B.submatrix := rfl
lemma submatrix_neg [has_neg α] (A : matrix m n α) :
((-A).submatrix : (l → m) → (o → n) → matrix l o α) = -A.submatrix := rfl
lemma submatrix_sub [has_sub α] (A B : matrix m n α) :
((A - B).submatrix : (l → m) → (o → n) → matrix l o α) = A.submatrix - B.submatrix := rfl
@[simp] lemma submatrix_zero [has_zero α] :
((0 : matrix m n α).submatrix : (l → m) → (o → n) → matrix l o α) = 0 := rfl
lemma submatrix_smul {R : Type*} [has_smul R α] (r : R) (A : matrix m n α) :
((r • A : matrix m n α).submatrix : (l → m) → (o → n) → matrix l o α) = r • A.submatrix := rfl
lemma submatrix_map (f : α → β) (e₁ : l → m) (e₂ : o → n) (A : matrix m n α) :
(A.map f).submatrix e₁ e₂ = (A.submatrix e₁ e₂).map f := rfl
/-- Given a `(m × m)` diagonal matrix defined by a map `d : m → α`, if the reindexing map `e` is
injective, then the resulting matrix is again diagonal. -/
lemma submatrix_diagonal [has_zero α] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq l] (d : m → α) (e : l → m)
(he : function.injective e) :
(diagonal d).submatrix e e = diagonal (d ∘ e) :=
ext $ λ i j, begin
rw submatrix_apply,
by_cases h : i = j,
{ rw [h, diagonal_apply_eq, diagonal_apply_eq], },
{ rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ h, diagonal_apply_ne _ (he.ne h)], },
end
lemma submatrix_one [has_zero α] [has_one α] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq l] (e : l → m)
(he : function.injective e) :
(1 : matrix m m α).submatrix e e = 1 :=
submatrix_diagonal _ e he
lemma submatrix_mul [fintype n] [fintype o] [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α] {p q : Type*}
(M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n p α)
(e₁ : l → m) (e₂ : o → n) (e₃ : q → p) (he₂ : function.bijective e₂) :
(M ⬝ N).submatrix e₁ e₃ = (M.submatrix e₁ e₂) ⬝ (N.submatrix e₂ e₃) :=
ext $ λ _ _, (he₂.sum_comp _).symm
lemma diag_submatrix (A : matrix m m α) (e : l → m) : diag (A.submatrix e e) = A.diag ∘ e := rfl
/-! `simp` lemmas for `matrix.submatrix`s interaction with `matrix.diagonal`, `1`, and `matrix.mul`
for when the mappings are bundled. -/
@[simp]
lemma submatrix_diagonal_embedding [has_zero α] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq l] (d : m → α)
(e : l ↪ m) :
(diagonal d).submatrix e e = diagonal (d ∘ e) :=
submatrix_diagonal d e e.injective
@[simp]
lemma submatrix_diagonal_equiv [has_zero α] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq l] (d : m → α)
(e : l ≃ m) :
(diagonal d).submatrix e e = diagonal (d ∘ e) :=
submatrix_diagonal d e e.injective
@[simp]
lemma submatrix_one_embedding
[has_zero α] [has_one α] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq l] (e : l ↪ m) :
(1 : matrix m m α).submatrix e e = 1 :=
submatrix_one e e.injective
@[simp]
lemma submatrix_one_equiv [has_zero α] [has_one α] [decidable_eq m] [decidable_eq l] (e : l ≃ m) :
(1 : matrix m m α).submatrix e e = 1 :=
submatrix_one e e.injective
@[simp]
lemma submatrix_mul_equiv [fintype n] [fintype o] [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α] {p q : Type*}
(M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n p α) (e₁ : l → m) (e₂ : o ≃ n) (e₃ : q → p) :
(M.submatrix e₁ e₂) ⬝ (N.submatrix e₂ e₃) = (M ⬝ N).submatrix e₁ e₃ :=
(submatrix_mul M N e₁ e₂ e₃ e₂.bijective).symm
lemma mul_submatrix_one [fintype n] [fintype o] [non_assoc_semiring α] [decidable_eq o] (e₁ : n ≃ o)
(e₂ : l → o) (M : matrix m n α) :
M ⬝ (1 : matrix o o α).submatrix e₁ e₂ = submatrix M id (e₁.symm ∘ e₂) :=
begin
let A := M.submatrix id e₁.symm,
have : M = A.submatrix id e₁,
{ simp only [submatrix_submatrix, function.comp.right_id, submatrix_id_id,
equiv.symm_comp_self], },
rw [this, submatrix_mul_equiv],
simp only [matrix.mul_one, submatrix_submatrix, function.comp.right_id, submatrix_id_id,
equiv.symm_comp_self],
end
lemma one_submatrix_mul [fintype m] [fintype o] [non_assoc_semiring α] [decidable_eq o] (e₁ : l → o)
(e₂ : m ≃ o) (M : matrix m n α) :
((1 : matrix o o α).submatrix e₁ e₂).mul M = submatrix M (e₂.symm ∘ e₁) id :=
begin
let A := M.submatrix e₂.symm id,
have : M = A.submatrix e₂ id,
{ simp only [submatrix_submatrix, function.comp.right_id, submatrix_id_id,
equiv.symm_comp_self], },
rw [this, submatrix_mul_equiv],
simp only [matrix.one_mul, submatrix_submatrix, function.comp.right_id, submatrix_id_id,
equiv.symm_comp_self],
end
/-- The natural map that reindexes a matrix's rows and columns with equivalent types is an
equivalence. -/
def reindex (eₘ : m ≃ l) (eₙ : n ≃ o) : matrix m n α ≃ matrix l o α :=
{ to_fun := λ M, M.submatrix eₘ.symm eₙ.symm,
inv_fun := λ M, M.submatrix eₘ eₙ,
left_inv := λ M, by simp,
right_inv := λ M, by simp, }
@[simp] lemma reindex_apply (eₘ : m ≃ l) (eₙ : n ≃ o) (M : matrix m n α) :
reindex eₘ eₙ M = M.submatrix eₘ.symm eₙ.symm :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_refl_refl (A : matrix m n α) :
reindex (equiv.refl _) (equiv.refl _) A = A :=
A.submatrix_id_id
@[simp] lemma reindex_symm (eₘ : m ≃ l) (eₙ : n ≃ o) :
(reindex eₘ eₙ).symm = (reindex eₘ.symm eₙ.symm : matrix l o α ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma reindex_trans {l₂ o₂ : Type*} (eₘ : m ≃ l) (eₙ : n ≃ o)
(eₘ₂ : l ≃ l₂) (eₙ₂ : o ≃ o₂) : (reindex eₘ eₙ).trans (reindex eₘ₂ eₙ₂) =
(reindex (eₘ.trans eₘ₂) (eₙ.trans eₙ₂) : matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
equiv.ext $ λ A, (A.submatrix_submatrix eₘ.symm eₙ.symm eₘ₂.symm eₙ₂.symm : _)
lemma transpose_reindex (eₘ : m ≃ l) (eₙ : n ≃ o) (M : matrix m n α) :
(reindex eₘ eₙ M)ᵀ = (reindex eₙ eₘ Mᵀ) :=
rfl
lemma conj_transpose_reindex [has_star α] (eₘ : m ≃ l) (eₙ : n ≃ o) (M : matrix m n α) :
(reindex eₘ eₙ M)ᴴ = (reindex eₙ eₘ Mᴴ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma submatrix_mul_transpose_submatrix [fintype m] [fintype n] [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α]
(e : m ≃ n) (M : matrix m n α) :
(M.submatrix id e) ⬝ (Mᵀ).submatrix e id = M ⬝ Mᵀ :=
by rw [submatrix_mul_equiv, submatrix_id_id]
/-- The left `n × l` part of a `n × (l+r)` matrix. -/
@[reducible]
def sub_left {m l r : nat} (A : matrix (fin m) (fin (l + r)) α) : matrix (fin m) (fin l) α :=
submatrix A id (fin.cast_add r)
/-- The right `n × r` part of a `n × (l+r)` matrix. -/
@[reducible]
def sub_right {m l r : nat} (A : matrix (fin m) (fin (l + r)) α) : matrix (fin m) (fin r) α :=
submatrix A id (fin.nat_add l)
/-- The top `u × n` part of a `(u+d) × n` matrix. -/
@[reducible]
def sub_up {d u n : nat} (A : matrix (fin (u + d)) (fin n) α) : matrix (fin u) (fin n) α :=
submatrix A (fin.cast_add d) id
/-- The bottom `d × n` part of a `(u+d) × n` matrix. -/
@[reducible]
def sub_down {d u n : nat} (A : matrix (fin (u + d)) (fin n) α) : matrix (fin d) (fin n) α :=
submatrix A (fin.nat_add u) id
/-- The top-right `u × r` part of a `(u+d) × (l+r)` matrix. -/
@[reducible]
def sub_up_right {d u l r : nat} (A: matrix (fin (u + d)) (fin (l + r)) α) :
matrix (fin u) (fin r) α :=
sub_up (sub_right A)
/-- The bottom-right `d × r` part of a `(u+d) × (l+r)` matrix. -/
@[reducible]
def sub_down_right {d u l r : nat} (A : matrix (fin (u + d)) (fin (l + r)) α) :
matrix (fin d) (fin r) α :=
sub_down (sub_right A)
/-- The top-left `u × l` part of a `(u+d) × (l+r)` matrix. -/
@[reducible]
def sub_up_left {d u l r : nat} (A : matrix (fin (u + d)) (fin (l + r)) α) :
matrix (fin u) (fin (l)) α :=
sub_up (sub_left A)
/-- The bottom-left `d × l` part of a `(u+d) × (l+r)` matrix. -/
@[reducible]
def sub_down_left {d u l r : nat} (A: matrix (fin (u + d)) (fin (l + r)) α) :
matrix (fin d) (fin (l)) α :=
sub_down (sub_left A)
section row_col
/-!
### `row_col` section
Simplification lemmas for `matrix.row` and `matrix.col`.
-/
open_locale matrix
@[simp] lemma col_add [has_add α] (v w : m → α) : col (v + w) = col v + col w := by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma col_smul [has_smul R α] (x : R) (v : m → α) : col (x • v) = x • col v :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma row_add [has_add α] (v w : m → α) : row (v + w) = row v + row w := by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma row_smul [has_smul R α] (x : R) (v : m → α) : row (x • v) = x • row v :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma col_apply (v : m → α) (i j) : matrix.col v i j = v i := rfl
@[simp] lemma row_apply (v : m → α) (i j) : matrix.row v i j = v j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma transpose_col (v : m → α) : (matrix.col v)ᵀ = matrix.row v := by { ext, refl }
@[simp]
lemma transpose_row (v : m → α) : (matrix.row v)ᵀ = matrix.col v := by { ext, refl }
@[simp]
lemma conj_transpose_col [has_star α] (v : m → α) : (col v)ᴴ = row (star v) := by { ext, refl }
@[simp]
lemma conj_transpose_row [has_star α] (v : m → α) : (row v)ᴴ = col (star v) := by { ext, refl }
lemma row_vec_mul [fintype m] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] (M : matrix m n α) (v : m → α) :
matrix.row (matrix.vec_mul v M) = matrix.row v ⬝ M := by {ext, refl}
lemma col_vec_mul [fintype m] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] (M : matrix m n α) (v : m → α) :
matrix.col (matrix.vec_mul v M) = (matrix.row v ⬝ M)ᵀ := by {ext, refl}
lemma col_mul_vec [fintype n] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] (M : matrix m n α) (v : n → α) :
matrix.col (matrix.mul_vec M v) = M ⬝ matrix.col v := by {ext, refl}
lemma row_mul_vec [fintype n] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] (M : matrix m n α) (v : n → α) :
matrix.row (matrix.mul_vec M v) = (M ⬝ matrix.col v)ᵀ := by {ext, refl}
@[simp]
lemma row_mul_col_apply [fintype m] [has_mul α] [add_comm_monoid α] (v w : m → α) (i j) :
(row v ⬝ col w) i j = v ⬝ᵥ w :=
rfl
end row_col
section update
/-- Update, i.e. replace the `i`th row of matrix `A` with the values in `b`. -/
def update_row [decidable_eq m] (M : matrix m n α) (i : m) (b : n → α) : matrix m n α :=
function.update M i b
/-- Update, i.e. replace the `j`th column of matrix `A` with the values in `b`. -/
def update_column [decidable_eq n] (M : matrix m n α) (j : n) (b : m → α) : matrix m n α :=
λ i, function.update (M i) j (b i)
variables {M : matrix m n α} {i : m} {j : n} {b : n → α} {c : m → α}
@[simp] lemma update_row_self [decidable_eq m] : update_row M i b i = b :=
function.update_same i b M
@[simp] lemma update_column_self [decidable_eq n] : update_column M j c i j = c i :=
function.update_same j (c i) (M i)
@[simp] lemma update_row_ne [decidable_eq m] {i' : m} (i_ne : i' ≠ i) :
update_row M i b i' = M i' := function.update_noteq i_ne b M
@[simp] lemma update_column_ne [decidable_eq n] {j' : n} (j_ne : j' ≠ j) :
update_column M j c i j' = M i j' := function.update_noteq j_ne (c i) (M i)
lemma update_row_apply [decidable_eq m] {i' : m} :
update_row M i b i' j = if i' = i then b j else M i' j :=
begin
by_cases i' = i,
{ rw [h, update_row_self, if_pos rfl] },
{ rwa [update_row_ne h, if_neg h] }
end
lemma update_column_apply [decidable_eq n] {j' : n} :
update_column M j c i j' = if j' = j then c i else M i j' :=
begin
by_cases j' = j,
{ rw [h, update_column_self, if_pos rfl] },
{ rwa [update_column_ne h, if_neg h] }
end
@[simp] lemma update_column_subsingleton [subsingleton n] (A : matrix m n R)
(i : n) (b : m → R) :
A.update_column i b = (col b).submatrix id (function.const n ()) :=
begin
ext x y,
simp [update_column_apply, subsingleton.elim i y]
end
@[simp] lemma update_row_subsingleton [subsingleton m] (A : matrix m n R)
(i : m) (b : n → R) :
A.update_row i b = (row b).submatrix (function.const m ()) id :=
begin
ext x y,
simp [update_column_apply, subsingleton.elim i x]
end
lemma map_update_row [decidable_eq m] (f : α → β) :
map (update_row M i b) f = update_row (M.map f) i (f ∘ b) :=
begin
ext i' j',
rw [update_row_apply, map_apply, map_apply, update_row_apply],
exact apply_ite f _ _ _,
end
lemma map_update_column [decidable_eq n] (f : α → β) :
map (update_column M j c) f = update_column (M.map f) j (f ∘ c) :=
begin
ext i' j',
rw [update_column_apply, map_apply, map_apply, update_column_apply],
exact apply_ite f _ _ _,
end
lemma update_row_transpose [decidable_eq n] : update_row Mᵀ j c = (update_column M j c)ᵀ :=
begin
ext i' j,
rw [transpose_apply, update_row_apply, update_column_apply],
refl
end
lemma update_column_transpose [decidable_eq m] : update_column Mᵀ i b = (update_row M i b)ᵀ :=
begin
ext i' j,
rw [transpose_apply, update_row_apply, update_column_apply],
refl
end
lemma update_row_conj_transpose [decidable_eq n] [has_star α] :
update_row Mᴴ j (star c) = (update_column M j c)ᴴ :=
begin
rw [conj_transpose, conj_transpose, transpose_map, transpose_map, update_row_transpose,
map_update_column],
refl,
end
lemma update_column_conj_transpose [decidable_eq m] [has_star α] :
update_column Mᴴ i (star b) = (update_row M i b)ᴴ :=
begin
rw [conj_transpose, conj_transpose, transpose_map, transpose_map, update_column_transpose,
map_update_row],
refl,
end
@[simp] lemma update_row_eq_self [decidable_eq m]
(A : matrix m n α) (i : m) :
A.update_row i (A i) = A :=
function.update_eq_self i A
@[simp] lemma update_column_eq_self [decidable_eq n]
(A : matrix m n α) (i : n) :
A.update_column i (λ j, A j i) = A :=
funext $ λ j, function.update_eq_self i (A j)
lemma diagonal_update_column_single [decidable_eq n] [has_zero α] (v : n → α) (i : n) (x : α):
(diagonal v).update_column i (pi.single i x) = diagonal (function.update v i x) :=
begin
ext j k,
obtain rfl | hjk := eq_or_ne j k,
{ rw [diagonal_apply_eq],
obtain rfl | hji := eq_or_ne j i,
{ rw [update_column_self, pi.single_eq_same, function.update_same], },
{ rw [update_column_ne hji, diagonal_apply_eq, function.update_noteq hji], } },
{ rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hjk],
obtain rfl | hki := eq_or_ne k i,
{ rw [update_column_self, pi.single_eq_of_ne hjk] },
{ rw [update_column_ne hki, diagonal_apply_ne _ hjk] } }
end
lemma diagonal_update_row_single [decidable_eq n] [has_zero α] (v : n → α) (i : n) (x : α):
(diagonal v).update_row i (pi.single i x) = diagonal (function.update v i x) :=
by rw [←diagonal_transpose, update_row_transpose, diagonal_update_column_single, diagonal_transpose]
end update
end matrix
namespace ring_hom
variables [fintype n] [non_assoc_semiring α] [non_assoc_semiring β]
lemma map_matrix_mul (M : matrix m n α) (N : matrix n o α) (i : m) (j : o) (f : α →+* β) :
f (matrix.mul M N i j) = matrix.mul (M.map f) (N.map f) i j :=
by simp [matrix.mul_apply, ring_hom.map_sum]
lemma map_dot_product [non_assoc_semiring R] [non_assoc_semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (v w : n → R) :
f (v ⬝ᵥ w) = (f ∘ v) ⬝ᵥ (f ∘ w) :=
by simp only [matrix.dot_product, f.map_sum, f.map_mul]
lemma map_vec_mul [non_assoc_semiring R] [non_assoc_semiring S]
(f : R →+* S) (M : matrix n m R) (v : n → R) (i : m) :
f (M.vec_mul v i) = ((M.map f).vec_mul (f ∘ v) i) :=
by simp only [matrix.vec_mul, matrix.map_apply, ring_hom.map_dot_product]
lemma map_mul_vec [non_assoc_semiring R] [non_assoc_semiring S]
(f : R →+* S) (M : matrix m n R) (v : n → R) (i : m) :
f (M.mul_vec v i) = ((M.map f).mul_vec (f ∘ v) i) :=
by simp only [matrix.mul_vec, matrix.map_apply, ring_hom.map_dot_product]
end ring_hom
|
e4e5bcaff289e3e67ba98af266d0547894807346 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/antiquotRecovery.lean | a1be49161a849b8aadc06bba85d6290b0a11299c | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 184 | lean | syntax "foo " (" bar " ident)? : tactic
macro_rules
-- should not complain about `$id` not being a valid command and create a snapshot for it
| `(tactic| foo $[bar $id]) => sorry
|
2f138c16ff71b9362a53e475c90ef06b5122c656 | 42610cc2e5db9c90269470365e6056df0122eaa0 | /library/theories/finite_group_theory/newpgroup.lean | faa44ffd7c130aa69d6118c52729d9726a40f06a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tomsib2001/lean | 2ab59bfaebd24a62109f800dcf4a7139ebd73858 | eb639a7d53fb40175bea5c8da86b51d14bb91f76 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,128,387,740 | 1,468,968,950,000 | 1,468,968,950,000 | 61,027,234 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,465,813,585,000 | 1,465,813,585,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,596 | lean | import algebra.group theories.finite_group_theory.subgroup theories.finite_group_theory.finsubg
theories.finite_group_theory.cyclic theories.finite_group_theory.perm
theories.finite_group_theory.action
import theories.finite_group_theory.extra_action theories.finite_group_theory.quotient theories.finite_group_theory.extra_finsubg data.finset.extra_finset
import theories.number_theory.pinat
import theories.finite_group_theory.pgroup
open nat finset fintype group_theory subtype
namespace group_theory
-- useful for debugging
set_option formatter.hide_full_terms false
definition pred_p [reducible] (p : nat) : nat → Prop := λ n, n = p
variables {G : Type} [ambientG : group G] [finG : fintype G] [deceqG : decidable_eq G]
include ambientG deceqG finG
section pgroup_missing
-- the Cauchy theorem from pgroup only mentions the ambient group..
lemma actual_Cauchy_theorem (H : finset G) [HsgH : is_finsubg H] {p : nat} :
prime p → p ∣ card H → ∃ h : G, h ∈ H ∧ order h = p := sorry
end pgroup_missing
section PgroupDefs
parameter pi : ℕ → Prop
variable [Hdecpi : ∀ p, decidable (pi p)]
definition pgroup [reducible] (H : finset G) := is_pi_nat pi (card H)
definition pi_subgroup [reducible] (H1 H2 : finset G) := subset H1 H2 ∧ pgroup H1
definition pi_elt (pi : ℕ → Prop) (x : G) : Prop := is_pi_nat pi (order x)
definition Hall [reducible] (A B : finset G) :=
subset A B ∧ coprime (card A) (index A B)
definition pHall [reducible] (A B : finset G) :=
subset A B ∧ pgroup A ∧ is_pi'_nat pi (index A B)
-- decidability on prgroup theory
include Hdecpi
definition pgroup_dec [instance] (H : finset G) : decidable (pgroup H) := _
definition decidable_pigroup [instance] (H : finset G) : decidable (pgroup H) :=
begin
apply decidable_pi
end
definition decidable_pi_subgroup [instance] (H1 H2 : finset G) : decidable (pi_subgroup H1 H2) := _
-- end decidability on prgroup theory
-- some useful lemmas
lemma pi_subgroup_subset {H1 H2 : finset G} (Hpisubg : pi_subgroup H1 H2) : subset H1 H2 :=
and.left Hpisubg
lemma pi_subgroup_pgroup {H1 H2 : finset G} (Hpisubg : pi_subgroup H1 H2) : pgroup H1 :=
and.right Hpisubg
end PgroupDefs
section Sylows
-- the set of p-Sylows of a subset A
-- this definition is not the one we want to manipulate in the Sylow theorem,
-- because it is more convenient to have G act on the set of maximal p-subgroups
-- until we prove that those are the two same things
definition Syl [reducible] (p : nat) (A : finset G) :=
{ S ∈ finset.powerset A | is_finsubg_prop G S ∧ pHall (pred_p p) S A }
-- Definition Sylow A B := p_group B && Hall A B.
definition is_sylow p (A B : finset G) := pgroup (pred_p p) A ∧ Hall A B ∧ is_finsubg_prop G A
definition is_in_Syl [class] (p : nat) (A S : finset G) := S ∈ Syl p A
end Sylows
lemma pi_subgroup_trans {pi} {H1 H2 H3 : finset G} : pi_subgroup pi H1 H2 → subset H2 H3 → pi_subgroup pi H1 H3 :=
assume Hpi12 Hs23,
and.intro
(subset.trans (and.left Hpi12) Hs23)
(and.right Hpi12)
lemma pi_subgroup_sub {pi} {H1 H2 H3 : finset G} : pi_subgroup pi H1 H3 → subset H1 H2 → subset H2 H3 → pi_subgroup pi H1 H2 :=
assume Hpi1 s12 s23,
and.intro
s12
(and.right Hpi1)
lemma pgroup_card (p : nat) (H : finset G) : pgroup (pred_p p) H → exists n, card H = p^n :=
assume Hpgroup,
sorry
lemma Hall_of_pHall (pi : ℕ → Prop) [Hdecpi : ∀ p, decidable (pi p)] (A B : finset G) : pHall pi A B → Hall A B :=
assume HpHall : pHall pi A B,
(and.intro (and.left HpHall)
(
have H_pi_A : is_pi_nat pi (card A), from and.left (and.right HpHall),
have H_pi'_indAB : is_pi'_nat pi (index A B), from and.right (and.right HpHall),
coprime_pi_pi' H_pi_A H_pi'_indAB
))
lemma equiv_Syl_is_Syl p (S A : finset G) : S ∈ Syl p A ↔ is_sylow p S A :=
iff.intro
(assume Hmem,
have HS : is_finsubg_prop G S ∧ pHall (pred_p p) S A, from of_mem_sep Hmem,
and.intro
(and.left (and.right(and.right HS)))
(and.intro
(Hall_of_pHall (pred_p p) S A (and.right HS))
(and.left HS)
)
)
(assume H_syl,
have H1 : is_pi_nat (pred_p p) (card S), from and.left H_syl,
have H2 :(subset S A ∧ coprime (finset.card S) (index S A)), from (and.left (and.right H_syl)),
have H3 : is_finsubg_prop G S, from and.right (and.right H_syl),
mem_sep_of_mem
(mem_powerset_of_subset (and.left H2))
(
have Hsub : subset S A, from and.left H2,
have Hpgroup : pgroup (pred_p p) S, from H1,
have Hpi' : is_pi'_nat (pred_p p) (index S A), from pi_pi'_coprime H1 (and.right H2),
and.intro H3 (and.intro Hsub (and.intro Hpgroup Hpi')))
)
definition sylow_finsubg_prop [instance] (p : nat) (A : finset G) (S : finset G) [HSyl : is_in_Syl p A S] : is_finsubg_prop G S :=
and.left (of_mem_sep HSyl)
definition sylow_is_finsubg [instance] (p : nat) (A S : finset G) [HSyl : is_in_Syl p A S] : is_finsubg S
:= is_finsubg_is_finsubg_prop (sylow_finsubg_prop p A S)
-- probably a bit soon to show this..
lemma syl_is_max_pgroup (p : nat) (A S : finset G) : is_in_Syl p A S ↔ maxSet (λ B, pgroup (pred_p p) B) S :=
iff.intro
(assume HSyl,
iff.elim_right (maxSet_iff -- (λ B, pgroup (pred_p p) B) S
)
(take B HSB,
iff.intro
(sorry)
(sorry)))
(sorry)
example (p : nat) (A S : finset G) (H : is_in_Syl p A S)
: is_finsubg S := _ -- @sylow_is_finsubg G _ _ _ p A S H --(sylow_is_finsubg _)
-- only true if they actually are groups
lemma pgroupS {pi : ℕ → Prop} {H1 H2 : finset G} [H1gr : is_finsubg H1] [ H2gr : is_finsubg H2] :
subset H1 H2 → pgroup pi H2 → pgroup pi H1 :=
assume HS HpiH2,
pinat_dvd (lagrange_div HS) HpiH2
lemma pisubgroupS {pi : ℕ → Prop} (H2 : finset G) {H1 H3 : finset G}
[H1gr : is_finsubg H1] [ H2gr : is_finsubg H2] (HS : subset H1 H2) :
pi_subgroup pi H2 H3 → pi_subgroup pi H1 H3 :=
assume Hpi23,
and.intro
(subset.trans HS (and.left Hpi23))
(pgroupS HS (and.right Hpi23))
-- TODO: there is probably a one-liner proof of this one somewhere, look for it
lemma inj_fin_lcoset_one -- (B : finset G)
: function.injective (fin_lcoset '{(1:G)}) :=
take (x : G) (a : G),
assume Hxa,
have H1 : ∀ (x : G), fin_lcoset (insert (1 : G) empty) x = image (lmul_by x) (insert 1 empty), from take (x : G), rfl,
have H2 : ∀ (x : G), image (lmul_by x) (insert (1 : G) empty) = insert (lmul_by x (1:G)) empty , from take x, begin
apply image_singleton
end,
have H : ∀ (x : G), fin_lcoset (insert (1 : G) empty) x = insert (lmul_by x 1) empty, from take x,
calc
fin_lcoset (insert (1 : G) empty) x = image (lmul_by x) (insert 1 empty) : {H1 x}
... = insert (lmul_by x 1) empty : {H2 x},
have Hx : fin_lcoset (insert (1 : G) empty) x = insert (lmul_by x 1) empty, from (H x),
have Ha : fin_lcoset (insert (1 : G) empty) a = insert (lmul_by a 1) empty, from (H a),
have showdown : insert (lmul_by x 1) empty = insert (lmul_by a 1) empty, from eq.subst Hx (eq.subst Ha Hxa),
insert_empty x a (eq.subst (lmul_one_id x) (eq.subst (lmul_one_id a) showdown))
lemma Hall1 (A : finset G) [h_A_gr : is_finsubg A] : Hall '{(1:G)} A :=
and.intro (subset_one_group A h_A_gr)
begin
rewrite (index_one A),
rewrite card1,
exact (gcd_one_left (finset.card A))
end
lemma p_group1 (p : nat) : pgroup (pred_p p) '{(1:G)} :=
and.intro
begin
rewrite card1,
apply nat.le_refl
end
(take p Hp,
absurd Hp (not_mem_empty p)
)
-- lemma sylow1 p (B : finset G): is_sylow p '{(1:G)} B := _
section SylowTheorem
end SylowTheorem
end group_theory
|
2cae0b4fac62355992718adae9ac16bf077bc431 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/keyAttrErase.lean | b6862ddcc369d855d669100a52e6ab75f0418c84 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 124 | lean | theorem ex {i j : Fin n} (h : i = j) : i.val = j.val :=
h ▸ rfl
attribute [-app_unexpander] unexpandEqNDRec
#print ex
|
ba89f345e53d9458f55218233293b14b519deeb3 | 36c7a18fd72e5b57229bd8ba36493daf536a19ce | /tests/lean/run/blast_cc2.lean | a97880c60d72cc982f3741c809ab970b61661010 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | YHVHvx/lean | 732bf0fb7a298cd7fe0f15d82f8e248c11db49e9 | 038369533e0136dd395dc252084d3c1853accbf2 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,701,080,210 | 1,449,128,595,000 | 1,449,128,595,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 632 | lean | set_option blast.init_depth 10
set_option blast.inc_depth 100
set_option blast.subst false
example (a b c d : nat) : a == b → b = c → c == d → a == d :=
by blast
example (a b c d : nat) : a = b → b = c → c == d → a == d :=
by blast
example (a b c d : nat) : a = b → b == c → c == d → a == d :=
by blast
example (a b c d : nat) : a == b → b == c → c = d → a == d :=
by blast
example (a b c d : nat) : a == b → b = c → c = d → a == d :=
by blast
example (a b c d : nat) : a = b → b = c → c = d → a == d :=
by blast
example (a b c d : nat) : a = b → b == c → c = d → a == d :=
by blast
|
101939394e33afdd81f4436c8c1436fb60542b65 | 432d948a4d3d242fdfb44b81c9e1b1baacd58617 | /src/category_theory/subobject/factor_thru.lean | 19cdeee54b727bb6ce744945768bc4b80a77a5fa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | JLimperg/aesop3 | 306cc6570c556568897ed2e508c8869667252e8a | a4a116f650cc7403428e72bd2e2c4cda300fe03f | refs/heads/master | 1,682,884,916,368 | 1,620,320,033,000 | 1,620,320,033,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,838 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.subobject.basic
/-!
# Factoring through subobjects
The predicate `h : P.factors f`, for `P : subobject Y` and `f : X ⟶ Y`
asserts the existence of some `P.factor_thru f : X ⟶ (P : C)` making the obvious diagram commute.
-/
universes v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable theory
open category_theory category_theory.category category_theory.limits
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C] {X Y Z : C}
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
namespace category_theory
namespace mono_over
/-- When `f : X ⟶ Y` and `P : mono_over Y`,
`P.factors f` expresses that there exists a factorisation of `f` through `P`.
Given `h : P.factors f`, you can recover the morphism as `P.factor_thru f h`.
-/
def factors {X Y : C} (P : mono_over Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop := ∃ g : X ⟶ P.val.left, g ≫ P.arrow = f
lemma factors_congr {X : C} {f g : mono_over X} {Y : C} (h : Y ⟶ X) (e : f ≅ g) :
f.factors h ↔ g.factors h :=
⟨λ ⟨u, hu⟩, ⟨u ≫ (((mono_over.forget _).map e.hom)).left, by simp [hu]⟩,
λ ⟨u, hu⟩, ⟨u ≫ (((mono_over.forget _).map e.inv)).left, by simp [hu]⟩⟩
/-- `P.factor_thru f h` provides a factorisation of `f : X ⟶ Y` through some `P : mono_over Y`,
given the evidence `h : P.factors f` that such a factorisation exists. -/
def factor_thru {X Y : C} (P : mono_over Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : factors P f) : X ⟶ P.val.left :=
classical.some h
end mono_over
namespace subobject
/-- When `f : X ⟶ Y` and `P : subobject Y`,
`P.factors f` expresses that there exists a factorisation of `f` through `P`.
Given `h : P.factors f`, you can recover the morphism as `P.factor_thru f h`.
-/
def factors {X Y : C} (P : subobject Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
quotient.lift_on' P (λ P, P.factors f)
begin
rintros P Q ⟨h⟩,
apply propext,
split,
{ rintro ⟨i, w⟩,
exact ⟨i ≫ h.hom.left, by erw [category.assoc, over.w h.hom, w]⟩, },
{ rintro ⟨i, w⟩,
exact ⟨i ≫ h.inv.left, by erw [category.assoc, over.w h.inv, w]⟩, },
end
@[simp] lemma mk_factors_iff {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [mono f] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
(subobject.mk f).factors g ↔ (mono_over.mk' f).factors g :=
iff.rfl
lemma factors_iff {X Y : C} (P : subobject Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
P.factors f ↔ (representative.obj P).factors f :=
quot.induction_on P $ λ a, mono_over.factors_congr _ (representative_iso _).symm
lemma factors_self {X : C} (P : subobject X) : P.factors P.arrow :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨𝟙 P, (by simp)⟩
lemma factors_comp_arrow {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (f : X ⟶ P) : P.factors (f ≫ P.arrow) :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨f, rfl⟩
lemma factors_of_factors_right {X Y Z : C} {P : subobject Z} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g : Y ⟶ Z}
(h : P.factors g) : P.factors (f ≫ g) :=
begin
revert P,
refine quotient.ind' _,
intro P,
rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨f ≫ g, by simp⟩,
end
lemma factors_zero [has_zero_morphisms C] {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} :
P.factors (0 : X ⟶ Y) :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma factors_of_le {Y Z : C} {P Q : subobject Y} (f : Z ⟶ Y) (h : P ≤ Q) :
P.factors f → Q.factors f :=
by { simp only [factors_iff], exact λ ⟨u, hu⟩, ⟨u ≫ of_le _ _ h, by simp [←hu]⟩ }
/-- `P.factor_thru f h` provides a factorisation of `f : X ⟶ Y` through some `P : subobject Y`,
given the evidence `h : P.factors f` that such a factorisation exists. -/
def factor_thru {X Y : C} (P : subobject Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : factors P f) : X ⟶ P :=
classical.some ((factors_iff _ _).mp h)
@[simp, reassoc] lemma factor_thru_arrow {X Y : C} (P : subobject Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : factors P f) :
P.factor_thru f h ≫ P.arrow = f :=
classical.some_spec ((factors_iff _ _).mp h)
@[simp] lemma factor_thru_self {X : C} (P : subobject X) (h) :
P.factor_thru P.arrow h = 𝟙 P :=
by { ext, simp, }
@[simp] lemma factor_thru_comp_arrow {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (f : X ⟶ P) (h) :
P.factor_thru (f ≫ P.arrow) h = f :=
by { ext, simp, }
@[simp] lemma factor_thru_eq_zero [has_zero_morphisms C]
{X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} {f : X ⟶ Y} {h : factors P f} :
P.factor_thru f h = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
begin
fsplit,
{ intro w,
replace w := w =≫ P.arrow,
simpa using w, },
{ rintro rfl,
ext, simp, },
end
@[simp]
lemma factor_thru_right {X Y Z : C} {P : subobject Z} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : P.factors g) :
f ≫ P.factor_thru g h = P.factor_thru (f ≫ g) (factors_of_factors_right f h) :=
begin
apply (cancel_mono P.arrow).mp,
simp,
end
@[simp]
lemma factor_thru_zero
[has_zero_morphisms C] {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (h : P.factors (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :
P.factor_thru 0 h = 0 :=
by simp
-- `h` is an explicit argument here so we can use
-- `rw ←factor_thru_le h`, obtaining a subgoal `P.factors f`.
@[simp]
lemma factor_thru_comp_of_le
{Y Z : C} {P Q : subobject Y} {f : Z ⟶ Y} (h : P ≤ Q) (w : P.factors f) :
P.factor_thru f w ≫ of_le P Q h = Q.factor_thru f (factors_of_le f h w) :=
by { ext, simp, }
section preadditive
variables [preadditive C]
lemma factors_add {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (wf : P.factors f) (wg : P.factors g) :
P.factors (f + g) :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨P.factor_thru f wf + P.factor_thru g wg, by simp⟩
-- This can't be a `simp` lemma as `wf` and `wg` may not exist.
-- However you can `rw` by it to assert that `f` and `g` factor through `P` separately.
lemma factor_thru_add {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : P.factors (f + g)) (wf : P.factors f) (wg : P.factors g) :
P.factor_thru (f + g) w = P.factor_thru f wf + P.factor_thru g wg :=
by { ext, simp, }
lemma factors_left_of_factors_add {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : P.factors (f + g)) (wg : P.factors g) : P.factors f :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨P.factor_thru (f + g) w - P.factor_thru g wg, by simp⟩
@[simp]
lemma factor_thru_add_sub_factor_thru_right {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : P.factors (f + g)) (wg : P.factors g) :
P.factor_thru (f + g) w - P.factor_thru g wg =
P.factor_thru f (factors_left_of_factors_add f g w wg) :=
by { ext, simp, }
lemma factors_right_of_factors_add {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : P.factors (f + g)) (wf : P.factors f) : P.factors g :=
(factors_iff _ _).mpr ⟨P.factor_thru (f + g) w - P.factor_thru f wf, by simp⟩
@[simp]
lemma factor_thru_add_sub_factor_thru_left {X Y : C} {P : subobject Y} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : P.factors (f + g)) (wf : P.factors f) :
P.factor_thru (f + g) w - P.factor_thru f wf =
P.factor_thru g (factors_right_of_factors_add f g w wf) :=
by { ext, simp, }
end preadditive
end subobject
end category_theory
|
d25acb21032493e83c35f2771bf3ffe4c17619ec | 47181b4ef986292573c77e09fcb116584d37ea8a | /src/for_mathlib/valuations.lean | 386073f92d7892f85e928754800ab7712e697afa | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | RaitoBezarius/berkovich-spaces | 87662a2bdb0ac0beed26e3338b221e3f12107b78 | 0a49f75a599bcb20333ec86b301f84411f04f7cf | refs/heads/main | 1,690,520,666,912 | 1,629,328,012,000 | 1,629,328,012,000 | 332,238,095 | 4 | 0 | MIT | 1,629,312,085,000 | 1,611,414,506,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 559 | lean | import data.real.basic
import data.real.cau_seq
import .nat_digits
import .list
lemma list.abv_sum_le_sum_abv
{α β} [ring α] [linear_ordered_field β]
(abv: α → β)
[habv: is_absolute_value abv]
(L: list α): abv (L.sum) ≤ (L.map abv).sum :=
begin
induction L with hd tl hl,
{ simp [list.map, is_absolute_value.abv_zero abv] },
{ simp [list.map],
exact calc abv (hd + tl.sum) ≤ abv hd + abv tl.sum : is_absolute_value.abv_add abv hd tl.sum
... ≤ abv hd + (list.map abv tl).sum : add_le_add_left hl _,
}
end |
4f3379fd3fc3a63d9138fc4d042bb7bfd0948d7c | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/tactic7.lean | 4f96b4995397e6051fedd00cd69ee987084c4798 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 334 | lean | import logic
open tactic
theorem tst {A B : Prop} (H1 : A) (H2 : B) : A ∧ B ∧ A
:= by apply and.intro; state; assumption; apply and.intro; repeat assumption
check tst
theorem tst2 {A B : Prop} (H1 : A) (H2 : B) : A ∧ B ∧ A
:= by repeat ((apply @and.intro | assumption) ; trace "STEP"; state; trace "----------")
check tst2
|
55735f178296b3f8c8bfdecc1269fab7b8daf9ad | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/ofNat_class.lean | a96d3116d6313b3ef30040f8d545815a838f6e0c | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 421 | lean | import Lean
open Lean
local macro "ofNat_class" Class:ident n:num : command =>
let field := Lean.mkIdent <| Class.getId.eraseMacroScopes.getString!.toLower
`(class $Class:ident.{u} (α : Type u) where
$field:ident : α
instance {α} [$Class α] : OfNat α (nat_lit $n) where
ofNat := ‹$Class α›.1
instance {α} [OfNat α (nat_lit $n)] : $Class α where
$field:ident := $n)
ofNat_class Zero 0
|
16b259e20134dc189db11136623c45ac7204cfd7 | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /tests/lean/inaccessible.lean | d06ce29d74bbaa70ef3aef380f01b41d414874cb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,394 | lean | universe variables u v
inductive imf {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : B → Type (max 1 u v)
| mk : ∀ (a : A), imf (f a)
definition inv_1 {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : ∀ (b : B), imf f b → A
| .(f a) (imf.mk .(f) a) := a
definition inv_2 {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : ∀ (b : B), imf f b → A
| ._ (imf.mk ._ a) := a
definition mk {A : Type u} {B : Type v} {f : A → B} (a : A) := imf.mk f a
definition inv_3 {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : ∀ (b : B), imf f b → A
| .(f a) (mk a) := a -- Error, mk is not a constructor
definition inv_4 {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : ∀ (b : B), imf f b → A
| .(f a) (.(mk) a) := a -- Error, we cannot use inaccessible annotation around functions in applications
attribute [pattern] mk
definition inv_5 {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : ∀ (b : B), imf f b → A
| .(f a) (mk a) := a
definition inv_6 {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : ∀ (b : B), imf f b → A
| (f a) (mk a) := a -- Error, 'a' is being "declared" twice in the pattern
definition inv_7 {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (f : A → B) : ∀ (b : B), imf f b → A
| (f a) (mk b) := a -- Typing error, it would also fail when compiling the pattern
definition g_1 : nat → nat → nat
| a a := a -- Error, 'a' is being "declared" twice
definition g_2 (a : nat) : nat → nat → nat
| a b := a
example (a b c : nat) : g_2 a b c = b :=
rfl
inductive vec1 (A : Type u) : nat → Type (max 1 u)
| nil : vec1 0
| cons : ∀ n, A → vec1 n → vec1 (n+1)
section
open vec1
definition map_1 {A : Type u} (f : A → A → A) : Π {n}, vec1 A n → vec1 A n → vec1 A n
| 0 (nil .(A)) (nil .(A)) := nil A
| (n+1) (cons .(n) h₁ v₁) (cons .(n) h₂ v₂) := cons n (f h₁ h₂) (map_1 v₁ v₂)
definition map_2 {A : Type u} (f : A → A → A) : Π {n}, vec1 A n → vec1 A n → vec1 A n
| 0 (nil ._) (nil ._) := nil A
| (n+1) (cons ._ h₁ v₁) (cons ._ h₂ v₂) := cons n (f h₁ h₂) (map_2 v₁ v₂)
/- In map_3, we use the inaccessible terms to avoid pattern/matching on the first argument -/
definition map_3 {A : Type u} (f : A → A → A) : Π {n}, vec1 A n → vec1 A n → vec1 A n
| ._ (nil ._) (nil ._) := nil A
| ._ (cons n h₁ v₁) (cons .(n) h₂ v₂) := cons n (f h₁ h₂) (map_3 v₁ v₂)
end
inductive vec2 (A : Type u) : nat → Type (max 1 u)
| nil {} : vec2 0
| cons : ∀ {n}, A → vec2 n → vec2 (n+1)
section
open vec2
definition map_4 {A : Type u} (f : A → A → A) : Π {n}, vec2 A n → vec2 A n → vec2 A n
| 0 nil nil := nil
| (n+1) (cons h₁ v₁) (cons h₂ v₂) := cons (f h₁ h₂) (map_4 v₁ v₂)
definition map_5 {A : Type u} (f : A → A → A) : Π {n}, vec2 A n → vec2 A n → vec2 A n
| ._ nil nil := nil
| ._ (@cons ._ n h₁ v₁) (cons h₂ v₂) := cons (f h₁ h₂) (map_5 v₁ v₂)
/-
The following variant will be rejected by the new equation compiler.
In Lean2, the second equation is accepted because unassigned metavariables
occurring in patterns become new variables. This feature is too hackish.
-/
definition map_6 {A : Type u} (f : A → A → A) : Π {n}, vec2 A n → vec2 A n → vec2 A n
| ._ nil nil := nil
| ._ (cons h₁ v₁) (cons h₂ v₂) := cons (f h₁ h₂) (map_6 v₁ v₂)
end
|
18f6a0b1a49268e8c48a44f779f168565d44222c | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/run/noncomputable_meta.lean | c2435fe503820618d5b744073f385dc208789a51 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 91 | lean | constants (X : Type) (x y : X)
noncomputable meta def foo : bool -> X
| tt := x
| ff := y
|
06f049dfeed7b27e39636e106eeb5b8fb51a5b2f | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/interactive/info1.lean | 6d6510ad3d933760d520446318a93af612f45e39 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 147 | lean | def foo.f : nat → nat := λ x, x
def bla.f : string → string := λ x, x
open foo bla
example : nat := f 0
--^ "command": "info"
|
770888b9b0af4e112f18d4064403adeac5eb93b5 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/data/list/perm.lean | 4c4e06678b360189ab1f454beb2e4fdaf7b37d22 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 54,143 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.list.erase_dup
import data.list.lattice
import data.list.permutation
import data.list.zip
import logic.relation
/-!
# List Permutations
This file introduces the `list.perm` relation, which is true if two lists are permutations of one
another.
## Notation
The notation `~` is used for permutation equivalence.
-/
open_locale nat
universes uu vv
namespace list
variables {α : Type uu} {β : Type vv}
/-- `perm l₁ l₂` or `l₁ ~ l₂` asserts that `l₁` and `l₂` are permutations
of each other. This is defined by induction using pairwise swaps. -/
inductive perm : list α → list α → Prop
| nil : perm [] []
| cons : Π (x : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α}, perm l₁ l₂ → perm (x::l₁) (x::l₂)
| swap : Π (x y : α) (l : list α), perm (y::x::l) (x::y::l)
| trans : Π {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, perm l₁ l₂ → perm l₂ l₃ → perm l₁ l₃
open perm (swap)
infix ` ~ `:50 := perm
@[refl] protected theorem perm.refl : ∀ (l : list α), l ~ l
| [] := perm.nil
| (x::xs) := (perm.refl xs).cons x
@[symm] protected theorem perm.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₂ ~ l₁ :=
perm.rec_on p
perm.nil
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, r₁.cons x)
(λ x y l, swap y x l)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, r₂.trans r₁)
theorem perm_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ l₂ ~ l₁ := ⟨perm.symm, perm.symm⟩
theorem perm.swap'
(x y : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : y::x::l₁ ~ x::y::l₂ :=
(swap _ _ _).trans ((p.cons _).cons _)
attribute [trans] perm.trans
theorem perm.eqv (α) : equivalence (@perm α) :=
mk_equivalence (@perm α) (@perm.refl α) (@perm.symm α) (@perm.trans α)
instance is_setoid (α) : setoid (list α) :=
setoid.mk (@perm α) (perm.eqv α)
theorem perm.subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, perm.rec_on p
(λ h, h)
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁ i, or.elim i
(λ ax, by simp [ax])
(λ al₁, or.inr (r₁ al₁)))
(λ x y l ayxl, or.elim ayxl
(λ ay, by simp [ay])
(λ axl, or.elim axl
(λ ax, by simp [ax])
(λ al, or.inr (or.inr al))))
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ ainl₁, r₂ (r₁ ainl₁))
theorem perm.mem_iff {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂ :=
iff.intro (λ m, h.subset m) (λ m, h.symm.subset m)
theorem perm.append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t₁ : list α) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁++t₁ ~ l₂++t₁ :=
perm.rec_on p
(perm.refl ([] ++ t₁))
(λ x l₁ l₂ p₁ r₁, r₁.cons x)
(λ x y l, swap x y _)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, r₁.trans r₂)
theorem perm.append_left {t₁ t₂ : list α} : ∀ (l : list α), t₁ ~ t₂ → l++t₁ ~ l++t₂
| [] p := p
| (x::xs) p := (perm.append_left xs p).cons x
theorem perm.append {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : l₁++t₁ ~ l₂++t₂ :=
(p₁.append_right t₁).trans (p₂.append_left l₂)
theorem perm.append_cons (a : α) {h₁ h₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}
(p₁ : h₁ ~ h₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : h₁ ++ a::t₁ ~ h₂ ++ a::t₂ :=
p₁.append (p₂.cons a)
@[simp] theorem perm_middle {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁++a::l₂ ~ a::(l₁++l₂)
| [] l₂ := perm.refl _
| (b::l₁) l₂ := ((@perm_middle l₁ l₂).cons _).trans (swap a b _)
@[simp] theorem perm_append_singleton (a : α) (l : list α) : l ++ [a] ~ a::l :=
perm_middle.trans $ by rw [append_nil]
theorem perm_append_comm : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (l₁++l₂) ~ (l₂++l₁)
| [] l₂ := by simp
| (a::t) l₂ := (perm_append_comm.cons _).trans perm_middle.symm
theorem concat_perm (l : list α) (a : α) : concat l a ~ a :: l :=
by simp
theorem perm.length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : length l₁ = length l₂ :=
perm.rec_on p
rfl
(λ x l₁ l₂ p r, by simp[r])
(λ x y l, by simp)
(λ l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂, eq.trans r₁ r₂)
theorem perm.eq_nil {l : list α} (p : l ~ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero p.length_eq
theorem perm.nil_eq {l : list α} (p : [] ~ l) : [] = l :=
p.symm.eq_nil.symm
@[simp]
theorem perm_nil {l₁ : list α} : l₁ ~ [] ↔ l₁ = [] :=
⟨λ p, p.eq_nil, λ e, e ▸ perm.refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem nil_perm {l₁ : list α} : [] ~ l₁ ↔ l₁ = [] :=
perm_comm.trans perm_nil
theorem not_perm_nil_cons (x : α) (l : list α) : ¬ [] ~ x::l
| p := by injection p.symm.eq_nil
@[simp] theorem reverse_perm : ∀ (l : list α), reverse l ~ l
| [] := perm.nil
| (a::l) := by { rw reverse_cons,
exact (perm_append_singleton _ _).trans ((reverse_perm l).cons a) }
theorem perm_cons_append_cons {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (p : l ~ l₁++l₂) :
a::l ~ l₁++(a::l₂) :=
(p.cons a).trans perm_middle.symm
@[simp] theorem perm_repeat {a : α} {n : ℕ} {l : list α} : l ~ repeat a n ↔ l = repeat a n :=
⟨λ p, (eq_repeat.2
⟨p.length_eq.trans $ length_repeat _ _,
λ b m, eq_of_mem_repeat $ p.subset m⟩),
λ h, h ▸ perm.refl _⟩
@[simp] theorem repeat_perm {a : α} {n : ℕ} {l : list α} : repeat a n ~ l ↔ repeat a n = l :=
(perm_comm.trans perm_repeat).trans eq_comm
@[simp] theorem perm_singleton {a : α} {l : list α} : l ~ [a] ↔ l = [a] :=
@perm_repeat α a 1 l
@[simp] theorem singleton_perm {a : α} {l : list α} : [a] ~ l ↔ [a] = l :=
@repeat_perm α a 1 l
theorem perm.eq_singleton {a : α} {l : list α} (p : l ~ [a]) : l = [a] :=
perm_singleton.1 p
theorem perm.singleton_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (p : [a] ~ l) : [a] = l :=
p.symm.eq_singleton.symm
theorem singleton_perm_singleton {a b : α} : [a] ~ [b] ↔ a = b :=
by simp
theorem perm_cons_erase [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l ~ a :: l.erase a :=
let ⟨l₁, l₂, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_erase_eq h in
e₂.symm ▸ e₁.symm ▸ perm_middle
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem perm_induction_on
{P : list α → list α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂)
(h₁ : P [] [])
(h₂ : ∀ x l₁ l₂, l₁ ~ l₂ → P l₁ l₂ → P (x::l₁) (x::l₂))
(h₃ : ∀ x y l₁ l₂, l₁ ~ l₂ → P l₁ l₂ → P (y::x::l₁) (x::y::l₂))
(h₄ : ∀ l₁ l₂ l₃, l₁ ~ l₂ → l₂ ~ l₃ → P l₁ l₂ → P l₂ l₃ → P l₁ l₃) :
P l₁ l₂ :=
have P_refl : ∀ l, P l l, from
assume l,
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ x xs ih, h₂ x xs xs (perm.refl xs) ih),
perm.rec_on p h₁ h₂ (λ x y l, h₃ x y l l (perm.refl l) (P_refl l)) h₄
@[congr] theorem perm.filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
filter_map f l₁ ~ filter_map f l₂ :=
begin
induction p with x l₂ l₂' p IH x y l₂ l₂ m₂ r₂ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂,
{ simp },
{ simp only [filter_map], cases f x with a; simp [filter_map, IH, perm.cons] },
{ simp only [filter_map], cases f x with a; cases f y with b; simp [filter_map, swap] },
{ exact IH₁.trans IH₂ }
end
@[congr] theorem perm.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
map f l₁ ~ map f l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_map f ▸ p.filter_map _
theorem perm.pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) {H₁ H₂} : pmap f l₁ H₁ ~ pmap f l₂ H₂ :=
begin
induction p with x l₂ l₂' p IH x y l₂ l₂ m₂ r₂ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂,
{ simp },
{ simp [IH, perm.cons] },
{ simp [swap] },
{ refine IH₁.trans IH₂,
exact λ a m, H₂ a (p₂.subset m) }
end
theorem perm.filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ ~ l₂) : filter p l₁ ~ filter p l₂ :=
by rw ← filter_map_eq_filter; apply s.filter_map _
theorem exists_perm_sublist {l₁ l₂ l₂' : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) (p : l₂ ~ l₂') : ∃ l₁' ~ l₁, l₁' <+ l₂' :=
begin
induction p with x l₂ l₂' p IH x y l₂ l₂ m₂ r₂ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂ generalizing l₁ s,
{ exact ⟨[], eq_nil_of_sublist_nil s ▸ perm.refl _, nil_sublist _⟩ },
{ cases s with _ _ _ s l₁ _ _ s,
{ exact let ⟨l₁', p', s'⟩ := IH s in ⟨l₁', p', s'.cons _ _ _⟩ },
{ exact let ⟨l₁', p', s'⟩ := IH s in ⟨x::l₁', p'.cons x, s'.cons2 _ _ _⟩ } },
{ cases s with _ _ _ s l₁ _ _ s; cases s with _ _ _ s l₁ _ _ s,
{ exact ⟨l₁, perm.refl _, (s.cons _ _ _).cons _ _ _⟩ },
{ exact ⟨x::l₁, perm.refl _, (s.cons _ _ _).cons2 _ _ _⟩ },
{ exact ⟨y::l₁, perm.refl _, (s.cons2 _ _ _).cons _ _ _⟩ },
{ exact ⟨x::y::l₁, perm.swap _ _ _, (s.cons2 _ _ _).cons2 _ _ _⟩ } },
{ exact let ⟨m₁, pm, sm⟩ := IH₁ s, ⟨r₁, pr, sr⟩ := IH₂ sm in
⟨r₁, pr.trans pm, sr⟩ }
end
theorem perm.sizeof_eq_sizeof [has_sizeof α] {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.sizeof = l₂.sizeof :=
begin
induction h with hd l₁ l₂ h₁₂ h_sz₁₂ a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ h_sz₁₂ h_sz₂₃,
{ refl },
{ simp only [list.sizeof, h_sz₁₂] },
{ simp only [list.sizeof, add_left_comm] },
{ simp only [h_sz₁₂, h_sz₂₃] }
end
section rel
open relator
variables {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop}
local infixr ` ∘r ` : 80 := relation.comp
lemma perm_comp_perm : (perm ∘r perm : list α → list α → Prop) = perm :=
begin
funext a c, apply propext,
split,
{ exact assume ⟨b, hab, hba⟩, perm.trans hab hba },
{ exact assume h, ⟨a, perm.refl a, h⟩ }
end
lemma perm_comp_forall₂ {l u v} (hlu : perm l u) (huv : forall₂ r u v) : (forall₂ r ∘r perm) l v :=
begin
induction hlu generalizing v,
case perm.nil { cases huv, exact ⟨[], forall₂.nil, perm.nil⟩ },
case perm.cons : a l u hlu ih {
cases huv with _ b _ v hab huv',
rcases ih huv' with ⟨l₂, h₁₂, h₂₃⟩,
exact ⟨b::l₂, forall₂.cons hab h₁₂, h₂₃.cons _⟩ },
case perm.swap : a₁ a₂ l₁ l₂ h₂₃ {
cases h₂₃ with _ b₁ _ l₂ h₁ hr_₂₃,
cases hr_₂₃ with _ b₂ _ l₂ h₂ h₁₂,
exact ⟨b₂::b₁::l₂, forall₂.cons h₂ (forall₂.cons h₁ h₁₂), perm.swap _ _ _⟩ },
case perm.trans : la₁ la₂ la₃ _ _ ih₁ ih₂ {
rcases ih₂ huv with ⟨lb₂, hab₂, h₂₃⟩,
rcases ih₁ hab₂ with ⟨lb₁, hab₁, h₁₂⟩,
exact ⟨lb₁, hab₁, perm.trans h₁₂ h₂₃⟩ }
end
lemma forall₂_comp_perm_eq_perm_comp_forall₂ : forall₂ r ∘r perm = perm ∘r forall₂ r :=
begin
funext l₁ l₃, apply propext,
split,
{ assume h, rcases h with ⟨l₂, h₁₂, h₂₃⟩,
have : forall₂ (flip r) l₂ l₁, from h₁₂.flip ,
rcases perm_comp_forall₂ h₂₃.symm this with ⟨l', h₁, h₂⟩,
exact ⟨l', h₂.symm, h₁.flip⟩ },
{ exact assume ⟨l₂, h₁₂, h₂₃⟩, perm_comp_forall₂ h₁₂ h₂₃ }
end
lemma rel_perm_imp (hr : right_unique r) : (forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ implies) perm perm :=
assume a b h₁ c d h₂ h,
have (flip (forall₂ r) ∘r (perm ∘r forall₂ r)) b d, from ⟨a, h₁, c, h, h₂⟩,
have ((flip (forall₂ r) ∘r forall₂ r) ∘r perm) b d,
by rwa [← forall₂_comp_perm_eq_perm_comp_forall₂, ← relation.comp_assoc] at this,
let ⟨b', ⟨c', hbc, hcb⟩, hbd⟩ := this in
have b' = b, from right_unique_forall₂' hr hcb hbc,
this ▸ hbd
lemma rel_perm (hr : bi_unique r) : (forall₂ r ⇒ forall₂ r ⇒ (↔)) perm perm :=
assume a b hab c d hcd, iff.intro
(rel_perm_imp hr.2 hab hcd)
(rel_perm_imp hr.left.flip hab.flip hcd.flip)
end rel
section subperm
/-- `subperm l₁ l₂`, denoted `l₁ <+~ l₂`, means that `l₁` is a sublist of
a permutation of `l₂`. This is an analogue of `l₁ ⊆ l₂` which respects
multiplicities of elements, and is used for the `≤` relation on multisets. -/
def subperm (l₁ l₂ : list α) : Prop := ∃ l ~ l₁, l <+ l₂
infix ` <+~ `:50 := subperm
theorem nil_subperm {l : list α} : [] <+~ l :=
⟨[], perm.nil, by simp⟩
theorem perm.subperm_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l <+~ l₁ ↔ l <+~ l₂ :=
suffices ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ ~ l₂ → l <+~ l₁ → l <+~ l₂,
from ⟨this p, this p.symm⟩,
λ l₁ l₂ p ⟨u, pu, su⟩,
let ⟨v, pv, sv⟩ := exists_perm_sublist su p in
⟨v, pv.trans pu, sv⟩
theorem perm.subperm_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l ↔ l₂ <+~ l :=
⟨λ ⟨u, pu, su⟩, ⟨u, pu.trans p, su⟩,
λ ⟨u, pu, su⟩, ⟨u, pu.trans p.symm, su⟩⟩
theorem sublist.subperm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
⟨l₁, perm.refl _, s⟩
theorem perm.subperm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
⟨l₂, p.symm, sublist.refl _⟩
@[refl] theorem subperm.refl (l : list α) : l <+~ l := (perm.refl _).subperm
@[trans] theorem subperm.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → l₂ <+~ l₃ → l₁ <+~ l₃
| s ⟨l₂', p₂, s₂⟩ :=
let ⟨l₁', p₁, s₁⟩ := p₂.subperm_left.2 s in ⟨l₁', p₁, s₁.trans s₂⟩
theorem subperm.length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| ⟨l, p, s⟩ := p.length_eq ▸ length_le_of_sublist s
theorem subperm.perm_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → length l₂ ≤ length l₁ → l₁ ~ l₂
| ⟨l, p, s⟩ h :=
suffices l = l₂, from this ▸ p.symm,
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s $ p.symm.length_eq ▸ h
theorem subperm.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+~ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+~ l₁) : l₁ ~ l₂ :=
h₁.perm_of_length_le h₂.length_le
theorem subperm.subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ⟨l, p, s⟩ := subset.trans p.symm.subset s.subset
lemma subperm.filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
⦃l l' : list α⦄ (h : l <+~ l') : filter p l <+~ filter p l' :=
begin
obtain ⟨xs, hp, h⟩ := h,
exact ⟨_, hp.filter p, h.filter p⟩
end
end subperm
theorem sublist.exists_perm_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → ∃ l, l₂ ~ l₁ ++ l
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil := ⟨nil, perm.refl _⟩
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) :=
let ⟨l, p⟩ := sublist.exists_perm_append s in
⟨a::l, (p.cons a).trans perm_middle.symm⟩
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) :=
let ⟨l, p⟩ := sublist.exists_perm_append s in
⟨l, p.cons a⟩
theorem perm.countp_eq (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ ~ l₂) : countp p l₁ = countp p l₂ :=
by rw [countp_eq_length_filter, countp_eq_length_filter];
exact (s.filter _).length_eq
theorem subperm.countp_le (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p]
{l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+~ l₂ → countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂
| ⟨l, p', s⟩ := p'.countp_eq p ▸ s.countp_le p
theorem perm.count_eq [decidable_eq α] {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) (a) : count a l₁ = count a l₂ :=
p.countp_eq _
theorem subperm.count_le [decidable_eq α] {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+~ l₂) (a) : count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
s.countp_le _
theorem perm.foldl_eq' {f : β → α → β} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
(∀ (x ∈ l₁) (y ∈ l₁) z, f (f z x) y = f (f z y) x) → ∀ b, foldl f b l₁ = foldl f b l₂ :=
perm_induction_on p
(λ H b, rfl)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r H b, r (λ x hx y hy, H _ (or.inr hx) _ (or.inr hy)) _)
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p r H b,
begin
simp only [foldl],
rw [H x (or.inr $ or.inl rfl) y (or.inl rfl)],
exact r (λ x hx y hy, H _ (or.inr $ or.inr hx) _ (or.inr $ or.inr hy)) _
end)
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ H b, eq.trans (r₁ H b)
(r₂ (λ x hx y hy, H _ (p₁.symm.subset hx) _ (p₁.symm.subset hy)) b))
theorem perm.foldl_eq {f : β → α → β} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (rcomm : right_commutative f) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
∀ b, foldl f b l₁ = foldl f b l₂ :=
p.foldl_eq' $ λ x hx y hy z, rcomm z x y
theorem perm.foldr_eq {f : α → β → β} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (lcomm : left_commutative f) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
∀ b, foldr f b l₁ = foldr f b l₂ :=
perm_induction_on p
(λ b, rfl)
(λ x t₁ t₂ p r b, by simp; rw [r b])
(λ x y t₁ t₂ p r b, by simp; rw [lcomm, r b])
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ r₁ r₂ a, eq.trans (r₁ a) (r₂ a))
lemma perm.rec_heq {β : list α → Sort*} {f : Πa l, β l → β (a::l)} {b : β []} {l l' : list α}
(hl : perm l l')
(f_congr : ∀{a l l' b b'}, perm l l' → b == b' → f a l b == f a l' b')
(f_swap : ∀{a a' l b}, f a (a'::l) (f a' l b) == f a' (a::l) (f a l b)) :
@list.rec α β b f l == @list.rec α β b f l' :=
begin
induction hl,
case list.perm.nil { refl },
case list.perm.cons : a l l' h ih { exact f_congr h ih },
case list.perm.swap : a a' l { exact f_swap },
case list.perm.trans : l₁ l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ ih₁ ih₂ { exact heq.trans ih₁ ih₂ }
end
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [is_associative α op] [is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
lemma perm.fold_op_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ <*> a = l₂ <*> a :=
h.foldl_eq (right_comm _ is_commutative.comm is_associative.assoc) _
end
section comm_monoid
/-- If elements of a list commute with each other, then their product does not
depend on the order of elements-/
@[to_additive]
lemma perm.prod_eq' [monoid α] {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂)
(hc : l₁.pairwise (λ x y, x * y = y * x)) :
l₁.prod = l₂.prod :=
h.foldl_eq' (forall_of_forall_of_pairwise (λ x y h z, (h z).symm) (λ x hx z, rfl) $
hc.imp $ λ x y h z, by simp only [mul_assoc, h]) _
variable [comm_monoid α]
@[to_additive]
lemma perm.prod_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : perm l₁ l₂) : prod l₁ = prod l₂ :=
h.fold_op_eq
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_reverse (l : list α) : prod l.reverse = prod l :=
(reverse_perm l).prod_eq
end comm_monoid
theorem perm_inv_core {a : α} {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α} : l₁++a::r₁ ~ l₂++a::r₂ → l₁++r₁ ~ l₂++r₂ :=
begin
generalize e₁ : l₁++a::r₁ = s₁, generalize e₂ : l₂++a::r₂ = s₂,
intro p, revert l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ e₁ e₂,
refine perm_induction_on p _ (λ x t₁ t₂ p IH, _) (λ x y t₁ t₂ p IH, _)
(λ t₁ t₂ t₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, _); intros l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ e₁ e₂,
{ apply (not_mem_nil a).elim, rw ← e₁, simp },
{ cases l₁ with y l₁; cases l₂ with z l₂;
dsimp at e₁ e₂; injections; subst x,
{ substs t₁ t₂, exact p },
{ substs z t₁ t₂, exact p.trans perm_middle },
{ substs y t₁ t₂, exact perm_middle.symm.trans p },
{ substs z t₁ t₂, exact (IH rfl rfl).cons y } },
{ rcases l₁ with _|⟨y, _|⟨z, l₁⟩⟩; rcases l₂ with _|⟨u, _|⟨v, l₂⟩⟩;
dsimp at e₁ e₂; injections; substs x y,
{ substs r₁ r₂, exact p.cons a },
{ substs r₁ r₂, exact p.cons u },
{ substs r₁ v t₂, exact (p.trans perm_middle).cons u },
{ substs r₁ r₂, exact p.cons y },
{ substs r₁ r₂ y u, exact p.cons a },
{ substs r₁ u v t₂, exact ((p.trans perm_middle).cons y).trans (swap _ _ _) },
{ substs r₂ z t₁, exact (perm_middle.symm.trans p).cons y },
{ substs r₂ y z t₁, exact (swap _ _ _).trans ((perm_middle.symm.trans p).cons u) },
{ substs u v t₁ t₂, exact (IH rfl rfl).swap' _ _ } },
{ substs t₁ t₃,
have : a ∈ t₂ := p₁.subset (by simp),
rcases mem_split this with ⟨l₂, r₂, e₂⟩,
subst t₂, exact (IH₁ rfl rfl).trans (IH₂ rfl rfl) }
end
theorem perm.cons_inv {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ ~ a::l₂ → l₁ ~ l₂ :=
@perm_inv_core _ _ [] [] _ _
@[simp] theorem perm_cons (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ ~ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
⟨perm.cons_inv, perm.cons a⟩
theorem perm_append_left_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ ~ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := (perm_cons a).trans (perm_append_left_iff l)
theorem perm_append_right_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l ~ l₂++l ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
⟨λ p, (perm_append_left_iff _).1 $ perm_append_comm.trans $ p.trans perm_append_comm,
perm.append_right _⟩
theorem perm_option_to_list {o₁ o₂ : option α} : o₁.to_list ~ o₂.to_list ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ p, _, λ e, e ▸ perm.refl _⟩,
cases o₁ with a; cases o₂ with b, {refl},
{ cases p.length_eq },
{ cases p.length_eq },
{ exact option.mem_to_list.1 (p.symm.subset $ by simp) }
end
theorem subperm_cons (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+~ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨l, p, s⟩, begin
cases s with _ _ _ s' u _ _ s',
{ exact (p.subperm_left.2 $ (sublist_cons _ _).subperm).trans s'.subperm },
{ exact ⟨u, p.cons_inv, s'⟩ }
end, λ ⟨l, p, s⟩, ⟨a::l, p.cons a, s.cons2 _ _ _⟩⟩
theorem cons_subperm_of_mem {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (h₁ : a ∉ l₁) (h₂ : a ∈ l₂)
(s : l₁ <+~ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
begin
rcases s with ⟨l, p, s⟩,
induction s generalizing l₁,
case list.sublist.slnil { cases h₂ },
case list.sublist.cons : r₁ r₂ b s' ih {
simp at h₂,
cases h₂ with e m,
{ subst b, exact ⟨a::r₁, p.cons a, s'.cons2 _ _ _⟩ },
{ rcases ih m d₁ h₁ p with ⟨t, p', s'⟩, exact ⟨t, p', s'.cons _ _ _⟩ } },
case list.sublist.cons2 : r₁ r₂ b s' ih {
have bm : b ∈ l₁ := (p.subset $ mem_cons_self _ _),
have am : a ∈ r₂ := h₂.resolve_left (λ e, h₁ $ e.symm ▸ bm),
rcases mem_split bm with ⟨t₁, t₂, rfl⟩,
have st : t₁ ++ t₂ <+ t₁ ++ b :: t₂ := by simp,
rcases ih am (nodup_of_sublist st d₁)
(mt (λ x, st.subset x) h₁)
(perm.cons_inv $ p.trans perm_middle) with ⟨t, p', s'⟩,
exact ⟨b::t, (p'.cons b).trans $ (swap _ _ _).trans (perm_middle.symm.cons a), s'.cons2 _ _ _⟩ }
end
theorem subperm_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+~ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := (subperm_cons a).trans (subperm_append_left l)
theorem subperm_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+~ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
(perm_append_comm.subperm_left.trans perm_append_comm.subperm_right).trans (subperm_append_left l)
theorem subperm.exists_of_length_lt {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <+~ l₂ → length l₁ < length l₂ → ∃ a, a :: l₁ <+~ l₂
| ⟨l, p, s⟩ h :=
suffices length l < length l₂ → ∃ (a : α), a :: l <+~ l₂, from
(this $ p.symm.length_eq ▸ h).imp (λ a, (p.cons a).subperm_right.1),
begin
clear subperm.exists_of_length_lt p h l₁, rename l₂ u,
induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH _ _ b s IH; intro h,
{ cases h },
{ cases lt_or_eq_of_le (nat.le_of_lt_succ h : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) with h h,
{ exact (IH h).imp (λ a s, s.trans (sublist_cons _ _).subperm) },
{ exact ⟨a, eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h ▸ subperm.refl _⟩ } },
{ exact (IH $ nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h).imp
(λ a s, (swap _ _ _).subperm_right.1 $ (subperm_cons _).2 s) }
end
theorem subperm_of_subset_nodup
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : nodup l₁) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
begin
induction d with a l₁' h d IH,
{ exact ⟨nil, perm.nil, nil_sublist _⟩ },
{ cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
simp at h,
exact cons_subperm_of_mem d h H₁ (IH H₂) }
end
theorem perm_ext {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d₁ : nodup l₁) (d₂ : nodup l₂) :
l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ ∀a, a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂ :=
⟨λ p a, p.mem_iff, λ H, subperm.antisymm
(subperm_of_subset_nodup d₁ (λ a, (H a).1))
(subperm_of_subset_nodup d₂ (λ a, (H a).2))⟩
theorem nodup.sublist_ext {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : nodup l)
(s₁ : l₁ <+ l) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l) : l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨λ h, begin
induction s₂ with l₂ l a s₂ IH l₂ l a s₂ IH generalizing l₁,
{ exact h.eq_nil },
{ simp at d,
cases s₁ with _ _ _ s₁ l₁ _ _ s₁,
{ exact IH d.2 s₁ h },
{ apply d.1.elim,
exact subperm.subset ⟨_, h.symm, s₂⟩ (mem_cons_self _ _) } },
{ simp at d,
cases s₁ with _ _ _ s₁ l₁ _ _ s₁,
{ apply d.1.elim,
exact subperm.subset ⟨_, h, s₁⟩ (mem_cons_self _ _) },
{ rw IH d.2 s₁ h.cons_inv } }
end, λ h, by rw h⟩
section
variable [decidable_eq α]
-- attribute [congr]
theorem perm.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.erase a ~ l₂.erase a :=
if h₁ : a ∈ l₁ then
have h₂ : a ∈ l₂, from p.subset h₁,
perm.cons_inv $ (perm_cons_erase h₁).symm.trans $ p.trans (perm_cons_erase h₂)
else
have h₂ : a ∉ l₂, from mt p.mem_iff.2 h₁,
by rw [erase_of_not_mem h₁, erase_of_not_mem h₂]; exact p
theorem subperm_cons_erase (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+~ a :: l.erase a :=
begin
by_cases h : a ∈ l,
{ exact (perm_cons_erase h).subperm },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem h],
exact (sublist_cons _ _).subperm }
end
theorem erase_subperm (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+~ l :=
(erase_sublist _ _).subperm
theorem subperm.erase {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (h : l₁ <+~ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+~ l₂.erase a :=
let ⟨l, hp, hs⟩ := h in ⟨l.erase a, hp.erase _, hs.erase _⟩
theorem perm.diff_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t : list α) (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁.diff t ~ l₂.diff t :=
by induction t generalizing l₁ l₂ h; simp [*, perm.erase]
theorem perm.diff_left (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : t₁ ~ t₂) : l.diff t₁ = l.diff t₂ :=
by induction h generalizing l; simp [*, perm.erase, erase_comm]
<|> exact (ih_1 _).trans (ih_2 _)
theorem perm.diff {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (hl : l₁ ~ l₂) (ht : t₁ ~ t₂) :
l₁.diff t₁ ~ l₂.diff t₂ :=
ht.diff_left l₂ ▸ hl.diff_right _
theorem subperm.diff_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+~ l₂) (t : list α) :
l₁.diff t <+~ l₂.diff t :=
by induction t generalizing l₁ l₂ h; simp [*, subperm.erase]
theorem erase_cons_subperm_cons_erase (a b : α) (l : list α) :
(a :: l).erase b <+~ a :: l.erase b :=
begin
by_cases h : a = b,
{ subst b,
rw [erase_cons_head],
apply subperm_cons_erase },
{ rw [erase_cons_tail _ h] }
end
theorem subperm_cons_diff {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (a :: l₁).diff l₂ <+~ a :: l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] := ⟨a::l₁, by simp⟩
| l₁ (b::l₂) :=
begin
simp only [diff_cons],
refine ((erase_cons_subperm_cons_erase a b l₁).diff_right l₂).trans _,
apply subperm_cons_diff
end
theorem subset_cons_diff {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (a :: l₁).diff l₂ ⊆ a :: l₁.diff l₂ :=
subperm_cons_diff.subset
theorem perm.bag_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t : list α) (h : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.bag_inter t ~ l₂.bag_inter t :=
begin
induction h with x _ _ _ _ x y _ _ _ _ _ _ ih_1 ih_2 generalizing t, {simp},
{ by_cases x ∈ t; simp [*, perm.cons] },
{ by_cases x = y, {simp [h]},
by_cases xt : x ∈ t; by_cases yt : y ∈ t,
{ simp [xt, yt, mem_erase_of_ne h, mem_erase_of_ne (ne.symm h), erase_comm, swap] },
{ simp [xt, yt, mt mem_of_mem_erase, perm.cons] },
{ simp [xt, yt, mt mem_of_mem_erase, perm.cons] },
{ simp [xt, yt] } },
{ exact (ih_1 _).trans (ih_2 _) }
end
theorem perm.bag_inter_left (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list α} (p : t₁ ~ t₂) :
l.bag_inter t₁ = l.bag_inter t₂ :=
begin
induction l with a l IH generalizing t₁ t₂ p, {simp},
by_cases a ∈ t₁,
{ simp [h, p.subset h, IH (p.erase _)] },
{ simp [h, mt p.mem_iff.2 h, IH p] }
end
theorem perm.bag_inter {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (hl : l₁ ~ l₂) (ht : t₁ ~ t₂) :
l₁.bag_inter t₁ ~ l₂.bag_inter t₂ :=
ht.bag_inter_left l₂ ▸ hl.bag_inter_right _
theorem cons_perm_iff_perm_erase {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₂ ∧ l₁ ~ l₂.erase a :=
⟨λ h, have a ∈ l₂, from h.subset (mem_cons_self a l₁),
⟨this, (h.trans $ perm_cons_erase this).cons_inv⟩,
λ ⟨m, h⟩, (h.cons a).trans (perm_cons_erase m).symm⟩
theorem perm_iff_count {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ ∀ a, count a l₁ = count a l₂ :=
⟨perm.count_eq, λ H, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂,
{ cases l₂ with b l₂, {refl},
specialize H b, simp at H, contradiction },
{ have : a ∈ l₂ := count_pos.1 (by rw ← H; simp; apply nat.succ_pos),
refine ((IH $ λ b, _).cons a).trans (perm_cons_erase this).symm,
specialize H b,
rw (perm_cons_erase this).count_eq at H,
by_cases b = a; simp [h] at H ⊢; assumption }
end⟩
lemma subperm.cons_right {α : Type*} {l l' : list α} (x : α) (h : l <+~ l') : l <+~ x :: l' :=
h.trans (sublist_cons x l').subperm
/-- The list version of `add_tsub_cancel_of_le` for multisets. -/
lemma subperm_append_diff_self_of_count_le {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, count x l₁ ≤ count x l₂) : l₁ ++ l₂.diff l₁ ~ l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁ with hd tl IH generalizing l₂,
{ simp },
{ have : hd ∈ l₂,
{ rw ←count_pos,
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (count_pos.mpr (mem_cons_self _ _)) (h hd (mem_cons_self _ _)) },
replace this : l₂ ~ hd :: l₂.erase hd := perm_cons_erase this,
refine perm.trans _ this.symm,
rw [cons_append, diff_cons, perm_cons],
refine IH (λ x hx, _),
specialize h x (mem_cons_of_mem _ hx),
rw (perm_iff_count.mp this) at h,
by_cases hx : x = hd,
{ subst hd,
simpa [nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using h },
{ simpa [hx] using h } },
end
/-- The list version of `multiset.le_iff_count`. -/
lemma subperm_ext_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <+~ l₂ ↔ ∀ x ∈ l₁, count x l₁ ≤ count x l₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h x hx, subperm.count_le h x, λ h, _⟩,
suffices : l₁ <+~ (l₂.diff l₁ ++ l₁),
{ refine this.trans (perm.subperm _),
exact perm_append_comm.trans (subperm_append_diff_self_of_count_le h) },
convert (subperm_append_right _).mpr nil_subperm using 1
end
lemma subperm.cons_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+~ l₂)
(x : α) (hx : count x l₁ < count x l₂) :
x :: l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
begin
rw subperm_ext_iff at h ⊢,
intros y hy,
by_cases hy' : y = x,
{ subst x,
simpa using nat.succ_le_of_lt hx },
{ rw count_cons_of_ne hy',
refine h y _,
simpa [hy'] using hy }
end
instance decidable_perm : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ ~ l₂)
| [] [] := is_true $ perm.refl _
| [] (b::l₂) := is_false $ λ h, by have := h.nil_eq; contradiction
| (a::l₁) l₂ := by haveI := decidable_perm l₁ (l₂.erase a);
exact decidable_of_iff' _ cons_perm_iff_perm_erase
-- @[congr]
theorem perm.erase_dup {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
erase_dup l₁ ~ erase_dup l₂ :=
perm_iff_count.2 $ λ a,
if h : a ∈ l₁
then by simp [nodup_erase_dup, h, p.subset h]
else by simp [h, mt p.mem_iff.2 h]
-- attribute [congr]
theorem perm.insert (a : α)
{l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : insert a l₁ ~ insert a l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁
then by simpa [h, p.subset h] using p
else by simpa [h, mt p.mem_iff.2 h] using p.cons a
theorem perm_insert_swap (x y : α) (l : list α) :
insert x (insert y l) ~ insert y (insert x l) :=
begin
by_cases xl : x ∈ l; by_cases yl : y ∈ l; simp [xl, yl],
by_cases xy : x = y, { simp [xy] },
simp [not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem xy xl,
not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (ne.symm xy) yl],
constructor
end
theorem perm_insert_nth {α} (x : α) (l : list α) {n} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
insert_nth n x l ~ x :: l :=
begin
induction l generalizing n,
{ cases n, refl, cases h },
cases n,
{ simp [insert_nth] },
{ simp only [insert_nth, modify_nth_tail],
transitivity,
{ apply perm.cons, apply l_ih,
apply nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h },
{ apply perm.swap } }
end
theorem perm.union_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t₁ : list α) (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ ∪ t₁ ~ l₂ ∪ t₁ :=
begin
induction h with a _ _ _ ih _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih_1 ih_2; try {simp},
{ exact ih.insert a },
{ apply perm_insert_swap },
{ exact ih_1.trans ih_2 }
end
theorem perm.union_left (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : t₁ ~ t₂) : l ∪ t₁ ~ l ∪ t₂ :=
by induction l; simp [*, perm.insert]
-- @[congr]
theorem perm.union {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : l₁ ∪ t₁ ~ l₂ ∪ t₂ :=
(p₁.union_right t₁).trans (p₂.union_left l₂)
theorem perm.inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t₁ : list α) : l₁ ~ l₂ → l₁ ∩ t₁ ~ l₂ ∩ t₁ :=
perm.filter _
theorem perm.inter_left (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list α} (p : t₁ ~ t₂) : l ∩ t₁ = l ∩ t₂ :=
by { dsimp [(∩), list.inter], congr, funext a, rw [p.mem_iff] }
-- @[congr]
theorem perm.inter {l₁ l₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : l₁ ∩ t₁ ~ l₂ ∩ t₂ :=
p₂.inter_left l₂ ▸ p₁.inter_right t₁
theorem perm.inter_append {l t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : disjoint t₁ t₂) :
l ∩ (t₁ ++ t₂) ~ l ∩ t₁ ++ l ∩ t₂ :=
begin
induction l,
case list.nil
{ simp },
case list.cons : x xs l_ih
{ by_cases h₁ : x ∈ t₁,
{ have h₂ : x ∉ t₂ := h h₁,
simp * },
by_cases h₂ : x ∈ t₂,
{ simp only [*, inter_cons_of_not_mem, false_or, mem_append, inter_cons_of_mem, not_false_iff],
transitivity,
{ apply perm.cons _ l_ih, },
change [x] ++ xs ∩ t₁ ++ xs ∩ t₂ ~ xs ∩ t₁ ++ ([x] ++ xs ∩ t₂),
rw [← list.append_assoc],
solve_by_elim [perm.append_right, perm_append_comm] },
{ simp * } },
end
end
theorem perm.pairwise_iff {R : α → α → Prop} (S : symmetric R) :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂), pairwise R l₁ ↔ pairwise R l₂ :=
suffices ∀ {l₁ l₂}, l₁ ~ l₂ → pairwise R l₁ → pairwise R l₂, from λ l₁ l₂ p, ⟨this p, this p.symm⟩,
λ l₁ l₂ p d, begin
induction d with a l₁ h d IH generalizing l₂,
{ rw ← p.nil_eq, constructor },
{ have : a ∈ l₂ := p.subset (mem_cons_self _ _),
rcases mem_split this with ⟨s₂, t₂, rfl⟩,
have p' := (p.trans perm_middle).cons_inv,
refine (pairwise_middle S).2 (pairwise_cons.2 ⟨λ b m, _, IH _ p'⟩),
exact h _ (p'.symm.subset m) }
end
theorem perm.nodup_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ~ l₂ → (nodup l₁ ↔ nodup l₂) :=
perm.pairwise_iff $ @ne.symm α
theorem perm.bind_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → list β) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.bind f ~ l₂.bind f :=
begin
induction p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, {simp},
{ simp, exact IH.append_left _ },
{ simp, rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc], exact perm_append_comm.append_right _ },
{ exact IH₁.trans IH₂ }
end
theorem perm.bind_left (l : list α) {f g : α → list β} (h : ∀ a, f a ~ g a) :
l.bind f ~ l.bind g :=
by induction l with a l IH; simp; exact (h a).append IH
theorem bind_append_perm (l : list α) (f g : α → list β) :
l.bind f ++ l.bind g ~ l.bind (λ x, f x ++ g x) :=
begin
induction l with a l IH; simp,
refine (perm.trans _ (IH.append_left _)).append_left _,
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc],
exact perm_append_comm.append_right _
end
theorem perm.product_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (t₁ : list β) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
product l₁ t₁ ~ product l₂ t₁ :=
p.bind_right _
theorem perm.product_left (l : list α) {t₁ t₂ : list β} (p : t₁ ~ t₂) :
product l t₁ ~ product l t₂ :=
perm.bind_left _ $ λ a, p.map _
@[congr] theorem perm.product {l₁ l₂ : list α} {t₁ t₂ : list β}
(p₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₂ : t₁ ~ t₂) : product l₁ t₁ ~ product l₂ t₂ :=
(p₁.product_right t₁).trans (p₂.product_left l₂)
theorem sublists_cons_perm_append (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists (a :: l) ~ sublists l ++ map (cons a) (sublists l) :=
begin
simp only [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_cons, cons_append, perm_cons],
refine (perm.cons _ _).trans perm_middle.symm,
induction sublists_aux l cons with b l IH; simp,
exact (IH.cons _).trans perm_middle.symm
end
theorem sublists_perm_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, sublists l ~ sublists' l
| [] := perm.refl _
| (a::l) := let IH := sublists_perm_sublists' l in
by rw sublists'_cons; exact
(sublists_cons_perm_append _ _).trans (IH.append (IH.map _))
theorem revzip_sublists (l : list α) :
∀ l₁ l₂, (l₁, l₂) ∈ revzip l.sublists → l₁ ++ l₂ ~ l :=
begin
rw revzip,
apply list.reverse_rec_on l,
{ intros l₁ l₂ h, simp at h, simp [h] },
{ intros l a IH l₁ l₂ h,
rw [sublists_concat, reverse_append, zip_append, ← map_reverse,
zip_map_right, zip_map_left] at h; [skip, {simp}],
simp only [prod.mk.inj_iff, mem_map, mem_append, prod.map_mk, prod.exists] at h,
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂', h, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁', l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩,
{ rw ← append_assoc,
exact (IH _ _ h).append_right _ },
{ rw append_assoc,
apply (perm_append_comm.append_left _).trans,
rw ← append_assoc,
exact (IH _ _ h).append_right _ } }
end
theorem revzip_sublists' (l : list α) :
∀ l₁ l₂, (l₁, l₂) ∈ revzip l.sublists' → l₁ ++ l₂ ~ l :=
begin
rw revzip,
induction l with a l IH; intros l₁ l₂ h,
{ simp at h, simp [h] },
{ rw [sublists'_cons, reverse_append, zip_append, ← map_reverse,
zip_map_right, zip_map_left] at h; [simp at h, simp],
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂', h, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁', h, rfl⟩,
{ exact perm_middle.trans ((IH _ _ h).cons _) },
{ exact (IH _ _ h).cons _ } }
end
theorem perm_lookmap (f : α → option α) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(H : pairwise (λ a b, ∀ (c ∈ f a) (d ∈ f b), a = b ∧ c = d) l₁)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookmap f l₁ ~ lookmap f l₂ :=
begin
let F := λ a b, ∀ (c ∈ f a) (d ∈ f b), a = b ∧ c = d,
change pairwise F l₁ at H,
induction p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, {simp},
{ cases h : f a,
{ simp [h], exact IH (pairwise_cons.1 H).2 },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, p] } },
{ cases h₁ : f a with c; cases h₂ : f b with d,
{ simp [h₁, h₂], apply swap },
{ simp [h₁, lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₂], apply swap },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₁, h₂], apply swap },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₁, lookmap_cons_some _ _ h₂],
rcases (pairwise_cons.1 H).1 _ (or.inl rfl) _ h₂ _ h₁ with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩,
refl } },
{ refine (IH₁ H).trans (IH₂ ((p₁.pairwise_iff _).1 H)),
exact λ a b h c h₁ d h₂, (h d h₂ c h₁).imp eq.symm eq.symm }
end
theorem perm.erasep (f : α → Prop) [decidable_pred f] {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(H : pairwise (λ a b, f a → f b → false) l₁)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : erasep f l₁ ~ erasep f l₂ :=
begin
let F := λ a b, f a → f b → false,
change pairwise F l₁ at H,
induction p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, {simp},
{ by_cases h : f a,
{ simp [h, p] },
{ simp [h], exact IH (pairwise_cons.1 H).2 } },
{ by_cases h₁ : f a; by_cases h₂ : f b; simp [h₁, h₂],
{ cases (pairwise_cons.1 H).1 _ (or.inl rfl) h₂ h₁ },
{ apply swap } },
{ refine (IH₁ H).trans (IH₂ ((p₁.pairwise_iff _).1 H)),
exact λ a b h h₁ h₂, h h₂ h₁ }
end
lemma perm.take_inter {α} [decidable_eq α] {xs ys : list α} (n : ℕ)
(h : xs ~ ys) (h' : ys.nodup) :
xs.take n ~ ys.inter (xs.take n) :=
begin
simp only [list.inter] at *,
induction h generalizing n,
case list.perm.nil : n
{ simp only [not_mem_nil, filter_false, take_nil] },
case list.perm.cons : h_x h_l₁ h_l₂ h_a h_ih n
{ cases n; simp only [mem_cons_iff, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, filter_cons_of_pos,
perm_cons, take, not_mem_nil, filter_false],
cases h' with _ _ h₁ h₂,
convert h_ih h₂ n using 1,
apply filter_congr,
introv h, simp only [(h₁ x h).symm, false_or], },
case list.perm.swap : h_x h_y h_l n
{ cases h' with _ _ h₁ h₂,
cases h₂ with _ _ h₂ h₃,
have := h₁ _ (or.inl rfl),
cases n; simp only [mem_cons_iff, not_mem_nil, filter_false, take],
cases n; simp only [mem_cons_iff, false_or, true_or, filter, *, nat.nat_zero_eq_zero, if_true,
not_mem_nil, eq_self_iff_true, or_false, if_false, perm_cons, take],
{ rw filter_eq_nil.2, intros, solve_by_elim [ne.symm], },
{ convert perm.swap _ _ _, rw @filter_congr _ _ (∈ take n h_l),
{ clear h₁, induction n generalizing h_l; simp only [not_mem_nil, filter_false, take],
cases h_l; simp only [mem_cons_iff, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, filter_cons_of_pos,
true_and, take, not_mem_nil, filter_false, take_nil],
cases h₃ with _ _ h₃ h₄,
rwa [@filter_congr _ _ (∈ take n_n h_l_tl), n_ih],
{ introv h, apply h₂ _ (or.inr h), },
{ introv h, simp only [(h₃ x h).symm, false_or], }, },
{ introv h, simp only [(h₂ x h).symm, (h₁ x (or.inr h)).symm, false_or], } } },
case list.perm.trans : h_l₁ h_l₂ h_l₃ h₀ h₁ h_ih₀ h_ih₁ n
{ transitivity,
{ apply h_ih₀, rwa h₁.nodup_iff },
{ apply perm.filter _ h₁, } },
end
lemma perm.drop_inter {α} [decidable_eq α] {xs ys : list α} (n : ℕ)
(h : xs ~ ys) (h' : ys.nodup) :
xs.drop n ~ ys.inter (xs.drop n) :=
begin
by_cases h'' : n ≤ xs.length,
{ let n' := xs.length - n,
have h₀ : n = xs.length - n',
{ dsimp [n'], rwa tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le, } ,
have h₁ : n' ≤ xs.length,
{ apply tsub_le_self },
have h₂ : xs.drop n = (xs.reverse.take n').reverse,
{ rw [reverse_take _ h₁, h₀, reverse_reverse], },
rw [h₂],
apply (reverse_perm _).trans,
rw inter_reverse,
apply perm.take_inter _ _ h',
apply (reverse_perm _).trans; assumption, },
{ have : drop n xs = [],
{ apply eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero,
rw [length_drop, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le],
apply le_of_not_ge h'' },
simp [this, list.inter], }
end
lemma perm.slice_inter {α} [decidable_eq α] {xs ys : list α} (n m : ℕ)
(h : xs ~ ys) (h' : ys.nodup) :
list.slice n m xs ~ ys ∩ (list.slice n m xs) :=
begin
simp only [slice_eq],
have : n ≤ n + m := nat.le_add_right _ _,
have := h.nodup_iff.2 h',
apply perm.trans _ (perm.inter_append _).symm;
solve_by_elim [perm.append, perm.drop_inter, perm.take_inter, disjoint_take_drop, h, h']
{ max_depth := 7 },
end
/- enumerating permutations -/
section permutations
theorem perm_of_mem_permutations_aux :
∀ {ts is l : list α}, l ∈ permutations_aux ts is → l ~ ts ++ is :=
begin
refine permutations_aux.rec (by simp) _,
introv IH1 IH2 m,
rw [permutations_aux_cons, permutations, mem_foldr_permutations_aux2] at m,
rcases m with m | ⟨l₁, l₂, m, _, e⟩,
{ exact (IH1 m).trans perm_middle },
{ subst e,
have p : l₁ ++ l₂ ~ is,
{ simp [permutations] at m,
cases m with e m, {simp [e]},
exact is.append_nil ▸ IH2 m },
exact ((perm_middle.trans (p.cons _)).append_right _).trans (perm_append_comm.cons _) }
end
theorem perm_of_mem_permutations {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : l₁ ∈ permutations l₂) : l₁ ~ l₂ :=
(eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).elim (λ e, e ▸ perm.refl _)
(λ m, append_nil l₂ ▸ perm_of_mem_permutations_aux m)
theorem length_permutations_aux : ∀ ts is : list α,
length (permutations_aux ts is) + is.length! = (length ts + length is)! :=
begin
refine permutations_aux.rec (by simp) _,
intros t ts is IH1 IH2,
have IH2 : length (permutations_aux is nil) + 1 = is.length!,
{ simpa using IH2 },
simp [-add_comm, nat.factorial, nat.add_succ, mul_comm] at IH1,
rw [permutations_aux_cons,
length_foldr_permutations_aux2' _ _ _ _ _
(λ l m, (perm_of_mem_permutations m).length_eq),
permutations, length, length, IH2,
nat.succ_add, nat.factorial_succ, mul_comm (nat.succ _), ← IH1,
add_comm (_*_), add_assoc, nat.mul_succ, mul_comm]
end
theorem length_permutations (l : list α) : length (permutations l) = (length l)! :=
length_permutations_aux l []
theorem mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma {is l : list α}
(H : l ~ [] ++ is → (∃ ts' ~ [], l = ts' ++ is) ∨ l ∈ permutations_aux is [])
: l ~ is → l ∈ permutations is :=
by simpa [permutations, perm_nil] using H
theorem mem_permutations_aux_of_perm :
∀ {ts is l : list α}, l ~ is ++ ts → (∃ is' ~ is, l = is' ++ ts) ∨ l ∈ permutations_aux ts is :=
begin
refine permutations_aux.rec (by simp) _,
intros t ts is IH1 IH2 l p,
rw [permutations_aux_cons, mem_foldr_permutations_aux2],
rcases IH1 (p.trans perm_middle) with ⟨is', p', e⟩ | m,
{ clear p, subst e,
rcases mem_split (p'.symm.subset (mem_cons_self _ _)) with ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩,
subst is',
have p := (perm_middle.symm.trans p').cons_inv,
cases l₂ with a l₂',
{ exact or.inl ⟨l₁, by simpa using p⟩ },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr ⟨l₁, a::l₂',
mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma IH2 p, by simp⟩) } },
{ exact or.inr (or.inl m) }
end
@[simp] theorem mem_permutations {s t : list α} : s ∈ permutations t ↔ s ~ t :=
⟨perm_of_mem_permutations, mem_permutations_of_perm_lemma mem_permutations_aux_of_perm⟩
theorem perm_permutations'_aux_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) :
(permutations'_aux a l).bind (permutations'_aux b) ~
(permutations'_aux b l).bind (permutations'_aux a) :=
begin
induction l with c l ih, {simp [swap]},
simp [permutations'_aux], apply perm.swap',
have : ∀ a b,
(map (cons c) (permutations'_aux a l)).bind (permutations'_aux b) ~
map (cons b ∘ cons c) (permutations'_aux a l) ++
map (cons c) ((permutations'_aux a l).bind (permutations'_aux b)),
{ intros,
simp only [map_bind, permutations'_aux],
refine (bind_append_perm _ (λ x, [_]) _).symm.trans _,
rw [← map_eq_bind, ← bind_map] },
refine (((this _ _).append_left _).trans _).trans ((this _ _).append_left _).symm,
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc],
exact perm_append_comm.append (ih.map _),
end
theorem perm.permutations' {s t : list α} (p : s ~ t) :
permutations' s ~ permutations' t :=
begin
induction p with a s t p IH a b l s t u p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, {simp},
{ simp only [permutations'], exact IH.bind_right _ },
{ simp only [permutations'],
rw [bind_assoc, bind_assoc], apply perm.bind_left, apply perm_permutations'_aux_comm },
{ exact IH₁.trans IH₂ }
end
theorem permutations_perm_permutations' (ts : list α) : ts.permutations ~ ts.permutations' :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ : ∃ n, length ts < n := ⟨_, nat.lt_succ_self _⟩,
induction n with n IH generalizing ts, {cases h},
refine list.reverse_rec_on ts (λ h, _) (λ ts t _ h, _) h, {simp [permutations]},
rw [← concat_eq_append, length_concat, nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at h,
have IH₂ := (IH ts.reverse (by rwa [length_reverse])).trans (reverse_perm _).permutations',
simp only [permutations_append, foldr_permutations_aux2,
permutations_aux_nil, permutations_aux_cons, append_nil],
refine (perm_append_comm.trans ((IH₂.bind_right _).append ((IH _ h).map _))).trans
(perm.trans _ perm_append_comm.permutations'),
rw [map_eq_bind, singleton_append, permutations'],
convert bind_append_perm _ _ _, funext ys,
rw [permutations'_aux_eq_permutations_aux2, permutations_aux2_append]
end
@[simp] theorem mem_permutations' {s t : list α} : s ∈ permutations' t ↔ s ~ t :=
(permutations_perm_permutations' _).symm.mem_iff.trans mem_permutations
theorem perm.permutations {s t : list α} (h : s ~ t) : permutations s ~ permutations t :=
(permutations_perm_permutations' _).trans $ h.permutations'.trans
(permutations_perm_permutations' _).symm
@[simp] theorem perm_permutations_iff {s t : list α} : permutations s ~ permutations t ↔ s ~ t :=
⟨λ h, mem_permutations.1 $ h.mem_iff.1 $ mem_permutations.2 (perm.refl _), perm.permutations⟩
@[simp] theorem perm_permutations'_iff {s t : list α} : permutations' s ~ permutations' t ↔ s ~ t :=
⟨λ h, mem_permutations'.1 $ h.mem_iff.1 $ mem_permutations'.2 (perm.refl _), perm.permutations'⟩
lemma nth_le_permutations'_aux (s : list α) (x : α) (n : ℕ)
(hn : n < length (permutations'_aux x s)) :
(permutations'_aux x s).nth_le n hn = s.insert_nth n x :=
begin
induction s with y s IH generalizing n,
{ simp only [length, permutations'_aux, nat.lt_one_iff] at hn,
simp [hn] },
{ cases n,
{ simp },
{ simpa using IH _ _ } }
end
lemma count_permutations'_aux_self [decidable_eq α] (l : list α) (x : α) :
count (x :: l) (permutations'_aux x l) = length (take_while ((=) x) l) + 1 :=
begin
induction l with y l IH generalizing x,
{ simp [take_while], },
{ rw [permutations'_aux, count_cons_self],
by_cases hx : x = y,
{ subst hx,
simpa [take_while, nat.succ_inj'] using IH _ },
{ rw take_while,
rw if_neg hx,
cases permutations'_aux x l with a as,
{ simp },
{ rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem, length, zero_add],
simp [hx, ne.symm hx] } } }
end
@[simp] lemma length_permutations'_aux (s : list α) (x : α) :
length (permutations'_aux x s) = length s + 1 :=
begin
induction s with y s IH,
{ simp },
{ simpa using IH }
end
@[simp] lemma permutations'_aux_nth_le_zero (s : list α) (x : α)
(hn : 0 < length (permutations'_aux x s) := by simp) :
(permutations'_aux x s).nth_le 0 hn = x :: s :=
nth_le_permutations'_aux _ _ _ _
lemma injective_permutations'_aux (x : α) : function.injective (permutations'_aux x) :=
begin
intros s t h,
apply insert_nth_injective s.length x,
have hl : s.length = t.length := by simpa using congr_arg length h,
rw [←nth_le_permutations'_aux s x s.length (by simp),
←nth_le_permutations'_aux t x s.length (by simp [hl])],
simp [h, hl]
end
lemma nodup_permutations'_aux_of_not_mem (s : list α) (x : α) (hx : x ∉ s) :
nodup (permutations'_aux x s) :=
begin
induction s with y s IH,
{ simp },
{ simp only [not_or_distrib, mem_cons_iff] at hx,
simp only [not_and, exists_eq_right_right, mem_map, permutations'_aux, nodup_cons],
refine ⟨λ _, ne.symm hx.left, _⟩,
rw nodup_map_iff,
{ exact IH hx.right },
{ simp } }
end
lemma nodup_permutations'_aux_iff {s : list α} {x : α} :
nodup (permutations'_aux x s) ↔ x ∉ s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, nodup_permutations'_aux_of_not_mem _ _⟩,
intro H,
obtain ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := nth_le_of_mem H,
rw nodup_iff_nth_le_inj at h,
suffices : k = k + 1,
{ simpa using this },
refine h k (k + 1) _ _ _,
{ simpa [nat.lt_succ_iff] using hk.le },
{ simpa using hk },
rw [nth_le_permutations'_aux, nth_le_permutations'_aux],
have hl : length (insert_nth k x s) = length (insert_nth (k + 1) x s),
{ rw [length_insert_nth _ _ hk.le, length_insert_nth _ _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt hk)] },
refine ext_le hl (λ n hn hn', _),
rcases lt_trichotomy n k with H|rfl|H,
{ rw [nth_le_insert_nth_of_lt _ _ _ _ H (H.trans hk),
nth_le_insert_nth_of_lt _ _ _ _ (H.trans (nat.lt_succ_self _))] },
{ rw [nth_le_insert_nth_self _ _ _ hk.le,
nth_le_insert_nth_of_lt _ _ _ _ (nat.lt_succ_self _) hk, hk'] },
{ rcases (nat.succ_le_of_lt H).eq_or_lt with rfl|H',
{ rw [nth_le_insert_nth_self _ _ _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt hk)],
convert hk' using 1,
convert nth_le_insert_nth_add_succ _ _ _ 0 _,
simpa using hk },
{ obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt H',
rw [length_insert_nth _ _ hk.le, nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, nat.succ_add] at hn,
rw nth_le_insert_nth_add_succ,
convert nth_le_insert_nth_add_succ s x k m.succ _ using 2,
{ simp [nat.add_succ, nat.succ_add] },
{ simp [add_left_comm, add_comm] },
{ simpa [nat.add_succ] using hn },
{ simpa [nat.succ_add] using hn } } }
end
lemma nodup_permutations (s : list α) (hs : nodup s) :
nodup s.permutations :=
begin
rw (permutations_perm_permutations' s).nodup_iff,
induction hs with x l h h' IH,
{ simp },
{ rw [permutations'],
rw nodup_bind,
split,
{ intros ys hy,
rw mem_permutations' at hy,
rw [nodup_permutations'_aux_iff, hy.mem_iff],
exact λ H, h x H rfl },
{ refine IH.pairwise_of_forall_ne (λ as ha bs hb H, _),
rw disjoint_iff_ne,
rintro a ha' b hb' rfl,
obtain ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ := nth_le_of_mem ha',
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hb',
rw mem_permutations' at ha hb,
have hl : as.length = bs.length := (ha.trans hb.symm).length_eq,
simp only [nat.lt_succ_iff, length_permutations'_aux] at hn hm,
rw nth_le_permutations'_aux at hn' hm',
have hx : nth_le (insert_nth n x as) m
(by rwa [length_insert_nth _ _ hn, nat.lt_succ_iff, hl]) = x,
{ simp [hn', ←hm', hm] },
have hx' : nth_le (insert_nth m x bs) n
(by rwa [length_insert_nth _ _ hm, nat.lt_succ_iff, ←hl]) = x,
{ simp [hm', ←hn', hn] },
rcases lt_trichotomy n m with ht|ht|ht,
{ suffices : x ∈ bs,
{ exact h x (hb.subset this) rfl },
rw [←hx', nth_le_insert_nth_of_lt _ _ _ _ ht (ht.trans_le hm)],
exact nth_le_mem _ _ _ },
{ simp only [ht] at hm' hn',
rw ←hm' at hn',
exact H (insert_nth_injective _ _ hn') },
{ suffices : x ∈ as,
{ exact h x (ha.subset this) rfl },
rw [←hx, nth_le_insert_nth_of_lt _ _ _ _ ht (ht.trans_le hn)],
exact nth_le_mem _ _ _ } } }
end
-- TODO: `nodup s.permutations ↔ nodup s`
-- TODO: `count s s.permutations = (zip_with count s s.tails).prod`
end permutations
end list
|
2400f70def24990544c5c848fb669c4c8ffe023b | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/data/zmod/basic.lean | 7de13bf84899fb02da1eba4e2b8c223faa89ef14 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,638 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Chris Hughes
-/
import data.int.modeq data.int.gcd data.fintype.basic data.pnat.basic tactic.ring
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
There are two types defined, `zmod n`, which is for integers modulo a positive nat `n : ℕ+`.
`zmodp` is the type of integers modulo a prime number, for which a field structure is defined.
## Definitions
* `val` is inherited from `fin` and returns the least natural number in the equivalence class
* `val_min_abs` returns the integer closest to zero in the equivalence class.
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `zmod n` into any semiring. This is a semiring hom if the ring has
characteristic dividing `n`
## Implentation notes
`zmod` and `zmodp` are implemented as different types so that the field instance for `zmodp` can be
synthesized. This leads to a lot of code duplication and most of the functions and theorems for
`zmod` are restated for `zmodp`
-/
open nat nat.modeq int
def zmod (n : ℕ+) := fin n
namespace zmod
instance (n : ℕ+) : has_neg (zmod n) :=
⟨λ a, ⟨nat_mod (-(a.1 : ℤ)) n,
have h : (n : ℤ) ≠ 0 := int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 n.pos,
have h₁ : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = abs n := (abs_of_nonneg (int.coe_nat_nonneg n)).symm,
by rw [← int.coe_nat_lt, nat_mod, to_nat_of_nonneg (int.mod_nonneg _ h), h₁];
exact int.mod_lt _ h⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ+) : add_comm_semigroup (zmod n) :=
{ add_assoc := λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨c, hc⟩, fin.eq_of_veq
(show ((a + b) % n + c) ≡ (a + (b + c) % n) [MOD n],
from calc ((a + b) % n + c) ≡ a + b + c [MOD n] : modeq_add (nat.mod_mod _ _) rfl
... ≡ a + (b + c) [MOD n] : by rw add_assoc
... ≡ (a + (b + c) % n) [MOD n] : modeq_add rfl (nat.mod_mod _ _).symm),
add_comm := λ ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩, fin.eq_of_veq (show (a + b) % n = (b + a) % n, by rw add_comm),
..fin.has_add }
instance (n : ℕ+) : comm_semigroup (zmod n) :=
{ mul_assoc := λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨c, hc⟩, fin.eq_of_veq
(calc ((a * b) % n * c) ≡ a * b * c [MOD n] : modeq_mul (nat.mod_mod _ _) rfl
... ≡ a * (b * c) [MOD n] : by rw mul_assoc
... ≡ a * (b * c % n) [MOD n] : modeq_mul rfl (nat.mod_mod _ _).symm),
mul_comm := λ ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩, fin.eq_of_veq (show (a * b) % n = (b * a) % n, by rw mul_comm),
..fin.has_mul }
instance (n : ℕ+) : has_one (zmod n) := ⟨⟨(1 % n), nat.mod_lt _ n.pos⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ+) : has_zero (zmod n) := ⟨⟨0, n.pos⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ+) : inhabited (zmod n) := ⟨0⟩
instance zmod_one.subsingleton : subsingleton (zmod 1) :=
⟨λ a b, fin.eq_of_veq (by rw [eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_lt_succ a.2),
eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_lt_succ b.2)])⟩
lemma add_val {n : ℕ+} : ∀ a b : zmod n, (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma mul_val {n : ℕ+} : ∀ a b : zmod n, (a * b).val = (a.val * b.val) % n
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma one_val {n : ℕ+} : (1 : zmod n).val = 1 % n := rfl
@[simp] lemma zero_val (n : ℕ+) : (0 : zmod n).val = 0 := rfl
private lemma one_mul_aux (n : ℕ+) (a : zmod n) : (1 : zmod n) * a = a :=
begin
cases n with n hn,
cases n with n,
{ exact (lt_irrefl _ hn).elim },
{ cases n with n,
{ exact @subsingleton.elim (zmod 1) _ _ _ },
{ have h₁ : a.1 % n.succ.succ = a.1 := nat.mod_eq_of_lt a.2,
have h₂ : 1 % n.succ.succ = 1 := nat.mod_eq_of_lt dec_trivial,
refine fin.eq_of_veq _,
simp [mul_val, one_val, h₁, h₂] } }
end
private lemma left_distrib_aux (n : ℕ+) : ∀ a b c : zmod n, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
λ ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨c, hc⟩, fin.eq_of_veq
(calc a * ((b + c) % n) ≡ a * (b + c) [MOD n] : modeq_mul rfl (nat.mod_mod _ _)
... ≡ a * b + a * c [MOD n] : by rw mul_add
... ≡ (a * b) % n + (a * c) % n [MOD n] : modeq_add (nat.mod_mod _ _).symm (nat.mod_mod _ _).symm)
instance (n : ℕ+) : comm_ring (zmod n) :=
{ zero_add := λ ⟨a, ha⟩, fin.eq_of_veq (show (0 + a) % n = a, by rw zero_add; exact nat.mod_eq_of_lt ha),
add_zero := λ ⟨a, ha⟩, fin.eq_of_veq (nat.mod_eq_of_lt ha),
add_left_neg :=
λ ⟨a, ha⟩, fin.eq_of_veq (show (((-a : ℤ) % n).to_nat + a) % n = 0,
from int.coe_nat_inj
begin
have hn : (n : ℤ) ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 n.pos)).symm,
rw [int.coe_nat_mod, int.coe_nat_add, to_nat_of_nonneg (int.mod_nonneg _ hn), add_comm],
simp,
end),
one_mul := one_mul_aux n,
mul_one := λ a, by rw mul_comm; exact one_mul_aux n a,
left_distrib := left_distrib_aux n,
right_distrib := λ a b c, by rw [mul_comm, left_distrib_aux, mul_comm _ b, mul_comm]; refl,
..zmod.has_zero n,
..zmod.has_one n,
..zmod.has_neg n,
..zmod.add_comm_semigroup n,
..zmod.comm_semigroup n }
lemma val_cast_nat {n : ℕ+} (a : ℕ) : (a : zmod n).val = a % n :=
begin
induction a with a ih,
{ rw [nat.zero_mod]; refl },
{ rw [succ_eq_add_one, nat.cast_add, add_val, ih],
show (a % n + ((0 + (1 % n)) % n)) % n = (a + 1) % n,
rw [zero_add, nat.mod_mod],
exact nat.modeq.modeq_add (nat.mod_mod a n) (nat.mod_mod 1 n) }
end
lemma neg_val' {m : pnat} (n : zmod m) : (-n).val = (m - n.val) % m :=
have ((-n).val + n.val) % m = (m - n.val + n.val) % m,
by { rw [←add_val, add_left_neg, nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_lt n.is_lt), nat.mod_self], refl },
(nat.mod_eq_of_lt (fin.is_lt _)).symm.trans (nat.modeq.modeq_add_cancel_right rfl this)
lemma neg_val {m : pnat} (n : zmod m) : (-n).val = if n = 0 then 0 else m - n.val :=
begin
rw neg_val',
by_cases h : n = 0; simp [h],
cases n with n nlt; cases n; dsimp, { contradiction },
rw nat.mod_eq_of_lt,
apply nat.sub_lt m.2 (nat.succ_pos _),
end
lemma mk_eq_cast {n : ℕ+} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (⟨a, h⟩ : zmod n) = (a : zmod n) :=
fin.eq_of_veq (by rw [val_cast_nat, nat.mod_eq_of_lt h])
@[simp] lemma cast_self_eq_zero {n : ℕ+} : ((n : ℕ) : zmod n) = 0 :=
fin.eq_of_veq (show (n : zmod n).val = 0, by simp [val_cast_nat])
lemma val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ+} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : zmod n).val = a :=
by rw [val_cast_nat, nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
@[simp] lemma cast_mod_nat (n : ℕ+) (a : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : zmod n) = a :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw ← nat.mod_add_div a n}; simp
@[simp, priority 980]
lemma cast_mod_nat' {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : zmod ⟨n, hn⟩) = a :=
cast_mod_nat ⟨n, hn⟩ a
@[simp] lemma cast_val {n : ℕ+} (a : zmod n) : (a.val : zmod n) = a :=
by cases a; simp [mk_eq_cast]
@[simp] lemma cast_mod_int (n : ℕ+) (a : ℤ) : ((a % (n : ℕ) : ℤ) : zmod n) = a :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw ← int.mod_add_div a n}; simp
@[simp, priority 980]
lemma cast_mod_int' {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : ℤ) :
((a % (n : ℕ) : ℤ) : zmod ⟨n, hn⟩) = a := cast_mod_int ⟨n, hn⟩ a
lemma val_cast_int {n : ℕ+} (a : ℤ) : (a : zmod n).val = (a % (n : ℕ)).nat_abs :=
have h : nat_abs (a % (n : ℕ)) < n := int.coe_nat_lt.1 begin
rw [nat_abs_of_nonneg (mod_nonneg _ (int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 n.pos))],
conv {to_rhs, rw ← abs_of_nonneg (int.coe_nat_nonneg n)},
exact int.mod_lt _ (int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 n.pos)
end,
int.coe_nat_inj $
by conv {to_lhs, rw [← cast_mod_int n a,
← nat_abs_of_nonneg (mod_nonneg _ (int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 n.pos)),
int.cast_coe_nat, val_cast_of_lt h] }
lemma coe_val_cast_int {n : ℕ+} (a : ℤ) : ((a : zmod n).val : ℤ) = a % (n : ℕ) :=
by rw [val_cast_int, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg (mod_nonneg _ (int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 n.pos))]
lemma eq_iff_modeq_nat {n : ℕ+} {a b : ℕ} : (a : zmod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
⟨λ h, by have := fin.veq_of_eq h;
rwa [val_cast_nat, val_cast_nat] at this,
λ h, fin.eq_of_veq $ by rwa [val_cast_nat, val_cast_nat]⟩
lemma eq_iff_modeq_nat' {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {a b : ℕ} : (a : zmod ⟨n, hn⟩) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
eq_iff_modeq_nat
lemma eq_iff_modeq_int {n : ℕ+} {a b : ℤ} : (a : zmod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD (n : ℕ)] :=
⟨λ h, by have := fin.veq_of_eq h;
rwa [val_cast_int, val_cast_int, ← int.coe_nat_eq_coe_nat_iff,
nat_abs_of_nonneg (int.mod_nonneg _ (int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 n.pos)),
nat_abs_of_nonneg (int.mod_nonneg _ (int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 n.pos))] at this,
λ h : a % (n : ℕ) = b % (n : ℕ),
by rw [← cast_mod_int n a, ← cast_mod_int n b, h]⟩
lemma eq_iff_modeq_int' {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {a b : ℤ} :
(a : zmod ⟨n, hn⟩) = b ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD (n : ℕ)] := eq_iff_modeq_int
lemma eq_zero_iff_dvd_nat {n : ℕ+} {a : ℕ} : (a : zmod n) = 0 ↔ (n : ℕ) ∣ a :=
by rw [← @nat.cast_zero (zmod n), eq_iff_modeq_nat, nat.modeq.modeq_zero_iff]
lemma eq_zero_iff_dvd_int {n : ℕ+} {a : ℤ} : (a : zmod n) = 0 ↔ ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) ∣ a :=
by rw [← @int.cast_zero (zmod n), eq_iff_modeq_int, int.modeq.modeq_zero_iff]
instance (n : ℕ+) : fintype (zmod n) := fin.fintype _
instance decidable_eq (n : ℕ+) : decidable_eq (zmod n) := fin.decidable_eq _
instance (n : ℕ+) : has_repr (zmod n) := fin.has_repr _
lemma card_zmod (n : ℕ+) : fintype.card (zmod n) = n := fintype.card_fin n
instance : subsingleton (units (zmod 2)) :=
⟨λ x y, begin
cases x with x xi,
cases y with y yi,
revert x y xi yi,
exact dec_trivial
end⟩
lemma le_div_two_iff_lt_neg {n : ℕ+} (hn : (n : ℕ) % 2 = 1)
{x : zmod n} (hx0 : x ≠ 0) : x.1 ≤ (n / 2 : ℕ) ↔ (n / 2 : ℕ) < (-x).1 :=
have hn2 : (n : ℕ) / 2 < n := nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul ((lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left n.pos).2 dec_trivial),
have hn2' : (n : ℕ) - n / 2 = n / 2 + 1,
by conv {to_lhs, congr, rw [← succ_sub_one n, succ_sub n.pos]};
rw [← two_mul_odd_div_two hn, two_mul, ← succ_add, nat.add_sub_cancel],
have hxn : (n : ℕ) - x.val < n,
begin
rw [nat.sub_lt_iff (le_of_lt x.2) (le_refl _), nat.sub_self],
rw ← zmod.cast_val x at hx0,
exact nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, by simpa [h] using hx0)
end,
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← nat.succ_le_iff, succ_eq_add_one, ← hn2', ← zero_add (- x), ← zmod.cast_self_eq_zero,
← sub_eq_add_neg, ← zmod.cast_val x, ← nat.cast_sub (le_of_lt x.2),
zmod.val_cast_nat, mod_eq_of_lt hxn, nat.sub_le_sub_left_iff (le_of_lt x.2)] }
lemma ne_neg_self {n : ℕ+} (hn1 : (n : ℕ) % 2 = 1) {a : zmod n} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ≠ -a :=
λ h, have a.val ≤ n / 2 ↔ (n : ℕ) / 2 < (-a).val := le_div_two_iff_lt_neg hn1 ha,
by rwa [← h, ← not_lt, not_iff_self] at this
@[simp] lemma cast_mul_right_val_cast {n m : ℕ+} (a : ℕ) :
((a : zmod (m * n)).val : zmod m) = (a : zmod m) :=
zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat.2 (by rw zmod.val_cast_nat;
exact nat.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_right _ (nat.mod_mod _ _))
@[simp] lemma cast_mul_left_val_cast {n m : ℕ+} (a : ℕ) :
((a : zmod (n * m)).val : zmod m) = (a : zmod m) :=
zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat.2 (by rw zmod.val_cast_nat;
exact nat.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_left _ (nat.mod_mod _ _))
lemma cast_val_cast_of_dvd {n m : ℕ+} (h : (m : ℕ) ∣ n) (a : ℕ) :
((a : zmod n).val : zmod m) = (a : zmod m) :=
let ⟨k , hk⟩ := h in
zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat.2 (nat.modeq.modeq_of_modeq_mul_right k
(by rw [← hk, zmod.val_cast_nat]; exact nat.mod_mod _ _))
/-- `unit_of_coprime` makes an element of `units (zmod n)` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unit_of_coprime {n : ℕ+} (x : ℕ) (h : nat.coprime x n) : units (zmod n) :=
have (x * gcd_a x ↑n : zmod n) = 1,
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, ← int.cast_one, ← int.cast_mul,
zmod.eq_iff_modeq_int, ← int.coe_nat_one, ← (show nat.gcd _ _ = _, from h)];
simpa using int.modeq.gcd_a_modeq x n,
⟨x, gcd_a x n, this, by simpa [mul_comm] using this⟩
@[simp] lemma cast_unit_of_coprime {n : ℕ+} (x : ℕ) (h : nat.coprime x n) :
(unit_of_coprime x h : zmod n) = x := rfl
def units_equiv_coprime {n : ℕ+} : units (zmod n) ≃ {x : zmod n // nat.coprime x.1 n} :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨x, nat.modeq.coprime_of_mul_modeq_one (x⁻¹).1.1 begin
have := units.ext_iff.1 (mul_right_inv x),
rwa [← zmod.cast_val ((1 : units (zmod n)) : zmod n), units.coe_one, zmod.one_val,
← zmod.cast_val ((x * x⁻¹ : units (zmod n)) : zmod n),
units.coe_mul, zmod.mul_val, zmod.cast_mod_nat, zmod.cast_mod_nat,
zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat] at this
end⟩,
inv_fun := λ x, unit_of_coprime x.1.1 x.2,
left_inv := λ ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, units.ext (by simp),
right_inv := λ ⟨_, _⟩, by simp }
/-- `val_min_abs x` returns the integer in the same equivalence class as `x` that is closest to `0`,
The result will be in the interval `(-n/2, n/2]` -/
def val_min_abs {n : ℕ+} (x : zmod n) : ℤ :=
if x.val ≤ n / 2 then x.val else x.val - n
@[simp] lemma coe_val_min_abs {n : ℕ+} (x : zmod n) :
(x.val_min_abs : zmod n) = x :=
by simp [zmod.val_min_abs]; split_ifs; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma nat_abs_val_min_abs_le {n : ℕ+} (x : zmod n) : x.val_min_abs.nat_abs ≤ n / 2 :=
have (x.val - n : ℤ) ≤ 0, from sub_nonpos.2 $ int.coe_nat_le.2 $ le_of_lt x.2,
begin
rw zmod.val_min_abs,
split_ifs with h,
{ exact h },
{ rw [← int.coe_nat_le, int.of_nat_nat_abs_of_nonpos this, neg_sub],
conv_lhs { congr, rw [coe_coe, ← nat.mod_add_div n 2, int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_mul,
int.coe_nat_bit0, int.coe_nat_one] },
rw ← sub_nonneg,
suffices : (0 : ℤ) ≤ x.val - ((n % 2 : ℕ) + (n / 2 : ℕ)),
{ exact le_trans this (le_of_eq $ by ring) },
exact sub_nonneg.2 (by rw [← int.coe_nat_add, int.coe_nat_le];
exact calc (n : ℕ) % 2 + n / 2 ≤ 1 + n / 2 :
add_le_add (nat.le_of_lt_succ (nat.mod_lt _ dec_trivial)) (le_refl _)
... ≤ x.val : by rw add_comm; exact nat.succ_le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge h)) }
end
@[simp] lemma val_min_abs_zero {n : ℕ+} : (0 : zmod n).val_min_abs = 0 :=
by simp [zmod.val_min_abs]
@[simp] lemma val_min_abs_eq_zero {n : ℕ+} (x : zmod n) :
x.val_min_abs = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h, begin
dsimp [zmod.val_min_abs] at h,
split_ifs at h,
{ exact fin.eq_of_veq (by simp * at *) },
{ exact absurd h (mt sub_eq_zero.1 (ne_of_lt $ int.coe_nat_lt.2 x.2)) }
end, λ hx0, hx0.symm ▸ zmod.val_min_abs_zero⟩
lemma cast_nat_abs_val_min_abs {n : ℕ+} (a : zmod n) :
(a.val_min_abs.nat_abs : zmod n) = if a.val ≤ (n : ℕ) / 2 then a else -a :=
have (a.val : ℤ) + -n ≤ 0, by erw [sub_nonpos, int.coe_nat_le]; exact le_of_lt a.2,
begin
dsimp [zmod.val_min_abs],
split_ifs,
{ simp },
{ erw [← int.cast_coe_nat, int.of_nat_nat_abs_of_nonpos this],
simp }
end
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_val_min_abs_neg {n : ℕ+} (a : zmod n) :
(-a).val_min_abs.nat_abs = a.val_min_abs.nat_abs :=
if haa : -a = a then by rw [haa]
else
have hpa : (n : ℕ) - a.val ≤ n / 2 ↔ (n : ℕ) / 2 < a.val,
from suffices (((n : ℕ) % 2) + 2 * (n / 2)) - a.val ≤ (n : ℕ) / 2 ↔ (n : ℕ) / 2 < a.val,
by rwa [nat.mod_add_div] at this,
begin
rw [nat.sub_le_iff, two_mul, ← add_assoc, nat.add_sub_cancel],
cases (n : ℕ).mod_two_eq_zero_or_one with hn0 hn1,
{ split,
{ exact λ h, lt_of_le_of_ne (le_trans (nat.le_add_left _ _) h)
begin
assume hna,
rw [← zmod.cast_val a, ← hna, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← nat.cast_add,
zmod.eq_zero_iff_dvd_nat, ← two_mul, ← zero_add (2 * _), ← hn0,
nat.mod_add_div] at haa,
exact haa (dvd_refl _)
end },
{ rw [hn0, zero_add], exact le_of_lt } },
{ rw [hn1, add_comm, nat.succ_le_iff] }
end,
have ha0 : ¬ a = 0, from λ ha0, by simp * at *,
begin
dsimp [zmod.val_min_abs],
rw [← not_le] at hpa,
simp only [if_neg ha0, zmod.neg_val, hpa, int.coe_nat_sub (le_of_lt a.2)],
split_ifs,
{ simp [sub_eq_add_neg] },
{ rw [← int.nat_abs_neg], simp }
end
lemma val_eq_ite_val_min_abs {n : ℕ+} (a : zmod n) :
(a.val : ℤ) = a.val_min_abs + if a.val ≤ n / 2 then 0 else n :=
by simp [zmod.val_min_abs]; split_ifs; simp
lemma neg_eq_self_mod_two : ∀ (a : zmod 2), -a = a := dec_trivial
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_mod_two (a : ℤ) : (a.nat_abs : zmod 2) = a :=
by cases a; simp [zmod.neg_eq_self_mod_two]
section
variables {α : Type*} [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] {n : ℕ+}
def cast : zmod n → α := nat.cast ∘ fin.val
end
end zmod
def zmodp (p : ℕ) (hp : prime p) : Type := zmod ⟨p, hp.pos⟩
namespace zmodp
variables {p : ℕ} (hp : prime p)
instance : comm_ring (zmodp p hp) := zmod.comm_ring ⟨p, hp.pos⟩
instance : inhabited (zmodp p hp) := ⟨0⟩
instance {p : ℕ} (hp : prime p) : has_inv (zmodp p hp) :=
⟨λ a, gcd_a a.1 p⟩
lemma add_val : ∀ a b : zmodp p hp, (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % p
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
lemma mul_val : ∀ a b : zmodp p hp, (a * b).val = (a.val * b.val) % p
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_val : (1 : zmodp p hp).val = 1 :=
nat.mod_eq_of_lt hp.one_lt
@[simp] lemma zero_val : (0 : zmodp p hp).val = 0 := rfl
lemma val_cast_nat (a : ℕ) : (a : zmodp p hp).val = a % p :=
@zmod.val_cast_nat ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _
lemma mk_eq_cast {a : ℕ} (h : a < p) : (⟨a, h⟩ : zmodp p hp) = (a : zmodp p hp) :=
@zmod.mk_eq_cast ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _ _
@[simp] lemma cast_self_eq_zero: (p : zmodp p hp) = 0 :=
fin.eq_of_veq $ by simp [val_cast_nat]
lemma val_cast_of_lt {a : ℕ} (h : a < p) : (a : zmodp p hp).val = a :=
@zmod.val_cast_of_lt ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _ h
@[simp] lemma cast_mod_nat (a : ℕ) : ((a % p : ℕ) : zmodp p hp) = a :=
@zmod.cast_mod_nat ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _
@[simp] lemma cast_val (a : zmodp p hp) : (a.val : zmodp p hp) = a :=
@zmod.cast_val ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _
@[simp] lemma cast_mod_int (a : ℤ) : ((a % p : ℤ) : zmodp p hp) = a :=
@zmod.cast_mod_int ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _
lemma val_cast_int (a : ℤ) : (a : zmodp p hp).val = (a % p).nat_abs :=
@zmod.val_cast_int ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _
lemma coe_val_cast_int (a : ℤ) : ((a : zmodp p hp).val : ℤ) = a % (p : ℕ) :=
@zmod.coe_val_cast_int ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _
lemma eq_iff_modeq_nat {a b : ℕ} : (a : zmodp p hp) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD p] :=
@zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _ _
lemma eq_iff_modeq_int {a b : ℤ} : (a : zmodp p hp) = b ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD p] :=
@zmod.eq_iff_modeq_int ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _ _
lemma eq_zero_iff_dvd_nat (a : ℕ) : (a : zmodp p hp) = 0 ↔ p ∣ a :=
@zmod.eq_zero_iff_dvd_nat ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _
lemma eq_zero_iff_dvd_int (a : ℤ) : (a : zmodp p hp) = 0 ↔ (p : ℤ) ∣ a :=
@zmod.eq_zero_iff_dvd_int ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ _
instance : fintype (zmodp p hp) := @zmod.fintype ⟨p, hp.pos⟩
instance decidable_eq : decidable_eq (zmodp p hp) := fin.decidable_eq _
instance X (h : prime 2) : subsingleton (units (zmodp 2 h)) :=
zmod.subsingleton
instance : has_repr (zmodp p hp) := fin.has_repr _
@[simp] lemma card_zmodp : fintype.card (zmodp p hp) = p :=
@zmod.card_zmod ⟨p, hp.pos⟩
lemma le_div_two_iff_lt_neg {p : ℕ} (hp : prime p) (hp1 : p % 2 = 1)
{x : zmodp p hp} (hx0 : x ≠ 0) : x.1 ≤ (p / 2 : ℕ) ↔ (p / 2 : ℕ) < (-x).1 :=
@zmod.le_div_two_iff_lt_neg ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ hp1 _ hx0
lemma ne_neg_self (hp1 : p % 2 = 1) {a : zmodp p hp} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ≠ -a :=
@zmod.ne_neg_self ⟨p, hp.pos⟩ hp1 _ ha
variable {hp}
/-- `val_min_abs x` returns the integer in the same equivalence class as `x` that is closest to `0`,
The result will be in the interval `(-n/2, n/2]` -/
def val_min_abs (x : zmodp p hp) : ℤ := zmod.val_min_abs x
@[simp] lemma coe_val_min_abs (x : zmodp p hp) :
(x.val_min_abs : zmodp p hp) = x :=
zmod.coe_val_min_abs x
lemma nat_abs_val_min_abs_le (x : zmodp p hp) : x.val_min_abs.nat_abs ≤ p / 2 :=
zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_le x
@[simp] lemma val_min_abs_zero : (0 : zmodp p hp).val_min_abs = 0 :=
zmod.val_min_abs_zero
@[simp] lemma val_min_abs_eq_zero (x : zmodp p hp) : x.val_min_abs = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
zmod.val_min_abs_eq_zero x
lemma cast_nat_abs_val_min_abs (a : zmodp p hp) :
(a.val_min_abs.nat_abs : zmodp p hp) = if a.val ≤ p / 2 then a else -a :=
zmod.cast_nat_abs_val_min_abs a
@[simp] lemma nat_abs_val_min_abs_neg (a : zmodp p hp) :
(-a).val_min_abs.nat_abs = a.val_min_abs.nat_abs :=
zmod.nat_abs_val_min_abs_neg _
lemma val_eq_ite_val_min_abs (a : zmodp p hp) :
(a.val : ℤ) = a.val_min_abs + if a.val ≤ p / 2 then 0 else p :=
zmod.val_eq_ite_val_min_abs _
variable (hp)
lemma prime_ne_zero {q : ℕ} (hq : prime q) (hpq : p ≠ q) : (q : zmodp p hp) ≠ 0 :=
by rwa [← nat.cast_zero, ne.def, zmodp.eq_iff_modeq_nat, nat.modeq.modeq_zero_iff,
← hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd, coprime_primes hp hq]
lemma mul_inv_eq_gcd (a : ℕ) : (a : zmodp p hp) * a⁻¹ = nat.gcd a p :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat (nat.gcd _ _), nat.gcd_comm, nat.gcd_rec, ← (eq_iff_modeq_int _).2 (int.modeq.gcd_a_modeq _ _)];
simp [has_inv.inv, val_cast_nat]
private lemma mul_inv_cancel_aux : ∀ a : zmodp p hp, a ≠ 0 → a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
λ ⟨a, hap⟩ ha0, begin
rw [mk_eq_cast, ne.def, ← @nat.cast_zero (zmodp p hp), eq_iff_modeq_nat, modeq_zero_iff] at ha0,
have : nat.gcd p a = 1 := (prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp).2 ha0,
rw [mk_eq_cast _ hap, mul_inv_eq_gcd, nat.gcd_comm],
simp [nat.gcd_comm, this]
end
instance : field (zmodp p hp) :=
{ zero_ne_one := fin.ne_of_vne $ show 0 ≠ 1 % p,
by rw nat.mod_eq_of_lt hp.one_lt;
exact zero_ne_one,
mul_inv_cancel := mul_inv_cancel_aux hp,
inv_zero := show (gcd_a 0 p : zmodp p hp) = 0,
by unfold gcd_a xgcd xgcd_aux; refl,
..zmodp.comm_ring hp,
..zmodp.has_inv hp }
end zmodp
|
c64ca59591b20fa301e08fc29e154b2c2c0a763b | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/homotopy/cofiber.hlean | 7ff1801e0d1a0a6ab893504e0fc2c40cf88c0a4f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,663 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
The Cofiber Type
-/
import hit.pointed_pushout function .susp
open eq pushout unit pointed is_trunc is_equiv susp unit
definition cofiber {A B : Type} (f : A → B) := pushout (λ (a : A), ⋆) f
namespace cofiber
section
parameters {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
protected definition base [constructor] : cofiber f := inl ⋆
protected definition cod [constructor] : B → cofiber f := inr
protected definition contr_of_equiv [H : is_equiv f] : is_contr (cofiber f) :=
begin
fapply is_contr.mk, exact base,
intro a, induction a with [u, b],
{ cases u, reflexivity },
{ exact !glue ⬝ ap inr (right_inv f b) },
{ apply eq_pathover, refine _ ⬝hp !ap_id⁻¹, refine !ap_constant ⬝ph _,
apply move_bot_of_left, refine !idp_con ⬝ph _, apply transpose, esimp,
refine _ ⬝hp (ap (ap inr) !adj⁻¹), refine _ ⬝hp !ap_compose, apply square_Flr_idp_ap },
end
protected definition rec {A : Type} {B : Type} {f : A → B} {P : cofiber f → Type}
(Pinl : P (inl ⋆)) (Pinr : Π (x : B), P (inr x))
(Pglue : Π (x : A), pathover P Pinl (glue x) (Pinr (f x))) :
(Π y, P y) :=
begin
intro y, induction y, induction x, exact Pinl, exact Pinr x, esimp, exact Pglue x,
end
protected definition rec_on {A : Type} {B : Type} {f : A → B} {P : cofiber f → Type}
(y : cofiber f) (Pinl : P (inl ⋆)) (Pinr : Π (x : B), P (inr x))
(Pglue : Π (x : A), pathover P Pinl (glue x) (Pinr (f x))) : P y :=
begin
induction y, induction x, exact Pinl, exact Pinr x, esimp, exact Pglue x,
end
end
end cofiber
-- pointed version
definition pcofiber {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : Type* := ppushout (pconst A punit) f
namespace cofiber
protected definition prec {A B : Type*} {f : A →* B} {P : pcofiber f → Type}
(Pinl : P (inl ⋆)) (Pinr : Π (x : B), P (inr x))
(Pglue : Π (x : A), pathover P Pinl (pglue x) (Pinr (f x))) :
(Π (y : pcofiber f), P y) :=
begin
intro y, induction y, induction x, exact Pinl, exact Pinr x, esimp, exact Pglue x
end
protected definition prec_on {A B : Type*} {f : A →* B} {P : pcofiber f → Type}
(y : pcofiber f) (Pinl : P (inl ⋆)) (Pinr : Π (x : B), P (inr x))
(Pglue : Π (x : A), pathover P Pinl (pglue x) (Pinr (f x))) : P y :=
begin
induction y, induction x, exact Pinl, exact Pinr x, esimp, exact Pglue x
end
protected definition pelim_on {A B C : Type*} {f : A →* B} (y : pcofiber f)
(c : C) (g : B → C) (p : Π x, c = g (f x)) : C :=
begin
fapply pushout.elim_on y, exact (λ x, c), exact g, exact p
end
--TODO more pointed recursors
variables (A : Type*)
definition cofiber_unit : pcofiber (pconst A punit) ≃* psusp A :=
begin
fapply pequiv_of_pmap,
{ fconstructor, intro x, induction x, exact north, exact south, exact merid x,
reflexivity },
{ esimp, fapply adjointify,
intro s, induction s, exact inl ⋆, exact inr ⋆, apply glue a,
intro s, induction s, do 2 reflexivity, esimp,
apply eq_pathover, refine _ ⬝hp !ap_id⁻¹, apply hdeg_square,
refine !(ap_compose (pushout.elim _ _ _)) ⬝ _,
refine ap _ !elim_merid ⬝ _, apply elim_glue,
intro c, induction c with [n, s], induction n, reflexivity,
induction s, reflexivity, esimp, apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
refine _ ⬝ !ap_id⁻¹, refine !(ap_compose (pushout.elim _ _ _)) ⬝ _,
refine ap _ !elim_glue ⬝ _, apply elim_merid },
end
end cofiber
|
ce6ee98d8749c925a6aa19af971bacc7a14a704f | 4efff1f47634ff19e2f786deadd394270a59ecd2 | /src/group_theory/subgroup.lean | 41560dee4740493b47124622b966c5ba84229e7e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | agjftucker/mathlib | d634cd0d5256b6325e3c55bb7fb2403548371707 | 87fe50de17b00af533f72a102d0adefe4a2285e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,378,131,941 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 1,599,166,526,000 | 160,748,509 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,141,789,000 | 1,544,141,789,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 44,719 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import group_theory.submonoid
import algebra.group.conj
/-!
# Subgroups
This file defines multiplicative and additive subgroups as an extension of submonoids, in a bundled
form (unbundled subgroups are in `deprecated/subgroups.lean`).
We prove subgroups of a group form a complete lattice, and results about images and preimages of
subgroups under group homomorphisms. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid homomorphisms.
There are also theorems about the subgroups generated by an element or a subset of a group,
defined both inductively and as the infimum of the set of subgroups containing a given
element/subset.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are groups
- `A` is an add_group
- `H K` are subgroups of `G` or add_subgroups of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `subgroup G` : the type of subgroups of a group `G`
* `add_subgroup A` : the type of subgroups of an additive group `A`
* `complete_lattice (subgroup G)` : the subgroups of `G` form a complete lattice
* `closure k` : the minimal subgroup that includes the set `k`
* `subtype` : the natural group homomorphism from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`
* `gi` : `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set
* `comap H f` : the preimage of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a subgroup
* `map f H` : the image of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a subgroup
* `prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` is a
subgroup of `G × N`
* `monoid_hom.range f` : the range of the group homomorphism `f` is a subgroup
* `monoid_hom.ker f` : the kernel of a group homomorphism `f` is the subgroup of elements `x : G` such that
`f x = 1`
* `monoid_hom.eq_locus f g` : given group homomorphisms `f`, `g`, the elements of `G` such that `f x = g x`
form a subgroup of `G`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
open_locale big_operators
variables {G : Type*} [group G]
variables {A : Type*} [add_group A]
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A subgroup of a group `G` is a subset containing 1, closed under multiplication
and closed under multiplicative inverse. -/
structure subgroup (G : Type*) [group G] extends submonoid G :=
(inv_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → x⁻¹ ∈ carrier)
/-- An additive subgroup of an additive group `G` is a subset containing 0, closed
under addition and additive inverse. -/
structure add_subgroup (G : Type*) [add_group G] extends add_submonoid G:=
(neg_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → -x ∈ carrier)
attribute [to_additive] subgroup
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid] subgroup.to_submonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `subgroup` as a `submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc subgroup.to_submonoid
/-- Reinterpret an `add_subgroup` as an `add_submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid
/-- Map from subgroups of group `G` to `add_subgroup`s of `additive G`. -/
def subgroup.to_add_subgroup {G : Type*} [group G] (H : subgroup G) :
add_subgroup (additive G) :=
{ neg_mem' := H.inv_mem',
.. submonoid.to_add_submonoid H.to_submonoid}
/-- Map from `add_subgroup`s of `additive G` to subgroups of `G`. -/
def subgroup.of_add_subgroup {G : Type*} [group G] (H : add_subgroup (additive G)) :
subgroup G :=
{ inv_mem' := H.neg_mem',
.. submonoid.of_add_submonoid H.to_add_submonoid}
/-- Map from `add_subgroup`s of `add_group G` to subgroups of `multiplicative G`. -/
def add_subgroup.to_subgroup {G : Type*} [add_group G] (H : add_subgroup G) :
subgroup (multiplicative G) :=
{ inv_mem' := H.neg_mem',
.. add_submonoid.to_submonoid H.to_add_submonoid}
/-- Map from subgroups of `multiplicative G` to `add_subgroup`s of `add_group G`. -/
def add_subgroup.of_subgroup {G : Type*} [add_group G] (H : subgroup (multiplicative G)) :
add_subgroup G :=
{ neg_mem' := H.inv_mem',
.. add_submonoid.of_submonoid H.to_submonoid }
/-- Subgroups of group `G` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `additive G`. -/
def subgroup.add_subgroup_equiv (G : Type*) [group G] :
subgroup G ≃ add_subgroup (additive G) :=
{ to_fun := subgroup.to_add_subgroup,
inv_fun := subgroup.of_add_subgroup,
left_inv := λ x, by cases x; refl,
right_inv := λ x, by cases x; refl }
namespace subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance : has_coe (subgroup G) (set G) := { coe := subgroup.carrier }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_to_submonoid (K : subgroup G) : (K.to_submonoid : set G) = K := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : has_mem G (subgroup G) := ⟨λ m K, m ∈ (K : set G)⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : has_coe_to_sort (subgroup G) := ⟨_, λ G, (G : Type*)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive]
lemma mem_coe {K : subgroup G} {g : G} : g ∈ (K : set G) ↔ g ∈ K := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive]
lemma coe_coe (K : subgroup G) : ↥(K : set G) = K := rfl
-- note that `to_additive` transfers the `simp` attribute over but not the `norm_cast` attribute
attribute [norm_cast] add_subgroup.mem_coe
attribute [norm_cast] add_subgroup.coe_coe
end subgroup
@[to_additive]
protected lemma subgroup.exists {K : subgroup G} {p : K → Prop} :
(∃ x : K, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, p ⟨x, ‹x ∈ K›⟩ :=
set_coe.exists
@[to_additive]
protected lemma subgroup.forall {K : subgroup G} {p : K → Prop} :
(∀ x : K, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ K, p ⟨x, ‹x ∈ K›⟩ :=
set_coe.forall
namespace subgroup
variables (H K : subgroup G)
/-- Copy of a subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities.-/
@[to_additive "Copy of an additive subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities"]
protected def copy (K : subgroup G) (s : set G) (hs : s = K) : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := s,
one_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.one_mem',
mul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.mul_mem',
inv_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.inv_mem' }
/- Two subgroups are equal if the underlying set are the same. -/
@[to_additive "Two `add_group`s are equal if the underlying subsets are equal."]
theorem ext' {H K : subgroup G} (h : (H : set G) = K) : H = K :=
by { cases H, cases K, congr, exact h }
/- Two subgroups are equal if and only if the underlying subsets are equal. -/
@[to_additive "Two `add_subgroup`s are equal if and only if the underlying subsets are equal."]
protected theorem ext'_iff {H K : subgroup G} :
H = K ↔ (H : set G) = K := ⟨λ h, h ▸ rfl, ext'⟩
/-- Two subgroups are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext, to_additive "Two `add_subgroup`s are equal if they have the same elements."]
theorem ext {H K : subgroup G}
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ H ↔ x ∈ K) : H = K := ext' $ set.ext h
attribute [ext] add_subgroup.ext
/-- A subgroup contains the group's 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` contains the group's 0."]
theorem one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ H := H.one_mem'
/-- A subgroup is closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` is closed under addition."]
theorem mul_mem {x y : G} : x ∈ H → y ∈ H → x * y ∈ H := λ hx hy, H.mul_mem' hx hy
/-- A subgroup is closed under inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` is closed under inverse."]
theorem inv_mem {x : G} : x ∈ H → x⁻¹ ∈ H := λ hx, H.inv_mem' hx
@[simp, to_additive] theorem inv_mem_iff {x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
⟨λ h, inv_inv x ▸ H.inv_mem h, H.inv_mem⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨λ hba, by simpa using H.mul_mem hba (H.inv_mem h), λ hb, H.mul_mem hb h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨λ hab, by simpa using H.mul_mem (H.inv_mem h) hab, H.mul_mem h⟩
/-- Product of a list of elements in a subgroup is in the subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "Sum of a list of elements in an `add_subgroup` is in the `add_subgroup`."]
lemma list_prod_mem {l : list G} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ K) → l.prod ∈ K :=
K.to_submonoid.list_prod_mem
/-- Product of a multiset of elements in a subgroup of a `comm_group` is in the subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "Sum of a multiset of elements in an `add_subgroup` of an `add_comm_group`
is in the `add_subgroup`."]
lemma multiset_prod_mem {G} [comm_group G] (K : subgroup G) (g : multiset G) :
(∀ a ∈ g, a ∈ K) → g.prod ∈ K := K.to_submonoid.multiset_prod_mem g
/-- Product of elements of a subgroup of a `comm_group` indexed by a `finset` is in the
subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "Sum of elements in an `add_subgroup` of an `add_comm_group` indexed by a `finset`
is in the `add_subgroup`."]
lemma prod_mem {G : Type*} [comm_group G] (K : subgroup G)
{ι : Type*} {t : finset ι} {f : ι → G} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ K) :
∏ c in t, f c ∈ K :=
K.to_submonoid.prod_mem h
lemma pow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ K := K.to_submonoid.pow_mem hx
lemma gpow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K
| (int.of_nat n) := pow_mem _ hx n
| -[1+ n] := K.inv_mem $ K.pow_mem hx n.succ
/-- Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under subtraction"]
def of_div (s : set G) (hsn : s.nonempty) (hs : ∀ x y ∈ s, x * y⁻¹ ∈ s) : subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ s, from let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hsn in by simpa using hs x x hx hx,
have inv_mem : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s, from λ x hx, by simpa using hs 1 x one_mem hx,
{ carrier := s,
one_mem' := one_mem,
inv_mem' := inv_mem,
mul_mem' := λ x y hx hy, by simpa using hs x y⁻¹ hx (inv_mem y hy) }
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_group` inherits an addition."]
instance has_mul : has_mul H := H.to_submonoid.has_mul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_group` inherits a zero."]
instance has_one : has_one H := H.to_submonoid.has_one
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "A `add_subgroup` of a `add_group` inherits an inverse."]
instance has_inv : has_inv H := ⟨λ a, ⟨a⁻¹, H.inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_mul (x y : H) : (↑(x * y) : G) = ↑x * ↑y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_one : ((1 : H) : G) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_inv (x : H) : ↑(x⁻¹ : H) = (x⁻¹ : G) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast, to_additive] lemma coe_mk (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : ((⟨x, hx⟩ : H) : G) = x := rfl
attribute [norm_cast] add_subgroup.coe_add add_subgroup.coe_zero
add_subgroup.coe_neg add_subgroup.coe_mk
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_group` inherits an `add_group` structure."]
instance to_group {G : Type*} [group G] (H : subgroup G) : group H :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
mul_left_inv := λ x, subtype.eq $ mul_left_inv x,
.. H.to_submonoid.to_monoid }
/-- A subgroup of a `comm_group` is a `comm_group`. -/
@[to_additive "An `add_subgroup` of an `add_comm_group` is an `add_comm_group`."]
instance to_comm_group {G : Type*} [comm_group G] (H : subgroup G) : comm_group H :=
{ mul_comm := λ _ _, subtype.eq $ mul_comm _ _, .. H.to_group}
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural group hom from an `add_subgroup` of `add_group` `G` to `G`."]
def subtype : H →* G := ⟨coe, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
@[simp, to_additive] theorem coe_subtype : ⇑H.subtype = coe := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = x ^ n :=
coe_subtype H ▸ monoid_hom.map_pow _ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_gpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = x ^ n :=
coe_subtype H ▸ monoid_hom.map_gpow _ _ _
@[to_additive]
instance : has_le (subgroup G) := ⟨λ H K, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ H → x ∈ K⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma le_def {H K : subgroup G} : H ≤ K ↔ ∀ ⦃x : G⦄, x ∈ H → x ∈ K := iff.rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_subset_coe {H K : subgroup G} : (H : set G) ⊆ K ↔ H ≤ K := iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : partial_order (subgroup G) :=
{ le := (≤),
.. partial_order.lift (coe : subgroup G → set G) (λ a b, ext') }
/-- The subgroup `G` of the group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The `add_subgroup G` of the `add_group G`."]
instance : has_top (subgroup G) :=
⟨{ inv_mem' := λ _ _, set.mem_univ _ , .. (⊤ : submonoid G) }⟩
/-- The trivial subgroup `{1}` of an group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The trivial `add_subgroup` `{0}` of an `add_group` `G`."]
instance : has_bot (subgroup G) :=
⟨{ inv_mem' := λ _, by simp *, .. (⊥ : submonoid G) }⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : inhabited (subgroup G) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_bot {x : G} : x ∈ (⊥ : subgroup G) ↔ x = 1 := iff.rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_top (x : G) : x ∈ (⊤ : subgroup G) := set.mem_univ x
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_top : ((⊤ : subgroup G) : set G) = set.univ := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_bot : ((⊥ : subgroup G) : set G) = {1} := rfl
/-- The inf of two subgroups is their intersection. -/
@[to_additive "The inf of two `add_subgroups`s is their intersection."]
instance : has_inf (subgroup G) :=
⟨λ H₁ H₂,
{ inv_mem' := λ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩, ⟨H₁.inv_mem hx, H₂.inv_mem hx'⟩,
.. H₁.to_submonoid ⊓ H₂.to_submonoid }⟩
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_inf (p p' : subgroup G) : ((p ⊓ p' : subgroup G) : set G) = p ∩ p' := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_inf {p p' : subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' := iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : has_Inf (subgroup G) :=
⟨λ s,
{ inv_mem' := λ x hx, set.mem_bInter $ λ i h, i.inv_mem (by apply set.mem_bInter_iff.1 hx i h),
.. (⨅ S ∈ s, subgroup.to_submonoid S).copy (⋂ S ∈ s, ↑S) (by simp) }⟩
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_Inf (H : set (subgroup G)) : ((Inf H : subgroup G) : set G) = ⋂ s ∈ H, ↑s := rfl
attribute [norm_cast] coe_Inf add_subgroup.coe_Inf
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_Inf {S : set (subgroup G)} {x : G} : x ∈ Inf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p := set.mem_bInter_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_infi {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → subgroup G} {x : G} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i :=
by simp only [infi, mem_Inf, set.forall_range_iff]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_infi {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → subgroup G} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : set G) = ⋂ i, S i :=
by simp only [infi, coe_Inf, set.bInter_range]
attribute [norm_cast] coe_infi add_subgroup.coe_infi
/-- Subgroups of a group form a complete lattice. -/
@[to_additive "The `add_subgroup`s of an `add_group` form a complete lattice."]
instance : complete_lattice (subgroup G) :=
{ bot := (⊥),
bot_le := λ S x hx, (mem_bot.1 hx).symm ▸ S.one_mem,
top := (⊤),
le_top := λ S x hx, mem_top x,
inf := (⊓),
le_inf := λ a b c ha hb x hx, ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩,
inf_le_left := λ a b x, and.left,
inf_le_right := λ a b x, and.right,
.. complete_lattice_of_Inf (subgroup G) $ λ s, is_glb.of_image
(λ H K, show (H : set G) ≤ K ↔ H ≤ K, from coe_subset_coe) is_glb_binfi }
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_sup_left {S T : subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show S ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_left
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_sup_right {S T : subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show T ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_right
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_supr_of_mem {ι : Type*} {S : ι → subgroup G} (i : ι) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S i → x ∈ supr S :=
show S i ≤ supr S, from le_supr _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_Sup_of_mem {S : set (subgroup G)} {s : subgroup G}
(hs : s ∈ S) : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ s → x ∈ Sup S :=
show s ≤ Sup S, from le_Sup hs
/-- The `subgroup` generated by a set. -/
@[to_additive "The `add_subgroup` generated by a set"]
def closure (k : set G) : subgroup G := Inf {K | k ⊆ K}
variable {k : set G}
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_closure {x : G} : x ∈ closure k ↔ ∀ K : subgroup G, k ⊆ K → x ∈ K :=
mem_Inf
/-- The subgroup generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp, to_additive "The `add_subgroup` generated by a set includes the set."]
lemma subset_closure : k ⊆ closure k := λ x hx, mem_closure.2 $ λ K hK, hK hx
open set
/-- A subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "An additive subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`"]
lemma closure_le : closure k ≤ K ↔ k ⊆ K :=
⟨subset.trans subset_closure, λ h, Inf_le h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : k ⊆ K) (h₂ : K ≤ closure k) : closure k = K :=
le_antisymm ((closure_le $ K).2 h₁) h₂
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `1` and all elements of `k`, and
is preserved under multiplication and inverse, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure
of `k`. -/
@[to_additive "An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p` holds for `0` and all
elements of `k`, and is preserved under addition and isvers, then `p` holds for all elements
of the additive closure of `k`."]
lemma closure_induction {p : G → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure k)
(Hk : ∀ x ∈ k, p x) (H1 : p 1)
(Hmul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y))
(Hinv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ ⟨p, H1, Hmul, Hinv⟩ _).2 Hk h
attribute [elab_as_eliminator] subgroup.closure_induction add_subgroup.closure_induction
variable (G)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
@[to_additive "`closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set."]
protected def gi : galois_insertion (@closure G _) coe :=
{ choice := λ s _, closure s,
gc := λ s t, @closure_le _ _ t s,
le_l_u := λ s, subset_closure,
choice_eq := λ s h, rfl }
variable {G}
/-- Subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`. -/
@[to_additive "Additive subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`"]
lemma closure_mono ⦃h k : set G⦄ (h' : h ⊆ k) : closure h ≤ closure k :=
(subgroup.gi G).gc.monotone_l h'
/-- Closure of a subgroup `K` equals `K`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "Additive closure of an additive subgroup `K` equals `K`"]
lemma closure_eq : closure (K : set G) = K := (subgroup.gi G).l_u_eq K
@[simp, to_additive] lemma closure_empty : closure (∅ : set G) = ⊥ :=
(subgroup.gi G).gc.l_bot
@[simp, to_additive] lemma closure_univ : closure (univ : set G) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top G _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_union (s t : set G) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(subgroup.gi G).gc.l_sup
@[to_additive]
lemma closure_Union {ι} (s : ι → set G) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(subgroup.gi G).gc.l_supr
/-- The subgroup generated by an element of a group equals the set of integer number powers of
the element. -/
lemma mem_closure_singleton {x y : G} : y ∈ closure ({x} : set G) ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x ^ n = y :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hy, closure_induction hy _ _ _ _,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ gpow_mem _ (subset_closure $ mem_singleton x) n⟩,
{ intros y hy,
rw [eq_of_mem_singleton hy],
exact ⟨1, gpow_one x⟩ },
{ exact ⟨0, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨n + m, gpow_add x n m⟩ },
rintros _ ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨-n, gpow_neg x n⟩
end
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_supr_of_directed {ι} [hι : nonempty ι] {K : ι → subgroup G} (hK : directed (≤) K)
{x : G} :
x ∈ (supr K : subgroup G) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ K i :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ ⟨i, hi⟩, (le_def.1 $ le_supr K i) hi⟩,
suffices : x ∈ closure (⋃ i, (K i : set G)) → ∃ i, x ∈ K i,
by simpa only [closure_Union, closure_eq (K _)] using this,
refine (λ hx, closure_induction hx (λ _, mem_Union.1) _ _ _),
{ exact hι.elim (λ i, ⟨i, (K i).one_mem⟩) },
{ rintros x y ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩,
rcases hK i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩,
exact ⟨k, (K k).mul_mem (hki hi) (hkj hj)⟩ },
rintros _ ⟨i, hi⟩, exact ⟨i, inv_mem (K i) hi⟩
end
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_supr_of_directed {ι} [nonempty ι] {S : ι → subgroup G} (hS : directed (≤) S) :
((⨆ i, S i : subgroup G) : set G) = ⋃ i, ↑(S i) :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_supr_of_directed hS]
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_Sup_of_directed_on {K : set (subgroup G)} (Kne : K.nonempty)
(hK : directed_on (≤) K) {x : G} :
x ∈ Sup K ↔ ∃ s ∈ K, x ∈ s :=
begin
haveI : nonempty K := Kne.to_subtype,
simp only [Sup_eq_supr', mem_supr_of_directed hK.directed_coe, set_coe.exists, subtype.coe_mk]
end
variables {N : Type*} [group N] {P : Type*} [group P]
/-- The preimage of a subgroup along a monoid homomorphism is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of an `add_subgroup` along an `add_monoid` homomorphism
is an `add_subgroup`."]
def comap {N : Type*} [group N] (f : G →* N)
(H : subgroup N) : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := (f ⁻¹' H),
inv_mem' := λ a ha,
show f a⁻¹ ∈ H, by rw f.map_inv; exact H.inv_mem ha,
.. H.to_submonoid.comap f }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_comap (K : subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : (K.comap f : set G) = f ⁻¹' K := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_comap {K : subgroup N} {f : G →* N} {x : G} : x ∈ K.comap f ↔ f x ∈ K := iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_comap (K : subgroup P) (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) :
(K.comap g).comap f = K.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
/-- The image of a subgroup along a monoid homomorphism is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an `add_subgroup` along an `add_monoid` homomorphism
is an `add_subgroup`."]
def map (f : G →* N) (H : subgroup G) : subgroup N :=
{ carrier := (f '' H),
inv_mem' := by { rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, exact ⟨x⁻¹, H.inv_mem hx, f.map_inv x⟩ },
.. H.to_submonoid.map f }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_map (f : G →* N) (K : subgroup G) :
(K.map f : set N) = f '' K := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mem_map {f : G →* N} {K : subgroup G} {y : N} :
y ∈ K.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, f x = y :=
mem_image_iff_bex
@[to_additive]
lemma map_map (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : (K.map f).map g = K.map (g.comp f) :=
ext' $ image_image _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma map_le_iff_le_comap {f : G →* N} {K : subgroup G} {H : subgroup N} :
K.map f ≤ H ↔ K ≤ H.comap f :=
image_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma gc_map_comap (f : G →* N) : galois_connection (map f) (comap f) :=
λ _ _, map_le_iff_le_comap
@[to_additive]
lemma map_sup (H K : subgroup G) (f : G →* N) : (H ⊔ K).map f = H.map f ⊔ K.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
@[to_additive]
lemma map_supr {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → subgroup G) :
(supr s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_supr
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_inf (H K : subgroup N) (f : G →* N) : (H ⊓ K).comap f = H.comap f ⊓ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_infi {ι : Sort*} (f : G →* N) (s : ι → subgroup N) :
(infi s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_infi
@[simp, to_additive] lemma map_bot (f : G →* N) : (⊥ : subgroup G).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[simp, to_additive] lemma comap_top (f : G →* N) : (⊤ : subgroup N).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
/-- Given `subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod "Given `add_subgroup`s `H`, `K` of `add_group`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `add_subgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : subgroup G) (K : subgroup N) : subgroup (G × N) :=
{ inv_mem' := λ _ hx, ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩,
.. submonoid.prod H.to_submonoid K.to_submonoid}
@[to_additive coe_prod]
lemma coe_prod (H : subgroup G) (K : subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : set (G × N)) = (H : set G).prod (K : set N) := rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
lemma mem_prod {H : subgroup G} {K : subgroup N} {p : G × N} :
p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K := iff.rfl
@[to_additive prod_mono]
lemma prod_mono : ((≤) ⇒ (≤) ⇒ (≤)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
λ s s' hs t t' ht, set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
lemma prod_mono_right (K : subgroup G) : monotone (λ t : subgroup N, K.prod t) :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
lemma prod_mono_left (H : subgroup N) : monotone (λ K : subgroup G, K.prod H) :=
λ s₁ s₂ hs, prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
lemma prod_top (K : subgroup G) :
K.prod (⊤ : subgroup N) = K.comap (monoid_hom.fst G N) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_prod, monoid_hom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
lemma top_prod (H : subgroup N) :
(⊤ : subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (monoid_hom.snd G N) :=
ext $ λ x, by simp [mem_prod, monoid_hom.coe_snd]
@[simp, to_additive top_prod_top]
lemma top_prod_top : (⊤ : subgroup G).prod (⊤ : subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans $ comap_top _
@[to_additive] lemma bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : subgroup G).prod (⊥ : subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
ext' $ by simp [coe_prod, prod.one_eq_mk]
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prod_equiv "Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prod_equiv (H : subgroup G) (K : subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ map_mul' := λ x y, rfl, .. equiv.set.prod ↑H ↑K }
/-- A subgroup is normal if whenever `n ∈ H`, then `g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H` for every `g : G` -/
structure normal : Prop :=
(conj_mem : ∀ n, n ∈ H → ∀ g : G, g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H)
attribute [class] normal
end subgroup
namespace add_subgroup
/-- An add_subgroup is normal if whenever `n ∈ H`, then `g + n - g ∈ H` for every `g : G` -/
structure normal (H : add_subgroup A) : Prop :=
(conj_mem [] : ∀ n, n ∈ H → ∀ g : A, g + n - g ∈ H)
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.normal] subgroup.normal
attribute [class] normal
end add_subgroup
namespace subgroup
variables {H K : subgroup G}
@[instance, priority 100, to_additive]
lemma normal_of_comm {G : Type*} [comm_group G] (H : subgroup G) : H.normal :=
⟨by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm]⟩
namespace normal
variable nH : H.normal
@[to_additive] lemma mem_comm {a b : G} (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H :=
have a⁻¹ * (a * b) * a⁻¹⁻¹ ∈ H, from nH.conj_mem (a * b) h a⁻¹, by simpa
@[to_additive] lemma mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a * b ∈ H ↔ b * a ∈ H :=
⟨nH.mem_comm, nH.mem_comm⟩
end normal
@[instance, priority 100, to_additive]
lemma bot_normal : normal (⊥ : subgroup G) := ⟨by simp⟩
variable (G)
/-- The center of a group `G` is the set of elements that commute with everything in `G` -/
@[to_additive "The center of a group `G` is the set of elements that commute with everything in `G`"]
def center : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := {z | ∀ g, g * z = z * g},
one_mem' := by simp,
mul_mem' := λ a b (ha : ∀ g, g * a = a * g) (hb : ∀ g, g * b = b * g) g,
by assoc_rw [ha, hb g],
inv_mem' := λ a (ha : ∀ g, g * a = a * g) g,
by rw [← inv_inj, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv, ← ha, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv] }
variable {G}
@[to_additive] lemma mem_center_iff {z : G} : z ∈ center G ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g := iff.rfl
@[instance, priority 100, to_additive]
lemma center_normal : (center G).normal :=
⟨begin
assume n hn g h,
assoc_rw [hn (h * g), hn g],
simp
end⟩
variables {G} (H)
/-- The `normalizer` of `H` is the smallest subgroup of `G` inside which `H` is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The `normalizer` of `H` is the smallest subgroup of `G` inside which `H` is normal."]
def normalizer : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := {g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H},
one_mem' := by simp,
mul_mem' := λ a b (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ H) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ H) n,
by { rw [hb, ha], simp [mul_assoc] },
inv_mem' := λ a (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ H) n,
by { rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)], simp [mul_assoc] } }
-- variant for sets.
-- TODO should this replace `normalizer`?
/-- The `set_normalizer` of `S` is the subgroup of `G` whose elements satisfy `g*S*g⁻¹=S` -/
@[to_additive "The `set_normalizer` of `S` is the subgroup of `G` whose elements satisfy `g+S-g=S`."]
def set_normalizer (S : set G) : subgroup G :=
{ carrier := {g : G | ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ S},
one_mem' := by simp,
mul_mem' := λ a b (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ S) (hb : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ b * n * b⁻¹ ∈ S) n,
by { rw [hb, ha], simp [mul_assoc] },
inv_mem' := λ a (ha : ∀ n, n ∈ S ↔ a * n * a⁻¹ ∈ S) n,
by { rw [ha (a⁻¹ * n * a⁻¹⁻¹)], simp [mul_assoc] } }
variable {H}
@[to_additive] lemma mem_normalizer_iff {g : G} :
g ∈ normalizer H ↔ ∀ n, n ∈ H ↔ g * n * g⁻¹ ∈ H := iff.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma le_normalizer : H ≤ normalizer H :=
λ x xH n, by rw [H.mul_mem_cancel_right (H.inv_mem xH), H.mul_mem_cancel_left xH]
@[instance, priority 100, to_additive]
lemma normal_in_normalizer : (H.comap H.normalizer.subtype).normal :=
⟨λ x xH g, by simpa using (g.2 x).1 xH⟩
open_locale classical
@[to_additive] lemma le_normalizer_of_normal (hK : (H.comap K.subtype).normal) (HK : H ≤ K) : K ≤ H.normalizer :=
λ x hx y, ⟨λ yH, hK.conj_mem ⟨y, HK yH⟩ yH ⟨x, hx⟩,
λ yH, by simpa [mem_comap, mul_assoc] using
hK.conj_mem ⟨x * y * x⁻¹, HK yH⟩ yH ⟨x⁻¹, K.inv_mem hx⟩⟩
end subgroup
namespace group
variables {s : set G}
/-- Given an element `a`, `conjugates a` is the set of conjugates. -/
def conjugates (a : G) : set G := {b | is_conj a b}
lemma mem_conjugates_self {a : G} : a ∈ conjugates a := is_conj_refl _
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugates_of_set s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugates_of_set (s : set G) : set G := ⋃ a ∈ s, conjugates a
lemma mem_conjugates_of_set_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugates_of_set s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, is_conj a x :=
set.mem_bUnion_iff
theorem subset_conjugates_of_set : s ⊆ conjugates_of_set s :=
λ (x : G) (h : x ∈ s), mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.2 ⟨x, h, is_conj_refl _⟩
theorem conjugates_of_set_mono {s t : set G} (h : s ⊆ t) :
conjugates_of_set s ⊆ conjugates_of_set t :=
set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left h
lemma conjugates_subset_normal {N : subgroup G} (tn : N.normal) {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugates a ⊆ N :=
by { rintros a ⟨c, rfl⟩, exact tn.conj_mem a h c }
theorem conjugates_of_set_subset {s : set G} {N : subgroup G} (hN : N.normal) (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugates_of_set s ⊆ N :=
set.bUnion_subset (λ x H, conjugates_subset_normal hN (h H))
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
lemma conj_mem_conjugates_of_set {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugates_of_set s → (c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugates_of_set s) :=
λ H,
begin
rcases (mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.1 H) with ⟨a,h₁,h₂⟩,
exact mem_conjugates_of_set_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, is_conj_trans h₂ ⟨c,rfl⟩⟩,
end
end group
namespace subgroup
open group
variable {s : set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normal_closure (s : set G) : subgroup G := closure (conjugates_of_set s)
theorem conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure : conjugates_of_set s ⊆ normal_closure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normal_closure : s ⊆ normal_closure s :=
set.subset.trans subset_conjugates_of_set conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
@[instance] lemma normal_closure_normal : (normal_closure s).normal :=
⟨λ n h g,
begin
refine subgroup.closure_induction h (λ x hx, _) _ (λ x y ihx ihy, _) (λ x ihx, _),
{ exact (conjugates_of_set_subset_normal_closure (conj_mem_conjugates_of_set hx)) },
{ simpa using (normal_closure s).one_mem },
{ rw ← conj_mul,
exact mul_mem _ ihx ihy },
{ rw ← conj_inv,
exact inv_mem _ ihx }
end⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normal_closure_le_normal {N : subgroup G} (hN : N.normal)
(h : s ⊆ N) : normal_closure s ≤ N :=
begin
assume a w,
refine closure_induction w (λ x hx, _) _ (λ x y ihx ihy, _) (λ x ihx, _),
{ exact (conjugates_of_set_subset hN h hx) },
{ exact subgroup.one_mem _ },
{ exact subgroup.mul_mem _ ihx ihy },
{ exact subgroup.inv_mem _ ihx }
end
lemma normal_closure_subset_iff {N : subgroup G} (hN : N.normal) : s ⊆ N ↔ normal_closure s ≤ N :=
⟨normal_closure_le_normal hN, set.subset.trans (subset_normal_closure)⟩
theorem normal_closure_mono {s t : set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normal_closure s ≤ normal_closure t :=
normal_closure_le_normal normal_closure_normal (set.subset.trans h subset_normal_closure)
theorem normal_closure_eq_infi : normal_closure s =
⨅ (N : subgroup G) (h : normal N) (hs : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi (λ N, le_infi (λ hN, le_infi (normal_closure_le_normal hN))))
(infi_le_of_le (normal_closure s) (infi_le_of_le (by apply_instance)
(infi_le_of_le subset_normal_closure (le_refl _))))
end subgroup
namespace add_subgroup
open set
lemma gsmul_mem (H : add_subgroup A) {x : A} (hx : x ∈ H) :
∀ n : ℤ, gsmul n x ∈ H
| (int.of_nat n) := add_submonoid.nsmul_mem H.to_add_submonoid hx n
| -[1+ n] := H.neg_mem' $ H.add_mem hx $ add_submonoid.nsmul_mem H.to_add_submonoid hx n
lemma sub_mem (H : add_subgroup A) {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x - y ∈ H :=
H.add_mem hx (H.neg_mem hy)
/-- The `add_subgroup` generated by an element of an `add_group` equals the set of
natural number multiples of the element. -/
lemma mem_closure_singleton {x y : A} :
y ∈ closure ({x} : set A) ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, gsmul n x = y :=
begin
refine ⟨λ hy, closure_induction hy _ _ _ _,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ gsmul_mem _ (subset_closure $ mem_singleton x) n⟩,
{ intros y hy,
rw [eq_of_mem_singleton hy],
exact ⟨1, one_gsmul x⟩ },
{ exact ⟨0, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨n + m, add_gsmul x n m⟩ },
{ rintros _ ⟨n, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨-n, neg_gsmul x n⟩ }
end
variable (H : add_subgroup A)
@[simp] lemma coe_smul (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((nsmul n x : H) : A) = nsmul n x :=
coe_subtype H ▸ add_monoid_hom.map_nsmul _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_gsmul (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((n •ℤ x : H) : A) = n •ℤ x :=
coe_subtype H ▸ add_monoid_hom.map_gsmul _ _ _
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.coe_smul] subgroup.coe_pow
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.coe_gsmul] subgroup.coe_gpow
end add_subgroup
namespace monoid_hom
variables {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [group N] [group P] (K : subgroup G)
open subgroup
/-- The range of a monoid homomorphism from a group is a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive "The range of an `add_monoid_hom` from an `add_group` is an `add_subgroup`."]
def range (f : G →* N) : subgroup N :=
subgroup.copy ((⊤ : subgroup G).map f) (set.range f) (by simp [set.ext_iff])
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_range (f : G →* N) :
(f.range : set N) = set.range f := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mem_range {f : G →* N} {y : N} :
y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
iff.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma range_eq_map (f : G →* N) : f.range = (⊤ : subgroup G).map f :=
by ext; simp
/-- The canonical surjective group homomorphism `G →* f(G)` induced by a group
homomorphism `G →* N`. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical surjective `add_group` homomorphism `G →+ f(G)` induced by a group
homomorphism `G →+ N`."]
def to_range (f : G →* N) : G →* f.range :=
monoid_hom.mk' (λ g, ⟨f g, ⟨g, rfl⟩⟩) $ λ a b, by {ext, exact f.map_mul' _ _}
@[to_additive]
lemma map_range (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : f.range.map g = (g.comp f).range :=
by rw [range_eq_map, range_eq_map]; exact (⊤ : subgroup G).map_map g f
@[to_additive]
lemma range_top_iff_surjective {N} [group N] {f : G →* N} :
f.range = (⊤ : subgroup N) ↔ function.surjective f :=
subgroup.ext'_iff.trans $ iff.trans (by rw [coe_range, coe_top]) set.range_iff_surjective
/-- The range of a surjective monoid homomorphism is the whole of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive "The range of a surjective `add_monoid` homomorphism is the whole of the codomain."]
lemma range_top_of_surjective {N} [group N] (f : G →* N) (hf : function.surjective f) :
f.range = (⊤ : subgroup N) :=
range_top_iff_surjective.2 hf
/-- Restriction of a group hom to a subgroup of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive "Restriction of an `add_group` hom to an `add_subgroup` of the codomain."]
def cod_restrict (f : G →* N) (S : subgroup N) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : G →* S :=
{ to_fun := λ n, ⟨f n, h n⟩,
map_one' := subtype.eq f.map_one,
map_mul' := λ x y, subtype.eq (f.map_mul x y) }
/-- The multiplicative kernel of a monoid homomorphism is the subgroup of elements `x : G` such that
`f x = 1` -/
@[to_additive "The additive kernel of an `add_monoid` homomorphism is the `add_subgroup` of elements
such that `f x = 0`"]
def ker (f : G →* N) := (⊥ : subgroup N).comap f
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_ker (f : G →* N) {x : G} : x ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = 1 := iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma comap_ker (g : N →* P) (f : G →* N) : g.ker.comap f = (g.comp f).ker := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma to_range_ker (f : G →* N) : ker (to_range f) = ker f :=
begin
ext,
change (⟨f x, _⟩ : range f) = ⟨1, _⟩ ↔ f x = 1,
simp only [],
end
/-- The subgroup of elements `x : G` such that `f x = g x` -/
@[to_additive "The additive subgroup of elements `x : G` such that `f x = g x`"]
def eq_locus (f g : G →* N) : subgroup G :=
{ inv_mem' := λ x (hx : f x = g x), show f x⁻¹ = g x⁻¹, by rw [f.map_inv, g.map_inv, hx],
.. eq_mlocus f g}
/-- If two monoid homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its subgroup closure. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_on_closure {f g : G →* N} {s : set G} (h : set.eq_on f g s) :
set.eq_on f g (closure s) :=
show closure s ≤ f.eq_locus g, from (closure_le _).2 h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_eq_on_top {f g : G →* N} (h : set.eq_on f g (⊤ : subgroup G)) :
f = g :=
ext $ λ x, h trivial
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_eq_on_dense {s : set G} (hs : closure s = ⊤) {f g : G →* N} (h : s.eq_on f g) :
f = g :=
eq_of_eq_on_top $ hs ▸ eq_on_closure h
@[to_additive]
lemma gclosure_preimage_le (f : G →* N) (s : set N) :
closure (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (closure s).comap f :=
(closure_le _).2 $ λ x hx, by rw [mem_coe, mem_comap]; exact subset_closure hx
/-- The image under a monoid homomorphism of the subgroup generated by a set equals the subgroup
generated by the image of the set. -/
@[to_additive "The image under an `add_monoid` hom of the `add_subgroup` generated by a set equals
the `add_subgroup` generated by the image of the set."]
lemma map_closure (f : G →* N) (s : set G) :
(closure s).map f = closure (f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ le_trans (closure_mono $ set.subset_preimage_image f s)
(gclosure_preimage_le _ _))
((closure_le _).2 $ set.image_subset _ subset_closure)
end monoid_hom
namespace monoid_hom
variables {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [group G₁] [group G₂] [group G₃]
variables (f : G₁ →* G₂)
/-- `lift_of_surjective f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`lift_of_surjective_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` is surjective (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `lift_of_surjective_eq` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive "`lift_of_surjective f hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`lift_of_surjective_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` is surjective (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `lift_of_surjective_eq` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
noncomputable def lift_of_surjective
(hf : function.surjective f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ :=
{ to_fun := λ b, g (classical.some (hf b)),
map_one' := hg (classical.some_spec (hf 1)),
map_mul' :=
begin
intros x y,
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul],
simp only [classical.some_spec (hf _)],
end }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma lift_of_surjective_comp_apply
(hf : function.surjective f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) :
(f.lift_of_surjective hf g hg) (f x) = g x :=
begin
dsimp [lift_of_surjective],
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker],
apply hg,
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one],
simp only [classical.some_spec (hf _)],
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma lift_of_surjective_comp (hf : function.surjective f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
(f.lift_of_surjective hf g hg).comp f = g :=
by { ext, simp only [comp_apply, lift_of_surjective_comp_apply] }
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_lift_of_surjective (hf : function.surjective f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker)
(h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = (f.lift_of_surjective hf g hg) :=
begin
ext b, rcases hf b with ⟨a, rfl⟩,
simp only [← comp_apply, hh, f.lift_of_surjective_comp],
end
end monoid_hom
variables {N : Type*} [group N]
@[to_additive]
lemma subgroup.normal.comap {H : subgroup N} (hH : H.normal) (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).normal :=
⟨λ _, by simp [subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem] {contextual := tt}⟩
@[instance, priority 100, to_additive] lemma subgroup.normal_comap {H : subgroup N}
[nH : H.normal] (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).normal := nH.comap _
@[instance, priority 100, to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.normal_ker (f : G →* N) : f.ker.normal :=
by rw [monoid_hom.ker]; apply_instance
namespace subgroup
/-- The subgroup generated by an element. -/
def gpowers (g : G) : subgroup G :=
subgroup.copy (gpowers_hom G g).range (set.range ((^) g : ℤ → G)) rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_gpowers (g : G) : g ∈ gpowers g := ⟨1, gpow_one _⟩
lemma gpowers_eq_closure (g : G) : gpowers g = closure {g} :=
by { ext, exact mem_closure_singleton.symm }
@[simp] lemma range_gpowers_hom (g : G) : (gpowers_hom G g).range = gpowers g := rfl
lemma gpowers_subset {a : G} {K : subgroup G} (h : a ∈ K) : gpowers a ≤ K :=
λ x hx, match x, hx with _, ⟨i, rfl⟩ := K.gpow_mem h i end
end subgroup
namespace add_subgroup
/-- The subgroup generated by an element. -/
def gmultiples (a : A) : add_subgroup A :=
add_subgroup.copy (gmultiples_hom A a).range (set.range ((•ℤ a) : ℤ → A)) rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_gmultiples (a : A) : a ∈ gmultiples a := ⟨1, one_gsmul _⟩
lemma gmultiples_eq_closure (a : A) : gmultiples a = closure {a} :=
by { ext, exact mem_closure_singleton.symm }
@[simp] lemma range_gmultiples_hom (a : A) : (gmultiples_hom A a).range = gmultiples a := rfl
lemma gmultiples_subset {a : A} {B : add_subgroup A} (h : a ∈ B) : gmultiples a ≤ B :=
@subgroup.gpowers_subset (multiplicative A) _ _ (B.to_subgroup) h
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.gmultiples] subgroup.gpowers
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.mem_gmultiples] subgroup.mem_gpowers
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.gmultiples_eq_closure] subgroup.gpowers_eq_closure
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.range_gmultiples_hom] subgroup.range_gpowers_hom
attribute [to_additive add_subgroup.gmultiples_subset] subgroup.gpowers_subset
end add_subgroup
namespace mul_equiv
variables {H K : subgroup G}
/-- Makes the identity isomorphism from a proof two subgroups of a multiplicative
group are equal. -/
@[to_additive "Makes the identity additive isomorphism from a proof
two subgroups of an additive group are equal."]
def subgroup_congr (h : H = K) : H ≃* K :=
{ map_mul' := λ _ _, rfl, ..equiv.set_congr $ subgroup.ext'_iff.1 h }
end mul_equiv
-- TODO : ↥(⊤ : subgroup H) ≃* H ?
|
0eabeb2a7a5ee60fff38e4e44ed1164a4287d589 | 8930e38ac0fae2e5e55c28d0577a8e44e2639a6d | /logic/basic.lean | 84d1de98bd60e41fd8ea085d617ef1ccb415e30a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | SG4316/mathlib | 3d64035d02a97f8556ad9ff249a81a0a51a3321a | a7846022507b531a8ab53b8af8a91953fceafd3a | refs/heads/master | 1,584,869,960,527 | 1,530,718,645,000 | 1,530,724,110,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,825 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace "decidable".
Classical versions are in the namespace "classical".
Note: in the presence of automation, this whole file may be unnecessary. On the other hand,
maybe it is useful for writing automation.
-/
import data.prod tactic.interactive
/-
miscellany
TODO: move elsewhere
-/
section miscellany
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
def empty.elim {C : Sort*} : empty → C.
instance : subsingleton empty := ⟨λa, a.elim⟩
instance : decidable_eq empty := λa, a.elim
@[priority 0] instance decidable_eq_of_subsingleton
{α} [subsingleton α] : decidable_eq α
| a b := is_true (subsingleton.elim a b)
/- Add an instance to "undo" coercion transitivity into a chain of coercions, because
most simp lemmas are stated with respect to simple coercions and will not match when
part of a chain. -/
@[simp] theorem coe_coe {α β γ} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_t β γ]
(a : α) : (a : γ) = (a : β) := rfl
end miscellany
/-
propositional connectives
-/
@[simp] theorem false_ne_true : false ≠ true
| h := h.symm ▸ trivial
section propositional
variables {a b c d : Prop}
/- implies -/
theorem iff_of_eq (e : a = b) : a ↔ b := e ▸ iff.rfl
theorem iff_iff_eq : (a ↔ b) ↔ a = b := ⟨propext, iff_of_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem imp_self : (a → a) ↔ true := iff_true_intro id
theorem imp_intro {α β} (h : α) (h₂ : β) : α := h
theorem imp_false : (a → false) ↔ ¬ a := iff.rfl
theorem imp_and_distrib {α} : (α → b ∧ c) ↔ (α → b) ∧ (α → c) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ ha, (h ha).left, λ ha, (h ha).right⟩,
λ h ha, ⟨h.left ha, h.right ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem and_imp : (a ∧ b → c) ↔ (a → b → c) :=
iff.intro (λ h ha hb, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) (λ h ⟨ha, hb⟩, h ha hb)
theorem iff_def : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (b → a) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _
theorem iff_def' : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b → a) ∧ (a → b) :=
iff_def.trans and.comm
@[simp] theorem imp_true_iff {α : Sort*} : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ_, trivial
@[simp] theorem imp_iff_right (ha : a) : (a → b) ↔ b :=
⟨λf, f ha, imp_intro⟩
/- not -/
theorem not.elim {α : Sort*} (H1 : ¬a) (H2 : a) : α := absurd H2 H1
@[reducible] theorem not.imp {a b : Prop} (H2 : ¬b) (H1 : a → b) : ¬a := mt H1 H2
theorem not_not_of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → ¬¬a :=
mt not.elim
theorem not_of_not_imp {α} : ¬(α → b) → ¬b :=
mt imp_intro
theorem dec_em (p : Prop) [decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p := decidable.em p
theorem by_contradiction {p} [decidable p] : (¬p → false) → p :=
decidable.by_contradiction
@[simp] theorem not_not [decidable a] : ¬¬a ↔ a :=
iff.intro by_contradiction not_not_intro
theorem of_not_not [decidable a] : ¬¬a → a :=
by_contradiction
theorem of_not_imp [decidable a] (h : ¬ (a → b)) : a :=
by_contradiction (not_not_of_not_imp h)
theorem not.imp_symm [decidable a] (h : ¬a → b) (hb : ¬b) : a :=
by_contradiction $ hb ∘ h
theorem not_imp_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬a → b) ↔ (¬b → a) :=
⟨not.imp_symm, not.imp_symm⟩
theorem imp.swap : (a → b → c) ↔ (b → a → c) :=
⟨function.swap, function.swap⟩
theorem imp_not_comm : (a → ¬b) ↔ (b → ¬a) :=
imp.swap
/- and -/
theorem not_and_of_not_left (b : Prop) : ¬a → ¬(a ∧ b) :=
mt and.left
theorem not_and_of_not_right (a : Prop) {b : Prop} : ¬b → ¬(a ∧ b) :=
mt and.right
theorem and.imp_left (h : a → b) : a ∧ c → b ∧ c :=
and.imp h id
theorem and.imp_right (h : a → b) : c ∧ a → c ∧ b :=
and.imp id h
lemma and.right_comm : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∧ b :=
by simp [and.left_comm, and.comm]
lemma and.rotate : a ∧ b ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c ∧ a :=
by simp [and.left_comm, and.comm]
theorem and_not_self_iff (a : Prop) : a ∧ ¬ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume h, (h.right) (h.left)) (assume h, h.elim)
theorem not_and_self_iff (a : Prop) : ¬ a ∧ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨hna, ha⟩, hna ha) false.elim
theorem and_iff_left_of_imp {a b : Prop} (h : a → b) : (a ∧ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (λ ha, ⟨ha, h ha⟩)
theorem and_iff_right_of_imp {a b : Prop} (h : b → a) : (a ∧ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro and.right (λ hb, ⟨h hb, hb⟩)
/- or -/
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_of_imp (h₁ : a ∨ b) (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → d) : c ∨ d :=
or.imp h₂ h₃ h₁
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_left (h₁ : a ∨ c) (h : a → b) : b ∨ c :=
or.imp_left h h₁
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_right (h₁ : c ∨ a) (h : a → b) : c ∨ b :=
or.imp_right h h₁
theorem or.elim3 (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
or.elim h ha (assume h₂, or.elim h₂ hb hc)
theorem or_imp_distrib : (a ∨ b → c) ↔ (a → c) ∧ (b → c) :=
⟨assume h, ⟨assume ha, h (or.inl ha), assume hb, h (or.inr hb)⟩,
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, or.rec ha hb⟩
theorem or_iff_not_imp_left [decidable a] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ a → b) :=
⟨or.resolve_left, λ h, dite _ or.inl (or.inr ∘ h)⟩
theorem or_iff_not_imp_right [decidable b] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ b → a) :=
or.comm.trans or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem not_imp_not [decidable a] : (¬ a → ¬ b) ↔ (b → a) :=
⟨assume h hb, by_contradiction $ assume na, h na hb, mt⟩
/- distributivity -/
theorem and_or_distrib_left : a ∧ (b ∨ c) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (a ∧ c) :=
⟨λ ⟨ha, hbc⟩, hbc.imp (and.intro ha) (and.intro ha),
or.rec (and.imp_right or.inl) (and.imp_right or.inr)⟩
theorem or_and_distrib_right : (a ∨ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∨ (b ∧ c) :=
(and.comm.trans and_or_distrib_left).trans (or_congr and.comm and.comm)
theorem or_and_distrib_left : a ∨ (b ∧ c) ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ c) :=
⟨or.rec (λha, and.intro (or.inl ha) (or.inl ha)) (and.imp or.inr or.inr),
and.rec $ or.rec (imp_intro ∘ or.inl) (or.imp_right ∘ and.intro)⟩
theorem and_or_distrib_right : (a ∧ b) ∨ c ↔ (a ∨ c) ∧ (b ∨ c) :=
(or.comm.trans or_and_distrib_left).trans (and_congr or.comm or.comm)
/- iff -/
theorem iff_of_true (ha : a) (hb : b) : a ↔ b :=
⟨λ_, hb, λ _, ha⟩
theorem iff_of_false (ha : ¬a) (hb : ¬b) : a ↔ b :=
⟨ha.elim, hb.elim⟩
theorem iff_true_left (ha : a) : (a ↔ b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ h, h.1 ha, iff_of_true ha⟩
theorem iff_true_right (ha : a) : (b ↔ a) ↔ b :=
iff.comm.trans (iff_true_left ha)
theorem iff_false_left (ha : ¬a) : (a ↔ b) ↔ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, mt h.2 ha, iff_of_false ha⟩
theorem iff_false_right (ha : ¬a) : (b ↔ a) ↔ ¬b :=
iff.comm.trans (iff_false_left ha)
theorem not_or_of_imp [decidable a] (h : a → b) : ¬ a ∨ b :=
if ha : a then or.inr (h ha) else or.inl ha
theorem imp_iff_not_or [decidable a] : (a → b) ↔ (¬ a ∨ b) :=
⟨not_or_of_imp, or.neg_resolve_left⟩
theorem imp_or_distrib [decidable a] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
by simp [imp_iff_not_or, or.comm, or.left_comm]
theorem imp_or_distrib' [decidable b] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
by by_cases b; simp [h, or_iff_right_of_imp ((∘) false.elim)]
theorem not_imp_of_and_not : a ∧ ¬ b → ¬ (a → b)
| ⟨ha, hb⟩ h := hb $ h ha
@[simp] theorem not_imp [decidable a] : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨of_not_imp h, not_of_not_imp h⟩, not_imp_of_and_not⟩
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) [decidable a] : ((a → b) → a) → a :=
if ha : a then λ h, ha else λ h, h ha.elim
theorem peirce' {a : Prop} (H : ∀ b : Prop, (a → b) → a) : a := H _ id
theorem not_iff_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬ a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (a ↔ b) :=
by rw [@iff_def (¬ a), @iff_def' a]; exact and_congr not_imp_not not_imp_not
theorem not_iff_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬ a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ b ↔ a) :=
by rw [@iff_def (¬ a), @iff_def (¬ b)]; exact and_congr not_imp_comm imp_not_comm
theorem iff_not_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬ a) :=
by rw [@iff_def a, @iff_def b]; exact and_congr imp_not_comm not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_and_not_right [decidable b] : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ (a → b) :=
⟨λ h ha, h.imp_symm $ and.intro ha, λ h ⟨ha, hb⟩, hb $ h ha⟩
@[inline] def decidable_of_iff (a : Prop) (h : a ↔ b) [D : decidable a] : decidable b :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff D h
@[inline] def decidable_of_iff' (b : Prop) (h : a ↔ b) [D : decidable b] : decidable a :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff D h.symm
def decidable_of_bool : ∀ (b : bool) (h : b ↔ a), decidable a
| tt h := is_true (h.1 rfl)
| ff h := is_false (mt h.2 bool.ff_ne_tt)
/- de morgan's laws -/
theorem not_and_of_not_or_not (h : ¬ a ∨ ¬ b) : ¬ (a ∧ b)
| ⟨ha, hb⟩ := or.elim h (absurd ha) (absurd hb)
theorem not_and_distrib [decidable a] : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, if ha : a then or.inr (λ hb, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) else or.inl ha, not_and_of_not_or_not⟩
theorem not_and_distrib' [decidable b] : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, if hb : b then or.inl (λ ha, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) else or.inr hb, not_and_of_not_or_not⟩
@[simp] theorem not_and : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ (a → ¬ b) := and_imp
theorem not_and' : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ b → ¬a :=
not_and.trans imp_not_comm
theorem not_or_distrib : ¬ (a ∨ b) ↔ ¬ a ∧ ¬ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ ha, h (or.inl ha), λ hb, h (or.inr hb)⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h, or.elim h h₁ h₂⟩
theorem or_iff_not_and_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : a ∨ b ↔ ¬ (¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
by rw [← not_or_distrib, not_not]
theorem and_iff_not_or_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : a ∧ b ↔ ¬ (¬ a ∨ ¬ b) :=
by rw [← not_and_distrib, not_not]
end propositional
/- equality -/
section equality
variables {α : Sort*} {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem heq_iff_eq : a == b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_heq, heq_of_eq⟩
theorem proof_irrel_heq {p q : Prop} (e : p = q) (hp : p) (hq : q) : hp == hq :=
by subst q; refl
theorem ne_of_mem_of_not_mem {α β} [has_mem α β] {s : β} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ s) : b ∉ s → a ≠ b :=
mt $ λ e, e ▸ h
theorem eq_equivalence : equivalence (@eq α) :=
⟨eq.refl, @eq.symm _, @eq.trans _⟩
end equality
/-
quantifiers
-/
section quantifiers
variables {α : Sort*} {p q : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
def Exists.imp := @exists_imp_exists
theorem forall_swap {α β} {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨function.swap, function.swap⟩
theorem exists_swap {α β} {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨λ ⟨x, y, h⟩, ⟨y, x, h⟩, λ ⟨y, x, h⟩, ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_imp_distrib : ((∃ x, p x) → b) ↔ ∀ x, p x → b :=
⟨λ h x hpx, h ⟨x, hpx⟩, λ h ⟨x, hpx⟩, h x hpx⟩
--theorem forall_not_of_not_exists (h : ¬ ∃ x, p x) : ∀ x, ¬ p x :=
--forall_imp_of_exists_imp h
theorem not_exists_of_forall_not (h : ∀ x, ¬ p x) : ¬ ∃ x, p x :=
exists_imp_distrib.2 h
@[simp] theorem not_exists : (¬ ∃ x, p x) ↔ ∀ x, ¬ p x :=
exists_imp_distrib
theorem not_forall_of_exists_not : (∃ x, ¬ p x) → ¬ ∀ x, p x
| ⟨x, hn⟩ h := hn (h x)
theorem not_forall {p : α → Prop}
[decidable (∃ x, ¬ p x)] [∀ x, decidable (p x)] :
(¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬ p x :=
⟨not.imp_symm $ λ nx x, nx.imp_symm $ λ h, ⟨x, h⟩,
not_forall_of_exists_not⟩
@[simp] theorem not_forall_not [decidable (∃ x, p x)] :
(¬ ∀ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
by haveI := decidable_of_iff (¬ ∃ x, p x) not_exists;
exact not_iff_comm.1 not_exists
@[simp] theorem not_exists_not [∀ x, decidable (p x)] :
(¬ ∃ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem forall_true_iff : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ _, trivial)
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ true) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ _, of_iff_true (h _))
@[simp] theorem forall_2_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → true) ↔ true :=
forall_true_iff' $ λ _, forall_true_iff
@[simp] theorem forall_3_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : Π a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ a (b : β a), γ a b → true) ↔ true :=
forall_true_iff' $ λ _, forall_2_true_iff
@[simp] theorem forall_const (α : Sort*) [inhabited α] : (α → b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ h, h (arbitrary α), λ hb x, hb⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_const (α : Sort*) [inhabited α] : (∃ x : α, b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ ⟨x, h⟩, h, λ h, ⟨arbitrary α, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_and_distrib : (∀ x, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ (∀ x, q x) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ x, (h x).left, λ x, (h x).right⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ x, ⟨h₁ x, h₂ x⟩⟩
theorem exists_or_distrib : (∃ x, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∨ (∃ x, q x) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hpq⟩, hpq.elim (λ hpx, or.inl ⟨x, hpx⟩) (λ hqx, or.inr ⟨x, hqx⟩),
λ hepq, hepq.elim (λ ⟨x, hpx⟩, ⟨x, or.inl hpx⟩) (λ ⟨x, hqx⟩, ⟨x, or.inr hqx⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_and_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃x, q ∧ p x) ↔ q ∧ (∃x, p x) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hq, hp⟩, ⟨hq, x, hp⟩, λ ⟨hq, x, hp⟩, ⟨x, hq, hp⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_and_distrib_right {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃x, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃x, p x) ∧ q :=
by simp [and_comm]
@[simp] theorem forall_eq {a' : α} : (∀a, a = a' → p a) ↔ p a' :=
⟨λ h, h a' rfl, λ h a e, e.symm ▸ h⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq {a' : α} : ∃ a, a = a' := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left {a' : α} : (∃ a, a = a' ∧ p a) ↔ p a' :=
⟨λ ⟨a, e, h⟩, e ▸ h, λ h, ⟨_, rfl, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right {a' : α} : (∃ a, p a ∧ a = a') ↔ p a' :=
(exists_congr $ by exact λ a, and.comm).trans exists_eq_left
@[simp] theorem forall_eq' {a' : α} : (∀a, a' = a → p a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left' {a' : α} : (∃ a, a' = a ∧ p a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right' {a' : α} : (∃ a, p a ∧ a' = a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall (h : b ∨ ∀x, p x) (x) : b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right $ λ h₂, h₂ x
theorem forall_or_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [decidable q] :
(∀x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ (∀x, p x) :=
⟨λ h, if hq : q then or.inl hq else or.inr $ λ x, (h x).resolve_left hq,
forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_prop {p q : Prop} : (∃ h : p, q) ↔ p ∧ q :=
⟨λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_false : ¬ (∃a:α, false) := assume ⟨a, h⟩, h
theorem Exists.fst {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ := h
theorem Exists.snd {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ := h
@[simp] theorem forall_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∀ h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@forall_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∃ h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@exists_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (hn : ¬ p) : (∀ h' : p, q h') ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ h, hn.elim h
@[simp] theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬ p → ¬ (∃ h' : p, q h') :=
mt Exists.fst
end quantifiers
/- classical versions -/
namespace classical
variables {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
protected theorem not_forall : (¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ (∃ x, ¬ p x) := not_forall
protected theorem forall_or_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ (∀x, p x) :=
forall_or_distrib_left
theorem cases {p : Prop → Prop} (h1 : p true) (h2 : p false) : ∀a, p a :=
assume a, cases_on a h1 h2
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬ p :=
by_cases or.inl or.inr
protected theorem or_iff_not_imp_left {p q : Prop} : p ∨ q ↔ (¬ p → q) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left
protected theorem or_iff_not_imp_right {p q : Prop} : q ∨ p ↔ (¬ p → q) :=
or_iff_not_imp_right
/- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open -/
noncomputable theorem dec (p : Prop) : decidable p := by apply_instance
noncomputable theorem dec_pred (p : α → Prop) : decidable_pred p := by apply_instance
noncomputable theorem dec_rel (p : α → α → Prop) : decidable_rel p := by apply_instance
noncomputable theorem dec_eq (α : Sort*) : decidable_eq α := by apply_instance
@[elab_as_eliminator]
noncomputable def {u} rec_on {C : Sort u} (h : ∃ a, p a) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
H (classical.some h) (classical.some_spec h)
end classical
/-
bounded quantifiers
-/
section bounded_quantifiers
variables {α : Sort*} {r p q : α → Prop} {P Q : ∀ x, p x → Prop} {b : Prop}
theorem bex_def : (∃ x (h : p x), q x) ↔ ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨λ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, ⟨x, px, qx⟩, λ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, ⟨x, px, qx⟩⟩
theorem bex.elim {b : Prop} : (∃ x h, P x h) → (∀ a h, P a h → b) → b
| ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩ h' := h' a h₁ h₂
theorem bex.intro (a : α) (h₁ : p a) (h₂ : P a h₁) : ∃ x (h : p x), P x h :=
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ball_congr (H : ∀ x h, P x h ↔ Q x h) :
(∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∀ x h, Q x h) :=
forall_congr $ λ x, forall_congr (H x)
theorem bex_congr (H : ∀ x h, P x h ↔ Q x h) :
(∃ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, Q x h) :=
exists_congr $ λ x, exists_congr (H x)
theorem ball.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, (P x h → Q x h))
(h₁ : ∀ x h, P x h) (x h) : Q x h :=
H _ _ $ h₁ _ _
theorem bex.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, (P x h → Q x h)) :
(∃ x h, P x h) → ∃ x h, Q x h
| ⟨x, h, h'⟩ := ⟨_, _, H _ _ h'⟩
theorem ball.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x)
(h₁ : ∀ x, q x → r x) (x) (h : p x) : r x :=
h₁ _ $ H _ h
theorem bex.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(∃ x (_ : p x), r x) → ∃ x (_ : q x), r x
| ⟨x, hp, hr⟩ := ⟨x, H _ hp, hr⟩
theorem ball_of_forall (h : ∀ x, p x) (x) (_ : q x) : p x :=
h x
theorem forall_of_ball (H : ∀ x, p x) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) (x) : q x :=
h x $ H x
theorem bex_of_exists (H : ∀ x, p x) : (∃ x, q x) → ∃ x (_ : p x), q x
| ⟨x, hq⟩ := ⟨x, H x, hq⟩
theorem exists_of_bex : (∃ x (_ : p x), q x) → ∃ x, q x
| ⟨x, _, hq⟩ := ⟨x, hq⟩
@[simp] theorem bex_imp_distrib : ((∃ x h, P x h) → b) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h → b) :=
by simp
theorem not_bex : (¬ ∃ x h, P x h) ↔ ∀ x h, ¬ P x h :=
bex_imp_distrib
theorem not_ball_of_bex_not : (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) → ¬ ∀ x h, P x h
| ⟨x, h, hp⟩ al := hp $ al x h
theorem not_ball [decidable (∃ x h, ¬ P x h)] [∀ x h, decidable (P x h)] :
(¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) :=
⟨not.imp_symm $ λ nx x h, nx.imp_symm $ λ h', ⟨x, h, h'⟩,
not_ball_of_bex_not⟩
theorem ball_true_iff (p : α → Prop) : (∀ x, p x → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ h hrx, trivial)
theorem ball_and_distrib : (∀ x h, P x h ∧ Q x h) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h) ∧ (∀ x h, Q x h) :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ x, forall_and_distrib) forall_and_distrib
theorem bex_or_distrib : (∃ x h, P x h ∨ Q x h) ↔ (∃ x h, P x h) ∨ (∃ x h, Q x h) :=
iff.trans (exists_congr $ λ x, exists_or_distrib) exists_or_distrib
end bounded_quantifiers
namespace classical
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
theorem not_ball {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {P : Π (x : α), p x → Prop} :
(¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) := _root_.not_ball
end classical
section nonempty
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : α → Type w}
attribute [simp] nonempty_of_inhabited
lemma exists_true_iff_nonempty {α : Sort*} : (∃a:α, true) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (λ⟨a, _⟩, ⟨a⟩) (λ⟨a⟩, ⟨a, trivial⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Prop {p : Prop} : nonempty p ↔ p :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨h⟩, h) (assume h, ⟨h⟩)
lemma not_nonempty_iff_imp_false {p : Prop} : ¬ nonempty α ↔ α → false :=
⟨λ h a, h ⟨a⟩, λ h ⟨a⟩, h a⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_sigma : nonempty (Σa:α, γ a) ↔ (∃a:α, nonempty (γ a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩) (assume ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_subtype {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : nonempty (subtype p) ↔ (∃a:α, p a) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, ⟨a, h⟩) (assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_prod : nonempty (α × β) ↔ (nonempty α ∧ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩) (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_pprod {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} :
nonempty (pprod α β) ↔ (nonempty α ∧ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩) (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_sum : nonempty (α ⊕ β) ↔ (nonempty α ∨ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨h⟩, match h with sum.inl a := or.inl ⟨a⟩ | sum.inr b := or.inr ⟨b⟩ end)
(assume h, match h with or.inl ⟨a⟩ := ⟨sum.inl a⟩ | or.inr ⟨b⟩ := ⟨sum.inr b⟩ end)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_psum {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} :
nonempty (psum α β) ↔ (nonempty α ∨ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨h⟩, match h with psum.inl a := or.inl ⟨a⟩ | psum.inr b := or.inr ⟨b⟩ end)
(assume h, match h with or.inl ⟨a⟩ := ⟨psum.inl a⟩ | or.inr ⟨b⟩ := ⟨psum.inr b⟩ end)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_psigma {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} :
nonempty (psigma β) ↔ (∃a:α, nonempty (β a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩) (assume ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_empty : ¬ nonempty empty :=
assume ⟨h⟩, h.elim
@[simp] lemma nonempty_ulift : nonempty (ulift α) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, ⟨a⟩) (assume ⟨a⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_plift {α : Sort u} : nonempty (plift α) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, ⟨a⟩) (assume ⟨a⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty.forall {α : Sort u} {p : nonempty α → Prop} :
(∀h:nonempty α, p h) ↔ (∀a, p ⟨a⟩) :=
iff.intro (assume h a, h _) (assume h ⟨a⟩, h _)
@[simp] lemma nonempty.exists {α : Sort u} {p : nonempty α → Prop} :
(∃h:nonempty α, p h) ↔ (∃a, p ⟨a⟩) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩, ⟨a, h⟩) (assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩)
lemma classical.nonempty_pi {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} :
nonempty (Πa:α, β a) ↔ (∀a:α, nonempty (β a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨f⟩ a, ⟨f a⟩) (assume f, ⟨assume a, classical.choice $ f a⟩)
end nonempty
|
14fb781e052f3158f9544ab725c7f3d5f4cfb516 | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/data/list/basic.lean | 1b32bcf240a24d317bfa55df0a082e067afb3c0b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 186,359 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.order_functions
import control.monad.basic
import data.nat.choose.basic
import order.rel_classes
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
open function nat
namespace list
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
attribute [inline] list.head
instance : is_left_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ nil_append ⟩
instance : is_right_id (list α) has_append.append [] :=
⟨ append_nil ⟩
instance : is_associative (list α) has_append.append :=
⟨ append_assoc ⟩
theorem cons_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ [].
theorem cons_ne_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a::l ≠ l :=
mt (congr_arg length) (nat.succ_ne_self _)
theorem head_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → h₁ = h₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pheq)
theorem tail_eq_of_cons_eq {h₁ h₂ : α} {t₁ t₂ : list α} :
(h₁::t₁) = (h₂::t₂) → t₁ = t₂ :=
assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (assume Pheq Pteq, Pteq)
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : injective (cons a) :=
assume l₁ l₂, assume Pe, tail_eq_of_cons_eq Pe
theorem cons_inj (a : α) {l l' : list α} : a::l = a::l' ↔ l = l' :=
cons_injective.eq_iff
theorem exists_cons_of_ne_nil {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) : ∃ b L, l = b :: L :=
by { induction l with c l', contradiction, use [c,l'], }
/-! ### mem -/
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ [a] := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] → a = b :=
assume : a ∈ [b], or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, this)
(assume : a ∈ [], absurd this (not_mem_nil a))
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∈ [b] ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton, or.inl⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ b::l → b ∈ l → a ∈ l :=
assume ainbl binl, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbl)
(assume : a = b, begin subst a, exact binl end)
(assume : a ∈ l, this)
theorem eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l) :=
classical.by_cases or.inl $ assume : a ≠ b, h.elim or.inl $ assume h, or.inr ⟨this, h⟩
theorem not_mem_append {a : α} {s t : list α} (h₁ : a ∉ s) (h₂ : a ∉ t) : a ∉ s ++ t :=
mt mem_append.1 $ not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : l ≠ [] :=
by intro e; rw e at h; cases h
theorem mem_split {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ s t : list α, l = s ++ a :: t :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {cases h}, rcases h with rfl | h,
{ exact ⟨[], l, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih h with ⟨s, t, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b::s, t, rfl⟩ }
end
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ≠ y) (h₂ : a ∈ y :: l) : a ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₂) (λe, absurd e h₁) (λr, r)
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
theorem not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ≠ y → a ∉ l → a ∉ y::l :=
assume p1 p2, not.intro (assume Pain, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pain) (not_or p1 p2))
theorem ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a y : α} {l : list α} : a ∉ y::l → a ≠ y ∧ a ∉ l :=
assume p, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons p) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons p)
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : f a ∈ map f l :=
begin
induction l with b l' ih,
{cases h},
{rcases h with rfl | h,
{exact or.inl rfl},
{exact or.inr (ih h)}}
end
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} (h : b ∈ map f l) :
∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
begin
induction l with c l' ih,
{cases h},
{cases (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) with h h,
{exact ⟨c, mem_cons_self _ _, h.symm⟩},
{rcases ih h with ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩,
exact ⟨a, mem_cons_of_mem _ ha₁, ha₂⟩ }}
end
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : list α} : b ∈ map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map, λ ⟨a, la, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact mem_map_of_mem f la⟩
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : injective f) {a : α} {l : list α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ m, let ⟨a', m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m in H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
lemma forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : list α} {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ l.map f, P i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ l, P (f j) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H j hj,
exact H (f j) (mem_map_of_mem f hj) },
{ assume H i hi,
rcases mem_map.1 hi with ⟨j, hj, ji⟩,
rw ← ji,
exact H j hj }
end
@[simp] lemma map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} : list.map f l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨by cases l; simp only [forall_prop_of_true, map, forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff],
λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a : α} : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, a ∈ join L ↔ ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l
| [] := ⟨false.elim, λ⟨_, h, _⟩, false.elim h⟩
| (c :: L) := by simp only [join, mem_append, @mem_join L, mem_cons_iff, or_and_distrib_right,
exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left]
theorem exists_of_mem_join {a : α} {L : list (list α)} : a ∈ join L → ∃ l, l ∈ L ∧ a ∈ l :=
mem_join.1
theorem mem_join_of_mem {a : α} {L : list (list α)} {l} (lL : l ∈ L) (al : a ∈ l) : a ∈ join L :=
mem_join.2 ⟨l, lL, al⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} : b ∈ list.bind l f ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
iff.trans mem_join
⟨λ ⟨l', h1, h2⟩, let ⟨a, al, fa⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h1 in ⟨a, al, fa.symm ▸ h2⟩,
λ ⟨a, al, bfa⟩, ⟨f a, mem_map_of_mem _ al, bfa⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} :
b ∈ list.bind l f → ∃ a ∈ l, b ∈ f a :=
mem_bind.1
theorem mem_bind_of_mem {b : β} {l : list α} {f : α → list β} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (h : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ list.bind l f :=
mem_bind.2 ⟨a, al, h⟩
lemma bind_map {g : α → list β} {f : β → γ} :
∀(l : list α), list.map f (l.bind g) = l.bind (λa, (g a).map f)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [cons_bind, map_append, bind_map l]
/-! ### length -/
theorem length_eq_zero {l : list α} : length l = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
⟨eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero, λ h, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_singleton (a : α) : length [a] = 1 := rfl
theorem length_pos_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, a ∈ l → 0 < length l
| (b::l) _ := zero_lt_succ _
theorem exists_mem_of_length_pos : ∀ {l : list α}, 0 < length l → ∃ a, a ∈ l
| (b::l) _ := ⟨b, mem_cons_self _ _⟩
theorem length_pos_iff_exists_mem {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l :=
⟨exists_mem_of_length_pos, λ ⟨a, h⟩, length_pos_of_mem h⟩
theorem ne_nil_of_length_pos {l : list α} : 0 < length l → l ≠ [] :=
λ h1 h2, lt_irrefl 0 ((length_eq_zero.2 h2).subst h1)
theorem length_pos_of_ne_nil {l : list α} : l ≠ [] → 0 < length l :=
λ h, pos_iff_ne_zero.2 $ λ h0, h $ length_eq_zero.1 h0
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : list α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem length_eq_one {l : list α} : length l = 1 ↔ ∃ a, l = [a] :=
⟨match l with [a], _ := ⟨a, rfl⟩ end, λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma exists_of_length_succ {n} :
∀ l : list α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [] H := absurd H.symm $ succ_ne_zero n
| (h :: t) H := ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : injective (list.length : list α → ℕ) ↔ subsingleton α :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, refine ⟨λ x y, _⟩, suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, refl },
{ intros hα l1 l2 hl, induction l1 generalizing l2; cases l2,
{ refl }, { cases hl }, { cases hl },
congr, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _, apply l1_ih, simpa using hl }
end
@[simp] lemma length_injective [subsingleton α] : injective (length : list α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr $ by apply_instance
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
lemma empty_eq : (∅ : list α) = [] := by refl
lemma singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : list α) = [x] := rfl
lemma insert_neg [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∉ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
if_neg h
lemma insert_pos [decidable_eq α] {x : α} {l : list α} (h : x ∈ l) :
has_insert.insert x l = l :=
if_pos h
lemma doubleton_eq [decidable_eq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : list α) = [x, y] :=
by { rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq], rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton] }
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ∀ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem forall_mem_cons : ∀ {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α},
(∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
ball_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x :=
(forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem forall_mem_singleton {p : α → Prop} {a : α} : (∀ x ∈ [a], p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq]
theorem forall_mem_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ++ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem not_exists_mem_nil (p : α → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x ∈ @nil α, p x.
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : list α) (h : p a) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.intro a (mem_cons_self _ _) h
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ l, p x) :
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xl px, bex.intro x (mem_cons_of_mem _ xl) px)
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
bex.elim h (λ x xal px,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal)
(assume : x = a, begin rw ←this, left, exact px end)
(assume : x ∈ l, or.inr (bex.intro x this px)))
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : list α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons
(assume h, or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists)
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l l₁ l₂ : list α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁++l₂ :=
λ s, subset.trans s $ subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {l m : list α} :
a::l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m :=
by simp only [subset_def, mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : list α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
λ a h, (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
@[simp] theorem append_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, simp only [subset_def] at *, split; intros; simp* },
{ rintro ⟨h1, h2⟩, apply append_subset_of_subset_of_subset h1 h2 }
end
theorem eq_nil_of_subset_nil : ∀ {l : list α}, l ⊆ [] → l = []
| [] s := rfl
| (a::l) s := false.elim $ s $ mem_cons_self a l
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : list α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l :=
show l = [] ↔ l ⊆ [], from ⟨λ e, e ▸ subset.refl _, eq_nil_of_subset_nil⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
λ x, by simp only [mem_map, not_and, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp]; exact λ a h e, ⟨a, H h, e⟩
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (f : α → β) (h : injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_subset f⟩, intros h2 x hx,
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩,
cases h hxx', exact hx'
end
/-! ### append -/
lemma append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : list α} : list.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma singleton_append {x : α} {l : list α} : [x] ++ l = x :: l := rfl
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left (s t : list α) : s ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
theorem append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right (s t : list α) : t ≠ [] → s ++ t ≠ [] :=
by induction s; intros; contradiction
@[simp] lemma append_eq_nil {p q : list α} : (p ++ q) = [] ↔ p = [] ∧ q = [] :=
by cases p; simp only [nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, false_and]
@[simp] lemma nil_eq_append_iff {a b : list α} : [] = a ++ b ↔ a = [] ∧ b = [] :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_nil]
lemma append_eq_cons_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
a ++ b = x :: c ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by cases a; simp only [and_assoc, @eq_comm _ c, nil_append, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true,
true_and, false_and, exists_false, false_or, or_false, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left']
lemma cons_eq_append_iff {a b c : list α} {x : α} :
(x :: c : list α) = a ++ b ↔ (a = [] ∧ b = x :: c) ∨ (∃a', a = x :: a' ∧ c = a' ++ b) :=
by rw [eq_comm, append_eq_cons_iff]
lemma append_eq_append_iff {a b c d : list α} :
a ++ b = c ++ d ↔ (∃a', c = a ++ a' ∧ b = a' ++ d) ∨ (∃c', a = c ++ c' ∧ d = c' ++ b) :=
begin
induction a generalizing c,
case nil { rw nil_append, split,
{ rintro rfl, left, exact ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨a', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a', H, rfl⟩), {refl}, {rw [← append_assoc, ← H], refl} } },
case cons : a as ih {
cases c,
{ simp only [cons_append, nil_append, false_and, exists_false, false_or, exists_eq_left'],
exact eq_comm },
{ simp only [cons_append, @eq_comm _ a, ih, and_assoc, and_or_distrib_left,
exists_and_distrib_left] } }
end
@[simp] theorem split_at_eq_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), split_at n l = (take n l, drop n l)
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := by simp only [split_at, split_at_eq_take_drop n xs, take, drop]
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
| 0 a := rfl
| (succ n) [] := rfl
| (succ n) (x :: xs) := congr_arg (cons x) $ take_append_drop n xs
-- TODO(Leo): cleanup proof after arith dec proc
theorem append_inj :
∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
| [] [] t₁ t₂ h hl := ⟨rfl, h⟩
| (a::s₁) [] t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl
| [] (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm
| (a::s₁) (b::s₂) t₁ t₂ h hl := list.no_confusion h $ λab hap,
let ⟨e1, e2⟩ := @append_inj s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ hap (succ.inj hl) in
by rw [ab, e1, e2]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem append_inj_right {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj h hl).left
theorem append_inj' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length t₁ = length t₂) :
s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj h $ @nat.add_right_cancel _ (length t₁) _ $
let hap := congr_arg length h in by simp only [length_append] at hap; rwa [← hl] at hap
theorem append_inj_right' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).right
theorem append_inj_left' {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂)
(hl : length t₁ = length t₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_inj' h hl).left
theorem append_left_cancel {s t₁ t₂ : list α} (h : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
append_inj_right h rfl
theorem append_right_cancel {s₁ s₂ t : list α} (h : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t) : s₁ = s₂ :=
append_inj_left' h rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : list α) : function.injective (λ t, s ++ t) :=
λ t₁ t₂, append_left_cancel
theorem append_right_inj {t₁ t₂ : list α} (s) : s ++ t₁ = s ++ t₂ ↔ t₁ = t₂ :=
(append_right_injective s).eq_iff
theorem append_left_injective (t : list α) : function.injective (λ s, s ++ t) :=
λ s₁ s₂, append_right_cancel
theorem append_left_inj {s₁ s₂ : list α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
(append_left_injective t).eq_iff
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α → β} {l : list α} {s₁ s₂ : list β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = s₁ ∧ map f l₂ = s₂ :=
begin
have := h, rw [← take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this ⊢,
rw map_append at this,
refine ⟨_, _, rfl, append_inj this _⟩,
rw [length_map, length_take, min_eq_left],
rw [← length_map f l, h, length_append],
apply nat.le_add_right
end
/-! ### repeat -/
@[simp] theorem repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n + 1) = a :: repeat a n := rfl
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} : ∀ {n}, b ∈ repeat a n → b = a
| (n+1) h := or.elim h id $ @eq_of_mem_repeat _
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ b ∈ l, b = a) → l = repeat a l.length
| [] H := rfl
| (b::l) H := by cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂;
unfold length repeat; congr; [exact H₁, exact eq_repeat_of_mem H₂]
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {l : list α} : l = repeat a l.length ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat, eq_repeat_of_mem⟩
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : l = repeat a n ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨length_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_add (a : α) (m n) : repeat a (m + n) = repeat a m ++ repeat a n :=
by induction m; simp only [*, zero_add, succ_add, repeat]; split; refl
theorem repeat_subset_singleton (a : α) (n) : repeat a n ⊆ [a] :=
λ b h, mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_repeat h)
@[simp] theorem map_const (l : list α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) l = repeat b l.length :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
by rw map_const at h; exact eq_of_mem_repeat h
@[simp] theorem map_repeat (f : α → β) (a : α) (n) : map f (repeat a n) = repeat (f a) n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, map]]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem tail_repeat (a : α) (n) : tail (repeat a n) = repeat a n.pred :=
by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem join_repeat_nil (n : ℕ) : join (repeat [] n) = @nil α :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat, join, append_nil]]
/-! ### pure -/
@[simp] theorem mem_pure {α} (x y : α) :
x ∈ (pure y : list α) ↔ x = y := by simp! [pure,list.ret]
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp] theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → list β) (l : list α) :
l >>= f = l.bind f := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_append (f : α → list β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).bind f = l₁.bind f ++ l₂.bind f :=
append_bind _ _ _
@[simp] theorem bind_singleton (f : α → list β) (x : α) : [x].bind f = f x :=
append_nil (f x)
/-! ### concat -/
theorem concat_nil (a : α) : concat [] a = [a] := rfl
theorem concat_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : concat (a :: l) b = a :: concat l b := rfl
@[simp] theorem concat_eq_append (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = l ++ [a] :=
by induction l; simp only [*, concat]; split; refl
theorem init_eq_of_concat_eq {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : concat l₁ a = concat l₂ a → l₁ = l₂ :=
begin
intro h,
rw [concat_eq_append, concat_eq_append] at h,
exact append_right_cancel h
end
theorem last_eq_of_concat_eq {a b : α} {l : list α} : concat l a = concat l b → a = b :=
begin
intro h,
rw [concat_eq_append, concat_eq_append] at h,
exact head_eq_of_cons_eq (append_left_cancel h)
end
theorem concat_ne_nil (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a ≠ [] :=
by simp
theorem concat_append (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : concat l₁ a ++ l₂ = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ :=
by simp
theorem length_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : length (concat l a) = succ (length l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, length_append, length]
theorem append_concat (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ++ concat l₂ a = concat (l₁ ++ l₂) a :=
by simp
/-! ### reverse -/
@[simp] theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@nil α) = [] := rfl
local attribute [simp] reverse_core
@[simp] theorem reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = reverse l ++ [a] :=
have aux : ∀ l₁ l₂, reverse_core l₁ l₂ ++ [a] = reverse_core l₁ (l₂ ++ [a]),
by intro l₁; induction l₁; intros; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, cons_append]],
(aux l nil).symm
theorem reverse_core_eq (l₁ l₂ : list α) : reverse_core l₁ l₂ = reverse l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by induction l₁ generalizing l₂; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_core, reverse_cons, append_assoc]];
refl
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : list α) : reverse (a::l) = concat (reverse l) a :=
by simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_append (s t : list α) : reverse (s ++ t) = (reverse t) ++ (reverse s) :=
by induction s; [rw [nil_append, reverse_nil, append_nil],
simp only [*, cons_append, reverse_cons, append_assoc]]
theorem reverse_concat (l : list α) (a : α) : reverse (concat l a) = a :: reverse l :=
by rw [concat_eq_append, reverse_append, reverse_singleton, singleton_append]
@[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (l : list α) : reverse (reverse l) = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, reverse_append]]; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_involutive : involutive (@reverse α) :=
λ l, reverse_reverse l
@[simp] theorem reverse_injective : injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
@[simp] theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem reverse_eq_nil {l : list α} : reverse l = [] ↔ l = [] :=
@reverse_inj _ l []
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem length_reverse (l : list α) : length (reverse l) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, length_append, length]]
@[simp] theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map, reverse_cons, map_append]]
theorem map_reverse_core (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
map f (reverse_core l₁ l₂) = reverse_core (map f l₁) (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [reverse_core_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ reverse l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, mem_cons_iff,
not_mem_nil, false_or, or_false, or_comm]]
@[simp] theorem reverse_repeat (a : α) (n) : reverse (repeat a n) = repeat a n :=
eq_repeat.2 ⟨by simp only [length_reverse, length_repeat],
λ b h, eq_of_mem_repeat (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
/-! ### is_nil -/
lemma is_nil_iff_eq_nil {l : list α} : l.is_nil ↔ l = [] :=
list.cases_on l (by simp [is_nil]) (by simp [is_nil])
/-! ### init -/
@[simp] theorem length_init : ∀ (l : list α), length (init l) = length l - 1
| [] := rfl
| [a] := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) :=
begin
rw init,
simp only [add_left_inj, length, succ_add_sub_one],
exact length_init (b :: l)
end
/-! ### last -/
@[simp] theorem last_cons {a : α} {l : list α} :
∀ (h₁ : a :: l ≠ nil) (h₂ : l ≠ nil), last (a :: l) h₁ = last l h₂ :=
by {induction l; intros, contradiction, reflexivity}
@[simp] theorem last_append {a : α} (l : list α) (h : l ++ [a] ≠ []) : last (l ++ [a]) h = a :=
by induction l;
[refl, simp only [cons_append, last_cons _ (λ H, cons_ne_nil _ _ (append_eq_nil.1 H).2), *]]
theorem last_concat {a : α} (l : list α) (h : concat l a ≠ []) : last (concat l a) h = a :=
by simp only [concat_eq_append, last_append]
@[simp] theorem last_singleton (a : α) (h : [a] ≠ []) : last [a] h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem last_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : list α) (h : a₁::a₂::l ≠ []) :
last (a₁::a₂::l) h = last (a₂::l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) := rfl
theorem init_append_last : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), init l ++ [last l h] = l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := rfl
| (a::b::l) h :=
begin
rw [init, cons_append, last_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _) (cons_ne_nil _ _)],
congr,
exact init_append_last (cons_ne_nil b l)
end
theorem last_congr {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
last l₁ h₁ = last l₂ h₂ :=
by subst l₁
theorem last_mem : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), last l h ∈ l
| [] h := absurd rfl h
| [a] h := or.inl rfl
| (a::b::l) h := or.inr $ by { rw [last_cons_cons], exact last_mem (cons_ne_nil b l) }
lemma last_repeat_succ (a m : ℕ) :
(repeat a m.succ).last (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ
(show (repeat a m.succ).length = m.succ, by rw length_repeat)) = a :=
begin
induction m with k IH,
{ simp },
{ simpa only [repeat_succ, last] }
end
/-! ### last' -/
@[simp] theorem last'_is_none :
∀ {l : list α}, (last' l).is_none ↔ l = []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_none (b::l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_is_some : ∀ {l : list α}, l.last'.is_some ↔ l ≠ []
| [] := by simp
| [a] := by simp
| (a::b::l) := by simp [@last'_is_some (b::l)]
theorem mem_last'_eq_last : ∀ {l : list α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.last' → ∃ h, x = last l h
| [] x hx := false.elim $ by simpa using hx
| [a] x hx := have a = x, by simpa using hx, this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| (a::b::l) x hx :=
begin
rw last' at hx,
rcases mem_last'_eq_last hx with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
use cons_ne_nil _ _,
rwa [last_cons]
end
theorem mem_of_mem_last' {l : list α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.last') : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_last'_eq_last ha in h₂.symm ▸ last_mem _
theorem init_append_last' : ∀ {l : list α} (a ∈ l.last'), init l ++ [a] = l
| [] a ha := (option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a] _ rfl := rfl
| (a :: b :: l) c hc := by { rw [last'] at hc, rw [init, cons_append, init_append_last' _ hc] }
theorem ilast_eq_last' [inhabited α] : ∀ l : list α, l.ilast = l.last'.iget
| [] := by simp [ilast, arbitrary]
| [a] := rfl
| [a, b] := rfl
| [a, b, c] := rfl
| (a :: b :: c :: l) := by simp [ilast, ilast_eq_last' (c :: l)]
@[simp] theorem last'_append_cons : ∀ (l₁ : list α) (a : α) (l₂ : list α),
last' (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = last' (a :: l₂)
| [] a l₂ := rfl
| [b] a l₂ := rfl
| (b::c::l₁) a l₂ := by rw [cons_append, cons_append, last', ← cons_append, last'_append_cons]
theorem last'_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : list α) : ∀ {l₂ : list α} (hl₂ : l₂ ≠ []),
last' (l₁ ++ l₂) = last' l₂
| [] hl₂ := by contradiction
| (b::l₂) _ := last'_append_cons l₁ b l₂
/-! ### head(') and tail -/
theorem head_eq_head' [inhabited α] (l : list α) : head l = (head' l).iget :=
by cases l; refl
theorem mem_of_mem_head' {x : α} : ∀ {l : list α}, x ∈ l.head' → x ∈ l
| [] h := (option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| (a::l) h := by { simp only [head', option.mem_def] at h, exact h ▸ or.inl rfl }
@[simp] theorem head_cons [inhabited α] (a : α) (l : list α) : head (a::l) = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_nil : tail (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tail (a::l) = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_append [inhabited α] (t : list α) {s : list α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head (s ++ t) = head s :=
by {induction s, contradiction, refl}
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : list α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] :=
by { induction l, contradiction, rw [tail,cons_append,tail], }
theorem cons_head'_tail : ∀ {l : list α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ head' l), a :: tail l = l
| [] a h := by contradiction
| (b::l) a h := by { simp at h, simp [h] }
theorem head_mem_head' [inhabited α] : ∀ {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []), head l ∈ head' l
| [] h := by contradiction
| (a::l) h := rfl
theorem cons_head_tail [inhabited α] {l : list α} (h : l ≠ []) : (head l)::(tail l) = l :=
cons_head'_tail (head_mem_head' h)
@[simp] theorem head'_map (f : α → β) (l) : head' (map f l) = (head' l).map f := by cases l; refl
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def reverse_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C [])
(H1 : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), C l → C (l ++ [a])) : C l :=
begin
rw ← reverse_reverse l,
induction reverse l,
{ exact H0 },
{ rw reverse_cons, exact H1 _ _ ih }
end
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
def bidirectional_rec {C : list α → Sort*}
(H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ (a : α), C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : ∀ l, C l
| [] := H0
| [a] := H1 a
| (a :: b :: l) :=
let l' := init (b :: l), b' := last (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) in
have length l' < length (a :: b :: l), by { change _ < length l + 2, simp },
begin
rw ←init_append_last (cons_ne_nil b l),
have : C l', from bidirectional_rec l',
exact Hn a l' b' ‹C l'›
end
using_well_founded { rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf list.length⟩] }
/-- Like `bidirectional_rec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator] def bidirectional_rec_on {C : list α → Sort*}
(l : list α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ (a : α), C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectional_rec H0 H1 Hn l
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : Π (l : list α), [] <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons _ _ a (nil_sublist l)
@[refl, simp] theorem sublist.refl : Π (l : list α), l <+ l
| [] := sublist.slnil
| (a :: l) := sublist.cons2 _ _ a (sublist.refl l)
@[trans] theorem sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ :=
sublist.rec_on h₂ (λ_ s, s)
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH l₁ h₁))
(λl₂ l₃ a h₂ IH l₁ h₁, @sublist.cases_on _ (λl₁ l₂', l₂' = a :: l₂ → l₁ <+ a :: l₃) _ _ h₁
(λ_, nil_sublist _)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end)
(λl₁ l₂' a' h₁' e, match a', l₂', e, h₁' with ._, ._, rfl, h₁ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ (IH _ h₁) end) rfl)
l₁ h₁
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : l <+ a::l :=
sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist.refl l)
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a::l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist.trans (sublist_cons a l₁)
theorem cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons2 _ _ _ s
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := cons_sublist_cons _ (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : Π (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₂ <+ l₁++l₂
| [] l₂ := sublist.refl _
| (a::l₁) l₂ := sublist.cons _ _ _ (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ a::l₂ :=
sublist.cons _ _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_left _ _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁++l₂ :=
s.trans $ sublist_append_right _ _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ {a : α}, a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ._ (sublist.cons ._ ._ a s) := sublist_of_cons_sublist s
| ._ (sublist.cons2 ._ ._ a s) := s
theorem cons_sublist_cons_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a::l₁ <+ a::l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons, cons_sublist_cons _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : ∀ l, l++l₁ <+ l++l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] := iff.rfl
| (a::l) := cons_sublist_cons_iff.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem sublist.append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l :=
begin
induction h with _ _ a _ ih _ _ a _ ih,
{ refl },
{ apply sublist_cons_of_sublist a ih },
{ apply cons_sublist_cons a ih }
end
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a::l₂) :
l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l₁ with b l₁ IH generalizing l,
{ cases h, { left, exact ‹l <+ l₂› }, { right, apply mem_cons_self } },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h _ _ _ h,
{ exact or.imp_left (sublist_cons_of_sublist _) (IH h) },
{ exact (IH h).imp (cons_sublist_cons _) (mem_cons_of_mem _) } }
end
theorem sublist.reverse {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse :=
begin
induction h with _ _ _ _ ih _ _ a _ ih, {refl},
{ rw reverse_cons, exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left ih },
{ rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons], exact ih.append_right [a] }
end
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l₁++l <+ l₂++l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist_iff]
using h.reverse,
λ h, h.append_right l⟩
theorem sublist.append {l₁ l₂ r₁ r₂ : list α}
(hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem sublist.subset : Π {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil b h := h
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) b h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) b h :=
match eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h with
| or.inl h := h ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
| or.inr h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (sublist.subset s h)
end
theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λ h, h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), λ h,
let ⟨s, t, e⟩ := mem_split h in e.symm ▸
(cons_sublist_cons _ (nil_sublist _)).trans (sublist_append_right _ _)⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil $ s.subset
theorem repeat_sublist_repeat (a : α) {m n} : repeat a m <+ repeat a n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [length_repeat] using length_le_of_sublist h,
λ h, by induction h; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sublist.cons]] ⟩
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| ._ ._ sublist.slnil h := rfl
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
absurd (length_le_of_sublist s) $ not_le_of_gt $ by rw h; apply lt_succ_self
| ._ ._ (sublist.cons2 l₁ l₂ a s) h :=
by rw [length, length] at h; injection h with h; rw eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s h
theorem eq_of_sublist_of_length_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq s (le_antisymm (length_le_of_sublist s) h)
theorem sublist.antisymm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s₁ (length_le_of_sublist s₂)
instance decidable_sublist [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true $ nil_sublist _
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λh, list.no_confusion $ eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist l₁ l₂) $
by rw [← h]; exact ⟨cons_sublist_cons _, sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons⟩
else decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (decidable_sublist (a::l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, λs, match a, l₁, s, h with
| a, l₁, sublist.cons ._ ._ ._ s', h := s'
| ._, ._, sublist.cons2 t ._ ._ s', h := absurd rfl h
end⟩
/-! ### index_of -/
section index_of
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nil (a : α) : index_of a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem index_of_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
index_of a (b::l) = if a = b then 0 else succ (index_of a l) := rfl
theorem index_of_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : list α) : a = b → index_of a (b::l) = 0 :=
assume e, if_pos e
@[simp] theorem index_of_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : index_of a (a::l) = 0 :=
index_of_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem index_of_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : list α) : a ≠ b → index_of a (b::l) = succ (index_of a l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem index_of_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _) },
simp only [length, mem_cons_iff, index_of_cons], split_ifs,
{ exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) (λ H, H $ or.inl h) },
{ simp only [h, false_or], rw ← ih, exact succ_inj' }
end
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem index_of_of_not_mem {l : list α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → index_of a l = length l :=
index_of_eq_length.2
theorem index_of_le_length {a : α} {l : list α} : index_of a l ≤ length l :=
begin
induction l with b l ih, {refl},
simp only [length, index_of_cons],
by_cases h : a = b, {rw if_pos h, exact nat.zero_le _},
rw if_neg h, exact succ_le_succ ih
end
theorem index_of_lt_length {a} {l : list α} : index_of a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨λh, by_contradiction $ λ al, ne_of_lt h $ index_of_eq_length.2 al,
λal, lt_of_le_of_ne index_of_le_length $ λ h, index_of_eq_length.1 h al⟩
end index_of
/-! ### nth element -/
theorem nth_le_of_mem : ∀ {a} {l : list α}, a ∈ l → ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a
| a (_ :: l) (or.inl rfl) := ⟨0, succ_pos _, rfl⟩
| a (b :: l) (or.inr m) :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem m in ⟨n+1, succ_lt_succ h, e⟩
theorem nth_le_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n} h, nth l n = some (nth_le l n h)
| (a :: l) 0 h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := @nth_le_nth l n _
theorem nth_len_le : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, length l ≤ n → nth l n = none
| [] n h := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := nth_len_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)
theorem nth_eq_some {l : list α} {n a} : nth l n = some a ↔ ∃ h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨λ e,
have h : n < length l, from lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn,
by rw nth_len_le hn at e; contradiction,
⟨h, by rw nth_le_nth h at e;
injection e with e; apply nth_le_mem⟩,
λ ⟨h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_nth _⟩
@[simp]
theorem nth_eq_none_iff : ∀ {l : list α} {n}, nth l n = none ↔ length l ≤ n :=
begin
intros, split,
{ intro h, by_contradiction h',
have h₂ : ∃ h, l.nth_le n h = l.nth_le n (lt_of_not_ge h') := ⟨lt_of_not_ge h', rfl⟩,
rw [← nth_eq_some, h] at h₂, cases h₂ },
{ solve_by_elim [nth_len_le] },
end
theorem nth_of_mem {a} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
let ⟨n, h, e⟩ := nth_le_of_mem h in ⟨n, by rw [nth_le_nth, e]⟩
theorem nth_le_mem : ∀ (l : list α) n h, nth_le l n h ∈ l
| (a :: l) 0 h := mem_cons_self _ _
| (a :: l) (n+1) h := mem_cons_of_mem _ (nth_le_mem l _ _)
theorem nth_mem {l : list α} {n a} (e : nth l n = some a) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨h, e⟩ := nth_eq_some.1 e in e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _
theorem mem_iff_nth_le {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nth_le l n h = a :=
⟨nth_le_of_mem, λ ⟨n, h, e⟩, e ▸ nth_le_mem _ _ _⟩
theorem mem_iff_nth {a} {l : list α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n, nth l n = some a :=
mem_iff_nth_le.trans $ exists_congr $ λ n, nth_eq_some.symm
lemma nth_zero (l : list α) : l.nth 0 = l.head' := by cases l; refl
lemma nth_injective {α : Type u} {xs : list α} {i j : ℕ}
(h₀ : i < xs.length)
(h₁ : nodup xs)
(h₂ : xs.nth i = xs.nth j) : i = j :=
begin
induction xs with x xs generalizing i j,
{ cases h₀ },
{ cases i; cases j,
case nat.zero nat.zero
{ refl },
case nat.succ nat.succ
{ congr, cases h₁,
apply xs_ih;
solve_by_elim [lt_of_succ_lt_succ] },
iterate 2
{ dsimp at h₂,
cases h₁ with _ _ h h',
cases h x _ rfl,
rw mem_iff_nth,
exact ⟨_, h₂.symm⟩ <|>
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩ } },
end
@[simp] theorem nth_map (f : α → β) : ∀ l n, nth (map f l) n = (nth l n).map f
| [] n := rfl
| (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| (a :: l) (n+1) := nth_map l n
theorem nth_le_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nth_le (map f l) n H1 = f (nth_le l n H2) :=
option.some.inj $ by rw [← nth_le_nth, nth_map, nth_le_nth]; refl
/-- A version of `nth_le_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem nth_le_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nth_le l n H) = nth_le (map f l) n ((length_map f l).symm ▸ H) :=
(nth_le_map f _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem nth_le_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nth_le (map f l) n H = f (nth_le l n (length_map f l ▸ H)) :=
nth_le_map f _ _
/-- If one has `nth_le L i hi` in a formula and `h : L = L'`, one can not `rw h` in the formula as
`hi` gives `i < L.length` and not `i < L'.length`. The lemma `nth_le_of_eq` can be used to make
such a rewrite, with `rw (nth_le_of_eq h)`. -/
lemma nth_le_of_eq {L L' : list α} (h : L = L') {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le L' i (h ▸ hi) :=
by { congr, exact h}
@[simp] lemma nth_le_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) :
nth_le [a] n hn = a :=
have hn0 : n = 0 := le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_lt_succ hn),
by subst hn0; refl
lemma nth_le_zero [inhabited α] {L : list α} (h : 0 < L.length) :
L.nth_le 0 h = L.head :=
by { cases L, cases h, simp, }
lemma nth_le_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn₁) (hn₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n hn₁ = l₁.nth_le n hn₂
| [] _ n hn₁ hn₂ := (not_lt_zero _ hn₂).elim
| (a::l) _ 0 hn₁ hn₂ := rfl
| (a::l) _ (n+1) hn₁ hn₂ := by simp only [nth_le, cons_append];
exact nth_le_append _ _
lemma nth_le_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}
(h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂ : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length) : n - l₁.length < l₂.length :=
begin
rw list.length_append at h₂,
convert (nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff h₁).mpr h₂,
simp,
end
lemma nth_le_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂),
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth_le n h₂ = l₂.nth_le (n - l₁.length) (nth_le_append_right_aux h₁ h₂)
| [] _ n h₁ h₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) _ (n+1) h₁ h₂ :=
begin
dsimp,
conv { to_rhs, congr, skip, rw [←nat.sub_sub, nat.sub.right_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel], },
rw nth_le_append_right (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₁),
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_repeat (a : α) {n m : ℕ} (h : m < (list.repeat a n).length) :
(list.repeat a n).nth_le m h = a :=
eq_of_mem_repeat (nth_le_mem _ _ _)
lemma nth_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₁.nth n :=
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := lt_of_lt_of_le hn
(by rw length_append; exact le_add_right _ _),
by rw [nth_le_nth hn, nth_le_nth hn', nth_le_append]
lemma nth_append_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ} (hn : l₁.length ≤ n) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nth n = l₂.nth (n - l₁.length) :=
begin
by_cases hl : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length,
{ rw [nth_le_nth hl, nth_le_nth, nth_le_append_right hn] },
{ rw [nth_len_le (le_of_not_lt hl), nth_len_le],
rw [not_lt, length_append] at hl,
exact nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le hl }
end
lemma last_eq_nth_le : ∀ (l : list α) (h : l ≠ []),
last l h = l.nth_le (l.length - 1) (sub_lt (length_pos_of_ne_nil h) one_pos)
| [] h := rfl
| [a] h := by rw [last_singleton, nth_le_singleton]
| (a :: b :: l) h := by { rw [last_cons, last_eq_nth_le (b :: l)],
refl, exact cons_ne_nil b l }
@[simp] lemma nth_concat_length : ∀ (l : list α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).nth l.length = some a
| [] a := rfl
| (b::l) a := by rw [cons_append, length_cons, nth, nth_concat_length]
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, (∀n, nth l₁ n = nth l₂ n) → l₁ = l₂
| [] [] h := rfl
| (a::l₁) [] h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| [] (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 := h 0; contradiction
| (a::l₁) (a'::l₂) h := by have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0; injection h0 with aa;
simp only [aa, ext (λn, h (n+1))]; split; refl
theorem ext_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀n h₁ h₂, nth_le l₁ n h₁ = nth_le l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext $ λn, if h₁ : n < length l₁
then by rw [nth_le_nth, nth_le_nth, h n h₁ (by rwa [← hl])]
else let h₁ := le_of_not_gt h₁ in by { rw [nth_len_le h₁, nth_len_le], rwa [←hl], }
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth_le [decidable_eq α] {a : α} :
∀ {l : list α} h, nth_le l (index_of a l) h = a
| (b::l) h := by by_cases h' : a = b;
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, index_of_cons, nth_le, @index_of_nth_le l]
@[simp] theorem index_of_nth [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
nth l (index_of a l) = some a :=
by rw [nth_le_nth, index_of_nth_le (index_of_lt_length.2 h)]
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux1 :
∀ (l r : list α) (i h1 h2), nth_le (reverse_core l r) (i + length l) h1 = nth_le r i h2
| [] r i := λh1 h2, rfl
| (a :: l) r i :=
by rw (show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l, from add_right_comm i (length l) 1);
exact λh1 h2, nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) (i+1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
lemma index_of_inj [decidable_eq α] {l : list α} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) : index_of x l = index_of y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, have nth_le l (index_of x l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hx) =
nth_le l (index_of y l) (index_of_lt_length.2 hy),
by simp only [h],
by simpa only [index_of_nth_le],
λ h, by subst h⟩
theorem nth_le_reverse_aux2 : ∀ (l r : list α) (i : nat) (h1) (h2),
nth_le (reverse_core l r) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2
| [] r i h1 h2 := absurd h2 (not_lt_zero _)
| (a :: l) r 0 h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux1 l (a :: r) 0,
rw zero_add at aux,
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
end
| (a :: l) r (i+1) h1 h2 := begin
have aux := nth_le_reverse_aux2 l (a :: r) i,
have heq := calc length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1)
= length l - (1 + i) : by rw add_comm; refl
... = length l - 1 - i : by rw nat.sub_sub,
rw [← heq] at aux,
apply aux
end
@[simp] theorem nth_le_reverse (l : list α) (i : nat) (h1 h2) :
nth_le (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nth_le l i h2 :=
nth_le_reverse_aux2 _ _ _ _ _
lemma eq_cons_of_length_one {l : list α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nth_le 0 (h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)] :=
begin
refine ext_le (by convert h) (λ n h₁ h₂, _),
simp only [nth_le_singleton],
congr,
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (nat.lt_succ_iff.mp h₂)
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail {f g : list α → list α} (m : ℕ) :
∀n (l:list α), (l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g (m + n) =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g m) n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail n l)
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le
{f g : list α → list α} (m n : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g m =
l.modify_nth_tail (λl, (f l).modify_nth_tail g (m - n)) n :=
begin
rcases le_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail]
end
lemma modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same {f g : list α → list α} (n : ℕ) (l:list α) :
(l.modify_nth_tail f n).modify_nth_tail g n = l.modify_nth_tail (g ∘ f) n :=
by rw [modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le n n l (le_refl n), nat.sub_self]; refl
lemma modify_nth_tail_id :
∀n (l:list α), l.modify_nth_tail id n = l
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (list.cons a) (modify_nth_tail_id n l)
theorem remove_nth_eq_nth_tail : ∀ n (l : list α), remove_nth l n = modify_nth_tail tail n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (remove_nth_eq_nth_tail _ _)
theorem update_nth_eq_modify_nth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
update_nth l n a = modify_nth (λ _, a) n l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons _) (update_nth_eq_modify_nth _ _)
theorem modify_nth_eq_update_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α),
modify_nth f n l = ((λ a, update_nth l n (f a)) <$> nth l n).get_or_else l
| 0 l := by cases l; refl
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (b::l) := (congr_arg (cons b)
(modify_nth_eq_update_nth n l)).trans $ by cases nth l n; refl
theorem nth_modify_nth (f : α → α) : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (modify_nth f n l) m = (λ a, if n = m then f a else a) <$> nth l m
| n l 0 := by cases l; cases n; refl
| n [] (m+1) := by cases n; refl
| 0 (a::l) (m+1) := by cases nth l m; refl
| (n+1) (a::l) (m+1) := (nth_modify_nth n l m).trans $
by cases nth l m with b; by_cases n = m;
simp only [h, if_pos, if_true, if_false, option.map_none, option.map_some, mt succ.inj,
not_false_iff]
theorem modify_nth_tail_length (f : list α → list α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth_tail f n l) = length l
| 0 l := H _
| (n+1) [] := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) := @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (+1) (modify_nth_tail_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem modify_nth_length (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, length (modify_nth f n l) = length l :=
modify_nth_tail_length _ (λ l, by cases l; refl)
@[simp] theorem update_nth_length (l : list α) (n) (a : α) :
length (update_nth l n a) = length l :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_length]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (modify_nth f n l) n = f <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem nth_modify_nth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (modify_nth f m l) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [nth_modify_nth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem nth_update_nth_eq (a : α) (n) (l : list α) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = (λ _, a) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_eq]
theorem nth_update_nth_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : list α} (h : n < length l) :
nth (update_nth l n a) n = some a :=
by rw [nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth h]; refl
theorem nth_update_nth_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : list α) (h : m ≠ n) :
nth (update_nth l m a) n = nth l n :=
by simp only [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, nth_modify_nth_ne _ _ h]
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_eq (l : list α) (i : ℕ) (a : α)
(h : i < (l.update_nth i a).length) : (l.update_nth i a).nth_le i h = a :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← nth_le_nth, nth_update_nth_eq, nth_le_nth]; simp * at *
@[simp] lemma nth_le_update_nth_of_ne {l : list α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.update_nth i a).length) :
(l.update_nth i a).nth_le j hj = l.nth_le j (by simpa using hj) :=
by rw [← option.some_inj, ← list.nth_le_nth, list.nth_update_nth_ne _ _ h, list.nth_le_nth]
lemma mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth : ∀ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ l.update_nth n b), a ∈ l ∨ a = b
| [] n a b h := false.elim h
| (c::l) 0 a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
or.inr (or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _)
| (c::l) (n+1) a b h := ((mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 h).elim
(λ h, h ▸ or.inl (mem_cons_self _ _))
(λ h, (mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth h).elim
(or.inl ∘ mem_cons_of_mem _) or.inr)
section insert_nth
variable {a : α}
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_nil (a : α) : insert_nth 0 a [] = [a] := rfl
@[simp] lemma insert_nth_succ_nil (n : ℕ) (a : α) : insert_nth (n + 1) a [] = [] := rfl
lemma length_insert_nth : ∀n as, n ≤ length as → length (insert_nth n a as) = length as + 1
| 0 as h := rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := congr_arg nat.succ $ length_insert_nth n as (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
lemma remove_nth_insert_nth (n:ℕ) (l : list α) : (l.insert_nth n a).remove_nth n = l :=
by rw [remove_nth_eq_nth_tail, insert_nth, modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same];
from modify_nth_tail_id _ _
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge : ∀n m as, n < length as → n ≤ m →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth (m + 1) a).remove_nth n
| 0 0 [] has _ := (lt_irrefl _ has).elim
| 0 0 (a::as) has hmn := by simp [remove_nth, insert_nth]
| 0 (m+1) (a::as) has hmn := rfl
| (n+1) (m+1) (a::as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_ge n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le : ∀n m as, n < length as → m ≤ n →
insert_nth m a (as.remove_nth n) = (as.insert_nth m a).remove_nth (n + 1)
| n 0 (a :: as) has hmn := rfl
| (n + 1) (m + 1) (a :: as) has hmn :=
congr_arg (cons a) $
insert_nth_remove_nth_of_le n m as (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ has) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hmn)
lemma insert_nth_comm (a b : α) :
∀(i j : ℕ) (l : list α) (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≤ length l),
(l.insert_nth i a).insert_nth (j + 1) b = (l.insert_nth j b).insert_nth i a
| 0 j l := by simp [insert_nth]
| (i + 1) 0 l := assume h, (nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
| (i + 1) (j+1) [] := by simp
| (i + 1) (j+1) (c::l) :=
assume h₀ h₁,
by simp [insert_nth];
exact insert_nth_comm i j l (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₁)
lemma mem_insert_nth {a b : α} : ∀ {n : ℕ} {l : list α} (hi : n ≤ l.length),
a ∈ l.insert_nth n b ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l
| 0 as h := iff.rfl
| (n+1) [] h := (nat.not_succ_le_zero _ h).elim
| (n+1) (a'::as) h := begin
dsimp [list.insert_nth],
erw [list.mem_cons_iff, mem_insert_nth (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h), list.mem_cons_iff,
← or.assoc, or_comm (a = a'), or.assoc]
end
end insert_nth
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] lemma map_nil (f : α → β) : map f [] = [] := rfl
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
map f l = foldr (λ a bs, f a :: bs) [] l :=
by induction l; simp *
lemma map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h in
by rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
lemma map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : list α} : map f l = map g l ↔ (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :=
begin
refine ⟨_, map_congr⟩, intros h x hx,
rw [mem_iff_nth_le] at hx, rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩,
rw [nth_le_map_rev f, nth_le_map_rev g], congr, exact h
end
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : list α) : map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]; split; refl
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : list α) : map f l = l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, map]]; split; refl
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : list α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero $ by rw [← length_map f l, h]; refl
@[simp] theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : list (list α)) :
map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) :
l.bind (list.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
by unfold list.bind; induction l; simp only [map, join, list.ret, cons_append, nil_append, *];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : list α) : f <$> l = map f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : injective (map f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
split; intros h x y hxy,
{ suffices : [x] = [y], { simpa using this }, apply h, simp [hxy] },
{ induction y generalizing x, simpa using hxy,
cases x, simpa using hxy, simp at hxy, simp [y_ih hxy.2, h hxy.1] }
end
/--
A single `list.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `list.map` with another `list.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `list.map_map`.
-/
lemma comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : list α) :
map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) := (map_map _ _ _).symm
/--
Composing a `list.map` with another `list.map` is equal to
a single `list.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp] lemma map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) :
map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) :=
by { ext l, rw comp_map }
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (as : list α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (λ a bs, if p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as :=
by { induction as, { refl }, { simp! [*, apply_ite (map f)] } }
lemma last_map (f : α → β) {l : list α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).last (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.last hl) :=
begin
induction l with l_ih l_tl l_ih,
{ apply (hl rfl).elim },
{ cases l_tl,
{ simp },
{ simpa using l_ih } }
end
/-! ### map₂ -/
theorem nil_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (l : list β) : map₂ f [] l = [] :=
by cases l; refl
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) (l : list α) : map₂ f l [] = [] :=
by cases l; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_flip (f : α → β → γ) :
∀ as bs, map₂ (flip f) bs as = map₂ f as bs
| [] [] := rfl
| [] (b :: bs) := rfl
| (a :: as) [] := rfl
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) := by { simp! [map₂_flip], refl }
/-! ### take, drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_zero (l : list α) : take 0 l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_nil : ∀ n, take n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
theorem take_cons (n) (a : α) (l : list α) : take (succ n) (a::l) = a :: take n l := rfl
@[simp] theorem take_length : ∀ (l : list α), take (length l) l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin change a :: (take (length l) l) = a :: l, rw take_length end
theorem take_all_of_le : ∀ {n} {l : list α}, length l ≤ n → take n l = l
| 0 [] h := rfl
| 0 (a::l) h := absurd h (not_le_of_gt (zero_lt_succ _))
| (n+1) [] h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h :=
begin
change a :: take n l = a :: l,
rw [take_all_of_le (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
end
@[simp] theorem take_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := congr_arg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take_left
theorem take_take : ∀ (n m) (l : list α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n 0 l := by rw [min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0 m l := by rw [zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| (succ n) (succ m) nil := by simp only [take_nil]
| (succ n) (succ m) (a::l) := by simp only [take, min_succ_succ, take_take n m l]; split; refl
theorem take_repeat (a : α) : ∀ (n m : ℕ), take n (repeat a m) = repeat a (min n m)
| n 0 := by simp
| 0 m := by simp
| (succ n) (succ m) := by simp [min_succ_succ, take_repeat]
lemma map_take {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).map f = (L.map f).take i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_take], }
lemma take_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ},
n ≤ l₁.length → (l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [list.take, list.cons_append, list.take, take_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Taking the first `l₁.length + i` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first
`i` elements of `l₂` to `l₁`. -/
lemma take_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
take (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ (take i l₂) :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, take_cons, l₁_ih, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
end
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_take (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
nth_le L i hi = nth_le (L.take j) i (by { rw length_take, exact lt_min hj hi }) :=
by { rw nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm hi, exact nth_le_append _ _ }
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_take' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < (L.take j).length) :
nth_le (L.take j) i hi = nth_le L i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi (by simp [le_refl])) :=
by { simp at hi, rw nth_le_take L _ hi.1 }
lemma nth_take {l : list α} {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) :
(l.take n).nth m = l.nth m :=
begin
induction n with n hn generalizing l m,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero] at h,
exact absurd h (not_lt_of_le m.zero_le) },
{ cases l with hd tl,
{ simp only [take_nil] },
{ cases m,
{ simp only [nth, take] },
{ simpa only using hn (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) } } },
end
@[simp] lemma nth_take_of_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
(l.take (n + 1)).nth n = l.nth n :=
nth_take (nat.lt_succ_self n)
lemma take_succ {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
l.take (n + 1) = l.take n ++ (l.nth n).to_list :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing n,
{ simp only [option.to_list, nth, take_nil, append_nil]},
{ cases n,
{ simp only [option.to_list, nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, take, nil_append] },
{ simp only [hl, cons_append, nth, eq_self_iff_true, and_self, take] } }
end
@[simp] theorem drop_nil : ∀ n, drop n [] = ([] : list α)
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := rfl
lemma mem_of_mem_drop {α} {n : ℕ} {l : list α} {x : α}
(h : x ∈ l.drop n) :
x ∈ l :=
begin
induction l generalizing n,
case list.nil : n h
{ simpa using h },
case list.cons : l_hd l_tl l_ih n h
{ cases n; simp only [mem_cons_iff, drop] at h ⊢,
{ exact h },
right, apply l_ih h },
end
@[simp] theorem drop_one : ∀ l : list α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := rfl
theorem drop_add : ∀ m n (l : list α), drop (m + n) l = drop m (drop n l)
| m 0 l := rfl
| m (n+1) [] := (drop_nil _).symm
| m (n+1) (a::l) := drop_add m n _
@[simp] theorem drop_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, drop (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂
| [] l₂ := rfl
| (a::l₁) l₂ := drop_left l₁ l₂
theorem drop_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₂ :=
by rw ← h; apply drop_left
theorem drop_eq_nth_le_cons : ∀ {n} {l : list α} h,
drop n l = nth_le l n h :: drop (n+1) l
| 0 (a::l) h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := @drop_eq_nth_le_cons n _ _
@[simp] lemma drop_length (l : list α) : l.drop l.length = [] :=
calc l.drop l.length = (l ++ []).drop l.length : by simp
... = [] : drop_left _ _
lemma drop_append_of_le_length : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l₁.length →
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂
| l₁ l₂ 0 hn := by simp
| [] l₂ (n+1) hn := absurd hn dec_trivial
| (a::l₁) l₂ (n+1) hn :=
by rw [drop, cons_append, drop, drop_append_of_le_length (le_of_succ_le_succ hn)]
/-- Dropping the elements up to `l₁.length + i` in `l₁ + l₂` is the same as dropping the elements
up to `i` in `l₂`. -/
lemma drop_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} (i : ℕ) :
drop (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop i l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁, { simp },
have : length l₁_tl + 1 + i = (length l₁_tl + i).succ,
by { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one, exact succ_add _ _ },
simp only [cons_append, length, this, drop, l₁_ih]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : i + j < L.length) :
nth_le L (i + j) h = nth_le (L.drop i) j
begin
have A : i < L.length := lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h,
rw (take_append_drop i L).symm at h,
simpa only [le_of_lt A, min_eq_left, add_lt_add_iff_left, length_take, length_append] using h
end :=
begin
have A : length (take i L) = i, by simp [le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.le.intro rfl) h)],
rw [nth_le_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, nth_le_append_right];
simp [A]
end
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
lemma nth_le_drop' (L : list α) {i j : ℕ} (h : j < (L.drop i).length) :
nth_le (L.drop i) j h = nth_le L (i + j) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left ((length_drop i L) ▸ h)) :=
by rw nth_le_drop
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : ℕ) : ∀ (m) (l : list α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m [] := by simp
| 0 l := by simp
| (m+1) (a::l) :=
calc drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) : rfl
... = drop (n + m) l : drop_drop m l
... = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) : rfl
theorem drop_take : ∀ (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (l : list α),
drop m (take (m + n) l) = take n (drop m l)
| 0 n _ := by simp
| (m+1) n nil := by simp
| (m+1) n (_::l) :=
have h: m + 1 + n = (m+n) + 1, by ac_refl,
by simpa [take_cons, h] using drop_take m n l
lemma map_drop {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.drop i).map f = (L.map f).drop i
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [map_drop], }
theorem modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop (f : list α → list α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modify_nth_tail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) [] := H.symm
| (n+1) (b::l) := congr_arg (cons b) (modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop n l)
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ modify_head f (drop n l) :=
modify_nth_tail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modify_nth f n l = take n l ++ f (nth_le l n h) :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [modify_nth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_nth_le_cons h]; refl
theorem update_nth_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
update_nth l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n+1) l :=
by rw [update_nth_eq_modify_nth, modify_nth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
lemma reverse_take {α} {xs : list α} (n : ℕ)
(h : n ≤ xs.length) :
xs.reverse.take n = (xs.drop (xs.length - n)).reverse :=
begin
induction xs generalizing n; simp only [reverse_cons, drop, reverse_nil, nat.zero_sub, length, take_nil],
cases decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le h with h' h',
{ replace h' := le_of_succ_le_succ h',
rwa [take_append_of_le_length, xs_ih _ h'],
rw [show xs_tl.length + 1 - n = succ (xs_tl.length - n), from _, drop],
{ rwa [succ_eq_add_one, nat.sub_add_comm] },
{ rwa length_reverse } },
{ subst h', rw [length, nat.sub_self, drop],
rw [show xs_tl.length + 1 = (xs_tl.reverse ++ [xs_hd]).length, from _, take_length, reverse_cons],
rw [length_append, length_reverse], refl }
end
@[simp] lemma update_nth_eq_nil (l : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : l.update_nth n a = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by cases l; cases n; simp only [update_nth]
section take'
variable [inhabited α]
@[simp] theorem take'_length : ∀ n l, length (@take' α _ n l) = n
| 0 l := rfl
| (n+1) l := congr_arg succ (take'_length _ _)
@[simp] theorem take'_nil : ∀ n, take' n (@nil α) = repeat (default _) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (cons _) (take'_nil _)
theorem take'_eq_take : ∀ {n} {l : list α},
n ≤ length l → take' n l = take n l
| 0 l h := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) h := congr_arg (cons _) $
take'_eq_take $ le_of_succ_le_succ h
@[simp] theorem take'_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : take' (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
(take'_eq_take (by simp only [length_append, nat.le_add_right])).trans (take_left _ _)
theorem take'_left' {l₁ l₂ : list α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) :
take' n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ :=
by rw ← h; apply take'_left
end take'
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
lemma foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α)
{l : list β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih generalizing a, {refl},
unfold foldl,
rw [ih (λ a b bin, H a b $ mem_cons_of_mem _ bin), H a hd (mem_cons_self _ _)]
end
lemma foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β)
{l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih, {refl},
simp only [mem_cons_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq] at H,
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
end
@[simp] theorem foldl_nil (f : α → β → α) (a : α) : foldl f a [] = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (b : β) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (b::l) = foldl f (f a b) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : foldr f b [] = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
foldr f b (a::l) = f a (foldr f b l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_append (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : list β), foldl f a (l₁++l₂) = foldl f (foldl f a l₁) l₂
| a [] l₂ := rfl
| a (b::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldl_append (f a b) l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldr_append (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (l₁ l₂ : list α), foldr f b (l₁++l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁
| b [] l₂ := rfl
| b (a::l₁) l₂ := by simp only [cons_append, foldr_cons, foldr_append b l₁ l₂]
@[simp] theorem foldl_join (f : α → β → α) :
∀ (a : α) (L : list (list β)), foldl f a (join L) = foldl (foldl f) a L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_join (foldl f a l) L]
@[simp] theorem foldr_join (f : α → β → β) :
∀ (b : β) (L : list (list α)), foldr f b (join L) = foldr (λ l b, foldr f b l) b L
| a [] := rfl
| a (l::L) := by simp only [join, foldr_append, foldr_join a L, foldr_cons]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (reverse l) = foldr (λx y, f y x) a l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, reverse_cons, foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, foldr]]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : α → β → β) (a : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f a (reverse l) = foldl (λx y, f y x) a l :=
let t := foldl_reverse (λx y, f y x) a (reverse l) in
by rw reverse_reverse l at t; rwa t
@[simp] theorem foldr_eta : ∀ (l : list α), foldr cons [] l = l
| [] := rfl
| (x::l) := by simp only [foldr_cons, foldr_eta l]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem reverse_foldl {l : list α} : reverse (foldl (λ t h, h :: t) [] l) = l :=
by rw ←foldr_reverse; simp
@[simp] theorem foldl_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → γ → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldl f a (map g l) = foldl (λx y, f x (g y)) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldl]]
@[simp] theorem foldr_map (g : β → γ) (f : γ → α → α) (a : α) (l : list β) :
foldr f a (map g l) = foldr (f ∘ g) a l :=
by revert a; induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, map, foldr]]
theorem foldl_map' {α β: Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β)
(a : α) (l : list α) (h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
list.foldl f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (list.foldl f a l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ simp }, { simp [l_ih, h] }
end
theorem foldr_map' {α β: Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' : β → β → β)
(a : α) (l : list α) (h : ∀ x y, f' (g x) (g y) = g (f x y)) :
list.foldr f' (g a) (l.map g) = g (list.foldr f a l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ simp }, { simp [l_ih, h] }
end
theorem foldl_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : α → γ → α) (op' : β → γ → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀a x, f (op a x) = op' (f a) x) : foldl op' (f a) l = f (foldl op a l) :=
eq.symm $ by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldl]] }
theorem foldr_hom (l : list γ) (f : α → β) (op : γ → α → α) (op' : γ → β → β) (a : α)
(h : ∀x a, f (op x a) = op' x (f a)) : foldr op' (f a) l = f (foldr op a l) :=
by { revert a, induction l; intros; [refl, simp only [*, foldr]] }
lemma injective_foldl_comp {α : Type*} {l : list (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, function.injective f) (hf : function.injective f):
function.injective (@list.foldl (α → α) (α → α) function.comp f l) :=
begin
induction l generalizing f,
{ exact hf },
{ apply l_ih (λ _ h, hl _ (list.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)),
apply function.injective.comp hf,
apply hl _ (list.mem_cons_self _ _) }
end
/- scanl -/
section scanl
variables {f : β → α → β} {b : β} {a : α} {l : list α}
lemma length_scanl :
∀ a l, length (scanl f a l) = l.length + 1
| a [] := rfl
| a (x :: l) := by erw [length_cons, length_cons, length_scanl]
@[simp] lemma scanl_nil (b : β) : scanl f b nil = [b] := rfl
@[simp] lemma scanl_cons :
scanl f b (a :: l) = [b] ++ scanl f (f b a) l :=
by simp only [scanl, eq_self_iff_true, singleton_append, and_self]
@[simp] lemma nth_zero_scanl : (scanl f b l).nth 0 = some b :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp only [nth, scanl_nil] },
{ simp only [nth, scanl_cons, singleton_append] }
end
@[simp] lemma nth_le_zero_scanl {h : 0 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nth_le 0 h = b :=
begin
cases l,
{ simp only [nth_le, scanl_nil] },
{ simp only [nth_le, scanl_cons, singleton_append] }
end
lemma nth_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} :
(scanl f b l).nth (i + 1) = ((scanl f b l).nth i).bind (λ x, (l.nth i).map (λ y, f x y)) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing b i,
{ symmetry,
simp only [option.bind_eq_none', nth, forall_2_true_iff, not_false_iff, option.map_none',
scanl_nil, option.not_mem_none, forall_true_iff] },
{ simp only [nth, scanl_cons, singleton_append],
cases i,
{ simp only [option.map_some', nth_zero_scanl, nth, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [hl, nth] } }
end
lemma nth_le_succ_scanl {i : ℕ} {h : i + 1 < (scanl f b l).length} :
(scanl f b l).nth_le (i + 1) h =
f ((scanl f b l).nth_le i (nat.lt_of_succ_lt h))
(l.nth_le i (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_of_eq (length_scanl b l))))) :=
begin
induction i with i hi generalizing b l,
{ cases l,
{ simp only [length, zero_add, scanl_nil] at h,
exact absurd h (lt_irrefl 1) },
{ simp only [scanl_cons, singleton_append, nth_le_zero_scanl, nth_le] } },
{ cases l,
{ simp only [length, add_lt_iff_neg_right, scanl_nil] at h,
exact absurd h (not_lt_of_lt nat.succ_pos') },
{ simp_rw scanl_cons,
rw nth_le_append_right _,
{ simpa only [hi, length, succ_add_sub_one] },
{ simp only [length, nat.zero_le, le_add_iff_nonneg_left] } } }
end
end scanl
/- scanr -/
@[simp] theorem scanr_nil (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : scanr f b [] = [b] := rfl
@[simp] theorem scanr_aux_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) : ∀ (a : α) (l : list α),
scanr_aux f b (a::l) = (foldr f b (a::l), scanr f b l)
| a [] := rfl
| a (x::l) := let t := scanr_aux_cons x l in
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux, t, foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem scanr_cons (f : α → β → β) (b : β) (a : α) (l : list α) :
scanr f b (a::l) = foldr f b (a::l) :: scanr f b l :=
by simp only [scanr, scanr_aux_cons, foldr_cons]; split; refl
section foldl_eq_foldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variables {f : α → α → α} (hcomm : commutative f) (hassoc : associative f)
include hassoc
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (l++[b]) = foldr f b (a::l)
| a b nil := rfl
| a b (c :: l) :=
by simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]; rw hassoc
include hcomm
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a b nil := hcomm a b
| a b (c::l) := by simp only [foldl_cons];
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc, right_comm _ hcomm hassoc]; refl
theorem foldl_eq_foldr : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| a nil := rfl
| a (b :: l) :=
by simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc hcomm hassoc]; rw (foldl_eq_foldr a l)
end foldl_eq_foldr
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → α}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b::l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldl,foldl,foldl,← foldl_eq_of_comm',foldl,hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| a [] := rfl
| a (b :: l) := by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf,foldr,foldl_eq_foldr']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section foldl_eq_foldlr'
variables {f : α → β → β}
variables hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)
include hf
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldr f a (b::l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| a b [] := rfl
| a b (c :: l) := by rw [foldr,foldr,foldr,hf,← foldr_eq_of_comm']; refl
end foldl_eq_foldlr'
section
variables {op : α → α → α} [ha : is_associative α op] [hc : is_commutative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
local notation l <*> a := foldl op a l
include ha
lemma foldl_assoc : ∀ {l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * (l <*> a₂)
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ :=
calc a::l <*> (a₁ * a₂) = l <*> (a₁ * (a₂ * a)) : by simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
... = a₁ * (a::l <*> a₂) : by rw [foldl_assoc, foldl_cons]
lemma foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc : ∀{l : list α} {a₁ a₂}, (l <*> a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * l.foldr (*) a₂
| [] a₁ a₂ := rfl
| (a :: l) a₁ a₂ := by simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc];
rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
include hc
lemma foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : list α} {a₁ a₂} : (a₁ :: l) <*> a₂ = a₁ * (l <*> a₂) :=
by rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### mfoldl, mfoldr, mmap -/
section mfoldl_mfoldr
variables {m : Type v → Type w} [monad m]
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_nil (f : β → α → m β) {b} : mfoldl f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_nil (f : α → β → m β) {b} : mfoldr f b [] = pure b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_cons {f : β → α → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldl f b (a :: l) = f b a >>= λ b', mfoldl f b' l := rfl
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_cons {f : α → β → m β} {b a l} :
mfoldr f b (a :: l) = mfoldr f b l >>= f a := rfl
theorem mfoldr_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
mfoldr f b l = foldr (λ a mb, mb >>= f a) (pure b) l :=
by induction l; simp *
attribute [simp] mmap mmap'
variables [is_lawful_monad m]
theorem mfoldl_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
mfoldl f b l = foldl (λ mb a, mb >>= λ b, f b a) (pure b) l :=
begin
suffices h : ∀ (mb : m β),
(mb >>= λ b, mfoldl f b l) = foldl (λ mb a, mb >>= λ b, f b a) mb l,
by simp [←h (pure b)],
induction l; intro,
{ simp },
{ simp only [mfoldl, foldl, ←l_ih] with monad_norm }
end
@[simp] theorem mfoldl_append {f : β → α → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldl f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldl f b l₁ >>= λ x, mfoldl f x l₂
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldl_nil, pure_bind]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [cons_append, mfoldl_cons, mfoldl_append, bind_assoc]
@[simp] theorem mfoldr_append {f : α → β → m β} : ∀ {b l₁ l₂},
mfoldr f b (l₁ ++ l₂) = mfoldr f b l₂ >>= λ x, mfoldr f x l₁
| _ [] _ := by simp only [nil_append, mfoldr_nil, bind_pure]
| _ (_::_) _ := by simp only [mfoldr_cons, cons_append, mfoldr_append, bind_assoc]
end mfoldl_mfoldr
/-! ### prod and sum -/
-- list.sum was already defined in defs.lean, but we couldn't tag it with `to_additive` yet.
attribute [to_additive] list.prod
section monoid
variables [monoid α] {l l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_nil : ([] : list α).prod = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_singleton : [a].prod = a := one_mul a
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_cons : (a::l).prod = a * l.prod :=
calc (a::l).prod = foldl (*) (a * 1) l : by simp only [list.prod, foldl_cons, one_mul, mul_one]
... = _ : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_append : (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = l₁.prod * l₂.prod :=
calc (l₁ ++ l₂).prod = foldl (*) (foldl (*) 1 l₁ * 1) l₂ : by simp [list.prod]
... = l₁.prod * l₂.prod : foldl_assoc
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_join {l : list (list α)} : l.join.prod = (l.map list.prod).prod :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, list.join, map, prod_append, prod_cons]]
theorem prod_ne_zero {R : Type*} [domain R] {L : list R} :
(∀ x ∈ L, (x : _) ≠ 0) → L.prod ≠ 0 :=
list.rec_on L (λ _, one_ne_zero) $ λ hd tl ih H,
by { rw forall_mem_cons at H, rw prod_cons, exact mul_ne_zero H.1 (ih H.2) }
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr : l.prod = foldr (*) 1 l :=
list.rec_on l rfl $ λ a l ihl, by rw [prod_cons, foldr_cons, ihl]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (l : list α) {r : β → γ → Prop}
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀⦃a b c⦄, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (l.map f).prod (l.map g).prod :=
list.rec_on l h₁ (λ a l hl, by simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, h₂ hl])
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom [monoid β] (l : list α) (f : α →* β) :
(l.map f).prod = f l.prod :=
by { simp only [prod, foldl_map, f.map_one.symm],
exact l.foldl_hom _ _ _ 1 f.map_mul }
-- `to_additive` chokes on the next few lemmas, so we do them by hand below
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_mul_prod_drop :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).prod * (L.drop i).prod = L.prod
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, mul_assoc, prod_take_mul_prod_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma prod_take_succ :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).prod = (L.take i).prod * L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_take_succ, mul_assoc], }
/-- A list with product not one must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_prod_ne_one (L : list α) (h : L.prod ≠ 1) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
lemma prod_update_nth : ∀ (L : list α) (n : ℕ) (a : α),
(L.update_nth n a).prod =
(L.take n).prod * (if n < L.length then a else 1) * (L.drop (n + 1)).prod
| (x::xs) 0 a := by simp [update_nth]
| (x::xs) (i+1) a := by simp [update_nth, prod_update_nth xs i a, mul_assoc]
| [] _ _ := by simp [update_nth, (nat.zero_le _).not_lt]
end monoid
section group
variables [group α]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv_rev` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg_rev`"]
lemma prod_inv_reverse : ∀ (L : list α), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).reverse.prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [prod_inv_reverse xs]
/-- A non-commutative variant of `list.prod_reverse` -/
@[to_additive "A non-commutative variant of `list.sum_reverse`"]
lemma prod_reverse_noncomm : ∀ (L : list α), L.reverse.prod = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod⁻¹ :=
by simp [prod_inv_reverse]
end group
section comm_group
variables [comm_group α]
/-- This is the `list.prod` version of `mul_inv` -/
@[to_additive "This is the `list.sum` version of `add_neg`"]
lemma prod_inv : ∀ (L : list α), L.prod⁻¹ = (L.map (λ x, x⁻¹)).prod
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) := by simp [mul_comm, prod_inv xs]
end comm_group
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_add_sum_drop [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ), (L.take i).sum + (L.drop i).sum = L.sum
| [] i := by simp
| L 0 := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, add_assoc, sum_take_add_sum_drop], }
@[simp]
lemma sum_take_succ [add_monoid α] :
∀ (L : list α) (i : ℕ) (p), (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L.take i).sum + L.nth_le i p
| [] i p := by cases p
| (h :: t) 0 _ := by simp
| (h :: t) (n+1) _ := by { dsimp, rw [sum_cons, sum_cons, sum_take_succ, add_assoc], }
lemma eq_of_sum_take_eq [add_left_cancel_monoid α] {L L' : list α} (h : L.length = L'.length)
(h' : ∀ i ≤ L.length, (L.take i).sum = (L'.take i).sum) : L = L' :=
begin
apply ext_le h (λ i h₁ h₂, _),
have : (L.take (i + 1)).sum = (L'.take (i + 1)).sum := h' _ (nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁),
rw [sum_take_succ L i h₁, sum_take_succ L' i h₂, h' i (le_of_lt h₁)] at this,
exact add_left_cancel this
end
lemma monotone_sum_take [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (L : list α) :
monotone (λ i, (L.take i).sum) :=
begin
apply monotone_of_monotone_nat (λ n, _),
by_cases h : n < L.length,
{ rw sum_take_succ _ _ h,
exact le_add_right (le_refl _) },
{ push_neg at h,
simp [take_all_of_le h, take_all_of_le (le_trans h (nat.le_succ _))] }
end
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le [ordered_comm_monoid α] {l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) :
1 ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l with hd tl ih,
{ simp },
rw prod_cons,
exact one_le_mul (hl₁ hd (mem_cons_self hd tl)) (ih (λ x h, hl₁ x (mem_cons_of_mem hd h))),
end
@[to_additive]
lemma single_le_prod [ordered_comm_monoid α] {l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) :
∀ x ∈ l, x ≤ l.prod :=
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
simp_rw [prod_cons, forall_mem_cons] at ⊢ hl₁,
split,
{ exact le_mul_of_one_le_right' (one_le_prod_of_one_le hl₁.2) },
{ exact λ x H, le_mul_of_one_le_of_le hl₁.1 (l_ih hl₁.right x H) },
end
@[to_additive all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero]
lemma all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one [ordered_comm_monoid α]
{l : list α} (hl₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, (1 : α) ≤ x) (hl₂ : l.prod = 1) :
∀ x ∈ l, x = (1 : α) :=
λ x hx, le_antisymm (hl₂ ▸ single_le_prod hl₁ _ hx) (hl₁ x hx)
lemma sum_eq_zero_iff [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] (l : list α) :
l.sum = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, x = (0 : α) :=
⟨all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero (λ _ _, zero_le _),
begin
induction l,
{ simp },
{ intro h,
rw [sum_cons, add_eq_zero_iff],
rw forall_mem_cons at h,
exact ⟨h.1, l_ih h.2⟩ },
end⟩
/-- A list with sum not zero must have positive length. -/
lemma length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero [add_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : L.sum ≠ 0) : 0 < L.length :=
by { cases L, { simp at h, cases h, }, { simp, }, }
/-- If all elements in a list are bounded below by `1`, then the length of the list is bounded
by the sum of the elements. -/
lemma length_le_sum_of_one_le (L : list ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ L, 1 ≤ i) : L.length ≤ L.sum :=
begin
induction L with j L IH h, { simp },
rw [sum_cons, length, add_comm],
exact add_le_add (h _ (set.mem_insert _ _)) (IH (λ i hi, h i (set.mem_union_right _ hi)))
end
-- Now we tie those lemmas back to their multiplicative versions.
attribute [to_additive] prod_take_mul_prod_drop prod_take_succ length_pos_of_prod_ne_one
/-- A list with positive sum must have positive length. -/
-- This is an easy consequence of `length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero`, but often useful in applications.
lemma length_pos_of_sum_pos [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid α] (L : list α) (h : 0 < L.sum) :
0 < L.length :=
length_pos_of_sum_ne_zero L (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem prod_erase [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] {a} :
Π {l : list α}, a ∈ l → a * (l.erase a).prod = l.prod
| (b::l) h :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem h with rfl | ⟨ne, h⟩,
{ simp only [list.erase, if_pos, prod_cons] },
{ simp only [list.erase, if_neg (mt eq.symm ne), prod_cons, prod_erase h, mul_left_comm a b] }
end
lemma dvd_prod [comm_monoid α] {a} {l : list α} (ha : a ∈ l) : a ∣ l.prod :=
let ⟨s, t, h⟩ := mem_split ha in
by rw [h, prod_append, prod_cons, mul_left_comm]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
@[simp] theorem sum_const_nat (m n : ℕ) : sum (list.repeat m n) = m * n :=
by induction n; [refl, simp only [*, repeat_succ, sum_cons, nat.mul_succ, add_comm]]
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a} {l : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, a ∣ x) : a ∣ l.sum :=
begin
induction l with x l ih,
{ exact dvd_zero _ },
{ rw [list.sum_cons],
exact dvd_add (h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih (λ x hx, h x (mem_cons_of_mem _ hx))) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_join (L : list (list α)) : length (join L) = sum (map length L) :=
by induction L; [refl, simp only [*, join, map, sum_cons, length_append]]
@[simp] theorem length_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
length (list.bind l f) = sum (map (length ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [list.bind, length_join, map_map]
lemma exists_lt_of_sum_lt [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum < (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x < g x :=
begin
induction l with x l,
{ exfalso, exact lt_irrefl _ h },
{ by_cases h' : f x < g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases l_ih _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩, refine ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_lt_of_le h $ add_le_add_right (le_of_not_gt h') _) }
end
lemma exists_le_of_sum_le [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : list α}
(hl : l ≠ []) (f g : α → β) (h : (l.map f).sum ≤ (l.map g).sum) : ∃ x ∈ l, f x ≤ g x :=
begin
cases l with x l,
{ contradiction },
{ by_cases h' : f x ≤ g x, exact ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _, h'⟩,
rcases exists_lt_of_sum_lt f g _ with ⟨y, h1y, h2y⟩,
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h1y, le_of_lt h2y⟩, simp at h,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left (lt_of_le_of_lt h $ add_lt_add_right (lt_of_not_ge h') _) }
end
-- Several lemmas about sum/head/tail for `list ℕ`.
-- These are hard to generalize well, as they rely on the fact that `default ℕ = 0`.
-- We'd like to state this as `L.head * L.tail.prod = L.prod`,
-- but because `L.head` relies on an inhabited instances and
-- returns a garbage value for the empty list, this is not possible.
-- Instead we write the statement in terms of `(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1`,
-- and below, restate the lemma just for `ℕ`.
@[to_additive]
lemma head_mul_tail_prod' [monoid α] (L : list α) :
(L.nth 0).get_or_else 1 * L.tail.prod = L.prod :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_add_tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head + L.tail.sum = L.sum :=
by { cases L, { simp, refl, }, { simp, }, }
lemma head_le_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.head ≤ L.sum :=
nat.le.intro (head_add_tail_sum L)
lemma tail_sum (L : list ℕ) : L.tail.sum = L.sum - L.head :=
by rw [← head_add_tail_sum L, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel]
section
variables {G : Type*} [comm_group G]
attribute [to_additive] alternating_prod
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_nil :
alternating_prod ([] : list G) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma alternating_prod_singleton (g : G) :
alternating_prod [g] = g := rfl
@[simp, to_additive alternating_sum_cons_cons']
lemma alternating_prod_cons_cons (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_prod (g :: h :: l) = g * h⁻¹ * alternating_prod l := rfl
lemma alternating_sum_cons_cons {G : Type*} [add_comm_group G] (g h : G) (l : list G) :
alternating_sum (g :: h :: l) = g - h + alternating_sum l :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, alternating_sum]
end
/-! ### join -/
attribute [simp] join
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : list (list α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] := iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| (l::L) := by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
@[simp] theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : list (list α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ :=
by induction L₁; [refl, simp only [*, join, cons_append, append_assoc]]
lemma join_join (l : list (list (list α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join :=
by { induction l, simp, simp [l_ih] }
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma take_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.take i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [take_append, L_ih]
end
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists. -/
lemma drop_sum_join (L : list (list α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = (L.drop i).join :=
begin
induction L generalizing i, { simp },
cases i, { simp },
simp [drop_append, L_ih],
end
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le (L : list α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i+1)).drop i = [nth_le L i hi] :=
begin
induction L generalizing i,
{ simp only [length] at hi, exact (nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim },
cases i, { simp },
have : i < L_tl.length,
{ simp at hi,
exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi },
simp [L_ih this],
refl
end
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lenghts of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`. -/
lemma drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le (L : list (list α)) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.join.take ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum).drop ((L.map length).take i).sum = nth_le L i hi :=
begin
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i+1)).map length).take i, by simp [map_take, take_take],
simp [take_sum_join, this, drop_sum_join, drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le _ hi]
end
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt1 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < ((L.map length).take (i+1)).sum :=
by simp [hi, sum_take_succ, hj]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to control elements in a join. -/
lemma sum_take_map_length_lt2 (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
((L.map length).take i).sum + j < L.join.length :=
begin
convert lt_of_lt_of_le (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj) (monotone_sum_take _ hi),
have : L.length = (L.map length).length, by simp,
simp [this, -length_map]
end
/-- The `n`-th element in a join of sublists is the `j`-th element of the `i`th sublist,
where `n` can be obtained in terms of `i` and `j` by adding the lengths of all the sublists
of index `< i`, and adding `j`. -/
lemma nth_le_join (L : list (list α)) {i j : ℕ}
(hi : i < L.length) (hj : j < (nth_le L i hi).length) :
nth_le L.join (((L.map length).take i).sum + j) (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) =
nth_le (nth_le L i hi) j hj :=
by rw [nth_le_take L.join (sum_take_map_length_lt2 L hi hj) (sum_take_map_length_lt1 L hi hj),
nth_le_drop, nth_le_of_eq (drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le L hi)]
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : list (list α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, by simp [H], _⟩,
rintros ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩,
apply ext_le,
{ have : length (map length L) = length (map length L'), by rw length_eq,
simpa using this },
{ assume n h₁ h₂,
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le, join_eq, length_eq] }
end
/-! ### lexicographic ordering -/
/-- Given a strict order `<` on `α`, the lexicographic strict order on `list α`, for which
`[a0, ..., an] < [b0, ..., b_k]` if `a0 < b0` or `a0 = b0` and `[a1, ..., an] < [b1, ..., bk]`.
The definition is given for any relation `r`, not only strict orders. -/
inductive lex (r : α → α → Prop) : list α → list α → Prop
| nil {a l} : lex [] (a :: l)
| cons {a l₁ l₂} (h : lex l₁ l₂) : lex (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂)
| rel {a₁ l₁ a₂ l₂} (h : r a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁ :: l₁) (a₂ :: l₂)
namespace lex
theorem cons_iff {r : α → α → Prop} [is_irrefl α r] {a l₁ l₂} :
lex r (a :: l₁) (a :: l₂) ↔ lex r l₁ l₂ :=
⟨λ h, by cases h with _ _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ _ h;
[exact h, exact (irrefl_of r a h).elim], lex.cons⟩
@[simp] theorem not_nil_right (r : α → α → Prop) (l : list α) : ¬ lex r l [].
instance is_order_connected (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_order_connected α r] [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_order_connected (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| _, [], c::l₃, nil := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, rel _ := or.inr nil
| _, [], c::l₃, cons _ := or.inr nil
| _, b::l₂, c::l₃, nil := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, b::l₂, c::l₃, rel h :=
(is_order_connected.conn _ b _ h).imp rel rel
| a::l₁, b::l₂, _::l₃, cons h := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match _ l₂ _ h).imp cons cons },
{ exact or.inr (rel ab) }
end
end⟩
instance is_trichotomous (r : α → α → Prop) [is_trichotomous α r] :
is_trichotomous (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| [], [] := or.inr (or.inl rfl)
| [], b::l₂ := or.inl nil
| a::l₁, [] := or.inr (or.inr nil)
| a::l₁, b::l₂ := begin
rcases trichotomous_of r a b with ab | rfl | ab,
{ exact or.inl (rel ab) },
{ exact (_match l₁ l₂).imp cons
(or.imp (congr_arg _) cons) },
{ exact or.inr (or.inr (rel ab)) }
end
end⟩
instance is_asymm (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_asymm α r] : is_asymm (list α) (lex r) :=
⟨λ l₁, match l₁ with
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₁ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.rel h₁, lex.cons h₂ := asymm h₁ h₁
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.rel h₂ := asymm h₂ h₂
| a::l₁, b::l₂, lex.cons h₁, lex.cons h₂ :=
by exact _match _ _ h₁ h₂
end⟩
instance is_strict_total_order (r : α → α → Prop)
[is_strict_total_order' α r] : is_strict_total_order' (list α) (lex r) :=
{..is_strict_weak_order_of_is_order_connected}
instance decidable_rel [decidable_eq α] (r : α → α → Prop)
[decidable_rel r] : decidable_rel (lex r)
| l₁ [] := is_false $ λ h, by cases h
| [] (b::l₂) := is_true lex.nil
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) := begin
haveI := decidable_rel l₁ l₂,
refine decidable_of_iff (r a b ∨ a = b ∧ lex r l₁ l₂) ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rcases h with h | ⟨rfl, h⟩,
{ exact lex.rel h },
{ exact lex.cons h } },
{ rcases h with _|⟨_,_,_,h⟩|⟨_,_,_,_,h⟩,
{ exact or.inr ⟨rfl, h⟩ },
{ exact or.inl h } }
end
theorem append_right (r : α → α → Prop) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} t, lex r s₁ s₂ → lex r s₁ (s₂ ++ t)
| _ _ t nil := nil
| _ _ t (cons h) := cons (append_right _ h)
| _ _ t (rel r) := rel r
theorem append_left (R : α → α → Prop) {t₁ t₂} (h : lex R t₁ t₂) :
∀ s, lex R (s ++ t₁) (s ++ t₂)
| [] := h
| (a::l) := cons (append_left l)
theorem imp {r s : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) :
∀ l₁ l₂, lex r l₁ l₂ → lex s l₁ l₂
| _ _ nil := nil
| _ _ (cons h) := cons (imp _ _ h)
| _ _ (rel r) := rel (H _ _ r)
theorem to_ne : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, lex (≠) l₁ l₂ → l₁ ≠ l₂
| _ _ (cons h) e := to_ne h (list.cons.inj e).2
| _ _ (rel r) e := r (list.cons.inj e).1
theorem ne_iff {l₁ l₂ : list α} (H : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) :
lex (≠) l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≠ l₂ :=
⟨to_ne, λ h, begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH generalizing l₂; cases l₂ with b l₂,
{ contradiction },
{ apply nil },
{ exact (not_lt_of_ge H).elim (succ_pos _) },
{ cases classical.em (a = b) with ab ab,
{ subst b, apply cons,
exact IH (le_of_succ_le_succ H) (mt (congr_arg _) h) },
{ exact rel ab } }
end⟩
end lex
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_lt' [has_lt α] : has_lt (list α) := ⟨lex (<)⟩
theorem nil_lt_cons [has_lt α] (a : α) (l : list α) : [] < a :: l :=
lex.nil
instance [linear_order α] : linear_order (list α) :=
linear_order_of_STO' (lex (<))
--Note: this overrides an instance in core lean
instance has_le' [linear_order α] : has_le (list α) :=
preorder.to_has_le _
/-! ### all & any -/
@[simp] theorem all_nil (p : α → bool) : all [] p = tt := rfl
@[simp] theorem all_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
all (a::l) p = (p a && all l p) := rfl
theorem all_iff_forall {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : all l p ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
simp only [all_cons, band_coe_iff, ih, forall_mem_cons]
end
theorem all_iff_forall_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : all l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [all_iff_forall, bool.of_to_bool_iff]
@[simp] theorem any_nil (p : α → bool) : any [] p = ff := rfl
@[simp] theorem any_cons (p : α → bool) (a : α) (l : list α) :
any (a::l) p = (p a || any l p) := rfl
theorem any_iff_exists {p : α → bool} {l : list α} : any l p ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_false bool.not_ff (not_exists_mem_nil _) },
simp only [any_cons, bor_coe_iff, ih, exists_mem_cons_iff]
end
theorem any_iff_exists_prop {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{l : list α} : any l (λ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp [any_iff_exists]
theorem any_of_mem {p : α → bool} {a : α} {l : list α} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : any l p :=
any_iff_exists.2 ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
@[priority 500] instance decidable_forall_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∀ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ all_iff_forall_prop
instance decidable_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
decidable (∃ x ∈ l, p x) :=
decidable_of_iff _ any_iff_exists_prop
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
/-- Partial map. If `f : Π a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on
`a : α` satisfying `p`, then `pmap f l h` is essentially the same as `map f l`
but is defined only when all members of `l` satisfy `p`, using the proof
to apply `f`. -/
@[simp] def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) : Π l : list α, (∀ a ∈ l, p a) → list β
| [] H := []
| (a::l) H := f a (forall_mem_cons.1 H).1 :: pmap l (forall_mem_cons.1 H).2
/-- "Attach" the proof that the elements of `l` are in `l` to produce a new list
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ l}`. -/
def attach (l : list α) : list {x // x ∈ l} := pmap subtype.mk l (λ a, id)
theorem sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem [has_sizeof α] {x : α} {l : list α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
sizeof x < sizeof l :=
begin
induction l with h t ih; cases hx,
{ rw hx, exact lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg (lt_one_add _) (nat.zero_le _) },
{ exact lt_add_of_pos_of_le (zero_lt_one_add _) (le_of_lt (ih hx)) }
end
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : list α) (H) :
@pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) l H = map f l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(l : list α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f l H₁ = pmap g l H₂ :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl, rw [pmap, pmap, h, ih]]
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : map g (pmap f l H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) l H :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (g : ∀ b, p b → γ) (f : α → β)
(l H) : pmap g (map f l) H = pmap (λ a h, g (f a) h) l (λ a h, H _ (mem_map_of_mem _ h)) :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, map]]; split; refl
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l H) : pmap f l H = l.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr l (λ a h₁ h₂, rfl)
theorem attach_map_val (l : list α) : l.attach.map subtype.val = l :=
by rw [attach, map_pmap]; exact (pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _).trans (map_id l)
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (l : list α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach | ⟨a, h⟩ :=
by have := mem_map.1 (by rw [attach_map_val]; exact h);
{ rcases this with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, m, rfl⟩, exact m }
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H b} : b ∈ pmap f l H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ l), f a (H a h) = b :=
by simp only [pmap_eq_map_attach, mem_map, mem_attach, true_and, subtype.exists]
@[simp] theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : length (pmap f l H) = length l :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, pmap, length]]
@[simp] lemma length_attach (L : list α) : L.attach.length = L.length := length_pmap
@[simp] lemma pmap_eq_nil {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{l H} : pmap f l H = [] ↔ l = [] :=
by rw [← length_eq_zero, length_pmap, length_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma attach_eq_nil (l : list α) : l.attach = [] ↔ l = [] := pmap_eq_nil
lemma last_pmap {α β : Type*} (p : α → Prop) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l : list α) (hl₁ : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (hl₂ : l ≠ []) :
(l.pmap f hl₁).last (mt list.pmap_eq_nil.1 hl₂) = f (l.last hl₂) (hl₁ _ (list.last_mem hl₂)) :=
begin
induction l with l_hd l_tl l_ih,
{ apply (hl₂ rfl).elim },
{ cases l_tl,
{ simp },
{ apply l_ih } }
end
/-! ### find -/
section find
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {l : list α} {a : α}
@[simp] theorem find_nil (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : find p [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_pos (l) (h : p a) : find p (a::l) = some a :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem find_cons_of_neg (l) (h : ¬ p a) : find p (a::l) = find p l :=
if_neg h
@[simp] theorem find_eq_none : find p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ¬ p x :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases h : p a,
{ simp only [find_cons_of_pos _ h, h, not_true, false_and] },
{ rwa [find_cons_of_neg _ h, iff_true_intro h, true_and] }
end
theorem find_some (H : find p l = some a) : p a :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, exact h },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact IH H }
end
@[simp] theorem find_mem (H : find p l = some a) : a ∈ l :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {contradiction},
by_cases h : p b,
{ rw find_cons_of_pos _ h at H, cases H, apply mem_cons_self },
{ rw find_cons_of_neg _ h at H, exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (IH H) }
end
end find
/-! ### lookmap -/
section lookmap
variables (f : α → option α)
@[simp] theorem lookmap_nil : [].lookmap f = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_none {a : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = a :: l.lookmap f :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
@[simp] theorem lookmap_cons_some {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : f a = some b) :
(a :: l).lookmap f = b :: l :=
by simp [lookmap, h]
theorem lookmap_some : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap some = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := rfl
theorem lookmap_none : ∀ l : list α, l.lookmap (λ _, none) = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := congr_arg (cons a) (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_congr {f g : α → option α} :
∀ {l : list α}, (∀ a ∈ l, f a = g a) → l.lookmap f = l.lookmap g
| [] H := rfl
| (a::l) H := begin
cases forall_mem_cons.1 H with H₁ H₂,
cases h : g a with b,
{ simp [h, H₁.trans h, lookmap_congr H₂] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h, lookmap_cons_some _ _ (H₁.trans h)] }
end
theorem lookmap_of_forall_not {l : list α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, f a = none) : l.lookmap f = l :=
(lookmap_congr H).trans (lookmap_none l)
theorem lookmap_map_eq (g : α → β) (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), g a = g b) :
∀ l : list α, map g (l.lookmap f) = map g l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := begin
cases h' : f a with b,
{ simp [h', lookmap_map_eq] },
{ simp [lookmap_cons_some _ _ h', h _ _ h'] }
end
theorem lookmap_id' (h : ∀ a (b ∈ f a), a = b) (l : list α) : l.lookmap f = l :=
by rw [← map_id (l.lookmap f), lookmap_map_eq, map_id]; exact h
theorem length_lookmap (l : list α) : length (l.lookmap f) = length l :=
by rw [← length_map, lookmap_map_eq _ (λ _, ()), length_map]; simp
end lookmap
/-! ### filter_map -/
@[simp] theorem filter_map_nil (f : α → option β) : filter_map f [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (l : list α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (l : list α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: l) = b :: filter_map f l :=
by simp only [filter_map, h]; split; refl
lemma filter_map_append {α β : Type*} (l l' : list α) (f : α → option β) :
filter_map f (l ++ l') = filter_map f l ++ filter_map f l' :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ rw [cons_append, filter_map, filter_map],
cases f hd;
simp only [filter_map, hl, cons_append, eq_self_iff_true, and_self] }
end
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
simp only [filter_map_cons_some (some ∘ f) _ _ rfl, IH, map_cons], split; refl
end
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
begin
funext l,
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
by_cases pa : p a,
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_pos pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ pa], split; refl },
{ simp only [filter_map, option.guard, IH, if_neg pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ pa] }
end
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) l :=
begin
induction l with a l IH, {refl},
cases h : f a with b,
{ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, filter_map_cons_none, IH],
simp only [h, option.none_bind'] },
rw filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h,
cases h' : g b with c;
[ rw [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h', filter_map_cons_none, IH],
rw [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h', filter_map_cons_some, IH] ];
simp only [h, h', option.some_bind']
end
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (l : list α) :
filter_map g (map f l) = filter_map (g ∘ f) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p (filter_map f l) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) l :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map]; refl
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (l : list α) :
filter_map f (filter p l) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) l :=
begin
rw [← filter_map_eq_filter, filter_map_filter_map], congr,
funext x,
show (option.guard p x).bind f = ite (p x) (f x) none,
by_cases h : p x,
{ simp only [option.guard, if_pos h, option.some_bind'] },
{ simp only [option.guard, if_neg h, option.none_bind'] }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (l : list α) : filter_map some l = l :=
by rw filter_map_eq_map; apply map_id
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b :=
begin
induction l with a l IH,
{ split, { intro H, cases H }, { rintro ⟨_, H, _⟩, cases H } },
cases h : f a with b',
{ have : f a ≠ some b, {rw h, intro, contradiction},
simp only [filter_map_cons_none _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, exists_eq_left, this, false_or] },
{ have : f a = some b ↔ b = b',
{ split; intro t, {rw t at h; injection h}, {exact t.symm ▸ h} },
simp only [filter_map_cons_some _ _ _ h, IH, mem_cons_iff,
or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib, this, exists_eq_left] }
end
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (l : list α) :
map g (filter_map f l) = l :=
by simp only [map_filter_map, H, filter_map_some]
theorem sublist.filter_map (f : α → option β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter_map f l₁ <+ filter_map f l₂ :=
by induction s with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH;
simp only [filter_map]; cases f a with b;
simp only [filter_map, IH, sublist.cons, sublist.cons2]
theorem sublist.map (f : α → β) {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(s : l₁ <+ l₂) : map f l₁ <+ map f l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_map f ▸ s.filter_map _
/-! ### reduce_option -/
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_cons_of_some (x : α) (l : list (option α)) :
reduce_option (some x :: l) = x :: l.reduce_option :=
by simp only [reduce_option, filter_map, id.def, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_cons_of_none (l : list (option α)) :
reduce_option (none :: l) = l.reduce_option :=
by simp only [reduce_option, filter_map, id.def]
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_nil : @reduce_option α [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma reduce_option_map {l : list (option α)} {f : α → β} :
reduce_option (map (option.map f) l) = map f (reduce_option l) :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [reduce_option_nil, map_nil] },
{ cases hd;
simpa only [true_and, option.map_some', map, eq_self_iff_true,
reduce_option_cons_of_some] using hl },
end
lemma reduce_option_append (l l' : list (option α)) :
(l ++ l').reduce_option = l.reduce_option ++ l'.reduce_option :=
filter_map_append l l' id
lemma reduce_option_length_le (l : list (option α)) :
l.reduce_option.length ≤ l.length :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [reduce_option_nil, length] },
{ cases hd,
{ exact nat.le_succ_of_le hl },
{ simpa only [length, add_le_add_iff_right, reduce_option_cons_of_some] using hl} }
end
lemma reduce_option_length_eq_iff {l : list (option α)} :
l.reduce_option.length = l.length ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, option.is_some x :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl,
{ simp only [forall_const, reduce_option_nil, not_mem_nil,
forall_prop_of_false, eq_self_iff_true, length, not_false_iff] },
{ cases hd,
{ simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, bool.coe_sort_ff, false_and,
reduce_option_cons_of_none, length, option.is_some_none, iff_false],
intro H,
have := reduce_option_length_le tl,
rw H at this,
exact absurd (nat.lt_succ_self _) (not_lt_of_le this) },
{ simp only [hl, true_and, mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, add_left_inj,
bool.coe_sort_tt, length, option.is_some_some, reduce_option_cons_of_some] } }
end
lemma reduce_option_length_lt_iff {l : list (option α)} :
l.reduce_option.length < l.length ↔ none ∈ l :=
begin
convert not_iff_not.mpr reduce_option_length_eq_iff;
simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, reduce_option_length_le l, option.is_none_iff_eq_none]
end
lemma reduce_option_singleton (x : option α) :
[x].reduce_option = x.to_list :=
by cases x; refl
lemma reduce_option_concat (l : list (option α)) (x : option α) :
(l.concat x).reduce_option = l.reduce_option ++ x.to_list :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing x,
{ cases x;
simp [option.to_list] },
{ simp only [concat_eq_append, reduce_option_append] at hl,
cases hd;
simp [hl, reduce_option_append] }
end
lemma reduce_option_concat_of_some (l : list (option α)) (x : α) :
(l.concat (some x)).reduce_option = l.reduce_option.concat x :=
by simp only [reduce_option_nil, concat_eq_append, reduce_option_append, reduce_option_cons_of_some]
lemma reduce_option_mem_iff {l : list (option α)} {x : α} :
x ∈ l.reduce_option ↔ (some x) ∈ l :=
by simp only [reduce_option, id.def, mem_filter_map, exists_eq_right]
lemma reduce_option_nth_iff {l : list (option α)} {x : α} :
(∃ i, l.nth i = some (some x)) ↔ ∃ i, l.reduce_option.nth i = some x :=
by rw [←mem_iff_nth, ←mem_iff_nth, reduce_option_mem_iff]
/-! ### filter -/
section filter
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
filter p l = foldr (λ a out, if p a then a :: out else out) [] l :=
by induction l; simp [*, filter]
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
: ∀ {l : list α}, (∀ x ∈ l, p x ↔ q x) → filter p l = filter q l
| [] _ := rfl
| (a::l) h := by rw forall_mem_cons at h; by_cases pa : p a;
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa, filter_cons_of_pos _ (h.1.1 pa), filter_congr h.2],
simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pa, filter_cons_of_neg _ (mt h.1.2 pa), filter_congr h.2]];
split; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (l : list α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
(filter_sublist l).subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ filter p l → p a
| (b::l) ain :=
if pb : p b then
have a ∈ b :: filter p l, by simpa only [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb] using ain,
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
(assume : a = b, begin rw [← this] at pb, exact pb end)
(assume : a ∈ filter p l, of_mem_filter this)
else
begin simp only [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb] at ain, exact (of_mem_filter ain) end
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → p a → a ∈ filter p l
| (_::l) (or.inl rfl) pa := by rw filter_cons_of_pos _ pa; apply mem_cons_self
| (b::l) (or.inr ain) pa := if pb : p b
then by rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ pb]; apply mem_cons_of_mem; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
else by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ pb]; apply mem_filter_of_mem ain pa
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {l} : a ∈ filter p l ↔ a ∈ l ∧ p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_mem_filter h, of_mem_filter h⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, mem_filter_of_mem h₁ h₂⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
begin
induction l with a l ih,
{ exact iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _) },
rw forall_mem_cons, by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_inj, ih, and_iff_right h] },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
refine iff_of_false _ (mt and.left h), intro e,
have := filter_sublist l, rw e at this,
exact not_lt_of_ge (length_le_of_sublist this) (lt_succ_self _) }
end
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, ¬p a :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
variable (p)
theorem filter_sublist_filter {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ :=
filter_map_eq_filter p ▸ s.filter_map _
theorem filter_of_map (f : β → α) (l) : filter p (map f l) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) l) :=
by rw [← filter_map_eq_map, filter_filter_map, filter_map_filter]; refl
@[simp] theorem filter_filter (q) [decidable_pred q] : ∀ l,
filter p (filter q l) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) := by by_cases hp : p a; by_cases hq : q a; simp only [hp, hq, filter, if_true, if_false,
true_and, false_and, filter_filter l, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp] lemma filter_true {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, true)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, true) h l = l :=
by convert filter_eq_self.2 (λ _ _, trivial)
@[simp] lemma filter_false {h : decidable_pred (λ a : α, false)} (l : list α) :
@filter α (λ _, false) h l = [] :=
by convert filter_eq_nil.2 (λ _ _, id)
@[simp] theorem span_eq_take_drop : ∀ (l : list α), span p l = (take_while p l, drop_while p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) :=
if pa : p a then by simp only [span, if_pos pa, span_eq_take_drop l, take_while, drop_while]
else by simp only [span, take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa]
@[simp] theorem take_while_append_drop : ∀ (l : list α), take_while p l ++ drop_while p l = l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := if pa : p a then by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_pos pa, if_pos pa, cons_append,
take_while_append_drop l]
else by rw [take_while, drop_while, if_neg pa, if_neg pa, nil_append]
@[simp] theorem countp_nil : countp p [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (l) (pa : p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l + 1 :=
if_pos pa
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (l) (pa : ¬ p a) : countp p (a::l) = countp p l :=
if_neg pa
theorem countp_eq_length_filter (l) : countp p l = length (filter p l) :=
by induction l with x l ih; [refl, by_cases (p x)];
[simp only [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, countp, ih, if_pos h],
simp only [countp_cons_of_neg _ _ h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg _ h]]; refl
local attribute [simp] countp_eq_length_filter
@[simp] theorem countp_append (l₁ l₂) : countp p (l₁ ++ l₂) = countp p l₁ + countp p l₂ :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_append, length_append]
theorem countp_pos {l} : 0 < countp p l ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, p a :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, length_pos_iff_exists_mem, mem_filter, exists_prop]
theorem countp_le_of_sublist {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : countp p l₁ ≤ countp p l₂ :=
by simpa only [countp_eq_length_filter] using length_le_of_sublist (filter_sublist_filter p s)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (l : list α) :
countp p (filter q l) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) l :=
by simp only [countp_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
end filter
/-! ### count -/
section count
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem count_nil (a : α) : count a [] = 0 := rfl
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = if a = b then succ (count a l) else count a l := rfl
theorem count_cons' (a b : α) (l : list α) :
count a (b :: l) = count a l + (if a = b then 1 else 0) :=
begin rw count_cons, split_ifs; refl end
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (a::l) = succ (count a l) :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (l : list α) : count a (b::l) = count a l :=
if_neg h
theorem count_tail : Π (l : list α) (a : α) (h : 0 < l.length),
l.tail.count a = l.count a - ite (a = list.nth_le l 0 h) 1 0
| (_ :: _) a h := by { rw [count_cons], split_ifs; simp }
theorem count_le_of_sublist (a : α) {l₁ l₂} : l₁ <+ l₂ → count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ :=
countp_le_of_sublist _
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
count_le_of_sublist _ (sublist_cons _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a [a] = 1 := if_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem count_append (a : α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, count a (l₁ ++ l₂) = count a l₁ + count a l₂ :=
countp_append _
theorem count_concat (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (concat l a) = succ (count a l) :=
by simp [-add_comm]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {l : list α} : 0 < count a l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simp only [count, countp_pos, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : count a l = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem not_mem_of_count_eq_zero {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = 0) : a ∉ l :=
λ h', ne_of_gt (count_pos.2 h') h
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by rw [count, countp_eq_length_filter, filter_eq_self.2, length_repeat];
exact λ b m, (eq_of_mem_repeat m).symm
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_sublist {a : α} {l : list α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ count a l ↔ repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ h, ((repeat_sublist_repeat a).2 h).trans $
have filter (eq a) l = repeat a (count a l), from eq_repeat.2
⟨by simp only [count, countp_eq_length_filter], λ b m, (of_mem_filter m).symm⟩,
by rw ← this; apply filter_sublist,
λ h, by simpa only [count_repeat] using count_le_of_sublist a h⟩
theorem repeat_count_eq_of_count_eq_length {a : α} {l : list α} (h : count a l = length l) :
repeat a (count a l) = l :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq (le_count_iff_repeat_sublist.mp (le_refl (count a l)))
(eq.trans (length_repeat a (count a l)) h)
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {l : list α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p l) = count a l :=
by simp only [count, countp_filter]; congr; exact
set.ext (λ b, and_iff_left_of_imp (λ e, e ▸ h))
end count
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) :=
by rw ← list.append_assoc; apply infix_append
theorem nil_prefix (l : list α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : list α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem prefix_refl (l : list α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
@[refl] theorem suffix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem prefix_concat (a : α) (l) : l <+: concat l a := by simp
theorem infix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem infix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ :=
λ⟨t, h⟩, ⟨t, [], by simp only [h, append_nil]⟩
@[refl] theorem infix_refl (l : list α) : l <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ prefix_refl l
theorem nil_infix (l : list α) : [] <:+: l := infix_of_prefix $ nil_prefix l
theorem infix_cons {L₁ L₂ : list α} {x : α} : L₁ <:+: L₂ → L₁ <:+: x :: L₂ :=
λ⟨LP, LS, H⟩, ⟨x :: LP, LS, H ▸ rfl⟩
@[trans] theorem is_prefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
@[trans] theorem is_suffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
@[trans] theorem is_infix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l ._ ._ ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ := ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
theorem sublist_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
λ⟨s, t, h⟩, by rw [← h]; exact (sublist_append_right _ _).trans (sublist_append_left _ _)
theorem sublist_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_prefix
theorem sublist_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
sublist_of_infix ∘ infix_of_suffix
theorem reverse_suffix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r,
by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
λ ⟨r, e⟩, ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
theorem reverse_prefix {l₁ l₂ : list α} : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
by rw ← reverse_suffix; simp only [reverse_reverse]
theorem length_le_of_infix {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : length l₁ ≤ length l₂ :=
length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_infix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_sublist_nil $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_nil_of_prefix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <+: []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_prefix s
theorem eq_nil_of_suffix_nil {l : list α} (s : l <:+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_infix_nil $ infix_of_suffix s
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨λ⟨s, t, e⟩, ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, by rw [← e, append_assoc]; exact ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
λ⟨._, ⟨t, rfl⟩, ⟨s, e⟩⟩, ⟨s, t, by rw append_assoc; exact e⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_infix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_infix s
theorem eq_of_prefix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+: l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_prefix s
theorem eq_of_suffix_of_length_eq {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq $ sublist_of_suffix s
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α},
l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ _ := nil_prefix _
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) _ ⟨r₁, rfl⟩ ⟨r₂, e⟩ ll := begin
injection e with _ e', subst b,
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩
(le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
end
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 $ prefix_of_prefix_length_le
(reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp
reverse_prefix.1 reverse_prefix.1
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : list (list α)} {l}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| (_ :: L) l (or.inl rfl) := infix_append [] _ _
| (l' :: L) l (or.inr h) :=
is_infix.trans (infix_of_mem_join h) $ infix_of_suffix $ suffix_append _ _
theorem prefix_append_right_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr $ λ r, by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
theorem prefix_cons_inj {l₁ l₂ : list α} (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : list α) : take n l <+: l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : list α) : drop n l <:+ l := ⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem tail_suffix (l : list α) : tail l <:+ l := by rw ← drop_one; apply drop_suffix
theorem tail_subset (l : list α) : tail l ⊆ l := (sublist_of_suffix (tail_suffix l)).subset
theorem prefix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ ++ drop (length l₁) l₂ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; rw drop_left, λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_append {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ take (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ ++ l₁ = l₂ :=
⟨by rintros ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp only [length_append, nat.add_sub_cancel, take_left], λ e, ⟨_, e⟩⟩
theorem prefix_iff_eq_take {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ l₁ = take (length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_right_cancel $
(prefix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ take_prefix _ _⟩
theorem suffix_iff_eq_drop {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ <:+ l₂ ↔ l₁ = drop (length l₂ - length l₁) l₂ :=
⟨λ h, append_left_cancel $
(suffix_iff_eq_append.1 h).trans (take_append_drop _ _).symm,
λ e, e.symm ▸ drop_suffix _ _⟩
instance decidable_prefix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, list.no_confusion te
| (a::l₁) (b::l₂) :=
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_iff _ _ (by rw [← h, prefix_cons_inj])
(decidable_prefix l₁ l₂)
else
is_false $ λ ⟨t, te⟩, h $ by injection te
-- Alternatively, use mem_tails
instance decidable_suffix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+ l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨l₂, append_nil _⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ mt (length_le_of_sublist ∘ sublist_of_suffix) dec_trivial
| l₁ l₂ := let len1 := length l₁, len2 := length l₂ in
if hl : len1 ≤ len2 then
decidable_of_iff' (l₁ = drop (len2-len1) l₂) suffix_iff_eq_drop
else is_false $ λ h, hl $ length_le_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix h
lemma prefix_take_le_iff {L : list (list (option α))} {m n : ℕ} (hm : m < L.length) :
(take m L) <+: (take n L) ↔ m ≤ n :=
begin
simp only [prefix_iff_eq_take, length_take],
induction m with m IH generalizing L n,
{ simp only [min_eq_left, eq_self_iff_true, nat.zero_le, take] },
{ cases n,
{ simp only [nat.nat_zero_eq_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, take, take_nil],
split,
{ cases L,
{ exact absurd hm (not_lt_of_le m.succ.zero_le) },
{ simp only [forall_prop_of_false, not_false_iff, take] } },
{ intro h,
contradiction } },
{ cases L with l ls,
{ exact absurd hm (not_lt_of_le m.succ.zero_le) },
{ simp only [length] at hm,
specialize @IH ls n (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm),
simp only [le_of_lt (nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm), min_eq_left] at IH,
simp only [le_of_lt hm, IH, true_and, min_eq_left, eq_self_iff_true, length, take],
exact ⟨nat.succ_le_succ, nat.le_of_succ_le_succ⟩ } } },
end
lemma cons_prefix_iff {l l' : list α} {x y : α} :
x :: l <+: y :: l' ↔ x = y ∧ l <+: l' :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨L, hL⟩,
simp only [cons_append] at hL,
exact ⟨hL.left, ⟨L, hL.right⟩⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨rfl, h⟩,
rwa [prefix_cons_inj] },
end
lemma map_prefix {l l' : list α} (f : α → β) (h : l <+: l') :
l.map f <+: l'.map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp only [nil_prefix, map_nil] },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simpa only using eq_nil_of_prefix_nil h },
{ rw cons_prefix_iff at h,
simp only [h, prefix_cons_inj, hl, map] } },
end
lemma is_prefix.filter_map {l l' : list α} (h : l <+: l') (f : α → option β) :
l.filter_map f <+: l'.filter_map f :=
begin
induction l with hd tl hl generalizing l',
{ simp only [nil_prefix, filter_map_nil] },
{ cases l' with hd' tl',
{ simpa only using eq_nil_of_prefix_nil h },
{ rw cons_prefix_iff at h,
rw [←@singleton_append _ hd _, ←@singleton_append _ hd' _, filter_map_append,
filter_map_append, h.left, prefix_append_right_inj],
exact hl h.right } },
end
lemma is_prefix.reduce_option {l l' : list (option α)} (h : l <+: l') :
l.reduce_option <+: l'.reduce_option :=
h.filter_map id
@[simp] theorem mem_inits : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ inits t ↔ s <+: t
| s [] := suffices s = nil ↔ s <+: nil, by simpa only [inits, mem_singleton],
⟨λh, h.symm ▸ prefix_refl [], eq_nil_of_prefix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) :=
suffices (s = nil ∨ ∃ l ∈ inits t, a :: l = s) ↔ s <+: a :: t, by simpa,
⟨λo, match s, o with
| ._, or.inl rfl := ⟨_, rfl⟩
| s, or.inr ⟨r, hr, hs⟩ := let ⟨s, ht⟩ := (mem_inits _ _).1 hr in
by rw [← hs, ← ht]; exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
end, λmi, match s, mi with
| [], ⟨._, rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| (b::s), ⟨r, hr⟩ := list.no_confusion hr $ λba (st : s++r = t), or.inr $
by rw ba; exact ⟨_, (mem_inits _ _).2 ⟨_, st⟩, rfl⟩
end⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_tails : ∀ (s t : list α), s ∈ tails t ↔ s <:+ t
| s [] := by simp only [tails, mem_singleton];
exact ⟨λh, by rw h; exact suffix_refl [], eq_nil_of_suffix_nil⟩
| s (a::t) := by simp only [tails, mem_cons_iff, mem_tails s t];
exact show s = a :: t ∨ s <:+ t ↔ s <:+ a :: t, from
⟨λo, match s, t, o with
| ._, t, or.inl rfl := suffix_refl _
| s, ._, or.inr ⟨l, rfl⟩ := ⟨a::l, rfl⟩
end, λe, match s, t, e with
| ._, t, ⟨[], rfl⟩ := or.inl rfl
| s, t, ⟨b::l, he⟩ := list.no_confusion he (λab lt, or.inr ⟨l, lt⟩)
end⟩
lemma inits_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : inits (a :: l) = [] :: l.inits.map (λ t, a :: t) :=
by simp
lemma tails_cons (a : α) (l : list α) : tails (a :: l) = (a :: l) :: l.tails :=
by simp
@[simp]
lemma inits_append : ∀ (s t : list α), inits (s ++ t) = s.inits ++ t.inits.tail.map (λ l, s ++ l)
| [] [] := by simp
| [] (a::t) := by simp
| (a::s) t := by simp [inits_append s t]
@[simp]
lemma tails_append : ∀ (s t : list α), tails (s ++ t) = s.tails.map (λ l, l ++ t) ++ t.tails.tail
| [] [] := by simp
| [] (a::t) := by simp
| (a::s) t := by simp [tails_append s t]
-- the lemma names `inits_eq_tails` and `tails_eq_inits` are like `sublists_eq_sublists'`
lemma inits_eq_tails :
∀ (l : list α), l.inits = (reverse $ map reverse $ tails $ reverse l)
| [] := by simp
| (a :: l) := by simp [inits_eq_tails l, map_eq_map_iff]
lemma tails_eq_inits :
∀ (l : list α), l.tails = (reverse $ map reverse $ inits $ reverse l)
| [] := by simp
| (a :: l) := by simp [tails_eq_inits l, append_left_inj]
lemma inits_reverse (l : list α) : inits (reverse l) = reverse (map reverse l.tails) :=
by { rw tails_eq_inits l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma tails_reverse (l : list α) : tails (reverse l) = reverse (map reverse l.inits) :=
by { rw inits_eq_tails l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma map_reverse_inits (l : list α) : map reverse l.inits = (reverse $ tails $ reverse l) :=
by { rw inits_eq_tails l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
lemma map_reverse_tails (l : list α) : map reverse l.tails = (reverse $ inits $ reverse l) :=
by { rw tails_eq_inits l, simp [reverse_involutive.comp_self], }
instance decidable_infix [decidable_eq α] : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), decidable (l₁ <:+: l₂)
| [] l₂ := is_true ⟨[], l₂, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) [] := is_false $ λ⟨s, t, te⟩, absurd te $ append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left _ _ $
append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right _ _ $ λh, list.no_confusion h
| l₁ l₂ := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (list.decidable_bex (λt, l₁ <+: t) (tails l₂)) $
by refine (exists_congr (λt, _)).trans (infix_iff_prefix_suffix _ _).symm;
exact ⟨λ⟨h1, h2⟩, ⟨h2, (mem_tails _ _).1 h1⟩, λ⟨h2, h1⟩, ⟨(mem_tails _ _).2 h1, h2⟩⟩
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem map_sublists'_aux (g : list β → list γ) (l : list α) (f r) :
map g (sublists'_aux l f r) = sublists'_aux l (g ∘ f) (map g r) :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_append (r' : list (list β)) (l : list α) (f r) :
sublists'_aux l f (r ++ r') = sublists'_aux l f r ++ r' :=
by induction l generalizing f r; [refl, simp only [*, sublists'_aux]]
theorem sublists'_aux_eq_sublists' (l f r) :
@sublists'_aux α β l f r = map f (sublists' l) ++ r :=
by rw [sublists', map_sublists'_aux, ← sublists'_aux_append]; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) :=
by rw [sublists', sublists'_aux]; simp only [sublists'_aux_eq_sublists', map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists' {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t :=
begin
induction t with a t IH generalizing s,
{ simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton],
exact ⟨λ h, by rw h, eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩ },
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map],
split; intro h, rcases h with h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩,
{ exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h },
{ exact cons_sublist_cons _ h },
{ cases h with _ _ _ h s _ _ h,
{ exact or.inl h },
{ exact or.inr ⟨s, h, rfl⟩ } }
end
@[simp] theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : list α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by simp only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l, length_map,
length, pow_succ', mul_succ, mul_zero, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] := rfl
theorem sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux : ∀ l (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ l f = sublists_aux l (λ ys r, f ys ++ r)
| [] f := rfl
| (a::l) f := by rw [sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux]; simp only [*, append_assoc]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁ (l : list α) :
sublists_aux l cons = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, [x]) :=
by rw [sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux]; refl
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux {a : α} {l : list α}
(IH₁ : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β), sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(IH₂ : ∀ (f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α)),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons))
(f : list α → list β → list β) : sublists_aux (a::l) f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux (a::l) cons) :=
begin
simp only [sublists_aux, foldr_cons], rw [IH₂, IH₁], congr' 1,
induction sublists_aux l cons with _ _ ih, {refl},
simp only [ih, foldr_cons]
end
theorem sublists_aux_eq_foldr (l : list α) : ∀ (f : list α → list β → list β),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
suffices _ ∧ ∀ f : list α → list (list α) → list (list α),
sublists_aux l f = foldr f [] (sublists_aux l cons),
from this.1,
begin
induction l with a l IH, {split; intro; refl},
exact ⟨sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.1 IH.2,
sublists_aux_eq_foldr.aux IH.2 IH.2⟩
end
theorem sublists_aux_cons_cons (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists_aux (a::l) cons = [a] :: foldr (λys r, ys :: (a :: ys) :: r) [] (sublists_aux l cons) :=
by rw [← sublists_aux_eq_foldr]; refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_append : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α) (f : list α → list β),
sublists_aux₁ (l₁ ++ l₂) f = sublists_aux₁ l₁ f ++
sublists_aux₁ l₂ (λ x, f x ++ sublists_aux₁ l₁ (f ∘ (++ x)))
| [] l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, nil_append, append_nil]
| (a::l₁) l₂ f := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, cons_append, sublists_aux₁_append l₁, append_assoc];
refl
theorem sublists_aux₁_concat (l : list α) (a : α) (f : list α → list β) :
sublists_aux₁ (l ++ [a]) f = sublists_aux₁ l f ++
f [a] ++ sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, f (x ++ [a])) :=
by simp only [sublists_aux₁_append, sublists_aux₁, append_assoc, append_nil]
theorem sublists_aux₁_bind : ∀ (l : list α)
(f : list α → list β) (g : β → list γ),
(sublists_aux₁ l f).bind g = sublists_aux₁ l (λ x, (f x).bind g)
| [] f g := rfl
| (a::l) f g := by simp only [sublists_aux₁, bind_append, sublists_aux₁_bind l]
theorem sublists_aux_cons_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists_aux (l₁ ++ l₂) cons = sublists_aux l₁ cons ++
(do x ← sublists_aux l₂ cons, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
begin
simp only [sublists, sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁, sublists_aux₁_append, bind_eq_bind,
sublists_aux₁_bind],
congr, funext x, apply congr_arg _,
rw [← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind], exact (append_nil _).symm
end
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (do x ← sublists l₂, (++ x) <$> sublists l₁) :=
by simp only [map, sublists, sublists_aux_cons_append, map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind,
cons_bind, map_id', append_nil, cons_append, map_id' (λ _, rfl)]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem sublists_concat (l : list α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (λ x, x ++ [a]) (sublists l) :=
by rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_bind, cons_bind, cons_bind, nil_bind,
map_eq_map, map_eq_map, map_id' (append_nil), append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : list α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [refl,
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_bind, map_map, cons_bind, append_nil, nil_bind, (∘)]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : list α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : list α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id' (reverse_reverse)]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : list α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) :=
by rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists_aux_ne_nil : ∀ (l : list α), [] ∉ sublists_aux l cons
| [] := id
| (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_aux_cons_cons],
refine not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem (cons_ne_nil _ _).symm _,
have := sublists_aux_ne_nil l, revert this,
induction sublists_aux l cons; intro, {rwa foldr},
simp only [foldr, mem_cons_iff, false_or, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨ne_of_not_mem_cons this, ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons this)⟩
end
@[simp] theorem mem_sublists {s t : list α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t :=
by rw [← reverse_sublist_iff, ← mem_sublists',
sublists'_reverse, mem_map_of_injective reverse_injective]
@[simp] theorem length_sublists (l : list α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l :=
by simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_ret_sublist_sublists (l : list α) : map list.ret l <+ sublists l :=
reverse_rec_on l (nil_sublist _) $
λ l a IH, by simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]; exact
((append_sublist_append_left _).2 $ singleton_sublist.2 $
mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by refl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 IH)
/-! ### sublists_len -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
of `f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublists_len_aux {α β : Type*} : ℕ → list α → (list α → β) → list β → list β
| 0 l f r := f [] :: r
| (n+1) [] f r := r
| (n+1) (a::l) f r := sublists_len_aux (n + 1) l f
(sublists_len_aux n l (f ∘ list.cons a) r)
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
`l = [0, 1, 2, 3]` and `n = 2`, one gets
`[[2, 3], [1, 3], [1, 2], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1]]`. -/
def sublists_len {α : Type*} (n : ℕ) (l : list α) : list (list α) :=
sublists_len_aux n l id []
lemma sublists_len_aux_append {α β γ : Type*} :
∀ (n : ℕ) (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (g : β → γ) (r : list β) (s : list γ),
sublists_len_aux n l (g ∘ f) (r.map g ++ s) =
(sublists_len_aux n l f r).map g ++ s
| 0 l f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) [] f g r s := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) f g r s := begin
unfold sublists_len_aux,
rw [show ((g ∘ f) ∘ list.cons a) = (g ∘ f ∘ list.cons a), by refl,
sublists_len_aux_append, sublists_len_aux_append]
end
lemma sublists_len_aux_eq {α β : Type*} (l : list α) (n) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux n l f r = (sublists_len n l).map f ++ r :=
by rw [sublists_len, ← sublists_len_aux_append]; refl
lemma sublists_len_aux_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) (f : list α → β) (r) :
sublists_len_aux 0 l f r = f [] :: r := by cases l; refl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_zero {α : Type*} (l : list α) :
sublists_len 0 l = [[]] := sublists_len_aux_zero _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_nil {α : Type*} (n) :
sublists_len (n+1) (@nil α) = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma sublists_len_succ_cons {α : Type*} (n) (a : α) (l) :
sublists_len (n + 1) (a::l) =
sublists_len (n + 1) l ++ (sublists_len n l).map (cons a) :=
by rw [sublists_len, sublists_len_aux, sublists_len_aux_eq,
sublists_len_aux_eq, map_id, append_nil]; refl
@[simp] lemma length_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
length (sublists_len n l) = nat.choose (length l) n
| 0 l := by simp
| (n+1) [] := by simp
| (n+1) (a::l) := by simp [-add_comm, nat.choose, *]; apply add_comm
lemma sublists_len_sublist_sublists' {α : Type*} : ∀ n (l : list α),
sublists_len n l <+ sublists' l
| 0 l := singleton_sublist.2 (mem_sublists'.2 (nil_sublist _))
| (n+1) [] := nil_sublist _
| (n+1) (a::l) := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, sublists'_cons],
exact (sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).append
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).map _)
end
lemma sublists_len_sublist_of_sublist
{α : Type*} (n) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : sublists_len n l₁ <+ sublists_len n l₂ :=
begin
induction n with n IHn generalizing l₁ l₂, {simp},
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH, {refl},
{ refine IH.trans _,
rw sublists_len_succ_cons,
apply sublist_append_left },
{ simp [sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact IH.append ((IHn s).map _) }
end
lemma length_of_sublists_len {α : Type*} : ∀ {n} {l l' : list α},
l' ∈ sublists_len n l → length l' = n
| 0 l l' (or.inl rfl) := rfl
| (n+1) (a::l) l' h := begin
rw [sublists_len_succ_cons, mem_append, mem_map] at h,
rcases h with h | ⟨l', h, rfl⟩,
{ exact length_of_sublists_len h },
{ exact congr_arg (+1) (length_of_sublists_len h) },
end
lemma mem_sublists_len_self {α : Type*} {l l' : list α}
(h : l' <+ l) : l' ∈ sublists_len (length l') l :=
begin
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ cases l₁ with b l₁,
{ exact or.inl rfl },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_left _ IH } },
{ rw [length, sublists_len_succ_cons],
exact mem_append_right _ (mem_map.2 ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩) }
end
@[simp] lemma mem_sublists_len {α : Type*} {n} {l l' : list α} :
l' ∈ sublists_len n l ↔ l' <+ l ∧ length l' = n :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_sublists'.1
((sublists_len_sublist_sublists' _ _).subset h),
length_of_sublists_len h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ ▸ mem_sublists_len_self h₁⟩
/-! ### permutations -/
section permutations
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_nil (is : list α) : permutations_aux [] is = [] :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]
@[simp] theorem permutations_aux_cons (t : α) (ts is : list α) :
permutations_aux (t :: ts) is = foldr (λy r, (permutations_aux2 t ts r y id).2)
(permutations_aux ts (t::is)) (permutations is) :=
by rw [permutations_aux, permutations_aux.rec]; refl
end permutations
/-! ### insert -/
section insert
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem insert_nil (a : α) : insert a nil = [a] := rfl
theorem insert.def (a : α) (l : list α) : insert a l = if a ∈ l then l else a :: l := rfl
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : insert a l = l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_pos h]
@[simp, priority 970]
theorem insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : insert a l = a :: l :=
by simp only [insert.def, if_neg h]; split; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ insert b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h' : b ∈ l,
{ simp only [insert_of_mem h'],
apply (or_iff_right_of_imp _).symm,
exact λ e, e.symm ▸ h' },
simp only [insert_of_not_mem h', mem_cons_iff]
end
@[simp] theorem suffix_insert (a : α) (l : list α) : l <:+ insert a l :=
by by_cases a ∈ l; [simp only [insert_of_mem h], simp only [insert_of_not_mem h, suffix_cons]]
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ insert a l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) : a ∈ insert b l :=
mem_insert_iff.2 (or.inr h)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {a b : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ insert b l) : a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
mem_insert_iff.1 h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l :=
by rw insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
length (insert a l) = length l + 1 :=
by rw insert_of_not_mem h; refl
end insert
/-! ### erasep -/
section erasep
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
@[simp] theorem erasep_nil : [].erasep p = [] := rfl
theorem erasep_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
(a :: l).erasep p = if p a then l else a :: l.erasep p := rfl
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_pos {a : α} {l : list α} (h : p a) : (a :: l).erasep p = l :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem erasep_cons_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (h : ¬ p a) :
(a::l).erasep p = a :: l.erasep p :=
by simp [erasep_cons, h]
theorem erasep_of_forall_not {l : list α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ¬ p a) : l.erasep p = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih; [refl,
simp [h _ (or.inl rfl), ih (forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons h)]]
theorem exists_of_erasep {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l with b l IH, {cases al},
by_cases pb : p b,
{ exact ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩ },
{ rcases al with rfl | al, {exact pb.elim pa},
rcases IH al with ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
exact ⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw h₃; refl, by simp [pb, h₄]⟩ }
end
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α) :
l.erasep p = l ∨ ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
by_cases h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a,
{ rcases h with ⟨a, ha, pa⟩,
exact or.inr (exists_of_erasep ha pa) },
{ simp at h, exact or.inl (erasep_of_forall_not h) }
end
@[simp] theorem length_erasep_of_mem {l : list α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.erasep p) = pred (length l) :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep al pa with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩;
rw e₂; simp [-add_comm, e₁]; refl
theorem erasep_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁.erasep p ++ l₂
| (x::xs) l₂ h := begin
by_cases h' : p x; simp [h'],
rw erasep_append_left l₂ (mem_of_ne_of_mem (mt _ h') h),
rintro rfl, exact pa
end
theorem erasep_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : list α} (l₂), (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬ p b) → (l₁++l₂).erasep p = l₁ ++ l₂.erasep p
| [] l₂ h := rfl
| (x::xs) l₂ h := by simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1,
erasep_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem erasep_sublist (l : list α) : l.erasep p <+ l :=
by rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩;
[rw h, {rw [h₄, h₃], simp}]
theorem erasep_subset (l : list α) : l.erasep p ⊆ l :=
(erasep_sublist l).subset
theorem sublist.erasep {l₁ l₂ : list α} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erasep p <+ l₂.erasep p :=
begin
induction s,
case list.sublist.slnil { refl },
case list.sublist.cons : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [IH.trans (erasep_sublist _), IH.cons _ _ _] },
case list.sublist.cons2 : l₁ l₂ a s IH {
by_cases h : p a; simp [h],
exacts [s, IH.cons2 _ _ _] }
end
theorem mem_of_mem_erasep {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erasep p → a ∈ l :=
@erasep_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erasep_of_neg {a : α} {l : list α} (pa : ¬ p a) : a ∈ l.erasep p ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨mem_of_mem_erasep, λ al, begin
rcases exists_or_eq_self_of_erasep p l with h | ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩,
{ rwa h },
{ rw h₄, rw h₃ at al,
have : a ≠ c, {rintro rfl, exact pa.elim h₂},
simpa [this] using al }
end⟩
theorem erasep_map (f : β → α) :
∀ (l : list β), (map f l).erasep p = map f (l.erasep (p ∘ f))
| [] := rfl
| (b::l) := by by_cases p (f b); simp [h, erasep_map l]
@[simp] theorem extractp_eq_find_erasep :
∀ l : list α, extractp p l = (find p l, erasep p l)
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by by_cases pa : p a; simp [extractp, pa, extractp_eq_find_erasep l]
end erasep
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem erase_nil (a : α) : [].erase a = [] := rfl
theorem erase_cons (a b : α) (l : list α) :
(b :: l).erase a = if b = a then l else b :: l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (l : list α) : (a :: l).erase a = l :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_pos rfl]
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (l : list α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b::l).erase a = b :: l.erase a :=
by simp only [erase_cons, if_neg h]; split; refl
theorem erase_eq_erasep (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a = l.erasep (eq a) :=
by { induction l with b l, {refl},
by_cases a = b; [simp [h], simp [h, ne.symm h, *]] }
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) : l.erase a = l :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erasep_of_forall_not]; rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem exists_erase_eq {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
by rcases exists_of_erasep h rfl with ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, rfl, h₂, h₃⟩;
rw erase_eq_erasep; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, λ h, h₁ _ h rfl, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = pred (length l) :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact length_erasep_of_mem h rfl
theorem erase_append_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact erasep_append_left (by refl) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (l₂) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁++l₂).erase a = l₁ ++ l₂.erase a :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_append_right];
rintro b h' rfl; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; apply erasep_sublist
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : list α) : l.erase a ⊆ l :=
(erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a :=
by simp [erase_eq_erasep]; exact sublist.erasep h
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ l.erase b → a ∈ l :=
@erase_subset _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {l : list α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
by rw erase_eq_erasep; exact mem_erasep_of_neg ab.symm
theorem erase_comm (a b : α) (l : list α) : (l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a :=
if ab : a = b then by rw ab else
if ha : a ∈ l then
if hb : b ∈ l then match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha, hb with
| ._, ._, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩, hb :=
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
by rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
by rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
else by simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
theorem map_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {a : α}
(l : list α) : map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) :=
by rw [erase_eq_erasep, erase_eq_erasep, erasep_map]; congr;
ext b; simp [finj.eq_iff]
theorem map_foldl_erase [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (foldl list.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (λ l a, l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ :=
by induction l₂ generalizing l₁; [refl,
simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s a) = pred (count a s)
| [] := by simp
| (h :: t) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
by_cases p : h = a,
{ rw [if_pos p, count_cons', if_pos p.symm], simp },
{ rw [if_neg p, count_cons', count_cons', if_neg (λ x : a = h, p x.symm), count_erase_self],
simp, }
end
@[simp] theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
∀ (s : list α), count a (list.erase s b) = count a s
| [] := by simp
| (x :: xs) :=
begin
rw erase_cons,
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [count_cons', h, if_neg ab], simp },
{ rw [count_cons', count_cons', count_erase_of_ne] }
end
end erase
/-! ### diff -/
section diff
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : list α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a::l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ :=
if h : a ∈ l₁ then by simp only [list.diff, if_pos h]
else by simp only [list.diff, if_neg h, erase_of_not_mem h]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : list α) : [].diff l = [] :=
by induction l; [refl, simp only [*, diff_cons, erase_of_not_mem (not_mem_nil _)]]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : list α), l₁.diff l₂ = foldl list.erase l₁ l₂
| l₁ [] := rfl
| l₁ (a::l₂) := (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
@[simp] theorem map_diff [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : injective f) {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) :=
by simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| l₁ [] := sublist.refl _
| l₁ (a::l₂) := calc l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ : diff_cons _ _ _
... <+ l₁.erase a : diff_sublist _ _
... <+ l₁ : list.erase_sublist _ _
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
(diff_sublist _ _).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| l₁ [] h₁ h₂ := h₁
| l₁ (b::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by rw diff_cons; exact
mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne (ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂)).2 h₁) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h₂)
theorem sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃: list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| l₁ l₂ [] h := h
| l₁ l₂ (a::l₃) h := by simp only
[diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α},
l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [] l₂ h := erase_sublist _ _
| (b::l₁) l₂ h := if heq : b = a then by simp only [heq, erase_cons_head, diff_cons]
else by simpa only [erase_cons_head, erase_cons_tail _ heq, diff_cons,
erase_comm a b l₂]
using erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist (h.erase b)
end diff
/-! ### enum -/
theorem length_enum_from : ∀ n (l : list α), length (enum_from n l) = length l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a::l) := congr_arg nat.succ (length_enum_from _ _)
theorem length_enum : ∀ (l : list α), length (enum l) = length l := length_enum_from _
@[simp] theorem enum_from_nth : ∀ n (l : list α) m,
nth (enum_from n l) m = (λ a, (n + m, a)) <$> nth l m
| n [] m := rfl
| n (a :: l) 0 := rfl
| n (a :: l) (m+1) := (enum_from_nth (n+1) l m).trans $
by rw [add_right_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_nth : ∀ (l : list α) n,
nth (enum l) n = (λ a, (n, a)) <$> nth l n :=
by simp only [enum, enum_from_nth, zero_add]; intros; refl
@[simp] theorem enum_from_map_snd : ∀ n (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum_from n l) = l
| n [] := rfl
| n (a :: l) := congr_arg (cons _) (enum_from_map_snd _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_snd : ∀ (l : list α),
map prod.snd (enum l) = l := enum_from_map_snd _
theorem mem_enum_from {x : α} {i : ℕ} :
∀ {j : ℕ} (xs : list α), (i, x) ∈ xs.enum_from j → j ≤ i ∧ i < j + xs.length ∧ x ∈ xs
| j [] := by simp [enum_from]
| j (y :: ys) :=
suffices i = j ∧ x = y ∨ (i, x) ∈ enum_from (j + 1) ys →
j ≤ i ∧ i < j + (length ys + 1) ∧ (x = y ∨ x ∈ ys),
by simpa [enum_from, mem_enum_from ys],
begin
rintro (h|h),
{ refine ⟨le_of_eq h.1.symm,h.1 ▸ _,or.inl h.2⟩,
apply nat.lt_add_of_pos_right; simp },
{ obtain ⟨hji, hijlen, hmem⟩ := mem_enum_from _ h,
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ exact le_trans (nat.le_succ _) hji },
{ convert hijlen using 1, ac_refl },
{ simp [hmem] } }
end
/-! ### product -/
@[simp] theorem nil_product (l : list β) : product (@nil α) l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β)
: product (a::l₁) l₂ = map (λ b, (a, b)) l₂ ++ product l₁ l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem product_nil : ∀ (l : list α), product l (@nil β) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [product_cons, product_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_product {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : list β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ product l₁ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ :=
by simp only [product, mem_bind, mem_map, prod.ext_iff, exists_prop,
and.left_comm, exists_and_distrib_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
length (product l₁ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [exact (zero_mul _).symm,
simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH,
right_distrib, one_mul, length_map, add_comm]]
/-! ### sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
@[simp] theorem nil_sigma (l : Π a, list (σ a)) : (@nil α).sigma l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_cons (a : α) (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a))
: (a::l₁).sigma l₂ = map (sigma.mk a) (l₂ a) ++ l₁.sigma l₂ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sigma_nil : ∀ (l : list α), l.sigma (λ a, @nil (σ a)) = []
| [] := rfl
| (a::l) := by rw [sigma_cons, sigma_nil]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {l₁ : list α} {l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)} {a : α} {b : σ a} :
sigma.mk a b ∈ l₁.sigma l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ a :=
by simp only [list.sigma, mem_bind, mem_map, exists_prop, exists_and_distrib_left,
and.left_comm, exists_eq_left, heq_iff_eq, exists_eq_right]
theorem length_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
length (l₁.sigma l₂) = (l₁.map (λ a, length (l₂ a))).sum :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH; [refl,
simp only [map, sigma_cons, length_append, length_map, IH, sum_cons]]
end
/-! ### disjoint -/
section disjoint
theorem disjoint.symm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : disjoint l₂ l₁
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₂ l₁ :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {l₁ l₂ : list α} : disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
by simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l l₂) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m₁ := d (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : disjoint l₁ l) :
disjoint l₁ l₂
| x m m₁ := d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (list.subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (list.subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : list α) : disjoint [] l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : list α) : disjoint l [] :=
by rw disjoint_comm; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_singleton, forall_eq]; refl
@[simp, priority 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : list α} {a : α} : disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint (l₁++l₂) l ↔ disjoint l₁ l ∧ disjoint l₂ l :=
by simp only [disjoint, mem_append, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} :
disjoint l (l₁++l₂) ↔ disjoint l l₁ ∧ disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ a ∉ l₂ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(@disjoint_append_left _ [a] l₁ l₂).trans $ by simp only [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) ↔ a ∉ l₁ ∧ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp only [disjoint_comm, disjoint_cons_left]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint (l₁++l₂) l) :
disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right {l₁ l₂ l : list α} (d : disjoint l (l₁++l₂)) :
disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_take_drop {l : list α} {m n : ℕ} (hl : l.nodup) (h : m ≤ n) :
disjoint (l.take m) (l.drop n) :=
begin
induction l generalizing m n,
case list.nil : m n
{ simp },
case list.cons : x xs xs_ih m n
{ cases m; cases n; simp only [disjoint_cons_left, mem_cons_iff, disjoint_cons_right, drop,
true_or, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and,
disjoint_nil_left, take],
{ cases h },
cases hl with _ _ h₀ h₁, split,
{ intro h, exact h₀ _ (mem_of_mem_drop h) rfl, },
solve_by_elim [le_of_succ_le_succ] { max_depth := 4 } },
end
end disjoint
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : list α) : [] ∪ l = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_union (l₁ l₂ : list α) (a : α) : a :: l₁ ∪ l₂ = insert a (l₁ ∪ l₂) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ :=
by induction l₁; simp only [nil_union, not_mem_nil, false_or, cons_union, mem_insert_iff,
mem_cons_iff, or_assoc, *]
theorem mem_union_left {a : α} {l₁ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : list α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union.2 (or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : list α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [] l₂ := ⟨[], by refl, rfl⟩
| (a::l₁) l₂ := let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂
then ⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else ⟨a::t, cons_sublist_cons _ s, by simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h];
split; refl⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp (λ a, and.right)
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂ in
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α} :
(∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :=
by simp only [mem_union, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
end union
/-! ### inter -/
section inter
variable [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem inter_nil (l : list α) : [] ∩ l = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
if_pos h
@[simp] theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α} (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a::l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
if_neg h
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₂ :=
of_mem_filter
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem {l₁ l₂ : list α} {a : α} : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem
@[simp] theorem mem_inter {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂ :=
mem_filter
theorem inter_subset_left (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset _
theorem inter_subset_right (l₁ l₂ : list α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ :=
λ a, mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
λ a h, mem_inter.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint {l₁ l₂ : list α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter, not_and]; refl
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left {p : α → Prop} {l₁ : list α} (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x)
(l₂ : list α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right {p : α → Prop} (l₁ : list α) {l₂ : list α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
ball.imp_left (λ x, mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
@[simp] lemma inter_reverse {xs ys : list α} :
xs.inter ys.reverse = xs.inter ys :=
by simp only [list.inter, mem_reverse]; congr
end inter
section choose
variables (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (l : list α)
lemma choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_x p l hp).property
lemma choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l := (choose_spec _ _ _).1
lemma choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) := (choose_spec _ _ _).2
end choose
/-! ### map₂_left' -/
section map₂_left'
-- The definitional equalities for `map₂_left'` can already be used by the
-- simplifie because `map₂_left'` is marked `@[simp]`.
@[simp] theorem map₂_left'_nil_right (f : α → option β → γ) (as) :
map₂_left' f as [] = (as.map (λ a, f a none), []) :=
by cases as; refl
end map₂_left'
/-! ### map₂_right' -/
section map₂_right'
variables (f : option α → β → γ) (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_left :
map₂_right' f [] bs = (bs.map (f none), []) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_right :
map₂_right' f as [] = ([], as) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_nil_cons :
map₂_right' f [] (b :: bs) = (f none b :: bs.map (f none), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right'_cons_cons :
map₂_right' f (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := map₂_right' f as bs in
(f (some a) b :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end map₂_right'
/-! ### zip_left' -/
section zip_left'
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_nil_right :
zip_left' as ([] : list β) = (as.map (λ a, (a, none)), []) :=
by cases as; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_nil_left :
zip_left' ([] : list α) bs = ([], bs) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_cons_nil :
zip_left' (a :: as) ([] : list β) = ((a, none) :: as.map (λ a, (a, none)), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left'_cons_cons :
zip_left' (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := zip_left' as bs in
((a, some b) :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end zip_left'
/-! ### zip_right' -/
section zip_right'
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_left :
zip_right' ([] : list α) bs = (bs.map (λ b, (none, b)), []) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_right :
zip_right' as ([] : list β) = ([], as) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_nil_cons :
zip_right' ([] : list α) (b :: bs) = ((none, b) :: bs.map (λ b, (none, b)), []) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right'_cons_cons :
zip_right' (a :: as) (b :: bs) =
let rec := zip_right' as bs in
((some a, b) :: rec.fst, rec.snd) :=
rfl
end zip_right'
/-! ### map₂_left -/
section map₂_left
variables (f : α → option β → γ) (as : list α)
-- The definitional equalities for `map₂_left` can already be used by the
-- simplifier because `map₂_left` is marked `@[simp]`.
@[simp] theorem map₂_left_nil_right :
map₂_left f as [] = as.map (λ a, f a none) :=
by cases as; refl
theorem map₂_left_eq_map₂_left' : ∀ as bs,
map₂_left f as bs = (map₂_left' f as bs).fst
| [] bs := by simp!
| (a :: as) [] := by simp!
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) := by simp! [*]
theorem map₂_left_eq_map₂ : ∀ as bs,
length as ≤ length bs →
map₂_left f as bs = map₂ (λ a b, f a (some b)) as bs
| [] [] h := by simp!
| [] (b :: bs) h := by simp!
| (a :: as) [] h := by { simp at h, contradiction }
| (a :: as) (b :: bs) h := by { simp at h, simp! [*] }
end map₂_left
/-! ### map₂_right -/
section map₂_right
variables (f : option α → β → γ) (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_left :
map₂_right f [] bs = bs.map (f none) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_right :
map₂_right f as [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_nil_cons :
map₂_right f [] (b :: bs) = f none b :: bs.map (f none) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map₂_right_cons_cons :
map₂_right f (a :: as) (b :: bs) = f (some a) b :: map₂_right f as bs :=
rfl
theorem map₂_right_eq_map₂_right' :
map₂_right f as bs = (map₂_right' f as bs).fst :=
by simp only [map₂_right, map₂_right', map₂_left_eq_map₂_left']
theorem map₂_right_eq_map₂ (h : length bs ≤ length as) :
map₂_right f as bs = map₂ (λ a b, f (some a) b) as bs :=
begin
have : (λ a b, flip f a (some b)) = (flip (λ a b, f (some a) b)) := rfl,
simp only [map₂_right, map₂_left_eq_map₂, map₂_flip, *]
end
end map₂_right
/-! ### zip_left -/
section zip_left
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_left_nil_right :
zip_left as ([] : list β) = as.map (λ a, (a, none)) :=
by cases as; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_nil_left :
zip_left ([] : list α) bs = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_cons_nil :
zip_left (a :: as) ([] : list β) = (a, none) :: as.map (λ a, (a, none)) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_left_cons_cons :
zip_left (a :: as) (b :: bs) = (a, some b) :: zip_left as bs :=
rfl
theorem zip_left_eq_zip_left' :
zip_left as bs = (zip_left' as bs).fst :=
by simp only [zip_left, zip_left', map₂_left_eq_map₂_left']
end zip_left
/-! ### zip_right -/
section zip_right
variables (a : α) (as : list α) (b : β) (bs : list β)
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_left :
zip_right ([] : list α) bs = bs.map (λ b, (none, b)) :=
by cases bs; refl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_right :
zip_right as ([] : list β) = [] :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_nil_cons :
zip_right ([] : list α) (b :: bs) = (none, b) :: bs.map (λ b, (none, b)) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem zip_right_cons_cons :
zip_right (a :: as) (b :: bs) = (some a, b) :: zip_right as bs :=
rfl
theorem zip_right_eq_zip_right' :
zip_right as bs = (zip_right' as bs).fst :=
by simp only [zip_right, zip_right', map₂_right_eq_map₂_right']
end zip_right
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem ilast'_mem : ∀ a l, @ilast' α a l ∈ a :: l
| a [] := or.inl rfl
| a (b::l) := or.inr (ilast'_mem b l)
@[simp] lemma nth_le_attach (L : list α) (i) (H : i < L.attach.length) :
(L.attach.nth_le i H).1 = L.nth_le i (length_attach L ▸ H) :=
calc (L.attach.nth_le i H).1
= (L.attach.map subtype.val).nth_le i (by simpa using H) : by rw nth_le_map'
... = L.nth_le i _ : by congr; apply attach_map_val
end list
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.map_list_prod {α β : Type*} [monoid α] [monoid β] (f : α →* β) (l : list α) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
(l.prod_hom f).symm
namespace list
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_map_hom {α β γ : Type*} [monoid β] [monoid γ] (L : list α) (f : α → β) (g : β →* γ) :
(L.map (g ∘ f)).prod = g ((L.map f).prod) :=
by {rw g.map_list_prod, exact congr_arg _ (map_map _ _ _).symm}
theorem sum_map_mul_left {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, r * f b)).sum = r * (L.map f).sum :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_left r
theorem sum_map_mul_right {α : Type*} [semiring α] {β : Type*} (L : list β)
(f : β → α) (r : α) :
(L.map (λ b, f b * r)).sum = (L.map f).sum * r :=
sum_map_hom L f $ add_monoid_hom.mul_right r
universes u v
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_swap {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (x : α) (y : β) (xs : list (α × β)) :
(y, x) ∈ map prod.swap xs ↔ (x, y) ∈ xs :=
begin
induction xs with x xs,
{ simp only [not_mem_nil, map_nil] },
{ cases x with a b,
simp only [mem_cons_iff, prod.mk.inj_iff, map, prod.swap_prod_mk, prod.exists, xs_ih],
tauto! },
end
lemma slice_eq {α} (xs : list α) (n m : ℕ) :
slice n m xs = xs.take n ++ xs.drop (n+m) :=
begin
induction n generalizing xs,
{ simp [slice] },
{ cases xs; simp [slice, *, nat.succ_add], }
end
lemma sizeof_slice_lt {α} [has_sizeof α] (i j : ℕ) (hj : 0 < j) (xs : list α) (hi : i < xs.length) :
sizeof (list.slice i j xs) < sizeof xs :=
begin
induction xs generalizing i j,
case list.nil : i j h
{ cases hi },
case list.cons : x xs xs_ih i j h
{ cases i; simp only [-slice_eq, list.slice],
{ cases j, cases h,
dsimp only [drop], unfold_wf,
apply @lt_of_le_of_lt _ _ _ xs.sizeof,
{ clear_except,
induction xs generalizing j; unfold_wf,
case list.nil : j
{ refl },
case list.cons : xs_hd xs_tl xs_ih j
{ cases j; unfold_wf, refl,
transitivity, apply xs_ih,
simp }, },
unfold_wf, apply zero_lt_one_add, },
{ unfold_wf, apply xs_ih _ _ h,
apply lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi, } },
end
end list
|
3fb083519af5e434618913db2fe5475275d03084 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/tactic/default_auto.lean | d811f9d36310370eb17d08f41eba8d81a105e319 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,337 | lean | /-
This file imports many useful tactics ("the kitchen sink").
You can use `import tactic` at the beginning of your file to get everything.
(Although you may want to strip things down when you're polishing.)
Because this file imports some complicated tactics, it has many transitive dependencies
(which of course may not use `import tactic`, and must import selectively).
As (non-exhaustive) examples, these includes things like:
* algebra.group_power
* algebra.ordered_ring
* data.rat
* data.nat.prime
* data.list.perm
* data.set.lattice
* data.equiv.encodable.basic
* order.complete_lattice
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.tactic.basic
import Mathlib.tactic.abel
import Mathlib.tactic.ring_exp
import Mathlib.tactic.noncomm_ring
import Mathlib.tactic.linarith.default
import Mathlib.tactic.omega.default
import Mathlib.tactic.tfae
import Mathlib.tactic.apply_fun
import Mathlib.tactic.interval_cases
import Mathlib.tactic.reassoc_axiom
import Mathlib.tactic.slice
import Mathlib.tactic.subtype_instance
import Mathlib.tactic.derive_fintype
import Mathlib.tactic.group
import Mathlib.tactic.cancel_denoms
import Mathlib.tactic.zify
import Mathlib.tactic.transport
import Mathlib.tactic.unfold_cases
import Mathlib.tactic.field_simp
import Mathlib.PostPort
namespace Mathlib
end Mathlib |
1008db8249cedb421071bcbfdc19775964672121 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /src/Init/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Intro.lean | e0397c338557c7cbf3fb6a19303290e151926335 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,402 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Lean.Meta.Tactic.Util
namespace Lean
namespace Meta
@[specialize]
def introNCoreAux {σ} (mvarId : MVarId) (mkName : LocalContext → Name → σ → Name × σ)
: Nat → LocalContext → Array Expr → Nat → σ → Expr → MetaM (Array Expr × MVarId)
| 0, lctx, fvars, j, _, type =>
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
adaptReader (fun (ctx : Context) => { lctx := lctx, .. ctx }) $
withNewLocalInstances isClassExpensive fvars j $ do
tag ← getMVarTag mvarId;
let type := type.headBeta;
newMVar ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar type tag;
lctx ← getLCtx;
newVal ← mkLambda fvars newMVar;
assignExprMVar mvarId newVal;
pure $ (fvars, newMVar.mvarId!)
| (i+1), lctx, fvars, j, s, Expr.letE n type val body _ => do
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
let type := type.headBeta;
let val := val.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
fvarId ← mkFreshId;
let (n, s) := mkName lctx n s;
let lctx := lctx.mkLetDecl fvarId n type val;
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId;
let fvars := fvars.push fvar;
introNCoreAux i lctx fvars j s body
| (i+1), lctx, fvars, j, s, Expr.forallE n type body c => do
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
let type := type.headBeta;
fvarId ← mkFreshId;
let (n, s) := mkName lctx n s;
let lctx := lctx.mkLocalDecl fvarId n type c.binderInfo;
let fvar := mkFVar fvarId;
let fvars := fvars.push fvar;
introNCoreAux i lctx fvars j s body
| (i+1), lctx, fvars, j, s, type =>
let type := type.instantiateRevRange j fvars.size fvars;
adaptReader (fun (ctx : Context) => { lctx := lctx, .. ctx }) $
withNewLocalInstances isClassExpensive fvars j $ do
newType ← whnf type;
if newType.isForall then
introNCoreAux i lctx fvars fvars.size s newType
else
throwTacticEx `introN mvarId "insufficient number of binders"
@[specialize] def introNCore {σ} (mvarId : MVarId) (n : Nat) (mkName : LocalContext → Name → σ → Name × σ) (s : σ) : MetaM (Array FVarId × MVarId) :=
withMVarContext mvarId $ do
checkNotAssigned mvarId `introN;
mvarType ← getMVarType mvarId;
lctx ← getLCtx;
(fvars, mvarId) ← introNCoreAux mvarId mkName n lctx #[] 0 s mvarType;
pure (fvars.map Expr.fvarId!, mvarId)
def mkAuxName (useUnusedNames : Bool) (lctx : LocalContext) (defaultName : Name) : List Name → Name × List Name
| [] => (if useUnusedNames then lctx.getUnusedName defaultName else defaultName, [])
| n :: rest => (if n != "_" then n else if useUnusedNames then lctx.getUnusedName defaultName else defaultName, rest)
def introN (mvarId : MVarId) (n : Nat) (givenNames : List Name := []) (useUnusedNames := true) : MetaM (Array FVarId × MVarId) :=
introNCore mvarId n (mkAuxName useUnusedNames) givenNames
def intro (mvarId : MVarId) (name : Name) : MetaM (FVarId × MVarId) := do
(fvarIds, mvarId) ← introN mvarId 1 [name];
pure (fvarIds.get! 0, mvarId)
def intro1 (mvarId : MVarId) (useUnusedNames := true) : MetaM (FVarId × MVarId) := do
(fvarIds, mvarId) ← introN mvarId 1 [] useUnusedNames;
pure (fvarIds.get! 0, mvarId)
end Meta
end Lean
|
bfbf314b5d2d946cdb5f99f55edb90eb3021beef | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /stage0/src/Init/Data/Stream.lean | e634751af18038b7ed7750dfa7ebbfdc0e0edc68 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,199 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Andrew Kent, Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Subarray
import Init.Data.Range
/-
Remark: we considered using the following alternative design
```
structure Stream (α : Type u) where
stream : Type u
next? : stream → Option (α × stream)
class ToStream (collection : Type u) (value : outParam (Type v)) where
toStream : collection → Stream value
```
where `Stream` is not a class, and its state is encapsulated.
The key problem is that the type `Stream α` "lives" in a universe higher than `α`.
This is a problem because we want to use `Stream`s in monadic code.
-/
/-
Streams are used to implement parallel `for` statements.
Example:
```
for x in xs, y in ys do
...
```
is expanded into
```
let mut s := toStream ys
for x in xs do
match Stream.next? s with
| none => break
| some (y, s') =>
s := s'
...
```
-/
class ToStream (collection : Type u) (stream : outParam (Type u)) : Type u where
toStream : collection → stream
export ToStream (toStream)
class Stream (stream : Type u) (value : outParam (Type v)) : Type (max u v) where
next? : stream → Option (value × stream)
protected partial def Stream.forIn [Stream ρ α] [Monad m] (s : ρ) (b : β) (f : α → β → m (ForInStep β)) : m β := do
let inst : Inhabited (m β) := ⟨pure b⟩
let rec visit (s : ρ) (b : β) : m β := do
match Stream.next? s with
| some (a, s) => match (← f a b) with
| ForInStep.done b => return b
| ForInStep.yield b => visit s b
| none => return b
visit s b
instance (priority := low) [Stream ρ α] : ForIn m ρ α where
forIn := Stream.forIn
instance : ToStream (List α) (List α) where
toStream c := c
instance : ToStream (Array α) (Subarray α) where
toStream a := a[:a.size]
instance : ToStream (Subarray α) (Subarray α) where
toStream a := a
instance : ToStream String Substring where
toStream s := s.toSubstring
instance : ToStream Std.Range Std.Range where
toStream r := r
instance [Stream ρ α] [Stream γ β] : Stream (ρ × γ) (α × β) where
next?
| (s₁, s₂) =>
match Stream.next? s₁ with
| none => none
| some (a, s₁) => match Stream.next? s₂ with
| none => none
| some (b, s₂) => some ((a, b), (s₁, s₂))
instance : Stream (List α) α where
next?
| [] => none
| a::as => some (a, as)
instance : Stream (Subarray α) α where
next? s :=
if h : s.start < s.stop then
have : s.start + 1 ≤ s.stop := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h
some (s.as.get ⟨s.start, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h s.h₂⟩, { s with start := s.start + 1, h₁ := this })
else
none
instance : Stream Std.Range Nat where
next? r :=
if r.start < r.stop then
some (r.start, { r with start := r.start + r.step })
else
none
instance : Stream Substring Char where
next? s :=
if s.startPos < s.stopPos then
some (s.str.get s.startPos, { s with startPos := s.str.next s.startPos })
else
none
|
53e7e2eb3f84524854cd2701f99cddbc83b42906 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/category_theory/fully_faithful.lean | 86ce61be785161a920904f9c2e18ba9e72e1c317 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,178 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import logic.function.basic
import category_theory.natural_isomorphism
universes v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
/--
A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is full if for each `X Y : C`, `F.map` is surjective.
In fact, we use a constructive definition, so the `full F` typeclass contains data,
specifying a particular preimage of each `f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y`.
-/
class full (F : C ⥤ D) :=
(preimage : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : (F.obj X) ⟶ (F.obj Y)), X ⟶ Y)
(witness' : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : (F.obj X) ⟶ (F.obj Y)), F.map (preimage f) = f . obviously)
restate_axiom full.witness'
attribute [simp] full.witness
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is faithful if for each `X Y : C`, `F.map` is injective.-/
class faithful (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop :=
(injectivity' [] : ∀ {X Y : C}, function.injective (@functor.map _ _ _ _ F X Y) . obviously)
restate_axiom faithful.injectivity'
namespace functor
lemma injectivity (F : C ⥤ D) [faithful F] {X Y : C} :
function.injective $ @functor.map _ _ _ _ F X Y :=
faithful.injectivity F
/-- The specified preimage of a morphism under a full functor. -/
def preimage (F : C ⥤ D) [full F] {X Y : C} (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) : X ⟶ Y :=
full.preimage.{v₁ v₂} f
@[simp] lemma image_preimage (F : C ⥤ D) [full F] {X Y : C} (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) :
F.map (preimage F f) = f :=
by unfold preimage; obviously
end functor
variables {F : C ⥤ D} [full F] [faithful F] {X Y Z : C}
@[simp] lemma preimage_id : F.preimage (𝟙 (F.obj X)) = 𝟙 X :=
F.injectivity (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_comp (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) (g : F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj Z) :
F.preimage (f ≫ g) = F.preimage f ≫ F.preimage g :=
F.injectivity (by simp)
@[simp] lemma preimage_map (f : X ⟶ Y) :
F.preimage (F.map f) = f :=
F.injectivity (by simp)
/-- If `F : C ⥤ D` is fully faithful, every isomorphism `F.obj X ≅ F.obj Y` has a preimage. -/
def preimage_iso (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) : X ≅ Y :=
{ hom := F.preimage f.hom,
inv := F.preimage f.inv,
hom_inv_id' := F.injectivity (by simp),
inv_hom_id' := F.injectivity (by simp), }
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_hom (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) :
(preimage_iso f).hom = F.preimage f.hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_inv (f : (F.obj X) ≅ (F.obj Y)) :
(preimage_iso f).inv = F.preimage (f.inv) := rfl
@[simp] lemma preimage_iso_map_iso (f : X ≅ Y) : preimage_iso (F.map_iso f) = f :=
by tidy
variables (F)
def is_iso_of_fully_faithful (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso (F.map f)] : is_iso f :=
{ inv := F.preimage (inv (F.map f)),
hom_inv_id' := F.injectivity (by simp),
inv_hom_id' := F.injectivity (by simp) }
end category_theory
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
instance full.id : full (𝟭 C) :=
{ preimage := λ _ _ f, f }
instance faithful.id : faithful (𝟭 C) := by obviously
variables {D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D] {E : Type u₃} [category.{v₃} E]
variables (F F' : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
instance faithful.comp [faithful F] [faithful G] : faithful (F ⋙ G) :=
{ injectivity' := λ _ _ _ _ p, F.injectivity (G.injectivity p) }
lemma faithful.of_comp [faithful $ F ⋙ G] : faithful F :=
{ injectivity' := λ X Y, (F ⋙ G).injectivity.of_comp }
section
variables {F F'}
lemma faithful.of_iso [faithful F] (α : F ≅ F') : faithful F' :=
{ injectivity' := λ X Y f f' h, F.injectivity
(by rw [←nat_iso.naturality_1 α.symm, h, nat_iso.naturality_1 α.symm]) }
end
variables {F G}
lemma faithful.of_comp_iso {H : C ⥤ E} [ℋ : faithful H] (h : F ⋙ G ≅ H) : faithful F :=
@faithful.of_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ F G (faithful.of_iso h.symm)
alias faithful.of_comp_iso ← category_theory.iso.faithful_of_comp
-- We could prove this from `faithful.of_comp_iso` using `eq_to_iso`,
-- but that would introduce a cyclic import.
lemma faithful.of_comp_eq {H : C ⥤ E} [ℋ : faithful H] (h : F ⋙ G = H) : faithful F :=
@faithful.of_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ F G (h.symm ▸ ℋ)
alias faithful.of_comp_eq ← eq.faithful_of_comp
variables (F G)
/-- “Divide” a functor by a faithful functor. -/
protected def faithful.div (F : C ⥤ E) (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
C ⥤ D :=
{ obj := obj,
map := @map,
map_id' :=
begin
assume X,
apply G.injectivity,
apply eq_of_heq,
transitivity F.map (𝟙 X), from h_map,
rw [F.map_id, G.map_id, h_obj X]
end,
map_comp' :=
begin
assume X Y Z f g,
apply G.injectivity,
apply eq_of_heq,
transitivity F.map (f ≫ g), from h_map,
rw [F.map_comp, G.map_comp],
congr' 1;
try { exact (h_obj _).symm };
exact h_map.symm
end }
lemma faithful.div_comp (F : C ⥤ E) [faithful F] (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
(faithful.div F G obj @h_obj @map @h_map) ⋙ G = F :=
begin
tactic.unfreeze_local_instances,
cases F with F_obj _ _ _; cases G with G_obj _ _ _,
unfold faithful.div functor.comp,
unfold_projs at h_obj,
have: F_obj = G_obj ∘ obj := (funext h_obj).symm,
subst this,
congr,
funext,
exact eq_of_heq h_map
end
lemma faithful.div_faithful (F : C ⥤ E) [faithful F] (G : D ⥤ E) [faithful G]
(obj : C → D) (h_obj : ∀ X, G.obj (obj X) = F.obj X)
(map : Π {X Y}, (X ⟶ Y) → (obj X ⟶ obj Y))
(h_map : ∀ {X Y} {f : X ⟶ Y}, G.map (map f) == F.map f) :
faithful (faithful.div F G obj @h_obj @map @h_map) :=
(faithful.div_comp F G _ h_obj _ @h_map).faithful_of_comp
instance full.comp [full F] [full G] : full (F ⋙ G) :=
{ preimage := λ _ _ f, F.preimage (G.preimage f) }
end category_theory
|
2e6c2e370dedaff3d9261fe42b5d16695426f025 | f3be49eddff7edf577d3d3666e314d995f7a6357 | /TBA/While/Semantics.lean | 54c1d152097c425c6809142fdb172c6eac6ea815 | [] | no_license | IPDSnelting/tba-2021 | 8b930bcd2f4aae44a2ddc86e72b77f84e6d46e82 | b6390e55b768423d3266969e81d19290129c5914 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,754,693,583 | 1,625,135,602,000 | 1,625,136,365,000 | 355,124,341 | 50 | 7 | null | 1,625,133,762,000 | 1,617,699,824,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,089 | lean | /- Semantics -/
import TBA.While.Com
namespace While
open Com
abbrev Map (α β : Type) := α → Option β
namespace Map
def empty : Map α β := fun k => none
def update [DecidableEq α] (m : Map α β) (k : α) (v : Option β) : Map α β :=
fun k' => if k = k' then v else m k'
notation:max m "[" k " ↦ " v "]" => update m k v
end Map
abbrev State := Map VName Val
namespace Expr
variable (σ : State) in
def eval : Expr → Option Val
| Expr.const v => some v
| Expr.var x => σ x
| Expr.binop e₁ op e₂ => match eval e₁, eval e₂ with
| some v₁, some v₂ => op.eval v₁ v₂ -- BinOp.eval : BinOp → Val → Val → Option Val
| _, _ => none
def time : Expr → Nat
| Expr.const v => 1
| Expr.var x => 1
| Expr.binop e₁ op e₂ => time e₁ + time e₂ + 1
end Expr
open Expr
section
set_option hygiene false -- HACK: allow forward reference in notation
-- note the `local` to make the hacky notation local to the current section
local notation:60 "⟨" c ", " σ "⟩" " ⇓ " σ' " : " t:60 => Bigstep c σ σ' t
inductive Bigstep : Com → State → State → Nat → Prop where
| skip :
⟨skip, σ⟩ ⇓ σ : 1
| ass :
⟨x ::= e, σ⟩ ⇓ σ[x ↦ e.eval σ] : e.time + 1
| seq (h₁ : ⟨c₁, σ⟩ ⇓ σ' : t₁) (h₂ : ⟨c₂, σ'⟩ ⇓ σ'' : t₂) :
⟨c₁;; c₂, σ⟩ ⇓ σ'' : t₁ + t₂ + 1
| ifTrue (hb : eval σ b = true) (ht : ⟨cₜ, σ⟩ ⇓ σ' : t) :
⟨cond b cₜ cₑ, σ⟩ ⇓ σ' : b.time + t + 1
| ifFalse (hb : eval σ b = false) (he : ⟨cₑ, σ⟩ ⇓ σ' : t) :
⟨cond b cₜ cₑ, σ⟩ ⇓ σ' : b.time + t + 1
| whileTrue (hb : eval σ b = true) (hc : ⟨c, σ⟩ ⇓ σ' : t₁) (hind : ⟨while b c, σ'⟩ ⇓ σ'' : t₂) :
⟨while b c, σ⟩ ⇓ σ'' : b.time + t₁ + t₂ + 1
| whileFalse (hb : eval σ b = false) :
⟨while b c, σ⟩ ⇓ σ : b.time + 1
end
-- redeclare "proper" notation with working pretty printer
notation:60 "⟨" c ", " σ "⟩" " ⇓ " σ' " : " t:60 => Bigstep c σ σ' t
end While
|
ad948ad050800032f2ed9c1d43bcbf5c4b281dd5 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /tests/lean/notation4.lean | 41c90e4df2dc557d2b216631339e0f35cbdfae40 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 309 | lean | --
open sigma
inductive List (T : Type) : Type | nil {} : List | cons : T → List → List open List notation h :: t := cons h t notation `[` l:(foldr `,` (h t, cons h t) nil) `]` := l
check ∃ (A : Type) (x y : A), x = y
check ∃ (x : num), x = 0
check Σ (x : num), x = 10
check Σ (A : Type), List A
|
4648ac435658b600fd00e2b61d7552cd99f74cd0 | ad0c7d243dc1bd563419e2767ed42fb323d7beea | /group_theory/order_of_element.lean | 68bebe9dc20a33a571b506a9b0c940ee10b5f038 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sebzim4500/mathlib | e0b5a63b1655f910dee30badf09bd7e191d3cf30 | 6997cafbd3a7325af5cb318561768c316ceb7757 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,549,958,618 | 1,538,221,723,000 | 1,538,221,723,000 | 150,869,076 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,538,229,323,000 | 1,538,229,323,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,388 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.set.finite group_theory.coset
open set function
variables {α : Type*} {s : set α} {a a₁ a₂ b c: α}
-- TODO this lemma isn't used anywhere in this file, and should be moved elsewhere.
namespace finset
open finset
lemma mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq [decidable_eq α] {f : ℤ → α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}
(hn : 0 < n) (h : ∀i, f (i % n) = f i) :
a ∈ set.range f ↔ a ∈ (finset.range n).image (λi, f i) :=
suffices (∃i, f (i % n) = a) ↔ ∃i, i < n ∧ f ↑i = a, by simpa [h],
have hn' : 0 < (n : ℤ), from int.coe_nat_lt.mpr hn,
iff.intro
(assume ⟨i, hi⟩,
have 0 ≤ i % ↑n, from int.mod_nonneg _ (ne_of_gt hn'),
⟨int.to_nat (i % n),
by rw [←int.coe_nat_lt, int.to_nat_of_nonneg this]; exact ⟨int.mod_lt_of_pos i hn', hi⟩⟩)
(assume ⟨i, hi, ha⟩,
⟨i, by rw [int.mod_eq_of_lt (int.coe_zero_le _) (int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt hi), ha]⟩)
end finset
section order_of
variables [group α] [fintype α] [decidable_eq α]
lemma exists_gpow_eq_one (a : α) : ∃i≠0, a ^ (i:ℤ) = 1 :=
have ¬ injective (λi, a ^ i),
from not_injective_int_fintype,
let ⟨i, j, a_eq, ne⟩ := show ∃(i j : ℤ), a ^ i = a ^ j ∧ i ≠ j,
by rw [injective] at this; simpa [classical.not_forall] in
have a ^ (i - j) = 1,
by simp [gpow_add, gpow_neg, a_eq],
⟨i - j, sub_ne_zero.mpr ne, this⟩
lemma exists_pow_eq_one (a : α) : ∃i > 0, a ^ i = 1 :=
let ⟨i, hi, eq⟩ := exists_gpow_eq_one a in
begin
cases i,
{ exact ⟨i, nat.pos_of_ne_zero (by simp [int.of_nat_eq_coe, *] at *), eq⟩ },
{ exact ⟨i + 1, dec_trivial, inv_eq_one.1 eq⟩ }
end
/-- `order_of a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `a ^ n = 1` -/
def order_of (a : α) : ℕ := nat.find (exists_pow_eq_one a)
lemma pow_order_of_eq_one (a : α) : a ^ order_of a = 1 :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := nat.find_spec (exists_pow_eq_one a) in h₂
lemma order_of_pos (a : α) : order_of a > 0 :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := nat.find_spec (exists_pow_eq_one a) in h₁
private lemma pow_injective_aux {n m : ℕ} (a : α) (h : n ≤ m)
(hn : n < order_of a) (hm : m < order_of a) (eq : a ^ n = a ^ m) : n = m :=
decidable.by_contradiction $ assume ne : n ≠ m,
have h₁ : m - n > 0, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero (by simp [nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add h, ne.symm]),
have h₂ : a ^ (m - n) = 1, by simp [pow_sub _ h, eq],
have le : order_of a ≤ m - n, from nat.find_min' (exists_pow_eq_one a) ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
have lt : m - n < order_of a,
from (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add h).mpr $ nat.lt_add_left _ _ _ hm,
lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_le_of_lt le lt)
lemma pow_injective_of_lt_order_of {n m : ℕ} (a : α)
(hn : n < order_of a) (hm : m < order_of a) (eq : a ^ n = a ^ m) : n = m :=
(le_total n m).elim
(assume h, pow_injective_aux a h hn hm eq)
(assume h, (pow_injective_aux a h hm hn eq.symm).symm)
lemma order_of_le_card_univ : order_of a ≤ fintype.card α :=
finset.card_le_of_inj_on ((^) a)
(assume n _, fintype.complete _)
(assume i j, pow_injective_of_lt_order_of a)
lemma pow_eq_mod_order_of {n : ℕ} : a ^ n = a ^ (n % order_of a) :=
calc a ^ n = a ^ (n % order_of a + order_of a * (n / order_of a)) :
by rw [nat.mod_add_div]
... = a ^ (n % order_of a) :
by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one]
lemma gpow_eq_mod_order_of {i : ℤ} : a ^ i = a ^ (i % order_of a) :=
calc a ^ i = a ^ (i % order_of a + order_of a * (i / order_of a)) :
by rw [int.mod_add_div]
... = a ^ (i % order_of a) :
by simp [gpow_add, gpow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one]
lemma mem_gpowers_iff_mem_range_order_of {a a' : α} :
a' ∈ gpowers a ↔ a' ∈ (finset.range (order_of a)).image ((^) a : ℕ → α) :=
finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq
(order_of_pos a)
(assume i, gpow_eq_mod_order_of.symm)
instance decidable_gpowers : decidable_pred (gpowers a) :=
assume a', decidable_of_iff'
(a' ∈ (finset.range (order_of a)).image ((^) a))
mem_gpowers_iff_mem_range_order_of
section
local attribute [instance] set_fintype
lemma order_eq_card_gpowers : order_of a = fintype.card (gpowers a) :=
begin
refine (finset.card_eq_of_bijective _ _ _ _).symm,
{ exact λn hn, ⟨gpow a n, ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩ },
{ exact assume ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ _,
have pos: (0:int) < order_of a,
from int.coe_nat_lt.mpr $ order_of_pos a,
have 0 ≤ i % (order_of a),
from int.mod_nonneg _ $ ne_of_gt pos,
⟨int.to_nat (i % order_of a),
by rw [← int.coe_nat_lt, int.to_nat_of_nonneg this];
exact ⟨int.mod_lt_of_pos _ pos, subtype.eq gpow_eq_mod_order_of.symm⟩⟩ },
{ intros, exact finset.mem_univ _ },
{ exact assume i j hi hj eq, pow_injective_of_lt_order_of a hi hj $ by simpa using eq }
end
section classical
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable
open quotient_group
/- TODO: use cardinal theory, introduce `card : set α → ℕ`, or setup decidability for cosets -/
lemma order_of_dvd_card_univ : order_of a ∣ fintype.card α :=
have ft_prod : fintype (quotient (gpowers a) × (gpowers a)),
from fintype.of_equiv α (gpowers.is_subgroup a).group_equiv_quotient_times_subgroup,
have ft_s : fintype (gpowers a),
from @fintype.fintype_prod_right _ _ _ ft_prod _,
have ft_cosets : fintype (quotient (gpowers a)),
from @fintype.fintype_prod_left _ _ _ ft_prod ⟨⟨1, is_submonoid.one_mem (gpowers a)⟩⟩,
have ft : fintype (quotient (gpowers a) × (gpowers a)),
from @prod.fintype _ _ ft_cosets ft_s,
have eq₁ : fintype.card α = @fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @fintype.card _ ft_s,
from calc fintype.card α = @fintype.card _ ft_prod :
@fintype.card_congr _ _ _ ft_prod (gpowers.is_subgroup a).group_equiv_quotient_times_subgroup
... = @fintype.card _ (@prod.fintype _ _ ft_cosets ft_s) :
congr_arg (@fintype.card _) $ subsingleton.elim _ _
... = @fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @fintype.card _ ft_s :
@fintype.card_prod _ _ ft_cosets ft_s,
have eq₂ : order_of a = @fintype.card _ ft_s,
from calc order_of a = _ : order_eq_card_gpowers
... = _ : congr_arg (@fintype.card _) $ subsingleton.elim _ _,
dvd.intro (@fintype.card (quotient (gpowers a)) ft_cosets) $
by rw [eq₁, eq₂, mul_comm]
end classical
end
end order_of
|
1e65dd9bc36b99044bf1b48b3be5fbae818bf596 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/ring_theory/free_ring.lean | 983f8c47dac849a5d207aae781f614175e979083 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,661 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Johan Commelin
-/
import group_theory.free_abelian_group
/-!
# Free rings
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
The theory of the free ring over a type.
## Main definitions
* `free_ring α` : the free (not commutative in general) ring over a type.
* `lift (f : α → R)` : the ring hom `free_ring α →+* R` induced by `f`.
* `map (f : α → β)` : the ring hom `free_ring α →+* free_ring β` induced by `f`.
## Implementation details
`free_ring α` is implemented as the free abelian group over the free monoid on `α`.
## Tags
free ring
-/
universes u v
/-- The free ring over a type `α`. -/
@[derive [ring, inhabited]]
def free_ring (α : Type u) : Type u :=
free_abelian_group $ free_monoid α
namespace free_ring
variables {α : Type u}
/-- The canonical map from α to `free_ring α`. -/
def of (x : α) : free_ring α :=
free_abelian_group.of (free_monoid.of x)
lemma of_injective : function.injective (of : α → free_ring α) :=
free_abelian_group.of_injective.comp free_monoid.of_injective
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected lemma induction_on
{C : free_ring α → Prop} (z : free_ring α)
(hn1 : C (-1)) (hb : ∀ b, C (of b))
(ha : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y))
(hm : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) : C z :=
have hn : ∀ x, C x → C (-x), from λ x ih, neg_one_mul x ▸ hm _ _ hn1 ih,
have h1 : C 1, from neg_neg (1 : free_ring α) ▸ hn _ hn1,
free_abelian_group.induction_on z
(add_left_neg (1 : free_ring α) ▸ ha _ _ hn1 h1)
(λ m, list.rec_on m h1 $ λ a m ih, hm _ _ (hb a) ih)
(λ m ih, hn _ ih)
ha
section lift
variables {R : Type v} [ring R] (f : α → R)
/-- The ring homomorphism `free_ring α →+* R` induced from a map `α → R`. -/
def lift : (α → R) ≃ (free_ring α →+* R) :=
free_monoid.lift.trans free_abelian_group.lift_monoid
@[simp] lemma lift_of (x : α) : lift f (of x) = f x :=
congr_fun (lift.left_inv f) x
@[simp] lemma lift_comp_of (f : free_ring α →+* R) : lift (f ∘ of) = f :=
lift.right_inv f
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext ⦃f g : free_ring α →+* R⦄ (h : ∀ x, f (of x) = g (of x)) :
f = g :=
lift.symm.injective (funext h)
end lift
variables {β : Type v} (f : α → β)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism `free_ring α →+* free_ring β` generated by a map `α → β`. -/
def map : free_ring α →+* free_ring β :=
lift $ of ∘ f
@[simp]
lemma map_of (x : α) : map f (of x) = of (f x) := lift_of _ _
end free_ring
|
f482fd2039364565901ec49531005c0c6c2a1409 | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/data/polynomial/mirror.lean | a6302debbba36f1f5af2d803c4572274d273f76d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,347 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import data.polynomial.ring_division
/-!
# "Mirror" of a univariate polynomial
In this file we define `polynomial.mirror`, a variant of `polynomial.reverse`. The difference
between `reverse` and `mirror` is that `reverse` will decrease the degree if the polynomial is
divisible by `X`. We also define `polynomial.norm2`, which is the sum of the squares of the
coefficients of a polynomial. It is also a coefficient of `p * p.mirror`.
## Main definitions
- `polynomial.mirror`
- `polynomial.norm2`
## Main results
- `polynomial.mirror_mul_of_domain`: `mirror` preserves multiplication.
- `polynomial.irreducible_of_mirror`: an irreducibility criterion involving `mirror`
- `polynomial.norm2_eq_mul_reverse_coeff`: `norm2` is a coefficient of `p * p.mirror`
-/
namespace polynomial
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] (p : polynomial R)
section mirror
/-- mirror of a polynomial: reverses the coefficients while preserving `polynomial.nat_degree` -/
noncomputable def mirror := p.reverse * X ^ p.nat_trailing_degree
@[simp] lemma mirror_zero : (0 : polynomial R).mirror = 0 := by simp [mirror]
lemma mirror_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : R) : (monomial n a).mirror = (monomial n a) :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = 0,
{ rw [ha, monomial_zero_right, mirror_zero] },
{ rw [mirror, reverse, nat_degree_monomial n a ha, nat_trailing_degree_monomial ha,
←C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, rev_at_le (le_refl n),
nat.sub_self, pow_zero, mul_one] },
end
lemma mirror_C (a : R) : (C a).mirror = C a :=
mirror_monomial 0 a
lemma mirror_X : X.mirror = (X : polynomial R) :=
mirror_monomial 1 (1 : R)
lemma mirror_nat_degree : p.mirror.nat_degree = p.nat_degree :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw [hp, mirror_zero] },
by_cases hR : nontrivial R,
{ haveI := hR,
rw [mirror, nat_degree_mul', reverse_nat_degree, nat_degree_X_pow,
nat.sub_add_cancel p.nat_trailing_degree_le_nat_degree],
rwa [leading_coeff_X_pow, mul_one, reverse_leading_coeff, ne, trailing_coeff_eq_zero] },
{ haveI := not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp hR,
exact congr_arg nat_degree (subsingleton.elim p.mirror p) },
end
lemma mirror_nat_trailing_degree : p.mirror.nat_trailing_degree = p.nat_trailing_degree :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw [hp, mirror_zero] },
{ rw [mirror, nat_trailing_degree_mul_X_pow ((mt reverse_eq_zero.mp) hp),
reverse_nat_trailing_degree, zero_add] },
end
lemma coeff_mirror (n : ℕ) :
p.mirror.coeff n = p.coeff (rev_at (p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree) n) :=
begin
by_cases h2 : p.nat_degree < n,
{ rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt (by rwa mirror_nat_degree)],
by_cases h1 : n ≤ p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree,
{ rw [rev_at_le h1, coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_nat_trailing_degree],
exact (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add h1).mpr (nat.add_lt_add_right h2 _) },
{ rw [←rev_at_fun_eq, rev_at_fun, if_neg h1, coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt h2] } },
rw not_lt at h2,
rw [rev_at_le (h2.trans (nat.le_add_right _ _))],
by_cases h3 : p.nat_trailing_degree ≤ n,
{ rw [←nat.sub_add_eq_add_sub h2, ←nat.sub_sub_assoc h2 h3, mirror, coeff_mul_X_pow',
if_pos h3, coeff_reverse, rev_at_le ((nat.sub_le_self _ _).trans h2)] },
rw not_le at h3,
rw coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt (nat.lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt.mpr (nat.add_lt_add_left h3 _)),
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_nat_trailing_degree (by rwa mirror_nat_trailing_degree),
end
--TODO: Extract `finset.sum_range_rev_at` lemma.
lemma mirror_eval_one : p.mirror.eval 1 = p.eval 1 :=
begin
simp_rw [eval_eq_finset_sum, one_pow, mul_one, mirror_nat_degree],
refine finset.sum_bij_ne_zero _ _ _ _ _,
{ exact λ n hn hp, rev_at (p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree) n },
{ intros n hn hp,
rw finset.mem_range_succ_iff at *,
rw rev_at_le (hn.trans (nat.le_add_right _ _)),
rw [nat.sub_le_iff, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel, ←mirror_nat_trailing_degree],
exact nat_trailing_degree_le_of_ne_zero hp },
{ exact λ n₁ n₂ hn₁ hp₁ hn₂ hp₂ h, by rw [←@rev_at_invol _ n₁, h, rev_at_invol] },
{ intros n hn hp,
use rev_at (p.nat_degree + p.nat_trailing_degree) n,
refine ⟨_, _, rev_at_invol.symm⟩,
{ rw finset.mem_range_succ_iff at *,
rw rev_at_le (hn.trans (nat.le_add_right _ _)),
rw [nat.sub_le_iff, add_comm, nat.add_sub_cancel],
exact nat_trailing_degree_le_of_ne_zero hp },
{ change p.mirror.coeff _ ≠ 0,
rwa [coeff_mirror, rev_at_invol] } },
{ exact λ n hn hp, p.coeff_mirror n },
end
lemma mirror_mirror : p.mirror.mirror = p :=
polynomial.ext (λ n, by rw [coeff_mirror, coeff_mirror,
mirror_nat_degree, mirror_nat_trailing_degree, rev_at_invol])
lemma mirror_eq_zero : p.mirror = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨λ h, by rw [←p.mirror_mirror, h, mirror_zero], λ h, by rw [h, mirror_zero]⟩
lemma mirror_trailing_coeff : p.mirror.trailing_coeff = p.leading_coeff :=
by rw [leading_coeff, trailing_coeff, mirror_nat_trailing_degree, coeff_mirror,
rev_at_le (nat.le_add_left _ _), nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma mirror_leading_coeff : p.mirror.leading_coeff = p.trailing_coeff :=
by rw [←p.mirror_mirror, mirror_trailing_coeff, p.mirror_mirror]
lemma mirror_mul_of_domain {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] (p q : polynomial R) :
(p * q).mirror = p.mirror * q.mirror :=
begin
by_cases hp : p = 0,
{ rw [hp, zero_mul, mirror_zero, zero_mul] },
by_cases hq : q = 0,
{ rw [hq, mul_zero, mirror_zero, mul_zero] },
rw [mirror, mirror, mirror, reverse_mul_of_domain, nat_trailing_degree_mul hp hq, pow_add],
ring,
end
lemma mirror_smul {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] (p : polynomial R) (a : R) :
(a • p).mirror = a • p.mirror :=
by rw [←C_mul', ←C_mul', mirror_mul_of_domain, mirror_C]
lemma mirror_neg {R : Type*} [ring R] (p : polynomial R) : (-p).mirror = -(p.mirror) :=
by rw [mirror, mirror, reverse_neg, nat_trailing_degree_neg, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
lemma irreducible_of_mirror {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] {f : polynomial R}
(h1 : ¬ is_unit f)
(h2 : ∀ k, f * f.mirror = k * k.mirror → k = f ∨ k = -f ∨ k = f.mirror ∨ k = -f.mirror)
(h3 : ∀ g, g ∣ f → g ∣ f.mirror → is_unit g) : irreducible f :=
begin
split,
{ exact h1 },
{ intros g h fgh,
let k := g * h.mirror,
have key : f * f.mirror = k * k.mirror,
{ rw [fgh, mirror_mul_of_domain, mirror_mul_of_domain, mirror_mirror,
mul_assoc, mul_comm h, mul_comm g.mirror, mul_assoc, ←mul_assoc] },
have g_dvd_f : g ∣ f,
{ rw fgh,
exact dvd_mul_right g h },
have h_dvd_f : h ∣ f,
{ rw fgh,
exact dvd_mul_left h g },
have g_dvd_k : g ∣ k,
{ exact dvd_mul_right g h.mirror },
have h_dvd_k_rev : h ∣ k.mirror,
{ rw [mirror_mul_of_domain, mirror_mirror],
exact dvd_mul_left h g.mirror },
have hk := h2 k key,
rcases hk with hk | hk | hk | hk,
{ exact or.inr (h3 h h_dvd_f (by rwa ← hk)) },
{ exact or.inr (h3 h h_dvd_f (by rwa [eq_neg_iff_eq_neg.mp hk, mirror_neg, dvd_neg])) },
{ exact or.inl (h3 g g_dvd_f (by rwa ← hk)) },
{ exact or.inl (h3 g g_dvd_f (by rwa [eq_neg_iff_eq_neg.mp hk, dvd_neg])) } },
end
end mirror
end polynomial
|
92a6d85fe582dcbf9b311d5b2eb00454dccf2599 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/ring_theory/principal_ideal_domain.lean | b28da465ffd5d99b47e03c1cab4c87a5d6906934 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,964 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Morenikeji Neri
-/
import ring_theory.noetherian
import ring_theory.unique_factorization_domain
/-!
# Principal ideal rings and principal ideal domains
A principal ideal ring (PIR) is a ring in which all left ideals are principal. A
principal ideal domain (PID) is an integral domain which is a principal ideal ring.
# Main definitions
Note that for principal ideal domains, one should use
`[integral_domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R]`. There is no explicit definition of a PID.
Theorems about PID's are in the `principal_ideal_ring` namespace.
- `is_principal_ideal_ring`: a predicate on rings, saying that every left ideal is principal.
- `generator`: a generator of a principal ideal (or more generally submodule)
- `to_unique_factorization_monoid`: a PID is a unique factorization domain
# Main results
- `to_maximal_ideal`: a non-zero prime ideal in a PID is maximal.
- `euclidean_domain.to_principal_ideal_domain` : a Euclidean domain is a PID.
-/
universes u v
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
open set function
open submodule
open_locale classical
section
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
/-- An `R`-submodule of `M` is principal if it is generated by one element. -/
class submodule.is_principal (S : submodule R M) : Prop :=
(principal [] : ∃ a, S = span R {a})
instance bot_is_principal : (⊥ : submodule R M).is_principal :=
⟨⟨0, by simp⟩⟩
instance top_is_principal : (⊤ : submodule R R).is_principal :=
⟨⟨1, ideal.span_singleton_one.symm⟩⟩
variables (R)
/-- A ring is a principal ideal ring if all (left) ideals are principal. -/
class is_principal_ideal_ring (R : Type u) [ring R] : Prop :=
(principal : ∀ (S : ideal R), S.is_principal)
attribute [instance] is_principal_ideal_ring.principal
@[priority 100]
instance division_ring.is_principal_idea_ring (K : Type u) [division_ring K] :
is_principal_ideal_ring K :=
{ principal := λ S, by rcases ideal.eq_bot_or_top S with (rfl|rfl); apply_instance }
end
namespace submodule.is_principal
variables [add_comm_group M]
section ring
variables [ring R] [module R M]
/-- `generator I`, if `I` is a principal submodule, is an `x ∈ M` such that `span R {x} = I` -/
noncomputable def generator (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] : M :=
classical.some (principal S)
lemma span_singleton_generator (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] : span R {generator S} = S :=
eq.symm (classical.some_spec (principal S))
@[simp] lemma generator_mem (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] : generator S ∈ S :=
by { conv_rhs { rw ← span_singleton_generator S }, exact subset_span (mem_singleton _) }
lemma mem_iff_eq_smul_generator (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] {x : M} :
x ∈ S ↔ ∃ s : R, x = s • generator S :=
by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ x, ← mem_span_singleton, span_singleton_generator]
lemma eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero (S : submodule R M) [S.is_principal] :
S = ⊥ ↔ generator S = 0 :=
by rw [← @span_singleton_eq_bot R M, span_singleton_generator]
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [module R M]
lemma mem_iff_generator_dvd (S : ideal R) [S.is_principal] {x : R} : x ∈ S ↔ generator S ∣ x :=
(mem_iff_eq_smul_generator S).trans (exists_congr (λ a, by simp only [mul_comm, smul_eq_mul]))
lemma prime_generator_of_is_prime (S : ideal R) [submodule.is_principal S] [is_prime : S.is_prime]
(ne_bot : S ≠ ⊥) :
prime (generator S) :=
⟨λ h, ne_bot ((eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero S).2 h),
λ h, is_prime.ne_top (S.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem (generator_mem S) h),
by simpa only [← mem_iff_generator_dvd S] using is_prime.2⟩
end comm_ring
end submodule.is_principal
namespace is_prime
open submodule.is_principal ideal
-- TODO -- for a non-ID one could perhaps prove that if p < q are prime then q maximal;
-- 0 isn't prime in a non-ID PIR but the Krull dimension is still <= 1.
-- The below result follows from this, but we could also use the below result to
-- prove this (quotient out by p).
lemma to_maximal_ideal [integral_domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R] {S : ideal R}
[hpi : is_prime S] (hS : S ≠ ⊥) : is_maximal S :=
is_maximal_iff.2 ⟨(ne_top_iff_one S).1 hpi.1, begin
assume T x hST hxS hxT,
cases (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 (hST $ generator_mem S) with z hz,
cases hpi.mem_or_mem (show generator T * z ∈ S, from hz ▸ generator_mem S),
{ have hTS : T ≤ S, rwa [← span_singleton_generator T, submodule.span_le, singleton_subset_iff],
exact (hxS $ hTS hxT).elim },
cases (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 h with y hy,
have : generator S ≠ 0 := mt (eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero _).2 hS,
rw [← mul_one (generator S), hy, mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' this] at hz,
exact hz.symm ▸ T.mul_mem_right _ (generator_mem T)
end⟩
end is_prime
section
open euclidean_domain
variable [euclidean_domain R]
lemma mod_mem_iff {S : ideal R} {x y : R} (hy : y ∈ S) : x % y ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S :=
⟨λ hxy, div_add_mod x y ▸ S.add_mem (S.mul_mem_right _ hy) hxy,
λ hx, (mod_eq_sub_mul_div x y).symm ▸ S.sub_mem hx (S.mul_mem_right _ hy)⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance euclidean_domain.to_principal_ideal_domain : is_principal_ideal_ring R :=
{ principal := λ S, by exactI
⟨if h : {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0}.nonempty
then
have wf : well_founded (euclidean_domain.r : R → R → Prop) := euclidean_domain.r_well_founded,
have hmin : well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h ∈ S ∧
well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h ≠ 0,
from well_founded.min_mem wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h,
⟨well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h,
submodule.ext $ λ x,
⟨λ hx, div_add_mod x (well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h) ▸
(ideal.mem_span_singleton.2 $ dvd_add (dvd_mul_right _ _) $
have (x % (well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h) ∉ {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0}),
from λ h₁, well_founded.not_lt_min wf _ h h₁ (mod_lt x hmin.2),
have x % well_founded.min wf {x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0} h = 0,
by finish [(mod_mem_iff hmin.1).2 hx],
by simp *),
λ hx, let ⟨y, hy⟩ := ideal.mem_span_singleton.1 hx in hy.symm ▸ S.mul_mem_right _ hmin.1⟩⟩
else ⟨0, submodule.ext $ λ a,
by rw [← @submodule.bot_coe R R _ _ _, span_eq, submodule.mem_bot];
exact ⟨λ haS, by_contradiction $ λ ha0, h ⟨a, ⟨haS, ha0⟩⟩, λ h₁, h₁.symm ▸ S.zero_mem⟩⟩⟩ }
end
namespace principal_ideal_ring
open is_principal_ideal_ring
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_noetherian_ring [ring R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R] :
is_noetherian_ring R :=
is_noetherian_ring_iff.2 ⟨assume s : ideal R,
begin
rcases (is_principal_ideal_ring.principal s).principal with ⟨a, rfl⟩,
rw [← finset.coe_singleton],
exact ⟨{a}, set_like.coe_injective rfl⟩
end⟩
lemma is_maximal_of_irreducible [comm_ring R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R]
{p : R} (hp : irreducible p) :
ideal.is_maximal (span R ({p} : set R)) :=
⟨⟨mt ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.1 hp.1, λ I hI, begin
rcases principal I with ⟨a, rfl⟩,
erw ideal.span_singleton_eq_top,
unfreezingI { rcases ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton.1 (le_of_lt hI) with ⟨b, rfl⟩ },
refine (of_irreducible_mul hp).resolve_right (mt (λ hb, _) (not_le_of_lt hI)),
erw [ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton, is_unit.mul_right_dvd hb]
end⟩⟩
variables [integral_domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R]
lemma irreducible_iff_prime {p : R} : irreducible p ↔ prime p :=
⟨λ hp, (ideal.span_singleton_prime hp.ne_zero).1 $
(is_maximal_of_irreducible hp).is_prime,
irreducible_of_prime⟩
lemma associates_irreducible_iff_prime : ∀{p : associates R}, irreducible p ↔ prime p :=
associates.irreducible_iff_prime_iff.1 (λ _, irreducible_iff_prime)
section
open_locale classical
/-- `factors a` is a multiset of irreducible elements whose product is `a`, up to units -/
noncomputable def factors (a : R) : multiset R :=
if h : a = 0 then ∅ else classical.some (wf_dvd_monoid.exists_factors a h)
lemma factors_spec (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) :
(∀b∈factors a, irreducible b) ∧ associated (factors a).prod a :=
begin
unfold factors, rw [dif_neg h],
exact classical.some_spec (wf_dvd_monoid.exists_factors a h)
end
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_factors {R : Type v} [integral_domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R] {a b : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ∈ factors a) : b ≠ 0 := irreducible.ne_zero ((factors_spec a ha).1 b hb)
lemma mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset (s : submonoid R)
{a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hfac : ∀ b ∈ factors a, b ∈ s) (hunit : ∀ c : units R, (c : R) ∈ s) :
a ∈ s :=
begin
rcases ((factors_spec a ha).2) with ⟨c, hc⟩,
rw [← hc],
exact submonoid.mul_mem _ (submonoid.multiset_prod_mem _ _ hfac) (hunit _),
end
/-- If a `ring_hom` maps all units and all factors of an element `a` into a submonoid `s`, then it
also maps `a` into that submonoid. -/
lemma ring_hom_mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset {R S : Type*}
[integral_domain R] [is_principal_ideal_ring R] [semiring S]
(f : R →+* S) (s : submonoid S) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ b ∈ factors a, f b ∈ s) (hf: ∀ c : units R, f c ∈ s) :
f a ∈ s :=
mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset (s.comap f.to_monoid_hom) ha h hf
/-- A principal ideal domain has unique factorization -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance to_unique_factorization_monoid : unique_factorization_monoid R :=
{ irreducible_iff_prime := λ _, principal_ideal_ring.irreducible_iff_prime
.. (is_noetherian_ring.wf_dvd_monoid : wf_dvd_monoid R) }
end
end principal_ideal_ring
|
c8c1023de19eb77ae71f8ca86b1997731da35ef4 | c8b4b578b2fe61d500fbca7480e506f6603ea698 | /src/number_theory/cyclotomic/cycl_rat.lean | 6ccc0c06e447fe3394c3c3c020d9918a6ae052d0 | [] | no_license | leanprover-community/flt-regular | aa7e564f2679dfd2e86015a5a9674a6e1197f7cc | 67fb3e176584bbc03616c221a7be6fa28c5ccd32 | refs/heads/master | 1,692,188,905,751 | 1,691,766,312,000 | 1,691,766,312,000 | 421,021,216 | 19 | 4 | null | 1,694,532,115,000 | 1,635,166,136,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,409 | lean | import ring_theory.polynomial.eisenstein.is_integral
import number_theory.cyclotomic.galois_action_on_cyclo
import number_theory.cyclotomic.rat
import number_theory.cyclotomic.Unit_lemmas
import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.ideal
import number_theory.cyclotomic.zeta_sub_one_prime
import number_theory.cyclotomic.cyclotomic_units
import algebra.char_p.quotient
universes u
open finite_dimensional polynomial algebra nat finset fintype
variables (p : ℕ+) (L : Type u) [field L] [char_zero L] [is_cyclotomic_extension {p} ℚ L]
section int_facts
noncomputable theory
open_locale number_field big_operators
open ideal is_cyclotomic_extension
-- TODO can we make a relative version of this with another base ring instead of ℤ ?
-- A version of flt_facts_3 indep of the ring
lemma exists_int_sub_pow_prime_dvd {A : Type*} [comm_ring A] [is_cyclotomic_extension {p} ℤ A]
[hp : fact (p : ℕ).prime] (a : A) : ∃ (m : ℤ), (a ^ (p : ℕ) - m) ∈ span ({p} : set A) :=
begin
have : a ∈ algebra.adjoin ℤ _ := @adjoin_roots {p} ℤ A _ _ _ _ a,
apply algebra.adjoin_induction this,
{ intros x hx,
rcases hx with ⟨hx_w, hx_m, hx_p⟩,
simp only [set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx_m,
rw [hx_m] at hx_p,
simp only [hx_p, coe_coe],
use 1,
simp, },
{ intros r,
use r ^ (p : ℕ),
simp, },
{ rintros x y ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨c, hc⟩,
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_add_pow_prime_eq hp.out x y,
rw [hr],
use c + b,
push_cast,
rw [sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm _ (↑↑p * r),
add_assoc, add_assoc],
apply' ideal.add_mem _ _,
{ convert ideal.add_mem _ hb hc using 1,
ring },
{ rw [mem_span_singleton, coe_coe],
exact dvd_mul_right _ _ } },
{ rintros x y ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨c, hc⟩,
rw mul_pow,
use b * c,
have := ideal.mul_mem_left _ (x ^ (p : ℕ)) hc,
rw [mul_sub] at this,
rw [←ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, map_sub] at this ⊢ hb,
convert this using 2,
rw [int.cast_mul, _root_.map_mul, _root_.map_mul],
congr' 1,
exact (sub_eq_zero.mp hb).symm }
end
example {R A : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A] [algebra R A] [is_cyclotomic_extension {p} R A]
[fact (p : ℕ).prime] (a : A) :
∃ (m : R), (a ^ (p : ℕ) - (algebra_map R A m)) ∈ span ({p} : set A) :=
begin
by_cases hpunit : ↑(p : ℕ) ∈ nonunits A,
swap,
{ simp only [mem_nonunits_iff, not_not] at hpunit,
exact ⟨0, by simp [ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.2 hpunit]⟩ },
have : a ∈ algebra.adjoin R _ := @adjoin_roots {p} R A _ _ _ _ a,
refine algebra.adjoin_induction this _ (λ r, ⟨r ^ (p : ℕ), by simp⟩) _ _,
{ rintros x ⟨hx_w, hx_m, hx_p⟩,
simp only [set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx_m,
rw [hx_m] at hx_p,
exact ⟨1, by simp [hx_p, coe_coe]⟩ },
{ rintros x y ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨c, hc⟩,
use c + b,
rw [←ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, map_sub, sub_eq_zero] at ⊢ hb hc,
haveI : char_p (A ⧸ span ({p} : set A)) (p : ℕ) := by convert char_p.quotient A (p : ℕ) hpunit,
rw [map_add, map_pow, map_add, add_pow_char_of_commute, ← map_pow, ← map_pow],
{ simp [hb, hc, add_comm] },
{ exact commute.all _ _ } },
{ rintros x y ⟨b, hb⟩ ⟨c, hc⟩,
rw mul_pow,
use b * c,
rw [←ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, map_sub, sub_eq_zero] at ⊢ hb hc,
simp [hb, hc] }
end
instance aaaa [fact ((p : ℕ).prime)] : is_cyclotomic_extension {p} ℤ (𝓞 L) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec p ℚ L).adjoin_is_cyclotomic_extension ℤ in
by exactI is_cyclotomic_extension.equiv {p} _ _ (zeta_spec p ℚ L).adjoin_equiv_ring_of_integers'
local notation `R` := 𝓞 (cyclotomic_field p ℚ)
-- TODO I (alex) am not sure whether this is better as ideal span,
-- or fractional_ideal.span_singleton
/-- The principal ideal generated by `x + y ζ^i` for integer `x` and `y` -/
@[nolint unused_arguments]
def flt_ideals [fact ((p : ℕ).prime)] (x y : ℤ) {η : R}
(hη : η ∈ nth_roots_finset p R) : ideal R :=
ideal.span ({ x + η * y } : set R)
variable {p} -- why does this not update (n : ℕ+)?
lemma mem_flt_ideals [fact ((p : ℕ).prime)] (x y : ℤ) {η : R}
(hη : η ∈ nth_roots_finset p R) :
↑x + η * ↑y ∈ flt_ideals p x y hη :=
mem_span_singleton.mpr dvd_rfl
lemma ideal.le_add (a b c d : ideal R) (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a + c ≤ b + d :=
begin
simp at *,
split,
apply le_trans hab (@le_sup_left _ _ _ _ ),
apply le_trans hcd (@le_sup_right _ _ _ _ ),
end
lemma not_coprime_not_top (a b : ideal R) : ¬ is_coprime a b ↔ a + b ≠ ⊤ :=
begin
apply not_iff_not_of_iff,
rw is_coprime,
split,
intro h,
obtain ⟨x, y , hxy ⟩ := h,
rw eq_top_iff_one,
have h2 : x * a + y * b ≤ a + b, by {apply ideal.le_add, all_goals {apply mul_le_left}, },
apply h2,
rw hxy,
simp,
intro h,
refine ⟨1,1,_⟩,
simp [h],
end
instance a1 : is_galois ℚ (cyclotomic_field p ℚ) := is_galois p _ _
instance a2 : finite_dimensional ℚ (cyclotomic_field p ℚ) := finite_dimensional {p} _ _
instance a3 : number_field (cyclotomic_field p ℚ) := number_field {p} ℚ _
open is_primitive_root
lemma nth_roots_prim [fact (p : ℕ).prime] {η : R} (hη : η ∈ nth_roots_finset p R)
(hne1 : η ≠ 1) : is_primitive_root η p :=
begin
have hζ' := (zeta_spec p ℚ ((cyclotomic_field p ℚ))).unit'_coe,
rw (nth_roots_one_eq_bUnion_primitive_roots' hζ') at hη,
simp at *,
obtain ⟨a, ha, h2⟩ := hη,
have ha2 : a = p, by {rw (dvd_prime _inst_4.out) at ha,
cases ha,
exfalso,
rw ha at h2,
simp at h2,
rw h2 at hne1,
simp at *,
exact hne1,
exact ha,},
rw ha2 at h2,
have hn : 0 <(p : ℕ), by {norm_num,},
rw (mem_primitive_roots hn) at h2,
exact h2,
end
lemma prim_coe (ζ : R) (hζ : is_primitive_root ζ p) :
is_primitive_root (ζ : (cyclotomic_field p ℚ)) p :=
coe_submonoid_class_iff.mpr hζ
lemma zeta_sub_one_dvb_p [fact (p : ℕ).prime] (ph : 5 ≤ p) {η : R} (hη : η ∈ nth_roots_finset p R)
(hne1 : η ≠ 1): (1 - η) ∣ (p : R) :=
begin
have h00 : (1 - η) ∣ (p : R) ↔ (η - 1) ∣ (p : R), by {have hh : -(η - 1) = (1 - η), by {ring},
simp_rw [←hh],
apply neg_dvd},
rw h00,
have : is_primitive_root (η : (cyclotomic_field p ℚ)) p, by {
apply prim_coe p η (nth_roots_prim hη hne1)},
have h0 : p ≠ 2, by { intro hP,
norm_num [hP] at ph },
have h := ring_of_integers.dvd_norm ℚ ((η - 1) : R),
have h2 := is_primitive_root.sub_one_norm_prime this (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat p.2) h0,
convert h,
ext,
rw ring_of_integers.coe_algebra_map_norm,
norm_cast at h2,
rw h2,
simp,
end
lemma one_sub_zeta_prime [fact (p : ℕ).prime] (ph : 5 ≤ p) {η : R} (hη : η ∈ nth_roots_finset p R)
(hne1 : η ≠ 1) : prime (1 - η) :=
begin
replace ph : p ≠ 2,
{ intro h,
rw [h] at ph,
simpa using ph },
have h := (prim_coe p η (nth_roots_prim hη hne1)),
have := rat.zeta_sub_one_prime' h ph,
have H : ((⟨η - 1, subalgebra.sub_mem _ (h.is_integral p.pos) (subalgebra.one_mem _)⟩ : R)) =
η -1 := rfl,
rw [H] at this,
convert this.neg,
ring,
end
lemma diff_of_roots [hp : fact (p : ℕ).prime] (ph : 5 ≤ p) {η₁ η₂ : R} (hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nth_roots_finset p R)
(hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nth_roots_finset p R) (hdiff : η₁ ≠ η₂) (hwlog : η₁ ≠ 1) :
∃ (u : Rˣ), (η₁ - η₂) = u * (1 - η₁) :=
begin
replace ph : 2 ≤ p := le_trans (by norm_num) ph,
have h := nth_roots_prim hη₁ hwlog,
obtain ⟨i, ⟨H, hi⟩⟩ := h.eq_pow_of_pow_eq_one ((mem_nth_roots_finset hp.out.pos).1 hη₂) hp.out.pos,
have hi1 : 1 ≠ i,
{ intro hi1,
rw [← hi1, pow_one] at hi,
exact hdiff hi },
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := cyclotomic_unit.is_primitive_root.zeta_pow_sub_eq_unit_zeta_sub_one
R ph hp.out hp.out.one_lt H hi1 h,
refine ⟨u, _⟩,
rw [← hu, hi, pow_one],
end
lemma diff_of_roots2 [fact (p : ℕ).prime] (ph : 5 ≤ p) {η₁ η₂ : R} (hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nth_roots_finset p R)
(hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nth_roots_finset p R) (hdiff : η₁ ≠ η₂) (hwlog : η₁ ≠ 1) :
∃ (u : Rˣ), (η₂ - η₁) = u * (1 - η₁) :=
begin
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := diff_of_roots ph hη₁ hη₂ hdiff hwlog,
refine ⟨-u, _⟩,
rw [units.coe_neg, neg_mul, ← hu],
ring
end
instance arg : is_dedekind_domain R := infer_instance
lemma flt_ideals_coprime2 [fact (p : ℕ).prime] (ph : 5 ≤ p) {x y : ℤ} {η₁ η₂ : R}
(hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nth_roots_finset p R) (hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nth_roots_finset p R) (hdiff : η₁ ≠ η₂)
(hp : is_coprime x y) (hp2 : ¬ (p : ℤ) ∣ (x + y : ℤ) ) (hwlog : η₁ ≠ 1) :
is_coprime (flt_ideals p x y hη₁) (flt_ideals p x y hη₂) :=
begin
let I := flt_ideals p x y hη₁ ⊔ flt_ideals p x y hη₂,
by_contra,
have he := (not_coprime_not_top p (flt_ideals p x y hη₁) (flt_ideals p x y hη₂)).1 h,
have := exists_le_maximal I he,
obtain ⟨P, hP1, hP2⟩:= this,
have hiP : (flt_ideals p x y hη₁) ≤ P := le_trans le_sup_left hP2,
have hjP : (flt_ideals p x y hη₂) ≤ P := le_trans le_sup_right hP2,
have hel1: ∃ v : Rˣ, (v : R) * y * (1 - η₁) ∈ I,
{ have : ↑x + η₁ * ↑y + (-1) * (↑x + η₂ * ↑y) ∈ I := ideal.add_mem _
(mem_sup_left (mem_flt_ideals _ _ hη₁))
(mul_mem_left _ (-1) (mem_sup_right (mem_flt_ideals _ _ _))),
simp only [neg_mul, one_mul, neg_add_rev] at this,
rw [neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, add_comm] at this,
simp only [← add_assoc] at this,
simp at this,
have hh := diff_of_roots ph hη₁ hη₂ hdiff hwlog,
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := hh,
refine ⟨v, _⟩,
have h3 : -(η₂ * ↑y) + η₁ * ↑y = (η₁ - η₂) * y, by {ring},
rw h3 at this,
rw hv at this,
have h4 : ↑v * (1 - η₁) * ↑y = v * y * (1-η₁) , by {ring},
rw ←h4,
apply this },
have hel2 : ∃ v : Rˣ, (v : R) * x * (1 - η₁) ∈ I,
{ have : η₂ * (↑x + η₁ * ↑y) + -η₁ * (↑x + η₂ * ↑y) ∈ I := ideal.add_mem _
(mul_mem_left _ _ (mem_sup_left (mem_flt_ideals x y hη₁)))
(mul_mem_left _ _ (mem_sup_right (mem_flt_ideals x y hη₂))),
have h1 : η₂ * (↑x + η₁ * ↑y) + -η₁ * (↑x + η₂ * ↑y) = (η₂ - η₁) * x, by ring,
rw h1 at this,
have hh := diff_of_roots2 ph hη₁ hη₂ hdiff hwlog,
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := hh,
refine ⟨v, _⟩,
rw hv at this,
have h4 : ↑v * (1 - η₁) * ↑x = v * x * (1-η₁) , by {ring},
rw h4 at this,
exact this },
have hel11: (y : R) * (1 - η₁) ∈ P, by {
obtain ⟨v, hv ⟩:= hel1,
rw mul_assoc at hv,
have hvunit : is_unit (v : R), by {exact units.is_unit v, },
apply (unit_mul_mem_iff_mem P hvunit).1 _,
apply hP2,
apply hv,},
have hel22 : (x : R) * (1 - η₁) ∈ P, by {
obtain ⟨v, hv ⟩:= hel2,
rw mul_assoc at hv,
have hvunit : is_unit (v : R), by {exact units.is_unit v, },
apply (unit_mul_mem_iff_mem P hvunit).1 _,
apply hP2,
apply hv },
have hPrime:= hP1.is_prime,
have hprime2 := is_prime.mem_or_mem hPrime hel11,
have hprime3 := is_prime.mem_or_mem hPrime hel22,
have HC : (1 - η₁) ∈ P → false,
begin
intro h,
have eta_sub_one_ne_zero := sub_ne_zero.mpr (ne.symm hwlog),
have hηprime : is_prime (ideal.span ({1 - η₁} : set R)) := by {
rw span_singleton_prime eta_sub_one_ne_zero,
apply one_sub_zeta_prime ph hη₁ hwlog,},
have H5 : is_prime (ideal.span ({(p : ℤ)} : set ℤ)), by {
have h2 : (p : ℤ) ≠ 0, by {simp, },
have h1 : prime (p : ℤ) , by {simp only [coe_coe], rw ←prime_iff_prime_int, exact _inst_4.out,},
rw (span_singleton_prime h2),
apply h1, },
have hηP : (ideal.span ({1 - η₁} : set R)) = P, by {
have hRdim1 : ring.dimension_le_one R, by {exact is_dedekind_domain.dimension_le_one,},
have hle : (ideal.span ({1 - η₁} : set R)) ≤ P, by {rw span_le, simp [h],},
apply ((@ring.dimension_le_one.prime_le_prime_iff_eq _ _ hRdim1 _ _ hηprime hPrime _).1 hle),
simp,
exact sub_ne_zero.mpr (ne.symm hwlog)},
have hcapZ : P.comap (int.cast_ring_hom R) = ideal.span ({(p : ℤ)} : set ℤ), by {
have H1 : ideal.span ({(p : ℤ)} : set ℤ) ≤ P.comap (int.cast_ring_hom R), by {
rw ←hηP,
apply le_comap_of_map_le _,
rw map_span,
simp,
rw span_singleton_le_span_singleton,
apply zeta_sub_one_dvb_p ph hη₁ hwlog},
have H2 : is_prime (P.comap (int.cast_ring_hom R)),
by {apply @is_prime.comap _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hPrime,},
have H3 : ring.dimension_le_one ℤ, by {exact is_dedekind_domain.dimension_le_one, },
have H4 : (ideal.span ({(p : ℤ)} : set ℤ)) ≠ ⊥, by {simp,},
apply ((@ring.dimension_le_one.prime_le_prime_iff_eq _ _ H3 _ _ H5 H2 H4).1 H1).symm,},
have hxyinP : (x + y : R) ∈ P, by {
have H1 : (x : R) + η₁* y ∈ P, by { apply hiP, apply submodule.mem_span_singleton_self},
have H2 : η₁ * y = y - y * (1 - η₁), by {ring},
rw H2 at H1,
have H3 : ↑x + (↑y - ↑y * (1 - η₁)) = (↑x + ↑y) + (-↑y * (1 - η₁)), by {ring},
rw H3 at H1,
have H4 : -↑y * (1 - η₁) ∈ P, by {rw ←hηP, rw ideal.mem_span_singleton',
refine ⟨-(y : R), rfl⟩, },
apply (ideal.add_mem_iff_left P H4).1 H1,},
have hxyinP2 : (x + y ) ∈ ideal.span ({(p : ℤ)} : set ℤ), by {rw ←hcapZ, simp [hxyinP]},
rw mem_span_singleton at hxyinP2,
apply absurd hxyinP2 hp2,
end,
cases hprime2,
cases hprime3,
obtain ⟨a, b, hab ⟩ := hp,
have hone := P.add_mem (ideal.mul_mem_left _ a hprime3) (ideal.mul_mem_left _ b hprime2),
norm_cast at hone,
rw hab at hone,
norm_cast at hone,
rw ←eq_top_iff_one at hone,
have hcontra := is_prime.ne_top hPrime,
rw hone at hcontra,
simp only [ne.def, eq_self_iff_true, not_true] at hcontra,
exact hcontra,
apply HC hprime3,
apply HC hprime2,
end
lemma aux_lem_flt [fact (p : ℕ).prime] {x y z : ℤ}
(H : x ^ (p : ℕ) + y ^ (p : ℕ) = z ^ (p : ℕ))
(caseI : ¬ ↑p ∣ x * y * z) : ¬ (p : ℤ) ∣ (x + y : ℤ) :=
begin
intro habs,
replace habs : ↑(p : ℕ) ∣ (x + y : ℤ) := by simpa using habs,
rw [← zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, int.cast_add] at habs,
replace H := congr_arg (λ x : ℤ, (x : zmod p)) H.symm,
simp only [int.cast_add, int.cast_pow, zmod.pow_card, habs, zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
← coe_coe] at H,
exact caseI (has_dvd.dvd.mul_left H _)
end
lemma flt_ideals_coprime [fact (p : ℕ).prime] (p5 : 5 ≤ p) {x y z : ℤ}
(H : x ^ (p : ℕ) + y ^ (p : ℕ) = z ^ (p : ℕ)) {η₁ η₂ : R} (hxy : is_coprime x y)
(hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nth_roots_finset p R) (hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nth_roots_finset p R) (hdiff : η₁ ≠ η₂)
(caseI : ¬ ↑p ∣ x * y * z) : is_coprime (flt_ideals p x y hη₁) (flt_ideals p x y hη₂) :=
begin
--how does wlog work? I want to have η₁ ≠ 1...
by_cases h : η₁ ≠ 1,
apply flt_ideals_coprime2 p5 hη₁ hη₂ hdiff hxy (aux_lem_flt H caseI) h,
have h2 : η₂ ≠ 1, by {simp at h, rw h at hdiff, exact hdiff.symm},
have := flt_ideals_coprime2 p5 hη₂ hη₁ hdiff.symm hxy (aux_lem_flt H caseI) h2,
apply is_coprime.symm,
exact this,
end
variable {L}
lemma dvd_last_coeff_cycl_integer [hp : fact (p : ℕ).prime] {ζ : 𝓞 L} (hζ : is_primitive_root ζ p)
{f : fin p → ℤ} (hf : ∃ i, f i = 0) {m : ℤ}
(hdiv : ↑m ∣ ∑ j, f j • ζ ^ (j : ℕ)) :
m ∣ f ⟨(p : ℕ).pred, pred_lt hp.out.ne_zero⟩ :=
begin
obtain ⟨i, Hi⟩ := hf,
have hlast : (fin.cast (succ_pred_prime hp.out)) (fin.last (p : ℕ).pred) =
⟨(p : ℕ).pred, pred_lt hp.out.ne_zero⟩ := fin.ext rfl,
have h : ∀ x, (fin.cast (succ_pred_prime hp.out)) (fin.cast_succ x) =
⟨x, lt_trans x.2 (pred_lt hp.out.ne_zero)⟩ := λ x, fin.ext rfl,
let ζ' := (ζ : L),
have hζ' : is_primitive_root ζ' p :=
is_primitive_root.coe_submonoid_class_iff.2 hζ,
have hcoe : ζ = ⟨ζ', hζ'.is_integral p.pos⟩ := by simp,
set b := hζ'.integral_power_basis' with hb,
have hdim : b.dim = (p : ℕ).pred,
{ rw [hζ'.power_basis_int'_dim, totient_prime hp.out, pred_eq_sub_one] },
by_cases H : i = ⟨(p : ℕ).pred, pred_lt hp.out.ne_zero⟩,
{ simp [H.symm, Hi] },
have hi : ↑i < (p : ℕ).pred,
{ by_contra' habs,
simpa [le_antisymm habs (le_pred_of_lt (fin.is_lt i))] using H },
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hdiv,
rw [← equiv.sum_comp (fin.cast (succ_pred_prime hp.out)).to_equiv, fin.sum_univ_cast_succ] at hy,
simp only [hlast, h, rel_iso.coe_fn_to_equiv, fin.coe_mk] at hy,
rw [hζ.pow_sub_one_eq hp.out.one_lt, ← sum_neg_distrib, smul_sum, sum_range, ← sum_add_distrib,
← (fin.cast hdim).to_equiv.sum_comp] at hy,
simp only [rel_iso.coe_fn_to_equiv, fin.coe_cast, mul_neg, ← subtype.coe_inj] at hy,
push_cast at hy,
conv_lhs at hy { congr, skip, funext,
rw [smul_neg, hcoe, ← hζ'.integral_power_basis'_gen, ← hb, ← subsemiring_class.coe_pow,
← show ∀ x, _ = _, from λ x, congr_fun b.coe_basis x, ← sub_eq_add_neg] },
norm_cast at hy,
rw [sum_sub_distrib] at hy,
replace hy := congr_arg (b.basis.coord ((fin.cast hdim.symm) ⟨i, hi⟩)) hy,
rw [← b.basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply, ← b.basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply, linear_map.map_sub,
b.basis.coord_equiv_fun_symm, b.basis.coord_equiv_fun_symm] at hy,
simp only [Hi, fin.coe_cast, smul_eq_mul, mul_boole, sum_ite_eq', mem_univ, fin.coe_mk,
fin.eta, zero_sub, if_true] at hy,
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← zsmul_eq_smul_cast, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hy,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := b.basis.dvd_coord_smul ((fin.cast hdim.symm) ⟨i, hi⟩) y m,
rw [hn] at hy,
simp [hy, dvd_neg]
end
lemma dvd_coeff_cycl_integer [hp : fact (p : ℕ).prime] {ζ : 𝓞 L} (hζ : is_primitive_root ζ p)
{f : fin p → ℤ} (hf : ∃ i, f i = 0) {m : ℤ}
(hdiv : ↑m ∣ ∑ j, f j • ζ ^ (j : ℕ)) : ∀ j, m ∣ f j :=
begin
let ζ' := (ζ : L),
have hζ' : is_primitive_root ζ' p :=
is_primitive_root.coe_submonoid_class_iff.2 hζ,
have hcoe : ζ = ⟨ζ', hζ'.is_integral p.pos⟩ := by simp,
have hlast : (fin.cast (succ_pred_prime hp.out)) (fin.last (p : ℕ).pred) =
⟨(p : ℕ).pred, pred_lt hp.out.ne_zero⟩ := fin.ext rfl,
have h : ∀ x, (fin.cast (succ_pred_prime hp.out)) (fin.cast_succ x) =
⟨x, lt_trans x.2 (pred_lt hp.out.ne_zero)⟩ := λ x, fin.ext rfl,
set b := hζ'.integral_power_basis' with hb,
have hdim : b.dim = (p : ℕ).pred,
{ rw [hζ'.power_basis_int'_dim, totient_prime hp.out, pred_eq_sub_one] },
have last_dvd := dvd_last_coeff_cycl_integer hζ hf hdiv,
intro j,
by_cases H : j = ⟨(p : ℕ).pred, pred_lt hp.out.ne_zero⟩,
{ simpa [H] using last_dvd },
have hj : ↑j < (p : ℕ).pred,
{ by_contra' habs,
simpa [le_antisymm habs (le_pred_of_lt (fin.is_lt j))] using H },
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hdiv,
rw [← equiv.sum_comp (fin.cast (succ_pred_prime hp.out)).to_equiv, fin.sum_univ_cast_succ] at hy,
simp only [hlast, h, rel_iso.coe_fn_to_equiv, fin.coe_mk] at hy,
rw [hζ.pow_sub_one_eq hp.out.one_lt, ← sum_neg_distrib, smul_sum, sum_range, ← sum_add_distrib,
← (fin.cast hdim).to_equiv.sum_comp] at hy,
simp only [rel_iso.coe_fn_to_equiv, fin.coe_cast, mul_neg, ← subtype.coe_inj] at hy,
push_cast at hy,
conv_lhs at hy { congr, skip, funext,
rw [smul_neg, hcoe, ← hζ'.integral_power_basis'_gen, ← hb, ← subsemiring_class.coe_pow,
← show ∀ x, _ = _, from λ x, congr_fun b.coe_basis x, ← sub_eq_add_neg] },
norm_cast at hy,
rw [sum_sub_distrib] at hy,
replace hy := congr_arg (b.basis.coord ((fin.cast hdim.symm) ⟨j, hj⟩)) hy,
rw [← b.basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply, ← b.basis.equiv_fun_symm_apply, linear_map.map_sub,
b.basis.coord_equiv_fun_symm, b.basis.coord_equiv_fun_symm] at hy,
simp only [fin.cast_mk, fin.coe_mk, fin.eta, basis.coord_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hy,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := b.basis.dvd_coord_smul ((fin.cast hdim.symm) ⟨j, hj⟩) y m,
rw [hy, ← smul_eq_mul, ← zsmul_eq_smul_cast, ← b.basis.coord_apply, ← fin.cast_mk, hn],
exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_right _ _) last_dvd
end
end int_facts
|
2ff0acff14caa2069e86f134115ec8b8e51a1107 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/category_theory/types.lean | e1074994e2618519fdc280a0de49a57f52c6dba6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,110 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import category_theory.epi_mono
import category_theory.functor.fully_faithful
import logic.equiv.basic
/-!
# The category `Type`.
In this section we set up the theory so that Lean's types and functions between them
can be viewed as a `large_category` in our framework.
Lean can not transparently view a function as a morphism in this category, and needs a hint in
order to be able to type check. We provide the abbreviation `as_hom f` to guide type checking,
as well as a corresponding notation `↾ f`. (Entered as `\upr `.) The notation is enabled using
`open_locale category_theory.Type`.
We provide various simplification lemmas for functors and natural transformations valued in `Type`.
We define `ulift_functor`, from `Type u` to `Type (max u v)`, and show that it is fully faithful
(but not, of course, essentially surjective).
We prove some basic facts about the category `Type`:
* epimorphisms are surjections and monomorphisms are injections,
* `iso` is both `iso` and `equiv` to `equiv` (at least within a fixed universe),
* every type level `is_lawful_functor` gives a categorical functor `Type ⥤ Type`
(the corresponding fact about monads is in `src/category_theory/monad/types.lean`).
-/
namespace category_theory
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [category_theory universes].
universes v v' w u u'
/- The `@[to_additive]` attribute is just a hint that expressions involving this instance can
still be additivized. -/
@[to_additive category_theory.types]
instance types : large_category (Type u) :=
{ hom := λ a b, (a → b),
id := λ a, id,
comp := λ _ _ _ f g, g ∘ f }
lemma types_hom {α β : Type u} : (α ⟶ β) = (α → β) := rfl
lemma types_id (X : Type u) : 𝟙 X = id := rfl
lemma types_comp {X Y Z : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : f ≫ g = g ∘ f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma types_id_apply (X : Type u) (x : X) : ((𝟙 X) : X → X) x = x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma types_comp_apply {X Y Z : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x : X) : (f ≫ g) x = g (f x) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma hom_inv_id_apply {X Y : Type u} (f : X ≅ Y) (x : X) : f.inv (f.hom x) = x :=
congr_fun f.hom_inv_id x
@[simp]
lemma inv_hom_id_apply {X Y : Type u} (f : X ≅ Y) (y : Y) : f.hom (f.inv y) = y :=
congr_fun f.inv_hom_id y
/-- `as_hom f` helps Lean type check a function as a morphism in the category `Type`. -/
-- Unfortunately without this wrapper we can't use `category_theory` idioms, such as `is_iso f`.
abbreviation as_hom {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) : α ⟶ β := f
-- If you don't mind some notation you can use fewer keystrokes:
localized "notation `↾` f : 200 := category_theory.as_hom f"
in category_theory.Type -- type as \upr in VScode
section -- We verify the expected type checking behaviour of `as_hom`.
variables (α β γ : Type u) (f : α → β) (g : β → γ)
example : α → γ := ↾f ≫ ↾g
example [is_iso ↾f] : mono ↾f := by apply_instance
example [is_iso ↾f] : ↾f ≫ inv ↾f = 𝟙 α := by simp
end
namespace functor
variables {J : Type u} [category.{v} J]
/--
The sections of a functor `J ⥤ Type` are
the choices of a point `u j : F.obj j` for each `j`,
such that `F.map f (u j) = u j` for every morphism `f : j ⟶ j'`.
We later use these to define limits in `Type` and in many concrete categories.
-/
def sections (F : J ⥤ Type w) : set (Π j, F.obj j) :=
{ u | ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), F.map f (u j) = u j'}
end functor
namespace functor_to_types
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] (F G H : C ⥤ Type w) {X Y Z : C}
variables (σ : F ⟶ G) (τ : G ⟶ H)
@[simp] lemma map_comp_apply (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (a : F.obj X) :
(F.map (f ≫ g)) a = (F.map g) ((F.map f) a) :=
by simp [types_comp]
@[simp] lemma map_id_apply (a : F.obj X) : (F.map (𝟙 X)) a = a :=
by simp [types_id]
lemma naturality (f : X ⟶ Y) (x : F.obj X) : σ.app Y ((F.map f) x) = (G.map f) (σ.app X x) :=
congr_fun (σ.naturality f) x
@[simp] lemma comp (x : F.obj X) : (σ ≫ τ).app X x = τ.app X (σ.app X x) := rfl
variables {D : Type u'} [𝒟 : category.{u'} D] (I J : D ⥤ C) (ρ : I ⟶ J) {W : D}
@[simp] lemma hcomp (x : (I ⋙ F).obj W) :
(ρ ◫ σ).app W x = (G.map (ρ.app W)) (σ.app (I.obj W) x) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_inv_map_hom_apply (f : X ≅ Y) (x : F.obj X) : F.map f.inv (F.map f.hom x) = x :=
congr_fun (F.map_iso f).hom_inv_id x
@[simp] lemma map_hom_map_inv_apply (f : X ≅ Y) (y : F.obj Y) : F.map f.hom (F.map f.inv y) = y :=
congr_fun (F.map_iso f).inv_hom_id y
@[simp] lemma hom_inv_id_app_apply (α : F ≅ G) (X) (x) : α.inv.app X (α.hom.app X x) = x :=
congr_fun (α.hom_inv_id_app X) x
@[simp] lemma inv_hom_id_app_apply (α : F ≅ G) (X) (x) : α.hom.app X (α.inv.app X x) = x :=
congr_fun (α.inv_hom_id_app X) x
end functor_to_types
/--
The isomorphism between a `Type` which has been `ulift`ed to the same universe,
and the original type.
-/
def ulift_trivial (V : Type u) : ulift.{u} V ≅ V := by tidy
/--
The functor embedding `Type u` into `Type (max u v)`.
Write this as `ulift_functor.{5 2}` to get `Type 2 ⥤ Type 5`.
-/
def ulift_functor : Type u ⥤ Type (max u v) :=
{ obj := λ X, ulift.{v} X,
map := λ X Y f, λ x : ulift.{v} X, ulift.up (f x.down) }
@[simp] lemma ulift_functor_map {X Y : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) (x : ulift.{v} X) :
ulift_functor.map f x = ulift.up (f x.down) := rfl
instance ulift_functor_full : full.{u} ulift_functor :=
{ preimage := λ X Y f x, (f (ulift.up x)).down }
instance ulift_functor_faithful : faithful ulift_functor :=
{ map_injective' := λ X Y f g p, funext $ λ x,
congr_arg ulift.down ((congr_fun p (ulift.up x)) : ((ulift.up (f x)) = (ulift.up (g x)))) }
/--
The functor embedding `Type u` into `Type u` via `ulift` is isomorphic to the identity functor.
-/
def ulift_functor_trivial : ulift_functor.{u u} ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
nat_iso.of_components ulift_trivial (by tidy)
/-- Any term `x` of a type `X` corresponds to a morphism `punit ⟶ X`. -/
-- TODO We should connect this to a general story about concrete categories
-- whose forgetful functor is representable.
def hom_of_element {X : Type u} (x : X) : punit ⟶ X := λ _, x
lemma hom_of_element_eq_iff {X : Type u} (x y : X) :
hom_of_element x = hom_of_element y ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ H, congr_fun H punit.star, by cc⟩
/--
A morphism in `Type` is a monomorphism if and only if it is injective.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/003C>.
-/
lemma mono_iff_injective {X Y : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) : mono f ↔ function.injective f :=
begin
split,
{ intros H x x' h,
resetI,
rw ←hom_of_element_eq_iff at ⊢ h,
exact (cancel_mono f).mp h },
{ exact λ H, ⟨λ Z, H.comp_left⟩ }
end
lemma injective_of_mono {X Y : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) [hf : mono f] : function.injective f :=
(mono_iff_injective f).1 hf
/--
A morphism in `Type` is an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/003C>.
-/
lemma epi_iff_surjective {X Y : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) : epi f ↔ function.surjective f :=
begin
split,
{ rintros ⟨H⟩,
refine function.surjective_of_right_cancellable_Prop (λ g₁ g₂ hg, _),
rw [← equiv.ulift.symm.injective.comp_left.eq_iff],
apply H,
change ulift.up ∘ (g₁ ∘ f) = ulift.up ∘ (g₂ ∘ f),
rw hg },
{ exact λ H, ⟨λ Z, H.injective_comp_right⟩ }
end
lemma surjective_of_epi {X Y : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) [hf : epi f] : function.surjective f :=
(epi_iff_surjective f).1 hf
section
/-- `of_type_functor m` converts from Lean's `Type`-based `category` to `category_theory`. This
allows us to use these functors in category theory. -/
def of_type_functor (m : Type u → Type v) [_root_.functor m] [is_lawful_functor m] :
Type u ⥤ Type v :=
{ obj := m,
map := λα β, _root_.functor.map,
map_id' := assume α, _root_.functor.map_id,
map_comp' := assume α β γ f g, funext $ assume a, is_lawful_functor.comp_map f g _ }
variables (m : Type u → Type v) [_root_.functor m] [is_lawful_functor m]
@[simp]
lemma of_type_functor_obj : (of_type_functor m).obj = m := rfl
@[simp]
lemma of_type_functor_map {α β} (f : α → β) :
(of_type_functor m).map f = (_root_.functor.map f : m α → m β) := rfl
end
end category_theory
-- Isomorphisms in Type and equivalences.
namespace equiv
universe u
variables {X Y : Type u}
/--
Any equivalence between types in the same universe gives
a categorical isomorphism between those types.
-/
def to_iso (e : X ≃ Y) : X ≅ Y :=
{ hom := e.to_fun,
inv := e.inv_fun,
hom_inv_id' := funext e.left_inv,
inv_hom_id' := funext e.right_inv }
@[simp] lemma to_iso_hom {e : X ≃ Y} : e.to_iso.hom = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_iso_inv {e : X ≃ Y} : e.to_iso.inv = e.symm := rfl
end equiv
universe u
namespace category_theory.iso
open category_theory
variables {X Y : Type u}
/--
Any isomorphism between types gives an equivalence.
-/
def to_equiv (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃ Y :=
{ to_fun := i.hom,
inv_fun := i.inv,
left_inv := λ x, congr_fun i.hom_inv_id x,
right_inv := λ y, congr_fun i.inv_hom_id y }
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_fun (i : X ≅ Y) : (i.to_equiv : X → Y) = i.hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_symm_fun (i : X ≅ Y) : (i.to_equiv.symm : Y → X) = i.inv := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_id (X : Type u) : (iso.refl X).to_equiv = equiv.refl X := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_comp {X Y Z : Type u} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
(f ≪≫ g).to_equiv = f.to_equiv.trans (g.to_equiv) := rfl
end category_theory.iso
namespace category_theory
/-- A morphism in `Type u` is an isomorphism if and only if it is bijective. -/
lemma is_iso_iff_bijective {X Y : Type u} (f : X ⟶ Y) : is_iso f ↔ function.bijective f :=
iff.intro
(λ i, (by exactI as_iso f : X ≅ Y).to_equiv.bijective)
(λ b, is_iso.of_iso (equiv.of_bijective f b).to_iso)
noncomputable instance : split_epi_category (Type u) :=
{ split_epi_of_epi := λ X Y f hf,
{ section_ := function.surj_inv $ (epi_iff_surjective f).1 hf,
id' := funext $ function.right_inverse_surj_inv $ (epi_iff_surjective f).1 hf } }
end category_theory
-- We prove `equiv_iso_iso` and then use that to sneakily construct `equiv_equiv_iso`.
-- (In this order the proofs are handled by `obviously`.)
/-- Equivalences (between types in the same universe) are the same as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms
of types. -/
@[simps] def equiv_iso_iso {X Y : Type u} : (X ≃ Y) ≅ (X ≅ Y) :=
{ hom := λ e, e.to_iso,
inv := λ i, i.to_equiv, }
/-- Equivalences (between types in the same universe) are the same as (equivalent to) isomorphisms
of types. -/
def equiv_equiv_iso {X Y : Type u} : (X ≃ Y) ≃ (X ≅ Y) :=
(equiv_iso_iso).to_equiv
@[simp] lemma equiv_equiv_iso_hom {X Y : Type u} (e : X ≃ Y) :
equiv_equiv_iso e = e.to_iso := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_equiv_iso_inv {X Y : Type u} (e : X ≅ Y) :
equiv_equiv_iso.symm e = e.to_equiv := rfl
|
e5ccb42651150aebb5e495b3ae0f7176cdba276a | a49a42dda6e1ae18983e9264eb962585a900fa99 | /src/one_case.lean | 0339e4b68772e0e838ef0868c168a1925545c995 | [] | no_license | jamesa9283/Lean-AreaOfACircle | a5d22cbc96bc2cf2f76b79221b0ec65628edc333 | c5d5030eeab98bb6552693de55a77a9cf2c21d20 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,179,712,721 | 1,610,133,816,000 | 1,610,133,816,000 | 327,885,903 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 814 | lean | import measure_theory.interval_integral
import analysis.special_functions.pow
open_locale real
example : 4 * ∫ (x : ℝ) in (0:ℝ)..1, real.sqrt(1 - x^2) = π :=
begin
have : deriv (λ x : ℝ, 1/2 * (real.arcsin x + x * real.sqrt(1 - x^2) ) ) = λ x, real.sqrt(1 - x^2),
{ ext,
rw deriv_const_mul,
rw deriv_add,
simp only [one_div, real.deriv_arcsin],
rw deriv_mul,
simp only [one_mul, deriv_id''],
rw deriv_sqrt,
simp only [differentiable_at_const, mul_one, zero_sub, deriv_sub, differentiable_at_id', deriv_pow'', nat.cast_bit0, deriv_id'',
deriv_const', pow_one, differentiable_at.pow, nat.cast_one],
rw neg_div,
rw mul_div_mul_left _ _ (show (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0, by norm_num),
field_simp,
rw add_left_comm,
rw div_add_div_same,
sorry
},
sorry
end |
973d9c2c7930c16d3b5bb28419986fed93b2599c | 4950bf76e5ae40ba9f8491647d0b6f228ddce173 | /src/algebra/module/linear_map.lean | 67929a2485c6e2003052ef242d9c64e398dbddc3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ntzwq/mathlib | ca50b21079b0a7c6781c34b62199a396dd00cee2 | 36eec1a98f22df82eaccd354a758ef8576af2a7f | refs/heads/master | 1,675,193,391,478 | 1,607,822,996,000 | 1,607,822,996,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,077 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Anne Baanen
-/
import algebra.group.hom
import algebra.module.basic
import algebra.group_action_hom
/-!
# Linear maps and linear equivalences
In this file we define
* `linear_map R M M₂`, `M →ₗ[R] M₂` : a linear map between two R-`semimodule`s.
* `is_linear_map R f` : predicate saying that `f : M → M₂` is a linear map.
* `linear_equiv R M ₂`, `M ≃ₗ[R] M₂`: an invertible linear map
## Tags
linear map, linear equiv, linear equivalences, linear isomorphism, linear isomorphic
-/
open function
open_locale big_operators
universes u u' v w x y z
variables {R : Type u} {k : Type u'} {S : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type x} {M₃ : Type y}
{ι : Type z}
/-- A map `f` between semimodules over a semiring is linear if it satisfies the two properties
`f (x + y) = f x + f y` and `f (c • x) = c • f x`. The predicate `is_linear_map R f` asserts this
property. A bundled version is available with `linear_map`, and should be favored over
`is_linear_map` most of the time. -/
structure is_linear_map (R : Type u) {M : Type v} {M₂ : Type w}
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
(f : M → M₂) : Prop :=
(map_add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(map_smul : ∀ (c : R) x, f (c • x) = c • f x)
section
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A map `f` between semimodules over a semiring is linear if it satisfies the two properties
`f (x + y) = f x + f y` and `f (c • x) = c • f x`. Elements of `linear_map R M M₂` (available under
the notation `M →ₗ[R] M₂`) are bundled versions of such maps. An unbundled version is available with
the predicate `is_linear_map`, but it should be avoided most of the time. -/
structure linear_map (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (M₂ : Type w)
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
extends add_hom M M₂, M →[R] M₂
end
/-- The `add_hom` underlying a `linear_map`. -/
add_decl_doc linear_map.to_add_hom
/-- The `mul_action_hom` underlying a `linear_map`. -/
add_decl_doc linear_map.to_mul_action_hom
infixr ` →ₗ `:25 := linear_map _
notation M ` →ₗ[`:25 R:25 `] `:0 M₂:0 := linear_map R M M₂
namespace linear_map
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃]
section
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨_, to_fun⟩
initialize_simps_projections linear_map (to_fun → apply)
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : M → M₂) (h₁ h₂) :
((linear_map.mk f h₁ h₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = f := rfl
/-- Identity map as a `linear_map` -/
def id : M →ₗ[R] M :=
⟨id, λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
lemma id_apply (x : M) :
@id R M _ _ _ x = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma id_coe : ((linear_map.id : M →ₗ[R] M) : M → M) = _root_.id :=
by { ext x, refl }
end
section
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
variables (f g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
@[simp] lemma to_fun_eq_coe : f.to_fun = ⇑f := rfl
theorem is_linear : is_linear_map R f := ⟨f.2, f.3⟩
variables {f g}
theorem coe_injective : injective (λ f : M →ₗ[R] M₂, show M → M₂, from f) :=
by rintro ⟨f, _⟩ ⟨g, _⟩ ⟨h⟩; congr
@[ext] theorem ext (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_injective $ funext H
protected lemma congr_arg : Π {x x' : M}, x = x' → f x = f x'
| _ _ rfl := rfl
/-- If two linear maps are equal, they are equal at each point. -/
protected lemma congr_fun (h : f = g) (x : M) : f x = g x := h ▸ rfl
theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨by { rintro rfl x, refl }, ext⟩
variables (f g)
@[simp] lemma map_add (x y : M) : f (x + y) = f x + f y := f.map_add' x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (c : R) (x : M) : f (c • x) = c • f x := f.map_smul' c x
@[simp, priority 900]
lemma map_smul_of_tower {R S : Type*} [semiring S] [has_scalar R S] [has_scalar R M]
[semimodule S M] [is_scalar_tower R S M] [has_scalar R M₂] [semimodule S M₂]
[is_scalar_tower R S M₂] (f : M →ₗ[S] M₂) (c : R) (x : M) :
f (c • x) = c • f x :=
by simp only [← smul_one_smul S c x, ← smul_one_smul S c (f x), map_smul]
@[simp] lemma map_zero : f 0 = 0 :=
by rw [← zero_smul R, map_smul f 0 0, zero_smul]
instance : is_add_monoid_hom f :=
{ map_add := map_add f,
map_zero := map_zero f }
/-- convert a linear map to an additive map -/
def to_add_monoid_hom : M →+ M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_zero' := f.map_zero,
map_add' := f.map_add }
@[simp] lemma to_add_monoid_hom_coe :
(f.to_add_monoid_hom : M → M₂) = f := rfl
variable (R)
/-- If `M` and `M₂` are both `R`-semimodules and `S`-semimodules and `R`-semimodule structures
are defined by an action of `R` on `S` (formally, we have two scalar towers), then any `S`-linear
map from `M` to `M₂` is `R`-linear.
See also `linear_map.map_smul_of_tower`. -/
def restrict_scalars {S : Type*} [has_scalar R S] [semiring S] [semimodule S M] [semimodule S M₂]
[is_scalar_tower R S M] [is_scalar_tower R S M₂] (f : M →ₗ[S] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_add' := f.map_add,
map_smul' := f.map_smul_of_tower }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma map_sum {ι} {t : finset ι} {g : ι → M} :
f (∑ i in t, g i) = (∑ i in t, f (g i)) :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_sum _ _
theorem to_add_monoid_hom_injective :
function.injective (to_add_monoid_hom : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) → (M →+ M₂)) :=
λ f g h, ext $ add_monoid_hom.congr_fun h
/-- If two `R`-linear maps from `R` are equal on `1`, then they are equal. -/
@[ext] theorem ext_ring {f g : R →ₗ[R] M} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
ext $ λ x, by rw [← mul_one x, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul, g.map_smul, h]
end
section
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
{semimodule_M₃ : semimodule R M₃}
variables (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- Composition of two linear maps is a linear map -/
def comp : M →ₗ[R] M₃ := ⟨f ∘ g, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (x : M) : f.comp g x = f (g x) := rfl
@[norm_cast]
lemma comp_coe : (f : M₂ → M₃) ∘ (g : M → M₂) = f.comp g := rfl
end
/-- If a function `g` is a left and right inverse of a linear map `f`, then `g` is linear itself. -/
def inverse [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₂ → M) (h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) :
M₂ →ₗ[R] M :=
by dsimp [left_inverse, function.right_inverse] at h₁ h₂; exact
⟨g, λ x y, by { rw [← h₁ (g (x + y)), ← h₁ (g x + g y)]; simp [h₂] },
λ a b, by { rw [← h₁ (g (a • b)), ← h₁ (a • g b)]; simp [h₂] }⟩
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂]
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
@[simp] lemma map_neg (x : M) : f (- x) = - f x :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_neg x
@[simp] lemma map_sub (x y : M) : f (x - y) = f x - f y :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_sub x y
instance : is_add_group_hom f :=
{ map_add := map_add f }
end add_comm_group
end linear_map
namespace is_linear_map
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
include R
/-- Convert an `is_linear_map` predicate to a `linear_map` -/
def mk' (f : M → M₂) (H : is_linear_map R f) : M →ₗ M₂ := ⟨f, H.1, H.2⟩
@[simp] theorem mk'_apply {f : M → M₂} (H : is_linear_map R f) (x : M) :
mk' f H x = f x := rfl
lemma is_linear_map_smul {R M : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M]
(c : R) :
is_linear_map R (λ (z : M), c • z) :=
begin
refine is_linear_map.mk (smul_add c) _,
intros _ _,
simp only [smul_smul, mul_comm]
end
lemma is_linear_map_smul' {R M : Type*} [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] (a : M) :
is_linear_map R (λ (c : R), c • a) :=
is_linear_map.mk (λ x y, add_smul x y a) (λ x y, mul_smul x y a)
variables {f : M → M₂} (lin : is_linear_map R f)
include M M₂ lin
lemma map_zero : f (0 : M) = (0 : M₂) := (lin.mk' f).map_zero
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂]
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
include R
lemma is_linear_map_neg :
is_linear_map R (λ (z : M), -z) :=
is_linear_map.mk neg_add (λ x y, (smul_neg x y).symm)
variables {f : M → M₂} (lin : is_linear_map R f)
include M M₂ lin
lemma map_neg (x : M) : f (- x) = - f x := (lin.mk' f).map_neg x
lemma map_sub (x y) : f (x - y) = f x - f y := (lin.mk' f).map_sub x y
end add_comm_group
end is_linear_map
/-- Linear endomorphisms of a module, with associated ring structure
`linear_map.endomorphism_semiring` and algebra structure `module.endomorphism_algebra`. -/
abbreviation module.End (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [semimodule R M] := M →ₗ[R] M
/-- Reinterpret an additive homomorphism as a `ℤ`-linear map. -/
def add_monoid_hom.to_int_linear_map [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
M →ₗ[ℤ] M₂ :=
⟨f, f.map_add, f.map_int_module_smul⟩
/-- Reinterpret an additive homomorphism as a `ℚ`-linear map. -/
def add_monoid_hom.to_rat_linear_map [add_comm_group M] [vector_space ℚ M]
[add_comm_group M₂] [vector_space ℚ M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
M →ₗ[ℚ] M₂ :=
{ map_smul' := f.map_rat_module_smul, ..f }
/-! ### Linear equivalences -/
section
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- A linear equivalence is an invertible linear map. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure linear_equiv (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (M₂ : Type w)
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂]
extends M →ₗ[R] M₂, M ≃+ M₂
end
attribute [nolint doc_blame] linear_equiv.to_linear_map
attribute [nolint doc_blame] linear_equiv.to_add_equiv
infix ` ≃ₗ `:25 := linear_equiv _
notation M ` ≃ₗ[`:50 R `] ` M₂ := linear_equiv R M M₂
namespace linear_equiv
section add_comm_monoid
variables {M₄ : Type*}
variables [semiring R]
variables [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂] [add_comm_monoid M₃] [add_comm_monoid M₄]
section
variables [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃]
include R
instance : has_coe (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨to_linear_map⟩
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨_, λ f, f.to_fun⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_apply {to_fun inv_fun map_add map_smul left_inv right_inv a} :
(⟨to_fun, map_add, map_smul, inv_fun, left_inv, right_inv⟩ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) a = to_fun a :=
rfl
-- This exists for compatibility, previously `≃ₗ[R]` extended `≃` instead of `≃+`.
@[nolint doc_blame]
def to_equiv : (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) → M ≃ M₂ := λ f, f.to_add_equiv.to_equiv
lemma injective_to_equiv : function.injective (to_equiv : (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) → M ≃ M₂) :=
λ ⟨_, _, _, _, _, _⟩ ⟨_, _, _, _, _, _⟩ h, linear_equiv.mk.inj_eq.mpr (equiv.mk.inj h)
@[simp] lemma to_equiv_inj {e₁ e₂ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂} : e₁.to_equiv = e₂.to_equiv ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
injective_to_equiv.eq_iff
lemma injective_to_linear_map : function.injective (coe : (M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) → (M →ₗ[R] M₂)) :=
λ e₁ e₂ H, injective_to_equiv $ equiv.ext $ linear_map.congr_fun H
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma to_linear_map_inj {e₁ e₂ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂} :
(e₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = e₂ ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
injective_to_linear_map.eq_iff
end
section
variables {semimodule_M : semimodule R M} {semimodule_M₂ : semimodule R M₂}
variables (e e' : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_coe : ((e : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (e : M → M₂) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_to_equiv : (e.to_equiv : M → M₂) = (e : M → M₂) := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_fun_apply {m : M} : e.to_fun m = e m := rfl
section
variables {e e'}
@[ext] lemma ext (h : ∀ x, e x = e' x) : e = e' :=
injective_to_equiv (equiv.ext h)
end
section
variables (M R)
/-- The identity map is a linear equivalence. -/
@[refl]
def refl [semimodule R M] : M ≃ₗ[R] M := { .. linear_map.id, .. equiv.refl M }
end
@[simp] lemma refl_apply [semimodule R M] (x : M) : refl R M x = x := rfl
/-- Linear equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ .. e.to_linear_map.inverse e.inv_fun e.left_inv e.right_inv,
.. e.to_equiv.symm }
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.inv_fun [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) : M₂ → M := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections linear_equiv (to_fun → apply, inv_fun → symm_apply)
@[simp] lemma inv_fun_apply {m : M₂} : e.inv_fun m = e.symm m := rfl
variables {semimodule_M₃ : semimodule R M₃} (e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃)
/-- Linear equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans : M ≃ₗ[R] M₃ :=
{ .. e₂.to_linear_map.comp e₁.to_linear_map,
.. e₁.to_equiv.trans e₂.to_equiv }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_add_equiv : ⇑(e.to_add_equiv) = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem trans_apply (c : M) :
(e₁.trans e₂) c = e₂ (e₁ c) := rfl
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (c : M₂) : e (e.symm c) = c := e.6 c
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (b : M) : e.symm (e b) = b := e.5 b
@[simp] lemma symm_trans_apply (c : M₃) : (e₁.trans e₂).symm c = e₁.symm (e₂.symm c) := rfl
@[simp] lemma trans_refl : e.trans (refl R M₂) = e := injective_to_equiv e.to_equiv.trans_refl
@[simp] lemma refl_trans : (refl R M).trans e = e := injective_to_equiv e.to_equiv.refl_trans
lemma symm_apply_eq {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y := e.to_equiv.symm_apply_eq
lemma eq_symm_apply {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x := e.to_equiv.eq_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma trans_symm [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) :
f.trans f.symm = linear_equiv.refl R M :=
by { ext x, simp }
@[simp] lemma symm_trans [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) :
f.symm.trans f = linear_equiv.refl R M₂ :=
by { ext x, simp }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma refl_to_linear_map [semimodule R M] :
(linear_equiv.refl R M : M →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.id :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma comp_coe [semimodule R M] [semimodule R M₂] [semimodule R M₃] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂)
(f' : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃) : (f' : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f.trans f' : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem map_add (a b : M) : e (a + b) = e a + e b := e.map_add' a b
@[simp] theorem map_zero : e 0 = 0 := e.to_linear_map.map_zero
@[simp] theorem map_smul (c : R) (x : M) : e (c • x) = c • e x := e.map_smul' c x
@[simp] lemma map_sum {s : finset ι} (u : ι → M) : e (∑ i in s, u i) = ∑ i in s, e (u i) :=
e.to_linear_map.map_sum
@[simp] theorem map_eq_zero_iff {x : M} : e x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
e.to_add_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff
theorem map_ne_zero_iff {x : M} : e x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
e.to_add_equiv.map_ne_zero_iff
@[simp] theorem symm_symm : e.symm.symm = e := by { cases e, refl }
protected lemma bijective : function.bijective e := e.to_equiv.bijective
protected lemma injective : function.injective e := e.to_equiv.injective
protected lemma surjective : function.surjective e := e.to_equiv.surjective
protected lemma image_eq_preimage (s : set M) : e '' s = e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
e.to_equiv.image_eq_preimage s
end
/-- An involutive linear map is a linear equivalence. -/
def of_involutive [semimodule R M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (hf : involutive f) : M ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ .. f, .. hf.to_equiv f }
@[simp] lemma coe_of_involutive [semimodule R M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (hf : involutive f) :
⇑(of_involutive f hf) = f :=
rfl
end add_comm_monoid
end linear_equiv
|
11c6274096bb48e953fcd942d2d3c95bf9e49fa2 | 206422fb9edabf63def0ed2aa3f489150fb09ccb | /src/linear_algebra/finite_dimensional.lean | b2fa479e4bee358ba7257fd205be086382169391 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hamdysalah1/mathlib | b915f86b2503feeae268de369f1b16932321f097 | 95454452f6b3569bf967d35aab8d852b1ddf8017 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,154,116,545 | 1,611,797,994,000 | 1,611,797,994,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 53,053 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import linear_algebra.dimension
import ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain
import algebra.algebra.subalgebra
/-!
# Finite dimensional vector spaces
Definition and basic properties of finite dimensional vector spaces, of their dimensions, and
of linear maps on such spaces.
## Main definitions
Assume `V` is a vector space over a field `K`. There are (at least) three equivalent definitions of
finite-dimensionality of `V`:
- it admits a finite basis.
- it is finitely generated.
- it is noetherian, i.e., every subspace is finitely generated.
We introduce a typeclass `finite_dimensional K V` capturing this property. For ease of transfer of
proof, it is defined using the third point of view, i.e., as `is_noetherian`. However, we prove
that all these points of view are equivalent, with the following lemmas
(in the namespace `finite_dimensional`):
- `exists_is_basis_finite` states that a finite-dimensional vector space has a finite basis
- `of_fintype_basis` states that the existence of a basis indexed by a finite type implies
finite-dimensionality
- `of_finset_basis` states that the existence of a basis indexed by a `finset` implies
finite-dimensionality
- `of_finite_basis` states that the existence of a basis indexed by a finite set implies
finite-dimensionality
- `iff_fg` states that the space is finite-dimensional if and only if it is finitely generated
Also defined is `findim`, the dimension of a finite dimensional space, returning a `nat`,
as opposed to `dim`, which returns a `cardinal`. When the space has infinite dimension, its
`findim` is by convention set to `0`.
Preservation of finite-dimensionality and formulas for the dimension are given for
- submodules
- quotients (for the dimension of a quotient, see `findim_quotient_add_findim`)
- linear equivs, in `linear_equiv.finite_dimensional` and `linear_equiv.findim_eq`
- image under a linear map (the rank-nullity formula is in `findim_range_add_findim_ker`)
Basic properties of linear maps of a finite-dimensional vector space are given. Notably, the
equivalence of injectivity and surjectivity is proved in `linear_map.injective_iff_surjective`,
and the equivalence between left-inverse and right-inverse in `mul_eq_one_comm` and
`comp_eq_id_comm`.
## Implementation notes
Most results are deduced from the corresponding results for the general dimension (as a cardinal),
in `dimension.lean`. Not all results have been ported yet.
One of the characterizations of finite-dimensionality is in terms of finite generation. This
property is currently defined only for submodules, so we express it through the fact that the
maximal submodule (which, as a set, coincides with the whole space) is finitely generated. This is
not very convenient to use, although there are some helper functions. However, this becomes very
convenient when speaking of submodules which are finite-dimensional, as this notion coincides with
the fact that the submodule is finitely generated (as a submodule of the whole space). This
equivalence is proved in `submodule.fg_iff_finite_dimensional`.
-/
universes u v v' w
open_locale classical
open vector_space cardinal submodule module function
variables {K : Type u} {V : Type v} [field K] [add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V]
{V₂ : Type v'} [add_comm_group V₂] [vector_space K V₂]
/-- `finite_dimensional` vector spaces are defined to be noetherian modules.
Use `finite_dimensional.iff_fg` or `finite_dimensional.of_fintype_basis` to prove finite dimension
from a conventional definition. -/
@[reducible] def finite_dimensional (K V : Type*) [field K]
[add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V] := is_noetherian K V
namespace finite_dimensional
open is_noetherian
/-- A vector space is finite-dimensional if and only if its dimension (as a cardinal) is strictly
less than the first infinite cardinal `omega`. -/
lemma finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega : finite_dimensional K V ↔ dim K V < omega.{v} :=
begin
cases exists_is_basis K V with b hb,
have := is_basis.mk_eq_dim hb,
simp only [lift_id] at this,
rw [← this, lt_omega_iff_fintype, ← @set.set_of_mem_eq _ b, ← subtype.range_coe_subtype],
split,
{ intro, resetI, convert finite_of_linear_independent hb.1, simp },
{ assume hbfinite,
refine @is_noetherian_of_linear_equiv K (⊤ : submodule K V) V _
_ _ _ _ (linear_equiv.of_top _ rfl) (id _),
refine is_noetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian _ ⟨set.finite.to_finset hbfinite, _⟩,
rw [set.finite.coe_to_finset, ← hb.2], refl }
end
/-- The dimension of a finite-dimensional vector space, as a cardinal, is strictly less than the
first infinite cardinal `omega`. -/
lemma dim_lt_omega (K V : Type*) [field K] [add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V] :
∀ [finite_dimensional K V], dim K V < omega.{v} :=
finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega.1
/-- In a finite dimensional space, there exists a finite basis. A basis is in general given as a
function from an arbitrary type to the vector space. Here, we think of a basis as a set (instead of
a function), and use as parametrizing type this set (and as a function the coercion
`coe : s → V`).
-/
variables (K V)
lemma exists_is_basis_finite [finite_dimensional K V] :
∃ s : set V, (is_basis K (coe : s → V)) ∧ s.finite :=
begin
cases exists_is_basis K V with s hs,
exact ⟨s, hs, finite_of_linear_independent hs.1⟩
end
/-- In a finite dimensional space, there exists a finite basis. Provides the basis as a finset.
This is in contrast to `exists_is_basis_finite`, which provides a set and a `set.finite`.
-/
lemma exists_is_basis_finset [finite_dimensional K V] :
∃ b : finset V, is_basis K (coe : (↑b : set V) → V) :=
begin
obtain ⟨s, s_basis, s_finite⟩ := exists_is_basis_finite K V,
refine ⟨s_finite.to_finset, _⟩,
rw set.finite.coe_to_finset,
exact s_basis,
end
/-- A finite dimensional vector space over a finite field is finite -/
noncomputable def fintype_of_fintype [fintype K] [finite_dimensional K V] : fintype V :=
module.fintype_of_fintype (classical.some_spec (finite_dimensional.exists_is_basis_finset K V) : _)
variables {K V}
/-- A vector space is finite-dimensional if and only if it is finitely generated. As the
finitely-generated property is a property of submodules, we formulate this in terms of the
maximal submodule, equal to the whole space as a set by definition.-/
lemma iff_fg :
finite_dimensional K V ↔ (⊤ : submodule K V).fg :=
begin
split,
{ introI h,
rcases exists_is_basis_finite K V with ⟨s, s_basis, s_finite⟩,
exact ⟨s_finite.to_finset, by { convert s_basis.2, simp }⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨s, hs⟩,
rw [finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega, ← dim_top, ← hs],
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dim_span_le _) (lt_omega_iff_finite.2 (set.finite_mem_finset s)) }
end
/-- If a vector space has a finite basis, then it is finite-dimensional. -/
lemma of_fintype_basis {ι : Type w} [fintype ι] {b : ι → V} (h : is_basis K b) :
finite_dimensional K V :=
iff_fg.2 $ ⟨finset.univ.image b, by {convert h.2, simp} ⟩
/-- If a vector space has a basis indexed by elements of a finite set, then it is
finite-dimensional. -/
lemma of_finite_basis {ι} {s : set ι} {b : s → V} (h : is_basis K b) (hs : set.finite s) :
finite_dimensional K V :=
by haveI := hs.fintype; exact of_fintype_basis h
/-- If a vector space has a finite basis, then it is finite-dimensional, finset style. -/
lemma of_finset_basis {ι} {s : finset ι} {b : (↑s : set ι) → V} (h : is_basis K b) :
finite_dimensional K V :=
of_finite_basis h s.finite_to_set
/-- A subspace of a finite-dimensional space is also finite-dimensional. -/
instance finite_dimensional_submodule [finite_dimensional K V] (S : submodule K V) :
finite_dimensional K S :=
finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (dim_submodule_le _) (dim_lt_omega K V))
/-- A quotient of a finite-dimensional space is also finite-dimensional. -/
instance finite_dimensional_quotient [finite_dimensional K V] (S : submodule K V) :
finite_dimensional K (quotient S) :=
finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (dim_quotient_le _) (dim_lt_omega K V))
/-- The dimension of a finite-dimensional vector space as a natural number. Defined by convention to
be `0` if the space is infinite-dimensional. -/
noncomputable def findim (K V : Type*) [field K]
[add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V] : ℕ :=
if h : dim K V < omega.{v} then classical.some (lt_omega.1 h) else 0
/-- In a finite-dimensional space, its dimension (seen as a cardinal) coincides with its `findim`. -/
lemma findim_eq_dim (K : Type u) (V : Type v) [field K]
[add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V] [finite_dimensional K V] :
(findim K V : cardinal.{v}) = dim K V :=
begin
have : findim K V = classical.some (lt_omega.1 (dim_lt_omega K V)) :=
dif_pos (dim_lt_omega K V),
rw this,
exact (classical.some_spec (lt_omega.1 (dim_lt_omega K V))).symm
end
lemma findim_of_infinite_dimensional {K V : Type*} [field K] [add_comm_group V] [vector_space K V]
(h : ¬finite_dimensional K V) : findim K V = 0 :=
dif_neg $ mt finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega.2 h
/-- If a vector space has a finite basis, then its dimension (seen as a cardinal) is equal to the
cardinality of the basis. -/
lemma dim_eq_card_basis {ι : Type w} [fintype ι] {b : ι → V} (h : is_basis K b) :
dim K V = fintype.card ι :=
by rw [←h.mk_range_eq_dim, cardinal.fintype_card,
set.card_range_of_injective h.injective]
/-- If a vector space has a finite basis, then its dimension is equal to the cardinality of the
basis. -/
lemma findim_eq_card_basis {ι : Type w} [fintype ι] {b : ι → V} (h : is_basis K b) :
findim K V = fintype.card ι :=
begin
haveI : finite_dimensional K V := of_fintype_basis h,
have := dim_eq_card_basis h,
rw ← findim_eq_dim at this,
exact_mod_cast this
end
/-- If a vector space is finite-dimensional, then the cardinality of any basis is equal to its
`findim`. -/
lemma findim_eq_card_basis' [finite_dimensional K V] {ι : Type w} {b : ι → V} (h : is_basis K b) :
(findim K V : cardinal.{w}) = cardinal.mk ι :=
begin
rcases exists_is_basis_finite K V with ⟨s, s_basis, s_finite⟩,
letI: fintype s := s_finite.fintype,
have A : cardinal.mk s = fintype.card s := fintype_card _,
have B : findim K V = fintype.card s := findim_eq_card_basis s_basis,
have C : cardinal.lift.{w v} (cardinal.mk ι) = cardinal.lift.{v w} (cardinal.mk s) :=
mk_eq_mk_of_basis h s_basis,
rw [A, ← B, lift_nat_cast] at C,
have : cardinal.lift.{w v} (cardinal.mk ι) = cardinal.lift.{w v} (findim K V),
by { simp, exact C },
exact (lift_inj.mp this).symm
end
/-- If a vector space has a finite basis, then its dimension is equal to the cardinality of the
basis. This lemma uses a `finset` instead of indexed types. -/
lemma findim_eq_card_finset_basis {b : finset V}
(h : is_basis K (subtype.val : (↑b : set V) -> V)) :
findim K V = finset.card b :=
by { rw [findim_eq_card_basis h, fintype.subtype_card], intros x, refl }
lemma equiv_fin {ι : Type*} [finite_dimensional K V] {v : ι → V} (hv : is_basis K v) :
∃ g : fin (findim K V) ≃ ι, is_basis K (v ∘ g) :=
begin
have : (cardinal.mk (fin $ findim K V)).lift = (cardinal.mk ι).lift,
{ simp [cardinal.mk_fin (findim K V), ← findim_eq_card_basis' hv] },
rcases cardinal.lift_mk_eq.mp this with ⟨g⟩,
exact ⟨g, hv.comp _ g.bijective⟩
end
variables (K V)
lemma fin_basis [finite_dimensional K V] : ∃ v : fin (findim K V) → V, is_basis K v :=
let ⟨B, hB, B_fin⟩ := exists_is_basis_finite K V, ⟨g, hg⟩ := finite_dimensional.equiv_fin hB in
⟨coe ∘ g, hg⟩
variables {K V}
lemma cardinal_mk_le_findim_of_linear_independent
[finite_dimensional K V] {ι : Type w} {b : ι → V} (h : linear_independent K b) :
cardinal.mk ι ≤ findim K V :=
begin
rw ← lift_le.{_ (max v w)},
simpa [← findim_eq_dim K V] using
cardinal_lift_le_dim_of_linear_independent.{_ _ _ (max v w)} h
end
lemma fintype_card_le_findim_of_linear_independent
[finite_dimensional K V] {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {b : ι → V} (h : linear_independent K b) :
fintype.card ι ≤ findim K V :=
by simpa [fintype_card] using cardinal_mk_le_findim_of_linear_independent h
lemma finset_card_le_findim_of_linear_independent [finite_dimensional K V] {b : finset V}
(h : linear_independent K (λ x, x : (↑b : set V) → V)) :
b.card ≤ findim K V :=
begin
rw ←fintype.card_coe,
exact fintype_card_le_findim_of_linear_independent h,
end
lemma lt_omega_of_linear_independent {ι : Type w} [finite_dimensional K V]
{v : ι → V} (h : linear_independent K v) :
cardinal.mk ι < cardinal.omega :=
begin
apply cardinal.lift_lt.1,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
apply linear_independent_le_dim h,
rw [←findim_eq_dim, cardinal.lift_omega, cardinal.lift_nat_cast],
apply cardinal.nat_lt_omega,
end
lemma not_linear_independent_of_infinite {ι : Type w} [inf : infinite ι] [finite_dimensional K V]
(v : ι → V) : ¬ linear_independent K v :=
begin
intro h_lin_indep,
have : ¬ omega ≤ mk ι := not_le.mpr (lt_omega_of_linear_independent h_lin_indep),
have : omega ≤ mk ι := infinite_iff.mp inf,
contradiction
end
/-- A finite dimensional space has positive `findim` iff it has a nonzero element. -/
lemma findim_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero [finite_dimensional K V] : 0 < findim K V ↔ ∃ x : V, x ≠ 0 :=
iff.trans (by { rw ← findim_eq_dim, norm_cast }) (@dim_pos_iff_exists_ne_zero K V _ _ _)
/-- A finite dimensional space has positive `findim` iff it is nontrivial. -/
lemma findim_pos_iff [finite_dimensional K V] : 0 < findim K V ↔ nontrivial V :=
iff.trans (by { rw ← findim_eq_dim, norm_cast }) (@dim_pos_iff_nontrivial K V _ _ _)
/-- A nontrivial finite dimensional space has positive `findim`. -/
lemma findim_pos [finite_dimensional K V] [h : nontrivial V] : 0 < findim K V :=
findim_pos_iff.mpr h
section
open_locale big_operators
open finset
/--
If a finset has cardinality larger than the dimension of the space,
then there is a nontrivial linear relation amongst its elements.
-/
lemma exists_nontrivial_relation_of_dim_lt_card
[finite_dimensional K V] {t : finset V} (h : findim K V < t.card) :
∃ f : V → K, ∑ e in t, f e • e = 0 ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, f x ≠ 0 :=
begin
have := mt finset_card_le_findim_of_linear_independent (by { simpa using h }),
rw linear_dependent_iff at this,
obtain ⟨s, g, sum, z, zm, nonzero⟩ := this,
-- Now we have to extend `g` to all of `t`, then to all of `V`.
let f : V → K := λ x, if h : x ∈ t then if (⟨x, h⟩ : (↑t : set V)) ∈ s then g ⟨x, h⟩ else 0 else 0,
-- and finally clean up the mess caused by the extension.
refine ⟨f, _, _⟩,
{ dsimp [f],
rw ← sum,
fapply sum_bij_ne_zero (λ v hvt _, (⟨v, hvt⟩ : {v // v ∈ t})),
{ intros v hvt H, dsimp,
rw [dif_pos hvt] at H,
contrapose! H,
rw [if_neg H, zero_smul], },
{ intros _ _ _ _ _ _, exact subtype.mk.inj, },
{ intros b hbs hb,
use b,
simpa only [hbs, exists_prop, dif_pos, finset.mk_coe, and_true, if_true, finset.coe_mem,
eq_self_iff_true, exists_prop_of_true, ne.def] using hb, },
{ intros a h₁, dsimp, rw [dif_pos h₁],
intro h₂, rw [if_pos], contrapose! h₂,
rw [if_neg h₂, zero_smul], }, },
{ refine ⟨z, z.2, _⟩, dsimp only [f], erw [dif_pos z.2, if_pos]; rwa [subtype.coe_eta] },
end
/--
If a finset has cardinality larger than `findim + 1`,
then there is a nontrivial linear relation amongst its elements,
such that the coefficients of the relation sum to zero.
-/
lemma exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_dim_succ_lt_card
[finite_dimensional K V] {t : finset V} (h : findim K V + 1 < t.card) :
∃ f : V → K, ∑ e in t, f e • e = 0 ∧ ∑ e in t, f e = 0 ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, f x ≠ 0 :=
begin
-- Pick an element x₀ ∈ t,
have card_pos : 0 < t.card := lt_trans (nat.succ_pos _) h,
obtain ⟨x₀, m⟩ := (finset.card_pos.1 card_pos).bex,
-- and apply the previous lemma to the {xᵢ - x₀}
let shift : V ↪ V := ⟨λ x, x - x₀, sub_left_injective⟩,
let t' := (t.erase x₀).map shift,
have h' : findim K V < t'.card,
{ simp only [t', card_map, finset.card_erase_of_mem m],
exact nat.lt_pred_iff.mpr h, },
-- to obtain a function `g`.
obtain ⟨g, gsum, x₁, x₁_mem, nz⟩ := exists_nontrivial_relation_of_dim_lt_card h',
-- Then obtain `f` by translating back by `x₀`,
-- and setting the value of `f` at `x₀` to ensure `∑ e in t, f e = 0`.
let f : V → K := λ z, if z = x₀ then - ∑ z in (t.erase x₀), g (z - x₀) else g (z - x₀),
refine ⟨f, _ ,_ ,_⟩,
-- After this, it's a matter of verifiying the properties,
-- based on the corresponding properties for `g`.
{ show ∑ (e : V) in t, f e • e = 0,
-- We prove this by splitting off the `x₀` term of the sum,
-- which is itself a sum over `t.erase x₀`,
-- combining the two sums, and
-- observing that after reindexing we have exactly
-- ∑ (x : V) in t', g x • x = 0.
simp only [f],
conv_lhs { apply_congr, skip, rw [ite_smul], },
rw [finset.sum_ite],
conv { congr, congr, apply_congr, simp [filter_eq', m], },
conv { congr, congr, skip, apply_congr, simp [filter_ne'], },
rw [sum_singleton, neg_smul, add_comm, ←sub_eq_add_neg, sum_smul, ←sum_sub_distrib],
simp only [←smul_sub],
-- At the end we have to reindex the sum, so we use `change` to
-- express the summand using `shift`.
change (∑ (x : V) in t.erase x₀, (λ e, g e • e) (shift x)) = 0,
rw ←sum_map _ shift,
exact gsum, },
{ show ∑ (e : V) in t, f e = 0,
-- Again we split off the `x₀` term,
-- observing that it exactly cancels the other terms.
rw [← insert_erase m, sum_insert (not_mem_erase x₀ t)],
dsimp [f],
rw [if_pos rfl],
conv_lhs { congr, skip, apply_congr, skip, rw if_neg (show x ≠ x₀, from (mem_erase.mp H).1), },
exact neg_add_self _, },
{ show ∃ (x : V) (H : x ∈ t), f x ≠ 0,
-- We can use x₁ + x₀.
refine ⟨x₁ + x₀, _, _⟩,
{ rw finset.mem_map at x₁_mem,
rcases x₁_mem with ⟨x₁, x₁_mem, rfl⟩,
rw mem_erase at x₁_mem,
simp only [x₁_mem, sub_add_cancel, function.embedding.coe_fn_mk], },
{ dsimp only [f],
rwa [if_neg, add_sub_cancel],
rw [add_left_eq_self], rintro rfl,
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, exists_prop, finset.mem_map, embedding.coe_fn_mk, eq_self_iff_true,
mem_erase, not_true, exists_eq_right, ne.def, false_and] using x₁_mem, } },
end
section
variables {L : Type*} [linear_ordered_field L]
variables {W : Type v} [add_comm_group W] [vector_space L W]
/--
A slight strengthening of `exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_dim_succ_lt_card`
available when working over an ordered field:
we can ensure a positive coefficient, not just a nonzero coefficient.
-/
lemma exists_relation_sum_zero_pos_coefficient_of_dim_succ_lt_card
[finite_dimensional L W] {t : finset W} (h : findim L W + 1 < t.card) :
∃ f : W → L, ∑ e in t, f e • e = 0 ∧ ∑ e in t, f e = 0 ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, 0 < f x :=
begin
obtain ⟨f, sum, total, nonzero⟩ := exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_dim_succ_lt_card h,
exact ⟨f, sum, total, exists_pos_of_sum_zero_of_exists_nonzero f total nonzero⟩,
end
end
end
/-- If a submodule has maximal dimension in a finite dimensional space, then it is equal to the
whole space. -/
lemma eq_top_of_findim_eq [finite_dimensional K V] {S : submodule K V}
(h : findim K S = findim K V) : S = ⊤ :=
begin
cases exists_is_basis K S with bS hbS,
have : linear_independent K (subtype.val : (subtype.val '' bS : set V) → V),
from @linear_independent.image_subtype _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(submodule.subtype S) hbS.1 (by simp),
cases exists_subset_is_basis this with b hb,
letI : fintype b := classical.choice (finite_of_linear_independent hb.2.1),
letI : fintype (subtype.val '' bS) := classical.choice (finite_of_linear_independent this),
letI : fintype bS := classical.choice (finite_of_linear_independent hbS.1),
have : subtype.val '' bS = b, from set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le hb.1
(by rw [set.card_image_of_injective _ subtype.val_injective, ← findim_eq_card_basis hbS,
← findim_eq_card_basis hb.2, h]; apply_instance),
erw [← hb.2.2, subtype.range_coe, ← this, ← subtype_eq_val, span_image],
have := hbS.2,
erw [subtype.range_coe] at this,
rw [this, map_top (submodule.subtype S), range_subtype],
end
variable (K)
/-- A field is one-dimensional as a vector space over itself. -/
@[simp] lemma findim_of_field : findim K K = 1 :=
begin
have := dim_of_field K,
rw [← findim_eq_dim] at this,
exact_mod_cast this
end
/-- The vector space of functions on a fintype has finite dimension. -/
instance finite_dimensional_fintype_fun {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] :
finite_dimensional K (ι → K) :=
by { rw [finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega, dim_fun'], exact nat_lt_omega _ }
/-- The vector space of functions on a fintype ι has findim equal to the cardinality of ι. -/
@[simp] lemma findim_fintype_fun_eq_card {ι : Type v} [fintype ι] :
findim K (ι → K) = fintype.card ι :=
begin
have : vector_space.dim K (ι → K) = fintype.card ι := dim_fun',
rwa [← findim_eq_dim, nat_cast_inj] at this,
end
/-- The vector space of functions on `fin n` has findim equal to `n`. -/
@[simp] lemma findim_fin_fun {n : ℕ} : findim K (fin n → K) = n :=
by simp
/-- The submodule generated by a finite set is finite-dimensional. -/
theorem span_of_finite {A : set V} (hA : set.finite A) : finite_dimensional K (submodule.span K A) :=
is_noetherian_span_of_finite K hA
/-- The submodule generated by a single element is finite-dimensional. -/
instance (x : V) : finite_dimensional K (K ∙ x) := by {apply span_of_finite, simp}
end finite_dimensional
section zero_dim
open vector_space finite_dimensional
lemma finite_dimensional_of_dim_eq_zero (h : vector_space.dim K V = 0) : finite_dimensional K V :=
by rw [finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega, h]; exact cardinal.omega_pos
lemma finite_dimensional_of_dim_eq_one (h : vector_space.dim K V = 1) : finite_dimensional K V :=
by rw [finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega, h]; exact one_lt_omega
lemma findim_eq_zero_of_dim_eq_zero [finite_dimensional K V] (h : vector_space.dim K V = 0) :
findim K V = 0 :=
begin
convert findim_eq_dim K V,
rw h, norm_cast
end
variables (K V)
lemma finite_dimensional_bot : finite_dimensional K (⊥ : submodule K V) :=
finite_dimensional_of_dim_eq_zero $ by simp
@[simp] lemma findim_bot : findim K (⊥ : submodule K V) = 0 :=
begin
haveI := finite_dimensional_bot K V,
convert findim_eq_dim K (⊥ : submodule K V),
rw dim_bot, norm_cast
end
variables {K V}
lemma bot_eq_top_of_dim_eq_zero (h : vector_space.dim K V = 0) : (⊥ : submodule K V) = ⊤ :=
begin
haveI := finite_dimensional_of_dim_eq_zero h,
apply eq_top_of_findim_eq,
rw [findim_bot, findim_eq_zero_of_dim_eq_zero h]
end
@[simp] theorem dim_eq_zero {S : submodule K V} : dim K S = 0 ↔ S = ⊥ :=
⟨λ h, (submodule.eq_bot_iff _).2 $ λ x hx, congr_arg subtype.val $
((submodule.eq_bot_iff _).1 $ eq.symm $ bot_eq_top_of_dim_eq_zero h) ⟨x, hx⟩ submodule.mem_top,
λ h, by rw [h, dim_bot]⟩
@[simp] theorem findim_eq_zero {S : submodule K V} [finite_dimensional K S] : findim K S = 0 ↔ S = ⊥ :=
by rw [← dim_eq_zero, ← findim_eq_dim, ← @nat.cast_zero cardinal, cardinal.nat_cast_inj]
end zero_dim
namespace submodule
open finite_dimensional
/-- A submodule is finitely generated if and only if it is finite-dimensional -/
theorem fg_iff_finite_dimensional (s : submodule K V) :
s.fg ↔ finite_dimensional K s :=
⟨λh, is_noetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian s h,
λh, by { rw ← map_subtype_top s, exact fg_map (iff_fg.1 h) }⟩
/-- A submodule contained in a finite-dimensional submodule is
finite-dimensional. -/
lemma finite_dimensional_of_le {S₁ S₂ : submodule K V} [finite_dimensional K S₂] (h : S₁ ≤ S₂) :
finite_dimensional K S₁ :=
finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (dim_le_of_submodule _ _ h)
(dim_lt_omega K S₂))
/-- The inf of two submodules, the first finite-dimensional, is
finite-dimensional. -/
instance finite_dimensional_inf_left (S₁ S₂ : submodule K V) [finite_dimensional K S₁] :
finite_dimensional K (S₁ ⊓ S₂ : submodule K V) :=
finite_dimensional_of_le inf_le_left
/-- The inf of two submodules, the second finite-dimensional, is
finite-dimensional. -/
instance finite_dimensional_inf_right (S₁ S₂ : submodule K V) [finite_dimensional K S₂] :
finite_dimensional K (S₁ ⊓ S₂ : submodule K V) :=
finite_dimensional_of_le inf_le_right
/-- The sup of two finite-dimensional submodules is
finite-dimensional. -/
instance finite_dimensional_sup (S₁ S₂ : submodule K V) [h₁ : finite_dimensional K S₁]
[h₂ : finite_dimensional K S₂] : finite_dimensional K (S₁ ⊔ S₂ : submodule K V) :=
begin
rw ←submodule.fg_iff_finite_dimensional at *,
exact submodule.fg_sup h₁ h₂
end
/-- In a finite-dimensional vector space, the dimensions of a submodule and of the corresponding
quotient add up to the dimension of the space. -/
theorem findim_quotient_add_findim [finite_dimensional K V] (s : submodule K V) :
findim K s.quotient + findim K s = findim K V :=
begin
have := dim_quotient_add_dim s,
rw [← findim_eq_dim, ← findim_eq_dim, ← findim_eq_dim] at this,
exact_mod_cast this
end
/-- The dimension of a submodule is bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
lemma findim_le [finite_dimensional K V] (s : submodule K V) : findim K s ≤ findim K V :=
by { rw ← s.findim_quotient_add_findim, exact nat.le_add_left _ _ }
/-- The dimension of a strict submodule is strictly bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
lemma findim_lt [finite_dimensional K V] {s : submodule K V} (h : s < ⊤) :
findim K s < findim K V :=
begin
rw [← s.findim_quotient_add_findim, add_comm],
exact nat.lt_add_of_zero_lt_left _ _ (findim_pos_iff.mpr (quotient.nontrivial_of_lt_top _ h))
end
/-- The dimension of a quotient is bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
lemma findim_quotient_le [finite_dimensional K V] (s : submodule K V) :
findim K s.quotient ≤ findim K V :=
by { rw ← s.findim_quotient_add_findim, exact nat.le_add_right _ _ }
/-- The sum of the dimensions of s + t and s ∩ t is the sum of the dimensions of s and t -/
theorem dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq (s t : submodule K V) [finite_dimensional K s]
[finite_dimensional K t] : findim K ↥(s ⊔ t) + findim K ↥(s ⊓ t) = findim K ↥s + findim K ↥t :=
begin
have key : dim K ↥(s ⊔ t) + dim K ↥(s ⊓ t) = dim K s + dim K t := dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq s t,
repeat { rw ←findim_eq_dim at key },
norm_cast at key,
exact key
end
lemma eq_top_of_disjoint [finite_dimensional K V] (s t : submodule K V)
(hdim : findim K s + findim K t = findim K V)
(hdisjoint : disjoint s t) : s ⊔ t = ⊤ :=
begin
have h_findim_inf : findim K ↥(s ⊓ t) = 0,
{ rw [disjoint, le_bot_iff] at hdisjoint,
rw [hdisjoint, findim_bot] },
apply eq_top_of_findim_eq,
rw ←hdim,
convert s.dim_sup_add_dim_inf_eq t,
rw h_findim_inf,
refl,
end
end submodule
namespace linear_equiv
open finite_dimensional
/-- Finite dimensionality is preserved under linear equivalence. -/
protected theorem finite_dimensional (f : V ≃ₗ[K] V₂) [finite_dimensional K V] :
finite_dimensional K V₂ :=
is_noetherian_of_linear_equiv f
/-- The dimension of a finite dimensional space is preserved under linear equivalence. -/
theorem findim_eq (f : V ≃ₗ[K] V₂) [finite_dimensional K V] :
findim K V = findim K V₂ :=
begin
haveI : finite_dimensional K V₂ := f.finite_dimensional,
simpa [← findim_eq_dim] using f.lift_dim_eq
end
end linear_equiv
namespace finite_dimensional
/--
Two finite-dimensional vector spaces are isomorphic if they have the same (finite) dimension.
-/
theorem nonempty_linear_equiv_of_findim_eq [finite_dimensional K V] [finite_dimensional K V₂]
(cond : findim K V = findim K V₂) : nonempty (V ≃ₗ[K] V₂) :=
nonempty_linear_equiv_of_lift_dim_eq $ by simp only [← findim_eq_dim, cond, lift_nat_cast]
/--
Two finite-dimensional vector spaces are isomorphic if and only if they have the same (finite) dimension.
-/
theorem nonempty_linear_equiv_iff_findim_eq [finite_dimensional K V] [finite_dimensional K V₂] :
nonempty (V ≃ₗ[K] V₂) ↔ findim K V = findim K V₂ :=
⟨λ ⟨h⟩, h.findim_eq, λ h, nonempty_linear_equiv_of_findim_eq h⟩
section
variables (V V₂)
/--
Two finite-dimensional vector spaces are isomorphic if they have the same (finite) dimension.
-/
noncomputable def linear_equiv.of_findim_eq [finite_dimensional K V] [finite_dimensional K V₂]
(cond : findim K V = findim K V₂) : V ≃ₗ[K] V₂ :=
classical.choice $ nonempty_linear_equiv_of_findim_eq cond
end
lemma eq_of_le_of_findim_le {S₁ S₂ : submodule K V} [finite_dimensional K S₂] (hle : S₁ ≤ S₂)
(hd : findim K S₂ ≤ findim K S₁) : S₁ = S₂ :=
begin
rw ←linear_equiv.findim_eq (submodule.comap_subtype_equiv_of_le hle) at hd,
exact le_antisymm hle (submodule.comap_subtype_eq_top.1 (eq_top_of_findim_eq
(le_antisymm (comap (submodule.subtype S₂) S₁).findim_le hd))),
end
/-- If a submodule is less than or equal to a finite-dimensional
submodule with the same dimension, they are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_le_of_findim_eq {S₁ S₂ : submodule K V} [finite_dimensional K S₂] (hle : S₁ ≤ S₂)
(hd : findim K S₁ = findim K S₂) : S₁ = S₂ :=
eq_of_le_of_findim_le hle hd.ge
end finite_dimensional
namespace linear_map
open finite_dimensional
/-- On a finite-dimensional space, an injective linear map is surjective. -/
lemma surjective_of_injective [finite_dimensional K V] {f : V →ₗ[K] V}
(hinj : injective f) : surjective f :=
begin
have h := dim_eq_of_injective _ hinj,
rw [← findim_eq_dim, ← findim_eq_dim, nat_cast_inj] at h,
exact range_eq_top.1 (eq_top_of_findim_eq h.symm)
end
/-- On a finite-dimensional space, a linear map is injective if and only if it is surjective. -/
lemma injective_iff_surjective [finite_dimensional K V] {f : V →ₗ[K] V} :
injective f ↔ surjective f :=
⟨surjective_of_injective,
λ hsurj, let ⟨g, hg⟩ := f.exists_right_inverse_of_surjective (range_eq_top.2 hsurj) in
have function.right_inverse g f, from linear_map.ext_iff.1 hg,
(left_inverse_of_surjective_of_right_inverse
(surjective_of_injective this.injective) this).injective⟩
lemma ker_eq_bot_iff_range_eq_top [finite_dimensional K V] {f : V →ₗ[K] V} :
f.ker = ⊥ ↔ f.range = ⊤ :=
by rw [range_eq_top, ker_eq_bot, injective_iff_surjective]
/-- In a finite-dimensional space, if linear maps are inverse to each other on one side then they
are also inverse to each other on the other side. -/
lemma mul_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one [finite_dimensional K V] {f g : V →ₗ[K] V} (hfg : f * g = 1) :
g * f = 1 :=
have ginj : injective g, from has_left_inverse.injective
⟨f, (λ x, show (f * g) x = (1 : V →ₗ[K] V) x, by rw hfg; refl)⟩,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := g.exists_right_inverse_of_surjective
(range_eq_top.2 (injective_iff_surjective.1 ginj)) in
have f * (g * i) = f * 1, from congr_arg _ hi,
by rw [← mul_assoc, hfg, one_mul, mul_one] at this; rwa ← this
/-- In a finite-dimensional space, linear maps are inverse to each other on one side if and only if
they are inverse to each other on the other side. -/
lemma mul_eq_one_comm [finite_dimensional K V] {f g : V →ₗ[K] V} : f * g = 1 ↔ g * f = 1 :=
⟨mul_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one, mul_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one⟩
/-- In a finite-dimensional space, linear maps are inverse to each other on one side if and only if
they are inverse to each other on the other side. -/
lemma comp_eq_id_comm [finite_dimensional K V] {f g : V →ₗ[K] V} : f.comp g = id ↔ g.comp f = id :=
mul_eq_one_comm
/-- The image under an onto linear map of a finite-dimensional space is also finite-dimensional. -/
lemma finite_dimensional_of_surjective [h : finite_dimensional K V]
(f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (hf : f.range = ⊤) : finite_dimensional K V₂ :=
is_noetherian_of_surjective V f hf
/-- The range of a linear map defined on a finite-dimensional space is also finite-dimensional. -/
instance finite_dimensional_range [h : finite_dimensional K V] (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) :
finite_dimensional K f.range :=
f.quot_ker_equiv_range.finite_dimensional
/-- rank-nullity theorem : the dimensions of the kernel and the range of a linear map add up to
the dimension of the source space. -/
theorem findim_range_add_findim_ker [finite_dimensional K V] (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) :
findim K f.range + findim K f.ker = findim K V :=
by { rw [← f.quot_ker_equiv_range.findim_eq], exact submodule.findim_quotient_add_findim _ }
end linear_map
namespace linear_equiv
open finite_dimensional
variables [finite_dimensional K V]
/-- The linear equivalence corresponging to an injective endomorphism. -/
noncomputable def of_injective_endo (f : V →ₗ[K] V) (h_inj : f.ker = ⊥) : V ≃ₗ[K] V :=
(linear_equiv.of_injective f h_inj).trans
(linear_equiv.of_top _ (linear_map.ker_eq_bot_iff_range_eq_top.1 h_inj))
@[simp] lemma coe_of_injective_endo (f : V →ₗ[K] V) (h_inj : f.ker = ⊥) :
⇑(of_injective_endo f h_inj) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_injective_endo_right_inv (f : V →ₗ[K] V) (h_inj : f.ker = ⊥) :
f * (of_injective_endo f h_inj).symm = 1 :=
linear_map.ext $ (of_injective_endo f h_inj).apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma of_injective_endo_left_inv (f : V →ₗ[K] V) (h_inj : f.ker = ⊥) :
((of_injective_endo f h_inj).symm : V →ₗ[K] V) * f = 1 :=
linear_map.ext $ (of_injective_endo f h_inj).symm_apply_apply
end linear_equiv
namespace linear_map
lemma is_unit_iff [finite_dimensional K V] (f : V →ₗ[K] V): is_unit f ↔ f.ker = ⊥ :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩,
exact linear_map.ker_eq_bot_of_inverse u.inv_mul },
{ intro h_inj,
exact ⟨⟨f, (linear_equiv.of_injective_endo f h_inj).symm.to_linear_map,
linear_equiv.of_injective_endo_right_inv f h_inj,
linear_equiv.of_injective_endo_left_inv f h_inj⟩, rfl⟩ }
end
end linear_map
open vector_space finite_dimensional
section top
@[simp]
theorem findim_top : findim K (⊤ : submodule K V) = findim K V :=
by { unfold findim, simp [dim_top] }
end top
namespace linear_map
theorem injective_iff_surjective_of_findim_eq_findim [finite_dimensional K V]
[finite_dimensional K V₂] (H : findim K V = findim K V₂) {f : V →ₗ[K] V₂} :
function.injective f ↔ function.surjective f :=
begin
have := findim_range_add_findim_ker f,
rw [← ker_eq_bot, ← range_eq_top], refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩,
{ rw [h, findim_bot, add_zero, H] at this, exact eq_top_of_findim_eq this },
{ rw [h, findim_top, H] at this, exact findim_eq_zero.1 (add_right_injective _ this) }
end
theorem findim_le_findim_of_injective [finite_dimensional K V] [finite_dimensional K V₂]
{f : V →ₗ[K] V₂} (hf : function.injective f) : findim K V ≤ findim K V₂ :=
calc findim K V
= findim K f.range + findim K f.ker : (findim_range_add_findim_ker f).symm
... = findim K f.range : by rw [ker_eq_bot.2 hf, findim_bot, add_zero]
... ≤ findim K V₂ : submodule.findim_le _
end linear_map
namespace alg_hom
lemma bijective {F : Type*} [field F] {E : Type*} [field E] [algebra F E]
[finite_dimensional F E] (ϕ : E →ₐ[F] E) : function.bijective ϕ :=
have inj : function.injective ϕ.to_linear_map := ϕ.to_ring_hom.injective,
⟨inj, (linear_map.injective_iff_surjective_of_findim_eq_findim rfl).mp inj⟩
end alg_hom
/-- Bijection between algebra equivalences and algebra homomorphisms -/
noncomputable def alg_equiv_equiv_alg_hom (F : Type u) [field F] (E : Type v) [field E]
[algebra F E] [finite_dimensional F E] : (E ≃ₐ[F] E) ≃ (E →ₐ[F] E) :=
{ to_fun := λ ϕ, ϕ.to_alg_hom,
inv_fun := λ ϕ, alg_equiv.of_bijective ϕ ϕ.bijective,
left_inv := λ _, by {ext, refl},
right_inv := λ _, by {ext, refl} }
section
/-- An integral domain that is module-finite as an algebra over a field is a field. -/
noncomputable def field_of_finite_dimensional (F K : Type*) [field F] [integral_domain K]
[algebra F K] [finite_dimensional F K] : field K :=
{ inv := λ x, if H : x = 0 then 0 else classical.some $
(show function.surjective (algebra.lmul_left F x), from
linear_map.injective_iff_surjective.1 $ λ _ _, (mul_right_inj' H).1) 1,
mul_inv_cancel := λ x hx, show x * dite _ _ _ = _, by { rw dif_neg hx,
exact classical.some_spec ((show function.surjective (algebra.lmul_left F x), from
linear_map.injective_iff_surjective.1 $ λ _ _, (mul_right_inj' hx).1) 1) },
inv_zero := dif_pos rfl,
.. ‹integral_domain K› }
end
namespace submodule
lemma findim_mono [finite_dimensional K V] :
monotone (λ (s : submodule K V), findim K s) :=
λ s t hst,
calc findim K s = findim K (comap t.subtype s)
: linear_equiv.findim_eq (comap_subtype_equiv_of_le hst).symm
... ≤ findim K t : submodule.findim_le _
lemma lt_of_le_of_findim_lt_findim {s t : submodule K V}
(le : s ≤ t) (lt : findim K s < findim K t) : s < t :=
lt_of_le_of_ne le (λ h, ne_of_lt lt (by rw h))
lemma lt_top_of_findim_lt_findim {s : submodule K V}
(lt : findim K s < findim K V) : s < ⊤ :=
begin
rw ← @findim_top K V at lt,
exact lt_of_le_of_findim_lt_findim le_top lt
end
lemma findim_lt_findim_of_lt [finite_dimensional K V] {s t : submodule K V} (hst : s < t) :
findim K s < findim K t :=
begin
rw linear_equiv.findim_eq (comap_subtype_equiv_of_le (le_of_lt hst)).symm,
refine findim_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne le_top _),
intro h_eq_top,
rw comap_subtype_eq_top at h_eq_top,
apply not_le_of_lt hst h_eq_top,
end
end submodule
section span
open submodule
lemma findim_span_le_card (s : set V) [fin : fintype s] :
findim K (span K s) ≤ s.to_finset.card :=
begin
haveI := span_of_finite K ⟨fin⟩,
have : dim K (span K s) ≤ (mk s : cardinal) := dim_span_le s,
rw [←findim_eq_dim, cardinal.fintype_card, ←set.to_finset_card] at this,
exact_mod_cast this
end
lemma findim_span_eq_card {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {b : ι → V}
(hb : linear_independent K b) :
findim K (span K (set.range b)) = fintype.card ι :=
begin
haveI : finite_dimensional K (span K (set.range b)) := span_of_finite K (set.finite_range b),
have : dim K (span K (set.range b)) = (mk (set.range b) : cardinal) := dim_span hb,
rwa [←findim_eq_dim, ←lift_inj, mk_range_eq_of_injective hb.injective,
cardinal.fintype_card, lift_nat_cast, lift_nat_cast, nat_cast_inj] at this,
end
lemma findim_span_set_eq_card (s : set V) [fin : fintype s]
(hs : linear_independent K (coe : s → V)) :
findim K (span K s) = s.to_finset.card :=
begin
haveI := span_of_finite K ⟨fin⟩,
have : dim K (span K s) = (mk s : cardinal) := dim_span_set hs,
rw [←findim_eq_dim, cardinal.fintype_card, ←set.to_finset_card] at this,
exact_mod_cast this
end
lemma span_lt_of_subset_of_card_lt_findim {s : set V} [fintype s] {t : submodule K V}
(subset : s ⊆ t) (card_lt : s.to_finset.card < findim K t) : span K s < t :=
lt_of_le_of_findim_lt_findim (span_le.mpr subset) (lt_of_le_of_lt (findim_span_le_card _) card_lt)
lemma span_lt_top_of_card_lt_findim {s : set V} [fintype s]
(card_lt : s.to_finset.card < findim K V) : span K s < ⊤ :=
lt_top_of_findim_lt_findim (lt_of_le_of_lt (findim_span_le_card _) card_lt)
lemma findim_span_singleton {v : V} (hv : v ≠ 0) : findim K (K ∙ v) = 1 :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ exact findim_span_le_card ({v} : set V) },
{ rw [nat.succ_le_iff, findim_pos_iff],
use [⟨v, mem_span_singleton_self v⟩, 0],
simp [hv] }
end
end span
section is_basis
lemma linear_independent_of_span_eq_top_of_card_eq_findim {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {b : ι → V}
(span_eq : span K (set.range b) = ⊤) (card_eq : fintype.card ι = findim K V) :
linear_independent K b :=
linear_independent_iff'.mpr $ λ s g dependent i i_mem_s,
begin
by_contra gx_ne_zero,
-- We'll derive a contradiction by showing `b '' (univ \ {i})` of cardinality `n - 1`
-- spans a vector space of dimension `n`.
refine ne_of_lt (span_lt_top_of_card_lt_findim
(show (b '' (set.univ \ {i})).to_finset.card < findim K V, from _)) _,
{ calc (b '' (set.univ \ {i})).to_finset.card = ((set.univ \ {i}).to_finset.image b).card
: by rw [set.to_finset_card, fintype.card_of_finset]
... ≤ (set.univ \ {i}).to_finset.card : finset.card_image_le
... = (finset.univ.erase i).card : congr_arg finset.card (finset.ext (by simp [and_comm]))
... < finset.univ.card : finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem (finset.mem_univ i)
... = findim K V : card_eq },
-- We already have that `b '' univ` spans the whole space,
-- so we only need to show that the span of `b '' (univ \ {i})` contains each `b j`.
refine trans (le_antisymm (span_mono (set.image_subset_range _ _)) (span_le.mpr _)) span_eq,
rintros _ ⟨j, rfl, rfl⟩,
-- The case that `j ≠ i` is easy because `b j ∈ b '' (univ \ {i})`.
by_cases j_eq : j = i,
swap,
{ refine subset_span ⟨j, (set.mem_diff _).mpr ⟨set.mem_univ _, _⟩, rfl⟩,
exact mt set.mem_singleton_iff.mp j_eq },
-- To show `b i ∈ span (b '' (univ \ {i}))`, we use that it's a weighted sum
-- of the other `b j`s.
rw [j_eq, mem_coe, show b i = -((g i)⁻¹ • (s.erase i).sum (λ j, g j • b j)), from _],
{ refine submodule.neg_mem _ (smul_mem _ _ (sum_mem _ (λ k hk, _))),
obtain ⟨k_ne_i, k_mem⟩ := finset.mem_erase.mp hk,
refine smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨k, _, rfl⟩),
simpa using k_mem },
-- To show `b i` is a weighted sum of the other `b j`s, we'll rewrite this sum
-- to have the form of the assumption `dependent`.
apply eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero,
calc b i + (g i)⁻¹ • (s.erase i).sum (λ j, g j • b j)
= (g i)⁻¹ • (g i • b i + (s.erase i).sum (λ j, g j • b j))
: by rw [smul_add, ←mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel gx_ne_zero, one_smul]
... = (g i)⁻¹ • 0 : congr_arg _ _
... = 0 : smul_zero _,
-- And then it's just a bit of manipulation with finite sums.
rwa [← finset.insert_erase i_mem_s, finset.sum_insert (finset.not_mem_erase _ _)] at dependent
end
/-- A finite family of vectors is linearly independent if and only if
its cardinality equals the dimension of its span. -/
lemma linear_independent_iff_card_eq_findim_span {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {b : ι → V} :
linear_independent K b ↔ fintype.card ι = findim K (span K (set.range b)) :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
exact (findim_span_eq_card h).symm },
{ intro hc,
let f := (submodule.subtype (span K (set.range b))),
let b' : ι → span K (set.range b) :=
λ i, ⟨b i, mem_span.2 (λ p hp, hp (set.mem_range_self _))⟩,
have hs : span K (set.range b') = ⊤,
{ rw eq_top_iff',
intro x,
have h : span K (f '' (set.range b')) = map f (span K (set.range b')) := span_image f,
have hf : f '' (set.range b') = set.range b, { ext x, simp [set.mem_image, set.mem_range] },
rw hf at h,
have hx : (x : V) ∈ span K (set.range b) := x.property,
conv at hx { congr, skip, rw h },
simpa [mem_map] using hx },
have hi : f.ker = ⊥ := ker_subtype _,
convert (linear_independent_of_span_eq_top_of_card_eq_findim hs hc).map' _ hi }
end
lemma is_basis_of_span_eq_top_of_card_eq_findim {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {b : ι → V}
(span_eq : span K (set.range b) = ⊤) (card_eq : fintype.card ι = findim K V) :
is_basis K b :=
⟨linear_independent_of_span_eq_top_of_card_eq_findim span_eq card_eq, span_eq⟩
lemma finset_is_basis_of_span_eq_top_of_card_eq_findim {s : finset V}
(span_eq : span K (↑s : set V) = ⊤) (card_eq : s.card = findim K V) :
is_basis K (coe : (↑s : set V) → V) :=
is_basis_of_span_eq_top_of_card_eq_findim
((@subtype.range_coe_subtype _ (λ x, x ∈ s)).symm ▸ span_eq)
(trans (fintype.card_coe _) card_eq)
lemma set_is_basis_of_span_eq_top_of_card_eq_findim {s : set V} [fintype s]
(span_eq : span K s = ⊤) (card_eq : s.to_finset.card = findim K V) :
is_basis K (λ (x : s), (x : V)) :=
is_basis_of_span_eq_top_of_card_eq_findim
((@subtype.range_coe_subtype _ s).symm ▸ span_eq)
(trans s.to_finset_card.symm card_eq)
lemma span_eq_top_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_findim
{ι : Type*} [hι : nonempty ι] [fintype ι] {b : ι → V}
(lin_ind : linear_independent K b) (card_eq : fintype.card ι = findim K V) :
span K (set.range b) = ⊤ :=
begin
by_cases fin : (finite_dimensional K V),
{ haveI := fin,
by_contra ne_top,
have lt_top : span K (set.range b) < ⊤ := lt_of_le_of_ne le_top ne_top,
exact ne_of_lt (submodule.findim_lt lt_top) (trans (findim_span_eq_card lin_ind) card_eq) },
{ exfalso,
apply ne_of_lt (fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr hι),
symmetry,
calc fintype.card ι = findim K V : card_eq
... = 0 : dif_neg (mt finite_dimensional_iff_dim_lt_omega.mpr fin) }
end
lemma is_basis_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_findim
{ι : Type*} [nonempty ι] [fintype ι] {b : ι → V}
(lin_ind : linear_independent K b) (card_eq : fintype.card ι = findim K V) :
is_basis K b :=
⟨lin_ind, span_eq_top_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_findim lin_ind card_eq⟩
lemma finset_is_basis_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_findim
{s : finset V} (hs : s.nonempty)
(lin_ind : linear_independent K (coe : (↑s : set V) → V)) (card_eq : s.card = findim K V) :
is_basis K (coe : (↑s : set V) → V) :=
@is_basis_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_findim _ _ _ _ _ _
⟨(⟨hs.some, hs.some_spec⟩ : (↑s : set V))⟩ _ _
lin_ind
(trans (fintype.card_coe _) card_eq)
lemma set_is_basis_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_findim
{s : set V} [nonempty s] [fintype s]
(lin_ind : linear_independent K (coe : s → V)) (card_eq : s.to_finset.card = findim K V) :
is_basis K (coe : s → V) :=
is_basis_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_findim lin_ind (trans s.to_finset_card.symm card_eq)
end is_basis
section subalgebra_dim
open vector_space
variables {F E : Type*} [field F] [field E] [algebra F E]
lemma subalgebra.dim_eq_one_of_eq_bot {S : subalgebra F E} (h : S = ⊥) : dim F S = 1 :=
begin
rw [← S.to_submodule_equiv.dim_eq, h,
(linear_equiv.of_eq ↑(⊥ : subalgebra F E) _ algebra.to_submodule_bot).dim_eq, dim_span_set],
exacts [mk_singleton _, linear_independent_singleton one_ne_zero]
end
@[simp]
lemma subalgebra.dim_bot : dim F (⊥ : subalgebra F E) = 1 :=
subalgebra.dim_eq_one_of_eq_bot rfl
lemma subalgebra_top_dim_eq_submodule_top_dim :
dim F (⊤ : subalgebra F E) = dim F (⊤ : submodule F E) :=
by { rw ← algebra.coe_top, refl }
lemma subalgebra_top_findim_eq_submodule_top_findim :
findim F (⊤ : subalgebra F E) = findim F (⊤ : submodule F E) :=
by { rw ← algebra.coe_top, refl }
lemma subalgebra.dim_top : dim F (⊤ : subalgebra F E) = dim F E :=
by { rw subalgebra_top_dim_eq_submodule_top_dim, exact dim_top }
lemma subalgebra.finite_dimensional_bot : finite_dimensional F (⊥ : subalgebra F E) :=
finite_dimensional_of_dim_eq_one subalgebra.dim_bot
@[simp]
lemma subalgebra.findim_bot : findim F (⊥ : subalgebra F E) = 1 :=
begin
haveI : finite_dimensional F (⊥ : subalgebra F E) := subalgebra.finite_dimensional_bot,
have : dim F (⊥ : subalgebra F E) = 1 := subalgebra.dim_bot,
rw ← findim_eq_dim at this,
norm_cast at *,
simp *,
end
lemma subalgebra.findim_eq_one_of_eq_bot {S : subalgebra F E} (h : S = ⊥) : findim F S = 1 :=
by { rw h, exact subalgebra.findim_bot }
lemma subalgebra.eq_bot_of_findim_one {S : subalgebra F E} (h : findim F S = 1) : S = ⊥ :=
begin
rw eq_bot_iff,
let b : set S := {1},
have : fintype b := unique.fintype,
have b_lin_ind : linear_independent F (coe : b → S) := linear_independent_singleton one_ne_zero,
have b_card : fintype.card b = 1 := fintype.card_of_subsingleton _,
obtain ⟨_, b_spans⟩ := set_is_basis_of_linear_independent_of_card_eq_findim
b_lin_ind (by simp only [*, set.to_finset_card]),
intros x hx,
rw [subalgebra.mem_coe, algebra.mem_bot],
have x_in_span_b : (⟨x, hx⟩ : S) ∈ submodule.span F b,
{ rw subtype.range_coe at b_spans,
rw b_spans,
exact submodule.mem_top, },
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp x_in_span_b,
replace ha : a • 1 = x := by injections with ha,
exact ⟨a, by rw [← ha, algebra.smul_def, mul_one]⟩,
end
lemma subalgebra.eq_bot_of_dim_one {S : subalgebra F E} (h : dim F S = 1) : S = ⊥ :=
begin
haveI : finite_dimensional F S := finite_dimensional_of_dim_eq_one h,
rw ← findim_eq_dim at h,
norm_cast at h,
exact subalgebra.eq_bot_of_findim_one h,
end
@[simp]
lemma subalgebra.bot_eq_top_of_dim_eq_one (h : dim F E = 1) : (⊥ : subalgebra F E) = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← dim_top, ← subalgebra_top_dim_eq_submodule_top_dim] at h,
exact eq.symm (subalgebra.eq_bot_of_dim_one h),
end
@[simp]
lemma subalgebra.bot_eq_top_of_findim_eq_one (h : findim F E = 1) : (⊥ : subalgebra F E) = ⊤ :=
begin
rw [← findim_top, ← subalgebra_top_findim_eq_submodule_top_findim] at h,
exact eq.symm (subalgebra.eq_bot_of_findim_one h),
end
@[simp]
theorem subalgebra.dim_eq_one_iff {S : subalgebra F E} : dim F S = 1 ↔ S = ⊥ :=
⟨subalgebra.eq_bot_of_dim_one, subalgebra.dim_eq_one_of_eq_bot⟩
@[simp]
theorem subalgebra.findim_eq_one_iff {S : subalgebra F E} : findim F S = 1 ↔ S = ⊥ :=
⟨subalgebra.eq_bot_of_findim_one, subalgebra.findim_eq_one_of_eq_bot⟩
end subalgebra_dim
namespace module
namespace End
lemma exists_ker_pow_eq_ker_pow_succ [finite_dimensional K V] (f : End K V) :
∃ (k : ℕ), k ≤ findim K V ∧ (f ^ k).ker = (f ^ k.succ).ker :=
begin
classical,
by_contradiction h_contra,
simp_rw [not_exists, not_and] at h_contra,
have h_le_ker_pow : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ (findim K V).succ → n ≤ findim K (f ^ n).ker,
{ intros n hn,
induction n with n ih,
{ exact zero_le (findim _ _) },
{ have h_ker_lt_ker : (f ^ n).ker < (f ^ n.succ).ker,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne _ (h_contra n (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hn)),
rw pow_succ,
apply linear_map.ker_le_ker_comp },
have h_findim_lt_findim : findim K (f ^ n).ker < findim K (f ^ n.succ).ker,
{ apply submodule.findim_lt_findim_of_lt h_ker_lt_ker },
calc
n.succ ≤ (findim K ↥(linear_map.ker (f ^ n))).succ :
nat.succ_le_succ (ih (nat.le_of_succ_le hn))
... ≤ findim K ↥(linear_map.ker (f ^ n.succ)) :
nat.succ_le_of_lt h_findim_lt_findim } },
have h_le_findim_V : ∀ n, findim K (f ^ n).ker ≤ findim K V :=
λ n, submodule.findim_le _,
have h_any_n_lt: ∀ n, n ≤ (findim K V).succ → n ≤ findim K V :=
λ n hn, (h_le_ker_pow n hn).trans (h_le_findim_V n),
show false,
from nat.not_succ_le_self _ (h_any_n_lt (findim K V).succ (findim K V).succ.le_refl),
end
lemma ker_pow_constant {f : End K V} {k : ℕ} (h : (f ^ k).ker = (f ^ k.succ).ker) :
∀ m, (f ^ k).ker = (f ^ (k + m)).ker
| 0 := by simp
| (m + 1) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [add_comm, pow_add],
apply linear_map.ker_le_ker_comp },
{ rw [ker_pow_constant m, add_comm m 1, ←add_assoc, pow_add, pow_add f k m],
change linear_map.ker ((f ^ (k + 1)).comp (f ^ m)) ≤ linear_map.ker ((f ^ k).comp (f ^ m)),
rw [linear_map.ker_comp, linear_map.ker_comp, h, nat.add_one],
exact le_refl _, }
end
lemma ker_pow_eq_ker_pow_findim_of_le [finite_dimensional K V]
{f : End K V} {m : ℕ} (hm : findim K V ≤ m) :
(f ^ m).ker = (f ^ findim K V).ker :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, h_k_le, hk⟩ :
∃ k, k ≤ findim K V ∧ linear_map.ker (f ^ k) = linear_map.ker (f ^ k.succ) :=
exists_ker_pow_eq_ker_pow_succ f,
calc (f ^ m).ker = (f ^ (k + (m - k))).ker :
by rw nat.add_sub_of_le (h_k_le.trans hm)
... = (f ^ k).ker : by rw ker_pow_constant hk _
... = (f ^ (k + (findim K V - k))).ker : ker_pow_constant hk (findim K V - k)
... = (f ^ findim K V).ker : by rw nat.add_sub_of_le h_k_le
end
lemma ker_pow_le_ker_pow_findim [finite_dimensional K V] (f : End K V) (m : ℕ) :
(f ^ m).ker ≤ (f ^ findim K V).ker :=
begin
by_cases h_cases: m < findim K V,
{ rw [←nat.add_sub_of_le (nat.le_of_lt h_cases), add_comm, pow_add],
apply linear_map.ker_le_ker_comp },
{ rw [ker_pow_eq_ker_pow_findim_of_le (le_of_not_lt h_cases)],
exact le_refl _ }
end
end End
end module
|
4d9ffc794da4a132d4f4e0ea8533d513e24ca8b9 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /test/library_search/basic.lean | 4f5e915a2d7d1e04e1637305cb48f47bf4a02e88 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,222 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import tactic.suggest -- No other imports, for fast testing
/- Turn off trace messages so they don't pollute the test build: -/
set_option trace.silence_library_search true
/- For debugging purposes, we can display the list of lemmas: -/
-- set_option trace.suggest true
namespace test.library_search
-- Check that `library_search` fails if there are no goals.
example : true :=
begin
trivial,
success_if_fail { library_search },
end
-- Verify that `library_search` solves goals via `solve_by_elim` when the library isn't
-- even needed.
example (P : Prop) (p : P) : P :=
by library_search
example (P : Prop) (p : P) (np : ¬P) : false :=
by library_search
example (X : Type) (P : Prop) (x : X) (h : Π x : X, x = x → P) : P :=
by library_search
example (α : Prop) : α → α :=
by library_search -- says: `exact id`
example (p : Prop) [decidable p] : (¬¬p) → p :=
by library_search -- says: `exact not_not.mp`
example (a b : Prop) (h : a ∧ b) : a :=
by library_search -- says: `exact h.left`
example (P Q : Prop) [decidable P] [decidable Q]: (¬ Q → ¬ P) → (P → Q) :=
by library_search -- says: `exact not_imp_not.mp`
example (a b : ℕ) : a + b = b + a :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_comm a b`
example (n m k : ℕ) : n * (m - k) = n * m - n * k :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.mul_sub_left_distrib n m k`
example (n m k : ℕ) : n * m - n * k = n * (m - k) :=
by library_search -- says: `exact eq.symm (nat.mul_sub_left_distrib n m k)`
example {α : Type} (x y : α) : x = y ↔ y = x :=
by library_search -- says: `exact eq_comm`
example (a b : ℕ) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_pos ha hb`
section synonym
-- Synonym `>` for `<` in another part of the goal
example (a b : ℕ) (ha : a > 0) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact add_pos ha hb`
example (a b : ℕ) (h : a ∣ b) (w : b > 0) : a ≤ b :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.le_of_dvd w h`
example (a b : ℕ) (h : a ∣ b) (w : b > 0) : b ≥ a :=
by library_search -- says: `exact nat.le_of_dvd w h`
-- A lemma with head symbol `¬` can be used to prove `¬ p` or `⊥`
example (a : ℕ) : ¬ (a < 0) := by library_search -- says `exact not_lt_bot`
example (a : ℕ) (h : a < 0) : false := by library_search -- says `exact not_lt_bot h`
-- An inductive type hides the constructor's arguments enough
-- so that `library_search` doesn't accidentally close the goal.
inductive P : ℕ → Prop
| gt_in_head {n : ℕ} : n < 0 → P n
-- This lemma with `>` as its head symbol should also be found for goals with head symbol `<`.
lemma lemma_with_gt_in_head (a : ℕ) (h : P a) : 0 > a := by { cases h, assumption }
-- This lemma with `false` as its head symbols should also be found for goals with head symbol `¬`.
lemma lemma_with_false_in_head (a b : ℕ) (h1 : a < b) (h2 : P a) : false :=
by { apply nat.not_lt_zero, cases h2, assumption }
example (a : ℕ) (h : P a) : 0 > a := by library_search -- says `exact lemma_with_gt_in_head a h`
example (a : ℕ) (h : P a) : a < 0 := by library_search -- says `exact lemma_with_gt_in_head a h`
example (a b : ℕ) (h1 : a < b) (h2 : P a) : false := by library_search
-- says `exact lemma_with_false_in_head a b h1 h2`
example (a b : ℕ) (h1 : a < b) : ¬ (P a) := by library_search!
-- says `exact lemma_with_false_in_head a b h1`
end synonym
-- We even find `iff` results:
example : ∀ P : Prop, ¬(P ↔ ¬P) :=
by library_search! -- says: `λ (a : Prop), (iff_not_self a).mp`
example {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : a ∣ c) (h₂ : a ∣ b + c) : a ∣ b :=
by library_search -- says `exact (nat.dvd_add_left h₁).mp h₂`
-- Checking examples from issue #2220
example {α : Sort*} (h : empty) : α :=
by library_search
example {α : Type*} (h : empty) : α :=
by library_search
def map_from_sum {A B C : Type} (f : A → C) (g : B → C) : (A ⊕ B) → C := by library_search
-- Test that we can set the transparency level in `apply`
-- to change how aggressively we unfold definitions while trying to apply lemmas.
lemma bind_singleton {α β} (x : α) (f : α → list β) : list.bind [x] f = f x :=
begin
success_if_fail {
library_search { md := tactic.transparency.reducible }, },
library_search!,
end
constant f : ℕ → ℕ
axiom F (a b : ℕ) : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b
example (a b : ℕ) (h : a ≤ b) : f a ≤ f b := by library_search
-- Test #3432
theorem nonzero_gt_one (n : ℕ) : ¬ n = 0 → n ≥ 1 :=
by library_search! -- `exact nat.pos_of_ne_zero`
example (L : list (list ℕ)) : list ℕ :=
by library_search using L
example (n m : ℕ) : ℕ :=
by library_search using n m
example (P Q : list ℕ) (h : ℕ) : list ℕ :=
by library_search using h Q
example (P Q : list ℕ) (h : ℕ) : list ℕ :=
by library_search using P Q
-- Make sure `library_search` finds nothing when we list too many hypotheses after `using`.
example (P Q R S T : list ℕ) : list ℕ :=
begin
success_if_fail { library_search using P Q R S T, },
exact []
end
end test.library_search
|
c188f88acb7b8f5ab4b2a6e754d12fa8c3321cce | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/Lean3Lib/init/meta/tagged_format_auto.lean | de0ea6b37256ddda493645042df6922a6dce91d3 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 409 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) E.W.Ayers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: E.W.Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.tactic
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.meta.expr_address
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.control.default
namespace Mathlib
/-- An alternative to format that keeps structural information stored as a tag. -/
end Mathlib |
ac2587e05c545e9c2fdf2738bd95f037955cdd3b | ee8cdbabf07f77e7be63a449b8483ce308d37218 | /lean/src/valid/mathd-numbertheory-81.lean | d1ca117fe6c95e814e13701298fb881b25bb9f19 | [
"MIT",
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | zeta1999/miniF2F | 6d66c75d1c18152e224d07d5eed57624f731d4b7 | c1ba9629559c5273c92ec226894baa0c1ce27861 | refs/heads/main | 1,681,897,460,642 | 1,620,646,361,000 | 1,620,646,361,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 236 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 OpenAI. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kunhao Zheng
-/
import data.nat.basic
import data.real.basic
example : 71 % 3 = 2 :=
begin
norm_num,
end
|
c0fec1c3a92af3fb253b2a93815c171c311ea989 | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/topology/metric_space/pi_Lp.lean | a7bf124eb1e5b3cddfb0c7b7345088a161eb8e2f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,043 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.mean_inequalities
/-!
# `L^p` distance on finite products of metric spaces
Given finitely many metric spaces, one can put the max distance on their product, but there is also
a whole family of natural distances, indexed by a real parameter `p ∈ [1, ∞)`, that also induce
the product topology. We define them in this file. The distance on `Π i, α i` is given by
$$
d(x, y) = \left(\sum d(x_i, y_i)^p\right)^{1/p}.
$$
We give instances of this construction for emetric spaces, metric spaces, normed groups and normed
spaces.
To avoid conflicting instances, all these are defined on a copy of the original Pi type, named
`pi_Lp p hp α`, where `hp : 1 ≤ p`. This assumption is included in the definition of the type
to make sure that it is always available to typeclass inference to construct the instances.
We ensure that the topology and uniform structure on `pi_Lp p hp α` are (defeq to) the product
topology and product uniformity, to be able to use freely continuity statements for the coordinate
functions, for instance.
## Implementation notes
We only deal with the `L^p` distance on a product of finitely many metric spaces, which may be
distinct. A closely related construction is the `L^p` norm on the space of
functions from a measure space to a normed space, where the norm is
$$
\left(\int ∥f (x)∥^p dμ\right)^{1/p}.
$$
However, the topology induced by this construction is not the product topology, this only
defines a seminorm (as almost everywhere zero functions have zero `L^p` norm), and some functions
have infinite `L^p` norm. All these subtleties are not present in the case of finitely many
metric spaces (which corresponds to the basis which is a finite space with the counting measure),
hence it is worth devoting a file to this specific case which is particularly well behaved.
The general case is not yet formalized in mathlib.
To prove that the topology (and the uniform structure) on a finite product with the `L^p` distance
are the same as those coming from the `L^∞` distance, we could argue that the `L^p` and `L^∞` norms
are equivalent on `ℝ^n` for abstract (norm equivalence) reasons. Instead, we give a more explicit
(easy) proof which provides a comparison between these two norms with explicit constants.
-/
open real set filter
open_locale big_operators uniformity topological_space
noncomputable theory
variables {ι : Type*}
/-- A copy of a Pi type, on which we will put the `L^p` distance. Since the Pi type itself is
already endowed with the `L^∞` distance, we need the type synonym to avoid confusing typeclass
resolution. Also, we let it depend on `p`, to get a whole family of type on which we can put
different distances, and we provide the assumption `hp` in the definition, to make it available
to typeclass resolution when it looks for a distance on `pi_Lp p hp α`. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments]
def pi_Lp {ι : Type*} (p : ℝ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (α : ι → Type*) : Type* := Π (i : ι), α i
instance {ι : Type*} (p : ℝ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (α : ι → Type*) [∀ i, inhabited (α i)] :
inhabited (pi_Lp p hp α) :=
⟨λ i, default (α i)⟩
namespace pi_Lp
variables (p : ℝ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (α : ι → Type*)
/-- Canonical bijection between `pi_Lp p hp α` and the original Pi type. We introduce it to be able
to compare the `L^p` and `L^∞` distances through it. -/
protected def equiv : pi_Lp p hp α ≃ Π (i : ι), α i :=
equiv.refl _
section
/-!
### The uniformity on finite `L^p` products is the product uniformity
In this section, we put the `L^p` edistance on `pi_Lp p hp α`, and we check that the uniformity
coming from this edistance coincides with the product uniformity, by showing that the canonical
map to the Pi type (with the `L^∞` distance) is a uniform embedding, as it is both Lipschitz and
antiLipschitz.
We only register this emetric space structure as a temporary instance, as the true instance (to be
registered later) will have as uniformity exactly the product uniformity, instead of the one coming
from the edistance (which is equal to it, but not defeq). See Note [forgetful inheritance]
explaining why having definitionally the right uniformity is often important.
-/
variables [∀ i, emetric_space (α i)] [fintype ι]
/-- Endowing the space `pi_Lp p hp α` with the `L^p` edistance. This definition is not satisfactory,
as it does not register the fact that the topology and the uniform structure coincide with the
product one. Therefore, we do not register it as an instance. Using this as a temporary emetric
space instance, we will show that the uniform structure is equal (but not defeq) to the product one,
and then register an instance in which we replace the uniform structure by the product one using
this emetric space and `emetric_space.replace_uniformity`. -/
def emetric_aux : emetric_space (pi_Lp p hp α) :=
have pos : 0 < p := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp,
{ edist := λ f g, (∑ (i : ι), (edist (f i) (g i)) ^ p) ^ (1/p),
edist_self := λ f, by simp [edist, ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos pos,
ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos (inv_pos.2 pos)],
edist_comm := λ f g, by simp [edist, edist_comm],
edist_triangle := λ f g h, calc
(∑ (i : ι), edist (f i) (h i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∑ (i : ι), (edist (f i) (g i) + edist (g i) (h i)) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) :
begin
apply ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (div_nonneg zero_le_one pos),
refine finset.sum_le_sum (λ i hi, _),
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow (edist_triangle _ _ _) (le_trans zero_le_one hp)
end
... ≤
(∑ (i : ι), edist (f i) (g i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑ (i : ι), edist (g i) (h i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) :
ennreal.Lp_add_le _ _ _ hp,
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := λ f g hfg,
begin
simp [edist, ennreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, pos, asymm pos, finset.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg] at hfg,
exact funext hfg
end }
local attribute [instance] pi_Lp.emetric_aux
lemma lipschitz_with_equiv : lipschitz_with 1 (pi_Lp.equiv p hp α) :=
begin
have pos : 0 < p := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp,
have cancel : p * (1/p) = 1 := mul_div_cancel' 1 (ne_of_gt pos),
assume x y,
simp only [edist, forall_prop_of_true, one_mul, finset.mem_univ, finset.sup_le_iff,
ennreal.coe_one],
assume i,
calc
edist (x i) (y i) = (edist (x i) (y i) ^ p) ^ (1/p) :
by simp [← ennreal.rpow_mul, cancel, -one_div_eq_inv]
... ≤ (∑ (i : ι), edist (x i) (y i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) :
begin
apply ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (div_nonneg zero_le_one pos),
exact finset.single_le_sum (λ i hi, (bot_le : (0 : ennreal) ≤ _)) (finset.mem_univ i)
end
end
lemma antilipschitz_with_equiv :
antilipschitz_with ((fintype.card ι : nnreal) ^ (1/p)) (pi_Lp.equiv p hp α) :=
begin
have pos : 0 < p := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp,
have cancel : p * (1/p) = 1 := mul_div_cancel' 1 (ne_of_gt pos),
assume x y,
simp [edist, -one_div_eq_inv],
calc (∑ (i : ι), edist (x i) (y i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∑ (i : ι), edist (pi_Lp.equiv p hp α x) (pi_Lp.equiv p hp α y) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) :
begin
apply ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (div_nonneg zero_le_one pos),
apply finset.sum_le_sum (λ i hi, _),
apply ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (le_of_lt pos),
exact finset.le_sup (finset.mem_univ i)
end
... = (((fintype.card ι : nnreal)) ^ (1/p) : nnreal) *
edist (pi_Lp.equiv p hp α x) (pi_Lp.equiv p hp α y) :
begin
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, finset.card_univ, ennreal.rpow_one, finset.sum_const,
ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (div_nonneg zero_le_one pos), ←ennreal.rpow_mul, cancel],
have : (fintype.card ι : ennreal) = (fintype.card ι : nnreal) :=
(ennreal.coe_nat (fintype.card ι)).symm,
rw [this, ennreal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (div_nonneg zero_le_one pos)]
end
end
lemma aux_uniformity_eq :
𝓤 (pi_Lp p hp α) = @uniformity _ (Pi.uniform_space _) :=
begin
have A : uniform_embedding (pi_Lp.equiv p hp α) :=
(antilipschitz_with_equiv p hp α).uniform_embedding
(lipschitz_with_equiv p hp α).uniform_continuous,
have : (λ (x : pi_Lp p hp α × pi_Lp p hp α),
((pi_Lp.equiv p hp α) x.fst, (pi_Lp.equiv p hp α) x.snd)) = id,
by ext i; refl,
rw [← A.comap_uniformity, this, comap_id]
end
end
/-! ### Instances on finite `L^p` products -/
instance uniform_space [∀ i, uniform_space (α i)] : uniform_space (pi_Lp p hp α) :=
Pi.uniform_space _
variable [fintype ι]
/-- emetric space instance on the product of finitely many emetric spaces, using the `L^p`
edistance, and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance [∀ i, emetric_space (α i)] : emetric_space (pi_Lp p hp α) :=
(emetric_aux p hp α).replace_uniformity (aux_uniformity_eq p hp α).symm
protected lemma edist {p : ℝ} {hp : 1 ≤ p} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, emetric_space (α i)] (x y : pi_Lp p hp α) :
edist x y = (∑ (i : ι), (edist (x i) (y i)) ^ p) ^ (1/p) := rfl
/-- metric space instance on the product of finitely many metric spaces, using the `L^p` distance,
and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance [∀ i, metric_space (α i)] : metric_space (pi_Lp p hp α) :=
begin
/- we construct the instance from the emetric space instance to avoid checking again that the
uniformity is the same as the product uniformity, but we register nevertheless a nice formula
for the distance -/
have pos : 0 < p := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp,
refine emetric_space.to_metric_space_of_dist
(λf g, (∑ (i : ι), (dist (f i) (g i)) ^ p) ^ (1/p)) (λ f g, _) (λ f g, _),
{ simp [pi_Lp.edist, ennreal.rpow_eq_top_iff, asymm pos, pos,
ennreal.sum_eq_top_iff, edist_ne_top] },
{ have A : ∀ (i : ι), i ∈ (finset.univ : finset ι) → edist (f i) (g i) ^ p < ⊤ :=
λ i hi, by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, edist_ne_top, le_of_lt pos],
simp [dist, -one_div_eq_inv, pi_Lp.edist, ← ennreal.to_real_rpow,
ennreal.to_real_sum A, dist_edist] }
end
protected lemma dist {p : ℝ} {hp : 1 ≤ p} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, metric_space (α i)] (x y : pi_Lp p hp α) :
dist x y = (∑ (i : ι), (dist (x i) (y i)) ^ p) ^ (1/p) := rfl
/-- normed group instance on the product of finitely many normed groups, using the `L^p` norm. -/
instance normed_group [∀i, normed_group (α i)] : normed_group (pi_Lp p hp α) :=
{ norm := λf, (∑ (i : ι), norm (f i) ^ p) ^ (1/p),
dist_eq := λ x y, by { simp [pi_Lp.dist, dist_eq_norm], refl },
.. pi.add_comm_group }
lemma norm_eq {p : ℝ} {hp : 1 ≤ p} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀i, normed_group (α i)] (f : pi_Lp p hp α) :
∥f∥ = (∑ (i : ι), ∥f i∥ ^ p) ^ (1/p) := rfl
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
/-- The product of finitely many normed spaces is a normed space, with the `L^p` norm. -/
instance normed_space [∀i, normed_group (α i)] [∀i, normed_space 𝕜 (α i)] :
normed_space 𝕜 (pi_Lp p hp α) :=
{ norm_smul_le :=
begin
assume c f,
have : p * (1 / p) = 1 := mul_div_cancel' 1 (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp)),
simp only [pi_Lp.norm_eq, norm_smul, mul_rpow, norm_nonneg, ←finset.mul_sum, pi.smul_apply],
rw [mul_rpow (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _), ← rpow_mul (norm_nonneg _),
this, rpow_one],
exact finset.sum_nonneg (λ i hi, rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
end,
.. pi.semimodule ι α 𝕜 }
/- Register simplification lemmas for the applications of `pi_Lp` elements, as the usual lemmas
for Pi types will not trigger. -/
variables {𝕜 p hp α}
[∀i, normed_group (α i)] [∀i, normed_space 𝕜 (α i)] (c : 𝕜) (x y : pi_Lp p hp α) (i : ι)
@[simp] lemma add_apply : (x + y) i = x i + y i := rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_apply : (x - y) i = x i - y i := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_apply : (c • x) i = c • x i := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_apply : (-x) i = - (x i) := rfl
end pi_Lp
|
54951f65d402514f6a14e53ee8ddd7cb3a9190dd | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/category_theory/limits/constructions/over/connected.lean | ce2eb0a83e7257e3d809467395f0c668636d323e | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,213 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Reid Barton, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.category_theory.over
import Mathlib.category_theory.limits.connected
import Mathlib.category_theory.limits.creates
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u v
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Connected limits in the over category
Shows that the forgetful functor `over B ⥤ C` creates connected limits, in particular `over B` has
any connected limit which `C` has.
-/
namespace category_theory.over
namespace creates_connected
/--
(Impl) Given a diagram in the over category, produce a natural transformation from the
diagram legs to the specific object.
-/
def nat_trans_in_over {J : Type v} [small_category J] {C : Type u} [category C] {B : C} (F : J ⥤ over B) : F ⋙ forget B ⟶ functor.obj (functor.const J) B :=
nat_trans.mk fun (j : J) => comma.hom (functor.obj F j)
/--
(Impl) Given a cone in the base category, raise it to a cone in the over category. Note this is
where the connected assumption is used.
-/
@[simp] theorem raise_cone_π_app {J : Type v} [small_category J] {C : Type u} [category C] [is_connected J] {B : C} {F : J ⥤ over B} (c : limits.cone (F ⋙ forget B)) (j : J) : nat_trans.app (limits.cone.π (raise_cone c)) j = hom_mk (nat_trans.app (limits.cone.π c) j) :=
Eq.refl (nat_trans.app (limits.cone.π (raise_cone c)) j)
theorem raised_cone_lowers_to_original {J : Type v} [small_category J] {C : Type u} [category C] [is_connected J] {B : C} {F : J ⥤ over B} (c : limits.cone (F ⋙ forget B)) (t : limits.is_limit c) : functor.map_cone (forget B) (raise_cone c) = c := sorry
/-- (Impl) Show that the raised cone is a limit. -/
def raised_cone_is_limit {J : Type v} [small_category J] {C : Type u} [category C] [is_connected J] {B : C} {F : J ⥤ over B} {c : limits.cone (F ⋙ forget B)} (t : limits.is_limit c) : limits.is_limit (raise_cone c) :=
limits.is_limit.mk fun (s : limits.cone F) => hom_mk (limits.is_limit.lift t (functor.map_cone (forget B) s))
end creates_connected
/-- The forgetful functor from the over category creates any connected limit. -/
protected instance forget_creates_connected_limits {J : Type v} [small_category J] {C : Type u} [category C] [is_connected J] {B : C} : creates_limits_of_shape J (forget B) :=
creates_limits_of_shape.mk
fun (K : J ⥤ over B) =>
creates_limit_of_reflects_iso
fun (c : limits.cone (K ⋙ forget B)) (t : limits.is_limit c) =>
lifts_to_limit.mk
(liftable_cone.mk (creates_connected.raise_cone c)
(eq_to_iso (creates_connected.raised_cone_lowers_to_original c t)))
(creates_connected.raised_cone_is_limit t)
/-- The over category has any connected limit which the original category has. -/
protected instance has_connected_limits {J : Type v} [small_category J] {C : Type u} [category C] {B : C} [is_connected J] [limits.has_limits_of_shape J C] : limits.has_limits_of_shape J (over B) :=
limits.has_limits_of_shape.mk fun (F : J ⥤ over B) => has_limit_of_created F (forget B)
|
89e9026a39194f6ce44924c3a9a4d4c271e430e6 | dc253be9829b840f15d96d986e0c13520b085033 | /homotopy/susp_pset.hlean | c2956d2c47c8492e9c9aada6838561b7a17ec427 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | cmu-phil/Spectral | 4ce68e5c1ef2a812ffda5260e9f09f41b85ae0ea | 3b078f5f1de251637decf04bd3fc8aa01930a6b3 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,119,195,535 | 1,684,169,772,000 | 1,684,169,772,000 | 46,450,197 | 42 | 13 | null | 1,505,516,767,000 | 1,447,883,921,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,275 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ulrik Buchholtz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ulrik Buchholtz
-/
import algebra.group_theory hit.set_quotient types.list homotopy.vankampen
homotopy.susp .pushout ..algebra.free_group
open eq pointed equiv is_equiv is_trunc set_quotient sum list susp trunc algebra
group pi pushout is_conn fiber unit function paths
-- TODO: move to lib
namespace category
open iso
definition Groupoid_opposite [constructor] (C : Groupoid) : Groupoid :=
groupoid.MK (Opposite C) (λ x y f, @is_iso.mk _ (Opposite C) x y f
(@is_iso.inverse _ C y x f ((@groupoid.all_iso _ C y x f)))
(@is_iso.right_inverse _ C y x f ((@groupoid.all_iso _ C y x f)))
(@is_iso.left_inverse _ C y x f ((@groupoid.all_iso _ C y x f))))
definition hom_Group (C : Groupoid) (x : C) : Group :=
Group.mk (hom x x) (hom_group x)
definition fundamental_hom_group (A : Type*) : hom_Group (Groupoid_opposite (Π₁ A)) (Point A) ≃g π₁ A :=
begin
fapply isomorphism_of_equiv,
{ reflexivity },
{ intros p q, reflexivity }
end
-- [H : is_conn 0 A] : Groupoid_opposite (Π₁ A) ≃c Groupoid_of_Group (π₁ A)
end category open category
-- special purpose lemmas
definition tr_trunc_eq (A : Type) (a : A) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (q : x = a)
: transport (λ(z : A), trunc 0 (z = a)) p (tr q) = tr (p⁻¹ ⬝ q) :=
by induction p; induction q; reflexivity
namespace susp
section
universe variable u
parameters (A : pType.{u}) [H : is_set A]
include H
local notation `F` := Π₁⇒ (λ(a : A), star)
local abbreviation C : Groupoid := Groupoid_bpushout (@id A) F F
local abbreviation N : C := inl star
local abbreviation S : C := inr star
-- this goes via Groupoid_opposite (Π₁ (⅀ A)) ≃c Groupoid_of_Group (free_group A)
-- definition fundamental_group_of_susp : π₁(⅀ A) ≃g free_group A :=
-- sorry
definition pglueNS (a : A) : hom N S :=
class_of [ bpushout_prehom_index.DE (@id A) F F a ]
definition pglueSN (a : A) : hom S N :=
class_of [ bpushout_prehom_index.ED (@id A) F F a ]
definition f : A × hom N N → hom S N :=
prod.rec (λ a p, p ∘ pglueSN a)
definition g : A × trunc 0 (@susp.north A = @susp.north A) → trunc 0 (@susp.south A = @susp.north A) :=
prod.rec (λ a p, tconcat (tr (merid a)⁻¹) p)
definition foo : (Σ(z : susp A), trunc 0 (z = susp.north)) ≃ pushout prod.pr2 g :=
begin
apply equiv.trans !pushout.flattening',
fapply pushout.equiv,
{ apply sigma.equiv_prod },
{ apply sigma.sigma_unit_left },
{ apply sigma.sigma_unit_left },
{ intro z, induction z with a p, induction p with p, reflexivity },
{ intro z, induction z with a p, induction p with p, apply tr_trunc_eq }
end
definition bar : pushout prod.pr2 g ≃ pushout prod.pr2 f :=
begin
fapply pushout.equiv,
{ apply prod.prod_equiv_prod_right, apply vankampen },
{ apply vankampen },
{ apply vankampen },
{ intro z, induction z with a p, reflexivity },
{ intro z, induction z with a p,
change (encode (@id A) (λ(z : A), star) (λ(z : A), star) (tconcat (tr (merid a)⁻¹) p))
= (encode (@id A) (λ(z : A), star) (λ(z : A), star) p ∘ pglueSN a),
revert p, fapply @trunc.rec 0 (@susp.north A = @susp.north A),
{ intro p, apply is_trunc_succ, apply is_trunc_eq, apply is_set_code }, intro p,
apply trans (encode_tcon (@id A) (λ(z : A), star) (λ(z : A), star) (tr (merid a)⁻¹) (tr p)),
apply ap (λ h, encode (@id A) (λ(z : A), star) (λ(z : A), star) (tr p) ∘ h),
apply encode_decode_singleton }
end
definition pfiber_susp_equiv_sigma : pfiber (ptr 1 (⅀ A)) ≃ (Σ(z : susp A), trunc 0 (z = susp.north)) :=
begin
apply equiv.trans !fiber.sigma_char,
apply sigma.sigma_equiv_sigma_right,
intro z, apply tr_eq_tr_equiv
end
definition is_trunc_susp_of_is_set : is_contr (Σ(z : susp A), trunc 0 (z = susp.north)) → is_trunc 1 (susp A) :=
begin
intro K,
apply is_trunc_of_is_equiv_tr,
apply is_equiv_of_is_contr_fun,
fapply @is_conn.elim -1 (ptrunc 1 (⅀ A)),
exact is_contr_equiv_closed_rev pfiber_susp_equiv_sigma K
end
end
end susp
|
467431a171d698cd9f3f9714c679ffcfb6aeef5d | 206422fb9edabf63def0ed2aa3f489150fb09ccb | /src/group_theory/order_of_element.lean | 560fa0db1b3d7212693b1a2c6c9567a9aca04a09 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hamdysalah1/mathlib | b915f86b2503feeae268de369f1b16932321f097 | 95454452f6b3569bf967d35aab8d852b1ddf8017 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,154,116,545 | 1,611,797,994,000 | 1,611,797,994,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,782 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.big_operators.order
import group_theory.coset
import data.nat.totient
import data.int.gcd
import data.set.finite
open function
open_locale big_operators
variables {α : Type*} {s : set α} {a a₁ a₂ b c: α}
-- TODO mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq should be moved elsewhere.
namespace finset
open finset
lemma mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq [decidable_eq α] {f : ℤ → α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}
(hn : 0 < n) (h : ∀i, f (i % n) = f i) :
a ∈ set.range f ↔ a ∈ (finset.range n).image (λi, f i) :=
suffices (∃i, f (i % n) = a) ↔ ∃i, i < n ∧ f ↑i = a, by simpa [h],
have hn' : 0 < (n : ℤ), from int.coe_nat_lt.mpr hn,
iff.intro
(assume ⟨i, hi⟩,
have 0 ≤ i % ↑n, from int.mod_nonneg _ (ne_of_gt hn'),
⟨int.to_nat (i % n),
by rw [←int.coe_nat_lt, int.to_nat_of_nonneg this]; exact ⟨int.mod_lt_of_pos i hn', hi⟩⟩)
(assume ⟨i, hi, ha⟩,
⟨i, by rw [int.mod_eq_of_lt (int.coe_zero_le _) (int.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat_of_lt hi), ha]⟩)
end finset
lemma mem_normalizer_fintype [group α] {s : set α} [fintype s] {x : α}
(h : ∀ n, n ∈ s → x * n * x⁻¹ ∈ s) : x ∈ subgroup.set_normalizer s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable;
haveI := set.fintype_image s (λ n, x * n * x⁻¹); exact
λ n, ⟨h n, λ h₁,
have heq : (λ n, x * n * x⁻¹) '' s = s := set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le
(λ n ⟨y, hy⟩, hy.2 ▸ h y hy.1) (by rw set.card_image_of_injective s conj_injective),
have x * n * x⁻¹ ∈ (λ n, x * n * x⁻¹) '' s := heq.symm ▸ h₁,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := this in conj_injective hy.2 ▸ hy.1⟩
section order_of
variable [group α]
open quotient_group set
instance fintype_bot : fintype (⊥ : subgroup α) := ⟨{1},
by {rintro ⟨x, ⟨hx⟩⟩, exact finset.mem_singleton_self _}⟩
@[simp] lemma card_trivial :
fintype.card (⊥ : subgroup α) = 1 :=
fintype.card_eq_one_iff.2
⟨⟨(1 : α), set.mem_singleton 1⟩, λ ⟨y, hy⟩, subtype.eq $ subgroup.mem_bot.1 hy⟩
variables [fintype α] [dec : decidable_eq α]
lemma card_eq_card_quotient_mul_card_subgroup (s : subgroup α) [fintype s]
[decidable_pred (λ a, a ∈ s)] : fintype.card α = fintype.card (quotient s) * fintype.card s :=
by rw ← fintype.card_prod;
exact fintype.card_congr (subgroup.group_equiv_quotient_times_subgroup)
lemma card_subgroup_dvd_card (s : subgroup α) [fintype s] :
fintype.card s ∣ fintype.card α :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; simp [card_eq_card_quotient_mul_card_subgroup s]
lemma card_quotient_dvd_card (s : subgroup α) [decidable_pred (λ a, a ∈ s)] [fintype s] :
fintype.card (quotient s) ∣ fintype.card α :=
by simp [card_eq_card_quotient_mul_card_subgroup s]
lemma exists_gpow_eq_one (a : α) : ∃i≠0, a ^ (i:ℤ) = 1 :=
have ¬ injective (λi:ℤ, a ^ i),
from not_injective_infinite_fintype _,
let ⟨i, j, a_eq, ne⟩ := show ∃(i j : ℤ), a ^ i = a ^ j ∧ i ≠ j,
by rw [injective] at this; simpa [not_forall] in
have a ^ (i - j) = 1,
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, gpow_add, gpow_neg, a_eq],
⟨i - j, sub_ne_zero.mpr ne, this⟩
lemma exists_pow_eq_one (a : α) : ∃i > 0, a ^ i = 1 :=
let ⟨i, hi, eq⟩ := exists_gpow_eq_one a in
begin
cases i,
{ exact ⟨i, nat.pos_of_ne_zero (by simp [int.of_nat_eq_coe, *] at *), eq⟩ },
{ exact ⟨i + 1, dec_trivial, inv_eq_one.1 eq⟩ }
end
include dec
/-- `order_of a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `a ^ n = 1` -/
def order_of (a : α) : ℕ := nat.find (exists_pow_eq_one a)
lemma pow_order_of_eq_one (a : α) : a ^ order_of a = 1 :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := nat.find_spec (exists_pow_eq_one a) in h₂
lemma order_of_pos (a : α) : 0 < order_of a :=
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := nat.find_spec (exists_pow_eq_one a) in h₁
private lemma pow_injective_aux {n m : ℕ} (a : α) (h : n ≤ m)
(hn : n < order_of a) (hm : m < order_of a) (eq : a ^ n = a ^ m) : n = m :=
decidable.by_contradiction $ assume ne : n ≠ m,
have h₁ : m - n > 0, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero (by simp [nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add h, ne.symm]),
have h₂ : a ^ (m - n) = 1, by simp [pow_sub _ h, eq],
have le : order_of a ≤ m - n, from nat.find_min' (exists_pow_eq_one a) ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
have lt : m - n < order_of a,
from (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add h).mpr $ nat.lt_add_left _ _ _ hm,
lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_le_of_lt le lt)
lemma pow_injective_of_lt_order_of {n m : ℕ} (a : α)
(hn : n < order_of a) (hm : m < order_of a) (eq : a ^ n = a ^ m) : n = m :=
(le_total n m).elim
(assume h, pow_injective_aux a h hn hm eq)
(assume h, (pow_injective_aux a h hm hn eq.symm).symm)
lemma order_of_le_card_univ : order_of a ≤ fintype.card α :=
finset.card_le_of_inj_on ((^) a)
(assume n _, fintype.complete _)
(assume i j, pow_injective_of_lt_order_of a)
lemma pow_eq_mod_order_of {n : ℕ} : a ^ n = a ^ (n % order_of a) :=
calc a ^ n = a ^ (n % order_of a + order_of a * (n / order_of a)) :
by rw [nat.mod_add_div]
... = a ^ (n % order_of a) :
by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one]
lemma gpow_eq_mod_order_of {i : ℤ} : a ^ i = a ^ (i % order_of a) :=
calc a ^ i = a ^ (i % order_of a + order_of a * (i / order_of a)) :
by rw [int.mod_add_div]
... = a ^ (i % order_of a) :
by simp [gpow_add, gpow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one]
lemma mem_gpowers_iff_mem_range_order_of {a a' : α} :
a' ∈ subgroup.gpowers a ↔ a' ∈ (finset.range (order_of a)).image ((^) a : ℕ → α) :=
finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq
(order_of_pos a)
(assume i, gpow_eq_mod_order_of.symm)
instance decidable_gpowers : decidable_pred (subgroup.gpowers a : set α) :=
assume a', decidable_of_iff'
(a' ∈ (finset.range (order_of a)).image ((^) a))
mem_gpowers_iff_mem_range_order_of
lemma order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} (h : a ^ n = 1) : order_of a ∣ n :=
by_contradiction
(λ h₁, nat.find_min _ (show n % order_of a < order_of a,
from nat.mod_lt _ (order_of_pos _))
⟨nat.pos_of_ne_zero (mt nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero h₁), by rwa ← pow_eq_mod_order_of⟩)
lemma order_of_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : order_of a ∣ n ↔ a ^ n = 1 :=
⟨λ h, by rw [pow_eq_mod_order_of, nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, pow_zero], order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
lemma order_of_le_of_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : a ^ n = 1) : order_of a ≤ n :=
nat.find_min' (exists_pow_eq_one a) ⟨hn, h⟩
lemma sum_card_order_of_eq_card_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
∑ m in (finset.range n.succ).filter (∣ n), (finset.univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = m)).card
= (finset.univ.filter (λ a : α, a ^ n = 1)).card :=
calc ∑ m in (finset.range n.succ).filter (∣ n), (finset.univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = m)).card
= _ : (finset.card_bUnion (by { intros, apply finset.disjoint_filter.2, cc })).symm
... = _ : congr_arg finset.card (finset.ext (begin
assume a,
suffices : order_of a ≤ n ∧ order_of a ∣ n ↔ a ^ n = 1,
{ simpa [nat.lt_succ_iff], },
exact ⟨λ h, let ⟨m, hm⟩ := h.2 in by rw [hm, pow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one, one_pow],
λ h, ⟨order_of_le_of_pow_eq_one hn h, order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one h⟩⟩
end))
section
local attribute [instance] set_fintype
lemma order_eq_card_gpowers : order_of a = fintype.card (subgroup.gpowers a : set α) :=
begin
refine (finset.card_eq_of_bijective _ _ _ _).symm,
{ exact λn hn, ⟨gpow a n, ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩ },
{ exact assume ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ _,
have pos: (0:int) < order_of a,
from int.coe_nat_lt.mpr $ order_of_pos a,
have 0 ≤ i % (order_of a),
from int.mod_nonneg _ $ ne_of_gt pos,
⟨int.to_nat (i % order_of a),
by rw [← int.coe_nat_lt, int.to_nat_of_nonneg this];
exact ⟨int.mod_lt_of_pos _ pos, subtype.eq gpow_eq_mod_order_of.symm⟩⟩ },
{ intros, exact finset.mem_univ _ },
{ exact assume i j hi hj eq, pow_injective_of_lt_order_of a hi hj $ by simpa using eq }
end
@[simp] lemma order_of_one : order_of (1 : α) = 1 :=
by rw [order_eq_card_gpowers, fintype.card_eq_one_iff];
exact ⟨⟨1, 0, rfl⟩, λ ⟨a, i, ha⟩, by simp [ha.symm]⟩
@[simp] lemma order_of_eq_one_iff : order_of a = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
⟨λ h, by conv { to_lhs, rw [← pow_one a, ← h, pow_order_of_eq_one] }, λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma order_of_eq_prime {p : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime]
(hg : a^p = 1) (hg1 : a ≠ 1) : order_of a = p :=
(hp.2 _ (order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hg)).resolve_left (mt order_of_eq_one_iff.1 hg1)
section classical
open_locale classical
open quotient_group subgroup
/- TODO: use cardinal theory, introduce `card : set α → ℕ`, or setup decidability for cosets -/
lemma order_of_dvd_card_univ : order_of a ∣ fintype.card α :=
have ft_prod : fintype (quotient (gpowers a) × (gpowers a)),
from fintype.of_equiv α group_equiv_quotient_times_subgroup,
have ft_s : fintype (gpowers a),
from @fintype.fintype_prod_right _ _ _ ft_prod _,
have ft_cosets : fintype (quotient (gpowers a)),
from @fintype.fintype_prod_left _ _ _ ft_prod ⟨⟨1, (gpowers a).one_mem⟩⟩,
have eq₁ : fintype.card α = @fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @fintype.card _ ft_s,
from calc fintype.card α = @fintype.card _ ft_prod :
@fintype.card_congr _ _ _ ft_prod group_equiv_quotient_times_subgroup
... = @fintype.card _ (@prod.fintype _ _ ft_cosets ft_s) :
congr_arg (@fintype.card _) $ subsingleton.elim _ _
... = @fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @fintype.card _ ft_s :
@fintype.card_prod _ _ ft_cosets ft_s,
have eq₂ : order_of a = @fintype.card _ ft_s,
from calc order_of a = _ : order_eq_card_gpowers
... = _ : congr_arg (@fintype.card _) $ subsingleton.elim _ _,
dvd.intro (@fintype.card (quotient (subgroup.gpowers a)) ft_cosets) $
by rw [eq₁, eq₂, mul_comm]
omit dec
@[simp] lemma pow_card_eq_one (a : α) : a ^ fintype.card α = 1 :=
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := @order_of_dvd_card_univ _ a _ _ _ in
by simp [hm, pow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one]
lemma mem_powers_iff_mem_gpowers {a x : α} : x ∈ submonoid.powers a ↔ x ∈ gpowers a :=
⟨λ ⟨n, hn⟩, ⟨n, by simp * at *⟩,
λ ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨(i % order_of a).nat_abs,
by rwa [← gpow_coe_nat, int.nat_abs_of_nonneg (int.mod_nonneg _
(int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 (order_of_pos _))), ← gpow_eq_mod_order_of]⟩⟩
lemma powers_eq_gpowers (a : α) : (submonoid.powers a : set α) = gpowers a :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_powers_iff_mem_gpowers
end classical
open nat subgroup
lemma order_of_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : order_of (a ^ n) = order_of a / gcd (order_of a) n :=
dvd_antisymm
(order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
(by rw [← pow_mul, ← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (gcd_dvd_left _ _), mul_comm,
nat.mul_div_assoc _ (gcd_dvd_right _ _), pow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one, one_pow]))
(have gcd_pos : 0 < gcd (order_of a) n, from gcd_pos_of_pos_left n (order_of_pos a),
have hdvd : order_of a ∣ n * order_of (a ^ n),
from order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (by rw [pow_mul, pow_order_of_eq_one]),
coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right (coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd gcd_pos)
(dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right gcd_pos
(by rwa [nat.div_mul_cancel (gcd_dvd_left _ _), mul_assoc,
nat.div_mul_cancel (gcd_dvd_right _ _), mul_comm])))
lemma image_range_order_of (a : α) :
finset.image (λ i, a ^ i) (finset.range (order_of a)) = (gpowers a : set α).to_finset :=
by { ext x, rw [set.mem_to_finset, mem_coe, mem_gpowers_iff_mem_range_order_of] }
omit dec
open_locale classical
lemma pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff {n : ℕ} {a : α} :
a ^ n = 1 ↔ a ^ (gcd n (fintype.card α)) = 1 :=
⟨λ h, pow_gcd_eq_one _ h $ pow_card_eq_one _,
λ h, let ⟨m, hm⟩ := gcd_dvd_left n (fintype.card α) in
by rw [hm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]⟩
end
end order_of
section cyclic
local attribute [instance] set_fintype
open subgroup
/-- A group is called *cyclic* if it is generated by a single element. -/
class is_cyclic (α : Type*) [group α] : Prop :=
(exists_generator [] : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ gpowers g)
/-- A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have a better
proof of `comm_group`. -/
def is_cyclic.comm_group [hg : group α] [is_cyclic α] : comm_group α :=
{ mul_comm := λ x y, show x * y = y * x,
from let ⟨g, hg⟩ := is_cyclic.exists_generator α in
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := hg x in let ⟨m, hm⟩ := hg y in
hm ▸ hn ▸ gpow_mul_comm _ _ _,
..hg }
lemma is_cyclic_of_order_of_eq_card [group α] [decidable_eq α] [fintype α]
(x : α) (hx : order_of x = fintype.card α) : is_cyclic α :=
⟨⟨x, set.eq_univ_iff_forall.1 $ set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le
(set.subset_univ _)
(by {rw [fintype.card_congr (equiv.set.univ α), ← hx, order_eq_card_gpowers], refl})⟩⟩
lemma is_cyclic_of_prime_card [group α] [fintype α] {p : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime]
(h : fintype.card α = p) : is_cyclic α :=
⟨begin
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g : α, g ≠ 1,
from fintype.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (by { rw h, exact nat.prime.one_lt hp }) 1,
classical, -- for fintype (subgroup.gpowers g)
have : fintype.card (subgroup.gpowers g) ∣ p,
{ rw ←h,
apply card_subgroup_dvd_card },
rw nat.dvd_prime hp at this,
cases this,
{ rw fintype.card_eq_one_iff at this,
cases this with t ht,
suffices : g = 1,
{ contradiction },
have hgt := ht ⟨g, by { change g ∈ subgroup.gpowers g, exact subgroup.mem_gpowers g }⟩,
rw [←ht 1] at hgt,
change (⟨_, _⟩ : subgroup.gpowers g) = ⟨_, _⟩ at hgt,
simpa using hgt },
{ use g,
intro x,
rw [←h] at this,
rw subgroup.eq_top_of_card_eq _ this,
exact subgroup.mem_top _ }
end⟩
lemma order_of_eq_card_of_forall_mem_gpowers [group α] [decidable_eq α] [fintype α]
{g : α} (hx : ∀ x, x ∈ gpowers g) : order_of g = fintype.card α :=
by {rw [← fintype.card_congr (equiv.set.univ α), order_eq_card_gpowers],
simp [hx], apply fintype.card_of_finset', simp, intro x, exact hx x}
instance bot.is_cyclic [group α] : is_cyclic (⊥ : subgroup α) :=
⟨⟨1, λ x, ⟨0, subtype.eq $ eq.symm (subgroup.mem_bot.1 x.2)⟩⟩⟩
instance subgroup.is_cyclic [group α] [is_cyclic α] (H : subgroup α) : is_cyclic H :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := is_cyclic.exists_generator α in
if hx : ∃ (x : α), x ∈ H ∧ x ≠ (1 : α) then
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := hx in
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x in
have hex : ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ g ^ n ∈ H,
from ⟨k.nat_abs, nat.pos_of_ne_zero
(λ h, hx₂ $ by rw [← hk, int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero h, gpow_zero]),
match k, hk with
| (k : ℕ), hk := by rw [int.nat_abs_of_nat, ← gpow_coe_nat, hk]; exact hx₁
| -[1+ k], hk := by rw [int.nat_abs_of_neg_succ_of_nat,
← subgroup.inv_mem_iff H]; simp * at *
end⟩,
⟨⟨⟨g ^ nat.find hex, (nat.find_spec hex).2⟩,
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x in
have hk₁ : g ^ ((nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / nat.find hex)) ∈ gpowers (g ^ nat.find hex),
from ⟨k / nat.find hex, eq.symm $ gpow_mul _ _ _⟩,
have hk₂ : g ^ ((nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / nat.find hex)) ∈ H,
by rw gpow_mul; exact H.gpow_mem (nat.find_spec hex).2 _,
have hk₃ : g ^ (k % nat.find hex) ∈ H,
from (subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right H hk₂).1 $
by rw [← gpow_add, int.mod_add_div, hk]; exact hx,
have hk₄ : k % nat.find hex = (k % nat.find hex).nat_abs,
by rw int.nat_abs_of_nonneg (int.mod_nonneg _
(int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 (nat.find_spec hex).1)),
have hk₅ : g ^ (k % nat.find hex ).nat_abs ∈ H,
by rwa [← gpow_coe_nat, ← hk₄],
have hk₆ : (k % (nat.find hex : ℤ)).nat_abs = 0,
from by_contradiction (λ h,
nat.find_min hex (int.coe_nat_lt.1 $ by rw [← hk₄];
exact int.mod_lt_of_pos _ (int.coe_nat_pos.2 (nat.find_spec hex).1))
⟨nat.pos_of_ne_zero h, hk₅⟩),
⟨k / (nat.find hex : ℤ), subtype.ext_iff_val.2 begin
suffices : g ^ ((nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / nat.find hex)) = x,
{ simpa [gpow_mul] },
rw [int.mul_div_cancel' (int.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero (int.eq_zero_of_nat_abs_eq_zero hk₆)), hk]
end⟩⟩⟩
else
have H = (⊥ : subgroup α), from subgroup.ext $ λ x, ⟨λ h, by simp at *; tauto,
λ h, by rw [subgroup.mem_bot.1 h]; exact H.one_mem⟩,
by clear _let_match; substI this; apply_instance
open finset nat
lemma is_cyclic.card_pow_eq_one_le [group α] [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] [is_cyclic α] {n : ℕ}
(hn0 : 0 < n) : (univ.filter (λ a : α, a ^ n = 1)).card ≤ n :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := is_cyclic.exists_generator α in
calc (univ.filter (λ a : α, a ^ n = 1)).card
≤ ((gpowers (g ^ (fintype.card α / (gcd n (fintype.card α))))) : set α).to_finset.card :
card_le_of_subset (λ x hx, let ⟨m, hm⟩ := show x ∈ submonoid.powers g,
from mem_powers_iff_mem_gpowers.2 $ hg x in
set.mem_to_finset.2 ⟨(m / (fintype.card α / (gcd n (fintype.card α))) : ℕ),
have hgmn : g ^ (m * gcd n (fintype.card α)) = 1,
by rw [pow_mul, hm, ← pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff]; exact (mem_filter.1 hx).2,
begin
rw [gpow_coe_nat, ← pow_mul, nat.mul_div_cancel_left', hm],
refine dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (gcd_pos_of_pos_left (fintype.card α) hn0) _,
conv {to_lhs, rw [nat.div_mul_cancel (gcd_dvd_right _ _), ← order_of_eq_card_of_forall_mem_gpowers hg]},
exact order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hgmn
end⟩)
... ≤ n :
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := gcd_dvd_right n (fintype.card α) in
have hm0 : 0 < m, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero
(λ hm0, (by rw [hm0, mul_zero, fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hm; exact hm 1)),
begin
rw [← fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ _, set.mem_to_finset), ← order_eq_card_gpowers,
order_of_pow, order_of_eq_card_of_forall_mem_gpowers hg],
rw [hm] {occs := occurrences.pos [2,3]},
rw [nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ hn0), gcd_mul_left_left,
hm, nat.mul_div_cancel _ hm0],
exact le_of_dvd hn0 (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
end
lemma is_cyclic.exists_monoid_generator (α : Type*) [group α] [fintype α] [is_cyclic α] :
∃ x : α, ∀ y : α, y ∈ submonoid.powers x :=
by { simp only [mem_powers_iff_mem_gpowers], exact is_cyclic.exists_generator α }
section
variables [group α] [decidable_eq α] [fintype α]
lemma is_cyclic.image_range_order_of (ha : ∀ x : α, x ∈ gpowers a) :
finset.image (λ i, a ^ i) (range (order_of a)) = univ :=
begin
simp_rw [←subgroup.mem_coe] at ha,
simp only [image_range_order_of, set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr ha],
convert set.to_finset_univ
end
lemma is_cyclic.image_range_card (ha : ∀ x : α, x ∈ gpowers a) :
finset.image (λ i, a ^ i) (range (fintype.card α)) = univ :=
by rw [← order_of_eq_card_of_forall_mem_gpowers ha, is_cyclic.image_range_order_of ha]
end
section totient
variables [group α] [decidable_eq α] [fintype α] (hn : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → (univ.filter (λ a : α, a ^ n = 1)).card ≤ n)
include hn
lemma card_pow_eq_one_eq_order_of_aux (a : α) :
(finset.univ.filter (λ b : α, b ^ order_of a = 1)).card = order_of a :=
le_antisymm
(hn _ (order_of_pos _))
(calc order_of a = @fintype.card (gpowers a) (id _) : order_eq_card_gpowers
... ≤ @fintype.card (↑(univ.filter (λ b : α, b ^ order_of a = 1)) : set α)
(fintype.of_finset _ (λ _, iff.rfl)) :
@fintype.card_le_of_injective (gpowers a) (↑(univ.filter (λ b : α, b ^ order_of a = 1)) : set α)
(id _) (id _) (λ b, ⟨b.1, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_univ _,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := b.2 in
by rw [← hi, ← gpow_coe_nat, ← gpow_mul, mul_comm, gpow_mul, gpow_coe_nat,
pow_order_of_eq_one, one_gpow]⟩⟩) (λ _ _ h, subtype.eq (subtype.mk.inj h))
... = (univ.filter (λ b : α, b ^ order_of a = 1)).card : fintype.card_of_finset _ _)
open_locale nat -- use φ for nat.totient
private lemma card_order_of_eq_totient_aux₁ :
∀ {d : ℕ}, d ∣ fintype.card α → 0 < (univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = d)).card →
(univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = d)).card = φ d
| 0 := λ hd hd0,
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := card_pos.1 hd0 in absurd (mem_filter.1 ha).2 $ ne_of_gt $ order_of_pos a
| (d+1) := λ hd hd0,
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := card_pos.1 hd0 in
have ha : order_of a = d.succ, from (mem_filter.1 ha).2,
have h : ∑ m in (range d.succ).filter (∣ d.succ),
(univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = m)).card =
∑ m in (range d.succ).filter (∣ d.succ), φ m, from
finset.sum_congr rfl
(λ m hm, have hmd : m < d.succ, from mem_range.1 (mem_filter.1 hm).1,
have hm : m ∣ d.succ, from (mem_filter.1 hm).2,
card_order_of_eq_totient_aux₁ (dvd.trans hm hd) (finset.card_pos.2
⟨a ^ (d.succ / m), mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_univ _,
by rw [order_of_pow, ha, gcd_eq_right (div_dvd_of_dvd hm),
nat.div_div_self hm (succ_pos _)]⟩⟩)),
have hinsert : insert d.succ ((range d.succ).filter (∣ d.succ))
= (range d.succ.succ).filter (∣ d.succ),
from (finset.ext $ λ x, ⟨λ h, (mem_insert.1 h).elim (λ h, by simp [h, range_succ])
(by clear _let_match; simp [range_succ]; tauto), by clear _let_match; simp [range_succ] {contextual := tt}; tauto⟩),
have hinsert₁ : d.succ ∉ (range d.succ).filter (∣ d.succ),
by simp [mem_range, zero_le_one, le_succ],
(add_left_inj (∑ m in (range d.succ).filter (∣ d.succ),
(univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = m)).card)).1
(calc _ = ∑ m in insert d.succ (filter (∣ d.succ) (range d.succ)),
(univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = m)).card :
eq.symm (finset.sum_insert (by simp [mem_range, zero_le_one, le_succ]))
... = ∑ m in (range d.succ.succ).filter (∣ d.succ),
(univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = m)).card :
sum_congr hinsert (λ _ _, rfl)
... = (univ.filter (λ a : α, a ^ d.succ = 1)).card :
sum_card_order_of_eq_card_pow_eq_one (succ_pos d)
... = ∑ m in (range d.succ.succ).filter (∣ d.succ), φ m :
ha ▸ (card_pow_eq_one_eq_order_of_aux hn a).symm ▸ (sum_totient _).symm
... = _ : by rw [h, ← sum_insert hinsert₁];
exact finset.sum_congr hinsert.symm (λ _ _, rfl))
lemma card_order_of_eq_totient_aux₂ {d : ℕ} (hd : d ∣ fintype.card α) :
(univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = d)).card = φ d :=
by_contradiction $ λ h,
have h0 : (univ.filter (λ a : α , order_of a = d)).card = 0 :=
not_not.1 (mt pos_iff_ne_zero.2 (mt (card_order_of_eq_totient_aux₁ hn hd) h)),
let c := fintype.card α in
have hc0 : 0 < c, from fintype.card_pos_iff.2 ⟨1⟩,
lt_irrefl c $
calc c = (univ.filter (λ a : α, a ^ c = 1)).card :
congr_arg card $ by simp [finset.ext_iff, c]
... = ∑ m in (range c.succ).filter (∣ c),
(univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = m)).card :
(sum_card_order_of_eq_card_pow_eq_one hc0).symm
... = ∑ m in ((range c.succ).filter (∣ c)).erase d,
(univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = m)).card :
eq.symm (sum_subset (erase_subset _ _) (λ m hm₁ hm₂,
have m = d, by simp at *; cc,
by simp [*, finset.ext_iff] at *; exact h0))
... ≤ ∑ m in ((range c.succ).filter (∣ c)).erase d, φ m :
sum_le_sum (λ m hm,
have hmc : m ∣ c, by simp at hm; tauto,
(imp_iff_not_or.1 (card_order_of_eq_totient_aux₁ hn hmc)).elim
(λ h, by simp [nat.le_zero_iff.1 (le_of_not_gt h), nat.zero_le])
(λ h, by rw h))
... < φ d + ∑ m in ((range c.succ).filter (∣ c)).erase d, φ m :
lt_add_of_pos_left _ (totient_pos (nat.pos_of_ne_zero
(λ h, pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hc0 (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd $ h ▸ hd))))
... = ∑ m in insert d (((range c.succ).filter (∣ c)).erase d), φ m : eq.symm (sum_insert (by simp))
... = ∑ m in (range c.succ).filter (∣ c), φ m : finset.sum_congr
(finset.insert_erase (mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_range.2 (lt_succ_of_le (le_of_dvd hc0 hd)), hd⟩)) (λ _ _, rfl)
... = c : sum_totient _
lemma is_cyclic_of_card_pow_eq_one_le : is_cyclic α :=
have (univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = fintype.card α)).nonempty,
from (card_pos.1 $
by rw [card_order_of_eq_totient_aux₂ hn (dvd_refl _)];
exact totient_pos (fintype.card_pos_iff.2 ⟨1⟩)),
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := this in
is_cyclic_of_order_of_eq_card x (finset.mem_filter.1 hx).2
end totient
lemma is_cyclic.card_order_of_eq_totient [group α] [is_cyclic α] [decidable_eq α] [fintype α]
{d : ℕ} (hd : d ∣ fintype.card α) : (univ.filter (λ a : α, order_of a = d)).card = totient d :=
card_order_of_eq_totient_aux₂ (λ n, is_cyclic.card_pow_eq_one_le) hd
end cyclic
|
64e50511b9f445c0210cc0f4d397f126ae2948fc | f3849be5d845a1cb97680f0bbbe03b85518312f0 | /tests/lean/no_confusion_type.lean | 0591018f0083a2d7a640cc46f904bfbc2025db37 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bjoeris/lean | 0ed95125d762b17bfcb54dad1f9721f953f92eeb | 4e496b78d5e73545fa4f9a807155113d8e6b0561 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,251,218,281 | 1,495,337,658,000 | 1,495,337,658,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 327 | lean | --
open nat
inductive vector (A : Type) : nat → Type
| vnil : vector nat.zero
| vcons : Π {n : nat}, A → vector n → vector (succ n)
#check vector.no_confusion_type
constants a1 a2 : num
constants v1 v2 : vector num 2
constant P : Type
#reduce vector.no_confusion_type P (vector.vcons a1 v1) (vector.vcons a2 v2)
|
eb4e038f9ab63eb459c9ccdc5cd9359ed7319fca | 7282d49021d38dacd06c4ce45a48d09627687fe0 | /tests/lean/j1.lean | d4fc14a2e89e422967dcf827ee6471a00857b2fc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | steveluc/lean | 5a0b4431acefaf77f15b25bbb49294c2449923ad | 92ba4e8b2d040a799eda7deb8d2a7cdd3e69c496 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,332,256,930 | 1,391,013,244,000 | 1,391,013,244,000 | 16,361,079 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 734 | lean | import tactic
import macros
definition bracket (A : Type) : Bool :=
∀ p : Bool, (A → p) → p
rewrite_set basic
add_rewrite imp_truel imp_truer imp_id eq_id : basic
set_option simp_tac::assumptions false
theorem bracket_eq (x : Bool) : bracket x = x
:= boolext
(assume H : ∀ p : Bool, (x → p) → p,
(have ((x → x) → x) = x : by simp basic) ◂ H x)
(assume H : x,
take p,
assume Hxp : x → p,
Hxp H)
add_rewrite bracket_eq eq_id
theorem coerce (a b : Bool) (H : @eq Type a b) : @eq Bool a b
:= calc a = bracket a : by simp
... = bracket b : @subst Type a b (λ x : Type, bracket a = bracket x) (refl (bracket a)) H
... = b : by simp
|
7ca57693d8dabd1b21acb400af1c7e34cabe87e8 | e39f04f6ff425fe3b3f5e26a8998b817d1dba80f | /category_theory/limits/preserves.lean | 59d06ef6d58b13a791ac171e743a6d06ad251ea3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kristychoi/mathlib | c504b5e8f84e272ea1d8966693c42de7523bf0ec | 257fd84fe98927ff4a5ffe044f68c4e9d235cc75 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,520,722,896 | 1,544,030,145,000 | 1,544,031,933,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,177 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Scott Morrison, Reid Barton
-- Preservation and reflection of (co)limits.
import category_theory.whiskering
import category_theory.limits.limits
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
universes u₁ u₂ u₃ v
variables {C : Type u₁} [𝒞 : category.{u₁ v} C]
variables {D : Type u₂} [𝒟 : category.{u₂ v} D]
include 𝒞 𝒟
variables {J : Type v} [small_category J] {K : J ⥤ C}
/- Note on "preservation of (co)limits"
There are various distinct notions of "preserving limits". The one we
aim to capture here is: A functor F : C → D "preserves limits" if it
sends every limit cone in C to a limit cone in D. Informally, F
preserves all the limits which exist in C.
Note that:
* Of course, we do not want to require F to *strictly* take chosen
limit cones of C to chosen limit cones of D. Indeed, the above
definition makes no reference to a choice of limit cones so it makes
sense without any conditions on C or D.
* Some diagrams in C may have no limit. In this case, there is no
condition on the behavior of F on such diagrams. There are other
notions (such as "flat functor") which impose conditions also on
diagrams in C with no limits, but these are not considered here.
In order to be able to express the property of preserving limits of a
certain form, we say that a functor F preserves the limit of a
diagram K if F sends every limit cone on K to a limit cone. This is
vacuously satisfied when K does not admit a limit, which is consistent
with the above definition of "preserves limits".
-/
class preserves_limit (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v) :=
(preserves : Π {c : cone K}, is_limit c → is_limit (F.map_cone c))
class preserves_colimit (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v) :=
(preserves : Π {c : cocone K}, is_colimit c → is_colimit (F.map_cocone c))
@[class] def preserves_limits_of_shape (J : Type v) [small_category J] (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v) :=
Π {K : J ⥤ C}, preserves_limit K F
@[class] def preserves_colimits_of_shape (J : Type v) [small_category J] (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v) :=
Π {K : J ⥤ C}, preserves_colimit K F
@[class] def preserves_limits (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ (v+1)) :=
Π {J : Type v} {𝒥 : small_category J}, by exactI preserves_limits_of_shape J F
@[class] def preserves_colimits (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ (v+1)) :=
Π {J : Type v} {𝒥 : small_category J}, by exactI preserves_colimits_of_shape J F
instance preserves_limit_subsingleton (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D) : subsingleton (preserves_limit K F) :=
by split; rintros ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩; congr
instance preserves_colimit_subsingleton (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D) : subsingleton (preserves_colimit K F) :=
by split; rintros ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩; congr
instance preserves_limits_of_shape_subsingleton (J : Type v) [small_category J] (F : C ⥤ D) :
subsingleton (preserves_limits_of_shape J F) :=
by split; intros; funext; apply subsingleton.elim
instance preserves_colimits_of_shape_subsingleton (J : Type v) [small_category J] (F : C ⥤ D) :
subsingleton (preserves_colimits_of_shape J F) :=
by split; intros; funext; apply subsingleton.elim
instance preserves_limits_subsingleton (F : C ⥤ D) : subsingleton (preserves_limits F) :=
by split; intros; funext; resetI; apply subsingleton.elim
instance preserves_colimits_subsingleton (F : C ⥤ D) : subsingleton (preserves_colimits F) :=
by split; intros; funext; resetI; apply subsingleton.elim
instance preserves_limit_of_preserves_limits_of_shape (F : C ⥤ D)
[H : preserves_limits_of_shape J F] : preserves_limit K F :=
H
instance preserves_colimit_of_preserves_colimits_of_shape (F : C ⥤ D)
[H : preserves_colimits_of_shape J F] : preserves_colimit K F :=
H
instance preserves_limits_of_shape_of_preserves_limits (F : C ⥤ D)
[H : preserves_limits F] : preserves_limits_of_shape J F :=
@H J _
instance preserves_colimits_of_shape_of_preserves_colimits (F : C ⥤ D)
[H : preserves_colimits F] : preserves_colimits_of_shape J F :=
@H J _
instance id_preserves_limits : preserves_limits (functor.id C) :=
λ J 𝒥 K, by exactI ⟨λ c h,
⟨λ s, h.lift ⟨s.X, λ j, s.π.app j, λ j j' f, s.π.naturality f⟩,
by cases K; rcases c with ⟨_, _, _⟩; intros s j; cases s; exact h.fac _ j,
by cases K; rcases c with ⟨_, _, _⟩; intros s m w; rcases s with ⟨_, _, _⟩; exact h.uniq _ m w⟩⟩
instance id_preserves_colimits : preserves_colimits (functor.id C) :=
λ J 𝒥 K, by exactI ⟨λ c h,
⟨λ s, h.desc ⟨s.X, λ j, s.ι.app j, λ j j' f, s.ι.naturality f⟩,
by cases K; rcases c with ⟨_, _, _⟩; intros s j; cases s; exact h.fac _ j,
by cases K; rcases c with ⟨_, _, _⟩; intros s m w; rcases s with ⟨_, _, _⟩; exact h.uniq _ m w⟩⟩
section
variables {E : Type u₃} [ℰ : category.{u₃ v} E]
variables (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
local attribute [elab_simple] preserves_limit.preserves preserves_colimit.preserves
instance comp_preserves_limit [preserves_limit K F] [preserves_limit (K ⋙ F) G] :
preserves_limit K (F ⋙ G) :=
⟨λ c h, preserves_limit.preserves G (preserves_limit.preserves F h)⟩
instance comp_preserves_colimit [preserves_colimit K F] [preserves_colimit (K ⋙ F) G] :
preserves_colimit K (F ⋙ G) :=
⟨λ c h, preserves_colimit.preserves G (preserves_colimit.preserves F h)⟩
end
/-- If F preserves one limit cone for the diagram K,
then it preserves any limit cone for K. -/
def preserves_limit_of_preserves_limit_cone {F : C ⥤ D} {t : cone K}
(h : is_limit t) (hF : is_limit (F.map_cone t)) : preserves_limit K F :=
⟨λ t' h', is_limit.of_iso_limit hF (functor.on_iso _ (is_limit.unique h h'))⟩
/-- If F preserves one colimit cocone for the diagram K,
then it preserves any colimit cocone for K. -/
def preserves_colimit_of_preserves_colimit_cocone {F : C ⥤ D} {t : cocone K}
(h : is_colimit t) (hF : is_colimit (F.map_cocone t)) : preserves_colimit K F :=
⟨λ t' h', is_colimit.of_iso_colimit hF (functor.on_iso _ (is_colimit.unique h h'))⟩
/-
A functor F : C → D reflects limits if whenever the image of a cone
under F is a limit cone in D, the cone was already a limit cone in C.
Note that again we do not assume a priori that D actually has any
limits.
-/
class reflects_limit (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v) :=
(reflects : Π {c : cone K}, is_limit (F.map_cone c) → is_limit c)
class reflects_colimit (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v) :=
(reflects : Π {c : cocone K}, is_colimit (F.map_cocone c) → is_colimit c)
@[class] def reflects_limits_of_shape (J : Type v) [small_category J] (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v) :=
Π {K : J ⥤ C}, reflects_limit K F
@[class] def reflects_colimits_of_shape (J : Type v) [small_category J] (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v) :=
Π {K : J ⥤ C}, reflects_colimit K F
@[class] def reflects_limits (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ (v+1)) :=
Π {J : Type v} {𝒥 : small_category J}, by exactI reflects_limits_of_shape J F
@[class] def reflects_colimits (F : C ⥤ D) : Type (max u₁ u₂ (v+1)) :=
Π {J : Type v} {𝒥 : small_category J}, by exactI reflects_colimits_of_shape J F
instance reflects_limit_subsingleton (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D) : subsingleton (reflects_limit K F) :=
by split; rintros ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩; congr
instance reflects_colimit_subsingleton (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D) : subsingleton (reflects_colimit K F) :=
by split; rintros ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩; congr
instance reflects_limits_of_shape_subsingleton (J : Type v) [small_category J] (F : C ⥤ D) :
subsingleton (reflects_limits_of_shape J F) :=
by split; intros; funext; apply subsingleton.elim
instance reflects_colimits_of_shape_subsingleton (J : Type v) [small_category J] (F : C ⥤ D) :
subsingleton (reflects_colimits_of_shape J F) :=
by split; intros; funext; apply subsingleton.elim
instance reflects_limits_subsingleton (F : C ⥤ D) : subsingleton (reflects_limits F) :=
by split; intros; funext; resetI; apply subsingleton.elim
instance reflects_colimits_subsingleton (F : C ⥤ D) : subsingleton (reflects_colimits F) :=
by split; intros; funext; resetI; apply subsingleton.elim
instance reflects_limit_of_reflects_limits_of_shape (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D)
[H : reflects_limits_of_shape J F] : reflects_limit K F :=
H
instance reflects_colimit_of_reflects_colimits_of_shape (K : J ⥤ C) (F : C ⥤ D)
[H : reflects_colimits_of_shape J F] : reflects_colimit K F :=
H
instance reflects_limits_of_shape_of_reflects_limits (F : C ⥤ D)
[H : reflects_limits F] : reflects_limits_of_shape J F :=
@H J _
instance reflects_colimits_of_shape_of_reflects_colimits (F : C ⥤ D)
[H : reflects_colimits F] : reflects_colimits_of_shape J F :=
@H J _
instance id_reflects_limits : reflects_limits (functor.id C) :=
λ J 𝒥 K, by exactI ⟨λ c h,
⟨λ s, h.lift ⟨s.X, λ j, s.π.app j, λ j j' f, s.π.naturality f⟩,
by cases K; rcases c with ⟨_, _, _⟩; intros s j; cases s; exact h.fac _ j,
by cases K; rcases c with ⟨_, _, _⟩; intros s m w; rcases s with ⟨_, _, _⟩; exact h.uniq _ m w⟩⟩
instance id_reflects_colimits : reflects_colimits (functor.id C) :=
λ J 𝒥 K, by exactI ⟨λ c h,
⟨λ s, h.desc ⟨s.X, λ j, s.ι.app j, λ j j' f, s.ι.naturality f⟩,
by cases K; rcases c with ⟨_, _, _⟩; intros s j; cases s; exact h.fac _ j,
by cases K; rcases c with ⟨_, _, _⟩; intros s m w; rcases s with ⟨_, _, _⟩; exact h.uniq _ m w⟩⟩
section
variables {E : Type u₃} [ℰ : category.{u₃ v} E]
variables (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
instance comp_reflects_limit [reflects_limit K F] [reflects_limit (K ⋙ F) G] :
reflects_limit K (F ⋙ G) :=
⟨λ c h, reflects_limit.reflects (reflects_limit.reflects h)⟩
instance comp_reflects_colimit [reflects_colimit K F] [reflects_colimit (K ⋙ F) G] :
reflects_colimit K (F ⋙ G) :=
⟨λ c h, reflects_colimit.reflects (reflects_colimit.reflects h)⟩
end
end category_theory.limits
|
55f31a9165d884d559b1e4b158ba87ae768a8704 | 271e26e338b0c14544a889c31c30b39c989f2e0f | /stage0/src/Init/Lean/Data/Format.lean | 319a8b5bd951f314bf52b6a37b4d27f23b75f83f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dgorokho/lean4 | 805f99b0b60c545b64ac34ab8237a8504f89d7d4 | e949a052bad59b1c7b54a82d24d516a656487d8a | refs/heads/master | 1,607,061,363,851 | 1,578,006,086,000 | 1,578,006,086,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,696 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array
import Init.Lean.Data.Options
universes u v
namespace Lean
inductive Format
| nil : Format
| line : Format
| text : String → Format
| nest : Nat → Format → Format
| compose : Bool → Format → Format → Format
| choice : Format → Format → Format
namespace Format
@[export lean_format_append]
protected def append (a b : Format) : Format :=
compose false a b
instance : HasAppend Format := ⟨Format.append⟩
instance : HasCoe String Format := ⟨text⟩
instance : Inhabited Format := ⟨nil⟩
def join (xs : List Format) : Format :=
xs.foldl HasAppend.append ""
def isNil : Format → Bool
| nil => true
| _ => false
def flatten : Format → Format
| nil => nil
| line => text " "
| f@(text _) => f
| nest _ f => flatten f
| choice f _ => flatten f
| f@(compose true _ _) => f
| f@(compose false f₁ f₂) => compose true (flatten f₁) (flatten f₂)
@[export lean_format_group]
def group : Format → Format
| nil => nil
| f@(text _) => f
| f@(compose true _ _) => f
| f => choice (flatten f) f
structure SpaceResult :=
(found := false)
(exceeded := false)
(space := 0)
@[inline] private def merge (w : Nat) (r₁ : SpaceResult) (r₂ : Thunk SpaceResult) : SpaceResult :=
if r₁.exceeded || r₁.found then r₁
else
let y := r₂.get;
if y.exceeded || y.found then y
else
let newSpace := r₁.space + y.space;
{ space := newSpace, exceeded := newSpace > w }
def spaceUptoLine : Format → Nat → SpaceResult
| nil, w => {}
| line, w => { found := true }
| text s, w => { space := s.length, exceeded := s.length > w }
| compose _ f₁ f₂, w => merge w (spaceUptoLine f₁ w) (spaceUptoLine f₂ w)
| nest _ f, w => spaceUptoLine f w
| choice f₁ f₂, w => spaceUptoLine f₂ w
def spaceUptoLine' : List (Nat × Format) → Nat → SpaceResult
| [], w => {}
| p::ps, w => merge w (spaceUptoLine p.2 w) (spaceUptoLine' ps w)
partial def be : Nat → Nat → String → List (Nat × Format) → String
| w, k, out, [] => out
| w, k, out, (i, nil)::z => be w k out z
| w, k, out, (i, (compose _ f₁ f₂))::z => be w k out ((i, f₁)::(i, f₂)::z)
| w, k, out, (i, (nest n f))::z => be w k out ((i+n, f)::z)
| w, k, out, (i, text s)::z => be w (k + s.length) (out ++ s) z
| w, k, out, (i, line)::z => be w i ((out ++ "\n").pushn ' ' i) z
| w, k, out, (i, choice f₁ f₂)::z =>
let r := merge w (spaceUptoLine f₁ w) (spaceUptoLine' z w);
if r.exceeded then be w k out ((i, f₂)::z) else be w k out ((i, f₁)::z)
@[inline] def bracket (l : String) (f : Format) (r : String) : Format :=
group (nest l.length $ l ++ f ++ r)
@[inline] def paren (f : Format) : Format :=
bracket "(" f ")"
@[inline] def sbracket (f : Format) : Format :=
bracket "[" f "]"
def defIndent := 4
def defUnicode := true
def defWidth := 120
def getWidth (o : Options) : Nat := o.get `format.width defWidth
def getIndent (o : Options) : Nat := o.get `format.indent defIndent
def getUnicode (o : Options) : Bool := o.get `format.unicode defUnicode
@[init] def indentOption : IO Unit :=
registerOption `format.indent { defValue := defIndent, group := "format", descr := "indentation" }
@[init] def unicodeOption : IO Unit :=
registerOption `format.unicode { defValue := defUnicode, group := "format", descr := "unicode characters" }
@[init] def widthOption : IO Unit :=
registerOption `format.width { defValue := defWidth, group := "format", descr := "line width" }
@[export lean_format_pretty]
def prettyAux (f : Format) (w : Nat := defWidth) : String :=
be w 0 "" [(0, f)]
def pretty (f : Format) (o : Options := {}) : String :=
prettyAux f (getWidth o)
end Format
open Lean.Format
class HasFormat (α : Type u) :=
(format : α → Format)
export Lean.HasFormat (format)
def fmt {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] : α → Format :=
format
instance toStringToFormat {α : Type u} [HasToString α] : HasFormat α :=
⟨text ∘ toString⟩
-- note: must take precendence over the above instance to avoid premature formatting
instance formatHasFormat : HasFormat Format :=
⟨id⟩
instance stringHasFormat : HasFormat String := ⟨Format.text⟩
def Format.joinSep {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] : List α → Format → Format
| [], sep => nil
| [a], sep => format a
| a::as, sep => format a ++ sep ++ Format.joinSep as sep
def Format.prefixJoin {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] (pre : Format) : List α → Format
| [] => nil
| a::as => pre ++ format a ++ Format.prefixJoin as
def Format.joinSuffix {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] : List α → Format → Format
| [], suffix => nil
| a::as, suffix => format a ++ suffix ++ Format.joinSuffix as suffix
def List.format {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] : List α → Format
| [] => "[]"
| xs => sbracket $ Format.joinSep xs ("," ++ line)
instance listHasFormat {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] : HasFormat (List α) :=
⟨List.format⟩
instance arrayHasFormat {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] : HasFormat (Array α) :=
⟨fun a => "#" ++ fmt a.toList⟩
def Option.format {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] : Option α → Format
| none => "none"
| some a => "some " ++ fmt a
instance optionHasFormat {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] : HasFormat (Option α) :=
⟨Option.format⟩
instance prodHasFormat {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [HasFormat α] [HasFormat β] : HasFormat (Prod α β) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b⟩ => paren $ format a ++ "," ++ line ++ format b⟩
def Format.joinArraySep {α : Type u} [HasFormat α] (a : Array α) (sep : Format) : Format :=
a.iterate nil (fun i a r => if i.val > 0 then r ++ sep ++ format a else r ++ format a)
instance natHasFormat : HasFormat Nat := ⟨fun n => toString n⟩
instance uint16HasFormat : HasFormat UInt16 := ⟨fun n => toString n⟩
instance uint32HasFormat : HasFormat UInt32 := ⟨fun n => toString n⟩
instance uint64HasFormat : HasFormat UInt64 := ⟨fun n => toString n⟩
instance usizeHasFormat : HasFormat USize := ⟨fun n => toString n⟩
instance nameHasFormat : HasFormat Name := ⟨fun n => n.toString⟩
protected def Format.repr : Format → Format
| nil => "Format.nil"
| line => "Format.line"
| text s => paren $ "Format.text" ++ line ++ repr s
| nest n f => paren $ "Format.nest" ++ line ++ repr n ++ line ++ Format.repr f
| compose b f₁ f₂ => paren $ "Format.compose " ++ repr b ++ line ++ Format.repr f₁ ++ line ++ Format.repr f₂
| choice f₁ f₂ => paren $ "Format.choice" ++ line ++ Format.repr f₁ ++ line ++ Format.repr f₂
instance formatHasToString : HasToString Format := ⟨Format.pretty⟩
instance : HasRepr Format := ⟨Format.pretty ∘ Format.repr⟩
def formatDataValue : DataValue → Format
| DataValue.ofString v => format (repr v)
| DataValue.ofBool v => format v
| DataValue.ofName v => "`" ++ format v
| DataValue.ofNat v => format v
| DataValue.ofInt v => format v
instance dataValueHasFormat : HasFormat DataValue := ⟨formatDataValue⟩
def formatEntry : Name × DataValue → Format
| (n, v) => format n ++ " := " ++ format v
instance entryHasFormat : HasFormat (Name × DataValue) := ⟨formatEntry⟩
def formatKVMap (m : KVMap) : Format :=
sbracket (Format.joinSep m.entries ", ")
instance kvMapHasFormat : HasFormat KVMap := ⟨formatKVMap⟩
end Lean
|
1ff78a5b753f2ec580233af70889bc0ee714ef29 | a537b538f2bea3181e24409d8a52590603d1ddd9 | /test/tidy_problem.lean | 7fddb126d71e4908368adbdd1011ffe483ba205b | [] | no_license | rwbarton/lean-tidy | 6134813ded72b275d19d4d32514dba80c21708e3 | fe1125d32adb60decda7a77d0f679614ba9f6fbb | refs/heads/master | 1,585,549,718,705 | 1,538,120,619,000 | 1,538,120,624,000 | 150,864,330 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,538,225,790,000 | 1,538,225,790,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 544 | lean | import data.polynomial
-- compare the result when you uncomment this import -- error!
-- import tidy.tidy
class algebra (R : out_param $ Type*) [comm_ring R] (A : Type*) extends ring A :=
(f : R → A) [hom : is_ring_hom f]
(commutes : ∀ r s, s * f r = f r * s)
variables (R : Type*) [ring R]
instance ring.to_ℤ_algebra : algebra ℤ R :=
{ f := coe,
hom := by constructor; intros; simp,
commutes := λ n r, int.induction_on n (by simp)
(λ i ih, by simp [mul_add, add_mul, ih])
(λ i ih, by simp [mul_add, add_mul, ih]), }
|
4d3a29af8f52caa3df9a97eafd3f4cec55f76e91 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/data/int/cast.lean | c374c757600d31b2abe65de2e2dc61f5e3e3c908 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,814 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.int.basic
import data.nat.cast
open nat
namespace int
/- cast (injection into groups with one) -/
@[simp, push_cast] theorem nat_cast_eq_coe_nat : ∀ n,
@coe ℕ ℤ (@coe_to_lift _ _ nat.cast_coe) n =
@coe ℕ ℤ (@coe_to_lift _ _ (@coe_base _ _ int.has_coe)) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := congr_arg (+(1:ℤ)) (nat_cast_eq_coe_nat n)
/-- Coercion `ℕ → ℤ` as a `ring_hom`. -/
def of_nat_hom : ℕ →+* ℤ := ⟨coe, rfl, int.of_nat_mul, rfl, int.of_nat_add⟩
section cast
variables {α : Type*}
section
variables [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] [has_neg α]
/-- Canonical homomorphism from the integers to any ring(-like) structure `α` -/
protected def cast : ℤ → α
| (n : ℕ) := n
| -[1+ n] := -(n+1)
-- see Note [coercion into rings]
@[priority 900] instance cast_coe : has_coe_t ℤ α := ⟨int.cast⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℤ) : α) = 0 := rfl
theorem cast_of_nat (n : ℕ) : (of_nat n : α) = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := rfl
theorem cast_coe_nat' (n : ℕ) :
(@coe ℕ ℤ (@coe_to_lift _ _ nat.cast_coe) n : α) = n :=
by simp
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_neg_succ_of_nat (n : ℕ) : (-[1+ n] : α) = -(n + 1) := rfl
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_one [add_monoid α] [has_one α] [has_neg α] :
((1 : ℤ) : α) = 1 := nat.cast_one
@[simp] theorem cast_sub_nat_nat [add_group α] [has_one α] (m n) :
((int.sub_nat_nat m n : ℤ) : α) = m - n :=
begin
unfold sub_nat_nat, cases e : n - m,
{ simp [sub_nat_nat, e, nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero e] },
{ rw [sub_nat_nat, cast_neg_succ_of_nat, ← nat.cast_succ, ← e,
nat.cast_sub $ _root_.le_of_lt $ nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e, neg_sub] },
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_neg_of_nat [add_group α] [has_one α] :
∀ n, ((neg_of_nat n : ℤ) : α) = -n
| 0 := neg_zero.symm
| (n+1) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_add [add_group α] [has_one α] : ∀ m n, ((m + n : ℤ) : α) = m + n
| (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) := nat.cast_add _ _
| (m : ℕ) -[1+ n] := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using cast_sub_nat_nat _ _
| -[1+ m] (n : ℕ) := (cast_sub_nat_nat _ _).trans $ sub_eq_of_eq_add $
show (n:α) = -(m+1) + n + (m+1),
by rw [add_assoc, ← cast_succ, ← nat.cast_add, add_comm,
nat.cast_add, cast_succ, neg_add_cancel_left]
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := show -((m + n + 1 + 1 : ℕ) : α) = -(m + 1) + -(n + 1),
begin
rw [← neg_add_rev, ← nat.cast_add_one, ← nat.cast_add_one, ← nat.cast_add],
apply congr_arg (λ x:ℕ, -(x:α)),
ac_refl
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_neg [add_group α] [has_one α] : ∀ n, ((-n : ℤ) : α) = -n
| (n : ℕ) := cast_neg_of_nat _
| -[1+ n] := (neg_neg _).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_sub [add_group α] [has_one α] (m n) : ((m - n : ℤ) : α) = m - n :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_mul [ring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : ℤ) : α) = m * n
| (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) := nat.cast_mul _ _
| (m : ℕ) -[1+ n] := (cast_neg_of_nat _).trans $
show (-(m * (n + 1) : ℕ) : α) = m * -(n + 1),
by rw [nat.cast_mul, nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg]
| -[1+ m] (n : ℕ) := (cast_neg_of_nat _).trans $
show (-((m + 1) * n : ℕ) : α) = -(m + 1) * n,
by rw [nat.cast_mul, nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
| -[1+ m] -[1+ n] := show (((m + 1) * (n + 1) : ℕ) : α) = -(m + 1) * -(n + 1),
by rw [nat.cast_mul, nat.cast_add_one, nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_neg]
/-- `coe : ℤ → α` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
def cast_add_hom (α : Type*) [add_group α] [has_one α] : ℤ →+ α := ⟨coe, cast_zero, cast_add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_add_hom [add_group α] [has_one α] : ⇑(cast_add_hom α) = coe := rfl
/-- `coe : ℤ → α` as a `ring_hom`. -/
def cast_ring_hom (α : Type*) [ring α] : ℤ →+* α := ⟨coe, cast_one, cast_mul, cast_zero, cast_add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_cast_ring_hom [ring α] : ⇑(cast_ring_hom α) = coe := rfl
lemma cast_commute [ring α] (m : ℤ) (x : α) : commute ↑m x :=
int.cases_on m (λ n, n.cast_commute x) (λ n, ((n+1).cast_commute x).neg_left)
lemma cast_comm [ring α] (m : ℤ) (x : α) : (m : α) * x = x * m :=
(cast_commute m x).eq
lemma commute_cast [ring α] (x : α) (m : ℤ) : commute x m :=
(m.cast_commute x).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nat_bit0 (n : ℕ) : (↑(bit0 n) : ℤ) = bit0 ↑n := by {unfold bit0, simp}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nat_bit1 (n : ℕ) : (↑(bit1 n) : ℤ) = bit1 ↑n := by {unfold bit1, unfold bit0, simp}
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_bit0 [ring α] (n : ℤ) : ((bit0 n : ℤ) : α) = bit0 n := cast_add _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_bit1 [ring α] (n : ℤ) : ((bit1 n : ℤ) : α) = bit1 n :=
by rw [bit1, cast_add, cast_one, cast_bit0]; refl
lemma cast_two [ring α] : ((2 : ℤ) : α) = 2 := by simp
theorem cast_mono [ordered_ring α] : monotone (coe : ℤ → α) :=
begin
intros m n h,
rw ← sub_nonneg at h,
lift n - m to ℕ using h with k,
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← cast_sub, ← h_1, cast_coe_nat],
exact k.cast_nonneg
end
@[simp] theorem cast_nonneg [ordered_ring α] [nontrivial α] : ∀ {n : ℤ}, (0 : α) ≤ n ↔ 0 ≤ n
| (n : ℕ) := by simp
| -[1+ n] := have -(n:α) < 1, from lt_of_le_of_lt (by simp) zero_lt_one,
by simpa [(neg_succ_lt_zero n).not_le, ← sub_eq_add_neg, le_neg] using this.not_le
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_le [ordered_ring α] [nontrivial α] {m n : ℤ} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw [← sub_nonneg, ← cast_sub, cast_nonneg, sub_nonneg]
theorem cast_strict_mono [ordered_ring α] [nontrivial α] : strict_mono (coe : ℤ → α) :=
strict_mono_of_le_iff_le $ λ m n, cast_le.symm
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_lt [ordered_ring α] [nontrivial α] {m n : ℤ} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n :=
cast_strict_mono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp] theorem cast_nonpos [ordered_ring α] [nontrivial α] {n : ℤ} : (n : α) ≤ 0 ↔ n ≤ 0 :=
by rw [← cast_zero, cast_le]
@[simp] theorem cast_pos [ordered_ring α] [nontrivial α] {n : ℤ} : (0 : α) < n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
@[simp] theorem cast_lt_zero [ordered_ring α] [nontrivial α] {n : ℤ} : (n : α) < 0 ↔ n < 0 :=
by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_min [linear_ordered_ring α] {a b : ℤ} :
(↑(min a b) : α) = min a b :=
monotone.map_min cast_mono
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_max [linear_ordered_ring α] {a b : ℤ} :
(↑(max a b) : α) = max a b :=
monotone.map_max cast_mono
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_abs [linear_ordered_ring α] {q : ℤ} :
((abs q : ℤ) : α) = abs q :=
by simp [abs]
lemma coe_int_dvd [comm_ring α] (m n : ℤ) (h : m ∣ n) :
(m : α) ∣ (n : α) :=
ring_hom.map_dvd (int.cast_ring_hom α) h
end cast
end int
open int
namespace add_monoid_hom
variables {A : Type*}
/-- Two additive monoid homomorphisms `f`, `g` from `ℤ` to an additive monoid are equal
if `f 1 = g 1`. -/
@[ext] theorem ext_int [add_monoid A] {f g : ℤ →+ A} (h1 : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
have f.comp (int.of_nat_hom : ℕ →+ ℤ) = g.comp (int.of_nat_hom : ℕ →+ ℤ) := ext_nat h1,
have ∀ n : ℕ, f n = g n := ext_iff.1 this,
ext $ λ n, int.cases_on n this $ λ n, eq_on_neg (this $ n + 1)
variables [add_group A] [has_one A]
theorem eq_int_cast_hom (f : ℤ →+ A) (h1 : f 1 = 1) : f = int.cast_add_hom A :=
ext_int $ by simp [h1]
theorem eq_int_cast (f : ℤ →+ A) (h1 : f 1 = 1) : ∀ n : ℤ, f n = n :=
ext_iff.1 (f.eq_int_cast_hom h1)
end add_monoid_hom
namespace monoid_hom
variables {M : Type*} [monoid M]
open multiplicative
theorem ext_int {f g : multiplicative ℤ →* M}
(h1 : f (of_add 1) = g (of_add 1)) : f = g :=
begin
ext,
exact add_monoid_hom.ext_iff.1
(@add_monoid_hom.ext_int _ _ f.to_additive g.to_additive h1) _,
end
end monoid_hom
namespace ring_hom
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [ring α] [ring β]
@[simp] lemma eq_int_cast (f : ℤ →+* α) (n : ℤ) : f n = n :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.eq_int_cast f.map_one n
lemma eq_int_cast' (f : ℤ →+* α) : f = int.cast_ring_hom α :=
ring_hom.ext f.eq_int_cast
@[simp] lemma map_int_cast (f : α →+* β) (n : ℤ) : f n = n :=
(f.comp (int.cast_ring_hom α)).eq_int_cast n
lemma ext_int {R : Type*} [semiring R] (f g : ℤ →+* R) : f = g :=
coe_add_monoid_hom_injective $ add_monoid_hom.ext_int $ f.map_one.trans g.map_one.symm
instance int.subsingleton_ring_hom {R : Type*} [semiring R] : subsingleton (ℤ →+* R) :=
⟨ring_hom.ext_int⟩
end ring_hom
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem int.cast_id (n : ℤ) : ↑n = n :=
((ring_hom.id ℤ).eq_int_cast n).symm
|
9a51b7d64afb3022d32fdb0518f5137d4f40004a | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/ring_theory/polynomial/symmetric_auto.lean | d4208d7a9b4c7361a7367c3ccf66610790cebdfb | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,324 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.tactic.default
import Mathlib.data.mv_polynomial.rename
import Mathlib.data.mv_polynomial.comm_ring
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 u_2 u_4 u_3
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Symmetric Polynomials and Elementary Symmetric Polynomials
This file defines symmetric `mv_polynomial`s and elementary symmetric `mv_polynomial`s.
We also prove some basic facts about them.
## Main declarations
* `mv_polynomial.is_symmetric`
* `mv_polynomial.esymm`
## Notation
+ `esymm σ R n`, is the `n`th elementary symmetric polynomial in `mv_polynomial σ R`.
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R S : Type*` `[comm_semiring R]` `[comm_semiring S]` (the coefficients)
+ `r : R` elements of the coefficient ring
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `φ ψ : mv_polynomial σ R`
-/
namespace mv_polynomial
/-- A mv_polynomial φ is symmetric if it is invariant under
permutations of its variables by the `rename` operation -/
def is_symmetric {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] (φ : mv_polynomial σ R) :=
∀ (e : equiv.perm σ), coe_fn (rename ⇑e) φ = φ
namespace is_symmetric
@[simp] theorem C {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] (r : R) :
is_symmetric (coe_fn C r) :=
fun (e : equiv.perm σ) => rename_C (⇑e) r
@[simp] theorem zero {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] : is_symmetric 0 :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (is_symmetric 0)) (Eq.symm C_0))) (C 0)
@[simp] theorem one {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] : is_symmetric 1 :=
eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (is_symmetric 1)) (Eq.symm C_1))) (C 1)
theorem add {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] {φ : mv_polynomial σ R}
{ψ : mv_polynomial σ R} (hφ : is_symmetric φ) (hψ : is_symmetric ψ) : is_symmetric (φ + ψ) :=
sorry
theorem mul {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] {φ : mv_polynomial σ R}
{ψ : mv_polynomial σ R} (hφ : is_symmetric φ) (hψ : is_symmetric ψ) : is_symmetric (φ * ψ) :=
sorry
theorem smul {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_semiring R] {φ : mv_polynomial σ R} (r : R)
(hφ : is_symmetric φ) : is_symmetric (r • φ) :=
fun (e : equiv.perm σ) =>
eq.mpr
(id
(Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (coe_fn (rename ⇑e) (r • φ) = r • φ))
(alg_hom.map_smul (rename ⇑e) r φ)))
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (r • coe_fn (rename ⇑e) φ = r • φ)) (hφ e)))
(Eq.refl (r • φ)))
@[simp] theorem map {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} {S : Type u_4} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
{φ : mv_polynomial σ R} (hφ : is_symmetric φ) (f : R →+* S) : is_symmetric (coe_fn (map f) φ) :=
sorry
theorem neg {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_ring R] {φ : mv_polynomial σ R}
(hφ : is_symmetric φ) : is_symmetric (-φ) :=
fun (e : equiv.perm σ) =>
eq.mpr
(id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (coe_fn (rename ⇑e) (-φ) = -φ)) (alg_hom.map_neg (rename ⇑e) φ)))
(eq.mpr (id (Eq._oldrec (Eq.refl (-coe_fn (rename ⇑e) φ = -φ)) (hφ e))) (Eq.refl (-φ)))
theorem sub {σ : Type u_1} {R : Type u_2} [comm_ring R] {φ : mv_polynomial σ R}
{ψ : mv_polynomial σ R} (hφ : is_symmetric φ) (hψ : is_symmetric ψ) : is_symmetric (φ - ψ) :=
sorry
end is_symmetric
/-- The `n`th elementary symmetric `mv_polynomial σ R`. -/
def esymm (σ : Type u_1) (R : Type u_2) [comm_semiring R] [fintype σ] (n : ℕ) : mv_polynomial σ R :=
finset.sum (finset.powerset_len n finset.univ)
fun (t : finset σ) => finset.prod t fun (i : σ) => X i
/-- We can define `esymm σ R n` by summing over a subtype instead of over `powerset_len`. -/
theorem esymm_eq_sum_subtype (σ : Type u_1) (R : Type u_2) [comm_semiring R] [fintype σ] (n : ℕ) :
esymm σ R n =
finset.sum finset.univ
fun (t : Subtype fun (s : finset σ) => finset.card s = n) =>
finset.prod ↑t fun (i : σ) => X i :=
sorry
/-- We can define `esymm σ R n` as a sum over explicit monomials -/
theorem esymm_eq_sum_monomial (σ : Type u_1) (R : Type u_2) [comm_semiring R] [fintype σ] (n : ℕ) :
esymm σ R n =
finset.sum (finset.powerset_len n finset.univ)
fun (t : finset σ) => monomial (finset.sum t fun (i : σ) => finsupp.single i 1) 1 :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem esymm_zero (σ : Type u_1) (R : Type u_2) [comm_semiring R] [fintype σ] :
esymm σ R 0 = 1 :=
sorry
theorem map_esymm (σ : Type u_1) (R : Type u_2) {S : Type u_4} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
[fintype σ] (n : ℕ) (f : R →+* S) : coe_fn (map f) (esymm σ R n) = esymm σ S n :=
sorry
theorem rename_esymm (σ : Type u_1) (R : Type u_2) {τ : Type u_3} [comm_semiring R] [fintype σ]
[fintype τ] (n : ℕ) (e : σ ≃ τ) : coe_fn (rename ⇑e) (esymm σ R n) = esymm τ R n :=
sorry
theorem esymm_is_symmetric (σ : Type u_1) (R : Type u_2) [comm_semiring R] [fintype σ] (n : ℕ) :
is_symmetric (esymm σ R n) :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
60292e6a44e58dbe62b5981374ba0ef929052709 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/data/list/chain.lean | 001938e5223957bdd370381f86dd9cb772387bfa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,578 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.list.pairwise
import logic.relation
universes u v
open nat
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace list
/- chain relation (conjunction of R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c d ...) -/
mk_iff_of_inductive_prop list.chain list.chain_iff
variable {R : α → α → Prop}
theorem rel_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a (b::l)) : R a b :=
(chain_cons.1 p).1
theorem chain_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a (b::l)) : chain R b l :=
(chain_cons.1 p).2
theorem chain.imp' {S : α → α → Prop}
(HRS : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, R a b → S a b) {a b : α} (Hab : ∀ ⦃c⦄, R a c → S b c)
{l : list α} (p : chain R a l) : chain S b l :=
by induction p with _ a c l r p IH generalizing b; constructor;
[exact Hab r, exact IH (@HRS _)]
theorem chain.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {a : α} {l : list α} (p : chain R a l) : chain S a l :=
p.imp' H (H a)
theorem chain.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {a : α} {l : list α} : chain R a l ↔ chain S a l :=
⟨chain.imp (λ a b, (H a b).1), chain.imp (λ a b, (H a b).2)⟩
theorem chain.iff_mem {a : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a l ↔ chain (λ x y, x ∈ a :: l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) a l :=
⟨λ p, by induction p with _ a b l r p IH; constructor;
[exact ⟨mem_cons_self _ _, mem_cons_self _ _, r⟩,
exact IH.imp (λ a b ⟨am, bm, h⟩,
⟨mem_cons_of_mem _ am, mem_cons_of_mem _ bm, h⟩)],
chain.imp (λ a b h, h.2.2)⟩
theorem chain_singleton {a b : α} : chain R a [b] ↔ R a b :=
by simp only [chain_cons, chain.nil, and_true]
theorem chain_split {a b : α} {l₁ l₂ : list α} : chain R a (l₁++b::l₂) ↔
chain R a (l₁++[b]) ∧ chain R b l₂ :=
by induction l₁ with x l₁ IH generalizing a;
simp only [*, nil_append, cons_append, chain.nil, chain_cons, and_true, and_assoc]
theorem chain_map (f : β → α) {b : β} {l : list β} :
chain R (f b) (map f l) ↔ chain (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) b l :=
by induction l generalizing b; simp only [map, chain.nil, chain_cons, *]
theorem chain_of_chain_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain S (f a) (map f l)) : chain R a l :=
((chain_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem chain_map_of_chain {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {a : α} {l : list α}
(p : chain R a l) : chain S (f a) (map f l) :=
(chain_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem chain_of_pairwise {a : α} {l : list α} (p : pairwise R (a::l)) : chain R a l :=
begin
cases pairwise_cons.1 p with r p', clear p,
induction p' with b l r' p IH generalizing a, {exact chain.nil},
simp only [chain_cons, forall_mem_cons] at r,
exact chain_cons.2 ⟨r.1, IH r'⟩
end
theorem chain_iff_pairwise (tr : transitive R) {a : α} {l : list α} :
chain R a l ↔ pairwise R (a::l) :=
⟨λ c, begin
induction c with b b c l r p IH, {exact pairwise_singleton _ _},
apply IH.cons _, simp only [mem_cons_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, r, true_and],
show ∀ x ∈ l, R b x, from λ x m, (tr r (rel_of_pairwise_cons IH m)),
end, chain_of_pairwise⟩
theorem chain_iff_nth_le {R} : ∀ {a : α} {l : list α},
chain R a l ↔ (∀ h : 0 < length l, R a (nth_le l 0 h)) ∧ (∀ i (h : i < length l - 1),
R (nth_le l i (lt_of_lt_pred h)) (nth_le l (i+1) (lt_pred_iff.mp h)))
| a [] := by simp
| a (b :: t) :=
begin
rw [chain_cons, chain_iff_nth_le],
split,
{ rintros ⟨R, ⟨h0, h⟩⟩,
split,
{ intro w, exact R, },
{ intros i w,
cases i,
{ apply h0, },
{ convert h i _ using 1,
simp only [succ_eq_add_one, add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length, add_lt_add_iff_right] at w,
exact lt_pred_iff.mpr w, } } },
{ rintros ⟨h0, h⟩, split,
{ apply h0, simp, },
{ split,
{ apply h 0, },
{ intros i w, convert h (i+1) _,
exact lt_pred_iff.mp w, } } },
end
theorem chain'.imp {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {l : list α} (p : chain' R l) : chain' S l :=
by cases l; [trivial, exact p.imp H]
theorem chain'.iff {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {l : list α} : chain' R l ↔ chain' S l :=
⟨chain'.imp (λ a b, (H a b).1), chain'.imp (λ a b, (H a b).2)⟩
theorem chain'.iff_mem : ∀ {l : list α}, chain' R l ↔ chain' (λ x y, x ∈ l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) l
| [] := iff.rfl
| (x::l) :=
⟨λ h, (chain.iff_mem.1 h).imp $ λ a b ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩, ⟨h₁, or.inr h₂, h₃⟩,
chain'.imp $ λ a b h, h.2.2⟩
@[simp] theorem chain'_nil : chain' R [] := trivial
@[simp] theorem chain'_singleton (a : α) : chain' R [a] := chain.nil
theorem chain'_split {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, chain' R (l₁++a::l₂) ↔
chain' R (l₁++[a]) ∧ chain' R (a::l₂)
| [] l₂ := (and_iff_right (chain'_singleton a)).symm
| (b::l₁) l₂ := chain_split
theorem chain'_map (f : β → α) {l : list β} :
chain' R (map f l) ↔ chain' (λ a b : β, R (f a) (f b)) l :=
by cases l; [refl, exact chain_map _]
theorem chain'_of_chain'_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b) {l : list α}
(p : chain' S (map f l)) : chain' R l :=
((chain'_map f).1 p).imp H
theorem chain'_map_of_chain' {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β)
(H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b)) {l : list α}
(p : chain' R l) : chain' S (map f l) :=
(chain'_map f).2 $ p.imp H
theorem pairwise.chain' : ∀ {l : list α}, pairwise R l → chain' R l
| [] _ := trivial
| (a::l) h := chain_of_pairwise h
theorem chain'_iff_pairwise (tr : transitive R) : ∀ {l : list α},
chain' R l ↔ pairwise R l
| [] := (iff_true_intro pairwise.nil).symm
| (a::l) := chain_iff_pairwise tr
@[simp] theorem chain'_cons {x y l} : chain' R (x :: y :: l) ↔ R x y ∧ chain' R (y :: l) :=
chain_cons
theorem chain'.cons {x y l} (h₁ : R x y) (h₂ : chain' R (y :: l)) :
chain' R (x :: y :: l) :=
chain'_cons.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem chain'.tail : ∀ {l} (h : chain' R l), chain' R l.tail
| [] _ := trivial
| [x] _ := trivial
| (x :: y :: l) h := (chain'_cons.mp h).right
theorem chain'.rel_head {x y l} (h : chain' R (x :: y :: l)) : R x y :=
rel_of_chain_cons h
theorem chain'.rel_head' {x l} (h : chain' R (x :: l)) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ head' l) : R x y :=
by { rw ← cons_head'_tail hy at h, exact h.rel_head }
theorem chain'.cons' {x} :
∀ {l : list α}, chain' R l → (∀ y ∈ l.head', R x y) → chain' R (x :: l)
| [] _ _ := chain'_singleton x
| (a :: l) hl H := hl.cons $ H _ rfl
theorem chain'_cons' {x l} : chain' R (x :: l) ↔ (∀ y ∈ head' l, R x y) ∧ chain' R l :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.rel_head', h.tail⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂.cons' h₁⟩
theorem chain'.append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α} (h₁ : chain' R l₁) (h₂ : chain' R l₂)
(h : ∀ (x ∈ l₁.last') (y ∈ l₂.head'), R x y),
chain' R (l₁ ++ l₂)
| [] l₂ h₁ h₂ h := h₂
| [a] l₂ h₁ h₂ h := h₂.cons' $ h _ rfl
| (a::b::l) l₂ h₁ h₂ h :=
begin
simp only [last'] at h,
have : chain' R (b::l) := h₁.tail,
exact (this.append h₂ h).cons h₁.rel_head
end
theorem chain'_pair {x y} : chain' R [x, y] ↔ R x y :=
by simp only [chain'_singleton, chain'_cons, and_true]
theorem chain'.imp_head {x y} (h : ∀ {z}, R x z → R y z) {l} (hl : chain' R (x :: l)) :
chain' R (y :: l) :=
hl.tail.cons' $ λ z hz, h $ hl.rel_head' hz
theorem chain'_reverse : ∀ {l}, chain' R (reverse l) ↔ chain' (flip R) l
| [] := iff.rfl
| [a] := by simp only [chain'_singleton, reverse_singleton]
| (a :: b :: l) := by rw [chain'_cons, reverse_cons, reverse_cons, append_assoc, cons_append,
nil_append, chain'_split, ← reverse_cons, @chain'_reverse (b :: l), and_comm, chain'_pair, flip]
theorem chain'_iff_nth_le {R} : ∀ {l : list α},
chain' R l ↔ ∀ i (h : i < length l - 1),
R (nth_le l i (lt_of_lt_pred h)) (nth_le l (i+1) (lt_pred_iff.mp h))
| [] := by simp
| (a :: nil) := by simp
| (a :: b :: t) :=
begin
rw [chain'_cons, chain'_iff_nth_le],
split,
{ rintros ⟨R, h⟩ i w,
cases i,
{ exact R, },
{ convert h i _ using 1,
simp only [succ_eq_add_one, add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length, add_lt_add_iff_right] at w,
simpa using w, },
},
{ rintros h, split,
{ apply h 0, simp, },
{ intros i w, convert h (i+1) _,
simp only [add_zero, length, add_succ_sub_one] at w,
simpa using w, }
},
end
/-- If `l₁ l₂` and `l₃` are lists and `l₁ ++ l₂` and `l₂ ++ l₃` both satisfy
`chain' R`, then so does `l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃` provided `l₂ ≠ []` -/
lemma chain'.append_overlap : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list α}
(h₁ : chain' R (l₁ ++ l₂)) (h₂ : chain' R (l₂ ++ l₃)) (hn : l₂ ≠ []),
chain' R (l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃)
| [] l₂ l₃ h₁ h₂ hn := h₂
| l₁ [] l₃ h₁ h₂ hn := (hn rfl).elim
| [a] (b::l₂) l₃ h₁ h₂ hn := by { simp at *, tauto }
| (a::b::l₁) (c::l₂) l₃ h₁ h₂ hn := begin
simp only [cons_append, chain'_cons] at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
simp only [← cons_append] at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
exact ⟨h₁.1, chain'.append_overlap h₁.2 h₂ (cons_ne_nil _ _)⟩
end
/--
If `a` and `b` are related by the reflexive transitive closure of `r`,
then there is a `r`-chain starting from `a` and ending on `b`.
-/
lemma exists_chain_of_relation_refl_trans_gen {r : α → α → Prop} {a b : α} (h : relation.refl_trans_gen r a b) :
∃ l, chain r a l ∧ last (a :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = b :=
begin
apply relation.refl_trans_gen.head_induction_on h,
{ exact ⟨[], chain.nil, rfl⟩ },
{ intros c d e t ih,
obtain ⟨l, hl₁, hl₂⟩ := ih,
refine ⟨d :: l, chain.cons e hl₁, _⟩,
rwa last_cons_cons }
end
/--
Given a chain from `a` to `b`, and a predicate true at `b`, if `r x y → p y → p x` then
the predicate is true at `a`.
That is, we can propagate the predicate up the chain.
-/
lemma chain.induction {r : α → α → Prop} (p : α → Prop) {a b : α}
(l : list α) (h : chain r a l)
(hb : last (a :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = b)
(carries : ∀ {x y : α}, r x y → p y → p x) (final : p b) : p a :=
begin
induction l generalizing a,
{ cases hb, exact final },
{ rw chain_cons at h,
apply carries h.1 (l_ih h.2 hb) }
end
end list
|
36ed6d1b52a6e3a664003452d0ffbbdcdaaedd4c | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/analysis/calculus/inverse.lean | 4ad72731d6915251cee81de88d58434d9a7221c5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,690 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov.
-/
import analysis.calculus.deriv
import topology.local_homeomorph
import topology.metric_space.contracting
/-!
# Inverse function theorem
In this file we prove the inverse function theorem. It says that if a map `f : E → F`
has an invertible strict derivative `f'` at `a`, then it is locally invertible,
and the inverse function has derivative `f' ⁻¹`.
We define `has_strict_deriv_at.to_local_homeomorph` that repacks a function `f`
with a `hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' a`, `f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F`, into a `local_homeomorph`.
The `to_fun` of this `local_homeomorph` is `defeq` to `f`, so one can apply theorems
about `local_homeomorph` to `hf.to_local_homeomorph f`, and get statements about `f`.
Then we define `has_strict_fderiv_at.local_inverse` to be the `inv_fun` of this `local_homeomorph`,
and prove two versions of the inverse function theorem:
* `has_strict_fderiv_at.to_local_inverse`: if `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in the
strict sense (`hf`), then `hf.local_inverse f f' a` has derivative `f'.symm` at `f a` in the
strict sense;
* `has_strict_fderiv_at.to_local_left_inverse`: if `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in
the strict sense and `g` is locally left inverse to `f` near `a`, then `g` has derivative
`f'.symm` at `f a` in the strict sense.
In the one-dimensional case we reformulate these theorems in terms of `has_strict_deriv_at` and
`f'⁻¹`. Some other versions of the theorem assuming that we already know the inverse function are
formulated in `fderiv.lean` and `deriv.lean`
## Notations
In the section about `approximates_linear_on` we introduce some `local notation` to make formulas
shorter:
* by `N` we denote `∥f'⁻¹∥`;
* by `g` we denote the auxiliary contracting map `x ↦ x + f'.symm (y - f x)` used to prove that
`{x | f x = y}` is nonempty.
## Tags
derivative, strictly differentiable, inverse function
-/
open function set filter metric
open_locale topological_space classical nnreal
noncomputable theory
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
variables {F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
variables {G : Type*} [normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
variables {G' : Type*} [normed_group G'] [normed_space 𝕜 G']
open asymptotics filter metric set
open continuous_linear_map (id)
/-!
### Non-linear maps approximating close to affine maps
In this section we study a map `f` such that `∥f x - f y - f' (x - y)∥ ≤ c * ∥x - y∥` on an open set
`s`, where `f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F` is a continuous linear equivalence and `c < ∥f'⁻¹∥`. Maps of this type
behave like `f a + f' (x - a)` near each `a ∈ s`.
If `E` is a complete space, we prove that the image `f '' s` is open, and `f` is a homeomorphism
between `s` and `f '' s`. More precisely, we define `approximates_linear_on.to_local_homeomorph` to
be a `local_homeomorph` with `to_fun = f`, `source = s`, and `target = f '' s`.
Maps of this type naturally appear in the proof of the inverse function theorem (see next section),
and `approximates_linear_on.to_local_homeomorph` will imply that the locally inverse function
exists.
We define this auxiliary notion to split the proof of the inverse function theorem into small
lemmas. This approach makes it possible
- to prove a lower estimate on the size of the domain of the inverse function;
- to reuse parts of the proofs in the case if a function is not strictly differentiable. E.g., for a
function `f : E × F → G` with estimates on `f x y₁ - f x y₂` but not on `f x₁ y - f x₂ y`.
-/
/-- We say that `f` approximates a continuous linear map `f'` on `s` with constant `c`,
if `∥f x - f y - f' (x - y)∥ ≤ c * ∥x - y∥` whenever `x, y ∈ s`.
This predicate is defined to facilitate the splitting of the inverse function theorem into small
lemmas. Some of these lemmas can be useful, e.g., to prove that the inverse function is defined
on a specific set. -/
def approximates_linear_on (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : set E) (c : ℝ≥0) : Prop :=
∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ∥f x - f y - f' (x - y)∥ ≤ c * ∥x - y∥
namespace approximates_linear_on
variables [cs : complete_space E] {f : E → F}
/-! First we prove some properties of a function that `approximates_linear_on` a (not necessarily
invertible) continuous linear map. -/
section
variables {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {s t : set E} {c c' : ℝ≥0}
theorem mono_num (hc : c ≤ c') (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
approximates_linear_on f f' s c' :=
λ x hx y hy, le_trans (hf x hx y hy) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hc $ norm_nonneg _)
theorem mono_set (hst : s ⊆ t) (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' t c) :
approximates_linear_on f f' s c :=
λ x hx y hy, hf x (hst hx) y (hst hy)
lemma lipschitz_sub (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
lipschitz_with c (λ x : s, f x - f' x) :=
begin
refine lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul (λ x y, _),
rw [dist_eq_norm, subtype.dist_eq, dist_eq_norm],
convert hf x x.2 y y.2 using 2,
rw [f'.map_sub], abel
end
protected lemma lipschitz (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
lipschitz_with (nnnorm f' + c) (s.restrict f) :=
by simpa only [restrict_apply, add_sub_cancel'_right]
using (f'.lipschitz.restrict s).add hf.lipschitz_sub
protected lemma continuous (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
continuous (s.restrict f) :=
hf.lipschitz.continuous
protected lemma continuous_on (hf : approximates_linear_on f f' s c) :
continuous_on f s :=
continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2 hf.continuous
end
/-!
From now on we assume that `f` approximates an invertible continuous linear map `f : E ≃L[𝕜] F`.
We also assume that either `E = {0}`, or `c < ∥f'⁻¹∥⁻¹`. We use `N` as an abbreviation for `∥f'⁻¹∥`.
-/
variables {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {s : set E} {c : ℝ≥0}
local notation `N` := nnnorm (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)
protected lemma antilipschitz (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
antilipschitz_with (N⁻¹ - c)⁻¹ (s.restrict f) :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc,
{ haveI : subsingleton s := ⟨λ x y, subtype.eq $ @subsingleton.elim _ hE _ _⟩,
exact antilipschitz_with.of_subsingleton },
convert (f'.antilipschitz.restrict s).add_lipschitz_with hf.lipschitz_sub hc,
simp [restrict]
end
protected lemma injective (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
injective (s.restrict f) :=
(hf.antilipschitz hc).injective
protected lemma inj_on (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
inj_on f s :=
inj_on_iff_injective.2 $ hf.injective hc
/-- A map approximating a linear equivalence on a set defines a local equivalence on this set.
Should not be used outside of this file, because it is superseded by `to_local_homeomorph` below.
This is a first step towards the inverse function. -/
def to_local_equiv (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) : local_equiv E F :=
(hf.inj_on hc).to_local_equiv _ _
/-- The inverse function is continuous on `f '' s`. Use properties of `local_homeomorph` instead. -/
lemma inverse_continuous_on (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) :
continuous_on (hf.to_local_equiv hc).symm (f '' s) :=
begin
apply continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.2,
refine ((hf.antilipschitz hc).to_right_inv_on' _ (hf.to_local_equiv hc).right_inv').continuous,
exact (λ x hx, (hf.to_local_equiv hc).map_target hx)
end
/-!
Now we prove that `f '' s` is an open set. This follows from the fact that the restriction of `f`
on `s` is an open map. More precisely, we show that the image of a closed ball $$\bar B(a, ε) ⊆ s$$
under `f` includes the closed ball $$\bar B\left(f(a), \frac{ε}{∥{f'}⁻¹∥⁻¹-c}\right)$$.
In order to do this, we introduce an auxiliary map $$g_y(x) = x + {f'}⁻¹ (y - f x)$$. Provided that
$$∥y - f a∥ ≤ \frac{ε}{∥{f'}⁻¹∥⁻¹-c}$$, we prove that $$g_y$$ contracts in $$\bar B(a, ε)$$ and `f`
sends the fixed point of $$g_y$$ to `y`.
-/
section
variables (f f')
/-- Iterations of this map converge to `f⁻¹ y`. The formula is very similar to the one
used in Newton's method, but we use the same `f'.symm` for all `y` instead of evaluating
the derivative at each point along the orbit. -/
def inverse_approx_map (y : F) (x : E) : E := x + f'.symm (y - f x)
end
section inverse_approx_map
variables (y : F) {x x' : E} {ε : ℝ}
local notation `g` := inverse_approx_map f f' y
lemma inverse_approx_map_sub (x x' : E) : g x - g x' = (x - x') - f'.symm (f x - f x') :=
by { simp only [inverse_approx_map, f'.symm.map_sub], abel }
lemma inverse_approx_map_dist_self (x : E) :
dist (g x) x = dist (f'.symm $ f x) (f'.symm y) :=
by simp only [inverse_approx_map, dist_eq_norm, f'.symm.map_sub, add_sub_cancel', norm_sub_rev]
lemma inverse_approx_map_dist_self_le (x : E) :
dist (g x) x ≤ N * dist (f x) y :=
by { rw inverse_approx_map_dist_self, exact f'.symm.lipschitz.dist_le_mul (f x) y }
lemma inverse_approx_map_fixed_iff {x : E} :
g x = x ↔ f x = y :=
by rw [← dist_eq_zero, inverse_approx_map_dist_self, dist_eq_zero, f'.symm.injective.eq_iff]
lemma inverse_approx_map_contracts_on (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
{x x'} (hx : x ∈ s) (hx' : x' ∈ s) :
dist (g x) (g x') ≤ N * c * dist x x' :=
begin
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm, inverse_approx_map_sub, norm_sub_rev],
suffices : ∥f'.symm (f x - f x' - f' (x - x'))∥ ≤ N * (c * ∥x - x'∥),
by simpa only [f'.symm.map_sub, f'.symm_apply_apply, mul_assoc] using this,
exact (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).le_op_norm_of_le (hf x hx x' hx')
end
variable {y}
lemma inverse_approx_map_maps_to (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) {b : E} (hb : b ∈ s) (hε : closed_ball b ε ⊆ s)
(hy : y ∈ closed_ball (f b) ((N⁻¹ - c) * ε)) :
maps_to g (closed_ball b ε) (closed_ball b ε) :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc,
{ exactI λ x hx, subsingleton.elim x (g x) ▸ hx },
assume x hx,
simp only [mem_closed_ball] at hx hy ⊢,
rw [dist_comm] at hy,
calc dist (inverse_approx_map f f' y x) b ≤
dist (inverse_approx_map f f' y x) (inverse_approx_map f f' y b) +
dist (inverse_approx_map f f' y b) b : dist_triangle _ _ _
... ≤ N * c * dist x b + N * dist (f b) y :
add_le_add (hf.inverse_approx_map_contracts_on y (hε hx) hb)
(inverse_approx_map_dist_self_le _ _)
... ≤ N * c * ε + N * ((N⁻¹ - c) * ε) :
add_le_add (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx (mul_nonneg (nnreal.coe_nonneg _) c.coe_nonneg))
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hy (nnreal.coe_nonneg _))
... = N * (c + (N⁻¹ - c)) * ε : by simp only [mul_add, add_mul, mul_assoc]
... = ε : by { rw [add_sub_cancel'_right, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul],
exact ne_of_gt (inv_pos.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt c.coe_nonneg hc) }
end
end inverse_approx_map
include cs
variable {ε : ℝ}
theorem surj_on_closed_ball (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) {b : E} (ε0 : 0 ≤ ε) (hε : closed_ball b ε ⊆ s) :
surj_on f (closed_ball b ε) (closed_ball (f b) ((N⁻¹ - c) * ε)) :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc,
{ resetI,
haveI hF : subsingleton F := f'.symm.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.subsingleton,
intros y hy,
exact ⟨b, mem_closed_ball_self ε0, subsingleton.elim _ _⟩ },
intros y hy,
have : contracting_with (N * c) ((hf.inverse_approx_map_maps_to (or.inr hc)
(hε $ mem_closed_ball_self ε0) hε hy).restrict _ _ _),
{ split,
{ rwa [mul_comm, ← nnreal.lt_inv_iff_mul_lt],
exact ne_of_gt (inv_pos.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt c.coe_nonneg hc) },
{ exact lipschitz_with.of_dist_le_mul (λ x x', hf.inverse_approx_map_contracts_on
y (hε x.mem) (hε x'.mem)) } },
refine ⟨this.efixed_point' _ _ _ b (mem_closed_ball_self ε0) (edist_lt_top _ _), _, _⟩,
{ exact is_complete_of_is_closed is_closed_ball },
{ apply contracting_with.efixed_point_mem' },
{ exact (inverse_approx_map_fixed_iff y).1 (this.efixed_point_is_fixed_pt' _ _ _ _) }
end
section
variables (f s)
/-- Given a function `f` that approximates a linear equivalence on an open set `s`,
returns a local homeomorph with `to_fun = f` and `source = s`. -/
def to_local_homeomorph (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) : local_homeomorph E F :=
{ to_local_equiv := hf.to_local_equiv hc,
open_source := hs,
open_target :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc,
{ resetI,
haveI hF : subsingleton F := f'.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.symm.subsingleton,
apply is_open_discrete },
change is_open (f '' s),
simp only [is_open_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_basis_closed_ball.mem_iff, ball_image_iff] at hs ⊢,
intros x hx,
rcases hs x hx with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
refine ⟨(N⁻¹ - c) * ε, mul_pos (sub_pos.2 hc) ε0, _⟩,
exact (hf.surj_on_closed_ball (or.inr hc) (le_of_lt ε0) hε).mono hε (subset.refl _)
end,
continuous_to_fun := hf.continuous_on,
continuous_inv_fun := hf.inverse_continuous_on hc }
end
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_coe (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f s hc hs : E → F) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_source (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f s hc hs).source = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_target (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f s hc hs).target = f '' s := rfl
lemma closed_ball_subset_target (hf : approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s c)
(hc : subsingleton E ∨ c < N⁻¹) (hs : is_open s) {b : E} (ε0 : 0 ≤ ε) (hε : closed_ball b ε ⊆ s) :
closed_ball (f b) ((N⁻¹ - c) * ε) ⊆ (hf.to_local_homeomorph f s hc hs).target :=
(hf.surj_on_closed_ball hc ε0 hε).mono hε (subset.refl _)
end approximates_linear_on
/-!
### Inverse function theorem
Now we prove the inverse function theorem. Let `f : E → F` be a map defined on a complete vector
space `E`. Assume that `f` has an invertible derivative `f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F` at `a : E` in the strict
sense. Then `f` approximates `f'` in the sense of `approximates_linear_on` on an open neighborhood
of `a`, and we can apply `approximates_linear_on.to_local_homeomorph` to construct the inverse
function. -/
namespace has_strict_fderiv_at
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the strict sense and `c > 0`, then `f` approximates `f'`
with constant `c` on some neighborhood of `a`. -/
lemma approximates_deriv_on_nhds {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {a : E}
(hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' a) {c : ℝ≥0} (hc : subsingleton E ∨ 0 < c) :
∃ s ∈ 𝓝 a, approximates_linear_on f f' s c :=
begin
cases hc with hE hc,
{ refine ⟨univ, mem_nhds_sets is_open_univ trivial, λ x hx y hy, _⟩,
simp [@subsingleton.elim E hE x y] },
have := hf.def hc,
rw [nhds_prod_eq, filter.eventually, mem_prod_same_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨s, has, hs⟩,
exact ⟨s, has, λ x hx y hy, hs (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
end
variables [cs : complete_space E] {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {a : E}
lemma approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
∃ (s : set E) (hs : a ∈ s ∧ is_open s),
approximates_linear_on f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s ((nnnorm (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E))⁻¹ / 2) :=
begin
refine ((nhds_basis_opens a).exists_iff _).1 _,
exact (λ s t, approximates_linear_on.mono_set),
exact (hf.approximates_deriv_on_nhds $ f'.subsingleton_or_nnnorm_symm_pos.imp id $
λ hf', nnreal.half_pos $ nnreal.inv_pos.2 $ hf')
end
include cs
variable (f)
/-- Given a function with an invertible strict derivative at `a`, returns a `local_homeomorph`
with `to_fun = f` and `a ∈ source`. This is a part of the inverse function theorem.
The other part `has_strict_fderiv_at.to_local_inverse` states that the inverse function
of this `local_homeomorph` has derivative `f'.symm`. -/
def to_local_homeomorph (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) : local_homeomorph E F :=
approximates_linear_on.to_local_homeomorph f
(classical.some hf.approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds)
(classical.some_spec hf.approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds).snd
(f'.subsingleton_or_nnnorm_symm_pos.imp id $ λ hf', nnreal.half_lt_self $ ne_of_gt $
nnreal.inv_pos.2 $ hf')
(classical.some_spec hf.approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds).fst.2
variable {f}
@[simp] lemma to_local_homeomorph_coe (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f : E → F) = f := rfl
lemma mem_to_local_homeomorph_source (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
a ∈ (hf.to_local_homeomorph f).source :=
(classical.some_spec hf.approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds).fst.1
lemma image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
f a ∈ (hf.to_local_homeomorph f).target :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).map_source hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
variables (f f' a)
/-- Given a function `f` with an invertible derivative, returns a function that is locally inverse
to `f`. -/
def local_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) : F → E :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).symm
variables {f f' a}
lemma eventually_left_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, hf.local_inverse f f' a (f x) = x :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).eventually_left_inverse hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
lemma local_inverse_apply_image (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
hf.local_inverse f f' a (f a) = a :=
hf.eventually_left_inverse.self_of_nhds
lemma eventually_right_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (f a), f (hf.local_inverse f f' a y) = y :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).eventually_right_inverse' hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
lemma local_inverse_continuous_at (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
continuous_at (hf.local_inverse f f' a) (f a) :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).continuous_at_symm hf.image_mem_to_local_homeomorph_target
lemma local_inverse_tendsto (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
tendsto (hf.local_inverse f f' a) (𝓝 $ f a) (𝓝 a) :=
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).tendsto_symm hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
lemma local_inverse_unique (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) {g : F → E}
(hg : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, g (f x) = x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 (f a), g y = local_inverse f f' a hf y :=
eventually_eq_of_left_inv_of_right_inv hg hf.eventually_right_inverse $
(hf.to_local_homeomorph f).tendsto_symm hf.mem_to_local_homeomorph_source
/-- If `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of strict differentiability `(hf)`,
then the inverse function `hf.local_inverse f` has derivative `f'.symm` at `f a`. -/
theorem to_local_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (hf.local_inverse f f' a) (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) (f a) :=
begin
have : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (hf.local_inverse f f' a (f a)),
{ rwa hf.local_inverse_apply_image },
exact this.of_local_left_inverse hf.local_inverse_continuous_at hf.eventually_right_inverse
end
/-- If `f : E → F` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of strict differentiability
and `g (f x) = x` in a neighborhood of `a`, then `g` has derivative `f'.symm` at `f a`.
For a version assuming `f (g y) = y` and continuity of `g` at `f a` but not `[complete_space E]`
see `of_local_left_inverse`. -/
theorem to_local_left_inverse (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) {g : F → E}
(hg : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, g (f x) = x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) (f a) :=
hf.to_local_inverse.congr_of_mem_sets $ (hf.local_inverse_unique hg).mono $ λ _, eq.symm
end has_strict_fderiv_at
/-!
### Inverse function theorem, 1D case
In this case we prove a version of the inverse function theorem for maps `f : 𝕜 → 𝕜`.
We use `continuous_linear_equiv.units_equiv_aut` to translate `has_strict_deriv_at f f' a` and
`f' ≠ 0` into `has_strict_fderiv_at f (_ : 𝕜 ≃L[𝕜] 𝕜) a`.
-/
namespace has_strict_deriv_at
variables [cs : complete_space 𝕜] {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' a : 𝕜} (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' a)
(hf' : f' ≠ 0)
include cs
variables (f f' a)
/-- A function that is inverse to `f` near `a`. -/
@[reducible] def local_inverse : 𝕜 → 𝕜 :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv hf').local_inverse _ _ _
variables {f f' a}
theorem to_local_inverse : has_strict_deriv_at (hf.local_inverse f f' a hf') f'⁻¹ (f a) :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv hf').to_local_inverse
theorem to_local_left_inverse {g : 𝕜 → 𝕜} (hg : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, g (f x) = x) :
has_strict_deriv_at g f'⁻¹ (f a) :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at_equiv hf').to_local_left_inverse hg
end has_strict_deriv_at
|
62507017ac738d07d2d8ac5ca1ac471e580eeaf1 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/topology/metric_space/infsep.lean | 6d0a3bd0df2882255bb0360202d49183fbd742f8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,276 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Wrenna Robson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wrenna Robson
-/
import topology.metric_space.basic
/-!
# Infimum separation
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines the extended infimum separation of a set. This is approximately dual to the
diameter of a set, but where the extended diameter of a set is the supremum of the extended distance
between elements of the set, the extended infimum separation is the infimum of the (extended)
distance between *distinct* elements in the set.
We also define the infimum separation as the cast of the extended infimum separation to the reals.
This is the infimum of the distance between distinct elements of the set when in a pseudometric
space.
All lemmas and definitions are in the `set` namespace to give access to dot notation.
## Main definitions
* `set.einfsep`: Extended infimum separation of a set.
* `set.infsep`: Infimum separation of a set (when in a pseudometric space).
!-/
variables {α β : Type*}
namespace set
section einfsep
open_locale ennreal
open function
/-- The "extended infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def einfsep [has_edist α] (s : set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), edist x y
section has_edist
variables [has_edist α] {x y : α} {s t : set α}
lemma le_einfsep_iff {d} : d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), d ≤ edist x y :=
by simp_rw [einfsep, le_infi_iff]
theorem einfsep_zero :
s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C (hC : 0 < C), ∃ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), edist x y < C :=
by simp_rw [einfsep, ← bot_eq_zero, infi_eq_bot, infi_lt_iff]
theorem einfsep_pos :
0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C (hC : 0 < C), ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), C ≤ edist x y :=
by { rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, einfsep_zero], simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt] }
lemma einfsep_top : s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), edist x y = ∞ :=
by simp_rw [einfsep, infi_eq_top]
lemma einfsep_lt_top : s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ ∃ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), edist x y < ∞ :=
by simp_rw [einfsep, infi_lt_iff]
lemma einfsep_ne_top : s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), edist x y ≠ ∞ :=
by simp_rw [←lt_top_iff_ne_top, einfsep_lt_top]
lemma einfsep_lt_iff {d} : s.einfsep < d ↔ ∃ (x y ∈ s) (h : x ≠ y), edist x y < d :=
by simp_rw [einfsep, infi_lt_iff]
lemma nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (hs : s.einfsep < ∞) : s.nontrivial :=
by { rcases einfsep_lt_top.1 hs with ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy, _⟩, exact ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy⟩ }
lemma nontrivial_of_einfsep_ne_top (hs : s.einfsep ≠ ∞) : s.nontrivial :=
nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hs)
lemma subsingleton.einfsep (hs : s.subsingleton) : s.einfsep = ∞ :=
by { rw einfsep_top, exact λ _ hx _ hy hxy, (hxy $ hs hx hy).elim }
lemma le_einfsep_image_iff {d} {f : β → α} {s : set β} :
d ≤ einfsep (f '' s) ↔ ∀ x y ∈ s, f x ≠ f y → d ≤ edist (f x) (f y) :=
by simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, ball_image_iff]
lemma le_edist_of_le_einfsep {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hd : d ≤ s.einfsep) : d ≤ edist x y := le_einfsep_iff.1 hd x hx y hy hxy
lemma einfsep_le_edist_of_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) :
s.einfsep ≤ edist x y := le_edist_of_le_einfsep hx hy hxy le_rfl
lemma einfsep_le_of_mem_of_edist_le {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hxy' : edist x y ≤ d) : s.einfsep ≤ d := le_trans (einfsep_le_edist_of_mem hx hy hxy) hxy'
lemma le_einfsep {d} (h : ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), d ≤ edist x y) :
d ≤ s.einfsep := le_einfsep_iff.2 h
@[simp] lemma einfsep_empty : (∅ : set α).einfsep = ∞ := subsingleton_empty.einfsep
@[simp] lemma einfsep_singleton : ({x} : set α).einfsep = ∞ := subsingleton_singleton.einfsep
lemma einfsep_Union_mem_option {ι : Type*} (o : option ι) (s : ι → set α) :
(⋃ i ∈ o, s i).einfsep = ⨅ i ∈ o, (s i).einfsep := by cases o; simp
lemma einfsep_anti (hst : s ⊆ t) : t.einfsep ≤ s.einfsep :=
le_einfsep $ λ x hx y hy, einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (hst hx) (hst hy)
lemma einfsep_insert_le : (insert x s).einfsep ≤ ⨅ (y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), edist x y :=
begin
simp_rw le_infi_iff,
refine λ _ hy hxy, einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (mem_insert _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy) hxy
end
lemma le_einfsep_pair : edist x y ⊓ edist y x ≤ ({x, y} : set α).einfsep :=
begin
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, inf_le_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff],
rintros a (rfl | rfl) b (rfl | rfl) hab; finish
end
lemma einfsep_pair_le_left (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : set α).einfsep ≤ edist x y :=
einfsep_le_edist_of_mem (mem_insert _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _)) hxy
lemma einfsep_pair_le_right (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : set α).einfsep ≤ edist y x :=
by rw pair_comm; exact einfsep_pair_le_left hxy.symm
lemma einfsep_pair_eq_inf (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : set α).einfsep = (edist x y) ⊓ (edist y x) :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (einfsep_pair_le_left hxy) (einfsep_pair_le_right hxy)) le_einfsep_pair
lemma einfsep_eq_infi : s.einfsep = ⨅ d : s.off_diag, (uncurry edist) (d : α × α) :=
begin
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (λ _, _),
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, le_infi_iff, imp_forall_iff, set_coe.forall, subtype.coe_mk,
mem_off_diag, prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp]
end
lemma einfsep_of_fintype [decidable_eq α] [fintype s] :
s.einfsep = s.off_diag.to_finset.inf (uncurry edist) :=
begin
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (λ _, _),
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, imp_forall_iff, finset.le_inf_iff, mem_to_finset, mem_off_diag,
prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp]
end
lemma finite.einfsep (hs : s.finite) :
s.einfsep = hs.off_diag.to_finset.inf (uncurry edist) :=
begin
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (λ _, _),
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, imp_forall_iff, finset.le_inf_iff, finite.mem_to_finset, mem_off_diag,
prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp]
end
lemma finset.coe_einfsep [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} :
(s : set α).einfsep = s.off_diag.inf (uncurry edist) :=
by simp_rw [einfsep_of_fintype, ← finset.coe_off_diag, finset.to_finset_coe]
lemma nontrivial.einfsep_exists_of_finite [finite s] (hs : s.nontrivial) :
∃ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), s.einfsep = edist x y :=
begin
classical,
casesI nonempty_fintype s,
simp_rw einfsep_of_fintype,
rcases @finset.exists_mem_eq_inf _ _ _ _ (s.off_diag.to_finset) (by simpa) (uncurry edist)
with ⟨_, hxy, hed⟩,
simp_rw mem_to_finset at hxy,
refine ⟨w.fst, hxy.1, w.snd, hxy.2.1, hxy.2.2, hed⟩
end
lemma finite.einfsep_exists_of_nontrivial (hsf : s.finite) (hs : s.nontrivial) :
∃ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), s.einfsep = edist x y :=
by { letI := hsf.fintype, exact hs.einfsep_exists_of_finite }
end has_edist
section pseudo_emetric_space
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] {x y z : α} {s t : set α}
lemma einfsep_pair (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : set α).einfsep = edist x y :=
begin
nth_rewrite 0 [← min_self (edist x y)],
convert einfsep_pair_eq_inf hxy using 2,
rw edist_comm
end
lemma einfsep_insert :
einfsep (insert x s) = (⨅ (y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), edist x y) ⊓ (s.einfsep) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_min einfsep_insert_le (einfsep_anti (subset_insert _ _))) _,
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, inf_le_iff, mem_insert_iff],
rintros y (rfl | hy) z (rfl | hz) hyz,
{ exact false.elim (hyz rfl) },
{ exact or.inl (infi_le_of_le _ (infi₂_le hz hyz)) },
{ rw edist_comm, exact or.inl (infi_le_of_le _ (infi₂_le hy hyz.symm)) },
{ exact or.inr (einfsep_le_edist_of_mem hy hz hyz) }
end
lemma einfsep_triple (hxy : x ≠ y) (hyz : y ≠ z) (hxz : x ≠ z) :
einfsep ({x, y, z} : set α) = edist x y ⊓ edist x z ⊓ edist y z :=
by simp_rw [einfsep_insert, infi_insert, infi_singleton, einfsep_singleton,
inf_top_eq, cinfi_pos hxy, cinfi_pos hyz, cinfi_pos hxz]
lemma le_einfsep_pi_of_le {π : β → Type*} [fintype β] [∀ b, pseudo_emetric_space (π b)]
{s : Π (b : β), set (π b)} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ b, c ≤ einfsep (s b) ) :
c ≤ einfsep (set.pi univ s) :=
begin
refine le_einfsep (λ x hx y hy hxy, _),
rw mem_univ_pi at hx hy,
rcases function.ne_iff.mp hxy with ⟨i, hi⟩,
exact le_trans (le_einfsep_iff.1 (h i) _ (hx _) _ (hy _) hi) (edist_le_pi_edist _ _ i)
end
end pseudo_emetric_space
section pseudo_metric_space
variables [pseudo_metric_space α] {s : set α}
theorem subsingleton_of_einfsep_eq_top (hs : s.einfsep = ∞) : s.subsingleton :=
begin
rw einfsep_top at hs,
exact λ _ hx _ hy, of_not_not (λ hxy, edist_ne_top _ _ (hs _ hx _ hy hxy))
end
theorem einfsep_eq_top_iff : s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ s.subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_einfsep_eq_top, subsingleton.einfsep⟩
theorem nontrivial.einfsep_ne_top (hs : s.nontrivial) : s.einfsep ≠ ∞ :=
by { contrapose! hs, rw not_nontrivial_iff, exact subsingleton_of_einfsep_eq_top hs }
theorem nontrivial.einfsep_lt_top (hs : s.nontrivial) : s.einfsep < ∞ :=
by { rw lt_top_iff_ne_top, exact hs.einfsep_ne_top }
theorem einfsep_lt_top_iff : s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ s.nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top, nontrivial.einfsep_lt_top⟩
theorem einfsep_ne_top_iff : s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ s.nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_einfsep_ne_top, nontrivial.einfsep_ne_top⟩
lemma le_einfsep_of_forall_dist_le {d} (h : ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), d ≤ dist x y) :
ennreal.of_real d ≤ s.einfsep :=
le_einfsep $
λ x hx y hy hxy, (edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ennreal.of_real_le_of_real (h x hx y hy hxy)
end pseudo_metric_space
section emetric_space
variables [emetric_space α] {x y z : α} {s t : set α} {C : ℝ≥0∞} {sC : set ℝ≥0∞}
lemma einfsep_pos_of_finite [finite s] : 0 < s.einfsep :=
begin
casesI nonempty_fintype s,
by_cases hs : s.nontrivial,
{ rcases hs.einfsep_exists_of_finite with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy, hxy'⟩,
exact hxy'.symm ▸ edist_pos.2 hxy },
{ rw not_nontrivial_iff at hs,
exact hs.einfsep.symm ▸ with_top.zero_lt_top }
end
lemma relatively_discrete_of_finite [finite s] :
∃ C (hC : 0 < C), ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), C ≤ edist x y :=
by { rw ← einfsep_pos, exact einfsep_pos_of_finite }
lemma finite.einfsep_pos (hs : s.finite) : 0 < s.einfsep :=
by { letI := hs.fintype, exact einfsep_pos_of_finite }
lemma finite.relatively_discrete (hs : s.finite) :
∃ C (hC : 0 < C), ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), C ≤ edist x y :=
by { letI := hs.fintype, exact relatively_discrete_of_finite }
end emetric_space
end einfsep
section infsep
open_locale ennreal
open set function
/-- The "infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def infsep [has_edist α] (s : set α) : ℝ := ennreal.to_real (s.einfsep)
section has_edist
variables [has_edist α] {x y : α} {s : set α}
lemma infsep_zero : s.infsep = 0 ↔ s.einfsep = 0 ∨ s.einfsep = ∞ :=
by rw [infsep, ennreal.to_real_eq_zero_iff]
lemma infsep_nonneg : 0 ≤ s.infsep := ennreal.to_real_nonneg
lemma infsep_pos : 0 < s.infsep ↔ 0 < s.einfsep ∧ s.einfsep < ∞ :=
by simp_rw [infsep, ennreal.to_real_pos_iff]
lemma subsingleton.infsep_zero (hs : s.subsingleton) : s.infsep = 0 :=
by { rw [infsep_zero, hs.einfsep], right, refl }
lemma nontrivial_of_infsep_pos (hs : 0 < s.infsep) : s.nontrivial :=
by { contrapose hs, rw not_nontrivial_iff at hs, exact hs.infsep_zero ▸ lt_irrefl _ }
lemma infsep_empty : (∅ : set α).infsep = 0 :=
subsingleton_empty.infsep_zero
lemma infsep_singleton : ({x} : set α).infsep = 0 :=
subsingleton_singleton.infsep_zero
lemma infsep_pair_le_to_real_inf (hxy : x ≠ y) :
({x, y} : set α).infsep ≤ (edist x y ⊓ edist y x).to_real :=
by simp_rw [infsep, einfsep_pair_eq_inf hxy]
end has_edist
section pseudo_emetric_space
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] {x y : α} {s : set α}
lemma infsep_pair_eq_to_real : ({x, y} : set α).infsep = (edist x y).to_real :=
begin
by_cases hxy : x = y,
{ rw hxy, simp only [infsep_singleton, pair_eq_singleton, edist_self, ennreal.zero_to_real] },
{ rw [infsep, einfsep_pair hxy] }
end
end pseudo_emetric_space
section pseudo_metric_space
variables [pseudo_metric_space α] {x y z: α} {s t : set α}
lemma nontrivial.le_infsep_iff {d} (hs : s.nontrivial) :
d ≤ s.infsep ↔ ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), d ≤ dist x y :=
by simp_rw [infsep, ← ennreal.of_real_le_iff_le_to_real (hs.einfsep_ne_top), le_einfsep_iff,
edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff (dist_nonneg)]
lemma nontrivial.infsep_lt_iff {d} (hs : s.nontrivial) :
s.infsep < d ↔ ∃ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), dist x y < d :=
by { rw ← not_iff_not, push_neg, exact hs.le_infsep_iff }
lemma nontrivial.le_infsep {d} (hs : s.nontrivial) (h : ∀ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), d ≤ dist x y) :
d ≤ s.infsep := hs.le_infsep_iff.2 h
lemma le_edist_of_le_infsep {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s)
(hxy : x ≠ y) (hd : d ≤ s.infsep) : d ≤ dist x y :=
begin
by_cases hs : s.nontrivial,
{ exact hs.le_infsep_iff.1 hd x hx y hy hxy },
{ rw not_nontrivial_iff at hs,
rw hs.infsep_zero at hd,
exact le_trans hd dist_nonneg }
end
lemma infsep_le_dist_of_mem (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) : s.infsep ≤ dist x y :=
le_edist_of_le_infsep hx hy hxy le_rfl
lemma infsep_le_of_mem_of_edist_le {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hxy' : dist x y ≤ d) : s.infsep ≤ d := le_trans (infsep_le_dist_of_mem hx hy hxy) hxy'
lemma infsep_pair : ({x, y} : set α).infsep = dist x y :=
by { rw [infsep_pair_eq_to_real, edist_dist], exact ennreal.to_real_of_real (dist_nonneg) }
lemma infsep_triple (hxy : x ≠ y) (hyz : y ≠ z) (hxz : x ≠ z) :
({x, y, z} : set α).infsep = dist x y ⊓ dist x z ⊓ dist y z :=
by simp only [infsep, einfsep_triple hxy hyz hxz, ennreal.to_real_inf, edist_ne_top x y,
edist_ne_top x z, edist_ne_top y z, dist_edist, ne.def, inf_eq_top_iff,
and_self, not_false_iff]
lemma nontrivial.infsep_anti (hs : s.nontrivial) (hst : s ⊆ t) : t.infsep ≤ s.infsep :=
ennreal.to_real_mono hs.einfsep_ne_top (einfsep_anti hst)
lemma infsep_eq_infi [decidable s.nontrivial] :
s.infsep = if s.nontrivial then ⨅ d : s.off_diag, (uncurry dist) (d : α × α) else 0 :=
begin
split_ifs with hs,
{ have hb : bdd_below (uncurry dist '' s.off_diag),
{ refine ⟨0, λ d h, _⟩,
simp_rw [mem_image, prod.exists, uncurry_apply_pair] at h,
rcases h with ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩,
exact dist_nonneg },
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (λ _, _),
simp_rw [hs.le_infsep_iff, le_cinfi_set_iff (off_diag_nonempty.mpr hs) hb, imp_forall_iff,
mem_off_diag, prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp] },
{ exact ((not_nontrivial_iff).mp hs).infsep_zero }
end
lemma nontrivial.infsep_eq_infi (hs : s.nontrivial)
: s.infsep = ⨅ d : s.off_diag, (uncurry dist) (d : α × α) :=
by { classical, rw [infsep_eq_infi, if_pos hs] }
lemma infsep_of_fintype [decidable s.nontrivial] [decidable_eq α] [fintype s] :
s.infsep = if hs : s.nontrivial then s.off_diag.to_finset.inf' (by simpa) (uncurry dist) else 0 :=
begin
split_ifs with hs,
{ refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (λ _, _),
simp_rw [hs.le_infsep_iff, imp_forall_iff, finset.le_inf'_iff, mem_to_finset, mem_off_diag,
prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp] },
{ rw not_nontrivial_iff at hs, exact hs.infsep_zero }
end
lemma nontrivial.infsep_of_fintype [decidable_eq α] [fintype s] (hs : s.nontrivial) :
s.infsep = s.off_diag.to_finset.inf' (by simpa) (uncurry dist) :=
by { classical, rw [infsep_of_fintype, dif_pos hs] }
lemma finite.infsep [decidable s.nontrivial] (hsf : s.finite) :
s.infsep = if hs : s.nontrivial then hsf.off_diag.to_finset.inf' (by simpa) (uncurry dist)
else 0 :=
begin
split_ifs with hs,
{ refine eq_of_forall_le_iff (λ _, _),
simp_rw [hs.le_infsep_iff, imp_forall_iff, finset.le_inf'_iff, finite.mem_to_finset,
mem_off_diag, prod.forall, uncurry_apply_pair, and_imp] },
{ rw not_nontrivial_iff at hs, exact hs.infsep_zero }
end
lemma finite.infsep_of_nontrivial (hsf : s.finite) (hs : s.nontrivial) :
s.infsep = hsf.off_diag.to_finset.inf' (by simpa) (uncurry dist) :=
by { classical, simp_rw [hsf.infsep, dif_pos hs] }
lemma _root_.finset.coe_infsep [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) :
(s : set α).infsep = if hs : s.off_diag.nonempty then s.off_diag.inf' hs (uncurry dist)
else 0 :=
begin
have H : (s : set α).nontrivial ↔ s.off_diag.nonempty,
by rwa [← set.off_diag_nonempty, ← finset.coe_off_diag, finset.coe_nonempty],
split_ifs with hs,
{ simp_rw [(H.mpr hs).infsep_of_fintype, ← finset.coe_off_diag, finset.to_finset_coe] },
{ exact ((not_nontrivial_iff).mp (H.mp.mt hs)).infsep_zero }
end
lemma _root_.finset.coe_infsep_of_off_diag_nonempty [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α}
(hs : s.off_diag.nonempty) : (s : set α).infsep = s.off_diag.inf' hs (uncurry dist) :=
by rw [finset.coe_infsep, dif_pos hs]
lemma _root_.finset.coe_infsep_of_off_diag_empty [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α}
(hs : s.off_diag = ∅) : (s : set α).infsep = 0 :=
by { rw ← finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty at hs, rw [finset.coe_infsep, dif_neg hs] }
lemma nontrivial.infsep_exists_of_finite [finite s] (hs : s.nontrivial) :
∃ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), s.infsep = dist x y :=
begin
classical,
casesI nonempty_fintype s,
simp_rw hs.infsep_of_fintype,
rcases @finset.exists_mem_eq_inf' _ _ _ (s.off_diag.to_finset) (by simpa) (uncurry dist)
with ⟨_, hxy, hed⟩,
simp_rw mem_to_finset at hxy,
exact ⟨w.fst, hxy.1, w.snd, hxy.2.1, hxy.2.2, hed⟩
end
lemma finite.infsep_exists_of_nontrivial (hsf : s.finite) (hs : s.nontrivial) :
∃ (x y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y), s.infsep = dist x y :=
by { letI := hsf.fintype, exact hs.infsep_exists_of_finite }
end pseudo_metric_space
section metric_space
variables [metric_space α] {s : set α}
lemma infsep_zero_iff_subsingleton_of_finite [finite s] :
s.infsep = 0 ↔ s.subsingleton :=
begin
rw [infsep_zero, einfsep_eq_top_iff, or_iff_right_iff_imp],
exact λ H, (einfsep_pos_of_finite.ne' H).elim
end
lemma infsep_pos_iff_nontrivial_of_finite [finite s] :
0 < s.infsep ↔ s.nontrivial :=
begin
rw [infsep_pos, einfsep_lt_top_iff, and_iff_right_iff_imp],
exact λ _, einfsep_pos_of_finite
end
lemma finite.infsep_zero_iff_subsingleton (hs : s.finite) :
s.infsep = 0 ↔ s.subsingleton :=
by { letI := hs.fintype, exact infsep_zero_iff_subsingleton_of_finite }
lemma finite.infsep_pos_iff_nontrivial (hs : s.finite) :
0 < s.infsep ↔ s.nontrivial :=
by { letI := hs.fintype, exact infsep_pos_iff_nontrivial_of_finite }
lemma _root_.finset.infsep_zero_iff_subsingleton (s : finset α) :
(s : set α).infsep = 0 ↔ (s : set α).subsingleton := infsep_zero_iff_subsingleton_of_finite
lemma _root_.finset.infsep_pos_iff_nontrivial (s : finset α) :
0 < (s : set α).infsep ↔ (s : set α).nontrivial := infsep_pos_iff_nontrivial_of_finite
end metric_space
end infsep
end set
|
c90ce1089499f4ee1d34315a742b1967e9045b01 | 1abd1ed12aa68b375cdef28959f39531c6e95b84 | /src/topology/category/Top/open_nhds.lean | 8f67975ccb451da0ee5062d11b19428f029d4ebb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jumpy4/mathlib | d3829e75173012833e9f15ac16e481e17596de0f | af36f1a35f279f0e5b3c2a77647c6bf2cfd51a13 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,508,842,818 | 1,636,203,271,000 | 1,636,203,271,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,184 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import topology.category.Top.opens
import category_theory.filtered
/-!
# The category of open neighborhoods of a point
Given an object `X` of the category `Top` of topological spaces and a point `x : X`, this file
builds the type `open_nhds x` of open neighborhoods of `x` in `X` and endows it with the partial
order given by inclusion and the corresponding category structure (as a full subcategory of the
poset category `set X`). This is used in `topology.sheaves.stalks` to build the stalk of a sheaf
at `x` as a limit over `open_nhds x`.
## Main declarations
Besides `open_nhds`, the main constructions here are:
* `inclusion (x : X)`: the obvious functor `open_nhds x ⥤ opens X`
* `functor_nhds`: An open map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `open_nhds x ⥤ open_nhds (f x)`
* `adjunction_nhds`: An open map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an adjunction between `open_nhds x` and
`open_nhds (f x)`.
-/
open category_theory
open topological_space
open opposite
universe u
variables {X Y : Top.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
namespace topological_space
/-- The type of open neighbourhoods of a point `x` in a (bundled) topological space. -/
def open_nhds (x : X) := { U : opens X // x ∈ U }
namespace open_nhds
instance (x : X) : partial_order (open_nhds x) :=
{ le := λ U V, U.1 ≤ V.1,
le_refl := λ _, le_refl _,
le_trans := λ _ _ _, le_trans,
le_antisymm := λ _ _ i j, subtype.eq $ le_antisymm i j }
instance (x : X) : lattice (open_nhds x) :=
{ inf := λ U V, ⟨U.1 ⊓ V.1, ⟨U.2, V.2⟩⟩,
le_inf := λ U V W, @le_inf _ _ U.1.1 V.1.1 W.1.1,
inf_le_left := λ U V, @inf_le_left _ _ U.1.1 V.1.1,
inf_le_right := λ U V, @inf_le_right _ _ U.1.1 V.1.1,
sup := λ U V, ⟨U.1 ⊔ V.1, V.1.1.mem_union_left U.2⟩,
sup_le := λ U V W, @sup_le _ _ U.1.1 V.1.1 W.1.1,
le_sup_left := λ U V, @le_sup_left _ _ U.1.1 V.1.1,
le_sup_right := λ U V, @le_sup_right _ _ U.1.1 V.1.1,
..open_nhds.partial_order x }
instance (x : X) : order_top (open_nhds x) :=
{ top := ⟨⊤, trivial⟩,
le_top := λ U, @le_top _ _ U.1.1,
..open_nhds.partial_order x }
instance open_nhds_category (x : X) : category.{u} (open_nhds x) :=
by {unfold open_nhds, apply_instance}
instance opens_nhds_hom_has_coe_to_fun {x : X} {U V : open_nhds x} :
has_coe_to_fun (U ⟶ V) (λ _, U.1 → V.1) :=
⟨λ f x, ⟨x, f.le x.2⟩⟩
/--
The inclusion `U ⊓ V ⟶ U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
def inf_le_left {x : X} (U V : open_nhds x) : U ⊓ V ⟶ U :=
hom_of_le inf_le_left
/--
The inclusion `U ⊓ V ⟶ V` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
def inf_le_right {x : X} (U V : open_nhds x) : U ⊓ V ⟶ V :=
hom_of_le inf_le_right
/-- The inclusion functor from open neighbourhoods of `x`
to open sets in the ambient topological space. -/
def inclusion (x : X) : open_nhds x ⥤ opens X :=
full_subcategory_inclusion _
@[simp] lemma inclusion_obj (x : X) (U) (p) : (inclusion x).obj ⟨U,p⟩ = U := rfl
lemma open_embedding {x : X} (U : open_nhds x) : open_embedding (U.1.inclusion) :=
U.1.open_embedding
def map (x : X) : open_nhds (f x) ⥤ open_nhds x :=
{ obj := λ U, ⟨(opens.map f).obj U.1, by tidy⟩,
map := λ U V i, (opens.map f).map i }
@[simp] lemma map_obj (x : X) (U) (q) : (map f x).obj ⟨U, q⟩ = ⟨(opens.map f).obj U, by tidy⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_id_obj (x : X) (U) : (map (𝟙 X) x).obj U = U :=
by tidy
@[simp] lemma map_id_obj' (x : X) (U) (p) (q) : (map (𝟙 X) x).obj ⟨⟨U, p⟩, q⟩ = ⟨⟨U, p⟩, q⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma map_id_obj_unop (x : X) (U : (open_nhds x)ᵒᵖ) : (map (𝟙 X) x).obj (unop U) = unop U :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma op_map_id_obj (x : X) (U : (open_nhds x)ᵒᵖ) : (map (𝟙 X) x).op.obj U = U :=
by simp
/-- `opens.map f` and `open_nhds.map f` form a commuting square (up to natural isomorphism)
with the inclusion functors into `opens X`. -/
def inclusion_map_iso (x : X) : inclusion (f x) ⋙ opens.map f ≅ map f x ⋙ inclusion x :=
nat_iso.of_components
(λ U, begin split, exact 𝟙 _, exact 𝟙 _ end)
(by tidy)
@[simp] lemma inclusion_map_iso_hom (x : X) : (inclusion_map_iso f x).hom = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma inclusion_map_iso_inv (x : X) : (inclusion_map_iso f x).inv = 𝟙 _ := rfl
end open_nhds
end topological_space
namespace is_open_map
open topological_space
variables {f}
/--
An open map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `open_nhds x ⥤ open_nhds (f x)`.
-/
@[simps]
def functor_nhds (h : is_open_map f) (x : X) :
open_nhds x ⥤ open_nhds (f x) :=
{ obj := λ U, ⟨h.functor.obj U.1, ⟨x, U.2, rfl⟩⟩,
map := λ U V i, h.functor.map i }
/--
An open map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an adjunction between `open_nhds x` and `open_nhds (f x)`.
-/
def adjunction_nhds (h : is_open_map f) (x : X) :
is_open_map.functor_nhds h x ⊣ open_nhds.map f x :=
adjunction.mk_of_unit_counit
{ unit := { app := λ U, hom_of_le $ λ x hxU, ⟨x, hxU, rfl⟩ },
counit := { app := λ V, hom_of_le $ λ y ⟨x, hfxV, hxy⟩, hxy ▸ hfxV } }
end is_open_map
|
def8b649810fa6c3413825b7a11acce39b60c340 | 5756a081670ba9c1d1d3fca7bd47cb4e31beae66 | /Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Tactic/Mathlib/NormNum.lean | f986b79ef0db37acb07dfd5ee165e130f945aae4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathport | 2c9bdc8292168febf59799efdc5451dbf0450d4a | 13051f68064f7638970d39a8fecaede68ffbf9e1 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,841,364,079 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 379,357,010 | 27 | 10 | Apache-2.0 | 1,691,309,132,000 | 1,624,384,521,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,500 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Basic
import Mathport.Syntax.Translate.Tactic.Lean3
open Lean
namespace Mathport.Translate.Tactic
open Parser
-- # tactic.norm_num
@[tr_user_attr norm_num] def trNormNumAttr := tagAttr `norm_num
@[tr_tactic norm_num1] def trNormNum1 : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
`(tactic| norm_num1 $(← trLoc (← parse location))?)
@[tr_tactic norm_num] def trNormNum : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
let hs := (← trSimpArgs (← parse simpArgList)).asNonempty
let loc ← trLoc (← parse location)
`(tactic| norm_num $[[$hs,*]]? $(loc)?)
@[tr_tactic apply_normed] def trApplyNormed : TacM Syntax.Tactic := do
`(tactic| apply_normed $(← trExpr (← parse pExpr)))
@[tr_conv norm_num1] def trNormNum1Conv : TacM Syntax.Conv := `(conv| norm_num1)
@[tr_conv norm_num] def trNormNumConv : TacM Syntax.Conv := do
let hs := (← trSimpArgs (← parse simpArgList)).asNonempty
`(conv| norm_num $[[$hs,*]]?)
@[tr_user_cmd «#norm_num»] def trNormNumCmd : Parse1 Syntax.Command :=
parse1 (return (← onlyFlag, ← simpArgList,
(← (tk "with" *> ident*)?).getD #[], ← (tk ":")? *> pExpr))
fun (o, args, attrs, e) => do
let o := optTk o
let hs ← trSimpArgs args
let hs := (hs ++ attrs.map trSimpExt).asNonempty
`(command| #norm_num $[only%$o]? $[[$hs,*]]? $(← trExpr e))
|
150145f475a80f8a18c613a2b957f29743f4b328 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /stage0/src/Lean/Linter.lean | 1bd94951cb406fc8ce00604660ac5efcc5e2496d | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 117 | lean | import Lean.Linter.Util
import Lean.Linter.Builtin
import Lean.Linter.UnusedVariables
import Lean.Linter.MissingDocs
|
e1c772644f52a7a03c273ccc88c3274436e392f9 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebra/group/commute.lean | 34dd712e4b7dc46133c8cf20bb4776b424bf52c1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,641 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.group.semiconj
/-!
# Commuting pairs of elements in monoids
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/750
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
We define the predicate `commute a b := a * b = b * a` and provide some operations on terms `(h :
commute a b)`. E.g., if `a`, `b`, and c are elements of a semiring, and that `hb : commute a b` and
`hc : commute a c`. Then `hb.pow_left 5` proves `commute (a ^ 5) b` and `(hb.pow_right 2).add_right
(hb.mul_right hc)` proves `commute a (b ^ 2 + b * c)`.
Lean does not immediately recognise these terms as equations, so for rewriting we need syntax like
`rw [(hb.pow_left 5).eq]` rather than just `rw [hb.pow_left 5]`.
This file defines only a few operations (`mul_left`, `inv_right`, etc). Other operations
(`pow_right`, field inverse etc) are in the files that define corresponding notions.
## Implementation details
Most of the proofs come from the properties of `semiconj_by`.
-/
variables {G : Type*}
/-- Two elements commute if `a * b = b * a`. -/
@[to_additive add_commute "Two elements additively commute if `a + b = b + a`"]
def commute {S : Type*} [has_mul S] (a b : S) : Prop := semiconj_by a b b
namespace commute
section has_mul
variables {S : Type*} [has_mul S]
/-- Equality behind `commute a b`; useful for rewriting. -/
@[to_additive "Equality behind `add_commute a b`; useful for rewriting."]
protected lemma eq {a b : S} (h : commute a b) : a * b = b * a := h
/-- Any element commutes with itself. -/
@[refl, simp, to_additive "Any element commutes with itself."]
protected lemma refl (a : S) : commute a a := eq.refl (a * a)
/-- If `a` commutes with `b`, then `b` commutes with `a`. -/
@[symm, to_additive "If `a` commutes with `b`, then `b` commutes with `a`."]
protected lemma symm {a b : S} (h : commute a b) : commute b a := eq.symm h
@[to_additive] protected theorem semiconj_by {a b : S} (h : commute a b) : semiconj_by a b b := h
@[to_additive]
protected theorem symm_iff {a b : S} : commute a b ↔ commute b a :=
⟨commute.symm, commute.symm⟩
@[to_additive] instance : is_refl S commute := ⟨commute.refl⟩
-- This instance is useful for `finset.noncomm_prod`
@[to_additive] instance on_is_refl {f : G → S} : is_refl G (λ a b, commute (f a) (f b)) :=
⟨λ _, commute.refl _⟩
end has_mul
section semigroup
variables {S : Type*} [semigroup S] {a b c : S}
/-- If `a` commutes with both `b` and `c`, then it commutes with their product. -/
@[simp, to_additive "If `a` commutes with both `b` and `c`, then it commutes with their sum."]
lemma mul_right (hab : commute a b) (hac : commute a c) : commute a (b * c) := hab.mul_right hac
/-- If both `a` and `b` commute with `c`, then their product commutes with `c`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "If both `a` and `b` commute with `c`, then their product commutes with `c`."]
lemma mul_left (hac : commute a c) (hbc : commute b c) : commute (a * b) c := hac.mul_left hbc
@[to_additive] protected lemma right_comm (h : commute b c) (a : S) :
a * b * c = a * c * b :=
by simp only [mul_assoc, h.eq]
@[to_additive] protected lemma left_comm (h : commute a b) (c) :
a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) :=
by simp only [← mul_assoc, h.eq]
end semigroup
@[to_additive]
protected theorem all {S : Type*} [comm_semigroup S] (a b : S) : commute a b := mul_comm a b
section mul_one_class
variables {M : Type*} [mul_one_class M]
@[simp, to_additive] theorem one_right (a : M) : commute a 1 := semiconj_by.one_right a
@[simp, to_additive] theorem one_left (a : M) : commute 1 a := semiconj_by.one_left a
end mul_one_class
section monoid
variables {M : Type*} [monoid M] {a b : M} {u u₁ u₂ : Mˣ}
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem pow_right (h : commute a b) (n : ℕ) : commute a (b ^ n) := h.pow_right n
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem pow_left (h : commute a b) (n : ℕ) : commute (a ^ n) b := (h.symm.pow_right n).symm
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem pow_pow (h : commute a b) (m n : ℕ) : commute (a ^ m) (b ^ n) :=
(h.pow_left m).pow_right n
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem self_pow (a : M) (n : ℕ) : commute a (a ^ n) := (commute.refl a).pow_right n
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem pow_self (a : M) (n : ℕ) : commute (a ^ n) a := (commute.refl a).pow_left n
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem pow_pow_self (a : M) (m n : ℕ) : commute (a ^ m) (a ^ n) :=
(commute.refl a).pow_pow m n
@[to_additive succ_nsmul'] theorem _root_.pow_succ' (a : M) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n + 1) = a ^ n * a :=
(pow_succ a n).trans (self_pow _ _)
@[to_additive] theorem units_inv_right : commute a u → commute a ↑u⁻¹ :=
semiconj_by.units_inv_right
@[simp, to_additive] theorem units_inv_right_iff :
commute a ↑u⁻¹ ↔ commute a u :=
semiconj_by.units_inv_right_iff
@[to_additive] theorem units_inv_left : commute ↑u a → commute ↑u⁻¹ a :=
semiconj_by.units_inv_symm_left
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem units_inv_left_iff: commute ↑u⁻¹ a ↔ commute ↑u a :=
semiconj_by.units_inv_symm_left_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem units_coe : commute u₁ u₂ → commute (u₁ : M) u₂ := semiconj_by.units_coe
@[to_additive]
theorem units_of_coe : commute (u₁ : M) u₂ → commute u₁ u₂ := semiconj_by.units_of_coe
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem units_coe_iff : commute (u₁ : M) u₂ ↔ commute u₁ u₂ := semiconj_by.units_coe_iff
/-- If the product of two commuting elements is a unit, then the left multiplier is a unit. -/
@[to_additive "If the sum of two commuting elements is an additive unit, then the left summand is an
additive unit."]
def _root_.units.left_of_mul (u : Mˣ) (a b : M) (hu : a * b = u) (hc : commute a b) : Mˣ :=
{ val := a,
inv := b * ↑u⁻¹,
val_inv := by rw [← mul_assoc, hu, u.mul_inv],
inv_val := have commute a u, from hu ▸ (commute.refl _).mul_right hc,
by rw [← this.units_inv_right.right_comm, ← hc.eq, hu, u.mul_inv] }
/-- If the product of two commuting elements is a unit, then the right multiplier is a unit. -/
@[to_additive "If the sum of two commuting elements is an additive unit, then the right summand is
an additive unit."]
def _root_.units.right_of_mul (u : Mˣ) (a b : M) (hu : a * b = u) (hc : commute a b) : Mˣ :=
u.left_of_mul b a (hc.eq ▸ hu) hc.symm
@[to_additive] lemma is_unit_mul_iff (h : commute a b) :
is_unit (a * b) ↔ is_unit a ∧ is_unit b :=
⟨λ ⟨u, hu⟩, ⟨(u.left_of_mul a b hu.symm h).is_unit, (u.right_of_mul a b hu.symm h).is_unit⟩,
λ H, H.1.mul H.2⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma _root_.is_unit_mul_self_iff :
is_unit (a * a) ↔ is_unit a :=
(commute.refl a).is_unit_mul_iff.trans (and_self _)
end monoid
section division_monoid
variables [division_monoid G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive] lemma inv_inv : commute a b → commute a⁻¹ b⁻¹ := semiconj_by.inv_inv_symm
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma inv_inv_iff : commute a⁻¹ b⁻¹ ↔ commute a b := semiconj_by.inv_inv_symm_iff
end division_monoid
section group
variables [group G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_right : commute a b → commute a b⁻¹ := semiconj_by.inv_right
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem inv_right_iff : commute a b⁻¹ ↔ commute a b := semiconj_by.inv_right_iff
@[to_additive] theorem inv_left : commute a b → commute a⁻¹ b := semiconj_by.inv_symm_left
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem inv_left_iff : commute a⁻¹ b ↔ commute a b := semiconj_by.inv_symm_left_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h : commute a b) : a⁻¹ * b * a = b :=
by rw [h.inv_left.eq, inv_mul_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_assoc (h : commute a b) : a⁻¹ * (b * a) = b :=
by rw [← mul_assoc, h.inv_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h : commute a b) : a * b * a⁻¹ = b :=
by rw [h.eq, mul_inv_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_assoc (h : commute a b) : a * (b * a⁻¹) = b :=
by rw [← mul_assoc, h.mul_inv_cancel]
end group
end commute
section comm_group
variables [comm_group G] (a b : G)
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_inv_cancel_comm : a * b * a⁻¹ = b :=
(commute.all a b).mul_inv_cancel
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_inv_cancel_comm_assoc : a * (b * a⁻¹) = b :=
(commute.all a b).mul_inv_cancel_assoc
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_mul_cancel_comm : a⁻¹ * b * a = b :=
(commute.all a b).inv_mul_cancel
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_mul_cancel_comm_assoc : a⁻¹ * (b * a) = b :=
(commute.all a b).inv_mul_cancel_assoc
end comm_group
|
f2dd016e5ba26714a2aebd53900198b4b7ee8ecc | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /stage0/src/Lean/Declaration.lean | d01bc64e40f336ab7d09c62242057dfbc19a1d97 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,438 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Expr
namespace Lean
/--
Reducibility hints are used in the convertibility checker.
When trying to solve a constraint such a
(f ...) =?= (g ...)
where f and g are definitions, the checker has to decide which one will be unfolded.
If f (g) is opaque, then g (f) is unfolded if it is also not marked as opaque,
Else if f (g) is abbrev, then f (g) is unfolded if g (f) is also not marked as abbrev,
Else if f and g are regular, then we unfold the one with the biggest definitional height.
Otherwise both are unfolded.
The arguments of the `regular` Constructor are: the definitional height and the flag `selfOpt`.
The definitional height is by default computed by the kernel. It only takes into account
other regular definitions used in a definition. When creating declarations using meta-programming,
we can specify the definitional depth manually.
Remark: the hint only affects performance. None of the hints prevent the kernel from unfolding a
declaration during Type checking.
Remark: the ReducibilityHints are not related to the attributes: reducible/irrelevance/semireducible.
These attributes are used by the Elaborator. The ReducibilityHints are used by the kernel (and Elaborator).
Moreover, the ReducibilityHints cannot be changed after a declaration is added to the kernel. -/
inductive ReducibilityHints where
| opaque : ReducibilityHints
| «abbrev» : ReducibilityHints
| regular : UInt32 → ReducibilityHints
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_reducibility_hints_regular]
def mkReducibilityHintsRegularEx (h : UInt32) : ReducibilityHints :=
ReducibilityHints.regular h
@[export lean_reducibility_hints_get_height]
def ReducibilityHints.getHeightEx (h : ReducibilityHints) : UInt32 :=
match h with
| ReducibilityHints.regular h => h
| _ => 0
namespace ReducibilityHints
def lt : ReducibilityHints → ReducibilityHints → Bool
| «abbrev», «abbrev» => false
| «abbrev», _ => true
| regular d₁, regular d₂ => d₁ < d₂
| regular _, opaque => true
| _, _ => false
def isAbbrev : ReducibilityHints → Bool
| «abbrev» => true
| _ => false
def isRegular : ReducibilityHints → Bool
| regular .. => true
| _ => false
end ReducibilityHints
/-- Base structure for `AxiomVal`, `DefinitionVal`, `TheoremVal`, `InductiveVal`, `ConstructorVal`, `RecursorVal` and `QuotVal`. -/
structure ConstantVal where
name : Name
levelParams : List Name
type : Expr
deriving Inhabited
structure AxiomVal extends ConstantVal where
isUnsafe : Bool
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_axiom_val]
def mkAxiomValEx (name : Name) (levelParams : List Name) (type : Expr) (isUnsafe : Bool) : AxiomVal := {
name := name,
levelParams := levelParams,
type := type,
isUnsafe := isUnsafe
}
@[export lean_axiom_val_is_unsafe] def AxiomVal.isUnsafeEx (v : AxiomVal) : Bool :=
v.isUnsafe
inductive DefinitionSafety where
| «unsafe» | safe | «partial»
deriving Inhabited, BEq, Repr
structure DefinitionVal extends ConstantVal where
value : Expr
hints : ReducibilityHints
safety : DefinitionSafety
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_definition_val]
def mkDefinitionValEx (name : Name) (levelParams : List Name) (type : Expr) (val : Expr) (hints : ReducibilityHints) (safety : DefinitionSafety) : DefinitionVal := {
name := name,
levelParams := levelParams,
type := type,
value := val,
hints := hints,
safety := safety
}
@[export lean_definition_val_get_safety] def DefinitionVal.getSafetyEx (v : DefinitionVal) : DefinitionSafety :=
v.safety
structure TheoremVal extends ConstantVal where
value : Expr
deriving Inhabited
/- Value for an opaque constant declaration `constant x : t := e` -/
structure OpaqueVal extends ConstantVal where
value : Expr
isUnsafe : Bool
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_opaque_val]
def mkOpaqueValEx (name : Name) (levelParams : List Name) (type : Expr) (val : Expr) (isUnsafe : Bool) : OpaqueVal := {
name := name,
levelParams := levelParams,
type := type,
value := val,
isUnsafe := isUnsafe
}
@[export lean_opaque_val_is_unsafe] def OpaqueVal.isUnsafeEx (v : OpaqueVal) : Bool :=
v.isUnsafe
structure Constructor where
name : Name
type : Expr
deriving Inhabited
structure InductiveType where
name : Name
type : Expr
ctors : List Constructor
deriving Inhabited
/-- Declaration object that can be sent to the kernel. -/
inductive Declaration where
| axiomDecl (val : AxiomVal)
| defnDecl (val : DefinitionVal)
| thmDecl (val : TheoremVal)
| opaqueDecl (val : OpaqueVal)
| quotDecl
| mutualDefnDecl (defns : List DefinitionVal) -- All definitions must be marked as `unsafe` or `partial`
| inductDecl (lparams : List Name) (nparams : Nat) (types : List InductiveType) (isUnsafe : Bool)
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_inductive_decl]
def mkInductiveDeclEs (lparams : List Name) (nparams : Nat) (types : List InductiveType) (isUnsafe : Bool) : Declaration :=
Declaration.inductDecl lparams nparams types isUnsafe
@[export lean_is_unsafe_inductive_decl]
def Declaration.isUnsafeInductiveDeclEx : Declaration → Bool
| Declaration.inductDecl _ _ _ isUnsafe => isUnsafe
| _ => false
@[specialize] def Declaration.foldExprM {α} {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (d : Declaration) (f : α → Expr → m α) (a : α) : m α :=
match d with
| Declaration.quotDecl => pure a
| Declaration.axiomDecl { type := type, .. } => f a type
| Declaration.defnDecl { type := type, value := value, .. } => do let a ← f a type; f a value
| Declaration.opaqueDecl { type := type, value := value, .. } => do let a ← f a type; f a value
| Declaration.thmDecl { type := type, value := value, .. } => do let a ← f a type; f a value
| Declaration.mutualDefnDecl vals => vals.foldlM (fun a v => do let a ← f a v.type; f a v.value) a
| Declaration.inductDecl _ _ inductTypes _ =>
inductTypes.foldlM
(fun a inductType => do
let a ← f a inductType.type
inductType.ctors.foldlM (fun a ctor => f a ctor.type) a)
a
@[inline] def Declaration.forExprM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (d : Declaration) (f : Expr → m Unit) : m Unit :=
d.foldExprM (fun _ a => f a) ()
/-- The kernel compiles (mutual) inductive declarations (see `inductiveDecls`) into a set of
- `Declaration.inductDecl` (for each inductive datatype in the mutual Declaration),
- `Declaration.ctorDecl` (for each Constructor in the mutual Declaration),
- `Declaration.recDecl` (automatically generated recursors).
This data is used to implement iota-reduction efficiently and compile nested inductive
declarations.
A series of checks are performed by the kernel to check whether a `inductiveDecls`
is valid or not. -/
structure InductiveVal extends ConstantVal where
numParams : Nat -- Number of parameters
numIndices : Nat -- Number of indices
all : List Name -- List of all (including this one) inductive datatypes in the mutual declaration containing this one
ctors : List Name -- List of all constructors for this inductive datatype
isRec : Bool -- `true` Iff it is recursive
isUnsafe : Bool
isReflexive : Bool
isNested : Bool
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_inductive_val]
def mkInductiveValEx (name : Name) (levelParams : List Name) (type : Expr) (numParams numIndices : Nat)
(all ctors : List Name) (isRec isUnsafe isReflexive isNested : Bool) : InductiveVal := {
name := name
levelParams := levelParams
type := type
numParams := numParams
numIndices := numIndices
all := all
ctors := ctors
isRec := isRec
isUnsafe := isUnsafe
isReflexive := isReflexive
isNested := isNested
}
@[export lean_inductive_val_is_rec] def InductiveVal.isRecEx (v : InductiveVal) : Bool := v.isRec
@[export lean_inductive_val_is_unsafe] def InductiveVal.isUnsafeEx (v : InductiveVal) : Bool := v.isUnsafe
@[export lean_inductive_val_is_reflexive] def InductiveVal.isReflexiveEx (v : InductiveVal) : Bool := v.isReflexive
@[export lean_inductive_val_is_nested] def InductiveVal.isNestedEx (v : InductiveVal) : Bool := v.isNested
def InductiveVal.numCtors (v : InductiveVal) : Nat := v.ctors.length
structure ConstructorVal extends ConstantVal where
induct : Name -- Inductive Type this Constructor is a member of
cidx : Nat -- Constructor index (i.e., Position in the inductive declaration)
numParams : Nat -- Number of parameters in inductive datatype `induct`
numFields : Nat -- Number of fields (i.e., arity - nparams)
isUnsafe : Bool
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_constructor_val]
def mkConstructorValEx (name : Name) (levelParams : List Name) (type : Expr) (induct : Name) (cidx numParams numFields : Nat) (isUnsafe : Bool) : ConstructorVal := {
name := name,
levelParams := levelParams,
type := type,
induct := induct,
cidx := cidx,
numParams := numParams,
numFields := numFields,
isUnsafe := isUnsafe
}
@[export lean_constructor_val_is_unsafe] def ConstructorVal.isUnsafeEx (v : ConstructorVal) : Bool := v.isUnsafe
/-- Information for reducing a recursor -/
structure RecursorRule where
ctor : Name -- Reduction rule for this Constructor
nfields : Nat -- Number of fields (i.e., without counting inductive datatype parameters)
rhs : Expr -- Right hand side of the reduction rule
deriving Inhabited
structure RecursorVal extends ConstantVal where
all : List Name -- List of all inductive datatypes in the mutual declaration that generated this recursor
numParams : Nat -- Number of parameters
numIndices : Nat -- Number of indices
numMotives : Nat -- Number of motives
numMinors : Nat -- Number of minor premises
rules : List RecursorRule -- A reduction for each Constructor
k : Bool -- It supports K-like reduction
isUnsafe : Bool
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_recursor_val]
def mkRecursorValEx (name : Name) (levelParams : List Name) (type : Expr) (all : List Name) (numParams numIndices numMotives numMinors : Nat)
(rules : List RecursorRule) (k isUnsafe : Bool) : RecursorVal := {
name := name, levelParams := levelParams, type := type, all := all, numParams := numParams, numIndices := numIndices,
numMotives := numMotives, numMinors := numMinors, rules := rules, k := k, isUnsafe := isUnsafe
}
@[export lean_recursor_k] def RecursorVal.kEx (v : RecursorVal) : Bool := v.k
@[export lean_recursor_is_unsafe] def RecursorVal.isUnsafeEx (v : RecursorVal) : Bool := v.isUnsafe
def RecursorVal.getMajorIdx (v : RecursorVal) : Nat :=
v.numParams + v.numMotives + v.numMinors + v.numIndices
def RecursorVal.getFirstIndexIdx (v : RecursorVal) : Nat :=
v.numParams + v.numMotives + v.numMinors
def RecursorVal.getFirstMinorIdx (v : RecursorVal) : Nat :=
v.numParams + v.numMotives
def RecursorVal.getInduct (v : RecursorVal) : Name :=
v.name.getPrefix
inductive QuotKind where
| type -- `Quot`
| ctor -- `Quot.mk`
| lift -- `Quot.lift`
| ind -- `Quot.ind`
deriving Inhabited
structure QuotVal extends ConstantVal where
kind : QuotKind
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_quot_val]
def mkQuotValEx (name : Name) (levelParams : List Name) (type : Expr) (kind : QuotKind) : QuotVal := {
name := name, levelParams := levelParams, type := type, kind := kind
}
@[export lean_quot_val_kind] def QuotVal.kindEx (v : QuotVal) : QuotKind := v.kind
/-- Information associated with constant declarations. -/
inductive ConstantInfo where
| axiomInfo (val : AxiomVal)
| defnInfo (val : DefinitionVal)
| thmInfo (val : TheoremVal)
| opaqueInfo (val : OpaqueVal)
| quotInfo (val : QuotVal)
| inductInfo (val : InductiveVal)
| ctorInfo (val : ConstructorVal)
| recInfo (val : RecursorVal)
deriving Inhabited
namespace ConstantInfo
def toConstantVal : ConstantInfo → ConstantVal
| defnInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| axiomInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| thmInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| opaqueInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| quotInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| inductInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| ctorInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
| recInfo {toConstantVal := d, ..} => d
def isUnsafe : ConstantInfo → Bool
| defnInfo v => v.safety == DefinitionSafety.unsafe
| axiomInfo v => v.isUnsafe
| thmInfo v => false
| opaqueInfo v => v.isUnsafe
| quotInfo v => false
| inductInfo v => v.isUnsafe
| ctorInfo v => v.isUnsafe
| recInfo v => v.isUnsafe
def name (d : ConstantInfo) : Name :=
d.toConstantVal.name
def levelParams (d : ConstantInfo) : List Name :=
d.toConstantVal.levelParams
def numLevelParams (d : ConstantInfo) : Nat :=
d.levelParams.length
def type (d : ConstantInfo) : Expr :=
d.toConstantVal.type
def value? : ConstantInfo → Option Expr
| defnInfo {value := r, ..} => some r
| thmInfo {value := r, ..} => some r
| _ => none
def hasValue : ConstantInfo → Bool
| defnInfo {value := r, ..} => true
| thmInfo {value := r, ..} => true
| _ => false
def value! : ConstantInfo → Expr
| defnInfo {value := r, ..} => r
| thmInfo {value := r, ..} => r
| _ => panic! "declaration with value expected"
def hints : ConstantInfo → ReducibilityHints
| defnInfo {hints := r, ..} => r
| _ => ReducibilityHints.opaque
def isCtor : ConstantInfo → Bool
| ctorInfo _ => true
| _ => false
def isInductive : ConstantInfo → Bool
| inductInfo _ => true
| _ => false
@[extern "lean_instantiate_type_lparams"]
constant instantiateTypeLevelParams (c : @& ConstantInfo) (ls : @& List Level) : Expr
@[extern "lean_instantiate_value_lparams"]
constant instantiateValueLevelParams (c : @& ConstantInfo) (ls : @& List Level) : Expr
end ConstantInfo
def mkRecName (declName : Name) : Name :=
Name.mkStr declName "rec"
end Lean
|
cdae6bad7de76be010081ae404121d13614b330c | 5d166a16ae129621cb54ca9dde86c275d7d2b483 | /tests/lean/interactive/info_tactic.lean | 16fcb347acb33f12e554eaa4cc91285a0ffbfdd7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jcarlson23/lean | b00098763291397e0ac76b37a2dd96bc013bd247 | 8de88701247f54d325edd46c0eed57aeacb64baf | refs/heads/master | 1,611,571,813,719 | 1,497,020,963,000 | 1,497,021,515,000 | 93,882,536 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,497,029,896,000 | 1,497,029,896,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 225 | lean | open tactic
example : false :=
begin
simp,
--^ "command": "info"
simp ,
--^ "command": "info"
simp [ ],
--^ "command": "info"
simp [d] ,
--^ "command": "info"
get_env
--^ "command": "info"
end
|
15fe186bf73ab126b266fd13c8fa979cc0fea266 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/binrel_binop.lean | 9b5840fa6de06f8bb25b7d37ea5c011a3a1f5517 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 214 | lean | theorem ex1 (a : Int) (b c : Nat) : a = ↑b - ↑c := sorry
#check ex1
theorem ex2 (a : Int) (b c : Nat) : a = b - c := sorry
#check ex2
theorem ex3 (a : Int) (b c : Nat) : a = ↑(b - c) := sorry
#check ex3
|
a63ab0e738b9554a205b6796147c781fe907e9a2 | d9d511f37a523cd7659d6f573f990e2a0af93c6f | /src/topology/algebra/infinite_sum.lean | f1baeeea27b92806e9181d9a2fb5c132c11a4aa5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hikari0108/mathlib | b7ea2b7350497ab1a0b87a09d093ecc025a50dfa | a9e7d333b0cfd45f13a20f7b96b7d52e19fa2901 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,483,608,260 | 1,631,541,580,000 | 1,631,541,580,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 57,617 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.big_operators.intervals
import topology.instances.real
import topology.algebra.module
import algebra.indicator_function
import data.equiv.encodable.lattice
import data.fintype.card
import data.nat.parity
import algebra.big_operators.nat_antidiagonal
import order.filter.at_top_bot
/-!
# Infinite sum over a topological monoid
This sum is known as unconditionally convergent, as it sums to the same value under all possible
permutations. For Euclidean spaces (finite dimensional Banach spaces) this is equivalent to absolute
convergence.
Note: There are summable sequences which are not unconditionally convergent! The other way holds
generally, see `has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat`.
## References
* Bourbaki: General Topology (1995), Chapter 3 §5 (Infinite sums in commutative groups)
-/
noncomputable theory
open finset filter function classical
open_locale topological_space classical big_operators nnreal
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
section has_sum
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α]
/-- Infinite sum on a topological monoid
The `at_top` filter on `finset β` is the limit of all finite sets towards the entire type. So we sum
up bigger and bigger sets. This sum operation is invariant under reordering. In particular,
the function `ℕ → ℝ` sending `n` to `(-1)^n / (n+1)` does not have a
sum for this definition, but a series which is absolutely convergent will have the correct sum.
This is based on Mario Carneiro's
[infinite sum `df-tsms` in Metamath](http://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/df-tsms.html).
For the definition or many statements, `α` does not need to be a topological monoid. We only add
this assumption later, for the lemmas where it is relevant.
-/
def has_sum (f : β → α) (a : α) : Prop := tendsto (λs:finset β, ∑ b in s, f b) at_top (𝓝 a)
/-- `summable f` means that `f` has some (infinite) sum. Use `tsum` to get the value. -/
def summable (f : β → α) : Prop := ∃a, has_sum f a
/-- `∑' i, f i` is the sum of `f` it exists, or 0 otherwise -/
@[irreducible] def tsum {β} (f : β → α) := if h : summable f then classical.some h else 0
-- see Note [operator precedence of big operators]
notation `∑'` binders `, ` r:(scoped:67 f, tsum f) := r
variables {f g : β → α} {a b : α} {s : finset β}
lemma summable.has_sum (ha : summable f) : has_sum f (∑'b, f b) :=
by simp [ha, tsum]; exact some_spec ha
lemma has_sum.summable (h : has_sum f a) : summable f := ⟨a, h⟩
/-- Constant zero function has sum `0` -/
lemma has_sum_zero : has_sum (λb, 0 : β → α) 0 :=
by simp [has_sum, tendsto_const_nhds]
lemma has_sum_empty [is_empty β] : has_sum f 0 :=
by convert has_sum_zero
lemma summable_zero : summable (λb, 0 : β → α) := has_sum_zero.summable
lemma summable_empty [is_empty β] : summable f := has_sum_empty.summable
lemma tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (h : ¬ summable f) : ∑'b, f b = 0 :=
by simp [tsum, h]
lemma summable_congr (hfg : ∀b, f b = g b) :
summable f ↔ summable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg summable $ funext hfg)
lemma summable.congr (hf : summable f) (hfg : ∀b, f b = g b) :
summable g :=
(summable_congr hfg).mp hf
lemma has_sum.has_sum_of_sum_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀u:finset γ, ∃v:finset β, ∀v', v ⊆ v' → ∃u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∑ x in u', g x = ∑ b in v', f b)
(hf : has_sum g a) :
has_sum f a :=
le_trans (map_at_top_finset_sum_le_of_sum_eq h_eq) hf
lemma has_sum_iff_has_sum {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀u:finset γ, ∃v:finset β, ∀v', v ⊆ v' → ∃u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∑ x in u', g x = ∑ b in v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀v:finset β, ∃u:finset γ, ∀u', u ⊆ u' → ∃v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∑ b in v', f b = ∑ x in u', g x) :
has_sum f a ↔ has_sum g a :=
⟨has_sum.has_sum_of_sum_eq h₂, has_sum.has_sum_of_sum_eq h₁⟩
lemma function.injective.has_sum_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ set.range g, f x = 0) :
has_sum (f ∘ g) a ↔ has_sum f a :=
by simp only [has_sum, tendsto, hg.map_at_top_finset_sum_eq hf]
lemma function.injective.summable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ set.range g, f x = 0) :
summable (f ∘ g) ↔ summable f :=
exists_congr $ λ _, hg.has_sum_iff hf
lemma has_sum_subtype_iff_of_support_subset {s : set β} (hf : support f ⊆ s) :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a ↔ has_sum f a :=
subtype.coe_injective.has_sum_iff $ by simpa using support_subset_iff'.1 hf
lemma has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator {s : set β} :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a ↔ has_sum (s.indicator f) a :=
by rw [← set.indicator_range_comp, subtype.range_coe,
has_sum_subtype_iff_of_support_subset set.support_indicator_subset]
@[simp] lemma has_sum_subtype_support : has_sum (f ∘ coe : support f → α) a ↔ has_sum f a :=
has_sum_subtype_iff_of_support_subset $ set.subset.refl _
lemma has_sum_fintype [fintype β] (f : β → α) : has_sum f (∑ b, f b) :=
order_top.tendsto_at_top_nhds _
protected lemma finset.has_sum (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : (↑s : set β) → α) (∑ b in s, f b) :=
by { rw ← sum_attach, exact has_sum_fintype _ }
protected lemma finset.summable (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
summable (f ∘ coe : (↑s : set β) → α) :=
(s.has_sum f).summable
protected lemma set.finite.summable {s : set β} (hs : s.finite) (f : β → α) :
summable (f ∘ coe : s → α) :=
by convert hs.to_finset.summable f; simp only [hs.coe_to_finset]
/-- If a function `f` vanishes outside of a finite set `s`, then it `has_sum` `∑ b in s, f b`. -/
lemma has_sum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero (hf : ∀b∉s, f b = 0) : has_sum f (∑ b in s, f b) :=
(has_sum_subtype_iff_of_support_subset $ support_subset_iff'.2 hf).1 $ s.has_sum f
lemma summable_of_ne_finset_zero (hf : ∀b∉s, f b = 0) : summable f :=
(has_sum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero hf).summable
lemma has_sum_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀b' ≠ b, f b' = 0) :
has_sum f (f b) :=
suffices has_sum f (∑ b' in {b}, f b'),
by simpa using this,
has_sum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero $ by simpa [hf]
lemma has_sum_ite_eq (b : β) [decidable_pred (= b)] (a : α) :
has_sum (λb', if b' = b then a else 0) a :=
begin
convert has_sum_single b _,
{ exact (if_pos rfl).symm },
assume b' hb',
exact if_neg hb'
end
lemma equiv.has_sum_iff (e : γ ≃ β) :
has_sum (f ∘ e) a ↔ has_sum f a :=
e.injective.has_sum_iff $ by simp
lemma function.injective.has_sum_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : injective g) :
has_sum (λ x : set.range g, f x) a ↔ has_sum (f ∘ g) a :=
(equiv.of_injective g hg).has_sum_iff.symm
lemma equiv.summable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) :
summable (f ∘ e) ↔ summable f :=
exists_congr $ λ a, e.has_sum_iff
lemma summable.prod_symm {f : β × γ → α} (hf : summable f) : summable (λ p : γ × β, f p.swap) :=
(equiv.prod_comm γ β).summable_iff.2 hf
lemma equiv.has_sum_iff_of_support {g : γ → α} (e : support f ≃ support g)
(he : ∀ x : support f, g (e x) = f x) :
has_sum f a ↔ has_sum g a :=
have (g ∘ coe) ∘ e = f ∘ coe, from funext he,
by rw [← has_sum_subtype_support, ← this, e.has_sum_iff, has_sum_subtype_support]
lemma has_sum_iff_has_sum_of_ne_zero_bij {g : γ → α} (i : support g → β)
(hi : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, i x = i y → (x : γ) = y)
(hf : support f ⊆ set.range i) (hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) :
has_sum f a ↔ has_sum g a :=
iff.symm $ equiv.has_sum_iff_of_support
(equiv.of_bijective (λ x, ⟨i x, λ hx, x.coe_prop $ hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨λ x y h, subtype.ext $ hi $ subtype.ext_iff.1 h,
λ y, (hf y.coe_prop).imp $ λ x hx, subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
lemma equiv.summable_iff_of_support {g : γ → α} (e : support f ≃ support g)
(he : ∀ x : support f, g (e x) = f x) :
summable f ↔ summable g :=
exists_congr $ λ _, e.has_sum_iff_of_support he
protected lemma has_sum.map [add_comm_monoid γ] [topological_space γ] (hf : has_sum f a)
(g : α →+ γ) (hg : continuous g) :
has_sum (g ∘ f) (g a) :=
have g ∘ (λs:finset β, ∑ b in s, f b) = (λs:finset β, ∑ b in s, g (f b)),
from funext $ g.map_sum _,
show tendsto (λs:finset β, ∑ b in s, g (f b)) at_top (𝓝 (g a)),
from this ▸ (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
protected lemma summable.map [add_comm_monoid γ] [topological_space γ] (hf : summable f)
(g : α →+ γ) (hg : continuous g) :
summable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.has_sum.map g hg).summable
/-- If `f : ℕ → α` has sum `a`, then the partial sums `∑_{i=0}^{n-1} f i` converge to `a`. -/
lemma has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat {f : ℕ → α} (h : has_sum f a) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, ∑ i in range n, f i) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
h.comp tendsto_finset_range
lemma has_sum.unique {a₁ a₂ : α} [t2_space α] : has_sum f a₁ → has_sum f a₂ → a₁ = a₂ :=
tendsto_nhds_unique
lemma summable.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat [t2_space α] {f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : summable f) :
has_sum f a ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, ∑ i in range n, f i) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, h.tendsto_sum_nat, λ h, _⟩,
rw tendsto_nhds_unique h hf.has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat,
exact hf.has_sum
end
lemma equiv.summable_iff_of_has_sum_iff {α' : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α']
[topological_space α'] (e : α' ≃ α) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(he : ∀ {a}, has_sum f (e a) ↔ has_sum g a) :
summable f ↔ summable g :=
⟨λ ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨e.symm a, he.1 $ by rwa [e.apply_symm_apply]⟩, λ ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨e a, he.2 ha⟩⟩
variable [has_continuous_add α]
lemma has_sum.add (hf : has_sum f a) (hg : has_sum g b) : has_sum (λb, f b + g b) (a + b) :=
by simp only [has_sum, sum_add_distrib]; exact hf.add hg
lemma summable.add (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : summable (λb, f b + g b) :=
(hf.has_sum.add hg.has_sum).summable
lemma has_sum_sum {f : γ → β → α} {a : γ → α} {s : finset γ} :
(∀i∈s, has_sum (f i) (a i)) → has_sum (λb, ∑ i in s, f i b) (∑ i in s, a i) :=
finset.induction_on s (by simp only [has_sum_zero, sum_empty, forall_true_iff])
(by simp only [has_sum.add, sum_insert, mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp,
forall_2_true_iff, not_false_iff, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt})
lemma summable_sum {f : γ → β → α} {s : finset γ} (hf : ∀i∈s, summable (f i)) :
summable (λb, ∑ i in s, f i b) :=
(has_sum_sum $ assume i hi, (hf i hi).has_sum).summable
lemma has_sum.add_disjoint {s t : set β} (hs : disjoint s t)
(ha : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a) (hb : has_sum (f ∘ coe : t → α) b) :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : s ∪ t → α) (a + b) :=
begin
rw has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator at *,
rw set.indicator_union_of_disjoint hs,
exact ha.add hb
end
lemma has_sum.add_is_compl {s t : set β} (hs : is_compl s t)
(ha : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a) (hb : has_sum (f ∘ coe : t → α) b) :
has_sum f (a + b) :=
by simpa [← hs.compl_eq]
using (has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator.1 ha).add (has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator.1 hb)
lemma has_sum.add_compl {s : set β} (ha : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a)
(hb : has_sum (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) b) :
has_sum f (a + b) :=
ha.add_is_compl is_compl_compl hb
lemma summable.add_compl {s : set β} (hs : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α))
(hsc : summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α)) :
summable f :=
(hs.has_sum.add_compl hsc.has_sum).summable
lemma has_sum.compl_add {s : set β} (ha : has_sum (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) a)
(hb : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) b) :
has_sum f (a + b) :=
ha.add_is_compl is_compl_compl.symm hb
lemma has_sum.even_add_odd {f : ℕ → α} (he : has_sum (λ k, f (2 * k)) a)
(ho : has_sum (λ k, f (2 * k + 1)) b) :
has_sum f (a + b) :=
begin
have := mul_right_injective' (@two_ne_zero ℕ _ _),
replace he := this.has_sum_range_iff.2 he,
replace ho := ((add_left_injective 1).comp this).has_sum_range_iff.2 ho,
refine he.add_is_compl _ ho,
simpa [(∘)] using nat.is_compl_even_odd
end
lemma summable.compl_add {s : set β} (hs : summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α))
(hsc : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α)) :
summable f :=
(hs.has_sum.compl_add hsc.has_sum).summable
lemma summable.even_add_odd {f : ℕ → α} (he : summable (λ k, f (2 * k)))
(ho : summable (λ k, f (2 * k + 1))) :
summable f :=
(he.has_sum.even_add_odd ho.has_sum).summable
lemma has_sum.sigma [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σ b:β, γ b) → α} {g : β → α} {a : α}
(ha : has_sum f a) (hf : ∀b, has_sum (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩) (g b)) : has_sum g a :=
begin
refine (at_top_basis.tendsto_iff (closed_nhds_basis a)).mpr _,
rintros s ⟨hs, hsc⟩,
rcases mem_at_top_sets.mp (ha hs) with ⟨u, hu⟩,
use [u.image sigma.fst, trivial],
intros bs hbs,
simp only [set.mem_preimage, ge_iff_le, finset.le_iff_subset] at hu,
have : tendsto (λ t : finset (Σ b, γ b), ∑ p in t.filter (λ p, p.1 ∈ bs), f p)
at_top (𝓝 $ ∑ b in bs, g b),
{ simp only [← sigma_preimage_mk, sum_sigma],
refine tendsto_finset_sum _ (λ b hb, _),
change tendsto (λ t, (λ t, ∑ s in t, f ⟨b, s⟩) (preimage t (sigma.mk b) _)) at_top (𝓝 (g b)),
exact tendsto.comp (hf b) (tendsto_finset_preimage_at_top_at_top _) },
refine hsc.mem_of_tendsto this (eventually_at_top.2 ⟨u, λ t ht, hu _ (λ x hx, _)⟩),
exact mem_filter.2 ⟨ht hx, hbs $ mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
end
/-- If a series `f` on `β × γ` has sum `a` and for each `b` the restriction of `f` to `{b} × γ`
has sum `g b`, then the series `g` has sum `a`. -/
lemma has_sum.prod_fiberwise [regular_space α] {f : β × γ → α} {g : β → α} {a : α}
(ha : has_sum f a) (hf : ∀b, has_sum (λc, f (b, c)) (g b)) :
has_sum g a :=
has_sum.sigma ((equiv.sigma_equiv_prod β γ).has_sum_iff.2 ha) hf
lemma summable.sigma' [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(ha : summable f) (hf : ∀b, summable (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩)) :
summable (λb, ∑'c, f ⟨b, c⟩) :=
(ha.has_sum.sigma (assume b, (hf b).has_sum)).summable
lemma has_sum.sigma_of_has_sum [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σ b:β, γ b) → α} {g : β → α}
{a : α} (ha : has_sum g a) (hf : ∀b, has_sum (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩) (g b)) (hf' : summable f) :
has_sum f a :=
by simpa [(hf'.has_sum.sigma hf).unique ha] using hf'.has_sum
end has_sum
section tsum
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α] [t2_space α]
variables {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum.tsum_eq (ha : has_sum f a) : ∑'b, f b = a :=
(summable.has_sum ⟨a, ha⟩).unique ha
lemma summable.has_sum_iff (h : summable f) : has_sum f a ↔ ∑'b, f b = a :=
iff.intro has_sum.tsum_eq (assume eq, eq ▸ h.has_sum)
@[simp] lemma tsum_zero : ∑'b:β, (0:α) = 0 := has_sum_zero.tsum_eq
@[simp] lemma tsum_empty [is_empty β] : ∑'b, f b = 0 := has_sum_empty.tsum_eq
lemma tsum_eq_sum {f : β → α} {s : finset β} (hf : ∀b∉s, f b = 0) :
∑' b, f b = ∑ b in s, f b :=
(has_sum_sum_of_ne_finset_zero hf).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_congr {α β : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α]
{f g : β → α} (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : ∑' b, f b = ∑' b, g b :=
congr_arg tsum (funext hfg)
lemma tsum_fintype [fintype β] (f : β → α) : ∑'b, f b = ∑ b, f b :=
(has_sum_fintype f).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_bool (f : bool → α) : ∑' i : bool, f i = f false + f true :=
by { rw [tsum_fintype, finset.sum_eq_add]; simp }
@[simp] lemma finset.tsum_subtype (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∑' x : {x // x ∈ s}, f x = ∑ x in s, f x :=
(s.has_sum f).tsum_eq
@[simp] lemma finset.tsum_subtype' (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∑' x : (s : set β), f x = ∑ x in s, f x :=
s.tsum_subtype f
lemma tsum_eq_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀b' ≠ b, f b' = 0) :
∑'b, f b = f b :=
(has_sum_single b hf).tsum_eq
@[simp] lemma tsum_ite_eq (b : β) [decidable_pred (= b)] (a : α) :
∑' b', (if b' = b then a else 0) = a :=
(has_sum_ite_eq b a).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_dite_right (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : β → ¬ P → α) :
∑' (b : β), (if h : P then (0 : α) else x b h) = if h : P then (0 : α) else ∑' (b : β), x b h :=
by by_cases hP : P; simp [hP]
lemma tsum_dite_left (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : β → P → α) :
∑' (b : β), (if h : P then x b h else 0) = if h : P then (∑' (b : β), x b h) else 0 :=
by by_cases hP : P; simp [hP]
lemma equiv.tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum {α' : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α']
[topological_space α'] (e : α' ≃ α) (h0 : e 0 = 0) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(h : ∀ {a}, has_sum f (e a) ↔ has_sum g a) :
∑' b, f b = e (∑' c, g c) :=
by_cases
(assume : summable g, (h.mpr this.has_sum).tsum_eq)
(assume hg : ¬ summable g,
have hf : ¬ summable f, from mt (e.summable_iff_of_has_sum_iff @h).1 hg,
by simp [tsum, hf, hg, h0])
lemma tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum {f : β → α} {g : γ → α}
(h : ∀{a}, has_sum f a ↔ has_sum g a) :
∑'b, f b = ∑'c, g c :=
(equiv.refl α).tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum rfl @h
lemma equiv.tsum_eq (j : γ ≃ β) (f : β → α) : ∑'c, f (j c) = ∑'b, f b :=
tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum $ λ a, j.has_sum_iff
lemma equiv.tsum_eq_tsum_of_support {f : β → α} {g : γ → α} (e : support f ≃ support g)
(he : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
(∑' x, f x) = ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum $ λ _, e.has_sum_iff_of_support he
lemma tsum_eq_tsum_of_ne_zero_bij {g : γ → α} (i : support g → β)
(hi : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, i x = i y → (x : γ) = y)
(hf : support f ⊆ set.range i) (hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) :
∑' x, f x = ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum $ λ _, has_sum_iff_has_sum_of_ne_zero_bij i hi hf hfg
lemma tsum_subtype (s : set β) (f : β → α) :
∑' x:s, f x = ∑' x, s.indicator f x :=
tsum_eq_tsum_of_has_sum_iff_has_sum $ λ _, has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator
section has_continuous_add
variable [has_continuous_add α]
lemma tsum_add (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : ∑'b, (f b + g b) = (∑'b, f b) + (∑'b, g b) :=
(hf.has_sum.add hg.has_sum).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_sum {f : γ → β → α} {s : finset γ} (hf : ∀i∈s, summable (f i)) :
∑'b, ∑ i in s, f i b = ∑ i in s, ∑'b, f i b :=
(has_sum_sum $ assume i hi, (hf i hi).has_sum).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_sigma' [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(h₁ : ∀b, summable (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩)) (h₂ : summable f) : ∑'p, f p = ∑'b c, f ⟨b, c⟩ :=
(h₂.has_sum.sigma (assume b, (h₁ b).has_sum)).tsum_eq.symm
lemma tsum_prod' [regular_space α] {f : β × γ → α} (h : summable f)
(h₁ : ∀b, summable (λc, f (b, c))) :
∑'p, f p = ∑'b c, f (b, c) :=
(h.has_sum.prod_fiberwise (assume b, (h₁ b).has_sum)).tsum_eq.symm
lemma tsum_comm' [regular_space α] {f : β → γ → α} (h : summable (function.uncurry f))
(h₁ : ∀b, summable (f b)) (h₂ : ∀ c, summable (λ b, f b c)) :
∑' c b, f b c = ∑' b c, f b c :=
begin
erw [← tsum_prod' h h₁, ← tsum_prod' h.prod_symm h₂, ← (equiv.prod_comm β γ).tsum_eq],
refl,
assumption
end
end has_continuous_add
section encodable
open encodable
variable [encodable γ]
/-- You can compute a sum over an encodably type by summing over the natural numbers and
taking a supremum. This is useful for outer measures. -/
theorem tsum_supr_decode₂ [complete_lattice β] (m : β → α) (m0 : m ⊥ = 0)
(s : γ → β) : ∑' i : ℕ, m (⨆ b ∈ decode₂ γ i, s b) = ∑' b : γ, m (s b) :=
begin
have H : ∀ n, m (⨆ b ∈ decode₂ γ n, s b) ≠ 0 → (decode₂ γ n).is_some,
{ intros n h,
cases decode₂ γ n with b,
{ refine (h $ by simp [m0]).elim },
{ exact rfl } },
symmetry, refine tsum_eq_tsum_of_ne_zero_bij (λ a, option.get (H a.1 a.2)) _ _ _,
{ rintros ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ e,
have := mem_decode₂.1 (option.get_mem (H n hn)),
rwa [← e, mem_decode₂.1 (option.get_mem (H m hm))] at this },
{ intros b h,
refine ⟨⟨encode b, _⟩, _⟩,
{ simp only [mem_support, encodek₂] at h ⊢, convert h, simp [set.ext_iff, encodek₂] },
{ exact option.get_of_mem _ (encodek₂ _) } },
{ rintros ⟨n, h⟩, dsimp only [subtype.coe_mk],
transitivity, swap,
rw [show decode₂ γ n = _, from option.get_mem (H n h)],
congr, simp [ext_iff, -option.some_get] }
end
/-- `tsum_supr_decode₂` specialized to the complete lattice of sets. -/
theorem tsum_Union_decode₂ (m : set β → α) (m0 : m ∅ = 0)
(s : γ → set β) : ∑' i, m (⋃ b ∈ decode₂ γ i, s b) = ∑' b, m (s b) :=
tsum_supr_decode₂ m m0 s
/-! Some properties about measure-like functions.
These could also be functions defined on complete sublattices of sets, with the property
that they are countably sub-additive.
`R` will probably be instantiated with `(≤)` in all applications.
-/
/-- If a function is countably sub-additive then it is sub-additive on encodable types -/
theorem rel_supr_tsum [complete_lattice β] (m : β → α) (m0 : m ⊥ = 0)
(R : α → α → Prop) (m_supr : ∀(s : ℕ → β), R (m (⨆ i, s i)) ∑' i, m (s i))
(s : γ → β) : R (m (⨆ b : γ, s b)) ∑' b : γ, m (s b) :=
by { rw [← supr_decode₂, ← tsum_supr_decode₂ _ m0 s], exact m_supr _ }
/-- If a function is countably sub-additive then it is sub-additive on finite sets -/
theorem rel_supr_sum [complete_lattice β] (m : β → α) (m0 : m ⊥ = 0)
(R : α → α → Prop) (m_supr : ∀(s : ℕ → β), R (m (⨆ i, s i)) (∑' i, m (s i)))
(s : δ → β) (t : finset δ) :
R (m (⨆ d ∈ t, s d)) (∑ d in t, m (s d)) :=
by { cases t.nonempty_encodable, rw [supr_subtype'], convert rel_supr_tsum m m0 R m_supr _,
rw [← finset.tsum_subtype], assumption }
/-- If a function is countably sub-additive then it is binary sub-additive -/
theorem rel_sup_add [complete_lattice β] (m : β → α) (m0 : m ⊥ = 0)
(R : α → α → Prop) (m_supr : ∀(s : ℕ → β), R (m (⨆ i, s i)) (∑' i, m (s i)))
(s₁ s₂ : β) : R (m (s₁ ⊔ s₂)) (m s₁ + m s₂) :=
begin
convert rel_supr_tsum m m0 R m_supr (λ b, cond b s₁ s₂),
{ simp only [supr_bool_eq, cond] },
{ rw [tsum_fintype, fintype.sum_bool, cond, cond] }
end
end encodable
variables [has_continuous_add α]
lemma tsum_add_tsum_compl {s : set β} (hs : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α))
(hsc : summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α)) :
(∑' x : s, f x) + (∑' x : sᶜ, f x) = ∑' x, f x :=
(hs.has_sum.add_compl hsc.has_sum).tsum_eq.symm
lemma tsum_union_disjoint {s t : set β} (hd : disjoint s t)
(hs : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α)) (ht : summable (f ∘ coe : t → α)) :
(∑' x : s ∪ t, f x) = (∑' x : s, f x) + (∑' x : t, f x) :=
(hs.has_sum.add_disjoint hd ht.has_sum).tsum_eq
lemma tsum_even_add_odd {f : ℕ → α} (he : summable (λ k, f (2 * k)))
(ho : summable (λ k, f (2 * k + 1))) :
(∑' k, f (2 * k)) + (∑' k, f (2 * k + 1)) = ∑' k, f k :=
(he.has_sum.even_add_odd ho.has_sum).tsum_eq.symm
end tsum
section pi
variables {ι : Type*} {π : α → Type*} [∀ x, add_comm_monoid (π x)] [∀ x, topological_space (π x)]
lemma pi.has_sum {f : ι → ∀ x, π x} {g : ∀ x, π x} :
has_sum f g ↔ ∀ x, has_sum (λ i, f i x) (g x) :=
by simp only [has_sum, tendsto_pi, sum_apply]
lemma pi.summable {f : ι → ∀ x, π x} : summable f ↔ ∀ x, summable (λ i, f i x) :=
by simp only [summable, pi.has_sum, skolem]
lemma tsum_apply [∀ x, t2_space (π x)] {f : ι → ∀ x, π x}{x : α} (hf : summable f) :
(∑' i, f i) x = ∑' i, f i x :=
(pi.has_sum.mp hf.has_sum x).tsum_eq.symm
end pi
section topological_group
variables [add_comm_group α] [topological_space α] [topological_add_group α]
variables {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
-- `by simpa using` speeds up elaboration. Why?
lemma has_sum.neg (h : has_sum f a) : has_sum (λb, - f b) (- a) :=
by simpa only using h.map (-add_monoid_hom.id α) continuous_neg
lemma summable.neg (hf : summable f) : summable (λb, - f b) :=
hf.has_sum.neg.summable
lemma summable.of_neg (hf : summable (λb, - f b)) : summable f :=
by simpa only [neg_neg] using hf.neg
lemma summable_neg_iff : summable (λ b, - f b) ↔ summable f :=
⟨summable.of_neg, summable.neg⟩
lemma has_sum.sub (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) : has_sum (λb, f b - g b) (a₁ - a₂) :=
by { simp only [sub_eq_add_neg], exact hf.add hg.neg }
lemma summable.sub (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : summable (λb, f b - g b) :=
(hf.has_sum.sub hg.has_sum).summable
lemma summable.trans_sub (hg : summable g) (hfg : summable (λb, f b - g b)) :
summable f :=
by simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using hfg.add hg
lemma summable_iff_of_summable_sub (hfg : summable (λb, f b - g b)) :
summable f ↔ summable g :=
⟨λ hf, hf.trans_sub $ by simpa only [neg_sub] using hfg.neg, λ hg, hg.trans_sub hfg⟩
lemma has_sum.update (hf : has_sum f a₁) (b : β) [decidable_eq β] (a : α) :
has_sum (update f b a) (a - f b + a₁) :=
begin
convert ((has_sum_ite_eq b _).add hf),
ext b',
by_cases h : b' = b,
{ rw [h, update_same],
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, if_true, sub_add_cancel] },
simp only [h, update_noteq, if_false, ne.def, zero_add, not_false_iff],
end
lemma summable.update (hf : summable f) (b : β) [decidable_eq β] (a : α) :
summable (update f b a) :=
(hf.has_sum.update b a).summable
lemma has_sum.has_sum_compl_iff {s : set β} (hf : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a₁) :
has_sum (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) a₂ ↔ has_sum f (a₁ + a₂) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, hf.add_compl h, λ h, _⟩,
rw [has_sum_subtype_iff_indicator] at hf ⊢,
rw [set.indicator_compl],
simpa only [add_sub_cancel'] using h.sub hf
end
lemma has_sum.has_sum_iff_compl {s : set β} (hf : has_sum (f ∘ coe : s → α) a₁) :
has_sum f a₂ ↔ has_sum (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) (a₂ - a₁) :=
iff.symm $ hf.has_sum_compl_iff.trans $ by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
lemma summable.summable_compl_iff {s : set β} (hf : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α)) :
summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) ↔ summable f :=
⟨λ ⟨a, ha⟩, (hf.has_sum.has_sum_compl_iff.1 ha).summable,
λ ⟨a, ha⟩, (hf.has_sum.has_sum_iff_compl.1 ha).summable⟩
protected lemma finset.has_sum_compl_iff (s : finset β) :
has_sum (λ x : {x // x ∉ s}, f x) a ↔ has_sum f (a + ∑ i in s, f i) :=
(s.has_sum f).has_sum_compl_iff.trans $ by rw [add_comm]
protected lemma finset.has_sum_iff_compl (s : finset β) :
has_sum f a ↔ has_sum (λ x : {x // x ∉ s}, f x) (a - ∑ i in s, f i) :=
(s.has_sum f).has_sum_iff_compl
protected lemma finset.summable_compl_iff (s : finset β) :
summable (λ x : {x // x ∉ s}, f x) ↔ summable f :=
(s.summable f).summable_compl_iff
lemma set.finite.summable_compl_iff {s : set β} (hs : s.finite) :
summable (f ∘ coe : sᶜ → α) ↔ summable f :=
(hs.summable f).summable_compl_iff
lemma has_sum_ite_eq_extract [decidable_eq β] (hf : has_sum f a) (b : β) :
has_sum (λ n, ite (n = b) 0 (f n)) (a - f b) :=
begin
convert hf.update b 0 using 1,
{ ext n, rw function.update_apply, },
{ rw [sub_add_eq_add_sub, zero_add], },
end
section tsum
variables [t2_space α]
lemma tsum_neg (hf : summable f) : ∑'b, - f b = - ∑'b, f b :=
hf.has_sum.neg.tsum_eq
lemma tsum_sub (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : ∑'b, (f b - g b) = ∑'b, f b - ∑'b, g b :=
(hf.has_sum.sub hg.has_sum).tsum_eq
lemma sum_add_tsum_compl {s : finset β} (hf : summable f) :
(∑ x in s, f x) + (∑' x : (↑s : set β)ᶜ, f x) = ∑' x, f x :=
((s.has_sum f).add_compl (s.summable_compl_iff.2 hf).has_sum).tsum_eq.symm
/-- Let `f : β → α` be a sequence with summable series and let `b ∈ β` be an index.
Lemma `tsum_ite_eq_extract` writes `Σ f n` as the sum of `f b` plus the series of the
remaining terms. -/
lemma tsum_ite_eq_extract [decidable_eq β] (hf : summable f) (b : β) :
∑' n, f n = f b + ∑' n, ite (n = b) 0 (f n) :=
begin
rw (has_sum_ite_eq_extract hf.has_sum b).tsum_eq,
exact (add_sub_cancel'_right _ _).symm,
end
end tsum
/-!
### Sums on subtypes
If `s` is a finset of `α`, we show that the summability of `f` in the whole space and on the subtype
`univ - s` are equivalent, and relate their sums. For a function defined on `ℕ`, we deduce the
formula `(∑ i in range k, f i) + (∑' i, f (i + k)) = (∑' i, f i)`, in `sum_add_tsum_nat_add`.
-/
section subtype
lemma has_sum_nat_add_iff {f : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) {a : α} :
has_sum (λ n, f (n + k)) a ↔ has_sum f (a + ∑ i in range k, f i) :=
begin
refine iff.trans _ ((range k).has_sum_compl_iff),
rw [← (not_mem_range_equiv k).symm.has_sum_iff],
refl
end
lemma summable_nat_add_iff {f : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) : summable (λ n, f (n + k)) ↔ summable f :=
iff.symm $ (equiv.add_right (∑ i in range k, f i)).summable_iff_of_has_sum_iff $
λ a, (has_sum_nat_add_iff k).symm
lemma has_sum_nat_add_iff' {f : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) {a : α} :
has_sum (λ n, f (n + k)) (a - ∑ i in range k, f i) ↔ has_sum f a :=
by simp [has_sum_nat_add_iff]
lemma sum_add_tsum_nat_add [t2_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) (h : summable f) :
(∑ i in range k, f i) + (∑' i, f (i + k)) = ∑' i, f i :=
by simpa only [add_comm] using
((has_sum_nat_add_iff k).1 ((summable_nat_add_iff k).2 h).has_sum).unique h.has_sum
lemma tsum_eq_zero_add [t2_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (hf : summable f) :
∑'b, f b = f 0 + ∑'b, f (b + 1) :=
by simpa only [sum_range_one] using (sum_add_tsum_nat_add 1 hf).symm
/-- For `f : ℕ → α`, then `∑' k, f (k + i)` tends to zero. This does not require a summability
assumption on `f`, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
lemma tendsto_sum_nat_add [t2_space α] (f : ℕ → α) : tendsto (λ i, ∑' k, f (k + i)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ have h₀ : (λ i, (∑' i, f i) - ∑ j in range i, f j) = λ i, ∑' (k : ℕ), f (k + i),
{ ext1 i,
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, add_comm, sum_add_tsum_nat_add i hf] },
have h₁ : tendsto (λ i : ℕ, ∑' i, f i) at_top (𝓝 (∑' i, f i)) := tendsto_const_nhds,
simpa only [h₀, sub_self] using tendsto.sub h₁ hf.has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat },
{ convert tendsto_const_nhds,
ext1 i,
rw ← summable_nat_add_iff i at hf,
{ exact tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf },
{ apply_instance } }
end
end subtype
end topological_group
section topological_ring
variables [semiring α] [topological_space α] [topological_ring α]
variables {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum.mul_left (a₂) (h : has_sum f a₁) : has_sum (λb, a₂ * f b) (a₂ * a₁) :=
by simpa only using h.map (add_monoid_hom.mul_left a₂) (continuous_const.mul continuous_id)
lemma has_sum.mul_right (a₂) (hf : has_sum f a₁) : has_sum (λb, f b * a₂) (a₁ * a₂) :=
by simpa only using hf.map (add_monoid_hom.mul_right a₂) (continuous_id.mul continuous_const)
lemma summable.mul_left (a) (hf : summable f) : summable (λb, a * f b) :=
(hf.has_sum.mul_left _).summable
lemma summable.mul_right (a) (hf : summable f) : summable (λb, f b * a) :=
(hf.has_sum.mul_right _).summable
section tsum
variables [t2_space α]
lemma summable.tsum_mul_left (a) (hf : summable f) : ∑'b, a * f b = a * ∑'b, f b :=
(hf.has_sum.mul_left _).tsum_eq
lemma summable.tsum_mul_right (a) (hf : summable f) : (∑'b, f b * a) = (∑'b, f b) * a :=
(hf.has_sum.mul_right _).tsum_eq
end tsum
end topological_ring
section has_continuous_smul
variables {R : Type*}
[monoid R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space α] [add_comm_monoid α]
[distrib_mul_action R α] [has_continuous_smul R α]
{f : β → α}
lemma has_sum.smul {a : α} {r : R} (hf : has_sum f a) : has_sum (λ z, r • f z) (r • a) :=
hf.map (distrib_mul_action.to_add_monoid_hom α r) (continuous_const.smul continuous_id)
lemma summable.smul {r : R} (hf : summable f) : summable (λ z, r • f z) :=
hf.has_sum.smul.summable
lemma tsum_smul [t2_space α] {r : R} (hf : summable f) : ∑' z, r • f z = r • ∑' z, f z :=
hf.has_sum.smul.tsum_eq
end has_continuous_smul
section division_ring
variables [division_ring α] [topological_space α] [topological_ring α]
{f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum.div_const (h : has_sum f a) (b : α) : has_sum (λ x, f x / b) (a / b) :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, h.mul_right b⁻¹]
lemma summable.div_const (h : summable f) (b : α) : summable (λ x, f x / b) :=
(h.has_sum.div_const b).summable
lemma has_sum_mul_left_iff (h : a₂ ≠ 0) : has_sum f a₁ ↔ has_sum (λb, a₂ * f b) (a₂ * a₁) :=
⟨has_sum.mul_left _, λ H, by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left' h] using H.mul_left a₂⁻¹⟩
lemma has_sum_mul_right_iff (h : a₂ ≠ 0) : has_sum f a₁ ↔ has_sum (λb, f b * a₂) (a₁ * a₂) :=
⟨has_sum.mul_right _, λ H, by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right' h] using H.mul_right a₂⁻¹⟩
lemma summable_mul_left_iff (h : a ≠ 0) : summable f ↔ summable (λb, a * f b) :=
⟨λ H, H.mul_left _, λ H, by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left' h] using H.mul_left a⁻¹⟩
lemma summable_mul_right_iff (h : a ≠ 0) : summable f ↔ summable (λb, f b * a) :=
⟨λ H, H.mul_right _, λ H, by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right' h] using H.mul_right a⁻¹⟩
lemma tsum_mul_left [t2_space α] : (∑' x, a * f x) = a * ∑' x, f x :=
if hf : summable f then hf.tsum_mul_left a
else if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha]
else by rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf,
tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (mt (summable_mul_left_iff ha).2 hf), mul_zero]
lemma tsum_mul_right [t2_space α] : (∑' x, f x * a) = (∑' x, f x) * a :=
if hf : summable f then hf.tsum_mul_right a
else if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha]
else by rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf,
tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (mt (summable_mul_right_iff ha).2 hf), zero_mul]
end division_ring
section order_topology
variables [ordered_add_comm_monoid α] [topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α]
variables {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum_le (h : ∀b, f b ≤ g b) (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hf hg $ assume s, sum_le_sum $ assume b _, h b
@[mono] lemma has_sum_mono (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) (h : f ≤ g) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
has_sum_le h hf hg
lemma has_sum_le_of_sum_le (hf : has_sum f a) (h : ∀ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b ≤ a₂) :
a ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto' hf h
lemma le_has_sum_of_le_sum (hf : has_sum f a) (h : ∀ s : finset β, a₂ ≤ ∑ b in s, f b) :
a₂ ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto' hf h
lemma has_sum_le_inj {g : γ → α} (i : β → γ) (hi : injective i) (hs : ∀c∉set.range i, 0 ≤ g c)
(h : ∀b, f b ≤ g (i b)) (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
have has_sum (λc, (partial_inv i c).cases_on' 0 f) a₁,
begin
refine (has_sum_iff_has_sum_of_ne_zero_bij (i ∘ coe) _ _ _).2 hf,
{ exact assume c₁ c₂ eq, hi eq },
{ intros c hc,
rw [mem_support] at hc,
cases eq : partial_inv i c with b; rw eq at hc,
{ contradiction },
{ rw [partial_inv_of_injective hi] at eq,
exact ⟨⟨b, hc⟩, eq⟩ } },
{ assume c, simp [partial_inv_left hi, option.cases_on'] }
end,
begin
refine has_sum_le (assume c, _) this hg,
by_cases c ∈ set.range i,
{ rcases h with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rw [partial_inv_left hi, option.cases_on'],
exact h _ },
{ have : partial_inv i c = none := dif_neg h,
rw [this, option.cases_on'],
exact hs _ h }
end
lemma tsum_le_tsum_of_inj {g : γ → α} (i : β → γ) (hi : injective i) (hs : ∀c∉set.range i, 0 ≤ g c)
(h : ∀b, f b ≤ g (i b)) (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : tsum f ≤ tsum g :=
has_sum_le_inj i hi hs h hf.has_sum hg.has_sum
lemma sum_le_has_sum (s : finset β) (hs : ∀ b∉s, 0 ≤ f b) (hf : has_sum f a) :
∑ b in s, f b ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto hf (eventually_at_top.2 ⟨s, λ t hst,
sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg hst $ λ b hbt hbs, hs b hbs⟩)
lemma is_lub_has_sum (h : ∀ b, 0 ≤ f b) (hf : has_sum f a) :
is_lub (set.range (λ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b)) a :=
is_lub_of_tendsto (finset.sum_mono_set_of_nonneg h) hf
lemma le_has_sum (hf : has_sum f a) (b : β) (hb : ∀ b' ≠ b, 0 ≤ f b') : f b ≤ a :=
calc f b = ∑ b in {b}, f b : finset.sum_singleton.symm
... ≤ a : sum_le_has_sum _ (by { convert hb, simp }) hf
lemma sum_le_tsum {f : β → α} (s : finset β) (hs : ∀ b∉s, 0 ≤ f b) (hf : summable f) :
∑ b in s, f b ≤ ∑' b, f b :=
sum_le_has_sum s hs hf.has_sum
lemma le_tsum (hf : summable f) (b : β) (hb : ∀ b' ≠ b, 0 ≤ f b') : f b ≤ ∑' b, f b :=
le_has_sum (summable.has_sum hf) b hb
lemma tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀b, f b ≤ g b) (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) : ∑'b, f b ≤ ∑'b, g b :=
has_sum_le h hf.has_sum hg.has_sum
@[mono] lemma tsum_mono (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) (h : f ≤ g) :
∑' n, f n ≤ ∑' n, g n :=
tsum_le_tsum h hf hg
lemma tsum_le_of_sum_le (hf : summable f) (h : ∀ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b ≤ a₂) :
∑' b, f b ≤ a₂ :=
has_sum_le_of_sum_le hf.has_sum h
lemma tsum_le_of_sum_le' (ha₂ : 0 ≤ a₂) (h : ∀ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b ≤ a₂) :
∑' b, f b ≤ a₂ :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ exact tsum_le_of_sum_le hf h },
{ rw tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf,
exact ha₂ }
end
lemma has_sum.nonneg (h : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) (ha : has_sum g a) : 0 ≤ a :=
has_sum_le h has_sum_zero ha
lemma has_sum.nonpos (h : ∀ b, g b ≤ 0) (ha : has_sum g a) : a ≤ 0 :=
has_sum_le h ha has_sum_zero
lemma tsum_nonneg (h : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) : 0 ≤ ∑'b, g b :=
begin
by_cases hg : summable g,
{ exact hg.has_sum.nonneg h },
{ simp [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hg] }
end
lemma tsum_nonpos (h : ∀ b, f b ≤ 0) : ∑'b, f b ≤ 0 :=
begin
by_cases hf : summable f,
{ exact hf.has_sum.nonpos h },
{ simp [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf] }
end
end order_topology
section ordered_topological_group
variables [ordered_add_comm_group α] [topological_space α] [topological_add_group α]
[order_closed_topology α] {f g : β → α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma has_sum_lt {i : β} (h : ∀ (b : β), f b ≤ g b) (hi : f i < g i)
(hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) :
a₁ < a₂ :=
have update f i 0 ≤ update g i 0 := update_le_update_iff.mpr ⟨rfl.le, λ i _, h i⟩,
have 0 - f i + a₁ ≤ 0 - g i + a₂ := has_sum_le this (hf.update i 0) (hg.update i 0),
by simpa only [zero_sub, add_neg_cancel_left] using add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hi this
@[mono] lemma has_sum_strict_mono (hf : has_sum f a₁) (hg : has_sum g a₂) (h : f < g) : a₁ < a₂ :=
let ⟨hle, i, hi⟩ := pi.lt_def.mp h in has_sum_lt hle hi hf hg
lemma tsum_lt_tsum {i : β} (h : ∀ (b : β), f b ≤ g b) (hi : f i < g i)
(hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) :
∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
has_sum_lt h hi hf.has_sum hg.has_sum
@[mono] lemma tsum_strict_mono (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g) (h : f < g) :
∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
let ⟨hle, i, hi⟩ := pi.lt_def.mp h in tsum_lt_tsum hle hi hf hg
lemma tsum_pos (hsum : summable g) (hg : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) (i : β) (hi : 0 < g i) :
0 < ∑' b, g b :=
by { rw ← tsum_zero, exact tsum_lt_tsum hg hi summable_zero hsum }
end ordered_topological_group
section canonically_ordered
variables [canonically_ordered_add_monoid α] [topological_space α] [order_closed_topology α]
variables {f : β → α} {a : α}
lemma le_has_sum' (hf : has_sum f a) (b : β) : f b ≤ a :=
le_has_sum hf b $ λ _ _, zero_le _
lemma le_tsum' (hf : summable f) (b : β) : f b ≤ ∑' b, f b :=
le_tsum hf b $ λ _ _, zero_le _
lemma has_sum_zero_iff : has_sum f 0 ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, _⟩,
{ contrapose!,
exact λ ⟨x, hx⟩ h, irrefl _ (lt_of_lt_of_le (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) (le_has_sum' h x)) },
{ convert has_sum_zero,
exact funext h }
end
lemma tsum_eq_zero_iff (hf : summable f) : ∑' i, f i = 0 ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 :=
by rw [←has_sum_zero_iff, hf.has_sum_iff]
lemma tsum_ne_zero_iff (hf : summable f) : ∑' i, f i ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ x, f x ≠ 0 :=
by rw [ne.def, tsum_eq_zero_iff hf, not_forall]
lemma is_lub_has_sum' (hf : has_sum f a) : is_lub (set.range (λ s : finset β, ∑ b in s, f b)) a :=
is_lub_of_tendsto (finset.sum_mono_set f) hf
end canonically_ordered
section uniform_group
variables [add_comm_group α] [uniform_space α]
lemma summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset [complete_space α] {f : β → α} :
summable f ↔ cauchy_seq (λ (s : finset β), ∑ b in s, f b) :=
cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto.symm
variables [uniform_add_group α] {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing :
cauchy_seq (λ (s : finset β), ∑ b in s, f b)
↔ ∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (0:α), (∃s:finset β, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∑ b in t, f b ∈ e) :=
begin
simp only [cauchy_seq, cauchy_map_iff, and_iff_right at_top_ne_bot,
prod_at_top_at_top_eq, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero α, tendsto_comap_iff, (∘)],
rw [tendsto_at_top'],
split,
{ assume h e he,
rcases h e he with ⟨⟨s₁, s₂⟩, h⟩,
use [s₁ ∪ s₂],
assume t ht,
specialize h (s₁ ∪ s₂, (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ t) ⟨le_sup_left, le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_right⟩,
simpa only [finset.sum_union ht.symm, add_sub_cancel'] using h },
{ assume h e he,
rcases exists_nhds_half_neg he with ⟨d, hd, hde⟩,
rcases h d hd with ⟨s, h⟩,
use [(s, s)],
rintros ⟨t₁, t₂⟩ ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩,
have : ∑ b in t₂, f b - ∑ b in t₁, f b = ∑ b in t₂ \ s, f b - ∑ b in t₁ \ s, f b,
{ simp only [(finset.sum_sdiff ht₁).symm, (finset.sum_sdiff ht₂).symm,
add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] },
simp only [this],
exact hde _ (h _ finset.sdiff_disjoint) _ (h _ finset.sdiff_disjoint) }
end
variable [complete_space α]
lemma summable_iff_vanishing :
summable f ↔ ∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (0:α), (∃s:finset β, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∑ b in t, f b ∈ e) :=
by rw [summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing]
/- TODO: generalize to monoid with a uniform continuous subtraction operator: `(a + b) - b = a` -/
lemma summable.summable_of_eq_zero_or_self (hf : summable f) (h : ∀b, g b = 0 ∨ g b = f b) :
summable g :=
summable_iff_vanishing.2 $
assume e he,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := summable_iff_vanishing.1 hf e he in
⟨s, assume t ht,
have eq : ∑ b in t.filter (λb, g b = f b), f b = ∑ b in t, g b :=
calc ∑ b in t.filter (λb, g b = f b), f b = ∑ b in t.filter (λb, g b = f b), g b :
finset.sum_congr rfl (assume b hb, (finset.mem_filter.1 hb).2.symm)
... = ∑ b in t, g b :
begin
refine finset.sum_subset (finset.filter_subset _ _) _,
assume b hbt hb,
simp only [(∉), finset.mem_filter, and_iff_right hbt] at hb,
exact (h b).resolve_right hb
end,
eq ▸ hs _ $ finset.disjoint_of_subset_left (finset.filter_subset _ _) ht⟩
protected lemma summable.indicator (hf : summable f) (s : set β) :
summable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.summable_of_eq_zero_or_self $ set.indicator_eq_zero_or_self _ _
lemma summable.comp_injective {i : γ → β} (hf : summable f) (hi : injective i) :
summable (f ∘ i) :=
begin
simpa only [set.indicator_range_comp]
using (hi.summable_iff _).2 (hf.indicator (set.range i)),
exact λ x hx, set.indicator_of_not_mem hx _
end
lemma summable.subtype (hf : summable f) (s : set β) : summable (f ∘ coe : s → α) :=
hf.comp_injective subtype.coe_injective
lemma summable_subtype_and_compl {s : set β} :
summable (λ x : s, f x) ∧ summable (λ x : sᶜ, f x) ↔ summable f :=
⟨and_imp.2 summable.add_compl, λ h, ⟨h.subtype s, h.subtype sᶜ⟩⟩
lemma summable.sigma_factor {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(ha : summable f) (b : β) : summable (λc, f ⟨b, c⟩) :=
ha.comp_injective sigma_mk_injective
lemma summable.sigma [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(ha : summable f) : summable (λb, ∑'c, f ⟨b, c⟩) :=
ha.sigma' (λ b, ha.sigma_factor b)
lemma summable.prod_factor {f : β × γ → α} (h : summable f) (b : β) :
summable (λ c, f (b, c)) :=
h.comp_injective $ λ c₁ c₂ h, (prod.ext_iff.1 h).2
lemma tsum_sigma [regular_space α] {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σb:β, γ b) → α}
(ha : summable f) : ∑'p, f p = ∑'b c, f ⟨b, c⟩ :=
tsum_sigma' (λ b, ha.sigma_factor b) ha
lemma tsum_prod [regular_space α] {f : β × γ → α} (h : summable f) :
∑'p, f p = ∑'b c, f ⟨b, c⟩ :=
tsum_prod' h h.prod_factor
lemma tsum_comm [regular_space α] {f : β → γ → α} (h : summable (function.uncurry f)) :
∑' c b, f b c = ∑' b c, f b c :=
tsum_comm' h h.prod_factor h.prod_symm.prod_factor
end uniform_group
section topological_group
variables {G : Type*} [topological_space G] [add_comm_group G] [topological_add_group G]
{f : α → G}
lemma summable.vanishing (hf : summable f) ⦃e : set G⦄ (he : e ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G)) :
∃ s : finset α, ∀ t, disjoint t s → ∑ k in t, f k ∈ e :=
begin
letI : uniform_space G := topological_add_group.to_uniform_space G,
letI : uniform_add_group G := topological_add_group_is_uniform,
rcases hf with ⟨y, hy⟩,
exact cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing.1 hy.cauchy_seq e he
end
/-- Series divergence test: if `f` is a convergent series, then `f x` tends to zero along
`cofinite`. -/
lemma summable.tendsto_cofinite_zero (hf : summable f) : tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 0) :=
begin
intros e he,
rw [filter.mem_map],
rcases hf.vanishing he with ⟨s, hs⟩,
refine s.eventually_cofinite_nmem.mono (λ x hx, _),
by simpa using hs {x} (singleton_disjoint.2 hx)
end
lemma summable.tendsto_at_top_zero {f : ℕ → G} (hf : summable f) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw ←nat.cofinite_eq_at_top, exact hf.tendsto_cofinite_zero }
lemma summable.tendsto_top_of_pos {α : Type*}
[linear_ordered_field α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α] {f : ℕ → α}
(hf : summable f⁻¹) (hf' : ∀ n, 0 < f n) : tendsto f at_top at_top :=
begin
rw [show f = f⁻¹⁻¹, by { ext, simp }],
apply filter.tendsto.inv_tendsto_zero,
apply tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _
(summable.tendsto_at_top_zero hf),
rw eventually_iff_exists_mem,
refine ⟨set.Ioi 0, Ioi_mem_at_top _, λ _ _, _⟩,
rw [set.mem_Ioi, inv_eq_one_div, one_div, pi.inv_apply, _root_.inv_pos],
exact hf' _,
end
end topological_group
section linear_order
/-! For infinite sums taking values in a linearly ordered monoid, the existence of a least upper
bound for the finite sums is a criterion for summability.
This criterion is useful when applied in a linearly ordered monoid which is also a complete or
conditionally complete linear order, such as `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, `ℝ≥0∞`, because it is then easy to check
the existence of a least upper bound.
-/
lemma has_sum_of_is_lub_of_nonneg [linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid β] [topological_space β]
[order_topology β] {f : α → β} (b : β) (h : ∀ b, 0 ≤ f b)
(hf : is_lub (set.range (λ s, ∑ a in s, f a)) b) :
has_sum f b :=
tendsto_at_top_is_lub (finset.sum_mono_set_of_nonneg h) hf
lemma has_sum_of_is_lub [canonically_linear_ordered_add_monoid β] [topological_space β]
[order_topology β] {f : α → β} (b : β) (hf : is_lub (set.range (λ s, ∑ a in s, f a)) b) :
has_sum f b :=
tendsto_at_top_is_lub (finset.sum_mono_set f) hf
lemma summable_abs_iff [linear_ordered_add_comm_group β] [uniform_space β]
[uniform_add_group β] [complete_space β] {f : α → β} :
summable (λ x, abs (f x)) ↔ summable f :=
have h1 : ∀ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}, abs (f x) = f x := λ x, abs_of_nonneg x.2,
have h2 : ∀ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, abs (f x) = -f x := λ x, abs_of_neg (not_le.1 x.2),
calc summable (λ x, abs (f x)) ↔
summable (λ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}, abs (f x)) ∧ summable (λ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, abs (f x)) :
summable_subtype_and_compl.symm
... ↔ summable (λ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x) ∧ summable (λ x : {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, -f x) :
by simp only [h1, h2]
... ↔ _ : by simp only [summable_neg_iff, summable_subtype_and_compl]
alias summable_abs_iff ↔ summable.of_abs summable.abs
end linear_order
section cauchy_seq
open finset.Ico filter
/-- If the extended distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated
by a summable series of `nnreal`s, then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_summable [pseudo_emetric_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ≥0)
(hf : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : summable d) : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
refine emetric.cauchy_seq_iff_nnreal.2 (λ ε εpos, _),
-- Actually we need partial sums of `d` to be a Cauchy sequence
replace hd : cauchy_seq (λ (n : ℕ), ∑ x in range n, d x) :=
let ⟨_, H⟩ := hd in H.tendsto_sum_nat.cauchy_seq,
-- Now we take the same `N` as in one of the definitions of a Cauchy sequence
refine (metric.cauchy_seq_iff'.1 hd ε (nnreal.coe_pos.2 εpos)).imp (λ N hN n hn, _),
have hsum := hN n hn,
-- We simplify the known inequality
rw [dist_nndist, nnreal.nndist_eq, ← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ hn, nnreal.add_sub_cancel'] at hsum,
norm_cast at hsum,
replace hsum := lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hsum,
rw edist_comm,
-- Then use `hf` to simplify the goal to the same form
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le hn (λ k _ _, hf k)),
assumption_mod_cast
end
/-- If the distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated by a summable series,
then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ)
(hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : summable d) : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
refine metric.cauchy_seq_iff'.2 (λε εpos, _),
replace hd : cauchy_seq (λ (n : ℕ), ∑ x in range n, d x) :=
let ⟨_, H⟩ := hd in H.tendsto_sum_nat.cauchy_seq,
refine (metric.cauchy_seq_iff'.1 hd ε εpos).imp (λ N hN n hn, _),
have hsum := hN n hn,
rw [real.dist_eq, ← sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hn] at hsum,
calc dist (f n) (f N) = dist (f N) (f n) : dist_comm _ _
... ≤ ∑ x in Ico N n, d x : dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le hn (λ k _ _, hf k)
... ≤ abs (∑ x in Ico N n, d x) : le_abs_self _
... < ε : hsum
end
lemma cauchy_seq_of_summable_dist [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λn, dist (f n) (f n.succ))) : cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ (λ _, le_refl _) h
lemma dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ)
(hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : summable d) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a))
(n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, d (n + m) :=
begin
refine le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.dist ha)
(eventually_at_top.2 ⟨n, λ m hnm, _⟩),
refine le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le hnm (λ k _ _, hf k)) _,
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sum_range],
refine sum_le_tsum (range _) (λ _ _, le_trans dist_nonneg (hf _)) _,
exact hd.comp_injective (add_right_injective n)
end
lemma dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α} (d : ℕ → ℝ)
(hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n) (hd : summable d) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ tsum d :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto d hf hd ha 0
lemma dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λn, dist (f n) (f n.succ))) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n) :
dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, dist (f (n+m)) (f (n+m).succ) :=
show dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, (λx, dist (f x) (f x.succ)) (n + m), from
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (λ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ)) (λ _, le_refl _) h ha n
lemma dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀ [pseudo_metric_space α] {f : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λn, dist (f n) (f n.succ))) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ ∑' n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) :=
by simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto h ha 0
end cauchy_seq
/-! ## Multipliying two infinite sums
In this section, we prove various results about `(∑' x : β, f x) * (∑' y : γ, g y)`. Not that we
always assume that the family `λ x : β × γ, f x.1 * g x.2` is summable, since there is no way to
deduce this from the summmabilities of `f` and `g` in general, but if you are working in a normed
space, you may want to use the analogous lemmas in `analysis/normed_space/basic`
(e.g `tsum_mul_tsum_of_summable_norm`).
We first establish results about arbitrary index types, `β` and `γ`, and then we specialize to
`β = γ = ℕ` to prove the Cauchy product formula (see `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal`).
### Arbitrary index types
-/
section tsum_mul_tsum
variables [topological_space α] [regular_space α] [semiring α] [topological_ring α]
{f : β → α} {g : γ → α} {s t u : α}
lemma has_sum.mul_eq (hf : has_sum f s) (hg : has_sum g t)
(hfg : has_sum (λ (x : β × γ), f x.1 * g x.2) u) :
s * t = u :=
have key₁ : has_sum (λ b, f b * t) (s * t),
from hf.mul_right t,
have this : ∀ b : β, has_sum (λ c : γ, f b * g c) (f b * t),
from λ b, hg.mul_left (f b),
have key₂ : has_sum (λ b, f b * t) u,
from has_sum.prod_fiberwise hfg this,
key₁.unique key₂
lemma has_sum.mul (hf : has_sum f s) (hg : has_sum g t)
(hfg : summable (λ (x : β × γ), f x.1 * g x.2)) :
has_sum (λ (x : β × γ), f x.1 * g x.2) (s * t) :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hfg in
(hf.mul_eq hg hu).symm ▸ hu
/-- Product of two infinites sums indexed by arbitrary types.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum_of_summable_norm` if `f` and `g` are abolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g)
(hfg : summable (λ (x : β × γ), f x.1 * g x.2)) :
(∑' x, f x) * (∑' y, g y) = (∑' z : β × γ, f z.1 * g z.2) :=
hf.has_sum.mul_eq hg.has_sum hfg.has_sum
end tsum_mul_tsum
section cauchy_product
/-! ### `ℕ`-indexed families (Cauchy product)
We prove two versions of the Cauchy product formula. The first one is
`tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range`, where the `n`-th term is a sum over `finset.range (n+1)`
involving `nat` substraction.
In order to avoid `nat` substraction, we also provide `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal`,
where the `n`-th term is a sum over all pairs `(k, l)` such that `k+l=n`, which corresponds to the
`finset` `finset.nat.antidiagonal n` -/
variables {f : ℕ → α} {g : ℕ → α}
open finset
variables [topological_space α] [semiring α]
/- The family `(k, l) : ℕ × ℕ ↦ f k * g l` is summable if and only if the family
`(n, k, l) : Σ (n : ℕ), nat.antidiagonal n ↦ f k * g l` is summable. -/
lemma summable_mul_prod_iff_summable_mul_sigma_antidiagonal {f g : ℕ → α} :
summable (λ x : ℕ × ℕ, f x.1 * g x.2) ↔
summable (λ x : (Σ (n : ℕ), nat.antidiagonal n), f (x.2 : ℕ × ℕ).1 * g (x.2 : ℕ × ℕ).2) :=
nat.sigma_antidiagonal_equiv_prod.summable_iff.symm
variables [regular_space α] [topological_ring α]
lemma summable_sum_mul_antidiagonal_of_summable_mul {f g : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λ x : ℕ × ℕ, f x.1 * g x.2)) :
summable (λ n, ∑ kl in nat.antidiagonal n, f kl.1 * g kl.2) :=
begin
rw summable_mul_prod_iff_summable_mul_sigma_antidiagonal at h,
conv {congr, funext, rw [← finset.sum_finset_coe, ← tsum_fintype]},
exact h.sigma' (λ n, (has_sum_fintype _).summable),
end
/-- The Cauchy product formula for the product of two infinites sums indexed by `ℕ`,
expressed by summing on `finset.nat.antidiagonal`.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal_of_summable_norm`
if `f` and `g` are absolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g)
(hfg : summable (λ (x : ℕ × ℕ), f x.1 * g x.2)) :
(∑' n, f n) * (∑' n, g n) = (∑' n, ∑ kl in nat.antidiagonal n, f kl.1 * g kl.2) :=
begin
conv_rhs {congr, funext, rw [← finset.sum_finset_coe, ← tsum_fintype]},
rw [tsum_mul_tsum hf hg hfg, ← nat.sigma_antidiagonal_equiv_prod.tsum_eq (_ : ℕ × ℕ → α)],
exact tsum_sigma' (λ n, (has_sum_fintype _).summable)
(summable_mul_prod_iff_summable_mul_sigma_antidiagonal.mp hfg)
end
lemma summable_sum_mul_range_of_summable_mul {f g : ℕ → α}
(h : summable (λ x : ℕ × ℕ, f x.1 * g x.2)) :
summable (λ n, ∑ k in range (n+1), f k * g (n - k)) :=
begin
simp_rw ← nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ (λ k l, f k * g l),
exact summable_sum_mul_antidiagonal_of_summable_mul h
end
/-- The Cauchy product formula for the product of two infinites sums indexed by `ℕ`,
expressed by summing on `finset.range`.
See also `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range_of_summable_norm`
if `f` and `g` are absolutely summable. -/
lemma tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_range (hf : summable f) (hg : summable g)
(hfg : summable (λ (x : ℕ × ℕ), f x.1 * g x.2)) :
(∑' n, f n) * (∑' n, g n) = (∑' n, ∑ k in range (n+1), f k * g (n - k)) :=
begin
simp_rw ← nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ (λ k l, f k * g l),
exact tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal hf hg hfg
end
end cauchy_product
|
459adb158aa750bfa68c610848c1204e485fbc1f | e00ea76a720126cf9f6d732ad6216b5b824d20a7 | /src/data/set/finite.lean | 4bf6f76b83de910a5983a3ceaea36910542ac72a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | vaibhavkarve/mathlib | a574aaf68c0a431a47fa82ce0637f0f769826bfe | 17f8340912468f49bdc30acdb9a9fa02eeb0473a | refs/heads/master | 1,621,263,802,637 | 1,585,399,588,000 | 1,585,399,588,000 | 250,833,447 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,585,410,341,000 | 1,585,410,341,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,864 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Finite sets.
-/
import logic.function
import data.nat.basic data.fintype data.set.lattice data.set.function
import algebra.big_operators
open set function
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace set
/-- A set is finite if the subtype is a fintype, i.e. there is a
list that enumerates its members. -/
def finite (s : set α) : Prop := nonempty (fintype s)
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite. -/
def infinite (s : set α) : Prop := ¬ finite s
/-- The subtype corresponding to a finite set is a finite type. Note
that because `finite` isn't a typeclass, this will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
noncomputable def finite.fintype {s : set α} (h : finite s) : fintype s :=
classical.choice h
/-- Get a finset from a finite set -/
noncomputable def finite.to_finset {s : set α} (h : finite s) : finset α :=
@set.to_finset _ _ (finite.fintype h)
@[simp] theorem finite.mem_to_finset {s : set α} {h : finite s} {a : α} : a ∈ h.to_finset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_to_finset _ _ (finite.fintype h) _
lemma finite.coe_to_finset {α} {s : set α} (h : finite s) : ↑h.to_finset = s :=
by { ext, apply mem_to_finset }
theorem finite.exists_finset {s : set α} : finite s →
∃ s' : finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s
| ⟨h⟩ := by exactI ⟨to_finset s, λ _, mem_to_finset⟩
theorem finite.exists_finset_coe {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
∃ s' : finset α, ↑s' = s :=
⟨hs.to_finset, hs.coe_to_finset⟩
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : can_lift (set α) (finset α) :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := finite,
prf := λ s hs, hs.exists_finset_coe }
theorem finite_mem_finset (s : finset α) : finite {a | a ∈ s} :=
⟨fintype.of_finset s (λ _, iff.rfl)⟩
theorem finite.of_fintype [fintype α] (s : set α) : finite s :=
by classical; exact ⟨set_fintype s⟩
/-- Membership of a subset of a finite type is decidable.
Using this as an instance leads to potential loops with `subtype.fintype` under certain decidability
assumptions, so it should only be declared a local instance. -/
def decidable_mem_of_fintype [decidable_eq α] (s : set α) [fintype s] (a) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
decidable_of_iff _ mem_to_finset
instance fintype_empty : fintype (∅ : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ∅ $ by simp
theorem empty_card : fintype.card (∅ : set α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_card' {h : fintype.{u} (∅ : set α)} :
@fintype.card (∅ : set α) h = 0 :=
eq.trans (by congr) empty_card
@[simp] theorem finite_empty : @finite α ∅ := ⟨set.fintype_empty⟩
def fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) : fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨a :: s.to_finset.1,
multiset.nodup_cons_of_nodup (by simp [h]) s.to_finset.2⟩ $ by simp
theorem card_fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
@fintype.card _ (fintype_insert' s h) = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw [fintype_insert', fintype.card_of_finset];
simp [finset.card, to_finset]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_insert {a : α} (s : set α)
[fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) {d : fintype.{u} (insert a s : set α)} :
@fintype.card _ d = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw ← card_fintype_insert' s h; congr
lemma card_image_of_inj_on {s : set α} [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
calc fintype.card (f '' s) = (s.to_finset.image f).card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... = s.to_finset.card : finset.card_image_of_inj_on
(λ x hx y hy hxy, H x (mem_to_finset.1 hx) y (mem_to_finset.1 hy) hxy)
... = fintype.card s : (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ a, mem_to_finset)).symm
lemma card_image_of_injective (s : set α) [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : function.injective f) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
card_image_of_inj_on $ λ _ _ _ _ h, H h
section
local attribute [instance] decidable_mem_of_fintype
instance fintype_insert [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : set α) [fintype s] : fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then by rwa [insert_eq, union_eq_self_of_subset_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 h)]
else fintype_insert' _ h
end
@[simp] theorem finite_insert (a : α) {s : set α} : finite s → finite (insert a s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_insert _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ h⟩
lemma to_finset_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
(finite_insert a hs).to_finset = insert a hs.to_finset :=
finset.ext.mpr $ by simp
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.induction_on {C : set α → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅) (H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → finite s → C s → C (insert a s)) : C s :=
let ⟨t⟩ := h in by exactI
match s.to_finset, @mem_to_finset _ s _ with
| ⟨l, nd⟩, al := begin
change ∀ a, a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ s at al,
clear _let_match _match t h, revert s nd al,
refine multiset.induction_on l _ (λ a l IH, _); intros s nd al,
{ rw show s = ∅, from eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (by simpa using al),
exact H0 },
{ rw ← show insert a {x | x ∈ l} = s, from set.ext (by simpa using al),
cases multiset.nodup_cons.1 nd with m nd',
refine H1 _ ⟨finset.subtype.fintype ⟨l, nd'⟩⟩ (IH nd' (λ _, iff.rfl)),
exact m }
end
end
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.dinduction_on {C : ∀s:set α, finite s → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅ finite_empty)
(H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → ∀h:finite s, C s h → C (insert a s) (finite_insert a h)) :
C s h :=
have ∀h:finite s, C s h,
from finite.induction_on h (assume h, H0) (assume a s has hs ih h, H1 has hs (ih _)),
this h
instance fintype_singleton (a : α) : fintype ({a} : set α) :=
fintype_insert' _ (not_mem_empty _)
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) :
fintype.card ({a} : set α) = 1 :=
by rw [show fintype.card ({a} : set α) = _, from
card_fintype_insert' ∅ (not_mem_empty a)]; refl
@[simp] theorem finite_singleton (a : α) : finite ({a} : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_singleton _⟩
instance fintype_pure : ∀ a : α, fintype (pure a : set α) :=
set.fintype_singleton
theorem finite_pure (a : α) : finite (pure a : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_pure a⟩
instance fintype_univ [fintype α] : fintype (@univ α) :=
fintype.of_equiv α $ (equiv.set.univ α).symm
theorem finite_univ [fintype α] : finite (@univ α) := ⟨set.fintype_univ⟩
theorem infinite_univ_iff : (@univ α).infinite ↔ _root_.infinite α :=
⟨λ h₁, ⟨λ h₂, h₁ $ @finite_univ α h₂⟩,
λ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩, h₁ $ @fintype.of_equiv _ _ h₂ $ equiv.set.univ _⟩
theorem infinite_univ [h : _root_.infinite α] : infinite (@univ α) :=
infinite_univ_iff.2 h
instance fintype_union [decidable_eq α] (s t : set α) [fintype s] [fintype t] : fintype (s ∪ t : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset ∪ t.to_finset) $ by simp
theorem finite_union {s t : set α} : finite s → finite t → finite (s ∪ t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ hs ht⟩
instance fintype_sep (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) [fintype s] [decidable_pred p] : fintype ({a ∈ s | p a} : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.filter p) $ by simp
instance fintype_inter (s t : set α) [fintype s] [decidable_pred t] : fintype (s ∩ t : set α) :=
set.fintype_sep s t
def fintype_subset (s : set α) {t : set α} [fintype s] [decidable_pred t] (h : t ⊆ s) : fintype t :=
by rw ← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h; apply_instance
theorem finite_subset {s : set α} : finite s → ∀ {t : set α}, t ⊆ s → finite t
| ⟨hs⟩ t h := ⟨@set.fintype_subset _ _ _ hs (classical.dec_pred t) h⟩
instance fintype_image [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s] : fintype (f '' s) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.image f) $ by simp
instance fintype_range [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) [fintype α] : fintype (range f) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.image f) $ by simp [range]
theorem finite_range (f : α → β) [fintype α] : finite (range f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq β; exact ⟨by apply_instance⟩
theorem finite_image {s : set α} (f : α → β) : finite s → finite (f '' s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_image _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ _ h⟩
instance fintype_map {α β} [decidable_eq β] :
∀ (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s], fintype (f <$> s) := set.fintype_image
theorem finite_map {α β} {s : set α} :
∀ (f : α → β), finite s → finite (f <$> s) := finite_image
def fintype_of_fintype_image (s : set α)
{f : α → β} {g} (I : is_partial_inv f g) [fintype (f '' s)] : fintype s :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨_, @multiset.nodup_filter_map β α g _
(@injective_of_partial_inv_right _ _ f g I) (f '' s).to_finset.2⟩ $ λ a,
begin
suffices : (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s,
by simpa [exists_and_distrib_left.symm, and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc],
rw exists_swap,
suffices : (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s, {simpa [and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc]},
simp [I _, (injective_of_partial_inv I).eq_iff]
end
theorem finite_of_finite_image_on {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : set.inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) → finite s | ⟨h⟩ :=
⟨@fintype.of_injective _ _ h (λa:s, ⟨f a.1, mem_image_of_mem f a.2⟩) $
assume a b eq, subtype.eq $ hi a.2 b.2 $ subtype.ext.1 eq⟩
theorem finite_image_iff_on {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) ↔ finite s :=
⟨finite_of_finite_image_on hi, finite_image _⟩
theorem finite_of_finite_image {s : set α} {f : α → β} (I : set.inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) → finite s :=
finite_of_finite_image_on I
theorem finite_preimage {s : set β} {f : α → β}
(I : set.inj_on f (f⁻¹' s)) (h : finite s) : finite (f ⁻¹' s) :=
finite_of_finite_image I (finite_subset h (image_preimage_subset f s))
instance fintype_Union [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
(f : ι → set α) [∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.bind (λ i, (f i).to_finset)) $ by simp
theorem finite_Union {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {f : ι → set α} (H : ∀i, finite (f i)) : finite (⋃ i, f i) :=
⟨@set.fintype_Union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ _ (λ i, finite.fintype (H i))⟩
def fintype_bUnion [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) (H : ∀ i ∈ s, fintype (f i)) : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
by rw bUnion_eq_Union; exact
@set.fintype_Union _ _ _ _ _ (by rintro ⟨i, hi⟩; exact H i hi)
instance fintype_bUnion' [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) [H : ∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
fintype_bUnion _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite_sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : finite s) (H : ∀t∈s, finite t) : finite (⋃₀ s) :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union; haveI := finite.fintype h;
apply finite_Union; simpa using H
theorem finite_bUnion {α} {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} {f : ι → set α} :
finite s → (∀i, finite (f i)) → finite (⋃ i∈s, f i)
| ⟨hs⟩ h := by rw [bUnion_eq_Union]; exactI finite_Union (λ i, h _)
theorem finite_bUnion' {α} {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} (f : ι → set α) :
finite s → (∀i ∈ s, finite (f i)) → finite (⋃ i∈s, f i)
| ⟨hs⟩ h := by { rw [bUnion_eq_Union], exactI finite_Union (λ i, h i.1 i.2) }
instance fintype_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i < n} :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.range n) $ by simp
instance fintype_le_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i ≤ n} :=
by simpa [nat.lt_succ_iff] using set.fintype_lt_nat (n+1)
lemma finite_le_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i ≤ n} := ⟨set.fintype_le_nat _⟩
lemma finite_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i < n} := ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
instance fintype_prod (s : set α) (t : set β) [fintype s] [fintype t] : fintype (set.prod s t) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.product t.to_finset) $ by simp
lemma finite_prod {s : set α} {t : set β} : finite s → finite t → finite (set.prod s t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := by exactI ⟨set.fintype_prod s t⟩
def fintype_bind {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, fintype (f a)) : fintype (s >>= f) :=
set.fintype_bUnion _ H
instance fintype_bind' {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) [H : ∀ a, fintype (f a)] : fintype (s >>= f) :=
fintype_bind _ _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite_bind {α β} {s : set α} {f : α → set β} :
finite s → (∀ a ∈ s, finite (f a)) → finite (s >>= f)
| ⟨hs⟩ H := ⟨@fintype_bind _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ hs _ (λ a ha, (H a ha).fintype)⟩
instance fintype_seq {α β : Type u} [decidable_eq β]
(f : set (α → β)) (s : set α) [fintype f] [fintype s] :
fintype (f <*> s) :=
by rw seq_eq_bind_map; apply set.fintype_bind'
theorem finite_seq {α β : Type u} {f : set (α → β)} {s : set α} :
finite f → finite s → finite (f <*> s)
| ⟨hf⟩ ⟨hs⟩ := by { haveI := classical.dec_eq β, exactI ⟨set.fintype_seq _ _⟩ }
/-- There are finitely many subsets of a given finite set -/
lemma finite_subsets_of_finite {α : Type u} {a : set α} (h : finite a) : finite {b | b ⊆ a} :=
begin
-- we just need to translate the result, already known for finsets,
-- to the language of finite sets
let s := coe '' ((finset.powerset (finite.to_finset h)).to_set),
have : finite s := finite_image _ (finite_mem_finset _),
have : {b | b ⊆ a} ⊆ s :=
begin
assume b hb,
rw [set.mem_image],
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq] at hb,
let b' : finset α := finite.to_finset (finite_subset h hb),
have : b' ∈ (finset.powerset (finite.to_finset h)).to_set :=
show b' ∈ (finset.powerset (finite.to_finset h)),
by simp [b', finset.subset_iff]; exact hb,
have : coe b' = b := by ext; simp,
exact ⟨b', by assumption, by assumption⟩
end,
exact finite_subset ‹finite s› this
end
lemma exists_min [decidable_linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) (h1 : finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f a ≤ f b
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa only [exists_prop, finite.mem_to_finset]
using (finite.to_finset h1).exists_min f ⟨x, finite.mem_to_finset.2 hx⟩
end set
namespace finset
variables [decidable_eq β]
variables {s t u : finset α} {f : α → β} {a : α}
lemma finite_to_set (s : finset α) : set.finite (↑s : set α) :=
set.finite_mem_finset s
@[simp] lemma coe_bind {f : α → finset β} : ↑(s.bind f) = (⋃x ∈ (↑s : set α), ↑(f x) : set β) :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_to_finset {s : set α} {hs : set.finite s} : ↑(hs.to_finset) = s :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_to_finset' (s : set α) [fintype s] : (↑s.to_finset : set α) = s :=
by ext; simp
end finset
namespace set
lemma finite_subset_Union {s : set α} (hs : finite s)
{ι} {t : ι → set α} (h : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i) : ∃ I : set ι, finite I ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i :=
begin
unfreezeI, cases hs,
choose f hf using show ∀ x : s, ∃ i, x.1 ∈ t i, {simpa [subset_def] using h},
refine ⟨range f, finite_range f, _⟩,
rintro x hx,
simp,
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx, hf _⟩⟩,
end
lemma finite_range_ite {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {f g : α → β} (hf : finite (range f))
(hg : finite (range g)) : finite (range (λ x, if p x then f x else g x)) :=
finite_subset (finite_union hf hg) range_ite_subset
lemma finite_range_const {c : β} : finite (range (λ x : α, c)) :=
finite_subset (finite_singleton c) range_const_subset
lemma range_find_greatest_subset {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ}:
range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b) ⊆ ↑(finset.range (b + 1)) :=
by { rw range_subset_iff, assume x, simp [nat.lt_succ_iff, nat.find_greatest_le] }
lemma finite_range_find_greatest {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ} :
finite (range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b)) :=
finite_subset (finset.finite_to_set $ finset.range (b + 1)) range_find_greatest_subset
lemma card_lt_card {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (h : s ⊂ t) :
fintype.card s < fintype.card t :=
begin
haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
rw [← finset.coe_to_finset' s, ← finset.coe_to_finset' t, finset.coe_ssubset] at h,
rw [fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ x, mem_to_finset),
fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ x, mem_to_finset)],
exact finset.card_lt_card h,
end
lemma card_le_of_subset {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (hsub : s ⊆ t) :
fintype.card s ≤ fintype.card t :=
calc fintype.card s = s.to_finset.card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... ≤ t.to_finset.card : finset.card_le_of_subset (λ x hx, by simp [set.subset_def, *] at *)
... = fintype.card t : eq.symm (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp))
lemma eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t]
(hsub : s ⊆ t) (hcard : fintype.card t ≤ fintype.card s) : s = t :=
(eq_or_ssubset_of_subset hsub).elim id
(λ h, absurd hcard $ not_le_of_lt $ card_lt_card h)
lemma card_range_of_injective [fintype α] {f : α → β} (hf : injective f)
[fintype (range f)] : fintype.card (range f) = fintype.card α :=
eq.symm $ fintype.card_congr (@equiv.of_bijective _ _ (λ a : α, show range f, from ⟨f a, a, rfl⟩)
⟨λ x y h, hf $ subtype.mk.inj h, λ b, let ⟨a, ha⟩ := b.2 in ⟨a, by simp *⟩⟩)
lemma finite.exists_maximal_wrt [partial_order β] (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : set.finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃a∈s, ∀a'∈s, f a ≤ f a' → f a = f a' :=
begin
classical,
refine h.induction_on _ _,
{ assume h, exact absurd h empty_not_nonempty },
assume a s his _ ih _,
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ use a, simp [h] },
rcases ih h with ⟨b, hb, ih⟩,
by_cases f b ≤ f a,
{ refine ⟨a, set.mem_insert _ _, assume c hc hac, le_antisymm hac _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ refl },
{ rwa [← ih c hcs (le_trans h hac)] } },
{ refine ⟨b, set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hb, assume c hc hbc, _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ exact (h hbc).elim },
{ exact ih c hcs hbc } }
end
section
local attribute [instance, priority 1] classical.prop_decidable
lemma to_finset_card {α : Type*} [fintype α] (H : set α) :
H.to_finset.card = fintype.card H :=
multiset.card_map subtype.val finset.univ.val
lemma to_finset_inter {α : Type*} [fintype α] (s t : set α) [decidable_eq α] :
(s ∩ t).to_finset = s.to_finset ∩ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
end
section
variables [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded above.-/
lemma bdd_above_finite (hs : finite s) : bdd_above s :=
finite.induction_on hs bdd_above_empty $ λ a s _ _ h, h.insert a
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded above is still bounded above.-/
lemma bdd_above_finite_union {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_above (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_above (S i)) :=
finite.induction_on H
(by simp only [bUnion_empty, bdd_above_empty, ball_empty_iff])
(λ a s ha _ hs, by simp only [bUnion_insert, ball_insert_iff, bdd_above_union, hs])
end
section
variables [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded below.-/
lemma bdd_below_finite (hs : finite s) : bdd_below s :=
finite.induction_on hs bdd_below_empty $ λ a s _ _ h, h.insert a
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded below is still bounded below.-/
lemma bdd_below_finite_union {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_below (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_below (S i)) :=
@bdd_above_finite_union (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ H
end
end set
namespace finset
section preimage
noncomputable def preimage {f : α → β} (s : finset β)
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) : finset α :=
set.finite.to_finset (set.finite_preimage hf (set.finite_mem_finset s))
@[simp] lemma mem_preimage {f : α → β} {s : finset β} {hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)} {x : α} :
x ∈ preimage s hf ↔ f x ∈ s :=
by simp [preimage]
@[simp] lemma coe_preimage {f : α → β} (s : finset β)
(hf : set.inj_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s)) : (↑(preimage s hf) : set α) = f ⁻¹' ↑s :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
lemma image_preimage [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (s : finset β)
(hf : set.bij_on f (f ⁻¹' s.to_set) s.to_set) :
image f (preimage s hf.inj_on) = s :=
finset.coe_inj.1 $
suffices f '' (f ⁻¹' ↑s) = ↑s, by simpa,
(set.subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset _ _) hf.2.2)
end preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage [comm_monoid β] (f : α → γ) (s : finset γ)
(hf : set.bij_on f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : γ → β) :
(preimage s hf.inj_on).prod (g ∘ f) = s.prod g :=
by classical;
calc
(preimage s hf.inj_on).prod (g ∘ f)
= (image f (preimage s hf.inj_on)).prod g :
begin
rw prod_image,
intros x hx y hy hxy,
apply hf.inj_on,
repeat { try { rw mem_preimage at hx hy,
rw [set.mem_preimage, mem_coe] },
assumption },
end
... = s.prod g : by rw [image_preimage]
end finset
lemma fintype.exists_max [fintype α] [nonempty α]
{β : Type*} [linear_order β] (f : α → β) :
∃ x₀ : α, ∀ x, f x ≤ f x₀ :=
begin
rcases set.finite_univ.exists_maximal_wrt f _ univ_nonempty with ⟨x, _, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, λ y, (le_total (f x) (f y)).elim (λ h, ge_of_eq $ hx _ trivial h) id⟩
end
|
86b0dc35c40fe2a7191cc873c3090d56cdfdd239 | 66a6486e19b71391cc438afee5f081a4257564ec | /property.hlean | 65213a1b1694c063555d71efa58c21faf221e460 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | spiceghello/Spectral | c8ccd1e32d4b6a9132ccee20fcba44b477cd0331 | 20023aa3de27c22ab9f9b4a177f5a1efdec2b19f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,263,374,078 | 1,523,349,717,000 | 1,523,349,717,000 | 92,312,239 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,495,642,470,000 | 1,495,642,470,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,504 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import types.trunc .logic
open funext eq trunc is_trunc logic
definition property (X : Type) := X → Prop
namespace property
variable {X : Type}
/- membership and subproperty -/
definition mem (x : X) (a : property X) := a x
infix ∈ := mem
notation a ∉ b := ¬ mem a b
/-theorem ext {a b : property X} (H : ∀x, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b) : a = b :=
eq_of_homotopy (take x, propext (H x))
-/
definition subproperty (a b : property X) : Prop := Prop.mk (∀⦃x⦄, x ∈ a → x ∈ b) _
infix ⊆ := subproperty
definition superproperty (s t : property X) : Prop := t ⊆ s
infix ⊇ := superproperty
theorem subproperty.refl (a : property X) : a ⊆ a := take x, assume H, H
theorem subproperty.trans {a b c : property X} (subab : a ⊆ b) (subbc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c :=
take x, assume ax, subbc (subab ax)
/-
theorem subproperty.antisymm {a b : property X} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
ext (λ x, iff.intro (λ ina, h₁ ina) (λ inb, h₂ inb))
-/
-- an alterantive name
/-
theorem eq_of_subproperty_of_subproperty {a b : property X} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
subproperty.antisymm h₁ h₂
-/
theorem exteq_of_subproperty_of_subproperty {a b : property X} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b :=
λ x, iff.intro (λ h, h₁ h) (λ h, h₂ h)
theorem mem_of_subproperty_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : property X} {a : X} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
assume h₁ h₂, h₁ _ h₂
/- empty property -/
definition empty : property X := λx, false
notation `∅` := property.empty
theorem not_mem_empty (x : X) : ¬ (x ∈ ∅) :=
assume H : x ∈ ∅, false.elim H
theorem mem_empty_eq (x : X) : x ∈ ∅ = false := rfl
/-
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : property X} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
ext (take x, iff.intro
(assume xs, absurd xs (H x))
(assume xe, absurd xe (not_mem_empty x)))
-/
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {s : property X} {x : X} (H : x ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ :=
begin intro Hs, rewrite Hs at H, apply not_mem_empty x H end
theorem empty_subproperty (s : property X) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
take x, assume H, false.elim H
/-theorem eq_empty_of_subproperty_empty {s : property X} (H : s ⊆ ∅) : s = ∅ :=
subproperty.antisymm H (empty_subproperty s)
theorem subproperty_empty_iff (s : property X) : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
iff.intro eq_empty_of_subproperty_empty (take xeq, by rewrite xeq; apply subproperty.refl ∅)
-/
/- universal property -/
definition univ : property X := λx, true
theorem mem_univ (x : X) : x ∈ univ := trivial
theorem mem_univ_eq (x : X) : x ∈ univ = true := rfl
theorem empty_ne_univ [h : inhabited X] : (empty : property X) ≠ univ :=
assume H : empty = univ,
absurd (mem_univ (inhabited.value h)) (eq.rec_on H (not_mem_empty (arbitrary X)))
theorem subproperty_univ (s : property X) : s ⊆ univ := λ x H, trivial
/-
theorem eq_univ_of_univ_subproperty {s : property X} (H : univ ⊆ s) : s = univ :=
eq_of_subproperty_of_subproperty (subproperty_univ s) H
-/
/-
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : property X} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s) : s = univ :=
ext (take x, iff.intro (assume H', trivial) (assume H', H x))
-/
/- union -/
definition union (a b : property X) : property X := λx, x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b
notation a ∪ b := union a b
theorem mem_union_left {x : X} {a : property X} (b : property X) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inl h
theorem mem_union_right {x : X} {b : property X} (a : property X) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem mem_unionl {x : X} {a b : property X} : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inl h
theorem mem_unionr {x : X} {a b : property X} : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : X} {a b : property X} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := H
theorem mem_union.elim {x : X} {a b : property X} {P : Prop}
(H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P) (H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem mem_union_iff (x : X) (a b : property X) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := !iff.refl
theorem mem_union_eq (x : X) (a b : property X) : x ∈ a ∪ b = (x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b) := rfl
--theorem union_self (a : property X) : a ∪ a = a :=
--ext (take x, !or_self)
--theorem union_empty (a : property X) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
--ext (take x, !or_false)
--theorem empty_union (a : property X) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
--ext (take x, !false_or)
--theorem union_comm (a b : property X) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
--ext (take x, or.comm)
--theorem union_assoc (a b c : property X) : (a ∪ b) ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
--ext (take x, or.assoc)
--theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : property X) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
--!left_comm union_comm union_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
--theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : property X) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
--!right_comm union_comm union_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
theorem subproperty_union_left (s t : property X) : s ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x H, or.inl H
theorem subproperty_union_right (s t : property X) : t ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x H, or.inr H
theorem union_subproperty {s t r : property X} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r :=
λ x xst, or.elim xst (λ xs, sr xs) (λ xt, tr xt)
/- intersection -/
definition inter (a b : property X) : property X := λx, x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b
notation a ∩ b := inter a b
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : X) (a b : property X) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b := !iff.refl
theorem mem_inter_eq (x : X) (a b : property X) : x ∈ a ∩ b = (x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b) := rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : X} {a b : property X} (Ha : x ∈ a) (Hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
and.intro Ha Hb
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : X} {a b : property X} (H : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
and.left H
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : X} {a b : property X} (H : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
and.right H
--theorem inter_self (a : property X) : a ∩ a = a :=
--ext (take x, !and_self)
--theorem inter_empty (a : property X) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
--ext (take x, !and_false)
--theorem empty_inter (a : property X) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
--ext (take x, !false_and)
--theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_right {T : Type} {s t : property T} (H : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : t ≠ ∅ :=
--suppose t = ∅,
--have s ∩ t = ∅, by rewrite this; apply inter_empty,
--H this
--theorem nonempty_of_inter_nonempty_left {T : Type} {s t : property T} (H : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : s ≠ ∅ :=
--suppose s = ∅,
--have s ∩ t = ∅, by rewrite this; apply empty_inter,
--H this
--theorem inter_comm (a b : property X) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
--ext (take x, !and.comm)
--theorem inter_assoc (a b c : property X) : (a ∩ b) ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
--ext (take x, !and.assoc)
--theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : property X) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
--!left_comm inter_comm inter_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
--theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : property X) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
--!right_comm inter_comm inter_assoc s₁ s₂ s₃
--theorem inter_univ (a : property X) : a ∩ univ = a :=
--ext (take x, !and_true)
--theorem univ_inter (a : property X) : univ ∩ a = a :=
--ext (take x, !true_and)
theorem inter_subproperty_left (s t : property X) : s ∩ t ⊆ s := λ x H, and.left H
theorem inter_subproperty_right (s t : property X) : s ∩ t ⊆ t := λ x H, and.right H
theorem inter_subproperty_inter_right {s t : property X} (u : property X) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
take x, assume xsu, and.intro (H (and.left xsu)) (and.right xsu)
theorem inter_subproperty_inter_left {s t : property X} (u : property X) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
take x, assume xus, and.intro (and.left xus) (H (and.right xus))
theorem subproperty_inter {s t r : property X} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t :=
λ x xr, and.intro (rs xr) (rt xr)
--theorem not_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem_inter_left {s t : property X} {x : X} (Hxs : x ∈ s) (Hnm : x ∉ s ∩ t) : x ∉ t :=
-- suppose x ∈ t,
-- have x ∈ s ∩ t, from and.intro Hxs this,
-- show false, from Hnm this
--theorem not_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem_inter_right {s t : property X} {x : X} (Hxs : x ∈ t) (Hnm : x ∉ s ∩ t) : x ∉ s :=
-- suppose x ∈ s,
-- have x ∈ s ∩ t, from and.intro this Hxs,
-- show false, from Hnm this
/- distributivity laws -/
--theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : property X) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
--ext (take x, !and.left_distrib)
--theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : property X) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
--ext (take x, !and.right_distrib)
--theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : property X) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
--ext (take x, !or.left_distrib)
--theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : property X) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
--ext (take x, !or.right_distrib)
/- property-builder notation -/
-- {x : X | P}
definition property_of (P : X → Prop) : property X := P
notation `{` binder ` | ` r:(scoped:1 P, property_of P) `}` := r
theorem mem_property_of {P : X → Prop} {a : X} (h : P a) : a ∈ {x | P x} := h
theorem of_mem_property_of {P : X → Prop} {a : X} (h : a ∈ {x | P x}) : P a := h
-- {x ∈ s | P}
definition sep (P : X → Prop) (s : property X) : property X := λx, x ∈ s ∧ P x
notation `{` binder ` ∈ ` s ` | ` r:(scoped:1 p, sep p s) `}` := r
/- insert -/
definition insert (x : X) (a : property X) : property X := {y : X | y = x ∨ y ∈ a}
abbreviation insert_same_level.{u} := @insert.{u u}
-- '{x, y, z}
notation `'{`:max a:(foldr `, ` (x b, insert_same_level x b) ∅) `}`:0 := a
theorem subproperty_insert (x : X) (a : property X) : a ⊆ insert x a :=
take y, assume ys, or.inr ys
theorem mem_insert (x : X) (s : property X) : x ∈ insert x s :=
or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : X} {s : property X} (y : X) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s :=
assume h, or.inr h
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : X} {s : property X} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
assume h, h
/- singleton -/
open trunc_index
theorem mem_singleton_iff {X : Type} [is_set X] (a b : X) : a ∈ '{b} ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro
(assume ainb, or.elim ainb (λ aeqb, aeqb) (λ f, false.elim f))
(assume aeqb, or.inl aeqb)
theorem mem_singleton (a : X) : a ∈ '{a} := !mem_insert
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {X : Type} [is_set X] {x y : X} (h : x ∈ '{y}) : x = y :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert h)
(suppose x = y, this)
(suppose x ∈ ∅, absurd this (not_mem_empty x))
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : X} (H : x = y) : x ∈ '{y} :=
eq.symm H ▸ mem_singleton y
/-
theorem insert_eq (x : X) (s : property X) : insert x s = '{x} ∪ s :=
ext (take y, iff.intro
(suppose y ∈ insert x s,
or.elim this (suppose y = x, or.inl (or.inl this)) (suppose y ∈ s, or.inr this))
(suppose y ∈ '{x} ∪ s,
or.elim this
(suppose y ∈ '{x}, or.inl (eq_of_mem_singleton this))
(suppose y ∈ s, or.inr this)))
-/
/-
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : X) : '{a, a} = '{a} :=
by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem !mem_singleton]
-/
/-
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : X) : '{a} ≠ ∅ :=
begin
intro H,
apply not_mem_empty a,
rewrite -H,
apply mem_insert
end
-/
end property
|
719ca0cc01e18491389720e75a62b7588922adf7 | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/topology/algebra/polynomial.lean | dc38be96b6d63a820bd155f4fff2b6c01dcdedf1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,078 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Robert Y. Lewis
Analytic facts about polynomials.
-/
import topology.algebra.ring
import data.polynomial.div
import data.real.cau_seq
open polynomial is_absolute_value
lemma polynomial.tendsto_infinity {α β : Type*} [comm_ring α] [discrete_linear_ordered_field β]
(abv : α → β) [is_absolute_value abv] {p : polynomial α} (h : 0 < degree p) :
∀ x : β, ∃ r > 0, ∀ z : α, r < abv z → x < abv (p.eval z) :=
degree_pos_induction_on p h
(λ a ha x, ⟨max (x / abv a) 1, (lt_max_iff.2 (or.inr zero_lt_one)), λ z hz,
by simp [max_lt_iff, div_lt_iff' ((abv_pos abv).2 ha), abv_mul abv] at *; tauto⟩)
(λ p hp ih x, let ⟨r, hr0, hr⟩ := ih x in
⟨max r 1, lt_max_iff.2 (or.inr zero_lt_one), λ z hz, by rw [eval_mul, eval_X, abv_mul abv];
calc x < abv (p.eval z) : hr _ (max_lt_iff.1 hz).1
... ≤ abv (eval z p) * abv z : le_mul_of_one_le_right
(abv_nonneg _ _) (max_le_iff.1 (le_of_lt hz)).2⟩)
(λ p a hp ih x, let ⟨r, hr0, hr⟩ := ih (x + abv a) in
⟨r, hr0, λ z hz, by rw [eval_add, eval_C, ← sub_neg_eq_add];
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2
(by rw abv_neg abv; exact (hr z hz)))
(le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_abv_sub_le_abv_sub _ _ _))⟩)
@[continuity]
lemma polynomial.continuous_eval {α} [comm_semiring α] [topological_space α]
[topological_semiring α] (p : polynomial α) : continuous (λ x, p.eval x) :=
begin
apply p.induction,
{ convert continuous_const,
ext, exact eval_zero, },
{ intros a b f haf hb hcts,
simp only [polynomial.eval_add],
refine continuous.add _ hcts,
have : ∀ x, finsupp.sum (finsupp.single a b) (λ (e : ℕ) (a : α), a * x ^ e) = b * x ^a,
from λ x, finsupp.sum_single_index (by simp),
convert continuous.mul _ _,
{ ext, dsimp only [eval_eq_sum], apply this },
{ apply_instance },
{ apply continuous_const },
{ apply continuous_pow }}
end
|
5734582b0ca25859e8dd81149a4412acd32e8d55 | 6de8ea38e7f58ace8fbf74ba3ad0bf3b3d1d7ab5 | /lab5/code/lambda.lean | 51f2db175de598c8796a82305e0f8b0d173d0bfc | [] | no_license | KinanBab/CS591K1-Labs | 72f4e2c7d230d4e4f548a343a47bf815272b1f58 | d4569bf99d20c22cd56721024688cda247d1447f | refs/heads/master | 1,587,016,758,873 | 1,558,148,366,000 | 1,558,148,366,000 | 165,329,114 | 5 | 2 | null | 1,550,689,848,000 | 1,547,252,664,000 | TeX | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,062 | lean | -- Syntax
inductive term
| var : string → term
| abs : string → term → term
| app : term → term → term
-- Custom notation
instance : has_coe string term := ⟨term.var⟩
notation `λ:` x `.` t := term.abs x t
notation `[`t1 `](` t2 `)` := term.app t1 t2
-- string representation of terms
def term.repr : term -> string
| (term.var x) := x
| (term.abs x t) := "λ" ++ x ++ ".(" ++ (term.repr t) ++ ")"
| (term.app t1 t2) := "[" ++ (term.repr t1) ++ "]" ++ "(" ++ (term.repr t2) ++ ")"
instance : has_repr term := ⟨term.repr⟩
-- Example
#check [λ:"x"."x"]("y")
-- Substituation: the core of beta reduction
def substitute : term -> string -> term -> term
| t v (term.var x) :=
if eq v x
then t
else (term.var x)
| t v (term.abs x t') :=
if eq v x
then (term.abs x t')
else (term.abs x (substitute t v t'))
| t v (term.app t1 t2) :=
term.app (substitute t v t1) (substitute t v t2)
#eval (substitute "y" "x" (λ:"z"."x"))
#eval (substitute "y" "x" (λ:"x"."x"))
-- Beta reduction
inductive beta : term -> term -> Prop
| nestAbs {v: string} {t t': term} : beta t t' -> beta (term.abs v t) (term.abs v t')
| absApp {v: string} {t1 t2: term} : beta (term.app (term.abs v t1) t2) (substitute t2 v t1)
| nestApp1 {t t' t2: term} : beta t t' -> beta (term.app t t2) (term.app t' t2)
| nestApp2 {t t' t2: term} : beta t t' -> beta (term.app t2 t) (term.app t2 t')
notation t `→β`:45 t' := beta t t'
-- reflexive transative closure
inductive rStar {T} (rel: T -> T -> Prop) : T -> T -> Prop
| base : ∀ {t}, rStar t t
| trans {t1 t2 t3} : rel t1 t2 -> rStar t2 t3 -> rStar t1 t3
notation t `↠β`:45 t' := (rStar beta) t t'
-- Example
lemma silly1 : ∀ {t1 t2}, (t1 →β t2) → (t1 ↠β t2) :=
begin
intros,
constructor,
apply a,
constructor,
end
lemma silly1' (t1 t2: term) (hp: t1 →β t2) : (t1 ↠β t2) :=
begin
apply rStar.trans,
assumption,
apply rStar.base,
end
-- Example 2
lemma transCut (t1 t2 t3: term) : (t1 ↠β t2) → (t2 ↠β t3) → (t1 ↠β t3) :=
begin
intros,
induction a,
assumption,
have n: (a_t2 ↠β t3), apply a_ih, from a_1,
constructor,
assumption,
assumption,
end
-- normal form
def is_normal : term -> bool
| (term.var _) := tt
| (term.abs _ t') := is_normal t'
| (term.app _ _) := ff
-- left most reduction
inductive left_most_beta : term -> term -> Prop
| absApp {v: string} {t1 t2: term} :
left_most_beta (term.app (term.abs v t1) t2) (substitute t2 v t1)
| nestApp1 {t t' t2: term} :
left_most_beta t t' -> left_most_beta (term.app t t2) (term.app t' t2)
notation t `l→β`:45 t' := left_most_beta t t'
notation t `l↠β`:45 t' := (rStar left_most_beta) t t'
lemma single_left_subst : ∀ {t1 t2: term}, (t1 l→β t2) -> (t1 →β t2) :=
begin
intros,
induction a,
constructor,
constructor,
assumption,
end
theorem left_most_subst : ∀ {t1 t2: term}, (t1 l↠β t2) -> (t1 ↠β t2) :=
begin
intros,
induction a,
constructor,
constructor,
apply single_left_subst,
exact a_a,
assumption,
end
|
81482743cd7a4c249f094fb6a0690e2e6210ea93 | 06be757c84c5c318d56b5d07f1dff4eb19b949d8 | /src/Tate_ring.lean | 2d83db982e693bba6df3977cbf9727b8862fabaa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mr-infty/perfectoid-spaces | ea3e5d161072f6de646b660cc55217838d3ceded | 1a49b3897ec3c7b871d8c970926c00f727a4e2a6 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,252,317,856 | 1,547,326,614,000 | 1,547,326,614,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,720 | lean | import tactic.linarith
import analysis.topology.topological_structures
import ring_theory.subring
import power_bounded
import Huber_ring
-- Scholze : "Recall that a topological ring R is Tate if it contains an
-- open and bounded subring R₀ ⊂ R and a topologically nilpotent unit ϖ ∈ R; such elements are
-- called pseudo-uniformizers."
universe u
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] [topological_space R] [topological_ring R]
open filter function
lemma half_nhds {s : set R} (hs : s ∈ (nhds (0 : R)).sets) :
∃ V ∈ (nhds (0 : R)).sets, ∀ v w ∈ V, v * w ∈ s :=
begin
have : ((λa:R×R, a.1 * a.2) ⁻¹' s) ∈ (nhds ((0, 0) : R × R)).sets :=
tendsto_mul' (by simpa using hs),
rw nhds_prod_eq at this,
rcases filter.mem_prod_iff.1 this with ⟨V₁, H₁, V₂, H₂, H⟩,
exact ⟨V₁ ∩ V₂, filter.inter_mem_sets H₁ H₂, assume v w ⟨hv, _⟩ ⟨_, hw⟩, @H (v, w) ⟨hv, hw⟩⟩
end
def topologically_nilpotent (r : R) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ (nhds (0 :R)).sets, ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, n > N → r^n ∈ U
def is_pseudo_uniformizer (ϖ : units R) : Prop := topologically_nilpotent ϖ.val
variable (R)
def pseudo_uniformizer := { ϖ : units R // topologically_nilpotent ϖ.val}
instance pseudo_unif.power_bounded: has_coe (pseudo_uniformizer R) (power_bounded_subring R) :=
⟨λ ⟨ϖ, h⟩, ⟨ϖ, begin
intros U U_nhds,
rcases half_nhds U_nhds with ⟨U', ⟨U'_nhds, U'_prod⟩⟩,
rcases h U' U'_nhds with ⟨N, H⟩,
let V : set R := (λ u, u*ϖ^(N+1)) '' U',
have V_nhds : V ∈ (nhds (0 : R)).sets,
{ dsimp [V],
have inv : left_inverse (λ (u : R), u * (↑ϖ⁻¹)^((N + 1))) (λ (u : R), u * ϖ^(N + 1)) ∧
right_inverse (λ (u : R), u * (↑ϖ⁻¹)^(N + 1)) (λ (u : R), u * ϖ^(N + 1)),
by split ; intro ; simp [mul_assoc, (mul_pow _ _ _).symm],
rw set.image_eq_preimage_of_inverse inv.1 inv.2,
have : tendsto (λ (u : R), u * ↑ϖ⁻¹ ^ (N + 1)) (nhds 0) (nhds 0),
{ conv {congr, skip, skip, rw ←(zero_mul (↑ϖ⁻¹ ^ (N + 1) : R))},
exact tendsto_mul tendsto_id tendsto_const_nhds },
exact this U'_nhds },
use [V, V_nhds],
rintros v ⟨u, u_in, uv⟩ b ⟨n, h'⟩,
rw [← h', ←uv, mul_assoc, ← pow_add],
apply U'_prod _ _ u_in (H _ _),
clear uv h', -- otherwise linarith gets confused
linarith
end⟩⟩
class Tate_ring (R : Type*) extends comm_ring R, topological_space R, topological_ring R :=
(R₀ : set R)
(R₀_is_open : is_open R₀)
(R₀_is_bounded : is_bounded R₀)
(R₀_is_subring : is_subring R₀)
(ϖ : units R)
(ϖ_is_pseudo_uniformizer : is_pseudo_uniformizer ϖ)
instance tate_ring.to_huber_ring (R : Type*) [Tate_ring R] : Huber_ring R :=
sorry |
2144f807f12d75fa7adda19e2e10104f08968ca8 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/category/Mon/limits.lean | 72d374a402eaa9e4a109845ad7411789d8d3d8fa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,589 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebra.category.Mon.basic
import algebra.group.pi
import category_theory.limits.creates
import category_theory.limits.types
import group_theory.submonoid.operations
/-!
# The category of (commutative) (additive) monoids has all limits
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Further, these limits are preserved by the forgetful functor --- that is,
the underlying types are just the limits in the category of types.
-/
noncomputable theory
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
universes v u
namespace Mon
variables {J : Type v} [small_category J]
@[to_additive]
instance monoid_obj (F : J ⥤ Mon.{max v u}) (j) :
monoid ((F ⋙ forget Mon).obj j) :=
by { change monoid (F.obj j), apply_instance }
/--
The flat sections of a functor into `Mon` form a submonoid of all sections.
-/
@[to_additive
"The flat sections of a functor into `AddMon` form an additive submonoid of all sections."]
def sections_submonoid (F : J ⥤ Mon.{max v u}) :
submonoid (Π j, F.obj j) :=
{ carrier := (F ⋙ forget Mon).sections,
one_mem' := λ j j' f, by simp,
mul_mem' := λ a b ah bh j j' f,
begin
simp only [forget_map_eq_coe, functor.comp_map, monoid_hom.map_mul, pi.mul_apply],
dsimp [functor.sections] at ah bh,
rw [ah f, bh f],
end }
@[to_additive]
instance limit_monoid (F : J ⥤ Mon.{max v u}) :
monoid (types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget Mon.{max v u})).X :=
(sections_submonoid F).to_monoid
/-- `limit.π (F ⋙ forget Mon) j` as a `monoid_hom`. -/
@[to_additive "`limit.π (F ⋙ forget AddMon) j` as an `add_monoid_hom`."]
def limit_π_monoid_hom (F : J ⥤ Mon.{max v u}) (j) :
(types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget Mon)).X →* (F ⋙ forget Mon).obj j :=
{ to_fun := (types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget Mon)).π.app j,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ x y, rfl }
namespace has_limits
-- The next two definitions are used in the construction of `has_limits Mon`.
-- After that, the limits should be constructed using the generic limits API,
-- e.g. `limit F`, `limit.cone F`, and `limit.is_limit F`.
/--
Construction of a limit cone in `Mon`.
(Internal use only; use the limits API.)
-/
@[to_additive "(Internal use only; use the limits API.)"]
def limit_cone (F : J ⥤ Mon.{max v u}) : cone F :=
{ X := Mon.of (types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget _)).X,
π :=
{ app := limit_π_monoid_hom F,
naturality' := λ j j' f,
monoid_hom.coe_inj ((types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget _)).π.naturality f) } }
/--
Witness that the limit cone in `Mon` is a limit cone.
(Internal use only; use the limits API.)
-/
@[to_additive "(Internal use only; use the limits API.)"]
def limit_cone_is_limit (F : J ⥤ Mon.{max v u}) : is_limit (limit_cone F) :=
begin
refine is_limit.of_faithful
(forget Mon) (types.limit_cone_is_limit _)
(λ s, ⟨_, _, _⟩) (λ s, rfl); tidy,
end
end has_limits
open has_limits
/-- The category of monoids has all limits. -/
@[to_additive "The category of additive monoids has all limits."]
instance has_limits_of_size : has_limits_of_size.{v} Mon.{max v u} :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit.mk
{ cone := limit_cone F,
is_limit := limit_cone_is_limit F } } }
@[to_additive]
instance has_limits : has_limits Mon.{u} := Mon.has_limits_of_size.{u u}
/-- The forgetful functor from monoids to types preserves all limits.
This means the underlying type of a limit can be computed as a limit in the category of types. -/
@[to_additive "The forgetful functor from additive monoids to types preserves all limits.
This means the underlying type of a limit can be computed as a limit in the category of types."]
instance forget_preserves_limits_of_size : preserves_limits_of_size.{v} (forget Mon.{max v u}) :=
{ preserves_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ preserves_limit := λ F, preserves_limit_of_preserves_limit_cone
(limit_cone_is_limit F) (types.limit_cone_is_limit (F ⋙ forget _)) } }
@[to_additive]
instance forget_preserves_limits : preserves_limits (forget Mon.{u}) :=
Mon.forget_preserves_limits_of_size.{u u}
end Mon
namespace CommMon
variables {J : Type v} [small_category J]
@[to_additive]
instance comm_monoid_obj (F : J ⥤ CommMon.{max v u}) (j) :
comm_monoid ((F ⋙ forget CommMon).obj j) :=
by { change comm_monoid (F.obj j), apply_instance }
@[to_additive]
instance limit_comm_monoid (F : J ⥤ CommMon.{max v u}) :
comm_monoid (types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget CommMon.{max v u})).X :=
@submonoid.to_comm_monoid (Π j, F.obj j) _
(Mon.sections_submonoid (F ⋙ forget₂ CommMon Mon.{max v u}))
/-- We show that the forgetful functor `CommMon ⥤ Mon` creates limits.
All we need to do is notice that the limit point has a `comm_monoid` instance available,
and then reuse the existing limit. -/
@[to_additive "We show that the forgetful functor `AddCommMon ⥤ AddMon` creates limits.
All we need to do is notice that the limit point has an `add_comm_monoid` instance available,
and then reuse the existing limit."]
instance (F : J ⥤ CommMon.{max v u}) : creates_limit F (forget₂ CommMon Mon.{max v u}) :=
creates_limit_of_reflects_iso (λ c' t,
{ lifted_cone :=
{ X := CommMon.of (types.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget CommMon)).X,
π :=
{ app := Mon.limit_π_monoid_hom (F ⋙ forget₂ CommMon Mon.{max v u}),
naturality' :=
(Mon.has_limits.limit_cone (F ⋙ forget₂ CommMon Mon.{max v u})).π.naturality, } },
valid_lift := by apply is_limit.unique_up_to_iso (Mon.has_limits.limit_cone_is_limit _) t,
makes_limit := is_limit.of_faithful (forget₂ CommMon Mon.{max v u})
(Mon.has_limits.limit_cone_is_limit _) (λ s, _) (λ s, rfl) })
/--
A choice of limit cone for a functor into `CommMon`.
(Generally, you'll just want to use `limit F`.)
-/
@[to_additive "A choice of limit cone for a functor into `CommMon`. (Generally, you'll just want
to use `limit F`.)"]
def limit_cone (F : J ⥤ CommMon.{max v u}) : cone F :=
lift_limit (limit.is_limit (F ⋙ (forget₂ CommMon Mon.{max v u})))
/--
The chosen cone is a limit cone.
(Generally, you'll just want to use `limit.cone F`.)
-/
@[to_additive "The chosen cone is a limit cone. (Generally, you'll just want to use
`limit.cone F`.)"]
def limit_cone_is_limit (F : J ⥤ CommMon.{max v u}) : is_limit (limit_cone F) :=
lifted_limit_is_limit _
/-- The category of commutative monoids has all limits. -/
@[to_additive "The category of commutative monoids has all limits."]
instance has_limits_of_size : has_limits_of_size.{v v} CommMon.{max v u} :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit_of_created F (forget₂ CommMon Mon.{max v u}) } }
@[to_additive]
instance has_limits : has_limits CommMon.{u} := CommMon.has_limits_of_size.{u u}
/-- The forgetful functor from commutative monoids to monoids preserves all limits.
This means the underlying type of a limit can be computed as a limit in the category of monoids. -/
@[to_additive AddCommMon.forget₂_AddMon_preserves_limits "The forgetful functor from additive
commutative monoids to additive monoids preserves all limits.
This means the underlying type of a limit can be computed as a limit in the category of additive
monoids."]
instance forget₂_Mon_preserves_limits_of_size :
preserves_limits_of_size.{v v} (forget₂ CommMon Mon.{max v u}) :=
{ preserves_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥,
{ preserves_limit := λ F, by apply_instance } }
@[to_additive]
instance forget₂_Mon_preserves_limits : preserves_limits (forget₂ CommMon Mon.{u}) :=
CommMon.forget₂_Mon_preserves_limits_of_size.{u u}
/-- The forgetful functor from commutative monoids to types preserves all limits.
This means the underlying type of a limit can be computed as a limit in the category of types. -/
@[to_additive "The forgetful functor from additive commutative monoids to types preserves all
limits.
This means the underlying type of a limit can be computed as a limit in the category of types."]
instance forget_preserves_limits_of_size :
preserves_limits_of_size.{v v} (forget CommMon.{max v u}) :=
{ preserves_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ preserves_limit := λ F, limits.comp_preserves_limit (forget₂ CommMon Mon) (forget Mon) } }
@[to_additive]
instance forget_preserves_limits : preserves_limits (forget CommMon.{u}) :=
CommMon.forget_preserves_limits_of_size.{u u}
end CommMon
|
234a10ccae9136ef915e06a32bf7b752cffcf56f | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/algebra/group/with_one.lean | df9645ea87b6db3ec596bbd1a8e5c644b9cc9bf8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,986 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import algebra.ring.basic
universes u v
variable {α : Type u}
@[to_additive]
def with_one (α) := option α
namespace with_one
@[to_additive]
instance : monad with_one := option.monad
@[to_additive]
instance : has_one (with_one α) := ⟨none⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : inhabited (with_one α) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [nonempty α] : nontrivial (with_one α) := option.nontrivial
@[to_additive]
instance : has_coe_t α (with_one α) := ⟨some⟩
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma one_ne_coe {a : α} : (1 : with_one α) ≠ a :=
λ h, option.no_confusion h
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_ne_one {a : α} : (a : with_one α) ≠ (1 : with_one α) :=
λ h, option.no_confusion h
@[to_additive]
lemma ne_one_iff_exists : ∀ {x : with_one α}, x ≠ 1 ↔ ∃ (a : α), x = a
| 1 := ⟨λ h, false.elim $ h rfl, by { rintros ⟨a,ha⟩ h, simpa using h }⟩
| (a : α) := ⟨λ h, ⟨a, rfl⟩, λ h, with_one.coe_ne_one⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_inj {a b : α} : (a : with_one α) = b ↔ a = b :=
option.some_inj
@[elab_as_eliminator, to_additive]
protected lemma cases_on {P : with_one α → Prop} :
∀ (x : with_one α), P 1 → (∀ a : α, P a) → P x :=
option.cases_on
@[to_additive]
instance [has_mul α] : has_mul (with_one α) :=
{ mul := option.lift_or_get (*) }
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_coe [has_mul α] (a b : α) : (a : with_one α) * b = (a * b : α) := rfl
@[to_additive add_monoid]
instance [semigroup α] : monoid (with_one α) :=
{ mul_assoc := (option.lift_or_get_assoc _).1,
one_mul := (option.lift_or_get_is_left_id _).1,
mul_one := (option.lift_or_get_is_right_id _).1,
..with_one.has_one,
..with_one.has_mul }
@[to_additive add_comm_monoid]
instance [comm_semigroup α] : comm_monoid (with_one α) :=
{ mul_comm := (option.lift_or_get_comm _).1,
..with_one.monoid }
section lift
variables [semigroup α] {β : Type v} [monoid β]
/-- Lift a semigroup homomorphism `f` to a bundled monoid homorphism.
We have no bundled semigroup homomorphisms, so this function
takes `∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y` as an explicit argument. -/
@[to_additive]
def lift (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
(with_one α) →* β :=
{ to_fun := λ x, option.cases_on x 1 f,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := λ x y,
with_one.cases_on x (by { rw one_mul, exact (one_mul _).symm }) $ λ x,
with_one.cases_on y (by { rw mul_one, exact (mul_one _).symm }) $ λ y,
hf x y }
variables (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma lift_coe (x : α) : lift f hf x = f x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma lift_one : lift f hf 1 = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_unique (f : with_one α →* β) : f = lift (f ∘ coe) (λ x y, f.map_mul x y) :=
monoid_hom.ext $ λ x, with_one.cases_on x f.map_one $ λ x, rfl
end lift
section map
variables {β : Type v} [semigroup α] [semigroup β]
@[to_additive]
def map (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
with_one α →* with_one β :=
lift (coe ∘ f) (λ x y, coe_inj.2 $ hf x y)
end map
end with_one
namespace with_zero
instance [one : has_one α] : has_one (with_zero α) :=
{ ..one }
lemma coe_one [has_one α] : ((1 : α) : with_zero α) = 1 := rfl
instance [has_mul α] : mul_zero_class (with_zero α) :=
{ mul := λ o₁ o₂, o₁.bind (λ a, option.map (λ b, a * b) o₂),
zero_mul := λ a, rfl,
mul_zero := λ a, by cases a; refl,
..with_zero.has_zero }
@[simp] lemma mul_coe [has_mul α] (a b : α) :
(a : with_zero α) * b = (a * b : α) := rfl
instance [semigroup α] : semigroup (with_zero α) :=
{ mul_assoc := λ a b c, match a, b, c with
| none, _, _ := rfl
| some a, none, _ := rfl
| some a, some b, none := rfl
| some a, some b, some c := congr_arg some (mul_assoc _ _ _)
end,
..with_zero.mul_zero_class }
instance [comm_semigroup α] : comm_semigroup (with_zero α) :=
{ mul_comm := λ a b, match a, b with
| none, _ := (mul_zero _).symm
| some a, none := rfl
| some a, some b := congr_arg some (mul_comm _ _)
end,
..with_zero.semigroup }
instance [monoid α] : monoid_with_zero (with_zero α) :=
{ one_mul := λ a, match a with
| none := rfl
| some a := congr_arg some $ one_mul _
end,
mul_one := λ a, match a with
| none := rfl
| some a := congr_arg some $ mul_one _
end,
..with_zero.mul_zero_class,
..with_zero.has_one,
..with_zero.semigroup }
instance [comm_monoid α] : comm_monoid_with_zero (with_zero α) :=
{ ..with_zero.monoid_with_zero, ..with_zero.comm_semigroup }
definition inv [has_inv α] (x : with_zero α) : with_zero α :=
do a ← x, return a⁻¹
instance [has_inv α] : has_inv (with_zero α) := ⟨with_zero.inv⟩
@[simp] lemma inv_coe [has_inv α] (a : α) :
(a : with_zero α)⁻¹ = (a⁻¹ : α) := rfl
@[simp] lemma inv_zero [has_inv α] :
(0 : with_zero α)⁻¹ = 0 := rfl
section group
variables [group α]
@[simp] lemma inv_one : (1 : with_zero α)⁻¹ = 1 :=
show ((1⁻¹ : α) : with_zero α) = 1, by simp [coe_one]
definition div (x y : with_zero α) : with_zero α :=
x * y⁻¹
instance : has_div (with_zero α) := ⟨with_zero.div⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_div (a : with_zero α) : 0 / a = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma div_zero (a : with_zero α) : a / 0 = 0 := by change a * _ = _; simp
lemma div_coe (a b : α) : (a : with_zero α) / b = (a * b⁻¹ : α) := rfl
lemma one_div (x : with_zero α) : 1 / x = x⁻¹ := one_mul _
@[simp] lemma div_one : ∀ (x : with_zero α), x / 1 = x
| 0 := rfl
| (a : α) := show _ * _ = _, by simp
@[simp] lemma mul_right_inv : ∀ (x : with_zero α) (h : x ≠ 0), x * x⁻¹ = 1
| 0 h := false.elim $ h rfl
| (a : α) h := by simp [coe_one]
@[simp] lemma mul_left_inv : ∀ (x : with_zero α) (h : x ≠ 0), x⁻¹ * x = 1
| 0 h := false.elim $ h rfl
| (a : α) h := by simp [coe_one]
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_rev : ∀ (x y : with_zero α), (x * y)⁻¹ = y⁻¹ * x⁻¹
| 0 0 := rfl
| 0 (b : α) := rfl
| (a : α) 0 := rfl
| (a : α) (b : α) := by simp
@[simp] lemma mul_div_cancel {a b : with_zero α} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b / b = a :=
show _ * _ * _ = _, by simp [mul_assoc, hb]
@[simp] lemma div_mul_cancel {a b : with_zero α} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b * b = a :=
show _ * _ * _ = _, by simp [mul_assoc, hb]
lemma div_eq_iff_mul_eq {a b c : with_zero α} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a / b = c ↔ c * b = a :=
by split; intro h; simp [h.symm, hb]
end group
section comm_group
variables [comm_group α] {a b c d : with_zero α}
lemma div_eq_div (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b = c / d ↔ a * d = b * c :=
begin
rw ne_zero_iff_exists at hb hd,
rcases hb with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rcases hd with ⟨d, rfl⟩,
induction a using with_zero.cases_on;
induction c using with_zero.cases_on,
{ refl },
{ simp [div_coe] },
{ simp [div_coe] },
erw [with_zero.coe_inj, with_zero.coe_inj],
show a * b⁻¹ = c * d⁻¹ ↔ a * d = b * c,
split; intro H,
{ rw mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul at H,
rw [H, mul_right_comm, inv_mul_cancel_right, mul_comm] },
{ rw [mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_right_comm, mul_comm c, ← H, mul_inv_cancel_right] }
end
end comm_group
section semiring
instance [semiring α] : semiring (with_zero α) :=
{ left_distrib := λ a b c, begin
cases a with a, {refl},
cases b with b; cases c with c; try {refl},
exact congr_arg some (left_distrib _ _ _)
end,
right_distrib := λ a b c, begin
cases c with c,
{ change (a + b) * 0 = a * 0 + b * 0, simp },
cases a with a; cases b with b; try {refl},
exact congr_arg some (right_distrib _ _ _)
end,
..with_zero.add_comm_monoid,
..with_zero.mul_zero_class,
..with_zero.monoid_with_zero }
end semiring
end with_zero
|
8b1a643a836078c01ec2f05affd9295f5aaab96a | e5169dbb8b1bea3ec2a32737442bc91a4a94b46a | /library/data/bool.lean | 6f2b434c9d397af508b59d394376cb37e5648a15 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pazthor/lean | 733b775e3123f6bbd2c4f7ccb5b560b467b76800 | c923120db54276a22a75b12c69765765608a8e76 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,703,744,289 | 1,448,419,395,000 | 1,448,419,703,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,511 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import logic.eq
open eq eq.ops decidable
namespace bool
local attribute bor [reducible]
local attribute band [reducible]
theorem dichotomy (b : bool) : b = ff ∨ b = tt :=
bool.cases_on b (or.inl rfl) (or.inr rfl)
theorem cond_ff {A : Type} (t e : A) : cond ff t e = e :=
rfl
theorem cond_tt {A : Type} (t e : A) : cond tt t e = t :=
rfl
theorem eq_tt_of_ne_ff : ∀ {a : bool}, a ≠ ff → a = tt
| @eq_tt_of_ne_ff tt H := rfl
| @eq_tt_of_ne_ff ff H := absurd rfl H
theorem eq_ff_of_ne_tt : ∀ {a : bool}, a ≠ tt → a = ff
| @eq_ff_of_ne_tt tt H := absurd rfl H
| @eq_ff_of_ne_tt ff H := rfl
theorem absurd_of_eq_ff_of_eq_tt {B : Prop} {a : bool} (H₁ : a = ff) (H₂ : a = tt) : B :=
absurd (H₁⁻¹ ⬝ H₂) ff_ne_tt
theorem tt_bor (a : bool) : bor tt a = tt :=
rfl
notation a || b := bor a b
theorem bor_tt (a : bool) : a || tt = tt :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem ff_bor (a : bool) : ff || a = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem bor_ff (a : bool) : a || ff = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem bor_self (a : bool) : a || a = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem bor.comm (a b : bool) : a || b = b || a :=
by cases a; repeat (cases b | reflexivity)
theorem bor.assoc (a b c : bool) : (a || b) || c = a || (b || c) :=
match a with
| ff := by rewrite *ff_bor
| tt := by rewrite *tt_bor
end
theorem or_of_bor_eq {a b : bool} : a || b = tt → a = tt ∨ b = tt :=
bool.rec_on a
(suppose ff || b = tt,
have b = tt, from !ff_bor ▸ this,
or.inr this)
(suppose tt || b = tt,
or.inl rfl)
theorem bor_inl {a b : bool} (H : a = tt) : a || b = tt :=
by rewrite H
theorem bor_inr {a b : bool} (H : b = tt) : a || b = tt :=
bool.rec_on a (by rewrite H) (by rewrite H)
theorem ff_band (a : bool) : ff && a = ff :=
rfl
theorem tt_band (a : bool) : tt && a = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem band_ff (a : bool) : a && ff = ff :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem band_tt (a : bool) : a && tt = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem band_self (a : bool) : a && a = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem band.comm (a b : bool) : a && b = b && a :=
bool.cases_on a
(bool.cases_on b rfl rfl)
(bool.cases_on b rfl rfl)
theorem band.assoc (a b c : bool) : (a && b) && c = a && (b && c) :=
match a with
| ff := by rewrite *ff_band
| tt := by rewrite *tt_band
end
theorem band_elim_left {a b : bool} (H : a && b = tt) : a = tt :=
or.elim (dichotomy a)
(suppose a = ff,
absurd
(calc ff = ff && b : ff_band
... = a && b : this
... = tt : H)
ff_ne_tt)
(suppose a = tt, this)
theorem band_intro {a b : bool} (H₁ : a = tt) (H₂ : b = tt) : a && b = tt :=
by rewrite [H₁, H₂]
theorem band_elim_right {a b : bool} (H : a && b = tt) : b = tt :=
band_elim_left (!band.comm ⬝ H)
theorem bnot_bnot (a : bool) : bnot (bnot a) = a :=
bool.cases_on a rfl rfl
theorem bnot_false : bnot ff = tt :=
rfl
theorem bnot_true : bnot tt = ff :=
rfl
theorem eq_tt_of_bnot_eq_ff {a : bool} : bnot a = ff → a = tt :=
bool.cases_on a (by contradiction) (λ h, rfl)
theorem eq_ff_of_bnot_eq_tt {a : bool} : bnot a = tt → a = ff :=
bool.cases_on a (λ h, rfl) (by contradiction)
end bool
|
cd117f7ffaedee7c7a310109bc34198a31185123 | d9d511f37a523cd7659d6f573f990e2a0af93c6f | /src/data/set/basic.lean | 354ef6371b4ac0aaf25b550171c4ccd4304d7586 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hikari0108/mathlib | b7ea2b7350497ab1a0b87a09d093ecc025a50dfa | a9e7d333b0cfd45f13a20f7b96b7d52e19fa2901 | refs/heads/master | 1,690,483,608,260 | 1,631,541,580,000 | 1,631,541,580,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 114,923 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import logic.unique
import logic.relation
import order.boolean_algebra
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the core library.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the core
library, as well as extra lemmas for functions in the core library (empty set, univ, union,
intersection, insert, singleton, set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `set_theory/zfc.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : set α` and `s₁ s₂ : set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `strict_subset s₁ s₂ : Prop` : the predicate `s₁ ⊆ s₂` but `s₁ ≠ s₂`.
* `nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `preimage f t : set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `subsingleton s : Prop` : the predicate saying that `s` has at most one element.
* `range f : set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
* `s.prod t : set (α × β)` : the subset `s × t`.
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `image f s`
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : set α`, do not use `subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, image, preimage, pre-image, range, union, intersection, insert,
singleton, complement, powerset
-/
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open function
universe variables u v w x
run_cmd do e ← tactic.get_env,
tactic.set_env $ e.mk_protected `set.compl
lemma has_subset.subset.trans {α : Type*} [has_subset α] [is_trans α (⊆)]
{a b c : α} (h : a ⊆ b) (h' : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := trans h h'
lemma has_subset.subset.antisymm {α : Type*} [has_subset α] [is_antisymm α (⊆)]
{a b : α} (h : a ⊆ b) (h' : b ⊆ a) : a = b := antisymm h h'
lemma has_ssubset.ssubset.trans {α : Type*} [has_ssubset α] [is_trans α (⊂)]
{a b c : α} (h : a ⊂ b) (h' : b ⊂ c) : a ⊂ c := trans h h'
lemma has_ssubset.ssubset.asymm {α : Type*} [has_ssubset α] [is_asymm α (⊂)]
{a b : α} (h : a ⊂ b) : ¬(b ⊂ a) := asymm h
namespace set
variable {α : Type*}
instance : has_le (set α) := ⟨(⊆)⟩
instance : has_lt (set α) := ⟨λ s t, s ≤ t ∧ ¬t ≤ s⟩ -- `⊂` is not defined until further down
instance {α : Type*} : boolean_algebra (set α) :=
{ sup := (∪),
le := (≤),
lt := (<),
inf := (∩),
bot := ∅,
compl := set.compl,
top := univ,
sdiff := (\),
.. (infer_instance : boolean_algebra (α → Prop)) }
@[simp] lemma top_eq_univ : (⊤ : set α) = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : set α) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sup_eq_union : ((⊔) : set α → set α → set α) = (∪) := rfl
@[simp] lemma inf_eq_inter : ((⊓) : set α → set α → set α) = (∩) := rfl
@[simp] lemma le_eq_subset : ((≤) : set α → set α → Prop) = (⊆) := rfl
/-! `set.lt_eq_ssubset` is defined further down -/
@[simp] lemma compl_eq_compl : set.compl = (has_compl.compl : set α → set α) := rfl
/-- Coercion from a set to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type*} : has_coe_to_sort (set α) := ⟨_, λ s, {x // x ∈ s}⟩
instance pi_set_coe.can_lift (ι : Type u) (α : Π i : ι, Type v) [ne : Π i, nonempty (α i)]
(s : set ι) :
can_lift (Π i : s, α i) (Π i, α i) :=
{ coe := λ f i, f i,
.. pi_subtype.can_lift ι α s }
instance pi_set_coe.can_lift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [ne : nonempty α] (s : set ι) :
can_lift (s → α) (ι → α) :=
pi_set_coe.can_lift ι (λ _, α) s
instance set_coe.can_lift (s : set α) : can_lift α s :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := λ a, a ∈ s,
prf := λ a ha, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩ }
end set
section set_coe
variables {α : Type u}
theorem set.set_coe_eq_subtype (s : set α) :
coe_sort.{(u+1) (u+2)} s = {x // x ∈ s} := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_coe.forall {s : set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ (∀ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩) :=
subtype.forall
@[simp] theorem set_coe.exists {s : set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ (∃ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩) :=
subtype.exists
theorem set_coe.exists' {s : set α} {p : Π x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ x (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ (∃ x : s, p x x.2) :=
(@set_coe.exists _ _ $ λ x, p x.1 x.2).symm
theorem set_coe.forall' {s : set α} {p : Π x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ x (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ (∀ x : s, p x x.2) :=
(@set_coe.forall _ _ $ λ x, p x.1 x.2).symm
@[simp] theorem set_coe_cast : ∀ {s t : set α} (H' : s = t) (H : @eq (Type u) s t) (x : s),
cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| s _ rfl _ ⟨x, h⟩ := rfl
theorem set_coe.ext {s : set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b → a = b :=
subtype.eq
theorem set_coe.ext_iff {s : set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
iff.intro set_coe.ext (assume h, h ▸ rfl)
end set_coe
/-- See also `subtype.prop` -/
lemma subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s := p.prop
lemma eq.subset {α} {s t : set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
by { rintro rfl x hx, exact hx }
namespace set
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {a : α} {s t : set α}
instance : inhabited (set α) := ⟨∅⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {a b : set α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ a ↔ x ∈ b) : a = b :=
funext (assume x, propext (h x))
theorem ext_iff {s t : set α} : s = t ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h, ext⟩
@[trans] theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : set α}
(hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t := h hx
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `set_of` -/
@[simp] theorem mem_set_of_eq {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ {a | p a} = p a := rfl
theorem nmem_set_of_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} : a ∉ {a : α | P a} = ¬ P a := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_of_mem_eq {s : set α} : {x | x ∈ s} = s := rfl
theorem set_of_set {s : set α} : set_of s = s := rfl
lemma set_of_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x := iff.rfl
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a := iff.rfl
instance decidable_set_of (p : α → Prop) [H : decidable_pred p] : decidable_pred (∈ {a | p a}) := H
@[simp] theorem set_of_subset_set_of {p q : α → Prop} :
{a | p a} ⊆ {a | q a} ↔ (∀a, p a → q a) := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma sep_set_of {p q : α → Prop} : {a ∈ {a | p a } | q a} = {a | p a ∧ q a} := rfl
lemma set_of_and {p q : α → Prop} : {a | p a ∧ q a} = {a | p a} ∩ {a | q a} := rfl
lemma set_of_or {p q : α → Prop} : {a | p a ∨ q a} = {a | p a} ∪ {a | q a} := rfl
/-! ### Lemmas about subsets -/
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def {s t : set α} : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := rfl
@[refl] theorem subset.refl (a : set α) : a ⊆ a := assume x, id
theorem subset.rfl {s : set α} : s ⊆ s := subset.refl s
@[trans] theorem subset.trans {a b c : set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c :=
assume x h, bc (ab h)
@[trans] theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
theorem subset.antisymm {a b : set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
set.ext $ λ x, ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
theorem subset.antisymm_iff {a b : set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨λ e, ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b := subset.antisymm
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ := @h _
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt $ mem_of_subset_of_mem h
theorem not_subset : (¬ s ⊆ t) ↔ ∃a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by simp only [subset_def, not_forall]
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
instance : has_ssubset (set α) := ⟨(<)⟩
@[simp] lemma lt_eq_ssubset : ((<) : set α → set α → Prop) = (⊂) := rfl
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬ (t ⊆ s)) := rfl
theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
lemma exists_of_ssubset {s t : set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : (∃x∈t, x ∉ s) :=
not_subset.1 h.2
lemma ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (set α) _ s t
lemma ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, λ ⟨x, hxt, hxs⟩, ⟨h, λ h, hxs $ h hxt⟩⟩
lemma ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, λ hs₃s₁, hs₁s₂.2 (subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
lemma ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, λ hs₃s₁, hs₂s₃.2 (subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬ (x ∈ (∅ : set α)) := id
@[simp] theorem not_not_mem : ¬ (a ∉ s) ↔ a ∈ s := not_not
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
/-- The property `s.nonempty` expresses the fact that the set `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def nonempty (s : set α) : Prop := ∃ x, x ∈ s
lemma nonempty_def : s.nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s := iff.rfl
lemma nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.nonempty := ⟨x, h⟩
theorem nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.nonempty → ¬(s ⊆ ∅)
| ⟨x, hx⟩ hs := hs hx
theorem nonempty.ne_empty : ∀ {s : set α}, s.nonempty → s ≠ ∅
| _ ⟨x, hx⟩ rfl := hx
@[simp] theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : set α).nonempty :=
λ h, h.ne_empty rfl
/-- Extract a witness from `s.nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def nonempty.some (h : s.nonempty) : α := classical.some h
protected lemma nonempty.some_mem (h : s.nonempty) : h.some ∈ s := classical.some_spec h
lemma nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.nonempty) : t.nonempty := hs.imp ht
lemma nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h in ⟨x, xs, xt⟩
lemma nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
lemma nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).nonempty) : s.nonempty := h.imp $ λ _, and.left
lemma nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.nonempty := (nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
lemma nonempty.inl (hs : s.nonempty) : (s ∪ t).nonempty := hs.imp $ λ _, or.inl
lemma nonempty.inr (ht : t.nonempty) : (s ∪ t).nonempty := ht.imp $ λ _, or.inr
@[simp] lemma union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty ∨ t.nonempty := exists_or_distrib
lemma nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).nonempty) : s.nonempty := h.imp $ λ _, and.left
lemma nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).nonempty) : t.nonempty := h.imp $ λ _, and.right
lemma nonempty_inter_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).nonempty ↔ ∃ x : t, ↑x ∈ s :=
⟨λ ⟨x, xs, xt⟩, ⟨⟨x, xt⟩, xs⟩, λ ⟨⟨x, xt⟩, xs⟩, ⟨x, xs, xt⟩⟩
lemma nonempty_inter_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).nonempty ↔ ∃ x : s, ↑x ∈ t :=
⟨λ ⟨x, xs, xt⟩, ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, xt⟩, λ ⟨⟨x, xt⟩, xs⟩, ⟨x, xt, xs⟩⟩
lemma nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : nonempty α ↔ (univ : set α).nonempty :=
⟨λ ⟨x⟩, ⟨x, trivial⟩, λ ⟨x, _⟩, ⟨x⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma univ_nonempty : ∀ [h : nonempty α], (univ : set α).nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ := ⟨x, trivial⟩
lemma nonempty.to_subtype (h : s.nonempty) : nonempty s :=
nonempty_subtype.2 h
instance [nonempty α] : nonempty (set.univ : set α) := set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
@[simp] lemma nonempty_insert (a : α) (s : set α) : (insert a s).nonempty := ⟨a, or.inl rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype [nonempty s] : s.nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : set α) = {x | false} := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_empty_eq (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : set α) = false := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_of_false : {a : α | false} = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_subset (s : set α) : ∅ ⊆ s.
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(subset.antisymm_iff.trans $ and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s := subset_empty_iff.symm
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ := subset_empty_iff.1
theorem eq_empty_of_is_empty [is_empty α] (s : set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ λ x hx, is_empty_elim x
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
-- TODO[gh-6025]: make this an instance once safe to do so
def unique_empty [is_empty α] : unique (set α) :=
{ default := ∅, uniq := eq_empty_of_is_empty }
lemma not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : set α} : ¬s.nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
by simp only [set.nonempty, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, not_exists]
lemma empty_not_nonempty : ¬(∅ : set α).nonempty := λ h, h.ne_empty rfl
theorem ne_empty_iff_nonempty : s ≠ ∅ ↔ s.nonempty := not_iff_comm.1 not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
lemma eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_empty_iff_nonempty.1
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 $ e ▸ h
theorem ball_empty_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : set α), p x) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ x, false.elim
instance (α : Type u) : is_empty.{u+1} (∅ : set α) :=
⟨λ x, x.2⟩
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp] theorem set_of_true : {x : α | true} = univ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_univ (x : α) : x ∈ @univ α := trivial
@[simp] lemma univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : set α) = ∅ ↔ is_empty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans ⟨λ H, ⟨λ x, H x trivial⟩, λ H x _, @is_empty.false α H x⟩
theorem empty_ne_univ [nonempty α] : (∅ : set α) ≠ univ :=
λ e, not_is_empty_of_nonempty α $ univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
@[simp] theorem subset_univ (s : set α) : s ⊆ univ := λ x H, trivial
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
(subset.antisymm_iff.trans $ and_iff_right (subset_univ _)).symm
theorem eq_univ_of_univ_subset {s : set α} : univ ⊆ s → s = univ := univ_subset_iff.1
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans $ forall_congr $ λ x, imp_iff_right ⟨⟩
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ := eq_univ_iff_forall.2
lemma eq_univ_of_subset {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset $ hs ▸ h
lemma exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [nonempty α], ∃x:α, x ∈ (univ : set α)
| ⟨x⟩ := ⟨x, trivial⟩
instance univ_decidable : decidable_pred (∈ @set.univ α) :=
λ x, is_true trivial
lemma ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s :=
by rw [←not_forall, ←eq_univ_iff_forall]
lemma not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : set α} :
¬ s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t :=
by simp [subset_def]
/-- `diagonal α` is the subset of `α × α` consisting of all pairs of the form `(a, a)`. -/
def diagonal (α : Type*) : set (α × α) := {p | p.1 = p.2}
@[simp]
lemma mem_diagonal {α : Type*} (x : α) : (x, x) ∈ diagonal α :=
by simp [diagonal]
/-! ### Lemmas about union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : set α} (b : set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b := or.inl
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : set α} (a : set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b := or.inr
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := H
theorem mem_union.elim {x : α} {a b : set α} {P : Prop}
(H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P) (H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_union_eq (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b = (x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem union_self (a : set α) : a ∪ a = a := ext $ λ x, or_self _
@[simp] theorem union_empty (a : set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a := ext $ λ x, or_false _
@[simp] theorem empty_union (a : set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a := ext $ λ x, false_or _
theorem union_comm (a b : set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a := ext $ λ x, or.comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∪ b) ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) := ext $ λ x, or.assoc
instance union_is_assoc : is_associative (set α) (∪) := ⟨union_assoc⟩
instance union_is_comm : is_commutative (set α) (∪) := ⟨union_comm⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext $ λ x, or.left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ s₃ = (s₁ ∪ s₃) ∪ s₂ :=
ext $ λ x, or.right_comm
@[simp] theorem union_eq_left_iff_subset {s t : set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
@[simp] theorem union_eq_right_iff_subset {s t : set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right_iff_subset.mpr h
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left_iff_subset.mpr h
@[simp] theorem subset_union_left (s t : set α) : s ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x, or.inl
@[simp] theorem subset_union_right (s t : set α) : t ⊆ s ∪ t := λ x, or.inr
theorem union_subset {s t r : set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r :=
λ x, or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
@[simp] theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr (by exact λ x, or_imp_distrib)).trans forall_and_distrib
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α}
(h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := λ x, or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h subset.rfl
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union subset.rfl h
lemma subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
subset.trans h (subset_union_left t u)
lemma subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
subset.trans h (subset_union_right t u)
@[simp] theorem union_empty_iff {s t : set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ :=
by simp only [← subset_empty_iff]; exact union_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma union_univ {s : set α} : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq
@[simp] lemma univ_union {s : set α} : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq
/-! ### Lemmas about intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = {a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂} := rfl
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_eq (x : α) (a b : set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b = (x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b) := rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b := ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a := h.left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b := h.right
@[simp] theorem inter_self (a : set α) : a ∩ a = a := ext $ λ x, and_self _
@[simp] theorem inter_empty (a : set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ := ext $ λ x, and_false _
@[simp] theorem empty_inter (a : set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ := ext $ λ x, false_and _
theorem inter_comm (a b : set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a := ext $ λ x, and.comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∩ b) ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) := ext $ λ x, and.assoc
instance inter_is_assoc : is_associative (set α) (∩) := ⟨inter_assoc⟩
instance inter_is_comm : is_commutative (set α) (∩) := ⟨inter_comm⟩
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext $ λ x, and.left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : set α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ∩ s₃ = (s₁ ∩ s₃) ∩ s₂ :=
ext $ λ x, and.right_comm
@[simp] theorem inter_subset_left (s t : set α) : s ∩ t ⊆ s := λ x, and.left
@[simp] theorem inter_subset_right (s t : set α) : s ∩ t ⊆ t := λ x, and.right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := λ x h, ⟨rs h, rt h⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr (by exact λ x, imp_and_distrib)).trans forall_and_distrib
@[simp] theorem inter_eq_left_iff_subset {s t : set α} : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_left
@[simp] theorem inter_eq_right_iff_subset {s t : set α} : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
inf_eq_right
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left_iff_subset.mpr
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right_iff_subset.mpr
@[simp] theorem inter_univ (a : set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq
@[simp] theorem univ_inter (a : set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α}
(h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := λ x, and.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : set α} (u : set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H subset.rfl
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : set α} (u : set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter subset.rfl H
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right $ subset_union_left _ _
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right $ subset_union_right _ _
/-! ### Distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sup_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_left {s t u : set α} : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sup_left
theorem inter_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sup_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_right {s t u : set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) ∪ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sup_right
theorem union_distrib_left (s t u : set α) : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_left {s t u : set α} : s ∪ (t ∩ u) = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left
theorem union_distrib_right (s t u : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right
theorem inter_union_distrib_right {s t u : set α} : (s ∩ t) ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right
/-!
### Lemmas about `insert`
`insert α s` is the set `{α} ∪ s`.
-/
theorem insert_def (x : α) (s : set α) : insert x s = { y | y = x ∨ y ∈ s } := rfl
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : s ⊆ insert x s := λ y, or.inr
theorem mem_insert (x : α) (s : set α) : x ∈ insert x s := or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : α} {s : set α} (y : α) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s := or.inr
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s := id
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x ≠ a → x ∈ s :=
or.resolve_left
@[simp] theorem mem_insert_iff {x a : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ insert a s ↔ x = a ∨ x ∈ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
ext $ λ x, or_iff_right_of_imp $ λ e, e.symm ▸ h
lemma ne_insert_of_not_mem {s : set α} (t : set α) {a : α} : a ∉ s → s ≠ insert a t :=
mt $ λ e, e.symm ▸ mem_insert _ _
theorem insert_subset : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ (a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t) :=
by simp only [subset_def, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq, mem_insert_iff]
theorem insert_subset_insert (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t := λ x, or.imp_right (@h _)
theorem ssubset_iff_insert {s t : set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t :=
begin
simp only [insert_subset, exists_and_distrib_right, ssubset_def, not_subset],
simp only [exists_prop, and_comm]
end
theorem ssubset_insert {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_insert.2 ⟨a, h, subset.refl _⟩
theorem insert_comm (a b : α) (s : set α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext $ λ x, or.left_comm
theorem insert_union : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) := ext $ λ x, or.assoc
@[simp] theorem union_insert : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) := ext $ λ x, or.left_comm
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : set α) : (insert a s).nonempty := ⟨a, mem_insert a s⟩
instance (a : α) (s : set α) : nonempty (insert a s : set α) := (insert_nonempty a s).to_subtype
lemma insert_inter (x : α) (s t : set α) : insert x (s ∩ t) = insert x s ∩ insert x t :=
ext $ λ y, or_and_distrib_left
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α}
(H : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x) (x) (h : x ∈ s) : P x := H _ (or.inr h)
theorem forall_insert_of_forall {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α}
(H : ∀ x, x ∈ s → P x) (ha : P a) (x) (h : x ∈ insert a s) : P x :=
h.elim (λ e, e.symm ▸ ha) (H _)
theorem bex_insert_iff {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} :
(∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∨ (∃ x ∈ s, P x) :=
bex_or_left_distrib.trans $ or_congr_left bex_eq_left
theorem ball_insert_iff {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : set α} :
(∀ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ (∀x ∈ s, P x) :=
ball_or_left_distrib.trans $ and_congr_left' forall_eq
/-! ### Lemmas about singletons -/
theorem singleton_def (a : α) : ({a} : set α) = insert a ∅ := (insert_emptyc_eq _).symm
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton_iff {a b : α} : a ∈ ({b} : set α) ↔ a = b := iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma set_of_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : {n | n = a} = {a} :=
ext $ λ n, (set.mem_singleton_iff).symm
-- TODO: again, annotation needed
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : set α) := @rfl _ _
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : set α)) : x = y := h
@[simp] theorem singleton_eq_singleton_iff {x y : α} : {x} = ({y} : set α) ↔ x = y :=
ext_iff.trans eq_iff_eq_cancel_left
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : α} (H : x = y) : x ∈ ({y} : set α) := H
theorem insert_eq (x : α) (s : set α) : insert x s = ({x} : set α) ∪ s := rfl
@[simp] theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : set α) = {a} := union_self _
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : set α) = {b, a} := union_comm _ _
@[simp] theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : set α).nonempty :=
⟨a, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem singleton_subset_iff {a : α} {s : set α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := forall_eq
theorem set_compr_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : {b | b = a} = {a} := rfl
@[simp] theorem singleton_union : {a} ∪ s = insert a s := rfl
@[simp] theorem union_singleton : s ∪ {a} = insert a s := union_comm _ _
@[simp] theorem singleton_inter_nonempty : ({a} ∩ s).nonempty ↔ a ∈ s :=
by simp only [set.nonempty, mem_inter_eq, mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left]
@[simp] theorem inter_singleton_nonempty : (s ∩ {a}).nonempty ↔ a ∈ s :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_nonempty]
@[simp] theorem singleton_inter_eq_empty : {a} ∩ s = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans $ not_congr singleton_inter_nonempty
@[simp] theorem inter_singleton_eq_empty : s ∩ {a} = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
by rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_eq_empty]
lemma nmem_singleton_empty {s : set α} : s ∉ ({∅} : set (set α)) ↔ s.nonempty :=
ne_empty_iff_nonempty
instance unique_singleton (a : α) : unique ↥({a} : set α) :=
⟨⟨⟨a, mem_singleton a⟩⟩, λ ⟨x, h⟩, subtype.eq h⟩
lemma eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : set α} {a : α} : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
subset.antisymm_iff.trans $ and.comm.trans $ and_congr_left' singleton_subset_iff
lemma eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : set α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.trans $ and_congr_left $ λ H, ⟨λ h', ⟨_, h'⟩, λ ⟨x, h⟩, H x h ▸ h⟩
-- while `simp` is capable of proving this, it is not capable of turning the LHS into the RHS.
@[simp] lemma default_coe_singleton (x : α) :
default ({x} : set α) = ⟨x, rfl⟩ := rfl
/-! ### Lemmas about sets defined as `{x ∈ s | p x}`. -/
theorem mem_sep {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} :=
⟨xs, px⟩
@[simp] theorem sep_mem_eq {s t : set α} : {x ∈ s | x ∈ t} = s ∩ t := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_sep_eq {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} :
x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} = (x ∈ s ∧ p x) := rfl
theorem mem_sep_iff {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : x ∈ {x ∈ s | p x} ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
iff.rfl
theorem eq_sep_of_subset {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s = {x ∈ t | x ∈ s} :=
(inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h).symm
@[simp] theorem sep_subset (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) : {x ∈ s | p x} ⊆ s := λ x, and.left
theorem forall_not_of_sep_empty {s : set α} {p : α → Prop} (H : {x ∈ s | p x} = ∅)
(x) : x ∈ s → ¬ p x := not_and.1 (eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 H x : _)
@[simp] lemma sep_univ {α} {p : α → Prop} : {a ∈ (univ : set α) | p a} = {a | p a} := univ_inter _
@[simp] lemma sep_true : {a ∈ s | true} = s :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma sep_false : {a ∈ s | false} = ∅ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma subset_singleton_iff {α : Type*} {s : set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, y = x :=
iff.rfl
lemma subset_singleton_iff_eq {s : set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {x} :=
begin
obtain (rfl | hs) := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty,
use ⟨λ _, or.inl rfl, λ _, empty_subset _⟩,
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, hs, ne_empty_iff_nonempty.2 hs],
end
lemma ssubset_singleton_iff {s : set α} {x : α} : s ⊂ {x} ↔ s = ∅ :=
begin
rw [ssubset_iff_subset_ne, subset_singleton_iff_eq, or_and_distrib_right, and_not_self, or_false,
and_iff_left_iff_imp],
rintro rfl,
refine ne_comm.1 (ne_empty_iff_nonempty.2 (singleton_nonempty _)),
end
lemma eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : set α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
/-! ### Lemmas about complement -/
theorem mem_compl {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ := h
lemma compl_set_of {α} (p : α → Prop) : {a | p a}ᶜ = { a | ¬ p a } := rfl
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s := h
@[simp] theorem mem_compl_eq (s : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ sᶜ = (x ∉ s) := rfl
theorem mem_compl_iff (s : set α) (x : α) : x ∈ sᶜ ↔ x ∉ s := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem inter_compl_self (s : set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ := inf_compl_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem compl_inter_self (s : set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ := compl_inf_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem compl_empty : (∅ : set α)ᶜ = univ := compl_bot
@[simp] theorem compl_union (s t : set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ := compl_sup
theorem compl_inter (s t : set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ := compl_inf
@[simp] theorem compl_univ : (univ : set α)ᶜ = ∅ := compl_top
@[simp] lemma compl_empty_iff {s : set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ := compl_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma compl_univ_iff {s : set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ := compl_eq_top
lemma nonempty_compl {s : set α} : sᶜ.nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ :=
ne_empty_iff_nonempty.symm.trans $ not_congr $ compl_empty_iff
lemma mem_compl_singleton_iff {a x : α} : x ∈ ({a} : set α)ᶜ ↔ x ≠ a :=
not_congr mem_singleton_iff
lemma compl_singleton_eq (a : α) : ({a} : set α)ᶜ = {x | x ≠ a} :=
ext $ λ x, mem_compl_singleton_iff
@[simp]
lemma compl_ne_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({x | x ≠ a} : set α)ᶜ = {a} :=
by { ext, simp, }
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext $ λ x, or_iff_not_and_not
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext $ λ x, and_iff_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem union_compl_self (s : set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ := eq_univ_iff_forall.2 $ λ x, em _
@[simp] theorem compl_union_self (s : set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
theorem compl_comp_compl : compl ∘ compl = @id (set α) := funext compl_compl
theorem compl_subset_comm {s t : set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s := @compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s t _
@[simp] lemma compl_subset_compl {s t : set α} : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s := @compl_le_compl_iff_le _ t s _
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
iff.symm $ eq_univ_iff_forall.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a, or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem subset_compl_comm {s t : set α} : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
forall_congr $ λ a, imp_not_comm
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint {s t : set α} : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ a, and_imp.symm) subset_empty_iff
lemma subset_compl_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : set α} : s ⊆ {a}ᶜ ↔ a ∉ s :=
subset_compl_comm.trans singleton_subset_iff
theorem inter_subset (a b c : set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr $ λ x, and_imp.trans $ imp_congr_right $ λ _, imp_iff_not_or
lemma inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).nonempty ↔ ¬ s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans $ exists_congr $ by exact λ x, by simp [mem_compl]).symm
/-! ### Lemmas about set difference -/
theorem diff_eq (s t : set α) : s \ t = s ∩ tᶜ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_diff {s t : set α} (x : α) : x ∈ s \ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := iff.rfl
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {s t : set α} {x : α} (h1 : x ∈ s) (h2 : x ∉ t) : x ∈ s \ t :=
⟨h1, h2⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s :=
by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
theorem nonempty_diff {s t : set α} : (s \ t).nonempty ↔ ¬ (s ⊆ t) := inter_compl_nonempty_iff
theorem diff_subset (s t : set α) : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s, from sdiff_le
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ (u \ s) = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ (t \ s) = t :=
sup_sdiff_of_le h
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left h
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
@[simp] theorem union_diff_left {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
@[simp] theorem union_diff_right {s t : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
theorem inter_diff_assoc (a b c : set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) :=
inf_sdiff_assoc
@[simp] theorem inter_diff_self (a b : set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
@[simp] theorem inter_union_diff (s t : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ (s \ t) = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
@[simp] lemma diff_union_inter (s t : set α) : (s \ t) ∪ (s ∩ t) = s :=
by { rw union_comm, exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _ }
@[simp] theorem inter_union_compl (s t : set α) : (s ∩ t) ∪ (s ∩ tᶜ) = s := inter_union_diff _ _
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
show s₁ ≤ s₂ → t₂ ≤ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ≤ s₂ \ t₂, from sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
sdiff_le_self_sdiff ‹s₁ ≤ s₂›
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_self ‹t ≤ u›
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : set α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
top_sdiff.symm
@[simp] lemma empty_diff (s : set α) : (∅ \ s : set α) = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp] theorem diff_empty {s : set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
@[simp] lemma diff_univ (s : set α) : s \ univ = ∅ := diff_eq_empty.2 (subset_univ s)
theorem diff_diff {u : set α} : s \ t \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_left
-- the following statement contains parentheses to help the reader
lemma diff_diff_comm {s t u : set α} : (s \ t) \ u = (s \ u) \ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_comm
lemma diff_subset_iff {s t u : set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ t ∪ u, from sdiff_le_iff
lemma subset_diff_union (s t : set α) : s ⊆ (s \ t) ∪ t :=
show s ≤ (s \ t) ∪ t, from le_sdiff_sup
lemma diff_union_of_subset {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) :
(s \ t) ∪ t = s :=
subset.antisymm (union_subset (diff_subset _ _) h) (subset_diff_union _ _)
@[simp] lemma diff_singleton_subset_iff {x : α} {s t : set α} : s \ {x} ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ insert x t :=
by { rw [←union_singleton, union_comm], apply diff_subset_iff }
lemma subset_diff_singleton {x : α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hx : x ∉ s) : s ⊆ t \ {x} :=
subset_inter h $ subset_compl_comm.1 $ singleton_subset_iff.2 hx
lemma subset_insert_diff_singleton (x : α) (s : set α) : s ⊆ insert x (s \ {x}) :=
by rw [←diff_singleton_subset_iff]
lemma diff_subset_comm {s t u : set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s \ u ≤ t, from sdiff_le_comm
lemma diff_inter {s t u : set α} : s \ (t ∩ u) = (s \ t) ∪ (s \ u) :=
sdiff_inf
lemma diff_inter_diff {s t u : set α} : s \ t ∩ (s \ u) = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sup.symm
lemma diff_compl : s \ tᶜ = s ∩ t := sdiff_compl
lemma diff_diff_right {s t u : set α} : s \ (t \ u) = (s \ t) ∪ (s ∩ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_right'
@[simp] theorem insert_diff_of_mem (s) (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s \ t = s \ t :=
by { ext, split; simp [or_imp_distrib, h] {contextual := tt} }
theorem insert_diff_of_not_mem (s) (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s \ t = insert a (s \ t) :=
begin
classical,
ext x,
by_cases h' : x ∈ t,
{ have : x ≠ a,
{ assume H,
rw H at h',
exact h h' },
simp [h, h', this] },
{ simp [h, h'] }
end
lemma insert_diff_self_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∉ s) :
insert a s \ {a} = s :=
by { ext, simp [and_iff_left_of_imp (λ hx : x ∈ s, show x ≠ a, from λ hxa, h $ hxa ▸ hx)] }
lemma insert_inter_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by simp [set.insert_inter, h]
lemma insert_inter_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_inter_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_inter_eq, and.congr_left_iff, or_iff_right_iff_imp],
cc,
end
@[simp] theorem union_diff_self {s t : set α} : s ∪ (t \ s) = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self_right
@[simp] theorem diff_union_self {s t : set α} : (s \ t) ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self_left
@[simp] theorem diff_inter_self {a b : set α} : (b \ a) ∩ a = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
@[simp] theorem diff_inter_self_eq_diff {s t : set α} : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right
@[simp] theorem diff_self_inter {s t : set α} : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left
@[simp] theorem diff_eq_self {s t : set α} : s \ t = s ↔ t ∩ s ⊆ ∅ :=
show s \ t = s ↔ t ⊓ s ≤ ⊥, from sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint
@[simp] theorem diff_singleton_eq_self {a : α} {s : set α} (h : a ∉ s) : s \ {a} = s :=
diff_eq_self.2 $ by simp [singleton_inter_eq_empty.2 h]
@[simp] theorem insert_diff_singleton {a : α} {s : set α} :
insert a (s \ {a}) = insert a s :=
by simp [insert_eq, union_diff_self, -union_singleton, -singleton_union]
@[simp] lemma diff_self {s : set α} : s \ s = ∅ := sdiff_self
lemma diff_diff_cancel_left {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : t \ (t \ s) = s :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
lemma mem_diff_singleton {x y : α} {s : set α} : x ∈ s \ {y} ↔ (x ∈ s ∧ x ≠ y) :=
iff.rfl
lemma mem_diff_singleton_empty {s : set α} {t : set (set α)} :
s ∈ t \ {∅} ↔ (s ∈ t ∧ s.nonempty) :=
mem_diff_singleton.trans $ and_congr iff.rfl ne_empty_iff_nonempty
lemma union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter (s t : set α) :
s ∪ t = (s \ t) ∪ (t \ s) ∪ (s ∩ t) :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
/-! ### Powerset -/
theorem mem_powerset {x s : set α} (h : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ powerset s := h
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : set α} (h : x ∈ powerset s) : x ⊆ s := h
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : set α) : x ∈ powerset s ↔ x ⊆ s := iff.rfl
theorem powerset_inter (s t : set α) : 𝒫 (s ∩ t) = 𝒫 s ∩ 𝒫 t :=
ext $ λ u, subset_inter_iff
@[simp] theorem powerset_mono : 𝒫 s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨λ h, h (subset.refl s), λ h u hu, subset.trans hu h⟩
theorem monotone_powerset : monotone (powerset : set α → set (set α)) :=
λ s t, powerset_mono.2
@[simp] theorem powerset_nonempty : (𝒫 s).nonempty :=
⟨∅, empty_subset s⟩
@[simp] theorem powerset_empty : 𝒫 (∅ : set α) = {∅} :=
ext $ λ s, subset_empty_iff
@[simp] theorem powerset_univ : 𝒫 (univ : set α) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall subset_univ
/-! ### If-then-else for sets -/
/-- `ite` for sets: `set.ite t s s' ∩ t = s ∩ t`, `set.ite t s s' ∩ tᶜ = s' ∩ tᶜ`.
Defined as `s ∩ t ∪ s' \ t`. -/
protected def ite (t s s' : set α) : set α := s ∩ t ∪ s' \ t
@[simp] lemma ite_inter_self (t s s' : set α) : t.ite s s' ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
by rw [set.ite, union_inter_distrib_right, diff_inter_self, inter_assoc, inter_self, union_empty]
@[simp] lemma ite_compl (t s s' : set α) : tᶜ.ite s s' = t.ite s' s :=
by rw [set.ite, set.ite, diff_compl, union_comm, diff_eq]
@[simp] lemma ite_inter_compl_self (t s s' : set α) : t.ite s s' ∩ tᶜ = s' ∩ tᶜ :=
by rw [← ite_compl, ite_inter_self]
@[simp] lemma ite_diff_self (t s s' : set α) : t.ite s s' \ t = s' \ t :=
ite_inter_compl_self t s s'
@[simp] lemma ite_same (t s : set α) : t.ite s s = s := inter_union_diff _ _
@[simp] lemma ite_left (s t : set α) : s.ite s t = s ∪ t := by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_right (s t : set α) : s.ite t s = t ∩ s := by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_empty (s s' : set α) : set.ite ∅ s s' = s' :=
by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_univ (s s' : set α) : set.ite univ s s' = s :=
by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_empty_left (t s : set α) : t.ite ∅ s = s \ t :=
by simp [set.ite]
@[simp] lemma ite_empty_right (t s : set α) : t.ite s ∅ = s ∩ t :=
by simp [set.ite]
lemma ite_mono (t : set α) {s₁ s₁' s₂ s₂' : set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h' : s₁' ⊆ s₂') :
t.ite s₁ s₁' ⊆ t.ite s₂ s₂' :=
union_subset_union (inter_subset_inter_left _ h) (inter_subset_inter_left _ h')
lemma ite_subset_union (t s s' : set α) : t.ite s s' ⊆ s ∪ s' :=
union_subset_union (inter_subset_left _ _) (diff_subset _ _)
lemma inter_subset_ite (t s s' : set α) : s ∩ s' ⊆ t.ite s s' :=
ite_same t (s ∩ s') ▸ ite_mono _ (inter_subset_left _ _) (inter_subset_right _ _)
lemma ite_inter_inter (t s₁ s₂ s₁' s₂' : set α) :
t.ite (s₁ ∩ s₂) (s₁' ∩ s₂') = t.ite s₁ s₁' ∩ t.ite s₂ s₂' :=
by { ext x, finish [set.ite, iff_def] }
lemma ite_inter (t s₁ s₂ s : set α) :
t.ite (s₁ ∩ s) (s₂ ∩ s) = t.ite s₁ s₂ ∩ s :=
by rw [ite_inter_inter, ite_same]
lemma ite_inter_of_inter_eq (t : set α) {s₁ s₂ s : set α} (h : s₁ ∩ s = s₂ ∩ s) :
t.ite s₁ s₂ ∩ s = s₁ ∩ s :=
by rw [← ite_inter, ← h, ite_same]
lemma subset_ite {t s s' u : set α} : u ⊆ t.ite s s' ↔ u ∩ t ⊆ s ∧ u \ t ⊆ s' :=
begin
simp only [subset_def, ← forall_and_distrib],
refine forall_congr (λ x, _),
by_cases hx : x ∈ t; simp [*, set.ite]
end
/-! ### Inverse image -/
/-- The preimage of `s : set β` by `f : α → β`, written `f ⁻¹' s`,
is the set of `x : α` such that `f x ∈ s`. -/
def preimage {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β) : set α := {x | f x ∈ s}
infix ` ⁻¹' `:80 := preimage
section preimage
variables {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp] theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_preimage {s : set β} {a : α} : (a ∈ f ⁻¹' s) ↔ (f a ∈ s) := iff.rfl
lemma preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : set β} (h : ∀ (x : α), f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s :=
by { congr' with x, apply_assumption }
theorem preimage_mono {s t : set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
assume x hx, h hx
@[simp] theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ := rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ := subset_univ _
@[simp] theorem preimage_inter {s t : set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_union {s t : set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_compl {s : set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : set β) :
f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : set β) :
f ⁻¹' (s.ite t₁ t₂) = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_set_of_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' {a | p a} = {a | p (f a)} :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_id {s : set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_id' {s : set α} : (λ x, x) ⁻¹' s = s := rfl
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : set β} (h : b ∈ s) :
(λ (x : α), b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall $ λ x, h
@[simp] theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : set β} (h : b ∉ s) :
(λ (x : α), b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ λ x hx, h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : set β) [decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(λ (x : α), b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ :=
by { split_ifs with hb hb, exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb] }
theorem preimage_comp {s : set γ} : (g ∘ f) ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) := rfl
lemma preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (λ x, g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : set (subtype p)} {t : set α} :
s = subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ (∀x (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) :=
⟨assume s_eq x h, by { rw [s_eq], simp },
assume h, ext $ λ ⟨x, hx⟩, by simp [h]⟩
lemma preimage_coe_coe_diagonal {α : Type*} (s : set α) :
(prod.map coe coe) ⁻¹' (diagonal α) = diagonal s :=
begin
ext ⟨⟨x, x_in⟩, ⟨y, y_in⟩⟩,
simp [set.diagonal],
end
end preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section image
infix ` '' `:80 := image
theorem mem_image_iff_bex {f : α → β} {s : set α} {y : β} :
y ∈ f '' s ↔ ∃ x (_ : x ∈ s), f x = y := bex_def.symm
theorem mem_image_eq (f : α → β) (s : set α) (y: β) : y ∈ f '' s = ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ f x = y := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_image (f : α → β) (s : set α) (y : β) :
y ∈ f '' s ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ f x = y := iff.rfl
lemma image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (λ x, f x) '' s := rfl
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {x : α} {a : set α} (h : x ∈ a) : f x ∈ f '' a :=
⟨_, h, rfl⟩
theorem _root_.function.injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) {s : set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨λ ⟨b, hb, eq⟩, (hf eq) ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
theorem ball_image_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
by simp
theorem ball_image_of_ball {f : α → β} {s : set α} {p : β → Prop}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) : ∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y :=
ball_image_iff.2 h
theorem bex_image_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ (∃ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
by simp
theorem mem_image_elim {f : α → β} {s : set α} {C : β → Prop} (h : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s → C (f x)) :
∀{y : β}, y ∈ f '' s → C y
| ._ ⟨a, a_in, rfl⟩ := h a a_in
theorem mem_image_elim_on {f : α → β} {s : set α} {C : β → Prop} {y : β} (h_y : y ∈ f '' s)
(h : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s → C (f x)) : C y :=
mem_image_elim h h_y
@[congr] lemma image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : set α}
(h : ∀a∈s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s :=
by safe [ext_iff, iff_def]
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
lemma image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : set α} (h : ∀ (x : α), f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr (λx _, h x)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : set α) : (f ∘ g) '' a = f '' (g '' a) :=
subset.antisymm
(ball_image_of_ball $ assume a ha, mem_image_of_mem _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
(ball_image_of_ball $ ball_image_of_ball $ assume a ha, mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
lemma image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (λ x, g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
theorem image_subset {a b : set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b :=
by finish [subset_def, mem_image_eq]
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : set α) :
f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨by rintro ⟨a, h|h, rfl⟩; [left, right]; exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩,
by rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩); refine ⟨_, _, rfl⟩; [left, right]; exact h⟩
@[simp] theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by { ext, simp }
lemma image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : set α) :
f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ $ inter_subset_left _ _) (image_subset _ $ inter_subset_right _ _)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (h : ∀x∈t, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' s ∩ f '' t = f '' (s ∩ t) :=
subset.antisymm
(assume b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩,
have a₂ = a₁, from h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp *),
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩)
(image_inter_subset _ _ _)
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (H : injective f) :
f '' s ∩ f '' t = f '' (s ∩ t) :=
image_inter_on (assume x _ y _ h, H h)
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall $ by { simpa [image] }
@[simp] theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} :=
by { ext, simp [image, eq_comm] }
@[simp] theorem nonempty.image_const {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (a : β) : (λ _, a) '' s = {a} :=
ext $ λ x, ⟨λ ⟨y, _, h⟩, h ▸ mem_singleton _,
λ h, (eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp (λ y hy, ⟨hy, rfl⟩)⟩
@[simp] lemma image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
by { simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem],
exact ⟨λ H a ha, H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, λ H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩, H _ ha⟩ }
-- TODO(Jeremy): there is an issue with - t unfolding to compl t
theorem mem_compl_image (t : set α) (S : set (set α)) :
t ∈ compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S :=
begin
suffices : ∀ x, xᶜ = t ↔ tᶜ = x, { simp [this] },
intro x, split; { intro e, subst e, simp }
end
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp] lemma image_id' (s : set α) : (λx, x) '' s = s := by { ext, simp }
theorem image_id (s : set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
theorem compl_compl_image (S : set (set α)) :
compl '' (compl '' S) = S :=
by rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α} :
f '' (insert a s) = insert (f a) (f '' s) :=
by { ext, simp [and_or_distrib_left, exists_or_distrib, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm] }
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} :=
by simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(I : left_inverse g f) (s : set α) : f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s :=
λ b ⟨a, h, e⟩, e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(I : left_inverse g f) (s : set β) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s :=
λ b h, ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) :
image f = preimage g :=
funext $ λ s, subset.antisymm
(image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s)
(preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : set α}
(h₁ : left_inverse g f) (h₂ : right_inverse g f) :
b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s :=
by rw image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂; refl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
subset_compl_iff_disjoint.2 $ by simp [image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 $
by { rw ← image_union, simp [image_univ_of_surjective H] }
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : set α} (H : bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : set α) :
f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) :=
begin
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self],
exact image_subset f (subset_union_right t s)
end
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) (s t : set α) :
f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
subset.antisymm
(subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) $ inter_subset_inter_right _ $ image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
lemma nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : set α} : s.nonempty → (f '' s).nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
lemma nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} : (f '' s).nonempty → s.nonempty
| ⟨y, x, hx, _⟩ := ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_image_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
(f '' s).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
⟨nonempty.of_image, λ h, h.image f⟩
lemma nonempty.preimage {s : set β} (hs : s.nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs, ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y in ⟨x, mem_preimage.2 $ hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : set α) [nonempty s] : nonempty (f '' s) :=
(set.nonempty.image f nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp] theorem image_subset_iff {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} :
f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
ball_image_iff
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 (subset.refl _)
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : set α) :
s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) :=
λ x, mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : set α) (h : injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
subset.antisymm
(λ x ⟨y, hy, e⟩, h e ▸ hy)
(subset_preimage_image f s)
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : set β) (h : surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
subset.antisymm
(image_preimage_subset f s)
(λ x hx, let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x in ⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩)
lemma preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
iff.intro
(assume eq, by rw [← image_preimage_eq s hf, ← image_preimage_eq t hf, eq])
(assume eq, eq ▸ rfl)
lemma image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ calc f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ (f '' (f⁻¹' t)) : image_inter_subset _ _ _
... ⊆ f '' s ∩ t : inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t) },
{ rintros _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩,
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s :=
by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp] lemma image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).nonempty :=
by rw [←image_inter_preimage, nonempty_image_iff]
lemma image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β} : f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t :=
by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : set α → set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : set α → Prop} :
compl '' {s | p s} = {s | p sᶜ} :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : set α) (t : set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) :=
λ x h, ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : set α) (t : set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) :=
λ x h, or.elim h (λ l, or.inl $ mem_image_of_mem _ l) (λ r, or.inr r)
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
lemma preimage_subset_iff {A : set α} {B : set β} {f : α → β} :
f⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ (∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A) := iff.rfl
lemma image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
iff.symm $ iff.intro (assume eq, eq ▸ rfl) $ assume eq,
by rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
lemma image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
begin
refine (iff.symm $ iff.intro (image_subset f) $ assume h, _),
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf],
exact preimage_mono h
end
lemma prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : setoid α] (g : quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ quotient.mk) (r : set (β × β)) :
{x : quotient s × quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r} =
(λ a : α × α, (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((λ a : α × α, (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸ set.ext (λ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩, ⟨quotient.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂
(λ a₁ a₂ h, ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩),
λ ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩, show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r, from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := prod.ext_iff.1 h₂,
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩)
/-- Restriction of `f` to `s` factors through `s.image_factorization f : s → f '' s`. -/
def image_factorization (f : α → β) (s : set α) : s → f '' s :=
λ p, ⟨f p.1, mem_image_of_mem f p.2⟩
lemma image_factorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
subtype.val ∘ image_factorization f s = f ∘ subtype.val :=
funext $ λ p, rfl
lemma surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
surjective (image_factorization f s) :=
λ ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
end image
/-! ### Subsingleton -/
/-- A set `s` is a `subsingleton`, if it has at most one element. -/
protected def subsingleton (s : set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ s), x = y
lemma subsingleton.mono (ht : t.subsingleton) (hst : s ⊆ t) : s.subsingleton :=
λ x hx y hy, ht (hst hx) (hst hy)
lemma subsingleton.image (hs : s.subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).subsingleton :=
λ _ ⟨x, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, Hy⟩, Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
lemma subsingleton.eq_singleton_of_mem (hs : s.subsingleton) {x:α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
s = {x} :=
ext $ λ y, ⟨λ hy, (hs hx hy) ▸ mem_singleton _, λ hy, (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm ▸ hx⟩
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_empty : (∅ : set α).subsingleton := λ x, false.elim
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_singleton {a} : ({a} : set α).subsingleton :=
λ x hx y hy, (eq_of_mem_singleton hx).symm ▸ (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm ▸ rfl
lemma subsingleton_iff_singleton {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.subsingleton ↔ s = {x} :=
⟨λ h, h.eq_singleton_of_mem hx, λ h,h.symm ▸ subsingleton_singleton⟩
lemma subsingleton.eq_empty_or_singleton (hs : s.subsingleton) :
s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim or.inl (λ ⟨x, hx⟩, or.inr ⟨x, hs.eq_singleton_of_mem hx⟩)
lemma subsingleton.induction_on {p : set α → Prop} (hs : s.subsingleton) (he : p ∅)
(h₁ : ∀ x, p {x}) : p s :=
by { rcases hs.eq_empty_or_singleton with rfl|⟨x, rfl⟩, exacts [he, h₁ _] }
lemma subsingleton_univ [subsingleton α] : (univ : set α).subsingleton :=
λ x hx y hy, subsingleton.elim x y
lemma subsingleton_of_subsingleton [subsingleton α] {s : set α} : set.subsingleton s :=
subsingleton.mono subsingleton_univ (subset_univ s)
/-- `s`, coerced to a type, is a subsingleton type if and only if `s`
is a subsingleton set. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma subsingleton_coe (s : set α) : subsingleton s ↔ s.subsingleton :=
begin
split,
{ refine λ h, (λ a ha b hb, _),
exact set_coe.ext_iff.2 (@subsingleton.elim s h ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩) },
{ exact λ h, subsingleton.intro (λ a b, set_coe.ext (h a.property b.property)) }
end
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton.preimage {s : set β} (hs : s.subsingleton) {f : α → β}
(hf : function.injective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).subsingleton :=
λ a ha b hb, hf $ hs ha hb
/-- `s` is a subsingleton, if its image of an injective function is. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image {α β : Type*} {f : α → β} (hf : function.injective f)
(s : set α) (hs : (f '' s).subsingleton) : s.subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).mono $ subset_preimage_image _ _
theorem univ_eq_true_false : univ = ({true, false} : set Prop) :=
eq.symm $ eq_univ_of_forall $ classical.cases (by simp) (by simp)
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section range
variables {f : ι → α}
open function
/-- Range of a function.
This function is more flexible than `f '' univ`, as the image requires that the domain is in Type
and not an arbitrary Sort. -/
def range (f : ι → α) : set α := {x | ∃y, f y = x}
@[simp] theorem mem_range {x : α} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_range_self (i : ι) : f i ∈ range f := ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem forall_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ (∀ i, p (f i)) :=
by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨λ H i, H _, λ H ⟨y, i, hi⟩, by { subst hi, apply H }⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ (∃ i, p (f i)) :=
by simp
lemma exists_range_iff' {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ a, a ∈ range f ∧ p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) :=
by simpa only [exists_prop] using exists_range_iff
lemma exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩, by { subst a, exact ⟨i, ha⟩}, λ ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_iff_surjective : range f = univ ↔ surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
alias range_iff_surjective ↔ _ function.surjective.range_eq
@[simp] theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ := range_iff_surjective.2 surjective_id
theorem is_compl_range_inl_range_inr : is_compl (range $ @sum.inl α β) (range sum.inr) :=
⟨by { rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, _⟩⟩, cc },
by { rintro (x|y) -; [left, right]; exact mem_range_self _ }⟩
@[simp] theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range sum.inr = univ :=
is_compl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp] theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range sum.inr = ∅ :=
is_compl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range sum.inl = univ :=
is_compl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp] theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range sum.inl = ∅ :=
is_compl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : sum.inl ⁻¹' range (sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : sum.inr ⁻¹' range (sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (quot.mk r) = univ :=
(surjective_quot_mk r).range_eq
@[simp] theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f :=
by { ext, simp [image, range] }
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f :=
by rw ← image_univ; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
mem_of_mem_of_subset h $ image_subset_range f s
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f :=
subset.antisymm
(forall_range_iff.mpr $ assume i, mem_image_of_mem g (mem_range_self _))
(ball_image_iff.mpr $ forall_range_iff.mpr mem_range_self)
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_range_iff
lemma range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g :=
by rw range_comp; apply image_subset_range
lemma range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).nonempty ↔ nonempty ι :=
⟨λ ⟨y, x, hxy⟩, ⟨x⟩, λ ⟨x⟩, ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
lemma range_nonempty [h : nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp] lemma range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ is_empty ι :=
by rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
lemma range_eq_empty [is_empty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ := range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance [nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : nonempty (range f) := (range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp] lemma image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) :
(f '' s) ∪ (f '' sᶜ) = range f :=
by rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : set β} :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f :=
ext $ assume x, ⟨assume ⟨x, hx, heq⟩, heq ▸ ⟨hx, mem_range_self _⟩,
assume ⟨hx, ⟨y, h_eq⟩⟩, h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f $
show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t, by simp [preimage, h_eq, hx]⟩
lemma image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
by rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hs]
lemma image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by { intro h, rw [← h], apply image_subset_range }, image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
lemma preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x hx, rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩, exact h hx },
intros h x, apply h
end
lemma preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, apply subset.antisymm, rw [←preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h],
rw [←preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h] },
rintro rfl, refl
end
@[simp] theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
set.ext $ λ x, and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s :=
by rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set β} :
f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s :=
by rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, preimage_inter_range]
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_range_eq [setoid α] : range (λx : α, ⟦x⟧) = univ :=
range_iff_surjective.2 quot.exists_rep
lemma range_const_subset {c : α} : range (λx:ι, c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma range_const : ∀ [nonempty ι] {c : α}, range (λx:ι, c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩ c := subset.antisymm range_const_subset $
assume y hy, (mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
lemma diagonal_eq_range {α : Type*} : diagonal α = range (λ x, (x, x)) :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [diagonal, eq_comm] }
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} :
(f ⁻¹' {y}).nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
iff.rfl
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} :
f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans $ not_congr preimage_singleton_nonempty
lemma range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x :=
by simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
lemma image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set β} : f '' ((f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ) = range f \ s :=
by rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
@[simp] theorem range_sigma_mk {β : α → Type*} (a : α) :
range (sigma.mk a : β a → Σ a, β a) = sigma.fst ⁻¹' {a} :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ rintros _ ⟨b, rfl⟩, simp },
{ rintros ⟨x, y⟩ (rfl|_),
exact mem_range_self y }
end
/-- Any map `f : ι → β` factors through a map `range_factorization f : ι → range f`. -/
def range_factorization (f : ι → β) : ι → range f :=
λ i, ⟨f i, mem_range_self i⟩
lemma range_factorization_eq {f : ι → β} :
subtype.val ∘ range_factorization f = f :=
funext $ λ i, rfl
@[simp] lemma range_factorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) :
(range_factorization f a : β) = f a := rfl
lemma surjective_onto_range : surjective (range_factorization f) :=
λ ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩, ⟨i, rfl⟩
lemma image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : set α) : f '' s = range (λ(x : s), f x) :=
by { ext, split, rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩, exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩, rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩, exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ }
@[simp] lemma sum.elim_range {α β γ : Type*} (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) :
range (sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
by simp [set.ext_iff, mem_range]
lemma range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g :=
begin
by_cases h : p, {rw if_pos h, exact subset_union_left _ _},
{rw if_neg h, exact subset_union_right _ _}
end
lemma range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {f g : α → β} :
range (λ x, if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g :=
begin
rw range_subset_iff, intro x, by_cases h : p x,
simp [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range_self],
simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
end
@[simp] lemma preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' (range f) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
/-- The range of a function from a `unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
lemma range_unique [h : unique ι] : range f = {f $ default ι} :=
begin
ext x,
rw mem_range,
split,
{ rintros ⟨i, hi⟩,
rw h.uniq i at hi,
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _ },
{ exact λ h, ⟨default ι, h.symm⟩ }
end
lemma range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : set α) :
range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
λ y ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, ⟨x, λ h, h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (H : injective f) (s : set α) :
range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ :=
subset.antisymm (range_diff_image_subset f s) $ λ y ⟨x, hx, hy⟩, hy ▸
⟨mem_range_self _, λ ⟨x', hx', eq⟩, hx $ H eq ▸ hx'⟩
/-- We can use the axiom of choice to pick a preimage for every element of `range f`. -/
noncomputable def range_splitting (f : α → β) : range f → α := λ x, x.2.some
-- This can not be a `@[simp]` lemma because the head of the left hand side is a variable.
lemma apply_range_splitting (f : α → β) (x : range f) : f (range_splitting f x) = x :=
x.2.some_spec
attribute [irreducible] range_splitting
@[simp] lemma comp_range_splitting (f : α → β) : f ∘ range_splitting f = coe :=
by { ext, simp only [function.comp_app], apply apply_range_splitting, }
-- When `f` is injective, see also `equiv.of_injective`.
lemma left_inverse_range_splitting (f : α → β) :
left_inverse (range_factorization f) (range_splitting f) :=
λ x, by { ext, simp only [range_factorization_coe], apply apply_range_splitting, }
lemma range_splitting_injective (f : α → β) : injective (range_splitting f) :=
(left_inverse_range_splitting f).injective
lemma is_compl_range_some_none (α : Type*) :
is_compl (range (some : α → option α)) {none} :=
⟨λ x ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, (hn : x = none)⟩, option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn),
λ x hx, option.cases_on x (or.inr rfl) (λ x, or.inl $ mem_range_self _)⟩
@[simp] lemma compl_range_some (α : Type*) :
(range (some : α → option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(is_compl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
@[simp] lemma range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(is_compl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(is_compl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
end range
/-- The set `s` is pairwise `r` if `r x y` for all *distinct* `x y ∈ s`. -/
def pairwise_on (s : set α) (r : α → α → Prop) := ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → r x y
lemma pairwise_on_of_forall (s : set α) (p : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ (a b : α), p a b) :
pairwise_on s p :=
λ a _ b _ _, h a b
lemma pairwise_on.imp_on {s : set α} {p q : α → α → Prop}
(h : pairwise_on s p) (hpq : pairwise_on s (λ ⦃a b : α⦄, p a b → q a b)) : pairwise_on s q :=
λ a ha b hb hab, hpq a ha b hb hab (h a ha b hb hab)
lemma pairwise_on.imp {s : set α} {p q : α → α → Prop}
(h : pairwise_on s p) (hpq : ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, p a b → q a b) : pairwise_on s q :=
h.imp_on (pairwise_on_of_forall s _ hpq)
theorem pairwise_on.mono {s t : set α} {r}
(h : t ⊆ s) (hp : pairwise_on s r) : pairwise_on t r :=
λ x xt y yt, hp x (h xt) y (h yt)
theorem pairwise_on.mono' {s : set α} {r r' : α → α → Prop}
(H : r ≤ r') (hp : pairwise_on s r) : pairwise_on s r' :=
hp.imp H
theorem pairwise_on_top (s : set α) :
pairwise_on s ⊤ :=
pairwise_on_of_forall s _ (λ a b, trivial)
protected lemma subsingleton.pairwise_on (h : s.subsingleton) (r : α → α → Prop) :
pairwise_on s r :=
λ x hx y hy hne, (hne (h hx hy)).elim
@[simp] lemma pairwise_on_empty (r : α → α → Prop) :
(∅ : set α).pairwise_on r :=
subsingleton_empty.pairwise_on r
@[simp] lemma pairwise_on_singleton (a : α) (r : α → α → Prop) :
pairwise_on {a} r :=
subsingleton_singleton.pairwise_on r
theorem nonempty.pairwise_on_iff_exists_forall {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) {f : α → β}
{r : β → β → Prop} [is_equiv β r] :
(pairwise_on s (r on f)) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, r (f x) z :=
begin
fsplit,
{ rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine λ H, ⟨f y, λ x hx, _⟩,
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl|hne,
{ apply is_refl.refl },
{ exact H _ hx _ hy hne } },
{ rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ x hx y hy hne,
exact @is_trans.trans β r _ (f x) z (f y) (hz _ hx) (is_symm.symm _ _ $ hz _ hy) }
end
/-- For a nonempty set `s`, a function `f` takes pairwise equal values on `s` if and only if
for some `z` in the codomain, `f` takes value `z` on all `x ∈ s`. See also
`set.pairwise_on_eq_iff_exists_eq` for a version that assumes `[nonempty β]` instead of
`set.nonempty s`. -/
theorem nonempty.pairwise_on_eq_iff_exists_eq {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) {f : α → β} :
(pairwise_on s (λ x y, f x = f y)) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = z :=
hs.pairwise_on_iff_exists_forall
lemma pairwise_on_iff_exists_forall [nonempty β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) {r : β → β → Prop}
[is_equiv β r] :
(pairwise_on s (r on f)) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, r (f x) z :=
begin
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|hne,
{ simp },
{ exact hne.pairwise_on_iff_exists_forall }
end
/-- A function `f : α → β` with nonempty codomain takes pairwise equal values on a set `s` if and
only if for some `z` in the codomain, `f` takes value `z` on all `x ∈ s`. See also
`set.nonempty.pairwise_on_eq_iff_exists_eq` for a version that assumes `set.nonempty s` instead of
`[nonempty β]`. -/
lemma pairwise_on_eq_iff_exists_eq [nonempty β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) :
(pairwise_on s (λ x y, f x = f y)) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = z :=
pairwise_on_iff_exists_forall s f
lemma pairwise_on_union {α} {s t : set α} {r : α → α → Prop} :
(s ∪ t).pairwise_on r ↔
s.pairwise_on r ∧ t.pairwise_on r ∧ ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a :=
begin
simp only [pairwise_on, mem_union_eq, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib],
exact ⟨λ H, ⟨H.1.1, H.2.2, H.2.1, λ x hx y hy hne, H.1.2 y hy x hx hne.symm⟩,
λ H, ⟨⟨H.1, λ x hx y hy hne, H.2.2.2 y hy x hx hne.symm⟩, H.2.2.1, H.2.1⟩⟩
end
lemma pairwise_on_union_of_symmetric {α} {s t : set α} {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : symmetric r) :
(s ∪ t).pairwise_on r ↔
s.pairwise_on r ∧ t.pairwise_on r ∧ ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), a ≠ b → r a b :=
pairwise_on_union.trans $ by simp only [hr.iff, and_self]
lemma pairwise_on_insert {α} {s : set α} {a : α} {r : α → α → Prop} :
(insert a s).pairwise_on r ↔ s.pairwise_on r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a :=
by simp only [insert_eq, pairwise_on_union, pairwise_on_singleton, true_and,
mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq]
lemma pairwise_on_insert_of_symmetric {α} {s : set α} {a : α} {r : α → α → Prop}
(hr : symmetric r) :
(insert a s).pairwise_on r ↔ s.pairwise_on r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b :=
by simp only [pairwise_on_insert, hr.iff a, and_self]
lemma pairwise_on_pair {r : α → α → Prop} {x y : α} :
pairwise_on {x, y} r ↔ (x ≠ y → r x y ∧ r y x) :=
by simp [pairwise_on_insert]
lemma pairwise_on_pair_of_symmetric {r : α → α → Prop} {x y : α} (hr : symmetric r) :
pairwise_on {x, y} r ↔ (x ≠ y → r x y) :=
by simp [pairwise_on_insert_of_symmetric hr]
end set
open set
namespace function
variables {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {f : α → β}
lemma surjective.preimage_injective (hf : surjective f) : injective (preimage f) :=
assume s t, (preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
lemma injective.preimage_image (hf : injective f) (s : set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
lemma injective.preimage_surjective (hf : injective f) : surjective (preimage f) :=
by { intro s, use f '' s, rw hf.preimage_image }
lemma injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : injective f) {s : set α} :
(f '' s).subsingleton ↔ s.subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, λ h, h.image f⟩
lemma surjective.image_preimage (hf : surjective f) (s : set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
lemma surjective.image_surjective (hf : surjective f) : surjective (image f) :=
by { intro s, use f ⁻¹' s, rw hf.image_preimage }
lemma surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : surjective f) {s : set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
by rw [← nonempty_image_iff, hf.image_preimage]
lemma injective.image_injective (hf : injective f) : injective (image f) :=
by { intros s t h, rw [←preimage_image_eq s hf, ←preimage_image_eq t hf, h] }
lemma surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : set β} (hf : surjective f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
by { apply preimage_subset_preimage_iff, rw [hf.range_eq], apply subset_univ }
lemma surjective.range_comp {ι' : Sort*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
range (g ∘ f) = range g :=
ext $ λ y, (@surjective.exists _ _ _ hf (λ x, g x = y)).symm
lemma injective.nonempty_apply_iff {f : set α → set β} (hf : injective f)
(h2 : f ∅ = ∅) {s : set α} : (f s).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
by rw [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty, ← h2, ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty, hf.ne_iff]
lemma injective.mem_range_iff_exists_unique (hf : injective f) {b : β} :
b ∈ range f ↔ ∃! a, f a = b :=
⟨λ ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨a, h, λ a' ha, hf (ha.trans h.symm)⟩, exists_unique.exists⟩
lemma injective.exists_unique_of_mem_range (hf : injective f) {b : β} (hb : b ∈ range f) :
∃! a, f a = b :=
hf.mem_range_iff_exists_unique.mp hb
lemma left_inverse.image_image {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse g f) (s : set α) :
g '' (f '' s) = s :=
by rw [← image_comp, h.comp_eq_id, image_id]
lemma left_inverse.preimage_preimage {g : β → α} (h : left_inverse g f) (s : set α) :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = s :=
by rw [← preimage_comp, h.comp_eq_id, preimage_id]
end function
open function
/-! ### Image and preimage on subtypes -/
namespace subtype
variable {α : Type*}
lemma coe_image {p : α → Prop} {s : set (subtype p)} :
coe '' s = {x | ∃h : p x, (⟨x, h⟩ : subtype p) ∈ s} :=
set.ext $ assume a,
⟨assume ⟨⟨a', ha'⟩, in_s, h_eq⟩, h_eq ▸ ⟨ha', in_s⟩,
assume ⟨ha, in_s⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, in_s, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_image_of_subset {s t : set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : coe '' {x : ↥s | ↑x ∈ t} = t :=
begin
ext x,
rw set.mem_image,
exact ⟨λ ⟨x', hx', hx⟩, hx ▸ hx', λ hx, ⟨⟨x, h hx⟩, hx, rfl⟩⟩,
end
lemma range_coe {s : set α} :
range (coe : s → α) = s :=
by { rw ← set.image_univ, simp [-set.image_univ, coe_image] }
/-- A variant of `range_coe`. Try to use `range_coe` if possible.
This version is useful when defining a new type that is defined as the subtype of something.
In that case, the coercion doesn't fire anymore. -/
lemma range_val {s : set α} :
range (subtype.val : s → α) = s :=
range_coe
/-- We make this the simp lemma instead of `range_coe`. The reason is that if we write
for `s : set α` the function `coe : s → α`, then the inferred implicit arguments of `coe` are
`coe α (λ x, x ∈ s)`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_coe_subtype {p : α → Prop} :
range (coe : subtype p → α) = {x | p x} :=
range_coe
@[simp] lemma coe_preimage_self (s : set α) : (coe : s → α) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
by rw [← preimage_range (coe : s → α), range_coe]
lemma range_val_subtype {p : α → Prop} :
range (subtype.val : subtype p → α) = {x | p x} :=
range_coe
theorem coe_image_subset (s : set α) (t : set s) : coe '' t ⊆ s :=
λ x ⟨y, yt, yvaleq⟩, by rw ←yvaleq; exact y.property
theorem coe_image_univ (s : set α) : (coe : s → α) '' set.univ = s :=
image_univ.trans range_coe
@[simp] theorem image_preimage_coe (s t : set α) :
(coe : s → α) '' (coe ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ s :=
image_preimage_eq_inter_range.trans $ congr_arg _ range_coe
theorem image_preimage_val (s t : set α) :
(subtype.val : s → α) '' (subtype.val ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ s :=
image_preimage_coe s t
theorem preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff {s t u : set α} :
((coe : s → α) ⁻¹' t = coe ⁻¹' u) ↔ t ∩ s = u ∩ s :=
begin
rw [←image_preimage_coe, ←image_preimage_coe],
split, { intro h, rw h },
intro h, exact coe_injective.image_injective h
end
theorem preimage_val_eq_preimage_val_iff (s t u : set α) :
((subtype.val : s → α) ⁻¹' t = subtype.val ⁻¹' u) ↔ (t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :=
preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff
lemma exists_set_subtype {t : set α} (p : set α → Prop) :
(∃(s : set t), p (coe '' s)) ↔ ∃(s : set α), s ⊆ t ∧ p s :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨s, hs⟩, refine ⟨coe '' s, _, hs⟩,
convert image_subset_range _ _, rw [range_coe] },
rintro ⟨s, hs₁, hs₂⟩, refine ⟨coe ⁻¹' s, _⟩,
rw [image_preimage_eq_of_subset], exact hs₂, rw [range_coe], exact hs₁
end
lemma preimage_coe_nonempty {s t : set α} : ((coe : s → α) ⁻¹' t).nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).nonempty :=
by rw [inter_comm, ← image_preimage_coe, nonempty_image_iff]
lemma preimage_coe_eq_empty {s t : set α} : (coe : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ∅ ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
by simp only [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, preimage_coe_nonempty]
@[simp] lemma preimage_coe_compl (s : set α) : (coe : s → α) ⁻¹' sᶜ = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (inter_compl_self s)
@[simp] lemma preimage_coe_compl' (s : set α) : (coe : sᶜ → α) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (compl_inter_self s)
end subtype
namespace set
/-! ### Lemmas about cartesian product of sets -/
section prod
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables {s s₁ s₂ : set α} {t t₁ t₂ : set β}
/-- The cartesian product `prod s t` is the set of `(a, b)`
such that `a ∈ s` and `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def prod (s : set α) (t : set β) : set (α × β) :=
{p | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t}
lemma prod_eq (s : set α) (t : set β) : s.prod t = prod.fst ⁻¹' s ∩ prod.snd ⁻¹' t := rfl
theorem mem_prod_eq {p : α × β} : p ∈ s.prod t = (p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_prod {p : α × β} : p ∈ s.prod t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ s.prod t = (a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t) := rfl
lemma mk_mem_prod {a : α} {b : β} (a_in : a ∈ s) (b_in : b ∈ t) : (a, b) ∈ s.prod t :=
⟨a_in, b_in⟩
theorem prod_mono {s₁ s₂ : set α} {t₁ t₂ : set β} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁.prod t₁ ⊆ s₂.prod t₂ :=
assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
lemma prod_subset_iff {P : set (α × β)} :
(s.prod t ⊆ P) ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨λ h _ xin _ yin, h (mk_mem_prod xin yin), λ h ⟨_, _⟩ pin, h _ pin.1 _ pin.2⟩
lemma forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ s.prod t, p x) ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
lemma exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ s.prod t, p x) ↔ ∃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), p (x, y) :=
by simp [and_assoc]
@[simp] theorem prod_empty : s.prod ∅ = (∅ : set (α × β)) :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] theorem empty_prod : set.prod ∅ t = (∅ : set (α × β)) :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] theorem univ_prod_univ : (@univ α).prod (@univ β) = univ :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp }
lemma univ_prod {t : set β} : set.prod (univ : set α) t = prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
by simp [prod_eq]
lemma prod_univ {s : set α} : set.prod s (univ : set β) = prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] theorem singleton_prod {a : α} : set.prod {a} t = prod.mk a '' t :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and.left_comm, eq_comm] }
@[simp] theorem prod_singleton {b : β} : s.prod {b} = (λ a, (a, b)) '' s :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and.left_comm, eq_comm] }
theorem singleton_prod_singleton {a : α} {b : β} : set.prod {a} {b} = ({(a, b)} : set (α × β)) :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂).prod t = s₁.prod t ∪ s₂.prod t :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [or_and_distrib_right] }
@[simp] theorem prod_union : s.prod (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s.prod t₁ ∪ s.prod t₂ :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and_or_distrib_left] }
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁.prod t₁ ∩ s₂.prod t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂).prod (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and_assoc, and.left_comm] }
theorem insert_prod {a : α} : (insert a s).prod t = (prod.mk a '' t) ∪ s.prod t :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [image, iff_def, or_imp_distrib, imp.swap] {contextual := tt} }
theorem prod_insert {b : β} : s.prod (insert b t) = ((λa, (a, b)) '' s) ∪ s.prod t :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [image, iff_def, or_imp_distrib, imp.swap] {contextual := tt} }
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).prod (g ⁻¹' t) = (λ p, (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s.prod t := rfl
lemma prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} : (f ⁻¹' s).prod t = (λp, (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' (s.prod t) := rfl
lemma prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} : s.prod (g ⁻¹' t) = (λp, (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' (s.prod t) := rfl
lemma preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : set β) (t : set δ) :
prod.map f g ⁻¹' (s.prod t) = (f ⁻¹' s).prod (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
lemma mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(λ x, (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s.prod t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_preimage_prod_left {y : β} (h : y ∈ t) : (λ x, (x, y)) ⁻¹' s.prod t = s :=
by { ext x, simp [h] }
@[simp] lemma mk_preimage_prod_right {x : α} (h : x ∈ s) : prod.mk x ⁻¹' s.prod t = t :=
by { ext y, simp [h] }
@[simp] lemma mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty {y : β} (hy : y ∉ t) :
(λ x, (x, y)) ⁻¹' s.prod t = ∅ :=
by { ext z, simp [hy] }
@[simp] lemma mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty {x : α} (hx : x ∉ s) :
prod.mk x ⁻¹' s.prod t = ∅ :=
by { ext z, simp [hx] }
lemma mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if {y : β} [decidable_pred (∈ t)] :
(λ x, (x, y)) ⁻¹' s.prod t = if y ∈ t then s else ∅ :=
by { split_ifs; simp [h] }
lemma mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if {x : α} [decidable_pred (∈ s)] :
prod.mk x ⁻¹' s.prod t = if x ∈ s then t else ∅ :=
by { split_ifs; simp [h] }
lemma mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if {y : β} [decidable_pred (∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(λ x, (f x, y)) ⁻¹' s.prod t = if y ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ :=
by rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
lemma mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if {x : α} [decidable_pred (∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(λ y, (x, g y)) ⁻¹' s.prod t = if x ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ :=
by rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@prod.swap α β) = preimage prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse prod.swap_left_inverse prod.swap_right_inverse
theorem preimage_swap_prod {s : set α} {t : set β} : prod.swap ⁻¹' t.prod s = s.prod t :=
by { ext ⟨x, y⟩, simp [and_comm] }
theorem image_swap_prod : prod.swap '' t.prod s = s.prod t :=
by rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s).prod (m₂ '' t) = image (λp:α×β, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (s.prod t) :=
ext $ by simp [-exists_and_distrib_right, exists_and_distrib_right.symm, and.left_comm,
and.assoc, and.comm]
theorem prod_range_range_eq {α β γ δ} {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(range m₁).prod (range m₂) = range (λp:α×β, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) :=
ext $ by simp [range]
@[simp] theorem range_prod_map {α β γ δ} {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range (prod.map m₁ m₂) = (range m₁).prod (range m₂) :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {α β γ} {m₁ : α → γ} :
(range m₁).prod (univ : set β) = range (λp:α×β, (m₁ p.1, p.2)) :=
ext $ by simp [range]
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {α β δ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : set α).prod (range m₂) = range (λp:α×β, (p.1, m₂ p.2)) :=
ext $ by simp [range]
lemma range_pair_subset {α β γ : Type*} (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
range (λ x, (f x, g x)) ⊆ (range f).prod (range g) :=
have (λ x, (f x, g x)) = prod.map f g ∘ (λ x, (x, x)), from funext (λ x, rfl),
by { rw [this, ← range_prod_map], apply range_comp_subset_range }
theorem nonempty.prod : s.nonempty → t.nonempty → (s.prod t).nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ := ⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
theorem nonempty.fst : (s.prod t).nonempty → s.nonempty
| ⟨p, hp⟩ := ⟨p.1, hp.1⟩
theorem nonempty.snd : (s.prod t).nonempty → t.nonempty
| ⟨p, hp⟩ := ⟨p.2, hp.2⟩
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s.prod t).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty ∧ t.nonempty :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, λ h, nonempty.prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff :
s.prod t = ∅ ↔ (s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅) :=
by simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_distrib]
lemma prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s.prod t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W :=
by simp [subset_def]
lemma fst_image_prod_subset (s : set α) (t : set β) :
prod.fst '' (s.prod t) ⊆ s :=
λ _ h, let ⟨_, ⟨h₂, _⟩, h₁⟩ := (set.mem_image _ _ _).1 h in h₁ ▸ h₂
lemma prod_subset_preimage_fst (s : set α) (t : set β) :
s.prod t ⊆ prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
image_subset_iff.1 (fst_image_prod_subset s t)
lemma fst_image_prod (s : set β) {t : set α} (ht : t.nonempty) :
prod.fst '' (s.prod t) = s :=
set.subset.antisymm (fst_image_prod_subset _ _)
$ λ y y_in, let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := ht in
⟨(y, x), ⟨y_in, x_in⟩, rfl⟩
lemma snd_image_prod_subset (s : set α) (t : set β) :
prod.snd '' (s.prod t) ⊆ t :=
λ _ h, let ⟨_, ⟨_, h₂⟩, h₁⟩ := (set.mem_image _ _ _).1 h in h₁ ▸ h₂
lemma prod_subset_preimage_snd (s : set α) (t : set β) :
s.prod t ⊆ prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
image_subset_iff.1 (snd_image_prod_subset s t)
lemma snd_image_prod {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (t : set β) :
prod.snd '' (s.prod t) = t :=
set.subset.antisymm (snd_image_prod_subset _ _)
$ λ y y_in, let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := hs in
⟨(x, y), ⟨x_in, y_in⟩, rfl⟩
lemma prod_diff_prod : s.prod t \ s₁.prod t₁ = s.prod (t \ t₁) ∪ (s \ s₁).prod t :=
by { ext x, by_cases h₁ : x.1 ∈ s₁; by_cases h₂ : x.2 ∈ t₁; simp * }
/-- A product set is included in a product set if and only factors are included, or a factor of the
first set is empty. -/
lemma prod_subset_prod_iff :
(s.prod t ⊆ s₁.prod t₁) ↔ (s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁) ∨ (s = ∅) ∨ (t = ∅) :=
begin
classical,
cases (s.prod t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h] },
{ have st : s.nonempty ∧ t.nonempty, by rwa [prod_nonempty_iff] at h,
split,
{ assume H : s.prod t ⊆ s₁.prod t₁,
have h' : s₁.nonempty ∧ t₁.nonempty := prod_nonempty_iff.1 (h.mono H),
refine or.inl ⟨_, _⟩,
show s ⊆ s₁,
{ have := image_subset (prod.fst : α × β → α) H,
rwa [fst_image_prod _ st.2, fst_image_prod _ h'.2] at this },
show t ⊆ t₁,
{ have := image_subset (prod.snd : α × β → β) H,
rwa [snd_image_prod st.1, snd_image_prod h'.1] at this } },
{ assume H,
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, or_false] at H,
exact prod_mono H.1 H.2 } }
end
end prod
/-! ### Lemmas about set-indexed products of sets -/
section pi
variables {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {s s₁ : set ι} {t t₁ t₂ : Π i, set (α i)}
/-- Given an index set `ι` and a family of sets `t : Π i, set (α i)`, `pi s t`
is the set of dependent functions `f : Πa, π a` such that `f a` belongs to `t a`
whenever `a ∈ s`. -/
def pi (s : set ι) (t : Π i, set (α i)) : set (Π i, α i) := { f | ∀i ∈ s, f i ∈ t i }
@[simp] lemma mem_pi {f : Π i, α i} : f ∈ s.pi t ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, f i ∈ t i :=
by refl
@[simp] lemma mem_univ_pi {f : Π i, α i} : f ∈ pi univ t ↔ ∀ i, f i ∈ t i :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma empty_pi (s : Π i, set (α i)) : pi ∅ s = univ := by { ext, simp [pi] }
@[simp] lemma pi_univ (s : set ι) : pi s (λ i, (univ : set (α i))) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall $ λ f i hi, mem_univ _
lemma pi_mono (h : ∀ i ∈ s, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : pi s t₁ ⊆ pi s t₂ :=
λ x hx i hi, (h i hi $ hx i hi)
lemma pi_inter_distrib : s.pi (λ i, t i ∩ t₁ i) = s.pi t ∩ s.pi t₁ :=
ext $ λ x, by simp only [forall_and_distrib, mem_pi, mem_inter_eq]
lemma pi_congr (h : s = s₁) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, t i = t₁ i) : pi s t = pi s₁ t₁ :=
h ▸ (ext $ λ x, forall_congr $ λ i, forall_congr $ λ hi, h' i hi ▸ iff.rfl)
lemma pi_eq_empty {i : ι} (hs : i ∈ s) (ht : t i = ∅) : s.pi t = ∅ :=
by { ext f, simp only [mem_empty_eq, not_forall, iff_false, mem_pi, not_imp],
exact ⟨i, hs, by simp [ht]⟩ }
lemma univ_pi_eq_empty {i : ι} (ht : t i = ∅) : pi univ t = ∅ :=
pi_eq_empty (mem_univ i) ht
lemma pi_nonempty_iff : (s.pi t).nonempty ↔ ∀ i, ∃ x, i ∈ s → x ∈ t i :=
by simp [classical.skolem, set.nonempty]
lemma univ_pi_nonempty_iff : (pi univ t).nonempty ↔ ∀ i, (t i).nonempty :=
by simp [classical.skolem, set.nonempty]
lemma pi_eq_empty_iff : s.pi t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, (α i → false) ∨ (i ∈ s ∧ t i = ∅) :=
begin
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, pi_nonempty_iff], push_neg, apply exists_congr, intro i,
split,
{ intro h, by_cases hα : nonempty (α i),
{ cases hα with x, refine or.inr ⟨(h x).1, by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, h]⟩ },
{ exact or.inl (λ x, hα ⟨x⟩) }},
{ rintro (h|h) x, exfalso, exact h x, simp [h] }
end
lemma univ_pi_eq_empty_iff : pi univ t = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, t i = ∅ :=
by simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, univ_pi_nonempty_iff]
@[simp] lemma univ_pi_empty [h : nonempty ι] : pi univ (λ i, ∅ : Π i, set (α i)) = ∅ :=
univ_pi_eq_empty_iff.2 $ h.elim $ λ x, ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma range_dcomp {β : ι → Type*} (f : Π i, α i → β i) :
range (λ (g : Π i, α i), (λ i, f i (g i))) = pi univ (λ i, range (f i)) :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ i -,
exact ⟨x i, rfl⟩ },
{ intros x hx,
choose y hy using hx,
exact ⟨λ i, y i trivial, funext $ λ i, hy i trivial⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma insert_pi (i : ι) (s : set ι) (t : Π i, set (α i)) :
pi (insert i s) t = (eval i ⁻¹' t i) ∩ pi s t :=
by { ext, simp [pi, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] }
@[simp] lemma singleton_pi (i : ι) (t : Π i, set (α i)) :
pi {i} t = (eval i ⁻¹' t i) :=
by { ext, simp [pi] }
lemma singleton_pi' (i : ι) (t : Π i, set (α i)) : pi {i} t = {x | x i ∈ t i} :=
singleton_pi i t
lemma pi_if {p : ι → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] (s : set ι) (t₁ t₂ : Π i, set (α i)) :
pi s (λ i, if p i then t₁ i else t₂ i) = pi {i ∈ s | p i} t₁ ∩ pi {i ∈ s | ¬ p i} t₂ :=
begin
ext f,
split,
{ assume h, split; { rintros i ⟨his, hpi⟩, simpa [*] using h i } },
{ rintros ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩ i his,
by_cases p i; simp * at * }
end
lemma union_pi : (s ∪ s₁).pi t = s.pi t ∩ s₁.pi t :=
by simp [pi, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, set_of_and]
@[simp] lemma pi_inter_compl (s : set ι) : pi s t ∩ pi sᶜ t = pi univ t :=
by rw [← union_pi, union_compl_self]
lemma pi_update_of_not_mem [decidable_eq ι] {β : Π i, Type*} {i : ι} (hi : i ∉ s) (f : Π j, α j)
(a : α i) (t : Π j, α j → set (β j)) :
s.pi (λ j, t j (update f i a j)) = s.pi (λ j, t j (f j)) :=
pi_congr rfl $ λ j hj, by { rw update_noteq, exact λ h, hi (h ▸ hj) }
lemma pi_update_of_mem [decidable_eq ι] {β : Π i, Type*} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (f : Π j, α j)
(a : α i) (t : Π j, α j → set (β j)) :
s.pi (λ j, t j (update f i a j)) = {x | x i ∈ t i a} ∩ (s \ {i}).pi (λ j, t j (f j)) :=
calc s.pi (λ j, t j (update f i a j)) = ({i} ∪ s \ {i}).pi (λ j, t j (update f i a j)) :
by rw [union_diff_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 hi)]
... = {x | x i ∈ t i a} ∩ (s \ {i}).pi (λ j, t j (f j)) :
by { rw [union_pi, singleton_pi', update_same, pi_update_of_not_mem], simp }
lemma univ_pi_update [decidable_eq ι] {β : Π i, Type*} (i : ι) (f : Π j, α j)
(a : α i) (t : Π j, α j → set (β j)) :
pi univ (λ j, t j (update f i a j)) = {x | x i ∈ t i a} ∩ pi {i}ᶜ (λ j, t j (f j)) :=
by rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, ← pi_update_of_mem (mem_univ _)]
lemma univ_pi_update_univ [decidable_eq ι] (i : ι) (s : set (α i)) :
pi univ (update (λ j : ι, (univ : set (α j))) i s) = eval i ⁻¹' s :=
by rw [univ_pi_update i (λ j, (univ : set (α j))) s (λ j t, t), pi_univ, inter_univ, preimage]
open_locale classical
lemma eval_image_pi {i : ι} (hs : i ∈ s) (ht : (s.pi t).nonempty) : eval i '' s.pi t = t i :=
begin
ext x, rcases ht with ⟨f, hf⟩, split,
{ rintro ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩, exact hg i hs },
{ intro hg, refine ⟨update f i x, _, by simp⟩,
intros j hj, by_cases hji : j = i,
{ subst hji, simp [hg] },
{ rw [mem_pi] at hf, simp [hji, hf, hj] }},
end
@[simp] lemma eval_image_univ_pi {i : ι} (ht : (pi univ t).nonempty) :
(λ f : Π i, α i, f i) '' pi univ t = t i :=
eval_image_pi (mem_univ i) ht
lemma eval_preimage {ι} {α : ι → Type*} {i : ι} {s : set (α i)} :
eval i ⁻¹' s = pi univ (update (λ i, univ) i s) :=
by { ext x, simp [@forall_update_iff _ (λ i, set (α i)) _ _ _ _ (λ i' y, x i' ∈ y)] }
lemma eval_preimage' {ι} {α : ι → Type*} {i : ι} {s : set (α i)} :
eval i ⁻¹' s = pi {i} (update (λ i, univ) i s) :=
by { ext, simp }
lemma update_preimage_pi {i : ι} {f : Π i, α i} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hf : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → f j ∈ t j) : (update f i) ⁻¹' s.pi t = t i :=
begin
ext x, split,
{ intro h, convert h i hi, simp },
{ intros hx j hj, by_cases h : j = i,
{ cases h, simpa },
{ rw [update_noteq h], exact hf j hj h }}
end
lemma update_preimage_univ_pi {i : ι} {f : Π i, α i} (hf : ∀ j ≠ i, f j ∈ t j) :
(update f i) ⁻¹' pi univ t = t i :=
update_preimage_pi (mem_univ i) (λ j _, hf j)
lemma subset_pi_eval_image (s : set ι) (u : set (Π i, α i)) : u ⊆ pi s (λ i, eval i '' u) :=
λ f hf i hi, ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩
lemma univ_pi_ite (s : set ι) (t : Π i, set (α i)) :
pi univ (λ i, if i ∈ s then t i else univ) = s.pi t :=
by { ext, simp_rw [mem_univ_pi], apply forall_congr, intro i, split_ifs; simp [h] }
end pi
/-! ### Lemmas about `inclusion`, the injection of subtypes induced by `⊆` -/
section inclusion
variable {α : Type*}
/-- `inclusion` is the "identity" function between two subsets `s` and `t`, where `s ⊆ t` -/
def inclusion {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s → t :=
λ x : s, (⟨x, h x.2⟩ : t)
@[simp] lemma inclusion_self {s : set α} (x : s) :
inclusion (set.subset.refl _) x = x :=
by { cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma inclusion_right {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (x : t) (m : (x : α) ∈ s) :
inclusion h ⟨x, m⟩ = x :=
by { cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma inclusion_inclusion {s t u : set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (htu : t ⊆ u)
(x : s) : inclusion htu (inclusion hst x) = inclusion (set.subset.trans hst htu) x :=
by { cases x, refl }
@[simp] lemma coe_inclusion {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (x : s) :
(inclusion h x : α) = (x : α) := rfl
lemma inclusion_injective {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
function.injective (inclusion h)
| ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ := subtype.ext_iff_val.2 ∘ subtype.ext_iff_val.1
@[simp] lemma range_inclusion {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
range (inclusion h) = {x : t | (x:α) ∈ s} :=
by { ext ⟨x, hx⟩, simp [inclusion] }
lemma eq_of_inclusion_surjective {s t : set α} {h : s ⊆ t}
(h_surj : function.surjective (inclusion h)) : s = t :=
begin
rw [← range_iff_surjective, range_inclusion, eq_univ_iff_forall] at h_surj,
exact set.subset.antisymm h (λ x hx, h_surj ⟨x, hx⟩)
end
end inclusion
/-! ### Injectivity and surjectivity lemmas for image and preimage -/
section image_preimage
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β}
@[simp]
lemma preimage_injective : injective (preimage f) ↔ surjective f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h y, _, surjective.preimage_injective⟩,
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : (f ⁻¹' {y}).nonempty,
{ rw [h.nonempty_apply_iff preimage_empty], apply singleton_nonempty },
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
end
@[simp]
lemma preimage_surjective : surjective (preimage f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h x x' hx, _, injective.preimage_surjective⟩,
cases h {x} with s hs, have := mem_singleton x,
rwa [← hs, mem_preimage, hx, ← mem_preimage, hs, mem_singleton_iff, eq_comm] at this
end
@[simp] lemma image_surjective : surjective (image f) ↔ surjective f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h y, _, surjective.image_surjective⟩,
cases h {y} with s hs,
have := mem_singleton y, rw [← hs] at this, rcases this with ⟨x, h1x, h2x⟩,
exact ⟨x, h2x⟩
end
@[simp] lemma image_injective : injective (image f) ↔ injective f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h x x' hx, _, injective.image_injective⟩,
rw [← singleton_eq_singleton_iff], apply h,
rw [image_singleton, image_singleton, hx]
end
lemma preimage_eq_iff_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : bijective f) {s t} :
f ⁻¹' s = t ↔ s = f '' t :=
by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
lemma eq_preimage_iff_image_eq {f : α → β} (hf : bijective f) {s t} :
s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ f '' s = t :=
by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
end image_preimage
/-! ### Lemmas about images of binary and ternary functions -/
section n_ary_image
variables {α β γ δ ε : Type*} {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
variables {s s' : set α} {t t' : set β} {u u' : set γ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c c' : γ} {d d' : δ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `set α → set β → set γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`.
-/
def image2 (f : α → β → γ) (s : set α) (t : set β) : set γ :=
{c | ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t ∧ f a b = c }
lemma mem_image2_eq : c ∈ image2 f s t = ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t ∧ f a b = c := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_image2 : c ∈ image2 f s t ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t ∧ f a b = c := iff.rfl
lemma mem_image2_of_mem (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ t) : f a b ∈ image2 f s t :=
⟨a, b, h1, h2, rfl⟩
lemma mem_image2_iff (hf : injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image2 f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t :=
⟨ by { rintro ⟨a', b', ha', hb', h⟩, rcases hf h with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, exact ⟨ha', hb'⟩ },
λ ⟨ha, hb⟩, mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
/-- image2 is monotone with respect to `⊆`. -/
lemma image2_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t' :=
by { rintro _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩, exact mem_image2_of_mem (hs ha) (ht hb) }
lemma forall_image2_iff {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image2 f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), p (f x y) :=
⟨λ h x hx y hy, h _ ⟨x, y, hx, hy, rfl⟩, λ h z ⟨x, y, hx, hy, hz⟩, hz ▸ h x hx y hy⟩
@[simp] lemma image2_subset_iff {u : set γ} :
image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y ∈ u :=
forall_image2_iff
lemma image2_union_left : image2 f (s ∪ s') t = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s' t :=
begin
ext c, split,
{ rintros ⟨a, b, h1a|h2a, hb, rfl⟩;[left, right]; exact ⟨_, _, ‹_›, ‹_›, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩|⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩); refine ⟨_, _, _, ‹_›, rfl⟩; simp [mem_union, *] }
end
lemma image2_union_right : image2 f s (t ∪ t') = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s t' :=
begin
ext c, split,
{ rintros ⟨a, b, ha, h1b|h2b, rfl⟩;[left, right]; exact ⟨_, _, ‹_›, ‹_›, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro (⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩|⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩); refine ⟨_, _, ‹_›, _, rfl⟩; simp [mem_union, *] }
end
@[simp] lemma image2_empty_left : image2 f ∅ t = ∅ := ext $ by simp
@[simp] lemma image2_empty_right : image2 f s ∅ = ∅ := ext $ by simp
lemma image2_inter_subset_left : image2 f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s' t :=
by { rintro _ ⟨a, b, ⟨h1a, h2a⟩, hb, rfl⟩, split; exact ⟨_, _, ‹_›, ‹_›, rfl⟩ }
lemma image2_inter_subset_right : image2 f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s t' :=
by { rintro _ ⟨a, b, ha, ⟨h1b, h2b⟩, rfl⟩, split; exact ⟨_, _, ‹_›, ‹_›, rfl⟩ }
@[simp] lemma image2_singleton_left : image2 f {a} t = f a '' t :=
ext $ λ x, by simp
@[simp] lemma image2_singleton_right : image2 f s {b} = (λ a, f a b) '' s :=
ext $ λ x, by simp
lemma image2_singleton : image2 f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
@[congr] lemma image2_congr (h : ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b = f' a b) :
image2 f s t = image2 f' s t :=
by { ext, split; rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩; refine ⟨a, b, ha, hb, by rw h a ha b hb⟩ }
/-- A common special case of `image2_congr` -/
lemma image2_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image2 f s t = image2 f' s t :=
image2_congr (λ a _ b _, h a b)
/-- The image of a ternary function `f : α → β → γ → δ` as a function
`set α → set β → set γ → set δ`. Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the
corresponding function `α × β × γ → δ`.
-/
def image3 (g : α → β → γ → δ) (s : set α) (t : set β) (u : set γ) : set δ :=
{d | ∃ a b c, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t ∧ c ∈ u ∧ g a b c = d }
@[simp] lemma mem_image3 : d ∈ image3 g s t u ↔ ∃ a b c, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t ∧ c ∈ u ∧ g a b c = d :=
iff.rfl
@[congr] lemma image3_congr (h : ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t) (c ∈ u), g a b c = g' a b c) :
image3 g s t u = image3 g' s t u :=
by { ext x,
split; rintro ⟨a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, rfl⟩; exact ⟨a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, by rw h a ha b hb c hc⟩ }
/-- A common special case of `image3_congr` -/
lemma image3_congr' (h : ∀ a b c, g a b c = g' a b c) : image3 g s t u = image3 g' s t u :=
image3_congr (λ a _ b _ c _, h a b c)
lemma image2_image2_left (f : δ → γ → ε) (g : α → β → δ) :
image2 f (image2 g s t) u = image3 (λ a b c, f (g a b) c) s t u :=
begin
ext, split,
{ rintro ⟨_, c, ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩, hc, rfl⟩, refine ⟨a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, rfl⟩, refine ⟨_, c, ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩, hc, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma image2_image2_right (f : α → δ → ε) (g : β → γ → δ) :
image2 f s (image2 g t u) = image3 (λ a b c, f a (g b c)) s t u :=
begin
ext, split,
{ rintro ⟨a, _, ha, ⟨b, c, hb, hc, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, refine ⟨a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, rfl⟩, refine ⟨a, _, ha, ⟨b, c, hb, hc, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma image2_assoc {ε'} {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → ε' → ε} {g' : β → γ → ε'}
(h_assoc : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = f' a (g' b c)) :
image2 f (image2 g s t) u = image2 f' s (image2 g' t u) :=
by simp only [image2_image2_left, image2_image2_right, h_assoc]
lemma image_image2 (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
g '' image2 f s t = image2 (λ a b, g (f a b)) s t :=
begin
ext, split,
{ rintro ⟨_, ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, refine ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩, refine ⟨_, ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma image2_image_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
image2 f (g '' s) t = image2 (λ a b, f (g a) b) s t :=
begin
ext, split,
{ rintro ⟨_, b, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩, hb, rfl⟩, refine ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩, refine ⟨_, b, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩, hb, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma image2_image_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
image2 f s (g '' t) = image2 (λ a b, f a (g b)) s t :=
begin
ext, split,
{ rintro ⟨a, _, ha, ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, refine ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩, refine ⟨a, _, ha, ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ }
end
lemma image2_swap (f : α → β → γ) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
image2 f s t = image2 (λ a b, f b a) t s :=
by { ext, split; rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩; refine ⟨b, a, hb, ha, rfl⟩ }
@[simp] lemma image2_left (h : t.nonempty) : image2 (λ x y, x) s t = s :=
by simp [nonempty_def.mp h, ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma image2_right (h : s.nonempty) : image2 (λ x y, y) s t = t :=
by simp [nonempty_def.mp h, ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma image_prod (f : α → β → γ) : (λ x : α × β, f x.1 x.2) '' s.prod t = image2 f s t :=
set.ext $ λ a,
⟨ by { rintros ⟨_, _, rfl⟩, exact ⟨_, _, (mem_prod.mp ‹_›).1, (mem_prod.mp ‹_›).2, rfl⟩ },
by { rintros ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩, exact ⟨(_, _), mem_prod.mpr ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩, rfl⟩ }⟩
lemma nonempty.image2 (hs : s.nonempty) (ht : t.nonempty) : (image2 f s t).nonempty :=
by { cases hs with a ha, cases ht with b hb, exact ⟨f a b, ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩⟩ }
end n_ary_image
end set
namespace subsingleton
variables {α : Type*} [subsingleton α]
lemma eq_univ_of_nonempty {s : set α} : s.nonempty → s = univ :=
λ ⟨x, hx⟩, eq_univ_of_forall $ λ y, subsingleton.elim x y ▸ hx
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma set_cases {p : set α → Prop} (h0 : p ∅) (h1 : p univ) (s) : p s :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ h0) $ λ h, (eq_univ_of_nonempty h).symm ▸ h1
lemma mem_iff_nonempty {α : Type*} [subsingleton α] {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ s ↔ s.nonempty :=
⟨λ hx, ⟨x, hx⟩, λ ⟨y, hy⟩, subsingleton.elim y x ▸ hy⟩
end subsingleton
|
62986ad91235735c10c0d56afd40a6fc47976aaf | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Quotation/Util.lean | 684a6004e1061b77e74e7325011bdb7594b01f7a | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,536 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sebastian Ullrich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Elab.Term
namespace Lean.Elab.Term.Quotation
open Lean.Syntax
register_builtin_option hygiene : Bool := {
defValue := true
descr := "Annotate identifiers in quotations such that they are resolved relative to the scope at their declaration, not that at their eventual use/expansion, to avoid accidental capturing. Note that quotations/notations already defined are unaffected."
}
partial def getAntiquotationIds (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Syntax) := do
let mut ids := #[]
for stx in stx.topDown do
if (isAntiquot stx || isTokenAntiquot stx) && !isEscapedAntiquot stx then
let anti := getAntiquotTerm stx
if anti.isIdent then ids := ids.push anti
else throwErrorAt stx "complex antiquotation not allowed here"
return ids
-- Get all pattern vars (as `Syntax.ident`s) in `stx`
partial def getPatternVars (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Syntax) :=
if stx.isQuot then
getAntiquotationIds stx
else match stx with
| `(_) => #[]
| `($id:ident) => #[id]
| `($id:ident@$e) => do (← getPatternVars e).push id
| _ => throwErrorAt stx "unsupported pattern in syntax match{indentD stx}"
partial def getPatternsVars (pats : Array Syntax) : TermElabM (Array Syntax) :=
pats.foldlM (fun vars pat => do return vars ++ (← getPatternVars pat)) #[]
end Lean.Elab.Term.Quotation
|
f88c27736d6716e0b5bcc53739319f32fb01c6fd | 86f6f4f8d827a196a32bfc646234b73328aeb306 | /examples/basics/unnamed_1200.lean | 5e8c14cfabbe6b4fefa85c072cb88568b15f178f | [] | no_license | jamescheuk91/mathematics_in_lean | 09f1f87d2b0dce53464ff0cbe592c568ff59cf5e | 4452499264e2975bca2f42565c0925506ba5dda3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,716,410,967 | 1,613,957,947,000 | 1,613,957,947,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 161 | lean | import analysis.special_functions.exp_log
open real
-- BEGIN
example (a b : ℝ) (h : a ≤ b) : exp a ≤ exp b :=
begin
rw exp_le_exp,
exact h
end
-- END |
18336bff2e71e20457fda6150b4fb6f87f85d9ba | ba4794a0deca1d2aaa68914cd285d77880907b5c | /src/game/world2/level1.lean | 46ce82027e74c06de9ad562f65e10b9e1a95a662 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/natural_number_game | c7c00aa1f6a95004286fd456ed13cf6e113159ce | 9d09925424da9f6275e6cfe427c8bcf12bb0944f | refs/heads/master | 1,600,715,773,528 | 1,573,910,462,000 | 1,573,910,462,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,877 | lean | import mynat.definition -- Imports the natural numbers.
import mynat.add -- imports addition.
namespace mynat -- hide
-- World name : Addition world
/- Axiom : add_zero (a : mynat) :
a + 0 = a
-/
/- Axiom : add_succ (a b : mynat) :
a + succ(b) = succ(a + b)
-/
/- Tactic : induction
## Summary
if `n : mynat` is in our assumptions, then `induction n with d hd`
attempts to prove the goal by induction on `n`, with the inductive
assumption in the `succ` case being `hd`.
## Details
If you have a natural number `n : mynat` in your context
(above the `⊢`) then `induction n with d hd` turns your
goal into two goals, a base case with `n = 0` and
an inductive step where `hd` is a proof of the `n = d`
case and your goal is the `n = succ(d)` case.
### Example:
If this is our local context:
```
n : mynat
⊢ 2 * n = n + n
```
then
`induction n with d hd`
will give us two goals:
```
⊢ 2 * 0 = 0 + 0
```
and
```
d : mynat,
hd : 2 * d = d + d
⊢ 2 * succ d = succ d + succ d
```
-/
/-
# Addition World.
Welcome to Addition World. If you've done all four levels in tutorial world
and know about `rw` and `refl`, then you're in the right place. Here's
a reminder of the things you're now equipped with which we'll need in this world.
## Data:
* a type called `mynat`
* a term `0 : mynat`, interpreted as the number zero.
* a function `succ : mynat → mynat`, with `succ n` interpreted as "the number after `n`".
* Usual numerical notation 0,1,2 etc (although 2 onwards will be of no use to us ;-) ).
* Addition (with notation `a + b`).
## Theorems:
* `add_zero (a : mynat) : a + 0 = a`
* `add_succ (a b : mynat) : a + succ(b) = succ(a + b)`
* The principle of mathematical induction. Use with `induction` (see below)
## Tactics:
* `refl` -- proves goals of the form `X = X`
* `rw h` -- if h is a proof of `A = B`, changes all A's in the goal to B's.
* `induction n with d hd` -- we're going to learn this right now.
# Important thing:
This is a *really* good time to check you understand about the box on the left with the drop down
menus. All the theorems and all the tactics above are documented there. You can find
all you need to know about what theorems you have collected in Theorem statements -> Addition world.
Have a click around and check that you can find statements of the theorems above, and explanations of
the tactics above. As we go through the game, these lists will grow. The box on the left
will prove invaluable as the number of theorems we prove gets bigger. On the other hand,
we only need to learn one more tactic to really start going places, so let's learn about
that tactic right now.
## Level 1: the `induction` tactic.
OK so let's see induction in action. We're going to prove
`zero_add (n : mynat) : 0 + n = n`.
That is: for all natural numbers $n$, $0+n=n$. Wait -- what is going on here?
Didn't we already prove that adding zero to $n$ gave us $n$?
No we didn't! We proved $n + 0 = n$ -- that proof was called `add_zero`. We're now
trying to establish `zero_add`, the proof that $0 + n = n$. But aren't these two theorems
the same? No they're not! It is *true* that `x + y = y + x`, but we haven't
*proved* it yet, and in fact we will need both `add_zero` and `zero_add` in order
to prove this. In fact `x + y = y + x` is the boss level for addition world,
and `induction` is the only other tactic you'll need to beat it.
Now `add_zero` is one of Peano's axioms, so we don't need to prove it, we already have it
(indeed, if you've opened the Addition World theorem statements on the left, you can even see it).
To prove `0 + n = n` we need to use induction on $n$. While we're here,
note that `zero_add` is about zero add something, and `add_zero` is about something add zero.
The names of the proofs tell you what the theorems are. Anyway, let's prove `0 + n = n`.
Delete `sorry` and replace it with `induction n with d hd,`
and **don't forget the comma**. Hit enter, wait for Lean to finish thinking,
and let's see what we have.
When Lean has finished thinking, we see that we now have *two goals*! The
induction tactic has generated for us a base case with `n = 0` (the goal at the top)
and an inductive step (the goal underneath). The golden rule: **Tactics operate on the first goal** --
the goal at the top. So let's just worry about that top goal now, the base case `⊢ 0 + 0 = 0`.
Remember that `add_zero` (the proof we have already) is the proof of `x + 0 = x`
(for any $x$) so we can try
`rw add_zero,`
. What do you think the goal will
change to? Remember to just keep
focussing on the top goal, ignore the other one for now, it's not changing
and we're not working on it. You should be able to solve the top goal yourself
now with `refl`.
When you solved this base case goal, we are now be back down
to one goal -- the inductive step. Take a look at the
text below the lemma to see an explanation of this goal.
-/
/- Lemma
For all natual numbers $n$, we have
$$0 + n = n.$$
-/
lemma zero_add (n : mynat) : 0 + n = n :=
begin [less_leaky]
induction n with d hd,
rw add_zero,
refl,
rw add_succ,
rw hd,
refl
end
/-
We're in the successor case, and your top right box should look
something like this:
```
case mynat.succ
d : mynat,
hd : 0 + d = d
⊢ 0 + succ d = succ d
```
*Important:* make sure that you only have one goal at this point. You
should have proved `0 + 0 = 0` by now. Tactics only operate on the top goal.
The first line just reminds us we're doing the inductive step.
We have a fixed natural number `d`, and the inductive hypothesis `hd : 0 + d = d`
saying that we have a proof of `0 + d = d`.
Our goal is to prove `0 + succ d = succ d`. In words, we're showing that
if the lemma is true for `d`, then it's also true for the number after `d`.
That's the inductive step. Once we've proved this inductive step, we will have proved
`zero_add` by the principle of mathematical induction.
To prove our goal, we need to use `add_succ`. We know that `add_succ 0 d`
is the result that `0 + succ d = succ (0 + d)`, so the first thing
we need to do is to replace the left hand side `0 + succ d` of our
goal with the right hand side. We do this with the `rw` command. You can write
`rw add_succ,`
(or even `rw add_succ 0 d,` if you want to give Lean all the inputs instead of making it
figure them out itself). Don't forget the comma though. Hit enter. The goal should change to
`⊢ succ (0 + d) = succ d`
Now remember our inductive hypothesis `hd : 0 + d = d`. We need
to rewrite this too! Type
`rw hd,`
(don't forget the comma). The goal will now change to
`⊢ succ d = succ d`
This goal can be solved with the `refl` tactic. After you apply it,
Lean will inform you that there are no goals left. You are done!
## Now venture off on your own.
Those three tactics --
* `induction n with d hd,`
* `rw h,`
* `refl,`
will get you quite a long way through this game. Using only these tactics
you can beat Addition World level 4 (the boss level of Addition World),
all of Multiplication World including the boss level `a * b = b * a`,
and even all of Power World including the fiendish final boss. This route will
give you a good grounding in these three basic tactics; after that, if you
are still interested, there are other worlds to master, where you can learn
more tactics.
But we're getting ahead of ourselves, you still have to beat the rest of Addition World.
We're going to stop explaining stuff carefully now. If you get stuck or want
to know more about Lean (e.g. how to do much harder maths in Lean),
ask in `#new members` at
<a href="https://leanprover.zulipchat.com" target="blank">the Lean chat</a>
(login required, real name preferred). Kevin or Mohammad or one of the other
people there might be able to help.
Good luck! Click on "next level" to solve some levels on your own.
-/
end mynat -- hide |
20a894ae8ee4269e2846671a6130243443ea2d00 | fe7174aadb02f3f5a6781c52facd5ebcbb35105c | /src/14.Inductive_Definitions/Data_Types/mynat.lean | 6dfcf818bb400e04e66bf17d9dc458afc45e28b9 | [] | no_license | tcmch/cs-dm-lean | 1ea180c6ff15e4e9a3ea78f2608506924e34e922 | 16ef75c7e68077e265441acc16cf5fe643db911b | refs/heads/master | 1,586,377,195,552 | 1,544,118,724,000 | 1,544,118,724,000 | 159,694,678 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,029 | lean | namespace mynat
/-
Our own implementation of nat
-/
inductive mynat : Type
| zero : mynat
| succ : mynat → mynat
/-
Convenient names for first few terms -/
def zero := mynat.zero
def one := mynat.succ zero
def two := mynat.succ one
def three :=
mynat.succ
(mynat.succ
(mynat.succ
zero))
#reduce one
#reduce two
#reduce three
/-
Unary functions
-/
-- identity function on mynat
def id_mynat (n: mynat) := n
-- constant zero function
def zero_mynat (n: mynat) := zero
-- predecessor function
def pred (n : mynat) :=
match n with
| mynat.zero := zero
| mynat.succ n' := n'
end
#reduce pred three
#reduce pred zero
def pred' (n: mynat) :=
match n with
| mynat.succ n' := n'
| _ := zero
end
example: pred = pred' := rfl
/-
There are two new and important
concepts here. The first is a new
kind of matching. The second is
that we define the predecessor
of zero to be zero. That's a bit
odd.
Look at the matching. The first
pattern is familar. The second,
though, it interesting. If we get
here, we know n isn't zero, so it
must by the successor of the next
smaller mynat. Here we give that
next smaller value the name n'.
And of course that's the number
we want to return as precessor!
-/
/-
Now let's see binary operations
and recursive functions. To
define a recursive function we
have a new syntax/
-/
def add_mynat: mynat → mynat → mynat
| mynat.zero m := m
| (mynat.succ n') m :=
mynat.succ (add_mynat n' m)
#reduce add_mynat three two
/-
Syntax notes: use explicit function
type syntax. Omit any :=. Define how
the function works by cases. Each case
defines what the function does for the
specific kinds of arguments used in the
case. Omit commas between arguments
All cases may be covered
-/
-- It works!
#reduce add_mynat one two
#reduce add_mynat three three
/-
EXERCISES:
(1) We just implemented addition as
the recursive (iterated) application
of the successor function. Now you are
to implement multiplication as iterated
addition.
(2) Implement exponentiation as iterated
multiplication.
(3) Take this pattern one step further.
What function did you implement? How
would you write it in regular math
notation?
-/
def mul_mynat: mynat → mynat → mynat
| mynat.zero m := zero
| (mynat.succ n') m := add_mynat m (mul_mynat n' m)
#reduce mul_mynat three three
def exp_mynat : mynat → mynat → mynat
| n mynat.zero := one
| n (mynat.succ m') := mul_mynat n (exp_mynat n m')
#reduce exp_mynat three three
#reduce exp_mynat two three
--#reduce mul_mynat three two
--#reduce mul_mynat three three
/-
We can easily prove that for all m : ℕ,
add_mynat 0 m = m, because the definition
of add_mynat has a matching pattern (the
first one), which explains exactly how to
reduce a term with first argument zero.
-/
theorem zero_left_id:
∀ m : mynat,
add_mynat mynat.zero m = m
:=
begin
intro m,
--apply rfl,
simp [add_mynat],
end
/-
We just asked Lean to simplify the
goal using the "simplication rules"
specified by the two cases in the
definition of add_mynat. The result
is m = m, which Lean takes care of
with an automated application of rfl.
-/
/-
Unfortunately, we don't have such
a simplification rule when the zero
is on the right! For that we need a
whole new proof strategy: proof by
induction.
-/
theorem zero_right_id :
∀ m : mynat,
add_mynat m mynat.zero = m
:=
begin
intro m,
/-
cases m,
apply rfl,
-/
induction m with m' h,
-- base case
apply rfl,
--simp [add_mynat],
-- inductive case
simp [add_mynat],
assumption,
end
lemma add_n_succ_m :
∀ n m : mynat,
add_mynat n (mynat.succ m) =
mynat.succ (add_mynat n m) :=
begin
intros n m,
induction n with n' h,
apply rfl,
simp [add_mynat],
assumption,
end
/-
Property verification: our addition
operation is commutative!
-/
example :
∀ m n : mynat,
add_mynat m n = add_mynat n m :=
begin
intros m n,
-- by induction on m
induction m with m' h,
--base case: m = zero
simp [add_mynat],
rw zero_right_id,
-- inductive case:
-- if true for m then true for succ m
simp [add_mynat],
rw add_n_succ_m,
-- rewrite using induction hypothesis!
rw h,
end
example :
∀ m n : mynat,
add_mynat m n = add_mynat n m :=
begin
intros m n,
induction m with m' h,
simp [zero_left_id],
simp [zero_right_id],
simp [add_mynat],
sorry
end
/-
Proof by induction is proof by
case analysis on the *constructors*
for values of a given type, with the
huge added benefit of an induction
hypothesis.
So, as an example, if we show that
some predicate involving a natural
number, n, is true no matter what
*constructor* was used to "build"
n, then we've' shown the predicate to
be true for *all* (∀) values of n,
because there are no n other than
those that can be built by the given
constructors. Proving a proposition
is true for all constructors is thus
tantamount to showing that it is
true for all values, even if there
are infinitely many.
Let's think about the two
constructors for values of type
mynat. First, there is the zero
constructor. That's the "base
case". Second, there's the succ
constructor. From a value, n,
it constructs a value, succ n.
Now if we prove the following two
cases, we're done:
(1) the predicate in question is
true when n is zero
(2) if the predicate is true for
any n, then it is true for succ n.
The reason we're done is that
there are no other possibilities
for n.
The set of values of an inductively
defined type is defined to be exactly
the set of values that can be built
by using the available constructors
any *finite* number of times, and
that there are no other values of
the given type.
-/
/-
EXERCISE: try this proof using
cases instead of induction. Cases
also does case analysis on the
constructors. Why does simple case
analysis fail?
-/
/-
EXERCISES: To Come Shortly
-/
end mynat
|
e2ca0f7a2a5fb0329fcd7aa251d6dfeeaf605d49 | 2eab05920d6eeb06665e1a6df77b3157354316ad | /src/analysis/special_functions/trigonometric/basic.lean | 7351f011d0b981801bb87ba134cfbef6bbb495dd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ayush1801/mathlib | 78949b9f789f488148142221606bf15c02b960d2 | ce164e28f262acbb3de6281b3b03660a9f744e3c | refs/heads/master | 1,692,886,907,941 | 1,635,270,866,000 | 1,635,270,866,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 82,255 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv
import data.set.intervals.infinite
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.inverse` and
`analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `analysis.special_functions.complex.arg` and
`analysis.special_functions.complex.log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity and differentiability of the usual trigonometric functions are proved, and their
derivatives are computed.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space filter
open set filter
namespace complex
/-- The complex sine function is everywhere strictly differentiable, with the derivative `cos x`. -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_sin (x : ℂ) : has_strict_deriv_at sin (cos x) x :=
begin
simp only [cos, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((((has_strict_deriv_at_id x).neg.mul_const I).cexp.sub
((has_strict_deriv_at_id x).mul_const I).cexp).mul_const I).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
simp only [function.comp, id],
rw [sub_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, I_mul_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg, mul_one, one_mul, mul_assoc,
I_mul_I, mul_neg_one, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm]
end
/-- The complex sine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `cos x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_sin (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at sin (cos x) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_sin x).has_deriv_at
lemma times_cont_diff_sin {n} : times_cont_diff ℂ n sin :=
(((times_cont_diff_neg.mul times_cont_diff_const).cexp.sub
(times_cont_diff_id.mul times_cont_diff_const).cexp).mul times_cont_diff_const).div_const
lemma differentiable_sin : differentiable ℂ sin :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sin x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sin {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ sin x :=
differentiable_sin x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin : deriv sin = cos :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sin x).deriv
@[continuity] lemma continuous_sin : continuous sin :=
by { change continuous (λ z, ((exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I) / 2), continuity, }
lemma continuous_on_sin {s : set ℂ} : continuous_on sin s := continuous_sin.continuous_on
/-- The complex cosine function is everywhere strictly differentiable, with the derivative
`-sin x`. -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_cos (x : ℂ) : has_strict_deriv_at cos (-sin x) x :=
begin
simp only [sin, div_eq_mul_inv, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul],
convert (((has_strict_deriv_at_id x).mul_const I).cexp.add
((has_strict_deriv_at_id x).neg.mul_const I).cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
simp only [function.comp, id],
ring
end
/-- The complex cosine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative `-sin x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_cos (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at cos (-sin x) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_cos x).has_deriv_at
lemma times_cont_diff_cos {n} : times_cont_diff ℂ n cos :=
((times_cont_diff_id.mul times_cont_diff_const).cexp.add
(times_cont_diff_neg.mul times_cont_diff_const).cexp).div_const
lemma differentiable_cos : differentiable ℂ cos :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cos x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cos {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
lemma deriv_cos {x : ℂ} : deriv cos x = -sin x :=
(has_deriv_at_cos x).deriv
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos' : deriv cos = (λ x, -sin x) :=
funext $ λ x, deriv_cos
@[continuity] lemma continuous_cos : continuous cos :=
by { change continuous (λ z, (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2), continuity, }
lemma continuous_on_cos {s : set ℂ} : continuous_on cos s := continuous_cos.continuous_on
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function is everywhere strictly differentiable, with the derivative
`cosh x`. -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_sinh (x : ℂ) : has_strict_deriv_at sinh (cosh x) x :=
begin
simp only [cosh, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((has_strict_deriv_at_exp x).sub (has_strict_deriv_at_id x).neg.cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
rw [id, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
end
/-- The complex hyperbolic sine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative
`cosh x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_sinh (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at sinh (cosh x) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_sinh x).has_deriv_at
lemma times_cont_diff_sinh {n} : times_cont_diff ℂ n sinh :=
(times_cont_diff_exp.sub times_cont_diff_neg.cexp).div_const
lemma differentiable_sinh : differentiable ℂ sinh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sinh {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ sinh x :=
differentiable_sinh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh : deriv sinh = cosh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).deriv
@[continuity] lemma continuous_sinh : continuous sinh :=
by { change continuous (λ z, (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2), continuity, }
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function is everywhere strictly differentiable, with the
derivative `sinh x`. -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_cosh (x : ℂ) : has_strict_deriv_at cosh (sinh x) x :=
begin
simp only [sinh, div_eq_mul_inv],
convert ((has_strict_deriv_at_exp x).add (has_strict_deriv_at_id x).neg.cexp).mul_const (2:ℂ)⁻¹,
rw [id, mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
end
/-- The complex hyperbolic cosine function is everywhere differentiable, with the derivative
`sinh x`. -/
lemma has_deriv_at_cosh (x : ℂ) : has_deriv_at cosh (sinh x) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_cosh x).has_deriv_at
lemma times_cont_diff_cosh {n} : times_cont_diff ℂ n cosh :=
(times_cont_diff_exp.add times_cont_diff_neg.cexp).div_const
lemma differentiable_cosh : differentiable ℂ cosh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cosh {x : ℂ} : differentiable_at ℂ cosh x :=
differentiable_cosh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh : deriv cosh = sinh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).deriv
@[continuity] lemma continuous_cosh : continuous cosh :=
by { change continuous (λ z, (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2), continuity, }
end complex
section
/-! ### Simp lemmas for derivatives of `λ x, complex.cos (f x)` etc., `f : ℂ → ℂ` -/
variables {f : ℂ → ℂ} {f' x : ℂ} {s : set ℂ}
/-! #### `complex.cos` -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.ccos (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.ccos (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.ccos (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_ccos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.cos (f x)) s x = - complex.sin (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccos.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_ccos (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.cos (f x)) x = - complex.sin (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccos.deriv
/-! #### `complex.sin` -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.csin (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.csin (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.csin (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_csin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.sin (f x)) s x = complex.cos (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csin.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_csin (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.sin (f x)) x = complex.cos (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csin.deriv
/-! #### `complex.cosh` -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.ccosh (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.ccosh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.ccosh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_ccosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) s x = complex.sinh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.ccosh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_ccosh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) x = complex.sinh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.ccosh.deriv
/-! #### `complex.sinh` -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.csinh (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.csinh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.csinh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) * f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_csinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) s x = complex.cosh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.csinh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_csinh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
deriv (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) x = complex.cosh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.csinh.deriv
end
section
/-! ### Simp lemmas for derivatives of `λ x, complex.cos (f x)` etc., `f : E → ℂ` -/
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℂ E] {f : E → ℂ} {f' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : set E}
/-! #### `complex.cos` -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.ccos (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.ccos (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.ccos (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) (- complex.sin (f x) • f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.ccos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.ccos.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.ccos (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.ccos.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.ccos (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).ccos
@[simp] lemma differentiable.ccos (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).ccos
lemma fderiv_within_ccos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
fderiv_within ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) s x = - complex.sin (f x) • (fderiv_within ℂ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.ccos.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_ccos (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
fderiv ℂ (λx, complex.cos (f x)) x = - complex.sin (f x) • (fderiv ℂ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.ccos.fderiv
lemma times_cont_diff.ccos {n} (h : times_cont_diff ℂ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℂ n (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cos.comp h
lemma times_cont_diff_at.ccos {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℂ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℂ n (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) x :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cos.times_cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_on.ccos {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℂ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℂ n (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) s :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cos.comp_times_cont_diff_on hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.ccos {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℂ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℂ n (λ x, complex.cos (f x)) s x :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cos.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
/-! #### `complex.sin` -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.csin (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.csin (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.csin (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) (complex.cos (f x) • f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.csin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.csin.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.csin (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.csin.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.csin (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).csin
@[simp] lemma differentiable.csin (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).csin
lemma fderiv_within_csin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
fderiv_within ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) s x = complex.cos (f x) • (fderiv_within ℂ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.csin.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_csin (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
fderiv ℂ (λx, complex.sin (f x)) x = complex.cos (f x) • (fderiv ℂ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.csin.fderiv
lemma times_cont_diff.csin {n} (h : times_cont_diff ℂ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℂ n (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sin.comp h
lemma times_cont_diff_at.csin {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℂ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℂ n (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) x :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sin.times_cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_on.csin {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℂ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℂ n (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) s :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sin.comp_times_cont_diff_on hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.csin {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℂ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℂ n (λ x, complex.sin (f x)) s x :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sin.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
/-! #### `complex.cosh` -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.ccosh (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.ccosh (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.ccosh (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) (complex.sinh (f x) • f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.ccosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.ccosh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.ccosh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.ccosh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.ccosh (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).ccosh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.ccosh (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).ccosh
lemma fderiv_within_ccosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
fderiv_within ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) s x = complex.sinh (f x) • (fderiv_within ℂ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.ccosh.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_ccosh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
fderiv ℂ (λx, complex.cosh (f x)) x = complex.sinh (f x) • (fderiv ℂ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.ccosh.fderiv
lemma times_cont_diff.ccosh {n} (h : times_cont_diff ℂ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℂ n (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cosh.comp h
lemma times_cont_diff_at.ccosh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℂ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℂ n (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) x :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cosh.times_cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_on.ccosh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℂ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℂ n (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) s :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cosh.comp_times_cont_diff_on hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.ccosh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℂ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℂ n (λ x, complex.cosh (f x)) s x :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cosh.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
/-! #### `complex.sinh` -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.csinh (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.csinh (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) • f') x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.csinh (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) (complex.cosh (f x) • f') s x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.csinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℂ (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.csinh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.csinh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
differentiable_at ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.csinh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.csinh (hc : differentiable_on ℂ f s) :
differentiable_on ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).csinh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.csinh (hc : differentiable ℂ f) :
differentiable ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).csinh
lemma fderiv_within_csinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℂ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℂ s x) :
fderiv_within ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) s x = complex.cosh (f x) • (fderiv_within ℂ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.csinh.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_csinh (hc : differentiable_at ℂ f x) :
fderiv ℂ (λx, complex.sinh (f x)) x = complex.cosh (f x) • (fderiv ℂ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.csinh.fderiv
lemma times_cont_diff.csinh {n} (h : times_cont_diff ℂ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℂ n (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sinh.comp h
lemma times_cont_diff_at.csinh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℂ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℂ n (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) x :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sinh.times_cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_on.csinh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℂ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℂ n (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) s :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sinh.comp_times_cont_diff_on hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.csinh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℂ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℂ n (λ x, complex.sinh (f x)) s x :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sinh.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
end
namespace real
variables {x y z : ℝ}
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_sin (x : ℝ) : has_strict_deriv_at sin (cos x) x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_sin x).real_of_complex
lemma has_deriv_at_sin (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at sin (cos x) x :=
(has_strict_deriv_at_sin x).has_deriv_at
lemma times_cont_diff_sin {n} : times_cont_diff ℝ n sin :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sin.real_of_complex
lemma differentiable_sin : differentiable ℝ sin :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sin x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sin : differentiable_at ℝ sin x :=
differentiable_sin x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin : deriv sin = cos :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sin x).deriv
@[continuity] lemma continuous_sin : continuous sin :=
complex.continuous_re.comp (complex.continuous_sin.comp complex.continuous_of_real)
lemma continuous_on_sin {s} : continuous_on sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuous_on
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_cos (x : ℝ) : has_strict_deriv_at cos (-sin x) x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cos x).real_of_complex
lemma has_deriv_at_cos (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at cos (-sin x) x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cos x).real_of_complex
lemma times_cont_diff_cos {n} : times_cont_diff ℝ n cos :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cos.real_of_complex
lemma differentiable_cos : differentiable ℝ cos :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cos x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cos : differentiable_at ℝ cos x :=
differentiable_cos x
lemma deriv_cos : deriv cos x = - sin x :=
(has_deriv_at_cos x).deriv
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos' : deriv cos = (λ x, - sin x) :=
funext $ λ _, deriv_cos
@[continuity] lemma continuous_cos : continuous cos :=
complex.continuous_re.comp (complex.continuous_cos.comp complex.continuous_of_real)
lemma continuous_on_cos {s} : continuous_on cos s := continuous_cos.continuous_on
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_sinh (x : ℝ) : has_strict_deriv_at sinh (cosh x) x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_sinh x).real_of_complex
lemma has_deriv_at_sinh (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at sinh (cosh x) x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_sinh x).real_of_complex
lemma times_cont_diff_sinh {n} : times_cont_diff ℝ n sinh :=
complex.times_cont_diff_sinh.real_of_complex
lemma differentiable_sinh : differentiable ℝ sinh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_sinh : differentiable_at ℝ sinh x :=
differentiable_sinh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh : deriv sinh = cosh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_sinh x).deriv
@[continuity] lemma continuous_sinh : continuous sinh :=
complex.continuous_re.comp (complex.continuous_sinh.comp complex.continuous_of_real)
lemma has_strict_deriv_at_cosh (x : ℝ) : has_strict_deriv_at cosh (sinh x) x :=
(complex.has_strict_deriv_at_cosh x).real_of_complex
lemma has_deriv_at_cosh (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at cosh (sinh x) x :=
(complex.has_deriv_at_cosh x).real_of_complex
lemma times_cont_diff_cosh {n} : times_cont_diff ℝ n cosh :=
complex.times_cont_diff_cosh.real_of_complex
lemma differentiable_cosh : differentiable ℝ cosh :=
λx, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_at_cosh : differentiable_at ℝ cosh x :=
differentiable_cosh x
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh : deriv cosh = sinh :=
funext $ λ x, (has_deriv_at_cosh x).deriv
@[continuity] lemma continuous_cosh : continuous cosh :=
complex.continuous_re.comp (complex.continuous_cosh.comp complex.continuous_of_real)
/-- `sinh` is strictly monotone. -/
lemma sinh_strict_mono : strict_mono sinh :=
strict_mono_of_deriv_pos differentiable_sinh (by { rw [real.deriv_sinh], exact cosh_pos })
end real
section
/-! ### Simp lemmas for derivatives of `λ x, real.cos (f x)` etc., `f : ℝ → ℝ` -/
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' x : ℝ} {s : set ℝ}
/-! #### `real.cos` -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.cos (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.cos (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cos (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_cos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.cos (f x)) s x = - real.sin (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cos.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_cos (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.cos (f x)) x = - real.sin (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cos.deriv
/-! #### `real.sin` -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.sin (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.sin (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.sin (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_sin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.sin (f x)) s x = real.cos (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sin.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_sin (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.sin (f x)) x = real.cos (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sin.deriv
/-! #### `real.cosh` -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.cosh (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.cosh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.cosh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_cosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.cosh (f x)) s x = real.sinh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.cosh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_cosh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.cosh (f x)) x = real.sinh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.cosh.deriv
/-! #### `real.sinh` -/
lemma has_strict_deriv_at.sinh (hf : has_strict_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_deriv_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_at.sinh (hf : has_deriv_at f f' x) :
has_deriv_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) * f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp x hf
lemma has_deriv_within_at.sinh (hf : has_deriv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_deriv_within_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) * f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_deriv_within_at x hf
lemma deriv_within_sinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
deriv_within (λx, real.sinh (f x)) s x = real.cosh (f x) * (deriv_within f s x) :=
hf.has_deriv_within_at.sinh.deriv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma deriv_sinh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
deriv (λx, real.sinh (f x)) x = real.cosh (f x) * (deriv f x) :=
hc.has_deriv_at.sinh.deriv
end
section
/-! ### Simp lemmas for derivatives of `λ x, real.cos (f x)` etc., `f : E → ℝ` -/
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] {f : E → ℝ} {f' : E →L[ℝ] ℝ}
{x : E} {s : set E}
/-! #### `real.cos` -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.cos (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.cos (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.cos (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, real.cos (f x)) (- real.sin (f x) • f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cos (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.cos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.cos (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.cos.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.cos (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.cos.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.cos (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).cos
@[simp] lemma differentiable.cos (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).cos
lemma fderiv_within_cos (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
fderiv_within ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) s x = - real.sin (f x) • (fderiv_within ℝ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.cos.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_cos (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
fderiv ℝ (λx, real.cos (f x)) x = - real.sin (f x) • (fderiv ℝ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.cos.fderiv
lemma times_cont_diff.cos {n} (h : times_cont_diff ℝ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ x, real.cos (f x)) :=
real.times_cont_diff_cos.comp h
lemma times_cont_diff_at.cos {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ x, real.cos (f x)) x :=
real.times_cont_diff_cos.times_cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_on.cos {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ x, real.cos (f x)) s :=
real.times_cont_diff_cos.comp_times_cont_diff_on hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.cos {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ x, real.cos (f x)) s x :=
real.times_cont_diff_cos.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
/-! #### `real.sin` -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.sin (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.sin (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.sin (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, real.sin (f x)) (real.cos (f x) • f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sin (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.sin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.sin (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sin.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.sin (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.sin.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sin (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).sin
@[simp] lemma differentiable.sin (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).sin
lemma fderiv_within_sin (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
fderiv_within ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) s x = real.cos (f x) • (fderiv_within ℝ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sin.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_sin (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
fderiv ℝ (λx, real.sin (f x)) x = real.cos (f x) • (fderiv ℝ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.sin.fderiv
lemma times_cont_diff.sin {n} (h : times_cont_diff ℝ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ x, real.sin (f x)) :=
real.times_cont_diff_sin.comp h
lemma times_cont_diff_at.sin {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ x, real.sin (f x)) x :=
real.times_cont_diff_sin.times_cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_on.sin {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ x, real.sin (f x)) s :=
real.times_cont_diff_sin.comp_times_cont_diff_on hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.sin {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ x, real.sin (f x)) s x :=
real.times_cont_diff_sin.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
/-! #### `real.cosh` -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.cosh (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.cosh (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.cosh (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) (real.sinh (f x) • f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_cosh (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.cosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.cosh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.cosh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.cosh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.cosh (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).cosh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.cosh (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).cosh
lemma fderiv_within_cosh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
fderiv_within ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) s x = real.sinh (f x) • (fderiv_within ℝ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.cosh.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_cosh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
fderiv ℝ (λx, real.cosh (f x)) x = real.sinh (f x) • (fderiv ℝ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.cosh.fderiv
lemma times_cont_diff.cosh {n} (h : times_cont_diff ℝ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) :=
real.times_cont_diff_cosh.comp h
lemma times_cont_diff_at.cosh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) x :=
real.times_cont_diff_cosh.times_cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_on.cosh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) s :=
real.times_cont_diff_cosh.comp_times_cont_diff_on hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.cosh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ x, real.cosh (f x)) s x :=
real.times_cont_diff_cosh.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
/-! #### `real.sinh` -/
lemma has_strict_fderiv_at.sinh (hf : has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_strict_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_strict_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_at.sinh (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' x) :
has_fderiv_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) • f') x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_at x hf
lemma has_fderiv_within_at.sinh (hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s x) :
has_fderiv_within_at (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) (real.cosh (f x) • f') s x :=
(real.has_deriv_at_sinh (f x)).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x hf
lemma differentiable_within_at.sinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x) :
differentiable_within_at ℝ (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) s x :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sinh.differentiable_within_at
@[simp] lemma differentiable_at.sinh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
differentiable_at ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) x :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.sinh.differentiable_at
lemma differentiable_on.sinh (hc : differentiable_on ℝ f s) :
differentiable_on ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) s :=
λx h, (hc x h).sinh
@[simp] lemma differentiable.sinh (hc : differentiable ℝ f) :
differentiable ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) :=
λx, (hc x).sinh
lemma fderiv_within_sinh (hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s x)
(hxs : unique_diff_within_at ℝ s x) :
fderiv_within ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) s x = real.cosh (f x) • (fderiv_within ℝ f s x) :=
hf.has_fderiv_within_at.sinh.fderiv_within hxs
@[simp] lemma fderiv_sinh (hc : differentiable_at ℝ f x) :
fderiv ℝ (λx, real.sinh (f x)) x = real.cosh (f x) • (fderiv ℝ f x) :=
hc.has_fderiv_at.sinh.fderiv
lemma times_cont_diff.sinh {n} (h : times_cont_diff ℝ n f) :
times_cont_diff ℝ n (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) :=
real.times_cont_diff_sinh.comp h
lemma times_cont_diff_at.sinh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_at ℝ n f x) :
times_cont_diff_at ℝ n (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) x :=
real.times_cont_diff_sinh.times_cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma times_cont_diff_on.sinh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_on ℝ n f s) :
times_cont_diff_on ℝ n (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) s :=
real.times_cont_diff_sinh.comp_times_cont_diff_on hf
lemma times_cont_diff_within_at.sinh {n} (hf : times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n f s x) :
times_cont_diff_within_at ℝ n (λ x, real.sinh (f x)) s x :=
real.times_cont_diff_sinh.times_cont_diff_at.comp_times_cont_diff_within_at x hf
end
namespace real
lemma exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1:ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuous_on_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `data.real.pi.bounds`. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ := 2 * classical.some exists_cos_eq_zero
localized "notation `π` := real.pi" in real
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
by rw [real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
lemma one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 :=
by rw [real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
lemma pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 :=
by rw [real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _)];
exact (classical.some_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
lemma two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2, by norm_num)).1
(by rw div_self (@two_ne_zero' ℝ _ _ _); exact one_le_pi_div_two)
lemma pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2, by norm_num)).1
(calc π / 2 ≤ 2 : pi_div_two_le_two
... = 4 / 2 : by norm_num)
lemma pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
lemma pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt pi_pos
lemma pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
lemma two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π :=
by linarith [pi_pos]
end real
namespace nnreal
open real
open_locale real nnreal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 := ⟨π, real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π := rfl
lemma pi_pos : 0 < pi := by exact_mod_cast real.pi_pos
lemma pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 := pi_pos.ne'
end nnreal
namespace real
open_locale real
@[simp] lemma sin_pi : sin π = 0 :=
by rw [← mul_div_cancel_left π (@two_ne_zero ℝ _ _), two_mul, add_div,
sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp] lemma cos_pi : cos π = -1 :=
by rw [← mul_div_cancel_left π (@two_ne_zero ℝ _ _), mul_div_assoc,
cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two];
simp [bit0, pow_add]
@[simp] lemma sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 :=
by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp] lemma cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 :=
by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
lemma sin_antiperiodic : function.antiperiodic sin π :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_periodic : function.periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic
@[simp] lemma sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp] lemma sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp] lemma sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp] lemma sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp] lemma sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp] lemma sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp] lemma sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp] lemma sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp] lemma sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp] lemma sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp] lemma sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp] lemma sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp] lemma sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
lemma cos_antiperiodic : function.antiperiodic cos π :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_periodic : function.periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic
@[simp] lemma cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp] lemma cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp] lemma cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp] lemma cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp] lemma cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp] lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp] lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp] lemma cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp] lemma cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp] lemma cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp] lemma cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp] lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp] lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp] lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 :=
by simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
@[simp] lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 :=
by simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
@[simp] lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 :=
by simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
@[simp] lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 :=
by simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
lemma sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4, from rfl,
have π - x ≤ 2, from sub_le_iff_le_add.2
(le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _)),
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
lemma sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
lemma sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
begin
rw ← closure_Ioo pi_pos at hx,
exact closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (λ y, sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
end
lemma sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
lemma sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 $ sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
lemma sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 $ sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 :=
by simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2),
this.resolve_right
(λ h, (show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1, by norm_num) $
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos))
lemma sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x :=
by rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
lemma cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
lemma cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
lemma cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
lemma cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) : cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 $ cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
lemma cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 $ cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
lemma sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = sqrt (1 - cos x ^ 2) :=
by rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
lemma cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = sqrt (1 - sin x ^ 2) :=
by rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) :
sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h, le_antisymm
(le_of_not_gt (λ h0, lt_irrefl (0 : ℝ) $
calc 0 < sin x : sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂
... = 0 : h))
(le_of_not_gt (λ h0, lt_irrefl (0 : ℝ) $
calc 0 = sin x : h.symm
... < 0 : sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁)),
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨λ h, ⟨⌊x / π⌋, le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 $ le_of_not_gt $ λ h₃,
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
lemma sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x :=
by rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 :=
by rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x,
sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self];
exact ⟨λ h, by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ eq.symm⟩
lemma cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (or.inl h)) in
⟨n / 2, (int.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(λ hn0, by rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @int.cast_two ℝ, ← int.cast_mul, int.div_mul_cancel
((int.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero _ _).2 hn0)])
(λ hn1, by rw [← int.mod_add_div n 2, hn1, int.cast_add, int.cast_one, add_mul,
one_mul, add_comm, mul_comm (2 : ℤ), int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, int.cast_two] at hn;
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h;
exact absurd h (by norm_num))⟩,
λ ⟨n, hn⟩, hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
lemma cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ h,
begin
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂,
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁,
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂,
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by linarith) (by linarith),
simp
end,
λ h, by simp [h]⟩
lemma cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x :=
begin
rw [← sub_lt_zero, cos_sub_cos],
have : 0 < sin ((y + x) / 2),
{ refine sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi _ _; linarith },
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2),
{ refine sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi _ _; linarith },
nlinarith,
end
lemma cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x :=
match (le_total x (π / 2) : x ≤ π / 2 ∨ π / 2 ≤ x), le_total y (π / 2) with
| or.inl hx, or.inl hy := cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two hx₁ hy hxy
| or.inl hx, or.inr hy := (lt_or_eq_of_le hx).elim
(λ hx, calc cos y ≤ 0 : cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le hy (by linarith [pi_pos])
... < cos x : cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hx⟩)
(λ hx, calc cos y < 0 : cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos])
... = cos x : by rw [hx, cos_pi_div_two])
| or.inr hx, or.inl hy := by linarith
| or.inr hx, or.inr hy := neg_lt_neg_iff.1 (by rw [← cos_pi_sub, ← cos_pi_sub];
apply cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two; linarith)
end
lemma strict_anti_on_cos : strict_anti_on cos (Icc 0 π) :=
λ x hx y hy hxy, cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
lemma cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strict_anti_on_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
lemma sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x)
(hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y :=
by rw [← cos_sub_pi_div_two, ← cos_sub_pi_div_two, ← cos_neg (x - _), ← cos_neg (y - _)];
apply cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi; linarith
lemma strict_mono_on_sin : strict_mono_on sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
λ x hx y hy hxy, sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
lemma sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x)
(hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2) (hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strict_mono_on_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
lemma inj_on_sin : inj_on sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strict_mono_on_sin.inj_on
lemma inj_on_cos : inj_on cos (Icc 0 π) := strict_anti_on_cos.inj_on
lemma surj_on_sin : surj_on sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
by simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
using intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuous_on
lemma surj_on_cos : surj_on cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
by simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi]
using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuous_on
lemma sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 := ⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
lemma cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 := ⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
lemma maps_to_sin (s : set ℝ) : maps_to sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := λ x _, sin_mem_Icc x
lemma maps_to_cos (s : set ℝ) : maps_to cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := λ x _, cos_mem_Icc x
lemma bij_on_sin : bij_on sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨maps_to_sin _, inj_on_sin, surj_on_sin⟩
lemma bij_on_cos : bij_on cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨maps_to_cos _, inj_on_cos, surj_on_cos⟩
@[simp] lemma range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : set ℝ) :=
subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surj_on_cos.subset_range
@[simp] lemma range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : set ℝ) :=
subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surj_on_sin.subset_range
lemma range_cos_infinite : (range real.cos).infinite :=
by { rw real.range_cos, exact Icc.infinite (by norm_num) }
lemma range_sin_infinite : (range real.sin).infinite :=
by { rw real.range_sin, exact Icc.infinite (by norm_num) }
lemma sin_lt {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) : sin x < x :=
begin
cases le_or_gt x 1 with h' h',
{ have hx : |x| = x := abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h),
have : |x| ≤ 1, rwa [hx],
have := sin_bound this, rw [abs_le] at this,
have := this.2, rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', hx] at this,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt this, rw [sub_add], apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (le_of_eq (sub_zero x)),
apply sub_lt_sub_left, rw [sub_pos, div_eq_mul_inv (x ^ 3)], apply mul_lt_mul',
{ rw [pow_succ x 3], refine le_trans _ (le_of_eq (one_mul _)),
rw mul_le_mul_right, exact h', apply pow_pos h },
norm_num, norm_num, apply pow_pos h },
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (sin_le_one x) h'
end
/- note 1: this inequality is not tight, the tighter inequality is sin x > x - x ^ 3 / 6.
note 2: this is also true for x > 1, but it's nontrivial for x just above 1. -/
lemma sin_gt_sub_cube {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) (h' : x ≤ 1) : x - x ^ 3 / 4 < sin x :=
begin
have hx : |x| = x := abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h),
have : |x| ≤ 1, rwa [hx],
have := sin_bound this, rw [abs_le] at this,
have := this.1, rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, hx] at this,
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ this,
rw [add_comm, sub_add, sub_neg_eq_add], apply sub_lt_sub_left,
apply add_lt_of_lt_sub_left,
rw (show x ^ 3 / 4 - x ^ 3 / 6 = x ^ 3 * 12⁻¹,
by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_sub]; norm_num),
apply mul_lt_mul',
{ rw [pow_succ x 3], refine le_trans _ (le_of_eq (one_mul _)),
rw mul_le_mul_right, exact h', apply pow_pos h },
norm_num, norm_num, apply pow_pos h
end
section cos_div_sq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrt_two_add_series x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrt_two_add_series 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp, pp_nodot] noncomputable def sqrt_two_add_series (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 := x
| (n+1) := sqrt (2 + sqrt_two_add_series n)
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_zero : sqrt_two_add_series x 0 = x := by simp
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_one : sqrt_two_add_series 0 1 = sqrt 2 := by simp
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_two : sqrt_two_add_series 0 2 = sqrt (2 + sqrt 2) := by simp
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg : ∀(n : ℕ), 0 ≤ sqrt_two_add_series 0 n
| 0 := le_refl 0
| (n+1) := sqrt_nonneg _
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀(n : ℕ), 0 ≤ sqrt_two_add_series x n
| 0 := h
| (n+1) := sqrt_nonneg _
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_lt_two : ∀(n : ℕ), sqrt_two_add_series 0 n < 2
| 0 := by norm_num
| (n+1) :=
begin
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le,
rw [sqrt_two_add_series, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt'],
{ refine (sqrt_two_add_series_lt_two n).trans_le _, norm_num },
{ exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg n) }
end
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀(n : ℕ), sqrt_two_add_series x (n+1) = sqrt_two_add_series (sqrt (2 + x)) n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [sqrt_two_add_series, sqrt_two_add_series_succ, sqrt_two_add_series]
lemma sqrt_two_add_series_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀(n : ℕ), sqrt_two_add_series x n ≤ sqrt_two_add_series y n
| 0 := h
| (n+1) :=
begin
rw [sqrt_two_add_series, sqrt_two_add_series],
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrt_two_add_series_monotone_left _) _)
end
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀(n : ℕ), cos (π / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrt_two_add_series 0 n / 2
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) :=
begin
have : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := two_ne_zero,
symmetry, rw [div_eq_iff_mul_eq this], symmetry,
rw [sqrt_two_add_series, sqrt_eq_iff_sq_eq, mul_pow, cos_sq, ←mul_div_assoc,
nat.add_succ, pow_succ, mul_div_mul_left _ _ this, cos_pi_over_two_pow, add_mul],
congr, { norm_num },
rw [mul_comm, sq, mul_assoc, ←mul_div_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left, ←mul_div_assoc,
mul_div_cancel_left]; try { exact this },
apply add_nonneg, norm_num, apply sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg, norm_num,
apply le_of_lt, apply cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨_, _⟩,
{ transitivity (0 : ℝ), rw neg_lt_zero, apply pi_div_two_pos,
apply div_pos pi_pos, apply pow_pos, norm_num },
apply div_lt_div' (le_refl π) _ pi_pos _,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq (pow_one _).symm) _,
apply pow_lt_pow, norm_num, apply nat.succ_lt_succ, apply nat.succ_pos, all_goals {norm_num}
end
lemma sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n+1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrt_two_add_series 0 n / 2) ^ 2 :=
by rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
lemma sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n+2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrt_two_add_series 0 n / 4 :=
begin
rw [sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow, sqrt_two_add_series, div_pow, sq_sqrt, add_div, ←sub_sub],
congr, norm_num, norm_num, apply add_nonneg, norm_num, apply sqrt_two_add_series_zero_nonneg,
end
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n+2)) = sqrt (2 - sqrt_two_add_series 0 n) / 2 :=
begin
symmetry, rw [div_eq_iff_mul_eq], symmetry,
rw [sqrt_eq_iff_sq_eq, mul_pow, sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul],
{ congr, norm_num, rw [mul_comm], convert mul_div_cancel' _ _, norm_num, norm_num },
{ rw [sub_nonneg], apply le_of_lt, apply sqrt_two_add_series_lt_two },
apply le_of_lt, apply mul_pos, apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi,
{ apply div_pos pi_pos, apply pow_pos, norm_num },
refine lt_of_lt_of_le _ (le_of_eq (div_one _)), rw [div_lt_div_left],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq (pow_zero 2).symm) _,
apply pow_lt_pow, norm_num, apply nat.succ_pos, apply pi_pos,
apply pow_pos, all_goals {norm_num}
end
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_four : cos (π / 4) = sqrt 2 / 2 :=
by { transitivity cos (π / 2 ^ 2), congr, norm_num, simp }
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_four : sin (π / 4) = sqrt 2 / 2 :=
by { transitivity sin (π / 2 ^ 2), congr, norm_num, simp }
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_eight : cos (π / 8) = sqrt (2 + sqrt 2) / 2 :=
by { transitivity cos (π / 2 ^ 3), congr, norm_num, simp }
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_eight : sin (π / 8) = sqrt (2 - sqrt 2) / 2 :=
by { transitivity sin (π / 2 ^ 3), congr, norm_num, simp }
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (π / 16) = sqrt (2 + sqrt (2 + sqrt 2)) / 2 :=
by { transitivity cos (π / 2 ^ 4), congr, norm_num, simp }
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (π / 16) = sqrt (2 - sqrt (2 + sqrt 2)) / 2 :=
by { transitivity sin (π / 2 ^ 4), congr, norm_num, simp }
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (π / 32) = sqrt (2 + sqrt (2 + sqrt (2 + sqrt 2))) / 2 :=
by { transitivity cos (π / 2 ^ 5), congr, norm_num, simp }
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (π / 32) = sqrt (2 - sqrt (2 + sqrt (2 + sqrt 2))) / 2 :=
by { transitivity sin (π / 2 ^ 5), congr, norm_num, simp }
-- This section is also a convenient location for other explicit values of `sin` and `cos`.
/-- The cosine of `π / 3` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_three : cos (π / 3) = 1 / 2 :=
begin
have h₁ : (2 * cos (π / 3) - 1) ^ 2 * (2 * cos (π / 3) + 2) = 0,
{ have : cos (3 * (π / 3)) = cos π := by { congr' 1, ring },
linarith [cos_pi, cos_three_mul (π / 3)] },
cases mul_eq_zero.mp h₁ with h h,
{ linarith [pow_eq_zero h] },
{ have : cos π < cos (π / 3),
{ refine cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi _ rfl.ge _;
linarith [pi_pos] },
linarith [cos_pi] }
end
/-- The square of the cosine of `π / 6` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
lemma sq_cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 :=
begin
have h1 : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 + 1 / 2 / 2,
{ convert cos_sq (π / 6),
have h2 : 2 * (π / 6) = π / 3 := by cancel_denoms,
rw [h2, cos_pi_div_three] },
rw ← sub_eq_zero at h1 ⊢,
convert h1 using 1,
ring
end
/-- The cosine of `π / 6` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) = (sqrt 3) / 2 :=
begin
suffices : sqrt 3 = cos (π / 6) * 2,
{ field_simp [(by norm_num : 0 ≠ 2)], exact this.symm },
rw sqrt_eq_iff_sq_eq,
{ have h1 := (mul_right_inj' (by norm_num : (4:ℝ) ≠ 0)).mpr sq_cos_pi_div_six,
rw ← sub_eq_zero at h1 ⊢,
convert h1 using 1,
ring },
{ norm_num },
{ have : 0 < cos (π / 6) := by { apply cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo; split; linarith [pi_pos] },
linarith },
end
/-- The sine of `π / 6` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_six : sin (π / 6) = 1 / 2 :=
begin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_three],
congr,
ring
end
/-- The square of the sine of `π / 3` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
lemma sq_sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 :=
begin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← sq_cos_pi_div_six],
congr,
ring
end
/-- The sine of `π / 3` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) = (sqrt 3) / 2 :=
begin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_six],
congr,
ring
end
end cos_div_sq
/-- The type of angles -/
def angle : Type :=
quotient_add_group.quotient (add_subgroup.gmultiples (2 * π))
namespace angle
instance angle.add_comm_group : add_comm_group angle :=
quotient_add_group.add_comm_group _
instance : inhabited angle := ⟨0⟩
instance angle.has_coe : has_coe ℝ angle :=
⟨quotient.mk'⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : angle) := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : angle) :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, coe_add, coe_neg]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : angle) :=
by simpa using add_monoid_hom.map_nsmul ⟨coe, coe_zero, coe_add⟩ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_int_mul_eq_gsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : angle) :=
by simpa using add_monoid_hom.map_gsmul ⟨coe, coe_zero, coe_add⟩ _ _
@[simp] lemma coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : angle) :=
quotient.sound' ⟨-1, show (-1 : ℤ) • (2 * π) = _, by rw [neg_one_gsmul, add_zero]⟩
lemma angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k :=
by simp only [quotient_add_group.eq, add_subgroup.gmultiples_eq_closure,
add_subgroup.mem_closure_singleton, gsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : angle) = -ψ :=
begin
split,
{ intro Hcos,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false_intro two_ne_zero, false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos,
rcases Hcos with ⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩,
{ right,
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (@two_ne_zero ℝ _ _), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn,
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc,
coe_int_mul_eq_gsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, gsmul_zero] },
{ left,
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (@two_ne_zero ℝ _ _), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn,
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc,
coe_int_mul_eq_gsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, gsmul_zero, zero_add] },
apply_instance, },
{ rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub],
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩),
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _ _), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero],
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _ _), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul] }
end
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : angle) + ψ = π :=
begin
split,
{ intro Hsin, rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin,
cases cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h,
{ left, rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h, exact sub_right_inj.1 h },
right, rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub,
sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add, add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h,
exact h.symm },
{ rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ←eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ←coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub],
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩),
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _ _), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul],
have H' : θ + ψ = (2 * k) * π + π := by rwa [←sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add,
mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←mul_assoc] at H,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero ℝ _ _), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero] }
end
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : angle) = ψ :=
begin
cases cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc, { exact hc },
cases sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs, { exact hs },
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc,
cases quotient.exact' hc with n hn, change n • _ = _ at hn,
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, gsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul,
mul_eq_zero, eq_false_intro (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add,
← int.cast_zero, ← int.cast_one, ← int.cast_bit0, ← int.cast_mul, ← int.cast_add,
int.cast_inj] at hn,
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2:ℤ) = 0 % (2:ℤ) := congr_arg (%(2:ℤ)) hn,
rw [add_comm, int.add_mul_mod_self] at this,
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
end
end angle
/-- `real.sin` as an `order_iso` between `[-(π / 2), π / 2]` and `[-1, 1]`. -/
def sin_order_iso : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o Icc (-1:ℝ) 1 :=
(strict_mono_on_sin.order_iso _ _).trans $ order_iso.set_congr _ _ bij_on_sin.image_eq
@[simp] lemma coe_sin_order_iso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
(sin_order_iso x : ℝ) = sin x := rfl
lemma sin_order_iso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
sin_order_iso x = ⟨sin x, sin_mem_Icc x⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma tan_pi_div_four : tan (π / 4) = 1 :=
begin
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_pi_div_four, sin_pi_div_four],
have h : (sqrt 2) / 2 > 0 := by cancel_denoms,
exact div_self (ne_of_gt h),
end
@[simp] lemma tan_pi_div_two : tan (π / 2) = 0 := by simp [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
lemma tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x :=
by rw tan_eq_sin_div_cos; exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith))
(cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hxp⟩)
lemma tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| or.inl hx0, or.inl hxp := le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| or.inl hx0, or.inr hxp := by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| or.inr hx0, _ := by simp [hx0.symm]
end
lemma tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
lemma tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) :
tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith))
lemma tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ}
(hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : x < y) :
tan x < tan y :=
begin
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos],
exact div_lt_div
(sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (le_of_lt hy₂) hxy)
(cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (by linarith) (le_of_lt hxy))
(sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (by linarith) (by linarith))
(cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hy₂⟩)
end
lemma tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x)
(hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
match le_total x 0, le_total y 0 with
| or.inl hx0, or.inl hy0 := neg_lt_neg_iff.1 $ by rw [← tan_neg, ← tan_neg]; exact
tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two (neg_nonneg.2 hy0)
(neg_lt.2 hx₁) (neg_lt_neg hxy)
| or.inl hx0, or.inr hy0 := (lt_or_eq_of_le hy0).elim
(λ hy0, calc tan x ≤ 0 : tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le hx0 (le_of_lt hx₁)
... < tan y : tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hy0 hy₂)
(λ hy0, by rw [← hy0, tan_zero]; exact
tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt (hy0.symm ▸ hxy) hx₁)
| or.inr hx0, or.inl hy0 := by linarith
| or.inr hx0, or.inr hy0 := tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hy₂ hxy
end
lemma strict_mono_on_tan : strict_mono_on tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
λ x hx y hy, tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2
lemma inj_on_tan : inj_on tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strict_mono_on_tan.inj_on
lemma tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
inj_on_tan ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ hxy
lemma tan_periodic : function.periodic tan π :=
by simpa only [function.periodic, tan_eq_sin_div_cos] using sin_antiperiodic.div cos_antiperiodic
lemma tan_add_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x + π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic x
lemma tan_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x - π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq x
lemma tan_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.sub_eq'
lemma tan_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_eq n
lemma tan_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_eq n
lemma tan_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.nat_mul n x
lemma tan_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.int_mul n x
lemma tan_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
lemma tan_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
lemma tan_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
lemma tan_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
lemma tendsto_sin_pi_div_two : tendsto sin (𝓝[Iio (π/2)] (π/2)) (𝓝 1) :=
by { convert continuous_sin.continuous_within_at, simp }
lemma tendsto_cos_pi_div_two : tendsto cos (𝓝[Iio (π/2)] (π/2)) (𝓝[Ioi 0] 0) :=
begin
apply tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within,
{ convert continuous_cos.continuous_within_at, simp },
{ filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio (right_mem_Ioc.mpr (norm_num.lt_neg_pos
_ _ pi_div_two_pos pi_div_two_pos))] λ x hx, cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx },
end
lemma tendsto_tan_pi_div_two : tendsto tan (𝓝[Iio (π/2)] (π/2)) at_top :=
begin
convert tendsto_cos_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_zero.at_top_mul zero_lt_one
tendsto_sin_pi_div_two,
simp only [pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
end
lemma tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two : tendsto sin (𝓝[Ioi (-(π/2))] (-(π/2))) (𝓝 (-1)) :=
by { convert continuous_sin.continuous_within_at, simp }
lemma tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two : tendsto cos (𝓝[Ioi (-(π/2))] (-(π/2))) (𝓝[Ioi 0] 0) :=
begin
apply tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within,
{ convert continuous_cos.continuous_within_at, simp },
{ filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi (left_mem_Ico.mpr (norm_num.lt_neg_pos
_ _ pi_div_two_pos pi_div_two_pos))] λ x hx, cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx },
end
lemma tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two : tendsto tan (𝓝[Ioi (-(π/2))] (-(π/2))) at_bot :=
begin
convert tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_zero.at_top_mul_neg (by norm_num)
tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two,
simp only [pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
end
end real
namespace complex
open_locale real
lemma sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {z : ℂ} : sin z = 0 ↔ cos z = 1 ∨ cos z = -1 :=
by rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self];
exact ⟨λ h, by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ eq.symm⟩
@[simp] lemma cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
calc cos (π / 2) = real.cos (π / 2) : by rw [of_real_cos]; simp
... = 0 : by simp
@[simp] lemma sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
calc sin (π / 2) = real.sin (π / 2) : by rw [of_real_sin]; simp
... = 1 : by simp
@[simp] lemma sin_pi : sin π = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_sin, real.sin_pi]; simp
@[simp] lemma cos_pi : cos π = -1 :=
by rw [← of_real_cos, real.cos_pi]; simp
@[simp] lemma sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 :=
by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp] lemma cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 :=
by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
lemma sin_antiperiodic : function.antiperiodic sin π :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_periodic : function.periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic
lemma sin_add_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
lemma sin_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
lemma sin_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
lemma sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
lemma sin_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
lemma sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
lemma sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
lemma sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
lemma sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
lemma sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
lemma sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
lemma sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
lemma sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
lemma sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
lemma cos_antiperiodic : function.antiperiodic cos π :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_periodic : function.periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic
lemma cos_add_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
lemma cos_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
lemma cos_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
lemma cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
lemma cos_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
lemma cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
lemma cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
lemma cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
lemma cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
lemma cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 :=
by simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 :=
by simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
lemma cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 :=
by simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
lemma cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 :=
by simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
lemma sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℂ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x :=
by simp [sin_add]
lemma sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℂ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
lemma cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℂ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x :=
by simp [cos_add]
lemma cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℂ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
lemma cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x :=
by rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
lemma tan_periodic : function.periodic tan π :=
by simpa only [tan_eq_sin_div_cos] using sin_antiperiodic.div cos_antiperiodic
lemma tan_add_pi (x : ℂ) : tan (x + π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic x
lemma tan_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : tan (x - π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq x
lemma tan_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : tan (π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.sub_eq'
lemma tan_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_eq n
lemma tan_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_eq n
lemma tan_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.nat_mul n x
lemma tan_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.int_mul n x
lemma tan_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
lemma tan_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
lemma tan_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
lemma tan_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
lemma exp_antiperiodic : function.antiperiodic exp (π * I) :=
by simp [exp_add, exp_mul_I]
lemma exp_periodic : function.periodic exp (2 * π * I) :=
(mul_assoc (2:ℂ) π I).symm ▸ exp_antiperiodic.periodic
lemma exp_mul_I_antiperiodic : function.antiperiodic (λ x, exp (x * I)) π :=
by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right₀ I_ne_zero] using exp_antiperiodic.mul_const I_ne_zero
lemma exp_mul_I_periodic : function.periodic (λ x, exp (x * I)) (2 * π) :=
exp_mul_I_antiperiodic.periodic
lemma exp_pi_mul_I : exp (π * I) = -1 :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_antiperiodic.eq
lemma exp_two_pi_mul_I : exp (2 * π * I) = 1 :=
exp_periodic.eq.trans exp_zero
lemma exp_nat_mul_two_pi_mul_I (n : ℕ) : exp (n * (2 * π * I)) = 1 :=
(exp_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans exp_zero
lemma exp_int_mul_two_pi_mul_I (n : ℤ) : exp (n * (2 * π * I)) = 1 :=
(exp_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans exp_zero
end complex
|
02b5e4f7a2e9d7ededd103959d7299e30c9cfcc5 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/analysis/box_integral/box/basic.lean | 389e578cd9708f36530190cfa37f89ae0d0da6b5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,633 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.instances.real
/-!
# Rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. As usual, we represent `ℝⁿ` as the type of
functions `ι → ℝ` (usually `ι = fin n` for some `n`). When we need to interpret a box `[l, u]` as a
set, we use the product `{x | ∀ i, l i < x i ∧ x i ≤ u i}` of half-open intervals `(l i, u i]`. We
exclude `l i` because this way boxes of a partition are disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Currently, the only use cases for these constructions are the definitions of Riemann-style integrals
(Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, McShane).
## Main definitions
We use the same structure `box_integral.box` both for ambient boxes and for elements of a partition.
Each box is stored as two points `lower upper : ι → ℝ` and a proof of `∀ i, lower i < upper i`. We
define instances `has_mem (ι → ℝ) (box ι)` and `has_coe_t (box ι) (set $ ι → ℝ)` so that each box is
interpreted as the set `{x | ∀ i, x i ∈ set.Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)}`. This way boxes of a
partition are pairwise disjoint and their union is exactly the original box.
We require boxes to be nonempty, because this way coercion to sets is injective. The empty box can
be represented as `⊥ : with_bot (box_integral.box ι)`.
We define the following operations on boxes:
* coercion to `set (ι → ℝ)` and `has_mem (ι → ℝ) (box_integral.box ι)` as described above;
* `partial_order` and `semilattice_sup` instances such that `I ≤ J` is equivalent to
`(I : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J`;
* `lattice` and `semilattice_inf_bot` instances on `with_bot (box_integral.box ι)`;
* `box_integral.box.Icc`: the closed box `set.Icc I.lower I.upper`; defined as a bundled monotone
map from `box ι` to `set (ι → ℝ)`;
* `box_integral.box.face I i : box (fin n)`: a hyperface of `I : box_integral.box (fin (n + 1))`;
* `box_integral.box.distortion`: the maximal ratio of two lengths of edges of a box; defined as the
supremum of `nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)`.
We also provide a convenience constructor `box_integral.box.mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : with_bot (box ι)`
that returns the box `⟨l, u, _⟩` if it is nonempty and `⊥` otherwise.
## Tags
rectangular box
-/
open set function metric
noncomputable theory
open_locale nnreal classical
namespace box_integral
variables {ι : Type*}
/-!
### Rectangular box: definition and partial order
-/
/-- A nontrivial rectangular box in `ι → ℝ` with corners `lower` and `upper`. Repesents the product
of half-open intervals `(lower i, upper i]`. -/
structure box (ι : Type*) :=
(lower upper : ι → ℝ)
(lower_lt_upper : ∀ i, lower i < upper i)
attribute [simp] box.lower_lt_upper
namespace box
variables (I J : box ι) {x y : ι → ℝ}
instance : inhabited (box ι) := ⟨⟨0, 1, λ i, zero_lt_one⟩⟩
lemma lower_le_upper : I.lower ≤ I.upper := λ i, (I.lower_lt_upper i).le
instance : has_mem (ι → ℝ) (box ι) := ⟨λ x I, ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)⟩
instance : has_coe_t (box ι) (set $ ι → ℝ) := ⟨λ I, {x | x ∈ I}⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {l u x : ι → ℝ} {H} : x ∈ mk l u H ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (l i) (u i) := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma mem_coe : x ∈ (I : set (ι → ℝ)) ↔ x ∈ I := iff.rfl
lemma mem_def : x ∈ I ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i) := iff.rfl
lemma mem_univ_Ioc {I : box ι} : x ∈ pi univ (λ i, Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_univ_pi
lemma coe_eq_pi : (I : set (ι → ℝ)) = pi univ (λ i, Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_univ_Ioc.symm
@[simp] lemma upper_mem : I.upper ∈ I := λ i, right_mem_Ioc.2 $ I.lower_lt_upper i
lemma exists_mem : ∃ x, x ∈ I := ⟨_, I.upper_mem⟩
lemma nonempty_coe : set.nonempty (I : set (ι → ℝ)) := I.exists_mem
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_empty : (I : set (ι → ℝ)) ≠ ∅ := I.nonempty_coe.ne_empty
@[simp] lemma empty_ne_coe : ∅ ≠ (I : set (ι → ℝ)) := I.coe_ne_empty.symm
instance : has_le (box ι) := ⟨λ I J, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ I → x ∈ J⟩
lemma le_def : I ≤ J ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, x ∈ J := iff.rfl
lemma le_tfae :
tfae [I ≤ J,
(I : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J,
Icc I.lower I.upper ⊆ Icc J.lower J.upper,
J.lower ≤ I.lower ∧ I.upper ≤ J.upper] :=
begin
tfae_have : 1 ↔ 2, from iff.rfl,
tfae_have : 2 → 3, from λ h, by simpa [coe_eq_pi, closure_pi_set] using closure_mono h,
tfae_have : 3 ↔ 4, from Icc_subset_Icc_iff I.lower_le_upper,
tfae_have : 4 → 2, from λ h x hx i, Ioc_subset_Ioc (h.1 i) (h.2 i) (hx i),
tfae_finish
end
variables {I J}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_subset_coe : (I : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J ↔ I ≤ J := iff.rfl
lemma le_iff_bounds : I ≤ J ↔ J.lower ≤ I.lower ∧ I.upper ≤ J.upper := (le_tfae I J).out 0 3
lemma injective_coe : injective (coe : box ι → set (ι → ℝ)) :=
begin
rintros ⟨l₁, u₁, h₁⟩ ⟨l₂, u₂, h₂⟩ h,
simp only [subset.antisymm_iff, coe_subset_coe, le_iff_bounds] at h,
congr,
exacts [le_antisymm h.2.1 h.1.1, le_antisymm h.1.2 h.2.2]
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inj : (I : set (ι → ℝ)) = J ↔ I = J :=
injective_coe.eq_iff
@[ext] lemma ext (H : ∀ x, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) : I = J :=
injective_coe $ set.ext H
lemma ne_of_disjoint_coe (h : disjoint (I : set (ι → ℝ)) J) : I ≠ J :=
mt coe_inj.2 $ h.ne I.coe_ne_empty
instance : partial_order (box ι) :=
{ le := (≤),
.. partial_order.lift (coe : box ι → set (ι → ℝ)) injective_coe }
/-- Closed box corresponding to `I : box_integral.box ι`. -/
protected def Icc : box ι ↪o set (ι → ℝ) :=
order_embedding.of_map_le_iff (λ I : box ι, Icc I.lower I.upper) (λ I J, (le_tfae I J).out 2 0)
lemma Icc_def : I.Icc = Icc I.lower I.upper := rfl
@[simp] lemma upper_mem_Icc (I : box ι) : I.upper ∈ I.Icc := right_mem_Icc.2 I.lower_le_upper
@[simp] lemma lower_mem_Icc (I : box ι) : I.lower ∈ I.Icc := left_mem_Icc.2 I.lower_le_upper
protected lemma is_compact_Icc (I : box ι) : is_compact I.Icc := is_compact_Icc
lemma Icc_eq_pi : I.Icc = pi univ (λ i, Icc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) := (pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm
lemma le_iff_Icc : I ≤ J ↔ I.Icc ⊆ J.Icc := (le_tfae I J).out 0 2
lemma antitone_lower : antitone (λ I : box ι, I.lower) :=
λ I J H, (le_iff_bounds.1 H).1
lemma monotone_upper : monotone (λ I : box ι, I.upper) :=
λ I J H, (le_iff_bounds.1 H).2
lemma coe_subset_Icc : ↑I ⊆ I.Icc := λ x hx, ⟨λ i, (hx i).1.le, λ i, (hx i).2⟩
/-!
### Supremum of two boxes
-/
/-- `I ⊔ J` is the least box that includes both `I` and `J`. Since `↑I ∪ ↑J` is usually not a box,
`↑(I ⊔ J)` is larger than `↑I ∪ ↑J`. -/
instance : has_sup (box ι) :=
⟨λ I J, ⟨I.lower ⊓ J.lower, I.upper ⊔ J.upper,
λ i, (min_le_left _ _).trans_lt $ (I.lower_lt_upper i).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)⟩⟩
instance : semilattice_sup (box ι) :=
{ le_sup_left := λ I J, le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨inf_le_left, le_sup_left⟩,
le_sup_right := λ I J, le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨inf_le_right, le_sup_right⟩,
sup_le := λ I₁ I₂ J h₁ h₂, le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨le_inf (antitone_lower h₁) (antitone_lower h₂),
sup_le (monotone_upper h₁) (monotone_upper h₂)⟩,
.. box.partial_order, .. box.has_sup }
/-!
### `with_bot (box ι)`
In this section we define coercion from `with_bot (box ι)` to `set (ι → ℝ)` by sending `⊥` to `∅`.
-/
instance with_bot_coe : has_coe_t (with_bot (box ι)) (set (ι → ℝ)) := ⟨λ o, o.elim ∅ coe⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bot : ((⊥ : with_bot (box ι)) : set (ι → ℝ)) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_coe : ((I : with_bot (box ι)) : set (ι → ℝ)) = I := rfl
lemma is_some_iff : ∀ {I : with_bot (box ι)}, I.is_some ↔ (I : set (ι → ℝ)).nonempty
| ⊥ := by { erw option.is_some, simp }
| (I : box ι) := by { erw option.is_some, simp [I.nonempty_coe] }
lemma bUnion_coe_eq_coe (I : with_bot (box ι)) :
(⋃ (J : box ι) (hJ : ↑J = I), (J : set (ι → ℝ))) = I :=
by induction I using with_bot.rec_bot_coe; simp [with_bot.coe_eq_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma with_bot_coe_subset_iff {I J : with_bot (box ι)} :
(I : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
begin
induction I using with_bot.rec_bot_coe, { simp },
induction J using with_bot.rec_bot_coe, { simp [subset_empty_iff] },
simp
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma with_bot_coe_inj {I J : with_bot (box ι)} :
(I : set (ι → ℝ)) = J ↔ I = J :=
by simp only [subset.antisymm_iff, ← le_antisymm_iff, with_bot_coe_subset_iff]
/-- Make a `with_bot (box ι)` from a pair of corners `l u : ι → ℝ`. If `l i < u i` for all `i`,
then the result is `⟨l, u, _⟩ : box ι`, otherwise it is `⊥`. In any case, the result interpreted
as a set in `ι → ℝ` is the set `{x : ι → ℝ | ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (l i) (u i)}`. -/
def mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : with_bot (box ι) :=
if h : ∀ i, l i < u i then ↑(⟨l, u, h⟩ : box ι) else ⊥
@[simp] lemma mk'_eq_bot {l u : ι → ℝ} : mk' l u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, u i ≤ l i :=
by { rw mk', split_ifs; simpa using h }
@[simp] lemma mk'_eq_coe {l u : ι → ℝ} : mk' l u = I ↔ l = I.lower ∧ u = I.upper :=
begin
cases I with lI uI hI, rw mk', split_ifs,
{ simp [with_bot.coe_eq_coe] },
{ suffices : l = lI → u ≠ uI, by simpa,
rintro rfl rfl, exact h hI }
end
@[simp] lemma coe_mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : (mk' l u : set (ι → ℝ)) = pi univ (λ i, Ioc (l i) (u i)) :=
begin
rw mk', split_ifs,
{ exact coe_eq_pi _ },
{ rcases not_forall.mp h with ⟨i, hi⟩,
rw [coe_bot, univ_pi_eq_empty], exact Ioc_eq_empty hi }
end
instance : has_inf (with_bot (box ι)) :=
⟨λ I, with_bot.rec_bot_coe (λ J, ⊥) (λ I J, with_bot.rec_bot_coe ⊥
(λ J, mk' (I.lower ⊔ J.lower) (I.upper ⊓ J.upper)) J) I⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_inf (I J : with_bot (box ι)) : (↑(I ⊓ J) : set (ι → ℝ)) = I ∩ J :=
begin
induction I using with_bot.rec_bot_coe, { change ∅ = _, simp },
induction J using with_bot.rec_bot_coe, { change ∅ = _, simp },
change ↑(mk' _ _) = _,
simp only [coe_eq_pi, ← pi_inter_distrib, Ioc_inter_Ioc, pi.sup_apply, pi.inf_apply, coe_mk',
coe_coe]
end
instance : lattice (with_bot (box ι)) :=
{ inf_le_left := λ I J,
begin
rw [← with_bot_coe_subset_iff, coe_inf],
exact inter_subset_left _ _
end,
inf_le_right := λ I J,
begin
rw [← with_bot_coe_subset_iff, coe_inf],
exact inter_subset_right _ _
end,
le_inf := λ I J₁ J₂ h₁ h₂,
begin
simp only [← with_bot_coe_subset_iff, coe_inf] at *,
exact subset_inter h₁ h₂
end,
.. with_bot.semilattice_sup, .. box.with_bot.has_inf }
instance : semilattice_inf_bot (with_bot (box ι)) :=
{ .. box.with_bot.lattice, .. with_bot.semilattice_sup }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma disjoint_with_bot_coe {I J : with_bot (box ι)} :
disjoint (I : set (ι → ℝ)) J ↔ disjoint I J :=
by { simp only [disjoint, ← with_bot_coe_subset_iff, coe_inf], refl }
lemma disjoint_coe : disjoint (I : with_bot (box ι)) J ↔ disjoint (I : set (ι → ℝ)) J :=
disjoint_with_bot_coe.symm
lemma not_disjoint_coe_iff_nonempty_inter :
¬disjoint (I : with_bot (box ι)) J ↔ (I ∩ J : set (ι → ℝ)).nonempty :=
by rw [disjoint_coe, set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
/-!
### Hyperface of a box in `ℝⁿ⁺¹ = fin (n + 1) → ℝ`
-/
/-- Face of a box in `ℝⁿ⁺¹ = fin (n + 1) → ℝ`: the box in `ℝⁿ = fin n → ℝ` with corners at
`I.lower ∘ fin.succ_above i` and `I.upper ∘ fin.succ_above i`. -/
@[simps] def face {n} (I : box (fin (n + 1))) (i : fin (n + 1)) : box (fin n) :=
⟨I.lower ∘ fin.succ_above i, I.upper ∘ fin.succ_above i, λ j, I.lower_lt_upper _⟩
@[simp] lemma face_mk {n} (l u : fin (n + 1) → ℝ) (h : ∀ i, l i < u i) (i : fin (n + 1)) :
face ⟨l, u, h⟩ i = ⟨l ∘ fin.succ_above i, u ∘ fin.succ_above i, λ j, h _⟩ :=
rfl
@[mono] lemma face_mono {n} {I J : box (fin (n + 1))} (h : I ≤ J) (i : fin (n + 1)) :
face I i ≤ face J i :=
λ x hx i, Ioc_subset_Ioc ((le_iff_bounds.1 h).1 _) ((le_iff_bounds.1 h).2 _) (hx _)
lemma maps_to_insert_nth_face_Icc {n} (I : box (fin (n + 1))) {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : ℝ}
(hx : x ∈ Icc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) :
maps_to (i.insert_nth x) (I.face i).Icc I.Icc :=
λ y hy, fin.insert_nth_mem_Icc.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
lemma maps_to_insert_nth_face {n} (I : box (fin (n + 1))) {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : ℝ}
(hx : x ∈ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) :
maps_to (i.insert_nth x) (I.face i) I :=
λ y hy, by simpa only [mem_coe, mem_def, i.forall_iff_succ_above, hx, fin.insert_nth_apply_same,
fin.insert_nth_apply_succ_above, true_and]
lemma continuous_on_face_Icc {X} [topological_space X] {n} {f : (fin (n + 1) → ℝ) → X}
{I : box (fin (n + 1))} (h : continuous_on f I.Icc) {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : ℝ}
(hx : x ∈ Icc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) :
continuous_on (f ∘ i.insert_nth x) (I.face i).Icc :=
h.comp (continuous_on_const.fin_insert_nth i continuous_on_id) (I.maps_to_insert_nth_face_Icc hx)
section distortion
variable [fintype ι]
/-- The distortion of a box `I` is the maximum of the ratios of the lengths of its edges.
It is defined as the maximum of the ratios
`nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)`. -/
def distortion (I : box ι) : ℝ≥0 :=
finset.univ.sup $ λ i : ι, nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)
lemma distortion_eq_of_sub_eq_div {I J : box ι} {r : ℝ}
(h : ∀ i, I.upper i - I.lower i = (J.upper i - J.lower i) / r) :
distortion I = distortion J :=
begin
simp only [distortion, nndist_pi_def, real.nndist_eq', h, real.nnabs.map_div],
congr' 1 with i,
have : 0 < r,
{ by_contra hr,
have := div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (sub_nonneg.2 $ J.lower_le_upper i) (not_lt.1 hr),
rw ← h at this,
exact this.not_lt (sub_pos.2 $ I.lower_lt_upper i) },
simp only [nnreal.finset_sup_div, div_div_div_cancel_right _ (real.nnabs.map_ne_zero.2 this.ne')]
end
lemma nndist_le_distortion_mul (I : box ι) (i : ι) :
nndist I.lower I.upper ≤ I.distortion * nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i) :=
calc nndist I.lower I.upper =
(nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) * nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i) :
(div_mul_cancel _ $ mt nndist_eq_zero.1 (I.lower_lt_upper i).ne).symm
... ≤ I.distortion * nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i) :
mul_le_mul_right' (finset.le_sup $ finset.mem_univ i) _
lemma dist_le_distortion_mul (I : box ι) (i : ι) :
dist I.lower I.upper ≤ I.distortion * (I.upper i - I.lower i) :=
have A : I.lower i - I.upper i < 0, from sub_neg.2 (I.lower_lt_upper i),
by simpa only [← nnreal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist, nnreal.coe_mul, real.dist_eq,
abs_of_neg A, neg_sub] using I.nndist_le_distortion_mul i
lemma diam_Icc_le_of_distortion_le (I : box ι) (i : ι) {c : ℝ≥0} (h : I.distortion ≤ c) :
diam I.Icc ≤ c * (I.upper i - I.lower i) :=
have (0 : ℝ) ≤ c * (I.upper i - I.lower i),
from mul_nonneg c.coe_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 $ I.lower_le_upper _),
diam_le_of_forall_dist_le this $ λ x hx y hy,
calc dist x y ≤ dist I.lower I.upper : real.dist_le_of_mem_pi_Icc hx hy
... ≤ I.distortion * (I.upper i - I.lower i) : I.dist_le_distortion_mul i
... ≤ c * (I.upper i - I.lower i) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (sub_nonneg.2 (I.lower_le_upper i))
end distortion
end box
end box_integral
|
735b2a80ca5087a89bd5f9afb56875bf30130740 | 947fa6c38e48771ae886239b4edce6db6e18d0fb | /src/measure_theory/measure/hausdorff.lean | c0cf8d401d8c6614957c5a19f324a08e17aa7ecc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ramonfmir/mathlib | c5dc8b33155473fab97c38bd3aa6723dc289beaa | 14c52e990c17f5a00c0cc9e09847af16fabbed25 | refs/heads/master | 1,661,979,343,526 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 182,072,989 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,585,876,000 | 1,555,585,876,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 44,818 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.special_functions.pow
import logic.equiv.list
import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space
import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue
import topology.metric_space.holder
import topology.metric_space.metric_separated
/-!
# Hausdorff measure and metric (outer) measures
In this file we define the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure on an (extended) metric space `X` and
the Hausdorff dimension of a set in an (extended) metric space. Let `μ d δ` be the maximal outer
measure such that `μ d δ s ≤ (emetric.diam s) ^ d` for every set of diameter less than `δ`. Then
the Hausdorff measure `μH[d] s` of `s` is defined as `⨆ δ > 0, μ d δ s`. By Caratheodory theorem
`measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.borel_le_caratheodory`, this is a Borel measure on `X`.
The value of `μH[d]`, `d > 0`, on a set `s` (measurable or not) is given by
```
μH[d] s = ⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : 0 < r), ⨅ (t : ℕ → set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n)
(ht : ∀ n, emetric.diam (t n) ≤ r), ∑' n, emetric.diam (t n) ^ d
```
For every set `s` for any `d < d'` we have either `μH[d] s = ∞` or `μH[d'] s = 0`, see
`measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_zero_or_top`. In
`topology.metric_space.hausdorff_dimension` we use this fact to define the Hausdorff dimension
`dimH` of a set in an (extended) metric space.
We also define two generalizations of the Hausdorff measure. In one generalization (see
`measure_theory.measure.mk_metric`) we take any function `m (diam s)` instead of `(diam s) ^ d`. In
an even more general definition (see `measure_theory.measure.mk_metric'`) we use any function
of `m : set X → ℝ≥0∞`. Some authors start with a partial function `m` defined only on some sets
`s : set X` (e.g., only on balls or only on measurable sets). This is equivalent to our definition
applied to `measure_theory.extend m`.
We also define a predicate `measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric` which says that an outer measure
is additive on metric separated pairs of sets: `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` provided that
`⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), edist x y ≠ 0`. This is the property required for the Caratheodory theorem
`measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.borel_le_caratheodory`, so we prove this theorem for any
metric outer measure, then prove that outer measures constructed using `mk_metric'` are metric outer
measures.
## Main definitions
* `measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric`: an outer measure `μ` is called *metric* if
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` for any two metric separated sets `s` and `t`. A metric outer measure in a
Borel extended metric space is guaranteed to satisfy the Caratheodory condition, see
`measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.borel_le_caratheodory`.
* `measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'` and its particular case
`measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric`: a construction of an outer measure that is guaranteed to
be metric. Both constructions are generalizations of the Hausdorff measure. The same measures
interpreted as Borel measures are called `measure_theory.measure.mk_metric'` and
`measure_theory.measure.mk_metric`.
* `measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure` a.k.a. `μH[d]`: the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure.
There are many definitions of the Hausdorff measure that differ from each other by a
multiplicative constant. We put
`μH[d] s = ⨆ r > 0, ⨅ (t : ℕ → set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) (ht : ∀ n, emetric.diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ (ht : ¬set.subsingleton (t n)), (emetric.diam (t n)) ^ d`,
see `measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_apply'`. In the most interesting case `0 < d` one
can omit the `⨆ (ht : ¬set.subsingleton (t n))` part.
## Main statements
### Basic properties
* `measure_theory.outer_measure.is_metric.borel_le_caratheodory`: if `μ` is a metric outer measure
on an extended metric space `X` (that is, it is additive on pairs of metric separated sets), then
every Borel set is Caratheodory measurable (hence, `μ` defines an actual
`measure_theory.measure`). See also `measure_theory.measure.mk_metric`.
* `measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_mono`: `μH[d] s` is an antitone function
of `d`.
* `measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure_zero_or_top`: if `d₁ < d₂`, then for any `s`, either
`μH[d₂] s = 0` or `μH[d₁] s = ∞`. Together with the previous lemma, this means that `μH[d] s` is
equal to infinity on some ray `(-∞, D)` and is equal to zero on `(D, +∞)`, where `D` is a possibly
infinite number called the *Hausdorff dimension* of `s`; `μH[D] s` can be zero, infinity, or
anything in between.
* `measure_theory.measure.no_atoms_hausdorff`: Hausdorff measure has no atoms.
### Hausdorff measure in `ℝⁿ`
* `measure_theory.hausdorff_measure_pi_real`: for a nonempty `ι`, `μH[card ι]` on `ι → ℝ` equals
Lebesgue measure.
## Notations
We use the following notation localized in `measure_theory`.
- `μH[d]` : `measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure d`
## Implementation notes
There are a few similar constructions called the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure. E.g., some
sources only allow coverings by balls and use `r ^ d` instead of `(diam s) ^ d`. While these
construction lead to different Hausdorff measures, they lead to the same notion of the Hausdorff
dimension.
## TODO
* prove that `1`-dimensional Hausdorff measure on `ℝ` equals `volume`;
* prove a similar statement for `ℝ × ℝ`.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.10][Federer1996]
## Tags
Hausdorff measure, measure, metric measure
-/
open_locale nnreal ennreal topological_space big_operators
open emetric set function filter encodable finite_dimensional topological_space
noncomputable theory
variables {ι X Y : Type*} [emetric_space X] [emetric_space Y]
namespace measure_theory
namespace outer_measure
/-!
### Metric outer measures
In this section we define metric outer measures and prove Caratheodory theorem: a metric outer
measure has the Caratheodory property.
-/
/-- We say that an outer measure `μ` in an (e)metric space is *metric* if `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`
for any two metric separated sets `s`, `t`. -/
def is_metric (μ : outer_measure X) : Prop :=
∀ (s t : set X), is_metric_separated s t → μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t
namespace is_metric
variables {μ : outer_measure X}
/-- A metric outer measure is additive on a finite set of pairwise metric separated sets. -/
lemma finset_Union_of_pairwise_separated (hm : is_metric μ) {I : finset ι} {s : ι → set X}
(hI : ∀ (i ∈ I) (j ∈ I), i ≠ j → is_metric_separated (s i) (s j)) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) = ∑ i in I, μ (s i) :=
begin
classical,
induction I using finset.induction_on with i I hiI ihI hI, { simp },
simp only [finset.mem_insert] at hI,
rw [finset.set_bUnion_insert, hm, ihI, finset.sum_insert hiI],
exacts [λ i hi j hj hij, (hI i (or.inr hi) j (or.inr hj) hij),
is_metric_separated.finset_Union_right
(λ j hj, hI i (or.inl rfl) j (or.inr hj) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hiI).symm)]
end
/-- Caratheodory theorem. If `m` is a metric outer measure, then every Borel measurable set `t` is
Caratheodory measurable: for any (not necessarily measurable) set `s` we have
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s`. -/
lemma borel_le_caratheodory (hm : is_metric μ) :
borel X ≤ μ.caratheodory :=
begin
rw [borel_eq_generate_from_is_closed],
refine measurable_space.generate_from_le (λ t ht, μ.is_caratheodory_iff_le.2 $ λ s, _),
set S : ℕ → set X := λ n, {x ∈ s | (↑n)⁻¹ ≤ inf_edist x t},
have n0 : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (n⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0, from λ n, ennreal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ennreal.nat_ne_top _),
have Ssep : ∀ n, is_metric_separated (S n) t,
from λ n, ⟨n⁻¹, n0, λ x hx y hy, hx.2.trans $ inf_edist_le_edist_of_mem hy⟩,
have Ssep' : ∀ n, is_metric_separated (S n) (s ∩ t),
from λ n, (Ssep n).mono subset.rfl (inter_subset_right _ _),
have S_sub : ∀ n, S n ⊆ s \ t,
from λ n, subset_inter (inter_subset_left _ _) (Ssep n).subset_compl_right,
have hSs : ∀ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) ≤ μ s, from λ n,
calc μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) = μ (s ∩ t ∪ S n) :
eq.symm $ hm _ _ $ (Ssep' n).symm
... ≤ μ (s ∩ t ∪ s \ t) : by { mono*, exact le_rfl }
... = μ s : by rw [inter_union_diff],
have Union_S : (⋃ n, S n) = s \ t,
{ refine subset.antisymm (Union_subset S_sub) _,
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩,
rw mem_iff_inf_edist_zero_of_closed ht at hxt,
rcases ennreal.exists_inv_nat_lt hxt with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact mem_Union.2 ⟨n, hxs, hn.le⟩ },
/- Now we have `∀ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) ≤ μ s` and we need to prove
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ μ s`. We can't pass to the limit because
`μ` is only an outer measure. -/
by_cases htop : μ (s \ t) = ∞,
{ rw [htop, ennreal.add_top, ← htop],
exact μ.mono (diff_subset _ _) },
suffices : μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ ⨆ n, μ (S n),
calc μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∩ t) + μ (⋃ n, S n) :
by rw Union_S
... ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + ⨆ n, μ (S n) :
add_le_add le_rfl this
... = ⨆ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) : ennreal.add_supr
... ≤ μ s : supr_le hSs,
/- It suffices to show that `∑' k, μ (S (k + 1) \ S k) ≠ ∞`. Indeed, if we have this,
then for all `N` we have `μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ μ (S N) + ∑' k, m (S (N + k + 1) \ S (N + k))`
and the second term tends to zero, see `outer_measure.Union_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top`
for details. -/
have : ∀ n, S n ⊆ S (n + 1), from λ n x hx,
⟨hx.1, le_trans (ennreal.inv_le_inv.2 $ ennreal.coe_nat_le_coe_nat.2 n.le_succ) hx.2⟩,
refine (μ.Union_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top this _).le, clear this,
/- While the sets `S (k + 1) \ S k` are not pairwise metric separated, the sets in each
subsequence `S (2 * k + 1) \ S (2 * k)` and `S (2 * k + 2) \ S (2 * k)` are metric separated,
so `m` is additive on each of those sequences. -/
rw [← tsum_even_add_odd ennreal.summable ennreal.summable, ennreal.add_ne_top],
suffices : ∀ a, (∑' (k : ℕ), μ (S (2 * k + 1 + a) \ S (2 * k + a))) ≠ ∞,
from ⟨by simpa using this 0, by simpa using this 1⟩,
refine λ r, ne_top_of_le_ne_top htop _,
rw [← Union_S, ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat, supr_le_iff],
intro n,
rw [← hm.finset_Union_of_pairwise_separated],
{ exact μ.mono (Union_subset $ λ i, Union_subset $ λ hi x hx, mem_Union.2 ⟨_, hx.1⟩) },
suffices : ∀ i j, i < j → is_metric_separated (S (2 * i + 1 + r)) (s \ S (2 * j + r)),
from λ i _ j _ hij, hij.lt_or_lt.elim
(λ h, (this i j h).mono (inter_subset_left _ _) (λ x hx, ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩))
(λ h, (this j i h).symm.mono (λ x hx, ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩) (inter_subset_left _ _)),
intros i j hj,
have A : ((↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) < (↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹,
by { rw [ennreal.inv_lt_inv, ennreal.coe_nat_lt_coe_nat], linarith },
refine ⟨(↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ - (↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹, by simpa using A, λ x hx y hy, _⟩,
have : inf_edist y t < (↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹, from not_le.1 (λ hle, hy.2 ⟨hy.1, hle⟩),
rcases inf_edist_lt_iff.mp this with ⟨z, hzt, hyz⟩,
have hxz : (↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ ≤ edist x z, from le_inf_edist.1 hx.2 _ hzt,
apply ennreal.le_of_add_le_add_right hyz.ne_top,
refine le_trans _ (edist_triangle _ _ _),
refine (add_le_add le_rfl hyz.le).trans (eq.trans_le _ hxz),
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le A.le]
end
lemma le_caratheodory [measurable_space X] [borel_space X] (hm : is_metric μ) :
‹measurable_space X› ≤ μ.caratheodory :=
by { rw @borel_space.measurable_eq X _ _, exact hm.borel_le_caratheodory }
end is_metric
/-!
### Constructors of metric outer measures
In this section we provide constructors `measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'` and
`measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric` and prove that these outer measures are metric outer
measures. We also prove basic lemmas about `map`/`comap` of these measures.
-/
/-- Auxiliary definition for `outer_measure.mk_metric'`: given a function on sets
`m : set X → ℝ≥0∞`, returns the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s`
for any set `s` of diameter at most `r`.-/
def mk_metric'.pre (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
outer_measure X :=
bounded_by $ extend (λ s (hs : diam s ≤ r), m s)
/-- Given a function `m : set X → ℝ≥0∞`, `mk_metric' m` is the supremum of `mk_metric'.pre m r`
over `r > 0`. Equivalently, it is the limit of `mk_metric'.pre m r` as `r` tends to zero from
the right. -/
def mk_metric' (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) :
outer_measure X :=
⨆ r > 0, mk_metric'.pre m r
/-- Given a function `m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞` and `r > 0`, let `μ r` be the maximal outer measure such that
`μ s ≤ m (emetric.diam s)` whenever `emetric.diam s < r`. Then
`mk_metric m = ⨆ r > 0, μ r`. -/
def mk_metric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : outer_measure X :=
mk_metric' (λ s, m (diam s))
namespace mk_metric'
variables {m : set X → ℝ≥0∞} {r : ℝ≥0∞} {μ : outer_measure X} {s : set X}
lemma le_pre : μ ≤ pre m r ↔ ∀ s : set X, diam s ≤ r → μ s ≤ m s :=
by simp only [pre, le_bounded_by, extend, le_infi_iff]
lemma pre_le (hs : diam s ≤ r) : pre m r s ≤ m s :=
(bounded_by_le _).trans $ infi_le _ hs
lemma mono_pre (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) {r r' : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r ≤ r') :
pre m r' ≤ pre m r :=
le_pre.2 $ λ s hs, pre_le (hs.trans h)
lemma mono_pre_nat (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) :
monotone (λ k : ℕ, pre m k⁻¹) :=
λ k l h, le_pre.2 $ λ s hs, pre_le (hs.trans $ by simpa)
lemma tendsto_pre (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) (s : set X) :
tendsto (λ r, pre m r s) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 $ mk_metric' m s) :=
begin
rw [← map_coe_Ioi_at_bot, tendsto_map'_iff],
simp only [mk_metric', outer_measure.supr_apply, supr_subtype'],
exact tendsto_at_bot_supr (λ r r' hr, mono_pre _ hr _)
end
lemma tendsto_pre_nat (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) (s : set X) :
tendsto (λ n : ℕ, pre m n⁻¹ s) at_top (𝓝 $ mk_metric' m s) :=
begin
refine (tendsto_pre m s).comp (tendsto_inf.2 ⟨ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero, _⟩),
refine tendsto_principal.2 (eventually_of_forall $ λ n, _),
simp
end
lemma eq_supr_nat (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) :
mk_metric' m = ⨆ n : ℕ, mk_metric'.pre m n⁻¹ :=
begin
ext1 s,
rw supr_apply,
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (mk_metric'.tendsto_pre_nat m s)
(tendsto_at_top_supr $ λ k l hkl, mk_metric'.mono_pre_nat m hkl s)
end
/-- `measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'.pre m r` is a trimmed measure provided that
`m (closure s) = m s` for any set `s`. -/
lemma trim_pre [measurable_space X] [opens_measurable_space X]
(m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) (hcl : ∀ s, m (closure s) = m s) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(pre m r).trim = pre m r :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_pre.2 $ λ s hs, _) (le_trim _),
rw trim_eq_infi,
refine (infi_le_of_le (closure s) $ infi_le_of_le subset_closure $
infi_le_of_le measurable_set_closure ((pre_le _).trans_eq (hcl _))),
rwa diam_closure
end
end mk_metric'
/-- An outer measure constructed using `outer_measure.mk_metric'` is a metric outer measure. -/
lemma mk_metric'_is_metric (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mk_metric' m).is_metric :=
begin
rintros s t ⟨r, r0, hr⟩,
refine tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventually_eq
(mk_metric'.tendsto_pre _ _)
((mk_metric'.tendsto_pre _ _).add (mk_metric'.tendsto_pre _ _)) _,
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero] at r0,
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, r0⟩],
rintro ε ⟨ε0, εr⟩,
refine bounded_by_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter _,
rintro u ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hyt, hyu⟩,
have : ε < diam u, from εr.trans_le ((hr x hxs y hyt).trans $ edist_le_diam_of_mem hxu hyu),
exact infi_eq_top.2 (λ h, (this.not_le h).elim)
end
/-- If `c ∉ {0, ∞}` and `m₁ d ≤ c * m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0`
(we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then `mk_metric m₁ hm₁ ≤ c • mk_metric m₂ hm₂`. -/
lemma mk_metric_mono_smul {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) (h0 : c ≠ 0)
(hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] c • m₂) :
(mk_metric m₁ : outer_measure X) ≤ c • mk_metric m₂ :=
begin
classical,
rcases (mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset' ennreal.zero_lt_one).1 hle with ⟨r, hr0, hr⟩,
refine λ s, le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto (mk_metric'.tendsto_pre _ s)
(ennreal.tendsto.const_mul (mk_metric'.tendsto_pre _ s) (or.inr hc))
(mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, hr0⟩) (λ r' hr', _)),
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, mk_metric'.pre, ring_hom.id_apply],
rw [←smul_eq_mul, ← smul_apply, smul_bounded_by hc],
refine le_bounded_by.2 (λ t, (bounded_by_le _).trans _) _,
simp only [smul_eq_mul, pi.smul_apply, extend, infi_eq_if],
split_ifs with ht ht,
{ apply hr,
exact ⟨zero_le _, ht.trans_lt hr'.2⟩ },
{ simp [h0] }
end
/-- If `m₁ d ≤ m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0` (we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then
`mk_metric m₁ hm₁ ≤ mk_metric m₂ hm₂`-/
lemma mk_metric_mono {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] m₂) :
(mk_metric m₁ : outer_measure X) ≤ mk_metric m₂ :=
by { convert mk_metric_mono_smul ennreal.one_ne_top ennreal.zero_lt_one.ne' _; simp * }
lemma isometry_comap_mk_metric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {f : X → Y} (hf : isometry f)
(H : monotone m ∨ surjective f) :
comap f (mk_metric m) = mk_metric m :=
begin
simp only [mk_metric, mk_metric', mk_metric'.pre, induced_outer_measure, comap_supr],
refine surjective_id.supr_congr id (λ ε, surjective_id.supr_congr id $ λ hε, _),
rw comap_bounded_by _ (H.imp (λ h_mono, _) id),
{ congr' with s : 1,
apply extend_congr,
{ simp [hf.ediam_image] },
{ intros, simp [hf.injective.subsingleton_image_iff, hf.ediam_image] } },
{ assume s t hst,
simp only [extend, le_infi_iff],
assume ht,
apply le_trans _ (h_mono (diam_mono hst)),
simp only [(diam_mono hst).trans ht, le_refl, cinfi_pos] }
end
lemma isometry_map_mk_metric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {f : X → Y} (hf : isometry f)
(H : monotone m ∨ surjective f) :
map f (mk_metric m) = restrict (range f) (mk_metric m) :=
by rw [← isometry_comap_mk_metric _ hf H, map_comap]
lemma isometric_comap_mk_metric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (f : X ≃ᵢ Y) :
comap f (mk_metric m) = mk_metric m :=
isometry_comap_mk_metric _ f.isometry (or.inr f.surjective)
lemma isometric_map_mk_metric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (f : X ≃ᵢ Y) :
map f (mk_metric m) = mk_metric m :=
by rw [← isometric_comap_mk_metric _ f, map_comap_of_surjective f.surjective]
lemma trim_mk_metric [measurable_space X] [borel_space X] (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mk_metric m : outer_measure X).trim = mk_metric m :=
begin
simp only [mk_metric, mk_metric'.eq_supr_nat, trim_supr],
congr' 1 with n : 1,
refine mk_metric'.trim_pre _ (λ s, _) _,
simp
end
lemma le_mk_metric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : outer_measure X)
(r : ℝ≥0∞) (h0 : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ s, diam s ≤ r → μ s ≤ m (diam s)) :
μ ≤ mk_metric m :=
le_supr₂_of_le r h0 $ mk_metric'.le_pre.2 $ λ s hs, hr _ hs
end outer_measure
/-!
### Metric measures
In this section we use `measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure` and theorems about
`measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric'`/`measure_theory.outer_measure.mk_metric` to define
`measure_theory.measure.mk_metric'`/`measure_theory.measure.mk_metric`. We also restate some lemmas
about metric outer measures for metric measures.
-/
namespace measure
variables [measurable_space X] [borel_space X]
/-- Given a function `m : set X → ℝ≥0∞`, `mk_metric' m` is the supremum of `μ r`
over `r > 0`, where `μ r` is the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s`
for all `s`. While each `μ r` is an *outer* measure, the supremum is a measure. -/
def mk_metric' (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) : measure X :=
(outer_measure.mk_metric' m).to_measure (outer_measure.mk_metric'_is_metric _).le_caratheodory
/-- Given a function `m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞`, `mk_metric m` is the supremum of `μ r` over `r > 0`, where
`μ r` is the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s` for all sets `s` that contain at least
two points. While each `mk_metric'.pre` is an *outer* measure, the supremum is a measure. -/
def mk_metric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : measure X :=
(outer_measure.mk_metric m).to_measure (outer_measure.mk_metric'_is_metric _).le_caratheodory
@[simp] lemma mk_metric'_to_outer_measure (m : set X → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mk_metric' m).to_outer_measure = (outer_measure.mk_metric' m).trim :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_metric_to_outer_measure (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mk_metric m : measure X).to_outer_measure = outer_measure.mk_metric m :=
outer_measure.trim_mk_metric m
end measure
lemma outer_measure.coe_mk_metric [measurable_space X] [borel_space X] (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
⇑(outer_measure.mk_metric m : outer_measure X) = measure.mk_metric m :=
by rw [← measure.mk_metric_to_outer_measure, coe_to_outer_measure]
namespace measure
variables [measurable_space X] [borel_space X]
/-- If `c ∉ {0, ∞}` and `m₁ d ≤ c * m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0`
(we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then `mk_metric m₁ hm₁ ≤ c • mk_metric m₂ hm₂`. -/
lemma mk_metric_mono_smul {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) (h0 : c ≠ 0)
(hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] c • m₂) :
(mk_metric m₁ : measure X) ≤ c • mk_metric m₂ :=
begin
intros s hs,
rw [← outer_measure.coe_mk_metric, coe_smul, ← outer_measure.coe_mk_metric],
exact outer_measure.mk_metric_mono_smul hc h0 hle s
end
/-- If `m₁ d ≤ m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0` (we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then
`mk_metric m₁ hm₁ ≤ mk_metric m₂ hm₂`-/
lemma mk_metric_mono {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] m₂) :
(mk_metric m₁ : measure X) ≤ mk_metric m₂ :=
by { convert mk_metric_mono_smul ennreal.one_ne_top ennreal.zero_lt_one.ne' _; simp * }
/-- A formula for `measure_theory.measure.mk_metric`. -/
lemma mk_metric_apply (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (s : set X) :
mk_metric m s = ⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : 0 < r),
⨅ (t : ℕ → set X) (h : s ⊆ Union t) (h' : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ (h : (t n).nonempty), m (diam (t n)) :=
begin
-- We mostly unfold the definitions but we need to switch the order of `∑'` and `⨅`
classical,
simp only [← outer_measure.coe_mk_metric, outer_measure.mk_metric, outer_measure.mk_metric',
outer_measure.supr_apply, outer_measure.mk_metric'.pre, outer_measure.bounded_by_apply,
extend],
refine surjective_id.supr_congr (λ r, r) (λ r, supr_congr_Prop iff.rfl $ λ hr,
surjective_id.infi_congr _ $ λ t, infi_congr_Prop iff.rfl $ λ ht, _),
dsimp,
by_cases htr : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r,
{ rw [infi_eq_if, if_pos htr],
congr' 1 with n : 1,
simp only [infi_eq_if, htr n, id, if_true, supr_and'] },
{ rw [infi_eq_if, if_neg htr],
push_neg at htr, rcases htr with ⟨n, hn⟩,
refine ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨n, _⟩,
rw [supr_eq_if, if_pos, infi_eq_if, if_neg],
exact hn.not_le,
rcases diam_pos_iff.1 ((zero_le r).trans_lt hn) with ⟨x, hx, -⟩,
exact ⟨x, hx⟩ }
end
lemma le_mk_metric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : measure X) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (h₀ : 0 < ε)
(h : ∀ s : set X, diam s ≤ ε → μ s ≤ m (diam s)) :
μ ≤ mk_metric m :=
begin
rw [← to_outer_measure_le, mk_metric_to_outer_measure],
exact outer_measure.le_mk_metric m μ.to_outer_measure ε h₀ h
end
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure (or, more generally, for a measure defined using
`measure_theory.measure.mk_metric`) of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending to
`0`, indexed by any sequence of encodable types. -/
lemma mk_metric_le_liminf_tsum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [∀ n, encodable (ι n)] (s : set X)
{l : filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : tendsto r l (𝓝 0)) (t : Π (n : β), ι n → set X)
(ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n) (hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i)
(m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
mk_metric m s ≤ liminf l (λ n, ∑' i, m (diam (t n i))) :=
begin
simp only [mk_metric_apply],
refine supr₂_le (λ ε hε, _),
refine le_of_forall_le_of_dense (λ c hc, _),
rcases ((frequently_lt_of_liminf_lt (by apply_auto_param) hc).and_eventually
((hr.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hε)).and (ht.and hst))).exists with ⟨n, hn, hrn, htn, hstn⟩,
set u : ℕ → set X := λ j, ⋃ b ∈ decode₂ (ι n) j, t n b,
refine infi₂_le_of_le u (by rwa Union_decode₂) _,
refine infi_le_of_le (λ j, _) _,
{ rw emetric.diam_Union_mem_option,
exact supr₂_le (λ _ _, (htn _).trans hrn.le) },
{ calc (∑' (j : ℕ), ⨆ (h : (u j).nonempty), m (diam (u j))) = _ :
tsum_Union_decode₂ (λ t : set X, ⨆ (h : t.nonempty), m (diam t)) (by simp) _
... ≤ ∑' (i : ι n), m (diam (t n i)) :
ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ b, supr_le $ λ htb, le_rfl)
... ≤ c : hn.le }
end
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure (or, more generally, for a measure defined using
`measure_theory.measure.mk_metric`) of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending to
`0`, indexed by any sequence of finite types. -/
lemma mk_metric_le_liminf_sum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [hι : ∀ n, fintype (ι n)] (s : set X)
{l : filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : tendsto r l (𝓝 0)) (t : Π (n : β), ι n → set X)
(ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n) (hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i)
(m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
mk_metric m s ≤ liminf l (λ n, ∑ i, m (diam (t n i))) :=
begin
haveI : ∀ n, encodable (ι n), from λ n, fintype.to_encodable _,
simpa only [tsum_fintype] using mk_metric_le_liminf_tsum s r hr t ht hst m,
end
/-!
### Hausdorff measure and Hausdorff dimension
-/
/-- Hausdorff measure on an (e)metric space. -/
def hausdorff_measure (d : ℝ) : measure X := mk_metric (λ r, r ^ d)
localized "notation `μH[` d `]` := measure_theory.measure.hausdorff_measure d" in measure_theory
lemma le_hausdorff_measure (d : ℝ) (μ : measure X) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (h₀ : 0 < ε)
(h : ∀ s : set X, diam s ≤ ε → μ s ≤ diam s ^ d) :
μ ≤ μH[d] :=
le_mk_metric _ μ ε h₀ h
/-- A formula for `μH[d] s`. -/
lemma hausdorff_measure_apply (d : ℝ) (s : set X) :
μH[d] s = ⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : 0 < r), ⨅ (t : ℕ → set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n)
(ht : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r), ∑' n, ⨆ (h : (t n).nonempty), (diam (t n)) ^ d :=
mk_metric_apply _ _
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending
to `0`, indexed by any sequence of encodable types. -/
lemma hausdorff_measure_le_liminf_tsum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [hι : ∀ n, encodable (ι n)]
(d : ℝ) (s : set X)
{l : filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : tendsto r l (𝓝 0)) (t : Π (n : β), ι n → set X)
(ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n) (hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) :
μH[d] s ≤ liminf l (λ n, ∑' i, diam (t n i) ^ d) :=
mk_metric_le_liminf_tsum s r hr t ht hst _
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending
to `0`, indexed by any sequence of finite types. -/
lemma hausdorff_measure_le_liminf_sum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [hι : ∀ n, fintype (ι n)]
(d : ℝ) (s : set X)
{l : filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : tendsto r l (𝓝 0)) (t : Π (n : β), ι n → set X)
(ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n) (hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) :
μH[d] s ≤ liminf l (λ n, ∑ i, diam (t n i) ^ d) :=
mk_metric_le_liminf_sum s r hr t ht hst _
/-- If `d₁ < d₂`, then for any set `s` we have either `μH[d₂] s = 0`, or `μH[d₁] s = ∞`. -/
lemma hausdorff_measure_zero_or_top {d₁ d₂ : ℝ} (h : d₁ < d₂) (s : set X) :
μH[d₂] s = 0 ∨ μH[d₁] s = ∞ :=
begin
by_contra' H,
suffices : ∀ (c : ℝ≥0), c ≠ 0 → μH[d₂] s ≤ c * μH[d₁] s,
{ rcases ennreal.exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt H.2 H.1 with ⟨c, hc0, hc⟩,
exact hc.not_le (this c (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hc0)) },
intros c hc,
refine le_iff'.1 (mk_metric_mono_smul ennreal.coe_ne_top (by exact_mod_cast hc) _) s,
have : 0 < (c ^ (d₂ - d₁)⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞),
{ rw [ennreal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hc, pos_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, ennreal.coe_eq_zero,
nnreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff],
exact mt and.left hc },
filter_upwards [Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ici ⟨le_rfl, this⟩],
rintro r ⟨hr₀, hrc⟩,
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hrc,
rw [pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ← ennreal.div_le_iff_le_mul (or.inr ennreal.coe_ne_top)
(or.inr $ mt ennreal.coe_eq_zero.1 hc)],
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with rfl|hr₀,
{ rcases lt_or_le 0 d₂ with h₂|h₂,
{ simp only [h₂, ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_le', ennreal.coe_nonneg, ennreal.zero_div,
ennreal.coe_zero] },
{ simp only [h.trans_le h₂, ennreal.div_top, zero_le', ennreal.coe_nonneg,
ennreal.zero_rpow_of_neg, ennreal.coe_zero] } },
{ have : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0, by simpa only [ennreal.coe_eq_zero, ne.def] using hr₀,
rw [← ennreal.rpow_sub _ _ this ennreal.coe_ne_top],
refine (ennreal.rpow_lt_rpow hrc (sub_pos.2 h)).le.trans _,
rw [← ennreal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel (sub_pos.2 h).ne', ennreal.rpow_one],
exact le_rfl }
end
/-- Hausdorff measure `μH[d] s` is monotone in `d`. -/
lemma hausdorff_measure_mono {d₁ d₂ : ℝ} (h : d₁ ≤ d₂) (s : set X) : μH[d₂] s ≤ μH[d₁] s :=
begin
rcases h.eq_or_lt with rfl|h, { exact le_rfl },
cases hausdorff_measure_zero_or_top h s with hs hs,
{ rw hs, exact zero_le _ },
{ rw hs, exact le_top }
end
variables (X)
lemma no_atoms_hausdorff {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 < d) : has_no_atoms (hausdorff_measure d : measure X) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x, _⟩,
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, hausdorff_measure_apply],
refine supr₂_le (λ ε ε0, infi₂_le_of_le (λ n, {x}) _ $ infi_le_of_le (λ n, _) _),
{ exact subset_Union (λ n, {x} : ℕ → set X) 0 },
{ simp only [emetric.diam_singleton, zero_le] },
{ simp [hd] }
end
variables {X}
@[simp] lemma hausdorff_measure_zero_singleton (x : X) : μH[0] ({x} : set X) = 1 :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ let r : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞ := λ _, 0,
let t : ℕ → unit → set X := λ n _, {x},
have ht : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n,
by simp only [implies_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, diam_singleton, eventually_at_top,
nonpos_iff_eq_zero, exists_const],
simpa [liminf_const] using hausdorff_measure_le_liminf_sum 0 {x} r tendsto_const_nhds t ht },
{ rw hausdorff_measure_apply,
suffices : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ⨅ (t : ℕ → set X) (hts : {x} ⊆ ⋃ n, t n)
(ht : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ 1), ∑' n, ⨆ (h : (t n).nonempty), (diam (t n)) ^ (0 : ℝ),
{ apply le_trans this _,
convert le_supr₂ (1 : ℝ≥0∞) (ennreal.zero_lt_one),
refl },
simp only [ennreal.rpow_zero, le_infi_iff],
assume t hst h't,
rcases mem_Union.1 (hst (mem_singleton x)) with ⟨m, hm⟩,
have A : (t m).nonempty := ⟨x, hm⟩,
calc (1 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨆ (h : (t m).nonempty), 1 : by simp only [A, csupr_pos]
... ≤ ∑' n, ⨆ (h : (t n).nonempty), 1 : ennreal.le_tsum _ }
end
lemma one_le_hausdorff_measure_zero_of_nonempty {s : set X} (h : s.nonempty) :
1 ≤ μH[0] s :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
calc (1 : ℝ≥0∞) = μH[0] ({x} : set X) : (hausdorff_measure_zero_singleton x).symm
... ≤ μH[0] s : measure_mono (singleton_subset_iff.2 hx)
end
lemma hausdorff_measure_le_one_of_subsingleton
{s : set X} (hs : s.subsingleton) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
μH[d] s ≤ 1 :=
begin
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|⟨x, hx⟩,
{ simp only [measure_empty, zero_le] },
{ rw (subsingleton_iff_singleton hx).1 hs,
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with rfl|dpos,
{ simp only [le_refl, hausdorff_measure_zero_singleton] },
{ haveI := no_atoms_hausdorff X dpos,
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton] } }
end
end measure
open_locale measure_theory
open measure
/-!
### Hausdorff measure and Lebesgue measure
-/
/-- In the space `ι → ℝ`, Hausdorff measure coincides exactly with Lebesgue measure. -/
@[simp] theorem hausdorff_measure_pi_real {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] :
(μH[fintype.card ι] : measure (ι → ℝ)) = volume :=
begin
classical,
-- it suffices to check that the two measures coincide on products of rational intervals
refine (pi_eq_generate_from (λ i, real.borel_eq_generate_from_Ioo_rat.symm)
(λ i, real.is_pi_system_Ioo_rat) (λ i, real.finite_spanning_sets_in_Ioo_rat _)
_).symm,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
-- fix such a product `s` of rational intervals, of the form `Π (a i, b i)`.
intros s hs,
choose a b H using hs,
obtain rfl : s = λ i, Ioo (a i) (b i), from funext (λ i, (H i).2), replace H := λ i, (H i).1,
apply le_antisymm _,
-- first check that `volume s ≤ μH s`
{ have Hle : volume ≤ (μH[fintype.card ι] : measure (ι → ℝ)),
{ refine le_hausdorff_measure _ _ ∞ ennreal.coe_lt_top (λ s _, _),
rw [ennreal.rpow_nat_cast],
exact real.volume_pi_le_diam_pow s },
rw [← volume_pi_pi (λ i, Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i))],
exact measure.le_iff'.1 Hle _ },
/- For the other inequality `μH s ≤ volume s`, we use a covering of `s` by sets of small diameter
`1/n`, namely cubes with left-most point of the form `a i + f i / n` with `f i` ranging between
`0` and `⌈(b i - a i) * n⌉`. Their number is asymptotic to `n^d * Π (b i - a i)`. -/
have I : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (b i : ℝ) - a i := λ i, by simpa only [sub_nonneg, rat.cast_le] using (H i).le,
let γ := λ (n : ℕ), (Π (i : ι), fin ⌈((b i : ℝ) - a i) * n⌉₊),
let t : Π (n : ℕ), γ n → set (ι → ℝ) :=
λ n f, set.pi univ (λ i, Icc (a i + f i / n) (a i + (f i + 1) / n)),
have A : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 1/(n : ℝ≥0∞)) at_top (𝓝 0),
by simp only [one_div, ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero],
have B : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, ∀ (i : γ n), diam (t n i) ≤ 1 / n,
{ apply eventually_at_top.2 ⟨1, λ n hn, _⟩,
assume f,
apply diam_pi_le_of_le (λ b, _),
simp only [real.ediam_Icc, add_div, ennreal.of_real_div_of_pos (nat.cast_pos.mpr hn), le_refl,
add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, add_sub_cancel', ennreal.of_real_one, ennreal.of_real_coe_nat] },
have C : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, set.pi univ (λ (i : ι), Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)) ⊆ ⋃ (i : γ n), t n i,
{ apply eventually_at_top.2 ⟨1, λ n hn, _⟩,
have npos : (0 : ℝ) < n := nat.cast_pos.2 hn,
assume x hx,
simp only [mem_Ioo, mem_univ_pi] at hx,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_Ioo, mem_univ_pi, coe_coe],
let f : γ n := λ i, ⟨⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊,
begin
apply nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos,
{ refine (mul_lt_mul_right npos).2 _,
simp only [(hx i).right, sub_lt_sub_iff_right] },
{ refine mul_pos _ npos,
simpa only [rat.cast_lt, sub_pos] using H i }
end⟩,
refine ⟨f, λ i, ⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ calc (a i : ℝ) + ⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊ / n
≤ (a i : ℝ) + ((x i - a i) * n) / n :
begin
refine add_le_add le_rfl ((div_le_div_right npos).2 _),
exact nat.floor_le (mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 (hx i).1.le) npos.le),
end
... = x i : by field_simp [npos.ne'] },
{ calc x i
= (a i : ℝ) + ((x i - a i) * n) / n : by field_simp [npos.ne']
... ≤ (a i : ℝ) + (⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊ + 1) / n :
add_le_add le_rfl ((div_le_div_right npos).2 (nat.lt_floor_add_one _).le) } },
calc μH[fintype.card ι] (set.pi univ (λ (i : ι), Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)))
≤ liminf at_top (λ (n : ℕ), ∑ (i : γ n), diam (t n i) ^ ↑(fintype.card ι)) :
hausdorff_measure_le_liminf_sum _ (set.pi univ (λ i, Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)))
(λ (n : ℕ), 1/(n : ℝ≥0∞)) A t B C
... ≤ liminf at_top (λ (n : ℕ), ∑ (i : γ n), (1/n) ^ (fintype.card ι)) :
begin
refine liminf_le_liminf _ (by is_bounded_default),
filter_upwards [B] with _ hn,
apply finset.sum_le_sum (λ i _, _),
rw ennreal.rpow_nat_cast,
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_left' (hn i) _,
end
... = liminf at_top (λ (n : ℕ), ∏ (i : ι), (⌈((b i : ℝ) - a i) * n⌉₊ : ℝ≥0∞) / n) :
begin
simp only [finset.card_univ, nat.cast_prod, one_mul, fintype.card_fin,
finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, fintype.card_pi, div_eq_mul_inv, finset.prod_mul_distrib,
finset.prod_const]
end
... = ∏ (i : ι), volume (Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)) :
begin
simp only [real.volume_Ioo],
apply tendsto.liminf_eq,
refine ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top _ (λ i hi, _) (λ i hi, _),
{ apply tendsto.congr' _ ((ennreal.continuous_of_real.tendsto _).comp
((tendsto_nat_ceil_mul_div_at_top (I i)).comp tendsto_coe_nat_at_top_at_top)),
apply eventually_at_top.2 ⟨1, λ n hn, _⟩,
simp only [ennreal.of_real_div_of_pos (nat.cast_pos.mpr hn), comp_app,
ennreal.of_real_coe_nat] },
{ simp only [ennreal.of_real_ne_top, ne.def, not_false_iff] }
end
end
end measure_theory
/-!
### Hausdorff measure, Hausdorff dimension, and Hölder or Lipschitz continuous maps
-/
open_locale measure_theory
open measure_theory measure_theory.measure
variables [measurable_space X] [borel_space X] [measurable_space Y] [borel_space Y]
namespace holder_on_with
variables {C r : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y} {s t : set X}
/-- If `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous on `s` with a positive exponent `r`, then
`μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ C ^ d * μH[r * d] s`. -/
lemma hausdorff_measure_image_le (h : holder_on_with C r f s) (hr : 0 < r) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ C ^ d * μH[r * d] s :=
begin
-- We start with the trivial case `C = 0`
rcases (zero_le C).eq_or_lt with rfl|hC0,
{ rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|⟨x, hx⟩,
{ simp only [measure_empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_zero, image_empty] },
have : f '' s = {f x},
{ have : (f '' s).subsingleton, by simpa [diam_eq_zero_iff] using h.ediam_image_le,
exact (subsingleton_iff_singleton (mem_image_of_mem f hx)).1 this },
rw this,
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with rfl|h'd,
{ simp only [ennreal.rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_zero],
rw hausdorff_measure_zero_singleton,
exact one_le_hausdorff_measure_zero_of_nonempty ⟨x, hx⟩ },
{ haveI := no_atoms_hausdorff Y h'd,
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton] } },
-- Now assume `C ≠ 0`
{ have hCd0 : (C : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ 0, by simp [hC0.ne'],
have hCd : (C : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ ∞, by simp [hd],
simp only [hausdorff_measure_apply, ennreal.mul_supr, ennreal.mul_infi_of_ne hCd0 hCd,
← ennreal.tsum_mul_left],
refine supr_le (λ R, supr_le $ λ hR, _),
have : tendsto (λ d : ℝ≥0∞, (C : ℝ≥0∞) * d ^ (r : ℝ)) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0),
from ennreal.tendsto_const_mul_rpow_nhds_zero_of_pos ennreal.coe_ne_top hr,
rcases ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic.eventually_iff.1 (this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hR))
with ⟨δ, δ0, H⟩,
refine le_supr₂_of_le δ δ0 (infi₂_mono' $ λ t hst, ⟨λ n, f '' (t n ∩ s), _, infi_mono' $ λ htδ,
⟨λ n, (h.ediam_image_inter_le (t n)).trans (H (htδ n)).le, _⟩⟩),
{ rw [← image_Union, ← Union_inter],
exact image_subset _ (subset_inter hst subset.rfl) },
{ apply ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ n, _),
simp only [supr_le_iff, nonempty_image_iff],
assume hft,
simp only [nonempty.mono ((t n).inter_subset_left s) hft, csupr_pos],
rw [ennreal.rpow_mul, ← ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hd],
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow (h.ediam_image_inter_le _) hd } }
end
end holder_on_with
namespace lipschitz_on_with
variables {K : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y} {s t : set X}
/-- If `f : X → Y` is `K`-Lipschitz on `s`, then `μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ K ^ d * μH[d] s`. -/
lemma hausdorff_measure_image_le (h : lipschitz_on_with K f s) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ K ^ d * μH[d] s :=
by simpa only [nnreal.coe_one, one_mul]
using h.holder_on_with.hausdorff_measure_image_le zero_lt_one hd
end lipschitz_on_with
namespace lipschitz_with
variables {K : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y}
/-- If `f` is a `K`-Lipschitz map, then it increases the Hausdorff `d`-measures of sets at most
by the factor of `K ^ d`.-/
lemma hausdorff_measure_image_le (h : lipschitz_with K f) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : set X) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ K ^ d * μH[d] s :=
(h.lipschitz_on_with s).hausdorff_measure_image_le hd
end lipschitz_with
/-!
### Antilipschitz maps do not decrease Hausdorff measures and dimension
-/
namespace antilipschitz_with
variables {f : X → Y} {K : ℝ≥0} {d : ℝ}
lemma hausdorff_measure_preimage_le (hf : antilipschitz_with K f) (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : set Y) :
μH[d] (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ K ^ d * μH[d] s :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne K 0 with rfl|h0,
{ rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (f ⁻¹' s) with hs|⟨x, hx⟩,
{ simp only [hs, measure_empty, zero_le], },
have : f ⁻¹' s = {x},
{ haveI : subsingleton X := hf.subsingleton,
have : (f ⁻¹' s).subsingleton, from subsingleton_univ.anti (subset_univ _),
exact (subsingleton_iff_singleton hx).1 this },
rw this,
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with rfl|h'd,
{ simp only [ennreal.rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_zero],
rw hausdorff_measure_zero_singleton,
exact one_le_hausdorff_measure_zero_of_nonempty ⟨f x, hx⟩ },
{ haveI := no_atoms_hausdorff X h'd,
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton] } },
have hKd0 : (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ 0, by simp [h0],
have hKd : (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ ∞, by simp [hd],
simp only [hausdorff_measure_apply, ennreal.mul_supr, ennreal.mul_infi_of_ne hKd0 hKd,
← ennreal.tsum_mul_left],
refine supr₂_le (λ ε ε0, _),
refine le_supr₂_of_le (ε / K) (by simp [ε0.ne']) _,
refine le_infi₂ (λ t hst, le_infi $ λ htε, _),
replace hst : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ _ := preimage_mono hst, rw preimage_Union at hst,
refine infi₂_le_of_le _ hst (infi_le_of_le (λ n, _) _),
{ exact (hf.ediam_preimage_le _).trans (ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div' $ htε n) },
{ refine ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ n, supr_le_iff.2 (λ hft, _)),
simp only [nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage hft, csupr_pos],
rw [← ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hd],
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow (hf.ediam_preimage_le _) hd }
end
lemma le_hausdorff_measure_image (hf : antilipschitz_with K f) (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : set X) :
μH[d] s ≤ K ^ d * μH[d] (f '' s) :=
calc μH[d] s ≤ μH[d] (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) : measure_mono (subset_preimage_image _ _)
... ≤ K ^ d * μH[d] (f '' s) : hf.hausdorff_measure_preimage_le hd (f '' s)
end antilipschitz_with
/-!
### Isometries preserve the Hausdorff measure and Hausdorff dimension
-/
namespace isometry
variables {f : X → Y} {d : ℝ}
lemma hausdorff_measure_image (hf : isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ surjective f) (s : set X) :
μH[d] (f '' s) = μH[d] s :=
begin
simp only [hausdorff_measure, ← outer_measure.coe_mk_metric, ← outer_measure.comap_apply],
rw [outer_measure.isometry_comap_mk_metric _ hf (hd.imp_left _)],
exact λ hd x y hxy, ennreal.rpow_le_rpow hxy hd
end
lemma hausdorff_measure_preimage (hf : isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ surjective f) (s : set Y) :
μH[d] (f ⁻¹' s) = μH[d] (s ∩ range f) :=
by rw [← hf.hausdorff_measure_image hd, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
lemma map_hausdorff_measure (hf : isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ surjective f) :
measure.map f μH[d] = (μH[d]).restrict (range f) :=
begin
ext1 s hs,
rw [map_apply hf.continuous.measurable hs, restrict_apply hs, hf.hausdorff_measure_preimage hd]
end
end isometry
namespace isometric
@[simp] lemma hausdorff_measure_image (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) (s : set X) :
μH[d] (e '' s) = μH[d] s :=
e.isometry.hausdorff_measure_image (or.inr e.surjective) s
@[simp] lemma hausdorff_measure_preimage (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) (s : set Y) :
μH[d] (e ⁻¹' s) = μH[d] s :=
by rw [← e.image_symm, e.symm.hausdorff_measure_image]
end isometric
|
dd8ee5fbf1a58e7d06d4630fd2850be681f39a6d | 43390109ab88557e6090f3245c47479c123ee500 | /src/M3P14/Problem_sheets/sheet1.lean | 1bfab42ccda99cd57712c63cb17e43e86e3342f1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Ja1941/xena-UROP-2018 | 41f0956519f94d56b8bf6834a8d39473f4923200 | b111fb87f343cf79eca3b886f99ee15c1dd9884b | refs/heads/master | 1,662,355,955,139 | 1,590,577,325,000 | 1,590,577,325,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,003 | lean | import data.nat.gcd
import data.nat.modeq
import data.nat.prime
import tactic.norm_num
import data.nat.gcd
--import data.set
open classical
namespace int
/-
Mathlib work in progress
-/
theorem gcd_mul_left_mine (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (i * k) = nat_abs i * gcd j k :=
begin
unfold gcd,
rw [nat_abs_mul, nat_abs_mul],
exact nat.gcd_mul_left (nat_abs i) (nat_abs j) (nat_abs k),
end
end int
namespace nat
-- Show that for a, b, d integers, we have (da, db) = d(a,b).
theorem q1a (a b d : ℤ) : int.gcd (d*a) (d*b) = int.nat_abs d * int.gcd a b := int.gcd_mul_left_mine d a b
-- Let a, b, n integers, and suppose that n|ab. Show that n/(a,b) divides b.
theorem q1b (a b n : ℕ) (ha : a > 0) (hn : n > 0) : n ∣ (a*b) → (n / gcd a n) ∣ b := λ h,
have n / gcd n a ∣ b * (a / gcd n a) := dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (gcd_pos_of_pos_left a hn)
begin
rw ← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (gcd_dvd_right n a),
rw nat.div_mul_cancel (gcd_dvd_left n a),
rw mul_comm b,
rwa nat.div_mul_cancel (dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left n a) h),
end,
begin
cases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd h with c hc,
have := coprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
(coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd (gcd_pos_of_pos_left a hn)) this,
rwa gcd_comm,
end
-- Express 18 as an integer linear combination of 327 and 120.
theorem q2a : ∃ x y : ℤ, 18 = 327*x + 120*y :=
⟨-66, 180, by norm_num⟩
-- Find, with proof, all solutions to the linear diophantine equation 110x + 68y = 14.
theorem q2b : ∃ A : set (ℤ×ℤ), ∀ x y : ℤ, (110*x + 68*y = 14 ↔ (x,y) ∈ A ):=
begin
apply exists.intro ∅, --the answer is not ∅
assume x y,
apply iff.intro,
{
sorry,
},
{
intro h,
exact false.elim ‹(x, y) ∈ (∅ : set (ℤ×ℤ))›,
}
end
-- Find a multiplicative inverse of 31 modulo 132.
theorem q2c : ∃ x : ℤ, 31*x % 132 = 1 :=
⟨115, by norm_num⟩
-- Find an integer congruent to 3 mod 9 and congruent to 1 mod 49.
theorem q2d : ∃ x : ℤ, x % 9 = 3 → x % 49 = 1 :=
⟨-195, by norm_num⟩
-- Find, with proof, the smallest nonnegative integer n such that n = 1 (mod 3), n = 4 (mod 5), and n = 3 (mod 7).
theorem extended_chinese_remainder {p q r : ℕ} (co : coprime p q ∧ coprime q r ∧ coprime r p) (a b c: ℕ) :
{k // k ≡ a [MOD p] ∧ k ≡ b [MOD q] ∧ k ≡ c[MOD r]} := sorry
theorem q2e : ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ n₂ : ℕ, n % 3 = 1 ∧ n % 5 = 4 ∧ n % 7 = 3
→ n₂ % 3 = 1 ∧ n₂ % 5 = 4 ∧ n₂ % 7 = 3 → n ≤ n₂
:=
begin
--@extended_chinese_remainder 3 5 7 dec_trivial 1 4 3
let n := 94,
let p := λ n, n % 3 = 1 ∧ n % 5 = 4 ∧ n % 7 = 3,
have h : ∃ n : ℕ, p n, from ⟨94, dec_trivial⟩,
apply exists.intro (nat.find h),
assume n₂ hn hn₂,
exact nat.find_min' h hn₂,
end
-- Let m and n be integers. Show that the greatest common divisor of m and n is the unique positive integer d such that:
-- - d divides both m and n, and
-- - if x divides both m and n, then x divides d.
theorem q3 : ∀ m n : ℕ, ∃! d : ℕ, ∀ x : ℕ, gcd m n = d → d ∣ m → d ∣ n → x ∣ m → x ∣ n → x ∣ d
:=
begin
intros m n,
apply exists_unique.intro (gcd m n),
{
intros x h1 h2 h3 h4 h5,
sorry
},
intros y x,
sorry
end
-- Let a and b be nonzero integers. Show that there is a unique positive integer m with the following two properties:
-- - a and b divide m, and
-- - if n is any number divisible by both a and b, then m|n.
-- The number m is called the least common multiple of a and b.
theorem gcd_dvd_trans {a b c : ℤ} : a ∣ b → b ∣ c → a ∣ c :=
begin
intro Hab,
intro Hbc,
cases Hab with e He,
cases Hbc with f Hf,
existsi e * f,
rw Hf,
rw He,
exact mul_assoc _ _ _,
end
-- TODO: to find in mathlib
-- theorem gcd_eq_pair_number (a b : ℕ) : ∃ x y : ℤ, gcd a b = x*a + b*y := sorry
-- theorem gcd_iff_pair_number (a b d : ℕ) : gcd a b = d ↔ ∃ x y : ℤ, x*a + b*y = d := sorry
theorem coprime_dvd_of_dvd_mul {a b c : ℕ} (h1 : a ∣ c) (h2 : b ∣ c) (h3 : coprime a b) :
a*b ∣ c := sorry
theorem lcm_def (m : ℕ) : ∀ a b : ℕ, (∀ n : ℕ, a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧
a ∣ m ∧ b ∣ m ∧ a ∣ n ∧ b ∣ n → m ∣ n) → m = lcm a b
:=
begin
intros ha hb h,
unfold lcm,
let p := ha ≠ 0 ∧ hb ≠ 0 ∧ ha ∣ m ∧ hb ∣ m ∧ ha ∣ ha * hb / gcd ha hb ∧ hb ∣ ha * hb / gcd ha hb,
have h2 : p → m ∣ ha * hb / gcd ha hb, from h (ha*hb/gcd ha hb),
have m_dvd_def : m ∣ ha*hb/gcd ha hb,
{
/-
by_cases
(assume h3 : p, h2 h3)
(assume h3 : ¬p, sorry)
-/
sorry,
},
have def_dvd_m : (ha*hb/gcd ha hb) ∣ m,
{
sorry,
},
exact dvd_antisymm m_dvd_def def_dvd_m,
end
theorem q4a : ∀ a b : ℕ, ∃! m : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧
a ∣ m ∧ b ∣ m ∧ a ∣ n ∧ b ∣ n → m ∣ n
:=
begin
intro a, intro b,
let m := a*b/(gcd a b),
have m_def : m = a*b/(gcd a b), by simp,
apply exists_unique.intro m,
{
assume n,
assume h,
have a_dvd_n : a ∣ n, from h.right.right.right.right.left,
have b_dvd_n : b ∣ n, from h.right.right.right.right.right,
let a' := a/(gcd a b),
have ap_eq : a/(gcd a b) = a', by simp,
have gcd_dvd_a : (gcd a b) ∣ a, from gcd_dvd_left _ _,
have gcd_dvd_b : (gcd a b) ∣ b, from gcd_dvd_right _ _,
let b':= b/(gcd a b),
have bp_eq : b' = b/(gcd a b), by simp,
let d := gcd a b,
have d_eq : d = gcd a b, by simp,
have eq2 : (b / (gcd a b)) * gcd a b = b, from nat.div_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_b,
have eq_a : d*a' = a,
{
calc
d*a' = gcd a b * a' : by rw d_eq
... = gcd a b * (a / (gcd a b)) : by rw ap_eq
... = a / gcd a b * gcd a b : by rw nat.mul_comm
... = a : by rw nat.div_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_a
},
have eq_b : d*b' = b,
{
calc
d*b' = b : by rw [nat.mul_comm,d_eq, bp_eq, eq2]
},
have da'_dvd_n: d*a' ∣ n, from eq.subst (eq.symm eq_a) a_dvd_n,
have db'_dvd_n: d*b' ∣ n, from eq.subst (eq.symm eq_b) b_dvd_n,
have gcd_pos: gcd a b > 0, from gcd_pos_of_pos_left b ((nat.pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr h.left),
have middlestep: a' * gcd a b ∣ n / d * gcd a b,
{
rw mul_comm,
rw ← d_eq,
have d_dvd_n: d ∣ n, from dvd_of_mul_right_dvd da'_dvd_n,
rwa nat.div_mul_cancel d_dvd_n,
},
have a'_dvd_n_dvd_d: a' ∣ n/d, from dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right gcd_pos middlestep,
have middlestep2: b' * gcd a b ∣ n / d * gcd a b,
{
rw mul_comm,
rw ← d_eq,
have d_dvd_n: d ∣ n, from dvd_of_mul_right_dvd db'_dvd_n,
rwa nat.div_mul_cancel d_dvd_n,
},
have b'_dvd_n_dvd_d: b' ∣ n/d, from dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right gcd_pos middlestep2,
have capbp : coprime a' b',
{
have b_gr_0 : b > 0,
{
rw pos_iff_ne_zero,
exact h.right.left,
},
have gcd_gr_0 : gcd a b > 0, from nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right a b_gr_0,
have cop_fractions : coprime (a / gcd a b) (b /gcd a b), from nat.coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd gcd_gr_0,
have cop_fractions_2 : coprime a' (b / gcd a b), from eq.subst ap_eq cop_fractions,
exact eq.subst bp_eq cop_fractions_2,
},
have apbp_dvd_n_dvd_d: a'*b' ∣ n/d, from coprime_dvd_of_dvd_mul a'_dvd_n_dvd_d b'_dvd_n_dvd_d capbp,
have : a'*b'*d ∣ n,
{
have d_gr_zero : d > 0, from (eq.subst (eq.symm d_eq) gcd_pos),
rw ← nat.mul_div_cancel n d_gr_zero,
have : a' * b' * d ∣ (n / d) * d, from mul_dvd_mul_right apbp_dvd_n_dvd_d d,
have : a' * b' * d ∣ d * (n / d), from eq.subst (mul_comm (n / d) d) this,
have d_dvd_n: d ∣ n, from dvd_of_mul_right_dvd da'_dvd_n,
have : a' * b' * d ∣ d * n / d, from eq.subst (eq.symm (nat.mul_div_assoc d d_dvd_n)) this,
exact eq.subst (mul_comm d n) this,
},
have eq3 : a'*b'*d = m,
{
calc
a'*b'*d = (a/gcd a b) * ((b/gcd a b) * gcd a b) : by rw [mul_assoc,ap_eq, bp_eq, d_eq]
... = (a/gcd a b) * (gcd a b * (b/gcd a b)) : by rw nat.mul_comm (gcd a b) (b/gcd a b)
... = (a/gcd a b) * (gcd a b * b/gcd a b) : by rw ←nat.mul_div_assoc (gcd a b) gcd_dvd_b
... = (a/gcd a b) * (b * gcd a b /gcd a b) : by rw nat.mul_comm (gcd a b) b
... = (a/gcd a b) * b : by rw nat.mul_div_cancel b gcd_pos
... = b * (a / gcd a b) : by rw nat.mul_comm
... = b * a / gcd a b : by rw nat.mul_div_assoc b gcd_dvd_a
... = m : by rw [mul_comm,m_def]
},
rwa ←eq3,
},
{
intros y hn,
have m_lcm : m = lcm a b, by unfold lcm,
have y_lcm : y = lcm a b, from lcm_def y a b hn ,
exact by rw [m_lcm, y_lcm],
}
end
def int_lcm (i j : ℤ) : ℕ := int.nat_abs(i * j) / (int.gcd i j)
-- Show that the least common multiple of a and b is given by |ab|/(a,b)
theorem q4b : ∀ a b : ℤ, int_lcm a b = int.nat_abs (a*b) /(int.gcd a b) :=
begin
intros a b,
refl,
end
-- Let m and n be positive integers, and let K be the kernel of the map:
-- ℤ/mnℤ → ℤ/mℤ x ℤ/nℤ
-- that takes a class mod mn to the corresponding classes modulo m and n.
-- Show that K has (m, n) elements. What are they?
-- theorem q5 :
-- -- Show that the equation ax = b (mod n) has no solutions if b is not divisible by (a, n), and exactly (a, n) solutions in ℤ/n otherwise.
-- theorem q6 :
-- Show that the equation ax = b (mod n) has no solutions if b is not divisible by (a, n), and exactly (a, n) solutions in ℤ/n otherwise.
--theorem q6 : ¬(gcd a n ∣ b) → ¬(∃ x, a*x ≡ b [MOD n])
-- -- For n a positive integer, let σ(n) denote the sum Σ d for d∣n and d>0, of the positive divisors of n.
-- -- Show that the function n ↦ σ(n) is multiplicative.
-- theorem q7 :
-- Let p be a prime, and a be any integer. Show that a^(p²+p+1) is congruent to a^3 modulo p.
lemma nat.pow_mul (a b c : ℕ) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c :=
begin
induction c with c ih,
simp,
rw [nat.mul_succ, nat.pow_add, nat.pow_succ, ih],
end
lemma nat.pow.mul (a b p q: ℕ) : a ≡ b [MOD q] → a ^ p ≡ b ^ p [MOD q] :=
begin
intro h,
induction p with p ih,
simp,
rw [nat.pow_succ, nat.pow_succ],
apply nat.modeq.modeq_mul ih h,
end
theorem fermat_little_theorem : ∀ a p : ℕ, prime p → a ^ p ≡ a [MOD p] := sorry
theorem q8 : ∀ a p : ℕ, prime p → a^(p^2+p+1) ≡ a^3 [MOD p] :=
begin
assume a p hp,
rw [nat.pow_add, nat.pow_one, nat.pow_add, nat.pow_succ, nat.pow_one, nat.pow_succ, nat.pow_succ, nat.pow_one],
apply nat.modeq.modeq_mul,
apply nat.modeq.modeq_mul,
rw nat.pow_mul,
have middle_step : (a ^ p) ^ p ≡ a ^ p [MOD p],
let b := a ^ p,
exact fermat_little_theorem b p hp,
exact modeq.trans middle_step (fermat_little_theorem a p hp),
exact fermat_little_theorem a p hp,
exact modeq.refl a,
end
-- Let n be a squarefree positive integer, and suppose that for all primes p dividing n, we have (p-1)∣(n - 1).
-- Show that for all integers a with (a, n) = 1, we have a^n = a (mod n).
def square_free_int (n : ℕ) := ∀ p : ℕ, prime p ∧ (p ∣ n → ¬ (p^2 ∣ n))
theorem fermat_little_theorem_extension: ∀ a p : ℕ, prime p → a ^ (p-1) ≡ 1 [MOD p] := sorry
theorem q9 : ∀ n p a : ℕ , n ≠ 0 ∧ square_free_int n ∧ prime p ∧ p ∣ n → (p-1)∣(n - 1) → gcd a n = 1 → a^n ≡ a [MOD n] := sorry
--begin
--intros n p a,
--intro hn,
--intro hp,
--let l:= factors n,
--have n_gr_0: n > 0, from pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn.left,
--have p_in_list: p ∈ l, from mem_factors_of_dvd n_gr_0 hn.right.right.left hn.right.right.right,
--let d := l.count p,
--have d_eq_1: d=1, sorry
--end
lemma pos_of_square_free (n : ℕ) : square_free_int n → n > 0 :=
begin
intro H,
apply nat.pos_of_ne_zero,
intro Hn,
rw square_free_int at H,
rw Hn at H,
have h3 : ¬2 ^ 2 ∣ 0, from (H 2).right (dvd_zero 2),
norm_num at h3,
exact h3,
end
lemma list.div_prod_of_mem (l : list ℕ) (d : ℕ) (Hd : d ∈ l) : d ∣ list.prod l :=
begin
induction l with a m IH,
cases Hd,
rw list.prod_cons,
cases ((list.mem_cons_iff _ _ _).1 Hd) with H H,
rw H,
apply dvd_mul_right,
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (IH H) _,
end
lemma prod_list_count_2 (l : list ℕ) (d : ℕ) : list.count d l ≥ 2 → d * d ∣ list.prod l :=
begin
intro Hdl,
induction l with a m IH,
cases Hdl,
by_cases (d = a),
{ rw list.prod_cons,
rw h,
apply mul_dvd_mul (dvd_refl a),
apply list.div_prod_of_mem,
rw ←h,
rw ←list.count_pos,
apply nat.pos_of_ne_zero,
intro H0,
rw list.count_cons at Hdl,
rw if_pos h at Hdl,
rw H0 at Hdl,
revert Hdl,
exact dec_trivial
},
{ rw list.count_cons at Hdl,
rw if_neg h at Hdl,
have H := IH Hdl, rw list.prod_cons,
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right H _,
}
end
lemma nat.prime_mul (n : ℕ) (p : ℕ) (Hp : prime p) (Hs : square_free_int n) : p ∈ factors n → (factors n).count p = 1 :=
begin
intro Hpn,
have Hge1 : list.count p (factors n) ≥ 1,
exact list.count_pos.2 Hpn,
cases (le_iff_lt_or_eq.1 Hge1) with H2 H2,
{ exfalso,
/-
apply Hs p Hp,
{ rw ←(nat.prod_factors (pos_of_square_free n Hs)),
apply list.div_prod_of_mem,
assumption
},
show (1 * p) * p ∣ n,
rw one_mul,
rw ←(nat.prod_factors (pos_of_square_free n Hs)),
exact prod_list_count_2 (factors n) p H2,
-/
sorry,
},
exact H2.symm
end
-- Let n be a positive integer. Show that Σ Φ(d) for d∣n and d>0 = n.
-- [Hint: First show that the number of integers a with a ≤ 0 < n and (a, n) = n/d is equal to Φ(d).]
--theorem q10 :
end nat |
6dc63576bbca4dfea5a1c1704ff7a07005af9b85 | a7eef317ddec01b9fc6cfbb876fe7ac00f205ac7 | /src/category_theory/functor.lean | ce088df268f0e3306266a483b8b572f06f955a1c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kmill/mathlib | ea5a007b67ae4e9e18dd50d31d8aa60f650425ee | 1a419a9fea7b959317eddd556e1bb9639f4dcc05 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,578,197,719 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 276,482,939 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,593,637,960,000 | 1,593,637,959,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,189 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
Defines a functor between categories.
(As it is a 'bundled' object rather than the `is_functorial` typeclass parametrised
by the underlying function on objects, the name is capitalised.)
Introduces notations
`C ⥤ D` for the type of all functors from `C` to `D`.
(I would like a better arrow here, unfortunately ⇒ (`\functor`) is taken by core.)
-/
import category_theory.category
import tactic.reassoc_axiom
namespace category_theory
universes v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃ -- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
/--
`functor C D` represents a functor between categories `C` and `D`.
To apply a functor `F` to an object use `F.obj X`, and to a morphism use `F.map f`.
The axiom `map_id` expresses preservation of identities, and
`map_comp` expresses functoriality.
-/
structure functor (C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [category.{v₂} D] :
Type (max v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂) :=
(obj [] : C → D)
(map : Π {X Y : C}, (X ⟶ Y) → ((obj X) ⟶ (obj Y)))
(map_id' : ∀ (X : C), map (𝟙 X) = 𝟙 (obj X) . obviously)
(map_comp' : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z), map (f ≫ g) = (map f) ≫ (map g) . obviously)
-- A functor is basically a function, so give ⥤ a similar precedence to → (25).
-- For example, `C × D ⥤ E` should parse as `(C × D) ⥤ E` not `C × (D ⥤ E)`.
infixr ` ⥤ `:26 := functor -- type as \func --
restate_axiom functor.map_id'
attribute [simp] functor.map_id
restate_axiom functor.map_comp'
attribute [reassoc, simp] functor.map_comp
namespace functor
section
variables (C : Type u₁) [category.{v₁} C]
/-- `𝟭 C` is the identity functor on a category `C`. -/
protected def id : C ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ X, X,
map := λ _ _ f, f }
notation `𝟭` := functor.id
instance : inhabited (C ⥤ C) := ⟨functor.id C⟩
variable {C}
@[simp] lemma id_obj (X : C) : (𝟭 C).obj X = X := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (𝟭 C).map f = f := rfl
end
section
variables {C : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} C]
{D : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} D]
{E : Type u₃} [category.{v₃} E]
/--
`F ⋙ G` is the composition of a functor `F` and a functor `G` (`F` first, then `G`).
-/
def comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) : C ⥤ E :=
{ obj := λ X, G.obj (F.obj X),
map := λ _ _ f, G.map (F.map f) }
infixr ` ⋙ `:80 := comp
@[simp] lemma comp_obj (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) (X : C) : (F ⋙ G).obj X = G.obj (F.obj X) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_map (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F ⋙ G).map f = G.map (F.map f) := rfl
-- These are not simp lemmas because rewriting along equalities between functors
-- is not necessarily a good idea.
-- Natural isomorphisms are also provided in `whiskering.lean`.
protected lemma comp_id (F : C ⥤ D) : F ⋙ (𝟭 D) = F := by cases F; refl
protected lemma id_comp (F : C ⥤ D) : (𝟭 C) ⋙ F = F := by cases F; refl
end
end functor
end category_theory
|
d0065b9de18c294ff3e2f9651f1ed74bcb207448 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /tests/lean/run/387.lean | 00e2947a05ef0dc71717cca71c08327705d0554b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 566 | lean | --
axiom p {α β} : α → β → Prop
axiom foo {α β} (a : α) (b : β) : p a b
example : p 0 0 := by simp [foo]
example (a : Nat) : p a a := by simp [foo a]
example : p 0 0 := by simp [foo 0]
example : p 0 0 := by simp [foo 0 0]
example : p 0 0 := by
simp [foo 1] -- will not simplify
simp [foo 0]
example : p 0 0 ∧ p 1 1 := by
simp [foo 1]
traceState
simp [foo 0]
namespace Foo
axiom p {α} : α → Prop
axiom foo {α} [ToString α] (n : Nat) (a : α) : p a
example : p 0 := by simp [foo 0]
example : p 0 ∧ True := by simp [foo 0]
end Foo
|
e900649c242a2cec5fd5ce5b2920bc9038d4ca71 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/algebraic_geometry/Scheme.lean | e868920f05124148dc928a25fc6eb74aa4410753 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,432 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.algebraic_geometry.Spec
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u_1 l
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# The category of schemes
A scheme is a locally ringed space such that every point is contained in some open set
where there is an isomorphism of presheaves between the restriction to that open set,
and the structure sheaf of `Spec R`, for some commutative ring `R`.
A morphism is schemes is just a morphism of the underlying locally ringed spaces.
-/
namespace algebraic_geometry
/--
We define `Scheme` as a `X : LocallyRingedSpace`,
along with a proof that every point has an open neighbourhood `U`
so that that the restriction of `X` to `U` is isomorphic, as a space with a presheaf of commutative
rings, to `Spec.PresheafedSpace R` for some `R : CommRing`.
(Note we're not asking in the definition that this is an isomorphism as locally ringed spaces,
although that is a consequence.)
-/
structure Scheme
where
local_affine : ∀ (x : ↥(PresheafedSpace.carrier (SheafedSpace.to_PresheafedSpace (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace _X)))),
∃ (U :
topological_space.opens
↥(PresheafedSpace.carrier (SheafedSpace.to_PresheafedSpace (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace _X)))),
∃ (m : x ∈ U),
∃ (R : CommRing),
∃ (i :
PresheafedSpace.restrict (SheafedSpace.to_PresheafedSpace (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace _X))
(topological_space.opens.inclusion U) (topological_space.opens.inclusion_open_embedding U) ≅
Spec.PresheafedSpace R),
True
-- PROJECT
-- In fact, we can make the isomorphism `i` above an isomorphism in `LocallyRingedSpace`.
-- However this is a consequence of the above definition, and not necessary for defining schemes.
-- We haven't done this yet because we haven't shown that you can restrict a `LocallyRingedSpace`
-- along an open embedding.
-- We can do this already for `SheafedSpace` (as above), but we need to know that
-- the stalks of the restriction are still local rings, which we follow if we knew that
-- the stalks didn't change.
-- This will follow if we define cofinal functors, and show precomposing with a cofinal functor
-- doesn't change colimits, because open neighbourhoods of `x` within `U` are cofinal in
-- all open neighbourhoods of `x`.
namespace Scheme
/--
Every `Scheme` is a `LocallyRingedSpace`.
-/
-- (This parent projection is apparently not automatically generated because
-- we used the `extends X : LocallyRingedSpace` syntax.)
def to_LocallyRingedSpace (S : Scheme) : LocallyRingedSpace :=
LocallyRingedSpace.mk (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace (X S)) sorry
/--
`Spec R` as a `Scheme`.
-/
def Spec (R : CommRing) : Scheme :=
mk (LocallyRingedSpace.mk (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace (Spec.LocallyRingedSpace R)) sorry) sorry
/--
The empty scheme, as `Spec 0`.
-/
def empty : Scheme :=
Spec (CommRing.of PUnit)
protected instance has_emptyc : has_emptyc Scheme :=
has_emptyc.mk empty
protected instance inhabited : Inhabited Scheme :=
{ default := ∅ }
/--
Schemes are a full subcategory of locally ringed spaces.
-/
protected instance category_theory.category : category_theory.category Scheme :=
category_theory.induced_category.category to_LocallyRingedSpace
/--
The global sections, notated Gamma.
-/
def Γ : Schemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRing :=
category_theory.functor.op (category_theory.induced_functor to_LocallyRingedSpace) ⋙ LocallyRingedSpace.Γ
theorem Γ_def : Γ = category_theory.functor.op (category_theory.induced_functor to_LocallyRingedSpace) ⋙ LocallyRingedSpace.Γ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem Γ_obj (X : Schemeᵒᵖ) : category_theory.functor.obj Γ X =
category_theory.functor.obj
(PresheafedSpace.presheaf
(SheafedSpace.to_PresheafedSpace (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace (X (opposite.unop X)))))
(opposite.op ⊤) :=
rfl
theorem Γ_obj_op (X : Scheme) : category_theory.functor.obj Γ (opposite.op X) =
category_theory.functor.obj
(PresheafedSpace.presheaf (SheafedSpace.to_PresheafedSpace (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace (X X))))
(opposite.op ⊤) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem Γ_map {X : Schemeᵒᵖ} {Y : Schemeᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : category_theory.functor.map Γ f =
category_theory.nat_trans.app (PresheafedSpace.hom.c (subtype.val (category_theory.has_hom.hom.unop f)))
(opposite.op ⊤) ≫
category_theory.functor.map
(PresheafedSpace.presheaf
(SheafedSpace.to_PresheafedSpace (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace (X (opposite.unop Y)))))
(category_theory.has_hom.hom.op
(topological_space.opens.le_map_top
(PresheafedSpace.hom.base (subtype.val (category_theory.has_hom.hom.unop f))) ⊤)) :=
rfl
theorem Γ_map_op {X : Scheme} {Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) : category_theory.functor.map Γ (category_theory.has_hom.hom.op f) =
category_theory.nat_trans.app (PresheafedSpace.hom.c (subtype.val f)) (opposite.op ⊤) ≫
category_theory.functor.map
(PresheafedSpace.presheaf (SheafedSpace.to_PresheafedSpace (LocallyRingedSpace.to_SheafedSpace (X X))))
(category_theory.has_hom.hom.op (topological_space.opens.le_map_top (PresheafedSpace.hom.base (subtype.val f)) ⊤)) :=
rfl
|
2669869648c94dd21ca07c1bb93515077a924824 | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/data/list/dedup.lean | cbd44cd603d3917fffe66dde907d41fc1108859b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,688 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.list.nodup
/-!
# Erasure of duplicates in a list
This file proves basic results about `list.dedup` (definition in `data.list.defs`).
`dedup l` returns `l` without its duplicates. It keeps the earliest (that is, rightmost)
occurrence of each.
## Tags
duplicate, multiplicity, nodup, `nub`
-/
universes u
namespace list
variables {α : Type u} [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] theorem dedup_nil : dedup [] = ([] : list α) := rfl
theorem dedup_cons_of_mem' {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ dedup l) :
dedup (a :: l) = dedup l :=
pw_filter_cons_of_neg $ by simpa only [forall_mem_ne] using h
theorem dedup_cons_of_not_mem' {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ dedup l) :
dedup (a :: l) = a :: dedup l :=
pw_filter_cons_of_pos $ by simpa only [forall_mem_ne] using h
@[simp] theorem mem_dedup {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ dedup l ↔ a ∈ l :=
by simpa only [dedup, forall_mem_ne, not_not] using not_congr (@forall_mem_pw_filter α (≠) _
(λ x y z xz, not_and_distrib.1 $ mt (and.rec eq.trans) xz) a l)
@[simp] theorem dedup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∈ l) :
dedup (a :: l) = dedup l :=
dedup_cons_of_mem' $ mem_dedup.2 h
@[simp] theorem dedup_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : list α} (h : a ∉ l) :
dedup (a :: l) = a :: dedup l :=
dedup_cons_of_not_mem' $ mt mem_dedup.1 h
theorem dedup_sublist : ∀ (l : list α), dedup l <+ l := pw_filter_sublist
theorem dedup_subset : ∀ (l : list α), dedup l ⊆ l := pw_filter_subset
theorem subset_dedup (l : list α) : l ⊆ dedup l :=
λ a, mem_dedup.2
theorem nodup_dedup : ∀ l : list α, nodup (dedup l) := pairwise_pw_filter
theorem dedup_eq_self {l : list α} : dedup l = l ↔ nodup l := pw_filter_eq_self
protected lemma nodup.dedup {l : list α} (h : l.nodup) : l.dedup = l :=
list.dedup_eq_self.2 h
@[simp] theorem dedup_idempotent {l : list α} : dedup (dedup l) = dedup l :=
pw_filter_idempotent
theorem dedup_append (l₁ l₂ : list α) : dedup (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ∪ dedup l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁ with a l₁ IH, {refl}, rw [cons_union, ← IH],
show dedup (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) = insert a (dedup (l₁ ++ l₂)),
by_cases a ∈ dedup (l₁ ++ l₂);
[ rw [dedup_cons_of_mem' h, insert_of_mem h],
rw [dedup_cons_of_not_mem' h, insert_of_not_mem h]]
end
lemma repeat_dedup {x : α} : ∀ {k}, k ≠ 0 → (repeat x k).dedup = [x]
| 0 h := (h rfl).elim
| 1 _ := rfl
| (n+2) _ := by rw [repeat_succ, dedup_cons_of_mem (mem_repeat.2 ⟨n.succ_ne_zero, rfl⟩),
repeat_dedup n.succ_ne_zero]
end list
|
eaa9dd2e112e248feb1707013dc943324f05409d | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/ring_theory/local_properties.lean | 47bf634d18d70ceb4a4a783e03f1a73c66d5e84a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 30,333 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import ring_theory.finite_type
import ring_theory.localization.at_prime
import ring_theory.localization.away.basic
import ring_theory.localization.integer
import ring_theory.localization.submodule
import ring_theory.nilpotent
import ring_theory.ring_hom_properties
/-!
# Local properties of commutative rings
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file, we provide the proofs of various local properties.
## Naming Conventions
* `localization_P` : `P` holds for `S⁻¹R` if `P` holds for `R`.
* `P_of_localization_maximal` : `P` holds for `R` if `P` holds for `Rₘ` for all maximal `m`.
* `P_of_localization_prime` : `P` holds for `R` if `P` holds for `Rₘ` for all prime `m`.
* `P_of_localization_span` : `P` holds for `R` if given a spanning set `{fᵢ}`, `P` holds for all
`R_{fᵢ}`.
## Main results
The following properties are covered:
* The triviality of an ideal or an element:
`ideal_eq_bot_of_localization`, `eq_zero_of_localization`
* `is_reduced` : `localization_is_reduced`, `is_reduced_of_localization_maximal`.
* `finite`: `localization_finite`, `finite_of_localization_span`
* `finite_type`: `localization_finite_type`, `finite_type_of_localization_span`
-/
open_locale pointwise classical big_operators
universe u
variables {R S : Type u} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (M : submonoid R)
variables (N : submonoid S) (R' S' : Type u) [comm_ring R'] [comm_ring S'] (f : R →+* S)
variables [algebra R R'] [algebra S S']
section properties
section comm_ring
variable (P : ∀ (R : Type u) [comm_ring R], Prop)
include P
/-- A property `P` of comm rings is said to be preserved by localization
if `P` holds for `M⁻¹R` whenever `P` holds for `R`. -/
def localization_preserves : Prop :=
∀ {R : Type u} [hR : comm_ring R] (M : by exactI submonoid R) (S : Type u) [hS : comm_ring S]
[by exactI algebra R S] [by exactI is_localization M S], @P R hR → @P S hS
/-- A property `P` of comm rings satisfies `of_localization_maximal` if
if `P` holds for `R` whenever `P` holds for `Rₘ` for all maximal ideal `m`. -/
def of_localization_maximal : Prop :=
∀ (R : Type u) [comm_ring R],
by exactI (∀ (J : ideal R) (hJ : J.is_maximal), by exactI P (localization.at_prime J)) → P R
end comm_ring
section ring_hom
variable (P : ∀ {R S : Type u} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : by exactI R →+* S), Prop)
include P
/-- A property `P` of ring homs is said to be preserved by localization
if `P` holds for `M⁻¹R →+* M⁻¹S` whenever `P` holds for `R →+* S`. -/
def ring_hom.localization_preserves :=
∀ ⦃R S : Type u⦄ [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : by exactI R →+* S) (M : by exactI submonoid R)
(R' S' : Type u) [comm_ring R'] [comm_ring S'] [by exactI algebra R R']
[by exactI algebra S S'] [by exactI is_localization M R']
[by exactI is_localization (M.map f) S'],
by exactI (P f → P (is_localization.map S' f (submonoid.le_comap_map M) : R' →+* S'))
/-- A property `P` of ring homs satisfies `ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span`
if `P` holds for `R →+* S` whenever there exists a finite set `{ r }` that spans `R` such that
`P` holds for `Rᵣ →+* Sᵣ`.
Note that this is equivalent to `ring_hom.of_localization_span` via
`ring_hom.of_localization_span_iff_finite`, but this is easier to prove. -/
def ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span :=
∀ ⦃R S : Type u⦄ [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : by exactI R →+* S)
(s : finset R) (hs : by exactI ideal.span (s : set R) = ⊤)
(H : by exactI (∀ (r : s), P (localization.away_map f r))), by exactI P f
/-- A property `P` of ring homs satisfies `ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span`
if `P` holds for `R →+* S` whenever there exists a set `{ r }` that spans `R` such that
`P` holds for `Rᵣ →+* Sᵣ`.
Note that this is equivalent to `ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span` via
`ring_hom.of_localization_span_iff_finite`, but this has less restrictions when applying. -/
def ring_hom.of_localization_span :=
∀ ⦃R S : Type u⦄ [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : by exactI R →+* S)
(s : set R) (hs : by exactI ideal.span s = ⊤)
(H : by exactI (∀ (r : s), P (localization.away_map f r))), by exactI P f
/-- A property `P` of ring homs satisfies `ring_hom.holds_for_localization_away`
if `P` holds for each localization map `R →+* Rᵣ`. -/
def ring_hom.holds_for_localization_away : Prop :=
∀ ⦃R : Type u⦄ (S : Type u) [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] [by exactI algebra R S] (r : R)
[by exactI is_localization.away r S], by exactI P (algebra_map R S)
/-- A property `P` of ring homs satisfies `ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span_target`
if `P` holds for `R →+* S` whenever there exists a finite set `{ r }` that spans `S` such that
`P` holds for `R →+* Sᵣ`.
Note that this is equivalent to `ring_hom.of_localization_span_target` via
`ring_hom.of_localization_span_target_iff_finite`, but this is easier to prove. -/
def ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span_target : Prop :=
∀ ⦃R S : Type u⦄ [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : by exactI R →+* S)
(s : finset S) (hs : by exactI ideal.span (s : set S) = ⊤)
(H : by exactI (∀ (r : s), P ((algebra_map S (localization.away (r : S))).comp f))),
by exactI P f
/-- A property `P` of ring homs satisfies `ring_hom.of_localization_span_target`
if `P` holds for `R →+* S` whenever there exists a set `{ r }` that spans `S` such that
`P` holds for `R →+* Sᵣ`.
Note that this is equivalent to `ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span_target` via
`ring_hom.of_localization_span_target_iff_finite`, but this has less restrictions when applying. -/
def ring_hom.of_localization_span_target : Prop :=
∀ ⦃R S : Type u⦄ [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : by exactI R →+* S)
(s : set S) (hs : by exactI ideal.span s = ⊤)
(H : by exactI (∀ (r : s), P ((algebra_map S (localization.away (r : S))).comp f))),
by exactI P f
/-- A property `P` of ring homs satisfies `of_localization_prime` if
if `P` holds for `R` whenever `P` holds for `Rₘ` for all prime ideals `p`. -/
def ring_hom.of_localization_prime : Prop :=
∀ ⦃R S : Type u⦄ [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] (f : by exactI R →+* S),
by exactI (∀ (J : ideal S) (hJ : J.is_prime),
by exactI P (localization.local_ring_hom _ J f rfl)) → P f
/-- A property of ring homs is local if it is preserved by localizations and compositions, and for
each `{ r }` that spans `S`, we have `P (R →+* S) ↔ ∀ r, P (R →+* Sᵣ)`. -/
structure ring_hom.property_is_local : Prop :=
(localization_preserves : ring_hom.localization_preserves @P)
(of_localization_span_target : ring_hom.of_localization_span_target @P)
(stable_under_composition : ring_hom.stable_under_composition @P)
(holds_for_localization_away : ring_hom.holds_for_localization_away @P)
lemma ring_hom.of_localization_span_iff_finite :
ring_hom.of_localization_span @P ↔ ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span @P :=
begin
delta ring_hom.of_localization_span ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span,
apply forall₅_congr, -- TODO: Using `refine` here breaks `resetI`.
introsI,
split,
{ intros h s, exact h s },
{ intros h s hs hs',
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := (ideal.span_eq_top_iff_finite s).mp hs,
exact h s' h₂ (λ x, hs' ⟨_, h₁ x.prop⟩) }
end
lemma ring_hom.of_localization_span_target_iff_finite :
ring_hom.of_localization_span_target @P ↔ ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span_target @P :=
begin
delta ring_hom.of_localization_span_target ring_hom.of_localization_finite_span_target,
apply forall₅_congr, -- TODO: Using `refine` here breaks `resetI`.
introsI,
split,
{ intros h s, exact h s },
{ intros h s hs hs',
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := (ideal.span_eq_top_iff_finite s).mp hs,
exact h s' h₂ (λ x, hs' ⟨_, h₁ x.prop⟩) }
end
variables {P f R' S'}
lemma _root_.ring_hom.property_is_local.respects_iso (hP : ring_hom.property_is_local @P) :
ring_hom.respects_iso @P :=
begin
apply hP.stable_under_composition.respects_iso,
introv,
resetI,
letI := e.to_ring_hom.to_algebra,
apply_with hP.holds_for_localization_away { instances := ff },
apply is_localization.away_of_is_unit_of_bijective _ is_unit_one,
exact e.bijective
end
-- Almost all arguments are implicit since this is not intended to use mid-proof.
lemma ring_hom.localization_preserves.away
(H : ring_hom.localization_preserves @P) (r : R) [is_localization.away r R']
[is_localization.away (f r) S'] (hf : P f) :
P (by exactI is_localization.away.map R' S' f r) :=
begin
resetI,
haveI : is_localization ((submonoid.powers r).map f) S',
{ rw submonoid.map_powers, assumption },
exact H f (submonoid.powers r) R' S' hf,
end
lemma ring_hom.property_is_local.of_localization_span (hP : ring_hom.property_is_local @P) :
ring_hom.of_localization_span @P :=
begin
introv R hs hs',
resetI,
apply_fun (ideal.map f) at hs,
rw [ideal.map_span, ideal.map_top] at hs,
apply hP.of_localization_span_target _ _ hs,
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩,
have := hs' ⟨r, hr⟩,
convert hP.stable_under_composition _ _ (hP.holds_for_localization_away (localization.away r) r)
(hs' ⟨r, hr⟩) using 1,
exact (is_localization.map_comp _).symm
end
end ring_hom
end properties
section ideal
open_locale non_zero_divisors
/-- Let `I J : ideal R`. If the localization of `I` at each maximal ideal `P` is included in
the localization of `J` at `P`, then `I ≤ J`. -/
lemma ideal.le_of_localization_maximal {I J : ideal R}
(h : ∀ (P : ideal R) (hP : P.is_maximal),
ideal.map (algebra_map R (by exactI localization.at_prime P)) I ≤
ideal.map (algebra_map R (by exactI localization.at_prime P)) J) :
I ≤ J :=
begin
intros x hx,
suffices : J.colon (ideal.span {x}) = ⊤,
{ simpa using submodule.mem_colon.mp
(show (1 : R) ∈ J.colon (ideal.span {x}), from this.symm ▸ submodule.mem_top)
x (ideal.mem_span_singleton_self x) },
refine not.imp_symm (J.colon (ideal.span {x})).exists_le_maximal _,
push_neg,
introsI P hP le,
obtain ⟨⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩⟩, eq⟩ := (is_localization.mem_map_algebra_map_iff P.prime_compl _).mp
(h P hP (ideal.mem_map_of_mem _ hx)),
rw [← _root_.map_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub] at eq,
obtain ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, eq⟩ := (is_localization.map_eq_zero_iff P.prime_compl _ _).mp eq,
refine hs ((hP.is_prime.mem_or_mem (le (ideal.mem_colon_singleton.mpr _))).resolve_right hm),
simp only [subtype.coe_mk, mul_sub, sub_eq_zero, mul_comm x s, mul_left_comm] at eq,
simpa only [mul_assoc, eq] using J.mul_mem_left m ha
end
/-- Let `I J : ideal R`. If the localization of `I` at each maximal ideal `P` is equal to
the localization of `J` at `P`, then `I = J`. -/
theorem ideal.eq_of_localization_maximal {I J : ideal R}
(h : ∀ (P : ideal R) (hP : P.is_maximal),
ideal.map (algebra_map R (by exactI localization.at_prime P)) I =
ideal.map (algebra_map R (by exactI localization.at_prime P)) J) :
I = J :=
le_antisymm
(ideal.le_of_localization_maximal (λ P hP, (h P hP).le))
(ideal.le_of_localization_maximal (λ P hP, (h P hP).ge))
/-- An ideal is trivial if its localization at every maximal ideal is trivial. -/
lemma ideal_eq_bot_of_localization' (I : ideal R)
(h : ∀ (J : ideal R) (hJ : J.is_maximal),
ideal.map (algebra_map R (by exactI (localization.at_prime J))) I = ⊥) : I = ⊥ :=
ideal.eq_of_localization_maximal (λ P hP, (by simpa using h P hP))
-- TODO: This proof should work for all modules, once we have enough material on submodules of
-- localized modules.
/-- An ideal is trivial if its localization at every maximal ideal is trivial. -/
lemma ideal_eq_bot_of_localization (I : ideal R)
(h : ∀ (J : ideal R) (hJ : J.is_maximal),
by exactI is_localization.coe_submodule (localization.at_prime J) I = ⊥) : I = ⊥ :=
ideal_eq_bot_of_localization' _ (λ P hP, (ideal.map_eq_bot_iff_le_ker _).mpr (λ x hx,
by { rw [ring_hom.mem_ker, ← submodule.mem_bot R, ← h P hP, is_localization.mem_coe_submodule],
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ }))
lemma eq_zero_of_localization (r : R)
(h : ∀ (J : ideal R) (hJ : J.is_maximal),
by exactI algebra_map R (localization.at_prime J) r = 0) : r = 0 :=
begin
rw ← ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot,
apply ideal_eq_bot_of_localization,
intros J hJ,
delta is_localization.coe_submodule,
erw [submodule.map_span, submodule.span_eq_bot],
rintro _ ⟨_, h', rfl⟩,
cases set.mem_singleton_iff.mpr h',
exact h J hJ,
end
end ideal
section reduced
lemma localization_is_reduced : localization_preserves (λ R hR, by exactI is_reduced R) :=
begin
introv R _ _,
resetI,
constructor,
rintro x ⟨(_|n), e⟩,
{ simpa using congr_arg (*x) e },
obtain ⟨⟨y, m⟩, hx⟩ := is_localization.surj M x,
dsimp only at hx,
let hx' := congr_arg (^ n.succ) hx,
simp only [mul_pow, e, zero_mul, ← ring_hom.map_pow] at hx',
rw [← (algebra_map R S).map_zero] at hx',
obtain ⟨m', hm'⟩ := (is_localization.eq_iff_exists M S).mp hx',
apply_fun (*m'^n) at hm',
simp only [mul_assoc, zero_mul, mul_zero] at hm',
rw [← mul_left_comm, ← pow_succ, ← mul_pow] at hm',
replace hm' := is_nilpotent.eq_zero ⟨_, hm'.symm⟩,
rw [← (is_localization.map_units S m).mul_left_inj, hx, zero_mul,
is_localization.map_eq_zero_iff M],
exact ⟨m', by rw [← hm', mul_comm]⟩
end
instance [is_reduced R] : is_reduced (localization M) := localization_is_reduced M _ infer_instance
lemma is_reduced_of_localization_maximal :
of_localization_maximal (λ R hR, by exactI is_reduced R) :=
begin
introv R h,
constructor,
intros x hx,
apply eq_zero_of_localization,
intros J hJ,
specialize h J hJ,
resetI,
exact (hx.map $ algebra_map R $ localization.at_prime J).eq_zero,
end
end reduced
section surjective
lemma localization_preserves_surjective :
ring_hom.localization_preserves (λ R S _ _ f, function.surjective f) :=
begin
introv R H x,
resetI,
obtain ⟨x, ⟨_, s, hs, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := is_localization.mk'_surjective (M.map f) x,
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := H x,
use is_localization.mk' R' y ⟨s, hs⟩,
rw is_localization.map_mk',
refl,
end
lemma surjective_of_localization_span :
ring_hom.of_localization_span (λ R S _ _ f, function.surjective f) :=
begin
introv R e H,
rw [← set.range_iff_surjective, set.eq_univ_iff_forall],
resetI,
letI := f.to_algebra,
intro x,
apply submodule.mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (algebra.of_id R S).to_linear_map.range s e,
intro r,
obtain ⟨a, e'⟩ := H r (algebra_map _ _ x),
obtain ⟨b, ⟨_, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := is_localization.mk'_surjective (submonoid.powers (r : R)) a,
erw is_localization.map_mk' at e',
rw [eq_comm, is_localization.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, subtype.coe_mk, subtype.coe_mk, ← map_mul] at e',
obtain ⟨⟨_, n', rfl⟩, e''⟩ := (is_localization.eq_iff_exists (submonoid.powers (f r)) _).mp e',
rw [subtype.coe_mk, mul_comm x, ←mul_assoc, ← map_pow, ← map_mul, ← map_mul, ← pow_add] at e'',
exact ⟨n' + n, _, e''.symm⟩
end
end surjective
section finite
/-- If `S` is a finite `R`-algebra, then `S' = M⁻¹S` is a finite `R' = M⁻¹R`-algebra. -/
lemma localization_finite : ring_hom.localization_preserves @ring_hom.finite :=
begin
introv R hf,
-- Setting up the `algebra` and `is_scalar_tower` instances needed
resetI,
letI := f.to_algebra,
letI := ((algebra_map S S').comp f).to_algebra,
let f' : R' →+* S' := is_localization.map S' f (submonoid.le_comap_map M),
letI := f'.to_algebra,
haveI : is_scalar_tower R R' S' :=
is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq' (is_localization.map_comp _).symm,
let fₐ : S →ₐ[R] S' := alg_hom.mk' (algebra_map S S') (λ c x, ring_hom.map_mul _ _ _),
-- We claim that if `S` is generated by `T` as an `R`-module,
-- then `S'` is generated by `T` as an `R'`-module.
unfreezingI { obtain ⟨T, hT⟩ := hf },
use T.image (algebra_map S S'),
rw eq_top_iff,
rintro x -,
-- By the hypotheses, for each `x : S'`, we have `x = y / (f r)` for some `y : S` and `r : M`.
-- Since `S` is generated by `T`, the image of `y` should fall in the span of the image of `T`.
obtain ⟨y, ⟨_, ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩ := is_localization.mk'_surjective (M.map f) x,
rw [is_localization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, mul_comm, finset.coe_image],
have hy : y ∈ submodule.span R ↑T, by { rw hT, trivial },
replace hy : algebra_map S S' y ∈ submodule.map fₐ.to_linear_map (submodule.span R T) :=
submodule.mem_map_of_mem hy,
rw submodule.map_span fₐ.to_linear_map T at hy,
have H : submodule.span R ((algebra_map S S') '' T) ≤
(submodule.span R' ((algebra_map S S') '' T)).restrict_scalars R,
{ rw submodule.span_le, exact submodule.subset_span },
-- Now, since `y ∈ span T`, and `(f r)⁻¹ ∈ R'`, `x / (f r)` is in `span T` as well.
convert (submodule.span R' ((algebra_map S S') '' T)).smul_mem
(is_localization.mk' R' (1 : R) ⟨r, hr⟩) (H hy) using 1,
rw algebra.smul_def,
erw is_localization.map_mk',
rw map_one,
refl,
end
lemma localization_away_map_finite (r : R) [is_localization.away r R']
[is_localization.away (f r) S'] (hf : f.finite) :
(is_localization.away.map R' S' f r).finite :=
localization_finite.away r hf
/--
Let `S` be an `R`-algebra, `M` an submonoid of `R`, and `S' = M⁻¹S`.
If the image of some `x : S` falls in the span of some finite `s ⊆ S'` over `R`,
then there exists some `m : M` such that `m • x` falls in the
span of `finset_integer_multiple _ s` over `R`.
-/
lemma is_localization.smul_mem_finset_integer_multiple_span [algebra R S]
[algebra R S'] [is_scalar_tower R S S']
[is_localization (M.map (algebra_map R S)) S'] (x : S)
(s : finset S') (hx : algebra_map S S' x ∈ submodule.span R (s : set S')) :
∃ m : M, m • x ∈ submodule.span R
(is_localization.finset_integer_multiple (M.map (algebra_map R S)) s : set S) :=
begin
let g : S →ₐ[R] S' := alg_hom.mk' (algebra_map S S')
(λ c x, by simp [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one]),
-- We first obtain the `y' ∈ M` such that `s' = y' • s` is falls in the image of `S` in `S'`.
let y := is_localization.common_denom_of_finset (M.map (algebra_map R S)) s,
have hx₁ : (y : S) • ↑s = g '' _ := (is_localization.finset_integer_multiple_image _ s).symm,
obtain ⟨y', hy', e : algebra_map R S y' = y⟩ := y.prop,
have : algebra_map R S y' • (s : set S') = y' • s :=
by simp_rw [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul],
rw [← e, this] at hx₁,
replace hx₁ := congr_arg (submodule.span R) hx₁,
rw submodule.span_smul at hx₁,
replace hx : _ ∈ y' • submodule.span R (s : set S') := set.smul_mem_smul_set hx,
rw hx₁ at hx,
erw [← g.map_smul, ← submodule.map_span (g : S →ₗ[R] S')] at hx,
-- Since `x` falls in the span of `s` in `S'`, `y' • x : S` falls in the span of `s'` in `S'`.
-- That is, there exists some `x' : S` in the span of `s'` in `S` and `x' = y' • x` in `S'`.
-- Thus `a • (y' • x) = a • x' ∈ span s'` in `S` for some `a ∈ M`.
obtain ⟨x', hx', hx'' : algebra_map _ _ _ = _⟩ := hx,
obtain ⟨⟨_, a, ha₁, rfl⟩, ha₂⟩ := (is_localization.eq_iff_exists
(M.map (algebra_map R S)) S').mp hx'',
use (⟨a, ha₁⟩ : M) * (⟨y', hy'⟩ : M),
convert (submodule.span R (is_localization.finset_integer_multiple
(submonoid.map (algebra_map R S) M) s : set S)).smul_mem a hx' using 1,
convert ha₂.symm,
{ rw [subtype.coe_mk, submonoid.smul_def, submonoid.coe_mul, ← smul_smul],
exact algebra.smul_def _ _ },
{ exact algebra.smul_def _ _ }
end
/-- If `S` is an `R' = M⁻¹R` algebra, and `x ∈ span R' s`,
then `t • x ∈ span R s` for some `t : M`.-/
lemma multiple_mem_span_of_mem_localization_span [algebra R' S] [algebra R S]
[is_scalar_tower R R' S] [is_localization M R']
(s : set S) (x : S) (hx : x ∈ submodule.span R' s) :
∃ t : M, t • x ∈ submodule.span R s :=
begin
classical,
obtain ⟨s', hss', hs'⟩ := submodule.mem_span_finite_of_mem_span hx,
rsuffices ⟨t, ht⟩ : ∃ t : M, t • x ∈ submodule.span R (s' : set S),
{ exact ⟨t, submodule.span_mono hss' ht⟩ },
clear hx hss' s,
revert x,
apply s'.induction_on,
{ intros x hx, use 1, simpa using hx },
rintros a s ha hs x hx,
simp only [finset.coe_insert, finset.image_insert, finset.coe_image, subtype.coe_mk,
submodule.mem_span_insert] at hx ⊢,
rcases hx with ⟨y, z, hz, rfl⟩,
rcases is_localization.surj M y with ⟨⟨y', s'⟩, e⟩,
replace e : _ * a = _ * a := (congr_arg (λ x, algebra_map R' S x * a) e : _),
simp_rw [ring_hom.map_mul, ← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply, mul_comm (algebra_map R' S y),
mul_assoc, ← algebra.smul_def] at e,
rcases hs _ hz with ⟨t, ht⟩,
refine ⟨t*s', t*y', _, (submodule.span R (s : set S)).smul_mem s' ht, _⟩,
rw [smul_add, ← smul_smul, mul_comm, ← smul_smul, ← smul_smul, ← e],
refl,
end
/-- If `S` is an `R' = M⁻¹R` algebra, and `x ∈ adjoin R' s`,
then `t • x ∈ adjoin R s` for some `t : M`.-/
lemma multiple_mem_adjoin_of_mem_localization_adjoin [algebra R' S] [algebra R S]
[is_scalar_tower R R' S] [is_localization M R']
(s : set S) (x : S) (hx : x ∈ algebra.adjoin R' s) :
∃ t : M, t • x ∈ algebra.adjoin R s :=
begin
change ∃ (t : M), t • x ∈ (algebra.adjoin R s).to_submodule,
change x ∈ (algebra.adjoin R' s).to_submodule at hx,
simp_rw [algebra.adjoin_eq_span] at hx ⊢,
exact multiple_mem_span_of_mem_localization_span M R' _ _ hx
end
lemma finite_of_localization_span : ring_hom.of_localization_span @ring_hom.finite :=
begin
rw ring_hom.of_localization_span_iff_finite,
introv R hs H,
-- We first setup the instances
resetI,
letI := f.to_algebra,
letI := λ (r : s), (localization.away_map f r).to_algebra,
haveI : ∀ r : s, is_localization ((submonoid.powers (r : R)).map (algebra_map R S))
(localization.away (f r)),
{ intro r, rw submonoid.map_powers, exact localization.is_localization },
haveI : ∀ r : s, is_scalar_tower R (localization.away (r : R)) (localization.away (f r)) :=
λ r, is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq' (is_localization.map_comp _).symm,
-- By the hypothesis, we may find a finite generating set for each `Sᵣ`. This set can then be
-- lifted into `R` by multiplying a sufficiently large power of `r`. I claim that the union of
-- these generates `S`.
constructor,
replace H := λ r, (H r).1,
choose s₁ s₂ using H,
let sf := λ (x : s), is_localization.finset_integer_multiple (submonoid.powers (f x)) (s₁ x),
use s.attach.bUnion sf,
rw [submodule.span_attach_bUnion, eq_top_iff],
-- It suffices to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ span T` for each `r : s`, since `{ r ^ n }` spans `R`.
-- This then follows from the fact that each `x : R` is a linear combination of the generating set
-- of `Sᵣ`. By multiplying a sufficiently large power of `r`, we can cancel out the `r`s in the
-- denominators of both the generating set and the coefficients.
rintro x -,
apply submodule.mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem _ (s : set R) hs _ _,
intro r,
obtain ⟨⟨_, n₁, rfl⟩, hn₁⟩ := multiple_mem_span_of_mem_localization_span
(submonoid.powers (r : R)) (localization.away (r : R)) (s₁ r : set (localization.away (f r)))
(algebra_map S _ x) (by { rw s₂ r, trivial }),
rw [submonoid.smul_def, algebra.smul_def, is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply R S,
subtype.coe_mk, ← map_mul] at hn₁,
obtain ⟨⟨_, n₂, rfl⟩, hn₂⟩ := is_localization.smul_mem_finset_integer_multiple_span
(submonoid.powers (r : R)) (localization.away (f r)) _ (s₁ r) hn₁,
rw [submonoid.smul_def, ← algebra.smul_def, smul_smul, subtype.coe_mk, ← pow_add] at hn₂,
simp_rw submonoid.map_powers at hn₂,
use n₂ + n₁,
exact le_supr (λ (x : s), submodule.span R (sf x : set S)) r hn₂,
end
end finite
section finite_type
lemma localization_finite_type : ring_hom.localization_preserves @ring_hom.finite_type :=
begin
introv R hf,
-- mirrors the proof of `localization_map_finite`
resetI,
letI := f.to_algebra,
letI := ((algebra_map S S').comp f).to_algebra,
let f' : R' →+* S' := is_localization.map S' f (submonoid.le_comap_map M),
letI := f'.to_algebra,
haveI : is_scalar_tower R R' S' :=
is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq' (is_localization.map_comp _).symm,
let fₐ : S →ₐ[R] S' := alg_hom.mk' (algebra_map S S') (λ c x, ring_hom.map_mul _ _ _),
obtain ⟨T, hT⟩ := id hf,
use T.image (algebra_map S S'),
rw eq_top_iff,
rintro x -,
obtain ⟨y, ⟨_, ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩ := is_localization.mk'_surjective (M.map f) x,
rw [is_localization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, mul_comm, finset.coe_image],
have hy : y ∈ algebra.adjoin R (T : set S), by { rw hT, trivial },
replace hy : algebra_map S S' y ∈ (algebra.adjoin R (T : set S)).map fₐ :=
subalgebra.mem_map.mpr ⟨_, hy, rfl⟩,
rw fₐ.map_adjoin T at hy,
have H : algebra.adjoin R ((algebra_map S S') '' T) ≤
(algebra.adjoin R' ((algebra_map S S') '' T)).restrict_scalars R,
{ rw algebra.adjoin_le_iff, exact algebra.subset_adjoin },
convert (algebra.adjoin R' ((algebra_map S S') '' T)).smul_mem (H hy)
(is_localization.mk' R' (1 : R) ⟨r, hr⟩) using 1,
rw algebra.smul_def,
erw is_localization.map_mk',
rw map_one,
refl,
end
lemma localization_away_map_finite_type (r : R) [is_localization.away r R']
[is_localization.away (f r) S'] (hf : f.finite_type) :
(is_localization.away.map R' S' f r).finite_type :=
localization_finite_type.away r hf
variable {S'}
/--
Let `S` be an `R`-algebra, `M` a submonoid of `S`, `S' = M⁻¹S`.
Suppose the image of some `x : S` falls in the adjoin of some finite `s ⊆ S'` over `R`,
and `A` is an `R`-subalgebra of `S` containing both `M` and the numerators of `s`.
Then, there exists some `m : M` such that `m • x` falls in `A`.
-/
lemma is_localization.exists_smul_mem_of_mem_adjoin [algebra R S]
[algebra R S'] [is_scalar_tower R S S'] (M : submonoid S)
[is_localization M S'] (x : S) (s : finset S') (A : subalgebra R S)
(hA₁ : (is_localization.finset_integer_multiple M s : set S) ⊆ A)
(hA₂ : M ≤ A.to_submonoid)
(hx : algebra_map S S' x ∈ algebra.adjoin R (s : set S')) :
∃ m : M, m • x ∈ A :=
begin
let g : S →ₐ[R] S' := is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom R S S',
let y := is_localization.common_denom_of_finset M s,
have hx₁ : (y : S) • ↑s = g '' _ := (is_localization.finset_integer_multiple_image _ s).symm,
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := algebra.pow_smul_mem_of_smul_subset_of_mem_adjoin (y : S) (s : set S')
(A.map g) (by { rw hx₁, exact set.image_subset _ hA₁ }) hx (set.mem_image_of_mem _ (hA₂ y.2)),
obtain ⟨x', hx', hx''⟩ := hn n (le_of_eq rfl),
rw [algebra.smul_def, ← _root_.map_mul] at hx'',
obtain ⟨a, ha₂⟩ := (is_localization.eq_iff_exists M S').mp hx'',
use a * y ^ n,
convert A.mul_mem hx' (hA₂ a.prop),
rw [submonoid.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, submonoid.coe_mul, submonoid.coe_pow, mul_assoc, ←ha₂,
mul_comm],
end
/--
Let `S` be an `R`-algebra, `M` an submonoid of `R`, and `S' = M⁻¹S`.
If the image of some `x : S` falls in the adjoin of some finite `s ⊆ S'` over `R`,
then there exists some `m : M` such that `m • x` falls in the
adjoin of `finset_integer_multiple _ s` over `R`.
-/
lemma is_localization.lift_mem_adjoin_finset_integer_multiple [algebra R S]
[algebra R S'] [is_scalar_tower R S S']
[is_localization (M.map (algebra_map R S)) S'] (x : S)
(s : finset S') (hx : algebra_map S S' x ∈ algebra.adjoin R (s : set S')) :
∃ m : M, m • x ∈ algebra.adjoin R
(is_localization.finset_integer_multiple (M.map (algebra_map R S)) s : set S) :=
begin
obtain ⟨⟨_, a, ha, rfl⟩, e⟩ := is_localization.exists_smul_mem_of_mem_adjoin
(M.map (algebra_map R S)) x s (algebra.adjoin R _) algebra.subset_adjoin _ hx,
{ exact ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, by simpa [submonoid.smul_def] using e⟩ },
{ rintros _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩, exact subalgebra.algebra_map_mem _ a }
end
lemma finite_type_of_localization_span : ring_hom.of_localization_span @ring_hom.finite_type :=
begin
rw ring_hom.of_localization_span_iff_finite,
introv R hs H,
-- mirrors the proof of `finite_of_localization_span`
resetI,
letI := f.to_algebra,
letI := λ (r : s), (localization.away_map f r).to_algebra,
haveI : ∀ r : s, is_localization ((submonoid.powers (r : R)).map (algebra_map R S))
(localization.away (f r)),
{ intro r, rw submonoid.map_powers, exact localization.is_localization },
haveI : ∀ r : s, is_scalar_tower R (localization.away (r : R)) (localization.away (f r)) :=
λ r, is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq' (is_localization.map_comp _).symm,
constructor,
replace H := λ r, (H r).1,
choose s₁ s₂ using H,
let sf := λ (x : s), is_localization.finset_integer_multiple (submonoid.powers (f x)) (s₁ x),
use s.attach.bUnion sf,
convert (algebra.adjoin_attach_bUnion sf).trans _,
rw eq_top_iff,
rintro x -,
apply (⨆ (x : s), algebra.adjoin R (sf x : set S)).to_submodule
.mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem _ hs _ _,
intro r,
obtain ⟨⟨_, n₁, rfl⟩, hn₁⟩ := multiple_mem_adjoin_of_mem_localization_adjoin
(submonoid.powers (r : R)) (localization.away (r : R)) (s₁ r : set (localization.away (f r)))
(algebra_map S (localization.away (f r)) x) (by { rw s₂ r, trivial }),
rw [submonoid.smul_def, algebra.smul_def, is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply R S,
subtype.coe_mk, ← map_mul] at hn₁,
obtain ⟨⟨_, n₂, rfl⟩, hn₂⟩ := is_localization.lift_mem_adjoin_finset_integer_multiple
(submonoid.powers (r : R)) _ (s₁ r) hn₁,
rw [submonoid.smul_def, ← algebra.smul_def, smul_smul, subtype.coe_mk, ← pow_add] at hn₂,
simp_rw submonoid.map_powers at hn₂,
use n₂ + n₁,
exact le_supr (λ (x : s), algebra.adjoin R (sf x : set S)) r hn₂
end
end finite_type
|
17911f6f24e09d19d2b1b72cf31f91fd679a3bef | 4950bf76e5ae40ba9f8491647d0b6f228ddce173 | /src/ring_theory/algebra_tower.lean | acf076296a818e40c2cd31d4289733ec99d11ba5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ntzwq/mathlib | ca50b21079b0a7c6781c34b62199a396dd00cee2 | 36eec1a98f22df82eaccd354a758ef8576af2a7f | refs/heads/master | 1,675,193,391,478 | 1,607,822,996,000 | 1,607,822,996,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,011 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.invertible
import ring_theory.adjoin
import linear_algebra.basis
import algebra.algebra.basic
/-!
# Towers of algebras
We set up the basic theory of algebra towers.
An algebra tower A/S/R is expressed by having instances of `algebra A S`,
`algebra R S`, `algebra R A` and `is_scalar_tower R S A`, the later asserting the
compatibility condition `(r • s) • a = r • (s • a)`.
In `field_theory/tower.lean` we use this to prove the tower law for finite extensions,
that if `R` and `S` are both fields, then `[A:R] = [A:S] [S:A]`.
In this file we prepare the main lemma:
if `{bi | i ∈ I}` is an `R`-basis of `S` and `{cj | j ∈ J}` is a `S`-basis
of `A`, then `{bi cj | i ∈ I, j ∈ J}` is an `R`-basis of `A`. This statement does not require the
base rings to be a field, so we also generalize the lemma to rings in this file.
-/
universes u v w u₁
variables (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) (B : Type u₁)
namespace is_scalar_tower
section semimodule
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring S] [add_comm_monoid A] [add_comm_monoid B]
variables [algebra R S] [semimodule S A] [semimodule R A] [semimodule S B] [semimodule R B]
variables [is_scalar_tower R S A] [is_scalar_tower R S B]
variables {R} (S) {A}
theorem algebra_map_smul (r : R) (x : A) : algebra_map R S r • x = r • x :=
by rw [algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
variables {R S A}
theorem smul_left_comm (r : R) (s : S) (x : A) : r • s • x = s • r • x :=
by rw [← smul_assoc, algebra.smul_def r s, algebra.commutes, mul_smul, algebra_map_smul]
end semimodule
section semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [semiring A] [semiring B]
variables [algebra R S] [algebra S A] [algebra S B]
variables {R S A}
theorem of_algebra_map_eq [algebra R A]
(h : ∀ x, algebra_map R A x = algebra_map S A (algebra_map R S x)) :
is_scalar_tower R S A :=
⟨λ x y z, by simp_rw [algebra.smul_def, ring_hom.map_mul, mul_assoc, h]⟩
variables (R S A)
instance subalgebra (S₀ : subalgebra R S) : is_scalar_tower S₀ S A :=
of_algebra_map_eq $ λ x, rfl
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
variables [is_scalar_tower R S A] [is_scalar_tower R S B]
theorem algebra_map_eq :
algebra_map R A = (algebra_map S A).comp (algebra_map R S) :=
ring_hom.ext $ λ x, by simp_rw [ring_hom.comp_apply, algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one,
smul_assoc, one_smul]
theorem algebra_map_apply (x : R) : algebra_map R A x = algebra_map S A (algebra_map R S x) :=
by rw [algebra_map_eq R S A, ring_hom.comp_apply]
instance subalgebra' (S₀ : subalgebra R S) : is_scalar_tower R S₀ A :=
@is_scalar_tower.of_algebra_map_eq R S₀ A _ _ _ _ _ _ $ λ _,
(is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply R S A _ : _)
@[ext] lemma algebra.ext {S : Type u} {A : Type v} [comm_semiring S] [semiring A]
(h1 h2 : algebra S A) (h : ∀ {r : S} {x : A}, (by haveI := h1; exact r • x) = r • x) : h1 = h2 :=
begin
unfreezingI { cases h1 with f1 g1 h11 h12, cases h2 with f2 g2 h21 h22,
cases f1, cases f2, congr', { ext r x, exact h },
ext r, erw [← mul_one (g1 r), ← h12, ← mul_one (g2 r), ← h22, h], refl }
end
variables (R S A)
theorem algebra_comap_eq : algebra.comap.algebra R S A = ‹_› :=
algebra.ext _ _ $ λ x (z : A),
calc algebra_map R S x • z
= (x • 1 : S) • z : by rw algebra.algebra_map_eq_smul_one
... = x • (1 : S) • z : by rw smul_assoc
... = (by exact x • z : A) : by rw one_smul
/-- In a tower, the canonical map from the middle element to the top element is an
algebra homomorphism over the bottom element. -/
def to_alg_hom : S →ₐ[R] A :=
{ commutes' := λ _, (algebra_map_apply _ _ _ _).symm,
.. algebra_map S A }
@[simp] lemma to_alg_hom_apply (y : S) : to_alg_hom R S A y = algebra_map S A y := rfl
variables (R) {S A B}
/-- R ⟶ S induces S-Alg ⥤ R-Alg -/
def restrict_base (f : A →ₐ[S] B) : A →ₐ[R] B :=
{ commutes' := λ r, by { rw [algebra_map_apply R S A, algebra_map_apply R S B],
exact f.commutes (algebra_map R S r) },
.. (f : A →+* B) }
@[simp] lemma restrict_base_apply (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (x : A) : restrict_base R f x = f x := rfl
instance right : is_scalar_tower R A A :=
⟨λ x y z, by simp only [algebra.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]⟩
instance comap {R S A : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [semiring A]
[algebra R S] [algebra S A] : is_scalar_tower R S (algebra.comap R S A) :=
of_algebra_map_eq $ λ x, rfl
-- conflicts with is_scalar_tower.subalgebra
@[priority 999] instance subsemiring (U : subsemiring S) : is_scalar_tower U S A :=
of_algebra_map_eq $ λ x, rfl
section
local attribute [instance] algebra.of_is_subring subset.comm_ring
-- conflicts with is_scalar_tower.subalgebra
@[priority 999] instance subring {S A : Type*} [comm_ring S] [ring A] [algebra S A]
(U : set S) [is_subring U] : is_scalar_tower U S A :=
of_algebra_map_eq $ λ x, rfl
end
@[nolint instance_priority]
instance of_ring_hom {R A B : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A] [comm_semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] (f : A →ₐ[R] B) :
@is_scalar_tower R A B _ (f.to_ring_hom.to_algebra.to_has_scalar) _ :=
by { letI := (f : A →+* B).to_algebra, exact of_algebra_map_eq (λ x, (f.commutes x).symm) }
instance polynomial : is_scalar_tower R S (polynomial A) :=
of_algebra_map_eq $ λ x, congr_arg polynomial.C $ algebra_map_apply R S A x
variables (R S A)
theorem aeval_apply (x : A) (p : polynomial R) : polynomial.aeval x p =
polynomial.aeval x (polynomial.map (algebra_map R S) p) :=
by rw [polynomial.aeval_def, polynomial.aeval_def, polynomial.eval₂_map, algebra_map_eq R S A]
/-- Suppose that `R -> S -> A` is a tower of algebras.
If an element `r : R` is invertible in `S`, then it is invertible in `A`. -/
def invertible.algebra_tower (r : R) [invertible (algebra_map R S r)] :
invertible (algebra_map R A r) :=
invertible.copy (invertible.map (algebra_map S A : S →* A) (algebra_map R S r)) (algebra_map R A r)
(by rw [ring_hom.coe_monoid_hom, is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_apply R S A])
/-- A natural number that is invertible when coerced to `R` is also invertible
when coerced to any `R`-algebra. -/
def invertible_algebra_coe_nat (n : ℕ) [inv : invertible (n : R)] :
invertible (n : A) :=
by { haveI : invertible (algebra_map ℕ R n) := inv, exact invertible.algebra_tower ℕ R A n }
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A] [comm_semiring B]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra A B] [algebra R B] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
lemma algebra_map_aeval (x : A) (p : polynomial R) :
algebra_map A B (polynomial.aeval x p) = polynomial.aeval (algebra_map A B x) p :=
by rw [polynomial.aeval_def, polynomial.aeval_def, polynomial.hom_eval₂,
←is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_eq]
lemma aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_algebra_map_eq_zero {x : A} {p : polynomial R}
(h : function.injective (algebra_map A B)) (hp : polynomial.aeval (algebra_map A B x) p = 0) :
polynomial.aeval x p = 0 :=
begin
rw [← algebra_map_aeval, ← (algebra_map A B).map_zero] at hp,
exact h hp,
end
lemma aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_algebra_map_eq_zero_field {R A B : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [field A]
[comm_semiring B] [nontrivial B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B] [algebra A B] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
{x : A} {p : polynomial R} (h : polynomial.aeval (algebra_map A B x) p = 0) :
polynomial.aeval x p = 0 :=
aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_algebra_map_eq_zero R A B (algebra_map A B).injective h
instance linear_map (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (V : Type w)
[comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A] [add_comm_monoid V]
[semimodule R V] [algebra R A] : is_scalar_tower R A (V →ₗ[R] A) :=
⟨λ x y f, linear_map.ext $ λ v, algebra.smul_mul_assoc x y (f v)⟩
end comm_semiring
section division_ring
variables [field R] [division_ring S] [algebra R S] [char_zero R] [char_zero S]
instance rat : is_scalar_tower ℚ R S :=
of_algebra_map_eq $ λ x, ((algebra_map R S).map_rat_cast x).symm
end division_ring
end is_scalar_tower
namespace algebra
theorem adjoin_algebra_map' {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {A : Type w}
[comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] [comm_ring A] [algebra R S] [algebra S A] (s : set S) :
adjoin R (algebra_map S (comap R S A) '' s) = subalgebra.map (adjoin R s) (to_comap R S A) :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le $ set.image_subset_iff.2 $ λ y hy, ⟨y, subset_adjoin hy, rfl⟩)
(subalgebra.map_le.2 $ adjoin_le $ λ y hy, subset_adjoin ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)
theorem adjoin_algebra_map (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w)
[comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] [comm_ring A] [algebra R S] [algebra S A] [algebra R A]
[is_scalar_tower R S A] (s : set S) :
adjoin R (algebra_map S A '' s) = subalgebra.map (adjoin R s) (is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom R S A) :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le $ set.image_subset_iff.2 $ λ y hy, ⟨y, subset_adjoin hy, rfl⟩)
(subalgebra.map_le.2 $ adjoin_le $ λ y hy, subset_adjoin ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)
end algebra
namespace subalgebra
open is_scalar_tower
section semiring
variables (R) {S A} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [semiring A]
variables [algebra R S] [algebra S A] [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R S A]
/-- If A/S/R is a tower of algebras then the `res`triction of a S-subalgebra of A is an R-subalgebra of A. -/
def res (U : subalgebra S A) : subalgebra R A :=
{ algebra_map_mem' := λ x, by { rw algebra_map_apply R S A, exact U.algebra_map_mem _ },
.. U }
@[simp] lemma res_top : res R (⊤ : subalgebra S A) = ⊤ :=
algebra.eq_top_iff.2 $ λ _, show _ ∈ (⊤ : subalgebra S A), from algebra.mem_top
@[simp] lemma mem_res {U : subalgebra S A} {x : A} : x ∈ res R U ↔ x ∈ U := iff.rfl
lemma res_inj {U V : subalgebra S A} (H : res R U = res R V) : U = V :=
ext $ λ x, by rw [← mem_res R, H, mem_res]
/-- Produces a map from `subalgebra.under`. -/
def of_under {R A B : Type*} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A] [semiring B]
[algebra R A] [algebra R B] (S : subalgebra R A) (U : subalgebra S A)
[algebra S B] [is_scalar_tower R S B] (f : U →ₐ[S] B) : S.under U →ₐ[R] B :=
{ commutes' := λ r, (f.commutes (algebra_map R S r)).trans (algebra_map_apply R S B r).symm,
.. f }
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables (R) {S A} [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [comm_semiring A]
variables [algebra R S] [algebra S A] [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R S A]
@[simp] lemma aeval_coe {S : subalgebra R A} {x : S} {p : polynomial R} :
polynomial.aeval (x : A) p = polynomial.aeval x p :=
(algebra_map_aeval R S A x p).symm
end comm_semiring
end subalgebra
namespace is_scalar_tower
open subalgebra
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S] [comm_semiring A]
variables [algebra R S] [algebra S A] [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R S A]
theorem range_under_adjoin (t : set A) :
(to_alg_hom R S A).range.under (algebra.adjoin _ t) = res R (algebra.adjoin S t) :=
subalgebra.ext $ λ z,
show z ∈ subsemiring.closure (set.range (algebra_map (to_alg_hom R S A).range A) ∪ t : set A) ↔
z ∈ subsemiring.closure (set.range (algebra_map S A) ∪ t : set A),
from suffices set.range (algebra_map (to_alg_hom R S A).range A) = set.range (algebra_map S A),
by rw this,
by { ext z, exact ⟨λ ⟨⟨x, y, _, h1⟩, h2⟩, ⟨y, h2 ▸ h1⟩, λ ⟨y, hy⟩, ⟨⟨z, y, set.mem_univ _, hy⟩, rfl⟩⟩ }
end is_scalar_tower
section
open_locale classical
lemma algebra.fg_trans' {R S A : Type*} [comm_ring R] [comm_ring S] [comm_ring A]
[algebra R S] [algebra S A] [algebra R A] [is_scalar_tower R S A]
(hRS : (⊤ : subalgebra R S).fg) (hSA : (⊤ : subalgebra S A).fg) :
(⊤ : subalgebra R A).fg :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hRS, ⟨t, ht⟩ := hSA in ⟨s.image (algebra_map S A) ∪ t,
by rw [finset.coe_union, finset.coe_image, algebra.adjoin_union, algebra.adjoin_algebra_map, hs,
algebra.map_top, is_scalar_tower.range_under_adjoin, ht, subalgebra.res_top]⟩
end
section semiring
variables {R S A}
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring S] [add_comm_monoid A]
variables [algebra R S] [semimodule S A] [semimodule R A] [is_scalar_tower R S A]
namespace submodule
open is_scalar_tower
theorem smul_mem_span_smul_of_mem {s : set S} {t : set A} {k : S} (hks : k ∈ span R s)
{x : A} (hx : x ∈ t) : k • x ∈ span R (s • t) :=
span_induction hks (λ c hc, subset_span $ set.mem_smul.2 ⟨c, x, hc, hx, rfl⟩)
(by { rw zero_smul, exact zero_mem _ })
(λ c₁ c₂ ih₁ ih₂, by { rw add_smul, exact add_mem _ ih₁ ih₂ })
(λ b c hc, by { rw is_scalar_tower.smul_assoc, exact smul_mem _ _ hc })
theorem smul_mem_span_smul {s : set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) {t : set A} {k : S}
{x : A} (hx : x ∈ span R t) :
k • x ∈ span R (s • t) :=
span_induction hx (λ x hx, smul_mem_span_smul_of_mem (hs.symm ▸ mem_top) hx)
(by { rw smul_zero, exact zero_mem _ })
(λ x y ihx ihy, by { rw smul_add, exact add_mem _ ihx ihy })
(λ c x hx, smul_left_comm c k x ▸ smul_mem _ _ hx)
theorem smul_mem_span_smul' {s : set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) {t : set A} {k : S}
{x : A} (hx : x ∈ span R (s • t)) :
k • x ∈ span R (s • t) :=
span_induction hx (λ x hx, let ⟨p, q, hp, hq, hpq⟩ := set.mem_smul.1 hx in
by { rw [← hpq, smul_smul], exact smul_mem_span_smul_of_mem (hs.symm ▸ mem_top) hq })
(by { rw smul_zero, exact zero_mem _ })
(λ x y ihx ihy, by { rw smul_add, exact add_mem _ ihx ihy })
(λ c x hx, smul_left_comm c k x ▸ smul_mem _ _ hx)
theorem span_smul {s : set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) (t : set A) :
span R (s • t) = (span S t).restrict_scalars R :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 $ λ x hx, let ⟨p, q, hps, hqt, hpqx⟩ := set.mem_smul.1 hx in
hpqx ▸ (span S t).smul_mem p (subset_span hqt)) $
λ p hp, span_induction hp (λ x hx, one_smul S x ▸ smul_mem_span_smul hs (subset_span hx))
(zero_mem _)
(λ _ _, add_mem _)
(λ k x hx, smul_mem_span_smul' hs hx)
end submodule
end semiring
section ring
open finsupp
open_locale big_operators classical
universes v₁ w₁
variables {R S A}
variables [comm_ring R] [ring S] [add_comm_group A]
variables [algebra R S] [module S A] [module R A] [is_scalar_tower R S A]
theorem linear_independent_smul {ι : Type v₁} {b : ι → S} {ι' : Type w₁} {c : ι' → A}
(hb : linear_independent R b) (hc : linear_independent S c) :
linear_independent R (λ p : ι × ι', b p.1 • c p.2) :=
begin
rw linear_independent_iff' at hb hc, rw linear_independent_iff'', rintros s g hg hsg ⟨i, k⟩,
by_cases hik : (i, k) ∈ s,
{ have h1 : ∑ i in (s.image prod.fst).product (s.image prod.snd), g i • b i.1 • c i.2 = 0,
{ rw ← hsg, exact (finset.sum_subset finset.subset_product $ λ p _ hp,
show g p • b p.1 • c p.2 = 0, by rw [hg p hp, zero_smul]).symm },
rw [finset.sum_product, finset.sum_comm] at h1,
simp_rw [← smul_assoc, ← finset.sum_smul] at h1,
exact hb _ _ (hc _ _ h1 k (finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hik)) i (finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hik) },
exact hg _ hik
end
theorem is_basis.smul {ι : Type v₁} {b : ι → S} {ι' : Type w₁} {c : ι' → A}
(hb : is_basis R b) (hc : is_basis S c) : is_basis R (λ p : ι × ι', b p.1 • c p.2) :=
⟨linear_independent_smul hb.1 hc.1,
by rw [← set.range_smul_range, submodule.span_smul hb.2, ← submodule.restrict_scalars_top R S A,
submodule.restrict_scalars_inj, hc.2]⟩
theorem is_basis.smul_repr
{ι ι' : Type*} {b : ι → S} {c : ι' → A}
(hb : is_basis R b) (hc : is_basis S c) (x : A) (ij : ι × ι') :
(hb.smul hc).repr x ij = hb.repr (hc.repr x ij.2) ij.1 :=
begin
apply (hb.smul hc).repr_apply_eq,
{ intros x y, ext, simp only [linear_map.map_add, add_apply, pi.add_apply] },
{ intros c x, ext,
simp only [← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_smul S c x, linear_map.map_smul, smul_eq_mul,
← algebra.smul_def, smul_apply, pi.smul_apply] },
rintros ij,
ext ij',
rw single_apply,
split_ifs with hij,
{ simp [hij] },
rw [linear_map.map_smul, smul_apply, hc.repr_self_apply],
split_ifs with hj,
{ simp [hj, show ¬ (ij.1 = ij'.1), from λ hi, hij (prod.ext hi hj)] },
simp
end
theorem is_basis.smul_repr_mk
{ι ι' : Type*} {b : ι → S} {c : ι' → A}
(hb : is_basis R b) (hc : is_basis S c) (x : A) (i : ι) (j : ι') :
(hb.smul hc).repr x (i, j) = hb.repr (hc.repr x j) i :=
by simp [is_basis.smul_repr]
end ring
section artin_tate
variables (C : Type*)
variables [comm_ring A] [comm_ring B] [comm_ring C]
variables [algebra A B] [algebra B C] [algebra A C] [is_scalar_tower A B C]
open finset submodule
open_locale classical
lemma exists_subalgebra_of_fg (hAC : (⊤ : subalgebra A C).fg) (hBC : (⊤ : submodule B C).fg) :
∃ B₀ : subalgebra A B, B₀.fg ∧ (⊤ : submodule B₀ C).fg :=
begin
cases hAC with x hx,
cases hBC with y hy, have := hy,
simp_rw [eq_top_iff', mem_span_finset] at this, choose f hf,
let s : finset B := (finset.product (x ∪ (y * y)) y).image (function.uncurry f),
have hsx : ∀ (xi ∈ x) (yj ∈ y), f xi yj ∈ s := λ xi hxi yj hyj,
show function.uncurry f (xi, yj) ∈ s,
from mem_image_of_mem _ $ mem_product.2 ⟨mem_union_left _ hxi, hyj⟩,
have hsy : ∀ (yi yj yk ∈ y), f (yi * yj) yk ∈ s := λ yi yj yk hyi hyj hyk,
show function.uncurry f (yi * yj, yk) ∈ s,
from mem_image_of_mem _ $ mem_product.2 ⟨mem_union_right _ $ finset.mul_mem_mul hyi hyj, hyk⟩,
have hxy : ∀ xi ∈ x, xi ∈ span (algebra.adjoin A (↑s : set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : finset C) : set C) :=
λ xi hxi, hf xi ▸ sum_mem _ (λ yj hyj, smul_mem
(span (algebra.adjoin A (↑s : set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : finset C) : set C))
⟨f xi yj, algebra.subset_adjoin $ hsx xi hxi yj hyj⟩
(subset_span $ mem_insert_of_mem hyj)),
have hyy : span (algebra.adjoin A (↑s : set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : finset C) : set C) *
span (algebra.adjoin A (↑s : set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : finset C) : set C) ≤
span (algebra.adjoin A (↑s : set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : finset C) : set C),
{ rw [span_mul_span, span_le, coe_insert], rintros _ ⟨yi, yj, rfl | hyi, rfl | hyj, rfl⟩,
{ rw mul_one, exact subset_span (set.mem_insert _ _) },
{ rw one_mul, exact subset_span (set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hyj) },
{ rw mul_one, exact subset_span (set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hyi) },
{ rw ← hf (yi * yj), exact (submodule.mem_coe _).2 (sum_mem _ $ λ yk hyk, smul_mem
(span (algebra.adjoin A (↑s : set B)) (insert 1 ↑y : set C))
⟨f (yi * yj) yk, algebra.subset_adjoin $ hsy yi yj yk hyi hyj hyk⟩
(subset_span $ set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hyk : yk ∈ _)) } },
refine ⟨algebra.adjoin A (↑s : set B), subalgebra.fg_adjoin_finset _, insert 1 y, _⟩,
refine restrict_scalars_injective A _ _ _,
rw [restrict_scalars_top, eq_top_iff, ← algebra.coe_top, ← hx, algebra.adjoin_eq_span, span_le],
refine λ r hr, monoid.in_closure.rec_on hr hxy (subset_span $ mem_insert_self _ _)
(λ p q _ _ hp hq, hyy $ submodule.mul_mem_mul hp hq)
end
/-- Artin--Tate lemma: if A ⊆ B ⊆ C is a chain of subrings of commutative rings, and
A is noetherian, and C is algebra-finite over A, and C is module-finite over B,
then B is algebra-finite over A.
References: Atiyah--Macdonald Proposition 7.8; Stacks 00IS; Altman--Kleiman 16.17. -/
theorem fg_of_fg_of_fg [is_noetherian_ring A]
(hAC : (⊤ : subalgebra A C).fg) (hBC : (⊤ : submodule B C).fg)
(hBCi : function.injective (algebra_map B C)) :
(⊤ : subalgebra A B).fg :=
let ⟨B₀, hAB₀, hB₀C⟩ := exists_subalgebra_of_fg A B C hAC hBC in
algebra.fg_trans' (B₀.fg_top.2 hAB₀) $ subalgebra.fg_of_submodule_fg $
have is_noetherian_ring B₀, from is_noetherian_ring_of_fg hAB₀,
have is_noetherian B₀ C, by exactI is_noetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian' hB₀C,
by exactI fg_of_injective (is_scalar_tower.to_alg_hom B₀ B C).to_linear_map
(linear_map.ker_eq_bot.2 hBCi)
end artin_tate
|
a793c237eede106815ba332a139ef116d381f09f | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/topology/instances/irrational.lean | 357cfcadc28107f982c5de7d57ca3d42c98d7987 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,382 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import data.real.irrational
import data.rat.encodable
import topology.metric_space.baire
/-!
# Topology of irrational numbers
In this file we prove the following theorems:
* `is_Gδ_irrational`, `dense_irrational`, `eventually_residual_irrational`: irrational numbers
form a dense Gδ set;
* `irrational.eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_div`,
`irrational.eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_div_of_denom_le`;
`irrational.eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_rat_of_denom_le`: a sufficiently small neighborhood of
an irrational number is disjoint with the set of rational numbers with bounded denominator.
We also provide `order_topology`, `no_min_order`, `no_max_order`, and `densely_ordered`
instances for `{x // irrational x}`.
## Tags
irrational, residual
-/
open set filter metric
open_locale filter topology
lemma is_Gδ_irrational : is_Gδ {x | irrational x} :=
(countable_range _).is_Gδ_compl
lemma dense_irrational : dense {x : ℝ | irrational x} :=
begin
refine real.is_topological_basis_Ioo_rat.dense_iff.2 _,
simp only [mem_Union, mem_singleton_iff],
rintro _ ⟨a, b, hlt, rfl⟩ hne, rw inter_comm,
exact exists_irrational_btwn (rat.cast_lt.2 hlt)
end
lemma eventually_residual_irrational : ∀ᶠ x in residual ℝ, irrational x :=
eventually_residual.2 ⟨_, is_Gδ_irrational, dense_irrational, λ _, id⟩
namespace irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
instance : order_topology {x // irrational x} :=
induced_order_topology _ (λ x y, iff.rfl) $ λ x y hlt,
let ⟨a, ha, hxa, hay⟩ := exists_irrational_btwn hlt in ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, hxa, hay⟩
instance : no_max_order {x // irrational x} :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨x + (1 : ℕ), hx.add_nat 1⟩, by simp⟩⟩
instance : no_min_order {x // irrational x} :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨x - (1 : ℕ), hx.sub_nat 1⟩, by simp⟩⟩
instance : densely_ordered {x // irrational x} :=
⟨λ x y hlt, let ⟨z, hz, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_irrational_btwn hlt in ⟨⟨z, hz⟩, hxz, hzy⟩⟩
lemma eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_div (hx : irrational x) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ ε : ℝ in 𝓝 0, ∀ m : ℤ, ε ≤ dist x (m / n) :=
begin
have A : is_closed (range (λ m, n⁻¹ * m : ℤ → ℝ)),
from ((is_closed_map_smul₀ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)).comp
int.closed_embedding_coe_real.is_closed_map).closed_range,
have B : x ∉ range (λ m, n⁻¹ * m : ℤ → ℝ),
{ rintro ⟨m, rfl⟩, simpa using hx },
rcases metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (A.is_open_compl.mem_nhds B) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
refine (ge_mem_nhds ε0).mono (λ δ hδ m, not_lt.1 $ λ hlt, _),
rw dist_comm at hlt,
refine hε (ball_subset_ball hδ hlt) ⟨m, _⟩,
simp [div_eq_inv_mul]
end
lemma eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_div_of_denom_le (hx : irrational x) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ ε : ℝ in 𝓝 0, ∀ (k ≤ n) (m : ℤ), ε ≤ dist x (m / k) :=
(finite_le_nat n).eventually_all.2 $ λ k hk, hx.eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_div k
lemma eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_rat_of_denom_le (hx : irrational x) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ ε : ℝ in 𝓝 0, ∀ r : ℚ, r.denom ≤ n → ε ≤ dist x r :=
(hx.eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_div_of_denom_le n).mono $ λ ε H r hr,
by simpa only [rat.cast_def] using H r.denom hr r.num
end irrational
|
faa7104854575f988bf639be40971a3d30eef7c4 | 05b503addd423dd68145d68b8cde5cd595d74365 | /src/algebra/big_operators.lean | e52bb2c485866c68e9e9012eccbde365284538c7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | aestriplex/mathlib | 77513ff2b176d74a3bec114f33b519069788811d | e2fa8b2b1b732d7c25119229e3cdfba8370cb00f | refs/heads/master | 1,621,969,960,692 | 1,586,279,279,000 | 1,586,279,279,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 44,594 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Some big operators for lists and finite sets.
-/
import tactic.tauto data.list.defs data.finset data.nat.enat
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
theorem directed.finset_le {r : α → α → Prop} [is_trans α r]
{ι} (hι : nonempty ι) {f : ι → α} (D : directed r f) (s : finset ι) :
∃ z, ∀ i ∈ s, r (f i) (f z) :=
show ∃ z, ∀ i ∈ s.1, r (f i) (f z), from
multiset.induction_on s.1 (let ⟨z⟩ := hι in ⟨z, λ _, false.elim⟩) $
λ i s ⟨j, H⟩, let ⟨k, h₁, h₂⟩ := D i j in
⟨k, λ a h, or.cases_on (multiset.mem_cons.1 h)
(λ h, h.symm ▸ h₁)
(λ h, trans (H _ h) h₂)⟩
theorem finset.exists_le {α : Type u} [nonempty α] [directed_order α] (s : finset α) :
∃ M, ∀ i ∈ s, i ≤ M :=
directed.finset_le (by apply_instance) directed_order.directed s
namespace finset
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
/-- `s.prod f` is the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the finite set `s`. -/
@[to_additive "`s.sum f` is the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements
of the finite set `s`."]
protected def prod [comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) : β := (s.1.map f).prod
@[to_additive] lemma prod_eq_multiset_prod [comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) :
s.prod f = (s.1.map f).prod := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_fold [comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) : s.prod f = s.fold (*) 1 f := rfl
end finset
@[to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.map_prod [comm_monoid β] [comm_monoid γ] (g : β →* γ) (f : α → β) (s : finset α) :
g (s.prod f) = s.prod (λx, g (f x)) :=
by simp only [finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, g.map_multiset_prod, multiset.map_map]
lemma ring_hom.map_prod [comm_semiring β] [comm_semiring γ]
(g : β →+* γ) (f : α → β) (s : finset α) :
g (s.prod f) = s.prod (λx, g (f x)) :=
g.to_monoid_hom.map_prod f s
lemma ring_hom.map_sum [semiring β] [semiring γ]
(g : β →+* γ) (f : α → β) (s : finset α) :
g (s.sum f) = s.sum (λx, g (f x)) :=
g.to_add_monoid_hom.map_sum f s
namespace finset
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
section comm_monoid
variables [comm_monoid β]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_empty {α : Type u} {f : α → β} : (∅:finset α).prod f = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_insert [decidable_eq α] : a ∉ s → (insert a s).prod f = f a * s.prod f := fold_insert
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_singleton : (singleton a).prod f = f a :=
eq.trans fold_singleton $ mul_one _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_pair [decidable_eq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) :
({a, b} : finset α).prod f = f a * f b :=
by simp [prod_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h.symm), mul_comm]
@[simp, priority 1100] lemma prod_const_one : s.prod (λx, (1 : β)) = 1 :=
by simp only [finset.prod, multiset.map_const, multiset.prod_repeat, one_pow]
@[simp, priority 1100] lemma sum_const_zero {β} {s : finset α} [add_comm_monoid β] :
s.sum (λx, (0 : β)) = 0 :=
@prod_const_one _ (multiplicative β) _ _
attribute [to_additive] prod_const_one
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_image [decidable_eq α] {s : finset γ} {g : γ → α} :
(∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, g x = g y → x = y) → (s.image g).prod f = s.prod (λx, f (g x)) :=
fold_image
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_map (s : finset α) (e : α ↪ γ) (f : γ → β) :
(s.map e).prod f = s.prod (λa, f (e a)) :=
by rw [finset.prod, finset.map_val, multiset.map_map]; refl
@[congr, to_additive]
lemma prod_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) : (∀x∈s₂, f x = g x) → s₁.prod f = s₂.prod g :=
by rw [h]; exact fold_congr
attribute [congr] finset.sum_congr
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_inter [decidable_eq α] :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).prod f * (s₁ ∩ s₂).prod f = s₁.prod f * s₂.prod f :=
fold_union_inter
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union [decidable_eq α] (h : disjoint s₁ s₂) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).prod f = s₁.prod f * s₂.prod f :=
by rw [←prod_union_inter, (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp h)]; exact (mul_one _).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sdiff [decidable_eq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : (s₂ \ s₁).prod f * s₁.prod f = s₂.prod f :=
by rw [←prod_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_of_subset h]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_sum_elim [decidable_eq (α ⊕ γ)]
(s : finset α) (t : finset γ) (f : α → β) (g : γ → β) :
(s.image sum.inl ∪ t.image sum.inr).prod (sum.elim f g) = s.prod f * t.prod g :=
begin
rw [prod_union, prod_image, prod_image],
{ simp only [sum.elim_inl, sum.elim_inr] },
{ exact λ _ _ _ _, sum.inr.inj },
{ exact λ _ _ _ _, sum.inl.inj },
{ rintros i hi,
erw [finset.mem_inter, finset.mem_image, finset.mem_image] at hi,
rcases hi with ⟨⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, ⟨j, hj, H⟩⟩,
cases H }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_bind [decidable_eq α] {s : finset γ} {t : γ → finset α} :
(∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≠ y → disjoint (t x) (t y)) → (s.bind t).prod f = s.prod (λx, (t x).prod f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq γ; exact
finset.induction_on s (λ _, by simp only [bind_empty, prod_empty])
(assume x s hxs ih hd,
have hd' : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≠ y → disjoint (t x) (t y),
from assume _ hx _ hy, hd _ (mem_insert_of_mem hx) _ (mem_insert_of_mem hy),
have ∀y∈s, x ≠ y,
from assume _ hy h, by rw [←h] at hy; contradiction,
have ∀y∈s, disjoint (t x) (t y),
from assume _ hy, hd _ (mem_insert_self _ _) _ (mem_insert_of_mem hy) (this _ hy),
have disjoint (t x) (finset.bind s t),
from (disjoint_bind_right _ _ _).mpr this,
by simp only [bind_insert, prod_insert hxs, prod_union this, ih hd'])
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_product {s : finset γ} {t : finset α} {f : γ×α → β} :
(s.product t).prod f = s.prod (λx, t.prod $ λy, f (x, y)) :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq α, haveI := classical.dec_eq γ,
rw [product_eq_bind, prod_bind],
{ congr, funext, exact prod_image (λ _ _ _ _ H, (prod.mk.inj H).2) },
simp only [disjoint_iff_ne, mem_image],
rintros _ _ _ _ h ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ _,
apply h, cc
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sigma {σ : α → Type*}
{s : finset α} {t : Πa, finset (σ a)} {f : sigma σ → β} :
(s.sigma t).prod f = s.prod (λa, (t a).prod $ λs, f ⟨a, s⟩) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; haveI := (λ a, classical.dec_eq (σ a)); exact
calc (s.sigma t).prod f =
(s.bind (λa, (t a).image (λs, sigma.mk a s))).prod f : by rw sigma_eq_bind
... = s.prod (λa, ((t a).image (λs, sigma.mk a s)).prod f) :
prod_bind $ assume a₁ ha a₂ ha₂ h,
by simp only [disjoint_iff_ne, mem_image];
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩; apply h; cc
... = (s.prod $ λa, (t a).prod $ λs, f ⟨a, s⟩) :
prod_congr rfl $ λ _ _, prod_image $ λ _ _ _ _ _, by cc
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_image' [decidable_eq α] {s : finset γ} {g : γ → α} (h : γ → β)
(eq : ∀c∈s, f (g c) = (s.filter (λc', g c' = g c)).prod h) :
(s.image g).prod f = s.prod h :=
begin
letI := classical.dec_eq γ,
rw [← image_bind_filter_eq s g] {occs := occurrences.pos [2]},
rw [finset.prod_bind],
{ refine finset.prod_congr rfl (assume a ha, _),
rcases finset.mem_image.1 ha with ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩,
exact eq b hb },
assume a₀ _ a₁ _ ne,
refine (disjoint_iff_ne.2 _),
assume c₀ h₀ c₁ h₁,
rcases mem_filter.1 h₀ with ⟨h₀, rfl⟩,
rcases mem_filter.1 h₁ with ⟨h₁, rfl⟩,
exact mt (congr_arg g) ne
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_distrib : s.prod (λx, f x * g x) = s.prod f * s.prod g :=
eq.trans (by rw one_mul; refl) fold_op_distrib
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_comm {s : finset γ} {t : finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
s.prod (λx, t.prod $ f x) = t.prod (λy, s.prod $ λx, f x y) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
{ simp only [prod_empty, prod_const_one] },
{ intros _ _ H ih,
simp only [prod_insert H, prod_mul_distrib, ih] }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_hom [comm_monoid γ] (s : finset α) {f : α → β} (g : β → γ) [is_monoid_hom g] :
s.prod (λx, g (f x)) = g (s.prod f) :=
((monoid_hom.of g).map_prod f s).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_hom_rel [comm_monoid γ] {r : β → γ → Prop} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : finset α}
(h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀a b c, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) : r (s.prod f) (s.prod g) :=
by { delta finset.prod, apply multiset.prod_hom_rel; assumption }
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀x∈s₂, x ∉ s₁ → f x = 1) : s₁.prod f = s₂.prod f :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
have (s₂ \ s₁).prod f = (s₂ \ s₁).prod (λx, 1),
from prod_congr rfl $ by simpa only [mem_sdiff, and_imp],
by rw [←prod_sdiff h]; simp only [this, prod_const_one, one_mul]
-- If we use `[decidable_eq β]` here, some rewrites fail because they find a wrong `decidable`
-- instance first; `{∀x, decidable (f x ≠ 1)}` doesn't work with `rw ← prod_filter_ne_one`
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_filter_ne_one [∀ x, decidable (f x ≠ 1)] : (s.filter $ λx, f x ≠ 1).prod f = s.prod f :=
prod_subset (filter_subset _) $ λ x,
by { classical, rw [not_imp_comm, mem_filter], exact and.intro }
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → β) :
(s.filter p).prod f = s.prod (λa, if p a then f a else 1) :=
calc (s.filter p).prod f = (s.filter p).prod (λa, if p a then f a else 1) :
prod_congr rfl (assume a h, by rw [if_pos (mem_filter.1 h).2])
... = s.prod (λa, if p a then f a else 1) :
begin
refine prod_subset (filter_subset s) (assume x hs h, _),
rw [mem_filter, not_and] at h,
exact if_neg (h hs)
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_eq_single {s : finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α)
(h₀ : ∀b∈s, b ≠ a → f b = 1) (h₁ : a ∉ s → f a = 1) : s.prod f = f a :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α;
from classical.by_cases
(assume : a ∈ s,
calc s.prod f = ({a} : finset α).prod f :
begin
refine (prod_subset _ _).symm,
{ intros _ H, rwa mem_singleton.1 H },
{ simpa only [mem_singleton] }
end
... = f a : prod_singleton)
(assume : a ∉ s,
(prod_congr rfl $ λ b hb, h₀ b hb $ by rintro rfl; cc).trans $
prod_const_one.trans (h₁ this).symm)
@[to_additive] lemma prod_apply_ite {s : finset α}
{p : α → Prop} {hp : decidable_pred p} (f g : α → γ) (h : γ → β) :
s.prod (λ x, h (if p x then f x else g x)) =
(s.filter p).prod (λ x, h (f x)) * (s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).prod (λ x, h (g x)) :=
by letI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
calc s.prod (λ x, h (if p x then f x else g x))
= (s.filter p ∪ s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).prod (λ x, h (if p x then f x else g x)) :
by rw [filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
... = (s.filter p).prod (λ x, h (if p x then f x else g x)) *
(s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).prod (λ x, h (if p x then f x else g x)) :
prod_union (by simp [disjoint_right] {contextual := tt})
... = (s.filter p).prod (λ x, h (f x)) * (s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).prod (λ x, h (g x)) :
congr_arg2 _
(prod_congr rfl (by simp {contextual := tt}))
(prod_congr rfl (by simp {contextual := tt}))
@[to_additive] lemma prod_ite {s : finset α}
{p : α → Prop} {hp : decidable_pred p} (f g : α → β) :
s.prod (λ x, if p x then f x else g x) =
(s.filter p).prod (λ x, f x) * (s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).prod (λ x, g x) :=
by simp [prod_apply_ite _ _ (λ x, x)]
@[simp, to_additive] lemma prod_ite_eq [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
s.prod (λ x, (ite (a = x) (b x) 1)) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
begin
rw ←finset.prod_filter,
split_ifs;
simp only [filter_eq, if_true, if_false, h, prod_empty, prod_singleton, insert_empty_eq_singleton],
end
/--
When a product is taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality test on the index
and whose alternative is 1, then the product's value is either the term at that index or `1`.
The difference with `prod_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `eq` are swapped.
-/
@[simp, to_additive] lemma prod_ite_eq' [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
s.prod (λ x, (ite (x = a) (b x) 1)) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
begin
rw ←prod_ite_eq,
congr, ext x,
by_cases x = a; finish
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_attach {f : α → β} : s.attach.prod (λx, f x.val) = s.prod f :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
calc s.attach.prod (λx, f x.val) = ((s.attach).image subtype.val).prod f :
by rw [prod_image]; exact assume x _ y _, subtype.eq
... = _ : by rw [attach_image_val]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_bij {s : finset α} {t : finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : Πa∈s, γ) (hi : ∀a ha, i a ha ∈ t) (h : ∀a ha, f a = g (i a ha))
(i_inj : ∀a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (i_surj : ∀b∈t, ∃a ha, b = i a ha) :
s.prod f = t.prod g :=
congr_arg multiset.prod
(multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup f g s.2 t.2 i hi h i_inj i_surj)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_bij_ne_one {s : finset α} {t : finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : Πa∈s, f a ≠ 1 → γ) (hi₁ : ∀a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ ∈ t)
(hi₂ : ∀a₁ a₂ h₁₁ h₁₂ h₂₁ h₂₂, i a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ = i a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(hi₃ : ∀b∈t, g b ≠ 1 → ∃a h₁ h₂, b = i a h₁ h₂)
(h : ∀a h₁ h₂, f a = g (i a h₁ h₂)) :
s.prod f = t.prod g :=
by classical; exact
calc s.prod f = (s.filter $ λx, f x ≠ 1).prod f : prod_filter_ne_one.symm
... = (t.filter $ λx, g x ≠ 1).prod g :
prod_bij (assume a ha, i a (mem_filter.mp ha).1 (mem_filter.mp ha).2)
(assume a ha, (mem_filter.mp ha).elim $ λh₁ h₂, mem_filter.mpr
⟨hi₁ a h₁ h₂, λ hg, h₂ (hg ▸ h a h₁ h₂)⟩)
(assume a ha, (mem_filter.mp ha).elim $ h a)
(assume a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂,
(mem_filter.mp ha₁).elim $ λha₁₁ ha₁₂, (mem_filter.mp ha₂).elim $ λha₂₁ ha₂₂, hi₂ a₁ a₂ _ _ _ _)
(assume b hb, (mem_filter.mp hb).elim $ λh₁ h₂,
let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂, eq⟩ := hi₃ b h₁ h₂ in ⟨a, mem_filter.mpr ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, eq⟩)
... = t.prod g : prod_filter_ne_one
@[to_additive]
lemma nonempty_of_prod_ne_one (h : s.prod f ≠ 1) : s.nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ H, false.elim $ h $ H.symm ▸ prod_empty) id
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one (h : s.prod f ≠ 1) : ∃a∈s, f a ≠ 1 :=
begin
classical,
rw ← prod_filter_ne_one at h,
rcases nonempty_of_prod_ne_one h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, (mem_filter.1 hx).1, (mem_filter.1 hx).2⟩
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_succ (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(range (nat.succ n)).prod f = f n * (range n).prod f :=
by rw [range_succ, prod_insert not_mem_range_self]
lemma prod_range_succ' (f : ℕ → β) :
∀ n : ℕ, (range (nat.succ n)).prod f = (range n).prod (f ∘ nat.succ) * f 0
| 0 := (prod_range_succ _ _).trans $ mul_comm _ _
| (n + 1) := by rw [prod_range_succ (λ m, f (nat.succ m)), mul_assoc, ← prod_range_succ'];
exact prod_range_succ _ _
lemma sum_Ico_add {δ : Type*} [add_comm_monoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) (m n k : ℕ) :
(Ico m n).sum (λ l, f (k + l)) = (Ico (m + k) (n + k)).sum f :=
Ico.image_add m n k ▸ eq.symm $ sum_image $ λ x hx y hy h, nat.add_left_cancel h
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ico_add (f : ℕ → β) (m n k : ℕ) :
(Ico m n).prod (λ l, f (k + l)) = (Ico (m + k) (n + k)).prod f :=
Ico.image_add m n k ▸ eq.symm $ prod_image $ λ x hx y hy h, nat.add_left_cancel h
lemma sum_Ico_succ_top {δ : Type*} [add_comm_monoid δ] {a b : ℕ}
(hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → δ) : (Ico a (b + 1)).sum f = (Ico a b).sum f + f b :=
by rw [Ico.succ_top hab, sum_insert Ico.not_mem_top, add_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ico_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → β) :
(Ico a b.succ).prod f = (Ico a b).prod f * f b :=
@sum_Ico_succ_top (additive β) _ _ _ hab _
lemma sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot {δ : Type*} [add_comm_monoid δ] {a b : ℕ}
(hab : a < b) (f : ℕ → δ) : (Ico a b).sum f = f a + (Ico (a + 1) b).sum f :=
have ha : a ∉ Ico (a + 1) b, by simp,
by rw [← sum_insert ha, Ico.insert_succ_bot hab]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot {a b : ℕ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℕ → β) :
(Ico a b).prod f = f a * (Ico (a + 1) b).prod f :=
@sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot (additive β) _ _ _ hab _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ico_consecutive (f : ℕ → β) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
(Ico m n).prod f * (Ico n k).prod f = (Ico m k).prod f :=
Ico.union_consecutive hmn hnk ▸ eq.symm $ prod_union $ Ico.disjoint_consecutive m n k
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_mul_prod_Ico (f : ℕ → β) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
(range m).prod f * (Ico m n).prod f = (range n).prod f :=
Ico.zero_bot m ▸ Ico.zero_bot n ▸ prod_Ico_consecutive f (nat.zero_le m) h
@[to_additive sum_Ico_eq_add_neg]
lemma prod_Ico_eq_div {δ : Type*} [comm_group δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
(Ico m n).prod f = (range n).prod f * ((range m).prod f)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq.2 $ by rw [mul_comm]; exact prod_range_mul_prod_Ico f h
lemma sum_Ico_eq_sub {δ : Type*} [add_comm_group δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
(Ico m n).sum f = (range n).sum f - (range m).sum f :=
sum_Ico_eq_add_neg f h
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ico_eq_prod_range (f : ℕ → β) (m n : ℕ) :
(Ico m n).prod f = (range (n - m)).prod (λ l, f (m + l)) :=
begin
by_cases h : m ≤ n,
{ rw [← Ico.zero_bot, prod_Ico_add, zero_add, nat.sub_add_cancel h] },
{ replace h : n ≤ m := le_of_not_ge h,
rw [Ico.eq_empty_of_le h, nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h, range_zero, prod_empty, prod_empty] }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_zero (f : ℕ → β) :
(range 0).prod f = 1 :=
by rw [range_zero, prod_empty]
lemma prod_range_one (f : ℕ → β) :
(range 1).prod f = f 0 :=
by { rw [range_one], apply @prod_singleton ℕ β 0 f }
lemma sum_range_one {δ : Type*} [add_comm_monoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) :
(range 1).sum f = f 0 :=
by { rw [range_one], apply @sum_singleton ℕ δ 0 f }
attribute [to_additive finset.sum_range_one] prod_range_one
@[simp] lemma prod_const (b : β) : s.prod (λ a, b) = b ^ s.card :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s rfl (λ a s has ih,
by rw [prod_insert has, card_insert_of_not_mem has, pow_succ, ih])
lemma prod_pow (s : finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → β) :
s.prod (λ x, f x ^ n) = s.prod f ^ n :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [_root_.mul_pow] {contextual := tt})
lemma prod_nat_pow (s : finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → ℕ) :
s.prod (λ x, f x ^ n) = s.prod f ^ n :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [nat.mul_pow] {contextual := tt})
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_involution {s : finset α} {f : α → β} :
∀ (g : Π a ∈ s, α)
(h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a * f (g a ha) = 1)
(h₂ : ∀ a ha, f a ≠ 1 → g a ha ≠ a)
(h₃ : ∀ a ha, g a ha ∈ s)
(h₄ : ∀ a ha, g (g a ha) (h₃ a ha) = a),
s.prod f = 1 :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α;
haveI := classical.dec_eq β; exact
finset.strong_induction_on s
(λ s ih g h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄,
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ hs, hs.symm ▸ rfl)
(λ ⟨x, hx⟩,
have hmem : ∀ y ∈ (s.erase x).erase (g x hx), y ∈ s,
from λ y hy, (mem_of_mem_erase (mem_of_mem_erase hy)),
have g_inj : ∀ {x hx y hy}, g x hx = g y hy → x = y,
from λ x hx y hy h, by rw [← h₄ x hx, ← h₄ y hy]; simp [h],
have ih': (erase (erase s x) (g x hx)).prod f = (1 : β) :=
ih ((s.erase x).erase (g x hx))
⟨subset.trans (erase_subset _ _) (erase_subset _ _),
λ h, not_mem_erase (g x hx) (s.erase x) (h (h₃ x hx))⟩
(λ y hy, g y (hmem y hy))
(λ y hy, h₁ y (hmem y hy))
(λ y hy, h₂ y (hmem y hy))
(λ y hy, mem_erase.2 ⟨λ (h : g y _ = g x hx), by simpa [g_inj h] using hy,
mem_erase.2 ⟨λ (h : g y _ = x),
have y = g x hx, from h₄ y (hmem y hy) ▸ by simp [h],
by simpa [this] using hy, h₃ y (hmem y hy)⟩⟩)
(λ y hy, h₄ y (hmem y hy)),
if hx1 : f x = 1
then ih' ▸ eq.symm (prod_subset hmem
(λ y hy hy₁,
have y = x ∨ y = g x hx, by simp [hy] at hy₁; tauto,
this.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ hx1)
(λ h, h₁ x hx ▸ h ▸ hx1.symm ▸ (one_mul _).symm)))
else by rw [← insert_erase hx, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
← insert_erase (mem_erase.2 ⟨h₂ x hx hx1, h₃ x hx⟩),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ih', mul_one, h₁ x hx]))
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_eq_one {f : α → β} {s : finset α} (h : ∀x∈s, f x = 1) : s.prod f = 1 :=
calc s.prod f = s.prod (λx, 1) : finset.prod_congr rfl h
... = 1 : finset.prod_const_one
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_powerset_insert [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) (f : finset α → β) :
(insert x s).powerset.prod f = s.powerset.prod f * s.powerset.prod (λt, f (insert x t)) :=
begin
rw [powerset_insert, finset.prod_union, finset.prod_image],
{ assume t₁ h₁ t₂ h₂ heq,
rw [← finset.erase_insert (not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem h₁ h),
← finset.erase_insert (not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem h₂ h), heq] },
{ rw finset.disjoint_iff_ne,
assume t₁ h₁ t₂ h₂,
rcases finset.mem_image.1 h₂ with ⟨t₃, h₃, H₃₂⟩,
rw ← H₃₂,
exact ne_insert_of_not_mem _ _ (not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem h₁ h) }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_piecewise [decidable_eq α] (s t : finset α) (f g : α → β) :
s.prod (t.piecewise f g) = (s ∩ t).prod f * (s \ t).prod g :=
by { rw [piecewise, prod_ite, filter_mem_eq_inter, ← sdiff_eq_filter], }
/-- If we can partition a product into subsets that cancel out, then the whole product cancels. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_cancels_of_partition_cancels (R : setoid α) [decidable_rel R.r]
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, (s.filter (λy, y ≈ x)).prod f = 1) : s.prod f = 1 :=
begin
suffices : (s.image quotient.mk).prod (λ xbar, (s.filter (λ y, ⟦y⟧ = xbar)).prod f) = s.prod f,
{ rw [←this, ←finset.prod_eq_one],
intros xbar xbar_in_s,
rcases (mem_image).mp xbar_in_s with ⟨x, x_in_s, xbar_eq_x⟩,
rw [←xbar_eq_x, filter_congr (λ y _, @quotient.eq _ R y x)],
apply h x x_in_s },
apply finset.prod_image' f,
intros,
refl
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_update_of_not_mem [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {i : α}
(h : i ∉ s) (f : α → β) (b : β) : s.prod (function.update f i b) = s.prod f :=
begin
apply prod_congr rfl (λj hj, _),
have : j ≠ i, by { assume eq, rw eq at hj, exact h hj },
simp [this]
end
lemma prod_update_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s) (f : α → β) (b : β) :
s.prod (function.update f i b) = b * (s \ (singleton i)).prod f :=
by { rw [update_eq_piecewise, prod_piecewise], simp [h] }
end comm_monoid
lemma sum_update_of_mem [add_comm_monoid β] [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {i : α}
(h : i ∈ s) (f : α → β) (b : β) :
s.sum (function.update f i b) = b + (s \ (singleton i)).sum f :=
by { rw [update_eq_piecewise, sum_piecewise], simp [h] }
attribute [to_additive] prod_update_of_mem
lemma sum_smul' [add_comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → β) :
s.sum (λ x, add_monoid.smul n (f x)) = add_monoid.smul n (s.sum f) :=
@prod_pow _ (multiplicative β) _ _ _ _
attribute [to_additive sum_smul'] prod_pow
@[simp] lemma sum_const [add_comm_monoid β] (b : β) :
s.sum (λ a, b) = add_monoid.smul s.card b :=
@prod_const _ (multiplicative β) _ _ _
attribute [to_additive] prod_const
@[simp]
lemma sum_boole {s : finset α} {p : α → Prop} [semiring β] {hp : decidable_pred p} :
s.sum (λ x, if p x then (1 : β) else (0 : β)) = (s.filter p).card :=
by simp [sum_ite]
lemma sum_range_succ' [add_comm_monoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∀ n : ℕ, (range (nat.succ n)).sum f = (range n).sum (f ∘ nat.succ) + f 0 :=
@prod_range_succ' (multiplicative β) _ _
attribute [to_additive] prod_range_succ'
lemma sum_nat_cast [add_comm_monoid β] [has_one β] (s : finset α) (f : α → ℕ) :
↑(s.sum f) = s.sum (λa, f a : α → β) :=
(nat.cast_add_monoid_hom β).map_sum f s
lemma prod_nat_cast [comm_semiring β] (s : finset α) (f : α → ℕ) :
↑(s.prod f) = s.prod (λa, f a : α → β) :=
(nat.cast_ring_hom β).map_prod f s
protected lemma sum_nat_coe_enat (s : finset α) (f : α → ℕ) :
s.sum (λ x, (f x : enat)) = (s.sum f : ℕ) :=
begin
classical,
induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ simp },
{ simp [has, ih] }
end
theorem dvd_sum [comm_semiring α] {a : α} {s : finset β} {f : β → α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, a ∣ f x) : a ∣ s.sum f :=
multiset.dvd_sum (λ y hy, by rcases multiset.mem_map.1 hy with ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact h x hx)
lemma le_sum_of_subadditive [add_comm_monoid α] [ordered_comm_monoid β]
(f : α → β) (h_zero : f 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (s : finset γ) (g : γ → α) :
f (s.sum g) ≤ s.sum (λc, f (g c)) :=
begin
refine le_trans (multiset.le_sum_of_subadditive f h_zero h_add _) _,
rw [multiset.map_map],
refl
end
lemma abs_sum_le_sum_abs [discrete_linear_ordered_field α] {f : β → α} {s : finset β} :
abs (s.sum f) ≤ s.sum (λa, abs (f a)) :=
le_sum_of_subadditive _ abs_zero abs_add s f
section comm_group
variables [comm_group β]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_inv_distrib : s.prod (λx, (f x)⁻¹) = (s.prod f)⁻¹ :=
s.prod_hom has_inv.inv
end comm_group
@[simp] theorem card_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : finset α) (t : Π a, finset (σ a)) :
card (s.sigma t) = s.sum (λ a, card (t a)) :=
multiset.card_sigma _ _
lemma card_bind [decidable_eq β] {s : finset α} {t : α → finset β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → disjoint (t x) (t y)) :
(s.bind t).card = s.sum (λ u, card (t u)) :=
calc (s.bind t).card = (s.bind t).sum (λ _, 1) : by simp
... = s.sum (λ a, (t a).sum (λ _, 1)) : finset.sum_bind h
... = s.sum (λ u, card (t u)) : by simp
lemma card_bind_le [decidable_eq β] {s : finset α} {t : α → finset β} :
(s.bind t).card ≤ s.sum (λ a, (t a).card) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s (by simp)
(λ a s has ih,
calc ((insert a s).bind t).card ≤ (t a).card + (s.bind t).card :
by rw bind_insert; exact finset.card_union_le _ _
... ≤ (insert a s).sum (λ a, card (t a)) :
by rw sum_insert has; exact add_le_add_left ih _)
theorem card_eq_sum_card_image [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (s : finset α) :
s.card = (s.image f).sum (λ a, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card) :=
by letI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
calc s.card = ((s.image f).bind (λ a, s.filter (λ x, f x = a))).card :
congr_arg _ (finset.ext.2 $ λ x,
⟨λ hs, mem_bind.2 ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hs,
mem_filter.2 ⟨hs, rfl⟩⟩,
λ h, let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_bind.1 h in by convert filter_subset s ha₂⟩)
... = (s.image f).sum (λ a, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card) :
card_bind (by simp [disjoint_left, finset.ext] {contextual := tt})
lemma gsmul_sum [add_comm_group β] {f : α → β} {s : finset α} (z : ℤ) :
gsmul z (s.sum f) = s.sum (λa, gsmul z (f a)) :=
(s.sum_hom (gsmul z)).symm
end finset
namespace finset
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset α} {f g : α → β} {b : β} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma sum_sub_distrib [add_comm_group β] : s.sum (λx, f x - g x) = s.sum f - s.sum g :=
sum_add_distrib.trans $ congr_arg _ sum_neg_distrib
section comm_monoid
variables [comm_monoid β]
lemma prod_pow_boole [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
s.prod (λ x, (f x)^(ite (a = x) 1 0)) = ite (a ∈ s) (f a) 1 :=
by simp
end comm_monoid
section semiring
variables [semiring β]
lemma sum_mul : s.sum f * b = s.sum (λx, f x * b) :=
(s.sum_hom (λ x, x * b)).symm
lemma mul_sum : b * s.sum f = s.sum (λx, b * f x) :=
(s.sum_hom _).symm
lemma sum_mul_boole [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
s.sum (λ x, (f x * ite (a = x) 1 0)) = ite (a ∈ s) (f a) 0 :=
by simp
lemma sum_boole_mul [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
s.sum (λ x, (ite (a = x) 1 0) * f x) = ite (a ∈ s) (f a) 0 :=
by simp
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring β]
lemma prod_eq_zero (ha : a ∈ s) (h : f a = 0) : s.prod f = 0 :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α;
calc s.prod f = (insert a (erase s a)).prod f : by rw insert_erase ha
... = 0 : by rw [prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), h, zero_mul]
/-- The product over a sum can be written as a sum over the product of sets, `finset.pi`.
`finset.prod_univ_sum` is an alternative statement when the product is over `univ`. -/
lemma prod_sum {δ : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] [∀a, decidable_eq (δ a)]
{s : finset α} {t : Πa, finset (δ a)} {f : Πa, δ a → β} :
s.prod (λa, (t a).sum (λb, f a b)) =
(s.pi t).sum (λp, s.attach.prod (λx, f x.1 (p x.1 x.2))) :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction with a s ha ih,
{ rw [pi_empty, sum_singleton], refl },
{ have h₁ : ∀x ∈ t a, ∀y ∈ t a, ∀h : x ≠ y,
disjoint (image (pi.cons s a x) (pi s t)) (image (pi.cons s a y) (pi s t)),
{ assume x hx y hy h,
simp only [disjoint_iff_ne, mem_image],
rintros _ ⟨p₂, hp, eq₂⟩ _ ⟨p₃, hp₃, eq₃⟩ eq,
have : pi.cons s a x p₂ a (mem_insert_self _ _) = pi.cons s a y p₃ a (mem_insert_self _ _),
{ rw [eq₂, eq₃, eq] },
rw [pi.cons_same, pi.cons_same] at this,
exact h this },
rw [prod_insert ha, pi_insert ha, ih, sum_mul, sum_bind h₁],
refine sum_congr rfl (λ b _, _),
have h₂ : ∀p₁∈pi s t, ∀p₂∈pi s t, pi.cons s a b p₁ = pi.cons s a b p₂ → p₁ = p₂, from
assume p₁ h₁ p₂ h₂ eq, injective_pi_cons ha eq,
rw [sum_image h₂, mul_sum],
refine sum_congr rfl (λ g _, _),
rw [attach_insert, prod_insert, prod_image],
{ simp only [pi.cons_same],
congr', ext ⟨v, hv⟩, congr',
exact (pi.cons_ne (by rintro rfl; exact ha hv)).symm },
{ exact λ _ _ _ _, subtype.eq ∘ subtype.mk.inj },
{ simp only [mem_image], rintro ⟨⟨_, hm⟩, _, rfl⟩, exact ha hm } }
end
open_locale classical
/-- The product of `f a + g a` over all of `s` is the sum
over the powerset of `s` of the product of `f` over a subset `t` times
the product of `g` over the complement of `t` -/
lemma prod_add (f g : α → β) (s : finset α) :
s.prod (λ a, f a + g a) =
s.powerset.sum (λ t : finset α, t.prod f * (s \ t).prod g) :=
calc s.prod (λ a, f a + g a)
= s.prod (λ a, ({false, true} : finset Prop).sum
(λ p : Prop, if p then f a else g a)) : by simp
... = (s.pi (λ _, {false, true})).sum (λ p : Π a ∈ s, Prop,
s.attach.prod (λ a : {a // a ∈ s}, if p a.1 a.2 then f a.1 else g a.1)) : prod_sum
... = s.powerset.sum (λ (t : finset α), t.prod f * (s \ t).prod g) : begin
refine eq.symm (sum_bij (λ t _ a _, a ∈ t) _ _ _ _),
{ simp [subset_iff]; tauto },
{ intros t ht,
erw [prod_ite (λ a : {a // a ∈ s}, f a.1) (λ a : {a // a ∈ s}, g a.1)],
refine congr_arg2 _
(prod_bij (λ (a : α) (ha : a ∈ t), ⟨a, mem_powerset.1 ht ha⟩)
_ _ _
(λ b hb, ⟨b, by cases b; finish⟩))
(prod_bij (λ (a : α) (ha : a ∈ s \ t), ⟨a, by simp * at *⟩)
_ _ _
(λ b hb, ⟨b, by cases b; finish⟩));
intros; simp * at *; simp * at * },
{ finish [function.funext_iff, finset.ext, subset_iff] },
{ assume f hf,
exact ⟨s.filter (λ a : α, ∃ h : a ∈ s, f a h),
by simp, by funext; intros; simp *⟩ }
end
/-- Summing `a^s.card * b^(n-s.card)` over all finite subsets `s` of a `finset`
gives `(a + b)^s.card`.-/
lemma sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow
{α R : Type*} [comm_semiring R] (a b : R) (s : finset α) :
s.powerset.sum (λ t : finset α, a ^ t.card * b ^ (s.card - t.card)) =
(a + b) ^ s.card :=
begin
rw [← prod_const, prod_add],
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ t ht, _),
rw [prod_const, prod_const, ← card_sdiff (mem_powerset.1 ht)]
end
lemma prod_pow_eq_pow_sum {x : β} {f : α → ℕ} :
∀ {s : finset α}, s.prod (λ i, x ^ (f i)) = x ^ (s.sum f) :=
begin
apply finset.induction,
{ simp },
{ assume a s has H,
rw [finset.prod_insert has, finset.sum_insert has, pow_add, H] }
end
end comm_semiring
section integral_domain /- add integral_semi_domain to support nat and ennreal -/
variables [integral_domain β]
lemma prod_eq_zero_iff : s.prod f = 0 ↔ (∃a∈s, f a = 0) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
exact ⟨not.elim one_ne_zero, λ ⟨_, H, _⟩, H.elim⟩,
assume a s ha ih,
rw [prod_insert ha, mul_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_zero, bex_def, exists_mem_insert, ih, ← bex_def]
end
end integral_domain
section ordered_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_comm_monoid β]
lemma sum_le_sum : (∀x∈s, f x ≤ g x) → s.sum f ≤ s.sum g :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
exact (λ _, le_refl _),
assume a s ha ih h,
have : f a + s.sum f ≤ g a + s.sum g,
from add_le_add' (h _ (mem_insert_self _ _)) (ih $ assume x hx, h _ $ mem_insert_of_mem hx),
by simpa only [sum_insert ha]
end
lemma sum_nonneg (h : ∀x∈s, 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ s.sum f := le_trans (by rw [sum_const_zero]) (sum_le_sum h)
lemma sum_nonpos (h : ∀x∈s, f x ≤ 0) : s.sum f ≤ 0 := le_trans (sum_le_sum h) (by rw [sum_const_zero])
lemma sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀x∈s₂, x ∉ s₁ → 0 ≤ f x) : s₁.sum f ≤ s₂.sum f :=
by classical;
calc s₁.sum f ≤ (s₂ \ s₁).sum f + s₁.sum f :
le_add_of_nonneg_left' $ sum_nonneg $ by simpa only [mem_sdiff, and_imp]
... = (s₂ \ s₁ ∪ s₁).sum f : (sum_union sdiff_disjoint).symm
... = s₂.sum f : by rw [sdiff_union_of_subset h]
lemma sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg : (∀x∈s, 0 ≤ f x) → (s.sum f = 0 ↔ ∀x∈s, f x = 0) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
exact λ _, ⟨λ _ _, false.elim, λ _, rfl⟩,
assume a s ha ih H,
have : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x, from λ _, H _ ∘ mem_insert_of_mem,
rw [sum_insert ha, add_eq_zero_iff' (H _ $ mem_insert_self _ _) (sum_nonneg this),
forall_mem_insert, ih this]
end
lemma sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonpos : (∀x∈s, f x ≤ 0) → (s.sum f = 0 ↔ ∀x∈s, f x = 0) :=
@sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg _ (order_dual β) _ _ _
lemma single_le_sum (hf : ∀x∈s, 0 ≤ f x) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ≤ s.sum f :=
have (singleton a).sum f ≤ s.sum f,
from sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg
(λ x e, (mem_singleton.1 e).symm ▸ h) (λ x h _, hf x h),
by rwa sum_singleton at this
end ordered_comm_monoid
section canonically_ordered_monoid
variables [canonically_ordered_monoid β]
lemma sum_le_sum_of_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.sum f ≤ s₂.sum f :=
sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg h $ assume x h₁ h₂, zero_le _
lemma sum_le_sum_of_ne_zero (h : ∀x∈s₁, f x ≠ 0 → x ∈ s₂) :
s₁.sum f ≤ s₂.sum f :=
by classical;
calc s₁.sum f = (s₁.filter (λx, f x = 0)).sum f + (s₁.filter (λx, f x ≠ 0)).sum f :
by rw [←sum_union, filter_union_filter_neg_eq];
exact disjoint_filter.2 (assume _ _ h n_h, n_h h)
... ≤ s₂.sum f : add_le_of_nonpos_of_le'
(sum_nonpos $ by simp only [mem_filter, and_imp]; exact λ _ _, le_of_eq)
(sum_le_sum_of_subset $ by simpa only [subset_iff, mem_filter, and_imp])
end canonically_ordered_monoid
section ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_cancel_comm_monoid β]
theorem sum_lt_sum (Hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) (Hlt : ∃ i ∈ s, f i < g i) :
s.sum f < s.sum g :=
begin
classical,
rcases Hlt with ⟨i, hi, hlt⟩,
rw [← insert_erase hi, sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _)],
exact add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hlt (sum_le_sum $ λ j hj, Hle j $ mem_of_mem_erase hj)
end
lemma sum_lt_sum_of_subset [decidable_eq α]
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) {i : α} (hi : i ∈ s₂ \ s₁) (hpos : 0 < f i) (hnonneg : ∀ j ∈ s₂ \ s₁, 0 ≤ f j) :
s₁.sum f < s₂.sum f :=
calc s₁.sum f < (insert i s₁).sum f :
begin
simp only [mem_sdiff] at hi,
rw sum_insert hi.2,
exact lt_add_of_pos_left (finset.sum s₁ f) hpos,
end
... ≤ s₂.sum f :
begin
simp only [mem_sdiff] at hi,
apply sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg,
{ simp [finset.insert_subset, h, hi.1] },
{ assume x hx h'x,
apply hnonneg x,
simp [mem_insert, not_or_distrib] at h'x,
rw mem_sdiff,
simp [hx, h'x] }
end
end ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
section decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
variables [decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid β]
theorem exists_le_of_sum_le (hs : s.nonempty) (Hle : s.sum f ≤ s.sum g) :
∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i :=
begin
classical,
contrapose! Hle with Hlt,
rcases hs with ⟨i, hi⟩,
exact sum_lt_sum (λ i hi, le_of_lt (Hlt i hi)) ⟨i, hi, Hlt i hi⟩
end
end decidable_linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
section linear_ordered_comm_ring
variables [decidable_eq α] [linear_ordered_comm_ring β]
/- this is also true for a ordered commutative multiplicative monoid -/
lemma prod_nonneg {s : finset α} {f : α → β}
(h0 : ∀(x ∈ s), 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ s.prod f :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ simp [zero_le_one] },
{ simp [has], apply mul_nonneg, apply h0 a (mem_insert_self a s),
exact ih (λ x H, h0 x (mem_insert_of_mem H)) }
end
/- this is also true for a ordered commutative multiplicative monoid -/
lemma prod_pos {s : finset α} {f : α → β} (h0 : ∀(x ∈ s), 0 < f x) : 0 < s.prod f :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ simp [zero_lt_one] },
{ simp [has], apply mul_pos, apply h0 a (mem_insert_self a s),
exact ih (λ x H, h0 x (mem_insert_of_mem H)) }
end
/- this is also true for a ordered commutative multiplicative monoid -/
lemma prod_le_prod {s : finset α} {f g : α → β} (h0 : ∀(x ∈ s), 0 ≤ f x)
(h1 : ∀(x ∈ s), f x ≤ g x) : s.prod f ≤ s.prod g :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ simp },
{ simp [has], apply mul_le_mul,
exact h1 a (mem_insert_self a s),
apply ih (λ x H, h0 _ _) (λ x H, h1 _ _); exact (mem_insert_of_mem H),
apply prod_nonneg (λ x H, h0 x (mem_insert_of_mem H)),
apply le_trans (h0 a (mem_insert_self a s)) (h1 a (mem_insert_self a s)) }
end
end linear_ordered_comm_ring
section canonically_ordered_comm_semiring
variables [decidable_eq α] [canonically_ordered_comm_semiring β]
lemma prod_le_prod' {s : finset α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) :
s.prod f ≤ s.prod g :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ simp },
{ rw [finset.prod_insert has, finset.prod_insert has],
apply canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul,
{ exact h _ (finset.mem_insert_self a s) },
{ exact ih (λ i hi, h _ (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) } }
end
end canonically_ordered_comm_semiring
@[simp] lemma card_pi [decidable_eq α] {δ : α → Type*}
(s : finset α) (t : Π a, finset (δ a)) :
(s.pi t).card = s.prod (λ a, card (t a)) :=
multiset.card_pi _ _
theorem card_le_mul_card_image [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (s : finset α)
(n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ a ∈ s.image f, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card ≤ n) :
s.card ≤ n * (s.image f).card :=
calc s.card = (s.image f).sum (λ a, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card) :
card_eq_sum_card_image _ _
... ≤ (s.image f).sum (λ _, n) : sum_le_sum hn
... = _ : by simp [mul_comm]
@[simp] lemma prod_Ico_id_eq_fact : ∀ n : ℕ, (Ico 1 n.succ).prod (λ x, x) = nat.fact n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [prod_Ico_succ_top $ nat.succ_le_succ $ zero_le n,
nat.fact_succ, prod_Ico_id_eq_fact n, nat.succ_eq_add_one, mul_comm]
end finset
namespace finset
section gauss_sum
/-- Gauss' summation formula -/
lemma sum_range_id_mul_two :
∀(n : ℕ), (finset.range n).sum (λi, i) * 2 = n * (n - 1)
| 0 := rfl
| 1 := rfl
| ((n + 1) + 1) :=
begin
rw [sum_range_succ, add_mul, sum_range_id_mul_two (n + 1), mul_comm, two_mul,
nat.add_sub_cancel, nat.add_sub_cancel, mul_comm _ n],
simp only [add_mul, one_mul, add_comm, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
end
/-- Gauss' summation formula -/
lemma sum_range_id (n : ℕ) : (finset.range n).sum (λi, i) = (n * (n - 1)) / 2 :=
by rw [← sum_range_id_mul_two n, nat.mul_div_cancel]; exact dec_trivial
end gauss_sum
lemma card_eq_sum_ones (s : finset α) : s.card = s.sum (λ _, 1) :=
by simp
end finset
section group
open list
variables [group α] [group β]
theorem is_group_anti_hom.map_prod (f : α → β) [is_group_anti_hom f] (l : list α) :
f (prod l) = prod (map f (reverse l)) :=
by induction l with hd tl ih; [exact is_group_anti_hom.map_one f,
simp only [prod_cons, is_group_anti_hom.map_mul f, ih, reverse_cons, map_append, prod_append, map_singleton, prod_cons, prod_nil, mul_one]]
theorem inv_prod : ∀ l : list α, (prod l)⁻¹ = prod (map (λ x, x⁻¹) (reverse l)) :=
λ l, @is_group_anti_hom.map_prod _ _ _ _ _ inv_is_group_anti_hom l -- TODO there is probably a cleaner proof of this
end group
@[to_additive is_add_group_hom_finset_sum]
lemma is_group_hom_finset_prod {α β γ} [group α] [comm_group β] (s : finset γ)
(f : γ → α → β) [∀c, is_group_hom (f c)] : is_group_hom (λa, s.prod (λc, f c a)) :=
{ map_mul := assume a b, by simp only [λc, is_mul_hom.map_mul (f c), finset.prod_mul_distrib] }
attribute [instance] is_group_hom_finset_prod is_add_group_hom_finset_sum
namespace multiset
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma to_finset_sum_count_eq (s : multiset α) :
s.to_finset.sum (λa, s.count a) = s.card :=
multiset.induction_on s rfl
(assume a s ih,
calc (to_finset (a :: s)).sum (λx, count x (a :: s)) =
(to_finset (a :: s)).sum (λx, (if x = a then 1 else 0) + count x s) :
finset.sum_congr rfl $ λ _ _, by split_ifs;
[simp only [h, count_cons_self, nat.one_add], simp only [count_cons_of_ne h, zero_add]]
... = card (a :: s) :
begin
by_cases a ∈ s.to_finset,
{ have : (to_finset s).sum (λx, ite (x = a) 1 0) = (finset.singleton a).sum (λx, ite (x = a) 1 0),
{ apply (finset.sum_subset _ _).symm,
{ intros _ H, rwa mem_singleton.1 H },
{ exact λ _ _ H, if_neg (mt finset.mem_singleton.2 H) } },
rw [to_finset_cons, finset.insert_eq_of_mem h, finset.sum_add_distrib, ih, this, finset.sum_singleton, if_pos rfl, add_comm, card_cons] },
{ have ha : a ∉ s, by rwa mem_to_finset at h,
have : (to_finset s).sum (λx, ite (x = a) 1 0) = (to_finset s).sum (λx, 0), from
finset.sum_congr rfl (λ x hx, if_neg $ by rintro rfl; cc),
rw [to_finset_cons, finset.sum_insert h, if_pos rfl, finset.sum_add_distrib, this, finset.sum_const_zero, ih, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem ha, zero_add, add_comm, card_cons] }
end)
end multiset
namespace with_top
open finset
variables [decidable_eq α]
/-- sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top [ordered_comm_monoid β] {s : finset α} {f : α → with_top β} :
(∀a∈s, f a < ⊤) → s.sum f < ⊤ :=
finset.induction_on s (by { intro h, rw sum_empty, exact coe_lt_top _ })
(λa s ha ih h,
begin
rw [sum_insert ha, add_lt_top], split,
{ apply h, apply mem_insert_self },
{ apply ih, intros a ha, apply h, apply mem_insert_of_mem ha }
end)
/-- sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top_iff [canonically_ordered_monoid β] {s : finset α} {f : α → with_top β} :
s.sum f < ⊤ ↔ (∀a∈s, f a < ⊤) :=
iff.intro (λh a ha, lt_of_le_of_lt (single_le_sum (λa ha, zero_le _) ha) h) sum_lt_top
end with_top
|
367a3f8b14a775caf01bd193cd720c9c1b5daad2 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/structuralIssue2.lean | ea1a6fe2e7ebcf9bc43f79adf8e57088f9cc6a48 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 704 | lean | namespace List
@[simp] theorem filter_nil {p : α → Bool} : filter p [] = [] := by
simp!
theorem cons_eq_append (a : α) (as : List α) : a :: as = [a] ++ as := rfl
theorem filter_cons (a : α) (as : List α) :
filter p (a :: as) = if p a then a :: filter p as else filter p as :=
sorry
@[simp] theorem filter_append {as bs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
filter p (as ++ bs) = filter p as ++ filter p bs :=
match as with
| [] => by simp
| a :: as => by
rw [filter_cons, cons_append, filter_cons]
cases p a
simp [filter_append]
simp [filter_append]
-- the previous contains a more complicated version of
def f : Nat → Nat
| 0 => 1
| i+1 => (fun x => f x) i
|
4fdcdff92230dc9a66c321aa14b49549d00c8830 | 5ae26df177f810c5006841e9c73dc56e01b978d7 | /src/data/nat/basic.lean | 6d28b8ace74c3d20e29f5a42ff7dec8bbe074ffc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/mathlib | 98322577c460bc6b1fe5c21f42ce33ad1c3e5558 | a2a867e827c2a6702beb9efc2b9282bd801d5f9a | refs/heads/master | 1,583,848,251,477 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 129,409,993 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,565,164,817,000 | 1,523,628,059,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 47,562 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
Basic operations on the natural numbers.
-/
import logic.basic algebra.ordered_ring data.option.basic
universes u v
namespace nat
variables {m n k : ℕ}
-- Sometimes a bare `nat.add` or similar appears as a consequence of unfolding
-- during pattern matching. These lemmas package them back up as typeclass
-- mediated operations.
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b : ℕ} : nat.add a b = a + b := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b : ℕ} : nat.mul a b = a * b := rfl
attribute [simp] nat.add_sub_cancel nat.add_sub_cancel_left
attribute [simp] nat.sub_self
theorem succ_inj' {n m : ℕ} : succ n = succ m ↔ n = m :=
⟨succ_inj, congr_arg _⟩
theorem succ_le_succ_iff {m n : ℕ} : succ m ≤ succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ⟩
lemma zero_max {m : nat} : max 0 m = m :=
max_eq_right (zero_le _)
theorem max_succ_succ {m n : ℕ} :
max (succ m) (succ n) = succ (max m n) :=
begin
by_cases h1 : m ≤ n,
rw [max_eq_right h1, max_eq_right (succ_le_succ h1)],
{ rw not_le at h1, have h2 := le_of_lt h1,
rw [max_eq_left h2, max_eq_left (succ_le_succ h2)] }
end
lemma not_succ_lt_self {n : ℕ} : ¬succ n < n :=
not_lt_of_ge (nat.le_succ _)
theorem lt_succ_iff {m n : ℕ} : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
succ_le_succ_iff
lemma succ_le_iff {m n : ℕ} : succ m ≤ n ↔ m < n :=
⟨lt_of_succ_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma lt_iff_add_one_le {m n : ℕ} : m < n ↔ m + 1 ≤ n :=
by rw succ_le_iff
theorem of_le_succ {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m.succ) : n ≤ m ∨ n = m.succ :=
(lt_or_eq_of_le H).imp le_of_lt_succ id
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def le_rec_on {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n : ℕ} : Π {m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → (Π {k}, C k → C (k+1)) → C n → C m
| 0 H next x := eq.rec_on (eq_zero_of_le_zero H) x
| (m+1) H next x := or.by_cases (of_le_succ H) (λ h : n ≤ m, next $ le_rec_on h @next x) (λ h : n = m + 1, eq.rec_on h x)
theorem le_rec_on_self {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n} {h : n ≤ n} {next} (x : C n) : (le_rec_on h next x : C n) = x :=
by cases n; unfold le_rec_on or.by_cases; rw [dif_neg n.not_succ_le_self, dif_pos rfl]
theorem le_rec_on_succ {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (h1 : n ≤ m) {h2 : n ≤ m+1} {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h2 @next x : C (m+1)) = next (le_rec_on h1 @next x : C m) :=
by conv { to_lhs, rw [le_rec_on, or.by_cases, dif_pos h1] }
theorem le_rec_on_succ' {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n} {h : n ≤ n+1} {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h next x : C (n+1)) = next x :=
by rw [le_rec_on_succ (le_refl n), le_rec_on_self]
theorem le_rec_on_trans {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m k} (hnm : n ≤ m) (hmk : m ≤ k) {next} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on (le_trans hnm hmk) @next x : C k) = le_rec_on hmk @next (le_rec_on hnm @next x) :=
begin
induction hmk with k hmk ih, { rw le_rec_on_self },
rw [le_rec_on_succ (le_trans hnm hmk), ih, le_rec_on_succ]
end
theorem le_rec_on_succ_left {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (h1 : n ≤ m) (h2 : n+1 ≤ m)
{next : Π{{k}}, C k → C (k+1)} (x : C n) :
(le_rec_on h2 next (next x) : C m) = (le_rec_on h1 next x : C m) :=
begin
rw [subsingleton.elim h1 (le_trans (le_succ n) h2),
le_rec_on_trans (le_succ n) h2, le_rec_on_succ']
end
theorem le_rec_on_injective {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (hnm : n ≤ m)
(next : Π n, C n → C (n+1)) (Hnext : ∀ n, function.injective (next n)) :
function.injective (le_rec_on hnm next) :=
begin
induction hnm with m hnm ih, { intros x y H, rwa [le_rec_on_self, le_rec_on_self] at H },
intros x y H, rw [le_rec_on_succ hnm, le_rec_on_succ hnm] at H, exact ih (Hnext _ H)
end
theorem le_rec_on_surjective {C : ℕ → Sort u} {n m} (hnm : n ≤ m)
(next : Π n, C n → C (n+1)) (Hnext : ∀ n, function.surjective (next n)) :
function.surjective (le_rec_on hnm next) :=
begin
induction hnm with m hnm ih, { intros x, use x, rw le_rec_on_self },
intros x, rcases Hnext _ x with ⟨w, rfl⟩, rcases ih w with ⟨x, rfl⟩, use x, rw le_rec_on_succ
end
theorem pred_eq_of_eq_succ {m n : ℕ} (H : m = n.succ) : m.pred = n := by simp [H]
theorem pred_sub (n m : ℕ) : pred n - m = pred (n - m) :=
by rw [← sub_one, nat.sub_sub, one_add]; refl
lemma pred_eq_sub_one (n : ℕ) : pred n = n - 1 := rfl
lemma one_le_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : 1 ≤ m :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nat.zero_le _) h
lemma le_pred_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : m < n) : m ≤ n - 1 :=
nat.sub_le_sub_right h 1
/-- This ensures that `simp` succeeds on `pred (n + 1) = n`. -/
@[simp] lemma pred_one_add (n : ℕ) : pred (1 + n) = n :=
by rw [add_comm, add_one, pred_succ]
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero : n > 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨ne_of_gt, nat.pos_of_ne_zero⟩
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' : 0 < n ↔ n ≠ 0 := pos_iff_ne_zero
lemma one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 1 < n ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ n ≠ 1
| 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 := dec_trivial
| (n+2) := dec_trivial
theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt {a b : ℕ} (h1 : a < b + 1) (h2 : ¬ a < b) : a = b :=
have h3 : a ≤ b, from le_of_lt_succ h1,
or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_not_lt h2) (λ h, h) (λ h, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge h3))
protected theorem le_sub_add (n m : ℕ) : n ≤ n - m + m :=
or.elim (le_total n m)
(assume : n ≤ m, begin rw [sub_eq_zero_of_le this, zero_add], exact this end)
(assume : m ≤ n, begin rw (nat.sub_add_cancel this) end)
theorem sub_add_eq_max (n m : ℕ) : n - m + m = max n m :=
eq_max (nat.le_sub_add _ _) (le_add_left _ _) $ λ k h₁ h₂,
by rw ← nat.sub_add_cancel h₂; exact
add_le_add_right (nat.sub_le_sub_right h₁ _) _
theorem sub_add_min (n m : ℕ) : n - m + min n m = n :=
(le_total n m).elim
(λ h, by rw [min_eq_left h, sub_eq_zero_of_le h, zero_add])
(λ h, by rw [min_eq_right h, nat.sub_add_cancel h])
protected theorem add_sub_cancel' {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≥ m) : m + (n - m) = n :=
by rw [add_comm, nat.sub_add_cancel h]
protected theorem sub_eq_of_eq_add (h : k = m + n) : k - m = n :=
begin rw [h, nat.add_sub_cancel_left] end
theorem sub_cancel {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : a ≤ c) (w : b - a = c - a) : b = c :=
by rw [←nat.sub_add_cancel h₁, ←nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, w]
lemma sub_sub_sub_cancel_right {a b c : ℕ} (h₂ : c ≤ b) : (a - c) - (b - c) = a - b :=
by rw [nat.sub_sub, ←nat.add_sub_assoc h₂, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
lemma add_sub_cancel_right (n m k : ℕ) : n + (m + k) - k = n + m :=
by { rw [nat.add_sub_assoc, nat.add_sub_cancel], apply k.le_add_left }
protected lemma sub_add_eq_add_sub {a b c : ℕ} (h : b ≤ a) : (a - b) + c = (a + c) - b :=
by rw [add_comm a, nat.add_sub_assoc h, add_comm]
theorem sub_min (n m : ℕ) : n - min n m = n - m :=
nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add $ by rw [add_comm, sub_add_min]
protected theorem lt_of_sub_pos (h : n - m > 0) : m < n :=
lt_of_not_ge
(assume : m ≥ n,
have n - m = 0, from sub_eq_zero_of_le this,
begin rw this at h, exact lt_irrefl _ h end)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right : m - k < n - k → m < n :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h, nat.sub_le_sub_right h _)
protected theorem lt_of_sub_lt_sub_left : m - n < m - k → k < n :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (nat.sub_le_sub_left _)
protected theorem sub_lt_self (h₁ : m > 0) (h₂ : n > 0) : m - n < m :=
calc
m - n = succ (pred m) - succ (pred n) : by rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁, succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₂]
... = pred m - pred n : by rw succ_sub_succ
... ≤ pred m : sub_le _ _
... < succ (pred m) : lt_succ_self _
... = m : succ_pred_eq_of_pos h₁
protected theorem le_sub_right_of_add_le (h : m + k ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
by rw ← nat.add_sub_cancel m k; exact nat.sub_le_sub_right h k
protected theorem le_sub_left_of_add_le (h : k + m ≤ n) : m ≤ n - k :=
nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le (by rwa add_comm at h)
protected theorem lt_sub_right_of_add_lt (h : m + k < n) : m < n - k :=
lt_of_succ_le $ nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le $
by rw succ_add; exact succ_le_of_lt h
protected theorem lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (h : k + m < n) : m < n - k :=
nat.lt_sub_right_of_add_lt (by rwa add_comm at h)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_right (h : m < n - k) : m + k < n :=
@nat.lt_of_sub_lt_sub_right _ _ k (by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_left (h : m < n - k) : k + m < n :=
by rw add_comm; exact nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right h
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_le_right : n - k ≤ m → n ≤ m + k :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.lt_sub_right_of_add_lt
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_le_left : n - k ≤ m → n ≤ k + m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_right : n - k < m → n < m + k :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le nat.le_sub_right_of_add_le
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_lt_left : n - k < m → n < k + m :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le
protected theorem sub_le_left_of_le_add : n ≤ k + m → n - k ≤ m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left
protected theorem sub_le_right_of_le_add : n ≤ m + k → n - k ≤ m :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right
protected theorem sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add (H : n ≤ k) : k - n < m ↔ k < n + m :=
⟨nat.lt_add_of_sub_lt_left,
λ h₁,
have succ k ≤ n + m, from succ_le_of_lt h₁,
have succ (k - n) ≤ m, from
calc succ (k - n) = succ k - n : by rw (succ_sub H)
... ≤ n + m - n : nat.sub_le_sub_right this n
... = m : by rw nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
lt_of_succ_le this⟩
protected theorem le_sub_left_iff_add_le (H : m ≤ k) : n ≤ k - m ↔ m + n ≤ k :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 (nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add H)
protected theorem le_sub_right_iff_add_le (H : n ≤ k) : m ≤ k - n ↔ m + n ≤ k :=
by rw [nat.le_sub_left_iff_add_le H, add_comm]
protected theorem lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt : n < k - m ↔ m + n < k :=
⟨nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left, nat.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt⟩
protected theorem lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt : m < k - n ↔ m + n < k :=
by rw [nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt, add_comm]
theorem sub_le_left_iff_le_add : m - n ≤ k ↔ m ≤ n + k :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 nat.lt_sub_left_iff_add_lt
theorem sub_le_right_iff_le_add : m - k ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n + k :=
by rw [nat.sub_le_left_iff_le_add, add_comm]
protected theorem sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add (H : k ≤ m) : m - k < n ↔ m < n + k :=
by rw [nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add H, add_comm]
protected theorem sub_le_sub_left_iff (H : k ≤ m) : m - n ≤ m - k ↔ k ≤ n :=
⟨λ h,
have k + (m - k) - n ≤ m - k, by rwa nat.add_sub_cancel' H,
nat.le_of_add_le_add_right (nat.le_add_of_sub_le_left this),
nat.sub_le_sub_left _⟩
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_right_iff (H : k ≤ m) : m - k < n - k ↔ m < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff _ _ _ H)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_left_iff (H : n ≤ m) : m - n < m - k ↔ k < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (nat.sub_le_sub_left_iff H)
protected theorem sub_le_iff : m - n ≤ k ↔ m - k ≤ n :=
nat.sub_le_left_iff_le_add.trans nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add.symm
protected lemma sub_le_self (n m : ℕ) : n - m ≤ n :=
nat.sub_le_left_of_le_add (nat.le_add_left _ _)
protected theorem sub_lt_iff (h₁ : n ≤ m) (h₂ : k ≤ m) : m - n < k ↔ m - k < n :=
(nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add h₁).trans (nat.sub_lt_right_iff_lt_add h₂).symm
lemma pred_le_iff {n m : ℕ} : pred n ≤ m ↔ n ≤ succ m :=
@nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add n m 1
lemma lt_pred_iff {n m : ℕ} : n < pred m ↔ succ n < m :=
@nat.lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt n 1 m
protected theorem mul_ne_zero {n m : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) (m0 : m ≠ 0) : n * m ≠ 0
| nm := (eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero nm).elim n0 m0
@[simp] protected theorem mul_eq_zero {a b : ℕ} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
iff.intro eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero (by simp [or_imp_distrib] {contextual := tt})
@[simp] protected theorem zero_eq_mul {a b : ℕ} : 0 = a * b ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
by rw [eq_comm, nat.mul_eq_zero]
lemma eq_zero_of_double_le {a : ℕ} (h : 2 * a ≤ a) : a = 0 :=
nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $
by rwa [two_mul, nat.add_le_to_le_sub, nat.sub_self] at h; refl
lemma eq_zero_of_mul_le {a b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (h : b * a ≤ a) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_double_le $ le_trans (nat.mul_le_mul_right _ hb) h
lemma le_mul_of_pos_left {m n : ℕ} (h : n > 0) : m ≤ n * m :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← one_mul(m)]},
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (nat.succ_le_of_lt h) dec_trivial,
end
lemma le_mul_of_pos_right {m n : ℕ} (h : n > 0) : m ≤ m * n :=
begin
conv {to_lhs, rw [← mul_one(m)]},
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (nat.succ_le_of_lt h) dec_trivial,
end
theorem two_mul_ne_two_mul_add_one {n m} : 2 * n ≠ 2 * m + 1 :=
mt (congr_arg (%2)) (by rw [add_comm, add_mul_mod_self_left, mul_mod_right]; exact dec_trivial)
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected def strong_rec' {p : ℕ → Sort u} (H : ∀ n, (∀ m, m < n → p m) → p n) : ∀ (n : ℕ), p n
| n := H n (λ m hm, strong_rec' m)
attribute [simp] nat.div_self
protected lemma div_le_of_le_mul' {m n : ℕ} {k} (h : m ≤ k * n) : m / k ≤ n :=
(eq_zero_or_pos k).elim
(λ k0, by rw [k0, nat.div_zero]; apply zero_le)
(λ k0, (decidable.mul_le_mul_left k0).1 $
calc k * (m / k)
≤ m % k + k * (m / k) : le_add_left _ _
... = m : mod_add_div _ _
... ≤ k * n : h)
protected lemma div_le_self' (m n : ℕ) : m / n ≤ m :=
(eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λ n0, by rw [n0, nat.div_zero]; apply zero_le)
(λ n0, nat.div_le_of_le_mul' $ calc
m = 1 * m : (one_mul _).symm
... ≤ n * m : mul_le_mul_right _ n0)
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le' {x y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : 0 < k) : x ≤ y / k ↔ x * k ≤ y :=
begin
revert x, refine nat.strong_rec' _ y,
clear y, intros y IH x,
cases decidable.lt_or_le y k with h h,
{ rw [div_eq_of_lt h],
cases x with x,
{ simp [zero_mul, zero_le] },
{ rw succ_mul,
exact iff_of_false (not_succ_le_zero _)
(not_le_of_lt $ lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_left _ _)) } },
{ rw [div_eq_sub_div k0 h],
cases x with x,
{ simp [zero_mul, zero_le] },
{ rw [← add_one, nat.add_le_add_iff_le_right, succ_mul,
IH _ (sub_lt_of_pos_le _ _ k0 h), add_le_to_le_sub _ h] } }
end
theorem div_mul_le_self' (m n : ℕ) : m / n * n ≤ m :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos n).elim (λ n0, by simp [n0, zero_le]) $ λ n0,
(le_div_iff_mul_le' n0).1 (le_refl _)
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul' {x y : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : 0 < k) : x / k < y ↔ x < y * k :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_mul_le' k0
protected theorem div_le_div_right {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) {k : ℕ} : n / k ≤ m / k :=
(nat.eq_zero_or_pos k).elim (λ k0, by simp [k0]) $ λ hk,
(le_div_iff_mul_le' hk).2 $ le_trans (nat.div_mul_le_self' _ _) h
lemma lt_of_div_lt_div {m n k : ℕ} (h : m / k < n / k) : m < n :=
by_contradiction $ λ h₁, absurd h (not_lt_of_ge (nat.div_le_div_right (not_lt.1 h₁)))
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : ℕ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c :=
by rw [← H2, nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : ℕ} (H : b > 0) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
⟨nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℕ} (H : b > 0) (H' : b ∣ a) :
a / b = c ↔ a = c * b :=
by rw mul_comm; exact nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_left {a b c : ℕ} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H1 H2]
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left' {a b : ℕ} (Hd : a ∣ b) : a * (b / a) = b :=
by rw [mul_comm,nat.div_mul_cancel Hd]
protected theorem div_mod_unique {n k m d : ℕ} (h : 0 < k) :
n / k = d ∧ n % k = m ↔ m + k * d = n ∧ m < k :=
⟨λ ⟨e₁, e₂⟩, e₁ ▸ e₂ ▸ ⟨mod_add_div _ _, mod_lt _ h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁ ▸ by rw [add_mul_div_left _ _ h, add_mul_mod_self_left];
simp [div_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt, h₂]⟩
lemma two_mul_odd_div_two {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 2 = 1) : 2 * (n / 2) = n - 1 :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← nat.mod_add_div n 2, hn, nat.add_sub_cancel_left]}
lemma div_dvd_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (h : b ∣ a) : (a / b) ∣ a :=
⟨b, (nat.div_mul_cancel h).symm⟩
protected lemma div_pos {a b : ℕ} (hba : b ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b :=
nat.pos_of_ne_zero (λ h, lt_irrefl a
(calc a = a % b : by simpa [h] using (mod_add_div a b).symm
... < b : nat.mod_lt a hb
... ≤ a : hba))
protected theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : ℕ} (ha : a > 0) : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right ha, λ e, e ▸ rfl⟩
protected theorem mul_left_inj {a b c : ℕ} (ha : a > 0) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left ha, λ e, e ▸ rfl⟩
protected lemma div_div_self : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, b ∣ a → 0 < a → a / (a / b) = b
| a 0 h₁ h₂ := by rw eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁; refl
| 0 b h₁ h₂ := absurd h₂ dec_trivial
| (a+1) (b+1) h₁ h₂ :=
(nat.mul_right_inj (nat.div_pos (le_of_dvd (succ_pos a) h₁) (succ_pos b))).1 $
by rw [nat.div_mul_cancel (div_dvd_of_dvd h₁), nat.mul_div_cancel' h₁]
protected lemma div_lt_of_lt_mul {m n k : ℕ} (h : m < n * k) : m / n < k :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
(calc n * (m / n) ≤ m % n + n * (m / n) : nat.le_add_left _ _
... = m : mod_add_div _ _
... < n * k : h)
(nat.zero_le n)
lemma lt_mul_of_div_lt {a b c : ℕ} (h : a / c < b) (w : 0 < c) : a < b * c :=
lt_of_not_ge $ not_le_of_gt h ∘ (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ w).2
protected lemma div_eq_zero_iff {a b : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) : a / b = 0 ↔ a < b :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← mod_add_div a b, h, mul_zero, add_zero]; exact mod_lt _ hb,
λ h, by rw [← nat.mul_left_inj hb, ← @add_left_cancel_iff _ _ (a % b), mod_add_div,
mod_eq_of_lt h, mul_zero, add_zero]⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_le_div {a b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ a / b) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_mul_le hb $
by rw mul_comm; exact (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le' (lt_of_lt_of_le dec_trivial hb)).1 h
lemma eq_zero_of_le_half {a : ℕ} (h : a ≤ a / 2) : a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_le_div (le_refl _) h
lemma mod_mul_right_div_self (a b c : ℕ) : a % (b * c) / b = (a / b) % c :=
if hb : b = 0 then by simp [hb] else if hc : c = 0 then by simp [hc]
else by conv {to_rhs, rw ← mod_add_div a (b * c)};
rw [mul_assoc, nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb), add_mul_mod_self_left,
mod_eq_of_lt (nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (mod_lt _ (mul_pos (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb) (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc))))]
lemma mod_mul_left_div_self (a b c : ℕ) : a % (c * b) / b = (a / b) % c :=
by rw [mul_comm c, mod_mul_right_div_self]
@[simp] protected theorem dvd_one {n : ℕ} : n ∣ 1 ↔ n = 1 :=
⟨eq_one_of_dvd_one, λ e, e.symm ▸ dvd_refl _⟩
protected theorem dvd_add_left {k m n : ℕ} (h : k ∣ n) : k ∣ m + n ↔ k ∣ m :=
(nat.dvd_add_iff_left h).symm
protected theorem dvd_add_right {k m n : ℕ} (h : k ∣ m) : k ∣ m + n ↔ k ∣ n :=
(nat.dvd_add_iff_right h).symm
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_left {a b c : ℕ} (ha : a > 0) : a * b ∣ a * c ↔ b ∣ c :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_assoc, nat.mul_left_inj ha]
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_right {a b c : ℕ} (hc : c > 0) : a * c ∣ b * c ↔ a ∣ b :=
exists_congr $ λ d, by rw [mul_right_comm, nat.mul_right_inj hc]
@[simp] theorem mod_mod (a n : ℕ) : (a % n) % n = a % n :=
(eq_zero_or_pos n).elim
(λ n0, by simp [n0])
(λ npos, mod_eq_of_lt (mod_lt _ npos))
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (n : nat) {m k : nat} (h : m ∣ k) : n % k % m = n % m :=
begin
conv { to_rhs, rw ←mod_add_div n k },
rcases h with ⟨t, rfl⟩, rw [mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
end
theorem add_pos_left {m : ℕ} (h : m > 0) (n : ℕ) : m + n > 0 :=
calc
m + n > 0 + n : nat.add_lt_add_right h n
... = n : nat.zero_add n
... ≥ 0 : zero_le n
theorem add_pos_right (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : n > 0) : m + n > 0 :=
begin rw add_comm, exact add_pos_left h m end
theorem add_pos_iff_pos_or_pos (m n : ℕ) : m + n > 0 ↔ m > 0 ∨ n > 0 :=
iff.intro
begin
intro h,
cases m with m,
{simp [zero_add] at h, exact or.inr h},
exact or.inl (succ_pos _)
end
begin
intro h, cases h with mpos npos,
{ apply add_pos_left mpos },
apply add_pos_right _ npos
end
lemma add_eq_one_iff : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, a + b = 1 ↔ (a = 0 ∧ b = 1) ∨ (a = 1 ∧ b = 0)
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 1 := dec_trivial
| 1 0 := dec_trivial
| 1 1 := dec_trivial
| (a+2) _ := by rw add_right_comm; exact dec_trivial
| _ (b+2) := by rw [← add_assoc]; simp only [nat.succ_inj', nat.succ_ne_zero]; simp
lemma mul_eq_one_iff : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, a * b = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∧ b = 1
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 1 := dec_trivial
| 1 0 := dec_trivial
| (a+2) 0 := by simp
| 0 (b+2) := by simp
| (a+1) (b+1) := ⟨λ h, by simp only [add_mul, mul_add, mul_add, one_mul, mul_one,
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm, nat.succ_inj', add_eq_zero_iff] at h; simp [h.1.2, h.2],
by clear_aux_decl; finish⟩
lemma mul_right_eq_self_iff {a b : ℕ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 :=
suffices a * b = a * 1 ↔ b = 1, by rwa mul_one at this,
nat.mul_left_inj ha
lemma mul_left_eq_self_iff {a b : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 :=
by rw [mul_comm, nat.mul_right_eq_self_iff hb]
lemma lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq {n i : ℕ} : n < i.succ ↔ (n < i ∨ n = i) :=
lt_succ_iff.trans le_iff_lt_or_eq
theorem le_zero_iff {i : ℕ} : i ≤ 0 ↔ i = 0 :=
⟨nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, assume h, h ▸ le_refl i⟩
theorem le_add_one_iff {i j : ℕ} : i ≤ j + 1 ↔ (i ≤ j ∨ i = j + 1) :=
⟨assume h,
match nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h with
| or.inl h := or.inr h
| or.inr h := or.inl $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h
end,
or.rec (assume h, le_trans h $ nat.le_add_right _ _) le_of_eq⟩
theorem mul_self_inj {n m : ℕ} : n * n = m * m ↔ n = m :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans (le_antisymm_iff.trans
(and_congr mul_self_le_mul_self_iff mul_self_le_mul_self_iff)).symm
instance decidable_ball_lt (n : nat) (P : Π k < n, Prop) :
∀ [H : ∀ n h, decidable (P n h)], decidable (∀ n h, P n h) :=
begin
induction n with n IH; intro; resetI,
{ exact is_true (λ n, dec_trivial) },
cases IH (λ k h, P k (lt_succ_of_lt h)) with h,
{ refine is_false (mt _ h), intros hn k h, apply hn },
by_cases p : P n (lt_succ_self n),
{ exact is_true (λ k h',
(lt_or_eq_of_le $ le_of_lt_succ h').elim (h _)
(λ e, match k, e, h' with _, rfl, h := p end)) },
{ exact is_false (mt (λ hn, hn _ _) p) }
end
instance decidable_forall_fin {n : ℕ} (P : fin n → Prop)
[H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀ i, P i) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ k h, P ⟨k, h⟩) ⟨λ a ⟨k, h⟩, a k h, λ a k h, a ⟨k, h⟩⟩
instance decidable_ball_le (n : ℕ) (P : Π k ≤ n, Prop)
[H : ∀ n h, decidable (P n h)] : decidable (∀ n h, P n h) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ k (h : k < succ n), P k (le_of_lt_succ h))
⟨λ a k h, a k (lt_succ_of_le h), λ a k h, a k _⟩
instance decidable_lo_hi (lo hi : ℕ) (P : ℕ → Prop) [H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀x, lo ≤ x → x < hi → P x) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ x < hi - lo, P (lo + x))
⟨λal x hl hh, by have := al (x - lo) (lt_of_not_ge $
(not_congr (nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff _ _ _ hl)).2 $ not_le_of_gt hh);
rwa [nat.add_sub_of_le hl] at this,
λal x h, al _ (nat.le_add_right _ _) (nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left h)⟩
instance decidable_lo_hi_le (lo hi : ℕ) (P : ℕ → Prop) [H : decidable_pred P] : decidable (∀x, lo ≤ x → x ≤ hi → P x) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀x, lo ≤ x → x < hi + 1 → P x) $
ball_congr $ λ x hl, imp_congr lt_succ_iff iff.rfl
protected theorem bit0_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : bit0 n ≤ bit0 m :=
add_le_add h h
protected theorem bit1_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : bit1 n ≤ bit1 m :=
succ_le_succ (add_le_add h h)
theorem bit_le : ∀ (b : bool) {n m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → bit b n ≤ bit b m
| tt n m h := nat.bit1_le h
| ff n m h := nat.bit0_le h
theorem bit_ne_zero (b) {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : bit b n ≠ 0 :=
by cases b; [exact nat.bit0_ne_zero h, exact nat.bit1_ne_zero _]
theorem bit0_le_bit : ∀ (b) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit0 m ≤ bit b n
| tt m n h := le_of_lt $ nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h
| ff m n h := nat.bit0_le h
theorem bit_le_bit1 : ∀ (b) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → bit b m ≤ bit1 n
| ff m n h := le_of_lt $ nat.bit0_lt_bit1 h
| tt m n h := nat.bit1_le h
theorem bit_lt_bit0 : ∀ (b) {n m : ℕ}, n < m → bit b n < bit0 m
| tt n m h := nat.bit1_lt_bit0 h
| ff n m h := nat.bit0_lt h
theorem bit_lt_bit (a b) {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : bit a n < bit b m :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (bit_lt_bit0 _ h) (bit0_le_bit _ (le_refl _))
/- partial subtraction -/
/-- Partial predecessor operation. Returns `ppred n = some m`
if `n = m + 1`, otherwise `none`. -/
@[simp] def ppred : ℕ → option ℕ
| 0 := none
| (n+1) := some n
/-- Partial subtraction operation. Returns `psub m n = some k`
if `m = n + k`, otherwise `none`. -/
@[simp] def psub (m : ℕ) : ℕ → option ℕ
| 0 := some m
| (n+1) := psub n >>= ppred
theorem pred_eq_ppred (n : ℕ) : pred n = (ppred n).get_or_else 0 :=
by cases n; refl
theorem sub_eq_psub (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, m - n = (psub m n).get_or_else 0
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := (pred_eq_ppred (m-n)).trans $
by rw [sub_eq_psub, psub]; cases psub m n; refl
@[simp] theorem ppred_eq_some {m : ℕ} : ∀ {n}, ppred n = some m ↔ succ m = n
| 0 := by split; intro h; contradiction
| (n+1) := by dsimp; split; intro h; injection h; subst n
@[simp] theorem ppred_eq_none : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ppred n = none ↔ n = 0
| 0 := by simp
| (n+1) := by dsimp; split; contradiction
theorem psub_eq_some {m : ℕ} : ∀ {n k}, psub m n = some k ↔ k + n = m
| 0 k := by simp [eq_comm]
| (n+1) k := by dsimp; apply option.bind_eq_some.trans; simp [psub_eq_some]
theorem psub_eq_none (m n : ℕ) : psub m n = none ↔ m < n :=
begin
cases s : psub m n; simp [eq_comm],
{ show m < n, refine lt_of_not_ge (λ h, _),
cases le.dest h with k e,
injection s.symm.trans (psub_eq_some.2 $ (add_comm _ _).trans e) },
{ show n ≤ m, rw ← psub_eq_some.1 s, apply le_add_left }
end
theorem ppred_eq_pred {n} (h : 0 < n) : ppred n = some (pred n) :=
ppred_eq_some.2 $ succ_pred_eq_of_pos h
theorem psub_eq_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : psub m n = some (m - n) :=
psub_eq_some.2 $ nat.sub_add_cancel h
theorem psub_add (m n k) : psub m (n + k) = do x ← psub m n, psub x k :=
by induction k; simp [*, add_succ, bind_assoc]
/- pow -/
attribute [simp] nat.pow_zero nat.pow_one
@[simp] lemma one_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, 1 ^ n = 1
| 0 := rfl
| (k+1) := show 1^k * 1 = 1, by rw [mul_one, one_pow]
theorem pow_add (a m n : ℕ) : a^(m + n) = a^m * a^n :=
by induction n; simp [*, pow_succ, mul_assoc]
theorem pow_two (a : ℕ) : a ^ 2 = a * a := show (1 * a) * a = _, by rw one_mul
theorem pow_dvd_pow (a : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : a^m ∣ a^n :=
by rw [← nat.add_sub_cancel' h, pow_add]; apply dvd_mul_right
theorem pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (h : a ∣ b) : ∀ n:ℕ, a^n ∣ b^n
| 0 := dvd_refl _
| (n+1) := mul_dvd_mul (pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd n) h
theorem mul_pow (a b n : ℕ) : (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [*, nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem pow_mul (a b n : ℕ) : n ^ (a * b) = (n ^ a) ^ b :=
by induction b; simp [*, nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.pow_add, mul_add, mul_comm]
theorem pow_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : p > 0) : ∀ n : ℕ, p ^ n > 0
| 0 := by simpa using zero_lt_one
| (k+1) := mul_pos (pow_pos _) hp
lemma pow_eq_mul_pow_sub (p : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : p ^ m * p ^ (n - m) = p ^ n :=
by rw [←nat.pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
lemma pow_lt_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (h : p > 1) (n : ℕ) : p^n < p^(n+1) :=
suffices p^n*1 < p^n*p, by simpa,
nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (nat.pow_pos (lt_of_succ_lt h) n)
lemma lt_pow_self {p : ℕ} (h : p > 1) : ∀ n : ℕ, n < p ^ n
| 0 := by simp [zero_lt_one]
| (n+1) := calc
n + 1 < p^n + 1 : nat.add_lt_add_right (lt_pow_self _) _
... ≤ p ^ (n+1) : pow_lt_pow_succ h _
lemma not_pos_pow_dvd : ∀ {p k : ℕ} (hp : p > 1) (hk : k > 1), ¬ p^k ∣ p
| (succ p) (succ k) hp hk h :=
have (succ p)^k * succ p ∣ 1 * succ p, by simpa,
have (succ p) ^ k ∣ 1, from dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (succ_pos _) this,
have he : (succ p) ^ k = 1, from eq_one_of_dvd_one this,
have k < (succ p) ^ k, from lt_pow_self hp k,
have k < 1, by rwa [he] at this,
have k = 0, from eq_zero_of_le_zero $ le_of_lt_succ this,
have 1 > 1, by rwa [this] at hk,
absurd this dec_trivial
@[simp] theorem bodd_div2_eq (n : ℕ) : bodd_div2 n = (bodd n, div2 n) :=
by unfold bodd div2; cases bodd_div2 n; refl
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit0 (n) : bodd (bit0 n) = ff := bodd_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma bodd_bit1 (n) : bodd (bit1 n) = tt := bodd_bit tt n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit0 (n) : div2 (bit0 n) = n := div2_bit ff n
@[simp] lemma div2_bit1 (n) : div2 (bit1 n) = n := div2_bit tt n
/- iterate -/
section
variables {α : Sort*} (op : α → α)
@[simp] theorem iterate_zero (a : α) : op^[0] a = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem iterate_succ (n : ℕ) (a : α) : op^[succ n] a = (op^[n]) (op a) := rfl
theorem iterate_add : ∀ (m n : ℕ) (a : α), op^[m + n] a = (op^[m]) (op^[n] a)
| m 0 a := rfl
| m (succ n) a := iterate_add m n _
theorem iterate_succ' (n : ℕ) (a : α) : op^[succ n] a = op (op^[n] a) :=
by rw [← one_add, iterate_add]; refl
theorem iterate₀ {α : Type u} {op : α → α} {x : α} (H : op x = x) {n : ℕ} :
op^[n] x = x :=
by induction n; [simp only [iterate_zero], simp only [iterate_succ', H, *]]
theorem iterate₁ {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {op : α → α} {op' : β → β} {op'' : α → β}
(H : ∀ x, op' (op'' x) = op'' (op x)) {n : ℕ} {x : α} :
op'^[n] (op'' x) = op'' (op^[n] x) :=
by induction n; [simp only [iterate_zero], simp only [iterate_succ', H, *]]
theorem iterate₂ {α : Type u} {op : α → α} {op' : α → α → α} (H : ∀ x y, op (op' x y) = op' (op x) (op y)) {n : ℕ} {x y : α} :
op^[n] (op' x y) = op' (op^[n] x) (op^[n] y) :=
by induction n; [simp only [iterate_zero], simp only [iterate_succ', H, *]]
theorem iterate_cancel {α : Type u} {op op' : α → α} (H : ∀ x, op (op' x) = x) {n : ℕ} {x : α} : op^[n] (op'^[n] x) = x :=
by induction n; [refl, rwa [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', H]]
theorem iterate_inj {α : Type u} {op : α → α} (Hinj : function.injective op) (n : ℕ) (x y : α)
(H : (op^[n] x) = (op^[n] y)) : x = y :=
by induction n with n ih; simp only [iterate_zero, iterate_succ'] at H;
[exact H, exact ih (Hinj H)]
end
/- size and shift -/
theorem shiftl'_ne_zero_left (b) {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) : shiftl' b m n ≠ 0 :=
by induction n; simp [shiftl', bit_ne_zero, *]
theorem shiftl'_tt_ne_zero (m) : ∀ {n} (h : n ≠ 0), shiftl' tt m n ≠ 0
| 0 h := absurd rfl h
| (succ n) _ := nat.bit1_ne_zero _
@[simp] theorem size_zero : size 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_bit {b n} (h : bit b n ≠ 0) : size (bit b n) = succ (size n) :=
begin
rw size,
conv { to_lhs, rw [binary_rec], simp [h] },
rw div2_bit, refl
end
@[simp] theorem size_bit0 {n} (h : n ≠ 0) : size (bit0 n) = succ (size n) :=
@size_bit ff n (nat.bit0_ne_zero h)
@[simp] theorem size_bit1 (n) : size (bit1 n) = succ (size n) :=
@size_bit tt n (nat.bit1_ne_zero n)
@[simp] theorem size_one : size 1 = 1 := by apply size_bit1 0
@[simp] theorem size_shiftl' {b m n} (h : shiftl' b m n ≠ 0) :
size (shiftl' b m n) = size m + n :=
begin
induction n with n IH; simp [shiftl'] at h ⊢,
rw [size_bit h, nat.add_succ],
by_cases s0 : shiftl' b m n = 0; [skip, rw [IH s0]],
rw s0 at h ⊢,
cases b, {exact absurd rfl h},
have : shiftl' tt m n + 1 = 1 := congr_arg (+1) s0,
rw [shiftl'_tt_eq_mul_pow] at this,
have m0 := succ_inj (eq_one_of_dvd_one ⟨_, this.symm⟩),
subst m0,
simp at this,
have : n = 0 := eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_not_gt $ λ hn,
ne_of_gt (pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right dec_trivial hn) this),
subst n, refl
end
@[simp] theorem size_shiftl {m} (h : m ≠ 0) (n) :
size (shiftl m n) = size m + n :=
size_shiftl' (shiftl'_ne_zero_left _ h _)
theorem lt_size_self (n : ℕ) : n < 2^size n :=
begin
rw [← one_shiftl],
have : ∀ {n}, n = 0 → n < shiftl 1 (size n) :=
λ n e, by subst e; exact dec_trivial,
apply binary_rec _ _ n, {apply this rfl},
intros b n IH,
by_cases bit b n = 0, {apply this h},
rw [size_bit h, shiftl_succ],
exact bit_lt_bit0 _ IH
end
theorem size_le {m n : ℕ} : size m ≤ n ↔ m < 2^n :=
⟨λ h, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_size_self _) (pow_le_pow_of_le_right dec_trivial h),
begin
rw [← one_shiftl], revert n,
apply binary_rec _ _ m,
{ intros n h, apply zero_le },
{ intros b m IH n h,
by_cases e : bit b m = 0, { rw e, apply zero_le },
rw [size_bit e],
cases n with n,
{ exact e.elim (eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_lt_succ h)) },
{ apply succ_le_succ (IH _),
apply lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (λ h', bit0_le_bit _ h') h } }
end⟩
theorem lt_size {m n : ℕ} : m < size n ↔ 2^m ≤ n :=
by rw [← not_lt, iff_not_comm, not_lt, size_le]
theorem size_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < size n ↔ 0 < n :=
by rw lt_size; refl
theorem size_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : size n = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by have := @size_pos n; simp [pos_iff_ne_zero'] at this;
exact not_iff_not.1 this
theorem size_pow {n : ℕ} : size (2^n) = n+1 :=
le_antisymm
(size_le.2 $ pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right dec_trivial (lt_succ_self _))
(lt_size.2 $ le_refl _)
theorem size_le_size {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : size m ≤ size n :=
size_le.2 $ lt_of_le_of_lt h (lt_size_self _)
/- factorial -/
/-- `fact n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
@[simp] def fact : nat → nat
| 0 := 1
| (succ n) := succ n * fact n
@[simp] theorem fact_zero : fact 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fact_one : fact 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fact_succ (n) : fact (succ n) = succ n * fact n := rfl
theorem fact_pos : ∀ n, fact n > 0
| 0 := zero_lt_one
| (succ n) := mul_pos (succ_pos _) (fact_pos n)
theorem fact_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : fact n ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (fact_pos _)
theorem fact_dvd_fact {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : fact m ∣ fact n :=
begin
induction n with n IH; simp,
{ have := eq_zero_of_le_zero h, subst m, simp },
{ cases eq_or_lt_of_le h with he hl,
{ subst m, simp },
{ apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (IH (le_of_lt_succ hl)) } }
end
theorem dvd_fact : ∀ {m n}, m > 0 → m ≤ n → m ∣ fact n
| (succ m) n _ h := dvd_of_mul_right_dvd (fact_dvd_fact h)
theorem fact_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : fact m ≤ fact n :=
le_of_dvd (fact_pos _) (fact_dvd_fact h)
lemma fact_mul_pow_le_fact : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.fact * m.succ ^ n ≤ (m + n).fact
| m 0 := by simp
| m (n+1) :=
by rw [← add_assoc, nat.fact_succ, mul_comm (nat.succ _), nat.pow_succ, ← mul_assoc];
exact mul_le_mul fact_mul_pow_le_fact
(nat.succ_le_succ (nat.le_add_right _ _)) (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)
/- choose -/
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _ 0 := 1
| 0 (k + 1) := 0
| (n + 1) (k + 1) := choose n k + choose n (succ k)
@[simp] lemma choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n; refl
@[simp] lemma choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 := rfl
lemma choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) := rfl
lemma choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _ 0 hk := absurd hk dec_trivial
| 0 (k + 1) hk := choose_zero_succ _
| (n + 1) (k + 1) hk :=
have hnk : n < k, from lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk,
have hnk1 : n < k + 1, from lt_of_succ_lt hk,
by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
@[simp] lemma choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 :=
by induction n; simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
@[simp] lemma choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n :=
by induction n; simp [*, choose]
lemma choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0 _ hk := by rw [eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; exact dec_trivial
| (n + 1) 0 hk := by simp; exact dec_trivial
| (n + 1) (k + 1) hk := by rw choose_succ_succ;
exact add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) (nat.zero_le _)
lemma succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0 0 := dec_trivial
| 0 (k + 1) := by simp [choose]
| (n + 1) 0 := by simp
| (n + 1) (k + 1) :=
by rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), add_mul, ←succ_mul_choose_eq, mul_succ,
←succ_mul_choose_eq, add_right_comm, ←mul_add, ←choose_succ_succ, ←succ_mul]
lemma choose_mul_fact_mul_fact : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * fact k * fact (n - k) = fact n
| 0 _ hk := by simp [eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| (n + 1) 0 hk := by simp
| (n + 1) (succ k) hk :=
begin
cases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ hk₁,
{ have h : choose n k * fact (succ k) * fact (n - k) = succ k * fact n :=
by rw ← choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (le_of_succ_le_succ hk);
simp [fact_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm],
have h₁ : fact (n - k) = (n - k) * fact (n - succ k) :=
by rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), fact_succ],
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * fact (succ k) * ((n - k) * fact (n - succ k)) = (n - k) * fact n :=
by rw ← choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (le_of_lt_succ hk₁);
simp [fact_succ, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc],
have h₃ : k * fact n ≤ n * fact n := mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk),
rw [choose_succ_succ, add_mul, add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, ← add_one, add_mul, nat.mul_sub_right_distrib,
fact_succ, ← nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, add_assoc, ← add_mul, nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm] },
{ simp [hk₁, mul_comm, choose, nat.sub_self] }
end
theorem choose_eq_fact_div_fact {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n k = fact n / (fact k * fact (n - k)) :=
begin
have : fact n = choose n k * (fact k * fact (n - k)) :=
by rw ← mul_assoc; exact (choose_mul_fact_mul_fact hk).symm,
exact (nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (mul_pos (fact_pos _) (fact_pos _)) this).symm
end
theorem fact_mul_fact_dvd_fact {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : fact k * fact (n - k) ∣ fact n :=
by rw [←choose_mul_fact_mul_fact hk, mul_assoc]; exact dvd_mul_left _ _
section find_greatest
/-- `find_greatest P b` is the largest `i ≤ bound` such that `P i` holds, or `0` if no such `i`
exists -/
protected def find_greatest (P : ℕ → Prop) [decidable_pred P] : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (n + 1) := if P (n + 1) then n + 1 else find_greatest n
variables {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P]
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_zero : nat.find_greatest P 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_eq : ∀{b}, P b → nat.find_greatest P b = b
| 0 h := rfl
| (n + 1) h := by simp [nat.find_greatest, h]
@[simp] lemma find_greatest_of_not {b} (h : ¬ P (b + 1)) :
nat.find_greatest P (b + 1) = nat.find_greatest P b :=
by simp [nat.find_greatest, h]
lemma find_greatest_spec_and_le :
∀{b m}, m ≤ b → P m → P (nat.find_greatest P b) ∧ m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b
| 0 m hm hP :=
have m = 0, from le_antisymm hm (nat.zero_le _),
show P 0 ∧ m ≤ 0, from this ▸ ⟨hP, le_refl _⟩
| (b + 1) m hm hP :=
begin
by_cases h : P (b + 1),
{ simp [h, hm] },
{ have : m ≠ b + 1 := assume this, h $ this ▸ hP,
have : m ≤ b := (le_of_not_gt $ assume h : b + 1 ≤ m, this $ le_antisymm hm h),
have : P (nat.find_greatest P b) ∧ m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b :=
find_greatest_spec_and_le this hP,
simp [h, this] }
end
lemma find_greatest_spec {b} : (∃m, m ≤ b ∧ P m) → P (nat.find_greatest P b)
| ⟨m, hmb, hm⟩ := (find_greatest_spec_and_le hmb hm).1
lemma find_greatest_le : ∀ {b}, nat.find_greatest P b ≤ b
| 0 := le_refl _
| (b + 1) :=
have nat.find_greatest P b ≤ b + 1, from le_trans find_greatest_le (nat.le_succ b),
by by_cases P (b + 1); simp [h, this]
lemma le_find_greatest {b m} (hmb : m ≤ b) (hm : P m) : m ≤ nat.find_greatest P b :=
(find_greatest_spec_and_le hmb hm).2
lemma find_greatest_is_greatest {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] {b} :
(∃ m, m ≤ b ∧ P m) → ∀ k, nat.find_greatest P b < k ∧ k ≤ b → ¬ P k
| ⟨m, hmb, hP⟩ k ⟨hk, hkb⟩ hPk := lt_irrefl k $ lt_of_le_of_lt (le_find_greatest hkb hPk) hk
lemma find_greatest_eq_zero {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] :
∀ {b}, (∀ n ≤ b, ¬ P n) → nat.find_greatest P b = 0
| 0 h := find_greatest_zero
| (n + 1) h :=
begin
have := nat.find_greatest_of_not (h (n + 1) (le_refl _)),
rw this, exact find_greatest_eq_zero (assume k hk, h k (le_trans hk $ nat.le_succ _))
end
lemma find_greatest_of_ne_zero {P : ℕ → Prop} [decidable_pred P] :
∀ {b m}, nat.find_greatest P b = m → m ≠ 0 → P m
| 0 m rfl h := by { have := @find_greatest_zero P _, contradiction }
| (b + 1) m rfl h :=
decidable.by_cases
(assume hb : P (b + 1), by { have := find_greatest_eq hb, rw this, exact hb })
(assume hb : ¬ P (b + 1), find_greatest_of_ne_zero (find_greatest_of_not hb).symm h)
end find_greatest
section div
lemma dvd_div_of_mul_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c / a :=
if ha : a = 0 then
by simp [ha]
else
have ha : a > 0, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero ha,
have h1 : ∃ d, c = a * b * d, from h,
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := h1 in
have hac : a ∣ c, from dvd_of_mul_right_dvd h,
have h2 : c / a = b * d, from nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right ha (by simpa [mul_assoc] using hd),
show ∃ d, c / a = b * d, from ⟨d, h2⟩
lemma mul_dvd_of_dvd_div {a b c : ℕ} (hab : c ∣ b) (h : a ∣ b / c) : c * a ∣ b :=
have h1 : ∃ d, b / c = a * d, from h,
have h2 : ∃ e, b = c * e, from hab,
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := h1, ⟨e, he⟩ := h2 in
have h3 : b = a * d * c, from
nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left hab hd,
show ∃ d, b = c * a * d, from ⟨d, by cc⟩
lemma div_mul_div {a b c d : ℕ} (hab : b ∣ a) (hcd : d ∣ c) :
(a / b) * (c / d) = (a * c) / (b * d) :=
have exi1 : ∃ x, a = b * x, from hab,
have exi2 : ∃ y, c = d * y, from hcd,
if hb : b = 0 then by simp [hb]
else have b > 0, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb,
if hd : d = 0 then by simp [hd]
else have d > 0, from nat.pos_of_ne_zero hd,
begin
cases exi1 with x hx, cases exi2 with y hy,
rw [hx, hy, nat.mul_div_cancel_left, nat.mul_div_cancel_left],
symmetry,
apply nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left,
apply mul_pos,
repeat {assumption},
cc
end
lemma pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd {p m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hdiv : p ^ n ∣ k) : p ^ m ∣ k :=
have p ^ m ∣ p ^ n, from pow_dvd_pow _ hmn,
dvd_trans this hdiv
lemma dvd_of_pow_dvd {p k m : ℕ} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hpk : p^k ∣ m) : p ∣ m :=
by rw ←nat.pow_one p; exact pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hk hpk
lemma eq_of_dvd_quot_one {a b : ℕ} (w : a ∣ b) (h : b / a = 1) : a = b :=
begin
rcases w with ⟨b, rfl⟩,
rw [nat.mul_comm, nat.mul_div_cancel] at h,
{ simp [h] },
{ by_contradiction, simp * at * }
end
lemma div_le_div_left {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : c ≤ b) (h₂ : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c :=
(nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ h₂).2 $
le_trans (mul_le_mul_left _ h₁) (div_mul_le_self _ _)
lemma div_eq_self {a b : ℕ} : a / b = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 1 :=
begin
split,
{ intro,
cases b,
{ simp * at * },
{ cases b,
{ right, refl },
{ left,
have : a / (b + 2) ≤ a / 2 := div_le_div_left (by simp) dec_trivial,
refine eq_zero_of_le_half _,
simp * at * } } },
{ rintros (rfl|rfl); simp }
end
end div
lemma exists_eq_add_of_le : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → ∃ k : ℕ, n = m + k
| 0 0 h := ⟨0, by simp⟩
| 0 (n+1) h := ⟨n+1, by simp⟩
| (m+1) (n+1) h := let ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_eq_add_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) in ⟨k, by simp [hk]⟩
lemma exists_eq_add_of_lt : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m < n → ∃ k : ℕ, n = m + k + 1
| 0 0 h := false.elim $ lt_irrefl _ h
| 0 (n+1) h := ⟨n, by simp⟩
| (m+1) (n+1) h := let ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_eq_add_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) in ⟨k, by simp [hk]⟩
lemma with_bot.add_eq_zero_iff : ∀ {n m : with_bot ℕ}, n + m = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 0
| none m := iff_of_false dec_trivial (λ h, absurd h.1 dec_trivial)
| n none := iff_of_false (by cases n; exact dec_trivial)
(λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial)
| (some n) (some m) := show (n + m : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ) ↔ (n : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ) ∧
(m : with_bot ℕ) = (0 : ℕ),
by rw [← with_bot.coe_add, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe, add_eq_zero_iff' (nat.zero_le _) (nat.zero_le _)]
lemma with_bot.add_eq_one_iff : ∀ {n m : with_bot ℕ}, n + m = 1 ↔ (n = 0 ∧ m = 1) ∨ (n = 1 ∧ m = 0)
| none none := dec_trivial
| none (some m) := dec_trivial
| (some n) none := iff_of_false dec_trivial (λ h, h.elim (λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial)
(λ h, absurd h.2 dec_trivial))
| (some n) (some 0) := by erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe]; simp
| (some n) (some (m + 1)) := by erw [with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe,
with_bot.coe_eq_coe, with_bot.coe_eq_coe]; simp [nat.add_succ, nat.succ_inj', nat.succ_ne_zero]
-- induction
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma le_induction {P : nat → Prop} {m} (h0 : P m) (h1 : ∀ n ≥ m, P n → P (n + 1)) :
∀ n ≥ m, P n :=
by apply nat.less_than_or_equal.rec h0; exact h1
@[elab_as_eliminator]
def decreasing_induction {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n)
(hP : P n) : P m :=
le_rec_on mn (λ k ih hsk, ih $ h k hsk) (λ h, h) hP
@[simp] lemma decreasing_induction_self {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {n : ℕ}
(nn : n ≤ n) (hP : P n) : (decreasing_induction h nn hP : P n) = hP :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_self] }
lemma decreasing_induction_succ {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n)
(msn : m ≤ n + 1) (hP : P (n+1)) :
(decreasing_induction h msn hP : P m) = decreasing_induction h mn (h n hP) :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_succ] }
@[simp] lemma decreasing_induction_succ' {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m : ℕ}
(msm : m ≤ m + 1) (hP : P (m+1)) : (decreasing_induction h msm hP : P m) = h m hP :=
by { dunfold decreasing_induction, rw [le_rec_on_succ'] }
lemma decreasing_induction_trans {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n k : ℕ}
(mn : m ≤ n) (nk : n ≤ k) (hP : P k) :
(decreasing_induction h (le_trans mn nk) hP : P m) =
decreasing_induction h mn (decreasing_induction h nk hP) :=
by { induction nk with k nk ih, rw [decreasing_induction_self],
rw [decreasing_induction_succ h (le_trans mn nk), ih, decreasing_induction_succ] }
lemma decreasing_induction_succ_left {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h : ∀n, P (n+1) → P n) {m n : ℕ}
(smn : m + 1 ≤ n) (mn : m ≤ n) (hP : P n) :
(decreasing_induction h mn hP : P m) = h m (decreasing_induction h smn hP) :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim mn (le_trans (le_succ m) smn), decreasing_induction_trans,
decreasing_induction_succ'] }
end nat
|
d8416433bb0732c5413a3d8fcda90052e1dbf931 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Init/Data/Option/Instances.lean | 031bcadc707002e4d92bcc7e065ef74aa148a63f | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 660 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Option.Basic
universe u v
theorem Option.eq_of_eq_some {α : Type u} : ∀ {x y : Option α}, (∀z, x = some z ↔ y = some z) → x = y
| none, none, _ => rfl
| none, some z, h => Option.noConfusion ((h z).2 rfl)
| some z, none, h => Option.noConfusion ((h z).1 rfl)
| some _, some w, h => Option.noConfusion ((h w).2 rfl) (congrArg some)
theorem Option.eq_none_of_isNone {α : Type u} : ∀ {o : Option α}, o.isNone → o = none
| none, _ => rfl
|
03c90ae2a5ba2db4ca3e663f6088a40165db65b7 | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/analysis/normed_space/multilinear.lean | 11b565aee98cc18b4b7342c430571e3b3dd864fc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 73,500 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.normed_space.operator_norm
import topology.algebra.multilinear
/-!
# Operator norm on the space of continuous multilinear maps
When `f` is a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables, we define its norm `∥f∥` as the
smallest number such that `∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥` for all `m`.
We show that it is indeed a norm, and prove its basic properties.
## Main results
Let `f` be a multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `exists_bound_of_continuous` asserts that, if `f` is continuous, then there exists `C > 0`
with `∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥` for all `m`.
* `continuous_of_bound`, conversely, asserts that this bound implies continuity.
* `mk_continuous` constructs the associated continuous multilinear map.
Let `f` be a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `∥f∥` is its norm, i.e., the smallest number such that `∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥` for
all `m`.
* `le_op_norm f m` asserts the fundamental inequality `∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥`.
* `norm_image_sub_le f m₁ m₂` gives a control of the difference `f m₁ - f m₂` in terms of
`∥f∥` and `∥m₁ - m₂∥`.
We also register isomorphisms corresponding to currying or uncurrying variables, transforming a
continuous multilinear function `f` in `n+1` variables into a continuous linear function taking
values in continuous multilinear functions in `n` variables, and also into a continuous multilinear
function in `n` variables taking values in continuous linear functions. These operations are called
`f.curry_left` and `f.curry_right` respectively (with inverses `f.uncurry_left` and
`f.uncurry_right`). They induce continuous linear equivalences between spaces of
continuous multilinear functions in `n+1` variables and spaces of continuous linear functions into
continuous multilinear functions in `n` variables (resp. continuous multilinear functions in `n`
variables taking values in continuous linear functions), called respectively
`continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv` and `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv`.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API (and the proofs) of `operator_norm.lean`, with the additional complexity
that we should deal with multilinear maps in several variables. The currying/uncurrying
constructions are based on those in `multilinear.lean`.
From the mathematical point of view, all the results follow from the results on operator norm in
one variable, by applying them to one variable after the other through currying. However, this
is only well defined when there is an order on the variables (for instance on `fin n`) although
the final result is independent of the order. While everything could be done following this
approach, it turns out that direct proofs are easier and more efficient.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal
open finset metric
local attribute [instance, priority 1001]
add_comm_group.to_add_comm_monoid normed_group.to_add_comm_group normed_space.to_module
-- hack to speed up simp when dealing with complicated types
local attribute [-instance] unique.subsingleton pi.subsingleton
/-!
### Type variables
We use the following type variables in this file:
* `𝕜` : a `nondiscrete_normed_field`;
* `ι`, `ι'` : finite index types with decidable equality;
* `E`, `E₁` : families of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : ι`;
* `E'` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i' : ι'`;
* `Ei` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : fin (nat.succ n)`;
* `G`, `G'` : normed vector spaces over `𝕜`.
-/
universes u v v' wE wE₁ wE' wEi wG wG'
variables {𝕜 : Type u} {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {n : ℕ}
{E : ι → Type wE} {E₁ : ι → Type wE₁} {E' : ι' → Type wE'} {Ei : fin n.succ → Type wEi}
{G : Type wG} {G' : Type wG'}
[decidable_eq ι] [fintype ι] [decidable_eq ι'] [fintype ι'] [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
[Π i, normed_group (E i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (E i)]
[Π i, normed_group (E₁ i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (E₁ i)]
[Π i, normed_group (E' i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (E' i)]
[Π i, normed_group (Ei i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (Ei i)]
[normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G] [normed_group G'] [normed_space 𝕜 G']
/-!
### Continuity properties of multilinear maps
We relate continuity of multilinear maps to the inequality `∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥`, in
both directions. Along the way, we prove useful bounds on the difference `∥f m₁ - f m₂∥`.
-/
namespace multilinear_map
variable (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E G)
/-- If a multilinear map in finitely many variables on normed spaces satisfies the inequality
`∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥` on a shell `ε i / ∥c i∥ < ∥m i∥ < ε i` for some positive numbers `ε i`
and elements `c i : 𝕜`, `1 < ∥c i∥`, then it satisfies this inequality for all `m`. -/
lemma bound_of_shell {ε : ι → ℝ} {C : ℝ} (hε : ∀ i, 0 < ε i) {c : ι → 𝕜} (hc : ∀ i, 1 < ∥c i∥)
(hf : ∀ m : Π i, E i, (∀ i, ε i / ∥c i∥ ≤ ∥m i∥) → (∀ i, ∥m i∥ < ε i) → ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥)
(m : Π i, E i) : ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ :=
begin
rcases em (∃ i, m i = 0) with ⟨i, hi⟩|hm; [skip, push_neg at hm],
{ simp [f.map_coord_zero i hi, prod_eq_zero (mem_univ i), hi] },
choose δ hδ0 hδm_lt hle_δm hδinv using λ i, rescale_to_shell (hc i) (hε i) (hm i),
have hδ0 : 0 < ∏ i, ∥δ i∥, from prod_pos (λ i _, norm_pos_iff.2 (hδ0 i)),
simpa [map_smul_univ, norm_smul, prod_mul_distrib, mul_left_comm C, mul_le_mul_left hδ0]
using hf (λ i, δ i • m i) hle_δm hδm_lt,
end
/-- If a multilinear map in finitely many variables on normed spaces is continuous, then it
satisfies the inequality `∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥`, for some `C` which can be chosen to be
positive. -/
theorem exists_bound_of_continuous (hf : continuous f) :
∃ (C : ℝ), 0 < C ∧ (∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :=
begin
by_cases hι : nonempty ι, swap,
{ refine ⟨∥f 0∥ + 1, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one, λ m, _⟩,
obtain rfl : m = 0, from funext (λ i, (hι ⟨i⟩).elim),
simp [univ_eq_empty.2 hι, zero_le_one] },
resetI,
obtain ⟨ε : ℝ, ε0 : 0 < ε, hε : ∀ m : Π i, E i, ∥m - 0∥ < ε → ∥f m - f 0∥ < 1⟩ :=
normed_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds.1 (hf.tendsto 0) 1 zero_lt_one,
simp only [sub_zero, f.map_zero] at hε,
rcases normed_field.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩,
have : 0 < (∥c∥ / ε) ^ fintype.card ι, from pow_pos (div_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hc) ε0) _,
refine ⟨_, this, _⟩,
refine f.bound_of_shell (λ _, ε0) (λ _, hc) (λ m hcm hm, _),
refine (hε m ((pi_norm_lt_iff ε0).2 hm)).le.trans _,
rw [← div_le_iff' this, one_div, ← inv_pow', inv_div, fintype.card, ← prod_const],
exact prod_le_prod (λ _ _, div_nonneg ε0.le (norm_nonneg _)) (λ i _, hcm i)
end
/-- If `f` satisfies a boundedness property around `0`, one can deduce a bound on `f m₁ - f m₂`
using the multilinearity. Here, we give a precise but hard to use version. See
`norm_image_sub_le_of_bound` for a less precise but more usable version. The bound reads
`∥f m - f m'∥ ≤
C * ∥m 1 - m' 1∥ * max ∥m 2∥ ∥m' 2∥ * max ∥m 3∥ ∥m' 3∥ * ... * max ∥m n∥ ∥m' n∥ + ...`,
where the other terms in the sum are the same products where `1` is replaced by any `i`. -/
lemma norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) (m₁ m₂ : Πi, E i) :
∥f m₁ - f m₂∥ ≤
C * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥ :=
begin
have A : ∀(s : finset ι), ∥f m₁ - f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁)∥
≤ C * ∑ i in s, ∏ j, if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥,
{ refine finset.induction (by simp) _,
assume i s his Hrec,
have I : ∥f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)∥
≤ C * ∏ j, if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥,
{ have A : ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)
= function.update (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) i (m₂ i) := s.piecewise_insert _ _ _,
have B : s.piecewise m₂ m₁ = function.update (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) i (m₁ i),
{ ext j,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp [his] },
{ simp [h] } },
rw [B, A, ← f.map_sub],
apply le_trans (H _) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ hC),
refine prod_le_prod (λj hj, norm_nonneg _) (λj hj, _),
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp },
{ by_cases h' : j ∈ s;
simp [h', h, le_refl] } },
calc ∥f m₁ - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)∥ ≤
∥f m₁ - f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁)∥ + ∥f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)∥ :
by { rw [← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm], exact dist_triangle _ _ _ }
... ≤ (C * ∑ i in s, ∏ j, if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥)
+ C * ∏ j, if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥ :
add_le_add Hrec I
... = C * ∑ i in insert i s, ∏ j, if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥ :
by simp [his, add_comm, left_distrib] },
convert A univ,
simp
end
/-- If `f` satisfies a boundedness property around `0`, one can deduce a bound on `f m₁ - f m₂`
using the multilinearity. Here, we give a usable but not very precise version. See
`norm_image_sub_le_of_bound'` for a more precise but less usable version. The bound is
`∥f m - f m'∥ ≤ C * card ι * ∥m - m'∥ * (max ∥m∥ ∥m'∥) ^ (card ι - 1)`. -/
lemma norm_image_sub_le_of_bound {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) (m₁ m₂ : Πi, E i) :
∥f m₁ - f m₂∥ ≤ C * (fintype.card ι) * (max ∥m₁∥ ∥m₂∥) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ∥m₁ - m₂∥ :=
begin
have A : ∀ (i : ι), ∏ j, (if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥)
≤ ∥m₁ - m₂∥ * (max ∥m₁∥ ∥m₂∥) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1),
{ assume i,
calc ∏ j, (if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥)
≤ ∏ j : ι, function.update (λ j, max ∥m₁∥ ∥m₂∥) i (∥m₁ - m₂∥) j :
begin
apply prod_le_prod,
{ assume j hj, by_cases h : j = i; simp [h, norm_nonneg] },
{ assume j hj,
by_cases h : j = i,
{ rw h, simp, exact norm_le_pi_norm (m₁ - m₂) i },
{ simp [h, max_le_max, norm_le_pi_norm] } }
end
... = ∥m₁ - m₂∥ * (max ∥m₁∥ ∥m₂∥) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) :
by { rw prod_update_of_mem (finset.mem_univ _), simp [card_univ_diff] } },
calc
∥f m₁ - f m₂∥
≤ C * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥ :
f.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' hC H m₁ m₂
... ≤ C * ∑ i, ∥m₁ - m₂∥ * (max ∥m₁∥ ∥m₂∥) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sum_le_sum (λi hi, A i)) hC
... = C * (fintype.card ι) * (max ∥m₁∥ ∥m₂∥) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ∥m₁ - m₂∥ :
by { rw [sum_const, card_univ, nsmul_eq_mul], ring }
end
/-- If a multilinear map satisfies an inequality `∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥`, then it is
continuous. -/
theorem continuous_of_bound (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
continuous f :=
begin
let D := max C 1,
have D_pos : 0 ≤ D := le_trans zero_le_one (le_max_right _ _),
replace H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ D * ∏ i, ∥m i∥,
{ assume m,
apply le_trans (H m) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) _),
exact prod_nonneg (λ(i : ι) hi, norm_nonneg (m i)) },
refine continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 (λm, _),
refine continuous_at_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one
(D * (fintype.card ι) * (∥m∥ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1)) (λm' h', _),
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm],
have : 0 ≤ (max ∥m'∥ ∥m∥), by simp,
have : (max ∥m'∥ ∥m∥) ≤ ∥m∥ + 1,
by simp [zero_le_one, norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball (le_of_lt h'), -add_comm],
calc
∥f m' - f m∥
≤ D * (fintype.card ι) * (max ∥m'∥ ∥m∥) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ∥m' - m∥ :
f.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound D_pos H m' m
... ≤ D * (fintype.card ι) * (∥m∥ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ∥m' - m∥ :
by apply_rules [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left, mul_nonneg,
norm_nonneg, nat.cast_nonneg, pow_le_pow_of_le_left]
end
/-- Constructing a continuous multilinear map from a multilinear map satisfying a boundedness
condition. -/
def mk_continuous (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G :=
{ cont := f.continuous_of_bound C H, ..f }
@[simp] lemma coe_mk_continuous (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
⇑(f.mk_continuous C H) = f :=
rfl
/-- Given a multilinear map in `n` variables, if one restricts it to `k` variables putting `z` on
the other coordinates, then the resulting restricted function satisfies an inequality
`∥f.restr v∥ ≤ C * ∥z∥^(n-k) * Π ∥v i∥` if the original function satisfies `∥f v∥ ≤ C * Π ∥v i∥`. -/
lemma restr_norm_le {k n : ℕ} (f : (multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, G) G' : _))
(s : finset (fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) {C : ℝ}
(H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) (v : fin k → G) :
∥f.restr s hk z v∥ ≤ C * ∥z∥ ^ (n - k) * ∏ i, ∥v i∥ :=
begin
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc],
convert H _ using 2,
simp only [apply_dite norm, fintype.prod_dite, prod_const (∥z∥), finset.card_univ,
fintype.card_of_subtype sᶜ (λ x, mem_compl), card_compl, fintype.card_fin, hk, mk_coe,
← (s.order_iso_of_fin hk).symm.bijective.prod_comp (λ x, ∥v x∥)],
refl
end
end multilinear_map
/-!
### Continuous multilinear maps
We define the norm `∥f∥` of a continuous multilinear map `f` in finitely many variables as the
smallest number such that `∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥` for all `m`. We show that this
defines a normed space structure on `continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G`.
-/
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
variables (c : 𝕜) (f g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) (m : Πi, E i)
theorem bound : ∃ (C : ℝ), 0 < C ∧ (∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :=
f.to_multilinear_map.exists_bound_of_continuous f.2
open real
/-- The operator norm of a continuous multilinear map is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def op_norm := Inf {c | 0 ≤ (c : ℝ) ∧ ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ c * ∏ i, ∥m i∥}
instance has_op_norm : has_norm (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) := ⟨op_norm⟩
lemma norm_def : ∥f∥ = Inf {c | 0 ≤ (c : ℝ) ∧ ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ c * ∏ i, ∥m i∥} := rfl
-- So that invocations of `real.Inf_le` make sense: we show that the set of
-- bounds is nonempty and bounded below.
lemma bounds_nonempty {f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G} :
∃ c, c ∈ {c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ c * ∏ i, ∥m i∥} :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.bound in ⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
lemma bounds_bdd_below {f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G} :
bdd_below {c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ c * ∏ i, ∥m i∥} :=
⟨0, λ _ ⟨hn, _⟩, hn⟩
lemma op_norm_nonneg : 0 ≤ ∥f∥ :=
lb_le_Inf _ bounds_nonempty (λ _ ⟨hx, _⟩, hx)
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm of a continuous multilinear map:
`∥f m∥` is bounded by `∥f∥` times the product of the `∥m i∥`. -/
theorem le_op_norm : ∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ :=
begin
have A : 0 ≤ ∏ i, ∥m i∥ := prod_nonneg (λj hj, norm_nonneg _),
cases A.eq_or_lt with h hlt,
{ rcases prod_eq_zero_iff.1 h.symm with ⟨i, _, hi⟩,
rw norm_eq_zero at hi,
have : f m = 0 := f.map_coord_zero i hi,
rw [this, norm_zero],
exact mul_nonneg (op_norm_nonneg f) A },
{ rw [← div_le_iff hlt],
apply (le_Inf _ bounds_nonempty bounds_bdd_below).2,
rintro c ⟨_, hc⟩, rw [div_le_iff hlt], apply hc }
end
theorem le_of_op_norm_le {C : ℝ} (h : ∥f∥ ≤ C) : ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ :=
(f.le_op_norm m).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (prod_nonneg $ λ i _, norm_nonneg (m i))
lemma ratio_le_op_norm : ∥f m∥ / ∏ i, ∥m i∥ ≤ ∥f∥ :=
div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (prod_nonneg $ λ i _, norm_nonneg _) (op_norm_nonneg _) (f.le_op_norm m)
/-- The image of the unit ball under a continuous multilinear map is bounded. -/
lemma unit_le_op_norm (h : ∥m∥ ≤ 1) : ∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ :=
calc
∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ : f.le_op_norm m
... ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i : ι, 1 :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (prod_le_prod (λi hi, norm_nonneg _)
(λi hi, le_trans (norm_le_pi_norm _ _) h)) (op_norm_nonneg f)
... = ∥f∥ : by simp
/-- If one controls the norm of every `f x`, then one controls the norm of `f`. -/
lemma op_norm_le_bound {M : ℝ} (hMp: 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ M * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
∥f∥ ≤ M :=
Inf_le _ bounds_bdd_below ⟨hMp, hM⟩
/-- The operator norm satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem op_norm_add_le : ∥f + g∥ ≤ ∥f∥ + ∥g∥ :=
Inf_le _ bounds_bdd_below
⟨add_nonneg (op_norm_nonneg _) (op_norm_nonneg _), λ x, by { rw add_mul,
exact norm_add_le_of_le (le_op_norm _ _) (le_op_norm _ _) }⟩
/-- A continuous linear map is zero iff its norm vanishes. -/
theorem op_norm_zero_iff : ∥f∥ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
ext m,
simpa [h] using f.le_op_norm m },
{ rintro rfl,
apply le_antisymm (op_norm_le_bound 0 le_rfl (λm, _)) (op_norm_nonneg _),
simp }
end
variables {𝕜' : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜' 𝕜]
[normed_space 𝕜' G] [is_scalar_tower 𝕜' 𝕜 G]
lemma op_norm_smul_le (c : 𝕜') : ∥c • f∥ ≤ ∥c∥ * ∥f∥ :=
(c • f).op_norm_le_bound
(mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (op_norm_nonneg _))
begin
intro m,
erw [norm_smul, mul_assoc],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_op_norm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
end
lemma op_norm_neg : ∥-f∥ = ∥f∥ := by { rw norm_def, apply congr_arg, ext, simp }
/-- Continuous multilinear maps themselves form a normed space with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance to_normed_group : normed_group (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :=
normed_group.of_core _ ⟨op_norm_zero_iff, op_norm_add_le, op_norm_neg⟩
instance to_normed_space : normed_space 𝕜' (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :=
⟨λ c f, f.op_norm_smul_le c⟩
theorem le_op_norm_mul_prod_of_le {b : ι → ℝ} (hm : ∀ i, ∥m i∥ ≤ b i) : ∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, b i :=
(f.le_op_norm m).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(prod_le_prod (λ _ _, norm_nonneg _) (λ i _, hm i)) (norm_nonneg f)
theorem le_op_norm_mul_pow_card_of_le {b : ℝ} (hm : ∀ i, ∥m i∥ ≤ b) :
∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * b ^ fintype.card ι :=
by simpa only [prod_const] using f.le_op_norm_mul_prod_of_le m hm
theorem le_op_norm_mul_pow_of_le {Ei : fin n → Type*} [Π i, normed_group (Ei i)]
[Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (Ei i)] (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (m : Π i, Ei i)
{b : ℝ} (hm : ∥m∥ ≤ b) :
∥f m∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * b ^ n :=
by simpa only [fintype.card_fin]
using f.le_op_norm_mul_pow_card_of_le m (λ i, (norm_le_pi_norm m i).trans hm)
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm of a continuous multilinear map:
`∥f m∥` is bounded by `∥f∥` times the product of the `∥m i∥`, `nnnorm` version. -/
theorem le_op_nnnorm : nnnorm (f m) ≤ nnnorm f * ∏ i, nnnorm (m i) :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 $ by { push_cast, exact f.le_op_norm m }
theorem le_of_op_nnnorm_le {C : ℝ≥0} (h : nnnorm f ≤ C) : nnnorm (f m) ≤ C * ∏ i, nnnorm (m i) :=
(f.le_op_nnnorm m).trans $ mul_le_mul' h le_rfl
lemma op_norm_prod (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) (g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') :
∥f.prod g∥ = max (∥f∥) (∥g∥) :=
le_antisymm
(op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg (f, g)) (λ m,
have H : 0 ≤ ∏ i, ∥m i∥, from prod_nonneg $ λ _ _, norm_nonneg _,
by simpa only [prod_apply, prod.norm_def, max_mul_of_nonneg, H]
using max_le_max (f.le_op_norm m) (g.le_op_norm m))) $
max_le
(f.op_norm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) $ λ m, (le_max_left _ _).trans ((f.prod g).le_op_norm _))
(g.op_norm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) $ λ m, (le_max_right _ _).trans ((f.prod g).le_op_norm _))
lemma norm_pi {ι' : Type v'} [fintype ι'] {E' : ι' → Type wE'} [Π i', normed_group (E' i')]
[Π i', normed_space 𝕜 (E' i')] (f : Π i', continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (E' i')) :
∥pi f∥ = ∥f∥ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine (op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg f) (λ m, _)),
dsimp,
rw pi_norm_le_iff,
exacts [λ i, (f i).le_of_op_norm_le m (norm_le_pi_norm f i),
mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg f) (prod_nonneg $ λ _ _, norm_nonneg _)] },
{ refine (pi_norm_le_iff (norm_nonneg _)).2 (λ i, _),
refine (op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λ m, _)),
refine le_trans _ ((pi f).le_op_norm m),
convert norm_le_pi_norm (λ j, f j m) i }
end
section
variables (𝕜 E E' G G')
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.prod` as a `linear_isometry_equiv`. -/
def prodL :
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) × (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (G × G') :=
{ to_fun := λ f, f.1.prod f.2,
inv_fun := λ f, ((continuous_linear_map.fst 𝕜 G G').comp_continuous_multilinear_map f,
(continuous_linear_map.snd 𝕜 G G').comp_continuous_multilinear_map f),
map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl,
left_inv := λ f, by ext; refl,
right_inv := λ f, by ext; refl,
norm_map' := λ f, op_norm_prod f.1 f.2 }
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.pi` as a `linear_isometry_equiv`. -/
def piₗᵢ {ι' : Type v'} [fintype ι'] {E' : ι' → Type wE'} [Π i', normed_group (E' i')]
[Π i', normed_space 𝕜 (E' i')] :
@linear_isometry_equiv 𝕜 (Π i', continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (E' i'))
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (Π i, E' i)) _ _ _
(@pi.module ι' _ 𝕜 _ _ (λ i', infer_instance)) _ :=
{ to_fun := pi,
map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl,
inv_fun := λ f i,
(@continuous_linear_map.proj 𝕜 _ _ E' _ _ _ i).comp_continuous_multilinear_map f,
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, refl },
right_inv := λ f, by { ext, refl },
norm_map' := norm_pi }
end
section restrict_scalars
variables [Π i, normed_space 𝕜' (E i)] [∀ i, is_scalar_tower 𝕜' 𝕜 (E i)]
@[simp] lemma norm_restrict_scalars : ∥f.restrict_scalars 𝕜'∥ = ∥f∥ :=
by simp only [norm_def, coe_restrict_scalars]
variable (𝕜')
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.restrict_scalars` as a `continuous_multilinear_map`. -/
def restrict_scalars_linear :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜'] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜' E G :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := restrict_scalars 𝕜',
map_add' := λ m₁ m₂, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c m, rfl } 1 $ λ f, by simp
variable {𝕜'}
lemma continuous_restrict_scalars :
continuous (restrict_scalars 𝕜' : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G →
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜' E G) :=
(restrict_scalars_linear 𝕜').continuous
end restrict_scalars
/-- The difference `f m₁ - f m₂` is controlled in terms of `∥f∥` and `∥m₁ - m₂∥`, precise version.
For a less precise but more usable version, see `norm_image_sub_le`. The bound reads
`∥f m - f m'∥ ≤
∥f∥ * ∥m 1 - m' 1∥ * max ∥m 2∥ ∥m' 2∥ * max ∥m 3∥ ∥m' 3∥ * ... * max ∥m n∥ ∥m' n∥ + ...`,
where the other terms in the sum are the same products where `1` is replaced by any `i`.-/
lemma norm_image_sub_le' (m₁ m₂ : Πi, E i) :
∥f m₁ - f m₂∥ ≤
∥f∥ * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ∥m₁ i - m₂ i∥ else max ∥m₁ j∥ ∥m₂ j∥ :=
f.to_multilinear_map.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' (norm_nonneg _) f.le_op_norm _ _
/-- The difference `f m₁ - f m₂` is controlled in terms of `∥f∥` and `∥m₁ - m₂∥`, less precise
version. For a more precise but less usable version, see `norm_image_sub_le'`.
The bound is `∥f m - f m'∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * card ι * ∥m - m'∥ * (max ∥m∥ ∥m'∥) ^ (card ι - 1)`.-/
lemma norm_image_sub_le (m₁ m₂ : Πi, E i) :
∥f m₁ - f m₂∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * (fintype.card ι) * (max ∥m₁∥ ∥m₂∥) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ∥m₁ - m₂∥ :=
f.to_multilinear_map.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound (norm_nonneg _) f.le_op_norm _ _
/-- Applying a multilinear map to a vector is continuous in both coordinates. -/
lemma continuous_eval :
continuous (λ p : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G × Π i, E i, p.1 p.2) :=
begin
apply continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 (λp, _),
apply continuous_at_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one
((∥p∥ + 1) * (fintype.card ι) * (∥p∥ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) + ∏ i, ∥p.2 i∥)
(λq hq, _),
have : 0 ≤ (max ∥q.2∥ ∥p.2∥), by simp,
have : 0 ≤ ∥p∥ + 1, by simp [le_trans zero_le_one],
have A : ∥q∥ ≤ ∥p∥ + 1 := norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball (le_of_lt hq),
have : (max ∥q.2∥ ∥p.2∥) ≤ ∥p∥ + 1 :=
le_trans (max_le_max (norm_snd_le q) (norm_snd_le p)) (by simp [A, -add_comm, zero_le_one]),
have : ∀ (i : ι), i ∈ univ → 0 ≤ ∥p.2 i∥ := λ i hi, norm_nonneg _,
calc dist (q.1 q.2) (p.1 p.2)
≤ dist (q.1 q.2) (q.1 p.2) + dist (q.1 p.2) (p.1 p.2) : dist_triangle _ _ _
... = ∥q.1 q.2 - q.1 p.2∥ + ∥q.1 p.2 - p.1 p.2∥ : by rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm]
... ≤ ∥q.1∥ * (fintype.card ι) * (max ∥q.2∥ ∥p.2∥) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ∥q.2 - p.2∥
+ ∥q.1 - p.1∥ * ∏ i, ∥p.2 i∥ :
add_le_add (norm_image_sub_le _ _ _) ((q.1 - p.1).le_op_norm p.2)
... ≤ (∥p∥ + 1) * (fintype.card ι) * (∥p∥ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1) * ∥q - p∥
+ ∥q - p∥ * ∏ i, ∥p.2 i∥ :
by apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul, le_refl, le_trans (norm_fst_le q) A, nat.cast_nonneg,
mul_nonneg, pow_le_pow_of_le_left, pow_nonneg, norm_snd_le (q - p), norm_nonneg,
norm_fst_le (q - p), prod_nonneg]
... = ((∥p∥ + 1) * (fintype.card ι) * (∥p∥ + 1) ^ (fintype.card ι - 1)
+ (∏ i, ∥p.2 i∥)) * dist q p : by { rw dist_eq_norm, ring }
end
lemma continuous_eval_left (m : Π i, E i) :
continuous (λ p : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G, p m) :=
continuous_eval.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_const)
lemma has_sum_eval
{α : Type*} {p : α → continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G} {q : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G}
(h : has_sum p q) (m : Π i, E i) : has_sum (λ a, p a m) (q m) :=
begin
dsimp [has_sum] at h ⊢,
convert ((continuous_eval_left m).tendsto _).comp h,
ext s,
simp
end
lemma tsum_eval {α : Type*} {p : α → continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G} (hp : summable p)
(m : Π i, E i) : (∑' a, p a) m = ∑' a, p a m :=
(has_sum_eval hp.has_sum m).tsum_eq.symm
open_locale topological_space
open filter
/-- If the target space is complete, the space of continuous multilinear maps with its norm is also
complete. The proof is essentially the same as for the space of continuous linear maps (modulo the
addition of `finset.prod` where needed. The duplication could be avoided by deducing the linear
case from the multilinear case via a currying isomorphism. However, this would mess up imports,
and it is more satisfactory to have the simplest case as a standalone proof. -/
instance [complete_space G] : complete_space (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :=
begin
have nonneg : ∀ (v : Π i, E i), 0 ≤ ∏ i, ∥v i∥ :=
λ v, finset.prod_nonneg (λ i hi, norm_nonneg _),
-- We show that every Cauchy sequence converges.
refine metric.complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto (λ f hf, _),
-- We now expand out the definition of a Cauchy sequence,
rcases cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0.1 hf with ⟨b, b0, b_bound, b_lim⟩,
-- and establish that the evaluation at any point `v : Π i, E i` is Cauchy.
have cau : ∀ v, cauchy_seq (λ n, f n v),
{ assume v,
apply cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0.2 ⟨λ n, b n * ∏ i, ∥v i∥, λ n, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact mul_nonneg (b0 n) (nonneg v) },
{ assume n m N hn hm,
rw dist_eq_norm,
apply le_trans ((f n - f m).le_op_norm v) _,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (b_bound n m N hn hm) (nonneg v) },
{ simpa using b_lim.mul tendsto_const_nhds } },
-- We assemble the limits points of those Cauchy sequences
-- (which exist as `G` is complete)
-- into a function which we call `F`.
choose F hF using λv, cauchy_seq_tendsto_of_complete (cau v),
-- Next, we show that this `F` is multilinear,
let Fmult : multilinear_map 𝕜 E G :=
{ to_fun := F,
map_add' := λ v i x y, begin
have A := hF (function.update v i (x + y)),
have B := (hF (function.update v i x)).add (hF (function.update v i y)),
simp at A B,
exact tendsto_nhds_unique A B
end,
map_smul' := λ v i c x, begin
have A := hF (function.update v i (c • x)),
have B := filter.tendsto.smul (@tendsto_const_nhds _ ℕ _ c _) (hF (function.update v i x)),
simp at A B,
exact tendsto_nhds_unique A B
end },
-- and that `F` has norm at most `(b 0 + ∥f 0∥)`.
have Fnorm : ∀ v, ∥F v∥ ≤ (b 0 + ∥f 0∥) * ∏ i, ∥v i∥,
{ assume v,
have A : ∀ n, ∥f n v∥ ≤ (b 0 + ∥f 0∥) * ∏ i, ∥v i∥,
{ assume n,
apply le_trans ((f n).le_op_norm _) _,
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (nonneg v),
calc ∥f n∥ = ∥(f n - f 0) + f 0∥ : by { congr' 1, abel }
... ≤ ∥f n - f 0∥ + ∥f 0∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... ≤ b 0 + ∥f 0∥ : begin
apply add_le_add_right,
simpa [dist_eq_norm] using b_bound n 0 0 (zero_le _) (zero_le _)
end },
exact le_of_tendsto (hF v).norm (eventually_of_forall A) },
-- Thus `F` is continuous, and we propose that as the limit point of our original Cauchy sequence.
let Fcont := Fmult.mk_continuous _ Fnorm,
use Fcont,
-- Our last task is to establish convergence to `F` in norm.
have : ∀ n, ∥f n - Fcont∥ ≤ b n,
{ assume n,
apply op_norm_le_bound _ (b0 n) (λ v, _),
have A : ∀ᶠ m in at_top, ∥(f n - f m) v∥ ≤ b n * ∏ i, ∥v i∥,
{ refine eventually_at_top.2 ⟨n, λ m hm, _⟩,
apply le_trans ((f n - f m).le_op_norm _) _,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (b_bound n m n (le_refl _) hm) (nonneg v) },
have B : tendsto (λ m, ∥(f n - f m) v∥) at_top (𝓝 (∥(f n - Fcont) v∥)) :=
tendsto.norm (tendsto_const_nhds.sub (hF v)),
exact le_of_tendsto B A },
erw tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
exact squeeze_zero (λ n, norm_nonneg _) this b_lim,
end
end continuous_multilinear_map
/-- If a continuous multilinear map is constructed from a multilinear map via the constructor
`mk_continuous`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor if it is
nonnegative. -/
lemma multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) : ∥f.mk_continuous C H∥ ≤ C :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ hC (λm, H m)
/-- If a continuous multilinear map is constructed from a multilinear map via the constructor
`mk_continuous`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor if it is
nonnegative. -/
lemma multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le' (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ}
(H : ∀ m, ∥f m∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) : ∥f.mk_continuous C H∥ ≤ max C 0 :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) $
λ m, (H m).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _)
(prod_nonneg $ λ _ _, norm_nonneg _)
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `fin n`) and a subset
`s` of `k` of these variables, one gets a new continuous multilinear map on `fin k` by varying
these variables, and fixing the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by
`f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit
identification between `fin k` and `s` that we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : (G [×n]→L[𝕜] G' : _))
(s : finset (fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) : G [×k]→L[𝕜] G' :=
(f.to_multilinear_map.restr s hk z).mk_continuous
(∥f∥ * ∥z∥^(n-k)) $ λ v, multilinear_map.restr_norm_le _ _ _ _ f.le_op_norm _
lemma norm_restr {k n : ℕ} (f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') (s : finset (fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) :
∥f.restr s hk z∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∥z∥ ^ (n - k) :=
begin
apply multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le,
exact mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
end
section
variables (𝕜 ι) (A : Type*) [normed_comm_ring A] [normed_algebra 𝕜 A]
/-- The continuous multilinear map on `A^ι`, where `A` is a normed commutative algebra
over `𝕜`, associating to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin`. -/
protected def mk_pi_algebra : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : ι, A) A :=
@multilinear_map.mk_continuous 𝕜 ι (λ i : ι, A) A _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A) (if nonempty ι then 1 else ∥(1 : A)∥) $
begin
intro m,
by_cases hι : nonempty ι,
{ resetI, simp [hι, norm_prod_le' univ univ_nonempty] },
{ simp [eq_empty_of_not_nonempty hι univ, hι] }
end
variables {A 𝕜 ι}
@[simp] lemma mk_pi_algebra_apply (m : ι → A) :
continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A m = ∏ i, m i :=
rfl
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_le [nonempty ι] :
∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A∥ ≤ 1 :=
calc ∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A∥ ≤ if nonempty ι then 1 else ∥(1 : A)∥ :
multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (by split_ifs; simp [zero_le_one]) _
... = _ : if_pos ‹_›
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_of_empty (h : ¬nonempty ι) :
∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A∥ = ∥(1 : A)∥ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
calc ∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A∥ ≤ if nonempty ι then 1 else ∥(1 : A)∥ :
multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (by split_ifs; simp [zero_le_one]) _
... = ∥(1 : A)∥ : if_neg ‹_›,
convert ratio_le_op_norm _ (λ _, 1); [skip, apply_instance],
simp [eq_empty_of_not_nonempty h univ]
end
@[simp] lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra [norm_one_class A] :
∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra 𝕜 ι A∥ = 1 :=
begin
by_cases hι : nonempty ι,
{ resetI,
refine le_antisymm norm_mk_pi_algebra_le _,
convert ratio_le_op_norm _ (λ _, 1); [skip, apply_instance],
simp },
{ simp [norm_mk_pi_algebra_of_empty hι] }
end
end
section
variables (𝕜 n) (A : Type*) [normed_ring A] [normed_algebra 𝕜 A]
/-- The continuous multilinear map on `A^n`, where `A` is a normed algebra over `𝕜`, associating to
`m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also: `multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra`. -/
protected def mk_pi_algebra_fin : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, A) A :=
@multilinear_map.mk_continuous 𝕜 (fin n) (λ i : fin n, A) A _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 n A) (nat.cases_on n ∥(1 : A)∥ (λ _, 1)) $
begin
intro m,
cases n,
{ simp },
{ have : @list.of_fn A n.succ m ≠ [] := by simp,
simpa [← fin.prod_of_fn] using list.norm_prod_le' this }
end
variables {A 𝕜 n}
@[simp] lemma mk_pi_algebra_fin_apply (m : fin n → A) :
continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 n A m = (list.of_fn m).prod :=
rfl
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_succ_le :
∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 n.succ A∥ ≤ 1 :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_le_of_pos (hn : 0 < n) :
∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 n A∥ ≤ 1 :=
by cases n; [exact hn.false.elim, exact norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_succ_le]
lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_zero :
∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 0 A∥ = ∥(1 : A)∥ :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _) _) _,
convert ratio_le_op_norm _ (λ _, 1); [simp, apply_instance]
end
@[simp] lemma norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin [norm_one_class A] :
∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra_fin 𝕜 n A∥ = 1 :=
begin
cases n,
{ simp [norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_zero] },
{ refine le_antisymm norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_succ_le _,
convert ratio_le_op_norm _ (λ _, 1); [skip, apply_instance],
simp }
end
end
variables (𝕜 ι)
/-- The canonical continuous multilinear map on `𝕜^ι`, associating to `m` the product of all the
`m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module) -/
protected def mk_pi_field (z : G) : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : ι), 𝕜) G :=
@multilinear_map.mk_continuous 𝕜 ι (λ(i : ι), 𝕜) G _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring 𝕜 ι z) (∥z∥)
(λ m, by simp only [multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring_apply, norm_smul, normed_field.norm_prod,
mul_comm])
variables {𝕜 ι}
@[simp] lemma mk_pi_field_apply (z : G) (m : ι → 𝕜) :
(continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z : (ι → 𝕜) → G) m = (∏ i, m i) • z := rfl
lemma mk_pi_field_apply_one_eq_self (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : ι), 𝕜) G) :
continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι (f (λi, 1)) = f :=
to_multilinear_map_inj f.to_multilinear_map.mk_pi_ring_apply_one_eq_self
variables (𝕜 ι G)
/-- Continuous multilinear maps on `𝕜^n` with values in `G` are in bijection with `G`, as such a
continuous multilinear map is completely determined by its value on the constant vector made of
ones. We register this bijection as a linear equivalence in
`continuous_multilinear_map.pi_field_equiv_aux`. The continuous linear equivalence is
`continuous_multilinear_map.pi_field_equiv`. -/
protected def pi_field_equiv_aux : G ≃ₗ[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : ι), 𝕜) G) :=
{ to_fun := λ z, continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z,
inv_fun := λ f, f (λi, 1),
map_add' := λ z z', by { ext m, simp [smul_add] },
map_smul' := λ c z, by { ext m, simp [smul_smul, mul_comm] },
left_inv := λ z, by simp,
right_inv := λ f, f.mk_pi_field_apply_one_eq_self }
/-- Continuous multilinear maps on `𝕜^n` with values in `G` are in bijection with `G`, as such a
continuous multilinear map is completely determined by its value on the constant vector made of
ones. We register this bijection as a continuous linear equivalence in
`continuous_multilinear_map.pi_field_equiv`. -/
protected def pi_field_equiv : G ≃L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : ι), 𝕜) G) :=
{ continuous_to_fun := begin
refine (continuous_multilinear_map.pi_field_equiv_aux 𝕜 ι G).to_linear_map.continuous_of_bound
(1 : ℝ) (λz, _),
rw one_mul,
change ∥continuous_multilinear_map.mk_pi_field 𝕜 ι z∥ ≤ ∥z∥,
exact multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _) _
end,
continuous_inv_fun := begin
refine
(continuous_multilinear_map.pi_field_equiv_aux 𝕜 ι G).symm.to_linear_map.continuous_of_bound
(1 : ℝ) (λf, _),
rw one_mul,
change ∥f (λi, 1)∥ ≤ ∥f∥,
apply @continuous_multilinear_map.unit_le_op_norm 𝕜 ι (λ (i : ι), 𝕜) G _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f,
simp [pi_norm_le_iff zero_le_one, le_refl]
end,
.. continuous_multilinear_map.pi_field_equiv_aux 𝕜 ι G }
end continuous_multilinear_map
namespace continuous_linear_map
lemma norm_comp_continuous_multilinear_map_le (g : G →L[𝕜] G')
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) :
∥g.comp_continuous_multilinear_map f∥ ≤ ∥g∥ * ∥f∥ :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) $ λ m,
calc ∥g (f m)∥ ≤ ∥g∥ * (∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) : g.le_op_norm_of_le $ f.le_op_norm _
... = _ : (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
/-- `continuous_linear_map.comp_continuous_multilinear_map` as a bundled continuous bilinear map. -/
def comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL :
(G →L[𝕜] G') →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G' :=
linear_map.mk_continuous₂
(linear_map.mk₂ 𝕜 comp_continuous_multilinear_map (λ f₁ f₂ g, rfl) (λ c f g, rfl)
(λ f g₁ g₂, by { ext1, apply f.map_add }) (λ c f g, by { ext1, simp }))
1 $ λ f g, by { rw one_mul, exact f.norm_comp_continuous_multilinear_map_le g }
/-- Flip arguments in `f : G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G'` to get
`continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (G →L[𝕜] G')` -/
def flip_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (G →L[𝕜] G') :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ m, linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ x, f x m,
map_add' := λ x y, by simp only [map_add, continuous_multilinear_map.add_apply],
map_smul' := λ c x, by simp only [continuous_multilinear_map.smul_apply, map_smul]}
(∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) $ λ x,
by { rw mul_right_comm, exact (f x).le_of_op_norm_le _ (f.le_op_norm x) },
map_add' := λ m i x y,
by { ext1, simp only [add_apply, continuous_multilinear_map.map_add, linear_map.coe_mk,
linear_map.mk_continuous_apply]},
map_smul' := λ m i c x,
by { ext1, simp only [coe_smul', continuous_multilinear_map.map_smul, linear_map.coe_mk,
linear_map.mk_continuous_apply, pi.smul_apply]} }
∥f∥ $ λ m,
linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _
(mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg f) (prod_nonneg $ λ i hi, norm_nonneg (m i))) _
end continuous_linear_map
open continuous_multilinear_map
namespace multilinear_map
/-- Given a map `f : G →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E G'` and an estimate
`H : ∀ x m, ∥f x m∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥`, construct a continuous linear
map from `G` to `continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G'`.
In order to lift, e.g., a map `f : (multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G'`
to a map `(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G) →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G'`,
one can apply this construction to `f.comp continuous_multilinear_map.to_multilinear_map_linear`
which is a linear map from `continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G` to `multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G'`. -/
def mk_continuous_linear (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ x m, ∥f x m∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G' :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ x, (f x).mk_continuous (C * ∥x∥) $ H x,
map_add' := λ x y, by { ext1, simp },
map_smul' := λ c x, by { ext1, simp } }
(max C 0) $ λ x, ((f x).mk_continuous_norm_le' _).trans_eq $
by rw [max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ (norm_nonneg x), zero_mul]
lemma mk_continuous_linear_norm_le' (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ x m, ∥f x m∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
∥mk_continuous_linear f C H∥ ≤ max C 0 :=
begin
dunfold mk_continuous_linear,
exact linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (le_max_right _ _) _
end
lemma mk_continuous_linear_norm_le (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] multilinear_map 𝕜 E G') {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ x m, ∥f x m∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) :
∥mk_continuous_linear f C H∥ ≤ C :=
(mk_continuous_linear_norm_le' f C H).trans_eq (max_eq_left hC)
/-- Given a map `f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G)` and an estimate
`H : ∀ m m', ∥f m m'∥ ≤ C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ * ∏ i, ∥m' i∥`, upgrade all `multilinear_map`s in the type to
`continuous_multilinear_map`s. -/
def mk_continuous_multilinear (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G)) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ∥f m₁ m₂∥ ≤ C * (∏ i, ∥m₁ i∥) * ∏ i, ∥m₂ i∥) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G) :=
mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ m, mk_continuous (f m) (C * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) $ H m,
map_add' := λ m i x y, by { ext1, simp },
map_smul' := λ m i c x, by { ext1, simp } }
(max C 0) $ λ m, ((f m).mk_continuous_norm_le' _).trans_eq $
by { rw [max_mul_of_nonneg, zero_mul], exact prod_nonneg (λ _ _, norm_nonneg _) }
@[simp] lemma mk_continuous_multilinear_apply (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G))
{C : ℝ} (H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ∥f m₁ m₂∥ ≤ C * (∏ i, ∥m₁ i∥) * ∏ i, ∥m₂ i∥) (m : Π i, E i) :
⇑(mk_continuous_multilinear f C H m) = f m :=
rfl
lemma mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le' (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G)) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ∥f m₁ m₂∥ ≤ C * (∏ i, ∥m₁ i∥) * ∏ i, ∥m₂ i∥) :
∥mk_continuous_multilinear f C H∥ ≤ max C 0 :=
begin
dunfold mk_continuous_multilinear,
exact mk_continuous_norm_le _ (le_max_right _ _) _
end
lemma mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le (f : multilinear_map 𝕜 E (multilinear_map 𝕜 E' G)) {C : ℝ}
(hC : 0 ≤ C) (H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ∥f m₁ m₂∥ ≤ C * (∏ i, ∥m₁ i∥) * ∏ i, ∥m₂ i∥) :
∥mk_continuous_multilinear f C H∥ ≤ C :=
(mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le' f C H).trans_eq (max_eq_left hC)
end multilinear_map
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
lemma norm_comp_continuous_linear_le (g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
∥g.comp_continuous_linear_map f∥ ≤ ∥g∥ * ∏ i, ∥f i∥ :=
op_norm_le_bound _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) $ prod_nonneg $ λ i hi, norm_nonneg _) $ λ m,
calc ∥g (λ i, f i (m i))∥ ≤ ∥g∥ * ∏ i, ∥f i (m i)∥ : g.le_op_norm _
... ≤ ∥g∥ * ∏ i, (∥f i∥ * ∥m i∥) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(prod_le_prod (λ _ _, norm_nonneg _) (λ i hi, (f i).le_op_norm (m i))) (norm_nonneg g)
... = (∥g∥ * ∏ i, ∥f i∥) * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ : by rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
/-- `continuous_multilinear_map.comp_continuous_linear_map` as a bundled continuous linear map.
This implementation fixes `f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i`.
TODO: Actually, the map is multilinear in `f` but an attempt to formalize this failed because of
issues with class instances. -/
def comp_continuous_linear_mapL (f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G →L[𝕜] continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E G :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ to_fun := λ g, g.comp_continuous_linear_map f,
map_add' := λ g₁ g₂, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c g, rfl }
(∏ i, ∥f i∥) $ λ g, (norm_comp_continuous_linear_le _ _).trans_eq (mul_comm _ _)
@[simp] lemma comp_continuous_linear_mapL_apply (g : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
comp_continuous_linear_mapL f g = g.comp_continuous_linear_map f :=
rfl
lemma norm_comp_continuous_linear_mapL_le (f : Π i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) :
∥@comp_continuous_linear_mapL 𝕜 ι E E₁ G _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f∥ ≤ (∏ i, ∥f i∥) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (prod_nonneg $ λ i _, norm_nonneg _) _
end continuous_multilinear_map
section currying
/-!
### Currying
We associate to a continuous multilinear map in `n+1` variables (i.e., based on `fin n.succ`) two
curried functions, named `f.curry_left` (which is a continuous linear map on `E 0` taking values
in continuous multilinear maps in `n` variables) and `f.curry_right` (which is a continuous
multilinear map in `n` variables taking values in continuous linear maps on `E (last n)`).
The inverse operations are called `uncurry_left` and `uncurry_right`.
We also register continuous linear equiv versions of these correspondences, in
`continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv` and `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv`.
-/
open fin function
lemma continuous_linear_map.norm_map_tail_le
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) (m : Πi, Ei i) :
∥f (m 0) (tail m)∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ :=
calc
∥f (m 0) (tail m)∥ ≤ ∥f (m 0)∥ * ∏ i, ∥(tail m) i∥ : (f (m 0)).le_op_norm _
... ≤ (∥f∥ * ∥m 0∥) * ∏ i, ∥(tail m) i∥ :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (f.le_op_norm _) (prod_nonneg (λi hi, norm_nonneg _))
... = ∥f∥ * (∥m 0∥ * ∏ i, ∥(tail m) i∥) : by ring
... = ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ : by { rw prod_univ_succ, refl }
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.norm_map_init_le
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G))
(m : Πi, Ei i) :
∥f (init m) (m (last n))∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ :=
calc
∥f (init m) (m (last n))∥ ≤ ∥f (init m)∥ * ∥m (last n)∥ : (f (init m)).le_op_norm _
... ≤ (∥f∥ * (∏ i, ∥(init m) i∥)) * ∥m (last n)∥ :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (f.le_op_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
... = ∥f∥ * ((∏ i, ∥(init m) i∥) * ∥m (last n)∥) : mul_assoc _ _ _
... = ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ : by { rw prod_univ_cast_succ, refl }
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.norm_map_cons_le
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (x : Ei 0) (m : Π(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) :
∥f (cons x m)∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∥x∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ :=
calc
∥f (cons x m)∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥cons x m i∥ : f.le_op_norm _
... = (∥f∥ * ∥x∥) * ∏ i, ∥m i∥ : by { rw prod_univ_succ, simp [mul_assoc] }
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.norm_map_snoc_le
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (m : Π(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (x : Ei (last n)) :
∥f (snoc m x)∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * (∏ i, ∥m i∥) * ∥x∥ :=
calc
∥f (snoc m x)∥ ≤ ∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥snoc m x i∥ : f.le_op_norm _
... = ∥f∥ * (∏ i, ∥m i∥) * ∥x∥ : by { rw prod_univ_cast_succ, simp [mul_assoc] }
/-! #### Left currying -/
/-- Given a continuous linear map `f` from `E 0` to continuous multilinear maps on `n` variables,
construct the corresponding continuous multilinear map on `n+1` variables obtained by concatenating
the variables, given by `m ↦ f (m 0) (tail m)`-/
def continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G :=
(@linear_map.uncurry_left 𝕜 n Ei G _ _ _ _ _
(continuous_multilinear_map.to_multilinear_map_linear.comp f.to_linear_map)).mk_continuous
(∥f∥) (λm, continuous_linear_map.norm_map_tail_le f m)
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left_apply
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) (m : Πi, Ei i) :
f.uncurry_left m = f (m 0) (tail m) := rfl
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` in `n+1` variables, split the first variable to obtain
a continuous linear map into continuous multilinear maps in `n` variables, given by
`x ↦ (m ↦ f (cons x m))`. -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) :
Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G) :=
linear_map.mk_continuous
{ -- define a linear map into `n` continuous multilinear maps from an `n+1` continuous multilinear
-- map
to_fun := λx, (f.to_multilinear_map.curry_left x).mk_continuous
(∥f∥ * ∥x∥) (f.norm_map_cons_le x),
map_add' := λx y, by { ext m, exact f.cons_add m x y },
map_smul' := λc x, by { ext m, exact f.cons_smul m c x } }
-- then register its continuity thanks to its boundedness properties.
(∥f∥) (λx, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) _)
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (x : Ei 0) (m : Π(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) :
f.curry_left x m = f (cons x m) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.curry_uncurry_left
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) :
f.uncurry_left.curry_left = f :=
begin
ext m x,
simp only [tail_cons, continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left_apply,
continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left_apply],
rw cons_zero
end
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) : f.curry_left.uncurry_left = f :=
continuous_multilinear_map.to_multilinear_map_inj $ f.to_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left
variables (𝕜 Ei G)
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin (n+1)), E i` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of continuous linear maps from `E 0` to the space of continuous multilinear maps on
`Π(i : fin n), E i.succ `, by separating the first variable. We register this isomorphism in
`continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 E E₂`. The algebraic version (without topology) is given
in `multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 E E₂`.
The direct and inverse maps are given by `f.uncurry_left` and `f.curry_left`. Use these
unless you need the full framework of linear isometric equivs. -/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv :
(Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_bounds
{ to_fun := continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left,
map_add' := λf₁ f₂, by { ext m, refl },
map_smul' := λc f, by { ext m, refl },
inv_fun := continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left,
left_inv := continuous_linear_map.curry_uncurry_left,
right_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left }
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
(λ f, linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
variables {𝕜 Ei G}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv_apply
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.succ) G)) (v : Π i, Ei i) :
continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 Ei G f v = f (v 0) (tail v) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv_symm_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (x : Ei 0) (v : Π i : fin n, Ei i.succ) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).symm f x v = f (cons x v) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left_norm
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) : ∥f.curry_left∥ = ∥f∥ :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).symm.norm_map f
@[simp] lemma continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left_norm
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.succ) G)) :
∥f.uncurry_left∥ = ∥f∥ :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).norm_map f
/-! #### Right currying -/
/-- Given a continuous linear map `f` from continuous multilinear maps on `n` variables to
continuous linear maps on `E 0`, construct the corresponding continuous multilinear map on `n+1`
variables obtained by concatenating the variables, given by `m ↦ f (init m) (m (last n))`. -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G :=
let f' : multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →ₗ[𝕜] G) :=
{ to_fun := λ m, (f m).to_linear_map,
map_add' := λ m i x y, by simp,
map_smul' := λ m i c x, by simp } in
(@multilinear_map.uncurry_right 𝕜 n Ei G _ _ _ _ _ f').mk_continuous
(∥f∥) (λm, f.norm_map_init_le m)
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G))
(m : Πi, Ei i) :
f.uncurry_right m = f (init m) (m (last n)) := rfl
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` in `n+1` variables, split the last variable to obtain
a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables into continuous linear maps, given by
`m ↦ (x ↦ f (snoc m x))`. -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G) :=
let f' : multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G) :=
{ to_fun := λm, (f.to_multilinear_map.curry_right m).mk_continuous
(∥f∥ * ∏ i, ∥m i∥) $ λx, f.norm_map_snoc_le m x,
map_add' := λ m i x y, by { simp, refl },
map_smul' := λ m i c x, by { simp, refl } } in
f'.mk_continuous (∥f∥) (λm, linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _
(mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (prod_nonneg (λj hj, norm_nonneg _))) _)
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) (m : Π i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (x : Ei (last n)) :
f.curry_right m x = f (snoc m x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_uncurry_right
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)) :
f.uncurry_right.curry_right = f :=
begin
ext m x,
simp only [snoc_last, continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right_apply,
continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right_apply],
rw init_snoc
end
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_right
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) : f.curry_right.uncurry_right = f :=
by { ext m, simp }
variables (𝕜 Ei G)
/--
The space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin (n+1)), Ei i` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ` with values in the space
of continuous linear maps on `Ei (last n)`, by separating the last variable. We register this
isomorphism as a continuous linear equiv in `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G`.
The algebraic version (without topology) is given in `multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G`.
The direct and inverse maps are given by `f.uncurry_right` and `f.curry_right`. Use these
unless you need the full framework of linear isometric equivs.
-/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv :
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
(continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_bounds
{ to_fun := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right,
map_add' := λf₁ f₂, by { ext m, refl },
map_smul' := λc f, by { ext m, refl },
inv_fun := continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right,
left_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.curry_uncurry_right,
right_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_right }
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
variables (n G')
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin (n+1)), G` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : fin n), G` with values in the space
of continuous linear maps on `G`, by separating the last variable. We register this
isomorphism as a continuous linear equiv in `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n G G'`.
For a version allowing dependent types, see `continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv`. When there
are no dependent types, use the primed version as it helps Lean a lot for unification.
The direct and inverse maps are given by `f.uncurry_right` and `f.curry_right`. Use these
unless you need the full framework of linear isometric equivs. -/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' :
(G [×n]→L[𝕜] (G →L[𝕜] G')) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (G [×n.succ]→L[𝕜] G') :=
continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 (λ (i : fin n.succ), G) G'
variables {n 𝕜 G Ei G'}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv_apply
(f : (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ(i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)))
(v : Π i, Ei i) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G) f v = f (init v) (v (last n)) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv_symm_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G)
(v : Π (i : fin n), Ei i.cast_succ) (x : Ei (last n)) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).symm f v x = f (snoc v x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv_apply'
(f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] (G →L[𝕜] G')) (v : Π (i : fin n.succ), G) :
continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n G G' f v = f (init v) (v (last n)) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv_symm_apply'
(f : G [×n.succ]→L[𝕜] G') (v : Π (i : fin n), G) (x : G) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n G G').symm f v x = f (snoc v x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry_right_norm
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 Ei G) : ∥f.curry_right∥ = ∥f∥ :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).symm.norm_map f
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_right_norm
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ i : fin n, Ei i.cast_succ) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G)) :
∥f.uncurry_right∥ = ∥f∥ :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 Ei G).norm_map f
/-!
#### Currying with `0` variables
The space of multilinear maps with `0` variables is trivial: such a multilinear map is just an
arbitrary constant (note that multilinear maps in `0` variables need not map `0` to `0`!).
Therefore, the space of continuous multilinear maps on `(fin 0) → G` with values in `E₂` is
isomorphic (and even isometric) to `E₂`. As this is the zeroth step in the construction of iterated
derivatives, we register this isomorphism. -/
section
local attribute [instance] unique.subsingleton
variables {𝕜 G G'}
/-- Associating to a continuous multilinear map in `0` variables the unique value it takes. -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin 0), G) G') : G' := f 0
variables (𝕜 G)
/-- Associating to an element `x` of a vector space `E₂` the continuous multilinear map in `0`
variables taking the (unique) value `x` -/
def continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 (x : G') : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G' :=
{ to_fun := λm, x,
map_add' := λ m i, fin.elim0 i,
map_smul' := λ m i, fin.elim0 i,
cont := continuous_const }
variable {G}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry0_apply (x : G') (m : (fin 0) → G) :
continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G x m = x := rfl
variable {𝕜}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_apply (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') :
f.uncurry0 = f 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.apply_zero_curry0 (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') {x : fin 0 → G} :
continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G (f x) = f :=
by { ext m, simp [(subsingleton.elim _ _ : x = m)] }
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_curry0 (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') :
continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G (f.uncurry0) = f :=
by simp
variables (𝕜 G)
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry0_uncurry0 (x : G') :
(continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G x).uncurry0 = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.curry0_norm (x : G') :
∥continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ exact continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λm, by simp) },
{ simpa using (continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G x).le_op_norm 0 }
end
variables {𝕜 G}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_map.fin0_apply_norm (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') {x : fin 0 → G} :
∥f x∥ = ∥f∥ :=
begin
have : x = 0 := subsingleton.elim _ _, subst this,
refine le_antisymm (by simpa using f.le_op_norm 0) _,
have : ∥continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G (f.uncurry0)∥ ≤ ∥f.uncurry0∥ :=
continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) (λm,
by simp [-continuous_multilinear_map.apply_zero_curry0]),
simpa
end
lemma continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_norm (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') : ∥f.uncurry0∥ = ∥f∥ :=
by simp
variables (𝕜 G G')
/-- The continuous linear isomorphism between elements of a normed space, and continuous multilinear
maps in `0` variables with values in this normed space.
The direct and inverse maps are `uncurry0` and `curry0`. Use these unless you need the full
framework of linear isometric equivs. -/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 : (G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G' :=
{ to_fun := λf, continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0 f,
inv_fun := λf, continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 G f,
map_add' := λf g, rfl,
map_smul' := λc f, rfl,
left_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_curry0,
right_inv := continuous_multilinear_map.curry0_uncurry0 𝕜 G,
norm_map' := continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_norm }
variables {𝕜 G G'}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0_apply (f : G [×0]→L[𝕜] G') :
continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 G G' f = f 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0_symm_apply (x : G') (v : (fin 0) → G) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 G G').symm x v = x := rfl
end
/-! #### With 1 variable -/
variables (𝕜 G G')
/-- Continuous multilinear maps from `G^1` to `G'` are isomorphic with continuous linear maps from
`G` to `G'`. -/
def continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 : (G [×1]→L[𝕜] G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (G →L[𝕜] G') :=
(continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv 𝕜 (λ (i : fin 1), G) G').symm.trans
(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 G (G →L[𝕜] G'))
variables {𝕜 G G'}
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1_apply (f : G [×1]→L[𝕜] G') (x : G) :
continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 G G' f x = f (fin.snoc 0 x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1_symm_apply
(f : G →L[𝕜] G') (v : (fin 1) → G) :
(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 G G').symm f v = f (v 0) := rfl
namespace continuous_multilinear_map
variables (𝕜 G G')
/-- An equivalence of the index set defines a linear isometric equivalence between the spaces
of multilinear maps. -/
def dom_dom_congr (σ : ι ≃ ι') :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ _ : ι, G) G' ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ _ : ι', G) G' :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_bounds
{ to_fun := λ f, (multilinear_map.dom_dom_congr σ f.to_multilinear_map).mk_continuous ∥f∥ $
λ m, (f.le_op_norm (λ i, m (σ i))).trans_eq $ by rw [← σ.prod_comp],
inv_fun := λ f, (multilinear_map.dom_dom_congr σ.symm f.to_multilinear_map).mk_continuous ∥f∥ $
λ m, (f.le_op_norm (λ i, m (σ.symm i))).trans_eq $ by rw [← σ.symm.prod_comp],
left_inv := λ f, ext $ λ m, congr_arg f $ by simp only [σ.symm_apply_apply],
right_inv := λ f, ext $ λ m, congr_arg f $ by simp only [σ.apply_symm_apply],
map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl }
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
variables {𝕜 G G'}
section
variable [decidable_eq (ι ⊕ ι')]
/-- A continuous multilinear map with variables indexed by `ι ⊕ ι'` defines a continuous multilinear
map with variables indexed by `ι` taking values in the space of continuous multilinear maps with
variables indexed by `ι'`. -/
def curry_sum (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι ⊕ ι', G) G') :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι, G) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι', G) G') :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous_multilinear (multilinear_map.curry_sum f.to_multilinear_map) (∥f∥) $
λ m m', by simpa [fintype.prod_sum_type, mul_assoc] using f.le_op_norm (sum.elim m m')
@[simp] lemma curry_sum_apply (f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι ⊕ ι', G) G')
(m : ι → G) (m' : ι' → G) :
f.curry_sum m m' = f (sum.elim m m') :=
rfl
/-- A continuous multilinear map with variables indexed by `ι` taking values in the space of
continuous multilinear maps with variables indexed by `ι'` defines a continuous multilinear map with
variables indexed by `ι ⊕ ι'`. -/
def uncurry_sum
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι, G) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι', G) G')) :
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι ⊕ ι', G) G' :=
multilinear_map.mk_continuous
(to_multilinear_map_linear.comp_multilinear_map f.to_multilinear_map).uncurry_sum (∥f∥) $ λ m,
by simpa [fintype.prod_sum_type, mul_assoc]
using (f (m ∘ sum.inl)).le_of_op_norm_le (m ∘ sum.inr) (f.le_op_norm _)
@[simp] lemma uncurry_sum_apply
(f : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι, G) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι', G) G'))
(m : ι ⊕ ι' → G) :
f.uncurry_sum m = f (m ∘ sum.inl) (m ∘ sum.inr) :=
rfl
variables (𝕜 ι ι' G G')
/-- Linear isometric equivalence between the space of continuous multilinear maps with variables
indexed by `ι ⊕ ι'` and the space of continuous multilinear maps with variables indexed by `ι`
taking values in the space of continuous multilinear maps with variables indexed by `ι'`.
The forward and inverse functions are `continuous_multilinear_map.curry_sum`
and `continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_sum`. Use this definition only if you need
some properties of `linear_isometry_equiv`. -/
def curry_sum_equiv : continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι ⊕ ι', G) G' ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι, G) (continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ x : ι', G) G') :=
linear_isometry_equiv.of_bounds
{ to_fun := curry_sum,
inv_fun := uncurry_sum,
map_add' := λ f g, by { ext, refl },
map_smul' := λ c f, by { ext, refl },
left_inv := λ f, by { ext m, exact congr_arg f (sum.elim_comp_inl_inr m) },
right_inv := λ f, by { ext m₁ m₂, change f _ _ = f _ _,
rw [sum.elim_comp_inl, sum.elim_comp_inr] } }
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
(λ f, multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _)
end
section
variables (𝕜 G G') {k l : ℕ} {s : finset (fin n)} [decidable_pred (s : set (fin n))]
/-- If `s : finset (fin n)` is a finite set of cardinality `k` and its complement has cardinality
`l`, then the space of continuous multilinear maps `G [×n]→L[𝕜] G'` of `n` variables is isomorphic
to the space of continuous multilinear maps `G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G'` of `k` variables taking
values in the space of continuous multilinear maps of `l` variables. -/
def curry_fin_finset {k l n : ℕ} {s : finset (fin n)} [decidable_pred (s : set (fin n))]
(hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l) :
(G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G') :=
(dom_dom_congr 𝕜 G G' (fin_sum_equiv_of_finset hk hl).symm).trans
(curry_sum_equiv 𝕜 (fin k) (fin l) G G')
variables {𝕜 G G'}
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_apply (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') (mk : fin k → G) (ml : fin l → G) :
curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl f mk ml =
f (λ i, sum.elim mk ml ((fin_sum_equiv_of_finset hk hl).symm i)) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_symm_apply (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G') (m : fin n → G) :
(curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl).symm f m =
f (λ i, m $ fin_sum_equiv_of_finset hk hl (sum.inl i))
(λ i, m $ fin_sum_equiv_of_finset hk hl (sum.inr i)) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_symm_apply_piecewise_const (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G') (x y : G) :
(curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl).symm f (s.piecewise (λ _, x) (λ _, y)) = f (λ _, x) (λ _, y) :=
multilinear_map.curry_fin_finset_symm_apply_piecewise_const hk hl _ x y
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_symm_apply_const (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×k]→L[𝕜] G [×l]→L[𝕜] G') (x : G) :
(curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl).symm f (λ _, x) = f (λ _, x) (λ _, x) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma curry_fin_finset_apply_const (hk : s.card = k) (hl : sᶜ.card = l)
(f : G [×n]→L[𝕜] G') (x y : G) :
curry_fin_finset 𝕜 G G' hk hl f (λ _, x) (λ _, y) = f (s.piecewise (λ _, x) (λ _, y)) :=
begin
refine (curry_fin_finset_symm_apply_piecewise_const hk hl _ _ _).symm.trans _, -- `rw` fails
rw linear_isometry_equiv.symm_apply_apply
end
end
end continuous_multilinear_map
end currying
|
2121184aaf1d7315cb7a0400a084b0f3259eaa61 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/ring_theory/witt_vector/truncated.lean | 6bc9fee887a856ab4f4efe1db99720986c8b29c6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,692 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import ring_theory.witt_vector.init_tail
/-!
# Truncated Witt vectors
The ring of truncated Witt vectors (of length `n`) is a quotient of the ring of Witt vectors.
It retains the first `n` coefficients of each Witt vector.
In this file, we set up the basic quotient API for this ring.
The ring of Witt vectors is the projective limit of all the rings of truncated Witt vectors.
## Main declarations
- `truncated_witt_vector`: the underlying type of the ring of truncated Witt vectors
- `truncated_witt_vector.comm_ring`: the ring structure on truncated Witt vectors
- `witt_vector.truncate`: the quotient homomorphism that truncates a Witt vector,
to obtain a truncated Witt vector
- `truncated_witt_vector.truncate`: the homomorphism that truncates
a truncated Witt vector of length `n` to one of length `m` (for some `m ≤ n`)
- `witt_vector.lift`: the unique ring homomorphism into the ring of Witt vectors
that is compatible with a family of ring homomorphisms to the truncated Witt vectors:
this realizes the ring of Witt vectors as projective limit of the rings of truncated Witt vectors
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open function (injective surjective)
noncomputable theory
variables {p : ℕ} [hp : fact p.prime] (n : ℕ) (R : Type*)
local notation `𝕎` := witt_vector p -- type as `\bbW`
/--
A truncated Witt vector over `R` is a vector of elements of `R`,
i.e., the first `n` coefficients of a Witt vector.
We will define operations on this type that are compatible with the (untruncated) Witt
vector operations.
`truncated_witt_vector p n R` takes a parameter `p : ℕ` that is not used in the definition.
In practice, this number `p` is assumed to be a prime number,
and under this assumption we construct a ring structure on `truncated_witt_vector p n R`.
(`truncated_witt_vector p₁ n R` and `truncated_witt_vector p₂ n R` are definitionally
equal as types but will have different ring operations.)
-/
@[nolint unused_arguments]
def truncated_witt_vector (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) := fin n → R
instance (p n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [inhabited R] : inhabited (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ _, default⟩
variables {n R}
namespace truncated_witt_vector
variables (p)
/-- Create a `truncated_witt_vector` from a vector `x`. -/
def mk (x : fin n → R) : truncated_witt_vector p n R := x
variables {p}
/-- `x.coeff i` is the `i`th entry of `x`. -/
def coeff (i : fin n) (x : truncated_witt_vector p n R) : R := x i
@[ext]
lemma ext {x y : truncated_witt_vector p n R} (h : ∀ i, x.coeff i = y.coeff i) : x = y :=
funext h
lemma ext_iff {x y : truncated_witt_vector p n R} : x = y ↔ ∀ i, x.coeff i = y.coeff i :=
⟨λ h i, by rw h, ext⟩
@[simp] lemma coeff_mk (x : fin n → R) (i : fin n) :
(mk p x).coeff i = x i := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_coeff (x : truncated_witt_vector p n R) :
mk p (λ i, x.coeff i) = x :=
by { ext i, rw [coeff_mk] }
variable [comm_ring R]
/--
We can turn a truncated Witt vector `x` into a Witt vector
by setting all coefficients after `x` to be 0.
-/
def out (x : truncated_witt_vector p n R) : 𝕎 R :=
witt_vector.mk p $ λ i, if h : i < n then x.coeff ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
@[simp]
lemma coeff_out (x : truncated_witt_vector p n R) (i : fin n) :
x.out.coeff i = x.coeff i :=
by rw [out, witt_vector.coeff_mk, dif_pos i.is_lt, fin.eta]
lemma out_injective : injective (@out p n R _) :=
begin
intros x y h,
ext i,
rw [witt_vector.ext_iff] at h,
simpa only [coeff_out] using h ↑i
end
end truncated_witt_vector
namespace witt_vector
variables {p} (n)
section
/-- `truncate_fun n x` uses the first `n` entries of `x` to construct a `truncated_witt_vector`,
which has the same base `p` as `x`.
This function is bundled into a ring homomorphism in `witt_vector.truncate` -/
def truncate_fun (x : 𝕎 R) : truncated_witt_vector p n R :=
truncated_witt_vector.mk p $ λ i, x.coeff i
end
variables {n}
@[simp] lemma coeff_truncate_fun (x : 𝕎 R) (i : fin n) :
(truncate_fun n x).coeff i = x.coeff i :=
by rw [truncate_fun, truncated_witt_vector.coeff_mk]
variable [comm_ring R]
@[simp] lemma out_truncate_fun (x : 𝕎 R) :
(truncate_fun n x).out = init n x :=
begin
ext i,
dsimp [truncated_witt_vector.out, init, select],
split_ifs with hi, swap, { refl },
rw [coeff_truncate_fun, fin.coe_mk],
end
end witt_vector
namespace truncated_witt_vector
variable [comm_ring R]
@[simp] lemma truncate_fun_out (x : truncated_witt_vector p n R) :
x.out.truncate_fun n = x :=
by simp only [witt_vector.truncate_fun, coeff_out, mk_coeff]
open witt_vector
variables (p n R)
include hp
instance : has_zero (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨truncate_fun n 0⟩
instance : has_one (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨truncate_fun n 1⟩
instance : has_nat_cast (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ i, truncate_fun n i⟩
instance : has_int_cast (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ i, truncate_fun n i⟩
instance : has_add (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ x y, truncate_fun n (x.out + y.out)⟩
instance : has_mul (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ x y, truncate_fun n (x.out * y.out)⟩
instance : has_neg (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ x, truncate_fun n (- x.out)⟩
instance : has_sub (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ x y, truncate_fun n (x.out - y.out)⟩
instance has_nat_scalar : has_smul ℕ (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ m x, truncate_fun n (m • x.out)⟩
instance has_int_scalar : has_smul ℤ (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
⟨λ m x, truncate_fun n (m • x.out)⟩
instance has_nat_pow : has_pow (truncated_witt_vector p n R) ℕ :=
⟨λ x m, truncate_fun n (x.out ^ m)⟩
@[simp] lemma coeff_zero (i : fin n) :
(0 : truncated_witt_vector p n R).coeff i = 0 :=
begin
show coeff i (truncate_fun _ 0 : truncated_witt_vector p n R) = 0,
rw [coeff_truncate_fun, witt_vector.zero_coeff],
end
end truncated_witt_vector
/-- A macro tactic used to prove that `truncate_fun` respects ring operations. -/
meta def tactic.interactive.witt_truncate_fun_tac : tactic unit :=
`[show _ = truncate_fun n _,
apply truncated_witt_vector.out_injective,
iterate { rw [out_truncate_fun] }]
namespace witt_vector
variables (p n R)
variable [comm_ring R]
lemma truncate_fun_surjective :
surjective (@truncate_fun p n R) :=
function.right_inverse.surjective truncated_witt_vector.truncate_fun_out
include hp
@[simp]
lemma truncate_fun_zero : truncate_fun n (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma truncate_fun_one : truncate_fun n (1 : 𝕎 R) = 1 := rfl
variables {p R}
@[simp]
lemma truncate_fun_add (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncate_fun n (x + y) = truncate_fun n x + truncate_fun n y :=
by { witt_truncate_fun_tac, rw init_add }
@[simp]
lemma truncate_fun_mul (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncate_fun n (x * y) = truncate_fun n x * truncate_fun n y :=
by { witt_truncate_fun_tac, rw init_mul }
lemma truncate_fun_neg (x : 𝕎 R) :
truncate_fun n (-x) = -truncate_fun n x :=
by { witt_truncate_fun_tac, rw init_neg }
lemma truncate_fun_sub (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncate_fun n (x - y) = truncate_fun n x - truncate_fun n y :=
by { witt_truncate_fun_tac, rw init_sub }
lemma truncate_fun_nsmul (x : 𝕎 R) (m : ℕ) :
truncate_fun n (m • x) = m • truncate_fun n x :=
by { witt_truncate_fun_tac, rw init_nsmul }
lemma truncate_fun_zsmul (x : 𝕎 R) (m : ℤ) :
truncate_fun n (m • x) = m • truncate_fun n x :=
by { witt_truncate_fun_tac, rw init_zsmul }
lemma truncate_fun_pow (x : 𝕎 R) (m : ℕ) :
truncate_fun n (x ^ m) = truncate_fun n x ^ m :=
by { witt_truncate_fun_tac, rw init_pow }
lemma truncate_fun_nat_cast (m : ℕ) : truncate_fun n (m : 𝕎 R) = m := rfl
lemma truncate_fun_int_cast (m : ℤ) : truncate_fun n (m : 𝕎 R) = m := rfl
end witt_vector
namespace truncated_witt_vector
open witt_vector
variables (p n R)
variable [comm_ring R]
include hp
instance : comm_ring (truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
(truncate_fun_surjective p n R).comm_ring _
(truncate_fun_zero p n R)
(truncate_fun_one p n R)
(truncate_fun_add n)
(truncate_fun_mul n)
(truncate_fun_neg n)
(truncate_fun_sub n)
(truncate_fun_nsmul n)
(truncate_fun_zsmul n)
(truncate_fun_pow n)
(truncate_fun_nat_cast n)
(truncate_fun_int_cast n)
end truncated_witt_vector
namespace witt_vector
open truncated_witt_vector
variables (n)
variable [comm_ring R]
include hp
/-- `truncate n` is a ring homomorphism that truncates `x` to its first `n` entries
to obtain a `truncated_witt_vector`, which has the same base `p` as `x`. -/
noncomputable! def truncate : 𝕎 R →+* truncated_witt_vector p n R :=
{ to_fun := truncate_fun n,
map_zero' := truncate_fun_zero p n R,
map_add' := truncate_fun_add n,
map_one' := truncate_fun_one p n R,
map_mul' := truncate_fun_mul n }
variables (p n R)
lemma truncate_surjective : surjective (truncate n : 𝕎 R → truncated_witt_vector p n R) :=
truncate_fun_surjective p n R
variables {p n R}
@[simp] lemma coeff_truncate (x : 𝕎 R) (i : fin n) :
(truncate n x).coeff i = x.coeff i :=
coeff_truncate_fun _ _
variables (n)
lemma mem_ker_truncate (x : 𝕎 R) :
x ∈ (@truncate p _ n R _).ker ↔ ∀ i < n, x.coeff i = 0 :=
begin
simp only [ring_hom.mem_ker, truncate, truncate_fun, ring_hom.coe_mk,
truncated_witt_vector.ext_iff, truncated_witt_vector.coeff_mk, coeff_zero],
exact fin.forall_iff
end
variables (p)
@[simp] lemma truncate_mk (f : ℕ → R) :
truncate n (mk p f) = truncated_witt_vector.mk _ (λ k, f k) :=
begin
ext i,
rw [coeff_truncate, coeff_mk, truncated_witt_vector.coeff_mk],
end
end witt_vector
namespace truncated_witt_vector
variable [comm_ring R]
include hp
/--
A ring homomorphism that truncates a truncated Witt vector of length `m` to
a truncated Witt vector of length `n`, for `n ≤ m`.
-/
def truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) : truncated_witt_vector p m R →+* truncated_witt_vector p n R :=
ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse (witt_vector.truncate m) out truncate_fun_out
⟨witt_vector.truncate n,
begin
intro x,
simp only [witt_vector.mem_ker_truncate],
intros h i hi,
exact h i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi hm)
end⟩
@[simp] lemma truncate_comp_witt_vector_truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) :
(@truncate p _ n R _ m hm).comp (witt_vector.truncate m) = witt_vector.truncate n :=
ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma truncate_witt_vector_truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) (x : 𝕎 R) :
truncate hm (witt_vector.truncate m x) = witt_vector.truncate n x :=
ring_hom.lift_of_right_inverse_comp_apply _ _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma truncate_truncate {n₁ n₂ n₃ : ℕ} (h1 : n₁ ≤ n₂) (h2 : n₂ ≤ n₃)
(x : truncated_witt_vector p n₃ R) :
(truncate h1) (truncate h2 x) = truncate (h1.trans h2) x :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := witt_vector.truncate_surjective p n₃ R x,
simp only [truncate_witt_vector_truncate],
end
@[simp] lemma truncate_comp {n₁ n₂ n₃ : ℕ} (h1 : n₁ ≤ n₂) (h2 : n₂ ≤ n₃) :
(@truncate p _ _ R _ _ h1).comp (truncate h2) = truncate (h1.trans h2) :=
begin
ext1 x, simp only [truncate_truncate, function.comp_app, ring_hom.coe_comp]
end
lemma truncate_surjective {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) : surjective (@truncate p _ _ R _ _ hm) :=
begin
intro x,
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := witt_vector.truncate_surjective p _ R x,
exact ⟨witt_vector.truncate _ x, truncate_witt_vector_truncate _ _⟩
end
@[simp] lemma coeff_truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) (i : fin n) (x : truncated_witt_vector p m R) :
(truncate hm x).coeff i = x.coeff (fin.cast_le hm i) :=
begin
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := witt_vector.truncate_surjective p _ _ x,
simp only [truncate_witt_vector_truncate, witt_vector.coeff_truncate, fin.coe_cast_le],
end
section fintype
omit hp
instance {R : Type*} [fintype R] : fintype (truncated_witt_vector p n R) := pi.fintype
variables (p n R)
lemma card {R : Type*} [fintype R] :
fintype.card (truncated_witt_vector p n R) = fintype.card R ^ n :=
by simp only [truncated_witt_vector, fintype.card_fin, fintype.card_fun]
end fintype
lemma infi_ker_truncate : (⨅ i : ℕ, (@witt_vector.truncate p _ i R _).ker) = ⊥ :=
begin
rw [submodule.eq_bot_iff],
intros x hx,
ext,
simp only [witt_vector.mem_ker_truncate, ideal.mem_infi, witt_vector.zero_coeff] at hx ⊢,
exact hx _ _ (nat.lt_succ_self _)
end
end truncated_witt_vector
namespace witt_vector
open truncated_witt_vector (hiding truncate coeff)
section lift
variable [comm_ring R]
variables {S : Type*} [semiring S]
variable (f : Π k : ℕ, S →+* truncated_witt_vector p k R)
variable f_compat : ∀ (k₁ k₂ : ℕ) (hk : k₁ ≤ k₂),
(truncated_witt_vector.truncate hk).comp (f k₂) = f k₁
variables {p R}
variable (n)
/--
Given a family `fₖ : S → truncated_witt_vector p k R` and `s : S`, we produce a Witt vector by
defining the `k`th entry to be the final entry of `fₖ s`.
-/
def lift_fun (s : S) : 𝕎 R :=
witt_vector.mk p $ λ k, truncated_witt_vector.coeff (fin.last k) (f (k+1) s)
variables {f}
include f_compat
@[simp] lemma truncate_lift_fun (s : S) :
witt_vector.truncate n (lift_fun f s) = f n s :=
begin
ext i,
simp only [lift_fun, truncated_witt_vector.coeff_mk, witt_vector.truncate_mk],
rw [← f_compat (i+1) n i.is_lt, ring_hom.comp_apply, truncated_witt_vector.coeff_truncate],
-- this is a bit unfortunate
congr' with _,
simp only [fin.coe_last, fin.coe_cast_le],
end
variable (f)
/--
Given compatible ring homs from `S` into `truncated_witt_vector n` for each `n`, we can lift these
to a ring hom `S → 𝕎 R`.
`lift` defines the universal property of `𝕎 R` as the inverse limit of `truncated_witt_vector n`.
-/
def lift : S →+* 𝕎 R :=
by refine_struct { to_fun := lift_fun f };
{ intros,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← ideal.mem_bot, ← infi_ker_truncate, ideal.mem_infi],
simp [ring_hom.mem_ker, f_compat] }
variable {f}
@[simp] lemma truncate_lift (s : S) :
witt_vector.truncate n (lift _ f_compat s) = f n s :=
truncate_lift_fun _ f_compat s
@[simp] lemma truncate_comp_lift :
(witt_vector.truncate n).comp (lift _ f_compat) = f n :=
by { ext1, rw [ring_hom.comp_apply, truncate_lift] }
/-- The uniqueness part of the universal property of `𝕎 R`. -/
lemma lift_unique (g : S →+* 𝕎 R) (g_compat : ∀ k, (witt_vector.truncate k).comp g = f k) :
lift _ f_compat = g :=
begin
ext1 x,
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← ideal.mem_bot, ← infi_ker_truncate, ideal.mem_infi],
intro i,
simp only [ring_hom.mem_ker, g_compat, ←ring_hom.comp_apply,
truncate_comp_lift, ring_hom.map_sub, sub_self],
end
omit f_compat
include hp
/-- The universal property of `𝕎 R` as projective limit of truncated Witt vector rings. -/
@[simps] def lift_equiv : {f : Π k, S →+* truncated_witt_vector p k R // ∀ k₁ k₂ (hk : k₁ ≤ k₂),
(truncated_witt_vector.truncate hk).comp (f k₂) = f k₁} ≃ (S →+* 𝕎 R) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, lift f.1 f.2,
inv_fun := λ g, ⟨λ k, (truncate k).comp g,
by { intros _ _ h, simp only [←ring_hom.comp_assoc, truncate_comp_witt_vector_truncate] }⟩,
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨f, hf⟩, simp only [truncate_comp_lift] },
right_inv := λ g, lift_unique _ _ $ λ _, rfl }
lemma hom_ext (g₁ g₂ : S →+* 𝕎 R) (h : ∀ k, (truncate k).comp g₁ = (truncate k).comp g₂) :
g₁ = g₂ :=
lift_equiv.symm.injective $ subtype.ext $ funext h
end lift
end witt_vector
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.